Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1994-09-14
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 c 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 c4^^'ce cW (7141962-2411 September 9, 1994 NOTICE OF MEETING JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1444 - 7:30 P-M- DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above location, time and date. Assistant Bo Up S V etary Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, September 21 s1, at 5:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE SUBCOMMITTEE - Wednesday, September 28th, at 4:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, September 28th, at 5:30 p.m. JOINT WORKS SELECTION - Wednesday, September 28th, COMMITTEE (Immediately fallowing Executive Committee Meeting) OPERATIONS COMMITTEE - Wednesday, October 5th, at 5:30 p.m. ENGINEERING AND - Thursday, October 6th, at 5:30 p.m. CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS BI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10"4 ELUB AVENUE PO.BOX s121 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92]28.012) JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES n+Al sszzAtt Joint Board Meetings Executive committee Meetings September Sep 14, 1994 Sep 28, 1994 October Oct 12, 1994 Oct 26, 1994 November Nov 09, 1994 None Scheduled December Dec 14, 1994 None Scheduled January Jan 11, 1995 Jan 25, 1995 February Feb 08, 1995 Feb 22, 1995 March Mar 08, 1995 Mar 22, 1995 April Apr 12, 1995 Apr 26, 1995 May May 10, 1995 May 24, 1995 June Jun 14, 1995 Jun 28, 1995 July Jul 12, 1995 Jul 26, 1995 August Aug 09, 1995 None Scheduled September Sep 13, 1995 Sep 27, 1995 AGENDA JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 14, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. I --------'- --'------------......-...................................-............ �_� In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda has been posted in the main lobby of the Districts' Administrative Offices not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials j relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the office of the iBoard Secretary. i In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 1 54954.2(b)as an emergency item or that there is a need to take immediate action which need came to the attention of the Districts subsequent to the posting of the j agenda, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). 09/14/94 16) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - August 10, 1994 regular District 2 - August 10, 1994 regular District 3 - August 10, 1994 regular District 5 - August 10, 1994 regular District 6 - July 13, 1994 regular, and August 10, 1994 regular District 7 - August 10, 1994 regular District 11 - August 10, 1994 regular District 13 - August 10, 1994 regular District 14 - August 10, 1994 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shell be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See pages�A", "8",=and "D" (Carried over from 8/10/94 Mtg.) 07/13/94 07/27/9a DISTRICT NO. 6 - 365.28 5,504.28 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 46,671.47 4,688.58 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,873.21 0.00 $42,909.96 s10.192.96 08/10/94 08/24/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - S 609,456.07 8 962,778.97 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,347,279.01 844,812.31 Joint Working Capital Fund - 552,949.87 425,160.71 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 10,639.29 4,535.83 DISTRICT NO, I - 7,361.32 0.00 DISTRICT NO, 2 - 24,167.94 3,887.32 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 41,101.17 108,687.32 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 4,869.90 43,580.88 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 7,333.14 0.00 DISTRICT NO, 7 - 19,762.32 60.615.33 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 15,759.81 233,392.70 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 101.72 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 11,401.48 1,101,579.32 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 0.00 31900.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 0.00 124,892.18 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 2,428.99 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 345,5 7,051.08 $2,652,528.62 ®3.927.302.92 -2- 09/14/94 (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 90) j All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these j items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action ' approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall 1 ( be considered in the regular order of business. I I ( Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. I ' The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent i calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-104, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification No. C-034, to FMC Corporation, for a unit delivered price of $2.252 per gallon, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning October 1 , 1994, with provision for two one-year extensions (Estimated annual cost $1 ,013,400.00 plus sales tax). See page "E" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to J.G. Tucker & Son, Inc., in the amount of $52,1 80.00,plus sales tax, for Purchase of Portable Gas Detectors (Specification No. E-247). (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to PacTel Meridian Systems for Amendment No. 3 to the Telephone System Maintenance Agreement for the Districts' telephone PBX and related equipment (Specification No. S-060), to extend said agreement for a twelve- month period from August 22, 1994 to August 21 , 1995, for an amount not to exceed $33,048.00 for existing equipment. -3- 09/14/94 (9) ALL DISTRICTS- (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of the following actions relative to the contract for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1: (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $35,000.00 from the contract with Amelco Construction, a Division of Amelco Industries. See page "F" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-105,accepting said contract as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. See page "G" (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint, Westside Building Material Corp. vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and Javaid Contractors, Inc., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 735140,relative to a stop notice filed by a subcontractor against - Districts' contractor, and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. See page "H" DISTRICTS 3 & 11 (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1,authorizing an addition of $20,988.00 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, for five items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 14 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "I" DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (g) Consideration of the following actions relative to Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3: (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-116,approving Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Newport Beach providing for reimbursement of costs to the Districts for City's sewer facilities to be constructed in connection with Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, in form approved by General Counsel. See page (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-117,approving plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (tentative bid date is October 11, 1994). See page "K" -4- 09/14/94 (9) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (CARRIED OVER FROM 8/10/94 BOARD MEETING DUE TO LACK OF A QUORUM IN DISTRICT 6) IN Consideration of the following actions relative to the contract for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4: (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of $118,439.00to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc., dba Colich & Sons, for one item of added work, and granting a time extension of 57 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "L" (2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $61,158.36 from the contract with Colich Bros., Inc., dba Colich & Sons. See page "M" (3) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-101,accepting said contract as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. See page "N" DISTRICT 7 (i), Consideration of Resolution No. 94-118-7,approving Reimbursement Agreement with the County of Orange Environmental Management Agency, providing for reimbursement of costs to the District to include certain road resurfacing and widening work in connection with construction of Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22. See page "0" (j) Consideration of motion to receive and file petition from Leason F. Pomeroy, III, and Dr. William H. Metzger requesting annexation of 1.44 acres of territory to the District, in the vicinity north of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Foothill Boulevard in unincorporated county territory; and consideration of Resolution No. 94-119-7,authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 144- Pomeroy Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). See pages "P" and g END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -5- 09/14/94 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Minutes of the Executive Committee (copies enclosed with Directors' Executive Committee agenda material). (1) Receive and file draft Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers for the meeting held on August 17, 1994 (2) Receive and file draft Executive Subcommittee Minutes for the meeting held on August 24, 1994 (3) Receive and file draft Executive Committee Minutes for the meeting held on August 25, 1994 (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said committees: (1) Consideration of the following actions relative to Plant Automation Status Report and Recommendations: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Square D Company for Factory Configuration and Testing of CRISP/32 Software and DEC Hardware for Plants 1 and 2 (Specification No. E-246-1), for an amount not to exceed $84,824.00 plus applicable taxes, in accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement dated July 13, 1994 with Square D Company. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-106,approving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ch2M Hill for design and programming services required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31, providing for additional design, software integration and standards development services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $523,300.00 for traditional engineering services, and $785,900.00 for software integration services, increasing the total authorized compensation from $742,148.00to an amount not to exceed $2,060,348.00. See page "R" -6- [ITEM It 1)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 71 09114/94 (11) ALL DISTRICTS(Continued from page 6) (b) (1) (c) Consideration of motion approving the acquisition and use of standardized Programmable Logic Computers manufactured by Modicon, for use throughout the treatment plant and collection system facilities for computerized automation. (2) Consideration of the following actions relative to formation of Plant Automation Group: (a) Report of Ernst & Young re proposed Plant Automation Group (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 94.107,amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, adding one Systems Engineer ($4495-$6360),one Programmer/Analyst 1$3700-$5235)and one Programmer I S3195-54525)to the Information Services Division, and deleting one Engineer ($4495-$6360)from the Engineering Department, Planning and Design Division. See pagei (3) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-108,approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst & Young to conduct a two-phase, independent review of the Districts' Capital Projects Management Function, including current Districts' organizational structure and management practices, providing for addition of Phase 3, Task 4, Evaluation of Human Resources Function, for an amount not to exceed $60,000.00,increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $235,000.00to an amount not to exceed $295,000.00. See page L (4) Consideration of the following actions relative to Boards' Committee Restructuring: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-109,amending Resolution No. 87.51, Establishing Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business of the Districts, relative to restructuring of the Boards' committees . See page "U" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-110,amending Resolution No. 90-43, Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Selection and Procurement of Professional Engineering, Architectural, Environmental, Land Surveying and Construction Management Services, relative to transferring Joint Works Selection Commiittee responsibilities for selecting professional services consultants to the appropriate new standing committee of the Boards. See page "V" -7- 09/1 4/94 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Receive and file draft minutes of the Joint Works Selection Committee meeting held on August 25, 1994. (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (b) Consideration of action on the following item recommended by said Committee: (1) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch for engineering evaluation and design and construction support services required for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, providing for additional engineering design services pertaining to chemical feed facilities modifications: (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with Black & Veatch for said services (Copy enclosed with Selection Committee Minutes). (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-111,approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Black & Veatch for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit for an additional amount not to exceed $11 ,100.00,increasing the total authorized compensation from $379,715.00to an amount not to exceed $390,815.00. See page "W" -8- [ITEM If 2)(b)(2) CONTINUED ON PAGE 91 09/14/94 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 8) (b) (2) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. for preparation of emissions inventory report and health risk assessment report in order to comply with AB 2588, California Air Toxic "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987, providing for a name change to Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc., and providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement: (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services (Copy enclosed with Selection Committee Minutes). (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-112,approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc., providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $398,000.00. See page "X" 031, DISTRICT2 (a) Receive and file draft minutes of the District No. 2 Selection Committee meeting held on August 16, 1994. (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said Committee: (1) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver for preparation of a Project Report re Santa Ana River Interceptor Manhole Erosion Protection and Access Roads, Contract No. 2-14-5R2: (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with Holmes & Narver for said services (Copy enclosed with Selection Committee Minutes). (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-114-2,approving Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $376,729.00. See page "Y" -9- 09/14/94 (14) DISTRICT3 (a) Receive and file draft minutes of the District No. 3 Selection Committee meeting held on August 17, 1994. (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said Committee: (1) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. for permitting, design and construction services for Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Orangethorpe Avenue to Ellis Avenue, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, between Westminster Boulevard and 405 Freeway, Contract No. 3-11 R, providing for additional design services: (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee with DGA Consultants, Inc. for said services (Copy enclosed with Selection Committee Minutes). (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-115-3,approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $13,450.00,increasing the total authorized compensation from $207,000.00to an amount not to exceed $220,450.00. See page "Z" (15) DISTRICT 6 (CARRIED OVER FROM 8/10/94 BOARD MEETING DUE TO LACK OF A QUORUM IN DISTRICT 6) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-95-6,approving Adjustment of Shares of Various Districts of the Cost of Certain Improvements to Joint Facilities Pertaining to 1990-92 Series "C" Certificates of Participation. See page "AA" -10- 09/14/94 (16) ALL DISTRICTS I CLOSED SESSION: During the course of conducting the business set forth I I on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may I convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or j potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code I Sections 54956.9, 54957 or 54957.6. r t ; Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; Ibl matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are I exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by I the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) (1) Confer with Districts' representatives concerning status of negotiations with employee group representatives on salaries, benefits and terms of employment. (a) Districts' Representatives: General Manager, General Counsel, Director of Personnel and Director of Finance (b) Employee Organizations: 0 Operations and Maintenance Employees - International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 501 (2) Professional and Supervisory Employees - Federation of Public Sector Workers (2) Confer with General Counsel re pending litigation: County Sanitation Districts v. Brinderson Corporation and Cooper Industries - arbitration re breach of contract. (Government Code Section 54956.9) (3) Confer with General Counsel re pending litigation: County Sanitation Districts v. United Technologies Corporation and Amoco Chemical - re techite pipe. (Government Code Section 54956.9) (4) Confer with General Counsel re status of claims and administrative proceedings arising out of fire accident, Job No. P2-49. (Government Code Section 54956.9) (5) Confer with Legal Counsel re Sangermano v. County Sanitation Districts. (Government Code Section 54956.9) _11_ [ITEM (16) CONTINUED ON PAGE 121 09/14/94 (16) ALL DISTRICT (Continued from page 11) (c) Reconvene in regular session (d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session (1) Consideration of motion approving the Memorandum of Understanding with the Districts' Operations and Maintenance Employees, represented by the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 501 , for the period November 26, 1993 through November 21, 1996, and authorizing its execution by the General Manager and Personnel Director. (17) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn _12_ 09/14/94 (28) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (32) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (341 DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (35) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn 13- AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AUGUST 25, 1994 - 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday, August 25, 1994, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Larry Seigel, Ernst & Young John C. Cox, Jr. Joint Chairman Mike Klein, Ernst & Young Peer A. Swan Vice Joint Chairman & R. Craig Scott, R. Craig Scott & Associates Chairman, District 14 Jerry Boyle, CHZM Hill William D. Mahoney Past Joint Chairman Alan Carrie, CH,M Hill Fred Barrera Chairman, District 1 John Collins Chairman, District 2 Sal Sapient Chairman, District 3 STAFF PRESENT: Phil Sansone Chairman, District 5 James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Barry Hammond Chairman, District 7 Blake P. Anderson, Director of Grace H. Winchell Chairman, District 11 Engineering John M. Gullixson Chairman, District 13 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Margaret H. Nellor, Director of Technical Services Absent: Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance A. B. Catlin Past Joint Chairman Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Operations Roger Stanton County Supervisor Stuart Severn, Associate Engineer William Steiner County Supervisor APPROVAL OF MINUTES. The minutes of the July 27, 1994, Executive Committee were approved as drafted. Y Minutes of the Executive Committee August 25, 1994 Page 2 PLANT AUTOMATION IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS. In June and July, the Directors considered a staff report and recommendations of the Special Selection Committee Re Computers, and the Executive Committee, based upon the work done to date by CH,M Hill on Job No. J-31, Expansion of Computer and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2. The Boards approved the purchase of two Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) Model 4700A VAX computers, and a site license and maintenance agreement with Square D Company for CRISP/32 software, to improve the plant monitoring capability and to implement computerized plant control. The Special Selection Committee Re Computers met on August 17th to consider several matters pertaining to ongoing implementation of the Districts' computerized systems. Enclosed is a copy of the Computer Committee's August 17th meeting minutes (salmon) that reports its recommendations. Utilizing an overhead projector, Blake Anderson, Director of Engineering reviewed the enclosed 1989 Master Plan "2020 VISION" (gray), and Jerry Boyle, Regional Manager, CH,M Hill, reviewed the enclosed Presentation Highlights (gold), summarizing the following three recommendations for continuing progress toward plant automation: (1)factory configuration and testing of the CRISP/32 software and the DEC hardware; (2) proposed Addendum No. 3 to CH,M Hill Job No. J-31; and (3) standardization with the Modicon Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC). The recommendations: Provide a logical extension of the CH,M Hill work done to date to analyze and resolve the plant-automation needs; Provide a modular approach to satisfying those needs by implementing incremental solutions; Provide the option for plant automation to include data handling, process monitoring and process control; Provide standards for the appearance and operation of all of the automated processes to facilitate operational and maintenance needs; Constitute an initial step in revisiting and updating the "2020 VISION" Master Plan -Volume 5 for"Computer Control, Monitoring and Data Handling Systems." Minutes of the Executive Committee August 25, 1994 Page 3 Special Selection Committee Re Computers Recommendations. The Special Selection Committee Re Computers recommends the following actions for continuing progress towards treatment plant computerized automation: (1) Approve Square D Company Integration Services agreements for Factory Configuration and Testing of CRISP/32 Software and DEC Hardware for Plants 1 and 2 (Specification No. E-246-1) for an amount not to exceed $84,824, plus applicable taxes. (2) Approve Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill for design and programming services required for expansion of existing computerized monitoring and control systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31, for additional design, software integration and standards development services, and authorizing an increase of$532,300 for traditional engineering services, and $785,900 for software integration services, increasing the authorized maximum cost by $1,318,200, from $742,148 to $2,060,348, as follows: PROPOSED ADDENDUM NO 3 TRADITIONAL TOTAL PROPOSED EXISTING DESIGN SOFTWARE PROPOSED AMENDED AGREEMENT ENGINEERING INTEGRATION ADDITION AGREEMENT Engineering Servkes.direct tabor at hourly rates plus $369,064 $438,250 $646,300 $1,082.580 $1.451.644 overnead at 173%.not to exceed Direct Expenses,at cost. 36.000 49,900 71.400 121,300 157.300 not to exceed Subconsuttants.not to 292.575 0 0 0 292.575 exceed Fixed Profit 44.509 46A 68 114 320 1.85 ,$yq Total contract,not to exceed UAZJM $532m Uffim $1 315.200 (3) Approve standardization on Modicon Programmable Logic Controllers for use throughout the plants for computerized control. Executive Committee Recommendation. Following a general discussion of the proposed actions, the Executive Committee concurs with the recommendations of the Special Selection Committee Re Computers. Y Minutes of the Executive Committee August 25, 1994 Page 4 FORMATION OF PLANT AUTOMATION GROUP. As referenced in the above item, a copy of the Minutes of the Special Selection Committee Re Computers August 17, 1994 meeting (salmon) is enclosed. Also enclosed is a copy of the Minutes of the Executive Subcommittee August 24, 1994 meeting (white). Both of said Committees' reports address the proposed formation of a Plant Automation Group in detail. As part of the study project known as Addendum 1 to Job J-31, completed in March 1994, the Districts' engineering consultants, CHZM Hill, reviewed the status of the existing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems, the future systems expansion needs, and the organizational support needed to implement and maintain these systems. This CHZM Hill report has previously been reviewed by the Directors. Section 6 of the CHZM Hill report addresses the organization and skills necessary to implement and maintain the monitoring, control and information systems of the Districts. A copy (goldenrod) of this section, which proposes a special process control group, is enclosed with the above referenced Minutes of the Special Selection Committee Re Computers August 17th meeting, and the Minutes of the Executive Subcommittee August 24th meeting. Also enclosed with said minutes is a copy of a revised staff report (tan) on the proposed Transition Plan to Implement a Plant Automation Group. This proposal and recommendation was considered by a special staff interdepartmental task force in preparation for the 1994-95 Personnel Budget Recommendations. After considerable study, debate and discussion, the staff task force and executive management staff concluded that the Information Services Division should be expanded to assume responsibility for the plant automation, monitoring and control computer systems so that responsibility and accountability for computer activities is centralized in one Division. The skill sets needed for this growing function need to be integrated and unified for best results. This new "group" will need to be on call 24 hours a day, have a close working relationship with Operations, Maintenance and Engineering, provide software development for process control, and manage or oversee the development and implementation of various outside service contracts. The group would utilize existing staff from other Divisions, as needed, for team projects. Staffs proposal to implement this CHZM Hill recommendation was approved by the Fiscal Policy Committee in May as a part of the budget process, but was put on hold by the Executive Committee, along with the other personnel recommendations, to be considered on a case-by-case basis in the future. Minutes of the Executive Committee August 25, 1994 Page 5 The Directors may recall that when the formation of this group was considered by the Fiscal Policy Committee as part of the 1994-95 budget process, the new positions and the transfers were offset by deletions or changes in other Divisions for a net overall decrease of five positions and $113,664. The payroll cost reduction was approved in the 1994-95 budget, but the organizational changes were not. The payroll costs of the recommended group can be funded from the existing payroll budget and unfilled positions with no increase in the adopted 1994-95 budget total. Staff reported to the Computer Committee that Ernst &Young, the Directors' consultants for the ongoing evaluation of construction management and organizational issues, had been asked to review the staff report. Ernst & Young thinks such a group is a good idea and is consistent with their recommendations. Special Selection Committee Re Computers Recommendation. The Computer Committee is recommending that the Classification and Compensation Resolution be amended to add three positions [one Systems Engineer ($4,495 - $6,360), one Programmer/Analyst ($3,700 - $5,235) and one Programmer ($3,195 -$4,525)] to the Information Services Division for the formation of the Plant Automation Group, and deleting one position [Engineer ($4,495 -$6,360)] from the Engineering Department, Planning & Design Division, at no change in the 1994-95 salaries and wages budget, subject to a report by Ernst & Young and the Executive Subcommittee. Executive Subcommittee Action. At the Executive Subcommittee August 24th meeting, Committee members, Ernst &Young representatives and staff discussed the proposal. Although Ernst & Young supports the Plant Automation Group concept, and it is consistent with the direction of their overall recommendations, they reported that they cannot offer an unqualified opinion without a detailed study of the proposed new group, which they have not been engaged to do. Ernst & Young estimated that such a review could be done in two to three weeks at a cost of about $30,000. The Executive Subcommittee, therefore, authorized staff to issue a purchase order to Ernst & Young in an amount not to exceed $25,000, to conduct a study and submit a report on the proposed Formation of the Plant Automation Group. Ernst & Young indicated that they believed the work could be completed in time for the scheduled consideration of the matter by the Joint Boards at their meeting on September 14, 1994. Director Gullixson opposed the action. Minutes of the Executive Committee August 25, 1994 Page 6 Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee discussed the propriety of having consultants review staff recommendations during which it was pointed out that the General Manager had recommended the review by Ernst & Young. The General Manager explained his reasoning for his recommendations for a review of the computer automation proposals because of their importance in assisting in the operation of the treatment plants and complying with all regulatory requirements in carrying out the Districts' mission of public health and environmental protection. Following a discussion, the Executive Committee concurs with the recommendations and actions of the Special Selection Committee Re Computers and Executive Subcommittee, and recommends that the proposed Formation of the Plant Automation Group be placed on the September 14, 1994 agenda of the Joint Boards for consideration of approval, subject to receipt of a report from Ernst & Young on their review of the proposal. Director Mahoney stated his opposition to the engagement of a consultant to conduct a study of the recommendation. STATUS REPORT RE PHASE 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGEMENT FUNCTION IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION OF OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FUNCTIONS. Joint Chairman Cox reported that the Executive Subcommittee had received a status report from Ernst &Young on the status of Phase 2 Capital Projects Management Function Improvements Implementation and the Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance Functions at its August 24th meeting, and referred the Directors to the enclosed Subcommittee's August 24th meeting minutes for more detail. At the Joint Chairman's request, Larry Seigel and Michael Klein of Ernst &Young summarized the status of Phase 2 utilizing selected pages from the Capital Management Focused Improvement Project outline (white) attached to said minutes. The Committee members discussed the Phase 2 work with the Ernst & Young representatives but no action was taken since this was a status report only. CLOSED SESSION. The General Counsel reported on the need to convene in closed session to consider matters as set forth on the Committee's agenda and described the items and relevant authorizing code sections, whereupon the Committee convened into closed session, after which it reconvened in open session. Minutes of the Executive Committee August 25, 1994 Page 7 PHASE 3 OPERATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL STUDIES. At the August 10th Joint Board meeting, the Directors authorized the Executive Subcommittee to review the Phase 3 Work Plan for Additional Operational and Organizational Studies with Ernst & Young after the early Phase 2 work had commenced, and following that review to submit a recommendation to the Executive Committee on the operational and organizational issues that should be considered for further study in Phase 3. Following its review of the Subcommittee recommendation, the Executive Committee is to submit its recommendation to the Joint Boards for consideration. The enclosed Executive Subcommittee August 24th meeting minutes discusses this matter and includes a copy of the Ernst & Young letter (pink) dated July 25, 1994, regarding Phase 3 operational and organizational issues. Executive Subcommittee Recommendation. The Executive Subcommittee still has the Phase 3 work plan under review but, at this time, recommends that Addendum No. 2 to the professional services agreement with Ernst & Young to conduct a two-phase, independent review of the Districts' Capital Projects Management Function, be approved to add Phase 3, Task 4, Evaluation of Human Resources, for a total amount not to exceed $60,000, increasing the total compensation authorized for said professional services agreement from an amount not to exceed $235,000 to an amount not to exceed $295.000. Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee reviewed the proposal with Ernst & Young representatives and staff and concurs with the recommendation of the Executive Subcommittee. PROPOSED BOARD COMMITTEE RESTRUCTURING. Joint Chairman Cox noted that at the August 10th Joint Board meeting he had reported that he was considering a restructuring of the Board Committees. He stated that this is partially an outgrowth of the engineering projects/management practices review being conducted by Ernst & Young, and discussions with other Board members. The enclosed Memorandum Re Proposed Board Committee Restructuring (buff) from the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman, which details their recommendations, was then reviewed. Minutes of the Executive Committee August 25, 1994 Page 8 It is proposed that there be four Standing Committees in the Joint Administrative Organization as follows: Operations Committee: The Operations Committee is a new committee that combines the former Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee, the Select Committee to Advise the Staff, the Special Selection Committee Re Ocean Monitoring and the Ad Hoc Committee Re Service to Areas Outside the Districts. The proposed regular meeting date is the 1st Wednesday of each month. Engineering & Construction Committee: The Engineering & Construction Committee is a new committee that combines the former Engineering and Construction Committee, the Building Committee, and the Special Selection Committee Re Computers. The proposed regular meeting date is the 1st Thursday of each month. Finance & Personnel Committee: The Finance & Personnel Committee is a new committee that combines the former Fiscal Policy Committee and Personnel Committee. The proposed regular meeting date is the 3rd Wednesday of each month. Executive Committee: There is no proposed change in the Executive Committee from the current Committee makeup. The proposed regular meeting date is 4th Wednesday of each month. The Boards, the Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization, or an individual District Chair, and the Chair of a Standing Committee may appoint, from time to time, special or ad hoc committees to study and report on specific matters, after which the Committee would be dissolved. In addition to the Standing Committees, the Joint Chair plans to implement a Steering Committee comprised of the Joint Chair, the Vice Joint Chair and the chairs of the Operations, Engineering and Construction, and Finance and Personnel Standing Committees to assist in coordinating the flow of activities to the Committees and Boards; and to conduct the annual performance evaluation of the General Manager and review the General Manager's evaluations of Department Heads. Minutes of the Executive Committee August 25, 1994 Page 9 Finally, it is proposed that the current Joint Works Selection Committee (Joint Chair and Vice Joint Chair) responsibilities for selecting professional services consultants be transferred to the appropriate new Standing Committee responsible for the work under consideration. Executive Committee Recommendation, The Executive Committee concurs with the proposed Board Committee restructuring. The following actions are required for implementation beginning October 1, 1994: (a) Amend Resolution No. 87-51, Establishing Rules of Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the Districts, relative to restructuring of the Boards' Committees. (b) Amend Resolution No. 90-43, Establishing Policies and Procedures for the Selection and Procurement of Professional Engineering, Architectural, Environmental, Land Surveying and Construction Management Services, relative to transferring Joint Works Selection Committee responsibilities for selecting professional services consultants to the appropriate new Standing Committee of the Boards. (Copies of the proposed resolutions will be included with the supporting agenda material for the September 14, 1994 meeting of the Joint Boards.) ADJOURNMENT. The Executive Committee adjourned at approximately 7:55 p.m. I*pdoe'ymM *0052584.ecm County Sanitation Districts - of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE JULY 27, 1994-5:30 P.M. A regular meeting of the Executive Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California was held on July 27, 1994, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative Offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: Present J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Gary Streed, Director of Finance John C. Cox, Jr. Joint Chairman Blake P. Anderson, Director of Peer A. Swan Vice Joint Chairman & Engineering Chairman, District 14 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel A. B. Catlin Past Joint Chairman Margaret H. Nellor, Director of Technical Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Services William D. Mahoney Past Joint Chairman Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Fred Barrera Chairman, District 1 Maintenance Phil Sansone Chairman, District 5 Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of James A Wahner Chairman, District 6 Operations Barry Hammond Chairman, District 7 Charles Egigian Nichols, Conservation, Grace H. Winchell Chairman, District 11 Recycle & Reuse Manager Roger Stanton County Supervisor Mahin Talebi, Source Control Manager William Steiner County Supervisor Jim Wybenga, Source Control Staff OTHERS PRESENT: ABSENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Larry Seigel, Ernst & Young John Collins Chairman, District 2 Mike Klein, Ernst & Young Sal Sapien Chairman, District 3 Richard Bailey, California Department of John M. Gullixson Chairman, District 13 Toxics Substances Control .Joann Cola, U.S. EPA Frank Hubel, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Bill Preston, Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Chris Knap, The Register AF 10 Minutes of the Executive Committee July 27, 1994 Page 2 Approval of Minutes. At the May 25, 1994 meeting, the Committee approved the Minutes of the April 27, 1994 Committee Meeting; and at the June 22, 1994 meeting, the Committee approved the Minutes of the May 25, 1994 Committee Meeting. However, these approved actions were inadvertently omitted from the minutes of the May 25, and June 22 meetings, respectively. The Committee therefore reaffirmed the previous actions of approving the April 27, 1994 and May 25, 1994, Executive Committee Minutes. The minutes of the June 22, 1994, Executive Committee were also approved as drafted. Temporary Diversion of Stringfellow Wastewater (Request of State of California Environmental Protection Agency. Department of Toxics Substances Control►. At the April Executive Committee meeting, staff reported to the Directors on a planned temporary diversion of Stringfellow wastewater from the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) to the Districts' Wastehauler Disposal station as the result of a construction project being undertaken at the Districts' Plant No. 1 Influent Wastewater Diversion Structure. The Stringfellow Treatment Plant treats contaminated groundwater, which is pumped from the former Stringfellow disposal site, in Glen Avon, in Riverside County. In accordance with the conditions of the permit established by the Districts and the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), the treated effluent is analyzed on-site to ensure that it meets our ordinance standards prior to discharge. The treated water is transferred to trucks and transported 12 miles to a disposal station, located at Buchanan Street in the City of Riverside, which is connected to the SARI line. During its eight years of operation, the Stringfellow treatment plant has consistently produced wastewater which has met all of the Districts' discharge requirements for heavy metals and organics. As a condition of the authorization of the Stringfellow discharge, the Boards of Directors stipulated that the SARI line be diverted from the Districts' Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2. This measure was taken to assuage any public concern regarding the integrity of the effluent from Plant No. 1 which, in part, is used by the Orange County Water District to produce reclaimed water. Modifications (now estimated to tdke place in September at the Districts' Plant No. 1 headworks)will be made to the influent diversion structure. This facility receives the trunk sewers tributary to Plant No. 1 and routes the flows through a series of gates to either Plant No. 1 or Plant No. 2. The modifications will necessitate the blending of the influent Minutes of the Executive Committee July 27, 1994 Page 3 trunk sewers, including the SARI line. This will result in a percentage of the SARI line being treated at Plant No. 1 during all or a portion of the estimated 30-day construction period. To ensure that the Stringfellow wastewater is not discharged to Plant No. 1, according to the Boards' adopted policy, during this construction period, staff has previously advised SAWPA that the wastewater must be delivered by truck to the Districts' Wastehauler Station, which is located at the entrance of Plant No. 1 and is connected to a line which flows directly to Plant No. 2; and once the modifications at the headworks have been completed, and the SARI line is again diverted to Plant No. 2, the discharge of Stringfellow wastewater at the Buchanan Street disposal station will resume. The discharge from Stringfellow is approximately 100,000 gallons per day, or 20 truckloads per day using 5,000 gallon trucks. Staff reported that the State of California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxics Substances Control (DTSC), who is responsible for Stringfellow, has asked that the Districts reconsider the requirement to truck the wastes to Plant No. 1, and has requested to appear before the Executive Committee. Enclosed are copies of letters (buff) dated June 22, and June 30, 1994, from DTSC pertaining to their request; and a copy of the Districts' May 4, 1994 letter advising SAWPA of the diversion requirement. The Chairman recognized Mr. Richard Bailey of the California DTSC. Using an overhead projector, Mr. Bailey reviewed the history of Stringfellow, its consistent compliance with discharge requirements and the high quality and low volume of the discharge. He also reviewed the four options: discontinuing the discharge, which is unfeasible; temporary on- site storage, which is costly, estimated at $75,000, and for which there is insufficient area; discharge to Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts through the Chino Basin Municipal Water District, which they have inquired about but not received an answer; and trucking to the Districts' Plant No. 1, which they believe could cost $60,000 plus monitoring costs, would be a potential safety hazard due to the amount of trucking, and which would require a lengthy change order process for the Corps of Engineers. Mr. Bailey, therefore, requested a temporary suspension of the Districts' requirement for diversion of the SARI to Plant No. 2 during the interim construction of Plant No. 1 diversion facilities modifications. Mr. Bailey then answered several questions regarding the clean-up progress at Stringfellow and the long term alternatives. In response to questions from Committee members, staff advised that temporary suspension of the diversion requirement would not affect the Districts' 301(h) NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit, or impact how the treatment plants are operated, and that the Orange County Water District is not concerned with the Stringfellow discharge. I Minutes of the Executive Committee July 27, 1994 Page 4 Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee recommends that the Boards' requirement that the Santa Ana River Interceptor flows carrying pretreated wastewater discharged from the Stringfellow waste disposal site be diverted from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2 for treatment, be temporarily suspended to allow treatment at Plant No. 1 during construction modifications being performed at the Plant No. 1 Influent Wastewater Diversion Structure pursuant to Job No. P1-38-2, Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1. Director Stanton requested that his opposition to the action be made a matter of record. Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on July 20th and considered several items of business. Enclosed is a copy (green) of the Committee's draft meeting minutes. Following are the recommended action items: (a) Extension of Agreement with Public Financial Management for Interim Financial Advisory Services. The Boards have previously engaged the firm of Public Financial Management Inc., (PFM) to provide transitional financial advisory services to the staff and Boards through July 1, 1994. PFM is working with staff and the Fiscal Policy Committee in preparing financial program manuals and the Committee recommends extension of the agreement to complete the work. Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendation. That Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 67642, with PFM, be authorized, extending their services through September 30, 1994, at no increase in the maximum authorized compensation of$50,000.00. Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the Fiscal Policy Committee. Minutes of the Executive Committee July 27, 1994 Page 5 (b) Approval of Reallocation of Certain Capital Improvements Financed by the 1990-92 Series "C" COPs. Districts 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 11 have been funding and constructing certain facilities pursuant to an Agreement for Acquisition and Construction dated July 1, 1992, in connection with the $98,500,000 Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series "C" Certificates of Participation (COPs). The Series "C" project funds have been allocated to each of the Districts based on expectations of construction projects and timing estimated prior to July 1, 1992. Since that time, as might be expected, a number of projects have experienced changes due to low project bids and project rescheduling. Federal tax laws generally require that the funds received from the COPs must be spent within two years to avoid having to calculate and pay "arbitrage rebate" to the federal treasury. Under the two-year exception rule, a rigid test applies requiring that each District spend project funds pursuant to specified percentages in six-month increments, in accordance with the District allocations specified under the Acquisition and Construction Agreement. At the June Fiscal Policy Committee meeting, the Committee authorized staff to engage Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (special counsel) to review with staff whether District No. 11 will comply with the two-year spending test, (because project delays have resulted in reduced construction expenditures) and to review the potential requirements for reallocating Series "C" COP project costs among the participating Districts to ensure that 100% of proceeds have been spent prior to September 1, 1994, for purposes of calculating arbitrage rebate. This reallocation would be similar to an action taken for District No. 5 Series "B" project costs in 1993, and will have no cost impact on the other Districts. Special counsel and staff have completed a review of Series "C" project funds for compliance with the two-year spending test, and have concluded that by reallocating project costs among the participating Districts, 100% of Series "C" project funds will be spent by September 1, 1994, in compliance with the two-year spending test. The two draft Resolutions attached to the Fiscal Policy Committee minutes for Reallocation of Certain Improvements Financed by the 1990-92 Series"C" COPs will accomplish the reallocation of project costs as described above. It was noted that when presented to the Joint Boards of Directors in August, separate copies of attached Resolution C-1 (tan)will be submitted for District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7. The second attached Resolution C-2 (buff), pertains only to District 11. Minutes of the Executive Committee July 27, 1994 Page 6 Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendation. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends approval of the Resolutions for Adjustment of Shares of Various Districts of the Cost of Certain Improvements to Joint Facilities Pertaining to 1990-92 Series "C" Certificates of Participation by Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 11. Executive Committee Recommendation. This action was approved in principle by the Executive Committee on June 22, 1994. The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the Fiscal Policy Committee. Consideration of Executive Subcommittee Report. The Executive Subcommittee met on June 23, July 21 and July 26, 1994. Enclosed are draft copies (stone) of the Committee's meeting minutes. Joint Chairman Cox reported on the Subcommittee's review of the Districts' Capital Project Management Process being conducted by Ernst & Young, and introduced Mr. Larry Seigel and Mr. Michael Klein of Ernst & Young who reviewed their Phase 1 Findings and Recommendations (including the Phase 1 Immediate Implementation Priority Items), their proposed Phase 2 Review of the Districts' Capital Project Management Process, and their Phase 3 Operational and Organizational Review Work Plan. Copies of the four relevant documents are enclosed with the Executive Subcommittee Minutes. The Committee entered into a lengthy question and answer session pertaining to the consultants findings and recommendations, and how the Phase 2 Improvement Team would function and interact with the Executive Subcommittee. Discussion then focused on Phase 3. Considerations included whether some of the Phase 3 items should be done concurrently with Phase 2, whether all proposed items should be studied, and the priorities of the proposed Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance and the Evaluation of Technical Services. Following the discussion, it was moved, seconded and duly carried that consideration of the items listed below under Executive Committee Recommendations, which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which require action at this time be approved pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2), be added to the Committee's agenda. Y Minutes of the Executive Committee July 27, 1994 Page 7 Executive Committee Recommendations. The Executive Committee recommends: (a) That the sixteen recommendations of the Ernst & Young Review of the Capital Project Management Process be approved; and that staff be authorized and directed to proceed immediately with implementation of the priority items identified by Ernst & Young for immediate implementation as items 1, 4, 6, 8, and 11. (Note that staff reported that it had already begun implementation of these recommendations and submitted the enclosed July 27th memorandum [green tint] on the implementation status. It was also noted that Phase 2 may further complement work on these items.) (b) That Addendum No. 1 to the professional services agreement with Ernst &Young to conduct a two-phase independent review of the Districts' Capital Projects Management Function, be approved to add the Phase 2 Review of the Districts' Capital Project Management Process, for an amount not to exceed $105,000 (it was noted that the Ernst & Young budget for Phase 2 was $95,988, however, the Executive Subcommittee recommended that the authorization be fixed at an amount not to exceed $105,000 in the event the Subcommittee deems it appropriate to request limited additional work as part of Phase 2. Said additional work shall be authorized only upon direction of the Subcommittee), and to conduct an Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance Functions, as set forth as Item 1 in the Ernst &Young Phase 3 recommendations,for a total amount not to exceed $45,000, increasing the total compensation authorized by said professional services agreement from an amount not to exceed $85,000 to an amount not to exceed $235,000. (c) That the Executive Subcommittee be authorized to review the Phase 3 Work Plan with Ernst&Young and staff after the early Phase 2 work and, following that review, to submit a recommendation on Phase 3 to the Executive Committee at its regular meeting on September 28, 1994; and the Executive Committee to submit a recommendation to the Joint Boards for consideration at their regular meeting on October 12, 1994. Excess Capacity Charges for Local Public Agency Facilities. The Districts' Director of Technical Services, Margaret Nellor, reviewed the issue of Excess Capacity Charges for local public agency groundwater treatment facilities, using the enclosed Ordinance Requirements outline (gray). Minutes of the Executive Committee July 27, 1994 Page 8 The Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations (Ordinance) provide that new developments or projects must pay a one-time sewer connection fee that pays for the sewerage system capital facilities capacity to service the development or project. The charge is currently $2,350 for residential units and $470/1000 sq. ft. for non-residential developments. The Ordinance recognizes that the demand placed on the Districts' sewerage system by certain unique projects cannot always be calculated within the typical connection fee formula parameters and, thus, provides that new developments or projects which require substantial sewerage facilities capacity may be subject to an excess capacity charge in an amount and method to be determined by the Districts' Boards of Directors on a case-by-case basis. However, with the exception of District No. 13, the Ordinance also provides that, except as may be provided by an individual district, there will be no capital facilities connection charges assessed to local government agencies for connecting directly or indirectly to the Districts' sewerage system; but a connection permit must be obtained. The Ordinance provision exempting local government agencies from connection fees did not envision developments or projects being undertaken by a local public agency that would place a significant demand on the Districts' sewerage system. Typically, local agencies connect public buildings to the system, such as a school, city hall, office building, maintenance yard and the like. However, there are currently a number of planned and proposed local agency public projects for groundwater and waste treatment facilities that may place significant demands on the Districts' system. These projects are in the Cities of Anaheim, Garden Grove, Irvine, Santa Ana, Tustin, Westminster and Yorba Linda. There are three projects on which we have sufficiently detailed information to determine that they will discharge a combined flow of 2.19 mgd to our sewerage system. The first of these projects to be operational will be the Tustin Desalter. The Orange County Water District(OCWD) and the City of Tustin are jointly developing this project which is designed to treat over 3,000 acre-feet of groundwater per year(2.7 million gallons per day)from three currently inactive wells located in the City of Tustin. The desalter, which is expected to begin operation in May 1995, will utilize a reverse osmosis membrane treatment system to remove nitrate from the City of Tustin's wells. As a by-product of the treatment process, approximately 365,000 gpd of brine wastewater will be generated. OCWD and the City of Tustin have requested permission to discharge the brine wastewater to the Districts' sewerage system. The calculated total excess capacity charge for the three projects ranges between $5.5 and 6.4 million. The Tustin Desalter project is approximately $1 million. There is one other option that could reduce the charge by as much as 80%. This involves the direct discharge of the brine wastewater to the Districts' ocean outfall through a sewer constructed by the OCWD. In this case, the capacity charge would be based on the capital requirements of the Districts' ocean outfall system. However, this option is not easily or Minutes of the Executive Committee July 27, 1994 Page 9 immediately implementable prior to the start-up of the Tustin Desalter because it would require authorization by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and a modification of our ocean discharge permit. Although the Tustin Desalter is in District No. 7, and the Ordinance provides that each district decide such issues on a case-by-case basis, the capacity charge issue is really an issue that affects all districts, and there are at least nine similar projects pending in other districts. There are basically three options for excess capacity charges for local public agencies' water treatment facilities. 1. Do not assess an excess capacity charge for any government agency's water treatment facility which is connected to the Districts' sewerage system. Under this option, the rates of other users-would have to be increased to make up for the public facility subsidy. 2. Assess an excess capacity charge for any government agency's water treatment facility which is connected to the Districts' sewerage system. 3. Assess an excess capacity charge on a case-by-case basis for any government agency's water treatment facility which is connected to the Districts' sewerage system. Staff sought direction from the Committee and noted that although each of the planned projects discussed herein may primarily benefit a local community, the projects are sufficiently widespread that an argument can be made that they benefit the community-at-large and, thus, it could follow that a similar argument could be made to exempt the projects from the Districts' capital facilities connection charge because the sewerage system ratepayers are also the water system ratepayers. There are possible exceptions such as the Lenain Water Treatment Plant. Further, it has to be realized that Sanitation Districts' charges to all other users of the sewerage system would have to be raised to make up for the subsidy to these public facilities. Attached is a more detailed staff report (salmon) addressing this issue. Following considerable discussion, it was the consensus of the Committee that the local projects should not be subsidized by other Districts' ratepayers and that they should be charged connection fees (Option 3 above) as part of the overall project costs, to be amortized over the life of the project and paid by the users that directly benefit from the project. Minutes of the Executive Committee July 27, 1994 Page 10 Also discussed was the potential benefits of constructing a separate brine line that all such groundwater clean-up projects could connect to and discharge directly to the Districts' ocean ouffall system, thus avoiding both the capital and operating costs of unnecessary treatment. Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee recommends: (a) Approval in concept of a policy to assess an excess capacity charge for any government agency's water treatment facility which is connected to the Districts' sewerage system; and, (b) Approval in concept that the fees collected as excess capacity charges from a governmental agency for the connection of a water treatment facility to the Districts' sewerage system are to be held in reserve in accordance with a proposed Boards' policy that designates the revenues received for future appropriation related to the construction of a brine line for separate discharge to the ocean through the Districts' outfall system, if all regulatory permit approvals are received, or, upon failure to receive said approvals, the funds may be expended in the same manner as other connection fees collected for any Districts' capital facilities project; and, (c) That the staff and General Counsel be authorized and directed to draft proposed amendments to the Districts. Capital Facilities Connection Charge Ordinance to implement said policies for consideration by the Executive Committee and Boards of Directors at future meetings. Directors Catlin, Griffin, Wahner and Winchell requested that their opposition to the proposed policy pertaining to reserving funds for construction of a brine line [(b) above] be made a matter of record. Capital Facilities Connection Charge Ordinance Issues, The Districts' Director of Engineering, Blake Anderson, reported that capital facilities connection charges are collected pursuant to Districts' Ordinance to fund the construction of collection, treatment and disposal facilities necessary to serve new development. The fees (currently $2,350 for each residential unit and $470 per 1,000 square feet of commercial or industrial property) are collected, in most cases, for the Districts by the Cities at the time the building permits are issued. The fees are collected for all development which discharges to the Districts' sewerage facilities. With one exception (in District No. 13) local public facilities are exempt (see preceding agenda item). Minutes of the Executive Committee July 27, 1994 Page 11 Recently, an appeal regarding a self-storage development was granted by the District No. 7 Board of Directors. The development included a large building consisting of self-storage rentals with no plumbing fixtures or connections to the sewer. Also included was a manager's apartment and a common office/rest room facility. The developer proposed to pay the residential charge of $2,350 for the manager's unit and a second $2,350 for the office/rest room (based on a charge of $470/1000 square feet, minimum charge of$2,350), treating the apartment and office/rest room as separate buildings. The apartment and office/rest room were separated from the self storage units by a two-hour fire wall, recognized by the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and many cities and regulatory agencies which adopt the UBC as a building separation. The City of Newport Beach found this two-hour fire wall to constitute such a separation and did determine that the manager's residence and office were a building distinct from the adjoining self-storage facilities. Had the self-storage development within District No. 7 included two physically separated buildings, one containing the manger's residence and the office area where the sewer service is provided and one consisting of the unsewered self-storage area, then the self-storage units would clearly have been exempt from the capital facilities connection charge. Exemption by the fire wall separation seems consistent with the Ordinance, however, it is not specifically allowed under the Ordinance. For this reason, staff referred this policy decision to the Board for a determination. Had the Board not agreed with the definition, the connection fee would have been approximately $22,000 for the property, rather than $4,700. The capital facilities connection charge is included in the Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance of each of the nine Districts. Mr. Anderson observed that the issue of non-sewered self-storage units, as described above, can best be addressed by looking at the nine Districts as a whole and formulating a policy that addresses the internal inconsistency within our existing connection charge program represented by the District No. 7 appeal: Situation X: Two buildings separated by a three-foot breeze way? No problem—this is an administrative matter and we will charge connection fees for only the sewered building. Situation Y: Two buildings separated by a common wall with a two-hour fire rating? A problem—this is not an administrative matter because the Ordinance does not provide staff with the discretion to not charge fees for the entire foot print of such a building and must, therefore, be referred to the District's Board as an appeal decision. Minutes of the Executive Committee July 27, 1994 Page 12 Mr. Anderson further reported that beyond the problem with unsewered self-storage facilities, there is the issue of warehouse buildings. Today, if a warehouse has employee rest room facilities that are connected to the public sewer, then a District connection charge of $470 per 1000 square feet is levied at the time that a connection permit application is received by the local sewering authority. On its face, this policy may appear to be unfair. Why charge a fee for capital facilities impacts for warehousing space that has no apparent industrial or high volume flows associated with it? Actually, this is a well thought out policy that has remained in effect for over 20 years. The reasoning behind the policy is that once connection fees are levied, no additional fees for capital facilities impacts are again collected on a particular piece of property. In the future, the use of the building may (and often times does) change during the life of the building. Floor space may be converted to manufacturing or some other type of use over time and, therefore, the sewage flow may increase substantially. The existing policy of collecting fees for the square footage of all non-residential properties avoids a future collection problem. Having already collected the fees, the Districts' capital improvement funds are already in our hands. Mr. Anderson observed that the Directors may wish to direct staff to re-examine this policy to determine if it continues to fairly and equitably collect capital facilities fees and whether a change in policy can be effectively administered. Basically, the practical question is this: Is there a method available for the Districts or the local building authority to know when there is a change in the sewer use for a building formerly permitted as a warehouse, and can additional capital facilities fees be easily collected at that time? There are other issues that have emerged in recent years including connection fee modifications for senior citizen housing, low income housing and local public facilities that place a significant demand on the Districts' sewerage system. The Boards may wish to reconsider these issues as well. The Directors of District No. 7 approved the specific appeal and exempted the collection of the capital facilities connection charge for the portion of the building not connected to the Districts' sewerage system and separated by a two-hour fire wall, recognized by the local Building Official. It was the consensus of Directors at the Joint Board meeting that consideration of such an exemption for similar buildings by all Districts may be appropriate and staff was directed to agendize the issue for discussion. Staff, therefore, recommended that the Executive Committee consider the following actions pertaining to the capital facilities connection fee provisions of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance: (a) Find that sewered and non-sewered portions of buildings separated by two-hour fire walls, as approved by the local Building Official pursuant to the UBC constitute Minutes of the Executive Committee July 27, 1994 Page 13 separate buildings for the purpose of calculating connection fees; and that staff be authorized to interpret the Ordinance in accordance with this finding. (b) Direct staff to study the existing Capital Facilities Connection Fee Ordinance provisions to determine equitability of fees, and to draft appropriate changes to the Ordinance for future consideration by the Boards; and, further, authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit consulting proposals to assist in said study, for consideration by the Boards. Following a discussion, it was the consensus of the Executive Committee that a study of the connection fee ordinance provisions should be conducted before the Directors consider any policy changes. Executive Committee Recommendations. The Executive Committee recommends that the staff be authorized and directed to study the existing Capital Facilities Connection Fee Ordinance provisions to determine equitability of fees and to draft appropriate changes to the Ordinance for future consideration by the Boards; and further, that the Selection Committee be authorized to solicit consulting proposals to assist in said study, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. Btosolids Manaaement Program. As part of the Districts' biosolids management program, we have contracted with Pima Gro Systems (PGS) to take approximately 75% of our daily biosolids production for their disposition. PGS is currently operating a composting operation in Thermal, California, under the terms of an agreement with Geraldine Ibanez, an Allottee, on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation land in Thermal. Several other contractors also operate on the site processing biosolids from other POTWs. The processed biosolids, meeting state and federal criteria for safe recycling, is then removed from the site and recycled in the Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside County areas. Staff briefed the Committee on the status of a tribal dispute that has developed over the processing site which has been joined by the Greenpeace organization in an attempt to make an issue of it. There is also an issue of groundwater protection on the site. The U.S. EPA, Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and RWQCB are also involved in attempting to resolve the dispute. Adjournment. The Executive Committee adjourned at approximately 8:30 p.m. J:W pdoc'VmWmW727NWcm County Sanitalion Districts Revised: 8.25-94 of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127 a 108"Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 9272SA127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF SPECIAL SELECTION COMMITTEE RE COMPUTERS MEETING DATE AUGUST 17, 1994 - 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Special Selection Committee re Computers of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on August 17, 1994, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative office. The roll was called and a quorum declared present as follows: Directors Present: Others Present: John Cox, Joint Chairman Jerry Boyle, CH2M Hill Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chairman Alan Carrie, CH2M Hill Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chairman William D. Mahoney, Past Joint Chairman Directors Absent: Staff Present: A. B. "Buck" Catlin, Past Joint Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Blake P. Anderson, Director of Engineering Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Robert J. Ooten, Asst. Director of Operations Steve Hovey, Manager of Information Services Stuart Severn, Associate Engineer Gerald Jones, Instrumentation Field Supervisor APPROVAL OF MINUTES. The minutes of the Special Selection Committee re Computers meeting of April 28, 1994 were approved as submitted. PLANT AUTOMATION STATUS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. At the April Special Selection Committee meeting, the Directors considered and approved a staff report based upon the work done to date by CH2M Hill on Job No. J-31, Expansion of Computer and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2. The Committee recommended, and the Boards subsequently approved, the purchase of two Model 4700A VAX computers and a site license and maintenance agreement for CRISP/32 software to improve the plant monitoring capability and to implement computerized plant control. Minutes of Special Selection August 17, 1994 Committee Re Computers One of the results of the April Special Selection Committee and Executive Committee meetings was a one-page summary of the budget for "Computerization of Plant Monitoring and Automation." This original schedule is enclosed (lavender) for the Committee's reference. An updated schedule (blue), which shows the Committee's past actions and the recommendations approved at this month's meeting, is also enclosed. Representatives of CH2M Hill and staff presented a slide presentation summarizing the enclosed staff report (white) which briefly reviews the history of this J-31 project and discusses three recommendations to continue our progress toward plant automation: factory configuration and testing of the CRISP/32 software and the DEC hardware, proposed Addendum No. 3 to the CH2M Hill Job No. J-31, and standardization of the Modicon Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC). After a lengthy question and answer session with considerable discussion amongst the Committee members, representatives of CH2M Hill and staff, the Committee voted to approve the three recommendations and to forward them to the Executive Committee for consideration. The Committee summarized their discussion and recommendations for this item as: A logical extension of the CH2M Hill work done to date to analyze and resolve the plant-automation needs; A modular approach to satisfying those needs by implementing incremental solutions; Providing the option for plant automation to include data handling, process monitoring and process control; Providing standards for the appearance and operation of all of the automated processes to facilitate operational and maintenance needs; Constituting an initial step in revisiting and updating the 2020 VISION Master Plan - Volume 5 for "Computer Control, Monitoring and Data Handling Systems." -2- Minutes of Special Selection August 17, 1994 Committee Re Computers Recommended Actions: Factory Confiauration of Criso/32 Software and DEC Hardware The Committee concurs with the recommendation that Square D Company be authorized to perform the factory configuration and testing of the CRISP/32 software and DEC hardware. Square D Company is the provider of the software and is best able to install and customize that software to meet the Districts' unique operating and hardware requirements. The proposed agreement for system integration and factory testing includes payment provisions based upon satisfactory completion of the testing. The integration and testing services for each plant are proposed to be $42,412 for a total not to exceed $84,824 plus applicable taxes. Should the Directors decide, for any reason, not to go forward with the installation at Plant 2, the maximum cost would be $42,412 plus taxes for the work for Plant 1. These costs were identified as items 9 and 12 on the lavender schedule and were estimated to cost $110,000. Addendum No. 3 to Job No. J-31. Expansion of Comouter Control System The Committee further recommends the approval of Addendum No. 3 to Job No. J-31, Expansion of Computer and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2. The detailed Scope of Work (salmon) and the CH2M Hill Proposal (green) are attached to the staff report. Addendum No. 3 is made up of two parts; traditional design engineering, proposed in an amount not to exceed $532,300, and software integration services, which will customize the CRISP/32 software to meet our specific needs, proposed in an amount not to exceed $785,900, a total increase of$1,318,200. The software integration services will make it possible for all existing and proposed use of computers for monitoring and/or controlling our treatment plants to have a uniform format. This will make it possible for our operations, maintenance and engineering staff members to readily use and maintain the dozens of computer-based systems that will monitor and control our wastewater treatment facilities now and in the future. The traditional engineering services estimated costs are shown on line 7 of the "Computerization of Plant Monitoring and Automation" schedule ( ae, •• blue), while the mere software automation services are included in the amounts shown on lines 14 and 46 12, 16 and 18 for a total estimate of$1,850,000 $1,340,000. Approval of proposed Addendum No. 3 will increase the total authorized contract not-to- exceed amount to $2,060,348 including direct expenses, overhead and fixed profit as shown on the following table. -3- Minutes of Special Selection August 17, 1994 Committee Re Computers PROPOSED ADDENDUM N0.3 TRADITIONAL TOTAL PROPOSED EXISTING DESIGN SOFTWARE PROPOSED AMENDED AGREEMENT ENGINEERING INTEGRATION ADDITION AGREEMENT Engineering Services,direct $369,W4 $436,280 $646,300 $1,082.580 $1,451,644 labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 173%,not to exceed Direct Expenses,at cost, 36,000 49.900 71.400 121.300 157.300 not to exceed Subconsullants,not to 292575 0 0 0 292.575 exceed Fixed Profit �509 46120 682W 1143320 15�829 Total Contract,not to 79# 2,148 532300 78 900 $1318.200 2060348 exceed Standardization re Modicon Programmable Logic Controllers The final recommendation made in accordance with recommendations from the CH2M Hill study results and the recently completed Ernst & Young review of construction management practices relates to standardization. Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) have replaced wiring and relay logic systems for computerized monitoring or control applications. PLCs are distributed throughout the plant and communicate with a much larger supervisory computer which provides system-wide operations interface and process data manipulation. The PLC performs the basic unit or process control function. CH2M Hill has recommended the Districts standardize on the Modicon PLC. There are already approximately 50 of these installed in various processes within the plants and at outlying pump stations, and staff has been very impressed with their performance and reliability. Standardization simplifies maintenance, inventory management, operations, programming and training requirements. Ernst & Young has recommended that, "Where possible, the Districts should avoid subjecting high technology computer projects to the requirements of the public works process," and that "hardware specifications should be more narrowly written." A decision to standardize on the Modicon Programmable Logic Controller complies with the recommendations of both of these consultants. If the recommended action is approved, then future plans and specifications will require use of Modicon PI-Cs. and, thus, contractors will not be able to substitute another manufacturer's product. -4- Minutes of Special Selection August 17, 1994 Committee Re Computers FORMATION OF PLANT AUTOMATION GROUP As part of the study project known as Addendum 1 to Job J-31, completed in March 1994, the Districts' engineering consultants, CH2M Hill, reviewed the status of the existing SCADA systems, the future systems expansion needs, and the organizational support needed to implement and maintain these systems. This CH2M Hill report has previously been reviewed with this Committee, the Executive Committee, and the Joint Boards. Section 6 of the CH2M Hill report addresses the organization and skills necessary to implement and maintain the monitoring, control and information systems of the Districts. A copy of this section, which proposes a special process control group, is enclosed (goldenrod). This proposal and recommendation was considered by a special staff interdepartmental task force in preparation for the 1994-95 Personnel Recommendations. After considerable study, debate and discussion, the staff task force and executive management staff concluded that the Information Services Division should be expanded to assume responsibility for the plant automation, monitoring and control computer systems so that all computer activities are centralized in one division. The skill sets needed for this growing function need to be integrated and unified for best results. This new"group" will need to be on call 24 hours a day, have a close working relationship with Operations, Maintenance and Engineering, provide software development for process control, and manage or oversee the development and implementation of various outside services contracts. The group would utilize existing staff from other divisions as needed for team projects. Regular cross-departmental staff meetings (now occurring) and other methods will be employed to keep all relevant staff talking (and being heard) as our plant automation hardware and software systems are designed, constructed, used and maintained. Staffs proposal to implement this CH2M Hill recommendation was approved by the Fiscal Policy Committee in May as a part of the budget process, but was put on hold by the Executive Committee, along with the other personnel change recommendations, to be considered one-by-one in the future. A more detailed explanation of the proposal is included in the enclosed revised staff report (tan). The Directors may recall that when the formation of this group was considered by the Fiscal Policy Committee as part of the 1994-95 budget process, the new positions and the transfers were offset by deletions or changes in other divisions for a net Districts- wide decrease of five positions and $113,664. The payroll reduction was included in the -5- Minutes of Special Selection August 17, 1994 Committee Re Computers 1994-95 budget, but the organizational changes were not. The payroll costs of the recommended group can be funded from the existing payroll budget and unfilled positions with no increase in the adopted 1994-95 budget total. Staff reported that Ernst & Young, the Directors' consultants for the ongoing evaluation of construction management and organizational issues, had been asked to review the staff report prior to the meeting. Ernst & Young told staff that they thought such a group was a good idea and was consistent with their recommendations. Ernst & Young also indicated that they would like to evaluate the proposed group's charter and reporting relationships in their Phase III work, but that the size, skills and areas of expertise proposed seemed to be appropriate. The Committee asked that the formation of a plant automation group be included in the Executive Subcommittee agenda for discussion at their scheduled meeting on Wednesday, August 24, 1994. The Committee discussed the training and travel and office remodeling costs included in the revised staff report. Upon further review, analysis and explanation, the Committee determined that the proposed training and travel costs were really a part of the one-time implementation costs of the CRISP/32 process control software. Funds for the remodeling costs of existing office space were noted as already being provided in the approved 1994-95 CORF Budget for miscellaneous improvements; thus no action by the Committee was required. These costs should properly be capitalized and have been included on the one-page summary entitled "Capitalization of Plant Monitoring and Automation Improvements Budget Summary" (blue) enclosed. Recommended Action: The Committee recommends amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, adding one Systems Engineer ($4,495 - $6,360). one Programmer/Analyst ($3,700 - $5,235) and one Programmer ($3,195 - $4,525) to the Information Services Division for the Plant Automation Group and deleting one Engineer ($4,495 - $6,360) position from the Engineering Department, Planning & Design Division, providing the approved 1994-95 salaries and wages budget is not increased and that the proposal is endorsed by Ernst & Young and the Executive Subcommittee at the meeting to be held on August 24, 1994. -6- Minutes of Special Selection August 17, 1994 Committee Re Computers FUTURE MEETINGS: The Committee discussed the urgency of potential items for consideration at future meetings and the impact of a proposed reorganization of Board Committees. The consensus was that the next meeting should be held Thursday, September 29, 1994, to consider hardware upgrade alternatives for the Laboratory Information Management System. ADJOURNMENT: The Special Selection Committee re Computers adjourned at 8:30 p.m. GGS:ahh REF:J MyGocYnknnelsel.comvninsB 94 Enclosures -7- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS it ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 108A4 ELUS AVENUE FO 90.0127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,UL FOaNIA 92726.e127 p"1952-2411 June 2, 1994 COMPUTERIZATION OF PLANT MONITORING&AUTOMATION IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET SUMMARY PERKID DESCRIPTION PLANT PLANT TOTAL COMPLETED WORK 1990 1. Install HBO Computer Monitoring Systems and fiber optic network. $2.10 M $2.00 M S4.10 M 1994 Presently monitors 15%Plant l and 30%Plant 2 1993 2. Job J31 awarded to CH2.MHill.Expansion of Existing Computer $0.19 M $0.01 M $0.20 M Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2. 