HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-03-09 °�1T4ip" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
" OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
G.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
4'ee cou+'� (714)962-2411
March 2, 1994
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 11, 13 & 14
WEDNESDAY. MARCH 9. 1994 - 7:30 P.M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CaPifomia
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of
Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and
date.
ALI
Assistan d r cretary
Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings:
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 16th, at
5:30 p.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 23rd, at
5:30 p.m.
SPECIAL JOINT WORKS - Wednesday, March 30th, at
SELECTION COMMITTEE RE 5:30 p.m.
COMPUTERS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
1O ELL5 AVENUE
00.90%9127
FOUNTAIN V&U Ev,CAUMANIA 92>29-9127
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetinas
March Mar 09, 1994 Mar 23, 1994
April Apr 13, 1994 Apr 27, 1994
May May 11, 1994 May 25, 1994
June Jun 08, 1994 Jun 22, 1994
July Jul 13, 1994 Jul 27, 1994
August Aug 10, 1994 None Scheduled
September Sep 14, 1994 Sep 28, 1994
October Oct 12, 1994 Oct 26, 1994
November Nov 09, 1994 None Scheduled
December Dec 14, 1994 None Scheduled
January Jan 11, 1995 Jan 25, 1995
February Feb 08, 1995 Feb 22, 1995
March Mar 08, 1995 Mar 22, 1995
x.
�- BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127• 108"Ellis Avenue
of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728,8427
Telephone: (714)962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
MARCH 9, 1994 - 7:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code
Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the
meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda
item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be
submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in
compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda
posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member
agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board
Meeting folders)
(5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific
agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As
determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific
item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
(6) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal
reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These
reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chairman
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
03/09/94
(7) EACH DISTRICT
ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following
minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered
by the Chairman:
District 1 - February 9, 1994 regular
District 2 - February 9, 1994 regular j
District 3 - February 9, 1994 regular
District 5 - February 9, 1994 regular
District 6 - February 9, 1994 regular
District 7 - February 9, 1994 regular
District 11 - February 9, 1994 regular
District 13 - February 9, 1994 regular
District 14 - February 9, 1994 regular
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint
and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once
and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented
unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See
pages "A" and "B"
02/09/94 02/23/94
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $538,036.05 $803,402.14
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 385,751.73 1,848,590.58
Joint Working Capital Fund - 151,387.48 152,171 .14
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,700.91 26,613.41
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 8,237.84 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 24,875.26 2,732.08
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 46,562.38 16,759.21
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 329,467.16 714.54
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 4,854.24 21,475.30
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 44,654.43 42,360.06
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 12,416.24 8,082.35
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 102.84 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 2,829.82 540.04
DISTRICT NOS. 1 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 320.10
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT 10,988.15 578,741.94
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 16.10 2,103.18
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 0.00 298.18
S1 .572.880.63 S3,504.904.25
-2-
y 03/09/94
(9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 91jf
All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as
not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any
particular item is requested to be removed from the consent
calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public
in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these
items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by
one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous
ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All
items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered
in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted
from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the
consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding Purchase of One Self-Propelled Aerial
Work Platform, Specification No. E-241 , to American Hi-Lift for a total
amount not to exceed $74,785.00 plus sales tax. See page "C"
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-32, approving Amendment No. 1
to the contract for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification
No. P-140, assigning said contract from Peroxidation Systems, Inc. to
Vulcan Peroxidation Systems Inc., with no change in the terms and
provisions of the original contract dated October 1, 1993. See page
"D"
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to
PacTel Meridian Systems for Amendment No. 2 to the Telephone
System Maintenance Agreement for the Districts' telephone PBX and
related equipment (Specification No. 5-060), to extend said agreement
for a six-month period from February 22, 1994 through August 21 ,
1994, for an amount not to exceed $15,468.00 for existing
equipment.
-3-
03/09/94 V
(9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(d) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to
Swift Dodge in the amount of $43,876.00 plus sales tax for the
Purchase of Four Intermediate Size Four-Door Sedans, Specification
No. V-003, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
Cooperative Procurement Program of the State of California, and State
of California Contract No. 1-94-23-10.
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans
and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2), authorizing a net addition of
$36,228.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. for three
items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of
10 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page
"E"
(f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans
and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-42-2, authorizing a net deduction of $24,407.00 from the
contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for four items of added or
deleted work, and granting a time extension of 12 calendar days for
completion of said additional work. See page "F"
(g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous
Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1,
authorizing a net deduction of $48,807.00 from the contract with
Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for 16 items of added or deleted work.
See page
(h) Consideration of the following actions relative to the plans and
specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1 :
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 7 to the
plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net
addition of $1,032.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper
and C.S. Alper Construction Co., Inc. for three items of
additional work, granting a time extension of 503 calendar days
for completion of said additional work, and assessment of
liquidated damages at $2,000 per day for 26 days. See page
"H"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-33, accepting said contract
as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion
and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. See page "I"
-4-
v
03/09/94
(9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(i) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint,
Roadway Construction Co., Inc. vs. Javaid Contractors, Inc. and
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Harbor Judicial District
Case No. 94CO873, relative to a stop notice filed by a subcontractor
against Districts' contractor, and authorize the Districts' General
Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
DISTRICT 6
(1) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional
Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for
preparation of plans and specifications relative to Abandonment of
Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and
California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the
Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for
said services. See page "J"
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-36-6, approving said
agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, on an hourly-
rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to
exceed $57,585.00. See page "K"
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any
-5-
03/09/94
01) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve staff Summary Financial
Report for the six-month period ending December 31, 1993 (Copy enclosed
with Directors' agenda material).
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee and
consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees'
written reports of their meetings on February 16, 1994 and
February 23, 1994, respectively (copy enclosed with Directors'
agenda material).
(b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said
Committees:
(1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate a one-
year extension of contract with KPMG Peat Marwick for annual
audit services for the 1993-94 fiscal year.
(2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit proposals for
a multi-year engagement beginning with 1994-95 for fiscal year
auditing from the "Big Six" accounting firms and any other
qualified accounting firm that has submitted a request to be
included, for consideration by the Fiscal Policy Committee.
-6-
t'
03/09/94
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of the following actions relative to Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment
Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-48; Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility
Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No, 21, Job No. P2-47-2, Flare Improvements at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-53-2:
(a) Verbal report of Staff
(b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications
for said project, changing the date for receipt of bids from January 11, 1994 to
February 1, 1994.
(c) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications
for said project, making miscellaneous technical clarifications.
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-35, receiving and filing bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding contract for Miscellaneous Architectural and
Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work
(re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2-47-2,
Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of
Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, to Pascal & Ludwig
Engineers in the total amount of 41,003,899.00. See page 'M'
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business
set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,
the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to
consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel
matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or
54957.6.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b)
matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee
compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure
under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by
the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not
available for public inspection. At such time as final actions
are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the
minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information.
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) Reconvene in regular session
(c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed
session.
-7-
i
03/09/94
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(16) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(17) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(18) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(19) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(20) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(21) DISTRICT
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(22) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(23) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(24) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(25) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(26) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(27) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-8-
03/09/94
(28) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(29) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(30) DISTRICT 13
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(31) DISTRICT 13
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(32) DISTRICT 14
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(33) DISTRICT 14
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-9-
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,CA 9272&8127
Telephone:(714)962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
March 9. 1994 AT 7:30 P.M.
The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items
which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory.
Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since
the last Joint Board meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS
9(a): AWARD PURCHASE OF ONE SELF-PROPELLED AERIAL WORK
PLATFORM. SPECIFICATION NO. E-241.
The self-propelled aerial work platform is used by the Operations and
Maintenance, Technical Services and Engineering Departments. It has an operating
height in excess of sixty feet, and is used to perform repairs, inspections, calibrations,
and testing on facilities such as piping, HVAC, lighting, scrubbers, flares, emissions
monitoring equipment, etc. This unit will be replacing Unit E-662 purchased in 1979
which is obsolete, making support for factory parts and dealer certification impossible.
The replaced unit, E-662, will be sent to auction in an "as-is" condition.
As part of our program to comply with SCAQMD regulations, the Districts are
purchasing this vehicle with an engine capable of operating on both gasoline and
propane, which will assist in meeting clean air goals.
Four sealed bids were received on February 15, 1994. The bids ranged from
a low bid of$74,785.00 to a high bid of$88,539.00, plus applicable sales tax.
Staff recommends award be made to American Hi-Lift, the lowest responsible
bidder, for the Purchase of One Self-Propelled Aerial Work Platform, Specification No.
E-241, for the total price of$74,785.00, including delivery, plus applicable sales tax.
March 9, 1994 i
9(b): ASSIGN CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE,
SPECIFICATION NO. P-140.
At the meeting of the Joint Boards on September 8, 1993, approval was
given to award a contract to Peroxidation Systems, Inc. for a one-year contract for the
purchase of hydrogen peroxide solution, beginning October 1, 1993. The Districts'
were recently advised that Peroxidation Systems, Inc. was acquired by Vulcan
Peroxidation Systems, Inc., a subsidiary of Vulcan Materials Company, of New Jersey.
It is further recommended that the existing contract for Purchase of Hydrogen
Peroxide, Specification No. P-140, with Peroxidation Systems, Inc. be assigned to
Vulcan Peroxidation Systems, Inc., with no change in the terms or conditions of the
original contract dated October 1, 1993.
9(c): APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 RE EXTENSION OF TELEPHONE
SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT (SPECIFICATION NO. S-060).
The Districts own a complex and advanced telephone system which includes
voice mail, automated attendant and digital communication features. The system is
located in the Administration Building at Plant No. 1 but serves both Plants. For the
past two years, the existing PBX equipment has been maintained by the supplier,
PacTel Meridian Systems (PTMS). Staff is studying improvements to our existing PBX
system which include the probable installation of an auxiliary PBX system at Plant
No. 2. This new auxiliary PBX will be tied into the main PBX at Plant No. 1 and will not
require its own attendant console. This new system will increase the reliability of the
telephone lines at Plant No. 2, eliminate existing constraints on telephone equipment,
increase the availability for expansion, improve the quality of the circuitry, and keep
costs down. When staff is prepared to make a recommendation to the Joint Boards, a
maintenance contract will be included in the proposal so that one single vendor will
maintain both the new and existing equipment.
In light of the plans for imminent expansion, Districts' staff is recommending a
six-month extension of the existing maintenance contract to allow time to finalize
planning and acquisition of the new equipment for Plant No. 2, which will be included in
a new maintenance agreement.
Staff therefore recommends that Amendment No. 2 to the Telephone System
Maintenance Agreement with PTMS be approved to extend it for the period
February 22, 1994 to August 21, 1994, for an amount not to exceed $15,468.00 for the
-2-
March 9, 1994
existing equipment. This rate, quoted by PTMS, is a six-month prorated price based on
the rate of the Districts' present agreement with PTMS, which expired February 21,
1994.
9(d): AWARD PURCHASE OF FOUR INTERMEDIATE-SIZE FOUR-DOOR
SEDANS, SPECIFICATION NO. V-003.
Staff is requesting authorization to purchase four intermediate-size new
sedans included in the capital equipment budget for fiscal year 1993-94, to be used as
follows:
SEDAN DIVISION DESCRIPTION
1 3350 To replace 1983 Ford Fairmont oath
(Motor Pool) over 100,000 miles and to be
assigned to the motor pool.
Replaced vehicle to be sent to
auction.
1 3380 To replace 1987 Chevrolet Celebrity
(Operations) with mileage exceeding 100,000;
assigned to the Chief Operator at
Plant 1.
1 3720 Additional vehicle
(Planning and Design)
1 3790 Additional vehicle
(Construction Management)
The Districts propose to purchase the vehicles under the State of California
Cooperative Procurement Program (Contract No. 1-94-23-10). The total cost of the
four sedans is $43,876.00, plus sales tax. Sufficient funds are available in the 1993-94
budget for this purchase.
Staff recommends authorization to issue a purchase order to Swift Dodge of
Sacramento, the State contractor, in the amount of$43,876.00, plus sales tax, for the
Purchase of Four Intermediate-Size Four-Door Sedans (Specification No. V-003). The
cars are delivered f.o.b. Orange County. A separate purchase order will be issued to
the State of California for one percent of the purchase price for procurement under the
State's contract.
-3-
March 9, 1994 ,
9(e): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO OPERATIONS CENTER
EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-23-5-1 (REBID NO. 2)
Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2), Operations Center Expansion at Plant
No. 2, designed by Brown & Caldwell Engineers, is being constructed by Javaid
Contractors, Inc. The current project includes the addition of 8,500 square feet of
basement and first-floor facilities, the remodeling of 1,800 square feet of the existing
building, and a 4,500 square foot enclosed electric-cart parking/charging area. The
work includes new locker facilities, offices, elevator and general upgrades to the
existing building built in 1977 at a cost of$2.3 million. This change order consists of
two items of additional work and one item of deleted work for a net addition of
$36,228.00 to the contract and a 10 calendar-day time extension.
Item No. 1, in the amount of$32,200.00 and a 10 calendar-day time
extension, is for modification and additions to the specked automatic fire sprinkler
system. This project was designed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code and
current ordinances. After the design was complete (November 20, 1991), the City of
Huntington Beach adopted a new Uniform Fire Code which required the addition of fire
sprinklers in the existing building, which did not have sprinklers. This item includes the
costs for increasing the size of sprinkler piping shown on the plans, and added
sprinkler design and permitting costs for fire sprinklers in the existing (1977) building,
as certain areas of the building addition did not have sprinklers. The entire building will
be equipped with fire sprinklers when the work is complete. This item does not include
the costs to repair(or remove and replace) existing ceiling tile and rails as necessary
for the additional fire sprinkler piping; this work will be done on a time-and-material
basis, which will be included in a future change order.
Item No. 2 is a credit in the amount of$2,452.00 for the rerouting of the
sanitary sewer drain line through the boiler and HVAC room of the Operations Center
expansion and under the ramp area to the existing sump. The requirement to demolish
and replace a portion of the concrete slab in the basement of the existing corridor and
mechanical room was deleted because of this reroute.
Item No. 3, in the amount of$6,480.00, is for the replacement of the
reinforced concrete ramp at the west side of the existing Operations Center. Upon
excavation for the new building expansion, an old drainage pipeline was found to be
leaking. The excess flows hampered the new construction in the area. The concrete
ramp was removed to repair the drainage pipe.
All of the above described changes would have been included in the original
design if discovered or known in the design phase-
-4-
March 9, 1994
If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders
to date on this contract will be $36,934.00 with a 36 calendar-day time extension. This
represents an increase of 1.62% over the original contract amount.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for a net addition of
$36,228.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. There is a 10 calendar-day
time extension associated with the change order.
9(f): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT
EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-42-2.
