Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-04-13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ^3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714) 962-2411 April 7, 1994 NOTICE OF MEETING JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA WEDNESDAY, APRIL 13. 1994 - 7:30 P.M. DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 The Regular Meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above location, time and date. & 14 Assistant ffaldt7cretary Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: EXECUTIVE SUBCOMMITTEE - Monday, April llth, at 12:00 noon FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 20th, at 5:30 p.m. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE - Thursday, April 21st, at 5:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 27th, at 5:30 p.m. SPECIAL JOINT WORKS - Thursday, April 28th, at 5:30 p.m. SELECTION COMMITTEE RE COMPUTERS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10244 ELLIE AVENUE PO 90N 8121 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 82728A127 111.1962.2411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings April Apr 13, 1994 Apr 27, 1994 May May 11, 1994 May 25, 1994 June Jun 08, 1994 Jun 22, 1994 July Jul 13, 1994 Jul 27, 1994 August Aug 10, 1994 None Scheduled September Sep 14, 1994 Sep 28, 1994 October Oct 12, 1994 Oct 26, 1994 November Nov 09, 1994 None Scheduled December Dec 14, 1994 None Scheduled January Jan 11, 1995 Jan 25, 1995 February Feb 08, 1995 Feb 22, 1995 March Mar 08, 1995 Mar 22, 1995 April Apr 12, 1995 Apr 26, 1995 ^ r 4 AGENDA JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 - OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CA 92708 REGULAR MEETING APRIL 13, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2, THIS AGENDA HAS BEEN POSTED IN THE MAIN LOBBY OF THE DISTRICTS' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES NOT LESS THAN 72 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING DATE AND TIME ABOVE. ALL WRITTEN MATERIALS RELATING TO EACH AGENDA ITEM ARE AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE OFFICE OF THE BOARD SECRETARY. IN THE EVENT ANY MATTER NOT LISTED ON THIS AGENDA IS PROPOSED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE BOARDS FOR DISCUSSION AND/OR ACTION, IT WILL BE DONE IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 54954.2(b) AS AN EMERGENCY ITEM OR THAT THERE IS A NEED TO TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION WHICH NEED CAME TO THE ATTENTION OF THE DISTRICTS SUBSEQUENT TO THE POSTING OF THE AGENDA, OR AS SET FORTH ON A SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA POSTED NOT LESS THAN 72 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING DATE. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. Matters of interest addressed by a member of the public and not listed on this agenda cannot have action taken by the Boards of Directors except as authorized by Section 54954.2(b). (6) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman; consideration of Resolutions or commendations, presentations and awards (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel P 04/13/94 (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - March 9, 1994 regular District 2 - March 9, 1994 regular District 3 - March 9, 1994 regular District 5 - March 9, 1994 regular District 6 - March 9, 1994 regular District 7 - March 9, 1994 regular District 11 - March 9, 1994 regular District 13 - March 9, 1994 regular District 14 - March 9, 1994 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See pages "A" and "B" 03/09/94 03 2 94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $1,004,169.51 $647,458.36 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 204,626.28 2,019,293.41 Joint Working Capital Fund - 181,959.29 275,201 .39 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 38,567.97 28,095.51 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 0.00 5,194.41 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 2,520.00 11,351 .67 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 6,206.61 46,818.15 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 91,831.96 167,892.99 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 316.41 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 22,348.57 22,306.27 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 43,376.36 10,250.06 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 207.29 876.27 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 178,041 .72 15,321.95 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 2,302.89 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 9,963.00 6,319.69 S1,783.818.56 S3.258.999.43 -2- 04/13/94 (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(al THROUGH 9(k) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these Items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-36, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of 12.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Specification No. C-033, to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation, for the delivered price of $.3742 per gallon, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning May 14, 1994, with option for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms (Estimated annual cost $248,843.00 plus sales tax). See page "C" (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to C.S. Company in the amount of $53,613.00, plus sales tax and freight, for Purchase of Plug Valves (Specification No. E-242). (c) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Purchase of Three 3/4 Ton Standard Size Pickup Trucks, Specification No. V-002, to Fuller Ford, for a total amount not to exceed $40,896.00 plus sales tax. See page "D" -3- J 04/13/94 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of the following actions relative to the plans and specifications for Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28 (Rebid): (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, granting a time extension of 90 calendar days to the contract with Soffa Electric, Inc., for equipment installation delay under Districts' direction. See page "E" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-37, accepting said contract as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. See page "F" (e) Consideration of the following actions relative to the plans and specifications for Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-32: (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net deduction of $4,401 .00 from the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for seven items of added or deleted work, granting a time extension of 75 calendar days for completion of said additional work and assessment of liquidated damages at $500 per day for 20 days for unauthorized delays. See page "G" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-38, accepting said contract as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. See page "H" (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-1; Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-1; Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-4; and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-3, authorizing a deduction of $9,500.00 from the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc., Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for deletion of contractor's "All Risk" insurance requirement to be covered under the Districts' master policy at a savings. See page "I" -4- 04/13/94 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1, authorizing an addition of $33,436.00 to the contract with Amelco Construction, a Division of Amelco Industries, for four items of additional work. See page "J" (h) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate agreements for Surveying Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects (Specification No. P-150) to be constructed over the next three years, for future consideration by the Boards. (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate agreements for Soils, Concrete and Other Materials Testing Services for Various Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects (Specification No. P-151) to be constructed over the next three years, for future consideration by the Boards. DISTRICT 7 (j) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-41-7, approving agreement with County of Orange providing for the adjustment of manholes on District sewers in conjunction with the County's 1993-94 street resurfacing program in unincorporated County areas within District No. 7, and providing for payment of the actual cost of the manhole adjustment plus 10% for inspection and administrative costs for approximately 84 manholes, at a per-manhole unit cost not to exceed $220.00 nor be less than $155.00 per manhole; and authorizing payment of required deposit of $18,480.00 for said work. See page "K" (k) Consideration of motion to receive and file petition from BA Properties, Inc. requesting annexation of 128.734 acres of territory to the District, in the vicinity northeast of the intersection of Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road in the City of Orange; and consideration of Resolution No. 94-42-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 148 - Crawford Hills Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). See pages "L" and "M" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -5- 04/13/94 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees' written reports of their meetings on March 16, 1994 and March 23, 1994, respectively (copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said Committees: (2) DISTRICTS 2.3.5.7 & 11 ONLY The Executive Committee recommends that the individual Districts forego the automatic annexation fee increases for fiscal year 1994-95, subject to a determination by each District relative to its fiscal situation: (a) If a District determines that its annexation fee should increase automatically for fiscal year 1994-95 pursuant to its existing policy resolution, no action is necessary. -or- (b) If a District elects to forego the automatic annexation fee increase for fiscal year 1994-95, and retain the fee schedule currently in effect, then consideration of the fallowing resolutions amending Districts' resolutions confirming fees, procedures and policies concerning annexations of territory to the Districts, and foregoing the automatic annexation fee increases for fiscal year 1994-95, is appropriate: See paged" 1994.1995 Acreaae Fee Confirming Tax w o Tox District Resolution No. Resolution No. Exchanae Exchange 2 94-43-2 91-113-2 $2,922 $3,908 3 94-44-3 91-114-3 $3,154 $4,139 5 94-45-5 91-115-5 $3,054 $4,084 7 94-46-7 91-116-7 $2,902 $3,883 11 94-47.11 93-124-11 $5,190 $6,252 -6- (ITEM 11 CONTINUED ON PAGE 71 04/13/94 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-39, approving amended Deferred Compensation Plan for officers and employees. See page "0" (12) ALL DISTRICTS CLOSED SESSION: DURING THE COURSE OF CONDUCTING THE BUSINESS SET FORTH ON THIS AGENDA AS A REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARDS, THE CHAIRMAN MAY CONVENE THE BOARDS IN CLOSED SESSION TO CONSIDER MATTERS OF PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION, OR PERSONNEL MATTERS, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 54956.9, 54957 OR 54957.6. REPORTS RELATING TO (A) PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY; IBI MATTERS OF PENDING OR POTENTIAL LITIGATION; (CI EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION; OR WHICH ARE EXEMPT FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE UNDER THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT, MAY BE REVIEWED BY THE BOARDS DURING A PERMITTED CLOSED SESSION AND ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION. AT SUCH TIME AS FINAL ACTIONS ARE TAKEN BY THE DIRECTORS ON ANY OF THESE SUBJECTS, THE MINUTES WILL REFLECT ALL REQUIRED DISCLOSURES OF INFORMATION. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) (1) Confer with Districts' representatives concerning status of negotiations with employee group representatives on salaries, benefits and terms of employment. (a) Districts' Representatives; General Manager, General Counsel, Director of Personnel and Director of Finance (b) Employee Organizations; (1) International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 501; (2) Orange County Employees Association -7- [ITEM (12) CONTINUED ON PAGE 81 04/13/94 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from Page 7) (2) Confer with General Counsel re existing litigation: County Sanitation Districts v. Brinderson Corporation and Cooper Industries - arbitration re breach of contract. (3) Confer with General Counsel re anticipated litigation: County Sanitation Districts v. Advanco Constructors and Temcor. Inc. - re odor control, dome covers re breach of contract. (c) Reconvene in regular session (d) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (1 ) Approval of Memoranda of Understanding with employee organizations re salaries, benefits and terms of employment: Emnlovee Unit MOU Date MOU Period Administrative and Clerical 04/06/94 11/26/93 - 11/21/96 Engineering 04/06/94 11/26/93 - 11121/96 Technical Services 04/06/94 11/26/93 - 11/21/96 (13) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (14) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (15) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (16) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (18) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- 04/13/94 (20) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICT 2 Actions relative to Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1 : (a) Verbal report of staff (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-40-2, approving plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1 , and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (Tentative bid date May 10, 1994). See page "P" -9- 04/13/94 (31) DISTRICT 2 CLAIMS OF 245 PROPERTY OWNERS RE ANAHEIM HILLS LANDSLIDE (a) Receive and file report of General Counsel. See page "Q" (b) Receive and file claims of 245 property owners without action to approve or deny (c) Authorize General Counsel to take all measures to defend the interests of the Districts (32) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn -10- AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE APRIL 13, 1994 AT 7:30 P.M. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a): AWARD PURCHASE OF 12.5% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION. SPECIFICATION NO. C-033. Staff has successfully used sodium hypochlorite (bleach) to take the place of chlorine in foul air scrubbers for odor control and for plant water disinfection, and it has proved to be very effective. Based on this success, and because of rising chlorine costs and safety issues related to its use, staff has recommended continuation of using bleach instead of chlorine. The existing contract will expire on May 14, 1994. Sealed bids were received on March 22, 1994, for delivery of 12.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for a one-year period beginning May 14, 1994, with provision for four one-year extensions. Four bids and one no-bid were received. The low bid received was $0.3742 per gallon and the high bid was $0.475 per gallon, plus applicable sales tax. The low bid is approximately 15% less than the Districts' current contract for bleach. Based on an estimated yearly usage of 665,000 gallons, the estimated annual cost is $248,843.00, plus applicable sales tax. Staff recommends award of contract to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation, the lowest responsible bidder, for Purchase of 12.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Solution for the unit price of$0.3742 per gallon delivered, plus applicable sales tax, for a one-year period, with option for four one-year extensions upon mutually agreeable terms. April 13, 1994 9(b): AWARD PURCHASE OF THREE 314-TON STANDARD-SIZE PICKUP TRUCKS. SPECIFICATION NO, V-002. Sealed bids were received on March 15, 1994 for the purchase of the three 3/4-ton pickup trucks. Four bids were received. The low bid was $40,896 and the high bid was $50,715, plus applicable sales tax. The three new vehicles will be designated as follows: Quantity Division Description 2 3350 These trucks will be assigned to the (Motor Pool) motor pool replacing: one 1976 Dodge with 156,023 miles and one 1979 GMC with 90,065 miles, which will be sent to auction. Motor pool vehicles are rotated within the fleet to extend their useful life as much as possible. 1 3340 This truck will replace one 1990 Ford (Collection) with 70,909 miles, which will go to the motor pool to replace a 1988 GMC with 137,127 miles, which will be sent to auction. This vehicle is used for transporting equipment and material weighing less than 1,500 pounds. The State of California Cooperative Procurement Program offers the identical model truck (Ford F250)with the same basic specifications for a total cost of$43,992, plus sales tax. The bid solicited by the Districts is $3,096 lower than the State contract for the three vehicles, plus there would be an additional fee for bed liners and the State processing fee. Staff recommends authorization to issue a purchase order to Fuller Ford, Chula Vista, the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $40,896.00, plus sales tax, for the Purchase of Three 3/4-Ton Standard-Size Pickup Trucks, Specification No. V-002. 2- April 13, 1994 9(c): AWARD PURCHASE OF PLUG VALVES, SPECIFICATION NO, E-242. The Districts currently have over 100 ball valves in service at the primary treatment and sludge handling systems at both Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2. These valves, ranging in size between 2 inches and 8 inches, are over ten years old and we have had poor experience with them. In these particular applications, they become very difficult to operate due to contamination by solids, rags and other coarse matter, which causes them to seize up or bind. Because of this, the Districts' Standard Specifications were revised in 1991 to require the use of plug valves for these types of applications, and limit the use of ball valves for services such as clear water or clean gas. In an effort to identify a reliable valve and minimize operational and maintenance costs, several plug valves were evaluated for this troublesome use. The DeZurik Company manufacturers a nonlubricated, eccentric-type plug valve with resilient internal coating, which meets or exceeds our operating and maintenance criteria. We are currently using similar DeZurik valves successfully in the plants. The Districts also use plug valves manufactured by the Keystone Company and Victaulic Company in our plants and pump stations where they perform well in other applications. However, both our maintenance staff and Keystone representatives have concluded that problems experienced with their valves in our primary treatment and sludge handling systems are unacceptable. Keystone is contemplating a redesign of their plug valve for these wastewater applications, but have advised us that they will not offer their product to us until a redesigned prototype has been successfully tested. The Victaulic plug valve has been tested in the plants, and the internal coating failed in less than one month. Victaulic is not pursuing plug valve wastewater applications at this time. Accordingly, staff has solicited a proposal (and/or negotiated a procurement) from C S Company of Torrance, the local factory-authorized representative of the DeZurik Company, for purchase of 119 plug valves, ranging in size from 2 inches to 8 inches. These valves are placed in inventory and withdrawn by maintenance staff as needed for replacement; or, in some instances, a construction contractor is authorized by the plans and specifications to draw the valves for replacement as part of a miscellaneous projects contract. Staff recommends authorization to issue a purchase order to C S Company in the amount of$53,613.00, plus sales tax (and freight) for Purchase of Plug Valves (Specification No. E-242). -3- April 13, 1994 I 9(d): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO PUMP STATION TELEMETRY AND MONITORING SYSTEM JOB NO. J-28 (REBID) AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE. This $312,000.00 project, designed by staff, provides an upgraded telemetry and monitoring system connecting 26 outlying pump stations located throughout the Districts' service area to the new Control Center at Plant No. 1. The monitoring system design is based on dual operator work stations communicating over telephone lease lines to remote terminal units (RTU) at each pump station. Each RTU provides around- the-clock status conditions of the pump station to a central location. The contract with Soffa Electric, Inc. is now complete. (1) Change Order No. 2 This change order is for a time extension to the contract for delays associated with the installation of equipment in the new Control Center. The contractor was directed to delay the installation of contract-specified computer equipment in the new Control Center for 90 calendar days to avoid conflicts with the work of two separate construction projects in the same location. The delay was also necessary for the systematic transfer of both personnel and equipment from the old to new Control Center. There are no additional costs to the contract because of this delay. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for a 90-calendar-day time extension to the contract with Soffa Electric, Inc. (2) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Soffa Electric, Inc. has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached with the agenda material, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement, and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $311,395.00. 9(e): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO FINAL EFFLUENT SAMPLER AND BIOASSAY RESEARCH FACILITY AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO, J-32. AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE. Job No. J-32, Final Effluent Sampler and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2, was designed by Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers and constructed by Pascal and Ludwig Engineers. This project modified and relocated two existing trailers for use as the Districts' new Sampling and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2. This change order consists of six items of additional work, one item of deleted work, and an assessment of$10,000.00 for liquidated damages for a net 20-day delay in completing the work. -4- April 13, 1994 (1) Change Order No. 1 Item 1, a credit for $2,906.00, deletes a 3-inch thick surface layer of aggregate base material from the area around the perimeter of the Final Effluent Sampler and Bioassay Research Trailers. It was determined that the aggregate would be disturbed by another construction project adjacent to this contract, so this item of work was deleted. Item 2 is an addition of 61 calendar days to the contract for additional staff time to review the component and equipment submittals. Item 3, in the amount of$2,228.00 and 4 calendar days, is for removal and replacement of a portion of the existing Sampler Building roof, as required, for the installation of the specified air compressor. The existing door openings in the building were too small to allow passage of the air compressor. Item 4, in the amount of$1,932.00 and 6 calendar days, is for providing alternative fasteners to the trailer tie-down system. The specified fasteners required modification for proper seismic connections. Item 5, in the amount of$3,684.00 and 4 calendar days, is for modifications to the conduit, conductors, circuit breakers and panels. These modifications were required to provide electrical power for the new water heaters in the Final Effluent Sampler Trailer and in the Bioassay Research Trailer. The electrical power requirements for the water heaters needed to be modified for proper operation and to conform with the National Electric Code (NEC). Item 6, in the amount of$427.00, is for the relocation of the control panel for the air compressor in the Sampler building. NEC requirements require a clear work space in front of the control panel. The existing sample pump and piping are located within this zone and cannot be moved without prior permission from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). It was decided to expedite this needed project by relocating the panel in lieu of waiting for other lengthy governmental agency approvals for pump and piping relocation. Item 7, in the amount of$234.00, is to provide a new sink faucet and associated piping for the Bioassay Research Trailer. The existing water system leaked and required replacement. Item 8, a credit for$10,000.00, is an assessment of liquidated damages, figured at $500.00 per day for 20 days, for late completion of the project. -5- April 13, 1994 Except for Items 3, 4 and 5, the changes described above would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. Item 3 involves modifications to existing equipment; Item 4 is a District-requested change to the original design; and Item 5 was a contract omission. If the Districts approve this change order, the total cost to date of the change orders on this contract will be a credit of$4,401.00 with 75 calendar days time extension. This represents an decrease of 2.2% under the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for a net deduction of $4,401.00 and 75 calendar days time extension to the contract with Pascal and Ludwig Engineers. (2) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Pascal and Ludwig Engineers has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached with the agenda material, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement, and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $198,178.00. 9(f): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO, 1 FOR ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO, 1. JOB NO, P1-36-1: SECURITY AND LANDSCAPING ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO, P1-38-1: MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO, 1. JOB NO, P1-38-4 AND J-17-2: AND MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. Job No. P2-43-3. This $6.1 million project combines several jobs designed by both John Carollo Engineers and Districts' staff. Job No. P1-36-1, Electrification of Pump Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 1, provides for the removal of existing digester-gas-driven engines, and their replacement with electric motors to drive the pumps that transfer the primary effluent into the aeration basins for secondary treatment; Job No. P1-38-1, Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, includes a new satellite security shack on the North Perimeter Road, new fencing along the East and West Perimeter Roads, and new landscaping, lighting and security improvements for plant protection; Job No. P1-3B-4 and J-17-2, Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, provides for elimination of painting on buildings to minimize maintenance costs, installation of a high pressure instrument air system, replacement of the paging systems at both plants, construction of an Emulsion Polymer Facility, electrical system extensions in the laboratory and other miscellaneous -6- April 13, 1994 improvements to Plant No 1. Job No. P2413-3, Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, also includes removing exterior paint on several buildings, removing an existing digester-gas fueled engine, replacing existing boilers, and making other miscellaneous improvements at Plant No. 2. The construction contract was awarded in December 1993 to Advanco Constructors. Item 1, a credit of$9,500.00, deletes the Contractor's Builder's "All Risk" Insurance requirement. The Districts have determined that All Risk insurance for this project is automatically provided under the Districts' current master policy insurance program at a savings. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for a deduction of $9,500.00 from the contract with Advanco Constructors, 9(g): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO, 2. JOB NO, P2-53-1. Job No. P2-53-1, Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, provides structural modifications and additions to Headworks B and C at Treatment Plant No. 2 to minimize damage that would occur to these facilities from a major earthquake. Plant No. 2 is located on the Newport-Inglewood fault. This $1.4 million project was designed by Dames and Moore, and the construction contract was awarded in October 1993 to Amelco Construction. This change order adds $33,436.00 for four items of added work. Item 1, in the amount of$27,123.00, is for removing existing roofing and equipment-support pitch pans, located at both Headworks B and C, which contain asbestos. The asbestos must be removed in accordance with strict state and federal requirements. The existence of asbestos was not previously known. Credit for removal of the existing roofing, as shown in the contract, is included in this item. Item 2, in the amount of$1,551.00, is for removing and reinstalling two existing air supply fans in Headworks C to allow construction of new retrofitted columns which conflict with the fan locations. Costs for temporary fans needed during construction of the columns are included in this item. The existing fans were recently installed by the Maintenance Department and were not shown in the contract documents. Item 3, in the amount of$2,064.00, is for the demolition of an existing air receiver located in Headworks B. The contract documents called for relocation of the receiver within the building, however, the receiver is no longer in service so it was removed. Credit for the receiver relocation shown in the drawings is included in this -7- April 13, 1994 item. Item 4, in the amount of$2,698.00, is for removing existing stairs located on the east side of the Headworks C grit chambers, and modifying and reinstalling the stairs. The building walls were thickened at this location. The stairs, installed under a separate project, were not in place when this project was designed. The changes described above would have been included in the original design if discovered in the design phase. The original contract amount for this project was $1,377,000.00. The net amount of change orders to date is $3,346.00, representing a net increase of 0.25% over the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for the addition of $33,436.00 to the contract with Amelco Construction. There is no time extension associated with this Change Order. 9(h): AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND NEGOTIATE AGREEMENTS FOR SURVEYING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS (SPECIFICATION NO. P-150). Design and construction surveying services for Districts' projects have traditionally been provided by private firms. Preliminary surveys are normally included as part of the design phase of the scope of work, and provided by the project designers. Currently, we have three surveying services contracts which were approved by the Boards in June 1991 and are due to expire July 1, 1994. A one-year contract with a maximum preapproved escalation factor for two additional one-year options is the current arrangement. It is estimated that the Districts will require approximately 1760 hours per year of crew time at an estimated average cost of$170.00 per hour, plus various drafting and licensed surveyor services necessary for locating existing or new sewers, or preparing new easement deeds, for a total estimated cost of$360,000.00 annually. The staff is therefore recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate surveying service agreements to provide construction and other survey needs. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed agreements will be presented to the Boards for consideration. -8- April 13, 1994 9(i): AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND NEGOTIATE AGREEMENTS FOR SOILS, CONCRETE AND OTHER MATERIALS TESTING SERVICES FOR VARIOUS COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS(SPECIFICATION NO. P-1511. Soils, concrete and materials testing services for Districts' construction projects are currently provided by private firms under contracts approved in July 1991. These services include testing of soils, concrete and asphalt; specialty testing, which includes offsite inspection for pipe, fiberglass and other structures; and the testing of specialty material and nonferrous materials. The Directors have previously authorized four soils, concrete and materials testing multiyear service contracts, all of which will expire in July 1994. A one-year contract with a maximum, preapproved escalation factor for two additional one-year options is the current arrangement. It is estimated that the Districts will require approximately 5000 hours per year of crew time at an estimated average cost of$45.00 per hour plus various laboratory analysis and testing services necessary for preparing test results and reports, for a total of$225,000.00 annually for construction materials testing on our projects. The staff is therefore recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate materials testing agreements to provide the necessary construction support services. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed agreements will be presented to the Boards for consideration. DISTRICT 7 90): AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF ORANGE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AGENCY FOR ADJUSTMENT OF MANHOLES. The Orange County Environmental Management Agency (OCEMA) has undertaken a "Special Maintenance Program 1993-1994", which consists primarily of resurfacing or reconstructing existing streets which lie in their area of responsibility. County Sanitation District No. 7 owns and maintains sewer systems in some of the areas slated for resurfacing. This will require the adjustment of the District's manholes at the District's expense. However, OCEMA has agreed to include the coordination and adjustment of the District's manholes in their contract. The projects include 84 manholes, depending on bids, at a maximum cost of$220 each and a minimum cost of -9- April 13, 1994 $155.00. This amount includes 10% for inspection and administrative costs. A deposit for the work is required in the amount of$18,840.00. Similar agreements between the District and OCEMA over the last ten years have been very successful. Staff therefore requests authorization to execute an agreement with the Orange County Environmental Management Agency for the adjustment of District's manholes at a maximum cost of$220.00 each, for a total amount not to exceed $18,840.00. 9(k): RECEIVE, FILE AND INITIATE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION NO, 148. CRAWFORD HILLS ANNEXATION (TRACT NO. 13529 AND TRACT NO. 13913) TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO-Z. The District has received a request from BA (Bank of America) Properties Inc. to annex 128.734 acres of territory in the vicinity northeast of the intersection of Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road in the City of Orange. The property is currently uninhabited. This annexation is in accordance with the terms of the negotiated agreement with the County of Orange re AB B tax exchange for annexing properties. Staff recommends approval of the resolution attached to the agenda material initiating proceedings for Annexation No. 148-Crawford Hills Annexation (Tract No. 13529 and Tract No. 13913) to County Sanitation District No. 7. 11: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FISCAL POLIC:]L EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on March 16, 1994 and the Executive Committee met on March 23, 1994. Enclosed for the Directors are written reports on their deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 12: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are authorized by law to be discussed and acted upon in a session that is closed to the public. All items to be discussed at this meeting are listed under Agenda Item No. 12 unless a matter has arisen subsequent to posting the agenda. -10- April 13, 1994 DISTRICT 2 30: APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION OF CYPRESS AVENUE BTR NK SEWER CONTRACT NO - -R1. The Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9, was completed in February 1961 from Yorba Linda Boulevard to Imperial Highway, following the natural drainage pattern of the area. The pipe, installed in the low-lying area of the drainage course, consists of an 18-inch VCP (vitrified clay pipe) in the lower reach and a 15-inch VCP in the upper reach. The original plans show little development adjacent to the pipe at that time. Subsequent fill from encroaching development in lower-lying areas of the drainage course has caused an overburden on the existing pipe and, as a result, the existing Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer is cracked and damaged. The line has required emergency repairs in two locations, and maintenance capabilities are limited by both development and lack of access easements. In October 1990, the Directors authorized Willdan Associates to prepare a project report to review the status of the line and make recommendations for its rehabilitation, replacement or relocation. The report recommended that the District replace the existing 18-inch VCP with a new 21-inch VCP sewer in Associated Road from Yorba Linda Boulevard to Bastanchury Road, and within Bastanchury Road from Associated Road to the Parkside Apartments. The report also recommended relocating the existing 18-inch sewer within the apartment complex to relieve the excessive surcharge conditions, and to connect to the District's existing 18-inch relief sewer constructed under the Orange Freeway per Contract No. 2-9-1. Between the Orange Freeway and Rolling Hills Drive, the line was constructed adjacent to the natural water course. Fill for development was placed on the line about 25 years ago. The Project Report recommends rehabilitation of the line by installation of an interior line or replacement of the 15-inch VCP in a new alignment which will require easements from the City of Fullerton. However, during design, it was discovered that the fill placed over the existing pipe is continuing to settle within Gillman Park, eliminating any guarantee that rehabilitation would last for the full design life. Therefore, a new alignment was chosen through the park and rehabilitation of the old line eliminated as an alternate. The new alignment requires tunneling through most of the park as a mitigation measure to protect old growth trees and the stream bed in the park. The line in the Imperial Golf Course between Rolling Hills Drive and Imperial Highway will be relocated with future development plans. The Boards of Directors approved an agreement in September 1992 with the owners of the Parkside Apartment Complex for a free easement and temporary _11- April 13, 1994 construction easement through the apartment complex, provided the District initiates construction before September 1994. The Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement with Church Engineering in August 1992 for the Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1. After the start of design, it was decided to combine flows from the Rolling Hills Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-1, into the proposed Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer at the intersection of Associated Road and Bastanchury Road to the intersection of Associated Road and Yorba Linda Boulevard. The Rolling Hills Subtrunk Sewer was scheduled for replacement in accordance with the 1989 Master Plan. Considerable cost savings for design and construction as well as minimizing public inconvenience associated with construction activities are realized toy the combination of these two projects. The initial proposed alignment in Bastanchury Road has incorporated the use of the UNOCAL wastewater disposal line as a sewage bypass line. However, this concept conflicted with industrial discharge requirements of the Source Control Division. Church Engineering, therefore, recommended an alignment to eliminate the need for sewage bypasses in Bastanchury Road. The actions appearing on the agenda are for the approval of the plans and specifications and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Contract No. 2-9-R1. The bid date is tentatively set for May 10, 1994. The engineers estimate is $1.5 million. Staff recommends approval. 31: AUTHORIZING GENERAL COUNSEL TO DEFEND DISTRICTS INTERESTS PERTAINING TO CLAIMS OF 245 PROPERTY OWNERS RE ANAHEIM HILLS LANDSLIDE. As reported in detail by General Counsel in his memorandum to the Board dated April 5, 1994 (copy enclosed with supporting agenda material), the District has received a claim from the property owners of 245 parcels of land in Anaheim Hills for damage caused by land subsidence. -12- April 13, 1994 District staff and General Counsel have been investigating and provided information to the claimants' attorney as to why the District should not be a party to this lawsuit. In the interim, all of the other named public agencies, except the County of Orange, are agreeing among themselves to not cross-file claims against each other, at least until a later date when all the facts are accurately established. -13- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS al ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 0°o n oO BOSAVE"°` v9u> iOONinM VALLEY CLL6UBNiA 93)39-912) nta SEE.2111 March 23, 1994 REPORT OF THE FXFCLITIVF COMMITTFF Meeting Date- March 27. 1994 - 530 p_m FXFCLITIVF COMMITTFF: OTHERS PRESENT: William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Director Jan Debay Charles E. Puckett Vice Joint Chairman Director Barry Denes A. B. "Buck" Catlin Past Joint Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Chris Knap, The Register Fred Barrera Chairman, District 1 John Collins Chairman, District 2 STAFF PRFSFNT: Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 John C. Cox, Jr. Chairman, District 5 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Gary Streed, Director of Finance Barry Hammond Chairman, District 7 Blake P. Anderson, Director of Technical Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Services John M. Gullixson Chairman, District 13 Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Roger Stanton County Supervisor Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of William Steiner County Supervisor Maintenance Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations ARgFN : None 1) Fiscal Policy Committee Rarommendation. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on March 16th and considered several items of business. Enclosed is a report (green) of the Committee's meeting and recommended action item, summarized as follows: Report of the Executive Committee March 23, 1994 Rernmmenrlatinn to Ret 1994-94 Annexatinn Fens at Same Amounts as 199q_9a, One-time annexation fees are charged to owners of all properties outside the Districts which desire to annex to the Districts to receive sewerage service. The fee is increased for those properties for which a tax-exchange agreement could not be negotiated with the County (a result of Proposition 13/AB 8). The fees adopted for 1993-94 by those Districts with annexable territory are as follows: 1997-94 Per Arre Annexatinn FP.e W/Tax W/O Tax District Exchange Exchange 2 $2,922 $3,908 3 3,154 4,139 5 3,054 4,084 7 2,902 3,833 11 5,190 6,252 With the exception of District 11, these are the same fees that were in effect for 1991-92 and 1992-93. Because of the impending annexation of Boise Chica, which is a very large area, District 11 opted to increase their annexation acreage fee in 1993-94. Annexations to the other Districts (Nos. 2, 3, 5 and 7) are generally very small parcels or single lots. The annexation fee resolutions approved in 1991 provide for an annual increase in the per acre fees on July 1 based upon the change in the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index for the preceding March-to-March time period. The intent of this section is to provide for automatic fee adjustments each year to reflect the increasing costs of constructing sewerage facilities. However, the policy resolutions do not allow the flexibility of not increasing the annexation fee unless the Boards take a specific action deferring the automatic increase. 2 Report of the Executive Committee March 23, 1994 The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends that the Districts with annexable territory forego the automatic annexation fee increase for fiscal year 1994-95, subject to a determination by each District relative to its particular fiscal situation. FYPrinlya CnmmntPP RernmmP.ndatlnn, The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendation of the Fiscal Policy Committee. 2) Clnsad Sassinn Ra ritigatinn and/or Parsnnnwl Matters, The Committee convened in closed session to consider matters pertaining to the following: a) Odor Control Domes - Potential Litigation Proposal b) Central Power Generation Project - Litigation Status c) MOU Negotiations with Employee Groups re: Compensation/Benefits 3) Independent Review of Constmrtinn Prniarts, At the March 9th Meeting, the Boards authorized and directed the Executive Committee to define the scope of an independent review of construction projects, including the Wastehauler Pump Station, Ocean Outfall Booster Station, Odor Control Domes and Central Power Generation, and to solicit consulting proposals to conduct the review for consideration by the Joint Boards. The Committee entered into a lengthy discussion pertaining to the scope of the proposed review and how it should be conducted. It was suggested that the work should be performed by a "Big Six" accounting firm. It was also suggested that the work should be performed by an engineering firm with expertise in design and construction of similar projects. Also discussed, was a venture of both types of firms to conduct the review. Also considered, was whether the review should be limited to the four projects in question, whether it should start with a review of the four projects and then expand to any identified issues, or whether at the outset the review should encompass a broader management study. It was pointed out that a periodic management audit for each organizational unit from time to time is good 3 f Report of the Executive Committee March 23, 1994 practice. It was also suggested that any review should include a study of organizational, reporting, accountability and communication relationships and practices. Fxamdive Committee Action, Following the discussion, a seven-member subcommittee was formed to prepare a request for proposal to submit to the "Big Six" accounting firms with the charge of analyzing the four construction projects, and specified legal issue, including an evaluation of the current Districts' organizational structure and management practices. Directors John C. Cox, Jr. (Chairman), John Collins, John Gullixson, Barry Hammond, Sal Sapien, Roger Stanton and Peer Swan volunteered to serve on the Committee. 4) EPA/CRWOCR EMAP Proposed One Time (Summer 1994 Quarterl Mndifiratinn of nistrirts' Ocean Monitoring Program, On March 25, 1994, The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) held a hearing on their proposal for a minor modification (summer 1994 quarter only) to the Districts' Ocean Monitoring Program. This is a part of a larger regional effort in the Southern California Bight (from Point Conception, above Santa Barbara, to the Mexican Border). The three other major POTWs in the bight, City and County of Los Angeles and City of San Diego, will also participate along with the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. The Southern California Bight effort is actually a part of a larger national effort called Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) The Southern California Bight Pilot Project is intended to be an overall monitoring enhancement to improve knowledge of the condition of the marine waters and the impacts of anthropogenic inputs. Although the EMAP work will substitute for some of our regular monitoring program, it is proposed that the summer 1994 quarterly monitoring effort will actually be 10% (about $30,000) more than the regular program. This is necessary to preserve our 301(h) modified NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit. The costs of the monitoring and research will be accounted for as part of the 1994-95 budget. 4 Report of the Executive Committee March 23, 1994 The staff briefly reviewed the enclosed staff report (pink) summarizing the proposed modification. This item was informational only and no action was required. 5) Amending Deferred rnmopneatinn Plan. For many years the Districts have had a deferred compensation plan for employees and Directors. During this period, the plan has been modified several times in order to conform to changes in the Tax Code or to alter the plan. Extensive regulatory changes for public agency deferred compensation plans (Section 457 plans) have been adopted by the Internal Revenue Service. The General Counsel's office has completed an exhaustive review of those changes and has drafted an amended Deferred Compensation Plan and Agreements to incorporate the required changes. No changes are proposed to the basic plan benefits and there are no financial or fiscal impacts. Directors have previously received a copy of the revised documents. Staff and General Counsel recommend that the Boards adopt the enclosed draft resolution (grey) approving the amended Deferred Compensation Plan for officers and employees. Executive Cnmmittap Rennmmendatinn, - The Executive Committee recommends adoption of the proposed resolution amending the Districts' deferred compensation plan. 6) Report nn Whirlg Usage. At the March 9th Board Meeting, staff was requested to submit a report on Districts' vehicle usage. Enclosed is the requested staff report (lavender). Fxprutive rnmmittpp Action. Following a brief discussion, the Committee continued consideration of this item to the next meeting. Enclosures i.pd..\. .W32394.rem 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS -�_ March 16, 1994 AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA ' 1080 ELLIS AVENUE ?O eO%9121 EOUMAIN VAKEY.CALIFORNIA 9272E-0127 REPORT OF THE °1Ai952z411 FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE Meeting Date: March 16. 1994 - 5:30 P.M. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Peer A. Swan, Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Don R. Griffin John M. Gullixson STAFF PRESENT: Evelyn Hart Iry Pickier J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Charles E. Puckett Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance William G. Steiner Blake P. Anderson, Director of Technical Services James A. Wahner Tom M. Dawes, Director of Engineering Ed E. Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance ABSENT: Robert J. Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Grace H. Winchell The following is a brief report on the items discussed at the meeting: 1. REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT PROGRAM MONITORING. The Committee reviewed the two Board-authorized six-month $50 million reverse repurchase agreements using the services of the County Treasurer's office. The net arbitrage earnings from these two transactions during the six months through April 1994 is guaranteed to be $838,496 by the agreements. Staff monitors the price of these two FNMA securities (tan weekly summary copy enclosed) using the on-line Bloomberg financial system authorized by the Boards, and periodically reviews the program with the County Treasurer. As of the Committee meeting date, the value of each security was as follows: I IO.No. Rollover Reversal Rate Coupon Arbitrage Market Price 31364AYT3 04/28/94 3.25% 5.10% 1.85% 9930/22 31364AH62 05/02/94 3.30% 4.94% 1.64% 9916/32 Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee m Page 2 March 16, 1994 Committee Action The Committee directed staff to initiate the process to continue this program at the rollover date. Staff will report on that process at the April meeting. 2. VARIABLE RATE BORROWING MONITORING. At the last meeting, the Committee asked staff to report about the impact of Federal Reserve Board actions on the Districts' borrowing program. The effects are felt on the variable interest rates for the A and C Certificate of Participation ICOP) issues which are reset daily, and on the Taxable Commercial Paper Program. The Committee reviewed a "Rate History Report" from the on-line Bloomberg financial reporting system authorized by the Boards, which listed the daily interest rate on the two COP issues for 1994. The last action by the Federal Reserve Board was February 4, 1994. Information for these issues from their issue date through March 16, 1994, is summarized in the following: Series A Serles Issue Size $100,000,000 $98,500,000 Issue Date December 5, 1990 September 1, 1992 Lowest Interest: Rate 1.00% 1.00% Dates 1/14-15/92, 7/2.8192 1/6-13/93, 6/13/93, 1/5-6/94 116-13193, 6/13/93, 1/5-6/94 Highest Interest: Rate 9.75% 4.25% Dates 12/28-30190 12/31/93, 1/1-2/94 Wt. Average Rate 2.74% 2.14% The $50 million Taxable Commercial Paper Program (TCPP) is different from the COP program in several ways, including the interest rate intervals. In the TCPP, portions of the $50 million mature on different dates and the interest rates change with each maturity, resale, and revised term length. The current status of the program follows. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 3 March 16, 1994 Maturity Date Term Par Amount Interest Rate 3/21/94 33 Days $10,000,000 3.40% 3/21/94 33 Days 11000,000 3.45 3/25194 29 Days 4,000,000 3.45 4/04194 28 Days 7,000,000 3.60 4/21/94 64 Days 28,000,000 3.40 550.000.000 aA2-% 11 3. CORF 1994-95 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS. The "2020 VISION' Master Plan adopted by the Directors in 1989 provided a schedule of facilities needed to meet projected wastewater treatment needs for thirty years. Each year these projections are reevaluated by staff in light of current flow requirements, required levels of treatment, both in terms of compliance with higher environmental standards imposed by regulatory agencies as well as growth within the service area, and economic conditions, and a 10-year capital outlay revolving fund (CORF) budget for jointly owned treatment facilities is prepared. The Committee reviewed two preliminary 1994-95 CORF Budget schedules in the amount of $65.0 million, down from $70.0 million in 1993-94, from $80.6 million in 1992-93, and from $114.1 million in 1991-92. The schedules included 10-year projections, costs to complete the "2020 VISION" Master Plan and costs attributable to replacement/rehabilitation, improved treatment and additional capacity. The Committee directed staff to make certain modifications to the proposed CORF Budget for 1994-95 for inclusion in the overall Joint Works Budget scheduled to be considered by the Committee at its May meeting. 4. 1994-95 SEWER SERVICE AND CONNECTION FEES. The Committee reviewed a staff report and individual District cash flow projections regarding sewer service fees for 1994-95. Committee Action The Committee requested additional information from the staff and asked staff to revise the financial projections to reflect property tax revenues used to pay Off debt service in the capital funds instead of the operating funds. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 4 March 16, 1994 5. 1994-95 ANNEXATION FEES. One-time annexation fees are charged to owners of all properties who desire to annex to the Districts to receive sewerage service. The fee is increased for those properties for which a tax-exchange agreement cannot be negotiated with the County (a result of Proposition 13/AB 8). The fees adopted for 1993-94 by those Districts with annexable territory follow: Per Acre Annexation Fee W%Yex "W/O Tax' District Exchange Exchange 2 $2,922 $3,908 3 3,154 4,139 5 3,054 4,084 7 2,902 3,883 11 5,190 6,252 With the exception of District 11, these are the same fees that were in effect for 1991-92, 1992-93 and 1993-94. Because of the impending Boise Chica annexation which is a very large area, District 11 opted to allow their annexation acreage fee to increase in 1993-94. Annexations to the other Districts (Nos. 2, 3, 5 and 7) are generally very small parcels or single lots. The annexation fee policy resolutions approved in 1991 provide for an annual increase in the per acre fee on each July 1, based upon the change in the Engineering News Record (ENR) Construction Cost index for the preceding March-to-March time period. The intent of this section is to provide for automatic fee adjustments each year to reflect the increasing costs of constructing sewerage facilities. Based upon the change in the ENR index from the last fee change to March 1994, the fees for 1994-95, including a three-year adjustment for Districts 2, 3, 5 and 7, would be calculated to be: Per Acre Annexation Fee W/Tax W/O Tax District Exchange 'Exchange 2 $3,190 $4,267 3 3,443 4,513 5 3,334 4,453 7 3,163 4,234 11 5,283 6,364 _ Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 5 March 16, 1994 Staff reported that a literal reading of the 1991 resolutions does not allow the flexibility of not increasing the annexation fee unless the Boards take a specific action deferring the automatic increase. The Committee compared this item to their previous discussion regarding sewer service and connection fees for 1994-95. These are fees charged for the annual use of the sewer system, or the one-time connection to the sewer, for properties currently within the Districts' boundaries. Annexation fees, however, are for properties outside the Districts' boundaries. Committee Recommendation The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends that the Districts with annexable territory forego the automatic annexation fee increase for fiscal year 1994-95, subject to a determination by each District relative to its particular fiscal situation. 6. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN DAILY EFFORT (PRIDE). During the past few months, several PRIDE suggestions have been submitted for consideration and evaluation. The review has been completed and recommendations for certificates and cash awards totaling $600.00 in accordance with the Board-approved PRIDE program, are summarized in the enclosed staff report (lavender). 7. FUTURE MEETING DATES. As discussed last month, one of the Fiscal Policy Committee's major responsibilities is to oversee the preparation of the Joint Works Operating and Capital Budgets. These budgets are presented to the Executive Committee in May of each year. Historically, the Fiscal Policy Committee has met monthly during the Joint Works Budget preparation process. Accordingly, Committee meetings have been tentatively scheduled on the standard third Wednesday of each month for April 20th and May 18th; and jointly with the Executive Committee on May 25, 1994, the fourth Wednesday. GGS:Ic KFJ:IMPGGNIMFPC.WG%rt ." Enclosures -'* COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS March 11, 1994 el ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10044 ELLIS AVENUE 10.90%9121 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAUFORNIA 92728-0127 71.1952.2411 STAFF REPORT PROPOSED PRIDE AWARDS During the past few months, several Personal Responsibility in Daily Effort (PRIDE) proposals have been evaluated. Following is a summary of those safety proposals that staff recommends for certificates and cash awards, in accordance with the Board-approved PRIDE program. The six recommended awards total $600.00. PRIDE No. 306 - FILTRATE SAFETY SHIELDS. This suggestion proposes the installation of corrugated fiberglass sheets to prevent filtrate (concentrated sewage) from coming into contact with operators. Currently, these operators wear protective full rain gear while cleaning the "doctor blades" on the belt presses to prevent the possibility of contact with filtrate. This suggestion improves operator safety and the proposed award to Daniel Houck is $100.00. PRIDE No. 310 - SOUTH SCRUBBER COMPLEX AND MANOMETER LIGHTING. This proposal recommends installing proper lighting to areas that are used by operators on every shift in order to record hydrogen sulphite readings. These areas are currently dark or poorly lit and could present a slip and fall hazard. Staff proposes a $100.00 cash award to David Bihl for this safety suggestion. PRIDE No. 337 - 'I HEADWORKS HEADROOM, This suggestion recommends the removal of unnecessary overhead piping located in 'I headworks at the grit chamber lower level walkway. The location of this piping causes some personnel to hit their hardhats against the overhead piping with the potential for injury. The minimum cash award of $100.00 is recommended for Lynn Redman for this safety suggestion. PRIDE NO. 343 - GRATING CLIPS FOR SAFETY-C HEADWORKS. This safety suggestion proposes the installation of retainer clips on grating covers that personnel walk on in the area of the main sewage pumps. This will eliminate the potential movement of the grates which could result in potential injury to personnel. As cash award of $100.00 is recommended for this safety suggestion. Proposed PRIDE Awards J` Page 2 March 11, 1994 t PRIDE NO. 346 - TRUNK LINES SAMPLE CUP HOLDERS. This safety recommendation proposes that a sample cup holder be placed at each trunk line sampling location. Currently, the same sample cup holder and rope is carried from one trunk line location to another, thereby increasing the chance that the operator will come into contact with the sampled sewage. Staff recommends a cash award of $100.00 to Hylan Harrison for this safety related recommendation. PRIDE NO. 347 - COUPLING SHAFT STRIPPING. By painting the shaft or coupling unit of each pump a contrasting yellow and black color, the operators are able to easily ascertain if the pump is operating from a safe distance. At the present time, the operator must view the pump up close which may result in potential injury to the operator. This suggestion improves safety and an award of $100.00 is proposed for Larry Berger. GGS:Ic PEF:J:1W PDOgFPC.MfG\PPoUE&t81 r r Review of Construction Projects r r r r r r r March 1994 r r r r TABLE OF CONTENTS r 1 . Copies of Correspondence Between The Register and the Districts r 2. Copies of Documents Requested by The Register r A. Wastehauler Pump Station r B. Ocean Outfall Booster r C. Odor Control Domes D. Central Power Generation Engines r 3. Newspaper Articles 4. Staff Reports r r r r r r r r r Copies of Correspondence Between The Register and The Districts ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER r 200 West 'Santa Ana Blvd. Suite 760 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Phone: 285-2862 Fax: 973-4940 Feb. 02, 1994 r Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering r, Orange County Sanitation Districts Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 'r Dear Tom: This is a request to look at district engineering records which r are open under the California Public Records Act. I am requesting this information by letter because of the length and complication of the request. Here 's what I 'm looking for : `tl * Wastehauler Station, Fountain Valley 1. Documents showing who designed and who built the station; when these contracts were let and how much they were worth `+ 2 . Agency reports or memos explaining problems that have kept the station from operating. 3 . Documents detailing all repair efforts made to get the station r operational; plus costs of each. These should include details of the current repair efforts . 4. Memos detailing any efforts to recover costs from the original designer or contractor . r * Aluminum domes over the primary clarifiers at Plant one and Two. 1. Documents showing who designed and built the domes and how much the contracts were worth. 2. Documents showing how much, if any, has been recovered from these firms for defects in construction. Is any such effort r underway? 3. Documents detailing any plan, project, or discussion of reconstructing the domes, including the estimated cost . Central Generation Project 1. Documents showing who designed, who built, and who oversaw this project and how much each was paid. r 2 . Documents detailing the three-party agreement that would have settled the dispute over engine damage on this project. 3 . Documents showing why this agreement was abandoned . r * Outfall Booster Station controls 1. Documents showing who designed and who built this project and how much each was paid. r' 2 . Documents detailing operational problems with the station con- trols, efforts to relocate the controls, and the cost of each r r such effort, including all agency analyses of these problems . 3 . Documents showing the scope of any planned or, ongoing project to replace the computer controls with manual units, including actual or estimated costs. r 4 . Documents detailing efforts to recover cost of these retrofits, if any. I would be remiss if I did not take this opportunity to thank you for your professionalism and courtesy during previous requests for public information. I trust that you will provide the requested Information with the same dispatch. r Sincerely, '�nl Chris Knap Staff Writer r cc : Mr . Wayne Sylvester General Manager r r r r r r r r r LUUIN 1 I 0AIN1 1 H 11V1V L13 1 Kll. 1 J I S " OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 c9'xce cW��x (714)962-2411 February 14, 1994 .. Mr. Chris Knap The Orange County Register 625 N. Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92701 RE: Public Records Act Request for Documents This letter acknowledges receipt of your letter dated February 2, 1994. The Districts will need an additional period of time pursuant to Government Code r Section 6256.1 to respond to your request for records. The need for additional time is based on: .� a. The fact that your request will require the need to search for and collect the requested records in other department facilities that are separate from this office; b. Your request creates the need to search for and examine a voluminous amount of separate and distinct records. r The way the calendar fell, there has been only five working days since the receipt of your request. It should also be noted that nearly all records have already been made available to you during your examination of Districts' records at the Districts' office on February 9, 10, and 14, 1994. The balance are needing review and approval of Districts' legal counsel due to pending and possible litigation relating to the central generation and dome covers projects. Accordingly, the Districts will respond to our request on or before February 26, 1994. J BY a ylvester neral nager Y,1 JWS:eyr rl COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS =/ \ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-701e (714)962.2411 =r February 15, 1994 ' r Mr. Chris Knap Orange County Register 625 North Grand Avenue Santa Ana, Ca. 92701 Re: Public Records AM for Documents r Dear Mr. Knap: This letter will confirm the status of the Districts' response to your letter request under the r California Public Records Act dated February 2, 1994, received by the Districts on February 3, 1994. The references below are to the four identified projects and the numerical statement of documents requested. r WASTEHAULER STATION FOUNTAIN VALLEY, JOB NO, P146-1 1. All documents were provided to you. 2. All documents were provided to you. 3. All documents were provided to you. 4. There are no memoranda detailing efforts to recover costs from the original designer .. or contractor. The documents provided to you contain the staff reports and evaluations concluding that there was neither design nor construction error. r ALUMINUM DOME COVERS -PRIMARY CLARIFIERS. PLANT NOS. 1 and 2 JOB NOS, P1.25 AND P2-32 ^+ 1. All documents were provided to you. 2. There are no documents showing any amounts being recovered from firms for defects in construction. The Office of General Counsel is acting to complete its investigation and initiation of legal actions to recover losses pursuant to direction from the Boards of Directors. 3. All documents were provided to you. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS r of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA 1 WY EWS AVENUE FCUhnNN VALLEY.MWO.M<92,28 012, Page Two February 15, 1994 CENTRAL GENERATION PROJECT. JOB NO. J•19 m T. All documents were provided to you. 2. All documents were provided to you. 3. The Three-Parry Agreement is not and has not been abandoned. It is in full force and effect. OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION CONTROLS, JOB NO. J•15 1. All documents were provided to you. 2. All documents were provided to you in the form of all files relative to this project. The memoranda contain an explanation of the items requested. 3. All documents were provided to you. 4. There are no documents detailing efforts to recover costs of these retrofits. Pursuant to demand by the Districts, General Electric provided engineering and remedial work and services at no cost to the Districts as part of the resolution of problems experienced with the control system. As noted, during your onshe inspection of records at the Districts'office on February 9th, 1Oth, 14th and 15th, 1994, the Districts provided the files containing all the documents identified in your February 2nd letter from both the Board Secretary and the Engineering Department. To the best of our ability and knowledge, all records have been supplied and the requests have been fully satisfied. Corinne Clawson 1., Public Information Officer CC/tlw/pj � 2�Tlfq r e ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER 200 Kest Santa Ana Blvd. Suite 760 Santa Ana, CA 92701 . . Phone : 285-2862 Fax: 973-4940 .. Feb. 15, 1994 r, Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Thomas H. Davos, Director of Engineering - - Orange County Sanitation Districts Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Dear Sirs: r Thank you for allowing me to view on this date many of the public records requested in my Feb,. 2 letter under the California Public ,r Records Act. I take the provision of these records as a show of good faith by your agency. - A small concern has been raised by the verbal representations of your employee, Corinne Clawson, who suggested on this date that " there could be a further delay of several days in the provision of certain copies requested. May I remind you of Government Coda 6257 which says copies of public records shall be made "promptly ,r available " upon request. I am puzzled by the suggestion by Ms. Clawson that these records must be examined a second time by your attorney prior to release . secondly, I must notify you that your agency has not provided all r of the information sought . some . records known to exist have not been made available. I remind you of Government Code 6255, which requires a justification for withholding any records; and of Code Sections 6268 and 6259, which allow for injunctive relief and contempt of court findings for the improper withholding of records . Here is a list of missing information: WASTEHAULER STATION: No documents were provided detailing agency meetings in 1991 at which maintenance and warranty problems were discussed by engineering and operations staff. CLARIFIER DOMES: No records . were provided detailing efforts by " agency personnel to assess blame for the aluminum corrosion. Farther, the district provided an ambiguous and non-responsive answer to the question of whether any effort to recover repair costs �+ is underway. If such an effort exists, please provide documents _ detailing it. CENTRAL GENERATION PROJECT: Contractor Brinderson referenced in „ letters to the district an effort to settle the engine damage problem without a trial . The district proceeded to trial anyway before an arbitration panel. What were the settlement offers by Brinderson and Cooper that would have prevented a trial? OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION: No documents were provided detailing the relocation of computer controls to avoid interference from electro- magnetic flux. No cost estimates were provided for replacement of the non-performing Fisher-Porter controls with new programmable logic controllers . No agency or consultant analyses of these problems were included. Please provide documents showing an analysis of these problems, Including the analyses performed by in-house expert George 1tl Thuro or any Outside consultants . _ . Knowing of your agency's oft-stated open records position, I am certain that you will quickly provide these documents or a legal justification for withholding them. Sincerely, Chris xnap Stdff Writer cc: Corinne Clawson m r r r r r r ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER 200 West Santa Ana Blvd. Suite 760 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Phone : 285-2862 Fax: 973-4940 Feb. 16, 1994 r Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Dear Sir : As you are aware, The Register is preparing a story about r engineering problems at your agency. First of all, be assured that we wish to include your point of view and that of your agency and plan to include it at the top of our story, as well as at other appropriate points throughout. We believe it would be preferable if you would agree to sit down with me, prior to noon Friday, and discuss recent engineer- Ing problems in a face-to-face interview. Our experience Is that such interviews provide more frank and less stilted re- sponses, and place the subject in a more flattering context than do written answers, which often carry the flavor of a prepared text. r As a longtime public servant, please consider being interviewed in this fashion. The Register has no objection if you wish to have any aide or advisor present, or tape the interview, or take any other measures you deem necessary. I do plan to tape the interview myself in the interest of accurate - - reproduction of your comments . Thank you in advance for a prompt response to this request. r Sincerely, Chris Knap Y Staff Writer r r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 February 16, 1994 .. February 17, 1994 (Revised) Mr. Chris Knap Orange County Register .. 625 North Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92701 Dear Mr. Knap: The Districts are in receipt of your letter dated February 15, 1994, delivered to the Districts by facsimile on February 15, 1994 at 11:22 p.m.; and your letter dated February 16, 1994, hand delivered and stamped in today in our mail room at 11:09 a.m. We are continuing to not only comply with the legal requirements relating to public records availability, but to in fact extend a cooperative effort to assist you in gathering information for a story that you are attempting to prepare, detailing, as you describe it, 'engineering problems at your agency'. We will continue to act in the cooperative manner that we have in the past, but wish to make clear certain points relating to the rights and obligations of the Districts, as well as to the public that we serve. ' 1. Because one of the four projects has been the subject of active litigation and a second one is potentially to be the subject of litigation in the immediate future, the Districts are acting in accordance with their legal rights to protect the interests of the Districts and the public, and in doing so is seeking advice and counsel from the Districts' General Counsel. This may in fact include his review and examination of the files a second or even more times prior to release. Even with that limitation, we will in fact comply with the deadlines to produce the records for you. 2. The Districts are well aware of the legal provisions of the California Public Records Act, and we have received the active participation and advice of the Districts' legal counsel in this regard. We are not in need of receiving advice or admonition from outside sources, including the Register, as to remedies such as injunctive relief and contempt of court findings. 3. Each of the four projects which you have been investigating are extraordinarily large and + complex, which took place over several years for the master planning, specific design, construction and ultimate operation. The input to make complete these projects was provided by numerous outside consultants, together with the active participation by several of the Districts' Departments m and professional employees. 4. You have, by your letters dated February 2 and February 15, 1994, made very specific identifiable requests in most instances, for which we have provided you the corresponding specific identifiable responses. In furtherance of satisfying your inquiry, we have supplied to you well over 100 file folders of information. We believe we have provided everything you have requested, but in response to your February 15, 1994 letter, we supply the additional information relative to the four projects. re COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICTS r b ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Mr. Chris Knap - Page Two 1O EWS AvEME February 16, 1994 los=eln February17, 1994 (Revised) - FCUMAM VAU ,MWORMA etned127 9m9e24411 .r 5. RE WASTEHAULER STATION. This project was a matter involving input from differing m Departments within the Districts. In response to your request, we provided to you the engineering records that you requested, and believe that the records contained information concerning agency meetings in 1991. Notwithstanding, we are continuing to inquire of others to ascertain whether other records are in fact available, and if so, we will advise you immediately, so that you may review them. This inquiry on our part will be completed by the February 28, 1994 deadline. 6. RE CLARIFIER DOMES. The files provided to you contain some information concerning r efforts to establish the causes of defects or failures in the systems installed. We are not aware of any document that is designed to "assess blame" as you have requested. The Districts' respectfully disagree with your assertion that their letter of February 15. 1994, is ambiguous and nonresponsive r with regards to efforts to recover repair costs. The staff reports outlining problems, together with project reports for the rehabilitation, have been supplied to you, and the overall matter has been referred to the Office of General Counsel, who has undertaken his own investigation. The records of the General Counsel are a matter of attorney/client privilege and are not required to be disclosed. Those matters will not be disclosed, except as part of any legal proceedings that may be initiated or upon completion of any such litigation. 7. RE CENTRAL POWER GENERATION PROJECT. Your question, 'what were the settlement offers by Brinderson and Cooper that would have prevented a trial?' is based on an -- incorrect assumption. There were no settlement offers tendered by either Brinderson or Cooper; and accordingly, no records to that effect exist. Any discussions on, before or during the course of the legal proceedings were entered into with counsel for the Districts, are subject to attorney/client privilege, are not required to be disclosed, and will not be disclosed, if any in fact occurred. .1 8. RE OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION. We are not specifically aware of the specific documents that you appear to have knowledge of. As noted above, the projects are extremely complex. Due to vacations of key personnel, as well as a need to make inquiry of the various Departments of the Districts as to the existence of such records, we are unable to respond to this question at this time. We are actively seeking to discover further records and will advise you prior - to the February 28, 1994 deadline. 9. We are sure that you appreciate our facilities are very sophisticated and complex. It is a $1.5 billion system, and no one person is able to fully evaluate and answer or respond to all questions or issues. Our employees are extremely busy in managing the day-to-day activities of our program of wastewater management and environmental protection; and as I have previously discussed with you, we have streamlined our public information and media relations to be as efficient and as responsive to public and media questions and requests for information as we can. Therefore, towards that end and in response to your request for personal interviews with Districts' management and staff, your questions ` should instead be directed to me, as Public Information Officer, and I will see that they get to the right people. We will then answer your questions in writing to the best of our ability. In this manner, we can assure that you most expeditiously receive the best and most accurate answers possible. numu aawder-, Corinne Clawson ` Public Information Officer CC:jt -, L-!7-94 1HU 11 :45 U. C. ikAI:tN rex NU. 04JdUbU r. Ui r ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER 200 West Santa Ana Blvd . a, Suite 760 Santa Ana, CA 92701 - Phone : 285-2862 Fax: 973-4940 Feb. 17, 1994 .ry Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts Box 8127 d Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Dear Mr. Sylvester: Thank you for considering a response to the following questions about recent engineering and design problems at the district 's two plants . It would be most beneficial if the response could come from, and he signed by, you personally. If you can provide answers by noon Friday, we will be able to include your responses prominently in our story. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. GENERAL QUESTIONS 1. By The Register 's calculations, the costs of repairs, redesign and reconstruction on the four projects referenced in the Register 's letter of Feb. 2 total 820 to $25 million. Is this an unusually large amount of problems? Are these problems typical of projects at the san- itation districts? Are they typical of problems at all public agencies? 2. Please rate the quality of the in-house engineering expertise provided by your staff. Please rate the quality of the consulting engineers hired on these four projects . m 3 . Were Advanco Constructors, Brown and Caldwell, and John Carollo Engineers given special consideration because of their gifts to various agency personnel? WASTENAULER STATION 4 . You have signed reports to the directors saying that debris dumped in this station's waste was an unknown problem during design. The Register has obtained memos showing that the designers warned your engineers about debris that could clog the pumps in 1989, but your engineers overruled them. Did the engineers not tell you about this warning? d DOME CORROSION 5. Why has the district not sued Advance Constructors and/or Malcolm Pirnie to recover the costs of repairing dome corrosion? FU-17-94 THU 11 :43 0.G. REGMER FAX NO. 5438050 P. 02 .d CENTRAL POWER PROJECT r 6. Why was Brown and Caldwell not named in the lawsuit to recover costs, in consideration of their allegedly faulty design of the lube oil filters? .d 7. Bow much in damages has the district sought, from each entity, at trial before the arbitration panel? r OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION: 6 . Do the electromagnetic flux and harmonics problems at the OOBS indicate a bad design? Bad equipment? 9 . Bow much will it cost to replace the computer controls for the outfall pumps? To integrate the system with the plantwide computers? Thanks eosin for your response. 'r FSincerely, Chris Knap Staff Writer ed m a m r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA F.O. sox 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-9127 108"ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92709-7018 +r�E ouM� (714) 982-2411 February 18, 1994 (Revised) Mr. Chris Knap Orange County Register 200 West Santa Ana Boulevard, Suite 760 Santa Ana, CA 92701 Dear Mr. Knap: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter dated February 17, 1994. First, we would suggest that you not set artificial response deadlines. These are technical issues. It takes time to access the information and the people necessary to provide responses to the questions and they are not always immediately available. This is an agency with an enormous task and our people have significant on-going and pressing commitments and responsibilities to fulfill in managing it. Our first responsibility is to assure that we continue to safely, effectively and efficiently manage the processing of 240 million gallons of sewage a day and to carry out our programs of environmental and public health protection. Within this context, as we have previously told you, we will respond to your requests as quickly and accurately as we can. ® We are pleased to answer six of your nine questions at this time. The answers below are numbered to cross-reference the numbered questions in your February 17th letter. The remaining questions will be answered as soon as the appropriate information and people can be accessed. 1. The Register's calculations of the costs of repairs, redesign and reconstruction are incorrect and grossly over-estimated. Remedial work is usually incorporated as one element of a much larger project containing multiple jobs. It appears as if the Register may have incorrectly used total project costs rather than just the cost of the remedial work. Please provide us with your calculations so we can assist you in identifying where you are incorrect. L� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS W ORANGE fANNFY. GIIFORNIA Mr. Chris Knap 10BCa EW6 AV E ® P.D.BOX 91V February 18, 1994 (Revised) nw WN VAIlEV.r VMAMAB "841'M Page 2 914)EE2.2411 Sewage treatment plants are complex,sophisticated facilities with extensive ® and major electro-mechanical facilities and chemical and biological processes. Every reasonable effort is made to design, construct and operate facilities in a trouble-free manner. But this is not a perfect world. Problems are sometimes encountered. Who, for example, has purchased a car or home and not had some problem that requires remedial work. Translate that into our treatment works which are many, many times more complicated. To expect to design, build and operate a system with a current value of $1.3 billion and not experience some problems is simply unrealistic, anywhere. Notwithstanding the pragmatic odds, we have award winning plants - as fine as any around. Quite frankly, our record is remarkably successful. We stack up most favorably with comparable facilities and we are very proud of that. The Districts are the only major agency in the nation d to receive a 3O1(h) waiver that enables us to save Orange County's ratepayers $50 million per Year. 2. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County have received numerous awards of excellence. Our wastewater management program is second to none, and we are recognized as one of the most outstanding publicly owned treatment works in the entire nation. The Districts consistently meet and exceed environmental and public health standards and regulations and our principal goal of protecting metropolitan Orange County's coastal marine resources. We have not had the problems with construction of facilities, operations or maintenance that other similar agencies have experienced. Our many accomplishments are the direct result of our team of directors, staff and consultants. We believe our record speaks for itself. 3. Advanco Constructors, Brown and Caldwell or John Carollo Engineers, or any other contractors or engineers, have never been given special consideration in any manner, for any reason, on any project. A. 5. The Districts, by their letters of February 15 and February 16, 1994, have previously advised that this matter has been referred to the Districts' Legal Counsel. Any determination as to potential parties to said litigation are confidentially protected as an attorney/client privilege, and any disclosure would be irresponsible until the legal action is filed as a matter of record. .d COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CAaFORNIA Mr. Chris Knap 1O E SAV E February 18, 1994 (Revised) _ P60OXBlZ wu�rtaw Va ,rn Mw a 127 Page 3 6 & 7. There has been no determination that there was any faulty or otherwise defective design of the lube oil filters by the design engineers. Determination as to parties to be included in any legal proceedings must be, and in this case was in fact, based upon established facts as of the date of commencing proceedings. The Districts have advised both the engine manufacturer and the construction contractor that they were holding both parties entirely responsible for the payment of all costs, expenses and losses incurred by the Districts relative to the engine failure. The Districts' initiated d legal proceedings expressly seeking to recover those monetary sums and would hopefully receive a judicial arbitration award accordingly. Corinne Clawson Public Information Officer d. CC:eyr r r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 xcc cam^ (714)962-2411 W February 24, 1994 Mr. Chris Knap .d The Orange County Register 625 N. Grand Avenue Santa Ana, CA 92701 - Dear Mr. Knap: w We are pleased to provide you with the following responses to the balance of your February 17, 1994 questions. The answers are numbered to cross-reference the numbered questions in your February 17th letter. x. 4. The preferable system has always been gravity flow. However, as pointed out in 1989, physical interferences prevented construction of a gravity waste pipeline and dictated the need for a pump station. The engineers knew that there was debris in the trucked waste. The issue was discussed between designers and staff and installation of comminutors was considered but discarded because of the very high costs of maintaining such equipment. The designers and staff decided v that the problem could be addressed by including an extra pump and other measures. However, excessive volumes of debris over what was expected are being experienced which has resulted in unusually high — maintenance costs. The pump station worked, but the cleaning costs were too high, thus it is not economical to operate it. The current project included an analysis of adding additional equipment to handle the ,r debris, but we developed a new idea on how to install the preferred flushing gravity system to reduce the high maintenance cost associated with this type of equipment and the overall system costs in the long run. The General Manager is not involved in engineering matters and, accordingly, was not aware of the engineering discussions or decisions. ,w 8. Electromagnetic fluxand harmonics do not necessarily indicate either bad design or equipment. The direct current electromagnetic flux was not u - m COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA s IM44 ELLIS AVENUE vn eax eIQ7+xv FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92720.8127 ey Mr. Chris Knap O1<19.2.2A++ _ February 24, 1994 Page 2 m anticipated, and interfered with the color monitors. The monitors were .+ moved which eliminated the problem. The harmonics found after the facility was built were greater than anticipated, but were corrected by the contractor at no added cost to the Districts. The ocean outfall •^ booster station drives, motors and pumps work very well as evidenced by the station's performance during intense storm conditions over the past few years. w 9. You have called the Fischer Porter system "non-performing". That is not the case; it is working and has been in operation for about five years. Districts' staff considered options of keeping the Fischer Porter system, with needed upgrades, or building a new system. We have experienced problems obtaining parts to keep the existing system operating. The cost to replace the Fischer Porter system is $134,000. However, since this is one of the most critical facilities the Districts' operate, it was decided that a newer,upgraded state-of-the-art PLC-based system would " be more reliable, and is the recommended choice. It will have added -- graphics, include the adjacent Central Power Generation facility, and tie into the plant monitoring system. The new outfall pump control system r is under design, and it is estimated that it will cost about $350,000. w, The new expansion to integrate the system with the plant-wide system is not a replacement. It is part of an overall plant-wide enhancement. The integration will add about $50,000. r Following are your February 22, 1994 inquiries and the Districts' responses: Register: In terms of the $20-25 million number in my questions, I am unable to write out my numbers without giving you a copy of the whole story, which I cannot do, so if you will give me your numbers, we will verify ours. a. r r er r" r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA r fO E"MW. AVENUE 10 vo W.8127 i011NTNN VAUFY.CAIKORNN 92729-9121 r Mr. Chris Knap nuI992.2n1 February 24, 1994 Page 3 r Response: "The costs of remedial work on the various projects have not been r determined because it is in various stages of completion. Our most current estimates are: Wastehauler Station $300,000 Dome Covers $500,000 A decision on litigation to recover costs is pending. Ocean Outfall Booster $350,000 Includes upgrades and Station Controls conversiontostate-of-the- r art PLC system. (The above amounts to 2.5 percent of the project costs, 1.4 percent if we .d decide to litigate the domes and are successfuLl - On February 23rd the central powergeneration engine damage arbitration panel issued its decision. Brinderson Corporation, the installation contractor was found to be 100% responsible for damages and was ordered to pay the restoration costs of Cooper and the Districts and to absorb its own share of the w, costs. The Districts and Cooper have been absolved of any responsibility for the problem or the restoration costs. r The Districts claimed approximately $1.5 million as its share of the costs to investigate and repair the engines and received an award for that amount to be paid by Brinderson. Cooper claimed approximately $2. 1 million as its share of the costs to repair the engines and received an award for that amount to be paid by Brinderson. Because of the way the agreements were structured, Brinderson was ordered to pay the Districts the $2. 1 million awarded to Cooper and the Districts will pay it to Cooper. w ._ Brinderson claimed approximately $2.3 million as its share of the costs to repair the engines but was awarded nothing. As noted above, they must pay $3.6 million to Cooper and the Districts. w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS e1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA r tOBAa ELUB VENO* PO B0X B122 FOUNTYN VALLEY.CLL111300fiA 92728.8127 Mr. Chris Knap 01AI0623R1 _ February 24, 1994 Page 4 Legal costs were not recoverable and were absorbed by the respective parties. In the case of the Districts this amounts to $453,000, including $79,000 for court costs." Register: What percentage of Orange County homes are served by the O.C. Sanitation Districts? Response: "The Districts presently serve approximately 87 percent of the County's population. " Register: I have heard conflicting budget numbers from Sylvester (S600 million) and Streed ($200 million), which number is correct? r Response: "The Districts total annual budget is $635.9 million which includes the 1993-94 Operating and Capita/ Budget of $201 million for operation, maintenance and rehabilitation of the treatment plants and collection systems, construction appropriations for the plants and collection system, and debt -- issuance and service. The balance includes reserves for the long-range master planned facilities expansion and improvements, environmental compliance, self insurance, unspent certificates of participation proceeds and reserves required by the debt indentures, contingency and dry period funding reserves. " Register: Does Mahoney's pay drop if all individual districts do not approve the $100 compensation per Board meeting? Response: "Yes. " `+ Register: Is Tom Dawes in charge of quality control in terms of construction projects? Who makes the determination that a job is done right? Response: "Your question is subjective. There are many people with varying responsibilities involved in administering a construction contract. The construction contractor is, of course, responsible for building the project according to the plans and specifications. Our construction management division has a relatively small staff of about 40 professional, technical and r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA r lOW ELL19>VENUE A0 9o%6127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.MIN)"u 92729-9127 d Mr. Chris Knap 01n992a3n1 February 24, 1994 Page 5 a support people that monitor the installation and progress of the projects, sometimes with the help of consultants. Construction projects are certified as complete in accordance with the plans and specifications by the Districts' Construction Manager. Upon completion, the Director of Engineering NA recommends that the Boards accept the project and the Directors adopt a formal action doing so. " rr Corinne Clawson Public Information Officer AIN CC:eyr v d NA m d r r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS \ = " OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 v 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 o9^�'cc cock (714)962-2411 February 24, 1994 Mr. Chris Knap ^* The Orange County Register 625 N. Grand Avenue G Santa Ana, CA 92701 Dear Mr. Knap: This is in response to your inquiry regarding the ruling of the independent arbitration panel pertaining to responsibility for the Plant No. 2 central power generation engine damages. As you know, the independent arbitration panel found that the engine installation contractor, Brinderson Corporation, was 100% responsible for the damages and was ordered to pay the restoration costs of Cooper and the Districts and to absorb its own ' share of the costs. We were confident all along that the ruling would be in favor of the Districts and are gratified that panel of three retired judges agreed with us. Our attorneys have every reason to believe that Brinderson and their insurers will satisfy their obligations. t"I Legal costs were not recoverable and were absorbed by the respective parties. In the case of the Districts, this amounts to $453,000, including $79,000 for court costs. Obviously this was a very prudent expenditure on behalf of the Districts to protect their investment in this important multi-million dollar plant and the integrity of the engine-generator equipment. As part of the arbitration proceedings, we attempted to raise the issue of "lost power" in the amount of $2.9 million. However, the arbitrators determined that the issue was outside the scope of the agreement and did not make a ruling. This issue and potential liquidated damages assessment remain open and staff and counsel are evaluating whether to pursue them in a separate legal action. You have surmised an amount for so-called unrealized savings. As I told you, based on your characterization, we believe you are double counting. Corinne Clawson Public Information Officer CC:eyr °t*A11p"°4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS,' t OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA / \ P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 108°°ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 �^°oc coin (714)962-2411 February 28, 1994 J Mr. Chris Knap The Orange County Register 625 North Grand Avenue Santa Ana, Ca. 92701 Re: Public Records Act Request for Documents Dated February 2, 1994 V Dear Mr. Knap: > This letter will serve to acknowledge the original receipt of letter dated February 2, 1994, to recite the chronology of documentation and events that have occurred subsequent to that date, wherein documentation was provided to you, and to comply with the provisions of the California Public ., Records Act, specifically, our advice to you that all information would be provided on or before February 28, 1994. 1. By letter dated February 2, 1994 (received February 3, 1994), addressed to Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Engineering, you requested to look at the Districts' engineering records pertaining to four particular projects—namely: A. Wastehauler Station, Fountain Valley; B. Aluminum Domes Over Primary Clarifiers, Plant 1 and Plant 2; C. Central Generation Project; and D. Outfall Booster Station Controls. 2. By letter dated February 14, 1994, the General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, responded to your letter of February 2, 1994, and further noted the need for an additional period of v' time to fully respond, all as authorized by Government Code Section 6256.1. 3. As noted in the February 14, 1994 letter of Mr. Sylvester, the Districts made available „e to you, for your examination at the Districts' offices, nearly all records which you had requested. Those examinations occurred on February 9, 10 and 14, 1994. w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS If ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Page Two toau rWS AVENUE I� February 28, 1994 Ra BOX 9127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFGRNIA 9e12a.91e] pL19S2R411 4 4. By letter dated February 15, 1994 from Ms. Corinne Clawson, Public Information Officer, the Districts provided you with a detailed status of their responses to the letter request for information dated February 2, 1994. This letter provided detailed reference to each of the four projects identified in Subparagraphs A through D above. That letter concluded that to the best of the Districts' ability and knowledge, all records have been supplied. and the request has been fully ., satisfied. 5. By letter dated February 16, 1994, faxed to the Districts at 11:22 p.m., you indicated VP that there was a list of missing information for each of the four projects. In face, re Central Generation Project, you did not indicate missing documents, but merely asked a question relating to settlement offers. m 6. By letter dated February 16, 1994, and revised for a minor correction dated February 17, 1994, Ms. Corinne Clawson provided a detailed response to your letter dated February 15, 1994, as well as your hand delivered letter of February 16, 1994. Concerning your r requested records for the Wastehauler Station and Outfall Booster Station, we indicated that we were undertaking a further inquiry of personnel at the Districts to ascertain whether other records were in fact available. Please be advised that we have completed that investigation, and have determined that a, there are no additional records in existence for those two projects other than what has been previously provided to you. As noted above, you did not request additional records for the Central Power Generation Project. The question posed was answered by this letter. Be the Clarifier Aluminum Dome Covers, as previously advised, any records remaining are held by the General Counsel and are the subject of attorney/client privilege, pending the initiation of possible litigation for recovery from responsible parties. H 7. By letter dated February 17, 1994, you posed both general questions and specific questions on the four projects. It did not include any specific request for documentation. 8. By letter dated February 18, 1994, and revised same date for minor corrections, Ms. Corinne Clawson provided to you a three-page detailed response to your letter dated February 17, 1994, answering six of the nine questions. _ 9. By letter dated February 24, 1994, the Districts provided answers to the remaining three of nine questions that needed further inquiry, as indicated in the Districts' letter to you dated ,d February 18, 1994. This letter of February 24, 1994,further provided the detailed responses to your telephonic message inquiry dated February 22, 1994. 