1994 3. J31 Addendum No.1,HSO and Control System,Review and $0.03 M $0.02 M $0.05 M Evaluation a t`': -'W.° :TOTAL.COSTOF COMPLETED WORK' A"Z327 E2:OStv1? :'t34j.35:M FUTURE AUTHOR17ED WORK 1994E 14. Correlation afre"Ining J31 System 22 'lin and Implementation $0.20 M $023 M $0.43 M FUTURE PROPOSED WORK(Preliminary Estimated Costs for Budgeting Purposes) July S. Purchase CRISP Software Site License,both Plants(Per#3) $022 M $022 M SOA4 M 994 6. Purchase Digital Equipment VAX Computer Equip.(Per#3) $0.40 M - $OAO M August 7. J31 Addendum Nc.3(Currently under evaluation by SIa#and not $0.40 M $0.40 M $0.80 M 1994 yet proposed to Boards): a. Develop integration standards b. Design plan to modernize and renovate existing obsolete and high maintenance instrumentation c. Automate report generation of Daily,Weekly,Monthly&Yearly Reports it. Miscellaneous Plant automation projects including life cycle cost analysis(See#10-16) B. Install Additional Fiber Optic Network and Communications Equip $0.70 M $0.70 M $1A0 M Sept. 9. Computer System Setup and Factory Test(Re#5&6) $0.05 M - E9.95 M 1994 Ongoing 10. Upgrade and consolidate existing PLC's(Per#7) $1.00 M $0.90 M $1.90 M Work thru 11. Purchase Digital Equipment VAX Computer Equip.(Per#2) - $0.30M $0,30M 1996 12 Computer System Setup and Factory Test(Re If 11) - $0.06 M $0.06 M 13. Replace Ocean Ouball Booster Station DCS(Per 92&7) - $0.60 M $0.60 M 14. Automate Plant 1 Headworks(Per IF 7) $0.65 M - $0.66 M 15. Integrate digester#5-#10 controls into existing PLC(Per if 7) $0.39 M - 50.39 M 1S. Replace and modify secondary treatment process existing SO.20 M $1.00 M 5120 M instrumentation and control systems(Per#7) 17.151/6 Contingency Fund $0.63 M $0.66 M � '*'^ . ': : - TOTAL COST FOR PROPOSED FUTURE WORK: - ` $4.84M $S.OZM .$9.91'M, GRAND TOTAL COMPLETED AND PROPOSED WORK AT BOTH PLANTS'. ' $14.26'Mi COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Revised August 17, 199A me44 ELLIS AVENUE June 2. I994 ep a0a all, FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALROAmA 927a1ef 27 O1a1962-0an COMPUTERIZATION OF PLANT MONITORING It AUTOMATION IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET SUMMARY PERIOD PLANT PLANT TOTAL COMPLETED WORK M=Millions 1990 1. Install HSO Computer Monitoring System and Ober optic network. E2AO M $ZW M $4.10 M 1994 Presently mordom 15%Plant 1 and 30%Plant 2 1993 2. Job J31 awarded to CH2MHi11,Expansion of Existing Computer $0.19 M $0,01 M $0.20 M Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2. 1994 3. J31 Addendum No.1,HSO and Control System,Review and f0.03 M $0.02 M $0.05 M Evaluation TOTAL COST OF COMPLETED WORK E2.32 M $203 M $4.35 M FUTURE AUTHORIZED WORK 1990.6 4. Completion of remaining J31 System Design and Implementation E0.20 M $0,23 M $0.43 M July S. Purchase CRISP Software SR.License,both Plants E0.22 M E0.ZZ M f9.44 M 1994 6. Purchase Dgial Equipment.VAX Computer Equipment E0.a0 M SO.40 M FUTURE PROPOSED WORK(Preliminary Estimated Costs for Budgeting Pur ses August 7. J31 Addendum No.3 $0.30 M $0.23 M $0.53 M 1994 a. Devecp integration standards b. Design plan to modernize and renovate existing obsolete and high maintenance instrumentation c. Miscellaneous Plant automation projects including life cycle cost analysis 6. Install Additional Fiber Optic Network and Communications Equip $0.70 M $0.70 M $1.40 M Sept 9. Computer System Setup aril Factory Test(Re 6 5 6 6) $0.04 M $0JM M 1994 10. Remodel Office 8 Development Lab.for Plant Automation Group $0.27 M $0.27 M. 1994-5 11. Indial CRISP/32 Training for Staff $0.09 M $0.09 M Ongoing 12. Upgrade and consolidate PLC's(Per a 7) $0.85 M $0.76 M 5"0 M Work -Integration Services CH2MHill SOASM E0.12M th u 1996 13. Purchase Digital Equipment VAX Computer Equip.(Per 6 2) E0.24 M $0.24 M 14. Computer System Setup and!Factory Test(Re 611) $0.04 M SO."M 15. Replace Ocean Outfall Booster Station DCS(Per O 237) $0.60M $0.60M 16. Automate Plant 1 Headworks,Design(Per N 7) $0.45 M $0.65 M -Integration Services CH2MHIII 30.20 M 17. Integrate digester it 5-10 controls into existing PLC(Per f 7) $0.39 M $0.39 M 16. Replace and modifysecondary treatment process existing S0.20 M 50.70 M $1.20 M instrumentation and control systems(Per a 7) $0.W M -Integration Senecas CH2MHill 19. 12.5%Contingency Fund S0.63 M ;;$066M . 3129 M TOTAL COST FOR PROPOSED FUTURE WORK $5.09 M E4.62 M E9.91 M GRAND TOTAL COMPLETED AND PROPOSED WORK AT BOTH PLANTS $14.26 M Ongoing 1 20. Maximum Staffing(Already Budgeted) 1 $0.31 Section 6 System Support Overview of Section This section addresses control system support, that is the organization and skills necessary to implement and maintain the monitoring, control, and information systems of the Districts. Recently, the Districts formed a Process Control Task Force to discuss this topic. The District Task Force identified several critical issues during their meetings, including the following: • There are various Districts staff in several different departments who have some common areas of expertise which address some of the needed skills to support the Districts' control systems; however, there is no single Districts group with the charter to bring all of the necessary skills together for work that is to be performed. • The exact nature of the tasks to be performed and the required background, education, training, and the placement of this staff within the Districts' organization. • The necessary skill sets need to be integrated and unified. A fundamental component of system support success are the key capabilities that this group must possess. In summary, these key capabilities include the following: • Group Management, including interdeparmtent procedures, technical resource management, planning, and personnel administrative management • Operations Interface, including day-today support, training, and long- term system planning to meet operations needs • Engineering Capability, including design support, system planning, process control strategy development, control software development, and construction coordination • Maintenance Responsibility, including software maintenance, hardware maintenance, and documentation The actual group organizational structure, composition, and placement in the Districts' organization are issues that need to be addressed by the Districts. SC01MI3832 W5 6-1 Process Control Group This group has the responsibility and mission to provide support for the process control systems. This includes but is not limited to real-time systems. The type of services provided include real-time operations and maintenance support, business systems support, engineering, planning, construction coordination, and documentation. Philosophy and Mission The responsibility and support mission requires a blend of skills that in many cases cross existing organizational boundaries. It requires a group that contains the appropriate man- agement structure and technical makeup, and a service-oriented mission. This group requires technical skills from various backgrounds because of the wide-ranging responsi- bilities which crossover when meeting needs of other departments. Process control and monitoring systems have traditionally crossed organizational boundaries regardless of the industry or site-specific administrative organization. Following is a list of many of the functions required of a generic process control group not specific to the Districts. (Note: The following breakdown is by function under the domain of a process control group.) Management • Development of procedures with other administrative groups, such as operations, maintenance, and engineering • Standardization of hardware and software requirements • Establishment and maintenance of service-oriented philosophy • Management that is both technically and administratively skilled Operations • Day-to-day, real-time operations and maintenance support • Operations training of control system functions Engineering • System design support, including hardware and software • System planning, including hardware and software • Process control strategy development • Process control strategy implementation • Software development • Construction coordination SC01M15932.WP5 6-2 Maintenance • Software maintenance • Continuous hardware and software documentation • Hardware maintenance support Technological Skills It is important to have a group that is competent, capable, credible, and experienced in the following technical areas: • Hardware - Instrumentation - PLC (and peripheral devices) - VAX - Workstations • Software - PLC software - VAX SCADA system Communication protocols such as Ethernet or ModbusPlus • Operations and Maintenance - Process control theory - Operations theory - Wastewater treatment operations scotoousrzwes 6-3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY, CAOFORNIA 10844 ELUS AVENUE August 18, 1994 (Revised) A080.0127 August 12, 1994 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.C.AUFUANIA 92728.9127 7141962.2411 STAFF REPORT TRANSITION PLAN TO IMPLEMENT PLANT AUTOMATION GROUP BACKGROUND After considerable study, debate and discussion, and supported by a consulting engineering firm's (CH2M Hill) recommendations and an inter-departmental task force recommendation, executive management staff recommended to the Fiscal Policy Committee (FPC) that the Information Services Division should be expanded to assume responsibility for the plant automation, monitoring and computer control systems so that all computer activities are centralized in one Division. The skill sets needed for this growing function need to be integrated and unified for best results. This new group will need to be on-call 24 hours a day, have a close working relationship with Operations, Maintenance and Engineering, provide software development for process control, and manage or oversee the development and implementation of various outside service contracts. During their 1994-95 budget deliberations, the FPC approved this recorAmendation as part of the total personnel changes deleting 5 positions overall and reducing the payroll by $113,664. At the May 25, 1994 joint meeting of the Executive and Fiscal Policy Committees, the decision was made to hold all 1994-95 personnel recommendations in abeyance, rather than to include such changes in the budget process. Detailed recommendations for any future personnel changes deemed urgent enough to precede the management study being conducted by Ernst & Young would be considered on a case-by-case basis by the Executive Committee. The work awaiting this proposed Plant Automation Group is considered to be of sufficient urgency to warrant consideration, and this report will provide the details of how this group will be implemented. PROPOSED PERSONNEL AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES Attachment 1 summarizes the current organization chart for the Information Services Division. This chart illustrates functional groups and reporting relationships. Attachment 2 expands the organizational view to six pages to show the detailed proposed changes to the Division with the addition of the proposed Plant Automation Group. A detailed discussion of the proposed positions follows: 1 August 18, 1994 (Revised) August 12, 1994 PROPOSED POSITIONS One new Systems Engineer ($4,495 - 6,360) position is proposed as the first of three needed by 1995-96. This first Systems Engineer will supervise the following positions in addition to the normal duties to develop logic and flow diagrams, prepare scopes of work, evaluate and review specifications, and assist in the development of software and hardware training. This position will require certification as a Professional Engineer. This individual must maintain a close working relationship with Operations, Maintenance and Engineering. This position and budget will be transferred from an existing Engineer ($4,495 - 6,360) position in Planning and Design. The functions of one new Project Specialist ($4,080 - 5,775) position are proposed (as the first of three positions to be needed by 1995-96) to assist the Systems Engineer and to be responsible for the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) function, including network design and hardware and software selection. This position requires a Grade 5 Operators' Certification (Operations Supervisor) to insure the intimacy necessary with wastewater treatment. There will be no added cost for this position as it is already filled. This position will be filled by assignment of existing staff by the Director of Operations, at his pleasure. The budget and personnel will remair"in Operations and may continue to be classified as an Operations Supervisor. This position will function in a matrix arrangement between Plant Automation Group and Operations. This has worked successfully for the Compliance Division of Technical Services which has a resident Programmer/Analyst who receives day-to-day direction from the Compliance Manager but maintains a formal relationship within the Information Services Division — attending all staff meetings, receiving training opportunities and being part of the normal activities of fellow Programmer/Analysts on staff. The Project Specialist would, in turn, be expected to participate fully in all staff meetings of Operations while working within the Plant Automation Group. Filling the position by assignment will allow the Director of Operations the greatest flexibility in staffing this position to support Plant Automation while at the same time providing a unique opportunity to cross-train senior level Operations Supervisors in automation technology. Three additional Programmer/Analyst ($3,700 - 5,235) positions were proposed in the 1994-95 personnel recommendations to provide programming for various Information Services activities. The one position designated for Plant Automation will provide support for real-time applications, develop graphic screens, and configure software in support of plant automation. The other two positions are to support non-Plant Automation activities — the expanding Ethernet local area network data highway, the proposed financial information system and the rest of the Districts' informational 2 August 18, 1994 (Revised) August 12, 1994 problem solving needs. The Programmer/Analyst position for Plant Automation will require extensive experience in high level programming for real-time applications and especially for CRISP/32 software. Only one position is included in this proposal. One additional Programmer ($3,195 - 4,525) position is required, in addition to a currently vacant position, to provide the interface between this new system and many programmable logic controllers (PLC) in use throughout the two plants, to program the various man-machine interfaces and for other programming duties. One existing Information Services Technician III ($3,212 - 3,999) position will be filled to provide a Computer Aided Drafting (CAD) specialist who will be needed to help document the design efforts as well as assist in documenting as-built drawings of existing SCADA systems. Funding for all of these positions is already in the 1994-95 budget and the total personnel count will be maintained through vacant positions. The maximum costs for the proposal, assuming the positions were filled for the entire year at the top of the ranges, can be summarized as follows: Position Total Systems Engineer $ 76,320 Project Specialist (Operations Supervisor) 69,300 Programmer/Analyst 62,820 Programmer 54,300 Info Services Tech 111 47,988 TOTAL SALARIES 310 728 When originally considered by the FPC, the new positions and the transfers were offset by other changes or deletions resulting in an agency-wide decrease of 5 positions and a payroll reduction of $113,664. Only the reduction of $113,664 has been approved by the Joint Boards. No budget change is required for these additional positions. 3 August 18, 1994 (Revised) August 12, 1994 STAFFING PLAN Consultations have begun with the Personnel Office to formulate the detailed Classification Descriptions of the newly proposed positions and title changes, covering topics such as education and certification. Immediately upon joint Board's approval of the plan proposed in this report, Personnel Office will begin to recruit to fill the positions and/or transfer existing personnel now working in other Departments. Future staffing beyond 1994-95 will be defined by the progress of the Plant Automation efforts and as a direct result of needs identified within a forward-moving window of planning. Other changes that can be anticipated for the future at this time is the eventual addition of more System Engineers with more refined areas of expertise and more Programmer/Analysts and PLC Programmers. Exact areas of specialization will be best defined as time and experience proves the need. Any changes will be considered by the Directors during future budget processes. OFFICE SPACE A formal job plan has been submitted and drawings are being completed to provide appropriate working space within the Operations and Maintenance Building so that this group will be in close physical contact to their customer. Space is available on the west end of the second floor of that building which was left unfinished during construction for future use. The job plan provides for the finishing of walls, suspended ceiling, raised flooring, wiring for power, telephone and data and partitions for six offices. Additional space will be used as a test area for testing simulation configurations with a test PLC, computers and plant automation software. Staff's cost estimate to complete this remodeling and furnishing is $266,000 which is included in the approved 1994-95 CORF budget for miscellaneous small improvement projects. COMPUTER SYSTEMS The principal project which will be the immediate focus of the Plant Automation Group is the Expansion of Computer and Control Systems, Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31. Due to the nature of this project, it is recommended that the responsibility for this project shift and be formally reassigned to the Plant Automation Group of Information Services. A number of computer hardware and software resources have already been acquired by the Engineering Department in direct support of this project. Some computer hardware is included but of particular concern is the computer software. It 4 August 18, 1994 (Revised) August 12, 1994 is recommended that these resources be transferred to the Plant Automation Group of Information Services. Other required resources will be supplied as part of the contract for Job No. J-31-3 for the use of the additional staff planned for the Plant Automation Group. INITIAL TRAINING AND TRAVEL The Training and Travel needs for the Plant Automation Group are shown in Attachment 3 (gray), Summary of Training and Travel needs for 1994-95. These critical, initial costs should be considered as part of the CRISP/32 software implementation and capitalized. They can be funded from the CORF budget. The first four courses listed are the courses required by various staff members to be able to obtain their requisite levels of expertise in the CRISP software. This training must be obtained at the Square D CRISP training facilities in Dublin, Ohio because the training includes heavy "hands-on" involvement utilizing test facilities that enable the trainee to make software modifications and seethe results on real physical processes. This type of training is not possible here at the Districts at this time. In the future, the Plant Automation Gtoup plans to build an isolated training system to enable test scenarios to be used without any adverse effect upon real "live" processes. In a similar manner, the training listed for items 5 and 6 must also be received at the manufacturer's facilities. These courses are for the software maintenance for the computer systems used for the Central Generation control computers. Items 7 and 8 are training courses for the Modicon PLCs to enable the Plant Automation PLC Programmers to program these PLCs. The training courses are available in Northern California. The final three courses for 1994-95 are training courses for the DEC operating system used by the central computers used by Plant Automation, the DEC VAX 4700A. These courses will be available locally. The costs indicated for these last three courses are present costs. Some savings may be realized from obtaining the same training from other sources. The total amount required for 1994-95 training and travel for the Plant Automation Group is $90,842.00. The costs shown for 1994-95 reflect the high start-up costs associated with the beginning of a new functional group, new plant-automation software and the training which will be required initially. The training and travel costs are expected to decrease by half for 1995-96. For comparison purposes, the training and travel estimated for 1995-96, which is 5 August 18, 1994 (Revised) August 12, 1994 expected to be reduced to $44,900, is a continuation of the training for the DEC computer software and network management. Most of these courses are local and the number of staff members requiring this training will be fewer than in 1994-95. TRANSITION OF WORKLOAD FROM INSTRUMENTATION MAINTENANCE DIVISION The Instrumentation Maintenance Division has, in addition to maintaining the physical hardware of the Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), provided the programming of the software for these units and what amount of networking that was involved. This division will continue to maintain the physical hardware of the PLCs but the Plant Automation Group will assume the responsibility for the development of software, man-machine interface and documentation standards, as well as the development, maintenance and configuration management of all related software. This transition will occur over a period of time with a number of activities overlapping at times. This will require close coordination and communication between Instrumentation and the Plant Automation Group. This transition period is illustrated in Attachment 4, TRANSITION OF WORKLOAD FROM ENGINEERING PLANNING & DESIGN DIVISION The Planning & Design Division of the Engineering Department has the responsibility of planning and designing the physical facilities and processes at the Districts. The Plant Automation Group will establish and maintain standards in relation to the Districts' Plant Automation hardware, software and documentation. These standards, once established, will enable the Planning and Design Division to more effectively plan and design treatment processes and facilities. During the initial transition period, a high degree of cooperation and communication will be required to overcome the problems which have slowly been building over the years. These problems were experienced in the planning and design of systems and facilities which included high technology and resulted from computerization activities not having been previously centralized. While standards are being developed, Plant Automation staff will need to meet with Planning & Design staff constantly to eliminate duplication, discrepancy and other problems that may be discovered for projects which are already in the design process or are in the process of construction. It will necessitate some change orders on existing projects to insure that the resulting facility is in compliance with standards which will be still in development. Eventually, these types of change orders will taper off as new projects are begun with established standards in effect to guide the Planning and Design Division efforts. 6 August 18, 1994 (Revised) August 12, 1994 RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the approval of the Staffing Plan for the new Plant Automation Group for 1994-95. All of the costs have been included in previously approved 1994-95 Joint Works Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund budgets, and thus there are no budget impacts of their proposal. Total Staffing $310,728 Initial Software Training 90,842 Building Remodelling 266,000 Total $867.570 FI WPDOCSISNYDERIREPORTS IPA DDOC.SH 7 ATTACHMENT 1 INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION 2240 ORGANIZATION CHART as of July 19. 1994 (Does NOT reflect salary levels) INFORMATION SERVICESI GER I posNan SECRETARY 1 rcM INFORIAATION SOFTWARE INFORIAATON LGRAPHICS SEANCES SPECMLST SERNCES COORDINATOR SPECIAUST ANALYST 1 pOMCn 1 PPPNPn 1 pYbn 1 Wpm ] PROGRAMMER PRWRAMMER PRINCIPAL INFORMATION SENIOR GRAPHICS SERVICESTECHNICMN SM/oANA�YLsw L TECHNICIAN 1 WMm 2pP. 1Oq�RP tPupSn PROGRAMMER GRAPHICS INFTWMON TECHNICIAN SERVICESTECHNICIAN IAN�AYLIST III C:,P" I SUp I. J pprXmf IpmI1Mp auMa¢eal PROGRAMMER PROGRAMMER Gm Supp INFORMATION 2NyMnl Igfftgn SERVICESTECHNICMN _— 11 3 pPPpms INFORMATON SERVICES TECHNICIAN Imne AUIHp¢eE) Pa Ee 1 ATTACMENT 2 INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION 2240 ORGANIZATION CHART PROPOSED FOR 1994-95 (Does NOT reflect salary levels) INFORMATION SERVICES MANAGER 1 pa�uon SECRETARY W.d.R SYSIEN .R VICE ENGINEER INFORMATION ON P S EGaL ST INSERAVLIYST N L ORD'NATOR CIALIST PLANT HARDWARE SOFTWARE VAX GRAPHICS AUTOMATION /TELECOM SUPPORT SUPPORT SERVICES GROUP SUPPORT GROUP GROUP GROUP GROUP Page L ATTACILIENT 2 PLANT AUTOMATION GROUP SYSTEMS ENGINEER t nosnion In") PRCIIECT SPEO MIST t WmmnNn PflOGflAMMER /ANAIYGT CRISP epeuFat t Wµngn In ) PROGRAMMER PLC nwen I Wanms It new,t aainy) INFORMATION SERVIOES TECNNICMN III CAO sPewYsl t W.nIW IeauWl Page 2 ATTACILNENT 2 HARDWARE/TELECOM GROUP INFORMATION SERVICES SPECIALIST 1 po n PRINCIPAL INFORMATION SERVICES TECHNICIAN I poOAmn SENIORINFORMATION EERVICESTEOHNICIAN Inoue eMn..) INFORMATION SERVICES TECHNICIAN III 2 p00 0Ne INFORMATION SERVICESTECHNICIAN It 2 FPUP.. =EINCIAN) Page 7 ATTACHMENT 2 - SOFTWARE SUPPORT GROUP SOFTWARE EPEUALIST pOoro PROGRAMMER IM YST Saurw CVl Support 2 Pesnw s PROGRAMMER ,ANALYST Cwnqunm svpF 1 PPs�M PROGRMIMER ANALYST FIS SuPWR t pasn,cn PROGRA�MEft I Oa Page 4 ATTACHMENT $ VAX SUPPORT GROUP AT N SERMOSS LYST PROGRAMMER I YST YAx sww i pmeion PROGRAMMER A NLYST NeM'M Sppparl 1N. PROGRAMMER Gepeni supw I Wfe Page 5 ATTACHMENT $ ' GRAPHICS SERVICES GROUP GwHICS COORDINATOR 1 Now SENIOa GRPPHICa TECHNICIAN 1 PneX o GWKICS TECHNICM IneneeWvtaE) Page 6 JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES TRAVEL AND TRAINING. SUMMARY SHEET DEPARTMENT Finance FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 DIVISION Information Services NO. 2240 PAGE 1 OF 1 ITEM NO. OF NO. OF ESTIMATED UNIT COST EXTENDED JUSTIFICATION FOR NO TIMES STAFF DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY COST ACTIVITY •• OCCUR. TRAVEL PER DIEM LODGING FEES- TOTAL 1 1 5 Level t CRISP/32 Training 0450 $400 $1,200 $2,600 $4,650 $22,750 All PA Staff 2 1 2 Level 2 CRISP/32 Training $460 $200 $600 $1,500 $2,750 $5,500 CRISP Prog,Sys Engr 3 1 2 Level 3 CRISP/32 Training $450 $200 $600 $1.600 $2,750 $5,500 CRISP Prog,Sys Engr 4 1 3 CRISP MMI Training $450 $160 $480 $1,300 $2,390 $7,170 CRISP Prog,2 PLC Rog 5 1 3 FT100 C80S Training $375 $160 $4001 $1,200 $2,215 1 $6,645 2 PLC Nog. + TBD 6 1 3 FT210 C80S Training $375 $200 $600 $2.400 $3,575 $10,725 2 PLC Prog, + TB13 7 2 3 Modlcon ModBab Plus $178 $160 $480 $900 $1,718 $10,308 2 PLC Prog. + TBq 8 1 3 Modicon Ladder Logic Advanc $170 $too $450 $900 $1,718 $6,154 2 PLC Prog. + TBD 9 1 5 OpenVMS Level 1 $0 $10 $0 $1,800 $1,810 $9,050 All PA Staff except Aide 10 1 2 OpenVMS Level 2 $0 $10 $0 $2,OD0 $2.010 $4,020 CRISP Prog, 1 PLC Plug 11 1 2 OpenVMS Laver 3 $0 $10 $0 $2,000 $2,010 $4,020 CRISP Prog, 1 PLC Prog TOTAL EXTENDED COST $90,842.00 REQUESTED BY: DATE: APPROVED BY: DATE: DEPARTMENT HEAD APPROVED BY: DATE: GENERAL MANAGER w Including registration, tuition, meeting room fees, consultant costs, and other support costs. 00 e •• Add attachment for activities totalling more then $ CSDOC PLANT AUTOMATION PLAN 1994-96 1994 1995 AUG I SEPTI OCT I NOV I DEC I JAN I FEB I MAR I APR I MAY I JUN I JUL I AUG I SEPT I I E HIRING , REVISION OF MASTER PLAN CRISP LEVEL 1 TRAINING , CRISP LEVEL 2&3 TRAINING, ADVANCED TRAINING oADDM 3 STANDARDS oTAKE OVER J28 SUPPORT , P&S' , BID , NTP' , J31-1 FIBER OPTIC BACKBONE VAX CONFIG PLANT 1 , CONFIG A-e ON CRISP � PLANT CONFIG MODICONS PLANT 1 TAKE OVER 3 c SOFTWARE m CBOS TRAINING , SUPPORT INTERGRATE TAKE OVER BOTH CO-GENS o CBOS SUPPORT P&S' , BID , NTP' , IMFS'1 &2 COBS CITY& PLANT WATER o TAKE OVER PROCURE, VAX CONFIG PLANT 2 COB SUPPORT CONFIG A-B ON CRISP PLANT 2 i P &S' =Plans and Specs , CONFIG MIDICONS PLANT 2 , NTP' = Notice to Proceed , P &S' BID NTP' , SECONDARY TREATMENT , IMFS' = Influent Metedng Flow System , P&S , BID , NTP , HEADWORKS fd0.ti)M . Y August 12, 1994 STAFF REPORT PLANT AUTOMATION STATUS REPORT SUMMARY The purpose of this document is to present to the Board of Directors the present status of the Plant Automation computer systems approved to date, and the factors which are leading toward a desired change in direction of the original CH2M Hill contract entitled "Expansion of Computer and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2", J- 31 . This modification will save the Districts considerable time, money and effort. The following three topics are covered in this report: Job No. J-31 Addendum 3, Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) standardization, and factory configuration of the VAX4000 Model 700A computer system. BACKGROUND The HSQ system was designed to only monitor plant processes - not to provide control. However, in the years which have passed since the specifications were written, the Districts' needs and facilities have expanded, resulting in an ever-widening gap between what was originally specified and what is now required. Distributed control (versus monitoring only) is now agreed to be a need. In January 1993, CH2M Hill was awarded a Professional Services Agreement for Job No. J-31 . This agreement was to provide engineering services for the preparation of construction documents and supporting documents, and to update the current operations and maintenance manuals. The agreement is to also provide construction support and training for the project described including connection of missing PLCs for the SCADA system, a new PLC-based Ocean Outfall Booster Station (OOBS) control system and develop graphic displays, PLC programming guidelines, modify existing and prepare new plans and specifications for the integration of remaining facilities into the plant computer monitoring system installed by HSQ under contract titles "Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation", J-23-2 and "Replacement of Computerized Monitoring Systems at Plant 2", P2-44, respectively. Job No. J-31 was originally intended to finish what the HSQ system started. Subsequent to award of the job, it appeared that control functions were needed and the project began to investigate making those changes as well. Serious questions arose as to the working of the HSQ system, even within the limited scope it was designed for. In December 1993, the Engineering Department contracted with CH2M Hill to conduct a needs analysis based on current requirements to determine what would be required to expand the system capability from a monitoring only system to a monitoring and August 12, 1994 control system, as well as an evaluation of the HSQ/Miser system's compliance with specifications. The results of this study are found in a technical memorandum from CH2M Hill, dated February 11 , 1994, and "Job J-31 Addendum 1; Study Results and Recommendations"(Study Results), dated April 1994, copies of which have been previously provided to Directors. CH2M Hill's technical memorandum mainly identifies the problems found in the original specifications. The Study Results give a broader view of the issues and give specific recommendations of how the Districts can proceed. In brief, CH2M Hill's Study Results showed that the HSQ system was unnecessarily complex, too slow and too inflexible to meet the needs of the Districts. With the hardware configuration that was delivered and installed, the HSQ system would not meet the performance specifications for monitoring even for the limited number of PLCs originally specified. The addition of more PLCs and/or the addition of control functions would degrade the system's performance further. The most critical issue is the slow processing time. This is a result of the complexity of the hardware configuration, as well as the model of VAX computer which was supplied by HSQ. CH2M Hill's Study Results stated that the HSQ system will meet neither our short and long-term monitoring, nor our long-term plant automation needs and recommended a number of corrective options. In July 1994, the Districts adopted the following corrective option based upon a Special Selection Committee re: Computers Recommendation: 1. This option provides the integration of the Level 5 local Modicon PLCs into a CRISP system. A CRISP site license will be procured, a DEC VAX supervisory computer allocated and installed for loading the CRISP software, and DEC workstations allocated and installed for operator workstations. The PLCs will be interconnected via a ModbusPlus network with direct connection into the VAX. The activities associated with the implementation of a CRISP system include the following: a. Design, procure, and install the system b. Train support and operations staff C. Configure system (including but not limited to operations interface, communications, and system setup) d. Interconnect the Level 5 local Modicon PLCs using the ModbusPlus communications protocol e. Connect the Level 5 local Modicon PLCs directly to the VAX. This will require 2 August 12, 1994 the purchase, installation, and configuration of a ModbusPlus software driver from CRISP. f. Leave the existing Level 2 A-B PI data concentrators and Level 3 A-B PLCs as is, with no additional local PLCs connected to this system. All new and existing Level 5 Local Modicon PLCs should connect directly to the VAX. Make provisions, including hardware and software, to incorporate the existing A-B PLCs into the VAX. On July 13, 1994, following a Committee recommendation the Joint Board of Directors authorized the purchase of two Digital Equipment Corporation VAX 4000, Model 700A computer systems for Plant 1 in addition to the software site license for Plant 1 and Plant 2 utilizing a Square D CRISP 32 Process Control Application Package. FACTORY CONFIGURATION OF CRISP SOFTWARE & DEC HARDWARE (Factory Test) The new computer systems will require both hardware and software integration prior to final installation at Plant 1 and Plant 2 in the future. Due to the complex nature of this system, the configuration should be carried out at the Square D, Automation Software Group, facility in Dublin, OH. A final factory acceptance test is proposed to verify that all the functional and performance requirements of the control systems are met before the on-site installation. The following tasks are proposed to be completed by Square D to meet our requirements: 1. Configure DEC Hardware and CRISP 32 Application Software 2. Install CRISP Inter-Computer Communications Hardware 3. Install Modicon ModbusPlus Interface Hardware 4. Load device drivers, Modicon RTU, ModbusPlus, Allen-Bradley and PMI 5. Integrated System Test 6. Witness Factory Acceptance Test, 5 days duration All of the above is proposed to be provided for an amount not to exceed $42,412 per plant (Attachment B). These factory test and configuration costs were itemized in the 1994-95 budget and in the June Committee report to the Joint Boards summarized as Attachment A. 3 August 12, 1994 PROPOSED ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO CH2M HILL JOB NO. J-31 The CH2M Hill Study Results highlighted a number of key problems including the lack of standards in both Operator Interfaces, PLC hardware/software and documentation. Proposed Addendum 3 to the J-31 contract with CH2M Hill addresses these problems. It will provide the Districts with a set of working field-proven standards covering the following: 1. Operator Graphics Standards 2. PLC Template Standards 3. Documentation Standards The standards will provide the Districts with long-term benefits of a uniform system for both plants that can easily be understood by operations or modified and documented by maintenance for any future modifications. The graphical interface, display functions, and system standardization approach will result in a uniform product for plant operations and maintenance personnel. This offers a long-tens benefit to the plant operations for system hardware and software maintenance, operations training, and operator interface. Operators will know how each control function and graphical display should look and operate before delivery of the final system. The standards development process has also facilitated the creation of standard libraries and reusable codes so that future expansions or modifications are simple. Every project manager strives for success while addressing the challenges of schedule, accuracy, documentation, and user acceptance. The development of software standards involving the end user, prior to the software production phase, is a critical vehicle for successful project delivery. These standards will be supplied to all project design staff, contractors and consultants for incorporation into future jobs, thus ensuring Districts-wide system integration, communications and a standard man-machine interface. The following three projects are examples of the standards to be developed and are ultimately to be refined over a number of future projects: 1. Plant No.1: Headworks, Panel Replacement and Control System Upgrade This project will replace the existing control panel at Power Building 3A and upgrade the existing monitoring system to full control, providing for remote automatic control of the diversion gates at the influent and the conversion of the grit chamber 4 August 12, 1994 discharge gates from manual control to automatic remote control. This project will greatly reduce the time required by Operations to adjust flows, resulting in considerable cost savings. 2. Plant No. 2: Oxygen Facility, Panel and Control System Upgrade East and West RAS/WAS Facility, Panel Replacement and Control System Upgrade. The current Fisher and Porter Control System was installed in 1978. The existing instrument controllers are no longer manufactured or repaired by the vendor. The process controlled by these systems is critical to the operation of the secondary treatment plant and the delay of a replacement control system could have devastating results if a breakdown occurs in the future. The new control systems should be fully automated with remote control capability. 3. Plant No. 1: City Water Pump Station Panel Replacement and Control System Upgrade Plant Water Pump Station Panel Replacement and Control System Upgrade This project will replace the existing control panels and upgrade the existing monitoring system to full control, providing for remote automatic control of the pump stations. This project will greatly reduce the time required by Operations to adjust flows and pressures. The CH2M Hill proposal for Addendum No. 3 to Job No. J-31 is attached (Attachment C) and includes an accurate listing of the standards to be developed and their benefits. The full cost of this work is estimated not to exceed $532,300 for traditional engineering services and $785,900 for system integration for a total not exceed $1,318,200, and was included in the 1994-95 budget and the July report (Attachment A). MODICON PLC STANDARDIZATION The Districts currently maintain approximately thirty model 984 Series Modicon PI-Cs installed at Plants 1 and 2 and nineteen Modicon PI-Cs installed in the Districts' remote pump stations. These Modicon PI-Cs contain approximately 600 modules and processors 5 August 12, 1994 of various types. The total installed cost for modules and related hardware for support of the Modicon PLCs is approximately $2,500,000. The Maintenance Division also has a stock of eighty modules to maintain the Modicon PLCs. These modules range in cost from $3,000 for processors to $300 for basic input/output cards. Modicon PLCs are currently installed on several major projects as indicated in the following table: PLANT 1 PLANT 2 Prima -Scrubbers North Scrubber Dewatering South Scrubber Valve Sequencing Dewatering (Hot Standby) Phys Chem Valve Sequencing City Water Ph s Chem DAFT PEPS (Hot Standby) Gas-Compressor (Hot Power Building A Standby) Cake Transfer System Gas-Compressor (Hot Standby) (Hot Standby) Plant Water Truck Loading Digester Gas Flares Digester Gas Flares Basins 1, 2&5 Headworks(Hot Standby) Headwork Scrubbers Headwork MSP's (Hot Standby) Ph s Chem Blower Building Digester 7-10 Waste Side Stream Basins 6-15 When a single programmable logic controller from any other manufacturer is introduced into the plant control systems, a basic load list of spare parts must be maintained. For the 6 August 12, 1994 first PLC installed by a new manufacturer, it costs the Maintenance Division 50% of the original hardware cost of that PLC to purchase adequate spare parts to support the unit. The Districts currently use Taylor Industrial Software as the standard software application for interfacing with and programming the Modicon programmable logic controllers. This software can be used universally for all of the Modicon PLCs. The Maintenance Division currently has seven sets of the Taylor Industrial Software, The Taylor Industrial Software is under a site license agreement for new purchases. The cost of the software currently owned by the Districts is approximately $34,000. This investment enables Districts' personnel to develop PLC programs and interface with existing Modicon PLCs for troubleshooting purposes. An annual software maintenance agreement, costing $3,800, provides for software upgrades to the existing software packages and continuous technical support. If different programmable logic controllers (other than Modicon) are purchased for installation on new contracts, associated applications software (along with software maintenance agreements) must be obtained to support the hardware purchased. The cost of these software packages and the additional computer hardware required is cost prohibitive from a maintenance and software development point of view. The final concern is the training requirements for Engineering and Maintenance staff. Current training for the PLC control systems comes from two sources. Programmable logic controller training is included in some of the Engineering projects and through funds budgeted for training by the Instrumentation Division. The training received through Engineering projects is provided by the contractor or, in some cases, by the training representative of the equipment manufacturer. The training costs for the Instrumentation Division have been approximately$25,000 over the past four years. The training is critical and must be repeated at periodic intervals to ensure that staff is able to meet the challenges of the latest technology. When new technology is introduced through different manufacturers, the existing staff has to overcome the learning curve required to master the maintenance and software requirements of the new hardware. From the fiscal budget standpoint, the funds for this training are, very often, not available. CH21M Hill, the Districts' consulting engineers on Job No. J-31, has recommended that we standardize on Modicon PLCs as the preferred communication protocol. Modicon PLC standardization will allow the Districts to fully utilize the spare parts inventory, which is in excess of$95,000, with minimal additions of spare parts in the future, and to minimize the requirements for training and software support in maintaining a single PLC type, thus enabling a reduced maintenance cost on all future projects. 7 August 12, 1994 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are presented to the Directors for their approval: 1. Staff recommends approval of the system integration services for Plant 1 and Plant 2, VAX equipment and software from Square D Company per their Proposal No. C4-0022 dated May 10, 1994 (Attachment B). This will result in the process control computer system performance requirements being fully proven before shipping and installation at the Districts. Each factory test will cost$42,412 and the total price is $84,824 plus tax. These costs are identified as lines 9 and 12 in the "Computerization of Plant Monitoring & Automation Improvements Budgets Summary" submitted June 8, 1994 (Attachment A). 2. Staff recommends approval of the J-31 Addendum 3 for CH2M Hill to provide professional services outlined in the Scope of Work (Attachment D). Costs are not to exceed $532,300 for traditional engineering services, which was below the budget estimate of$800,000 (Attachment C) and $785,900 for software integration services per CH2M Hill Proposal SCW404.A3 (Attachment C) dated June 22,1994. The software integration services are part of the total construction costs. The total price is $1,318,200 and is identified as line 7 for traditional engineering services, and lines 14 and 16 in the "Computerization of Plant Monitoring & Automation Improvements Budgets Summary" submitted June 8, 1994 (Attachment A). 3. Staff recommends approval to standardize on Modicon PI-Cs and to specify them on all new construction projects requiring PI-Cs. F.1 WPDOCSISNYDERIREPORTSISTA TUS.SS 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRI ATTACHMENT A el ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNU +oeaA sus AV E vn 00.8127 MJMAiN VALLEY RlpN 9a 84 prA19b23At1 June 2,1994 COMPUTERIZATION OF PLANT MONITORING S AUTOMATON IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET SUMMARY PERIOD DESCRIPTION PLANT 1 PLANT 2 TOTAL COMPLETED WORK 1990 1. Install HSO Computer Monitoring Systems and fiber optic network. $2.10 M 52.00 M $4.10 M 1994 Presently manners 15%Plant 1 and 30%Plant 1993 2. Job J31 awarded to CH2MHill.Expansion of Existing Computer $0.19 M $0.01 M $020 M Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2. 1994 3. J31 Addendum No.1,HSO and Control System,Review and $0.03 M $0.02 M $0.05 M Evaluation a. t ,I,• TOTAL COST OF COMPLETED WORK S2.32M $203M- 34.35M FUTURE AUTHOR17ED WORK 1994-6 14. Completion of remaining J31 System Design and Ira lementrion $0.20 M SO23 M SO.43 M FUTURE PROPOSED WORK(Preliminary Estimated Costs for Butl ethi Puma es July 5. Purchase CRISP Software Site License,both Plants(Per 0 3) $022 M S022 M SCA4 M 1994 6. Purchase Digital Equipment VAX Computer Equip.(Per#3) $0A0 M - SOAO M August 7. J31 Addendum No.3(Currently under evaluation by Staff and not $0.40 M $0.40 M $0.80 M 1994 yet proposed to Boards): a. Develop integration standards b. Design plan to modernize and renovate existing obsolete and high maintenance instrumentation c. Automate report generation of Daily,Weekly,Monthly 5 Yeady Reports d. Miscellaneous Plant automation projects including life cycle cost analysts(See#10-16) 8. Install Additional Fiber Optic Network and Communications Equip $0.70 M SO.70 M $1.40 M Sept. 9. Computer System Setup and Factory Teat(Re#5 4 6) $0.05 M - $0.05 M 1994 Ongoing 10. Upgrade and consolidate existing PLC's(Per#7) $1.00 M SO.90 M $1.90 M Work Olru 11. Purchase Digital Equipment VAX Computer Equip.(Per#2) - $0.30M $0.30M 1998 12 Computer System Setup and Factory Test(Re#71) - $0.06 M $0.06 M 13. Replace Ocean Ouffall Booster Station DCS(Per 0287) - SO.60M $0.60M 14. Automate Plant 1 Headworks(Per#7) $0.65 M - $0.65 M 1S. Integrate digester#5-010 controls into existing PLC(Per 97) SO.39M - $0.39M 18. Replace and modify secondary treatment process existing $020 M ZOO $1.20 M Instrumentation and control systems(Per#7) 17.15%Contingency Fund - $1.29M P,,,! TOTALCOSTFOR PROPOSED FUTUREWORK' S421 Mn!t`'o+S9:62'M.. GRAND TOTAL COMPLETED'AND:PROPOSED-WORWATBOTH PLANTS:n$S16i=Ml ATTACHMENT B Proposal No. C4-022 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Mav 10, 1994 1 . 0 SQUARE D COMPANY INTEGRATION SERVICES FOR PLANT 1 1.1 SQUARE D COMPANY INTEGRATION SERVICES One (1) Redundant Pairs of Rack-mountable VAX 4700 CPUs for Operations Control Center for Plant 1 with disk, tape drives and cabinet to be provided by CSDOC and drop shipped to Square D Company, Dublin, OH facility for integration with ICC hardware. Also, One (1) Redundant Pair of VAXstauon 4000/90 CPUs for Co-Generation equipment for Plant 1 and Two (2) VAXstation 4000/90 workstations will be drop shipped to Dublin, OH facility for CRISP® standard software installation. Integration services include the following: Rmduction (Systern Technicians) The system technicians'services included in this proposal as are follows: • verification of equipment against bill of material • run self diagnostics on individual equipment • label cables and posts as required • interconnect equipment per system thawing • test basic functionality prior to releasing to system engineering • assist in total system testing and customer factory demonstration • disassemble system and prepare for packing and shipping Additional services include attendance at project status meetings to assure proper conformance to the customer's requirements. System Engin eri Services The system engineering services included in this proposal are as follows: • generation of first&-ift system configuration drawings used by the production technicians in the hardware integration • loading of the CRISP® standard software and other layered products such as IDI for MODBUS +and Power Measurement • setting up VMS parameters based on process loading • configuring the CRISP software consistent with the system hardware configuration • hardware and standard software testing • total system testing in order to verify operation prior to customer demonstration • five (5)day customer factory demonstration testing for Plant 1 • generation of as-built drawings • performing system back ups prior to shipment Additional services include attendance at project kickoff and project status meetings to insure proper conformance to the customer's requirements. Page 1 ATTACHMENTS Proposal No. C4-022 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Mav 10. 1994 Proiect Management The project management services included in this proposal are as follows: • providing the planning,direction, implementation and control to achieve project goals • directing company inquiries concerning schedule, technical, and financial consideration • generating, reviewing, updating and submitting system implementation schedule • assignment and coordination of a project team • providing effective schedule control to ensure the project is completed on, or before, scheduled completion data • initiating change orders • system integration and system tests • working with the Owner to assure the system has arrived at the site, been correctly installed, and has been successfully accepted by the Owner TOTAL INVESTMENT FOR SECTION 1.0 SQUARE D COMPANY INTEGRATION SERVICES........................$42,412• *NOTES: 1) Communication protocol information and Modicon programmable controller hardware and MODBUS Q-Bus card is required for the testing of the IDI device driver for Synchronous MODBUS +. 2) Factory Demonstration Testing includes testing of CRISP standard software products and ICC hardware communication. Actual testing of application software will be performed at a later date by others. 2 . 0 SQUARE D COMPANY SUPPORT SERVICES TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Field Engineering Services: $120 per hour, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, 8 hours inclusive with overtime (Saturday and over 8 hours weekdays) billed at 1.5 times the standard rate. Sunday and holidays will be billed at 2.0 times the standard rate. Travel and living will be billed as incurred. Field Product Engineering Services: $140 per hour, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, 8 hours inclusive with overtime (Saturday and over 8 hours weekdays) billed at 1.5 times the standard rate. Sunday and holidays will be billed at 2.0 times the standard rate. Travel and living will be billed as incurred. Telephone/Modem Application Support Services: 8 a.m. - 5 p.m. billed at $80 per hour. CRISP® Product Implementation Training is available at $2,650 per person for a two week course in Dublin, Ohio. Page 2 ATTACHMENT B Proposal No. C4-022 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Mav 10, 1994 3. 0 SQUARE D COMPANY DELIVERY AND TERMS* Anticipated delivery will be six (6) to eight (8) weeks after receipt of Digital Equipment hardware and Modicon programmable controller,MODBUS Q-Bus card and protocol and Power Measurement Model 3710 RTU hardware and protocol. Terms will be F.O.B. Dublin, Ohio. Freight charges will be prepaid and added. This offer shall remain valid through the regularly scheduled close of business on June 30, 1994. The acceptance of this offer shall not become effective until it is actually received by Square D Company on or before the date specified herein, notwithstanding the channel of communication utilized by the offeree. This offer is expressly conditioned on the offeree's acceptance of the terms and conditions specified by Form DC-049-1, attached, except for Paragraph 5 Payment. Services will be invoiced upon occurrence. Payment due net thirty (30) days from invoice date. In the event that a purchase results from this proposal, Square D Company requests the order be sent to: Square D Company 5160 Blazer Memarial Parkway Dublin, Ohio 43017 (614) 764-4200 (614)764-4279 (FAX) Atm: Ms. Ellie Boylan Also, to insure prompt processing of your order, please cite the Square D Company Proposal Number on the face of your order. Page 3 ATTACHMENT C Engineens Pionrws Economists Scientist June 22, 1993 SCW404.A3 Mr. Blake Anderson Director of Engineering County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Blake, Subject: Proposal for additional services for Job J-31, Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2. We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal for additional services. We have divided the fee proposal into two parts. The first part covers traditional consulting services for design, preparation of bid documents and services during construction. The second part covers software integration services. The latter includes development of software standards and software configuration of the programmable logic controllers (PLCs) and operator workstations. FEE PROPOSAL Part 1, Traditional Engineering Services Engineering/Consulting Services( direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 173%), not to exceed. $ 436,280 Direct expenses at cost, not to exceed. $ 49,900 Fixed Profit $ 46,120 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $ 532,300 MotgR,&5 o1—office 2510RedHaa� 7142501900 P.O.Box 15W.SontGAW,CA 92705-0960 Fox No. 714250.5609 ATTACHMENT C Part 2, Software Integration Services. Engineering/Consulting Services (direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 173%), not to exceed. $ 646,300 Direct expenses at cost, not to exceed. $ 71,400 Fixed Profit $ 68,200 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $785,900 Sincerely, CH2M HILL $t-- Jerry Boyle Regional Manager cc: S. Severn/ CSDOC J. Bloomquist/ CH2M HH J R. Denton/ CH2M HILL A. Came/ CR2M HII I AD3 IE'f1.WC ATTACHMENT C ORANGE COUNTY- COMPUTER SYSTEM EXPANSION,PLANTS 1 AND 2 2zaanaa ADDENDUM No3 , LABOR & COSTS D.1E0x=&TAPE DAY57 I QC out IaEor TASK fir 0 Ed Et E2 T4 OS Drys Con N MMI Standards Sapp.: Dewlap MMI standards for the Sauna-D CRISP and Square-D'Stroamline'packages based on the needs of District Operations and existing operator screens. o System capabilithe analysis o Requirements workshops o Reld audit o Pre ernme screen layouts&Symbology o Sample symbols for review/comment o Sample screens for reviewlcomment a MMI Standards manual lMper&disc) Assumptions: o Operations staff input available o Workshops armed to ten I101 maximum o CRISP training Part of package analysis o District's development system available (CRISP workstation.PLC,dml SWI Tasks: o C.MinmNpdate task scope&schedule 1 1 0 2 $2.131 o Rep,review,conform,issue Task Tech Memo 1.5 1.5 $1.480 a Setup&venly development systems 8 11 / 10 30 $24.013 o Dewlap ex.....a.menu system,A/M stations 8 18 0 20 48 $35.690 o Conduct&document workshops 12 12 5 29 $24.545 o Prep draft MMI standards document 2 16 10 3 30 $25.917 o Review meeting with District on MMI draft standard 1.25 1.5 2.75 $2.384 o Conform comments,issue final MMI standard. 3 5 3 11 $7,950 o Task coordination&administration 10 10 $9,870 3 59.75 57.5 1 1 35 3 162.25 a133,980 Sub otal with expecues = $147,378 P PLC Template Standards Scapa: Dayelop PLC programming standards for the Modicon 984 and Allen-Smo lay PLCS based on loathing operational use, interface to MMI,Task Ct,backup MMI,&facture modes. a Requirements workshops o Fmk)audit o Prototype tonal diagrams o PLC templates p PLC Standards manual(Pope,It duo Assumptions: a Developed after mom of MMI standards in piece o Operations&Maintenance stall input available 1. support for existing control algorithms o Workshops limited to ten(10)maximum o training on CRISP system is done during analysis o Dlatnct's development system available (CRISP workstation,PLC,davl SW) o Standardization of ten(10)process control loops 1. Comrol of a variable speed pump 2. Control of a fixed speed pump 3. Control of a mo0ulating valve 4. Control of an electric open/clpso valve S. Control of a pneumatic on/off valve S. Control for flow Pricing chemical addition 7. Closed loop flow(pressure.level)control Sierra 1 N%W0RKUmC5D0M0C vHRSS.xIS ATTACHMENT C ORANGE COUNTY - COMPUTER SYSTEM EXPANSION, PI= I AND 2 uaDea4 ADDENDUM No.3 , LABOR &COSTS (1A90R a STAFF DAYS) QC oW abor TASK E6 FS PA © M T4 Ofi Day, Cen 8. LDad/Ia9l Ab, /atendby lixed s0eetl pump control 9. LeadnaglAsg2mrandby variable speed pumps 10. To be spedhad Teske: o Confirm/Update task scope&schedule 1 1 2 4 $3.665 o Rap,mvlew, conform,issue Task Tech Memo 0.5 1 1.6 i1.260 o Verify District's development system 0.6 2 2.6 t2.027 o Prap for workshops 6 16 20 18.440 o Conduct&document workshops 8 3 11 :10.19] o Prep,review,conform comm®ister areas 6 6 14 012.498 o Prep.review,conform control diagrams 2.5 a 10.5 18.603 o SUM,test.archive templates for each bop type 2 2.5 20 5 29.5 t23,592 e Issue final PLC standards 4 4 6 2 16 $11.202 o Task coordination&administration 4 4 8 $7.016 Task subtotal: 3 36 0 65 01 101 21 116 606,551 Subtotal with expenses = $106,239 O Documentation Standards Scope: Develop 1&C documnetation standards vmh Cancer o KIDS o Loop diagrams o Eauipmment tagging o Instrument tagging o Was&cable numbering systems o Requirements workshops Assumptions: o Developed after MMI&PLC standards o Operations&Maintenance staff Input available o Workshops limited to(No(61 maximum o Automated(CAE)tool to be used Tasks: 0 $0 o Confirm Update task scope&schedule 2.5 1.5 4 03.618 pr ep.ep.review,conform,issue Task Tech Memo 0.: 1 1.5 $1,260 o Verify capabilities of CAE systems 2 6 7 06,809 o Rep for workshops 4 5 9 $7,783 o Conduct&document workshops 2.5 5 5 12.5 $9,799 o Rep,review,content draft standards quids 1 2 5 5 2 15 $11.220 o Issue final documentation standards gu de 5 5 $3,835 o Task coordination&administration 1 2.5 5 1 7.5 $6.302 Task subtotal: 1 16 0 32.5 0 10 2 e1.6 .628 Subtotal whip expenses = $$41,5119 K2 Headworks MSPs/pl-replace exist. ponel.add flow /diverersion gate monitoring.elinninote data cone.,include UPS &FO converter 2 2 02,298 o fidd-0ala gather/review exist amrnu dodon 3 3 6 043 7 o prepare draft P&EDs(9 max) 9 18 27 021,472 o finalse P&ID,alter Disuin micro 1 1.5 2.5 $2.036 a.m. 2 H.lweaxl4e\CSDDC=MMP55.%l5 ATTACHMENT C ORANGE COUNTY - COMPUTER SYSTEM EXPANSION,PLANTS 1 AND 2 uana4a ADDENDUM NO3 , L 11 ABOR &COSTS (LABOR=STAFF DAYS) 11 QC tool I46W TASK a 0 FA Q Q T4 OS Date Cuss 0 auend otu op w/Diana to conform tath 0.5 0.5 1 88 sop .stltM.&.seq. 00 0 prepa,e tab memo and Ism.w/Dimia anaureae 1 1 0816 o Temporary panel a 00 - predwign 0 00 mace w/Q tuff to discuss requiremenu 0.5 0.5 1 $768 - d Oa gather 0.5 0.5 $350 pnflunsauena 1 1 $876 prclimdr wings 0 00 phi drawing 1 2 3 $2,275 pastel elev&layout drawings(3 max) 0.5 2 4 6.5 $5.043 wiring diagr4m/Scbemadc drmvings(2 trox) 0.5 2 4 6.5 05.043 atmecdon dugmm drnvings(p0)-(3 max) 2 4 6 $4,550 epeeifindow 1 4 1 6 $4,877 mat w/0611 su8m review 0.5 03 1 $788 foul dmign/fuup 0 00 plan 0.1 013 035 $262 panel elev&layout 0.1 035 035 $262 traetmde 0.1 om 035 $262 con ti0n ding.(VO) 0.1 033 035 $262 Wee oc:uicns 0.5 03 0438 o Pemusant pawl 0 00 predesign 0 00 mat w/t3&g1 ttaR m ditaua m4Nremenu 0.5 0.5 1 $788 - datag=. 1 3 4 $2.974 dewlap conwl strategic✓review 6 6 $5.922 tWt merno for con"I vn&niw 1 1 1 3 $2,248 pnRm drawings 0 00 plat drawingt(4 max) 4 g 12 09.100 ,I.fioNpanel layout drawing 1 2 3 42.275 wiring dugnMSNcmodc dmwings(2 max) 2 4 6 $4.550 annecaon diagram drawings(1/0),7 maxi 2 4 6 $4,660 spaifcaaors I 8 1 10 $8,381 mares/Ogd.Ssm8mmica 0.5 0.5 1 $788 - fitW daigNfixup 0 00 plan 0 00 pvrcl elev&layout 0.15 033 0.5 0394 Schematic 0.15 om 0.5 $394 .cOu.o d4.(1/0) 035 023 0.5 $394 speufiadom 035 om $219 o Ptryare amuuwart can voi w etlulc 1.5 0.25 1.75 $1.699 o Mcaine w/O&M euRm ann.plan artl abelule 0.5 0.5 1 $932 0 PM=toorn0 daailiug plan and srbesule/ a om 1 1.25 $1.123 a SDC services 1 5 6 $5.368 0 Prepares manuals update 2 2 1 5 $4.647 0 P VweOpeamrsruning 2 2 $1.974 0 "tOenuinwroncedocvmevuaan 2 1 3 $2,359 o SORware preparaaoNiwalladoNtaustg 0 00 - saftwaa configuna4n is 159 176 $128.270 - softtvue loading/ORT twang 4 4 $2.798 - softwaa FAT ard.,,on 2 4 6 04.772 Task sub w 4 49.25 0.15 23g21 5 332.65 5235.1U Subtotal with expartges = $280,701 KS Oases Control Pauel(Oxygeu Plant)/plant 2-Replace panel&add UPS 2 2 $2,288 o kbd4 gather/aview W.dO normoa0n 3 3 6 $4,727 o praaa daft P&211t(a maal B 16 Ice $19,086 o Omura P&IDs a Orr Dhula mica 1 I 2.5 $2.036 o attend wo,wxp Wmisuia m..R.ust 0.5 03 1 $788 scupe,srlwd.&sa. o paParttawmemo aM inane w/Dietritt aowrana I 1 68 76 o semparuy panel 0 $0 SO - Prededgn 0 00 mat w/t]&0l sulyto diuvu requirancnu 0.3 0.5 1 8788 ar4a4 3 NAwoexM%CSD0C10c sesns6xts ATTACHMENT C ORANGE COUNTY- COMPUTER SYSTEM EXPANSION,PLANTS 1 AND 2 22-IunA ADDENDUM NO3 , LABOR &COSTS (LABOR STAPF DAYS) Qc o ar TASK E6 PS Be Ed 0 T4 05 Days can gable, 0.5S 350 polunaeauaa 1 1 $876 prelim dnwi� 0 00 plandramng 1 2 3 $2.275 pautJ dw&Ia7ou,dnwinp(2mul 03 2 4 6.5 $5.043 wiring dia,n Sa=oc dnw6ngN2 naa) OS 2 4 6.5 $6,043 co i OA diagram drawings(1/O)-(2 max) 2 4 6 $4.550 speufindcm 1 2 1 4 $3.124 mmw/O&M sort to mica OS 03 1 0788 A desigNOsup 0 00 plan 0.1 am 035 $262 Pa de &layau, 0.1 am 0.35 $262 rrbmauc 0.1 ox 0.35 $262 alug .drag.(VO) 0.1 om 0.35 $262 ePaifiauou 0S 0.5 $438 o Pmmanem Pual 0 00 Pr csign 0 40 races w/O&M so0m disase nquiremew 0.5 0.5 1 $788 deu guber 1 3 4 $2,974 podn se,u. 0.5 1 13 $1.370 pmllmdsa l gs 0 00 Plan&eo iogs(2 maa) 2 4 6 $4,650 dwa0on/Imel h"u,dnwing 1 2 3 $2,275 wiring dugg Sd m atic dnnNM(2 mu) 2 4 6 64.550 connoWon dbgnm drawings(1/0){Z mu) 2 4 6 04.550 g ifiwiom 3 5 1 9 $7,727 mar w/O&M son to nsiew OS 0.5 1 $788 fiml doigNflup 0 00 Ploy 0 00 Purl cl v&In., 025 am 03 $394 nbematic am am 03 $394 aoaa P pn ding.(I/O) am am 03 $394 epaalfsouom OS 0-5 1 $631 o pnpue amsmcuon con and rtludWc IS 1.5 $1,480 o nxnirig w/Oi&M susRm anfi,n plan a,d rc&dWe OS O3 1 $932 o pmpamm®adeoiling Plan and erAedulrfuam 025 1 125 $1.123 a SDCs ins 0 00 o pne O&M saoul update 1 3 2 6 03,855 o provide op,mining 2 3 2.3 73 $6.034 o peryue mouoom •doamrnution 1 2 1 4 $2,771 0 $0 o SOAwam pnpannion/imWlauon/ e M 0 00 so0 configunuon 2 12 149 163 0118.342 sow loading/OAT swung 225 6 825 06.417 ma,rue FAT and suppon 2 4 6 $4.772 Tuk m64aw 4 37 M.15 221.25 1 8 306.4 S23o.235 Subtotal with expenses - $253,259 o RAS/WAS East/plant 2-Replace canal panel&add UPS 2 2 $2.288 o (Iddugadua/mica exiu.doamaueion 3 3 6 $4.727 o poqu dM P&BA(6 una) 6 12 Is $14.315 o fleWue P&IDs a6er Disarm mica 0.73 Im 2 01.614 a ausoa wmkNop wmilan"1.aMim usst sco,ximd.&saq. 1 1 2 $1,576 o Prepart,s0 mmlo and iuue wmbm6cl M. 2 2 $1,974 a aoputu7 Plod 0 00 - pmamign 0 40 meow/O&M svufmdir mn,uinmena 03 03 1 0788 dam peons OS OS 0360 pneJimeopo—e 1 1 $876 pn8m drawings 0 00 Plea drawing 1 2 3 $2.275 panel dee&luaus dnwiop(2 iax) 03 2 4 6.5 06.043 wiringdiegram/Stlnmuicdni inp(2r®a) OS 2 4 6.5 $5.043 armmlondiM=dmn0np(V0H2nela) 2 4 6 04,550 spsifiauom 1 2 1 4 $3,124 81"4 4 HAWaxR1W1C6o0CWC MMtlll.= ATTACHMENT C ORANGE COUNTY - COMPUTER SYSTEM EXPANSION, PLANTS 1 AND 2 ulun-9e ADDENDUM NO3 , LABOR &COSTS "OR a STAFF DAYS) QC Total Mato, TASK Pb 0 EA ID m T4 OS Days Con last w/ staff to it. 0.5 03 1 4 88 foul daigNBaup 0 00 plan 0.1 om 035 $262 pave)ei.&layout 0.1 0.25 0.35 0262 Wcmatic 0.1 0.25 0.35 0262 wm=on dug.(1]O) 0.1 OM 0.35 $262 aisifi.do. 03 0.5 0438 0 peoumnt pmtol 0 00 - pteEasigv 0 00 oust w/0d suff to dixwss natal nano OJ 0.5 1 0788 data gaNs 1 3 4 $2,974 prtli.acqu. 0.3 1 1.5 $1,370 ptuim dmwinga 0 s0 plan dnwing.0 max) 2 4 6 $4,550 elsredonipavd layout dewing 1 2 3 $2,275 wiring diagnsiScnesutic dowings(2 meat 2 4 6 $4,550 wmistion diagram dsaznms(1/0)42 stoat 2 4 6 $4,550 epecifiadom 1 3 1 3 $4,000 last wl0&M saf.miew 1 1 2 $1.576 - fnaldeaigWr p 0 00 plan 0 00 panel elea&layout on am 03 0394 anema0c am 0.25 0.5 $394 wmmunn.diag.(1/O) 03 0.5 1 $788 rysifiwdom 1 1 2 $1,261 o pmaro constrawon oats and spArdule 1.5 1.5 $1,480 0 m.'dog W/ staff wwnrm plan and scnWule 0.5 0.5 1 0932 o prepare mono dealing plan and sNNulessue 02 1 ISS $1,123 o SDC aovim 2 3 3 $5,249 o prepare 0& nta.tals update 1 3 3 9 05.638 o pounds opuame uawog 2 2 01,974 o ,nPas maimew<datvmenwion 1 2 3 11.757 0 00 o Seflwart pmazatioN imallaOON undo, 0 00 - wOwercwnil'tation a 91 99 $71,541 - sofiwart loading/ORT toting 2 6 8 06,170 - aofnvme FAT aM support 2 4 6 $4.772 Task aubioul 4 JJ3 32.9 15r_ 8 D].63 6180,924 sub-tool wn expenses = $1",016 K4 RASIWAS West/plant 2-Replace control panel & add UPS Mmuss,tiom O no W.RAS fazility is al.wo tia to ft PAST RAS Facility(95%) Tasb o Twat art a repeal of Ne EAST RASMAS nuts As.me outs Y 0.33 time Eaa roa Subtotal with expenses = $65,675 KS City Water/plant 1-upgrade,add UPS & FO nenvemr o ficidE gaNs/mica salts.doct me4vstion 1 03 1 2.5 02.282 o prtpart dnfl P&Wea sea) 2 4 6 $4.772 o fmfus P&1Ds aflm District mi. 0.5 0J 1 0843 o aveltl wskahop amIsuia to worn.ask 1 0.5 1.5 $1,425 s,an, ed.&aeq. o plusd.wmV(2 erd wlDkwia wnwrmme 0.3 13 2 04,808 650 O plan dnwivgs R man) 2 4 6 04,550 o wiring e.o. SNmatis dnwings(2 maz) 2 4 6 04, 550 o speci0rauom 1 4 I 6 06,87787) al/94 6 X:IWORMICSOJdOC lu 6att5 ATTACHMENT C ORANGE COUNTY- COMPUTER SYSTEM EXPANSION, PLANTS 1 AND 2 v-2 ADDENDUM No.3 , LABOR &COSTS (LABOR STAFF DAYS) QC iota or TASK M E9 FA E3 E2 T4 OS Day, Out o prepare comuuaim cost and sceedule 1 I 96 o vaaieg W10it l saR to confine pike uW schedule DJ OJ 1 0932 a prepare vwrvo detailing pike end sAMule OS 0.25 0.75 0713 o WC a. 1 2 1 0.5 4.5 $3,631 o Prepare O&M novae's upon: 1 1 0.5 3.5 02.578 0 provide operator training 1 3 4 $3.616 n prepare nudruntaoa doaunnanon OS 1 OS 2 $1,562 0 Software papersuvn•/instaltadoNleaing software configuration(I/O = 92) 1 5 29 20 54 144,600 - software leading/ORT testing 1 3 5 9 $7.113 software FAT and support 1 1 2 4 03,262 o task ede,mistralmn 5 2 7 06.687 Task aubaotal 2 M2 51M 43.5 2J 121.75 5100,7116 Sub-total with expenses = $1101Sb4 R6 Plant Water P S/plant 1-upgrade&add FO convener o feldd -gash./review or doce.00n OJ 1 1.5 01.138 o prepare dNt P&IDe(2 mas) 2 4 6 $4.772 o finalize PASS;after District mica O 5 0.5 &75 $696 o soma.'ksbop wMotri.to confirm task 1 05 1.5 $1,425 reva",som recon o plaparewin,;a pond none wIDisaia mnmrrcrce 1 03 1.5 1 $4,550 o pnndrax'ivgaRmu) 2 4 6 $4,550 o wiringations d$rh.mtic 6reainyR aua) 2 4 6 $4.877 o specifications 1 6 1 6 0 $987 o Prepannare,ls w/0AMdva s. andi co.11NWule 1 1 $932 o nmwg..classifies Pike 'I.and sNetule 0.5 0.3 1 $713 v prepare mono detailing Ann aM athMulc O1 02J 0..5 0631 o SDC se,O& 1 3 1 0.5 3.5 02,578 o Prelate,O&Mname'supdae 1 2 0.5 33 $3,808 o Amide vp.amr viudvg 1 1 OS 4J $1,370 o p.pare mv......^••�daeumentadon OJ 1 IJ 11.370 o Software preperetivn6vtallativnttearing software configuration 11/0 =521 I 5 16 10 027,092 software Iosdingl naing(RELD) 1 3 5 9 $7,113 software FAT and support 1 1 2 4 $3,262 o task administration 5 2 7 $6.687 Task sub-total 2 2225 39.25 33.5 2.5 W.5 $83,031 sub4cfead Wlih expedients; = $91,334 L Factory Demonstration Test Scope: Review F procedures for teling of CRISP/STREA54,INE peciI and servers. And 5 day feaary not in Dublin Ohio. o Review eta produrca aed mnmmt IS IJ S1,480 M o used 5 day factory Ian 5.5 SS $5,426 Task sub+oul ] 9 0 0 0 0 7 ,909 Subaotal with expenses = $9,259 SUMMARY OF TASK COSTS TASK 1 Task N, MMI standards 4147,379 2 PLC Template Standards $106,239 B0.9< 6 M:IWORKw Yc5SWCVD MNR66.%u5 ATTACHMENT C ORANGE COUNTY- COMPUTER SYSTEM EXPANSION,PLANTS 1 AND 2 124a ADDENDUM No.3 , LABOR &COSTS ryABOA�STAFF DAYS) I sal laaor TASK 10 to I El I m T4 w Drys tan oum 3 DOentabOn Standards 54—5 9 4 Headworks MSP $280,701 5 OASES Control Panel $253,259 6 RAS/WAS Pumping, Plant 2 $264,692 7 City Water PS Upgrade $110,864 8 Plant Water PS Upgrade $91,334 9 Factory Demonstration Test $9,259 Total 318,314 BN96 7 mmftN cswmm MM 5.xu ATTACHMENT D SCOPE OF WORK Addendum 3 to Job No. J-31. Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2 I. SUMMARY Provide engineering services for the preparation of construction documents for the replacement of the control panels and upgrading of controls at the following facilities: Plant 1 Headworks and Diversion gates. Control panel at Power Building 3A. • Plant 1, City Water Pump Station control panel • Plant 1, Plant Water Pump Station control panel • Plant 2 Oxygen Plant "Oases" control panel. ° Plant 2 East RAS/WAS control panel. ° Plant 2 West RAS/WAS control panel. Provide construction services for software configuration of the Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs)for the above facilities and forthe configuration of the associated operator computer graphics. Services include installation and testing of the software, operator training and updating of the Operations and Maintenance (O & M) manuals. Develop with input from Districts, staff, standards for the Operator graphic workstations, including symbol libraries, color standards, menu navigation standards, operator workstation procedures, alarm handling procedures, data collection handling and database naming conventions. Develop with input from Districts, staff PLC programming "template" standards and guidelines, for use during this contract, future programming work contracted by the District, and work executed by the District's own staff. Develop with input from Districts' staff, instrumentation and control system drawing standards. II. DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS When used in this document the following terms have the meanings indicated. DEFINITIONS Record Drawings. - A set of drawings prepared on the basis of information compiled and furnished by others, intended as a record of the manner in which the Project was constructed. The Engineer is not responsible for the accuracy of, or any errors or omissions in the information from others, that is incorporated into the record drawings. Record drawings will consist of drawings in hard copy form. Computer generated files on diskette furnished by the Engineer are for the Owner's convenience and to be utilized at the Owner's risk. Standard Software. - Standard software is application and project independent software provided by an equipment manufacturer or software company. It includes but is not limited to operating systems, compilers, utilities, text editors, diagnostic and debugging aids. It also includes Process Monitoring and Control software packages designed for monitoring and alarming, man-machine interface, data collection and report generation. ABBREVIATIONS The following abbreviations are used in the text: P&ID Process and Instrumentation Diagram PLC Programmable Logic Controller III. DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK TASK N: OPERATOR GRAPHICS STANDARDS Develop graphics standards as listed below, based on the Square D, "CRISP" operator interface software package and implemented on DEC workstations running OPEN VMS. Translate the standards across to the Square D STREAMLINE" software packages implemented on a PC. The "STREAMLINE" graphics to be derived directly from the "CRISP" graphics. The operator procedures to be made as consistent as possible between the two software packages. Conduct up to 10 half day workshops with District staff to obtain input to standards and operator screen procedures and to review example screens. The standards to include: " Graphic symbol library for common equipment. Develop up to twenty individual symbols to represent a variety of types of pumps, valves, tanks, mixers, primary sensors, compressors and fans. Define dynamic color changing, alarm indication, labeling and linking to the PLC logic. " Conventions for using color to represent equipment status, alarms, chemical and process flow streams. " Standards for displaying equipment status. Define how equipment "Local/Remote" and "Auto/Manual"status is indicated, and operator sequence for displaying Auto/Manual station sub-windows. • Screen layouts for typical screen types. Including overview graphic, detail process graphic, equipment configuration graphic, sequence monitoring graphic, data summary screens, alarm log and alarm history screens, event logs, trend displays and report screens. Define and create operator tool-bars. Define and create examples showing the use of "check buttons", bar graph indicators, dialog boxes, setpoint entry fields and alarm messages. ° Definition of screen menu hierarchy and operator options for navigating through screen sequences. Develop a logical menu system that allows the operator to reach critical screens with the minimum number of key strokes and quickly access relevant data. • Conventions for use of screen fonts, text sizing and color. " Development of standard Auto/Manual face-plates for both discrete and analog equipment and loop control. Develop bar graphs to represent setpoint, measured and controlled variables and keypads to allow the operator to select alternative modes including Manual, Semi-auto, Auto, and Cascade. " Conventions for use of pop-up sub-windows. Develop examples as necessary. Typical sub-windows for equipment or process configuration options, help information and preset trends. " Operator alarm handling procedures. Definitions of alarm priorities. Discuss general class of alarms for Critical, High Priority, Priority and Low Priority alarms. Provide typical examples of each class. " Conventions for access security levels and passwords. Develop matrix showing available access to both operations functions and programming software functions for operations supervisory staff, operators, casual users, maintenance staff, programming staff and system administrator. Describe code implementation of the matrix. Deliver example screens for both CRISP and STREAMLINE packages and link to the PLC templates developed in Task P, where applicable. Simulate and test these linkages to prove integrity. Detail standards in a series of "Software Standard" document sheets that can be used as a reference for future Districts software development projects and be updated by plant personnel as necessary. TASK P: PLC TEMPLATE STANDARDS/ CONTROL STANDARDS Conduct up to 10 half day workshops with District staff to obtain input on control options, strategies, and software documentation conventions and to review examples. These workshops will document the common philosophy to be applied throughout both plants when each facility is upgraded to full control. Guidelines will cover recommended "local' operator controls to be made available for each type of equipment, typical hardware/software interlocking and alarming. Define the required sequencing for Lead/Lag/Standby pumping. Include reclassification of pump duties after pump failure and operator sequences for changing duties while pumps are running. Develop, configure and test control algorithms for ten commonly used control strategies, as listed below, based on the guidelines documented during the first workshops. These form the PLC template standards. Link the templates to the example graphics developed as part of Task N. The following templates will be developed: 1. Control and alarming of variable speed pumps 2. Control and alarming of fixed speed pumps 3. Control and alarming of modulating valves 4. Control and alarming of electric open/close valves 5. Control and alarming of pneumatic open/close valves 6. Chemical addition using flow pacing. Variable speed dosing pump. 7. Chemical addition with closed loop feed-back control from an analyzer. 