Job No. P242-2 is a $14.5 million contract to expand the secondary
treatment capacity at Plant No. 2 by lengthening the clarifiers and installing other
improvements. This project will increase the secondary capacity from 75 million gallons
per day (mgd) to 90 mgd. The plans and specifications were prepared by John Carollo
Engineers, and the construction contract was awarded in April 1993 to Margate
Construction Inc. This change order consists of three items of additional work and one
item of deleted work for a net deduction of$24,407.00, and a 12-day time extension.
Item 1, a credit of$66,069.00, deletes six thickened waste activated sludge
(TWAS) pumps from the contract. These pumps support the existing DAF thickeners
and had been replaced by Districts' staff after design was complete.
Item 2 adds 175 feet of 2-inch high pressure air piping at a cost of$3,727.00
in order to make a tie-in between existing and new utilities. The tie-in location was
found to be farther away than what was shown on the contract drawings.
Item 3, in the amount of$3,345.00, provides for extra shop-fabrication costs
associated with changing the sluice gate frame material from mild steel to stainless
steel as recommended by Districts' design staff during shop drawing review. The
stainless steel will provide a longer life in the gate.
Item 4, in the amount of$34,610.00, is for the replacement of damaged
portions of the plant water piping system within the existing clarifiers. When the
clarifiers were drained, inspectors found that the main header sections of the existing
plant water system's supports and piping were severely corroded and required
replacement. The replacement at this time minimized disruption to the treatment
process because piping will be replaced during the scheduled shutdowns required for
the contract work. There is a 12-day time extension associated with this added work.
Item 1 is a credit, Item 2 is a contract omission, Item 3 is a change requested
by Districts' staff, and Item 4 involves as unforeseen condition to an existing utility. If
the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on
-5-
March 9, 1994
this contract will be a net credit of$78,407,00. This represents an decrease of 0.54%
from the original contract amount.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for a net deduction of
$24,407.00 from the contract and a 12-day time extension to the contract with Margate
Construction, Inc.
9(g): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PRIORITY PROJECTS
ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT
PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P243-1.
Job No. P243-1, Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to
Facilities at Plant No. 2, provides for construction of four chemical storage containment
areas, addition of an anionic polymer storage and feed facility, installation of a new flow
bypass gate at an existing effluent junction box, construction of a flowmeter test facility,
replacement of demisting sections of existing air scrubbers, removal and replacement
of asbestos-insulated steam piping, installation of new strainers at the plant water
pump station, electrical modifications and other miscellaneous work items. The design
for this $3.4 million project was prepared by John Carollo Engineers and the
construction contract was awarded in April 1993 to Pascal and Ludwig Engineers.
Change Order No. 1 is a net credit in the amount of$48,807.00 from the contract for
fourteen items of additional work and two items of deleted work.
Item 1, in the amount of$2,063.00, is for the abandonment of an undisclosed
42-inch vitrified clay pipe which was discovered and broken during installation of an
excavation dewatering system at Effluent Junction Box No. 1. Item 2, in the amount of
$3,215.00, is for the removal of an abandoned natural gas pipeline and temporary
relocation of an existing digester-gas pipeline (not shown on the contract drawings) to
avoid conflict with construction of a new effluent bypass structure and to keep the
digester-gas pipeline in service.
Item 3, in the amount of$2,025.00, is for the temporary relocation of a
10-inch chlorine solution pipeline at Effluent Junction Box No. 1. It was necessary to
temporarily reroute the pipeline around an excavation to avoid conflict with the
construction of an addition to the existing structure. Item 4, in the amount of
$3,176.00, adds an electrical pull box required to complete the new electrical system
for the weir gate being installed on an extension of Effluent Junction Box No. 1. The
existing electrical pull box shown on the contract drawings did not to have enough
capacity for additional contract-specified conduits.
Item 5, in the amount of$924.00. is for the removal of an unforeseen
abandoned concrete-encased electrical ductbank at the new chlorine absorption
facility. It was necessary to remove and dispose of the existing ductbank to complete
-6-
March 9, 1994
foundation work for a new chemical containment area being constructed at the site.
Item 6, in the amount of$297.00, is for the removal and abandonment of an existing
20-inch diameter undisclosed fiberglass air duct that was discovered during foundation
excavation for a new chemical containment area being constructed around the existing
ferric chloride facility.
Item 7, in the amount of$2,932.00, is for the removal of a section of existing
asphalt paving within the new solution polymer containment area and replacement with
concrete. The paved area enclosed by the new solution polymer containment area was
shown on the contract drawings to be existing concrete. When the limits of the new
containment area were adjusted in the field, the containment area included a section of
asphalt paving which had to be replaced with concrete. The chemical protective
coating system placed on the interior of the containment areas is compatible only with
concrete.
Item 8, in the amount of$4,308.00, is for the extension of an existing
overflow drain and other miscellaneous modifications (not shown on the contract
drawings) within the existing ferric chloride facility, including the repair of existing
concrete damaged by chemicals, removal of an abandoned electrical ductbank and
concrete step, and additional caulking and sealing of the new chemical containment
structure at the facility. Item 9, in the amount of$2,977.00, modifies the structural
connection between the existing Effluent Junction Box No. 1 structure and a new
structural addition, which includes a weir gate for better control of flows. The contract
drawings did not require the two structures to be tied together; however, after
consultation between Districts' staff and the design engineer, it was decided that for
added seismic integrity, the combined structure could be strengthened by integrating
them for a relatively low cost.
Item 10, in the amount of$470.00, is for the removal of an undisclosed
abandoned concrete obstruction encountered during an excavation at the Plant Water
Pump Station. This obstruction interfered with construction of the support foundation
designed for new plant water strainers being installed at this location.
Item 11, in the amount of$1,670,00, involves piping modifications to allow for
the future use of a test-meter probe at the new flow meter test facility located at the
Ocean Outfall Booster Station, requested by the Districts' Instrumentation Department.
Item 12. in the amount of$14,015.00. is for the furnishing and application of
a chemical protective coating on the existing exposed concrete areas within the new
solution polymer and ferric chloride containment areas being constructed under this
contract. The contract specifications required coating of all new exposed concrete, but
did not include coating of existing concrete surfaces within the containment areas. It
was the intent of the project to apply a chemical protective coating to all concrete
-7-
March 9, 1994
surfaces within the containment areas. Staff found it to be more cost-effective to
perform the total coating application of both existing and new concrete surfaces at this
time. The preparation and mobilization costs were significantly decreased by
performing all the coating work at this time, in lieu of performing this extra work under a
future project.
Item 13, in the amount of$756.00, is for modification of an existing basin
catwalk support (not shown on the contract drawings) to accommodate the new
emulsion polymer facility wall being constructed under this contract.
Item 14, in the amount of$6,425.00, is for modifications to the contract-
specified bleach tank. Tank construction required resin materials that are suitable for
storage of bleach solution. Districts' staff subsequently determined that the use of a
bleach solution may soon be replaced with hydrogen peroxide due to potential changes
in Air Quality Management District's regulations to eliminate volatile organic
compounds. Thus, the contractor was directed to modify the specified tank to allow the
Districts to use multiple chemicals. This item of work was required due to a change in
operating procedure by the Districts after this project was under construction.
Item 15, a credit to the contract in the amount of$76,844.00, results from the
deletion of the modification of twelve existing scrubber towers shown on the contract
drawings. The scrubber towers were to be cut apart and sections added for
installation of new demisting sections to provide better odor control. Upon field
verification of the dimensions of the existing scrubbers, staff determined that the
interior height was sufficient for installation of the new demisting sections without
cutting apart and reworking the existing scrubber towers.
Item 16, a credit to the contract in the amount of $17,216.00, resulted from
modifying the procedures to remove an existing influent flowmeter(A& B), which is
presently not in use and abandoned. Districts' and contractor's staff, working together
in a "partnering" effort, determined there could be a substantial savings to the contract
by abandoning the existing pipeline with the installation of brick and mortar plugs. This
would allow the work to be performed inside the adjacent structures. The savings
resulted from deleting the excavations, structural concrete caps and existing pipe
section removals.
-8-
March 9, 1994
Miscellaneous rehabilitation projects within the plants, including Job No.
P243-1, cover a large variety of different, unrelated construction items located in many
different areas of the plants. Due to the complexity of these projects, field changes are
often initiated based on actual conditions encountered that differ from those anticipated
or known in the design phase. All of the above changes fall into this category.
The original contract amount for this project was $3,398,000.00. This change
order for a net credit in the amount of$48,807.00 results in a decrease of 1.44% from
the original contract amount.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for a net deduction of
$48,807.00 from the contract with Pascal and Ludwig Engineers. There is no time
extension associated with this change order.
9 (h): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 7 TO ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP
DRIVES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P242-1. AND
ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE.
Job No. P2.42-1, Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, is
a $9.5 million project that includes the replacement of thirteen existing internal
combustion engines and three existing electric motors, replacement of existing influent
pumps, and construction of a power building for variable-frequency-drive equipment.
This job was designed by John Carollo Engineers. Change Order No. 7 adds
$1,032.00 and 503 calendar days to the contract for three items of added work and an
assessment of 26 calendar days for liquidated damages. This contract is now
complete.
(1) Chance Order No. 7
Item 1, a negotiated settlement, covers charges associated with the
delay between June 12, 1992 and December 8, 1993 for $20,440.00
and includes a 501 calendar-day time extension to the contract. The
additional costs associated with this item are the reimbursement of
monies due the Contractor because of the delay in the start-up of the
Central Power Generation facility which impacted this project and
delayed its completion. The Districts suspended work on this contract
due to delays with the start-up of the Central Power Generation
facilities project. The Districts could not allow the removal of existing
engines, under this contract, which drive major pumping systems and
maintain dual-fuel pumping capacity, until the Central Power
Generation project was brought into service.
-9-
March 9, 1994 -
Item 2, in the amount of$9,037.00, is for modifications requested by
our Operations staff to the pump sequencing controllers associated with
the Headworks' main sewage pumps. Also included is the development
of additional video display screens for operator interface (control) of the
plant-water pump system.
Item 3, in the amount of$23,555.00 and a 2 calendar-day time
extension, is for the removal of the old existing engine bases to prevent
a safety hazard.
Item 4 is an assessment of$52,000.00 against the contractor for
liquidated damages due to several problems and delays associated
with the final field testing of the variable-frequency drives.
If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change
orders on this contract will be $111,231.00, with 525 days time
extension. This represents an increase of 1.19% over the original
contract amount. Errors and omissions account for approximately
0.75% of that total percentage.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 7 for a net addition of
$1,032.00 and 503 calendar days to the contract with Ziebarth and
Alper and C. S. Alper Construction Co., Inc.
(2) Acceptance of Contract as Complete
Ziebarth and Alper and C. S. Alper Construction Co., Inc. has fulfilled
all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time.
Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached with
the agenda material, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete,
execution of the Final Closeout Agreement, and filing of the Notice of
Completion as required. The final project cost is $9,480,231.00.
9(i): AUTHORIZING GENERAL COUNSEL TO DEFEND DISTRICTS
INTERESTS PERTAINING TO WEST COAST SAND AND GRAVEL VS.
JAVAID CONTRACTORS, INC.. RE JOB NO. P2-23-5-1(REBID NO. 2).
The Districts were recently served with a Summons and Complaint in the
above-referenced lawsuit filed in the West Orange County Municipal Court. The action
is by a subcontractor to enforce its rights pursuant to a stop notice, alleging that it had
not been fully paid by the general contractor of the Districts on Job No. P2-23-5-1
(Rebid No. 2) for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2.
-10-
March 9, 1994
The Districts have no fault or responsibility with regards to this action, but
since they have been named as a party to the lawsuit, preparation of an answer or
other responsive pleading to the complaint is necessary. After that, the Districts will
simply await the final outcome of the dispute between the general contractor and the
subcontractor, and based upon their agreed settlement or a court judgment, the
Districts will then disburse the sums which they are holding.
The Districts will be entitled to and in fact will deduct from the sums being
held, the full amount of the legal fees and costs incurred by the Districts in handling this
matter.
The only actions for the Boards are to receive and file the Summons and
Complaint and authorize the General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the
Districts, as necessary.
DISTRICT 6
90): APPROVE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING
CORPORATION RE ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK SEWERS AND
CONSTRUCTION OF WATSON AVENUE SEWER AND CALIFORNIA
STREET SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 6-13,
The rerouting of the College Avenue Pump Station Force Main allows a
general cleanup of old sewers in District No. 6 and the Costa Mesa Sanitary District.
The northerly half of District No. 6 has been served by two sewers constructed for the
old Army Airbase in the early 1940s, now the site of the Orange County Fairgrounds,
as well as developed areas north and south of the Fairgrounds in the City of Costa
Mesa. These lines are old and in very poor shape. Once the major flows are
intercepted by the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, now under construction, these lines can be
abandoned. The project includes constructing a small collector sewer in Watson
Avenue, direct connections to a new sewer in California Street, and abandonment of
the old sewers.
In September 1993, the Selection Committee negotiated a professional
services agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of the design,
construction plans and specifications, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead,
plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees and fixed profit in an amount not to exceed
$57,585.00. In February, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved for this
project, an action necessary to satisfy CEQA requirements prior to start of design. The
Selection Committee is now, therefore, submitting the agreement for the Boards'
consideration.
_11_
March 9, 1994
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work, and adoption of
a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering
Corporation. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting
agenda documents.
ALL DISTRICTS
11: FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 1993.
Enclosed are the budgetary financial statements for the second quarter of the
fiscal year. The Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Budget statements were
reviewed by the Fiscal Policy Committee on February 16. 1994. If any Director has
questions pertaining to the statements, please call Gary Streed, Director of Finance, at
(714) 962-2411, extension 2500.
12: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FISCAL POLICY/-
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES.
The Fiscal Policy Committee met on February 16, 1994, and the Executive
Committee met on February 23, 1994. Enclosed for the Directors are written reports on
their deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards.
13: APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM AND AWARD MISCELLANEOUS
ARCHITECTURAL AND TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT
NO. 1. JOB NO. Pl-48: MISCELLANEOUS WORK FROM JOB NO.
P247-2 AND FLARE IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO.
P2-56: AND SEISMIC RETROFIT OF STRUCTURES AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-53-2.
In December 1993, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for
Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No.
P148; Miscellaneous Work from Job No. P2-47-2 and Flare Improvements at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-53-2. This project includes several jobs designed by both consultants and staff,
combined to reduce administrative costs as well as attract lower combined bids through
economies of scale.
