The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1994-11-09 \ xpH,T4iIp4, ~"° °'• COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ,1 �+xpE rpp (714)962-2411 II I} November 3, 1994 NOTICE OF MEETING JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA WEDNESDAY. NOVEMBER 9° 1994 - 7B0 P.M. DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Califomia 92708 The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at i� the above location, time and date. �� Assistant Bo& S tart' Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: FINANCE & PERSONNEL COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 16th, at 5:30 p.m. STEERING COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 30th, at 4:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 30th, at 5:30 p.m. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 9E ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1pW ELLISAVENUE 20.Box a121 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CAUFOMA 92M "1.19824a11 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings November Nov 09, 1994 Nov 30, 1994 December Dec 14, 1994 None Scheduled January Jan 11, 1995 Jan 25, 1995 February Feb 08, 1995 Feb 22, 1995 March Mar 08, 1995 Mar 22, 1995 April Apr 12, 1995 Apr 26, 1995 May May 10, 1995 May 24, 1995 June Jun 14, 1995 Jun 28, 1995 July Jul 12, 1995 Jul 26, 1995 August Aug 09, 1995 None Scheduled September Sep 13, 1995 Sep 27, 1995 October Oct 11, 1995 Oct 25, 1995 November Nov 08, 1995 None Scheduled 'A AGENDA JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 9, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. j In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section.54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date andtime above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the Board.Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to.the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section /^ 54954.2(b)as an emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action I which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. -_ (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chair pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chair, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. �\ Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 11/09/94 (6) The Joint Chair, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chair; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chair: District 1 - October 12, 1994 regular District 2 - October 12, 1994 regular District 3 - October 12, 1994 regular District 5 - October 12, 1994 regular District 6 - October 12, 1994 regular District 7 - October 12, 1994 regular District 11 - October 12, 1994 regular District 13 - October 12, 1994 regular District 14 - October 12, 1994 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) 10/05/94 10/19/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $637,371.26 $737,548.19 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,670,621.89 157,598.43 Joint Working Capital Fund - 162,603.04 147,479.26 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 53,693.92 60,649.18 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 0.00 7,121.93 DISTRICT N0. 2 - 572,169.86 40,084.94 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 75,646.96 75,522.64 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 8,332.15 12,653.31 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 24,859.82 DISTRICT NO, 7 - 5,174.66 14,655.12 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 16,207.81 172,888.86 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 101 .63 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 24,888.79 1,059,665.09 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 7,410.94 1,958.30 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,838.39 0.00 n DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 4,861.93 691.17 $3,241 ,821.60 52.513.477.87 -2- J 11/09/94 (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(e) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar byaDirector, staff member or member - of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these `. items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action l approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included '.-on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall''. be considered in the regular order of business. . Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item tobe removed from the consent calendar. The Chair will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent ' ( calendar. -------------------------- Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file staff report dated November 2, 1994, and approving extension of completion date for the Collaborative National Study Using Molecular Techniques to Detect Hepatitis A Virus and Virulence Factor Genes in E. Coll (Project No. HR-92-06)with National Water Research Institute (NWRI), University of North Carolina (UNC) and Hawaii Water Resources Research Center (HWRRC), from June 30, 1994 to February 28, 1995, with no change in the grant funding amount of $888,1 1 1.00. (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the settlement of Workers' Compensation claim for former employee, Peggy Rupp, in the amount of $22,000.00. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the settlement of Workers' Compensation claim for employee John Soto in the amount of $20,000.00. /�\ -3- T Y 11/09/94 (9) DISTRICT 5 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Cross-Complaint entitled 21 at Century Casualty Company vs. State of California, State of California vs. County Sanitation District No. 5 and Anaheim Sewer Construction, Orange County Municipal Court Case No. 94-C-2083,seeking recovery for alleged property damage, and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts and to seek recovery of its costs and fees related thereto. DISTRICT 7 (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-133-7,ordering annexation of 1.599 acres of territory to the District, in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of Ranchwood Trail and Amapola Avenue in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 139 - Garr Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -4- 11/09/94 '1 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (al Minutes of the Executive Committee (copies enclosed with Directors' Executive Committee agenda material). (1) Receive and file draft Operations Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 5, 1994 (2) Receive and file draft Engineering and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 6, 1994 (3) Receive and file draft Executive Subcommittee Minutes for the meeting held on October 14, 1994 (41 Receive and file draft Finance and Personnel Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 19, 1994 (5) Receive and file draft minutes of the Special Executive Search Committee meeting held on October 26, 1994 (6 ) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 26, 1994 (b) Consideration of the following actions recommended by said committees: (1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver, Inc. for design and construction services required for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1.44, and Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53, providing for additional design and construction support services, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. (2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design, construction support services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional construction support services, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. -5- [ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 61 e 11/09/94 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 5) (b) (3) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for additional studies, preparation of plans and specifications and construction support services for Rehabilitation of Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41, and Rehabilitation of Clarifiers D through 0 at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48, providing for additional design and software programming services: (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Engineering and Construction Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said services. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-131 , approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said additional services, on an hourly rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit for an additional amount not to exceed $67,198.00,increasing the total authorized compensation from 8482,210.00to an amount not to exceed $549,408.00. (4) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-1,Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-1, Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38.4,and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-3,authorizing an addition of $26,350.00to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc., Division of turn Constructors, Inc., for four items of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $6,049,864.00to an amount not to exceed $6,076,214.00. (5) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, authorizing an addition of $25,000.00to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for one item of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $3,303,553.00to an amount not to exceed $3,328,553.00. -6- [ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 71 lam',\ e 11/09/94 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (b) (6) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2,authorizing an addition of $22,039.00to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for three items of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $14,319,852.00to an amount not to exceed $14,341,891.00. (7) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23.5.1 (Rebid No. 2). authorizing a net addition of $38,854.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. for three items of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $2,321,798.00to an amount not to exceed $2,360,652.00,and granting a time extension of 19 calendar days for completion of said additional work. (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report prepared by staff and KPMG Peat Marwick, Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1994(copy enclosed with Directors' �\ agenda materiall. (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, re Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1: (a) Verbal report of Director of Engineering (bl Consideration of motion to receive and file comments received on the Notice of Preparation of Supplement No. 3 to said Program Environmental Impact Report. (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated October 13, 1994 and Draft Supplement No. 3 to said Program Environmental Impact Report. (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to file a Notice of Completion of Draft Supplement No. 3 to said Program Environmental Impact Report. (a) Consideration of motion fixing December 14, 1994,at 7:30 p.m., at the Districts' administrative office, as the date, time and place for public hearing on Draft Supplement No. 3 to said Program Environmental Impact Report. (f) Consideration of motion establishing December 31, 1994,as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft Supplement No. 3 to said Program Environmental Impact Report -7- t 11/09/94 (14) ALL DISTRICTS _____.__._—_.._____.____.______._______._.....___......______.__.__.__.__.__._..._..._...__.__._.................. i .CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chair may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections ! 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of I pending or potential litigation; Icl employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required I disclosures of information. i (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) (1) Confer with Districts' representatives concerning status of negotiations with employee group representatives on salaries, benefits and terms of employment. (a) Districts' Representatives: General Manager, General Counsel, Director of Personnel and Director of Finance (b) Confidential Employees (2) Confer with General Manager re status of proceedings for the termination of Districts' Laboratory Manager (Government Code Section 54957). (3) Meet to consider the appointment for the position of Board Secretary (Government Code Section 54957). (c) Reconvene in regular session (d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session (15) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (16) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director would like staff to report on at a subsequent meeting (17) ALL DISTRICTS Matters which a Director may wish to place on a future agenda for action and staff report -8- 11/09/94 08) DISTRICT2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 09) DISTRICT Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (251 DISTRICT 13 �\ Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn (281 DISTRICT 1 Consideration of the following actions pertaining to request of the City of Santa Ana for waiver of $245,913.40capital facilities connection charges for Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Santa Ana, between West Fourth and Fifth Streets and Broadway and Ross Avenues: Is) Verbal report of Director of Engineering and General Counsel (b) Discussion (c) (1) Consideration of motion to deny request -or- (2) Consideration of motion fixing December 14, 1994,at 7:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office, as the date, time and place for public hearing to amend Ordinance No. 119 -9- 11/09/94 (29) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of a project report, design and construction support services required for Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Contract No. 3-38: (a) Verbal report of Director of Engineering (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file Project Report prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation. (c) Consideration of motion directing staff and Boyle Engineering Corporation to proceed with preparation of the plans and specifications for Alternative No. 1, dividing Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Contract No. 3-38, into three separate projects, Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 1 (Rostrata Avenue to 5,800 feet North of Rosecrans Avenue), Contract No. 3-38-1; Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, �\ Reach 2 (5,800 feet North of Rosecrans Avenue to Imperial Highway), Contract No. 3-38-2; and Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 3 (Beach Boulevard to Harbor Boulevard), Contract No. 3-38-3. (32) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (34) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Consideration of the following actions relative to Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3: (a) Verbal report of Director of Engineering (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, changing the date for receipt of bids from October 11, 1994 to October 13, 1994, and making miscellaneous technical clarifications. W Consideration of Resolution No. 94-132,receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3,to Wal-Con Construction Company in the total amount of $1,985,000.00. -10- 11/09/94 (35) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (36) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (37) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (38) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn NOTICE TO DIRECTORS: To place items on the agenda for the Regular Meeting of the j Joint Boards, Directors shall submit items to the Board Secretary not later than the close ? of business 14 days preceding the Joint Board meeting. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and 1 General Counsel and all formal communications. 1 Assistant Board Secretary: Penny Kyle (714) 962-2411,ext. 2026 � i Secretary: Petra Tyndall (714) 962-2411,ext. 2029 i r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 13, 2, 33, 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MMJTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON OCTOBER 12, 1994 i ISATlp $ ^,G GEC ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES a 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos, 1, 2,3, S. B, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California.was held on October 12, 1994, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocnion the roll wee called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2,3, S,B,7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTWE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Fred Banera.Chair Gene Beyer James M.Ferrymen,Clair We tee �_ James A.Wahmr t Pot McGuigan Thomas E.Llrh e L Rotor Stamen Wlliee G. Stelmr �^ Tracy A.Wotley Thomas R. Saltarelli DISTRICT NO.2: _� John Collins. Chair Games Scott L In,Fickler,Chair Wo tee Tom Deh Fred Banes Gene Beyer x Buck Catlin Chris Never, L Barry Dems Bob Bell y_ Norman Z.Eckvra de _ Michael MaerRweger L William D.Mahoney James H.Flare 3_ Caney J.Nelson Glenn Porker y Miguel Pulido Thomas E.Lutr Roger Stamen William G.Steiner Daniel T.Welch John M.Guinean Geoec L.Zleket 6haldon Singer DISTRICT NO.3: x Sal A.Sapien,Chair W Iliac C.Estrada Bumie Dunlap. Chair pro ter Garrey J.Nelson L George Brown _ Frank Laezlo Buck Catlin _ Chris Wool, Jahn Collins George Scott g_ James H.Flare William D.Mahoney Z Don R.Griffin Donald Bane i Wally Lbm Eve G.Miner l_ Thomas E. Luer Pat McGuigan LkMa Moultao Pombrson Earle Robitaille x Richard Partin Joyce C. Nicholson 1 Iry Rckler Tom Daly • Margie L.Rice James V. Evans • Sheldon Singer George L.Maker Roger Stamen William G.Steiner i Charles Sylvia Anchor, Selvagip DISTRICT NO.S: �, Phil Su mom, Chair Jan Delay Wlkam G.Stainer,Chair pro tam _ Roger Stevan John C.Cox,Jr. _ Jan Delay DISTRICT NO. 6: James A.Waiver,Chair Arthur Perry Z Evelyn Han,Chair pro cove John C.Coo.Jr. W eiem G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: Sorry Hammond,Chair Mike Ward • Thomas R.Saltarelh.Chair pro cam Jim Pons _JC_ Fred Banera Gene Beyer Jan Delay Phil Samone Ted Mariam Miguel Pulim a_ Wlllium G.Steiner Roper Stamen James A.Wahmr Mike Schaefer DISTRICT NO. 11: y_ Grace Wnchell, Chair Eade Rabaul Victor Leipzig.Coal,pro tam Linda MoultoePonerson Roper Stanton William G.Stainer n DISTRICT NO.13: John M.ricer,Chair Chair Daniel T.nlap L Glenn Porker,Chair pro tam Burnie Dunlap Fred Banera Gene Beyer Iry 1pen G To. taly William G.Steiner _ Rogerr St St anen r \ DISTRICT NO.14: g Peer A.Swan,Chair Darryl Miller Berry Hammond, Chair pro tam _ Mike Ward Fred Rams _ Gem Beyer Jim Pons _ Tracy A.Watley William G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton -2- 10/12/94 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Penny i"`� Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Margie Nellor, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Berenson, Judy Bucher, John Finias, C Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Dale Sparks, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Bill Knopf, Kris Lindstrom DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file written communication from Costa Mesa Sanitary District That the written communication from the Costa Mesa Sanitary District re appointment of James A. Wahner as alternate Director for James Ferryman for the meeting of October 12, 1994, only, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 5 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt from the City of Newport Beach That the minute excerpt from the City of Newport Beach re appointment of alternate Directors to the Mayor and seating new members of the Boards, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: Dis ri t Active Director Alternate Director 5 Jan Debay Phil Sansone 7 Phil Sansone Jan Debay DISTRICT 5 The Joint Chair announced that the Chair of Election of Chairman District No. 5 had been vacated by a change in Board representation and that election of a new Chair would, therefore, be in order. Director Jan Debay was then duly nominated and elected Chair of District No. 5. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair recognized employee Dale Recoanition of persons who wish to be Sparks, who wished to comment to the Boards heard on matters of general interest of Directors regarding retiring General Manager, Wayne Sylvester. Mr. Sparks, an employee for 25 years, acknowledged the dedication and skilled leadership and management of Mr. Sylvester, as well as the numerous awards won during Mr. Sylvester's tenure as General Manager. 0 -3- 10/12/94 ��ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair announced the tentatively �eoort of the Joint Chair scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: n Executive Subcommittee- Friday, October 14th, at 3:00 p.m. Finance and Personnel Committee- Wednesday, October 19th, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee- Wednesday, October 26th, at 5:30 p.m. Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee- Wednesday, November 2nd, at 5:30 p.m. Planning, Design and Construction Committee- Thursday, November 3rd, at 5:30 p.m. Joint Chair Cox then commented on retiring Director Buck Catlin and commended Mr. Catlin for his many years of service to the Sanitation Districts. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel referred Directors to four Report of the General Counsel memoranda that were included in the Directors' meeting folders for information only. The first memorandum, relative to appeal of Cal-OSHA citations, briefly summarized the status of the Districts' appeal. The second memorandum was a status report regarding Grewal v. County Sanitation District No. 2, a case involving the Anaheim Hills landslide damage. Mr. Woodruff reported that the counsel for the defense has dismissed the District from this case. The third memorandum, a litigation status report regarding Home Insurance Company v. Brinderson Corporation, reported that of the $3,586,689.00 awarded to the Districts in binding arbitration, to date the Districts had received partial satisfaction of that judgment of $2,946,726.48. Mr. Woodruff then discussed the fourth memorandum regarding litigation on payment of sales tax to Cooper Industries. He referenced a recent newspaper article which omitted some material facts to the case, and referred the Directors to excerpted portions contained in the court's written decision. It was reiterated that the Directors had been thorougly briefed prior to their authorization of seeking recovery of the sales tax. General Counsel then reported that approximately one year ago the State Board of Equalization imposed a fee requirement upon the Districts of $460,500.00for cleanups of hazardous waste releases caused by other persons. The fee was paid under protest while ' seeking to recover the fees. He stated that the State Board of Equalization has now agreed to refund the entire amount. The Directors were then advised that the District Attorney's office had recently contacted Mr. Woodruff's office requesting a meeting with the General Manager and himself. /'O�\ Although the nature of the meeting was not specified, it was thought to be in connection -4- 10/12/94 with the Districts' participation, along with other agencies, in the regulation of hazardous waste and toxic materials and the District Attorney's obligation to prosecute certain violations of these regulations. Mr. Woodruff stated that he would apprise the Directors following the meeting. a DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994,the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to Aooroval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meetings held October 12, 1994,the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held October 12 1994,the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994,the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994,the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -5- 10/12/94 ,,--ALLD15THICT5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: atification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 7 9 09/21/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 835,818.47 S 1,256,439.69 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 961,002.24 820,379.07 Joint Working Capital Fund - 189,669.10 110,187.43 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 46,067.61 21,891.87 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 11,077.77 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 235,836.71 108.65 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 159,483.83 29,574.64 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 20,030.41 12,994.69 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 4,349.18 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 132,586.00 52,479.00 DISTRICT NO 11 - 32,693.18 1,848.34 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 1,358.14 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 23,808.45 1,678,319.89 /°"DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 182,415.86 922.32 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,649.90 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS, 7 & 14 JOINT 4,164.84 260.97 52.643.011.69 S3.985.406.56 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Microcomputer Hardware. Software and Associated Peripherals. That the bid tabulation and recommendation for Specification No. E-248, to GET. Inc. award of purchase order contract for Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, Specification No. E-248, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the bid of JIT Computer Source, Inc., be, and is hereby, rejected for failure to meet the specifications; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to GST, Inc. for 22 systems and 36 upgrades, for a total amount not to exceed $101,442.00 plus sales tax. �1 -6- 10/1 2/94 ALL DISTRICTS Actions pertainino to replacement of Plant No 1 secondary aeration basin air diffusers t Authorizing staff to issue a Moved, seconded and duly carried: purchase order to Coombs-Hopkins r Company for Purchase of Wyss That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Replacement Diffuser Sheaths a purchase order to Coombs-Hopkins Company (Specification No. E-249) in the amount of $42,000.00 plus sales tax and freight, for Purchase of Wyss Replacement Diffuser Sheaths (Specification No. E-2491. Authorizing the General Manager Moved, seconded and duly carried: to award a contract for Replacement of Diffusers in Plant That the General Manager be, and is hereby, No. 1 Aeration Basins. authorized to solicit bids and award a contract to Specification No. M-050 the low bidder for Replacement of Diffusers in Plant No. 1 Aeration Basins, Specification No. M-050, in an amount not to exceed $60,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Nuttall Gear Corporation for That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Purchase of One Gear Box for Sunflower a purchase order to Nuttall Gear Corporation, for !� Pump Station (Specification No E-250) a total amount not to exceed $28,605.00 plus sales tax, for Purchase of One Gear Box for Sunflower Pump Station (Specification No. E-250). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the draft minutes of the Fiscal Policy Committee meeting held on September 21, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Subcommittee That the draft minutes of the Executive Subcommittee meeting held on September 28, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on September 28, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -7- 10/12/94 �QLL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: receive. file and approve KPMG Peat Marwick Internal Control Report and Staff That the KPMG Peat Marwick Internal Control Report Re Response to KPMG's Internal Report dated June 10, 1994 and Staff Report Re Control Review Report Response to KPMG's Internal Control Review Report dated September 21, 1994, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to analyze those recommendations requiring additional resources for future review by the new Finance and Personnel Committee. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue Chance Order No. 3 to Purchase Order No. 65384 That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue issued to Public Financial Management Change Order No. 3 to Purchase Order No. 65384 issued to Public Financial Management, extending services through October 31, 1994,at no increase in the maximum authorized compensation of $50,000.00. DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 6. 7 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying the Adjustment of Shares of Various Districts of the Cost of Certain That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the Improvements to Joint Facilities. following resolutions, Ratifying the Adjustment 140*,�,990-92 Series "C" Certificates of of Shares of Various Districts of the Cost of .'articipation Certain Improvements to Joint Facilities, 1990-92 Series "C" Certificates of Participation: DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 1 94-120-1 2 94-121-2 3 94-122-3 6 94-123-6 7 94-124-7 11 94-125-11 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amendino Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20. as That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt amended. re Laboratory Division Resolution No. 94-126,amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20,as amended, adding one Scientist Ib4080- $5775)and one Senior Lab Analyst ($3125- $3891)1 to the Laboratory Division. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -B- 10/12f94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Classification and _ Compensation Resolution No. 79-20.as That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt amended re Safety & Health Office Resolution No. 94-127,amending Classification r and Operations & Maintenance and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20,as Department amended, relative to the Safety & Health Office and the Operations & Maintenance Department, as follows: ADD MONTHLY <DELETE> POSRION SALARY RANGE SAFETY &HEALTH OFFICE N/A Safety & Emergency Response $4,960- $7,015 Manager (Title Change Only) 1 Safety & Emergency Response $3,880- $5,490 Specialist <1> Hazardous Materials Specialist $2,755- $3,910 1 Intern $16.00/hr.MAX OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT <1> Emergency Preparedness Coordinator $4,455- $6,360 <1> Intern $16.00/hr.MAX Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Steering Committee That the draft minutes of the Steering Committee meeting held on September 29, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chair Cox reported that the Special Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Search Committee met with three Special Executive Search Committee firms to evaluate their capabilities in assisting the Boards in the search for a new General Manager, and selected David M. Griffith and Associates. The Joint Chair then briefly reviewed the process the consultant and the committee will undertake to narrow the selection for a new general manager to three to four candidates. The Committee will then bring their recommendation to the Joint Boards for approval. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Special Executive Search Committee meeting held on October 5, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. �..� -9- 10/12/94 ,....ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors the neneral Counsel's Comments Prior to need for a closed session as authorized by Closed Session Government Code Section 54956.9, 54957 and 54957.6 to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Item 16(b)(1)(b), (c), (d) and (a) on the published Agenda. General Counsel also indicated a need to add one item needing immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda. He reported that additional items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)upon a two-thirds vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Add Items to the Closed Session Agenda That Item 16(b)(2) re appointment and employment of an individual member of staff be added to the Agenda to consider appointment of Acting General Manager. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9. The Boards convened in closed session at 54957 and 54957.6 8:04 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9,54957 and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California government Code Section 54957.2 and are r0�\ maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. No actions were taken re Agenda Item (16)(b)(1)(e). ALL DISTRICTS At 8:21 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approval of Memorandum of Understanding with Professional That the Memorandum of Understanding with Employees Unit the Districts' Professional Employee Unit, represented by the Federation of Public Sector Workers, for the period February 1, 1994through January 31, 1997, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager and Personnel Director, be, and are hereby, authorized to execute said Memorandum of Understanding. r�1 -10- 1 on 2/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approval of Memorandum of Understanding with Supervisory That the Memorandum of Understanding with Employees Unit the Districts' Supervisory Employee Unit, represented by the Federation of Public Sector Workers, for the period February 1, 1994 through January 31, 1997, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager and Personnel Director, be, and are hereby, authorized to execute said Memorandum of Understanding. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving establishment of MPRP Salary Merit Pool funds and other That the establishment of MPRP Salary Merit revisions to terms and conditions of Pool funds and other revisions in the terms employment for Executive Management and conditions of employment as set forth in Employee Classifications the Memoranda of Understanding with the Professional and Supervisory bargaining groups, for the period February 1, 1994through January 31, 1997, be, and are hereby, approved for Executive Management Employee Classifications; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager and Personnel Director, be, and are hereby, authorized to implement said revisions. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aporovino salary adjustments and other revisions to terms and conditions That the salary adjustments and other of employment for Part-time. Hourly revisions in the terms and conditions of and Unrepresented Employees employment as set forth in the Memoranda of Classifications Understanding with the Districts' Administrative and Clerical, Engineering, Technical Services, and Operations and Maintenance Employees bargaining units, for the period November 26, 1993 through November 21, 1996, be, and are hereby, approved for employees in Part-time, Hourly and Unrepresented Classifications, as appropriate; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager and Personnel Director be, and are hereby, authorized to implement said revisions. -1 1- 10/12/94 .^,ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: A000intina Blake P. Anderson as Acting General Manager and That the Boards of Directors hereby appoint au_thorizino him to execute any and all Blake P. Anderson to serve as Acting General Districts' documents authorized to be Manager, and authorizing him to execute any executed by the General Manager and all Districts' documents authorized to be pursuant to Resolution No. 84-137, executed by the General Manager pursuant to effective October 14, 1994 Resolution No. 84-137,effective October 14, 1994; and, FURTHER MOVED: That a 5.5% increase in salary be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with the provisions of the Districts' compensation resolution. DISTRICT 1 Continuing consideration of request of the City of Santa Ana for waiver of capital facilities connection charges for Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Santa Ana to the November 9. 1994 meeting Receive and file letter from City Moved, seconded and duly carried: of Santa Ana reguestino waiver of capital facilities connection That the letter dated September 23, 1994, /0'\ charges from the City of Santa Ana requesting a waiver of $231,475.00 capital facilities connection charges for the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Santa Ana, between West Fourth and Fifth Streets and Broadway and Ross Avenues, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Consideration of action relative Blake Anderson, Director of Engineering, to request of City of Santa Ana summarized the request of the City of Santa for waiver of capital facilities Ana for waiver of $231,475.00 capital connection fees facilities connection charges for the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Santa Ana. Following a brief discussion, it was moved and seconded that the request be respectfully denied. It was then noted that no Directors from the City of Santa Ana were present. A substitute motion was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the request of the City of Santa Ana for waiver of $231,475.00 capital facilities connection charges for Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Santa Ana, between West Fourth and Fifth Streets and Broadway and Ross Avenues, be, and is hereby, continued to the November 9, 1994 meeting. -12- 10/12/94 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizino the General Manager to execute a Supplemental Agreement That the Board of Directors hereby adopts with Atchison. Topeka and Santa Fe Resolution No. 94-128-2,authorizing the Railway Company (AT&SF) re Contract General Manager to execute a Supplemental Nos. 2-14-5 and 2-36 Agreement with Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (AT&SF) for construction of additional encasement to the Santa Ana River Interceptor Sewer, Reaches 6, 7 and 8, Contract No. 2-14-5, at the Green River Golf Course within AT&SF's right-of- way, said work to be performed under Sewer Modifications for AT&SF Commuter Rail, Contract No. 2-36. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A journment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. -13- 10/12/94 �DISTRI TS 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: uthorizino the Selection Committee to neaotiate Addendum No 1 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is Professional Services Agreement with hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum Boyle Engineerino corporation for No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement design and construction services re with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design Contract Nos. 7-7-1 and 7-14 and construction services re Improvements to Main Street Pump Station, Contract No. 7-7-1, and Abandonment of Nine District No. 7 Pump Stations, Contract No. 7-14, providing for additional design services. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Orderina Annexation No. 145 - RTC Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-129-7,ordering annexation of 0.942 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity northwest of the intersection of Overhill Drive and Deer Haven Drive in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 145 - RTC Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 148 - Crawford Hills Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-130-7,ordering annexation P"`� of 128.734 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity northeast of the intersection of Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road in the City of Orange (Annexation No. 148 - Crawford Hills Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Actions pertaining to appeal of capital facilities connection charges for self- storage oroiect in Irvine (Betty Jo Humiston, dba Irvine Self Storagel Receive and file letter from Moved, seconded and duly carried: Jordan-Valli Architects. Inc. appealing capital facilities That the letter from Jordan-Valli Architects, connection charges Inc. dated July 25, 1994, appealing capital facilities connection charges for self-storage project in Irvine, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. r^� -14- 10/1 2/94 Consideration of action relative The Director of Engineering, Blake Anderson, to appeal of Betty Jo Humiston, briefly reviewed the appeal request and dba Irvine Self Storage described the project, referring to the similarities of the same type of appeal and building usage in Newport Beach that came before the Directors in July and was approved. Mr. Anderson stated that the project was a 103,000 square foot storage building and would require approximately $48,000.00 in connection ' charges. The 1,500 square foot living quarters and 340 square foot business office would be separated by a fire wall. The appeal requests connection charges to only be levied on the living quarters and business office portions of the project totalling a connection fee of $4,700.00. It was then moved and seconded: To approve the appeal of Betty Jo Humiston, dba Irvine Self Storage re: Connection charges to be paid for the project and find and determine that the project consists of two separate buildings; that connection charges as prescribed by the District ordinance are due and owing for that portion of the project shown as the office manager quarters and business office totalling $4,700.00;and that no connection charges are due and owing for the other building consisting of the individual storage units as they have no water or sewer facilities or connections; and that a request for Notice of Change in Ownership or Financial Interest be recorded in the official records of Orange County; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said waiver of fees is only for the current use of self-storage for the buildings. If the building usage is converted in the future for any other usage, the connection fees in effect at that time would then be due and payable. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. -15- 10/12/94 TRI 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: diournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:21 p.m. Assistant Secret 1 of h oards of Directors of County Sanit i Dis s Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 4 -16- FUN. J 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE B/3IM PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09AI7AM POSTING DATE 09M7194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139059 AG TECH COMPANY f55,297.08 RESIDUALS REMOVALMO.10.9-91 139860 ASR ANALYSIS f956.00 VIBRATION TESTING 139861 ATM AA,INC. $1.760.00 LAB SERVICES M.O.1148-92 139862 AT&T $971.46 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 139863 ACCELERATED POWER TECH. $1.357.57 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139864 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $268,760.80 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-1 139865 ALLIED SERVICES f94.64 PIPING 13986E AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $555.08 GREASE 139867 AMER.SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY $447.95 LAB SUPPLIES 139860 AMERICAN TESTING LAB $162.50 LAB SERVICES 139869 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $11,345,07 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS 139870 BLAKE P.ANDERSON f530.40 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE(5 MONTHS) 139871 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $20.50 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 139872 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $175.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139873 ABC LABORATORIES $1,395.00 LAB SERVICES 139874 AQUATIC CENTER $20.00 AIR BOTTLES 139875 ARK TECHNOLOGIES $21.600.00 USER FEE PROGRAMMING 139876 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. f35.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL r*I 139877 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $174.56 BUILDING MATERIALS x 139878 AA&CIACORDIA f120.74 HEALTH INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION .�. 139879 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE f321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT W 139860 AVNETCOMPUTER $416.68 COMPUTER EOUIPMENT -1 139881 AZIMUTH TECHNOLOGIES,INC. f6.970.08 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 139BB2 BKK LANDFILL $2,976.66 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.OAO.9-91 n 139083 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,269.32 BATTERIES 139884 OUTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. 310A10.11 LAB SUPPLIES 139886 BELL SECURITY VI $4.425$3.644.00 SERVICE AGREESERVICMENT 139887 BID TECHNET.IINC. C. f3,554.22 COMPUEAGREEMENT 139868 BID TECH NET,INC. 447.31 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 139889 BISHOP COMPANY $197.01 TOOLS 139890 BISHOPS SANITARY MAIM.SUPP. $153.10 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139891 BORNEMAES f798.45 TRUCK PARTS 139892 BOYLEENGNPUMPS,INC. 30.925A5 PUMP PARTS 139893 BUD ET JANITORIAL CORP. f$5.221.00 ENGINEERING RVICESSERVICES 7-17 139894 BUDGET JANITORIAL 15.250.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 139895 BUS"&ASSOCIATES.INC. fl$913.18 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O 8-B-94 139896 CENTBUY-CHEM ORPORTRIBUTORS $402.65 LAB SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 139897 CEM CORPORATION ,153.72 PLUMBING 139898 CS COMPANY f$290,93 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139899 CALIF OL.IAA $130.46 HARDWARE 139900 CALIFORNIA SUPOMATICPRESSION GATENSY $518.00 SERVICE INSTRUMENT EEMENT PARTS 139901 CALIFORNIA SUPPRESSION SYSTEM f200.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139901 CARLET NCE ENVIRONMENTAL LABS $6,400.00 LAB SERVICES 139903 CARLETON ENGINEERS 56.811.28 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-34 QUALITY 139903 JOHN CENTREOINT ENGINEERS f58,512.04 ENGINOFFICE FUNITURVICES J-34 g9904 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. fS?2.01 OFFICE FURNITURE FUNDING 9199 - H GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE B/3I/94 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/07/94 POSTING DATE 09/0794 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 139905 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. S270.00 AIR COMPRESSOR PARTS 139M COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $944.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139907 COASTAL VIDEO COMMUNICATION $117.68 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 13990E COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $1,290,08 LAB SUPPLIES 1399U9 COUCH AND SONS $188.673,75 CONSTRUCTION 2-9 RI 139910 COUCH B SONS $179.993,71 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-4 139911 COMPOST SCIENCE B UTILIZATION $125.00 SUBSCRIPTION 1399t2 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $26.435.39 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 139913 COMPUSA,INC. 8307.7E COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1399t4 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $2.82 TRUCK PARTS 139915 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 946E.I5 ELECTRIC PARTS 139916 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. SIA96.73 HARDWARE 139917 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. S2,23043 CHLORINE M 0.1&11-93 139910 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS $1.835,49 LAB SUPPLIES 139919 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $9.256.97 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.&11-93 139920 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $13.082.53 ENGINE PARTS 139921 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $103,18 ELECTRIC PARTS 71 139922 CHARLES P.CROWLEY CO. 8109A8 INSTRUMENT PARTS X 139923 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $350.05 COOPERATIVE PURCHASE FEES = 139924 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $9,627.00 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT TAXES 139925 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 5600.00 ANNEXATION FEES PASS THROUGH 139928 DAPPER TIRE $33.92 TRUCK TIRES 139927 PETER C.DAVID CO. 896,255.31 CONSTRUCTION 7.20 D 13992E DOUGLAS A DAVIS E ASSOC.INC. $5,115,03 SAFETY CONSULTANT I 139929 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $36,02943 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN N 139930 DIAMOND LINERS.INC. $788.88 TRUCK PARTS 139931 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $9,259.95 ANIONIC POLYMER M.08-11-93 139932 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP, $3,142.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139933 IWC ENVIRONMENTAL $3,84628 MACHINE REPAIRS 139934 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $820.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 139935 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $702.85 PAINT SUPPLIES 139936 DURKEE TESTING 1170.00 LAB SERVICES 139937 ESP NORTH $421.01 TOOLS 139930 EBB $162,14 LAB SUPPLIES 139939 EASTMAN.INC. $3.410,78 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1399/D ECOANALYSIS,INC. $2.248.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 139941 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $412.29 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139942 ENCHANTER,INC. $5,04000 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 138943 EXIDE ELECTRONICS S4,898.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT t39944 FLUID TECH,SALES S132.54 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 139945 MARSHALL FAIRRES $7808 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 139946 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5.72000 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.B.ID 9-91 139947 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $293.50 AIR FREIGHT 139MB FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $846.20 LAB SUPPLIES 139949 FLAT E VERTICAL,INC. $1,126.00 CONCRETE CUTTING 139950 FLO-SYSTEMS S2,518.31 PUMP PARTS FUNL )9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8l3IM PAGE 03 REPORTNUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09MT/94 POSTING DATE 09/07/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 139951 FLORIDA DRIVES 8 GEAR MOTORS 31,036.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 139952 CLIFFORD A.FORKERT 32,218A5 SURVEYING SERVICESMO.".94 139953 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $269.87 PHOTO SUPPLIES 139954 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $59.31 PAINTSUPPLIES 139955 THE FOXBORO CO. 31,608.52 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139956 FREEDOM IMAGING 316847 LAB SUPPLIES 139957 FREEWAY TRUCK PARTS $634,22 TRUCK PARTS 139958 FULLER FORD 344.085A4 TRUCKS M.O.4-13.94 139959 FUSION DEKORON $31XL55 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 139%0 GST,INC. $204.86 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139%1 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,79046 TELEPHONE SERVICES 139962 GENICOM CORPORATION $839.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139N3 GIERLICHWITCHELL,INC. $4,985.30 MECHANICAL PARTS 139964 GOLDEN COAST SAWDUST PROD. 38826E SAWDUST 139965 GOLDEN SOFTWARE,INC. SMM.w OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139D66 VAN GRAINGER.INC. 3173.10 COMPRESSOR PARTS 139967 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $278.31 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES fn 139%8 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $1,653.52 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES X 139969 GRASSY ST.I. $1.05160 INSTRUMENT PARTS x 139970 DGA CONSULTANTS $7.815.50 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-8-94 139971 DAVID R.GRIFFIN 368,11861 LEGAL SERVICES-UNITED TECH,TECHITE PIPE 139972 MAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $470.21 MECHANICAL PARTS —1 139973 HACHCOMPANY $857.39 LAB SUPPLIES 139974 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $10.39900 PUMP PARTS 139975 FREDAHARPER $1,50060 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION w 139976 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $192.46 LAB SUPPLIES 139977 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS 33,108.43 CONTAINER RENTALS 139978 PL HAM CO,INC. $8,688.66 FILTERS 139979 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 139980 HEWLETT PACKARD $1.470.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139981 HOKE CONTROLS DIVMOKE,INC. $152.20 VALVES 139982 HOME DEPOT $63.13 HARDWARE 139983 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,182,72 PAINT SUPPLIES 139984 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $21.595,50 WATER USE 139985 ORANGE COUNTY FED CREDIT UNION $60.OD DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 139986 IDEXX $408,43 LAB SUPPLIES 139987 IDM CONTROLS,INC. 3191.91 INSTRUMENTS 139988 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $109.770.58 FERRIC CHLORIDE MO.I t-18.92 139989 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFG. 32,628.23 FILTER 1399W INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 3317.87 CONNECTORS 139991 INFILCO DEGREMONT,INC. $489.60 MACHINE SUPPLIES 13D992 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $127.04 BATTERIES 13W93 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $13.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 139994 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $47.70 WATER USE 139995 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $409.19 PRINTING 139996 JAMISON ENGINEERING 38,113.79 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE M31/94 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/07AJ4 POSTING DATE 09/07/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 139997 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $947,44 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 13MB JAY'S CATERING $408,90 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 139999 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY SI94.45 ELECTRIC PARTS 14DO00 JOINT INSTRUMENTATION COMMITTEE $275.DO TRAINING REGISTRATION 140001 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $398.29 TOOLS 140002 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY $2.835.94 MACHINE SUPPLIES 140003 KARS'ADVANCED MATERIALS.INC. $999.75 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140M KELLY SERVICES $63360 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 140005 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER 5888.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 140006 KING BEARING,INC. $64256 MACHINE SUPPLIES 140007 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.569.96 TOOLS 140008 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $84,86 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 140009 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $188,28 PUMP PARTS 140D10 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $207.00 CHEMICALS 14D011 LANDMARK BANK $75.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 140012 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L.LAVOIE $498.70 LEGAL SERVICES-NITZEN 14WI3 LEGI-TECH 5840.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 140014 LEE S NO CONSULTING ENGR. $40.08860 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI.30-58 P140-1 fT 140015 LIFECOM-SAFETY SERVICE SUPP. $322.56 TEST EQUIPMENT X 140016 LIMITORQUE CORP. $646.50 ELECTRIC PARTS .�. 140017 K.P.LINDSTROM.INC. $3,505.25 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIRONMENTAL lb 140018 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 575,000.00 JEIP EMISSIONS TESTING M.O.7-13-94 140019 SOHO-LYNCH CORP. 5549.27 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140020 MPS $165.96 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES D 140021 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $303,71900 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 1 140022 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 54O21 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES D 140023 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $1.319.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140024 MICROAGE $4.626.79 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 14D025 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $1.749.93 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.11-18.92 140028 MIDWEST SCIENTIFIC $208,02 LAB SUPPLIES 140027 MILLTRONICS $237.30 INSTRUMENT 14D028 MISSION INDUSTRIES 53.208.30 UNIFORM RENTALS 140029 MONITOR LABS $10,48866 LAB EQUIPMENT 140030 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $1,105.00 LAB SERVICES 140D31 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $18.72 WATER USE 140D32 NORTON-LAMBERT CORP. $51.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140033 WM.W.NUGENT 8 CO. $387.95 TRUCK PARTS 140034 OI CORPORATION 870T00 LAB SUPPLIES 140035 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES f548.70 SAFETY GLASSES 140036 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $227,26 TRUCK PARTS 140037 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $969.75 CHEMICALS 140030 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2.111.13 ELECTRIC PARTS 140039 ORANGE VALVE S F"NO CO. $1.90540 FITTINGS 140040 OXYGEN SERVICE $5.471A2 SPECIALTY GASES 14DD41 COUNTY OF ORANGE $58.630.00 PROP ATTRIB.UPDATE M.O844-89 140D42 PSI $142.01 HARDWARE FUN �9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL )' PROCESSING DAM 1194 PAGE05 REPORT NUMBER Ap 3 JJJJ COUNTY SANRATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID ORM7/94 POSTING DATE 09WM WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 140N3 PSSI $6.456.00 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 140N4 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 89,34938 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140D45 PACIFIC WALK-IN MEDICAL $345,00 MEDICAL SERVICES 140046 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $1.343.53 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 140047 PAGENET 8848.17 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 140048 PAINE WEBBER 828,65144 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT 140049 PARAGON CABLE 838.7E CABLE SERVICES 140050 PARAMOUNT TANK,INC. 8405.2t TRUCK INSPECTION 140051 PARTS UNLIMITED $298,31 TRUCK PARTS MM52 PASCAL B LUDWIG $119.076,10 CONSTRUCTION P243-1 140053 PERKIN ELMER CORPORATION $25,300,47 LAB SUPPLIES 14MM PIMA GRO SYSTEMS.INC. S143.092B5 RESIDUALS REMOVALMO.5-8-91 140055 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE 84921 HARDWARE 140D56 POLY FABRICS $221.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140057 POLYPURE,INC. $24,158.48 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O M1-92 140058 POST CONSUMER PRODUCTS $7,671.90 PUBLIC INFORMATION SUPPLIES 140059 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $154.00 ICE fn 14OD60 PROFESSIONAL TREE CARE $8.000.00 LANDSCAPING SERVICES X 14MI PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $9,454,97 FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICESMO.641-94 2 140N2 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS 889.41 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 140063 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $1.056,88 LAB SUPPLIES 140064 RED WING SHOES 8116.37 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 14ON5 RELIANCE ELECTRIC 8110A2 INSTRUMENT PARTS D 14W66 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY 8t,922.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES I 140D67 RYAN-NERCO 81,07315 TRUCK PARTS Ln 14MO SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS $254,01 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140069 SANTA ANA RIVER FLOOD 81,100.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 140070 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $2.610.63 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140071 DOUG SARVIS 81,125.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 140072 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1,184.30 SPECIALTY OASES 140073 CITY OF SEAL BEACH 8274.30 WATER USE 140074 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2.856,31 HARDWARE 140075 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $4.356.53 TRUCK PARTS 140W6 SHIMADZU SCIENTIFIC INSTR. 818,570.15 LAB EQUIPMENT 140077 SHURELUCK SALES $10,760.64 PUMP PARTS 140078 SIMS WELDING SUPPLY $307.09 LAB SUPPLIES 140079 SKALAR,INC. $9.190.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140080 SOUTH COAST WATER $501.49 SERVICE AGREEMENT 14N81 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. 887,681.32 POWER 140082 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $11,343.66 NATURAL OAS 140083 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $23.595.26 DIESELJUNLEADED FUEL 140084 SOUTHWEST SCIENTIFIC $1.298.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140085 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 813.50 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 140086 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. 8250.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140081 WESTALLOY,INC. $197.16 WELDING SUPPLIES 140088 SPEX INDUSTRIES.INC. $359.81 LAB SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/31M PAGE06 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/07194 POSTING DATE 09107/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 140089 SQUARE D/CRISP AUTOMATION SYS. $6.338.68 COMPUTER SOFTWARE LICENSE 140D90 STERLING ART $87.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES 14DO91 STRATAGENE $397.58 LAB SUPPLIES 140092 GARY G.STREED $3,144.15 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 9 TRAVEL 140093 SUNSET FORD $220.10 TRUCK PARTS 14N94 SWIFT AUTO WORLD NORTH $11,334.35 TRUCK M.O.3.9.94 140095 TALENT TREE PERSONNEL SERVICES $2,255.25 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 1400M TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $359,50 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 14D097 TEKTRONIX.INC. $142,91 TOOLS 14009E TELEDYNE ANALMCAL $153,20 INSTRUMENT PARTS 14DO99 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $784.59 MECHANICAL PARTS 140100 TRANE $146.44 ELECTRIC PARTS 140101 TRANSMATION,INC. $279.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140102 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $830.98 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O64494 140103 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3.455.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.5.11.94 140IN TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $253,54 TRUCK PARTS 140105 JO TUCKER 6 SON.INC. $263.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS fTl 140IN CITY OF TUSTIN $2,164.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS 140107 TUSTIN DODGE $51.63 TRUCK PARTS = 140108 TWINING LABORATORIES $12.249.59 SOIL TESTING M.O.743.94 140109 U.S C.SPONSORED PROJECTS ACCT. $11.337,43 AIR TOXICS PROGRAM M 0.11.10-93 DO 140110 UHLER.INC. $6.044,50 CONSTRUCTION 532&5-33 -I 140111 UNISOURCE WOR BUTLER PAPER 8756.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES D 140112 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $566.33 PARCEL SERVICES 1 140113 VWR SCIENTIFIC F4,703.08 LAB SUPPLIES Cl 140114 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $3.911.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140115 VALVTEK CORM.CONTROLS $1,200.76 INSTRUMENT 140IIS VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 31,021.72 LAB SUPPLIES 140117 VERNE'S PLUMBING $75.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 140118 VILLAGE NURSERIES $152.68 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 140119 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $995.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 140120 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $88.930.25 CHEMICALS M.O.3.9-94 140121 WEFTEC'94 C/O GALAXY $1.445.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140122 WEST COAST TERMINALS,INC. $373.95 OFFICE MACHINE 140123 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. 8375.00 TRUCK PARTS 140124 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $28,645.11 CAUSTIC SODA 6 HYPOCHLORITE M.0.8-12.9284.13.94 140125 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $267.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140126 WITEG $950.77 LAB SUPPLIES 140127 ROURKE,WOODRUFF 6 SPRAOLIN $58,036 04 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 140128 XEROX CORP. $19,271.68 COPIER LEASES 140129 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $1,055,53 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1401M YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS $310.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140131 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $588.68 PRINTING SUPPLIES 140132 RICHARD S.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID DWOD94 $2.843.01169 FUN 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8131/94 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OW07194 POSTING DATE 09/07PN SUMMARY AMOUNT 81 OPER FUND $11.077.77 82 OPER FUND 38.023 96 82 CAP FAC FUND 197.809]5 83 OPER FUND 80.823.61 83 CAP FAC FUND 76.660.02 85 OPER FUND 12.543.91 85 CAP FAC FUND 7,486.50 86 OPER FUND 4,349.18 87 OPER FUND 17,657.15 87 CAP FAC FUND 114.728.85 811 OPER FUND 21.207.51 911 CAP FAC FUND 11.485.67 013 OPER FUND 1.358.14 914 OPER FUND 2.498.00 f*1 014 CAP FAC FUND 211.312.45 X 85f6 OPER FUND 2,422.15 s 8586 CAP FAC FUND 179.993.71 w 9697 OPER FUND 2.649.90 87814 OPER FUND 4.164.04 JT OPER FUND 635.918.47 n CORF 961,002.24 1 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 46.057.61 u JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 189.669.10 f2,643,011.89 FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114194 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09121M4 POSTING DATE 09/21194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140165 A B G INDUSTRIES $947.12 SAMPLER PARTS 140166 MAD SYSTEMS $526.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140167 AS TECH COMPANY $69.904.75 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 140165 AT&T $799.78 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 140169 AIR CLEANING SPECIALISTS $641.33 ELECTRIC PARTS 140170 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $17,788.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST,M.O.S.9.89 140171 ALDRICH CHEMICAL CO. $123.72 LAB SUPPLIES 140172 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO.LTD. $1,280,07 MANHOLE COVERS 140173 ALTA-ROBBINS $246,60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140174 AMER ASSOC.OF ENGINEERING SOC. 3169.00 TECHNICAL JOURNAL 140175 AMERICAN WATERWORKS ASSOC. $405.08 TECHNICAL JOURNAL 140176 ANSYS $102.15 LAB SUPPLIES 140177 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $195.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140178 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $767.68 VALVES 140179 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1.264.08 NOTICES&ADS 140180 ART MANUFACTURERS $71.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 140181 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140182 RUDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $633.62 LAB SUPPLIES X 140183 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.214.60 PAYROLL SERVICES 2 140184 AWARDS TROPHIES $6030 PLAGUES 140185 BKK LANDFILL $3.352.18 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9�91 140166 BABCOCK DISPLAY PRODUCTS INC. $6.618,24 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 140187 BANANA BLUEPRINT $1,866.05 PRINTING M.O.10.10-90 140188 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 31,698.4t BATTERIES �i 140189 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1,865.92 LAB SUPPLIES 140190 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $164.98 LAB SUPPLIES 140191 BELL SECURITY $3.666.05 SECURITY SERVICES 140192 BENTLEY NEVADA $585.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS 14D193 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $1.236,15 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140194 JEAN BETTENHOUSEN $840 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 140195 BLACK&VEATCH $4.544.33 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146 140196 BOERINGER MANNHEIM $128.68 LAB SUPPLIES 140197 BORLAND INTERNATIONAL $501.69 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140198 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $23.189.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-22 140199 BRISTOL INDUSTRIES $244.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 140200 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.515,00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 140201 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $390,00 SUBSCRIPTION 140202 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $557.19 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140203 C.P.I. $487.65 LAB SUPPLIES 140204 CS COMPANY $17,093.16 VALVES 140205 CALTROL,INC. $1,683,84 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140200 JOHN R.CALPRICE PHD $10.000.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.OA 1.14.90 140207 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $1.247.76 TRUCK REPAIRS 140209 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $1.434.71 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140209 CALSCIENCE ENVIRONMENTAL LABS $2,660.00 LAB SERVICES 140210 CASHCO 3558'" VALVE FUI ) 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114194 PAGE 02 j REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 092194 POSTING DATE 0921/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 140211 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. S7DB.BD OFFICE FURNITURE 140212 CENTURY SAFETY INST.B SUPPLY $8,568.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140213 CERFNET 540.70 COMPUTER SERVICES 140214 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. 5980.00 PUMP PARTS 140215 COAST RUBBER STAMP $59.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140216 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $840.00 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140217 COMPUTER POWER,INC. $215.01) INSTRUMENT PARTS 140218 COMPUSA,INC. $263.09 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 140219 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 112,995A5 ELECTRIC PARTS 140220 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. 1139.57 TOOLS 140221 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $2.230.43 CHLORINE M.O.10-11.93 140222 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. 51.525.81 ENGINE PARTS 140223 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $633.82 TRUCK PARTS 140224 COUNTY INVESTMENTS-1 $15.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 140225 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $125 74 ELECTRIC PARTS 1402M CHARLES P.CROWLEY CO. $14.39 PUMP PARTS 140227 DAILY PILOT $88.00 NOTICESBADS 140228 DAPPER TIRE $932,51 TIRES ITI 140229 DATASTORM 576.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE x 140230 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 94.912.51 ANIONIC POLYMER M.OA-11.93 140231 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $525,39 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140232 DOLLINGER CORP. $962.72 FILTERS 140233 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY 5120.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 1402M ESP NORTH $1.133.13 MECHANICAL SUPPLIESROOLS 14D235 EASTMAN.INC. $2.585.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES N 140236 ECOANPLYSIS,INC. $4,27815 CONSULTING SERVICES 140238 EDWARDSNCHANT R.INC. GS BL00 SYS. $4.480.00 SERVICOCEAN AGREEMENTMONITORING 140239 ENCHANTER.INC. 84,430,00 CCEITALPR PROJECT IMPROVEMENT 140239 ERNST 8 YOUNG f$9,503.78 CAPITAL PROJECT 0ICES MENT M.0.84L9d 140241 JOSEPHEINC. AN 511175.78 ENGINEERING SERVICES 140242 FALCON EVANS 5675,00 DEFERRED C REMOVAL M RAWAL 140242 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $190.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.1&&91 GHT 140244 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $150,41 AIR JANITORIAL 140245 FIRST CO IEN NORTHERN DIST. $503.0 LAB SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 140245 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. .740.07 LAB SUPPLIES 140246 ECOSYSTEMS $7,740.77 PUMP PARTS 140247 CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $1,212.50 SURVEYING SERVICES M 0.6-&94 140240 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $201.53 PHOTO SUPPLIES 140249 FREEDOM IMAGING $64.80 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140250 GST.INC. $1.885.94 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140251 GANAHL LUMBER CO. 544.49 LUMBEWHARDWARE 140252 THE GARTNER GROUP $5.000,00 PROCESS AUTOMATION CONSULTING 140253 GAS PURIFICATION ENO.CO. 5453.1E ELECTRIC PARTS 140254 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. 5840.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 140255 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4.638.35 TELEPHONE SERVICES 140258 GIERLICHWITCHELL.INC. $1,075.02 PUMP PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114/94 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0921194 POSTING DATE 0221194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 140251 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES $108.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140258 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $623.87 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 140259 GRASSY S.T.I. $459.00 ENGINE PARTS 10260 DGA CONSULTANTS $7.020.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-8-94 140261 GROTH EQUIPMENT CORP. 52,21M,57 VALVES 140262 HATCH&KIRK INC. $1.996,93 ENGINE PARTS 140263 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $3.59000 CONTAINER RENTALS 140264 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $12,726.76 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140265 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 140265 HILTI,INC. $2.74614 TOOLS 140267 HOME DEPOT $416.02 HARDWARE 140260 RS HUGHES CO.INC. $520,43 PAINT SUPPLIES 140269 HUGHES AIRCRAFT 43 5400.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 140270 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $822.75 WATER USE 140271 IDEXX 5406.13 LAB SUPPLIES 140272 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $70.424.19 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18.92 140273 INDUSTRIAL AIR COMPRESSOR $1.597.20 COMPRESSOR PARTS m 140274 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $416A7 CONNECTORS x 140275 INGRAM PAPER $660.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 2 140276 INSIDE E.PA. $87300 PUBLICATION 140277 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $406,60 BATTERIES 140278 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $66.82 WATER USE -1 140279 JH RECOGNITION CO. $81045 EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS 1 0280 JAMISON ENGINEERING 530,420.06 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1 402B1 JANDEL SCIENTIFIC $444,23 OFFICE EQUIPMENT W 140202 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $262,86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140283 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $639.56 ELECTRIC PARTS 140284 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY $171.23 MECHANICAL PARTS 140285 KEEN-KUT ABRASIVE CO. 5404.08 TOOLS 140286 KING BEARING,INC. $1.878,26 MACHINE SUPPLIES 140287 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 8g536.63 BUILDING MATERIALS 140288 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $310.45 PUMP PARTS 140289 LA TRONICS $557.00 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 140290 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO. $215.64 TRUCK PARTS 140291 K.P.LINDSTROM.INC. $3,165.10 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIRONMENTAL 140292 MC NOTTINGHAM CO. $197.95 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 140293 MPS $41.00 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 140294 MACOMCO $689.59 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140295 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS.INC. 53,012.91 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 140296 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 514.37 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140297 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $1.571.61 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 140298 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $3,518.27 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 140299 MIDWEST SCIENTIFIC SI81.14 LAB SUPPLIES 140300 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,717.85 UNIFORM RENTALS 140301 MLADEN BUNHCH CONSTRUCTION $1,503.634.50 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-IA 140302 MONITOR LABS $2.244.47 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES FUN, )9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9114194 PAGE04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAIDOBaiM POSTING DATE 09nI194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 140303 PAUL MONROE $107.49 ENGINE PARTS 140304 BOB MONTGOMERY,WIC,INC. 185.81 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 140305 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES 11,360.00 LAB SERVICES 140306 MORROW-MEADOWS CORP. $36,00010 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES M.0.1-12-94 140307 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. 140.63 HARDWARE 140308 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 140309 NEWPORTICOSTA MESA YMCA $19.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 140310 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 152.89 WATER USE 140311 ORACLE CORPORATION $14.242,22 COMPUTER SOFTWARE SUPPORT 140312 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL f1,018.95 CHEMICALS 140313 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $55.18 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 140314 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $4.689.16 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140315 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $729.81 FITTINGS 140316 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $19,80864 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 140317 COUNTY OF ORANGE $1,766.50 PERMIT FEES 14031E ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $49,24500— GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9-93 140319 POO SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION 19484 LAB SUPPLIES 140320 PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH LABS $432.00 LAB SUPPLIES m 140321 PSI f134.30 HARDWARE X 140322 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $225.53 OPERATING SUPPLIES 2 140324 PSSI f091.26 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 14032a PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. f5,891.28 PUMP PARTS —1 140325 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $3.094,30 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140326 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $166.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 140327 PARAMOUNT $2.42222 MECHANICAL REPAIRS t 140326 PARTS UNLIMITED 119890 TRUCK PARTS 140329 PASCAL B LUDWIG.INC. $434.001.94 CONSTRUCTION PI-38-2 140330 KPMG PEAT MARWICK CPA $15,076.00 AUDITING SERVICES M.0.2-9-93 140331 PHIONICS,INC. $775.19 LAB SUPPLIES 140332 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. f154,322.33 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5.8.91 140333 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $242.57 OPERATING SUPPLIES 140334 POLYPURE,INC. $13.140.72 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 140335 POWER TRANSMISSION SPECIALTIES 3262,35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 14D336 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $64,00 ICE 140337 PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEMS S55A5 INSTRUMENT PART 140338 PULSAFEEDER $3,035.19 PUMP PARTS 140339 QUEST MEDIAE SUPPLIES $660,33 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 140340 RD SYSTEMS,INC. $215.50 CARD READER REPLACEMENT 140MI RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $2.370,43 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIRS 140M2 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1.715,43 TRASH REMOVAL 140343 TRW-REOI PROPERTY DATA $766,46 USER FEE DATA INDEXES 140344 9GLTDELIVERY $43.50 FREIGHT 140345 REISH MARINE STUDIES.INC. $64000 OCEAN MONITORING 140346 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $729.90 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140M7 RENOLD,INC. $542.08 MOTOR 140346 ROYCE PRODUCTIONS $733.51 PUBLIC RELATIONS MATERIALS FUND NO 9199 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/14/94 PAGE 05 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0912U94 POSTING DATE 09721I94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 14W49 SAS INSTITUTE.INC, f2,588.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 140350 SAN DIEGO SAFETY COUNCIL f800.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 140351 SARBS-PDC $320.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140352 SANTA FE BAG CO. $214.10 HARDWARE 140353 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1.174.67 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140354 SANWA BANK $167,070.50 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 14-t-IA 140355 SARSTEDT f124.03 LAB SUPPLIES 140356 SARTORIUS CORP. f258.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT I40357 DOUG SARVIS f1,50000 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 140358 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $402,434.08 OCEAN MONITORING M 069-93 140359 SEA COAST DESIGNS $321.10 OFFICE FURNITURE 140360 SETHCO DIVIMET PRO $127.21 LAB SUPPLIES 140361 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $386.93 TOOLS 140362 SHIMADZU SCIENTIFIC INSTR. $2,671.83 LAB SUPPLIES 140353 SHURELUCK SALES $4.268.36 TOOLSOIARDWARE 140364 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. 314SA2 LAB SUPPLIES 140365 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $5.559.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 14DMB SHAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $19.93 TOOLS m 140N7 SO4ALAIRGAS 111,684A3 WELDING SUPPLIES X 140368 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $13,105,68 PERMIT FEES 2 140370 $0 CALIF. CALIF EDICO. CO. f12A3658 POWER 140371 SO CALIF.AS CO.CO. i32.83BA7 POWER 140372 SO,CAL.GAS CO.MARINE f115,586A7 NATURAL GAS w 140373 SO.CALIF.WATERDOINSi. f2,117710 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 140374 SO.CALIF.WATER COUNTIES f77.30 WATER USE Lj1 140375 SOUTHERNRKLETS DRINKING WATER TE $2.653,00 DI INKING EADEDFUEL 140376 SPARKLET IN DRINKING WRIER 52.953.00 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 140378 SPARLIND INDUSTRIES. CO.,INC. f$864.08 METERS 140377 SPEK INDUSTRIES,INC. f884.53 LAB SUPPLIES 14037E SQUARE D/CRISP AUTOMATION SYS $2W.357 34 COMPUTER SOFTWARE LICENCE M.D]-1194 140390 SRECO $541.34 MECHANICAL PARTS 140381 GARY 0 ST E 1 f54B.88 LAB SUPPLIES 140382 GAMY IT STREED $1,190 71 REIMB PETTY CASH,TRAINING 6 TRAVEL 140383 SUPER ICE CO f1,190.71 METAL N0384 SUPER ICE CORP. f9022 LAB SUPPLIES 140385 SYMTALE NTNT TR CORP. 831.87 TEMPORARY SOETWARE RSONN 140388 TAYLOR-D NNMFG.. NNELCOMP SERVICES .631.B7 TEECTRIC YPERSONNEL 140388 TEKTRON3UNNC. COMPANY f$1.39200 ELECTRICNT PARTS M.0.84).94 I40387 TEXAS NA INC. f7,122,72 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140389 TEXAS MECHANICAL CONTROLS f840.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 14030 THOMPSONMDUSTRICL SUPPLY f$42602 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 140391 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $232,50 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 140392 THOMPSON INTERNATIONAL GROUP $431.15 PUBLICATION 140393 TRAVEL INTERNATIONAL f431.15 TRAVEL 1403M TRAVEL AUTO SUPPLY. f81100 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.Bb-94 140394 TRUCK 8AUT0 SUPPLY,INC. f22/.35 TRUCK PARTS r - FUI, �9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL REPORT PROCESSING DATAPI3A14 PAGE08 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMSPAID092UB4 POSTING DATE 0921/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 140395 TRUESDAIL LABS $4.259.52 LAB SERVICES 1403% JO TUCKER B SON,INC. $2.618.33 WELDING SUPPLIES 140397 TUSTIN DODGE $54.55 TRUCK PARTS 140398 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT $227.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 140399 UNISOURCE WOR BUTLER PAPER $147.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140400 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $258.38 PARCEL SERVICES 140401 UNITED SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $100.31 LAB SUPPLIES 140402 VWR SCIENTIFIC $71L87 LAB SUPPLIES 140403 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1,900.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140404 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2.720,43 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 140405 VILLAGE NURSERIES $54.55 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 1404DS VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS 559.59IL43 CHEMICALS M.O.19-94 140407 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 928,182.91 CAUSTIC SODA 8 HYPOCHLORITE M.O.8-12-92 81-1Y91 140408 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $147,73 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140409 WHESSOE VAREC 932000 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140410 WORDPERFECT $252.00 PUBLICATIONS 140411 XEROX CORP. $829.26 COPIER LEASES 140412 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $1,684.86 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES X 140413 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $152,62 COMMUNICATION SUPPLIES = 140,114 2YMARK CORP. $9362.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT ].9BS,a0B.SO bU � SUMMARY AMOUNT p1 42 OPER FUND 31,69 92 CAP FAC FUND 76,95 93 OPER FUND 19.573.15 93 CAP FAC FUND 9.70149 15 OPER FUND 12.994-69 91 OPER FUND 234.00 97 CAP FAC FUND 52.245 00 911 OPER FUND 1.022.40 011 CAP FAC FUND 25.88 014 OPER FUND 32.13 914 CAP FAC FUND 1,678,207.76 9566 CAP FAC FUND 922.32 07814 OPER FUND 260.97 JT OPER FUND 1.258 439.69 CORF 620,379.07 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 2L891.87 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 110,107.43 $3A85,106.56 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA NOVEMBER 9, 1994 Agenda Item (8): Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts (each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. Summary See attached listing of claim payments. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of payment of claims listing. ww�'�saase�iira FUND NO 919tl"- JT DIST WOWING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 929R4 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10NS194 POSTING DATE 1010L94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140441 AG TECH COMPANY $61,TNLw RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.9�91 140442 AT&T-PROWATTS S4,308.41 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 140443 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $971.46 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 140444 A T&T-CELLULAR CR&R $2.02 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 140445 ABRASIVE ENG.,TOOL&EQUIP $431.82 PAINT SUPPLIES 140446 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS $473.116.08 CONSTRUCTION Pt-36-1 140447 AIR CLEANING SPECIALISTS $641.33 ELECTRIC PARTS 14WS AIR PRODUCTS B CHEMICALS $17,788.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M 0.8-9-89 140 19 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $928.09 CONSTRUCTION P2.53-1 14US) AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $546.46 BUILDING MATERIALS 140451 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $330.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 14NU APCOVALVE B PRIMER CORP. S1,644.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140453 ADS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $1.374.89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140454 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $543.51 INSTRUMENT 14W56 ARMOR-VAC $702.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 140456 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $164.87 ELECTRICSUPPUES 140457 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $1,128.80 WASTE REMOVAL 140458 ASSOCIATED VACUUM TECH.,INC. $592.94 FITTINGS 140459 AWARDS&TROPHIES $34.28 PLAQUES 14N60 BKK LANDFILL S3.072.46 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.9-91 14NSI BRW SAFETY&SUPPLY $728.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140462 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $639. 0 BATTERIES 140463 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4.555.09 LAB SUPPLIES 140464 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $589.76 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 140405 BELLCO GLASS,INC. $164.41 LAB SUPPLIES 140M BELL SECURITY $1,662.64 SECURITY SERVICES 140467 GENTLY NEVADA $34949 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140068 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $1.144.28 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140469 DAVID SIHL $13,000.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 140470 810 TECH NET,INC. $8.33 SERVICEAGREEMENT 140471 BLACK&VEATCH S3,652.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES I2&1 140472 BLOOMBERG LP. $4,832.59 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.0.414.93 140673 BORNEMANN PUMPS,INC. $240.27 PUMP PARTS 140474 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $40,433.78 ENGINEERING SERVICES PIAI 140475 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $321.58 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140476 BNI BOOKS $134.49 TECHNICAL BOOKS 140477 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $194.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 141M78 BUSH&ASSOCIATES.INC. $7,436.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.68-94 14N79 BUYCHEM DISTRIBUTORS $1.629.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140480 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 14USI C.P.I. $96929 LAB SUPPLIES 140402 CS COMPANY $6.119.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 141M83 CAD VENTURES $969.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES 140484 CALTROL,INC. $396.88 REGULATOR PARTS 14W85 CARLETON ENGINEERS $782.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 140486 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $W.605.03 ENGINEERING SERVICES J3 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 929194 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/0 POSTING DATE 10/05I94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140087 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $420.23 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140488 LORETTA L.COFFMAN $137.92 PUBLICATION 14W89 COLICH&SONS $561,272AD CONSTRUCTION 2-9-111 140490 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $4,590.05 HARDWARE 140491 COMPUSA,INC. $524.63 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 140492 COMPUSERVE $207.23 .COMPUTER SERVICES 140493 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $15.51 TRUCK PARTS 14NN CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $85.92 ELECTRIC PARTS 140495 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $147.44 FREIGHT 140496 CONSTRUCTION FABRICATORS,INC. $13,309.28 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140497 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $264.34 TOOLS 140498 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL 00. $2.602.16 CHLORINE MO.10.11.93 140499 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C E2,51ISAS CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8.11.93 140NO CONVEYOR COMPONENTS CO. 83,098.75 ELECTRIC PARTS 140501 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $89.715.10 ENGINESIENGINE PARTS M.0.641.88 140502 COSTAR CORP. $107.75 LAB SUPPLIES 14MO3 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $1.326.32 COMPRESSOR PARTS 1405N COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.337.72 ELECTRIC PARTS 140505 CURRENT PROTOCOLS $371.00 SUBSCRIPTION 1405M DME,INC. $2.695.51 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140507 D.T.I. $60.00 CHEMICALS 140508 J.W.D'ANGELO CO.,INC. 5588.08 BUILDING MATERIALS 140509 OVALS SALES COMPANY $4.66 FREIGHT 140510 DOUGIAS J.DAVIS&ASSOC.,INC. $4.074.30 CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ASSESSMENT 14-1-1A 140511 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $15,050.37 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 140512 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. 534,742.95 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN 140513 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1,708.98 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140514 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE,INC, $5,372.48 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL M.0.1-13.92 140515 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $716.27 PAINT SUPPLIES 140516 ESP NORTH $304.66 ELECTRIC PARTS 140517 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING $103.59 LAB SUPPLIES 140518 EASTMAN.INC. $3,816.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140519 ENCHANTER,INC. S4,480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6.10.92 1405M ENVIRONMENTAL PROD.USA $2,067.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140521 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $750.50 LAB SERVICES 140522 FLUID TECH.SALES $1,103.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140523 MARSHALL FAIRRES $78.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 140524 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 51.820.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9.91 140525 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $98.50 AIR FREIGHT 14D526 FIRST CHOICE 5366.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 14D527 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $1.116.18 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 140528 FISHER SCIENTIFI000. f048.19 LAB SUPPLIES 14D529 FLO-SYSTEM6 S222.62 PUMP PARTS 140 M FOUNTAINVALLEY CAMERA &156.27 PHOTO SUPPLIES 140531 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY S25,294.SB WATER USE 140532 lr THE FOXBORO 00. $1,518.10 ELECTRIC PARTS FUND NO 9199 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE MIMNI PAGE 03 REMRTNUMBERM43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID t01O5194 POSTINGOATE 10/05194 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140533 CITY OF FULLERTON $357.01 WATER USE 14D534 FURON DEKORON $1,791.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1405M GET,INC. $82.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140536 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $2.421.99 LUMBERI ARDWARE 140637 GEAR TECH $800.00 MECHANICAL INSPECTION 140538 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $175.17 ELECTRIC PARTS 140539 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $119.19 TELEPHONE SERVICES 14DUO GENICOM CORPORATION $507.29 PRINTING SUPPLIES 140541 GIERLICH-MRCHELL,INC. $8,027.99 MECHANICAL PARTS 14 12 VAN GRAINGER.INC. $61.85 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140543 GRASBY S.T.I. $3,626.00 ENGINE PARTS MOW DGA CONSULTANTS $5,270.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6&94 140M5 DON GREEK 6 ASSOC. $29,147.W ENGINEERING SERVICES 3.36R 140M DAVID R.GRIFFIN $17.616.0 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE PIPE 140547 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $185.84 MUCK PARTS 140548 HACH COMPANY $500.04 OPERATION SUPPLIES 140519 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $450.07 ELECTRIC PARTS 140550 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $5,011.50 PUMP PARTS 140551 FREDA HARPER $1,500.OD DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1405U SIM J.HARRIS CO. $967.46 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT 140553 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $1,6TJ.92 ENGINE PARTS 1405M PL HAWN 00.INC. $139.43 FILTERS 140M5 HEWIETT PACKARD $1,470.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140556 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE $1,324.78 TRUCK PARTS 140557 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $436.69 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140558 HOKE CONTROLS DIV.AIOKE,INC. $144.01 VALVES 140559 MARGARET M.HOLM $5,0004D LABILITY SETTLEMENT 140HO HO ES B NARVER,INC. $64,633.42 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pt-44 140MI HOME DEPOT $203.78 SMALL HARDWARE 140562 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $317.07 PAINT SUPPLIES 140563 ORANGE COUNTY FED CREDIT UNION $680.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 140564 IC MEYERS PROPERTIES $75.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 14D585 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $80,941.72 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 140566 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $955.22 CONNECTORS 140567 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $261.21 TRUCK PARTS 140568 INORGANICVENTURES $139.00 LAB SUPPUES 140569 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $561.97 BATTERIES 140570 INVITROGEN $105.W LAB SUPPLIES 140571 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $S.X WATERUSE IC572 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $1,060.80 PRINTING 140573 JAMISON ENGINEERING $13.662.95 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140574 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $321.12 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140575 JAYS CATERING $170.35 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 140576 JERSEY LABSUPPLY $115.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140577 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $186.87 ELECTRIC PARTS 10578 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $162.24 TOOLS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9129194 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/05194 POSTING DATE IWOSIW WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140579 KAMAN BEARINGS S SUPPLY 5133.35 MACHINE SUPPLIES 140580 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS 11273.33 MOTOR REPAIRS 140581 KIMMEL-MOTZ REFRIGERATION $433.93 MACHINE REPAIRS 1405B2 KING BEARING,INC. $57.58 MACHINE SUPPLIES 140583 KIRST PUMP S MACHINE WORKS $1,21az4 PUMP PARTS 1405M KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,738.09 TOOLS 140585 LCDPOWERSYSTEMS $1,100.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140586 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $966.37 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 140587 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $1,570.74 PUMP PARTS 1405H LAKEWOOD INSTRUMENTS $203.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140509 LAW/CRANDALL,INC. $1,695.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.7-134N 140590 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L.LAVOIE 5534.52 LEGAL SERVICES-NITZEN 140591 LEE S RO CONSULTING ENGR. 287,57288 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140.1 140592 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. 115,7N.30 DEFERRED COMP TRUSTEE TRANSFER 140593 LOCALAGENCY M.00 LAFCO FEES 1405N4 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL S970.00 OCEANMONITORINGM.O.6-I0.Q 140595 MACOMCO 5877.20 SERVICEAGREEMENT 1405M MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. 5571,156.OD CONSTRUCTION P242-2 140597 MARKON COMPUTER SCIENCE $197.00 OFFICE MACHINE 140590 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $197.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140599 MATT-CHLOR,INC. 52,154.88 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 140600 MCKENNA EHOR.B EQUIP. $3.790.69 PUMP PARTS 14MI MCWELCO RACK4NSOX CO. $2.054.50 TOOLBOXES 140602 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $2.657.53 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1406W MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING 2770.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 140B04 MILLTRONICS 5645A5 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 14WS MISCO $2,543.49 OFFICE FURNRURE 14=6 MISSION INDUSTRIES IM.W3.33 UNIFORM RENTALS 140607 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO. SIASS.4O SUBSCRIPTION 14MO MONTGOMERY WATSON $44,134.29 AIR TOXICS PROJECT M.0.12.12-90 140609 MURPHY INDUSTRIAL COATINGS $4,700.00 PAINT REMOVAL 140610 NASCO WEST,INC. $305.11 LAB SUPPLIES 140811 NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S 589.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140612 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $370.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 140613 NEALSUPPLYCO. 554.75 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140614 NEUTRON $7,118.54 CHEMICALS 14MIS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $5.29 WATER USE 140816 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $307.70 SAFETY GLASSES 140617 OMEGA ENGINEERING,INC. $194.61 EOUIPMENTREPAIRS 140818 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $139.25 TRUCK PARTS 140819 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $2,348.65 CHEMICALS 140820 ORANGECOUNTYWHOLESALE $3,182.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 14=1 ORANGE COURIER $133.65 COURIER SERVICES 140822 ORION PRINTING 8 DESIGN $1,153.28 PRINTING 140623 ORANGE OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 3621.