8. Typical closed loop pressure (flow, level) control 9. Lead/Lag1/Lag2/Standby pump control with constant speed pumps 10. Lead/Lag1/Lag2/Standby pump control with variable speed pumps. Deliver to the Districts a set of 10 ladder templates fully documented using the Taylor software documentation package, and a set of associated control strategy narratives. Provide electronic files for both ladders and narrative. TASK Q: DOCUMENTATION STANDARDS Develop drawing standards for instrumentation and control system documentation. Conduct three half day workshops with District to obtain staff input and to review draft standards. Develop standards for the following: • Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs). ° Loop Diagrams • Equipment interconnection wiring diagrams " Instrument tagging • Equipment tagging " Plant wire and cable numbering systems Deliver to the Districts, one review and one final set of AutoCAD version 10 example P&IDs, Loop Diagrams, and Interconnection Wiring Diagrams in both hardcopy and electronic form. Deliver three "Document Standards" sheets describing the minimum requirements for the three types of I&C drawings. Deliver four"Document Standards" sheets describing the required tagging for instruments, equipment, wires, and control and data communication cables. TASK K1: PLANT No.1 HEADWORKS. PANEL REPLACEMENT AND CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE. Provide engineering services for the development of specifications for the replacement of the Plant No.1 Headworks control panel at Power Building 3A and the upgrading of the existing monitoring system to full control. Provide for remote automatic control of the diversion gates at the headworks influent and conversion of the grit chamber discharge gates from manual control to automatic remote control. The following tasks to be completed: ° Review existing headworks plant installation and documentation. • Prepare record Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) based on District verified documentation. • Review the headworks hydraulics as necessary to enable a recommendation to be developed for a new pump control strategy designed to reduce the transient upsets currently being experienced in the primary basins. • Conduct a half day workshop with the Districts' staff to confirm scope of work, and discuss recommended new control strategy. Develop a plan for a change-over sequence which will allow the removal and replacement of the old control panel while maintaining processing. Discuss options and implementation for upgrading headworks to full control. ° Prepare a Technical memo summarizing workshop results. Submit draft for District review, update and issue. • Prepare specifications and drawings for construction of temporary control panel and contractor work necessary to allow old panel removal and temporary panel installation. ° Prepare specifications and drawings for permanent replacement control panel. Include upgrading of gate controls and new field wiring. Submit for Districts review and update as required. ° Prepare construction cost estimate and a project schedule ° Update P&IDs to reflect the new design and provide District with hardcopy and AutoCad version 10 electronic files. ° Provide up to six days construction support to the District. Services as detailed in paragraph Vlll, "Construction Support Services" of the Contract Documents The scope of work excludes any upgrading of the Headworks Scrubber control panel. TASK K2: PLANT No.2 OXYGEN FACILITY. PANEL REPLACE- MENT AND CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE. Provide engineering services for the development of specifications for the replacement of the Plant No.2 oxygen facility "OASES" control panel. The following tasks to be completed: " Review existing Plant 2 oxygen plant control system installation and documentation. " Prepare record Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) based on District verified documentation. • Compare the installed monitoring and controls with the guidelines developed as part of Task C. " Conduct a half day workshop with the Districts' staff to confirm scope of work, and discuss any recommended changes to the controls. Develop a plan for a change-over sequence which will allow the removal and replacement of the old control panel while maintaining processing. ° Prepare a Technical memo summarizing workshop results. Submit draft for District review, update and issue. " Prepare specifications and drawings for construction of temporary control panel and contractor work necessary to allow old panel removal and temporary panel installation. " Prepare specifications and drawings for permanent replacement control panel. Submit for Districts review and update as required. " Prepare construction cost estimate and a project schedule. ° Update P&IDs to reflect the new design and provide District with hardcopy and AutoCad version 10 electronic files. " Provide up to six days construction support to the District. Services as detailed in paragraph Vill, "Construction Support Services" of the Contract Documents TASK K3: PLANT No.2 EAST RASIWAS FACILITY. CONTROL PANEL REPLACEMENT AND CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE. Provide engineering services for the development of specifications for the replacement of the existing Plant No.2 East RAS/WAS control panel. The following tasks to be completed: " Review existing Plant 2 East RASIWAS control system installation and documentation. • Prepare record Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) based on District verified documentation. • Compare the installed monitoring and controls with the guidelines developed as part of Task C. ° Conduct a half day workshop with the Districts' staff to confirm scope of work, and discuss any recommended changes to the controls. Develop a plan for a change-over sequence which will allow the removal and replacement of the old control panel while maintaining processing. • Prepare a Technical memo summarizing workshop results. Submit draft for District review, update and issue. • Prepare specifications and drawings for construction of temporary control panel and contractor work necessary to allow old panel removal and temporary panel installation. ° Prepare specifications and drawings for permanent replacement control panel. Submit for Districts review and update as required. ° Prepare construction cost estimate and a project schedule. • Update P&IDs to reflect the new design and provide District with hardcopy and AutoCAD version 10 electronic files. ° Provide up to five days construction support to the District. Services as detailed in paragraph Vlll, "Construction Support Services" of the Contract Documents TASK K4: PLANT No.2 WEST RASIWAS FACILITY. CONTROL PANEL REPLACEMENT AND CONTROL SYSTEM UPGRADE. Provide engineering services for the development of specifications for the replacement of the existing Plant No.2 West RASANAS control panel. Assume that the required upgrade for the West RASANAS is essentially the same as for the East RASIWAS. The following tasks to be completed: ° Review existing Plant 2 West RASANAS control system installation and documentation. ° Prepare record Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) based on District verified documentation. • Conduct a half day workshop with the Districts' staff to confirm scope of work, and discuss any recommended changes to the controls. • Prepare a Technical memo summarizing workshop results. Submit draft for District review, update and issue. ° Prepare specifications and drawings for construction of temporary control panel and contractor work necessary to allow old panel removal and temporary panel installation. Assume these are essentially the same as for the East RASANAS controls. Prepare specifications and drawings for permanent replacement control panel. Submit for Districts review and update as required. Assume these are essentially the same as for the East RASNVAS controls. • Prepare construction cost estimate and a project schedule. • Update P&IDs to reflect the new design and provide District with hardcopy and AutoCAD version 10 electronic files. • Provide up to two days construction support to the District, Services as detailed in paragraph Vill, "Construction Support Services" of the Contract Documents. TASK K5: PLANT No.1 CITY WATER PUMP STATION. CONTROLS AND CONTROL PANEL UPGRADE. Provide engineering services for the development of specifications for the upgrading of the existing Plant No.1 City Water Pump Station controls. The following tasks to be completed: • Review existing Plant No.1 City Water Pump Station control system installation and documentation. • Prepare record Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) based on District verified documentation. • Conduct a half day workshop with the Districts' staff to confirm scope of work, and discuss any recommended changes to the controls. • Prepare a Technical memo summarizing workshop results. Submit draft for District review, update and issue. • Prepare specifications and drawings for modifications to the existing control panel, PLC rack and modules. Submit for Districts review and update as required. • Prepare construction cost estimate and a project schedule. • Update P&IDs to reflect the new design and provide District with hardcopy and AutoCAD version 10 electronic files. ° Develop a plan for installation and testing of the upgraded PLC software . The plan to minimizes interruption to processing. Specify any required temporary panels and connections. Provide up to four days construction support to the District. Services as detailed in paragraph VIII, "Construction Support Services" of the Contract Documents, TASK K6: PLANT No.1 PLANT WATER PUMP STATION. CONTROLS AND CONTROL PANEL UPGRADE. Provide engineering services for the development of specifications for the upgrading of the existing Plant No.1 Plant Water Pump Station controls. The following tasks to be completed: • Review existing Plant No.1, Plant Water Pump Station control system installation and documentation. • Prepare record Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) based on District verified documentation. ° Conduct a half day workshop with the Districts' staff to confirm scope of work, and discuss any recommended changes to the controls. ° Prepare a Technical memo summarizing workshop results. Submit draft for District review, update and issue. ° Prepare specifications and drawings for modifications to the existing control panel, PLC rack and modules. Submit for Districts review and update as required. • Prepare construction cost estimate and a project schedule. ° Update P&IDs to reflect the new design and provide District with hardcopy and AutcCAD version 10 electronic files. ° Develop a plan for installation and testing of the upgraded PLC software . The plan to minimizes interruption to processing. Specify any required temporary panels and connections. ° Provide up to four days construction support to the District. Services as detailed in paragraph VIII, "Construction Support Services" of the Contract Documents. TASK L1: PLANT No.1 HEADWORKS CONSTRUCTION. SOFTWARE INTEGRATION SERVICES. Provide construction phase software integration services for the configuration of software for the new headworks programmable logic controller and CRISP and STREAMLINE operator graphics. Configure up to 4 CRISP graphics and 4 STREAMLINE graphic screens. Software configuration to be based on the standards developed in Tasks N and P. The following tasks to be completed: • Review existing PLC program and operator graphics. Identify code associated with all equipment, field devices and operator inputs. List to ensure the new program to be develop includes all these devices. • Prepare preliminary pencil sketches of proposed graphics screens. • Prepare a narrative description of new control algorithms developed as part of task K1. • Conduct a half day workshop with Districts staff to review graphics and discuss descriptions of the new control algorithms. • Prepare 4 passive CRISP operator graphic screens and review with district. • Configure PLC and review with District. Document the program using the Taylor software documentation package. • Configure the passive CRISP screens to make them dynamic. Link screens to the PLC. ° Develop 4 STREAMLINE operator graphic screens to closely resemble the equivalent CRISP operator screen and link to the PLC. ° Wire test input/output switches, pushbuttons and lights to the PLC to simulate field devices. Test PLC program in conjunction with both CRISP and STREAMLINE operator graphics. Review tests with the Districts. ° After installation of the replacement control panel and testing by the Contractor, install software. Test new instakation in conjunction with the District's Staff, both off and on-line. • Provide Operator training on new software and control strategies. • Update O&M manuals to reflect the changes made to the panels and control strategies. TASK L2: PLANT No.2 OXYGEN FACILITY CONSTRUCTION. SOFTWARE INTEGRATION SERVICES. Provide construction phase software integration services for the configuration of software for the new oxygen facility "OASES" replacement panel programmable logic controller. Prepare operator graphics using both the CRISP and STREAMLINE software packages and link to the programmable logic controller. Pre-test the combined system. Configure up to 4 CRISP graphics and 4 STREAMLINE graphic screens. The following tasks to be completed: ° Review existing PLC program and operator graphics. Identify code associated with all equipment, field devices and operator inputs. List to ensure the new program to be develop includes all these devices. • Prepare preliminary pencil sketches of proposed graphics screens. Conduct a half day workshop with Districts staff to review graphics and discuss descriptions of the upgraded controls. ° Prepare 4 passive CRISP operator graphic screens and review with district. • Configure PLC and review with District. Document the program using the Taylor software documentation package. ° Configure the passive CRISP screens to make them dynamic. Link screens to the PLC. ° Develop 4 STREAMLINE operator graphic screens to closely resemble the equivalent CRISP operator screen and link to the PLC. ° Wire test input/output switches, pushbuttons and lights to the PLC to simulate field devices. Test PLC program in conjunction with both CRISP and STREAMLINE operator graphics. ° After installation of the replacement control panel and testing by the Contractor, install software. Test new installation in conjunction with the District's Staff, both off and on-line. ° Provide Operator training on new software and control strategies. • Update 0&M manuals to reflect the changes made to the panels and control strategies. TASK L3: PLANT No.2 EAST RASIWAS FACILITY CONSTRUCTION. SOFTWARE INTEGRATION SERVICES. Provide construction phase software integration services for the configuration of software for the new East RAS/WAS facility replacement panel programmable logic controller. Develop operator graphics for CRISP and STREAMLINE software packages and link to the PLC database. Pre-test the combined system. Configure up to 4 CRISP graphics and 4 STREAMLINE graphic screens. The following tasks to be completed: ° Review existing PLC program and operator graphics. Identify code associated with all equipment, field devices and operator inputs. List to ensure the new program to be develop includes all these devices. • Prepare preliminary pencil sketches of proposed graphics screens. • Prepare a narrative description of any new control algorithms required. • Conduct a half day workshop with Districts staff to review graphics and discuss upgrading of the controls. • Prepare 4 passive CRISP operator graphic screens and review with district. • Configure PLC and review with District. Document software usiny the Taylor software documentation package. Configure the passive CRISP screens to make them dynamic. Link screens to the PLC. ° Develop 4 STREAMLINE operator graphic screens to closely resemble the equivalent CRISP operator screen and link to the PLC. Wire test input/output switches, pushbuttons and lights to the PLC to simulate field devices. Test PLC program in conjunction with both CRISP and STREAMLINE operator graphics. ° After installation of the replacement control panel and testing by the Contractor, install software. Test new installation in conjunction with the District's Staff, both off and on-line. • Provide Operator training on new software and control strategies. ° Update O&M manuals to reflect the changes made to the panels and control strategies. TASK L4: PLANT No.2 WEST RASIWAS FACILITY CONSTRUCTION. SOFTWARE INTEGRATION SERVICES. Provide construction phase software integration services for the configuration of software for the new WEST RAS/WAS facility replacement panel programmable logic controller. Develop operator graphics for CRISP and STREAMLINE software packages and link to the PLC database. Pre-test the combined system. Configure up to 4 CRISP graphics and 4 STREAMLINE graphic screens. Assume the configuration of the East RAS/WAS software is essentially the same as for the West RAS/WAS. The following tasks to be completed: Review existing PLC program and operator graphics. Identify code associated with all equipment, field devices and operator inputs. List to ensure the new program to be develop includes all these devices. Prepare 4 passive CRISP operator graphic screens and review with district. ° Configure PLC and review with District ° Develop the passive CRISP screens to make them dynamic. Link screens to the PLC. ° Develop 4 STREAMLINE operator graphic screens to closely resemble the equivalent CRISP operator screen and link to the PLC. ° Wire test input/output switches, pushbuttons and lights to the PLC to simulate field devices. Test PLC program in conjunction with both CRISP and STREAMLINE operator graphics. • After installation of the replacement control panel and testing by the Contractor, install software. Test new installation in conjunction with the District's Staff, both off and on-line. TASK L5: PLANT No.1 CITY WATER PUMP STATION. CONTROLS AND CONTROL PANEL UPGRADE. Provide construction phase software integration services for the configuration of new software for the City Water Pump Station programmable logic controller. Develop operator graphics for CRISP software packages and link to the PLC database. The following tasks to be completed: ° Review existing PLC program and operator graphics. Identify code associated with all equipment, field devices and operator inputs. List to ensure the new program to be develop includes all these devices. • Prepare preliminary pencil sketches of proposed graphics screens. • Prepare a narrative description of any new control algorithms required. • Conduct a half day workshop with Districts staff to review graphics and discuss upgrading of the controls. • Prepare 4 passive CRISP operator graphic screens and review with district. • Configure PLC and review with District. Document the program using the Taylor software documentation package. ° Configure the passive CRISP screens to make them dynamic. Link screens to the PLC. • Wire test input/output switches, pushbuttons and lights to the PLC to simulate field devices. Test PLC program in conjunction with the CRISP operator graphics. • After upgrading of the control panel and testing by the Contractor, install software. Test new installation in conjunction with the District's Staff, both off and on-line. • Provide Operator training on new software and control strategies. ° Update O&M manuals to reflect the changes made to the panels and control strategies. TASK L6: PLANT No.1 PLANT WATER PUMP STATION. CONTROLS UPGRADE. Provide construction phase software integration services for the configuration of new software for the Plant Water Pump Station programmable logic controller. Develop operator graphics for CRISP software packages and link to the PLC database. Configure up to 4 CRISP graphics. The following tasks to be completed: • Review existing PLC program and operator graphics. Identify code associated with all equipment, field devices and operator inputs. List to ensure the new program to be develop includes all these devices. • Prepare preliminary pencil sketches of proposed graphics screens. ° Prepare a narrative description of any new control algorithms required. ° Conduct a half day workshop with Districts staff to review graphics and discuss upgrading of the controls. ° Prepare 4 passive CRISP operator graphic screens and review with district. ° Configure PLC and review with District. Document program using the Taylor software documentation package. • Develop the passive CRISP screens to make them dynamic. Link screens to the PLC. • Wire test input/output switches, pushbuttons and lights to the PLC to simulate field devices. Test PLC program in conjunction with the CRISP operator graphics. • After installation of the upgraded control panel and testing by the Contractor, install software. Test new installation in conjunction with the District's Staff, both off and on-line. • Provide Operator training on new software and control strategies. Update 0&M manuals to reflect the changes made to the panels and control strategies. IV SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FACILITY A software development system will be made available to the Engineer by the District for software configuration, including a Modicon PLC, DEC and PC based workstations configured for software development, and test racks suitable for simulating PLC inputs and outputs. The District will also provide the Engineer with the manufacturer's standard software development packages for PLC software (Taylor), and Square D "CRISP" and "STREAMLINE" graphics. The standard software licenses and the software manufacturer's support provided as part of the software manufacturer's license agreement with the District will apply equally to software configuration executed by the Engineer on behalf of the District. V SCHEDULE The "not to exceed"fee and fixed profit indicated as compensation to the Engineer for work described by this addendum will apply for a period of 24 months from July 1, 1994. In the event that work under this addendum is required to be completed after the 24 month period has expired, the Engineer has the right to re-negotiate the fees and profit affected by the time change. e , 1989 Master Plan °2020 Vision" • "This plan has been prepared to guide the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) in planning the long-term development of its monitoring and control system... The intent for the system is to meet CSDOC's near-term needs and be expandable to meet CSDOC's future requirements." Source: Collection, Treatment, and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, Vol 5, Computer Control Monitoring and Data Handling Systems, February 1989, Chapter 1 , 1 .1 Introduction, pg. 1-1 . February 1989 -- "2020 Vision Master Plan" July- Design contract awarded to EMA Services, Inc. for August 1989 -- Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation, Job. No. J-23-2 and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job. No. 132-44 (combined) March 1991 -- Notice Inviting Bids for Job No. J-23-2 and Job No. 132-44 July 1991 -- Contract awarded to HSQ Technology, Inc. Cost to date: $4.10 Million April 1993 -- Award Professional Services Agreement to CH2M Hill April 1993 Professional Services Agreement awarded to CH2M Hill for Computer Systems Expansion, Job No. J-31 . Total design cost estimated: $.68 Million • Tasks: ► Integrate FT-100 Computers at Central Generation at Plants 1 and 2 ► Replace Fisher & Porter computer system at Ocean Outfall Booster Station ► Integrate all Field Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) into Existing HSQ System April 1993 Professional Services Agreement awarded to CH2M Hill for Computer Systems Expansion, Job No. J-31 . Total design cost estimated: $.68 Million • Tasks: continued ► Addition Graphics ► Replace Fisher & Porter Influent Metering System ► Merge Remote Pump Station Telemetry System into Main System July 1993 Staff and CH2M Hill become concerned . . . "Will the HSQ system meet the Districts ' long-term needs?" December 1993 Addendum 1 to Expansion of Existing Computer Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31 , CH2M Hill 1 . Evaluate the existing HSO system. 2. Perform a needs analysis. 3. Clarify the status of: ► Existing system ► Future expansion needs ► Organizational support 4. Evaluation of the existing installed systems and their expansion or upgrade capability. March 1994 Options presented by CH21VI Hill 1 . Integrate remainder of plant into existing HSO system. System would grind to a halt. 2. Integrate remainder of plant into a modified HSO system. Would meet short-term needs but not long-term needs. 3. Eliminate part of HSO system, upgrade to newer hardware and migrate to CRISP software. Would meet short-term and long-term needs. Recommended solution. Job No: J-31 -1 1 . Expands Fiber Optic Data HI-WAY ► Ethernet ► Modbus Plus ► A-B DH + 2. Provides Multiple Connection Points for Easy Expansion New J-31 -3ADDM Continued L. Plant 1 Headworks Upgrade ► Remote Operation M . Plant 2 Secondary Upgrade ► Remote Operation N. Plant 1 Plant & City Water Upgrade ► Remote Operation Why CRISP 32 • Proven Track Record • Service • Wastewater Experience • Established Company • Expandability March 1994 CH2M Hill Addendum 1 • Reported : ► Identified the Need for a Course Change to Realign Project Because . . . July 1994: Option 3 Initiated Now Authorized : • 2 Vax 4700A for Plant 1 10 Software Site License for CRISP 32 CH2M Hill 's Amended Role 1 . Continue engineering and programming support to automate the plant. 2 . Establish software and hardware standards. 3 . Providing on-site teaming with staff. 4. Train staff. Recommendation of Special Selection Committee Re Computers • Approve Addendum No. 3 to Job No. J-31 , Expansion of Computer and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2 Addendum Consists of Two Parts: ► Traditional Design Engineering, Not-to-Exceed $ 5329300 ► Software Integration Services, Not-to-Exceed 785,900 Total, Not-to-Exceed $1 ,318,200 • Increasing the Proposed Total Authorized Contract Not-to-Exceed Amount Including Direct Expenses, Overhead and Fixed Profit to $2,060,348 COMP(JTERIZAMN.OFPLAKI LU raMIRNIM&AUTOR'nor►' WROVE MENIM SUGGETSILMMY 1990 1. ImWI HSO Cmgeae Mancrep System and fber opticmYnlc Q10M .$,.00M. Killen 1994 Pnaswney etue 15%Redlard30%Piad2 1993 2- Job J31 awarded b0 CH2pIH01,Etrttmsion of F-ThAM Cnanpa7M s0.1/M -00.07 M $0.20 M MwAorhq and Control Systems at Pfaada 1 and 7- 1994 3. JM AdclaMaa NM 1,HSO an i Caned Systen,RevisaerN - 7003M 30.02 M Mill M E7Nratlwn7,17-7 aF 7777 FUTURE AMOMZM WORK •. ?99" 4. Completion of nemalning J31.System Deslgwand-1 7p1Mae11YWmy UM M I UM MI W43 M July 5. PumhesaCRISP SoXWam Site Lkeae,bdh Plents ' ..0=M VIMM 40A4M 79M 6. Pulcha Digits!Equipment.VAX Cmtpnder EgldFwd '.SPADM MA m August 7. J31 Addedurn Ms.3 7080M .30mm wam 1994 , a Developinbeticallanstendsma b. Os egn plan br modemga erM rertamN mdmn9 dbSOMRead. . high rums Instan tadatbn . e M1OecdlwmaPladpmjaffi hncMtirgiderychmet . B. hmteN Addtloml Fiber Optic Nofaerkeld Cmrvnatlea0a10Equlp $M70 M SMM 4dA0-M Sept 9. Computer System Setup end Factory Test(ROOS&G) '1 -"IA $0A4 M 10. RmMdd 011koB Oevebprtrerd Lab.lw.Piwd Andmatlm.(lmtlp '409M 30.VM 19945 if. InNeI CRISPlJ2 Tminbg for SleH t10.WM f0.09'M Ongcing 12 Upgrade wd consolidate PLC.(Per #7) - 1p.055M SM78M $120M Work -hdegratton Servions CHHMHJU $0.tsM 70.12M tlmr 1996 13 Padlme OIOW Equpmed VAX C MularEp$r(Per/2) $0.24M $0.24M 14. Ccsrpll System Setup and Factory Ted(Ra/11) $0.04M 30M'M TS. Repmu Ocean O A Sawtm SMbn DCS(Pw 02 A 7) - 40.MM $0.60M 16. Aulnate Plane 1 Heodrwlq Oaayn(Per/7) 0DA5 M $0.65 M -h7Begraflorr Servkes CF12011110 70.20 M 17. PLC(Pa/7) M >r-7/M t9 Reidvemdmadiysscmday0eamnstpmovs, Wng Sa.20M M ."m mmuna�lanew wdnmt sydemm(ram:>) - -tnmgmuon Servines CH2WU - 98.30M 19. 125%CdrNngeney Fucl 47.W M 80.M ft.M m cumildinniza Ongtlrg M. Meauman Stemn9(Already&dgetnd) 50.31 M So 7 M R sacl Au eA 17.1994 June 2.1994 PRESENTATION HIGHLIGHTS • What is being proposed? • Why is it needed? • What will be automated now? • Is this cost effective? • Will this proposal provide for future needs? • What will be the amended J-31 Contract deliverables ? • What will all of this accomplish? • Why do this now? 8/25/94 1 What is being proposed ? • An Amendment of the J-31 contract with CH2M Hill • Change of direction resulting from our report that recommended changing from the HSQ system to CRISP/DEC • Includes design and installation support for software and hardware to automate two process as a "pilot" and four "mission critical" processes and one labor intensive process • Includes a major effort in the area of standards development for software, hardware and control device programming . • Hardware to be purchased and installed separately (not in this amendment) 8/25/94 2 Why is it needed ? • Current HSQ system barely meets current needs as configured, can't meet future needs • HSQ system could be modified to meet current needs but can't meet future needs • Investing now to change direction will pay dividends in the future as the need for more automation increases • Full monitoring of all processes is needed to assure safety and operations integrity • Automation of "mission critical" processes greatly improves reliability 8/25/94 3 w N (17 • • C ^ CD C CD Cf)T (n D 0 � � m Cn c) m CD n D Cn c (n Cf) C CD tD 3 Cl) 0 What will be automated now? • Two processes will be automated first as a "pilot" • One very manpower intensive process will be automated • An additional four "mission critical" process will then be fully automated • All processes will be centrally monitored 8/25/94 5 Initial processes to be automated • Pilot Projects to test concepts — Plant 1 City Water Pump Station — Plant 1 Plant Water Pump Station • Manpower Intensive Process — Plant 1 Headworks and Diversion Gates 8/25/94 6 The four " mission critical process" to be automated • Plant 2 East Return Activated Sludge/Waste Activated Sludge (RAS/WAS) • Plant 2 West RAS/WAS • Plant 2 Oxygen Plant • Ocean Outfall Booster Pump Station (OOBS) 8/25/94 7 Is this cost effective ? • Seven operations will be consolidated into one • Five fewer staff will be needed • Power and materials cost savings through tighter operation control will be realized • Maintenance savings will be realized • Future automation costs will be reduced • Future full automation of other processes not in this project will to subjected to cost effective analysis 8/25/94 8 Will this proposal provide for future needs? • Processes to be automated are consistent with past planning efforts • Framework to automate more in the future • Provides a migration path to next generation of hardware/software — Open architecture systems coming — provisions for migration to "streamline', CRISP's next major release — Current design will incorporate features using early modules of "Streamline" 8/25/94 9 Will this proposal provide for future needs? • CRISP has guaranteed supporting this release for at least 10 years • CRISP site License includes version upgrades for 5 1 /2 years • Establishing standards now will minimize future cost of maintenance and expansion. . .the standards become the "plan" 8/25/94 10 What will be the amended J -31 Contract deliverables? • Drawings and Specs for needed hardware modifications • Software and operations standards • Technical support as the hardware is installed • On-site teaming with staff to smoothly migrate from existing to new software and hardware • On-site software Integration Services 8/25/94 11 What is "Software Systems Integration" . • There is no such thing as an "off the shelf" solution" • CRISP software "out of the box" must be configured to your system • Software code must be written to create the screen displays that allow the operators to operate and monitor the plant. • The "code" is never seen by the operators but is "behind the scenes" in every action the computer takes. 8/25/94 12 What is "Software Systems Integration" ? • The existing Programmable Logic Controllers (PI-Cs) must all be programmed to work with the CRISP software control package • These are not a trivial tasks. About 70 screens will be designed and thousands of lines of underlying computer code and PLC logic code will be created, tested, and debugged 8/25/94 13 What are Software and Operations Standards ? • Standard ways of controlling plant devices will be decided and documented • Hundreds of standard code "pieces" called macros and templates will be created for each typical operating situation (like controlling a chemical feed or opening and closing a valve) • Screen Standards will be created 8/25/94 14 Standards for how thing "happen" on screen will be determined • Screen color codes will be establish for all possible operating conditions. • Standard tool bars will be developed • Standard ways of "navigating" thru the screens will be determined • This will provide predictability in computer system response plant-wide 8/25/94 15 Why are standards needed ? • To allow consistent operation throughout the plants • To simplify trouble shooting and maintenance • To improve reliability • To enhance and minimize operator training • To prevent future chaos as the system is expanded • To allow all parts of the plants to communicate information that will enhance operations 8/25/94 16 What will all of this accomplish ? • Full automation of seven major processes • Central monitoring of all processes • Control system standards • Training • A framework to allow future automation of other processes • The ability to tie other Information Management Systems in (Laboratory and Plant Maintenance) 8/25/94 17 Why do this now? • Ongoing capital projects require immediate automation decisions • Existing equipment is 20 year old technology which no longer provides needed functionality • Replacement parts for existing equipment no longer available • Reliability is decreasing • Absence of standards will further deteriorate system performance and increase costs 8/25/94 18 J -31 in context DEVELOP SYSTEM STANDARDS AUTOMATE PLANT 1 AUTOMATE SEVEN WHERE COST PROCESSES EFFECTIVE CRISP SITE FULL MONITORING AUTOMATE LICENSE OF PLANT PLANT 2 AGREEMENT 1 & 2 V WHERE COST EFFECTIVE MIGRATE FROM HSQ PROVIDE FUTURE OPEN PATHWAY TO ARCHITECTURE FUTURE SYSTEMS J-31 FUTURE CONTRACT 8/25/94 19 Automation Strategy Candidate Control Projects FULL PARTIAL MONITORING Secmdary Treatment Dgester Control Influent Meted Oty & Plant Water Gas Compressors Rares Headworks Dewatefi Ocean Outfall Booster Purrp Station Scnbmrs Truck Loading PhysicaVCheMad 8/25/94 20 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127 a 1ge44 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING DATE AUGUST 24, 1994 AT 5:30 P.M. A meeting of the Executive Subcommittee Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on Wednesday, August 24,1994, at 5:30 p.m., at the Districts' Administrative offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: EXECUTIVE SUBCOMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: A. B. Catlin, Past Joint Chairman Larry Seigel, Ernst& Young John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman Mike Klein, Ernst& Young John Collins Mani Mani, Ernst& Young John Gullixson Sal Sapien STAFF PRESENT: Absent: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Blake P. Anderson, Director of Engineering Barry Hammond Roger Stanton APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 26, 1994 MEETING. The minutes of the July 26, 1994, Executive Subcommittee were approved as drafted. STATUS REPORT RE PHASE 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGEMENT FUNCTION IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION. Phase 2 is to Implement the Ernst & Young Phase I Capital Projects Management Process recommendations, and to conduct an Evaluation of the Operations and Maintenance Functions. Utilizing the enclosed (white) Capital Management Focused Improvement Project outline, Ernst& Young representatives reviewed the status of the Phase 2 Capital Projects Management Function Improvements Implementation. An Improvement team of"project manager" level staff representing the various departments has been formed. Ernst &Young reported that they are very pleased with the staff participation and the progress of Phase 2. It is a positive process and many good ideas are evolving. Minutes of Executive Subcommittee Meeting Page 2 August 24, 1994 A major change that is developing is the formation of project teams comprised of representatives from all affected departments to oversee projects from beginning to end (from planning to design, through construction and start-up), to replace the current system of having one group in charge of design and then turning the project over to a separate group for the construction phase. New procedures will also be implemented and project management and accountability defined. Needed staffing resources to effectively manage the new system will also be addressed. Ernst & Young also reported that they would begin work next week on the Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance Functions, a task originally identified for Phase 3 that was included in the Phase 2 work by the Directors. The Committee members, Ernst & Young representatives and staff discussed existing practices and the new proposals, and how to optimize effectiveness of the capital projects function. No action was required, since this was a status report only. PHASE 3 WORK PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL OPERATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL STUDIES. At the August 10th Joint Board meeting, the Directors authorized the Executive Subcommittee to review the Phase 3 Work Plan for Additional Operational and Organizational Studies with Ernst & Young after the early Phase 2 work had commenced, and following that review to submit a recommendation to the Executive Committee at its regular meeting scheduled for September 28, 1994, on the operational and organizational issues that should be considered for further study in Phase 3. Following its review of the Subcommittee recommendation, the Executive Committee is to submit its recommendation to the Joint Boards for consideration at their regular meeting on October 12, 1994. Enclosed is a copy of the Ernst & Young letter (pink) dated July 25, 1994, regarding Phase 3 operational and organizational issues. (Note: Originally, the Executive Committee was not scheduled to meet in August but now has a meeting on August 25th.) The Subcommittee reviewed the Phase 3 identified tasks with Ernst & Young representatives and staff and discussed which tasks should be done and their respective priorities. Staff identified the computerization programs as a major priority. Given the Districts' primary mission of operating the treatment facilities in strict compliance with our NPDES ocean discharge permit and a wide array of laws and regulatory requirements for environmental and public health protection, computerized plant monitoring and :y Minutes of Executive Subcommittee Meeting Page 3 August 24, 1994 control is extremely important to our ability to most effectively operate the treatment plants. Staff further reported that the Directors' Special Selection Committee Re Computers had met last week and is submitting a report to the Executive Committee at their August 25th meeting, recommending: (a) three actions pertaining to plant automation computerization: (1) Square D factory configuration of CRISP/32 software and DEC hardware, (2) Addendum No. 2 to Job No. J-31, Expansion of Computer Control System; and (3) Standardization Re Modicon Programmable Logic Controllers; and (b) the formation of a staff Plant Automation Group, subject to a report by Ernst &Young (see following item). Staff also reported that with the complexity and rapidly changing technology relative to computerization, there is an evolving practice of obtaining "third"opinions on proposed computer systems. Staff believes this is a good idea and had asked Ernst & Young to determine the level of effort and cost to perform a subset of Task 6 to address the above two issues. This was reviewed with the Committee and staff recommended that Ernst & Young be engaged to study both of said proposals that have been under consideration by the Computer Committee and that are scheduled to be considered by the Executive Committee. It was the consensus of the Subcommittee that the above proposed three actions under (a) should proceed. See following item re (b) pertaining to Plant Automation Group. Staff also identified Task 4, Evaluation of Human Resources; and Task 10, Evaluation of Technical Services as high priority items. Executive Subcommittee Recommendation Following considerable discussion, at this time the Executive Subcommittee recommends that Addendum No. 2 to the professional services agreement with Ernst &Young to conduct a two-phase, independent review of the Districts' Capital Projects Management Function, be approved to add Phase 3, Task 4, Evaluation of Human Resources, for a total amount not to exceed $60,000, increasing the total compensation authorized for said professional services agreement from an amount not to exceed $235,000 to an amount not to exceed $295,000. FORMATION OF PLANT AUTOMATION GROUP. Enclosed is a copy of a revised staff report (tan) on the proposed Transition Plan to Implement a Plant Automation Group that was considered by the Special Selection Committee Re Computerization at their meeting on August 17, 1994. Minutes of Executive Subcommittee Meeting Page 4 August 24, 1994 As part of the study project known as Addendum 1 to Job J-31, completed in March 1994, the Districts' engineering consultants, CH2M Hill, reviewed the status of the existing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems, the future systems expansion needs, and the organizational support needed to implement and maintain these systems. This CH2M Hill report has previously been reviewed by the Directors. Section 6 of the CH2M Hill report addresses the organization and skills necessary to implement and maintain the monitoring, control and information systems of the Districts. A copy of this section, which proposes a special process control group, is enclosed (goldenrod). This proposal and recommendation was considered by a special staff interdepartmental task force in preparation for the 1994-95 Personnel Budget Recommendations. After considerable study, debate and discussion, the staff task force and executive management staff concluded that the Information Services Division should be expanded to assume responsibility for the plant automation, monitoring and control computer systems so that responsibility for computer activities is centralized in one Division. The skill sets needed for this growing function need to be integrated and unified for best results. This new"group"will need to be on call 24 hours a day, have a close working relationship with Operations, Maintenance and Engineering, provide software development for process control, and manage or oversee the development and implementation of various outside service contracts. The group would utilize existing staff from other Divisions, as needed, for team projects. Staffs proposal to implement this CH2M Hill recommendation was approved by the Fiscal Policy Committee in May as a part of the budget process, but was put on hold by the Executive Committee, along with the other personnel recommendations, to be considered on a case-by-case basis in the future. The Directors may recall that when the formation of this group was considered by the Fiscal Policy Committee as part of the 1994-95 budget process, the new positions and the transfers were offset by deletions or changes in other Divisions for a net overall decrease of five positions and $113,664. The payroll cost reduction was approved in the 1994-95 budget, but the organizational changes were not. The payroll costs of the recommended group can be funded from the existing payroll budget and unfilled positions with no increase in the adopted 1994-95 budget total. Minutes of Executive Subcommittee Meeting Page 5 August 24, 1994 Staff reported that Ernst&Young, the Directors' consultants for the ongoing evaluation of construction management and organizational issues, had been asked to review the staff report. Ernst &Young thinks such a group is a good idea and is consistent with their recommendations. The Computer Committee also discussed the training and travel and office remodeling costs included in the revised staff report. Upon further review, analysis and explanation, the Committee determined that the proposed training and travel costs were really a part of the one-time implementation costs of the CRISP/32 process control software. Funds for the remodeling costs of existing office space were noted as already being provided in the approved 1994-95 CORF Budget for miscellaneous improvements; thus no action by the Directors was required. These costs should properly be capitalized and have been included on the one-page summary entitled "Computerization of Plant Monitoring and Automation Improvements Budget Summary." (See original summary [lavender] and revised summary [blue] enclosed.) The Computer Committee is recommending that the Classification and Compensation Resolution, as amended, be amended to add three positions (one Systems Engineer [$4,495 -$6,360], one Programmer/Analyst [$3,700 - $5,2351 and one Programmer [3,195 - $4,5251)to the Information Services Division for the formation of the Plant Automation Group, and deleting one position (Engineer [$4,495 - $6,360])from the Engineering Department, Planning & Design Division, at no change in the 1994-95 Salaries and wages budget, subject to a report by Ernst & Young and the Executive Subcommittee. The Computer Committee asked that the proposed formation of a Plant Automation Group be included in the Executive Subcommittee agenda for discussion at their scheduled meeting for Wednesday, August 24, 1994. Executive Subcommittee Action Committee members, Ernst &Young representatives and staff discussed the proposal. Although Ernst &Young supports the Plant Automation Group concept, and it is consistent with the direction of their overall recommendations, they cannot offer an unqualified opinion without a detailed study of the proposed new group, which they have not been engaged to do. Ernst&Young estimated that such a review could be done in two to three weeks at a cost of about $30,000. Minutes of Executive Subcommittee Meeting Page 6 August 24, 1994 The Executive Subcommittee, therefore, authorized staff to issue a purchase order to Ernst &Young in an amount not to exceed $26,000, to conduct a study and submit a recommendation on the proposed Formation of the Plant Automation Group. Ernst & Young indicated that they believed the work could be completed in time for the scheduled consideration of the matter by the Joint Boards at their meeting on September 14, 1994. Director Gullixson opposed the action. ADJOURNMENT. The Executive Subcommittee meeting was adjourned at approximately 7:45 p.m. JWS:lC J1WPDOC MVMCU84WESM Enclosures i Capital Project Management Focused Improvement Project Project Objectives, Work Plan, Work Products, and Schedule Task 1: Start-Up and Communication Task Objectives: ■ To select Process Improvement Team(PM ■ To establish goals and objectives for the study ■ To verify the project's scope and any special constraints ■ To understand any other complementary/competing initiatives and previous studies performed ■ To develop at.employee communication plan ■ To orally report our progress to the Board and Management on a periodic basis ■ To supervise and administer the project. Sub-Tasks: 1.1 Identify, interview and select PIT members. 1.2 Discuss objectives and scope for the study with management and Prr. Discuss/review previous studies and existing documentation with management and PIT. Develop PIT's objectives,guidelines and expectations. 1.3 Conduct initial orientation and planning meeting with Prr including a description of the Focused Improvement methodology and approach. Review Phase I results with PIT. 1.4 Refine work plan. 1.5 Develop employee communication plan with the PIT. 1.6 supervise and administer the project. t AMERNST&YOUNGLLP 0 v A Preview of the Process Key Work Products: ■ Updated Work Plan ■ Objectives, guidelines and expectations ■ Employee communication plan Schedule: Week 1 Task 2: Process Documentation and Measures Identification Task Objectives: ■ To create an initial process model ■ To document these processes to the activity level ■ To develop an understanding of the current resource allocation across processes ■ To identify process performance measures Sub-Tasks: 2.1 Review existing organization and understand activities performed by staff 2.2 Develop high level process model of Capital Project Management function 2.3 Conduct process walk-throughs, identify key outputs and flowchart processes 2.4 Identify FTEs currently allocated to each process 2.5 Create the Process/Resource Matrix summarizing resources by process. 2.6 Validate process documentation 2.7 Consider contacting design engineers and contractors to understand their processes Key Work Products: ■ Process/Resource Matrix ■ Process flowcharts of key processes with resource allocation 2 Et ERNST&YOUNGLLP A Preview of the Process Schedule: Weeks I - 3 Task 3: Process Requirements Task Objectives: ■ To identify process requirements and significant customer concerns/requests ■ To identify management and project manager requirements ■ To identify needs of consultants and contractors ■ To compare organizational performance to process requirements Sub-Tasks: 3.1 Gather Customer requirements 3.2 Map organizational performance to process requirements to identify disposition 3.3 Identify the most recent management and project management guidelines and requirements Key Work Products: ■ Customer satisfaction/organization performance matrix Schedule: Weeks 2 - 3 Task 4: Analysis of Process Performance Task Objectives: ■ To comparc activities to process requirements ■ To identify and group root causes Sub-Tasks: 4.1 Classify each activity as supporting (value) or not supporting (non-value) process requirements and summarize the results J ERNST&YOUNG LLP 3 A Preview of the Process 4.2 Identify and group root causes for non-value activities, analyze their impact. Key Work Products: ■ Process flowcharts with value/non-value and root cause designation. Schedule: Week 3 Task 5: Improvement Development Task Objectives: ■ To identify and develop the actions which would be required for improving selected processes ■ To cross-check actions against identified root causes ■ To categorize actions by implementation time-frame and degree of difficulty ■ To estimate impact of actions on process effectiveness, efficiency and adaptability. ■ To prioritize improvement actions. Sub-Tasks: 5.1 Review non-value activities and propose improvement actions to eliminate/reduce root causes. 5.2 Review value activities and propose improvement actions to optimize them. 5.3 Review processes for innovative or"big picture"improvements. 5.4 Categorize and prioritize actions. 5.5 Prioritize improvement action portfolio 5.6 Document proposed process flows. 5.7 Estimate costs to implement improvement actions and high-level benefits to targeted processes. 5.8 Identify resource availability and accountability issues. 4 JERNST&YOUNGLLP A Preview of the Process Key Work Products: ■ Proposed process flowcharts ■ Improvement portfolio with actions grouped by category ■ Cost/benefit analysis for high priority actions. ■ Prioritized Action Portfolio. Schedule: Weeks 3 -5 Task 6: Resource Redeployment Task Objectives: ■ To identify the impact of improvements on human resource requirements and organizational design ■ To discuss enhanced performance measures. Sub-Tasks: 6.1 Document impacts of improvement actions on resource requirements and organizational design. 6.2 Discuss revised performance measures. Key Work Products: ■ Resource redeployment plan Schedule: Week 5 Task 7: Action Plan Development Task Objectives: ■ To develop action plan sequences, schedules, and high-level work plans ■ To obtain executive commitment to resource allocation and responsibility assignments. 5 Elf ERNST&YOUNG LLP A A Preview of the Process Sub-Tasks: 7.1 Obtain Board and Management approval of improvement actions to be implemented. 7.2 Develop high-level work plan and target implementation dates. 7.3 Finalize assignment/commitment of resources and responsibility for each action. 7.4 Compile final report and submit for approval. Key Work Products: ■ Action plans ■ Final report summarizing the process analysis and improved processes resulting from the project. Schedule: Weeks 5-6 6 JERNST&YOUNGLLP I I I � I I • I I Start-Up praess PrMu Praess Improveaenr Resourm Action Pim and(olmrmaimlioe DommeMation Requcem , Performance Derelopmeat A6gameot Develo mear Week 1 Session I ■ Introduction d Goals and Objectives Scope of Project N Expectations ti Introduction to Focused Improvement N Employee Communication Plan Session 2 ■ Business Process Models d Define Major CPM Process Ni Define Current Staffing Identify Key Inputs Outputs and Participants Products ■ Work Plan ■ Project Objective, Guidelines, Expectations • Process/Resource Matrix ® Draft Business Process Flow Charts J ERNST&YOUNG L L P r r r r Sffhu Rowss Rama prmss Impov�f e w A[lio�Plan Commo kalioe Dowmonfallon R Iwmenfs Perlormenw Derelo el meel Develo moel Week 2 Session 3 ■ Review of Business Process Models ti Process Wallcthrough J Review Existing Process Measures Session 4 ■ Process Requirements v Review Existing Policies & Procedures v Identify Process Customers � Compare Organization Performance to Requirements Products ■ Finalized Business Process Flow Charts (Current State) ■ Customer Satisfaction/Organization Performance Matrix ® Process Requirements Priority Matrix JERNST&YOUNG LLP Stmf-� Romrs � Borers Borers Impo�nms Re�oe AMa�Plan Commwimtlon Dommeasafion R aemonss Perlmmmxe Derab mans AD nreni Dereb mans Week 3 Session 5 i Process Analysis Compare Activities to Process Requirements Identify Non-Value Activities Session 6 ■ Process Analysis i Root Cause Analysis Products ® Flow Charts with Value/Non-value Designation ■ Root Cause Analysis J ERNST&YOUNG LLP Stmh Roars Roars Praress Improvt Rare Action Pin Camnmeimtion Dommemotiee Regvveeuoit Per/orrmmre Developownt AG mmt Develu meet Week 4 Session 7 ■ Improvements Development Identify Process Improvement Ideas — Develop Process Improvement Actions — Discuss Process Innovations — Discuss Constraints to Improvement Session 8 ® Improvement Development v Prioritize Process Improvement Actions N Future State Process Models d Cost/Benefit Analysis Products W Draft Improvement portfolio 10 Cost/Benefit Analysis J ERNS T&YOUNG L L P I I t 1 t 1 SIVF� %amss %Dress Aacet+ I�roremoaf Resmrm /ltfion Pbn CIammaalmfm Demmeefmlon Regra is Perbrmaare Devebpmeaf 'Up. et Derelapmeat Week 5 Session 9 i Improvement Development Develop Future State Process Models Discuss New Performance Measures Session 10 ■ Improvements Development Finalize Improvement Portfolio Assign Action Plan Responsibility Products M Final Improvement Portfolio III Cost/Benefit Analyses ■ Proposed Process Flow Charts J ERNST&YOUNG LLP %ores, %users %Dress I evement Reremm Arbon Plan Commonfmtbn Doamonlafion Requnemanfr Perbrmonse Developmem ADgnmanf Development Week 6 Session 11 ■ Resource Redeployment 4 Review Improvement Ideas V Review Staffing Requirements v Review Training Needs Session 12 ■ Action Plan q Review Prioritized Actions v' Group Improvement Actions into Work Plans v' Develop Action Plans Products ® Resource Deployment Plan ■ Action Plans ■ Final Report Eli ERNST&YOUNG LLP County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Phase 11 Work Plan WEEK 1 (8/15) WEEK 2 (8/22) WEEK 3 (8/29) Task IMITIWITIF MIT W T F M T I W T F Review of Policies&Procedures _ Value Engineering Policies&Procedure Pre-Qualification of Consultants Re-Negotiation of Scope& Fees Progress Payment Support _ Low Bid Interpretation Public Works Projects Designation Review of Current Staffing Levels Partnering c a a a ;'. c v Automated Project Management o o o o r;'. o o:. Change Order Management — — •— Size& Composition of Inspection Group — Small Projects Group Contract Administrators Involvement in Project Planning Financial Evaluation of Projects Engineering Proposal Review - A �'•;;Y s.. On-Going Use of Engineers Project Management Teams Field and Status Reports Inspection Logs and Reports Project Close-Out Process _ New Project Tracking System Page t County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Phase II Work Plan WEEK 4 (9/5) WEEK 5 (9/12) WEEK 6(9/19) Task M T W T F M T W T F M T W T F Review of Policies& Procedures Value Engineering Policies& Procedure ` Pre-Qualification of Consultants Re-Negotiation of Scope& Fees Progress Payment Support Low Bid Interpretation Public Works Projects Designation n M rn Review of Current Staffing Levels - + Partnering a n A Automated Project Management o o o o Change Order Management Size& Composition of Inspection Group N . Small Projects Group . d '' h Contract Administrators N v Involvement in Project Planning — Financial Evaluation of Projects Engineering Proposal Review On-Going Use of Engineers Project Management Teams Field and Status Reports Inspection Logs and Reports Project Close-Out Process — New Project Tracking System Page 2 Management Review of the Proposed Plant Automation Group Objective: To develop recommendations on the proposed group's charter, reporting relationships, size, and composition. Approach: Working with Gordon Culp, P.E. of Smith Culp Consulting, Ernst and Young's Information Technology group will take the lead on this project. We will review the recommendations of C112M Hill and staff regarding the group in conducting our management audit. Our focus will be on the following key issues: Charter roles and responsibilities within the group • work of group versus other departments what skills currently exist within the other departments relationship to the 2020 Vision Master Plan relationship to the current high-level systems plan relationship to the current teaming initiatives at the Districts. Reporting Relationships • relationship of group with other departments (matrix management) • authority to prioritize work of the group • supervision of the group • drivers of group activities (operating departments, finance, etc.). Size and Composition • Board/management philosophy/methodology regarding project/contract management and contracting out • projected workplan for the next 3-5 years • nature of the flow of work (smooth, cyclical, etc.) • how to staff for 24 hour presence (and why) • how to provide adequate training and measurement • use of custom versus package solutions. Estimated Fees and Expenses: $30,000 Schedule: 2 weeks County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Proposed Timing of Phase III Projects August 24,1994 1994 1995 Description of Project Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Projects Related to Operating Departments Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance Follow-Up to O&M Work Streamline the Work Request Process Evaluation of Technical Services •:• - Adminfshation/Executive Management Projects Evaluation of Board Processes and Organization Evaluation of Human Resources ^ Evaluation of Finance Organisation and Function ',. 1- Development of a Strategic Information Systems Plan Evaluation of Districts'Legal Counsel Role Organizational Support Projects Analyze Contracting Out Feasibility Team-Building and Communication Focus ..,�„• '•"' County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Tentative In-Town Schedule for Gordon Culp Phases II and M August 24, 1994 I Week of August 29 Phase II Team Phase II and III Week of September 5 Phase II Team Week of September 12 Phase II Team Week of September 19 Phase 11 Team Phase II and III Phase 11 and III Phase II and III Week of September 26 Week of October 3 Phase III Report ERNST&YOUNG •0,. ,�.QM1m1, 011— • 11h, , ru 2 2100 Smlr 1100 F7 -14 152 2374 I8400 %'— K—,— i,.+un, 714 1;2 2442 Imme CILiomid 9_-19 July 25, 1994 John C. Cox,Jr. Joint Chairman County Sanitation District of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Mr. Cox: As you know, Phases I and II of our current work for the Districts are focused on capital project management. This letter identifies broader operational and organizational issues which we believe warrant further analysis based on the information we obtained during Phase I. For your convenience, we will refer to these issues as potential Phase III projects. The objective of this letter is to introduce the potential content of Phase III by briefly describing the focus and related work effort that would be involved. We have prioritized the issues based on our current understanding of the Districts' needs. It is important that your Board understand that the Phase III projects could spread over a six to twelve month period with some of the work performed concurrently with Phase H. The following enclosure to this letter presents ten projects in order of priority. For each project, we briefly describe the objective, general approach, estimated magnitude of costs and schedule. We will develop more detailed work plans and refined budgets after receiving direction from your Board about how we should proceed. We believe the identified projects could substantially benefit the Districts. We also believe that rapid attention to the first three areas is particularly important. We would welcome the opportunity to discuss this work and its significance to the Districts at your earliest convenience. Please call Larry Seigel at (714)252-2402 to set a time to meet. Very Atruly yours, J"" _V Enclosure Page I of 5 Proposed Phase III Projects County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 1. Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance Objective: Develop recommendations to improve staffing, organization, procedures and resource allocation for the Districts'Operations and Maintenance function. Approach: Gordon Culp, P.E. of Smith Culp Consulting will lead this project. He will utilize an extensive, computerized data base on operation and maintenance requirements of wastewater treatment plants developed under a multi-year contract to the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency. During this contract, his frrm collected operation and maintenance data from hundreds of wastewater treatment plants. Mr. Culp and Ernst & Young consultants will interview key operations and maintenance personnel to determine: • operation and maintenance organizational structure • staffing used and individual duties • operational procedures • preventive maintenance procedures and system budgets • actual costs The plant facilities will be toured, and plant operational records including the monthly discharge permit report and plant operation and maintenance manuals will be reviewed. We will also discuss the current relevancy of the 2020 Plan to Operations' perceived needs. Estimated Fees and Expenses: $45,000 Schedule: Six Weeks 2. Evaluation of Board Processes and Organization Objective: To review the composition, organization and processes performed by the Board to determine how effective the Board is in managing the Districts mission. Approach: Ernst & Young will lead this effort with assistance from Mr. Culp. We would interview key members of the board to understand the general processes performed by the Board and its organizational structure including committees and the work they perform. We would also interview the Districts' management to understand how the Board is interacted with, how decisions are made with the Board and how issues or Board RERNSf&YOUNG Enclosure Page 2 of 5 concerns are addressed. We would anticipate that a facilitated session would be held to discuss communication and decision making processes with Board members and Districts management. In addition, we would benchmark several other organizations to understand how the Boards are organized, how they make decisions and how they interact with management. A key focus will be on the structure, composition, role and charter for a revised Board committee organization. Estimated Fees and Expenses: $40,000 Schedule: Five Weeks 3. Team-building and Communication Focus Objective: To move the Districts through a structured process of working together as team and communicated more effectively. Approach: Ernst & Young would lead this effort using our Organizational Change Management methodology to develop a program to facilitate team-building and communication. Our consultants would work with the Board and staff to identify the implementation obstacles, communications needs and conduct team building sessions to improve the effectiveness of recommended operational and organizational changes. Estimated Fees and Expenses: $50,000-$75,000 Schedule: Six to twelve months (i.e. throughout Phase III). 4. Evaluation of Human Resources Objective: To understand and evaluate the current role and effectiveness of the human resources function at the Districts. Approach: We would identify and document the current processes that Human Resources performs. We would understand what systems they use and how people are organized. We would interview Board members and management to understand Human Resources current role and areas that they could provide additional value to the Districts. Key attention areas would be recruitment, selection, evaluation and retention of personnel. We would also focus on HR's role in emerging issues such as risk management, benefits administration and equal employment opportunity. Estimated Fees and Expenses: $60,000 Schedule: Eight to ten weeks. MEeivsr&Youvc Enclosure Page 3 of 5 5. Evaluation of Finance Organization and Function Objective: To understand and evaluate the current role and effectiveness of the finance function at the Districts to develop specific recommendations for improvement. Approach: Ernst & Young would identify and document the current processes that Finance performs. Emphasis would be placed on Finance's role in supporting the operational and administrative needs of the District including internal controls, treasury, cost accounting and financial management functions. We would understand what systems they use and how people are organized and utilized. We would interview Board members and management to understand Finance's current role and areas that they could provide additional value to the Districts. Estimated Fees and Expenses: $60,000 Schedule: Eight to ten weeks. 6. Development of a Strategic Information Systems Plan Objective: To develop a ten-year plan that identifies the administrative and plant operations systems needed to support the strategic direction of the Districts. This document would identify an architecture strategic, needed functionality of software, high- level cost estimates, and mandatory interfaces. Approach: Ernst & Young would lead this effort with technical assistance in the plant automation area. We would work with key management, the Board and end-users to determine the information and delivery systems needed to achieve the Districts mission and Vision 2020. Existing work such as the CH2M Hill analyses would be incorporated to avoid duplication of effort. Estimated Fees and Expenses: $80,000 Schedule: Three months. 7. Analyze Contracting Out Feasibility Objective: To identify areas for contracting out, review costs/benefits and provide viable alternatives based on the Districts mission. Approach: Ernst & Young would lead this effort with technical assistance from Gordon Culp to identify functional areas and processes that could be contracted out. Analysis and research would be performed to determine the economic viability as well as strategic issues. We would survey the scope and nature of contracting at other wastewater MERWMYOUNG Enclosure Page 4 of 5 agencies to consider the reported advantages/disadvantages and then relate the findings to CSDOC to consider high potential opportunities. If analysis showed contracting should be explored, we could assist the Districts in developing and reviewing responses to RFP(s). Estimated Fees and Expenses: $30,0004100,000(depending on scope) Schedule: Four to twenty weeks. 8. Streamline the Work Request Process Objective: To improve the effectiveness and economics of the work request process. Approach: Currently, the Districts process about 70,000 work orders a year. This appears to be a cumbersome and costly process. Ernst & Young would lead a multi- functional, process improvement team to document the current work request process. We would work with the team to identify duplication, rework, non-standardization and other non-value work and streamline the process. At the conclusion of the project, we would develop an implementation plan and procedures to communicate and train individuals in the streamlined process. Estimated Fees and Expenses: $70,000 Schedule: Three months. 9. Evaluation of Districts' Legal Counsel Role Objective: To review how legal counsel is used by the Districts, at what cost and what alternative options might exist. Approach: Ernst & Young would lead this effort. We would interview the Districts' management, appropriate Board members and current legal counsel to understand how and when legal counsel is used and what role he plays in the Districts' day-to-day activities. We would also compare roles, cost and responsibilities of counsel at other districts. We would review the amount of resources used for legal services and identify and explore other options the Districts considers, including in-house counsel, alternative scopes of service and retainer relationships. Estimated Fees and Expenses: $30,000 Schedule: Five weeks. IMAST&Youwc Enclosure Page 5 of 5 10. Evaluation of Technical Services Objective: To understand and evaluate the current organization and effectiveness of Technical Services to develop specific recommendations for improvement. Approach: Ernst & Young would lead this effort with assistance from Mr. Culp. We would work closely with a team of representatives from Technical Services to examine such issues as: • variations in staff level across the five Technical Services groups • scope of activities performed by Technical Services and adequacy of current resources • effectiveness of LIMS • alternative approaches to contracting out, bringing in-house, or better marketing critical functions such as the lab and ocean monitoring. Project activities would include identifying major processes, determining the number and type current staff, developing and prioritizing improvement ideas; and drafting implementation plans with resource requirements, work plans, and costs and benefits. In addition, the Technical Services team will work with members of the other divisions to determine the proper role of Technical Services in such cross-functional processes as job planning and capital project management. Estimated Fees and Expenses: $60,000 Schedule: Eight to ten weeks. MEIMIST&YOUNG COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA August 18, 1994 (Revised) ,o9.A AVENUE 9 Ro SON ox e+zT August 12, 1994 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 n+41992-2411 STAFFREPORT TRANSITION PLAN TO IMPLEMENT PLANT AUTOMATION GROUP BACKGROUND After considerable study, debate and discussion, and supported by a consulting engineering firm's (CH2M Hill) recommendations and an inter-departmental task force recommendation, executive management staff recommended to the Fiscal Policy Committee (FPC) that the Information Services Division should be expanded to assume responsibility for the plant automation, monitoring and computer control systems so that all computer activities are centralized in one Division. The skill sets needed for this growing function need to be integrated and unified for best results. This new group will need to be on-call 24 hours a day, have a close working relationship with Operations, Maintenance and Engineering, provide software development for process control, and manage or oversee the development and implementation of various outside service contracts. During their 1994-95 budget deliberations, the FPC approved this recommendation as part of the total personnel changes deleting 5 positions overall and reducing the payroll by $113,664. At the May 25, 1994 joint meeting of the Executive and Fiscal Policy Committees, the decision was made to hold all 1994-95 personnel recommendations in abeyance, rather than to include such changes in the budget process. Detailed recommendations for any future personnel changes deemed urgent enough to precede the management study being conducted by Ernst & Young would be considered on a case-by-case basis by the Executive Committee. The work awaiting this proposed Plant Automation Group is considered to be of sufficient urgency to warrant consideration, and this report will provide the details of how this group will be implemented. PROPOSED PERSONNEL AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES Attachment 1 summarizes the current organization chart for the Information Services Division. This chart illustrates functional groups and reporting relationships. Attachment 2 expands the organizational view to six pages to show the detailed proposed changes to the Division with the addition of the proposed Plant Automation Group. A detailed discussion of the proposed positions follows: 1 August 18, 1994 (Revised) August 12, 1994 PROPOSED POSITIONS One new Systems Engineer ($4,495 - 6,360) position is proposed as the first of three needed by 1995-96. This first Systems Engineer will supervise the following positions in addition to the normal duties to develop logic and flow diagrams, prepare scopes of work, evaluate and review specifications, and assist in the development of software and hardware training. This position will require certification as a Professional Engineer. This individual must maintain a close working relationship with Operations, Maintenance and Engineering. This position and budget will be transferred from an existing Engineer ($4,495 - 6,360) position in Planning and Design. The functions of one new Project Specialist ($4,080 - 5,775) position are proposed (as the first of three positions to be needed by 1995-96) to assist the Systems Engineer and to be responsible for the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) function, including network design and hardware and software selection. This position requires a Grad- 5 Operators' Certification (Operations Supervisor) to insure the intimacy necessary with wastewater treatment. There will be no added cost for this position as it is already filled. This position will be filled by assignment of existing staff by the Director of Operations, at his pleasure. The budget and personnel will remain in Operations and may continue to be classified as an Operations Supervisor. This position will function in a matrix arrangement between Plant Automation Group and Operations. This has worked successfully for the Compliance Division of Technical Services which has a resident Programmer/Analyst who receives day-to-day direction from the Compliance Manager but maintains a formal relationship within the Information Services Division — attending all staff meetings, receiving training opportunities and being part of the normal activities of fellow Programmer/Analysts on staff. The Project Specialist would, in turn, be expected to participate fully in all staff meetings of Operations while working within the Plant Automation Group. Filling the position by assignment will allow the Director of Operations the greatest flexibility in staffing this position to support Plant Automation while at the same time providing a unique opportunity to cross-train senior level Operations Supervisors in automation technology. Three additional Programmer/Analyst ($3,700 - 5,235) positions were proposed in the 1994-95 personnel recommendations to provide programming for various Information Services activities. The one position designated for Plant Automation will provide support for real-time applications, develop graphic screens, and configure software in support of plant automation. The other two positions are to support non-Plant Automation activities — the expanding Ethernet local area network data highway, the proposed financial information system and the rest of the Districts' informational 2 August 18, 1994 (Revised) August 12, 1994 problem solving needs. The Programmer/Analyst position for Plant Automation will require extensive experience in high level programming for real-time applications and especially for CRISP/32 software. Only one position is included in this proposal. One additional Programmer ($3,195 - 4,525) position is required, in addition to a currently vacant position, to provide the interface between this new system and many programmable logic controllers (PLC) in use throughout the two plants, to program the various man-machine interfaces and for other programming duties. One existing Information Services Technician HI ($3,212 - 3,999) position will be filled to provide a Computer Aided Drafting (CAD) specialist who will be needed to help document the design efforts as well as assist in documenting as-built drawings of existing SCADA systems. Funding for all of these positions is already in the 1994-95 budget and the total personnel count will be maintained through vacant positions. The maximum costs for the proposal, assuming the positions were filled for the entire year at the top of the ranges, can be summarized as follows: Position Total Systems Engineer $ 76,320 Project Specialist (Operations Supervisor) 69,300 Programmer/Analyst 62,820 Programmer 54,300 Info Services Tech III 47,988 TOTAL SALARIES 310 728 When originally considered by the FPC, the new positions and the transfers were offset by other changes or deletions resulting in an agency-wide decrease of 5 positions and a payroll reduction of $113,664. Only the reduction of $113,664 has been approved by the Joint Boards. No budget change is required for these additional positions. 3 August 18, 1994 (Revised) August 12, 1994 STAFFING PLAN Consultations have begun with the Personnel Office to formulate the detailed Classification Descriptions of the newly proposed positions and title changes, covering topics such as education and certification. Immediately upon joint Board's approval of the plan proposed in this report, Personnel Office will begin to recruit to fill the positions and/or transfer existing personnel now working in other Departments. Future staffing beyond 1994-95 will be defined by the progress of the Plant Automation efforts and as a direct result of needs identified within a forward-moving window of planning. Other changes that can be anticipated for the future at this time is the eventual addition of more System Engineers with more refined areas of expertise and more Programmer/Analysts and PLC Programmers. Exact areas of specialization will be best defined as time and experience proves the need. Any changes will be considered by the Directors during future budget processes. OFFICE SPACE A formal job plan has been submitted and drawings are being completed to provide appropriate working space within the Operations and Maintenance Building so that this group will be in close physical contact to their customer. Space is available on the west end of the second floor of that building which was left unfinished during construction for future use. The job plan provides for the finishing of walls, suspended ceiling, raised flooring, wiring for power, telephone and data and partitions for six offices. Additional space will be used as a test area for testing simulation configurations with a test PLC, computers and plant automation software. Staff's cost estimate to complete this remodeling and furnishing is $266,000 which is included in the approved 1994-95 CORF budget for miscellaneous small improvement projects. COMPUTER SYSTEMS The principal project which will be the immediate focus of the Plant Automation Group is the Expansion of Computer and Control Systems, Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31 . Due to the nature of this project, it is recommended that the responsibility for this project shift and be formally reassigned to the Plant Automation Group of Information Services. A number of computer hardware and software resources have already been acquired by the Engineering Department in direct support of this project. Some computer hardware is included but of particular concern is the computer software. It 4 August 18, 1994 (Revised) August 12, 1994 is recommended that these resources be transferred to the Plant Automation Group of Information Services. Other required resources will be supplied as part of the contract for Job No. J-31-3 for the use of the additional staff planned for the Plant Automation Group. INITIAL TRAINING AND TRAVEL The Training and Travel needs for the Plant Automation Group are shown in Attachment 3 (gray), Summary of Training and Travel needs for 1994-95. These critical, initial costs should be considered as part of the CRISP/32 software implementation and capitalized. They can be funded from the CORF budget. The first four courses listed are the courses required by various staff members to be able to obtain their requisite levels of expertise in the CRISP software. This training must be obtained at the Square D CRISP training facilities in Dublin, Ohio because the training includes heavy "hands-on" involvement utilizing test facilities that enable the trainee to make software modifications and see the results on real physical processes. This type of training is not possible here at the Districts at this time. In the future, the Plant Automation Group plans to build an isolated training system to enable test scenarios to be used without any adverse effect upon real "live" processes. In a similar manner, the training listed for items 5 and 6 must also be received at the manufacturer's facilities. These courses are for the software maintenance for the computer systems used for the Central Generation control computers. Items 7 and 8 are training courses for the Modicon PLCs to enable the Plant Automation PLC Programmers to program these PLCs. The training courses are available in Northern California. The final three courses for 1994-95 are training courses for the DEC operating system used by the central computers used by Plant Automation, the DEC VAX 4700A. These courses will be available locally. The costs indicated for these last three courses are present costs. Some savings may be realized from obtaining the same training from other sources. The total amount required for 1994-95 training and travel for the Plant Automation Group is $90,842.00. The costs shown for 1994-95 reflect the high start-up costs associated with the beginning of a new functional group, new plant-automation software and the training which will be required initially. The training and travel costs are expected to decrease by half for 1995-96. For comparison purposes, the training and travel estimated for 1995-96, which is 5 August 18, 1994 (Revised) August 12, 1994 expected to be reduced to $44,900, is a continuation of the training for the DEC computer software and network management. Most of these courses are local and the number of staff members requiring this training will be fewer than in 1994-95. TRANSITION OF WORKLOAD FROM INSTRUMENTATION MAINTENANCE DIVISION The Instrumentation Maintenance Division has, in addition to maintaining the physical hardware of the Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), provided the programming of the software for these units and what amount of networking that was involved. This division will continue to maintain the physical hardware of the PLCs but the Plant Automation Group will assume the responsibility for the development of software, man-machine interface and documentation standards, as well as the development, maintenance and configuration management of all related software. This transition will occur over a period of time with a number of activities overlapping at times. This will require close coordination and communication between Instrumentation and the Plant Automation Group. This transition period is illustrated in Attachment 4. TRANSITION OF WORKLOAD FROM ENGINEERING PLANNING & DESIGN DIVISION The Planning & Design Division of the Engineering Department has the responsibility of planning and designing the physical facilities and processes at the Districts. The Plant Automation Group will establish and maintain standards in relation to the Districts' Plant Automation hardware, software and documentation. These standards, once established, will enable the Planning and Design Division to more effectively plan and design treatment processes and facilities. During the initial transition period, a high degree of cooperation and communication will be required to overcome the problems which have slowly been building over the years. These problems were experienced in the planning and design of systems and facilities which included high technology and resulted from computerization activities not having been previously centralized. While standards are being developed, Plant Automation staff will need to meet with Planning & Design staff constantly to eliminate duplication, discrepancy and other problems that may be discovered for projects which are already in the design process or are in the process of construction. It will necessitate some change orders on existing projects to insure that the resulting facility is in compliance with standards which will be still in development. Eventually, these types of change orders will taper off as new projects are begun with established standards in effect to guide the Planning and Design Division efforts. 