The first project, Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant
Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P148, combines miscellaneous projects
designed by staff with items of work designed by Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers,
Inc., under Job No. P140-2. Work items in Job No. P1-40-2 fall into two categories: 1)
-12-
March 9, 1994
items requiring extensive research and design (design scheduled for completion next
year); and 2) items requiring little or no research (design complete). Handrail systems
are one of the items for which design is complete. Staff decided to separate the
handrail systems and install them at the earliest possible date for safety reasons. The
other items from Job No. P140-2 for which design is complete are demolition of old
gas-flare bases at Plant No. 1, and modifications to existing gates on Primary Clarifier
Nos. 6 through 15 with portable operators. These items were also included in Job no.
P1-48 for economies of scale.
Miscellaneous projects designed by staff and included in Job No. P148 are
as follows:
Revisions to Building H to provide work areas for previously assigned
staff and to construct an air-gun paint booth.
Construct a wheelchair lift In Building 5 as part of an overall effort to
allow handicapped access to all personnel-occupied buildings.
Construct an access ladder and railing system for roof access to the
Central Power Generation facility at Plant No. 1 for safely reasons.
Replacement of hatches for the overflow boxes on Digesters 12, 14, 15,
and 16 because the existing hatches are too heavy to lift safely.
Construct soundproofing modifications to offices in the Administration
and Control Center Buildings.
Modifications to the Primary Polymer facility to switch the polymer feed
system from reclaimed water to City water for better operation of this
facility.
Repaint the flares at Plant No. 1 for consistency of color. The original
paint looks poor.
The second job in this contract package is Job No. P2-56. This project
includes work items designed by Lee and Ro from the previously approved Job No.
P2-47-2, as follows:
A hand-rail system for Plant No. 2 required for safely purposes.
Demolition of old gas compressors and conversion of Compressor
Building for electric cart parking.
Installation of sludge piping in dewatering facility.
Reroute hot water supply and return lines at Digesters F and G, and
install piping and valving for isolation of either digester.
Modification to the bulkhead storage rack at the Ocean Outfall Booster
Pump Station pit.
-13-
March 9, 1994
Work incorporated into Job No. P2-56 by staff includes the repainting of
flares at Plant No. 2 for consistency of color. The existing paint also looks poor.
The third job included in this contract is Seismic Retrofit of Structures at
Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2. This project, designed by Holmes and Narver,
provides earthquake strengthening to the Plant Water Pump Station Building and
Primary Power Building A
(1) AddendumNo. 1
Addendum No. 1 postponed the date for the bid opening to February 1,
1994.
(2) Addendum No. 2
Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications makes miscellaneous
modifications and technical clarifications to the plans and
specifications.
(3) Award Contract
On February 1, 1994, 4 bids were received for said contract. The bids
ranged from a high of$1,774,430.00, to a low of$1.003,899.00.
submitted by Pascal and Ludwig Engineers. A complete bid tabulation
is attached to the supporting agenda material.
Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 1 and award of the contract to
Pascal and Ludwig Engineers, for their low bid amount of$1,003.899.00. The
engineer's estimate was $1,000,000 for Job No. P148, $200,000 for Job No. 132-56
and $150,000 for Job No. P2-53-2, for a total of$1,350,000.
14: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION.
From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session
to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation,
personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the
California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is
needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda
each month providing for a closed sessi*Geral
lar eting, if deemed necessary
by the Boards. 'I 1�
Sy ester
Ma ger
JWS:jt
-14-
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 Cuum SarrallN DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
"a March 9, 1994 +oau ewsavEuue
va eas e+z>
FOUNIYM VGLLFV,fJLIfaPWG 92>2A4+2>
mY sszx++
Joint Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
of Orange County, California
Subject: Summary Financial Report for Six Months Ended December 31, 1993
Transmitted herewith is the Summary Financial Report for six months ended
December 31, 1994. The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint
operations and the individual Districts through the first half of the 1993-94 fiscal year
and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1993-94
budget for all Districts is $635.9 million, of which approximately 33% is for capital
expenditures for facilities improvements and additions, including reserves for said
capital projects. The total budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several
Districts are set forth below.
TABLE I
COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY
(MILLIONS OF DOLLARS)
IRmeasa 1993-94
REQUIREMENTS 1992-934 1993-940 Dacassa %of Budaat
JOINT TREATMENT WORKS 0, M& R S 48.6 B 49.6 8 1.0 7.8%
COLLECTION SYSTEM &OTHER DISTRICT 0, M&R 11.3 12.6 1.3 2.0%
TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 80.6 70.0 (10.6) 11.0%
DISTRICT SEWER CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 29.4 27.4 12.0) 4.3%
DEBT ISSUE& SERVICE 10.0. &C.O.P.) 39.0 41.4 2.4 6_5%
SUB-TOTAL $2069 $201.0 8 (7.91 316
CONSTRUCTION RESERVES $110.1 $110.0 S 1.1) 17.3%
OTHER RESERVES 219.2 324.9 106.7 fill%
SUB-TOTAL $329.3 4434.9 $106.6 68.4%
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $638.2 $636.9 S 907.7 11®.0%
FUNDING
CARRY-OVER $ 96.4 S 73.3 4122.1) 11.6%
APPROPRIATED RESERVES 208.8 347.0 138.2 64_6%
SUB-TOTAL 304.2 $420.3 4116.1 66_1%
TAX ALLOCATION $ 34.2 S 31.9 S (2.3) 5.0%
FEES" 77.5 89.6 12.1 14.1%
BORROWING 98.6 60.0 (38.6) 9.4%
INTEREST &OTHER 23.8 34.1 10.3 6.4%
SUB-TOTAL $234.0 $215.6 $ 08.4) 33. b9°
TOTAL FUNDING 5638.2 $63c.9 $ 907.7
'ADJUSTED FOR INTER-DISTRICT TRANSACTIONS.
"1992-93 USER FEES WERE INCREASED $9.6 MILLION TO RECOVER PROPERTY TAXES
CONFISCATED BY THE STATE SUBSEQUENT TO BUDGET ADOPTION. THE BUDGETS WERE NOT REVISED.
�m
Summary Financial Report
Page 2
March 9, 1994
I
Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and
expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects and
respective share of the joint works expansion. Authorized general reserves and inter-
fund transfers have been excluded from the budget column on said statements as
expenditures are not charged directly against such appropriations.
Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements
are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district cash transactions for
fiscal 1993-94 which were accrued in 1992-93 are not reflected in the year-to-date
balances.
CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Earned interest generated by our continuing program of investing reserve funds
(primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) is
$13.8 million through the first half of the year. As of December 31,1993, 86% of our
funds were invested with the County Treasurer's commingled investment program. The
remaining 14% of funds, representing the debt service reserves for the 1990-92 Series
B and C COP issues and the unspent proceeds of the 1990-92 Series C issues, is in a
separate special bond fund at the County Treasurer's or a guaranteed investment
contract, both controlled by the trustees for each issue.
JOINT OPERATING FUND
This fund accounts for operations, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to
the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. The JO expenditures along
with the self-funded insurance program costs are monitored by the Fiscal Policy
Committee and if some unexpected expenditures are experienced, they are reviewed by
the Committee.
Salaries and Wages - There are several authorized but unfilled positions and, thus, some
minor payroll savings have been realized to date.
Emolovees' Benefits - Includes Retirement, Workers' Compensation, Unemployment
Insurance, Group Medical Insurance and Uniforms.
Charnebacks to Districts and CORF - Payroll expenses are charged back to CORF
through the cost accounting system for work on the treatment plants' capital expansion
program, and to individual Districts for work on Districts' collection facilities capital -
expansion projects as well as maintenance and repair of said systems. Source Control
Division charges to respective Districts are also included in these chargebacks.
Gasoline. Oil & Fuel - Includes all fuel for motor pool. A large portion is recovered
through our equipment billing system and included in revenue below.
Summary Financial Report
Page 3
March 9, 1994
Insurance - Budget amount includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy,
employee fidelity, boiler, fire, earthquake and all risk insurance policies. Expense is in
line with annual budget.
Memberships - Includes the cost of membership in CASA, AMSA, SARFPA, WateReuse
and other organizations. Annual membership costs are recorded when paid.
Office Expense - This account includes various types of office supplies, postage,
stationery, computer supplies and related items.
Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals - Primarily for influent and sludge odor control at
treatment plant sites. The main chemicals used to control odors are chlorine and
ferrous chloride. Ferric chloride is used as a supplemental odor control chemical, and
caustic soda is also used in air scrubbers throughout the plants to reduce hydrogen
sulfide emissions. Recent bids for chemicals will increase costs for the next nine
months.
Chemical Coagulants - Expenditures for this item are required to dewater our sludges
prior to disposal to comply with Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements.
Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as solvents, cleaners, janitorial,
tools, lab chemicals, etc., purchased throughout the year.
Contractual Services - The major elements in this line item are payment for grit removal
and disposal at the BKK landfill and payment for removal and off-site beneficial reuse of
biosolids or sludge.
Professional Services - Primarily consists of General Counsel's fees, other legal
services, audit fees, and miscellaneous consulting services.
Printing and Publications - Includes all reproduction activities in-house and with outside
services.
Equipment Rental
Outside Equipment Rental - Primarily for the rental of large cranes and equipment
necessary for removing and replacing major pumps, engines and other large
equipment during the course of maintenance and repair operations.
CSDOC Equipment Rental - Reflects the charges for District-owned equipment
used for overhead type activities. There is an offsetting credit applied through
the cost allocation system for these charges.
Summary Financial Report
Page 4
March 9, 1994
Repairs and Maintenance - This item includes parts and supplies for repair of plant
facilities. Escalating costs continue to have a significant impact on this item.
Generally, this account runs close to budget each year due to the unpredictability of
major equipment failures.
Research and Monitoring - Budget includes funds for the ocean monitoring contract
required by our NPDES permit. Other projects include operational research and
evaluation of processes to develop optimum operating parameters, and also include the
Districts' annual share of participation in the Southern California Coastal Water
Research Project.
Travel, Meetings & Training - Major items are authorized by specific Board actions.
Expanding activities of regulatory agencies and the Clean Water Act reauthorization
have required additional staff and Board travel.
Utilities - The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased natural gas
for the start up of central power generation. Utilities expenses are in line with the
budget estimates and are down $1,486,557 from last year.
Other Expenses - For items not chargeable elsewhere such as freight, safety supplies,
grounds maintenance supplies, etc.
Prior Year's Expense - This account is required by the Uniform Accounting System and
represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the
previous year or payment of charges which could not be accrued at year end.
Generally, all expenses to this account are recorded in the first quarter.
Allocation to Districts and CORF - This is an account established in connection with the
cost accounting system and represents materials, supplies and services, overhead
chargebacks to the individual Districts and CORF.
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts' jointly-
owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 35% (excluding
reserves) of each Districts' budget requirements for 1993-94. During the first six
months, $16.9 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities
improvement and expansion projects. The pro-rata share of joint works improvements
and expansion costs is reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts.
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS - The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the
nine Districts and include each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund
and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund.
Summary Financial Report
Page 5
March 9, 1994
Taxes: Tax revenue is allocated to two separate accounts:
Tax Allocation - This account represents the anticipated allocation of the
Districts' pro-rata share of the maximum 1 % basic property tax allowed under
Proposition 13, subsequent to the 92-93 state tax shift. Receipts are in line
with expectations.
Tax Levy - This account represents tax funds necessary to make principal and
interest payments on voter-approved outstanding general obligation bonds. In
accordance with the Jarvis-Gann initiative, tax levies to satisfy these obligations
are not restricted. Only District 11 has a 1993-94 tax levy for bond service.
Federal and State Construction Grants - EPA and SWRCB have previously funded up to
87 Y2% of treatment plant construction for approved projects. All outstanding grant
funds have been received and no new grants or SRF loans are budgeted.
Fees - All Districts now have an adopted, uniform sewer connection fee schedule. This
account also reflects industrial waste user charges levied by seven of the nine Districts
pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the Revenue Program, and the
user fees implemented in Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13. Annexation fee
revenue is unpredictable and, thus, is not included in the budgets unless there is an
existing agreement providing for payment of fees.
Sale of Capacity Rights - This account records income from sale of capacity rights to
outside agencies such as SAWPA, including the capital replacement charge. SAWPA is
billed in the fourth quarter each year.
Other - Includes the annual joint facilities interdistrict equity adjustment required by the
recalculation of the respective ownership percentages. Cost of this adjustment for
purchasing Districts is included in each District's Share of Joint Works Construction.
Share of Joint Works Construction - Represents each District's share of joint treatment
and disposal facilities expansion discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
(CORF), and the purchase of joint facilities interdistrict equity when appropriate.
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense - Payment of principal and interest on
outstanding general obligation bonds and certificates of participation of the respective
Districts. Annual budgeted expense for all Districts is approximately $38 million.
Share of Joint Operating - Represents each District's share of operating and maintaining
the jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs
are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint
Operating Fund statement for details).
Summary Financial Report
Page 6
March 9, 1994
District Operating and Other Exoenditures - Consists primarily of individual Districts'
general operating expenses, industrial monitoring, operations, maintenance and repair of
the respective Districts' collection systems.