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 140624 OXYGEN SERVICE 5415.63 SPECIALTY GASES FUND NO 910 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/ 9194 PAGE 05 REPORTNUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/05194 POSTING DATE 10/05194 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140625 ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH CARE AGCY $1,620.00 SLUDGE SPILL REPORT 140626 PGC SCIENTIFICS CORPORATION $402.50 LAB SUPPLIES 140627 PSSI 53,568.50 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 140628 PACIFIC PARTS $3,179.03 INSTRUMENT PARTS 14W29 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $1,516.02 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140630 PACIFIC BELL $151.59 TELEPHONE SERVICES 14W31 PACIFICWALK-IN MEDICAL $130.00 MEDICAL SERVICES 140632 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $280.00 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 140633 PAGENET $1,175.84 PAGER RENTALS 140634 PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $42.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 140635 PARAGON CABLE S36.78 CABLE SERVICES 140636 PARTS UNLIMITED $707.37 MUCK PARTS 140837 PASCALSLUDWIG $122,031.36 CONSTRUCTION PIJM 14W38 PASCAL AND LUDWIG $64,992.10 CONSTRUCTION 1`243.1 14W39 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $720.75 LAB SUPPLIES 140840 PERMA SEAL $1,091.77 LURE OIL 14W41 PIMA GIRD SYSTEMS,INC. $149,897.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5.8-91 14W42 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LABSUPPUES 140643 POLYPURE,INC. $24,596.05 CATIONIC POLYMER M 0.1l1-92 140W4 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5.ODD.00 POSTAGE 140645 PREMIERSTEEL $1.353.74 METAL 140646 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $6,827.77 FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.6894 140647 QUESTRON CORP. $108.00 LAB REPAIRS M4 8 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $160.55 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 14W49 OR SHWAJI RAMALINGAM $324.50 LAB SUPPLIES 14W50 REOWINGSHCES $229.30 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 140651 ROYCE INSTRUMENT $621.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1411652 RYAN-NERCO $640.90 PUMP PARTS 140853 SAN DIEGO SAFETY COUNCIL $17,123.04 TRAINING REGISTRATION 14W54 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $3,48539 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 14W55 R.CRAIG SCOTT B ASSOC. $23,709.45 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 140 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $I.M.78 SPECIALTY GASES 14W57 SHURELUCK SALES $10.7N.39 TOOLSRIAROWARE 14W58 SIDU MFG CO. $2,044.56 TOOLS 14W59 SIGMA CHEMICAL OO. $63.33 LAB SUPPLIES 14MO SIMS WELDING SUPPLY $34.W BIOFILTRATION PART 140561 SKALAR,INC. $188.41 LAB REPAIRS 14W62 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $35.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 140883 SMITH PIPE 8 SUPPLY $391.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 14W64 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $96,286.82 POWER 140665 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $2,004.60 NATURAL GAS 140666 SOUTHLAND SHADE $148.48 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 141)(67 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $6,196.30 METER 140668 WESTALLOY,INC. $996.17 WELDING SUPPLIES 140569 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $815.61 LAB SUPPLIES 14W7D SPIRE TECHNOLOGIES SYS.DIV. $3.529.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT FUNDNO 91M - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9129194 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IORK 94 POSTING DATE 1010544 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140671 STEVENS WATER MONITORING SYS. $919.01 SCALE REPAIRS 140672 STRATAGENE 5348.67 LAB SUPPLIES 140673 GARY G.STREED $2.731.39 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL 140674 SUNSET FORD $58.10 TRUCK PARTS 140675 TCHASSOCIATES 5464.80 LAB SUPPLIES 140676 TRW SPACE B ELECTRONICS GROUP $1.510.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140677 TALENT TREE PERSONNEL SERVICES $1.853.15 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL 140678 TEKTRONIX,INC. $696.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140579 THOMAS FISH COMPANY $107.25 LAB SUPPLIES 140680 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 51,066.79 MECHANICAL PARTS 140 BI THORPE INSULATION SIS6.47 PIPE 140682 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $3.828.60 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6AWN 14W83 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $247.35 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 14MM TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. 5423.32 TRUCK PARTS 140685 TRUESDAILLASS $998.94 LAB SERVICES 14MM JG TUCKER B SON,INC. 52,998.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS 14W87 TUSTIN DODGE $12.22 TRUCK PARTS 140588 TWINING LABORATORIES $16,429.72 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-1194 140589 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $118.96 TRUCK PARTS 14MM UNISOURCE WOR BUTLER PAPER $1.062.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140691 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $305.14 PARCEL SERVICES 14%92 US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 5480.00 SUBSCRIPTION 14N93 VWR SCIENTIFIC $237.39 LAB SUPPLIES 14NN VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $3.168.04 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140895 VILLAGE NURSERIES $126.88 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 14MM VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $49.609.14 CHEMICALS M.O.34-04 14097 WATERS CORPORATION $7,450.57 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140698 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $29.757.99 CAUSTIC SODA 6 HYPOCHLORIDE M.08-12428 M13.94 140699 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $460.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140700 JOHN WILEY 8 SONS,INC. 5238.13 PUBLICATION 140701 WIRTH GAS EQUIPMENT $204.20 ENGINE PARTS 140702 WITEG $127.15 LAB SUPPLIES 140703 ROURKE.WOODRUFF 8 SPRADLIN $60,729.37 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19.92 1407N XEROX CORP. $597.27 COPIER LEASES 140705 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $878.02 CHARTS 1407N RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10105184 33,241,821.60 FUND NO 91" - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9M9 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/OS POSTING DATE 10GWI SUMMARY AMOUNT 02 OPER FUND $4.413.63 02 CAP FAG FUND 567,756.23 03 OPER FUND W.030.11 0 CAP FAC FUND 17.616.85 05 OPER FUND 5.318.15 05 CAP FAC FUND 14.00 07 OPER FUND 5,174.66 011 OPER FUND 15,755.81 011 CAP FAC FUND 452.00 014 OPER FUND 411LW 914 GAP FAC FUND 24.472.79 05&6 OPER FUND 2,491.20 AW CAP FAC FUND 4,919.74 0657 OPER FUND 2,838.39 07614 OPER FUND 4,861.93 n OPER FUND 637,371.26 CORP 1,670,621.89 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 53.693.92 J7 DIST WORKING CAPITAL 182,603.04 $3,241,821.60 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IIXI 4 PAGE O1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANfTATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID I0/1S194 POSTING DATE 1O119^M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140736 AG TECH COMPANY $60.457.14 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10."l 140737 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $39.029.09 CONSTRUCTION PIJ&1 140738 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $18,476.70 O&M AGREEMENT OKY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9E9 140739 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $142.567.50 CONSTRUCTION P2d3-1 W740 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $619.73 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 140741 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY 1497.00 PUBLICATION 140742 AMERSCO,INC. $193.05 LAB SUPPLIES 140743 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $1.619.10 SEWERREPAIRS 1407" MOLTER-DISTRIBUTION f1,953.38 OFFICE FURNITURE 140745 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $519.92 NOTICES&ADS 140746 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SEW. 535.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 140747 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140748 AUDIO VIDEO REPORTING SERVICE $96.59 PUBLICATION 140749 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.090.14 PAYROLL SERVICES 140750 BKKLANDFILL $4.986.68 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.101&91 140751 BANANA BLUEPRINT $2.869.0 PRINTINGM.OA1 10-90 140752 BARCLAYSLAWPUBLISHERS f12800 PUBLICATION 140763 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 5383.06 BATTERIES 140754 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $2.057.01 LAB SUPPLIES 140755 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $950.OD SERVICE AGREEMENT 140756 BID VENTURES,INC. $162.00 LAB SUPPLIES W757 BLACK&VEATCH f1,084.D8 ENGINEERING SERVICES P246 140758 BLAIR-MARTIN CO.,INC. $513.01 VALVES 140759 BOERINGERMANNHEIM SBW.49 LAB SUPPLIES 140760 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $416.51 TRUCK REPAIRS 140761 BON-A-RUES $49.05 TRUCK PARTS 140762 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. 939,349.99 ENGINEERING SERVICES 6-13&138 140763 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC..INC. f462.40 LAB SUPPLIES 140784 BUDGETJANITORIAL f875.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 140765 BUYCHEM DISTRIBUTORS 5815.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140766 CEPA $85.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140767 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 LAB SERVICES 140766 Dill $0 0.69 ELECTRIC PARTS 140769 G.P.I. $1.340.62 LAB SUPPLIES 140770 SRTC94-CWPCA,INC. 5410.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140771 CAD VENTURES $183.17 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 140772 CAERE CORP. $147.50 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 140773 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH.INC. $1.613.94 LAB SUPPLIES 140774 CALIFORNMAUTO COLLISION,INC. $412.37 TRUCK PARTS 140775 CALIF.ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS $1,316.61 MECHANICAL PARTS 1407M CALSCIENCE ENVIRONMENTAL LABS 5580.00 LAB SERVICES 140M CAPITAL WESTWARD f1175.64 MECHANICAL PARTS 140778 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $71.936.64 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38 140779 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. 5547.66 OFFICE FURNITURE 14WO CENTURY PAINT 5210.70 PAINTSUPPLIES 140761 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $1.379.75 SAFETY SUPPLIES FUND NO 91N - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10112194 PAGE 02 REPORTNUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10119AM POSTING DATE 1011901 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140782 COAST RUBBER STAMP $60.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES W783 COLICHBSONS $165.67569 CONSTRUCTION I1-17-1 140784 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA P99.96 PUMP PARTS 140785 COMPUSERVE $239.66 COMPUTER SERVICES 140785 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $57.78 TRUCK PARTS 140787 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $102.09 FREIGHT 140788 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $4,025.81 TOOLS 1407B9 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. 54,832.59 CHLORINE M.O.10611-e3 140790 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS $1,312.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140791 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $2.362,14 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11.93 1407M COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $20.337.91 ENGINE PARTS 140793 COSTA MESAAUTO SUPPLY 5448.85 TRUCK PARTS 140794 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC IRS." ELECTRIC PARTS 140705 STATE BOARD OF EQUAL17ATION $189.90 UNDERGROUNDFUELSTORAGEFEE 140708 DME,INC. $2,075.27 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140797 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $204.79 TRUCKPARTS 140798 DE GUELLE 8 SONS GLASS CO. $391.56 BUILDING REPAIRS 1407M DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $41,287.37 DENTAL INSURANCE PUN 140800 DIALOG INFORMATION SERVICES $73.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 140W1 COVER ELEVATOR COMPANY 5840.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 140802 DWYER INSTRUMENT,INC. $123.24 INSTRUMENT 140803 OVALS SALES $2,873.81 FITTINGS 140804 EGA(ENGINEERING DESIGN AUTO) $995.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 1408B5 E J L 8 ASSOC. $2,337.05 LAS SERVICES 14WN EASTMAN.INC. $7,855.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140807 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $890.90 TRUCK PARTS 140808 ECOANALYSIS,INC. $2,527.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 140809 SUMMER SCIENCE PUBLISHING $482.00 SUBSCRIPTION 140810 ENCHANTER,INC. $3.920.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.610.92 140811 ESSCO PUMPS AND CONTROLS $BB3.78 PUMP PARTS 140812 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING SUPPLY $91.10 LAB SUPPLIES 140813 EXCELLENCE IN TRAINING $20.00 TRAINING SUPPLIES 140814 EXCHANGER WORKS 8 FABRICATION 54W.W COMPRESSOR PARTS 140815 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $10.008.17 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.109-91 110818 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $42.75 AIR FREIGHT 140817 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $3.99 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 14081E FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $764.11 LAS SUPPLIES 140819 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $700.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 14=0 FLOSYSTEMS $3,101.42 PUMP PARTS 14=1 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $71.83 PHOTO SUPPLIES 14=2 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $625.00 FIRE PERMIT 140823 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $4.244.97 PAINT SUPPLIES 140824 FREDSON RV SUPPLY 5457.W TRUCK PARTS 140825 GST,INC. $072.20 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140826 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $27.85 PRINTING 1411827 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $324.27 ELECTRIC PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/12184 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10119M POSTING DATE 10119M WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140828 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,705.78 TELEPHONE SERVICES 140829 GERHARDTS,INC. 9905.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140830 GIERUCH-MITCHEUL.INC. $5.571.86 PUMP PARTS 140831 N GLANTZ&SON $565.69 BUILDING MATERIALS 140832 GOLDEN COAST SAWDUST PROD. $1.616.26 SAWDUST 140833 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $265.07 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 140834 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING 5550.59 PRINTING 140835 DGA CONSULTANTS $16.133.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.64F94 140836 BROTH EQUIPMENT CORP. $78.23 FREIGHT 140837 HB TYPE B GRAPHICS $473.64 PRINTING 140838 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. 5134.78 TRUCK PARTS 140839 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $536.65 ELECTRIC PARTS 14OB40 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $396.41 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140841 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1.650.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 140842 HAUSER ENGINEERING $1.188.60 LAB SERVICES 140843 HAWKINSASSOCIATES $1.450.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 140844 PL HAWN CO,INC. $1.495.60 FILTERS 140N5 JOHN C.HENBERGER CO. $1,001.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140546 HILTI.INC. $290.45 ELECTRIC PARTS 140547 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $55.04 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140848 HOW CONTROLS DNMOKE.INC. 697A5 VALVES 140849 HOME DEPOT $1.012.04 HARDWARE 140850 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $398.0 PAINT SUPPLIES 140851 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN 5212.04 BICYCLE PARTS 140852 IDEKX $407.N LAB SUPPLIES 140853 IMAGING PLUS $331.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140854 IMPERIALWEST CHEMICAL $38,357AM FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11.18-92 141M55 IMPULSE ENTERPRISE $799.47 CABLE 1408M INDUSTRIAL AIR COMPRESSOR $345.35 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140857 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $282.95 CONNECTORS 140858 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $824.41 BATTERIES 14N59 JAMISON ENGINEERING $10,418.55 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140860 GREATWESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1.194.66 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140861 JAYS CATERING $297.88 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 140862 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $326.09 ELECTRIC PARTS 140863 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $1.920.65 PUMP 140864 KAMAN BEARINGS B SUPPLY $285.19 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 140865 KING BEARING,INC. $1,830.81 MACHINE SUPPLIES 140M KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.573.13 TOOLS 140B67 KURZ INSTRUMENTS,INC. $2.95237 METER 140 S LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $105.19 PUMP PARTS 140N9 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L.LAVOIE 5138.OD LEGAL SERVICES-NITZEN 140870 LEGI-TECH $320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 140871 LEYBOLD VACUUM PRODUCTS $191.55 LAB SUPPLIES 140872 UEBERT CORPORATION 6479.60 ELECTRIC PARTS 140873 UMITORQUE CORP. $3.198.58 VALVES FUND NO 9199 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATElWIV84 PAGEN REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/15154 POSTING DATE 1011901 WARRANTNO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140874 K.P.LINDSTROM.INC. $5.249.25 CONSULTING SERV.-ENVIRON.M.O.12-9-90 140875 LORAIN PRODUCTS $1,317.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140876 LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORP. $75.04 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140877 LUX SCIENTIFIC INST.CORP. $110.55 LAB SUPPLIES 140878 MULTILIN,INC. $2.614.90 ELECTRIC PARTS 14W79 MPS $95.53 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 140880 MANDIC MOTORS $28.00 TOWING SERVICES 140881 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION.INC. $9,271.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140882 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 5504.33 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140883 MCGRAW-HILL PUBLICATIONS CO. $128.06 PUBLICATION 140884 CHUCK MCRANEY $314.43 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 140885 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES $1.31I N ELECTRIC PARTS 1408M MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $173.T3 INSTRUMENTSUPPLIES 140887 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS 574,601.71 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT 140888 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $749.97 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.11-1B-92 140889 MICROBICS CORPORATION $98.15 CHEMICALS 140890 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $3.135.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 140891 MISCO $917.69 ENGINE PARTS 140892 MISSION INDUSTRIES 53.209.47 UNIFORM RENTALS 140593 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL,INC. $148.70 PUBLICATION 1408N MLADEN 13UNRCH CONSTRUCTION $1,041.690. 0 CONSTRUCTION 14-14A 140895 MONITOR LABS $1.750.87 INSTRUMENT PARTS 14D696 MONTGOMERY WATSON 518,000.00 OCRWRP FEASIBILITY STUDY 140097 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $201.96 MECHANICAL PARTS 140098 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC. $95.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 1408N NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES,INC. $5,786.38 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 140900 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 5370.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140901 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $152.08 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 140902 RORY NELSON $24,400.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 140903 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $193.54 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140904 NORTHWEST CARBON $3.455.13 CHEMICALS 140905 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $796,32 SAFETY GLASSES 140908 OFFICE PAVILIONSIINTERIOR RESOURCES $141.12 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140907 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE 52,542.28 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140908 ORANGE COURIER $89.10 COURIERSERVICES 140808 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $1.567.36 FITTINGS 1409f0 CO OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTROLLER $4,840.00 HEALTH SERVICE FEE 1405t1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $50D.00 DEFERRED COMP TAXES 140912 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $19,226.81 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 140913 COUNTY OF ORANGE $11,000.00 SEWER LINE PROTECTION M.O.S.8.94 140914 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 570,005.00 GAP WATER USE M.O.&9-93 M015 PGC SCIEKRFICS CORPORATION $50.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140816 PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH LABS $217.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140917 PACO SALES $205.80 PAINT SUPPLIES 14081E PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $1,337.34 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140919 PACIFIC PARTS $3,282.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10lIVN PAGE 05 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10118194 POSTING DATE 10119M WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140920 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT $350.05 PUMP PARTS 140921 PACIFIC BELL $19.73 TELEPHONE SERVICES 140922 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $230.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 140923 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $7.734.00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS M924 PARTS UNLIMITED 5371.61 TRUCK PARTS 14D925 KPMG PEAT MARWICK CPA $18.011.00 AUDITING SERVICES M.O.6-11-94 140926 PEDERSON COMMUNICATIONS $5,713.09 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140927 PERKIN-EWER CORPORATION 23,578.66 LAB SUPPLIES 140928 PIMA ORD SYSTEMS,INC. $140.360.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5.8-91 140929 POLY ENTERPRISES,INC. 6608.79 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140930 RHONE POULENE $4,325.89 CHEMICALS 140931 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 8272.00 ICE 140932 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1,715.43 TRASH REMOVAL 140933 THE REGISTER $663.00 NOTICES BADS 140U REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. SUOM0 OCEANMONITORING 14W35 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT.CORP. S405.7B LAS SUPPLIES 140935 ROSEMOUNTANALYTICAL 91,009.42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140937 ROTANIUM PRODUCTS CO. $289.48 ELECTRIC PARTS 140938 SOR.INC. $87.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140939 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $7.000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 14MO SANTA AM ELECTRIC MOTORS $732.70 ELECTRIC PARTS 14MI SARBS-PDC 91,200.W TRAINING REGISTRATION 140942 SANTA FE BAG CO. $32.05 FREIGHT 140943 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $67.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140944 SEA COAST DESIGNS $598.23 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140845 SHURELUCK SALES $3,381.93 TOOLSRIARDWARE 140949 SIGMACHEMICALCO. $215.45 PUBLICATION 140047 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $1.337.52 TOOLS 140948 SOUTH COAST WATER $103.25 LAB SUPPLIES 140949 SOUTHERN CALIF.EDISON CO. $2.336.91 POWER 1409M SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $32.741.30 POWER 140051 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $10,549.60 NATURAL GAS 140952 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $21,389.20 DIESEUUNLEADED FUEL 140953 SOUTH SHORE WINDOW MINT. $2,083.33 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 140954 SOUVENIR PHOTO $111.51 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 140955 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2.737.51 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 140956 STATEWIDEINSTALLERS 93.11W.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 140957 GARY 0.STREED $5.332.90 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL 140958 SULLIVAN,WORKMAN 8 DEE,TRUST 9101.00 REIMBURSE COURT FEES 140959 SUNSET FORD $856.12 TRUCK PARTS 140960 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1.338.85 ANITORIAL SUPPLIES 14MI SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. $83.39 TOOLS 140M TALENT TREE PERSONNEL SERVICES $2,740.04 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 140963 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $526.41 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 140964 TECHNOMIC PUBLISHING CO,INC. $155.00 BOOKS 140965 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $495.76 MECHANICAL PARTS FUND RO 9199 - IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1011VO4 PAGE N REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10119M POSTING DATE IWI9194 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140966 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP $238.00 PUBLICATION 140%7 TONYS LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $256.78 LOCKS 6 KEYS 140968 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $1.01.78 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.8-094 140969 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3.455.64 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPINO M.0.5-11-94 140970 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $718.56 TRUCK PARTS 140971 TRUESDAIL LASS $4.384.96 LAB SERVICES 140972 JG TUCKER B SON,INC. $6.269.46 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140973 CITY OF TUSTIN $7.907.76 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS 140974 TWINING LABORATORIES $18,971.82 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 140975 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $60.00 TRUCK PARTS 140976 ULTRASCIENTIFIC $810.00 LAB SUPPLIES 1409T7 UNDERGROUNDSERACEALERT $227.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140978 UNISOURCE WOR BUTLER PAPER $570.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140979 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $669.21 PARCEL SERVICES 140980 UNIVERSITY MICROFILM,INC. $11.66 PUBLICATION 140981 VWRSCIENTIFIC $790.25 LAB SUPPLIES 140982 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $4,693,58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140983 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $541.97 LAB SUPPLIES 1409U VERNE'S PLUMBING $23500 PLUMBING SERVICES 140985 VILLAGE NURSERIES $24A4 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 140566 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $12,214.29 CHEMICALS M.O.3-9-94 14987 GUY L WARDEN B SONS $1,144.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 14MS WEATHER BOND INSTRUMENT MI.% SAFETY SUPPLIES 140969 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $20,303.60 CAUSTIC SODA B HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.9-12-9284.1194 140990 WEST-UTE SUPPLY CO. $74.02 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140991 XEROX CORP. $11,96106 COPIER LEASES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1009194 $2,513.477.87 FUND NO 9186 - Ji DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/17/94 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FUND NO 0199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPER FUND 7.121.93 02 OPEN FUND 22.073.94 02 CAP FAC FUND 18.011.00 03 OPER FUND 48,095.24 83 CAP FAC FUND 27,427.40 85 OPER FUND 10,910.97 05 CAP FAC FUND 1.742.34 88 OPER FUND 11,748.03 05 CAP FAC FUND 13,111.19 97 OPER FUND 14,655.12 /11 OPER FUND 7.213.17 /11 CAP FAC FUND 165.675.09 013 OPER FUND 101.63 014 OPER FUND 507.83 014 CAP FAC FUND 1,059,067.26 8568 CAP FAC FUND 1,955.30 87814 OPER FUND 691.17 JT OPER FUND 737.548.19 CORF 157,598.43 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 60,646.18 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 147,479.26 $2,513,477.87 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA NOVEMBER 9, 1994 Agenda Item (9)(a): Consideration of motion to receive arid file staff report dated November 2, 1994, and approving extension of completion date for the Collaborative National Study Using Molecular Techniques to Detect Hepatitis A Virus and Virulence Factor Genes in E. Coli(Project No. HR-92-06) with National Water Research Institute (NWRI), University of North Carolina (UNC) and Hawaii Water Resources Research Center(HWRRC), from June 30, 1994 to February 28, 1995, with no change in the grant funding amount of $888,111.00. Summary: In November 1991,the Districts' Boards of Directors approved Districts' matching funds not to exceed $226,959 for a NWRI grant entitled "Development and Application of Molecular Techniques to Detect Indicator and Pathogenic Organisms in Treated Wastewater." In March 1992,the Districts' Boards of Directors authorized funds of $122,380for a second NWRI grant (Grant 2) designated "Collaborative National Study Using Molecular Techniques to Detect Hepatitis A Virus and Virulence Factor Genes in E. Colt" The Grant 2 collaborators consisted of UNC, HWRRC, and the Districts. Grant 2 was scheduled to begin July 1992 and end June 30, 1994. At the beginning of Year 2, the NWRI cut its funding by $21,793. In August 1993, the Districts' Boards of Directors voted not to reduce their matching funds. HWRRC was unable to obtain its matching funds for one year, which delayed HWRRC's work on the grant. Consequently, HWRRC has requested an extension to December 31, 1994. The final report is due within 45 days after the grant has ended. A staff report summarizing the history of the grants is attached. Staff Recommends: Receive and file staff report dated November 2, 1994,and approving extension of completion date for the "Collaborative National Study Using Molecular Techniques to Detect Hepatitis A Virus and Virulence Factor Genes in E. CoY (Project No. HR-92-06)with (NWRI), (UNC) and (HWRRC), from June 30, 1994 to February 28, 1995,with no change in the grant funding amount of $888,111.00. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 108aa ELLS AVENUE Po Box 9127 EOUNTNN VALLEY.CAL6OPN A 92726.6127 pL19622A 11 November 2, 1994 STAFF REPORT PROPOSED EXTENSION OF NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE GRANT IN SUMMARY The Districts received a grant from National Water Research Institute (NWRI) to perform a national collaborative study using molecular techniques to detect bacterial and viral pathogens in environmental waters. This work included_research on waters in California, Hawaii, and North Carolina. Hawaii did not receive all of its funds until one year after the beginning of the grant. This caused Hawaii to fall behind in the work and request a no-cost extension of the grant. Staff recommends that the NWRI grant, which was due to end June 30, 1994, be extended to February 28, 1995. BACKGROUND The National Water Research Institute (NWRI) includes the Irvine Ranch Water District, the Orange County Water District, the Municipal Water District of Orange County, the San Juan Basin Authority, and the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County; all operating under the terms of a Joint Powers Agreement. The mission of the NWRI is to provide research funding and to serve as an information center for the technical, ecological, economic and public policy issues of water quality, water resources and watershed management. Funding to accomplish this mission comes principally from Joan Irvine Smith with matching contributions from the research grant recipients. Administrative costs are financed by the member agencies. In November 1991, the Districts' Boards of Directors authorized the Laboratory staff to conduct a research project in cooperation with the NWRI. This project entitled "Development and Application of Molecular Techniques to Detect Indicator and Pathogenic Organisms in Treated Wastewater," was approved for a two-year period, from January 1992 through December 1993, in an amount not to exceed $450,460 with $226,959 to be reimbursed by the NWRI. This project is referred to as Grant 1 in this report. On March 11, 1992, the Districts' Boards of Directors amended the original action and increased both the scope of and the financial contribution to the project. Additional research via a second grant from NWRI was authorized. The new research project was entitled "Collaborative National Study Using Molecular Techniques to Detect Hepatitis A Virus and Staff Report for No st Extension to the NWRI Grant Page I Virulence Factor Genes in E. Coli," and was performed in cooperation with the University of North Carolina (UNC), and the University of Hawaii Water Resources Research Center (HWRRC). This project is referenced as Grant 2 in this report. The maximum funding approval was increased to $674,983 for the two-year project with $374,468 to be reimbursed by the NWRI. A total of $122,380 was contributed in matching funds by the Districts, the City and County of Honolulu pledged matching fund support to HWRRC for $127,915 and the UNC received matching support of$50,220 from Water Environmental Federation (WEF). The second grant was schedued to begin in July 1992 and end in June 1994. Due to NWRI internal budgetary concerns, funding from NWRI for the second year of Grant 2 was reduced by $21,793. In August 1993, the Districts' Boards of Directors voted to maintain matching fund support at the initial levels of committment and not to reduce even though NWRI funding was reduced. The budget expenditures for both Grant I and Grant 2 are presented in the following tables: Grant 1 Budget Summary Budget Item Project Funds Expenditures Remaining Budget Through June 1994 Funds Staffing $201,995 $190,123 $11,872 UCI - Dr. Stanley $62,282 $56,793 $5,489 Grant and graduate student Equipment $38,650 $45,269 $(6,619) Materials & $85,200 $108,826 $(23,626) Supplies Travel $24,474 $19,731 $4,743 Miscellaneous $37,859 $43,391 $(5,532) Total $450,460 $464,133 ($13,673) Staff Report for No-cost Extension to the NWRI Grant Page 2 Grant 2 Budget Summary Budget Items Project Funds Expenditures Remaining Funds Budget Through June 1994 Staffing $152,733 $90,023 $62,710 Constultants $211,230 UNC $104,827 $3 HWRRC $106,400 Equipment $ 7,000 $6,733 $267 Materials & $31,888 $25,546 $6,342 Supplies Travel $29,800 $17,246 $12,554 Miscellaneous $5,000 $165 $4,835 Total $437,651 $350,940 $86,711 The total amount for Year 1 for NWRI Grant 2 is $305,505. The Districts received $162,606.00 from NWRI for Year 1, of this, $58,000.00 was dedicated for the Districts' Laboratory, $60,359.00 was designated for Dr. Fujioka and $58,787.00 was designated for Dr. Sobsey. All NWRI funds were sent quarterly to the Districts and were then dispersed by the Districts, to the co-principal investigators (Dr. Roger Fujioka in Hawaii and Dr. Mark Sobsey in N. Carolina) as quarterly payments. The Districts provided $58,000.00 in matching funds to the Laboratory, the City and County of Honolulu provided $60,359.00 to Dr. Fujioka as matching funds, and Dr. Sobsey's matching funds consisted of a salary match of$14,540.00 and $10,000.00 from Water Environment Foundation. NWRI agreed to grant Dr. Sobsey $60,359.00 in exchange for his University and WEF's contribution totaling $24,540.00. The grant work was scheduled to begin July 1, 1992 and funding, provided by NWRI, was received on July 30, 1992. The Districts and UNC were able to begin grant research immediately. However, Dr. Fujioka of HWRRC received his first payment from NWRI in the form of equipment that was required to begin the project. The equipment utilized the entire $24,143.00 of his first payment from NWRI. Problems arose since the City and County of Honolulu did not provide the expected matching funds. Due to the lack of matching funds, Dr. Fujioka's was unable to hire technicians for the grant and could not purchase materials and supplies. This caused Dr. Fujioka to get behind schedule in his work. For this reason, Dr. Fujioka has requested a no-cost extension of Grant 2 from June Staff Report for No st Extension to the NWRI Grant Page 3 30, 1994 until December, 1994. He has requested this extra time in order to complete the field sampling and subsequent pathogen detection work outlined in Grant 2. Dr. Sobsey will utilize the extra six months to further evaluate the field samples that he has collected. Initially, these samples were only tested for hepatitis A virus (HAV). The samples will undergo additional testing to determine if enteroviruses are also present. He has agreed to perform this work at no additional cost to the grant. The grant requires a final report. This report is due 45 days after the grant has ended. Dr. Palmer, as Principal Investigator, is solely responsible for the completion of this report which will incorporate and combine grant research results from the Districts' laboratory with results from the Hawaii and North Carolina research teams. There is $86,711 left in the Districts' portion of the NWRI Grant 2. These are adequate funds to cover the time and salary required for completion of the final report and other needs related to completion of the grant. The NWRI has approved the no-cost grant extension request for all three laboratories. RECOMMENDATION Staff, therefore, recommends a no-cost extension of the NWRI grant. The grant will be extended from June 30, 1994 until February 28, 1994 to allow time for completion of the final report. Ref. #480076.RPT l �1 Staff Report for No<ost Extension to the NWRI Grant Page 4 JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS 4 REGULAR MEETING AGENDA NOVEMBER 9, 1994 Agenda Item (9)(b): Consideration of motion authorizing the settlement of Workers' Compensation claim for former employee, Peggy Rupp, in the amount of $22,000.00. Summary See attached memorandum dated October 19, 1994 from General Counsel. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of settlement of Workers' Compensation claim for former employee, Peggy Rupp, in the amount of$22,000.00. »w�vaeaaa�++we JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA NOVEMBER 9, 1994 Agenda Item (9)(c): consideration of motion authorizing the settlement of Workers' Compensation claim for employee John Soto in the amount of $20,000.00. Summary See attached memorandum dated October 19, 1994 from General Counsel. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of settlement of Workers' Compensation claim for employee John Soto in the amount of$20,000.00. wp« g ml lm w JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA NOVEMBER 9, 1994 Agenda Item (9)(d): (DISTRICT NO. 5 DIRECTORS ONLY) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Cross-Complaint entitled 21st Century Casualty Company vs. State of California, State of California vs. County Sanitation District No. 5 and Anaheim Sewer Construction, Orange County Municipal Court Case No. 94-C-2083, seeking recovery for alleged property damage, and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts and to seek recovery of its costs and fees related thereto. Summary See attached memorandum dated November 2, 1994 from General Counsel. V..� Recommendation Staff recommends approval of motion to receive and file Summons and Cross-Complaint and authorization of General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. xytloc\bs\eBe4\t i-09tl JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA NOVEMBER 9, 1994 Agenda Item (9)(e): (DISTRICT NO. 7 DIRECTORS ONLY) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-133-7, ordering annexation of 1.599 acres of territory to the District, in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of Ranchwood Trail and Amapola Avenue in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 139 -Garr Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Summary This 1.599-acre annexation has one inhabited single-family residence, located in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of Ranchwood Trail and Amapola Avenue in unincorporated County territory (within Orange Park Acres). The local sewering agency is the City of Orange. The annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB tax exchanges for annexing properties. District No. 7 previously adopted on October 13, 1993 Resolution No. 93-140-7 ordering this annexation. However, LAFCO had terminated the annexation due to a failure by the proponent to complete proceedings within the mandated time frame. LAFCO has now advised that a new resolution should be adopted by District No. 7 that follows their approval on August 5, 1994. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution ordering Annexation No. 139- Garr Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. w,aonesWs+�rr�se ` RESOLUTION NO. 94-133-7 ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 (ANNEXATION NO. 139 - GARR ANNEXATION) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (ANNEXATION NO. 139 - GARR ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7), AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 93-140-7 ••rrrrrurrrurrrrrrrrrrrrrrurrrr The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That a request has heretofore been made to County Sanitation District No. 7 for annexation of territory to the District by means of a petition filed by the property owner, Mr. Earl Garr; and, Section 2. That the designation assigned by the District to the territory proposed to \� be annexed is "Annexation No. 139 - Garr Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7% the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code, application has heretofore been made by District No. 7 to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of said territory to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of Resolution No. 91-155-7, filed with said Commission by said District; and, Section 4. That the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of Orange adopted its Resolution No. 94-10 on February 5, 1992, making determinations and approving proposed Annexation No. 139 - Garr Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, without notice or hearing and without election; and, Section 5. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 6. That the reason for annexing said territory is to obtain and provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, V Section 7. That payment of annexation acreage fees in the amount of $6,208.92 has been made and all terms and conditions specified by the Local Agency Formation Commission have been satisfied; and, Section 8. That the District has agreed, pursuant to Section 99(h)(1) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies; and, Section 9. That the regular County assessment roll is utilized by this District; and. Section 10. That the affected territory will be taxed for the existing bonded indebtedness of District No. 7; and, Section 11. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, Section 56837 of the California Government Code, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be, and is hereby, ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7 without notice or hearing and without election; and, Section 12. That the Secretary of District No. 7 transmit a certified copy of this resolution, with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5 of the Government Code, to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County. Section 13. That Resolution No. 93-140-7 is hereby rescinded. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 9, 1994. RAK1.J33 EXHIBIT "A" Garr Annexation No. 139 to County Sanitation District No. 7 Lot 9 of Tract No. 931 and a portion of the adjacent street in the City of Orange, County of Orange, State of California per a map recorded in Book 29, Page 26 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of said County, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the existing boundary line of County Sanitation District No. 7 as established by 'Annexation No. 27 (Mead) • and 'Annexation No. 75", said point being the Southeasterly co=er of said •Annexation No. 75", said point also being distant South 89"59'40" West, 675.49 feet from the Westerly terminus of that certain course described as 'North 89.59140" West, 3184.90 feet' in said •Annexation No. 27 (Mead) , said point also being at an intersection of the centerline of Ranch Wood Trail (50.00 feet wide) with the Westerly prolongation of the Southerly line of Lot 9 as shown on above mentioned map: THENCE following along said existing boundary line per said "Annexation No. 75" and said centerline North 00.00120' East, 234.53 feet; ,THENCE leaving said centerline East 200.42 feet following along the Westerly 'prolongation of and the Northerly line of said Lot 9 to a point on the Southwesterly line of Lot B (40.00 feet wide) , said point being on the Northeasterly line of said lot 9, said point also being on a ncn-tangent curve, concave Northeasterly and having a radius of 220.00 feet, a radial from Page 1 of 2' ffiIHIT A-1 Exhibit 'A'• ' Garr Annexation Ho. 139 to ..✓ County Sanitation District No. 7 . said point bears North 53.591578 East; THENCE Southeasterly following along said Northeasterly line, said Southwesterly line and said curve through a central angle of 40000'05' and an arc length of 153.59 feet to the Easterly line of said Lot 9; THENCE leaving said Northeasterly line, said Southwesterly line, and said curve South 150.41 feet following along said. Easterly line to the Southerly line of said Lot 9 and a point in said existing boundary line of said district per said •Annexation No. 27 (Mead) '; THENCE North 89.59'40' West, 325.21 following along said existing boundary line per said annexation to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above described parcel of land contains 1.599 acres. Attached and made a part of is a map designated as Exhibit 'B'. gE0 LAND Sliq .QUEY, f��Fio1+ � N0. 2988 C: QueyTel, 62988 ' 6/30/92 This proposal does meet the approval l4lE0 CAUfO��p of the Orange County Surveyor's Office. Da d this ' day o '1991. `GCS:1 NO3 CIA f 140.44M Jc anas, Count7f 5 or E77.MAW Page 2 of 2 ATE OFCAUF" E$9= A-2 EXHIBIT 'B' SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET 'BLOCK 5953 Gcc AnMaatlAn No. 139 MODULE 66 to County Sanitation DSatriDt No. 7 N SCALE : r SO, I�z.3m ml m � w � RANCH WOOD TRAIL�1 e Z; u T u K 00' 00' 20"E _ Elm v Z 8 $ 4� Ell w r ` 0 a= 7 u �ag lz ymniR / ZO 33. souTN 15o.Ir / �%` o rD� r mOQe 2Or 2V SbS I H sEP uRo w*Y LEGEND E=TwG BOI@S)ART AIBIEXAMW BOUNDARY ND.2m Tw ROPOSAL DOES MEET THE APPROVAL µYD a 5/39/92 TIE RANGE CWN SURVEYORS OFFICE OAT Tw Y ,199L '� I�FOF CAU10P 1410 W.9AIW1 J o1 AS,c �•rl .der C. e e 294 91: ENGINEERINGNC W e P�• T'� I GOV yes., 5. 19916-wop" � oa m ;'OR a , A---' `. SCALE: F.B.O McMIm.GIllamle 92aDS-0aaa OM11ER: GARR I" 60' _ EXHIBIT B _ _ JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA ��FNOVEMBER 9, 1994 Agenda Item 11 (a): Minutes of the Executive Committee: (1) Receive and file draft Operations Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 5, 1994 (2) Receive and file draft Engineering and Construction Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 6, 1994 (3) Receive and file draft Executive Subcommittee Minutes for the meeting held on October 14, 1994 (4) Receive and file draft Finance and Personnel Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 19, 1994 (5) Receive and file draft minutes of the Special Executive Search Committee meeting held on October 26, 1994 (6 ) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on October 26, 1994 Summary See attached draft minutes. Recommendation Receive and file draft minutes listed above. wpum�.cuma.�r. AGENDA ITEM NO, 11 II County Sanitation Districts _ of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 • 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OCTOBER 26, 1994 - 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, October 26, 1994, at the Districts' Administrative offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Robert Murray, David Griffith & Associates, Ltd. John C. Cox, Jr. Joint Chair Peer A. Swan Vice Joint Chair & Chair, District 14 STAFF PRESENT: Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chair Fred Barrera Chair, District 1 Blake P. Anderson, General Manager John Collins Chair, District 2 Gary Streed, Director of Finance Sal Sapien Chair, District 3 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel James A. Wahner Chair, District 6 Margaret H. Nellor, Director of Technical Barry Hammond Chair, District 7 Services Grace H. Winchell Chair, District 11 John D. Linder, Director of Engineering John M. Gullixson Chair, District 13 Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance Roger Stanton County Supervisor Bob Dolan, Assistant Director of Operations William Steiner County Supervisor Absent: A. B. Catlin Past Joint Chair William D. Mahoney Past Joint Chair Jan Debay Chair, District 5 APPROVAL OF MINUTES. The minutes of the September 28, 1994 Executive Committee were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Executive Committee October 26, 1994 Page 2 REPORT OF THE OPERATIONS COMMITTEE. Enclosed is a copy (buff) of the minutes of the October 5, 1994, Operations Committee. REPORT OF THE ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE. The Engineering & Construction Committee met on October 6, 1994, to consider several matters. Enclosed, is a copy (white) of the Committee's October 6, 1994, meeting minutes that report its recommendations: (a) Authorization to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver, Inc., re Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44, and Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-53, providing for additional design and construction support services. The negotiated agreement will be returned to the Directors at a future meeting for consideration. (b) Authorization to negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers re Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. 131-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Jc' No. P2-43, providing for additional construction support services. The negotiated agreement will be returned to the Directors at a future meeting for consideration. (c) Approval of Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design and construction services re Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No P1-41, and Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48, for additional design and software programming services. (d) Approval of Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P-36-1, Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-1, Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-4, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-3, authorizing an addition of$26,350 to the contract with Advanco Constructors for four items of added work. (a) Approval of Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P243-1, authorizing an addition of$25,000 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for central power generation switch gear modifications. 1 Minutes of the Executive Committee October 26, 1994 �./ Page 3 (f) Approval of Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, authorizing an addition of $22,039 to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc., for three items of additional work. (g) Approval of Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2), authorizing a net addition of$38, 854 to the contract with Javaid Contractor's Inc., for three items of additional work and granting a time extension of 19-calendar days for completion of said additional work. (h) On October 6, 1994, the Engineering & Construction Committee recommended that staff be directed to develop a Scope of Work for architectural and engineering services for design of the New Personnel Building, and that said scope provide discretion on design and cost-control measures to the selected architectural firms receiving the RFPs, approving a budget target of up to $183/square foot, and authorizing staff to solicit proposals from the 14 firms meeting the requirements of the Districts' Requests for SOQs. The Committee would like to negotiate an agreement with a firm and submit a recommendation at a future meeting. Executive Committee Recommendation. Following a general discussion, the Executive Committee recommends referring Item (h), Authorization to approve the New Personnel Building, Job No. J-26, back to the Engineering & Construction Committee for further review to re-examine the concept of a personnel building in the context of a space utilization study of the Districts' existing Administrative Building and a broader look at future office needs, including personnel, training rooms, meeting rooms and other office activities. REPORT OF THE FINANCE & PERSONNEL COMMITTEE. Enclosed is a copy (green) of the minutes of the October 19, 1994, Finance & Personnel Committee. REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE SUBCOMMITTEE. The enclosed (pink) minutes of the October 14, 1994, Executive Subcommittee were approved as drafted. REPORT OF THE SPECIAL EXECUTIVE SEARCH COMMITTEE. �..i Enclosed is a copy (gray) of the minutes of the October 26, 1994, Special Executive Search Committee. Minutes of the Executive Committee October 26, 1994 Page 4 DISCUSSION OF RESOLUTION NO. 87-51, FIXING AND ESTABLISHING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CONDUCT OF BUSINESS OF THE DISTRICTS WITH REGARD TO SECTION 5 REFERRING TO ROBERTS RULES OF ORDER (SEE ENCLOSED fYELLOWI RESOLUTION NO. 87-511: Receive and file memorandum dated October 20, 1994 from the General Manager regarding request of Director Gullixson for discussion of rules of procedure of the Boards and Committees (see enclosed memorandum). Executive Committee Recommendation. Following a discussion of Resolution No. 87-51, the Executive Committee directed staff to provide a copy of"Roberts Rules of Order," to all Committee Chairs. The Committee also directed staff to establish a method for Committee members to agendize items. ADJOURNMENT. The Executive Committee adjourned at approximately 6:30 p.m. �../ j:nr dE VmWxec\1DI694.ecm .^ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE SEPTEMBER 28, 1994-5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, September 28, 1994, at 5:30 p.m. at the Districts' Administrative Offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHER PRESENT: Present: Director Jan Debay Seth Oberg John C. Cox, Jr. Joint Chair Diane West Peer A. Swan Vice Joint Chair& Mary Markus Chair, District 14 Viola Sadler A. B. Catlin Past Joint Chair Dan R. Griffin Past Joint Chair Fred Barrera Chair, District 1 STAFF PRESENT: John Collins Chair, District 2 Sal Sapien Chair, District 3 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager James A. Wahner Chair, District 6 Blake P. Anderson, Director of Barry Hammond Chair, District 7 Engineering Grace H. Winchell Chair, District 11 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel John M. Gullixson Chair, District 13 Margaret H. Nellor, Director of Technical Roger Stanton County Supervisor Services William Steiner County Supervisor Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance Absent: Terri Josway, Safety& Health Manager Lisa Carlson, Laboratory Staff William D. Mahoney Past Joint Chair Phil Sansone Chair, District 5 APPROVAL OF MINUTES. The minutes of the August 25, 1994 Executive Committee were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Executive Committee September 28, 1994 Page 2 FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS. Fiscal Policy Committee Chairman Swan reported that the Fiscal Policy Committee met on September 21st and considered several items of business. Enclosed is a copy (green) of the Committee's draft meeting minutes. Following are the recommended action items: (a) Internal Control Review and Recommendations Last year during the review of the 1992-93 annual audit report, staff and the Fiscal Policy Committee recommended that KPMG Peat Marwick conduct a further review of internal control procedures as a matter of good business practice in view of problems that were being encountered at other agencies. At the February 1994 meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors, KPMG Peat Marwick was authorized to conduct the extended review of the Districts' internal accounting controls; however the work was delayed until after the lax season when it could be done more economically. At the July Fiscal Policy Committee Meeting, Peggy McBride, KPMG partner, reported on their findings that the Districts have a strong internal control system, that no material weaknesses were found, and that their recommendations were merely refinements. The Committee, representatives of KPMG and staff then reviewed the draft KPMG report which included background information, control strengths that were already in place for the areas reviewed, and suggestions for improvements. The Committee agreed that KPMG recommendations and staff responses were on target and should be implemented over the coming year. The Committee directed KPMG to complete their work and to return to the September meeting. Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendation. The Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed the KPMG Peat Marwick Internal Control Report and the Staff Report Re Response to KPMG's Internal Control Review Report, enclosed with the Committee's minutes, and recommends that they be received, filed and approved; and that staff be authorized and directed to analyze those recommendations requiring additional resources for future review by the new Finance and Personnel Committee. Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the Fiscal Policy Committee. Minutes of the Executive Committee September 28, 1994 Page 3 (b) Extension of Agreement with Public Financial Management for Interim Financial Advisory Services. At the May meeting, the Committee recommended that Public Financial Management, Inc., (PFM) be retained to assist in the preparation of financial program manuals in addition to their transitional financial advisory services. As these manuals were not yet completed by the July meeting, the Committee recommended a time extension through September 30, at no increase in the maximum authorized compensation of$50,000.00. Staff and PFM are continuing to work with the Chair of the Fiscal Policy Committee on these manuals and several drafts have been reviewed. Despite these efforts, it appears that the manuals will not be completed by the September 30, 1994 expiration of the authority to work with PFM. Therefore, staff and the Committee Chair recommended Change Order No. 3 to Purchase Order 65384 with Public Finance Management, Inc., extending their services through October 31, 1994, at no increase in the maximum authorized compensation of$50,000.00. Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendation. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 to Purchase Order 65384 with Public Finance Management, Inc., extending their services through October 31, 1994, at no increase in the maximum authorized compensation of$50,000.00. Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the Fiscal Policy Committee. (c) Consideration of Resolution 'Ratifying the Adjustment Of the Shares of Various Districts of the Cost of Certain Improvements to Joint Facilities," 1990-92 Series "C" COP. On August 10th, the Boards of Districts 1, 2, 3, 7 and 11 adopted Resolutions for Reallocation of Certain Improvements Financed by the 1990-92 Series "C" COP ("Original Resolutions"). The purpose of the Original Resolutions is to reallocate project costs among the participating Districts so that all Series "C" COP proceeds could be spent by September 1, 1994, in compliance with the two-year arbitrage rebate spending test. Minutes of the Executive Committee September 28, 1994 `.►� Page 4 Unfortunately, District 6 did not have a quorum at their August meeting and, thus, did not adopt their Original Resolution until their September 14th meeting. Bond Counsel has advised that because there were two different resolution adoption dates by the participating Districts, adoption of a Ratifying Resolution is necessary so that all participating Districts will ratify the separate actions of the several Boards to adopt the Original Resolutions. Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendation. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends approval of the Resolution (salmon) enclosed with the Committee's minutes, Ratifying the Adjustment of the Shares of Various Districts of the Cost of Certain Improvements to Joint Facilities, 1990-92 Series "C." Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the Fiscal Policy Committee. REPORT OF EXECUTIVE SUBCOMMITTEE. Joint Chairman Cox reported that the Executive Subcommittee met on September 28, 1994, immediately preceding the Executive Committee meeting, and reported on the Subcommittee's deliberations. (a) Phase 3 Work Plan for Additional Operational and Organizational Studies. At the August 10th Joint Board meeting, the Directors authorized the Executive Subcommittee to review the Phase 3 Work Plan for additional operational and organizational studies with Ernst & Young after the early Phase 2 work had commenced, and following that review to submit recommendations to the Executive Committee on the operational and organizational issues that should be considered for further study in Phase 3. Following its review of the Subcommittee recommendations, the Executive Committee is to submit its recommendations to the Joint Boards for consideration. Minutes of the Executive Committee September 28, 1994 �.� Page 5 The Subcommittee has previously recommended (and the Boards have approved) addenda to the professional services agreement with Ernst & Young to conduct a two-phase, independent review of the Districts' Capital Projects Management Function, to add Phase 3, Task 1, Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance Functions, for a total amount not to exceed $105,000, and Phase 3, Task 4, Evaluation of Human Resources, for a total amount not to exceed $60,000. The total compensation authorized for said professional services agreement is now an amount not to exceed $295,000. The Subcommittee continued its review of the issues identified by Ernst & Young as possible Phase 3 studies. The Subcommittee focused its discussion on Task 5, Evaluation of Finance Organization and Function, and Task 10, Evaluation of Technical Services. The Committee decided to continue its consideration of the Phase 3 Work Plan until its next meeting on Friday, October 14th, for further study and discussion with staff. At that meeting, the Subcommittee will also receive a report from Ernst &Young on the Phase 2 Capital Projects Management Function Improvements Implementation, and the Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance Functions. Executive Committee Action. The Executive Committee then discussed Ernst &Young's Phase 3 proposal pertaining to Evaluation of Board Processes and Organization, following which counsel was directed to report back on the issue of member agency Board representation and alternatives to the Executive Subcommittee at their October 14th meeting. (b) Discussion re Dissolution of Executive Subcommittee. Because of the recent restructuring of the Board Committees and completion of the initial management and organizational work by Ernst & Young, the Subcommittee discussed whether it should dissolve and refer future work pertaining to operational and organizational issues to the Executive Committee. It was the consensus of the Subcommittee that because of the investment of time and energy and the good working knowledge that Committee members have developed on operational and organizational issues, the Subcommittee should continue its work on these issues for the foreseeable future. Minutes of the Executive Committee .--- September 28, 1994 Page 6 PROPOSED STAFFING CHANGES During the 1994-95 budget process, staff recommended several personnel and organizational changes to address staffing needs, programmatic revisions and budgetary constraints. The recommended changes were approved by the Fiscal Policy Committee but were put on hold by the Executive Committee pending studies being conducted by Ernst & Young, with the provision that they could be resubmitted on a case-by-case basis as the urgency dictated. Last month, the Executive Committee approved the formation of the Plant Automation Group and it was authorized by the Joint Boards at their September meeting. Staff is now requesting consideration of the following recommendations that were included in the original 1994-95 personnel budget proposal: (a) Proposed Laboratory Air Quality Program Staffing Chances Margaret Nellor, Director of Technical Services, reviewed the enclosed Staff Report (lavender) Re Laboratory Air Quality Program Staffing, recommending the following staffing additions to bring in-house certain air quality testing now being conducted by outside contract laboratories, at an estimated annual savings between $36,500 and $60,000: Add Position Monthly Salary Range 1 Scientist $4,080 - $5,775 1 Sr. Lab Analyst $3,125 -$3,891 Executive Committee Recommendation. Following a discussion of the requested staffing changes for the Laboratory's Air Quality Program, the Executive Committee concurs with staffs recommendation. (b) Proposed Safety and Health Office Program Staffing Changes Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel, reviewed the enclosed Staff Report (buff) Re Safety and Emergency Response Program Staffing, recommending several personnel changes to centralize and focus management of our hazardous materials and emergency response efforts. The proposed changes, which would result in a budgetary savings of$57,360 per year, are r Minutes of the Executive Committee September 28, 1994 Page 7 Add Monthly <Delete> Position Salary Range Safety & Health Office N/A Safety & Emergency Response Manager (Title Change Only) $4,960 - $7.015 1 Safety & Emergency Response Specialist $3,880-$5,490 <1> Hazardous Materials Specialist $2,755 - $3,910 1 Intern $16.00/Hr. Max �...✓ Director of Operations & Maintenance Office <1> Emergency Preparedness Coordinator $4,455 -$6,360 <1> Intern $16.00/Hr. Executive Committee Recommendation. Following a discussion of the requested staffing changes for the Safety and Health Office Program, the Executive Committee concurs with the staffs recommendation. ADJOURNMENT. The Executive Committee adjourned at approximately 620 p.m. � I:�W�9mb„ecN9288a.ecm II County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714( 962-2411 MINUTES OF THE OPERATIONS COMMITTEE OCTOBER 5, 1994 - 5:30 PM A regular meeting of the Operations Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on October 5, 1994 at 5:30 PM at the Districts' Administrative Offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present as follows: OPERATIONS COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: Present J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Blake P. Anderson, Director of Engineering Victor Leipzig, Vice Chair Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance John C. Cox Margaret H. Nellor, Director of Technical Barry Dense Services James M. Ferryman Bob Oaten, Assistant Director of Operations Thomas E. Lutz Charles Egigian Nichols, Conservation, Ted R. Moreno Recycle & Reuse Manager Carrey J. Nelson Ed Torres, Air Quality Manager Phil Sansone Mark Esquer, Operations Sal A. Sapien Peer A. Swan Daniel T. Welch Absent Pat McGuigan, Chair Fred Barrera Norman Z. Eckenrode Tracy A. Worley Minutes of the Operations Committee October 5, 1994 Page 2 Report of the Committee Chair The Operations Committee Vice Chairman, Vic Leipzig, welcomed the Committee members at this initial meeting, and outlined the goals of the new Boards of Directors committees and the role of the new Operations Committee. He stressed his view of the importance of the Committee because it will be overseeing the Districts' operational activities. The Joint Chairman, John C. Cox, announced that at the October 5, 1994 Steering Committee meeting held earlier, the firm of David M. Griffen & Associates had been selected to perform the search for the new General Manager. He also outlined the procedures to be followed as part of the selection process. As a prelude to the staff presentation on the Districts' operations, Joint Chairman Cox asked the Committee to evaluate the overview in terms of information that would help provide the Directors with a full understanding of what staff does, what the agency does, and who the agency serves, focussing on the "big picture." He noted that this type of information will be particularly important for the new Directors when they come on board in January 1995. The Chairman also asked for the Committee to provide feedback to staff on what information was missing or important in the overview presentation. Staff Overview of Operations Utilizing the Summary Staff Organizational Chart, 2020 Vision Summary, and a rendering of the Districts' operations, the General Manager reviewed the Districts' organizational structure, including brief descriptions of the functions of each department and division within the agency. He then reviewed the 12 elements of the Districts' 1989 30-year Wastewater Management Plan and provided an overview of the Districts' wastewater management program. Using overhead slides, Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations, provided information on the various wastewater treatment unit processes; the Districts' National Permit Discharge Elimination System permit compliance record; odor control measures; chemical usage and savings; water conservation and resultant energy savings; central generation power capacity; biosolids production; and operations personnel productivity and staffing. Bob reported that computer automation, trickling filter rehabilitation, energy conservation, personnel, and research process improvements are some of the key issues his department is facing. Margie Nellor, Director of Technical Services, provided information on the Districts' biosolids recycling program, present and planned water reclamation projects, and the water conservation program. She also identified key issues related to these programs including acceptability and marketability for biosolids recycling; cost, public acceptance and health concerns for water reclamation; and feasibility, institutional matters and cost/benefits for water conservation. u I Minutes of the Operations Committee October 5, 1994 Page 3 The Committee asked a number of questions related to biosolids production and disposal, flow, and cost of treatment. Staff was requested to provide the following information for future evaluation by the Committee: • Trends in biosolids production contrasted to digester gas production • Projections of future biosolids production • Trends in the cost of biosolids disposal • Total energy use and savings, including supplemental energy purchases • Trends in flow • Existing versus potential treatment capacity • Treatment cost per-million-gallons-per-day of wastewater for each plant, for both plants combined and for each unit process. It was suggested that staff identify a total of 10 to 15 of the most important indicators of performance, and establish benchmarks for measuring improvements of these indicators. The Committee also asked staff to clarity often-used terms pertaining to wastewater management. Staff was asked to brief the Committee on the Compliance, Laboratory, Source Control, Air Quality and Maintenance divisions at a future meeting. '�•� Responsibilities/Activities of Operations Committee The Vice Chairman asked the Directors to review the Committee's mission/charter set forth in the September 30, 1994 agenda package attachment for discussion at the November Operations Committee meeting. The Committee members discussed the role of the Committee in providing oversight and policy where needed, and the need to understand how the agency operates to fulfill that role. It was also noted that the Committee should play a role in reviewing budget/staffing requests before the Personnel and Finance Committee reviews the budget; developing strategies to meet operational needs; and submitting recommendations to the Engineering and Construction Committee. It was also indicated that each committee should develop long (12-month) and short (3-month) term calendars. The Committee members should also make regular visits into the treatment plants to view the operations. Committee Action: The Committee directed staff to prepare for the November Operations Committee meeting, brief descriptions (approximately one paragraph each) of what each division does and the key issues faced. This information, along with the Committee's mission/charter and the performance measure reports, would become part of a notebook the Committee could bring to each meeting. The notebook would be smaller than the present Director's General Minutes of the Operations Committee 1 October 5, 1994 Page 4 Information Handbook, and could be organized so that the Directors could refer back to the Director's Handbook for more detailed information. In addition to a discussion of the mission/charter, the Committee asked that future agendas include discussions of existing and projected flows; the impact of stormwater events on flow, particularly the practice employed by local cities of "popping' manholes during storm events to clear city intersections and how this can be stopped; and the impacts of water conservation on future flows. The Committee also expressed interest in tying plant tours to agenda items. The Committee also discussed staff attendance, meeting structure and length, agenda items, and meeting minutes. Adiournment The Operations Committee adjourned at approximately 8:00 PM. MHN:ahh REF #410097.RP f . II County Sanitation Districts S I of Orange County,California + P.O.Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE Wednesday. October 6. 1994 at 5:30 p.m. A regular meeting of the Engineering and Construction Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, October 6, 1994 at 5:30 p.m. at the Administrative Offices of the Districts. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: Director John Collins, Chair J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Director Jim Wahner, Vice Chair Blake P. Anderson, Director of Director John Cox Engineering Director Don Griffin Robert Ooten, Director of Operations Director Richard Partin Gary Streed, Director of Finance Director Jim Potts John D. Linder, Construction Manager Director Sheldon Singer Jack Vincent, Planning and Design Director Peer Swan Manager Director Charles Sylvia Roger Carrillo, Project Architect Director George Zlaket Chris Cervellone, Project Manager ABSENT: Director Buck Catlin Director Barry Hammond Director Bill Mahoney Director Linda Moulton-Patterson Director Miguel Pulido Director Margie Rice Minutes of Engineering and Construction Committee ` October 6, 1994 7 Page 2 (5): STAFF REVIEW OF ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. The Committee discussed the Boards-approved restructuring of their committees effective October 1, 1994. Since this was the initial meeting of the new Engineering and Construction Committee, staff provided a brief review of the Districts' engineering and construction activities. Staff utilized overheads to provide the review and the Committee, after making suggestions on its content, asked staff to present the materials as a hard copy contained within a briefing notebook for the Committee. (6): DISCUSSION OF NEW BOARD COMMITTEE STRUCTURE. At its meeting on September 29, 1994, the Steering Committee reviewed with senior staff the new Board committee structure, the roles of the Steering Committee and the Standing Committees, and how the committees will interface with each other, the Joint Boards and staff. The Engineering and Construction Committee is one of three standing committees reporting to the Joint Boards through the Executive Committee (a fourth standing committee). The Committee members discussed these issues as they relate to the Engineering and Construction Committee. Items discussed were: a) a copy of the August 19, 1994 memorandum from the Joint and Vice Joint Chairs re Proposed Board Committee Restructuring that was approved by the Directors at the September 14, 1994 Joint Board meeting; and b) a proposed description of the major features of the Engineering and Construction Committee. The Committee requested staff to provide more detail on the flow of work through the various divisions and an organizational chart. The issue of planning was discussed as it relates to this committee. Further discussion and definition will occur. The Committee also requested that staff address how construction is staged according to operation, economic advantage and benefit to cost ratio of early/late starts. The relative advantages of design/build contracts were discussed briefly and should also be considered for future projects. Chairman Collins asked staff to prepare a report for the next meeting on options for streamlining the approvals process; and discussing preapproved levels for change orders and professional services agreement addenda, including cost approval levels at different management levels (staff, management, Committee and Boards). Staff indicated that they would provide alternatives at the November meeting of the Committee. Additional items to present to the Committee at the November meeting include: Revised change orders reporting form showing categories of the changes and the percent of each occurring for a project; and the framework of state law governing public works contracts and what the Districts are obligated to do. Minutes of Engineering and Construction Committee October 6, 1994 Page 3 A plant tour of the capital projects is being considered, however, the time will have to be set to take advantage of daylight and the plant at which the Committee meeting will take place. The meeting room at Plant No. 2 is currently under construction with completion expected in the first quarter of 1995. ACTION ITEMS: (7): CONSIDERATION OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HOLMES & NARVER. INC. RE SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-44, AND SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-53. In March 1993, the Directors approved a $1,997,510 Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver, Inc., to prepare plans and specifications and provide construction support services for Jobs Nos. P1-44 and P2-53. The project includes seismic retrofit design for treatment plant structures and tanks, including soil stabilization at both Plants Nos. 1 and 2, and preparation of an emergency response plan. In August 1993, the Directors also approved Addendum No. 1 to this Professional Services Agreement, which provides for a reallocation of funds among categories of work but no change in the total fee. The original Scope of Work included five separate design and construction packages phased over a 24-month period. Design packages addressing Class 1 structures at Plant No. 2 are complete. Class 1 structures are considered critical to maintain facility operations and/or are critical to safety. The Class 1 seismic retrofit of designs was completed at Plant No. 2 first because Plant No. 2 is located directly upon the Newport/Inglewood Fault. The next design package was for Class 1 structures at Plant No. 1. Finally, Class 2 structures and soil stabilization at both plants were to be designed. The original estimated ultimate design and construction costs for this work is between $50-60 million. The original Scope of Work also required the preparation of an Emergency Response Plan that would provide a framework for coordinated, effective emergency management and response to a wide range of potential emergencies. These emergencies include earthquakes, fire, flood and hazardous spills. As the Emergency Response Plan began to develop, it became clear that new information required to be included in the Plan has exceeded the requirements detailed in the Scope of Work. Staff, in association with Holmes & Narver, determined that this Plan should be removed from the Scope of Work. This is proposed to be deleted for a credit under Addendum No. 2. The Emergency Response Plan will be prepared under a separate contract by others under primary direction of the Districts' Safety and Health Officer. The original Scope of Work also required Holmes & Narver, Inc. to conduct a seismology/geologic investigation to evaluate the potential for surface faulting at Plant No. 2 during an earthquake associated with the Newport-Inglewood Fault, and to design corrective soil strengthening procedures accordingly. Some of this work is also Minutes of Engineering and Construction , Committee October 6, 1994 / Page 4 recommended to be removed from the scope of work. The seismology geologic investigation fieldwork related to this task has been completed and the associated report has been submitted. Recommendations by the geotechnical subconsultant, Law/Crandall Inc. ("Report of Fault Rupture Hazard Investigation, Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2, June 13, 1994"), state: "Faults identified as having high activity levels (active faults) have a greater risk of surface rupture during the life of the facility. There is no known seismic retrofitting method or other type of remedial measure that would provide a cost- effective means of mitigating surface rupture. Therefore, future Class 1 and Class 2 structures, or structures intended for human occupancy, should not be planned in areas where active faults have been identified. We recommend a 50- foot structural setback from active faults for all future development of the above- mentioned types of structures at the site. Also, if the risks related to potential service disruption or uncontrolled effluent releases are considered critical, relocation of these structures is the only feasible method of hazard mitigation." Under Job No. P2-53, Phase 1 studies performed by Dames and Moore (an engineering consultant), two demonstration projects were recently concluded to evaluate two different types of soil stabilization procedures that could potentially prevent liquefaction around existing critical structures. Both of these demonstration projects failed. Neither grout injection nor chemical soil stabilization produced adequate strengthening of the soil. Holmes and Narver then recommended a third demonstration project using a more aggressive compaction grouting method and prepared plans for a test at one primary clarifier. During review of this third demonstration project, staff considered the estimated cost of the full scale use of the method ($20 million), the disruption of plant operations, the likelihood and extent of earthquake damage even with the grouting in place and alternative means of mitigation. Staff concluded that the differential settlement of any structure is estimated to be no more than three inches and this can be somewhat mitigated by adding more flexibility to pipe connections in future pipe replacement projects and which, in any case, could be relatively easily corrected by compaction grouting after the event. In short, this proposed work is very expensive and there is no assurance that the Districts would receive any protection from damage caused by liquefaction and displacement occurring as a result of a large magnitude quake. Staff therefore concluded that the third soil stabilization demonstration project need not be pursued and directed Holmes and Narver not to proceed. To mitigate the possible damage that could occur during a major seismic event at Plant No. 2, the Law/Crandall report suggests that critical structures be relocated to an area outside the fault zone. For existing structures, this is impractical and very expensive because it would require the building of replacement facilities and the demolition of existing structures. But the decisions on new structures will include best placement to reduce earthquake damage. The geotechnical consultant's study shows areas of anticipated high movement that should be avoided. Minutes of Engineering and Construction Committee October 6, 1994 Page 5 While proactively protecting all structures from all eventualities now appears impractical and, in fact, impossible, the 1989 Master Plan recommends the storage of vital repair equipment on-site, and that the Districts be ready to respond to a major seismic event. By having repair materials on-site and available for immediate use, the Districts would be able to repair existing equipment, pipelines and other critical items in a more timely manner to restore the integrity of the facility. Essential items could include pipe repair kits, sections of pipe, couplings, flanges, pumps, hoses and other items deemed necessary to get the plants back on-line. The above described work would require a change in scope with Holmes & Narver, Inc., to: (1) provide engineering services to inspect the existing facilities in the theoretical fault zone to determine the most probable damage that would be expected in a major seismic event, and means of repair that would be required; (2) provide engineering services to prepare plans and specifications to construct an earthquake resistant storage facility to house the strategic materials; (3) provide specifications for the purchase of the strategic materials (these items would be purchased separately by Districts' staff in accordance with the Districts' procurement procedures); and (4) provide additional construction support and assistance. Committee Recommendation a. The Committee recommends that staff be authorized to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Holmes and Narver, Inc. for planning, design and construction services relative to the Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No 131-44, and Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53, providing for changes to the original Scope of Work to delete preparation of the Emergency Response Plan and delete design services related to soil stability under structures, and to add design services to provide strategic positioning of emergency repair supplies and equipment, and associated construction support services, for an estimated net add of$190,000. Following the negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Committee and the Boards for further consideration. (8): CONSIDERATION OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS RE MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-38, AND MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-43. On June 12, 1991, the Boards awarded a Professional Services Agreement to John Carollo Engineers in the amount of$1,914,815 to provide engineering services for the design of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43. Both projects included over 100 relatively small miscellaneous improvements to various facilities throughout the two treatment plants. Three addenda have previously been Minutes of Engineering and Construction Committee October 6, 1994 Page 6 authorized for this contract. Addendum No. 1 provided for a change in the wording for the errors and omissions insurance coverage with no change in the contract amount. Addendum No. 2 provided for a number of additional tasks deemed necessary that could most effectively be completed through this design contract. Addendum No. 2 added $76,750.00. Addendum No. 3 provided for additional design services to complete the seismic retrofit of nonstructural items at both treatment plants and to incorporate small scope changes to meet operational and aesthetic needs identified during the design phase. Addendum No. 3 added $527,600.00. The total amended contract amount is $2,519,165.00. In the Districts' original Request for Proposal, construction support services were requested providing for a minimum of 2500 hours. John Carollo Engineers submitted the minimum number of hours with their proposal for a total value of$211,936.80. The minimum hours requested in the proposal was set by Districts' staff. This budget is anticipated to be expended by late 1994, based on the billings for construction support received to date and the typical cost expended monthly. JCE provides construction support in direct response to requests by Districts' staff. These services typically include attendance at project meetings, review of contractor shop drawing submittals, response to requests for plan clarification, preparation of change-order technical materials and review of change-order costs. The level of services required for a project depends on the complexity of the project and the time for construction completion. The miscellaneous projects are complex because of the many independent items that are modified at each plant, involving a significant amount of equipment, piping, electrical and instrumentation work. These projects had higher quantities of mechanical, electrical and control systems than a project with large amounts of concrete and foundation work, such as clarifiers or digesters. These miscellaneous projects require a higher amount of construction support services due to the variety of equipment and conditions that each portion of the projects entails. For each construction contract, a proportionately larger number of shop drawings are submitted for the numerous various components of all the systems as compared to a larger project with similar components. For example, the large secondary expansion project (with a construction value of$14,496,000) provides five types of pumps, while three miscellaneous construction projects (with a construction value of$11,434,000) will provide fourteen types of pumps, each with a separate set of shop drawings and performance data submittal, needing careful engineering review. In addition, each pump system (as with all constructed systems) requires testing and start-up for which consultant services are required. The design work for these miscellaneous projects is divided into five separate construction contracts (three of which have already been bid). JCE has been providing construction support since April 1993 when the first Miscellaneous Projects, Job No. P243-1, was awarded. Construction is anticipated to extend through February 1995 for projects presently in construction. Two additional projects have yet to be awarded Minutes of Engineering and Construction Committee '. October 6, 1994 Page 7 for construction that are presently in design under this design contract. Each new construction contract will create additional demands for consultant time for attending construction meetings, reviewing shop drawings and responding to design questions. Additional construction services are also required due to the time extensions of the construction contracts. One contract is beyond the original contract period and the other two construction contracts are likely to extend beyond their contract period. The time extensions equate to more construction support required from the consultant. Staff has evaluated the need for additional construction support and start-up services and recommended that negotiations be authorized for Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, for an estimated additional amount of$72,000. Committee Recommendation The Committee recommends that staff be authorized to negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P-138, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43. Upon completion of negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Committee for further consideration. (9): CONSIDERATION OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION RE REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 3. 4 AND 5 AT PLANT NO.1, JOB NO. P1-41. AND REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS D THROUGH Q AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-48. In January 1994, the Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of$482,210 for preparation of plans and specifications for design and construction support services to rehabilitate all 17 of the Districts' circular primary clarifiers. Rehabilitation of existing facilities must be done periodically, and completed sequentially to ensure both the continued operation of existing facilities and ongoing compliance with all regulatory requirements of our wastewater management program. Similar previous work was accomplished on these basins prior to 1985. All of the circular clarifiers are covered by geodesic domes that collect foul air produced during primary treatment. The facilities have been very successful in .. containing these foul odors. However, since the domes were installed, corrosion of the dome supports, clarifier mechanisms and walkway structures has occurred due to the corrosive constituents entrained in the foul air. (The repair of the dome column Minutes of Engineering and Construction Committee October 6, 1994 ' Page 8 supports is now underway in accordance with a negotiated settlement with the original installation contractor, Advanco Constructors.) This project (P1-41and P2-48) is to address the other corrosion-related problems as well as operational problems noted by the Districts' Operations and Maintenance staff over the past several years. In addition, upgrades to meet current hazardous location and electrical code requirements will be included and certain structural modifications will be made for seismic purposes. As the design for the rehabilitation of clarifiers progressed, several additional modifications and changes beyond the original Scope of Work were identified that staff believes will either automate the treatment process, provide operational flexibility, increase reliability or improve the safety to Operations and Maintenance staff. The recommended modifications to the original Scope of Work include: a) Replace existing pump control panels with new programmable logic controller(PLC) cabinets that will connect directly to the existing supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system data highway through a new fiber optic connection; b) Provide automated scum removal systems for scum troughs which will be controlled from the local PLC and monitored by the SCADA system; c) Develop and document the programming required for operation of the clarifier equipment during the design to ensure that the system is configured to be consistent with the standard control strategy that is now being developed by CH2M Hill; and d) Equip each clarifier with a gas detection system that will measure the amount of hydrogen sulfide, oxygen and methane that may accumulate under the domes. To enhance the level of safety for Districts' staff, these detected gases will be displayed and alarmed at each clarifier entrance, and at the central computer station in the Operations Center that is staffed twenty-four hours a day. Partially offsetting this proposed increase in the Scope of Work is a proposed decrease relating to the design of foul air fans and scrubbers. The original Scope of Work included the possible addition of six new foul air scrubbers. We originally anticipated that it would be necessary to significantly increase the air withdrawal rates from under the domes to meet existing codes. After detailed review of all codes, requirements and alternatives, it has been found that if the clarifiers are rehabilitated using corrosion-resistant material, explosion-proof electrical equipment and adequate confined-space gas-monitoring equipment, then the quantity of contaminated air that must be removed and scrubbed need not be increased over the existing rates. By not increasing the air removal rate we will avoid $600,000/year in added power costs. The portion of the original engineering fee for the air handling design can now be utilized to offset a portion of the additional work discussed above. Minutes of Engineering and Construction Committee October 6, 1994 Page 9 Staff has evaluated the need for additional design and programming services and recommends that Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for planning, design and construction services relative to Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41, and Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48, provide for additional services to replace existing pump control panels with new PI-Cs; provide an automated scum removal system for scum troughs; develop and document programming for operation of clarifier equipment for consistency; equip clarifiers with gas detection system to measure gases under the domes; and delete the design of foul air fans and scrubbers, be recommended for approval to the Boards of Directors. Following is a cost summary for Addendum No. 1: Item Add or(Deduct) 1. Replace Existing Pump Control Panels at Clarifiers $129,000 2. Provide standard clarifier control programming 19,000 3. Provide automated scum removal system for scum troughs 16,000 4. Delete Foul Air System modifications (96,802) Total proposed additional fee $ 67,198 The summary of the contract with the proposed change follows: Proposed Existing Proposed Revised Agreement Addendum Agreement Engineering Services (direct labor at hourly rates, plus overhead at 187%) not to exceed $440,053 $67.198 $507,251 Fixed Profit 42,157 0 42,147 Total Contract Amount 4 2 210 $6 408 Committee Recommendation The Committee recommends that Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, be approved, providing for additional ..J engineering services, increasing the total authorized compensation $67,198, from $482,210 to an amount not to exceed $459,408. A certification letter is attached. Minutes of Engineering and Construction Committee October 6, 1994 Page 10 (10): CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO THE CONTRACT WITH ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS FOR ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-36-1. SECURITY AND LANDSCAPING ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-38-1. MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-38-4. AND MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-03-3. It was moved, seconded and duly carried that Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-1, Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-1, Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-4, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job P2-43-3, authorizing an addition of$26,350.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, with no time extension for completion of the extra work, be recommended for approval by the Boards of Directors. (11): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO PRIORITY PROJECTS ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-43-1. It was moved, seconded and duly carried that Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P243-1, authorizing an addition of$25,000.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, with no time extension for completion of the extra work, be recommended for approval by the Boards of Directors. (12): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P242-2. It was moved, seconded and duly carried that Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, authorizing an addition of$22,039.00 to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc., with no time extension for completion of the extra work, be recommended for approval by the Boards of Directors. (13): ACTIONS RE OPERATIONS CENTER EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-23-5-1(REBID NO. 21. Staff outlined the continuing problems with the slow progress being made by the contractor, and concerns because of the record number of stop notices (form of mechanics lien). There still continues to be concerns about the final completion of the Minutes of Engineering and Construction Committee October 6, 1994 Page 11 project and staff put the contractor on notice that the contract would be terminated due to delays, nonpayment of subcontractors, etc. Liquidated damages have been accumulating that now total about 4% of contract price. This percentage could be 6% if project is not completed until the end of the year as staff now estimates. Staff met with the contractor and the contractor has taken steps to resolve the stop notice problems. An updated completion schedule has been submitted and justifications must accompany any deviations from the schedule, which indicates a completion date of November 25, 1994. Staff will be expedite, as much as possible, approval of change orders and progress payments for work completed to assist the contractor in meeting his obligations. The Committee will receive an update on this project at the next meeting. (b) Consideration of Change Order No. 4 to the Construction Contract with Javaid Contractors. Inc. It was moved, seconded and duly carried that Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1(Rebid No. 2), authorizing an addition of $38,854.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc., and granting a 19-calendar-day extension for completion of the additional work, be .. recommended for approval by the Boards of Directors. (14): ACTIONS RENEW PERSONNEL BUILDING AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-26. In the late 1970s and 1980s, the Personnel Department was housed within a small office building in the interior of Reclamation Plant No. 1. In the late 1980s, construction of treatment facilities at Plant No. 1 was accelerated and access to the Personnel offices within the Plant's interior became limited. Therefore, early in 1988, the office was moved to its present location. At that time a suuport facilities complex was constructed, utilizing used office trailers. The present Personnel offices occupy 3,600 square feet of floor space and are in need of repair if they are to be used much longer. In addition, our human resources and safety and health activities, to meet the needs of the Districts' employees and the general public, have outgrown the existing facility. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which became law in July 1993, leaves our existing personnel offices in non-compliance. In 1989, a new personnel building was included in the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan at its proposed site, just east of the Administration Building parking lot. The design of the personnel builidng was originally included in the support facilities design contract awarded to Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers in May 1989. After several attempts by the consultant to deliver a schematic design that satisfied the needs of our Personnel staff, and upon recommendation by the `... Building Committee, the personnel building was deleted from the support facilities contract with the consultant in August 1993. At the direction of the Building Committee, staff has prepared new renderings, floor plans, office layouts, and other features for the Minutes of Engineering and Construction Committee October 6, 1994 Page 12 new personnel building, in essence completing the schematic design phase. It is now time to retain a consultant to prepare the final construction documents and constrcution support, subject to Committee approval, following the general guidelines set by the Building Committee. Staff estimates that the fees for architectural and engineering design and construction support services to be $150,000 for this estimated $1.3 million project. In August 1994, Phase 1 of a comprehensive study by Ernst & Young made recommendations to the Board regarding the process of soliciting professional services from architects and engineers. The Personnel Building is the first project under the new procedures and review will be by the newly formed Engineering and Construction Committee. In anticipation of seeking authorization to send Requests for Proposals to qualified architectural firms, staff advertised for requests for Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) in the Orange County Register and the Orange County Chapter of the American Institute of Architects. On Speptember 15, 1994, in response to requests for SOQs, staff received responses from eighteen firms. Of the eighteen firms, fourteen firms satisfied or exceeded the requirements of the SOO. Below is a breakdown of the eighteen firms. Firms meeting the minimum requirements of the Districts' Request for SOQs: 1. Olfati Design Group 2. Kai Architects Long Beach Irvine 3. Dougherty & Dougherty 4. The Hill Partnership Newport Beach Newport Beach 5. Klages Carter Vail & Partners 6. CVC Architects & Planners Costa Mesa Costa Mesa 7. Bissell Architects 8. LPA Newport Beach Irvine 9. Gillis Iler& Clark Architects 10. The Blurock Partnership Irvine Newport Beach 11. Ralph Allen & Partners 12. James Karl Robinson Santa Ana Costa Mesa 13. Cash &Associates 14. Anthony Langford Architects Huntington Beach Huntington Beach Minutes of Engineering and Construction Committee October 6, 1994 Page 13 Firms not meefina the minimum requirements of the Districts' Requests for SOQs: 15. Studio 1 Architects 16. NBS Lowry Laguna Beach San Bernardino 17. Peflett & Kent Architects 18. LFA Huntington Beach Irvine Staff recommended that the Committee authorize sending Request for Proposals (RFPs) to the fourteen firms that met all requirements of the Request for SOQs. Additionally, staff recommended that the Scope of Work and the Schematic Design package previously developed be used as the basis for submissions by these qualified firms. Staff will recommend a short list of firms to be interviewed by the Engineering and Construction Committee at a future meeting. Committee Discussion The Committee discussed the concept of the Personnel Building as presented in the staff proposal and accompanying drawings. The external architectural features, including the roof line, glazing, overall shape and orientation of the building, received considerable discussion. Internal features, such as office and hall design, partitions versus floor-to-ceiling office walls, internal doors and overall concept were also discussed. The staff proposal envisioned a stand-along building across the parking lot from the existing Administration Building to provide ready community access. The Committee members discussed the merits of this concept versus integrating the Personnel Building as a new wing to the existing Administration Building. Overall budget for the building was also discussed. Staff presented a cost comparison chart (see goldenrod sheet) of miscellaneous support buildings constructed in the last four years here at the Districts as well as at IRWD and the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. Staffs budgeting unit price of$183/square foot (which includes the building shell, furniture, site preparation, landscaping, design firm costs and staff costs) also received considerable discussion. There was a wide range of views and costs on what should constitute the "right" budget number for total building cost (including everything listed above). The Committee reached a consensus that the project should move forward with Requests for Proposals (RFPs) that give the architectural firm a wide range of professional discretion in dealing with the Personnel Building; and that the initial budget should be established at $183/square fool. Minutes of Engineering and Construction Committee October 6, 1994 Page 14 Committee Recommendation The Committee recommends that the New Personnel Building, Job No. J-26, be approved in concept, and that staff be directed to develop a Scope of Work for architectural and engineering services for design of the New Personnel Building, and that said scope provide discretion pertaining to design and cost-control measures to the selected architectural firms receiving the RFPs, approving a budget target of up to $183/square foot, and authorizing staff to solicit proposals from the fourteen firms meeting the requirements of the Districts' Requests for SOOs. (The Committee will negotiate an agreement with a firm and submit a recommendation at a future meeting.) Directors Swan and Potts requested that their votes in opposition to the recommended action be made a matter of record. ADJOURNMENT At approximately 8:25 p.m., the Committee adjourned. ` SAH�IAipAp COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92729-8127 106"ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7e18 (714)962-241/ October 6,1994 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 108" Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation in Connection with Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3,4 and 5 at Plant No. 1,Job No.P141,and Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through O at Plant No.2,Job No.P248 In accordance with the Districts'procedures for selection of professional engineering services,the Engineering and Construction Committee has negotiated the following fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Addendum No. 1 for additional design services and deletion of modifications to the foul air system in connection with Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3,4, and 5 at Plant No.1,Job No. P141,and Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through 0 at Plant No.2,Job No.P248,on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead and direct expenses, plus Pored profit,in an amount not to exceed $67,198 Existing Proposed Revised Agreement Addn.No. 1 Agreement Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 187% and direct expenses, not to exceed $440,053 $67,198 $507,251 Fixed Profit 42,157 0 42,157 TOTAL CONTRACT,not to exceed S482.210 $67,198 $549.40 The Engineering and Construction Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/John Collins /s/James Wahner John Collins,Chair James Wahner,Vice Chair Engineering and Construction Committee Engineering and Construction Committee /sBlake P.Anderson Blake P.Anderson Director of Engineering COST COMPARISONS Ok ;HT SUPPORT FACILITIES CONSTRUCTED OR PLANNED FROM 1991-1994 PROJECT JOB NO. TOTALAREA ESTIMATED ESTIMATED DESIGN ESTIMATED TOTAL COST 2020 MSTR: TOTAL BLDG.COST CONST.COST COST STAFF,DESIGN, PLAN PROJECT (E/S.F.) const.,FFE, A&E Services. CONSTRUCTION ORGIN COST PER. Shell only Shell,skeamrk, CRISP EST. SF. Irrgation/ Staff cost only. landscape (CSDOC) PERSONNEL J-26 7,150.00 S0FT E693,500.00 $1.036,750.00 E70,D00.00 $200,000.00 E1,306,750.00 $ 988.000. E183ISO.FT BUILDING $97.00/SOFT. E145/SO.FT SAND CAN. 52,341 SO.FT. 58,804,330.00 $11.129.361.00 $738,300.00 $595,940.00 E12,466,601.00 'E238150.FT. YON HORTRS. E130.001SO.FT E213.001SO.FT IRWD OPERATIONS P2-23.5-1 NEW 10,244 S.F. $2.316,347.00 $2.400,000.00 $79,152.00 $750.000.00 $3,229.152.00 $3.125.000. $131/SO.FT CENTER (REBID (Remodel 9,825 $94.001SO.FT BLDG.EX- N0.2) S.F.) PANSION (plus on slor. E98/SO.FT (bid three times) (under con- 4,536 S.F.) struction) Tolal=24,605 SY WAREHOUSE P2-35-2 29.865 S.F. $2,313,850.00 $2,600.DDO.00 $4592200 $400,ODO.00 $3,045,922.00 $4,950,000. E68150.FT. BLDG.PLANT. (plus general and E52.0D/SO.FT NO.2 oil storage area E 58/50.FT 15,160 S.F.) MAINTE- P2-35.3 30,614 S.F. $2,738,042.00 $3,024,192.00 E48,651.00 E400,OOD.00 E3,472,843.OD $5.488,000. $1131SO.FT NANCEBLDG. E89JXVSOFT E98/S0.FT ADMINI. J-74 20,286 S.F. $4,908.114.00 $244.259.00 E1,008,923.DD $7,182,076.00 $176JSO.FT. BUILDING (EXISTING) (Corral.coal) 20,515S.F(NEW) $1.020.780.00 (furniture) TTL=40,801 S.F. CONTROL J-23.1 24,716.S.F. $3,828,428.00 $173,711.00 $790,035.00 $4.792,174.00 E1651SO.FT CENTER 3,500 SF(CART It132JSQ.FT PLANT N0A STOR) 680 SF(TUNNEL) TTL-28,896 S.F. CENTRAL J-17 36,000.S.F E8,153,OD2.0D $692,503.00 $1,093,398.00 $9,938,903.00 E276JS0.FT. LABORATORY S 226/SO.FT LA 58,D00JSF E6,960,000.00 $7,200,000 8556,000.00 Ea0,000.00 $7,836,000.00 E135JSG,FT. SANT. E 226/SO.FT E124.ODS.F October 8,1n34certlllolpenml3 *AII cost shown in this column do not Include the purchase price or present value of the land associated with the building as confirmed by the agency in question. k AN OVERVIEW OF OUR WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Presented by BLAKE P. ANDERSON Director of Engineering October 6, 1994 c THE PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION CYCLE OUTSIDE IN-HOUSE CUSTOMERS CUSTOMERS U.S. EPA Directors Water Quality Operations Control Board 2. DESIGN Maintenance SCAQMD Technical Cities 1. PLANNING Services Finance Public 3. CONSTRUCTION 5. OPERATION 4. START—UP & COMPLETION Y 1 . PLANNING Information from these • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency customers • Southern California Assoc. of Gov'ts. South Coast AQMD • State Water Quality Control Board • County of Orange • 23 Cities and 5 Special Districts • Utility Agencies • The Public • Ourselves (Directors and staff) Is used to make these • Population and flow projections estimates • Air emission projections and requirements • Wastewater characteristics and requirements • Power needs and opportunities • Biosolids projections and opportunities • Environmental and public health needs To plan for these facilities • Wastewater collection facilities and practices • Wastewater treatment facilities • Ocean disposal facilities • Biosolids reuse practices and facilities • Source control and prevention • Water conservation practices • Water reclamation practices and facilities • Project schedules • Budgetneeds D 2. PROJECT DESIGN Use engineering, technical, • Meet codes (electrical, seismic, scientific and financial resources of plumbing, building and fire) the Districts' Directors, staff and consultants to • Obtain permits (city, county, state) • Prepare designs • Coordinate with cities • Coordinate with other projects • Provide lowest life cycle costs • Provide reliability • Provide 100% compliance ... By • Develop Scope of Work • Issue Professional Services Agreements and Addenda • Manage plans and specifications preparation • Prepare cost estimates and schedules 3. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Use engineering and construction • Review and award contract to skills coordinating with operations lowest responsible bidder and maintenance (or cities, county, CALTRANS, etc.) to • Approve equipment and material submittals • Coordinate with cities • Coordinate with other projects • Maintain continuous operation • Ensure compliance with plans and specifications • Prepare monthly project payments • Prepare contract changes (change orders) • Provide survey control and materials testing • Comply with state and federal laws (labor, safety, public works) D 4. START-UP AND COMPLETION Engineering, consultant, operations • Check out, test all systems and maintenance, and contractor work together to: • Walk-through with all customers • Provide operations and maintenance training • Provide manuals and procedures • Manage start-up services • Complete Closeout Agreement. _y 5. OPERATION Operations and maintenance staff • Provide 24-hour operation (primarily) with support from engineering, finance and technical • Monitor incoming wastewater services staff • Run, adjust, tune systems • Measure performance • Provide preventative maintenance • Provide emergency maintenance • Watch trends • Monitor effluent quality Monitor ocean conditions • Report to regulators • Go back to No. 1. P ACTIVE PROJECTS (Completion this decade, mostly) PLANNING 27 Projects $130 million (and counting) Regional water reclamation project Second ocean outfall Miscellaneous improvements Districts' sewers. DESIGN 53 Projects $200 million Primary treatment expansion at Plant No. 1 .. Secondary treatment expansion at Plant No. 1 Seismic improvements Miscellaneous improvements Districts' sewers. CONSTRUCTION 28 Projects $115 million Secondary treatment expansion at Plant No. 2 Seismic improvements Miscellaneous improvements Districts' sewers. CHANGE ORDER COMPARISONS OCSD: 5.24% on $200 Million of recently-completed Treatment Work Projects 10 1 California Department of Corrections (10%for custom) 2 California Water Resources Control Board(5%allowed for relate d work) e -- --- -- -- -- 3 EPA(5%allowed for related work) _ . . 4 Corps of Engineers, Portland District (10%) [I 4 _ -- 5 CALTRANS(7M) {: 6 LA City, Dept.of Sanitation(9%) x , 1 7 LA County, Dept.of Harbors(10%) 8 LASCD"In-House"(4.66%) az: I _ 9 CSDOC(5.24%for all work) fff 1 2 x 4 e 6 6 9 Mrcv B OUR BIGGEST PROJECT ISSUES AHEAD NEW OCEAN OUTFALL STAGING FUTURE PRIMARY CAPACITY STAGING FUTURE SECONDARY CAPACITY REGIONAL WATER RECLAMATION PROJECT LONG-TERM BIOSOLIDS REUSE AUTOMATION/COMPUTERIZATION WILL BE ADDRESSED BY CONDUCTING NEEDS ASSESSMENTS PROJECTING FINANCIAL IMPACTS ASSESSING STAFFING IMPACTS ESTABLISHING PRIORITIES G FUTURE UNCERTAINTIES / TOUGH ISSUES • Wastewater Flow: Population Economy Changing practices. • Level of Treatment: 50% Secondary or 100% Secondary. • Air Quality Requirements: Federal Clean Air Act California Clean Air Act South Coast Air Quality Management District. • Water Reclamation Cost / Price Market Regulations. • Biosolids Reuse Cost / Price Market Regulations NIMBY. e .. FLOW INCOMING '. Gi.. . FLOW 1 TREATMENT CAPACITY YEAR • INCOMING FLOW INCREASES (USUALLY) YEAR—BY—YEAR AS POPULATION INCREASES • THE RATE OF CHANGE CAN BE REASONABLY ESTIMATED • WE BUILD OUR FACILITIES IN STEP—WISE INCREMENTS TO STAY AHEAD OF DEMAND • ECONOMY OF SCALE AND CONSTRUCTABILITY ARE U CONSIDERED TO DETERMINE THE SIZE OF A PROJECT AVERAGE WASTEWATER FLOWS VS TREATMENT CAPACITY 1994 Average Flow 230 Million gallons per day (mgd) 2000 Average Flow 250 mgd 2020 Average Flow 360 mgd Primary Treatment Capacity (all flow receives primary treatment) Plant 1 Operating Capacity 90 mgd (+18 mgd standby) Plant 2 Operating Capacity 156 mgd (+30 mgd standby) Total Operating Capacity 246 mgd (+48 mgd standby) Plant 1 Operating Capacity in 1998 120 mgd (+24 mgd standby) Plant 2 Operating Capacity in 1998 156 mgd (+30 mgd standby) Total Operating Capacity by 2000 276 mgd (+54 mgd standby) Secondary treatment Capacity` (half of all flow receives secondary treatment) Plant 1 Operating Capacity 66 mgd Plant 2 Operating Capacity 75 mgd Total Operating Capacity 131 mgd Plant 1 Capacity in 1997 100 mgd Plant 2 Capacity in 1998 90 mgd Total Capacity by 2000 190 mgd 'Two wild cards: Reclamation and future permit conditions. AUTOMATION AND COMPUTERIZATION SHORT-TERM SOLUTIONS (next 6 months) Philosophy: Don't prejudice long-range solution. Coherent with long-range solution. Features: Initial Financial Information System decisions. Laboratory Information Management System fixes (LIMS). Capacity monitoring and planning. LONG-RANGE SOLUTIONS Philosophy: Integrate systems as appropriate. Open architecture versus proprietary systems. Accommodate hardware upgrades. Futurism. Features: Continue plant automation efforts. New Strategic Information Systems Plan: Office automation Financial Information System Electronic Transactions/Business Practices. PEAK WASTEWATER FLOWS vs HYDRAULIC CAPACITY 1994 Peak Flow 495 Million gallons per day (mgd) 2000 Peak Flow 537 mgd 2020 Peak Flow 740 mgd Influent Capacity Plant 1 310 mgd (+110 mgd standby) Plant 2 408 mgd (+136 mgd standby) Total 718 mgd (+246 mgd standby) Effluent Capacity Outfall Pump Station 480 mgd (+120 mgd standby) Outfall Pipe 480 mgd Standby Pipe (+150 mgd standby) Future Capacity New Outfall Pipe Under study �.d i OUR OVERALL STRATEGY • 100% Compliance • Reliable Systems • Cost-Effective Solutions • Cross Media Considerations (air, land, water, energy) • Remain flexible about the future • Maximize site utilization • Masters of our own fate • Keep the genie in the bottle (prevention and conservation) County Sanitation Districts 6 of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue r Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF FINANCE AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEETING DATE October 19, 1994, 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Finance and Personnel Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on October 19, 1994, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: Committee Directors Present: Staff Present: Peer A. Swan, Chairman Blake Anderson, General Manager Roger R. Stanton, Vice Chairman Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance George Brown Gary E. Hasenstab, Director of Personnel John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chairman Steve Kozak, Financial Manager Jan Debay Michael D. White, Controller James H. Flora Steve Hovey, Information Services Manager John M. Gullixson Evelyn Hart Others Present: Wally Linn Iry Pickier Jessica Blume, Deloitte&Touche Thomas Saltarelli Jerome Thode, Deloitte &Touche Grace H. Winchell Peggy McBride, KPMG Kristen McCarthy, KPMG Committee Directors Absent: Burnie Dunlap Glenn Parker William G. Steiner APPROVAL OF MINUTES. The minutes of the Fiscal Policy Committee meeting of September 21, 1994, were approved as submitted. ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT AND MANAGEMENT LETTER FOR YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1994. Staff submitted the audit report in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) format for the first time. This report will be submitted to the Government Finance Officers Association for consideration for their CAFR award upon approval by the Directors. Minutes of Finance & Personnel Committee Page 2 October 19, 1994 9 Peggy McBride, the audit partner from KPMG, reviewed the conduct and results of the annual financial audit. She reported that once again the financial report included a "clear opinion letter' and that no material defects in procedures or control were noted. Staff, Ms. McBride and Kristen McCarthy, the audit manager for KPMG, reviewed the management letter and staff s response with the Committee. Staff concurred with the auditors comments and is in the process of implementing the changes necessary to eliminate these concenns for the future. The Committee met in closed session with the auditors. CONFERRAL OF LEAVE POLICY. The Committee Chairman asked that this item be continued until the next meeting and included in a report covering all of the Districts' leave policies. FINANCIAL PROGRAM MANUALS. The Committee Chairman asked that these draft manuals be resubmitted for the Committee's Consideration at the next meeting in order to provide the Directors with more time to review them. STATUS REPORT ON REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS. In 1993, the Boards authorized two $50 million Reverse Repurchase Agreements v (Reverse Repos) through the County Treasurers Office. At the April 1994 Fiscal Policy Committee meeting, the Committee reviewed a status report on the Reverse Repurchase Program, and directed staff to remain in the Reverse Repo Program. Since the last Fiscal Policy Committee meeting, the Treasurers Office has completed a rollover for each of the Districts' Reverse Repos. The results of these rollovers are summarized as follows: "ROLLOVER FNMA REVERSAL DATE COUPON RATE RATE PRICE MATURITY DAY ARBITRAGE' Sept 26 5.10% 5.00% $9325 Oct.26 30 0.10°h Oct.3 4.94% 4.97% $91.00 Nov.3 31 As previously reported to the Committee, staff monitors the price of these two FNMA securities using the on-line Bloomberg financial information system; reviews the Reverse Repo program periodically with the County Treasurers Office; and gathers market comparison information from other sources. As of October 13, 1994. the Bloomberg System reported the value of each security as follows: Minutes of Finance & Personnel Committee ,r Page 3 October 19, 1994 CUSIP NO. Coupon Market Price 31364AYT3 5.10% 97'/y 31364AH62 4.94% 91'/� It should be noted that the investment strategy of the Treasurer's Office seeks to maximize return on investment for the Districts, given prevailing market conditions at the time of rollover. Upon receiving competitive bids on the rollover date, the Treasurer's Office selects the lowest cost bid, with the highest return. The maturity date for the rollover is contained in the bid. The performance of the Reverse Repurchase Agreement program from inception is summarized as follows: Period FNMA Term Arbitrage Earnings 04/28/93-10/28/93 5.10% 183 Days $498,217.00 10/28/93-04/28/94 5.10% 182 Days 458.286.00 11/01/93-05/02/94 4.94% 182 Days 410,410.00 Subtotal $1,366,913.00 04/28/94-07127/94 5.10% 90 Days $113,750.00 05/02/94-08/01/94 4.94% 91 Days 72,800.00 Subtotal 186,550.00 07/27/94-08/26/94 5.10% 30 Days $29,167.00 08101/94-09/01/94 4.94% 31 Days 24,111.00 Subtotal 53,278.00 5.10% 08/25194-09/26/94 4.94% 32 Days $16,000.00 09/01194-10103/94 32 Days 8,889.00 Subtotal 24,889.00 09/26194-10/26194 5.10% 30 Days $4,167.00 10/03194-11/03194 4.94% 31 Days '12,917,00, Subtotal (8,750,00) TOTAL $1.622.880.00 Minutes of Finance & Personnel Committee Page 4 October 19, 1994 The October 3 transaction was completed at a small interest cost in order to maintain reserve balances in the County Pool which are yielding more than the underlying FNMA. STATUS REPORT ON TAXABLE COMMERCIAL PAPER PROGRAM. The Fiscal Policy Committee approved $50 million Taxable Commercial Paper Program (TCPP)for the Districts started in January 1994. The TCPP allows the Districts to borrow for working capital and maintenance and operations (M&O) funding requirements, while operating reserves remain on deposit with the County Treasurer eaming interest in excess of program costs. The TCPP presents no tax consequences to the Districts, although investors are subject to federal taxation. Because portions of the $50 million TCPP mature on different dates and under different market conditions, interest rates will change with each maturity, resale and revised term length. The Committee received charts and graphs showing that the Districts' TCPP is currently earning a 3.0% positive arbitrage spread, with average TCPP interest rates paid of 4.18%. 1990-92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM COP INTEREST RATE MONITORING. Between the December 1990 issuance of the Series "A" COPS and September 1993, the Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed detailed spreadsheets of interest costs and interest earnings for the 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program COP issues. A revised report has been reviewed periodically by the Fiscal Policy Committee, and was presented to the Finance and Personnel Committee. The report and the results of the COP program from inception to date are summarized in the following table: Average Net, Issue Issue Average Interest Ingrest Desc�rbon Date Amount Paid o^Re681Vios, IN Series 12/90 $100,000,000 2,71% 8.27% 5.56% Series 8(Net)' 04/91 39,465,000 6.86%— 8.41% 1.55% 1992 Refunding— 11/92 41.081.000 5.55% 7.78% 2.23% 1993 Refunding 09/93 46,000,000 4.56% 7.54% 2,98% Sedes C 09/92 98,500,000 2.25% 7.88% 663% 4.129A 8.16% 4.04% 'Odgmal issue size was$117,555,000. —Excludes$119,519,000 allocated to 1986 COPS of Districts 1,2&3. "'$6,900,000 earnings from SWAP would reduce fixed rate by 1.96%for the first three years to 4.9%. The construction reserves that have been maintained at the County Treasurer have earned an average of 8.16% since the inception of the 1990-92 COP program. Thus, the Directors' decision to borrow rather than to spend down our reserves has resulted in net interest earnings of$40.2 million on the reserves over this time period. Minutes of Finance & Personnel Committee Page 5 October 19, 1994 4 ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER'S ANNUAL 1993-94 SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATEMENT. The Orange County Treasurer provides banking and investment services for the Districts in accordance with our adopted investment policy. The Treasurer has recently issued the annual Summary Financial Statement of the County Treasury for 1993-94 (tan), which was reviewed by the Committee. During 1993-94, gross interest earnings at the County Treasury for all of the Sanitation Districts totaled $27,993,815; earned at an average yield for the fiscal year of 7.74%. While the Treasurer's average yield is down from last year's 8.25%, the Districts' gross interest earnings increased by $3,734,323, due to larger available investment balances and the Reverse Repurchase Program. The net yield was 7.67% after payment of 0.07% to the Orange County Treasurer for their services. FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEM. At the August 1993 meeting of the Special Joint Works Selection Committee, staff was authorized to issue requests for proposals (RFP) for the selection and implementation of a new financial information system (FIS). The current system, designed in 1977 and installed in 1979, has been periodically upgraded and modified as it has been cost-effective to do so, but is inadequate today. J Subsequent to the August authorization, staff solicited proposals from and interviewed qualified firms for providing professional consulting services in connection with the selection and implementation of a new FIS. At their January meeting, the Committee reviewed a written report from the staff selection team (Finance Director, Information Services Manager, Accounting Manager) who had individually and collectively ranked the firm of Deloitte & Touche as first choice for the project. Following a presentation from staff and representatives of Deloitte & Touche, the Committee reviewed all of the information they had received, the project scope, the needs of the Districts and the budget and cost impacts of the project, and made three recommendations: 1 . That Deloitte & Touche be selected to perform the Phase I, Detailed Needs Assessment; and Phase ll, Develop Specifications for a Formal RFP for hardware and software for a new FIS for an amount not to exceed $150,000. 2. That the detailed needs assessment should be in two phases with a preliminary report to be presented to the Special Selection Committee after Deloitte & Touche had an opportunity to perform the initial on-site analysis and review. Minutes of Finance & Personnel Committee Page 6 October 19, 1994 3. Upon completion of Phases I and II, the Committee should review and evaluate the appropriate scope of work for Phase III, the selection process for hardware and software, and Phase IV, the implementation and acceptance of the selected hardware and software solutions. Selection of Deloitte & Touche At the regular February 1994 meeting, the Joint Boards adopted Resolution No. 94-16 approving a professional services agreement with Deloitte & Touche for Selection of a New Financial Information System, Specification No. S-072, on an hourly rate basis including labor, overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus out-of-pocket costs, for an amount not to exceed $150,000 for Phase 1, Detailed Needs Assessment; and Phase 11, Develop Specifications for a Formal RFP. Staff and Deloitte & Touche have completed the Phase II work that the Special Selection Committee requested and have prepared an extensive Request for Proposals to provide software and hardware which will be mailed subsequent to the approval of the new Finance and Personnel Committee. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche attended the Committee meeting to review their work and work products to date, and to discuss the future direction of our search for a new Financial Information System. Committee Action The Chairman asked that an ad hoc subcommittee be formed to review the draft RFP and to report to the Committee next month. CONSIDERATION OF UPCOMING MEETING DATES. The regular meeting date for the Finance and Personnel Committee is the 3rd Wednesday of each month. Consequently, the next meeting will be November 16, 1994. ADJOURNMENT The inaugural meeting of the Finance and Personnel Committee was adjourned at 8:00 p.m. GGS:lc �:wvoocnmcw,raruuvcftrcutrvct osa Enclosures ROBERT L."BOB'CITRON COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR ADMINISTRATION HALL OF FINANCE A RECORDS RM.G76.12 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA P.O.BOX 45t5 SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA 92702 • . ITIAI SU-nl1 FAX: (714)834.2912 ESTABLISHED I069 OFFICE OF THE TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR September 26, 1994 Board of Supervisors 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 SUBJECT: Annual 1993-94 Summary Financial Statement This is my 22nd annual Financial Statement. Although it is officially sent to your Honorable Board, a great percentage of the 187 different agencies for whom we invest are not under the control of your Honorable Board. We manage funds for 28 cities in Orange County and 6 cities outside of Orange County, 32 school districts, 5 community college districts and 53 special district accounts of which four are outside of Orange County. There are 31 different agencies that are governed by your Honorable Board of which the largest revenues for investments are from the County General Fund, the John Wayne Airport, Environmental Management Agency and the Integrated Waste Management Department. There are also very large sums of money that are �..i sent to us by the municipal and superior court systems throughout Orange County for investment until needed. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATEMENT: We earned an average yield for the fiscal year of 7.74% based upon an average monthly investable balance of $7.177 billion, a $2.480 billion increase •average over the previous fiscal year. Our average yield for the fiscal year of 7.74% can be favorably compared to the U.S. Treasury 30-year maturity bond average yield of 6.65% for the same fiscal year period. The 2-year U.S. Treasury Note, which compares to our 2.5 years average maturity, yielded for the same fiscal year 5. 034. The 5-year maturity U.S. Treasury yielded an average 5.96% for the same 1993-94 fiscal year. The State of California Treasury with an average monthly balance of $25.449 billion had an average yield of 4.39%. In comparing these interest yields, it should be stated that the State investment pool average monthly maturity for the fiscal year was 392 days (one year, one month) ; whereas, the Orange County Treasury average monthly maturity was 834 days (two years, five months) . The Orange County Treasury has participants that tend to leave their monies longer invested than with the State. The State operates like a mutual fund, where large sums of funds go in and out daily; whereas the County Treasury is able to manage its cash flows more effectively and invest longer out on the yield curve. The following indicates the consistency we have earned in yearly yields. From January 191 thru June •94 (42 months) our average yield was 8.64%. In the last six fiscal years from 1988-89 thru 1993-94, our average yield was 8.65%. In the previous 10 fiscal years, our average yield was 8.90%. Board of Supervisors . Page 2 September 26, 1994 , The total interest earnings received and paid out from investments was an all time high of $665,868, 000. The total interest earnings are prorated amongst our governmental clients based upon the average daily balance that they have on deposit in the County Treasury. Our investors are charged an investment fee which is approximately 7/100% (7 basis points) . This fee covers the cost of providing investment services. This investment fee is less than investors would pay to professional management companies, who often charge as much as 90 basis points. For example, during the past year, a $10 million investment in our treasury pool would have earned $774, 000 of interest income and would have been charged $7,000 for investment management services. The same $10 million would have been charged as much as $90, 000 in management fees by a private investment manager or mutual fund. The actual net amounts of receipts that we received was $9,768, 171, 000. This is accounted for as follows: AMOUNT % OF TOTAL TAX COLLECTIONS $2, 121,850, 000 21.725% SHORT TERM LOANS 935, 184, 000 9.574% BONDS (NOTES) 44,580,000 .456% STATE SUBVENTIONS 1,861,387,000 19.056% INTEREST RECEIVED 665,868,000 6.816% OTHER (Court Fines/Fees, 4 , 139 ,302,000 42 .373% Recorder Fees, Licenses & Permits, etc. ) TOTAL $9,768,171,000 100.00% The total receipts (cash flow) from all sources including the rollover ox'.' reinvestment of securities was $300.894 billion, an increase of $70.669 billion over the previous fiscal year. We continue to use Reverse Repurchase Agreements as part of our investment strategy. In the fiscal year just ended, we earned an additional $251,334, 000 through Reverse Repurchase Agreements which is the equivalent of adding a 2% yield to our portfolio. During the past year, concerns have been raised about investment funds taking "paper" losses which represent the difference between the original cost of securities and the current market value of those securities. In periods of rising interest rates, securities purchased one year ago are worth less today than when they were originally purchased. The losses are called "paper" losses because they are based upon accounting adjustments in which investment portfolios are adjusted to reflect current market values. An actual gain or loss would only be incurred if the investor sells the security prior to its maturity date. Some investment funds regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are required to periodically adjust the cost of their portfolios to reflect current market values which may result in a paper gain or loss. Governmental accounting standards do not require municipal investment pools to make this periodic adjustment. Therefore, we are not required to record "paper" gains or losses. Ronan L. 'Bco Glenn Orange Count,Tiersurenlaa Collector Steele AN.Cal.—. Board of Supervisors Page 3 September 26, 1994 An actual investment gain or loss would only occur if we were to sell a _ security before its scheduled maturity date. Under our reverse repurchase investment strategy, we hold nearly all of our securities until maturity and rarely have recorded actual gains or losses. THE FUTURE: In June 1993 we made our annual estimate for budgetary purposes that we would earn a 7.50% return on investments. We earned overall for our investors 7.74%. Although past results are not always an indicator of future investment returns, we believe our portfolio will continue to perform well. At this writing, there is a controversy on the direction of interest rates. The Federal Reserve System has tightened or increased interest rates by 1.75% since last February. It is generally believed that they will increase interest rates another .25% or more after the November elections. There are many others who believe that the Federal Reserve will increase rates not only before the November elections but will increase them overall by 1% on the high side by next year. The many economic figures that are issued by the Federal government monthly sometimes show large percentage increases over what they were the previous year. But, at this writing, the figures that have come out in September in the main hardly show any increases (some down) over the figures issued in July and August. Although we have modest growth, we are beginning to see figures that may indicate that the economy may be slowing down; and I believe we will not continue to see this allegedly fast growth over what it was a year ago. Some economists believe that approximately a year from now that when these monthly economic statistics are issued by the Federal government that they will be compared to those same economic category figures issued in the third and fourth quarters of 1994 and will only show small increases in comparison to the large year-to-year increases now. The great majority of economic soothsayers have not seen the prospect of runaway inflation that, in fact, inflationary pressures have been under control. Large and medium range corporations are still restructuring. First Interstate Bank is going to downsize by 3, 000 employees. Hughes Aircraft is going to lay off approximately 4,500 employees. Northrup Aircraft will downsize 9,000 nationwide. American Airlines will reduce their payroll by 3,000. You read, it seems like every week, that some large employer, not confined only to the West Coast, is still consolidating and laying off people. The national zconomy has seemed to be able to absorb these people as the monthly unemployment figures indicate. But wage settlements have been modest; certainly not at all inflationary. A large percentage of those that were laid off have found new positions at lower salaries than they were making in their previous positions. Although it is necessary to go back historically to indicate what occurred in business expansions that occurred after recessions, this recovery has been different. We do not have the large inflationary wage increases, run away building, both in homes, commercial, and those tall glass office buildings. Though office building vacancy rates are coming down, they are still high enough that few, if any, tall office buildings are being built. A further major difference with this recovery over previous ones is that governmental entities are not making those large capital expenditures that helped fuel the economy nationwide in previous expansions. All government entities are scrimping to find funds so as they will not have to lay off governmental employees or discontinue necessary services. They are even having tax override elections to adequately fund their public safety departments. In F L B Cnron C,anya County Tta..r-iaa C.I.V Sanu b .Cmfo,n,a Board of Supervisors Page 4 September 26, 1994 the main, they are not making capital improvements to any extent than what occurred in the 170's and 1801s. Historically, previous expansions lasted four years, the exception was the Reagan expansion of eight years. The current expansion is in its second year going into its third year. The bellwether Federal Funds (Fed Funds) Rate, which the Federal Reserve system uses to reduce or increase interest rates is currently at 4.75%. I believe that at their November 15, 1994 meeting the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) governors will vote to raise the Fed Funds Rate to not above 5.25%. I believe that the 30 year maturity U.S. Treasury bond which, at this writing, is yielding 7.75% to 7 .80% could be as high as 8.00% at the end of the year, but will come down from that level in the first and second quarter of 1995 and trade in the 7 . 50% to 7.75% range. The five year U.S. Treasury Note, whose yield is now considered at the middle of the interest yield curve is yielding, at this writing, between 7. 15% and 7.20% and could go to 7. 30% but is not sustainable above this rate. I believe that contrary to many economists predictions, the Fed Funds Rate will not go above 5.25% this year. In fact, this rate could remain in place for some time. The 3. 00% Fed Funds Rate that began to rise last February to its present 4.75% was at 3.00% for 17 months, although it stayed at 3.00% for different economic reasons than are now in place. On September 24, 1994 the National Association of Manufactures declaring that their businesses are prospering and their hiring is up, urged the Federal Reserve System not to raise interest rates again this year. They said higher rates would endanger their and the nation's prosperity. The low mortgage interest rates of 1993 that fueled home buying have risen 2 .00% to a point that could put a damper on home sales in comparison to what was occurrinc in 1993. Certainly the billions of dollars of home refinancing has ended. I do not wish to be accused of being a cassandra regarding the economy. I do believe that we have positive moderate growth. We do not see inflation to the degree that supports present day interest rates. When Allen Greenspan, Chairman of the FOMC announced the first tightening of interest rates by raising the Fed Funds Rate a quarter of a percent from 3. 00% to 3.25%, he said this was a "preemptive strike" against inflation; that the Federal Reserve was going to make sure that there wasn't any inflation in the future. The "market" reacted by raising interest yields to much more than the quarter of a percent increase. , The market continued to overreact to the next three interest rate rises when the Fed Funds Rate reached 4.25% The market rallied when the Fed Funds Rate was raised 50 basis points to its present 4 .75%, but interest rates have since risen from those levels, on perception on what future economic numbers will be and what the Federal Reserve will do. The predictions of economists were defined by George Bernard Shaw who said, "If you take all of the world's economists and laid them end to end, they still could not come to a conclusion. " I also like the definition of an economist of when you forget your telephone number, that when you ask an economist to remember it for you, he will estimate it! I do not at all in any way, pretend to be a professional economist. The rather successful high interest yields we have obtained in previous years (as stated here previously) would indicate that we have been able to-1- interpret current and future markets to our advantage. Like economists, w, Raaav L. 90n Cmmn Orange Caunry Treasurer*a.Coueaar Santa Ana.Camarma Board of Supervisors Page 5 September 26, 1994 are not always right. (Do you remember Henry Kaufman?) In last year's , Financial Statement, I said we would' have the maintenance of low interest rates, that high interest rates were not sustainable. I and many others did not foresee the Federal Reserve taking their "preemptive strike." There was not then, and there is not now, inflationary factors that would require the Federal Reserve to tighten credit by 1.75%, as stated previously by many economists. Former President Harry Truman once defined that a successful leader or business head made the correct decisions 80% of the time. I believe I and the great majority of those reading this report fall into this category. Where we may differ is that I realize that my decisions could be wrong as much as 20% of the time. This probability of error keeps me diligent to see that any miscalculations of economic conditions do not have an overly negative effect on our investors. We have constructed a well-balanced portfolio that we believe can withstand the impact of current interest rates. I believe that the many years of consistent positive results of our investment strategy indicates that our decisions have been correct much more than 80% of the time! The Treasury also has performed other services to the County and its constituent agencies. We have been responsible for managing the County's short term debt issuance program, and have provided information and assistance in some long term debt issuances. While we do not provide these services for all participants in the investment pool, we have provided assistance to the school districts in Orange County who issue short term debt obligations. To be able over the years to assist all the agencies for whom we invest by providing respectable returns on their investment dollars is very gratifying. We are proud to know that in some way we have assisted local governments in maintaining their level and quality of service. Investment earnings allow educational districts to continue to provide necessary programs to students, and has allowed cities and the County to better manage the decreasing financial support from the State. To be able to have such a beneficial impact on the citizens of Orange County is extremely satisfying to me, and more importantly to my remarkably professional Treasury staff. Robert L. Citron Treasurer-Tax Collector , RLC:jg Attachment cc: school Business Directors City Treasurers/Finance Directors Special District Treasurers and Finance Directors Room L. Ban Cll o Oraye Lounry neam,e,,Taa CNn 1a 1 Santa Ma.Cammnia ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER-TAR COLLECTOR ACCOUNTABILITY INDICATED DATES (000e OMITTED) .... FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30 JUNE 30 JUNE 30 1994 1993 1992 CASH AND BANK ACCOUNTS 535,768 376,681 179,546 COMMINGLED FUNDS INVESTED 5,127,141 4,177,531 3,476,015 SPECIFIC FUNDS INVESTED 1,820,581 924,055 136.201 TREASURER'S TOTAL ACCOUNTABILITY 7.483.490 5.478.267 3.791,762 CASH ACTnTrY INDICATED DATES 0009 OMITTED) FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30 JUNE 30 JUNE 30 1994 1993 1992 BEGINNING OF YEAR CHECKING ACCOUNTS AND CASH 38,181 60,984 39,933 TOTAL RECER'TS-FISCAL YEAR 300.855.990 230,163.594 172.114.104 SUBTOTAL 300.894,171 230,224,568 172.154,037 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS-FISCAL YEAR (300.643.403) (230.186.387) (172.093.053) END OF YEAR CHECKING ACCOUNTS AND CASH 250,768 38.181 60,984 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California r P.O. Box 8127 • 108"Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE SUBCOMMITTEE FRIDAY, OCTOBER 14, 1994 -3:00 P.M. A meeting of the Executive Subcommittee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Friday, October 14, 1994, at 3:00 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE SUBCOMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Present: Larry Seigel, Ernst & Young Elizabeth Van Denburgh, Ernst& Young John C. Cox, Jr., Chair Mani Mani, Emsl&Young Peer A. Swan, Vice Chair Gordon Culp, Smith Culp Consulting John J. Collins Ted Tamura, Grand Jury John M. Gullixson Viola Sadler, Grand Jury Barry Hammond Diane West, Grand Jury Roger Stanton STAFF PRESENT: Absent: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager J. Wayne Sylvester Sal A. Sapien Gary Streed, Director of Finance Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Margaret H. Nellor, Director of Technical Services Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations John Linder, Director of Engineering Don Crapnell, Construction Manager Gerald Jones, Maintenance Staff Doug Cook, Chief Plant Operator, Plant 2 Nick Arhontes, Maintenance Staff John Dettle, Engineering Staff David Frederick, Finance Staff Tod Haynes, Construction Management Staff APPROVAL OF MINUTES. The minutes of the September 28, 1994, Executive Subcommittee were approved as drafted. Minutes of the Executive Subcommittee October 14, 1994 Page 2 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE SUBCOMMITTEE. (a) Phase 2 Studv: Improvement of the Capital Projects Management Process At the August 10, 1994 Board Meeting, the Directors approved the Ernst & Young Phase 1 Capital Projects Management Process Recommendations and authorized the Phase 2 Study on the Improvements of the Capital Projects Management Process. The report was created through the efforts of a team of Districts' staff who met two days-per-week for six weeks. Mid-level supervisors and project managers from the Operations, Maintenance, Technical Services, Engineering and Finance Departments made up the review team. Ernst & Young facilitated the process and created the final draft report. Representatives of Ernst & Young briefed the Subcommittee on the major points of the draft recommendations resulting from the Phase 2 Study and a summary of the draft report is included as Attachment A (salmon). (b) Phase 3 Study: Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance Functions At the August 10, 1994 Board Meeting, the Directors approved the Ernst & Young Phase 3 Study regarding the Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance. The report was prepared by Ernst & Young after conducting interviews and group discussions with a large number of staff from the Operations and Maintenance Departments, tours of the plants and reviewing operational and budgetary data. Ernst & Young briefed the Subcommittee on the major points of the draft recommendations resulting from the study. A summary of the draft report is included as Attachment B (lavender). (c) Discussion by Subcommittee Regarding Ernst & Young Reports The Subcommittee discussed a few of the major points of the reports and how next to proceed. Members of the Subcommittee indicated an interest in providing some comments on the draft reports and Ernst & Young indicated they would like comments from both the Subcommittee and Districts' staff. A deadline of October 21 was set for Ernst & Young to receive comments prior to finalizing the two reports. There was also considerable discussion about how to best implement the recommendations provided within the two reports. It was pointed out that the recommendations were only a start. Without implementation by staff in a coordinated medium-term and long-term plan, the effectiveness of the reports would be limited. `/ Minutes of the Executive Subcommittee October 14, 1994 Page 3 The Subcommittee will await the final report and further input from Districts' management and Ernst & Young on an implementation plan which will be reviewed at a future meeting of the Subcommittee. REPORT OF STAFF RE TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT STAFFING PROPOSAL. As part of the Subcommittee's consideration of the Phase 3 Work Plan, the Subcommittee had previously requested a report from the Director of Technical Services on a proposal to realign a portion of the responsibilities performed within the Department. Following a report by Ms. Nellor and a general discussion with the Committee, she stated that she would consult with our sister agencies who conduct similar work under their normal scope of activities to develop a range of organizational alternatives; and that she will consult with Ernst & Young to develop a focused Scope of Work, which would then be the subject of an evaluation by Ernst & Young, and propose it at a future meeting of the Subcommittee. MEMBER AGENCY REPRESENTATION ON DISTRICTS' BOARDS. The Ernst & Young Phase 3 proposal included an item to review the composition, organization and processes performed by the Board. The Board committee structure has been revised and the Directors have turned their attention to the issue of member agency representation on the Districts' Boards. The existing statutory provisions were reviewed. Currently the Districts have 42 Board members. Under the existing law, if a different councilmember or board member of each member agency's governing body represented them on each Sanitation Board on which the member agency has a seat, the Sanitation Districts could have a total of 55 Directors. Recognizing this, in 1983, when there were only seven Districts instead of the current nine, the Boards of Directors adopted policy Resolution No. 83-34 urging each member agency to appoint only one of its members as the single representative Director for the member agency on all of the Districts within its boundaries. (The only exception would be in Districts 5 and 6 where two city representatives would be necessary to fulfill the three member minimum Board requirement.) If all member agencies subscribed to this policy it would reduce the directorship from the current 42 Board Members to 27. It was observed that every community that the Districts serve has a vested interest in the Districts' operations and that the reduction to 27 Directors would still provide for all member agencies to continue to have a voice in the important work of the Sanitation Districts, while at the same time optimizing the efficiency and size of the Boards. The Joint Chair pointed out that a considerable number of our Directors are retiring from public office this year and, as a result, the upcoming general election will bring with it a significant turnover in Board membership. He stated that this affords the Districts an excellent opportunity to reduce the size of the Boards in accordance with the aforementioned policy. Minutes of the Executive Subcommittee - October 14, 1994 Page 4 The Committee also discussed other options for reducing the size of the Boards, including: limiting compensation of Directors from member agencies with multiple seats; legislative changes to limit the number of Directors; and consolidation of the existing nine Districts into a single sanitation district. The Committee also discussed the pros and cons of alternate directors as provided for in the statute, and the option of continuing the existing organizational structure without change. The Joint Chair stated that he is preparing to send a letter to all Board members regarding this issue and it would list the alternatives. ADJOURNMENT. The Executive Subcommittee adjourned at approximately 5:30 p.m. i.\wpdcc�gmmxemiaia9a esm II County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL EXECUTIVE SEARCH COMMITTEE OCTOBER 26, 1994-4:00 P.M. A meeting of the Special Executive Search Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, October 26, 1994, at 4:00 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: SPECIAL EXECUTIVE SEARCH COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Robert W. Murray, David M. Griffith & John C. Cox, Jr., Chair Associates, Ltd. Peer A. Swan John J. Collins Don R. Griffin STAFF PRESENT: Pat McGuigan Roger Stanton None William Steiner Absent: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES. The minutes of the October 5, 1994 Special Executive Search Committee were approved as drafted. REVIEW AND FINALIZE PROFILE FOR SEARCH FOR NEW GENERAL MANAGER. At the last meeting, the Committee interviewed firms and selected David M. Griffith & Associates, Ltd., to conduct the executive search for a new General Manager. Mr. Robert W. Murray, Vice President, presented a draft profile in the form of a recruitment brochure, based on interviews with the Committee members. Qualities that will form the profile of the successful applicant include education, experience, leadership, integrity and communication skills. The successful candidate must be able to establish benchmarks and measurable performance criteria and hold staff accountable to those criteria. The recruitment schedule includes advertising in select periodicals during December, receiving applications until mid-January, interviews in February and Board approval in March, 1995. ADJOURNMENT. The Special Executive Search Committee adjourned at approximately 5:10 p.m. ]:W pAxam W ecn OZ�/.sem COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 01 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10 EWB AVEMIE R0.BOA 8127 f WAIN VALLEY,CALRORMAMM.6129 91I16624.11 October 20, 1994 MEMORANDUM TO: John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair RE: Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business of the Districts Director John M. Gullixson has requested that the governing rules of procedure be placed on the Executive Committee agenda to review the rules of procedure and take any actions deemed appropriate. Blake P. Anderson General Manager BPA/pk 1omo2.« RESOLUTION NO. 87-51 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FIXING AND ESTABLISHING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CONDUCT OF BUSINESS OF THE DISTRICTS, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NOS. 64-3. 67-52, 67-79, 70-154, 71-90, 72-11, 73-81, 76-10, 76-18, 77-140, 79-103, 84-92, 85-5-13, 86-1-14 AND ALL OTHER RESOLUTIONS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED BY THESE BOARDS WITH REGARD TO MEETING PROCEDURES (AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NOS. 89-56 ADOPTED JUNE 14, 1989 AND 91-35 ADOPTED MARCH 13, 1991) WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish rules of procedure to facilitate the orderly handling of business to cane before the Joint Administrative Organization of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California; and, WHEREAS, these Boards from time to time have established rules of procedure and from time to time have amended said rules so that different aspects of said procedures are to be found in a number of resolutions and motions; and, WHEREAS, it is desirable and appropriate to update, consolidate, simplify and clarify the existing rules of procedure into one document readily accessible to the Directors, staff and general public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section A. That any procedures set forth in the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement effective July 1, 1985, as amended, hereinafter referred to as "Joint Agreement', in conflict with the procedures set forth herein, take precedence. Section B. That the following rules of procedure be adopted for the conduct of business of the Joint Administrative Organization and of each County Sanitation District of Orange County, party to the Joint Agreement: -1- 1. REGULAR MEETINGS - There shall be a regular monthly meeting of the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, which are parties to the Joint Agreement, on the second Wednesday of every month at 7:30 p.m., in the Joint Administrative offices of the Districts at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California; provided, however, if the second Wednesday of the month falls upon a legal holiday, said monthly meeting shall be held on the next day thereafter, at the same time and place unless the Board adjourns to a different date time certain. The Board of Directors may adjourn any regular, special or adjourned special meeting to a time and place certain, as specified in the order of adjournment. 2. SPECIAL MEETINGS - A special meeting of the Board of Directors of any District may be called in either one of the following ways: (a) By the Chairman of the Board of Directors of said District; (b) By the written request of a majority of the Directors of the District delivered to the Board Secretary. A special meeting of the Directors of the Joint Administrative Organization may be called by the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization or by a majority of the Executive Committee. The call or notice for special meeting shall be in writing and delivered personally or by mail at least twenty-four (24) hours before the time of such meeting as specified in the notice. Any notice deposited in the regular mail addressed to a Director at the address on file with the Board Secretary postage prepaid, sixty (60) hours in advance of any such meeting as specified in the notice, shall be presumed to have been delivered. The call or notice shall specify the time and place of the special meeting, a description of the business to be transacted, and copies of all pertinent written materials. `/ -2- Such written notice may be dispensed with as to any Director or alternate Director who, at or prior to the time the meeting convenes, files . with the Board Secretary a written waiver of notice. Such waiver may be given by telegram. Such written notice may also be dispensed with as to any member who is actually present at the meeting at the time it convenes. The Board Secretary shall diligently attempt to notify each Director personally of the time, place and purpose of said meeting not less than twenty-four (24) hours before the time of said meetings. 3. MEETINGS ADJOURNED BY BOARD SECRETARY - If at any regular, adjourned regular, special , or adjourned special meeting, there is not a quorum of Directors present, the Board Secretary may declare the meeting adjourned to a stated time and place and shall cause written notice of the adjournment to be given in the same manner as for a special meeting unless such notice is waived as provided for special meetings. A copy of the order or notice of adjournment shall be conspicuously posted on or near the door of the place where the meeting was held within twenty-four (24) hours after the time of the adjournment. 4. NOTICES TO NEWS MEDIA - When any local newspaper of general circulation, radio or television station requests, in writing, notices of meetings of the Board of Directors of any District or of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Board Secretary shall thereafter, until receipt of a notice terminating said request, deliver notices of regular, regular adjourned, special and special adjourned meetings to such newspaper, radio or television stations. Delivery shall be made in the same manner as delivery is made to the Directors. 5. RULES OF ORDER - The business to come before each individual District, and before all the member Districts, as part of the business of the Joint Administrative Organization, shall be carried on and conducted in -3- accordance with the provisions of the latest Edition of "Robert's Rules of Order Revised", a copy of which is on file in the office of the Board Secretary of the Joint Administrative Organization, except where the special provisions hereinafter set forth conflict therewith. 6. QUORUM - A majority of the Directors in five of the nine County Sanitation Districts of Orange County constituting the members of the Joint Administrative Organization shall constitute a quorum of the Joint Administrative Organization. 7. CHAIRMAN OF THE DISTRICT - A Chairman (and Chairman pro tem) shall be elected by majority vote as the first order of business by the members of each District Board of Directors at the first meeting in May of each year, and said Chairman (and Chairman pro tem) shall serve at the pleasure of the majority of said members. 8. CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION - A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year. The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications for the office of Chairman. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July regular meeting. The nominations and election for Vice Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in July of each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Joint Chairman. The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Chairman becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the -4- expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairman shall automatically succeed to the office of the Chairman and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Vice Chairman becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular tern, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly-scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Districts. 9. PRESIDING OFFICER - The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall preside during meetings of the Directors of the Joint Administrative Organization. In the absence of the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall preside. When the Directors of a District are meeting concurrently with the Directors of the other Districts for the conduct of Joint Administrative Organization business, any business for consideration and action by the District will be acted upon under the Chairmanship of the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization except when delegated to the District Chairman. 10. BOARD SECRETARY AND MINUTES - The Boards of Directors of the Joint Administrative Organization shall appoint a person to serve as Board Secretary at the pleasure of the Boards. Said person shall also be the Board Secretary of each of the individual Districts, parties to the Joint Agreement. The Secretary shall attend all meetings of the Boards of Directors, unless excused by the Chairman, and shall prepare an accurate record of each meeting for submission to the Directors and subsequent approval at the following meeting; provided, however, that when an adjourned, special or special adjourned meeting of the Board of Directors -5- immediately precedes a regular meeting, minutes of said meeting shall be submitted for approval at the next meeting of the Board following said regular meeting. In the preparation of Official Minutes of a meeting of the Board of Directors, the Secretary will not record the name of the Director who moves or who seconds the adoption of a motion or resolution. In the absence of the Board Secretary, a Secretary pro tem shall be appointed to exercise the duties of the Board Secretary. 11. REGULAR BUSINESS TO COME BEFORE THE DIRECTORS OF THE JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION - Insofar as practicable, all items of business to be taken up at a regular meeting of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be submitted to the Board Secretary not later than the close of business on the Thursday preceding the first Wednesday of each month. The Board Secretary shall include on the agenda, as provided hereinabove, all items submitted by Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. The Board Secretary shall mail to each Director a notice of such regular meetings, together with a proposed agenda, not later than the Friday immediately preceding such regular meetings. Said agenda, insofar as possible, shall include copies of resolutions, except as hereafter provided, and a description of all matters to be considered, together with any pertinent written materials. Except as provided in Section 8.2., insofar as practicable, all items of business to be taken up at other duly called meetings of the Board of Directors, shall be submitted to the Board Secretary not later than 144 hours in advance of such meeting and the Board Secretary shall mail each Director a notice and agenda for such meeting not later than 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Agendas shall be posted in a location freely accessible to the public not less than 72 hours in advance of the meeting. -6- Resolutions designated as •standard" and adopted by the Boards of Directors from from time to time, and approved as to form and content, need not be included with said agenda; provided, however, that the information completing said standard resolutions shall be set forth on the agenda listing and copies of said completed standard resolutions shall be on file with the Secretary at the meeting time and place. Items of business not known at the time the regular agenda is mailed as herein provided, may be considered as a supplemental agenda item, provided that all requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act (California Government Code Section 54950 et seq.) are satisfied. No business, except with consent of a majority of the Districts present, and only if permitted by the Ralph M. Brown Act, not appearing on the regular or supplemental agendas may be brought before the Directors of the Joint Administrative Organization or its member Districts. The meeting agenda shall provide for an opportunity for members of the public to address the Board(s) on items of public interest. As determined .... by the Chairman, speakers may be referred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. 12. HANDLING OF BUSINESS AND VOTING - During the course of a Board meeting routine matters listed on the agenda for consideration will be referred to by Agenda Item Number only. Voting on all resolutions shall be by roll call except if waived by unanimous voice vote, in which event, the Chairman may order a unanimous ballot cast in favor of the motion or resolution under consideration. When a roll call vote is required on joint business of the Districts, and except as provided hereinafter, the name of each Director shall be called only once and the Director's vote regarded the same for each District represented, unless a Director expresses the desire to vote differently for any District represented, or unless a member of the Board -7- of Directors asks that each District be Individually polled. On matters of considerable interest or on which there appears to be a controversy, the motion or resolution shall be read by title or repeated by the Chairman. The Chairman shall thereafter call for discussion of the motion or resolution at which time any member may discuss the matter pending. Any person other than a Director present at the meeting may speak on the motion if recognized by the Chairman. Sole discretion as to the extent of discussion outside of the membership of the Board shall rest with the Chairman. At the close of discussion the Chairman may, at the Chairman's discretion, repeat the motion or resolution pending, and thereafter, call for vote. The Board Secretary shall determine and state whether or not a motion or resolution is adopted by roll call vote. On all other matters the Chairman shall determine the results of the vote. 13. STANDING COMMITTEES: (a) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - There shall be a permanent Committee .. designated as the Executive Committee which shall consist of the Chairman of the Board of Directors of each District, or other District Director as designated by the Chairman, the Directors who represent the Orange County Board of Supervisors, and the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. Each past Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall also serve as a member of the Executive Committee, provided that said person serves as an active Director of a District Board. Any person designated as an alternate member of the Executive Conittee must be an elected official of the same District as the regular Executive Committee member. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be the Chairman of the Executive Committee. The Committee may -8- fix a regular meeting time and place or may meet at the call of the Chairman. The Committee may consider any matters related to the Joint ownership, operation and construction of all the Districts and make recommendations thereon to the Joint Boards of Directors of the Districts. (b) FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - There shall be a permanent Fiscal Policy Committee to advise the staff in matters relative to the financial and budget policies of the Joint Administrative Organization. The Committee shall review with staff the procedures for development, preparation and format of the annual Joint Works budgets and recommend appropriate changes, and counsel the staff during the budget process to assure the proper interpretation and Implementation of the Boards' policies and that the desired procedures have been followed. The Committee is not responsible for recommending adoption of proposed budgets to the Executive Committee or the Boards of Directors. However, the Committee, at its discretion may so recommend and/or comment on said budgets as deemed appropriate by its members. The responsibility for consideration and adoption of the respective individual District budgets rests with each individual District Board. The Fiscal Policy Committee is further authorized to review other fiscal policy matters of the Joint Administrative Organization, or the Districts severally or individually, as assigned by the Executive Committee or Boards, and report findings and recommendations to the Executive Committee, such as: -9- - Recommendations of Districts- independent CPA Auditors - Revenue Program Policies - Procurement Policies - Insurance - Debt Financing Policies - Other studies and investigations, as requested by the Fiscal Policy Committee and approved by the Executive Committee The Committee shall consist of nine Directors appointed by the Joint Chairman. To the extent possible, the membership shall represent a cross section of the Districts. It is deemed desirable that at least one member of the Executive Committee be a member of the Fiscal Policy Committee. The Chairman of the Fiscal Policy Committee shall be appointed by the Joint Chairman. The Fiscal Policy Committee shall meet at the call of its Chairman." (c) SELECT COMMITTEE TO ADVISE THE STAFF - There shall be a ...- permanent Committee designated as the Select Committee to Advise the Staff which will give advice and guidance to the staff, consider special matters and make recommendations in such matters to the Boards. Membership of the Committee shall consist of the Chairman and the Vice Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization and other senior Directors or Directors with a specific interest in a matter before the Committee, as appointed by the Chal rnan of the Joint Administrative Organization. 14. MOTION TO REFER TO A STANDING COMMITTEE - Any Director at a Joint Administrative Organization meeting may move to have any matter of policy, -10- or other activity affecting the members of the Joint Administrative Organization or any one of the member Districts, referred to a Standing Committee for study and report. This motion shall be a privileged motion and when duly seconded, discussion thereof shall be limited to Directors only. Said motion shall receive an affirmative vote of a majority of the Districts for adoption. 15. SPECIAL COMMITTEES - Except for the Executive Committee, Fiscal Policy Committee and Select Committee to Advise the Staff, there shall be no permanent committees of the Directors of the Joint Administrative Organization. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization may, upon the Chairman's own motion or upon motion of a majority of the Districts affected, appoint from time to time special or ad hoc committees to study and report on special matters affecting the Joint Administrative Organization; provided that where such committees are to be authorized to act in the name of the Board of Directors, such authorization shall be given only by a majority vote of the Directors after the committee is appointed. Section C. That Resolution Nos. 64-3, 67-52, 67-79, 70-154, 71-90, 72-11, 73-81, 76-10, 76-18, 77-140, 79-103, 84-92, 85-5-13, 86-1-14 and all other Resolutions previously adopted by these Boards with regard to meeting procedures are hereby repealed; and that all Resolutions or motions or portions thereof in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded and made of no further effect. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 10, 1987. -11- JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 9, 1994 Agenda Item 11 (b)(1 ): Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver, Inc. for design and construction services required for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No.1-44, and Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53, providing for additional design and construction support services, for consideration by the Boards at a future date. Summary For more detailed information on the proposed action, please see the attached Staff Report dated November 2, 1994. Enaineerina and Construction Committee Recommendation The Committee recommends authorizing staff to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Holmes and Narver, Inc. for planning, design and construction services relative to the Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No P1-44, and Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53, providing for changes to the original Scope of Work to delete preparation of the Emergency Response Plan and delete design services related to soil stability under structures, and to add design services to provide strategic positioning of emergency repair supplies and equipment, and associated construction support services, for an estimated net add of$190,000. Following the negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Committee and the Boards for further consideration. vrytlxydcas11b1 io9.94 -1- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' M ORANGE COUNTY. CAUEORNIA 10844 EW6 AVENUE November 2, 1994 vo.WXa127 FOUWAIN VALLEY.CAUMMIA 92728.8127 9141862.2411 STAFF REPORT Proposed Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver, Inc., for additional design and construction services for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44, and Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53 In March 1993, the Directors approved a $1,997,510 Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver, Inc., to prepare plans and specifications and provide construction support services for Jobs Nos. P1-44 and P2-53. The project includes seismic retrofit design for treatment plant structures and tanks, including soil stabilization at both Plants Nos. 1 and 2, and preparation of an emergency response plan. In August 1993, the Directors also approved Addendum No. 1 to this Professional Services Agreement, which provides for a reallocation of funds among categories of work but no change in the total fee. The original Scope of Work included five separate design and construction packages phased over a 24-month period. Design packages addressing Class 1 structures at Plant No. 2 are complete. Class 1 structures are considered critical to maintain facility operations and/or are critical to safety. The Class 1 seismic retrofit of designs was completed at Plant No. 2 first because Plant No. 2 is located directly upon the Newport/Inglewood Fault. The next design package was for Class 1 structures at Plant No. 1. Finally, Class 2 structures and soil stabilization at both plants were to be designed. The original estimated ultimate design and construction costs for this work is between $50-60 million. The original Scope of Work also required the preparation of an Emergency Response Plan that would provide a framework for coordinated, effective emergency management and response to a wide range of potential emergencies. These emergencies include earthquakes, fire, flood and hazardous spills. As the Emergency Response Plan began to develop, it became clear that new information required to be included in the Plan has exceeded the requirements detailed in the Scope of Work. Staff, in association with Holmes & Narver, determined that this Plan should be removed from the Scope of Work. This is proposed to be deleted for a credit under Addendum No. 2. The Emergency Response Plan will be prepared under a separate contract by others under primary direction of the Districts' Safety and Health Officer. The original Scope of Work required Holmes & Narver, Inc. to conduct a seismology/geologic investigation to evaluate the potential for surface faulting at Plant No. 2 during an earthquake associated with the Newport-Inglewood Fault, and to design corrective soil strengthening procedures accordingly. Some of this work is also recommended to be removed from the scope of work. The seismology geologic investigation fieldwork related to this task has been completed and the associated report has been submitted. Recommendations by the geotechnical subconsultant, Law/Crandall Inc. ("Report of Fault Rupture Hazard Investigation, Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 2, June 13, 1994"), state: "Faults identified as having high activity levels (active faults) have a greater risk of surface rupture during the life of the facility. There is no known seismic retrofitting method or other type of remedial measure that would provide a cost-effective means of mitigating surface rupture. Therefore, future Class 1 and Class 2 structures, or structures intended for human occupancy, should not be planned in areas where active faults have been identified. We recommend a 50-foot structural setback from active faults for all future development of the above-mentioned types of structures at the site. Also, if the risks related to potential service disruption or uncontrolled effluent releases are considered critical, relocation of these structures is the only feasible method of hazard mitigation." Under Job No. P2-53, Phase 1 studies performed by Dames and Moore (an engineering consultant), two demonstration projects were recently concluded to evaluate two different types of soil stabilization procedures that could potentially prevent liquefaction around existing critical structures. Both of these demonstration projects failed. Neither grout injection nor chemical soil stabilization produced adequate strengthening of the soil. Holmes and Narver then recommended a third demonstration project using a more aggressive compaction grouting method and prepared plans for a test at one primary clarifier. During review of this third demonstration project, staff considered the estimated cost of the full scale use of the method ($20 million), the disruption of plant operations, the likelihood and extent of earthquake damage even with the grouting in place and alternative means of mitigation. Staff concluded that the differential settlement of any structure is estimated to be no more than three inches and this can be somewhat mitigated by adding more flexibility to pipe connections in future pipe replacement projects and which, in any case, could be relatively easily corrected by compaction grouting after the event. In short, this proposed work is very expensive and there is no assurance that the Districts would receive any protection from damage caused by liquefaction and displacement occurring as a result of a large magnitude quake. Staff therefore concluded that the third soil stabilization demonstration project need not be pursued and directed Holmes and Narver not to proceed. To mitigate the possible damage that could occur during a major seismic event at Plant No. 2, the Law/Crandall report suggests that critical structures be relocated to an area outside the fault zone. For existing structures, this is impractical and very expensive because it would require the building of replacement facilities and-the demolition of existing structures. But the decisions on new structures will include best placement to reduce earthquake damage. The geotechnical consultant's study shows areas of anticipated high movement that should be avoided. i While proactively protecting all structures from all eventualities now appears impractical and, in fact, impossible, the 1989 Master Plan recommends the storage of vital repair equipment on-site, and that the Districts be ready to respond to a major seismic event. By having repair materials on-site and available for immediate use, the Districts would be able to repair existing equipment, pipelines and other critical items in a more timely manner to restore the integrity of the facility. Essential items could include pipe repair kits, sections of pipe, couplings, flanges, pumps, hoses and other items deemed necessary to get the plants back on-line. The above described work would require a change in scope with Holmes & Narver, Inc., to: (1) provide engineering services to inspect the existing facilities in the theoretical fault zone to determine the most probable damage that would be expected in a major seismic event, and means of repair that would be required; (2) provide engineering services to prepare plans and specifications to construct an earthquake resistant storage facility to house the strategic materials; (3) provide specifications for the purchase of the strategic materials (these items would be purchased separately by Districts' staff in accordance with the Districts' procurement procedures); and (4) provide additional construction support and assistance. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends authority to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Holmes and Narver, Inc. for planning, design and construction services relative to the Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No P144, and Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53, providing for changes to the original Scope of Work to delete preparation of the Emergency Response Plan and delete design services related to soil stability under structures, and to add design services to provide strategic positioning of emergency repair supplies and equipment, and associated construction support services, for an estimated net add of$190,000. Following the negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Committee and the Boards for further consideration. wpdccVdc9 l Ibinw.sr JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR November 9, 1994 Agenda Item 11 (b)(2): consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design, construction support services and preparation of operation andmaintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-43, providing for additional construction support services, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. Summary For more detailed information on the proposed addendum, please see the attached Staff Report dated November 2, 1994. Engineering and Construction Committee Recommendation The Committee recommends authorizing staff to negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P243. Upon completion of negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Committee for further consideration. wraaedGM11b21109.e4- 1- __•y COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS V AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1O Ewe AVENUE November 2, 1994 F.0.9 8127 MN AIN VMEY.MLI0 NIA W7MO127 914)9w3 11 STAFF REPORT Proposed Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Additional Construction Support Services re Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38. and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2.43 On June 12, 1991, the Boards awarded a Professional Services Agreement to John Carollo Engineers in the amount of$1,914,815 to provide engineering services for the design of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. 131-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P243. Both projects included over 100 relatively small miscellaneous improvements to various facilities throughout the two treatment plants. Three addenda have previously been authorized for this contract. Addendum No. 1 provided for a change in the wording for the errors and omissions insurance coverage with no change in the contract amount. Addendum No. 2 provided for a number of additional tasks deemed necessary that could most `! effectively be completed through this design contract. Addendum No. 2 added $76,750.00. Addendum No. 3 provided for additional design services to complete the seismic retrofit of nonstructural items at both treatment plants and to incorporate small scope changes to meet operational and aesthetic needs identified during the design phase. Addendum No. 3 added $527,600.00. The total amended contract amount is $2,519,165.00. In the Districts' original Request for Proposal, construction support services were requested providing for a minimum of 2500 hours. John Carollo Engineers submitted the minimum number of hours with their proposal for a total value of$211,936.80. The minimum hours requested in the proposal was set by Districts' staff. This budget is anticipated to be expended by late 1994, based on the billings for construction support received to date and the typical cost expended monthly. JCE provides construction support in direct response to requests by Districts' staff. These services typically include attendance at project meetings, review of contractor shop drawing submittals, response to requests for plan clarification, preparation of change-order technical materials and review of change-order costs. The level of services required for a project depends on the complexity of the project and the time for construction completion. The miscellaneous projects are complex because of the many independent items that are modified at each plant, involving a significant amount of equipment, piping, electrical and instrumentation work. These projects had higher quantities of mechanical, electrical and control systems than a project with large J amounts of concrete and foundation work, such as clarifiers or digesters. These miscellaneous projects require a higher amount of construction support services due to the variety of equipment and conditions that each portion of the projects entails. For each construction contract, a proportionately larger number of shop drawings are submitted for the numerous various components of all the systems as compared to a larger project with similar components. For example, the large secondary expansion project (with a construction value of$14,496,000) provides five types of pumps, while three miscellaneous construction projects (with a construction value of$11,434,000) will provide fourteen types of pumps, each with a separate set of shop drawings and performance data submittal, needing careful engineering review. In addition, each pump system (as with all constructed systems) requires testing and start-up for which consultant services are required. The design work for these miscellaneous projects is divided into five separate construction contracts (three of which have already been bid). JCE has been providing construction support since April 1993 when the first Miscellaneous Projects, Job No. P243-1, was awarded. Construction is anticipated to extend through February 1995 for projects presently in construction. Two additional projects have yet to be awarded for construction that are presently in design under this design contract. Each new construction contract will create additional demands for consultant time for attending construction meetings, reviewing shop drawings and responding to design questions. Additional construction services are also required due to the time extensions of the construction contracts. One contract is beyond the original contract period and the �... other two construction contracts are likely to extend beyond their contract period. The time extensions equate to more construction support required from the consultant. Staff has evaluated the need for additional construction support and start-up services and recommended that negotiations be authorized for Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P243, for an estimated additional amount of$72,000. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends authority to negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P-138, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P243. Upon completion of negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Committee for further consideration. 11 Q-nw.sr ,� JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING 4 u AGENDA FOR November 9, 1994 Agenda Item 11 (b)(3)(b): Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Engineering and Construction Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for additional design and software programming services for Rehabilitation of Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P141, and Rehabilitation of Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P248; and consideration of motion adopting Board Resolution 94-131, approving Addendum No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement, for additional services, on an hourly rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit for an additional amount not to exceed $67,198.00, Increasing the total authorized compensation from $482,210.00 to an amount not to exceed $549,408.00. Summary For more detailed information on the proposed changes, please see the attached Staff Report dated November 2, 1994. Engineering and Construction Committee Recommendation The Committee recommends consideration of a motion to receive, file and approve the Engineering and Construction Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation; and consideration of adopting a resolution approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement, for additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $67,198.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $482,210.00 to an amount not to exceed $549,408.00. wpdx%pdc9S11 b31109.94 -1- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 21 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA W lUBu ELLI6 AVENUE November 2, 1994 c0.80.812I MUIVIAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 82MS-8127 OIAI882R411 STAFF REPORT Proposed Additional Design Work re Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-41, and Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48 Summary In January 1994, the Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of$482,210 for preparation of plans and specifications for design and construction support services to rehabilitate all 17 of the Districts' circular primary clarifiers. Rehabilitation of existing facilities must be done periodically, and completed sequentially to ensure both the continued operation of existing facilities and ongoing compliance with all regulatory requirements of our wastewater management program. Similar previous work was accomplished on these basins prior to 1985. All of the circular clarifiers are covered by geodesic domes that collect foul air produced during primary treatment. The facilities have been very successful in containing these foul odors. However, since the domes were installed, corrosion of the dome supports, clarifier mechanisms and walkway structures has occurred due to the corrosive constituents entrained in the foul air. (The repair of the dome column supports is now underway in accordance with a negotiated settlement with the original installation contractor, Advanco Constructors.) This project (PI-41and P2-48) is to address the other corrosion-related problems as well as operational problems noted by the Districts' Operations and Maintenance staff over the past several years. In addition, upgrades to meet current hazardous location and electrical code requirements will be included and certain structural modifications will be made for seismic purposes. As the design for the rehabilitation of clarifiers progressed, several additional modifications and changes beyond the original Scope of Work were identified that staff believes will either automate the treatment process, provide operational flexibility, increase reliability or improve the safety to Operations and Maintenance staff. The recommended modifications to the original Scope of Work include: a) Replace existing pump control panels with new programmable logic controller(PLC) cabinets that will connect directly to the existing supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system data highway through a new fiber optic connection; A b) Provide automated scum removal systems for scum troughs which will be controlled from the local PLC and monitored by the SCADA system; c) Develop and document the programming required for operation of the clarifier equipment during the design to ensure that the system is configured to be consistent with the standard control strategy that is now being developed by CH2M Hill; and d) Equip each clarifier with a gas detection system that will measure the amount of hydrogen sulfide, oxygen and methane that may accumulate under the domes. To enhance the level of safety for Districts' staff, these detected gases will be displayed and alarmed at each clarifier entrance, and at the central computer station in the Operations Center that is staffed twenty-four hours a day. Partially offsetting this proposed increase in the Scope of Work is a proposed decrease relating to the design of foul air fans and scrubbers. The original Scope of Work included the possible addition of six new foul air scrubbers. We originally anticipated that it would be necessary to significantly increase the air withdrawal rates from under the domes to meet existing codes. After detailed review of all codes, requirements and alternatives, it has been found that if the clarifiers are rehabilitated using corrosion- resistant material, explosion-proof electrical equipment and adequate confined-space gas-monitoring equipment, then the quantity of contaminated air that must be removed and scrubbed need not be increased over the existing rates. By not increasing the air removal rate we will avoid $600,000/year in added power costs. The portion of the original engineering fee for the air handling design can now be utilized to offset a portion of the additional work discussed above. Staff has evaluated the need for additional design and programming services and recommends that Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for planning, design and construction services relative to Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P141, and Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48, provide for additional services to replace existing pump control panels with new PLCs; provide an automated scum removal system for scum troughs; develop and document programming for operation of clarifier equipment for consistency; equip clarifiers with gas detection system to measure gases under the domes; and delete the design of foul air fans and scrubbers, be recommended for approval to the Boards of Directors. Following is a cost summary for Addendum No. 1: 2 Item Add or(Deduct) 1. Replace Existing Pump Control Panels at Clarifiers $129,000 2. Provide standard clarifier control programming 19,000 3. Provide automated scum removal system for scum troughs 16,000 4. Delete Foul Air System modifications (96,802) Total proposed additional fee $ 67,198 The summary of the contract with the proposed change follows: Proposed Existing Proposed Revised Agreement Addendum Agreement Engineering Services (direct labor at hourly rates, plus overhead at 187%) not to exceed $440,053 $67,198 $507,251 Fixed Profit 42,157 0 42,147 Total Contract Amount Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, be approved, providing for additional engineering services, increasing the total authorized compensation $67,198, from $482,210 to an amount not to exceed $459,408. A certification letter is attached. i:WmdWen0�D141 N 10994.ar �.. 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA J P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 `�xee cW (714)962-2411 October 6, 1994 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation in Connection with Rehabilitation of Primary Cladfiers 3,4 and 5 at Plant No. 1,Job No.P1-41, and Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through 0 at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-48 In accordance with the Dishicts'procedures for selection of professional engineering services,the Engineering and Construction Committee has negotiated the following fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for Addendum No. 1 for additional design services and deletion of modifications to the foul air system in connection with Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers 3,4,and 5 at Plant No. 1,Job No.P1-41,and Rehabilitation of Primary Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No.2,Job No. P2-48,on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead and direct expenses,plus fixed profit,in an amount not to exceed$67,198 Existing Proposed Revised Agreement Addn.No.1 Agreement Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 187% and direct expenses, not to exceed $440,053 $67,198 $507,251 Fixed Profit 42.157 0 42,157 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $482.210 The Engineering and Construction Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. WJohn Collins /s/James Wahner John Collins,Chair James Wanner,Vice Chair Engineering and Construction Committee Engineering and Construction Committee /sBlake P.Anderson Blake P.Anderson Director of Engineering �a�s� RESOLUTION NO. 94-131 ... APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR ADDITIONAL STUDIES PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR JOB NOS. P1-41 AND P2-48 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR ADDITIONAL STUDIES, PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR REHABILITATION OF CLARIFIERS 3, 4 AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-41, AND REHABILITATION OF CLARIFIERS D THROUGH Q AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-48, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN AND SOFTWARE PROGRAMMING SERVICES .................................. WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Boyle �i Engineeering Corporation for additional studies, preparation of plans and specifications and construction support services for Rehabilitation of Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41, and Rehabilitation of Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend said agreement to provide for additional design and software programming services; and, WHEREAS, the Engineering and Construction Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said additional services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated November 9, 1994, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated January 12, 1994, by and between County �✓ Sanitation District No. 1 , acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Boyle Engineering Corporation for additional studies, preparation of plans and specifications and construction support services for Rehabilitation of Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41, and Rehabilitation of Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48, providing for additional design and software programming services, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $67,198.00,as follows, which increases the total authorized compensation from $482,210.00to an amount not to exceed $549,408.00: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addendum No. 1 Agreement Professional Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 187% and direct expenses, not to exceed $440,053 $67,198 $507,251 Fixed Profit 42,157 0 42,157 TOTAL, not to exceed $482,210 $67,198 $549,408 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 9, 1994. R4p IJ.t 31 t v JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR November 9, 1994 Agenda Item 11 (b)(4): Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-1, Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-1, Miscellaneous Improvement to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-384, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-3, authorizing an addition of$26,350.