6 August 18, 1994 (Revised) August 12, 1994 RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the approval of the Staffing Plan for the new Plant Automation Group for 1 994-95. All of the costs have been included in previously approved 1994-95 Joint Works Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund budgets, and thus there are no budget impacts of their proposal. Total Staffing $310,728 Initial Software Training 90,842 Building Remodelling 266.000 Total $667.570 F.IWPOOCSISNYOERIREPORTSIPAOOOC.SH 7 ATTACHMENT I INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION 2240 ORGANIZATION CHART as of July 19, 1994 (Does NOT reflect salary levels) INFORMATION SERVICESM GER t P9MM SECRETARY 1 Wl�lal SOFMNAME GWHICS SYST PE�CN IS N IN N SPECIALIIIIonT SET ICES CDO�RSOINATOR PRINCIPAL INFORIMTION PROGNAMMER PROGRAMMER SENIORGRAPHICS SERNLES TECHNICMN /ANAYMSF /ANALYST . [ IECHNICMN Sau¢LMSuppat VAY Support tP°ubwl 21 t WY+n 1 WFNon GRAPHICS INFORWTION PROGRAMMER TECHNIC. SERVICESTECHNICLW /ANAYLIST si CpnPlWlul SYpryl IAgR ,... t wlllwcea) PROGRAMMER PROGRAMMER G supW INFOR-TION 2�1SynF 1 FPFNan SERVILEG TECHNIC" II 2p .. INFORMATION SERVICES TECHNICMN I t.AMnxzeel Pace I ATTACMENT 2 INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION 2240 ORGANIZATION CHART PROPOSED FOR 1994-95 (Does NOT reflect salary levels) INFORMATION SERVICES MANAGER 1 Pmngn SECRETARY I povaron SYSTEMS I.Np IINEER SPECIALIST SPE ICE 'NSf�LINLPESN COO N OR PLANT HARDWARE SOFTWARE VAX GRAPHICS AUTOMATION /TELECOM SUPPORT SUPPORT SERVICES GROUP SUPPORT GROUP GROUP GROUP GROUP Page l ATTACHMENT 2 PLANT AUTOMATION GROUP SYSTEMS ENGINEER t Pnsmon Inrx PROJECT SPECULIST t pow In I PROGMMMER /ANALYST CRISP:paaEbl t pe Ilion mewl PR-' PL C' 2 m2 It newt u.m) EW"OR-T.1014 IN C , CNIAN .t m q) Page 2 ATTACHMENT 2 HARDWARE/TELECOM GROUP INFORMATION SERVICES SPECIALIST PRINCIPAL WFOORMATION SERVICES TECHNICIAN 1 pp SENIOR INFOR"A ON SERVICESTECHNIOWI (nmew =a ) INFORMATION SERVICESTECHNIC. III 3 positrons INFORMATION SERVICES TECHNICIAN II ppaaimi INFORMATION SERVICES TECHNICIAN I hmaamnonzeal Page 3 ATTACHMENT 2 SOFTWARE SUPPORT GROUP SOFTWARE SPECIALIST 1 poalllm PRIX -ER /ANALYST Sauce Cm Support 2 paaams PROGRAMMER /ANALYST Campliw"Support t p vt. PROGRAMMER /ANALYST FIS 5., p t posNon PROGRAMMER 1 p Yim Page 4 ATTACHMENT 2 VAX SUPPORT GROUP INFORWrON SERMCES ANALYST 1 ppeMn PROGRAMMER /ANALYST vms pWA t pp nwn PROGRAMMER ANA YST Netwnk Suppal 1 posAon PROGRAMMER Genenl5vppwt f poanwA Page 5 ATTACHMENT 3 GRAPHICS SERVICES GROUP GRn PHICS COORONNTOR 1 po h1N1 SENIOR GWHICS TECHNICM 1,o GWKICS TECHNICM Inure cuTpheE) Page 6 JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES TRAVEL AND TRAINING SUMMARY SHEET DEPARTMENT Finance FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 DIVISION Information Services NO. 2240 PAGE 1 OF 1 NO. OF ESTIMATED UNIT COST ITEM NO. OF EXTENDED JUSTIFICATION FOR NO. TIMES STAFF DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY COST ACTIVITY •• OCCUR. TRAVEL PER DIEM LODGING FEES- TOTAL 1 1 5 Laval I CRISPI32 Training $450 $400 $1,200 $2,500 $4,660 $22,750 All PA Staff 2 1 2 Level 2 CRISP/32 Training $450 $200 $600 81,500 $2,750 $5,500 CRISP Prog, Sys Engr 3 1 2 Level 3 CRISP/32 Training $450 $200 $600 $1,500 $2,750 $5,500 CRISP Prog,Sys Engr 4 1 3 CRISP MMI Training $450 $100 $480 $1,300 $2.390 $7,170 CRISP Rog,2 PLC Prop 5 1 1 1 3 FT100 COOS Training $375 $160 $400 $1,200 $2,215 $6,646 1 2 PLC Prog, + TBD 6 1 3 FT210 COOS Training $376 $200 $600 $2,400 $3,575 010,725 2 PLC Prog. + TOD 7 2 3 Modicon ModBus Plus $178 $160 $480 $900 $1,718 $10.308 2 PLC Prag, + TBD 8 1 3 Modicon Ladder Logic Advanc $178 $160 $480 $900 $1.718 05,164 2 PLC Prog. + TBD 9 1 5 OpenVMS Level 1 $0 $10 $0 $1,800 $1,810 $9,060 All PA Staff except Aide 10 1 2 OpenVMS Leval 2 $0 $10 60 $2,000 12,010 $4,020 CRISP Prog. I PLC Prog 11 1 2 1 OpenVMS Level 3 00 $10 $0 $2,000 $2,010 $4,020 CRISP Prog, 1 PLC Prop TOTAL EXTENDED COST $90,842.00 REQUESTED BY: DATE: APPROVED BY: DATE: DEPARTMENT HEAD APPROVED BY: DATE: GENERAL MANAGER y • Including registration, tuition, meeting room fees, consultant costs, and other support costs. m •• Add attachment for activities totalling more than $ CSDOC PLANT AUTOMATION PLAN 1994-96 1984 1995 M , PN/.L AUG I SEPT I OCT I NOV I DEC I JAN I FEB I MAR I APR I MAY I JUN I JUL I AUG I SEPT I IAKCO;n" I HIRING REVISION OF MASTER PLAN CRISP LEVEL 1 TRAINING CRISP LEVEL 2&3 TRAINING, ADVANCED TRAINING i oADDM 3 STANDARDS OTAKE OVER J28 SUPPORT P&S' , BID NTP' J31-1 FIBER OPTIC BACKBONE VAX CONFIG PLANT 1 CONFIG A-B ON CRISP � PLANT 1 n s CONFIG MODICONS PLANT 1 TAKE OVER SOFTWARE CBOS TRAINING SUPPORT INTERGRATE TAKE OVER ? i BOTH CO-GENS o CBOSSUPPORT P&S' BID NTP' IMFS'1 &2 COBS CITY& PLANT WATER � i , __ __i o TAKEOVER PROCURE, VAX CONFIG PLANT 2 OOB SUPPORT CONFIG A-B ON CRISP PLANT 2 P& S' =Plans and Specs CONFIG MIDICONS PLANT 2 NTP' = Notice to Proceed i P&S' , BID _NTP' SECONDARY TREATMENT IMFS' = Influent Metering Flow System P&S , BID NTP , HEADWORKS caooc>iw Section 6 System Support Overview of Section This section addresses control system support, that is the organization and skills necessary to implement and maintain the monitoring, control, and information systems of the Districts. Recently, the Districts formed a Process Control Task Force to discuss this topic. The District Task Force identified several critical issues during their meetings, including the following: • There are various Districts staff in several different departments who have some common areas of expertise which address some of the needed skills to support the Districts' control systems; however, there is no single Districts group with the charter to bring all of the necessary skills together for work that is to be performed. • The exact name of the tasks to be performed and the required background, education, training, and the placement of this staff within the Districts' organization. • The necessary skill sets need to be integrated and unified. A fundamental component of system support success are the key capabilities that this group must possess. In summary, these key capabilities include the following: • Group Management, including interdepartment procedures, technical resource management, planning, and personnel administrative management • Operations Interface, including day-today support, training, and long- term system planning to meet operations needs • Engineering Capability, including design support, system planning, process control strategy development, control software development, and construction coordination • Maintenance Responsibility, including software maintenance, hardware maintenance, and documentation The actual group organizational structure, composition, and placement in the Districts' organization are issues that need to be addressed by the Districts. scoiootssazwrs 6-1 Process Control Group This group has the responsibility and mission to provide support for the process control systems. This includes but is not limited to real-time systems. The type of services provided include real-time operations and maintenance support, business systems support, engineering, planning, construction coordination, and documentation. Philosophy and Mission The responsibility and support mission requires a blend of skills that in many cases cross existing organizational boundaries. It requires a group that contains the appropriate man- agement structure and technical makeup, and a service-oriented mission. This group requires technical skills from various backgrounds because of the wide-ranging responsi- bilities which crossover when meeting needs of other departments. Process control and monitoring systems have traditionally crossed organizational boundaries regardless of the industry or site-specific administrative organization. Following is a list of many of the functions required of a generic process control group nor specific to the Districts. (Note: The following breakdown is by function under the domain of a process control group.) Management • Development of procedures with other administrative groups, such as operations, maintenance, and engineering • Standardization of hardware and software requirements • Establishment and maintenance of service-oriented philosophy • Management that is both technically and administratively skilled Operations • Day-to-day, real-time operations and maintenance support • Operations training of control system functions - Engineering • System design support, including hardware and software • System planning, including hardware and software • Process control strategy development • Process control strategy implementation • Software development • Construction coordination scotnmserz.wes 6-2 Maintenance • Software maintenance • Continuous hardware and software documentation • Hardware maintenance support Technological Skills It is important to have a group that is competent, capable, credible, and experienced in the following technical areas: • Hardware - Instrumentation - PLC (and peripheral devices) - VAX - Workstations • Software - PLC software - VAX - SCADA system - Communication protocols such as Ethernet or ModbusPlus • Operations and Maintenance - Process control theory - Operations theory - Wastewater treatment operations scoiooissrr.wes 6-3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS el ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10944 Ews 4veuus Ad.BOX 0127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAUFOBNN 92726.8127 A141962F411 June 2, 1994 COMPUTERIZATION OF PLANT MONITORING&AUTOMATION IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET SUMMARY PERIOD DESCRIPTION PLANT PLANT2 TOTAL COMPLETED WORK 1990 1. Install HSO Computer Monitoring Systems and fiber optic network. $2.10 M $2.00 M $4.10 M 1994 Presently monflors 15%Plant 1 and 30%Plant 2 1993 2. Job J31 awarded to CH2101-ill,Expansion of Existing Computer $0.19 M $0.01 M $020 M Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2. 1994 3. J31 Addendum No.1,HBO and Control System,Review and $0.03 M $0.02 M $0.05 M Evaluation 'ITOTALCOST'.OF COMPLETEDIWORK' $232M '^$2A33 {x S8!J6 MG FUTURE AUTHORIZED WORK 1994-6 4. Com letion of remaining J31 System Design and Implementation $0.20 M $023 M $0.43 M FUTURE PROPOSED WORK(Preliminary Estimated Costs for Bud etin Purpozez July S. Purchase CRISP Software Site License,both Plants(Per#3) $0.22 M $0.22 M $0."M 1994 6. Purchase Digital Equipment VAX Computer Equip.(Per#3) $0.40 M - $OAO M August 7. J31 Addendum No.3(Currently under evaluation by Staff and not $0.40 M $0.40 M $0.80 M 1994 yet proposed to Boards): a. Develop Integration standards b. Design plan to modernize and renovate existing obsolete and high maintenance Instrumentation C. Automate report generation of Deily,Weekly,Monthly 6 Yearly Reports d. Miscellaneous Plant automation projects including life cycle cost analysis(See IF 10-16) S. Install Additional Fiber Optic Network and Communications Equip $0.70 M $0.70 M $1.40 M Sept 9. Computer System Setup and Factory Test(Re#5&6) $0.05 M - $0.05 M 1994 Ongoing 10. Upgrade and consolidate existing PLC's(Per#7) $1.00 M $0.90 M $1.90 M Work thm 11. Purchase Digital Equipment VAX Computer Equip.(Per IF 2) - $0.30M $0.30M 1996 12. Computer System Setup and Factory Test(Re#11) - $0.06 M $0.06 M 13. Replace Ocean Ouffall Booster Station DCS(Per#2 6 7) - $0.60 M $0.60 M 14. Automate Plant 1 Headworks(Per IF 7) $0.65 M - $0.65 M 15. Integrate digester#5-#10 controls into existing PLC(Per#7) $0.39 M - $0.39 M 16. Replace and modify secondary treatment process existing $0.20 M $1.00 M $120 M instrumentation and control systems(Per#7) 17.15%Contingency Fund $0.63 M $0.66 M $1.29 M TOTALCOSTFOR PROPOSED FUTUREWORK ' '`$4.84 M $5.07:M ,$9,91 Ms GRAND TOTAL COMPLETED AND PROPOSED WORK AT BOTH PLANTSI' ' 574.2fi M: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS sl ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Revised August 17.1994 IM44 ELLIS AVENUE oa.BOX$127 June 2,1994 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 nlal 962.2411 COMPUTERIZATION OF PLANT MONITORING 8 AUTOMATION IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET SUMMARY PERIOD PLANT 1 PLANT 2 TOTAL COMPLETED WORK M=Millions 1990 1. Install HSO Computer Monitoring System and fiber optic network, $2.10 M $2.00 M $4.10 M 1994 Presently monitors 15%Plant 1 and 30%Plant 2 1993 2. Job J31 awarded to CH2N ll,Expansion of Existing Computer $0.19 M $0.01 M $0.20 M Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2. 1994 3. J31 Addendum No.1.HSO and Control System,Review and $0.03 M $0.02 M $0.05 M EValuation TOTAL COST OF COMPLETED WORK $2.32M _$2.03M f6.35M FUTURE AUTHORIZED WORK 1994-6 4. Completion of remaining J31 System Design and Implementation $0.20 M $0.23 M $0.43 M July S. Purchase CRISP Software Site License,bath Plants $0.22 M $0.22 M $0.44 M i P94 6. Purchase Digital Equipment,VAX Computer Equipment 50.40 M $0.40 M FUTURE PROPOSED-WORK(Preliminery,Estimated Casts for Budgeting Purposes) August 7. J31 Addendum No,3 $0,30 M $0.23 M $0.53 M 1994 a. Develop integration standards A. Design plan to modernize and renovate existing obsolete and high maintenance instrumentation c. Miscellaneous Plant automation projects including life cycle cost analysis 8. Install Additional Fiber Optic Network and Communications Equip $0.70 M $0.70 M $1.40 M Sept S. Computer System Setup and Factory Test(Re If 5 8 6) $0.04 M $0.04 M 1994 10. Remodel Once 8 Development Lab.for Plant Automation Group $0.27 M $0.27 M. 1994.5 11. Initial CRISP/32 Training for Staff $0.0M $0.09M Ongoing 12. Upgrade and consolidate PLC's(Per It 7) $0.85 M $0.78 M $1.90 M Work -Integration Services CH2MHill $0.15M $0.12M thru 1996 13. Purchase Digital Equipment VAX Computer Equip.(Per 0 2) $0.24 M $0.24 M 14. Computer System Setup and Factory Test(Re 0 11) $0.04 M $0.04 M 15. Replace Ocean Outfall Booster Station DCS(Per 0287) $0.60M $0.60M 16, Automate Plant 1 Headworks,Design(Per 0 7) $0.45 M $0.95 M -Integration Services CH2MHi11 $0.20 M 17. Integrate digester 9 5.10 conlrOIS Into existing PLC(Per 0 7) $0.39 M 50.39 M 18, Replace and modify secondary treatment process existing $0.20 M SO.70 M 57.20 M Instrumentation and control systems(Per 0 7) $0.W M -Integration Services CH2MHi11 19. 12.5%Contingency Fund $0.63 M $0.66 M S7.29 M TOTAL COST FOR PROPOSED FUTURE WORK $5.09 M $482 M 39.91 M GRAND TOTAL COMPLETED AND PROPOSED WORK AT BOTH PLANTS 314.26 M Ongoing 20. Maximum Staffing(Already Budgeted) 1 $0.31 M 50.31 M s COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS L of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 108414 ELLIS AVENUE A BOXB127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 91me82.2A11 August 19, 1994 MEMORANDUM TO: Executive Committee FROM: John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chair Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chair RE: Proposed Board Committee Restructuring As I reported to the Directors at the August 10th Joint Board Meeting, we have been considering a restructuring of the Board Committees. This is partially an outgrowth of the engineering projects/management practices review being conducted by Ernst & Young. We believe the proposed restructuring provides more focused responsibilities for each Committee, and the opportunity for all Board members to become more knowledgeable and involved in the Districts' Wastewater Management Program. It will also allow for more interaction with other Directors and staff. Following are our recommendations: STANDING COMMITTEES It is proposed that there be four Standing Committees in the Joint Administrative Organization: (1) Operations; (2) Engineering and Construction; (3) Finance and Personnel; and (4) Executive. Operations Committee: (A new committee that combines the former Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee, the Select Committee to Advise the Staff, the Special Selection Committee Re Ocean Monitoring and the Ad Hoc Committee Re Service to Areas Outside the Districts) The proposed regular meeting date is the 1 st Wednesday of each month. With the goal of compliance with all public health and environmental laws and regulations, the Operations Committee shall review and submit appropriate recommendations on matters pertaining to the operation of the Joint Treatment Works, including such matters as current and projected service/flow needs, level and quality of treatment, conservation, recycling and reuse activities and air quality issues. a The Committee shall also review issues pertaining to the Districts' NPDES Ocean Outfall Discharge Permit, including annual review of the contractor(s) performing the ocean monitoring and research programs required as a condition of said permit, and related issues regarding protection of the marine waters off metropolitan Orange County's coastline from impacts as a result of the Districts' operations and discharge of treated wastewater. The Committee shall also review matters pertaining to contractual arrangements by the Districts to provide sewerage services to areas outside the Districts established boundaries or approved spheres of influence. The Committee will project the future needs, explore alternatives and make recommendations on solutions to the Engineering and Construction Committee. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Committee shall regularly study, visit and observe the various operational functions of the Joint Treatment Works. Because of the special interest of the coastal communities in ocean issues, one representative of each member agency within the Districts' boundaries with coastal shoreline shall be a member of the Committee. Engineering & Construction Committee: ( A new committee that combines the former Engineering and Construction Committee, the Building Committee, and the Special Selection Committee Re Computers) The proposed regular meeting date is the 1 st Thursday of each month. The Engineering and Construction Committee shall review and submit appropriate recommendations on matters pertaining to capital projects to address operational needs identified by the Operations Committee, including the selection of professional consulting services to assist in studying, planning and designing needed Joint Treatment Works and support facilities, including computerized systems, in accordance with the Boards' established policies and procedures for procuring such services; and construction projects for said facilities in accordance with applicable public works laws and Board policies. Said oversight shall include the contracts for professional services and public works construction projects and addenda or change orders thereto. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Committee shall receive "heads up" and regular status reports on the projects from staff, and monitor, visit and observe the Joint Treatment Works operational functions and major capital construction projects. Finance & Personnel Committee: (A new committee that combines the former Fiscal Policy and Personnel Committees) The proposed regular meeting date is the 3rd Wednesday of each month. The Finance and Personnel Committee shall review and submit appropriate recommendations on matters pertaining to financial, budgeting, and personnel policies. 2 'L The Finance and Personnel Committee shall review the development, preparation and format of the annual Joint Works budgets. The Committee is responsible to periodically interview and recommend to the Joint Board the selection of outside auditors. The Committee will review the result of the annual audit of the Districts' accounts with representatives of the outside audit firm, including any comments received recommending improvements. The Committee will review management's response to these comments and make appropriate recommendations to the Joint Boards for implementation. Periodically the Committee will employ an outside firm to audit internal control procedures to safeguard the assets of the Joint Districts. The Committee will interview and make recommendations to the Joint Board on the employment of investment-banking firms, bond counsel and, if necessary, financial advisors to be used in connection with the Districts' financing programs. The Committee will periodically coordinate personnel audits of the Joint Districts' operations or segments of the operations on an as-needed basis. The Committee will make recommendations on personnel policies and procedures, labor negotiations, insurers and coverage, procurement procedures, and such other related activities as may be needed and appropriate. Executive Committee: (No change from current Committee makeup) Proposed regular meeting date is the 4th Wednesday of each month. The Executive Committee shall consist of the Chair of the Board of Directors of each individual District, or the Chair pro tern if the Chair is unable to attend, the Directors who represent the Orange County Board of Supervisors, and the Chair and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. Each past Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization shall also serve as a member of the Executive Committee provided that said person serves as an active Director on a District Board. The Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be the Chair of the Executive Committee. The Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be the Vice Chair of the Executive Committee. The Executive Committee shall meet monthly and review the reports and recommendations of the other Standing Committees and consider matters to be placed on the agenda for the following month's Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors. The Executive Committee may also consider other matters referred to it. 3 STEERING COMMITTEE In addition to the Standing Committees, the Joint Chair plans to implement a Steering Committee comprised of the Joint Chair, the Vice Joint Chair and the chairs of the Operations, Engineering and Construction, and Finance and Personnel Standing Committees to assist in coordinating the flow of activities to the committees and Boards. It is proposed that this Committee shall also conduct an annual performance evaluation of the General Manager and submit recommendations on compensation to the Executive Committee and the Joint Boards of Directors. The Committee shall also review the General Manager's evaluation and compensation of senior management direct reports, based on established criteria, and senior management's goals and objectives for the following year. SPECIAUAD HOC COMMITTEES In addition to the Standing Committees, the Boards, the Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization, or the Chair of a Standing Committee, may appoint, from time to time, special or ad hoc committees to study and report on specific matters. Such committees shall be temporary in nature and their assignments shall pertain to a current, specific issue. Upon completion of the assigned task, the ad hoc or special committee will be dissolved. SELECTION OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The Boards currently have in place Policy Resolution No. 90-43, Pertaining to Procedures for the Selection and Procurement of Professional Engineering, Architectural, Environmental, Land Surveying and Construction Management Services. The policy provides that the solicitation and evaluation of proposals, and the recommendation for engagement of a firm to provide such services, by an individual District, shall be by a Selection Committee comprised of the Chair, the Chair pro tem (except on three-member Boards) and one staff member (the Director of Engineering). No change is proposed for the individual District professional services selection process. The Selection Committee for Joint Works is currently the Joint Chair, the Vice Joint Chair, and the Director of Engineering as the staff member. It is proposed that the policy resolution be amended to provide for a change in the Joint Works professional services selection process. The revision would provide that the selection process for Joint Works professional services procurement would be conducted by the Standing Committee responsible for the work under consideration. For example, the solicitation 4 and evaluation of proposals, and recommendation for selection of a consultant to design a new Joint Works treatment facility, would be conducted by the Engineering and Construction Committee; whereas, for a consultant to perform the ocean monitoring work it would be the Operations Committee. GENERAL COMMITTEE GUIDELINES Size. Membership and Appointments: Each Committee shall have a Chair and a Vice Chair. With the exception of the Executive Committee and the individual Districts' Selection Committees, the Chair, Vice Chair and members of each committee shall be appointed by the Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. With the exception of the Executive Committee and the Steering Committee, the makeup and size of each Committee shall be determined by the Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization. To the extent practicable, committee appointments shall represent a broad and equitable distribution of members among Districts and member agencies, and consideration of relevant expertise that a member can bring to the Committee. It is also desirable to have a mix of senior Directors and new Directors on each Committee, and to rotate newer Directors through the various committees. Meeting Time and Place: Each Committee shall fix a regular monthly meeting time and place or may meet at the call of its Chairman. Because of the regular meeting days of member agencies, the available days for Districts' Board committee meetings is very limited. Therefore, specific days are recommended and included above under the discussion of each committee. REQUIRED BOARD ACTIONS Portions of the current Board committee structure are dictated by Board policy resolutions, others are at the discretion of the Joint Chair. To implement the proposed restructuring, the following actions will be necessary: 1. Amend relevant provisions of Resolution No. 87-51, as amended, the Boards' Policy Resolution Pertaining to Fixing and Establishing Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business of the Districts, by revising the language to incorporate the proposed committee restructuring. 2. Amend relevant provisions of Resolution No. 9043, the Boards' Policy Resolution Pertaining to Procedures for the Selection and Procurement of Professional Engineering, Architectural, Environmental, Land Surveying and Construction Management Services, by revising the language to incorporate the proposed committee restructuring. 5 This amendment should probably be in the form of the addition of a statement to the effect that in the case of Joint Works projects, the Standing Committee with jurisdiction over the work for which the services are to be performed shall serve as the Selection Committee. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE The following implementation schedule is proposed: August 25, 1994: Executive Committee Consideration September 14, 1994: Joint Boards Consideration October 1, 1994: Begin Implementation TENTATIVE COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS Enclosed for Directors is a listing of tentative committee assignments. It is intended that a letter from the Joint Chair will go to all Directors inviting them to indicate their interest in committee assignments, in order of preference, and asking for an updated biography. Upon return and consideration of that information, the assignments will be finalized. 6 8/18/95 DL 124 TENTATIVE COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS ENGINEERING/ YRS OPERATIONS CONSTRUCTION FIN/PERS STEERING EXEC DIRECTOR I SERV DISTRICT I AGENCY 1STWED 1ST THURS 3RD WED AT CALL 4TH WED Barrera 6 12,713.14 Orange x Brown 1 3 Seal Beach x Callen' 10 2,3 Fullerton x x Collins 4 2.3 Fountain VIy x x Cox' 14 5 Newport Bch x x Debay 1 ] Newport Bch x Denes 2 2 Villa Park x Dunlap 3 3 Brea EckenroCe 2 Placentia x Ferryman 1 1 CMSD x Flora 3 3 La Habra x Griffin 17 3 Buena Park x x Gullixson 4 13 Yorba Linda x x Hammond 1 7,14 Imne x Hart' 14 6 Newport Bch x Leipzig 2 11 Huntington Bch Linn 3 La Palma x Lutz 1 3 Santa Ana x Mahoney' 9 2 La Haba x x McGuigan 3 1 Santa Ana x Moreno 1 l Santa Ana x Moulton- x Patterson 3 Huntington Bch ENGINEERING/ YRS OPERATIONS CONSTRUCTION FIN/PERS STEERING EXEC DIRECTOR SERV DISTRICT I AGENCY 1ST WED 1ST THURS 3RD WED AT CALL 47H WED Nelson 12 2 Brea x Parker 3 13 Brea x Partin 10 3 Cypress x Pickle, 6 2,3,13 Anaheim x Potts 14 Tustin x Pulido 3 2 Santa Ana x Rice 3 MCSD x Saltareth 2 7 Tustin x Sansone 5 5 Newport Bch x x Sapien 10 3 Stanton x Singer 2 3 GGSD Stanton 16 1,2,3,11 BdrSupv x x Steiner 1 5.6,7.13.14 Bd/Supv x x Swan' 8 14 IRWO x x x Sylvia 16 3 Los Alamitos x Wanner' 14 6,7 CMSD x x Welch 2 Yorba Linda x Winchell 5 11 Huntington Bch x Worley 1 Tustin x Zlakel 2 2 GGSD x 15 16 15 15 Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency delegate-James A.Wohner(Alternate-None) Interagency AOMP Implementation Committee delegate-John C.Cox,Jr. Regional Advisory Planning Council(RAPC)delegate-Evelyn Had(John C.Cox,Jr.)(Peer Swan-alternate)" National Water Research Institute delegate-Buck Catlin(Alternate-Wayne Sylvester,Margie NelloD Stringfellow Advisory Committee delegate-None Orange County MPO Committee-William Mahoney •' Board Policy for RAPC Is Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. However,past Joint Vice Chairman Had has continued to serve as the active delegate. AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 • 10944 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 927284127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1994 AT 7:30 P.M. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a): AWARD PURCHASE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE. (SPECIFICATION NO. C-034). The Districts have historically used chlorine for trunk sewer odor control, foul air scrubber treatment, plant water disinfection, and process control (to control microbe growth) at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2. Due to the safety of plant staff, contractors and neighbors, emerging air emission issues, rising chlorine chemical costs, increasing maintenance and equipment costs, new chlorine handling capital facility costs, and a potential ban on chlorine chemical use, staff conducted a trial of hydrogen peroxide chemical to determine if it is a viable alternative for chlorine for trunk sewer odor control. The Vial proved that a 50% hydrogen peroxide solution can successfully be used as a substitute for chlorine for sulfide and odor control of the influent wastewater. As a result, the Districts have replaced bulk chlorine use with hydrogen peroxide on a full-scale basis. Major cost savings result from the use of hydrogen peroxide since chlorine costs have increased 78%. The Districts have not yet installed hydrogen peroxide feed equipment, and a capital improvement project to install hydrogen peroxide equipment is under design. Therefore, the suppliers were requested to supply temporary chemical feed equipment. September 14, 1994 ` The temporary chemical feed equipment will be needed for approximately twelve months, at which time the Districts' permanent chemical feed facilities should be constructed. Sealed bids were received from five suppliers, two of which were no bids. The high bid was $2.5213 per gallon and the low bid was $2.252 per gallon, including delivery, temporary chemical feed equipment and environmental taxes, plus sales tax. It is estimated that the Districts will use 450,000 gallons of chemical during the one- year contract. Staff recommends award of a contract to FMC Corporation, the lowest responsible bidder, for the purchase of approximately 450,000 gallons of hydrogen peroxide, including temporary feed equipment, delivery and environmental tax, for the unit price of$2.252 per gallon, for an amount not to exceed $1,013,400.00, plus sales tax, for a one-year period, with provisions for two one-year extensions under mutually agreeable terms. 9(b): AWARD PURCHASE OF PORTABLE GAS DETECTORS (SPECIFICATION NO. E-247). Portable gas detectors are used to test and monitor atmospheres before confined space entry, and for general safety monitoring of potentially hazardous environments in the work place. The 1994-95 safety capital equipment budget includes funding for portable gas detectors with battery chargers, storage cases and connector cables. In an effort to minimize initial expense, maintenance repair costs and long- term operational costs, the Maintenance Department's Instrumentation and Collections Divisions have evaluated several types of portable gas detectors in collaboration with the Health and Safety Division. The gas detector evaluation was based on actual field studies performed by Districts' staff. The detectors were tested under normal working conditions, mainly collection trunkline service, which accounts for about 85% of the use. The findings show that the Gastech Inc., Model GT-302/402 portable gas detectors meet or exceed the performance criteria. The Gastech unit cost is $2,230, Staff also evaluated the Neotronics "Exolox 75 Ambilog" gas detector, and during fresh air testing, the unit exhibits sensor drift, which is electronic in nature and does not adversely affect the usability of this detector, but does cause confusion and concerns of reliability by the users. When this detector is exposed to very high levels of hydrogen sulfide gas (300 plus ppm) with a mixture of hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide, the detector experienced very slow recovery. This condition did not occur with the other detectors. This detector failed to respond properly when subjected to -2- September 14, 1994 pavement surface temperatures, which are considered normal during the summer months, and also failed to provide the required alarm when a pump failure was simulated. The Neotronics unit cost is $2,960. Staff also evaluated the MSA "Passport"detector. This detector performed satisfactorily during testing but exhibited physical limitations that were of some concern. The auxiliary probe and tubing assembly used to test hard-to-reach areas was found to be substandard. The tubing is small and easily blocked. This detector is also very lightweight, making it susceptible to being easily pulled into the subsurface work area, and the pump attachment option is not adequate for normal field conditions. The MSA unit cost is $2,420. Staff therefore recommends the purchase of twenty-six Gastech Model GT- 302 portable gas detectors, the only detector meeting Districts' requirements. J.G. Tucker and Son of Covina is the sole local area distributor for the Gastech detector. Along with the negotiated unit price of$2,230.00, Tucker has offered a trade-in for twenty-two obsolete detectors amounting to $5,800.00. It is recommended award of purchase of Portable Gas Detectors (Specification No. E-247) be made to J.G. Tucker and Sons for the twenty-six detectors for a net total expenditure of$52,180.00, plus applicable sales tax. 9(c): APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 3 RE EXTENSION OF TELEPHONE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT (SPECIFICATION NO. 5-060). The Districts own a complex and advanced telephone system which includes voice mail, automated attendant and digital communication features. The system is located in the Administration Building at Plant No. 1 but serves both plants. For the past two-and-one-half years, the existing PBX equipment has been maintained by the supplier, PacTel Meridian Systems (PTMS). Staff has been studying improvements to our existing PBX system which include the probable installation of an auxiliary PBX system at Plant No. 2. This new auxiliary PBX will be tied into the main PBX at Plant No. 1 and will not require its own attendant console. This new system will increase the reliability of the telephone lines at Plant No. 2, eliminate existing constraints on telephone equipment, increase the availability for expansion, improve the quality of the circuitry, and keep costs down. When staff is prepared to make a recommendation to the Joint Boards for the major system expansion, a maintenance contract will be included in the proposal so that one single vendor will maintain both the new and existing equipment. In light of the plans for expansion in the near future, staff is recommending an extension of the existing maintenance contract to allow time to finalize planning, obtain approval, and acquire the new equipment for Plant No. 2, which will be included in a new maintenance agreement. The contract can be cancelled with a 30-day notice for no penalty. The rate last year was $2,578 per month. Some equipment has been added increasing the monthly maintenance rate for next year to $2,754. -3- September 14, 1994 Staff, therefore, recommends that staff be authorized to issue a purchase order for Amendment No. 3 to the Telephone System Maintenance Agreement with PTMS to extend it for the period August 22, 1994 to August 21, 1995, for an amount not to exceed $33,048.00, or$2,754.00 per month, cancellable with 30-days notice. 9(d): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-53-1, AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE. Job No. P2-53-1, Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, provides structural modifications and additions to Headworks B and C at Treatment Plant No. 2 to minimize damage that would occur to these facilities from a major earthquake. Plant No. 2 is located on the Newport-Inglewood fault. Headworks B was originally constructed in phases from 1963 to 1971 and Headworks C from 1969 to 1974. This $1.4 million project was designed by Dames and Moore from January 19, 1992 to July 19, 1992, and the construction contract was awarded in October 1993 to Amelco Construction. This contract is now complete. This change order involves one item for adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net deduction of$35,000.00 from the original contract amount. (1) Change Order No. 6 Item 1, a credit in the amount of$35,000.00, is an adjustment of engineer's quantities for the deletion of crushed rock. Item No. 3 of the Contract Schedule of Prices allows for payment to the Contractor on a unit price basis for crushed rock if it is necessary to stabilize the bottom of excavations. Stable subgrades were found in all excavations and no crushed rock was required. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 6 for a net deduction of$35,000.00 from the contract with Amelco Construction. There is a no time extension associated with this change order. The original contract amount for this project was $1,377,000.00. The project is now complete. The net amount of change orders to date is $48,575.00, representing a net increase of 3.53% above the original contract amount. (2) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Amelco Construction has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached with the agenda material, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement, and filing the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $1,425,575.00. -4- September 14, 1994 9(e): AUTHORIZING GENERAL COUNSEL TO DEFEND DISTRICTS INTERESTS PERTAINING TO WESTSIDE BUILDING MATERIAL CORP. VS. CSDOC AND JAVAID CONTRACTORS, INC.. RE JOB NO. P2-23-5-1(REBID NO. 2). The Districts were recently served with a Summons and Complaint in the above-referenced lawsuit filed in the West Orange County Superior Court. The action is by a subcontractor to enforce its rights pursuant to a stop notice, alleging that it has not been paid by a subcontractor, Metcalf Lathing, of the general contractor of the Districts on Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2)for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2. The Districts have no fault or responsibility with regards to this action, but since they have been named as a party to the lawsuit, preparation of an answer or other responsive pleading to the complaint is necessary. After that, the Districts will simply await the final outcome of the dispute between the general contractor and the subcontractor, and based upon their agreed settlement or a court judgment, the Districts will then disburse the sums which they are holding. The Districts will be entitled to and in fact will deduct from the sums being held, the full amount of the legal fees and costs incurred by the Districts in handling this matter. The only actions for the Boards are to receive and file the Summons and Complaint and authorize the General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts, as necessary. DISTRICTS 3 AND 11 9 (f): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 11-17-1. This $5,599,000 project, located within the City of Huntington Beach along Slater Avenue, between Goldenwesl Street and Nichols Street, was designed by John Carollo Engineers and provides for the construction of a new 29 million gallons per day (mgd) pumping station, 42-inch vitrified clay pipe (V.C.P.) and 48-inch reinforced concrete pipe (R.C.P.) gravity lines, and a 36-inch ductile iron force main. The existing Slater Avenue Pump Station is currently operating near capacity and will be demolished immediately after the construction of the new pump station, along with the abandonment of existing gravity and force main sewers. Change Order No. 2 adds $20,988.00 and 14 calendar days to the contract for five items of additional work. This job is now 37% complete. Item 1, in the amount of$5,714.00 and 5 calendar days, is for additional potholing required to investigate an alternate alignment for the proposed 48-inch -5- September 14, 1994 R.C.P. gravity line due to a direct conflict with an existing telephone duct bank and the designed alignment between Station Nos. 39+05.00 and 39+30.46. The design drawings, based on information provided by General Telephone and Electronics Corporation (GTEC), did not accurately depict the elevation of GTEC's fifteen conduit duct bank in the Districts' contract drawings. By potholing prior to construction, the telephone duct bank was determined to be approximately four feet lower and therefore in direct conflict with the 48-inch R.C.P. profile. After additional potholing, an agreement with GTEC was executed to realign the cable over the top of the 48-inch designed sewer alignment. This agreement allowed the Districts to avoid a costly realignment of the sewer and associated down time. Item 2, in the amount of$2,245.00 and 4 calendar days, is for a change in traffic control requirements imposed by the city traffic engineer after award of the contract. The Districts were directed to remove four existing five-signal traffic heads at Slater Avenue and Goldenwest Street and replace them with four temporary three- signal traffic heads. After construction is complete at the intersections of Goldenwest Street and Slater Avenue (boring and jacking operations), the temporary three-signal heads must be removed and the five-signal heads must be reinstalled. This work requires purchasing the three-signal heads and rewiring the systems each time the changeover is made. The City of Huntington Beach imposed the change for traffic- safety reasons to allow for protected left turns as opposed to permissive left turns in an intersection with lane closures, and jacking and receiving pits. Item 3, in the amount of$8,624.00 and 4 calendar days, is for the removal of a large concrete collar around a 54-inch storm drain that was in direct conflict with the 42-inch V.C.P. installation. County Flood Control as-built drawings did not disclose the presence of an irregular non-formed concrete collar at Station No. 15+45 just north of the existing Slater Avenue Pump Station. It appears that the County Flood Control just dumped concrete around the change-of-direction joint fitting in lieu of a smooth, circular concrete collar. The contract drawings indicated there was approximately one foot of clearance to protect the storm drain in place, but after trench excavation it was determined there was encroachment in the crown of the Districts' 42-inch V.C.P. line. Item 4, in the negotiated amount of$3,000.00, is for upsizing the steel casing for the jack-and-bore operation from a 66-inch to a 72-inch to allow for rails, skids, grout holes and slick lines spacing requirements. This jack-and-bore operation was located in the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Slater Avenue between Station Nos. 4+28.00 and 5+52.00 and was used in lieu of the open cut method due to utility congestion and to minimize traffic disruptions. Districts' standards indicated that for a 42-inch V.C.P., a 66-inch steel casing diameter was sufficient, but construction requirements on a very flat grade such as this required limited tolerance to maintain sensitive grade requirements. The calculated minimum casing size was 67.4 inches to minimize deflection during the jacking operation. The contractor supplied the upsized 72-inch internal diameter by thick casing from his existing inventory at minimal -6- i September 14, 1994 extra cost. The majority of the incremental cost for this item is for the extra grout required between the casing and the pipe. Item 5, in the amount of$1,405.00 and 1 calendar day, is for an installation time delay on the 42-inch V.C.P. due to a 6-inch water line crossing the trench at a depth of 4 feet greater than shown on the contract drawings. The deeper crossing and fragile nature of the asbestos concrete water pipe required the shut down of the water line by city crews. City of Huntington Beach Water Department as-built drawings did not accurately depict the depth from finish grade. The 6-inch water line was constructed with three 3-foot lengths of pipes with four 45'elbow fittings in this crossing location to siphon below two adjacent telephone duct banks. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost to date of the change orders on this contract will be a net deduction of$6,637.00 with 14 calendar days time extension. This represents an overall decrease of 0.117% under the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for an addition of $20,988.00 and 14 calendar days time extension to the contract with Colich Bros., dba Colich & Sons. DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 9(g): APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER BETWEEN BITTER POINT PUMP STATION AND THE ARCHES (NEWPORT BOULEVARD). CONTRACT NO. 5-37-3, AND BALBOA BOULEVARD SEWER MAIN AND ABANDONMENT OF 47TH STREET PUMP STATION, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. Colich and Sons has completed the first phase of a large contract in Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) in Newport Beach for rehabilitation of the old "Plan 401" gravity sewer originally built in 1936 [see Agenda Item 9(h)]. The first phase preceded the rest of the work because CALTRANS was repaving PCH between Dover Drive and The Arches (Newport Boulevard) . The second phase, from The Arches to Bitter Point Pump Station (easterly of the Santa Ana River), is more complicated in some ways because it involves a joint project between Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 and the City of Newport Beach to both replace the old "Plan 401" gravity sewer and to allow Newport Beach to abandon one of its sanitary sewage pump stations. (The "Plan 401" sewer was originally built and operated by the City and later transferred to the Sanitation Districts in the early 1950s.) This is being accomplished by lowering the profile of the Districts Nos. 5 and 6 gravity sewer and by rebuilding a portion of the local sewers for Newport Beach which would -7- September 14, 1994 otherwise flow into their pump station, and connecting them to the Districts' gravity sewer. Districts Nos. 5 and 6 will do the work as part of the overall contract, and the City of Newport Beach will reimburse the Districts for their portion of the work. The estimated cost of work to be reimbursed by the City is $125,500 plus $10,000 for administration and inspection, for an estimated total of$135,500. The items appearing on the agenda are: (1) approval of Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Newport Beach, and (2) approval of plans and specifications for said contract. Staff recommends approval of both items on the agenda for said contract. The bid date is tentatively set for October 11, 1994. The engineer's estimate is $2.0 million. 9(h): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS NOS. 2 AND 3 TO REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, BETWEEN THE ARCHES (NEWPORT BOULEVARD) AND DOVER DRIVE, CONTRACT NO. 5-37-4. AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE. This item has been carried over from the August 10, 1994 Board meeting due to lack of a quorum in District No. 6. In May 1993, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-37-4, Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive in the City of Newport Beach. This sewer is used to transport wastewater collected jointly from portions of the collection systems of the City of Newport Beach and the southern sections of the City of Costa Mesa to Treatment Plant No. 2. The $1.7 million project consists of a new 30-inch vitrified clay pipe (V.C.P.) gravity sewer from Dover Drive to the Rocky Point Pump Station (at the Balboa Bay Club) and the rehabilitation of the existing 24-inch V.C.P. gravity sewer from west of the Rocky Point Pump Station to Newport Boulevard. The rehabilitation consisted of inserting a flexible polyethylene liner pipe into the existing pipe. The rehabilitation work also included complete removal of existing manholes and construction of new manholes. In addition, there is a reimbursement agreement with the City of Newport Beach associated with this project for construction of city laterals and manholes. This contract is now complete. This project was designed by Boyle Engineering Corporation and awarded to Colich Bros., Inc., dba Colich & Sons in July 1993. Change Order No. 2 adds $118,439.00 and a 57 calendar-day time extension to the contract for one item of added work. The change was caused by undisclosed site conditions that were unknown when designs were developed. Work along Pacific Coast Highway has consistently proven nettlesome because of the age and number of conflicting utilities and the lack of good documentation. Change Order No. 3 adjusts the engineer's quantities for a net deduction of$61,158.36. -8- September 14, 1994 (1) Chancre Order No. 2 Item 1, in the amount of$118,439.00 and a 57 calendar-day time extension, represents the additional costs incurred during the excavation for and installation of the new 30-inch V.C.P. gravity sewer line plus two manholes within the median of Pacific Coast Highway on the west side of the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Dover Drive. During excavation the contractor discovered previously undisclosed contaminated soil that contained high levels of volatile organic vapors coming most probably from leaking underground gasoline storage tanks that were part of service stations that once stood at this intersection more than 25 years ago. These vapors were so strong that it caused the contractor's employees nausea and headaches. As a result, all work came to a stop. The Districts contacted the County of Orange Health Care Agency, and they, in turn, contacted CALTRANS who, in turn, took responsibility to rectify the condition. CALTRANS obtained the services of Engineering- Science, Inc. Industrial Hygienists, who were granted full authority to act on behalf of the Orange County Health Department. Their responsibility was to test the soil, monitor the work environment, implement a health and safety plan, and arrange for the transport and disposal of the contaminated soil to a suitable hazardous waste dump. Part of the health and safety plan required that all employees on site have 40 hours of hazardous material training and have had a recent 8- hour OSHA refresher course. Also, medical monitoring for each worker and constant monitoring of the soil as it was excavated was required. The required monitoring greatly slowed down the progress of work resulting in added labor and equipment costs. Because there is no clear responsible party for the contaminated conditions (due to multiple owners of the gas station property over the years), it appears recovering the costs will be very difficult. Therefore, the costs of the services from Engineering-Science, Inc. and the hauling and disposing of contaminated material was borne by CALTRANS. The costs of hauling in clean soil and the added costs caused by slow production and delays were borne by the Districts. The above change would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. There were no additional costs over-and-above what would have otherwise been incurred had the conditions been shown in the original contract drawings. (The contract provides for liquidated damages of$1,000.00 per calendar day for the rehabilitation work from Rocky Point Pump Station to Newport -9- September 14, 1994 Boulevard and $500.00 per calendar day for the overall project including the new sewer from Rocky Point Pump Station to Dover Boulevard.) Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for a net addition of $118,439.00 and a 57 calendar-day time extension to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons. (2) Change Order No. 3 Change Order No. 3 is the adjustment of engineer's quantities for a net deduction of$61,158.36. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for a deduction of $61,158.36 from the contract with Colich Bros., Inc., dba Colich & Sons. If the Districts approve Change Orders 2 and 3, the total cost of the change orders on this contract will be$125,398.14. This represents an increase of 7.75% over the original contract. (3) Acceptance of Contract as Comolete Colich Bros., Inc., dba Colich & Sons, has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Staff therefore, recommends adoption of the resolution attached with the agenda material, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $1,799,937.14. DISTRICT 7 9(i): APPROVE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY FOR INCLUSION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT WORK WITH PARALLEL AND REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF LEMON HEIGHTS SUBTRUNK SEWER, LA COLINA DRIVE TO NEWPORT BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 7-22. The Lemon Heights Sewer, (Contract Nos. 7-3 and 7-3A), was constructed circa 1962 to serve the area generally bounded by Newport Boulevard, La Colina Drive and Skyline Drive. The Districts' 1989 Master Plan found much of the Lemon Heights Sewer system hydraulically deficient, requiring parallel or replacement sewers to meet future needs. The 1989 Master Plan recommended the 8-and 10-inch sewers be relieved or replaced with 12- and 15-inch parallel and/or replacement sewers. Surcharges in the system, particularly in the 1992-93 rainy season, have forced this -10- September 14, 1994 work ahead of planned schedules. High infiltration of rainwater occurred. Smoke tests performed on portions of the system found a few illegal yard drains connected to the sewer system. These connections have been corrected. The main problem is due to the location of the sewer in a low-lying area, which results in rainwater infiltration. In June 1993, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for the preparation of plans and specifications for the Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22. In August 1993, the Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design and construction services for Contract No. 7-22. The first phase of the design was to prepare a Project Report to review the hydraulic capacity findings of the 1989 Master Plan, incorporate changes in the drainage area boundaries ,and to mitigate against high rainwater infiltration. The "bottom line" of the Project Report is an increase in the recommended pipe sizes to 15 inches in the case where the original recommendation was 12 inches, and to 18 inches in those cases where the original recommendation was 15 inches. The final design is now 75% complete. During the preliminary design it was determined that this project was scheduled to follow a County of Orange Environmental Management Agency (EMA) road resurfacing project on Skyline Drive and Arroyo Avenue, and that an EMA road widening project was to follow the District's project on a portion of Skyline Drive. Skyline Drive and Arroyo Avenue are both within the limits of the CSD 7 subtrunk sewer. District's and EMA staff have met and concurred that combining the street resurfacing and widening work with the District's subtrunk sewer work would greatly reduce the public inconvenience in the area and prevent duplication of work between the two agencies. A reimbursement agreement has been drafted and reviewed by Counsel from both agencies. The reimbursement agreement is for the street resurfacing and widening work to be incorporated into the CSD 7 subtrunk sewer project and for EMA to reimburse CSD 7 for the construction costs, and inspection and administration costs, up to 5% to the total costs of the EMA portion of the work. Staff recommends approval of the Reimbursement Agreement. 90): RECEIVE, FILE AND INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION NO. 144 - POMEROY ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7. The District has received a request from Mr. and Mrs. Leason F. Pomeroy, III, and Dr. and Mrs. William H. Metzger to annex 1.44 acres. This territory is in the vicinity north of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Foothill Boulevard in the Lemon -11- September 14, 1994 Heights area of unincorporated County area. This area has about 122 acres left for annexation to the District. The property is currently inhabited with two single-family dwellings. The property owners have requested that the annexation fee be waived on .11 acres of area (County Road, Lot Y, shown on annexation map). Staff asked the owners to include Lot 'Y' in this annexation to avoid an island of unannexed territory, and therefore recommend waiving the fee for this .11-acre area. This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange RE A.B. 8, Tax Exchange for Annexing Properties, under which the District no longer receives a percentage of the basic levy and, instead, collects a higher annexation fee. The annexation fee is $6,457.39. Staff recommends approval of the resolution attached to the agenda material initiating proceedings for Annexation No. 144 - Pomeroy Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7. ALL DISTRICTS 11: MINUTES AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE. The Special Selection Committee Re Computers met on August 17, the Executive Subcommittee on August 24, and the Executive Committee on August 25, 1994. Enclosed for the Directors are the draft minutes of their respective meetings including recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 12: MINUTES AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE. The Joint Works Selection Committee met on August 25, 1994. Enclosed for the Directors are the draft minutes of the Committee meeting, including recommendations for consideration by the Boards. DISTRICT 2 13: MINUTES AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DISTRICT 2 SELECTION COMMITTEE. The District 2 Selection Committee met on August 16, 1994. Enclosed for the Directors are the draft minutes of the Committee meeting, including recommendations for consideration by the Boards. -12- September 14, 1994 DISTRICT 3 14: MINUTES AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DISTRICT 3 SELECTION COMMITTEE. The District 3 Selection Committee met on August 17, 1994. Enclosed for the Directors are the draft minutes of the Committee meeting, including recommendations for consideration by the Boards. DISTRICT 6 15: ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING ADJUSTMENT OF SHARES OF VARIOUS DISTRICTS OF THE COST OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS FOR JOINT FACILITIES PERTAINING TO 1990-92 SERIES "C" CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION. This item has been carried over from the August 10, 1994 Board meeting due to lack of a quorum in District 6. Districts 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 11 have been funding and constructing certain facilities pursuant to an Agreement for Acquisition and Construction dated July 1, 1992, in connection with the $98,500,000 Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Series "C" Certificates of Participation (COPS). The series "C" project funds have been allocated to each of the Districts based on expectations of construction projects and timing estimated prior to July 1, 1992. Since that time, as might be expected, a number of projects have experienced changes due to low project bids and project rescheduling. Federal tax laws generally require that the funds received from the COPS must be spent within two years to avoid having to calculate and pay "arbitrage rebate" to the federal treasury. Under the two-year exception rule, a rigid test applies requiring that each District spend project funds pursuant to specified percentages in six-month increments, in accordance with the District allocations specified under the Acquisition and Construction Agreement. At the June 1994 Fiscal Policy Committee meeting, the Committee authorized staff to engage Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (special counsel) to review with staff whether District No. 11 will comply with the two-year spending test, (because delays have resulted in reduced construction expenditures), and to review the potential requirements for reallocating Series "C" COP project costs among the participating Districts to ensure that 100% of proceeds have been spent prior to September 1, 1994, for purposes of calculating arbitrage rebate. This reallocation would be similar to an action taken for District No. 5 Series "B" project costs in 1993, and will have no cost impact on the other Districts. -13- r September 14, 1994 Special counsel and staff have completed a review of Series "C" project funds for compliance with the two-year spending test, and have concluded that by reallocating project costs among the participating Districts, 100% of Series "C" project funds will be spent by September 1, 1994, in compliance with the two-year spending test. The Resolution attached to the supporting agenda material for Reallocation of Certain Improvements Financed by the 1990-92 Series "C" COPs will accomplish the reallocation of project costs as described above. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends approval of the Resolution for Adjustment of Shares of Various Districts of the Cost of Certain Improvements to Joint Facilities Pertaining to 1990-92 Series "C" Certificates of Participation by Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 11. NOTE: Districts 1, 2, 3, 7, and 11 approved the action in August 1994, ALL DISTRICTS 16: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are authorized by law to be discussed and acted upon in a session that is closed to the public. All items to be discussed at this meeting are listed under Agenda Item No. 16 unless a matter has arisen subsequent to posting the agenda. -14- AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O. Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 MINUTES OF JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE Thursday, August 25, 1995 at 8:30 p.m. A meeting of the Joint Works Selection Committee of the County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California was held on Thursday, August 25, 1995 at 8:30 p.m., at the Administrative Offices of the Districts.. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: SELECTION COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: John C. Cox, Jr., Joint Chairman Blake P. Anderson, Director of Peer A. Swan, Vice Joint Chairman Engineering APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JUNE 8. 1994 MEETING. The minutes of the June 8, 1994 Joint Works Selection Committee were approved as drafted. ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BLACK & VEATCH RE CHEMICAL AND WASTEHAULER FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-46. AND CHEMICAL AND PLANT WATER FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-55. In April 1993, the Directors awarded the design of Jobs Nos. P1-46 and P2-55, which included replacing liquid chlorine with hydrogen peroxide for dosing the incoming raw sewage to control odors in our treatment facilities at both plants, and modifications to the plant water facilities at Plant No. 2. The Operations Division subsequently requested that the chemical feed facility at the North Scrubber Complex be redesigned to feed sodium hypochlorite, rather than hydrogen peroxide as earlier directed, and provide a transfer system at the emergency effluent discharge disinfection chemical feed facility to deliver sodium hypochlorite to the North Scrubber Complex. The reason for this change is to ensure turnover of the sodium hypochlorite, stored at the emergency effluent discharge disinfection facility, which has a short shelf life. We have sodium hypochlorite to comply with the disinfection requirement of our NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit in the unlikely event of an emergency discharge into Minutes of Joint Works Selection Committee Meeting August 25, 1994 Page 2 the Santa Ana River. In the absence of a needed use, approximately $112,000 of sodium hypochlorite would degrade each year. However, staff estimates that by providing turnover for sodium hypochlorite by using it in the scrubbers, we will provide a net reduction in chemical cost of about $100,000 per year. The cost of using sodium hypochlorite is partially offset by the avoided cost of using hydrogen peroxide. Staff recommended that the agreement with Black &Veatch be amended to provide additional funds in the amount of$11,100.00 for added engineering services for the redesign of the North Scrubber Complex sodium hypochlorite facility, and the design of transfer pumps and transmission line at the emergency disinfection facility, as follows: Proposed Existing Proposed Revised Agreement Addendum Agreement Engineering Services (direct labor at hourly rates, plus overhead at 139%) not to exceed $310,588 $11,100 $321,688 Direct Expenses, at cost, not to exceed 38,127 0 38,127 Fixed Profit 31,000 0 31,000 Total Contract Amount Selection Committee Recommendation After discussions with staff, the Selection Committee recommends approval of Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch providing for additional design services for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, for an addition of$11,100 to the contract. Attached is a copy of the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee. Minutes of Joint Works ' Selection Committee Meeting August 25, 1994 Page 3 ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MONTGOMERY WATSON AMERICAS, INC. RE AIR EMISSIONS INVENTORY AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT TO COMPLY WITH AB 2588. The California Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987, known as AB 2588, required California facilities to prepare air toxics emissions inventory and health risk assessment reports. To comply with AB 2588 requirements, the Districts engaged Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc., formerly James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. (Consultant), in December 1990, to provide the necessary testing, database modeling and report preparation for the first year's report for 1991. The scope of work to comply with the reporting tasks required under AB 2588 included: (1) Compile all field data. (2) Develop emission estimates for each compound in accordance with SCAOMD guidelines. (3) Calculate specific emission factors based on the daily mass emission rate, annual average emission rate and maximum hourly emission rate. (4) Develop a computer database for estimating emissions from each source, and allow the input and extraction of relevant data and presentation of graphics and statistical analysis. (5) Complete separate toxic inventory reports for Plants 1 and 2, following SCAQMD and CARB reporting formats. The formals will also include detailed facility plot plans, facility descriptions, process flow diagrams and other relevant information. (6) Develop facilities modeling to be used for modeling the source emissions and the meteorological and receptor locations for each treatment plant. (7) Estimate the population within the zone of impact. (8) Perform a health risk assessment in accordance with SCAQMD protocols. The health risk assessment to include maximum individual cancer risk and excess cancer burden of the surrounding population, as well as on-site employees, if any. The health risk assessment to also include, in the form of technical memoranda, prioritization of sources within our facilities and a listing of target compounds of concern and process control strategies. Minutes of Joint Works Selection Committee Meeting m° August 25, 1994 Page 4 (9) Complete the emissions inventory report and health risk assessment report in accordance with the requirements of AB 2588. Total compensation to be paid to the Consultant for services under the existing contract is an amount not to exceed $398,000, as shown in the following table, for preparation of an Air Toxics Emission Inventory Report and a Health Risk Assessment Report. At the time, the reports were to be updated biannually. In 1994, the law was amended to allow for updates every four years. The Consultant, with active participation from the Districts' Air Quality Division staff, completed the original project in November 1991 at a cost of$234,960.45. This enabled the Consultant to complete the SCAQMD-mandated AB 2588 biannual update report(s) and for development of an AB 2588 database for$136,000 without having to seek additional funding authorization. The update included source testing, modeling and report preparations, and required the Consultant to subcontract for sampling, analytical and computing services. However, while the Consultant's total expenses were within the authorized amounts, with significant savings in labor and overhead, expenses to outside subcontractors (direct expenses) exceed amounts in the original agreement by $86,003. Staff is therefore requesting approval of Addendum No. 1 to the original Professional Services Agreement with Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc., providing for a reclassification of expenditures as shown in the table below to reflect the actual breakdown of expenses by the Consultant, but with no change in the total authorized compensation. Proposed Existing Proposed Revised Aareement Addendum Agreement Engineering Services (direct labor at hourly rates, plus overhead) not to exceed $300,860 ($86,003) $212,212 Direct Expenses, at cost, not to exceed 45,227 86,003 133,875 Fixed Profit 51,913 0 51,913 Total Contract Amount 398 000 $__ 0 398 00 Minutes of Joint Works Selection Committee Meeting August 25, 1994 Page 5 The addendum also provides for the consulting firm's name change from James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. to Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. Selection Committee Recommendation The Selection Committee recommends that Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc., be approved, providing for a reallocation of costs between categories for no increase in total compensation. Attached is a copy of the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee. ADJOURNMENT At approximately 9:00 p.m., the Selection Committee adjourned. .pm,.mq.maouw COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92700-7010 (714)002.2411 A IgLmt 25,1904 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement with Black&Veatch in Connection with Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications,Job No. P1-46,and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications,Job No.P2-55 In accordance with the Districts'procedures for selection of professional engineering services,the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for Addendum No. 1 wth Black&Veatch for additional engineering services for the redesign of the North Scrubber Complex sodium hypochlorite facility and the design of transfer pumps and transmission line at the emergency disinfection facility In connection with Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications,Job No.P1-46,and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications,Job No. P2-55,on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead,plus direct expenses, and fixed profit,increasing the contract amount by$11.100.00,as follows: Existing Change per Revised Aareement Addn.No. 1 Agreement Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 139%), not to exceed $310,588 $11,100 $321,688 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 38,127 0 38,127 Fixed Profit 31,000 0 31,000 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $372T1.5 $1 l The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result In excessive profits for the consultant. Is/John C.Cox.Jr. /s/Peer A. Swan John C.Cox,Jr. Peer A.Swan Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Blake P.Anderson Blake P.Anderson Director of Engineering Selection Committee COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 4 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA J P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10544 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 �p�MQE (714)962-2411 August 25, 1994 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10" Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 1 to Professional Services Agreement with Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc. (formerly James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc.) in Connection with Air Toxics 'Hot Spots'Act of 1987 (AB 2588) In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for Addendum No. 1 with Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc„ providing for a name change and a reallocation of the costs among the categories In connection with Air Toxics'Hot Spots"Act of 1987 (AB 2588), on an houdyrate basis Including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, and fixed profit, as follows: Existing Change per Revised Agreement Addn. No. 1 Aareement Engineering Services (direct labor at hourly rates, plus overhead at 179%), not to exceed $300,860 ($86,003) $212,212 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 45,227 86.003 133,875 Fixed Profit 51,913 _g 51,913 Total Contract Amount B o .$796.000 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fees as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fees will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /3/John C. Cox. Jr. /s/Peer A. Swan John C. Cox, Jr. Peer A. Swan Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /a/Margie Neilor Margie Nellor Director of Technical Services Selection Committee AGENDA ITEM NO. 13 County sanitation Districts Yof Orange County,Caliromia P.O. Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 MINUTES OF DISTRICT NO. 2 SELECTION COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, August 16, 1994 at 9 A.M. A meeting of the Selection Committee of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California was held on Tuesday, August 16, 1994 at 9 a.m. at the Districts' Administrative Offices. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: SELECTION COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: John Collins, Chairman, District No. 2 Blake P. Anderson, Director of Iry Pickier, Chairman pro tem, District No. 2 Engine,.ing Thomas M. Dawes, Project Manager APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 2. 1992 MEETING The minutes of the August 2, 1994 Selection Committee Meeting were approved as drafted. APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PREPARATION OF PROJECT REPORT RE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE EROSION PROTECTION AND ACCESS ROADS, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-5R2. In February 1994, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate a professional services agreement for preparation of an engineering project report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Manhole Erosion Protection and Access Roads, Contract No. 2-14-5112. Between Weir Canyon Road and Prado Dam, the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) line was built within the river bottom, an area now designated a natural river. The line was repaired in 1980 and again in 1986 after suffering flood damage. Because of changes in the river bottom, site inspections have been conducted and we have been unsuccessful in locating all of the manholes in this reach. Consequently, the condition of all the manholes is unknown. Routine maintenance of the sewer and protection of the manholes are essential to prevent sewage spills into the river; however, state and federal agencies have not issued the necessary permits for such maintenance. Staff is therefore proposing that an engineering project report for this line be prepared for this reach, which would analyze the following alternatives: Minutes of District No. 2 Selection Committee Meeting y August 16, 1994 Page 2 1. Repair and provide access to the line, obtaining necessary permits; or 2. Abandon the line and rebuild it, identifying a funding source. (The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) owns the majority of the capacity rights in the upper portions of SARI.) Staff explained to the Committee that the Districts have been unsuccessful in obtaining federal permits in the past through normal administrative channels. The project report will determine the permit requirements (and if permits can be obtained) to construct and maintain access roads to this reach of the SARI. The report will also determine if an alternate alignment in or adjacent to La Palma Avenue is feasible, which would ensure maintenance access and eliminate the potential for manhole washout or lrunkline washout (either of which could lead to damage at Treatment Plant No. 2 and/or a raw sewage spill into the river). Also in February, the Directors accepted a project report for Contract No. 2-31, which recommended paralleling a hydraulically deficient portion of the SARI line between Grove Street and Yorba Regional park, within La Palma Avenue. Since that time, the City of Anaheim has opted to build a 69 KV power duct in, or very close to, the recommended alignment over about two miles (Grove Street to Kellogg Drive). For this reason, the scope of work includes reevaluating this project. Requests for proposals were sent to Black and Veatch, BSI, Holmes and Narver, and Greiner. All submitted proposals which were reviewed by the Committee. The Committee also reviewed a staff-prepared proposal evaluation. Selection Committee Recommendation The Committee discussed the proposals and because of Holmes and Narver's expertise and experience with Santa Ana River projects, and the expertise of the proposed team in environmental and permitting issues, as well as their understanding of the proposed project, the Selection Committee has negotiated a Professional Services Agreement with Holmes and Narver to prepare the Project Report, based on hourly rates including labor, overhead and direct expenses, plus subconsultants fees and fixed profit, for an amount not to exceed $376,729.00. Attached is a copy of the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:50 a.m. engY mrde`,M1694.min �11 1h COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 1' jJ hf p,Y�, hk JE OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 N 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 �rh4l COV„' (714)962-2411 August 16, 1994 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver in Connection with Santa Ana River Interceptor Manhole Erosion Protection and Access Roads, Contract No. 2-14-5R2 In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Holmes & Narver for the preparation of a project report in connection with Santa Ana River Interceptor Manhole Erosion Protection and Access Roads, Contract No. 2-14-5R2, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus subconsultants fees and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $376,729. Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 166%, not to exceed $284,206 Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 65,000 Fixed Profit 27,523 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed 5376.729 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Is/John C. Collins Is/Iry Pickier John C. Collins, Chairman Iry Pickier, Chairman pro tern District No. 2 District No. 2 Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Blake P. Anderson Blake P. Anderson Director of Engineering Selection Committee AGENDA ITEM NO. 14 County sanitation Districts of Orange County,California P.O.Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 MINUTES OF DISTRICT NO. 3 SELECTION COMMITTEE Wednesday, August 17, 1994 at 7:30 a.m. A meeting of the Selection Committee of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California was held on Wednesday, August 17, 19954 at 7:30 a.m. at Mimi's Cafe in Garden Grove. The roll was called and a quorum declared present, as follows: SELECTION COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: Sal Sapien, Chairman Blake P. Anderson Burnie Dunlap, Chairman pro tem Director of Engineering John Dettle, Project Manager APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DGA CONSULTANTS INC. RE REHABILITATION OF MAGNOLIA TRUNK SEWER. ORANGETHORPE AVENUE TO ELLIS AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 3-35R. AND SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR SEWER MANHOLE REHABILITATION, BETWEEN WESTMINSTER BOULEVARD AND 405 FREEWAY, CONTRACT NO. 3-11 R. The Magnolia Trunk Sewer, located between Orangethorpe Avenue and Ellis Avenue in Magnolia Street and Bushard Street, was constructed circa 1951, under the jurisdiction of the Joint Outfall Sewer Organization, the predecessor authority to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. The sewer line consists of approximately 19,000 feet of 39-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) and 44,000 feet of reinforced concrete pipe varying in size from 39 to 78 inches. The original contract included the construction of 64 manholes. Since that time, six additional manholes have been constructed under separate contracts. Staff has investigated the condition of this sewer by videotaping the entire Magnolia Trunk Sewer between Orangethorpe and Ellis Avenue and conducting a comprehensive manhole survey and found that the 40-year old manholes have deteriorated and are in need of repair. Staff also surveyed the condition of nine manholes along the Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor between the Seal Beach Pump Station, located at Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Boulevard and the 405 Freeway, and found these manholes also in need of repair. Minutes of District No. 3 ej Selection Committee Meeting August 17, 1994 Page 2 In February 1992, the Directors awarded a professional services agreement to DGA Consultants, Incorporated, to design the Rehabilitation of the Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and for the Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11 R. Addendum No. 1 to the agreement with DGA Consultants, Incorporated provides for pothole plans to verify the location of utilities constructed over, or adjacent to, the existing vault-type manholes. Following the award of the contract, the Districts' Maintenance staff requested that the existing vault4ype manholes be replaced with large diameter cone and shaft-type manholes for easier ingress and egress from these confined spaces. The original intent was to rehabilitate the manholes from inside or with minimum excavation. The replacement of the original "stove-pipe" manholes with new larger cone manholes will mean that adjacent buried utilities must be carefully located to minimize interferences during construction. Selection Committee Recommendation Staff solicited a proposal from DGA for the additional design work to change the manholes. The Committee discussed the project and the proposed additional costs with staff and has negotiated Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. providing for the additional design work, based on hourly rates including labor and overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount of$13,450, increasing the total contract amount to $220,450. A copy of the Selection Committee's certification is attached. The proposed contract changes are summarized as follows: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addn.No. 1 Agreement Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 151%, not to exceed $138,300 $12,227 $150,527 Direct Expenses, at cost, not to exceed 2,000 0 2,000 Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 46,000 0 46,000 Fused Profit 20,700 1223 21.923 TOTAL AMENDED CONTRACT, not to exceed $2QLM- ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at approximately 8:45 a.m. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .pslie �I a�jl^ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA u •/ `- + P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10814 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 �4�aee cWfi' (714)962-2411 August 17, 1994 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. in Connection with Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Orangethorpe Avenue to Ellis Avenue, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, between Westminster Boulevard and 405 Freeway, Contract No. 3-11 R In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee for Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc., providing for additional design services in connection with Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, Contract No. 3-11R, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct costs, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, in an additional amount not to exceed $13,450.00. Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addn. No. 1 Agreement Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 151%, not to exceed $138,300 $12,227 $150,527 Direct Expenses,at cost not to exceed 2,000 0 2,000 Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 46.000 0 46,000 Fixed Profit 20,700 1223 21.923 TOTAL AMENDED CONTRACT, not to exceed 07 000 13 450 220 450 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS al ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Board of Directors IOB•W ELLIE AVENUE PC a0xa19 County Sanitation District No. 3 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92]2"12] August 17, 1994 P141262.2411 Page Two The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/Sal A. Saoien /s/Burnie Dunlap Sal A. Sapien Burnie Dunlap Chairman, District No. 3 Chairman pro tem, District No. 3 Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Blake P. Anderson Blake P. Anderson Director of Engineering Selection Committee COUNTY SANITATION OISTIUCTS AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNUI 1O ULIS AVFNh PO WX 8127 FD1 NNVALLEY.0 FOSNAS2)2S.B127 mn 9624411 RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS SEPTEMBER 14, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 710719E PAGE07 ,� 1 REPORT NUMBER APED ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0711319E POSTING DATE 07113/94 SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPER FUND $764.62 82 CRIER FUND 5.972.39 82 CAP FAC FUND 4.362.58 93 OPER FUND 39.245.29 93 CAP FAC FUND 338.71 85 OPER FUND 3.187.14 95 CAP FAC FUND 185.511.25 86 OPER FUND 385.28—� m 87 ORE I FO 8.073.8< m 87 CAP FAC FUND 1,971.86 2 911 OPER FUND 7.175.94 D 011 CAP FAC FUND 4,571.47 11113 OPER FUND 34.11 814 OPER FUND 71.88 810 CAP FAC FUND _ _ _ ___ _ 7,188.77 m 3 I I586 OPER FUND 4.320.07 Il '6/5886 CAP FAC FUND dI.32 .04 00 7 DR00 ER FUND 2.87311 0781/OPEN FUND 4.892.51 1 JT OPER FUND 697,827.92 CORF 1,588,070.17 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 27,600.74 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 195.793.08 599,909.96 m a ... .... CU REPORT NUMBER AP43 0. I .00 vo COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/27/94 POSTING DATE 07/27/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 139202 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $156AI PARCEL SERVICES 139203 UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. $4.78361 TECHITE CLAIM DOCUMENT COSTS 139204 VWR SCIENTIFIC $467.20 LAB SUPPLIES 139205 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $602.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139206 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $1,296,22 LAB SUPPLIES 139207 VERNE'S PLUMBING E525.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 139208 VILLAGE NURSERIES $228,35 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 139209 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $10.905.91 CHEMICALS 139210 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $2.057.64 CAUSTIC SODA M 0.8-12-92 139211 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $325.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES D 139212 XEROX CORP. $1,860.37 COPIER LEASES 1 139213 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $1.389.68 LAB SUPPLIES m 139214 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS $3,222,44 INSTRUMENTS Z 139215 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $92.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES D 139216 ZYMARK CORP. $20.601.50 LAB EQUIPMENT J,786,3]1.22 m 3 SUMMARY AMOUNT CO 02 OPER FUND 47.03 #2 CAP FAC FUND 41.50 03 OBER FUND 2.116,90 L7 67 CAP FAC FUND 16.574,73 N 95 OPER FUND 24.23 /5 CAP FAC FUND 93567,49 Lid CAP FAC PURE_._ —_._—_—_ __. —_s594.i6--I R7 OP�ITFUH6 115 69 4 17 CAP FAC FUND 7.370.16 /11 OBER FUND 15.56 CAP FAC FUND 515.490.75 1714 CAP FAC FUND __1.274.434.42 /588 CAP FAC FUND 4 688 58.E Ojai,OPER FUND 12,85 JT OBER FUND 967.606.65 CORE 651,635.39 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 46.026.65 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 199,052.36 $10,192.86 Lz a � ' n FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5103194 PAGE 01 ., REPORT NUMBER AP43 �-' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0811094 POSTING DATE OBH094 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139240 AG TECH COMPANY 560,72S35 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-91 139241 AT&T $971.46 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 139242 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $147.60 DOOR REPAIRS 139243 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $1,223.16 LAB SUPPLIES 139244 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. 5279,554.93 CONSTRUCTION PI-36-1 139245 AIR LIOUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1.624.39 SPECIALTY GASES 139246 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $8.46 LAB SUPPLIES 139247 AIR PRODUCTS 8 CHEMICALS,INC. $17,788.00 G&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89 139246 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $26.23 ASPHALT 139249 ALLWASTE SERVICES $1.713.5D VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES n 139250 AMERICAN HI-LIFT $99.27 MECHANICAL REPAIRS Cl 139251 ANAHEIM SAW SHOP,INC. $89.47 TOOL REPAIRS fn 139252 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $519.92 LAB SUPPLIES Z 139253 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $3,186.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS C7 n 139255 ANTHONY PEST STEMSCONTROL $267.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139255 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 5287.12 NOTICES 8 ADS 139256 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $14.095.65 LAB SERVICES 3 139257 AQUATIC CENTER 940.00 AIR BOTTLES 139258 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $510.68 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139259 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. 575.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL W 139M ASSOC.ADMINIS.&CONSULTANTS $160.00 INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS 1 139261 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $633.62 LAB SUPPLIES 139262 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. $193.00 BUILDING REPAIRS r 139263 AVNET COMPUTER E24,I80.64 OFFICE EQUIPMENT r 139264 AWARDS B TROPHIES $78.06 PLAQUES 139265 BKK LANDFILL $2.077.73 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO.10.9-91 C 139266 BRW SAFETY 8 SUPPLY $333.54 SAFETY SUPPLIES �-a 139267 BARTON SALES COMPANY ITT $4.925.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES N � 139269 BATTERYDIAGNOALTIESSTICS, $5,771.80 BATTERIES c, 139270 BEATER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. 55,53146 LAB SUPPLIES l"f 139271 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $213.14 TRUCK WASH TICKETS N 139272 WT BIOME ARD $442.67 LABBUILDING REPAIRS 139273 BID TECH UX NET,INC. INC. f$66.10 LAB SUPPLIES 139277 BID TECH NET,INC. 568.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139274 BLACK&VEATCH $331.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-25-1 139275 BLACK BOX CORP. $417.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139276 BOOTBARN $266,59 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 139277 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $18,748A2 ENGINEERING SERVICES 6.13.138 139278 BROWN&CALDWELL CONSULTANTS $37.462.52 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 93.101,J-19 139279 BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $1,064.09 PROFESSIONAL JOURNAL 139280 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $161.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139281 BUSH B ASSOCIATES,INC. 511,63800 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.610-92 139282 BUY-CHEM DISTRIBUTORS $1435.23 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139283 C.P.I. S057.23 LAB SUPPLIES 139284 CRC PRESS,INC. $187.45 LAB SUPPLIES 139255 CS COMPANY $3.813.76 PLUMBING SUPPLIES Cl e; FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8103194 PAGE 02 I REPORT NUMBER AP43 N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/10194 POSTING DATE OB 10194 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 139286 CADIRECTOIN $5.245.50 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 139287 CAD VENTURES $1,109.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES 139288 DARREL COHOON 8 ASSOCIATES $3,500.00 CONSULTING SERVICES,EXEC SUB COMM 139289 CALTROL,INC. $73.70 HARDWARE 139290 JOHN CARDILLO ENGINEERS $33,470.99 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pl-36 139291 GASHCO $1.433.68 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139292 CENTURY SAFETY INST.8 SUPPLY $6.508.16 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139293 CHEM SEARCH $1,713.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139294 COAST RUBBER STAMP $54.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139295 COLORADO MEMORY SYSTEMS $58.97 COMPUTER PARTS n 139296 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,444.93 ENGINE PARTS G1 139297 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $21.23 TRUCK PARTS m 139298 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2,644.33 ELECTRIC PARTS z 139299 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $2,230A3 CHLORINE M.O.10A 1-93 L7 Y 13930D CONTROL CABLES,INC. $126.91 TRUCK PARTS 139301 CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY $563.34 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139302 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $2,923.77 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8-11-93 m 139303 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $261,280.00 ENGINE PARTS 3 139304 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1,589.10 ELECTRIC PARTS # 139305 T.H.CREEARS CORP. $984.37 METER GO 139306 DME,INC. $77.35 COMPRESSOR PARTS 139307 DANIEL FLOW PRODUCTS $475.86 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139308 DAPPER TIRE $375.00 TRUCK PARTS 139309 HSK/OECKER $348.77 INSTRUMENT PARTS r 139310 DELTA MOTOR CO. $3,860.75 MOTOR REPAIRS 139311 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $6,268.89 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-11.93 O 139312 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $2.069.71 OFFICE EQUIPMENT N 139313 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $225.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL M.0.1-13-92 —I 139314 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $160.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE A 139315 ARNI DUNN,MFCC $540.00 EAP COUNSELING SERVICES C-1 139316 ESP NORTH $380.45 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES —1 139317 EASTMAN,INC. $4,006.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139318 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWARE $73.15 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 139319 ENCHANTER,INC. $5.040.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6.10.92 139320 ENERGY CONTAINER CORP. $993.96 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 139321 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $707.30 LAB SERVICES 139322 ANGUS ELECTRONICS CO. $118,62 CHART PAPER 139323 FLUID TECH.SALES $603.40 METER 139324 MARSHALL FAIRRES $78.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 139325 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5.993.76 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.D. 10-9.91 139326 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $143.25 AIR FREIGHT 139327 FILTERLINE CORP. $516.40 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 139328 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $84.13 LAB SUPPLIES 139329 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS 541,570.21 LAB EQUIPMENT 139330 FLATS VERTICAL,INC. $143.50 CONCRETE CUTTING 139331 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $383.12 PHOTO SUPPLIES ('1 ll FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/03M PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 W COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/10/94 POSTING DATE 08/10/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 139332 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $29,399.76 WATER USE 139333 FREEDOM IMAGING $164.01 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139334 CITY OF FULLERTON $277.22 WATER USE 139335 GST,INC. $503.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139336 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $3,255A9 LUMBER/HARDWARE 139337 GARRATP CALLAHAN COMPANY $1.201.95 CHEMICALS 139338 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $6.121.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139339 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,818.37 TELEPHONE SERVICES 139340 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $19,491.57 MECHANICAL PARTS 139341 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $598.01 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 139342 GRASSY S.T.I. $7.541.78 ENGINE PARTS 139343 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $531.48 PRINTING m 139344 GREAT PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. $629.68 MACHINE REPAIRS z 139345 DOA CONSULTANTS $9.600.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 D 139346 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $219A5 ELECTRIC PARTS 139347 FRED A HARPER $1,500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 139348 PL HAWN CO.,INC. $314.41 FILTERS f�Tl 139349 HAZCO SERVICES,INC. $244.07 BASIN PARTS 3 139350 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. # 139351 HEWLETTPACKARO $313.57 LAB SUPPLIES 00 139352 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $39.64 COMPRESSOR PARTS 1 139353 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO $40,502.15 LAB SUPPLIES 139354 HOLMES 3 NARVER,INC. $75,737.21 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1.44 L 139355 HOME DEPOT $1,239.60 HARDWARE r 139356 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. 5444.28 PAINT SUPPLIES f- 139357 ORANGE COUNTY FED CREDIT UNION $680.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION O 139358 IDEXX $408.43 LAB SUPPLIES 139359 IMAGING PLUS 5388.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139360 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1,120.05 CONNECTORS 139361 IS]INFORTEXT $1,341.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT n 139362 INGRAM PAPER $196.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES -I 139363 INORGANIC VENTURES $561.80 LAB SUPPLIES N 139364 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES $348.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139365 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $683.67 BATTERIES 139366 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $108.20 WATER USE 139367 ISCO,INC. $476.29 INSTRUMENT 139368 J&W SCIENTIFIC $128.37 METER 139369 JAMISON ENGINEERING $10,455.23 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 139370 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $809.91 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139371 JAVID CONTRACTORS,INC. $24,443A4 CONSTRUCTION P2-23-5.1 139372 JAY'S CATERING $161.79 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 139373 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $590.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139374 JIWS SUSPENSION SERVICE $125.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 139375 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $233.52 ELECTRIC PARTS 139376 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $942.33 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139377 KAMAN BEARINGS&SUPPLY $231.46 MACHINE SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8103M PAGE 04 ("1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 t COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O8110/94 POSTING DATE 0811001 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 139378 KARS'ADVANCED MATERIALS,INC. 54,995.00 MACHINE TESTING 139379 THE KEITH COMPANIES $972.42 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-36R 139380 KELLY SERVICES $118.80 TEMPORARY SERVICES 139381 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS 580.97 MACHINE REPAIRS 139382 KING BEARING,INC. $1.057.37 MACHINE SUPPLIES 139383 KIRST PUMP&MACHINE WORKS $85.64 PUMP PARTS 139394 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5,504.90 HARDWARE 139385 KROHNE AMERICA,INC. $230.09 METER 139355 L.A.S.INCORPORATED $7,678.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139387 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. 5553.59 SERVICE AGREEMENT 1393B8 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $198.D0 PUBLICATION 139389 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGR. $66,583.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140-1 &2 FIT 139390 CHARLES P.CROWLEY CO. 5590.62 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES z 139391 LIESERT CORPORATION $24.555.06 ELECTRIC PARTS t7 ➢ 139392 LIMITOROUE CORP. $802.45 VALVE PARTS 139393 SOHO-LYNCH CORP. $418.73 JANITORIAL SERVICES 139394 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $970.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10.92 m 139395 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $477.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 3 139396 MPS $134.63 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES # 139397 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $302,787.D0 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 00 139398 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $303.73 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139399 MATT-CHLOR,INC. 5462.12 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 139400 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS $525.00 LAB MAINTENANCE ➢ 139401 MCGARRY CENTRAL TYPEWRITER,INC. $1.666.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT r 139402 BEN MEADOWS ENVIRONMENTAL $181.44 LAB SUPPLIES F- 139403 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES $300.65 ELECTRIC PARTS t7 1394N MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $317.60 GAUGE N 139405 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS $74.514.05 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT 139406 MES COMPANY $14.156.49 REPAIR PARTS A 139407 METRA INSTRUMENTS,INC. $2,350.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS ("1 139406 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $9.606.55 MECHANICAL REPAIRS -I 139409 MISSION INDUSTRIES 56,421.77 UNIFORM RENTALS 139410 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO. $161.50 SUBSCRIPTION 139411 PAUL MONROE $216.96 ENGINE PARTS 139412 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $1.700.00 LAB SERVICES 139413 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $37.45 HARDWARE 139414 NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S 5345.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 139415 NATIONAL FILTER MEDIA CORP. $4.380.16 FILTER BELTS 139416 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 570.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 139417 NATIONWIDE PAPERS $4.253.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139418 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2,634.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139419 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $4.79 WATER USE 139420 NORTHWESTERN CARBON $2,353.26 CHEMICALS 139421 OI CORPORATION $1.121.22 PUMP PARTS 139422 OPERATION TECHNOLOGY,INC. $2.070.54 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139423 ORACLE EDUCATION CENTER $1.750.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION C'i ri FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8MV94 PAGE 05 ,. REPORT NUMBER AP43 lIl COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/10/94 POSTING DATE 08110/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 139424 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $714.96 CHEMICALS 139425 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE E5,046.48 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139426 ORANGE COURIER $89.10 COURIER SERVICES 139427 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $1,068.65 FITTINGS 139428 PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH LABS $585.00 LAB SUPPLIES 139429 PSSI $508,25 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 139430 PACIFIC PARTS $2.350.17 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139431 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. $1,832.83 PUMP PARTS 139432 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $277.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139433 PACIFIC CLAY PRODUCTS $228.69 PLUMBING PARTS 139434 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $18340 EQUIPMENT RENTALS Cl 139435 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $3729 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS m 139436 PAKWEST $1".53 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES z 139437 THE PARADIGM GROUP $14,662.20 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 139438 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 139439 PARTS UNLIMITED $521.57 TRUCK PARTS .� 139440 PASCAL&LUDWIG $117.668.50 CONSTRUCTION P243.1 m 139441 KPMG PEAT MARWICK CPA $2,9D2.00 AUDIT SERVICES M.O.&11.94 3 139442 PEDERSON COMMUNICATIONS $3.841.00 CABLE # 139443 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $520.90 LAB SUPPLIES 00 1394" PERMA SEAL $176.28 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1 139445 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $154.896.55 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.541-91 139446 PITNEY BOWES $282.14 POSTAGE MACHINE SERVICE AGREEMENT 139447 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1.262.75 LAB SUPPLIES r 139448 POLYPURE,INC. $17,948.71 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3.11-92 13W49 PROFESSIONAL FIRE PROTECTION $100.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES C 139450 PROFESSIONAL TREE CARE $8.00C.00 LANDSCAPING SERVICES N 139451 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $6,215.50 FINANCIAL ADVISOR SERVICES M.0.6/8/94 -4 139452 PROTOTYPE,INC. $269.38 COMPUTER SOFTWARE P0 139453 CHARLES PUCKETT $1,510.53 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL (l 139454 RMB ENGINEERINGIMILLTRONICS $1.966.10 INSTRUMENT 139455 R&R INSTRUMENTS $51.23 METER (n 139456 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. 548.20 LAB SUPPLIES 139457 RED WING SHOES $25&02 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 139458 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $641.45 ELECTRIC PARTS 139459 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1,319.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139460 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. $1,382.76 CHEMICALS 139461 ROAN ENGINEERING CO. $77.78 ENGRAVING 139462 ROYDES-BREAUX PROPERTY $&21 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 139483 RYAN-HERCO $433.28 METAL 139464 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $1.670.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 139465 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $807.14 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139468 SAVANT INSTRUMENTS,INC. $7,219.91 LAB SUPPLIES 139467 SCHEFUNG-PLOUGH $128.64 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139468 SCHWING AMERICA $187.84 PUMP PARTS 139469 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $21,028.75 LEGAL SERVICES ri FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE B/03194 PAGE OB t"1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 m COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O8H0/94 POSTING DATE O8l10/94 WARRANTNO. AMOUNT 139470 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1,504.68 SPECIALTY GASES 139471 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1.331.79 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139472 SEAL BLACK $53.88 ASPHALT 139473 SETCOM CORP. $8.384.05 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 139474 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $247.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139475 SHURELUCK SALES $1,899.80 TOOLSIIIARDWARE 139476 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $325.04 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 139477 SMITH-EMERY CO. $324.G0 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 139478 SMITH PIPE 8 SUPPLY,INC. $210.34 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139479. SO COAST AIR QUALITY $9,501.67 PERMIT FEES D 139480 $O.CALIF COASTAL WATER $299,740.00 DIST SHARE OF SCCWRP M.0.2-9-94 139481 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $11,801.55 NATURAL GAS 2 139482 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $7,939.07 DIESELIUNLEADED FUEL l7 139483 SOUVENIR PHOTO $102.14 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES a 139484 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $13.50 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 139485 WESTALLOY,INC. $2,112.05 WELDING SUPPLIES 1394M SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $687.82 LAB SUPPLIES TT7 139487 SPIRE TECHNOLOGIES SYS DIV. $8,941.41 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 3 139488 STRATAGENE $155.00 LAB SUPPLIES 139489 GARY G.STREED $5,056.12 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL COO 139490 STROMSERG PRODUCTS $921.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 139491 SUNSET FORD $187.39 TRUCK PARTS 139492 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $155.18 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES n 139493 TIF INSTRUMENTS,INC. $83.70 ELECTRIC PARTS r 139494 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $795.19 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 139495 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE $3.901.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT C 139496 TEKMAR COMPANY $108.07 LAB SUPPLIES N 139497 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $239.51 MECHANICAL PARTS 1 139498 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES 5836.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O. ISM ."0 139499 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $247.35 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139500 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $1.727.92 LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE M.0.5-11-94 1 139501 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY,INC f S50L16 TRUCK PARTS N 139502 TRUESDAILLABS 5508.52 LAB SERVICES 139503 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $10.042.57 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139504 TWINING LABORATORIES $3.923.94 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 139505 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $232.02 TRUCK PARTS 139508 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC 5315.00 LAB SUPPLIES 139507 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $255.41 PARCEL SERVICES 139508 VWR SCIENTIFIC 53,963.72 LAB SUPPLIES 139509 VALIN CORPORATION $1.070.75 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 139510 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1.106.37 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139511 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $72.77 LAB SUPPLIES 139512 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2.045.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 139513 VILLAGE NURSERIES $42.67 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 139514 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $56.302.15 CHEMICALS M.O.3-9.94 139515 CARL WARREN S CO. $582.46 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR ri x FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE BM3194 PAGE 07 0 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/10/94 POSTING DATE 08110/94 WARRANTNO. AMOUNT 139516 WECO INDUSTRIES,INC. $1,27606 TOOLS 139517 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $626.89 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139518 WITEG $113.14 LAB SERVICES 139519 ROURKE.WOODRUFF B SPRADLIN $49,164,40 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 139520 XEROX CORP. $16,628.39 COPIER LEASES 139521 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $10,159,60 ENGINE PARTS 139522 RAYYOUNG $35,501.05 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 139523 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $169,73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139524 ZIFF COMMUNICATIONS $2,592.59 SUBSCRIPTION 139525 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06101/94 $2,652,52862 m z v a SUMMARY AMOUNT m 3 01 OPER FUND $7,361.32 M2 OPER FUND 21,987.94 00 82 CAP FAC FUND 2,180.00 03 OPER FUND 24.036.70 1 R3 CAP FAC FUND 17,064.47 p 85 OPER FUND 4,553.90 r 85 CAP FAC FUND 316.00 A6 OPER FUND 4,745.61 ty E6 CAP FAC FUND 2,587.53 N 97 OPER FUND 7,262.75 --IE7 CAP FAC FUND 12.499.57 #11 OPER FUND 9.701.70 011 CAP FAC FUND 8,058.11 013 OPER FUND 101.72 y 014 OPER FUND 2.395.60 #14 CAP FAC FUND 9,005.85 87814 OPER FUND 345.58 JT OPER FUND 609,456.07 CORP 1,347,279.01 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 10,639.29 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 552,949.87 E2.852.528.82 x fl C7 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8118194 PAGE 01 I REPORT NUMBER AP43 L--' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O8124/94 POSTING DATE O8124194 WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139561 AB G INDUSTRIES $1,925.81 SAMPLER PART 139562 AG TECH COMPANY $55,281.12 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 139563 ATM AA,INC. $25,601.95 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING M.G.11.18.92 139564 AT&T $3.018.16 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 139565 AT&T $1,120.18 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 139560 AT&T $1.32 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 139567 AIR LIQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $924.49 SPECIALTY GASES 139568 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS ,$35.576.00 O8M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-09 139569 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO,LTD. $30.845.60 MANHOLE COVERS 139570 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $27.03 ASPHALT y 139571 AMERICAN COMPUTER&COMM. $787.07 PRINTER m 139572 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1.022.47 PAINT SUPPLIES Z 139573 AMER.SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY W17.00 PUBLICATION p 139574 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $270.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT n 139575 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $3.094.36 NOTICES 8 ADS 139576 ABC LABORATORIES $6,745.00 LAB SERVICES 139577 ARMOR-VAC $450.011 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES nl 139578 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. 5282.20 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 3 139579 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $35.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL �t 139580 ASSOC.ADMINIS.a CONSULTANTS 5255.00 INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS CO 139581 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $6.517.16 PAYROLL SERVICES I 139502 AVNET COMPUTER $3,629.32 COMPUTER WORKSTATION D 139583 AWARDS S TROPHIES $483.48 PLAQUES 139584 BC WIRE ROPE B RIGGING $457.94 WIRE r 139585 BKK LANDFILL $2.365.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9.91 139586 BANANA BLUEPRINT $1.182.62 PRINTING M.0.10-10-90 139587 BASLER ELECTRIC $150.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION (/) 139588 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3.904.66 LAB SUPPLIES A 139589 BEACON SAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $578.10 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 139590 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $247.50 LAB SUPPLIES C'T 139591 BELL SECURITY $2,133.60 SECURITY SERVICES 139592 BENZ ENGINEERING.INC. $2,233.91 COMPRESSOR PARTS N 139593 BERG POWER ENGINEERS,INC. $5,500.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 130594 BISHOP COMPANY $1,222.88 TOOLS 139595 BLACK&VEATCH $10,930.18 EMISSIONS TESTING M.O.7.14-93 139595 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $54.40 TRUCK REPAIRS 139597 BON-A-RUES $168.10 TRUCK PARTS 139598 BOOT BARN $58.09 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 139599 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $38,215.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES P141 139000 BROWN 8 CALDWELL CONSULTANTS $147,110.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 93-117 139601 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY $204.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139602 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 LAB SERVICES 139603 CS COMPANY $13.515.55 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139604 CALTROL,INC. $956.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139605 CALIFORNIA AIR TOXICS $9,740.00 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 139606 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $570.94 SERVICE AGREEMENT l7 H FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8118194 PAGE 02 - I REPORT NUMBER AP43 N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O0/24/94 POSTING DATE 08124194 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139607 CAPITAL WESTWARD $593.29 REGULATOR PART 139608 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS $524.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33 13VM CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO. $2,390.37 TRUCK PARTS 139610 CENTURY SAFETY INST.B SUPPLY $8,015.37 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139611 HELEN CHEONLEEN $7,130.39 DEFERRED COMP W17HDRAWAL 139612 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $4,658.73 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139513 COLE SCIENTIFIC,INC. $2,246.74 LAO SERVICES 139614 COUCH AND SONS $122.332.25 CONSTRUCTION 5.37-4 139615 COUCH 8 SONS $225.379.53 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 139616 COMPUSA.INC. $444.45 COMPUTER SOFTWARE n 139517 COMPUSERVE $27.56 COMPUTER SERVICES m 139618 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV, $474.32 TRUCK PARTS m 139619 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $2,230.43 CHLORINE M.O.10.11-93 p 139620 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $5,211.03 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11.93 n 139621 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. 5315.73 ENGINE PARTS 139622 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $780.71 TRUCK PARTS -{ 139623 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $486.77 ELECTRIC PARTS m 139524 DAPPER TIRE $232.31 TIRES 3 139625 PETER C.DAVID CO. $52,265.82 CONSTRUCTION 7-20 it 139626 HSKIOECKER $154.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS 00 139627 OIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $6,290.12 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-11 A3 1 139528 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. S2,698.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139629 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $3911,996.05 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT M.O.M44 139630 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 7- 139531 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $972.66 PAINT SUPPLIES l7 139632 E J L 8 ASSOC. $2.332.54 CONSULTING SERVICES 139633 ERI INTER-810 $1,601.62 LAB SUPPLIES y 139634 ESP NORTH $512.91 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES A 139635 EASTMAN,INC. $3.654.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES H 139636 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $60.17 TRUCK PARTS Cl 139637 JAMES M.ELO $150.00 REIMBURSE JUDGMENT N 139538 ENCHANTER.INC. $5,600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.8-10-92 139639 ERNSTB YOUNG $851000.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.6.8-94 139640 FMC CORP. 5509.00 LAB SUPPLIES 139541 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 55,685.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 139642 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $840.20 AIR FREIGHT 139643 FIRSTCHOICE $1,027.00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM PARTS 139644 FISCHER 8 PORTER CO. $329.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139645 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 52,666AS LAB SUPPLIES 139646 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $236.78 PHOTO SUPPLIES 139647 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $194.54 PAINTSUPPLIES 139648 GST,INC. $1,073.12 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 13 19 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $526.77 LUMBERHARDWARE 139850 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2,454.18 CHEMICALS 139651 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $217.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139552 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4,199.07 TELEPHONE SERVICES C7 Q FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6118194 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 W COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OE 24194 POSTING DATE 08/24/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139653 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $6.615.78 MECHANICAL PARTS 139654 GRASSY S.T.I. $7,261.68 ENGINE PARTS 139655 THOMAS GRAY&ASSOC..INC. $648.00 LAB SERVICES 139856 DOA CONSULTANTS $15,448.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O54I-94 139657 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $4.365.00 PUMP PARTS 139658 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $1,551.80 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139659 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $9.220.00 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 1396BO HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $779.22 TEMPORARY SERVICES 139661 HOLMES&NARVER.INC. $65.520.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1a4 139662 HOME DEPOT $312.22 HARDWARE y 139663 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $236.31 PAINT SUPPLIES m 139664 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $21.75 WATER USE 139665 HUNTINGTON ENG&EVIRON. $700.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-VOC VAPOR tv 139666 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN $343.55 BICYCLE PARTS n 139667 IMAGING PLUS $1.392.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139668 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $100.853.56 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-1&92 139W9 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $2.306.61 CONNECTORS m 139670 INSTRUMENTS FOR RESEARCH $505.20 LAB SUPPLIES 3 139671 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $150.00 PAYROLL DEDUCTION xE 139672 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $637.81 BATTERIES 139673 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $5.58 PHOTO SERVICES 139674 J.C.R.METAL STAMPING $1,163.70 LAB SUPPLIES n 139875 JH RECOGNITION CO. $104.37 SERVICE AWARDS 139676 JAMISON ENGINEERING $10,735.65 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Ir' 139677 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $215.24 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139878 JAY'S CATERING $181.49 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 139679 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $588.38 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES Vl 139680 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $520.49 ELECTRIC PARTS 139681 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $267.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139682 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 139653 KING BEARING,INC. $2,599.53 MACHINE SUPPLIES 139684 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,199,52 TOOLS N 139685 IA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $263.17 PUMP PARTS 139886 LEHMAN BROTHERS,INC. $6.232.68 REMARKETING FEE RES 94-6 139687 LIEBERT CORPORATION $450.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 139688 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $1.235.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIRONMENTAL 139869 LOCAL AGENCY $500.00 ANNEXATION FEE 139590 LOCALAGENCY $500.00 ANNEXATION FEE 139691 LORAIN PRODUCTS $1,317.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139592 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $970.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 139693 MPS $81.76 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 139694 MACOMCO $633.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139696 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS.INC. $7.758.00 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 139696 MANDIC MOTORS $35.00 TOWING SERVICES 139697 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $91.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139698 MAVERICK.INC. $19,442.25 CRANE REPAIRS C7 CJ FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8118N4 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OW4194 POSTING DATE 0824/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139699 MC APES ASSOCIATES $7,716.64 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139700 MCKENNA ENGR 8 EQUIP $403.09 PUMP PARTS 139701 BEN MEADOWS ENVIRONMENTAL $126.95 LAB SUPPLIES 139702 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $553.12 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139703 METALUBE CORP. $344.43 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139704 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $26,261.46 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 139705 MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO. $3.398.60 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 139706 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4,242.74 UNIFORM RENTALS 139707 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL $58.00 PUBLICATION 139708 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $973,352.29 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A n 139709 MONITOR LABS $271.43 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES Q� 139710 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $340.00 LAB SERVICES m 139711 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $503.95 PUMP PARTS O 139712 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $3,900.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE n 139713 NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH E5$617.00 NWRI ANNUAL CO 138714 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $fi1].]e PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139715 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $501.88 SAFETY GLASSES m 139716 OFFICE PAVILIONSANTERIOR RESOURCES $1,405.39 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS 139717 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $149A3 TRUCK PARTS 3{ 139718 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,002.35 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES GO 139719 ORANGE COURIER $133.65 COURIER SERVICES 139720 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $658.20 FITTINGS 139721 OXYGEN SERVICE $5,573.73 SPECIALTY GASES n 139722 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $4,756.55 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION r 139723 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $4.280.83 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP r 13972 COUNTY OF ORANGE , .00 PERMIT FEES b 139725 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT E5555.395395.00 GAP WATER USE M.O.6A-93 (n 139726 PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH LABS $395.00 LAB SUPPLIES 139727 PSI $263.60 HARDWARE 139728 PACIFIC PARTS $2,944.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS ('1 139729 PACIFIC PNEUMATICS,INC. $111.09 FILTER 139730 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. $1,937.01 PUMP PARTS 139731 PACO PUMPS $253.13 PUMP PARTS 139732 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $705.71 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139733 PACIFIC BELL $211.72 TELEPHONE SERVICES 139734 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $188.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 139735 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $881.13 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 139736 PAGENET $1,193.45 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 139731 PASCAL B LUDWIG,INC. $118,494.20 CONSTRUCTION PI-38-2 139738 KPMG PEAT MARWICK CPA $3,620.00 AUDITING SERVICES M.O.5-11-94 139739 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $1.308.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139740 PERMA SEAL $350.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139741 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $155,820.98 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.541-91 139742 POLY ENTERPRISES,INC. $642.67 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139743 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 139744 POLYPURE,INC. $17,351.67 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 C7 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8118M PAGE 05 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 4T COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0024194 POSTING DATE 0I24/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139745 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5.000.00 POSTAGE 139746 DANNY POWELL $4.000.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 139747 PREMIER STEEL $1.644.12 METAL 139748 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $39D.00 ICE 139749 PULSAFEEDER $118.14 PUMP PARTS 139750 QUESTRON CORP. $303.00 LAB SUPPLIES 130751 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES.INC. $5,913.52 COMPUTER SERVICES 139752 RMB ENGINEERINGIMILLTRONICS $65.54 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 139753 R S R INSTRUMENTS $383.91 ENGINE PARTS 139764 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1,715A3 TRASH REMOVAL 139755 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $457.44 LAB SUPPLIES 139756 RATTRAY AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $14,480.00 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY 3-38 fTl 139757 BOLT DELIVERY $58.00 FREIGHT z 139758 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $940.00 OCEAN MONITORING 139759 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $645.32 ELECTRIC PARTS 139760 REPUBLIC ENGINES $"1.51 TRUCK PARTS 139761 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $5,014.05 PLUMBING SUPPLIES m 139762 ROYCE PRODUCTIONS $6.300.00 PUBLIC INFORMATION VIDEO 3 139763 RYAN-NERCO $79.63 METAL 139784 SAFT/NIFE,INC. $120.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 00 139765 SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS $627.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139766 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $572.87 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139767 SANWA BANK $108,150.25 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 14-1.1A �➢, 139768 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $40.895.37 CONSTRUCTION 5-36 r. 139769 CHARLES SCWAB&CO.,INC. $38.624.62 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF 139770 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $31.940.61 LEGALSERVICES b 139771 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $97.62 SPECIALTY GASES 139772 UC REGENTS $187.00 LAB EQUIPMENT RENTAL 139773 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $1,618.00 LAB SUPPLIES 139774 SEA COAST DESIGNS $467.64 OFFICE FURNITURE n 139775 SENSUS TECHNOLOGIES $696.65 METER 139776 SF SERRANTINO $31.567,86 DEFERRED COMP PAY-OFF !n 139777 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.542.94 TOOLS 139778 SHURELUCK SALES $8.841.66 TOOLSIHARDWARE 139779 SIMS WELDING SUPPLY $7.75 WELDING SUPPLIES 139780 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $105.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 139781 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $328.13 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139782 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $136.25 TOOLS 139783 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $29.140.95 PERMIT FEES 139784 SOUTH COAST WATER $35.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139785 WILLIAM P.BECKER.TREASURER $24.000.00 SCAP MEMBERSHIP DUES M.O.7-13-94 139786 SOUTHERN CALIF.EDISON CO. $84,201.22 POWER 139787 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $33.622.12 POWER 139788 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $180,539.95 NATURAL GAS 139789 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $6,669.93 DIESEWNLEADED FUEL 139790 SOUTH SHORE WINDOW MAINT. $2.083.33 BUILDING MAINTENANCE L7 �y FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE8H8/94 PAGE06 - I REPORT NUMBER AP43 Q' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/2424 POSTING DATE 0824/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139791 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2.579.20 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 139792 WESTALLOY,INC. $476.25 WELDING SUPPLIES 139793 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCE SYST. $10,817.72 COMPUTER SOFTWARE LICENSE 139794 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $284.20 LAB SUPPLIES 139795 STERLING ART $7.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139796 GARY G.STREED $1,091.49 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL 139797 SUMMIT STEEL $1,093.23 METAL 139798 SUNSETFORD $36.52 TRUCK PARTS 139799 SUPELCO,INC. $365.08 LAB SUPPLIES 139800 TARBY ENGINEERING E450.00 PUMP PARTS D 139801 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY 5798.07 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 139802 TEKDRAULICS $2,889.56 PUMP PARTS R1 139803 TEXMATE,INC. $346.37 INSTRUMENT PARTS C 139604 THOMAS FISH COMPANY $107.25 LAB SUPPLIES n 139805 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,151.52 MECHANICAL PARTS 139806 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $262.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.618M -i 139807 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3.455.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94 fTl 13980E TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $514.42 TRUCK PARTS 3 139809 TRUESDAIL LABS 52,880.60 LAB SERVICES 4t 139810 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $10,408.65 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 139811 TUSTIN DODGE $30.19 TRUCK PARTS I 139812 TWINING LABORATORIES $5,957.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 D 139813 USA SCIENTIFIC PLASTICS $111.92 LAB SUPPLIES 139874 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC E380.50 LAB SUPPLIES r 139615 UNIVERSAL MARINE INDUSTRIES $1,890.39 MECHANICAL PARTS C7 139816 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1,A06.89 LAB SUPPLIES 139817 VALIN CORPORATION $358.52 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES (y 139818 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2.470.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 4 139819 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $208.93 BUILDING REPAIRS 139820 GUY L.WARDEN 8 SONS $1,144.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139921 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT $1.562.76 SAFETY SUPPLIES N 139822 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAB SUPPLY $74.937.71 CAUSTIC SODA B HYPOCHLORITE M.O.B-12-9284/13194 139823 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $167.57 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139824 WESCO $230.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139825 WHESSOE VAREC $121.56 VALVES 139828 WITEG $624.96 LAB SUPPLIES 139827 XEROX CORP. $305.28 COPIER LEASES 139820 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $1.989.94 ENGINE PARTS 139829 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS $150.17 OPERATING SUPPLIES 139830 YORK INTERNATIONAL $1.510.53 ELECTRIC PARTS 139831 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $174.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/15/94 $3,927,302.92 C7 c V FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/18/94 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL SUMMARY AMOUNT 92 OPER FUND 3.739.68 02 CAP FAC FUND 147.64 03 OPER FUND 87.848.05 03 CAP FAC FUND 20.832.27 05 OPER FUND 2.241.58 95 CAP FAC FUND 41.339.30 y 07 OPER FUND 7,12t51 Gl 97 CAP FAC FUND 53,493.82 fTl 911 OPER FUND 7,974.78 Z C7 911 CAP FAC FUND 225,417.92 914 OPER FUND 17.54 911 CAP FAC FUND 1,101,56161.7878 -1 03811 OPER FUND 3.900.00 3 0586 OPER FUND 2,559.03 9586 CAP FAC FUND 122.332.25 4t 9687 OPER FUND 2,428.99 00 $7914 OPER FUND 7,051.05 i JT OPER FUND 962,778.97 CORF 844,812.31 n SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 4,535.83 r JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 425,160,71 r o s3.9z7.•oz.9z N Cl (n C7 August 19 19ga COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 OMNGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA MEMORANDUM 19RAa EWS AVENUE Po.Box 91n FDUNTMN V> Y.CAUFeeNIA R2J 121 a14962. 11 TO: J.Wayne Sylvester, General Manager FROM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE SPECIFICATION NO.C-034 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, August 16,1994,for the purchase and delivery of hydrogen peroxide for a one-year period, beginning October 1, 1994. Tabulation of bids Is as follows: Price Vendor Per Callon 1. FMC Corporation S 2.252 Pleasanton, CA 2. Vulcan Peroxidatlon Systems S 2.414 Tucson, AZ 3. Van Waters &Rogers $2.5213 Los Angeles, :A 4. Pioneer Chlor Alkali Company, Inc. NO BID Huntington Beach, CA S. Western States Chemical Supply NO BID orange. CA It is recommended the award be made to FMC Corporation,the lowest responsible bidder, for a one-year contract period, starting October 1,1994. The coal estimated annual Cost Of$1,013,400.00,Including delivery.Is based on furnish Ing 450,000 gallons at a unit price of S2.252 per gallon, Including delivery and environmental excise tax, plus all applicable sales tax. Provislons are in the specifications for two (2)consecutive one�year Contract extensions. Respectfully submitted`,' gca-k '1D.17Da ], Katherine Yarosh Senior Buyer We h reb ur wf above remmmenCation: l Ted Hp an Purchasing manager Ca G.streetl Robert J.OOten Director of Finance Assistant Director of Operations FonomFxlve "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" RESOLUTION NO. 94-104 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE, SPECIFICATION NO. C-032 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE, SPECIFICATION NO. C-034, TO FMC CORPORATION .................................. The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of contract be made to FMC Corporation for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification No. C-034, and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposal submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That a Purchase Contract for Specification No. C-034 be awarded to FMC Corporation for the unit price of $2.252 per gallon, plus sales tax, furnished and delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor, for a one-year period beginning October 1, 1994, with provision for two one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 , acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign said Purchase Contract with said supplier to supply hydrogen peroxide pursuant to the specifications and purchase contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said material are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. rc6.104 "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Amelco Construction, C.O. No.: Six (6) a Division of Amelco Industries Date: September 14, 1994 Job: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-1 Consultant: Dames and Moore Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduct) $ (35,000.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES Section 51-15, Schedule of Prices, Item No. 3, allows for payment to the Contractor on a unit price basis for crushed rock if it is necessary to stabilize the bottom of excavations. Stable subgrades were found in all excavations and no crushed rock was required on this project. This items adjusts the engineer's quantities as follows: DEDUCT: Change in Quantity Item No. Unit Description From To Difference Unit Price Total 3 Cu.Yd. Crushed Rock 500 0 500 $70.00 $35,000.00 CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(35,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COSTS THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(35,000.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 CALENDAR DAYS "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Amelco Construction, C.O. No.: Six (6) a Division of Amelco Industries Date: September 14, 199 Job: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-1 Consultant: Dames and Moore The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: November 30, 1993 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: May 28, 1994 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension, 39 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 219 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Dale: July 6, 1994 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: July 6, 1994 Original Contract Price $ 1,377,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 83,575.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (35,000,00) Amended Contract Price $ 1,425,575.00 "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Amelco Construction, C.O. No.: Six (6) a Division of Amelco Industries Date: September 14, 1994 Job: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1 Consultant: Dames and Moore Board Authorization Date: September 14, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: ,f R commended by: ngineering Manager Construction Manager ate App e y Approved as to Form: Director of Engineering Dafe General Counsel T Accepted by: AMELCO CONSTRUCTION, A DIVISION OF AMELCO INDUSTRIES dI 9 Contractor Date "F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3" RESOLUTION NO. 94-105 ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-53-1 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-53-1 , AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT .................................. The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1 . That the contractor, Amelco Construction, a Division of Amelco Industries, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1 , on July 6, 1994; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1 , is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated November 30, 1993; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefore; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Amelco Construction, a Division of Amelco Industries, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1 , is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. RC5&.105 'G" AGENDA ITEM N9(d) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G" Page 1 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros.. Inc. dba Colich & Sons C. O. No.: Two (2) Date: September 14, 1994 Job: Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewaae Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Bed -aE) $ 20,988.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - TELEPHONE DUCT BANK INTERFERENCE During potholing operations, prior to the installation of the 48-inch reinforced concrete pipe (R.C.P.) sewer line between Manhole No. 20 (Station No. 39+05.00) and Manhole No. 21 (Station No. 39+30.46) a GTEC 15-3%-inch ACD-T telephone duct bank was not located as shown in the contract documents. The bottom of the duct bank was approximately four feet lower than shown on the contract drawings. The proposed new 48-inch gravity sewer could not be adjusted vertically in elevation from the designed flow line elevations. The only feasible alternative was to either reroute the telephone duct bank via an agreement with GTEC or to design and construct an alternate alignment. Initially, Districts' staff directed the Contractor to pothole along an existing 30-inch V.C. P. sewer alignment to verify the possibility of using the same trench to install the subject 48- inch gravity sewer. After a preliminary evaluation, it was determined to be more cost effective and technically feasible to enter into a reimbursement or relocation agreement with GTEC. They agreed to design a transition cross section of their duct bank to reduce the vertical height required to clear the proposed location of our pipe. In the field, GTEC splayed out the conduits to reduce the two foot vertical height cross section. This agreement was executed on March 9, 1994 for $18,128.00, The Contractor was instructed to perform the work on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)(2)(b). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $5.714.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "I-1" Page 2 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros.. Inc. dba Colich & Sons C. 0. No.: Two (2) Date: September 14, 1994 Job: Slater Avenue Pumo Station Sewage Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 2 - CHANGE IN TRAFFIC CONTROL REQUIREMENTS BY THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEER The Contractor was directed to change traffic signalization requirements at the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Slater Avenue, which represented a deviation from the City of Huntington Beach approved traffic control plans and Districts' contract drawings. The justification given to the Districts was for better traffic safety at a high traffic count intersection with lane closures, barricaded jacking and receiving pits required for jack and bore operations. The Contractor had to change all protected-permissive 5-section vehicle heads to protected left turns, 3-section vehicle heads, and install all necessary conductors. After construction is complete, the Contractor has to pick-up the 5-section vehicle heads from a city yard and reinstall. The Contractor was instructed to perform the work on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)(2)(b). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,245.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days ITEM 3 - REMOVAL OF CONCRETE COLLAR AROUND STORM DRAIN During the excavation and placing operations of the 42-inch V.C. P. gravity sewer line at Station No. 15+45.00, the Contractor excavated an encased 54-inch storm drain that was not shown on the contract documents (encasement in profile not shown). The concrete collar was in direct conflict with the 42-inch V.C. P. gravity sewer and required the conflicting portion of the collar to be removed with jack hammers and chipping guns. The Contractor was instructed to perform the work on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)(2)(b). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $8.624.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "I-2" Page 3 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros.. Inc. dba Colich 8 Sons C. 0. No.: Two (2) Date: September 14, 1994 Job: Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 4 - UPSIZING OF CASING USED IN JACKING AND BORING OPERATIONS The contract drawings at Station No. 4+28.00 to Station No. 5+52.00 called for 66-inch internal diameter by %-inch thick steel casing to be used in the jack and bore operation at the intersection of Goldenwest Street and Slater Avenue. The Districts' Standard Drawing No. S-030 indicates that a 66-inch casing size could be used as a minimum. Due to the very flat grade for the 42-inch V.C. P. gravity sewer in this reach and constructibility requirements for O.D. Bell dimensions, metal rail O.D., clearance from bell to rail, and slick line space required, the 66-inch was not suitable for the 42-inch V.C. P. as follows: 42-inch Vitrified Clay Pipe Bell O.D. 60.0" Metal Rail O.D. 2.4" Clearance Bell to Rail 1.01, Slick Line Space Required 4_0" S/T 67.4" The Contractor supplied the upsized 72-inch casing with minimal extra cost. The incremental cost was primarily for the extra grout required to fill a larger annular space between the casing and carrier pipe. The Contractor performed the work on a negotiated basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)(2)(a). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "I-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "I-3" Page 4 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 3127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros.. Inc. dba Colich 8 Sons C. 0. No.: Two (2) Date: .September 14, 1994 Job: Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage Improvements. Contract No. 11-17-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 5 - DELAY FOR PROTECTION OF WATER MAIN IN-PLACE The Contractor encountered a 6-inch asbestos concrete pipe water line crossing the trench for the 42-inch V.C.P. gravity line at a depth approximately four feet greater than shown on the contract drawings. The 6-inch water line was constructed with three, 3-foot lengths of asbestos concrete pipes with four 45' elbow fittings at Station No. 13+25.00 to siphon below two adjacent telephone ducts (9-3'/2-inch ACD-T and 6-4-inch PVC-T). The bottom leg of the siphon was located just above the crown of the Districts' 42-inch line thus making the crossing much more difficult for the Contractor. In addition, the fragile nature of the asbestos concrete pipe material contributed to the decision to call out city crews and coordinate with the water company to shut down the water line during crossing construction. The costs of this extra work includes labor and equipment for a production delay of 1'/2 hours. This work was performed on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)(2)(b). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,405.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $20,988.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 14 Calendar Days "I 4" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "I-4" Page 5 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros.. Inc. dba Colich & Sons C. 0. No.: Two (2) Date: September 14. 1994 Job: Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewaae Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 14 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: October 11, 1993 Original Contract Time: 500 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: February 22, 1995 Time Extension this C.O.: 14 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 14 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 514 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: March 8, 1995 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 5,626,370.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ (27.625.00) This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 20.988.00 Amended Contract Price $ 5,619,733.00 "I-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - DISTRICTS # & 11 "I-5" Page 6 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros.. Inc. dba Colich & Sons C. O. No.: Two (2) Date: September 14, 1994 Job: Slater Avenue Pumo Station Sewaoe Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Board Authorization Date: September 14, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by Recommended by: P• ;�:� Engineering Manager Date Construction Manager Daate Approved Approved as to Form: niL= D'irector of Engineering Date Ge ral Counsel Date Accepted by: COLICH BROS., INC. dba COLICH & SONS Contractor Date "I-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "I-6" RESOLUTION NO. 94-116 APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RE CONTRACT NO. 5-37-3 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO CONSTRUCT CITY SEWER FACILITIES IN CONNECTION WITH DISTRICTS' CONSTRUCTION OF REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, PHASE 3, CONTRACT NO. 5-37-3 .................................. WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County are engaged in a construction program wherein Districts will be constructing Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3; and, WHEREAS, the City of Newport Beach proposes to construct sewer facilities designated as the Balboa Boulevard Sewer Main Replacement from 45th Street to West Coast Highway and Abandonment of 47th Street Pump Station Project; and, WHEREAS, public inconvenience can be minimized and a cost savings can be realized by including construction of the City's facilities in Districts' project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation District Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Reimbursement Agreement dated September 14, 1994, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 and the City of Newport Beach, providing for reimbursement of costs to the Districts for construction of City's facilities in connection with construction of Rehabilitation of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3,is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That provision for reimbursement of said costs to the Districts by the City of Newport Beach, in the estimated amount of $125,500.00,is hereby approved and accepted in accordance with the terms and conditions of said Reimbursement Agreement; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 5, acting for itself and as agent for District No. 6, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. Mg.1 is "J"' AGENDA ITEM #9(9) (1) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "J" RESOLUTION NO. 94-117 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 5.37-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, PHASE 3, CONTRACT NO. 5.37-3 .................................. WHEREAS, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed project for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3,is hereby approved. Said project was included in the Program Environmental Impact Report on the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan approved on July 19, 1989. A Notice of Determination was filed by the Secretary on July 20, 1989, in accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,as amended; and, Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation, Districts' engineers', for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3, are hereby approved and adopted; and, "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g)(2) - DISTRICTS 5 8 6 "K-1" Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. RM 117 "K-2" AGENDA ITEM k9(g)(2) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "K-2" Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros. Inc.. dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: September 14, 1994 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer. between The Arches (Newoort Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduet) $118,439.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - EXCAVATION OF UNDISCLOSED CONTAMINATED SOIL During the excavation operation for the installation of the new 30-inch V.C.P. gravity sewer line within the median of the Pacific Coast Highway on the west side of the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Dover Drive, employees of the contractor began to notice the odor of gasoline. After being exposed to the gasoline odors for a period of time, they began to experience nausea and headache. At this time, all worked ceased and the Orange County Health Department was notified. CalTrans, as owners of the highway, obtained the services of Engineering-Science, Inc., Industrial Hygienists, who were granted full authority to act for the Orange County Health Department, to test and monitor the work environment, implement a health and safety plan, and arrange for the transport and dispose of any contaminated soil encountered. Those objectives were accomplished through constant monitoring of the excavation for the presence of organic vapors and appropriately stockpiling contaminated soil. The contaminated soil was hauled off-site to a hazardous waste dump site at CalTrans expense and clean soil was hauled in from an outside source at the Districts' expense. The progress of the work was slow due to the restrictions of the health and safety procedures. The contractor performed the work on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)(2)(b). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $118,439.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 57 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $118,439.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 57 Calendar Days "L-1" AGENDA ITEM k9(h)(1) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "L-1" Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros. Inc.. dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: September 14, 1994 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer. between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 5/ days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: August 2, 1993 Original Contract Time: 182 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: January 30, 1994 Time Extension this C.O.: 57 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 100 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 282 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: May 10, 1994 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 1,674,539.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 68,117.50 This Change (Add) (10eAust) $ 118,439.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1,861,095.50 "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "L-2" Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros. Inc.. dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: September 14, 1994 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer. between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Board Authorization Date: September 14. 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Re mmended by: X'figineering Manager Date onstruction Manager Date Approv y Approved as to Form :A : Q J 0v-(fb Director of Engineering Date/ Ge ral Counsel Date Accepted by: COLICH BROS., INC. dba COLICH & SONS o tractor Date "L-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "L-3" Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros. Inc.. dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: Three (3) Date: September 14. 1994 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer. between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-374 Consultant: Bovle Engineering Corporation Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduct) $(61.158.36) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 -ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: Charge b Ownedy Item No. Unit Desa4Nion From To Ddlerence Unit Rice Total 6 L.F. Binh VCP Sewer 871,01) 962.68 9168 S79.00/L F $7.242.72 8 Ea. Reconstruct Laterals IDW 16.W 6W $5DO OO/Ea 53.000,W 9 Ea, Restore Laterals 42.00 M.00 2.00 $600.00tEa $1.200.00 10 L.F. Replsce Laterals 300.00 359.00 59.00 $77AWL.F $4.50.00 18 Ea. pothole 23.W 26.00 3W S5W.001Ea S15W.W subtotal $17.485,72 DEDUCT. Change m Duaotdy gem No. Unb Deschohon From To Dilleretice Unit one Total 3 LF. 3Winch VCP Sewer 3025,00 2936,69 88.31 $INMLF $16.602.28 7 L.F. RehaMldate 2amch 3170.00 3132.00 38.00 $600WLF $2.280.00 sewer 11 V.F. 72-inh Manhole 126.00 T1om 15.60 SW5.001V.F $15.210.00 12 V.F. Remove 6Wtnth B60o Tip So $982.001V.F 58,739.80 Manholes 14 V.F. 4&bch Manhaka MM 7310 16M SBW.00N F $14,D27 W is L.F. AbaMon 21-loch sewer 298000 2070.00 110.W $9.501.F $1.045.00 20 CY. Crushed Rock. 500.00 1300 48700 S20.001CY $9.74000 WI 2-mahas below qpe 21 CY, Crushed Rock. 50000 000 500.00 $22.OWCY $1IDOODO 12-24inhes bemw pipe sumaaf $n8.644.081 "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - DISTRICTS 5 8 6 I'M-1" Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros. Inc.. dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: Three (3) Dale: September 14. 1994 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer. between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(61,158.36) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(61,158.36) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order,and no direct or indirect,incidental or consequential costs,expenses,losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: August 2, 1993 Original Contract Time: 182 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: January 30, 1994 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 100 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 282 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: May 10, 1994 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 1,674,539.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 186,556.50 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (61,158.36) Amended Contract Price $ 1,799,937.14 "'M-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(2) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 '"M-2"' Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros. Inc.. dba Colich & Sons C.O. No.: Three (3) Dale: September 14, 1994 Job: Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer. between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4 Consultant: Boyle Engineering Corporation Board Authorization Date: September 14, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Recommended by: ngineering Manager Date Construction Manager Date Appro �� Appro as Form: Director of ngineering D General FouKsel Date Accepted by: COLICH BROS., INC. dba COLICH & SONS ontractor Date "M-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "M-3" RESOLUTION NO. 94-101 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO, 5-37-4 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, BETWEEN THE ARCHES (NEWPORT BOULEVARD) AND DOVER DRIVE, CONTRACT NO. 5-37-4,AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT .................................. The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Colich Bros., Inc., dba Colich & Sons, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4, on May 10, 1994; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated August 2, 1993; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Colich Bros., Inc., dba Colich & Sons,setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 537.4, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No.5, acting for itself and on behalf of District No. 6, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. Res".101 "N" AGENDA ITEM # 9(h)(3) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 "N" RESOLUTION NO. 94-118-7 APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY RE CONTRACT NO. 7-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY TO INCLUDE CERTAIN ROAD RESURFACING AND WIDENING WORK IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF PARALLEL AND REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF LEMON HEIGHTS SUBTRUNK SEWER, LA COLINA DRIVE TO NEWPORT BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 7-22 .................................. WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County is engaged in a construction program wherein District will be constructing Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22; and, WHEREAS, the County of Orange Environmental Agency proposes to perform certain road resurfacing and widening work in the same area; and, WHEREAS, public inconvenience can be minimized and a cost savings can be realized by including County's said road resurfacing and widening work with District's Contract No. 7-22 project. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Reimbursement Agreement dated September 14, 1994, by and between County Sanitation District No. 7 and the County of Orange Environmental Management Agency, providing for reimbursement of costs to the District to include County's certain road resurfacing and widening work with construction of Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That provision for reimbursement of said costs in the estimated amount of $86,625.00 to the Districts by the County of Orange Environmental Management Agency is hereby approved and accepted in accordance with the terms and conditions of said Reimbursement Agreement; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 7 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. rap.118 AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - DISTRICT 7 "p•- PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Date: 8/18/93 TO: Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-81.27 I (We) , the undersigned landowner(s), do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex 2.5 acres (Gross - to nearest hundredth) of territory to the District located in the vicinity of Vista del Laeo and Lemon Heights Drive (Indicate adjacent street intersection or area description) in the city of Unincorporated Territory , more particularly (Indicate city or unincorporated territory) described and shown on the LEGAL DESCRIPTION and MAP enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures. The strut address of the property is: 11222 6 11171 Vista del Lag, The reason for the proposed annexation is: Sewer Service Said property is x Inhabited / Uninhabited. Number of registered voters, if any: 4 The assessed Value of the property is: $ 409,228 Also enclosed are the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAM required by the Local Agency Formation Connission (and an Environmental Impact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of $500.00 representing payment of the DISIItiCr PROCESSING FEE. Notices and ccumunieations relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following: Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. 