DD:GGS:lc
c:wro M%OrW.xm3.e.e4
r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING/WORRING CAPITAL FUND BUDGET REVIEW
6 MONTHS ENDED 1WI193
APPROVED
BUDGET YEAR-TO-DATE UNEXPENDED YEAR-TO-DATE
1993-94 EXPENDITURES BUDGET %EXPENDED
SALARIES.WAGES&BENEFITS
Selados&Wagon 30.053,000 14.524.696 15,528,104 48.33%
Payroll Baronts 6.317.000 2,T78,763 3,538,237 43.99%
TOTAL PAYROLL 38,370,000 17.303,659 19.D88,341 47.55%
Lose: Chargeoud to Dlsd&CORF (10.200,00D) (4.881,708) (5,3DB,294) 47.96%
NET JOINT OPERATING PAYROLL 26.170,000 12.411.953 13,758.047 47.43%
MATERIALS SUPPLIES&SERVICES
Gasoline,Oil& Dlosol 220,000 91.070 128,930 41.40%
Insurance 1,165,0D0 537.138 627.862 46AI%
Mombemhlps 58,000 28,945 29.055 49.91%
OHlce Expense 396.000 183,949 211.051 45,57%
Chlorine&Odor Control 2,376,000 1.085.082 1,310.918 44.83%
Chemical Coagulants 1,1,78,000 471,936 1.306.004 25,54%
Other Operating Supplies 1,105.000 476.866 828.134 43.16%
Coniroctual Services 5.702.000 3,390.016 3,305.9114 50.67%
Professional Servlces 904.000 319.632 584,468 35.35%
Printing&Publication 345.000 160,921 184.076 46.64%
Equipment Rental 235,000 108,016 126.984 45.95%
Repair&Maintenance 3.870.000 1,731.688 2,138.312 44.76%
Research&Monitoring 3.431.000 1,380,159 2,OW,641 40.23%
Travel,Meeting&Training 22&OW 87.351 137.849 38.82%
Uncolloctlble Accounts 10.000 (1,831) 11,831 A8.31%
Utilities 3.650.OW 1.783,918 1,866.082 48.87%
Other Expanse 930,0W 384.083 545.937 41.30%
Prior Years,Expense 50.0130 (70,280) 129,2B0 -158.58%
Non Operating Expense 60.000 31,755 28.242 52.23%
TOTAL MATERIALS&SERWCES 27,508.01)(1, 12.157,297 15,351.703 44.19%
Leta: Allocation to Died&CORF (000,000) (220.961) (379.039) 36.83%
NET JOINT OPER MATERIALS&SERVICE 25,909,000 11.036.336 14,972,684 14.36%
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 53.079.000 24,348,W9 28,730.711 45.87%
REVENUES
Revenues (3,510.000) (1,706,589) (1743.431) 50.33%
Love: Allocation to Cleo&CORF 10,000 8,527 1,473 85.27%
NET JOINT OPERATING REVENUES (3,5W,000) (1,758,042) (1,741,958) 50.23%
NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 49,579.000 22.590,247 26,988.753 45.56%
GALLONAGE DATA
M.G.FLOW CHARGES
DISTRICT BUDGET TO DATE BUDGET TO DATE
1 8.584 4,X0 4.003,000 2.367.048
2 28.450 14,007 15,490.01H) 7.709,080
3 28.730 11,657 15.643,000 6.416.0e4
5 2,924 1.561 1.592,000 852.062
6 4.632 1.586 2,522.000 1.038,140
7 6,783 3.794 3.693.000 2.088.005
11 5753 2,689 3,133.0110 1.468.933
13 798 417 434,O00 220,781
14 2.788 751 1,518,000 413,354
89,422 41,042 48,688,1101) 22,590,247
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-1
SUMMARY OF JOINT WOWS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS page 1 of 4
FISCAL YEAR 1993.94
6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/93 Prepared By: Big Aldridge
(11 (21 (3) (4) (51 - 161
WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED
ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY . TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET
1993.94 199394 @ 8130193 TO 12MI/93 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 .3
A.New and Rabudgeted Major projects:
1.Westchester Oisp&Sample Stn P1-27-11213 6/942-A.B 305.000 200.000 2 2 200.000
Transfer to Projects Below (171L5911 (176.591)
Chemical and Weatehaular Facility Modif is,PI.48 62239-A 1,400.000 142,519 6,817 142.519 149.336 0
Interim Wasteheuler Dumpl,Fac,P1.46.1 52239-C 217.000 34,072 34,072 34.072 0
2.Secondary Trmt Expansion to 80 MGD.P1-36 63717-0 36.222.000 750,000 3,329.262 205,697 3.534.959 544,303
Transfer to projects Below 135,0361 (11.473) 0 111,4731
Elxtri6catbn of Pump Dm ee,Pt-36.1 53717-A 6,318 6.318 16.3181
Secondary Treatment Expansion.P1.36.2 53717.9 2.928 2.920 12,9281
Bltlg 5 Modifn for Reloc of Source Control Inspectors to
Make Way for P136 621660 35.035 11,473 14,675 12,783 27,458 0,3101
3.primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion,Pt-37 53719.0 31.425,000 600.000 115,210 1,443 116.653 498.557
4.Sacrosy&Landxapi,,P1.38.1 52108-F 1.630.000 1,OOO.00D 200.655 64,036 264,69t 936.964
S. Misc,Mods.Priority Elements P1-38-2 52108-G 6.370.ODD 3.500.000 750,059 620,858 1.270.917 2,979,142
S. Misc.Modifications Pt-36-4 62108-H 4,100.000 2.000.ODO 341.141 22,230 363,371 1,977.770
Transfer to Project Below 168410001 0
12KV Disminnion System for Support Facilities,Pt-47 52256.0 684,000 0 0 O
7. Rre prosso ion.Sign.,.and Water Diet.Made.,Pi-38-5 52106-J 2,475.000 150.000 174,346 68,416 242.761 811585
S.Elect Facility Modgns 6 Safety Upgredes.Pl 40-1 62187-A 2,902,500 200,000 16.803 10,926 27,726 189.075
9.Fac Modina&Safety Upgrades,PI 40.2 52167-8 4,604000 600,000 33,670 100,083 139.753 393,917
Transfer to project Below 134.2221 134.222)
Mlac Amhiectwal&Treatment Pit Impmyements.PI-4 52268.0 1,626,500 34.222 34,222 34.222 0
10.Pnm Clarifiers 3.4&5 Rehab. P1-41 52199-A 2,021,500 76,000 20,968 61686 27.064 68.314
11.M1ac fmproyerrents,PI-42,PP48 52219-0 2,205.000 140,000 14,353 78,093 92.446 61.907
12.Seimlc Retrofit of Non,Structure Systems,P1-43 52229-A 4,260,000 1.6001000 50,856 57,289 IOSA45 1,442,711
13.Seismic RmrofN StructU4 Pt�44 52125.8 24,000.000 700.000 304,410 359,403 663,813 340.597
14.40 MGD Oeygen Actiyeted Sludge&DAF's 70.000,000 0 0
1 S.Bell presses(4 Unita) 151600.000 0 0
16.Solids Stomla f4 Gine1 I I1000,000 0 0
17.Digesters: 2 0 110' Diameter 91100.000 0 0
18. 12ky Electrical Power Distribution 2,300.000 0 0
1 S. Emergency Sewage Bypass System 4,000,000 0 0
20,Remgys Trickling Filte s 1 &3 11000.000 0 0
21.Central Air Compressor Station 2501000 0 0
22.Mix.Projects (See Schedule C) 13,250.000 2.000.000 7.157 97.374 0 104.631 1.902.626
23.Other Mercer Plan projects 0 0
a.HaedWorks No. l Rebuild.2003 14,960,000 0 0
b.Headworks N0.2 lmpellerftmp Speed,2015 2,600,000 0 0
c.Remove Trickling Filters 2&4.2007 1.300.00O 0 0
E.40 Mgtl Devi ACYd Sludge&DAF,2017 34,000,000 0 0
e. 110'it Deletions, 2003&2012 18,200.000 0 0
1.4 Batt presses. 2004 10,920,000 0 0
g. 12 KV Power Distribution.2001-2012 I,IO(LOOO 0 0.
h.Standby Power Generation.2005&2016 5.000,000 0 0
i. 72 Mgd Pnmary Treatment.2004&2012 32,500,000 0 0
SUB-TOTAL -RECLAMATION PLANT 1 372.624,500 13.215,000 6,380,384 1.831,374 0 ],211,758 11,383.626
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE S-1
SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4
FISCAL YEAR 1993-94
6 MONTHS ENDED 12MI/93
III RI 131 (4) 15) 161
WORK REVISED TOTAL REGUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED
ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET
1993-94 1993.94 @ 6(UO/93 TO 12M1193 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 -3
B. Plant 2 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects:
1.Support Facilities and Site Improvements
a.Operations Building,P2.23-6-1 53716-0,A 2.510,000 11600.001) 549.799 932,480 1,482,279 567,620
b.Warehouse Building.P2.35.2 51813-H 2,625,000 1.400,004) 181.729 39,029 220,758 1,360,971
c. Maintenance Building.P2-35-3 5181BF 2.725.000 11800,000 163.133 21.226 184,359 1,778,774
d.Construction Management Office.P2-35.4 51813-G 601000 50,000 146.874 36,608 182.480 13,394
e. Phase II Site&Security Imp.,P2-36-5 51813-E 2.100,000 850,000 97,383 10,429 107.812 83%571
2.Rehab Digester I,J.K,P2.394 52046-0 7,925,000 loo,00D 415.911 1,707 417.618 98,293
3.Rehab Oigeater L.M.P2-39-2 3.600,000 100.000 0 1001000
4.Rehab Digester N,0.P2-39-3 4,800,000 100.000 0 100,000
S.Primary Treatment 24 MGD Expansion.P2.41 53714-0 15.204.500 4,601 98 4.597 1961
6.Electrification Project,P2-42-1 53718-A 101150.000 150.000 9,463,057 579,566 10,062.623 1429.5661
T.Secondary Treatment Expansion,P2.42.2 53718-0.8 17.100,000 8.000.000 2,168,619 4,286,847 6.455,466 3,713.153
S.Priority Misc. Mod. .P2-43 1 62108-5 6,760.000 3.000.000 962,633 1.513,189 2.465.721 1.488.812
S.Misc.Modifications,P2-43-3,P2-55 52108-E.52239 8 7.555,000 2.600.000 73.557 149.448 223,005 2.350.552
10. Manitor/Contrcl System,P2.041See J-23-21 52094-0 3.225,000 275.000 1,898.146 89,095 1,967.240 205,906
11.Fee Protection,Signs&Water Diet.Modiins,P2.46 62176-0 4.664,000 160.D00 62.270 97.221 159.491 52.779
12.Eisen Fec Machin&Safety Upgrades,P2-47-1 52189-A 3.452.500 2000OD 8.698 5,722 14.420 194.278
13.Fec Modilna&Safety Upgrade..P2 47 2 52189-B 4.006,000 600,000 19,001 1O7,513 126,574 392.487
14. Primary Clarifier Rehab. P2.48 52199.8 5,247.000 400,000 63,912 7,162 71.079 392,833
1 S. Misc Improvements at Rant 2.P2-49 52220.0 303,000 200,000 15.538 37,484 53.022 162,516
IS.Barrels Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems.P2-50 52229.8 4.760.000 2,000,000 113,068 17,888 130,956 1,982.112
17. Seismic Ronalit Structural P2.53 62108-C 36,000.000 5,000,000 738,803 399,224 1,138,027 4.600,776
Transfer to Project Below I7,188) I7.1881
Miss"ends Madifns&Rare Improvements,P2.56 52269.0 239,000 7,188 7,188 7,188 0
10.Solid.Storage: 2 Bins _ 5.200.000 0 0
19.Additional 105 Foot Digester 4LOW.000 0 0
20.Rent Water Pump Station 1,200,000 0 0
21.Misc.Projects IS.Schedule DI 13.180.000 2,00(%000 68,505 145,193 0 203,698 1,854,807
22.Other Master Ran Projects 0 0
a.Replace Primary Basins A.B.C, 2006 11.700.000 0 0
b.Standby Power Generation,2005&2015 10.0001000 0 0
c.Monitoring and Control System,2006 520,000 0 D
SUBTOTAL -TREATMENT PLANT 2 188.981,000 30.276,000 17.214.096 8,464.317 0 25,678.413 21,010,683
C.Ofisite Water Reclamation Rents
1. Site Accuifitian SAO0,000 5.000 000 0 5,D00,000
Transfer to Project Below 16081 (608)
Reclmation Rant No. 1 Water Quality Management Stud 58231.0 280,000 BOB BOB 608 0
2. Reclamation Rent 3 52133-A 40,600,000 50.000 606.090 24.667 530,757 25.333
SUB-TOTAL- RECLAMATION PLANTS 45,990,000 5,050.000 506.090 25.275 0 531,365 5.024,725
D. Interplant and Joint Facilities 0
1. Imerplem Facilima.1.9 63713.0 24,000,De" 500,D00 20.999,092 1.096,644 22,095.736 1596.6441
Transfer to Project Below 1236,900) 114,0TT1 (14,077)
Industrial Water Pipeline Extension at Plant 2 53713-A 235,900 14,077 24,T28 226,232 250,960 (212,155)
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE 6-1
SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4
FISCAL YEAR 1998-94
6 MONTHS ENDED I WIM3
Ill (2) 131 141 1W 161
WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED
ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET
1993-94 1893-94 @ W30193 TO 12131193 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 .3
2.Support Facilities and Site Improvements
e.Admin.Annex at OM Lab Ste.J.30 6 J 11-1 62063-0,A 4,150,000 200,000 981986 15.262 114.247 184,738
b.OperatiaufCgnlrol Center.J-23-1 53712-A 5,000.000 100.000 120,933 20,167 147,100 79,833
c.Computer Equipment.J-2Y2 1See P2-sal 53712.8 2.525,000 25,000 2.073.464 87.479 2,160.933 (62,479)
d.Personnel Sterling at Ph 1.J-26 63716-0 219601000 1,400.000 107,401 23.126 130.527 1,376,874
a.Damo6don of Old Control Center 450.000 350,000 0 350.000
I.Demolition of Support Bldg.@P2,J-27 62084.0 1.300,000 500.000 89.952 0 89,952 500.000
g.Central Lob ImprovemergsrUpgra Res J-17-1,2,3 52257.0 742.000 742,000 13.640 13,640 728.360
3.Central Genera ion Facility 0 0 0
a.Equipment Prepurohue,J-19A 53707-C 22,730,000 360000 20,468.832 (7,407) (20.200.9011 258,524 387,407
b.Emission Purchase.J-19B 53707-A.8 3.100,001) 0 3.060.080 0 12,104.5801 945,500 0
c.Plant 1 Facility,J-19-1 53707-A 20.800,000 300.000 20,419.110 684.194 21,103,304 (384,194)
d.Rem 2 Facility,J-1 S-2 53707-B 29,060,000 am." 27,624.455 334,774 127,961.0861 (21.857) 465,226
e. Engine Evalugetbn and Restoration 3.500,000 21000.000 0 2.000.000
Transfer to Projem Before 1192.165) 1192.1661
J-19.2 Engine Demaga Rehab @ part 2 53707-E 176,747 1,554.356 616,250 2,170,605 (439.503)
J-19-1 Egine Do".Beheb @ Plant I 63707-F 15,418 364,941 23.880 378.621 (8,2621
4.Waste Gas Flares,J-21,J-21A 52040A 30.00D 61000 125.706 108,532 234.238 1103.5321
5.Oudel&Booster PUMP Stan..