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc., Division of Zum Constructors, Inc., for four items of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $6,049,864.00 to an amount not to exceed $6,076,214.00. Summary For more detailed information on the proposed change order, please see the attached Staff Report dated November 2, 1994. Engineering and Construction Committee Recommendation The Committee recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-1, Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-1, Miscellaneous Improvement to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-384, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-3, authorizing an addition of$26,350.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc., Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc., for four items of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $6,049,864.00 to an amount not to exceed $6,076,214.00. wptlxW'M11be1109.94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS N ORANGE COUNTY. CAOFONNIA v 108a EUIS AV WE November 2, 1994 a0.BOX 8127 XOUN NVN Y.MUPOVX XWM4127 STAFF REPORT Proposed Change Order No. 2 to the Plans and Specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-1: Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-1: Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-4: and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-3 This project combines several jobs designed by both John Carollo Engineers and Districts' staff. Job No. P1-36-1, Electrification of Pump Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 1, provides for the removal of existing digester gas-driven engines that drive the pumps that transfer the primary effluent into the aeration basins for secondary treatment and replacement with electric motors. Job No. P1-38-1, Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, includes a new guard shack on North Perimeter Road, new fencing along the East and West Perimeter Roads, new landscaping, lighting and security improvements for protection inside the plant. Job No. P1-38-4, Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, provides for exterior improvements to existing painted maintenance buildings, installation of a high pressure instrument air system, replacement of the paging system at both plants, construction of an emulsion polymer facility, electrical improvements to the new laboratory and other miscellaneous improvements to Plant No. 1. Job No. P243-3, Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, includes interior improvements to existing painted process buildings, removal of existing digester gas compressor engine, replacement of existing boilers and other miscellaneous improvements to Plant No. 2. The construction contract was awarded in December, 1993 to Advanco Constructors. Change Order No. 2 adds four items of work to the contract. Job No. P1-36-1 Item 1, in the amount of$6,998.00, is for removal and replacement of a leaking deteriorated 42-inch butterfly valve within a confined space inside the primary effluent pump station at Reclamation Plant No. 1. A new valve was recently purchased by the Districts to rectify this problem. The Contractor was directed to furnish the labor and equipment to remove and replace the valve and operator. This work was not included in the original contract. Replacement of this valve was necessary in order to isolate plant flows into the Primary Effluent Pump Station (PEPS) wet well. The specifications W, required the Districts to isolate the wet well for the Contractor to perform other contract work (the replacement of the existing PEPS submersible pump.) Item 2, in the amount of$4,216.00. is for electrical additions and modifications to the organic chemistry instrumentation laboratory and organic chemistry sample preparation laboratory at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The work included: added electrical circuitry to serve new laboratory equipment, relocation of existing uninterruptible power source units in the laboratory electrical room to provide more working clearance required by electrical codes, due to the addition of a new electrical panel, furnishing and installing additional pull boxes in new and existing conduit runs to facilitate installation of new electrical conductors. The above modifications and additions were not included in the contract drawings and specifications because they were not known during the design phase. This additional work was added at the request of Districts' design staff in order for the Contractor to complete contract required work. Job No. J-17-2 was designed by District's staff. Job No. 132-43-3 Item 3, in the amount of$7,617.00, is for modifications to dome stairways and viewport platforms for six digesters at Treatment Plant No. 2. The modifications consisted of removing existing dome insulation and rerouting existing plant water piping on top of the domes which conflicted with the construction of new stairways and view platforms required by the contract. The existing dome insulation and plant water piping interferences were not shown on the contract drawings because they were overlooked �..� during the design phase. Item 4, in the amount of$7,519.00, is for additional costs associated with the overtime work performed on weekends to remove existing paint finishes on the interior of the Solids Loading and Conveyor Building at Plant No. 2. This weekend work was required due to our inability to shut down biosolids production during normal contract specified work hours. Biosolids are produced on a continual basis Monday through Friday and cannot be suspended due to a lack of permanent storage. Paint removal could not be done concurrently when the biosolids conveyors in the building were in operation due to safety and other reasons. It was necessary to completely coverall mechanical equipment to protect it from wet sandblasting paint removal operations. With the mechanical conveyor equipment covered, it cannot be operated, The contract specifications originally provided no restrictions as to when the Contractor could do the paint removal work in this building because it was presumed that biosolids production could be temporarily halted in order for the contractor to perform contract required paint removal work. The additional costs for this item includes the labor cost differential between regular work hours and overtime work hours as documented by both the Contractor and the Districts. These costs are only for work accomplished in the Solids Handling facility. (Districts' staff anticipate additional overtime costs in the Dewatering Building because of similar restrictions. Those costs will be included in a future change order.) Miscellaneous rehabilitation projects within the plants, including Job Nos. P1-36-1, P1-38-2, P1-384, J-17-2 and P243-3, cover a large variety of unrelated construction items located in many different areas of the plants. Due to the complexity of these projects, changes are often initiated after actual conditions encountered in the field, differ from those assumed, discovered or known in the design phase. Many of the above changes fall into this category. The changes described above would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. Item 2 is a result of staff design errors. Item 3 is for additional costs resulting from designer errors. Staff will seek reimbursement from the designer on item 3 for an appropriate portion of the costs added to the project that would not have otherwise occurred had the original contract drawings been correct. The original contract amount for this project was $6,059,364.00, The project is now approximately 40% complete. The net amount of change orders to date is $26,350.00, representing a net increase of 0.28% above the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for an addition of$26,350.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors. There is no time extension associated with this change order. �..✓ wpdoctydcBSU i b4nov.er Page 1 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ..d 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Advanco Constructors, C.O. No.: Two (2) Div. of Zum Constructors, Inc. Date: November 9. 1994 Job: Electrification of Pump Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-36-1: Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-1: Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-38-4 and J-17-2: and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-3: Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Amount of this Change Order(Add)(BeduGt) $26,350.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. JOB NO.P1-36-1 ITEM 1 - REPLACEMENT OF 42-INCH BUTTERFLY VALVE AT PLANT NO. 1 The Contractor was directed to remove an existing 42-inch butterfly valve and replace it with a new butterfly valve purchased by the Districts. The existing valve is in deteriorated condition and is located in the primary effluent diversion box at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The work included furnishing labor and equipment to remove and replace the valve in a hazardous confined space. This work was not included in the contract but replacement of the valve was necessary at this time in order to isolate plant flows into the Primary Effluent Pump Station (PEPS)wet well. The Contractor required the wet well to be isolated in order to complete replacement of the PEPS submersible pump, included in Contract No. P1-36-1. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH #3; FCO #16) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,998.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �. 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Advanco Constructors, C.O. No.: Two (2) Div. of Zum Constructors, Inc. Date: November 9. 1994 Job: Electrification of Pumo Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-1: Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-1: Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-4 and J-17-2: and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-3: Consultant: John Carollo Engineers JOB NO.J-17.2 ITEM 2-ELECTRICAL MODIFICATIONS TO LABORATORY AT PLANT NO. 1 The Contractor was directed to perform additional electrical work in Rooms 214 and 231 of the Laboratory. This work included the addition of two 18"x 18"x 4'pull boxes in Rooms 214 and 231 to facilitate the pulling of new conductors. New conductors required by the contract could not be pulled through existing flexible conduits without the addition of intermediate pull boxes. Existing uninterruptible power source(UPS) units 2 and 3 were relocated in order to expose four existing junction boxes hidden under the units and not shown on the contract drawings. The junction boxes were removed and conduit added with new wire pulled directly in to the relocated UPS units and the addition of new conduit and junction boxes to provide separate homerun circuits to existing work benches. This item of work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. (Reference:FCO#11,#12,#13) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,216.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days JOB NO.P2-43-3 ITEM 3-MODIFICATIONS TO DIGESTER STAIRS AND PLATFORMS AT PLANT NO.2 The Contractor was directed to modify the dome stairways and viewport platforms for Digesters C, F, P,O,S, and T at Treatment Plant No.2. The modifications consisted of removing existing dome insulation and rerouting existing plant water piping on top of the domes that conflicted with construction of the new stairways and view platforms. The existing dome insulation and plantwater piping interferences were not shown on the contract drawings. This hem of work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH#9 and 9a;FCO#15) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,617.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days` gad Page 3 of 5 ... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Advanco Constructors, C.O. No.: Two (2) Div. of Zum Constructors. Inc. Date: November 9, 1994 Job: Electrification of Pump Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-1: Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-1: Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-4 and J-17-2: and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-3: Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 4-REMOVAL OF PAINT AT SOLIDS HANDLING BUILDING PLANT NO.2-WEEKEND WORK The Contractor was directed to remove epsbng paint finishes on the interior of the solids loading and conveyor building at Treatment Plant No.2 beginning Friday and ending Sunday for a total of two weekends. Weekend work was required due to the inability of the Districts'operations department to shutdown biosolids production in this facility during the contract specified work hours,Monday through Thursday. Paint removal could not be performed concurrently with the mechanical conveyors in operation. The contract specifications provided no �j restrictions as to when the contractor would be allowed to perform the paint removal work in this building. Additional costs for weekend work resulted from the labor cost differential between regular work hours and overtime work hours as documented by the Contractor and reviewed by the Districts. This Rem of work was accomplished by Contractors force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b)of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO#7) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $7,519.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $26,350.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 4 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Advanco Constructors, C.O. No.: Two (2) Div. of Zum Constructors, Inc. Date: November 9, 1994 Job: Electrification of Pumo Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-1: Security and Landscaoino Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-1: Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-4 and J-17-2: and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-3: Consultant: John Carollo Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: January 6, 1994 Original Contract Time: 300 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 1, 1994 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $6,059,364.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ (9,500.00) This Change (Add) (Deduei) $ 26,350.00 Amended Contract Price $6,076,214.00 Page 5 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors, C.O. No.: Two (2) Div. of Zum Constructors, Inc. Date: November 9, 1994 Job: Electrification of Pump Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-1: Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-1: Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1 Job No. PI-3B-4 and J-17-2: and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-3: Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Board Authorization Date: November 9, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: _( ' / Recommended ed. bey: Date Engineering Manager Date Construction Manager A ppro d Approved daasQto Form:2t& / s zc �} ` � °1 f 24�f rector of Engineering to Gene4 Counsel Date Accepted by: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIV. OF ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC. q � u Contract r Da e JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDAFOR NOVEMBER 9, 1994 Agenda Item 11 (b)(5): Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.43-1, authorizing an addition of $25,000.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for one item of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $3,303,553.00 to an amount not to exceed $3,328,553.00. Summary For more detailed information on the proposed change order, please see the attached Staff Report dated November 3, 1994. Engineering and Construction Committee Recommendation The Committee recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 for an addition of $25,000.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. There is no time extension associated with this change order. L79511*51109.94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS November 3, 1994 W ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA 10Baa Fu6>vEFNIF PO AM 8127 MWMN V"EY.GLIEONM>W2 127 STAFF REPORT masaxll Proposed Chance Order No. 5 to the Plans and Specifications Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Imorovements to Facilities at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1 Job No. P2-43-1, Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, provides for construction of four chemical storage containment areas, addition of an anionic polymer storage and feed facility, installation of a new flow bypass gate at an existing effluent junction box, construction of a flowmeter test facility, replacement of demisting sections of existing air scrubbers, removal and replacement of asbestos-insulated steam piping, installation of new strainers at the plant water pump station, electrical modifications, and other miscellaneous work items. The design for this $3.4 million project was prepared by John Carollo Engineers from June 1991 to December 1992 and the construction contract was awarded in April 1993 to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, Change Order No. 4 is an addition, in the amount of$25,000.00, to the contract for one item of additional work. Item 1, in the amount of$25,000.00, is for upgrading two 12,000 volt switchgear blank spare spaces specified in the original contract documents to equipped spare spaces. "Equipped" spare spaces will provide all necessary wiring and mechanical provisions to allow for addition of electrical equipment in the future. Staff recommends this change because the resultant use of factory installations of wiring, terminal blocks, thermostats, and fuses will be of a higher quality and more economical than would otherwise occur in subsequent field installations. This is an elective change in the scope of the project. The original contract amount for this project was $3,398,000.00. The net deduction amount of change orders to date is $(69,447.00) representing a net decrease of 2.04% below the original contract amount. This contract is approximately 86% complete. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 for an addition of $25,000.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. There is no time extension associated with this change order. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 for an addition of $25,000.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. There is no time extension associated with this change order. wpCs*&MI1D5-mm Page 1 of 3 ..� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108"ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 9. 1994 Job: Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Imorovements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Amount of this Change Order (Add)(9eduet)$ 25,000.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - CENTRAL POWER GENERATION STATION SWITCHGEAR MODIFICATIONS This item is to convert two blank spaces in the 12,000 volt switchgear located in the Central Power Generation Facility to "fully equipped spaces." Equipped spaces include ..: all necessary wiring and mechanical provisions to allow for the addition of future electrical components in order to minimize future field work. This item includes the following provisions in Cubicle Numbers 1 and 26: A. Terminal blocks in the low voltage compartment. B. Pullout fuse blocks in the low voltage compartment. C. Ground termination terminals in the low voltage compartment. D. Current transformer shorting terminal blocks in the low voltage compartment. E. Space heaters thermostat and fuses in the low voltage compartment. F. Prewiring for current transformer secondary wiring for six current transformers in the medium voltage compartment. G. Prewiring for mechanism operated cell switches in the medium voltage compartment. H. Prewiring space heaters in the medium voltage compartment. I. Precut and prewire all control, protection, and instrumentation circuits in the low voltage compartment doors. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P2431-038) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $25,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $25,000.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY " 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 9,1994 Job: Priority Proiects Element of Miscellaneous Imorovements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-43-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: May 11, 1993 Original Contract Time: 420 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: July 4, 1994 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 420 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 3,398,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ (94,447.00) This Change (Add)(PeduGt) $ 25,000.00 Amended Contract Price $ 3,328,553.00 Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: Four (4) Date: November 9,1994 Job: Priority Proiects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Board Authorization Date: November 9, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by / Renommended by: iA(f•fC�2' �//6/ / �� - <� /Esc 9,4- ngineering Manager Construction Manager Date Appra+� y Approved as to grin: zd P �(z6 irector of Engineering Datb General aoGnsel Date Accepted by: PASCAL & LUDWIG ENGINEERS s&-e S Co ractor Date 'y JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 9, 1994 Agenda Item 11 (b)(6): Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, authorizing an addition of $22,039.00 to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for three items of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $14,319,852.00 to an amount not to exceed $14,341,891.00. Summary For more detailed information on the proposed change order, please see the attached ./ Staff Report dated November 3, 1994. Enaineerina and Construction Committee Recommendation The Committee recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for said project for an addition of$22,039.00 to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. vmd= x1 95\11 b91109.94 COUNTY SANITATION Dimas d ORANGE COUNIX CAUrOGNIA 1® E AV WE November 3, 1994 PO WX8127 F NN V< Y.CgllWpN>B MZI 27 STAFF REPORT Proposed Change Order No. 5 to the Plans and Specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-2 Job No. P2-42-2 is a $14.5 million contract to expand the secondary treatment capacity at Plant No. 2 by lengthening the clarifiers and installing other improvements. This project will increase the secondary capacity from 75 million gallons per day (mgd) to 90 mgd. The plans and specifications were prepared by John Carollo Engineers in 1990 and the construction contract was awarded in April 1993 to Margate Construction, Inc. This contract is approximately 65% complete. Item 1, in the amount of $10,138.00, moves the location of new electrical equipment in order to avoid an electrical code violation and to increase accessibility to the equipment for maintenance and future use. Several new Motor Control Center (MCC) sections are to be installed into an existing electrical room according to the contract documents. This room is congested with electrical equipment and, with the addition of the new equipment, this room would become \...� confining for Maintenance staff servicing the equipment. In addition, one of the MCC sections was relocated into an adjacent room to provide the required emergency escape access as required by the National Electrical Code, which was not possible in the existing electrical room. Two other pieces of related equipment were also relocated under this item. The three MCC sections are interlinked with wiring which made the relocation of all three sections cost effective and produced a more uniform installation. Item 2, for $11,098.00, adds stainless steel safety bars to the openings where the effluent troughs of the new clarifiers drain into the effluent channel. These bars will prevent the potential safety hazard of personnel being swept into the covered effluent channel should they accidentally slip or fall into the effluent troughs, These bars were not included in the contract documents. Item 3, in the amount of $803.00, provides for modifications required to fit the existing cable tray into the new mechanical configuration. The contract documents require the contractor to remove existing 24-inch cable tray from a portion of Tremblay Tunnel prior to demolition of the tunnel. This existing tray is shown to be reinstalled without modification after the tunnel has been reconstructed into the new DAF "D" Gallery. The existing tray, however, cannot fit back into its original position due to mechanical and structural interferences. A \,,,i simple solution was to add adjustable hinges in several places to fit the tray around obstructions. This change order item provides for the labor and materials to add the described hinges. lam/ Items 1 and 2 are design changes initiated by Districts' staff in order to improve personnel safety and accessibility to new equipment. Item 3 results from an electrical/mechanical utility interference on the plans. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date will be a credit of $154,109.00 and an additional 239 calendar days. This represents a decrease of 1.07% from the original contract amount. The contract provides for assessment of liquidated damages in the amount of $750.00 per day. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for an addition of$22,039.00 to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. wpd=*d, S11 br nw.sr Page 1 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: November 9, 1994 Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-2 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Amount this Change Order (Add)(Beduet) $ 22,039.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - CHANGE LOCATION OF MCC INSTALLATION The contractor was directed to install the new DAF thickener motor control center(MCC) sections in a different location than shown on the contract drawings in order to prevent a possible safety code violation, and to provide the Districts' Maintenance staff with improved access to the equipment. The MCC Sections in question were shown on the plans to be installed in the DAF Electrical Room. This room is congested with electrical equipment, and with the addition of the new equipment, this room would become confining for Maintenance staff servicing the equipment. In addition, an NEC regulation (Article 110-16(c)) states that electrical equipment in excess of 1200 Amps and 6 feet wide must have emergency escape access at each end of the equipment,which is not possible with the configuration of this room. The NEC regulation affected MCC-THB, and it was relocated into an adjacent room to provide the access. Related equipment, was also relocated to reduce costs and to provide a more uniform installation. Costs associated with this change order item include the net additional costs for labor and materials for the revised installation plus additional labor and equipment to move the MCC Sections to the new location. This change order item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions (Reference PCH-010). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $10,138.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Page 2 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: November 9. 1994 Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-2 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 2 - ADDED SAFETY BARS TO EFFLUENT TROUGH/CHANNEL OPENINGS The Contractor was directed to add stainless steel safety bars to the openings where the effluent troughs of the new clarifiers drain into the effluent channel. Staff determined that each of the 56" openings required two 1-inch diameter stainless steel bars with attachment brackets on each end. These bars will prevent personnel from being swept into the covered effluent channel should they accidently slip or fall into the effluent troughs. The effluent troughs are uncovered and contain algae and swiftly moving water. If a person were to slip, fall or step into this trough, the current could easily carry this person down into the effluent channel to certain death. The trough/channel openings were noticed by the design consultant and staff during construction to be a potential safety risk. The bars are constructed of a corrosive resistent metal and will allow for normal water Bow while preventing someone from being washed to the outfall. This change order item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(A) of the General Provisions (Reference PCH-015). `..✓ ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $11.098.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3- CABLE TRAY MODIFICATION IN DAF GALLERY Modifications were required in order to fit the existing cable tray into the new mechanical configuration. The contract documents require the Contractor to remove the existing 24-inch cable tray from a portion of Tremblay Tunnel prior to demolition of the tunnel. This existing tray is shown to be reinstalled without modification after the tunnel has been reconstructed into the DAF"D" Gallery. The existing tray, however, cannot fit back into its original position due to the mechanical and structural interferences. A simple solution was found to cut the tray at several places and add adjustable hinges in order to fit the tray around obstructions. This change order item provides for the labor and materials to add the described hinges. The work was performed on a force account basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2(B) of the General Provisions (Reference FCO 8). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $803.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $22,039.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days Page 3 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Five (5) Date: November 9. 1994 Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2412-2 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: June 2, 1993 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: June 1, 1995 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 239 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 969 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: January 26, 1996 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 14,496,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ (176,148.00) This Change(Add) (Beduet) $ 22,039.00 Amended Contract Price $ 14,341,891.00 Page 4 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 `..� FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Matgata Cnnstr rtion, Inc C.O. No.: Five 151 Date: Nnvemher 9, 1996 Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant Nn. 9, .Inh Nn P7-49-7 Consultant: .Inhn r:arnlln Fng'neers Board Authorization Date: November 9, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Recommended by: Engineering Manager Date C nstruction Manager Date Ap o Approv s Mi L? Director of Engineering Date General C unsel Date Accepted by: MMAARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Lt6nftiactor Date JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 9, 1994 Agenda Item 11 (b)(7): Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.23-5-1(Rebid No. 2), authorizing a net addition of $38,854.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. for three items of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $2,321,798.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,360,652.00, and granting a time extension of 19 calendar days for completion of said additional work. Summary For more detailed information on the proposed change order, please see the attached Staff Report dated November 3, 1994. Engineering and Construction Committee Recommendation The Committee recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 for a net addition of $38,854.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. There is a 19-calendar day time extension associated with the change order. wpdoclpdc95V 1 b711 N.94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA ICSAA ELLS AVENUE November 3, 1994 R.o,WX e127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAM ORNIA 9272E-8127 MOVU-2AT1 STAFF REPORT Proposed Chance Order No. 4 to Operations Center Expansion at Plant No, 2. Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2), Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2 designed by Brown & Caldwell Engineers, is being constructed by Javaid Contractors, Inc. The current project includes the addition of 8,500 square feet of basement and first floor facilities, the remodeling of 1,800 square feet of the existing building, and a 4,500 square foot enclosed electric cart parking/charging area. The work includes new locker facilities, offices, elevator and general upgrades to the existing building built in 1977 at a cost of$2.3 million. The original contract completion date was February 27, 1994; with approval of this change order, the revised completion date is April 23, 1994. This project is approximately 90% complete and the anticipated completion date is December 2, 1994. This change order consists of three items of additional work and provides a net addition of$38,854.00 to the contract and a 19 calendar day time extension. Item No. 1, in the amount of$20,816.00 is for the labor and material necessary to reroute the electrical service conduits within the existing Operation Center Building and the expansion portion of the building. The route called for per the contract documents is unattainable due to conflicts with other utilities within the raised ceiling area. These conflicts are present because there was inadequate space to install all of the piping, duct work, and electrical conduits in the ceiling area as specified on the contract drawings. Staff determined that the most cost-effective solution was to relocate the electrical conduits. Item No. 2, in the amount of$17,053.00 is for the removal of approximately 250 cubic yards of unsuitable soil from along the north and east sides of the new parking lot and replace it with suitable soil. This item also includes costs to remove and replace curb and gutter forms that were installed by the contractor prior to the discovery of the unsuitable soil. The unsuitable soil was unforeseen because it was localized in an area where no boring information was available and was required to be removed to obtain the specified compaction in the area. Item No. 3, in the amount of$983.00, is for the difference in material costs for providing thicker insulation than specified for the roof of the Cart Parking Garage and entry foyer. m The specified thickness would not provide adequate support at the rib spans. This was a design error and the Districts will seek the appropriate reimbursement from the Designer. Items 1 and 3 are design errors and the Districts will seek appropriate Designer reimbursement. Item 2 was an unforeseen soils condition which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. If the Districts approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $75,788.00 with a 55 calendar day time extension. Liquidated damages for this contract are $500.00 per day. The total cost of change orders to date represent an increase of 3.32% over the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 for a net addition of$38,854.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. There Is a 19-calendar day time extension associated with the change order. wpdx1p&95U 1 b7-nw.sr -2- Page 1 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor. Javaid Contractors, Inc. C. 0. No.: Four (4) Date: November 9. 1994 Job: Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) Consultant: Brown & Caldwell Engineers Amount of this Change Order (Add)(OeduGt) $ 38,854.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - REROUTE ELECTRICAL SERVICE CONDUITS This item is for the labor and equipment required to reroute the electrical service conduits within the existing Operations Center Building and the expansion portion of the building. The revised route recommendation by the design consultants consists of core drilling the concrete deck, installation of electrical conduit and fittings, furring out of walls to conceal the conduit, drywall, and paint. The route called for on the contract documents is unattainable due to conflicts with other utilities within the raised ceiling area. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)(1) of the General Provisions (Reference: Javaid PCO #59 ; FCO#14 ). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $20,818.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 19 CALENDAR DAYS ITEM 2 - REMOVAL OF UNSUITABLE SOIL This item involves the costs for labor and equipment required to excavate approximately 250 cubic yards of unsuitable soil, from along the north and east sides of the new parking lot, and to replace with suitable soil. Also included in this item are the costs to remove curb forms and reinstall after replacment of soil. The unsuitable soil was not identified on the plans to be removed and it will not compact to the required density. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Seciton 10-6(B) of the General Provisions (Reference: Javaid PCO#56 ; FCO# 9A,10, and 12). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $17,053.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 CALENDAR DAYS Page 2 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Javaid Contractors, Inc. C. 0. No.: Four (4) Date: November 9, 1994 Job: Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) Consultant: Brown & Caldwell Engineers ITEM 3 - INCREASE THICKNESS OF ROOF INSULATION FOR CART PARKING GARAGE AND ENTRY FOYER This item is for the cost to increase the thickness of the roof insulation for the cart parking garage and entry foyer. This specified 1-inch thick insulation would not provide adequate support at the rib spans. This item was negotiated with the contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(B)l of the General Provisions (Reference: Javaid PCO#40, FCO#11) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $983.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 CALENDAR DAYS TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $38,854.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 19 CALENDAR DAYS Page 3 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .. 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Javaid Contractors, Inc. C. 0. No.: Four (4) Date: November 9. 1994 Job: Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) Consultant: Brown & Caldwell Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 19 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order, SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: February 27, 1993 Original Contract Time: 365 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: February 27 ,1994 Time Extension this C.O.: 19 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 55 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 420 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: April 23, 1994 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 2,284,864.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 36,934.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 38,854.00 Amended Contract Price $ 2,360,652.00 Page 4 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Javaid Contractors, Inc. C. 0. No.: Four (4) Date: November 9, 1994 Job: Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) Consultant: Brown & Caldwell Engineers Board Authorization Date: November 9, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Recommended by: 4 �o 7/ gineering Manager Date construction Manager Date Appro Approved asto Form: �,� 17 5Yf L l�X/� irector of En ineering Date General C6unsel Date Accepted by: JAVAID CO TRACTORS, IN . /rIN 9 Contra' or d bate JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA November 9, 1994 Agenda Item (12): Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report prepared by staff and KPMG Peat Marwick, Certified Public Accountants,for the year ending June 30, 1994. Summary See attached Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, Fiscal Year 1993-94. Recommendation: The Finance and Personnel Committee recommends that the Joint Boards receive, file and approve the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the year ending June 30, 1994. }.W/p�,1FlMgUNEURIRW RPR11Npd1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT f Fiscal Year 1993-94 P�\oao\slRicrs oFo9q 5� �G o c o a A9o�cr�NG THE EN`�\P�a�� r r r r r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1994 r r r r r r r r Prepared By: Department of Finance Accounting Division r Michael D. White Controller r r U U U u u (YQY YAM zmT IBlB malu'LLY BLA UC) U u u u u u . u L' U U U U COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Comprehensive Annual Financial Report r Table of Contents r For the Year Ended June 30, 1994 PASS r INTRODUCTORY SECTION: Letter of Transmittal. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i Board of Directors. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii re Organization Chart. . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. x Map of Service Area. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . xi FINANCIAL SECTION: Independent Auditors' Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Combined Financial Statements: Combined Balance Sheets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-5 r Combined Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Combined Statements of Cash Flows. . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-6 Notes to Financial Statements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 9-32 Combining Financial Statements: . . Combining Balance Sheet. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34-35 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36-37 Combining Statement of Cash Flows. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38-39 r, STATISTICAL SECTION: Expenses by Type - Last Ten Fiscal Years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Revenues and Contributed Capital by Source - Last Ten Fiscal Years. . . 42 Property Tax Levies and Collections - Last Ten Fiscal Years. . . . . . . . . . 43 Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property - La9t Ten Fiscal Years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 Property Tax Rates - Direct and Overlapping Governments - r Last Ten Fiscal Years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 45 Principal Users. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 Ratio of Annual Debt Service - Last Ten Fiscal Years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt.. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Bond Coverage - Last Ten Fiscal Years. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 Demographic Statistics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Property Values, Construction and Bank Deposit& - `° Last Ten Fiscal Years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Estimated Populations of Cities and Unincorporated Areas Bernd by The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 .. Insurance in Force. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Volume of wastewater Treated - Last Ten Fiscal Years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 Biosolids Produced - Last Ten Fiscal Years. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 55 Miscellaneous Statistics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 r L U u u u u u u u u u u u u u L' U u .1 r J Introductory Section Fiscal Year 1993-94 `F c 0 .� U Ol N O V 3 O L }7 C COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �t OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA y i P.O. BOX 9121.FOUNTAIN ALLEY.CALIFORNIACALIFORNIA 8212&8127 108d4 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNI 82709-7018 s1'aoe cW'� (714)962-2411 r September 22, 1994 r Honorable Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts r of Orange County Submitted herewith is the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the County y Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994. This report includes all of the individual District funds and was prepared by the Accounting Division of the Districts' Finance Department. Responsibility of both the accuracy of the data, and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the Districts. To the beet of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data are y accurate in all material respects and are reported in a manner designed to present fairly the financial position and results of operation$ of the Districts. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain an r understanding of the Districts' financial activities have been included. The report presented herewith consists of three parts: (1) an introductory section consisting of a letter of transmittal, a list of principal officials, r a Districts' organization chart, and a map of the individual Districts; (2) a financial section consisting of the independent auditors' opinion, general purpose financial statements, and combining statements of the individual r, District Enterprise Funds; and (3) a statistical section consisting of pertinent financial and nonfinancial data that presents historical trends and other information about the Districts. Included within the accompanying financial statements are all of the organizations, activities, and functions controlled by the Districts' Boards of Directors in accordance with the Governmental Accounting Standards Board r Statement Number 14, "The Financial Reporting Entity" . For the purpose of this evaluation, control was determined by the Boards' responsibility for: (1) adoption of the budgets and user charges, (2) taxing authority, and (3) y establishment of policies. The reporting entity and its services are described in further detail in Note 1 of the financial statements. r GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE The County Sanitation Districts of orange County, incorporated in 1954, y encompasses the Northern section of Orange County. The Districts provide wastewater treatment for an area of the County covering 470 square miles and y 1 L i Ir serving a population of 2,240,675, or approximately 92% of the County's population. The Districts are made up of nine separate public corporations. Each District is governed by a representative from each city and sanitary district within the District, and a member of the Orange County Board of Directors. Each ! - District has its own budget. All Districts, except Districts 13 and 14 V receive their own share of the 14 ad valorem property tax levy and have their own trunk sewer systems. District No. 13 buys capacity in the other Districts' facilities while District No. 14 owns a portion of the transmission L facilities together with the other Districts. The purpose of the Districts' wastewater management program is to protect the L public's health, preserve the beneficial uses of the coastal waters, and maintain air quality. The objectives of operating the treatment plants are to process and dispose of the treated wastewater and the separated solids in I accordance with Federal, state, and local laws including the Environmental L Protection Agency. The Districts sewerage system includes approximately 825 miles of sewers that L convey wastewater generated within the Districts' boundaries to the Districts' two wastewater treatment plants, Reclamation Plant No. 1 located in the City of Fountain Valley, and Treatment Plant No. 2 located in the City of Huntington Beach. Iwl Reclamation Plant No. 1 has a primary treatment capacity of 108 million I gallons per day (mgd) . Treatment Plant No. 2's designed primary treatment L capacity is 186 mgd. Approximately 50% (150 mgd) of the advanced primary effluent also receives secondary treatment. Both plants are master-planned for a future primary and secondary treatment capacity of 240 mgd for a L combined total of 480 mgd. Outflows of treated wastewater from the two plants are combined, disinfected, and discharged to the ocean off the Huntington Beach coast through an outfall L pipe that is 120 inches in diameter and approximately five miles long. The last mile of the outfall pipe is a diffuser that dilutes the wastewater with L seawater in a ratio of 148 parts seawater to one part treated wastewater at an average depth of 185 feet. BCONONIC COHDITIONS AND OUTLOOK u Like most local governments within the State of California, the District$ I continue to be impacted by the economic recession. This impact has been moat I.I strongly felt through the State'$ permanent anaval diversion of $3.5 million of property tax revenues from the Districts that began in 1992-93. Because of the continuing financial problems of member agencies, the Districts again Yr declined to raise sewer use service fees and connection fees for 1994-95 even though the costs of complying with stricter environmental and public health standards have continued to rise. However, even with the loss of property tax revenues and the decision not to increase user fees to match increasing L'L operating costs, the Districts still manage to maintain prudent reserve levels totaling $430 million, over four times the amount of 1993-94 expenses. L MAJOR INITIATIVES m.rrent Activities During calendar 1993, the $75 million Central Generation Facility Project was completed. In June and August of 1993, the central generation engines were .. placed into service at Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2, respectively. These engines, powered by digester gas produced from treated solids, generate electricity used to operate both plants with any excess power being sold to Southern California Edison. When fully operational, the project is expected to save the taxpayers of Orange County approximately $9 million annually. In January 1994, the Districts began utilizing reclaimed water from the Orange County Water District for the cooling of the central generation engines at Treatment Plant No. 2. An average of 36.4 million gallons of reclaimed water .., per month was need from January through June of 1994 saving approximately 230 million gallons of potable water. Due to the possibility that chlorine would be banned in metropolitan areas by r the and of the centu ry, the Districts began to study the use of hydrogen peroxide as an alternative for controlling trunk sewer odor. After a five week period, the study concluded that hydrogen peroxide was proven to be �+ effective in controlling odors and is safer and more economical than using _ chlorine. The use of hydrogen peroxide will allow for the decrease in insurance premiums and in chlorinator maintenance costa, and will negate the ve need to develop a hazardous chemical plan. In October 1993, the Districts replaced chlorine with hydrogen peroxide for trunk sewer odor control at Treatment Plant No. 2. After receiving a 78% increase in chlorine bids, the use of hydrogen peroxide also replaced chlorine at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Because of the cost difference between hydrogen peroxide and chlorine, the _ . Districts are projecting a savings of $600,000 to $700,000 a year in the cost of chemicals alone. ed During 1993-94, the Districts recycled 100% of the belt press dewatered biosolids from Reclamation Plant No. 1 for use as soil amendments. Because of the historical difficulty of disposing of this material and the tenuous nature of disposal alternatives, the Districts' Boards of Directors have adopted a polity of practicing multiple disposal options. Accordingly, the Districts have entered into contracts with several firms for biosolids disposal and reuse under varying terms. r Future Activities The expansion of the Oxygen-Activated Sludge Plant, located at Treatment Plant No. 2, is expected to be completed in 1994-95 at a total cost of $18 million. r The expansion of this facility will increase the capacity of the plant from 75 - mgd to 90 mgd. 111 L V SERVICE EFFORTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS In October of 1993, the Districts received the 1993 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) First Place Award for Operations and Maintenance Excellence for Large Secondary Treatment Facilities. In addition, the Districts received the 1993-94 EPA Region IX Operations and Maintenance Excellence First Place Award for Large Secondary Treatment Facilities for the Districts' innovative and cost effective wastewater management program. In 1993-94, the Districts also received a Gold Award from the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies `y for the Districts' ocean discharge permit 1004 compliance record. Further, the Districts' Reclamation Plant No. 1 was named -Plant of the Year- by the Santa Ana River Basin Section and the California Water Pollution Control Association. ACCOHNTINO AND BUDGETARY CONTROLS YJ The Districts' accounting records are maintained on the accrual basis for all funds. In developing and evaluating the Districts' accounting system, La consideration is given to the adequacy of internal accounting controls. Internal accounting controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance regarding: (1) the safeguarding of assets against lose I . from unauthorized use or disposition; and (2) the reliability of financial ~ records for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the V evaluation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. We believe that the Districts' internal accounting controls I � adequately safeguard assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper J recording of financial transactions. Although not required by statute, the Districts' Board of Directors adopts an i annual operating plan. Joint works' budgets are first prepared that identify LW the specific capital projects and operating activities to be undertaken by the Districts during the year. Upon adoption, Districts' staff allocates the i , joint works' budgets proportionately to each of the individual Districts and L obtains individual District budget approval. The budgetary level of control, the level at which expenses cannot exceed budget, is exercised at the District, or fund level. All of the Districts have adopted a Uniform L., Purchasing Policy that identifies the agreed upon purchasing standards. f ENTERPRISE OPERATIONS r Enterprise funds are used to account for the operations of the Districts, which are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business J enterprises. This allows the Districts to determine that the costs (expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of providing wastewater management services on a continuing basis are financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Sewer service user fees are evaluated annually based primarily on budget requirements for total operation, maintenance and capital expenditures in providing wastewater management services. Comparative data j Iv I , y covering the Districts enterprise operations over the past two fiscal years is as follows; r Amount Percent - of Increase of Increase Revenue[ 1993 .n 1992 .0 (Deereeoel (neereewel Operating revenues $71,447,918 $70,025,110 $1,422,808 2.03% r Operating expenses 84.268.142 82.045.790 2.222.352 2.71T ,.. Operating - income (loss) (12,820,224) (12,020,680) (799,544) 6.655 Non-operating income, net 47.127.910 41,077,140 4.050.570 9.40%. w Net income 634.307.686 911�056,660 3.251.026 10.4719 Both operating revenues and expenses increased approximately two to three °d percent which is a reflection of the increasing coat of operations that is -- comparable with the increase in the consumer price index over the same period of time. The 9.4 percent increase in net non-operating income is primarily 'r attributable to the increases in interest earnings and property tax revenues of $5.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively. Interest earnings have increased as a result of (1) the higher cash and investment balances which in m total grew by $116 million and consisted primarily of the debt proceeds generated from the $50 million Taxable Commercial Paper (TCP) Program and; (2) as a result of the additional interest earnings generated from the implementation of the $100 million Reverse Repurchase Agreement (REPO) Program. The Districts' TCP Program allows the Districts to use the TCP debt proceeds r to assist in funding current expenditures while District reserves remain within the County of Orange's Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) earning approximately two percent more than the interest expense on the TCP debt. The Districts' REPO program enables the Districts' to earn legal arbitrage by borrowing against purchased U.S. Securities and reinvesting the proceeds within LAIF earning interest at a rate that exceeds the interest rate paid on the borrowed funds by approximately two percent. DEBT ADMINISTRATION d At June 30, 1994, the Districts had a number of debt issues outstanding. These issues, net of applicable unamortized discounts, included $427 million r of certificates of participation, $50 million of taxable commercial paper, and $75,000 of general obligation bonds. The Districts have maintained their AA- rating from Standard and Poor's Corporation and As rating from Moody's Investor Services. r v r 4 v i In September of 1993, the Districts issued $46 million of refunding certificates of participation to refund $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92 Series B Certificates of Participation. Although the Districts recognized an accounting loss of $6 million in 1993-94, they were able to reduce their aggregate debt service payments by ! approximately $2.6 million over the next 22 years and obtained an economic 66 gain (the difference between the present values of the old and new debt service payments) of approximately $3.6 million. V In January of 1994, the Districts issued $50 million of taxable commercial paper to assist in the financing of current expenditures. This practice allowed the Districts' to maximize the amount of reserves invested with the County of Orange Local Agency Investment Fund which provided a higher interest rate yield than that required to be paid out in debt service interest payments. V CASH MANAO81HtN'l V During the past year, available cash was primarily in the County of Orange's Pooled Investment Fund. The yield on maturing investments averaged 7.74% during 1993-94, compared to the prior year average of 8.651;_ Interest earnings for the year were $33,226,000, while earnings in the prior fiscal year were $27,569,ODO, an increase of $5,657,000. As previously mentioned, this increase is a result of larger cash balances available for investment in addition to the legal arbitrage interest earnings from the Districts' $100 �+ million Reverse Repurchase Agreement Program. RISK MAHAOIDIENNT 1 For the year ended June 30, 1994, the Districts were self-insured for workers' compensation, property damage and general liability. The self-insured portion for worker's compensation is $250,000 per person per occurrence with outside V excess insurance coverage to $5 million. The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other perils is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $35 million for flood and LI $200 million for fire and other perils. The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquake is $250,000 or 5% per unit of insurance, which ever is greater, with outside insurance coverage to $35 million. The Districts also maintain outside comprehensive boiler and machinery insurance with a $100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to $100,000. The Districts are completely self-insured for general liability II coverage. 4 As of February 1, 1994, the Districts obtained outside insurance coverage for group medical claims and are no longer self-insured. Districts' management believes that there are no outstanding claims as of June 30, 1994 that would materially affect the financial position of the Districts. u A �.I r INDEPENDENT AUDIT d An audit of the books, financial records and transactions of the Districts is conducted annually by independent certified public accountants. The Districts - selected the accounting firm of RPMG Peat Marwick LLP to perform the audit for the years ended June 30, 1994 and 1993. Since the Districts did not receive any Federal Financial Assistance for the years ended June 30, 1994 and 1993, no Single Audit Report meeting the requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984 and related OMB Circular A-128 was required. The auditors' report On the r Districts' combined financial statements and combining statements is included in the financial section of this report. r CERTIPIGTS OF ACHIEVEMENT FOR EXCELLENCE IN FINANCIAL REPORTING The Government Finance Officers' Association of the United Staten and Canada (GFOA) awards a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to those governmental agencies who submit for the certificate and d have prepared a comprehensive annual financial report deemed worthy of the award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a governmental unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual - financial report, whose contents conform to program standards. Such reports must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable �+ legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. we ,r believe our current report conforms to the Certificate of Achievement Program requirements and are submitting it to GFOA to determine its eligibility for the award. ,r _ ACRNONLEDGMERTE ad Preparation of this report could not have been accomplished without the dedicated services of the Accounting Division staff, and I would like to express my appreciation to all members of the Division who assisted in its preparation. I would also like to thank the Districts' Boards Of Directors, the General Manager, and the Director of Finance for their interest and - support in conducting the financial operations of the Districts in a responsible and progressive manner. r Respectfully submitted, e wy/A r Michael D. White, CPA - Controller r vii u ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Board of Directors As of June 30, 1994 iJ AE26CE Active Director Diatz:WA Alteraete Diroeter V Cities: Anaheim Iry Pickles 2, 3 & 13 Tom Daly- Brea Carrey J. Nelson 2 Glenn Parker• Burnie Dunlap 3 Carrey J. Nelson V Glenn Parker• 13 Burnie Dunlap Buena Park Don R. Griffin 3 Donald Rone• Cypress Richard Partin- 3 Joyce C. Nicholson 64 Fountain Valley John Collins- 2 & 3 George Scott Fullerton A.B. "Buck" 2 & 3 Chris Norby Catlin• 4 Huntington Beach Linda Moulton- 3 Earle Robitaille Patterson- Victor Leipzig 11 Linda Moulton- ~ Patterson- Grace H. Winchell 11 Earle Robitaille 4 Irvine Barry Hammond 7 & 14 Mike Ward- La Habra William D. Mahoney 2 James H. Flora James H. Flora 3 William D. Mahoney V La Palma Wally Linn• 3 Eva G. Miner LOS Alamitos Charles E. Sylvia 3 Anthony Selvaggi• Newport Beach Phil Sansone 5 Jan Debay John C. Cox, Jr. 5 Jan Debay Evelyn Hart 6 John C. Cox, Jr. Jan Debay 7 Phil Sansone Orange Fred Herrera 1,2,7,13 & Gene Beyer* V 14 Placentia Norman Z. 2 Michael Maertrweiler Eckenrode• Ym Santa Ana Pat McGuigan 1 Thomas E. Lutz Miguel Pulido 2 Thomas E. Lutz Thomas E. Lutz 3 Pat McGuigan Ted R. Moreno 7 Miguel Pulido Seal Beach George Brown* 3 Frank Laszlo Stanton Sal A. Sapiens 3 William C. Estrada (Continued) viii 64 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COMM Board of Directors (Continued) As of June 30, 1994 Aasnav Active Director Districts Alternate Director Tustin Tracy A. Worley 1 Thomaa R. r Saltarelli- - Thomas R. 7 Jim Potts Saltarelli- Jim Potts 14 Tracy A. Worley Villa Park Barry Dens- 2 Bob Bell r Yorba Linda Daniel T. Welch 2 John M. Gullixsov John M. Gullixson - 13 Daniel T. Welch r special Districts: Costa Mesa Sanitary James M. Perryman 1 Nate Reade District r James A. Wahner 6 Arthur Perry James A. Wahner 7 Mike Scheafer Garden Grove Sanitary George L. Zlaket 2 Sheldon S. Singer District - . Sheldon S. Singer 3 George L. Zlaket Midway City Sanitary Margie L. Rice 3 James V. Evans District Irvine Ranch Water Peer A. Swan 14 Darryl G. Miller District r County Areas: Members of the Board Roger R. Stanton 1,2,3 6 11 William G. Steiner of Supervisors William G. Steiner 5,6,7,13 6 Roger R. Stanton 14 r (-Mayor) r r d r ix r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY ORGANIZATIONAL CHART eeuros oa[aoge Datum! e[[eu[ wxxmee coener[eet ra DeKRx xevuom R'Jr acr ornc! orrrc[ rnuxe¢ aaio Ren rqK � [mroxx¢ oeex[Pu MLO [UIPoR[ I/.YRML YMYq KPLfgM gYYO[R e[BVW MlAN[OR x a• m WM[[1NNC[ [fPXCG OM[ttOR OM[C[Oq Of MR[C[Oq Or OaCCtOR or osmR[axt• [ecxrocu or xxxcc xwrew.xa eeRMcee Lno•�wo m e e u [o [ r • [ [ eurrom Inc n Kwx mmn °1°°eim•[" „aoor atr—ID minx• enmxe u a a m a a n a ¢ [ a w e a M PLY Mt gxfL 0. NC! [K RLPM![RL1a[ COMpOL OW4Rr •D[ID]M WY[ COMPgL[R mYRMKWe Y1gRp[P Or[M[OP rxµ.Vq Y.WKq YYYOIRe YYYO@ Y W[p YYYD R[ [CrewaD@ � aYYO@ YYYOLR WNMIP YyyO¢1 LOS ANGt_ES COUNT y. LA NABRA 'w BREA FULLE TON n YORBA �' pq PLAGENTIA LINDA yy BUENA ` LA PARK $ PALMA 0 y 4NAN IN q o CYPRESS VILLA STANTON PARK C LOS :ALAMITOS ORANGE GROVE ESFMINSTER BE 'e SANTA STIN ANA 44 FOUNTAIN VALLEY HUNTINGTON BEACH i © �9 PACIFIC COSTA q MESA IRVINE aceN NEWPORT I BEACH COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA _ 1989 w r r r Financial Section Fiscal Year 1993-94 c 0 U - N N m ► C L-L KPMG Peat Marwick ALP Orange County Office _ Center Tower 650 Town Center Drys Costs Mesa, CA 92626 INDEPENDENT ACmITORS' REPORT The Honorable Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County: �. we have audited the accompanying combined financial statements of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California as of and for the years ended June 30, 1994 and 1993, as listed in the accompanying table of contents. These combined financial statements are the responsibility of the Districts' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial statements are free of material misstatemer.t. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the combined financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management as well as .. evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. we believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California as of June 30, 1994 and 1993, and the results of their operations and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the combined financial statements of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California taken as a whole. The combining financial statements listed in the accompanying table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the combined financial statements of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the combined financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly presented, in all material respects, in relation to the combined financial statements taken as a whole. kP AA44r� Y0 Orange County, California September 22, 1994 1 u u u u u u (THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) U u u u u u U u u u u 2 u rl J 4 .+ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1 r Id rl r r r rl Yi 3 d L.1 I . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF DRUM COUNTY Isl Combined Balance Sheets June 30, 1994 and 1993 y : 1993 1993 V Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents (note 2) $ 183,345,338 155,016,512 Cash held with fiscal agents (note 2) s.9z4.214 4.647.96a y Receivables: Accounts 6,264,277 5,309,923 Accrued interest 4,137,237 3,512,029 Due from other governmental agencies 2,768,817 171,655 b Other 110,170 161.gz2 Total receivables 13,180,401 9.15s.az9 1 60 Inventories 4,516,316 3,947,995 Prepaid and other assets sz 0.ze1 4a.e2s I Total current assets 207.586.550 172,916,911 V Restricted assets: Cash and cash equivalents (notes 2 and 4) 298,366,155 263,080,977 Investments (note 2) 8,976,475 7,369,539 Investments with trustee (note 2) 100,000,000 5010001000 Receivables: Accrued interest 3,887,225 3,553,439 1 i Connection fees 1,732,269 311,532 L,I Die from other Districts 8,948,250 8,926,377 Due from other governmental agencies 2,304,360 2,333,456 Other 5.s43.64] 6,430.871 ' V TOt81 restricted aBBCtB 429.ccq,176 392.006.191 Property, plant and equipment, at cost (notes 3 and e) : Land 7,111,223 5,750,912 L Sewage collection facilities 293,380,564 283,722,244 Sewage treatment facilities 481,427,521 474,250,855 Sewage disposal facilities 80,128,368 57,731,095 General plant and administrative facilities 79,567,547 76,585,091 wo Construction in progress 75.009.115 73,851,063 Total property, plant and equipment 1,016,420,358. 971,891,260 Yd Lees accumulated depreciation 252.526 J62 224.017.990 Net property, plant and equipment 763.893.996• 7a7.g73.2B0 Excess purchase price over book value on acquired L.I assets (notes 5 and 8) 14,717,328 15,375,037 Other assets, at coat, less accumulated amortization 7.7a2.a49 2.915.414 Total assets $ 1.41q.51q.c99 1.= 9g6_CSc V (Continued) V See accompanying notes to combined financial Statements. 4 V 1itl COUNTY SARITATIOR DISTRICTS OF ORAROB CO@R4 Combined Balance Sheets (Continued) s. June 30, 1994 and 1993 1391 199d r Current liabilities payable from current assets: Accounts payable 5 4,252,747 5,087,787 Accrued expenses 5,269,540 593,481 Deposit& 1,047,877 305.805 r Total current liabilities payable from current assets 11,990,164 5.987 M r Current liabilities payable from restricted assets: Retentions payable 1,253,058 1,362,567 Interest payable 6,293,628 9,690,936 Deposits payable 481,043 5,261 We to other districts 8,948,250 8,926,377 Claims and judgments payable, current portion (note 4) 25f,149 346,879 General obligation bonds payable, current portion ti (note 4) 15,000 15,000 Certificates of participation payable, current portion (note 4) 9,655,000 11,975,000 Obligations under reverse repurchase agreements (note 2) 91.s13.000 49.so0.00D r Total current liabilities payable from restricted assets 118.209.128 82.022.020 Long-term liabilities: r Compensated absences (note 4) 3,058,308 2,767,450 Deferred compensation payable 5,924,214 4,647,960 Claims and judgments payable, noncurrent portion 124,251 669,954 r Taxable commercial paper (note 4) 50,000,000 - General obligation bonds payable, noncurrent portion (note 4) 60,000 75,000 Certificates of participation payable, noncurrent r portion (note 4) 417,376,937 421,500,320 Deferred revenue eG.a&9 on.1a1 Total long-term liabilities 476,624,119 429.871.793 r Total liabilities 606.923 J11 517.882.886 Fund equity: Contributed capital (notes 5 and 6) 168,897,938 175,426,887 Retained earnings 622.717.250 587.676.792 Total fund equity 811.615.186 763,101,669 Commitments and contingencies (notes 4, 7 and 11) Total liabilities and fund equity 6 1 41a.538.599 1.280.996.555 See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. 5 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY W Combined Statements of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings L For the years ended June 30, 1994 and 1993 1994 1111 Operating revenues: L service charges $ 70,907,975 69,560,005 Peteit and inspection fees 129.941 456.225 Total operating revenue 71.447,918 1n.0xs.u0 _ W operating exposes other than depreciation and amortization: Salaries and benefit. 4,170,798 4,263,833 Militias 546,688 494,062 Supplies 297,384 354,953 V Contractual services 1,682,840 1,623,746 Directors fee. 102,104 208,133 Travel and ...tinge 5,799 6,950 L Repairs and maintenance 456,718 532.351 Joint operating fund expense allocation, net (note 6) 42,834,264 46,503,410 Other 1a9.ms9 112.44. Total operating expenses other than depreciation and L� amortization 90.279.654 54,099.578 Operating income before depreciation and amortisation 21,168,264 15,929,532 W Depreciation on contributed facilities 75,O73 75,073 Depreciation on other facilities 32,840.147 29,194,920 Amortization on other assets 415,559 1,022,510 Amortization of excess purchase price over book value on atqufrsd asset. (notes 5 and 0) 692.xm9 ssJ.Jag Operating income (lose) 112.L29,2211 (12.010_680) Nan-operating revenues: Id Property taxes 32,857,594 31,053,642 Interest 33,226,317 27,569,469 Federal and state grant revenue - 18,277 Other 6.450.147 2,906,911 �m Total non-operating revenue 72,534,058 62,547,904 Non-operating expenses: L Internet 16,963,574 12,799,026 Other 1 413 980 1.25m.197 Total non-operating expenses 19.377a54 12,049,413 V Income before extraordinary loan on extinguishment of debt 40,335,280 37,471,612 Extraordinary lose on extinguishment of debt (note 4) 6.02e.594 a 4n 191 V Net income 34,307.606 31,056,660 Add depreciation and amortization related to contributed equity (note. 5 and 0) 231.1R1 211.2a1 W Net increase in retained earnings 35,040,468 31,789,442 Retained earnings, beginning of year 587,171 7e2 999.aa1.94m V Retained earnings, end of year $ M-217.25a 9e2.676.xex I See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. 6w 6 V 4 ue COURTS SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Combined Statement. of Cash Plows 4� For the years ended June 30, 1994 and 1993 s 1424 1993 Cash flows from operating activitie.: Net cash provided by operations $ 21,860,460 1 577,916 s Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Proceeds from property taxes 32,857,594 31,053,647 Other non-operating revenue (expense), net 4,026.167 2,674,391 ur Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities 36,893,761 33,728,039 Cash flows from lased by) capital and related financing a activities: Additions to property, plant and equipment (48,935,936) (61,172,055) Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized (21,006,116) (12,286,485) Principal payments on certificates of as participation (54,925,866) (155,953,745) Principal payments on bonds (151000) (15,000) Proceeds from taxable commercial paper 50,000,000 - Proceeds from issuance of certificates of participation 44,438,259 256,862,217 Proceeds from capital contributions 12.7e3.096 11,067,480 Net cash provided (used by) capital as and related financing activities ( 7.661.463) 38.502.412 Cash flows from investing activities: Increeee in investment. (51,606,936) (30,981,812) Interest received 32,091,428 27,911,390 Increase in obligation under reverse repurchase agreement 12.3LI-M 49,500,000 Net cash provided by investing as activities 22,797,492 41,419,578 Net increase in cash and cash equivalent. 64,890,250 121,237,544 we Cash and cash equivelente, beginning of year 422 n4s.4n 3ot.sa7.913 Cash and cash equivalenta, and of year $ 4R7.636,707 422.ys.4n wa (Continued) r am 4r See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. ar 7 s COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OMNM COSOFY L Combined Statements of Cash Flaws (Continued) For the years ended June 30. 1994 and 1993 IV W 1994 1443 Cash flows from operating activities: Operating income (lose) $(12,820,224) (12,020,660) Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) m4 to net cash provided by operations: Depreciation 32,915,220 26,269,993 Amortization 1,073,268 2,680,219 Changes in assets and liabilities: Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable (954,254) (5,495,095) Decrease (increase) in due from other districts (21,873) - Decrease (increase) in due from other W governmental agencies (2,368,066) 360,790 Decrease (increase) in other receivables 939,891 (108,145) Decrease (increase) in inventories (568,421) (171,315) Decrease (increase) in prepaid and other 6y assets (491,452) 202,662 Decrease (increase) in other assets (1,645,835) - Increase (decrease) in accounts payable (835,040) (7,769,226) Increase (decrease) in seemed expenses 4,696.059 142,565 Increase (decrease) in deposits 1,742,072 (21058,658) ♦✓ Increase (Decrease) in deposits payable 475,782 - Increase (decrease) in due to other districts 21,823 - Increase (decrease) in retentions payable (1091509) 83,714 V Increase (decrease) in compensated absences 290,858 597,667 Increase (decrease) in deferred compensation payable 1,276,246 1,111,843 Increase (decrease) in claims and judgments V payable (642,433) (235,395) Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue 1131,6911 11.452 Net cash provided by operations 5 22.16a.a60 ,5�"16 L 6d L ms See accompanying notes to combined financial statements. Lr N 8 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COWFr Notes to Combined Financial Statements sy June 30, 1994 and 1993 1O (11 c .mmnzv o£ cianifi, nt Accounting Policies Reporting Entity r The financial statements of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts)include the operations of nine Districts operating •d within the County of Orange, California. The Districts jointly own and operate certain sewage treatment and disposal facilities for the benefit of residents of Orange County, California. The Districts are managed by a joint administrative organization composed of directors appointed by the member agencies. Each individual District is governed by a board consisting of the mayor, or a designee, of each of the cities, or a representative from the local sewering district within the District and a ,r member of the Board of Supervisors. The Districts utilize joint operating, working capital and capital outlay accounts to pay joint operating and construction costa, which are subsequently allocated to the .e Districts based an gallons of sewage flow. The Districts- balance sheets reflect the allocated balance sheet accounts of the joint operating, working capital and capital outlay funds. The Districts are independent of and overlap many formal political jurisdictions. There are many governmental entities, including the County of Orange, that operate within the Districts' jurisdictions; however, financial information for these entities is not included in the accompanying financial statements based on the following provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 14: • Each entity has an independent elected governing body. • Each entity is solely responsible for its daily operations. • The Districts are neither entitled to operating surpluses nor responsible for operating deficits of any of the entities. • Each entity is exclusively responsible for administration of its own fiscal affairs. •e Dintriet Operations , y The Districts' accounts are maintained in a manner that facilitates compliance with the requirements and guidelines of the Controller of the State of California. An annual report is filed with the State Controller for each District as required by Section 53991 of the r California Government Code. nns;a aF Accot tins Each of the Districts operates as an enterprise activity. Enterprise funds account for operations that are financed and operated in a manner 9 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) u June 30, 1994 and 1993 y similar to private business enterprises, where the intent of the Board of Directors is that the costs (expenses, including depreciation and amortization) of providing services to the general public on a y continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through user charges. Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenses are recognized v in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. All enterprise funds are accounted for on the flow of economic resources measurement focus and use the accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when they are earned, and their expenses are recognized when they are incurred. Unbilled sewer service receivables are recorded at year and. y gyeratina Plans I Each year, Districts' staff prepare annual operating plans for each District. These annual operating plane, as adopted by the respective Boards of Directors, are used to serve as a basis for monitoring I ' financial progress, estimating the levy and collection of taxes and L.I determining future service charge rates. During the year, these plans may be amended as circumstances or levels of operations dictate. V Cash and Cash Em+ivalenta Cash held on deposit with the County Treasurer consists primarily of cash placed in the interest-bearing County Treasurer's commingled funds Lr investment program and is considered a cash equivalent for purposes of the statements of cash flows (see note 2) . Yd Inventory Inventory is stated at the lower of coat or market on a first-in, or first-out basis. Property. Plant and E +inm n V.I Outlays for property, plant, equipment and construction in progress are recorded in the respective Districts. Such outlays may be for either individual District assets or their respective share of joint assets. V Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, except for assets acquired by contribution, which are recorded at fair market value at the time received. Coat includes labor; materials; outside services; Ld vehicle and equipment usage; allocated indirect charges such as engineering, purchasing, supervision and other fringe benefits; and Ld 10 Ir r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANOR COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements r (Continued) June 30, 1994 and 1993 certain administrative and general expenses. Net interest costs are capitalized on projects during the construction period (see note 3) . r Depreciation of plant and equipment is provided for over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets using the straight-line method. r The Districts generally follow the guidelines of estimated useful lives as recommended in the State of California Controllers Uniform System of Accounts for Waste Disposal Districts, which range from 3 to 7S years. Depreciation expense related to contributed plant and equipment is charged to contributed facilities. Amortization of other assets and excess purchase price over book value of joint assets acquired is provided using the straight-line method over r estimated useful lives of S and 30 years, respectively. Discounts on the certificates of participation are amortized to interest expense over the respective terms of the installment obligations based r on their effective interest rates (note 4) . When certificates of participation have been refunded in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance, the related portion of the discount, acquisition costa and deferred gain or loss on terminated interest rate swaps are written off at the date of the refunding and classified as an extraordinary item in the accompanying combined r statement of revenues, ex penses, and changes in retained earnings (note 4) . r Restricted neaet=_ Certain assets are restricted to comply with debt service and capital project bond conversant requirements. Specifically, the assets are restricted for the purposes of installment payments due on certificates of participation, joint treatment works expansion and capital expenditures for improvements. r Interest Rate Fwans r The Districts enter into interest rate swap transactions in connection with the issuance of certificates of participation as part of their overall financing program. These interest rate swaps are accounted for r, as hedges, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the terms of the swap agreement. Gains or losses on terminated interest rate swaps are deferred and amortized to interest 11 r y COMW SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANOS CODNTY y Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) June 30, 1994 and 1993 L expense over the remaining terms of the swap agreements, although the amortization may be accelerated in the case of a refunding of the related certificates of participation in a transaction accounted for as y an in-substance defeasance (see discussion in Amortization above) . Cemnan wa aA heen�ea The Districts' employees, other than operations and maintenance personnel, are granted vacation and sick leave in varying amounts with maximum accumulations of 200 hours and 560 hours for vacation and sick days earned but unused, respectively. Operations and maintenance personnel accrue "Personal Leave" at a rate L of between 60 and 200 hours per year depending on years of service. Personal leave can be accumulated up to a maximum of 400 hours. I Vacation and sick leave benefits and personal days are recorded when y earned in the accompanying Districts' financial statements as long-term liabilities under the caption "Compensated absences.- In determining the estimated sick leave liability at June 30 of each year, the L Districts assume that all employee accumulated sick leave balances will ultimately be paid out. i ri a•mn and ..,dements L The Districts records estimated losses, net of any insurance coverage under its self-insurance program (see Self-Insurance Plane below) when V it is probable that a claim liability has been incurred, and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Claims payable, which includes I an estimate for -incurred but unreported claims- is recorded in each of y the Districts' funds. PiDDLY T�= `; Property taxes attach as an enforceable lien on property as of March 1. Taxea are levied on July 1 and are payable in two installments which become delinquent after December 10 and April 10. The County bills and collects the property taxes and remits them to the Districts in installments during the year. Districts property tax revenues are recognized when levied to the extent that they are available to finance y current operations. The County is permitted by State law (Proposition 13) to levy taxes at L 1t of full market value (at time of purchase) and can increase the assessed values no more than two percent per year. The Districts V 12 � 1 y r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGS COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements ,r (Continued) June 30, 1994 and 1993 .e receive a share of this basic levy proportionate to what was received in the 1976 to 1975 period. .mint oo�erat+onw The Districts are participants in an agreement dated March 10, 1971, as amended July 1, 1985, which provides for the joint construction, ownership and operation of certain treatment and disposal property, plant, equipment and other assets. Under the agreement, the respective `tl District equity percentages in jointly owned assets are based on gallons of sewage flow. Equity percentages are determined at the end of each fiscal year and prevail for the ensuing year. r Construction coats of jointly owned assets are allocated to the various individual Districts. Joint operating expenses are allocated to the Dis- tricts based on gallons of sewage flow during the year. Payroll, related benefits and certain overhead items are allocated to the individual Districts primarily based on direct labor hours. rn Deferred Comoenaation Plan ,r The Districts offers its employees a deferred compensation plan established in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The plan permits all District employees to defer a portion of their salary until future years. The amount deferred is not available to employees until termination, retirement, death or for unforeseeable emergency. All amounts of compensation deferred under the plan, all property and rd rights purchased with those amounts and all income attributable to those amounts, property or rights are (until paid or made available to the employee or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the Districts (without being restricted to the provisions of benefits under the plan) , subject only to the claims of the Districts' general creditors. Participants' rights under the plan are equal to those of general creditors of the Districts in an amount equal to the fair market value of the deferred account for each participant. For certain key employees (General Manager and Department Heads) , the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 3t of their gross annual salaries, provided the employees voluntarily contribute an equal or greater sum. In addition, the Districts have agreed to contrib- ute an amount not to exceed 3% of gross annual salaries, which does not require matching contributions by the employee. For certain employees (Assistant Department Heads) , the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 2% of their gross annual salaries, provided the 13 V CODNTF SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORA= COMMf �+ Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) y June 30, 1994 and 1993 �.i employees voluntarily contribute an equal or greater sum. In addition, the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 2-1/2t of , gross annual salaries, which does not require matching contributions by v the employee. For certain other employees (Supervisors) , the Districts have agreed to V contribute an amount not to exceed It of their gross annual salaries, provided the employees voluntarily contribute an equal or greater sum. In addition, the Districts have agreed to contribute an amount not to exceed 2%- of gross annual salaries, which does not require matching I.l contributions by the employee. I Earnings generated by the plan are nontaxable to the employees until V received, which occurs after retirement, termination, or District action approving withdrawal. Funds are invested for the participants, with earnings thereon accruing to the benefit of each participant in proportion to his or her investment. The Districts have no liability for losses under the plan but do have the duty of due care that would be required of an ordinary prudent investor. The Districts believe that it L is unlikely that they will use the assets to satisfy claims of general creditors in the future. Assets of the plan, stated at market value, totaled $5,924,214 at June 30, 1994. V S 1f-Ind For the year ended June 30, 1994, the Districts were self-insured for V workers' compensation, property damage and general liability. The self- insured portion for worker's compensation is $250,000 per person per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $5 million. The self-insured portion for property damage covering fire, flood, and other V perils is $25,000 per occurrence with outside excess insurance coverage to $35 million for flood and $200 million for fire and other perils. The self-insured portion for property damage covering earthquake isL,; $250,000 or 54; per unit of insurance, whichever is greater, with outside insurance coverage to $35 million. The Districts also maintain outside comprehensive boiler and machinery insurance with a $100 million per occurrence combined limit with deductibles ranging from $25,000 to $200,000. The Districts are completely self insured for general liability coverage. W As of February 1, 1994, the Districts obtained outside insurance coverage for group medical claims and are no longer self-insured. IU Districts' management believes that there are no outstanding claims as of June 30, 1994 that would materially affect the financial position of the Districts. 14 V r �. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANOS COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) June 30, 1994 and 1993 Claims against the Districts are processed by outside insurance administrators. These claims are charged to claims expense based on amounts which will ultimately be paid. Claims incurred but not yet reported have been considered in determining the accrual for loss contingencies. Insurance expense is allocated to the individual Districts based on wastewater flows. Contributed Bauity b Connection fees represent fees received from developers and residents to join new or extend existing trunk sewer systems in excess of the cost to r connect. Capital replacement charges represent fees charged to certain special districts and agencies for their proportionate share of fixed asset expenditures. Connection fees and capital replacement charges are recorded as contributed equity. Re 1aasr ifi rntionw r Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year statements for comparison purposes. f21 Cash and Invcstmenta Cash and investments are valued at the lower of cost or market, except for assets of the deferred compensation plan, which are valued at market. m The Districts are authorized by statute to invest in obligations of the V.S. Treasury and state and local governmental agencies, commercial paper a� and deposits with financial institutions. The unrestricted cash and investments and a majority of the restricted cash and cash equivalents represent funds on deposit with the orange County Pooled Investment Fund r (County Treasurer) . Funds on deposit with the County Treasurer are not categorized, as Governmental Accounting Standards Board MASS) Statement No. 3 does not require categorization of investment pools managed by another government. The California Government Code requires California " banks and savings and loans to secure local government deposits by pledging government securities equal to 110t of the deposits or by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes equal to 1500k of the deposits. Cash and Cash Rm ivalents _ Cash and cash equivalents are categorized to give an indication of the level of risk assumed by the Districts at year-end. Districts- demand cash accounts are Category 1, which include deposits insured or collateralized with securities held by the entity or by its agent in the 15 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANOB COUNTY 1r Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) V June 30, 1994 and 1993 N entity's name. All other District deposits are Category 2, which include deposits collateralized with securities held by the financial institution's trust department or agent in the Districts' name. V Funds on deposit within the Districts' Deferred Compensation plan are not categorized, because the underlying assets of these funds are either invested with the County Treasurer or invested within open-ended mutual funds. Decisions regarding these investments are made by agents for the Districts who are acting in accordance with agreements with the Districts. All such investments are not required to be categorized under U interpretive guidelines issued by OASB. A summary of cash and cash equivalents follows: V 1994 Bank nnreatrinted nentriated Blanc Catean 6.1 Demand cash account. $ 11,306 109,590 128,728 1 Cash and investments with County Treasurer 183,334,032 263,690,447 446,991,816 N/A V Certificates of participation installment payment funds with State Street Bank and Trust - 25,238,500 25,238,500 2 Vj Cash held by trustee - 9,327,618 9,327,618 2 Deferred compensation 5,924,214 - 5,924,214 N/A $ 112 269.552 299.366.155 1991 Bank nnrentrinted Restricted BAlsacs Catemnry Cash and investments with County Treasurer $ 155,016,512 193,173,096 331,277,966 N/A L,d Certificates of participation installment payment funds with State Street Bank and Trust - 68,972,785 60,972,798 2 6.,j Escrow funds held by Trustee - 870,895 070,895 2 Cash held by trustee - 64,199 64,199 2 Deferred compensation 4 647 968 - 4,647,968 N/A V $ L9.664.480 2fil D .977 Investments V Restricted investments are in reserve funds held by State Street Bank and Trust and Texas Commerce Bank as specified in the trust agreements (note 16 W ti r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) June 30, 1994 and 1993 r 4) . The Districts' investments are categorized to give an indication of the level of risk assumed by the Districts at year-end. All District r investments are category 2, which includes uninsured and unregistered investments for which the securities are held by the counterparty'e trust department or agent in the Districts' name. r A summary of investments follows: Guaranteed r Investment District Contract Number ICateoory 2) r 1 $ 796,213 2 3,386,824 3 1,929,045 r 5 1,203,745 fi 328,539 7 924,577 11 40].532 r Total $ a.97E.4]5 Market value $ 6.97E.4]5 r RcyaxRa_Rc9=h&as kargnment The State of California Government Code permits the Districts to enter Y° into reverse repurchase agreements, that is, a sale of securities with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase them in the future at the same price plus a contract rate of interest. Substantially all reverse repurchase r agreements are made with SEC-registered securities brokerages. The proceeds from these agreements may be used to invest in securities permissible under the provisions of Government Code Section 53635, r primarily U.S. Treasury and U.S. agency obligations, commercial paper and certificates of deposit. The market value of the securities underlying reverse repurchase '+ agreements normally exceeds the cash received, providing the dealers a margin against a decline in market value of the securities. If the dealers default on their obligations to resell these securities to the r Districts or provide securities or cash of equal value, the Districts would suffer an economic loss equal to the difference between the market value plus accrued interest of the underlying securities and the agreement obligation, including accrued interest. This credit exposure at year-end was approximately $4,800,000. r 17 r coDNrr eAN1TaT2oN DIBTRTCfB OF ORANGE coDlrrf Lr Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) V June 30, 1994 and 1993 6r A summary of the reverse repurchase agreements follows: ASX22mont Underlying 8em.rities L $46,813,000 received, to be $50,000,000 mortgage backed repaid with interest of 4.194 securities with a coupon rate of � on July 27, 1994 5.10% maturing on April 28, 1998 $45,000,000 received, to be $50,000,000 mortgage backed repaid with interest of 4.304 securities with a coupon rate of V on August 1, 1994 4.944 maturing on November 30, 1998 V The agreements are collateralized by $8,187,000 of the Districts' commingled funds held by the county of orange. (31 ..,,,nnt and na ion in Pr Pmmerty. Plant. Hmj _ pgrean 6w Respective District ownership in jointly owned and separately owned prop- erty, plant, equipment and construction in progress, at coat, at June 30, 1994 and 1993 follows: pTgpenty. Plat and Em,inm nt I L.i 1994 oea 6J District Jointly Separately No_ Dwned Owned Total Total 1 $ 64,492,456 7,039,901 71,532,357 68,684,540 2 195,326,107 94,454,636 289,780,743 278,273,333 3 206,415,693 62,694,104 269,109,797 262,994,630 5 23,103,745 35,277,180 58,380,925 52,680,577 Lr 6 32,741,709 2,929,619 35,671,328 35,519,959 7 49,837,765 37,708,194 87,545,959 79,300,222 11 39,672,345 19,227,340 58,899,685 57,163,520 13 6,072,859 2,462,957 8,535,816 6,463,069 L 14 42.572.157 19.386.456 61,958,613 56,960,347 66n.234.a36 281.180 U2 941.415.223 898.040.197 lual L 18 u m COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements re (Continued) June 30, 1994 and 1993 Construction in Prooragn r 999 IM District Jointly Separately No. Owned Owned Total Total 1 $ 8,016,364 - 8,016,364 7,742,496 y� 2 22,135,052 406,038 22,541,090 22,155,882 3 20,281,415 1,218,362 21,499,777 20,572,829 5 2,790,273 683,125 3,473,398 51885,869 6 2,726,481 508,751 3,235,232 3,043,119 `a 7 4,297,556 1,200,523 5,498,072 6,779,881 11 3,330,848 3,177,289 6,508,137 3,857,130 13 375,649 - 375,649 319,780 s 14 2,980,071 1,277-146 3.857.41] 1,494,077 66,911,711 9,471,424 79,009,139 71,891 ,093 Total property, plant and equipment $126.768.597 289.651.811 1.016.420.359 971.891.260 For the years ended June 30, 1994 and 1993, the Districts capitalized net construction period interest coat, included in construction in progress, as follows: 1994 1991 District Capitalized Capitalized NO TrtorpAt Interest b 1 $ 145,807 917,328 2 369,816 3,243,728 3 454,472 2,316,449 a+ 5 - 871,891 6 93,764 353,216 7 108,476 762,909 11 184,196 371,823 13 - 6,234 14 16,669 � $ 1.356.531 B.B80.247 19 m COUNTY SANITATION DIBTRICTB OF ORANOB COUNTY U Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) June 30, 1994 and 1993 (4) Lono-Term Deht Following is a aummary of long-term debt for the year ended June 30, V 1994: Balance Balance Iy July 1 June 30 1993 Addl ions Deletions 1994 Compensated Absences $ 2,767,450 290,858 - 3,058,308 L Claims and Judgments payable 1,016,833 - 642,433 374,400 1 Taxable commercial V paper - 50,000,000 - 50,000,000 General obligation bonds 90,000 - 15,000 75,000 Certificates of participation 413,745,000 46,000,000 51.715.000 428.030.000 Totals 5437.619.283 $6 290.B5B 52.272 L AB1.537.70B iu Cnnpensated ntiaencea V The Districts' policies related to compensated absences are described in Note 1. This liability will be paid in future years from future resources: 83.05e.3 oe L Claimer and judgments-Payable The Districts are self-insured in a number of areas Ir as described in Note 1: $374,400 Lees current portion 250.149 Total long-term 1124.251 General Obligation Honda 1958 District No. 11 General Obligation Bonds with interest at it payable in annual installments of V $15,000 to maturity in January 1999: $75,000 Lees current portion 15.000 V Total long-term 660.00n 6w 20 V m COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANOR COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) June 30, 1994 and 1993 Ta+r hle omm r ial Pae .y The Districts issued $50 million of Taxable Commercial Paper ("Commercial Paper") in January 1994. Commercial Paper is short-term and does not r have to be used for a specific project, but it moat be used to finance construction, maintenance and operation expenditures of the Districts. At June 30, 2994, Commercial Paper included various debt maturities purchased by outside investors with maturities ranging from July 1994 through August 1994. Commercial Paper interest rates range from eo 4.326 to 4.50% at June 30, 1994. Total long-term) 650.000.000 s Certificate, of Participation The Districts sell certificates of participation in r order to finance their respective share of the construction scheduled at the jointly owned treatment facilities. Each certificate of participation represents a direct and proportionate interest in the semi-annual interest payments. Each district is. responsible for its own installment payment and is not obligated for any other District's payments. Installment payments for the issues are payable from any source of lawfully available funds of the Districts. All of the e. District-s certificates of participation are 25-year issuances except for the 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation which is a 23-year .. issuance. Certificates of participation at June 30, 1994 are summarized as follows: 1990-1992 Series A Certificates of Participation $ 96,000,000 1990-1992 Series N Certificates of Participation 35,045,000 1990-1992 Series C Certificates of Participation 97,100,000 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation 153,885,000 `. 