16735 Von Ka=an, Ste. 100 Irvine. Ca 92714 Tale: (714) 474-1960 Tele: Attn: Leah C er S 0 DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF IANDCWNER 11222 Vista del Laeo Santa Ana, CA 92705 e (T mod or /printed) Wt.EL e¢ z 11171 Vista del Lazo Dr. WilliamSanta Ana, CA 92705 �(' or pzin ) "P" AGENDA ITEM #9( j ) - DISTRICT 7 "P" RESOLUTION NO. 94-119-7 AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND FILING OF APPLICATION TO LAFCO RE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO DISTRICT NO. 7 (ANNEXATION NO. 144- POMEROY ANNEXATION) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS ANNEXATION NO. 144- POMEROY ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 .................................. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That proceedings are hereby authorized to be initiated by District No. 7, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory designated as "Annexation No. 144 - Pomeroy Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7", the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution, according to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in this resolution in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985; and, Section 2. That this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code; and, Section 3. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately 1.44 acres of territory to District No. 7 in the vicinity north of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Foothill Boulevard in unincorporated county territory, to provide sanitary sewer service to said territory, which said service is not now provided by any public agency, as requested by Leason F. Pomeroy, III, and Dr. William H. Metzger, owners of said property; and, Section 4. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That this proposal is consistent with the adopted sphere of influence of the affected District; and, 'Q-1" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - DISTRICT 7 "0-1" Section 6. That the proposed Annexation No. 144 • Pomereoy Annexation to District No. 7, shall be subject to the condition that all fees required to be paid to the District must be satisfied prior to completion of the annexation proceedings; and, Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. RAN/.119 "Q-2" AGENDA ITEM #9Q ) - DISTRICT 7 „Q'2„ RESOLUTION NO. 94-106 APPROVING. ADDENDI IM NO 9 TO THE PROFFSSIONAI SERVICES FC AGREEMENT WITH CH2M HII I EQR DFglrN AND PROGRAMMING GFRVIrPC FOR IOR NO I-31 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CH2M HILL FOR DESIGN AND PROGRAMMING SERVICES REQUIRED FOR EXPANSION OF EXISTING COMPUTERIZED MONITORING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AT PLANTS 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-31, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN, SOFTWARE INTEGRATION AND STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES .................................. WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with CH2M Hill for design and programming services required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31; and, WHEREAS. Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for preparation of a study to review the existing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition ISCADA) system and recommendation of possible control system changes: and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for deletion of the specified completion deadline date of June 1994; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said agreement providing for additional design, software integration and standards development services; and, WHEREAS, Districts, acting through its Special Selection Committee Re Computers and Executive Committee, have determined the additional fees and expenses to be paid for said additional services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "R 1" AGENDA ITEM #11(b)(1) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-1" Section 1. That Addendum No. 3 dated September 14, 1994, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated April 14, 1993, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 and 14, and CH2M Hill for design and programming services required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31, providing for additional design, software integration and standards development services, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $523,300.00for traditional engineering services, and $785,900.00for software integration services, as follows, which increases the total authorized compensation from $742,148.00to an amount not to exceed $2,060,348.00: TRADmONAL TOTAL PROPOSED EXISTING DESIGN SOFTWARE PROPOSE❑ AMENDED AGREEMENT ENGINEERING INTEGRATION ADDITION AGREEMENT Ergiri labor hourly 6. labor et alum rates pus�b 1T3%, E369,054 f436,280 16a6,300 E1,082,580 St A51,604 not to exceed Dlrect Erb,at oust, not to etceed 36,000 49,900 71.400 121,2100 157,300 submrv:ullaMs, rM to exoeeJ 292,575 0 0 0 2SZ575 Fbted Prels �509 46`1M 68`200 114.3320 158,829 Total contract, rM to weed 74# 2,148 JU 3W 7E 85.900 1318200 #2.060.34B Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 , acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 3 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. MO7.10e "R-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (1) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-2" RESOLUTION NO. 94-107 - AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-20 (POSITIONS AND SALARIES) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 79-20, AS AMENDED, RELATIVE TO THE FORMATION OF THE PLANT AUTOMATION GROUP IN THE INFORMATION SERVICES DIVISION ♦ ♦ ♦ f • ♦ ♦ • • f f ♦ i The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1 . That Exhibit "B-2" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further amended to add one Systems Engineer, one Programmer/Analyst and one Programmer in the Information Services Division of the Finance Department, increasing the current authorized numbers as set forth below: EXHIBIT HB-2" SUPERVISORY AND PROFESSIONAL POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS Approximate Monthly Position Range Hourly Equivalent Classification Classif icatio Auth, No. Rate Salary 2320 Systems Engineer 1 Ell 25.93-36.69 4495-6360 2334 Programmer/Analyst 5 E7 21.35-30.20 3700-5235 2336 Programmer 4 E4 10.43-26.11 3195-4E25 Section 2 . That Exhibit "B-2" of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further amended to delete one position of Engineer in the Planning and Design Division of the Engineering Department from the total current authorized number of fifteen as set forth below: EXHIBIT "B-2" SUPERVISORY AND PROFESSIONAL POSITION CLASSIFICATIONS Approximate Monthly Position Range Hourly Equivalent Classification Classification Auth. No. Rate Salary 3114 Engineer 14 Ell 25.93-36.69 4495-6360 "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (2) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-1" Section 3 . That any other resolution or motion, or portions thereof, that conflicts herewith is hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 4 . That this resolution shall become effective September 14, 1994 . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14 , 1994 . „S-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (2) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-2" RESOLUTION NO. 94-108 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ERNST & YOUNG FOR TWO-PHASE INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF DISTRICTS'CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGEMENT FUNCTION A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ERNST & YOUNG TO CONDUCT A TWO-PHASE INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS' CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGEMENT FUNCTION, PROVIDING FOR PHASE 3, TASK 4, EVALUATION OF HUMAN RESOURCES .................................. WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Ernst & Young to conduct a two-phase independent review of the Districts' Capital Projects Management Function including current Districts' organizational structure and management practices; and, WHEREAS, said agreement only provided for the conduct of Phase 1 of said review; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for Phase 2 of the Districts' Capital Projects Management Function, and to conduct an Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance Functions; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend said agreement to provide for Phase 3, Task 4, Evaluation of Human Resources Function; and, WHEREAS, Districts, acting through its Executive Committee, has determined the additional fees and expenses to be paid for Phase 3 of said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1 . That Addendum No. 2 dated September 14, 1994, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated June 8, 1994, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 1 1 , 13 and 14, and Ernst & Young, providing for the addition of Phase 3, Task 4, Evaluation of Human Resources Function, is hereby approved and accepted; and, "T-1" AGENDA ITEM N11(b)(3) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-1" Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased for Phase 3 of the Districts' Capital Projects Management Function by an amount not to exceed $60,000.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $235,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $295,000.00. Section 3: That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 , acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. x Zlw "T-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-2" RESOLUTION NO. 94-109 FIXING AND ESTABLISHING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CONDUCT OF BUSINESS OF THE DISTRICTS (AMENDMENT NO 3 RE BOARD COMMITTEE RESTRUCTURING) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 87-51, AS AMENDED, FIXING AND ESTABLISHING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CONDUCT OF BUSINESS OF THE DISTRICTS RELATIVE TO RESTRUCTURING OF THE BOARDS' COMMITTEES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WHEREAS, Resolution No. 87-51 established rules of procedure to facilitate the orderly handling of business to come before the Joint Administrative Organization of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 and 14 of Orange County, California; and, WHEREAS, these Boards deem it desirable and appropriate to amend said rules of procedure relative to restructuring of the Boards' Committees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1. That Sections 10 and 13 of Resolution No. 87-51 , establishing rules of procedure for the conduct of business of the Districts, be amended to read as follows: "10. BOARD SECRETARY AND MINUTES - The Boards of Directors of the Joint Administrative Organization shall appoint a person to serve as Board Secretary at the pleasure of the Boards. Said person shall also be the Board Secretary of each of the individual Districts, parties to the Joint Agreement. The Secretary shall attend all meetings of the Boards of Directors, unless excused by the Chairman, and shall prepare an accurate record of each meeting for submission to the Directors and subsequent approval at the following meeting; provided, however, that when an adjourned, special or special adjourned meeting of the Board of Directors immediately precedes a regular meeting, Minutes of said meeting shall be submitted for approval at the next meeting of the Board following said regular meeting. In the preparation of Official Minutes of a meeting of the Board of Directors, the Secretary will not record the name of the Director who moves or who seconds the adoption of a motion or resolution. The Minutes will reflect the votes of Directors as required by provisions of state law. 'U-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (4) (a) - ALL DISTRICTS 11U-1" In the absence of the Board Secretary, a Secretary pro tem shall be appointed to exercise the duties of the Board Secretary." 13. STANGWG COMMITTEES: (a) STANDING COMMITTEES (e)111 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - There shall be a permanent Committee designated as the Executive Committee which shall consist of the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Each District, or the Chair Pro Tem,if the Chair is unable to attend, the Directors who represent the Orange County Board of Supervisors, and the Chairman and Vice Chairmen of the Joint Administrative Organization. Each past Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall also serve as a member of the Executive Committee provided that said person serves as an active Director of a District Board. Any-persen femmi nee-member. The Chairman and Vice Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be the Chairman and the Vice Chair of the Executive Committee, respectively. The Committee May Air B Fe@HI8F meet ng tame and flleee shell meet on the fourth Wednesday of each month, or may meet at the call of the Chairman. The Committee shall review the reports and recommendations of the other Standing Committees and may also consider matters related to the joint ownership, operation and construction of all of the Districts and make recommendations thereon to the Joint Boards of Directors. -Z- 11U-211 AGENDA ITEM #11(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-2" (b)(2) R86� F/NANCEAND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE - There shall be a permanent Fisea! Peliey Finance and Personnel Committee to advise the staff and make recommendations on is matters relative related to the financial, budgeting end personnel policies end programs of the Joint Administrative Organization. The Committee shall review with staff the procedures for development, preparation and format of the annual Joint Works budgets and recommend appropriate changes, and counsel the staff during the budget process to assure the proper interpretation and implementation of the Boards' peliey policies and that the desired procedures have been followed. The Committee '9 Rat FeSPBAS 1318 f8F Feeemmendim@ adepties at shall recommend proposed Joint Works budgets to the Exeewive The responsibility for consideration and adoption of the respective individual District budgets rests with each individual District Board. The Committee is responsible to periodically interview and recommend the selection of outside auditors. The Committee shelf review the result of the annual audit of the Districts'accounts with representatives of the outside audit Rim, including any comments received recommending improvements. The Committee shall review management's response to these comments and make appropriate recommendations for implementation. Periodically the Committee shall recommend employment of an outside firm to audit internal control procedures to safeguard the assets of the Joint Districts. -3- "U-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS aU-3a The Committee shall interview and make recommendations on the employment of investment-banking firms, bond counsel and, if necessary or desired, financial advisors to be used in connection with the Distracts'financing programs. The Committee shall periodically coordinate recommendations on personnel audits of the Joint Districts'operations or segments of the operations on an as-needed basis. The Committee sha#make recommendations on personnel policies and procedures, labor negotiations, insurers and coverage, procurement procedures, and such other related activities as may be needed or appropriate. ■ Auditets ■ Revenue PFBgF8M Folio es ■ pteaurBment Pe'ieiee ■ 7neeranee ■ Debt-FiHameiwg-Pelieiey ■ OtheF rAbid es and invest got ens, as Fequested Gemmkiee The Gammittee shall eensist of nine OWBOtBFS appointed by !he joint GhBIFMaR With the eOROUFFenee of the Ej(eeutqye Gemwktee. To the -4- "U-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-4" The Chairmen and Vice Chair of the Fi sea!-Pei iey Finance and Personnel Committee shall be appointed by the Joint Chairmen. The Fiseal Pei ey Finance and Personnel Committee shall meet on the third Wednesday of each month or at the call of its Chairmen. 13) OPERATIONS COMMITTEE- There shall be a permanent Committee designated the Operations Committee. With the goal of compliance with all public health and environmental laws and regulations, the Operations Committee she#review and submit appropriate recommendations on the matters pertaining to the operation of the Joint Treatment Works, including such matters as current and projected service/flow needs, level and quality of treatment, conservation, recycling and reuse activities and air quality issues. The Committee shall also review issues pertaining to the Districts' NPDES Ocean Outfall Discharge Permit, including annual review of the contrectorlsl performing the ocean monitoring and research programs required as a condition of said permit, and related issues regarding protection of the marine waters off metropolitan Orange County's coastline from impacts resulting from the Districts'operations and discharge of treated wastewater. The Committee shall also review matters pertaining to contractual arrangements by the Districts to provide sewerage services to areas outside the Districts'boundaries or approved spheres of influence. The Committee shall review plans for the future needs of the Districts, explore ahematives and make recommendations on solutions to the Engineering and Construction Committee. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Committee she#regularly study, visit and observe the various operational functions of the Joint Treatment Works. -5- "U-5^ AGENDA ITEM #11(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-5" The Chair and Vice Chair of the Operations Committee shall be appointed by the Joint Chair. Because of the special interest of the coastal communities in ocean issues, one representative of each member agency within the Dishicts'boundedes with coastal shoreline shall be a member of the Committee. The Operations Committee shall meet on the first Wednesday of each month, or at the call of its Chair. (4) ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE- There shall be a permanent Committee designed the Engineering and Construction Committee. The Engineering and Construction Committee shall review and submit appropriate recommendations on matters pertaining to capital projects which address operational needs identified by the Operations Committee,including the selection of professional consulting services to assist in studying, planning and designing needed Joint Treatment Works and support facilities, including computerized systems, in accordance with the Boards' established policies and procedures for procuring such services, the Committee shall further review construction projects for said facilities in accordance with applicable public works laws and Board policies. Said oversight shag include the contracts for professional services and public works construction projects and addenda or change orders thereto. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Committee shall receive "heads up"and regular status reports on the projects from staff, and monitor, visit and observe the Joint Treatment Works operational functions and major capital construction projects. The Chair and Vice Chair of the Engineering and Construction Committee shall be appointed by the Joint Chair. "8- "U-6" AGENDA ITEM #11(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-6" The Engineering and Construction Committee shall meet on the lust Thursday of each month, or at the call of its Chair. (e) c V ec T'iF STAFF ThWe 5ha" be a Beards.. !bl STEERING COMMITTEE- In addition to the Standing Committees, the Joint Chair may appoint a Steering Committee comprised of the Joint Chair, the Vice Joint Chair and the Chairs of the Operations, Engineering and Construction, and Finance and Personnel Standing Committees to assist in coordinating the flow of activities to the Committees and Boards. This Committee shall also conduct an annual performance evaluation of the General Manager and submit recommendations on compensation to the Executive Committee and the Joint Boards of Directors. The Committee shall also review the General Manager's evaluation and compensation of senior management direct reports, based on established criteria, and senior management's goals and objectives for the following year. The Steering Committee shall meet at the cell of the Joint Chair. 1W SPECIAL/AD HOC COMMITTEES- In addition to the Standing Committees, the Chair of the Joint Administrative Organization, or the Chair of a Standing Committee, or upon vote of a majority of the Districts, the Boards may appoint, from time to time, special or ad hoc committees to study and report on specific -7- "U-7" AGENDA ITEM #11(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-7" matters. Such Committees shall be temporary in nature and their assignments shelf pertain to a current, specific issue. Upon completion of the assigned task, the ad hoc or special committee will be dissolved. The Chair and Vice Chair of Special and Ad Hoc Committees shall be appointed by the Chair of the appointing authority. Special or Ad Hoc Committees shell meet at the call of its Chair. Section 2. Section 15 of Resolution No. 87-51, as amended, are hereby repealed. Section 3. All other terms and provisions of Resolution No. 87-51 ,as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective October 1, 1994. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. 4- "U-8" AGENDA ITEM #11(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-8" RESOLUTION NO. 94-110 ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL. ENVIRONMENTAL. LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES (AMENDMENT NO. 1 RE JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 90-43 ESTABLISHING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION AND PROCUREMENT OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, LAND SURVEYING AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, have established policies and procedures for the selection and procurement of engineering, architectural, environmental, land surveying and construction management services; and, WHEREAS, it is now desirable and appropriate to amend said procedures relative to the Joint Works Selection Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1 . That Section 4 of Resolution No. 90-43 relating to establishing policies and procedures for the selection and procurement of engineering, architectural, environmental, land surveying and construction management services, be amended to read as follows: "41b)(4) SELECTION COMMITTEE MEMBERS a. Joint Works (1) The members of the Standing Committee principally responsible for the project and contract under consideration for approval, together with a minimum of one staff member appointed by the General Manager, or their designees." Section 2. All other terms and provisions of Resolution No. 90-43 shall remain in full force and effect. Section 3. This Resolution shall become effective October 1, 1994. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. ^V AGENDA ITEM #11(b)(4)(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "V" RESOLUTION NO. 94-111 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAl ENGINEERING EVAI NATION, DESIGN AND CONSTRI ICTION A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BLACK & VEATCH FOR ENGINEERING EVALUATION, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES REQUIRED FOR CHEMICAL AND WASTEHAULER FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-46, AND CHEMICAL AND PLANT WATER FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-55, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES PERTAINING TO CHEMICAL FEED FACILITIES MODIFICATIONS .................................. WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Black & Veatch for engineering evaluation, design and construction support services required for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend said agreement to provide for additional engineering design services pertaining to chemical feed facilities modifications; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on August 10, 1994, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said additional services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Snrtinn 1, That Addendum No. 1 dated September 14, 1994, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated July 14, 1993, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Black & Veatch for engineering evaluation, design and construction support services required for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, is hereby approved and accepted; and, "W-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (1) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "W-1" No. P2-55, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $11,100.00,as follows, which increases the total authorized compensation from $379,715.00to an amount not to exceed $390,815.00: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addendum No. 1 Aareament Professional services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 139%, not to exceed $310,588 $11,100 $321,688 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 38,127 0 38,127 Fixed Profit 31,000 0 31,000 TOTAL, not to exceed $379,715 $11,100 $390,815 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. w1J.111 "W-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (1) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "W-2" RESOLUTION NO. 94-112 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO I TO THE PRQFESqinNA1 SERVICES ACREEMENT WITHJAMES M. MONTGOMERY CQNSUI TING FNGINFFRS, INC FOR PREPARATION OF FIVIMRIONq INVENTORY REPORT AND HFAI TH RISK A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JAMES M. MONTGOMERY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. FOR PREPARATION OF EMISSIONS INVENTORY REPORT AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT TO COMPLY WITH AB 2588, CALIFORNIA AIR TOXICS "HOT SPOTS" INFORMATION AND ASSESSMENT ACT OF 1987, PROVIDING FOR A NAME CHANGE TO MONTGOMERY WATSON AMERICAS, INC., AND PROVIDING FOR A REALLOCATION OF COSTS AND FEES AMONG CATEGORIES .................................. WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. for preparation of emissions inventory report and health risk assessment report in order to comply with AB 2588, California Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend said agreement to provide for a name change to Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc., and for a reallocation of the costs and fees among categories within said agreement; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified said reallocation of costs and fees, additional services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Sertlnn 1, That Addendum No. 1 dated September 14, 1994, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated December 12, 1990, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, Inc. for preparation of emissions inventory report and health risk assessment report in order to comply with AB 2588, California Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987, providing for a name change to Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc., and for a reallocation of the "X-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (2) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "X-1 costs and fees among categories within said agreement, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said work shall be accomplished with no increase in the total authorized compensation of $398,000.00; as follows: Existing Change per Revised Agreement Acton. No, 1 Aoreement Engineering Services (direct labor at hourly rates, plus overhead at 179%), not to exceed $3001860 ($86,003) $212,212 Direct Expenses. not to exceed 45,227 86.003 133,875 Fixed Profit 51,913 _� 51,913 Total Contract Amount 98 0 $� 0 00 Section g. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. H IJ.u2 "X-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (2)(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "X-2" RESOLUTION NO. 94-114-2 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HOLMES & NARVER FOR PREPARATION OF A PROJECT REPORT RE CONTRACT NO, 2-14-5R2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HOLMES & NARVER FOR PREPARATION OF A PROJECT REPORT RE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE EROSION PROTECTION AND ACCESS ROADS, CONTRACT NO. 2-14-5R2 .................................. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County has heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been negotiated with Holmes & Narver for preparation of a Project Report re Santa Ana River Interceptor Manhole Erosion Protection and Access Roads, Contract No. 2-14-5R2; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors on February 9, 1994, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1 . That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated September 14, 1994, by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County and Holmes & Newer for preparation of a Project Report re Santa Ana River Interceptor Manhole Erosion Protection and Access Roads, Contract No. 2-14-5192,is hereby approved and accepted; and, "Y 1" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) (1)(b) - DISTRICT 2 11Y-1" Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows, for a total amount not to exceed $376,729.00: Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 166%, not to exceed $284,206.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 65,000.00 Fixed Profit 27,523.00 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed 5376.729.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. BAe1D0.t ra "Y-2" AGENDA ITEM #13 (b) (1)(b) - DISTRICT 2 "Y-2" RESOLUTION NO. 94-115-3 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DGA CONSULTANTS. INC. FOR PERMITTING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RE CONTRACT NOS. 3-35R AND 3-11 R A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DGA CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR PERMITTING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR REHABILITATION OF MAGNOLIA TRUNK SEWER, ORANGETHORPE AVENUE TO ELLIS AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 3-35R,AND SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD INTERCEPTOR SEWER MANHOLE REHABILITATION, BETWEEN WESTMINSTER BOULEVARD AND 405 FREEWAY, CONTRACT NO. 3-11 R, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES .................................. WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County has heretofore entered into an agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. for permitting, design and construction services for Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Orangethorpe Avenue to Ellis Avenue, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, between Westminster Boulevard and 405 Freeway, Contract No. 3-11 R; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to amend said agreement to provide for additional design services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Board of Directors on June 8, 1994,the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said additional design services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 1 dated September 14, 1994, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated February 19, 1992, by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 and DGA Consultants, Inc. for permitting, design and construction services for Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Orangethorpe Avenue to Ellis Avenue, Contract No. 3-35R, and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, between Westminster Boulevard and 405 Freeway, Contract No. 3-11 R, providing for "Z-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (1) (b) - DISTRICT 3 "Z-1" additional design services, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $13,450.00,increasing the total authorized compensation from $207,000.00to an amount not to exceed $220,450.00,as follows: Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addendum No. 1 Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor, plus overhead at 151%, not to exceed $138,300.00 $12,227.00 $150,527.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 2,000.00 .00 .00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 46,000.00 .00 46,000.00 Fixed Profit 20,700.00 1 ,223.00 21 ,923.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $207,000.00 $13,450.00 $220,450.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 1 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. MDID.115 "7-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(b)(1)(b) - DISTRICT 3 "Z-2" (1 of a) RESOLUTION NO. 94-95-06 APPROVING THE ADJUSTMENT OF SHARES OF VARIOUS DISTRICTS OF THE COST OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TO JOINT FACILITIES FINANCED BY THE 1990-92 SERIES C COP ISSUE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADJUSTING THE SHARES OF VARIOUS DISTRICTS OF THE COST OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS TO JOINT FACILITIES AND AUTHORIZING CERTAIN ACTIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WH-REA,S, County Sanitation District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California (the "Series C Participating Districts") are in the process of acquiring, constructing and installing certain improvements to joint facilities and certain other public improvements (the "Series C Project"); and WHEREAS, the Series C Participating Districts have financed the acquisition, construction and installation of the Series C Project; and WHEREAS, the Series C Participating Districts are acquiring, constructing and installing the Series C Project pursuant to an Agreement for Acquisition and Construction, dated as of July 1, 1992, by and among the Series C Participating Districts (the "Series C Acquisition Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the installment payments to be made by the Series C Participating Districts pursuant to the Series C Acquisition Agreement have been assigned to Stale Street Bank and Trust Company of California, N.A., as trustee (the Series C Trustee") pursuant to an Assignment Agreement, dated as of July 1, 1992; and WHEREAS, the Series C Participating Districts have each entered into the Trust Agreement, dated as July 1, 1992, with the Series C Trustee (the "Series C Trust Agreement") providing for the preparation, execution and delivery by the Trustee of Certificates of Participation (Capital Improvement Program, 1990-92 Series C) and the deposit of certain proceeds of such Certificates of Participation in the Acquisition Subaccounts in the Acquisition Account established pursuant to the Series C Trust Agreement with respect to each Series C Participating District; and "AA-1" AGENDA ITEM # 15 - DISTRICT 6 "AA-I (2 of 4) WHEREAS, amounts on deposit in each Acquisition Subaccount are to be applied to the related District's share of the cost of the Series C Project on the terms and conditions set forth in the Series C Trust Agreement; and WHEREAS, County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California (this "District") and the other Series C Participating Districts desire to adjust a portion of this District's share of the cost of the Series C Project; and WHEREAS, this District is in the process of acquiring, constructing and installing certain improvements to joint facilities and certain other public improvements (the "Current Project") individually and in conjunction with the other Series C Participating Districts (collectively, the "Current Participating Districts"); and WHEREAS, the Current Participating Districts will finance the acquisition, construction and installation of the Current Project; and WHEREAS, this District will be obligated to make certain payments with respect to the Current Project; and WHEREAS, this District has determined that it is in the best interest of this District and the residents within the District to adjust the shares of the cost of the other Series C Project among this District and the Series C Participating Districts and the cost of the Current Project among this District and the other Current Participating Districts as provided in this Resolution: NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the District does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: In addition to other amounts allocable to County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California's ("District No. 11") share of the cost of the joint facilities included in the Series C Project pursuant to the Series C Acquisition Agreement, the Joint Agreement (as defined in the Series C Acquisition Agreement) (the "Joint Agreement"), the Series C Trust Agreement or any other relevant document or instrument, District No. 11's share of the cost of the joint facilities included in the Series C Project shall include$5,632,722 (together with earnings thereon) previously allocated to the other Series C Participating Districts in the amounts set forth in Exhibit A hereto. Section 2: In addition to other amounts allocable to the Current Participating Districts' shares of the costs of the joint facilities included in the Joint Agreement, or any other relevant document or instrument, the Current Participating Districts' shares (other than District No. I I's share) of the cost of the Joint facilities included in the Current Project shall include $5,632,722 (together with earnings thereon) previously allocated to District No. 11 in the amounts set forth in Exhibit A hereto and District No. 11's share of such cost is reduced by such amount. "AA-2" AGENDA ITEM #15 - DISTRICT 6 "AA-2" (3 of 4) Section 3: Nothing in this Resolution, or in any agreement or instrument executed pursuant hereto, shall relieve any Series C Participating District from any of the obligations under the Series C Acquisition Agreement (including without limitation its obligation to make installment payments thereunder) or the Series C Trust Agreement. Section The Chairman, Chairman pro lempore, Board Secretary and any other officer, official or member of the staff of the District is each authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents which they may deem necessary and advisable in order to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, and such actions previously taken by such officers are hereby ratified and confirmed. Section 5: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held September 14, 1994. "AA-3" AGENDA ITEM #15 - DISTRICT 6 "AA-3" (4 of 4) 1. The adjustments to the Series C Participating Districts' shares of the cost of the joint facilities included in the Series C Project are as follows: Amount Amount Attributed Attributed to Joint to Interest Project Expense Expenditure Total District No. 1 decreased by $ -0- $ -0- $ -0- District No. 2 decreased by 1,217,557 800,000 2,017,554 District No. 3 decreased by 1.483,183 1,000,000 2,483,183 District No. 6 decreased by 309,937 100,000 409,937 District No. 7 decreased by 332,048 400,000 732,048 District No. 11 increased by 3,332,722 2,300,000 5,632,722 2. The adjustments to the Current Participating Districts' share of the cost of the joint facilities included in the Current Project are as follows: District No. 1 increased by $ -0- District No. 2 increased by 2,017,554 District No. 3 increased by 2,483,183 District No. 6 increased by 409,937 District No. 7 increased by 732,048 District No. 11 decreased by 5,632,722 3. In each case described above, such adjustments will be further adjusted on a proportionate basis to take into account earnings on the $5,632,722. j:avroocvrracvNEYtEsosweuinenea "AA-4' AGENDA ITEM #15 - DISTRICT 6 "AA-4" COUNTY SANITATION _ DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 w OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON AUGUST 10, 1994 PNIiATlpA,G pRqIV n C J�y GE CO tl ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of Me Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,3,5, B, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on August 10, 1994,at 7:30 p.m.,in the Districts' Adminisvetive Offices. Followin0 the Pledge of A1180pgnda and invocation the roll was called and Me Secretary reported a quorum present far Districts Nos. 1.2. 3. S. 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: AC ALTERNATE ' DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Fred Banma,Chairman _ Gene Beyer James M.Ferryman,Chairman pro tam _ Nate Reads x Pat McGuigan _ TMmas E. Lure Roger Stanton _ W Iliam G.Steiner Tracy A.Watley _ Thomas R.Saltrappi DISTRICT NO.2: L John Copies.Chairman _ George Scott In Ross"Chairmen pre tam Tom Daly i Fred Banes Gene Beyer Buck Catlin Chris Norby Bany ONH$ Bob Bell Norman Z.Eckenrode Michael Meartrweiler William D.Memories JL James H.Flora Caney J.Nelson Glenn Parker Miguel Pelido JL Thomas E.LW a Roper Domain William G.Steiner Daniel T.Welch Jahn M.Gulliason George L.Zlaket Sheldon Stage, DISTRICT NO.3: _� Sal A.Sapien, Chairmen William C.Enrada _ Burns Dunlap. Chairman pro rem Caney J.Nelson George Brown Frank Laszlo Buck Catlin Chris Norby x John Collin George Scott James H.Flom William D.Mahoney Von R.Griffin Donald Bone Wags Unin Eva G.Miner i Thomas E.Lutr Pat McGuigan • Linda Mmi ton-Panmson Earle Robimille • Richard Partin Joyce C.Nicholson Iry Prckler Tom Daly Mania L.Rice James V.Evans .� Sheldon Singer George L.21alot Roper Stanton Wlliem G.Steiner g_ Charles Sylvia Archon SBlvaggl DISTRICT NO.5: x Fail Saesom,Chairman Jan permit ._ Willem G.Steiner,Chairman pro rem Roger Stamon John C.Co..Jr. Jan Debay DISTRICT NO.6: �� James A.Wa war,Chairman Anhui Perry • &alon Hart,Chaimlan pro rem John C.Co..Jr. • _ William G.Steiner Roger Stamen DISTRICT NO.7: g Barry Hammond.Chairman Mike Ward L Thomas R.Sidu ralb,Chairman pro rem Jim Pons Fred genera Gem Beyer Jan Debay Pail Sansone Ted Moreno Miguel Pulido a William G.Steimr Roper Station L James A.Waamr Mike Scheafer DISTRICT NO. 11: g� Grace Wimhell,Chairman Eade Determine Victor Leiprig,Chairman on,tam WMa Moulton-PaOerson a Roper Stanton _ Wlliam G.Steimr OISTRICT No. 13: L John M.Bushmen, Cashman _ Daniel T.Welch a Glenn Porker.Chairman pro tern _ Burnie Dunlop 'w Fred Barren _ Gene Beyer x Iry Fickler _ Tom Del, William G.Steiner Roper Stanton DISTRICT NO.14: i Pser A.Swan,Chairman Darryl Miller Barry Neoprene.Chairman pro tam Mike Word Fred Be.. Gene Beyer Jim Potts Tracy A.Worley a Wiliam G.Steimr Raper Stanton .2. O8/10/94 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Gary G. Streed, Corinne Berenson, Catherine Biele, Mike Broyles, Mark Campbell, P.M. Carnahan, Chris Cervellone, Brandon Chavez, Rick Chavez, Don Crapnell, Glen Davidson, Bernie DeAnda, Scott Engstrom, John Finias, John Gonzalez, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Jane Kaye, Mark Legg, John Linder, Pat McNally, Mike Moore, Charles Egigian-Nichols, Karl Nordgren, Bob Oaten, William Pierce, Alan Ralph, Ellen Ray, Rory Rea, Curt Shelp, Ed Torres, Chuck Winsor, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Richard Bailey, David L. Hamilton, Michael Klein, Mary Lee, R. Craig Scott, Larry Siegel, Phil Stone DISTRICT 6 This 10th day of August, 1994, at 7:30 p.m., Adjournment of meeting due to being the time and place for the Regular lack of quorum Meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, and there not being a quorum present in District No. 6, the meeting of said District was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary. DISTRICT 3 In the absence of Chairman Sal A. Sapien and Appointment of Chairman oro tern Chairman pro tem Burnie Dunlap, Director James H. Flora was appointed Chairman pro tem of District No. 3. DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 5. 7. 11, 13 & 14 The Joint Chairman recognized David Hamilton, Recognition of persons who wish to be business agent fqr the IUOE Local 501 Operating heard on matters of general interest Engineers, who addressed the Boards in regard to issues pertaining to the current meet and confer process for a Memorandum of Understanding with the Operations and Maintenance Employee Unit. DISTRICTS 1 . 2. 3. 5. 7. 11, 13 & 14 The Joint Chairman announced that the Districts Report of Joint Chairman had been selected to receive the US Environmental Protection Agency's 1994 Second Place National Pretreatment Program Excellence Award. He stated that it was a significant accomplishment. The factors contributing to the Districts' receipt of this award were: an automated permitting system that implements both concentration and mass-based discharge limits, legal authority embodied in the ordinance, a computerized management system that allows identification and tracking of each permittee's obligations, an inspection and sampling program and QA/QC procedures, a self-monitoring program that utilizes computer automation to effectively administer this program, enforcement procedures that are embodied in the enforcement management system, a pollution prevention program that -3- 08/10/94 manages waste generation at the source and reduces toxics before release by permittess and a public outreach program. Chairman Cox and the Directors then commended the Source Control Division for their industrial waste program achievements. The Joint Chairman then announced the tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: i District 2 Selection Committee- Tuesday, August 16th, at 9:00 a.m. District 3 Selection Committee - Wednesday, August 17th, at 7:30 a.m. Special Selection Committee re Computers - Wednesday, August 17th, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Subcommittee- Wednesday, August 24th, at 5:30 p.m. Joint Works Selection Committee- Thursday, August 25th, at 4:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Thursday, August 25th, at 5:30 p.m. The Joint Chairman observed that the Executive Committee normally did not meet in the month of August. However, he stated there were several issues that needed to be considered by the Committee. He also stated that, based on input from Directors, he was developing a recommendation for restructuring the Boards' committees that he would be submitting to the Executive Committee so that implementation could begin as soon as possible. The restructuring would provide for improved participation by Board Members. In response to Directors' questions regarding attendance at the Executive Committee meetings in the absence of a District Chair, it was explained that although the Boards' Rules of Procedure do not specifically provide for it, if the Chair of a District is unable to attend, the Chair pro tem may attend in their place. DISTRICTS 1 , 2. 3. 5. 7. 11, 13 & 14 The General Manager reported that an Report of the General Manager Executive Summary of the 1993 Annual Report was placed in the Directors' meeting folders. He stated that the Annual Report is filed each year with federal and state regulators as a condition of the Districts' NPDES ocean discharge permit. He referred the Directors to Page 3 of the Executive Summary, and noted that the graph depicts constituents allowed to be discharged into the ocean under the Districts' permit, and the actual amounts being discharged by the Districts', which are well below the permit limits. He also referred the Directors to the graph on Page 4. The graph depicts the amount of heavy metals in the influent coming into the plants, which reflects a reduction by over 80% since 1977. The treated effluent discharge has been reduced by 88%. Mr. Sylvester stated that these major reductions have occurred even though the flows have increased by as much as 50% over the same period of time. Both of these accomplishments are due largely to the success of the Districts' aggressive source control program. Mr. Sylvester commented that July had marked the completion of 40 years of service by the Districts to the community. The Districts' public information video, recently updated, was then viewed by the Directors. In response to Directors' questions, they were advised that -4- O8/10/94 copies of the video were available for their local community cable systems and arrangements could be made by contacting Corinne Berenson, Public Information Officer. The General Manager observed that the video showed that the Districts recycle 100% of r their biosolids, the residual of the sewage treatment process, which is then used as a soil s amendment. Current biosolids production is approximately 525 wet tons per day, 365 days per year. He referred the Directors to a summary that was included in their agenda ' packages pertaining to some issues that have recently developed at a site in Thermal, California, where the Districts, along with several other POTWs, process biosolids. These issues are continuing and articles have appeared in the press. He then introduced the Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Manager, Charles Egigian-Nichols, to update the Directors on this matter. Mr. Egigian-Nichols reported one of the Districts' biosolids contractor, Pima Gro Systems, trucks biosolids to the Torres-Martinez Indian Reservation in Thermal, California. Some of the local citizens oppose biosolids processing at this site and have coordinated efforts with an environmental organization and others to protest operations at the site. The reason for this opposition is largely due to a pile of approximately 470,000 tons of biosolids left at the Torres-Martinez Indian Reservation composting site by a contractor for another POTW, Chino-Corona Farms, who is no longer in business. None of the biosolids in that pile came from the Districts. It was further reported that the Regional Water Quality Control Board is investigating whether shallow groundwater contamination from trace metals exists, and also the possibility of blowing dust. In response to the complaints, the parties (POTWs, regulators and biosolids contractors) are working diligently to ensure that no environmental degradation occurs at the site because of biosolids composting operations. Mr. Egigian-Nichols further reported that as part of the good faith effort that is under way, the parties have hired a geohydrologist. It was then determined that the groundwater monitoring wells, installed initially for the project several years ago, were not well maintained for sampling. The geohydrologist rehabilitated these wells. Sampling done in February and March of this year found that there were some elevated levels of metals concentrations in five of the wells, but these metal levels were not due to biosolids or compost operations at the site. It was discovered that fine sand had entered the wells through the well casing, ending up in the water samples. The water samples are stored in an acidified container. The acid leeches out metals from the sand and contaminates the sample. In response to that, intensive drilling of new wells has been completed to prevent sand interference. Further noted, however, was that groundwater sampling had yet to be conducted because of jurisdictional issues which the US EPA, the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) are trying to resolve. There is also a split within the Torres- Martinez Indian Reservation. Geraldine Ibanez, a tribe member and "allottee" of the land on a which the composting is being performed, asserts that she is operating within her legal rights to contract with firms doing the composting. Others disagree. The BIA has temporarily provided authority to operate to the contractors. -5- 08/1 0/94 Mr. Egigian-Nichols concluded that all parties, except those opposed to biosolids, are working in good faith to resolve any environmental concerns, and that there be no environmental impairment at the site. Until the ongoing water quality monitoring program has been completed to show the true nature of any groundwater under the site and any cause-and-effect relationship, it is premature to draw any definitive conclusions. These parties are also working to remove the large pile of biosolids from San Diego that has been left there by Chino-Corona Farms. Mr. Egigian-Nichols also stated that the Districts' biosolids meet all State and Federal standards and requirements for safe and reliable recycling, are of exceptional quality as defined by US EPA, that none of the Districts' biosolids are in this large storage pile and that our contractor, Pima Gro, is continuing to operate in a safe and legal manner. Mr. Egigian- Nichols then briefly reviewed the available options for disposal of the biosolids should the site in Thermal close. DISTRICTS 1 . 2. 3. 5. 7. 11, 13 & 14 The General Counsel referred Directors to a Report of General Counsel memorandum included in their meeting folders that evening. The memorandum is for information only regarding earthquake insurance coverage. Directors had posed questions about relying on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to assist with funds in the event of a major catastrophe that could affect the treatment plants. According to the law, the Districts are not required as a precondition to have insurance. However, if the Districts have to make a claim through FEMA, a second claim would not be able to be made unless the Districts could clearly show that every reasonable effort was made to place insurance coverage. Mr. Woodruff also updated the Directors on an incident occurring in 1991 in La Habra where petroleum was discharged into the sewer lines, through a gas station owned by United Oil, that required major emergency response from the Districts, the City's Fire Department and City staff. The Boards authorized a $121,000.00settlement with United Oil to recover $125,000.00 in Districts' costs, of which $53,000.00 was to be paid immediately. The balance of $68,000 was contingent upon obtaining recovery through the state emergency fund. However, should United Oil fail to obtain the funds, the Districts reserved the right to hold United Oil responsible for paying the balance. Mr. Woodruff indicated that a check was to be delivered to his office the following day for the remaining amount of $68,000.00, thereby collecting 100% of the settlement amount. The General Counsel then referred Directors to a memorandum mailed to them under separate cover regarding three matters of litigation. One of those matters was concerning the Santa Ana River widening project, wherein the Districts were named in lawsuits by several property owners in Costa Mesa and Huntington Beach for major structural damage. The Districts tendered defense to the insurance carriers of the contractor responsible for the river widening work who had contracted with the County EMA and Corps of Engineers. The s insurance carriers initially refused to pick up the defense until approximately six months ago. They have now agreed and paid for all legal expenses incurred by the Districts for these lawsuits and the Districts have been dropped from the suits. -6- 08/10/94 DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to Aooroval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1994,the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held ` July 13, 1994,the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1994,the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1994,the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1994,the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1994,the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1994,the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held July 13, 1994,the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICTS 1 2 3 S. 7. 11 , 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A", "B" and "C" t attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. , -7- 08/10/94 07/13/94 07/27/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 697,827.92 $ 967,606.65 s Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,588,870.17 651 ,635.39 Joint Working Capital Fund - 195,793.06 199,052.36 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 27,604.74 46,026.65 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 764.62 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 10,334.97 94.53 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 39,564.00 18,691.63 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 188,698.39 93,591.72 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 10,005.70 7,485.85 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 11 ,747.41 515,506.31 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 34.11 0.00 DISTRICT N0. 14 - 7,238.65 1,274,434.42 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 46,671 .47 4,688.58 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,873.21 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT 4,892.51 12.85 52.832.940.93 S3.778.826.94 DISTRICTS 1 . 2. 3. 5. 7. 11 , 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Purchase of Anionic Polvelectrolvte Chemical Polymer. That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Specification No. C-032,to Neutron Resolution No. 94-90, receiving and filing bid Products. Inc. tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Anionic Polyelectrolyte Chemical Polymer, Specification No. C-032,to Neutron Products, Inc. for the price of $1.70 per pound, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning September 1, 1994, with provision for four one-year extensions (estimated annual cost $228,022.70 plus sales tax). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 5. 7. 11, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and No. P2-42-2 specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, authorizing a net deduction of $7,413.00 from the contract with Margate Construction for six items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 153 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -8- O8/10/94 DISTRICTS 1 . 2, 3. 5. 7. 11 , 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chanae Order No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 5 to the plans and No. P2-53-1 specifications for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, + Job No. P2-53-1,authorizing a net addition of $9,070.00 to the contract with Amelco Construction, a Division of Amelco Industries, for four items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 14 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 5. 7, 11, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizina the Selection Committee to solicit Proposals and negotiate a That the Selection Committee be, and is Professional Services Agreement for hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and Job No. J-25-2 negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for Phase I Power System Studies at Plant Nos. 1 and 2, Job No. J-25-2. DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 5. 7. 11, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is Professional Services Agreement with hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum Black & Veatch re Job No. P7-46 No. i to the Professional Services Agreement and Job No. P2-55 with Black & Veatch for engineering evaluation and design and construction support services required for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-55, providing for additional engineering design services pertaining to chemical feed facilities modifications. DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 5. 7. 11 , 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 64272 That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue issued to AtmAA. Inc. Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 64272 issued to AtmAA, Inc., for performing analyses of air samples for an additional amount not to exceed $42,000.00,for additional testing as identified by staff relative to Phase II Biofiltration Demonstration Project approved by the Boards on July 13, 1994, increasing the total authorized amount from an amount not to exceed $66,OOO.00to an amount not to exceed $108,000.00. DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 7 11 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and deny claim of Unicare Insurance Company re Job No P2-49 That the claim of Unicare Insurance Company dated July 8, 1994, in the estimated amount of $1 ,OOO,OOO.00for money paid to or on behalf of Robin Miller, Joseph Patterson and Richard Holm in connection with construction of Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, , FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the Districts' General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. -9- 08/10/94 DISTRICTS 1 , 2, 3. 5. 7, 11 , 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing settlement of Workers' Compensation claim for employee Ruben That the settlement of Workers' Compensation Perez claim for employee Ruben Perez in the amount of $14,601.00,be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 1 , 2. 3. 5, 7. 11 , 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20. as That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt amended, deleting one position and Resolution No. 94-91 , amending Classification addino one Position in the Planning and and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as Design Division of Engineering amended, deleting one vacant Engineering Department Aide II ($2651-$3301)position and adding one Environmental Specialist [ ($266943324)in the Planning and Design Division of Engineering Department. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1 . 2, 3. 5, 7, 11, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing membership in the Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA) That membership in the Santa Ana River Flood for the 1994-95 fiscal year Protection Agency (SARFPA) for the 1994-95 fiscal year, be, and is hereby, approved (estimated annual dues $1 ,100.00). DISTRICTS 1 . 2. 3. 5. 7. 11 , 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Subcommittee That the draft minutes of the Executive Subcommittee meetings held on June 23, July 21 and July 26, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1 . 2. 3. 5, 7. 11 , 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the draft minutes of the Fiscal Policy Committee meeting held on July 20, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICTS 1 , 2. 3, 5. 7, 11 , 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Committee That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on July 27, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -10- O8/10/94 DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5 7 11, 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving request of the State of California Environmental Protection That the request of the State of California Aaencv. Department of Toxic Substances Environmental Protection Agency, Department ` Control re wastewater discharged from of Toxic Substances Control, that the Boards' Strinafellow waste disposal site and Job requirement that the Santa Ana River No. P7-38-2 Interceptor flows carrying pretreated wastewater discharged from the Stringfellow waste disposal site be diverted from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2 for treatment, be temporarily suspended to allow treatment at Plant No. 1 during construction modifications being performed at the Plant No. 1 Influent Wastewater Diversion Structure pursuant to Job No. P1-38-2, Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, be, and is hereby approved. DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 5. 7. 11 , 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 65384 That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue issued to Public Financial Management Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order No. 65384 issued to Public Financial Management, extending their transitional financial advisory services to September 30, 1994, at no increase in the maximum authorized compensation of $50,000.00. DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 7 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoorovino Adiustment of Shares of Various Districts of the Cost of Certain That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the Improvements to Joint Facilities following resolutions approving Adjustment of Pertaining to 1990-92 Series "C" Shares of Various Districts of the Cost of Certificates of Participation Certain Improvements to Joint Facilities Pertaining to 1990-92 Series "C" Certificates of Participation: DISTRI T RESOLUTION NO. 1 94-92-1 2 94-93-2 3 94-94-3 7 94-96-7 11 94-97-1 1 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 1 2. 3. 5. 7. 11 , 13 & 14 The Joint Chairman introduced Larry Siegel and Review of Districts' Capital Projects Michael Klein of Ernst & Young to report to the Management Function by Ernst & Young Directors on their review of the Capital Projects Management Function. It was noted that the Directors' agenda material contained the full report and recommendations of Ernst & Young - and the reports and recommendations of the Executive Subcommittee and the Executive Committee and, thus, the presentation would be a brief summary. -11- O8/10/94 Using overhead slides, Mr. Siegel and Mr. Klein gave a presentation of their review of the Districts' Capital Projects Management Function. The Phase 1 study of the five previously identified construction projects (Wastehauler Station, Ocean Outfall Booster Station Controls, Odor Control Domes, Central Power Generation Engines and Computerized Monitoring System) focused on five major processes within the capital project management function: project selection; design procurement; design management; construction procurement; and, construction management, to determine if there were systemic issues that needed to be addressed. The Phase 1 work resulted in sixteen recommendations,five of which were determined to be priority items which staff has already begun implementing. Also recommended is Phase 2 to create an improvement team of Ernst & Young staff and Districts' staff to address and implement the Phase 1 recommendations. Phase 2 also includes a study of the Operations and Maintenance Functions. A Phase 3 work plan has also been identified for consideration by the Directors. Aoorovino Ernst & Young's Moved, seconded and duly carried: recommendations and authorizing staff to implement Priority Items 1 . That the sixteen recommendations of the Ernst 4. 6. 8 and 11 & Young review of the Capital Projects Management Process, be, and are hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to proceed immediately with implementation of the priority items identified by Ernst & Young as Items 1, 4, 6, 8 and 11. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: Professional Services Agreement with Ernst & Young for review of That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Districts' Capital Proiects Resolution No. 94-98,approving Addendum Management Function No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ernst & Young to conduct a two-phase independent review of the Districts' Capital Projects Management Function, including current Districts' organizational structure and management practices, providing for addition of the Phase 2 Review of the Districts' Capital Projects Management Function for an amount not to exceed $105,000.00,and to conduct an Evaluation of Operations and Maintenance Functions, set forth as Item 1 in the Ernst & Young Phase 3 recommendations, for a total amount not to exceed $45,000.00,increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $85,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $235,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -12- 08/10/94 Authorizing the Executive Moved, seconded and duly carried: Subcommittee and the Executive Committee to review Phase 3 That the Executive Subcommittee be, and is Work Plan with Ernst & Youno and hereby, authorized to review the Phase 3 Work staff and to submit Plan with Ernst & Young and staff after the recommendations early Phase 2 work; and, FURTHER MOVED: That following that review, the Executive Subcommittee be, and is hereby, directed to submit a recommendation on Phase 3 to the Executive Committee at its regular meeting on September 28, 1994; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Executive Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to submit a recommendation to the Joint Boards for consideration at their regular meeting on October 12, 1994. DISTRICTS 1. 2, 3. 5. 7. 11, 13 & 14 Actions re Capital Facilities Connection Charge Ordinances Approving, in concept, a policy of Following a clarification by staff of the assessing an excess capacity applicability of the proposed policy pertaining charge for any government to assessing excess capacity charges to agency's water treatment facility government agencies water treatment facilities connected to the Districts' in response to a question by Director sewerage system McGuigan, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That a policy of assessing an excess capacity charge for any government agency's water treatment facility which is connected to the Districts' sewerage system, be, and is hereby, approved in concept. Approving, in concept, a policy Moved, seconded and duly carried: wherein fees collected as excess capacity charges from a That a policy wherein fees collected as excess governmental agency for the capacity charges from a governmental agency connection of a water treatment for the connection of a water treatment facility facility to the Districts' sewerage to the Districts' sewerage system are to be system are to be held in reserve held in reserve in accordance with a proposed designated for future appropriation Boards' policy that designates the revenues related to the construction of a received for future appropriation related to the brine line, subject to appropriate construction of a brine line for separate approvals discharge to the ocean through the Districts' outfall system, if all regulatory permit approvals are received, or, upon failure to receive said approvals, the funds may be expended in the same manner as other connection fees collected for any Districts' capital facilities project, be, and is hereby, approved in concept. - Directors Buck Catlin, Don Griffin and Phil Sansone requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. -13- O8/10/94 Authorizing staff and General Moved, seconded and duly carried: Counsel to draft proposed amendments to the Districts' That staff and General Counsel be, and are Capital Facilities Connection hereby, authorized and directed to draft Charge Ordinance proposed amendments to the Districts' Capital Facilities Connection Charge Ordinance to - implement said policies pertaining to excess capacity charges for government agency water treatment facilities for consideration by the Executive Committee and Boards of Directors at future meetings. DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 5 7. 11 , 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to study the existing Capital Facilities Connection Fee That staff be, and is hereby, authorized and Ordinance provisions to determine directed to study the existing Capital Facilities enuitability of fees, and to draft Connection Fee Ordinance provisions to appropriate changes to the Ordinances determine equitability of fees, and to draft for future consideration: and authorizing appropriate changes to the Ordinances for the Selection Committee to solicit future consideration by the Boards; and, consulting proposals to assist in said study FURTHER MOVED: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit consulting proposals to assist in said study, for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. DISTRICTS 1. 2. 3. 5. 7. 11 , 13 & 14 Actions relative to Preparation of Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection. Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan re Job No. J-34-1 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering referred the Directors to the Staff Report included in their agenda package, which includes a photograph depicting the existing and future surge towers which are the subject of the proposed EIR supplement pertaining to Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1. He reported the environmental impact report included in the 1989 Master Plan described projects to be constructed over the next 30 years. One of the projects is the addition of a new ocean outfall with an additional surge tower located next to the existing 120" outfall surge tower. The towers were to be the same height of 89 feet. Studies this year have confirmed the need for this second surge tower as the existing ocean outfall will begin to exceed its capacity around the turn of the century. The existing surge tower and 120" outfall have a capacity of 480 million gallons per day. The need for a second outfall, by upsizing and extending the existing 78" outfall, has been confirmed. However, recent investigations have found fractures of the Newport/Inglewood fault underlying the existing surge tower, and because of these seismic conditions, staff is now recommending a different location as shown in the -14- 08/10/94 photograph. This tower will be approximately 400 feet closer to Pacific Coast Highway, as well as about 30 feet taller than the existing Surge Tower No. 1. Because of the changes, Mr. Anderson stated that a focused Supplemental EIR is required under the California Environmental Quality Act. The cost for this study should be less than $20,000.00. In response to questions posed by Directors regarding the failure of the San Diego outfall a few years ago, Mr. Anderson stated they did not have a surge tower on their outfall such as the Districts have on theirs. The hydraulic conditions were different, thus the probable reason for San Diego's failure. Mr. Anderson also reported on available options that were studied. One of the options was to try and strengthen the existing surge tower and raise it in place next to Surge Tower No. 2. However, having the towers separated by 400 feet would improve the chances of one remaining intact in the event of an earthquake, and improving our reliability and long-term ability to discharge treated effluent safely into the ocean. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: dated July 19, 1994 That the Staff Report dated July 19, 1994 re Supplement No. 3 to the Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Initial Study and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Environmental Impact Assessment re Job No. J-34-1 That the Initial Study and Environmental Impact Assessment relative to construction of Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34-1 , finding that said project could have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, an Environmental Impact Report will be required, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizing preparation of Draft Moved, seconded and duly carried: Supplement No. 3 to the Program EIR for the 1989 Collection. That the Boards of Directors hereby authorize Treatment and Disposal Facilities preparation of Draft Supplement No. 3 to the Master Plan Program Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan and circulation for public review in compliance with CEQA requirements. DISTRICTS 1 _ 2. 3. 5, 7. 11 , 13 & 14 General Counsel reported to the Directors the General Counsel's Comments Prior to need for a closed session as authorized by Closed Session Government Code Section 54956.9, 54957 and 54957.6 to discuss and consider the items - that are specified as Item 14(b)(1), (2), (3), (4) and (5) on the published Agenda. 15- 08/10/94 DISTRICTS 1 , 2. 3. 5, 7. 11 , 13 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9. The Boards convened in closed session at 54957 and 54957.6 8:54 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9,54957 and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of actions taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re: Agenda Item (14)(b)(3). No actions were taken re Agenda Items (14)(b)(1). (2), (4) and (5). ALL DISTRICTS At 9:30 p.m. the Boards reconvened in regular Reconvene in regular session session. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:30 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the finance department to write off as uncollectible the account of That the finance department be, and is hereby, S & B Plating and Metal Finishing authorized to write off as uncollectible the Company. Industrial Waste Discharge account of S & B Plating and Metal Finishing Permit No. 2-1-671 Company, Industrial Waste Discharge Permit No. 2-1-671, in the amount of $67,770.83. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request for annexation and authorizing initiation of proceedings That the request from Dean and Coco Ambler re pr000sed Annexation No. 74 - EMC Keller for the annexation of 0.811 acres of Mortgage Annexation territory to the District, in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of Old Ranch Road and Country Hill Road in the City of Anaheim, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-99-2, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 74- EMC Mortgage Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of Selection Committee That the draft minutes of the Selection Committee meetings held on July 19, 1994 and August 2, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -16- O8/10/94 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. That the Selection Committee certification of for preparation of plans and specifications the final negotiated fee relative to the re Contract No. 2-34R Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. for preparation of plans and specifications for Repair and Rehabilitation of Manholes on Euclid Trunk Sewer, Talbert Avenue to Orangethorpe Avenue, Contract No. 2-34R, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-100-2, approving said agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, direct expenses and profit, for a total amount not to exceed $155,290.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:30 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:30 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:30 p.m. - DISTRICT 7 Actions re Abandonment of Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main. and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer. Contract No 7-20 Approving Change Order No 1 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-20 That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of $56,293.77to the contract with Peter C. David Co., Inc., for 12 items of additional or deleted work, and granting a time extension of five calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -17- 08/10/94 Approving Change Order No. 2 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-20 That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total net deduction of $11 ,220.64from the contract with Peter C. David Co., Inc., be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Contract No. 7-20 Moved, seconded and duly carried: as complete That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-102-7,accepting Abandonment of Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request for annexation and authorizing initiation of proceedings That the request from Gary and Cheryl Turner re proposed Annexation No. 150 - Turner for annexation of 1 .54 acres of territory to the Annexation District, in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of Amapola Avenue and Ranchwood Trail in unincorporated county territory, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-103-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 150 - Turner Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:30 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:30 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:30 p.m. -18- ofino194 DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adioumment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Assistant Secr y 6,f tffi Boards of Directors Of County Sani ion ricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -19- FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/07M PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OIIIY94 POSTING DATE 07/13194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 138679 ASPER PUBLICATION $132.00 PUBLICATION 138680 ASR ANALYSIS $523.17 ENGINE TESTING 138681 ABRASIVE ENG.TOOL&EQUIP $270.00 PAINT SUPPLIES 138682 ACCESS DATA $145.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1386B3 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $436.899.55 CONSTRUCTION PL36-i 138684 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $198.16 LAB SUPPLIES 138685 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS,INC. $35.576.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9.89 138666 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO.LTD $8,174.99 MANHOLE COVERS 138687 ALTA-ROBBINS $245.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135688 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $24,000.00 CONSTRUCTION P2.52-1 138689 AMERICAN HI-LIFT $80.580.84 PLATFORM M.O.3/9194 136690 AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTION $88,60 LAB SUPPLIES 138691 CITY OF ANAHEIM E1,65O00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING 138692 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS E487SO LAB SUPPLIES 138693 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $939.15 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT nl 138694 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $330.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT x = 1386% AP L IE SYSTEMS E1 312.50 NOTICES&ADS w 138696 APPLIEDBIOSCIRIES .312.60 LAB SUPPLIES 138698 ABC QUATIC CENTER E1,$40.00 LAB SERVICES —1 135695 ASSOCIATE CON 174.50 AIR BOTTLES D 138700 AWARDS&TROPHIES CONCRETE PRODUCTS ES49.56 BUILDING MATERIALS 1 138101 AWARDS&TROPHIES 349.01 PLAQUES N 138702 BKK LANDFILL E2,$81.01 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9-91 138703 BRW SAFETY 8SUPPLY 367.31 PRINT SUPPLIES 138704 BANANA S LAW UB E2,430.00 PRINTING M.O.10-1490 138705 BATTERES LAW PUBLISHERS $178.76 PUBLICATION 138706 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 5178.76 BATTERIES 138707 BAUERCOMPRESTIC 3546.0 COMPRESSOR PARTS 135708 SMTER SEDIAGNOSTICS,INC. $1.135.00 LAB SUPPLIES 138]OB BELL SECURITY St,135.00 SECURITY SERVICES 138709 BIO TECH NET,INC. $12.90 SERVICE AGREEMENT 138710 BLACK 8 VEATCH 529,047.73 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-25-1 138711 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4.832.59 EQUIPMENT LEASE 138712 BOERINGER MANNHEIM $1.042.40 LAB SUPPLIES 138713 SOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 5560.30 TRUCK REPAIRS 138714 BON-A-RUES $55.75 TRUCK PARTS 138715 BOOT BARN $199.13 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 136716 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $916.09 PUBLICATION 138717 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. E1,598.