a.Rep.OWfa5 No. l Land Semion,}22d 63711-A 1.64QW0 40,000 1,601,490 36,863 1.637.153 - 4,337
b.Egtdpmem PreMmhem J-IS-A 53703-A 4,500.000 300,000 23.463 150.758) 127.3051 350.758
c.Tamp 02 Station for Oudtll W. 1 2.600,00D 0 0 0
d.Se cral MschvBe Header DOSS'C' 4,425,000 25,000 0 25.000
e. Replace 78'w1l 20'OW1811 to Deep Water 61.250,000 50,000 0 $0,000
6.ComWtedced Faolity RemMs and Dwg.System J-25.1 5821" 3,610.000 1,00D,000 0.320 10.8" 74.190 989,136
7.Seed.Power Systems Rehab.Studer J-25-2 58216�A 5001000 30D,000 1,843 1.643 298.357
S.TNephorrTNemetry MOmtoring Ex,J-28 52146.0 530.000 400,000 66.297 311.360 367,657 BB,640
9.Standby Power Reliability Mor line,J-33 52240�0 15.Oo0.000 1.000,000 2.186 303,965 306.151 696,035
10.Ocean Oudall Re5abf5ry Upgrades,J-34 S2241-0 14,000.000 2.000,000 2,147 307,235 309.382 1.692.765
11. Buahard Interplant Trunk Replacement 31.000.000 0 0 0
12. Sludge Disposal Projema - 0 0 0
A,Compost Demonstration Pent 9,000,000 0 0 0
b.Lend Acquisition 21,960,000 100.000 0 100.000
c. Landfill Devtlopment Phaeei 28,600.000 0 0 0
d.Compost Facility 50,360.000 0 0 0
13.Dlatrim Information Morugement Naterink 0 0 0
a.Main.6 Oper Mgmm Computer System 52149-A SO0.000 250,000 509,577 132,482 15.2991 830,760 117,518
b.Lab Information Mane9ement System Upgrades 52149.8 260.000 260,000 16,334 9,919 26.253 240,081
c.Porchaelng/AwoumingfFnamitl Information System 52149-C 1,501,000 750.000 1,412 50.671 52.083 699.329
d.Network System Integration 820,000 MIOOD 0 340,000
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-1
SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4
FISCAL YEAR 1993-94
6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/93
(1) (2) (3) (41 (5) (6)
WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED
ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET
1993-94 1993-94 @ SM0/93 TO 12/31/93 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 -3
14. Improved In-Plant Sampling Facilities 1151000 100.000 0 100,000
16.Effluent Sampler Systems J-32-1.2 52212-0 325,000 186,000 47,492 264,383 311,875 (79,383)
16.Other Master Ran projects 0 _ 0 0
a.Expend OOBS'C'to North 2019 2],125,000 0 0 G
b.Sludge Diap.Landfill Phase II 2011 16,600,G00 0 0 0
c.Sludge Map.Equip Phase I&II 2001 11,500JJ00 0 0 0
17.Water Quality Diversion and Treatment Study ISARII 58221-0 1201000 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000
10. Mhc Projects Moo Schedule El 11.710.000 1.5001000 200,79e 259,103 (11,702) 448,199 1,240,897
SUB-TOTAL -INTERPLANT&JOINT 429,258.000 15,892,000 99.640,536 4.879,103 150,303.6681 54,216.0]1 11.012.897
SUB-TOTAL - MAJOR PROJECTS 1.036.843.500 64,432.000 1 122.741,106 1 15,200.069 (50.303,568)1 87,637,607 49,231,931
E.Special "facts.Studies,Research&Development
1.Action Man:
a. NPOES Permit(Application) 68209-F 375,000 50,000 340,307 13,986 354,293 36,014
b. NPDES Fermat(MONtaring Changes) 100.000 501000 0 501"
2.Solids Treatment.Disposal and Reuse 1,150,0GG 1 fi0,G00 0 150,000
Transfer to Reject Below (1,710) (1,710)
Sludge Disposal Related Projects 58214-0 1,710 254,441 1,710 256.151 0
3.Air Quality Control Program 0 0
a.Air Taxies Inventary 1A32588 w/PEER 1.548.000 300.000 0 300,000
b.Touts and ROG Control:Biofilter R&D 58227-0 3801000 330,000 31,225 75,600 106,725 254.600
c.Air Emissions Source Control 50.000 60.000 0 60,000
d.SCAOMD Rule 431.1:Solfur Control 200,000 200,000 0 200,000
e.SCAQMO Rule I I79:Odor Control 670,000 420,000 0 420.000
I.SCAQMD Marketable Formte Program 501000 60,000 0 BOOM
g.Toaice Risk Reduction Program 250,000 260,000 0 260J300
I A.O.Database Development 75.000 50.000 0 50,000
4.Water Consery&Reclamation R&D Projeata- 8501000 100.000 0 100.000
Transfer to project Below (38,170) (19,845) 0 (19.845)
Row Monitoring for Water Carom Project Fe 1 Pen 3 58223.0 39,170 13.781 24,389 0 24,389 13.781
Uhravlolm light Pilot Rem 52133-C 6.064 7,448 7,448 (1,394)
5.Evlommental Research&Development 2,785.000 600.000 0 5001000
Transfer to projects Below (1.000,]39) (10518") 0 1105,864)
Donal&ApPI of Molecular Tech to Direct Indicator&Pathogenic 0 0
Microorganisms in Treated W/W NWRI project WQ-9 68228-0 453,918 47,824 160.463 99.824 260,297 162,0001
Cdlaborauve Need Study Using Molecular Tech to Detect Hepetitus A Virus 0 0
&Virulence Factor Genes in E.COIi.NWRI proi HR-92-0 58229-0 496,821 8.040 (18,175) (39.176) (57,350) 47,215
Spatial&Temporal Wastewater Discharge Rums Study 582300 50,000 50,000 34,165 34,165 15,836
S.Master Plan Update 3.600,000 1001000 0 100,CG0
Transfer to Project Below (1,306) (1.306)
Air Quality Management Implementation Ran 68232-0 375,000 1.306 1.308 1,306 0
SUB-TOTAL-SPECIAL PROJECTS 12,U83,000 2,600,000 ]92.860 194,764 01 987,414 2.405,236
F.Equipment Items 48,469,000 3.000,00I1 248.25] 1,551,766 11,214,6231 595.400 1,438.234
SUB-TOTAL-JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 1.097.395.600 70oO32,000 123,]82,013 160960.699 '161,618,1911 .9,220,421 53,076,401
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS COMPLETED AT 6/30/93 SCHEDULE F 6,389.222 (62,584) 1143ollOJI 6.183.520 62,584
TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 1,097,395,600 70432,000 130.151.335 16,894,015 (51.661.30911 95,383,941 1 53.13],ASK
Comity Semisoft..Dfatri f No.1 4
Summary Quarterly Financial Report
a Alumina Ended 1NJ1N3
Budget Steel. j
1993-Be Remaining Yem4o41ats
Budget Ye014043ete Budget %Espended
Beginning Fund Balances,July 1 36,191,470 .
REVENUES:
Tea Levy Bond Fund(.j Onlyj 0 0 0 0.0014
Test Allocationaguleverilon,(Store of l%) 2,030,000 1147.£11 1,182189 41.73%
Federal and Slats C nedauctboo Grents 0 0 0 0.0011C
Connection Fees 105A00 M316 130.6M 20.80%
()leer Fees 8,580.000 3,0114A83 S505507 46.81%
Sete of Capacgy,Rights 138,000 0 ISl 000%
Interest&Misc.Receipts 2,ON,000 1110,456 BBB.544 55.70%
OMer 1125,000 0 1,125,000 0.00%
Total Revenues, I;O54,00 a,O4p76 B.aN,624 4218%
Total Rd ..up&Beginning Balances 4IX6,M
E fEQYDITIJRES'
Slue of Joint Works TML Plant Is Reserves 18.58A000 1,853.143 16.9n.257 8.90%
District Trunk So.Constr.&Reserves 00.i'm N,W 35l 11.68%
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 9,814p00 1,42&O99 0.387,901 14.53%
Share of Joint Worse Operating Esponses 4,74g000 2.N7.W 2381 49.85%
Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00%
Dianna Operating&Me,Expenditures 651.00o MB 903 383,OBT 44M%
Total Exporedduras M.1fa 0 6,TN,4N NA18,6N 116.31%
Ending Fund Balances 3BA94AN
Fadihles Expanslo.
Balance Adjordemons TrMufarlp Unfit.
MRS &Additions Rased Meade IMIM3
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
1-16 Softy.,Rd.Trunk ModlOcadom 563.631 45,730 709,361
2d Memory Lena lnmmepl.r l&2 3N2411 027 40 ,175
5u0.Total 1,062,979 46166T 0 111091636
Share of Joint Works 127M.105 1,653,743 (5.052.476) 0,328 M2
SubTotsl 12.7til 5 1,6113,743 (5,052,476) 9,320,062
COMPLETED PROPERTY.PLANT&EQUIP:
land and PropBM Rights 81,39e 81 398
Coliectlon Undo and Pump SMa. S.M.133 S.TT9,133
Treatment Facilities 0 a
Disposal Facilities 11.593 11,593
Ss, mal Plant and Admin.Fact. N.241 58,241
ERudy In Joint Treatment Fecll. 50,930,164 27,844 5,052.476 62.910,484
OMer Media m Coed Lees Amon 0 a
Total Property Plant&Egulp. 78,6NR03 1,78,244 0 78,370,447
_ Coumy San/NUon Dmof fNo.2
Summery OudrtNy Flnncel Report
B Monts Ended IWIMLI
Budget Ra low
1993-W Bernard, YBvb
Budget Ya..i Mlle Budget %Expanded
Beginning Fund Balanced,July 1 210,711
REVENUES:
Tn Lan(Bond Food(.)Only) 0 0 0 0.00%
Tax AlloratlonNSubveMlond(Shea of l%) 6,560,000 4.268,285 5201,715 44.65%
Federal and Stet corldbuNon Grants 0 0 0 0.00%
Connactlon Fen 1.783,000 1,136A03 828,507 64.e01k
Mer Fees 22BB6.000 11,549.7211 11,118.2T2 50.86%
Sale M Capacity Right 388.001, 0 3W,000 0.0051,
IntraM S ll Receipt 8,319,001) 4n7.568 4.01 WIM
1 0 0 a 000%
Tatl Revenues 42.T08.000 21.182,176 21,623,BU MAIN%
Total Revenue 5 Beginning Balances ID1,SaIm
E)(PFNDT RES:
Slmmof JoiM WOMB Trend.Plant S Reserves 55,11,67,000 e,920,102 51.03T,SW
DisMM Trunk Sewer Comb.S Reserves 2,162.000 80.585 2101,e35 IBM
Bond Refimment and Internal Expense 25,974.000 3.981,4911 21,BB9,502 15.30%
S"M MJolm Worke Operating E Mrne 15.774,000 7.70.680 8,081.320 AB.BB%
Provided ter Reimbursement Agreement 0 0 0 C.00%
Diall Opened,SO Mar Expendit. 22A3,000 838.385 1.403.015 37.42%
Toll Expendtturae 102.120,000 17,521,210 BeAW,TN 17.16%
Ending Fund Beences 210,119,015
FaollBfes Expnelon
Balance Ad)ustrimme Tranetrt laterite
711193 SAddMone Feed Aesnt 12131I93
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS'
2-14-5R2 SARI Manholo 0 706 TOM
Foul Air Bypna @ SARI Maetr Motor am BABE
25-1 UncOln Interceptor all 20 B 2S
226 Sewer Enweament for AT S SF Commuter Roll 1W 114 w
25-2 Oren,S Oliva Subtrunk 2.W7 2WT
24ta Memory lane Me. 5 2 2.033,191 0,725 2A39,918
252 SawTe Trunk Um Diversion Gat 5 Monitortg Sys. 1 W I"
251 URI Relief Sower 82,764 771 83.635
243 Palm Ave.Perelman Agreement 31,517 16.928 0,418
2-9MI Cypraes Ave.SUWunk Serer Rolmb. 213,338 VAN 250.W2
Mac Chge to Closed WOM Omen 2,282 706 ISO
245EUUt Trunks etercaptr 570 AO
Suo-Tobl 2ABB,WI "An 0 2A1T.1T2
Shereof Joint Works 3T.933,137 (Spi (1s.05l r2) v.802B8T
Sub-Toll 3T.933.137 eA211.102 (15mim 2Tou"
COM L 0 PROPERTY PLANT B EOUIPI
Land and Property Rlgnte 517,BW 51].BW
Collection Lines and Pump Ste. 91.611,WB 81,811,0W
Treatment Faclllllse 0 0
Dlnpoeel F..IIM s 33.172 33.172
General Plant elm Admin.Fool. TW,W9 200,1149
Equity In Joint Treatment Facll. 186.038,288 (536,316) 15,059,172 180,9131,252
Otcr Aeeeb M CM,t Lees AmorL 0 0
Total Property Plant S Equip. 2H,081,1W AA63,]51 0 303,500414
County Seemed n Depend No.3 -.
Summary OoU Ludy Financial Report
6AUMUUEMOMUlYJ193
Budget Rovlew
1993-84 Remaining Year4 uww
Budget Year- Date Budget %apended
Beginning Fund Baiancee,July 1 W3,1197,890
REVENUES:
Taa Levy(Bond Fondle)Only) 0 0 0 0.00%
Tax AOocathatelSubventione(Sham of 1%) to ng,000 4.863.767 EW5,233 ",at%
Federal and Stale Construction Gmlrts 0 0 0 0.00%
Conduction F. 1,068,000 730.162 327.836 69,01%
Other Fees 23.515,000 10,473,895 13,041,104 44.54%
Sale of Capacity Rights 461.00) 0 441.000 0.00%
Intereet S Mhc Romipts 8,3661000 4,094095 4,271,905 48.94%
Other 0 0 0 0,00%
Total R9y0e.Us 44,209old, 30,+61,929 24,047,080 46.61%
Tohl Revenue&Beginning Sahncne 224,059,808
E%PENORURES:
Sham of Jobt,Works Tent Plaid S Resewas W '437,000 5.370439 w.NSJR2 8.89%
District Trunk Sewer Coned.SReeerves 2,167,000 128043 2,046,957 5.54%
Bond Retiramem and lnueeest Expense 24,288,000 3,3049111 20,981,039 73.61%
Sham of Joint Worim Odelsting Expenses 15192e.000 6,415,044 9,512,958 40.28%
Provided for Reimbutwment Agreemama 0 0 0 0.00%
ONMI l Opened.,S OMer Upiunihres 5,359,000 973,786 4,384,214 18,17%
Toil EapendiWme 108,+T),000 +8,+88,222 91,98+,T23 14.96%
Ending Fund Balances 207,074,134
Facilities Expansion
Baarme AdlueOmmda TrUnaferto Behowe
211193 aAddiOona Flaed Aeeei 1=1193
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
344-2 Lampoon lnhmephr Sevier 3y53 T.035 10.291
325 Onnge-Weehm Sub-Tmnk Relief Sewer 49,NO 49.000
Agency Owned Manhole 24 24
11-17$letsr Ppi Upgrade-3&11 125,13E 5,246 130,384
Seal Beach PIS YFO Upgrade 5 5
Tactical Pipe Replacement 160,658 6,161 16Q917
343BR Repl.Woatminster Ave.FOtce Mein 16,783 89.502 106,285
347 IS Widening Project 2013 7.529 7.735
3.38 MIIler4mlder Trunk Sower lmpmvemenh 0 4,578 4,ST8
Mleeellaneous Ch.,.to Closed W.O. 0 (B) (8)
SubTotal 35$.966 inlial 0 476.011
Sham of Joint Would; 41.M.S52 5.370,438 (16,407.632) 30.292,358
Sub-Toil 41,]29,862 5,370,438 (16,407,632) 30,292,361
COMPLETED PROPERTY PLANT B EQUIP,,
Land and PnpeM Rights 2E0,231 280,231
Collection Lines and Pump Sbm. 5;025,591 62,025,591
Treatment FaMIMn %M 9.922
Disposal FeellMee 28,410 26,419
General Plan and Admin.paid. 311.088 311.98E
Equity In Joint Treatment F¢II, 179,814.281 (TSA88) 16,407,632 196,143A15
Othm Assets at Coal Lose Armlet, 7J12T (2A10) 4.217
Tohl Pmporty Plant S Equip. 284,162,959 SAI 9,/T3 0 269.57L132
Coumy Sarmatian Olson"No.5
r Summary Quarterly F4unclal Ropon
6 hfmm s Ended IWIM
BudaMRevilw
• flat-N Remaining Yaar o to
Budget Year) ate Budget %Expanded
Beginning Fund Balance,July 1 49,955,455
REVENUES:
Tax levy(Bore Fund(.)Only) 0 0 a 0.001(,
Tax Alleeati0nau Subvention,(Sham of 1%) 2.471,OOO 1.110,028 1.361 44.82%
Federal and Stem Conelrucdon Gran6 0 0 0 Mcm
Connection Fees 118.000 14,383 103.617 12.19%
Cther Fees 2,831,000 1.452.570 1,178,4W 5521%
S0le of Capacity RI9Me al.00O 0 61.000 0.00%
hummed B eke Recoipla 1,5621000 985,161 M.M9 61.79%
Other S,O93.00o 0 S.OB3,000 am
Total Revenues 11,906A00 3,642,m2 8.393,858
Total Revenue S Beginning Balances 63,497,597
EXPENDITURES:
Share of Jolts Woft Tram.Plant d Reserves 7,117,000 669,614 6447.386 04194
Disom Trunk Sewer Career.S Reserve 4,695,000 2,698.322 2,006,878 ST.26%
Bond Retremem and Internet Expense 4,664,000 $33,803 3.830.197 17.88%
Share M Joint Warke Operating Evaree 1,601.000 859052 761,948 SIMA
Provided for Reimbursement Agreements fall 0 109.030 am%
District Openting S Other Expenditures 804,000 374,259 429741 0.65%
Tool Expenditures 19,0101000 5,425,050 13,184,950 28.54%
Ending Fund Balances 48,072467
Fadaftme Expansion
Sala.. Adjustments Transferto and.