1993 Refunding Certificates Of Participation 46,000,000 428,030,000 Current portion (9,655,000) Unamortized original issue discount (998.063) Total long-term $ 417.376.437 21 V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY b' Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) V June 30, 1994 and 1993 19R6 Certificates of Participation u On August 13, 1986, Districts Numbers 1, 2 and 3 completed the sale of $117,000,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments were due February 1 and August 1, beginning February 1, 1987. Annual y principal payments were due August 1, beginning August'l, 1988. In December 1992, the entire remaining principal balance of the certificates was refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of participation (see below) in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance de£easance. V l 0 ]os➢ c ins A i + a a o Par i ins ion On December 5, 1990, all Districts completed the sale of $100,000,000 of y certificates of participation. Interest payments are due monthly beginning January 1991. The interest rate on the certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, V 1994 was 2.2%. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1991. V All principal and interest payments are to be secured by nine separate irrevocable letters of credit issued by National Westminster Rank. The letters of credit will expire on December 15, 2000, unless earlier terminated. The Districts have the option of prepaying certificates in whole or in part at an amount equal to the principal plus accrued interest, if any, Ise without premium. 1990-1992 c_ariae E Certificates of Participation L On May 1, 1991, Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of $117,555,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments are due February 1 and August 1 of each year. The weighted average V interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994 was 5%. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1992. The certificates were issued with an original issue discount of $3,731,496. 6W The trust agreement for the certificates established a reserve fund equal to $7,369,539, which was funded from certificate proceeds and is being held by Texas Commerce Rank, the trustee (note 2) . In addition, Federal Guaranty Insurance Company provides municipal bond insurance for the certificates. LO 22 64 m COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGS COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements .. (Continued) June 30, 1994 and 1993 ve In December 1992, $38,350,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the r certificates was refunded with a portion of the proceeds of the December 1992 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see below) in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. sr In September 1, 1993, $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the certificates was refunded from the proceeds of the September 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation (see below)in a transaction accounted for as an in-substance defeasance. In May 1991, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an e interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts paid a floating interest rate equal to- the J.J. Kenny (High Grade) Index plus 1.19% and received a fixed interest rate of 5.56% on a notional amount of $111,837,000. The swap agreement was terminated in November 1992. The resulting gain of $5,174,102 was deferred and was amortized to interest expense over the original term of the agreement. There is no deferred swap gain remaining at June 30, 1994. .d On September 1, 1992, Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of $98,500,000 of certificates of participation. Interest payments are due monthly, beginning October 7, 1992. The interest rate r on the certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. The weighted average interest rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994 was 2.2%. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1993. m _ The trust agreement for the certificates established a reserve fund equal to $9,850,000, which was funded from certificate proceeds and is being w,+ held by State Street Rank and Trust, the trustee (note 2) . December 1992 Refunding rArtifi a ea of Participation On December 3, 1992, Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of $160,600,000 of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted by the �. remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments were due August 1, beginning August 1, 1993. On October 1, 1992, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed interest rate of 5.554 and receive a variable interest rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the 23 r 4 i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANOR COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) V June 30, 1994 and 1993 remarketing agent on a notional amount of $160,600,000. This interest rate swap agreement is accounted for as a hedge, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest 6.1 rates cbange and is amortized to interest expense over the term of the swap agreement. The 20-year swap agreement matures on August 1, 2013. The certificates were issued to refund the remaining outstanding 6-0 principal balance of the 1986 certificates of participation and $38,350,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92 Series B certificates of participation. The refunding qualifies as an in- y substance defeasance with the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for all future debt service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly, the trust account assets and the V liability for the defeased certificates of participation are not included in the Districts' combined financial statements. In fiscal 1993, the Districts recognized an accounting loss of $6,421,151 on the refunding which was classified as an extraordinary item in the accompanying combined statement of revenues, expenses and changes in retained earnings. However, the Districts reduced their aggregate debt V service payments by approximately $6,891,000 over the next 25 years and obtained an economic gain difference between the present values of the old and new debt service payments of approximately $4,864,000. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt outstanding at Jose 30, 1994 was $142,750,000. Sntemier 199a Reft din,1 Cert ificatea of Participa ion VY On September 2, 1993, Districts Numbers 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 completed the sale of $46,000,000 of refunding certificates of participation. The interest rate on the refunding certificates is adjusted by the remarketing agent daily based on market interest rates. Annual principal payments are due August 1, beginning August 1, 1994. 6w On September 1, 1993, the Districts and a brokerage company entered into an interest rate exchange swap agreement pursuant to which the Districts will pay a fixed interest rate of 4.56t and receive a variable interest V rate based on a tax exempt daily interest rate as determined by the remarketing agent on a notional amount of $46,000,000. This interest rate swap agreement is accounted for as a hedge, and the associated interest rate differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest 6W rates change and is amortized to interest expense over the term of the swap agreement. The 22-year swap agreement matures on August 1, 2016. V The certificates were issued to refund $39,740,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the 1990-92 Series B certificates of participation. N 24 V r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements r (Continued) June 30, 1994 and 1993 ee _ The refunding qualifies as an in-substance defessance with the proceeds being held in an irrevocable trust by an outside trustee to provide for r all future debt service payments on both debt issues. Accordingly, the trust account assets and the liability for the defeased certificates of participation are not included in the Districts' combined financial statements. The Districts recognized an accounting loss of $6,028,594 on the refunding which was classified as an extraordinary item in the r accompanying combined statement of revenues, expenses and changes in retained earnings. However, the Districts reduced their aggregate debt service payments by approximately $2,625,000 over the next 22 years and r obtained an economic gain difference between the present values of the old and new debt service payments of approximately $3,647,000. The aggregate principal amount of refunded debt outstanding at June 30, 1994 ® was approximately $39,740,000. Annual Amortization R,quixcmc= r The annual requirements to amortize all Districts' debt other than compensated absences and claims and judgments payable as of June 30, 1994, including interest payments of $350,015,094 ,are as follows: General Certificates nhlieatinn Honda of Particination r Year ending June 30: 1995 $ 15,750 $ 36,581,962 1996 15,600 36,485,039 ^° 1997 15,450 36,340,993 1998 15,300 36,293,599 1999 151150 36,355,429 Thereafter 595.925.R22 S 77.250 $ 779.042.644 r r 25 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Ey Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) Jane 30, 1994 and 1993 1 M f ) nn r6 + d +i v y The following is a summary of the changes in contributed capital for the year ended June 30, 1994 and 1993, respectively: capital Custti- Amerti- Cutioro eation y ftw- of Irvine Breese capital Depreciation Ranch NCCLa6e connection Replace- water Price ever Balance at Pea. meat contributed District Book Value valence at +90a Warned cuua s ilit• (sure al a 9) Zest 30 1994 District No. 1 $ 4,512,987 37,511 224.945 - - - 4,075,443 District Ne. 2 32,902,257 2.187,235 181.03, - - - 36,4]0,531 District No. 3 22,133,646 1,071,470 128.031 - - - 24,228,147 District No. 5 11.250,915 217,996 80.419 - Sao,496 - 22,130,820 District No. 6 4,591,479 40,434 113,961 - - - 4.151,871 District No. 3 13,754,430 537,673 173.246 (75,0731 - - 14,390,276 District We. 11 11,132,029 209,547 325,173 - - - 11,666,]49 District No. 13 S.459,SS4 637,035 6.555 - - - 6,Se3,944 District No. 14 147 U4 q4 (197 709) 14 +t] 143 Total $ 1ys.4 a6.ee2 5,34q.IM 2..Q1.i1S 1-c.n-•) (.t7 Ile) y Capital COotri- Aseeli- butiwe reties 1Y/ from of Irvine BXCe 9e Capital Depreciation Reach Purchase Cat .tion Replace- on water Price Oyer Balance at Pees sent Contributed District Back Value Balance at s + 149a —ad Memeg 9ne'+ltiav jams sl Isere District No. 1 $ 4,512,967 - - - - - 4,512,987 District No. 2 30.913,190 1,909,067 - - - - 32.802,259 District No. 3 22,332,691 1.1D0,955 - - - - 21,9]3.646 WW District N0. 5 20,058,812 49,890 - - 1,142,213 - 3l.250,9lS District No. 6 4.372,453 225.024 - - - - 4.597,477 District We. ] 23.624,314 205.109 (75,0731 - 13.]S4A30 District No. ll 10,851,164 272,365 - - - - 11.132,029 District Na. 13 5.290.308 179.246 - - - - 5,451,554 District No. 14 S.v._e IS,2.1➢4) T0ta1 $ 16e.ee n. 3.891.136 IL.LI11 E.3i1.]11 ISS].389) 4 99I u (6) Joint Oo ratti++c Fund uxo nee Allocation The Districts utilize joint operating, working capital and capital outlay V accounts to pay joint operating and construction costs, which are subsequently allocated amongst the Districts based on gallons of sewage 1 J 4e1 26 r r COUNTS SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY '- Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) - June 30, 1994 and 1993 r flow. A Summary of joint operating coats follows: r 1994 1991 Revenue: Service charges $ 2,492,026 $ 1,999,091 ae Other 2.301.1]8 1,740,292 Total revenue 4.793.154 3,719,343 Expenses: Salaries and benefits 26,076,825 24,660,377 r Supplies 4,425,889 4,143,272 Contractual 7,051,638 7,654,008 - Repairs and maintenance 3,060,498 3,115,490 Utilities 4,041,977 6,740,291 rr Other 2,970,991 4.009.315 Total expenses 47.627.418 50.322.753 r Net joint operating expenses $ 42.834.264 $ 4s.583.410 r f71 pension Plan The Districts participate in the Orange County Employee's Retirement System ("OCERS") , a cost-sharing multiple-employer, defined benefit pension plan. OCERS was established in 1945 under the provisions of the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, and provides members with retirement, death, disability, and coat-of-living benefits. The payroll r of employees covered by OCERS was $27,704,833 for the year ended June 30, 1994 and $24,605, 921 for the year ended June 30, 1993; the Districts' total payroll was $28,692,733 in 1994 and $26,757,759 in 1993. 'e1 Benefit, All District full-time employees participate in OCERS. Employees who r retire at or after age 50 with ten or more years of service are entitled to an annual retirement allowance. The amount of the retirement - allowance is based upon the member's age at retirement, the member's "final compensation" as defined in Section 31462 of the Retirement Law of 1937, the total years of service under OCERS, and the employees' _ classification as a Tier I or Tier II member. Benefits fully vest on reaching five years of service. OCERS also provides death and disability benefits. r 27 d✓ L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements I , (Continued) L June 30, 1994 and 1993 L root.wilt a one Tier I and Tier II covered employees are required to contribute 4.80t- 7.38t and 6.54t-10.06t, respectively, of their annual compensation to OCERS. The Districts are required to make periodic contributions to OCERS in amounts that are estimated to remain a constant percentage of I . covered employees' compensation such that, when combined with covered employees' contributions, will fully provide for all covered employees' benefits by the time they retire. The contribution requirement for the year ended June 30, 1994 was $2,414,117 and $2,524,661 for the year ended June 30, 1993, which consisted of $1,779,310 from the Districts and $934,807 from employees; these contributions represented 6,4t and 2.3% of covered payroll, respectively. These contribution were entirely made to cover the normal pension cost since the Districts have no unfunded liability. Pensign Renefit Obligation w The amount shown below as the "pension benefit obligation" is a standardized disclosure measure of the present value of pension benefits, IJ adjusted for the effects of projected salary increases and step-rate , benefits estimated to be payable in the future as a result of employee service to date. The measure, which is the actuarial present value of credited projected benefits, is intended to help users assess OCERS' funding status on a going-concern basis, assess progress made in accumulating sufficient assets to pay benefits when due, and make j comparisons among other public employees retirement systems and t�l employers. OCERS does not make separate measurements of assets and pension benefit obligations for individual employers. The pension benefit obligation at December 31, 1993 for OCERS as a whole, determined through an actuarial valuation performed as of that date, is as follows: IIV'' i� V L V 28 ti se COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) June 30, 1994 and 1993 _ necenle� �1. im 1992 (in thousands) Pension benefit obligation: Retirees and beneficiaries currently receiving benefits and terminated employees not yet receiving benefits $ 899,240 807,212 Active participants: ® Provided by employee contributions including allocated investment income 369,199 327,402 Provided by employer contributions: Vested benefits 347,798 326,377 Nonvested benefits 394,306 391,747 Total pension benefit obligation 2,000,543 1,844,738 Net assets available for benefits, at market value 2,226,442 1. 945.122 s, Net assets in excess of pension benefit obligation $ (225.999) f100.384) d . . In the prior year, several actuarial assumptions and methods changed. The mortality assumption was changed from the 1971 GAM Male Mortality to the 1983 GAM Male and Female Mortality. The assumed rates of withdrawal _ were reduced 15t. The unallocated fund balance was decreased to 5% of fund assets with the decrease split 75% to County Advance Reserves and 25* to the Additional Retiree Benefit Account. The Board of Retirement elected to phase in these changes in assumptions over three years, beginning December 31, 1992. Under the new funding method, the expected effect on the employer contribution rate is an increase in the contribution as employees reach retirement age. Significant actuarial assumptions used in the valuation include a rate of r return of 8% and projected salary increases of 6.0% per annum per individual. 29 u CM47r SANITATION DI8TRIC78 OF ORANGE COUNTY bw Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) June 30, 1994 and 1993 V Historical Trend Information Ten-year historical trend information showing the OC®tS' progress in � accumulating sufficient assets to pay benefits when due is presented in the OCSRS' December 31, 1993 annual financial report. (al Transactions with Irvine Ranch Water nistriet District No. 14 1 6'1 The Districts formed Sanitation District No. 14 as a result of a negoti- ated Agreement between the Districts and Irvine Ranch Water District ("IRWD") as of July 1, 1985. pursuant to the Agreement, IRWD paid the Districts $34,532,000 for an initial 15,000,000 gallons per day capacity in the Districts' joint treatment facilities (with an ultimate collection capacity of 32,000,000 gallons per day) , together with a pro-rata V interest in real property based on flow of 32,000,000 gallons per day. The book value of the assets purchased by IRWD was determined to be $14,553,000 as of June 30, 1986. The excess of the purchase price over the assets' book value of $19,979,000 at June 30, 1986 is being amortized Iwo over the remaining 30-year useful lives of the joint assets of District No. 14. As of June 30, 1994, $5,261,672 of the excess of purchase price over the assets' book value was amortized. u IRWD entered into a separate agreement with District No. 14 whereby IRWD agreed to annually fund payment of District No. 141e proportionate share of the District's joint capital outlay revolving fund budget requirements and certain capital improvements during the term of the agreement, which contribution amounted to $5,398,519 in 1994 and $5,235,104 in 1993 (see note 5) . The contributions are included as contributed equity in the N accompanying combined balance sheet. District No. 14's share of the joint capital outlay revolving fund budget is calculated, as discussed in note 1 under -Joint Operations, - based on a minimum flow of fifteen million gallons per day. Once District No. 14's flow exceeds the per day minimum, the calculation will be based on actual flow. District No. 5 V IRWD also entered into an agreement with District No. 5 to provide funding to District No. 5 for the construction costa of certain 6W wastewater collection, transmission, treatment and disposal facilities to be used by IRWD (the "Downcoast Agreement-) . Such funding amounted to $589,498 in 1994 and $1,905,713 in 1993 and is included as contributed equity in the accompanying combined balance sheet. The agreement also provided that IRWD would not be required to pay connection fees related 30 r r COMITY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) June 30, 1994 and 1993 Id to development in the DOWnCoast Area (as defined in the Downcoast Agreement) . r 19) In +£i_d R ivahl a/Payahlea .e Interfund receivables and payables at June 30, 1994 are as follows: gyyd Receivable p3y�le r. District No. 1 $ 69,142 - District No. 3 3,424,392 - District No. 5 3,217,552 - District No. 6 2,167,577 District No. 11 69,587 - District No. 2 - 3,081,235 District No. 7 - 2,668,793 District No. 13 - 839,383 District No. 14 2.I5R.899 r Total 4B.94B.290 B.94B.= r (10) Segment Infnrma[3Dn The Districts consist of nine individual Districts that provide sewerage �. services and are financed primarily through user charges. Rey financial data of the individual Districts, in thousands of dollars, are as -- follows: r Operating Depr. & Amort. Operating Net Ryes EypEDge Inc. (Loss/ Ins(L ,,) District No. 1 $ 7,121 2,839 (991) 608 District No. 2 24,318 10,747 (2,424) 9,395 District No. 3 22,885 9,093 (1,187) 13,251 District No. 5 3,063 975 308 3,122 District No. 6 3,585 970 265 2,334 District No. 7 6,304 3,616 (2,655) 3,539 r+ District No. 11 3,338 2,026 (1,429) 3,340 District No. 13 831 426 (131) 1,286 District No. 14 3 3,296 (4,576) (2,56B) 31 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANOS COUNTY Notes to Combined Financial Statements (Continued) L June 30, 1994 and 1993 �d Additions To Total Net Working Total Contrih Cani a1 AM= CART " EM= ud District No. 1 $ 262 108,242 36,237 38,090 District No. 2 3,668 422,406 146,849 226,961 District No. 3 1,795 404,703 156,069 219,700 y District No. 5 888 87,835 32,425 57,329 District No. 6 154 61,462 26,219 35,165 District No. 7 636 136,434 53,586 89,311 II District No. 11 535 97,428 41,306 60,654 District No. 13 644 20,092 10,631 17,097 District No. 14 4,889 79,936 3,524 67,308 L (11) Commitmentn and rnntinaancien Cnmmitm nts At June 30, 1994, the Districts had commitments to pay in the future approximately $20,125,707 under current construction contracts on a 4i progress payment basis as construction is completed. Legal Proceedinas � The Districts are involved in several actions in which they have been named defendants. Management is of the opinion, based in part on discussions with legal counsel, that the outcome of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Districts. 60 1d U 1iy Ys' 32 L� y ti V V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OP ORANGE COUNTY V COMBINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 11 V Yet r V �1 L.i r i e r 33 r lWnr BMrnnos 0]BRIRB Or D95M tWltr9 CRMnmg 9.l.nce Meer une ]0. I99. M1t4 Gbapavtive Maim for]um 30. loci District District District platelet District District District District District Up...l he l Ya...l ya, C .a. I .e. 1 0d...11 as. +1 pa. +. 1994 1491 Nrrynt ...I.: Coo and use a0ulvelentB 0 Ile tl0.699 .6.00.]OS 58.011.113 14.164,311 10.09LB69 21.I.I.W11 11.111.)A 1.1 A.116 .'are 41.]I5.))0 SSS..11.In Case held with fiscal agent. 277.322 �p11.1 �p.$42 yCJLI Receivables: AerwnU 612.011 11.111". 1.958.006 L6 ]10.10] Ni.HS 111..11 41.1i3 .0)pe. 1.114.171 5.]09.9i1 AmtuM Interest 10.015 Logo.,., I.I..III 196017 2IO.B10 491.396 "1".. M.It 31.a1B ..111.211 3,112,029 Dun I.M.a[ govaroen[el agencies 1.1..52 OL.MS e...... ...... 112.1]] lel.OU 1...]0 ll1.Ol1 i.f6 B.a1 i11.411 other a' 1,, Thal receivables nor .71 J42.➢l1 115.91, it6166 i nventa[l ea 441.344 1.))f.11. 1.411.1S1 150.011 ]]cline W,1.2 ]1l..]1 11.110 190.199 .a 516.116 1.9O.B95 preppie .M .thee a �4.111 �L931 �L116 �.I12 �Ll➢1 Met Nr[.nt ...to ..A.f...I ll.11l.lBp 111.1 In S.i4L at, SSIiJL Re.t[]etae .seem Cash and -In e0ulve lenU 12,011.001 95.)19.10a 96.111.264 13.011.569 12.018.989 1..569.OS4 3].15 i.650 1,753.654 3.719,10. 190.166.155 ]O.OM.917 1-tan nta 1.1.2. 1.386.824 ..919.04$ l.IDl.l.1 )]9.639 "..Sll 401.11. - 0.916.05 1J69.M9 . vie. trust- 9.110.000 ]9.590.000 I].if0.000 3,500.000 4.960.000 1.550.000 6.010.000 910.000 6.4]0.000 100,000,000 $0.000.000 e.iosnte e, sc neetu.0 Internet 111,112 1,111.343 1.114.761 199.a0. 145.595 .Deli. 12..990 1111115 Is 510 3.0.1.121 ......419 connection fees 5.". .11.14. 412.400 1a 9.650 11.150 101.I50 - .a."1 - 11111.1., 111..12 Due from other Districts 69.1.] - 1,424,392 3.2I1.552 l.lo..11 69.5.1 - - 0.940.]50 ..1.6.171 W. frm at., Ion.-cal ag.Mlea 216.911 101.51, 121.11. 1..9.9 114,903 I1..lf] .l."" ]Lill 141 . 0..]60 1.I."... other J0.41! .1 far Met ...ecteee0 3C274.110 132 110 194 + 21.417269 39.L11.1LL 30440.➢61 3p.16➢.911 11.1Sf.Llf Property. plant anal equipment. at COsc. IaM swill 1,404.1.. I.HO.M9 ]]1.911 216.611 ].s66.sI5 400,210 39..71 401.0.. 1.111.211 1.1...112 a-he collection 0acllltle. 0.411.coal 90,305,363 In.914..10 15.10i.659 )1.14.).9 19.9.5.154 1.101.1.. ]0.].I.oO i91.I00.56. ]91.1]1.144 ...ag. Collection (.[little. 41.01,111 R1.NB.Sale I50.Sa6.o1. 16.956,613 93,050.470 34.346.e14 29..32,597 4.41.,950 30,954,509 • oL411.5I1 .1.1.1.1. .vase alleWeel .ecllltlea IAH.115 ill ll).11. i5.019.all ]J0..055 3.916.1IS 6.051..0a 4.BI1.611 711...1 S.U5.1I. co.1ia.16. 51.1]1.." .-.,al vlast .a. Wmmi.c,. ti- facilities 150.63. 23.509,070 04.111,31. ].10.01 ).99..665 6.0]O.l]l 4.7.1.11. 114.11. 1.069J91 79.SO.5tl 16.S.S.Mt cone-tlm in progress I at, 21 499 777 J1 4l]144 S.S1SSli _1J11.417 Met p..artY, plant an. eryl.mM 79,540,121 )11.111.033 ]90.609.514 61.044.1e1 ]..906.560 q.O44.0O 65.e01..19 9.911.465 65.916.010 1.019.420.150 911..91.i60 lama .Ccm,tated OeprealMton20 107 996 11223,969 1.41241624 3D9.771t6.141.1L 1.EOL402 11191.971 .at property. plane and e0uIgnore ll6.e 210.1cl Ila 1D.910.4f3 i9.fil.li3 49�099 70B �.1011l0 91164.091 ..... ..... price o [ book value acqu l red .. - - 14.717.11e 14.1.1,12. SS.315.M1 Other a at, less mecuelload marel..iim t re .-10Y1L _...➢.. a _16L631 �L19! �1L160 Met ....ta 1+ea_I ne1.M6. 4o..lm. .1..1.141 61.16E 091 11.93LU1 3Y.Y41.666 }1S163Y6 1w u.o5 a.fae.9a I.. .ttwpnnrina Wanted... ...lien' mapp e. 34 tpp!}L 9Rlllfl3pp OIBL9IRH M OR6Fp0 WOM'r [artGinlrg ealanee Meat ICmtlnuMl June 30. 2994 FIM tmpera[ive lb[a la Lo[ Oune l0. 19 y) Ole[[Ict District District District District District District Dl.clicc District sb...6 xn a po. ] tlD._13 Me_ 1f De. 1a 2996 1991 cn,rent 11a01LLtlea Wys le Lr® ent e N Meaun. WyaDle $ 6U.06] 1,176.119 l,]}L O6 1Jr. r.601 306.656 111p01 }O.)96 39.126 in ]M.16] 1.IM 141 S,O0.l9 wed expanses 500.96} 1.660.D6 1.[l).is. Is 30..27 6I S.SB] 9)0.9)1 1L.... 66.819 AB.11i S..&1 N0 591.681 Depoeflf �31 �.i6. �96 JL453 Toni current ueeufti e. Wy.ble La Current rrent ace.is �]2.151 �6.sun �6LY.l tnenest ]deL]mie. e,uri. erm restrict.. e. Reten[fine "ruble 60.006 205.961 21l.M 1]5,10] 36,171 I.5.00t IM 1B5 6.606 6.767 I.ill.0s. Inte vest payable 955.09 2.308,079 3.OIS.015 ]S B.S19 131.9.1 106.95a .11 65.115 6.191.12. 9..W lil DODoe1[a 9.151 56.U9 LpD 1...... - IL630 306.511 T0.] 2 561 5.i61 PN t0 et M1e[Metric's - J.O01.3)5 - - - 1.H60.191 - B19.)81 ].I SB.Hl9 p.96 p.350 8.916.]]] <LW end juegsnl. Payable. current central Wrtlan 19.A6 .."J. 90.SB3 11.01] 15.605 ]],l5) 16.909 ].095 10.1}9 }SO.169 N6.p19 obllgetlm "'do peyebl B. Current porrim - - - ca rrS 3fnRe oL pas it 1p.c mn. cut ...t Inr[lm 1.]i1.001 IJ06.]Ol 3.95].IY 6)6.690 )S B.681 659.761 510.995 5,)00 16.000 "I'll 000 11.91S.B00 Obi)[..... .sure [ epurc0e.. gre 2 Cesi 14 s In rural current llebiline. ]owyarle rw[ti se re ensure .Lans.nlJ S.➢9f.]2410 963 2743SSL➢65 1S90.77Il [mg ten liabilities: Cmpenae[sd eDeeneee inl.]O 90;iR 9U.6D ]06 ill.". ]H..1B 6.0)0 85.918 LOSH.IDB 2.]6].4s0 .1.:I.d ernp neri. Islele I..]3l 1.110,2.. 1.794.079 211,nS9 111.121 5}].006 lA.]B6 ...9.1 U..... 5,911.21. tJal- aM ]W9mencs Wyaele. n[ porilm S1.H. 11,15H 1,.. 2,092 1.965 ..513 1.591 550 3.BY p..HS 669,95. rs.n.la rersserlsi WWr 9.915.000 6.1.0.000 15.R5.000 1.110,000 3.550.000 ;0.0,000 3,205,000 ....... 1...,..0. 50.000.000 - sen.tel vellganm ne ee payable. sesucirrent section Dercifiturns oL WalclWCiOn. v! WRlon net oI elHemn[ 52,1J0.]Bl 137,426,341 121.D1.494 33.604,15B 17.589,007 28.503.250 I6,OI5,16S 130,630 L.M.O. 4I7.376,937 .11,500J30 rotel I.,.t - liW)Ilclee 57,577 701 196 627 674l.e.l 25 729.011 20.5]$.268 29 896 ISO ....2.1 rule. ilab1l1t10s 70 lil 919 1 30,306 247 26,291,091 39.714ISfl 1SY6S1D 1 9.M eOultY: Omtr(Nte. c.pitel ..]]5.40 ]6.U0.5)1 3. JM.., li,l)H.BIB 4.151..]l I..190.116 11.666.].9 1.1WB1. 74.372,143 IB0.09].9]H 1]S.U6JOl Recalmd n[n)vge Uc-lated deilcicl 13,314 940190,490. 45.199.969 20.111.9ll AS 997392 16591.➢i1 rOtO L.nd .11ry 39,092 193 ] 219,49A.953 y142,,691 ]yyyy5p .........1 11.➢96.see Coalcmvt0 en. cwclMencle0 IDral 1110111tiee aM fund mul[Y B10B a 23.93f.91f 61..61.9l2 9l.!]9.l99 1L991.996 ]9.a+e _ _ HeB anwg in9 1Mepnnnnt sue ltav report. 35 tvmer .umY1a•Dle9vrn a.wa.rnv59. Om4lninq putwm Oe vevmwp. 6pns eM mewe In btelne0 Ymlge Nt too N005 June J0. .o ytlw Ol. ch. 0 YItF COetl Sbb ]e[ t Y [ Rod.dune District District District District District District District District District 1 mc. 9p.--6 so I YD.,.11 YorlD tl0._11 19P1 199D Operetly r peNlce cFeryee i11i0).St9 A.]91.LS ]].IlS.119 ].BO.Sl9 I.SO..., LlU.Of ].II}.]OS IIO.Sm is 10.901.03 19 JOL]BS pewit cod 1....oft. fore 1W5p! �.bli row wntlnp nwme ]e.] I] . yySyyyl Syyy]p yy.pp_ Doctoring[nr.... o[Fm than Oepnc w.. .M w[t1.woo: Seledes eM nmatlte 1]B.)ll 1.210.212 b1 J]l 291.I43 1].]t] 9]L 1]I 1OL I.. I.90 4.,714 ..110.191 V[Ill[lae - M.711 .11..1. 11.]11 9.9Q 11.1.1 87.075 11.M ALBU .I4..12 Npl1v - 2.1e1 .11,111 "1 - .11 li - ]11.)]. 15..95I w r.orl-CULL .el t... I91.029 Nl.11. 71.171 SL0]I 111..1. 6.it, U.1B1 I19.SO1 l.fOI J.O l.Q].A. DlrectmP for. 9...f 11.15. ]5.M 5."I "ill is.14l ..521 L1.9 9.B99 103.104 10].1)3 1-crl m0 mini., ]O t.IO 1..1. ]l0 Us 709 1.1 .11 411 5.1.1 1.990 v.p.lr. .M sai.t.Mnt. 1..11 4s..tO 45.0.1 ..1.10] .9.191 ...... ]J...S SB.901 ....lis 91].]1t i01nt epntlM e[pn.. .11...tlm ..O9.t9. 14.0.1.11. 11.056.]l. 1.111.348 2,110a21 4.O1...7. 1.]19.1i1 441,004 111..1. 4].9)4.I94 ...Stl. is OtFe[ �.ISD J.OJ1 JY.SlL 1 r.i norstlo, arywo .char '....p..U.tim m1 wcli... 0n IIA93 3171..9w_ 3.SIp.fJ3 ].199.}li .115.p3p_ OpntLg Incur It.eq bfero ..pn[lml.n .M wrtl[eH0 1.....7.1 ..I]].]U 1.905..05 4dU.N] 1.]D In 91t..A N6."1 ].4.991 11.].0.51i1 21.it..]N 11.121.1)] .p[..I.tl.n an [mtrib re. !multi.. 15.B11 - - - 10.011 15.01J D.p[%Lrlm m .Ner lerilitb. ]aO1.N. is.111. is so.11. 919.5]. 91I.09 I.SOS.001 ].00}.B]) .]9.S.] ].01..5. )].140.147 21.194.920 sossfi.rtlm so ah.c ...OG U.535 W.11. 1...01 11,... MM is.11. 21.21. "1 757 41..519 2.0]].110 lm[rt.stlm of moo.. W[eF.se price over tcor -I-m .rool-d onu opB...in Imm I... e 1 Jpe.Sle JN.10 }J]O.tlpy 1 DID 9901 Ic.numwl c.. ..rmp.min9 ic,ewn.ent .Wirer.• r port. 36 oemfr LJmn® DSP9RSm or 09avef tVOff mesteDi" ftacce-c m v Sachems, ea0 crashes In am.'. later". Ittotlnoe0l M Por tEe rea[ 6MM lone l0: "Is site Coysntlw lb[als for to. rest fo0e0 lone S0, 199) merrier District District Obtrict District District District District District m. l pees be. s Ra. + Re xr re, 1, N._tf 1441 .e91 Roe-open'I" r •noe, Pr.arty cam. f 5.159.11t 5.560.414 I.1.. 3.460.061 1d02.1.1 5e7 - )S.BS1..11 11.05).691 Interest a. .a I..M.m. to,.1.e03 ].OB1.669 1.670.001 ).111.1.7 2.111,1m OSa.mI ]D,p9 33.226.317 31.369.a69 fe0.r.1 am arate.abet revenm Other 16.202 S.S$IL}11 —{1L19P recal ease-cpenmng 11,117 -1- M 3.d61.e65 J.629.611 3.a..al IA17,621 ach-cm-riy .meuea: i merest 1.116,the 6. l..I. I.1.1.m9 .11.5m IM 9]6 M2. 9..1. ar. 36.961.51t 1I.199.a.. .her 1...71 1.1 at 226.161 rant see.epar.tLg a mnm. .16.163 1.S1L]2P 761179 _2L➢91 (mans lima] before a aorJe.r1 lm. se .ecle,alemanc or met Is is]6lS 1,IM..I is.546.Ts 1.910.e.a 5.554.1.9 ..160.Iae 3.633.738 Llmllcl IS.S6I,5001 .0.331.... 37,411.art Dares".'me, Ioss ea eaiy lament of 6.m bet I— Iie..l 60 s.m5 9.19..81) 1].350.fI1 3,122.109 2,313,543 1.519.110 l.].O.mO I.M5.1161 IS.50.5101 )a.1m.6n )1.016.660 Roe eepreclatlma t.,"a t.m relstee to �trim[. —Pic-1 �6.IlI2 pet Increase (decrease, le -rate. p.rnlm. Iaemnvlec. meets) 6m.m5 9.19..8]l 13,250.733 111.11m 2,333,941 3..11.1M 1.14O.m0 1.2.5.963 (2,909.0711 35.040,46. 11.1.1,443 Rhcelmd earnings Ihcavwmred deficit). emien1n9 of Year 101 099.4aO IRIAIIA75i2.y6yj6p 20 079 530 71.206J25 49 641.362 9 70L146 95 154,0221M7,676.792 555.8 ratalaed eernlrye (ace-elac. meldtl, hes of Yea r1.1 e. mme,awle, Smepe.ene sedir.r.. mmr�- 37 COp1}x m),ini rz0A pxcent o[ Cash NWl'P par a M rag 8 Flows Me at gonad OUM )0. .its Cw@ae slue xn[e le [a[ [M Yeac BMwOd,lme )0. 59U District District District District District District District District Oi.rrirr Dr, I ho I no • so 9 tlo. c x^. I N^ II xn. f• tiv...l1 1911 1g41 Cash etas fr=Orating activities: .1 re.n p—I.. I...d) by Operation. Cece 'I-. fr...Vic. I'...cin Mivmies: oeeads I—pcopar, [u 3,159,]]6 9...1.all 13.I".III 3,568,as. 1,314.233 1.660,06] 3.111,1.9 111 - 31,897,496 .1.,1.1., OMer non-operating revewe (saps...1. MC Pat cash Provided Oy non- ,,pill. financing aeriVi[Les Caen [1Ma f[M l...a w replant and vYud finenCin9 activities, Addf[loM to property, plan[ aM asui,.t 1].Q].Oa 91 11]..54.SO1 10.3p.1401 0..86.1651 1531,4761 (],.51.]30) (4,564.306) 13,253,)831 15.549.6001 (40,936.8361 (61,1]3.0551 Insolent Paid, n t of Bmun[a caP1[a11[ed a (2.]6].100 b.00a,1301 16.956.9991 11.50]..031 165.,9161 11.191.1601 Il.l l].e981 W.3V) (91,124) 121,006,2 161 I17.286,4851 Principal pay.ente an co[tlfl case, of Participation I10.405.0901 (12.125.657) (6.S34.6401 II.964.5271 15,167,3791 12,67915.11 I5.4401 132.000) 454,925,866) (155.991.]45) Principal payments an .-do - - - - - 125.000, - - I1 AM 115.000) oeeae f m isuance of [uWle ewea[ieal Wpar 41925,000 I'll..,... 15,155.000 1.]30.000 1.550.000 3.640,000 1.305.000 460,000 4,405.000 5I,... 000 - proceeds from issuance of MRi[loces of Wt[idpa[Son 1.141.11. 9.4.9.>B1 5.9591172 1.636.s61 1,1.1.411 a4.4l0.359 356.863.31] Pncsm. fro.Capita cons[6McIW9 Nec .... P—ided lased nyl .,it.. eon rn letm 'wnan9 aalv'tie. u.. 1 Co.. non. I— fM rIng .a lrlsl e.: Inrroase in lnves[men[a IS,013,5351 (15,621,2971 115.715.3311 11.735,4901 42J0).014) I4.14S.414) I).0]1.9551 1530,0001 13.170.Oa01 151.606,9361 (30,901,0121 r, [acafvtd 3.a1;1)1 9.63011I5 9,6g1,0]] 1.981.588 l.11 11 3.639.n00 8.392,452 ell,fll )65.)9s 32.091.420 21,1.,19. Inc[es9e In oalWnon under reve[M rep reM.. ,--at 22 738,217 - Mt Me.provided W investing [[lvl[es Ne[ lvc[uea IdeC[0ual In con. !M Os. pal va lance ).589.111 19.90.e]1 21.15]..Of 5.6.8.94] 4,27..251 1.a0a.619 ].U.,166 ]0,161 1l3.444 64,090,]50 121,237,544 Cs.o son can.aqulvalanM. Mglnnlp Or Or 31A04 21G 125 411,540 48 990 294 37 402 9631 Cesh sod cos1h pulralen08, and Of .at P,a 36.058., it.) Itwtiwedl 66. ecconpnrying iMspaMan[ auditors' repo[[. 38 [ rf- Dx m W DIIMUB CWR9Y Cambng; Stot "hM of Comb Floss IcenuMeel for I. Is eneee duns 3v, 1v q 6 kith cg •r•t ch Teteb t0[ tM YI- 9MpI OUM I.. 199) D»[rlet District District District District District Olrtel<t District District M. I I I Ins. l M. 9 M. 6 M. f B^ +e tlB...le w. 1. ,gee 1991 Con ]lava Iron egntlM ee[IYl[lee: Opr{Ling income II MeI 9 (111,16.1 U.f]bf41) Ib lb,flll ....UB ]fSa OB IE.656.1511 Il.fl9.]l01 1»O.f e01 N.Sfa.f]]) 111.BE0,1Ee1 10,0]O,f 001 "..I-nv M Mello apeeselM loco.. (ln.e) t Mt mean provided by ap•r.[IMe, wre-f [Ins ].]93.B6B 10.599.910 a.9e6.39B 915.9If ...... 1,900,016 1.M1.8E3 421,542 1.61.1 Sm 1..1.Sid if.i69.991 moorci.:IlM .1.444 1.1,179 100.m11 ]9.680 I6,f 11 ]f.l6B 23.21, Ill 1".." 1..71.2.. l,fe0,119 ..n9•. in . end IIOMI»e, M.le.0 uncw.e.l I. ....unto Is cmlvse1 19Lloll OnS.+vI IS1EJ10 le.9l)1 1M.7m1 191 J1{I Is6 alai Ile,I.,) Ill,s»I Dsmdaml ❑.411.0a41 D.<[on Iincwual in duv Oran ntnee Dl e[elc[m » )0, - 12.179.690) ).011.191 1.39.001 If9.4011 uMwa•mr in no ere. 3. e[Mr gmu.nt.l .gencl0• 1]13.SL1 f]».6861 I10.10f1 1]f.M51 I1]606 31 1.9.f101 1139.»91 Will I190.f01 U.){e.Of[I 1f0.190 I Cm<rp.ee 1noe0sU In o[na[ ecml v{Dip. f6m,Of0 ».1}3 19L 61f) 60].4)0 6A.116 1A,666 EB6.171 I.199 19 BB.i101 »aJa IIO B.L91 pcwen Ilncneol In lnwn[e[Imm IS S.I601 I1 BS.Si II Il SB,6001 41,724) M.".) U9.loll I».11.1 19.9611 U..le sl 0a6.62il I11L 119) Mrr..so unar...a In prmwie ens ....r eoeo N{.o.v Il.o.9u1 uml.mp Ill.ml U).)UI M.7m1 I».OD bJ.al Ue.n91 161E u11 1m.1.1. Mmnue IIM...... In or If lO,le Jl Ii T.1L1 1)»..Oel 1]Sl.iNl Moll 106.0061 169.3931 110.3611 ISl.3Bll I1.NS.a]41 10wrauel I. • wno I—— <C vrY•nle 11».1931 )90.]Bl fSy)T I]]J09 O].SMI (711.1111 Il6].091 Il l.ffa If O.9901 IO5,0601 h.ff..f ill mrlpne 1MM...e, m •..rn.d mrpmnme. m50..00 I.IBl,ll6 L»Lll. I].9311 ) I,71m B9f.336 OL91. Bo.011 }91.10, 111.1..1. I59.563 Incraeee Id.crmem.l In dmpaml[m LSII I10.061 11111. 9I1 1.]96 1.)OS J91 96 Sl,9fi ]0) L1p.Ofi 12459.118) mcr..w me<r.wel in Mpo.». pY•nle 9.]Sl 11.119 1.6]] 109.910 }5.10 f.511 270.ffl 561 OS.IBE mmw..e memnne, I. sue to Its Ol m[[lcU IIJ S.ff fl 1361.9]41 IL OU..BfI 1306.O211 S,S61f11 16f B,9061 11.110103 S99.IU SI.a) p Idoraual In ant len. WYse» IISS.SIII Il]].9601 IISE.a'l91 »i JfO IS1.0.31 11.141 lH.9M If."" If{.6M1 II09.3091 .3.714 Inere Is Idm<reeol In CPpineat" •namcem 1O.196 180.511 .4,111 0.1031 IO.IE9 37.20E 19.11e 3,996 Ip.O01 LO, 's S47,611 IDmrpsee moor...., I. Mhrr00 eempm4tl en pya0ll 121,117 412.302 181.11] 41,754 WIN II S.fIO .0.40] 11.09 ]9.e19 1.E]6.Emf 1,it l.ey lot :lot leeoros.I In Cltlne ens )Udgmnt. poll. lu,eaa I1R.6i 11 (103..»I 121.I.Il 1)S.011l M."', Ill.11]I b.f901 Wil" 110,113) IS19.1951 Inc.... (do.-...) in aee.rrw Mt no p-id.d DY able motion. o.ln... _ ..".1 1, , ens .<mmpe,n\M SMmwndpat auditors- r.pert. 39 Lf I � .r J LI (THIS PADS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK) f u U IJ 1.1 U ♦0 r r r Statistical Section Fiscal Year 1993-94 C O .. U N to U Z N 40 N J COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Expenses by Type l+ (Dollars In Thousands) w Last Ten Fiscal Years W JOperating ill Non-Operating Fiscal Personal Naint. Depr, A Total Interest Total Year Services Util. A Other Am=.t_ Oper. Expense Other Npn_Oper. �- 1984-SS $10,259 $5,118 $7,418 $10,837 $33,632 $960 $176 $1,136 1985-86 11,506 5,128 9,881 11,060 37,575 718 922 1,640 r 1986-87 12,935 5,418 12,845 21,140 42,338 9,592 1,308 10,900 J - 1987-88 15,752 4,956 16,910 13,164 50,782 6,964 374 7,338 1988-89 25,735 5,580 19,810 14,988 56,113 3,531 494 4,025 1989-90 19,170 5,578 19,224 17,726 61,698 9,368 1,048 10,416 V 1990-91 24,170 5,983 20,711 23,520 73,884 9,654 1,822 11,476 1991-92 26,757 5,920 20,416 23,346 76,439 11,825 2,405 14,230 2992-93 28,924 7,235 21,677 27,950 85,786 11,799 1,250 13,049 d 1993-94 30,248 9,589 20,237 33,988 89,062 16,964 2,414 19,378 !d (1) - The individual cost components include a breakdown of the joint b operating expenses, which, for 1992-93 and 1993-94, were as follows: a� Fiscal Personal Maint. Depr. 6 Total Year Services Util. 6 Other nmmo tt Op.r. k1 1992-93 $24,660 6,740 18,923 - 50,323 1993-94 26,077 4,042 17,508 - 47,627 Source: County Sanitation Diatricts- Accounting Division 11 41 y COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTS Estimated Populations of Cities and Unincorporated Areas Served by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 711 June 30, 1994 �1fj Yl city Ponulatien City ERRMIAUS n Anaheim 290,700 Los Alamitos 12,150 Brea 34,600 Newport Beach 69,300 Buena Park 72,900 Orange 118,000 Costa Mesa 302,400 Placentia 44,100 Cypress 46,000 Santa Ana 310,400 1 Fountain Valley 55,000 Seal Beach 26,050 M Fullerton 121,500 Stanton 32,250 Garden Grove 151,800 Tustin 59,800 Huntington Beach 189,200 Villa Park 6,425 �l Irvine 121,200 Westminster 81,600 Y La Habra 54,200 Yorba Linda 57,400 La Palma 25,700 4 23 Cities Subtotal 2,072,575 Y Unincorporated 168,100 YYY„ill Total 2,240,675 qII I1� VAI y L Source: Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance. [ I 52 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANOR COUNTY Expenses by Type (Dollars In Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Yearn w Ooaratina (11 Non-OeeraGlnq Fiscal Personal Maint. Depr. & Total Interest Total Xm= Services Dti1. & ether Am2Xj- Oper. )DNADSL 2tha= Non-Oner. r 1994-85 $10,259 $5,11B $7,419 $10,837 $33,632 $960 $176 $1,136 1985-66 11,506 5,128 9,881 11,060 37,575 718 922 1,640 r 1986-87 12,935 5,418 12,845 11,140 42,338 9,592 1,308 20,900 1987-88 15,752 4,956 16,910 13,164 50,782 6,964 374 7,338 1988-89 15,735 5,580 19,820 14,988 56,113 3,531 494 4,025 r 1989-90 19,170 5,578 19,224 17,726 61,698 9,368 1,048 10,426 r 1990-91 24,170 5,483 20,711 23,520 73,884 9,654 1,822 11,476 2991-92 26,757 5,920 20,416 23,346 76,439 11,825 2,405 14,230 r - 1992-93 28,924 7,235 21,677 27,950 85,786 11,799 1,250 13,049 1993-94 30,248 4,589 20,237 33,988 89,062 16,964 2,414 19,378 (1) - The individual cost components include a breakdown of the joint operating expenses, which, for 1992-93 and 1993-94, were as follows: r Fiscal Personal Maint. Depr. & Total XC = ce✓vi�ea Dtil. & Other Antort. Qn,r,- m 1992-93 $24,660 6,740 18,923 - 50,323 1993-94 26,077 4,042 17,508 - 47,627 Source: County Sanitation Districts' Accounting Division r 41 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY V ReVMUea and Contributed Capital by Source (Dollars In Thousands) ) +6: Last Ten Fiscal Years V aeee�tlnv lesmue Y®-eneretlnv Heeweue 22muLw. Can1t" I Petfit Pl4sul 1I_II Pisesl eve. 6 Issp. P1rop. hp. 6 out. IC6L M9 YHHH 2th8r Taxes, AIHCCH ILL. gxa= RLA9r 1984-05 $9,000 $4,005 $089 $19,532 369 $19,057 $140 $2,438 $(75) 1505-86 1,019 6,070 830 20.026 20,251 18,490 118 953 (v5) 1986-07 6,302 5,967 1,090 24,449 1,165 26,261 99 2,2B2 39.969 1980-88 9,418 6,299 1,349 27,368 2.009 24,823 1 640 1,986 L 2988-89 12,995 16,669 11919 20,760 324 22.091 $65 5,238 (033) 2909-90 23,009 1,242 - 31.222 2,242 18,993 2,030 1,889 94,132 y 1990-92 39,712 7,429 - 33,395 1,172 17,279 64 3,496 15,963 1991-92 56,155 322 - 34.053 1,615 22,593 2,053 5,499 12,896 ~ 1992-93 69,569 456 - 31,054 2,228 20,569 18 1,609 91486 b 1993-99 70,908 540 - 32,858 - 33,22E - 6,450 13,471 Ad 60 V 1 Source: County Sanitation Districts Accounting DiviSion L L 42 ® COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Property Tax Levies and Collections (Dollars In Thousands) . . Last Ten Fiscal Years r a oc a of w' xntal Current Bezemt Dlina. xntal Total Tax O/o Celina. Via." T. xm of 1a T. Tat Colleet. Celina. Tana. to XNAL hm Collect, Collect. Cnil.r ia-L= Downs xwr 3 m 1989-85 $31.084 $19,J21 93.54% $ JSJ $20.4]6 96.944 $ 734 1.43a 1985-86 23,585 22,146 93.90 J82 22,928 97.21 006 3.42 b 1906-87 26,267 25,054 95.38 1,013 26,067 99.24 993 3.78 1987-88 29,285 24,41E 92.90 665 25,283 96.19 1,649 6.27 w _ . 1990-09 34,118 32.616 96.18 942 33,758 90.94 981 2.88 r 1909-90 47,900 45,024 94.00 729 45,753 95.52 2,532 5.29 2990-91 02,180 68,841 95.37 645 69,606 96.54 2,994 3.04 W 1991-92 85.172 99,329 93.14 1,637 00,966 95.06 5,067 5.95 1992-93 92,926 86,511 93.10 21152 88,663 95.41 51465 5.88 W 1993-94 92,729 68,335 95.26 5,722 94,057 101.43 3,255 3.51 b r ,af N Source: Orange County Auditor-Controller's Office. m 43 s i V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANOB COUNTY V Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property (Dollars In Millions) Y Last Tea Fiscal Years u Ratio of 8ecwrwd Prwwarty SRIBOcerwd Prnnwrtva Total L estimated Estimated Estimated Assessed Fiscal Assessed Actual Assessed Actual Assessed Actual to Bat. Les value VAlEa value value Value value value W 1984-85 $ 58,920 $ 58,820 $2,728 $2,728 $ 61,548 $ 61,548 loot 1985-86 64,263 64,263 2,620 2,620 66,SB3 66,883 100 1986-87 76,969 76,969 2,987 2,987 79,956 79,956 100 + 1987-88 83,897 83,897 3,290 3,290 87,187 87,187 100 1 V 1988-89 88,632 88,632 3,464 3,464 92,096 92,096 100 1989-90 98,750 98,750 4,422 4,422 103,172 103,172 100 1990-91 109,048 109,048 3,575 3,575 112,623 112,623 100 4d 1991-92 116,450 116,450 4,473 4,473 120,923 120,923 100 1992-93 122,510 122,510 4,687 4,687 127,197 127,197 100 L 1993-94 124,016 124,016 3,963 3,963 127,979 127,979 100 L I d L Source: Orange County Auditor-Controller's Office. L 44 'iI r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANOS COUNTY Property Tax Rates - Direct and Overlapping Governments last Ten Fiscal Years r r..e.n x SAH!_BY S4HS=9E 198E=82 1482-2fi SYOB=02 1419J11 119P.:53 34P3=93 14SJ91 149i:u a ie it L. 1.00000 1.00000 I.oO000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 1.00000 r orange county No. 1 -_ Band IFOt Sued - 1951 0.00196 0.00154 0.00199 0-00139 0.00121 0.00024 - - - - orange county No. 3 Bond I" f - 2951 - - - 0.00521 0.00210 0.00039 - - - - Orange County No. 5 r Bend I68 Fund - 19SI 0.00039 0.00037 0-00041 0.00034 0.00031 0.00041 - - - - Orange county No. 6 Sand I68 Fund - 1951 0.00134 0.00081 0.00044 - - - - - - - b Ora Je County No. 11 B0ed 25R Fund - 1951 0.00022 0.00023 0.00030 0.00019 0,00017 0.00008 - - - eond I&R Fund - 1958 000092 0,00075 0 G0140 0 00076 0 QGGS1 0,00021 9�99015 0 00012 9.89911 9.99919 Total 1.00495 1.88328 S.On96n 1.00780 1.08438 1.00133 1..88815 16UIU 1.00013 1.na919 b V �Y C b Source: County Of Orange Auditor-Controller's Office. r 45 r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANOS COUNTY V Principal Deere For the Year Ended June 30, 1994 V Percentage of Total Service 1 URRK Service, Chareee Charge Revenues L 1. Kimberly Clark $ 476,845 0.674 y 2. Seven-up Bottling 383,803 0.54 3. Adorh Farms 318,221 0.45 Yak 4. Beatrice/Hunt-Wesson 279,671 0.39 1 S. Anaheim Citrus 192,064 0.27 L 6. Favorite Foods 180,972 0.26 N 7. Shell Nester, E 6 P 176,180 0.25 S. Sundor Brands 126,992 0.18 9. Coca-Cola Foods 126,954 0.18 V 10. Disneyland 119,335 0.17 del Total $2,381,035 3.36% l r' wi V v L Source: County Sanitation Districts' Accounting Division L 46 m COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Ratio of Annual Debt Service for Bonded Debt to Total Expenses ,. (Dollars In Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years r Total Ratio of Debt Operating Service to EEpeaeas Total e Fiscal Total Debt Exclusive of Operating x2nl Esincipal Interest Service Danr. 4 Amert. ZEReamm. 1984-85 $ 1,566 $ 301 $1,867 $22,796 8.196 1985-86 1,581 237 1,818 26,516 6.86 1986-87 1,607 9,592 11,199 31,198 33.90 1987-88 2,929 6,964 9,893 37,618 26.30 r 1988-89 3,002 3,531 6,533 41,125 15.89 1989-90 2,593 9,368 11,961 43,972 27.20 1990-91 2,396 9,654 12,050 50,363 23.93 w 1991-92 3,335 11,825 15,160 53,091 28.55 "+ 1992-93 6,075 11,799 17,874 54,096 33.04 1993-94 11,990 16,964 28,954 50,280 57.59 ea s a Le Source: County Sanitation Districts' ACCennting Division r 47 r I ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGS COUNTY Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt June 30, 1994 1993-94 Assessed Valuation (Land 6 Improvements Only) : $115,611,401,445 (after deducting $12,366,969,719 redevelopment tax allocation increment) n IRRLT TNn OVE9teppian BOND® = (Based On redevelopment adjusted all property assessed valuation of $121,009,006,066): U t nonlirshle Debt 6/30/94 Orange County 75.769% $ 594,787 Orange County general Fund Obligations 75.069 226,15T,016 Orange County Transit District Authority 75.769 is,98D,259 ' Orange County Flood Control ➢istrict 75.746 2,658,937 MOtrOpOlitan Water District of Southern California 15.055 90,518,963 Coast Community College District Certificate. of Participation 99.203 15,485,592 A Saddleback Community College District Certificates of Participation 34.306 9,336,370 Srea-Olinda Unified School District Certificates Of Participation 98.059 38,162,723 Irvine Unified School District 99.994 12,019,232 Santa Ana Unified School District and Certificates of Participation 100. 22,900,000 Orange Unified School District Certificates of Participation 95.764 12,281,T33 I } Other School Districts and School Authorities Various 26,493,433 �a City of Anaheim 98.969 9,951,333 City of Anaheim General Fund Obligation. 98.969 269,354,512 City Of Coats Mesa and General Fund Obligations 100. 35,725,000 L�City of Huntington Beach and General Fund Obligations 99.975 50,266,193 City of Irvine 100. 8,790,000 City of Irvine General Fund Obligations 100. 88,0801000 City of Santa Ana general Food Obligations 100. 135,629,457 Other Cities and City Authorities Various 122,846,673 V Orange County Sanitation District. and Certificates of Participation 100. 428,105,000 Irvine Batch Water District Certificates of Participation 99.315 58,989,000 Irvine Ranch Water District Improvement Districts Various 313,356,313 Orange County Water District Certificate. of Participation 99.100 206,593,700 Municipal Water District of Orange County Water Facilities Corporation 73.336 67,557,123 Other Water Districts Various 22,739,443 Orange County Assessment Districts 100. 171,067,012 City Of Irvine 1915 Act Bonds 100. 206,744,083 City Of Tustin 1915 Act Bonds 100. 120,650,891 Other City 191S Act Bonds Various 34,033,643 City Of Anaheim Community Facilities Districts Various 24,159,685 Irvine Unified School District Community Facilities District 486-1 99.995 35,210,239 Orange County Community Facilities District 089-4 96.937 61,287,726 City of Placentia Community Facilities District p85-1 IOD. 24,935,000 Other Community Facilities Districts Various 74,933,756 Other Special Districts Various 6.41D.2D9 ry " TOTAL GROSS DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING BONDED DEBT 3,057,417,742 (1) 16d Iass:O. C. Transit District Authority (804 self-supporting) 12,789,807 0. C. Water District Certificates of Participation (100% self-supporting) 206,593,700 City of Anaheim self-supporting obligations 213,242,949 MNDOC Water Facilities Corporation )10D4 self-aupporting) 67,557,123 Other Self-supporting obligations s +o+ 4n6 TOTAL NET DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING BONDED DEBT 52.ssD.930.'15v I (1) excludes tax and revenue anticipation notes, revenue, mortgage revenue and tax allocation bonds and non- bonded capital lease obligations. Ratios to assessed Valuation: land a Imnr. A11 Prnnerry Direct Debt ($428,105,000) 0.37% 0.35t Total Grose Debt 2.64% 2.534 Total Not Debt 2.21t 2.21t STATE SCHOOL BULMING AID REPAYABLE AS OF 6/30/94: $39,395,669 1W1 Source: California Municipal StatiatiCS L 46 >J 4V d COOMY SANITATION DIBYMICTS OF ORAROR COUNTY Bond Coverage (Dollars In Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years r Direct Operating Net Revenue .. Fiscal gross Expenses Avail. For Debt awrviae awvuirementa xnm Revenue fl) (2) Daht Sezviee EximaiNal IDtereet ypru c9maiags m 1984-85 $ 56,307 $22,796 $33,511 $ 11566 $ 301 $ 1,667 18 1985-86 77,348 26,516 50,832 1,581 237 1,018 28 1986-87 67,614 31,198 36,416 1,607 9,592 11,199 3 r 1987-88 70,916 37,618 33,298 2,929 6,964 9,893 3 1988-89 88,649 41,125 47,524 3,002 3,531 6,533 7 r 1989-90 79,563 43,972 35,591 2,593 9,368 11,961 3 b 1990-91 102,548 50,363 52,185 2.396 9,654 12,050 4 1991-92 122,489 53,091 69,398 3,335 11,825 15,160 5 ti 1992-93 132,573 54,096 78,477 6,075 11,799 17,879 4 1993-94 143,962 50,280 93,702 11,990 16,964 28,954 3 (1)- Including non-operating revenues. r (2)- Exclusive of Depreciation and amortization. 4 Source: County Sanitation Districts' Accounting Division rs 49 i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY y' Demograhic Statistics Covering The Entire County of Orange (1) Last Ten Fiscal Years �y V (2) (3) (4) 1 Population Median (2) Public School (5) L•' Fiscal Estimates Family Median Enrollment Unemployment Ysal I+n' ThhMMa modal Income An 12n Tkouaandwl Hats h 1984-85 2,111 $39,941 31.1 330 4.4t 1985-86 2,151 41,537 31.5 337 4.01, li 1986-87 2,195 43,264 32.0 338 3.3% Y� 1987-88 2,239 45,176 32.4 345 3.0% 1988-89 2,280 49,916 32.8 354 3.14 2989-90 2,326 53,000 33.2 368 2.9% 1990-91 2,411 56,380 30.4 385 4.84 1991-92 2,512 56,346 30.4 393 4.86 V 1992-93 2,557 54,380 30.4 400 6.7% 1993-94 2,597 54,413 32.6 402 5.8% 1W Y Notes and Data Sources: W (1) - The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County services 970 square miles, or 59% out of the total 799 square miles that make up the boundries of the County of Orange. V (2)- Data Source- Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance. (3) - Data Source- "The Chapman College Economic 6 Business Review-' 4� (estimates) . 4y (4) - Data Source- Orange County Department of Education. (5) - Data Source- Orange County Employment Department. V L 50 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Property Value, Construction and Bank Deposits Covering The Entire County of Orange (1) (Dollars In Thousands) Last Ten Fiscal Years Non- Assessed Reaidential Residential prnnarx yAlnw121 [_Ceawtr. 131 Ceaatrection(3) Total weak Fiscal calendar No. of conatr. Deposits XAAM Yale, YBGL V.I., twits V.I-, Velew111 13.41 1984-85 $85,727,196 1985 $1,251,776 18,906 $1,421,776 $2,673,552 $12,924,370 1985-86 94,298,962 1986 1,483,24D 23,676 11795,095 3,278,335 14,468,671 1906-87 103,944,930 2987 1,491,420 23,062 1,788,598 3,280,018 16,167,780 r 1987-88 113,886,095 1988 1,324,186 20,522 1,779,847 3,104,033 18,003,603 1988-69 125,682,613 1989 1,707,485 24,056 2,279,515 3,987,000 19,653,278 1989-90 141,941,723 1990 2,472,070 14,849 1,897,324 3,369,394 18,555,165 r 1990-91 158,342,197 1991 963,972 8,193 1,041,641 2,005,613 19,687,437 1991-92 170,151,136 1992 704,135 7,698 1,297,452 2,001,587 27,223,764 1992-93 178,534,134 1993 520,214 6,122 1,063,565 1,583,779 22,637,820 s 1993-94 178,761,413 1994 523,480 7,333 1,338,519 1,861,999 24,925,640 ti r Data Sources: a (1)- The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County services 970 square miles, or 59% out of the total 799 square miles that make up the e, boundaries of the County of Orange. (2) - Orange County Auditor-Controller. (3) - "The Chapman College Economic S Business Review--. All amounts shown u for 1994 are forecasted. (4) - The Bank Deposit amounts represent an annual average balance on deposit as of the last day of each quarter. 51 r l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANOB COUNTY V Estimated Populations of Cities and Unincorporated Areas Served by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County June 30, 1994 }y LI Ci41C PLDIIlACiSD city Eamu"Cim Anaheim 290,700 Los Alamitos 12,150 r Brea 34,600 Newport Beach 69,300 Buena Park 72,900 Orange 118,000 , Costa Mesa 102,400 Placentia 44,100 N Cypress 46,000 Santa Ana 310,400 Fountain Valley 55,000 Seal Beach 26,050 Fullerton 12lo SOO Stanton 32,250 Garden Grove 152,800 Tustin 59,800 1 Huntington Beach 189,200 Villa Park 6,425 I . Irvine 121,200 westminister 81,600 LI La Habra 54,100 Yorba Linda 57,400 La Palma 15,700 L 23 Cities Subtotal 2,072,575 Unincorporated 168,100 Total 2,240,675 40 L 1� y L L Source: Demographic Research Unit, California Department of Finance. y 52 u 'd CODNSY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CODNTY Insurance in Force As of June 30, 1994 XYRa y Dadneiibla yyndp W All-Rink Prom z v Nine Carriers 5$ Total $200 Million - Includes: Fire, value per per Occur. Flood, and Unit of ($35 Million Earthquake Insurance Earthquake) r Boiler a Machinery Kemper/Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. $25,000 to $100 Million $100,000 r Employee Dishonesty/ Faithful Performance Hartford Insurance Group $5,000 $2 Million Error. s 0mi..ion. See Employee Dishonesty/ ry Faithful Performance General Liability Self Insured r ($3.5 Million Reserve) Master Course of Construction Encon/Zurich 51, Values $45 Million at Risk per Occur./ Location Travel & Accident Heritage Life -0- $400,000 r Insurance Co. Each Accident Workers' Self Insured m CGmnen.ation ($9.2 Million Reserve) r Excess Workers' Crmnen.ation National Union Fire $250,000 $1 Million Insurance Co. Each Accident Employers Liability Source: County Sanitation Districts' Accounting Division r 53 L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY N Volume of Wag teWater Treated Last Ten Fiscal Years L Fiscal Millions of Year Gallons Per Dav L 1984-85 233 L 1905-86 241 1986-87 249 1987-86 258 1988-89 264 1989-90 268 Irk 1990-91 269 1991-92 227 1992-93 232 L 1993-94 228 (1) V L YL ( . FBII Yi L (1) - Estimated. L L Source: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. , LO 54 J COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORMM COUNTY eiosolids Produced Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal -- Year TRRRNSR r 1984-85 - (1) 1985-86 24,623 1986-87 29,519 1987-88 32,939 1988-89 45,164 1989-90 48,439 1990-91 44,968 1991-92 43,464 ' 1992-93 42,964 1993-94 37,384 N r (1)- Data unavailable prior to 1985-86. Source: County Sanitation District$ of Orange County. -- 55 V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OAANS COUNTY V Miscellaneous Statistics June 30, 1994 District Organivtina, 9 Districts setviting 11 cities, unincorporated areas Ir and four Special districts ae follows: 1 : D:a 2f� iat Ne l ➢Se of ian Din[riet No. ] r Cities: Cities: Cities: Orange Anaheim Irvine Santa Ana Brea 0.90 Tustin Buena Park Sant. Me special Districts: Cypress Tustin Costa Mesa Sanitary Fountain Valley special Districts: District Fullerton Coats Mesa Sanitary Huntington Beach District hd la Nabs La Palma Los Al.mita. Diatriet w0. u Santa Ana City of Huntington Beach Seal Beach Stanton ➢iatrirt Bm_ 1 Special Districts: Diatriet Ne. 1+ Cities: Garden Grove Sanitary Cities: V Anaheim District Brea Brea Midway City Sanitary orange i Fountain Valley District Yorba Linda V✓ Fullerton La Habra Diatriet Nm. 5 Orange City of Newport Beach Diatriet No_ l4 Placentia Cities: Santa Ana Dletriet Nm. 6 Irvine Villa Park Cities: Orange Yorba Linda Newport Beach Tustin Special Dietricte: Special Districts: Spacial District.: Garden Grove Coate Naga Sanitary Irvine Hanch water Sanitary District District District Governing Body, 42 member Board of Director. .� Staff: 604 full-time and 17 part-time employees Operational Date: July 1. 1954 Authority: California Health 6 safety Code Section 4700 at. seq. easviosn Wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal. V service Area: 470 square miles Population Served, 2,240,673 I I Operations, Total miles of trunk and subtruak severe- 915 miles �I Number of pumping Stations- 16 Average Daily Flow- Plant No. 1 74 NOD (1) Average Deily Flow- Plant Mo. 1 154 NOD (1) Total --77FIW(1) (1)- in millions of gallons per day. Source: County Sanitation Districts- Accounting Division- L 56 it a C� p b COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California Finance Department Accounting Division (714) 962-2411 marling eddmss: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 s[ et addmss: 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 9270E-7018 CSOOC 9194 P r.�We JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 9, 1994 Agenda Item 13: Consideration of actions re CEOA requirements relative to Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, re Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1 Summary For background information on the said project, see the attached Staff Report dated October 13, 1994 and Draft Supplement No. 3 to said Program Environmental Impact Report. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends motions to receive and file comments received on the Notice of Preparation; receive and file Staff Report dated October 13, 1994: authorize the General Manager to file a Notice of Completion of Draft Supplement No. 3; and fixing December 14, 1994 at 7:30 p.m. at the Districts' administrative office, as the date, time and place for public hearing on Draft Supplement No. 3 to said Program Environmental Impact Report. wpdmWc95\1&1109.94 -1- e v 1 y COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA EULISAVENUE October 13, 1994 +o AID 80.0127 Po.BOx212J FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 82728-9127 P141982-2411 STAFF REPORT SUPPLEMENT NO. 3 TO 1989 PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RE RECONSTRUCTION OF SURGE TOWER NO. 1, PART OF OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES, JOB NO. J-34-1 BACKGROUND In 1989, the Districts adopted a comprehensive plan entitled, "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan", which identified facility needs for a 30-year planning period. From time-to-time, as projects are identified which were not included in, or differ from, the 1989 Master Plan and its Program Environmental Impact Report, supplements to the Program EIR are prepared. Because a Program EIR was certified in 1989, a supplement to the program EIR can concentrate on the project and does not have to revisit the wastewater treatment program. Draft Supplement No. 3 to the 1989 Program EIR has been prepared to deal with a change in a project. This report reviews the need for Supplement No. 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION For the past several years, the Districts have taken several steps to improve effluent disposal reliability, including the replacement of portions of the Districts' 1954 78-inch standby ouffall with 120-inch outfall pipe, concurrent with the rebuilding of Pacific Coast Highway over the Santa Ana River and construction of the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy Marsh, south of Treatment Plant No. 2. The subject of this staff report is the relocation and heightening of Surge Tower No. 1 within Treatment Plant No. 2. This project includes the reconstruction of Surge Tower No. 1, the shorter of the two surge towers on the outfall disposal system. The planned work is in keeping with 1989 Master Plan of Collection, Disposal and Treatment Facilities and with two subsequent reliability studies performed to improve disposal reliability and provide seismic upgrades. The latter two separate studies have resulted in a recommendation to reconstruct Surge Tower No. 1 at a location 400 feet closer to Pacific Coast Highway and 10 feet taller than existing Surge Towers Nos. 1 and 2. Because of this change, staff believes that Supplement No. 3 to our 1989 Program Environmental Impact Report ./ should be completed. 1 6 In 1993, the Districts completed a seismic analysis of the Huntington Beach Treatment Plant site. As the Directors are well aware, the Treatment Plant is within the Newport- Inglewood fault zone. Sonic seismic studies were undertaken to determine the location of the fault fractures and a significant fracture was found to underlie the location of the existing surge towers. For this reason, we believe the surge tower should be reconstructed at a site approximately 400 feet south of the existing lower. This year, a reliability study was completed which recommended that the standby outfall be extended to deep water at an earlier date than year 2005 (the year shown in our 1989 Master Plan) based on higher observed wet weather peak flows than previously estimated. The design of the surge tower replacement, now in progress, indicates that the surge tower should be 10 feet higher than shown in the 1989 Master Plan. Surge Tower No. 1 was constructed in 1959 and extended in 1976 to an elevation 69 feet above sea level. For reference, the ground elevation is approximately elevation 12 in the Treatment Plant. Existing Surge Tower No 2, which serves our on-line 120-inch ouffall, was raised to elevation 88 feel six years ago. The 1989 Master Plan assumed that Surge Tower No. 1 would be reconstructed to the same elevation, 88 feet above sea level. However, the design calculations now being performed show that Surge Tower No. 1 should be constructed to elevation 98 feet to provide hydraulic capacity to switch flows to either the existing 120-inch, 5 mile outfall, or the planned 120-inch reconstruction of the existing 78-inch outfall which is planned to be longer and thereby requiring more hydraulic head (a taller surge tower). The reliability option of directing 100% of the flow to either outfall is the main reason that Surge Tower No. 1 is recommended to be reconstructed 10 feet higher than originally planned. CEQA ACTIONS In August, the Directors found that this project could have a significant affect on the environment, and authorized that circulation of an Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment, and preparation and circulation of Draft Supplement No. 3. The initial study and Environmental Impact Assessment was circulated to local, regional and state agencies in accordance with CEQA, and the following responses were received: Agency Response • County of Orange, Environmental No Comment Management Agency • California Coastal Commission Analyze impacts on Santa Ana River mouth estuary, visual impacts • State of California, Water Information regarding State loans, Resources Control Board dewatering impacts • City of Newport Beach None • City of Costa Mesa None 2 u • Costa Mesa Sanitary District None • SCAG None • Orange County Water District None • CALTRANS None Draft Supplement No. 3 has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000, at seq., and Administrative Code Section 15000 , at seq., as amended. The Districts are the lead agency for this draft supplement with principal responsibility for approving the required entitlements of the proposed project and implementing construction and environmental impact mitigation. Appropriate mitigation measures will be incorporated into the Findings and Mitigation Monitoring Plan adopted by the Districts' Boards of Directors. Subsequently, they will be incorporated into any design specifications for the approved project. SUMMARY Draft Supplement No. 3 has addressed all responses received as a result of the circulation of the Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment (Notice of Preparation). Staff is, therefore, recommending the following actions: 1. Receive and file comments received on the Notice of Preparation of Supplement No. 3 to the 1989 Program Environmental Impact Report. 2. Receive and file this Staff Report and Draft Supplement No. 3. 3. Authorize the General Manager to file a Notice of Completion of Draft Supplement No. 3. 4. Set December 14, 1994 at 7:30 p.m. at the Districts' Administrative office as the date, time and place for a public hearing on Draft Supplement No. 3 to the 1989 Program Environmental Impact Report. 5. Establish December 31, 1994 as the final date for which all comments must be received on Draft Supplement No. 3 to the 1989 Program Environmental Impact Report. wTJ-W%tfrptl.m 3 r f DRAFT SUPPLEMENT NO. 3 (SCH # 94071060) OCEAN OUTFACE RELIABILITY UPGRADES PROJECT J-34-1 PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH # 88012008) FOR COLLECTION, TREATMENT, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES MASTER PLAN FOR THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Originally Certified by the Boards of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY July 1989 Lead Agency: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Contact Person: Mr. Thomas Dawes (714) 962-2411 Mailing Address: P.O. Boa 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Prepared by: K P. Lindstrom, Inc. P.O. Box 51008 Pacific Grove, CA 93950 Contact Person: Mr. Kris Lindstrom (408) 372-5989 OCTOBER 1994 V DRAFT SUPPLEMENT NO. 3 (SCH # 94071060) OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES PROJECT J-34-1 PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT(SCH # 98012008) FOR COLLECITON, TREATMENT, AND DISPOSAL FA['[1.rr[Fc MASTER PLAN FOR THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA Originally Certified by the Boards of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY July 1999 Lead Agency: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 �i Contact Person: Mr. Thomas Dawes (714) 962-2411 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Prepared by: K P. Lindstrom, Inc. P.O. Box 51008 Pacific Grove, CA 93950 Contact Person: Mr. Kris Lindstrom (408) 372-5989 OCTOBER 1994 r . TABLE OF CONTENTS �..� EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................ Pages 1-III Section Paae 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose.......................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of this Supplement to the FOR........................... 1 1.3 Incorporation by Reference............................................ 3 1.4 Responsible Agencies.................................................... 3 1.5 Intended Use of the Supplement.................................... 3 1.6 Agencies and Organizations........................................... 4 1.7 Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program................ 4 1.8 Required Easements and Permits.................................. 5 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................... 5 2.1 Location and Boundaries.............................................. 5 2.2 Description..................................................................... 5 2.3 Project Charecteristios................................................... 7 3.0 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES............. 7 3.1 Summary........................................................................ 7 3.2 Areas of Controversy...................................................... 8 4.0 RELATED PROJECTS..................................................................... 8 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES OF POTENTIALLY 8 `..� SIGNIFICANT ISSUES........................................................................ 8 5.1 Earth................................................................................ 8 5.1.1 Environmental Selling.......................................... 8 5.1.2 Project Impacts.................................................... 9 5.1.3 Mitigation Measures............................................. 10 5.1.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts............................. 11 5.2 Air Quality......................................................................... 11 5.2.1 Environmental Setting.......................................... 11 5.2.2 Project Impacts..................................................... 11 5.2.3 Mitigation Measures.............................................. 13 5.2.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts.............................. 13 5.3 Hydrology and Water Quality........................................... 13 5.3.1 Environmental Setting.......................................... 13 5.3.2 Project Impacts..................................................... 14 5.3.3 Mitigation Measures.............................................. 14 5.3.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts............................. 14 5.4 Noise................................................................................. 14 5.4.1 Environmental Setting.......................................... 14 5.4.2 Project Impacts..................................................... 14 5.4.3 Mitigation Measures.............................................. 14 5.4.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts.............................. 14 5.5 Aesthetics.......................................................................... 14 5.5.1 Environmental Setting........................................... 14 5.5.2 Project Impacts..................................................... 16 5.5.3 Mitigation Measures.............................................. 16 5.5A Unavoidable Adverse ImpsctL............................. 16 �7 i 6.0 GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION................................................................................................. 18 �a✓ 7.0 ALTERNATIVES................................................................................... 17 7.1 No Project Alternative..................................................... 17 7.2 Alternative Configura8ons for Surge Towers.................. 17 8.0 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USES OF MAN'S ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY.................................................................... 18 9.0 ANY SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES WHICH WOULD BE INVOLVED IN THE PROPOSED ACTION SHOULD IT BE IMPLEMENTED....... 18 10.0 ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED............... 19 11.0 REFERENCES....................................................................... 20 �../ LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 REGIONAL LOCATION MAP ............................ After page 5 2 PROJECT LOCATION MAP..................._.......... After Figure 1 3 ALTERNATE LOCATION MAP........................... After Figure 2 4 SURGE TOWER CONFIGURATION.................. After Figure 3 5 SURGE TOWER VISUAL IMPACT..................... After Page 9 6 SURGE TOWER AERIAL PERSPECTIVE.......... After Figure 5 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1 Estimated Cost of Various Project Elements............... 6 2 Estimated Project Construction Costs......................... 7 3 Construction Impacts Indicator Summary.................... 8 4 Average Emission Factors for Heavy Construction Equipment............................................... 12 5 Emissions Associated with Demolition,Excavation and Hauling of Materials....................................................... 12 6 Alternatives for Placement of Surge Tower......_........... 18 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..s Introduction This supplement has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), as a supplement to a previously certified Final Program EIR(SCH Nos.8801008 and 88020306)on a thirty- year Master Plan for Collection,Treatment and Disposal Facilities(Master Plan)to serve the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(Districts). The Master Plan and Final EIR which was certified in July 1989, contained a general description of the proposed project as part of a major long-term upgrading and expansion of the Districts regional wastewater treatment and disposal facilities(Jones and Stokes, Inc., 1989). This EIR Supplement(Supplement No. 3) reflects the specific changes to a single project referred to by the Districts as Job No. J-34-1,the outfall reliability project,and the site-specific impacts associated with its construction. The project has been modified mainly to reflect the presence of an earthquake fault beneath an old surge tower that was to have been replaced. There are at present two surge towers,one of which needs to be replaced to insure it can accommodate peak flours. Physically separating the two surge towers by an even greater distance is being done to Increase reliability and reduce the risk of both structures being damaged in a major earthquake. An Initial Study and Notice of Preparation (NOP)for the proposed project sent out in July 1994 Indicated that there is a potential for significant environmental Impacts related to soils and earth movement,air and water quality, noise, use of natural resources and visual impact. Only a handful of agencies responded and none indicated a significant Interest in the project. The only agency with some discretionary approval over the project is the California Coastal Commission which must issue a permit for the project. The State Clearinghouse, located within the Office of Planning and Research(OPR)a branch of the Governors Office,received a copy of the NOP from the Lead Agency and transmitted copies of that NOP to those state agencies which OPR Identified as potentially responsible. The project has been assigned State Clearinghouse Number 94071060. The proposed alignment will not require procurement of easements. Permits will be required from the Division of Industrial Safety(DIS)for shoring,and California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB, Region 9)for dewatering. Proiecl Description The oulfall reliability projects are to be constructed at County Sanitation District Treatment Plant No.2 located in Huntington Beach, California adjacent to the Santa Ana River mouth just north of the Santa Ana River,east of Pacific Coast Highway and south of Brookhurst Avenue. The project is modifications to the ocean outfall system to provide new on-shore piping,valving,and construction of a new surge tower and modification to an existing surge tower. The major project element for which the environmental impacts are most significant(particularly the visual impact)is the new surge tower which will be in a new location (400 feet to the south) and rise to an elevation of 98 feet,some 10 feet higher than planned in the 1989 Program EIR. The Districts ocean outfall facilities consist of three booster pump stations,two surge towers and three discharges(two to the ocean via oudails and an emergency overflow to the Santa Ana River designated Discharge 003). Primary and secondary treated wastewater from both plants is transferred to the ocean outfall facilities via the Interplant pipelines. Under normal operation conditions,the co-mingled effluents are pumped through the 120-inch diameter ocean outfall (Discharge 001) placed into service in 1971. This outlall replaced an older 78-inch-diameter outtall which is still available for standby service. Outfall �a✓ Booster Station C,placed into service in 1989,has a total hydraulic capacity of 600 mgd and serves as the lead pump station. Older pump stations are the Rothrock Booster Station (160 mgd capacity which will �../ soon be demolished)and the Foster Booster Station (320 mgd capacity)which serves as a standby station. Surge Towers No. 1 and No.2 reduce surges in wastewater flow that could otherwise damage the outfall pipes. Tower No. 1 serves the standby emergency 784nch outfall (Discharge No. 002)and Surge Tower No.2 serves the active 120-inchdiameter outlet (Discharge 001). The new proposed surge tower will be a 98-foot tall round concrete structure some 26 feet(inside)in diameter which will have a spiral staircase wrapped around the outside to provide access to the open top for inspections and observations. This new structure will be designated Surge Tower No. 1 and replace an existing structure located 400 feet to the north which will eventually be demolished once the replacement tower is operational. The other existing surge tower(No.002)will also be raised 10 feet to match the new surge tower. There will be new piping and valving which will connect the two surge towers with both ocean outfalls. The plan also includes the addition of a valve station connecting Outfalls 001 and 002 downstream of the surge towers. The project will also involve demolition,piping,valving, control equipment installation and instrumentation. Overall the project costs are estimated to be in the range of $5.5$6 million. Environmental Impacts Summary and Identification of Proposed Mitigation Measures A summary of the potentially significant environmental impacts identified and their magnitude are summarized in Table A along with a listing of the proposed mitigation measures and the level to which these will reduce the potential Impacts. General construction impacts associated with building the new facilities is not expected to create any signifi- cant adverse impacts to adjoining residential areas. Measures will be taken to mitigate dust generation, noise, air pollutant emissions, and other potential impacts normally associated with excavation and construction activities.Construction of the proposed facilities will represent a small part of a much larger, relatively continuous process that has been underway for years and will continue into the future at Treatment Plant No.2. What may be of greatest interest to local residents and those who reside near the construction sites is the schedule for construction due to the fact that the most potentially adverse impacts are of relative short duration. The construction will occur over about a one-year time-frame with the key projects being constructed between May and November of 1995 if all goes according to the proposed schedule. The actual excavation and pile driving are relatively short-time-frame events on the order of a week or two. Perhaps the most significant construction impact will be the pile driving. Given recent experience at Reclamation Plant No.1 where projects involve the placing of thousands of piles,the eighty or so piles required for this project will be relatively routine and given the soil conditions,they can be easily placed within a one month period. The Districts have developed some rather specific contract specifications for pile driving to control noise which will be made a part of the project bid package. These specifications, control the hours of operation and control the maximum noise levels so as to comply with applicable local ordinances for noise. There will be no significant operational impacts associated with the project. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The most significant unavoidable adverse impact will be noise generation of a short-term nature. Some noise may be anticipated even after the implementation of mitigation measures due to the nature of pile- driving. The impact should be minor since only 80 piles must be driven. In the past several thousand piles have had to be driving for major projects much closer to residential areas at Reclamation Plant No.1. The will also be an unavoidable visual impact resulting from the relocation of the surge tower and an increase in height of the new and remaining older surge tower. This is not expected to be significant in the long term,after those familiar with the views of the treatment plant become accustomed to the change. There will be no significant irreversible environmental changes which would be involved in the proposed action should it be implemented. The proposed project will involve the use of fossil fuel,steel,concrete, and other natural resources which when once utilized represent either an irretrievable loss or depletion of those resources and materials. No significant impacts on the natural environment will occur. Altematives to the Proposed Acton The alternatives to the proposed project are rather limited from an engineering and environmental perspective and the specific project that has been selected on the basis of eliminating any significant adverse environmental effects and the extent practical, reducing them to a level of insignificance. The alternatives evaluated include the "no project"alternative,aftemative configurations for surge towers, alternative locations for pipes and alternatives for access to the surge towers(which are not discussed in detail,but are in the engineering studies completed as part of design). The"no project"alternative would result in significant adverse impacts to water quality since peak effluent flows could exceed the existing surge tower capacity resulting in an overflow event necessitating bypassing of effluent into the Santa Ana River via discharge point No.003. Therefore,the no project aftemative is deemed environmentally unacceptable and would result in violation of the D'isbiaW NPDES permit and possible fines of up to $25,000 a day for each incident. There were a limited number of alternatives available for consideration for the surge tower replacement portion which are dictated by the hydraulic requirements for pumping and the seismic safety considerations. The two alternative locations were considered and the site of the existing surge tower or close proximity were rejected in favor of a location some 400 feet southerly towards the Pacific Ocean due to seismic safety considerations. Table A Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impact Impact Impact Category Environmental Impacts Significanc Mitigation Measures Significance a After Geology, Soils, Project area is seismically sensitive. Severe ground PS Adherence to recommendations of geotechnical INS and Seismicity shaking and unstable soil conditions could result in pipeline engineering consultants will minimize potential rupture or surge lower uplifting or liquifaction with resulting damage to sewer facilities during a seismic event. discharge of treated effluent underground or along ground (See Section 5.1.3.) surface and possibly into the Santa Ana River(See Section 5.1.2.) A geotechnical study completed by Converse Consultants Orange County for the Districts Construction would involve the excavation of some 5900 contained recommendations which were used by the cubic yard soil to allow the installation of pipelines and project design engineers in the design of the valves and the foundation for the new surge tower and proposed facilities. These recommendations demolition of the old facilities being replaced. addressed a number of potential Impacts including seismic safety, liquefaction, settling,groundwater Some 471 cubic yards of concrete rubble will be generated uplifting that could float structures and the need for by demolition of old pipes and the existing surge tower supporting piles for the surge tower. being replaced. Some 2268 cubic yards of new concrete will be required for construction. Excavation work will be done to assure safety and performed In the manner set forth in the operation Local topography would be temporarily altered due to rules, orders, and regulations prescribed by the stockpiling of soils. Disturbed areas would be subject to CAUOSHA Construction Safety Orders through the wind erosion and potential water erosion during the specifications that must be followed by the construction period expected to last about 45 months. contractor. Contractor will be required to obtain needed permits. Hydrology/ During the construction period, there are no anticipated PS Scheduling sewer construction during dry months. NS Water Quality times that effluent disposal operations will be impaired. This is critical since the District's NPDES permit prohibits Groundwater will be pumped and discharged bypassing of the ocean outrall or allowing wastewater to pursuant to the Districts'NPDES permit. (See overflow into the Santa Ana River. Section 5.3.2.) Open trenches may be subject to groundwater infiltration, which will need to be discharged properly. NS= No Significant Impact PS n Potentially Significant Adverse Impact(Temporary) s = significant Adverse Impact Table A(confinued) Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures Impact Impact Impact Category Environmental Impacts Significance Mitigation Measures Significance After Mitigation Air Quality Dust and gaseous and particulate emissions from PS Dus suppression by watering. (See Section 5.7.3.) NS construction equipment and work force vehicles. It is estimated that as many as 250-860 truck trips may Gaseous pollutant emissions from vehicles can be be required to complete the job requireemins. The reduced by the use of well-tuned and properly calculated emissions will be minor on a regional scale maintained equipment and not cause any significant local air pollution but will contribute to the sevre regional air pollution problems. In this particular case,the emissions from construction Stockpiles of soil on site should be wetted as workers will be relatively minor since it is estimated that needed to control dust. An alternative for the full-time workforce will only average about 25 semipermanent storage is the use of dust workers for the year. This project would represent about suppressant materials sprayed on the piles. 1/13th of the impacts previously reported for the average on-going emissions associated with construction workers in the 1989 Master Plan. Aesthetics Loss of vegetation in a few areas along with exposed soil PS Landscaping will be done after construction is NS from excavation. Visual impacts from amchinery, completed to re-establish landscaped areas trenching,and dirt piles during construction as seen from impacted by construction. The work will be done Santa Ana River Recreation Trail, as part of the Districts'long-term Landscaping and Security Master Plan. The only long-term visual impact will be associated with the relocation of one surge tower and height increase of Excess earth will be removed from acreas of the existing Surge Tower No.2. These height increases construction. are not expected to create any significant adverse impacts that are significantly different than the visual environment which presently exists. NS = No significant Impact PS = Potentially Significant Adverse Impact(Temporary) S = Significant Adverse Impact 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose This document is a supplement to a previously certified Final Program EIR(SCH Nos.8801008 and 88020306)on a thirty-year Master Plan for Collection,Treatment and Disposal Facilities(Master Plan)to serve the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(Districts). The Master Plan and Final EIR which was certified in July 1989, contained a general description of the proposed project(Jones and Stokes,Inc., 1989). This supplement has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 at seq.,and Administrative Code Section 15000 at seq.,as amended. The Districts are the Lead Agency for this supplement,and the public agency with principal responsibility for approving the required entitlements of the proposed project. Pursuant to Section 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines,the Districts have chosen to prepare a supplement(this is Supplement No.3)to the previously certified EIR. A supplement is the appropriate format because no major conceptual changes in the project have been proposed by the District and the focus is the site-specific impacts which have resulted in a change in location and the proposed height of the structure which has been recommended as a result of more detailed design studies completed since 1989. These proposed changes were anticipated as part of the on-going planning and preliminary and final design of the project which is a small element of numerous on-going construction projects to upgrade and expand the Districts'regional facilities. The specific recommended project locations is driven largely by the results of the geotechnical evaluation completed by Converse Consultants Orange County(CCOC)in May 1994. This EIR Supplement(Supplement No. 3) reflects the specific changes to a single project referred to by the Districts as Job No.J-34-1,the outfall reliability project. The project has been modified mainly to reflect the presence of an earthquake fault beneath an old surge tower that was to have been replaced. There are at present two surge towers, one of which needs to be replaced to insure it can accommodate peak flows. Physically separating the two surge towers by an even greater distance is being done to increase reliability and reduce the risk of both structures being damaged in a major earthquake. 1.2 Scope of this Supplement to the FEIR An Initial Study and Notice of Preparation (NOP)for the proposed project sent out in July 1994 indicated that there is a potential for significant environmental impacts,thus it is proposed to prepare Supplement No. 3 to the 1989 Program EIR. Pursuant to Section 15163(b)of the State CEQA Guidelines,"The supplement to the EIR need contain only the information necessary to make the previous EIR adequate for the project as revised". The Initial Study contained a she-specific description of the project site and a completed environmental checklist and narrative description of environmental impacts. The following areas in which"yes"or"maybe"had been indicated are the focus of this supplement: ±�• � '�`v� ""E IhetJatdrao'�1he '"` �'>>.: ;�``f�}� 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geo- logical substructures? b. Disruptions,displacements, compaction or un- covering of the soil? _1_ C. Change in topography or ground surface relief J features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, ✓ either on or off the site? 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of am- ✓ bient air ual 7 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents,or the course of direction J of water movements,in either marine or fresh waters? e. Discharge into surface waters,or in any alter- ation of surface water quality,including but not ✓ limited to temperature,dissolved oxygen,or turbidity?. 6 Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? J 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate or use of any natural re- J sources? 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public,or will the J proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive she open to public view? In response to the July 1994 NOP for this supplement(designated SCHA94071060), only a few responses were received. These responses indicated there was no major interest in the project(a is a relatively routine project for the Districts)and those agencies which responded did not identity any significant issues that need to be addressed. The responses received included the following: State of California California Coastal Commission- should address any potential visual impacts and how those impacts would be mitigated and water quality in the mouth of the Santa Ana River if the project will have any impacts Department of Transportation-No comments State Water Resources Control Board-Must comply with requirements IF a State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan is applied for the project. Need to discuss dewatering impacts,growth inducement If capacity is being Increased,cultural resources assessment and air quality Conformity Determination 1 (d applying for an SRF loan). .may -2- Regional Agencies Southern California Association of Governments-has published project description in the Intergovernmental Review Report for public comment and review. Local Agencies Orange County Water District-No Interest City of Newport Beach-Minor Interest indicated,no comments City of Costa Mesa-Planning Division-No Interest Costa Mesa Sanitary District-Minor Interest,no comments County of Orange-No comment 1.3 Incorporated by Reference The State CEQA Guidelines allow environmental impact reports and negative declarations to incorporate by reference all or portions of other documents that are a matter of public record. Where all or a portion of another document is incorporated by reference, the Incorporated language shall be considered to be set forth in full as part of the text of the environmental impact report or negative declaration. The Information contained in this EIR is based, in part, upon prior environmental documentation and focused environmental inquiry which includes the project. These documents,incorporated by reference, Include the following: Draft Environmental Impact Report on Collection,Treatment,and Disposal Facilities Master Plan (State Clearinghouse#88012008 and 88010306),March, 1989. Final Environmental Impact Report on Collection,Treatment,and Disposal Facilities Master Plan (State Clearinghouse#88012008 and 88010306),July 1989. Final Supplement No. 1 to Final EIR on Collection,Treatment,and Disposal Facilities Master Plan , July 1989. Interplant Pipeline,Job No. 1-9,(State Clearinghouse#90010580),August 1990. Final Supplement No.2 to Final EIR on Collection,Treatment,and Disposal Facilities Master Plan , July 1989. Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No.2-30, (State Clearinghouse#91071084). February, 1992. Copies of these documents are available for review at the office of the County Sandation Districts of Orange County(10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,CA) during regular business hours. 1.4 Responsible Agencies The State Clearinghouse, located within the Office of Planning and Research (OPR)a branch of the Governor's Office, received a copy of the NOP from the Lead Agency and transmitted copies of that NOP to those state agencies which OPR identified as potentially responsible. The project has been assigned State Clearinghouse Number 94071060. Other responsible agencies who have received a copy of the NOP from the Districts include the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,California Department of Transportation(Caltrans),South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD),County of Orange, City of Costa Mesa,City of Huntington Beach,and City of Fountain Valley,City of Newport Beach,California Department of Fish and Game and U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service. 1.5 Intended Use of the Supplement The intent of this document is two-fold. First,it is to provide an environmental basis for the decision-making process through the identification of those direct and indirect environmental effects which may result from -3- the proposed construction of the project. And a second purpose Is to develop appropriate mitigation measures which can be Incorporated into any subsequent discretionary actions on the project to minimize potential environmental Impacts associated therewith.Appropriate mitigation measures will be incorporated into the Findings and Mitigation Monitoring Plan(See section 1.8 below) adopted by the District's Board of Directors. Subsequently,they will be Incorporated Into any design specifications for the approved project. 1.6 Agencies and Organization The following agencies and organizations are associated with this project: Lead Agency and Applicant County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue (Post Office Box 8127) Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 (714) 962-2411 Environmental Consultant K.P.Lindstrom, Inc. 729 Bayview Avenue (P.O.Box 51008) Pacific Grove,CA 93950 (408) 372-5989 Engineering Consultant John Carollo Engineers(JCE) 4300 Harbor Boulevard Santa Ana,CA 92704 (714)540-4300 1.7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting �as� State legislation(Assembly Bill 3180),codified as Section 21081.6 of the Public Resource Code, requires public agencies to set up monitoring and reporting programs for the purpose of ensuring compliance with those mitigation measures adopted as conditions of Project approval. This is designed to avoid significant environmental effects identified in environmental impact reports and negative declarations,and require that they be adopted as conditions of Project approval. The statutes states: When making the findings required by subdivision(a)of Sedion 21081 or when adopting a negative declaration pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision(c)of Section 21080, the public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of an agency havingjurisoiction by law over natural resources affected by this project, that agency shall, if so requested by the lead or responsible agency,prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. Pursuant to this requirement,the Lead Agency and/or applicable Responsible Agencies are obligated by statute to establish and monitor project compliance with those mitigation measures adopted as conditions of approval for the purpose of mitigating significant environmental effects. The manner in which compliance with this requirement is normally established by the Districts is to contract with the Distdcts' environmental consultant,to review all Plans and Specifications prior to approval by the Board of Directors to assure that adapted mitigation measures have been incorporated into project design and construction specifications, -4- 1.8 Required Easements and Permits The proposed alignment will not require procurement of easements. Additional permits for construction of the sewage conveyance facilities(willAvill not) also be required from Division of Industrial Safety(DIS), California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCBB)and California Department of Fish and Game. The RWQCB requires a permit for the discharge of dewatering effluent from any of the construction activities. The Districts'blanket NPDES dewatering permit covering the requirements for such construction activities will be included in the contract specifications and the Districts will supervise and oversee these operations to assure compliance and assist as necessary to fulfill compliance. This can include accepting dewatering waters into local sewer lines. 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Location and Boundaries The outfall reliability projects are to be constructed at County Sanitation Districts'Treatment Plant No.2 located in Huntington Beach, California adjacent to the Santa Ana River mouth just north of the Santa Ana River,east of Pacific Coast Highway and south of Brookhurst Street(Figure 1). The property on which the project is located consists of an ebsting wastewater treatment facility located on 105 acres of land owned by the Districts as shown in Figure 2. 2.2 Description The project is the modification of the ocean outfall system to provide new on-shore piping,valving,and construction of a new surge tower and modificafion to an ebsting surge tower(See Figure 3). The major J project element for which the environmental impacts are most significant(particularly the visual Impact)is the new surge tower which will be in a new location (400 feet to the south)and rise to a height of 98 feet, some 10 feet higher than planned in the 1989 Program EIR(See Figure 4). The specific recommended project components are the result of a predesign study that was part of a long term planning project to evaluate reliability and pumping capacity to handle peak wet weather(storm)flows at the Districts'two wastewater treatment plants. This study,completed by John Carollo Engineers in February 1994,recommended a number of specific projects to improve reliability and provide sufficient hydraulic capacity to prevent bypassing and overflowing treated effluent to the Santa Ana River at Treatment Plant No.2 in Huntington Beach,California. The Districts'ocean outfall facilities consist of three booster pump stations,two surge towers and three discharges(two to the ocean via outfalls and an emergency overflow to the Santa Ana River designated Discharge 003). Primary and secondary treated wastewater from both plants is transferred to the ocean outfall facilities via the interplant pipelines. Under normal operation conditions,the co-mingled effluents are pumped through the 120-inch diameter ocean outfall (Discharge 001)placed into service in 1971. This outfall replaced an older 784nch-diameter outfall which is still available for standby service. Outfali Booster Station C, placed into service in 1989,has a total hydraulic capacity of 600 mgd and serves as the lead pump station. Older pump stations are the Rothrock Booster Station (160 mgd capacity which will soon be demolished)and the Foster Booster Station (320 mgd capacity)which serves as a standby station. Surge Towers No. 1 and No.2 reduce surges in wastewater flow that could otherwise damage the outfall pipes. Tower No. 1 serves the standby emergency 784nch outfall (Discharge No.002)and Surge Tower No.2 serves the active 1204nch-diameter outfall(Discharge 001). A surge tower is designed to serve as an in-line tank on the ocean outfalls that can accommodate peak flows and provide hydraulic relief to overcome pumping surges and tidal pressure. They some to handle `J transient water levels during pump start-up or peak flow periods. -5- REGIONAL LOCATION MAP LOS ANGELES CO = aLvo, LA HA A Iw � NOFggFq e� RE w. Op q�gOq oADA LwOA © Op FU N p p xAWEn APUA ELACAVE LWRD rwr ONA OE Ox Fq E w PNE.EWE pF P LA A K k', i 9ily i LNCGL Wt ��jy y JF ALL YP E S y AW i AVE PAF7 00 ORA GE 13 Cxnv x AVE • F`anav 'w FWv. cRDE o OV E o 3 1 3 OV DISTRICT 14 B R , -SPHERE OF TUS INFLUENCE u rA t, ANT ,p P , AY Cp PA • E LL1 AVE P P P P ON A P 5^N JIfOp r wr PACIFIC o' ME$ pW ' IRVWE OCEANd � DISTRICT 14 .r� NE OR BEACH TREATMENT PLANT 80.2 HUNTINGTON BEACH RECLAMATION PLANT NO.1 FOUNTAIN VALLEY e VI[IMIT, Y.F FIGURE 1 !�1!!!