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS 138718 BUY-CHEM DISTRIBUTORS $631.95 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 138719 CEM CORPORATION $282.74 LAB SUPPUES 136720 C.P.A. $1.549.91 LAB SUPPLIES 130721 CRC PRESS,INC. $1,256.26 LAB SUPPLIES 138722 CS COMPANY $2.161.70 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 138723 GALTROL,INC. $2.519.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 138724 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. E344.86 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7107194 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07113194 POSTING DATE 01113M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 138725 CALIFORNIA SUPPRESSION SYSTEM $589.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 138726 CAPITAL WESTWARD $484.62 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136727 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $13,503.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38 138728 CENTON ELECTRONICS,INC. $694.77 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 13B729 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $036.80 OFFICE FURNITURE 138730 CENTURY PAINT $593.95 PAINT SUPPLIES 138731 CENTURY SAFETY INST.B SUPPLY $1,838.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES 138732 FIBERGRATEICHEMWEST 82,483.42 PUMP PARTS 138733 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $00.00 PUMP PARTS 138734 COASTALMOTION $1,584.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES 138735 COUCH 8 SONS $43,519.63 CONSTRUCTION 5.374 138736 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $24,567.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 138737 COMPUSA,INC. $1,218.30 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 138738 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3.483.04 ELECTRIC PARTS m 138739 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $287.22 FREIGHT 138740 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $4.489.32 TOOLS x 138741 CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY $114.05 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 138742 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C 67,444.27 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8.11.93 138743 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. B412.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS 138744 CITY OF COSTA MESA $3,630.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING D 138745 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $17.24 ELECTRIC PARTS I 138746 CHARLES P.CROWLEY CO. $82.35 PUMP PARTS N 138747 CALIF.INTEGRATED WASTE $540.00 PUBLICATION 138748 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $46.900.00 1993.94 SALES TAX LIABILITY 130749 DAPPER TIRE $1,187.49 TIRES 138750 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.00 RENTAL EOUIPMENT 138751 MARCEL DEKKER,INC. $128.70 PUBLICATION 138752 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $6,214.29 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-11-93 138753 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $820.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 138754 DRESSER MEASUREMENT $31.57 SALES TAX 138755 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $12,342.97 PERSONNEL INSURANCE CONSULTANT 138756 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $332.43 PAINT SUPPLIES 136757 D'VALS SALES $196.82 FITTINGS 138758 ESP NORTH $101.24 HARDWARE 138759 EASTMAN.INC. $2,542,09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 138760 ELECTRONIC MICROSYSTEMS.INC. $184.10 TELEPHONE PARTS 138761 ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHING 3430.00 SUBSCRIPTION 138762 ENCHANTER,INC. $3,920.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-/0-92 136763 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL SERVICE $35.00 LAB SERVICES 136784 MARSHALL FAIRRES $78.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 138765 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $23.775.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 130766 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $269.53 AIR FREIGHT 130767 FIRST COMPANY $156.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 138768 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $820.64 INSTRUMENT PARTS 138769 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $338.03 LAB SUPPLIES 138770 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $25.624.44 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7107194 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0711394 POSTING DATE 07I1394 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 138771 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $315.05 PHOTO SUPPLIES 138772 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $1,247.75 LAB SUPPLIES 136773 GST,INC. $4.331.07 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 138774 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $761.76 LUMBER/WARDWARE 136775 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $1.847.52 ELECTRIC PARTS 138776 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1.032.19 TELEPHONE SERVICES 138777 GENIE SCIENTIFIC,INC. $150.00 LAB SUPPLIES 138778 LIFE TECHNOLOGIESIGIBCO $198.17 LAB SUPPLIES 138779 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $231.01 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 138780 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $479.45 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 138781 GRASSYS.T.I. $8.499.73 ENGINE PARTS 138782 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $7.118.23 PRINTING 138703 VGA CONSULTANTS 82,970.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-0-94 138704 HE TYPE 8 GRAPHICS $71.12 PRINTING f*1 138705 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $919.72 TRUCK PARTS X 138786 FREDA.HARPER $1.500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION Z 138787 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1.263.28 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 138788 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $5.811.10 TRUCK PARTS 138789 HAUTAWAY CONTAINERS $1,100.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 138790 PL HAWN CO,INC. $203.52 FILTER n 138791 EG HELLER'S SON,INC. $34.55 MACHINE PARTS 138792 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $205.58 COMPRESSOR PARTS W 138793 HOME DEPOT $287.07 HARDWARE 130794 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.139.35 PAINT SUPPLIES 138795 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 913,153.50 WATER USE 138796 HYDRACON COMPANY $60.20 LAB SUPPLIES 138797 HYDROTEX,INC. $3.410.68 LURE OIL 138798 IDEXX $95.75 LAB SUPPLIES 138799 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $95,825.95 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11.18.92 138800 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 6624.04 CONNECTORS 138801 INGRAM PAPER $174.56 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 138802 INORGANIC VENTURES $359.09 LAB SUPPLIES 138803 INTERNATIONAL EQUIPMENT CO. $122.80 LAB SUPPLIES 138804 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $5.58 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 138805 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $112.05 WATER USE 138808 JAMISON ENGINEERING $3,727.70 PUMP STATION REPAIRS DIST5 138807 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1,291.36 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 138808 JAVID CONTRACTORS,INC. $130,746.01 CONSTRUCTION P2-23-511 138809 JAY'S CATERING $323.58 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 138810 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $623.25 ELECTRIC PARTS 138811 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO $29.86 HARDWARE 138812 KING BEARING,INC. $019.30 MACHINE SUPPLIES 138813 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $7,620.52 TOOLS 138814 L 8 C TIRE SERVICE $719.77 TRUCK PARTS 138815 LCD POWER SYSTEMS $1.100.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 138816 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $714.37 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/07194 PAGE04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07113/94 POSTING DATE 07/13/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 139817 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $125.31 CHEMICALS 138818 LASHER AUTO CENTER $14,966.69 VEHICLE 13B819 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L.LAVOIE $124.46 LEGAL SERVICES-NITZEN 138820 LEGI-TECH $320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 138821 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGR. $23.462.49 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-40.1 138822 LEWCO ELECTRIC $79.83 TRUCK PARTS 138823 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $5,809.78 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIRONMENTAL 138824 LOCALAGENCY 9500.00 MITCHELL ANNEXATION 138825 LUCAS WESTERN $3.000.00 ECSA REFUND 135826 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $86.27 LAB SUPPLIES 138827 MPS $1,396.83 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 138828 MACOMCO $520.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT 138829 MANLEYS BOILER REPAIR CO. $325.09 BOILER REPAIRS 138830 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. 5472,338.00 CONSTRUCTION P2.02-2 rn 138831 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $34.51 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES X 138832 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $360.80 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 2 138833 MC-DRAW HILL,INC. $377.13 PUBLICATION 138834 BEN MEADOWS ENVIRONMENTAL $308.39 LAB SUPPLIES 138035 MERLIN CONTROLS CO. $451.90 GAUGE -1 138836 WILLIAM M.MERCER,INC. $80.81 PUBLICATION D 138831 MIDLAND MFG.CORP. $40.60 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES I 138838 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $10,105,85 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 135839 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO $233.07 INSTRUMENT PARTS 138840 MISSION INDUSTRIES 53.207.87 UNIFORM RENTALS 138841 MONITOR LABS $2,710,24 INSTRUMENT PARTS 138842 PAUL MONROE $378.60 ENGINE PARTS 138843 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $956.37 SAFETY SUPPLIES 138844 STANDARD REF.MATL.PROGRAM S965.00 LAB SUPPLIES 136845 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $447.83 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 138946 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $182.74 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 138847 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $55.67 WATER USE 138848 CUONG NGUYEN $5,000.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 138849 NUTECH CORPORATION $153.37 LAB SUPPLIES 138850 OI CORPORATION $440.27 LAB SUPPLIES 138851 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $143.47 TRUCK PARTS 13BB52 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL $1,920.04 CHEMICALS 136853 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,786.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 138854 ORANGE COURIER $133.65 COURIER SERVICES 133855 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $3.017.10 FITTINGS 138855 OSCARS LOCK&SAFE $90.51 KEYS 138857 COUNTY OF ORANGE $17.232.41 SERVICE AGREEMENT 138858 COUNTY.OF ORANGE $2.305.00 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 138859 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $11.708.28 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 138860 PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH LABS $390.00 LAB SUPPLIES 138861 PACIFIC PARTS $166.77 INSTRUMENT PARTS 138862 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $812.49 SAFETY SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7107194 PAGE 05 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07113M POSTING DATE O7113194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 138863 PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $278.26 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 138864 PAN VERA CORP. $290,00 LAB SUPPLIES 130865 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 138866 PASCAL B LUDWIG.INC. 5181.618A0 CONSTRUCTION PI-38.2 138867 PASCAL 8 LUDWIG $105,543.00 CONSTRUCTION P243-1 138B6B R.F.PAULUS,INC. $4,362,58 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 138869 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $2,494.50 LAB SUPPLIES 138870 PERM SEAL 82,048.08 OIL 138871 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $325.894.38 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.68-91 136872 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE 827.80 HARDWARE 138873 POLYPURE,INC. $15.478.38 CATIONIC POLYMER MO 3.11-92 138874 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $54.00 ICE 130875 MIKE PRLICH 6 SONS $184.197.55 CONSTRUCTION 5-35-2 138676 PROFESSIONAL TREE CARE $8,750.OD LANDSCAPING SERVICES Rl 138877 QUEST MEDIA B SUPPLIES $2.354.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS X 138878 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $135.87 LAB SUPPLIES 2 139879 RED WING SHOES $201.71 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 138880 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $5.044.50 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 138681 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT.CORP. $777.41 LAB SUPPLIES —1 138882 ROYCE PRODUCTIONS $9.550.00 PUBLIC INFORMATION VIDEO 13B8B3 RYAN-NERCO $486.78 METAL nj 138884 SANTA FIE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 5958.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1n 138685 SCHWIND AMERICA f312.50 PUMP PARTS 138886 R.CRAIG SCOTT 6 ASSOC. $4,070.00 LEGAL SERVICES 138887 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $4.127.91 SPECIALTY GASES 138888 SEA COAST DESIGNS 51,614.52 LAB SUPPLIES 138989 SEAL BLACK $43.10 ASPHALT REPAIRS 138890 SHURELUCK SALES $3,579.43 TOOLSMRDWARE 135891 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION. $155.66 LAB SUPPLIES 138892 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $444.31 LAB SUPPLIES 138893 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $646.59 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 138894 SMITH-EMERY CO. $526.50 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-94 138895 SMITH PIPE 8 SUPPLY 8453.13 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 138895 SCAOMD UPDATE TRAINING $506.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 138897 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. 961,471.30 POWER 138898 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $94.65 WATER USE 138899 WESTALLOY,INC. $333.37 WELDING SUPPLIES 138900 SPECTRO OIL WEST $70.90 ENGINE OIL 135901 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $528.00 LAB SUPPLIES 138902 STANDARD REGISTER CO. $5,900.96 LAB SUPPLIES 138903 STERLING ART $125.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES 138904 GARY G.STREED $3,123.42 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL 138905 SUNRAY LIGHTING $49.11 LAB SUPPLIES 138906 SUNSET FORD $202.73 TRUCK PARTS 138907 SUPELCO,INC. $521.58 LAB SUPPLIES 138908 SUPER CHEM CORP. $945.56 CHEMICALS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/07194 PAGE O6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/13/94 POSTING DATE 07/13M4 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 138909 TARBY ENGINEERING $421.00 PUMP PARTS 138910 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE $3.250.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 138911 TEKMAR COMPANY $5,630.57 LAB SUPPLIES 130912 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK $6.718.13 TRUSTEE SERVICES 138913 THOMAS FISH CO. $107.25 LAB SUPPLIES 138914 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $203.32 MECHANICAL PARTS 138915 TONY'S LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $144A7 LOCKS 8 KEYS 138916 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $762.98 TRUCK PARTS 138917 TRUESDAIL LABS $1 414.52 LAB SERVICES 138918 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. 5274.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS 130919 TUSTIN DODGE $240.59 TRUCK PARTS 130920 TWINING LABORATORIES $11,633.87 LAB SERVICES M.0.7117191 138921 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $555.00 LAB SUPPLIES 138922 THE UNISOURCE CORP. $650.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES 138923 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $346.66 PARCEL SERVICES m 138924 VWR SCIENTIFIC $5.033.36 LAB SUPPLIES Z 138926 VALIN CORPORATION $340.82 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 138926 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2.154.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 138927 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $150.18 ENGINE PARTS 138928 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $600.75 LAB SUPPLIES 138929 VILLAGE NURSERIES $323.90 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 138930 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS 543,768.51 CHEMICALS M.O.319194 Cl 138931 WECO INDUSTRIES,INC. $201.75 TOOL 138932 WELLER MFG. $60.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136933 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $16.186.62 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8.12.92 138934 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $1.334.49 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 138935 WESCO $454.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS 138936 WITEG $80.81 LAB SUPPLIES 139937 XEROX CORP. $4.533.05 COPIER LEASES 139930 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $214.36 VALVE 130939 YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEMS $162,39 FREIGHT 138940 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $462.81 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 138941 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID O5/04194 $2,833.306.21 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7107194 PAGE07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07113194 POSTING DATE 07/13/94 SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPER FUND $764.82 02 OVER FUND 5.972.39 42 CAP FAC FUND 4,352.58 p3 OPER FUND 39.245.29 03 CAP FAC FUND 338.71 05 OPER FUND 3,187.14 05 CAP FAC FUND 185,511.25 p7 OPER FUND 8.033.84 p7 CAP FAC FUND 1.971.86 011 OPER FUND 7,175.94 p71 CAP FAC FUND 4,571.47 fT1 X 2OPER FUND 34.11 2 0140PERFUND 71.80 R14 CAP FAC FUND 7,166.77 p588 OPER FUND 2.345.03 -I 0596 CAP FAC FUND 44.326.44 D "97 OPER FUND 2,873.21 I 07A14 OPER FUND 4,802.51 v JT OPER FUND 697.627.92 CORP 1,588,870.17 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 27,004.74 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 195,793.06 .___.. . . . .._.__ Pt•-_ 62,832,940.93 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 720/94 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0727194 POSTING DATE 07127/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 138972 AG TECH COMPANY $62.619.42 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 138973 AT&T $3.467.69 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 138974 AT&T $1.486.72 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 138975 AT&T $4.06 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 138976 ACCELERATED POWER TECH. $2.642.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 138977 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP, $7.530.00 ENGINE TESTING J-19 138978 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $26.70 ASPHALT 138979 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $68,122A0 CONSTRUCTION P2-53.1 138980 ANDATACO $1,267.69 PRINTING SERVICES 138981 ANI%TER-DISTRIBUTION $906.34 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 138982 ANSYS $105.25 LAB SUPPLIES 138983 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $923.75 LAB SUPPLIES 138984 ARMOR-VAC $318.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 138985 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $130.16 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 138986 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $282.20 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL X 138987 ASSOC.ADMINIS.B CONSULTANTS $690.00 INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS = 138988 ATKINUONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 138989 RANDOLPH AUSTIN.CO. $632.32 LAB SUPPLIES 138990 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $1,410.57 PAYROLL SERVICES 138991 AVERY DENNISON $136.40 OFFICE EQUIPMENT tp 138992 AVNET COMPUTER $13,127A3 COMPUTER WORKSTATION I 138993 BKK LANDFILL S4,075.83 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 �-' 138994 B.M.I. $132.42 ELECTRICAL PARTS 136995 BRW SAFETY 8 SUPPLY $78.01 SAFETY SUPPLIES 138996 BARR COMMERCIAL DOOR $1,770.00 DOOR REPAIRS 138997 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $339.54 BATTERIES 130998 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $4,303.45 LAB SUPPLIES 138M WIT BILLARD,INC. $577.05 BUILDING REPAIRS 139000 BIO VENTURES,INC. $162.00 LAB SUPPLIES 139001 BISHOP COMPANY $30661 TOOLS 139002 BON-A-RUES $246.00 TRUCK PARTS 139003 BOOT BARN $82.33 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 139MM BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $68,009.71 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7.18,3-38,6-13 139005 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.515,00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 139M BNI BOOKS $59.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139007 BUSH B ASSOCIATES,INC. $3,-28.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6.8-94 139WS BUY-CHEM DISTRIBUTORS $8,785.94 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139009 CEM CORPORATION $5.015.36 LAB EQUIPMENT 139010 C.L.TECHNOLOGY $720.00 LAB SERVICES 139011 CS COMPANY $3,985.90 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139012 C 8 W FIBER OPTICS $304.57 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139013 CALTROL,INC. $574.13 HARDWARE 139014 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $1.050.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 139015 CARLETON ENGINEERS $510.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 139016 CAROLLO-BOYLE ENGINEERS $524.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33 139017 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $2,920.99 SAFETY SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 720/94 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0727M POSTING DATE 0727194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 139018 CERFNET $32.10 COMPUTER SERVICES 139019 CIRCUIT MASTERS $485.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 139020 CLYDE COAST MACH.TOOL REPAIR E660.00 WELDING SUPPLIES 139021 COAST RUBBER STAMP $358.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139022 COLICH 8 SONS $515,490.75 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 139023 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $3,685.05 HARDWARE 139024 COMPUSERVE $105.64 COMPUTER SERVICES 139025 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $942.81 ELECTRIC PARTS 139026 CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS $104.35 FREIGHT 139027 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $89.51 TOOLS 139028 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $4,460.86 CHLORINE M.0.10.9-91 139029 CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY $35.76 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139030 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $1.973.85 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11-93 139031 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $1.529.75 ENGINE PARTS m 132032 CORTECH ENGINEERING 51,700.60 LAB SUPPLIES X 139033 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $472.57 TRUCK PARTS m 139034 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.390.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139035 CHARLES P.CROWLEY $1.495.02 PUMP PARTS 139036 CSUS FOUNDATION,INC. E34.B0 PUBLICATION 139037 CA DEPT.OF HEALTH SERVICES $3,493.00 ANNUALFEE Lb 139038 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $143.63 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEE 139039 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL $124.92 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK OVERSIGHT FROG. N 139040 DME,INC. $2.139A6 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139041 J.W.IYANGELO CO,INC. $562.66 HARDWARE 139042 DELL COMPUTER CORP. $573.38 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139043 DEL0TITE 6 TOUCHE $90,272.00 FINANCE SYSTEM NEEDS ASSESSMENT 139W DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALIF. $39.059.95 DENTAL PLAN 139045 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $348.68 LAB SUPPLIES 139D46 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $570.20 FREIGHT 139047 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $11.001.82 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8.11.93 139048 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $9,074.55 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139049 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $348.26 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 139050 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $143.63 PAINT SUPPLIES 139051 DWYER INSTRUMENT,INC. $996A4 ELECTRIC PARTS 139052 DVALS SALES $130.18 FITTINGS 139053 E SA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $1,785.00 LAB ANALYSIS 139054 EIMCO PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO. $759.91 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 139055 E S S $97.73 LAB SUPPLIES 139055 EASTMAN,INC. $1.417.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139057 JAMES E.ELLIOT $5.000.00 CLAIM 7-CSD-94-L-12 139058 ENCHANTER,INC. $5.600,00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 139059 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES $213.16 PIPING REPAIRS 139060 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $608.04 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 139061 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 511,150.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O. 10-9-91 139062 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $331.60 AIR FREIGHT 1391363 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $11.361.18 FILTERS FUNDNO BIBS - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/20/94 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/27/94 POSTING DATE 07/27/94 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 139064 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $1.050.36 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 139065 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,524.03 LAB SUPPLIES 139066 FLO-SYSTEMS $1,098.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139067 CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $1,258.50 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O6-10-92 139068 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $5.55 PHOTO SUPPLIES 139069 GST,INC. $60,433.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139070 THE GARTNER GROUP $34.500.00 COMPUTER SYSTEM CONSULTING M.O.e-8-94 139071 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $1,023.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139072 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $167.24 ELECTRIC PARTS 139073 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. 54,420.75 TELEPHONE SERVICES 139074 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $12,670.13 PUMP PARTS 139075 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $277.78 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 139076 GRAPHIC MANAGEMENT GROUP,INC. $767.50 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 139077 GRASSY S.T.I. $2,710.47 ENGINE PARTS 139076 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $10,128.50 PUMP PARTS f71 139079 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $1,922.22 PLUMBING SUPPLIES X 139080 PL HAWN CO,INC. $1,371.30 FILTERS 2 13908 HEWLETT PACKARD E1, .00 SERVICE AGREEMENT � 739082 HEWLETT PACNARD CO. E269269.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 139083 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,143.56 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139054 HUNTINGTON VALLEY TOOL $77.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 139085 IDEA MAN,INC. $314.11 PUBLICATION W 139087 IMPERIAL WEST CNCES E11$24,V49 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 139087 INTERNA I OALEQUIP $142.00 LAB SUPPLIES 1 J9088 INTERNATIONAL EQUIPMENT CO. $142.00 LAB SUPPLIES 139089 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $69547 BATTERIES 139090 ISCO,INC. $408.97 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139091 J2 PRINTING SERVICES $1.183.10 PRINTING 139092 JACAT OIL CO. 560.40 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 139093 JAMISON ENGINEERING 512,118.67 MANHOLE INSPECTION 139094 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $500.42 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139095 JAVID CONTRACTORS,INC. $180,484.92 CONSTRUCTION P2-23.5.1 139096 JAY'S CATERING $144.65 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 139097 LINDA J.JOHNSON $4,000.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 139098 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $95.87 ELECTRIC PARTS 139099 KELLY BLUE BOOK $128.00 SUBSCRIPTION 139100 KING BEARING.INC. $12.628.41 MACHINE SUPPLIES 139101 KIRST PUMP&MACHINE WORKS $1,263.76 PUMP PARTS 139102 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2.080.02 TOOLS 139103 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $150.74 PUMP PARTS 139104 LA TRONICS $1,991,09 CAMERA EQUIPMENT 139105 LAS SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $320.77 LAB SUPPLIES 139106 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L.LAVOIE $1.276.70 LEGAL SERVICES-NITZEN 139107 LAYMAN,JONES&DYE LAWYERS $2.195.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.5-13.92 13910E LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGR. 588,86SAI ENGINEERING SERVICES P140-2 139109 K.P.LINDSTROM.INC. $2.280.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIRONMENTAL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7120194 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/27M4 POSTING DATE 07127/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 139110 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $970.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.8-10-92 139111 MEDICAL PLASTICS LABORATORY $1.836.50 TRAINING MATERIALS 139112 MPS $169.55 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 139113 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $6,201.39 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 139114 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $95.23 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139115 MATT-CHLOR.INC. $2.481.67 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 139116 MCGRAW HILL,INC. $113.14 PUBLICATIONS 139117 METALUBE CORP. $323.25 CLEANER 139118 MICROAGE $1,174,48 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139119 MIDWAY MFG.S MACHINING $5,411.10 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 139120 MISCO $386.26 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139121 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $1,077.83 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 139122 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $1,141,558.12 CONSTRUCTION 14-14A 139123 MONITOR LABS E239.26 INSTRUMENT 139124 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $12,155.85 LAB SERVICES m 139125 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. $96.25 FREIGHT )< 139126 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $72.56 HARDWARE 2 139128 MOTOR WEST,INC,C. E10312.26 INSLAB SUPENT PLIES PARTS � 139128 NASCO WEST,IN E312.28 LAB SUPPLIES 139129 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES,INC. $2,664.10 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 139130 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS I 139131 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $3.959.04 PLUMBING SUPPLIES r 139132 NOREEN PRODUCTS $192.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139133 OI CORPORATION $1,540.05 LAB SUPPLIES 139134 THE OHMART CORP. $2.221,52 WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICES 139135 DX SYSTEMS CO. $6,841,53 CHLORINE M.OAI-18-92 139136 ON TECHNOLOGY $636.50 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 139137 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $168.32 TRUCK PARTS 139138 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY CO. $1,843.15 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 139139 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE E667.18 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139140 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $1.540.17 FITTINGS 139141 OXYGEN SERVICE E4,415.61 SPECIALTY GASES 139142 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $53,265.00 GAP WATER USE M.O.6-9-93 139143 PACCO SALES $102.90 PAINT SUPPLIES 139144 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $83.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139145 PACIFIC BELL $228.84 TELEPHONE SERVICES 139146 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $488.36 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 139147 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $313.359,49 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 139148 POLYPURE,INC. $24.536.30 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 139149 POWER HOUSE FORD ENGINES $1.662.04 TRUCK PARTS 139150 PREMIER STEEL $1.679.31 METAL 139151 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $1,347.25 FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.6RM 139152 PULSAFEEDER $3,919.28 PUMP PARTS 139153 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $167.44 BUILDING MATERIALS 139154 QUEST MEDIA B SUPPLIES $1,191.87 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 139155 W.QUINN ASSOC. E2,604.38 COMPUTER SOFTWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7120194 PAGE 05 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0727/94 POSTING DATE 0727194 WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT 139155 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. $3.688.00 COMPUTER SERVICES M.O.8-12-92 139157 R&R INSTRUMENTS $65.62 CHART PAPER 139155 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1.687.08 TRASH REMOVAL 139159 RAXCO,INC. $5,589.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 139160 BOLT DELIVERY $29.00 FREIGHT 139161 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY 54,39T37 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139162 ROBBINS SCIENTIFIC $2.527.53 LAB SUPPLIES 139163 SAFETY CARE,INC. $193.94 SAFETY FILM RENTAL 139164 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $144.97 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139165 SANWA BANK $126.839.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 14-1-1A 139166 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $506.50 SPECIALTY GASES 139167 SEA COAST DESIGNS 5248.26 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139168 SEA-TECH,INC. $1.520.00 LAB REPAIRS 139169 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.356.69 TOOLS 139170 SHASTA ELECTRIC 58,000.00 ELECTRICAL SERVICES m 139171 SHURELUCK SALES $7,517.50 TOOLS/HARDWARE X 139172 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. SI00.B4 LAB SUPPLIES ._. 139173 SIMS WELDING SUPPLY $7.50 WELDING SUPPLIES b0 139174 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $105.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 139175 SMITH-EMERY CO. $486.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 139176 SOUTH COAST WATER E68.25 SERVICE AGREEMENT 0U 139177 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO. $36,999.42 POWER 139178 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $143,868.28 POWER 139180 SO CALIF.EDIAS.CO.CO. $10.359S34.93 .18 FERCNATURAL PENALTY 139180 SO.CAL.OAS.CO. E$7.592.07 NATURAL GAS 139151 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. 57,592.07 DIESEWNLEADED FUEL 139182 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 52,609.70 DRINKING WATEWCOOLER RENTALS 139183 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $59.47 LAB SUPPLIES 139184 STATAGENE $353.69 LAB SUPPLIES 139185 GARY G STREED $5.331.77 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 139168 SUPER ICE CORP. $9222 LAB SUPPLIES 139187 TARBY ENGINEERING E73,316.00 PUMP PARTS 139188 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $128.64 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 139189 TEKMAR COMPANY S1I2.07 LAB SUPPLIES 139190 TELE-CELL,INC. S58L31 TELEPHONE SUPPLIES 139191 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. $980.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139192 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO. $3,468.30 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING W0.1-13-92 139193 TRANSMATION,INC. $69.61 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139194 TRANSPORT LAW RESEARCH E131,95 TRAINING MATERIALS 139195 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $1,301.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.717093&61801 139195 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $556 68 TRUCK PARTS 139197 TRUESDAIL LABS $2.738.96 LAB SERVICES 139190 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $17,601.24 INSTRUMENTS 139199 TWINING LABORATORIES $5.241.50 LAB SERVICES 139200 UHLER,INC. $93,567.49 CONSTRUCTION 5.32&5-33 139201 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $108.00 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/20194 PAGE 06 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07/27/94 POSTING DATE 07/27/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 139202 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $156.41 PARCEL SERVICES 139203 UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. $4,783.81 TECHITE CLAIM DOCUMENT COSTS 139204 VWR SCIENTIFIC $467.20 LAB SUPPLIES 139205 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $602.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139206 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $1.296.22 LAB SUPPLIES 139207 VERNE'S PLUMBING $525.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 139208 VILLAGE NURSERIES $228.35 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 139209 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $10.985.91 CHEMICALS 139210 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $2,057.64 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 139211 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $325.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139212 XEROX CORP. $1.880.37 COPIER LEASES 139213 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. 61,389.68 LAB SUPPLIES 139214 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS $3.222.44 INSTRUMENTS 139215 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $92.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139210 2YMARK CORP. $20,601.50 LAB EQUIPMENT X E3,784,331.22 2 t" SUMMARY AMOUNT 82 OAP FAC FUND 47.03 50 P2 CAP FAC FUND 16.90 pi 83 OPER FUND 6.574.13 03 CAP FAC FUND 16,574.73 05 OPER FUND 24.23' 05 CAP FAC FUND 93.567.49 07 OPER FUND 115.69 07 CAP FAC FUND 7.370.16 911 OPER FUND 15.56 011 CAP FAC FUND 515.490.75 014 CAP FAC FUND 1,274,434.42 8586 CAP FAC FUND 4,688.58 97814 OPER FUND 12.85 JT OPER FUND 967,806.65 CORF 651,635.39 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 46.026,65 .IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 199,052.36 3.31.22--__ $3,778,826.94 RE AGwA uEm iVO.//(N(,�141 `)1� A4-&4-7 9/rsr/yy _ RECEIVED '94 SEP 14 P4 Vg i NGINEERING DEPI - CS00C Management Review of the Proposed Plant Automation Group for the Sanitation Districts of Orange County _ September 14, 1994 J ERNST&YOUNG LLP Plant Automation Group Review Introduction Emst&Young(E&Y) was engaged by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) to review the plans for a Plant Automation Group (Group), and to develop recommendations on the proposed group's charter, reporting relationships, size and — composition. E&Y reviewed ❑ a number of relevant documents that identified why the Districts determined that it needed such a team, W ❑ minutes of the task force created to discuss and recommend a structure for the Group, and ❑ CH2M Hill's evaluation of the HSQ system. ,r Additionally, the following people were interviewed: Blake Anderson Allen Carrie(CH2M Hill) Doug Cook Mark Esquer Steve Hovey Gerry Jones Margie Nellor Bob Ooten .. Stewart Severn Gary Streed George Thuro Jack Vincent - r r r r I JENNST&YOUNG LLP r Plant Automation Group Review r Findings r 1. After reading the material related to the proposed Group and interviewing a number of people at the Districts, it was determined that the proposal before the Board to create an Automation Group is reasonable. While we have identified a number of issues r that need to be addressed and have recommended changes, the need for such a group is clear. The Group will play an important role in the future success of the organization. r 2. Operations, Maintenance, Engineering, and Information Services agree that the Group is necessary for the Districts to reach its objectives of: r ❑ obtaining and analyzing available plant information ❑ planning and implementation of plant automation r ❑ ensuring consistency and standards in all plant projects. 3. The emphasis placed on the specific responsibilities of the Group varied by division. Virtually each individual interviewed had a different task list for the Group, although Information Services had a clear view of the Group's overall proposed focus. r 4. Information Services and Maintenance anticipate that Maintenance will continue to service the existing hardware and software for the next two years as the Group incrementally assumes responsibility for the maintenance of the new plant control systems. The specific systems and the division of responsibilities regarding them are undefined. 5. The following concerns were identified regarding the Group from various r interviewees: ❑ Some engineers are concerned that the Group will be too involved in design r work and the programming of PLCs,which they consider to be responsibilities of Engineering. However, while Engineering is responsible for the management of contractors who conduct design, Engineering does not design r process logic, nor sign-off specifically on PLC design work. Additionally, it is the Maintenance Division which supports changes and modifications to the PLCs. ❑ Some engineers are also concerned that the Group will lack required engineering instrumentation knowledge. Operations, Maintenance, and Information Services believe that this knowledge is important but not essential ., to the core function and may be obtained from the Engineering division, as needed. ❑ Some engineers do not think that a group outside of Engineering should be involved in process control because this is considered to be an Engineering function. r r 2 999 ERNST&YOUNG LLP r Plant Automation Group Review Cl The currently proposed level of staffing may be low given the high expectations cited by the interviewees. r ❑ The Group needs a manager to perform purely managerial and project management tasks and to engage the other divisions' assistance. r 6. Historically,technical training for new systems and software at the Districts has been limited. Each interviewee indicated the need for extensive training of the new Group to learn and support the new technology. r 7. One of the factors affecting the decision regarding where the Group should be located is that the Group and its objectives touch on many areas: Operations, Maintenance, . Engineering,and Information Services. 8. A distinction exists in the mode of operation between the divisions,which impacts the location of the Group. Operations and Maintenance are oriented to maintaining on- going processes, while Engineering is oriented towards projects. The Group will need to function in both a project mode (design and install) and in an on-going process mode (maintenance). This approach is closely aligned with that of the Information Services Division, which has the background and proven capability to address both modes of work. ,., 9. Information Services recognizes that it does not have process control knowledge, but anticipates leveraging that knowledge, in a cooperative manner, from the Engineering, Operations, and Maintenance divisions. This has a second desired d effect of maintaining on-going cooperation and coordination across the agency to limit the risk of the automation group isolating itself from other portions of the agency. 10. Information Services has established good lines of communication within the Districts,has developed a customer focus perspective, and has built credibility among the divisions. 11. The Group will be composed of six team members. It will include a Systems Engineer, a Project Specialist (from Operations), a Programmer/Analyst (CRISP), two Programmers,and an Information Services Technician III (CAD Specialist). The job positions are outlined in the Staff Report dated August 18,1994. ❑ The Systems Engineer position will focus on computer technology, networking, and process control issues as they relate to plant automation. The ^�+ Group may design a system architecture, but it would be reviewed and approved by Operations and Engineering before being confirmed. ,. ❑ Of the three individuals in Maintenance who perform the system maintenance, one will be moved to the new Group. Likewise, an individual from Operations has been identified for the Project Specialist position. The Specialist position will be on a job rotation basis and will matrix to the Operations Division. 12. An important aspect of the Group's methodology will be its interaction with contractors during the design phase and the Group's development and use of e. standards. Following the contractor's completion of the design and construction 3 JERNS T&YOUNG L L P r Plant Automation Group Review r phases, acceptance testing of the process control logic will occur. Similarly, maintenance changes will occur in a test lab to ensure that the changes are stable prior r to implementation to a PLC. 13. In 1989, the 2020 Vision Master Plan was written to provide a strategic direction for the Districts. The Plan a identified a strategy for an integrated control system that would enable computer data handling, information availability, and monitoring systems. This should be updated, given the progress of computer technology over the past five years. r 14. In several interviews, we inquired as to the testing and change control procedures used for system implementations and never received a definitive answer that full r documented acceptance testing occurs before implementation. 15. To date,resources have not been applied to either systems architecture and standards, nor to the revision of documentation following changes to the Plant Automation control systems.This has caused problems for design projects and made maintenance difficult. The recently augmented J-31 contract is a step toward addressing this issue. r r r r r r r r 4 .0 ERNS T&YOUNG LLP r Plant Automation Group Review r Conclusions 1. The formation of the new Automation Group supports the 2020 Vision Master Plan. The current teaming initiatives of the Districts are supported by forming a multi- discipline team of specialists who will focus on the long range objectives of the Districts regarding standardization, automation and information availability. Additionally, the objectives of the Group will complement the high-level system plan of linking the Maintenance Measurement system and the Limbs system, the collection and reporting of data,database integration,and standardization of platforms. The J- "' 31 CH2M Hill project will introduce broad integration of process control and will assist in developing standards,which are critical to the future success of the Districts. 2. In the near term, technology, system architecture,system design and integration need to be addressed. The new Group will be very busy for the next two years participating in the J-31 contract, implementing the new hardware and software, documenting standards and updating documentation. The work will be somewhat cyclical as driven by the system roll-out schedule and the assumption of hardware support responsibilities from the Maintenance division. However, once the J-31 contract ends and the first phase of the plant automation is in place, the work flow of the team should become more consistent. The team will have developed significant skills, will have established and tested standards and will have the experience of a successful project underneath them. 3. Standard MIS techniques would be applicable to the data highway and the networking of PLCs and other components into the computer architecture. Consequently, there will be much synergy derived from the location of the Group within MIS. 4. The identified staffing level of six people is light given that Maintenance currently has three individuals devoted to the task of system maintenance alone. However,because Maintenance will continue supporting Operations, the identified staffing level is a reasonable starting point. The Group will be small enough to manage and can be more easily trained and will allow for the group to grow as demands and objectives of ,r the Group evolve. Initially, the issue of staffing to support 24 hour operations becomes less pertinent given the continued support from Maintenance. 5. In staffing the Group,it is likely that the Districts will need to recruit CRISP expertise from outside the organization. Current resources will provide consistency and a knowledge base of how the Districts facilities work. New recruits will help to add depth to the Group's collective skill set and introduce a fresh perspective. d 6. The composition of the team will support the basic mandate of the Group, plant automation. The composition will allow flexibility to grow or to change required skill sets. However, the Group will need to be bolstered with specific expertise from other functional areas on an as-needed basis. This is consistent with a team approach to problem resolution. 7. The requirement that the Systems Engineer for the Group be a P.E. is more of a preference than a need. The skills of the individual should focus on systems architecture, system design and implementation, and plant process control. We were .. unable to identify any need for a P.E. designation at this time given that there are no r 5 Ml ERNST&YOUNG OF r -� Plant Automation Group Review statutory codes, nor any sign-offs required on specific process control logic. Although currently design is contracted out, this may change in the future as the ..� Group becomes more involved in the design phases of a project. Then, the need for a P.E. may increase. The sign-off and acceptance of process control designs could draw on the resources of the Engineering division, when necessary. Likewise, the need for instrumentation knowledge can be exploited from the Engineering division. 8. The Automation Group will only succeed through the combined efforts of all divisions in the Districts. It must be allowed to focus on selected critical objectives r before it begins handling day-to-day operations. Initially, it must focus on: ❑ developing a customer focus toward Operations d ❑ learning and analyzing new system architectures, hardware,and software „r ❑ understanding and learning how to support and maintain the new systems arising from the J-31 contract ❑ reviewing and participating on proposed projects r ❑ writing and testing standards for the entire organization to use. 9. As the group becomes more involved in the design process, they will need tools for stability testing of the P&IDs. There are a number of techniques common in process control design (Nyquist analysis, root-locus analysis, zero-pole plotting and Bode analysis) and the Group would need supporting tools to assist in documentation and testing. 10. Some interviewees focused on pans of the Group's responsibilities which were closest to their current interests and experience. Consequently, the importance of the systems integration function, which is new, was not fully appreciated. Systems architecture and integration is a crucial responsibility, given the J31 project, and w should be defined as a Critical Success Factor in the Master Plan. 11. Given the participation of a senior operations representative,on a rotational basis, in ,r the Group,combined with the customer focus of MIS, we do not consider the actual geographic location of the Group to be an issue. r r r d W 6 JERNST&YOUNCUP r Plant Automation Group Review Recommendations r 1. The Automation Group should be a resource for the entire organization with a primary focus toward its customer, Operations. The Group should reside within the Information Services Department,as a separate group, for the following reasons: ❑ Information Services maintains a customer focus and its management philosophy is consistent and supports the primary objectives of the Group ❑ Information Services has established good communications between the various divisions ❑ The Director of Information Services has proven management skills which will enable him to prioritize the work of the group and to be the champion for the Group's efforts d✓ ❑ Information Services has the management experience,capability, and focus on projects as well as on-going maintenance. Understanding both modes of r working is essential to the success of the new group ❑ The Group will maintain a primary focus of supporting Operations and will not be diverted to work on other non-charter projects ❑ Information Services has familiarity and strength in understanding system architecture and networking. Pronosed Organizational Chart for the Automation Group Director of Information Services r R M Plant AutomationGroupport Systems Engincer d Project t Progmmmer/ Programmer Services ns Analyst (2) echnician III tive (CAD) ) ar r 7 M1 ERNST&YOUNG LLP r Plant Automation Group Review 2. Operations, Engineering,Maintenance and Information Services should collectively define the charter of the new Group,clearly identifying its specific responsibilities in — the near team, 1-2 years, and thereafter. Each division must "buy-in" to the mission and charter of the Group,if it is to succeed. The Group's charter should focus on: ❑ Support of the Operations Division ❑ Provide engineering integration assistance through software and hardware analysis and the setting of standards r ❑ Support of the Maintenance Division regarding system and software modifications and changes r ❑ Assist in the roll-out of the J-31 contract so that a transfer of knowledge between CH2M Hill and the Districts occurs - ❑ Analyze and recommend system and network architecture and system design and integration proposals. 3. The Group should carefully identify the skill sets of the individuals it plans to hire with an intention of growing those individuals as the Group's role and responsibilities increase. Because the search for a CRISP programmer may take six months, the recruiting effort should begin immediately. If the field of candidates appears to be inadequate, the Districts should select an individual, from either internally or externally, that could be readily trained in this language and begin the training right away. 4. Cooperation and assistance between the divisions must be fostered. A team-like approach to problem resolution is fundamental to building a responsive organization. The Districts should employ the concept of"Concurrent Engineering," which solicits the input and commitment of all relevant divisions early in the conception and design stages. Concurrent Engineering allows for all parts of an organization to be included in the initial phases of a project in order that problems specific to, say,operations and maintenance be identified and addressed early while the cost of change is low. Involving participants in parallel, rather than in a hand-off mode, adds value to the — final product. 5. If the Group is short in an area of expertise, such as instrumentation,assistance from the appropriate division should be provided on a matrix management basis. Matrix management is a management style in which an individual has a direct reporting relationship to one area and a dotted reporting relationship to another. The individual participates in activities or functions in both areas but generally has a primary focus ,. on one or the other. This approach will help to maximize the effectiveness of the entire organization and still allow the Group the flexibility it needs. 6. As pan of the Group's design involvement, tools for documenting the process control logic using an integrated database to ensure the integrity of the design should be acquired. r r 8 NERNST&YOUNCUP r Plant Automation Group Review 7. Before any system component of the new J-31 project is placed into production, full documented acceptance testing should occur in a test lab to ensure the outcome is the desired one. 8. The 2020 Vision Master Plan needs to be updated due to the ever-changing nature of technology. This plan was created in 1989,and computer technology has progressed significantly since then. 9. There should be a regularly scheduled process automation user group meeting which would obligate all parties to access progress and ensure that the group stays on track in a customer focused manner. r r r r r it r r r 9 -`9ERNST&YOUNG L L P r REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN 9-14-94 1 ) Presentation of Plaque to Outgoing Joint Chairman Mahoney. Present plaque to outgoing Joint Chairman Bill Mahoney. (Note: Staff also has a memento to present to Mr. Mahoney.) 2) Upcoming Meetings. A. Fiscal Policy Committee - The Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday September 21 st at 5:30 p.m. B. Executive Subcommittee - The Executive Subcommittee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, September 28th, at 4:30 p.m. C. Executive Committee - The Executive Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, September 28th, at 5:30 p.m. D. Joint Works Selection Committee - The Joint Works Selection Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, September 28th, (Immediately following the Executive Committee Meeting) - Item 2 continued on next page - E. Operations Committee - The Operations Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, October 5th, at 5:30 p.m. F. Engineering & Construction Committee - The Engineering & Construction Committee is scheduled to meet on Thursday, October 6th, at 5:30 p.m. - End of Report - j Awpdoc\gm\jcrpts\jc0994 MEETINooATE September 14, 1994 nME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 d 14 DISTRICT I JOINT BOApOB (BEYER) . ........... BARREN .......... DEYER) ............. MASORA ....... NEADEI FENWMAN ........ O ASZL0) ............ BROWN ........... _ ILUTZ) ............. MC OUIOAN ........ INDFUM ............. CATLN . .......... — (STEINER) .......... . STANTON ......... ISCOTD ............. COLLINS .......... ✓ ISALTARELLB ....... . WORIEY .......... IDEBAYI ....... COX . . .......... i — ..... . (SANSONE) ........... DFBAY ........... ISELL)............... GENES ........... . DISTRICT 2 (NELSON( ............ BBRlRP'.......... — — ISCOIn ............ COLLINS .......... IMAERTZWEILdI ... ECXENRODE ....... Je —_ IDALYI ............. PICKLER ........... (READEI ............. REARYMAN ........ Jl — IBEYERI GAMMA .......... �� IMAHONEYI........ MOM ........... .Lg� INORBYI ............ CATLIN ........... MONE) .............. GRIFFIN ........... ✓ —_ (BELLI .............. GENES ............ IWELOII ............. OULLIXSON ........ — (MAERTZWEILER) ..... ECK NRODE ........ IWARDI .......... HAMMOND ...... jr— _ (FLOM) ............ MAHONEY ......... ICOXI ............ HART ............ (PARKER) ........... NELSON ........... IMOULTON-PATTER60N1.. LENZIO ........... ✓ _ ILUTS) ............. IMLmB. ........... IMINERI ............. LINN ............. _ ISTENERI ........... STANTON ......... IMC DUNGAN) ......... LUTZ............. JC — IOULLIMONI ......... WELCH ......... (FLOM) ............. MAHONEY ......... . ISINOERI ............ ZLAKET ........... ILUTZI .............. MC OUIOAN........ IPULIDOI ............. MOUND .......... — DISTRICTB IROBITAILLEI .......... MOYLTON.RWIIMSII _ (ESTRADA) .......... SAPRN ........... / (PARKER) ........... NELSON . ......... JG — — (NELSON) ........... 9BMWP........... y (DUNLA% ............ PARKER........... Q ILA52L01 ........... BROWN ........... INIMOLBON) ......... PARTIN ........... . — (NORBYI CATLIN ........... y IDALYI .............. FICKLER .......... (SCOTTI .......... COLLNS ........ IWORLEY) ............ POTTS ........... (MAHONEY).......... MOM ............ MUM ........... PLIMSB ........... — IBONEI ............. GRffUI ........... IEVANSI ............. RICE ............. ✓ — (MINERI ............ LOIN ............. IPoTTSI ............. MLTARELM........ ✓ _ INC DUIOAN) ........ LUTZ ........... IDESAYI SANSONE ......... �C _ IROBITAILLEI ....... YRSB-IOIVPRTIlRSB11 IESTAAMI ......... SAREN ........... L INICHOWONI ........ PARTN ........... RLAKETI....... SINGER ........... —... — IDALYI . ....... FICKLER ........... STEINER)............. STANTON ......... ✓ — IEVANSI ............ RICE .. ........... . ISTANTONI ........... STEINER .......... ✓ _ RLAKETI............ BINDER .. (MILLER( ............. SWAN............ ✓ — ••••••••• (SELVAOOI) ........... SYLVIA ........... JL ISELVAGI ........... SYLVIA . ......... ISELVAOOII .......... eYLVM :GULLMPORRY/SOEAFER) .... ..... WAHNM ........ JG — IOULLNSONI .......... WELCH .. ......... JL DISTRICT6 (ROBITAILLEI .......... WNMELL ...... .. . — (DEBAYI ............ SANSONE ......... (SALTARELLO ......... WORIEY ....... .. .(STANTON) .......... STEINER ......... ISINGER) . .. .......... ZLAKET........ ... — — — IDEMY) ............ COX ............... — STAFF OTHER6 DISTRICTS SYLVESTER . WOODRUFF (PERRY) ............ WANNER .......... . DROWN . . .. ANWAR. .... ANDERSON JG DEMW.. .... .dr ( .......... HART............. BERENSON FLEMING .... _ (STANTON)TANTO .......... STFWER........... HASENSTAB HOHENER ... DISTRICT 7 HODGES ... HOUGH ..... KAYE ..... HOWARD . IWAR01 ............ NAMMOND......... KYLE ..... JC HUNT ...... IPOTTSI ............ SALTARELLI ........ CINDER .... MOW . .... Jl IBEYER) ............ BARREN .......... — ISANSONEI .......... DE&IV.. ........:: HELLOS ... LEE STROM ..(MUDD) ............ MMEI ........ OOTE L.... . LINON- .. — ISTANTONI .......... STENER.......... STREW EN .... SHAW. . ... — ISCHEAFEA) ......... WANNER .......... VINMN SHOW. . . ... — VINCENT... STONE . . . .. J� DISTRICT IT TALKS .... WASON. . ... — IROBITAILLEI ... ... . .. WINCHELL ......... WINSOR ... -A� YOUNG . .... — (MOULTON-PATTERSONI. LEIPSIO ........... CAkv &-444 - LF.AL�6 (STEINER) ........... STANTON ......... Jl DISTRICT IS - IWELM) ........... . GULUXSON ........ ✓ yW� (N1NLA% .......... . PARKER ........... jQ( IBEYERI ........... . BARREN .......... /`�^✓ (DALYI ......... . P " CKLER .. ......... J( (STANTONI .......... STEINER........... J� _ DISTRICT.. C T IWARD)I . .......... . SWAN ND ......... ,.LO-4,^r�j'�R. ,'•xY,i IN/AR01 . ........... HAMMOND.........IBEYERI _ WORLE ............ BARRIEPOTTS .......... / DLI03 IWORLEY) ........... PoTiB 07/2 Ilea ISTANTMII ........ . . STEINER........... J� PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY September 14, 1994 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION FIRM Please Print Please Print Cs o 09/14/94- JOINT BOARD MEETING N6(a) - Report of Joint Chairman JC: First item is the Joint Chairman's Report and I believe we have a new Director with us tonight, Earl Robitaille. Is that correct? Earl, you have to receive an award here. Robitaills: Oh, really? JC: This is a special Medal of Honor for serving on this Board, so we would like to welcome you to your first time duty. (Presented Director with Districts' logo pin.) The next item is a special presentation. It is not a Christmas card. It is not a get well card. It's a congratulations card, if you will. Bill, will you come forward please. I would like to take the honor of presenting you with this plaque as we do with outgoing Joint Chairmen of the Districts and, boy, this is something you deserve because you did an absolutely outstanding job. We could congratulate you many times over and I think that this applause is an indication of the efforts you have put forth. Mahoney: I appreciate it, John. Thanks a lot. And it has been a real pleasure being the Chairman of this organization. I will say this. There is certainly a different perspective, and those that were Joint Chairmen can attest to this, sitting out there and sitting up here. You know, I don't have to look at all of you like I did before I had to be one of you. Thank you very much. JWS: I will use this because I know that my voice doesn't carry well. You don't get off that easy, Bill. A lot of us around here have aged in recent times as you can appreciate, but, Bill, you certainly don't look like you have. None the less, staff thought that we would like to present you with the senior version of the most basic tool of our trade here (presented a black cane/plunger). Mahoney: Where is Irv? I think he might be able to handle this. JWS: On a more serious note, as Joint Chairman Cox said, unless you sit in that chair, unless you are at the other end of the telephone line or the fax line, it is really hard to appreciate the Joint Chairman's job. It takes a significant commitment and Bill has always been there for Staff to help and guide and counsel us in probably what has been the most difficult year in the Districts' history. So as a small token of our appreciation, Bill, we would like to present you with this picture of the Senior Staff(picture framed in oak toilet seat). Again, as a very small token of our appreciation and esteem. You might notice that there are a few cracks and nicks here, but that is only because this is a used seat. Mahoney: Thank you, Wayne. I appreciate that. You know, I had heard when I was coming on down here this evening that there was a possibility that the reporter from the Register, Chris Knap's, picture might have been in here, so I will go home and put the old toilet seat back on. N6(c) - Report of General Counsel TLW: The only thing, Mr. Chairman, is when we get to closed session I have a request to add two items based on one is a report of a decision that had just come down and the other is a new matter that was just delivered and served on the Districts a couple of days ago. #7 - Approval of 8/10/94 Minutes Stanton: Abstain JC: You are abstaining, okay. Note that for Director Stanton. #6(a) - Report of Joint Chairman (continued) JC: Thank you, Penny. To beg your indulgence. I got so excited about Bill's awards here that I forgot to continue my report. Fiscal Policy Committee- Wednesday, September 21st at 5:30 p.m. Executive Sub-Committee- Wednesday, September 28th at 4:30 p.m. We have had requests from a couple of the Sub Committee members to have a discussion among ourselves as to the direction that the Sub Committee needs to go, and so we propose doing that before the Executive Committee Meeting that is scheduled for September 28th at 5:30 pm. If any of you have any problem with the Sub Committee meeting, let me know and we will try to work out some other arrangements. Executive Committee- Wednesday, September 28th at 5:30 p.m. Joint Works Selection Committee- Wednesday, September 28th immediately following the Executive Committee Meeting Items that we are going to be dealing with in other parts of the agenda have to do with the restructuring of the committees: Operations Committee - Wednesday, October 5th at 5:30 p.m. Engineering and Construction Committee - Thursday, October 6th at 5:30 pm So we will talk more about those meetings in the structure a little bit later. Any questions? #11 - Executive Committee Items Swan: Mr. Chairman, I would like to note that Item 11(a)(2) doesn't note my presence on here. If that would be reflected, I would appreciate it. JC: Okay, Penny, if you would note that. and Director Stanton is abstaining. With that we will consider them approved. Director Steiner is abstaining also. Thank you. Item 11(b)(1)(a) & (b), this is an action that was recommended by the Executive Committee and the Computer Committee. We do not have a Staff Report indicated. This item has been discussed for a great length of time, so I will consider a motion for approval. Any opposition? Yes, I am sorry, Bill. Question? I know, Bill has laryngitis tonight so we have to bear with him. Steiner: Item 11(b)(1)(b), the action increasing the professional services agreement fees by $523,300.00and $785,900.00,wouldn't an increase of this amount require it to go back out to bid? This is a question for staff. TLW: There is no requirement to, this is Professional Services, there is no requirement in our Purchasing Resolution to do that. Steiner: Wouldn't that be advisable since the nature of the increase of the professional services agreement? TLW: That is strictly a policy decision of the Directors. If they choose to do it, they can do that. Steiner: ??? JWS: Mr. Anderson can address that. SPA: The proposal for the addendum is a follow on the initial work that was initiated by CH2M Hill. The addendum was discussed at length at the Computer Selection Committee, as well as at the Executive Committee. I think that it was an issue that was at least broached. Staff's recommendation to go with Addendum 3 is basically because of the roughly year that CH21M Hill has been here, in going through the learning curve and on the basis of the recommendation on making a major change in direction of where we were headed with our computer program, they were just the logical choice. And in terms of the comparable costs of what CH2M Hill brought to us as opposed to other engineering firms, we believe that it was in line with the level of effort that is going to be required. JC: Okay, we have a motion and a second. Any opposition? One opposition, Director Steiner. Okay, consider that motion passed. Item 11(b)(2), this is a consideration of actions relative to the Plant Automation Group. We have an item here, (a) and (b). (b) relates to a reorganization of the Plant Automation Group which has been discussed at the Executive Committee and the Computer Selection Committee. In that process, a question came up because Ernst & Young had been involved in the organizational review and audit, as to whether the reorganization that is being discussed here is appropriate and so we had asked Ernst & Young to do an analysis of that very quickly and briefly and get it to this Committee tonight. So we have in the audience tonight Norm Kyle from Ernst & Young, who is here to speak on the subject, and a report is in your folder, it was handed out tonight. So Norm, do you just want to give us a brief heads up on your opinion on this reorganization. Kyle: Thank you. First of all I would like to thank the Board Members for the opportunity of conducting this study and, in spite of the short time frame, I would just like to point out that we were met with cooperation and openness from management and staff during the progress through this study. We were asked to address a number of items concerning the proposed Plant Automation Group and in terms of its need, the need for the group, staffing levels and which division it should be located in. We produced a report which you have in front of you structured into three parts: findings, conclusions and recommendations. And I would just like to give a brief summary and then answer any questions that you may have. First of all, we believe that the proposal that is in front of the Board is reasonable and we are supportive of that proposal. We noted that Operations, Maintenance, Engineering and MIS had a consensus on the need for this group and the fact that is necessary in order to support the objectives of the Districts. In particular, there is a need for resources to focus on common architectures, standards and consistency for the implantation of systems. And where as to date there haven't been resources focused on these items. I think the recent augmentation of the J-31 Contract is a step in the right direction there. In particular, there are three concerns which I would highlight now. One was the concern of assigning all of the resources to a single group, and the questions as to whether there might be isolation incurred by doing so. Secondly, there was the location of the group, where it should fit. And finally the staffing levels and skills sets that where required. Addressing the first item, and the concern about creating a group which would possibly lead to isolation. It was noticeable that first of all the group was going to be headed up by an individual from Engineering. The group would be supported by Maintenance for a transition period of 11/2 to 2 years while the new systems were being put in place. And there would be a rotating person, well, a person on a rotating basis, from Operations as a project specialist as part of this group, so we felt that it actually had fingers going out into the rest of the organization. Further, there is a user group that is being established, or has been established, and it has met a few times now, and that whole process will help it retain its customer focus throughout its life. In terms of where it should reside, there were a variety of opinions, but without a doubt everybody agreed that MIS has a reputation for being customer focused and a good reputation for delivery. Further, the MIS organization has the management skills to manage both projects that have a life cycle to them - they begin, they progress and then they stop, and on going processes such as maintenance. And MIS is actually unique in that instance. So based on that, we thought that MIS was a good place to put this group and to nurture it while it grows. In terms of staffing and skill levels, we thought that the staffing levels were reasonable in light of the fact that Maintenance will continue to provide support during the transition period of about 18 months to two years, and that the staffing level should be reviewed after that period. It will be necessary to go outside to hire some experience in a particular programming language which is necessary, but other than that there is one individual from Maintenance who will be transferring over, and there the person who would be heading up the unit is identified too. Final comment is that it was our opinion that the composition of the group, the attitude of the people that we interviewed and the customer focus of the MIS group would lead to a much more cooperative stance and, in fact, would encourage a concurrent engineering approach whereby people from Engineering, Maintenance and Operations would, in fact, be involved in early design decisions rather than waiting until a product was actually delivered before getting their opinions. So that is basically the summary. If there are any questions, I would be happy to answer them. Steiner: Hasn't that function always been T Kyle: It is varied. Our understanding is that there was a survey done of a number of organizations and there is no real consistency as to where it would be placed. Engineering has some advantages in that some aspects of this job are pure engineering tasks. The Process Control Logic is an engineering task, that is for sure. The focus of this group for the first period is going to be on more architectural aspects, computer systems architectures, so that all of these systems will eventually talk to each other and the standards will be in place and so on. We feel that is the focus and there is a great synergy between the skill sets that currently exist in MIS and the support of this particular aspect of the task. Mahoney: You obviously have a copy of the staff recommendations. Can you tell me what changes in this report, or are there any changes in this report, from what the staff has recommended, or do you pretty much go along with what the staff recommended? Kyle: We go along with what the staff recommended with the note that there is an expectation that Maintenance will be providing support for a transition period. Steiner: Did staff agree to this? Kyle: I would say that in addressing the requirement, it is interesting that people looked at it from their own perspectives. So they saw the importance, for example, in Engineering of the Process Control Logic. In Maintenance, they saw the importance of being able to quickly maintain and get changes into the system. From Systems' point of view, they saw the importance of the architectures. So there was a difference in emphasis from each of those, but certainly the leadership of each of the divisions were in consensus or in agreement. JC: Anyone else? Alright, thank you, Norm. I appreciate your report. With that if there are no other questions we need a motion on Item 11 lb)(2)(a)and lb). Yes, Director Mahoney. Mahoney: Mr. Chairman, thank you. Mr. Chairman, I sat in on the meetings, the Executive Committee meetings, where staff presented, and I think very thoroughly, presented what they were going to do. And we paid $25,000.00,1 think we all know that, for this report from Ernst & Young, and they didn't recommend anything different from what our staff had recommended. What I would like to say is that we seem to be in a posture here where our staff can't seem to do anything without going to a consultant and paying a lot of money for them to give a blessing for what our staff is saying. So I would like us to rethink, and maybe the Sub Committee is the one to do this. The Sub Committee recommended spending $25,000.00to do this report with the blessing of the Executive Committee. My concern is, I stated it then and I voted against it, I _ because this is the ultimate outcome of what staff recommended in the first place. But I would like the Sub Committee and the Board to consider the fact that we need to get on with this mindset that every time we want to do something, we have to put out money and hire a consultant. So with that, Mr. Chairman, I'm going to vote for it but I needed to make that statement. JC: Yes, thank you very much. I know you have some partners in that view so thank you for stating it. Item 11(b)(4) - Restructuring of the Board Committees JC: This has been discussed by the Vice Joint Chairman, myself and the Executive Committee. Just to give you heads up on some of the background in this, we made the observation that we have had a lot of new Directors coming on this Board in this past year and more to come this coming year, as some of you may be moving on to other endeavors. We have had a variety of committees serving the Board, but primarily one or two spends monthly activity in really tracking what is going on in the organization and that accounts for 12 to 15 members. Approximately 30 members don't get the benefit of additional insights as to what is going on and education that those 12 to 15 do. As you know, we have some 42 members on the Board, and so this restructuring allows us to deal with the business at hand. (1) On Operations so that we are tracking our Operating activities through a committee; (2) Through what has been Fiscal Policy would now be Finance and Personnel; and (3) Engineering, and we have had a lot of Engineering issues that have come before us in recent years and many more to come. So it was felt that these three committees would involve more Directors and get us more closely involved in the day to day activities of the operations of the Districts. Still we have the Executive Committee that remains intact, but we also proposed a Steering Committee which is made up of the Chairs of the various sub Committees to meet as needed to deal with issues that come up from time to time. On other Boards that I have sat on, and I know many of you have sat on, when you have large Boards, there is a need to have a Steering Committee that you can call on in an immediate notice if you need to address some issues. So that's the proposal before you. It has been approved by the Executive Committee,and it is recommended that (4)(a) and (b) be approved by the Districts. Any questions? We have a motion and a second. Any opposition. Okay, lets consider that unanimous. Let me do one other thing on this subject. I wanted to get first your approval. Have you seen the back of this report? It was the tentative Committee assignments, and what I did was I went through the list of all of you that have served on Committees that related to the Operations, Engineering or Finance and Personnel and try to allocate you in an equitable fashion as possible to these three Committees. As you will note, there are 15 or 16 of you on each one of these Sub Committees. I have also looked at the resumes that we had on hand so that we could try to match up some of your experiences with the activities of these Committees. So this is what I am recommending. There may be some changes for some of you. If you have a lot heartburn about it, you can talk to me about it and maybe we can do some swapping. I also will point out that there will be some changes by the end of the year, as some of you are going off your respective Councils, and so there will be some opportunities there at the end of the year or early next year to do some adjustments also. So this is what we are proposing for now, and unless there is a lot of heartburn, I would like to move forward with this because we do have these meetings coming up in October, and as I say, if you have concerns, talk to me personally and we will see what we can do to make some adjustments. Now, on top of that, what we are also proposing is that for the first time on these committees we have both a chair and a vice-chair. Historically, we have only had the one position, but we have felt its valuable, as we try to create some kind of succession process here, that we have both a chair and vice-chair. Once again, to get this off of the ground, many of you have spoken to me about your interest in participating in the programs more actively and so to start this out through now until at least the end of the year and we see where we come out in January, I would like to propose that these following people be designated in these positions: Operations Committee- Pat McGuigan, Chair; Victor Leipzig, Vice Chair Engineering Committee - John Collins, Chair; Jim Warmer, Vice Chair Finance & Personnel Committee - Peer Swan, Chair; Roger Stanton, Vice Chair I think that takes care of these issues, but associated with this subject, I would like to request that we have a Steering Committee Meeting on Thursday, September 29th at 5:30 p.m., and both the Chairs and Vice Chairs would attend this meeting. Typically, the Chairs would be part of the Steering Committee only, but in this particular instance, I think it would be valuable to have both Chairs and Vice Chairs participate so that we can begin to dialogue on what these new Committee structures are going to be all about. Yes, Director Catlin. Catlin: Mr. Chairman, I would like to commend you for putting this . This is definitely adding leadership to JC: Thank you, Buck. Any other comments, questions? Victor. Leipzig: What was the Steering Committee date? JC: September 29th, Thursday at 5:30 p.m. I am sure a light meal will be served. ?: Does the October dates then supersede the notice attached to the agenda? Will we finish up with the existing committees in September? JC: They should coincide. The October meetings, I think I said, start...did I get your question right? Any other questions? COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 2, 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON SEPTEMBER 14, 1994 gtTAT/GN G "Is OA'9pGE COV" ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular Meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,3. 