71193 A,AddMons Fixed Amanda 1291193
CONSTRUCT ION IN PROGRESS':
583 Bay Bridge PIS lmpa 822M R4,567 1.147.373
Sliplino BaybMge Force Main E1 BR-2 1.022 t.on
leer.McMtal S*Mh*@ Uft PIS 108 108
S 6 So.Covet Trunk Sewal4nnd Plumes 182 "S'a5T 1105,121 1,963,978
546 Cr tel Cove PIS 158,416 390,455 540.871
S34 Bayeid.Dr.Trunk Sewer Impr.Phi.1,253 5.099.99I 99,795 5,199,789
5 Co,0.1 Mar PIS BAD 8.4P
Lido PIS a2 Me Upgrade 25.8M - 25,870
TechBe Pipe Replacement 2.414 2,414
Mlecallammus Charges to Closed W.O. 0 248 248
541 Coast Highway FDroO Sam RePlacemrd 5 8 6 AT75 183 5.938
S412 Bitter PI S Rocky N P9lmprov.5 S 6 250,540 113A81 364,021
547.1M Ropl.Plan 4015 S 6 Z710 2716
5474164 PCR Gravity Sun Rehab 5 S 6 188,655 574,492 763.157
S 9Siphon5S6 895.1m 695.190
Sub�Tohl 81040,8110 2,6BB,122 0 10,7291122
Shmeol J.Inl Works 5.180.180 009.614 (2,045,788) 3,TTTP00
S.b TOhI CIS&190 m9,614 (4045,788) 31T1T,006
COMPL D PROPERTY PLANT B EQUIP,
Land ant Property Rights B,231 6,231
Collection Llne and Pump Sms. 22,802.921 22 602,921
TnaVnent Facilities 7.347 7,349
DlepoW Facilities 7.115 7.115
General Plant and Admin.Feel. 2T.347 27,147
Equity In Joint Treatment Facll. 22,018.508 422,345 2,045,788 24p04,641
Other Amele at Cost Lea AMOM 72,594 (13.736) M.858
Total Property Plant S Equip. 57,934,043 Sy68,545 0 61,7095118
County Sentence;Olaetot No.6
Summary DuamMy Financial Report
6 Months Ended 1WIM3
Budget Review
1993-e4 Remalnfag Yffiff Date
Budget yoar40-Data Budget %Experded
Beginning Fund Balances,July 1 31,801,795
REVENUES:
Tea Lrvy(Bond Fund(.)Only) 0 0 0 0OW.
Tea Allocationslsubventmns(Share of l%) 1,491.000 564.485 926,515 37.86%
Federal end Stets Cameacllan Gramme 0 a 0 0.00%
Connection Fees 235,000 19,092 215.938 8.11%
Omer Fare 3,377,000 1,712,459 1.854.531 50.71%
Sale of Capacity Rights 76,000 0 76.000 0.00%
Internet&Miss.Receipts 1,315,000 599.472 715.520 45.59%
C mr 1.150.000 0 1,150.00O 0,00%
Total Revenues 7,644,000 2,895,488 4,748,512 37116%
Total Revenue&Beginning Balances 34,697,263
ENPENORUFES:
Share of Joint Works Tmd.Plant&Reserves 11.374.000 891.120 10,402.B72 7,83%
District Tmnk Sewer Coney.&Reforms 1,026.000 196,999 1,428,001 12.1n..
Bond Rothmans and Intere0s Expense 3,040,000 370,932 2,669.006 1220%
She.of Joint Wake Omallng Expornoa 2.568.000 1.030.140 1.529.880 40A3%
Provlded for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00%
District Oparegng&Other Expenditures 321,000 86,292 235,708 28.5TY.
Total Expenditures 18,928,000 2,582,491 IsAd6,509 13.64%
Ending Fund Balances 32,114.792
Facilities Expansion
Balance Adjustments Transfers, Be[...
WIM3 &AddMans Fixed Awets 1LN193
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
le-1-1A&8 Gisler lnt,14-14 Baker Street 483.30 7,287 490.653
642 Felmelw Relief 240,267 248.267
"I Coast Highway Forte Mein Replacement 5&6 us 9 354
542 Bitter%&Rocky PS PIS Imprev.6&6 91.121 41,P3 132,304
64TAM Raps.Plan 401 5&6 679 679
5474&4 PCH Gravity San Rehab 5&6 42,35T 148.430 190.787
549 Siphon 6 IS 6 36,589 36.589
Sub-Total e0;Y24 196.509 0 1S99.T23
Sham of Joint Works 8,857,694 091,128 (VZ2.551) 5,026,471
Sub-Total 9S5T,894 891,128 (2,722,551) 5,026,471
CO 1 E/ED PROPERTY PLANT&EOUIP
Lend and Property Rights 5B2 %2
Collection Linea and Pump Sets. 1,788,61M 1.700.866
Treatment Facilities 2,853 2,653
Disposal Faclift ee 7,3e4 7,394
General Plant and Admin.Facll. 93,421 23,421
Equity In Joint Treatment Focll. 28,883.984 155,411 2.722,551 31,761.946
Omer Assets at Coat Loss AMOM 37.117 (7,050) 30P67
Total Property Plant&Equip. 38554,615 1,236,488 0 39,791,102
County SenNtlen OYWch No.I
' summary OuertMy gnuNx Rapun
d MonW Fndp I"IM
ender Realew
e t993-M Ruu1nA9 yaaay b
Budd" Yurbdala Budpx YEgended
Be9thnli5 Fund Balances.July t p,ry].Y19
REVENUES
Tul (Gland Fundla)Only) 0 0 0 am
TUAllecedOnsSUWanacns(Slunolt%I 3.355.000 1.a913BG 18YJ.)W M15%
Federal and Slim ConsWNon Gn+nM 0 0 0 am
Gommatbn Fax I1e.000 192.701 ({6.)01) 137,M
ONx Fax 5252,000 2.859.591 3,128A09 45.95%
Sale 01 C.'uh,.,h. 99.000 0 W.OW am
I..,6N0.R..IM S.]M.OM 1191 1.890.557 50.1m
ONar 95.O1XI 0 95,000 0.00%
Total R.-..- 12,823,000 s,Nhi 9A]1,9)1
Tonal Revenue S Badlnnln9 Bslencas p.Tit.2M
E.YP�NOINRES:
Shen of Joint Web Tut Plan)S Anti 15,785.000 1d7]]9 14.557.08 7.
Obtrlx Trvnk Sewer Cxub.S Resh. 3.992.000 1351XB 2.)15]44 91J1%
Bend ReOnment erN had.Ea0enee 5,2IBM 174295 aA93.719 KIM
Shenof Jelni Wob Opratlnpliana s 3.161A00 IAt.005 1,9T1M 852%
PreHded for RxmEusemxR AgmemsnM 0 0 0 000%
OwMt Operating A Mar Eapen0ldrs 1.299A00 MIN 1A99918 YM%
TOYI EspndlWm M=hcoo 9AMA2] ]tN1A2T IUM
Endlnp Fund Balancer U.719.m
FarJWx EapsnaM
Balance AaQ`pgm hu TnvMx BaNnn
7AM Sandhi FtrW Aexb IVII.
CONS 2RlICROIJ M PROWESS:
2-22 PenIW 9 ROL Umun Nelphla N) 2.201 2851
72.1-1C ai Aim.Pump Sin R,l Fmu NFNg B51 fOAN 11,614
)Aa Ompe Perk Acm Sever Study 8.813 e9.550 93.353
T.2a.1,plo A.MWM 0 317 317
T-O Cowan hda hb sever 37.715 5.3M 0.131
McWwIMSMtronvantllatlOn OMmile o 2.10 9.10
7.7-1 Main Spit PS 12M 9339 19.633
Manhole Ad)usbnenin Re.Onppe CeulNy 0 208 209
I&I IS S B Gbkr lnt,14LI-2 Baker SMt
FOme MCMObukb9,T51a 1.035,813 19A92 I.M.95
2A1.1.2.I AOanunmut ud Mad".W PS 1.74224 Sal 1.742.601
SwrMW Faxmentlndn B00ka 1329T 13=
Tna ACeMen9lial 15] 295,9M a0.557 MASS
261-I Sun9owallM 18.70 219 18,992
2.19 Lmron Neylhas sewer 52.092 5),M2
Main Spit Flux Ladder 151 22a 335
7-1-1 GUMXRedMY Tiunk Adndevnem 2,232 22M
Taub"RePlacemaM a9427 1.897 4'.120
Y]O Navy Way PS AhudOnmant 99=3 0I.791 1,091A10
7-17 Orange Park Acm Sswwr ROL M loS 10.911
7-1&2 Oelhl Chanxl Siphon n.933 (41.743) 32190
)n Bd Panic Arthur Trwk A )0214 111.41111 181.705
Nervam Ava.Tunk SWmr 1,MM2 I=tfiat
Mlacellanaox Clough,to Clxad WA. 1,S59 2S I.M
SutrTeMl SA21M7 1.291A89 0 9633.203
Shan 01 JeMt Wob o"'.341 1202314 O,8MA19) 8.810.15/
SUATxx 8291.H1 1207239 (]AtlA18) SA10A67
E EO EW
Lend and Property Rlphaa Z)B a51 376.45a
CObNon Wx aM Pump SW. 31295.)1) 31285.]1)
TMM@nt FealWan 0 0
Olepoul F=Kl. 10,792 10]02
Wnenl FlntaM Admin.path. 78M1 79,M1
Equity In Jain Tmxmex Faun. 39515281 (49833) 3A99.819 U'.I54,099
Mar....el Cost Lees Amwt W02 02M) 21.308
TOMl pmpeM Plant S Equip. 85ASOAM ;2B9A13 0 M289,)ae
i
County Sen8e0on Disbad No.11 r
Summary Quarterly Financial Report
6MonMSErmed129f93
Budget Review t
1993-94 Remebdat, Yaar4 dlx,
Budget Yen-W ace Budget %Bemused
Beginning Fund Balances,July 1 80g0&848
REVENUES,
Tte Levy(Bond Forestal Only) 15,000 7,197 7,803
Tax AllotsOonsl3ubventlone(Blmm of l%) 2.133,000 939,612 1,19$368 44.05%
Federal anti Seale ConsWctm.Grams 0 0 0 0.00%
Connection Fees 353,000 76.550 n(i 21.99%
Mar Fees 3,694,000 1O53,3116 2,040,834 «.TB%
Sme of Capacity Rights 83.000 0 "000 0.00%
Interest O Mlec.R.00pts 2,2n.000 g80,355 1,205,545 43.4904
Mar 0 0 0 0.0016
Total Revenue. 8,6551000 3.07,000 00719" CL88%
Total Revenue&Beginning Balances 58,875,726
E)1PENA91IRES:
Sham of Joint Worse Teat Plant 8 Reserve. 12,880,000 1,017,W8 11,942,052 7.85%
District Trunk Sewn COVR.B Reserves 1,050,000 37.389 7.012,811 0.0%
Bond Retirement and Interest Expanse 4.490.000 515096 3,W4,SW 11.42%
Share 01 J0int Worts Operating Exteues 31190,000 1,461 1.721,067 46.05%
Provided for Relmburmormit Agraem.mts 0 0 0 0O0%
District Opera0e,5OMer Expendtiun. 935,000 26111184 574,816 n.83%
Total ExpandlMme U16415,000 3,09,560 25.325ASO 11.0%
Ending Fund Balances 56,576,178
Facilities Extension
Betsnte Adjuatrneme Tmnelereo Balance
Tilm BAGSMOns F4ad Assets 1213193
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
11-17 Slater PJS Sewage Sys lmprov. 747,285 28.951 n6236
X.B.Wetlands Conserver Wetiam Career 0 8,438 8A38
Sub-Tool W.288 37.389 0 TB4,674
Sham 0l JOlnt World, 7,833,875 1,017,948 (3,110,010) 5,741O13
Sub-Total 7,833,075 1,017,948 (3,110,010) 9,741,813
COMPLETED PROPERTY.PLANT 5 EQUIP:
Lend and Property Rights 148,988 148086
Collection Linea and Pump Stan. 19,011,15E 19,011,158
Treetmem Facilities 0 0
Disposal Facllmes 3.053 3,053
General Plant and Admin.Face. 28.698 28,699
Equity In Joint Treatment Fecll. 33,214.009 (71,273) 3.110.010 36.262,746
Mar Assam at Cost Lou Arrant. 0 0
Total Property Plant B Equlp. 61,016,065 is"c4 0 61,988,129
COMOr SenhaVon DisWa No.13
Summery Ouenerry,Financial Report
6 Momhd,Ended 1WIM3
Budget Revlee,
1993-M Remaining YeerAo ate
Budgat Year-1o43am Budget %Expandetl
Beginning Fund Balances,July 1 17,050,560
REVENUES:
Tax L vy 41 oad Fund(&)Only) 0 0 a 0.00%
Tv Allnpatioasl8u0venUon&(Share of 1%) 0 0 0 0.00%
Federal and SMe Conservation Gmens 0 0 0 0.001K,
Connection Fee& 470,000 485,300 4,700 am%
Other Fees 732,000 W.V4 36T,T28 49.78%
Selo of Capacity Rights 9000 0 9,000 0.00%
Interest 6 Mlec.Recelpts 890,000 404,1T2 265,828 58.50%
Other 0 0 0 am
Total Revenues 1,901,000 1,2d3,746 86y,251 64.90%
Tend Revenue 6 Beginning Balances 12,092,308
EXPENDITURES:
Sham of Jolts Works Treat.Plant 6 Reserves 3,462,000 13SZ78 2,320,724 5.49%
OtsUict Trunk Seven Corona.&Reserved, O73,000 0 473,000 0.00%
Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 28,000 4.097 23.903 14,63%
Share of Joint Woks Operating Expenses 442,000 229)81 212.219 51.99%
PrevidW for Relmhureemant Agreements 0 0 0 0.00%
DIBMcI Opemdng&Met Expenditures 109.000 34.410 74,590 31.51"K
Total Espenade. 3,514,000 403,564 3,110,4.36 11.48%
Ending Fund Balances 18,606,742
FaclllEw Expansion
Bills.. Adfumbrems Transform Belsnpe
7I1193 6Addltlmu Fixed Nasals 1ZIJ1193
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGBESS:
Shamof Jalnt Works 1.041,040 135.278 (413.291) 763.031
Sub-Toml 1,W1Na8 135,276 (413,291) 763,031
COMPLRTED PROPERTY.P"AT 6 EDUIP:
Lend and PmsmY Rights 0 0
Collection Lines and Pump Sees. 2,285,357 2.205,357
Treatment Faclll ive 0 0
Disposal Facilities 0 0
General Plant and Atlanta.Fecil. 0 0
Equtiy In Johd Tmannem Facil. 4,481,576 (143.558) 413,291 4.751.309
Other Ad,&oM at Cont Lod,Amon 0 0
Total Properly Place 6 Equip, 7,807.979 (8.282) 0 7,799,697
Cpumy SanlleVoo Dlanic(No.14 s
Summery chain"Financial Roporr
6 Manville Ended fY]193
Budget Revlew
1993-ns Remaining Year4oOsts
Budget Yaar4o43au Budget %Expanded
Beginning Fund Bounces,July 1 63ASg512
REVENUES:
The Lm,(Bond Fondle)Only) 0 0 0 0.00%
The Alloce6ons/Sabamltlona(Share of l%) 0 0 0 Bop%
Federal and Stale Comstumom Emma 0 0 0 0.00%
IRWD Foxe 16.400,0001 5,072.524 11,327.476 30.03%
Other Face 0 1047 (I.MT) 0.00101.