10. To the best of our knowledge this letter, combined with all the previous access to " records which you have been afforded, and the copies of records which you have specifically requested and received, now fully complies with rovisio f California Public Records Act, pursuant to your request. yne ylv ter Ge ral Man r 19T.pil AN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA m ,y R.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 March 1, 1994 v r TO: Harold Johnson, Orange County Register Editorial Section RE: Press Articles Critical of the Districts r In answer to your request for a comment on your recent articles, we have the following response: We believe The Register inaccurately and unjustly portrayed the caliber and integrity '^ of the Districts' personnel and wastewater management programs. It is an affront to our more than 600 employees and the fine public service that they perform. The County Sanitation Districts and their employees have received no less than 31 national, state and regional awards of excellence in the past five years. Our wastewater management program is second to none, and we are recognized as one of the most outstanding publicly owned treatment works in the entire nation. The Districts consistently and effectively meet and exceed environmental and public health standards, regulations and our principal goal of protecting metropolitan Orange County's coastal marine resources. We believe our outstanding record speaks for itself. Corinne Clawson Public Information Officer CC:eyr t4 y N H Ij Copies of Documents r Requested by The Register r y d r rl V y i ti L �y r y Wastehauler Pump Station T W. ti LLL r r I�. 7p 70 D -01 1. STRICTS F; 1 ^ r I V E D DATE: July 24, 1989 JUL , R tin MEETING DATE: July 19, 1989 CONSiRUC ICON MANAGEMENT PROJECT: Waste Haulers Pump Station PUNT No. I r (OCSD Job No. P1-27-2) ATTENDEES: Bob Ooten/OCSD Steve Schultz/OCSD Ed Hodges/OCSD Paul Mitchell/OCSD Bill Clarke/OCSD Jerry Wood/IWA Jack Vincent/OCSD Mark Esquer/IWA A meeting was held to discuss the project pre-design criteria, review preliminary sketches and concepts of proposed layouts, and obtain District comments. The meeting was held at the District headquarters (Plant 1) at 10: 30 a.m. Preliminary design cal- culations and sketches were passed out during the meeting. Physical interferences prevented the construction of a gravity waste pipeline to drain waste from the waste haulers facility and dictated the need for a lift station to pump trucked waste to the r discharge point. IWA presented three options for the station design of the waste haulers facility. They included a submer- sible pump system, a "can-type" package lift station with pre- cast wetwell, and a custom lift station with dry-pit, wet well layout (refer to meeting hand outs) . All options consisted of waste flows passing through a grinder/comminutor to the pumping facility, with flows discharged to either the digesters or the Sunflower trunk line (operators choice) . The meeting included discussions about flow rates, wet well storage volume, and discharge locations. The following is a review of the discussions: Comminutor. The District operations and maintenance staff stated their concerns with the grinding system, including the relatively high maintenance require- ments with comminutors or grinder pumps. Everyone agreed that grinders require high main- tenance, however, IWA expressed concern that the variety of materials dumped may cause stoppage or plugging of the pump assemblies or discharge lines (especially to the digesters as a discharge point) . ,d District maintenance inquired about the use of an additional pump, limiting the type of materials dumped at this location, and providing clean-outs as an alternative to using the grinding process. It was agreed that implementing the additional design and operational alternatives would al- leviate the need for a grinder. Recommendation of the District staff is to eliminate the grinder process. Design Criteria. IWA presented a discussion of the design criteria, including flow rates, wet well volumes and design vehicles. There are basically two design vehicles which frequent the dump site, a 1500 gallon truck and a 6000 gallon truck. Their discharge rates are 300 gpm and 400 gpm, respectively. It was discussed that two waste hauling trucks may dump simultaneously. Therefore, the inflow rates may vary from 300 gpm to 800 gpm. District staff and IWA discussed the various flow rate alternatives. It was agreed that three 500 gpm pumps would be used to convey waste flows. Wetwell volume could be sized to accommodate pump- ing criteria, or storage volume based on waste hauler truck capacity. Due to the overflow fea- ture included in the wet well, IWA recommended the use of flow rate and cycle time (pumping criteria) as the basis for design. This would reduce the required wet well volume and reduce station costs. The District then discussed the operations and maintenance requirements and stated that the recommended design criteria may not accommodate District needs (current and future) and did not provide for emergency storage. They also stated that District policy has been to provide larger r wet well volumes for their pumping facilities. District staff's recommendation is to provide a 12, 000 gallon wetwell volume. This will provide adequate volume for flow rates, operational criteria, emergency storage, and future growth. Pump Station Design. Three alternatives where discussed, a submersible system, a package pump station with pre-cast wetwell, and a custom sta- tion with dry-pit, wetwell configuration. The submersible station consisted of a pre-cast wetwell with a duplex submersible pumping system. This alternative offers the convenience of a com- pact station with low capital cost and a reduced 2 construction period. The draw back of this alter- native is the relatively high periodic maintenance requirements. The wet well capacity is somewhat limited by the availability and cost restraints of large diameter pre-cast units. The second alternative consisted of a "can-type" package plant with a pre-cast wetwell. This al- ternative offers readily accessible pump and motor assemblies and reduction in maintenance require- ments. Due to the limited access in the package plant, this system does not allow for ready replacement of pump and motor assemblies and has limited working space for normal maintenance prac- tices. The last alternative consists of a custom pump station with a wetwell/dry pit arrangement. This ,. alternative may be designed to every District requirement and standard and provides for the lowest maintenance and operation needs. The layout of the pump station is non-limiting in relation to work space, accessibility, safety, operations, and maintenance. The down side of this option is that it has the longest design and construction time as well as the highest capital cost of the three alternatives. After further discussion, the District staff recommended the design and construction of a cus- tom pump station. Discharge Locations. The District originally wanted to discharge waste to two locations, the digester or headworks, depending on material being .r dumped and operational conditions. This would also provide alternative disposal area should pumping to one location or the other is tem- porarily unavailable. District staff discussed the various operation and maintenance concerns regarding discharge to the digesters. The concerns include plugging of the long force main piping and clean out techniques. .., District staff preferred not to discharge waste to the digester and recommended discharge to the truck line only (headworks) . other features. Other design features discussed are as follows: Make-up water. Plant water will be used to flush the wetwell after a pumping cycle to reduce the potential for odors, corrosion to the tank and 3 equipment and to reduce the solids deposition within the forcemain piping. overflow. An overflow will be provided to eliminate the potential for spillage, overflow onto the plant site, and exposure to the public. Ventilation. Ventilation will be used to prevent build-up of gasses within the dry-pit and working area within the facility. Wetwell ventilation for odor control will be installed. This feature will not be included at this time, however, provisions must be made to accommodate a future connection. Dual forcemain. The nature of materials pump will .. will require maintenance procedures from time to time which dictate the removal of the forcemain from service. A second forcemain will be con- structed as a back-up for the periods when the primary forcemain is out of service. All five mains will be constructed in straight reaches and eliminating as many bends or turns as feasible. .�, Distribution Attendees John Linder/OCSD .e r 4 r � I •+ MEETING MINUTES r DATE: July 28, 1989 Job No. 256-01 MEETING DATE: July 27, 1989 r PROJECT: Waste Haulers mp Staii n (CSDOC JOB N . P1-27-2) r ATTENDEES: Tom Dawes%C DOC Jack Vincent CSDO Paul Mitchell OC r Jerry Wood/IWA Mark Esquer/IWA r' A meeting was held to discuss the project schedule, scope of work, and project status. The meeting was held at 4:00 p.m. at the District headquarters (Plant 1) . r IWA and District staff discussed the schedule and time required to complete the project work for the custom dry pit/wet well lift station. IWA estimated that the design could possibly be completed by the first week in November. This schedule would in- clude time for quality control, District reviews, and several team meetings. District staff stated that this schedule will not r meet their schedule and is not acceptable. The team then discussed the construction schedule, construction r target dates, and the schedule conflicts with other District con- struction work. We also discussed the possibility of providing an alternative dump site should the project see delays. District staff felt that an alternative "temporary" dump site would not be Ytl feasible. We reviewed the board meeting dates and the possibility of ac- celerating the project schedule to accommodate completion of plans and specifications the first week in September. The team agreed this might be acceptable for the District, however, Dis- trict staff would need to discuss the target dates with Mr. Dawes. we also discussed the possibility of pre-purchasing pump/motor assemblies and MCC's. IWA discussed the change in scope from a package plant or submer- sible system to a dry pit/wet well facility. The change would require additional man-hours to design the structural and r electrical portion of the proposed work. This in turn requires a change in design fees to accommodate the extra work. District staff stated the scope of work had not changed except for not Meeting Minutes July 28, 1989 Waste Haulers Pump Station Page 2 of 2 pumping waste flows to the digesters and eliminating the grinder. IWA explained that the RFP mentioned an estimated construction Cost of $140,000.00 dollars and the understanding was this would ,. buy a package plant or submersible pump/wet well system, not a $3,000,000 to $400,000.00 dollar pump station. The District staff asked Mr. Dawes to join the meeting and dis- cuss the previously mentioned topics. Mr. Dawes stated that pre-purchasing equipment as well as an increase of design fees is not possible due to Board requirements. He also agreed on the custom pump station with wet well/dry pit design. He asked staff and IWA to be creative, implementing concepts such as design/build specifications for the structural or control work. .. He finally stated that the project must be completed by the week of August 22. IWA agreed to the target dates and the direction of specifying a r - design/build structure and design. IWA will work very closely with District staff over the next three weeks. �+ A preliminary design meeting is set for Tuesday, August 1 to dis- cuss the project concept, station layout, and specific design details. r MAE:djm r Distribution: .+ Tom Dawes/CSDOC Jack Vincent/CSDOC Paul Mitchell/CSDOC Jerry Wood/IWA Mark Esquer/IWA r August 9, 1989 two new points of connection from the specified irrigation system to the existing city water supply piping. These connections were needed to optl Iz the irrigation system and were not shown on the contract plans. Also loci ed In this Item are the costs of additional irrigation piping and modiflcat ns to cover nearby areas not included in the project. Item 6 is additional landscaping to the area at the New Main Entrance to enhance and tempi ent the specified landscaping, at a cost of $17,596.73. The above-described changes are considered by staff to be ork that would ' have been included in the original design if discovered or know prior to its completion. NON Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 for n addition of $49,410.76 to the contract with Kiewit Pacific Co. There s no time extension associated with this change order. 9(j) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 4 TO MISCELLANEO MODIFICATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTSTO FACILITIES AT TREATMENT PLAN NU. 2, JOB NU. P2-T. This project includes 38 non-related it of rehabilitation and repair work at Plant No. 2. Major items of work incl a replacement of the domes on Digester 'A' and 88", built in the early 1950 s; replacement of two influent pumps at Headworks 'C'; the installation of eplacement barscreens at Headworks "Cn; replacement of grit augers; screenin conveyors; chlorine system piping and waste activated sludge pumps; new primar influent flaw meters; and waste NO, activated sludge bypass piping. Chang Order No. 4 provides for five changes to the work at Plant No. 2 and adds a ne of $21,904.00 to the contract. Item 1, in the amount of $2 ,476.00, provides for the excavatioh and removal of a slurry concrete pipe cradle on the 84-inch RCP at the new Primary Influent Meter Structure 'A". a cradle was not shown on the contract drawings and had to be removed to allow for construction of the new meter structure. Item 2, in the amount of $6, 7.00, provides for additional concrete saw cutting and concrete removals toJings. e it the installation of the new, larger bar screens. Item 3, in theamountof38.00, provides for the addition of reinforcing steel in the new polymer storetank base. The reinforcing steel was not included in NONthe original contract Item 4, in the amount of $1,930.00, provides for the construction f three new concrete pipe supports in Digester 'B". The new supports were c structed to replace those that were unavoidably removed under Change Order o. 1, Item 9. Item 5, a credit in the amount of $11.607.00, provides for the eletion of the 'F' and "G" Basin scum box improvements. The ab e-described changes are considered by staff to be improvements to the design. None of the Items are for replaced work. S ff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 for a net addition of $21,904 00 to the contract with Ziebarth and Alper. There is no time extension assoc ted with this change order. 9(k) : APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSTRUMENTATION IMPROVEMENTS AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB N0. P2-4 REBID • FUEL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT N0. 1, JOB N0. R-033-1 REBID FUEL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT N0. 2 JOB N0. R-03 -2 REB WA ID : STEHAU�LEc AMPLING Y EM AT PLAN N0. 1 JOB N, P3-27-1; AND WASTEHAULER PUMP 5TA11UN AT PLANT NU. 1. P1 2. To reduce construction management effort and achieve economies of scale, several relatively minor jobs are planned for construction as one project. -7- August 9, 1989 Instrumentation Improvements at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-40 (Rebid) , connects forty-six signals to the Plant 2 computer to complete work required by the State of California (under the grant program for the Secondary ,r Facilities). Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. R-033-1(Rebid) and Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. R-033-2(Rebid) comprise the third and final phase of work necessary to comply with regulations governing fuel storage tanks. Five underground storage tanks will receive new fittings and piping modifications and an electronic level sensing system compatible with the existing computerized fuel inventory monitoring system. Day tanks will be modified for corrosion resistance and operating flexibility for standby electric .d generators. These three jobs were originally bid in April but the low bidder made an error in his bid and was released by the Boards and all bids were rejected and authorized for rebid. The Wastehauler Sampling System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27-1, provides automatic sampling, logging, security, and reports for wastes that are trucked to the plant by wastehaulers. It will be installed at the new wastehauler dump station now being constructed under Job No. P1-27, Entrances, Site, Security, and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. 1. This system will monitor dumping to help prevent illegal disposal of hazardous wastes, improve processing of data and billings and allow safer and more accurate sampling. Also included in this job are underground piping for the two dump ports and area drainage and paving. r, The Wastehauler Pump Station at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27-2, provides facilities for either pumping.waste from the dump site directly to Plant 1 digesters, or to the Plant 2 diversion sewer. This considerably improves our operational flexibility for handling these types of wastes. A small pump f station and storage tank are required. Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications and ,., authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Job Nos. P2-40(Rebid), R-033-1(Rebid), R-033-2(Rebid) , P1-27-1 and P1-27-2. A tentative bid date of September 19, 1989 is scheduled. The Engineer's estimate for this work is $2,000,000. 9(1): APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DESIGN AGREEMENT: AND APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REHABI I ION OF DIGESTERS 9 AND 10 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 JO O. P1-35-2, AND REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS K. M N AND AlEATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-39. In April 1988, the Directors approved a fessionaI services agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers prepare plans and specifications for rehabilitation of the final two digest s at Plant No. 1 and seven digesters `y at Plant No. 2. This project modifies improves the digesters to provide high-rate sludge mixing, internal ga ontainment, and insulation of existing domes. Existing pumps and piping ich are no longer necessary will be removed d and safety relief equipment wil a added to protect digester domes from overpressure. Minor structur modifications will improve integrity of the digesters. Overall , this k will maximize digester efficiency, produce more low pressure gas which w use as an energy source, and provide better control of odor-producing emissioaf. These projects were designed concurrently to provide uniformity of desig nd operation between Plants 1 and 2. .` .. -8- RESOLUTION NO. 89-153 .+ AWARDING SPECIFICATION NOS. R-033-1 REBID AN R- BI NO. E JUbN S. PI-Z7-1 AND P1-�7- r A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR r FUEL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, SPECIFICATION NO. R-033-1 (REBID) ; FUEL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2, SPECIFICATION NO. R-033-2 (REBID) ; INSTRUMENTATION ,r IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-40 (REBID) ; WASTEHAULER SAMPLING SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-27-1; AND WASTEHAULER PUMP STATION AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-27-2 r r The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, r DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. In accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the r California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Boards of ,r Directors, on August 9, 1989, authorized filing a Notice of Exemption 1n connection with the proposed projects for Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-033-1 (Rebid) ; Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 2, Specification No. R-033-2 (Rebid); Instrumentation Improvements at Plant r No. 2, Job No. P2-40 (Rebid); Wastehauler Sampling System at Plant No. 1, Job r No. P1-27-1; and Wastehauler Pump Station at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27-2; and, r Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of r contract be made to Schuler Engineering Corporation for Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-033-1 (Rebid) ; Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 2, Specification Nb. R-033-2 (Rebid); Instrumentation Improvements at r Plant No. 2, Jab No. P2-40 (Rebid) ; Wastehauler Sampling System at Plant No. 1, .r Job No. P1-27-1; and Wastehauler Pump Station at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27-2, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, r Section 3. That the contract for Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 1, Specification No. R-033-1 (Rebid) ; Fuel System Improvements at Plant No. 2, r Specification No. R-033-2 (Rebid) ; Instrumentation Improvements at Plant No. 2, .d Job No. P2-40 (Rebid) ; Wastehauler Sampling System at Plant No. 1, Jab No. P1-27-1; and Wastehauler Pump Station at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27-2, be r awarded to Schuler Engineering Corporation in the total amount of $1,622,447.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, r in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 8, 1989. r r r r STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) r r I , RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, r California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 69-153 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Boards on the 8th day of November, 1989, by the following vote, to wit: r AYES: Edward L. Allen, Margaret M. Arnold, Roland E. Bigonger, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, John C. Cox, Jr., Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Dan R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Robert Hanson, Evelyn Hart, Ronald B. Hoesterey, Ron Isles, Ursula E. Kennedy, William D. Mahoney, Tom Mays, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Bob Perry, Iry Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard T. Polls, Don R. Roth, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Don E. Smith, Roger R. Stanton, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Henry W. Wedaa, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell r NOES: None ABSENT: Wes Bannister, Sally Anne Sheridan, Wayne Silzel r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 1 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, this 8th day r of November, 1989. r Rita J. Brown, Secretary Boards of Directors, County ,r Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California r r December 13, 1989 First, additional testing was deemed necessary on c in VOC data collected as part of SCAQMD's required sampling. SCAQMD reed to issue the permit with the understanding that the work would be 4one at a later date. This shortened the time frame for obtaining the PTC. T additional test work has been accomplished and, in fact, diff<rIsk ncen ations of the constituents were found as well as the discovery s not previously found. Because of this, Pirnie must rerun the healtsessment with the new concentrations and constituents. Itexpected that the data will cause significant changes to the health risment; however, this work must be done to the satisfaction of the SC Second, there have b mid- equests from SCAQMD and changing project requirements, inc ing chanand exposure criteria, and changes in T-BACT (Best Avails Control Te for Toxics). This will continue to require additio snal port from Pirnie. Accordingly, staff believes that it is advisable to incr se the budget to accomplish the work on as-needed basis. Sta is recommending that the Directors authorize the issuance of Change 9,pder No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 38881, increasing the authorized maxiamount by $57,000.00, from $95,000.00 to $152,000.00. 10(1 ): AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PURCHASE ORDER NO. 40113 TO IWA ENGINEERS RE JOB NO. P1-27-2. , In November the Directors awarded Wastehauler Pump Station at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-27-2, as part of four other projects with similar work items. The Wastehauler Pump Station includes facilities for pumping trucked-in waste from a dump site constructed at the easterly plant boundary to the plant diversion sewer. IWA Engineers prepared the original design for the project under staff purchase order authority for the amount of $24,700.00. e. Originally, it was planned that all of the construction management activities associated with this project would be administered by our staff. However, the project is significantly larger and more complex than originally envisioned. Therefore, staff is requesting authority for IWA Engineers to assist our construction management staff in the review of shop drawings, which Includes review and approval of the contractor's structural calculations. The estimated cost for the shop drawing review, on an hourly-rate basis, is an amount not to exceed $14,000. The recommended action is to authorize the General Manager to issue Change Order No. 1, increasing Purchase Order No. 40113 from $24,700.00 to $38,700.00. Staff recommends approval . 10(m): AUTHORIZE ISSUANCE OF PURCHASE ORDERS FOR ISSION SAMPLING, ANALYSES AND MODELING REQUIRED FOR SCAW PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT FOR JOBS —' NOS. P173 AND P2-42. The Directors have previ y retained John Carollo Engineers to provide design services for the ex an and improvements of secondary treatment facilities at both pla , Jobs No. P1-36 and P2-42. One component of the secondary expansi ncludes the work necessary to obtain a Permit to Construct p. (PTC) from th outh Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). As part of -8- .e COO= SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE C0LD= Page 1 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 EIT.TS AVENUE ECUNTAIN VALLEY, CAIUMUTA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (11 CONTRACTOR: Schuler Engineering Corporation DATE November 14. 1990 ,o JOB: FUEL SYSTEM IMP%NEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, SPECIFICATION NO. R-033-1 (REBID) : FUEL SYSTEM IMMEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2, SPECIFICATION No. R-033-2 (REBID) : I STRUMFNTATION II AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-40 (REBID) ; NASTEHAULER SAWLING SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-27-1: AND, WZASTEHAUIER PLDT STATION AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-27-2. Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Baduet) $ 23,954.00 In acroxda with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract ® and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as ccupensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. P1-27-2 .. Item 1 - STRUC URAL-CHMS S FOR PLW STATION DUE TO CHANCES IN SOM CONDITIONS During excavation for the pump station, the Contractor encountered poor soil conditions. The design of the structure, a part of the contract required thicker invert and walls than shown in the contract do=rents. This change provided for additional concrete and reinforcing steel over and above that shown on the original contract plans. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account `tl pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 23,954.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 45 Calendar Days s, TO'II+L ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER: $ 23,954.00 'AJM TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER: 45 Calendar Days The additional, work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 45 days' extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted .„ and approved by this Change Order. "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" 0OU= SANT19 CN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COMM Page 2 of 2 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 EL,T.Tc AVENUE FOf MUN VALLEY, CAIMMEUA 92708 - CHANGE CRDER C. 0. NO. One (11 r CONTRALIOR:_ Schuler Engineeriny Corporation DATE NMeuber 14. 1990 JOB: FUEL SYSTEM IId'ROVEt MIM AT PLANT NO. 1, SPECIFICATION NO. R-033-1 (REBID): ,r FUEL SYSTEM IIAPROVENIaM AT FLAN( NO. 2, SPECIFICATION NO. R-033-2 (REBID] : INSTRUM=Od II+@FmVEM[YTTS AT PTPITf NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-40 (REBID) : FP.SPEHAMER SAMPLING SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-27-1: AND, WASTEIIAULER PUMP SI7iTION AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-27-2. SMID %M OF CONTRACT TINE Original Contract Date Novenber 29, 1989 Original Contract Tice 240 Calendar Days Original Ccupletion Date July 26, 1990 ,r Tilm Extension this C.O. 45 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 45 Calendar Days Revisal Contract Time 285 Calendar Days Revised Final Ccupletion Due Date Septerber 9, 1990 Tine Subject to Liqui eted Damages Not Applicable _ Actual Final Carpletion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 1,622,447.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) ( ) $ 23,954.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1,646,401.00 Board Authorization Date: Noverber 14, 1990 CNINTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF QUA = CXn=,. CALIFORNIA r BY: I MENDED r Engin Date emstruction Manager Date APPROM AS TO FORM: Director of Engineering Date General Counsel . Date ctmrvaa ENGniEER CORPOIWIICN xxt r BY: ConvS r Date .d "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( f) ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" V April 14, 1993 of the system expansion at Plant No. 1, it was proposed to use the same pe of air diffusers that are currently utilized in the Plant No. 1 secondary tre ment facility. The existing system, which has worked very well, uses a r nd membrane tube, or "sock" design to diffuse the air. m. Because the air diffusion is so critical to effectiv ess and efficiency of the secondary treatment process, the Operations and E ineering staffs are ,N recommending that the consultant investigate, test a ew flat plate design to determine if an alternative to the existing system uld result in substantial savings in future energy costs and more effective treat nt removal rates. (This is not an issue at Plant No. 2 because that plant uses re oxygen in its secondary treatment system rather than air.) -" The proposed new work wo d include a detailed study of the performance of the new plate desi at other facilities, and a report on the economics related to power sav' gs that could be expected. Since there are no two treatment plants with ide ical sewage characteristics or operating modes, a - . pilot study is also advisabl The engineer would also provide support for a pilot project to test the plate ffusers. If the tests determine that a new device is appropriate, it would designed into the existing basins when the final P7-36 project is let for bi mg, in about one year. .a Ste s therefore recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized negotiate Addendum No. 2 with John Carollo Engineers to change the scope of ork to provide the additional engineering services for the design of Secon ry Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-36, and Secondary Tre ent Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, to include the above described rk. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed addendum ill be presented to the Boards for consideration. 9(f): AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND NEGOTIATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CHEMICAL AND WASTEHAULER FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT N0. 1 . JOB NO. P1_46.r AND CHEMICAL AND PLANT WATER FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO, 2. JOB NO, P2-55. This project is a continuation of a series of projects to modify or upgrade existing facilities to eliminate hazards, improve reliability and efficiency and accommodate future master-planned construction. This project will provide -9- April 14, 1993 alternate chemicals to replace gaseous chlorine applications now used in the treatment plants; modifications to our wastehauler receiving facilities to correct .d deficiencies and improve operational flexibility and reliability; and improvements to - our plant water facilities and digester gas compressors. Elimination of Gaseous Chlorine. Chlorine is a very hazardous substance that is widely used at the Districts' facilities and treatment plants worldwide for odor control and disinfection. Recently published standards revisions contain requirements which may restrict its use but still not eliminate the potential of a - - calamity from a major leak. The Districts have tested alternative chemicals and are currently using bleach as a substitute in some foul air scrubbers and are testing hydrogen peroxide for odor control in the plant influent. The proposed project will investigate using alternative chemicals for all chlorine applications in the treatment plants. Wastehauler Facility Modifications. At Plant No. 1, we have a dump facility that accepts pumped wastes from septic systems as well as certain high- solids industrial waste that are trucked to the plant by wastehaulers. It is the only -- one of its kind in the area. Although our wastehauler dump facility is relatively ,n new, it has experienced continual problems because of clogging of the system which results in high maintenance. When the system was designed the si mg 'ficant amount of debris that is often in the trucked wastes was unknown. The project .d consultant will investigate innovative dump methods and alternatives, contents of waste, and recommend modifications to allow us to more readily accommodate the waste on a continuing basis. A secondary system for placing certain high-strength r waste directly into the sludge digesters will also be considered to determine if it would be more efficient. Improvements to control odors and security will also be modified as necessary. ' Plant Water Supply. At Plant No. 2, current plant water (secondary treated wastewater) used for operational requirements averages 7.5 million gallons per day (mgd), with a range reported in December 1992 of 5.58 mgd to 9.09 mgd. This water has many uses, including cooling, heating and washing. The plant water source is currently secondary effluent from Plant No. 1. Recently, the Plant No. 1 effluent was routed to the 84-inch interplant line from an old 42-inch line and the 42-inch line has been demolished to make way for the new interplant utility construction project, Job No. 1-9, now nearly complete. With the diversion of the secondary effluent to the 84-inch interplant line and combination of this flow with primary effluent, a decrease in plant water quality has been observed at Plant No. 2 which has impacted the operational and maintenance reliability of systems using the plant water. -10- w July 14, 1993 the general contractor's cost mark-up on this work and to insure tig ontrol over the contractor performing this work. This work will be accomplis d at a later date under a separate contract. The design is now complete and staff recomm ds approval of plans and specifications and authorization for the General Man er to establish the bid date for Job No. P2-53-1. The bid date is tentatively s for September 7, 1993. The engineer's estimate for this work is $2,600,00 . 11(f): ACCEPTANCE F TIF NER P M PRIMARY CLARIFIERS NOS -1 EFFLUENT LAUNDERS. JOB WO. P1- -1 S COMPLETE. This project adds stain ss steel stiffeners to the effluent launders on Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6.15 a lant No. 1. When operated at certain flows, a wav/developed developed in a launders which impacted the treatment effe By stiffe ng the launders, this wave motion is dampened and the clarite mor effectively and efficiently. This contract is now complete. . Mechanical has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specwithout any change orders. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of ton attached with the agenda material, authorizing acceptance of the worlete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notipletion as required. The final project cost is $39,572.00. 11(g): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND AWARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CHEMICAL AND `d WASTEHAULER FACILITY MODIFICATIONS, JOB NO, P11-46. AND CHEMICAL AND PLANT WATER FACILITY MODIFICATIONS, JOB NO. P2-55. r - This project is a continuation of a series of projects to modify or upgrade existing facilities to eliminate hazards, improve reliability and efficiency and accommodate future master-planned construction. This project will provide alternate chemicals to replace gaseous chlorine applications now used in the treatment plants; modifications to our wastehauler receiving facilities to correct deficiencies and improve operational flexibility and reliability; and improvements to our plant water facilities and digester gas compressors. m _ Elimination of Gaseous Chlorine. Chlorine is a very hazardous substance that is widely used at the Districts' facilities and treatment plants worldwide for odor control and disinfection. Recently published standards revisions contain requirements which may restrict its use but still not eliminate the potential of a calamity from a major leak. The Districts have tested alternative chemicals and are 7 .r July 14, 1993 currently using bleach as a substitute in some foul air scrubbers and are testing hydrogen peroxide for odor control in the plant influent. The proposed project will investigate using alternative chemicals for all chlorine applications in the treatment plants. Wastehauler Facility Modifications. At Plant No. 1, we have a dump facility that accepts pumped wastes from septic systems as well as certain high- solids industrial waste that are trucked to the plant by wastehaulers. It is the only ,z one of its kind in the area. Although our wastehauler dump facility is relatively new, it has experienced continual problems because of clogging of the system which results in high maintenance. When the system was designed the significant amount of debris that is often in the trucked wastes was unknown. The project _ consultant will investigate innovative dump methods and alternatives, contents of waste, and recommend modifications to allow us to more readily accommodate the .. waste on a continuing basis. A secondary system for placing certain high-strength waste directly into the sludge digesters will also be considered to determine if it would be more efficient. Improvements to control odors and security will also be modified as necessary. Plant Water Supply. At Plant No. 2, current plant water (secondary treated wastewater) used for operational requirements averages 7.5 million gallons per day (mgd), with a range reported in December 1992 of 5.58 mgd to 9.09 mgd. This water has many uses, including cooling, heating and washing. The plant water source is currently secondary effluent from Plant No. 1. Recently, the Plant No. 1 effluent was routed to the 84-inch interplant line from an old 42-inch line and the 42-inch line has been demolished to make way for the new interplant utility construction project, Job No. 1-9, now nearly complete. With the diversion of the secondary effluent to the 84-inch interplant line and combination of this flow with primary effluent, a decrease in plant water quality has been observed at Plant No. 2 which has impacted the operational and maintenance reliability of systems using the plant water. It is therefore proposed to evaluate and recommend alternatives to provide secondary effluent from the Plant No. 2 secondary facility. Items for consideration will include gravity and pump facilities, filtration, constructability and costs. The evaluation will also address the effects of a new filtration system to be installed at the existing plant water station (Job No. P2-43-1) on the quality of the plant water. Digester Gas Compressors. An evaluation of the plant water used for ® cooling digester gas compressors is proposed to determine the feasibility of providing an improved cooling system to extend the service life of the compressors. The plant water now used for cooling, partly because of the water quality problem .. -8- d July 14, 1993 discussed above, may not be the best cooling source. Alternatives include a closed loop cooling system for the digester gas compressors with filtration and chemical treatment. The evaluation will address water quality and flow requirements and determine the best water source for the cooling system. In April, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a professional services agreement for the above work. Proposals were requested from four firms and proposals were received from all of them. The Selection Committee has negotiated a professional services agreement with Black & Veatch to conduct the evaluations, prepare plans and specifications, and provide construction support services, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, and fixed profit, for an amount not to exceed $379,715.00. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with Black & Veatch. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. 11 (h): AUTHORIZING SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND ,., NEGOTIATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR MODIFICATIONS TO ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, AND PROCESS EVALUATIONS AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2. JOBS NOS, P1-40-1 AND P2-47-1. Through the routine and ongoing activities of design, construction, operations and maintenance staff, small projects are continually identified which require engineering evaluation and project design and construction. These projects, which require more time than available from Districts' staff to evaluate and design in-house, are assembled into a larger project for ease of project management when -- using outside services. A number of these small projects have been assembled for the subject projects, Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems, and Process Evaluations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Jobs Nos. P1-40-1 and P2-47-1 . There are three areas of work to be completed under this proposed project. 1. Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems, and Process Evaluations at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-1, including design assistance on Job No. P1-47, 12 KV Distribution System for Support Facilities, a staff initiated project. 9 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA September 7, 1993 In—EL4s AVENUE PAP PO I OM6127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 921284127 01.1962.2111 MEMORANDUM r TO: Dennis May .N SUBJECT: Temporary and Permanent Wastehauler Facility Job No. P7-46 PAP .. I want to give my thoughts on some of the issues that you and I, Wendy Sevenandt and Manny Stoffer discussed. 9� First of all, I think the idea of a temporary gravity drain is workable and recommend _ that B&V proceed, with the following conditions: I" 1. The manhole on the Interplant Diversion should be constructed with a PVC liner in a sufficient size. It should probably have some drops inside the manhole to direct the effluent into the water rather than just falling. A special manhole may need to be designed. It's probably a $40,000 manhole. While this work takes place, traffic can be redirected to the east-bound lane. r 2. Raise the dump pad. We can bring fill in from the back of the plant and place it directly on the asphalt. Temporary dump facilities should be made large enough for two trucks to dump; others will have to wait. The pad will have to be quite large to hold the two trucks, and r I'm thinking they could be side by side. If it's not possible to construct such a large pad, then one truck dumping will be sufficient, with the others waiting. Be sure that drainage is allowed to pass in AA the existing curves. 3. Drain pipes should be designed so that they can be closed and PAP pressurized with plant water for flushing. That is to say, the dump port will probably have to have a lid that can withstand 75 or 100 psi and some port constructed where we can blast plant water through ti. the line to clear it. d r d Dennis May September 7, 1993 Page Two 4. 1 think your idea of doing something similar for the permanent facility has merit. I'd rather raise it up and get a free fall than build another pump station. I want to go over the permanent one carefully with Maintenance, Source Control and Operations, but I think this is a good _ idea. Once we raise it up, we will have more potential for odor problems; therefore, a building or walls will have to be constructed to that we can evacuate foul air. Substantial landscaping improvements will also be required. •+ 5. Because of the possibility that this will work, ultimate pipes should be placed within the street, rather than temporary. For the ultimate, the size should probably be at least 12 inches, and I'd like to try for a slope of not less than 5%. Permanent plant water cleaning facilities could be installed. Some sort of screening would be necessary to prevent large solids from entering the Interplant line. Please note that we do have a long-term strategy problem. If we're going to expand this treatment plant to provide large amounts of secondary water for " reclamation, we won't be able to divert water to Plant 2 like we have in the past. -- However, since that's many years away, I think we can proceed in the interim. Because of the size of this project, I think we should quickly finalize our design '+ plans and bid this work as quickly as possible. Therefore, please prepare an agenda item for the October Board which will allow the General Manager to award the contract in an amount not to exceed $200,000. That will take one Board action. We would meet early next week to go over this idea with Bob Ooten, Ed Hodges and Margie Nellor. Black and Veatch ;hquld attend. r Thoommaaasss M. Dawes Director of Engineering TMD:jt wp0 %"Xp1-49\090793.m1 cc: Bob Ooten Ed Hodges Margie Nellor Jack Vincent Paul Mitchell BLACK & VEATCH MMI TECFINICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1.1 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County B&V Project 24349.320 Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications B&V File E.1 at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-46 September 28, 1993 WAM31AULER FACILITY DEFICIENCY REPORT PURPOSE The purpose of this Technical Memorandum is to provide a detailed description of perceived deficiencies at the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) ® Plant No. 1 Wastehauler Facility. This list of deficiencies was generated based on - information from the following sources: .0 1. Wastehauler Modifications project meeting, July 28, 1993. 2. Planning Workshop for Wastehauler Modifications, August 10, 1993. 3. Inspection of the Wastehauler Facility, August 10, 1993. W 4. Inspection of the Wastehauler Facility, photographic record of the site and facilities, inspection of dismantled piping and equipment, August 25, 1993. 5. Inspection of the temporary dumping site; observation of waste haulers discharging at the temporary facility; informal interview of wastehaulers, September 10, 1993. 6. Survey of other comparable plants with similar hauled waste facilities. 7. Survey of waste haulers that are permitted by CSDOC and frequently use the facilities at Plant No. 1. S. Other reports and documents prepared by Black & Veatch for similar projects. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Wastehauler Facility's deficiencies can be attributed to a variety of operational problems and equipment damage. This report provides a detailed listing of the v NJ19.R0/ILLl TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1.1 Page 2 'County Sanitation Districts of Orange County B&V Project 24349.320 Wastehauler Facility Deficiency Report September 29, 1993 perceived deficiencies at the facility. Alternative improvements and other measures to correct these deficiencies will be addressed in a separate technical memorandum. The evaluation presented in this report has not identified any one single critical deficiency. The operational problems that have been experienced at the Waste ter Facility appear to be caused by multiple shortcomings. .d It should be noted that an actual operational failure has not been witnessed by Black _ & Veatch engineers. For this reason, Black & Veatch recommends that the facility be operated manually to accumulate additional operating data before a decision is made to replace the pumps. If it is possible to start the pumps, limited operation of the facility may provide additional insight to the deficiencies that will require renovation for long-term use of the facility. BACKGROUND Constructed in 1991, the Wastehauler Facility is located near the main entrance at Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley, and has two discharge bays at a drive-through station and operator's booth. Each bay has a 4-inch port that discharges into a common 20,000-gallon wetwell and pumping station. The pumping station was designed to transfer sepmge, grease, and other liquid wastes to the 78-inch interplant pipeline. The interplant pipeline conveys these wastes and other waste streams to CSDOC's Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. High maintenance demands and equipment failures due to clogging and flood damage have resulted in CSDOC taking the facility out of service until these problems could be corrected. Since 1992, this relatively new facility has only been in full operation _ for approximately four days. During this time, a temporary, or secondary, dump site located near the northwest corner of the Metering and Diversion Structure has been in operation and is ade- quately meeting CSDOC's waste disposal needs. This site consists of two dump ports discharging by gravity directly to the interplant pipeline. Upcoming construction at Plant No. 1, however, will soon eliminate access to this secondary dump site. The purpose of this project, Job No. P146, is to provide a permanent operational dump site. Modifications to the Wastehauler Facility are needed to provide a reliable, fully operational facility and to reduce maintenance requirements. A two- phased approach is being implemented to maintain the stringent project schedule. Phase 1 will consist of installation of new interim dumping facilities for use on a u NN9.x30/IM1I TECPMCAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1.1 Page 3 .. ' County Sanitation Districts of Orange County B&V Project 24349.320 Wastehauler Facility Deficiency Report September 29, 1993 short-term basis. Phase 2 will consist of modifications to the existing Wastehauler d Facility for long-term use. Improvements to correct the majority of deficiencies identified at the Wastehauler d Facility will be included in the Phase 2 modifications project Therefore, the problem areas need to be identified in order to develop the scope of recommended improvements. This Technical Memorandum addresses the deficiencies in the existing Wastehauler Facility. LIST OF DEFICIENCIES The existing facilities were inspected and examined in order to identify deficiencies that could be corrected to make the facility operational. The deficiencies described herein will be used to develop alternatives for long term improvements that would restore the existing facility and provide enhancements to improve operation and reduce maintenance. In general, two categories of deficiencies were identified: (1) shortcomings in the design and construction of the facility, and (2) damage caused by flooding. The list of specific deficiencies follows: Deficiency No. I - Duck Bay Alignment • The outside truck bay is not aligned correctly. The easterly dump port is approximately five feet from the operator booth canopy wall, which does not allow the tankers to easily maneuver through the facility and properly align the trucks with the port The centerline of the dump port should have a minimum clearance from the wall of sht feet • The present arrangement of the truck bays and operator booth does not allow an unobstructed view of the haulers activities. The wall separating the two bays obstructs the view of the easterly dump port from the operator's area, and the window in the wall is too small for the operator in the booth to sufficiently observe the hauler's activities. When an operator is not present in the Waste- hauler Facility operators booth, the guard at the Plant No. I front entrance should be able to monitor the trucks at the facility. From the Ellis Avenue Q, entrance, the guard has an inadequate, obstructed view of all dumping activities. _ i1M9.tN/1�1 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1.1 Page 4 'County Sanitation Districts of Orange County B&V Project 24349.320 Wastehauler Facility Deficiency Report September 29, 1993 Deficiency No. 2 -Housekeepmg/Odor Control Measurer at the Discharge Point • A 1/2-inch hose is currently provided for washdown of the trucks and any spillage. A hose with a minimum diameter of 1-inch should be provided so that N washdown is less time consuming. • Presently, the dump ports protrude from a small concrete depression and are 'a protected by concrete truck blocks. The concrete driveway immediately sur- rounding the ports has an approximate slope of 2 percent toward the depres- sions. Increasing the slope of the driveway toward the dump ports would reduce the time required to dump, and provide greater spill containment. • Odor control provisions are not provided at the discharge point. Odors are m generated from spillage, which cannot be completely eliminated from any delivery of waste. Odor control is not provided during washdown. The washdown period of most deliveries is susceptible to splashing and spillage, and washwater flow is allowed m. to drain freely to the 2-inch drain line at the bottom of the catch basin. This activity has a great potential for releasing odors. w Deiciency No. 3 - Sampling • Grab samples taken at random are presently used to monitor the quality of the _ waste stream. However, there is no testing procedure or device, such as a pH meter, to monitor each individual truck as it unloads to ensure that "bad loads" are not being discharged into the plant. Although prohibited by permit, - strongly acidic waste loads have been dumped at the facility. Sample lines are located downstream of each discharge point on the influent lines to the wetwell. The sampling lines have had plugging problems and the automatic samplers have been taken out of service. Deftciency No. 4-PreltwoneWIScreeutitg Facilities • The station does not have facilities to screen the waste before it enters the wetwell or pump station. Large debris, including rocks, rags, and plastic bags, are allowed to pass directly into the wetwell and pumps along with the liquid s 2U19.JN/lal TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1.1 Page 5 .. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County E&V Project 24349.320 Wastehauler Facility Deficiency Report September 29, 1993 waste stream. If this is arrangement is maintained, this debris will continue to be a source of pipe plugging and excessive wear on the pumps. • The facility has no provisions for pretreatment of the waste stream, such as p chemical or biochemical addition. Any 'bad loads" that are brought into the station cannot be pretreated (i.e. pH adjustment) before entering the interplant pipeline. Doldorry No. 5 - Discharge Pipelines to the WetweII w • The discharge pipelines from the dump ports in the truck bays to the wetwell are 8-inch diameter ductile iron pipe gravity sewers. They do not have flushing capabilities if the sewers become clogged with debris, or if grease builds up. D4k*ncy No. 6 - WetweII • Review of the NFFA 820 criteria (National Fire Protection Association's Recommended Practice forFire Protection in Wastewater7}earment Plants(1990), and Recommended Practice for Fire Protection in Wastewater 7}eatmenr and ,y Collection Facilities (1992)) revealed that the wetwell ventilation system is not in compliance with these requirements. The ventilation and monitoring procedures must be upgraded for future operation of the facility. This issue ,m will be addressed in more detail in Technical Memorandum 1.2. • The wetwell is not flood-proof. The exact cause of last winter's flooding is unknown. The wetwell overflow drains to the Sunflower Trunk Interceptor. One possibility is the incoming Sunflower Interceptor surcharged, backing up through the 12-inch overflow line, and into the Wastehauler Facility wetwell, w causing it to flood. • The wetwell is 22-feet in depth. The steps that are currently in the wetwell do not comply with Title 8 safety requirements. Any facility over 20-feet in depth requires personnel to use a ladder with a cage for access into the area. • Odor control is not provided in the wetwell. It is not an air-tight structure and can emit odorous gases. Provisions have been made for the future installation d of ventilation and/or odor control ductwork, via an 8-inch fiberglass reinforced pipe in the upper northwest corner of the pump station. The pipe is currently capped with a blind flange, and the modifications have not yet been made. s 3W9.r20/IRI TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1.1 Page 6 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County B&V Project 24349.320 Wastehauler Facility Deficiency Report September 29, 1993 Deficiency No. 7- Pump Suction Piping • The 10-inch x 4-inch eccentric reducers into the pumps were installed upside- down with the crown at the top and the invert flush with the invert of the 10- inch suction. Air binding of the pumps does not appear to be a problem, however, in spite of this. .• During the August 25, 1993, inspection, the eccentric reducer was removed from the suction piping. Inspection of the interior of the suction piping revealed approximately 4 inches of grit, sand, and grease that had settled in the e 10-inch pipeline. The other two suction lines should be dismantled and this material should be removed from the pipelines if the pumps are placed in service again. • The suction piping does not have flushing capabilities to remove debris and grease that may be clogging the lines. The piping must be dismantled for cleaning. a 1 Deftciency No. 8 - PWnp The facility has seen limited service, but during that time the pumps have experienced severe plugging problems. The main source of plugging appears to be rocks, rags, and plastics. The pumps are equipped with cutters, but these ti have not functioned well. The pumps are not equipped with any other mechanisms to protect them from clogging with rocks, rags, plastics, and other debris. • During the August 25, 1993, inspection, a section of 4-inch diameter discharge piping immediately downstream of the pump and the pump clean-out was •. removed for inspection of the pump impellers. At that time, there was no visible debris in the volute, with the exception of a rock that was revealed by a photograph. Water was run through the impellers from the discharge, and only a small amount of sand and grit was flushed out. However, operators _. have reported that debris has been pulled from the impellers during mainte- nance when the facility was in operation; rocks, rags, and plastics are some of the items removed from the impellers. The pump throat is 4-inches in diameter, and may need to be enlarged to prevent these materials from .• plugging the inlet. d N319.1A/1111 s TE=CAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1.1 Page 7 a 'County Sanitation Districts of Orange County B&V Project 24349.320 Wastehauler Facility Deficiency Report September 29, 1993 Dokienry No. 9 - Pnmp Discharge Piping b • The discharge piping from each pump has been constructed with short radius elbows. Given the type of materials passing through these pipelines, long radius elbows are desirable to help prevent clogging at these points in the - piping- • During the August 25, 1993, inspection, dismantling of the 4-inch diameter discharge piping mentioned above revealed a paper bag lodged in the W vertical elbow on the pump discharge piping. Some grit and sand was also present. Defuiency No. 10-Discharge HeaderlForce Main The August 25, 1993 inspection revealed a leak in the flinch diameter dis- charge header from a flange on the middle pump discharge wye. Pigging facilities were not provided for the discharge header, but would be a desirable improvement. Grease build-up and grit accumulation is a major concern for this piping. • The force main is not equipped with flushing water. Grease, grit, rocks, rags, and other debris could accumulate and plug this pipeline. Defrciawy No. 11 -Dry Pit Flooding e. The dry pit is not watertight and flooded during recent rains. The exact cause of last winter's flooding is unknown. Because one source cannot be pinpointed as the cause of flooding, and several may have actually contributed to the damage, all areas should be considered deficient and dealt with accordingly in the evaluation of long-term improvements. Possible flooding sources include: 1. leaky Electrical Junction Boxes - During the August 25, 1993 inspection, the electrical and communications access holes were opened and inspected. Standing water was present in both access holes. 2. Broken Electrical Ducts- Plant personnel discovered water in the bubbler panels and other electrical equipment after rains, and concluded that the water entered the boxes through the electrical ducts. y MN9.IIOMl1 m TECI-MCAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1.1 Page 8 .. 'County Sanitation Districts of Orange County B&V Project 24349.320 Wastebauler Facility Deficiency Report September 29, 1993 b 3. Hatches Not Watertight-It is possible that hatches and maintenance holes into the dry pit are not watertight, and water leaked in through breached seals. 4. High Groundwater Level- Groundwater may have infiltrated wan sleeves for pipes or ducting that are not watertight. 5. Electrical Power Failure-Power may have been interrupted to the station causing the wetwell overflow alarm to fail, as well as the submersible m pump in the sump. 6. Single Sump Pump - The capacity of the single submersible sump pump may have been exceeded by the incoming floodwater, or the single unit may have simply failed. Typically, duplex units are provided for standby capacity. Another theory is that the sump pump, which discharges to the wetwell, reached its shutoff head when the wetwell was flooded. Deficiency No. 12 -Elecirwalllnsnumentation Cormsian • Most of the electrical and instrumentation equipment in the dry pit was damaged by flooding. The two inspections of the site revealed extensive corrosion on many items, including the bubbler panels, hydrogen sulfide sensors, pump moisture detectors, and flow metering equipment. v • Inspections showed water was present in many of the gages on the pumps and in the panels. m Doldency No. 13 - Card Key Reader • The card key reader at the Operations Booth has not functioned reliably since facility start-up. Preliminary discussions with CSDOC staff revealed that repeated passes of a wastehauler's access card are sometimes required to open the gate, and that this can incorrectly result in multiple listings for a single dump. Furthermore, CSDOC's Source Control Division has requested that a means of integrating information from the card reader into their data management system be addressed. m r � t{N9.SN/Iln TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 1.1 Page 9 'County Sanitation Districts of Orange County B&V Project 24349.320 Wastehauler Facility Deficiency Report September 29, 1993 Defc&ncy No. 14 - Stmtdby Power v • Currently, the facility does not have an alternate power source. If the main power to the facility is interrupted critical systems, such as alarms and ventilation, will not function. a v a ti v w NM9..MMI BLACK & VEATCH TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM NO. 13 �b CI + u County Sanitation Districts of Orange County B&V Project 24349320 Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications B&V File El at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-06 October 13, 1993 SEPTAGE RECEIVING AND DISPOSAL SURVEY AND WASTE HAULER SURVEY PURPOSE The purpose of Job No.P1-46 is to provide a permanent, operational hauled waste dumping site at the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County's (CSDOCs) Plant No. 1. Present planning calls for retaining eusting Wastehauler Facility in service, with modifications to provide a reliable, fully operational facility and to reduce maintenance requirements. The Septage Receiving and Disposal Survey and the Waste Haulers Survey have been conducted m to assess the benefits and shortcomings of other similarly sized and/or operated facilities, as well as CSDOCs, and implement the findings in suggested improvements for the facility. The purpose of this Technical Memorandum is to present the findings of the two surveys conducted by Black & Veatch: 1.) the Septage Receiving and Disposal Survey identifies several wastewater treatment plants in the western United States that have facilities similar ;t„ ) to those of CSDOCs,which accept and treat sepmge and in some cases, grease, and 2)the Waste Hauler Survey represents a random sampling of waste haulers that have permits for dumping at CSDOCs Plant No. 1, and frequently discharge at the facility. 0 SUMMARY OF PRINCIPLE FINDINGS The Septage Receiving and Disposal Survey provides detailed information about the operation of eight septage receiving facilides. This data can be used for comparison and evaluation of CSDOCs Wastehauler Facility in terms of existing features and future modifications The larger wastewater treatment plants surveyed, with nominal capacities of 100 million gallons per day (mgd) or greater, which accept both septage and grease, have gravity feed systems. The plants that operate pumping systems have nominal capacities less than 25 mgd and generally have some form of pretrastment to remove large debris from the wastestream before it is pumped to the plant influent. d The Waste Hauler Survey provides practical information from three waste hauler companies that regularly discharge at CSDOCs Wastehauler Facility. In geneml,the waste haulers favor a drive-thru facility to the temporary facility, and requested more substantial washdown provisions. e 24349MO M14 BLACK& VEATCH TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 13 Page 2 Id County Sanitation Districts of Orange County B&V Project 24349320 Chemical and Wastehatt er Facility Modifications October 13, 1993 at Plant No. 1, Job No. PI-06 w BACKGROUND The CSDOC Wastehauler Facility is located new the main entrance at Plant No. 1 in .» Fountain Valley, and has rwo discharge bays at a drive-through station and operators booth. Each bay has a 4-inch port that discharges into a common 20,000 gallon wetwell and pumping station. The pumping station transfers septage,grease,and other liquid wastes to the 78-inch interplant pipeline. The interplant pipeline conveys these wastes and other waste streams to CSDOC's Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. High maintenance demands and equipment failures due to flood damage and plugging have resulted in CSDOC taking the facility out of service until operational problems could be corrected To date, the relatively new facility has only been in full operation for approximately four days. Currently a temporary, or secondary, dump site located new the northwest corner of the Metering and Diversion Structure is in operation and is adequately meeting CSDOC's waste disposal needs This site consists of two dump ports discharging by gravity directly to the interplant pipeline. Upcoming construction at Plant No. 1 will soon eliminate access to this secondary dump site. The purpose of Job No. P146 is to provide a permanent operational dump site. If CSDOC chooses to place the Wastehauler Facility in service again, modifications and w improvements are needed to render the facility reliable and fully operational and reduce maintenance requirements. The surveys have been conducted in order to provide insight to the operation of facilities and to integrate the findings in proposed improvements to CSDOC's facilities. Standard questionnaires were developed for both the Septage Receiving and Disposal Survey and the Waste Haulers Survey to formalize and unify the cowersations with plant personnel and operators. Blank questionnaires are included as Appendix A. v SEPTAGE RECEIVING AND DISPOSAL SURVEY Eight wastewater treatment plants responded to the Septage Receiving and Disposal Survey. Each plant representative was asked a series of standard questions regarding the plant, the septage and grease receiving facility,and operational procedures. Additional information was b4 requested as appropriate regarding improvements they would like to see in a new facility, reliability and ease of operation of their system,maintenance requirements,and fee schedules. a 24349MM14 w `r October 13, 1993 Item 1, in the amount of $1,284.00, is for removal and dis sal of a .• portion of an existing concrete ramp. Upon excavation for the ne building expansion, an old drainage line was found to be leaking. The co tractor was directed to remove a portion of the concrete ramp which cove d the leaking pipe d to determine the extent of damage and the necesary correc ' e measures. This item does not include costs for repairing the pipeline or r lacing the concrete. 1 Item 2, in the amount of $564.00, is for m ifications to a computer enclosure, located in the Operations Center Buildin at Plant No. 1 included as part of this job. These modifications include providin a plastic laminate back, adding four access doors, and increasing the overall ight of the computer enclosure cabinet. .n Item 3, in the amount of $4,8 .00 and an additional 12 calendar days, is for added structural details to the a vator pit and elevator walls in the new building expansion. Item 4 is a 14-calend day time extension to settle a claim for time lost in transit and in review of the nsurance and contract documents, and delay in issuing the Notice to Proce . The above de ribed changes would have been included in the original design if discovered o known in the design phase. If the Di ctors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date this contract will be $6,685.00 with 26 calendar days time extension. T s represents an increase of 0.03% over the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for a net addition of $6,6 .00 and 26 calendar days time extension to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. 9191: AUTHORITY TO AWARD CONTRACT TO CONSTRUCT PHASE I WASTEHAVLER DUMPING FACILITIES MODIFICATIONS, JOB NO P1-46-1. In July 1993, the Directors awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Black & Veatch for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications, Jobs Nos. P1-46 and P2-55. At Plant No. 1, we have a dump facility that accepts trucked wastes from septic systems as well as certain high-solids industrial waste that are ., trucked to the plant by wastehaulers. It is the only one of its kind in the area. u 5 October 13, 1993 Although our wastehauler dump facility is relative new, it has experienced continual problems because of clogging of the system which results in high maintenance. When the system was designed, the significant amount of debris that is often in the trucked wastes was unknown. The Districts have retained Black & Veatch to investigate the problems with the wastehauler dump facility and design modifications to make corrections. Our existing primary backup dump site must be closed soon for replacement of our influent gates, which is being done under separate contract. Since the completion .� of the modifications will extend beyond the time for this work, staff is recommending the dumping facility modifications be phased. The Phase I work would include the construction of two dump ports and two parallel 12-inch diameter gravity pipelines from the northeast corner of the wastehauler road to the 78-inch diameter interplant pipeline beneath the North ,p Road near the Metering and Diversion structure at Plant No. 1 . The two 12-inch sewers will be installed so that they will also be able to serve the future modified wastehauler dump facility. In addition, locating these dump ports on the wastehauler road on the east side of the plant will maintain wastehauler truck traffic in the manner intended for the existing wastehauler station and prevent wastehaulers from entering the secured main treatment plant. a+ In order to expedite this work, staff is requesting authority for the General Manager to advertise, receive bids and award a contract for the Phase I work to the low bidder in an amount not to exceed the estimate of $200,000. a 9(h): APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ELECTRIFICATION OF lI PUMP DRIVES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-36-1; �'� SECURITY AND LANDSCAPING ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1 . JOB NO. P1-38-1; r, MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOBS NOS. P1-38-4; AND MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-43-3. w This project combines several jobs designed by both consultants and staff. The several projects have been combined by staff into a larger contract to t-, reduce administrative costs as well as to attract lower combined bids through economies of scale. w -6- A RESOLUTION NO. 93-150 AWARDING JOB NO. P1-46-1 w A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, l4 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PHASE I WASTERAULER DUMPING FACILITIES MODIFICATIONS, JOB NO. P1-46-1 ++t++t+++t+tt+ttttt+tt+++tt++++ttt The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. In accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Boards of Directors, on April 30, 1993 , authorized filing a Notice of Exemption in connection with the proposed project for Phase I Wastehauler Dumping Facilities Modifications, Job No. P1-46-1; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day ". submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director _ of Engineering that award of contract be made to Dorado Enterprises Inc. for Phase I Wastehauler Dumping Facilities Modifications, Job No. P1-46-1, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3 . That the contract for Phase I Wastehauler Dumping Facilities Modifications, Job No. P1-46-1, be awarded to Dorado Enterprises Inc. in the total amount of $248, 953. 00 in t, ,e accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2 , 3, 5, v 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General counsel; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby v rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1993. o rc3bj.150 V a a STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, PENNY KYLE, Assistant Secretary of the Hoards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify y that the foregoing Resolution No. 93-150 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Boards on the loth day of November, 1993 , by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Fred Barrera, Bob Bell, George Brown, Buck Catlin, John Collins, John C. Cox, Jr. , Jan Debay, - James Flora, Don R. Griffin, John M. Gullixson, Barry Hammond, Evelyn Hart, Gail Kerry, Victor Leipzig, Thomas E. Lutz, William D. Mahoney, Eva Miner, Ted Moreno, Carrey J. Nelson, Glenn - Parker, Iry Pickler, Leslie Pontious, Charles E. Puckett, Margie Rice, Earle Robitaille, Thomas R. Saltarelli, Phil Sansone, Sal Sapien, Jim Silva, W Sheldon Singer, Roger Stanton, William G. Steiner, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James Wahner, Henry Wedaa, George L. 2laket NOES: None ABSENT: Maria Moreno O IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 1 on behalf ` of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, this loth day of November, 1993. xi" .. Pennyex ex Kyle s ant Secretary Boards of Mrewrs, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , - 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of orange County, California r r r r r r Ocean Outfall Booster r r r r r r r r r r RESOLUTION NO. 90-2 ,r APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 6 TO AGREEMENT WITH JOHN LAKULLO ENGINEERS FOR—DESIGN F -JOB NO. -1 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 6 TO AGREEMENT WITH r JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-15, PROVIDING FOR A REALLOCATION OF COSTS AMONG CATEGORIES WITHIN SAID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preliminary design (Phase I) of Ocean Outfall Booster r Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15; and, r WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for additional services re final design (Phase II) of Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, r Job No. J-15; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for additional services r relative to soils surveying and mapping and for engineering services required for shop drawing review and factory testing of the major equipment to be prepurchased; and, r WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to said agreement provided for additional services to coordinate the design of a 69 kv electrical substation needed to service `+ Plant No. 2 with the Southern California Edfson Company; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 4 to said agreement provided for construction r services required in connection with Surge Tower Modifict Ions at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15-1, and for additional design services re connection of pre-chlorination facilities for the Districts' Emergency Discharge Point No. 003 " at Treatment Plant No. 2; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No.•5 provided for engineering services required during r r r construction of Job No. J-15; and, r WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said agreement to provide for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: ,., Section 1. That Addendum No. 6 dated January 10, 1990, to that certain agreement dated May 11, 1983, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, " acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and John Carollo Engineers, for design of Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, providing for a reallocation r of costs among the categories within said agreement, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said reallocation of costs shall be as follows and shall not change the maximum authorized compensation of $3,301,692.00: r FROM: TO: r Direct Labor plus Overhead at 143% $2,821,870.00 $2,808,842.00 Direct Expenses 46,972.00 60,000.00 r Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for r itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby r authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 6 in form approved by the General Counsel . r PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held January 10, 1990. r r r r STATE OF CALIFORNIA) " ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) r I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 90-2 was '+ passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Boards on the loth day of January, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: r AYES: Margaret M. Arnold, Wes Bannister, Roland E. Bigonger, Jahn ,r C. Cox, Jr. , Orma 0. Crank, Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, James M. Ferryman, Beth Graham, Harry S. Green, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Evelyn Hart, Ursula E. Kennedy, William D. Mahoney, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Chris Norby, Bob Perry, Iry r Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard T. Polis, Don R. Roth, Phil Sansone, Sally Anne Sheridan, J.R. "Bob" Siefen, Jim Silva, Don E. Smith, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, Paul Verellen, Henry W. Medea, Wayne D. Wedin, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Arthur G. Newton, Wayne Silzel r IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 1 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, this loth day of January, 1990. - r Rita J. Brorwn;Secretary Boards of Directors, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, il, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California r r r =WfY SANITATIGN DISSRICM OF 01WM COOI7M Page 1 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENGE FOtIIT1'AIId VALLEY, CALIFORM� 92708 CHANGE (IIU1Elt C. 0. NO. Twenty-two (22) CONSFACIOA: ADVANCO CONSMUMIOR.S. INC. DATE March 14. 1990 JOB: OCEAN CUTFALL BOO= STATION "C" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB N0. J-15 m Amxmut of this Change Order (Add) (DaducL) $_126,321.14 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authcrized and as compensation therefor, the .. following addit== to or aRl=t;mns from. the contract price are herby approved. = 1 - 96-n CE Byrn= VALVE In July 1987, while modifications were being perfor-1 on Surge Taxes No. 2, it was discovered that the valve disc of the 96-inch butterfly valve at the base of the tower was cracked. Preparations began for engineering and replacement with a new valve (existing valve could not be repaired) . The Contractor was instructed to purchase a new valve and modify the 66-inch by-pass elbow as per Change Order No. 17, Item 4, dated July 12, 1989. The Contractor has now been inatri.rtai to install the new valve and elbow when the conditions are the most ideal such as law flows into the plants, lowest possible tides and the beaches being the least utilized. The project was extremely sensitive in nature and critical to the Districts that it be perfonmed without consequences. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH 077A) ADDED COST IBIS CHANGE ORDER r1EK* S 110,712.00 TIME E7C1'E[QSICN THIS CHANCE ORDER rIEM: 0 Calendar Days .d =4 2 - REFDVAL OF SHIPPING SHIMS Due to the late submittal of handling and shipping date for the five 110,000 GPM r pumps, which was over one year after the drawings were produced and nine months after the J-15 contract was awarded and thus unaware of this requirement, the Contractor was directed to remove the shipping shine between the wear rings. This was extra work and was performed on a time and material basis. (Reference May 26, 1989 and September 26, 1989 District Letters) The amount of this change order was recovered fr= J-15A Contractor by Change Order No. 5 on Job No. J-15A. ADDED COST TEIS CHANGE CFZER ITEM: $ 3,616.00 T11E EXIEMIM THLS CHANGE ORDER =: 0 Calendar Days "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(b)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 4 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FtT.T AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIECRPIIA 92708 CHANCE CADFR C. O. NO. Twenty-two (22) CONTRACTOR: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE March 14. 1990 .. JOB: OCEAN OUTTAIL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. J-15 ITEM 3 - FLUSH OIL SUPPLY UNITS The Contractor was directed to flush the oil supply units for the lubrication of ,. the five 110,000 GPM pumps furnished under Job No. J-15A. Work was performed on a time and material basis. (Reference September 26, 1987 District letter. ) The amount of this change order item was recovered from J-15A Contractor by Change Order No. 5 on Job No. J-15A. ADDED COST THIS CHANCE CPJ= MEN: $ 743.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER 111224: 0 Calendar Days ITM 4 - MODIFY LUSE OIL PIPING A portion of the horizontal section of the five 110,000 GPM pimps lute oil return lines were :ceased from 1-inch diameter to 2-inch diameter and the majority of this horizontal line was modified, after previously being installed, by relocating the 2-itch vertical drop as close to the pimps as possible instead of being located at the oil storage tanks. Also a h,-inch vent line was added at the vertical drop. This modification was necessary due to a poor piping design that would not allow the lute oil to return properly. The combination of oil .. viscosity, Piping layout and return size created a condition in which oil was overflowing the bearing housing. The Contractor was directed to perfommthe required modifications on a time and materials basis. The amount of this change order item was recovered from J-15A Contractor by Change Order No. 5 on Job No. J-15A. (Reference August 7, 1989 and September 26, 1989 District letters). ADDED COST THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,057.00 `r TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER IMN: 0 Calendar Days >TIN - OVERTIME PAg-Ulm During the period of June 4 - October 1, 1989, the Districts were under new Southern California Edison rates with severe penalties for peaking during certain hours of the day. To avoid excessive electrical usage rates, the Contractor was directed to perform equipment testing during off hours which resulted in the pay- ment of overtime premium. This work was accooplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. (Reference -• District letter June 5, 1989. ) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER rM: $ 3,027.71 TLME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "D-2- AGENDA ITEM N9(b)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" CMUM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUMN Page 3 of 4 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FELTS AVENUE fa2WLlN VA=, CALIFCSNIA 92708 .. CHANCE ORDER C. 0. NO. Twenty-two (221 CCNTRALTCR:_ ADVANCO OONSTRUCTORS, INC. DATE Mash 14. 1990 JOB: CLEAN OUPFAIL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PIANT NO. 2, JOB NJ. J-15 ITEM 6 - REPLACE RELAYS The five relays for the start/stop switches on the het well transfer panel were orignally designed from 120-volt AC current. It was derernumed the relays should have been 105-volt DC. The Contractor was directed to replace the five relays. This work was acoosplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)B of the General Provisions. r ADDED CC6'T THIS CHANGE ORDER TTEM: $ 1,165.43 TIME EXT MION THIS CHANGE CRDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days .. TOTAL ADDED CST THIS CHANCE ORDER: $ 126,321.14 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS ONCE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be perforned incidental to the prise work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously ^� issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Ceder. 'r SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIML Original Contract Date July 20, 1987 .. Original Contract Time 940 Calendar Days Original Coapletion Date February 13, 1990 Time Extension This C.O. 0 Calendar Days .y Total Time Extension 74 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 1014 Calendar Days Revised Ccapletion Date April 28, 1990 Actual Final Ccupletion Date February 2, 1990 Tice Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable .. Original Contract Price $18,476,243.00 Prev. Path. Changes $ 978,226.61 This Change (Add) (Dsduci)S 126,321.14 Aaended Contract Price $19,580,790.75 d. "D-3" AGENDA ITEM N9(b) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3" COUNW SAl nvn SW DISTRICTS CF ORANM =IIY Page 4 of 4 P. O. BOX M7 - 10844 RT-1 AVENUE r FWWaN VALTZY, (aMUUOU[A 92708 CRANC£ ORDER C. 0. NO. Twenty-too (22) OWERACTOR: ADVANCO CO SMZUCTCRS, INC. DATE March 14. 1990 JOB: OCEAN OUTFAII. BOO= S=CN "C" AT FLANT No. 2, JOB No. J-15 Board Authorization Date: March 14, 1990 COUWY SANIZA CN DIS UCM OF ORANCZ CIJUNTY, CALMIMOMA P )3cMME = BY: r Q©• 2-� ction Manager Date r ADVANCO C2ZTWJC.rORS, INC. ACCEPTED BY: APPROVED BY: rI D to Of swir mmim Data 02/14/90 IMD:jm r r "D-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(b)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-4" r cL 1mw�6.�.e �J- , s A w. .w yl 18 December 1990 To: B. Webster Fm: V. Zorzynski .. Sub3 : GOBS Problems The following are problems at OOBS that need attention in order to ,w provide a reliable, automated pump station. 1 . We need software to provide the necessary control functions to provide for lead, lag, laglag, and standby automation. Currently we have only lead pump automation. This was developed by Mike Herrera. The original concept as developed by Carollo Engineers . did not work in our situation. Steps are currently being taken to .d provide for this new software. A specification was written and is currently being viewed by Fisher Porter for feasibility and price quotation. Attached is a copy of what was submitted to Fisher Porter. 2. The mysterious shutdowns and loss of control problems are being investigated by General Electric. Attached are copies of the most recent shutdowns. 3. Magnetic flux continues to be a problem. The modifications ,r General Electric performed did not work. It is my understanding that Construction Management is investigating means toeliminate the problem. The magnetic field may be the source of many of the unexplainable shutdowns. 4. Numerous hardware deficiencies exist. They are being taken care of one at a time through the cooperative efforts of GE, Fisher Porter, and District personnel. r r r r r `J , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' •. i � G�� -6 d ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA June 10, 1991 ��I" ( +me.nus Av IC-1 P.m Box Bin JR)69btu+ r M EMO RAND V� V To: Ed Hodges .e Fr: Gerald Jones Sub: Controls Related Problems at the Ocean Outfall Booster Station The following list contains the items that have been reoccurring problems at the Ocean Out£all Booster Station. 1. The GE drives continue to develop stack faults. These +' faults prevent the drive from starting in a normal sequence of operation. A hard restart is required to clear the stack faut at the drive before it can be started from the automatic control sequence. -- 2. The GE drives generate speed control problems which result in the loss of automatic speed control from the Fischer and Otl Porter distributed control. The drives will ramp up and down until the internal control requirements are stabilized. The unit will then return to DCD control. 3 . The fiber optic network from the LCI to the CEU still doesn't function properly. When the system is functioning the alarms which are activated and the reset of those alarms lag approximately 5 minutes after they occur. 4. We have been experiencing difficulties with the Saber II Emulex drives in the Distributed Operators Consoles (DOC) . We have found that the drives are no longer manufactured. Based on our information, this may make the availability of the drive suspect in the future. Fischer and Porter is currently checking for a replacement drive. The No. 2 DOC is currently out of service because of this problem. 5. The No. 1 DOC has been generating error messages which we are not able to verify. These errors very and cannot be attributed to a hardware failure. 6. There were wiring changes made to the control circuit of the LCI 's during the seven day test. These changes were made as a temporary fix but have not been corrected. It will take a complete wiring change of the control circuits in the Control Room to correct the problem. .d June 10, 1991 Problems at the Ocean Outfall Booster Station Page 2 7. There has been discussion in the past as to the possibility of changing the Fischer and Porter software to a set point control system instead of a sequence control system. The current software does not employ a security module which could be programmed to supervise the operation of the control system and would provide for a controlled response for a failure in the system. GJ:hh cc: Art Groves Bernie Lebrun Dan Dexter Dale Brooks Mike Herrera Vic 2orzynski r r �1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Al ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA - November 22, 1991 IWAA ELUS AVENUE PO BOx 9127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFMNIA 92728412) O111 ESE-tan MINUTES OF MEETING - Job No. J-15A Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Speed Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2 .. DATE: November 6, 1991 ATTENDEES: Peter Wolfson, OCSD Ed Hodges, OCSO Bob Ooten, OCSD Mark Esquer, OCSO Vic Zorzynski , OCSD Bernie Lebrun, OCSD Gerald Jones, OCSD Mike Herrera, OCSD ^° Doug Cook, OCSD Bill Knopf, JCE Diep Nguyen, RE Sarwan Wason, RE Larry Wells, Fischer & Porter - Frank Stieber, Fischer & Porter The purpose of the meeting covered in the following was to discuss resolutions for problems relative to the Ocean Outfall Booster station. 1. Training Schedule Discussion occurred regarding the training schedule. Peter Wolfson referred y to a letter received from Fischer & Porter. He stated that the Districts has had a loss in personnel from Fischer & Porter which has hurt the project. Mark Esquer asked what F&P can do about the problem. Frank Stieber said that a schedule will be developed after all items of concern have been discussed at the meeting. 2. Hardware Mike Herrera discussed problems with the disk drives and their future replacements. In regard to the DOC 1000 Frank stated they would maintain the DOC 1000. Frank also said that the disk drives can be changed out, but that the graphics generator is different. Frank stated that the hardware in the future could be a problem. F&P stated that their agreement for repair and replacement covers a period of seven years. The contract specifications for hardare were discussed. Mike Herrera reiterated that spare parts and hardware availability are the area of concern. d. Meeting Minutes November 6, 1991 Page Two The reason for the lockups were then discussed. Fischer and Porter said that a modem link should be set up so the messages can be analyzed. Mike said that this has been tried. Peter said that the magnetic field in the room created interference in the modem link. This will be looked at to determined the cause of the lockups. 3. Fiber Optic Link to the LCI 's Peter stated that this has not been operable yet. He stated that DOC 1 is ® usually where the failures occur. Gerry Jones will provide a list for Fischer & Porter describing the failures. - 4. Timing Peter stated that the critical timing has to be secured by March and April to coinside with the start-up of the Central Generation project. All software, maintenance and other problems need to be resolved. Frank stated that Fischer & Porter will investigate the field strength in the room. In regard to the hardware issues, he will recommend any upgrades needed and suggested maintaining spares. Peter stated that the J15A project has not been closed out and that Fischer & Porter needs to make the system operable to be accepted as complete. Gerry Jones discussed problems with the hardware. The seven day test has revealed many of these problems, but they have not been resolved. The hardware in the DCU system is considered below standards. Some changes were made to get through the seven day test. Gerry stated that a spooler was bad that the Districts has not gotten replaced. Delays were caused in the alarm system. The problems to be resolved are as follows for GOBS: DCU's - They are operating in an acceptable manner now. Locking up v, of monitoring systems and interfacing are the major problems. ° Spooler failure ° Fiber optic link Micro DCI's - Program doesn't allow for pump control . Peter said that Fischer & Porter should be responsible for insuring that the installation of the wiring to their equipment is per specifications and that F&P should be overseeing the installation. Fischer & Porter, per specifications, was responsible to GE and Advanco for satisfactory installation of equipment. These items will also be discussed with GE. Mark Esquer asked that a separate meeting be held with GE and Fischer & Porter to discuss this matter. Meeting Minutes November 6, 1991 Page Three 5. Software Mike Herrera wants Fischer & Porter to do the writing of the software if we do decide to stay with Fischer & Porter. The estimate of the changes to the ,y PID software was discussed. Fischer & Porter stated that the estimate for the changes at $55,000.00 was low. Peter stated that Fisher & Porter needs to let the Districts know how the system will be reliable before any changes are made. ,. 6. Conclusion Mark Esquer requested that Fischer & Porter submit a proposal of solutions to all the problems that have been discussed. Fischer & Porter said that a programmer will be out to deal with the software problems with the interface. Peter requested that a field representative from Fischer & Porter be present that week. Frank said that Fischer & Porter will have a representative present that week that can explain problem with the messages. Gerry said he would send information to Fischer & Porter regarding the problems with the software. Mark Esquer said that they want to go from a sequence control to a set point control . Peter said that a decision has not been made on this. Fischer & Porter will submit a proposal for the problems that need to be d resolved including costs for the changes to the hardware. In regard to the change over to the set point control , Peter said this will be resolved within the Districts before it is discussed with Fischer & Porter. Frank said he understands the issues and will work first on hardware. Frank will send a letter to the Districts with copies to Sarwan Wason, Gerry Jones and Doug Cook. Gerry Jones will gather information and submit to Fischer & Porter as soon as possible. Frank also asked for a copy of the error ., messages from the DOC. Peter asked that the information be saved on any crashes in the future for Fischer & Porter's reference. d Meeting Adjourned at 4:00. t, S i ed App ved by e. V� V w� . April 14, 1993 It is therefore proposed to evaluate and recommend alterna ' s to provide secondary effluent from the Plant No. 2 secondary facilit Items for consideration will include gravity and pump facilities, filtration onstructability and costs. The evaluation will also address the effects of a ne filtration system to be installed at the existing plant water station (Job No. P2- -1) on the quality of the plant water. Diaester Gas Compressors. An eval tion of the plant water used for cooling digester gas compressors is propos to determine the feasibility of providing an improved cooling system t xtend the service life of the compressors. The plant water now used for coolin , partly because of the water quality problem .. discussed above, may not be the st cooling source. Alternatives include a closed loop cooling system for the di ter gas compressors with filtration and chemical treatment. The evaluation ' address water quality and flow requirements and determine the best water ource for the cooling system. Staff is re mmending that the Selection Committee be authorized to a, solicit proposals d negotiate a professional services agreement providing for engineering a uation, preparation of design and plans and specifications, for Chemical a Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-46, and Che ical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.-55. Follo ng the Selection Committee's negotiations, the agreement will be presented to a Directors for consideration. 9lg1: RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CH2M HILL FOR EXPANSION OF EXISTING COMPUTERIZED MONITORING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AT PLANTS 1 AND 2. JOB NO. J-31. Over the past few years the Directors have approved contracts to install computer systems to monitor and operate various portions of the treatment plant processes. These include the control system for the Ocean Outfall Booster Station m (OOBS) at Plant No. 2, a new pump station telemetry system for outlying pumping stations, replacement of the existing obsolete computer monitoring system at Plant No. 2, and a new computer monitoring system for Plant No. 1. The Districts currently operate 31 local computer control systems installed under several different plant projects. _ t. The largest of the Districts' computer instrumentation projects are Jobs Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44, Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, respectively, bid together at a cost of $3.8 million. This project is now underway. When completed, this -11- April 14, 1b_ baseline system will allow access to different process monitoring units from various l' locations throughout the plants and provide an orderly method to sound necessary alarms and store process data. However, additional work is needed to complete the system, including the intertie of the 31 existing and planned additional computer monitoring systems. This work was not included in the original contract because all of the systems were not complete and there was no way of knowing exactly what would be required until now. .� It now appears that this work could best be combined with other needed _ work, including the upgrade of the control system for OOBS. It is also recommended that computer graphics, representing new plant processes which have been added since the J-23-2 and P2-44 supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) project was awarded, be added to assist staff in operating and controlling the facilities. ,y About five years ago, the OOBS control system was installed. Since then, the control system has not met expectations, The system was installed under Job No. J-15A, which has yet to be accepted by the Directors because of several outstanding items, all of which are being resolved with the contractor. However, the specific computer control system is based on now-outdated technologies and, in fact, various pieces of hardware already cannot be replaced because manufacturers no longer make the parts. Therefore, it may be less costly �. to replace the system than continue to maintain it. (We have not paid the original contractor for this work, reserving funds to insure that deficient portions, or the complete system, can be replaced.) e. Jobs Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 include the installation of new computer monitoring systems. The specifications for those projects required that the contractor install equipment which could receive and deliver messages to and from the OOBS computer control system. This requirement was common to each manufacturer who bid the project, i.e., each has a different language and had to interlink their system with the existing OOBS system. Since the OOBS computer control system is not satisfactory, staff believes it would compound the OOBS problems to tie the system into the Districts-wide monitoring computer network. Therefore, in December 1992, the intertie was deleted and a credit for $87,438.00 was received. p The credit for deleting the intertie to the GOBS computer control system, added to the cost of replacing worn out hardware, is approximately equal to the cost of designing and building a simpler system using the most modern technology; that is, programmable logic computer-based control equipment (PLCs). Our staff is familiar with PLC equipment since we have about thirty separate functions now in -12- April 14, 1993 .. 