•fr'Ji� DISTRICT COU.N � SANITAT(ON CALIFORNIA ..00EAN 'bUTFALL RELIA81LITY UPGRADES . . ON -MAP tA P — ioA FIGURE 2 ALTERNATE LOCATION MAP NIGN AGIMIY FAULT SEGUE nUSnNG / NOGERATE ACTMIY SURGE TG FAULT SECY No. 2 / 85 To "+...::::- ti '1 EXISfINC 120' OUIFAIL 001 IXISTIN suRCE Towns . ..'�.� � Ewsnnc IZG�' oulretL ao2 uEIER 4 ° ......:4.:..::.�... - ULTRASGNIc NEIER 3 o co .'�SY O = 0 2> Ao o� 09 neR )t" � o� BST 0 NEW SURGE TOWER No.1 ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS FIGURE 3 SURGE TOWER CONFIGURATION MEW 77 M]t T rn F C� fatLltaip . old Surge Tower 001 will be Ddsting Surge Tower 002 A new Surge Tbwer 001 will be demolished. will be raised ten feet. be constricted to a height A new spiral staircase will of 98 feet. A spiral staircase be added. will provide access. This new structure will be 400 feet south of the eidsting surge Tower 001. FIGURE 4 This new proposed surge tower that is part of this project will consist of a 98-foot tall round concrete - structure some 26 feet(inside)in diameter which will have a spiral staircase wrapped around the outside to provide access to the open top for inspections and observations. This new structure will be designated Surge Tower No. 1 and replace an existing structure located 400 feet to the north which presently has this same designation (Surge Tower No. 1). The old surge tower will eventually be demolished once the replacement is constructed and in operation. There will be new piping and valving which will connect the two surge towers with both ocean ouffalls. it is anticipated that a new ouffall will be constructed to replace the old 78♦nch-diameter ouffall(No.002). All on-shore elements of this replacement project have already been completed and were done in concertwith the major improvements to the Highway 1 Bridge expansion and the Santa Ana River Flood Control Project Improvements and the rebuilding of the Huntington Beach Wetlands. The ocean portions of the ouffall will be addressed in a future planning study with a separate environmental review process. The current plan also includes the addition of a valve station connecting Ouffalls 001 and 002 downstream of the surge towers,construction of an additional effluent booster station annex and the above mentioned outfall extension. The project will also involve demolition, piping,valving,control equipment installation and instrumentation. Overall the project costs are estimated to be in the range of $5.546 million. A specific breakdown of estimated project costs for the various project elements is presented in Table 1 while Table 2 provides a breakdown of costs as they related to materials and construction activities that influence the nature of the impacts on material resources and specific activities. Table 1 Estimated Cost of Various Project Elements DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST dollars Yard work north $1,177,000 Yard work south 938,000 Modification of existing surge tower 60,000 New Sur eTower 814,000 Valve Box No. 1 1,982,000 Valve Box No.2 197.000 Valve Box No.3 8 4 232,000 Valve Box No.5 (modify) 104,000 Electrical instrumentation 90,000 Total $5,594,000 Different hydraulic scenarios were developed and evaluated to determine the transient water surface levels that could occur. These established the needed heights for the surge towers. The maximum water surface level was shown to reach 96 feet. This is higher than the crest of the existing tower(Surge Tower No.2, which is 88 feet)and could cause it to overflow. Depending upon pump start-up times allowed (from 45- 600 seconds)the water surface elevation varies from 92-96 feet. It was recommended that a maximum height of 98 feet be established for the new surge tower No. 1 to replace the older Surge Tower No. 1 which is only 55.5 feet tall (elevation 69 feet). Also, Surge Tower No.2,with a present height of 76.5 feet (elevation 88 feet) would be extended to a height of 98 feet at a later dale. -6- The recommended surge tower changes are based on the assumption that anew ocean outfall will be constructed in the future to replace the existing short outfall No.001 which was removed from service in 1971 when a new 1204nch diameter ocean outfall extending five miles offshore was constructed. Table 2 Costs of Major Components of Project (ENR 7000) DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED COST Sitework $1,210,000 Concrete 1,299 000 Metals 482,000 Wood and Plastics 13,000 Thermal and Moisture 4,000 Protection Pumps 23,000 Special Construction 253,000 Piping,Valves,Gates and 90,000 Specialties Source: John Carollo Engineers,Duane Jensen,personal communication,September,1994. \� The two existing surge towers lie side-by-side and are accessed by a single stairway and connecting bridge. Due to the presence of major seismic faults in the area,the decision was made to construct new Surge Tower No. 1 about 400 feet south of its present location. This will require that new access for the two surge towers be constructed. Four alternative means of access to the tops of the surge towers were evaluated(stairs,caged ladders, personnel manlift and ladders with safety restraints). Based on the convenience to personnel and safety issues,stairs were recommended by the consulting engineers as the preferred alternative. Further discussion of the various alternatives considered for the projects is contained in Chapter 7. 2.3 Project Characteristics The project characteristics,detailed evaluation of alternatives and their costs and technical merits and other details involved in the planning and selection of the proposed project were documented in a series of Design Memoranda prepared for the Districts by John Carollo Engineers(JCE, 1994). These were used as a basis for defining the project characteristics and evaluating various alternatives. 3.0 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 3.1 Summary A"Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures" (Table A of Executive Summary) has been provided to facilitate the certification process of this supplement The mitigation measures shown are recommended for adoption and which may require either project modification or the fulfillment of specific conditions in order to satisfy statutory obligations for the requisite components of an environmental impact report- -7- The Outfall Reliability project,(Job No.J-34-1)will be under construction for a time frame of approximately 12 months which includes all elements from removal of existing landscaping to testing of new equipment. 3.2 Areas of Controversy The proposed new surge tower will be highly visible, but should not adversely impact the viewshed when construction is completed. It will be about ten feet higher than the highest existing surge tower. There are telephone poles and palm bees in the area that are of a similar height(See Figure 5). An aerial view of the project with a computerized simulation of the visual impact of the proposed project to put it in perspective with the other features of the area is show in Figure 6. 4.0 RELATED PROJECTS The only related project that is being planned is the outfall extension for replacement and/or extension of the old 784nch diameter ocean outfall to handle flows expected to exceed existing outfall capacity by the year 2005. 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES OF POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 5.1 Earth 5.1.1 Environmental Setting Quaternary alluvial, cotluvial and non-marine terrace deposits are found throughout the Coastal Plain. During the last two or three million years these deposits have resulted in accumulation of sediments in the lower BAR.Surface deposits consist of fine sand, silt and clay underlain by permeable coarse sand and gravel. The Plant No.2 site lies adjacent to the mouth of the Santa Ana River at an elevation of about twelve feet �as� above sea level. The site is relatively flat except for man-made structures which include levees and walls for flood protection and drainage,landscaped mounds for visual screening of facilities,and excavated sludge drying beds. The area is underlain by soil of the Bolsa-Hueneme Association which include the Hueneme,Metz,and Bolsa soils at the site. Properties of these soils are listed in Orange Countys 1978 Soil Survey(U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1978). The qualities of these soil types at the site have been assessed by on- site investigations to determine engineering needs to assure structural integrity of the planned structures (CCOC, 1994). The undisturbed surface soils at the site are primarily Bolas soils,which are a silt or silly clay loam ranging in depth to 69 inches. Tidal flats and peat bogs historically covered the site and were eventually covered over with alluvium of the BAR. Soils at Plant No.2 have been extensively modified by ongoing construction and on-site burial of screenings and grit Soils in the area overlie what was originally peat bog,thus construction has required extensive foundation work under some structures. The project would involve excavation to depths of 35 feet below the existing grade in soft to firm clays and silts with medium dense silty sands which overly the Orange County Coast Plain. The Plain consists of a structural depression filled with rocks and alluvium from the Santa Ana River which have been modified by differential subsidence and uplifting (Yerkes,at al 1965). Sediment overlies the bedrockwhich ranges in thickness from hundreds to thousands of feet. No unique geological features have been identified other than the presence of the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone which cuts directly across the Plant No.2 site (See Figure 3)creating fault segments with high activity and moderate activity as one moves further from the fault line. l -6- Seismicity The project area has one local active fault zone. The Newport-Inglewood structural zone extends from forty miles offshore near Dana Point,inland through the City of Newport Beach to the Cheviot Hills in Los Angeles County. The Newport-Inglewood fault zone has displaced all rock older than the alluvial and littoral deposits and created a barrier to the movement of groundwater(Poland, 1959). The project area is located in a seismically active region.Major fault zones capable of inducing seismic hazards in the project area include: the San Andreas Fault Zone approximately 30 miles to the northeast; the San Jacinto Fault Zone;the Whittier-Elsinore Fault Zone; and the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone on the southerly edge of the study area adjacent to the coastal areas between Laguna Beach and Corona Del Mar. With the exception of the Whittier-Elsinore Fault, all of these major fault zones have been evaluated as active and designated as Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones. However,the Newport-Inglewood Special Study Zone extends-only as far south as Huntington Beach, about seven miles northwest of the Santa Ana River(California Division of Mines and Geology, 1976). Other potentially active fault zones located within 60 miles of the study area include the San Gabriel-Sierra Madre and the El Modino-Norwalk Fault Zones(Ploessel at al, 1972 and CCOC, 1994). 5.1.2 Project Impacts The general nature of impacts is best indicated for this project by the amount of excavation and demolition that will occur. The project will entail the excavation of old pipes and installation of larger pipes as well as demolition of the old surge tower and construction of a new one. The valve boxes will require excavation. New pipe and concrete will be required for the new structures. Construction would involve the excavation of soils to allow the installation of pipelines and valves and the foundation for the new surge tower and demolition of the old facilities being replaced. There will be some changes in geological substructures within the plant boundary in a very confined area. Some of the excavated material would be used locally(some of it would be stockpiled at the back of the Treatment `J Plant No.2 site for later use as backfill if it was found to be suitable). All excess excavated material will be trucked off of the treatment plant site. A geotechnical study completed by CCOC for the Districts contained recommendations which were used by the project design engineers in the design of the proposed facilities. These recommendations addressed a number of potential impacts including seismic safety,liquefaction,settling,groundwater uplifting that could Boat structures and the need for supporting piles for the surge tower. Table 3 provides a summary of construction-related impacts in terms of demolition and excavation requirements along with the import of new materials(mainly concrete) for each project element. These impact indicator also serve as the basis for estimating air pollutant emissions and construction activi0es such as noise and traffic. Table 3 Construction Impacts Indicator Summary ITEM (cubic PIPING SURGE VALVE TOTALS yards) TOWER BOXES Excavation 4152 570 1165 5887 Concrete 171 300 0 471 Demolition New Concrete 710 600 958 2268 TOTALS I 5033 1470 2123 8626 -9- < « _ yw \< d• \ � �^ ƒ$ » �K - 2 � k � ^ om wmm a t � a ML zo r � O � 0 � r� ;ti � �� . • 5 J � ', .jai .1/ - • 3 crr ' Z CD t � • f Local topography would be temporarily altered due to stockpiling of soils. Disturbed areas would be subjected to Increased wind erosion and potential water erosion during the construction period expected to last about 4-5 months. The shore trench method is the construction method proposed for emplacement of the pipelines. Excavation and construction phases normally result in some erosion and siltation, particularly when materials have been stockpiled. The resulting sedimentation and siltation from any rainfall during construction is not expected to leave the treatment plant she and enter the adjacent Santa Ana River or any storm drains. The construction schedule recommended calls for construction activities to occur during dry periods. A estimated 5880 cubic yard of soil will have to be excavated to accommodate the removal of the old pipe and allow for installation of the new larger pipe and valves and new surge tower. Of this total,about 30 percent will be backfilled and the remainder removed and stockpiled on the treatment plant site for use as fill. Finding a suitable location for the fill material will be the responsibility of the contractor working with the Districts engineering staff. Seismicity Active fault zones,defined as faults which have moved in recent geologic time (up to approximately 10,000 years ago),include those which are likely to move again. Potentially active faults(defined as those which, based upon available data, no known historical ground surface rupturing or earthquakes have occurred) which would show strong indications of geologically recent activity. The fault zones represent a strip one- eight of a mile wide on each side of the surface trace of the faults identified as active or potentially active and having moderate activity compared to high activity. The location of facilities subject to ground shaking and seismic events is not expected to pose a serious 1 / threat to the operational facilities once constructed or reinforced. Construction techniques will require that `✓ all facilities are constructed appropriately to reduce the impacts of anticipated seismic events. In the event of earthquake-induced ground shaking, some liquefaction and differential settlement would be anticipated to occur. 5.1.3 Mitigation Measures Excavation work will be done to assure safety and performed in the manner set forth in the operation rules, orders, and regulations prescribed by the CALIOSHA Construction Safety Orders through the specifications that must be followed by the contractor. For all open excavations which are 5 feet or deeper,the contractor will be required to obtain a permit from the applicable agency as required by California Labor Code 6424. Also,for all trenches 5 feet or more in depth,the contractor will be required to prepare and submit to the District a detailed plan showing the design of sharing, bracing, and sloping or other provisions to be made for worker protection as required by California Labor Code 6422. The contractor will be required to provide and maintain at all times during construction ample means and devices which will promptly remove and properly dispose of all water from any source entering the excavations or other parts of the work. The contractor will also be required to comply with the provisions of the Districts'NPDES permit in disposing of water from the work. During the course of construction,all concrete pipe removed will be either hauled to an approved disposal site,or resued. Effective dust control will also be maintained throughout the job by the contractor. Use of water or dust palliative will comply with standard specifications. -10- Geotechnical studies have been conducted as part of the detailed design prepared for the construction of the facilities by Converse Consultants Orange County (CCOC) under contract to the Districts. CCOC had several specific recommendations which are summarized below: \� 1. The subsurface soils extending to a depth of about 35 feet are not suitable for support of heavily loaded structures without the potential for detrimental settlement occurring. The surge tower soils must be bypassed with a piled foundation while the more lightly loaded vault may be supported over the natural soils by use of a mat type of foundation underlain by 2 feet of properly compacted fill consisting of imported clean sand or crushed stone. 2. Shallow groundwater conditions will require dewatering during construction and will exert uplift pressures on the improvements after construction,thus design features must take into account features to resist this uplift. Cast-in-place piles are not considered feasible and it was recommended that pre-cast concrete(driven) piles be provided. They can be installed without predrilling. However,during pile driving monitoring of existing nearby structures should be undertaken to detect any possible adverse effects from vibration.As an alternative, steel pipe of"H"piles installed by vibrating hammers could be used. These would cause less of an areal disturbance. All driven concrete piles should be at least 40 feet below the surge tower elevation (Elevation -7.00). At least two indicator piles should be driven to evaluate driving resistance,vibration, method of installation,and penetration into the bearing layer. 3. Pipelines connecting structures should have flexible connection to provide for groundwater level changes and subsequent uplift pressures or shrinkage along with potential seismic events, All of these recommendations and others have been evaluated and incorporated into the project design by John Carollo Engineers with detailed review being given by the District's Engineering Department. 5.1.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts No unavoidable adverse Impacts on geological resources are anticipated. 5.2 Air Quality 5.2.1 Environmental Setting The Districls'service area and the treatment plant site lies in the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD),which has some of the worst air quality in the country. The control of air pollutant emissions is a very important aspect of any project. The 1989 Master Plan EIR(Jones and Stokes Associates, 1989)contained a detailed estimate of emissions associated with implementation of the Master Plan. The emissions associated with the construction of all of the proposed projects were found not to have significance on a regional or local scale. The emissions for each project for which a permit is required must be evaluated as part of the permitting process. This is done routinely at the Districts for all projects. This project will not change air emissions and,therefore,does not require a Permit to Construct from the SCAQMD. More detailed information on regional air quality,which is still applicable today,was presented In the Final EIR adopted for the Master Plan. 5.2.2 Project Impacts The largest potential impact on air quality would be related to pipeline construction involving excavation and earth moving along with the transportation requirements to bring workers and materials to the site and to -11- haul off surplus earth. These activities will emit dust and air pollutant emissions well in excess of those which normally occur. Heavy construction equipment such as trucks,tractors,scrapers, backhoes,and other equipment powered by internal combustion engines will emit a few pounds per day of various air pollutants. Based on standard emission factors for this type of equipment the estimated emissions would be as shown in Table 4. Table 4 Average Emission Factors for Heavy Construction Equipment (pounds per hour per piece of equipment) Pollutant Emission Factor Carbon Monoxide 0.760 Exhaust Hydrocarbons 0203 Nitrogen Oxides as Nitrogen Dioxide 2.871 RCHO as HCHO 0.049 Sulfur Oxides as Sulfur Dioxide 0205 Particulates 0.158 Source:Golden,et al, 1979 and South Coast Air Quality Management District, 1992. Emissions from construction equipment were estimated using emission factors based on the use of diesel-- fueled equipment and the amount of soil which must be excavated. These estimates are shown in Table 5 for the average day and for the entire intensive 30 day period over which peak excavation activity is expected to occur. Added to these emissions will be those associated with hauling surplus material off site and bringing materials to the site which may be extensive for short periods of time such as when concrete is being poured. it is estimated that as many as 250-860 truck trips may be required to complete the job requirements. Table 5 Emissions Associated with Demolition, Excavation and Hauling of Materials CONTAMINANT AVERAGE DAY 30 DAY PERIOD (pounds per day) totalpounds) Particulates 111 3333 Carbon Monoxide 3.8 19 Hydrocarbons reactive 1.3 6.3 Oxides of Nitrogen 14.3 71.5 Oxides of sulfur 1.02 5.1 Assumptions: 5,000 cubic yards of soil excawted;475 cubic yards of concrete excavated and 2300 cubic yards of new connate delivered M the sxe with an average mun ltrip hauling distance of 12 miles. This source of air pollution is very minor compared to the overall regional air pollution burden. Vehicles used by workers and vehicles moving equipment and supplies to the site and those used for hauling off excavated materials were calculated in the overall Master Plan impact assessment done in 1989. In this particular case,the emissions from construction workers will be relatively minor since it is estimated that the �a✓ -12- full-time workforce will only average about 25 workers for the year. This project would represent about 1/13th of the impacts previously reported for the average on-going emissions associated with construction workers. Vehicular emissions during construction would be relatively minor on a regional scale. It is estimated that the construction period would last for approximately 12 months with an intensive 320-day period for excavation,demolition and concrete placement. This temporary construction activity may result in localized air quality degradation and contribute to the increase in emissions within the air shed. Such emissions are certainly not expected to cause any deterioration of air quality which would cause exceedance of existing applicable standards. Overall regional air quality and long-term compliance with standards is not expected to be adversely affected by this project either directly or Indirectly. The soils investigation at the site has indicated no natural organics(peat, etc.)which may give rise to odors (H,S and other organic gases)during deep excavation. 5.2.3 Air Quality Mitigation Measures Both dust and gaseous pollutant emissions can be reduced by simple control methods. During excavation, watering should occur on a daily basis as needed for dust suppression. As previously slated,watering on a regular basis(i.e.,two to four times per day)can reduce dust emissions by about 50 percent. Gaseous pollutant emissions from vehicles can be reduced by the use of well tuned and properly maintained equipment. Stockpiles of soil on site should be wetted as needed to control dust. An alternative for semipermanent storage is the use of dust suppressant materials sprayed on the piles. 5.3 Hydrology and Water Quality. 5.3.1 Environmental Setting The Santa Ana River is the major natural drainage for the watershed and it flows past both the Districts' treatment plants adjoining one of its leveed channels. This river represents a major flood threat to the highly developed coastal flood plain encompassing 100,000 acres containing about a million residents. To provide flood protection for both treatment plants,the Districts rely on the levee of the river for flood protection. A major flood control protection and improvement project for the river has recently been completed along its lower reaches(County of Orange, 1989). The Districts'proposed project has been planned with consideration for the structural integrity of the levees and to assure that all the proposed improvements are compatible with the completed facilities. Groundwater underlying Plant No.2 was encountered in borings done by CCOC at a depth of about 20 feet. This is lower than previous records indicate,and this may be due to the extended drought or the ongoing dewatering that is being done for construction of new secondary treatment facilities In the area adjoining the proposed project site. Flood protection for Plant No.2 is provided by a recently constructed 12-foot wall which surrounds much of the plant site. This wall also serves as a visual noise barrier to buffer surrounding residential areas from plant operations. On-site drainage at the treatment plants is contained and carefully managed to assure that any potentially contaminated rainwaters are collected and pumped to the effluent disposal system. Drainage at the treatment plant consists of infiltration or runoff to the lowest point where it is collected and discharged to the ocean oultall. Groundwater levels are often high which requires dewatering during construction. Dewatering operations either pump water to the treatment plant or to on-site siltation basins prior to discharge to the SAR. Such a discharge is regulated by a special blanket NPDES Permit for dewatering issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). -13- The only water resources of concern,other than wastewater in need of conveyance between the two plants is the dewatering of groundwater during construction and flood waters,should they occur. 5.3.2 Project Impacts The proposed pipelines will parallel the river levee and will be constructed entirely within the District's existing treatment plant boundaries. Construction will require site dewatering for installation of the new pipeline. Proper dewatering procedures as specified in a blanket NPDES Permit for dewatering must be observed to minimize impacts on the Santa Ana River which may receive the dewatering flows after treatment. Another dewatering alternative is to route the settled flows to the treatment plant or ouNall via one of the existing effluent lines or the newly completed Interplant pipeline. In either case,it would be necessary for the contractor to comply with all rules and regulations of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board,Santa Ana Region and the California Department of Fish and Game for any surface water discharge. During the construction period,there are no anticipated times that effluent disposal operations will be impaired. This is critical since the District's NPDES permit prohibits bypassing of the ocean outfall or allowing wastewater to overflow into the Santa Ana River. It is not anticipated that any NPDES permit limitations cannot be met. Spills or bypasses to the Santa Ana River are considered unlikely since the Districts have an unblemished record in recent years of preventing discharges to the Santa Ana River from its emergency bypass. 5.3.3 Mitigation Measures A detailed dewatering plan will be developed and implementation and compliance made a part of the construction contract. 5.3.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts No unavoidable adverse impacts on water resources are anticipated. 5.4 Noise 5.4.1 Environmental Setting Day time noise levels in the residential community adjacent to Plant No.2 are in the range of 55 to 60 dB(A) while night time noise levels range from about 45 to 60 dB(A). Noise levels on Brookhurst Street immediately adjacent to Plant No.2 have been estimated to range from 65.5 to 69.0 dB(A) (median values) at a 50-foot distance from traffic(Ultrasystems,Inc., 1977). Noise levels at the treatment plant site Itself are highly variable depending on the level of construction activity. Treatment plant operations themselves do generate limited noise and,therefore,noisy processing equipment Is enclosed in buildings to prevent community noise problems. 5A.2 Project Impacts The implementation of the project will result in the generation of short-term noise attributable to the construction activities.The most significant noise source will be pile-driving. In recent years,the Districts have had extensive experience with piledriving operations and have developed contract provisions to minimize the adverse impacts. These measures include the acceleration of the work schedule to minimize the time that pile driving will occur,use of acoustical blankets to reduce noise generation,and noise level monitoring. Operational noise impacts will be negligible. -14- 5.42.1 Construction Related Impacts Construction noise levels will exceed background noise level by a considerable margin. The exact degree of impact on the surrounding community will depend upon the type of equipment used and hours of operation. However, noise levels associated with the construction are expected to range from 70 dB(A)to 105 dB(A)within 50 feet of the equipment being used. Equipment working at this site will not be near residential areas,therefore, it is unlikely that special precautions and mitigation will be required for construction activhties other than pile driving. 5.4.2.2 Operational Impacts The completed project will not generate operational noise that will contribute to increases in present levels. 5.4.3 Mitigation Measures All construction equipment shall be stored on or near the area under construction to eliminate daily heavy duty truck trips on vicinity roadways. All construction equipment,stationary or mobile,shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers,and all engines shall be kept in proper tune. Construction activities shall be restricted to the hours of 7 A.M:7 P.M.on weekdays and 9 A.M.-6 P.M.on Saturdays, as promulgated by the applicable local jurisdiction,also no construction shall be permitted outside of these hours or on Sundays or Federal holidays, unless a waiver has been granted by Project Manager. Any waiver shall take into account the impact upon the community. Noise levels should not exceed 65 dB(A)at the nearest residential property line as a result of construction activity except for short periods of time as provided in local ordinances. Noise levels should be monitored during construction to assure ordinance compliance and worker safety. On-site noise monitoring equipment will be used by the construction managers to assure compliance with the contract provisions which are specified. There should be measurements taken during the testing period for pile driving to measure noise levels at the District's property boundary adjoining the Santa Ana River and along Brookhurst Street. Based on the measurements made,appropriate measures should be taken as needed to assure that levels are in compliance with local ordinances. 5.4.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Unavoidable adverse impacts from noise generation of a short-term nature may be anticipated even after the implementation of mitigation measures due to the nature of pile-driving. The impact should be minor since only 80 piles must be driven. In the past several thousand piles have had to be driving for major projects much closer to residential areas at Reclamation Plant No. 1. 5.5 Aesthetics 5.5.1 Environmental Setting The visual resources in the study area are primarily those associated with an urbanized area. The treatment plant site is highly visible from Pacific Coast Highway and the Santa Ana River Trail. Land uses in the area of the proposed project consist of commercial,residential,open space and roadways and equestdanfjoggingAvalking and bicycle trails. -15- 5.5.2 Project Impacts - The only long-term visual impact will be associated with he relocation of one surge tower and height increase of the existing Surge Tower No.2. These height increases are not expected to create any �a.✓ significant adverse impacts that are significantly different than the visual environment which presently exists. Views of the proposed facilities(done by superimposing the proposed new facilities in existing photographs) have been show in Figures 5 and 6. 5.5.3 Mitigation Measures Landscaping will be done after construction is completed to re-establish landscaped areas impacted by construction. The work will be done as part of the Districts long-term Landscaping Master Plan. Excess earth will be removed from the plant site. 5.5.4 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts The only unavoidable adverse impacts as to aesthetic issues is the possible impact on views of some individuals which may be particularly sensitive to changes in the viewshed. This is not anticipated to be a significant impact. 6.0 GROWTH-INDUCING IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION Pursuant to Section 15126(g)of the State CEQA Guidelines,environmental impact reports shall include a discussion of the growth-inducing impacts of the proposed action,Including a discussion of"the ways that the proposed project could foster economic or population growth,or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly,in the surrounding environment". Growth-inducing impacts may also include actions which remove existing obstacles to growth. The 1 / evaluation of whether the proposed project will yield growth-inducing effects focuses on the �r.•✓ consideration of several factors,including an assessment of whether the project! Provides a potential for population in-migration to fill project-related employment opportunities which,in turn, could induce additional residential development; Results in an increased localized demand for goods and services at levels to induce additional commercial development; Results in the removal of economic,physical or political obstacles or constraints to development; and Facilitates peripheral development through the extension of services to areas presently void of those services. Short-term employment opportunities,associated with project design,development and construction, and long-term employment opportunities, associated with the expansion of the sewer infrastructure and the subsequent growth afforded the county and city service area in housing,commercial and industry will result from project implementation. Although,improvement and expansion of the outfall system is designed to accommodate projected growth in the county and city service areas,implementation of the proposed project will not in and of itself promote additional growth to the service areas. The actual hydraulic capacity of the proposed future addition to the ocean portion of the ouffall will be the project which would have a more direct influent on hydraulic capacity. However, it is generally the headworks and treatment facilities which are the most important _ influences on capacity ratings. -16- The overall growth-related issues associated with the Sanitation Districts'thirty-year Master Plan which includes some$2.5 billion in facility improvements(Including the proposed project)to provide for service area growth needs and wastewater collection,treatment,and disposallreclamation needs were addressed in a July 1989 Master Plan EIR(Jones and Stokes,Inc., 1989). Mitigation measures to be implemented by other agencies to reduce the Impacts of population growth and related impacts were identified. 7.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED ACTION CEQA Requirements The State CEQA Guidelines,in Section 15126(d),require that in addition to the proposed Project,a range of reasonable alternatives to the pending action be identified and evaluated which could feasibly the basic objectives of the Project Referencing the State CEQA Guidelines: The discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives capable of eliminating any significant adverse environmental effects or reducing them to a level of insignificance, even if these alternatives would impede to some degree the attainment of the pro%ect objectives, or would be more costly. A specific"no project"alternative is mandated by these Guidelines. In addition to the"no project" alternative,a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed Project are to be identified to foster informed decision-making. 7.1 Alternative 1: No Project This alternative would result in maintaining the project as previously approved. This alternative would create significant impacts to water quality since peak effluent flows could exceed the existing surge tower capacity resulting in an overflow event necessitating bypassing of effluent into the Santa Ana River via discharge point No.003. Therefore,the no project altemative is deemed environmentally unacceptable and would result In violation of the Districts'NPDES permit and possible fines of up to$25,000 a day for each incident. 7.2 Altemative 2: Alternative Configurations for Surge Towers There were a limited number of alternatives available for consideration for the surge tower replacement portion of the project. This is largely a result of the hydraulic requirements for pumping and the seismic safety considerations. Some existing facilities of a non-essential basis also influenced site selection to a minor degree. The two alternatives considered were a northern location at the site of the existing surge tower or closeby and the proposed location some 400 feet southerly towards the Pacific Ocean. The proposed advantages and disadvantages of these two alternatives are summarized in Table 6. -17- Table 6 Alternatives for Placement of Sur a Tower 1 ' ALTERNATIVE ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES North Location (replace in same 1. Closer to pump stations 1. Closer to high activity level vicinity) faults 2. Does not interfere with existing truck deluge station 2. Some operators for valves would have to be below grade 3. Less visual Impacts. and designed for traffic loads 3. Requires modification to some fencing at the liquid oxygen facility 4. Would require removal of ro one tacit' South Location (proposed location 1. Further from high activity 1. Further from pump stations 400 feet south) level faults 2. Requires removal of existing 2. Mechanical operators for truck deluge station valves can be above grade for easier maintenance The final recommendation to move the surge tower south was prompted by the findings of the geolechnical report. Because it would be less susceptible to damage (being further away)the southern location is environmentally superior to the northern location since it would have a greater likelihood of preventing adverse water quality impacts.. 8.0 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USES OF MAN'S ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY Development of the project as proposed,and the cumulative and long-term effects associated with the development,will result in the up-grading of the current ouffall infrastructure and provide a higher degree of reliability for meeting treatment plant disposal needs as well as to upgrade seismic safety and operational and maintenance requirements. Because the pipeline and valves will be underground there will be no reduction in open space acreage. Previous development activities on the site or other influences associated with human habbation have previously Impacted the biological significance of all of the subject property through a reduction of plant and animal diversification thus no biological resources will be impacted as a result of this project. Project Implementation will not impose constraints which would narrow the range of beneficial uses of the environment or pose long-term risks to public health and safety. 9.0 ANY SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES WHICH WOULD BE INVOLVED IN THE PROPOSED ACTION SHOULD IT BE IMPLEMENTED Development of the project area represents a long-term commitment of additional infrastructure to an urbanized use. Since the project site was previously developed, no significant impacts to vegetation, biota or natural drainage features within the site areas are expected. -1s- Implementation of the proposed project, and its cumulative impacts will further involve the use of fossil fuel, steel,concrete,and other natural resources which when once utilized represent either an irretrievable loss or depletion of those resources and materials. 10.0 AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED Regional Agencies SCAG Mr.Eric Roth, Manager Intergovernmental Review 818 West Seventh Street, 12th Floor Los Angeles,CA 90017 State Agencies State Water Resources Control Board Wayne Hubbard Division of Clean Water Programs P.O. Box 944213 Sacramento,CA 94244-2120 California Coastal Commission,South Coast Area Robin Maloney-Ramos,Coastal Program Analyst II 245 W. Broadway,Suite 380 Long Beach,CA 908024416 Department of Transportation District 12-Advance Planning Branch Robert Joseph, Chief 2501 Pullman Street Santa Ana,CA 92705 State Clearinghouse Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento,CA 95814 County Agencies County of Orange- Environmental Management Agency Planning, Kad A.Rigoni,Senior Planner For: Robert W.White, Manager Environmental Planning Division P.O.Box 4048 Santa Ana, CA 92702-4048 Local Agencies Orange County Water District Mr.Charles Steinbergs P.O. Box 8300 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8300 City of Newport Beach John Douglos, Environmental Coordinator 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach,CA 92659-1768 -19- City of Costa Mesa Kristen Petros Planning Division 77 Fair Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Costa Mesa Sanitary District Bob Harriers 234 E. 17th Street 9205 Costa Mesa,CA 92627 Others John Carollo Engineers Dwayne Jenson,Project Engineer 311 S. Harbor Blvd,Suite 210 Santa Ana, CA 92704 11. REFERENCES Archaeological Research,Inc., 1975. Letter Report on Archaeological Survey at CSDOC Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2. Prepared for J.B. Gilbert&Associates as part of a Supplemental EIR for Improved Treatment at Plant No.2(State Clearinghouse No.7411404). Brown and Caldwell, 1987. Central Power Generation Systems-County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, CSDOC Job J-19., February. California Department of Fish and Game, 1980. "At the Crossroads 1980-A Report on California's Endangered and Rare Fish and Wildlife." Canter,L.W., 1977. Environmental Impact Assessment.McGraw-Hill, Inc. Carollo-Boyle Engineers, 1989. "Draft Colledction,Treatment,and Disposal Facilities Master Plan" CSDOC Masterplan for Joint Works Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Facilities." February County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1972. Interim Flood Hazard Analysis. Report and Environmental Impact Statement on Flood Retention Wall. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, 1973. Flood Hazard Analysis. Report. Jones&Stokes Associates, Inc. 1989. Program Environmental Impact Report on Collection,Treatment, and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. Draft (Part 1 Treatment and Disposal Facilities) (Part 2 on Collection Facilities was done by Widen Associates) _Sacramento,CA. Prepared for: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,Fountain Valley, March. Jones&Stokes Associates, Inc. 1989. Program Environmental Impact Report on Collection,Treatment, and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. Final. Sacramento,CA(JSA 88-050). Prepared for: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,Fountain Valley,CA.July. K. P. Lindstrom&Associates, 1985. Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report.County Sanitation Districts of Orange County March, K.P. Lindstrom &Associates, 1985 Joint Treatment Works Wastewater Master Plan Final Environmental Impact Report,County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,June. -20- K.P.Lindstrom and Associates, 1987 . Draft Supplement to Joint Works Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report.County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,August. K.P. Lindstrom and Associates, 1987 . Final Supplement to Joint Works Wastewater Master Plan Environmental Impact Report.County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,October. Keith,R.W., 1980. "A Climatological/Air Quality Profile-South Coast Air Basin."South Coast Air Quality Management District, November, p.165. Malcolm Pirnie, 1984c. "Special Study Report-Odor Situation Assessment and Recommended Plan- Executive Summary for Plant No. 1 and Plant No.2." November. Pulaski and Arita,Achkecls, Incorporated. 1987. Treatment Plant No.2 Master Plan Report. March. Rau,J.C.and Wooten,D.C.(Editors), 1980. Environmental Impact Analysis Handbook,McGraw-Hill Book Company.Inc.. South Coast Air Quality Management District, 1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook(Updated, November from May 1992 Draft). Diamond Bar,CA. U.S.Department of Agriculture, 1978. "Soil Survey of Orange County and Western Part of Riverside County." Completed by Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service in cooperation with the University of California Agriculture Experiment Station. U.S.Department of Agriculture, 1978. 'Boil Survey of Orange County and Western Portion of Riverside County,California." U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, 1976. "Direct Environmental Factors at Municipal Wastewater Treatment Works Evaluation and Control of Site Aesthetics,Air Pollutants, Noise and Other Operation and Construction Factors." EPA-430/9-76-003,January, p. 104. -21- JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 9, 1994 DISTRICT 1 Agenda Item 28: Consideration of actions pertaining to request from City of Santa Ana to waive $245,913.00 capital facilities connection charge for Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Santa Ana, between West Fourth and Fifth Streets and Broadway and Ross Avenues Summary This item has been continued from the October 12, 1994 Board Meeting. Attached is a Staff Report dated November 3, 1994 that provides information on the request in detail. �wx9szs.i i os sa -1- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS _ November 3, 1994 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1O aws>yENll2 P 0.W.e127 STAFF REPORT rouaraw v0urr,rJlR rVWAS T2ae127 014111622 11 Request from City of Santa Ana to Waive Capital Facilities Connection Charges for Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse District No. 1 has received a request from the City of Santa Ana dated September 23, 1994,to waive the connection fees for the new federal building and courthouse to be located in downtown Santa Ana (see attached supporting agenda material). Construction is scheduled to begin in December with completion scheduled for March 1997. Based on the current District No. 1 Capital Facilities Connection Charge of $470 per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area,the connection fee would be$245,913.40 for this 523,220 square foot facility. Sewer connection fees are used by District No. 1 to pay for facilities required to serve a development, including the District No.1 collection system that transports the wastewater to the jointly-owned and operated treatment plants,and District No. 1's share of the joint treatment plant facilities required to serve the development and to comply with increasingly strict environmental requirements. There is one exception in the uniform ordinance,which is stated as follows: "Except as may be provided by an individual District,there will be no capital facilities connection charges assessed to local(emphasis added)govemmenf agencies for connecting drectly(District sewer)or indirectly(City ssewer)to Districts'sewerage factlifies;however, a connection permit must be obtained." General Counsel advises that since a federal facility does not quality under the above exception,any request for a waiver of fees submitted to the District No. 1 Board of Directors would require notice, hearing and adoption of an amendment to the ordinance. As a matter of background,Districts'staff has approved a no-fee permit to the City of Santa Ana for the connection of the Cky's new 12-inch sewer line in Fifth Street that will flow easterly and connect to the Districts'trunk sewer in Broadway. R is our understanding that it will provide service to several existing connections belonging to local government entities and to private entities,as well as the new federal building and courthouse. The permit requirements state,in part,that: Applicant must adhere to County Sanitation District No. 1 Ordinance No. 119, effective February 7, 1992 or as may be amended by the District No. 1Board (emphasis added). . :' The District No. 1 Directors have two basic alternatives: 1. Receive,file and reject the request to waive Capital Facilities Connection Charges for the new federal building and courthouse because federal facilities do not qualify under the existing District Uniform Ordinance for an exception to the District No. 1 connection fees;or 2. Establish a date and notice a future hearing to consider amending the District No. 1 Uniform Ordinance regarding Capital Facilities Connection Charges to grant the request for exemption. wptlxlyCcaC�26nw.x MAYOR Daniel H.Young MAYOR PRO TEM CITY OF SA N TA A N A r Miguel A.Pulido I CILMEMBERS nas E.Lutz r ALL-AMERICA CITY 1982-83 111,9ricia A.McGuigan Lisa Mills _ COY MANAGER Ted R Moreoo David N.Ream Robert L.Richardson CITY ATTORNEY Edward 1.Cooper CLERK OF THE COUNCIL lance C.Guy ED In the Office of the Secralary September 23, 1994 Nots County Sa nit Distrwhs) Board of Directors, District No. 1 OCT1121994 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County By Air P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Board of Directors: SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SEWER CONNECTION FEES FOR NEW FEDERAL COURTHOUSE The new Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse will be located in downtown Santa Ana on a site between West Fourth and Fifth Streets and Broadway and Ross. The project mission statement states that this facility will "provide the ideal United ..i States Courthouse in Santa Ana to house the Federal Judiciary of the Central District of California, serving the needs of the people of Orange County. " Construction of this project is scheduled to begin in December of this year with completion estimated in March 1997. The new courthouse facility will contain 492,500 square feet of gross floor area with 347,000 square feet of occupiable floor area. The building will initially contain 14 courtrooms with room for expansion to a maximum of 29 courtrooms. A total of 214 on-site parking spaces will be provided. Federal funding for the new courthouse is extremely tight. The project has been engineered to provide the best possible facility for Orange County within the budget constraints. In order to meet these constraints, the Federal Government has requested that all development fees for this project be waived. The City has agreed to forego all City plan check, park, sewer connection, and related fees for this project. The City cannot, however, waive the County Sanitation District No. 1 facilities connection charge. This District is the only agency empowered to waive this fee. Based upon 347,000 square feet of occupied floor area at the current connection fee of $470 per 1, 000 square feet, this charge amounts to $163, 010. �J 20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA• P.O.BOX 1988 SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE(714)647-69(10 FAX(714)647-6954 Board of Directors - 2 - September 23, 1994 ° At the request of the United States of America General Services Administration, the City of Santa Ana asks that the Board of Directors for County Sanitation District No. 1 waive the facility connection charge for the new Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse. This request is made because of funding constraints and the tremendous economic and service benefits this facility will provide for Orange County. Thank you for consideration of this request. I look forward to receiving your timely response. Sincerely, e 1 Youn Mayor a JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING . � AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 9, 1994 DISTRICT 3 Agenda Item 31 : Consideration of motion to receive and file Project Report on Improvements to Miller- Holder Sewer System, Contract No. 3-38, prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation; approve Alternate No. 1 of said report, which divides the project into three reaches; and authorize preparation of plans and specifications for Contracts Nos. 3-38-1, 3-38-2 and 3-38-3. Summary Attached is a copy of the Project Report that describes the proposed projects in detail, as well as a Staff Report dated November 3, 1994. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends consideration of motions to receive and file the Project Report prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation, and directing staff and Boyle Engineering Corporation to proceed with preparation of plans and specifications for Alternate No. 1, dividing Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Contract No. 3-38, into three separate projects: Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 1 (Rostrata Avenue to 5,800 feet North of Rosecrans Avenue); Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 2 (5,800 feet North of Rosecrans Avenue to Imperial Highway), Contract No. 3-38-2; and Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 3 (Beach Boulevard to Harbor Boulevard), Contract No. 3-38-3. wodx�ydass 1109.94 -1- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Y ' losaA EUIs AVENUE November 3, 1994 PO BOX 2127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.MIFOPNIA 927294121 `J plal%22an STAFF REPORT Receive and File Proiect Report for Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System. Contract No. 3-38 In February 1994 the Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation to prepare a design report, plans and specifications, and to provide construction support services for replacement of deficient trunk sewers along the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer system in District No. 3. The 1989 Master Plan identified certain reaches of these sewers, mostly in Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway in the cities of La Habra, Fullerton, La Mirada and Buena Park, as being deficient. The project report identified the sewer service area showing all the tributary areas from the various cities which feed into this trunk sewer system. It also identified three alternatives to addressing the deficiencies in the system. The report recommends selecting Alternative No. 1, replacing the existing Beach Relief Trunk Sewer portion of the system in its present alignment, for a total estimated cost of$2,106,000. The report also recommends splitting the overall project into three phases to properly interface with the Beach Boulevard and the Imperial Highway"Smart Street' projects which are being managed by Caltrans, OCTA and the City of La Habra. Alternatives 2 and 3, with estimated costs of$1,638,000 and $1,434,000, respectively, parallel the existing system using variations of the alignment along Rostrata, Artesia, Franklin and Kingman Streets prior to reaching Beach Boulevard. The recommended Altemative No. 1 results in the lowest maintenance costs. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the project report, and direct staff and the consultant to proceed with final design of Alternative No. 1. xyexbxas�s-ITsa.s< ,. Improvements to MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM Contract No. 3-38 PROJECT REPORT County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County October1994 /304JLE 1501 Quail Street Newport Beach, CA 92658-9020 r Improvements to MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER SYSTEM Contract No. 338 PROJECT REPORT r Prepared for: County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County r r Prepared by: Boyle Engineering Corporation r Project Manager Philip E. Stone,PE Project Engineer Jesus Lopez,PE r r QpoFESS/ON GENF r No.C17714T A 7 � CIVIL � r OF CAUFOQ� OC-CO3-200-00 October 1994 /71✓L/� 1501 Quail Street. Newport Beach. CA 92660 r r Table of Contents Executive Summary...................................................................I ExecutiveSummary.....................................................................2 r Introduction........................___._......__..._..._.................._......� Introduction.........................._................. ...............4 ProjectLocation.....................................................................4 r Project Objective...................................................................4 Assignment.........._................................................................4 r DesignFlows..................................................................5 r Design Flows................................................................................6 Service Area Description.......................................................6 r Land Use Modifications........................................................6 PeakingFactor.......................................................................7 r Design Flow Considerations...................._............................7 Design Flows and Pipe Sizing...............................................9 ImperialHighway...........................................................9 r Beach Boulevard Replacement.......................................9 Artesia/Rostrata to Kingman/Tulare Alternatives........10 r r r DesignAnalysis...........................-----------------___--------_.11 DesignAnalysis...................................................................12 Alignment......................................................................12 r Rostrata Avenue to Tulare Street..................................13 Tulare Street to Beach Boulevard at Stage Road..........13 Beach Boulevard, Stage Road to 1,030 Feet South of Rosecrans Avenue.........................................................14 r Beach Boulevard, 1,030 Feet South of to 1,200 Feet North of Rosecrans Avenue..........................................14 Beach Boulevard, 1,200 Feet North of Rosecrans " Avenue to Imperial Highway........................................14 Imperial Highway.........................................................15 Traffic Control During Construction..._..............................15 Artesia Avenue................................................_............16 r Kingman Avenue........................_................._.............16 TulareStreet..............._.................................................16 DoddsAvenue...............................................................17 StageRoad....................................................................17 r Beach Boulevard.........................._...............................17 ImperialHighway....._........_........................................18 r Profile............................__................._...............................19 DesignCriteria..............................................................19 r Pipelines.................................................................19 Manholes.............................................................19 r Utilitiesand Permits................................................................20 _ Utilities and Permits...................................................................21 Permits................................................._..............................22 r r V YN Project Schedule.............„„„.„..».„„»..„»...__.._„..»»......„„..23 r Project Schedule.........................................................................24 r Opinion of Probable Construction Cost.................»».„.»„„»25 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost.....................................26 r Conclusion................................................................................28 Conclusions................................................................................29 Appendix A Alignment Alternative Memo Appendix B Hydraulic Computer Model Output r r r List of Exhibits r Follows Exhibit Title Pape 1 Location Map..................................................................4 2 1989 Land Use Plan......................................................10 r 3 Sewer Service Ares.......................................................10 4 Sewer Service Area.......................................................10 r 5 Hydraulic Model Schematic .........................................10 6 Hydraulic Model Schematic.........................................10 7 Project Design Flows&Replacement Sewer Sizes......10 r 8 Project Schedule............................................................24 r s r r r r r Executive Summary r r BoWLE Executive Summary r Currently,the service area that is the subject of this project report is served by two parallel trunk sewer systems. The Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer system(Contract Nos.34B,34C,and 3-10)was constructed in the 1960's and incorporated sewers of the La Habra Purchase in Beach Boulevard. In the early 1970's the Beach Relief and Imperial Relief Trunk Sewers(Contract Nos.3-16 and 3-19)were constructed parallel to the Miller-Holder Trunk system with diversion structures to allow the two parallel trunk sewers to operate in conjunction with each other. The CSDOC 1989 Master Plan identified the Miller-Holder and Beach Relief Trunk Sewer system in need `tl of parallel or replacement sewers. This Project Report addresses the pwalieling and replacement of portions of the existing Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer and the Beach Relief and Imperial Relief Trunks. The existing sewers consist of approximately 32,000 linear feet of deficient 15-to 27-inch pipes. r This Project Report is the basis for design of the replacement or parallel sewers. As such,this report establishes the following: service area with land use update,design Flows,technical design criteria,pipeline alignment ,r within existing streets, preliminary pipe slopes, pipe sizing and alternatives,pipe materials, existing utilities, permitting requirements,anticipated schedule,and opinion of probable construction cost. The alignment for the project begins at the intersection of Artesia Boulevard and Rostrata Avenue,extends east on Artesia Boulevard to Kingman Avenue,then north on Kingman Avenue to Tulare Street.then east on Tulare Street and across the railroad tracks to Dodds Avenue,then northeast on Dodds Avenue to Stage Road,then east on Stage Road to Beach Boulevard,then northeast on Beach Boulevard to Imperial Highway,and then east on Imperial Highway to Harbor Boulevard. The project is located in the cities of Buena Park,La Mirada,La Habra and unincorporated county area. r For most of the project the concept proposed is for the new trunk sewer to take the alignment of one of the existing parallel sewers,usually the older Miller-Holder Trunk,resulting in the District still operating only two trunk sewers throughout the project area. This is the most cost effective from a construction standpoint and ,r on-going maintenance operations that will continue throughout the life of the facility,especially in view of the heavy traffic along Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway. The proposed project replaces the existing trunk with 21-through 39-inch parallel sewers at an estimated probable construction cost of 58.8 million. Implementation is planned with three construction contracts scheduled to place the project facilities in operation in the fall of 1996. The schedule for the first construction contract calls for completion of the 4,200 foot reach in Beach Boulevard from Imperial Highway southerly ahead of the street improvements along this reach planned to begin in the fall of 1995. The sewer improvements along Imperial Highway are scheduled to be completed r+ before construction of the"Smart Street"improvements currently planned for 1998. r 2 EN24JLE r r r Introduction r r r Bo�� Introduction Project Location The Improvements to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System are located in the Cities of La Habra,Buena Park and La Mirada in the northwest comer of Orange County. The location is shown on Exhibit 1. Project Objective The Districts' 1989"Collection,Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan" identified the need to provide additional capacity for the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer in Beach Boulevard,and Imperial Highway to serve the land uses planned for at the time of the master plan. The tributary service area includes a portion of the cities of Brea,Buena Park and Fullerton and all of the city of La Habra. Portions of the trunk sewer system in Beach Boulevard from north of Rosecrans Avenue to Imperial Highway date back to the 1920's. The remainder of the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer in this area(Contract Nos. 3-413 and 34C)were constructed in the early 1960's. In the early 1970's the Beach and Imperial Relief Trunk Sewers(Contract Nos.3-16 and 3-19)were constructed to provide additional capacity along Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway to serve the land uses that were planned at that time. r Assignment r The preparation of this Project Report is a portion of the work assignment detailed in a professional services agreement between Boyle Engineering Corporation(Boyle)and County Sanitation District No.3 of Orange County(District). The project concept,as presented by the District, is refined in this phase. Following phases will include preparation of construction documents and construction support services. This phase is intended to identify the requirements for the facilities. The Project Report discusses the following: O° • Land use changes from the 1989 master plan and design flows by pipeline reach • Pipeline alignment alternatives and alignment within streets • Preliminary pipeline profile and sizes • Design criteria • Existing utilities and permitting requirements • Anticipated schedule • Opinion of probable construction cost The investigations and conclusions of this project report will serve as the basis for preparation of the construction plans and specifications in the construction documents phase. r 4 r LOS A LES C"TY Y HAMA- . PROJECT LOCATION � ttlA lh �% T _ PAIN .1 �A tiAMTON i ►Art C T ALAYCW M4tTItNtT/t lYtltl IAA ` AY a.' s f01t1l1Y i ' INIIACIN YALLtY \ - r PACIFIC OCEAN C4W_ A tTINIII ( 51 IIt�lFatf O COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT 1 Design Flows SOWLE Design Flows r Service Area Description The study area encompasses approximately 7,038 acres representing the Cities of Buena Park,Fullerton,La " Habra,Brea,some unincorporated county area and is located entirely within District No.3. The Imperial Relief Interceptor,the upper reach of the Miller-Holder Trunk and the Beach Relief Interceptor drain into the lower Miller-Holder Trunk and Knott Interceptor,which in turn are tributary to Reclamation Plant No.2 in Huntington Beach. The 1989 Master Plan hydraulic models for the above trunks have been refined and utilized to aid in the design of the required replacement pipes. Exhibits 2 and 3 depict the drainage area boundary. r Land Use Modifications The 1989 Master Plan hydraulic models have been updated by modifying the land use designations of the Land Use Plan prepared for the 1989 CSDOC Master Plan for each of the cities within the study area. General Plans for the Cities of Buena Park,Fullerton,La Habra,and Brea were reviewed and compared to plans used for the r 1989 Master Plan. It was found that land use updates only occurred for the City of La Habra and resulted in a flow increase of 028 MGD(peak)for the upstream sections along Imperial Highway east of Harbor Boulevard and an increase of 0.32 MGD(peak) in the downstream sections located in the vicinity of Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway. Also,note that 0.08 MGD(average)of the increase in the downstream section of Imperial r Highway came from the La Habra Hills Specific Plan area that is being developed by the Chevron Land Development Company east of Idaho Street. Other land use changes in the southwest section of La Habra and tributary to Beach Boulevard,resulted in a decrease to 0.46 MGD average(from 1.01 MGD average). This r decrease was caused by a land use area change from low density residential to estate residential and open space (golf course)in the La Habra Hills development(see Exhibit 2,tributary 227 and 224). r The overall affects of these land use changes is an increase of flow along Imperial Boulevard which results in an increase in pipe size from 21 inches in diameter shown in the 1989 Master Plan to 24 inches and a flow decrease along Beach Boulevard due to the La Habra Hills Specific Plan development down zoning. r Identified on Exhibits 2 and 3 are the locations of the various land use designation changes,refined tributary areas,and sewer inflow locations. These identified land use designations where change has occurred are shown r, with their corresponding color designation(See the 1989 Land Use Plan for color coding). The tributary areas were refined with the use of sewer atlas maps and the addition of the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer to the hydraulic computer model along Imperial Highway between Beach Boulevard and Palm Street. This trunk is shown on Exhibit 4 and is made up of the 300 node numbering series. Also appended to the hydraulic computer model is Line E from the La Habra Purchase. Although Line E is not proposed to be maintained due to its age,it is included in the model to reflect the existing system and hydraulically link the trunk sewers together for consistency with the output of the 1989 Master Plan hydraulic computer model. Line E is shown on Exhibit 5 and is made up of the 700 node numbering series. These two trunk previously mentioned were not included in the 1989 Master Plan. Alan,note that the tributary area numbers shown on Exhibits 2 and 3,which designate inflow locations,correspond to manhole numbers shown on Exhibits 4 and 5. See the Hydraulic Computer r Model Output in Appendix B for inflow results. r 6 ilk r Design Analysis r Peaking Factor Flow generating criteria developed in the 1989 Master Plan was used to establish the average to peak flow r relationship for design purposes. Note that no flow monitoring was conducted for this study and no flow metering data was available from the District from which to compare average to peak flows. The peak to average flow equation contained in the 1989 CSDOC Master Plan Report is as follows: r QPeak= 1.94 x QAve'92, Q in mgd r Design Flow Considerations The 1989 Master Plan computer model files were utilized to optimize flow routing at various locations and to r allocate flows at existing and proposed diversion structures. Exhibits 4 and 5 are the computer model schematics of the Miller-Holder Trunk and Beach Relief and Imperial Relief Interceptors for the existing pipelines within the limits of this project area. They were modeled as part of the Miller-Holder Trunk and Knott Interceptor systems in the 1989 Master Plan,with the output included in the Hydraulic Model Schematic notebook of the master plan. The node numbering system of the 1989 Master Plan computer model is carried forward on Exhibits 4 and 5. Appendix B contains the computer model output reflecting the existing trunk system with the above described land use modifications within the project service area. Diversions were determined to optimize the peak capacity of the existing pipe and to determine the size of a r parallel relief pipeline. The following table summarizes the various flow diversions that are used to optimize pipe capacity showing the average flow diverted from the existing parallel sewer to the new Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer: r r r V r r r 7 ENZIVLE r Design Analysis r DIVERSIONS BETWEEN THE MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, IMPERIAL RELIEF INTERCEPTOR AND BEACH RELIEF TRUNK SEWER r FLOW AVERAGE r LOCATION MODEL NODE (MOD) „r From Imperial Relief Interceptor 1200' East of Palm St.(1)(2) 250 to 336 .50 r Harbor Blvd. 246 to 328 3.14 425' West of Euclid St. 240 to 314 .84 r From Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 120' South of Imperial Hwy. 226 to 720 11.90 r From Beach Relief Interceptor 1290'North of Rosecrans Ave. 414 to 218 6.43 From Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 570'South of Los Coyotes Dr.(1) 213 to 409 6.44 m From Beach Relief Interceptor r Int.of Beach Blvd.and Stage Rd.(1) 403 to 214 6.44 r From Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Int. of Tulare St.and Kingman Ave. 210 to 398 11.82 r (1) New location for flow diversion. r (2) Diversion should be activated when flows approach the projected ultimate flows. 8 B052E r Design Analysis Design Flows and Pipe Sizing The District currently maintains two sewers that operate together to handle the existing flow within the proposed project limits of this report(the Miller-Holder and Beach Relief Trunk Sewers,and the Imperial Relief and Miller-Holder Trunk Sewers). ,r Two pipe sizing scenarios were analyzed,one considering construction of a new single pipeline with capacity to carry the total flow and a second calling for replacement of one of the existing parallel sewers with capacity when operating in combination with the other existing parallel sewer to carry the project flows. Development of ,r the pipe sizes for the single pipeline concept are shown in Exhibit 8 in Appendix C and in Exhibit 6 for the double parallel pipeline concept. The estimated construction cost for the single pipeline system is$10,396,000 and for the two parallel pipe system is$8,771,000,a difference of$1,625,000. This difference is reduced by the r, reduction in cost of operating and maintaining one trunk sewer versus two trunk sewers. The Districts' staff estimates the difference in the annual O&M cost to be$10,000. This equates to a present worth of$237,000 for a 75-year facility life using a 4 percent discount rate. The net difference in the construction plus 0& M cost between these two alternatives is$1,388,000. In view of the age of the existing sewers that would remain in service and cost differential the concept of continuing with two parallel trunk sewers appears most cost effective. Imperial Highway The recommended design diameters for the entire project are based on optimizing the capacity of one of the existing trunks and replacing the other parallel trunk. From Beach Boulevard to Harbor Boulevard along Imperial Highway use of the Imperial Relief Interceptor was maximized and the replacement size of the older Miller-Holder Trunk was determined. Recommended pipe diameters,slopes and capacities are shown in Exhibit r 6. Note on Exhibit 6,the large flow difference between the design peak flows and capacity of the 21-inch proposed sewer(Station 107+22 to Station 92+77)is a result of the design criteria relative to the maximum flow depth. As shown under the Design Criteria paragraph in the Design Analysis Section of this report,trunk sewers 18-inches in diameter and less are allowed a maximum flow depth to diameter(D/d)ratio of 0.50 while trunk sewers larger than 18-inches are allowed a maximum D/d ratio of 0.75. Since an 18-inch size with an allowable D/d ratio of 0.50 did not provide sufficient capacity for the reach just mentioned,a 21-inch sewer,which is the next size available with an allowable D/d ratio of 0.75 is required and accounts for the excess capacity shown on r Exhibit 6. .� Beach Boulevard Replacement The recommendation along Beach Boulevard between Imperial Highway and Rosecmns Avenue is to utilize the r capacity of the Miller-Holder Trunk and abandon the old Line E(La Habra Purchase)and replace it with a 30-to 33-inch trunk(see Exhibit 6 for sizes and slopes). a f r r Design Analysis r r From Rosecrans Avenue to Tulare Street along Beach Boulevard we are recommending a combination of replacement of the older Miller-Holder Trunk with a 30 and 33-inch trunk and portions of the Beach Relief Interceptor in that section where the Miller-Holder Trunk is much deeper than the Beach Relief Interceptor in order to maintain service to the existing local sewer systems. r Artesia/Rostrata to Kingman/Tulare Alternatives Alternative alignments were reviewed from the intersection of Rostrata Avenue and Artesia Boulevard to the intersection of Kingman Avenue and Tulare Street. The three alignment alternatives that were developed are °V discussed in a memo dated 5-11-94, included in Appendix A and in the Design Analysis section of this report. The District has chosen Alternative 1, following Artesia Boulevard and Kingman Avenue,replacing the existing Beach Boulevard Relief Interceptor in this reach. r r r r r r r r r (JO/1HHOdE(OJ 9Ll/fl33Ll/JIll3 37rSOH� �.7 I.i I •.1 "�. NOT TO SCALE LEGEND DISTRICT BOUNDARY RAILROAD TRACKS FLOW CONTROL / DRAINAGE CHANNEL ESTATE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL • . MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 1 - MEDIUM - HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ' HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL - COMMERCIAL / OFFICE - INDUSTRIAi - HIGH INTENSITY INDUSTRIAL / COMMERCIAL INSTITUTIONAL 1 OPEN SPACE a\ 2 a i • I � 6 J/ / I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY 1989 LAND USE PLAN Exhibit 2 uoursrbroabo�nun��uiaus aysos ` £ IISIHX3 33S r�? ._ NVId ONTO dS f SIIIH YHStlH tll ®: F - F, — o©® - All N V - L E S C 0 U N T Y o� J4 j ® ® : ® o SCALE: 1'=1500' LEGEND SEWER SERVICE AREA k � BOLMARY OTRIBUTARY AREA SM LAND USE PLAN FORRco�ORCODNGG = ;l EXHIBIT 3 �,. 4 4 a SEWER SERVICE AREA WITH UPDATED LAND USE PLAN 4'.. .q /I m y i t/3UV 301A83S H3M3S t V 1181HX3 a - OOd A8VQl)013 V38V 30IAH3S F13AkM ON3031 .00SI=.l :31YOS f 71 a , 0 COIL Ol£ ® ® hZb +' Imperial Retlef N a +; 0 H +' N N P9 w a o 3 a U e d 6.697 N 5 3 W y i 4.230 M 7.620 a 0.00560 0.230 1.170 B40 230 m 83I lac naam 23B BIp . � -11,900 .015 228 300 302 304 M 3U8 31c 312 5. 3l1 315 5 —" 0,140 0.409 0.1 ezb 003 0.103 4,909p0 -.840 � 0,00360 0.00320 0 18-0.0130 is- l30 w i EAST IMPERIAL HWY >" _ a Mitler-Holder 20VLO EROd7EERina COAPORgT/On lterceptor a > -1 P7 0 4; L a N EAST IMPERIAL HWY sa c r New �— _ M a Diversion 1'9� 0.150 0.230 0.220 0.230 0.600 0A0823 1.990 —3.140 M-0013e a 330 332 334 33s X n ! '� 4 _'/ e46 5.092 CAB 0.00800 0.310 0.01040 3 6 "' �.140 1F0O' 3A60 3A60 43 15-mm 0.040 u-amaa 0.110 3.140 0.00788 -0 0.00544 W N CO Is-Dam a0 to-0" N N N L a, d > OC CL 5 A U Trunk Sewer LEGEND LOAD VEAK GLOV L A L VL e SLOPE xnNR IL,LIX- Nu(1LR- L91LlIY1 C NOTE: ° 1. This model schematic illustrates the existing pipe sizes and slopes with the updated flow. 2. Flow in MGD. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY HYDRAULIC MODEL SCHEMATIC MILLER—HOLDER AND IMPERIAL TRUNK Exhibit 5 ,10 0 _ 702 Line F. La Habra Purchase Section �v -6.265 220 Diversion 414 6.430 'PoS z1e � Ch V Q'S 4, 217 �Q 0.154 215 _ 410 New 6.440 -6.401 Diversion 409 213 p4�Y 0'4), rygoAAo O iK 211 0.226 ^' Beach Relief Interceptor ga zw 0.055CQ7�Ph 4Pq, 07 O o�?4 - St New °A Q90 Diversion 4a 216 0.051 RQ -6.440 11.820 402 ao3 214 6.440 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Diversion Tulare St. 210 212 0.367 QyQ o� _ 399 0,086 � zae 1298 _ 0.016 1,2gg 0.543 ��F�rpaGnklin St. 2os z06 17,695 N m N o P P g 0.00133 N _ CS oy 39p as4 �3.541 Artesia Blvd 2,116 — 2.116 1.092 N 0.00340 290 d � 19-a01aa dN c i d +' E O1 @ O C a.' y - BOVL6 EldGirmpim IO CORPORRT7O/) 7.6E0 zx zax -11.90 zze New 11.900 Imperlal Blvd Diversion zzs 1 o°zs� Line E, La Habra Purchase Section $ � ,Z,, 0.160 orys,�' .e40 0.054 q ne >rb Q b� aye a� ° ]01 1 �yya2°off o° ° C Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer ce zzz LEGEND Sono rc r` rwrnnc d' s�occ �x uxcr.- ewers- rve.nr ey NOTE: 1. This model schematic Illustrates the existing pipe sizes and slopes with the updated flow. 2. Flow in MGD. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY HYDRAULIC MODEL SCHEMATIC - MILLER-HOLDER AND BEACH RELIEF TRUNKS Exhibit 6 EXHIBIT 7 PROJECT DESIGN FLOWS AND REPLACEMENT SEWER SIZES PROPOSED REPLACEMENT SEWER AND MANHOLES EXISTING PARALLEL TOTAL SUB DIA. Q DESIGN Qpeek Qpeek Qpeek Qpeek EXCESS AREA STATION STREET LENGTH SLOPE SIZE CAPACITY Qpeek FLOW CAPACITY FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY NODE LOCATION (FT) (FT/FT) (IN) (MGD) (MGD) (MOD) (MGD) (MGD) (MOD) (MGD) 328 107+22 IMPERIA V HARBOR 127 0.O1350 21 10.84 493 0.00 345 4.93 14.29 9.36 326 105+93 355 0.01050 21 9.56 509 3.35 5.69 9.44 13.24 6.80 102+40 578 0.01030 21 9.47 5.09 3.35 3.09 844 12.55 4.11 322 %+62 IMPERIALIRXR 395 0.01030 21 9.47 5.15 3.35 3.08 8.50 12.55 405 318 92+77 IMPERIAWILLAGE 530 0.00900 21 835 5.61 735 3.08 9.96 11.43 2.47 97+47 323 0+00900 21 835 5.61 335 3.08 8.96 11.43 247 92+24 675 0.006W 21 723 5.61 3.35 3.08 8.96 10.31 1.35 316 75+49 IMPERIAUCYPRESS 324 0.00550 21 6.92 5.93 3.35 308 9.20 10.00 080 72+25 476 0.00550 21 6.92 5.85 3.35 3.08 9.20 10.W 0.80 315 67+49 IMPERIAUEUCLID 500 O.W540 21 6.86 5.95 335 3.09 9.20 9.94 O.74 314 62+49 424 0.00540 21 6.86 6.87 4.63 6.30 11.50 13.16 1.66 312 58+25 590 0.00540 21 6.86 6.87 6.36 6.30 13.23 13.16 4V 310 52+35 423 0.00640 21 7.47 7.46 6.36 630 13.82 13.77 405 306 48+12 IMPERIAL/WALNUT 537 0.01530 21 11.54 7.67 6.70 6.W 14.37 18.53 4.16 [ t e e t t t t [ e e t [ t e t t t [ EXHIBIT 7 PROJECT DESIGN FLOWS AND REPLACEMENT SEWER SIZES PROPOSED REPLACEMENT SEWER AND MANHOLES EXISTING PARALLEL TOTAL SUB DIA. Q DESIGN Qpeek Qpe4 Qpe4k Qpc& EXCESS AREA STATION STREET LENGTH SLOPE SIZE CAPACITY Qpeek FLOW CAPACITY FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY NODE LOCATION (R) (FT/FT) UN) (MGD) (MOD) (MGD) (MGD) (MOD) (MOD) (MOD) 42+75 500 0.00330 24 7.65 7.67 6.70 6.99 14.37 14.64 0.27 37+75 322 0110330 24 7.65 7.67 630 6.99 14.37 14.64 0.27 34+53 276 0.00330 24 7.65 7.67 6.70 6.99 14.37 14.64 0.27 304 31+77 600 O.OW30 24 7.65 7.67 6.70 6.99 14.37 1464 0.27 25+77 600 OAN80 24 9.23 7.67 670 6.99 14.37 16.22 1.85 19+77 298 0.00480 24 9.23 7.67 6.70 6.99 14.37 16.22 1.95 302 16+79 301 0.00490 24 9.23 7.67 6.70 1144 14.37 20.67 6.30 13+78 511 0.ON80 24 913 7.67 6.70 8.37 14.37 17.60 3.23 3W 08+67 IMPERIAUPRIVATE 593 0.00480 24 9.23 7.91 6.70 8.50 14.51 17.73 3.22 02+74 119 0.003M 39 26.64 7.81 6.70 9.50 14.51 35.14 20.63 228 01+55 114 0.00300 39 26.64 23.89 14.50 23.99 39.39 50.53 12.14 OO+41 IMPERIAUBEACH STATION EQUATION 160+40 IMPERIAUBEACH IN 0.00300 39 2664 23.99 0.00 0.00 23.99 26.64 275 226/720 159+36 EXHIBIT 7 PROJECT DESIGN FLOWS AND REPLACEMENT SEWER SIZES PROPOSED REPLACEMENT SEWER AND MANHOLES EXISTING PARALLEL TOTAL SUB DI& Q DESIGN QKA Qpeak QpeA Qpeak EXCESS AREA STATION STREET LENGTH SLOPE SIZE CAPACITY Qpwk FLOW CAPACITY FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY NODE LOCATION (FT) (FT/1"D (IN) (MGD) (MOD) (MGD) (MOD) (MGD) (MOD) (MGD) 554 O.W620 33 24.53 17.34 7.97 9.43 25.31 31% T65 153+82 475 0D0340 33 19.16 1734 797 843 25.31 26.59 1.28 149+07 309 0.0034D 33 19.16 17.34 7.97 9A3 2531 26.59 1.28 145+99 155 O.W340 33 18.16 17.34 7.97 8.43 25.31 26.59 L28 194+44 128 0.00340 33 18.16 1734 7,97 9.43 25.31 26.59 1.28 143+16 REACHICHEVRON 91 0.0052D 33 22.46 17.34 7,97 843 25.31 3089 5.58 142+25 575 0.W580 33 23.72 17.34 7.97 9.43 25.31 32.15 6.84 136+50 533 0.W580 33 23.72 17.34 7.97 8.43 2531 32.15 6.64 131+17 677 000340 33 19-16 17.67 7.97 843 25.64 26.59 0.95 716 124NO M6 0.W340 33 18.16 17.67 8.05 8.16 25.72 2632 O6D 117+94 BEACHIHILLSBOROUGII 5W O.W340 33 18.16 17.67 9.05 8.16 25.72 26.32 0.60 712 112+W SW O00340 33 18.16 1767 8.05 8.16 25.72 26.32 060 710 107+90 5W 0 W340 33 18.16 17.67 9.05 8.16 25.72 26.32 0.60 708 102+90 6W O.0340 33 18.16 17.67 8.05 9.16 25.72 26.32 0.60 704 96+W 8 O.W340 33 18.16 17.67 8.05 9.16 25.72 26.32 0.60 1 l [ H ( t d 1 l [ l 1 ! l l [ 1 [ [ EXHIBIT 7 PROJECT DESIGN FLOWS AND REPLACEMENT SEWER SIZES PROPOSED REPLACEMENT SEWER AND MANHOLES EXISTING PARALLEL TOTAL SUB DIA. Q DESIGN Qpcek QPcA QKu Qpcek EXCESS AREA STATION STREET LENGTH SLOPE SIZE CAPACITY Qpuk FLOW CAPACITY FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY NODE LOCATION (FT) (FT/FT) (IN) (MOD) (MOD) (MOD) (MGD) (MGD) (MOD) (MOD) 96+82 332 0.00450 33 2099. 1767 8.05 8.16 25.72 29.05 3.33 93+50 516 0.00450 33 20.89 17.67 9.05 8.16 2572 29.05 3.33 702 88+34 600 0.01566 33 38.98 17.67 8.05 6.26 25.72 45.24 19.52 700 92+34 601 0.01566 33 38.99 17A7 8.05 9.24 25.72 48.22 22.50 2191414 76+33 292 0.01370 30 28.29 W94 9.06 11+24 26.00 39.52 13.52 217 71+51 500 0+01370 30 28.29 1694 9.06 876 26.00 3704 11.04 68+51 323 0.01370 30 29.29 16.94 9.06 8.76 2600 37.04 11.04 215 65+28 BEACH/ROSECRANS 377 0.01800 30 3241 17.14 9.06 9+70 26.20 42.11 15.91 59+51 644 0.0D640 30 19.33 17.14 9.06 970 26.20 29.03 2.83 409213 53+07 6 0+02667 30 39.45 17.9 8.31 10.44 26.21 49.99 23.68 53+01 547 0.01240 30 26.90 17.9 8.31 1044 26.21 37.34 11.13 47+54 600 0.01240 30 26.90 17.9 9.31 10.44 26.21 37.34 11.13 41+54 600 0.01240 30 26.90 17.9 8.31 10A0 26.21 37.30 11.09 35+54 600 0.01240 30 26.90 17.9 8.31 10A4 26.21 37.34 IIA3 408 29+54 BEACHICAMERON 1 { f [ 1 ( { f t ( { ( ( [ ( { f l ff EXHIBIT 7 PROJECT DESIGN FLOWS AND REPLACEMENT SEWER SIZES PROPOSED REPLACEMENT SEWER AND MANHOLES EXISTING PARALLEL TOTAL SUB DIA. Q DESIGN Qpcak Qpcak Qpcak Qpcak EXCESS AREA STATION STREET LENGTH SLOPE SIZE CAPACITY Qpaak FLOW CAPACITY FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY NODE LOCATION (FIT (FT/FD (IN) (MOD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (MOD) (MGD) (MOD) 574 041240 30 26.90 17.9 8.64 1044 26.54 37.34 10.90 4M 23+80 480 0.00500 33 22.02 17.9 8.71 1044 26.61 32.46 5.85 19+00 600 0.00500 33 22.02 17.9 8 71 10.44 26.61 32.46 5.95 404 13+00 BEACWMALVERN 21B 0.00400 33 19,70 179 8.79 924 26.69 28.94 2.25 10+82 STATION EQUATION 63+19 BEACH/MALVERN 427 0,00400 33 19.70 17.9 8.79 9.24 26.69 28.94 2.25 58+92 523 0.00340 33 LIJ6 17.9 679 9.24 26.69 27.40 0.71 403Q14 53+69 BEACWSTAGE 557 0.00580 33 23.72 17.64 9.06 874 26.70 32.46 5.76 48+12 DODDSISTAGE 329 0.00580 33 23.72 17.64 9.06 8.74 26.70 32.46 5.76 44+83 DODDS/RXR 237 0.01260 33 34.% 17.64 206 8.74 26.70 43.70 17.00 212 42+46 TUI.ARE/N(R 324 0.01260 33 34.% ISA3 9.06 8.74 27.19 43.70 16.51 39+22 KRJGMAN/RILARE 12 OD1260 33 34.96 24.98 9.06 8.74 34.04 43.70 9.66 210/398 39+10 KINGMAN/HILARE 560 0.00370 39 29.58 24.98 1.37 8.94 26.35 38.52 12.17 33+50 404 0.00370 39 29.58 24.98 1.37 9.94 263S 38.52 12.17 EXHIBIT 7 PROJECT DESIGN FLOWS AND REPLACEMENT SEWER SIZES PROPOSED REPLACEMENT SEWER AND MANHOLES EXISTING PARALLEL TOTAL Still DIA, Q DESIGN Qpeek Qpeak Qpea Qpeak EXCESS AREA STATION STREET LENGTH SLOPE SIZE CAPACITY Qpeak FLOW CAPACITY FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY NODE LOCATION (FT) (FT/FT) (IN) (MOD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (MOD) (MGD) (MOD) 29+46 172 0.00640 39 38.W 24.98 126 8.94 27.24 47.84 20.60 27+74 KINGMAN/CREEK 547 O0W80 39 25.73 24.99 126 894 27.24 34.67 7A3 22+27 500 0.00290 39 25.73 24.98 2.26 8.94 27,24 34.67 7.43 17+27 492 000280 39 25.73 24.98 2.26 8.94 27.24 34.67 7.43 394 12+35 ARTESIAIKINGMAN 625 0+00290 39 25.73 24.99 228 894 2726 34.67 7.41 06+10 ARTESIA/WESTERN 392 0,00290 39 23.73 24.98 2.28 8.94 2726 34.67 7.41 02+19 19 0.00280 39 25.73 2498 2.28 8.94 2716 34.67 7,41 02+00 197 0.00280 39 25.73 24.99 219 894 2716 3467 7.41 392 1 OD+03 IARTESIA/ROSTRATA Design Analysis - ! ! - ! Bo�� Design Analysis r The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(CSDOC) 1989 Master Plan designated approximately 5.3 miles of the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System as in need of parallel or replacement sewers. This was comprised of approximately 6,150 linear feet of the Imperial Relief Interceptor,8,500 linear feet of the r Miller-Holder Trunk and 13,000 linear feet of the Beach Relief Trunk Sewer. Alignment The alignment of the project begins at the intersection of Rostrata Avenue and Artesia Boulevard in the City of Buena Park and follows Artesia Boulevard and Kingman Avenue,Tulare Street, Dodds Avenue and Stage Road to Beach Boulevard. It then proceeds northerly, following the route of the existing trunk sewers in Beach Boulevard to Imperial Highway where it runs east in Imperial Highway to just east of Harbor Boulevard. �tl The existing trunk sewers along Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway follow the low point or valley of the tributary area. The local sewer systems have been developed over the years to drain towards these two streets without the need of pump stations. The higher topography to the east of Beach Boulevard precludes an alternative to the east and Coyote Creek immediately to the west of Beach Boulevard provides a natural barrier and precludes routing a gravity trunk sewer to the west of Beach Boulevard. Similarly,the significantly higher topography to the north and south of Imperial Highway precludes a gravity trunk sewer from being routed away from Imperial Highway. One area where route alternatives have been identified and analyzed is at the downstream end of the project from r Rostrata Avenue to Tulare Street. The proposed alignment concept for the entire project is to follow the alignment of one of the existing parallel r trunks,take it out of service,remove it,and construct the new trunk in the same location(the Beach Relief Trunk Sewer-Contract No.3-16,constructed in 1971 or the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer-Contract No.34B,constructed in 1959 and Contract No.34C,constructed in 1959). Within Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway the trunks are located on the west side and south side of the roads,respectively,and are ideally located from a construction `r and traffic control standpoint. Where possible the older Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer is chosen for replacement with flow being diverted to the parallel sewer during construction. This results in the District still maintaining only two trunk sewers throughout the project area on a long tens basis. The existing flows will be diverted to the parallel Miller-Holder, Beach Relief,or Imperial Relief Trunk Sewers during construction. This condition is possible since the existing flow is less than the ultimate projected flow r condition,and the parallel sewer will be allowed to operate at its maximum capacity(D/d=> 1)or under a small pressure that will not surcharge service connections during construction. This temporary condition will allow the replacement pipeline portion to be removed and the new trunk sewer to be constructed in its' place. The District .+ is confirming that this flow handling condition is possible by conducting field tests. Utility information and improvement plans have been gathered along the route of the trunk sewer. Existing and proposed utilities which may affect the location of the new sewer alignment are plotted on the plan views of the drawings for the proposed alignment. Preliminary plans depicting the recommended sewer alignment have been prepared for this report and are attached separately. r 12 DOWLE r Design Analysis r r Rostrata Avenue to Tulare Street Alternative routes have been investigated between the Rostrata Avenue/Artesia Boulevard intersection and r Tulare Street. The route of the gravity trunk sewer cannot continue in Artesia Boulevard all the way to Beach Boulevard and follow Beach Boulevard northerly because the profile of Beach Boulevard which drops significantly below the Atchison,Topeka,and Santa Fe Railroad tracks. Therefore,the sewer must run through r the neighborhoods north of Artesia Boulevard and cross the railroad track west of Beach Boulevard as do the existing trunk sewers. r The 1989 Master Plan reflects construction of a third relief sewer from the Rostrata Avenue/Artesia Boulevard intersection through this reach to Beach Boulevard connecting to the Knott Interceptor at Rostrata Avenue. The Knott Interceptor is higher than the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at this intersection by about four feet. Therefore, _ the profile of the new sewer must approximate that of the higher Beach Relief Trunk sewer through this reach. Three alternatives were identified and analyzed. One alternative investigates replacing the existing Beach Relief Trunk Sewer from Rostrata Avenue along Artesia Boulevard and Kingman Avenue to Tulare Street with a new r larger interceptor sewer at approximately the same profile as the existing trunk. Another alternative provides relief with a parallel trunk following Rostrata Avenue and Franklin Street to Kingman Avenue where the existing Beach Relief Trunk is replaced along Kingman Avenue to Tulare Street. The third alternative encompasses a r third parallel trunk sewer following Rostrata Avenue,Franklin Street and Kingman Avenue to Tulare Street. While a route following Artesia Boulevard easterly to Fullerton Avenue and then northerly in Fullerton Avenue to Tulare Street would work hydraulically, it could be seen by inspection that crossing Brea Creek would still r require a siphon whose upstream leg would cross a privately owned lot,requiring a sewer easement. Because the upstream leg would have to be located very close to a house on the lot,construction and maintenance of the sewer(siphon)would be very costly. r The memo dated 5-I I-94 included in Appendix A analyzes the three alternative in this reach in more detail and was reviewed with the District staff. The District has selected Alternative I replacing the existing Beach Relief Trunk Sewer in its current alignment along Artesia Boulevard and Kingman Avenue. It is felt that the cost of operating and maintaining two rather than three trunk sewers will rapidly offset the small additional construction cost of a larger trunk sewer in this reach. Alan an additional siphon with the associated ongoing maintenance r costs is not required,as would be the case in Franklin Street at Western Avenue. Tulare Street to Beach Boulevard at Stage Road r The new trunk sewer is proposed to take the alignment of the older Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer(Contract No.3- 413)which was constructed in 1959 in this reach. The profiles of the two parallel conk sewers in this reach are approximately the same. Therefore,the alignment of the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer was selected in this reach due to its age. r 13 SOWLE r Design Analysis Beach Boulevard,Stage Road to 1,030 Feet South of Rosecraus Avenue In this reach the profile of the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer is significantly deeper than the Beach Relief Trunk Sewer and the local sewer systems have made several connections to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer over the years. In order to maintain service the new trunk sewer must either follow the profile of the deeper trunk to replace it or follow the alignment and approximate profile of the shallower Beach Relief Trunk Sewer and .. maintain the older Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer in service. Since the manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer were just rehabilitated throughout this reach and no observation of problems with the vitrified clay pipeline itself have been made by the District staff,the alignment of the new trunk sewer in this reach is proposed to follow that r of the Beach Relief Trunk Sewer. The alignment is located on the west side of Beech Boulevard adjacent to the curb. Beach Boulevard is wide in _ this area and will allow sufficient room for construction and traffic control during construction. Beach Boulevard, 1,030 Feet South of to 1,200 Feet North of Rosecrans Avenue The profiles of the Beach Relief and Miller-Holder Trunk Sewers are approximately the same in this reach. The two trunk sewers are also located on the west side of Beach Boulevard near the curb. Consequently,due to its age,the location of the older Miller-Holder Trunk is proposed for the alignment of the new trunk sewer within this reach. ^' Beach Boulevard, 1,200 Feet North of Roseerans Avenue to Imperial Highway From 1200 feet north of Rosecrans Avenue to Hillsborough Drive the District maintains two trunk sewers,the Miller-Holder Trunk(Contract No.3-10)on the east side of the highway and Line"E"(La Habra Purchase)on the west side of the highway. Line"W"(La Habra Purchase),which wanders through private property to the west of Beach Boulevard from 1200 feet north of Rosecrans Avenue tojust north of Hillsborough Drive has been abandoned south of Hillsborough Drive. When that portion of Line"W"was abandoned the former easement was quitclaimed and a new easement abutting the west Caltrans right-of-way line for Beach Boulevard was conveyed to the Districts in anticipation of this project. North of Hillsborough Drive,Line"E"crosses to the east side of the highway paralleling the Miller-Holder Trunk and Line"W"(La Habra Purchase)remains active in the center of the street. It is proposed to continue the new trunk sewer on the west side of the highway in this reach to approximately 1,820 feet south of Imperial Highway where it will cross the highway to parallel the existing Miller-Holder Trunk on the east side to the intersection. On the west side the sewer can be located in the paved shoulder �. outside of the travel lanes enabling easy access for maintenance operations. The District currently owns an easement just outside and parallel to the Caltrans rightof--way west of Beach Blvd. While it would save the District some construction costs to deflect out of the highway and into the District's easement for 5,500 feet .r where no pavement removal would be required,we believe the new trunk would be better located within the existing Caltrans right-of-way in the paved shoulder. The easement is located where future sidewalks,parkways or walls may be constructed when the adjacent land is developed. Also, future utilities such as,telephone, 14 r Design Ana"is electrical,gas,and cable television are usually located in this area. These improvements behind the curb make access for maintenance operations difficult and could make future construction for repairs or connections difficult and costly. Trees are often planted in this area and could subject the sewer to damage from their roots. By locating the sewer in the existing paved shoulder,access to the sewer for maintenance and other operations is assured in the future. Ultimately when Beach Boulevard is widened this location will place the sewer in the third traffic lane,which is also a preferred location for maintenance access. r Just south of Imperial Highway it is proposed to cross the highway to the east side and follow the alignment of the older Line"E",paralleling the newer Miller-Holder Trunk in the traffic lane next to the shoulder and then ,r jogging to the right tutu lane at the intersection. At the intersection the new sewer would follow the easterly and southerly curb and would be sized to carry all the flow around the comer,enabling the abandonment of the existing 19-and 30-inch sewers that are located in easements through the gas station on the southeast comer. r Imperial Highway Both the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer(Contract No.3-4C,constructed in 1959)and the Imperial Relief Interceptor(Contract No.3-19,constructed in 1974)are located on the south side of the highway adjacent to the curb. The majority of the development which fronts on Imperial Highway between Beach Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard is commercial and industrial on the north side of the road. La Habra Fashion Square stretches between Beach Boulevard and Idaho Street. Local commercial and industrial establishments continue to Harbor Boulevard with major industrial developments particularly, in the vicinity of Harbor Boulevard. r On the south side of Imperial Highway local shopping centers on each side of Idaho Street and at Harbor Boulevard are the only commercial developments within the project area. A shopping center on the southeast corner at the Idaho Street intersection is currently under construction. The remaining majority of the south side of Imperial Highway is bound by the fenced school property and the Imperial Flood Control Channel. One of two entrances to the Chevron Research Center is the only access from the south side of Imperial Highway between Beach Boulevard and the shopping center just west of Idaho Street. r It is proposed to locate the new trunk sewer in Imperial Highway to follow the alignment of the existing older Miller Holder Trunk Sewer adjacent to the south curb. This will allow sufficient room within the Imperial .. Highway right-of-way to construct the pipeline while providing traffic control during construction. By replacing the Miller-Holder Trunk with a pipe sized to provide the needed capacity,the District will only need to operate and maintain two trunk sewers throughout this reach. Traffic Control During Construction r The alignment of the proposed pipeline follows streets with variable lane configurations,speed limits and traffic patterns. A brief description of each of these streets within the project limits is given below. r The work on each of the streets within the project limits will be performed during non-peak traffic hours. The pipe trench will be backfilled or plated during peak traffic hours and the traffic will be returned to its normal pattern when required by the Agency having jurisdiction over the streets within the construction area. At some r 15 r r Design Analysis r locations it may be possible to maintain lane closures during peak hour traffic periods. If existing traffic volumes and capacity restrictions permit,the work areas in the lane adjacent to the curb will be closed for the duration of the construction period in these specific areas. It will be the contractor's responsibility to provide access to all driveways through the work zone at these locations unless an alternative access point to the property exists. r All traffic control measures shall be in conformance with the Caltrans"Manual of Traffic Controls for Construction and Maintenance Work Forces"and the Caltrans Standard Specifications and Plans. r Artesia Avenue Artesia Avenue from Rostrata Avenue to Kingman Avenue has a posted speed limit of 35 MPH and is striped for r two lanes of through traffic in each direction. Between Rostrata Avenue and a point approximately 100' east of Western Avenue,the lane configuration also includes a painted two-way turn median with designated left turn lanes at each of the intersections. Parking is prohibited for the full length of this segment. The Rostrata and r Western intersections are signalized. The pipeline trench and the adjacent work zone will require a one-lane each way operation on the southerly side r of the street. South bound traffic on Rostrata Avenue, Bumham Avenue,and Western Avenue may be prohibited access to Artesia Boulevard during work in the intersection areas. Traffic from these streets can be detoured to adjacent streets via Franklin Street. Kingman Avenue Kingman Avenue from Artesia Avenue to Tulare Street is a local 36'wide street with two-way traffic and with parking permitted on both sides of the street. Between Franklin Street and Pacific Avenue, Kingman is intercepted by the Brea Creek Channel which creates a cul-de-sac on Kingman north of Franklin and south of r Pacific. It is anticipated that parking along Kingman Avenue will be prohibited and local traffic will be limited to a one- way,one north bound lane during construction. South bound traffic will be directed to Western Avenue. In the cul-de-sac areas a flag control operation will be necessary to provide assistance to the residents during access and egress from the cul-de-sacs. During construction within intersection areas on Franklin Street, Pacific Avenue, and Tulare Street, traffic on these intersecting streets will be detoured to parallel streets via Western Avenue and Fullerton Avenue. r Tulare Street Tulare Street from Kingman Avenue to Dodds Avenue is a 36'wide local street with two-way traffic and parking permitted on both sides of the street. Parking along Tulare Street will be prohibited and traffic will be limited to `tl a one-way, one east bound lane during construction. West bound traffic will be detoured to Pacific Avenue. r 16 ENWLE r r r Design Analysis r Dodds Avenue Dodds Avenue from the Santa Fe Railroad to Stage Road is a 40'wide cul-de-sac with parking permitted on both �r sides of the street for most of its length. The alignment of the pipeline along the centerline of the street will require a flag control operation for access to and egress from this street during construction. Parking will need to be prohibited. r Stage Road Stage Road from Dodds Avenue to Beach Boulevard is a two lanes each way street with left turn lanes at Dodds Avenue and at Beach Boulevard. Parking is prohibited along this segment of the roadway. ., The pipeline crossing from the area east of Dodds Avenue to the area west of Beach Boulevard will be accomplished by the staging of construction across Stage Road so as to provide one lane in each direction of travel along Stage Road. The left rum lanes shall be maintained whenever the required limits of the work zone r permit. Beach Boulevard r Beach Boulevard(State Route 39)from Stage Road to Imperial Highway has posted speed limits ranging from 35 MPH to 55 MPH and is for the most part is divided three lanes each way. Between Hillsborough Drive and r Imperial Highway,the roadway is striped for two lanes each way. Intersections are provided with left turn pockets in the raised median area and most of the major intersections are also provided with right turn lanes. Parking is prohibited for the majority of this roadway and a painted shoulder area is provided instead. Signals ,., are provided at Stage Road,La Mirada Boulevard/Malvern Avenue,Cameron Drive,Argyle Avenue, Los Coyotes Drive,Rosecrans Avenue,Hillsborough Drive,the Painter Avenue Christian High School Driveway, and at Imperial Highway. Between Stage Road and Rosecrans Avenue,the construction of the pipeline can be accomplished by closing the outermost south bound lane and maintaining two south bound lanes of traffic. From Rosecrans Avenue to a point 1500't south of Hillsborough Drive,the space required by the work zone will require the closure of two south bound lanes while the lane adjacent to the median will remain open to traffic. At least two southbound lanes on Beach Boulevard will be maintained during the a.m.and p.m. peak hours. A south of existing traffic volume records maintained by Celtrans has revealed that there are no current data available for the segment of Beach Boulevard between La Mirada Boulevard and Imperial Highway. Traffic counts will therefore need to be collected along this segment of the roadway to determine if the third southbound .