Sale of Capacity Rights 811000 0 81000 0.00%
In,eraet&Misc.Racelpts 383,000 109.930 273,070 2aIM
Other 0 0 0 0.00%
Totel Revenues 16,864,000 61183,601 11,680,469 30.04%
Total Favemue 6 Beginning Balanced 68AS4,013
EXPENDITURES:
Sham of Joint WOMB Tmlt Pun,&Reserves 12.764,000 1,oX.058 11749.142 &Ci
District Trunk Sewer C natr.&Firearms 4.675.000 55.914 4.819,088 1.15%
Bond Re0remam and Induced Exceeds 165,000 24,103 14O097 14,61%
Shire of Join,Woft OpamOng Expanses 11546.000 413.56I 1132,M 2815%
Provided for Reimbursement Agmsmen,d 0 0 0 0.00%
District Operedng&Omer Expenditures 450,000 87,10 302015 14.23%
Total Expendtmrae IDA20400 IJ195,624 18.224,376 BAM4
Ending Fund B tarced 66,818,3B9
Fastigiate Expansion
Balance Adjua0nsrds Traedurto Balance
711M &AddMons Flied Assets 12A193
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS:
U"cfty Purchase from DUMcta E&6 4.015 6W 4.622
Main Street Flume Flowmmer 2.544 2.544
14-1-1 A Is B Gluier Int.,141.2 Baker St
Forte Mein,DisWc46,7&14 2815.OB5 42,740 2.657.805
Main St Pump Station Improvements 7-T-1 0&TSt 12,557 01,298
Sub-Toal 289DA66 61,914 0 2746,269
Sham of Join,WOMB 7.964.008 1.054.858 (3,161,672) 5,837,192
Su4Tetsl TA81,098 1A54A6B (S,t81,8f2) 5,037.192
COMPLETED PROPERTY PLANT 4 EQUIP'
I ndl and Pmpedy Rights 0 0
Collection Urea and Pump Sh16 16.631.400 10.531,488
Treatment Facilities 0 0
Disposal FacllBus 0 0
General Plant and Admin.Fec11. 0.742 6.747
Equity In Joint Truman Fecll. M,W,132 (lW,]Atl 3.181,672 36.422.548
Other Assets at Cost Lees Airport- 0 0
Total Property Plant Equip. 60.NT,H3 M,611 0 611644,244
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
01 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 1° E.15.�N°E
00 80X 8127
FW WAiN MLEY,CALFORNIA 9272&81 27
February 23, 1994
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: February 23, 1994 - 5,30 p.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Director George Brown
Charles E. Puckett Vice Joint Chairman Director George L. Zlaket
A. B. "Buck" Catlin Past Joint Chairman John Shaw, General Counsel's Office
Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Daniel Spradlin, General Counsel's Office
Fred Barrera Chairman, District 1
John Collins Chairman, District 2 STAFF PRESENT:
Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3
John C. Cox, Jr. Chairman, District 5 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Barry Hammond Chairman, District 7 Blake P. Anderson, Director of Technical
Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Services
Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering
Roger Stanton County Supervisor Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel
William Steiner County Supervisor Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of
Maintenance
Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of
Operations
ABSENT:
John M. Gullixson Chairman, District 13
1) Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations.
The Fiscal Policy Committee met on February 16 and considered several items
of business. Enclosed is a report (green) of the Committee's meeting and
recommended action items, summarized as follows:
Report of the Executive Committee
February 23, 1994
Independent Professional Audit Services.
The Boards have engaged KPMG Peat Marwick to provide independent
professional auditing services for the Districts. KPMG's three-year contract
expired with the completion of the 1992-93 audit, which was approved by the
Boards at the Mavember 10, 1993 meeting.
Because of KPMG's major involvement in an upcoming separate independent
auditing effort for the Districts, and the current development and conversion to
a new financial management and information system which was approved by
the Boards on February 9, 1994, the Fiscal Policy Committee recommended
that the Boards authorize it to negotiate a one-year extension of KPMG Peat
Marwick's agreement for annual audit services for the 1993-94 fiscal year.
(The 1992-93 fee was $55,700.) The negotiated.agreement will be returned
to the Directors for consideration at a future meeting.
The Fiscal Policy Committee further recommends that for the 1994-95 fiscal
year audit,the staff be directed to solicit proposals for a multi-year engagement
beginning with 1994-95 from the "Big Six" accounting firms, and any other
qualified accounting firm that has submitted a request to be included, for
consideration by the Fiscal Policy Committee.
Executive Committee Recommendation.
The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendations of the Fiscal
Policy Committee.
Supervisor Stanton requested that his vote in opposition to the recommended
action be made a matter of record.
2) Evaluation of Water Quality Element of SCAG's Reaional Comprehensive Plan.
Staff reported that in December, the Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG) issued a draft of its Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP).
One of the 15 chapters deals with water quality which includes wastewater
management.
Using the enclosed (tan) outline, the staff reviewed its evaluation of SCAG's
RCP Water Quality Chapter (also see enclosed salmon Staff Report). It
2
Report of the Executive Committee
February 23, 1994
summarizes SCAG's RCP Water Quality Element and recommended language
changes to the plan to minimize its impact on our ability to plan and construct
needed wastewater facilities to serve increasing service demands and comply
with more stringent regulatory requirements.
During the discussion of the issue of regional water quality management, there
was a great deal of concern expressed by members of the Executive Committee
about SCAG taking on additional discretionary authority that is presently not
vested in SCAG. Most of the members that expressed an opinion said that
SCAG review and oversight regarding public policy affecting the Sanitation
Districts land other wastewater treatment agencies) should be limited to the
least involvement possible and only where federal participation is applicable.
They expressed a significant degree of reservation about any review authority
by SCAG over the Sanitation Districts' facilities planning and construction
programs, believing that the interests of the members of the public within our
service area can be best represented and served by our Boards of Directors.
With the exception of the very narrow and specific mandates of the Clean Air
Act and the Clean Water Act, there was little support for SCAG providing
oversight or review of the Sanitation Districts' facilities planning and
construction efforts. The Committee believes that SCAG's review and rewrite
of the RCP Water Quality Chapter should be accomplished within this context.
Executive Committee Action.
The Executive Committee authorized the staff to submit proposed RCP Water
Quality Chapter language changes to SCAG as set forth in the enclosed
(salmon) February 16, 1994 (Revised) Staff Report on pages 12-15.
3) Closed Session Re Litigation and/or Personnel Matters.
The Committee convened in closed session to consider matters pertaining to
current meet-and-confer negotiations with Districts' employee groups and
matters pertaining to potential litigation.
JWS:eyr
Enclosures
Awpd..b...=2384...
3
I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
February 16,I 1994 AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
' IOW ELLIS AVENUE
PO BOXG127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 927MB127
014)962.2411
REPORT OF THE
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
Meetina Date: February 16, 1994 - 5:30 P.M.
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT:
Charles E. Puckett, Acting Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Don R. Griffin Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
John M. Gullixson Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations
Iry Pickier Dan Dillon, Accounting Manager
William G. Steiner
James A. Wahner
Grace H. Winchell
ABSENT:
Peer A. Swan, Chairman
Evelyn Hart
1. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE MISSION STATEMENT.
At the January meeting, the Committee deferred until February a discussion
of the "mission" of the Committee. The Committee reviewed the following
excerpt from the Boards' adopted "Rules of Procedures for the Conduct of
Business of the Districts," which establish the Fiscal Policy Committee and
its role, and decided that it appropriately described the Committee's current
mission. Director Pickier abstained from the vote.
"13. STANDING COMMITTEES:
(b) FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - There shall be a permanent Fiscal
Policy Committee to advise the staff in matters relative to the financial
and budget policies of the Joint Administrative Organization.
The Committee shall review with staff the procedures for
development, preparation and format of the annual Joint Works
budgets and recommend appropriate changes, and counsel the staff
during the budget process to assure the proper interpretation and
implementation of the Boards' policies and that the desired procedures
have been followed.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 2
February 16, 1994
The Committee is not responsible for recommending adoption of
proposed budgets to the Executive Committee or the Boards of
Directors. However, the Committee, at its discretion may so
recommend and/or comment on said budgets as deemed appropriate
by its members.
The responsibility for consideration and adoption of the respective
individual District budgets rests with each individual District Board.
The Fiscal Policy Committee is further authorized to review other
fiscal policy matters of the Joint Administrative Organization, or the
Districts severally or individually, as assigned by the Executive
Committee or Boards, and report findings and recommendations to the
Executive Committee, such as:
- Recommendations of Districts' independent CPA Auditors
- Revenue Program Policies
- Procurement Policies
- Insurance
- Debt Financing Policies
- Other studies and investigations, as requested by the Fiscal Policy
Committee and approved by the Executive Committee
The Committee shall consist of nine Directors appointed by the Joint
Chairman. To the extent possible, the membership shall represent a
cross section of the Districts. It is deemed desirable that at least one
member of the Executive Committee be a member of the Fiscal Policy
Committee.
The Chairman of the Fiscal Policy Committee shall be appointed by
the Joint Chairman.
The Fiscal Policy Committee shall meet at the call of its Chairman."
2. PROFESSIONAL AUDIT SERVICES.
The last three-year independent audit services agreement with KPMG Peat
Marwick expired with completion of the 1992-93 audit which was approved
by the Boards at the November 10, 1993 meeting. Accordingly, staff
sought Committee guidance regarding professional audit services for fiscal
year 1993-94.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 3
February 16, 1994
Some of the options the Committee considered were:
1. To seek bids from the "Big Six" audit firms.
2. To seek bids from all firms except KPMG.
3. To negotiate a one-year extension with KPMG for fiscal year
1993-94.
4. To negotiate a multi-year extension with KPMG.
The Committee agreed that auditors are required to gain and document an
understanding of a government's internal control structure as part of the
audit planning process, and that this process is especially costly in the first
year of an audit because the auditors are becoming acquainted with and
documenting the internal control structure for the first time. A multi-year
audit contract, such as the one just concluded, has the advantage of
allowing auditors to recover these and similar start-up costs over a longer
period of time, and so can lead to lower overall audit costs. Also, multi-year
audit contracts can help to create needed continuity in the audit process.
The Committee also reviewed mandatory rotation of auditors. Those in
favor of the concept often refer to the need for "new blood" and a "fresh
perspective." On the other hand, others typically cite the benefits of
"continuity" and "experience." Under current professional standards
applicable to auditors, there is no ethical limitation on the number of
consecutive years that an auditor may continue to audit a given client.
The Committee and staff agreed that a policy of rotating auditors is
desirable. However, staff reported to the Committee that there are some
special circumstances this year, including the recent hiring of KPMG to
perform a focused review of the Districts' internal control policies and
practices. This review is expected to begin in April 1994, and will overlap
with the customary preliminary annual audit activities for 1993-94.
Further, Deloitte & Touche was selected at the last Board meeting to provide
professional consulting services for the needs assessment and RFP
preparation in connection with the selection of a new financial information
system. The Districts' Accounting Manager will serve as the Districts'
project manager for this very important process. Staff and Deloitte &
Touche have projected significant involvement of the project manager in
order to successfully complete this project. As one of the Accounting
Manager's other major responsibilities is the annual outside audit, the
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 4
February 16, 1994
combination of the time required to select a new financial information
system and to orient a new auditing firm unfamiliar with the Districts, may
overtax available staff resources. Staff, therefore, recommended option No.
3 above.