'progress using the PI-Cs. Parts replacement is much simpler; there are no hard drives as the older GOBS computer control systems contain. Therefore, staff believes that the OOBS project should be reanalyzed by control systems engineers who can make recommendations about whether the staff position is correct and find the most economical way to upgrade the reliability of the existing DOSS control system, either by repair or replacement. To address these issues, in January the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals for a professional services agreement for Expansion p of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31 . The Selection Committee has negotiated a professional services agreement with CH2M Hill to prepare the design plans and specifications, and provide construction support services, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, for an amount not to exceed $690,148.00. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. _ 9(h): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR STANDBY POWER RELIABILITY MODIFICATIONS. JOB NO, J-33, AND OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES. JOB NO. J-34. - At the regular meeting in December, the Directors received a report from staff regarding the major impacts on our facilities of the intense rain storm which passed through Orange County on December 7, 1992. That storm produced the highest flows ever treated through the plant, a rate of 485 million gallons per day, sustained for about two hours. Staff was very pleased that the facilities were able to handle this flow without major incident, nonetheless we have had several debriefing meetings to analyze the storm effects and the operational lessons that could be learned from the storm and where our system needs improvement to minimize potential failures during emergency situations such as were experienced on December 7. -13- July 14, 1993 Amount, including - 200 Hours Tune Up Firm Allowance - - 1 . Carnot, Tustin, CA $177,300 2. West Coast Environmental, Ventura, CA 186,361 3. South Coast Environmental Company, Orange, CA 140,567 Staff has reviewed these proposals and recommends that a purchase order in an amount not to exceed $140,567, including tax, be issued to South Coast Environmental Company. 11 (d): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 8 TO PREPURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE SYSTEM AND PUMPS FOR OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-15A. m In September 1986 General Electric Company was awarded a $4 million contract to provide five 120 million-gallon-a-day pumps, drive shafts and variable frequency drive systems, complete with all auxiliary equipment, control panels and accessories required for a complete functional system for the new 480 mgd (one pump is standby) Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2. Change Order No. 8 has five contract modifications or items of additional work for no net monetary additions or deductions to the contract with General Electric Company, and grants a time extension of 1,500 calendar days. e. Item 1, for no cost, is for reduction of retention. Retention will be reduced as the project is completed. Item 2, for no cost, is for deleting insurance requirements since the contract work has been completed. Item 3, for no cost, is a time extension to the contract for 1 ,500 calendar days. The original contract work was essentially completed on July 11, 1989. However, the contractor performed research to make needed modifications to reduce noise levels from the motors when they are running. This was done at no m cost to the contract. While the motors and pumps have performed exceptionally well, they did �^ not, initially, pass tests for noise. They have been operational and have been in use since installation. The noise problem, however, required resolution. There are many factors which could contribute to excessive noise of running motors; one of d -4- July 14, 1993 them is the quality of the power supplied to the motors. If the power has excessive "harmonics", i.e. slightly out of phase power components, the noise produced by the motors can be excessive. This was the case with the Ocean Outfall Booster Station. The noise exceeded that allowed in the specifications, - although the noise levels were not excessive for the workers, according to the State Health Code. Nonetheless, GE undertook research to modify the motors to reduce the noise. The research was done at a GE plant in Canada. Once completed, one of the motors was shipped to Canada for retrofit and tested. The test was successful in Canada and the motor was reinstalled in the pumping plant where it performed well. GE is reconditioning each of the other four motors (there are five motors in the pump station) in the same way at a local plant. Item 4, for no cost, is a release of a District claim against the contractor for the control system which has not functioned as designed. The specifications included ,.� power criteria obtained during the design phase from Southern California Edison (SCE). The power quality in the contract documents based on the information from SCE was not the same as the power quality actually supplied by SCE at the time the motors were tested, several years later. The control system is in use and has _ been in use since the original installation, however, it has been plagued with maintenance problems, and now many of the parts are no longer manufactured. GE installed the control system in accordance with the plans and specifications and met the intent of the specifications. The manufacturer has offered to retrofit the system, but staff has no confidence in the manufacturer's ability to produce a reliable system (GE is not the manufacturer in this case. The specified system was manufactured by Fischer-Porter). Because many of the components which were manufactured by third-tier companies are no longer made, and because of the reliability issue, connection of this facility to the new plant-wide computer monitoring system was deleted by change order. The credit received by deleting that connection will approximately pay for the cost of a new control system that will be connected to the plant computer network. The cost today of a control system appears to be much less than eight years ago when this project was designed. Additionally, the new control system will be based on programmable logic controllers (PLCs) which can be obtained from many manufacturers; therefore, we will hopefully avoid the problem of needing replacement parts which cannot be obtained. Overall, GE has performed in an exemplary manner on this control system to make it right, as well as the manufacture of the pumping equipment; however, the problem is in the Fischer-Porter equipment. .e Item 5, for no cost, is for the contract to furnish 20 days of professional electrical power (high voltage) engineering from GE in consideration of the release of the District claim described in Item 4. 5 July 14, 1993 If the Directors approve this change order, the total of the change orders to date on this contract will be ($204,849.82) with 1,555 calendar days time extension. This represents a decrease of 5.1 % from the original contract amount. Staff believes this is an equitable resolution of the issues and recommends approval of Change Order No. 8 for no added costs to or deductions from the contract with General Electric Company. As noted above, there is a 1,500-calendar day time extension associated with this change order. 11(a): APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTABLISHING BID DATE ` FOR SEISMIC RETROFIT AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-53-1. The Directors have previously taken several actions providin enhancements which increase the ability of the treatment plants to withstand the i acts of a major earthquake, all in accordance with the 1989 Master Plan. A three hase approach is in progress. First, an earthquake training exercise was conduct to review safety aspects, establish procedures and develop an emergency man ement organizational framework. This occurred after months of planning and de lopment of formal procedures. Separately, the Directors have authorized st to proceed with non- _ structural modifications to the treatment plant. This w k includes the tiedown of equipment, pipes, utilities, etc., to ensure that they a secure during an earthquake and is being accomplished either by Districts' staff r included in various other construction contracts. Lastly, in October 1990, a Directors approved geotechnical and structural investigations of Districts' faciliti s, focusing on older facilities designed under less stringent criteria. The investigations identified B d C Headworks at Treatment Plant No. 2 as the highest rehabilitation priority and, i November 1991, the Directors authorized Dames and Moore to design a seismi retrofit to these facilities, including this project, Job No. P2-53-1. The Headworks a one of the most important facilities in the ` treatment process. All raw sewa is pumped into the plants from below ground sewers at the Headworks. In a ition to the pumping of the sewage, debris and sand (grit) are removed. Severe d age to these structures would eliminate our ability to pump incoming sewage thr gh the treatment plant and to the ocean outfall. The most cost effective dama a prevention measures, recommended by Dames and d, Moore, include structure modifications necessary to correct those deficiencies which would render the facil' ies unsafe or unusable, but would not include total damage prevention. For axe ple, cracks and other minor damage will still occur in a major earthquake. The r rofit of Headworks B and C will not include the solidification of liquefiable so' in the areas surrounding B and C Headworks. The geotechnical portion of t a work, a specialty item, has been eliminated from this project to avoid -6- Page 1 of 5 4' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 - CHANGE ORDER r C.O. N0, Eipht 181 DATE: July 14, 1993 r CONTRACTOR: General Electric Company JOB: Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Freguency Drive Systems an ,r Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No 2 Job No J-15A CONSULTANT: John Carollo Engineers .. Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deedust) S 0.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. r ITEM 1 - REDUCTION OF RETENTION The Districts currently hold $387,046.18 in retention. The only remaining work is warranty work which has been delayed pending completion of research work by General Electric. This item is for reduction of project retention as warranty work is completed. Total retention will be reduced to $50,000.00, in accordance with the following schedule as the items are completed: .. Work Item Maximum Retention Existing Retention $387,046.18 A) Motor #1 modifications $280,872.00 B) Motor #2 modifications $224,698.00 C) Motor #3 modifications $168,524.00 D) Motor #4 modifications $112,350.00 E) Motor #5 modifications $ 50,000.00 r This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. There is no cost associated with this change order. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days r "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" w Page 2 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER d C.O. NO. Eiaht (8) DATE: July 14. 1993 CONTRACTOR: General Electric Cgmganv JOB: Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-15A CONSULTANT: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 2 - DELETE INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS b This item is for deleting the requirement for continued insurance coverage. All contract work has been completed with the facilities in service and maintained and operated by the Districts. There is no cost associated with this change order. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3 - TIME EXTENSION The contract work was essentlally completed on July 11, 1989. The contract was held open because the contract required the contractor to perform modifications to the motors in order to reduce the noise level of the motors when in operation. The modifications could not be completed earlier without completion of considerable research by General Electric to determine the cause and the solution for the noise b problem. There are no overall liquidated damages on the contract. This item is for contract time extension only. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1,500 Calendar Days r m+ "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" r Page 3 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE d FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER m _ C.O. NO. Eiaht (81 DATE: July 14, 1993 CONTRACTOR: General Electric Company JOB: Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Freouencv Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-15A CONSULTANT: John Carollo Enoineers V ITEM 4 - FISHER-PORTER CONTROL SYSTEM The control system which was part of the original contract was supplied by Fisher-Porter. The system, as supplied, did not function per the contract criteria. The contractor made many attempts to correct the system, however, the control system has never performed as intended and many of the replacement parts to make the system functional are no longer available. In consideration of Item 5, the Districts will drop the claim against the contractor to make the Fisher-Porter control system function as originally specified in the contract. There is no cost associated with this change order. m ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days m ITEM 5 - CONTRACT LABOR In consideration of the Districts releasing the contractor from correcting the control m system as described in Item 4 above, the contractor agrees to furnish 20 mandays of electrical engineering labor, including all expenses, at no cost to the Districts (estimated $22,000.00). The Districts have a need to use contractor labor on electrical projects by the end of the year. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 0.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 1,500 Calendar Days "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #11 (d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" Page 4 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE r, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER m C.O. NO. Eiaht (8) DATE: July 14. 1993 r _ CONTRACTOR: General Electric Comoanv JOB: Purchase and Installation of Variable Frequency Drive Systems and .. Pumps for Ocean Outfall Boaster Station "C" at Plant No 2 Job No J-1 A CONSULTANT: John Carollo Engineers r The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 1,500 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. W SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date September 30, 1986 Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date September 28, 1988 Time Extension this Change Order 1,500 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 1,555 Calendar Days ' Revised Contract Time 2,285 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Date December 31, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable b Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable �f Original Contract Price $ 4,025,440.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ (204,849,82) This Change (Add) (Beeeet) $ 0.00 Amended Contract Price $ 3,820,590.18 "E-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4" r Page 5 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY _. P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 .y CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Eight (8) DATE: July 14. 1993 y CONTRACTOR: General Electric Company JOB: Preourchase and Installation of Variable Freauencv Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15A CONSULTANT: John Carollo Engineers e Board Authorization Date: July 14, 1993 �+ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: F •�Gic 4�i5143 ngineering Manager Date Construction Manager Date O APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: v , Director of Engineering to Ge er I Counsel Date GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY ACCEPTED BY: Contractor Date ENG\J-15ANW.8 y "E-5" AGENDA ITEM #11 (d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-5" RESOLUTION NO. 94-3 ry ACCEPTING JOB NO -15A AS COMPLETE " A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, -- ACCEPTING PREPURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE SYSTEMS AND PUMPS FOR OCEAN OUTFALL 'm BOOSTER STATION "C" AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-15A, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, General Electric Company, b has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of v+ the contract for Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean outfall Booster v Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15A, on July 11, 1989; and, r Section 2 . That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having ti been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3 . That Prepurchase and Installation of variable Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster a Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15A, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated September 30, 1986; and, r "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" ti Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is 'a hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with General Electric Company, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Frequency Drive Systems and Pumps for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15A, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District r No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of District No. 2, 3, 5, L 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 , are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held January 12, 1994 . RCW.00J r+ �^ "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" V w Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r" 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 - FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: General Electric Company C.O. No.: Nine (9) .. Date: January 12, 1994 Job: Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Freguencv Drive Systems and Pumps for _ Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15A Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Amount of this Change Order (A99)(Deduct) $ (1,166.651 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. DEDUCT ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES N Change in Quantity Item Units Description From To Difference Unit Difference No. Price 2 Days Storage of 365 343 22 53.03 $ (1,166.65) y Equipment •+ DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(1,166.65) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days w r "G-1" AGENDA ITEM a9(e) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: General Electric Company C.O. No.: Nine 191 ` Date: January 12. 1994 Job: Prepurchase and Installation of Variable Frequency Drive Systems and Pumos for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-15A Consultant: John Carollo Engineers .. The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or .; damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME v Original Contract Date: September 30, 1986 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: September 28, 1988 v Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 1555 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 2285 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: December 31, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable r 6� W Original Contract Price $ 4,025,440.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ (204,849,821 „ This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ ( 1 ,166.65) Amended Contract Price $ 3,819,423.53 "G-2" AGENDA ITEM a9(e)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: General Electric Company C.O. No.: Nine (9) Date: January 12, 1994 Job: Preourchase and Installation of Variable Frecuency Drive Systems and Pumns for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-15A Consultant: John Carollo Enaineers Board Authorization Date: January 12, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AI Submitted by:* Recommended by: E gineering Manager ate CoiSstruction Manager Date Ap o Approved as to Form: r ector of En ineenng ate General unseI Date ` Accepted by: ,q /GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY as Contractor Date r "G-3" AGENDA ITEM a9(e)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" r r r ti Odor Control Domes Gfl Ivu. 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS r .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA August 28, 1989 1 e Ew6 AVENUE PO Box 8I27 r FWNTMN VALLEv.GµRpONM 9173B.8111 nln e9zx+, STAFF REPORT Safety Modifications to Circular Clarifier Walkways at Plant No. 2 Odor Control Facilities at Treatment Plants No. 1 and No. 2 Jobs Nos. P1- 5, P1- 6. 132-32, 2- antl - 4 r Change Order No. 18 r The $15.9 million construction contract awarded by the Directors in September 1987 for the construction of Odor Control Facilities at both treatment plants provided adding safety handrails for the existing walkways at the circular ,r clarifiers at Plant No. 2. The existing gunite walkways at Clarifiers H, I , J, K, L, M, N, 0, P, and Q have a clear width of 18 to 20 inches and are used for access to the clarifier effluent launder structure for maintenance of launder level control valves and weir plates. The odor control contract required the Contractor to install hinged covers on all of the launder channels as a means of capturing malodorous air. However, the new launder covers overhang the existing launder walls and reduce the existing Clear walkway width to as little as 14 inches where the new launder covers meet. Article 4, Section 3270, Title 8 of the California Administrative Code states, in part, that, 11(c) Platforms, runways, ramps or other elevated working levels, except catwalks that are 30 inches or more above the floor, ground r or other working area shall be no less that 2 feet wide and have no less than 64 feet clear headroom.-1 r The original contract does not provide for widening, it only provides a means to install a system of handrails along the perimeter of the existing elevated Clarifier walkways. The walkway details were brought to light shortly after the Contractor started the modification work. The Contractor was instructed to stop all walkway related work as a result of information received from the Districts' safety coordinator and safety consultant. In order to comply with the safety requirements, new plans have been prepared r for the construction of modified walkways for the clarifiers at Plant No. 2. Details of construction include those for widening approximately 18,000 square feet of circular reinforced gunite walkway and berm (approximately 550 cubic yards of concrete) , 10 reinforced concrete launder control valve access platforms, 24 reinforced concrete stair structures, 100 feet of reinforced concrete elevated walkway, 425 feet of additional elevated structural aluminum walkway. 510 feet of additional anodized aluminum handrail and 7 new reinforced r concrete retaining walls for gunite walkway and berm construction. r r Staff Report Page Two The net cost for the additional modifications outlined above is $441,048.79. A time extension of 30 calendar days will be required to complete the work. The above-described changes are considered by staff to be corrections which would have been included in the original design if discovered or known prior to Its completion. None of the items are for replaced work. .. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 18. � N f ,. Typical Existing Berm Walkway ENG/Pl/25:SR.1.1,-.2 EXIST, CLEAR W/07f! 24, jRe'oy"5'9 70120-14" I I Mi,V. .. I it d � I y- uri�.z acor�� I i I W4¢&4 0 .� \ yEi�yr W4LZ V �P \ r �,L r PROPOSED WALKWAY WIDENIIJG r r ���iaiT IVO. / T. 5. 1 wPIROVm 9T: D"WR DATE: R[VI9ED CN4/Vl$E ODOe CeVrrOL DRAWING NUM9£R r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER r C. 0. NO. Eighteen (18) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE September 13, 1989 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB N0. P1-"i FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEM A PLANT N 1 B N P1-26; VER F R P IMARY A IN AT PLANT N 2, JOB NO. P2-3 ; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEMS AT PLANT N . , JOB N0. P2- AND IMPROVEMENTS T GRI FACILITY "B" BILLING TUNNEL AN r DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE "A", OB N P - 4. Amount of this Change Order (Add) (gedaet) E 441,048.79 r In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. r r Job No. P2-34 The original plans for the modifications to the existing primary clarifiers at .. Plant No. 2 contained details for the installation of handrails and for the construction of small concrete beams to support them. However, the width of existing walkways and the minimum clear walkway widths required by Title 8 of the California Administrative Code was not addressed; in fact, the existing walkways are too narrow. In most instances where the original details were considered for construction and for the placement of handrail , clear walkway widths would have been reduced to 14 inches due to new launder cover overhang ,r and existing walkway widths of 18 to 20 inches. The California Administrative Code requires a minimum clear and unobstructed walkway of 24 inches. During the early stages of construction this condition was recognized by the Districts Safety Coordinator and Safety Consultant and the non-conformance to Article 4, Section 3270 of Title 8 of the California Administrative Code was cited. r This change order provides for the construction of new gunite walkways and berms; new launder valve access platforms; additional concrete berm retaining walls; additional structural aluminum walkways and anodized aluminum handrails to meet all applicable safety codes. Included in the net amount of this change order is a fair and reasonable credit provided by the Contractor for walkway r work shown in the original plans and deleted by this change order. r r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 r P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 r CHANGE ORDER �+ C. 0. NO. Eighteen CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE September 13, 1989 Zurn Constructors, Inc. r JOB: LOVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-25; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-26; COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-32; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEMS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-33; AND IMPROVEMENTS TO GRIT FACILITY "B", BILLINGS TUNNEL AND DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE "A", JOB NO. P2-34. r Summary of Costs - Basin Pairs r Primary Sedimentation Basins H & I S 87,757.19 Primary Sedimentation Basins J & K 110,187.77 Primary Sedimentation Basins L & M 82,872.58 Primary Sedimentation Basins N & 0 81,593.81 r Primary Sedimentation Basins P & 0 78,637.44 TOTAL - S 441,048.79 r All walkways modification work is to be performed on a lump sum basis pursuant r to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $441,048.79 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 30 Calendar Days r TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $441,048.79 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 30 Calendar Days The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any revisions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change r Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses have been or will be incurred by the Contractor. r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eighteen (18) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE September 13, 1989 urn onstructors, Inc. r JOB: COVERS FOR PRIMARY BASINS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB N0. PI-25• FOUL AIR SCRUBBER SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1- 6; OVER F R PR MARY BAbINb AT PLANT . 21 JOB NO. P2-32; FOUL AIR SCRUBBER Y TEM AT PLAN N . , J B N . P - ; AND IMPR VEMENTS 1U bi(il FA ILI TY "B" BILLINGS TUNNEL AND DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE "A", J B NO. P - 4. r SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date November 24, 1987 Original Contract Time 540 Calendar Days Original Completion Date May 16, 1989 r Time Extension This C.O. 30 Calendar Days Total Time Extension 151 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 691 Calendar Days Revised Completion Date October 14, 1989 -� Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable r Original Contract Price E 15 893 393.00 Prev. Auth. Changes E 4 4 r This Change (Add) (BeAua•E) E 441, 4 . Amended Contract Price $ I—,47T.M r Board Authorization Date: September 13. 1989 ` COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: r Construction Manager Date ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF r ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ACCEPTED BY: APPROVED BY: r Contractor Date Director of Engineering Date r r r RESOLUTION NO. 90-8 r ACCEPTING JOB NOS. P1-25 P1-26 P2-32 P2-3 AND P2- 4 AS MPLE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NOS. P1-25, P1-26, P2-32, P2-33 r AND P2-34 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT Y ! R 1 ■ 1t f 'R 1 R k • t Y t ■ The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, r 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: r Section 1. That the contractor, Advanco Constructors, Inc. , has completed r the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant r No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit ` Facility "B", Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A", Job No. P2-34, on December 28, 1989; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Jab No. P1-25; r Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins r; at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility "B", Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A", Job No. P2-34, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated November 24, 1987; r and, r Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Advanco Constructors, r Inc. , setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, r Job No. P1-26; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility "B", Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure "A", Job No. P2-34, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 14, 1990. r r r r STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) r I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 90-8 was r passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Boards on the 14th day of r February, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Margaret M. Arnold, Wes Bannister, Roland E. Sigonger, r A. B. "Buck" Catlin, John C. Cox, Jr. , Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Beth Graham, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Evelyn Hart, Ursula E. Kennedy, William 0. Mahoney, Tom Mays, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Arthur G. Newton, Bob Perry, Iry Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard T. Polis, Don R. Roth, Phil Sansone, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Don E. Smith, Roger R. Stanton. Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, Paul Verellen, James A. Wahner, Henry W. Wedaa, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Sally Anne Sheridan, Wayne Silzel IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 1 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, this 14th day of February, 1990. r .. ita�ecreta Boards of Directors, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California r r r RESOLUTION NO. 90-100 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO AGREEMENT WITH MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. RE—DESIGN OF JOBS NOS. P1- 5, P1-26, P -32, P2-33 AND P2-34 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 4 TO AGREEMENT WITH MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RE JOBS NOS. P1-25, P1-26, P2-32, P2-33 AND P2-34, PROVIDING FOR A REALLOCATION OF COSTS .. AMONG THE CATEGORIES WITHIN SAID AGREEMENT ! ! ! ! ! t ! ! R t ! t ! ! ! ! 2 r WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. for design of Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant r No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for additional design and construction services relative to installation of covers on the primary basins, the foul air scrubbing system and modifications to Headworks B; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for additional design work to accommodate redesign of the power scrubbers and other miscellaneous work; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 provided for additional operator training on the scrubber systems; and, r WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement with Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. to provide for a reallocation of costs among the categories within said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 4 dated August 8, 1990, to that certain r agreement dated June 12, 1985, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Malcolm Pirnie, Inc., for design of Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-25; Covers for Primary Basins at Plant No. 2, - Job No. P2-32; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-26; Foul Air Scrubber System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-33; and Improvements to Grit Facility B, Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure A, Job No. P2-34, providing for .. a reallocation of costs among with categories within said agreement, is hereby approved and accepted; and, r Section 2. That said reallocation of costs shall be as follows and shall .+ not change the maximum authorized compensation of $892,708.00: Existing Change per Amended - - Agreement Addendum No. 4 Agreement Professional Services (hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 161%), not to exceed ........... $742,560.00 $4,622.00 $747,182.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed ............ 75,885.00 (4,622.00) 71,263.00 Fixed Profit .............. 74,263.00 -0- 74,263.00 .. TOTAL COMPENSATION AUTHORIZED, per Agreement and Addenda Nos. 1 through 4, inclusive .............. $892,708.00 -0- $892,708.00 r Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for ,d itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 4 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 8, 1990. •I r STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 14 of Orange County, r California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 90-100 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Boards on the 8th day of August, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: r AYES: Edward L. Allen, Margaret M. Arnold, Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Beth Graham, Peter Green, Dan R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Barry Hammond, Evelyn Hart, Frank Laszlo, William D. Mahoney, Robert H. Main, Tom Mays, James Neal , Arthur G. Newton, Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard T. Polis, Leslie A. Pontious, Charles E. Puckett, Don R. Roth, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Wayne Silzel , Roger R. Stanton, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, - . James A. Wahner, Henry W. Medea, Grace H. Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: A. B. "Buck" Catlin, Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickier, Phil r Sansone, Don E. Smith, Wayne D. Wedin IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official r seal of County Sanitation District No. 1 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 14 of Orange County, California, this 8th day - of August, 1990. r .. Rita J. retar Boards of Directors, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 14 of Orange County, California r r August 12, 1992 August 10, 1992. Staff believes it would be in the Districts' best interests to extend the contract through December 1992. - Mr. Kordick is currently working on the $21 million In rplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor project, Jab No. I-9, which includes a construction of a 120-inch diameter wastewater line between Plants 1 and . This project needs close coordination with the County of Orange and th orps of Engineers since it is being constructed within Districts' right- -way on the westerly Santa Ana River levee. The have two large projects als under construction, as part of the improvements to the Santa Ana River flood control channel , both in the $40 million range. All of the projects imp t each other. Mr. Kordick, who has over 50 years of experience as an u rground construction contractor and inspector, is working between 30 d 35 hours per week at a rate of $42.50 per hour for hours worked. Staff reconnends at the Directors adopt a resolution approving Addendum No. 2 to the rofessional Services Agreement with Martin Kordick, Sr. , extending the cant ct through December 31, 1992, which will allow the Districts to utilize Mr. rdick's construction management services for most of the remaining wo on the Interplant project. There is no change in the hourly rate. A py of of the resolution is attached with the supporting agenda s, docume s. 9(n): AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND NEGOTIATE A PROFESSIONAL ERVI E AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING ERVICES FOR REHABILITATION OF LAR FIER AND 5 AT LANT N0. 1 JOB N0. P1-41 DREHABILITATION RIF ER A HR GH A P NT N J . PZ-4 . Rehabilitation and correction of deficiencies are needed on all older primary clarifiers at the two treatment plants and the time is right for accomplishing this work. As the Directors are aware, in the last couple of months 60 million gallons per day of new primary clarifier treatment facilities have been completed and placed in service at Reclamation Plant No. 1 (Job No. P1-33). The addition of this primary treatment capacity will now allow staff to take the older clarifiers, some of which date to 1954, out of service for the needed rehabilitation work described below. In 1987 and 1988, the Districts W installed the most extensive odor control facilities in the western United States. Those facilities have been extremely successful , and have virtually eliminated odor complaints. Prior to the installation of the odor control dames and covers on the primary clarifiers, some maintenance and rehabilitation was done on the then existing twenty clarifiers. Included in this work was the coating of ferrous metal surfaces to protect them once the covers were Installed. This work was completed between 1984 and 1987. The needed rehabilitation includes improvements to nearly all facets of the primary clarifiers. The cost estimate is $10 million with the largest single item, seismic retrofit, estimated at $4 million. This work, concentrated on the 17 clarifiers at Plant No. 2, includes soils stabilization to prevent liquifaction during an earthquake. The Directors will recall that a contract -12- August 12, 1992 for seismic investigation of facilities at both plants was awarded to Dames 8 Moore in October 1990. That study found soil stabilization to be the most cost effective and least disruptive way to upgrade the structural stability of the primary clarifiers to withstandmajor earthquakes. The center columns of the clarifiers include baffles which distribute the Incoming raw wastewater evenly and assure slow velocities in the settling -- basins. These also need to be recoated or, alternatively, if economically feasible, replaced with lighter fiberglass baffles. (The fiberglass baffles would eliminate the need for future coating and reduce the weight which will aid in earthquake stability). The °beaches", which remove the scum, are also in need of repair and modification. Some of these are well over 25 years old. m Also included in the project is the coating of various ferrous metal surfaces for which the original coatings are failing. Nearly all of the corrosion is minor to date; however, it is clear that the polyurethane coatings installed between 1984 and 1987 and additional coating applied when the domes were Installed will not last and that they need to be replaced. This work is estimated at $2,950,000. Various other miscellaneous ferrous appurtenances within the domes will need to be recoated or replaced with non-ferrous material. Accelerated distress :! and corrosion have been noticed in the dome supports at the point where they connect to the clarifiers. The supports must be rebuilt including more corrosion resistant provisions which will prevent further deterioration. Separately, counsel and an independent consultant are investigating whether or not the contractor or designer made errors in the original installation of the domes for which cost reimbursement could be sought. This portion of the project Is estimated to cost about $500,000. The Directors may recall that about four years ago failures of certain underground concrete piping occurred. This pipe delivers the raw wastewater to the basins and removes the primary treated water from the basins. When -� originally installed, the concrete piping did not include a protective liner because it was not a standard procedure then. While the rehabilitation work is being done on the clarifiers, this project will include the installation of liners on pipes which have not suffered severe corrosion and/or the replacement of pipe with lined concrete pipe if corrosion is found to be severe. The pipes will be inspected as part of the design process to determine the exact condition and the necessary work will be included in the construction contract. This work Is estimated at $350,000. - The work will also include replacement of worn valves and pumps, ^� seventeen sulfide monitors, modification to scum collection equipment, and electrical system upgrades to meet the latest National Fire Protection Association recommendations. This cost is estimated at $2.2 million. Other work associated with the clarifiers already under design in separate miscellaneous improvements projects, including the seismic retrofit of mechanical systems, will be bid in the same construction contract. This work, already approved by the Directors, will be identified separately. The estimated cost of the rehabilitation work now recommended is summarized below: -13- fa Predesign Memorandum 2B Ll CORROSION - DOME AND NON-STRUCTURAL Ll �� This memorandum addresses the corrosion of the clarifier aluminum dome supports and bracing in the launder area, aluminum dome members, and non-structural items inside the clarifier domes. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Aluminum Dome Supports and Bracing The aluminum dome supports, cross bracing, and other horizontal members are severely corroded due to the corrosive atmosphere and bi-metallic coupling of aluminum with stainless steel in the launder area. All aluminum members in the launder areas should be replaced with U 316L stainless steel members, using stainless steel bolts. Any connection of the stainless steel members and bolts with existing aluminum should be Insulated with appropriate plastic insulation. The replacement of all aluminum members with stainless steel members in the launder area is estimated to cost $1,445.000 for all dari8ers. Aluminum Dome Structure Inside the Clarifiers The uncoated aluminum dome members Inside the clarifiers have developed a surface oxide film. This oxide film development is common in uncoated aluminum surfaces. It adheres to the aluminum surface and protects It from further corrosion. Although the aluminum appears luto be in fair condition, in a few years this film may become loose due to the atmosphere inside the clarifiers and allow further corrosion of aluminum. The estimated construction cost of lucoating the aluminum is approximately$1.870,000 for all clarifiers. luThe possibility of stray electrical current produced by electrical grounding system corroding the aluminum dome structure was evaluated. The corrosion observed at the clarifiers does not appear to be caused by stray current. lu 5/12/93 2B-I IQ i]] DMCIwBVRelu4MD Non-Structural Items Several non-structural Items, which were not included In the scope of this study, were observed to be corroding Inside the clarifiers. The existing condition of these items Is presented in the next section. Non-structural items include pipes, handrall, ducts, equipment housings, doors, electrical switches, and light fixtures. EXISTING FACILITIES Aluminum Dome Supports and Bracing Inside the launder areas of all clarifiers there are 48 short aluminum column supports and several aluminum bracing members. Figure 2B-1 shows a typical column support In the launder area. The aluminum columns and bracing members are connected to stainless steel brackets with stainless steel bolts, as shown in Figure 2B-2. The brackets are attached to the concrete launder walls with stainless steel thru bolts. Other aluminum horizontal structural members connect the columns to the perimeter walls. These horizontal members are shown in Figure 2B-3. The aluminum used in the launder area is identified as"alloy 7075" and stainless steel as"grade 316" tram a laboratory report. The foul air inside the dome Is withdrawn from the launder areas and taken to the foul air scrubbers. In addition, the turbulence in the water, as it goes over the weirs into the launder, produces concentrated foul air In the launder area. These two conditions create a more severely corrosive environment inside the launder area than inside the dome. The aluminum columns, aluminum cross bracing members, and other aluminum horizontal members in the launder area have suffered severe attack from the corrosive environment. Adding to the corrosive environment attack is the aluminum bi-metallic coupling to the stainless steel brackets, which cause the aluminum to become a sacrificial anode. providing galvanic protection to the stainless steel, thus accelerating deterioration of the aluminum. Figures 2B-1 Ijthrough 2B-4 show corrosion of various aluminum members in the launder area. Aluminum Dome Structure Inside the Clarifiers I The inside of the dome consists of uncoated aluminum I beams together with anodized ■ ■ aluminum panels that span the beams. The aluminum used for the beams is Identified as "alloy 6061" from a laboratory report. The uncoated aluminum structural members have 5/12/93 213-2 f]iB DM CWN MF MO La LIdeveloped a surface oxide film. This oxide film development is common in uncoated aluminum surfaces. it adheres to the aluminum surface and protects it from further corrosion. Different film thicknesses were observed on the interior of the domes. Figures 2B-5 and 2B-6 show the aluminum dome structure inside the clarifiers. The possibility of stray electrical current produced by electrical grounding system corroding the aluminum dome structure was evaluated. Corrosion damage of this type is generally limited to localized areas, and is generally serious and recognizable by the type of pitting that occurs on the metal surface. This type of corrosion usually occurs when the metal is submerged or buried in ground thus providing a conductive path through which current may enter or leave the metallic structure. The corrosion observed at the clarifier domes does not appear to be caused by stray current activities, but is a result of the corrosive atmosphere inside the domes as previously mentioned. Pipes l ■ The ductile iron plant water and overhead lines run the length of the bridges and are supported i� from the bridges with various types of support. Pipe coating has failed at various places. At several locations where the bare piping system is exposed to the corrosive atmosphere of the lu clarifier. corrosion has resulted in deep pitting of the pipe. UHandrail UFour types of handrail systems are used on the equipment platforms at the end of the access bridges. These are steel handrail with polyurethane coating, aluminum handrail with Upolyurethane coating, anodized aluminum handrail, and stainless steel handrail. The first two systems, polyurethane coated handrails, are in poor condition with disbonded coating and corroded metal at several locations. The anodized aluminum handrail appeared to be in fair condition with local oxide films. The stainless steel handrail is in good condition with some local breakdown of passive protective film. This damage is caused by the oxygen differential cells beneath the dirt or debris. L Air Supply Ducts ILThe stainless steel air supply ducts appeared to be in good condition. The ducts have some local stains and rust spots. The rusting probably has resulted from the heavy condensation Ldue to the temperature difference between the interior and exterior of the ducts. 5/12/93 2B-9 n99ewnM twNux.lunmo r January 12, 1994 r ' The above described changes would have been ' uded in the original design if discovered or known in the design phas the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change rs to date on this contract will be $706.00 with 26 calendar days Tim Tension. This represents an increase of 0.003% over the original co amount. Staff r mends approval of Change Order No. 2 for a net deduction of 55,979.E m the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. There is no time ext on associated with the change order. r _ 9(g): RECEIVE AND FILE PROJECT REPORT AND SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT 'r WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS 3. 4 AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1 . JOB NO P7-41 . AND REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIERS D THROUGH O AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO, P2-48. In February 1993, the Directors awarded a professional services agreement to John Carollo Engineers for the preparation of a Project Report to rehabilitate all of the Districts' circular primary clarifiers. Similar work must be done periodically and was previously accomplished on these basins prior to 1985. All of the circular clarifiers are covered with domes to collect foul air produced in the basins, the most extensive odor control retrofit of its kind in the western United States. The facilities have been very successful; however, since the domes were installed, corrosion of the domes and clarifier mechanisms has accelerated in the enclosed atmosphere. This project will correct these problems as well as operational problems noted during the last several years. In addition, upgrades to meet current code requirements will be included as will certain -� structural modifications for seismic purposes. The Project Report examined the clarifiers and made recommendations for their rehabilitation. The preliminary cost estimate for the rehabilitation is approximately $8 million, which is consistent with past estimates. However, the recommendations in the Project Report are somewhat different than originally "J contemplated when project authorization was secured. For instance, early estimates were based on recoating ferrous metal components, such as the bridges between the outer wall and the center clarifier mechanism. The Project Report recommends replacement with fiberglass bridges. The consulting engineer believes that no coating system is available with a sufficient life to be truly cost and operationally efficient, and a present worth analysis indicates a fiberglass bridge will best serve the Districts for the long term. -7- r r r r r r Central Power Generation Engines r r r r RESOLUTION NO. 90-16 ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-15 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-15 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT d The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, ti DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Advanco Constructors, Inc. , has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, on February 2, 1990; and. Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Ocean Outfall Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the r contract therefor, dated July 20, 1987; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Advanco Constructors, Inc. , setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Ocean Outfall d Booster Station "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-15, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 14, 1990. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I , RITA J. BROWN, Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 90-16 was passed and adapted at a regular meeting of said Boards on the 14th day of March, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Wes Bannister, Roland E. Bigonger, A. B. "Buck" Catlin, Jahn C. Cox, Jr. , Norman E. Culver, Richard B. Edgar, Beth Graham, >, Don R. Griffin, Dan Griset, Evelyn Hart, Ursula E. Kennedy, William D. Mahoney, Tom Mays, James Neal , Carrey J. Nelson, Bob Perry, Iry Pickler, Ruthelyn Plummer, Richard T. Polis, Phil Sansone, J. R. "Bob" Siefen, Wayne Silzel , Don E. Smith, Roger R. Stanton, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, Paul Verellen, James A. Wahner, Henry W. Wedaa, Edna Wilson, Grace H. Winchell NOES: None ABSENT: Margaret M. Arnold, Arthur G. Newton, Sally Anne Sheridan IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 1 on behalf of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, this 14th day of March, 1990. Rita J. Bro , Secretary Boards of Directors, County „ Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, - California January 9, 1991 ,r 9(h): AUTHORIZING THE SELECTION'COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 7 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WIT BROWN AND ALDWELL NSULT N NNUFREER� T�hblbN 6€LN AL FuWtRR GEf7EQAlZORS45TERf�,Job G - . Job No. J-19; Central Power Generation Systems, was awarded to Brawn and Caldwell Consulting Engineers in July 1986. The original contract provided support for project development and securing a Permit to Construct these facilities at bath treatment plants from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The Central Power Generation Systems will utilize the Districts' digester gas, a byproduct of the sewage treatment process, to fuel a, internal combustion engines which in turn will drive generators and produce power to operate the treatment plants. Both the Plant No. 1 and the Plant No. 2 systems are now under construction. When completed in 1992, the Districts will be self sufficient for power. The award of the construction contracts and the anticipated need for supporting construction services by the consulting engineer was originally - planned on a schedule which has substantially changed. First, as the Directors are well aware, the project took considerably longer than planned to obtain a permit from SCAQMD. In our planning we had originally allowed one year for the permitting process. However, it took over two years to obtain the SCAQMD permits. In addition, the second construction contract for the Fountain Valley generating plant was delayed pending implementation of the capital facilities debt financing program. Under this program the initial issuance of certificates of participation in the amount of $100,000,000 was recently concluded. Several major treatment plant expansion projects that have also been delayed for funding are now anticipated to be awarded and constructed in the same time frame; therefore, staff believes additional support from the designer will be necessary, especially for coordination between the various concurrent construction projects. Staff, therefore, recommends that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate with the designer, Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers, to provide additional construction support services over and above that previously authorized. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the agreement will be presented to the Joint Boards for consideration. 9(1): AUTHORIZING EMPLOYMENT OF CONTROL SYSTEMS ENGINEER AT TOP OF ENGINEER ,e POSITION SALARY RANGE. - The Districts are currently in the midst of the largest facilities construction program in their history and many of the projects include upgrading the instrumentation and control systems at the treatment plants. Accordingly, additional professional engineering assistance is needed to design, review the design of consulting firms, and to help manage the installation and operation of these sophisticated systems. Because this is a very specialized field, we have been searching for a staff engineer with this expertise to help fill our needs for some time. -7- e. , COUNTY SANIT._AION DISTRICTS OF •:: . nnn ORANGE COUNTY CALIFORNIA FAX TRANSMITTAL FORM DATE: 6/I8/92 APPROXIMATE TIME: 1 :30 p.m. TO: Tom Woodruff and John Shaw ORG: Rourke 6 Woodruff FAX NO.:( ) TO: ORG: FAX NO.:( ) TO: ORG: FAX NO.:( ) TO: ORG: FAX NO.:( ) '. Total number of pages being transmitted(Including this transmittal forth): 6 SUBJECT: J- 19-2, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 2 PRIORITY: ® urgent ❑ Per Your Request ❑ FYI ❑ Per Our Conversafion ❑ Other Reply Needed: ® Yes ❑ No Original will be forwarded via: ❑ U.S. Mali ❑ Air Express ❑ Messenger 0 Original will not be forwarded SPECIALNOTES: Please advise what action we should take regarding the separate $10 in policy that is being cancelled as of July I (?). This job requires $10m/occurrence and $10m/aggregate separate for this project. Brinderson supplied us with the policy from St. Paul/Seaboard for the $10, senarete Fnr this p_jenr. naming : np liryhnldc Also, Builders ' all risk was not renewed Per Tom Dawes ' memo dated 5/II /92 to Tom Woodruf FROM; Penny Kyle Ext 2026 Transmitting Operator. Ext NOTE H you encounter any difficulty In receiving the total number of pages indicated above, PLEASE CALL BACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AT(714)962-2411 AND ASK FOR THE TRANSMITTING OPERATOR. CSDOC DEPARTMENT FAX NUMBERS FOR REPLY: ❑ Administration . . . . . . . . . . . (714)962-0356 ❑ Control Center-Plant 1 . . . . . . . (714)965.6777 ❑ Personnel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714)962-0427 ❑ Control Center-Plant 2 . . . . . . . (714)968-2330 ❑ Finance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714)962-3954 ❑ Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714)962-5018 ._ ❑ Purchasing . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714)965-0728 ❑ Constr. Mgmt-Plant 1 . . . . . . . . (714)964-4775 ❑ Oper. &Mnlce . . . . . . . . . . . (714)962.8379 ❑ Constr.Mgmt-Plant 2 . . . . . . . . (714)9652156 ❑ Technical Services (Source ControVOompliance/Laboratory/Conservation• Recycle& Reuse) (.•j 1 P.O.Bm BIZ/ -' F=uain Valley.CA 927 4127 ��y Takph.c:(714)962-2411 St Pool/S.alp,und F `'rf GLt Susumu 199pp rtacpnnurBculevar0.Ame 600 In+ne Cautorma 92715 2445 _. 71.2511911 Fa.71:8519627 NOTICE OF NON—RENEWAL April 10, 1992 v / County Sanitation District w of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain valley, CA 92728-8127 w RE: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY BRINDERSON CORPORATION / POLICY NO. 209224-90 +s SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY Dear Gentlemen: Please take notice that Seaboard Surety Company elects not to renew the undermentioned policy in accordance with its terms and conditions. Non-Renewal to be effective as n�indicated below. BOND/POLICY NO. : OCP 209224-90 ,yn u AMOUNT: $10,000,000/10,000,000 CSL PRINCIPAL: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ADDRESS: 22212 Brookhurst Avenue Huntington Beach, CA EXPIRATION DATE: July 1, 1992 RIND OF BOND/POLICY: OWNERS i CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE LIABILITY 'w Non-Renewal to be effective July 1, 1992 SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY ~ By: Charles ay ATTORNEY-I -FACT v r Seaboard Surety Company St Paul Fire and Mime Insurance Company St Paul Mercury Insurance Company r St Paul Guardoolnswance Comsa , SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY ,a ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES: BEDMINSTER, NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF RE-INSTATEMENT p February 20, 1992 ti County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 RE: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY BRINDERSON CORPORATION / POLICY NO. OCP 209224-90 Gentlemen: Please take notice that this company elects to Re-instate the undermentioned bond/policy in accordance with its terms and conditions. Re-instatement to be effective as indicated below. BOND/POLICY NO. : OCP 209224-90 AMOUNT: $ 10,000,000/$10,000, 000 CSL PRINCIPAL: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ADDRESS: 22212 Brookhurst Avenue Huntington Beach, CA KIND OF BOND/POLICY: OWNERS & CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE p Re-instatement to be effective April 1, 1992. SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY d B_v: Charles L. Day ATTORNEY-IN-FACT SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY r .. Ce.vai A:e L. Uni r \Lnm.n NOTICE OF NON-RENEWAL w January 27, 1992 ti County Sanitation Districts r of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 d RE: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY BRINDERSON CORPORATION / POLICY NO. OCP 209224-90 Dear Gentlemen: y Please take notice that seaboard Surety Company elects not to renew the undermentioned policy in accordance with its terms and conditions. Non-Renewal to be effective as indicated below. . POLICY NO. : OCP 209224-90 AMOUNT: $10,000,000/$10,000, 000 CSL PRINCIPAL: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County ADDRESS: 22212 Brookhurst Avenue Huntington Beach, CA EXPIRATION DATE: April 1, 1992. a RIND OF POLICY: OWNERS & CONTRACTORS PROTECTIVE r Non-Renewal to be effective April 1, 1992 SEABOARD SURETY COMPANY r e^ By: - CharleV L. Day ATTO Y-IN-FACT a w W' 19700 FAIRCHILD. IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 92715 714-851-1911 DooparBessnmer Benoro ng Prooucts Division ' 0 L.mmn Avenue +, Grove cd, cq 1612, '998 =+2-58 8000 r / COOPER August 4, 1992 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Attention: Mr. Tod Haynes Subject: Orange County Job #J-19-A w C-B SO-1127 Reference: Your Request to Review the Astro Pak Pickling Procedure k Dear Mr. Haynes: 1.0 In discussing your request for comments on the Astro Pak pickling procedure for the lube oil system at Plant #1, with Victor Gharakhanian, we were informed that Orange County has decided to leave the oil system configuration at Plant #1 in its present form, which is not per the configuration shown on Cooper-Bessemer Lube Oil Schematic LSVB-46-33 for Plant #1 (LSVB-46.32 for Plant #2). Apparently, the existing tube oil systems in both Plant #1 and Plant #2 are similarly configured, and have been constructed per a lube oil system design which differs substantially from the configuration submitted by Cooper. 2.0 The lube oil system recommended by Cooper is based on years of experience in manufacturing and installing engines and the location of the filter and strainer needs to be strategically located to prevent the influx of dirt and foreign liquids into the engine lube oil system during operation, but especially during the initial starting procedure. w w Page One of Three N Page Two of Three Mr. Tod Haynes August 4, 1992 3.0 Orange County has configured its lube systems so that they are incapable of providing proper lubrication for Cooper engines. The five (5) engines at Plant #2 (C-B SO-1064), have already experienced a substantial failure after operating with the existing lube oil system configuration there. Because of this we must advise you that Cooper will accept no responsibility for engine failure, deterioration or other damage associated with lubrication deficiencies. 4.0 This action is based on paragraph 4C of the Cooper Terms and Conditions, Form C100, Rev. 9-85, which is referenced in paragraph 2.10.2 of the purchase contract. As a result, Orange County will be responsible for parts and labor on any failed engine c components affected by the existing lube oil system. You should also note, that, to the extent the failure to provide an adequate lubrication system contributes to the premature wear or failure of any parts, we will not assume responsibility for the replacement of such items under the Maintenance Agreement. d 5.0 We are reviewing the Astro Pak Pickling Procedure. Any comments made by Cooper will be strictly advisory and will be made as an accommodation to Orange County and Hunter Construction Corp. We make no guarantee with regard to the accuracy or completeness of the comments provided and Orange County and ,r Hunter will be solely responsible for the proper cleaning of the lube oil system piping. L4 6.0 As stated in my 7/30/92 FAX, we should have our review and comments completed early next week and we will submit our comments through Victor Gharakhanian at that time. T If you have any questions, or if you want to discuss this letter, please let me know. Nc Sincerely, 41 G: K. Elefterlou, Senior Project Engineer Project Engineering Department w GKE:mIs r f' ` Page Three of Three Mr. Tod Haynes August 4, 1992 Copy: Orange County s Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Engineering James R. Harris, Project Manager Edwin E. Hodges, Asst. Director of Maintenance C000edCA Victor Gharakhanian Charles K. Honsberger Dean Manning Cooper Bessemer Reciprocating Alan M. Burdette Terry W. Kearns Michael E. Marks Paul J. Seymour v a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA r � � P.O.BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962.2411 May 26, 1993 r In the OFica ohthe Secretary a County Sanitation DuArict(s) No(s) Boards of Directors JUN� 09� 1993 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County By 10844 Ellis Avenue r Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 9 to Professional Services Agreement r with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engneers for Professional Engineering Services in Connection with Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for Addendum No. 9 to the Professional Services Agreement for professional engineering services in r connection with Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for a reallocation of funds, on an hourly-rate basis, including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $4,471,136.00. Existing Change per Amended Acreement Addn. No. 9 Agreement r Engineering Services, (direct labor at hourly rates, plus overhead at 175%), ,r not to exceed $3,488,820 5 (36,503) $3,452,327 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 418,777 36,503 455,280 " Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 162,700 0 162,700 r Fixed Profit 400,839 _ 0 400,839 TOTAL AMENDED CONTRACT, r not to exceed 64.471.138 1_2 44.471.138 r r KMay COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA of Directors 108<A ELUS AVENUE 6, 1993 Pa.eox 8127 Page Two FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 r n141982.2411 r The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the r services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. r � William Mahoney EVelyn Ha .. Chairmen Vice Joint Chairman Selection Commnjsk Selection Committee r A. B. Catlin Don�in Past Joint Chairman Past Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering _ r Selection Committee r r r r r r r RESOLUTION NO. 93-61 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 9 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR OF JOB NO. J-19 .e A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 , 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 9 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS, JOB NO. J-19, PROVIDING FOR A REALLOCATION OF COSTS AMONG CATEGORIES WITHIN SAID AGREEMENT +ttttt+++++ttt++++t++++t+++++++tt+ WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for preliminary design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19 (subsequently divided into Job Nos. J-19-1 and J-19-2) ; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for additional services necessary relative to application and processing of a Permit to Construct from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) ; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for additional services required for background NOx and health risk assessment modeling information required by SCAQMD; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to said agreement provided for ` phased final design of said project; Phase I work to commence immediately for electrical system configuration studies, digester 1 " gas system modifications and ongoing South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) permitting interface, and Phase II .. work for final design, construction and training services to commence upon receipt of a permit to construct from SCAQMD; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 4 to said agreement provided for design of a steam turbine system to be incorporated into the project to take advantage of engine heat to produce additional electricity; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 5 to said agreement provided for design of digester hot water loop replacement for the system's m heat removal at both plants; design modifications to gas system at Digesters A and B; and design of backup cooling water source for the new ocean outfall Booster Station at Plant No. 2; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 6 to said agreement provided for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 7 to said agreement provided for additional construction support services; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 8 to said agreement provided for additional inspection and design services; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said agreement to provide for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the total maximum authorized compensation; and, .. 2 WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation - Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 9 dated June 9, 1993, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated July 9, 1986, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and -- Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers, for design of Central r Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for a reallocation of costs among the categories within said agreement, with no change in the total maximum authorized compensation, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said reallocation of costs shall be as r follows and shall not change the maximum authorized compensation of $4,471, 136.00: 3 r r Existino Agreement Addendum Amended r, As Amended No. 9 Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 175%, not to exceed $3,488,820.00 J$36,503.00) $3,452,327.00 Direct Expenses, not r to exceed 418,777.00 36,503.00 455,280.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 162,700.00 0.00 162,700.00 r Fixed Profit 400,839.00 QM 400,839.00 TOTAL, not to exceed 84.471.136.00 Soo00 44.471.136.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District r No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, r 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 9 in form approved by the General r Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. r 1PADIlaf1 r V b r 4 r STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. - COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, PENNY KYLE, Assistant Secretary of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2 , 3 , 5, 6, 7, .e 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 93-61 was passed and adopted at - a regular meeting of said Boards on the 9th day of June, 1993, by 4 the following vote, to wit: .. AYES: Fred Barrera, Bob Bell, Buck Catlin, John Collins, John C. Cox, Jr. , Jan Debay, Burnie Dunlap, James Evans, James Ferryman, James Flora, Don R. Griffin, John M. Gullixson, Barry Hammond, Evelyn - Hart, Gail Kerry, Victor Leipzig, Thomas E. Lutz, William D. Mahoney, Eva G. Miner, Maria Moreno, Ted Moreno, Carrey J. Nelson, Glenn Parker, Leslie Pontious, Charles E. Puckett, Robert Richardson, Phil Sansone, Sal Sapien, Jim Silva, Sheldon S. Singer, William G. Steiner, Peer A. Swan, Charles E. Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Henry Wedaa, Grace H. Winchell, George L. Zlaket y NOES: None ABSENT: Frank Laszlo, Iry Pickler „d IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed - the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 1 on behalf "tl of itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, this 9th day of June, 1993 . P nny Kyle s9iffant Secretary Boards of rect s, county Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California r VITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .1T"UL, DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York CASE NUMBER corporation PLA IIJT IFFI51 CJ- 93-3697 RSWL (JRx) .a v5. THE BRINDERSON CORPORATION, a California S U M M O N S corporation, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ON AMENDED COMPLAINT r ORANGE COUNTY, a special government district, DEFENDANT(S) TO THE ABOr-NAMED DEFENDANT(S) , You are hereby summoned and required tc serve upon TIMOTHY M. THORNTON, JR. r, A Member of Nelsen, Thompson, Pegue d Thornton A Professional Corporation it Plaintiff's attorney, whose address is: r' 2425 Olympic Blvd. , Suite 4000W Santa Monica, California 90404 r en answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you within20 days '+ after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. OCT r DATA: '�I.ERK U.S. O$TICf COURT .. GRACE KAESI c� By Deputy Clerk `r (SEAL OF THE COURT) �N r S U M M O N S i -iA a.i PROOF OF S'_..:ICE OF SUMMONS 3ND COMPLAINT CIVIL r T certify that I am authorized to serve the summons and complaint in the within action pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 4(c) and chat I served the summons and complaint as follows: r - (TYPE OR PRINT) ;a=e and title of person served: - - ?. ?erson with whom left: Title or relationship co person served: r 3. Dace and tine of delivery: r N.ailiag date; class of mail: ?lace of mailing: - 3. Address, City and State: ( ) Home ( ) Business m 6. Manner of service, (Check applicable box and complete separate proof or - service for each defendant served.) PERSONAL SERVICE - ['j PERSONAL SERVICE, by banding copies to the person served (F.R.Civ.P. 4(d) ; . r UPON A STAIE OR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OR OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION THEREOF SUBJECT TO SUIT, C.C.P. 415.30 (a); F.R.Civ.P. 4(d) (6) , by delivering - a copy of the summons and complaint to the chief executive officer thereof or by serviag the summons and complaint in a manner prescribed by law of I=: state for the service of summons or other like process neon .,Ay such defendant. r SERVICE ON U.S. DEFENDANTS - - ❑ UPON THE UNITED STATES OR AN OFFICER OR AGENCY OF THE UNITED STATES, by r serv'_ng in a manner as prescribed by Rule 4(d) (4) and (5) , F.R.Civ.P. SERVICE BY MAIL (Non U.S. Defendants) �+ MAIL ;:,D AC:LNOG'LEOGXENT SERVICE, C.C.?. 415.30: F.R.Civ.P. 4(d) (ii) . 3y mailing (by first-class mail or airmail) copies to the person served, together with two copies of the fora of notice and acknowledgment and a r return envelope, postage prepaid, addressed to the sender. (ATTACH VRITTEN ACS`JO.'LEDGMMT OF RECEIPT OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT.) NOTE: The service by mail provision does not anoly to service upon the r United States or an officer or agency of the United States, but applies only cc service upon a defendant of any class tefarred to in Rules �(d) (1) and (3) F.R.Ci•+.P. r r CV-13 (-;?-) Conciiued an Reverse r 1 '; TIMOTHY M. THORNTON, JR. , #106413 NELSEN, THOMPSON, PEGUE 6 THORNTON 211 A Professional Corporation 2425 Olympic Boulevard, Suite 4000W Santa Monica, California 90404-4032 31 r� ". Telephone: (310) 315-1001 41 Attorneys for Plaintiff r 51j HOME INSURANCE COMPANY 61 A r 71 S UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT INI 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - I loll - 1111 HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a NOW ) CASE NO. CV 93-3697 RSWL (JRx) York Corporation ) 1211 ) AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR Plaintiff, ) DECLARATORY RELIEF 131 ) VS. ) (Jury Trial Demanded) 14 ) ) 15 THE BRINDERSON CORPORATION, a ) California Corporation, COUNTY ) 16 SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE ) COUNTY, a special government ) •+ 17 ! district, ) 1811 Defendants. ) r ) 19 !1 2011 Plaintiff, HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York 2111 corporation, for its claim for relief alleges as follows: r 221 FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF 231! (Declaratory Relief) 2411 1. Jurisdiction is founded on diversity of 25ii citizenship and the amount in controversy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 261i Section 1332 (a) , based upon the facts more specifically alleged r 2711 in paragraphs 2 through 6 below. 281: 2 . The amount in controversy exceeds $50, 000 r r 11 exclusive of interest and costs. 2 3 . Plaintiff HOME INSURANCE COMPANY ("HOME") is, and I 3 was at all times herein mentioned, a corporation duly organized 4 and existing under the laws of the State of New York, with its 5 principal place of business in New York City, New York. 6 Plaintiff is, and was at all times herein mentioned, engaged in 7 the business of insurance. Plaintiff is, and was at all times 8 herein mentioned, admitted in the State of California to r 9 transact the business of insurance. 10 4. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and on that - 11 basis alleges, that Defendant The Brinderson Corporation is 12 incorporated in the state of California, with its principal 13 place of business in the County of Orange, State of California. 14 5. At all times relevant, Defendant County 15 Sanitation Districts of Orange County was and is a special 16 governmental district existing by reason and by virtue of the 17 laws of and authority of the State of California. 18 6. Venue lies in the Central District of California d 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1391 (a) . 20 7. Brinderson entered into a construction agreement 21 with the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, under 22 which Brinderson was to build a power generation system facility 23 at District Sanitation Plant No. 2 in the City of Huntington r 24 Beach, Count of Orange, State of California. 25 8 . By letter dated July 14, 1992 from County 26 Sanitation Districts of Orange (County to Brinderson 27 � corporation, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "1" 28 and incorporated herein by this reference, the County Sanitation y i -2- I Districts of Orange County asserted a demand on Brinderson to .. 2 repair and restore certain equipment at the Huntingon Beach 3 plant. ._ 4 9. Home issued its insurance policy number r 5 GLRF385847 to named insured The Brinderson Corporation. The 6 policy period was April 1, 1992 to April 1, 1993. The policy r 7 provided commercial p general liability insurance. 8 10. HOME'S policy provides coverage for, inter alia, 9 property damage. The grant of coverage provides: r 10 Insuring Agreement - 11 a. We will pay those sums that the insured .. 12 becomes legally obligated to pay as damages 3.31 because of "bodily injury" or "property r 14 damage" to which this insurance applies. p, 15 This insurance applies to ''bodily injury" 16 and "property damage" only if: 17 (1) The "bodily injury" or "property 18 damage" is caused by an "occurrence" r 19 that takes place in the "coverage 20 territory;" and 21 (2) The "bodily injury" or "property 'r 22 damage" occurs during the policy 23 period. We will have the right and 24 duty to defend any "suit" seeking those r 25 damages. We may at our discretion 26 investigate any "occurrence" and settle 27 any claim or "suit" that may result. 28 r -3- i I 1 11. Home's policy defined the terms "property damage" r 2 and "occurrence" as follows: k+ 3 "Property damage" means: -. 4 a. Physical injury to tangible property, 0 5 including all resulting loss of use of that 6 property. All such loss shall be deemed to r 7 occur at the time of the physical injury e that caused it; or r _ 9 b. Loss of use of tangible property that is not ® 10 physically injured. All such loss shall be 11 deemed to occur at the time of the 12 "occurrence" that caused it. u 13 "Occurrence" means an accident, including _. 14 continuous or repeated exposure to substantially 15 the same general harmful conditions. 16 12. HOME'S Policy Number 5238 70 11 contains the r 17 following exclusions: 18 J . "Property damage" to a 19 (1) property you own, rent, or occupy; r 20 (2) Premises you sell, give away or abandon, if 21 the "property damage" arises out of any part r 22 of those premises; 23 (3) Property loaned to you; 24 (4) Personal property in the care, custody or r 25 control of the insured; -- 26 (5) That particular part of real property on ." 27 which you or any contractors or 28 subcontractors working directly or r -4- 1 indirectly on your behalf are performing .r 2 operations, if the "property damage" arises 3 out of those operations or ti 4 - (6) That particular part of any property that 5 must be restored, repaired or replaced 61 because "your work" was incorrectly .+ 7 performed on it. 8 Paragraph (2) of this exclusion does not apply if the P 9 premises are -'your work" and were never occupied, -� 10 rented or held for rental by you. 11 Paragraphs (3) , (4) , (5) and (6) of this exclusion do ` 12 not apply to liability assumed under a sidetrack 13 agreement. 14 Paragraph (6) of this exclusion does not apply to �1 15 "property damage" included in the "products-completed 16 operations hazard. " 17 k. "Property damage" to "your product" arising out 18 of it or any part of it. 19 1. "property damage" to "your work" arising out of 20 it or any part of it and included in the 21 "products-completed operations hazard. " 22 This exclusion does not apply if the damaged work 23 or the work out of which the damage arises was N 24 performed on your behalf by a subcontractor. 25 b. "Bodily injury" or "property damage" for 261 which the insured is obligated to pay 27 damages by reason of the assumption of 28 liability in contract or agreement. This -5- l � exclusion does not apply to liability for r 21 damages: 31 (1) Assumed in a contract or agreement that V 4 is an "insured contract" , . . . + 5 (2) That the insured would have in the 6 absence of the contract or agreement. m 7 M. "Property damage" to "impaired -property" or 8 property that has not been physically injured, r 9 arising out of: 10 (1) A defect, deficiency, inadequacy or 11 dangerous condition in "your product" I 12 or "your work; " or 13 (2) A delay or failure by you or anyone 14 acting on your behalf to perform a ki 15 contract or agreement in accordance 16 with its terms. 17 This exclusion does not apply to the loss of use 18 of other property arising out of sudden and 19 accidental physical injury to "your product" or 20 "your work" after it has been put to its intended 21 use. htl 22 n. Damages claimed for any loss, cost or expense 231 incurred by you or others for the loss of use, � I 24 withdrawal, recall, inspection, repair, r, 25 replacement, adjustment, removal or disposal of: 26I (1) "Your product;" �y 27 (2) "Your work;" or ® 281 (3) "Impaired property;" -6- 1 if such product, work, or property is withdrawn r 2 or recalled from the market or from use by any 3 person or organization because of a known or w 4 suspected defect, deficiency, inadequacy or `. 5 dangerous condition in it. 6 13 . The Home policy defined "products-completed 7 operations hazard" and "impaired property" and "your product" as 8 follows: d 9 "Products-completed operations hazard" is defined as: �y 10 a. "Products-completed operations hazard" 11 includes all "bodily injury" and "property 12 damage" occurring away from premises you own 13 or rent and arising out of "your product" or 14 "your work" except: 15 (1) Products that are still in your 16 physical possession; or ' 17 (2) Work that has not yet been completed or 18 abandoned. r- 19 b. "Your work" will be deemed completed at the 20 earliest of the following times: 21 (1) when all of the work called for in your 22 contract has been completed. 23 (2) When all of the work to be done at the w 24 site has been completed if your 25 contract calls for work at more than 26 one site. 27 (3) When that part of the work done at a 28 job site has been put to its intended r -7- i 1I use by any person or organization other r 2 than another contractor or 3 subcontractor working on the same 4 4 project. !r 5 Work that may need service, maintenance, 6 correction, repair or replacement, but which w 7 is otherwise complete, will be treated as 8 completed. r 9 C. This hazard does not include "bodily injury" r 10 or "property damage" arising out of: 11 (1) The transportation of property, unless r 12 the injury or damage arises out of a 13 condition in or on a vehicle created by r 14 the "loading or unloading" of it; 15 (2) The existence of tools, uninstalled 16 equipment or abandoned or unused 17 materials; 18 (3) Products or operations for which the r 19 classification in this Coverage part or r 20 in our manual of rules includes 21 products or completed operations. 22 "Impaired property" is defined as: 23 "Impaired property" means tangible property, 24 other than "your product" or "your work, " that a, 25 cannot be used or is less useful because of: 26 a. It incorporates "your product" or "your 27 work" that is known or thought to be 28 defective, deficient, inadequate or r _g_ r 1i dangerous; or w 2 b. You have failed to fulfill the terms of a r 31 contract or agreement; 41 if such property can be restored to use by: uW 5 a. The repair, replacement, adjustment or 6 removal of "your product" or "your work;" or r 7 b. Your fulfilling the terms of the contract or 8 agreement. r 9 "Your product" means" yo 10 a. Any goods or products, other than real ill property. manufactured, sold, handle, 12 distributed or disposed of by: 13 (1) You; .d 14 (2) others trading under your name; or r. 15 (3) A person or organization whose business 16 or assets you have acquired; and r 17 b. Containers (other than vehicles) , materials, 18 parts or equipment furnished in connection r 19I with such goods or products. �. 20 "Your product" includes: 21 a. Warranties or representations made at any 22 time with respect to the fitness, quality, 23 durability, performance or use of "your r 24 product; " and r 25 b. The providing of or failure to provide 26 warnings or instructions. r 27 "Your product" does not include vending machines or 28I other property rented to or located for the use of i -9- y I 11 others but not sold. r 2 "Your work" means: 3 a. Work or operations performed by you or on 4 your behalf; and 5 b. Materials, parts or equipment furnished in 6 connection with such work or operations. d 7 "Your work" includes: r 8 a. warranties or representations made at any 9 time with respect to the fitness, quality, r 10 durability, performance or use of "your 111 work;" and 12 b. The providing of or failure to provide r 13 warnings or instructions. 14 "Insured contract" is defined as: r 15 "Insured contract" means: 16 a. A lease of premises; r 17 b. A sidetrack agreement; 18 C. An easement or license agreement in r 19 connection with vehicle or pedestrian 20 private railroad crossings at grade; 21 d. An obligation, as required by ordinance, to r 22 indemnify a municipality, except in 23 connection with work for a municipality; 24 e. An elevator maintenance agreement; or 25 f. That part of any other contract or agreement 26 pertaining to your business' (including an r 271 indemnification of a municipality in i 281 connection with work performed for a r i r -10- r 1 municipality) under which you assume the 2 tort liability of another to pay damages r 3 because of "bodily injury" or "property 4 damage" to a third person or organization. �+ 5 Tort liability means a liability that would 6 be imposed by law in the absence of any r 7 contract or agreement. a An "insured contract" does not include that part r 9 of any contract or agreement; r 30 a. That indemnifies any person or organization 11 for "bodily injury" or "property damage" r 12 arising out of construction or demolition 13 operations, within 50 feet of any railroad r 14 property and affecting any railroad bridge r 15 or trestle, tracks, road-beds, tunnel, 16 underpass or crossing; r 17 b. That indemnifies an architect, engineer or 18 surveyor for injury or damage arising out r 19 of: ., 20 (1) Preparing, approving or failing to 21 prepare or approve maps, drawings, r 22 opinions, reports, surveys, change 23 orders, designs or specifications; or r 24 (2) giving directions or instructions, or r 25 failing to give them, if that is the 26 primary cause of the injury or damage; r 27 C. Under which the insured, if an architect, 28 engineer or surveyor, assumes liability for r r -11- i r i I an injury or damage arising out of the 2 insured's rendering or failing to render r 3 professional services, including those 4 listed in b. above and supervisory, r 5 inspection or engineering services; or 6 d. That indemnifies any person or organization r 7 for damage by fire to premises rented or 8 loaned to you. I..I 9 14. HOME is informed and believes that defendants ..+ 10 contend that HOME has an ongoing duty to defend and indemnify 11 Brinderson against the District's claim. r 12 15. HOME contends that it has no duty to defend or 13 indemnify defendants because there is no "occurrence" of .r 14 "property damage" as defined in the policy; and any property r 15 damage claimed by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange 16 County is excluded by the exclusions set forth above; and because 17 contractual liability of Brinderson is not covered by the Policy. 18 16. An actual controversy exists between the parties r 19 herein, and this Court has the authority to issue a declaratory r 20 relief judgment concerning their respective rights and duties 21 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2202. r 22 SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF 23 (Reimbursement) r 24 15. Plaintiff refers to and incorporates herein by r 25 reference paragraph 1 through 14 of the first claim for relief as 26 though fully set forth herein. r 27 16. Home Insurance, by correspondence dated September 28 8 , 1992, has advised Brinderson that it reserves the right to r -12- r r i a 1 decline to pay defense fees and costs which are allocable to r 2 uncover claims and actions, and reserves the right to recover 3 defense costs expended in Brinderson's defense should it be r 4 determined that there is no duty to defend the claim. r 5 17. Home has defended Brinderson against the claim of 6 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, and in defending 7 Brinderson has incurred fees and costs in excess of $50, 000. 00. 8 18. Home is entitled to reimbursement of all defense 9 expenses it has paid to or on behalf of Brinderson with regard to r 10 the claim of the County Sanitation Districts of orange County. 11 PRAYER ` 12 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays judgment as to all Claims 13 for Relief as follows: r 14 (1) A declaration by the Court that plaintiff HOME ,r 15 INSURANCE COMPANY has neither a duty to defend nor to indemnify 16 THE BRINDERSON CORPORATION in connection with claims against it 17 by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. 18 (2) An order of this court declaring and adjudging r 19 � that plaintiff Home Insurance Company is entitled to 20 reimbursement of all defense expenses it has paid to or on behalf 21 of Brinderson Corporation with regard to the claim of County 22 Sanitation Districts of Orange County. 23 r 24 r 25 26 27 28 r t -13- r Iu1 r 11 (3) For costs of suit herein incurred. r 29 (4) For such other and further relief as the Court 31 deems proper. r 4il DATED: October L , 1993 TIMOTHY M. THORNTON, JR. Member of NELSEN, THOMPSON, r 5 PEGDE i THORNTON A Professional Corporation 6i ` BY: 81 r TIMOTH . R iJR it Attar £orP , ff . 91 HOME RANCE ANY r 1011 119 12 I 13 r 14 r 15 II 16 � I, r 171 I 180 1911 I 201 r 21y r 22 �23 r it 241 251I r 26 2711 280 r -14- r i r 1 r DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 2 3 Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury of all issues r 4 properly triable thereby. r 5 DATED: October d , 1993 TIMOTHY M. THORNTON, JR. MEMBER OF NELSEN, THOMPSON, 6 PEGUE 6 THORNTON ,r A Professional Corporation 7 BY: 9 r TIMOT or JR. Attorfs f ntff HOME 10 URANCE OMPANY 11 r 12 13 r 14 15 16 r 17 18 r 19 r 20 21 r 22 23 r 24 r 25 26 27 e3/SK/8R IROER$/G2-092G.GiR 28 r -15- r -CURT r CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA r BRINDERSON CORPORATION, a CASE NUMBER California Corpo�atj,on . G77®CCl9DGRX7 m 1 CY- 93-3697 RSWL (JRx) COUNTERCLAIMANT r HOME IN�bRANCE COMPANY, a New York S U M M O N S Corporation; INDUSTRIAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF ' ON COUNTERCLAIM r DALLAS, a Texas Corporation; and INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF - - HAWAII , LTD. , DBOWD!6t1 Mix a Hawaii Corporation Counter- Defendants TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT(S) , You are hereby summoned and required to file with this court and serve upon r Thomas W. Johnson, Jr. r r Plaintiff's attorney, whose address is: Irell a Manella 840 Newport Center Dr. , .Ste. 500 Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 760-0991 an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you within 20 days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive r of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. r DATE: December 7, 1993 r CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT r UNDA T. ,.,..� r•A By Deputy ark �r . r (SEAL OF THE COURT) r S U M M O N S ,y -1A / i I IRELL & MANELLA Thomas W. Johnson, Jr. , State Bar No. 45398 r 2 Harry P. Weitzel, State Bar No. 149934 840 Newport Center Drive 3 Suite 500 r Newport Beach, California 92660-6324 - F 4 Telephone: (714) 760-0991 �LEnK.0 .^�• 'CT 0"U r 5 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Brinderson - 6 Corporation DEPUTY C_ry, TRALU1SThjj OF CAU'011" r 7 ey 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT r 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA r 10 11 HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a New ) CASE NO. CV 93-3697 RSWL (JRx) York Corporation, ) r 12 ) COUNTERCLAIM OF BRINDERSON Plaintiff, ) CORPORATION FOR DECLARATORY 13 ) RELIEF r V. ) 14 ) (Jury Trial Demanded) THE BRINDERSON CORPORATION, a ) 15 California Corporation, COUNTY ) Ytl SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE ) 16 COUNTY, a special government ) district, ) r 17 ) Defendants. ) 18 ) r ) 19 BRINDERSON CORPORATION, a ) California Corporation, ) 20 ) Counterclaimant. ) 21 ) V. ) r 22 ) HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, a New ) 23 York Corporation; INDUSTRIAL ) _ UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY ) 24 OF DALLAS, a Texas Corporation; ) and INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE COMPANY) 25 OF HAWAII, LTD. , a Hawaii ) Corporation. ) 26 ) Counterdefendants. ) r 27 28 n[u s unxuu �ro uo n....n 0 1�0•. YEIT0123.YY m Be.en U r �szeso-caza i 1 Defendant and Counterclaimant Brinderson Corporation 2 ("Brinderson") , hereby alleges as follows: 3 1. Jurisdiction is founded on diversity of citizenship Ynl 4 pursuant to 20 U.S.C. S 1332 (a) , as more fully set forth below. r 5 2 . The amount in controversy exceeds $50, 000. 00 exclusive 6 of interest and costs. 7 3 . Brinderson is, and at all times mentioned herein has 8 been, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of 9 the State of California, with its principal place of business in N.. 10 the County of orange, State of California. 11 4 . Brinderson is informed and believes, and on that basis 12 alleges, that Home Insurance Company ("Home") is, and at all times 13 mentioned herein has been, a corporation duly organized and .. 14 existing under the laws of the State of New York, with its r 15 principal place of business in New York City, New York. 16 Brinderson is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, 17 that Home is, and at all times mentioned herein has been, duly 18 authorized to transact the business of insurance in the State of y 19 California. 20 5. Brinderson is informed and believes, and on that basis 21 alleges, that Industrial Underwriters Insurance Company of Dallas, 22 Texas ("Industrial Underwriters") is, and at all times mentioned 23 herein has been, a corporation duly organized and existing under r 24 the laws of the State of Texas, with its principal place of 25 business in Dallas, Texas. Brinderson is informed and believes, r 26 and on that basis alleges, that Industrial Underwriters is, and at r 27 all times mentioned herein has been, duly authorized to transact 28 the business of insurance in the State of California. ie]u a MANe uno �<o wmoa —C o,. y[IT0123.0 N. 2P 1 �, 1S Be.m 1tr8]]4 i 1 6. Brinderson is informed and believes, and on that basis r 2 alleges, that Industrial Insurance Company of Hawaii, Ltd. , 3 ("Industrial Insurance") is, and at all times mentioned herein has r 4 been, a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of 5 the State of Hawaii, with its principal place of business in y 6 Honolulu, Hawaii. Brinderson is informed and believes, and on r 7 that basis alleges, that Industrial Insurance is, and at all times 8 mentioned herein has been, duly authorized to transact the r 9 business of insurance in the State of California. 10 7. venue lies in the Central District of California y 11 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. S 1391 (a) in that the claims for relief .. 12 alleged herein arose in this judicial district. 13 FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF r 14 FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF 15 (Against Home Insurance Company) r 16 8. Brinderson repeats and by this reference incorporates 17 herein each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 1817, above, as though set forth in full. r 19 9. Brinderson is in the construction business. On 20 March 19, 1990, Brinderson entered into a construction agreement r 21 with the County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County under r 22 which Brinderson was to build a central power generation system at 23 Treatment Plant No. 2 in the City of Huntington Beach, California ` 24 (the "Project") . 25 10. In return for valuable consideration, Home made, r 26 executed, and delivered to Brinderson at Brinderson's headquarters 27 in Irvine, California, its insurance policy No. GLRF385722 , which 28 covers the period from April 1, 1991, to April 1, 1992 . In return uuu 6 rAAx6w y Aun Gvi�me � naary relmerr Cneanen WEiT0123.W '2_ N.wW1 ft.-.CA 9]6B 02. r 1 for valuable consideration, Home made, executed, and delivered to 2 Brinderson at Brinderson's headquarters in Irvine, California, its 3 insurance policy No. GLRF385847, which covers the period from 4 April 1, 1992 , to April 1, 1993. These two policies are ,r 5 hereinafter referred to as the "Home Policies. " 6 11. The Home Policies provide coverage to Brinderson for, 7 inter a ia, all sums which Brinderson shall be legally obligated - 8 to pay as damages because of "property damage. " The Home Policies .. 9 also provide that Home will have the duty to defend any "suit" .o 10 seeking those damages. 11 12. On July 14, 1992 , the County Sanitation Districts of 12 Orange County (the "Districts") wrote to Brinderson and demanded 13 that Brinderson repair and restore property damage to certain 14 equipment at the Project. All claims that the Districts have made 15 or may make against Brinderson arising out of Brinderson's work 16 with respect to the Project are hereinafter referred to as the r, 17 "Claims." 18 13. Brinderson promptly notified Home of the Districts' .. 19 Claims. Home agreed to retain the law firm of Murchison & Cumming 20 to defend Brinderson. rr 21 14. Brinderson contends that the property damage which the ,., 22 Districts allege to have occurred in the Claims asserted against 23 Brinderson occurred, if at all, within the policy periods of the L` 24 Home Policies. Brinderson further contends that Home is obligated 25 to pay all of the defense costs incurred in defending against 26 those Claims and that Home is not entitled to reimbursement of any r 27 defense costs already paid. Brinderson has performed any and all - - 28 obligations it is required to perform to obtain coverage for the A l.M 6MPX �1 VA--.. W p s< ewcCw D, a x..ea.c..�m m. VEITV 123.VP _3— x..0 e..m,cw r aTeeoeaTa r 1 Claims under the Home Policies. All conditions to the obligations r 2 of Home to provide a defense and indemnity to Brinderson in 3 respect of the claims have occurred or have been duly waived by r 4 Home. w 5 15. Brinderson is informed and believes and thereon alleges 6 that Home contends that the Home Policies do not cover the 7 Districts' claims and that it therefore has no duty to defend 8 Brinderson. Brinderson is also informed and believes and thereon r 9 alleges that Home contends it is entitled to reimbursement of all r 10 defense costs already expended. 11 16. An actual controversy has arisen between Brinderson and r 12 Home regarding the construction and interpretation of the Home 13 Policies, and more particularly, the application of the Home r 14 Policies to the Claims asserted against Brinderson by the 15 Districts. r _- 16 17. A judicial declaration is necessary and appropriate at 17 this time in order to ascertain Brinderson's rights under the Home 18 Policies. Brinderson seeks a judicial declaration that Home is r 19 obligated to pay all defense costs incurred by Brinderson with 20 respect to the Districts' Claims and that Home is not entitled to 21 reimbursement for any defense costs already expended. r 22 23 24 25 r 26 .r 27 28 uiau s ru,w r a Tw n.��we rwcm aao H...e.a o.. yE1T0723.IN '4' r � C 93860.a1N rl 1 SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF 2 FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF 3 (Against Home Insurance Company, Industrial Underwriters Insurance .e 4 Company of Dallas, Texas, and Industrial Insurance Company of 5 Hawaii, Ltd. ) 6 18. Brinderson repeats and by this reference incorporates 7 herein each and every allegation set forth in paragraphs 1 through 8 17, above, as though set forth in full. Nr 9 19 . In return for valuable consideration, Industrial v 10 Underwriters made, executed, and delivered to Brinderson at 11 Brinderson's headquarters in Irvine, California, an umbrella 12 liability insurance policy numbered JU 910-9174, which covers the 13 period from April 1, 1991, to April 1, 1992. In return for r 14 valuable consideration, Industrial Insurance made, executed, and 15 delivered to Brinderson at Brinderson's headquarters in Irvine, 16 California, an umbrella liability insurance policy numbered JU 17 912-3040, which covers the period from April 1, 1992, to April 1, -- 18 1993. These two policies are hereinafter referred to as the Nd 19 "Umbrella Policies. " The Home Policies and the Umbrella Policies 20 are hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "Third-Party _- 21 Policies. " Home, Industrial Underwriters and Industrial Insurance 22 are hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "Third-Party 23 Carriers. " 24 20. Brinderson has given notice of the Claims to Industrial d 25 Underwriters and Industrial Insurance and has performed any and 26 all obligations it is required to perform to obtain coverage for r 27 the Claims under the Umbrella Policies. All conditions to the 28 obligations of Industrial Underwriters and Industrial Insurance to IPp16 MPMFIlA � aL.w>mmine nuuLp 940 N.N..WTC D, YEIT0123.VP -5- Ne Mn Bean.C4 y 8}98P6]}6 I provide indemnity to Brinderson in respect of the Claims have 2 occurred or have been duly waived by the insurers. 