+ traffic lane can remain closed during the peak hour traffic periods. If this scenario is possible,then the length of the total construction period can be shortened by allowing certain construction activities to take place during peak hour traffic periods. r From 1500't south of Hillsborough Drive to 200'south of the High School Driveway,two south bound lanes can remain open to traffic during construction in the southbound right turn lane or in the area to the west of the existing pavement. 17 EUDVL.E r r r Design Analysis r The north bound traffic will remain in its normal pattern for all of the above described segments. During work near intersections,the south bound right tam lanes will be closed. At the intersections of La Mirada Boulevard, Resection;Avenue,and Hillsborough Drive,one lane of through traffic shall be maintained for each direction of traffic on these cross streets. From a point 1800t south of Imperial Highway to Imperial Highway,the pipeline will be constructed along the r east side of Beach Boulevard. Traffic will be maintained along the lane adjacent to the median in this two lane northbound segment of the roadway. At the intersection of Imperial Highway the construction will be performed in the right tam lane while traffic will be maintained in the two northbound lanes and the left turn lane. r Side street signal phasing will need to be placed into a fixed time mode during the staging of pipeline construction through the intersection at signalized locations. Streets such as Durango Drive and Glengarry Green can be closed during intersection construction and traffic will be diverted to the nearest intersection for r neighborhood access and egress. Minor side street traffic access to adjacent neighborhoods may be prohibited only during actual construction r activity within the intersection area and only if alternate access to the neighborhood is possible via streets not affected by construction. Only one intersection will be closed at any one time. r Imperial Highway Imperial Highway(State Route 90)from Beach Boulevard to Harbor Boulevard has a posted street limit of 45 MPH and is striped for three lanes in each direction. Between Beach Boulevard and Idaho Street,the west bound direction is striped for only two lanes. A raised median is provided for most of the roadway while the remaining portion has a painted median. Left tam pockets and/or two-way turn lanes are provided in the median area. Some of the intersections are provided with right tam lanes. Parking is prohibited for the full length of this street. Signals are located at Beach Boulevard,Idaho Street,Euclid Street,Cypress Street, Leslie Street/Lakeview Avenue,and Harbor Boulevard. Additional signals exist in the two La Habra Market Place shopping center (driveway),an apartment complex driveway new the S.P.R.R.rail crossing and the shopping center driveway west of Harbor Boulevard. Construction activity for installing the pipeline in the east bound curb lane will require the closure of one or two east bound lanes dependent on the location. Traffic will be maintained in one or two east bound lanes adjacent to the median. West bound traffic will remain in its normal pattern. Construction across Gilbert Street,Euclid Street,Lakeview Avenue,Village Drive,and Harbor Boulevard will be r staged so as to provide at least one lane in each direction of traffic on these cross streets. On Harbor Boulevard one left turn lane in each direction shall also be maintained. Traffic signals will be placed in a fixed time split- phase mode for the movements on these side streets. Minor side streets and driveways to properties with more r than one access point will be closed for the duration of construction activity within the intersection or driveway area. Only one driveway or side street shall be closed at any one time. .n 18 AWFWLE `e r Design Analysis Profile The profile has been established to work in conjunction with the existing trunk sewer that is to remain in service, which in most cases is the newer Beach Relief Trunk Sewer and Imperial Relief Interceptor. The downstream terminus at Rostrata Avenue will connect to the shallower Knott Interceptor,which is the concept of the CSDOC 1989 Master Plan. Several diversion manholes will be incorporated in the design to allow flows to be divided r between the two trunks to take advantage of the capacities of both pipelines throughout the project. Pipe sizes by reach are summarized in Exhibit 6. The preliminary alignment plans accompanying this report also show a preliminary profile for the new trunk sewer and shows the inverts of the two existing trunk sewers. r Design Criteria r The criteria for design of the trunk sewer improvements will be in accordance with the CSDOC 1989 Master Plan. In particular,for the 24-through 39-inch sewer sizes: Pipelines I. D/d=0.75 maximum ford 2 21" D/d=0.50 maximum ford 5 18" r 2. Velocity=2 feettsecond minimum at design flow 3. Material for Diameter=36"and 39"to be vitrified clay pipe or PVC lined reinforced concrete pipe as r alternatives. Material for Diameters<33"to be vitrified clay pipe. Manholes r 1. 600 feet maximum spacing 2. 60-inch minimum size for pipe size=24" 72-inch minimum size for pipe sin>27" 84-inch minimum size for pipe sin>36" r r r r 19 r Utilities and Permits Bo�� Utilities and Permits r r Existing utility information and improvement plans have been obtained from various agencies and companies along the routes of the proposed trunk sewer. Existing utilities and a preliminary alignment are shown on the preliminary plans(40 scale)which supplement this report. r The proposed pipeline alignments have been selected to minimize conflicts or involvement with existing utilities and maximize the capacity of the existing parallel trunks. The objective is to allow a contractor to develop an ,. efficient train of pipeline construction activities while minimizing the impacts to the overall community. Utility companies and agencies that were contacted and provided utility information within the project area are as r follows: Utility Company/Agency Abbreviation r Cable TV Comcast Cable Vision COM Century Cable Vision CENT Electric Southern California Edison SCE r Gas The Gas Company SCG Oil Chevron Oil Research CHEVRON Sewer County Sanitation District of Orange CSD County r City of Buena Park CITY OF BP City of Fullerton CITY OF FUL City of La Habra CITY OF LA r HABRA Storm Drains Environmental Management Agency OCEMA California Transportation CALTRANS Street California Transportation CALTRANS City of Buena Park CITY OF B P Telephone Pacific Bell PB General Telephone Company GTE Water City of Buena Park CITY OF BP City of Fullerton CITY OF F r City of La Habra CITY OF LA HABRA Suburban Water Company SWC •+ Metropolitan Water District of Southern MWDSC California ,r An on-site job walk will be conducted with District staff upon approval of the alignment in order to identify utilities that require potholing to verify location. r r 21 A3CPpq-ff `x Design Analysis Permits A large portion of the project is located within the Caltrans right-of-way along Imperial Highway and Beach ' Boulevard and the remaining southwest section of the project is located in local streets in the City of Buena Park. The required encroachment permits will be obtained from Caltrans,the City of Buena Park,and the Orange County Flood Control District(OCEMA)where the alignment crosses the Brea and Imperial Channels. In areas ' where the proposed trunk sewer intersects railroad right-of-ways,existing County Sanitation District of Orange County easements will be utilized. d. 22 r r an Vd V r r r r r Project Schedule r r r r r r r r r r r BOLE r Project Schedule r An implementation plan has been developed to enable the project facilities to be constructed in coordination with other agency projects and in contract limits that will maintain a competitive bidding atmosphere. Construction contracts have been established that would provide contract sizes in terms of cost that will fall within the bonding capacity of many local contractors. However,recognizing the administration responsibilities of the District,the number of contracts were,of course,kept to a minimum. Three construction contracts are proposed to implement the trunk sewer system improvements. The limits of these contracts are as follows: 1. Rostrata Avenue to 5.800 feet North of Rosecrens Avenue r, This reach is slightly greater than Contract No.3-I6 for the construction of the Beach Relief Trunk Sewer. It is 16,800 feet in length with the size consisting of 39-,33-and 30-inch diameter. 2. 5,800 feet North of Rosecrans Avenue to Imperial Hiahwav d This 4,200 foot reach is the portion of Beach Boulevard that is planned for improvement within the next year. The City of La Habra is the lead agency with Measure M funds being provided through the Orange r County Transportation Agency. The current schedule for the street improvement project calls for advertising in July 1995 with construction to start in the fall of 1995. Construction plans and specifications are being prepared to allow the District to complete construction of the reach by the ,r summer of 1995. 3. Beach Boulevard to East of Harbor Boulevard This reach is 10,800 feet in length and parallels the construction limits of Contract No. 3-19 for the Imperial Relief Interceptor. It is comprised of 24-and 21-inch pipe. The City of La Habra has indicated that this portion of Imperial Highway has been identified for"Smart Street'improvements. While d+ design of the street improvements are scheduled for the spring of 1995,funds for construction will not be available until 1998. The amount of time allotted for construction of the contracts is based on the following assumptions: • One month from award of the contract to delivery of the first pipe. • Pipe laying production rate of 80 feet per day and no weekend construction,except in special situations. �r • One month allotted for pipeline testing and cleanup. A detailed design schedule which identifies project milestones and delivery dates for submittals is provided in Exhibit 7. The schedule reflects a minimum practical duration for the design,bidding and construction phases of the three contracts and does not allow for unexpected delays or unusually long permit processing or review periods by the various jurisdictional authorities. The design period includes submittals for District review at the r 75 and 95 percent complete stages. r 24 BOVLE r EMBBIT 7 PROJECT SCHEDULE r IM6IWBIODPts ro MIfd.BN-gOLB60. DESIGN a CONSTRUCTION 71MAIN: BBMRR SmIrtI 0 Contract f. 3-38 Pro3act Mgr: Philip BtaM as, Page 1 .. . --. . ----- . . MI OS 03 05 07 09 11 OS 03 OS 07 09 11 01 03 05 07 09 Do 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0l 01 01 01 01 r W 96 94. 96 96 94 94 93 95 95 95 95 95 96 96 96 96 96 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ AMcrata to s.900• N/o B.nsraM I IIII I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I I 11 1 1 I I I I I Contract ft. 3-36.1 IIII IIIIIIII I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r ___________________ ( I I I I I I I I I I I I III I I III I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIIII II IIIIIIIIII ( IIIIII IIIII II A. De,iyn IIIII III I I I�.`c:7 I I I I I I IIIIII I I IIII I IIIII II II III II IIIII IIIII II II III II a. C.ruttneeion plats r IIIII III II IIIII III1111111111111111 C. Detailed Specification. IIIII I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIIII IIIII III II IIIII II ( IIIIIIIIII D. Plerm a spec•. submittal. IIIII III I I I I I I I IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII I r 7s9 submit :1 6 Review by Di.erme I I I I I I I I I I I I I kl IIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 950 subelctI a Review ey District I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 ♦4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Permit Appl•no to City 6 CaltraM III I III I I I I I k--`71 I I I I I I I I I I I III I I IIIIIIIIII111111111111111111111111 B. Plane 6 Sp.c-. for Board Agenda ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIIIIIIIII I r IIIII III II IIIII III II III II II II III II P. Board APpmv,t to Ad�rciea IIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I Ir I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIIIIII IIIII IIIII III II II ( IIIIII a. Advertime for Bid. I I I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I III I I IIIII III II IIIII IIIII IIIII II ( IIIIII r H. Awrtl Contract I I I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I IIIIIII I I I I II11111111111111111111111111111111 I. Construction Period IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I II I I I II"I I I I I II I I I I r IIIIIIII II IIIIIIIIII III II II II III II Contract on ft. RO ft... eo Imperial xMy. con I I I I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I crete . 3-30-a IIIIIIII ( IIIIII IIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII I ___________________ IIIII IIIII ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r IIIII IIIII III IIII II IIIII II II IIIII A. De.tgn IIIIIIII II III II III II III II II IIIII II B. ConetrucctM Place IIII I I 11�1}1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I r C. Detailed Specifications IIIIIIII II IIIII III II III II II IIIII II D. 75%M a ittal sRevieeal. IIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 95% submittal a advise by District IIII I III p l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r 959 Subn3ttal 6 advise by District I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PermiC Appl'M to City i CelcraM I I III I I I ICI III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E. Plana 6 Spec's for Board agenda I IIII I I I I It I I I I I I I I I I ( I I I I I I I I I I I I I r P. Board Apro.al to Advertise I I III III I I I� I I I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I II I II I I 111111111111111111111111111 D. Adv.rci.a for etas III IIIII 141 ( IIIIII IIIII ( IIIIII I I IIIII IIIIIIII II III II IIIII II II III II H. Aa.ra concrete I l 1 1 I I I I 1 1 l l l r l l 1 1 1 1 1 ( I I I I I I IIIIII I r 1111111111111111111111111111111111 I. construction Period IIIII I I I I I I I I kI'-" I I I I I I IIIII I I IIIII III IIIII II IIIIIIII II IIIIIIII IIIIIIII II III II IIIII III II IIIIIIIII r BEACH ssw.ro HARBOR BLVD. IIIII IIIII IIIIIIII 1 I IIIIIIIIIIII 1 1 C0x xo 1RACr W. 1-39-33.-3 IIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ______________ A. De.ien ( IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII IIIIIIII I ( IIIIIIII III II I111111111111111111 IIIII IIIII I I -h�'�e� I I I IIIIIIIIIIII I I r IIIIIIII IIIIII 1111111111111111111 B. Con.esuccion Plan. IIIIIIIIIIIII -K--.r--"---�` I IIIII I IIIIII I IIIIIIII II III II IIIIIIII II II II III II C. Detailed SpeclelMcloM IIIIIIIIIIIIII .-a'--`.--'�—,�--7- I IIIII 1 I I I I I I I I r IIIII III II IIIIII III III II II II III II D. P1.M a spx'• agbmice.la IIIIIIII I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r EXHIBIT 7 PROJECT SCHEDULE r IMPRDV53ffi4IS TO MILLER-ROMM DESIGN 6 CONSIRUCTION nupr Smm SYSTEM r Contract Mo. 3-38 Project Mgr: Philip Stony pn. 3 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ M 01 03 05 01 09 11 01 03 05 09 09 11 01 03 OS 00 09 r DD 01 01 01 01 OS 01 01 01 01 01 O1 al 01 01 01 el 01 YY 94 94 94 94 94 94 95 95 9S 96 96 95 96 96 96 94 96 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- l5% SWDsittal 4 Rwiw by District 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I b I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Is% Submittal a Review by District I I III I I I I I I I I I I I 1-4 I III IIII I I I I Permit APPYv to City a CAltrane I I I I I I I I I I I I I III I I I I I IIIIIIII II IIIII IIIII IIIII II II II II E. Plan. a aped. for Rosa A9slma I I I I I I I I I I� I I I I I I III I I II II IIII IIIIIII II IIIII r P. Rears Approval to Advertise I I I I I I I I I I I I III 1 1 1 I I Il I I I I I I I I I I IIIII III II III IIIIIII IIIII IIIIIIII D. AaPe[csss for Bide I I I I I I I I III I III I I� I I I I I I I I I I I IIIII III II III II III II IIIII II II IIIII H. Award Concrete IIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I lI I I I I I I I I I I r IIIII11111111111111111111 � � 1111111 1. Cocstroctich Period ------ IIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 'f-r,- r,--ram' r r r r r r r r r r r r ! Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Opinion of Probable Construction Cost r Actual construction costs can only be provided by a construction contractor based on construction documents. The opinion of construction cost is based on published guides for construction estimating and discussions with contractors and material suppliers. The construction cost opinion represents the engineer's judgment as a design professional,not a construction contractor or an estimator,and is supplied for the general guidance of the District. With no control over the cost of labor and material,or over competitive bidding and market conditions, the accuracy of such cost opinions as compared to contractor bids or actual cost to the District cannot be guaranteed. Construction will take place mostly within existing paved roads. Sewer depths are expected to range generally between 8 and 19 feet. Protection of existing utilities will be required during construction. No unusual construction problems are foreseen at this time. The approximate quantities and unit prices are listed below,with an opinion of probable construction cost for the .. project totaling$8.8 million. TOTAL APPROXIMATE UNIT CONSTRUCTION ITEM QUANTITY COST COST CONTRACT NO.3-38-1 Rostrata to 5,800'N/O Rosecrans. I.)39-INCH VCP SEWER 3,730 LF 5325/1,17 $1,212,000 r 2.)33-INCH VCP SEWER 7,500 LF $280/LF $2,100,000 3.)30-INCH VCP SEWER 5,255 LF $2501LF $1,314,000 4.)72-INCH MANHOLES 31 EA $8,0001EA $248,000 5.)84-MCH MANHOLES 12 EA $9,000/EA $108,000 6.)SIPHON(170') LS $110,000 $110,000 7.)33-MCH VCP SEWER IIOLF $725/LF $80,000 ,r INSIDE A JACKED STEEL CASING SUBTOTAL 55.172.000 r r 26 BOai/LE r a Opinion of Probable Construction Cost r r I� TOTAL APPROXIMATE UNIT CONSTRUCTION ITEM QUANTITY COST COST CONTRACT NO.3-38-2 r 5,800'N/O Rosecrans to Imperial Hwy. 1.)33-INCH VCP SEWER 4,055 LF $280/LF $1,135,000 2.)33-INCH VCP SEWER 130 LF $725/LF $94,000 INSIDE A JACKED STEEL CASING 3.)72-INCH MANHOLES 10 EA $8,000/EA $80,000 4.)84-INCH MANHOLE 1 EA $9,000/EA $9,000 SUBTOTAL $1.318-000 r CONTRACT NO.3-38-3 Beach to Harbor Blvd. r I.)39-INCH VCP SEWER 340 LF $325/LF $110,000 2.)24-INCH VCP SEWER 3,950 LF $200/LF $790,000 3.)21-INCH VCP SEWER 6,350 LF $170/LF $1,080,000 4.)60-INCH MANHOLES 28 EA $7,000/EA $196,000 5.)84-INCH MANHOLES 3 EA $9,000/EA $27,000 6.)24-INCH VCP SEWER 50 LF $530/LF $26,000 INSIDE A JACKED STEEL CASING 7.)21-INCH VCP SEWER IIOLF $470/LF $52,000 INSIDE A JACKED STEEL CASING SUBTOTAL $2.281.000 r TOTAL $8.771.000 r r Conclusion Bo�� Conclusions y The Project Report establishes the service area and design flows for these Improvements to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System. The latest land use planning information was obtained from the planning agencies within the service area and compared with that used in the CSDOC 1989 Master Plan. Flows were projected using the " flow generating parameters of the master plan. The computer hydraulic model of the master plan was updated to reflect these land use changes and hard copies of the output is included in Appendix B. ,. The Project Report identifies the proposed pipeline alignment within the roadway throughout the project. For the most part the route of the two existing parallel trunk sewers following Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway is the only available route due to the natural topography of the service area. The only route alternatives identified was in the reach from Rostrata Avenue to Tulare Street. Analysis of the three alternatives identified in this reach resulted in the proposal to follow the alignment of the existing Beech Relief Trunk Sewer and replace it with the required pipe sin. The proposed alignment within the street follows one or other of the existing parallel trunk sewers,replacing it with the required pipe sin and slope to carry the design flows in combination with the other existing parallel trunk sewer that is to remain in service. The District will continue to operate and maintain only two trunk sewers throughout the project area. Where possible,the alignment of the older Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer is proposed for replacement. The applicable design criteria for the pipelines and manholes presented in the CSDOC 1989 Master Plan is followed. .. Existing utilities have been identified. All roads are encumbered by various existing utilities including sewer, water,gas,storm drain,telephone,electrical,cable TV and oil lines. Protection of existing utilities will be required during construction. Locations requiring potholing will be identified following CSDOC approval of the alignment presented in this report. The project is in the cities of Buena Park and La Habra and in the Caltrans right-of-way of Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway. Permits will be required from the City of Buena Park and Calmms. Since all the work within .. the City of La Habra is within Caltrans right-of-way,a permit from the City will not be required. Two crossings of Orange County Flood Control District flood control channels,Brea Channel and Imperial Channel,will require a permit from OCEMA. A project schedule has been developed to implement the project facilities under three construction contracts. The first contract will construct a reach on Beach Boulevard just below Imperial Highway ahead of scheduled road improvements. The schedule for the two remaining contracts will place the project facilities in operation in the fall of 1996,ahead of the"Smart Street' improvements on Imperial Highway planned for 1998. The opinion of probable construction cost for the project facilities is$8.8 million. _ 29 MR76W Appendix A Alignment Alternative Memo r MEMO r TO: FILE FROM: JESUS LOPEZ e+ DATE: 5-11-94 SUBJECT: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County r Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Contract No.3-38 This summarizes the various alignments we are reviewing from the intersection of Rostrata Avenue and Artesia Blvd to the intersection of Kingman and Tulare Avenue. The three alignments(alternatives)we have developed provide relief to the deficient Beach Relief Trunk. Note that these three alternatives only �. affect the downstream section of this project and are located within the City of Buena Park. The three alternatives are each composed of approximately 3,900 lineal feet with replacement and paralleling variations and associated advantages and disadvantages. r Various alignments have been examined for this section,but the three listed below are the most feasible, each with various advantages and disadvantages to be considered. The following are brief descriptions r, of each of the alternatives and shown on Figure I are the alignment locations: Alternatives ° Alternative I is along Artesia and Kingman and requires removal and replacement of the existing Beach Relief Trunk along its present alignment. The replacement diameter is 39 inches. r ° Alternative 2 is along Rostrata, Franklin,and Kingman and requires paralleling and replacement of the Beach Relief Trunk. The paralleling section begins at Rostrata and Artestia,extends north along Rostrata to Franklin,and east along Franklin to Kingman. The replacement section is along Kingman between Franklin and Tulare. The parallel section requires a 27 inch trunk and the replacement section requires a 39 inch tmnk. r ° Alternative 3 is along Rostrata, Franklin,and Kingman and involves construction of a new 27 inch parallel relief trunk. The parallel trunk section begins at Rostrata and Artestia,extends north along Rostrata to Franklin,and east along Franklin to Kingman,and north along Kingman �+ to Tulare. To inform the District of the various benefits and drawbacks with the selection of an alternative,a cost estimate has been developed and is shown on Table 1. Table I summarizes the length, proposed diameter, pipe cost,and estimated project costs associated with each alternative. Table 2 summarizes advantages and disadvantages of each alternative. r r r ADEL / of . �^a (voo • . o I # cAxxxpA STAGE ti�/,•Y Y sl 9!•ER rC! \ 166tx J _. . � .. St. [r tiY:r\\'qy \ 1Spu ES tuff a i. r Pao:¢ fill rt.P i •OV I::AY. 'I OYr _ Ov. . . �•1�1 � ,A-1 I I 'RANK: 27� I j nn14¢� Hd�er�� I II I y. r jl I it pj If 1 dd I j ; it it yjli II o I I r O{cI J fi r \ 9 I aI I I Xlj i I ml ART ESIA : jI I I OII Li j r Pepe 3 r r r Table 1 r PROJECT COST ESTIMATE Pipe Construction Project Cost Lmglh Digmew Cost Cost w/E&A @ 20% Ah mauve (ft.) fin.) fEfO) t51 ono) Moon) 1 3,900 39 450 1,755 2,106 r 2 2,430 27 300 729 875 MU 39 450 02 m m 3,900 1,391 1,638 3 3,900 27 300 1,170 1,404 *30 1,434 E& -EnginmAng end Administmtion •mocaion ofexisting utilizes cost. r r ad r r r r r r Page 3 r r r Table 2 r ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERATIONS Alternative Advantages Disadvantages `a I This alternative involves the least Construction activity would impact Bow amount of trunk sewer maintenance along Artesia Blvd. r Does not require relocation of any This is the most costly alternative and involves existing utilities. removal of the existing Beach Relief Trunk. r 2 This alternative does not disrupt Would require the construction and maintenance of traffic along Artesia Blvd. a new siphon at the intersection of Westem and Franklin. Does not require relocation of any Maintenance of third sewer from Artesia and existing utilities. Rostrata to Kingman and Franklin is now required. r This alternative is$469,000 less than alternative I. 3 This alternative does not disrupt Would require the construction and maintenance traffic along Artesia Blvd. of a new siphon at the intersection of Western and Franklin and at the Brea Creek Channel. .. This is the least expensive alternative. Maintenance of a third sewer from Artesia and Rostrata to Kingman and Tulare is now required. r Requires relocation of an existing 2 inch gas and 4 inch water pipe. The cost to relocate 850 feet of 2 inch gas pipe and 320 feel of 4 inch water pipe is approximately$30,000. V r r r Page 4 r Appendix 6 Hydraulic Computer Model Output r The model output reflects the existing Miller-Holder and Knott Interceptor Systems with the 1994 land use modifications for the service area upstream of the Rostrata r Avenue and Artesia Boulevard intersection. r r r V r V r r Bale 9gineerinS totperetaov MIL -BO = SYS • IJST fl M 9/90 MD Input File MILBOLDS.PX 51wry of se. Ilvi t. end Factor. ................................. UNITS Length . feet Diameter • inches Fla. • MD r Blevation . feet Area • acre. Pressure • p.I r tlea0 • feet .1m MIT . M YSIS CRITERIA a/D nine a/D n;n. ___ ____ ___ ____ r .50 .0. .50 1B. .95 51. .75 5, .93 999. .13 999. PeARIW FACTORS --------------- R • 1.8e ¢o • .93 r r r Boyle Engineering Cor,orarron Sever Malyeie Land Use Codes MILLER-HOLDER SYSTEM • L.tSL UPDATED 9/90 MD 0030E EST 0016E DE .00390 MR .0059E ep0)R .0079E MR .00310 COM .00650 MIL .00840 HIIC .00310 IHST .00030 0 .01110 HHIC _ .01660 DC o0am CE. Boyle En9lneer:ng Corporation Wed. Sep la. 1996, 9:57 AM page 1 _ Seger Analyeia Sanitary load Appl icaci one MILLER-MOLDER SYS LA9T UPDATED 1111 ... MI MR Slope Dla- Capaciciee: Area Flo. POinr Avg. Total Vel- Depth Eiceea Under Capac: Up Oom rarer Peak Avg. Input Source Flo. Flov drIrY Rauo Avg Cap Repl. Rel-f Identification 336 315 .00580 12 .BB .66 3B.8 .10 .SC .1. 1.11 3.6 .5] 15 B e� 335 336 .00580 12 .88 .66 51.1 .23 .SO .93 1.50 3.9 .11 15 12 336 332 .00S80 15 1.59 .OF 68.9 .22 .So 1.05 1.86 9.3 .55 1B B 332 330 .00580 IS 1.59 .B9 Sl.l .23 .OD 1.2. 3.23 6.3 .62 1B 12 330 328 .00720 15 1.11 1... 31.3 .15 .00 1.63 2.67 6.8 .61 1B B 328 321 .0O800 15 1.B] 1.06 .0 .00 3.1. 6.5] 7.19 9.1 >l.. 2l 2l 326 329 .01060 15 2.13 1.22 36.8 .11 .00 6.60 1.35 9.3 >1.0 31 31 326 322 .00850 l5 1.92 1.09 .0 .00 .00 ..68 1.35 9.3 >1.0 31 21 322 320 .01350 l5 2.63 1.60 8.9 .06 .00 4.12 7.61 1.1 a1.0 21 Cl 320 31B .01060 IS 2.13 1.22 .0 .do .00 6.12 7.61 9.3 >1.0 21 3: 310 311 .00800 la 3.B] 1.06 102.7 .31 .00 5.03 7.05 9.9 .1.0 31 31 311 3l5 .00200 18 1.52 .86 Bl.a .11 .00 5.19 a.OB 1.1 .1.0 21 37 315 326 .01200 15 2.29 1.32 .0 .00 .00 5.19 ..0. 10.3 >l.0 21 23 316 312 .02200 15 2.29 1J2 .0 .00 -.06 6.35 6.8] 8.] a1 0 2l 21 322 310 .00320 1B 1.92 1.09 .O .00 .00 6.35 1.8] 6.0 a1.0 N 21 _ 3l0 309 .00320 1B 1.92 1.09 363.5 .61 .00 6.76 1.66 6.5 >l.0 34 26 308 306 .01200 15 2.29 l.32 A .00 .00 6.]6 7.66 9.9 >1.0 31 21 306 306 .00330 18 1.12 1,09 39.6 .16 .0. 6.90 1.11 6.7 .1_0 27 26 306 302 .00320 18 1.92 1.09 .0 .00 .00 6.90 1.67 1.] >1.S 27 26 302 300 .00860 IS 1.11 1.11 .0 .00 00 6.90 26] 9.7 >l.. 21 21 300 228 .00360 38 2.06 1.16 61.1 .10 .00 5.00 7.82 1.. .1.0 26 26 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . END OF STRIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290 206 .00360 18 1.90 1.12 926.8 2.12 .00 2.12 1.50 3.1 .W 21 1B ART88IA i DALE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EUD OF STRIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Boyle Engineering Corporation Wed, Sep 16, 1999, 9:57 AM Page 2 Sever Analyele Sanitary Load Applicaclene MILLER-HOLDER Sys • LAST UPDATED 4/96 MOD MN WE Slope Dia- Capacities: Area Flow Point Avg. .Deal Vei- Depth Race.. Under Capac: Up Wm meter Peek Avg. Inpuc Source FI- Fla, OCiey Ratio An Cap Repl, Rel-f Identification •••WARN:NG^• ZERO OR NEGATIVE FLOW IN THIS REACH 262 210 .D0200 IS 1.52 .06 0 .00 .00 .DO .00 .0 .00 .B6 MCFADDSN 6 NEWLAND ^•WARNING••• ZERO OR NEGATIVE FLOW IN THIS REACH 260 160 .00200 10 1.52 .BO .0 .no .00 .00 .00 .0 .00 .90 NCFAOO.. 6 REACH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . END OF MIR . . . � . 266 266 .00160 21 3.76 2.36 36.2 .13 .DO .13 .28 1.5 .IT 2.11 ORANGE 6 KNOTT. 266 106 .00200 21 6.1B 2.51 133.1 .al .00 .56 1.01 2.6 .32 1.91 ORANGE 6 HOLDER We . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENO OF STRIP . . . . . . . . e . . . . . . . . . . . 296 296 .00230 26 6.11 3.93 .0 .00 5.30 1.1. 0.36 4.1 .1.0 21 2: NICHOLS 6 SLATER 296 292 .00610 26 10.61 6..3 32.6 .15 .00 5.53 0.57 6.2 .65 1.31 NI CNOLE 292 131 .00510 24 ]0.0) 6.59 .0 ..a .00 5.53 0.57 ... .61 1.06 NICHOLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . END OF STRIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •••WARNING••• ZERO OR NEGATIVE FLOW IN THIS REACH 280 279 .00300 26 1.]0 6.65 .0 .0. .00 .00 .00 .0 .00 CIE ORANGETNORPE/MAGNOLI ...WARNING••• ZERO OR NEGATIVE FLAW IN THIS REACH _ Il. 216 ...In. 21 1.23 9.60 .0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 .00 4.10 •YARNING••• ZERO OR NEGATIVE FLOW IN THIS REACH 276 276 00260 26 1.90 6.]2 .0 .on .Go .on 00 .0 ... 6.11 SACRED CROSSING ...WARRENS... ZERO OR NEGATIVE FLOW IN THIS REACH 276 272 .00S20 21 6.93 6.26 .0 00 .00 .DO .do .0 00 0.26 "•WARNINV••• ZERO OR NEGATIVE FLOW IN THIS REACH 272 270 .00300 26 1.30 CIS .0 .00 .on 00 .00 .0 .00 4.65 ORANGEMO0.P E/5 FYy •••WARNING••• ZERO OR NEGATIVE FLOW IN THIS ERROR 21. 26B 00200 27 0.16 5.25 .n 00 .OD 00 00 .0 .00 5.25 WESTERN/OAANGEINORPE 210 200 00160 ]0 9.61 6.]l 065.5 3.35 .00 ].]5 S.40 3.6 .51 2.96 0'!ll 6 YESI£RN We' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENO OF EMIR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Boyle Engineering Comorat ion Bed. Sep la, 1994, 9:57 AM Page 1 Sever Malycie Sanitary Load Application MILLER-MOLDER EYS EB - LAST UPDATED 4/90 WD Mal MA Slope Ola- Capacitie6: Area Flaw Point Avg. total Vel- Depth Excess Under Cape- Up Down meter Peak Avg. Input Source Flow Flaw a iry Ratio AVg Cep Real. Rel'[ Identi Hcation 250 268 .00508 IS 2.50 1.85 1132.6 3.51 -.50 1.06 8.99 5.0 .el 21 18 ENO OF MUN( 2a. 266 .00100 1B J.al S.IB 50.0 .OB 00 3.S4 5.09 5.9 .l0 21 SB 246 244 .01032 1B 3.45 2.06 .D .00 -l.la .DO .00 1.1 .03 2.06 IMPERIAL 6 HARBOR Rea 244 242 .00370 21 5.68 1.54 Ise., 1.99 .00 1.99 3.35 4.1 .52 1.55 _ 242 240 .00923 IB J.OB 1.82 .D .00 .OD 1.19 3.35 5.5 .53 21 B 240 239 .00455 21 1.30 3.96 .0 .00 .81 2.03 4.63 a.B .60 1.11 239 231 .00455 21 6.30 1.11 351.4 1.17 .00 8.00 6.36 5.0 .11 24 6 237 230 .00455 21 6.30 3.96 .0 AO .00 8.00 6.36 5.0 A6 21 6 230 236 .00560 21 6.19 4.43 13.1 .23 .00 4.23 6.70 B.6 .12 .20 236 234 .01500 21 11.44 151 .0 .00 .no e.23 1.10 8.2 .52 3.34 234 232 .00398 la RAI 5.39 .0 .00 .00 4.23 1.10 4.9 .64 1.16 war 232 230 .00406 24 8.50 S.aB .0 .00 .00 4.23 1.10 5.0 .63 1.25 amp 230 229 .00600 21 14.14 9.53 2850.2 7.62 .OD 11.85 11.2E 6.1 a1.0 30 21 BEACH L IMPERIAL 30D 226 5.00 .Do V 229 226 .00360 30 14.50 9.80 .0 .Do .DO 16.86 23.09 1.5 a1.0 19 21 BRACN 6 IMPERIAL 226 225 .01560 10 4.24 2.51 .0 .00 -I1.10 4.95 I'll 6.4 'IS 21 :B 225 227 .00400 24 6.43 5.43 .0 .00 .00 a.95 1.14 5.1 .10 .48 227 224 .00400 24 1.43 5.13 .0 .00 .Is 5.13 1.91 5.1 .12 AL 224 222 .00200 27 8.11 5.25 .0 .00 as 5.11 1.05 3.9 .76 .00 222 220 .03400 IB 1.26 3.93 .0 .00 .00 5.11 6.05 11.7 .58 21 12 220 218 .ODa BO 24 1.26 6.00 .0 .00 .00 5.11 ..an 5.5 .11 .83 Rea 2I9 217 .01330 21 10.11 1.09 .0 .00 6.43 Il.60 11.94 10.9 .1.0 21 21 BEACH/NO. OF ROSECRA 217 215 .01250 21 10.44 6.05 .0 .00 .OD 11.60 16.9a 10.1 a1.0 21 21 215 213 .01250 21 10.44 6.85 41.3 .15 .00 11.71 11.15 114 a1.0 31 21 Ree 213 211 .01250 21 10.44 6.85 10.0 .D4 -6.<4 5.35 8.31 0.0 .13 3.50 Boyle Engineering Corporation Wed, Sep 14, 1994, 1:11 AM F.I. 4 Sever Analysis Sanitary Load Applications MILLER-HOLDER SYSTEM • LAST UPDATED 4/94 MGO MH MH Slope Dla- CapaCitvea: Area Flow Point Avg. Total Vel- Depth Excees Under Capac: Up Dawn meter Peak Avg. Input Source Plow Flow oC1q Ratio An Cap Repl. Rel'f Identification 211 209 .01250 21 10.44 6.B5 SB.O .23 .00 5.58 8.64 8.1 .15 ].3B 7 209 216 .01250 21 10.44 6.as 14.0 .OS .00 5.63 B.Y1 a.1 .65 i.22 21l 214 .00.90 24 1.24 6.00 55.9 .05 .00 5.60 8.79 5.6 .72 .32 BEACH BLVO. 6 MALVER 214 212 .00460 34 1..4 5.86 .0 .00 6.44 10 12 17.64 0.1 a1.0 ll 24 BEACH BLVD aw, 212 210 .01100 21 9.79 6.39 91.2 .37 .00 12.49 18.13 11.7 11.0 29 21 TULARE 6 RR 21D 200 .01300 21 9.19 6-09 .0 .00 -11.82 .67 1.23 4.6 23 5.72 RINGMAN 6 TULARE 208 206 .D0240 37 0.14 5.79 22.0 .01 .DO .76 1.31 2.1 .25 5.04 RINGMAN a OCFCC ma 306 205 .00240 21 8.94 5.19 114.8 .54 .00 1.30 2.26 3.1 .33 4.49 FRANKLIN 6 RINGMAN 205 204 .00240 27 8.94 5.79 4.0 .02 .DO 1.31 2.28 3.1 .33 4.48 290 204 2.12 .00 U 204 202 .00240 24 6.S3 1.12 .0 .00 .00 3.43 5.52 3.9 .66 .69 ARTBSIA 6 POST. n1 302 One .O0190 30 10.54 6.l2 248.0 1.o9 .00 4.52 1.12 3.8 .57 2.40 .077 6 ARTESIA 268 200 3.35 .00 U 200 _98 .00076 42 16.35 11.16 39T.2 1.18 .00 9.55 14.17 3.2 .67 1.61 gtOTF AVENUE 198 196 .00060 45 17.46 11.98 .D .DO .OD 9.55 14.17 2.9 .64 2.44 VALLEY VIEW/CNTY LIN ]96 194 .00052 45 ]1.25 ll.09 591.9 2.15 .00 11.70 11.01 2.8 .78 40 31 194 192 .00052 45 16.25 11.09 .0 .00 .00 11.10 1Y.o9 2.B .1. 4B 21 VALLEY VIEW/91 FRNY 192 190 .00056 45 16.E7 11.54 129.1 1.22 .00 12.91 10.10 3.0 .83 4B 21 VALLEY VIEW/LA PALM 19D 188 .OD045 46 17.91 12.31 653.4 1.32 .OD 14.23 20.15 2.8 .06 51 34 VALLEY VIEW 6 CRBSBN - INS 186 .00045 40 17.96 12.31 141.1 .34 .00 14.58 20.90 2.1 .89 51 21 286 194 .00046 51 21.80 15.26 .o .00 .00 14.58 20.90 2.9 .72 .60 VALLEY VIEN 6 LINCOL 264 184 .54 .CO U 184 102 .08052 51 12.69 15.14 175.1 .66 .00 15.78 22.46 3.1 .74 .16 VALLEY VIEW 6 ORANGE 182 180 .00052 51 22.69 15.94 313.1 1.41 .00 17.10 24.32 3.1 .80 54 21 VALLEY VIEW 6 BALL 180 178 .00052 51 22.61 15.94 .0 .DO .DO I1.10 24.32 3.1 .B0 54 21 VALLEY VIEW/CERRITOS 178 171 .00052 51 22.19 15.94 452.E 1.24 R. 10.42 25.93 3.1 .86 54 21 CERRITOS 6 FLORENCE Boyle E`yineerin9 Corporation Wed, Sep 16. 1996, 1:51 AM Page 5 Sever Analysis Sanitary bad Applications MILLER-HOLDER SYSTEM • LAST UPDATED 6/96 NCO WE, MN S1OOt' Ola- Capacities Area Floe, Point Avg. Total Vel- Depth Ezceae Under Capau Up Me,n mettt Peak Avg. Input Source Floe, Floe, Ociry Ratio Avg Cap Repl. Rel-f Identification 376 174 .00051 51 22.61 15.96 367.3 1.13 .00 19.55 27.39 1.0 .1.0 Si 3c KATELLA 6 MOPE SS 176 172 .00060 51 26.3B 11.23 662.7 1.75 .00 21.30 29.63 3.2 11.0 51 30 172 110 .00060 51 26.38 17.23 .0 .00 .00 21.30 29.13 3.2 .1.0 11 l0 170 168 .00G60 51 26.3B 17,23 .0 .00 .00 21.30 29.63 3.2 a1.0 51 30 168 166 .00060 51 24.38 17.23 .0 .00 .00 21.30 21.63 3.2 '1.0 Sl 3D So"NGGALE 6 CHAR AN 111 166 .00060 51 24.39 17.23 .0 .00 .00 21.30 29.63 3.2 a1,B 52 30 164 162 .00060 51 26.38 17.23 582.2 1.01 .00 22.36 10.96 3.6 a1.0 5] 33 SPRINGDALE 6 LAPSON 112 110 .00066 60 37.91 21,BB 825.E 1.67 .00 23.81 12.B6 l.2 16 6.D9 SPRINGDALE/GRON DROP 160 158 .00044 60 37.96 27.8E .0 .00 .00 23.81 12.B6 3.2 .11 6.01 EOWARDS 6 GARDEN GR. 15B ISE .DOOM 60 37.16 27.8E .0 .00 .00 23.81 32 84 3.2 .'16 6.0] ISE 156 .GDOic 60 37.96 27.8E .0 .00 .00 23.81 32.64 3.2 .]6 6.t' EDWARDS a TRASR 156 ISE .00066 60 31.96 27.8E .0 .OD .00 23.81 32.96 3.2 .]6 4.01 ISE ISO .00069 60 11.96 2].B6 .0 .0G .00 23.81 32.86 3.2 '16 O.OI EDWARDS 6 WEStUNSf, 150 166 .00066 60 37.91 27.68 .0 .00 .00 23.81 32.86 3.2 .76 6.01 168 166 .00062 66 47.92 35.86 .0 .00 .00 23.81 32.66 3.2 .66 12.02 NA2AR0 a EDWARDS aa� 166 166 .00044 66 6B.95 36.76 1822.6 9.05 .00 27.61 37.93 3.3 .70 8.90 HAZARD 6 GOLDEN WEST IN 162 .00039 69 51.21 38.61 190.9 .16 00 28.62 3B.B9 3.2 '19 9.98 HAZARD 6 HOOVER 162 160 .00030 69 51.21 30.11 L96.5 -71 .00 29.39 39.86 3.2 .10 9.22 RR 6 BOLSA 210 160 .00 .00 U 160 238 .00036 69 51.21 38.61 125.3 .25 .00 21.66 60.16 3.2 .70 a." RR 6 MCPADDEN I3B 136 .00038 69 51.21 18.61 .0 .DO .Do 29.66 60.11 3.2 .]G B.91 RR a CENTER 131 134 .0003B 69 51.21 39,61 139.5 .65 .0G 30.09 40.]1 3.2 .11 0.52 RR 6 EDINGER 136 132 .0003E 69 51.21 38.61 220.8 .83 .00 30.91 61.76 3.2 .13 ].]0 RR 6 HEIL 132 131 .00030 69 51,21 Mal 135.i .62 .00 31.33 62.26 3.2 .13 7.26 WARNER 6 RR _ Boyle Engineering Corporation Wed. Sep 16. 1914, 9:51 AN Page 6 Seven Analyeie Sanitary Load Applicavane MILLER-HOLDER SYS • LAST UPDATED 6/94 MD MN WE Slope Oia- Capacit_ee: Area Flo, Point Avg. Total Val- Depth E%Ceee Under C."C: Up Down meter Paak Avg. Input Source Flow Flaw o ity Ratio An Cap Repl. ReYf Identification 292 131 131 130 .00038 69 51.31 36.61 125,2 56 .00 31AO 69.1E 3.2 .81 ].21 WARNER 6 NICHOLS 130 126 .0003E 69 Sl.2l 38.61 195.0 .el .00 3i Bl 50.2E 3.2 .00 .00 WARNED 6 BEACH 120 126 .00036 69 51.31 38.63 381.5 .56 .00 30.35 50.90 3.2 .91 '25 xARNER 6 .. 126 126 .0006E 72 61.13 6].30 355.0 .61 ... 31.03 St.]2 3.6 .16 8.27 MAGNOLIA 6 WARNER 126 123 .0006E 12 11.13 13J0 130.1 .25 .00 39.28 52.03 3.6 .75 8.02 MAGNOLIA 6 SLATER _ 123 122 .0006E ]2 61.73 6L30 06.0 .20 .00 39.68 52.27 3.6 .75 1.82 MAGNOLIA 6 ELPRESIO. 122 121 .0006E 12 61.73 67.30 111.. 15 .00 39.12 52.57 3.6 .75 7.50 MAGNOLIA 6 TALBERT 121 120 .0006E 72 61.73 67.30 18.3 -16 .00 39.8E 52.1E 1.6 .]5 ].a< MAGNOLIA 6 120 111 .00092 72 10.3% 66.12 262.0 .31 .00 60.23 53.19 3.5 .]8 5.89 MAGNOLIA 6 ELLIS 111 118 .00062 R 60.31 66.12 125.8 .20 .0. 60.63 53.63 3.5 18 5.69 MAGNOLIA 6 aaa 118 116 .00062 12 60.31 66.22 BB1.2 2.20 .of 62.63 56.11 3.5 .82 3.6E MAGNOLIA 6 GARFIRLO 216 116 .00062 72 60.31 66.12 .31.1 1.6E .00 66.29 58.11 3.5 .86 1.13 MAGNOLIA 6 YOEK)OWM 111 112 .00012 72 .0.31 16.i2 BI". 1.59 .00 65.8E 10.03 1.6 .91 .26 MAGNOLIA 6 BLAME 112 110 .00062 72 60.31 66.12 165.2 '23 .00 66.11 60.31 3.6 .13 .OS MAGNOLIA/INDI➢BAPOLI I10 108 .00036 ]e 19.13 53.69 111.9 .20 .00 16A0 60.15 3.6 .T 7.01 MAGNOLIA 6 ArLASTA SOB 106 .00036 ]B 19.13 53.99 113.9 .14 .to 66.53 60.81 3.6 .l] 6.95 MAGNOLIA 6 HNIILTON 106 106 .00036 78 19.13 53.99 :16.6 .65 .00 e6..1 61.3E 3.6 .18 L50 MAGNOLIA 6 BANNING 106 102 .00036 18 19.23 53A9 78.3 .13 00 67.12 63.52 3.6 .18 6.31 BANNING 6 OCFCC 102 100 .00036 18 69.13 S3.69 1163.E 2.6E .00 69.56 66.69 3.e .82 3.93 BANNING 6 IBAWAAO • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENO OF AREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r Boyle Engineering Corporation _ Land Uae Area Sunmta ry MILLER-MOLDER SYSTEM • LAST UPDATED e/9e MD EST 100.]B IJR 13106.01 MDR 161e.07 Mmn 81033 0R 482.12 ea, CCM E510.41 MIL 1093.i3 T MIIC 35.13 INS! 659.E3 O 615.02 MXIC 00 OC 00 ccoN Oo to ea� 33266.19 MANHOLE DIN4TER -- .3] Your plot file name 19 ACADaC.MF Boyle Engineering corporation NNbIT SYSM : LAST IIPDAM 3100/90 MD Input File WJ 4.PoC Suamery of SWAN Mica and Factors ................................. VNITS ee. Length • feet Di...car . inch.. Fla. • MD 63evacfon • fear r Area Pre eau ry • peS ea Head feet DESIGN CRITERIA ANALYSIS CRITERIA ... a/D die. G/D Liam . . .98 18. .PS75 51 5�. .95 Si. .13 999. .13 999. r PEAIfiNS PARORS --------------- R 1.84 RO .93 f r r r Boyle Engineering Corporation Serer Analyeiv Lem use Codes WY SZSI@1 LAST UPM= 11/20/94 MD r .00300 En, .00160 LOP, .00390 lmit .00510 !00)R .00790 xM .00330 CON .00a50 xIL .00840 x33C .00390 .. .00ox0 0 A1160 .1C .01680 DC .00650 CCM r i eoyle Engineering Corporation Tnu, Oct 20. 1994, 3:55 PM Page I Sever Analysis Sanitary Lead Applications 9N%T SYETEN LIST UPOATEO 11/39/88 MGO Mn an Slope Dia- Capacities: Area Floe Point Al. Total Del- Depth Excess Under Capac: Up Wvn meter Peak Avg. Input Source Floe F1oX acity Ratio An Cap Repl. Ral't Identification ••WARNING••• ZERO OR NEGATIVE FLAX IN THIS REACH na 472 .00540 15 1.53 .B5 .o .00 .co .0o 00 -0 00 BE LAHPSON c BEACH ...WARNING"' ZERO OR NEGATIVE FLOW IN THIS REACH 672 670 .00110 15 .19 .36 .0 .00 .at .00 .00 .0 .00 .it LAMPSON 6 OCFCC ass ...WARNING••• ZERO OR NEGATIVE FLOW IN THIS REACH 670 656 .00250 15 1.01 .56 .o I. .00 H. .00 -C .in .56 LAYPSON 6 OCFCC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . END OF STRIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 666 666 .00166 15 .95 45 609.2 ].96 .00 1.94 3.3] 4.1 >1,0 21 21 TRASH 6 BEACH 461 666 .DD393 RS 1.31 .1. .0 .c0 .00 1.1. 3.27 4.1 >1.0 31 lB TRASH c BEACH 666 653 .00 QO 15 1.35 .Ta .0 .00 .00 1.96 3.31 i.i >3.0 31 lB TILISH c BEACH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OP STRIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i86 684 .00210 21 4.76 2.92 1108.6 1.11 .00 1.11 6.03 1.9 .1.0 26 10 500' N. OF [RESENT •••XAR2NNG••• ZERO OR NEWTIVE PLNY IN THIS REACH 404 4B2 .00120 21 3.23 1.92 46.1 .10 -1.89 -.02 .04 .] .07 1.94 WESTERN 6 CRFSENT 482 480 .00120 22 3.23 1.92 272.1 1.29 .DO 1.27 2.21 2.4 5] .65 WESTERN I LINCOLN 480 376 .00260 22 3.74 2.24 .0 .so .00 1.21 2.31 3.] 52 .9] ORANGE 6 WESTERN ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENO OF STRIF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 696 694 .1.13. 21 3.]] 2.00 362.7 1.50 .00 1.so 2.58 2" .61 "1 LOS PATES 6 MARINA ass 694 692 .005.0 21 1.81 4.34 .0 .00 .00 1.50 2.58 4.4 .40 2.84 BOLSA CHICA/LOG FAIR 692 190 .00130 31 9.01 1..4 .0 ..1 .00 1.50 2.58 5.3 .35 4-14 690 689 .01180 21 10.14 1..4 .0 .do .00 I.SO 2.58 5.8 .33 5.14 BOL A CNICA 6 DUNRM 180 686 .00230 31 l.37 2.00 1006.4 3.07 .00 4.5] 1.20 4.6 >I.o 30 24 WARNER A Do. CNICA 686 684 .0072D 21 7.92 5.08 .0 .00 .00 4.57 7.20 6.2 .69 .50 WARNER 6 LESLIE 684 68I .02390 21 14.44 9.75 .0 .00 .00 4.51 1.2. 1.9 .4. 5.17 WARNER l GREENIREE 693 682 .00120 21 3.23 1.92 .0 .00 .00 4.57 7.20 4.6 11.0 3c 24 WARNER 6 CAWON 682 680 .00120 21 3.23 1". 2H2.1 .is .00 4.93 7.1. 5.0 >1.0 30 24 WARNER 6 GRAXAN 680 622 .00010 24 3.21 1.94 .0 .00 .DO 4.13 1A0 3.0 >1.0 36 27 WARNER 6 LARH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . END OF SERIF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ma Boyle Engineering Corporation Thu. Oct 20, 1996, 3:55 PM Page 2 Sewer Malyale Sanitary Load Applications .0,T ST. . VPDATED 11/29/06 MGD XX MH Slope Dia- Capacities: Are. Flow Point Avg. Total Vel- Depth Excess under Celiac: we up Down meter Peak Avg. Input Source Flw Flow oclry Ratio Avg Cap Repl. Rel't Identification 666 662 .00260 IS 1.02 .as SB].'I .36 .00 .36 .61 2A .31 .GI EPRINGOALE 6 BOLSA ang 662 110 .00110 15 .86 .46 699.5 1.00 AO 1.36 2.33 2.9 a1.0 21 21 SPRINGDRLE 6 MCFADDE 160 658 .00120 21 1.23 1.12 22B.6 .66 .00 1.10 3.05 2.6 .12 .12 SPRINGDALE 6 EDINGER am 659 656 .00020 26 1.B9 1.O7 260.8 .$1 .00 2.62 e.30 2.1 a1.0 33 1] EPRINGDN,E 6 HEIL 656 656 .00110 26 5.11 3.30 .0 .00 .00 2.62 6 J0 3.1 .66 "1 me, 656 626 .00110 26 5.33 3.30 16.7 .07 .00 2.69 6A3 3.2 65 AG • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . END OF STRIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....AILNINfi... ZERO OR NEGATIVE PLO. IN THIS REACH 662 660 .00120 21 1.23 1.92 1650.9 5.06 -5.00 -.02 06 1 ,Cv 1.9] NESIERN 6 RATELLA •..NARNING... ZERO OR NEGATIVE FLAN IN THIS REACH 660 658 .00120 21 3.23 L92 .0 .00 .02 -.02 .06 .4 .ol 1.93 WESTERN 6 ORANGE 658 456 .00120 21 3.23 1.92 as . .20 .00 .1. .31 1.5 .22 I.I. WESTERN 6 CNAPMRN 41. 656 ,Do .00 U •••WARNING"' ZERO OR NEGATIAT PWW IN THIS REACH 656 656 .00120 21 3.23 1.92 769A 2.28 -2.60 D2 .05 .8 .01 1.96 WESTERN 6 LRMPSON 656 652 .00100 26 6.22 2.51 329.8 1.62 .00 IAO 2.62 2.3 .51 1.11 WESTERN & G.G. BLVDwee 466 652 1.96 .11. U 652 650 .00110 26 4.62 2.19 .0 .00 .00 3.33 EAR 3.6 >1.0 27 19 HOOVER 6 MASS ame 650 363 .00210 26 5.33 3.30 210.E .11 .00 6.12 I.S. 3.2 >l.0 21 1B HOOVER 6 WESTMINSTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . END OF MIT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . wea •••WARNING"' ZER0 OR NEGATIVE FLOW IN THIS ReACN 631 636 .00300 26 1.30 6.65 .0 .1. or Co. .00 .0 .00 4.65 ORANGEIHORPE/BREXURE . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . END OF STRIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eme 676 176 .00220 12 .56 .21 66.1 .OB .00 .00 .27 1.5 .26 .20 GOLDENNEST 6 EDINGER 676 672 .00280 15 .B9 .67 691.3 1.56 .00 1.61 2.76 3.5 >1.0 21 21 GOLDENNEST 6 XEIL ame 172 670 .001.0 15 .89 .67 50.5 15 .Do 1.81 ).is ... a1.0 21 21 G0....' 6 WARNER 670 600 .00120 27 IA2 3.11 .0 .00 .00 1.86 3.15 2.6 AT 2.11 me . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . END OR STRIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 576 574 .00130 1B 1.22 .17 1143 1.67 .0. 1.67 2.06 2.5 a1.0 21 21 ELITER a uliw O Boyle Engineering Corporation Thu. Oct 20, 1994. 3:55 PM Page 3 Sever Analysis Sanitary Load Applications FNOTT SYSTEM : LAST UPDATED 11/29/08 MGD MN MN Slope Did- Capacrtiesi Are Flaw Point Avg. Total Val- Depth Excess Under CapeCaps,.� Up Down meter Pass A". input Source FlOw Flow Deity Ratio Avg Cap Reel. Rel-f Identification all 572 .001]0 1B 1.22 .11 169.5 AP .00 2.0E 3.46 3.0 a1.0 24 21 GEMNI 6 LA PALMA ass SR SIG .0 rll4 18 1.15 .62 .0 .do .00 2.06 3.46 3.0 a1.0 24 31 BERRI 6 CRESCENT 570 568 .00114 1B 1.15 .62 256.2 .47 .so 2.53 4.18 3.1 a1.0 24 21 DENNI 6 LINCOLN ass 560 566 .00114 21 3.15 S.BT .0 .00 .Do 2.53 4.18 2.1 >I.0 24 18 ORANGE 6 OSUMI 566 564 .00114 21 3.15 1.6] 19.1 .24 .00 2.79 4.54 2.9 a1.0 29 21 BLWMPE:LO 6 ORANGE - 564 562 .00100 24 4.22 2.5E 251.4 .61 .00 3.43 5.52 2.1 a1.0 21 21 BLOOMFEILO 6 BALL 562 560 .00092 27 5.54 3,44 98.1 .11 .so 3.62 iBl 2.1 .1. ]D 12 CERRITOS/BLOOMFEILD _ 56. 55B .Oo096 21 5.6E 3.52 293.2 .91 .so 4.53 9.14 2.8 a1 0 3D 21 CERRITOS 6 LOS AL. 558 556 .00096 30 7.49 4.18 12E.2 .59 .00 5.13 7.99 1.. .B0 33 15 NATELLA 6 OAR ass SSE 554 .000.0 30 6.84 a.33 .0 .0G .00 5.13 1.99 2.7 .90 33 21 LOS AL, 6 NATELLA 554 552 .00004 30 7.01 4.44 .0 G. .00 5.13 1.11 2.B .86 33 21 Los AL. a ORANGEWOOD 552 550 .00084 30 7.01 4.44 .0 .00 .00 5.1] 1.99 2.B .86 33 21 LOS AL. 6 ROSMWRE 550 506 .05600 24 31.55 22.80 .0 .00 .do 5.13 7.19 13.9 .]3 17.68 WESTSIDE P.S. • . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ENO OF SCRIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sas 341 339 .00300 33 17.07 11.70 .0 .Do 1.16 1.11 11.70 5.1 .51 1.14 SOLSA c MAGNOLIA ST. 339 337 .00440 33 20.68 14.40 .D .00 .00 1,1E 11.70 6.0 .51 6.64 BOLSA 6 EDEN ST. r 137 336 .00320 33 17.63 12.11 .0 .so .00 1,1E 11.70 5.3 .56 4.35 BOLSA 6 PURDY ET. . . . . . . . . ♦ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . END OF STRIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ♦ ass 652 150 .00180 ]2 .49 .25 140.5 .51 .00 .11 .11 2.2 .BO 10 12 ROISA CM:CA 6 BOLSA SIG 64. .Islas 35 .B9 .41 .0 .00 .0D .St .91 2.3 .52 10 6 BOLSA CMICA/MCFADDEN 646 646 .00140 15 .1a .41 .G ,so .so Si. .96 2.1 .57 18 1s 646 644 .00160 15 .84 A4 419.E .11 .00 1.31 2.21 2.9 a1.0 21 21 EDINGER 6 BOLSA CHIC 644 642 .00153 15 .82 .43 .0 .00 .00 1.31 2.27 2.1 a1.0 21 21 642 640 .DB142 IS .79 Al .0 .Do .00 1.31 2.27 2.1 a1.0 21 21 ass 640 636 .00247 15 1.04 .56 .0 .00 .00 1.31 2.27 2.9 .1.0 21 1B 638 636 .00170 24 5.50 3.41 825.5 3.41 .00 4.71 7.40 3.1 a1.0 27 21 EDINGER 6 GRAMAM Boyle Engineering Corporation Thu, Oct 20, 1994, 3:55 FM Page a Sever Analye is Sen l[ery Load Application. KNOTT SYSTEM LAST UPDATED 11/29/88 MOD MR MN Slope Dia- Capacities: Area Flow Point Avg. Total Vel- Depth Exceed Under Capa C: Up Down meter Peak Avg. Input Source Flaw Flow c ity Ratio Avg Cap Repl. Sel-f Identification 636 634 .00104 27 iB9 3.68 .0 .00 .00 4.11 7.40 2.9 >1.0 30 21 SPRINGDALE 6 EDINGER 634 632 .00115 2T 1.19 1... .0 .OD .00 4.71 1.10 2.9 a1.0 30 21 632 630 .00074 27 4.91 3.06 .0 .00 .00 4.7l 9.40 2.9 >l.0 33 21 SPRINODALE 6 REIL 630 628 .00149 27 7.05 4.47 .0 .DO .OD 4.71 9.40 3.4 Is 30 12 628 626 .0001E 2l 2.24 1.IF .0 .Do .OD 4A1 1.4. 3.9 a1.0 45 39 _ 654 626 2.61 .Do U 626 624 .00014 36 4.6E 2.8E .0 .DO .0. 1.40 11.20 2.5 a1.0 51 41 SPRINGDALE 6 OCFCC 624 622 .00005 36 2.83 1.66 $2.1 .13 .CO 1.53 11.38 2.5 >l.0 60 51 600 632 4.93 .DO V 622 620 .0001E 36 10.11 7.09 181.3 .41 .00 12.86 18.63 4.1 >1.0 45 33 620 118 .00018 36 10.2E 6.12 515.1 .89 .00 13.15 19.82 4.3 .1_0 aB 36 SLATER s SPRINGDALE 628 616 .00075 36 10.11 1.09 .0 .00 .00 13.15 19.B3 4A a1.0 a0 36 116 634 .00140 36 14.11 9.95 .0 .00 .00 13.15 19.02 4.3 a1.0 42 21 SLATER c EDWARDS 614 612 .00110 36 13..4 0.73 2137.7 2.89 .00 16.65 23.62 5.2 .1.0 45 36 612 610 .00044 36 815 5.30 .0 .no .DO I6.65 23.12 5.2 >I.o 54 4B SLATER t MAYOR 610 606 .00102 36 12.57 8.3B .1.1 .14 .00 11.11 23.81 S.2 a1.0 48 36 610 10. 1.86 .00 D 606 606 .00375 33 29.09 13.21 884.1 1.61 .00 20.27 29.31 1.4 a1.0 39 21 SLATER 6 GOLDENREST 601 604 .00400 30 15.29 10.38 .0 .00 .DO 20.27 2B.31 8.9 a1.0 39 3D SLATER 41 P.S. mir 604 602 .00800 30 21.12 15.1E .0 .00 .DO .0.27 2B.31 B.9 al.. 36 21 SLATER i RA 102 600 .01030 36 39.69 29.43 .0 .00 -9.38 14..9 21.n 1.5 A9 14.54 SLATER s NICHOLS 600 599 .00074 42 16.13 11.00 0 .00 .00 14.89 21.31 3.4 a1.0 a8 30 BTM, MORG➢N 6 KOLEDG 599 326 .00074 42 16.11 11.00 418.4 1.1E .DC 16.60 23.56 1.. a1.. 51 33 SLATER 6 BEACH W ♦ . . . . . > . . . . . . I . . . . . . . I I . . I I I . AND OF STRIP > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . . 720 718 .00480 IS 2.35 1.36 .0 .00 11.90 11.90 17.34 15.2 a1.0 33 30 718 716 .00580 1B 2.59 1.50 .... .24 .0. 12.14 11.61 I5.5 .1.0 30 30 716 112 .00200 21 4.18 2.53 .0 .00 .0. 12.14 17.61 11.4 a1.0 39 33 a► 4� Boyle ¢nglnearl ng Co[poration Thu, Oct 20, 1994, 3:55 PM Page 5 Sewer Analysis Sanitary Load Applications FACTIP SYSTEM LAST UPDATED Il/29/88 MGD My ME Slope Dia- Capacities: At.. Flow Point Avg. Total Vel- Depth Exceee Under Capac: 'ma OF Dom meter Peek Avg, Input Source Flaw Plow o ity Ratio Avg Cep Repl. Rel'f Identification 712 710 .00200 21 6.18 2.53 .0 .00 .00 12.14 17.67 11.4 •1.. 39 33 em 710 708 .01200 15 2.29 1.32 .0 .00 .00 12.16 19.69 22.3 a1.. 24 21 400 906 ,OD200 21 ..1. 1..3 .0 .Be .00 12.14 17.67 13A a1.0 39 33 1.. 10. .01200 15 2.29 1.32 .0 ... .00 12.14 11.67 12.3 .1.0 21 27 70e 402 .00200 21 4.28 2.53 .0 .00 ... 12.14 lilt 11.4 .1.0 39 13 702 700 .04000 15 4.10 2.53 .0 .00 .00 12.16 17.67 22.3 .1.0 21 21 700 414 .02340 15 1.11 1.81 .0 .00 ... 12.14 17.11 22.3 a1.0 29 29 610 412 .BI.10 21 11.24 7.e3 160.0 .19 -6.93 5.98 9.06 8.1 .64 1.55 412 410 .00880 21 0.76 5.66 .D .0o .00 S... 9.06 7.0 .11 20 B BEACH 6 RDESCENDS _ 410 409 .01000 21 9.If 6.33 .D .00 .00 5... 9.06 7.7 A3 .96 409 408 .01080 21 9.70 6.33 .D .00 6.44 12.32 1,.90 11.5 a1,0 29 21 600 006 .00430 21 6.12 3.04 .0 .00 .to 12.32 19.90 11.5 a1.0 33 20 406 406 .00980 21 1.]6 5.61 .0 .00 .00 12.32 17.90 I1.5 a1.0 30 26 BEACH b CITY LIMIT 404 403 .00430 24 8.99 5.65 .0 .00 .Do 12.32 11.90 ... a1.. 33 20 BEACH 6 LA MIRADA 403 602 .00430 29 1,. 5.65 .0 .00 -6 A6 S... 9.06 5.4 .l] 27 10 402 400 .00240 21 B.94 5.19 .0 .00 .00 5'.. 9,06 4.3 .11 30 8 BEACH BLVD. 600 398 .00550 24 9.8. 6.66 .B .O0 .to 5.88 9.01 6.0 .90 "1 396 396 .00550 30 17.93 12.34 .D .00 11.82 17.70 39.99 1.9 .1.0 36 24 HINGHAM 6 TULARE 396 39< .00113 36 19.27 11.04 .0 .00 .00 17.90 24.9B 5.5 a1.D i2 21 HINGMAN 6 PACIFIC 396 392 .00307 33 17.21 ll.B< .0 .00 .OB 11.10 24.98 1.5 a1.0 39 2l ARTESIA 6 HI.. 392 390 .00133 92 21.62 15.12 .0 .00 .00 11.1. 24.99 9.3 .88 45 21 ARTESIA b ROSTRATA 390 3.8 D0046 02 12.12 8.99 .0 .00 .00 11.1e 39.19 4.0 .1.B S/ 92 ARTESIA b KNOTT 380 386 .00133 42 21,62 15.1E .0 .00 .00 17.70 24.9B 9.3 .Be 45 21 ARTESIA 6 HNOT! 386 384 DOBBS 42 17.29 11.06 .0 .00 .00 17.10 24.99 4.0 a1.0 51 33 HNOrt c EIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E. OP STRIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . Sao SIB 00280 15 1.10 .60 III's A2 .00 .42 ..1 2.6 .62 .1, MOODY 6 CRESCENT Boyle Engineering Corporation Thu. Oct 20, 1994. 3:SS Is Be,. 6 Sever Analysis Sanitary bad Appllcacione KNO T SYSTSM : LART UPDATED 11/29/88 MOD " PH Slope Dia- Capecitiee: Are. F10s Point Avg. Total Vel- Depth Excess Under Capac: ame Up Own meter Peak Avg. Input Source Blow Plow o iry Ratio An Cep Rep1. Ral-f Identification 538 536 .Oo160 15 .84 .M .0 .00 .00 .42 ..1 3.1 .69 .DD MOODY i GRACE sm, 536 536 .D.M 21 6.19 2.94 511.0 1.65 .OD 2.07 3A1 3.6 59 .6] MOODY 6 LINCOLN 536 532 .00116 21 3.18 1.08 .0 .00 .00 2A7 3.67 2.6 .B3 26 12 MWOY a PARR sm, 532 530 .00116 21 3.18 1.06 .0 .00 .00 2.09 3.61 2.6 .81 24 12 ORANGE c n000Y 530 520 .00073 26 3.10 2.16 .0 .00 .00 2.07 3.67 2.2 .13 .09 mes 528 526 .00080 26 3.]] 2.27 266.2 .53 .DO 2.60 6.17 2.3 .as 27 IS DEW. a ORANGE 526 52e .00294 24 1.23 4.60 .0 .00 .00 2.10 6.21 4.0 .52 2.00 OENNI 6 BALL _ 53e 522 .00160 2a 5.33 3.30 522.e 1.01 .00 3.61 5.78 3.3 .E1 21 12 522 520 .00098 21 5.91 3.56 .0 .00 .00 3.61 S.78 2.8 .16 30 8 520 518 .00063 30 6.01 3.00 450.3 1.10 .or 0.71 1.31 3.3 .1.. 33 21 DENNI 6 CERRI'TOS ame SIR ED. .000]2 30 6A9 COB 396.8 1.66 .00 6.35 1.73 3.1 >1.0 36 24 YA'IE1, 6 OEARI 516 516 .00106 30 ].s. 6.99 312.2 1.DO .00 7.65 11.29 3.6 a1.0 36 26 KATTLLA 6 BLPPI.. ass 516 512 .00066 36 9.63 E.43 266.1 .91 .00 8.66 12.65 2.8 >1.0 61 30 LOE Al. Z KATELLA 512 510 .00067 36 0.52 5.50 1... .09 .1. 8.72 13.02 2.1 a1.0 45 30 LOS Al. 6 ORANGEMOOD ass SID SOB .00031 39 9.23 6.00 61.9 .12 .DO 8.86 13.19 2.5 >1.0 65 30 LOS A.. c BRAOBURY 508 506 .00016 39 12.SO P.34 .0 .00 .1. 0.84 13.19 2.9 .79 a2 18 mes BE. 5.6 5.13 .00 V 506 506 .00052 51 22.69 15.9e 2465.1 6.16 .00 20.31 28.36 3.1 >1.0 57 33 RESTSIOE P.S. ass 50e 502 .00066 60 38.52 28.57 899.6 2.19 .30 22.00 31.55 3.2 .72 5.11 YEgrmll ./SEAL SEA 502 500 .00066 60 38.92 28.57 .0 .00 .00 22.60 11.55 3.2 .72 5.11 YESTMIN R/SPRINGOA ame SOO 368 .00025 6] 32.33 23.42 0 .De .00 22.80 31.55 2.6 .81 .62 MESMINSR0./EDMAgDS ♦ . . . . . . r . . . rr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . END OF MIR . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . r . . • was Boyle Engineering Corporation Thu. Dec 20, 1994, 3:55 PM Page ] Sever Analysis Sanitary Load Applications was MOTT SYSTEM LAST UPDATED 11/29/68 ROD MH . Slope Dia- Capacities: Area Flow Point Avg. Total eel- Depth Excess Under Capt: was Up Dow meter Peak Avg. Input Source El ow Plow o iry Ratio Avg Cap Repl. Rel'f Identification •..YARNINME"' ZERO OR NEGATIVE FLOY IN THIS REACH 446 444 .00440 21 12.11 BAS .0 .00 .00 .so .00 .0 .00 8.05 EUCLID TRUNK CONECT, 444 443 .00440 2] 12.11 BAS 19.9 .04 .00 .04 D. 1.5 .01 8101 ORAE3ETHORPE/EUCLID 443 442 .00440 27 12.11 B.OS ]BA .11 .00 .21 .43 2.4 .12 7.84 ORANGETRORPE/ 442 440 .00310 27 10.49 6.09 1584.2 3.17 .00 3.3B 5.45 4.4 .4B 1.50 ORANGETRORPE/ORRHURE 440 434 .00330 27 10.49 6.as 102.6 .34 .00 3.72 5.10 4.5 .51 3.17 ORANGErBORPE/GILBERT 436 434 .00 .00 V 434 432 .00260 24 1.B0 4.30 .0 .DO .00 3.12 B.95 4.1 .6B .SB ORANGETHORPE/PECH➢N was432 430 .00220 39 22.62 16.04 4600.2 5.86 .00 13.58 19.58 5.2 .67 2.46 ORANGETHORPE/MAGNOLI 430 428 .00820 39 44.07 32.79 .0 .00 .00 11.SB 19.50 a.5 .44 11.21 OPANGETHORPE/CAMPUS 428 426 .00780 19 42.98 51.91 111, .21 .Do 13.79 19.86 0.4 .45 18.12 ORARGETHORPE/MA%HELL 426 424 .00240 19 23.84 16.B2 .0 .00 .00 13.19 19.86 5.4 .65 3.03 ORANGETHORPE/SA FNY 424 422 .002B0 39 25.75 19.2B .0 .00 .00 13.79 19.86 5.] .62 4.50 ORANGEI'HORPE/ETANTON 422 420 .00200 39 25.75 IB.2B .0 .00 .00 13.79 19.96 5.7 .62 4.50 ORANGBTFURPE/BEACH 420 394 .00173 4B 15.21 25.69 .0 .00 S. 13.19 19.86 4.B .Si 11.91 ORANGLTIORPE/HES@RN was 3B6 304 11.10 .00 U 304 382 .00032 72 52.65 39.78 .0 .00 .00 31.48 42.45 3.0 .72 0.30 KNOTT 6 ORANGEINORPE was 382 390 .00033 R 53.46 40.45 403.6 1.70 .00 33.16 44.55 3.1 .74 1.28 RNOTI A LA P. 380 370 .0003E 72 55.84 42.41 193.6 .43 3.B9 3].50 49.86 3.2 .79 4.91 REACT 6 CRESENT amp 3]0 376 .0003E 72 55.84 42.41 85.4 .50 .00 38.00 50A0 3.2 A9 4.41 KNOTT 6 LINCOLN 480 376 1.27 .00 U 376 374 .00043 72 61.03 41.71 35.6 11 .00 39.48 52.28 3.5 .76 1.23 MOST c ORANGE 174 372 .00140 63 ]].13 60.25 .0 .so .00 19.4a 52.28 5.6 .63 20.]] 372 370 .0008a 61 61.15 46.B1 233.1 .62 .0O 40.30 53.27 4.1 .]] 6.53 KNOTT 6 BALL ' 370 368 .00114 63 69.60 53.80 82.1 .29 .00 41.50 53.11 5.2 .69 13.31 PRATT 6 CERRITOS 368 366 .00094 66 ]1.]0 55.65 233.9 .as I.00 46.51 60.7B 4.1 A5 9.is KNOTT a RATELLA was 366 364 .00014 66 ]1.]0 55.15 .0 .00 .00 41.51 60.18 4.9 .15 9.15 364 362 .00094 11 71.10 55.65 169.2 .78 .00 41.21 61.72 4.9 .16 B.11 ENOTT 6 OBANGEMOOO Boyle Engineering Corporation :. U. Orr 20. 1914, 3:55 PM Page B Seger Analysis Sanitary Load Applications KPay, SyS ER W UPMTEO 11/29/86 MD MN . Slope Dia. Capacities: Area Fl ov Point Avg. Total Vel- Depth Excess Under Capam Up Men meter Peek Avg. Input Sovrca PI. PI ocity Ratio Avg Cep Repl. Rel-f Identification 362 360 .00094 66 11.10 55.65 196.4 .BB .00 46.17 62.78 4.9 .]] 1.18 NNO L CRARIAN 360 35B A0108 66 16.11 59.08 101.3 1.36 2.4B 52.01 6].3] 5.3 .11 1.81 g1D, 6 LAM a.. 350 356 .00l OB 66 11.19 59.8E .0 .00 .00 52.01 60J7 5.I .11 1.B] 356 354 .00108 66 11.69 59.88 .0 .00 .00 52.01 67.37 5.3 91 ].0] GOLDEN M. 6 G.O. FOR 354 352 .00112 66 70.1E 61.0] .0 .00 .00 52.01 67.37 5.4 .76 9.06 GOLDEN MEET 4 g¢SRL _ 352 350 .00212 66 78.10 61.09 .0 .00 .00 52.01 6].3] 5.4 .76 1.01 GOLDEN WEST 6 TRASH 350 348 .00112 63 69.11 53.47 445A 1.40 .00 53.41 69.04 5.1 .92 .06 now. N./NFSIMINETE _ Soo 348 22.8E .00 U 348 346 .00024 96 98.8E ]8.86 .0 .Do .00 76.21 95.74 3.2 .B6 2.65 GOLDEN M./kESININSTE 346 344 .00024 96 90.8E 1B.B6 .0 .00 .00 76.21 95.74 3.2 .86 2.65 MAIN 6 GOLDEN WEST 344 343 .00026 96 102.79 82.32 986.9 2.I2 .00 7B.54 18.43 3.3 .B5 3.79 RMVER 6 MAIN 450 343 4.12 .00 U 343 342 .00024 96 98.80 78.06 .0 .00 .00 82.66 103.17 3.2 >l.0 99 33 342 340 .00027 96 103.37 82.03 .0 .00 .00 02.61 103.17 3.3 .92 .18 HOOVER a HAZARD 140 338 .00027 96 104.72 04.01 .0 .00 .00 82.66 101.17 3.4 .89 1.35 HOOVER 6 BOL A s 338 336 .00027 96 104.72 84.01 .0 .Do .Go 82.11 IO3.l7 3.4 .B9 1.35 BEACH 6 BOLSA 337 336 1.16 .00 U 336 334 .00032 96 114.09 92.21 .0 .00 .00 10.42 112.05 3.1 .BB 1.]9 NEMLAND 4 BOLSA 334 332 .00035 96 310.91 96.11 1153.9 2.39 .GO 92.81 114.]] 3.9 .B6 3.64 NEWLAND 6 MCFAOOEN 332 330 .00035 96 118.91 96.41 .0 .00 .00 92.81 114.77 3.9 .86 3.64 NEW LA NO 6 EDIMER 330 328 .OD037 96 221.51 98.81 .0 .00 .00 92.91 124.]] 4.0 .B3 6.0E NEWLANO 6 HEIL Wam 328 326 .00037 96 121.59 16.91 .0 .00 .00 12.82 114.T] 4.0 .03 6.00 W.W. 6 MARNER 599 326 16.6E .00 U 326 324 .00046 96 136.53 112.08 111.1 .20 .00 209.61 133.76 4.4 .BB 2.47 SLATER 6 NEMLAND 324 322 .00047 96 I37.12 112.6E 4B.4 .Do .00 D09.69 133.05 4.4 .B] 2.92 MAGNOLIA 6 SW 322 321 .00048 96 139.86 114.11 .0 .00 .00 109.19 133.85 4.5 .06 4.¢8 TALBERT 6 MAGNOLIA 321 320 .00048 96 13e.86 114.16 106.8 .17 .00 109.06 134.04 4.5 .81 4.31 TALBERT a 320 319 .0004E 96 130.06 114.16 .0 DO .00 109.86 134.04 4.5 .B6 4.31 BUSHMD 6 TALBERT Boyle Engineering co`pO"ClOn no. Oct 20. 2996. 3:55 m Page 9 Sever Mal,Ii. Senitery Load Mplicadana MUTT SYSTEM LASS BPOAM IV29/06 FGO . m Slope One- capcicies: "as Flue, Point Avg. Total Vet- depth Excess Under capon a� Up Coun meter Peak Avg. Input Source F10s Floe o ity Ratio An Cap Repl. Rea^ Identification 318 316 .00050 96 141.16 116.22 192.3 .48 .00 110.34 111.$. 4.6 .Ba 5.88 BBSRARO S ELLIS ass 311 314 .00068 96 139.30 116.55 .0 .00 .00 110.3e 134.58 6.5 .16 4.21 BRWgIMST 6 ELLIS 314 312 .0004E 96 139.30 116.55 .0 .00 .00 210.36 134.5B 1.5 .B6 4.21 BR00gNRST L OARFIEL se, 312 310 .00068 96 139.30 134.55 .0 .so .00 110.34 I19.SB 9.5 .B6 9.31 BRW101URST 6 YORATOR 310 30B .0004E 96 131.30 11e.55 .0 AO .00 110.34 136.59 4.5 .86 4.21 BROOgNRST S AOAMS ase I.. 306 .0004E 96 119.30 II4.55 .0 .00 .00 110.36 13e.58 ♦.5 AS 4.21 BROOpMST/SNOIANAPo 306 30e .00040 96 131.30 114.55 .0 ... .00 110.36 136.58 4.5 ... 4.21 BRWpNRST E ATLAMA - 30a 302 .00068 96 139.30 116.55 .0 .00 .00 110J6 136.58 6.5 .81 4.21 BRWMNB0.5T 6 XAMILTO 302 300 .00048 96 139.30 136.55 .0 .00 .00 110Ja 134.5B a.5 .96 all BR.gNRS[ 6 BMMINO ass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M OF ARFA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Boyle Englneerly Corpora caan 1an0 Vae Area Smmury RMT' synI W BRMTEB 11/29/88 MD ES 966.3E LBR 11769.09 !9A 2D9.9a 190P 2795.B1 MR S10.E2 C0.4 2895.14 MIL 3885.12 HIIc 261.6E _ 2NST 959.26 0 2019.B2 _ .B c 00 x o0 cc. 00 .00 1U01.01 M HOLE BIANE R - .22 .. Appendix C Pipe Size Alternate Bo�� [ I 1 ( I ( [ ( [ ( t l l l ( [ l t [ EXHIBIT 9 PROJECT DESIGN FLOWS AND REPLACEMENT SEWER SIZES COMPARISON BETWEEN DOUBLE PARALLEL AND SINGLE PIPE TRUNK SEWER SYSTEMS DOUBLE PIPE PARALLEL SYSYTEM SINGLE PIPE SYSTEM REPLACEMENT SEWER AND MANHOLES EXISTING PARALLEL TOTAL SUB DIA. Q DESIGN Qpeak QPeak Qp A Qpeak EXCESS DIA Qpe4k Qpeek EXCESS AREA STATION STREET LENGTH SLOPE SIZE CAPACITY QNA FLOW CAPACITY FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY SIZE FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY NODE LOCATION (FT) (FT/FT) (IN) (MOD) (MOD) (MOD) (MOD) (MOD) (MGD) (MOD) (IN) (MOD) (MOD) (MOD) 328 107+22 IMPERIAUIIARBOR 127 0.01350 21 10.94 4.93 O.OD 3.45 4.93 1429 936 21 493 10.84 5.91 326 105+95 355 0.01050 21 9.56 5.09 3.35 5.68 8.44 15.24 6.80 21 8.44 9.36 1.12 102+40 579 0.01030 21 9A7 509 3.35 3.09 8.44 12.55 4.11 21 844 9.47 1.03 322 %+62 IMPERIAURXR 395 0M030 21 9.47 5.15 3.35 3.08 8.50 12.55 4.05 21 9.50 9.47 0.97 318 92+77 IMPERIALNILLAGE 530 0.00800 21 8.35 5.61 3.35 3.09 8.96 1143 2.47 24 896 11.92 2.96 87+47 523 0.00800 21 8.35 5.61 335 3.09 896 11.43 2,47 24 &% 11.92 2.96 82+24 675 0.W600 21 7,23 5.61 3.35 3.09 8.% 10.31 1.35 24 8.% 10.32 I36 316 75+49 IMPERIAUCYPRESS 324 0.00550 21 6.92 5AS 3.35 108 9.20 10.00 0.80 24 9.20 9.99 068 72+25 476 0.00550 21 6.92 5.83 3.35 3.09 9.20 10.00 0,80 24 920 9.88 0.68 315 67+49 IMPERIAUEUCLID 500 0.00540 21 6.86 5.85 3.35 3.09 9.20 9.94 0.74 24 920 9.79 0.59 314 62+49 424 0.00540 21 6.86 6.97 4.63 6.30 11.50 13.16 1.66 27 11.50 13AO 190 312 58+25 590 0.00540 21 6.96 6.87 6.36 6.30 13.23 13.16 -0.07 27 13.23 13.40 0.17 310 52+35 423 0+0000 21 747 746 6,36 6.30 13.92 13.77 4.05 27 13.82 14.59 0.77 ( 1 1 ( [ t [ [ [ [ ( [ ( ( [ [ ( 1 f EXHIBIT 9 PROJECT DESIGN FLOWS AND REPLACEMENT SEWER SIZES COMPARISON BETWEEN DOUBLE PARALLEL AND SINGLE PIPE TRUNK SEWER SYSTEMS DOUBLE PIPE PARALLEL SYSYTEM SINGLE PIPE SYSTEM REPLACEMENT SEWER AND MANHOLES EXISTING PARALLEL TOTAL SUB DIA. Q DESIGN Qpeak QNak QVeak Qpeak EXCESS DIA QNak QPeak EXCESS AREA STATION STREET LENGTH SLOPE SIZE CAPACITY Qpeak FLOW CAPACITY FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY SIZE FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY NODE LOCATION (FT) (FT/FT) (IN) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (MOD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (M) (MGD) (MGD) (MOD) 306 48+12 IMPERIAUWALNUT 537 0.01530 21 1154 767 670 6.99 14.37 18.53 4.16 27 14.37 22.56 8.19 42+75 500 D.OD330 24 7.65 7.67 63D 6.99 14.37 14.M 0.27 30 14.37 13.88 -OA9 37+75 322 D.OD330 24 7.65 t67 630 6.99 1437 14 64 0.27 30 14.37 13.88 .0.49 34+53 276 0+00330 24 7.65 7.67 670 6.99 14.37 14.64 0.27 30 14.37 13.88 41.49 304 31+77 600 000330 24 7.65 7.67 6.70 6.99 14.37 14.64 027 30 1437 13.98 4)49 25+77 600 0.00490 24 9.23 7.67 690 699 14.37 16.22 1.85 30 14.37 16.74 2.37 19+77 299 0.0N90 24 9.23 7.67 6.70 6.99 14.37 16.22 1.85 30 14.37 16.74 2.37 302 16+79 301 00W80 24 9.23 7.67 6.70 11.44 14.37 20.67 6.30 30 14.37 16.74 2.37 13+78 511 DAD480 24 9.23 7.67 6JD 9.37 14.37 I7.60 3.23 30 14.37 16.74 2.37 30D 08+67 IMPERIAUPRIVATE 593 D.00480 24 9.23 7.81 670 8.50 14.51 17.73 322 30 14.51 16.74 2.23 02+74 119 0.003W 39 26.M 7.81 6.70 8.50 14.51 35.14 20.63 39 14.51 26.64 12.13 228 01+55 114 0.00300 39 26.64 23.89 0A0 23.99 23.99 50.53 26.64 39 23.89 26.64 2.75 00+41 IMPERIALNEACH STATION EQUATION EXHIBIT 9 PROJECT DESIGN FLOWS AND REPLACEMENT SEWER SIZES COMPARISON BETWEEN DOUBLE PARALLEL AND SINGLE PIPE TRUNK SEWER SYSTEMS DOUBLE PIPE PARALLEL SYSYTEM SINGLE PIPE SYSTEM REPLACEMENT SEWER AND MANHOLES EXISTING PARALLEL TOTAL SUB DIA. Q DESIGN Qpeak Qpeak Qpeak Qpc& EXCESS DIA Qpeak Qpcak EXCESS AREA STATION STREET LENGTH SLOPE SIZE CAPACITY QpeA FLAW CAPACITY FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY SIZE FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY NODE LOCATION (FT) H` /FT) (IN) (MGD) (MOD) (MOD) (MOD) (MOD) (MGD) (MGD) (IN) (MOD) (MGD) (MOD) 160+40 IMPERIAUBEACH IN 800300 39 26.64 23.99 0.00 000 2189 26.64 2.75 39 23.89 26.64 2,75 226t720 159+36 554 0.00620 33 24.53 17.34 7.97 9.43 25.31 32.96 7.65 39 25.31 3929 12.99 153+92 475 0.00340 33 18.16 1734 7.97 943 2531 26.59 128 39 2531 29.36 305 149+07 308 0.00340 33 18.16 17.34 7.97 $43 25.31 26.59 1.28 39 25.31 23.36 3.05 145+99 155 0.00340 33 18.16 17.34 7.97 843 2531 26.59 1.28 39 2531 28.36 3.05 144+44 128 0.00340 33 HL16 17.34 7.97 8.43 25.31 26.59 1.29 39 25.31 28.36 3.05 143+16 BEACHICHEVRON 91 0.00520 33 2246 17.34 7.97 8.43 25.31 30.99 5.58 39 2531 35.07 9,76 142+25 575 0.00590 33 23.72 17.34 7.97 8.43 25.31 32.15 6.84 39 25.31 37.03 1132 136+50 533 O.OD580 33 23.72 17.34 7.97 9.43 25.31 32.15 6.94 39 25.31 37.03 11.72 1+17 671 0.00340 33 18.16 17.67 7.97 9.43 25.M 26.59 095 39 25.64 28.36 2.72 716 124+40 646 0.00340 33 19.16 17.67 805 8.16 25.72 26.32 0.60 39 25.72 28.36 2.64 117+94 BEACHMILISBOROUGH 712 112+90 I 500 0.0000340 33 16.16 T7.67 8.05 8.16 25.72 26.32 0.D 39 25.72 29.36 2.64 EXHIBIT 9 PROJECT DESIGN FLOWS AND REPLACEMENT SEWER SIZES COMPARISON BETWEEN DOUBLE PARALLEL AND SINGLE PIPE TRUNK SEWER SYSTEMS DOUBLE PIPE PARALLEL SYSYTEM SINGLE PIPE SYSTEM REPLACEMENT SEWER AND MANHOLES EXISTING PARALLEL TOTAL SUB DIA. Q DESIGN Q,[ QKA QPcek QPuk EXCESS DIA Q"A Qy--k EXCESS AREA STATION STREET LENGTH SLOPE SIZE CAPACITY Q,A FLOW CAPACITY FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY SIZE FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY NODE LOCATION (FT) (FTIM (IN) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGO) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (IN) (MOD) (MGD) (MGD) 710 107+90 500 0.00340 33 18.16 17.67 805 8.16 25.72 2632 060 39 25,72 28.36 2.64 708 102+90 600 0.00340 A 19.16 ITO 9.05 9.16 25.72 26.32 0.60 39 25.72 28.36 2.64 704 96-N 8 0.00340 33 18.16 1]67 805 8.16 25.72 26.32 0.60 39 25.72 28.36 2.64 96+92 332 0.0N50 33 20.89 17.67 8.05 8.16 25.72 29.05 3.33 39 25.72 32.62 690 93-50 516 0.00450 33 2099. 17.67 805 8.16 25.72 2905 3.33 39 25.72 32.62 6.90 702 88+34 00 0.01566 33 3898 17,67 8.115 6.26 25.72 45.24 19.52 39 25.72 60.85 35,13 700 82+34 601 0.01566 33 38.98 17.67 8.05 9.24 25.72 41L22 22.50 39 25.72 WAS 35.13 2191414 76+33 282 001370 30 28.28 16.94 9.06 11.24 26.00 39.52 13.52 39 2600 56.92 3092 217 73+51 500 0.01370 30 28.29 16.94 9.06 8.76 26.00 37.04 HIM 39 26.00 56.92 30.92 68+51 323 001370 30 28.28 16.94 9.06 8.76 26.00 37.04 1LN 39 26.00 5692 30.92 215 65+29 BEACIVROSECRANS 577 0.01800 30 32.41 17.14 906 9.70 26.20 42.11 1591 39 26.20 65.24 3904 59+51 M4 0.00640 30 19.33 17.14 9.06 9.70 26.20 29.03 2S3 39 26.20 39.90 12.70 409/213 53+07 6 0.02667 30 39.45 17.9 8.31 10.44 26.21 49.89 23.69 39 26.21 79.42 53.21 53+01 EXHIBIT 9 PROJECT DESIGN FLOWS AND REPLACEMENT SEWER SIZES COMPARISON BETWEEN DOUBLE PARALLEL AND SINGLE PIPE TRUNK SEWER SYSTEMS DOUBLE PIPE PARALLEL SYSYTEM SINGLE PIPE SYSTEM REPLACEMENT SEWER AND MANHOLES EXISTING PARALLEL TOTAL SUB DIA. Q DESIGN Qpeh Qpcek Qpuk QPe4k EXCESS DIA Qpok Qpu EXCESS AREA STATION STREET LENGTH SLOPE SIZE CAPACITY Q1e4k FLOW CAPACITY FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY SIZE FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY NODE LOCATION (FT) (FT/FT) (IN) (MOD) (MGD) (MOD) (MOD) (MOD) (MGD) (MOD) (IN) (MGD) (MOD) 1 (MGD) 547 0,01240 30 26.90 17.9 9.31 10.44 2621 37.34 11.13 39 26.21 54.15 2794 47+54 600 0.01240 30 26.W 179 881 I0A4 2621 37.34 11.13 39 26.21 54.15 27.94 41+54 600 0.01240 30 26.90 IT9 9.31 10.40 26.21 37.30 1109 39 2621 54.15 2794 35+54 600 0,01240 30 26.W IT9 BJI ION 2621 37,34 11.13 39 26.21 54.15 27.% 408 29+54 BEACC30CAMERON 574 0.01240 30 26.90 179 8.64 10.44 2654 37.34 10.90 39 26.M 54.15 2761 406 23+90 490 000500 33 22.02 IT9 871 10.44 26.61 32.46 5.85 39 26.61 34.39 7.79 19-N 600 0W500 33 22.02 179 9.71 10.44 26.61 32,46 5.85 39 26.61 34.39 7.79 404 13+00 BEACH/MALVERN 219 000400 33 19.70 IT9 829 9.24 2669 28.% 2.25 39 26.69 3076 4.07 10+82 STATION EQUATION 63+19 BEACH/MALVERN 427 0.00400 33 19.70 IT9 8.79 924 26.0 2694 2.25 39 26.69 30.76 4.07 58+92 523 0.00340 33 19.16 17.9 8.79 9.24 26.69 27.40 071 39 2669 29.36 1.67 403214 53+69 BEACKSTAGE 557 O.W580 33 23.72 IT64 9.06 9.74 26.70 32.46 5.76 39 26.70 37.03 10.33 48+12 DODDSISTAGE 329 000580 33 2172 IT" 9.N 9.74 2630 32.46 5J6 39 26.70 37.03 10.33 [ 1 [ 1 1 [ f [ 1 1 EXHIBIT 9 PROJECT DESIGN FLOWS AND REPLACEMENT SEWER SIZES COMPARISON BETWEEN DOUBLE PARALLEL AND SINGLE PIPE TRUNK SEWER SYSTEMS DOUBLE PIPE PARALLEL SYSYTEM SINGLE PIPE SYSTEM REPLACEMENT SEWER AND MANHOLES EXISTING PARALLEL TOTAL SUB DIA. Q DESIGN Opeak QPeA Qpeak Qpcak EXCESS DIA Qpcak Qpeak EXCESS AREA STATION STREET LENGTH SLOPE SIZE CAPACITY Qpeak FLOW CAPACTTY FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY SIZE FLOW CAPACITY CAPACITY NODE LOCATION (FT) (FT/FT) (IN) (MGD) (MGD) (MOD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (IN) (MGD) (MOD) (MGD) 44483 DODDS/R7(R 237 0.01260 33 34.% 17.64 906 8.74 2610 43.70 17.00 39 200 54.59 27.89 212 42+46 TULARE/RXR 324 0.01260 33 3C% 19.13 9.06 9.74 27.19 43.70 16.51 39 27.19 54.59 27.40 39+22 KINGMANITULARE 12 0.01260 33 34.96 24.99 9,06 8.74 34,04 43.70 9.66 39 34 M 54.59 20.55 2101399 39+10 KINGMANTTULARE 560 000370 39 29.59 2498 1.37 8.94 2635 38.52 1117 39 26.35 29.58 323 33+50 404 0.00370 39 29.58 2498 1.37 IL" 2635 39.52 12.17 39 26.35 29.59 3.23 29+46 172 0.WM0 39 38.90 24.98 2.26 8.% 27,24 47.94 20.60 39 27.24 38.% 11.66 27+74 KINGMAN/CREEK 547 0.00280 39 25.73 24.99 2.26 a." 2724 34.67 143 42 27.24 31.35 4.11 22+27 5M 0.00280 39 25.73 24.98 2.26 894 2714 34.67 7.43 42 27.24 31,35 4.11 17+27 492 0.00280 39 2573 24.98 226 K94 2724 34.67 7.43 42 27.24 31.35 4.11 3% 12+35 ARTESIA/KINGMAN 625 000280 39 25.73 24.98 218 8.94 2126 34.67 7.41 42 27.26 31.35 4.09 06+10 ARTESIA/WESTERN 392 0.00280 39 2573 2498 2.28 8.94 2716 34.67 7.41 42 27.26 31.35 4.09 02+18 18 0.00290 39 25.73 2498 2.28 8.94 27.26 34.67 7.41 42 27.26 31.35 409 02+00 197 0.W280 39 25A 24.98 2.28 844 27.26 34.67 7.41 42 27.26 31.35 4.09 392 00+03 ARTESIA/ROSTRATA ® JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS MEETING AGENDA FOR NOVEMBER 9, 1994 DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 Agenda Item 34: Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, and consideration of resolution receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for said project to Wal-Con Construction Company in the total amount of $1,985,000. Summary U Attached is a Staff Report dated November 3, 1994 that provides details on this project. Also attached is the bid tabulation and recommendation. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, changing the date for receipt of bids from October 11, 1994 to October 13, 1994, and making miscellaneous tehcnical clarifications; and adopting Resolution No. 94-132, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for.said project to Wal-Con Construction Company in the total amount of$1,985,000. wpdw\pdc%U2-1 1W 94 -1- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS M ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA ' 1O E"AVENUE November 3, 1994 PO WX81V FWMMNVALUy..L IFOP WIM8127 ffmm2 n STAFF REPORT Actions re Replacement of Pacific Coast Hiahway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3 Contract No. 5-37-3 In September 1994, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-37-3. This is the final phase of work to replace the old Plan 401 gravity sewer along Pacific Coast Highway in Newport Beach between Newport Boulevard and the Bitter Point Pump Station. In addition to the work along Pacific Coast Highway, this contract includes work for the City of Newport Beach which was approved under a reimbursement agreement at the same Board meeting in September. (1) Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications adds a section to the detailed specifications and three bid items to the schedule of prices to allow for processing and disposition of anticipated gasoline contamination at PCH and Balboa Boulevard as a result of a recent environmental investigation conducted and tabulated in a report dated October 6, 1994 by Converse Consultants. (2) Award of Contract On October 13, 1994, ten bids were received for said contract. The bids ranged from a high of$3,296,866 to a low of$1,985,000 submitted by Wal-Con Construction Company. Staff recommends approving Addendum No. 1 and award of a construction contract to Wal-Con Construction Company, the low bidder, in the amount of$1,985,000,00; A complete bid tabulation and recommendation is attached. 32-nov.sr VF✓ RESOLUTION NO. 94-132 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 5-37-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, PHASE 3, CONTRACT NO. 5-37-3 .................................. The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which is a portion of the previously-approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the District's Board of Directors on July 19, 1989; and, . � Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Wal-Con Construction Company for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, be awarded to Wal-Con Construction Company, in the total amount of 51 ,985,000.00in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 5, acting for itself and as agent for District No. 6, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 9, 1994. �_� Rcxo.132 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA October 13, 1994 11:00 a.m. 1oe44¢us AVENUE 1 Addendum va.Box6127 FoUVrAw VLL ..MIMRNIA 927- nln8e2x11 BID TABULATION Contract No.5.37-3 PROJECT TITLE: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer. between Bitter Point Pum Station and The Arches(Newport Boulevard) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Gravity sewers and appurtenances in Pacific Coast Hinhwav from Bitter Point Pump Station to the Arches(Newport Boulevard). and modifications of connection of City of Newport Beach sewers to Bayside Drive trunk sewer for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6.and aravrN sewers and appurtenances and abandonment of a pump station in Balboa Boulevard for the City of Newport Beach. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $2,200,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT:$4.370,000.00 TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID 1. Wal-Con Construction Co.,Surfside,CA $1,985,000 2. KEC Company,Corona, CA $2,068,892 3. Peter C. David Co., Inc.,Laguna Hills,CA $2,207,007 4. Mladen Buntich Construction Co.,Inc.,Sunland,CA $2,228,646 5. Steve Bubalo Construction Co.,Inc.,Monrovia,CA $2262,076 6. Mike Prlich&Sons, South El Monte,CA $2,391,644 7. Vdo Artukovich&Son, Inc.,South El Monte, CA $2,425,527' 8. Albert W. Davies Inc. Rancho Cucamonga CA $2,710,000 9. Miramontes Construction Co. City of Industry,CA $2,765,478 10. Colich& Sons,Gardena,CA $3,296,866 'Corrected Total. I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above rojecFe9 n hatpin low id is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Wal-Con Construction Co.'f ISe ti a t 6 of$1 85. s the lowest and best bid. IF Blake P.Atdersm - DirecEor of EngineferkV Which cO11StrUetion project They will then apply temporary asphalt' unknown soil condiuons that delay tli2 Will be taking place In my until the wholestreetis Complete wool Delivery of materials can also They will then return and lay,permanent temporarily smp a project,Construction neighborhood? asphalt,new snipping,and.do anyother workers someume5 accidently run into or - work needed tomake sure everything ., damage other utility lines that they didnt In May 1994,we began die"Baker-C.rsler ._ returns to the condition iewas in before - know existed,and repairs-must bo In[eriepmr Sewer.Project." This project . ' - the work began. -"completed before the job can moraine. extends from Baker Street and Fairview ! - Other miscellaneous delays could he AvctoQsIcr Ave and Iowa Street. We are inyralGng new sewer pipes that range in I NOW might this work effect. catrsodby finding epntaminated soil:or -size from 8 to 90ir"es. The contractor me end ally famlly?- archeological artifacts: pcdotirung the-work is Mladen Buntich - . z ' Construction Co. Construction impacts include an inereasr What Can 1 A tO millfllfiZe - " in heavy[nick traffic dust and. noise.' or protect myself and my The portion of the job that will.evenmally There may be inud on-the street from the family from C0113trYCt"On-- be taking place in yourneighborhood water trucks controlling the dust Some activity? began:Octolier S inside the Mesa Verde Aandsmping may he disturbed. " • - Country Club and will end at Gisler Ave - - Heavy equipment and.large pipes tend to and:lowaStreetineadYMaY." - Wllatare.yOY'dOing #O atttactrliildren. IttattUetyoar children to minimize."Me.of these afay clear of all construction acavlaeato 'Why is this project "impacts?' avoid any possible Injuries. necessary? , Take alternate traffic mutes to avoid the -- - _ Qenstructinn:wiB not begin until 830 a.m construction area. Most imporranrly,call This new sewer line will carry wastewater a sand will be'i»mplete by 6:00 p.m each.: - us and iet us know what problem,you r from an increase in service needs iderul i6d `. work day. We will be watering down the are having so that we;can respond to your in our Master Plan in the vines oMosta - area tocontrol the dust.:All landscaping- concerns assoon as pnssiMe.' Mesa,Tustin and Irvi. ine. ` ' that might.be.disturbed will fie returned;. ♦ to its"as was"condition. A catch basin W. ho-do 1 call if t have any _. What exactly will be 'located ar the of the street will be Questions, concerns or 11- happening in'my Streetv temporarily removed and rite cnnvactnr �problemsv will control any possible street flooding-- " The contractor will post signs notifying you . ' frgrn rains• - (`,all our ad inis ice., [ 'of the pending work. A"staging"or work (714)-962- 17 a sk for co trucdnn "area will he identified and heavy What would make the mandgem c ave:pC C . el at our equipmentwill be brought to thq site in construction Schedule - . site 24"hou d•can pond preparation for the work. Traffic controls .I run late? quickly ro any e(nergen ;, necessary) . .will beset no and the Contractor will start ' . . . •. . . - •^-:" . _ atone end-of the street and'dig a series of". ' - .-We apohVize for this la trenches toil r than.500 feet to j>espite"months of caieful._Planning, Many - ice arse n& Incogvenfence arid: He may close up to 1,000 feet of street ro -unforeseen situations votive delay Constmer thank you for secure-the work-area, Afrer l the i projects- months, we mRve into the winter . eying P Pe. :' months,the number one problem is .-:: .: yow copperadon . the workers will deposit several layers of weathec:Constmetion work can not. !. and patience." .covet material over the pipe to secure is proceed ih the rain. Sometimes there are i ' What Are All These People Doing in My F _ Neighborhood ? ; The Countv Sanitation Districts of Orange Caunty provide the wastewater management services for your community to protect - - public health and the environment. We work hard to plan for future service needs so that we can contimie to provide reliable service. This means that sometimes we must at are constructor upgrade our facilities for collecting and transporting wastewater. These People The fallowing is a list of Doing in My common questions and answers that hopcfolly will help ease your concerns and help you Neighborhood ? understand the project and its / impacts. orw a Orange County Sanitation Districts' Sewer Construction Project Construction Management {� yn County santation Districts of Orange County _ •y�/or7Jn9 W P.0.8127 Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 7 (714)962-2411 7-0100trow'I , todQy REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN �@ 11 -9-94 1) Adoption of Resolutions of Appreciation for Retiring Directors. Because of recent counsel reorganizations, several Directors are retiring from the Boards. I would therefore like to introduce for the Boards' consideration, adoption of resolutions expressing appreciation to the retiring Directors and recognizing their outstanding contributions to our wastewater management program. Resolution Number Director City/Agency District 94-136 A. B. "Buck" Catlin Fullerton 2 & 3 94-136 Iry Pickier Anaheim 2, 3 & 13 94-137 Carrey J. Nelson Brea 2 94-138 Richard Partin Cypress 3 94-139 Linda Moulton-Patterson Huntington Bch 3 94-140 Grace Winchell Huntington Bch 11 94-141 William D. Mahoney La Habra 2 94-142 Evelyn Hart Newport Beach 6 94-143 Phil Sansone Newport Beach 7 94-144 James A. Wahner' Costa Mesa 6 & 7 Sanitary District 'Behind in election returns with absentee votes not yet counted and losing margin is just under 200. - Item 1 continued on next page - We will ask each of them to return at a future meeting for a formal presentation of their resolutions. 2) Resolution of Appreciation for Wayne Sylvester. As you know, Wayne is retiring as General Manager at the end of the year. I know we would all like to acknowledge his efforts and more than 35 years with the agency. We have drafted a resolution of appreciation. It reads in part: (John, see resolution) - Do I hear a motion for approval ... (wait for MSA) Having adopted the resolution, I would like staff to circulate it among the Directors for your signatures. Please use the pen that's provided in the folder. 3) ASCE Plaque Presentation. It gives me great pleasure to introduce Fred J. Meier, Chairman of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Orange County Branch of the History and Heritage Committee. Mr. Meier, with the support of ASCE member John B. Howe, has been working with our public information staff for two years to assemble an extensive compilation of documents tracking the Districts' history. Here is the completed history and application that was created by their efforts (hold up application). It's filled with old documents and vintage photos of the Districts. It's interesting reading and provides a dramatic picture of how far the Districts and Orange County have come since our humble beginnings. - Item 3 continued on next page - I would like to thank Mr. Meier and Mr. Howe for recommending the Sanitation Districts for this prestigious designation. Mr. Meier, please step up to the podium to conduct the presentation. (Fred will say a few words and then introduce John Howe, other dignitaries from ASCE and then have the president of the LA Chapter, Paul Taylor, speak.) (John note: The ASCE plans for the whole presentation to take about 10 minutes.) 4) _Upcoming Meetings. A. Finance & Personnel Committee - The Finance & Personnel Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday. November 16th, at 5:30 p.m. - Item 4 continued on next page - B. Steering Committee - The Steering Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, November 30th. at 4:30 p.m. C. Executive Committee - The Executive Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday. November 30th. at 5:30 p.m. D. District 7 Selection Committee Meeting - The District 7 Selection Committee is scheduled to meet on Thursday. December 1 , 1994 at 5:00 p.m. E. Planning, Design and Construction Committee - The Planning, Design and Construction Committee is scheduled to meet on Thursday December 1 at 5:30 p.m. - End of Report - j:\wpdoc\g m\jcrpts\j c 11.94 yM0ETI1vO DATE: November 9. 1994 TIME: 7:30 P.m. DISTRICTS: 1 2, 3.S,B, ] 11, 13 8 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS IBEYERI ............ BARRERA . . ... .. . . . ✓ ISEYERI .. ........... GAMMA ......... JG IREADEI ............ PERRYMAN .... . . . . .. (LASZLO I ............ BROWN ........... . — MUTZI ............. MC OUIGAN ..... . . . .. INORBY) ............. 1 1 .......... — ISTEINEw ........... STANTON ........ y ISCOTI) ............. COLUNS .......... — (SALTARELLE ........ Y/G111£Y .......... L RIESAW ............. . COX _ (SANSONE) ...... .. DEBAY ........... JL — ISELL1 ............... DENES . DISTRICT NELSON) ............ .......... — (SCOTT) . ........... COLLINS .......... ✓ IMAERTZWERERI ...... ECKENRODE ....... — (DALY) ............. PIOOER........... Jr MEADEI ............. PERRYMAN ........ JG — OKEYERI ............ BARRERA .......... ✓ (MAHONEY)........... FLORA . .......... I MORBYI ............ 1 1........... ✓ (GONE) .............. GRIFFIN . .......... �1 e — ISELL) .............. GENES ............ Je IWELCHI ............. iY4N..BN ........ (MAERT2WEILEII I ..... ECKENRODE ........ y/ IWARDI ............. HAMMOND ........ �W — IFLORAI ............ 1WHONEY ......... JG MGM ............... HART ............ (PARKER ..........4 NELSON ..4.4...... .. (MOULTON�PATTERWIB.. LEIPZIG . . ......... — ILUTi9 ....4.4..... ........... yI IMNERI ............. MIN ............. ISTEINERI ....4...... STANTON ......... wG (MC GUIGANI ....4.... WTZ............. — IOULLDLSOp......... WELCH ........... . (FLORAI ............. MAHONEY......... JI (SINGER) ............ ZUMET ........... Ae (LUTZI ...4.......... MC GU..AM........ — (PULMO) ............. MOREHo .......... DISTRICTS MINTAILLEI .... ...... MOULTONiAT1ENHON — (ESTRADAI .......... SAPIEN ........... L (PARKER ............ NELSON .......... — (NELSON) ...........^BMxMM.......... me (DUNLAP) ............ PARKER........... �( — (LASZLOI ........... BROWN ........... be (NICHOLSON .......,. PARTN ........... l — MDRBY) ............ ( 1........... IDALY) .............. PICKIER .......... JG — (SCOTO ............ COLLINS .......... t IWORLEYI ............ PI)TTS ........... JL — (MAHONEY).......... FLORA .........--- ILUTZ) .............. JAIYBp........... (BONE) ............. GRIFFIN ........... I OVANSI ............. RILE ............. — IMNEw ............ UM ............. — (PUTTS) ............. SALTARELL........ L INC GUIGANI ........ IJM ............. IDEBAYI ............. SANSOIE ......... JC — (ROBOAREEI ......... MOULTO TT91MM1 .7 IESTRADAI ........... SAPIEN ........... . — WICHOW014 .......4 PARTN ....4...... ✓ RLAKETI............. SINGER ........... JG — (EVANSI ............ RILE ........ J/ STANTON ........... STENER .......... .V —.. .. * IMILLERI ............. SWAN............ JG _ RLAKET)..........:: SINGER ........... — ISELVAGGB ........... SYLVM ........... — ISELVAG ... ........ STANTONYLVIA . ......... IPFARY/SCHFAFER ..... WAHNER.......... . _ ISELVAGGII . ....... SYLVM ........... JL IGULUXSONI .......... WELCH ........... . — (SANSDISTRIYT NEI IROBTARELUAIILUEl ....4..... IM-210WINCHE........... — — (SANSONEI .. . ....... DEBAY............ J/ (SALTARE... ......... WOBLE ...4....... •� — ISNOERI ............. ZLAKET........... (STANTON) .. . ....... STEINER........... ✓ JL NEBAYI . ... . .I..... COX ............. 7 STAFF OTHERS DISTRICTS SYLVESTER . WOODRUFF .. Jg!f (PERRY) ............ WAHNER .......... JG ANDERSON . y/ ANWAR..... (COX) .............. HART....... ✓ BERENSON . ,/ DEMUR......Je ....— ISTANTO.. MINER � FLEMNG .......... ER........... / HODGES .. . �� HOHENER ... DISTRICT] KYLE .... . J/ HOUGH ..... — (WARD) ... ..... . . .. HAMMOND......... �G LINDER .... JG HOWARD ... IPOTTSI .......... .. SALTAREW ........ NELLOR ... JC HUNT ...... — _1G NICHOLS . .. MOM ..... y IBEYER) ... . ... ... BANE .......... JL IPULIDOI ...4.4.... .. MORENO .......... y —_ OOTEN .... _ I LEE ........ 11 IDEBAYI SANSONE STREED ... J/ LINDSTROM.. _ ............ ......... JG VNCENT... : NIXON...... ISMEAREI .......... STEINEWAHINE ........... JG TAILED! ... . MAW. ..... — ISCNFAFFAI . . ....... WANNER .......... �� SO . STONE ..... DISTRICT 11 WASON. .... �L ' L — UROSHAILLEI . ........ WNCHELL ......... J� YOUNG . . . .. — UMOULT l .PATTERS.... LEIPZIG .. ....... �/ ' 1{I� ZU ' A/ �L DISTRICT I3 1x •I. lv ( /"""�'� (WELCH( ..... . . ..... IEYER) .. ... .. . ... PARKER ........... MEYEw � � .QF_✓4.'M-'^'r'D``{I' �• /^'- ... ... . . . ... GARRER . .e .......... .. STANTON) . ....... .. STED®1........... DISTRICT 14 C,WARD)) . .. . . . ... . . . SWAN WS......... i (WARD) ... . . . .... . . HAIr1011.......... . � _ MORLI . .. . . ..... . . BARRBM.......... y/ DL102 (STANTY) . . ... . . . . PDT.. ............ y/ 11/09196 ISTANTONI . . . . . .... . SIF.®1........... S/ _ PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY November 9 , 1994 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION FIRM Please Print Please Print iN� �E �5p SUI 2 s1 11/09/94- JOINT BOARD MEETING N6a - Report of Joint Chair JC: As you know this is going to be the last meeting for many of or several of our representatives here. So, I would like to have the Board consider a motion for adopting a resolution, expressing the appreciation of the retiring Directors and recognizing their outstanding contributions to our Waste Water Management Program. We will ask them to come back to a future meeting for a presentation on these resolutions. Just to recognize them, the ones that I, 1 hope I'm right about this, and you can correct me if I'm wrong, but Buck Catlin, yeah, I know they're still counting the votes in some places. Buck Catlin has left us. Iry Pickier, this is his last night. I am sure we will see him around town in many places. Carrey Nelson, is he with us tonight? I am sorry, Carrey, didn't see you. This is his last meeting. Richard Partin, Dick Partin. Linda Moulton-Patterson, Linda. Bill Mahoney, there you are, Bill. I am glad you came to this last meeting, Bill. I was beginning to worry about you. Grace Winchell is also one of those. Evelyn Hart. This is Evelyn's last meeting I believe. Phil Sansone. And not by his own choosing, Jim Wahner, is going to see his last meeting with us. Have I left anybody out? Thank you all for the contribution that you've made and may I have a motion for a resolution? OK. I see no opposition, so I'll consider that unanimous. I also have a resolution here that we prepared for Wayne Sylvester. As you know, he is retiring. We've talked about this many times. It is quite a document. It describes his history and the many things that he has done. I've started the signing process and so rather than read the resolution, I will pass it on to Peer and then pass it on to the rest of you. We'd like each one of you to sign it and recognize Wayne for the tremendous contribution that he has put forth for the Board for years and years and years. Next we have a presentation from Fred Meier. Fred, are you in the audience? Why don't you come forward, Fred, while I introduce you. It gives me great pleasure to introduce Fred, Chairman of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Orange County Branch of the History and Heritage Committee. Mr. Meier, with the support of the ASCE member John B. Howe, has been working with our public information staff for two years to assemble an extensive compilation of documents tracking the Districts' history. Here is the completed history report that they have put together and we are certainly appreciative of all the work that they have done. It's filled with old documents and vintage photos of the Districts. It's interesting reading and provides a dramatic picture of how far the Districts have come here in Orange County from our humble beginnings. Again, I would like to thank Mr. Meier and Mr. Howe for recommending the Sanitation Districts for this prestigious designation. Why don't you give us a little background on this report if you would, Fred. Fred Meier: OK. Thank you, Mr. Cox. Well of course it gives me a great deal of pleasure i to take part in this program. The American Society of Civil Engineers have a regular program throughout, it's actually international now, for recognition of historic civil engineering projects. This is one for Orange County. We want to give thanks to the Officials of the Districts here that have helped us in developing this history. Making the nomination, especially Corinne Berenson, who is very helpful and very friendly and got out a lot of information for us to look over. We recognize that there has been some bad publicity recently for the Districts, but that doesn't in our opinion detract from the greatness of the facilities of this District, or the various Districts. What I remember is that I came here in 1953. 1 remember that occasionally there was contamination to the beaches down near the outfall sewer. In 1954,there was an outfall that was constructed. It was a 78" sewer, 1.4 miles out into the ocean. As I remember looking back, I thought that that probably had cured that contamination, but I'm afraid that there was some after that. But then the ten foot diameter outfall sewer that was extended five miles out into the ocean to a depth of 200 feet was really a remarkable feat. The engineering that went into that was superb and that certainly has cured the contamination of the beaches. Every so often we hear of the sewage spills at Bologna Creek and LA City facilities and I am thankful that we have what we have here in Orange County. I also remember back to the men that I knew personally in the old days that designed a lot of this work. I personally knew Natt Knaoo (soil and Sid Lowery, Lester Boyle and Lee Nelson. I didn't know Bob Barletta personally, but I read about him a lot because he was always mentioned in the instructions to bidders and I was working on bids for construction projects and anytime you wanted to connect to the facilities of the District, y;e�do' ne have Bob Barletta around to approve it. Cgineers have been involved in the design ever since I can remember. I think a tremendous job. These were great men and the public and the politicians listened to them and had faith in them. They were able to secure a financing and get their projects built and they kept ahead of the tremendous growth that was experienced here in Orange County which is one of the greatest explosions in population in the world. They got the job done and they still are ahead of it. In contrast to what we have now, my gosh, the transportation corridors that we have, the continuous conflict of people that don't accept what the engineers have to tell them that what they feel their needs are. The El Toro Marine Base is another example. It's like pulling their teeth to get anything built these days. With that, I would like to introduce Jack Howe, this was really his idea, to develop this history. I worked with him, but he is the prime mover of this project. Jack Howe. Jack Howe: Thank you very much, Fred. Actually Fred took a leading part in working with me on this project. We worked side by side through most of the project. It started this way about two years ago at one of our meetings. The idea of studying the County Sanitation Districts project came to mind. I immediately volunteered to make the study the history of it because I personally had in a minor way involvement with the design and construction over the years. 