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,was held on September 14, 1994, at 7:30 p.m.,in the Disoitts'Administrative Offices. Following me Pledge of Allegia oo and invocation the roll was celled and the Sek MUN reported a quorum present for Distrim Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: A Fred Banera.Chair Gene Beyer • x James M.Ferryman,Clair We hem Nate Reads _L Pat McGuigan Thomas E.Ill Roger Stanton William G.Steiner :v Tmpy A.Worley Thomas R.Selurelli DISTRICT NO.2: _3_ John Collins,Clair Getem. Scott a Iry Fackler,Chair we tam Tom Daly Fred Banere Gene Beyer Buck Catlin Chile Noft Berry Ganes Bob Bell • Norman Z.Eckemode Michael Maerr:weiler 1_ William D.Mahoney James H.Fora Caney J.Nelson Glenn Porker Miguel Pulido Thomas L LW Roger Stanton William G.Steiner y Daniel T.Won _ John M.Gulllxson George L Maket Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO.3: _y_ Sal A.Sapien,Clair William C.Easeda Bemis D trip"Clair pro tem ,x Carley J.Nos. Gratim Brown Frank lase, Buck Catlin Chris N.My John Collins George Scan i James H.Floe William D.Mahoney x Dan R.Griffin Mmald Bore Wally Linn Eva G.Miner 3_ The.E. Lm Pot McClWoan Onda Mouhon4saneraon Earle Robnaille Mclard Ponin Joyce C.Nicholson i Iry Fackler Tom Daly • Margie L Rice James V.&am • Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket ,• _ Roper Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner Charles SyNa Amhe" Sefvaggi DISTRICT NO.5: Phil Sensors, Chair Jan Debay x Willem G.Steiner,Chair pro lem Roper Stanton y_ Jonn C.Co.,Jr. _ Jan Debay DISTRICT NO.6: x James A.Wapner, Chair Anna Pony Evelyn Hart,Craig pro tam Joni C.Cox.Jr. William G.Steiner _ Roper Stamon DISTRICT NO.7: a Barry Hammond.Chair Mike Ward i Thomas R. Simonelli.Chair pro tom _ Jim Potts y Fred Barrere _ Gem Beyer k Jan Delay _ Phil Sansone Ted Moreno _ Mi9m1 Pulido William G.Steiner Roger Stamon James A.Wapner Mike Scheafer DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Wnchell, Chair Earle RMitaille x Victor Le Ming,Chair pro tam Linda MounonPatterson Roper Stanton William G. Steimr DWRICT NO.13: John M.Gulihhson, Chair Daniel T.Welch Glenn Poker.Chair pro hem Bumie Dunap y_ Fred Banera _ Gem Beyer • Iry Romer Tom Daly William G.Steiner Roper Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: Peer A.Swan,Chair Darryl Miller a Bony Hammond,Chair pro lean _ Mike Ward i Fred Barters _ Gene Beyer x Jim Pons Tracy A.War" welg6m G.Steiner Roper Stanton -2- 09/14/94 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Blake P. Anderson, Margie Nellor, Gary G. Streed, Catherine Biele, Chris Cervellone, Don Crapnell, Mark Esquer, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, John Linder, Stuart Severn, Ed .� Torres, Chuck Winsor, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Jamel Demir, Bill Knopf, Norm Kyle, Phil Stone ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair welcomed alternate Director Presentation of Districts' pin to Director Earle Robitaille from the City of Huntington Beach and presented him with a pin bearing the Districts' logo. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chair Cox presented a plaque to former Recognition of former Joint Chair Joint Chair William Mahoney expressing the Mahoney Boards' appreciation for his services and outstanding contribution during his term as Joint Chair from July 1991 to July 1994. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager commented on the Presentation of staff memento of committment and vast amount of time and effort appreciation to former Joint Chair the Joint Chair expends working with directors Mahoney and staff on District matters throughout the year. As a token of his appreciation, and that of the staff, he presented a memento expressing staff's appreciation and thanks to the outgoing Joint Chair, William Mahoney, for his assistance, support and leadership. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chair announced the tentatively Report of the Joint Chair scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Fiscal Policy Committee- Wednesday, September 21st, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Subcommittee- Wednesday, September 28th,at 4:30 p.m. Executive Committee- Wednesday, September 28th, at 5:30 p.m. Joint Works Selection Committee- Wednesday, September 28th (immediately following the Executive Committee meeting) Operations Committee- Wednesday, October 5th, at 5:30 p.m. Engineering and Construction Committee- Thursday, October 6th, at 5:30 p.m. -3- 09/14/94 DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1994,the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meetings held July 13, 1994, and August 10, 1994,the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1994, the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1994,the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -4- 09/14/94 DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1994,the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held August 10, 1994,the Chair ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A", "B", "C" and "D" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 07/13194 07/27/94 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 365.28 5,504.28 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 46,671.47 4,688.58 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,873.21 0.00 S49,909.96 510.192.66 08/10/94 08/24/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 609,456.07 S 962,778.97 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1 ,347,279.01 844,812.31 Joint Working Capital Fund - 552,949.87 425,160.71 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 10,639.29 4,535.83 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 7,361 .32 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 24,167.94 3,887.32 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 41,101.17 108,687.32 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 4,869.90 43,580.88 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 7,333.14 0.00 DISTRICT N0. 7 - 19,762.32 60,615.33 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 15,759.81 233,392.70 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 101.72 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 11,401.48 1,101,579.32 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 0.00 3,900.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 0.00 124,892.18 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 2,428.99 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 345.58 7,051.06 52.652.528.62 83.927.302.92 -5- 09/14/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt No. C-034,to FMC Corporation Resolution No. 94-104,receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification No. C-034, to FMC Corporation, for a unit delivered price of $2.090 per gallon, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning October 1, 1994,with provision for two one-year extensions (estimated annual cost $940,500.00plus sales tax). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to J.G. Tucker & Son. Inc. for That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Purchase of Portable Gas Detectors a purchase order to J.G. Tucker & Son, Inc., in (Specification No. E-247) the amount of $52,180.00,plus sales tax, for Purchase of Portable Gas Detectors (Specification No. E-247). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to PacTel Meridian Systems for That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Amendment No. 3 to the Telephone a purchase order to PacTel Meridian Systems for System Maintenance Agreement for Amendment No. 3 to the Telephone System the Districts' telephone PBX and related Maintenance Agreement for the Districts' equipment (Specification No. S-060 telephone PBX and related equipment (Specification No. S-060), to extend said agreement for a twelve-month period from August 22, 1994 to August 21, 1994, for an amount not to exceed $33,048.00 for existing equipment. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1 Approving Change Order No. 6 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-53-1 That Change Order No. 6 to the plans and specifications for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1 , authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $35,000.00 from the contract with Amelco Construction, a Division of Amelco Industries, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Job No. P2-53-1 as Moved, seconded and duly carried: complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-105,accepting Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -6- 09/14/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Summons and Complaint Westside Building Material Corp. vs. That the Summons and Complaint, Westside County Sanitation Districts of Orange Building Material Corp. vs. County Sanitation County and Javaid Contractors, Inc.. Districts of Orange County and Javaid Orange County Superior Court Case Contractors, Inc., Orange County Superior Court No. 735140 Case No. 735140, relative to a stop notice filed ' by a subcontractor against Districts' contractor, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Special Joint Works Selection Committee That the draft minutes of the Special Joint re Computers Works Selection Committee re Computers meeting held on August 17, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. Directors Roger R. Stanton and William Steiner requested that their abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Executive Subcommittee That the draft minutes of the Executive Subcommittee meeting held on August 24, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as amended. Directors Roger R. Stanton and William Steiner requested that their abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Vice Joint Chair Swan requested that the draft Receive and file draft minutes of the minutes of the Executive Committee be Executive Committee corrected to reflect his attendance. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the draft minutes of the Executive Committee meeting held on August 25, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as corrected. Directors Roger R. Stanton and William Steiner requested that their abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -7- 09/14/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Square D Company for Factory That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Configuration and Testing of CRISP/32 a purchase order to Square D Company for Software and DEC Hardware for Plants 1 Factory Configuration and Testing of CRISP/32 and 2 (Specification No. E-246-1) Software and DEC Hardware for Plants 1 and 2 (Specification No. E-246-1),for an amount not to exceed $84,824.00 plus applicable taxes, in accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement dated July 13, 1994 with Square D Company. ALL DISTRICTS In response to a question about whether the Approving Addendum No. 3 to the proposed additional work should go back out for Professional Services Agreement with bidding because of the amount of the proposed CH2M Hill for design and programming addendum, General Counsel stated that there is services required for Job No. J-31 no requirement to do so, it would be strictly a policy decision to be made by the Directors. The Director of Engineering also stated that the work in the proposal is a follow on to work that was initiated with CH2M Hill. The addendum was discussed at length at the Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers and it was staff's recommendation to approve Addendum No. 3 with CH2M Hill because they have been working on the project for almost a year, going through a long learning curve, and on the basis of the recommendation to make a major change in the direction of plant automation, it is believed that they are the logical choice. He also stated that the costs were in line for the level of effort that is going to be required for the proposed work. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-106,approving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Ch2M Hill for design and programming services required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31 , providing for additional design, software integration and standards development services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $532,300.00for traditional engineering services, and $785,900.00for software integration services, increasing the total authorized compensation from $742,148.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,060,348.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director William Steiner requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoprovina the acquisition and use of standardized Programmable Logic That the acquisition and use of standardized Computers manufactured by Modicon Programmable Logic Computers manufactured by Modicon, for use throughout the treatment plant and collection system facilities for computerized automation, be, and is hereby, approved. -8- 09/14/94 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to formation of Plant Automation Group Verbal report of Ernst & Young The Joint Chair reported that Ernst & Young had been engaged to review the recommendations of staff pertaining to the proposed formation of a Plant Automation Group. The Joint Chair then introduced Norm Kyle of Ernst & Young who gave a brief overview of their report that was included in the Directors' meeting folders that evening with regard to the formation of the Plant Automation Group. Mr. Kyle advised the Directors that Ernst & Young reviewed the need for the group, staffing levels and skill sets, and whether it should be a single group and where it should be located in the organization, and is in agreement with staff's recommendations relative to the formation of the Plant Automation Group. Mr. Kyle then briefly reviewed the report and underscored the proposed interaction of the Management Information Services, Operations, Maintenance and Engineering groups to the success of the Plant Automation Group mission. The consultant then answered questions pertaining to the organizational placement of the Plant Automation Group and staff acceptance of the proposal, and whether there were any suggested changes to the staff recommendations. Director Mahoney expressed his concern that the Boards seemed to want to hire consultants, at considerable expense, to review staff's recommendations and, in this example, the consultant confirmed what staff has already recommended. He asked that the Executive Subcommittee be requested to rethink the advisability of this practice. Amending Classification and Moved, seconded and duly carried: Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as recommended. That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt relative to the formation of Plant Resolution No. 94-107,amending Classification Automation Group and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, adding one Systems Engineer ($4495- $6360), one Programmer/Analyst($3700-$5235)and one Programmer ($3195- $4525)to the Information Services Division, and deleting one Engineer ($4495 - $6360)from the Engineering Department, Planning and Design Division. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Annrovirlg Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Ernst & Youna for review of Districts' Resolution No. 94-108,approving Addendum Capital Projects Management Function No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement ' with Ernst & Young to conduct a two-phase, independent review of the Districts' Capital Projects Management Function, including current Districts' organizational structure and management practices, providing for addition of Phase 3, Task 4, Evaluation of Human Resources Function, for an amount not to exceed $60,000.00,increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $235,000.00to an amount not to exceed $295,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -9- 09/14/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chair Cox referred Directors to the Actions relative to Boards' Committee memorandum from he and the Vice Joint Chair, Restructuring and the recommendation from the Executive Committee,to restructure the Board Committees. He observed that the Boards had experienced considerable turnover in the past year and would again in the coming year. There has been a variety of committees serving the Boards, but most of the work has been focused in a few committees with a core of 12-15 Directors really tracking what is going on in the organization, with other Directors not benefitting from the insights derived from Committee work. Participation of Directors in one of the three new Committees, Operations, Engineering & Construction and Finance & Personnel, will involve more Directors in the day to day activities of the Districts' operations. The Executive Committee will remain intact and there will be a new Steering Committee of standing committee chairs that will meet as needed to deal with issues that arise from time to time. Joint Chair Cox then reviewed the proposed Committee assignments and announced the following Chairs and Vice Chairs of the restructured committees: Operations Committee- Pat McGuigan, Chair; Victor Leipzig, Vice Chair Engineering & Construction Committee- John Collins, Chair; Jim Wahner, Vice Chair Finance & Personnel Committee- Peer Swan, Chair; Roger Stanton, Vice Chair The Joint Chair then announced that the Steering Committee would meet on Thursday, September 29th, at 5:30 p.m., and the Chairs and Vice Chairs of these committees were asked to attend to discuss the new committee structure. Amending Resolution No. 87-51, Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishing Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business of the That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Districts, re restructuring of the Resolution No. 94-109,amending Resolution Boards' committees No. 87-51, Establishing Rules of Procedure for the Conduct of Business of the Districts, relative to restructuring of the Boards' committees. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -10- 09/14/94 Amending Resolution No 90-43. Moved, seconded and duly carried: Establishina Policies and procedures for the Selection and That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Procurement of Professional Resolution No. 94-110,amending Resolution Engineering. Architectural. No. 90-43, Establishing Policies and Procedures Environmental. Land Surveying and for the Selection and Procurement of Construction Management Professional Engineering, Architectural, Services, re transferring Joint Environmental, Land Surveying and Construction Works Selection Committee Management Services, relative to transferring responsibilities for selectina Joint Works Selection Commiittee responsibilities professional services consultants for selecting professional services consultants to to the appropriate new standina the appropriate new standing committee of the committee of the Boards Boards. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Moved, seconded and duly carried: ALL DISTRICTS That the draft minutes of the Joint Works Receive and file draft minutes of the Joint Selection Committee meeting held on August 25, Works Selection Committee 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee certification of Black & Veatch re Job No. P1-46 the fine negotiated fee relative to Addendum and Job No. P2.55 No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch for engineering evaluation and design and construction support services required for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55, providing for additional engineering design services pertaining to chemical feed facilities modifications, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-111, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Black & Veatch for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit for an additional amount not to exceed $11,100.00,increasing the total authorized compensation from $379,715.00to an amount not to exceed $390,815.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. _t1_ 09/14/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Annroving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee certification of the James M. Montgomery Consulting final negotiated fee relative to Addendum No. 1 Engineers. Inc. re preparation of to the Professional Services Agreement with emissions inventory report and health risk James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers, assessment report to comply with Inc. for preparation of emissions inventory report AS 2588 and health risk assessment report in order to comply with AB 2588, California Air Toxic "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987, providing for a name change to Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc., and providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-112, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Montgomery Watson Americas, Inc., providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $398,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors the General Counsel's Comments Prior to need for a closed session as authorized by Closed Session Government Code Section 54956.9,54957 and 54957.6 to discuss and consider the items that are specified as Item 16(b)(1), (2), (3), (4) and (5) on the published Agenda. General Counsel also indicated a need to add two items needing immediate action, and the need for said actions came to the attention of General Counsel subsequent to the posting of the Agenda. He reported that additional items could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b)upon a two-thirds vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Add Items to the Closed Session Agenda That Item 16(b)(6) be added to the Agenda to consider a report from General Counsel in connection with litigation entitled County Sanitation Districts of Orange County v. Cooper Industries, Inc., at al., USDC Case No. SACV92-89-LTL:and, FURTHER MOVED: That Item 16(b)(7) be added to the Agenda to consider a report from General Counsel in connection with pending litigation, Harinder Grewal v. City of Anaheim, at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732308,relative to landslide liability. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9. The Boards convened in closed session at 54957 and 54957.E 8:13 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9. 54957 and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and -12- 09/14/94 Committee Closed Meetings. A report of actions taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re: Agenda Item (16)(b)(2), (5) and (6). No actions were taken re Agenda Items (16)(b)(1)(b)(2)and (4). ALL DISTRICTS At 9:20 p.m. the Boards reconvened in regular Reconvene in regular session session. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approval of Memorandum of Understanding with Operations and That the Memorandum of Understanding with Maintenance Employees. IUOE Local 501 the Districts' Operations and Maintenance Employees, represented by the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 501, for the period November 26, 1993 through November 21, 1996, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager and Personnel Director, be, and are hereby, authorized to execute said Memorandum of Understanding. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizino Chance Order No. 3 to Purchase Order No. 54292 issued to That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue David R. Griffin. Attorney at Law. and/or Change Order No. 3 to Purchase Order his firm Byrum. Holland & Griffin for No. 54292 issued to David R. Griffin, Attorney special counsel legal fees re: Litiaation at Law, and/or his firm Byrum, Holland & Griffin, for recovery of District damages - increasing the authorized amount from an County Sanitation District No. 3 v. amount not to exceed $235,000.00to an Amoco, Inc. and United Technology amount not to exceed $385,000.00for special Corporation, at al. counsel legal fees re: Litigation for recovery of District damages- County Sanitation District No. 3 v. Amoco, Inc. and United Technology Corporation, at al. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing General Counsel to defend District's interests re Summons and That the District's General Counsel be, and is Complaint. Harinder Grewal v. City of hereby, authorized to represent and defend the Anaheim, at al.. Orange County Superior interests of the District relative to Summons and Court Case No. 732308 re Anaheim Hills Complaint, Harinder Grewal v. City of Anaheim, landslide at al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 732308. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. ' DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Selection Committee That the draft minutes of the Selection Committee meeting held on August 16, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. -13- 09/1 4f94 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver for That the Selection Committee certification of preparation of Project Report re Contract the final negotiated fee relative to the No. 2-14-5R2 Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver for preparation of a Project Report re Santa Ana River Interceptor Manhole Erosion Protection and Access Roads, Contract No. 2-14-5R2, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-114-2, approving said agreement with Holmes & Narver for said services on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $376,729.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Contract That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and No. 11-17-1 specifications for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1, authorizing an addition of 320,988.00to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons, for five items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 14 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file draft minutes of the Selection Committee That the draft minutes of the Selection Committee meeting held on August 17, 1994, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee certification of DGA Consultants. Inc. re Contract the final negotiated fee relative to Addendum Nos. 3-35R and 3-11 R No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. for permitting, design and construction services for Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Orangethorpe Avenue to Ellis Avenue, Contract No. 3-35R,and Seal Beach Boulevard Interceptor Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation, between Westminster Boulevard and 405 Freeway, Contract No. 3-11 R, providing for additional design services, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, -14- 09/14/94 FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-115-3, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with DGA Consultants, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $13.450.00,increasing the total authorized compensation from $207,000.00to an amount not to exceed $220,450.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Newport Beach re That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Contract No. 5-37-3 Resolution No. 94-116,approving Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Newport Beach providing for reimbursement of costs to the Districts for City's sewer facilities to be constructed in connection with Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3,in form approved by General Counsel. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Gravity Sewer. Phase 3. Contract Resolution No. 94-117,approving plans and No. 5-37-3 specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-37-3,and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Actions re Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer. between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive. Contract No. 5-37-4 Approving Change Order No. 2 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the Plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-37-4 That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of 5118,439.00to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc., dba Colich & Sons, for one item of added work, and granting a time extension of 57 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -15- 09/14/94 Aoorovina Change Order No. 3 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-37-4 That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an adjustment of engineer's quantities for a total deduction of $61,158.36 from the contract with Colich Bros., Inc., dba Colich & Sons, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Contract No. 5-37-4 Moved, seconded and duly carried: as complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-101,accepting Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4,as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Adjustment of Shares of Various Districts of the Cost of Certain That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Improvements to Joint Facilities Resolution No. 94-95-6,approving Adjustment Pertaining to 1990-92 Series "C" of Shares of Various Districts of the Cost of Certificates of Participation Certain Improvements to Joint Facilities Pertaining to 1990-92 Series "C" Certificates of Participation. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoorovina Reimbursement Agreement with the County of Orange Environmental That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Manaaement Agency re Contract Resolution No. 94-118-7,approving No. 7-22 Reimbursement Agreement with the County of Orange Environmental Management Agency, providing for reimbursement of costs to the District to include certain road resurfacing and widening work in connection with construction of Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk Sewer, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -16- 09/14/94 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request for annexation and authorizing initiation of oroceedinas That the request from Leason F. Pomeroy, III, re proposed Annexation No. 144- and Dr. William H. Metzger for annexation of Pomeroy Annexation 1.44 acres of territory to the District, in the vicinity north of the intersection of Lemon Heights Drive and Foothill Boulevard in unincorporated county territory, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, - FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-119-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 144 - Pomeroy Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chair then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. Assistant Sec ry of a Boards of Directors ' Of County Sai ' ation tricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -17- FUND NO 9199 - JT D,IST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7107194 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 07113894 POSTING DATE 07113(94 SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPER FUND $764.62 02 OPER FUND 5.972.39 02 CAP FAC FUND 4.362.58 03 OPER FUND 39.245.29 03 CAP FAC FUND 338.71 05 OPER FUND 3.187.14 05 CAP FAC FUND 185,511.25 06 OPER FUND 365.28_� 07 OPER R 6,033.84 07 CAP FAC FUND 1.971.86 011 OPEN FUND 7,175.94 011 CAP FAC FUND 4.571.47 013 OPER FUND 34.11 014 OPER FUND 71.86 014 CAP FAC FUND 7.186.71 0586 OPER FUND 2.341 3 m 0588 CAP FAC FUND 44,326.44 = 06870PERFUND 2873, 07814 0PER FUND 4,692.51 JT OPER FUND 697,627.92 -1 CORF 1,588,870.17 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 27,604.74 y IT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 195,793.06 $49,909.96 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 7/20/94 PAGE 06 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0727/94 POSTING DATE 0T27/94 WARRANT NO, VENDOR AMOUNT 139202 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $156.41 PARCEL SERVICES 139203 UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. $4.783.61 TECHITE CLAIM DOCUMENT COSTS 139204 VWR SCIENTIFIC $467.20 LAB SUPPLIES 139205 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $602.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139205 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 51,296.22 LAB SUPPLIES 139207 VERNE'S PLUMBING $525.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 139208 VILLAGE NURSERIES $228.35 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 139209 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $10.985.91 CHEMICALS 139210 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $2.057.64 CAUSTIC S0DA M.O.8-12-92 139211 WEST-LTTE SUPPLY CO. $325.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139212 XEROX CORP. $1.860.37 COPIER LEASES 139213 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $1.389.08 LAB SUPPLIES 139214 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS $3,222.44 INSTRUMENTS 139215 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $92.92 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139216 ZYMARK CORP. $20.001.50 LAB EQUIPMENT 53,784,331.22 R1 SUMMARY AMOUNT X 2 Y2 OPER FUND 47.03 to92 CAP FAC FUND 47.5050 93 0PER FUND 2.116.80 63 CAP FAC FUND 16,674.73 Dy #6 OPER FUND 24.23 95 CAP FAC FUND 93,567.49 L MWFALFIN sM38—] —ZOPERFUND 115.69 M7 CAP FAC FUND 7,370AS *11 OPER FUND 15.56 011 CAP FAC FUND 515.490.76 914 CAP FAC FUND 274.1349 8588 CAP FAC FUND 4,6A 6.58 1 07814 OPER FUND 12.85 JT OPER FUND 967.606.65 / CORE 651.636.39 }� SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 46,026.65 W JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 199,052.36 a $10,192.86 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8103/94 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08110/94 POSTING DATE 08110194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139240 AG TECH COMPANY $60,725.35 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9.91 139241 AT&T $971.46 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 139242 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP. $147.60 DOOR REPAIRS 139243 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $1,223.16 LAB SUPPLIES 139244 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS,INC. $279,554.93 CONSTRUCTION P1-36-1 139245 AIR UQUIDE AMERICA CORP. $1,624.39 SPECIALTY GASES 139246 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $6,46 LAB SUPPLIES 139247 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS,INC. $17.788.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-M9 139240 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $26.23 ASPHALT 139249 ALLWASTE SERVICES $1,713.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 139250 AMERICAN HI-LIFT $99.27 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 139251 ANAHEIM SAW SHOP,INC. $89.47 TOOL REPAIRS 139252 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $519.92 LAB SUPPLIES 139253 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $3.186.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139254 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $270.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139255 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $287.12 NOTICES&ADS 139256 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $14,095.65 LAB SERVICES 139257 AQUATIC CENTER $40.00 AIR BOTTLES m 139258 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $518.68 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES X 139259 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $35.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 2 139261 ASSOC. CONSULTANTS $633.62 INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS � 139267 RANOOLPH AUSTIN CO. $633.62 LAB SUPPLIES y 139262 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. $193.00 BUILDING REPAIRS t1 139263 AVNET COMPUTER $24,180.64 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139264 AWARDS&TROPHIES $78.08 PLAQUES H 139265 BKK LANDFILL 52,877.73 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 139266 BRW SAFETY&SUPPLY $333.54 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139267 BARTON SALES COMPANY ITT $4,925.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139268 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $2,265.60 BATTERIES 139269 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $5.771.89 LAB SUPPLIES 139270 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $533.45 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 139271 VIT BILLARD $213.14 BUILDING REPAIRS 139272 BIOMERIEUX VITEK,INC. $442.67 LAB SUPPLIES 139273 BIO TECH NET,INC. $66.10 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139274 BLACK&VEATCH $331.97 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-25.1 139276 BLACK BOX CORP. $417.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139275 BOOT BARN $256.59 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 139277 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $18,748.12 ENGINEERING SERVICES 6-13,338 139278 BROWN&CALDWELL CONSULTANTS $37,462.52 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 93-101,J-19 139279 BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $1,064.09 PROFESSIONAL JOURNAL 139280 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $181.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139201 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $11.638.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10.92 139202 BUY-CHEM DISTRIBUTORS $1,435.23 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139283 C.P.I. $857.23 LAB SUPPLIES 139204 CRC PRESS,INC. $187.45 LAB SUPPLIES 1392116 CS COMPANY $3,813.76 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8I03/94 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF nRANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O8/10/94 POSTING DATE 08/10/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 139286 CADIRECTOIN $5.245.50 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 139287 CADVENTURES $1.109.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES 139288 DARREL CONDON&ASSOCIATES $3.500.00 CONSULTING SERVICES,EXEC SUB COMM 139289 CALTROL,INC. $73.70 HARDWARE 139290 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $33.470.99 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-36 139291 CASHCO $1.433.68 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139292 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $6.508.16 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139293 CHEM SEARCH $1.713.40 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139294 COAST RUBBER STAMP $54.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139296 COLORADO MEMORY SYSTEMS $58.97 COMPUTER PARTS 139296 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,444.93 ENGINE PARTS 139297 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. 521.23 TRUCK PARTS 139298 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2,644.33 ELECTRIC PARTS 139299 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $2,230.43 CHLORINE M.O.10.11-93 139300 CONTROL CABLES,INC. $128.91 TRUCK PARTS 139301 CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY $563.34 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139302 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $2.923.77 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.8-11-93 fTl 139303 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $261,280.00 ENGINE PARTS X 139304 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.589.10 ELECTRIC PARTS = 139305 T.H.CREEARS CORP. $984.37 METER 139306 DME,INC. $77.35 COMPRESSOR PARTS 139307 DANIEL FLOW PRODUCTS $475.86 PLUMBING SUPPLIES -� 139308 DAPPER TIRE $375.00 TRUCK PARTS 139309 HSK/DECKER $348.77 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139310 DELTA MOTOR CO. $3.860.75 MOTOR REPAIRS N 139311 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $6.258.89 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-11-93 139312 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $2.089.71 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139313 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $225.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL M.0.1-13-92 139314 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $160.0n ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 139315 ARNIDUNN,MFCC $540.00 EAP COUNSELING SERVICES 139316 ESP NORTH $380.45 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139317 EASTMAN.INC. $4.006.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139318 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWARE $73.15 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 139319 ENCHANTER,INC. $5,040.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6.10.92 139320 ENERGY CONTAINER CORP. $993.96 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 139321 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $707.30 LAB SERVICES 139322 ANGUS ELECTRONICS CO. $118.62 CHART PAPER 139323 FLUID TECH.SALES $603.40 METER 139324 MARSHALL FAIRRES $78.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 139325 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5,993.76 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-Ml 139326 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $143.25 AIR FREIGHT 139327 FILTERLINE CORP. $516.40 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 139328 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $84.13 LAB SUPPLIES 139329 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $41,570.21 LAB EQUIPMENT 139330 FLAT&VERTICAL,INC. $143.50 CONCRETE CUTTING 139331 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $383.12 PHOTO SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DOT WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/03194 PAGEID3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANRATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O8110194 POSTING DATE 08I10/84 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 139332 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $29.399.76 WATER USE 139333 FREEDOM IMAGING $154.01 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139334 CITY OF FULLERTON $277.22 WATER USE 139335 GST,INC. $503.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139336 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $3,255.49 LUMBERHAROWARE 139337 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1,201.95 CHEMICALS 139338 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $6,121.50 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139339 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,018.37 TELEPHONE SERVICES 139340 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $19.491.57 MECHANICAL PARTS 139341 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $598.01 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 139342 GRASSY S.T.I. $7.541.78 ENGINE PARTS 139343 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $531.48 PRINTING 139344 GREAT PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. $629.68 MACHINE REPAIRS 139345 DGA CONSULTANTS $9,600.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 139346 GEORGE T.HALL CO. $219.65 ELECTRIC PARTS 139347 FREDA HARPER $1,500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 139348 PL HAWN CO.,INC. $314.41 FILTERS nT 139349 HAZCO SERVICES,INC. $244.07 BASIN PARTS x 139350 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 2 139351 HEWLETT PACKARD $313.57 LAB SUPPLIES 139352 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $39.54 COMPRESSOR PARTS 139353 RC HOFFMAN ANDIOR ISCO $40.502.15 LAB SUPPLIES —I 139364 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $75.737.21 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-44 139355 HOME DEPOT $1,239.60 HARDWARE n 139356 IRS HUGHES CO.INC. $44428 PAINT SUPPLIES W 139357 ORANGE COUNTY FED CREDIT UNION $680.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 139368 IDEKX $408.43 LAB SUPPLIES 139359 IMAGING PLUS $388.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139360 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1,120.06 CONNECTORS 139361 ISI INFORTEXT $1.341.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139362 INGRAM PAPER $196.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139363 INORGANIC VENTURES $561.80 LAB SUPPLIES 139364 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES $348.00 SERVICEAGREEMENT 139365 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $683.57 BATTERIES 139366 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $108.20 WATER USE 139367 ISCO,INC. $476.29 INSTRUMENT 139368 J&W SCIEMIFIC $120.37 METER 139369 JAMISON ENGINEERING $10,455.23 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 139370 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $809.91 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139371 JAVID CONTRACTORS,INC. $24,443.14 CONSTRUCTION P2-23-5-1 139372 JAYS CATERING $161.79 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 139373 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $590.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139374 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $125.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 139376 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $233.52 ELECTRIC PARTS 139376 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $942.33 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139377 KAMAN BEARINGS&SUPPLY $231.46 MACHINE SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/03194 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/10/94 POSTING DATE O811001 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 139378 KART ADVANCED MATERIALS,INC. $4,995.00 MACHINE TESTING 139379 THE KEITH COMPANIES $972.42 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-3611 139380 KELLY SERVICES $118.80 TEMPORARY SERVICES 139381 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $893.07 MACHINE REPAIRS 139382 KING BEARING,INC. $1.057.37 MACHINE SUPPLIES 139383 KIRST PUMP&MACHINE WORKS $85.84 PUMP PARTS 139384 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $5.604.90 HARDWARE 439385 KROHNE AMERICA,INC. $230.09 METER 139386 L.A.S.INCORPORATED $7,878.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139387 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $053.69 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139388 ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION $198.00 PUBLICATION 139389 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGR. $66,583.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1.40-182 139390 CHARLES P.CROWLEY CO. $590.62 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139391 LIEBERT CORPORATION $24,555.06 ELECTRIC PARTS 139392 LIMNOROUE CORP. $802.45 VALVE PARTS 139393 SOHO-LYNCH CORP. $418.73 JANITORIAL SERVICES 139394 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $970.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.640-92 139395 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $477.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT m 139396 MPS $134.63 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES X 139397 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION.INC. $302.787.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 139395 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $303.73 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES to 139399 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $452.12 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 139400 MC13AIN INSTRUMENTS $525.00 LAB MAINTENANCE 139401 MCGARRY CENTRAL TYPEWRITER,INC. $1.686.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT t"1 139402 BEN MEADOWS ENVIRONMENTAL $181.44 LAB SUPPLIES 13NO MEASUREMENT VARIABLES $388.66 ELECTRIC PARTS t 139404 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $317.80 GAUGE 139405 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS $74.514.05 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT 139406 MES COMPANY $14.156.49 REPAIR PARTS 139407 METRA INSTRUMENTS,INC. $2.360.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139408 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $9,606.55 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 139409 MISSION INDUSTRIES $6,421.77 UNIFORM RENTALS 139410 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO. $161.50 SUBSCRIPTION 139411 PAUL MONROE $216.96 ENGINE PARTS 139412 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $1.700.00 LAB SERVICES 139413 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $37.45 HARDWARE 139414 NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S $345.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 139415 NATIONAL FILTER MEDIA CORP. $4.388.16 FILTER BELTS 139416 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $70.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 139417 NATIONWIDE PAPERS $4,253.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139418 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $2,634,66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139419 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $4.79 WATER USE 139420 NORTHWESTERN CARBON $2,353.26 CHEMICALS 139421 OI CORPORATION $1,121.22 PUMP PARTS 139422 OPERATION TECHNOLOGY,INC. $2,078.54 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139423 ORACLE EDUCATION CENTER $1.750.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8103194 PAGEOS REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/10/94 POSTING DATE OBH08M WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 139424 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY $714.96 CHEMICALS 139425 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $5.046.48 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139426 ORANGE COURIER $89.10 COURIER SERVICES 139427 ORANGE VALVE B FITTING CO. $I.NB.65 FITTINGS 139428 PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH LABS $585.00 LAB SUPPLIES 139429 PSSI $508.25 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 139430 PACIFIC PARTS $2,350.17 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139431 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. $1.832.83 PUMP PARTS 139432 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $277.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139433 PACIFIC CLAY PRODUCTS $228.69 PLUMBING PARTS 139434 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $188.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 139435 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $37.29 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 139436 PAK WEST $144.53 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139437 THE PARADIGM GROUP $14,662.20 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 139438 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 139439 PARTS UNLIMITED $521.57 TRUCK PARTS 139440 PASCAL B LUDWIG $l17.668.50 CONSTRUCTION P243.1 139441 KPMG PEAT MARWICK CPA $2,902.00 AUDIT SERVICES M.O.5-11-94 fn 139442 PEDERSON COMMUNICATIONS $3.841.00 CABLE X 139443 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $520.90 LAB SUPPLIES 2 13944/ PERMA SEAL $178.28 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139445 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $154.898.56 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 -{ 139446 PITNEY BOWES $282.14 POSTAGE MACHINE SERVICE AGREEMENT t-t 139447 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1.262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 13944E POLYPURE,INC. $17.948.71 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 Vl 139449 PROFESSIONAL FIRE PROTECTION $100.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139450 PROFESSIONAL TREE CARE $8.000.00 LANDSCAPING SERVICES 139451 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $6,215.50 FINANCIAL ADVISOR SERVICES M.0.618M 139452 PROTOTYPE,INC. $269,38 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 139453 CHARLES PUCKETT $1,510,53 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 139454 RMB ENGINEERING/MILLTRONICS $1,966,10 INSTRUMENT 139455 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $51.23 METER 139456 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $48.20 LAB SUPPLIES 139457 REDWINGSHOES $256,02 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 139458 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $641.45 ELECTRIC PARTS 139459 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1.31989 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139460 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO. $1.38276 CHEMICALS 139461 ROAN ENGINEERING CO. $77.78 ENGRAVING 139462 ROYOES43REAUX PROPERTY $821 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 139463 RYAN-HERCO $433.28 METAL 139464 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $1.670.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 139465 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $807.14 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139466 SAVANT INSTRUMENTS,INC. $7,219,91 LAB SUPPLIES 139467 SCHERING-PLOUGH $128.64 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139468 SCHWING AMERICA $187.84 PUMP PARTS 139469 R.CRAIG SCOTT B ASSOC. $21.028.75 LEGAL SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/03M PAGE 06 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/10/94 POSTING DATE 08/10/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 139470 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $1,5WAS SPECIALTY GASES 139471 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1,331.79 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139472 SEALSLACK $53.86 ASPHALT 139473 SETCOM CORP. $8,384.05 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 139474 SHAMROCKSUPPLY $247.61 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139475 SHURELUCK SALES $1.899.80 TOOLSBIARDWARE 139476 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $325.04 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 139477 SMITH-EMERY CO. $324.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 139478 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY,INC. $210.34 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139479 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $9.501.67 PERMIT FEES 139480 SO.CALIF COASTAL WATER $299.740.00 DIST SHARE OF SCCWRP M.0.2-9.94 139481 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $11.801.55 NATURAL GAS 139492 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $7,939.07 DIESEWNLEADED FUEL 139483 SOUVENIR PHOTO $102.14 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 139484 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $13.50 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 139485 WESTALLOY,INC. $2,11?.05 WELDING SUPPLIES 139486 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $687.82 LAB SUPPLIES m 139487 SPIRE TECHNOLOGIES SYS DIV. $8.941.41 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139488 STRATAGENE $155.00 LAB SUPPLIES = 139489 GARY G.STREED $5.055.12 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL 139490 STROMBERG PRODUCTS $921.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139491 SUNSETFORD $187.39 TRUCK PARTS -I 139492 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $155.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES n 139493 TIF INSTRUMENTS,INC. $83.70 ELECTRIC PARTS I 139494 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $795.19 ELECTRIC CART PARTS m 139495 TAYLOR INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE $3,901.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139496 TEKMAR COMPANY $105.07 LAB SUPPLIES 139497 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $239.51 MECHANICAL PARTS 139498 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $836,00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6094 139499 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $247.35 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139500 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $1,727.92 LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE M.0.5-11-94 139501 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $605.16 TRUCK PARTS 139502 TRUESOAIL LABS $506.52 LAB SERVICES 139503 JG TUCKER 8 SON,INC. $10,042.67 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139504 TWINING LABORATORIES $3,923.94 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 139505 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $232.02 TRUCK PARTS 139506 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $315.00 LAB SUPPLIES 139507 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $255.41 PARCEL SERVICES 139508 VWR SCIENTIFIC $3.953.72 LAB SUPPLIES 139509 VALIN CORPORATION $1,070.75 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 139510 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $1,160.37 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139511 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $72.77 LAB SUPPLIES 139512 VERTEX SYSTEMS $2.045.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 139513 VILLAGE NURSERIES $42.67 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 139514 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $55.302.15 CHEMICALS M.0.3.9-94 139515 CARL WARREN&CO. $582.46 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE SM3/94 PAGE-07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08/10094 POSTING DATE 08110I94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 139516 WECO INDUSTRIES,INC. $1,276.06 TOOLS 139517 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $526.89 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139518 WTIEG $113.14 LAB SERVICES 139519 ROURKE,WOODRUFF B SPRADLIN $49,164.40 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 139520 XEROX CORP. $16,626.39 COPIER LEASES 139521 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $10.159.60 ENGINE PARTS 139522 RAYYOUNG $35,501.05 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 139523 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $169.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139524 ZIFF COMMUNICATIONS $2.592.59 SUBSCRIPTION 139525 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 06/01/94 $2,652,528.62 SUMMARY AMOUNT m 01 OPER FUND $7,381.32 X 02 OPER FUND 21,987.94 .�. 02 CAP FAC FUND 2,180.00 Cd 03 OPER FUND 24.036.70 03 CAP FAC FUND 17,054.47 05 OPER FUND 4,553.20 n 05 CAP PAC FUND 316.00 O6 OPER FUND 4.745.61 v 06 CAP FAC FUND 2.587.63 07 OPER FUND 7,262.76 07 CAP FAC FUND 12.499.57 011 OPER FUND 9.701.70 011 CAP FAG FUND 6,058.11 013 OPER FUND 101.72 914 OPER FUND 2.395.60 014 CAP FAC FUND 9.005.88 07814 OPER FUND 345.58 JT OPER FUND 609.456.07 CORF 1,347,279.01 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 10,639.29 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 552.949.87 $2. 552,528.62 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE BHM94 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0824I94 POSTING DATE 0I 24194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139561 A&G INDUSTRIES $1,925.81 SAMPLER PART 139562 AG TECH COMPANY 955.281.12 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 139563 ATM AA,INC. $25.601.95 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING M.0.11-18-92 139564 AT&T $3.018.10 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 139555 AT&T $1,120.18 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 139566 AT&T $1.32 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 139567 AIR LIOUIDE AMERICA CORP. $924.49 SPECIALTY GASES 139568 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $35,576.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9.89 139569 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO,LTD. SM.845.60 MANHOLE COVERS 139570 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $27.03 ASPHALT 139571 AMERICAN COMPUTER&COMM, $787.07 PRINTER 139572 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1.022.47 PAINT SUPPLIES 139573 AMER.SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY $617.00 PUBLICATION 139574 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $270.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139575 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $3,094.36 NOTICES&ADS 139576 ABC LABORATORIES $6,746.00 LAB SERVICES 139577 ARMOR-VAC $450.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 139578 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $282.20 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL Rl 139579 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $35.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL X 139580 ASSOC.ADMINIS.&CONSULTANTS 5255.00 INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS 2 w 139582 AUTOMATIC COMPUTAPROCESSING $3.629.32 PAYROLL SERVICES � 139582 AVNET COMPUTER $3,629.32 COMPUTER WORKSTATION --1 139583 AWARDS&TROPHIES $483.48 PLAQUES 139594 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $457.94 WIRE 139585 BKK LANDFILL $2.365.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-&91 F+ 139586 BANANA BLUEPRINT $1.182.62 PRINTING M.O.10-IM0 139587 BASLER ELECTRIC $150.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 139588 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3,9W.66 LAB SUPPLIES 139589 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $578.10 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 139590 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $247.50 LAB SUPPLIES 139691 BELL SECURITY $2,133.80 SECURITY SERVICES 139592 BENZ ENGINEERING,INC. $2,233.91 COMPRESSOR PARTS 139593 BERG POWER ENGINEERS,INC. $5,500.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 139594 BISHOPCOMPANY $1.222.88 TOOLS 139595 BLACK&VEATCH $10.930.18 EMISSIONS TESTING M.O.7-14-93 139596 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $54.46 TRUCK REPAIRS 139597 BONA-RUES $166.10 TRUCK PARTS 139598 BOOT BARN $56.09 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 139599 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $38.215.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES P141 139600 BROWN&CALDWELL CONSULTANTS $147.118.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 93-117 139601 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY $204.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139602 C.L.TECHNOLOGY 5720.00 LAB SERVICES 139603 CS COMPANY $13,516.50 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139604 CALTROL,INC. $956.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139605 CALIFORNIA AIR TOXICS $9,740.00 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 139606 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $576.94 SERVICE AGREEMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/18/94 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 08124/94 POSTING DATE 08/24I91 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139607 CAPITAL WESTWARD $593.29 REGULATOR PART 139608 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $524.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33 139609 CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO. $2,390.37 TRUCK PARTS 13961D CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $8,016.37 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139611 HELEN CHEONLEEN $7,130.39 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 139612 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT S4,858.73 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139613 COLE SCIENTIFIC,INC. $2,246.74 LAB SERVICES 139614 COUCH AND SONS $122,332.25 CONSTRUCTION 6-37A 139615 COUCH&SONS $225,379.53 CONSTRUCTION 11-17-1 139616 COMPUSA,INC. $444.45 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 139617 COMPUSERVE $27.86 COMPUTER SERVICES 139518 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $474.32 TRUCK PARTS 139619 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $2.230.43 CHLORINE M.O.10.11.93 139520 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $5211.03 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.8-11.93 139621 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $315.73 ENGINE PARTS 139622 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $780.71 TRUCK PARTS 139623 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $485.77 ELECTRIC PARTS 139624 DAPPER TIRE $232.31 TIRES X 139625 PETER C.DAVID CO. $52,265.82 CONSTRUCTION 7.20 = 139626 HSWDECKER $164.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139627 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $0.290.12 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.B-11.93 139628 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $2,690.81 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139629 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $398,996.05 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT M.O.64.94 139530 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $940.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE C 139631 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. 5972.66 PAINT SUPPLIES N 139632 EJL&ASSOC, $2,332.54 CONSULTING SERVICES 139634 ERI SP NORTH O E$502.91 LAS SUPPLIES MECHANICAL 139634 ESP NORTH E512.91 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 139635 EASTMAN,INC. $3.654.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139636 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $60.17 TRUCK PARTS 139637 JAMES M.ELO $15OAO REIMBURSE JUDGMENT 139838 ENCHANTER,INC. $5.600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 139639 ERNST&YOUNG $85.000.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.64.94 139540 FMC CORP. $509.00 LAB SUPPLIES 139MI FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5.685.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.104.91 139642 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $840.20 AIR FREIGHT 139643 FIRST CHOICE $1,027.00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM PARTS 139644 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $329.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139645 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. 52,666.45 LAB SUPPLIES 139646 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $236.78 PHOTO SUPPLIES 139647 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $194.64 PAINT SUPPLIES 139648 GST,INC. $1,073.12 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139649 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $526.77 LUMBERMARDWARE 139650 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2.484.10 CHEMICALS 139651 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $217.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139652 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4,189.07 TELEPHONE SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE BlIaM4 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O8rMW POSTING DATE O8/24104 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139653 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $8,615.78 MECHANICAL PARTS 139654 GRASSY S.T.I. $7.261.68 ENGINE PARTS 139655 THOMAS GRAY 8 ASSOC..INC. 5848.00 LAB SERVICES 139658 DGA CONSULTANTS $15.448.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.".94 139657 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $4,365.00 PUMP PARTS 139658 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $1,551.80 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139659 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $9,220.00 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 139660 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES $779.22 TEMPORARY SERVICES 139661 HOLMES 8 NARVER,INC. $55.520.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1.44 139662 HOME DEPOT $312.22 HARDWARE 139553 RS HUGHES CO,INC. 5236.31 PAINT SUPPLIES 139664 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $21.75 WATER USE 139665 HUNTINGTON ENG B EVIRON. $700.OD CONSULTING SERVICES-VOC VAPOR 139666 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN $343.55 BICYCLE PARTS 139667 IMAGING PLUS $1.392.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139668 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $100,853.68 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.1 IAA-92 139669 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $2,308.01 CONNECTORS rn 139670 INSTRUMENTS FOR RESEARCH 5505.90 LAB SUPPLIES x 139671 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $150.00 PAYROLL DEDUCTION 2 139672 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $857.81 BATTERIES �--' 139873 IRVINE PHOTO GRAPHICS $5.58 PHOTO SERVICES tv 139674 J.C.R.METAL STAMPING $1 163.70 LAB SUPPLIES 1 139675 JH RECOGNITION CO. $104.37 SERVICE AWARDS L7 139676 JAMISON ENGINEERING $10.735.65 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1 139677 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $215.24 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES W 139678 JAYS CATERING $187.49 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 139679 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $588.38 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139680 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $520.49 ELECTRIC PARTS 139681 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $267.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139682 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $139.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 139683 KING BEARING,INC. $2.599.53 MACHINE SUPPLIES 139684 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,199.52 TOOLS 139685 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $283.17 PUMP PARTS 139686 LEHMAN BROTHERS,INC. $6,232.88 REMARKETING FEE RES 94-6 139687 LIEBERT CORPORATION $450.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 139688 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $1.236.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIRONMENTAL 139689 LOCALAGENCY $500.00 ANNEXATION FEE 139690 LOCALAGENCY WWI ANNEXATION FEE 139691 LORAIN PRODUCTS $1,317.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139692 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $970.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 139693 MPS $61.76 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 139694 MACOMCO $633.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139695 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $7,758.00 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 139696 MANDIC MOTORS $35.00 TOWING SERVICES 139697 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $01.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139698 MAVERICK,INC. $19,442.25 CRANE REPAIRS FUND NO 9190 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8I18/94 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID OW4194 POSTING DATE 08124/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139599 MC APES ASSOCIATES $7,716.64 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139700 MCKENNA ENGR&EQUIP $403.09 PUMP PARTS 139701 BEN MEADOWS ENVIRONMENTAL $126.95 LAB SUPPLIES 139702 MEDLIN CONTROLS CO. $553.12 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139703 METALUBE CORP. $344.43 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 139704 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $26261.45 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 139705 MILLER CONSTRUCTION CO. $3,39B.60 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 139706 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4,242.74 UNIFORM RENTALS 139707 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL $58.00 PUBLICATION 139708 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $973.352.29 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A 139709 MONITOR LABS $271.43 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139710 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES 5340.00 LAB SERVICES 139711 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $503.95 PUMP PARTS 139712 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $3.900.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE 139713 NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH $W,D00.00 HARI ANNUAL CONTRIB, 139714 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $617.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139715 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $501.88 SAFETY GLASSES fTl 139716 OFFICE PAVILIONS/INTERIOR RESOURCES $1.405.39 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS 139717 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $149.13 TRUCK PARTS = 139710 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $2,002.35 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES "-� 139719 ORANGE COURIER $133.65 COURIER SERVICES 139720 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $558.20 FITTINGS -� 139721 OXYGEN SERVICE $5.573.73 SPECIALTY GASES 139722 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $4,766.55 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 139723 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $4.230.83 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP t 139724 COUNTY OF ORANGE $1.228.00 PERMIT FEES 139725 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $55.395.00 GAP WATER USE M.O.6.9-93 139726 PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH LABS $395.00 LAB SUPPLIES 139727 PSI 9263.60 HARDWARE 139728 PACIFIC PARTS $2,944.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139729 PACIFIC PNEUMATICS,INC. $111.09 FILTER 139730 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT,INC. $1.937.01 PUMP PARTS 139731 PACO PUMPS $253.13 PUMP PARTS 139732 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 5705.71 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139733 PACIFIC BELL $211.72 TELEPHONE SERVICES 139734 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $18&40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 139735 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $881.13 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 139736 PAGENET $1.193.45 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 139737 PASCAL&LUDWIG,INC. $118.49420 CONSTRUCTION PI-38-2 139738 KPMG PEAT MARWICK CPA $3,620.W AUDITING SERVICES M.0.5-11-94 139739 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $1,308.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 139740 PERMA SEAL $350AI INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139741 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $1551820.98 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.541.91 139742 POLY ENTERPRISES.INC. $642.57 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139743 POLYMETRICS.INC. $1,262.75 LAB SUPPLIES 139744 POLYPURE,INC. $17,351.67 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11.92 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE N15/94 PAGE 05 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0824/94 POSTING DATE 0824/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139745 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5,000.00 POSTAGE 139746 DANNY POWELL $4.000.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 139747 PREMIER STEEL $1,644.12 METAL 139748 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $390.D0 ICE 139740 PULSAFEEDER $110.14 PUMP PARTS 139750 DUESTRON CORP. $303.00 LAB SUPPLIES 139751 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. $6.913.52 COMPUTER SERVICES 139752 RMB ENGINEERINGIMILLTRONICS $65.54 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 139753 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $303.91 ENGINE PARTS 139754 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1.715.43 TRASH REMOVAL 139755 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $457.44 LAB SUPPLIES 139756 RATTRAY AND ASSOCIATES,INC. $14.480.00 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY 338 139757 BOLT DELIVERY $58.00 FREIGHT 139758 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $940.00 OCEAN MONITORING 139759 RELIANCE ELECTRIC $645.32 ELECTRIC PARTS 139760 REPUBLIC ENGINES $441.51 TRUCK PARTS 139761 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $5,014.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES R1 139762 ROYCE PRODUCTIONS $6.300.00 PUBLIC INFORMATION VIDEO 139763 RYAN-HERCO $79.63 METAL Z 139764 SAFT/NIFE,INC. $120.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 139765 SAND DOLLAR BUSINESS FORMS $627.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139766 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $572.87 PLUMBING SUPPLIES —1 139767 SANWA BANK $108,150.25 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 14-1-1A G 139768 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $40.895.37 CONSTRUCTION 5-36 I 139769 CHARLES SCWAB 8 CO.,INC. $38,524.82 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF to 139770 R.CRAIG SCOTT&ASSOC. $31,940.61 LEGAL SERVICES 139771 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $87.62 SPECIALTY GASES 139772 UC REGENTS $187.00 LAB EQUIPMENT RENTAL 139773 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $1,618.00 LAB SUPPLIES 139774 SEA COAST DESIGNS 5467.64 OFFICE FURNITURE 139775 SENSUS TECHNOLOGIES $698.65 METER 139776 SF SERRANTINO $31.357.86 DEFERRED COMP PAY-OFF 139777 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.542.84 TOOLS 139778 SHURELUCK SALES $8.841.66 TOOLSIHARDWARE 139779 SIMS WELDING SUPPLY $7.75 WELDING SUPPLIES 139780 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $105.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 139781 SMITH PIPE$SUPPLY $328.13 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139782 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $136.26 TOOLS 139783 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $29.140.95 PERMIT FEES 139794 SOUTH COAST WATER $35.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 139785 WILLIAM P.BECKER,TREASURER $24,OU0.00 SOAP MEMBERSHIP DUES M.O.7-13-94 139706 SOUTHERN CALIF.EDISON CO. $84,MI.22 POWER 139787 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $33.622.12 POWER 139788 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $180.539.96 NATURAL GAS 139789 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $6.669.93 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 139790 SOUTH SHORE WINDOW MAINT. $2.083.33 BUILDING MAINTENANCE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8/1B/94 PAQE OB REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 0824/94 POSTING DATE 0824/94 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 139791 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2.579.20 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 139792 WESTALLOY,INC. $476.25 WELDING SUPPLIES 139793 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCE SYST. $10.817.72 COMPUTER SOFTWARE LICENSE 139794 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $284.20 LAB SUPPLIES 139795 STERLINGART $7.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 139795 GARY G.STREED $1,091.49 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 139797 SUMMIT STEEL $1,093.23 METAL 139798 SUNSET FORD $38.52 TRUCK PARTS 139799 SUPELCO,INC. $365.08 LAB SUPPLIES 139800 TARBY ENGINEERING 5456.00 PUMP PARTS 139801 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $798.07 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 139802 TEKDRAULICS $2.889.55 PUMP PARTS 139803 TEXMATE,INC. $346.37 INSTRUMENT PARTS 139804 THOMAS FISH COMPANY $1D7.25 LAB SUPPLIES 139805 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1.151.52 MECHANICAL PARTS 139806 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $262.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6/8/94 139807 TROPICAL PLAZA NURSERY,INC. $3.465.84 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.5-11-94 m 139800 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $514.42 TRUCK PARTS 139809 TRUESDAIL LABS $2.880.61) LAB SERVICES = 139810 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $10.408.65 RENTAL EQUIPMENT It 139611 TUSTIN DODGE $38.19 TRUCK PARTS 139812 TWINING LABORATORIES $6.957.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-13-94 -1 139813 USA SCIENTIFIC PLASTICS $111.92 LAB SUPPLIES C 139814 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $380.60 LAB SUPPLIES 1 139815 UNIVERSAL MARINE INDUSTRIES $1.898.39 MECHANICAL PARTS Ol 139816 VWR SCIENTIFIC $1,406.89 LAB SUPPLIES 139817 VAUN CORPORATION $358.52 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 139818 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $2,470.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139819 VORTEX INDUSTRIES $208.93 BUILDING REPAIRS 139820 GUY L.WARDEN&SONS $1.144.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 139821 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT $1.562.76 SAFETY SUPPLIES 139822 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $74,937.71 CAUSTIC SODA&14YPOCHLORITE M.0.8-12-92&4113194 139823 WEST-CITE SUPPLY CO. $107.67 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 139824 WESCO $130.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 139625 WHESSOE VAREC $121.56 VALVES 139826 WITEG $624.90 LAB SUPPLIES 139827 XEROX CORP. $365.28 COPIER LEASES 139828 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $1,989.94 ENGINE PARTS 139829 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS $150.17 OPERATING SUPPLIES 139830 YORK INTERNATIONAL $1.518.53 ELECTRIC PARTS 139531 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $174.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0811504 $3.927.302.92 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 8I18N14 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL SUMMARY AMOUNT #2 OPER FUND 3,739.68 #2 CAP FAG FUND 147.64 #3 OPER FUND 87.848.05 93 CAP FAC FUND 20,839.27 #5 OPER FUND 2.241.58 #5 CAP FAC FUND 41,339.30 07 OPER FUND 7.121.61 07 CAP FAG FUND 53,493.82 911 OPER FUND 7.974.78 011 CAP FAC FUND 225.417.92 014 OPER FUND 17.64 014 CAP FAC FUND 1,101,561.78 #3&11 OPER FUND 3.900.00 #5&6OPER FUND 2,559.93 m #5&6 CAP FAC FUND 122,332.25 X #6&7OPER FUND 2,425.99 2 #7&14 FUND 7,051.96 JT OPER RFU FUND 962,778.97 -I CORF 844.812.31 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 4,535.83 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 425,160.71 v E3,927,302.92 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 .2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on , �y 19fy was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts, offices on IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 19 . A� Penny Kyl , A ant Secretary of each of t Bo of Directors of County Sanitati Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 , 11, 13 6 14 of Orange County, California F27A.1