3 21. Brinderson contends that the property damage which the 4 Districts allege to have occurred in the Claims asserted against .. 5 Brinderson occurred, if at all, within the respective policy 6 periods of the Third-Party Policies. 7 22. Brinderson contends that the issues with respect to the 8 Third-Party Carriers' duty to indemnify Brinderson against the r 9 Districts' Claims are not yet ripe for adjudication because the 10 arbitration set to determine the liability between the various 11 parties in the underlying action (the "Arbitration") has not yet 12 occurred and Brinderson has not yet been found legally liable to 13 the Districts. However, in the alternative, if this Court finds .. 14 that the issues with respect to the Third-Party Carriers' duty to 15 indemnify Brinderson against the Districts' Claims are ripe for r 16 adjudication, as alleged by Home, Brinderson contends that the 17 Third-Party Carriers have such a duty to indemnify it against the 18 Districts' Claims. r 19 23. Brinderson is informed and believes and thereon alleges 20 that Home contends that the Home Policies do not cover the r 21 Districts' Claims and that it therefore has no duty to indemnify 22 Brinderson. 23 24. The Umbrella Policies provide coverage to Brinderson J for, inter lia, all sums which Brinderson shall be legally obligated to pay as damages arising out of an "occurrence" which r 26 are in excess of the Home Policies. Accordingly, any judicial r 27 declaration with respect to the Home Policies necessarily and 26 directly affects the Umbrella Policies. Y®16M416{A 110 �lw VvlM1rpe ^Ytlry ;Js"r Crm,om VEtio123.W -6- Yl6NlJH i I r 1 25. An actual controversy has thus arisen between Brinderson r 2 and the Third-Party Carriers regarding the construction and 3 interpretation of the Third-Party Policies, and more particularly, r 4 the application of the Third-Party Policies to the Claims asserted 5 against Brinderson by the Districts. r 6 26. If this Court finds that the issues with respect to the Y+ 7 Third-Party Carriers' duty to indemnify Brinderson against the 8 Districts' claims are ripe for adjudication, as alleged by Home, 9 Brinderson seeks a judicial declaration that the Third-Party 10 Carriers are obligated to indemnify Brinderson for the full amount w 11 of any award obtained by the Districts in the Arbitration, in .+ 12 accordance with their respective policy limits. 13 WHEREFORE, BRINDERSON PRAYS AS FOLLOWS: 14 A. For a declaration that Home is obligated to pay all 15 legal fees and costs incurred by Brinderson in the defense of the r 16 Districts' Claims, together with interest thereon, and that Home 17 is not entitled to reimbursement of any defense costs already 18 paid; ` 19 B. For a declaration that the Third-Party Policies require 20 the Third-Party Carriers to indemnify Brinderson for all damages 21 which Brinderson has or will become legally obligated to pay to ,r 22 the Districts, including the costs of making repairs to the 23 damaged property, in accordance with the respective limits of the ` 24 Third-Party Policies; 25 C. For costs incurred herein, including attorneys' fees; 26 and r 27 28 YGL�YY104 .ee.o abrww cw.m. uo x.....n c...a. YEIT0123.W -7- exwow. 1 .. 2 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 3 Defendant and Counterclaimant Brinderson Corporation hereby 4 demands a trial by jury of all issues properly triable thereby. 5 Dated: December 7, 1993 6 IRELL & MANELLA Thomas W. Johnson, Jr. a, 7 Harry P. Weitzel 8 - Harry P. itzel 10 Attorneys for Defendant an r' Counterclaimant Brinderson 11 Corporation r 12 13 ` 14 15 16 17 18 ` 19 20 21 r 22 23 ` 24 25 r 26 d 27 28 xcu a raxw w rer.�o.0 cwe.aw. I y[1T0123.uv '9' 4a 32660.632 C< 33800�6J]< i -' 1 PROOF OF SERVICE " 2 I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My 3 business address is 840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 500, Newport Beach, California 92660. 4 On December 7, 1993 , I served the foregoing document 5 described as COUNTERCLAIM OF BRINDERSON CORPORATION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF on each interested party, as follows: 6 Timothy M. Thornton, Jr. , Esq. 7 Nelsen, Thompson, Pegue & Thornton 2425 Olympic Blvd. , Ste. 4000W 8 Santa Monica, CA 90404-4032 r, Attorneys for Plaintiff Home Insurance Co. 9 10 X (BY MAIL) I placed a true copy of the foregoing document in a sealed envelope addressed to each 11 interested party as set forth above. I caused each such envelope, with postage thereon fully prepaid, 12 to be deposited with the United States Postal Service. I am readily familiar with Irell & 13 Manella's practice for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States 14 Postal Service. Under that practice, the correspondence would be deposited with the United 15 States Postal Service on that same day with postage 'h thereon fully 'prepaid in the ordinary course of _. 16 business. .+ 17 Executed on December 7, 1993 , at Newport Beach, California. 18 I certify that I am employed in the office of a member of the r bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. 19 I declare under penalty of perjury under the United States of 20 America and the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. _ . 21 ; i/ 22 Judith A. Richter 23 Name Si.g ature r � � 24 25 26 27 28 iao<a mex]ue r •u.rmw.. m.y x<w yE1T0123.VF• —10— m6 Mw CA 9]l806]]< Page 1 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Brinderson Corporation C. 0. No.: Seventeen 07) r Date: December8.1993 Job: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Consultina Engineers r Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Podtieti $ 35,701 .87 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the fallowing additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. r ITEM 1 - HEAT RESERVOIR SUPPLY FLOW METER LINER REPLACEMENT This item replaces the internal liner that protects the flow meter sensing system. The specified liner that was supplied by the Contractor could not withstand the temperatures that were encountered within the system. This item as negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6 (b)(2)A of the General Provisions (Reference PCH 109)• ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,124.05 r TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEM EXHAUST SAMPLE PORTS This item will provide two additional 4-inch diameter sample ports for each of the five engine exhaust stacks. The new locations were required by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10.6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions (Reference PCH 117). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $13,072.15 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days N r "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" Y Page 2 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �y 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Brinderson Corporation C. 0. No.: Seventeen 1171 ., Date: December B. 1993 Job: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-19-2 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Consultina Engineers ITEM 3 - INSTALLATION OF GROSS METERING EQUIPMENT This item is the installation of added equipment supplied by Southern California Edison utility to measure the gross amount of power generated at the Central Power Generation facility. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions (Reference PCH 106). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $13,059.44 - TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days b ITEM 4 - ADDITIONAL INTERLOCKING FOR 12 KV SWITCHGEAR This item will provide additional interlocking to allow the VAR/Power Factor controls to operate either isolated or in parallel with the utility. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2) of the General Provisions (Reference PCH 112). r ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,303.46 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days _ ITEM 5 - ALTERNATE POWER SOURCE FOR CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEM (CEMS) This item will remove the CEMS from the control system uninterruptible power supply and relocate its source to the building supply. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2) of the General Provisions (Reference PCH 101). " ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $521 .62 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days .d "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" r ., Page 3 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 .. CHANGE ORDER Contractor: 8rinderson Corporation C. O. No.: Seventeen(171 tr+ Date: December B. 1993 Job: Central Power Generation System at Plant No, 2. Job No. J-19-2 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Consult i no Engineers r ITEM 6 - ADDITIONAL 12 KV SWITCHGEAR RELAYS r This item will provide additional relays associated with the operation of the automatic generator loading controls. This work was required by CSDOC staff. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2) of the General Provisions (Reference PCH 107). r ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,417.22 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7 - 6-INCH LUBRICATION OIL SUCTION SPOOL w The investigation to determine damage to the Plant No. 2 engine-generators required the destruction of a lubrication oil suction spool. This item will replace that section of r pipe. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions (Reference PCH 113). w ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,255.93 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days .d ITEM 8 - AUTOMATIC GENERATOR LOAD CONTROL WIRING MODIFICATION ° This item will provide power to the automatic generator load controls to be powered - directly from the uninterruptible power supply. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2) of the General Provisions (Reference PCH 114). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $968.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days w r _ "G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" r .y Page 4 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 r FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Brinderson Corporation C. 0. No.: Seventeen 1171 t� Date: December B. 1993 Job: Central Power Generation System at Plant No, 2. Job No, J-19-2 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers ITEM 9 - ADDITIONAL TESTING OF GENERATOR r This item provides for additional test of the generators to determine if damage occurred to the units during the prolonged time that the engines were not running. This testing was required by CSDOC staff. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(b)(2) of the General Provisions r (Reference PCH 115), . ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $488.50 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 10 - BATTERY TESTING A problem with the battery systems was encountered and the Contractor was directed to investigate. The problem was in modifications required by CSDOC. The investigation was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions (Reference PCH 116). r ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $791.50 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days r ITEM 11 - POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM START-UP 4 _ This item provides a credit for the start-up of the.power management system. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions (Reference PCH 117). DEDUCT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($3,300.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days r "'G-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-4" Page 5 of 6 - COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Brinderson Corporation C. O. No.: Seventeen 1171 Date: December 8. 1993 Job: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $35,701.87 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or ,q damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. b SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: March 19, 1990 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: March 17, 1992 w Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 218 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 948 Calendar Days a Revised Final Completion Due Date: October 21, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: m w Original Contract Price $19,753,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 1,990,997.10 This Change (Add) (Deduet) $ 35,701.87 Amended Contract Price $21 ,779,698.97 b m "G-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-5" r Page 6 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Brinderson Corporation C. 0. No.: Seventeen(17) Date: December 8. 1993 Job: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers Board Authorization Date: December 8, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA m Submitted by Recommended by: ngineer Date 'Construction Manager Date Ap ro y% Aped as to For: r� r CFrr6rctor of Engineering Date /General Counsel Date v Accepted by: ti BRINDERSON CORPORATION t" Contractor Date "G-6" AGENDA ITEM #9( C) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-6" r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ./ d ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 0 PO BOX B127� E 00 [I21 r, i AXN VALLEY,MIFOP A E2RA.2127 December 29, 1993 b REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: December 29. 1993 - 5,30 p.m, EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Director Thomas Saltarelli Charles E. Puckett Vice Joint Chairman Director Sheldon S. Singer A. B. "Buck" Catlin Past Joint Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman John Collins Chairman, District 2 Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 STAFF PRESENT: John C. Cox, Jr. Chairman, District 5 James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Barry Hammond Chairman, District 7 Gary Streed, Director of Finance John M. Gullixson Chairman, District 13 Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Roger Stanton County Supervisor - Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of William Steiner County Supervisor Maintenance 4, Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations ABSENT: Robert Richardson Chairman, District 1 Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 - 1) Plant No. 2 Central Power Generating System Engine Damage Dispute Status Report. The General Counsel provided the Committee members with a verbal status report on the arbitration proceedings pertaining to resolution of the dispute between the Districts, the engine manufacturer (Cooper) and the installation contractor (Brinderson) regarding the Plant No. 2 Central Power Generating System engine damages. A decision from the arbitration panel pursuant to the Three-Party Agreement between Cooper, Brinderson and the Districts is now anticipated around the end of January. w Report of the Executive Committee December 29, 1993 2) Consideration of Chance Order No. 4 to Purchase Order No. 57725 with Advanced Engine Technologies Corporation for Additional Management of Engine Exhaust Emission and Fuel Efficiency Testing at Central Power d, Generation Facilities. The Director of Engineering reported that in May 1993, the Directors approved Change Order No. 3 to a purchase order issued to Advanced Engine Technologies Corporation (AETC) for services related to inspection, support startup and other duties related to the engines installed in the Central Power Generation System at Plants 1 and 2. AETC is the consulting engine expert _ originally engaged by the Districts to assist in correction of the engine damages at Plant 2. The May action increased the total authorized funding to .= $271,000.00, adding emission and fuel efficiency testing support. Mr. Dawes recommended that the purchase order amount be increased $50,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $321,000.00. Additional services are required by AETC to resolve unforeseen difficulties with the continuous emissions monitoring equipment common at both plants. The original emissions monitoring equipment turned out to be very inflexible, with difficulties experienced in monitoring the engine exhaust gas flow at varying exhaust temperatures. AETC successfully designed and tested a revised flow monitoring method using the original equipment, which performs better over a varying temperature range. The revised method required the relocation of a flow sensor at each engine and minor programming changes (this is not related to the earlier AQMD sample port relocation). The proposed change order will add additional funds to cover management of ` the fuel efficiency and emissions testing which is currently scheduled for completion in February 1994, continuing supportfor AQMD compliance testing, and other staff support. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Committee concurs with the staff recommendation to authorize Change Order No. 4 to Purchase Order No. 57725 with Advanced Engine Technologies w Corporation, for the additional amount of $50,000.00, increasing the total compensation from $271,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $321,000.00. w 2 Y� Newspaper Articles r W r Y� J v `r ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS r NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Beeson Page Date " R i P � ;Zs-qy/ IJ�sivets Aw�u�i�`/��1;�hbk <n Caw aif Sanitation Districts awarded $1 .5 million 'GOVERNMENT: The county sewer agency had owned sewage agency had was fully liable for allowing the sought $4.9 million from contractors involved to warned in 1991 that the engines sand to get into the engines and and oil piping were improperly oil pi ping,attorneys for the agen- a $7O million f1rOJf!Ct. stared and being ruined by sand cy and Brinderson said Thurs- "� and rust. But after the second day. By CHRIS KNAP @est loser,and must pay$3.6 mil- waming, employee Vic tor- ' We're very disappointed the Orange County Register lion In Judgments, including$2.1 rynski was told by his boss,chief about the finding against us;" ml iion to Cooper Industries, operator Doug Cook, "not to said Hrinderson's attorney, Ir Arbitrators have awarded the manufacturer of the engines and make any more waves an it;'ac- James D.Carraway."But it was Orange County Sanitation Dis- generators. The sewage agency cording to a 1992 memo to Thom- also a win for us in the sense that Them- tricts S1.S million because of con. gets $1.5 million, far below the as M. Dawes,the agency's chief the total damages being sought rector errors on a $70 million $4.9 million asked at Mal. engineer. (by Cooper and the agency)were ,,,,sower-generation project, less The case revolved around Dawes later told The Orange $7 million; they got about half of —than one-third of what the sew- sand, rust and other contamina- County Register,"In retrospect, that." age agency sought, attorneys lion that circulated through the I think we should have been more Sewer-agency attorney Daniel aid Thursday. oil of five 16-cylinder engines in sensitive to a lot of things." K. Spradlin said he was disap- Brinderson Corp., the con. 1992,causing extensive damage. A panel of three retired judges Itsiction contractor,was the big. Two employees of the publicly ruled this week that Brinderson Please see AWARD Page 2 r ' AWARD• Sanitation district Sanitation districts serve nearly all homes in O.0 wins $1 .5 million judgment Nine districts make up the The public is represented by Orange County Sanitation Dis- 42-member board of directors, tricts, which treat waste water made up of members of city tons t for about 600,000 homes-nearly councils and the Orange County Anted that the agency was an- Brown and Caldwell was not every home in the county. - Board of Supervisors. Heys le tfees and no recover e�rlyy $3 manor-n attor- named agencyinthe uit, eve Sthough Households pay monthly Because cities overlap multi- .,electric bills that were run up to reroute the piping according to charges on water bats, and an pie districts, one director might arms the year it took to repair Cooper's specification. ednuul user fee is attached to be a member of more than one arse damage. Cooper Industries was ab• homeowners' property-tax bills. district. Last year the average user fee Without that delay,the project, solved of liability, and Brinder- was $80.27; the average fee in Orange County Supervisor which burns sewer gas and Hafts- son was ordered to pay$2.1 mil- 1990 was S47.96. Roger Stanton sits on four dis- al gas,would have paid for the Hon,through the agency,to cov- tricts and Orange County Super- _Jstrict's electricity plus earned er Cooper's repair bill. The The districts have a $200 mil- visor Williams Steiner on five. -1 milaon to$2 million per year sewage agency must still pay lion operating budget and a staff The directors meet as a joint through the sale of surplus pow- Cooper$2.1 million even if Brin- of 620. The Orange County sew- board in sessions held the second r, according to agency esti- derson does not pay the full age agency is the third-largest Wednesday of each month. fates. The agency did not seek amount of theirjudgment,the at. Publicly owned water-treatment 'Zh recover that lost revenue. torneys said. agency west of the Mississippi. -Chris Krrepmie Register The arbitrators said the dis- Cary L.Brinderson,chairman •rict's consulting engineer, of the construction company, Irwn end Caidwen, had con- said in a statement Thursday Hunter Corp. physically completed ahead of saarIlimed to the engine damage by that his tympany still believes "The arbitrators determined schedule." improperly locating the all filters Cooper was at fault. Brinderson that our contractual responsibil- One of Brinderson's insurance so they provided only a mini- noted that similar engine con- ity, was to start the engines and companies, Home Insurance, soon of protection.Memos intro- lamination was found eta simi- without damage;' Brinderson has sued Brinderson and the sew- uced during the trial showed lar project at the agency's Foun- said in the statement. "We will age agency in federal court in an "sat the sewage agency's engi- tain Valley plant, where the en- abide by the judgment and pay effort to avoid liability. Still, near, had approved the change, gines were again supplied by for the damage. This is unfortu. Spradlin said,"I believe we have -arraway said. Cooper but the contractor was nate because the project was a sound source of recovery." r r r t t [ [ t tf )HPr(att( .f)1 jf l I Y I oNl Q I 11N U�� f H! - f S t I I I NEV 1tSPAPER KIPPING NGS ► Of y Name of Paper Section I page Date Subject R is+efr' News 1 2-27-9 CSDOe News tSfo,- Errors cost O.C. sewer agency millions GOVERNMENT: officials Ignored warnings, then percent, about S32 a year. pect to design,build and operate with septic sewage could clog the took a $15 million hit over 4 years in repairsJ. Wayne Sylvester, the agen- a system with a current value of pumps of a$140,000 dumping sta. J. general manager, declined $1.3 billion and not experience tion. Four years and$1.4 million and lost revenue — while residents' rates rose. to be interviewed about design some problems is simply unreal-. later the project, initially de- and construction troubles at sev- istic, anywhere." signed so that sewage had to be Oran least$tS million in the past four oral projects. But in a prepared Four projects in particular Pumped uphill, was stiff not 9y years, documents obtained by statement, the agency said: were plagued by problems, ac- working. The Orangea County Register The Orange County Register "Every reasonable effort is cording to contract records, en- ►A$2S million project to cover Engineering mistakes, con- show. made to design, construct and gineering memos and the agen- sewage basins for odor control is struction problems and cost The problems came at a time operate facilities In a trouble- cy's internal reports: Please see SEWER Page 18 overruns at the Orange County when the sewage-treatment free manner. But this is not a ►Agency engineers disregard- Sanitation Districts have cost the agency was boosting fees on perfect world. Problems are ed warnings that rags, plastic ►GIFTS:Contractor treat officials publicly run sewage agency at most Orange County homes by 67 sometimes encountered. To ex- bags and other debris trucked in to thousands in meals.Page 18 But the district has not been SEWER: Problems include a 'suppression of dissent' tion tpre Twoconstrnc- wit workerr ss d died early this month after being severely FROM 1 burned in an accident at the in eo and sapplies too close to computers. sign consultants,a failure to con- time jobs and have trusted Syl- agency's Huntington Beach ttacturs used alum aluminum instead sign costs went from$1.7 mil. alder how interconnected sys- Vester and engincering director plant. The state Occupational of stainless steel bolts to support Icon to$3.3 mutton,and new corn- tems would affect each other, Thomas M. Dawes to shepherd Safety and Health agency is in- the dome-shaped covers. The utter controls will cost S400,000. and a "suppression of dissent" projects, make good decisions ,vestigating. A University of Southern Call- when things went wrong. • A review of "General Manag- bolts corroded and same fee off, forms engineering expert who �Meshkatl cautioned that the the agency's them informed about and the agency is facing an esti- studied engineering memos and problems should be taken as a ihm, complex opera- pared by Dawes and edited ch are and re- tnated S3.S miWon repair but. red'orts about the projects for warning that other design flaws ►Two agency -employees The Register found flaws in en s- could , hidden at the agency's "Once that trust is breached signed by Sylvester, shows that es B the whole house of cards can the two officials did not always seamed a era that engines fora netting and design methodology, pants. come clown," Stanton said. "I Provide the 42 directors with full power generation project were in'management and In project These are incidents that hope that's not the case here.But information. aeRing contaminated but theyicoed e with h sand 04might. cpuld be precursors for a major 1. think enough questions have p Thank God that the space. accident." been raised that this has to be ' For instance, Sylvester and tbtnakeany morewaves."When shuttle is not designed like this... William Mahoney,joint chair- pursued. t think the directors Dawes told directors twice in t8'd'engines were started, bear- oF�every time you launched, i[ man of the districts'board of di- will want a tat of questions an- 1993 that agency engineers were tdk damage resulted. Costs and Ahld have crashed," said Naj- rectors, declined to be inter- willswe w ." q not aware when the dump station revenue losses so far exceed $6 mbdn Meshkati,who specializes Viewed. But Orange County Su- The sanitation districts, which was designed that trucked-in million. In identifying human and organi- pervisor Roger Stanton,who sits (real water for 600,000 Oran a waste could have so much other .►A S30 million pumping ate- I nid n t error in large industrial on the agency's executive board, g debris. But ow that the memos tide Nat sends treated water out g Founty homes, won a national ttll9ea has been la ed b elec- plsi'nts. on dismay at The Regis- award from the U.S. Environ- 'from 1989 show that the original P gu Y Meshkati said the four projects ter's findings. cliental Protection Agency last Resigner had specifically warned trtTal Interference and control showed similar problems m- 'Stanton said none of the direc- bf the problem and recommend- ploblems, some of them caused cladin cost overruns• constant lots he knows were aware of the Year far environmental compli- ed a solution,but was overruled by.a design that placed power ••(ishin a editions"for new de- extent of the problems. He said ante and energy cons "often.g xp P LY agency engineers, including sign consultants,a failure to can. most of the directors have full- yawes. Asked to explain the discrep- - "Thank God that faulty. PAr e Z z-F ,� ancy, the agency in a prepared Repairs at the Fountain Valley "] thinkthe gtarement said Sylvester was not the SP8Ce shuttle plant and the loss of the ability to aware of the engineering discus is not designed generate power for sale have directors will lions.Dawes declined to be inter- cost the agency at least an addi- want a lot of - viewed. like this.' tional S2.5 million, according to questions •'I get the impression that the NIDMEDIN MESHKATI engineering estimates. reports we were given were buff- " Do gt W en fit enng m answered ereA considerably," said Stan- Californiaia engineering expert THE OCEAN OUTFALL ROGER STANTON Ion, a >z-year member of the PUMPING STATION agency's board of duemors. "If eluding the faBurc to include a county supervisor the directors are being given in- grinder or even a strainer to pre` Since the first trial runs m late formation that doesn't represent vent rags,plastic bags and other 19g9, a S30 million station that they addresssthat very publicly;' the tads, either intentionally or debris typically found in the Pumps treated sewage out to sea MHe lug said. — unintantioanBy, it's unccept- waste from clogging up the sun- has been plagued by problems. He suggested that the agency's able." tion's pumps. Electrical engineer George directors consider reorganizing District records and engineer- The flaws had so crippled the Thum reported in 1991 that m- the management structure so ing memos show that three of the station that it had operated only shielded 750-amp cables were that quality control is indepen- - contractors involved in the four four full days in nearly three routed just 10 feet from comput. dent, rather than headed by the problem projects have continued years. Black and Veatch said. er controls,and monitors"would same engineer who picks the to be hired despite criticism of In two reports in 1993, Sylves lion" he leaning in one d en contractors. their work by district staff and ter told the directors, "When the lion" when pump motors were "The people who order the pro, —outside consultants. The three system was designed the signifl- operated.m show that the agency's jeer have then sdecision makted intereat ining' are John Carello Engineers, cant amount of debris that is of- Brown and Caldwell Engineers, ten in the trucked wastes was an- engineers have blamed both Car- on contramars, Meshkati said, and Advanon Constructors. known." olio, the designer, and General and an tend to minimize prob CaroBo Engineers and Brown But agency memos show that Electric, supplier of the pumps lems. —and Caldwell have treated top of- on July 19, 1989, engineers from and motors.General Electric ar- Agency director Stanton, who ficials at the agency to numerous rWA Engineers, the original de- gued in 1989 that they had sup- has a doctorate in management, free meals,public records show. signer, met with agency engi- plied equipmem to Carollo's agreed. Cerullo bought $4,471 worth of neers and '•expressed concern specifications. at a meeting July 27. Dawes at meals for Sylvester from 1984 to that the variety of materials "We can only assume that we tended, approved the grinder- -1991. dumped may cause stoppage or are again being held responsible less design and ordered that it be The Orange County District At- plugging of the pump assemblies for oversights of (the agency's) completed in one month, the torney is investigating whether or discharge lines." Agency en- engineering staff and consul- memos show. Sylvester violated state law by gineers said they didn't want the pants (CamUo)," the GE project Last year the agency hired a -continuing to preside over the grinder. manager wrote. new contractor for E250,000 to Carollo contracts after accepting IWA asked for three months to GE's contract eventually was tear out the failed station,raise it gifts in excess of the state's$250- complete the design, hold team reduced by S200,000 but Carillo's six feet and install a sloped pipe a-year connict-of-interest limit. engineering meetings and per- design fees climbed from the that wouldn't need any pumps. .Sylvester has denied violating form quality control. original $1.7 million to S3.3 mil- The total spent on the $140,000 the law.- But IWA was overruled again . lion. station an far exceeds $1.4 mil- Officials at Advanco m Constc- by the district's engineering stuff The Register obtained memos lion, and further repairs are tors and Brown and Caldwell de- and A minion for power bale authored by four operations and pending. -fended their work,saying it had paid during the year the genre- engineering il defers work.ticiz- But THE BASIN COVERS all been checked and appmved for project was stalled. in Bo fiasco design Lobe hired by the sewage agency's map"- Cooper Industries, which built for engineering work despite the Five months after the Feb. 15 rsC tors. Repeated efforts to obtain the engines, won a S2.1 million completion of a $25 million pro responses from Carollo were un- judgment for its repair ex- concerns, contract documents jest to cover sewage basins for -successful. show. The agency's official state- Censer: the agency must pay In a prepared statement, the ears discovered the tdome-sshaped Cooper if Brinderson D unable sews e agency acknowledged meta said the three coany spec to. ti t cy 8 covers were th danger of conape- "have neveronside been given any an, The arbitrators also farad that unanticipated electrical abut fer-mid trig because the bolts supporting teal consideration in any man- the agency's design consultant, they at the pmDsmtionbutsate them were corroding. -'net, for any realm,on any prn- Brown & Cne dam had not they"do not necessarily indicate An October 3991 analysis by jam." used to engine damagebynot fol- either bad design or bad equip- the agency's maintenance chief. To chart the historyof the four merit.' towing Cooper's specifications Me Memos Edwin E. Hodges, said that ub- projects,The Register reviewed for oil-filter er t trial showed Memos warm Construction and its sub .hundreds of pages of contract the agency's trial showed that A CALL FOR contractor, Temcoq had used documents, engineering memos the agency's engineers had ap BETTER OVERSIGHT aluminum instead of stainless and internal reports. proved the change. The agency Meshkati,associate director of steel bolts, changed the shape of sti spent M.000 replumbing the oil USC's Intute of Safety and the dome supports and failed to ,-THE WASTE system, Systems Management, coat structural aluminum with be- DUMPING STATION Brown t Caldwell was not pressed alarm o employees s" protective coatings. After spending four years and named in the Finn.a mg told "not to make waves" Hodges concluded -that Ad- that 0.1 million to try to get the Four, Robert M.vice Finn, i Brown t when they questioned one pro- the co agency fad thbut added that Main Valley station operating Caldwell vice president, last jecl. the agency and the original d Engi- properly, the sewage agency s°�described the oil-filter Iota- "An organization that pro signer (Malcolmd to th pmb- hired engineering consultant tion as',•a minor thing"and said mates safety and quality encour- nears) contributed to the prob Slack and Veatch last year to the sewage agency would have ages dissent, encourages the lem by not catching the changes ve3ti ate what went wrong. sued them if their work had been venting of disagreement, and and by running exhaust fans too major slowly, creating a cloud of sul- The consultant found 14 deficiencies in the design and nostmction of the station, in- - P0.�e 3 o f y phuric acid that hastened corro- THE POWER sion. GENERATION PROJECT Materials failure expert Dr. Naresh Kar said in a 199, -eport A S70 million electrical power BACKGROUND to the agency that the design was generation project in Huntington r ..not good engineering practice." Beach,to be fueled by sewer gas, SANITATION AGENCY Sylvester disclosed the corm, was crippled in 1992 after sand, HAS 620 EMPLOYES, sion in an August 1992 report to rust and metal were carried the directors. He.estimated re- through eight 4,0001horsepower $200 MILLION BUDGET r pair costs at SSM,000 and said the engines. district's lawyers were looking Memos show that operations Nine districts make up the into the problem, supervisor Vic Zorzynski and fa- Orange County Sanitation Districts, Last year,a new design consul- cilities manager R.C. Pigmon whid,treat waste water for about tant, Camllo, estimated the cost had warned in 1991 that the en- "' of replacing the beams and coat- gins and oil piping were being home i homes - needy every ing the structural aluminum at contaminated by sand and rust. home n the county. S3.3 million, not including at But chief operator Doug Cook A household pays through least S200,DD0 in design costs. told Zorzynski that the issue was monthly charges on its water bill; Hodges' report says the agen- under the control of the Engi- plus an annual user fee is attached cy notified Advanco and Temcor neering Department and asked to the property-tax bill. of the corrosion by letter in Au- him "not to make any more last year,the average user fee .,a gust 1990. 'waves' on it," according to a was Sa0.27; the average fee in 1990 But Ran Devine,vice president July 1, 1992 memo from mainte- was$47.96. of construction for Advanco,said trance chief Hodges to Dawes. The districts have a $200 million this week that Advanco was nev- "In retrospect,we should have operating budget and 620 employ- er told that they and their sub- been more sensitive to a lot of ees.The Orange County sewage contractor were being blamed things," Dawes told The Regis- agency is the third-largest publicly- for the failure. He said the sew- ter in 1992 owned water-treatment agency age agency's inspectors had Last week, the sewer agency west of the Mississippi. checked all the company's work won a $1.5 million judgment The public is represented by a 42- and approved it.: against Brinderson Corp.,which member board of directors,all of Devine said the one-year war- assembled the piping and in- them either city council members or ranty an the work expired three stalled the engines at the plant. members of the Orange County years ago but added, "H we But the agency had sought $4.9 Board of Supervisors. . found there was some kind of million: W0,000 for legal fees Became cities overlap multiple problem,we'd still be interested ,You never should have some, districts,one director might be a in finding a solution.We're inter- body in charge of production in member of more than one district ested in protecting a" reputa- charge of quality control,"Stan- Orange County Supervisor Roger '-' tion." ton said. 'If there's a problem you Stanton sits on four districts and shouldn't downplay it. You Orange County Supervisor William should confront the problem and Steiner on five.All district directors get it fixed. H you downplay it <it together as a joint board in you impede your ability to get it meetings held the second Wednes- fixed " day of each month. r na y� � �d94YR0��55�tlJ JP ra r. . vrANU= uvuN I Y SANITATION DISTRICTS NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section I Page Date �p t-ro R A Subject ♦? i5fer M( ro 13-2-9qJ CSjpoC News Sto/ f EDITORIALS Potty training needed hat yucky smell wafting Surprise: All this out of the Orange County waste occurred as the Sanitation District is the stench of tax dollars turn- sewage-treatment 1e, ing to flames. agency Was raising After a major investigation, the Oran fees on most e Register's Chris Knap has revealed g a chronicle of incompetence and County homes by 67 spendthriftery among the sewer bri- gade that makes the Keystone P.D. look like Scotland Yard.Engineering year- pratfalls, construction snafus, and �+ slapstick spending overruns have si- 100 percent. "Or every time you phoned away at least $15 million of launched, it would have crashed." the publicly run agency's budget Surprise: All this waste uncovered over the past four years. Most of the by Chris Knap occurred as the sew- missteps could have been avoided by age-treatment agency was raising simply listening to warnings from fees on most Orange County homes concerned employees—but it seems by 67 percent, about $32 per year. that suppression of dissent is part of To be sure, a saititation agency the agency's managerial philosophy. spokeswoman takes issue with all For instance, a deaf ear greeted these findings. "The County Sanita- warnings that a $140,000 dumping tion Districts and their employees station would-be clogged by rags, have received no less than 31 nation- plastic bags, and other debris al, state and regional awards of ex- trucked in with septic sewage. As a cellence in the past five years,"says result, the station remains on the Corinne Clawson, the agency's pub- blink despite$1.4 million flushed into lic information officer. ..... We be- it over several years. Have our outstanding record speaks And two employees were told in for itself." 1991 "not to make waves" when they We think their record of fee hikes warned that engines for a power gen- and engineering and construction eration project were getting contain- blunders speaks louder. inated with sand and rust. The dam- Whether it's Pete Wilson or Bill age to bearings when the engines Clinton or Marian Bergeson or the were finally fired up has led to more Orange County sewer people,the pof- than $6 million in unanticipated iticians and bureaucrats who come costs. to us demanding more tax money al- The smelly examples go on, ways say they really, really need it. prompting a USC engineering expert Meanwhile, the agencies for which consulted by the Register to warn they're serving as bagmen (or wom- thattheagency'spractices"couldbe en) are busy flushing greenbacks precursors for a major accident." down toilets. Isn't it time that aver- "Thank God that the space shuttle is age citizens refused to give the not designed like this ...," said Naj- thieves any more money to be poured medin Meshkati, referring -to' a into sewers, ratholes, or black holes ., pumping station whose design costs and demanded instead that govern- have run over estimates by nearly ment be forced into potty training? ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ` NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS Name of Paper Section Page Date Subject �egisf"er Metro ) 3-lo q+{ C..SDOC News sf6ry r Sewer directors agree to hire expert analyst GOVERNMENT: Cost - John Collins,who chairs District r overruns and other No. 2, expressed concerns about I'OtltemS tldVe C06t 8t the agency's management struc- P tore and the work of its engineer- least $15 million. ing consultants. By CHRIS KNAP _ "We represent millions of peo- ple in this county who have a right to know our response,"Col- 7 be directors of the Orange lins said. "There is a definite County Sanitation Districts need for a pure, unbiased party agreed late Wednesday to hire an to do an analysis." independent expert to investi- Joint Chairman William Ma-. r gate engineering problems and honey,who opposed the indepen- cost overruns that have cost the dent investigation, said General sewer agency at least$15 million Manager Wayne Sylvester rebut- in the past four years. ted the newspaper article in a The problems, disclosed by confidential memo. The Orange County Register on Feb. 27, include a dump station But Orange County Supervisor that cost 10 times its$140,000 bud- Roger Stanton, a 12-year &rec- ,�, get and a power-generation pro- tor,said Sylvester's memo"cmr ject that cost$6 million extra be- firms all the figures in the Regis- cause sand contaminated engine ter. It hits right on, almost word oil. for word, the money actually r The agency's top engineers spent." were warned beforehand that the The average homeowner pays. projects could go awry, internal about $108 a year to the sewer memos show. agency in property taxes and r Fountain Valley Councilman user fees. r " r r r l� J J U Staff Reports u U ll U J J COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.a0%8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA e2726-9177 10844 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92MB-7018 (714)9112.2411 t✓ February 28, 1994 yl Mr. Chris Knap The Orange County Register 625 North Grand Avenue Santa Ana, Ca. 92701 Re: Public Records Act Request for Documents Dated February 2, 1994 w Dear Mr. Knap: This letter will serve to acknowledge the original receipt of letter dated February 2, 1994, to recite the chronology of documentation and events that have occurred subsequent to that date, wherein documentation was provided to you,and to comply with the provisions of the California Public ., Records Act, specifically, our advice to you that all information would be provided on or before February 28, 1994. 1. By letter dated February 2, 1994(received February 3, 1994),addressed to Thomas M. m Dawes, Director of Engineering, you requested to look at the Districts' engineering records pertaining to four particular projects—namely: -+ A. Wastehauler Station, Fountain Valley; B. Aluminum Domes Over Primary Clarifiers, Plant 1 and Plant 2; r C. Central Generation Project; and D. Outfall Booster Station Controls. 2. By letter dated February 14, 1994, the General Manager, J. Wayne Sylvester, responded to your letter of February 2, 1994, and further noted the need for an additional period of time to fully respond, all as authorized by Government Code Section 6256.1. 3. As noted in the February 14, 1994 letter of Mr. Sylvester, the Districts made available to you, for your examination at the Districts' offices, nearly all records which you had requested. Those examinations occurred on February 9, 10 and 14, 1994. ,.I .e r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Page Two foam EIISIWWE February 28, 1994 - eo eo.BR) roureux veu[r,4=FOARIA sarae-nn n+.nesasan 4. By letter dated February 15, 1994 from Ms. Corinne Clawson, Public Information Officer, the Districts provided you with a detailed status of their responses to the letter request for information dated February 2, 1994. This letter provided detailed reference to each of the four _. projects identified in Subparagraphs A through D above. That letter concluded that to the best of the Districts' ability and knowledge, all records have been supplied. and the request has been fully satisfied. 5. By letter dated February 16, 1994, faxed to the Districts at 11:22 p.m., you indicated that there was a list of missing information for each of the four projects. In fact, re Central Generation Project, you did not indicate missing documents, but merely asked a question relating to settlement offers. 6. By letter dated February 16, 1994, and revised for a minor correction dated February 17, 1994, Ms. Corinne Clawson provided a detailed response to your letter dated February 15, 1994, as well as your hand delivered letter of February 16, 1994. Concerning your requested records for the Wastehauler Station and Outfall Booster Station, we indicated that we were undertaking a further inquiry of personnel at the Districts to ascertain whether other records were in fact available. Please be advised that we have completed that investigation, and have determined that there are no additional records in existence for those two projects other than what has been previously provided to you. As noted above, you did not request additional records for the Central Power - Generation Project. The question posed was answered by this letter. Re the Clarifier Aluminum Dome Covers, as previously advised, any records remaining are held _ by the General Counsel and are the subject of attorney/client privilege, pending the initiation of possible litigation for recovery from responsible parties. .. 7. By letter dated February 17, 1994, you posed both general questions and specific questions on the four projects. It did not include any specific request for documentation. 8. By letter dated February 18, 1994, and revised same date for minor corrections, Ms. Corinne Clawson provided to you a three-page detailed response to your letter dated February 17, 1994, answering six of the nine questions. 9. By letter dated February 24, 1994, the Districts provided answers to the remaining three of nine questions that needed further inquiry, as indicated in the Districts' letter to you dated ® February 18, 1994. This letter of February 24, 1994, further provided the detailed responses to your telephonic message inquiry dated February 22, 1994. 10. To the best of our knowledge this letter, combined with all the previous access to records which you have been afforded, and the copies of records which you have specifically requested and received, now fully complies with rovisio f California Public Records Act, r pursuant to your request. yne ylv ter Ge ral Man r reazgl COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 EL11127 AVENUE 00 Ro BOX e1n March 15, 1994 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 927298129 n141982-2411 STAFF REPORT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT PILOT PROJECT EPA/CRWQCB EMAP ONE TIME (SUMMER 1994 QUARTER) MODIFICATION TO DISTRICTS' OCEAN MONITORING PROGRAM The purpose of this staff report is to advise the Directors that an ocean monitoring pilot program called the Southern California Bight Pilot Project (SCBPP) is proposed to be conducted during the summer of 1994 in the coastal area known as the Southern California Bight and that the Districts have been asked to participate by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB). The SCBPP will result in minor changes to the way the Districts conduct our summer program during the summer of 1994 at an added cost of approximately $30,000. It is part of a larger regional effort in the Southern California Bight which is part of a natural effort called Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP). The CRWQCB has scheduled a hearing on this proposal for March 25, 1994. Back re ound The Districts have been involved in ocean monitoring and research activities for over 20 years. Some of these activities are mandatory as part of the terms and conditions of our ocean discharge permit issued by the EPA and the CRWQCB. Some of these activities are elective, conducted either on our own or in cooperation with others, principally through our 25-year membership in the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP). We help to fund the applied research that SCCWRP conducts in the area between Point Conception and the Mexican Border called the Southern California Bight. The cost of our monitoring and research efforts, both mandatory and elective, total $2.8 million annually. Our required and elective monitoring and research activities are conducted for one purpose: to understand the impact of the Southern California community on the ocean environment and to knowledgeably determine if our wastewater management program is sufficiently protective of the environment and, if not, to change it accordingly. It has long been our policy not to wait for a federal or state regulatory agency to tell us what to do. Our commitment to environmental protection is to do right thing. The big questions that are continually asked (and answered) are: 1. Is it safe to swim? 2. Is it safe to eat the fish? 3. Are the fisheries adequately protected? 4. Is the ecosystem adequately protected? 1 1 1 r Our efforts are only part of the picture. It is estimated by the National Research Council that over $17 million is spent annually by the various municipal, state, federal and joint powers authorities conducting research and monitoring activities in the Southern California Bight. Our understanding of the ecological conditions of our region is very good. But our understanding is imperfect and the amount of money that is spent every year is, to say the least, somewhat staggering. Through our collective efforts, it has been determined by the Southern California community of ocean monitoring agencies and to outside reviewers (such as the National Research Council), that our programs can be enhanced and, perhaps, should be modified. We need to look at how we sample, analyze, evaluate and computerize the ocean conditions in the Southern California Bight - on a regional basis, not just on a site-specific discharge basis. Unfortunately, evaluation and change is not an easy thing to accomplish. There are technical and institutional barriers that must first be overcome. For instance, because of the years invested in certain monitoring efforts, there is reluctance by some scientists and regulators to make changes that might make it difficult to understand future trends in comparison to past trends if we change our methodology. Also, because agencies such as ours are "locked in" by regulatory requirements to all portions of our mandatory activities, it is virtually impossible to make mid-term corrections to our program while the existing permit is in effect. The Proposed Summer of 1994 Pilot Program All of the operating and regulating agencies who have some authority over the ocean monitoring and research efforts in Southern California have concluded that it's high time to break the log jam and to provide an opportunity to discuss and test the merits of existing and new monitoring techniques and approaches. For this reason, scientists and agency managers from EPA, the California State Water Resources Control Board, the three southern coastal CRWQCB's, SCCWRP and the four large wastewater agencies (City of Los Angeles, County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and the City of San Diego) have been meeting for six months to design a one-time pilot regional ocean monitoring program to be conducted during the summer of 1994 (see attachment). The purpose of the pilot program is to assess new techniques to better understand the ecological conditions of the Southern California Bight. Districts' staff have been involved in the meetings and have exerted a significant amount of leadership as the deliberations have moved forward. The pilot program will be accomplished through a cooperative effort. During the summer, all of the participating agencies will be at sea conducting coordinated sampling and analytical efforts. In effect, the entire Southern California Bight will be linked together in a single overlaying vision. The work will be coordinated by SCCWRP management staff with specific help from EPA and some of the wastewater agencies, including the Districts. To help fund the program, EPA is contributing $500,000. To cover the remaining costs of the program, in excess of $1,000,000, the agencies now conducting monitoring programs will partially offset the cost by conducting modified versions of our normal 2 I summer programs. Agencies such as the Districts will continue a portion of our regularly required monitoring program, but will also divert a portion of our regular efforts toward the support of the summer pilot program. For the Districts' summertime monitoring program, there will be an additional cost of approximately 10% (about $30,000) more than we would have otherwise spent as a result of our participation. There are two reasons for this added cost. The first reason is because the Clean Water Act requires it. The EPA is rigidly restrained from modifying our existing permit obligations, except under one condition. EPA can administratively make a "minor modification" to our permit. A minor modification, according to EPA regulations, is an increase in the monitoring effort required of a permittee. Districts' staff was very insistent on this issue so as not to jeopardize our 301(h) modified NPDES ocean discharge permit. Secondly, this added cost fits in well with our ongoing commitment to research. For fiscal year 1993-94, for instance, we have budgeted $435,000 for research by our ocean research staff and approximately $300,000 by SCCWRP. What's Next? The CRWQCB is conducting a hearing on March 25 to consider public comments regarding the Districts' participation in the Southern California Bight Pilot Project (SCBPP). The CRWQCB has completed a staff report in preparation for the hearing (see attachment). Presentations by the Executive Director of SCCWRP, a representative of EPA, CRWQCB's staff and Districts' staff will be provided at the hearing to describe the technical, regulatory and institutional aspects of the proposed summer program. Through its own mailing list of over 500 individuals, the Districts' list of interested parties and the opportunity for public commentary at the hearing, the CRWQCB will determine if there are members of the public or representatives of public agencies who have suggestions or comments on the proposed program. These issues have been discussed with nearly everyone with a professional interest in ocean monitoring issues for months. However, we have also learned that there may be some concerns expressed by members of the environmental community. (Staff, at this writing, is attempting to determine what the concerns may be.) It is likely that there may be limited adverse public commentary balanced by other individuals voicing their endorsement. The Governing Board of the CRWQCB will take these comments into consideration before deciding whether to adopt their staffs recommendation that the Districts be directed to conduct its monitoring program during the summer of 1994 in accordance with the proposed SCBPP. If this is done, the Districts will insist on a letter from EPA to the Districts also directing us to conduct our summer monitoring program according to the proposed SCBPP to protect our 301(h) NPDES permit. Staff supports the goals, objectives and activities of the SCBPP summer program. It meets our needs for a high quality research program that will, in the long run, provide the information necessary to modify and improve the mandatory portions of our ongoing 3 ocean monitoring program. But in the absence of the procedural efforts of the CRWQCB and the EPA outlined above, we could not participate in the pilot program unless we did it along with everything else in our mandatory program. BPA:ahh REF #410028.RP Attachment 4 CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD SANTA ANA REGION March 25, 1994 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: PARTICIPATION BY THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (CSOOCI IN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT PILOT PROJECT AND A ONE-TIME MINOR MODIFICATION OF THE DISTRICTS' ROUTINE OFFSHORE MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE SUMMER QUARTER, 1994 ABSTRACT: A pilot regional ocean monitoring program has been developed for Southern California. The four major wastewater dischargers (City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, Orange County Sanitation Districts and City of San Diego) will take part, cooperating with USEPA and the three California Regional Water Quality Control Boards. The Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) is managing this monitoring program. The sampling design is the same one used by the national Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP). This pilot project is expected to lead to a permanent, coordinated, regional monitoring program. BACKGROUND: The Southern California Bight (SCB) is the name for the concave area of southern California's coastline extending from Point Conception, above Santa Barbara, to Cabo Colnett, partway down into Baja California. The SCB includes the coast, the offshore islands and the ocean. The prevailing down-coast current forms an eddy as it passes outside the channel islands and the inshore currents reverse and swirl around. Native marine organisms found in the SCB are different from both the coldwater species to the north and the tropical species to the south. A recent survey of discharges to the SCB listed fifteen municipal wastewater treatment plants, eight electrical power generating plants,ten individual industries and eighteen offshore oil platforms. Heavy commercial harbor traffic, several large US Navy installations and about forty thousand private pleasure boats share the SCB. Onshore, there are about fifteen million residents. The point source dischargers which affect the SCB are required to monitor their effluents and the quality of the receiving 4 Staff Report: March 25, 1994 CSDOC Participation in the SCB A7ot Project Page 2 water according to the terms of their National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) ocean discharge permits. The compliance monitoring programs specified in NPDES permits typically concentrate on changes to the local ocean conditions near the points of discharge. They do not address the larger, bight-wide questions of regional importance. They do not meet the needs of resource managers or those interested in the overall health of the local ocean environment. Further, these individual monitoring programs are not regionally coordinated, use somewhat different sampling and analytical metkods, and report according to different schedules. As a result, it is quite difficult to assess overall conditions in the bight. Several times during the past two decades, meetings have been held among the dischargers and regulators to discuss coordinated regional monitoring in the SCB. The National Research Council has also evaluated the issue and recently recommended consistent regional monitoring. A single coordinated program would allow direct comparisons of the effects of different discharges and other anthropogenic activities on the marine environment. Until now, however, bight-wide monitoring efforts have been limited to reference surveys, such as those conducted by the Southern California Coastal Research Project (SCCWRP). As part of the federally-funded Santa Monica Bay Restoration Program, SCCWRP has been reviewing the monitoring programs being carried out in the SCB and has developed recommendations for a regional monitoring program. USEPA Region 9, the City of San Diego, the City of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, Orange County Sanitation Districts, the State Water Resources Control Board and the Los Angeles, Santa Ana and San Diego Regional Boards have also expressed strong interest in, and support for, a coordinated SCB monitoring program. EMAP AND THE SCB PILOT PROJECT Nationally, USEPA has been leading a multi-agency federal effort called the Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP). EMAP is a large-scale national survey of biological resources and environmental information that is steadily expanding its areal coverage. Because of its basic sampling design, EMAP can provide improved numerical estimates of biological and chemical conditions at known levels of statistical confidence. USEPA's original EMAP schedule called for sampling the Pacific Coast in 1995 or 1996 at about 100 stations. Local interest was very strong,however,so USEPA offered support($500,000) for a pilot program in the SCB in 1994. Staff Report: March 25, 1993 CSODC Participation in the SCB Mor Project Page 3 Although EMAP was originally designed with larger areas in mind, the sampling design was readily adapted to the SCB. The present plan includes 275 stations. This pilot project will be the largest regional survey of offshore environmental conditions ever conducted in this part of the country. The SCB pilot project will test the EMAP approach as both a different way to measure compliance and as a measure of the ecological health of the offshore system. The sampling methods and analytical techniques of all the dischargers and contractors will be standardized. EMAP will benefit by expanding its data base to include the deeper waters of the Pacific Coast. The electronic communications systems and analytical capabilities of all the participants will be improved. Overall, the quality of both environmental monitoring and the decision-making based on that monitoring will be improved. THE PROPOSED SCB PILOT PROJECT In addition to the benefits mentioned above, the SCB pilot project will contribute the following overall improvements to our understanding of areawide conditions: 1. This pilot project will cover almost the entire Southern California Bight. The present sampling programs concentrate on the areas around the outfalls and generally do not include those large areas further away. This pilot project will also provide a baseline measurement, against which future changes (major spills, natural disasters, etc., as well as improvements) can be compared. 2. Conclusions drawn about conditions in the SCB will be statistically unbiased. Because the sample sites for this pilot project were chosen randomly, the confidence interval around any value can be calculated.This contrasts with the existing programs, where sample sites are preselected and laid out in patterns, biasing the conclusions. 3. The sampling design of this program allows us to calculate the size of the areas of the bight that are affected by various factors, including wastewater discharge. Conventional monitoring usually tells us the average condition in the immediate area sampled, but this pilot program will allow us to compare the entire SCB area with any numeric water quality value. This sampling approach allows us to calculate the size of any area at any level of effect. 4. The assessment of the ecological condition of the SCB will be based, for the most part, on analyses of the benthic (ocean bottom) community. Benthic organisms are used because they live a fairly long time and are relatively immobile. The numbers and kinds of benthic organisms in an area reflect the local conditions, including Staff Report: March 25, 1994 CSDOC Participation in the SCS Pilot Project Page 4 adverse influences such as toxics, and beneficial influences like readily available food. The benthic community also reflects the recent history of conditions in the area. Sampling Design and Layout The EMAP approach is to lay a hexagonal grid (like some tile patterns) over the area to be sampled. One site is then randomly chosen from within each hexagon. In areas of particular interest, sampling density can be increased by making the hexagons smaller. This does not bias the results, however, because smaller areas are associated with each of these sample points in the denser grid. The design of the SCB pilot project and the locations of the sample sites will allow us to make the following direct comparisons. 1. How do the northern third (Santa Barbara to Malibu), the middle third (Malibu to Dana Point) and the southern third (Dana Point to Mexico) of the SCB compare to each other? 2. How do the shallow (less than 10 meters, about 33 feet), mid-depth and deep (more than 100 meters, about 330 feet) areas of the coastal shelf compare to each other? 3. How do the areas around the four large wastewater outfalls (Hyperion, Los Angeles County, Orange County and San Diego) compare to the rest of the SCB? 4. How do the areas around the large river mouths and other stormwater discharges compare to the rest of the SCB? 5. How does Santa Monica Bay compare to the rest of the SCB? 6. How does the area around the Hyperion outfall compare with other areas in Santa Monica Bay? With other parts of the SCB? Number of Samples There are 275 sampling sites in the proposed SCB pilot project, locally spaced to allow the comparisons listed above. Because of the limitations of time, money and staffing, the number of 'indicators" (see below) measured at different stations will vary. Two categories of sampling and measurement - those involving fish and those aimed at measuring the bioaccumulation of toxic materials - will be pursued at fewer stations. There will be 145 fish sampling sites and 85 bioaccumulation sample sites. Staff Report: March 25, 1994 CSDOC Participation in the SCB Pilot Project Page 5 There are twelve "indicators" that will be measured to answer the six comparison questions listed above. This list was developed after consultation with scientists from the regulatory agencies, dischargers and the environmental community. 1. Benthic assemblages 2. Sediment contamination 3. Dissolved oxygen 4. Temperature 5. Salinity 5. Light transmissivity 7. Sediment characteristics S. Marine debris 9. Fish assemblages 10. Fish gross pathology 11. Fish bioaccumulation 12. Sediment toxicity COMBINING THE SCB PILOT PROJECT AND CSDOC's MONITORING PROGRAM In the process of designing the SCB pilot project, SCCWRP proposed that a large part of the routine monitoring efforts of the four large dischargers might.be redirected, for one time only, to help support this pilot project. EPA 9 and the staff of the three regional boards supported that proposal. SCCWRP also suggested that the four cooperating dischargers might want to save 15 to 20% of their regular compliance monitoring programs to preserve the continuity of the data. Some dischargers indicated that they would prefer to concentrate completely on the SCB pilot project sampling this summer. CSDOC submitted a letter proposal titled "SCBPP - Districts' Proposed Sampling Effort" (Attachment 4), describing a combination of a sharply reduced number of routine stations with SCB pilot program sampling. Details of the final monitoring program proposed for the summer quarter may change as various details are worked out, but the description below should be fairly accurate. The staff of the Regional Board has reviewed CSDOC's proposed sampling plan and supports the Districts' proposal as a balanced approach that continues to monitor the most important routine elements while also actively participating in the proposed regional monitoring program. Five kinds of sampling and testing are included in the existing CSDOC offshore monitoring program specified in Regional Board Order 84-1. For the summer 1994 monitoring program, the Regional Board staff proposes that the monitoring program be modified as described below. Staff Report: - March 25, 1994 ' CSDOC Participation in the SCB Riot Project _ Page 6 1. Water Quality: Water quality monitoring measures the effect of CSDOC's wastewater on the physical and chemical quality of the ocean water in the area. Recording probes and sensors are lowered down through the water to the bottom, measuring conductivity, temperature and depth (hence, "CTD"), as well as light transmissivity, pH and dissolved oxygen in the area of the discharge. CSDOC routinely collects water samples at various depths and analyzes them for ammonia, suspended solids, fecal coliform bacteria, and oil and grease. Visual observations are also made for debris, water color and water clarity. During the summer quarter, CSDOC normally does 35 CTD casts and about 1100 chemical and bacteriological analyses in the water column. CSDOC's proposal suggests dropping the total suspended solids and the oil and grease analyses, since those tests have not provided any useful data thus far. The Regional Board staff agrees with that assessment. The CSDOC proposal suggests that 12 CTD casts and 360 total analyses be retained. The SCB pilot program includes only CTD casts - no collecting or analyzing samples. CSDOC proposes to add the 12 SCB pilot project stations in the area of their outfall plus 21 other nearby stations, for a total of 33 additional CTD stations. 2. Sediment Chemistry: Sediment chemistry monitoring measures the effect of the discharge on the chemical quality of the bottom sediments. Grabs of the bottom material are collected and taken back to the laboratory for analysis. Levels of toxic heavy metals, organics and other priority pollutants are measured. CSDOC would normally collect three replicate grabs at each of thirteen stations, plus single grabs at forty other stations, for a total of 79 samples. They propose instead to do three replicate grabs at three representative existing stations plus single grabs from 14 more existing stations, a total 23 grab samples. In addition, CSDOC proposes to collect 33 grab samples 0 per station) for the SCB pilot project, a total of 56 grabs. 3. Benthic Infauna: Monitoring of the benthic infauna measures the effect of the discharge on the numbers and kinds of organisms living in the bottom sediments (the "infaunal benthic community") in the area of the outfali. Grabs of the bottom sediment are collected, screened and washed, and the organisms preserved for later identification, counting and weighing in the laboratory. The normal summer program includes analyzing five replicate grabs from each of 13 stations plus 40 other single grabs - 105 grabs total. CSDOC proposes to collect three replicates each from three stations, plus 14 other single grabs (23 total) from their regular stations. In addition, they would collect 33 SCB pilot project grabs, a total of 56 grabs. Staff Report., March 25, 1994 CSDOC Participation in the SCB Pilot project page 7 4. Trawl Fish, Trawl Invertebrates and Fish Chemistry: Trawling monitors the effect of the discharge on the numbers and kinds of larger organisms on or near the bottom (the "epibenthic community") around the outfall. Trawl nets are dragged along the bottom at established sampling sites, collecting fish, large invertebrates and debris. Fish and some of the invertebrates are measured, weighed and inspected for disease, and samples of liver or flesh are collected for tissue chemistry and microscopic examination. The normal CSDOC summer quarter program includes two replicate trawls at each of eight stations - 16 trawls. Up to 60 samples, depending on how many fish are caught, are then taken for tissue analysis. CSDOC proposes to trawl one time at each of two of its normal stations. From the catch from those two trawls, CSDOC proposes to collect and analyze nine tissue samples. In addition, they would trawl at 15 SCB pilot project stations and collect and analyze 51 samples. The total effort would be 17 trawls and 60 samples. PROPOSED SUMMARY OF THE CSDOC SAMPLING PROGRAM IN SUPPORT OF THE SCB PILOT PROJECT PROGRAM NORMAL, PORTION PLUS SCB TOTAL ELEMENT EFFORT RETAINED PROGRAM SAMPLING Water Quality 35 CTDs + 12 CTDs + 33 CTDs 45 CTDs + 1101 360 samples 360 samples samples Sediment 79 grabs 23 grabs from 33 grabs from 56 grabs from Chemistry from 53 17 stations 33 stations 50 stations stations Benthic 105 grabs 23 grabs from 33 grabs from 56 grabs from Infauna from 53 17 stations 33 stations 50 stations stations Bottom Fish 16 trawls at 2 trawls at 2 15 trawls at 17 trawls at & "Inverts" 8 stations + stations + 9 15 stations + 17 stations + and Tissues 60 samples samples 51 samples 60 samples Staff Report. March 25, 1994 CSDOC Participation in the SCB Hiot Project Page 8 The samples collected for the SCB pilot project will be handled differently in some cases, utilizing different procedures, different methods and different data sheets. Cost savings and efficiencies gained through years of repetition may be lost for the summer, but this temporary disadvantage will be offset by the experience gained participating in this pilot program. In addition, CSDOC's regular sampling sites are clustered together in a relatively small area, whereas the SCB pilot project stations are spread out over a much larger area, extending as far south as Dana Point and as far north as Anaheim Bay. As a result of these differences, the numbers shown in the "Total Sampling" column above may be smaller than those under "Normal Effort," yet represent 110% of the expense and effort of CSDOC's normal summer monitoring. THE ISSUE OF REGULATORY RELIEF When serious discussions about the SCB pilot program first began, CSDOC responded to the question of whether they would participate or not in two different ways. They expressed strong technical and scientific support for the proposal, both the concept and the details, indicating that they would do everything possible to assure the success of the pilot project. While some other dischargers voiced concern about the possibility that EMAP might require more resources than routine summer quarter monitoring would, CSDOC staff suggested that their agency might be willing to commit as much as 110% of their normal expenditures. At the same time, CSDOC made it clear that they would not do anything that might jeopardize either the status of their 301(h) NPDES permit or their application for permit renewal. CSDOC's involvement would have to be at the explicit direction of the regulatory agencies. To assure that the public is aware of what CSDOC's participation in the SCB pilot program means and to establish that there are no serious objections by the public, the Regional Board has arranged a public hearing on the matter. All organizations and individuals known orthoughtto be interested have been notified of this hearing (public notice and contact list attached). Those who requested more information were sent copies of this staff report and attachments. None of the other three major municipal dischargers involved in the SCB pilot project is operating under an expired 301(h) permit that has been administratively extended by EPA. Modification of the monitoring programs of the other three dischargers to accommodate the SCB pilot project is comparatively simple, and is being coordinated by USEPA and the Regional Boards that regulate each of them. e Staff Report: March 25, 1994 CSDOC PerUdpetion in the SCa Pilot Project Page 9 In the absence of significant public objection and contingent upon approval of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, CSDOC will be directed, by letter, to take part in the SCB pilot project in lieu of conducting the normal summer quarter offshore monitoring program described in the districts' waste discharge requirements (Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 84-001). Under California law, changes can be made to a discharger's monitoring program at the direction of the Executive Officer. The Regional Board and Region 9 of USEPA jointly issued CSDOC's NPDES permit (No. CA0110604) under Section 301(h) of the federal Clean Water Act. USEPA Region 9 has indicated that they also support this one-time modification to the CSDOC permit, and will provide_a letter to CSDOC to that effect. RECOMMENDATION Direct the Executive Officer to formally notify CSDOC that they (a) are to forgo normal summer quarter offshore ocean monitoring and are to substitute that portion of the regular monitoring program specified in the proposal dated January 7, 1994 and (b) are to take part in the SCB pilot project, conducting the monitoring specified in the SCB pilot project work plan and assigned to CSDOC by SCCWRP. Attachments: i. Notice of Public Hearing, Proposed Change to CSDOC Monitoring Program 2. Contact and Mailing List, CSDOC 3011h) Permit Issues 3. The Southern California Bight Pilot Project Technical Proposal (SCBPP), Submitted to USEPA by the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, December 1993 4. Letter from County Sanitation Districts of Orange County to the Regional Board: SCBPP - Districts' Proposed Sampling Effort, January 7, 1994 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING THE SANTA ANA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD PROPOSES TO DIRECT THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT PILOT PROJECT MONITORING PROGRAM AND TO CARRY OUT A MODIFIED VERSION OF ITS SUMMER QUARTER OFFSHORE MONITORING PROGRAM. THE REGIONAL BOARD WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE AND CONSIDER TESTIMONY CONCERNING THIS PROPOSAL, AS FOLLOWS. DATE: MARCH 25, 1994 TIME: 9:30 AM PLACE: ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 10500 ELUS AVE., FOUNTAIN VALLEY JOINT FACILITIES BOARD ROOM —-----------------------—----------------------------------_----------- The Southern California Bight (SCB) is developed a pilot project patterned after a the indented portion of the Pacific coastline national data collection effort called the extending from Point Conception, west of Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Santa Barbara, to a point south of the Program (EMAP), which includes both on- Mexican border. Numerous wastewater and offshore monitoring. In response to discharges are made to the SCB; the the strong showing of local interest in largest are those of the City of Los regional marine monitoring, EMAP has Angeles, Los Angeles County, Orange provided partial funding for a local pilot County and San Diego. The effects of program scheduled for summer 1994. The these discharges on the marine balance of the necessary support is to - environment are now being independently come from redirection of the summer and separately monitored by the monitoring programs of the major discharging agencies. dischargers. SCCWRP has agreed to EPA-Region 9 and the coastal Regional organize and manage the local resources Water Quality Control Boards, which and efforts. specify these individual monitoring The SCB pilot project currently programs, recognize the need for a regional represents a one-time, coordinated, bight- monitoring approach to better =_s�ess the wide effort, which is expected to serve as areawide and cumulative impacts of these the model for a longer-term regional marine wastewater discharges. A prototype monitoring program, and for some regional monitoring program is being dischargers, as a transitional step to the developed by the Southern California regional program. Sampling locations have Coastal Water Research Project(SCCWRP) been established according to EMAP's for Santa Monica Bay as part of the Santa statistically-based grid system. The routine Monica Bay Restoration Program. monitoring programs of each of the four On a larger, bight-wide scale, EPA-9, major ocean dischargers would be the Santa Ana, Los Angeles and San Diego converted to wider-scale programs so that Regional Water Quality Control Boards,the each represents a discrete part of the State Water Resources Control Board, the regional program. The dischargers would Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project and use common methods and equipment, and SCCWRP have jointly .and cooperatively would monitor according to a single, EPA-9 has indicated that they would coordinated schedule. consider this one-time change in the To date, the marine monitoring monitoring program a minor modification. programs of the major coastal dischargers Other than these one-time have focused on the areas close to the substitutions to the monitoring program, no points of discharge. There is a growing other changes to the permit are being consensus in the scientific and regulatory considered at this time. community, however, that a better Substituting CSDOC's part of the SCB understanding of the general conditions in pilot program for a large part of the regular the SCB should be developed. As summer quarter marine monitoring designed, the SCB pilot program includes specified in their permit will have no effect fewer stations close to the points of on the quality of the wastewater discharge and a greater number of more discharged, and therefore, no effect on evenly-distributed stations between the public health or the environment. The discharges. In addition, stations have been changes in the offshore monitoring are added near the major river mouths to expected to be in best interests of both the assess the impacts of stormwater public and the environment. The RWQCB discharges, and in Santa Monica Bay, to is aware, however, of how interested the more accurately assess conditions in the public is in the quality of the local ocean bay. environment, and is offering this The County Sanitation Districts of opportunity to comment on the RWQCB's Orange County (CSDOC) operate under proposed action. Testimony can respond Waste Discharge Requirements included in to the following questions, or can address Order No. 84-1, issued by the Santa Ana other relevant issues. Regional Water Quality Control Board Should the Regional Water Quality (RWQCB), and under a National Pollutant Control Board direct CSDOC to suspend a Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) large. part of its normal 1994 summer permit issued jointly in 1985 with USEPA quarter sampling program and carry out Region S. The NPDES permit incorporates part of the SCB pilot program instead? a waiver from the requirement for full Are there significant public concerns secondary treatment under Section 301(h) related to the existing CSDOC ocean of the Clean Water Act. As a condition of monitoring program or the SCB pilot the permit, CSDOC is required to carry out program that would preclude CSDOC's a marine monitoring program that is both proceeding with the SCB pilot program more extensive and more detailed than that sampling? required of other large coastal dischargers. If you know of any other individuals or The Regional Board is propozing to have organizations that might also be interested CSDOC substitute a portion of the SCB in these issues, please feel free to pass this pilot project for most of the normal summer information along. If you have any quarter offshore monitoring program. questions about this hearing, matters to be Bacteriological monitoring of the surf zone discussed, or if you need any additional and the coastline would continue as before, information, please contact Gordon unaffected by these actions. Anderson of Regional Board staff. His The monitoring programs ordinarily telephone number is (909) 782-4329. included with Waste Discharge Requirements can be easily changed by _ Regional Boards as needed. In m, the sI terminology of the NPDES progra these �c�X changes are considered "minor . . Ge r J. Thibeault modifications." In the case of CSDOC, Executive Officer February 23, 1994 February 22, 1994 ATTACHMENT 2 CONTACT AND MAILING LIST Telephone Contacts: Michael Lyons CRWQCB #4--LA area contacts Mark Gold Heal the Bay--Left voicemail message Use Weill American Oceans Campaign Michael Fitts NRDC Jack Skinner SPON Dr. Irwin Haydock CSDOC Terry Fleming EPA-Region 9 February 23, 1994 Public Hearing Notice: To Regional Board Agenda Mailing List--550+ names February 28, 1994 Staff Report Mailing List: Mark Gold Dennis Kelly, Ph.D. Ms. Jan Stull Heal the Bay Marine Science Dept. CSD-LA 1640 5th St., Ste. 204 Orange Coast College PO Box 4998 Santa Monica, CA 90401 2701 Fairview Road Whittier, CA 90607 (310) 3944552x 119 Costa Mesa, CA 92628- 0120 John K. Mitchell Use Weill (714) 432-5564 Environmental Engineering American Oceans Campaign 707 Lomita Street 725 Arizona Ave., # 102 Sierra Club, Orange County El Segundo, CA 90245 Santa Monica CA 90401 PO Box 5367 (3101 576-6162 Fullerton, CA 92635 Ms. Patricia Vainik (714) 997-2220 Pt. Loma Wastewater Michael Fitts City of San Diego National Resources Defense Audobon Society, Sea and 4077 North Harbor Dr. Council Sage Son Diego, CA 92101 6310 San Vicente Blvd. St PO Box 25 250 Santa Ana, CA 92702 Dr. John Dorsey Los Angeles, CA 90048 Hyperion Lob Manager (213) 934-6900 Teri Schulz City of Los Angeles Administrative Director 12000 Vista del Mar Jack Skinner, M.D. Surfrider Foundation Plays del Rey, CA 90291 SPON 105 Avenida de Is Estrella 1724 Highland Drive San Clemente, CA 92672 Mark Helvey Newport Beach, CA 92660 (714) 492-8170 NMFS (714) 646-8635 501 W. Ocean Blvd. Alan J. Mearns, Ph.D. Long Beach, CA 90802 Gordon LeBetz, M.D. NOAA-Office of Marine Surfriders, Seal Beach Pollution Abatement Dr. Rainer Hoenike 339 Regatta Way 7600 Sand Point Way, N.E. SMBRP Seal Beach, CA 90740 Seattle, WA 98115 101 Centre Plaza Drive (310) 598-0230 Monterey Park, CA 91754 J. Hashimoto/Terry Fleming EPA-IX B. Anderson/I.Haydock CSDOC Michael Lyons CRWQCB #4 Bruce Posthumous CRWQCB p9 Monica Mazur OCHCA Harbors Beaches and Parks OCEMA Craig Wilson BPTCP SWRCB City of Newport Beach City of Huntington Beach City of Seal Beach Bill Paznokas CDF&G-San Diego Dr. Jeff Cross SCCWRP 'i THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT PILOT PROJECT TECHNICAL PROPOSAL Prepared for: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Prepared by: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I K Bureau of Sanitation, City of Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Department of Water Utilities, City of San Diego Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board California State Water Resources Control Board Southern California Coastal Water Research Project December 1993 f TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Background and Rationale for the Project 1 B. Purpose of the Proposed Project 3 C. Anticipated Benefits 5 II. TECHNICAL APPROACH FOR ASSESSMENT 8 A. Overview of Approach 8 B. Sampling Design 10 C. Sample Collection Methods 11 D. Sample Processing Methods 12 E. Data Analysis and Interpretation 13 III. INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 20 A. Overview of Approach 20 B. System Description 20 C. Database Development 20 D. Field Computer System 21 IV. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 21 A. Introduction 21 B. General Approach to Quality Assurance 22 C. Measurement Quality Objectives 23 D. Quality Assurance Activities 23 E. Quality Control Activities 26 F. Quality Assurance for Information Management 27 V. PROJECT MANAGEMENT 33 VI. PROJECT BUDGET 37 t f Table of Contents (continued) VII. LITERATURE CITED 41 APPENDIX A.LOCATION OF PROPOSED SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES FOR BASE DESIGN APPENDIX B: COORDINATES OF PROPOSED SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES BASE DESIGN APPENDIX C: LOCATION OF PROPOSED SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES FOR FISH DESIGN APPENDIX D: COORDINATES OF PROPOSED SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES FOR FISH DESIGN f I. INTRODUCTION A. BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE FOR THE PROJECT The Southern California Bight (SCB; Figure I-1) is an important and unique ecological resource. Pelagic and benthic fishes and invertebrates are abundant in the coastal waters. The mainland shelf is also an important migratory route and foraging area for many marine mammals and birds, including at least three endangered bird species. More than 500 species of fish and 1,500 species of invertebrates occur in the Southern California Bight, which is the northern end of the San Diego Biogeographic Province (Briggs 1974). Shallow-water organisms in the bight are warm-temperate species whereas those north of Point Conception (and on the outer islands in the bight) are cold-temperate species of the Oregonian Province. Many of the species typical of Southern California are seldom found north of Point Conception. The mainland shelf is an important economic resource. It is used for recreation (boating, diving, swimming, surfing), commercial and recreational fisheries, municipal and industrial wastewater discharge, oil extraction, and ship traffic (NRC 1990a). Fifteen municipal wastewater treatment facilities, 8 power generating stations, 10 industrial treatment facilities, and 18 oil platforms discharge to the open coast (California State Water Resources Control Board 1991, unpubl. data). Los Angeles/Long Beach Harbors are among the busiest commercial ports in the world. San Diego Harbor has one of the largest U.S. Naval facilities in the country. About 40,000 pleasure boats are docked in 13 coastal marinas (NRC 1990a). Commercial fishing is focused on pelagic fishes and hard-bottom shellfish. Recreational fishing targets seasonally abundant pelagic game fish, resident nearshore fishes, and deepwater rockfish. The SCB is a large eddy that extends from Point Conception, California, to Cape Colnett, Baja California, Mexico. It is bounded offshore by the main flow of the California Current and the Patton Escarpment, a submerged ridge that is the outer boundary of the Southern California Continental Borderland. The borderland consists of offshore islands, banks, ridges, submarine canyons, deep basins, and a narrow mainland shelf, which averages about 3 km in width (ranging from 1 to 20 km) (Emery 1960). Elsewhere in the United States, the shelf may be 10 to 200 times wider. The narrowness of the mainland shelf off Southern California makes it particularly susceptible to the effects of human activities. Nearly 15 million people live in coastal Southern California (NRC 1990a). The population has increased 36% (4 million) since the early 1970s and is expected to increase by about 20% (3 million) by 2010 (SCCWRP 1973, NRC 1990a). About 73°% of the population is concentrated along the central coast in Los Angeles and Orange counties; most of the remaining population occurs in the San Diego-Tijuana area to the south (Hoffman et al. 1992). 0 Local, state, and federal agencies monitor the status and trends of environmental quality and natural resources of the mainland shelf in the SCB. The municipal, power plant, and industrial dischargers are required to monitor their effluent and the receiving waters in accordance with National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits issued by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region IX, the Regional Water Quality Control Boards, or both. These permits require the discharger to comply with the California Ocean Plan and the Federal Clean Water Act, which set water quality standards for effluent and receiving waters. The dischargers conduct monitoring programs to assess compliance with their permits. These assessments are documented quarterly by each discharger. Although these compliance monitoring programs provide useful information, they address small-scale, discrete questions, not bightwide questions of regional interest. The sampling designs, parameters, methods, sampling frequency, and QA protocols for the compliance monitoring programs differ significantly among the dischargers. Even if the data from these programs were integrated, they are not sufficient to provide a regional assessment of environmental quality. Compliance monitoring programs do not meet all of the needs of resource managers who must develop management strategies for the SCB. Integrated regional status and trends monitoring in the SCB would enable resource managers to assess the cumulative effects of anthropogenic inputs to the mainland shelf. Recent reports by the National Research Council (NRC 1990a,b) laid the foundation for development of a regional monitoring program for the SCB by pointing out the lack of standardized sampling methods, survey designs, and reporting requirements. Development of regional monitoring would also encourage participating agencies to adopt common sampling design and methods, which would facilitate comparisons among the many programs in the region. Resource managers would have the data to evaluate the relative influence of the various anthropogenic inputs to the region. Ultimately, this would allow resource managers to select the most cost-effective management strategies. The mainland shelf off Southern California has been monitored for more than 20 years and there is a history of cooperative surveys among participating organizations. However, the level of interest in regional monitoring and the spirit of cooperation in Southern California are higher now than at any time in the past two decades. The U.S. EPA Region IX; the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); the Los Angeles, Santa Ana, and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Boards; and the member agencies of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) have been exploring ways to develop a regional monitoring program. SCCWRP conducted several regional reference surveys (Word and Mearns 1979, Thompson et al. 1987, 1992) at the request of the municipal wastewater dischargers. SCCWRP also initiated efforts in 1993 to standardize monitoring methods in the SCB. The Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project (SMBRP), part of U.S. EPA's National Estuary Program, is exploring ways to develop a comprehensive monitoring program for Santa Monica Bay. To achieve the full benefit of this spirit of cooperation, these activities must be coordinated and integrated around a set of clearly defined management objectives and monitoring questions. EPA's Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) provides a framework for establishing regional monitoring in the SCB. EMAP is a national, interagency monitoring program that measures biological responses to environmental stress in terrestrial, aquatic, and marine ecosystems, including estuaries and near-coastal systems. The probability-based sampling design and standardized methods developed for EMAP can provide estimates of ecological status and trends in a region with known statistical confidence. Although EMAP was developed to address management questions on national and large regional scales, its flexible sampling design can be applied to smaller regions like the SCB. In addition, EMAP's emphasis on interagency participation encourages cooperation among the local, state, and federal monitoring programs operating within a region and results in improved data and reduced cost for all participants. According to EPA's original plans, EMAP activity on the West Coast would begin in 1995 or 1996 with sampling in the estuaries and coastal waters of the California Province (Cape Mendicino to Baja California). The EMAP sampling design would include 100 samples in the province with approximately 50 samples in the SCB. The need for and interest in regional monitoring expressed by environmental managers and dischargers in Southern California suggests that it is timely and useful for EMAP to begin its activity on the West Coast earlier. By coordinating and building upon regional interest and effort, EMAP will have an opportunity to test its design and indicators in an open coastal system at a higher level of effort than originally planned. In addition, the agencies in Southern California will be assisted in their efforts to coordinate and integrate monitoring in the SCB to produce more useful and cost-effective data. The proposed Southern California Pilot Project will be the largest regional survey of environmental conditions attempted on the mainland shelf in the SCB. It will capitalize on the interest and cooperation existing in Southern California and leverage the available resources to develop an integrated and coordinated regional monitoring program that addresses the needs of local, state, and federal agencies. B. PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed Southern California Bight Pilot Project (SCBPP) will apply EMAP assessment approaches to provide synoptic information about the ecological condition of reference, treated wastewater and nonpoint discharge areas on the mainland shelf. The SCBPP will evaluate the EMAP assessment approach as an alternative design for compliance monitoring programs. The SCBPP will also test i EMAP indicators in an open coastal environment and will test indicators specific to the SCB that have not been used in EMAP studies to date. The SCBPP will include three major parts: 1) An assessment of the current environmental status of the mainland shelf in the Southern California Bight; 2)An evaluation of a demonstration compliance monitoring program based on EMAP assessment methods; and 3)An evaluation of indicators and elements of EMAP sampling design for use in the nearshore and offshore marine environments. The first element in the SCBPP will provide information to support management decisions for allocating resources and for controlling pollution and its effects in the Southern California Bight. It will address the following questions: 1) What is the extent and magnitude of ecological change on the mainland shelf in the Southern California Bight? 2) Is the degree of change similar throughout the Southern California Bight, or is it more severe in particular areas? 3) Can the change be associated with identifiable sources of pollution, such as municipal outfalls, rivers, or harbors? Are the associations the same throughout the Southern California Bight? If not, what associations are most important in each area? The second element of the SCBPP also will contribute to management decision-malting by determining whether a compliance monitoring program based on EMAP methods would be more efficient and provide better information than existing monitoring programs. The demonstration compliance monitoring program will compare data from an EMAP survey design with data collected from an existing compliance monitoring program. This study will help managers determine whether the EMAP approach can be incorporated into compliance monitoring programs and whether compliance monitoring data can be comparable to data from bightwide surveys. The thud element of the SCBPP will evaluate EMAP and Southern California indicators and the applicability of the EMAP survey design to an open coastal environment. Several EMAP indicators developed for use in Atlantic estuaries will be tested for effectiveness on the mainland shelf in the Southern I 5 California Bight and compared to measures used in local NPDES marine monitoring programs. C. ANTICIPATED BENEFITS OF THE PROJECT The SCBPP will be a collaborative effort between EMAP, EPA Region D{; the California State Water Resources Control Board; the Los Angeles, Santa Ana, and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Boards; the Environmental Monitoring Division of the City of Los Angeles; County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County; County Sanitation Districts of Orange County; Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Facility of the City of San Diego; the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project; and the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project (U.S. EPA National Estuary Program). The primary beneficiaries of the SCBPP will be the environmental managers and scientists of the cities and counties of Southern California, the state of California, EPA Region IX, and U.S. EPA. The SCBPP will provide the fast opportunity for environmental managers and scientists to design and implement regional monitoring in the Southern California Bight, and test a new approach to compliance monitoring. The SCBPP will evaluate the EMAP approach as the potential framework for a regional monitoring program that coordinates, integrates, and standardizes existing NPDES compliance monitoring programs among the publically-owned treatment works (POTWs). The data produced by the SCBPP will be valuable to the municipal wastewater dischargers and to the environmental managers of the regulatory agencies. The municipal wastewater dischargers regularly compare the results of their compliance monitoring to reference conditions in the Southern California Bight. The SCBPP will be the largest probability-based survey of the mainland shelf in Southern California in the last three decades and will provide unbiased information with which to assess outfall and reference conditions. Analyses of the data produced by the SCBPP will also help to identify management priorities, suggest appropriate strategies for addressing environmental problems, and provide statistically rigorous baseline information about water and sediment quality for measuring the effects of management actions. The SCBPP will provide a basis for implementing a comprehensive monitoring program for Santa Monica Bay. The Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project is required to develop a monitoring program as part of their Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan. The study design, indicator evaluations, protocol development, Q,A procedures, and information database used in the SCBPP, as well as the cooperation among participating agencies, will help in developing the SMBRP monitoring program and ensure that it is compatible with a larger, bightwide monitoring program. 