2 The first thing I did, on suggestion of George Osburn, who many of you may know as Director of the EMA, he said, "Well, call Tom Dawes. He'd be the first one to start with the District." That is what I did. After talking to Tom, he thought the idea was great. He thought this would be wonderful to have a study of the Sanitation Districts of Orange. He told me when we first thought that we would pick out maybe one or two physical features like a bar screen or a clarifier or some other structure to make that the subject of our historical landmark. However, Tom said, "Well, all the old structures are gone. They've been destroyed. Everything is new now." Then we went back to the drawing board and the committee agreed that we would actually make it the overall history of the Sanitation Districts. So that's what I did and Tom directed me. He told me that he would look into this and have someone give us information. This person was in the name of Corinne Clauson who is now Corinne Berenson. So I made two or three visits down. She's extremely attractive. I was_ by getting the information, I think she was very patient in all the time in which we spent. So she got together an awful lot of information, reports and data and maps and what have you. In addition to that after reviewing that we decided we really should go down and talk to Corinne further. Both Fred and I went down to speak to her. Also, she dug up a whole file of photographs, just album after album. We spent hours going through those and selecting various ones. We compiled those. In addition to this, Corinne also suggested a couple other people in the District which I might contact. The principal one was Bob Barletta. I made an appointment with him and went up to his home and spent a couple of hours sitting down with Bob. You probably know he's the former Maintenance Engineer, years ago and also ended up as being the General Manager of the County Sanitation Districts. I gleaned an awful lot of very interesting information. Incidentally, this study has been very fascinating to me so that is why I was very happy to carry on. He gave me names, history, times and events. He also said something which hadn't been mentioned before that I ought to study a very comprehensive report that was prepared in 1946 by a three man board of consultants, all of whom I had know and had dealings with in the past. One was Charles Gilman, at Berkley. Other gentlemen, lam Ron, General Manager of the Los Angeles Sanitation District and Franklin Thomas. So this was a real pleasure for me to read this report which was about three inches thick. I spent several hours through it and making a summary of this. My impression was that this was the basis of the design of your system. Also, one point I have forgotten to mention, is that ASCE does require that a project meet certain qualifications, which Fred has mentioned a little bit about. One of them is that it should be at least 50 years old and have some special engineering features. And others which after we delved into we discovered the District was well qualified. Number one, the District is over 82 years old, has a number of engineering features which are unique and provided for in our opinion the development of Orange County's being one of the leading counties in the nation as the need to dispose of its sewage. So these all met these requirement. So with that we proceeded. We were doing all the data and I prepared a text of this history of the District. I'm not sure if you all know that the District actually started in 1912 when the city of Santa Ana entered an agreement with 3 the Holly Sugar Company to design and build an outfall sewer into the ocean disposing for both of these facilities. That was the start of it. Another thing which I learned from Bob, which impressed Bob Barletta, he said that the development of this system was made up of dozens of extremely skilled, dedicated people, men and women. He said for this reason, this is why it became a success because of all you people, people in the past. Men and women who worked together. I have been told there were some fights and disputes among cities and districts down the line which maybe some of you know through your history, but it all came out in the wash. During these early times it was formed into seven districts, but I see now from your folders that you actually have 14 districts (correction from the audience -- 9 districts). It became a very successful project and we're very proud that we can name your District as a Historical Civil Engineering Landmark. Also I think I need to give credit to the people which I interviewed including, Corinne, Ray Lewis, one of your previous Chief Engineers, Tom Dawes and a number of other consultants such as Sid Lowery. I'm sure this is all repetition to you, but there were a lot of engineers and people that worked on this project including these people, Sid Lowery, Boyle Engineering, Ted Fenster and many engineers that worked within this district. Many of them are gone, have passed on. I think that's enough I can say. I'm very happy to be here and I'll pass this on to Fred. Fred Meier: OK. Thanks Jack. Now, we're pleased, the ASCE is pleased that we have Paul Taylor with us tonight. Paul is the president of the Los Angeles section of the American Society of Civil Engineers. In Orange County here, we have a branch. We're called the Orange County branch of the Los Angeles section. So now Paul, I'd like to turn this over to you for the presentation of the plaque. Paul Taylor: Thank you, Fred. These are the guys who did all the work and now my job is to do the ceremonial part. I think some of you know about that. On behalf of the 7,000 civil engineers and members of the American Society of Civil Engineers in Southern California, I'd like to summarize the five reasons why ASCE has seen fit to honor and award Civil Engineering Landmark status to the facilities and systems of the Orange County Sanitation Districts. First, is simply, that your 800 and some miles of system began over 80 years ago which is a remarkable achievement. Second, the timely construction and organizing of the Districts was an essential factor in the growth that Orange County has seen over the years. Third, the Districts and your technical personnel have met some very serious operations and maintenance challenges of which we engineers are proud that you have dealt with over the years. Fourth, the intensive, unique study design and difficult construction of the successful performing outfall sewer line has done a lot to maintain the health and environment in Orange County. Finally, the Districts process an awful lot of flow in a day - over 230 million gallons a day is a relatively high throughput for one of these systems. Chairman Cox, it's my honor and privilege to make this presentation to the Orange County Sanitation Districts. It says the Orange County Historic Civil Engineering Landmark, 4 American Society of Civil Engineers, Founded 1852, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Facilities and Systems, Initiated 1912, Designated 1994. Congratulations. JC: Thank you very much Fred and Paul. This is quite an honor for us. It's great to be recognized this way. Thank you very much again. Okay. On to upcoming meetings. Finance and Personnel Committee - Wednesday, November 16th, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Subcommittee - Tuesday, November 29th, at 5:30 p.m. Steering Committee- Wednesday, November 30th, at 4:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, November 30th, at 5:30 p.m. District 7 Selection Committee - Thursday, December 1 st, at 5:00 p.m. Planning, Design and Construction Committee - Thursday, December 1 at, at 5:30 p.m. Any questions) OK. With that, we will move on to the General Manager report. #6b - Report of General Manager BPA: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I'm happy to announce that the California Energy Commission has selected our treatment facilities as an energy efficient showcase for their Water Energy Efficiency program. The Districts were chosen among 52 applicants because of the Districts' current achievements and future plans for reducing energy costs and staff's commitment to energy management and willingness to share that experience with others in the industry. The California Energy Commission will be highlighting our program in articles placed in industrial trade journals. We expect that industry representatives will be touring our facilities to observe our operating practices. In the near future, the California Energy Commission representatives will assist us to document and further improve our energy savings efforts. In addition, we will become part of a water energy network to facilitate exchanges of information and experiences with other public and private agencies also attempting to manage their use of energy. We have one heads up for the Directors. That's going t ^provided by Margie Nellor. Margie. '1 MN: We wanted to give you a heads up on what's going on at our site in Thermal, California. It's not our site, but it's a site that was being used to recycle our biosolids. It was the site that was taking 75% of our biosolids. Over the past few weeks, the site has not been used because of an ongoing protest being conducted by members of the Torres- Martinez Tribe who have the property where the composting is going on. Green Peace and other activists. In the past week, there have been some more things happening on the part of the government. So it doesn't look like that site is going to be used in the foreseeable future. The government has filed a complaint and is seeking a petition for a temporary restraining order against the owners and operators of the site, but not the generators of the 5 biosolids, so that's good news. The complaint alleges that they are nuisances and that they are going to seek awards in relief for the tribe. The temporary restraining order sets forth some provisions that allows for the material that is still on the site that didn't get composted while the protesting was going on to be completed and removed for other materials to be removed and no new biosolids to be taken to the site. So right now all of our biosolids are going to Arizona and the cost is much higher than the Thermal site because of the transportation distance. We expect next week to be able to take those biosolids to Bakersfield and so the cast will come down. But the net result for the end of the year is going to be about $500,000 dollars more than if it had gone to Thermal for the rest of the year. We did budget in our budget for that kind of contingency, so even at the end of the year we will be within budget. We are actively looking for other contractors, hopefully in California so the cost will be lower. That matter was discussed at the November Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting. We'll keep you updated as things progress with the site. If you have any questions, I'd be glad to answer them. SPA: Thank you, Margie. Lastly, I'd like to direct your attention to a brochure that's been inserted into your packages tonight. This is an attempt of staff to improve our ability to communicate with the community that we impact during construction projects. This is a joint effort of our engineering department and public information. This is a model of what we will be doing in other parts of Orange County as we construct sewer projects. So you can expect something like this appearing at the doorways of the people within your communities when we are there. That concludes my report for tonight. JC: Thank you Blake. Tom, do you have anything to add? #6c - Report of General Counsel TLW: Just briefly, there will be an add on item for the closed session at the end and it relates to the memorandum that was put in the file for information only, but we need to update you on that. The only other thing is just one announcement as a follow up to this presentation there is a gentleman in the audience who retired from the Districts several years ago and the Directors have been here for a while after about 30 years of service for the District. Bill Clark, who was the District Superintendent, for all of these years for the Operation and Maintenance has joined us tonight. #7 - Minutes JC: OK, item number seven, the minutes. If there are no corrections or amendments, I will deem them approved as mailed. #8 - Payment of claims JC: And move to item number eight for a roll call vote on payment of claims, Penny. PK: The motion carries Mr. Chairman. 6 #13 - Supplement No. 3 to EIR JC: Item number thirteen. This we need a staff report. Blake are you going to kick this off? BPA: Yes, Mr. Chairman, the Director of Engineering, John Linder, will provide a report. JL: A) Mr. Chairman, Directors and Blake, this item concerns the reconstruction of s tower number one on the older 78" outfall line at Plant 2 which is part of Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades. That is our job number J-34-1 which is under design. This search tower is depicted in your package in the staff report between pages nine and ten. If you care to look at what that looks like. The seismic studies indicate the need to replace the old search tower to one on a pile foundation and located 400 feet further south of the existing search tower. This moves the search tower off of the Newport / Inglewood fault line and this is where the geologists report that a fracture could occur if we had a severe earthquake in that area. In August, the Directors authorized the preparation circulation of draft Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report. The draft supplement was sent to local, regional and state agencies. We received two comments. Those were incorporated in the current draft Supplement No. 3 dated October of 1994 which is in the package tonight. The final supplement will incorporate any other comments received until December 31, 1994. B) The recommended actions this evening are to receive and file comments received on the Notice of Preparation of Supplement No. 3 to the 1989 Program Environmental Impact report. C) - F) Motions JC: Any questions for staff? This is a motion for b, c, d, a and I. I have a second. Is there any discussion? Any opposition? We'll consider that unanimous. 814- Closed Session JC: Move on to item number fourteen and we will have a closed session as Tom announced before. TLW: Yes, the published agenda has three items listed. I would direct to your attention and request the Boards' consideration to add an item that has just come to the attention on Monday relative to a matter of pending litigation. That relates to litigation surrounding the fire accident on Job P2-49 at Plant No. 2. It is essential, I believe, for the Boards to review it at this time in view of the fact that the litigation was filed and action by the Districts will be required probably prior to the next Board meeting. JC: We do ask that the room be cleared with everybody but Board members before we ... 7 #28- Waiving of Connection Fees JC: If we could move to item number 28, if you beg my indulgence to bring this forward because it is an important issue that impacts all the Districts. Blake, do you want to introduce this item. BPA: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. This issue before you is the waiving of connection fees for the proposed Federal Courthouse in Santa Ana. The Director of Engineering, John Linder, will provide a brief overview of the project or issue. JL: Mr. Chairman, Directors, this item was brought to the Directors last month following a brief discussion it was moved and seconded that that request be respectfully denied. It was then noted that the City of Santa Ana Directors were not present. A substitute motion was then carried to continue the item until this meeting. District No. 1 has been requested to waive the sewer connection fees for a new Federal Courthouse in Santa Ana. The connection fees would be $245, 913.40 for this facility which is 523,220 square feet. These figures have been adjusted a little bit since the last meeting so it's slightly higher than reported last meeting. Blake, you may want some more information on that from another staff person. BPA: Right, Tom, can you lay out the issue of how this ties into the connection ordinance. TLW: Yes. As we've noted previously on here. The request is to waive it and there are 7 no provisions in this District 1 Ordinance or any other Districts Ordinances for a waiver, per X Se What it would require procedurally, is if the Directors choose to make a provision to not charge this, we would have to conduct the hearing and do an amendment to the Ordinance to provide that the Federal Facilities are not required to pay the connection fees. There is just no provision to just waive it by a motion. Director Pickier. Iry Pickier: Yes. I have a question. Jim Potts: JC: Pat, do you want to speak to this item. We waited for you to talk on it. Pat McGuigan: Yes and I appreciate the opportunity Sol would respectfully request that we a motion JC: OK. That's a motion? PM: Yes sir. JC: Is there a second? OK, discussion? Bill William Steiner: TLW: The local government agencies are exempt. 8 WS: TLW: That's correct. The local governments and everybody pays the user charges under that ordinance. That's the monthly service charge or the annual service charge. JC: OK. Roger, did you have your hand up? Roger Stanton: TLW: The reason it goes back is because the local governments are the member entities here of the agency. The state is not exempt either. JC: John. John Collins: Is there any out of pocket costs 7 JC: In theory, they are not paying their fair share of the plan. John Collins: JC: The rest of us. John Collins: Well, that is my question. JC: Right. Peer. Peer Swan: This is recently An alternative way of doing it is to say that we will give you a ten year and have them pay it Pat McGuigan: PS: John Collins: PM: JC: Well, I think Peer is proposing an option that if it is a financial constraint, which you've said before Pat, in getting the building done that option would be for the District to loan the money over a ten year period of time and get paid back. PM: PS: But it would be just JC: Roger. 9 Roger Stanton: PM: JC: Well, because it impacts the rest of the District, it's costing us. That's why I thought everybody ought to be aware of it. RS: (Something about cost??) Peer Swan: The connection fee is based on the square footage of the building and it is in line with...and it is the theoretical cost of the treatment facilities to handle the sewage that will come from the building. RS: JC: OK. We have a call for the question. All those in favor, raise your hands so we can see. It is only District 1. Those voting are Fred Barrera, Pat McGuigan, Jim Ferryman, Roger Stanton and Tom Saltarelli. They are voting on... Iry Pickler??: Let me ask a question. TLW: Well, comment, I think Gary can talk about the dollars, but there is some misinterpretation here. The fees, each District has their own budget for Capital Facilities and that is including a share of the Joint Facilities. So, the fees will have to be reallocated within District 1. The actual extra cost to the other Districts won't be realized as it will be within District 1. On the other hand, the figure is not arbitrary either. Gary can address this. We have to do a calculation based upon the projected capital outlays over a period of years, what it is going to cost and what everyone has to gather in terms of fees to pay for it including connection charges, the bonding, etc. The number has been arbitrated.. RS: TLW: No, Gary maybe, but Gary can articulate it better than. Roger: It is not like I come in to your hotel and use Gary Streed: That's correct. The fee is calculated by taking the estimated cost of the future facilities or those facilities to be built to the year 2020 and dividing that by the number of facilities that are going to built between now and 2020. That is how the fee is determined. It is a proration of the capital cost to new construction. JC: OK. We have the motion on the floor and it is item C2, consideration of a motion fixing December 14th, at 7:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Office, as the date and place for the public hearing to amend Ordinance No. 119. That is the motion. Is that correct, Pat? PM: May I clarify one thing? This Ordinance only relates to District 1. 10 TLW: That is correct. JC: OK. Was there any other question about this? Alright, all in favor. I see all of you favor. Motion passes. OK. With that, we can get rid of some of you. One question Peer asked me, any of you that are interested in serving on the Computer Committee for the Finance Department that we are going through this review. Some people have signed up, but there is not enough. We would like to have more. So would you Peer know if you are interested because you have some kind of computer... ??: If I could see your hand if you have got some background in accounting and computers. I would like to add you on. Anyone. JC: OK. Let me go through the Districts. District 2, is there any other business, communication or supplemental agenda items? Norman Eckenrode: I have one question, if I may. Is there employee vacation policy being reviewed by ? JC: Finance and Personnel Committee, yes. NE: PS: It is on the agenda for the next Finance and Personnel Committee meeting which is next week. JC: OK. Alright now, District 3, Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering's staff report. Blake. N31 - Professional Services Acreement with Boyle Encineerinc EPA: Mr. Linder? JL: Mr. Chairman and Directors of District 3, this item concerns a replacement of deficient trunk sewers along the Miller-Holder Sewer System in District 3. These deficiencies are identified in the 1989 master plan. The old pipe ranges in sizes from 15" to 27". The new system would be in the range from 21" to 42" in diameter with an estimated construction cost between $8.8 million and $10.4 million. The reason we want to proceed with this design with construction as soon as possible is to stay ahead of street improvements as requested by Cal-Trans and the City of La Habra. This came to our attention in the past, but we weren't scheduled to start this design until probably, I think, two years from now. With this new information, we wanted to get ahead of the street construction in that area on Beach. One of the recommendations that we have tonight is to split the project into three reaches 11 so that we can construct the one reach that will be in front of the construction on Beach Boulevard. This first project, which will be reach two, that we would like to complete the design first, is to be completed before the street project which is about the Fall of 1995. So we want to be under construction, if possible, in the late Spring or at least during the Summer of 1995. Also, we want to point out that there are three alternatives for the alignment in reach number one of this project. We recommend in this staff report that alternate number one along the existing alignment be used. Mainly that is due to less maintenance cost on this alignment versus the other two alignments. Each of these alignments have siphons in them; however, two of the alignments that we would rather not use have two extra siphons and that creates a lot of extra maintenance work. The sewer system described is based on a two pipe system and if we up-size the new pipe we could essentially take the older pipe out of service and thereby reduce our liability and maintenance cost and repairs to manholes which are required in about five years. We would not abandon that line, but we would only use that for reserve or emergencies. I have got a couple diagrams here, or exhibits. JC: Don, you had a question? Don Griffin: Yes. JL: JC: George? George Brown: JL: JC: John? John Collins: This is in the budget JC: Jim? Jim Flora: JC: OK. We have a motion from Irv. Question? Let me get a second and then we will have discussion. OK. Sal? Sal Sapien: John, JL: JC: OK. Any other questions in this discussion? I have a motion and a second. Any opposition? Alright, we will consider that unanimous. Districts Nos. 5 & 6, we have a 12 replacement of Coast Highway Gravity Sewers. Staff report please. #34- Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer. Phase 3 BPA: Mr. Linder? Iry Pickier: JC: Yes, Irv, you can take your plaque. John. JL: This item concerns the replacement of an old 27" and 30" clay line which was built in 1936. This is being replaced with a new clay pipeline which varies in size from 30" to 36" and it runs along Pacific Coast Highway between the arches and bitter point pump station which is very near restaurant. This is the last of phase of replacing that old line we call the 401 line down Pacific Coast Highway. In fact, this is the line that last spring we had trouble with the methane getting into that line. So, this is a replacement of that line. Also included in the contract will be work for the City of Newport Beach under reimbursement agreement. We are doing some sewer work for them that will be hooked into our line right at Superior. The Directors previously approved the plans and specifications for this Contract No. 5-37-3, in September. The recommended actions this evening are to approve Addendum No. 1 which deals with the possible gasoline contamination of dirt in the vicinity of Superior and Pacific Coast Highway. That Addendum we felt was necessary because we did recall that were some gas stations in that area, or at least one, and we suspect we may hit some contamination as we have done before. So, that is what that Addendum covers. The second action is to award the contract to Wal-Con Construction Company, the low responsible bidder at $1,985,000.00. There were ten bids received on the 13th of October, ranging from a high of $3,296,866.00to this low figure of $1,985,000.00. That Concludes my report. JC: Questions? Jan? Jan Debay: JL: Since I have been here they have not, although they have been a bidder on many projects. However, we have received information that they are a good contractor and we have no reason to believe that they won't do a good job for us. Jan Debay: (Price is so low.) JL: Well, on the backside of the report, if you will flip that clear over to the backside, you can see the range of the bids and most of them are in the $2,000,000range which they are just under what most of them are, but very close. JD: Do you have the dates 13 JL: We suspect that the construction will not start until after the first of the year. JC: OK. Any other questions? Evelyn. Evelyn Hart: JL: We certainly will. The way that the bid schedule is set up, that is an additive. Those are bid items that we don't have to pay if we don't run into the work. They are already established. Jan Debay: (One more question.) JL: We will coordinate our activities with everybody and all the utilities. I don't know if they are on our list for JC: OK. Could we have a motion then? Second? OK. Any opposition? We will consider that unanimous. With that we are all adjourned. TLW: One more thing, if I may. Just one announcement, the Boards of Directors during the closed session did take action relative to a personnel item and has appointed Ms. Penny Kyle as Board Secretary effective this date. Peer Swan: Penny, would you introduce your new assistant? PK: This is Petra Tyndall. JC: OK. Thank you all. 14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14 w OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES JOINT BOARD MEETING NOVEMBER 9, 1994 �`oPQ\gIRICTS OF099y c y I. y Z j J a THE ENS\PPP�� ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2,3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Dump.County,California,was held an November 9, 1994,at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the tell was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1,2,3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTNE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS e DISTRICT NO.1: L Fred Barron.Chair Gene Beyer James M.Fenyman,Chair pro tam Nate Reade -xv Pat McGuigan Thomas E. Lou x Roper Stamon William G.Steiner Tracy A.Worley Thomas R.Solecism DISTRCT NO.2: John Collins,Chair George Scott lw Rcklm,Chair tin ram Tom Daly ,Jt Fred Barrels Gene Beyer Chris Norby Barry Danes Bob Beg Norman Z.Eclumods Michael MawKweiler 3_ William D.Mahoney James H. Flora Cerny J.Nelson Glenn Parker Miguel Pli ido 3_ Thomas E.Lou Roger Stanton William G.Shirker Daniel T.Welch John M.Gullixsan George L.2Nkat Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO.3: X_ Sal A.Senate,Chair William C.Estrada Bumie Domain.Chair pre tam Caney J.Nelson gyp_ George Brown Frank Laszlo _ Chris Norby • John Collins _ George Scott • James H.Flom _ William 0.Mahoney Don R.Griffin Donald Bone • Wally Lou _ Eva G.Miner • Thomas E.Lou _ Pat McGuigan Linda MoultomPanerson Earle Rabinllle Richard!Partin Joyce C.Nicholson Iry Rome, _ Tom Daly x Margie L.Rice James V.Evans Sheldon Singer George L.boxer x Roger Sermon William G.Steiner Charles Sylvia Amhara Selvaggi DISTRICT NO.5: Jan Delay.Chair PNI Sansone x William G.Steiner,Chair pre tam Roger Suntan John C.Cox,Jr. Jan Debay DISTRICT NO.6: James A.Wanner,Chair Annul Ferry Evelyn Hart.Chair pro tam John C.Cox,Jr. William G.Steiner Roger Stamen DISTRICT NO.7: Burry Hammond.Chair Mike Wartl x Thomas R.Stimuli,Chair pro rem Jim Potts Fred Barren Gene Beyer x Ted Moreno Miguel Pulice Phil Samom Jan Debay X William G.Steiner Roger Stanton James A.Wanner Mike Schaefer DISTRICT NO. 11: Grace Wnchi Chair Earle RoSitaille x Victor Leipeig, Chair We tam Linda MpulternFatten rn Roger Stanon William G.Steiner f DISTRICT NO.13: John M.GWlixten, Chair x Daniel T.Welch a Glenn Parker,Chair pm tam Burnie Dumep Fretl Barton Go.Beyer Iry Roder Tom Daly . William G.Steiner Roper Stanton DISTRICT NO.14: . Peer A.Swan.Chair Darryl Miller Be"Hammond,Chair pro tam _ Mike Word Fred Barren _ Gene Beyer Jim Fors Tracy A.Worley William G.Steiner _ Fear,Stanton -2- 11/09/94 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Blake P. Anderson, General Manager, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Corinne Berenson, Catherine Biele, Laurie Bluestein, Mike Broyles, Don Crapnell, 4 John Finias, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Mike Moore, Margie Nellor, Bob Ooten, Ellen Ray, Gary Streed, Petra Tyndall, Mike White, Chuck Winsor, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, William N. Clark, Jamel Demir, John B. Howe, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Fred J. Meier, Phil Stone, Paul Taylor DISTRICT 13 In the absence of Chair John Gullixson and Chair Appointment of Chair Pro tern pro tem Glenn Parker, Director Fred Barrere was appointed Chair pro tem of District No. 13. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair announced that General Manager Adoption of resolution of appreciation for J. Wayne Sylvester was retiring from the Districts. retiring General Manager He then introduced a resolution expressing the J. Wayne Sylvester Boards'appreciation to General Manager J. Wayne Sylvester. It was then moved, seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-134, expressing appreciation to retiring General Manager J. Wayne Sylvester for his outstanding contributions and dedication to public service. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair announced that ten of the Board Adoption of resolutions of appreciation members were retiring from the Board. He then for retiring Directors introduced resolutions expressing the Boards' appreciation to these Directors. It was then moved, seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions expressing appreciation to the retiring Directors for their outstanding contributions and dedication to public service: -3- 11/09/94 Resolution No. Director City/Agenw District 94-135 A.B. "Buck" Catlin Fullerton 2 & 3 94-136 Iry Pickier Anaheim 2, 3 & 13 94-137 Carrey J. Nelson Brea 2 94-138 Richard Partin Cypress 3 94-139 Linda Moulton-Patterson Huntington Beach 3 94-140 Grace Winchell Huntington Beach 11 94-141 William D. Mahoney La Habra 2 94-142 Evelyn Hart Newport Beach 6 94-143 Phil Sansone Newport Beach 7 94-144 James A. Wahner Costa Mesa 6 & 7 Sanitary District Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. Joint Chair Cox stated that the resolutions would be formally presented to each of these Directors at a later date. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair reported that the American Society Presentation by American Society of Civil of Civil Engineers (ASCE) had been working with Engineers re Recognition of Districts as an the Districts' public information office for Historic Civil Engineering Project approximately two years assembling a history report and pictures of the Districts in order to designate the Districts as an historical civil engineering project. Joint Chair Cox then introduced Fred Meier, Chairman of the Orange County Branch of the History and Heritage Committee. Mr. Meier summarized ASCE requirements in order to be designated an historical project and reviewed the Districts' history. He then introduced John B. Howe, who assisted in assembling the history report . Mr. Howe gave a brief report on the Districts' history, and mentioned that the Districts originally began in 1912 when the City of Santa Ana entered into an agreement with the Holly Sugar Company to design and build an outfall sewer into the ocean for disposal. Paul Taylor, President of the Los Angeles branch of ASCE,was also recognized. He stated there were five reasons for the awarding of civil engineering landmark status to the facilities and systems of the Districts: 800+ miles of system which began over 80 years ago; timely construction and organization of the Districts; Districts and technical personnel meeting serious operations and maintenance challenges in a way of which engineers can be proud; intensive, unique study design and difficult construction of the ocean outfall in 1971; and processing of 230+ million gallons per day throughout the system. A bronze plaque was then presented to the Districts declaring the Districts as an Orange County Historic Civil Engineering Landmark by the American Society of Civil Engineers. -4- 11/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair announced the tentatively Report of the Joint Chair scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Finance and Personnel Committee- Wednesday, November 16th, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Subcommittee -Tuesday, November 29th, at 5:30 p.m. Steering Committee- Wednesday, November 30th, at 4:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, November 30th, at 5:30 p.m. District 7 Selection Committee -Thursday, December 1st, at 5:00 p.m. Planning, Design and Construction Committee - Thursday, December 1st, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that the California Report of the General Manager Energy Commission selected the Districts' treatment facilities as an energy efficient showcase for their Water Energy Efficiency program. The Districts were chosen among 52 applicants because of the Districts' current achievements and future plans for reducing energy costs, staffs commitment to energy management and willingness to share that experience with others in the industry. The California Energy Commission will be highlighting the Districts' program in articles placed in industrial trade journals. It is expected that industry representatives will be touring Districts' facilities to observe our operating practices. Mr. Anderson further reported that in the near future, the California Energy Commission representatives will assist staff in documenting to further improve our energy savings efforts. In addition, the Districts will become part of a water energy network to facilitate exchanges of information and experiences with other public and private agencies also attempting to manage their use of energy. The General Manager then requested that Margie Nellor, Director of Technical Services, update the Directors relative to the biosolids issue in Thermal, California. Ms. Nellor reported that 75% of the Districts' biosolids were formerly trucked to the site in Thermal in full accordance with all EPA guidelines and without impacting ground water resources as demonstrated by direct testing of the water by EPA. Over the past few weeks the site has not been used because of an ongoing protest conducted by a minority of the members of the Torres-Martinez Tribe, Green Peace and other activists. Ms. Nellor noted that the property owner, the majority of the tribe members and EPA do not oppose the use of the site for composting biosolids. Nevertheless, the government has filed a complaint and is seeking a petition for a temporary restraining order against the owners and operators of the site, but not the generators of the biosolids. Ms. Nellor further reported the complaint alleges that they are nuisances and they will seek awards in relief for the tribe. The temporary restraining order sets forth provisions that allows for the material still on the site that didn't get composted while the protesting was going on to be completed and removed. Ms. Nellor then stated that all of the Districts' biosolids are going to Arizona, and the cost is much higher than the Thermal site because of the transportation distance. Staff is expecting to - be able to take the biosolids to Bakersfield in the very near future, thus bringing the costs down. The net result, however, is that by the end-of-the-year we may experience about $500,000 -5- 11/09/94 more in costs than if the biosolids had gone to Thermal for the rest of the year. Staff did budget for the possibility of this type of contingency, so we should remain within budget. Ms. Nellor further reported that other contractors were being looked at and that this matter was discussed at the Operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Committee meeting in November. The General Manager then reported that a brochure had been included in the Directors' meeting folders that evening regarding improving the Districts' ability to communicate with the community that we impact during construction projects. This brochure was compiled as a joint effort between the engineering department and public information. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meetings held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -6- 11/09/94 DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments to the Approval of Minutes minutes of the regular meeting held October 12, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of Payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages"A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 10/05/94 10/19/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $637,371.26 $737,548.19 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,670,621.89 157,598.43 Joint Working Capital Fund - 162,603.04 147.479.26 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 53,693.92 60,649.18 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 0.00 7,121.93 DISTRICT NO, 2 - 572,169.86 40,084.94 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 75,646.96 75,522.64 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 8,332.15 12.653.31 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 24,859.82 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 5,174.66 14,655.12 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 16,207.81 172.888.86 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 101.63 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 24,888.79 1,059,665.09 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 &6 JOINT - 7,410.94 1,958.30 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2.838.39 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 84. 61.93 691,17 $3.241.821.60 $2.513.477.87 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving extension of completion date re Collaborative National Study Using That the staff report dated November 2, 1994, be, Molecular Techniques to Detect and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, Hepatitis A Virus and Virulence Factor Genes in E. Colt (Project No. HR-92-0 FURTHER MOVED: That the completion date for With NWRI. UNC and HWRRC the Collaborative National Study Using Molecular Techniques to Detect Hepatitis A Virus and Virulence Factor Genes in E. Colt (Project No. HR-92-06) with National Water Research Institute (NWRI), University of North Carolina (UNC) and Hawaii Water Resources Research Center (HWRRC), be, and is hereby extended, from June 30, 1994 to February 28, 1995, with no change in the grant funding amount of$888,111.00. -7- 11/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizino settlement of Workers' Compensation claim for former employee That the settlement of Workers' Compensation Peggv Rupp claim for former employee, Peggy Rupp, in the amount of$22,000.00, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing settlement of Workers' Compensation claim for emplovee That the settlement of Workers' Compensation John Soto claim for employee, John Soto, in the amount of $20,000.00, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Operations Committee That the draft minutes of the Operations Committee meeting held on October 5, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered fled. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Engineering and Construction Committee That the draft minutes of the Engineering and Construction Committee meeting held on October 6, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Subcommittee That the draft minutes of the Executive Subcommittee meeting held on October 14, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Finance and Personnel Committee That the draft minutes of the Finance and Personnel Committee meeting held on October 19, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Special Executive Search Committee That the draft minutes of the Special Executive Search Committee meeting held on October 26, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on October 26, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -8- 11/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate Agreement with Holmes & Narver. Inc. Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services for design and construction services re Agreement with Holmes & Narver, Inc. for design Job Nos. Pl-44 and P2-53 and construction services required for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44, and - Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53, providing for additional design and construction support services, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to negotiate Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to negotiate Agreement with John Carollo Engineers Addendum No. 4 to the Professional Services for design, construction support services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design, and preparation of operation and construction support services and preparation of maintenance manuals re Job Nos. P1-38 operation and maintenance manuals for ands-43 Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-43, providing for additional construction support services, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Engineering and Construction Committee Boyle Engineering Corporation re certification of the final negotiated fee relative to Job No. Pl-41 and Job No. P2-48 Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for additional studies, preparation of plans and specifications and construction support services for Rehabilitation of Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P141, and Rehabilitation of Clarifiers D through O at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.48, providing for additional design and software programming services, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-131, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said additional services, on an hourly rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit for an additional amount not to exceed $67,198.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $482,210.00 to an amount not to exceed $549,408.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -9- 11/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the Plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Nos. P1-36-1. P1-38.1. P1-38-4 and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at P2-43-3 Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-1, Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-1, Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pi-38-4, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-3, authorizing an addition of$26,350.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc., Division of Zum Constructors, Inc., for four items of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $6,049,864.00 to an amount not to exceed $6,076,214.00, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and No. P2-43-1 specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-43-1, authorizing an addition of$25,000.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for one item of additional work, Increasing the total authorized amount from $3,303,553.00 to an amount not to exceed $3,328,553.00, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 5 to the Plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and No. P2-42-2 specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P242-2, authorizing an addition of$22,039.00 to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for three items of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $14,319,852.00 to an amount not to exceed $14,341,891.00, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoorovina Chanae Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2), authorizing a net addition of$38,854.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. for three items of additional work, increasing the total authorized amount from $2,321,798.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,360,652.00, and granting a time extension of 19 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive_ file and approve Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Prepared by staff That the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and KPMG Peat Marwick, Certified Public prepared by staff and KPMG Peat Marwick, Accountants Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1994, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -10- 11/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Supplement No. 3 to the Prooram Environmental Impact Reoort for the 1989 Collection. Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Job No. J-34-1 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that in August the Directors authorized the preparation and circulation of Draft Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection,Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1. The draft supplement was sent to local, regional and state agencies. Two comments were received and incorporated in Draft Supplement No. 3 dated October 1994. Mr. Linder further stated that any additional comments received through the final date of December 31, 1994 will be incorporated into the final supplement. Receive and file comments received Moved, seconded and duly carried: on the Notice of Preparation of Supplement No. 3 That the comments received on the Notice of Preparation of Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Staff Report and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Draft Suoolement No. 3 to EIR That the Staff Report dated October 13, 1994 and Draft Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizino General Manager to file Moved, seconded and duly carried: a Notice of Completion of Draft Supplement No. 3 to EIR That the General Manger, be, and is hereby, authorized to file a Notice of Completion of Draft Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Ocean Ouffall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1. Fixing the date, time and Place for Moved, seconded and duly carried: Public Hearino re Draft Supplement No. 3 to EIR That the Public Hearing for the Draft Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Ocean = Ouffall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1, be, and is hereby, set for Wednesday, December 14, 1994 at 7:30 p.m., at the Districts'Administrative Office. _11_ 11/09/94 Establishing the final dale for That December 31, 1994, be, and is hereby, comments to be received on Draft established as the final date for which all comments Supplement No. 3 to EIR must be received on Draft Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors the need General Counsel's Comments Prior to for a dosed session as authorized by Government Closed Session Code Section 54956.9, 54957 and 54957.6 to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Item 14(b)(1)(b), (2) and (3) on the published Agenda. General Counsel also indicated a need to add one item needing immediate action that arose subsequent to the publication of the agenda. He reported that additional items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two-thirds vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Add Items to the Closed Session Agenda That new pending litigation entitled Andy C. Patterson, at al. vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 738179, relating to the fire accident on Job No. P2-49 at Plant No. 2, be added to the Agenda for discussion and action. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9. The Boards convened in closed session at 54957 and 54957.6 8:08 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9, 54957 and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of actions taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re: Agenda Item 14(b)(3). No actions were taken re: Agenda Items 14(b)(1)(b) and 14(b)(2). ALL DISTRICTS At 8:25 p.m. the Boards reconvened in regular Reconvene in regular session session. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Appointing Penny Kyle as Board Secretary re Agenda Item 14(b)(3) That the Boards of Directors hereby appoint Penny Kyle as Board Secretary of the Joint Boards of Directors. -12- 11/09194 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizino Executive Committee to select and retain Special Counsel upon receipt of That the Boards of Directors hereby authorize the Summons and Complaint re Richard Holm. Executive Committee to select and retain Special Lacey Miller, a minor, through her Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Guardian Ad Litem. Georgianne I. Miller. Districts. Andy C. Patterson and Jackie J. Venezio _ (Patterson) re Agenda Item 14(b)(4) DISTRICT 1 Actions pertaining to request of the City of Santa Ana for waiver of capital facilities connection charges for Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that the request of the City of Santa Ana for waiver of capital facilities connection charges for the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse was brought before the Board of Directors last month. After a brief discussion, it was moved that the request be respectfully denied. It was then noted that the Director representing the City of Santa Ana was not present. A substitute motion was then made to continue the item to the next meeting. Mr. Linder summarized the City of Santa Ana's request to waive the $231,475.00 capital facilities connection charges for the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse. He reported that the fees have been adjusted slightly upwards to $245,913.40 based on a new building size estimate of 523,220 square feet. General Counsel then reported that there are no provisions within the Ordinance to waive any fees for federal facilities. A public hearing would need to be conducted for an amendment to the Ordinance to waive the connection fees for federal facilities in general or the federal courthouse, specifically. Following a brief discussion among the Directors, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the request of the City of Santa Ana to waive the $245,913.40 capital facilities connection charges for Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse in Santa Ana, between West Fourth and Fifth Streets and Broadway and Ross Avenues, be, and is hereby, the subject of a public hearing scheduled for December 14, 1994 to consider an amendment to Ordinance No. 119 Establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations, waiving connection fees for the Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:37 p.m. -13- 11/09/94 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:37 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Actions re Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, Contract No. 3-38 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that the preparation of a project report, design and construction support services required for Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Contract No. 3-38, is for the replacement of deficient trunk sewers along the Miller-Holder Sewer System. These deficiencies were identified in the 1989 Master Plan. The old pipe ranges in sizes from 15 inches to 27 inches, and the new system would be in the range of 21 inches to 42 inches in diameter, with an estimated construction cost between $8.8 million and $10.4 million. It was further reported that the need to proceed quickly with this design and construction is to stay ahead of street improvements as requested by Cal-Trans and the City of La Habra. Originally, this project was not scheduled for design for a few more years. However, since staff has been informed of the street construction in that area on Beach Boulevard, it is important to speed up this design and construction. Mr. Linder further stated that one of the recommendations is to split the project into three reaches so that the one reach that will be in front of the construction on Beach Boulevard. The first project, which will be Reach 2, is to be completed before the street project begins, which is around the fall of 1995, so staff would like to be under construction in the late spring or early summer of 1995. The Director of Engineering also pointed out that there are three alternatives for the alignment in Reach 1, and staff recommended that Alternate No. 1 along the existing alignment be used primarily due to less maintenance cost on this alignment vs. the other two alignments. Each of these alignments have siphons in them. The two alignments that staff does not recommend have two extra siphons each, which will create extra maintenance work and reduce long-term reliability. It was further reported that the sewer system described is based on a two-pipe system, and if the new pipe is up-sized then the older pipe could be taken out of service, thereby reducing liability and maintenance cost and repairs to manholes which will be required in about five years. The line would not be abandoned, but be only used for reserve or emergencies. Receive and file Protect Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: Prepare d by Boyle Engineering Corporation That the Project Report prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation, be, and is hereby, received and ordered fled. -14- 11/09/94 Directing Staff and Boyle Moved, seconded and duly carried: Engineering Corporation to proceed with preparation of the plans and That staff and Boyle Engineering Corporation, be, specifications for Alternative No. 1 and are hereby, directed to proceed with re Contract No. 3-38 preparation of the plans and specifications for Alternative No. 1, dividing Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Contract No. 3-38, into three separate projects, Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 1 (Rostrata Avenue to 5,800 feet North of Rosecrans Avenue), Contract No. 3-38-1; Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 2 (5,800 feet North of Rosecrans Avenue to Imperial Highway), Contract No. 3-33-2; and Improvements to Miller-Holder Sewer System, Reach 3 (Beach Boulevard to Harbor Boulevard), Contract No. 3-38-3. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Actions re Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravilv Sewer, Phase 3. Contract No. 5.37-3 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that the plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3,was approved in September. This project is the replacement of a 27-inch and 30-inch clay line which was built in 1936. This line is being replaced with a new clay pipeline which varies in size from 30 inches to 36 inches, and runs along Pacific Coast Highway between the Arches and Bitter Point Pump Station. He further reported that this is the last phase of replacing the line along Pacific Coast Highway. Mr. Linder advised that a reimbursement agreement had been approved with the City of Newport Beach for sewer improvements. He then stated that on October 13, 1994, ten bids were received for this project. The bids ranged from a high of$3,296,866.00 to a low of$1,985,000.00, submitted by Wal-Con Construction Company, and recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. The engineer's estimate was $2.2 million. After a brief discussion, the Directors approved the following two items. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, changing the date for receipt of bids from October 11, 1994 to October 13, 1994, and making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. -15- 11/09194 Receiving and filing bid tabulation Moved, seconded and duly carried: and recommendation and awardino contract to Wal-Con Construction That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Company Resolution No. 94-132, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5.37-3, to Wal-Con Construction Company, in the total amount of$1,985,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Summons and Cross- Complaint 21 st Century Casualty That the Summons and Cross-Complaint entitled Company vs. State of California. State of 21 st Century Casually Company vs. State of California vs. County Sanitation District California, State of California vs. County Sanitation No. 5 and Anaheim Sewer Construction, District No. 5 and Anaheim Sewer Construction, Orange County Municipal Court Case Orange County Municipal Court Case No, 94-C-2083 No. 94.62083, seeking recovery for alleged property damage, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel, be, and is hereby, authorized to seek and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:52 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adloumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:52 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 139-Garr Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-133-7, ordering annexation of 1.599 acres of territory to the District, in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of Ranchwood Trail and Amapola Avenue in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 139-Garr Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:37 p.m. -16- 11/09/94 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:37 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: . Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:37 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A_diournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Secretary of o s of Directors of County S atio istricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 _17_ FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9129194 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IMSM4 POSTING DATE 101050M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140441 AG TECH COMPANY $61,734.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 140442 AT&T-PROWATTS $4.308.41 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 14W43 AT&T-MEGACOM SERVICE $971,46 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 140444 AT&T-CELLULAR CR&R $2,02 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 140445 ABRASIVE ENO.,TOOL&EQUIP $431.82 PAINT SUPPLIES 140446 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS $473.116.08 CONSTRUCTION P1-38-1 140447 AIR CLEANING SPECIALISTS $641.33 ELECTRIC PARTS 140448 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $17.705.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89 140449 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $928.09 CONSTRUCTION P2-53-1 140450 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $546.46 BUILDING MATERIALS 140451 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $330.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 14M52 APCO VALVE PRIMER CORP. $1,644.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140453 ADS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $1,374,89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 14D454 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $843.51 INSTRUMENT 14USS ARMOR-VAC $702.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES fT1 140055 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. fl64.87 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES X 140457 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE.INC. $1.128,80 WASTE REMOVAL 140458 ASSOCIATED VACUUM TECH.,INC. 8582.94 FITRNGS LD 140459 AWARDS&TROPHIES $34,26 PLAQUES 140460 BKK LANDFILL $3,072.48 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.D.10-9.91 140461 BRW SAFETY&SUPPLY $728.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES n 140062 BATTERY SPECALTIES $639.80 BATTERIES 14M63 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. &4,555.09 LAB SUPPLIES 140461 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $589.75 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 140465 BELLCO GLASS,INC. &184.41 LAB SUPPLIES 140466 BELL SECURITY $1.682.64 SECURITY SERVICES 140467 BENTLY NEVADA $349.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140468 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $1.144.28 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140089 DAVID BIHL 313.D00.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 140470 BID TECH NET,INC. $8.33 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140071 BLACK&VEATCH &3,652.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-25.1 140472 BLOOMBERG LP. $4,832.69 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.O.4-14.93 14D473 BORNEMANN PUMPS,INC. $240.27 PUMP PARTS 140474 80YLE ENGINEERING CORP. $40.433.78 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pidl 14D475 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $321.56 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140476 BNI BOOKS &134A9 TECHNICAL BOOKS 140477 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. &194.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 14W78 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $7.436.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.SA94 14D479 BUY-CHEM DISTRIBUTORS $1,62961 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140450 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720,00 GAS ANALYSIS SERVICES 140481 C.P.I. $969,29 LAB SUPPLIES 140482 CS COMPANY $6.119.12 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140483 CAD VENTURES $969.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES 140484 CALTROL,INC. $395.0 REGULATOR PARTS 140485 CARLETON ENGINEERS $782.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 140488 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $60,605.03 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-34 FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 929194 PAGE02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/05/94 POSTING DATE 10105M WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140487 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $420.23 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140488 LORETTA L.COFFMAN $137.92 PUBLICATION 140489 COUCH&SONS E561,27240 CONSTRUCTION 2-9-R1 1411490 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 54,590.05 HARDWARE 140491 COMPUSA,INC. $524.63 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 140492 COMPUSERVE $207.23 .COMPUTER SERVICES 140493 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $15.51 TRUCK PARTS 140 N CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $05.92 ELECTRIC PARTS 140495 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS 5147.44 FREIGHT 14N96 CONSTRUCTION FABRICATORS,INC. $13.309.28 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140497 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. 5254.34 TOOLS 140498 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $2,602.16 CHLORINE M.O.10-11.93 140499 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $2,596.08 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8-11-93 140500 CONVEYOR COMPONENTS CO. $3,09075 ELECTRIC PARTS T71 140501 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $89.715.10 ENGINESIENGINE PARTS M.O.8-8-88 >< 140502 COSTAR CORP. $10775 LAB SUPPLIES = 140503 COUNTERPART ENTERPRISES $1,32522 COMPRESSOR PARTS m 140504 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.33772 ELECTRIC PARTS 140505 CURRENT PROTOCOLS 6371.W SUBSCRIPTION 140508 ONE,INC. $2.695.51 PLUMBING SUPPLIES D 140507 D.T.I. $60.00 CHEMICALS I 140508 J.W.O•ANGELO CO.,INC. $566.05 BUILDING MATERIALS N 140509 DUALS SALES COMPANY 54.68 FREIGHT 140510 DOUGLAS J.DAVIS&ASSOC..INC. 54.074.30 CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ASSESSMENT 144-IA 140511 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $16.050.37 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 140612 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $34,742.95 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN 140513 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $1.708.98 OFFICE EOUIPMENT 140514 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE.INC. $5.372.48 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL M.O.1-13-92 140515 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $716.27 PAINT SUPPLIES 140516 ESP NORTH 33U.ee ELECTRIC PARTS 140517 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING $103.59 LAB SUPPLIES 1406IS EASTMAN,INC. $3.81643 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140519 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-1D-92 140520 ENVIRONMENTAL PROD.USA $2,067.72 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140521 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $750.50 LAB SERVICES 140522 FLUID TECH.SALES 51,103.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140523 MARSHALL FAIRRES $78,08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 140524 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE SI,820.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9.91 140525 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $98,50 AIR FREIGHT 140526 FIRSTCHOICE $356.00 OFFICE EOUIPMENT 140527 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $1.116.16 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 140528 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $340A9 LAB SUPPLIES 140529 FLO-SYSTEMS $222.62 PUMP PARTS 140530 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $156.27 PHOTO SUPPLIES 140531 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $25,294.66 WATER USE 140532 THE FOXBORO CO. $1,516.10 ELECTRIC PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 929/94 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/05M POSTING DATE 10/05M WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140533 CITY OF FULLERTON f35711 WATER USE 140534 FURON DEKORON $1.791,31 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140535 DIST.INC. $82.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140536 GANAHL LUMBER CO. 52,421.99 LUMBERAIARDWARE 140537 GEAR TECH E800.00 MECHANICAL INSPECTION 140538 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $175.17 ELECTRIC PARTS 140539 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $119.19 TELEPHONE SERVICES 140MO GENICOM CORPORATION $507.29 PRINTING SUPPLIES 1405/1 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $8.027.99 MECHANICAL PARTS 140542 WIN GRAINGER,INC. $61.85 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140543 GRASBY S.T.I. $3.826.00 ENGINE PARTS 140544 DGA CONSULTANTS $5.270.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-8-94 140U5 DON GREEK 8 ASSOC. $29,147.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-36R 140546 DAVID R.GRIFFIN $17.616.0 LEGAL SERVICES-TECHITE PIPE 140M7 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. f18&84 TRUCK PARTS Rl 140548 HACH COMPANY $500.94 OPERATION SUPPLIES x 140549 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $450.97 ELECTRIC PARTS 2 140551 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $1,500,00 PUMP PARTS C to 140552 FR J.HARRPERIS SC f1,580J30 TELE TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 140563 SIMJ.INRIRK.IN E673.92 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT 140553 HATCH 8 KIRK.INC. f1,873.92 ENGINE PARTS n 1405M Pl.HAWN CO,INC. $139.43 FILTERS LJ4 140 HE WLETTPACKARD 1 .00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 1405% HISTIWOAROAUTOMON $1.324.78 TRUCK PARTS 140557 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $433.69 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140558 HOKE CONTROLS DIV.MOKE,INC. f144.01 VALVES 140559 MARGARET M.HOLM $5.000.00 LIABILITY SETTLEMENT 140560 HOLMES&NARVER INC. $64.633.42 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pld 140MI HOME DEPOT $203.78 SMALL HARDWARE 140562 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $317.07 PAINT SUPPLIES 140563 ORANGE COUNTY FED CREDIT UNION EBBO.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 140564 IC MEYERS PROPERTIES f75.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 140565 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $80,941.72 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.1/-1&92 14NN INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS E955.22 CONNECTORS 140567 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $261.21 TRUCK PARTS 140568 INORGANIC VENTIIRES $139.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140569 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS SWI.97 BATTERIES 140570 INVITROGEN $105.60 LAB SUPPLIES 140571 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.54 WATER USE 140572 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $1,060.80 PRINTING 140573 JAMISON ENGINEERING $13.662.95 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140574 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $321.12 JANITORW.SUPPLIES 140575 JAY'S CATERING f170.35 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 140576 JERSEY LAB SUPPLY f11&OO LAB SUPPLIES 1405" JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $ISOA7 ELECTRIC PARTS 14078 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $162.24 TOOLS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9nW94 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10105M POSTINGDATE10105194 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140579 KAMAN BEARINGS B SUPPLY $133.35 MACHINE SUPPLIES 14D580 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $273.33 MOTOR REPAIRS 140581 KIMMEL-MOTZ REFRIGERATION $433.93 MACHINE REPAIRS 140582 KING BEARING,INC. $57.58 MACHINE SUPPLIES 140583 KIRST PUMP S MACHINE WORKS $1,218.04 PUMP PARTS 140584 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES ST736.09 TOOLS 140585 LCO POWER SYSTEMS $1.100.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140586 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $SS8.37 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 140587 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $1.570.74 PUMP PARTS 140583 LAKEWOOD INSTRUMENTS $203.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140559 LAWICRANDALL,INC. $1.695.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.7-13.84 140590 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L.LAVOIE $534.52 LEGAL SERVICES-NITZEN 140591 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGR. $67,572.98 ENGINEERING SERVICES P14D-1 140592 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $5,744.30 DEFERRED COMP TRUSTEE TRANSFER m 140593 LOCAL AGENCY S500A0 LAFCO FEES X 140594 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $970.00 OCEAN MONITORING MG&10 W Z 140595 MACOMCO $577.20 SERVICEAGREEMENT 140596 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION.INC. $571,156.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 tz 140597 MARKON COMPUTER SCIENCE $197.00 OFFICE MACHINE "4 140598 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $197.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES I40599 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $2,154.95 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES n I40600 MCKENNA ENGR.B EQUIP. $3,790.0 PUMP PARTS -G 140601 MCWELCO RACK-N-BOX CO. $2.064.60 TOOL BOXES I40602 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $2,657.53 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140603 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $770.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 1406M MILLTRONICS $645.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140605 MISCO $2,543.49 OFFICE FURNITURE 140808 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4,033.33 UNIFORM RENTALS 140601 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO. $1.455,40 SUBSCRIPTION 140608 MONTGOMERY WATSON $44.134.29 AIR TOXICS PROJECT M.O.12.12-90 140609 MURPHY INDUSTRIAL COATINGS $4.700.00 PAINT REMOVAL 140610 NASCO WEST,INC. $308.11 LAB SUPPLIES 140611 NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S $69.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140612 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $370.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 140613 NEAL SUPPLY CO, $M.75 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140814 NEUTRON $7.118.64 CHEMICALS 140615 CRY OF NEWPORT BEACH $5,29 WATER USE 14MIS OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $367.70 SAFETY GLASSES 14DB17 OMEGA ENGINEERING,INC. $INS1 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 14WI8 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $139.25 TRUCK PARTS 140619 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $2,348.65 CHEMICALS 140620 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $3,182.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140621 ORANGE COURIER $133.65 COURIER SERVICES 140522 ORION PRINTING B DESIGN $1,15328 PRINTING 140823 ORANGE OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 5621.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 140524 OXYGEN SERVICE $415.83 SPECIALTY GASES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9129M PAGE OS REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1010SM POSTING DATE 10/0594 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140625 ORANGE COUNTY HEALTH CARE AGCY $1.620.00 SLUDGE SPILL REPORT 140626 PGC SCIEN TIFICS CORPORATION 3402.50 LAB SUPPLIES 140627 PSSI $3,568.60 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 140620 PACIFIC PARTS $3.179.03 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140629 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $1.516.02 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140630 PACIFIC BELL $151.59 TELEPHONE SERVICES 140631 PACIFIC WALK-IN MEDICAL $130.00 MEDICAL SERVICES 140632 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $280.00 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 140633 PAGENET $1,175.84 PAGER RENTALS 140634 PALMIERI,MER.WEINER. $42.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O6-12-91 140635 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 140636 PARTS UNLIMITED $787.37 TRUCK PARTS 140637 PASCAL B LUDWIG $122.031.36 CONSTRUCTION P1312 14W38 PASCAL AND LUDWIG $54,992.10 CONSTRUCTION P243.1 m 14DS39 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $720.75 LAB SUPPLIES X 1406/0 PERMASEAL $1,091.77 LURE OIL ti 14DS41 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $149.897.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.541-91 CG 140642 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 140643 POLYPURE,INC. 924.596.08 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.}11-92 140644 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5,000.D0 POSTAGE 140645 PREMIER STEEL $1.353.74 METAL 1 14MB PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGNIT.,INC. $6,827.77 FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.B8-94 140647 QUESTRON CORP. 3108.W LAB REPAIRS 140648 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $160.55 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 140649 DR.SHIVAJI RAMALINGAM $324.60 LAB SUPPLIES 140650 RED WING SHOES $229.30 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 140551 ROYCE INSTRUMENT 9621.99 INSTRUMENTPARTS 140652 RYAN-NERCO 3840.90 PUMP PARTS 140663 SAN DIEGO SAFETY COUNCIL $17,123.04 TRAINING REGISTRATION 1400M SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $3,485.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES f4D655 R.CRAIG SCOTT B ASSOC. $23.709.46 LEGAL SERVICES-PERSONNEL ISSUES 140656 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1,577.78 SPECIALTY GASES M0657 SHURELUCK SALES 310,79439 TOOLS41ARDWARE 14W5S SIOU MFG CO. $2,044.56 TOOLS 140659 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $63.33 LAB SUPPLIES 140660 SIMS WELDING SUPPLY $34.00 131OFILTRATION PART 140661 SKALAR,INC. $188.41 LAB REPAIRS 140662 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $35.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 140663 SMITH PIPE 6 SUPPLY $391.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1406M SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $96.286.92 POWER 140665 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. 82.W4.60 NATURALGAS 140666 SOUTHLAND SHADE $148.46 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140667 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $8,119830 METER f40666 WESTALLOY.INC. $998.17 WELDING SUPPLIES 140fi69 SPEX INDUSTRIES.INC. $815.61 LAB SUPPLIES 140S70 SPIRE TECHNOLOGIES SYS.DIV. $3.529.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE%29AJ4 PAGE N REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1010501 POSTING DATE 10105AM WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 140671 STEVENS WATER MONITORING SYS. $919.01 SCALE REPAIRS 140572 STRATAGENE $346.87 LAB SUPPLIES 140673 GARY G.S7REED $2.731.39 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 6 TRAVEL 140574 SUNSETFORD 1158.10 TRUCKPARTS 100675 TCH ASSOCIATES $464.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140676 TRW SPACE 8 ELECTRONICS GROUP $1.610.00 LAB SUPPLIES 1406T7 TALENT TREE PERSONNEL SERVICES $1,853.15 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL 140678 TEKTRONIX.INC. $696.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140679 THOMAS FISH COMPANY $107,25 LAB SUPPLIES 140680 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1.066.79 MECHANICAL PARTS 140681 THORPE INSULATION f156.47 PIPE 140682 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES f3,82ILS) TRAVEL SERVICES M.OWSM 140683 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $247.35 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 14MB4 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. f423.32 TRUCK PARTS m 140685 TRUESDAIL LABS $996.94 LAB SERVICES X 14MBS JG TUCKER B SON,INC. $2,998.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS 2 140687 TUSTIN DODGE $1222 TRUCK PARTS 14MBS TWINING LABORATORIES $16.429.72 SOIL TESTING M.O.7.1344 140689 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $118,98 TRUCK PARTS --I 14MM UNISOURCE WOR BUTLER PAPER $1,052.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140691 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $305.14 PARCEL SERVICES 1 140692 US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE $490.00 SUBSCRIPTION ON 140693 VWR SCIENTIFIC f237.39 LAB SUPPLIES 140694 VALLEY CRIES SUPPLY CO. f3.168AX PLUMBING SUPPLIES 14W95 VILLAGE NURSERIES $125.88 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 140696 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $49,609.14 CHEMICALS M.O.3.9-94 140697 WATERS CORPORATION $7.450.57 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140698 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $29.757.99 CAUSTIC SODA B HYPOCHLORIDE M.0.8-12-9284.13.94 140699 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. f460S3 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140700 JOHN WILEY 8 SONS,INC. f23SA3 PUBLICATION 140701 WIRTH GAS EQUIPMENT SZM.20 ENGINE PARTS 140702 WMEG $127.15 LAB SUPPUES 140703 ROURKE.WOODRUFF B SPRADLIN $5O,729.37 LEGAL SERVICES M0.2-19-92 140704 XEROX CORP. $597.27 COPIER LEASES 140705 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. f878.02 CHARTS 140706 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10NSM1J0 f3,2H,821.80 FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9R9/94 PAGED] REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1010 POSTING DATE 10105M SUMMARY AMOUNT 02 OPER FUND $4.413.63 02 CAP FAC FUND 567.756.23 03 OPER FUND 58.030.11 03 CAP FAC FUND 17,616.96 05 OPER FUND 6.310.15 45 CAP FAC FUND 14.00 07 OPER FUND 5.174.88 011 OPER FUND 15,755.91 011 CAP FAC FUND 452.00 614 OPER FUND 410.00 0f4 CAP FAG FUND 24,472.79 0590 OPER FUND 2.491.20 0596 CAP FAC FUND 4.919.74 rri X 0887 OPER FUND 2.938.39 = 0814 OPER FUND 4,06f.93 JT OPER FUND 637.371.26 CORP 1,670,621.09 i--i SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 53.693.92 D JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 182,803.04 V $3,241.921.60 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10112194 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10H9194 POSTING DATE 10H9M4 WARRANT NO VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140736 AG TECH COMPANY $60,457.14 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9.91 140737 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $39.829.09 CONSTRUCTION P1-3&1 140738 AIR PRODUCTS B CHEMICALS $18.475.70 O&M AGREEMENT DAY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-989 140739 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $142,557.50 CONSTRUCTION P2-53.1 140740 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5619.73 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 140741 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY S497D0 PUBLICATION 140742 AMERSCO,INC. $193.05 LAB SUPPLIES 140743 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $1.619.10 SEWER REPAIRS 140744 ANIKTER-DISTRIBUTION $1,953.38 OFFICE FURNITURE 140745 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $519.92 NOTICES BADS 140748 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $35.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 140747 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140748 AUDIO VIDEO REPORTING SERVICE $96.59 PUBLICATION 140749 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3.088.14 PAYROLL SERVICES m 140750 SKK LANDFILL 54.SW.68 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 X 140751 BANANA BLUEPRINT $2,869.93 PRINTINGMOAG.10.90 ti 140752 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS 1126.00 PUBLICATION IA 140753 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $383.08 BATTERIES 1407M BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS.INC. $2,087.01 LAB SUPPLIES 140755 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $950.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT LA 140756 810 VENTURES.INC. 5162.00 LAB SUPPLIES 1 140757 BLACK B VEATCH $1,OB4.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2< ~ 140758 BLAIRA"TIN CO.,INC. $513.01 VALVES 140759 SOERINGER MANNHEIM $640.49 LAB SUPPLIES 140760 SOUSA,RADIATOR SERVICE $416.51 TRUCK REPAIRS 140761 SONA-RUES $49.05 TRUCK PARTS 140762 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $39,349.99 ENGINEERING SERVICES S-1363-38 140763 BRENNER-FIEOLER B ASSOC.,INC. 5462.40 LAB SUPPLIES 140764 BUDGET JANITORIAL 5675.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 140765 BUYGHEM DISTRIBUTORS $815.89 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140766 CEPA 585.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140767 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 LAB SERVICES 140768 C M 1 $463.69 ELECTRIC PARTS 140769 C.P.I. $1,110.62 LAB SUPPLIES 140770 SRTC941CWPCA,INC. 5410.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140771 CAD VENTURES 5183.17 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 140772 CAERE CORP. 5147.60 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 140773 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH,INC. $1,613.94 LAB SUPPLIES 140774 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $412.37 TRUCK PARTS 140775 CALIF.ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS $1.316.01 MECHANICAL PARTS 140775 CAUSCIENCE ENVIRONMENTAL LABS $560.00 LAB SERVICES 140777 CAPITALWESTWARD $175.54 MECHANICAL PARTS 140778 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS 571,935.64 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pi-38 140779 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. 5547.08 OFFICE FURNITURE 140780 CENTURY PAINT 5210.70 PAINT SUPPLIES 140781 CENTURY SAFETY MST.B SUPPLY $1,379.75 SAFETY SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10112M PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10119/94 POSTING DATE 10H99N WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140782 COAST RUBBER STAMP $60.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140783 COUCH 6 SONS 1165,875,89 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 140184 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 5499111 PUMP PARTS 140785 COMPUSERVE $239.66 COMPUTER SERVICES 140186 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV, $57.78 TRUCK PARTS 140787 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $162,09 FREIGHT 140788 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. S4,025.81 TOOLS 140789 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. 54,832.59 CHLORINE M.O.10-11.93 140790 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS $1,312.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140791 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C 82,962.14 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.S.11.93 140792 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $20,337.91 ENGINE PARTS 140793 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY S448.65 TRUCK PARTS 1407" COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 526.94 ELECTRIC PARTS 140795 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $169.90 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEE m 140796 DME,INC. $2.075.27 PLUMBING SUPPLIES X 140797 DANIELS RITE SERVICE $204.79 TRUCK PARTS 2 140798 DE GUELLE B SONS GLASS CO. $391.56 BUILDING REPAIRS W 140799 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $41.287.37 DENTAL INSURANCE PLAN 140800 DIALOG INFORMATION SERVICES $75,00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 140801 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CC, 140902 DWYER INSTRUMENT,INC. $123.24 INSTRUMENT 140803 OVALS SALES $2,673.81 FITTINGS N 140804 EGA(ENGINEERING DESIGN AUTO) 5995.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140805 E J L 8 ASSOC. E2,337.05 LAB SERVICES 140808 EASTMAN,INC. $7,659.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140907 EBERHARD EOUIPMENT 5890.110 TRUCK PARTS 140808 ECOANALYSIS,INC. $2.527.00 CONSULTING SERVICES MOM ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHING $482.00 SUBSCRIPTION 140810 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,920.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O. -M92 140811 ESSCO PUMPS AND CONTROLS $693.78 PUMP PARTS 140812 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING SUPPLY $91.10 LAB SUPPLIES 140813 EXCELLENCE IN TRAINING $20.00 TRAINING SUPPLIES 140914 EXCHANGER V40RKS B FABRICATION 8450.00 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140816 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 210.099.17 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 10-9.91 140816 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $42.75 AIR FREIGHT 140817 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $3.99 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 140818 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. S]84.11 LAB SUPPLIES 140819 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $700.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140820 FLO-SYSTEMS 93.101.42 PUMP PARTS 140821 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $71.93 PHOTO SUPPLIES 140822 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 5525.00 FIRE PERMIT 140823 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 54,244.97 PAINT SUPPLIES 140824 FREDSON RV SUPPLY 5457.85 TRUCK PARTS 14D025 GST,INC. $8n 20 OFFICE EGUIPMENT 140826 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $27.05 PRINTING 140027 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $324.27 ELECTRIC PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10112/94 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10119/94 POSTING DATE 10HB194 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140828 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.705.78 TELEPHONE SERVICES 140829 GERHARDTS,INC. $905.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140830 GIERLICH-MRCHELL,INC. 98,571.88 PUMP PARTS 140831 N GLANTZ 8 SON $565.69 BUILDING MATERIALS 140832 GOLDEN COAST SAWDUST PROD. $1,616.26 SAWDUST 140833 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $265.07 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 140834 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $650.59 PRINTING 140535 DGACONSULTANTS 310,133.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-0-M 1408M GROTH EQUIPMENT CORP. $76.23 FREIGHT 140837 HB TYPE B GRAPHICS $473.64 PRINTING 1408M HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $134.79 MUCK PARTS 140839 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $536.65 ELECTRIC PARTS 140840 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC 33864I PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140841 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1.650.00 CONTAINER RENTALS rn 140842 HAUSER ENGINEERING 31,188.60 LAB SERVICES X 14D043 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $1.450.00 LAB EQUIPMENT x 140844 PL HAWN CO,INC. $1.495.60 FILTERS 140845 JOHN C.HEN13ERGER CO. $1,001.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140846 HILTI,INC. $280.45 ELECTRIC PARTS -1 140847 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $55A4 COMPRESSOR PARTS tv 140848 HOME CONTROLS DNMOKE.INC. $97.45 VALVES 11 140849 HOME DEPOT $1,012.94 HARDWARE W 140850 RS HUGHES CO,INC. 9398.52 PAINT SUPPLIES 140851 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN $212A I BICYCLE PARTS 140852 IDEXX $407.98 LAB SUPPLIES 140853 IMAGING PLUS $331,25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1408M IMPERIALWEST CHEMICAL $36.357.83 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11.18-92 140855 IMPULSE ENTERPRISE $799.47 CABLE 14080 INDUSTRIAL AIR COMPRESSOR $345.36 COMPRESSOR PARTS 140857 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $282% CONNECTORS 140859 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $624.41 BATTERIES 140859 JAMISON ENGINEERING $10.418.55 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140860 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1,194.66 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 14D061 JAYS CATERING $297.08 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 140862 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $326.09 ELECTRIC PARTS 140863 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $1.920.65 PUMP 140864 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY 82B8.19 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 140865 KING BEARING,INC. $1.036.01 MACHINE SUPPLIES 140866 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,573.13 TOOLS 140867 KURZ INSTRUMENTS,INC. $2.962.37 METER 1405M LA UOUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $105.19 PUMP PARTS 140869 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L.LAVOIE $130.00 LEGAL SERVICES-NITZEN 14D070 LEGI-TECH $320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 140871 LEYBOLD VACUUM PRODUCTS $191.55 LAB SUPPLIES 140872 LIEBERTCORPORATION $479.80 ELECTRIC PARTS 140873 LIMITORQUE CORP. $3,198.59 VALVES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IWIV 4 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10119RN POSTING DATE 10/19/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140674 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $8.249.25 CONSULTING SERV.-ENVIR0N.M.0.12.9-90 140875 LORAIN PRODUCTS 111,31735 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140876 LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORP. $75.04 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140877 LUX SCIENTIFIC INST.CORP. S11D55 LAB SUPPLIES 140878 MULTILIN,INC. f2,614.90 ELECTRIC PARTS 140879 MPS $95.0 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 140880 MANDIC MOTORS f98.00 TOWING SERVICES 1401181 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $9,271.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140882 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 5504.33 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140883 MCGRAW-HILL PUBLICATIONS CO. $128.06 PUBLICATION 140884 CHUCK MCRANEY $314.43 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 140885 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES $1.311.99 ELECTRIC PARTS 14088E MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $17313 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 140887 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS $74.601.71 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT m 140888 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $749.07 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.11.18.92 X 140889 MICROBICS CORPORATION $98.15 CHEMICALS s-� 140890 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $3.135.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS w 140691 MISCO $917.89 ENGINE PARTS —f 140892 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.209.47 UNIFORM RENTALS 140893 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL,INC. $148.70 PUBLICATION w 140ON MLADEN BUNRCH CONSTRUCTION SI.N1,690.00 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A r 140895 MONITOR LABS $1,750.87 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140896 MONTOOMERY WATSON f18,000.00 OCRWRP FEASIBILITY STUDY 140897 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. f201.96 MECHANICAL PARTS 140098 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOC. $96.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 140899 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES,INC. $9,768,30 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 140900 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL E370.M TRAINING REGISTRATION 1409011 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL f162.08 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 140902 RORY NELSON f24,400.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 140903 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $193.54 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1409M NORTHWEST CARBON $3.455.13 CHEMICALS 140905 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $798.32 SAFETY GLASSES 140908 OFFICE PAVILIONSIINTERIOR RESOURCES $141.12 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140907 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,542.28 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1409M ORANGE COURIER $89.10 COURIER SERVICES 140M ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $1.567.30 FITTINGS 140910 CO OF ORANGE-AUDITOR CONTROLLER s4mo00 HEALTH SERVICE FEE 140911 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $600.00 DEFERRED COMP TAKES 140912 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $19,225.01 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 140B13 COUNTY OF ORANGE 1111,000.00 SEWER LINE PROTECTION M.0."-94 140914 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT f70,005 W GAP WATER USE M.0.&9-93 140915 PGC SCIENTIFIC$CORPORATION $60.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140910 PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH LABS f217.OD LAB SUPPLIES 140917 PACO SALES $205.80 PAINT SUPPLIES 140916 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY f1,337.34 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140910 PACIFIC PARTS 33,282.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IW12tg4 PAGE 05 REPORT NUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLMMSPAIDI0/19194 POSTING DATE 10119M WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140920 PACIFIC PROCESS EOUIPMENT 5350.08 PUMP PARTS 140921 PACIFIC BELL $19.73 TELEPHONE SERVICES MD922 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. S2M.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 140923 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $7,734.00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 140924 PARTS UNLIMITED $371.61 TRUCK PARTS 140925 KPMG PEAT MARWICK CPA 518.811.00 AUDITING SERVICES M.0.5.11-94 140926 PEDERSON COMMUNICATIONS 55,713.09 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 140927 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $3.578.65 LAB SUPPLIES 140928 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $140,356.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 140929 POLY ENTERPRISES,INC. 5800.79 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140930 RHONE POULENE 54,325.89 CHEMICALS 140931 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $272.00 ICE 140932 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1,715.43 TRASH REMOVAL 140933 THE REGISTER $66100 NOTICES BADS m 1409M REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. 5540.00 OCEAN MONITORING x 140935 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT.CORP. $405.70 LAB SUPPLIES 140936 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL $1,009.42 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES p0 140937 ROTANIUM PRODUCTS CO. $269,48 ELECTRIC PARTS 140938 SOR,INC. $87.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS 140939 BANDON ENGINEERING,INC. $7,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES tp 140940 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $732.70 ELECTRIC PARTS I 140WI SARBS-PDC 51.200.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 140942 SANTA FE SAG CO. $32.05 FREIGHT 140943 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $67.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 140914 SEA COAST DESIGNS $596.23 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 140945 SHURELUCK SALES $3.381.93 TOOLSRIAROWARE 14091B SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. S21SAS PUBLICATION 140947 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $1,337.52 TOOLS 140948 SOUTH COAST WATER $10315 LAB SUPPLIES 140949 SOUTHERN CALIF.EDISON CO. $2.330.91 POWER 140950 $O CALIF.EDISON CO. $32.741.38 POWER 140951 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $10.549.80 NATURAL GAS 140952 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 921,389.20 DIESELJUNLEADED FUEL 140953 SOUTH SHORE WINDOWMAINT. $2.083.33 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 140954 SOUVENIR PHOTO $111.51 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 140955 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,737.81 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 140956 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS $3.880.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 140957 GARY G.STREED $6.332.90 REIMB,PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL 140958 SULLIVAN,WORKMAN 8 DEE,TRUST $10t00 REIMBURSE COURT FEES 140959 SUNSET FORD $656.12 TRUCK PARTS 140M SUPER CHEM CORP. $1,338.85 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 140961 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. $03.32 TOOLS 140982 TALENT TREE PERSONNEL SERVICES $2.740.04 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 140963 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $528.41 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 140964 TECHNOMIC PUBLISHING CO,INC. 5185.W BOOKS 140*5 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $495,70 MECHANICAL PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10112M PAGE 06 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10H9194 POSTING DATE 10I19/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 140966 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP $238,00 PUBLICATION 140967 TONY'S LOCK B SAFE SERVICE $2511.78 LOCKS B KEYS 140968 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $1.981.78 TRAVEL SERVICES M.044894 140969 TROPICAL PLA7A NURSERY,INC. $3,455.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M O.5-11.94 140970 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $718.66 TRUCK PARTS 140971 TRUESDAIL LABS 54,384.9E LAB SERVICES 140972 JG TUCKER 6 SON.INC. $6,269.46 INSTRUMENTPARTS 140973 CITY OF TUSTIN $7,907.76 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS 140974 TWINING LABORATORIES $18.971.62 SOIL TESTING W0.7-13.94 140975 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS 580.00 TRUCK PARTS 140976 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC 5810.00 LAB SUPPLIES 140977 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 11227.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 140978 UNISOURCE MR BUTLER PAPER $570.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 140979 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $669.21 PARCEL SERVICES 140980 UNIVERSITY MICROFILM,INC. $71.06 PUBLICATION m 140981 VWR SCIENTIFIC $790.25 LAB SUPPLIES X 140982 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. S4,693.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 2 140983 VARWN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 5541.87 LAB SUPPLIES 140 U VERNE'S PLUMBING $235.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 140985 VILLAGE NURSERIES $24.44 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 140986 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $12.214.29 CHEMICALS M.G.3-9-94 I 140987 GUY L.WARDEN B SONS 51,14/.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES O1 140988 WEATHER 8 WIND INSTRUMENT S661.56 SAFETY SUPPLIES 140989 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY S20,303.60 CAUSTIC SODA 6 HYPOCHLORIDE M.O.8-12-9284.1 94 140990 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $74.02 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 140991 XEROX CORP. $11.963.08 COPIER LEASES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID IO IMI S2,513,4n.87 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE IO 12194 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBERAP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FUND NO 9199 - J7 DIST WORKING CAPITAL SUMMARY AMOUNT O1 OPER FUND 7.121.93 02 OPER FUND 22.073.94 02 CAP FAC FUND 10,011.00 03OPERFUND 40.095.24 03 CAP FAC FUND 27.427.40 05 OPER FUND 10.910.97 05 CAP FAC FUND 1.742.34 05 OPER FUND 11.748.03 05 CAP FAC FUND 13,111.19 M OPER FUND 14,655.12 011 OPER FUND 7.213.17 011 CAP FAC FUND 165,975.59 rn 013 OPER FUND 101.53 X 014 OPER FUND 597.03 014 CAP FAC FUND 1,059,067.26 0539 CAP FAG FUND 1.950,30 tz 07514 OPER FUND 991.17 --I JT OPER FUND 737.648.19 b0 CORP 157,598.43 1 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 00,649.10 V H DIST WORKING CAPITAL 147,479.28 02,513,477.07 Y STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on �1 19 I was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts ' offices oniy�„j 19 QW. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9i day of //,pp 19Qy � Pe Any Ry e s ant Secretary o each of th OdWs of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 5 14 of Orange County, California F27A.1