6 EMAP will gain short-term and long-term benefits from the SCBPP. In the short-term, EMAP will benefit from early testing and development of new indicators designed specifically for the near-coastal environment. EMAP will also benefit from lessons learned through the SCBPP about operating in an open coastal environment with unique deep-water logistical and pollution concerns. In the long-term, the SCBPP's intensification of EMAP-type sampling in the SCB will provide more data and increased confidence in provincewide estimates for the California Province. EMAP will also derive long-term benefits from cooperating with organizations that have more than 20 years of experience in monitoring the mainland shelf off Southern California. The data, information, and experience available from participating in the SCBPP will facilitate development of new EMAP programs for other coastal marine provinces. A secondary benefit of the SCBPP will be data-sharing, communication,and an integrated approach to ecosystem monitoring. The proposed study has already been effective in establishing communication among the participants regarding research objectives, design approaches, study methods, indicator development, quality assurance protocols, and information management. The SCBPP will stimulate and strengthen cooperation among the participating monitoring and research agencies. It will improve environmental monitoring, research, and decision-making in the Southern California Bight. 7 FIGURE I-1. Map of the Southern California Bight. Surface Circulation \ \° of • Point Conception the Southern California Bight o ice: f y� 34 •�'•"••: �\����1 "'• ,.. Palos Verdes PeninsNa a�? a.� 1.1 San Diego Southern Cali ornia� - Countercurr -nt J Ij o � ` Ensenada !4k`% ; �;. San 100 r w 7 •'.;I r - i Ian y 30° L!�..3oo0m ,2oo0m2oom .: 122° 120° 1180 1160 8 , H. TECHNICAL APPROACH FOR ASSESSMENT A. OVERVIEW OF APPROACH The goal of the Southern California Bight Pilot Project (SCBPP) is to develop and implement an integrated, coordinated regional environmental monitoring program. The SCBPP will provide synoptic information about the ecological condition of the mainland shelf in the Southern California Bight (SCB), and it will evaluate the utility of the EMAP assessment approach as an alternative design for compliance monitoring programs. The proposed program will improve upon present monitoring efforts in the SCB in three ways. First, it will provide estimates of ecological condition for all areas of the bight. Present POTW monitoring efforts are spatially limited; some areas are sampled intensively, while large expanses are not sampled at all. Developing an effective management strategy for the SCB (as opposed to addressing site specific problems) requires an understanding of the extent and distribution of environmental modification throughout the bight. Regional monitoring in the bight will provide that information. Regional monitoring will also provide a baseline against which to assess the effects of specific point sources or unanticipated future contamination (e.g., oil or hazardous material spills). Second, the data will be collected using a probability-based sampling design. This design will ensure unbiased estimation of ecological condition, which is not possible when sampling sites are preselected, as in the present POTW monitoring efforts in the bight. The probability-based sampling design also allows investigators to calculate confidence intervals around estimates of condition. Confidence intervals provide managers with full knowledge of the strengths or weaknesses of the data upon which their decisions will be based. Another advantage of the probability-based sampling design is that it allows investigators to estimate the area (i.e., number of hectares) of the system in which ecological conditions differ from reference areas. This is the primary goal of the SCBPP. The emphasis on estimating areal extent departs from traditional approaches to environmental monitoring, which generally estimate the average condition. Estimating the areal extent of modified ecological condition offers several advantages. First, it provides a more direct assessment of current status. For example, identifying that the average concentration of dissolved oxygen in the bight is 5.7 ppm provides less usable information for environmental managers than does identifying that 12% of the bight fails to meet water quality standards. A second advantage of estimating areal extent concerns the detection of trends. If conditions in the bight change over time such that some areas improve and others worsen, the average condition might not change. By estimating the areal extent of modification, however, it is possible to develop an area-weighted distribution 9 function that highlights changes in the distribution of altered environmental conditions rather than obscuring them. The third improvement associated with the proposed project is that the SCBPP will use a uniform set of indicators and sampling methods throughout the SCB. The probability-based sampling design provides a framework for integrating data into a comprehensive regional assessment; however, the validity of such an assessment depends on ensuring that all of the data that contribute to it are comparable. To ensure that each participant in the SCBPP who collects and processes samples will produce comparable data, the SCBPP will develop and document standard field and laboratory methods and quality assurance protocols to be used by all participants. Developing standard methods manuals for regional monitoring in the SCB will not only ensure that all data collected for the SCBPP can be integrated, but also provide a framework upon which to build further monitoring efforts. Specifically, the success of the SCBPP will provide a framework for implementing regional monitoring in the Southern California Bight and EMAP in the Californian Province. The assessment of ecological conditions in the SCB will be based largely on the bottom-dwelling, or benthic, community. The condition will be measured by a common group of indicators (Table II-1). The characteristics of the benthic community or assemblage are reliable indicators of ecological condition in the SCB (Thompson et al. 1987, 1992). Benthic organisms are relatively sedentary and cannot easily escape adverse conditions (Gray 1982); therefore benthic assemblages are good indicators of local conditions. Benthic assemblages are taxonomically and trophically diverse. Individuals within these assemblages have a wide range of physiological tolerances and respond to multiple types of stress (Pearson and Rosenberg 1978, Boesch and Rosenberg 1981). The life span of benthic organisms is sufficiently long for assemblages to display population and community level responses to environmental stress. Benthic assemblages integrate environmental conditions that existed during the weeks and months before sampling. Such integrated information about ecological condition cannot be obtained from point samples of water quality. The SCBPP will collect measures of habitat, contaminant exposure, and biological response. Collecting measurements of contaminant exposure with measurements of biological response allows investigators to identify statistical associations between altered ecological conditions and particular environmental stresses. Although statistical associations do not conclusively identify the cause of the response, associations are valuable for establishing priorities for further investigations. The statistical associations may also contribute to developing efficient regional strategies for protecting or improving the environment by identifying the predominant types of stress in the system. B. SAMPLING DESIGN The sampling design proposed for this project is based on the EMAP protocol presently used for sampling the estuarine habitat of the Louisianian Province. Using this design, a hexagonal grid is placed randomly over a map of the sampling area, and one sample is obtained at a randomly selected site within each grid cell. The hexagonal grid structure ensures systematic separation of the sites, maximizing the ability to develop spatial statistics (e.g., kriging). Selecting sites randomly within hexagons ensures an unbiased estimate of condition. The sampling design is flexible to enhancement so that greater sample density can be achieved in subpopulations of interest. The SCBPP identified six subpopulations of primary interest: 1) Three geographic zones of the bight: northern (Pt. Conception to Pt. Dome), central (Pt. Dome to Dana PtJ, and southern (Dana Pt. to Mexico); 2) Three depth zones on the mainland shelf: shallow (10-25 m), mid-depth (25- 100 m), and deep (100-200 m); 3) The outfall areas of the four largest POTWs treated cumulatively; 4) The outfall areas off the eleven largest stormwater discharges treated cumulatively; 5) Santa Monica Bay; and 6) Hyperion outfall area. The precision goal for the SCBPP is to develop estimates for each of the subpopulations such that the 95% confidence interval is no larger than 10% of the area in that subpopulation. Confidence intervals for estimates of percent of a population can be approximated by considering the samples to have come from a binomial population in which responses are classified as either "changed" or "not changed." Achieving a 95% confidence interval of 10% for a binomial population with a p=0.2 requires about 40 samples in each subpopulation (Figure II-1). The base design for the SCBPP will involve a 9 x 3 enhancement of the EMAP grid. This design will provide sufficient sample density to meet the project's precision goals for the bight as a whole, and for the depth and geographical subpopulations. To develop precise estimates for the Hyperion outfall and Santa Monica Bay, Hyperion will be enhanced to a 9 x 3 x 7 grid, and the remainder of Santa Monica Bay will be enhanced to a 9 x 3 x 3 grid. To address the cumulative POTW outfall subpopulation, the area around the JWPCP, CSDOC, and Point Loma outfalls will be enhanced to a 9 x 3 x 3 grid. To address the cumulative stormwater subpopulation, the stormwater outfall areas will be enhanced to a 9 x 3 x 12 grid. The size of the outfall area for each stormwater discharge was defined by a semicircle with the radius proportional to the flow (Table II-2). Applying this design yields 275 sites throughout the bight; the sample size in each subpopulation is shown in Table II-3 and the locations are shown in Appendix A with coordinates in Appendix B. Three measures of fish condition will be collected as part of the SCBPP: assemblage structure, fish gross pathology, and fish tissue chemistry. It is not financially feasible to measure fish condition at all of the sites. Fish sampling will be conducted at a reduced sampling intensity and with a smaller set of subpopulations of interest than for the other indicators. For fish pathology and assemblage structure, the subpopulations of interest will be limited to geographic zones, depth zones, and the cumulative POTW outfalls. To achieve the desired precision, the base EMAP grid will be enhanced 7 x 3 x 3 in each outfall area, to 7 x 3 in the deep (100-200 m) and shallow (10-25 m) areas away from the POTWs, and sevenfold elsewhere. Appendix C shows the locations for the fish sampling points and Appendix D contains the coordinates. For fish tissue bioaccumulation, enhancement will address only the cumulative outfall population, which will be achieved by processing fish from a subset of those sites where they were collected for assemblage structure and pathology. All sampling will occur in a summer index period between mid-July and the end of August. This period was chosen because the indicators are generally stable during the summer. This index period also ensures comparability with EMAP data from other parts of the country. C. SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODS Sediment A 0.1 m2 modified Van Veen grab will be used to collect sediment samples for physical, chemical, and infaunal analyses by the dischargers and SCCWRP (Stubbs et al. 1987, Environmental Monitoring Division 1992, Water Utilities Department 1992). Sediment samples will be collected from the top 2 cm for grain size and chemical analyses, placed in clean containers, and stored on ice. Trawling A semiballoon otter trawl with 7.6-m headrope length and a 1.3-cm cod-end mesh will be used to collect epibenthic invertebrates and demersal fish by the dischargers and SCCWRP (Meares and Stubbs 1974, Meares and Allen 1978, Environmental Monitoring Division 1992). Trawls will be towed for 10 min at 1.0- 1.2 m/sec along isobaths. Water Column The dischargers will use a Seabird CTD and SCCWRP will use an EG&G CTD to measure temperature, conductivity, depth, dissolved oxygen, and transmissivity (Environmental Monitoring Division 1992, Water Utilities Department 1992). D. SAMPLE PROCESSING METHODS Benthic Infauna Sediment samples will be sieved through a 1.0 into screen and preserved with 10% borax-buffered formalin for 24 hr. The samples will then be rinsed with water to remove formalin and stored in 70% ethanol until sorted (Stubbs et al. 1987, Environmental Monitoring Division 1992, Water Utilities Department 1992). Demersal Fish and Benthic Eoifauna The trawl catch will be sorted on deck into containers. Board-standard length will be measured on bony fishes and total length will be measured on cartilaginous fishes (wingspan for rays). All target and nontarget species of fish will be measured to the nearest millimeter for species with 10 or fewer individuals, but to the nearest centimeter for species with more than 10 individuals, (Mearns and Allen 1978, Environmental Monitoring Division 1992). Macroinvertebrate target species will be measured unless they are very abundant. Then subsamples will be returned to the lab and 50.100 individuals will be measured. Nontarget macroinvertebrates will not be measured. Biomass of individual fish and macroinvertebrates will be measured to the nearest 0.1 kg with a spring scale and a tare bucket with holes in the bottom. Small species with few individuals will be measured together to provide a composite biomass. Sediment Chemistry Each agency will analyze a list of sediment parameters that are common to all of the participating agencies (Table H-4). Metals in sediments will be analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry after sample digestion. Mercury will be analyzed by cold vapor technique. Metals in tissues will be analyzed by modifications of the above procedures. Organic compounds in sediments and tissues will be extracted with solvents and cleaned to remove interfering substances. Base- neutral and acid extractable organics will be analyzed on a GC/MS. Organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls will be analyzed on a GC with an ECD detector. 13 E. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION Analyses for the SCBPP will address the questions of greatest interest to environmental managers and scientists for developing management strategies for the Southern California Bight. The critical questions to be answered will fall into two general categories: 1) Ranking spatial subpopulations (e.g., comparing the spatial extent of contamination on the inner, middle, and outer mainland shelf), and 2) Ranking types of pollution exposure (e.g., comparing the spatial extent of organic contamination that exceeds some critical value to the spatial extent of inorganic contamination that exceeds some critical value). Most of the analyses will fall in the first category since the sampling design was deliberately enhanced for specific spatial and geographic subpopulations of interest. For example, the SCBPP will compare conditions at the POTW outfalls with conditions in other areas of the bight. Because the design is probability-based, and the inclusion probability of each sampling site is known, outfall areas can be compared with a variety of other sampled areas, such as the bight as a whole, or with a geographic subpopulation (e.g., central bight), or with a specific depth zone (e.g., mid-shelf throughout the bight). Most questions to be addressed in SCBPP analyses will be similar to: "What percent of the area of a specific subpopulation differs from reference conditions with respect to the selected indicators?" These questions will be approached in two steps. The first step will be to develop cumulative distribution functions (CDF) that describe the range of values of each parameter in each subpopulation. CDFs provide essential information about the central tendency (e.g., median) and extreme values of indicators in a single, easily summarized graph. The second step will be to select the critical value that can be used to classify the condition of several subpopulations of interest. To create these CDFs, a binary response will be determined for each sample at each X-axis interval. Selection probabilities for each site and joint selection probabilities for pairs of sites will be calculated based on the survey design. Horvitz-Thompson estimation will be applied to the data to obtain unbiased estimates of the mean response and standard error of the response using the following formulae: 14 Yi n rr-� 11i Y A where: Y = estimate of the proportion of changed area Yi = sample response for unit i (1 if changed, 0 otherwise) ni = selection probability of unit i n = number of samples A = total area and � 11 ir7- �1 —rI11 7Y7 � 7 P i _ liiY i 11I SE(Y)= A where: SEM = estimate of the standard error of estimated changed proportion nu = joint selection probability of two units Based on the CDFs, areas within subpopulations will be classified as meeting or not meeting reference conditions by indentifying threshold values for each indicator. Selecting threshold values allows managers to identify percent of the area that may be a concern. Although selecting threshold values from the CDF is an important activity, consensus is often lacldng about where to set the threshold. Developing CDFs for each subpopulation will allow managers to reassess and redefine the threshold values easily when the thresholds used in the proposed analyses are questioned. FIGURE 1I-1. Confidence intervals around an estimate of percent degraded areas as a function of sample size (U.S. EPA, Region III et al. 1993). 95% Confidence Intervals About Estimated 0-44 Surface Area of Contaminated Sediments. N 0 0.39 n j 0.34 0 .0 Q 0.29 41 fE Z 0.24 a> c - O.ifl 8 a) o.ia v 0 0.09 U 0.04 3 5 7 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Sample Size 16 TABLE II-1. Indicators that will be measured during the Southern California Bight Piolot Project benthic assemblages sediment contamination dissolved oxygen temperature salinity transmissivity sediment characteristics marine debris fish assemblages fish gross pathology fish bioaccumulation sediment toxicity n Table II-2. Location and size of outfall areas for stormwater discharge Stormwater Discharge Latitude Longitude Radius (km) Ventura River 340 16.1' 1190 18.8' 1 Santa Clara River 340 13.6 1190 16.0' 4 Calleguas Creek 340 5.9' 1190 5.5' 2 Malibu Creek 340 1.6' 118° 41.0' 1 Ballona Creek 38058.01 1180 27.2' 2 San Gabriel River 330 44.7' 1180 7.0' 4 Santa Ana River 33° 38.1' 1170 58.3' 2 Santa Margarita River 33° 13.9 117° 25.0' 1 San Luis Rey River 330 9.9' 1170 21.3' 2 San Diego River 32° 45.5' 117° 15.2' 2 Tiajuana River 32° 33.5' 1170 7.5' 2 16 . TABLE 11-3. Sample sizes in the subpopulations of interest for the three sampling designs. Base Fish Bioaccumulation Total 275 145 85 Northern 91 51 23 Central 125 55 34 Southern 59 39 27 10-25 m 65 39 9 25-100 m 132 50 50 100-200 m 78 56 26 Santa Monica Bay 80 25 17 POTW Total 81 46 46 Hyperion 40 14 14 JWPCP 7 5 5 CSDOC 11 9 9 Point Loma 23 18 18 Stormwater Total 37 5 0 19 TABLE II-4. Sediment chemical contaminants that will be measured during the Southern California Bight Pilot Project. CONVENTIONAL MEASUREMENTS Grain Size TOC Sulfides, dissolved PRIORITY POLLUTANTS Metals Base Neutral Extractables/PAHs antimony 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene arsenic 1,2-diphenylhydrazine beryllium 2,4-dimtrotoluene cadmium 2,6-dmitrotoluene chromium 3,3-dichlorobenzidine copper 4-bromodiphenylether lead 4-chlorodiphenyl ether mercury acenaphthene nickel acenaphthylene selenium anthracene silver benzidine thallium benzo(a)ppyrene zinc be nzo(k)fluoranthene bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane bis(2-chlomethyl) ether bis(2chlomisopropyl) ether bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate butyl benzyl phthalate Organic Comn_ounds chrysene dibenz(a,h)anthracene Pesticides diethylphthalate dimethylphthalate DDT di-N-butylphthalate p,p'-DDT(4,4'-DDT) di-N-octylphthalate p,p'-DDE %4'.DDE) fluoranthene p,p'-DDD 4,4'-DDD) fluorene aldrin hexachlorobenzene dieldrin hexachlorobutadiene endrin indeno(1,2,3cd)pyrene toxaphene isophorone naphthalene nitrobenzene PCBs N-nitrosodimethylamine Aroclor-1242 N-nitrosodiphenylamine Aroclor-1254 N-mtroso-di-N-propylamine Aroclor-1260 phenanthrene pyrene 20 M. INFORMATION MANAGEMENT A. OVERVIEW OF APPROACH An Information Management System (INS) will be needed to create an integrated, well-documented database and to analyze the data for the final report. More specifically, an IMS will be needed to: (1) integrate the field and laboratory data, (2) an ort program logistics and sample tracking, (3)provide access to project data and a limited number of statistical and graphical tools for data analysis and (4) facilitate communication between project members. The proposed structure of the IMS is a centralized node, located at EPA Region]X, ]inked by phone lines or Internet to project members. The node will hold the project database and will act as a link to project members. This system takes advantage of pre-e�sting UNLY hardware and software at EPA Region IX and, at the same time, allows project members to use their own computer systems as needed. This system also has the potential for becoming a regional node for linking other UNIX systems (e.g., the Aquatic Habitat Institute is San Francisco Bay, California's Teals Data Center as well as EMAP Central in Narragansett, R.I.). B. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION The SCBPP will use an existing EPA, Region DI, UNIX server with a normal complement of storage, analytical and graphical to a. EPA's GIS programs, ARC/INFO and ARCVIEW, will be available for use along with a variety of GIS data layers developed specifically for the Southern California region. Specialized software from EMAP Central will be evaluated and added as it is proven and becomes available for use. Some custom, easily modified, tools developed for monitoring programs in Southern California may also be added to the system. To support the system, EPA IX will provide computer system maintenance and a half- time database administrator to the Pilot Project. Pilot Project team members will access the central node via phone lines (8 connections). Since Region IX is a regional node, members with accounts could also access the data though Internet. This system will allow team members to use the data and tools on the main system at EPA Region 1X or to download the data for use on their own computer systems. It also provides the means for communicating between project members. C. DATABASE DEVELOPMENT Each of the project members has a computer and management system, including QA/QC procedures, for marine monitoring data. As samples are analyzed, the participants will use their existing systems to track samples and generate data. QA/QC will be performed on the data at all stages of the process. However, once the data has been approved by project members, it must be integrated into a database. To take advantage of existing software and protocols, the SCBPP is proposing to use EPA's Ocean Data Evaluation System (ODES) for data integration. One of the project participants has developed programs to convert data into ODES format as well as to check the data for errors. Since these programs are well tested, they 21 can be easily used to create an integrated dataset. This will also allow the SCBPP to use ODES QA/QC procedures to check the final dataset. In addition, ODES procedures will be used to produce supporting documentation for the dataset. The integrated dataset will be stored in an Oracle (Version 6) database on EPA Region IX's UNIX system. Funds are budgeted to have a contractor modify the existing ORACLE database structure used by County Sanitation Districts of Orange County to accept all the data types generated by the SCBPP. Since most of the EMAP variables are already routinely included in the database, modification of the database structure should be straightforward. The SCBPP is also proposing to submit a copy of the integrated dataset and supporting documentation to ODES. In addition, ODES will be funded to provide two new EMAP tools, a Cumulative Distribution Function and Variance. This will allow outside parties to access and analyze the data on ODES or to download the data to their own systems. D. FIELD COMPUTER SYSTEM The EMAP (Esturaries) program has developed a Field Computer System (FCS) to standardize a number of essential field sampling, sample tracking and management activities. This system has been improved with two years of use in the Virginian Province. A nearly completed contract is expected to produce a more generic system, which could be converted at a nominal cost for use in the SCBPP. Pilot Project members will continue to follow the development of the FCS over the next few months. Field teams have not as yet met to discuss details of field equipment and sample tracking. However, if the Field Computer System is ready, and Project members decide to use the system, it should be possible to adapt the FCS for use in the SCBPP. IV. QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL A. INTRODUCTION A quality assurance (QA) program is an important part of any environmental monitoring project. A carefully planned quality assurance program helps to ensure that the data collected are scientifically valid, comparable, and adequate to meet the goals of the study. QA is particularly important for large monitoring projects that involve many participants because the many different field crews and laboratories involved frequently have difficulty producing comparable data (NRC 1990a). Such problems usually arise because, in the haste to initiate the data collection program, field crews are not adequately trained to employ standard collection methods, and the comparability of the laboratory capabilities and processing methods is not evaluated (Taylor 1985). A QA program is especially important for the SCBPP because of the widely distributed implementation proposed for the project. At least five different organizations (including the POTWs, SCCWRP, and contractors) will collect samples for the SCBPP, and at least six different organizations will be involved in laboratory processing of samples. The POTWs and SCCWRP, who will be 2 responsible for much of the SCBPP sampling, each have their own processing laboratories; consequently, several different laboratories will perform the same kinds of functions, such as chemical analyses or sorting and identifying benthic samples, for the project. Encouraging and maintaining consistency in field and laboratory operations and ensuring data comparability, therefore, will be critical to the success of the SCBPP. The primary goal of the QA/QC plan is to ensure that the data generated by the participants is comparable. This goal will be achieved through a combination of common methods (where appropriate) and performance based standards. Where common methods are agreed upon for the SCBPP, QA/QC measures can be used to assure that methods are applied consistently. Where performance based standards are appropriate, QA/QC measurements can be used as a measure of performance. The appropriate QA/QC procedures for each of the monitoring program components (e.g. field operations, water quality, sediment and tissue chemistry, benthic analyses, demersal fish)will be established by the SCBPP steering committee. B. GENERAL APPROACH TO QUALITY ASSURANCE The QA program for the SCBPP will consist of two distinct but related kinds of activities: quality assurance and quality control. Quality assurance includes design, planning, and management activities conducted prior to implementation of the project to enure that the appmpriate kinds and quantities of data will be collected. The goal of quality assurance is to ensure that standard collection, processing, and analytical techniques will be applied consistently and correctly; that the number of lost, damaged, and uncollected samples will be m+n++�+�ad; that the integrity of the data will be maintained and documented from sample collection to entry into the data record; that all data will be comparable; and that results can be reproduced. Quality control (QC) activities are implemented during the monitoring project to evaluate the effectiveness of the QA activities. QC activities enure that measurement error and bias are identified, quantified, and accounted for or eliminated, if practical. QC activities include both internal and external checks. Typical internal QC checks include repeated measurements, internal test samples, use of independent methods to verify findings, and use of standard reference materials. Typical external QC checks include exchanging samples among laboratories for reprocessing to test comparability of results, independent performance audits, and periodic proficiency examination. Because of the SCBPP's distributed implementation scheme, the QA program for the pilot project will emphasize quality assurance activities. The capabilities of the laboratories that process samples from the current compliance monitoring programs are well established and generally thought to be acceptable for the SCBPP. QA activities, therefore, will focus on developing a common field manual and documenting the comparability of laboratory methods. Training of field and laboratory personnel will focus on communicating goals and objectives of the pilot program as well any modification in methods or procedures that may have been made for the pilot project to ensure data comparability. The purpose of this training is to verify that all participants will be able to implement the agreed-upon procedures in a consistent manner with comparable proficiency. Quantitative measures of the overall effectiveness of training will be identified to translate QA activities such as communication and training into QC activities such as 23 performance audits and proficiency examinations. These quantitative measures are known as measurement quality objectives (MQOs). C. MEASUREMENT QUALITY OBJECTIVES MQOs establish acceptable levels of uncertainty for each measurement process in an environmental monitoring project. MQOs typically address the major components of data quality: representativeness, completeness, precision, accuracy and comparability. Data comparability, or "the confidence with which one data set can be compared to another" (Stanley and Verner 1985), is a primary concern in the SCBPP. Comparability of reporting units and calculations, data base management processes, and interpretative procedures must be ensured if the overall goals of the SCBPP are to be realized; furthermore, SCBPP data must be generally, comparable with EMAP data to facilitate data sharing. Specific MQOs for precision and accuracy, the most readily quantifiable components of data quality, have been identified for the SCBPP to ensure that the data produced by the many field crews and laboratories involved in the project will be comparable. Accuracy is defined as the difference between the measured value of an indicator and its true or expected value, which represents an estimate of systematic error or net bias (Kirchner 1983, Hunt and Wilson 1986, Taylor 1985). Precision is the degree of mutual agreement among individual measurements and represents an estimate of random error (Kirchner 1983, Hunt and Wilson 1986, Taylor 1987). Together,accuracy and precision provide an estimate of the total error or uncertainty associated with a measured value. Requiring participating field crews and laboratories to achieve standard, quantitative MQOs for accuracy and precision will help to ensure that individual data sets are free of any crew- or laboratory-specific bias and that the degree of random error is consistent across data sets. Accuracy and precision goals for indicators to be measured during the SCBPP are provided in Table IV-1. Accuracy and precision cannot be defined for all parameters because of the nature of the measurements. For example, accuracy measurements are not possible for toxicity testing, sample collection activities, and fish pathology measurements. An MQO for completeness has also been defined for the SCBPP. Completeness is a measure of the proportion of the expected, valid data (i.e., data not associated with some criterion of potential unacceptability) that is actually collected during a measurement process. The MQO for completeness in the SCBPP is 90% for each measurement process. The sampling design for the SCBPP is sufficiently redundant to absorb the loss of up to 10% of the samples without compromising the goals of the program, provided that the lost samples are not concentrated in a single subpopulation of interest. Redundancy was incorporated at this level because monitoring programs of this size typically lose as many as 10% of samples as a result of logistical difficulties or failure to achieve quality control criteria. D. QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES Establishing MQOs is of little value if the proper quality assurance activities are not undertaken to ensure that such objectives will be met. Quality assurance in the SCBPP will be achieved by za -- developing a common field manual and documenting the comparability of laboratory methods that are consistent with the MQOs; and -- implementing training workshops to ensure that participants are familiar with methods and are capable of achieving the MQOs. Field and Laboratory Manuals SCBPP participants use similar methods for the existing compliance monitoring programs; however, methods do vary slightly between organizations. Using common methods for the SCBPP would eliminate this variability and help to ensure comparability of data between organizations. However, this is not always practical and in many cases performance based standards may be more appropriate. For the SCBPP, field and laboratory manuals will be prepared detailing either acceptable methods or performance standards and the appropriate level of Q A/QC. These manuals will be prepared by the field and laboratory coordinators who will work with the appropriate personnel within each of the participating agencies to establish the appropriate procedures for the SCBPP. The preparation and review of these manuals will serve to highlight potential problem areas. Copies of these manuals will then be distributed to all participants in the program prior to the training workshops. These manuals will form the basis for training workshops and provide a reference for field and laboratory personnel during sample collection and processing activities. The field manual will include detailed descriptions of all procedures to be used for sample collection and field analyses. The manual will also identify criteria for acceptable samples and conditions under which samples need to be recollected. This degree of specificity is intended to ensure that all data are collected in a similar manner by all field crews. Areas expected to be covered in the field manual include: -- Navigation and positioning Standardization of CTD deployment Collection of sediment samples for grain size, chemistry, infauna and toxicity Standardization of fish trawling operations Shipboard analyses of fish and epibenthic invertebrates Sample tracking and shipboard information management The laboratory manual(s) will address the appropriate procedures or performance standards for analyses of sediment grain size, benthic infauna, and sediment and tissue chemistry. For benthic infauna, appropriate taxonomic keys will be identified by the field and laboratory coordinators, working in consultation with regional professional groups such as the Southern California Association of Marine Invertebrate Taxonomists (SCAMIT). Since the chemical analyses are expected to be performance based, the manual will be used primarily to document the methods used by each of the participants and establish the performance standards. zs Field and laboratory manuals will also contain sets of standard data sheets to be used by all personnel working on this project. Standard data sheets will provide a framework for ensuring that all groups record all of the proper data. Standard data sheets will also ensure comparability of measurement units recorded by each group and provide a means for ensuring that common taxonomic nomenclature is used by all participating laboratories. Using standard data sheets will facilitate development of data entry protocols and mini i e transcription error. Training Proper training of field and laboratory personnel is a critical aspect of quality assurance. SCBPP participants will provide field and laboratory personnel who have extensive experience, therefore, training for the SCBPP will focus on ensuring consistency in data collection among all personnel. Training, particularly for field crews, will also focus on ensuring that all personnel understand the goals and sampling design of the project. In any field project, sampling crews will need to make decisions in the field, such as what to do if a selected site cannot be sampled for a particular variable (e.g. rock substrate prevents use of the benthic sampling gear). The field manual will attempt to address the situations most likely to arise during the SCBPP and will identify who in the SCBPP management structure should be consulted for advice regarding situations that are not covered in the manual. The most efficient way to ensure that field crews make wise choices, however, is to ensure that all participants understand the goals of the program. Part of the training process will include establishing reference collections that can be accessed by crew members for verification both before and during the project. Three types of reference collections will be established: fish taxonomy, fish pathology, and invertebrate taxonomy. Reference collections will be established by asking each participating group that presently maintains any such reference collection to submit specimens to the SCBPP field or laboratory coordinators. Developing reference collections in this way will help to identify differences in current practices, as well as providing a common reference for the current project. Upon completion of the formal training program, each organizations's field crew and participating laboratory will be required to pass proficiency examinations before being allowed to participate in the SCBPP. Field crews will be required to demonstrate proficiency in the following areas: -- checking sampling equipment prior to deployment -- locating stations using the navigation system -• using all the sampling gear entering data on field data sheets -- identifying fish species and fish pathology Laboratories will be required to demonstrate proficiency by achieving the MQOs for blind samples provided by the QA Officer or his designee. For chemistry and grain size measurements, the proficiency examination probably will involve participating in a multi-laboratory intercalibration exercise using standard reference materials. For benthic invertebrate samples, the proficiency may be demonstrated by the 26 correct identification of a common set organisms compiled from a reference collection. E. QUALITY CONTROL ACTIVITIES The effectiveness of quality assurance efforts will be measured by quality control activities, which fall into two categories: routine QC checks coordinated by each laboratory or field crew's internal QA Officer, and performance audits conducted by the SCBPP QA Officer or designee The goal of these activities is to quantify accuracy and precision, but, most importantly, they will be used to identify problems that need to be corrected as data sets are generated and assembled. Routine QC Checks Field and laboratory crews will perform routine QC checks daily or weekly, as specified in the field and laboratory manuals. Routine QC checks will identify problems with particular personnel or instrumentation at the earliest possible stage, so that problems can be corrected, and data corruption or the cost of reprocessing can be minimised. For benthic macroinvertebrates, both sorting and taxonomic identification will be evaluated on a routine basis. Each technician's efficiency at sorting organisms from sediment and debris will be evaluated through an independent resort conducted by a second, experienced technician. A minimum of 10% of all samples sorted by each technician (i.e., one sample chosen at random from every batch of ten samples) will be resorted. The minimum acceptable sorting efficiency is 90%. If a technician's sorting efficiency falls below that level, all samples in the failed batch will be resorted. QC checks for taxonomic accuracy will be performed on a minimum of 10% of all samples processed by each taxonomist. Only senior taxonomists will be permitted to perform quality control checks on taxonomic identifications. The minimum acceptable level for accuracy for identification and enumeration is 90%. If results fall below this level, the entire QC batch will be reidentified and counted. If taxonomic efficiency is between 90% and 95%, the original technician will be advised, and species identifications will be reviewed as part of continuous training. All results will be documented in a QC logbook maintained in the laboratory. For chemistry, routine QC checks will include processing duplicate, blank, spike and calibration samples and may also include processing blind performance evaluation samples. The type and frequency of QC activities that will be performed for each sampling activity are summarized in Table IV•2. Field and laboratory technicians and analysts will be apprised routinely of their performance on quality control samples. Corrective action resulting from a failed QC check will depend on the magnitude of the problem. Both warning and control criteria will be established to guide the selection of corrective action. Exceeding a warning criterion will require only rechecking calculations or measurement processes; exceeding a control criterion will require reprocessing all 27 samples processed since the last QC check. Field and laboratory technicians and analysts who repeatedly exceed warning or control criteria will be prohibited from handling SCBPP samples until they are retrained. Examples of the warning and control limits that will be used in conducting chemical analyses of sediments and tissue samples collected during the SCBPP are shown in Table IV-3. Recommended detection limits for chemical analyses are shown in Table IV-4. Performance Audits The second kind of QC activity will consist of field and laboratory audits performed by the SCBPP QA Officer or a designee. Whereas routine QC checks are designed to ensure accuracy within a laboratory, performance audits are designed to ensure consistency across all field crews and laboratories participating in the project. Each crew and laboratory will be audited at least once during the program. Field QC audits will be conducted to verify each field crew's compliance with the standard sampling protocols identified in the field manual. If the auditor observes any deviations from the field methods manual, the auditor will review the correct protocol with the crew immediately. Crews will be audited for adherence to proper sampling technique, correct identification of an acceptable sample, sample processing, and data entry. The QA Officer or a designee will perform laboratory performance audits. The QA Officer may introduce additional performance evaluation samples as part of the laboratory audit. Such performance evaluations during the middle of the effort will verify that laboratories are maintaining the levels of precision and consistency demonstrated during proficiency examinations prior to initiating processing. Each field crew and laboratory will be responsible for establishing and maintaining a reference collection of identified taxa. This collection will be used to verify identifications, provide consistency in the training of new taxonomists, and help resolve any taxonomic problems that may occur during the project. During performance audits, representative samples of each laboratory's reference collection will be reviewed by a selected taxonomic expert to ensure accuracy and consistency among all the laboratories. F. QUALITY ASSURANCE FOR INFORMATION MANAGEMENT Quality control activities will also be instituted for establishing the database for the SCBPP. When manual entry of data is required, a hard copy of the entered data will be checked against the original by a second data entry operator to identify mismatches and correct keypunching errors. When data are transferred, the transfer will be done electronically, if possible, using communications protocols (e.g., Kermit software) that check the completeness and accuracy of the transfer. When data are transferred using floppy disks or tapes, the group sending the information will specify the number of bytes and the file names of the transferred files. These data characteristics will be verified upon receipt of the data. If the file can be verified, it will be incorporated into the data base. Otherwise, new files will be requested. Whenever feasible, a hard copy of all data will be provided with transferred files. _ Erroneous numeric data will be identified using range checks, filtering algorithms, and comparisons to lists of valid values established by experts for 26 specific data types. EPA's ODES data management system provides well established QA/QC procedures which includes computerized error checking (range checks and format errors) and an independent technical review by a qualified database manager. When data fall outside an acceptable range, they will be flagged in a report for the SCBPP Quality Assurance Officer (QAO). 29 Table IV-1. Measurement Quality Ob'ectives (MQO's) for SCBPP indicators and associated data. Accuracy Precision Completeness INDICATORS goal goal goal Water quality salinity 0.5 ppt NA* 900A temperature 1 oC NA 900/0 dissolved oxygen 0.5 mg/l NA 90% pH 0.2 NA 90% Sediment grain size NA 10% 90% Sediment contaminants organics 30% 30% 90% inorganics 15% 15% 90% Sediment toxicity NA NA 90% Benthic infaune sample collection NA NA 90% sorting 5% NA 90% counting 10% NA 90% identification 10% NA 90% biomass NA 10% 90% Demersal fish sample collection NA NA 75% counting 10% NA 90% identification 10% NA 90% length 5 mm NA 90% biomass NA 10% 90"/0 gross pathology NA NA 90% Contaminants in fish 30% 15% 90% * NA=not applicable 30 Table IV-2. Type and Frequency of recommended Quality measures for the SCBPP INDICATOR QUALITY CONTROL FREQUENCY MEASUREMENT QUALITY OBJECTIVE Salinity Field calibration daily Accuracy of 0.5 ppt Temperature Field calibration daily Accuracy of 1°C Dissolved oxygen Field calibration daily Accuracy of 0.5 mgl/l PH Field calibration daily Accuracy of 0.2 pH units Grain size Duplicate splits 10% of samples 10%precision Sediment contaminants Duplicate analyses 10% of samples Accuracy and presision 30% for organics; 15% for metals Benthic sorting Resort 10% of samples 95% Accuracy Benthic identification Recount and ID of 10% of samples 90% Accuracy and enumeration sorted animals Fish identification Field audit at least once 95%Accuracy Fish abundances Field audit at least once 90% Accuracy Fish length and biomass Field audit at least once 10% Precision Fish pathology Lab verification all fish with Not applicable pathology 31 Table IV-3. Warning and control limits for quality control samples. Recommended Recommended Analysis Type Warning Limit Control Limit Method Blanks Less than detection (organic and inorganic) limit Matrix Spikes 50°% Not specified Laboratory Control Sample Organic 80% - 120% 70% - 130% Inorganic 90% - 110% 85% - 115% Laboratory Duplicate 30% relative (organic and inorganic) percent difference Ongoing Calibration Check 15% of the (organic and inorganic) initial calibration Standard Reference Material Organic 80% - 120% 70% - 130% Inorganic 90% - 110% 85% - 115% 32. Table IV-4. Recommended method detection limits (in ppm dry weight) for SCBPP chemical analyses. Analyte Tissue Sediment Sample Sample Inorganics (Concentrations in ug/g (ppm), dry weight) Tissue Sediments Aluminum not measured 1500 Antimony not measured 0.2 Arsenic not measured 1.5 Cadmium not measured 0.05 Chromium not measured 5.0 Copper not measured 5.0 Iron not measured 500 Lead not measured 1.0 Manganese not measured 1.0 Mercury not measured 0.01 Nickel not measured 1.0 Selenium not measured 0.1 Silver not measured 0.01 Tin not measured 0.1 Zinc not measured 2.0 Organics (Concentrations in ng/g(ppb), dry weight) Tissue Sediments PAHs not measured 10 PCB congeners 2.0 1.0 Chlorinated pesticides 2.0 1.0 33 V. PROJECT MANAGEMENT Effective project management is a vital component in the success of any environmental monitoring project. This is especially true when the project requires coordinating the efforts of many diverse groups to produce data that are reliable and comparable. The proposed Southern California Bight Pilot Project will involve 12 participating organizations, including federal, state, and local agencies. The participants in the pilot project include regulators and regulated dischargers with diverse goals and interests. The pilot project represents the first significant attempt to develop integrated regional monitoring throughout the Southern California Bight and has already required considerable coordination to define mutual objectives and develop a standard sampling design and methods. Continued coordination will be vital to the success of the pilot project and to evaluating the feasibility of regional monitoring in the bight. The Southern California Bight Pilot Project will be a cooperative effort among ORD/EMAP; EPA Region IX; the California State Water Resources Control Board; the Los Angeles, Santa Ana, and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Boards; the Environmental Monitoring Division of the City of Los Angeles; County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County; County Sanitation Districts of Orange County; Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Facility of the City of San Diego; the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project; and the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project (U.S. EPA National Estuary Program). The management structure is shown in Figure III.1. Overall coordination of the project will be the responsibility of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP). SCCWRP is a joint powers agency formed in 1969 to study the effects of wastewater discharge and other anthropogenic inputs on the ecology of the Southern California Bight. It is governed by a nine-member Commission composed of representatives from the four largest POTWs in Southern California and from federal, state, and local regulatory agencies with responsibilities for wastewater discharge. In 1992, the SCCWRP Commission endorsed the concept of regional monitoring (Resolution 92-3) and charged SCCWRP to facilitate and coordinate a regional monitoring effort. Dr. Jeffrey Cross, Executive Director of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP)will serve as Project Manager. He will provide overall guidance and direction. Dr. Cross has worked for over a decade on studies that have addressed the sources, fates, and effects of contaminants in the coastal marine ecosystem off Southern California. He has extensive experience in providing oversight for large-scale projects. Most recently, he directed a multiyear effort to estimate the mass loadings of anthropogenic contaminants to the Southern California Bight. Mr. Terrence Fleming, Project Officer at U.S. EPA Region IX, will be the QA Officer and will be responsible for directing the QA components of the project. He will review the manuals, assist with training, conduct proficiency tests and audits, 34 and summarize the QA information. Mr. Fleming has extensive experience in project management, both at EPA and at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. In this capacity, he has provided QA support for projects similar to the SCBPP. Dr. M. James Allen, Regional Monitoring Coordinator at SCCWRP, will be the Field Coordinator. He will oversee the administrative and technical components of field operations. He will coordinate the schedule and logistics of field sampling; determine equipment sharing needs; write procedures manuals; develop sample storage and transfer protocols; develop data sheets and a tracking system; implement training programs; and work with the QA Officer and Information Management Coordinator. Dr. Allen has more than two decades of experience working on a variety of sampling vessels with all of the sampling gear that will be used in the SCBPP. He has also had extensive experience in large-scale marine surveys from Southern California to the Bering Sea. Mr. Richard Gossett, Chemistry Laboratory Manager at County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, will be the Laboratory Coordinator. He will oversee the administrative and technical components of laboratory analyses. He will coordinate the schedule and logistics of laboratory analyses; write procedures manuals; develop data sheets and a tracking system; implement training programs; and work with the QA Officer and Information Management Coordinator. Mr. Gossett has two decades of experience analyzing water, sediments, and animal tissues from the coastal marine ecosystem off Southern California. He has more than a decade of experience managing analytical laboratories responsible for analyzing marine samples. And he has organized and implemented multiagency intercalibration programs in analytical chemistry of marine samples in Southern California. Robert Hall, Environmental Scientist, EPA Region IX, is the Information Management Officer. He will coordinate the schedule and logistics of data reporting and management; develop data transfer formats and protocols; write procedures manuals; and work with the QA Officer and the Data Analysis and Reporting Coordinators. Mr. Hall has more than ten years of experience with UNIX operating systems. He has extensive experience with digital cartography and GIS. Dr. Mary Bergen, director of the Benthic Laboratory at SCCWRP, and Dr. M. James Allen, Regional Monitoring Coordinator at SCCWRP, will be the Data Analysis and Reporting Coordinators. They will be responsible for coordinating the various groups addressing the different assessment questions with the data collected during the pilot. They will also be responsible for collating and editing the various portions of the report written by these groups. Between them, Drs. Bergen and Allen have four decades of experience analyzing and interpreting data from large-scale surveys, and writing reports. Most recently, Dr. Bergen wrote the marine portion of the California Comprehensive Offshore Resource Study for the California State Lands Commission. Most recently, Dr. Allen wrote the Santa Monica Bay Characterization Study report for the Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project (U.S. EPA National Estuary Program). 35 Each of the coordinators described above will be supported by technical representative of each of the agencies and organizations participating in the SCBPP. The coordinators will be responsible for overseeing all technical effort in their project areas, and for soliciting and compiling the comments of all members of their technical support groups. The coordinators will act as liaisons for maintaining communication and consensus among project participants throughout the further development and implementation of the SCBPP. Such distributed coordination provides a mechanism for ensuring that the interests of all SCBPP participants are recognized and considered; it also creates a forum for constructive resolution of any conflicts that may arise during the course of the project. Finally, distributed coordination of the technical areas of the project will help to ensure that the full range of abilities and expertise available from the diverse participants in the SCBPP are exercised to the fullest advantage throughout the project. The project will be supported by an advisory committee composed of representatives of the participating agencies and other individuals whose technical and programmatic expertise will provide project guidance. The advisory committee ensures that the SCBPP is a multi-agency effort and that decisions are achieved through consensus. The advisory committee will also review all documents before they are released. The advisory committee, which will meet bimonthly, is composed of the following members: Ms. Janet Hashimoto, U.S. EPA Region IX Mr. Terrence Fleming, U.S. EPA Region IX Dr. John Dorsey, Environmental Monitoring Division, City of Los Angeles Ms. Janet Stull, County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County Dr. C. Irwin Haydock, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Ms. Patricia Vainik, Water Utilities Department, City of San Diego Mr. Michael Lyons, Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board Mr. Gordon Anderson, Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Mr. Peter Otis, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Mr. Craig Wilson, California State Water Resources Control Board Dr. Rainer Hoenicke, Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project, National Estuary Program Mr. John Mitchell, State Stormwater Quality Task Force Dr. Jeffrey Cross, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Dr. M. James Allen, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Dr. Mary Bergen, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Dr. Kevin Summers, ORD/EMAP Dr. Steve Weisberg, Versar 36 FIGURE V-1. Management structure for the Southern California Bight Pilot Project. QA Officer Project Advisory T. Fleming Manager Committee EPA Region IX J. Cross SCC WRP Field Laboratory Information Data Analysis Coordinator Coordinator Management and Reporting J.Allen R. Gossett Officer Coordinators SCCWRP CSDOC R. Hall M. Bergen EPA Re&nlX J.Allen SCCWRP 37 VI. PROJECT BUDGET The Southern California Bight Pilot Project will be a cooperative effort funded by the following organizations and agencies: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Research and Development (ORD) through EMAP EPA Region IX Environmental Monitoring Division of the City of Los Angeles, County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, and Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Facility of the City of San Diego (collectively known as POTWs) Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project (U.S. EPA National Estuary Program) California State Water Resources Control Board Los Angeles, Santa Ana, and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Boards Together, these participants will provide a total budget of$2,513,000 (Table VI-1). The budget contributions and the anticipated uses are described below. All contributions described herein are tentative and contingent upon approval of the respective organizations. The POTWs will contribute the equivalent of$1,338,000 in the form of planning, management, field sampling, laboratory processing of samples, quality assurance, data analysis, and reporting. This contribution will be "revenue neutral" with respect to the existing POTW annual monitoring budgets; no additional internal appropriations will be required to enable these participants to meet their commitments to the SCBPP. Maintaining revenue neutrality for the POTWs was a guiding principle in developing the budget for the proposed project. Revenue neutrality ensures the support and cooperation of the organizations that currently perform most of the environmental monitoring in the Southern California Bight. Cooperation of the POTWs is the cornerstone of successful regional monitoring in the bight. SCCWRP will contribute the equivalent of$305,000 in the form of in-kind services for planning and management of the SCBPP, as well as field sampling, laboratory processing of chemistry samples, sediment toxicity testing, quality assurance, data analysis, and reporting. The contribution will come from internal resources. EPA Region IX will contribute the equivalent of$180,000 for planning and management, quality assurance, and data analysis and reporting. Approximately $100,000 of this contribution will be in the form of contract fund to fulfill project requirements that cannot currently be met through in-kind services of Region IX staff. Region IX's contribution also includes in-kind personnel support in the form of a QA Coordinator and Information Management Coordinator for the SCBPP. 38 The Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project will contribute $167,000 in in- kind services and contract funds. The in-kind services will be in the form of general support for planning and management, quality assurance, data analysis, and reporting for the SCBPP. The contract funds will be dedicated exclusively for field sampling, laboratory processing of samples, and data analysis and reporting for the design "enhancements" in Santa Monica Bay. EMAP will contribute $500,000 to aid in developing regional monitoring in the Southern California Bight. EMAP funds are currently allocated for contract support to sample areas outside the geographic boundaries of the existing POTW monitoring programs. Sampling these areas will require separate boats, and sample processing may require additional taxonomic experts, particularly to identify specimens from sampling sites north of Point Dume. The Los Angeles, Santa Ana, and San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Boards will contribute the equivalent of$17,000 in in-kind services for planning and management of the SCBPP, as well as quality assurance, data analysis, and reporting. The California State Water Resources Control Board will contribute the equivalent of$6,000 in in-kind services for planning and management of the SCBPP, as well as quality assurance, data analysis, and reporting. 39 TABLE VI-1. Budget for the Southern California Bight Pilot Project. EMAP SCCWRP1 EPA IX POTWS2 In thousands of dollars Planning 12 70 70 73 Field Sampling Benthos 22 44 Fish 41 75 Equipment 20 40 Administration 30 10 60 Lab Processing Benthoe 60 115 Grain size 19 Sediment Chemistry 40 40 358 Fish Tissue 25 25 154 Sediment Toxicity 80 40 Information Management 100 50 200 Analysis and Reporting 100 100 50 200 Total 500 305 180 1338 1Funding is contingent on approval by the SCCWRP Commission. 2Funding is contingent on regulatory approval to exchange present monitoring requirements for the summer quarter of 1994 for the program described in this proposal. 40 (TABLE W-1. Continued) SMBRP3 RWQCBS SWRCB TOTAL In thousands of dollars Planning 11 11 3 250 Field Sampling Benthos 9 75 Fish 116 Equipment 60 Administration 100 Lab Processing Benthos 25 200 Grain size 19 Sediment Chemistry 62 500 Fish Tissue 204 Sediment Toxicity 120 Information Management 50 400 Analysis and Reporting 10 6 3 469 Total 167 17 6 2,513 SFunding is contingent on approval of the SMBRP Management Advisory Committee and Technical Advisory Committee. 41 VII. LITERATURE CITED Boesch, D.F. and R. Rosenberg. 1981. Response to stress in marine benthic communities. pp. 179-200, In: Stress effects on natural ecosystems. G.W. Barret and R. Rosenberg (eds.). John Wiley & Sons, New York. Briggs, J.C. 1974. Marine zoogeography. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY. 475 P. Emery, K.O. 1960. The sea off Southern California. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. 366 p. Environmental Monitoring Division. 1992. Santa Monica Bay annual assessment report 1990-1991. Bureau of Sanitation, Department of Public Works, City of Los Angeles, CA. 225 p. Gray, J.S. 1982. Effects of pollutants on marine ecosystems. Neth. J. Sea Res. 16:424-443. Hoffman, M.S., J. Foley, and T. McGuire. 1992. The world almanac and book of facts, 1993. World Almanac, New York, NY. 960 p. Hunt, D.T.E., and A.L. Wilson. 1986. The Analysis of Water: General Principles and Techniques. 2nd ed. Royal Society of Chemistry, London, Eng. 683 p. Kirchner, C.J. 1983. Quality control in water analysis. Environ. Sci. and Technol. 17(4):174A-181A. Mearns, A.J., and H.S. Stubbs. 1974. Comparison of otter trawls used in Southern California coastal surveys. So. Calif. Coastal Water Res. Proj., El Segundo, CA. TM 213. 15 p. Mearns, A.J., and M.J. Allen. 1978. Use of small otter trawls in coastal biological surveys. U.S. Environ. Prot. Agcy., Environ. Res. Lab., Corvallis, OR. EPA- 600/3-78-083. 33 p. National Research Council. 1990a. Monitoring Southern California's coastal waters. Nat.Acad. Press, Washington, DC. 154 p. National Research Council. 1990b. Managing troubled waters: the role of marine environmental monitoring. Nat.Acad. Press, Washington, DC. 125 p. NRC. See National Research Council. Pearson, T.H. and R. Rosenberg. 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol.Ann. Rev. 16:229-311. SCCWRP. See Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. 1973. The ecology of the Southern California Bight: implications for water quality management. SCCWRP Tech. Rep. 104. So. Calif. Coastal Water Res. Proj., El Segundo. 531 p. 43 Stanley, T.W. and S.S. Verner. 1985. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's quality assurance program. pp 12-19 In: Quality Assurance for Environmental Measurements J.K. Taylor and T.W. Stanley (eds.). ASTM STP 867. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. Stubbs, H.S., D.W. Diehl, and G.P. Hershelman. 1987. A Van Veen grab sampling method. So. Calif. Coastal Water Res. Proj., Long Beach, CA. 4 p. Taylor, J.K. 1987. Quality Assurance of chemical measurements. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Chelsea, Michigan. 328 p. Thompson, B.E., J. Laughlin, and D. Tsukada. 1987. 1985 Reference site survey. SCCWR.P Tech. Rep. 221. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Long Beach, CA. 50 p. Thompson, B.E., D. Tsukada, and D. O'Donohue. 1992. 1990 Reference site survey. SCCWRP Tech. Rep. 355. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Long Beach, CA. 58 p. U.S. EPA. see U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, State of Delaware, State of Maryland, and Delaware Inland Bays and Estuary Program. 1993. The Delaware/Maryland coastal bays joint assessment technical proposal. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III. 56 p. Water Utilities Department. 1992. City of San Diego ocean monitoring program receiving waters monitoring report. Metro Water Division, City of San Diego, CA. 225 p. Word, J. and A. Mearns. 1979. 60-meter Control Survey off Southern California. SCCWRP Tech. Rep. 229. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Long Beach, CA 58 p. APPENDIX A LOCATION OF PROPOSED SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES FOR BASE DESIGN' Does not include srotmwater samples ?IS aU p`��` � ��_ A. l A Sou{iterrt Car D B lght Central Paw '• S i �l. i o�� ;'•• `= of o . t \ i uBTSDG d6yja ,U.1v wa no5`.., k ; ig �nuo;rieJ u�a�}nog ', \ :1 APPENDIX B COORDINATES OF PROPOSED SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES FOR BASE DESIGN' Does not include stotmwater samples Design 1 Point ID Longitude Latitude Point ID Longitude Latitude 1 1171954 33 00 51 44 118 09 18 $3 40 26 2 1171832 32 58 45 45 1181007 334242 3 1171542 32 52 45 46 1181555 3341 08 4 1170916 32 37 29 47 1181540 333911 5 117 09 10 32 34 52 48 118 12 10 33 38 04 6 11711 50 32 35 58 49 118 09 20 33 37 34 7 1171202 32 37 38 50 1181444 33 35 44 8 1171544 32 35 38 51 1161041 33 33 20 9 117 14 10 32 32 28 52 118 16 57 33 37 09 10 117 15 55 32 33 12 53 1171630 32 47 10 11 117 20 33 32 32 13 54 1171839 32 46 20 12 117 32 41 33 19 DO 56 1171700 32 43 00 13 117 34 37 33 20 16 57 117 16 43 32 40 35 14 117 36 57 33 22 13 58 11718 3B 3241 59 15 117 28 07 3311 15 61 1171902 32 47 49 16 117 30 34 331532 62 1171913 32 46 26 17 1172910 331340 64 11721 17 32 47 14 18 1172215 33 09 57 67 1171837 32 45 D5 19 11721 14 33 04 07 68 1171732 32 43 24 20 117 26 31 33 10 04 70 118 50 57 33 59 44 21 117 23 07 33 OB 18 71 1171914 $2 44 23 22 117 19 35 32 56 36 74 117 21 37 32 44 36 23 1171801 32 50 17 75 117 20 55 32 42 47 24 117 21 20 32 48 28 77 118 53 15 33 59 45 25 117 17 44 32 35 54 79 118 56 50 34 00 14 26 117 20 08 32 35 41 80 111358 51 34 00 16 27 117 37 41 33 24 49 81 119 00 33 34 00 24 28 117 44 D4 33 27 18 82 119 05 38 34 04 35 29 117 46 51 33 31 30 83 119 02 51 34 02 58 30 117 43 18 33 26 D9 84 119 07 57 34 04 28 31 11741 19 33 25 33 85 119 10 00 340306 32 117 40 41 33 22 56 86 119 00 45 33 59 46 33 117 41 26 33 24 18 87 1191803 34 14 35 34 117 36 55 33 18 53 88 119 18 57 34 12 44 35 118 04 54 3341 02 89 119 22 07 34 17 43 36 118 02 16 33 39 04 90 11921 26 34 14 12. 37 118 03 47 33 38 27 91 119 22 24 341444 38 118 05 57 33 36 15 92 11911 14 34 07 44 39 11806 14 33 35 43 93 11911 57 34 04 41 40 118 09 37 33 33 41 84 119 16 41 34 09 09 41 118 08 08 33 43 39 95 119 14 11 34 06 44 42 1180861 3341 32 96 119 16 27 34 07 29 43 118 DS 10 33 38 50 97 119 22 24 34 13 11 Z00lm V d 3 Q LZ:9T CS/ZT/TT Design 1 Point ID Longitude Latitude Point ID longitude Latitude 98 11921 07 34 09 12 141 -1200830 34 27 32 99 11921 53 34 09 12 142 120 07 5B 34 24 36 100 119 27 59 34 09 18 143 120 10 20 34 24 33 101 119 13 23 34 03 12 144 120 12 55 34 25 23 102 119 33 11 34 23 07 145 120 16 47 34 25 07 103 119 32 45 34 23 02 146 120 02 20 34 24 56 104 119 28 58 341932 147 12021 03 34 25 27 105 119 35 14 34 18 21 148 1201835 34 24 17 106 119 38 16 34 24 28 149 120 23 17 34 27 04 107 119 34 25 34 20 36 150 120 26 29 34 24 39 108 119 39 52 342052 151 120 24 00 34 22 13 109 119 26 14 34 18 34 152 120 26 32 34 22 10 110 119 26 01 341603 153 1171808 32 48 35 111 119 27 55 341606 154 117 19 48 32 49 04 112 119 27 30 341334 159 117 19 45 32 42 07 113 119 24 36 34 11 22 160 117 20 13 32 41 DO 114 119 28 19 34 12 35 162 117 20 23 32 42 00 115 119 32 26 34 17 03 165 1171726 32 40 58 116 1192938 34 13 54 166 117 1 B 35 32 38 55 117 119 34 03 341243 167 1171946 32 38 60 118 119 37 28 341759 172 1171952 32 37 27 119 119 34 27 341704 174 117 57 16 33 36 23 120 119 38 88 341708 175 117 58 21 33 36 28 121 119 35 48 34 14 24 176 117 56 03 33 35 46 122 119 36 48 3411 58 177 117 56 14 33 34 02 123 117 15 41 32 38 49 178 117 58 01 33 34 28 124 119 39 56 34 12 56 179 117 58 38 33 32 34 125 119 45 05 34 14 22 180 118 00 17 33 34 31 126 119 30 22 341213 181 118 00 16 33 35 30 127 119 41 23 34 23 47 182 118 02 24 33 35 52 128 119 46 23 34 23 39 183 118 03 66 33 36 20 129 119 43 09 34 19 58 184 118 05 02 33 36 00 130 119 39 37 341821 185 118 02 47 33 34 55 131 119 44 47 341839 186 117 56 21 33 33 20 132 119 48 15 34 23 55 187 118 20 36 33 42 15 133 119 46 13 34 19 54 188 118 22 06 33 42 46 134 119 49 04 3421 33 189 1181927 33 40 16 135 11951 03 34 22 36 190 118 23 21 33 42 32 136 119 56 36 34 23 13 191 118 25 33 33 43 24 137 119 58 42 34 25 35 192 118 20 36 3341 43 13B 120 00 49 34 25 40 193 118 34 OB 3401 08 139 120 02 58 34 26 19 194 118 36 22 3401 13 140 120 05 02 34 25 38 195 118 32 00 3400 12 C00® Y d 3 $ HZ:tT CB/ZT/TT Design 1 Point ID Longitude Latitude Point ID Longitude Latitude 196 118 32 00 33 59 00 239 118 28 05 3351 46 197 118 34 42 33 59 04 240 1182752 33 50 54 198 118 35 32 34 00 30 241 118 28 16 33 50 03 199 118 36 42 33 5B 23 242 118 28 53 33 49 17 200 118 37 00 33 58 55 243 118 29 58 33 50 54 2D1 118 36 47 3401 03 244 118 26 41 33 48 32 202 118 41 21 34 DO 34 245 118 27 43 33 46 51 203 118 43 13 34 00 57 246 118 28 02 33 49 20 204 118 29 64 33 59 48 247 1102827 33 47 13 205 118 28 48 33 57 05 248 118 26 57 33 49 32 206 118 30 D6 33 57 51 249 11 B 25 50 33 48 55 207 1182904 33 55 06 250 118 26 24 33 47 51 20B 118 28 46 335419 261 118 26 47 33 47 22 209 118 26 47 33 53 03 252 118 28 25 33 47 35 210 118 30 31 33 53 32 253 118 30 08 33 49 43 211 11 B 3142 33 53 49 254 118 29 24 33 48 50 212 1183044 33 54 01 255 118 34 36 3351 14 213 118 28 59 33 52 22 256 118 35 56 3351 64 214 11831 07 3351 35 257 118 33 11 33 54 15 215 118 31 23 33 52 41 25B 116 33 03 33 52 56 216 118 33 58 33 58 15 259 118 33 05 33 52 36 217 118 36 10 33 56 55 260 11831 51 33 50 02 218 118 33 05 33 57 31 261 118 32 17 33 49 40 219 118 33 56 33 56 55 262 118 32 49 33 50 53 220 118 32 01 336511 263 118 33 07 33 50 14 221 118 34 01 33 56 15 264 118 32 00 3351 49 222 118 32 12 33 57 00 265 118 30 21 3351 02 223 11831 29 33 55 47 266 118 30 45 3,35021 224 118 30 5B 335458 297 1183605 33 50 07 225 118 32 42 33 54 55 268 118 44 21 340004 226 118 33 26 33 54 57 269 118 43 05 33 59 14 227 118 35 24 335306 270 118 46 38 33 59 12 228 118 38 OB 33 54 27 271 118 46 53 33 58 30 229 118 34 42 33 56 07 272 118 40 05 34 00 34 230 118 35 17 33 54 40 273 118 39 51 33 58 23 231 118 25 44 33 53 18 274 118 40 50 33 59 OB 232 118 26 04 335063 275 1183804 33 57 52 233 118 25 00 334861 276 118 38 18 33 53 15 234 1182505 33 48 17 277 118 37 29 33 53 30 235 118 24 11 33 43 52 278 118 36 27 3351 38 236 118 26 25 33 45 55 237 118 28 20 33 50 16 238 118 29 26 33 50 53 too In V d 8 4 6Z:tT CB/ZT/TT x�Is�a HSLI H014 S3,LIS xOU3=00 agcl s aSSOCIOHJ 30 xOLLV00'I a MCI adds' `lI 1 � i • Q A r Jt f tr; .1 • R / 3 i • 6 V • i\ INT i' l 1 w laIII. a dvwH rely tllaij} m TnuoJ C o _ - � r . '. .r , ; � • �� < ..,� • _� �►. / v ' i i� /r n' r �� ti ��'y � � ,, �ry�� F � 7ii t, � Fr •. � � Fr• ffr � f � vo / •�� �� rt t ��� a �' / APPENDIX D COORDINATES OF PROPOSED SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES FOR FISH DESIGN Design 4 Point ID Longitude Latitude Point ID Longitude Latitude 371 117 29 29 33 15 50 414 117 31 06 33 19 03 372 117 30 54 33 18 10 415 117 33 55 33 15 58 373 11721 28 33 06 14 416 117 36 59 33 18 54 374 117 22 11 32 44 44 417 117 22 43 32 35 12 375 117 23 30 32 34 23 418 117 20 06 32 34 48 376 117 25 47 32 38 57 419 11721 45 32 32 53 377 11721 09 32 38 28 420 11751 02 33 34 26 378 117 20 25 32 34 22 421 117 43 08 33 26 50 379 117 36 07 33 18 23 422 117 35 30 33 16 46 380 11811 49 33 40 35 423 118 02 21 33 39 51 381 11811 36 33 42 38 424 118 04 19 33 40 53 382 118 07 28 33 37 12 425 11801 07 33 37 19 383 118 13 39 33 34 33 426 117 54 21 33 35 52 364 118 28 45 33 54 04 427 1181255 33 40 12 385 118 27 54 33 52 36 428 118 16 13 33 42 03 386 118 45 09 3401 05 429 118 07 54 33 43 49 387 11901 05 34 03 54 430 118 07 57 33 40 51 388 119 23 40 34 15 34 431 11811 37 33 43 18 389 119 14 22 34 06 34 432 118 07 12 33 34 44 390 119 20 27 34 11 32 433 1181051 33 33 17 391 119 14 34 34 08 42 434 118 32 12 34 00 15 392 11921 46 34 08 18 435 116 26 01 33 53 49 393 11931 52 34 22 32 436 118 37 22 3401 43 394 119 35 33 3421 03 437 118 37 11 33 58 32 395 119 33 30 341045 438 118 40 22 33 58 51 396 119 33 01 34 19 08 439 118 33 06 33 49 26 397 119 26 49 341417 440 118 24 22 33 50 22 398 119 24 51 34 13 42 441 118 41 29 3401 13 399 119 41 47 341334 442 118 50 43 3401 29 400 119 47 17 34 22 40 443 119 03 30 34 03 20 401 11941 05 34 20 49 444 118 56 07 34 02 09 402 119 44 47 34 14 53 445 1191730 341302 403 120 01 36 34 23 14 446 119 20 37 341409 404 120 07 01 34 26 53 447 119 19 40 34 12 33 405 119 58 34 34 24 53 448 119 27 01 34 20 53 406 120 11 27 34 25 32 449 119 17 28 34 05 45 407 120 19 19 34 25 10 450 1191909 34 09 57 408 120 21 48 34 23 34 451 11921 43 34 07 48 409 120 25 24 34 22 45 452 1191653 34 08 41 410 117 09 01 32 34 47 453 1190741 34 05 10 411 117 10 43 32 38 13 454 1191410 34 04 33 412 117 30 34 33 16 57 455 119 35 29 34 23 53 413 11731 35 33 14 43 456 119 36 16 3411 10 TTOIn P d 3 a SC:tT C6/lT/TT Design 4 Point ID Longitude Latitude Point ID Longitude Latitude 457 119 36 03 34 14 24 500 1181855 3341 51 458 119 37 18 34 16 20 501 118 19 11 3341 32 459 119 26 46 341006 502 118 31 27 33 55 25 460 119 29 26 341046 503 118 32 25 33 57 20 461 119 39 46 341209 504 118 34 34 33 58 20 462 119 43 07 34 18 32 505 118 28 29 33 51 38 463 119 42 40 34 18 33 506 118 30 58 33 52 32 464 120 03 65 34 23 53 507 118 33 31 33 54 44 465 120 01 30 34 23 27 505 118 34 20 33 56 12 466 120 17 46 34 25 25 509 118 34 01 33 53 56 467 120 19 15 34 24 55 510 118 32 63 33 52 24 468 120 26 23 34 22 59 511 118 31 23 3351 10 469 120 26 29 34 26 36 512 118 32 30 33 51 58 470 117 17 15 32 44 54 513 118 26 28 33 45 02 471 1171641 32 46 50 514 1182710 33 46 41 472 117 20 19 32 37 20 515 118 28 13 33 49 49 473 1171709 32 42 32 516 118 28 23 33 48 00 474 117 19 16 32 43 56 517 118 29 17 33 49 48 475 117 16 37 32 39 47 518 118 22 44 33 43 21 476 117 17 56 32 40 12 519 118 25 47 33 43 53 477 117 19 64 324061 478 117 19 01 324200 479 117 20 10 3241 15 480 117 17 22 32 49 06 481 117 19 53 32 46 52 482 1171941 32 48 46 483 1171859 32 45 12 484 117 20 31 32 44 40 485 117 20 34 324656 486 117 20 56 32 47 58 487 117 21 59 32 45 24 488 1176703 33 33 09 489 117 59 04 33 32 33 490 117 59 41 33 36 11 491 118 00 59 33 34 67 492 118 02 09 33 33 53 493 118 02 39 33 36 38. 494 118 04 21 33 36 06 495 118 04 43 33 36 05 496 117 56 25 33 33 58 497 117 56 24 33 35 39 498 117 57 04 33 34 00 499 117 58 58 - 33 35 43 ZTOPi Y d 3 Wtl CB/ZT/TT " r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS /Il\•'! OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA R.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 � 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92706-7018 �s�xcc�•u�` (714)962-2411 January 7, 1994 M. James Allen, Ph.D. Southern California Coastal Water Research Project 7171 Fenwick Lane Westminster, CA 92653-5218 Subject: CSDOC's Southern California Bight Pilot Project (SCBPP) Sampling Effort The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the information that you requested in your December 13, 1993 letter to Dr. Irwin Haydock. The information should be considered preliminary since any changes to our mandated sampling efforts under our NPDES permit must he agreed upon by both EPA Region IX and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. Keeping in mind the suggested 35% to 15% split of effort between SCBPP and the Districts' sampling effort, we also had to reserve enough samples, distributed over our mandatory stations, to answer compliance questions. Therefore, primary emphasis in choosing which stations to retain was based on their utility in illustrating permit compliance for our outfall. To demonstrate compliance we required some degree of replication for statistical analysis. To fill in our areal coverage analysis we will be able to utilize the SCBPP stations that occur within our study area. If you should have any questions please let me know. CGcyeo Georg Robertson Senior Environmental Specialist CR:.. REF"2IXX*I.TR Attachment cc: Irwin Havdock Andrew Lissner Charlie Phillips Doug Diener Rich Gossett Fred O'Brien/Richard Santangelo i CSDOC Draft Proposal #I - January 7, 1994 (GLR) ATTACHMENT 1 ANSWERS TO LOGISTICS QUESTIONS 1 4 1) Which compliance monitoring stations should the Districts retain for the summer quarter of 1994? A breakout by percentage is given below. These stations represent the Districts preliminary proposal on which stations should be preserved for the summer quarter of 1994: Program Stations Retained Total Percent Comments Element Samples Saved Water CON I, 1, 9, 37 360 33% See Appendix 1 Quality Sediment CON I, 0, ZB, C, 10, 1, 4, 9, 23 29%a See Appendix '_ Chemistry 12, 37, C2, 34, 11, 15, 44, 24, 39 Benthic CON 1, 0, ZB, C, Ill, 1, 4, 9, 23 23% See Appendix 2 Infauna 12, 37, C2, 34, 11, 15, 44, 24, 39 Trawling Tl, T11 2 15% See Appendix 3 Fish Tl, Tl1 9 15% See Appendix 3 Chemistry 2) How far will the Districts vessel go beyond our existing monitoring area? See Figures 1-3 and Tables 2-3 in Appendices 1-3. 3) Should samples be randomly allocated to benthic and chemistry laboratories or should each laboratory do the samples that are nearest to their outfalls? Districts' staff suggest that we analyze all samples taken from the vicinity of our outfall. This should ensure that the SCBPP/EMAP data can be used to supplement our reduced summer compliance monitoring effort. CSDOC Draft Proposal #1 - January 7, 1994 (OLR) 4) Can tradeoffs be made where the Districts existing sampling and/or analytical efforts are greater than needed for the SCBPP? Yes. With the concurrence of EPA and the RWQCB, the Districts has the flexibilitv to reallocate efforts to other areas. However, this process must be expedited since a new contract must be approved by the Districts' Board of Directors prior to July 1, 1994. This means that the final decisions on reallocating funds need to be decided by mid-April 1994 at the latest. 2 CSDOC Sampling Effort Southern California Bight Central Area: EMAP Design #1 Sr ��4 [•\10f\ yl all ,. w O = EMHP Stations we' ll sample N� 0 10 L�Ht t� S1 - t j+ n ,v, ; kHometm i 7 n V A CSDOC Sampling Effo� Southern California Bight Southern Area: EMAP Design 1 tilt �` y . " r. _ 1 O = EMRP Stations ue' l l sample 1:-lNe' npyn 0 IO ]noIIICII9 1 ¢w � r- Fig. 2 4 b Southern California Bight At." F Central Area: EhW Design #4 113CSDOC J, y (,, !'1'• Fish Trawl Survey li ,i,n 111•IIQ,��Y It 1• Vi `12• All III \ 0 10 Lam: M `JI I1 I \ All I (J"A j A kflojnctcm -.A a . INNI 90 or 85% of present efforts to SCBP SCBPP Saved 10 or 15% of present effort saved No. Saaples 14 2 CSDOC Draft Proposal #1 - January 7, 1994 (GLR) Appendix 1 Water Quality Sampling The proposed offshore water quality sampling for the summer of 1994 is designed to meet compliance testing while contributing approximately 67% of the Districts sampling effort to the SCBPP. The Districts normally takes 35 "samples" (i.e. stations) during the summer quarter [July (n=17), August (n=9) and September (n=9)]. The Districts' permit stipulates that we take samples at the surface (0.3 m), at 2 on above the bottom and at 6 m intervals throughout the water column. During stratified conditions (eg summer quarter) additional samples are taken at 3 to intervals through the thermocline. For a typical summer quarter this approximates 420 "sampling sites" (eg number of stations x sampling depths). The Districts sample for ammonia and TSS at each sampling site for sub-total of 840 samples collected. Additionally, the Districts sample for fecal coliforms at four stations at all depths (n= 156) and for O&G at three depths (n=105) for a total of approximately 1,100 samples during July, August and September. For compliance purposes the Districts will sample monthly at four 60 m stations (Figure 1-1). At these stations we propose to sample for fecal coliforms and ammonia at five discrete depths with replication (Table 1-1). Past data has shown that TSS and O&G are not reliable indicators of the Districts plume. It has also been recommended to EPA and RWQCB to drop both TSS and O&G from our program and apply those resources for other analyses. In order to obtain enough sampling effort for SCBPP sampling outside the Districts' study area, these parameters need to be dropped for the summer of 1994. The Districts will collect 360 samples distributed over three months leaving the remainder of our water quality sampling effort for the SCBPP. Since the SCBPP sampling utilizes only CTD data this should allow the Districts to cover the same Design #1 SCBPP stations (n=33) as we will do for the benthic infauna and sediment chemistry sampling (Tables 1-2 and 1-3). 6 30M 20u.... ...... lou' Huntington NT Beach Newporl Beach 40M•. ..... '• ""•e183 Districts G175 e174 . C�1C�Bt ...........• .•+ 6 0 Boy........ ... ... ....... ' �•..... .. .,, . e182 e39 San Gabriel ..:.., .............. :: .: .. .Canyon • ....... e181 ......:::Ne'"wrl 100M.... .....;...... .......................................... .................................: ...: :.:Gpnyalr.. ......1.............. .. ... 300IA. .. ..... sss° .................................. 1 KM 1I 400M 119.1 ° 116.0 ° Proposed Water Ouality Sampling Stations Pig. 1-1 Summer 1994 SCBPP Survey 940107gir CSDOC Draft Proposal #1 - January 7, 1994 (GLR) Table 1-1: NPDES Compliance Monitoring Stations for SCBPP. Parameters Frequency Stations Rep Depths CTD Monthly (Jul-Sept) CON I, 1, 9, 1 CTD: Surface to 1 at 37 above bottom a 1 m intervals fecal coliforms, 3 Discrete Samples: NH,- Surface, above thermocline, below thermocline, half distance between thermocline and bottom, bottom Table 1-2: SCBPP Sampling Stations (Design #1) within Districts' study area. Parameters Frequency Stations Depths CTD July/August 38, 39, 174, 175, 176, 178, Surface to I m 180, 181, 182, 183, 194, above bottom C 185 1 at intervals Table 1-3: SCBPP Sampling Stations (Design #1) outside Districts' study area. Parameters Frequency Stations Depths CTD July/August 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, Surface to I m 20, 21, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, above bottom C 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 43 1 at intervals 8 CSDOC Draft Proposal #I - January 7, 1994 (GLR) Appendix 2 Sediment Chemistry and Benthic Infauna The proposed benthic sampling is designed to both provide sufficient areal coverage (utilizing SCBPP stations) as well as answer compliance questions related to within-ZID, ZID boundary and reference stations. For sediment chemistry and benthic infauna sampling the Districts will contribute approximately 71% and 78%, respectively, of its mandated summer quarter monitoring effort for SCBPP. The Districts' summer sampling effort is two fold with a compliance component focused on replicated sampling (n=3 for sediment chemistry; n=5 for benthic infauna) at 13 60 m stations and an areal component comprising of single samples at 40 stations located at various depths and locations around the Districts outfall. The total sampling effort for the summer quarter 79 samples for sediment chemistry and 105 samples for benthic infauna. For compliance purposes, the Districts proposes replicate sampling at three 60 m stations and single samples at an additional 14 stations (Figure 2-I; Table 2-1). At this level of effort the Districts should be able reallocate enough resources to sample the SCBPP stations within our study area as well as sample additional SCBPP stations from Oceanside to Alimitos Bay (Tables 2-2 and 2-3)(n=33). 9 30M 20A1" IOAI Huntington N T 9each Newport Beach • ....3.4 '.............0..'..... . . Dislrlcts'"'�� 4175 e174 SRM...e34.. outloll 18 { it 60M......... ... 15 . . ..'.. e182 . . . . .Gg. e39 Stln GoDriel i ' •....., e181 ....Ncw�il + Con on •..... .... .. p° 0 1OOM.... y ••.... ..... ................................. .. ..................................,... .::Gpnyon. ..'..... .....a 7 80... 9 .. 336 '200µ...g4 ': •ell 85 ............, 0 Z9. . 4 . ... . ......................... 12 .... 24 ... 3Ul]fM, 39 '•, ss o ................................... 1 KM 40bM 118.1 0 118.0 0 Proposed Benthic Sampling Stations Fig. 2-1 Summer 1994 SCBPP Survey 940107gir CSDOC Draft Proposal #1 - January 7, 1994 (GLR) Table 2-1: NPDES Compliance Monitoring Stations for SCBPP. Parameters Frequency Stations Rep Sediment Chemistry and July/August CON 1. 0, ZB 3 Benthic Infauna C. 10, 1, 4, 9, 12, 37, C2, 34, 11, 1 15. 44, 24, 39 Table 2-2: SCBPP Sampling Stations (Design #I) within_Districts' study area. Parameters I Frequency Stations Sediment Chemistry and July/August 38. 39, 174, 175, 176, 175, 150, 151, 182, Benthic Infauna 183. I84, 185 Table 2-3: SCBPP Sampling Stations (Design #1) outside Districts' study area. Parameters Frequency Stations Sediment Chemistry and July/August 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, IX, 20, 21, 2_7, 28, Benthic Infauna 29, 30, 31, 32, 33. 34, 35, 36, 37, 43 CSDOC Draft Proposal #1 - January 7, 1994 (GLR) - Appendix 3 Demersal Fish/Invertebrates and Fish Tissue Chemistry The proposed trawl sampling (faunal and chemistry) is designed to provide comparison between outfall and reference trawl stations. Further analysis can be completed utilizing SCBPP stations that occur within the Districts sampling area. The Districts will contribute approximately 85% of its mandated summer quarter monitoring effort for SCBPP for both program elements. The Districts summer sampling effort normally takes two replicate trawls at eight stations for a total effort of 16 samples. We also take approximately 60 (catch dependent) batch samples for tissue analysis. For the summer quarter of 1994 the Districts proposes to sample two (Tl and Tl1) of its mandated trawl stations with no replication (Figure 3-1; Table 3-1) and analyze nine tissue chemistry samples from these two stations. This will leave 16 samples (eg stations) and 51 tissue chemistry samples to be allocated to SCBPP (Tables 3-2 and 3-3). 12 Huntington N T •"•...., Beach Newport Beach 40M•. a491 ., ...., �............. .., Districts' .Sf1M....... , e09tloll ' 6oM ....... Sdn Gabriel •''"• e499 ........." " ' Canyon ........trt :: �• YDDM.... ••....;......, ........ ................. ........ .........................:....: .......... '26GIi.,.F...... �nrtM9T........... ........�' ... ... ........,, ................................. e496 100K1, i sss° . : ... ................................................ 1 KM 400M t 11e.1 119.0 ^ . Proposed Districts Trawl Stations Fig. 3-1 Summer t p94 SCBPP Survey 940107gir CSDOC Draft Proposal #1 - January 7, 1994 (GLR) Table 3.1: NPDES Compliance Monitoring for Otter Trawls. Parameters Frequency Stations Rep Demersal Fish/ Invertebrates July/August Tl, Tll 1 and Fish Tissue Chemistry' '9 batch samples taken over Tl and T1 I Table 3-2: SCBPP Sampling Stations (Design #4) within Districts' study area. Parameters Frequency Stations Demersal Fish/ Invertebrates July/August 490, 491, 493, 494, 495, 496, 497, and Fish Tissue Chemistry 498, 499 Table 3-3: SCBPP Sampling Stations (Design #4) outside Districts' study area. Parameters Frequency Stations Demersal Fish/ Invertebrates July/August 382, 420, 423, 424, 425, 432 and Fish Tissue Chemistry 14 RESOLUTION NO. 94- APPROVING AMENDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR THE OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICT AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NOS. 79-176, 81-166 AND 83-188 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 81-166 adopted by the Boards of Directors on October 14, 1981, the District approved and adopted a revised deferred compensation plan (hereinafter referred to as the -Plan'-) , and, by Resolution No. 83-188 adopted by the Boards of Directors on December 14, 1983, the District approved and adopted an amendment to the Plan; and, WHEREAS, certain changes in the federal law and regulations pertaining to deferred compensation plans adopted and administered by public agencies have been enacted subsequent to the adoption and amendment of the Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors desire to again amend the Plan to comply with such new federal law and regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 (as 1 set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as though set forth herein at length) is hereby adopted and shall remain in effect until amended or terminated by resolution of the Boards of Directors. Section 2. That Resolution Nos. 79-176, 81-166 and 83-188 are hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held this _ day of 1994 . (L495X) R:2/16/94 2 �4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS el ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA 1094 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92729.9121 March 18, 1994 M419922411 STAFF REPORT VEHICLE USAGE This report is in response to a request by Directors at the March 9, 1994 meeting of the Joint Boards of Directors for information on the use of Districts' vehicles by employees during both working hours and off-hours. The Districts have a total of 390 vehicles; of this total, 38 are sedans, 77 are pickup trucks and 26 are vans and utility vehicles. Of these, 24 are assigned to the motor pool for general use, 19 are assigned full-time to certain employees and are driven home, and the balance of 98 are assigned to specific divisions and remain at the Districts for use during work hours. The Districts also have 70 larger trucks and heavy-equipment vehicles and 179 electric carts used during working hours in the accomplishment of various tasks. Certain employees are assigned radio equipped vehicles full-time and authorized to drive them home to allow direct response to emergencies during off-hours at Plant Number 1 or 2, at pump stations throughout the various Districts and at construction sites in the field. Each of these 19 employees are on-call 24 hours per day 7 days per week. Although these employees use the vehicles to travel to and from work and respond to emergencies, they are not authorized to use the vehicles for personal use nor to let any non-Districts individual operate or be transported in the vehicle. Employees who are assigned vehicles, or who use motor pool vehicles, are subject to the Districts' Fleet Safety Program Policy (see attachment) that specifies the conditions for use as well as other requirements. The vehicles specifically authorized for 24-hour use are assigned as follows: Operations - 2 Vehicles. The Chief Operators at Plants 1 and 2 are responsible for the plant operations on an around the clock basis in conformance with NPDES Permit requirements. Each of the Chief Operators return to the plant to supervise Plant Operators working the a.m. and p.m. shifts, and respond to emergencies or potentially hazardous situations occurring at the plants from 20 to 25 times per year. Maintenance - 10 Vehicles. Each of the five Facilities Managers responsible for plant maintenance, collections facilities, electrical maintenance, instrumentation and Staff Report - Vehicle Usage March 18, 1994 page 2 mechanical maintenance are assigned a vehicle to allow them to respond directly to major emergencies in-plant or throughout the various Districts at pump stations and along 850 miles of trunk sewers. Facilities Managers each respond between five and twenty times per year. Each of the five Maintenance Divisions, Plant Maintenance, Collections Facilities, Electrical Maintenance, Instrumentation and Mechanical Maintenance are assigned a fully-equipped pickup truck for use by standby personnel during off-shifts and weekends in responding directly to emergencies in-plant or throughout the various Districts at pump stations and along 850 miles of trunk sewers. Personnel on standby duty are authorized to drive the pickup truck home. Standby crews are called between five and seven times per week, or up to 360 times per year. Engineering - 7 Vehicles. The Construction Manager, Engineering Manager, Chief Construction Inspector and Supervising Construction Inspector are each assigned a vehicle to facilitate their travel to construction sites throughout the Districts and to respond directly to construction emergencies. Each of these individuals are called to respond during off-hours between six and ten times per year. The Planning and Design Manager for the plants was temporarily assigned a vehicle in response to the threat of a work action in January. Two vehicles are assigned to Senior Construction Inspectors for use in sewer construction inspection activities during off-hours. In addition to the vehicles specifically authorized for 24-hour use listed above, a small number of vehicles are occasionally driven home to facilitate the accomplishment of certain intermittent activities. Technical Services. In conformance with EPA requirements, the site of Ag Tech Inc. , a biosolid reuse contractor, must be inspected twice monthly. Ag Tech is located in Yuma, Arizona, and staff usually departs directly from home at approximately 3 :00 a.m. The vehicle used for this purpose is normally garaged in the motor pool compound. Under the terms and conditions of the Industrial Waste Discharge permit issued for the operation of the Stringfellow Groundwater Treatment Plant in western Riverside County, Districts' Source Control Inspectors must visit the site whenever treated water is delivered to the Santa Ana River Interceptor which is tributary to the Staff Report - Vehicle Usage March 18, 1994 page 3 Districts' wastewater treatment facilities. This responsibility is rotated between the Source Control inspection staff. When the duty falls to an inspector residing in the north end of our service area, they report directly to the Stringfellow site to save time and expense. This occurs approximately 30 times per year. The Source Control monitoring and enforcement program includes night down-streaming of industries suspected of attempting to violate their permits by dumping at night . Two inspectors are assigned as a team to accomplish this work for reasons of safety. Investigations, which consist of placing sampling devices in sewer manholes immediately upstream and downstream of the suspected permittee's sewer connection, run for ten consecutive nights. These activities are conducted from between 50 and 100 nights per year. Personnel. The vehicle assigned to Security is driven home by the Security Supervisor approximately 50 times per year. It is used for security patrol of both plants during the evening and early morning hours and to supervise the activities of Security Guards assigned during those hours. It is also occasionally driven home to allow for immediate response to potential threats to either plant or employee security or other anticipated incidents such as an intense rainstorm. ATTACHMENT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FLEET SAFETY PROGRAM POLICY The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) is committed to providing a safe and healthful work environment for all employees. An integral part of the overall safety program is fleet safety. Nationwide, vehicle accidents represent more than thirty-six percent of all workplace fatalities. The safety of Districts personnel and the public is of the highest priority. Most motor vehicle accidents can be avoided. The Districts goal is to decrease the number of vehicle accidents which result in bodily injury and/or equipment damage. The procedures and rules contained in the Fleet Safety Program apply to all employees who operate either Districts vehicles or their personal vehicles, either on or off Districts property, in the course of Districts business. VEHICLE USE AUTHORIZATION A valid California Drivers License is required before an employee can be authorized to operate a Districts vehicle or a personal vehicle for Districts business. The Personnel Department will verify the status of each employees driver's license and report restrictions or suspension to the employee's Division Manager. After the Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) record verification, each Division Manager will determine which employees need to be authorized to operate Districts vehicles or personal vehicles for Districts business. It is the responsibility of each Division Manager to ensure that all authorized personnel receive the proper training prior to driving. Family members or acquaintances are not authorized to drive a Districts owned vehicle. The Districts is not responsible for accidents that occur outside the scope of employment and will not provide defense or indemnity in such a case. Authorized drivers shall not transport family members or acquaintances in Districts vehicles, unless it is work-related. EMPLOYEE TRAINING All employees required to operate a motor vehicle in the course of employment must attend Fleet Safety Training. This training consists of 1) an orientation to the Districts Fleet Safety Program, 2) Defensive Driving, and if applicable, 3) Commercial Drivers License Training and appropriate equipment orientations. 1 i W DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE RECORDS A current DMV report is obtained by the Personnel Department at the time of initial employment. A DMV report is obtained annually for all other employees. The Personnel Department will receive a current DMV report if the employee has any activity such as a citation, accident, or license suspension. The DMV report is available in the Personnel Department for employee review. If an employee's driver license has been suspended, the employee is not authorized to operate Districts vehicles or their personal vehicle for Districts business under any circumstances. An exception to this is if DMV allows the employee to drive in the course of employment and the Safety and Health Manager and the department head elect to authorize driving privileges. Driving privileges may be reinstated once the suspension is removed by the DMV. If an employee has had numerous moving violations or avoidable accidents, the employee's authorized driving privileges may be removed by the employee's department head and the Safety & Health Manager. TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS If an employee receives a citation for a traffic violation while driving a Districts vehicle or driving a personal vehicle while on Districts business, the employee must inform his/her supervisor immediately upon return from the business. The supervisor will immediately inform the Safety and Health Manager. The employee is responsible for payment of any fines or penalties. USE OF PERSONAL VEHICLE In the event that a Districts vehicle is not available for employee use, an authorized employee may opt to use their personal vehicle for Districts business. The use of a personal vehicle must be approved by the employee's supervisor. The employee must obey all aspects of the Districts' Fleet Safety Program while operating their personal vehicle for Districts business. In the event of an accident involving the employee's personal vehicle, the employee's vehicle liability insurance will afford primary coverage. If damages exceed the employee's policy limits, excess coverage will be provided by the Districts absent malice or willful misconduct on behalf of the employee. Such misconduct could include, but is not limited to, driving under the influence of.alcohol or controlled substances. 2 OCCUPANT RESTRAINT SYSTEMS FOR DRIVER AND PASSENGERS The number of passengers in the vehicle should never exceed the number of seat belts. The driver and all passengers must wear a seat belt while on Districts business. Seat belt use is mandated by law for all vehicle occupants. This requirement applies whether the vehicle is Districts owned, rented, leased, or employee owned. SUBSTANCE ABUSE Pursuant to the Districts' Substance Abuse Policy, employees shall not use or be under the influence of alcohol or any non-prescription drugs while on Districts' business. Use of prescription and over-the-counter medications is permitted as long as they will not impair the employee's ability to drive. RENTAL and LEASED VEHICLES All Districts employees must comply with the Fleet Safety Program while operating rented or leased vehicles for Districts business. When renting a vehicle for business purposes, it is not necessary to buy any insurance offered by the car rental company. The Districts are self-insured and the use of rental vehicles is covered. PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS All employees who are required to obtain a Commercial Drivers License in order to operate Districts vehicles must successfully pass the physical examination required by the DMV. The Districts will provide the medical examination through an approved medical facility. INSPECTION Employees are required to conduct a visual inspection of any vehicle prior to use for Districts business. The vehicle driver is held responsible for the condition of the vehicle. If a fleet vehicle is used, the employee is required to conduct a visual inspection of the vehicle for body damage before and after use. All damage must be reported to the employee's supervisor and the motor pool supervisor. An accident report must be completed and distributed. 3 i l 4y ACCIDENT REPORTING AND INVESTIGATION Accident investigation is a systematic method for documenting factual data that can reveal accident causes- whether driving error,vehicle failure, or other conditions. All vehicle accidents must be investigated as soon as the driver is aware that an accident has occurred unless the employee is prevented from doing so due to injury. Physical evidence is usually short lived and if it is not documented immediately after the accident, it may be lost forever. Document evidence by photographs or drawing a diagram of the accident scene. Characteristics of the area and roadway should be noted. Note the position and condition of both vehicles on the diagram. Obtain the names, addresses, and phone numbers for the driver and passengers and document any injuries. When talking to the witnesses, record both facts and opinions. The Vehicle Accident Report is designed to assist in the collection of data at the scene of the accident. If necessary, use additional sheets of paper to record information about the accident. Note: The Vehicle Accident Report is located in each Districts vehicle with an explanation on proper completion and distribution. In the event of an accident in a Districts vehicle or a personal vehicle used for Districts business, the following instructions must be followed. DRIVER/PASSENGER o If safe, stop immediately and determine possible damage. Avoid obstructing traffic if possible. o Aid the injured and see to it that they receive medical attention as soon as possible. o If the vehicle is equipped with a radio, call the Control Center and have the Control Center Clerk call the local police. If the vehicle does not have a radio, call the police from a nearby telephone and call your supervisor. Request assistance in the investigation process if necessary. NOTE: A police report is needed when the accident Involves the public. If the police do not respond, the employee should obtain all pertinent information available from the other driver and the accident scene and then go to the police department with local jurisdiction to file a report. o Identify as many witnesses as possible and obtain their name, address, and home and work phone numbers. o Do not discuss the accident with anyone other than the police and Districts personnel. Provide only your name, company name and address, and work telephone number. 4 o The driver, and each employee passenger, and each employee witness should complete the Vehicle Accident Report during the shift in which the accident occurred. SUPERVISOR o The Safety and Health Manager must be notified of the accident as soon as possible by either telephone or pager. o Conduct an accident investigation (atthe accident scene of possible) and determine actions to prevent accident recurrence. o Approve Vehicle Accident Report. o The completed and approved Vehicle Accident Report must be delivered to the Safety and Health office and the Division Manager before the end of the shift. If the accident occurs during evening, weekend, or holiday hours, the Vehicle Accident Report shall be distributed at the beginning of the next week day shift. DIVISION MANAGER o Determine if participation in the investigation at the scene of the accident is warranted. This decision is based on personal injury and the severity of the equipment/property damage. o Review and approve the Vehicle Accident Report. o Ensure that actions to prevent accident recurrence are completed and documented. Send written verification of completion to the Safety and Health Manager. SAFETY and HEALTH MANAGER o Participate in the investigation at the scene of the accident if the accident resulted in personal injury and\or significant equipment/property damage. o Review the Vehicle Accident Report and determine if an additional investigation is warranted. o Approve the Vehicle Accident Report. o The Safety and Health Manager will forward copies of the Vehicle Accident Report to the Office of General Counsel, the General Manager, the Board Secretary, and the motor pool supervisor. o Track completed and outstanding actions to prevent accident recurrence. o Prepare quarterly vehicle accident data analysis. 5 M COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 91 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 101144 RUE AVENUE vo eon e+21 FOUNTAIN VALLEV.GLIF08NN192Rb8121 01919 4?A11 RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS APRIL 13, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. FUND NO 9199 - JT 01ST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/03194 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 D COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �-� CLAIMS PAID 03/09/94 POSTING DATE 03/09/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 136094 AG TECH COMPANY $63,299.10 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 136095 AMERICAN TELEPHONE&TELEGRAPH $989.10 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 136098 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $788.73 LAB SUPPLIES 136097 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP. $34.604.23 ENGINE TESTING J-19 136098 AIR DUCT CLEANING $595.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 136099 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $323.25 LAB SUPPLIES 136100 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS,INC. $17,785.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O,S-&89 138101 STN-CLOUMBUS $230.63 SUBSCRIPTION >a 136102 AMICON,INC. $617.29 LAB SUPPLIES Gf 135103 ANALYSTS,INC. $1,657.10 MECHANICAL PARTS = 136104 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $194.06 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE C7 136105 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $115.09 OFFICE EQUIPMENT D 136108 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $275.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136107 ANTHONY'S MECH&MACHINE,INC. $264.23 MACHINE REPAIRS 130100 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $1.339.00 LAB SUPPLIES m 136109 ABC LABORATORIES $4,955.00 LAB SERVICES 3 136110 ARMOR-VAC $390.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES Rt 136111 ARTISTS GRAPHICS $1,005.00 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 00 136112 ASSOC.AOMINIS.&CONSULTANTS $150.00 DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS 136113 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $943.42 LAB SUPPLIES 136114 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $4.052.24 PAYROLL SERVICES n 136115 BMF CORP.FIRE PROTECTION CO. $300.00 FIRE PROTECTION SUPPLIES r 130116 BRW SAFETY&SUPPLY $1.783.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 138117 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS $11.09 PUBLICATION p 135118 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1,199.13 BATTERIES N 136119 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $5,756.34 LAB SUPPLIES 136120 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $417.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS .� 136121 BELL SECURITY $4,071.75 SECURITY SERVICES n 138122 J&H BERGE,INC. $275.93 LAB SUPPLIES --1 135123 610 TECH NET,INC. $37.75 COMPUTER SOFTWARE (n 136124 BLACK&VEATCH Sm.068.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI.46 136125 BOERINGER MANNHEIM $317.89 LAB SUPPLIES 136125 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $30.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 130127 BOOT BARN $405.80 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 136128 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC..INC. $8,864.07 LAB SUPPLIES 136129 BRIGHTWORK DEVELOPMENT $104.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 136130 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $16.49 ELECTRIC MOTOR 136131 BROWNELL ELECTRO,INC. $72.07 ELECTRICAL PARTS 136132 BUDGET JANITORIAL $185.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 136133 THE BURKE COMPANY $63.06 PAINT SUPPLIES 136134 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $316.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.&10.92 136135 CH2M HILL $21,440.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES J31 136136 CS COMPANY $6.925.74 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136137 CALTROL,INC. $929.11 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136138 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $4.073.81 TRUCK REPAIRS 136139 CALIFORNIA HARDWARE,CO. $90.80 TOOLS I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3103/94 PAGE 02 REPORTNUMBERAP43 ➢ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY N CLAIMS PAID 03/09/94 POSTING DATE 03/09/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136140 CALIF.SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FIN.OFFICERS $368.00 NOTICES&ADS 136141 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $8,887.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-34 136142 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $2.399.96 OFFICE FURNITURE 138143 CENTURY SAFETY INST.S SUPPLY $748.87 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1361" RBERGRATE/CHEMWEST $1,218.87 PUMP PARTS 136145 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $1.100.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 136146 COASTALMOTION $1,584.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES 135147 LORETTA L.COFFMAN $180.00 SEWER MAPS 136148 COLD SPRING HARBOR $165.65 LAB EQUIPMENT ➢ 136149 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $62.50 INSTRUMENT PART m 136150 COUCH&SONS $202,374.00 CONSTRUCTION 1-9 z 136151 COMPUTER PC INC. $ . INSTRUMENT PARTS C7 13615 COMPUSA,INC. $205.68 COMPUTER SOFTWARE ➢ 138153 CONNEL GM PARTS I DN $26 . §26.9494 TRUCK PARTS 136154 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $5,162.39 ELECTRIC PARTS 138155 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $4,491.23 ENGINE PARTS m 136156 COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT $9,500.00 SEWER REPAIRS 3 # 136158 CREATIVE SE VICSCREEN BU ARTS $$475.00 DECALS 136158 CUSIP SERVICE BUREAU $400.00 TAXABLE COMM PAPER SERVICES 136159 STATER TIRE FRS FEES $2$627.11 ANNUALIRES I 136161 DAPPER TIRE $150.00 TRUCK RENTAL EQUI ➢ ES 136162 DE IDECKENZA CORPORATION $534.27 INSTRUMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS f- 136163 DEPENDABLE CKER $150.00 INSTRUMENTPARTS r 136163 DEPENDABLE OFF-ROAD,INC. $150.00 TRUCK PARTS C 136164 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $9,490.64 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.&11-93 136165 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $1,595.13 PRINTING 136166 DIGENE DIAGNOSTICS $337.17 LAB SUPPLIES A 136167 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $879.30 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 136169 DOVER CORP. $319$820.00 LAB SUPPLIES ("1 136170 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $$69.79 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE ~ 136171 ROBERT F. RI ERA 662.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS (n 138171 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $127,562.00 INSURANCE PREMIUMS M.O.2-9-90 136172 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $2.306.39 PAINT SUPPLIES 136173 DYNIX $4,025.21 MECHANICAL PARTS 136174 E.C.S. $387.00 PUBLICATION 136175 EIL INSTRUMENTS,INC. $119.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136176 ERI INTER-BIO $11,098.25 LAB SERVICES 136177 ESP NORTH $1.146.01 VALVES 136178 EASTMAN,INC. $9,680.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136179 ENCHANTER,INC. $4.480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10.92 136180 ENTECH LAB AUTOMATION $2,107.80 LAB EQUIPMENT 136181 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $357.60 LAB SERVICES 136182 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $226A0 AIR FREIGHT 136183 FERRELLGAS $40.86 PROPANE 136184 FICOS APPLIANCE SERVICE $75.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 136185 FILTERLINE CORP. $124.76 PUMP PARTS ➢ N 4 FUND NO 9199 - IT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3103194 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY W CLAIMS PAID 03/09/94 POSTING DATE 03N9194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136186 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $9,148.41 FILTERS 136187 FISCHER 8 PORTER CO. $48.23 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 136188 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $337.51 LAB SUPPLIES 136189 FLOSYSTEMS $1,385.60 PUMP PARTS 136190 CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $9.855.30 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.&10-92 136191 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $335.35 PHOTO SUPPLIES 136192 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $20.20 PAINT SUPPLIES 136193 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $104.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS n 136194 THE FUTURE NOW $134.69 PRINTING 136195 GKD-USA,INC. $3,686.00 MECHANICAL PARTS m 136196 GET,INC. $2,028.20 LAB SUPPLIES Z 136197 GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS $18,120.00 RELOCATE TELEPHONE COMM EQUIPMENT y 136198 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $383.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136199 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $3.848.80 ELECTRIC PARTS 136200 GE COMPUTER SERVICE $1,098.14 RENTAL EQUIPMENT Tm71 136201 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $2,578.9D TELEPHONE SERVICES 3 136202 GEORGE LEECH 6 ASSOCIATES $207.64 INSTRUMENT PARTS ZM 136203 LIFE TECHNOLOGIES/GIBCO/BRL $114.82 LAB SUPPLIES 00 136204 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $20,007.39 MECHANICAL PARTS 1 136205 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $365.00 PUBLICATIONS 136206 W W GRAINGER,INC. $453.92 ELECTRIC PARTS r136207 GRASSY S.T.I. $4,924.15 ENGINE PARTS r 136208 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $28.02 PRINTING 136209 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $924.89 TRUCK PARTS t I 136210 HACH COMPANY $94.45 LAB SUPPLIES N 136211 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $352.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136212 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $621.74 ENGINE PARTS .� 136213 HEWLETT PACKARD $1,144.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT f"f 136214 HOEFER SCIENTIFIC INSTR. $491.50 LAB SUPPLIES -4 136215 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $188.62 COMPRESSOR PARTS N 136216 HOME DEPOT $136.43 HARDWARE 136217 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $362.60 PAINT SUPPLIES 136218 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $15,885.00 WATER USE 136219 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $1.181.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136220 IBM CORPICUSTOMER SUPPORT $2,451.72 OFFICE MACHINE 136221 IDEX% $403.95 LAB SUPPLIES 136222 IMAGING PLUS $608.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136223 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL - $67,301.36 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11.18.92 136224 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $518.28 CONNECTORS 136225 INGRAM PAPER $300.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136226 INTEGRATED CONTROLS $369.42 GAUGE 136227 CITY OF IRVINE $3,555.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS 136228 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.51 WATER USE 136229 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1.506.70 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 136230 JAYS CATERING $170.35 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 136231 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $302.64 ELECTRIC PARTS D W FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3103194 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 ]? COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r CLAIMS PAID 03109M POSTING DATE 03/09/94 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136232 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $2,027.25 CHEMICALS 136233 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $165.18 HARDWARE 136234 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $278.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 136235 KING BEARING,INC. $391.11 MACHINE SUPPLIES 136236 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1,328.45 TOOLS 135237 LAD SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $477.62 SAFETY SUPPLIES 136238 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L.LAVOIE $69.97 LEGAL SERVICES-NI ZEN 136239 LAYMAN,JONES 6 DYE,LAWYERS $20.00 LEGAL SERVICES-COOPER M.O.5-13-92 136240 ORANGE CNTY DIV.-CALIF LEAGUE OF CITIES $200.00 ASSESSMENT DUES n 136241 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $622.70 DEFERRED COMP TRUSTEE m 136242 SOHO-LYNCH CORP. $718.91 JANITORIAL SERVICES 136243 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $1,708.40 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6.10.92 n 138244 MACOMCO $505.94 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136245 MAG-TROL,INC. $1.037.48 INSTRUMENT PARTS �--� 138246 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $260.62 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 136247 MEMBREX 3662.63 LAB SUPPLIES 3 135248 MES COMPANY $1,212.20 MECHANICAL REPAIRS # 136249 METAL SUPPLY,INC. $1,368.53 METAL 00 136250 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $916.63 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.11.18-92 136251 MIDWAY MFG.S MACHINING $5,665.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 1 136252 MILLIPORE AND/OR WATERS $309.43 LAB SUPPLIES n 136253 MISCO $1,168.36 LAB SUPPLIES r 136254 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.319.28 UNIFORM RENTALS 136255 MOLECULAR RESEARCH CENTER $52.00 LAB SUPPLIES L7 136256 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $2.720.00 LAB SERVICES N 136267 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE $10.000.00 RATING AGENCY FEES,TCPP 136258 MORTON SALT $484.69 SALT 136259 MOTOROLA,INC. $766.42 INSTRUMENT PARTS f'1 136260 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $59.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 136261 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1.713.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIES N 136252 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $851.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136283 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $60.58 WATER USE 136264 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $480.52 SAFETY GLASSES 136265 OFFICE PAVILIONSSNTERIOR RESOURCES $3.272.33 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS 136266 THE OHMART CORP $7,491AS METER 136267 DX SYSTEMS CO. $20,322.48 CHLORINE M.O.11-1B-92 136268 OLYMPIC CREATIONS $1,574.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136269 ORANGE COUNTY FAIR&EXPO CTR $100.00 SPACE RENTAL 136270 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $471.30 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 136271 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. 5481.03 FITTINGS 136272 ORANGE OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY $120.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 136273 OWL SCIENTIFIC PLASTICS $504.94 LAB SUPPLIES 135274 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,522.75 SPECIALTY GASES 136275 PSY HEALTH SYSTEMS $854.00 MEDICAL SERVICES 136276 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $352.86 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136277 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT OO. $419.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES r FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/03194 PAGE 05 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY V1 CLAIMS PAID 03/09/94 POSTING DATE 03/09/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT a 136278 PACIFIC BELL $31.85 TELEPHONE SERVICES 136279 PAGENET $1,205.78 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 136280 PALMIERI.TYLER.WIENER, S207.29 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6.12-91 136281 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 136282 PARTS UNLIMITED $807.41 TRUCK PARTS 136283 KPMG PEAT MARWICK CPA $4,000.00 AUDIT SERVICES,TCPP 136284 PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS,INC. $36,024.82 CHEMICALS 136285 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $144.141.45 RESIDUALS REMOVAL MO 5.8-91 136286 POLYMETRICS,INC. $1,262.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136287 POLYPURE,INC. $25.029.46 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11.92 fTi 136288 POST,BUCKLEY,SCHUH 8 JERNIGAN $2.520.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-R1 2 138289 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $42.00 ICE n 136290 PRINCETON SEPARATIONS $368.75 LAB SUPPLIES 136291 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $12.246.50 FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES 136292 PULSAFEEDER $1,360.74 PUMP PARTS f l 136293 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $063.00 FENCING INSTALLATION 3 136294 RD SYSTEMS,INC. $5.538.74 SECURITY SYSTEMS 135295 RM CONTROLS $158.34 INSTRUMENT PARTS :th 136296 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $2,441.29 ELECTRIC PARTS 00 136297 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1,632.71 TRASH REMOVAL I 136298 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $2.448.12 LAB SUPPLIES D 136299 BOLT DELIVERY $28.35 FREIGHT r- 136300 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $1.360.00 OCEAN MONITORING r-- 136301 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1,320.51 PLUMBING SUPPLIES l7 136302 ROSEMOUNT,INC. S191.55 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136303 RYAN-NERCO $415.00 METER CAI 136304 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $229.18 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1 136305 DOUG SARVIS $750.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 135306 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $91,609.69 CONSTRUCTION 5-36 n 136307 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $302.436.29 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-9.93 N 138300 SEA COAST DESIGNS $171.91 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 136309 SELCO PRODUCTS CO. S523.37 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136310 SETHCO DIWMET PRO $306.78 PUMP PARTS 136311 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $164.06 CABLES 136312 SHASTA ELECTRIC $458.44 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 136313 SHURELUCK SALES $9.358.32 TOOLS/HARDWARE 136314 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1.163.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 136315 SMITH-EMERY CO. $7,762.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 136316 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $400.00 PERMIT FEES 136317 SOUTH COAST ENVIRONMENTAL CO. $4.585.00 EMISSIONS TESTING 136318 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $16,211.80 POWER 136319 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $18.908.68 NATURAL GAS 136320 SOUTH PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL $2.503.26 CHEMICALS 136321 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $6.100.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 136322 STANDARD 8 POORS CORP. $12,000.00 RATING AGENCY FEES,TCPP 136323 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS $463.40 BUILDING REPAIRS FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/03194 PAGE O6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY OT CLAIMS PAID 03/09/94 POSTING DATE 03819/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136324 STRATAGENE $1,298.39 LAB SUPPLIES 136325 GARY G.STREED $1,624.92 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 136326 SUPELCO,INC. $241.50 LAB SUPPLIES 136327 SUR-LITE CORPORATION $500.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 136328 TCH ASSOCIATES $2,736.00 LAB SUPPLIES 136329 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $164.31 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 138330 THOMAS FISH COMPANY $107.25 LAB SUPPLIES 135331 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $85.01 LOCKS&KEYS ➢ 136332 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO. $9.248.80 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.1.13.92 c� 136333 TRAINING CONSULTANTS INTER. $1.047.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION m 136334 TRANSMATION,INC. $193.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS z 136335 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $633.30 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES n 136335 TRIPPE MFG.CO. $500.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136337 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $297.28 TRUCK PARTS 136338 TRUCO,INC. $263.99 LAB SUPPLIES I l 135339 TRUESDAIL LABS $3,101.72 LAB SERVICES 3 136340 JO TUCKER&SON,INC. $980.29 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136341 TUSTIN DODGE $75.93 TRUCK PARTS W 136342 TUTTLE-CLICK CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH $20,025.92 TRUCK PARTS 736343 UNION FOODS $18.451.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 136344 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $463.61 PARCEL SERVICES ➢ 136345 UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII $11.510.50 NWRI FUND TRANSFER r 136345 VWR SCIENTIFIC $6.794.82 LAB SUPPLIES r 136347 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $4.816.43 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136348 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $736.89 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136349 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $841.30 FREIGHT 135350 VERNES PLUMBING $828.92 PLUMBING SERVICES 136351 VERTEX SYSTEMS $578.56 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT C-t 136352 VILLAGE NURSERIES $92.63 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES -1 136353 VOLLER,SAVAGE&ASSOC. $2.887.50 INSURANCE CONSULTANT N 136354 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $15,850.91 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8.12-92 136355 WESCO $1,435.85 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 135356 WHATMAN LAB SALES.INC. $432.55 LAB SUPPLIES 138357 JLWINGERTCO. $456.54 ELECTRIC PARTS 136358 WIRTH GAS EQUIPMENT CO. $9,100.90 ENGINE PARTS 136359 WTTEG $2,012.94 LAB SUPPLIES 136360 XEROX CORP. $11,038.13 COPIER LEASES 136351 XEROX $3,279.53 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 136362 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $660.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPUES 136363 NORMAN E.CULVER $11.76 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 03AWN $1,783.818.56 m FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3103194 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 n COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY V CLAIMS PAID 03109M POSTING DATE 03109194 SUMMARY AMOUNT 02 CAP FAC FUND 2,520.00 93 OPER FUND 0,206.61 #5 OPER FUND 222.27 05 CAP FAC FUND 91,809.69 97 OPER FUND 22,032.57 a 07 CAP FAC FUND 316.00 m #11 OPER FUND 786.36 P7 011 CAP FAC FUND 42,590.00 _ #14 CAP FAC FUND 207.29 D #586 OPER FUND 106.14 9586 CAP FAC FUND 177.936.50 #7814 OPER FUND 9,963.00 m JT OPER FUND 1.004.169.51 3 CORP 204.026.28 # SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 36,567.97 00 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 181,959.29 87,783,818.58 a r r v --I A_ n N 14 a FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3117194 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY tz CLAIMS PAID 3/23/91 POSTING DATE 3123/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 136364 AG TECH COMPANY 548.398.44 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 136385 AIHCE,REGISTRATION COORDINATION $805.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 136386 ATM AA,INC. $8.957.80 LAB SERVICES 136387 AT&T $2.958.48 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 136388 AT&T $222.D4 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 136389 ARRON BROTHERS ART MARTS $118.84 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136390 ACCESSORIE AIR COMPRESSOR $92.05 MECHANICAL PARTS 136391 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $788.73 LAB SUPPLIES 135392 AIR COLD SUPPLY.INC. $385.31 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS n 136393 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $314.267.50 CONSTRUCTION P2-53-1 m 136394 AMER.SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY $250.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION m 136395 AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTION $394.10 LAB SUPPLIES z 136396 AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO. $20,009.13 CONSTRUCTION P2-51 Co y 136398 ANALYSTS,INC. $1,235.00 ENGINE PARTS 136399 ANTHONY STEMSCONTROL .311.62 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136400 A-PLUS APPLIED BIO YS $2,110.74 LAB SUPPLIES f:TI 136401 APPLIEDBIOBYSIES INC. $$955.00 LAB SUPPLIES 3 136401 ABC LABORATORIES 5955.00 LAB SERVICES Ri 136402 ARENS INDUSTRIES,INC. $2,654.97 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES DO 136403 ARMOR-VAC $432.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 136404 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $564.40 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 136405 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE $1,75D.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 136406 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $145.46 BUILDING MATERIALS r 136407 ASSOC.ADMINIS.B CONSULTANTS $3.932.86 DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS 136408 ATKINIJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT tv 135409 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. $517.20 PUMP PARTS N 136410 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $4,585.42 PAYROLL SERVICES -4 136411 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $324.07 HARDWARE A 136412 BRW SAFETY&SUPPLY $1,233.74 SAFETY SUPPLIES 136413 BANANA BLUEPRINT $2,880.60 PRINTING M.O.10-10-90 —1 135414 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $328.21 BATTERIES N 136415 HAUER COMPRESSOR $173.49 COMPRESSOR PARTS 136410 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $17,070.63 LAB SUPPLIES 136417 BEAR COMMUNICATION,INC. $115.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 136418 DON C.BEATTIE P.E. $800.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 138419 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $8.744.10 LAB EQUIPMENT 136420 J&H BERGE,INC. $1,679.87 LAB SUPPUES 136421 A BIEDERMAN,INC. $47.19 INSTRUMENT PART 135422 BIO-RAD LABORATORIES $119.30 LAB SUPPLIES 136423 BLACK&VEATCH $3,55D.92 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-25.1 136424 BOERINGER MANNHEIM $595.68 LAB SUPPLIES 136425 SON-ARUES $197.75 TRUCK PARTS 136426 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $14,990.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18 136427 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY $205.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135428 C.P.I. $1.015.47 LAB SUPPLIES 136429 CS COMPANY $8,858.58 PLUMBING SUPPUES to FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/17/90 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 m COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 3r2 DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY I CLAIMS PAID 3123194 POSTING DATE 323194 N WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136430 1994 CWPCA CONF C/O NIVER $1,720.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 136431 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $7.000.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES M.0.1-12-94 136432 CAPITAL WESTWARD $174.34 REGULATORS 136433 CARLETON ENGINEERS $6,718.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 136434 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS $52,294.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33&J-34 136435 CHEM SYSTEMS $4,642.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 136436 FIBERGRATE/CHEMWEST $20,482.96 WELDING SUPPLIES 136437 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $443.42 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136438 LORETTA L.COFFMAN $64.00 PUBLICATION n 136439 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. E221.61 PUMP m m 136440 COUCH&SONS $13.102.00 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIR ZG 136441 COLLEGE PLACEMENT COUNCIL .710.00 SUBSCRIPTION n 136443 COMPUTER POWER.INC. $3,870.70 COMPUTER TPARTS 1364" COMPUSERVE E$311.83 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 136444 CONNELG P $319.64 COMPUTER SERVICES m 136445 CONSOL GM PARTS/DIY. $260.44 TRUCK PARTS 3 136446 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST E72,2fi0.41 ELECTRIC PARTS 136447 CONTINENTAL FREIGHTWAYS $351.39 FREIGHT CHARGES 00 136448 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS,INC. $2.415.58 TOOLS 136449 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $116.37 CHLORINE M.0.10-9.91 1 136450 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $10,513.26 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.7.17-91 n 136451 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $625.74 TRUCK PARTS r 136452 R.E.COULTER CRANE RENTAL $804.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL r 136453 CHARLES P.CROWLEY CO. $1,377.33 INSTRUMENT t 1 136454 DBH TRUCK EQUIPMENT $9,164.13 TRUCK PARTS 136455 DAILY PILOT $49.50 NOTICES&ADS co 136456 J.W.VANGELO CO.,INC. $693.59 FITTINGS 135457 DAPPER TIRE $827.99 TIRES '-� 136458 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $273.26 LAB SUPPLIES n 136459 CALIF.DEPT.OF FISH&GAME $662.00 PERMITFEE N 136460 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $13,998.88 VALVES 136461 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $4,710.64 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-11.93 136462 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $245.68 PRINTING 136463 DIONEX CORP. $1,373.11 LAB SUPPLIES 136464 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $4,576.27 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL M.0.1-13-92 136465 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $2,245.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE&REPAIRS 136456 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $633.45 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 136467 ARNI DUNN,MFCC $1,130.00 EMERGENCY CONSULTING SERVICES 136468 ESP NORTH $542.60 LAB SUPPLIES 136469 EASTMAN,INC. $3,850.48 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136470 EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SPEC. $7,000.00 "THINK EARTH"CONTRIBUTION M.0.5-13-92 136471 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $6.646.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 136472 ENCHANTER,INC. $5,600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10.92 136473 ED ENGLAND INSTRUMENTS $710.32 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 136474 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $359.60 LAB SERVICES 136475 F&M WELDING $533.36 WELDING SERVICES w N FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/17/94 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �i CLAIMS PAID 3/23/94 POSTING DATE 323194 W WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136476 FMC CORP. $320.00 LAB SUPPLIES 136477 MARSHAL FARRIES $78.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 136478 FAVORITE FOODS $23156.91 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 136479 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $451.40 AIR FREIGHT 136480 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $333.50 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 136481 FISHER HAMILTON SCIENTIFIC $215.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136482 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $67.12 LAB SUPPLIES 136483 FOOTHILL PROJECT MANAGEMENT $669.00 RESIDENT NOTIFICATION SERVICES 136484 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS,INC. $475.33 HARDWARE y 136485 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $160.79 PHOTO SUPPLIES G-1 136486 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1,129.33 PAINT SUPPLIES m 136487 GST,INC. $2.345.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES z 136488 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $329.86 LUMBERIHARDWARE C7 136490 GATES FIBERGLASS ERGCALLASSNSTALLSCOMPANY $2.101.13 CHEMICALS 136490 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $2,107.13 LAB SERVICES -� 136491 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $1,554.49 ELECTRIC PARTS m 136492 GE COMPUTER SERVICE $711.14 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 3 136493 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4.178.93 TELEPHONE SERVICES 3t 136494 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $5,17 m MECHANICAL PARTS 00 136495 N GLANTZ&SON $136.79 BUILDING MATERIALS I 136496 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES,INC. $211.00 PUBLICATIONS 136497 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $1,754.55 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 136498 GRASSY S.T.I. $2,769.76 ENGINE PARTS r 136499 DGA CONSULTANTS $3,770.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 r 13650 HB TYPE B $84.05 PRINTING b 136501 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. g150.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION N 136502 HACH COMPANY $43.16 LAB SUPPLIES -1 136503 FREDA.HARPER $1,500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 136504 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $821.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES n 136505 MATCH&KIRK,INC. $2,686.18 TRUCK PARTS -1 136506 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1,650.00 CONTAINER RENTALS N 136507 PL HAWN CO,INC. $9.326.72 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 136508 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 136509 HEWLETTPACKARD $363.66 LAB SUPPLIES 136510 HILTI,INC. $1,781.25 TOOLS 136511 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $51.937.70 ENGINEERING SERVICES P144 136512 HOME DEPOT $201.98 HARDWARE 136513 HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES $49.51 BUILDING MATERIALS 136514 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $135.77 PAINT SUPPLIES 136515 IDEXX $1.161.21 LAB SUPPLIES 136516 IMAGING PLUS $275.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 136517 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $57.10.18 FERRIC CHLORIDE MOO 1.18-92 136618 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 3708.01 CONNECTORS 136519 INORGANIC VENTURES $221.14 LAB SUPPLIES 135520 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH $218.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136521 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1.260.73 BATTERIES W W FUND NO 91W - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3117194 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 OIU COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r CLAIMS PAID 3123/94 POSTING DATE 3123/94 z WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136522 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $33.44 WATER USE 136523 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1.511.54 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 136524 JAVID CONTRACTORS,INC. $249.124.35 CONSTRUCTION P2-235-1 136525 JETFORM CORP. $114J7 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 136526 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $50.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 136527 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $2,116.21 ELECTRIC PARTS 136528 JOHNSTONE PUMP CO. 522,508.14 PUMP 136529 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $23.32 HARDWARE 136530 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY $3,239.91 MACHINE SUPPLIES n 136531 KARS'ADVANCED MATERIALS,INC. $1,990.00 ENGINE TESTING m 136532 KELLY PAPER $75.D4 PRINTING z 1365M KELLYSERVICES BROS, $270.19 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES O 136535 KING BEARING, ING,INC.INC. $492.73 MACHINE PLUMBING PARTI n 136535 KING BEARING,I $d92.73 MACHINE SUPPLIES ,:i 136536 KNO%INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 52,863.68 TOOLS 736637 KURZ INSTRUMENTS,INC. $235.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 3 13653B L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $596.88 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES # 136539 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $79.20 PUMP PARTS 136540 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $120.27 CHEMICALS Go 136641 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $168.39 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1 136542 LEGI-TECH $320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES y 136543 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGR. $67.055.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5 T— 136544 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO. $364.07 TRUCK PARTS r 136545 CRC PRESS,INC. $349.80 LAB SUPPLIES ty 136546 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $20,036.97 DEFERRED COMP TRANSFER 136547 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $12,91L54 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIR.M.O.10.7U-90 136548 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF LA. $37.265.00 TEST/ANALYSIS-JEIP M.O.2-19-92 136549 MPS $51.84 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 136550 MACOMCO $38.18 SERVICE AGREEMENT cl 136551 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $2.447.81 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES N 136552 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $569.703.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 136553 MATRIX ELECTRONICS $56.04 INSTRUMENTENGINEERING SERVICES ES 136554 MATRIX SERVICE.INC. $33,212.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.71-10.93 136555 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $239.83 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 136555 METAL SUPPLY,INC. $1.995.10 METAL 136557 MILLIPORE AND/OR WATERS $316.29 LAB SUPPLIES 136558 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $214.01 LAB SUPPLIES 136559 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.850.16 UNIFORM RENTALS IM550 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $60.06 PUMP PARTS 136561 NASCO WEST,INC. $303.59 LAB SUPPLIES 136562 NATIONAL RESEARCH COUN:CANADA $655.45 PUBLICATIONS 136563 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 136564 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $642.44 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136565 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $144.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136566 ORACLE CORPORATION $1.750.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 136567 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $69.93 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/17194 PAGE 05 REPORT NUMBER AP43 w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 323/94 POSTING DATE 3123/94 Vl WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136568 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE 568.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 136569 ORANGE COURIER $200.48 COURIER SERVICES 136570 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $797.99 FITTINGS 135571 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $11.346.18 REIMBURSE WORKERS'COMP INSURANCE 135572 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $709.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES 136573 PACIFIC BELL $13B.65 TELEPHONE SERVICES 135574 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $188.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 136575 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $542.12 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 136576 PAINE WEBBER $28,853.44 REMARKETING SERVICES M.0.10-14-92 136677 PAK WEST $70.69 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES f1l 135578 PARTS UNLIMITED $1.143.09 TRUCK PARTS Z 136579 PASCAL&LUDWIG,INC. $332,919.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-38-2 1355W PASCAL&LUDWIG $151,250.00 CONSTRUCTION P243-1 136581 PATTEN CORP[TAYLOR INSTR. $226.42 OPERATING SUPPLIES 136M PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $794.21 LAB SUPPLIES f 136M PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS,INC. $12,232.32 CHEMICALS 3 135W PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $146,057.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.SA-91 136595 PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP. $183.18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE rM W 136M POLY ENTERPRISES,INC. $649.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135567 POLYPURE,INC. $17,398.75 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3.11-92 1 130M POSTMASTER $405.00 P.O.BOX RENTAL D 136M POWER PUMPS,INC. $5,282.44 PUMP PARTS r 136590 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $84.D0 ICE T- 136591 MIKE PRLICH&SONS $630.00 CONSTRUCTION 5.35-2 L7 136592 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY $4,143.42 PUMP PARTS 136M PULSAFEEDER $125.44 PUMP PARTS Tn 136594 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $412.00 PUMP PARTS --1 136595 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $83.72 BUILDING MATERIALS A 136596 QUEST MEDIA&SUPPLIES $4,405.98 OFFICE FURNITURE C-1 136597 RD SYSTEMS,INC. $1.283.14 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 136598 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. $17,926.40 CMMS DATABASE DESIGN M.0.8-12-92 136599 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $91.59 LAB SUPPLIES 136600 RED WING SHOES $370.66 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 136601 BOLT DELIVERY $63.79 FREIGHT 136602 THE REGISTER $213AD NOTICES&ADS 136603 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $1,520.00 OCEAN MONITORING 136604 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $7,793.V PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136605 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT.CORP. $165.25 LAB SUPPLIES 136606 RICOH ELECTRONICS,INC. $3,000.00 ECSA DEPOSIT REFUND 136607 ROSEMOUNT.INC. $668.16 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 136608 BANDON ENGINEERING,INC. $600.00 PAINT SUPPLIES 136609 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1.329.37 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136610 SARTEDT $307.86 LAB SUPPLIES 136611 DOUG SARVIS $1,125.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 136612 SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS $6,718.60 LAB SUPPLIES 136613 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $765.03 SPECIALTY GASES Lb FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3117194 PAGE O6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 w COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 3I23194 POSTING DATE 323194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136614 SECURITY SPECIALISTS $160.00 SECURITY COMPUTER PARTS 136615 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,294.76 TOOLS 136616 SHASTA ELECTRIC $9.650.00 ELECTRICIAN SERVICES 136617 SHELL WESTERN E&P,INC. $51,804.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 136618 MARC SHIPMAN $2.125.00 GROUNDSKEEPING 136619 SHURELUCK SALES $14.306.44 TOOLSIHARDWARE 136620 SKALAR,INC. $2,480.39 LAB SUPPLIES 136621 SMITH-EMERY CO. $290.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.747-91 136622 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $3,024.00 PERMIT FEES n 136623 SOUTH COAST ENVIRONMENTAL CO. $42.456.25 EMISSIONS TESTING M.O.7-14-93 rn 136624 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $57.717.31 POWER m 136625 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $83,891.35 NATURAL GAS n 136626 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $42.67 WATER USE 136627 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $712.07 DIESEWNLEADED FUEL 136628 SOUVENIR PHOTO $14.27 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES m 136629 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $1,894.01 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 3 136630 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. 55,800.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 # 136631 SPEX INDUSTRIES.INC. $528.00 LABSUPPLIES OD 136532 GARY G.STREED $5,439.79 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 136633 STROMBOTINE PRINTING $1,155.08 PRINTING 136634 SUN ELECTRIC CORP. $77.67 TRUCK PARTS n 136635 SUNSET FORD $166.39 TRUCK PARTS T- 136636 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $88.01 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES T- 136637 TCH ASSOCIATES $125.00 LAB SUPPLIES ry 136638 TARGET $68.59 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES i--i 136639 TAYL0R-0UNN MFG.COMPANY $908.55 ELECTRIC CART PARTS Tn 136640 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $516.03 MECHANICAL PARTS 136641 3T EQUIPMENT COMPANY $307.56 CABLE 136642 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $210.88 LOCKS&KEYS f" 136643 TRANE $595.41 VALVES N4 136644 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $2,720.50 TRAVEL SERVICES 136645 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $1,358.66 TRUCK PARTS 136646 CITY OF TUSTIN $185.03 WATER USE 136647 TWINING LABORATORIES $4.994.02 LAB SERVICES 136648 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $546.80 TRUCK PARTS 136649 USL INC. $269.32 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 136650 UHLER.INC. $171.015.30 CONSTRUCTION 532&533 136651 UNITED CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY $3,000.00 ECSA DEPOSIT REFUND 136652 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $228d1 PARCEL SERVICES 136653 UNITED SCIENTIFIC PROD. $262.56 LAB SUPPLIES 1366M UNITED STATES BIOCHEMICAL 180.37 LAB SUPPLIES 136655 UNIVERSAL FLOORING SYSTEMS 4,547.00 CARPET 136656 VWR SCIENTIFIC 2.790.25 LAB SUPPLIES 136657 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. 1.647.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136658 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 1.512.17 FREIGHT 136659 VERTEX SYSTEMS 4.632.06 COMPUTER SUPPORT CO FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/17/94 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 3/23194 POSTING DATE 3/23194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136660 VILLAGE NURSERIES $732.70 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 136661 VOSSLER&COMPANY 3786.38 VALVES 136662 ASS DRIVES $7.812.43 PUMP PARTS 136663 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $15.755.03 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 136664 WHATMAN LAB SALES,INC. $35.00 LAB SUPPLIES 136665 WITEG 5285.54 LAB SUPPLIES 136666 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $56.408.20 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 136667 GEORGE YARDLEY CO, $1,702.77 LAB SUPPLIES 136668 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $73.70 LAB SUPPLIES 136669 EVERETT H.YORK CO. $997.33 ENGINE PARTS m 136670 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION m 136671 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $160.00 ANNEXATION FEE n 136672 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMM. $500.00 ANNEXATION FEE 136673 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMM. 55,000.00 ANNEXATION FEE 136674 CSOOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL $100,000.00 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE RUN-OUT m $3.3ST 5 3 00 SUMMARY AMOUNT I #1 OPER FUND $5,194.41 p2 OPER FUND 11.351.67 03 OPER FUND 33,718.15 L7 #3 CAP FAC FUND 13.102.00 N 05 OPER FUND 2,588.69 -� 05 CAP FAC FUND 1@5.304.30 .� #6 OPER FUND 278.03 06 CAP FAC FUND 37.78 #7 OPER FUND 10,059.78 y 97 CAP FAC FUND 17,908.49 Al OPER FUND 7,370.36 #11 CAP FAC FUND 2,879.70 $14 OPER FUND 687.88 014 CAP FAC FUND 188.39 05&6 OPER FUND 1,3D5.29 #5&6 CAP FAC FUND 14.016.66 #6&7 OPER FUND 2,302.89 #7&14 OPER FUND 6,319.69 JT OPER FUND 647.458.36 CARP 2,019,293.41 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 128,095.51 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 275.201.39 $ 3364,859.43 W RESOLUTION NO. 94-36 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF . 12 .5% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION. SPECIFICATION NO. C-033 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF 12.5% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION, SPECIFICATION NO. C-033 x xxxxxxxxtxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of contract be made to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation for Purchase of 12.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Specification No. C-033, and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposal submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That a Purchase Contract for Specification No. C-033 be awarded to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation for the price of $.3742 per gallon, plus sales tax, furnished and delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor, for a one-year period beginning May 14, 1994, with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms; and, Section 3 . That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, "C-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS 11C-1" 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 , are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign said Purchase Contract with said supplier to supply 12.5% sodium hypochlorite solution pursuant to the specifications and purchase contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said material are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 13, 1994 . re6.036 ^C-Z^ AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-Z° March 22, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS MEMORANDUM of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1II AA ELLIS AVENUE PO BOXS127 TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager E«+ AIWVALLE..cAUf0weAS27MS127 ntAis52.2.11 FROM: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF 12.5% SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION SPECIFICATION NO. C-033 Sealed bids were opened March 22, 1994, for the purchase and delivery of 12.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Solution for a one-year period beginning May 14, 1994. Tabulation of bids is as follows: PRICE ESTIMATED COMPANY PER GALLON ANNUAL COST Western States Chemical Supply $.3742 $248,843.00 Orange. CA GPS Industries $.3800 $252,700.00 City of Industry, CA All Pure Chemical $.4125 $274,312.50 Santa Fe Springs, CA Jones Chemicals, Inc. $.4750 $315,875.00 Torrance, CA Commerce Chemical Company NO-BID City of Industry, CA It is recommended the award be made to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation,t he lowest responsible bidder, for a one-year contract period beginning May 14, 1994. The total estimated annual cost of$248,843.00, plus applicable sales tax, is based on 665,000 gallon usage at a unit price of$.3742 per dry gallon delivered. Provisions are in the specifications for four consecutive one-year contract extension periods. Katherine Yarosh Senior Buyer We hereb bncor w the foregoing recommendation: Ted Ho an, Pu asing Mana r ary G. Stiped. Robert J. Ooten Director of Finance Assistant Director of Operations "C-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 101144 ELLIS AVENUE ' 00 80A a+n March 23, 1994 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAMFOANIA 92728-8127 n14I960-2411 M E M O R A N D U M TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager FROM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF THREE 3/4 TON STANDARD SIZE PICKUP TRUCKS SPECIFICATION NO. V-002 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, March 15, 1994, for the Purchase of Three 3/4 Standard Size Pickup Trucks. Tabulation of bids Is as follows: DEALER UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE Fuller Ford $13,632.00 $40,896.00 Chula Vista, CA • Golden State Ford Truck Sales $14,767.00 $44,301.00 Los Angeles, CA • Connell Chevrolet $16,265.00 $48,795.00 Costa Mesa, CA Theodore Robins Ford $16,905.00 $50,715.00 Costa Mesa, CA It Is recommended the award be made to Fuller Ford, the lowest responsible bidder, for their proposed amount of$40,896.00,plus sales tax. Sufficient funds have been budgeted for this purchase. Respectfully p6'1 1 ed, '•mac:. .w� Ted Hoffman Purchasing Manager W ereby conc r with the above recommendation: a r ry G. Strftpd Edwin E. Hodges Director o inane Assistant Director of Maintenance "D" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS I'D" Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Soffa Electric, Inc. C.O. No.: Two 121 Date: Anril 13. 1994 Job: Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28 IRebidl Amount of this Change Order $ 0.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION DELAY The Contractor was directed to delay the installation of contract-supplied equipment due to conflicts with existing construction projects. The equipment supplied under this project was specified to be installed in newly constructed cabinetry and consoles within the new Control Center. The referenced furniture was to be provided under a separate project. At the time the contract equipment was ready for installation, the furniture work was not completed. This item also includes delay time associated with the relocation of Districts' personnel and other existing computer equipment from the old to the new Control Centers. This item was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 90 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $0.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 90 Calendar Days "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Soffa Electric: Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: April 13, 1994 Job: Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28 (Rebid) The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 90 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: March 11, 1993 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: September 6, 1993 Time Extension this C.O.: 90 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 120 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 300 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: January 4, 1994 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: January 4, 1994 Original Contract Price $ 312,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ (605,00) This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 0.00 Amended Contract Price $ 311,395.00 "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Soffa Electric. Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: Aoril 13. 1994 Job: Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System. Job No. J-28 IRebidl Board Authorization Date: April 13, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted b Recommended by: ngineering Manager Date Co strruction Manager Date Appro d y. Approv as o Form: Dire or of Engineering D to Gen al Counsel Date Accepted by: SOFFA ELECTRIC, INC. 0 n c�p� • �*ate Contractor �l "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" RESOLUTION NO. 94-37 ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-28 (REBID) AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PUMP STATION TELEMETRY AND MONITORING SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-28 (REBID) , AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Soffa Electric, Inc. , has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28 (Rebid) , on January 4, 1994; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28 (Rebid) , is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated March 11, 1993; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefore; and, "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Soffa Electric, Inc. , setting forth the terms and conditions for . acceptance of Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28 (Rebid) , is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 13, 1994. eay.w7 7-2- AGENDA ITEM #9(d) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" Page 1 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One (1) Date: April13. 1994 Job: Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-32 Consultant: Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduct) $ (4,401.001 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - DELETION OF AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL This item deletes the specified 3-inch thick surface layer of aggregate base material from around the perimeter of the concrete slabs for the Final Effluent Sampler and the Bioassay Research Trailers. Another construction project is underway immediately adjacent to this site and the aggregate would be disturbed during its construction. It was determined at this time that it would be in the Districts' best interest to delete this item of work. This item was negotiated with the contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions (Reference Plan Change No. 1; P & L letter dated July 28, 1993). CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S(2,906.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - TIME EXTENSION FOR SUBMITTAL REVIEWS This item involves the addition of 61 calendar days to the contract for needed time associated with review of submittals for components and equipment. The original contract did not allow enough time to review the submittals, fabricate, deliver and install the specified components and equipment. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-61b)1 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 61 Calendar Days "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" Page 2 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One 11) Date: April13. 1994 Job: Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-32 Consultant: Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers ITEM 3 - MODIFICATIONS TO SAMPLER BUILDING ROOF This item is for labor and materials required to remove and replace a portion of the existing Sampler Building roof as required to install an air compressor. The existing door openings were too small to allow passage of the contract-specified air compressors. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions (Reference: FCO No. 1). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,228.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days ITEM 4 - MODIFICATIONS TO TRAILER TIE DOWNS This item is for providing 60 jaw ends for the turnbuckles of the trailer tie downs. District staff decided that the specified fastening system was not adequate for a proper seismic connection. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b) 2 of the General Provisions (Reference: P&L RFI No. 11; FCO No. 2). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,932.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 6 Calendar Days "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" Page 3 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwio Engineers C.O. No.: One (1) Date: April 13, 1994 Job: Final Effluent Samoler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-32 Consultant: Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers ITEM 5 - ELECTRICAL POWER FOR WATER HEATERS This item is for modifications to the size of conduits, conductors, breakers, and panels to provide electrical power for the two new water heaters located in the sampler trailer and bioassay trailer. The requirements to increase the conductor and breaker sizes and a new subpanel were necessary to conform with the National Electrical Code. The existing panels shown for connection were already filled and did not have adequate space for the required terminations. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions (Reference: P&L RFI #14; FCO #4). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,684.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 4 Calendar Days ITEM 6 - RELOCATION OF AIR COMPRESSOR CONTROL PANEL This item is for the labor and material required to disconnect the air compressor control panel, remove and relocate to the west interior wall of the sampler building. The existing sample pump and piping are located within the clear work space zone in front of the control panel. In an attempt to expedite the project it was decided not to remove the pumps and piping because the Districts' NPDES permit requires U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) approval prior to the moving of sampling locations. It is necessary to relocate the control panel in order to comply with the National Electric Code. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions (Reference: FCO #5). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $427.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" Page 4 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One (1) Date: Aoril 13, 1994 Job: Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-32 Consultant: Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers ITEM 7 - INSTALLATION OF A NEW FAUCET IN BIOASSAY RESEARCH TRAILER This item is for providing a new sink faucet and piping repairs in the Bioassay Research Trailer. The existing faucet was not serviceable as it leaked and has cracks at the connection points. This additional work was not shown on the Contract Drawings. This item was accomplished by Contractor's Force Account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions (Reference: P&L RFI #12; FCO #3). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $234.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8 - LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The contract documents provide for liguidated damages of $500.00 per day for delays to the contract completion per Specification Section 50-8. With all of the time extensions given on this project (including this change order), the revised contract time will be 120 calendar days or a date of November 17, 1993. The actual operational completion date was December 8, 1993. Therefore, the Contractor is assessed 20 days of liquidated damages at $500.00 per day for a total of $10,000.00 CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S(101000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: S(4,401.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 75 Calendar Days "G-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-4" Page 5 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One 11l Date: April13. 1994 Job: Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-32 Consultant: Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers The additional work contained in this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 75 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order. District and Contractor agree that this extra work impacts the critical path scheduling of the prime work, resulting in an overall extension of time for completion of the prime work. District and Contractor agree that the added cost described in Item 8 above constitutes full and equitable consideration for all the impacts incurred by the Contractor, and no other direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: July 21, 1993 Original Contract Time: 45 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: September 3, 1993 Time Extension this C.O.: 75 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 75 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 120 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: November 17, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 20 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: December 7, 1993 Original Contract Price $ 202,579,00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) S (4,401.001 Amended Contract Price $ 198,178.00 "G-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-5" Page 6 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Enaineers C.O. No.: One (1) Date: Aoril 13, 1994 Job: Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-32 Consultant: Lee & Ro Consultina Enaineers Board Authorization Date: April 13, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Recommended by:,, ngineering Manager Date Construction Manager Date Ap v y: Approv as to Form: Director of Engineering Date Gene a Counsel bate Accepted by: PASCAL AND LUDWIG ENGINEERS 4.hL 9¢ on actor Date "G-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-6" RESOLUTION NO. 94-38 ACCEPTING JOB NO. J-32 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING FINAL EFFLUENT SAMPLER SYSTEM AND BIOASSAY RESEARCH FACILITY AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-32, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT ++�#**f••�tif tiffs*:�•�t�•#*it,tif• The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: section 1. That the contractor, Pascal S Ludwig Engineers, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-32, on December 7, 1993; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-32, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated July 21, 1993; and, "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefore; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-32, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 13, 1994. sC3N.038 "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 . FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors. C.O. No.: One (1) Div. of Zurn Constructors. Inc. Date: April 13. 1994 Job: Electrification of Pumo Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. P7-36-1: Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Imorovements to Facilities at Plant No 1 Job No P1-38-1• Miscellaneous Imorovements to Facilities at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-4 and J-17-2: and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-3. Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduct) S(9.500.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from. the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - DELETE CONTRACTOR'S "ALL RISK" INSURANCE REQUIREMENT: In the bid Schedule of Prices, Item A, the cost of this insurance is called out separately with the option of deleting the insurance. The Districts have determined that it is in their best interest to delete the Builder's "All Risk" Insurance. "All Risk" Insurance for this project is automatically provided under the Districts' current insurance program. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S(91500.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: S(9,500.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors C.O. No.: One (1 ) Div. of Zurn Constructors. Inc. Date: April 13 1994 Job: Electrification of Pump Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 1 . Job No. P1-36-1 Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Imorovements to Facilities at Plant No. 1 , Job No. P1-38-1: Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1 Job No. P1-38-4 and J-17-2: and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-3. Consultant: John Carollo Enaineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. . SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: January 6, 1994 Original Contract Time: 300 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: November 1, 1994 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 6,059,364.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (9,500 001 Amended Contract Price $ 6,049,864.00 "I 2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2- Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Advanco Constructors. C.O. No.: One (1) Div. of Zurn Constructors. Inc. Date: April 13. 1994 Job: Electrification of Pump Drives at Reclamation Plant No 1 Job No P1-36-1 Security and Landscapina Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-1: Miscellaneous Imorovements to Facilities at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-38-4 and J-17-2: and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-3, Consultant: John Carollo Enaineers Board Authorization Date: April 13, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted b Rec mmended by: ? 8 9 2/ D- - 8 M<. 99- gineering Manager Date C nstruction Manager Date Appr a Ap oved as to F�m: oes f f f»rti 'god a i/yam Director of Engineering Date General Co nsel Date Accepted by: ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIV. OF ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC. Contr c or Date " I 3" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-3" Page 1 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Amelco Construction C.O. No.: Two 12) Date: April 13, 1994 Job: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-1 Consultant: Dames and Moore Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduei1 $33,436.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - ASBESTOS REMOVAL AT HEADWORKS B AND C This item is for removing existing roofing materials and equipment support pitch pans found to contain asbestos materials. Asbestos material removal shall be in accordance with all state and federal laws regarding handling, removal, and disposal of asbestos materials. The work includes removal of existing roofing and pitch pockets containing asbestos in Headworks B roofing, Headworks C roofing above the bar screen area, and equipment support pitch pockets and supports above the Engine Room in Headworks C. This item includes credit for removal of the roofing in these areas as shown on the contract documents. The existence of the asbestos materials was not disclosed in the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P2531-003,008,010) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $27,123.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-11 Page 2 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Amelco Construction C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: April 13, 1994 Job: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-1 Consultant: Dames and Moore ITEM 2 - TEMPORARY AIR SUPPLY FANS This item is for removing two existing air supply fans in Headworks C to allow construction of new retrofitted columns which conflict with the fans. The work for this item includes removing the two fans, installing temporary fans, and reinstalling the permanent fans after the column construction is complete. All necessary duct modifications and electrical work is also included. The existing fans were recently installed by the Districts and not shown in the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P2531-001) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,551.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3 - DEMOLITION OF EXISTING AIR RECEIVER This item is for demolition and removal of an existing air receiver tank in Headworks B in lieu of relocation. The tank is no longer in service, and field survey determined that there was insufficient room to relocate the tank as shown on the plans. Credit for relocation of the tank in accordance with the contract documents is included in this item. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P2531-002) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,064.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-2" Page 3 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Amelco Construction C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: April 13, 1994 Job: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1 Consultant: Dames and Moore ITEM 4 - STAIR MODIFICATIONS This item is for removing the existing stairs located on the east side of the Headworks C grit chambers, modifying the stairs to suit new construction, and reinstalling the stairs. The stairs were installed under a separate contract after this contract's bids were received. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO P2531- 006) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,698.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $33,436.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Day "J-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-3" Page 4 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Amelco Construction C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: April 13, 1994 Job: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-1 Consultant: Dames and Moore The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: November 30, 1993 Original Contract Time: 180 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: May 28, 1994 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 0 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $1 ,377,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ (30,000.00) This Change (Add) (DeduetI $ 33,436.00 Amended Contract Price $1 ,380,436.00 "J-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-4" Page 5 of 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Amelco Construction C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: April 13, 1994 Job: Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-1 Consultant: Dames and Moore Board Authorization Date: April 13, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: _Rec mended by: a7/ 3 3 ,( f-�� 3- 3- 9¢ gineering Manager Date Construction Manager Date Appr by: // A ro d s to Form: 77ai»+ss% 1 v .713 Director of Engineering ate Ge ral Counsel ate Accepted by: AMELCO CONSTRUCTION Cant ctor Date "J-5- AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-5" RESOLUTION NO. 94-41-7 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO ADJUST MANHOLE COVERS ON DISTRICT SEWERS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO ADJUST MANHOLE COVERS ON DISTRICT SEWERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE COUNTY'S 1993-94 STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM IN UNINCORPORATED COUNTY AREAS WITHIN DISTRICT NO. 7 .................................. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California: DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated April 13, 1994, by and between County Sanitation District No. 7 and the County of Orange, providing for the adjustment of manhole covers on District sewers by the County in conjunction with their 1993-94 street resurfacing program in unincorporated County areas within District No. 7, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for the actual cost of adjusting the manhole covers, plus 10% for inspection and administration costs, not to exceed $220.00, nor be less than $155.00, per manhole for approximately 84 manholes, is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions of said Agreement; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 13, 1994. re939.041 "K" AGENDA ITEM #9( J ) - DISTRICT 7 "K" PETITION FOR ANNEXATION Date: TO: Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 I (%s) , the undersigned landowner(s), do hereby request that proceedings be taken to annex acres (Gross - to nearest hundredth) of territory to the District located in the vicinity of (Indicate adjacent street intersection or area description) , in the city of ORANGE , more particularly (Indicate city or unincorporated territory) described and shown on the LHGAL DESCRIPTION and MAP enclosed herewith which has been prepared in accordance with the District's annexation procedures. The street address of the property is: A The reason for the proposed annexation is: 70,A .SE[= ]CC l2t.�%r7EK/7;�L /)E�cLc;PKEn/ T Said property is Inhabited /_Uninhabited. Number of registered voters, if any: The assessed value of the property is: $ Also enclosed are the JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL QUESTIONNAIRE required by the Local Agency Formation Camlission (and an Environmental. Fact Report, if appropriate) and a check in the amount of $500.00 representing payment of the DISTRICT PROCESSING FEE. Notices and ocnlmnicationa relative to this proposal for annexation should be sent to the following: HoPST S JAY Pk IT7 8A PPAPeWC-S(1NC. 74,& N. LEMON ST. 55 . 5t. M(eaeq ANAHE( . 92 b ES Z6 Tale: 1't A— 767 Tale: 1%) 433- 61 SIGNIMM OF LANDOWNER DATE SIGNED ADDRESS OF LANDOWNER x 2, J�A POeQrICS, RC, 5g!h �(Lvul:J '�- Ati ( Ii La �hut ft U P Name or printed) 99-S NNION BLVD, Sf: 82 MCed851 x T IA,y Pill 7/ Cowl M Er.4, ck. g2-62E Name (lyped or printed) "L" AGENDA ITEM #9(K) - DISTRICT 7 "L" RESOLUTION NO. 94-42-7 AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND FILING OF APPLICATION TO LAFCO RE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO DISTRICT NO. 7 (ANNEXATION NO. 148 - CRAWFORD HILLS ANNEXATION) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION TO THE DISTRICT OF TERRITORY KNOWN AS ANNEXATION NO. 148 - CRAWFORD HILLS ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That proceedings are hereby authorized to be initiated by District No. 7, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County is hereby requested to take proceedings for the annexation of territory designated as "Annexation No. 148 - Crawford Hills Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7", the boundaries of which are more particularly described and delineated on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution, according to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in this resolution in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985; and, Section 2. That this proposal is made pursuant to the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code; and, "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) - DISTRICT 7 "M-1" Section 3. That this application is for the purpose of annexing approximately 128 .734 acres of territory to District No. 7 in the vicinity northeast of the intersection of Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road in the City of Orange, to provide sanitary sewer service to said territory, which said service is not now provided by any public agency, as requested by BA Properties, Inc. , owners of said property; and, Section 4. That the territory to be annexed is uninhabited; and, Section 5. That this proposal is consistent with the adopted sphere of influence of the affected District; and, Section 6. That the proposed Annexation No. 148 shall be subject to the condition that all fees required to be paid to the District must be satisfied prior to completion of the annexation proceedings; and, Section 7. That the District hereby agrees, pursuant to Section 99.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to waive its ad valorem property tax allocation exchange with other affected taxing agencies. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 13, 1994. x�,vtoa "M-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) - DISTRICT 7 "M-2" RESOLUTION NO. 94- CONFIRMING FEES, PROCEDURES AND POLICIES CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT AS ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 91- FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, CONFIRMING THAT ACREAGE ANNEXATION FEES HERETOFORE ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION NO. 91- FOR FISCAL YEARS 1991-92, 1992-93 AND 1993-94 SHALL REMAIN IN EFFECT THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1994-95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 91-_-_, the Board of Directors made certain findings and established a schedule of annexation acreage fees to be paid by the owners of all properties seeking to annex property to the District; and, WHEREAS, Resolution No. 91-__ provides that beginning July 1, 1991 and annually thereafter the annexation acreage fees are to be adjusted to reflect the increase in the Engineering News Record (ENR) construction cost index; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors adopted Resolution No. 937_-_, confirming said annexation acreage fees for fiscal year 1993-94; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has determined that it is able to maintain the currently established annexation acreage fees without increase for the forthcoming fiscal year 1994-95 without impairing the financial status of the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. _ of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(b)(2)(b) - DISTRICTS 2,3,5,7&11 "N-1" Section 1. That the annexation acreage fees heretofore established by Resolution No. 91 effective July 1, 1991 through June 30, 1992 and confirmed said fees by Resolution No. 92 _ effective July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1993 and confirmed said fees by Resolution No. 93 effective July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994, shall remain in effect for the period commencing July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995. section 2. All other provisions of Resolution No. 91-_- shall remain in effect without amendment or modification. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 13, 1994. RAN15 "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(b)(2)(b) - DISTRICTS 2,3,5,7&11 "N-2" RESOLUTION NO. 94-39 APPROVING AMENDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR THE OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE DISTRICTS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NOS. 79-176, 81-166 AND 83-188 + + + + x x x x + x x + x + + x + + x WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 81-66 adopted by the Boards of Directors on October 14, 1981, the Districts approved and adopted a revised Deferred Compensation Plan (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan") , and, by Resolution No. 83-188 adopted by the Boards of Directors on December 14, 1983, the Districts approved and adopted an amendment to the Plan; and, WHEREAS, certain changes in the federal law and regulations pertaining to deferred compensation plans adopted and administered by public agencies have been enacted subsequent to the adoption and amendment of the Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors desire to again amend the Plan to comply with such new federal law and regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: 110-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(C) - ALL DISTRICTS 110-1" Section 1. That the County sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 (as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as though set forth herein at length) , is hereby adopted and shall remain in effect until amended or terminated by resolution of the Boards of Directors. section 2. That Resolution Nos. 79-176, 81-166 and 83-188 are hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 13, 1994. MW.M 110-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN AS AMENDED 1994 SECTION 1 : Background. By Resolution No. 81-166 adopted by the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, on October 14, 1981, the Districts approved and adopted a revised deferred compensation plan. Due to changes in the law applicable to deferred compensation plans of local public agency employers, the Districts did, by Resolutions Nos. 83-188 and 94-_, adopted by the Boards of Directors on December 14, 1983 and 1994, respectively, approve and adopt amendments to the deferred compensation plan. This document constitutes the completely amended deferred compensation plan, as adopted pursuant to Resolution No. 94- The name of this deferred compensation plan is the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the "Plan") . SECTION 2 : Purpose. The primary purpose of this Plan is to attract and retain personnel by permitting them to 'enter into Plan Participation Agreements which will provide future payments in lieu of current income upon death, disability, retirement, or other termination of employment with the Employer. SECTION 3 : Definitions. For the purposes of this Plan, certain words or phrases used herein will have the following meanings: 3.1 "Category A Beneficiary" shall mean any individual designated as the beneficiary by the Participant, either pursuant to the Participation Agreement or pursuant to a later written election filed with the Employer before the death of the Participant. A trust may also be designated as a beneficiary under the Plan, under certain circumstances more specifically described in Subsection 10.6.2 below, but in that case the trust beneficiaries who may receive trust distributions on account of payments from the Plan shall be deemed to be the Category A Beneficiaries under the Plan. No other legal entity, such as a charitable foundation or the estate of the Participant, may be a Category A Beneficiary for the purposes of the Plan. 3 .2 "Category B Beneficiary" shall mean a beneficiary who is designated by the Participant in either the Participation Agreement or a later written election filed with the Employer before the Participant' s death, and who is not a "Category A Beneficiary" within the meaning of Section 1/20/94 1 "0-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-3" 3 .1 above. (Example: a legal entity other than a trust, such as a charitable foundation or the estate of the Participant . ) 3 .3 "Deferred Compensation" shall mean the amount of compensation not yet earned, which the Participant and the Employer mutually agree shall be deferred in accordance with the provisions of this Plan. 3 .4 "Deferred Compensation Investment Fund" shall mean the fund to which all Deferred Compensation is credited, as described in Section 6 .2. 3 .5 "Employee" shall mean any employee who is a director or officer, or who is a permanent, full-time employee of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. 3 . 6 "Employer" shall mean the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. 3 .7 "Includible Compensation" (a term defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 457 (e) (5) and Treasury Regulation section 1.457-2 (e) (2) ) shall mean compensation for services performed for the Employer which is currently includible in gross income, but less any amounts deferred pursuant to a plan described in Internal Revenue Code section 457 (including but not limited to this Plan) or Internal Revenue Code section 403 (b) . The amount of Includible Compensation shall be determined without regard to any community property laws. 3.8 "Investment Account" shall mean a book account for the individual Participant, as more fully described in Section 6 .3 . 3 .9 "Late Retirement" shall mean a termination of service with the Employer which becomes effective after the date on which the Participant has met the requirements to effect a Normal Retirement. 3 . 10 "Normal Retirement" shall mean a termination of service with the Employer which becomes effective on the first day of the calendar month after the Participant meets the minimum age and/or service requirements, for voluntary retirement, specified in the Retirement Plan. 3 .11 "Normal Retirement Age" shall mean the age at which the Participant has met the requirements for Normal Retirement; provided, however, that a Participant who continues to work for the Employer after attaining Normal 1/20/94 2 "0-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-4" Retirement Age may elect, for the purposes of Section 4 .3 below, an alternate Normal Retirement Age, which may be an age greater than age 70%, but which shall be a date or age not later than either (a) any mandatory retirement age specified by the Employer, or (b) the date or age at which the Participant actually separates from service with the Employer. The Participant shall make any such election by delivering to the Employer, prior to separation from service with the Employer, written notice specifying the chosen alternate Normal Retirement Age. Nothing in this Section 3 .11 shall be construed to mean that the Employer has imposed a mandatory retirement age or that the Participant has agreed to retire at a designated age. 3 .12 "Participant" shall mean an Employee who has elected to participate in the Plan. 3.13 "Participation Agreement" shall mean the agreement which is executed by the Employee and filed with the Employer in accordance with Section 4, and pursuant to which the Employee elects to become a Participant in the Plan and defers a portion of his income. 3 .14 "Plan- shall mean the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended 1993, established hereunder. 3 .15 "Plan Year" shall mean the calendar year. 3 .16 "Required Beginning Date" shall mean the latest date that distributions are permitted to commence under Section 10 .4 . 3 .17 "Retirement Plan" shall mean the retirement plan of the Orange County Employees' Retirement System, which is governed by the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (California Government Code section 31450 at sea. ) and is made available to the employees of the Employer pursuant to contract. 3 .18 "Salary" shall mean the full, regular, basic salary which would be paid by the Employer to or for the benefit of the Employee (if he were not a Participant in the Plan) for actual services for the period that he is a Participant. 3 .19 "Termination of Service" shall mean the severance, prior to retirement and other than by death, of the Participant's employment with the Employer. 1/20/94 3 "0-5" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-5" 3 .20 "Unforeseeable Emergency" shall mean a severe financial hardship to the Participant resulting from a sudden and unexpected illness or accident of the Participant or of a dependent (as defined in Internal Revenue Code section 152 (a) ) of the Participant, lose of the Participant' s property due to casualty, or other similar extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances arising as a result of events beyond the control of the Participant . The circumstances that will constitute an Unforeseeable Emergency will depend upon the facts of each case. Examples of what are not considered to be Unforeseeable Emergencies include the need to send a Participant' s child to college or the desire to purchase a home. SECTION 4 : Participation in the Plan. 4 . 1 Any Employee designated by the Employer to be eligible may elect to become a Participant in the Plan by executing and filing a Participation Agreement with the Employer. An election to participate in the Plan and to defer compensation under the Plan shall become effective with respect to compensation earned by the Participant during the period commencing with the beginning date of the first pay period in the month following the month in which the Employer consents to and approves of the Participation Agreement. Such election to defer compensation shall continue thereafter in full force and effect unless and until terminated by the Participant as provided in either Section 4 .4 or Section 11. 4 .2 Each Participation Agreement shall specify the amount of compensation, either by dollar amount or by percentage of Salary (as adjusted for matching and non-matching funds, if applicable) , which is to be deferred pursuant to the Plan and (except in the case of matching and non-matching funds) to be withheld out of the Salary otherwise payable to the Participant for each pay period. The amount deferred each year may not exceed the lesser of: (a) Seventy-Five Hundred Dollars ($7, 500. 00) , reduced by any amount excludable from the Participant' s gross income for the taxable year under section 403 (b) of the Internal Revenue Code on account of contributions made by the Employer; or (b) Thirty-Three and One-Third Percent (33-1/38) of the Participant' s Includible Compensation, reduced by any amount excludable from the Participant's gross income for the taxable year under section 403 (b) of the Internal Revenue Code on account of 1/20/94 4 "0-6" AGENDA ITEM #11(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "04" contributions made by the Employer, or be less than Three Hundred Dollars ($300 . 00) :each year. This three hundred dollar ($300. 00) limitation shall not be applied to any Participant who is paid less than $1, 200.00 per year for services rendered to the Employer. (For practical application, note that 33-1/3$ of Includible Compensation is generally the equivalent of 25% of gross compensation, and that for Participants with an annual salary of less than $30,000, the subparagraph (b) deferral limit usually applies. ) 4 .3 Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 4 .2 herein, during any or all of the last three (3) taxable years ending before a Participant attains Normal Retirement Age (or the alternate Normal Retirement Age chosen pursuant to Section 3 .11 above) , the maximum amount which may be deferred annually shall be the lesser of: (a) Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000.00) , reduced by any amount excludable from the Participant's gross income for the taxable year under section 403 (b) of the Internal Revenue Code on account of contributions made by the Employer; or (b) The sum of: (i) The maximum deferral amount established for the purposes of Section 4 .2 for the taxable year (determined without regard to this Section 4.3) , plus (ii) The maximum deferral amount established in Section 4 .2 for any prior taxable year or years, less the amount of compensation deferred under the Plan, for such prior taxable year or years, pursuant to either Section 4.2 or this Section 4.3 . A prior taxable year shall be taken into account under subdivision (ii) only if: (a) it begins after December 31, 1978; (b) the Participant was eligible to participate in the Plan during all or any portion of the taxable year; and (c) compensation deferred (if any) under the Plan during the taxable year was subject to the maximum deferral amount under Section 4.2 herein. A Participant will be considered to have been eligible to participate in 1/20/94 5 "0-7" AGENDA ITEM #11(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-7" the Plan for a taxable year if the Participant was an Employee for any part of that taxable year. A prior taxable year includes a taxable year in which the Participant was eligible to participate in an Internal Revenue Code section 457 eligible deferred compensation plan sponsored by an entity other than the Employer, provided that such other entity is located in the State of California. 4 .4 A Participant may terminate his election to defer compensation under the Plan by executing and filing with the Employer a written notice at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of termination. In the event a Participant ceases to qualify under Section 3 hereof as a Participant, his election to defer compensation shall automatically terminate on the same date as he becomes ineligible. A Participant (including a former Participant who is again eligible to participate) may not resume the deferral of compensation during the calendar month in which termination occurred; however, he may elect - to resume the deferral of compensation in subsequent calendar months after a lapse of not less than three (3) months. No amounts shall be payable to an Employee upon the termination of deferral of compensation, unless otherwise provided for in either Section 10 or Section 11. 4 .5 A Participant may change the amount of compensation to be deferred in a subsequent calendar month by executing and filing notice with the Employer at least thirty (30) days prior to the beginning of such month; provided, however, that such change may be made not more than four (4) times in a calendar year. 4 .6 In applying the provisions of this Section 4, amounts deferred shall be taken into account at present value in the Plan Year in which deferred. SECTION 5 : Deferral of Compensation. During the period of participation, the Employer shall not pay the Participant his full Salary, but shall defer payment of such part of his Salary as is specified by the Participant in the Participation Agreement, which has been executed and filed with the Employer. SECTION 6 : Administration of the Plan. 6 .1 The Employer shall have full authority and power to adopt the rules and regulations for the administration of the Plan, and to interpret, amend, alter and revoke any rules and regulations so adopted. 1/20/94 6 "0-8" AGENDA ITEM M11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-8" 6 .2 The Employer shall establish a Deferred Compensation Investment Fund to which all Deferred Compensation shall be credited at such times as the amounts deferred would have been payable to the individual Employee if he were not a Participant in the Plan. 6.3 The Employer shall maintain a book account (the "Investment Account") for each Participant, to which shall be credited the Deferred Compensation of the individual Participant. The Participant's Investment Account shall be credited with the earnings thereof, if any, and shall be credited or debited, as the case may be, with the net amount of any gains or losses which may result from the investment of all or any portion of the amount in the Participant' s Investment Account. The Employer, its directors, officers and employees, shall not be liable for any losses on any investment credited to any Investment Account. On a quarterly basis, the Employer shall credit the earnings and/or gains and debit the losses on each Investment Account. Such credits and debits shall be made, and the final quarterly balance of the Investment Account shall be posted, as of the last day of each quarter. SECTION 7: Investments. The Employer is not required to invest the amounts in the Deferred Compensation Investment Fund. However, it is the Employer's intent to invest and reinvest such amounts in a manner intended to increase the same, and the net interest, accumulation and increments thereon shall be credited to, and held in, the Deferred Compensation Investment Fund for the benefit of the Participants, provided that such amounts remain the unrestricted assets of the Employer, as set forth in Section 8 below. The Employer shall not be responsible for any lose due to the investment or failure of investment of such assets; nor shall the Employer be required to replace any lose whatsoever which may result from said investments. SECTION 8 : Assets of County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California. All Deferred Compensation credited to the Deferred Compensation Investment Fund, all property and rights purchased with amounts credited to the Deferred Compensation Investment Fund, and all income attributable to such amounts, property, or rights, shall be and remain (until made available to the Participant or other beneficiary) solely the property and rights of the Employer (without being restricted to the provision of benefits under the Plan) , subject only to the claims of the Employer' s general creditors. without such Employer ownership, the Plan would not qualify as an "eligible deferred compensation plan" within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code section 457, so as to make tax benefits available to the Participants. 1/20/94 7 110-91, AGENDA ITEM #11(C) - ALL DISTRICTS 11 0-9. SECTION 9 : Plan Benefits. Deferred Compensation benefits are payable on the happening of any of the following events : (a) Normal Retirement of a Participant; (b) Late Retirement of a Participant; (c) Termination of Service of a Participant; or (d) Death of a Participant who dies either before or after Deferred Compensation payments commence, and before the entire amount of his Investment Account is paid. SECTION 10 : Distribution of Benefits. 10.1 Termination of Emolovment by Retirement . The Participant is eligible to receive distributions of benefits, with respect to retirement, after the Participant has met the requirements for Normal Retirement and has retired from service with the Employer. The Participant may submit to the Employer an application for distribution of benefits under the Plan as early as the date he notifies the Employer of his intended retirement and as late as thirty (30) days following the actual date of termination of employment due to retirement . Pursuant to such application, the Participant shall elect one of the benefits payment options described below. such election shall become irrevocable upon the lapse of the thirtieth (30th) day following termination of employment with the Employer due to retirement . Following the Participant's termination of employment due to retirement and the receipt of such application, the Employer shall pay to the Participant one of the following benefits (expressed in terms of both payment option and commencement date) as elected by the Participant: PAYNE= OPTION - (a) Consecutive equal monthly payments over a period of 36 months to 180 months, as determined by the Participant; provided, however, that any such period may not extend beyond the life expectancy of the Participant or the joint life and last survivor expectancy of the Participant and the Participant's Category A Beneficiary. (b) Consecutive equal monthly payments for the life of the Participant or for the lives of the Participant 1/20/94 8 110-101, AGENDA ITEM M11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS 110-101, and his Category A Beneficiary. (c) A single payment equal to the balance of: the Participant' s Investment Account. (d) A combination of the benefits described in (a) , (b) and/or (c) above. COMMENCEMENT DATE OPTION - (a) The first day of the third calendar month following the month in which termination of employment occurs, or (b) The first day of a later month as designated by the Participant. (c) In the case of payment option (d) above, a combination of commencement date options (a) and (b) . The foregoing options are limited by, and these payments shall be made subject to, the provisions of Sections 10.3, 10.5, 10. 6 and 10.7 hereof. The total amount of any benefits paid pursuant to payment options (a) through (d) above shall not exceed the sum of the amounts deferred by the Participant, as adjusted for any earnings or losses thereon. Should the Participant fail to elect one of the benefits hereunder by way of an application for retirement benefits filed with the Employer within thirty (30) days after retirement, the Employer shall pay the sum in the Participant's Investment Account according to the "Benefit A" election previously made pursuant to either the Participation Agreement or a modification thereof. However, if there is no such previous election, then the Employer shall pay the sum in the Participant's Investment Account according to payment option (d) above, on the Required Beginning Date. ' 10.2 Termination of Employment Prior to Retirement. Following the Termination of Service of a Participant, the Employer shall pay to the Participant the benefit elected by the Participant pursuant to either (a) "Benefit B" of the Participation Agreement submitted by the Participant at the time of election to participate in the Plan or (b) a later written election delivered to the Employer within thirty (30) days following Termination of Service. The 1/20/94 9 110-111, AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-11" latest such election filed with the Employer shall become irrevocable upon the lapse of the thirtieth (30th) day following Termination of Service. The Participant may choose from both the payment options and the commencement dates as set forth in Section 10.1 above. As with regard to the benefit options expressed in Section 10.1, the benefit options available under this Section 10.2 are limited by, and shall be made subject to, the provisions of Sections 10.3, 10.5, 10.6 and 10.7 hereof. Should the Participant fail to elect one of the benefits hereunder either pursuant to the "Benefit B" provisions of the Participation Agreement or pursuant to a subsequent written election delivered to the Employer within thirty (30) days after Termination of Service, then the Employer shall pay the total amount in the Participant's Investment Account to the Participant in a single lump sum on the first day of the third calendar month following the month in which Termination of Service occurs. In no event, however, shall such payment occur later than the Required Beginning Date. 10.3 Required Beginning Date of Distributions. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, payments under Sections 10.1 and 10.2 shall begin no later than the later of: (a) April 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the Employee attains age 70H; or (b) April 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the Employee retires. 10.4 Acceleration of Payment of Small Investment Accounts. Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 10.1 and 10.2 above, once a Participant has separated from service with the Employer (and is no longer able to defer compensation under the Plan) and when the total balance in that Participant's Investment Account does not exceed $3,500, the Participant shall be entitled to withdraw the entire balance of that Investment Account as a lump sum, by delivering to the Employer a written request for acceleration of payment. If the conditions of the preceding sentence are met, the Employer shall distribute to the Participant the entire remaining balance of the Investment Account within sixty (60) days of receipt of 1/20/94 10 "0-12" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-12" the request. 10 . 5 Lifetime Distribution Recuirements. The distributions under this Plan must be made primarily for the benefit of the Participant and the schedule elected by the Participant for payment of benefits under Sections 10.1 and 10.2 of the Plan must be such that benefits payable to a beneficiary are not more than incidental, according to the applicable Treasury Regulations. Payments under those sections shall be distributed over the life of the Participant or over the lives of the Participant and a Category A Beneficiary (or over a period not extending beyond the life expectancy of the Participant or the joint life and last survivor expectancy of the Participant and a Category A Beneficiary) , in accordance with the Treasury Regulations under Internal Revenue Code section 401 (a) (9) . In addition, as required by Internal Revenue Code section 401 (a) (9) (G) , and except as otherwise provided in Section 10.7 below, all distributions shall be made in accordance with the incidental death benefit requirements of Internal Revenue Code section 401 (a) . As more fully described in the applicable Treasury Regulations, as promulgated pursuant to the authority of Internal Revenue Code section 401 (a) (9) , this means that distributions must be made in accordance with a certain formula designed to ensure that the entire Investment Account of the Participant is distributed over a period of time not to exceed the joint life and last survivor expectancy of the Participant and a Category A Beneficiary who is not more than ten years younger than the Participant. 10 .6 Death of Participant. In the event of the death of the Participant, either before or after termination of employment (by retirement or otherwise) , and before the entire amount of his Investment Account has been distributed, the Employer shall distribute the amount then remaining in the Participant's Investment Account pursuant to Subsections 10.6.1 through 10.6.3 below. 10 . 6 . 1 When Participant Dies on or after the Recuired Beginning Date and after Distributions Have Begun. If distributions have already begun during a Participant' s lifetime, and the Participant dies on or after the Required Beginning Date and before the entire amount of his Investment Account has been distributed, then the remaining portion of the Participant's Investment Account shall be distributed, as elected by the Participant, 1/20/94 11 "0-13" AGENDA ITEM #11(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-13" pursuant to either the "Benefit C" provisions of the Participation Agreement or a later written election delivered to the Employer before the death of the Participant, unless the Participant' s election would permit distributions to be made less rapidly after death than under the method of distribution being used as of the date of death. In order to comply with Internal Revenue Code section 401 (a) (9) , distributions (under this Subsection 10.6.1) after death must be made at least as rapidly as under the method of distribution being used as of the date of death. 10.6.2 When Participant Dies either before the Recuired Beginning Date or before Distributions Have Begun. If a Participant dies either before the Required Beginning Date or before distribution of his Investment Account has begun, and, if any portion of the Investment Account is payable to (or for the benefit of) a Category A or B Beneficiary, then the Employer shall pay such portion as follows - CATEGORY A BENEFICIARIES (1) if the Category A Beneficiary is other than the surviving spouse, the portion of the Investment Account payable to such beneficiary shall be distributed according to one of the following options: (a) consecutive equal monthly payments over -a period of 36 months to 60 months (but not exceeding the life expectancy of the Category A Beneficiary) ; (b) a single lump-sum payment; or (c) a combination of the benefits described in (a) and (b) above. Such distributions. shall begin on the date designated by either the Participant or, if permitted by the Participant, the Category A Beneficiary, but in no event later than December 31 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the Participant dies. (2) if the Category A Beneficiary is the 1/20/94 12 00-14" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-14" surviving spouse of the Participant, the portion of the Investment Account payable to the surviving spouse shall be distributed according to one of the following options : (a) consecutive equal monthly payments over a period not to extend beyond the life expectancy of the surviving spouse; (b) a single lump-sum payment; or (c) a combination of the benefits described in (a) and (b) above. Such distributions shall begin on the date designated by either the Participant or, if permitted by the Participant, the surviving spouse, but in no event later than the later of (i) December 31 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the Participant dies, and (ii) December 31 of the calendar year in which the Participant would have attained age 70%. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if as of the date of the Participant's death, both the surviving spouse and another are Category A Beneficiaries, then distributions shall begin on or before December 31 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which the Participant dies. CATEGORY B BENEFICIARIES (3) if the beneficiary is a Category B Beneficiary, which is a validly existing legal entity (such as a charitable foundation or the estate of the Participant) , the portion of the Investment Account payable to such beneficiary shall be distributed as a lump sum on the first day of the third calendar month following the month in which the death of the Participant occurs. All elections (as to both payment option and commencement date) to be made under this Subsection 10 .6 .2 (1) (2) shall be made by the Participant pursuant to either the "Benefit C" provisions of 1/20/94 13 "0-15" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-15" the Participation Agreement or a later written election delivered to the Employer before the death of the Participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the Participant, in the Participation Agreement or such later written election, may specify that, following the death of the Participant, the Category A Beneficiary may elect, subject to the foregoing limitations, the form of payments and the commencement date of distributions. Any such beneficiary election, however, must be in the form of an irrevocable written election filed with the Employer no later than ninety (90) days following the date of death of the Participant. In the absence of any such timely election, the portion of the Investment Account payable to such Category A Beneficiary shall be distributed to him in a lump sum on the first day of the fifth calendar month following the month in which the death of the Participant occurs. If a Category A Beneficiary dies within six months of the date of the Participant's death and before the entire portion of the Investment Account allocated to him has been paid pursuant to this Subsection 10.6 .2, then the remainder of such portion shall be paid to the contingent beneficiary, if any, designated by the Participant in either the Participation Agreement or a later written election delivered to the Employer before the Participant' s death. If there is no such contingent beneficiary, or if the Category A Beneficiary dies more than six months after the date of the Participant's death and before the entire portion of the Investment Account allocated to him has been paid pursuant to this Subsection 10 . 6.2, then the remainder of such portion shall be paid to the estate of the deceased Category A Beneficiary. Any payment under this paragraph shall be made in a lump sum on the first day of the third calendar month following the month in which the death of the Category A Beneficiary occurs. The Participant may designate a trust as his beneficiary under the Plan. However, in that case, any beneficiary of the trust, who is eligible to receive trust distributions on account of payments from the Plan, shall be deemed to be a Category A Beneficiary under the Plan. (For example, if the Participant designates as his beneficiary a trust of which his surviving spouse is the life 1/20/94 14 "0-16" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-16- beneficiary, and elects lifetime payments under option (2) (a) above, then for the purpose of this Subsection 10 .6 .2, the surviving spouse shall be deemed to be the Category A Beneficiary, and the terms of this subsection shall be applied by basing distributions on the life expectancy of the surviving spouse. ) Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, a trust may only be designated as a beneficiary (and the beneficiary of the trust will only be deemed to be a Category A Beneficiary) if, as of the later of the date that the Participant submits to the Employer the election in which the trust is named as a beneficiary or the Required Beginning Date, and as of all subsequent periods during which the trust is named as a beneficiary of the Plan, all of the following conditions are met: (1) the trust is a valid trust under state law, (2) the trust is irrevocable, (3) the beneficiaries of the trust can be identified from the trust instrument, and (4) a copy of the trust instrument has been provided to the Employer. 10 .6 .3 Default Provision. If, upon the death of the Participant, there exists neither a Category A Beneficiary nor a Category B Beneficiary to receive any portion of the Participant's Investment Account, then the Employer shall, on the first day of the third calendar month following the month in which the death of the Participant occurs, pay that portion in a lump sum to the estate of the Participant. 10.7 General Distribution Recuirements and Provisions. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan to the contrary, all distributions under this Plan shall be made in accordance with the provisions of this Section 10 .7 and, to the extent of any inconsistency, the provisions of this Section 10.7 shall control . 10.7.1 Calculation of Life Expectancy. For the purpose of ascertaining the relevant distribution periods and amounts hereunder, life expectancy, where applicable, shall not be recalculated annually. Rather, once life expectancy has been initially calculated, it shall thereafter be reduced by one year for each year that passes. 10.7 .2 Additional Distribution Recuirements. Any payments payable over a period of more than one year shall only be made in substantially non-increasing 1/20/94 15 "0-17" AGENDA ITEM #11(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-17" amounts, paid not less frequently than annually. 10.7.3 Emnlover Discretion to Accelerate Distributions. After distributions have begun hereunder, if the balance of the Participant' s Investment Account, or any portion thereof payable to a beneficiary, should equal $3500.00 or less, the Employer, in its sole and absolute discretion, may distribute such balance or such portion in a lump sum on the date of the first regularly scheduled payment of the next calendar year. If at any time the Employer determines that the payment schedule as elected by the Participant, or by the Category A Beneficiary, if applicable, is such that monthly payments would be in an amount less than $200.00, then the Employer, in its sole and absolute discretion, may make distributions in the amount of $200.00 per month, until exhaustion of the Investment Account or portion thereof in question, irrespective of the fact that this would have the effect of shortening the distribution period originally elected by the Participant, or the Category A Beneficiary, if applicable. 10.7.4 Statutory Compliance. All distributions under this Plan shall be made in accordance with the Treasury Regulations under Internal Revenue Code section 401 (a) (9) , including both the minimum distribution requirements of Treasury Regulation section 1.401 (a) (9) -1, and, (in accordance with Internal Revenue Code section 401 (a) (9) (G) ) the minimum distribution incidental benefit requirements of Treasury Regulation section 1.401 (a) (9) -2. To the extent that any distribution option hereunder is inconsistent with Internal Revenue Code section 401 (a) (9) , the provisions of Internal Revenue Code section 401 (a) (9) shall control and the Plan shall be administered so as to conform with section 401 (a) (9) . Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if, pursuant to Internal Revenue Code section 457 (d) (2) (B) (i) (I) , Treasury Regulations (the "Superseding Regulations") should he issued which require more rapid distributions than those required by Internal Revenue Code section 401 (a) (9) (G) and the Treasury Regulations under section 401 (a) (9) (G) , then the distributions under this Plan shall be made pursuant to such Superseding Regulations, to the extent inconsistent with section 401 (a) (9) and the Treasury Regulations under that section. 1/20/94 16 "0-18" AGENDA ITEM #11(C) - ALL DISTRICTS 110-18" SECTION 11: Emeraency Withdrawals . In the event of an Unforeseeable Emergency, to be determined by the Employer in its sole discretion, the Employer may pay to the Participant all or any portion of the amount in such Participant' s Investment Account, as of the month end following the date when such determination is made. Payment may not be made to the extent that the hardship resulting from the Unforeseeable Emergency is or may be relieved (a) through reimbursement or compensation by insurance or otherwise, (b) by liquidation of the Participant's assets, to the extent the liquidation of such assets would not itself cause severe financial hardship, or (c) by cessation of deferrals under the Plan. The amount that may be paid out is limited to the amount reasonably necessary to alleviate the Unforeseeable Emergency need and, in most cases, will be paid only in a single lump sum. In the event of an Unforeseeable Emergency which causes the initial lump sum payment to be inadequate to meet the Unforeseeable Emergency need, the Participant (or former Participant) may apply for the payment of subsequent lump-sum amounts, up to the entire amount in the Participant's (or former Participant' s) Investment Account. Any distribution under this section shall be deemed a termination of the election to defer compensation under Section 4 .4 above, and no further deferral of compensation shall be made unless the Participant subsequently re-elects to defer compensation under the Plan, as provided in Section 4.4 . Moreover, any distribution of loot of the Participant's Investment Account under this section shall be deemed a revocation of the Participant' s agreement to participate in the Plan. The (former) Participant may re-elect to participate in the Plan, pursuant to Section 4 .1, after a lapse of not less than three (3) months. SECTION 12 : Non-Assignability Clause. Consistent with Section 8 above, no one, including the Participant, his beneficiary or designee, or any other person, shall have any right to commute, sell, assign, transfer, or otherwise convey the right to receive any payments hereunder, which payments and right thereto are expressly declared to be non-assignable and non-transferable. The Employer shall have no liability to either the Participant or a purported assignee or transferee, on account of any attempted assignment or transfer. In addition, except to the extent otherwise provided by law, no interest of the Participant in the Plan shall be subject to attachment, garnishment or execution, or be transferrable by operation of law, whether due to bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation for the benefit of creditors, or any other cause. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the amounts deferred by a former Participant may be transferred to another Internal Revenue Code section 457 eligible deferred compensation plan of which the former Participant has become a participant, if the 2/20/94 17 110-191, AGENDA ITEM #11(C) - ALL DISTRICTS 110-191, following conditions are met: (1) the plan to which the former Participant wishes to : transfer amounts deferred is located within the State of California; (2) the plan receiving such amounts provides for the acceptance of such amounts; (3) the employer accepting the transfer funds gives written notice of its agreement to accept such transfer and assumes liability therefor; and (4) the Participant provides a written release to the Employer releasing the Employer from any claim or liability under the Plan after the date such transfer of funds occurs. If a Participant separates from service in order to accept employment with another entity which permits the Participant to participate in a section 457 eligible deferred compensation plan, and if the four conditions enumerated above are met, payout of benefits will not commence upon separation from service, notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, and amounts previously deferred will automatically be transferred to that other entity's section 457 eligible deferred -compensation plan, to be credited to the Participant's account. SECTION 13: Notice. Any notice or other communication required or permitted under the Plan shall be in writing, and, if directed to the Employer (ATTN: Director of Finance) , shall be sent to the Employer at its principal office, and, if directed to a Participant or a beneficiary, shall be sent to such Participant or beneficiary at his last-known address as it appears on the Employer's records. Such notice shall be deemed given when mailed, unless notice is given in person, in which case such notice shall be deemed given upon receipt. SECTION 14 : Amendment or Termination of Plan. The Employer may, at any time, terminate this Plan for all Participants. Upon such termination, the Participants in the Plan shall be deemed to have withdrawn from the Plan as of the date of such termination; each Participant's full Salary on a non-deferred basis will be thereupon restored; and the Employer agrees to pay each Participant the amount of money determined as if the Participant had terminated his employment, said payment to be made in accordance with the provisions of Section 10.2. The Employer may also amend the provisions of this Plan at any time; provided, however, that no amendment shall affect the rights 1/20/94 18 "0-20" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-20" of the Participants or their beneficiaries to the receipt of payment of benefits, to the extent of any compensation already deferred at the time of the amendment, as adjusted for investment experience prior to and subsequent to the amendment. The Employer hereby establishes, on the terms and conditions set forth above, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California Deferred Compensation Plan as Amended 1994 . DIS:lw:D: 10/19/92 (L495PN) R: 10/21/92; R:3/5/93; R:7/20/93; R:8/31/93; R:10/8/93 ; R:1/20/94 1/20/94 19 "0-21" AGENDA ITEM #11(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-21" RESOLUTION NO. 94-40-2 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 2-9-R1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-9-Rl :st,e•+x�#.t��,t,tw��:****i,f,tt•••f:fr• WHEREAS, Church Engineering, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the District has concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed project and hereby determines that said project is categorically exempt from further CEQA requirements; and, Section 2. That Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #30(b) - DISTRICT 2 11P-1" by Church Engineering, Districts' engineers' , for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-R1, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 4 . That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and, Section 5. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 13, 1994. HCID.0I0 "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #30(b) - DISTRICT 2 "P-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 29 3, 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON MARCH 9, 1994 g�ilTATlp.y A a� o � � u w 81ew 188 �gA'GE CO"' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE 4 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,6, 7. 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on March 9, 1994, at 7:30 p.m.. In the Districts' AdminisDatiye Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and immicadon the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Fred Barrera,Claimed Gone Beyer i. Pat McGuigan, Chairman pro tom Thomas E.Lun x James M. Ferryman Nate Reade names R.Saltarelli Leslie Pomious y_ Roger Stanton William G.Steiner 4 DISTRICT NO. 2: x John Collins,Chairmen George Soon by Pickier.Chairman pro tam Tom Dal, Fred Bane. Gene Beyer Buck Carlin Chris Nomy Bart, Denes —_ Bob Ben Norman Z. Eckenrode MlcMel Maemweiler William D. Millions, James H.Flora Caney J. Nelsen Glenn Porker Miguel Pulido y_ Thomas E.Luts Roger Stanton William G. Steiner L Daniel T.Welch Jahn M. Gulliason George L.2laket Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO.3: 1 Sal A.Studied, Chairman William C.Estrada _ Berge Dunlap, Chairman pro tem Carney J.Nelson George Brown Gwen A.Forsythe Buck Catlin Chris Henry John Collins George Scott James H. Flo. William D. Mahoney y_ Don R.Griffin _ Donal Bence • Wally Linn Eva G.Miner • Thomas E.Lutz fat McGuigan y_ Linda Moulton-Petmrson Earle Robitaille • Focused Penn Joyce C.Nicholson • Iry Rckler Tam Daly Margie L Rice James V. Eiden Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket Roger Stamen William G. Steiner x Charles S,Nia Anthony SeNaggi DISTRICT NO. 5: John C.Co.,Jr.,Chairman Jan Debar Mil Sansone.Chairman We tam Jan Debar L William G. Stdner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A.Weisser, Chairman Arthur Perry _JL Evelyn Hart.Chairman pro teen John C.Co.,Jr. William G. Stdnar Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: . Be"Hammond. Chairman Mike Ward . James A.Wanner. Chairman pro teen Mike Scheeler Fred Barters Gene Bayer Jan Debay Mil Sansone y_ Ted Moreno _ Miguel Pulido a Charles E. Puckett _ Thomas R.Saltarelli William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: Grace Wmhill, Chairman Ease Robitaie Victor Leipzig.Chairman pro teen Dnds Moulhon-PoOerson _JL Roger Stanton William G. Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: J[_ John M.GNliason, Chairman Daniel T.Welch Fred Barnes, Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer a Glenn Parker B orm Dunlap Iry Noted Tom Daly e William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: . Peer A.Swan,Chairman Darryl Miller _x Leslie Porrtieu5, Chairman pro ter Chaves E. Puckett Fred games Gene Beyer a Bony Hammond Mike Weld William G. Steiner Roger Stanton —2— 03/09/94 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Carl E. Beach, Pat Brady, Peter Brown, Mike Broyles, Frank Chavez, Corinne Clawson, Don Crapnell, James Elo, Dave Erdkamp, John Finias, Chuck Frey, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, Tod Jacobson, Larry Lazorek, Mark Legg, John Linder, Robert Morris, Karl Nordgren, Bob Ooten, Joseph Park, William Pierce, L. Ellen Ray, Lynn Redman, Phil Serrantino, Mary Simpson, Manny Stoffer, Jim Tintle, Jack Vincent, Mike Wilson, Chuck Winsor, Jeff Woodward, Ray Young OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Jim Evans, Bill Fleming, David L. Hamilton, Chris Knap, Bill Knopf, Tom Nixon, Jim Silva, Dan Spradlin, Phil Stone DISTRICT 3 In the absence of Chairman Sal Sapien and Appointment of Chairman pro tem Chairman pro tem Burnie Dunlap, Director Wally Linn was appointed Chairman pro tem of District No. 3. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized L. Ellen Ray, an Recognition of persons who wish to be employee on the bargaining committee for the heard on matters of general interest Operations and Maintenance Employees, who addressed the Boards in regard to a packet that was distributed to Directors that evening by the committee. The Joint Chairman also recognized David Hamilton, business agent for the IUOE Local 501 Operating Engineers, who also addressed the Boards in regard to the current meet and confer process pertaining to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the Operations and Maintenance Employee Unit, urging the Boards to consider the Union's proposal (passed out earlier) on meet and confer matters. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman Presentation of resolutions of presented plaques and resolutions of appreciation and plagues to retiring appreciation to retiring active directors Directors James Evans, who represented the Midway City Sanitary District on the Board of District No. 3, and Jim Silva who represented the City of Huntington Beach on the Board of District No. 3. -3- 03/09/94 The Joint Chairman reported that retiring active directors Bob Bell, former representative from Villa Park; Gail Kerry, former representative from Cypress: Eva Miner, former representative from La Palma; Maria Moreno, former representative from Placentia; Robert Richardson, former representative from Santa Ana; and Hank Wades, former representative from Yorbe Linda, were unable to attend the meeting that evening. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the tentatively Report of the Joint Chairman scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, March 16th, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, March 23rd, at 5:30 p.m. (Directors Jan Debay and Barry Denes were also invited to attend.) Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers - Wednesday, March 30th, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that the New Report of the General Manager Directors' Orientation and Treatment Plant Tour was scheduled for Saturday, March 19th from 9:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. For those Directors who had not responded with regard to their attendance to the orientation and tour, the General Manager requested that they complete the form that was placed in their folders that evening. ' DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 03/09/94 DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to Aooroval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ` DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 02/09/94 02/23/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $538,036.05 $803,402.14 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 385,751.73 1,848,590.58 Joint Working Capital Fund - 151,387.48 152,171.14 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,700.91 26,613.41 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 8,237.84 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 24,875.26 2,732.08 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 46,562.38 16,759.21 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 329,467.16 714.54 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 4,854.24 21,475.30 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 44,654.43 42,360.06 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 12,416.24 8,082.35 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 102.84 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 2,829.82 540.04 DISTRICT NOS. 1 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 320.10 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT 10,988.15 578,741.94 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 16.10 2,103.18 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT 0.00 298.18 51.572.880.63 53.504.904.25 -5- 03/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awardina Purchase of One Self-Propelled Aerial Work Platform. That the bid tabulation and recommendation re Specification No. E-241 award of Purchase of One Self-Propelled Aerial Work Platform, Specification No. E-241, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to American Hi-Lift for a total amount not to exceed $74,785.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Amendment No. 1 to the contract for Purchase of Hydrogen That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Peroxide. Soecification No. P-140. Resolution No. 94-32, approving Amendment assianino contract from Peroxidation No. 1 to the contract for Purchase of Hydrogen Systems. Inc. to Vulcan Peroxidation Peroxide, Specification No. P-140, assigning said Systems Inc. contract from Peroxidation Systems, Inc. to Vulcan Peroxidation Systems Inc., with no change in the terms and provisions of the original contract dated October 1, 1993. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to PacTel Meridian Systems for That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Amendment No. 2 to the Telephone a purchase order to PacTel Meridian Systems for System Maintenance Aareement for Amendment No. 2 to the Telephone System the Districts' telephone PBX and related Maintenance Agreement for the Districts' equipment (Specification No. S-0601 telephone PBX and related equipment (Specification No. S-060), to extend said agreement for a six-month period from February 22, 1994 through August 21, 1994, for an amount not to exceed $15,468.00 for existing equipment. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Purchase of Four Intermediate Size Four-Door Sedans. Specification No. V-003 The Directors entered into a lengthy discussion questioning the justification for purchasing two of the four vehicles proposed for procurement. The two vehicles requested by the Engineering Department (planning/design and construction management) were additional vehicles, not replacement, and the Director of Engineering commented on their proposed use. In response to a question concerning use of Districts' vehicles versus reimbursing an employee for use of their personal vehicle, staff and counsel explained that use of Districts' owned vehicles was preferred because of insurance issues. Directors also asked about the policy for assigning vehicles to individuals to drive home and requested that staff prepare a report. Following the discussion, the following action was taken: -6- 03/09/94 Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Swift Dodge for the Purchase of Two Intermediate Size Four-Door Sedans. Specification No. V-003 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Swift Dodge for the Purchase of Two Intermediate Size Four-Door Sedans, Specification No. V-003, for a total amount not to exceed $21,938.00 plus sales tax, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Procurement Program of the State of California, and State of California Contract No. 1-94-23-10, said vehicles to be used to replace existing vehicles in the motor pool and the Operations division. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chanae Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and No. P2.23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2), authorizing a net addition of $36,228.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. for three items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chanae Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and No. P2-42-2 specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, authorizing a net deduction of $24,407.00 from the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for four items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 12 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and No. P2-43-1 specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. 132-43-1, authorizing a net deduction of $48,807.00 from the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for 16 items of added or deleted work, be, and is hereby, approved. -7- 03/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1 Approvina Chance Order No. 7 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-42-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 7 to the plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, authorizing a net addition of $1,032.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper Construction Co., Inc. for three items of additional work, granting a time extension of 503 calendar days for completion of said additional work, and assessment of liquidated damages at $2,000 per day for 26 days, be, and is hereby, approved. Acceotina Job No. P2-42-1 as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adapt Resolution No. 94-33, accepting Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Summons and Complaint. Roadway Construction Co.. That the Summons and Complaint, Roadway Inc. vs. Javaid Contractors. Inc. and Construction Co., Inc. vs. Javaid Contractors, County Sanitation Districts of Oran Inc. and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Harbor Judicial District Case County, Harbor Judicial District Case No. 94C0873 No. 94C0873, relative to a stop notice filed by a subcontractor against Districts' contractor, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. -8- 03/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: - Receive. file and approve staff Summary Fnancial Report for That the staff Summary Financial Report for the the six-month Period ending six-month period ending December 31, 1993, December 31, 1993 be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ' ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive. file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee and That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy Executive Committee Committee and Executive Committee meetings held on February 16, 1994 and February 23, 1994, respectively, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to negotiate a one-year extension of contract with KPMG Peat That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to Marwick for annual services for the negotiate a one-year extension of contract with 1993-94 fiscal Year KPMG Peat Marwick for annual audit services for the 1993-94 fiscal year. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to solicit proposals for a multi-year engagement beginning with That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit 1994-95 for fiscal year auditing from the proposals for a multi-year engagement beginning "Bin Six" accountina firms and any other with 1994-95 for fiscal year auditing from the qualified accounting firm "Big Six" accounting firms and any other qualified accounting firm that has submitted a request to be included, for consideration by the Fiscal Policy Committee. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -9- 03/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1 . Job No. P1-48: Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2). Job No. P2-47-2: Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-56: and Seismic Retrofit Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-2 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that in December 1993, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P11-48; Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2. This project includes several jobs designed by both consultants and staff, combined to reduce administrative costs as well as attract lower combined bids through economies of scale. Mr. Dawes stated that on February 1, 1994, four bids were received for this project. The bids ranged from a high of $1,774,430.00 to a low of $1,003,899.00, submitted by Pascal & Ludwig Engineers and recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. The engineer's estimate was $1,350,000.00. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Plans and specifications for Job Nos. P1-48, P2-47-2. P2-56 and P2-53-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. Pt-48; Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, changing the date for receipt of bids from January 11, 1994 to February 1, 1994, be, and is hereby, approved. -10- 03/09/94 Approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Job Nos. P1-48, P2-47-2. P2-56 and P2-53-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7.48; Miscellaneous Work (re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2.47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Awarding Job Nos. P1-48. P2-47-2. P2-56 and P2-53-2 to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-34, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work (re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. 132-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. 132.53-2, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount of $1,003,899.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Continuino consideration of action adopting Resolution No. 94-34 awarding Job Nos. P7-48, P2-47-2. P2-56 and P2-53-2 to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers Upon return from closed session where the Boards received a report from the General Counsel pertaining to potential litigation against the Districts as owners for work being performed by Pascal & Ludwig Engineers on Miscellaneous Improvements and Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-42, and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, during which two of the contractor's employees were killed in an industrial accident, the Directors entered into a lengthy discussion concerning the propriety of awarding the contract for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-48; Miscellaneous Work (re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic ` Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, because of questions about the accident on Job No. P2-49. _11_ 03/09/94 It was then moved and seconded: That the Boards of Directors reconsider the previous action adopting Resolution No. 94-34, awarding contract for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2-47-2, Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers in the total amount of $1,003,899.00. The project was bid on February 1 , 1994 and, according to the plans and specifications, the Districts have 60 days to award the contract (April 2, 1994). The Boards discussed whether to seek an extension of the 60-day award period from the contractor to allow a review of the circumstances pertaining to the accident or whether to reject all bids and rebid the job. Following further discussion the motion was withdrawn and a new motion was made and seconded: That all bids received for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 21, Job No. P2-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, be rejected. In the context of overall considerations, Directors pointed out that extending the award period would allow a review of the Districts' and contractors' safe work environment issues together with safety policies and procedures. Following further discussion the motion to reject all bids was withdrawn. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the prior action to adopt Resolution No. 94-34 be set aside; and that action to adopt Resolution No. 94-34 awarding a contract for the listed jobs be continued for 60 days; and that staff be directed to confer with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, the low bidder for said project, to obtain their consent to a delay in the award beyond that prescribed in the contract documents to allow the Districts to review safety procedures, policies, practices and records for construction on Districts' property. It was noted that if this consent was not granted by the low bidder, then all bids would expire and the project would have to be rescheduled for re-bidding. -12- 03/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors the Convene in closed session pursuant to need for a closed session as authorized by Government Code Section 54957.6 and Government Code Section 54957.6 and 54956.9 54956.9 to review: 1) The respective positions of the Districts' and the Districts' employee groups with the Districts' designated representatives regarding the salaries, benefits and terms of employment of the Districts' employees and to provide instructions to said representatives. 2) The potential litigation arising out of a construction accident on the Districts' plant site. Director Stanton requested clarification prior to convening in closed session that the Directors would not engage in any discussion of recent newspaper reports (concerning problems on four Districts' construction projects). He expressed his opinion that any such discussions should be done in public session. The Joint Chairman agreed. He stated, however, that two of the reports (namely, the status of pending litigation involving Cooper Industries, Brinderson Corporation and the Districts relating to breach of contract for purchase and installation of central generation engine-generator sets, and the status of potential litigation against contractors who installed facilities for the Odor Control Project) would probably need to be discussed in closed session as they involve possible litigation. Directing Executive Committee to define scope of work for a review of the Districts' construction projects referred to in recent press accounts, with authority to direct or expand the scope, and to request proposals for said review for consideration by the Boards It was then moved and seconded that the Boards direct the Executive Committee to consider at its next meeting, whether to retain an independent consultant to undertake value engineering and investigate the issues set out in The Register article; and, if the Executive Committee approves the hiring of a consultant, that the Executive Committee be authorized to solicit proposals. During discussion that followed it was clarified that the consultant would be reporting to the Directors and not to the staff or legal counsel. Also discussed was whether it was within the Executive Committee's discretion, after considering the issues, to proceed with the review and, if so, to solicit consulting proposals for the Boards' consideration in order that it may be accomplished as quickly as possible. The maker of the motion, with the concurrence of the seconder, then clarified that the intent of the motion included authorization for the Executive Committee to get - the ball rolling and to interview people to start the process. -13- 03/09/94 A brief discussion followed pertaining to a suggestion to further define exactly what was proposed to be studied because of potential costs, and whether the review should be by a third party or could be done in-house. After further discussion among the Directors, Districts' General Counsel advised that since the matter is moving in a different direction than just setting it on the agenda for the next Executive Committee meeting, and is being discussed with the probability of taking action on something, the Directors needed to have a 2/3 vote to add this item to the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2 as an emergency item that arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda or if it is deemed to be an emergency item. It was then moved and seconded to add this item to the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2. During the discussion that followed, General Counsel was asked for an opinion as to whether this could be considered an emergency item. Mr. Woodruff stated that an item can be added on to the agenda if the item arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda 72 hours prior to the meeting. If the Boards make the finding that it is, in fact necessary to act upon the item, then it can be added. It does, however, require a 2/3 vote. The Joint Chairman then asked if there was any opposition to the motion of adding this item to the agenda. Directors Grace Winchell, George Brown, Richard Partin, Carrey Nelson, Daniel T. Welch, Charles E. Puckett and William D. Mahoney opposed. Chairman Mahoney declared that the motion carried adding the item on to the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54952.2. Directors then requested clarification as to whether the Executive Committee could forego an outside review if a majority of the Executive Committee would feel that the written response by the General Manager satisfactorily answers the questions that have been raised. The Joint Chairman stated that the Executive Committee would do whatever the Boards direct them to do but the option of not proceeding with the outside review was not part of the current motion. It was also suggested that the Executive Committee should have to argue a rationale for proceeding before the Boards before going forward with a review. -14- 03/09/94 Following further discussion some of the Directors expressed concern over the cost of an outside consultant. Directors expressed concern that the scope of work and objectives be well thought out and that the cost not be open-ended. There was a request for further clarification of the motion as to whether or not the Executive Committee could have authority to merely solicit proposals or to, in fact, engage a consultant. There was also some discussion about the accuracy of The Register articles, and other current events influencing the issue. Also discussed was the probable benefits of a third party review to sort out the issues and develop any recommended improvements in policies and procedures or changes in current policy of utilizing consultants versus increased staffing. Staff was also asked to provide copies of documents requested by The Register to the Executive Committee. A substitute motion was then made and seconded to direct the Executive Committee to define the scope of work, request proposals and bring the proposals back to the entire Board of Directors for final review. Following further discussion concerning clarification of the substitute motion and whether it was necessary to investigate The Register's allegations, a second substitute motion was made and seconded that the Executive Committee employ an independent investigator/consultant to perform an audit on operational and technical procedures. After discussion of the second substitute motion, it was withdrawn by the maker. Following further discussion the substitute motion was restated as follows: To direct the Executive Committee to define the scope of work, request proposals and bring the proposals back to the Boards for final review and decision, and to allow the Executive Committee to include but not limit it to The Register article, or expand it to possibly include input from other Directors. The motion carried with Joint Chairman Mahoney and Vice Joint Chairman Puckett abstaining. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: The Boards convened in closed session at 9:02 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54957.6 and 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 9:41 p.m. the Boards reconvened in regular Reconvene in recular session session. -15- 03/09/94 DISTRICT 1 Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint for Property Damage. La Veta Monterey Condominium Association. a California non-profit. mutual benefit corooration: and Robert Seaesta. an individual vs. Mladen Buntich Construction Company. Inc. and County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County. Orange County Superior Court. Case No. 726220 Authorizing consideration of Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint for Property Damage. La Veta Monterey Condominium Association. a California non-profit. mutual benefit corporation, and Robert Senesta, an individual vs. Mladen Buntich Construction Company. Inc. and County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court. Case No. 726220 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors does hereby authorize consideration of a supplemental agenda item relative to Summons and Complaint for Property Damage, La Vets Monterey Condominium Association, a California non-profit, mutual benefit corporation; and Robert Segesta, an individual vs. Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. and County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 726220, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. -16- 03/09/94 Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Property Damaae. - La Vets Monterey Condominium Association. a California non-profit. mutual benefit corporation: and Robert Seoesta. an individual vs. Mladen Buntich Construction Company. Inc. and County Sanitation District No. 1 of Oranae County. Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 726220 The General Counsel stated that the Summons and Complaint was in reference to property damaged in connection with construction of the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, a joint project between Districts 1 and 2 and the cities of Orange and Santa Ana. During the course of excavation and during rainstorms, a water main broke resulting in some property damage. He further reported that the District has a construction agreement with the contractor, Mladen Buntich Construction Company. The contract has indemnity provisions and the District is entitled to and will require the contractor to secure counsel and represent the interests of the District. The project was completed in July 1993. Following a brief discussion regarding the nature of the damages, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Summons and Complaint for Property Damage, La Veta Monterey Condominium Association, a California non-profit, mutual benefit corporation; and Robert Segesta, an individual vs. Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. and County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 726220, relative to property damage sustained during the construction of the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the District. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. -17- 03/09/94 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: • Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Aareement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee certification of the Corporation for preparation of plans and final negotiated fee relative to the Professional specifications for Contract No. 6-13 Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of plans and specifications relative to Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-35-6, approving said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $57,585.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. -18- 03/09/94 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. ALI Assistant Secr y f Boards of Directors of County Sa it ion s icts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 14 -19- FUND NO 9199 - jr DIST VJbRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2103194 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/09/94 POSTING DATE 02/09/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 135546 AS TECH COMPANY $50.382.14 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 135547 AMERICAN TELEPHONE B TELEGRAPH $989.19 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 135548 ABLE INDUSTRIES $954.20 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SUPPLIES 135549 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP. $9,298.00 ENGINE TESTING J-19 135550 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $53,364.00 O&M AGREEMENT O%Y GEN.SYST.M.O.B-Mg 135551 ALPHAGAZ $1,482.38 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135552 STN-CLOUMBUS $12.99 SUBSCRIPTION 135553 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $270AG REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 135554 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $275.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135555 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $7,129.82 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135556 ASSOC.ADMINIS.&CONSULTANTS $500.00 DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS 135557 AMSA $12,803.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES M.O.1-12-94 135558 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $1,613.62 PAYROLL SERVICES 135559 AWARDS&TROPHIES $24.46 PLAQUES 135560 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $9.853.31 LAB SUPPLIES 135MI BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $430.06 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 135562 BELL SECURITY $671.00 SECURITY SERVICES 135%3 WT BILLARD $35.52 BUILDING REPAIRS fTt 135564 SIOSAFETY SYSTEMS,INC. $57.38 LAB SUPPLIES = 135565 810 VENTURES,INC. $162.00 LAB SUPPLIES �-+ 135566 BLACK&VEATCH $31,504.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES PIAG CO 135567 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $519.27 LAB SUPPLIES 135568 BROWN B CALDWELL CONSULTANTS $16,920.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 93.101 135569 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES D 135570 BUSH B ASSOCIATES,INC. $17.152.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10.92 I-+ 135571 CH2M HILL $8.410.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 135572 CRC PRESS,INC. $42.50 LAB SUPPLIES 135573 CRTC-CWPCA,INC. $315.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 135574 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $19,049.54 ENGINEERING SERVICES PIJ8,PI-34 135575 FIBERGRATE/CHEMWEST $3.146.30 PUMP PARTS 135576 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $30.97 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135577 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $786.69 LAB SUPPLIES 135578 COMPUSA,INC. $4.314.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135579 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $187.57 TRUCK PARTS 135580 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1,636.75 ELECTRIC PARTS 135581 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS $49.84 PRINTING SERVICES 135582 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $194.93 TOOLS 135583 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $2.230.43 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 135584 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $10,823.00 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 135585 DAPPER TIRE $413.76 TIRES 135586 PETER C.DAVID CO. $27,620.10 CONSTRUCTION 7-20 135587 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $4,768.57 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-11-93 135588 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $122.84 PRINTING 135589 DANNY L.DILLON $10,000.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 135590 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $820.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 135591 DUNKEL BROS MACH.MOVING $641,25 EQUIPMENT MOVING FUND NO 9199 - Jr DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE DOWN PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02MR194 POSTING DATE 02109/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT . 135592 EASTMAN.INC. $5,380.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135593 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $833.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135594 EMERGENCY LIFELINE INC. $1,356.03 EMERGENCY SUPPLIES 136595 ENCHANTER,INC. $5.040.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 135596 ENTECH LAB AUTOMATION $223.25 LAB EQUIPMENT 135597 ESSENCE GROUP $480.94 COMPUTER PARTS 135598 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $339.40 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 135599 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $747.79 AIR FREIGHT 135500 FERRELLGAS $68.10 PROPANE 135601 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1,020.18 FILTERS 135602 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $216.45 LAB SUPPLIES 135603 FOOTHILL PROJECT MANAGEMENT $1.669.00 RESIDENT NOTIFICATION SERVICES 1356D4 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $8,440.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES 135605 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $150.38 PHOTO SUPPLIES 136606 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $12,D66.96 WATER USE 135607 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $2,150.00 APPLICATION FEE 135608 CRY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $257.25 PERMIT FEE f11 135609 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $346A0 PAINT SUPPLIES X 136610 THE FOXBORO CO. $31&66 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES Z 135611 FREEDOM IMAGING $60.86 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135612 FREEMEN ALTERNATIVE RESOURCES $4.756.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 135613 CRY OF FULLERTON $99.45 WATER USE 135614 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3.708.76 CHEMICALS 135615 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION $50,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-SA 1 135616 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. S4,422.27 TELEPHONE SERVICES N 135617 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $630.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 135618 GRASSY S.T.I. $1,437.27 CENTRAL GENERATION PARTS 135619 DGA CONSULTANTS $2.860.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10.92 135620 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $240.00 TRUCK PARTS 135621 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. $432.17 MECHANICAL PARTS 135622 HEATHER HICKERSON $1.211.86 VEHICLE DAMAGE 135623 HOMES&NARVER,INC. S43,975.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI44 135624 HOME DEPOT $229.80 14ARDWARE 135625 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN $68.91 BICYCLE PARTS 135626 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $77.819.65 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92 135627 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $460.91 CONNECTORS 135628 INTERMEC $161.06 LAB SUPPLIES 135629 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $852.67 BATTERIES 13563D IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $132.36 WATER USE 135631 JAY'S CATERING $374.98 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 135632 JENSEN TOOLS,INC. $134.06 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 135633 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $934.95 ELECTRIC PARTS 135634 KAMAN BEARINGS&SUPPLY $1.790.81 MACHINE SUPPLIES 135635 THE KEITH COMPANIES $5.423.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-36R 135636 KING BEARING,INC. $1,469.37 MACHINE SUPPLIES 135637 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $500.23 TOOLS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2103/94 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 021=94 POSTING DATE 02JO9194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136638 LEGI-TECH $320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 135639 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENOR. $43,561.03 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1d0-1&2 135640 LORAIN PRODUCTS $1.251.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135641 M13C APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $970.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 135642 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $477.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135643 MPS $117.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 135W MACOMCO $412.85 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135645 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $373.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135646 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $80T62 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 135647 IRS MEANS CO.,INC. $90.42 PUBLICATION 135648 MERIDIAN DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $298.75 LAB SUPPLIES 135649 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS $75,332.88 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENTS 135650 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $3,815.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 135651 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $211.82 LAB SUPPLIES 135652 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,306.24 UNIFORM RENTALS 135653 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $1,020.00 LAB SERVICES 135654 MONTROY SUPPLY CO. $49.82 SIGNS m 135655 MOTION INDUSTRIES.INC. $978.07 PUMP PARTS X 135656 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $%35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS z 135657 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1.931.91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135658 NEW AGE WATER TECHNOLOGY $9.02 VALVES 135659 NEW ENGLAND BIOLASS,INC. $356.40 LAB SUPPLIES 135660 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $4.79 WATER USE Y 135661 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $251.23 TRUCK PARTS I 135662 ORANGE COURIER $267.00 COURIER SERVICES W 135663 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,252.11 FITTINGS 135664 ORRICK HERRINGTON&SUTCLIFFE $30.000.00 SPECIAL COUNCIL-TAXABLE COMMER.PAPER M.OA 1-10-93 135665 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,940.95 SPECIALTY GASES 135666 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $10,989.05 REIMBURSE WORKERS'COMP.INSURANCE 135667 PSI $385.50 STEAM CLEANING SERVICES 135668 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF CC) $40.84 OPERATING SUPPLIES 135669 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $8.624.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135670 PACIFIC PARTS $452.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135671 PACIFIC PNEUMATICS,INC. $47.52 FILTER 135672 PACIFIC PUBLISHERS $124.84 PUBLICATION 135673 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $214.65 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135674 PACIFIC BELL $691.63 TELEPHONE SERVICES 135675 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $159.65 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 135676 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $939.90 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 135677 PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $1,338.90 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 135678 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 135679 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $179.69 LAB SUPPLIES 135680 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $48.056.57 CHEMICALS 135681 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $141,796.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.541-91 135682 PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP. $183.18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 135683 POLYPURE,INC. $16.818.37 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3.11-92 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2I03194 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02MW/94 POSTING DATE 02109(94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135664 POWER DESIGN $6,107.32 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 135685 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $598.43 SOILTESTING 135686 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $5.048.40 CONSULTING SERVICES-FINANCIAL 135687 QUEST MEDIA B SUPPLIES $1,297.24 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135688 QUESTRON CORP. $2,470.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135689 RMB ENGINEERINGIMILLTRONICS $4.663.01 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135690 RM CONTROLS $421.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135691 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $6,093.19 ELECTRIC MOTORS 135692 R.S.CABINET CO. $323.25 PLANHOLDCABINET 135693 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $1,130.43 LAB SUPPLIES 135694 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $2.624.88 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135695 ROBBINS SCIENTIFIC $301.76 LAB SUPPLIES 135698 ROSEMOUNT.INC. $62.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135697 RYAN-HERCO 3463.08 METAL 135698 S S J CHEVROLET $490.12 TRUCK REPAIRS 135699 SKC WEST 3840.60 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135700 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1,742.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135701 DOUG SARVIS $750.00 CPRIFIRSTAIDTRAINING fn 135702 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $156.932.20 CONSTRUCTION 5.36 X 135703 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $683.56 SPECIALTY OASES x 13570 CITY SEAL BEACH E251.95 WATER USE � 135705 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,217.92 TOOLS 135706 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $436.48 TRUCK PARTS Y 136707 SHURELUCK SALES $2.870.66 TOOLSOIARDWARE 135708 SIDU MFG CO. $3.294.29 PLUMBING SUPPLIES t 1357DO SIGNAL FLASH CO. $460.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 135710 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,065.50 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 135711 SMITH-EMERY CO. $60.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 136712 SMITH PIPE 6 SUPPLY $66.67 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135713 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $259.24 TOOLS 135714 SOFFA ELECTRIC,INC. $92.424.15 CONSTRUCTION J-28 135715 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $16,895.81 POWER 136710 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $9.895.79 NATURAL GAS 135717 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $7.232.10 DIESEUUNLEADED FUEL 135718 SOUTH PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL $2.941.58 CHEMICALS 135719 SOUTH SHORE WINDOW MAINT. $2.083.34 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 135720 SOUVENIR PHOTO $829.15 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 135721 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $3,080.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 135722 WESTALLOY,INC. $478.73 WELDING SUPPLIES 135723 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $557.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135724 STANDARD REGISTER CO. $635.84 LAB SUPPLIES 136725 STATE STREET BANK $5,847.71 TRUSTEE SERVICES 135726 GARY G.STREED $7.882.72 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 136727 SUMMIT STEEL $4,056.03 METAL 135728 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $10.74 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 135729 SUPER CHEM CORP. $810.87 CHEMICALS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2103/94 PAGE 05 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/09M POSTING DATE 02/09/94 WARRANTNO, VENDOR AMOUNT 135730 TCH ASSOCIATES $1,279.40 LAB SUPPLIES 135731 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $1.506.04 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 135732 TEKDRAULICS $7.086.60 MECHANICAL PARTS 135733 TEKTRONIX,INC. $3.191.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135734 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $1,630.29 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 135735 THOMAS BROS MAPS $197.95 PRINTING 135736 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,004.89 MECHANICAL PARTS 135737 TIS TROPICAL FISH $118.63 LAB SUPPLIES 136730 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $109.91 LOCKS&KEYS 135739 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $1271.00 TRAVEL SERVICES 135740 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $1,095.55 TRUCK PARTS 135741 TRUCO,INC. $94.82 LAB SUPPLIES 135742 TRUESDAIL LABS $2.261.78 LAB SERVICES 135743 TWINING LABORATORIES $5,479.44 LAB SERVICES 1357" U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $162.86 TRUCK PARTS 135745 UHLER,INC. $166,163.40 CONSTRUCTION 5.32&5-33 135746 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $375.05 PARCEL SERVICES M 135747 UNITED STATES BIOCHEMICAL $214.47 LAB SUPPLIES X 135748 UPCHURCH SCIENTIFIC $418.60 LAB SUPPLIES = 135749 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4,746.71 LAB SUPPLIES UZ 135750 VALIN CORPORATION $100.90 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES PLUMBING --4 136752 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. .631.95 COMPUTER DATA 1 135753 VERTEXCOAST $1,731.72 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT a 135753 WESTRN INSTRUMENTS E071.01 GAUGE 135765 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY E20 157.1 CAUSTIC SODA LIES 12-92 135756 WEST.LITE SUPPLY SALES. $995.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 135757 WILDLIFE LAB SALES,INC. $212.50 LAB SUPPLIES 135758 WILJOHN ILEYMANAGEMENT& S,INC,INST. $371.00 PUBLICATION 135759 JOHN WILEY 8 SONS,INC. $376.00 PUBLICATION 135760 ROURKXEROX ,WOODRUFF 83PRADLIN $22,176.18 LEGAL COPIER LEASES M.O.2-19-92 175780 XEROX CORP. E776.18 COPIER LEASES 135761 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $947.96 VALVES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 02/09/84 $1,572,880.63 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2O3194 PAGE O6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/09/94 POSTING DATE 02/09/94 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $8,237.84 #2 OPER FUND 24,875.26 #3 OPER FUND 41,139.09 03 CAP FAC FUND 5,423.29 #5 OPER FUND 4,742.90 #5 CAP FAC FUND 324,724.25 #6 OPER FUND 4,854.24 107 OPER FUND 7,305.05 07 CAP FAC FUND 37,349.38 #11 OPER FUND 7,386.64 #11 CAP FAC FUND 5,029.60 #13 OPER FUND 102.64 #14 OPER FUND 732.40 rn #14 CAP FAC FUND 2,097.42 X #566 OPER FUND 3.146.30 _ 9586 CAP FAC FUND 7,841.85 b7 Do #667 OPER FUND 16.10 JT 05 � CORPER FUND 385,751.73 COR 312,700.91 n SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 12,700.91 Q1 I JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 151,307.48 $1.572,880.63 FUND NO' 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2JIW94 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 223/90 POSTING DATE 2/23/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 135793 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES $809.80 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135794 AG TECH COMPANY $55.898.30 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 135795 AT&T $3,688.35 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 135796 AT&T $301.98 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 135797 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $63.34 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS 135798 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $225.652.50 CONSTRUCTION P2-57-1 135799 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1.379.20 MECHANICAL PARTS 135800 AMERICAN CABLING&COMM. $50.64 CABLE 135801 AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION $59.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135802 AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO. $4,875.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-51 135803 AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO. $22.548.50 SEWER REPAIRS 136804 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $500.00 SEWER REPAIRS 135805 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $4.28 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 135808 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $957.90 VALVES 135807 APEX DRUM CO. $173.00 DRUM PICK-UP 136808 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,574.07 NOTICES&ADS 135809 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $5.403.04 LAB SUPPLIES 135810 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $718.30 COMPUTER SOFTWARE TrI 135811 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,291.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES X 135812 ARMOR-VAC $420.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES = 135813 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $1.411.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL CO 135814 ASSOC.ADMINIS.&CONSULTANTS $7,865.72 SFI INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS '--� 135815 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135816 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $5,394.89 PAYROLL SERVICES py 135817 THE AVEBURY GROUP $6,996.68 MECHANICAL PARTS 135818 AWARDS&TROPHIES $434.66 PLAGUES 135819 BAILEY CONTROLS COMPANY $1,086.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135820 BANANA BLUEPRINT $7,077.42 PRINTING M.0.10-10.90 135821 BANK OF THE WEST $2,962.04 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION J-23-2 135622 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $928.85 BATTERIES 135823 BAUER COMPRESSOR $957.74 COMPRESSOR PARTS 135824 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3,516.34 LAB SUPPLIES 135825 DON C.BEATTIE P.E. $2,800.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 135826 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $856.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135827 BELL SECURITY $1,868d3 SECURITY SERVICES 136828 BIOMERIEU%VITEK,INC. $4,750.57 LAB SUPPLIES 135829 BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS,INC. $110.43 LAB SUPPLIES 135830 BLACK&VEATCH $25,807.11 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146 135831 BOERINGER MANNHEIM $358.63 LAB SUPPLIES 135832 BONA-RUES $370.08 TRUCK PARTS 135833 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $38,927.52 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18,7-19 135834 BRADY USA,INC. $86.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135835 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $228.73 ELECTRIC PARTS 135836 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $110.46 PUBLICATION 135837 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $1.768.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.&10-92 135838 BUYCHEM DISTRIBUTORS $265.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2116194 PAGE02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 2/23194 POSTING DATE 2J23194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135839 CEPA $250.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135840 CS COMPANY $2.408.10 VALVES 135841 CALTROL,INC. $1.934.82 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135842 CARLETON ENGINEERS $4,154.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 135843 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $69.495.57 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33,J-34 135844 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $15,788.40 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135845 CERFNET $17.10 COMPUTER SERVICES 135846 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING 54,810.23 PUMP 135647 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $67.51 LAB SUPPLIES 135848 COUCH&SONS $575,489.70 CONSTRUCTION 5.374 135949 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,386.23 PUMP PARTS 135850 COMPUTER DATACOM $147.49 COMPUTER HARDWARE 135651 COMPUSA,INC. 54,870.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135852 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $155.99 TRUCK PARTS 135853 CONNER PERIPHERALS,INC. $510.60 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS 135854 CONSOLB)ATED ELECTRICAL DIST $11,082.07 ELECTRIC PARTS 135855 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $530.00 TOOLS TTI 135856 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $10.300.41 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.7-17-91 X 135857 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $2.440.31 CENTRAL GEN.ENGINE PARTS = 135858 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $1,223.27 TRUCK PARTS pd 135859 COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT $21.150.00 CONNECTION FEE REFUND 135860 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $214.45 ELECTRIC PARTS 135861 DAILY PILOT $66.00 NOTICES&ADS py 135862 DARTEK COMPUTER SUPPLY $122.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 135863 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $3,100.95 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-11-93 1V 135864 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $753.71 PRINTING 135865 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $4.98&31 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 135666 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $1,397.39 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL M.O.1-13-92 135867 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $8,242.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE&REPAIRS 135868 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $76.562.53 CONSTRUCTION P1 45.1 135869 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $6,40O.00 MEDICAL INSURANCE CONSULTANT 135870 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $2,066.86 PAINT SUPPLIES 135871 ESP NORTH $127.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 135872 EASTMAN,INC. $6.466.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135873 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $11.95 LAB SUPPLIES 135874 ENCHANTER,INC. $3.360.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 135875 MARSHALL FAIRRES $78.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 135876 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $357.50 AIR FREIGHT 135877 FERRELLGAS $120.49 PROPANE 135878 CHEMWEST,INC. $2,120.00 FIBERGLASS 135879 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $1,367.14 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 135880 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $144.81 LAB SUPPLIES 135881 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $37.47 LAB SUPPLIES 135882 CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $15,606.25 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.5-10.92 135883 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 5228.47 PHOTO SUPPLIES 135884 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $9,061.94 BUILDING PERMIT FEES J-234 FUND NO 9199 - JT'DIST WGRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 2/16/94 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 2F23194 POSTING DATE 2J23/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135805 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $2.11 PAINT SUPPLIES 135886 FREY ENVIRONMENTAL,INC. 5555.65 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 135887 FURON DEKORON $95.00 CABLE 135888 GST,INC. 31,210,05 COMPUTER PARTS 135889 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $747.33 LUMBER/HARDWARE 135890 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $108.12 CHEMICALS 135891 GEAR TECH $4,000.00 MACHINE INSPECTION 135892 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $335.14 ELECTRIC PARTS 135893 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4,273.95 TELEPHONE SERVICES 135894 GEORGE LEECH&ASSOCIATES $75.23 FLOWMETERS 135895 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $8,741.60 MECHANICAL PARTS 135895 W W GRAINGER,INC. $354.82 ELECTRIC PARTS 135897 GRASEBY ANDERSON $4,283.01 LAB SUPPLIES 135898 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $1,355.61 PRINTING 135899 DGA CONSULTANTS $1,885.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 135900 HBO TECHNOLOGY $114.519.83 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2 135901 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $12.93 PRINTING 135902 HACH COMPANY $191.70 CHEMICALS X 135903 FRED A.HARPER $1,600.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION = 135904 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $543.77 PLUMBING SUPPLIES i--i 135906 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $588.42 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 135905 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1.925.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 135907 PL HAWN CO,INC. $136.39 FILTERS 135908 HELLO $39.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES I� 135909 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,0$3.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. W 135910 HEWLETT PACKARD $400.00 OFFICE MACHINE 135911 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $292.67 MECHANICAL PARTS 135912 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $59.040.91 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1d4 136913 HOME DEPOT $1,045.71 HARDWARE 136914 HOOKER'S REPAIR SERVICE $55.00 LAB EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 135915 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,677.17 PAINT SUPPLIES 135916 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $25.08 WATER USE 136917 IDEXX $403.95 LAB SUPPLIES 135918 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $16,288.13 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18.92 135919 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $663.75 CONNECTORS 135920 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $573.82 BATTERIES 135921 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $34.66 WATER USE 135922 ISCO $1.842.53 LAB EQUIPMENT 135923 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1.025.82 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 135924 JAVID CONTRACTORS,INC. $67.912.65 CONSTRUCTION P2-23-5-1 135925 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $75.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 135926 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,005.2B ELECTRIC PARTS 135927 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $1,966.94 CHEMICALS 135928 THE KEITH COMPANIES $2,637.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-36R 135929 KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP. $192,82 FREIGHT 135930 KING BEARING,INC. $3.191.91 MACHINE SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16M PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 223194 POSTING DATE 2/2354 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136931 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $3.623.83 HARDWARE 135932 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $571.64 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 135933 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $375.52 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135934 LEWCO ELECTRIC S263.07 TRUCK PARTS 135935 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $3,030.21 DEFERRED COMP TRUSTEE 135936 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. S7,600.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIRONMENTAL 135937 MPS $474.04 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 135938 MACOMCO $520.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135939 MSA $700.97 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135940 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $664,188.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 135941 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $120.79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135942 MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS.,INC. S4,136.59 METERS 135943 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES $1.848.56 ELECTRIC PARTS 135944 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $4,617.13 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 135945 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRIES. $153.40 FITTINGS 135945 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $203.14 MECHANICAL PARTS 135947 MISSION INDUSTRIES S3,683.32 UNIFORM RENTALS 135948 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $70.00 ELECTRIC PARTS m 135949 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. $998.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS X 135950 NASCO WEST,INC. S299.59 LAB SUPPLIES 2 135951 NATIONAL FILTER MEDIAVICESCORP. $2,432.50 VACUUM AUCK TS SE � 1J5952 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $2,132.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 135953 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY $218.09 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 135954 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $817.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES W 135955 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $629.36 COMPRESSOR PARTS r 135957 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE .437.40 PUBLICATION 135958 ORACLE CORP.RPO $8,437.40 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 135959 ORACLE CORPORATION $2,100.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 135959 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $228.97 TRUCK PARTS 135960 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $202.03 INSTRUMENTSUPPUES 135961 ORANGE COURIER $133.50 COURIER SERVICES 135262 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. S7,92&28 FITTINGS 135983 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,745.83 SPECIALTYGASES 135964 PC SYSTEMS DESIGN $138.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135965 P&S FILTRATION,INC. $2,903.18 MECHANICAL PARTS 135966 PACIFIC PARTS $809.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135967 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $6,492.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135988 PACIFIC BELL $154.83 TELEPHONE SERVICES 135969 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $188.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 135970 PADGETT-THOMPSON 5395.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 135971 PAGENET S2,054.24 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 135972 PASCAL&LUDWIG ENGINEERS $13,241.70 CONSTRUCTION J32 135973 PASCAL&LUDWIG.INC. $128,600.60 CONSTRUCTION P7-38-2 135974 PASCAL AND LUDWIG $173,150.00 CONSTRUCTION P243-1 - 135975 PASCAL&LUDWIG $27,810.00 CONSTRUCTION P7<2 135976 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $274.69 LAB SUPPLIES q FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16194 PAGE 05 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 223/94 POSTING DATE 2J23/90 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135977 PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS,INC. $18.129.56 CHEMICALS 135978 PICKWICK PAPER $306.02 STORAGE BOXES 135979 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $127,937.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 135980 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $163.60 PLASTIC BOTTLES 135981 POLY ENTERPRISES,INC. $301.70 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135982 POLYPURE,INC. $18,198.90 GITIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 135983 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5,000.00 POSTAGE 135984 POWER DESIGN $20.364.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135985 POWER PUMPS,INC. $196.38 PUMP PARTS 135986 POWER TRACK,INC. $169.69 PUMP PARTS 135987 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $62.00 ICE 135988 AQUACHEM,INC. $12,714.50 BOILER 135989 QUEST MEDIA B SUPPLIES $957.70 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135990 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. $13,641.W CMMS STAFF TRAINING M.0.8-12-92 135991 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $374.97 ELECTRIC MOTORS 135992 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1,682.71 TRASH REMOVAL 135993 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $2.096.77 LAB SUPPLIES m 1359M DR.SHIVAJI RAMALINGAM $1,522.50 LAB SUPPLIES 135995 RED VALVE CO.,INC. $1,312.67 VALVES = 1359% DRESCHER BANK WEINHEIM $277.56 PUBLICATIONS 135997 RED WING SHOES $207.74 SAFETY SHOES ' 135998 BOLT DELIVERY $35.44 FREIGHT -1 135999 THE REGISTER $1,087.09 NOTICES 8 ADS 136000 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $5.036.97 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136001 RICH COLOR LAB $51.18 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES Vl 136002 RYAN-HERCO $1,504.33 PUMP PARTS 136003 JOSEPH T.RYERSON 8 SON,INC. $636.94 TUBING 136004 SKC WEST $1,334X8 SAFETY SUPPLIES 136005 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $830.89 ELECTRIC PARTS 136006 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $269.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 13WO7 DOUG SARVIS $750.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 136008 SCHWING AMERICA $3,009.78 PUMP PARTS 136009 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $999.92 SPECIALTY GASES 136010 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $992.00 LAB REPAIRS 136011 LUDECA,INC. $1,140.57 MECHANICAL PARTS 136012 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $11&31 TOOLS 136013 SHURELUCK SALES $9,801.03 TOOLSHARDWARE 136014 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION $253.34 LAB SUPPLIES 136015 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $179.83 LAB SUPPLIES 135016 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1.583.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 136017 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $92.03 TOOLS 136018 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $5,376.25 PERMIT FEES 136019 SOUTH COAST WATER $466.49 SERVICE AGREEMENT 13602D SO CALIF.EDISON C.O. $39.574.11 POWER 136021 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $363AST33 NATURAL GAS 136022 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $9,388.45 DIESEUUNLEADED FUEL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16M4 PAGE O6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 2123194 POSTING DATE 2/23M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 138023 SOUVENIR PHOTO $57.61 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 136024 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,347.46 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 136026 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $1,393.94 METER 136028 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $6,100.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 136027 WESTALLOY,INC. $415.58 WELDING SUPPLIES 136028 SPECTRUM CHEMICAL $104.18 LAB SUPPLIES 136029 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCE SYSTEM $5,186.25 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136030 SRECO FLEXIBLE $2,319,14 TRUCK PARTS 136031 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS $950.00 LAB EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 135032 STRATAGENE $215.73 LAB SUPPLIES 136033 GARY G.STREED $3,955.76 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 136034 SUMMIT STEEL $7,281.54 METAL 136035 SUNSETFORD $117.05 TRUCK PARTS 136036 SUPER CHEM CORP. $684.26 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 136037 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $155.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 136038 TARBY ENGINEERING $3,848.00 PUMP PARTS 136039 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $1,255.71 ELECTRIC CART PARTS m 136D40 TERRYS CAMERA $625.67 CAMERA EQUIPMENT X 136041 TEXTILE ENGINEERING ASSOC. $3,176.00 MECHANICAL PARTS s 136D42 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $409.44 MECHANICAL PARTS Od 136043 TILE MATTERS $154.64 PAINT SUPPLIES b 136044 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE E506.42 LOCKS 8 KEYS 136045 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $912.00 TRAVEL SERVICES DO 136046 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $1,235.16 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136047 TUSTIN DODGE $300.15 TRUCK PARTS 135048 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $451.00 LAB SUPPLIES 136D49 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $260.49 PARCEL SERVICES 136050 UNITED SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $134.82 LAB SUPPLIES 136051 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2.548.07 LAB SUPPLIES 136052 VALIN CORPORATION 3525.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 136053 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $711.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136054 VARIAN ASSOCIATES,INC. $639.27 LAB SUPPLIES 136055 WATER ENVIRONMENTAL FED. $2,271.15 PUBLICATION 136055 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $10,525R6 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.&12-92 136057 WESCO $840.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136058 B.L.WILCOX&ASSOC. $123.38 PUMP PARTS 136059 WITEG $411.61 LAB SUPPLIES 136060 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $64,642.76 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 136061 XEROX CORP. $2,890.94 COPIER LEASES 136062 EVERETT H.YORK CO. $1.001.32 CENTRAL GENERATION PARTS 136063 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 02/23/94 $3,504.904.25 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE V16194 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 2123194 POSTING DATE 223/90 SUMMARY AMOUNT #2 OPER FUND $2.624.03 02 CAP FAC FUND 108.05 #3 OPER FUND 14,083.79 #3 CAP FAC FUND 2.675.42 #5 OPER FUND 714.54 06 CAP FAC FUND 21.475.30 97 OPER FUND 3.362.19 #7 CAP FAC FUND 38,977.87 911 OPER FUND 6.314.35 011 CAP FAC FUND 1,766.00 014 OPER FUND 112.00 014 CAP FAC FUND 420.04 #167 OPER FUND 320.10 #566 OPER FUND 1.367.24 #5&6 CAP FAC FUND 677,374.70 m #6&7 OPER FUND 2,103.18 X 07&14OPERFUND 290.18 2 JT CORPER FUND 846,590.14 58 R 1,825.813.41 .� SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 52,171.1 � JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 152,17146 V E3.504,904.25 1 �J COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1OBA4 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIRO9N1092728-8127 01418822111 April 13, 1994 STAFF REPORT: METHANE AND HYDROGEN SULFIDE PROBLEMS IN PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to advise the District Nos. 5, 6 and City of Newport Beach Directors of a gas intrusion incident that affected the portion of our 27-inch Pacific Coast Gravity_Sewer running in Pacific Coast Highway between Newport Boulevard and Superior Avenue from March 29 until April 9. Approximately 2500 feet of this 50-year- old sewer line located in the City of Newport Beach was influenced by the naturally occurring "swamp" gas seeps that are present in this area. Hydrogen sulfide produced worse than "normal' odor problems in the area and methane gas concentrations reached potentially explosive levels within the sewer and the manhole shafts that serve it. Happily, we can report that conditions within the sewer are now safe because of investigative action taken by one of our Source Control staff, corrective measures taken by our Maintenance and Engineering staff and the support and cooperation we received from staff of the City of Newport Beach and of Hoag Hospital. Our costs to respond to the problem and to take corrective action are estimated to be in the neighborhood of $50,000. During the incident, staff briefed District No. 5 Chairman Cox. For the Directors' information attached are: a portion of a staff report done by Kevin Murphy, City Manager of Newport Beach, to his city council and an article that appeared in the Daily Pilot. WHAT HAPPENED On the morning of March 29, one of the Districts' Source Control inspectors was conducting gas sampling in the vicinity of our Bitter Point Pump Station (near Cappy's Restaurant) which is located on Pacific Coast Highway and adjacent to the Newport Beach Oil Field. The City of Newport Beach operates oil wells under Districts' permit number 5-1-003. The inspector was doing routine testing that is part of a Districts-wide effort to determine if hydrocarbon vapors, which may be present in treated petroleum wastewater from the oil fields throughout the county, are at high enough levels to warrant control and regulation under the provisions of the Districts' sewer use ordinance. Testing found that elevated concentrations of hydrocarbon vapors from the treated oil field discharge were present and that potentially explosive levels were of immediate concern. The City of Newport Beach was notified and took appropriate corrective action by halting oil production to stop their discharge to the sewer system. (We might add, as 1 i a side note, that as a result of this experience, the Districts' Source Control Division is redoubling its monitoring efforts in the vicinity of oil production fields within our service area to determine if other previously undetected problems exist). Unfortunately, we discovered that while the action by the City significantly reduced much of the problem at our Bitter Point Pump Station, it did not eliminate all of it. Elevated concentrations of potentially explosive gases persisted in some portions of the gravity sewerFs that flow into the station. This was particularly true approximately 4000 feet upstdeam of the original test site. This observation, combined with other testing, led us to the conclusion that a gas source of unknown origin was leaking into the sewer in the reach between Newport Boulevard and Superior Avenue. The area of highest concentration encountered was the manhole in front of the Royal Thai Restaurant. Monitoring was continued on March 30 by our Source Control inspectors and meetings were initiated between representatives of Newport Beach and the Districts. During his investigation of the incident on the second day, our inspector noticed the ongoing work of a consulting geologist on the Hoag Hospital property next to Pacific Coast Highway and across the street from the restaurant. He discovered that the geologist was also measuring hydrogen sulfide and methane concentrations in the gas extraction system that has 'een operated by Hoag Hospital for nearly 20 years (and operated by the City for approximately 10 years previous to that). It soon became apparent that the "gas sands" that are an old problem in this vicinity were contributing hydrogen sulfide (principally an odorlproblem in this situation) and methane gas (principally an explosion problem if of SUM ient concentration) to the Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer which serves the City f Newport Beach and is owned and operated by District Nos. 5 and 6. Two emergency meetings between the City and the Districts occurred during the evening of March 30. As a result of these meetings, an initial response plan was developed between the Districts and the City. The Districts began to force-ventilate the sewer at two locations. The City provided initial traffic control in the vicinity of the work and began to test its storm drains and local sewers. From the evening of March 30 until Saturday, April 9, various Districts' staff were on site 24-hours-per-day. Our activities increased or decreased during those 10 days depending upon the conditions that were encountered and what our frequently shifting game plan demanded. The various activities that our staff undertook included regular communication with the City, testing of the gases within our sewer system, operating the ventilation equipment, installing a vent stack in front of the Royal Thai Restaurant, cleaning the line to prepare it for a television inspection, videotaping it from Newport Boulevard to Superior Avenue, and finally, directing a contractor to repair and modify the manhole in front of the restaurant. We are convinced that the primary cause of the incident was the gas sands underlying Pacific Coast Highway in the area bordered roughly by the Hoag Hospital bluffs to the north, Newport Boulevard to the east, Balboa Coves to the south and Superior Avenue to west. 2 =Y: Initially we surmised that the secondary cause of the incident was the fractured condition of the Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer which allowed the gases to easily enter the line. It is over 50 years old and a replacement sewer is currently under design. Manufactured from vitrified clay (a material still in wide use today because of its outstanding corrosion resistance and its relatively low cost), this 27-inch line has simply outlived its useful life and is scheduled fdr replacement during 1994-95 as part of the District Nos. 5 and 6 collection system improvements that have been underway for several years. We inspected the sewer using a remote control video camera on April 7th and concluded that the 1994 conditions were not far different than those of 1990 when it was first videotaped. But if this was true, why were we now facing such elevated concentrations? Our Assistant Director of Maintenance surmised that perhaps the gas was not leaking primarily into the sewer line itself, but, instead, was entering through the manhole in front of the restaurant where the highest concentrations of gases had been encountered. Careful testing of the manhole shaft seemed to indicate that particularly elevated concentrations of gas were found where sections of the manhole "chimney" fit together. Using this theory as a starting point, the Districts' Engineering Department secured the services of a company that could clean, rehabilitate and seal the interior surfaces of the manhole shaft. They also sealed off the annular space between the 27-inch sewer pipe entering the manhole and its associated 24-inch fiberglass liner sleeve (installed some 20 years ago as a corrective measure) to preclude the possibility that gas was channeling through this annular space and into the manhole shaft. This work was completed in the early morning hours of Friday, April 8. The emergency repairs to the manhole shaft did the trick. Hydrogen sulfide and methane concentrations dropped to insignificant levels. On the morning of April 9, after 24 hours of successful operation, our crews were sent home. Testing since then has indicated that the Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer is operating normally and that gas concentrations are no longer a problem. We will continue to monitor the situation on an increasingly less frequent basis as we develop confidence that our temporary corrective measures are sufficient to control the gases to acceptable levels within the Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer and the manholes that serve it. Cost for all of this work has yet to be fully accounted. However, we do have a reasonable estimate. There were approximately 1400 staff hours devoted to the activities listed above. The contractor cost to repair the manhole in front of the Thai Restaurant was just under $4,000. All told, we expect the total costs to District Nos. 5 and 6 to be approximately $50,000. One question remains unanswered. What were the prevailing gas concentrations in the Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer previous to March 29, 1994? We may never know because we do not, as a matter of routine, measure gas concentrations throughout our trunkline system. Under normal conditions there is no reason to do so and the staffing demand, given the hundreds of miles of our system, would be too great. For this reason, we sample as the need arises. Obviously, this stretch of sewer will be part of a routine monitoring program from here on out. 3 Even though we do not have historic baseline data, we can conclude that the concentrations were probably elevated in the past. Measurements of utility vaults, cracks in the sidewalks and other areas where gas accumulates in the general area of the gas sands make it clear that positive readings have been a long-term reality. Assuming that the physical condition of the Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer has remained fairly constant for the last few years, it is quite likely that the concentrations we recently measured were present from time-to-time in the past. Factors such as tidal conditions, the extraction rate of the Hoag gas flare system, the new pavement on Pacific Coast Highway and barometric pressure all have some degree of influence on the amount of gas present at any time. WHAT'S NEXT There are two issues that must be addressed: What to do about the scheduled sewer replacement work and what to do about the gas sand. First the sewer. The Districts and City staff are completing their discussions about the planned replacement of this last stretch of the Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer from Newport Boulevard to Bitter Point Pump Station. Work will likely be completed during this coming fiscal year. At one point we had discussed the idea of accelerating the construction schedule, but that now appears to be unnecessary, because the immediate problem appears to be under control. To meet the City's and Cal Trans requirements, the job will probably be bid in the fall with construction beginning in the winter. As far as the design of the sewer is concerned, now that we understand how extensive the gas sand problem has been and can be, the Districts will direct Boyle Engineers, the consulting engineering firm responsible for designing this reach, to take into account the adverse conditions under which the sewer must be constructed and operated. Incidentally, if this weren't enough, we know that there are gasoline problems at PCH and Superior Boulevard which we must also face when construction of the replacement sewer enters this stretch of the job. With regard to the gas sands, Districts' staff believes that this is not our issue. Any short- or long-term abatement strategies will have to be worked out among the various affected parties. As for the Districts' interests, it appears that as long as we design for the occurrence of the gas sands, we can safely and reliably construct and operate the replacement sewer. Staff will report to the District Nos. 5 and 6 Boards of Directors as additional information develops. Districts' staff will continue to work cooperatively with the City staff as we have during this emergency and in the past. BPA:ahh REF #410035.RP Attachment 4 RVY OI•VJVVV ICVn Jtn.. • Y II O• • V•Jr vYY JLLr ' r April 8, 1994 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Kevin J. Murphy, City Manager SUBJECT. CITY MANAGER'S NEWSLETTER 1 . non Undels Over the last week we have continued the quest with the County Sanitation District staff to try and determine the root (no pun Intended) cause of the higher levels of hydrogen sulfide gasses and LEL's (or lower explosive levels) of methane In the trunk sewer line along west PCH. Fortunately due to venting at the key manhole, which is right in front of the Royal Thal restaurant, the i.EL's are under control. However, we continue through various tests to try to find the cause of the problem. It appears now that It is = our oil operation, the Hoag flare, or a major leak in the line. After extensive tests of the sewage Itself, the gasses and videotaping the line. It appears that there Is an opening In the area between the liner (Installed In the pipe some years ago) and the old clay pipe Itself near the manhole by the Royal Thal restaurant. More then like!y though the problem is simply Mother Nature and the naturally occurring passes In the area. Today there will be an operation to try and seat this leak which Is hoped will keep the gasses out of the sewer line and allow the gas flare at Hoag to pull the gasses more efficiently and burn them off. Fortunately, there are no signs of gasses In Balboa Coves In our sewer lines or In the storm drain system. The County staff is looking now at proceeding to replace this 52 year old line starting In September 1994. I'll keep you posted with any other developments. 2. Budget Issues As you know, Monday we'll be discussing this Issue In some depth and I'm sure given the press attention now that It will bring out quite a few Individuals with various agendas. I think people may now realize that there Is a serious problem with our finances that the State has largely caused, combined with the economy, but I'm not sure we'll hear a lot of constructive Ideas about how to cure the problem other than trying to protect a particular special Interest or put a spin on issues. Related to the budget Is our landfill tipping fee and I'm pleased to lot you know that the attached letter that Phil Sansone spearheaded has resulted in the County staff pulling back on the $5 Increase In the tipping fse effective July 1st, until further study can be completed. Finally, and related to the budget, i thought I'd attach a copy of Merger pram which Is affectionately known as the newsletter on the merger of two departments into Community Services. As an outcropping of the merger, the three boards that work with Community Services met yesterday jointly to talk nvv at•Wi,v'v icvn aCM1y. r ♦-. ->. u .�y , ., p„y a.a.,^ ,� Crew tries GAS From Page Al to phut off rate system of wells and pipes which tunnel the gas to a tordh located qn Hoag Hospital property, The flare dangerous burro the gas off. Murphy sold, the torch works properly as long as the gas gets to It. "If the gas gap leak escapes, the n.- L,1 Dos, Haag (ins, : recglvod. city and' slefd,,a al,do ex- 5 Officials will continue to monitor pond Dote' a 'gaFladen soil, levels of hydrogen sulfide and Hospital officials Bar the new buildings will be methane gas to see B permanent equipped with several safety ventilation system IS needed. devices to keep the gas out of the new facilities. If the By Davim Hasa,sio;w'.mr, gas does get inside, alarms will alert officials to evacu. NEWPORT DLACH — Sanitation ale• crews tightened a seal on Priday that ppn- Eventually, the gas will be vclopcs underground sewage pipes along funneled to a power plant at Coast Highway, where dangerous amInts Hoag and turned into en- of hydrogen sulfide and methane ges, eve ergy. Murphy said. been detected "We're going to seal It,put on the men= hole Paver end sot whet happen% , rChy Manager Kevin Murphy said. 'If we get continued high readingc we will have to sreYlk►'yeot ih the public right-of-way." Lest week, county officials found explo. slvo;Jpvels of the gas inslde,,the pipes, Slnowilumn officials have been ventilating and cleanin. the ducts while trying to do- le�pIq•pe.where the gar Is coming from. ;p „. u By. extent" tofling by the i '�ITp" �anitallon distr extent"five2 some- thlldly officials already knew - that 1 fs forming nsturally. ly crews also snpktd a,vi000'oem- ef t the piping to look3or tracks. Murphyy said they didn't spot any signifi. cant frecluros, surprising oft als who lho?gghl that could be how the gas Is Set. Iing in. Crows Iowa been settling the pipes since last week. By placing a smokestack In s manhole cover — which Is located outside the Royal Thai restaurant — 'the gas an escape. If it permanent ventilation system has to be installed, Murphy said the county will dcslgp It in a way that doesn't Interfere with the restaurant's business. "We won't have a pipe sticking out of the middle of the street,' he said. None of the gas has filtered into the eny's storm drain system,Murphy said. In the 1970s, the city Installed an elabo- fee OAfRage Ate REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN 4-13-94 1 ) Possible Presentation of Plaaue(s) and Resolution(c1 to Retiring Directors See attached (pink) report and listing from last month. Rob Richardson Last month Rob Richardson indicated that he might attend this month. 2) Upcoming Meetings A. Fiscal Policy Committee - The Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, April 20thrat 5:30 p.m. B. Personnel Committee - The Personnel Committee is scheduled to meet on Thursday. April 21st, at 5-30 p.m. -Item 2 Continued on Next Page - C. Executive CommittPP - The Executive Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, April ffi. at 5:30 p.m. Invite two of the following Directors to attend and participate in the discussions: Burnie Dunlap and Norman Eckenrode -or- James M. Ferryman, or James H. Flora D. Special Joint Works Selection Committee Re Computers - The Special Joint Works Selection Committee Re Computers is scheduled to meet on Thursday. April 28th, at 5:30 p.m. E. Executive Subcommittee - The Executive Subcommittee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 1 1 th, at 5:30 p.m. - End of Report - Attachment w pdoc\g m\jcrpts\j c0494 REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN 3-9-94 1 ) Presentation of Plaques and Resolutions to Retiring Directors. As you know, several of our directors recently retired from the Boards and we would like to acknowledge their efforts on behalf of the Districts' with the presentation of a plaque and a resolution expressing the Boards' appreciation for their outstanding service. Over the years, these directors have not only performed their duties as City Council or Sanitary District members with a high degree of professionalism and dedication, but they have also been equally involved in the wastewater management program of the Sanitation Districts. - Item 1 Continued on Next Page - Director's Name City District(s) Attending? -Bob Bell OTTa P8F' 2 Give to BBFFY es jaFnes Evans Midway City ayes Sanitary Gail Kerry Cypress 3 Eva Miner La Palma 3 Maria Moreno Placentia 2 Rob Richardson Santa Ana 1 NPJ ,u�^d( ? jirmTSilva Hunting-ton Bch 3 Yes Hank Wedaa Yorba Linda 2 ! April 13, 1994 MEETING DATE p TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7, I i, 13 S 14 DISTRICT I JOINT BOARDS IBEYERI . ... ... ..... BARAERA ..... .. . . IBEYERI . . . . . . . . ... ...MARE .......... _ RUM ........... .. MC OUIOAN ....... T IFORSY EI . .. ... .....BROWN . .......... IREADEI ........ .... FERRYMAN . ....... INORBYI ...... ... .....CATLIN............ IPONTIOUSI ........ . SALTARELLI..... . .. ISCOTTI ...... ........COLLINS ... ........ _ LISTENER) .......... . STANTON ....... . . .ae IDESAYI . .............COX ... . .......... — ISANSONEI .......... ..DEMY ............ _ DISTRICT 2 (BELLI . . . .............GENES ............ ISCOTTI ............ COLLINS ........ . . INELSONI ... ...... ....DUNLAP .. ......... IDALYI . ... ... ... ... PICKLER .......... IMADID ...L... . ......ECKENRAN ........ IBEYERI . ...... ..... MRREM . ........ �� IREADEI ..............FERRYMAN ......... WORBY) .... ... ..... DATLIN ........... IMAHONE.. ...........FLOM . ........... IMAE .. MILM ...... GENES . . ........ IBONEI ...............GULUXUFFIN ......... _ IFLOM) ..... I ..... EIXENROD! ..... . . MC ..... .........HAMMOND SON ........ MARKER) ............ MAHONEY ......... MARC)AI ...... ........HART . . . ......... (LUTZ)RI . .......... NELSON ......... ICOU . ... ............MART . . ........... _ R.UTTI .......... . .. STUNG .......... . IMMm ..P. TTERSONJ........ '.. LEIPZIO INN...... ........ (STEINERI . ... ... .... WELCHSTANTON ......... INCQU ..............LUT ... ........... ISINGERSON).. .. . .... WELCH .......... . IMCRA) ...I ..........MAH .. ........... ISINGERI .. ... ... .... 2LAKET ....... .. . . IFLOMI ... ...........MA HONEY ....... .. ILURI . ........... ...MC ........ DISTRICT 3 IPULm01 ..............MORENO ENO .......... _— IESTRADAI ......... . SAMN .. ......... RIOBITAILLE) ... ... .....MOULTON-PATTEMON INELSONI ........... DUNLAP . ......... IPARKERI .............NELSON ........... _ IFORSVTHEI ... ...... BROWN INICHOLI ............. ........... �+ WORBYI ........ . ... CATLIN . ......... . :DAtY1LSOM ..........PANTIE....:.......J� _ ISCOTTI .. ....... . COLLINS ........ . . IDALYI . ..............PICKLER . . ....... .Q( IMAHONEY) ......... FLORA (PoIXETTI .........PoNTIOUB .......:: . •• ••.... .. ISALTARELLB ......... .PUCKETT ........ IBONEI .... ...... .. . GRIFFIN ... ...... .. _ IMINERI . ...... ..... LINE .. ..... J[ ILURI ...............PULIDO.............ae (MC OUIGANI ........ LUTZ. . ...... ... . . IEVANS) ..............RICE .... ..........� — IROBRAIIIEI ......... MOULTON PATFERBON IPoNTIOUSI .......... .MLTARELLI ........JG _ (NICHOLSON) ........ PARTIN . .. ........ IDEBAYI . .............MNSONE ..........Je — MALYI ............. PICKLER ..... . .. . . . IESTRADAI ............SANEN. ............0 IEVANSI ............ RICE ..... . .. ... .. RLAKETI .... ... ......SIIINIL............ — RLAKETI .......... . SYISBR . . . . . . ... .. STEINER) .... .........STANTON ..........� (STEINER) ....... ... . STANTON ..... ... . (STANTON) ............STEINER ........... — ISElVA0011 ...... .... SVLVIA . ... . . . .. . . (MILLERI ........... ...SWAN ............ — ISELVAGGI)........ SYLVIA............ — DISTRICT 6 .. IPERRY/SCHEAFERI .... ..WANNER .......... — IOEBAY) ........... . CO% .. . . .. ....... IDULLI%SONI ...........WELCH . ........... — IDEBAYI ........... . SANSONE ........ IROSITAILLE) ...........WINCHELL .........� (STANTON) ......... . STEINER ....... JI (SINGER) ... ...........2LAKET ......... STAFFOTHERS IDPERRRIICT . ......... WAMNER . . ........ ,1/ SYLVESTER.. WOODRUFF J� MOM . .......... MAY . . . ..... J[ BROWN . ... ANWAR . ... .. . .. . — ANDER DEMI ISTANTONI . ...... . .. STEINER .. ....... J[ CLAWS ON . . FLEMI . . ... _ — CLAWSON FLEMINO .. DISTRICT DAWES. ....Je NOHENER ... IWARDI HAMMOND ...... HASENSTAS HOUGH . . .. ISCHEAFER) ......... WANNER ........ HODGES ... .JG HOWARD ... IBEYERI ............ SAMERA ....... KYLE . . . ...1 HUNT . ..... ISANSONEI ..... ..... DEMY ... ........ MINDER . . ...JL ME . ..... NINDER .... LEE F _ IPULID01 . . ..... . .... MOREL- ... ....... NICHOLS.... LINDSTROM . ISALTARELLII ........ PUCKETT .......... — ISTANTONI .. ...... .. STEINER .. . ....... .SO 00TEN ""-se LYNCH MAW "". SIMMON DISTRICT 11 STREED . . .. STONE . .... WASON IROBITAILLEI ......... WINCHELL .. .. .... : VINSOR .... YOUNG .... _ IMOULTON-PATTERSONI LEI .... ...... WINSOR ...1.� .�j YOUNG . . . . (STEINER) ........... STANTON ..... ... ,Or4�. ?I AES/ DISTRICT 13 V�-i`r�•L_e•'+`tlft�ptoP IWELCHI . . .. . ... .... GULUXSON ....... . IBEYERI ... ... .... BARRERA . ....... . �R^V•�JJ��!��eF� A.'lr`Y /�IBEYER) .... ... ....40 ........ (� IDALYI . . . .......... RCKLER ......... ISTANTONI ......... . STEINER .......... DISTRICT 14 IMILLERI ........... . SWAN . .. ........ . — IPUCKETR ......... . PoNTIOUS ......... JG IBEYERI ........... . BARRERA .... ... ..L DuOi.b (WARD) ......... . HAMMOND ..... .., __ wlaoisa (STANTON) . ......... STEINER . ........ PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY April 13, 1994 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM Please Print Please Print Ut AaELE C CG ea2L sD 5;6 , 0� O 0 ecsy CS /elluI 1s- Cr s D "so 1" a /- N GR c 5 �1 e SGll 04/13/94 JOINT BOARD MEETING N61a1 - Joint Chairman's Report JC: As the results of some elections today, I will like to ask for a resolution of appreciation for our VJC Puckett and Director Leslie Pontious. We will hopefully make that presentation at the next meeting. Upcoming Meetings: Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, April 20th, at 5:30 p.m. The Personnel Committee is to meet Thursday, April 21st, at 5:30 p.m. The Executive Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, April 27th, at 5:30 p.m. I would like to ask Burnie Dunlap and Norman Eckenrode to be there. The Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers is to meet Thursday, April 28th, at 5:30 p.m. The Executive Subcommittee is to meet on Wednesday, May 11th, at 5:30 p.m. Let me just ask is Rob Richardson present here tonight? That will conclude the reports of the Joint Chairman. #6(b) - Report of the General Manager JWS: We are still trying to schedule a second new Directors Orientation and Treatment Plant Tour for those new Board members who weren't able to attend the first one. Of course, all Directors are certainly encouraged and invited to attend and we will notify you all when it has been scheduled. We haven't heard back from a few of the new Directors so we have put a note in your folder this evening if you don't mind filling that out and leaving it with the Secretary tonight and then we can go ahead with the planning. #61c1 - Reoort of the General Counsel TLW: Each of you have probably been receiving various bulletins from the League of Cities and and other groups relative to the state legislatures action n cs� -1- r on the most sensitive subject of all and that is tax shift or tax allocation. Just to give you a kind of heads up, we are watching that. CASA is very actively Involved, particularly in conjunction with other associations of the special districts mainly AQWA, the Association of California Water Agencies, the California Special Districts Association, the California Municipal Utilities Association. There is a bill pending that has been getting a great deal of attention. It has been reported and I am trusting that you are getting those on the status that has been put over for a couple of weeks for evaluation but it would be to authorize the tax revenues otherwise scheduled to be vested into the hands of the special districts to instead be put into the hands of the respective County Board of Supervisors and then be redistributed as they see, for either enterprise or non-enterprise districts. The source of this is in Santa Clara County. They did it last year, supposedly on a one time basis. Senator Mellow from that area sponsored it as a way of salvaging the local libraries and caused a transfer from the water and sanitary districts considerable sums of money into the public-run libraries. The bill is designed to make that applicable throughout the state. It is with considerable amount of resistance and the bill has run into some real serious problems. It is scheduled for a hearing again next week. All we can do is keep you posted. As the General Manager is in the midst of doing the budget and the Directors are certainly aware that this may have a significant impact on the fiscal situation for next year. Director Swan- -------------- amended his bills. ---------- apply only to libraries. He double joined that with another build up in Sacramento. ----------. TLW: That is accurate; at least that is what everybody is expecting. That is at least what he is representing that he will carry forward by the time it is set for hearing. As Director Swan said that is an improvement but it is not acceptable. #9e - Consent Calendar Director John Collins: I have no problem that the contractor should be paid on this item but I once again look at some of the concerns that I have with the engineering consultant. I would like to move the item with the provision that sub-item 3, 5 and 6 be noted and identified for presentation to the engineering consultant for consideration of compensation for errors and omissions in their work. That is #9(e) sub 1, items 3, 5 and I JC: Let us go with your motion to approve. Director Collins: I can clarify it if I may. I am talking about change order 9(e), change order no. 1, change order items 3, 5 and 6. -2- Director Norm Eckenrode: Have we had any problems with this contractor in the past? TMD: No Director Jan Debay: Could we hear from staff on if they think that this a reasonable thing? TMD: These items on the change order were items that were pointed out in the Manager's Report as errors and omissions. In the past we have always talked to our designers when we have this trouble and ask them to reimburse any extra cost that the Districts incurred. I believe that is what Director Collins wants and that is fine. #11 Director Peer Swan: I just would like to incorporate everyone ----- that I believe yesterday our floating rate debt set a new low. The interest rate was down to .91% which is a new record low for the Districts. It is up to 1 % today but that closer to ---- than if we did it with fixed. #30 - Rehabilitation of Cvoress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer. Contract No. 2-9-Rt TMD: This is a District No. 2 action and it is for approval of the plans and specifications for the Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer. This sewer was built about 33 years ago in the natural water course. Since that time development took place over the sewer and various spots, particularly on the west side of the 57 Freeway the sewer has suffered quite a bit of distress. We have 16 offset joints, 6 cracked pipes. Within Gillman Park on the east side of the 57 Freeway we have 29 offset joints. The recommended project begins at the Cal State Fullerton campus on the north side at Yorba Blvd. and Associated Road, Bastanchury Road and then within a private easement that we have secured for free from the Parkside Apartments and then in Gillman Park to Rolling Hills Drive. It will replace the old sewer with a larger sewer that is necessary to support quite a bit of new development that is taking place in Fullerton and Brea. The recommended action is to approve the plans and specifications. The estimate is $1.5 million for this project. Director Buck Catlin: Staff gave a very good presentation to the neighborhood up there. It was very timely and we appreciate it. -3- #31 - Claims of 245 Property Owners re Anaheim Hills Landslide TLW: We have included in the package a brief report concerning these claims. There are 245 claims that have been filed just in the past three weeks with the District. This is a case that originates with the rather well publicized landslide wherein some 45 homes in the Nohl Ranch area of east Anaheim slid off the foundations - some slid off, others were damaged. The city declared them uninhabitable. That occurred a year ago last January. There are 245 parcels that have already filed 15 lawsuits and the principal named parties are the City of Anaheim, the County of Orange, the Orange County Flood Control District. Additionally, they have named the Metrepelitan Water District of Orange County, as well as this District. The lawsuits go back a few months, the claims go back over six months ago, the plaintiffs have been dealing with the other entities relative to claims. This District had no official knowledge whatsoever that we were being considered to be included. On March 16th the Districts received in the mail 15 summons and complaints. We were asked to sign and receipt for them which has not been done. The following day someone walked in and served a claim on the District. There is procedural defects and we think that it is clearly defensible but the most important thing is the Sanitation Districts and this slide area are separated by a major ridgeline. The flow goes to the east on the slide, our line is 2.6 miles distant. We don't have anything anywhere close. I have met with the attorneys with one of the biggest law firms in the state representing them and gave them a real awakening and said that my board takes a very hard line, rigid position about frivolous claims and lawsuits. The first court appearance was this afternoon. I had someone there from my office; we didn't have to appear because we haven't been served. It was just a status conference. I have been given a promise that they will let me know by tomorrow whether they will drop us from the lawsuit formally. If not, this case has a huge potential of mega millions of dollars with 45 homes. That is clearly a high priced real estate area up in the Nohl Ranch area-huge homes, views, the whole story. It is very complex and if all of them file a lawsuit, it will be out of control in terms of cost. I am hopeful and optimistic that I have persuaded them that this is frivolous and we will immediately proceed on motions to get out and then seek to recover the Districts cost including fees because of a frivolous action. -4- It is brought for you tonight simply to allow us; I have been requested by all the other public agencies to effectively sign a stipulation stand-down agreement that we won't engage in any cross fire or cross complaints against each other. The County has made a request to me this morning, the City of Anaheim requested it yesterday afternoon and MET requested it this afternoon so I have indicated that we will do that because it is in our best interest not to get involved in the cross fire of claims. Hopefully, the next time I talk to you this will be in the category of history. #12 - Comments Prior to Closed Session TLW: The General Manager has requested that the Chair and the Directors authorize the addition of one new item to the agenda which has arisen subsequent to the posting of the agenda last week. This would be authorized pursuant to the Brown Act and specifically Government Code 54954.2. The purpose of it will be to consider a personnel issue re specifically the appointment of a public employee to a position and that is authorized under 54957 and that is a recommendation and it will be added and taken up in closed session. JC: Under the new act, we don't need to make specific statements; everything is listed in the agenda, however, I will defer to General Counsel and ask if anything further needs to be said. TLW: No, only if there are questions. The only items that will be discussed in the general session are the three items that are spelled out in and itemized on pages 7 and 8 of your printed agenda plus the item that you just added. Comments Re Closed Session TLW: The Directors in closed session discussed the four items, three of which were on the published agenda, fourth which was added. On item 1, the Boards will be considering momentarily item 12(d)• On item 2, the Board of Directors took no specific action. On item 3, any action that was taken by the Board will be reported at such time as the matter is concluded. On item 4, the Board of Directors took no action. JC: We will now entertain a motion for item #12(d)(1) Consideration of MOU's with employee organizations re salaries, benefits, etc. We have a motion and a second. Is there any discussion? Is there any opposition to the motion? We have one in opposition. Director Collins: The next category would be for abstains. I would like the record to show that specifically as an abstention to this item. -5- JC: The record will reflect an abstention, Director Collins and a vote of no for Director Gullixson and Director Rice will abstain. Show Dan Welch as a no. Other than that it stands approved. Thank you. Director Jan Debay: Before we adjourn, can I say something? I am a council member in Newport Beach and there is a supplemental item in your folder about a gas leak in the sewer line. I want to say that I have not seen a response like we got from the Sanitation Districts staff on this problem. It was serious. We have alot of sand gas ------ and we were getting a very high rate of hydrogen sulfide and other gases and the responses ------ and staff came down and met with us and we were able to find the problem -------- I just wanted to say thank you from Newport Beach. JC: I was aware of what was going on and it sounded like they were doing everything they could. -6- MVIa S . . I 4 'f—l�fQl, (CI w<J tpc a i i y- al Nil C-fec. i I - i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NIINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON APRIL 13, 1994 gµilTAT104V A 4 � `. - "Is gNGE COS' ADNIINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,2, 3,5,6. 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on April 13, 1994, at 7:30 p.m., In the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation the fag was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Noe. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: z Fred Berrers. Chairman Gene Beyer ;p x Pat McGuigan. Chairman pro tam Thomas E. Lph James M.Ferryman Nate Heads Thomas R. Saltereili Leslie Pontious y_ Rees,Stanton William G. Steiner ' DISTRICT NO.2: y_ John Collins, Cesarean George Scan _* Inv Fickler,Chairman pro tam Tom Del, s_ Fred Barrere Gen.Beyer a Bock Catlin Chris NorEy Berry Denes Bob Bell Norman 2.Eckenrede Michael Maerta yeller William D.Mahoney James H.Flora Caney J. Nelson Glenn Padar x _ Miguel Pulido Thomas E.Luts Roger Stanton William G. Steiner Daniel T.Welch John M.Guilizeon George L Valiant Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO.3: x Sal A. Sapien, Chairman William C. Estrada Burnie Dumap, Chairman pre tam Carney J.Nelson George Brown Gwen A. Forsythe x Buck Catlin Chris Norhy John Collins George Scott y_ James H.Flora William 0.Mahoney Don R.Griffin Donald Bona a_ Wally Linn Eva G.Miner Thomas E.Lutz Pat McGuigan Linde Moulton-leanerson Eader Rohitallle Richard Perin _ Joyce C.Nicholson a Iry Fickler _ Tom Daly Margie L.Rice James V.Evans _ Sheldon Singer George L. Baker Roger Stanton Wlliam G.Steiner Charles Sylvia Anthony Selvagid DISTRICT NO.S: . _ John C.Co..Jr.,Chairman Jan Other x Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tam Jan Date, William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.6: x James A.Warner, Chairman Ashur Perry y Evelyn Han,Chairman pro tam John C. Co.,Jr. Wiliam G. Stainer Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: Barry Hammond, Chairman Mike Ward James A.Warner, Chairman pro tam Mike Scheeler Fred Barrem Gene Beyer Jan Dehe, —_ Phil Samosa JL_ Ted Morena Miguel Pulido Charles E. Puckett Thomas R.Selterelli g_ Wiliam G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: . Geca Oil Chairman Earle Rahitaille y_ Victor Leipzig.Chairman pro tam _ Linda Moulton-Patterson i Roger Stanton William G.Stainer DISTRICT NO. 13: v John M. Believe.. Chairman Daniel T.Welch . Fred Banera,Chairman pro tam Gene Beyer Glenn Parker Burnie DUNap s Iry Fickler To.Daly William G.Steiner fears Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller •r Leslie Pontious, Chairman pro tam Charles E. Pucken L Fred Banera Gene Beyer Barry Hammond Mike Ward William 6.Steiner Roger Stanton —2— 04/13/94 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, A Emilio Ariston, Carl E. Beach, Catherine Biele, Glen Davidson, Roy English, John Finias, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Larry Lazorek, ` Howard Lembke, John Linder, Mike Moore, Robert Morris, Margie Nellor, Kent C. Nelson, Karl Nordgren, Bob Ooten, Phil Serrantino, Mary Simpson, Manny Stoffer, Jack Vincent, Chuck Winsor, Ray Young OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, David L. Hamilton, Chris Knap, Bill Knopf, Tom Nixon, Phil Stone ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that two of the Adoption of resolutions of appreciation Board members were retiring from the Board. for retiring Directors He then introduced resolutions expressing the Boards' appreciation to these Directors. It was moved, seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions expressing appreciation to the retiring Directors for their outstanding contributions and dedication to public service: Resolution No. Director City/Agency District 94-48 Charles E. Puckett Tustin 7 94-49 Leslie A. Pontious Tustin 14 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. Joint Chairman Mahoney added that plaques were being prepared and would be formally presented along with the resolutions to each of these Directors at a later date. m -3- 04/13/94 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the tentatively Report of the Joint Chairman scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, April 20th, at 5:30 p.m. ' Personnel Committee - Thursday, April 21 at, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, April 27th, at 5:30 p.m. (Directors Burnie Dunlap and Norman Eckenrode were also invited to attend.) Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers -Thursday, April 28th, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Subcommittee - Wednesday, May 11th, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that a second Report of the General Manager New Directors' Orientation and Treatment Plant Tour was being scheduled for those Directors who were unable to attend on March 19th, and requested those Directors who had not responded with regard to their attendance at the orientation and tour to complete the form that was placed in their folders that evening. When the orientation and tour is finalized, all Directors will be notified. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel, a Board Member on the Report of the General Counsel California Association of Sanitation Agencies, reported CASA is staying abreast of the state legislature's proposals to shift enterprise special districts' property taxes to other uses. CASA is also actively involved, particularly in conjunction with other associations of special districts such as the Association of California Water Agencies, California Special Districts' Association and the California Municipal Utilities Association, in efforts to defeat such legislation. Mr. Woodruff mentioned a bill that was pending and getting a great deal of attention with regard to authorizing the tax revenues otherwise scheduled to be vested into the hands of the special districts to instead be put into the hands of the respective County Board of Supervisors and then be redistributed to either enterprise or non-enterprise districts. Santa Clara County did this last year as a way of funding the local libraries and caused a transfer of tax monies from the water and sewer districts to the libraries. The bill is designed to make this applicable throughout the state. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 04/13/94 DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to ' Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered ' that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held March 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -5- 04/13/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of Payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 03/09/94 03/23/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $1,004,169.51 $647,458.36 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 204,626.28 2,019,293.41 Joint Working Capital Fund - 181,959.29 275,201.39 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 38,567.97 28,095.51 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 0.00 5,194.41 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 2,520.00 11,351.67 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 6,206.61 46,818.15 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 91,831.96 167,892.99 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 316.41 DISTRICT NO. 7 22,348.57 22,306.27 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 43,376.36 10,250.06 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO, 14 - 207.29 876.27 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 178,041.72 15,321.95 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 2,302.89 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT 99. 63.00 6,319.69 31 .783.818.56 33.258.999.43 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of 12.5% Sodium Hvpochlorite Solution, Specification That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt No. C-033. to Western States Chemical Resolution No. 94-36, receiving and filing bid Supply Corporation tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of 12.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Solution, Specification No. C-033, to Western States Chemical Supply Corporation, for the delivered price of $.3742 per gallon, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning May 14, 1994, with option for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -6- 04/13/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to C.S. Company for Purchase of That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Plug Valves (Specification No. E-242) a purchase order to C.S. Company in the amount of $53,613.00, plus sales tax and freight, for Purchase of Plug Valves (Specification No. E-242). ° ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Three 3/4 Ton Standard Size Pickup Trucks, That the bid tabulation and recommendation re Specification No. V-002, to Fuller Ford award of Purchase of Three 3/4 Ton Standard Size Pickup Trucks, Specification No. V-002, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Fuller Ford, for a total amount not to exceed $40,896.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System. Job No. J-28 (Rebid) Approving Change Order No. 2 to the Plans and specifications for Job No. J-28 (Rebid) Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28 (Rebidl, granting a time extension of 90 calendar days to the contract with Soffa Electric, Inc., for equipment installation delay under Districts' direction, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Job No. J-28 (Rebid) as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-37, accepting Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28 (Rebid), as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -7- 04/13/94 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2. Job No. J-32 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. J-32 Director Collins expressed concern that the engineering consultant be held responsible for certain changes. He then requested that the item be moved with the provision that Items 3, 5 and 6 in Change Order No. 1 be noted and identified for presentation to the engineering consultant for consideration of compensation for errors and omissions in their work. In response to Directors questions, the Director of Engineering explained that these particular items were pointed out in the Agenda Report as errors and omissions. He concluded that staff does talk to the design engineers when this type of problem occurs and asks for reimbursement of any extra cost the Districts may have incurred. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-32, authorizing a net deduction of $4,401.00 from the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for seven items of added or deleted work, granting a time extension of 75 calendar days for completion of said additional work and assessment of liquidated damages at $500 per day for 20 days for unauthorized delays, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Job No. J-32 as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-38, accepting Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-32, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -8- 04/13/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoorovina Chance Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and Nos. P1-36-1. P7-38-1. Pl-38-4 and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives P2-43-3 at Treatment Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-1; ° Security and Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-1; Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-38-4; and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-3, authorizing a deduction of $9,500.00 from the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc., Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. for deletion of contractor's "All Risk" insurance requirement to be covered under the Districts' master policy at a savings, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chanoe Order No. 2 to the Plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and No. P2-53-1 specifications for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1, authorizing an addition of $33,436.00 to the contract with Amelco Construction, a Division of Amelco Industries, for four items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. - ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, agreements for Surveying Services for authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate Various Collection System and Treatment agreements for Surveying Services for Various Plant Projects (Specification No. P-150) Collection System and Treatment Plant Projects (Specification No. P-150) to be constructed over the next three years, for future consideration by the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit Proposals and negotiate That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, agreements for Soils. Concrete and Other authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate Materials Testing Services for Various agreements for Soils, Concrete and Other Collection System and Treatment Plant Materials Testing Services for Various Collection Proiects (Specification No. P-151) System and Treatment Plant Projects (Specification No. P-151) to be constructed over the next three years, for future consideration by the Boards. -9- 04/13/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive. file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee and That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy Executive Committee Committee and Executive Committee meetings held on March 16, 1994 and March 23, 1994, respectively, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICTS 2. 3. 5 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Confirmina fees. procedures and policies concerning annexations of territory to the That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the Districts following resolutions to forego the automatic annexation fee increase for fiscal year 1994-95, and retain the fee schedule currently in effect since 1990-91, amending Districts' resolutions confirming fees, procedures and policies concerning annexations of territory to the Districts, and foregoing the automatic annexation fee increases for fiscal year 1994-95: 1994-1995 Acreage Fee Confirming w/Tax w Tax District Resolution No, Resolution No. Exchange Exchange 2 94-43-2 91-113-2 $2,922 $3,908 3 94-44-3 91-114-3 $3,154 $4,139 5 94-45-5 91-115-5 $3,054 $4,084 7 94-46-7 91-116-7 $2,902 $3,883 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aporovino amended Deferred Compensation Plan for officers and That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt employees Resolution No. 94-39, approving amended Deferred Compensation Plan for officers and employees. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -10- 04/13/94 ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors the General Counsel's Comments Prior to need for a closed session as authorized by Closed Session Government Code Section 54956.9 and " 54957.6 to discuss and consider those items that are specified as Item 12(b)(1), (2) and (3) on the published Agenda. The General Manager indicated a need to add an additional item needing immediate action, and the need for said action came to the attention of the Management subsequent to the posting of the Agenda. General Counsel reported that an additional item could be added pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2(b) upon a two-thirds vote of the Directors. No other items would be discussed or acted upon. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Add an Action Item to the Agenda That Item (12(b)(4)) be added to the Agenda to consider the action of the General Manager accepting the resignation of an employee and appointing that certain employee to a new classification position. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at and 54957 and 54957.E 8:00 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9, 54957 and 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. A report of actions taken will be publicly reported at the time the approved action becomes final re: Agenda Item 12(b)(3). No actions were taken re Agenda Items 12 (b)(2) or 12(b)(4). Action relative to Item 12(b)(1)(d)(1) was taken in open session as reported below. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:58 p.m. the Boards reconvened in regular Reconvene in regular session session. _11_ 04/13/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approval of Memoranda of Understanding with employee That the Memoranda of Understanding with the organizations re salaries. benefits and following employee organizations re salaries, terms of employment benefits and terms of employment, be, and are hereby, approved: Employee Unit MOU Date MOU Period Administrative and Clerical 04/06/94 11/26/93 - 11/21/96 Engineering 04/06/94 11/26/93 - 11/21/96 Technical Services 04/06/94 11/26/93 - 1 1/21/96 Directors John Collins and Margie L. Rice requested that their abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Directors John Gullixson and Daniel Welch requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:03 p.m. DISTRICT 2 The Director of Engineering reported that the Anorovina plans and specifications Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue No. 2-9, was built about 33 years ago in the Subtrunk Sewer. Contract No. 2-9-R1 natural water drainage course. Since that time development took place around the sewer and considerable fill was placed in various spots over the sewer, particularly on the west side of the 57 Freeway, and it has suffered substantial distress. There are 16 offset joints, 6 cracked pipes, and within Gillman Park on the east side of the 57 Freeway, there are 29 offset joints. The recommended project begins at the Cal State Fullerton campus on the north side of Vorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road to Bastanchury Road, and within Bastanchury Road from Associated Road to the Parkside Apartments, for which a private easement has been obtained at no cost to the District from the Parkside Apartments, then continues from Gillman Park to Rolling Hills Drive. This project will replace the old sewer with a newly-aligned larger sewer that is necessary to support a large portion of new development that has been taking place in Fullerton and Brea. -12- 04/13/94 Mr. Dawes then stated that staff recommended approval of the plans and specifications and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Contract No. 2-9-R1. The engineer's estimate for this project is $1.5 million. - It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-40-2, approving plans and specifications for Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-111, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Actions re claims of 245 orooerty owners re Anaheim Hills landslide Receive and file written memorandum of General Counsel The General Counsel reported that District 2 Directors agenda packages included a brief report concerning 245 claims received in connection with 245 homes in the Nohl Ranch area in East Anaheim that slid off their foundations or were damaged. The City of Anaheim declared the homes to be uninhabitable which occurred in January 1993. There are 245 parcels that have filed 15 lawsuits listing as the principal named defendants: City of Anaheim, County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County. Mr. Woodruff stated that the lawsuits go back a few months and the claims go back over six months, as the plaintiffs have been dealing with the other governmental entities relative to claims. District No. 2 had no official notice that they were being considered to be included in the lawsuits. On March 16, 1994, the District received the 15 Summons & Complaints in the mail. The following day a claim was served on the District. There are procedural defects and the claim is clearly defensible, the most important being that the District and the slide area are separated by a major ridgeline. District No. 2's closest sewer line is 2.6 miles away. -13- 04/13/94 Mr. Woodruff further reported that he has met with the attorneys representing the plaintiffs and advised them that the Sanitation District takes a very hard line and rigid position about frivolous claims and lawsuits. A verbal promise had been given that they would advise us by the following day if the District would be formally dropped from the lawsuit. If not, this case has a potential of several millions of dollars with these 245 homes. Mr. Woodruff, however, stated that he was hopeful and optimistic that claimants' attorneys have been persuaded that this is frivolous and will remove the Districts from the case. Otherwise, we will immediately proceed with motions to be removed and then seek to recover the District's costs, including fees. General Counsel then stated he had been requested by all of the other public agencies to effectively sign a stipulation agreement that the District and other governmental entities won't engage in any cross-complaints against each other. He indicated that the District should do that as it was in the District's best interest not to get involved in the cross-fire of claims. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written memorandum of General Counsel dated April 5, 1994 re claims of 245 property owners of the Anaheim Hills landslide, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file claims of 245 Property owners Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the claims of 245 property owners re Anaheim Hills landslide, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, without action to approve, deny or reject; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to represent and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:03 p.m. -14- 04/13/94 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:03 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:03 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Journment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:03 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving agreement with County of Orange for the adjustment of That the Board of Directors hereby adopts manholes on District sewers in Resolution No. 94-41-7, approving agreement coniunction with the County's with County of Orange providing for the 1993-94 street resurfacina program adjustment of manholes on District sewers in conjunction with the County's 1993-94 street resurfacing program in unincorporated County areas within District No. 7, and providing for payment of the actual cost of the manhole adjustment plus 10% for inspection and administrative costs for approximately 84 manholes, at a per-manhole unit cost not to exceed $220.00 nor be less than $155.00 per manhole; and authorizing payment of required deposit of $18,480.00 for said work. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file request for annexation and authorizing initiation That the request from BA Properties, Inc. for of aroceedinas re proposed annexation of 128.734 acres of territory to the Annexation No. 148 - Crawford Hills District, in the vicinity northeast of the Annexation intersection of Chapman Avenue and Crawford Canyon Road in the City of Orange, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-42-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 148 - Crawford Hills Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -15- 04/13/94 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:03 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:03 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:03 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Journment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:03 p.m. A.(� Assistant Sookary erjhe Boards of Directors of County Sanitation istricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -16- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/03/94 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03I09/94 POSTING DATE 03/09/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 136094 AG TECH COMPANY 563.299.10 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-&Bt 136095 AMERICAN TELEPHONE&TELEGRAPH $989.19 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 136096 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $788.73 LAB SUPPLIES 136097 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP. $34,604.23 ENGINE TESTING J-19 136098 AIR DUCT CLEANING $595.00 ELECTRIC PARTS IM099 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $323.25 LAB SUPPLIES 136100 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS,INC. $17.788.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8.9-89 136101 STN-CLOUMBUS $230.63 SUBSCRIPTION 136102 AMICON,INC. $617.29 LAB SUPPLIES IM103 ANALYSTS,INC. $1,657.10 MECHANICAL PARTS 136104 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $194.05 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 136105 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $115.09 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 136105 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $275.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136107 ANTHONY'S MECH&MACHINE,INC. $254.23 MACHINE REPAIRS 136108 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $1.339.00 LAB SUPPLIES 136109 ABC LABORATORIES $4,955.00 LAB SERVICES 136110 ARMOR-VAC $390.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 136111 ARTISTS GRAPHICS $1,005.00 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 136112 ASSOC.ADMINIS.&CONSULTANTS $150.00 DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS 136113 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO. $943.42 LAB SUPPLIES 130114 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $4,052.24 PAYROLL SERVICES tz 136115 BMF CORP.FIRE PROTECTION CO. $300.00 FIRE PROTECTION SUPPLIES --1 136116 BRW SAFETY&SUPPLY $1,783.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 136117 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS $11.09 PUBLICATION 7? 136118 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $1.199.13 BATTERIES I-- 130119 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS.INC. $6,756.34 LAB SUPPLIES 136120 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $417.30 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 136121 BELL SECURITY $4,071.75 SECURITY SERVICES 136122 J&H BERGE,INC. $275.93 LAB SUPPLIES 136123 810 TECH NET,INC. $37.75 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 136124 BLACK B VEATCH $36,O66.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146 136125 BOERINGER MANNHEIM $317.69 LAB SUPPLIES 136125 SOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $30.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 136127 BOOT BARN $405.80 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 136128 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $6,884.07 LAB SUPPLIES 136120 BRIGH WORK DEVELOPMENT $104.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 138130 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $16.49 ELECTRIC MOTOR 135131 BROWNELL ELECTRO,INC. $72.07 ELECTRICAL PARTS 136132 BUDGET JANITORIAL $185.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 136133 THE BURKE COMPANY $63.06 PAINT SUPPLIES 136134 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $316.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 136135 CH2M HILL $21,440.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 136138 CS COMPANY $6,925.74 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136137 CALTROL,INC. $920.11 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136130 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION,INC. $4,073.81 TRUCK REPAIRS 136139 CALIFORNIA HARDWARE,CO. $90.80 TOOLS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3103494 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/09/94 POSTING DATE 03109/94 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136140 CALIF.SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL FIN.OFFICERS $368.00 NOTICES&ADS 136141 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $8.887.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-34 136142 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $2,399.96 OFFICE FURNITURE 136143 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $748.87 SAFETY SUPPLIES 136144 FIBERGRATE/CHEMWEST $1.218.47 PUMP PARTS 136145 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $1.100.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 136146 COASTALMOTION $1,554.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES 136147 LORETTA L.COFFMAN $180.00 SEWER MAPS 136148 COLD SPRING HARBOR $165.65 LAB EQUIPMENT 136149 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $52.50 INSTRUMENT PART 136150 COUCH&SONS $202.374.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9 136151 COMPUTER POWER,INC. $310.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136152 COMPUSA,INC. $205.66 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 136153 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $26.94 TRUCK PARTS 136164 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $6.162.39 ELECTRIC PARTS 136165 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $4.491.23 ENGINE PARTS 136156 COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT $9.600.00 SEWER REPAIRS 136157 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS $1,361.58 DECALS 136158 CUSIP SERVICE BUREAU $475.00 TAXABLE COMM PAPER SERVICES 135159 STATE WRCB/AFRS FEES $21,400.D0 ANNUAL FEES 136150 DAPPER TIRE 5827.11 TRUCKTIRES tL 136161 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT -{ 136162 HSK/DECKER $534.27 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136153 DEPENDABLE OFF-ROAD,INC. $150.00 TRUCK PARTS N136164 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $9.490.64 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-11-93 138185 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $1,595.13 PRINTING 136166 DIGENE DIAGNOSTICS $337.17 LAB SUPPLIES 136167 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $679.30 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 136168 DIONEX CORP. $319.72 LAB SUPPLIES 136169 DRVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $820.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 136170 DREXELBROOK ENGR $69.79 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136171 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $127,562.00 INSURANCE PREMIUMS M.O.2-9-94 136172 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $2,308.39 PAINT SUPPLIES 136173 DYNEX $4.025.21 MECHANICAL PARTS 136174 E.C.S. SW7.00 PUBLICATION 138175 EIL INSTRUMENTS,INC. $119.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136175 ERI INTER-BIO $11,096.25 LAB SERVICES 136177 ESP NORTH $1,146.01 VALVES 136178 EASTMAN,INC. $9.680.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136179 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 136180 ENTECH LAB AUTOMATION $2.107.80 LAB EQUIPMENT 136181 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $357.60 LAB SERVICES 136182 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $226.40 AIR FREIGHT 136183 FERRELLGAS $40.86 PROPANE 136184 FICO'S APPLIANCE SERVICE $75.41 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 136185 FILTERLINE CORP. $124.76 PUMP PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/OL94 'PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/09194 POSTING DATE 031OW94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 138188 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $9,148.41 FILTERS 136187 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $48.23 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 135188 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $337.51 LLB SUPPLIES 136189 FLOSYSTEMS $1,385.80 PUMP PARTS 13619D CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $9.858.30 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 136191 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $335.35 PHOTO SUPPLIES 136192 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $20.20 PAINT SUPPLIES 138193 FRY'S ELECTRONICS $104.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136194 THE FUTURE NOW $134.69 PRINTING 136195 GKD-USA,INC. $3.586.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 136198 GST,INC. $2.028.28 LAB SUPPLIES 136197 GTE TELEPHONE OPERATIONS $18,128.00 RELOCATE TELEPHONE COMM EQUIPMENT 136198 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $383.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136199 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $3,848.80 ELECTRIC PARTS 136200 GE COMPUTER SERVICE $1.096.14 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 136201 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $2.578.90 TELEPHONE SERVICES 138202 GEORGE LEECH B ASSOCIATES $207.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS 138203 LIFE TECHNOLOGIES/GIBCO/BRL $114.82 LAB SUPPLIES 136204 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $20.007.39 MECHANICAL PARTS 136205 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $365.00 PUBLICATIONS 136206 WIN GRAINGER,INC. $453.92 ELECTRIC PARTS DO 136207 GRASSY S.T.I. $4,924.15 ENGINE PARTS -1 136208 HID TYPE B GRAPHICS $20.02 PRINTING 136209 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $924.89 TRUCK PARTS W136210 HACH COMPANY $94.45 LAB SUPPLIES 136211 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $362.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136212 HATCH B KIRK,INC. $621.74 ENGINE PARTS 136213 HEWLETTPACKARD $1,144.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136214 HOEFER SCIENTIFIC INSTR. $491.50 LAB SUPPLIES 136216 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $188.62 COMPRESSOR PARTS 136215 HOME DEPOT $136.43 HARDWARE 136217 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. S362.80 PAINT SUPPLIES 136218 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $15,885.00 WATER USE 138219 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STAMP $1,181.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136220 IBM CORP/CUSTOMER SUPPORT $2.451.72 OFFICE MACHINE 136221 IDEKK $403.95 LAB SUPPLIES 136222 IMAGING PLUS $608.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136223 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $67,301.36 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.1 1.18-92 136224 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $518.28 CONNECTORS 136225 INGRAM PAPER $300.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136228 INTEGRATED CONTROLS $369.42 GAUGE 136227 CITY OF IRVINE $3,555.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTMENTS 136228 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $5.51 WATER USE 136229 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1,585.70 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 136230 JAYS CATERING $170.35 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 135231 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $302.84 ELECTRIC PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3I03AJ4 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03109M POSTING DATE 03/09/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136232 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $2.027.26 CHEMICALS 136233 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $185.18 HARDWARE 136234 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER $278.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 136235 KING BEARING,INC. 5391.11 MACHINE SUPPLIES 136236 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 57,328.45 TOOLS 136237 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. 5477.62 SAFETY SUPPLIES 136238 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L LAVOIE 589.97 LEGAL SERVICES-NITZEN 136239 LAYMAN,JONES B DYE,LAWYERS $20.00 LEGAL SERVICES-COOPER M.0.5-13.92 136240 ORANGE CNTY DIV.-CALIF LEAGUE OF CITIES $200.DO ASSESSMENT DUES 135241 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $622.70 DEFERRED COMP TRUSTEE 136242 SOHO-LYNCH CORP. $718.91 JANITORIAL SERVICES 136243 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $1,708.40 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 1362" MACOMCO $606.94 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136245 MAG-TROL,INC. $1,037.48 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136246 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $256A2 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 136247 MEMBREX $682.83 LAB SUPPLIES 136248 MES COMPANY $1.212.20 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 136249 METAL SUPPLY,INC. $1.368.53 METAL m 136250 CROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $916.63 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.11-18-92 MI X 135251 MIDWAY MFG,B MACHINING $5.865.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 136252 MILLIPORE AND/OR WATERS $309.43 LAB SUPPLIES DDo 136253 MISCO $1,168.38 LAB SUPPLIES y 136254 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,319.28 UNIFORM RENTALS 136255 MOLECULAR RESEARCH CENTER $52.00 LAB SUPPLIES 138256 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $2,720.00 LAB SERVICES 136257 MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE $10,000.00 RATING AGENCY FEES,TCPP 136258 MORTON SALT $484.68 SALT 136259 MOTOROLA.INC. $766.42 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136260 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $59.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 136261 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1,713.61 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136262 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $351.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136263 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $60.58 WATER USE 1362M OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $450.52 SAFETY GLASSES 136265 OFFICE PAVILIONSONTERIOR RESOURCES $3.272.33 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS 136266 THE OHMART CORP $7.491.15 METER 136267 DX SYSTEMS CO. $20,322.46 CHLORINE M.0.11-18-92 136268 OLYMPIC CREATIONS $1,574.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136269 ORANGE COUNTY FAIR&EXPO CTR $100.00 SPACE RENTAL 136270 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $471.30 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 136271 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $481 A3 FITTINGS 136272 ORANGE OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY $120.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 136273 OWL SCIENTIFIC PLASTICS $504.94 LAB SUPPLIES 136274 OXYGEN SERVICE $1,522.76 SPECIALTY GASES 136275 PSY HEALTH SYSTEMS $664.00 MEDICAL SERVICES 136276 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $352.86 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136277 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $419.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/03/94 PAGE O5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/09M POSTING DATE 03/09/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 138278 PACIFIC BELL $31.85 TELEPHONE SERVICES 136279 PAGENET $1.205.78 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 136280 PALMIERI,TYLER,WIENER, $207.29 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 136281 PARAGON CABLE $35.78 CABLE SERVICES 136282 PARTS UNLIMITED $607.41 TRUCK PARTS 136283 KPMG PEAT MARWICK CPA $4,000.00 AUDIT SERVICES,TCPP 136284 PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS,INC. $36,024.82 CHEMICALS 136285 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $144.141.45 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.&8-91 136286 POLYMETRICS.INC. $1,262.75 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136287 POLYPURE,INC. $25,029.46 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 136288 POST,BUCKLEY,SCHUH 8 JERNIGAN $2,520.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2.9.R1 136289 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $42.00 ICE 136290 PRINCETON SEPARATIONS $368.75 LAB SUPPLIES 136291 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $12.246.50 FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES 136292 PULSAFEEDER $1.360,74 PUMP PARTS 136293 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $463.00 FENCING INSTALLATION 136294 RD SYSTEMS,INC. $5,538.74 SECURITY SYSTEMS 136295 R M CONTROLS $158.34 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136296 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $2,441.29 ELECTRIC PARTS 136297 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1,682.71 TRASH REMOVAL 2 136295 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $2,448.12 LAB SUPPLIES W 136299 BOLT DELIVERY $28.35 FREIGHT 138300 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $1,360.00 OCEAN MONITORING n 136301 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1.320.51 PLUMBING SUPPLIES I 136302 ROSEMOUNT.INC. $191.56 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136303 RYAN-NERCO $415.00 METER 136304 SANTA FIE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $229.18 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136305 DOUG SARVIS $750.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 136306 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $91,609.69 CONSTRUCTION 636 136307 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $302,436.29 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-9-93 136308 SEA COAST DESIGNS $171.91 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 136309 SELCO PRODUCTS CO. $523.37 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136310 SETHCO DIV/MET PRO $306.78 PUMP PARTS 136311 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1SC86 CABLES 136312 SHASTA ELECTRIC $458.44 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 136313 SHURELUCK SALES $9,358.32 TOOLSIHARDWARE 136314 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,163.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 136315 SMITH-EMERY CO. $7,762.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 136316 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $400.00 PERMIT FEES 136317 SOUTH COAST ENVIRONMENTAL CO. $4.685.00 EMISSIONS TESTING 136318 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $16,211.60 POWER 136319 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $18.908.68 NATURAL GAS 136320 SOUTH PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL $2.503.25 CHEMICALS 136321 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $6,100.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 136322 STANDARD 6 POORE CORP. $12,000.00 RATING AGENCY FEES,TCPP 136323 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS $463.40 BUILDING REPAIRS FUNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/03RJ4 PAGEOB REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 030MM POSTING DATE 03/0901 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136324 STRATAGENE $1,298.39 LAB SUPPLIES 136325 GARY G.STREED $1,624.92 ROME.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 136326 SUPELCO,INC. $241.58 LABSUPPUES 136327 SUR-LITE CORPORATION $600.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 136328 TCH ASSOCIATES $2.736.00 LAB SUPPLIES 136329 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $184.31 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 136330 THOMAS FISH COMPANY $107.25 LAB SUPPLIES 136331 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $85.01 LOCKS&KEYS 136332 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO. $9,248.80 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.1-13.92 135333 TRAINING CONSULTANTS INTER $1.047.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 136334 TRANSMATION,INC. $193.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136335 TREBOR ELECTRONICS $63330 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 136336 TRIPPE MFG.CO. $500.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136337 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $297.28 TRUCK PARTS 136338 TRUCO,INC. $263.99 LAB SUPPLIES 136339 TRUESDAIL LABS $3,101.72 LAB SERVICES 136340 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $930.29 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136341 TUSTIN DODGE $75.93 TRUCK PARTS 136342 TUTLECLICK CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH $20,025.92 TRUCK PARTS 136343 UNION FOODS $18.451.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT = 1363" UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $463.61 PARCEL SERVICES 136345 UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII $11.510.50 NWRI FUND TRANSFER 136346 VWR SCIENTIFIC $6.794.82 LAB SUPPLIES 136341 VALLEY CRIES SUPPLY CO. $4,016.43 PLUMBING SUPPLIES D? 136348 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $736.89 OFFICE SUPPLIES m 136349 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $941.30 FREIGHT 136350 VERNE'S PLUMBING $828.92 PLUMBING SERVICES 136351 VERTEX SYSTEMS $578.56 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 138352 VILLAGE NURSERIES $92.63 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 136353 VOLLER SAVAGES ASSOC. $2,887.50 INSURANCE CONSULTANT 136354 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $15,850.91 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8.12.92 136365 WESCO $1.435.85 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 136356 WHATMAN LAB SALES,INC. $432.55 LAB SUPPLIES 136357 JLWINGERTCO. $45&54 ELECTRIC PARTS 136358 WIRTH GAS EQUIPMENT CO. $9,160.90 ENGINE PARTS 136359 WTTEG $2.612.94 LAB SUPPLIES 136360 XEROX CORP. $11,038.13 COPIER LEASES 136361 XEROX $3.979.53 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 136362 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. $660.18 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 136363 NORMAN E.CULVER $11.76 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 03109/94 $1,783,818.56 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/03194 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03109/94 POSTING DATE 03/09194 SUMMARY AMOUNT R2 CAP FAC FUND 2,520.00 M3 OPER FUND 6.205.61 tl5 OPER FUND 222.27 85 CAP FAC FUND 91.609.69 07 OPER FUND 22.032.57 07 CAP FAC FUND 316.00 011 OPER FUND 786.36 A11 CAP FAC FUND 42.690.00 914 CAP FAC FUND 207.29 8586 OPER FUND 106.14 k566 CAP FAC FUND 177,935.58 #7&14 OPER FUND 9.963.00 JT OPER FUND 1,004,169.51 CORE 204,626.28 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 38,567.97 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 181,959.29 = $1.783,818.56 Cy a v FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/17/94 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 323/94 POSTING DATE 323/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 136384 AG TECH COMPANY $48,39844 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.9.91 136385 AIHCE,REGISTRATION COORDINATION $805.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 136386 ATM AA,INC. $8,957.80 LAB SERVICES 136387 AT&T $2,958.48 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 136388 AT&T $222.04 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 136389 ARRON BROTHERS ART MARTS $118.84 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136390 .ACCESSORIE AIR COMPRESSOR $92.08 MECHANICAL PARTS 136391 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $788.73 LAB SUPPLIES 136392 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $385.31 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS 136393 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $314,257.60 CONSTRUCTION P2-53.1 136394 AMER.SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY $250.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 136395 AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTION $394.10 LAB SUPPLIES 136395 AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO. $20,009.13 CONSTRUCTION P2-51 136397 ANALYSTS,INC. $1,224.37 ENGINE PARTS 136398 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $235.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136399 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,311.62 NOTICES&ADS 136400 APPLIED SIOSYSTEMS,INC. $2.119.74 LAB SUPPLIES 136401 ABC LABORATORIES $955.00 LAB SERVICES 136402 ARENS INDUSTRIES.INC. 92.854.97 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 136403 ARMOR-VAC $432.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES Z 136404 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $564.40 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 136405 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE $1.750.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 136406 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $145.48 BUILDING MATERIALS 136407 ASSOC.ADMINIS.&CONSULTANTS $3.932.80 DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS 136408 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT F-+ 136409 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO. $517.20 PUMP PARTS 135410 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $4,585.42 PAYROLL SERVICES 136411 BC WIRE ROPE&RIGGING $324.07 HARDWARE 136412 BRW SAFETY&SUPPLY $1,233.74 SAFETY SUPPLIES 136413 BANANA BLUEPRINT $2,880.60 PRINTING M.O.10.10.90 136414 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $328.21 BATTERIES 136415 HAUER COMPRESSOR $173.49 COMPRESSOR PARTS 136416 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $17.070.63 LAB SUPPLIES 135417 BEAR COMMUNICATION,INC. $115.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 136418 DON C.BEATTIE P.E. $800.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 136419 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $8,744.10 LAB EQUIPMENT 135420 J&H BERGE,INC. $1,679.87 LAB SUPPLIES 136421 A BIEDERMAN,INC. $47.10 INSTRUMENT PART 136422 BIO-RAD LABORATORIES $119.30 LAB SUPPLIES 135423 BUCK&VEATCH $3,550.02 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-25-1 136424 BOERINGER MANNHEIM $595.68 LAB SUPPLIES 136425 BONA-RUES $197.75 TRUCK PARTS 136426 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $14,990.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18 136427 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY $705.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136428 C.P.I. $1,015.47 LAB SUPPLIES 136429 CS COMPANY $8,858.58 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/17I94 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 323194 POSTING DATE S/23/94 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136430 1994 CWPCA CONF CIO NIVER $1,720.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 136431 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $7,00D.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES M.O.1-12-94 136432 CAPITAL WESTWARD $174.34 REGULATORS 136433 CARLETON ENGINEERS $6,718.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 136434 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $52,294.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33&J-34 136435 CHEM SYSTEMS $4.942.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 136436 FIBERGRATE/CHEMWEST $20,482.96 WELDING SUPPLIES 136437 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $443.42 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135438 LORETTA L.COFFMAN $64.00 PUBLICATION 136439 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $221.61 PUMP 136440 COUCH&SONS $13.102.00 EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIR 136"1 COLLEGE PLACEMENT COUNCIL $220.00 SUBSCRIPTION 136442 COMPUTER POWER,INC. $4,710.50 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136443 COMPUSA.INC. $3,870.70 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 136444 COMPUSERVE $311.03 COMPUTER SERVICES 136445 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $319.64 TRUCK PARTS 136446 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $12,250.44 ELECTRIC PARTS 136447 CONTINENTAL FREIGHTWAYS $351.39 FREIGHTCHARGES 135448 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS,INC. $2.415.50 TOOLS IT'tr'11 136449 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $110.37 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 2 136450 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $10,513.26 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.7-17-91 136451 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $826.74 TRUCK PARTS DO 136452 R.E.COULTER CRANE RENTAL $604.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL DO 136453 CHARLES P.CROWLEY CO. $1,377.33 INSTRUMENT 136454 D&H TRUCK EQUIPMENT $9,164.13 TRUCK PARTS N 136455 DAILY PILOT $49.50 NOTICES&ADS 136458 J.W.D•ANGELO CO.,INC. $693.59 FITTINGS 135457 DAPPERTIRE $827.99 TIRES 136458 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $273.26 LAB SUPPLIES 136459 CALIF.DEPT.OF FISH&GAME $662.00 PERMIT FEE 138460 DEZURICKANDIORCSCO. $13,998.86 VALVES 136461 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 54,710.64 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.B-11.93 136462 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $245.68 PRINTING 136463 DIONEX CORP. $1,373.11 LAB SUPPLIES IM464 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE.INC. $4,576.27 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL M.0.1.13.97 136465 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $2,245.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE&REPAIRS 136466 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $633.45 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 136467 ARNI DUNN,MFCC $1.130.00 EMERGENCY CONSULTING SERVICES 136468 ESP NORTH $542.60 LAB SUPPLIES 136469 EASTMAN,INC. $3.850.48 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136470 EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SPEC. $7,000.00 'THINK EARTH"CONTRIBUTION M.O.5-13-92 136471 EMERGENCY MGMT NETWORK $6,545.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 136472 ENCHANTER,INC. $5.600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.&10-92 136473 ED ENGLAND INSTRUMENTS $710.32 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 136474 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $359.80 LAB SERVICES 136475 F&M WELDING $533.36 WELDING SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3117194 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 3I23/9I POSTING DATE 323/94 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136476 FMC CORP. $320.00 LAB SUPPLIES 136477 MARSHAL PARRIES $78.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 136478 FAVORITE FOODS $23,156.91 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 136479 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $451.40 AIR FREIGHT 136480 FISCHER B PORTER CO. $333.50 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 136481 FISHER HAMILTON SCIENTIFIC $215.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136482 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $67.12 LAB SUPPLIES 136483 FOOTHILL PROJECT MANAGEMENT $069.00 RESIDENT NOTIFICATION SERVICES 136484 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS,INC. $475.33 HARDWARE 136485 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $160.79 PHOTO SUPPLIES 136486 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1,129.33 PAINTSUPPLIES 136487 GST,INC. $2.345.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136488 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $329.W LUMBERINARDWARE 136489 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2.484.18 CHEMICALS 136490 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $2.101.13 LAB SERVICES 136491 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $1.554.49 ELECTRIC PARTS 136492 GE COMPUTER SERVICE $711.14 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 136493 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4,178.93 TELEPHONE SERVICES m 136494 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $5,170.52 MECHANICAL PARTS X 736495 N GLANTZ&SON $130.79 BUILDING MATERIALS 2 136496 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES,INC. $211.00 PUBLICATIONS CO 136497 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $1.764.68 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 136498 GRASSY S.T.I. $2.769.76 ENGINE PARTS 736499 DGA CONSULTANTS $3,770.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 �j 136500 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $54.05 PRINTING W 136501 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $150.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 136502 HACH COMPANY $43.16 LAB SUPPLIES 136503 FREDA.HARPER $1,50D.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 136504 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $821.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136505 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $2,686.18 TRUCK PARTS 136506 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1,650.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 136507 PL HAWN CO,INC. $9.325.72 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 136506 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2,083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 136509 HEWLETTPACKARD $363.65 LAB SUPPLIES 136510 HILTI,INC. $1,781.25 TOOLS 136511 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $51.937.70 ENGINEERING SERVICES P7d4 136512 HOME DEPOT $201.98 HARDWARE 136513 HUB CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES $49.51 BUILDING MATERIALS 136514 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $135.77 PAINTSUPPLIES 136515 IDEXX $1.161.21 LAB SUPPLIES 136516 IMAGING PLUS $275.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 136517 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $57.192.18 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18.92 136518 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $708.01 CONNECTORS 136519 INORGANIC VENTURES $221.14 LAB SUPPLIES 136520 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH $216.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136521 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1.260.73 BATTERIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3I1754 PAGE O4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 323194 POSTING DATE 3✓23/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136522 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $33.44 WATER USE 136523 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1,511.54 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 136524 JAVID CONTRACTORS,INC. $249.124.35 CONSTRUCTION P2-23-&1 136525 JETFORM CORP. $114.17 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 136526 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $50.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 136527 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $2,115.21 ELECTRIC PARTS 136528 JOHNSTONE PUMP CO. $22,508.14 PUMP 136529 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE CO. $23.32 HARDWARE 136530 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY $3,239.91 MACHINE SUPPLIES 136531 KARS'ADVANCED MATERIALS,INC. $1,990.00 ENGINE TESTING 136532 KELLY PAPER $75.04 PRINTING 136533 KELLY SERVICES $663.30 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 1365M KIMMERLE BROS.INC. $270.19 PLUMBING PARTS 136535 KING BEARING,INC. $492.73 MACHINE SUPPLIES 136536 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2,853.66 TOOLS 136537 KURZ INSTRUMENTS,INC. $235.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136538 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $596.88 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 136539 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $79.28 PUMP PARTS m 136540 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $120.27 CHEMICALS �G 136541 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $166.39 SAFETY SUPPLIES s 136542 LEGI-TECH $320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 136543 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGR. $67,055.30 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5 136544 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO. $364.07 TRUCK PARTS 136545 CRC PRESS,INC. $349.80 LAB SUPPLIES 1� 136546 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $20.036.97 DEFERRED COMP TRANSFER J• 136547 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $12,911.54 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIR.M.O.10-10-90 136M COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF LA. $37.265.00 TEST/ANALYSIS-JEIP M.O.2-19-92 136549 MPS $5144 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 136550 MACOMCO $38.18 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136551 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $2,447.81 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 136552 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $669,703.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 136553 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $56.04 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 136554 MATRIX SERVICE,INC. $33,212.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.11-10-93 136555 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $239.83 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 136556 METAL SUPPLY,INC. $1.995.10 METAL 136557 MILLIPORE AND/OR WATERS $316.29 LAB SUPPLIES 136558 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $214.01 LAB SUPPLIES 136559 MISSION INDUSTRIES 53,850.16 UNIFORM RENTALS 136560 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $60.06 PUMP PARTS 136561 NASCO WEST,INC. $303,59 LAB SUPPLIES 136562 NATIONAL RESEARCH COUN.-CANADA $655.45 PUBLICATIONS 136563 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 136564 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $642.44 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136565 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $144.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136566 ORACLE CORPORATION $1,750.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 136567 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $69.93 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3117194 PAGE 05 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 3/23/94 POSTING DATE 3/23194 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135568 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE 568.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135569 ORANGE COURIER $200.40 COURIER SERVICES 136570 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $797.99 FITTINGS 136571 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $11,346.10 REIMBURSE WORKERS'COMP INSURANCE 136572 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $709.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES 136573 PACIFIC BELL $138.65 TELEPHONE SERVICES 136574 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $188.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 136575 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $542.12 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 136576 PAINE WEBBER $28,853.44 REMARKETING SERVICES M.O.10.14-92 136577 PAK WEST $70.69 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 136578 PARTS UNLIMITED $1.143.09 TRUCK PARTS 136579 PASCAL 8 LUDWIG,INC. $332.919.00 CONSTRUCTION P7-35-2 136580 PASCAL B LUDWIG $151.250.00 CONSTRUCTION P243-1 136561 PATTEN CORP/TAYLOR INSTR. $226.42 OPERATING SUPPLIES 136582 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $794.21 LAB SUPPLIES 136583 PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS,INC. $12,232.32 CHEMICALS 136584 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. 5746,057.40 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5.8-91 M585 PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP. $183.10 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 136586 POLY ENTERPRISES,INC. 5649.19 SAFETY SUPPLIES fTl 136587 POLYPURE.INC. $17,398.75 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 X= IM588 POSTMASTER $405.00 P.O.BOX RENTAL w 136589 POWER PUMPS,INC. $5.282.44 PUMP PARTS 136590 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $84.00 ICE 136591 MIKE PRLICH 8 SONS $630.00 CONSTRUCTION&35-2 lV 136592 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY $4,143.42 PUMP PARTS In IM593 PULSAFEEDER $125." PUMP PARTS 136594 PUTZMEISTER,INC. $412.00 PUMP PARTS 136595 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $83.72 BUILDING MATERIALS 136596 QUEST MEDIA B SUPPLIES $4.406.98 OFFICE FURNITURE 136597 RD SYSTEMS,INC. $1.283.14 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 136598 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. 517.926.40 CMMS DATABASE DESIGN M.O.S.12-92 136599 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $91.59 LAB SUPPLIES 136600 RED WING SHOES $370.65 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 136601 BOLT DELIVERY $83.79 FREIGHT 136602 THE REGISTER $213.10 NOTICES B ADS 136603 REISH MARINE STUDIES,INC. $1.520.00 OCEAN MONITORING 136604 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $7,79327 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136605 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT.CORP. $166.25 LAB SUPPLIES 136606 RICOH ELECTRONICS,INC. $31000.00 ECSA DEPOSIT REFUND 136607 ROSEMOUNT,INC. $656.16 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 136608 SANCON ENGINEERING,INC. $600.00 PAINT SUPPLIES 136609 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1,329.37 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136610 SARTEDT $307.06 LAB SUPPLIES 136611 DOUG SARVIS $1,125.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 136612 SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS $6.718.60 LAB SUPPLIES 136613 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES.INC. $765.03 SPECIALTY GASES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE N17194 'PAGE 06 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 3123/94 POSTING DATE 3123194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136614 SECURITY SPECIALISTS $160.00 SECURITY COMPUTER PARTS 136615 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,294.78 TOOLS 136616 SHASTA ELECTRIC $9.850.00 ELECTRICIAN SERVICES 136617 SHELL WESTERN EBP,INC. $51,804IK) REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 136618 MARC SHIPMAN 52,125.00 GROUNDSKEEPING 136619 SHURELUCK SALES $14,306.44 TOOLS/HARDWARE 136620 SKALAR,INC. $2.480.39 LAB SUPPLIES 136621 SMITH-EMERY CO. $290.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 136622 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $3,024.00 PERMIT FEES 138823 SOUTH COAST ENVIRONMENTAL CO. $42.456.25 EMISSIONS TESTING M.O.7-14-93 136624 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $57,717.31 POWER 136525 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $63.891.35 NATURAL GAS 136526 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $42.67 WATER USE 138627 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $712.07 DIESEUUNLEADED FUEL 136628 SOUVENIR PHOTO $14.27 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 136629 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $1,894.01 DRINKING WATERICOOLER RENTALS 138830 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $5.600.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 136631 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $528.00 LAB SUPPLIES ITT 136632 GARY G.STREED $6,439.79 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL x 136633 STROMBOTINE PRINTING $1,155.08 PRINTING ti 1366M SUN ELECTRIC CORP. $77.67 TRUCK PARTS to 136636 SUNSET FORD $166.39 TRUCK PARTS 136536 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $88.01 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 136637 TCH ASSOCIATES $125.00 LAB SUPPLIES ti 136638 TARGET $68.69 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 136539 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $908.55 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 136540 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $516.03 MECHANICAL PARTS 136641 3T EQUIPMENT COMPANY $387.56 CABLE 136642 TONYS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $210.88 LOCKS 8 KEYS 136543 TRANE $595.41 VALVES 436644 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $2.720.50 TRAVEL SERVICES 136645 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $1.358.66 TRUCK PARTS 136646 CITY OF TUSTIN $185.03 WATER USE 136647 TWINING LABORATORIES $4,994.02 LAB SERVICES 138648 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $546.60 TRUCK PARTS 136649 USI,INC. $269.32 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 136650 UHLER.INC. $171.015.30 CONSTRUCTION 532$5-33 136651 UNITED CIRCUIT TECHNOLOGY $3,000.00 ECSA DEPOSIT REFUND 136652 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $226.11 PARCEL SERVICES 138853 UNITED SCIENTIFIC PROD. $262.56 LAB SUPPLIES 136654 UNITED STATES BIOCHEMICAL 188.37 LAB SUPPLIES 136555 UNIVERSAL FLOORING SYSTEMS 4,647.00 CARPET 136656 VWR SCIENTIFIC 2,799.25 LAB SUPPLIES 136657 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. 1,647.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136658 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 1,512.17 FREIGHT 138659 VERTEX SYSTEMS 4.632.06 COMPUTER SUPPORT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/17/94 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 3/23/94 POSTING DATE 3123/94 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136660 VILLAGE NURSERIES $732.70 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 136661 VOSSLER&COMPANY $766.36 VALVES 135652 ABB DRIVES $7,812.43 PUMP PARTS 136663 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $15.755.63 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92 136664 WHATMAN LAB SALES,INC. $35.00 LAB SUPPLIES 136885 WTTEG $286.54 LAB SUPPLIES 136666 ROURKE.WOODRUFF S SPRADLIN $56.408.20 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 136657 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $1.792.77 LAB SUPPLIES 13MB YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. $73.70 LAB SUPPLIES 136669 EVERETT H.YORK CO. $997.33 ENGINE PARTS 136670 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 136671 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $160.00 ANNEXATION FEE 136672 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMM. $500.00 ANNEXATION FEE 136673 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMM. $5,000.00 ANNEXATION FEE 136874 CSDOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL $100,000.00 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE RUN-OUT $3,364,059.43 SUMMARY AMOUNT t" #1 OPER FUND $5,194.41 #20PER FUND 11,351.67 #3 OPER FUND 33.716.15 #3 CAP FAC FUND 13,02.00 V #50PER FUND 2,580.69 05 CAP FAC FUND 165.304.30 #S OPER FUND 278.63 #5 CAP FAC FUND 37.78 #7 OPER FUND 10.069.78 #7 CAP FAC FUND 17,906.49 #11 OPER FUND 7,370.36 #11 CAP FAC FUND 2.879.70 #14 0PER FUND 687.88 #14 CAP FAC FUND 188.39 0586 OPER FUND 1,305.29 #586 CAP FAC FUND 14,016.66 #6&7 OPER FUND 2.302.09 #7&14 OPER FUND 6,319.69 JT OPER FUND 547,458.36 CORP 2,019,293.41 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 128,095.51 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 275,201.39 $3,364,659.43 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 . 2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on 19 was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 19w. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this !f day of 19jy. Pe ny xy Ada an Secretary o each oft Bo of Directors of County Sanitati Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7 , 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California F27A.1