Committee Recommendation
After consideration of all of the above, the Fiscal Policy Committee
recommends:
A. Staff be authorized to solicit a proposal from KPMG Peat Marwick,
and to negotiate with them for a one-year extension of the expired
agreement for professional audit services to conduct the 1993-94
annual audit. The proposal would be returned to the Directors for
consideration at a future meeting.
B. Staff solicit proposals from other "Big Six" audit firms, and others that
have asked to be included, for a multi-year engagement beginning in
1994-95 for consideration at a later Committee meeting.
3. TRAINING. TRAVEL AND MEETING EXPENSE REVIEW.
In July, the Boards reaffirmed the Districts' training, travel and meeting
expense policy and asked staff to prepare a quarterly report of expenses for
the Fiscal Policy Committee's review.
Accordingly, the Committee reviewed the second quarterly report covering
the first six months of 1993-94. In addition to the Joint Operating (JO)
expenses, travel to inspect equipment fabrication for a capital project and
the initial training required for a new facility may be appropriately capitalized
and charged to that project and, accordingly, such costs are paid through
the respective capital fund, generally the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund
(CORF). These charges were also included in the report.
4. SIX-MONTH 1993-94 BUDGET REVIEW.
The Committee reviewed the enclosed summary statements of the Joint
Works Operating Costs (JO [light green]), the Joint Works Capital
Improvement Program (CORF [yellow]), and the costs of the workers'
compensation (pink), public liability (salmon) and health plan (goldenrod)
self-insurance funds for the first six months of fiscal year 1993-94.
With one-half of the year gone, 45.6% of the net joint operating budget has
been expended. Net costs are down $790,802 or 3.4%, compared with the
same period last year. Line item cost increases are primarily due to
November 1992 MOU adjustments, for a net salaries and benefits increase
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 5
February 16, 1994
of $647,165; increased odor and sulfide control chemical costs of
$361,012; increased research environmental monitoring of $243,765; and
additional natural gas costs of $769,604. More than offsetting operational
savings have been realized from the operation of the Central Power
Generation Facilities resulting in a decrease of $2,433,738 for purchased
electrical power. Smaller increases or decreases in other categories make up
the balance of net costs. At the same time, flows have decreased 2.9%.
Therefore, the net decrease in costs offset by the decreases in flows have
resulted in a $2.44 per million gallons decrease in the unit cost to treat and
dispose of sewage, to $550.41 per million gallons.
Joint Works construction project costs for the first three months are lower
than originally scheduled, running at 24% of the 1993-94 budget, or $16.9
million. Several projects have been recently awarded or are scheduled to be
awarded in the near future, and progress payments on these projects will
increase the CORF outlay over the remainder of the year.
5. REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT PROGRAM MONITORING.
The Boards have authorized staff to enter into two six-month $50 million
reverse repurchase agreements using the services of the County Treasurer's
office. The net arbitrage earnings from these two transactions over the next
six months will be $838,496.
At the January Committee meeting staff reported on how these two reverse
repurchase agreements are being monitored. Staff monitors the price of
these two FNMA securities using the on-line Bloomberg financial system
authorized by the Boards, and periodically reviews the program with the
County Treasurer.
Staff reported that as of February 16, 1994, the value of each security was
as shown in the following table. Although the securities are valued at a
discount in the current interest rate environment, they will earn the coupon
interest until maturity and need not be sold at a loss.
I.D.No. Reversal Rate Rollover Coupon Market Price
31364AYT3 3.25% 04/28/94 5.10% 99181ti
31364AH62 3.30% 05/02/94 4.94% 9911/32
6. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN DAILY EFFORT (PRIDE).
The Committee reviewed several PRIDE suggestions that staff had submitted
for consideration and evaluation. Certificates and cash awards totaling
$2,218.40, in accordance with the Board-approved PRIDE program, are
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 6
February 16, 1994
summarized in the enclosed staff report (lavender). These four PRIDE
proposals are estimated to save the Districts approximately $20,184.00
annually.
7. FUTURE MEETING DATES.
One of the Fiscal Policy Committee's major responsibilities is to oversee the
preparation of the Joint Works Operating and Capital Budgets. These
budgets are presented to the Executive Committee in May of each year.
Historically, the Fiscal Policy Committee has met monthly during the Joint
Works Budget preparation process. Accordingly, Committee meetings have
been tentatively scheduled on the standard third Wednesday of each month,
March 16th, April 20th, May 18th; and jointly with the Executive Committee
on May 25, 1994, the fourth Wednesday.
GGS:Ic
aF:J:\W PDGQRMF1'C.FRGIFPC3.8C
Enclosures
2/9/94 JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET REVIEW & SUMMARY
COMPARISON OF BUDGETED & ACTUAL EXPENDITURES
FISCAL YEAR TO DATE 1993-94
(A) (8) ICI (D) (E) (F) 1G)
Budget Expenditures Expenditures Increase % Increase % Budget Remaining
1993-94 through through or (Decrease) Realized Budget
12/31/93 12/31/92 (Decrease)
1. Net Salaries, Wages & Benefits $26,170,000 $12,411,953 $11,764,788 $647,165 5.50 % 47.43 % $13,758,047
2. Odor Control & Chemical Coagulants 4,154,000 1,537,018 1,372,055 164,963 12.02 % 37.00 % 2,616,982
3. Contractual Services 6,702,000 3,442,016 3,377,748 64,268 1.90 % 51.36 % 3,259,984
4. Professional Services 904,000 319,532 382,838 (63,306) (16.54)% 35.35 % 584,468
5. Equipment Charges. 235,000 108,016 112,382 (4,366) (3.88)% 45.96 % 126,984
6. Repair & Maintenance
Materials & Services. 3,870,000 1,685,688 1,779,693 (94,005) 15.28)% 43.56 % 2,184,312
7. Research & Monitoring• 3,431,000 1,380,159 1,136,394 243,765 21.45 % 40.23 % 2,050,841
8. Utilities. 3,650,000 1,783,918 3,270,475 (1,486,5571 (45.45)% 48.87 % 1,866,082
9. Other Materials, Supplies
& Outside Services. 3,963.000 1,679,989 1,820,811 (140,8221 (7.73)% 42.39 % 2,283,011
10. Total Joint Operating Expenses $53,079,000 $24,348,289 $25,017,184 ($668,895) (2.67)% 45.87 % $28,730,711
11. Revenues & Offsets. (3,500,000) (1,758,042) (1,636,135) (121,907) 7.45 % 1 50.23 % 1 (1,741,958)
12. NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE $49,579,000 $22,590,247 $23,381,049 ($790,802) 13.38)% 45.56 % $26,988,753
13. Gallonage Flow (MG) 89,421.48 41,042.32 42,291.81 (1,249.49) 12.95)% 45.90 %
14. Gallonage Flow (MGD) 244.99 223.06 229.85 (6.79) 12.95)%
15. Gallonage Charge IS's/MGI $554.44 $550.41 $
552.85 ($2.44) (0.441%
FPCR1293.XLS 9:36 AM
2n/94 PAGE
JOINT OPERATING FUND & WORKING CAPITAL FUND
SUMMARY BUDGET REVIEW
6 MONTHS ENDED 12.31-93
A B C D E F G H
EXP EXP %EXP INCR INCR
BUDGET THRU BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING (DECRI (DECR)
DESCRIPTION 1992-93 12-31-92 1993-94 12-31-93 12.31-93 BUDGET 9 %
SALARIES.WAGES. &BENEFITS
1 SALARIES&WAGES 27.043,000 13,139,140 30,053.000 14.524,896 48.33 15,528,104 1,385,756 10.55
2 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS:
3 RETIREMENT 3,050,000 929,290 2,044,000 888,878 43.49 1,155,122 (40,412) (4.35)
4 WORKERS COMP 225,000 112,501 225,000 112,501 50.00 112,499 0 0.00
5 UNEMPLOYMENT INS 65,000 33,027 75.000 12,810 16.81 62,390 (20,417) (61.82)
6 GROUP INSURANCE 2,166,000 1,815,804 3,873,000 1,734,939 44.80 2,138,061 (80,865) (4.45)
7 UNIFORM RENTAL 100,000 36,234 100.000 29,835 29.84 70,165 (6,399) (17.66)
8 TOTAL BENEFITS 5,W6,000 2,926,856 6,317,000 2,778,763 43.99 3,538,237 (148,093) (5.06)
9 SALARIES,WAGES,&BENEFITS 32,649,000 16,065,996 36,370,000 17,303,659 47.58 19.066.341 1.237.663 7.70
10 W.O.SALARIES &BEN.ALLOC.:
11 DIRECT CHARGES-CORF/DIST (4,800.000) (2,403,812) (5,500,000) 12,631,758) 47.86 (2.868,2421 (227,946) 9.48
12 COST ALLOC-CORF/DIST (3,950.000) (1,897.396) (4,700,000) (2,259,948) 48.08 (2,440,052) (362,652) 19.11
13 W.O.SALARIES &BENEFITS (8,750,OW) (4,301,208) (10.200,000) (4,891,706) 47.96 (5,308,294) 1590,49M 13.73
14 NET J.O. PAYROLL 23,899,000 11,704788 26,170.000 12411,953 47.43 13.758,047 647,165 5.50
MATERIALS.SUPPLIES. &SERVICES
15 GASOLINE. DIESEL&OIL 225,000 $3.726 220,000 91,070 41.40 128,930 7.344 8.77
15 INSURANCE 1,190,000 490.700 1,165,000 537,138 46.11 627,862 46,438 9.46
17 MEMBERSHIPS 58,000 28,784 58,000 28,945 49.91 29,055 161 0.56
18 OFFICE EXPENSE-SUPPLIES 165,000 79,040 175,000 69,873 39.93 105,127 (9,167) 111.60)
19 OFFICE AUTOMATION 0 38,000 105,000 57,984 55.22 47,016 19,984 52.59
20 OFFICE EXPENSE- OTHER 110,000 46.087 115,000 56,092 48.78 58,908 10.005 21.71
21 OPERATING SUPPLIES:
22 CHLORINE&ODOR CONTROL 2,171,000 623,950 1,942,000 793,708 40.87 1,148,292 169,758 27.21
23 SULFIDE CONTROL 660,000 80,120 434.000 271,374 62.53 162,626 191,254 238.71
24 CHEMICAL COAGULENTS 1,649,000 667,985 1,778,000 471,936 26.64 1,306,064 (196,049) (29.35)
25 LAB CHEMICALS &SUPPLIES 400,000 323.347 550.000 247.683 45.03 302,317 (75,664) (23.40)
26 TOOLS 125,000 35,924 115,000 56,994 49.56 58,006 21,070 58.65
27 SOLV,PAINTS, &JAN.SUPPLIE 190,000 81,155 175,000 67,636 38.65 107,364 113,619) (16.66)
28 OTHER OPERATING SUPPLIES 260,000 139,033 265,000 104,553 39.45 160.447 (34,480) (24.801
29 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES:
30 GROUNDSKEEPING&JANITORIA 80,000 36,972 285,000 113,221 39.73 171,779 76,249 206.23
31 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES 175,000 29,398. 150,000 32,618 21.75 117,382 3,220 10.95
32 SOLIDS REMOVAL 6.110,000 2,889,471 5,540,000 2,779,467 50.17 2,760,533 (110,004) (3.81)
33 OTHER WASTE DISPOSAL 100,000 16,641 75,000 77,060 102.75 (2,060) 60,419 363.07
34 OXYGEN PLANT OPER&MTCE 468,000 218,565 490,000 239,067 48.79 250.933 20.502 9.38
35 OTHER 440,000 186,701 162,000 200,583 123.82 138,5831 13.882 7.44
36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES:
37 GENL,LASOR&SPEC COUNSEL 650,000 239,878 650,000 181,865 27.98 468.136 (68,013) (24.181
38 AUDIT&ACCOUNTING 56,000 69,750 60.000 67.760 112.92 (7,7501 (2,000) (2.871
39 ENGINEERING 150,WO 1,235 53,000 0 0.00 53,000 (1,235) (100.00)
40 OTHER 370,000 71,975 141,000 69,917 49.59 71,083 (2,058) (2.86)
FPC1293.XLS-2n/94-10:02 AM
2094 PAGE 2
JOINT OPERATING FUND &WORKING CAPITAL FUND
SUMMARY BUDGET REVIEW
6 MONTHS ENDED 12-31-93
A B q D E F G H
EXP EXP %EXP INCR INCR
BUDGET THRU BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING (DECK) IDECRI
DESCRIPTION 1992.93 12.31-92 1993-94 12.31-93 12-31-93 BUDGET 8 %
41 PRINTING&PUBLICATION:
42 REPRO-IN-HOUSE 165,000 93.964 190,000 104,905 55.21 85,095 10,941 11.64
43 PRINTING-OUTSIDE 110,000 42,857 85,000 20,345 23.94 64.655 122,512) (52.531
44 PHOTO PROCESSING 35.000 15,791 35,000 17,488 49.97 17.512 1.697 10.75
45 NOTICES&ADS 100,000 12,780 35.000 18,183 51.95 16.817 5.403 42.28
46 RENTS&LEASES:
47 OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 110,000 53,470 110.000 51.373 46.70 58,827 42,0971 (3.92)
48 DISTRICT EQUIPMENT RENTAL 125,000 58,912 12510D0 66,843 46.31 68,357 (2,269) (3.851
49 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE:
50 MATERIALS 3,500,000 1,586,510 3,5D0,000 1,409,801 40.27 2.090.399 (175,909) (11.09)
51 CONTRACTS 344,000 194,183 370,000 276,087 74.62 93.913 81.904 42.18
52 RESEARCH&MONITORING:
53 ENVIRO MONITORING 1,946.000 853.288 2,237.000 1,163.339 52.00 1.073,661 310,061 38.34
54 AIR QUALITY MONITORING 0 0 620,000 S00 0.08 619,500 S00 100.00
55 RESEARCH 960,000 283.106 574,000 216.320 37.69 357,680 (66,7861 (23.59)
56 TRAVEL TRAINING &MEETINGS 250,000 82,357 226.000 $7,351 38.82 137,649 4,994 6.06
57 UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS 10,000 20,911 10.00D 11,931) (18.311 11.831 (28,742) (106.W)
58 UTILITIES:
59 DIESEL FOR GENERATORS 200,000 53,201 125,000 40,017 32.01 84,983 (13,184) (24.781
80 POWER 2,473,000 2,997.937 1,100,000 564,199 51.29 535,801 (2,433.7381 (81.181
61 NATURAL GAS 1,284,ODO 53.697 1.900,000 823,301 43.33 1,076,699 769,604 1.433.23
62 TELEPHONE 125,000 30,846 125.000 66,353 53.08 58,647 35,707 116.51
63 WATER 340.000 134.994 400.000 290.048 72.61 109,952 155,054 114.86
64 OTHER EXPENSES:
65 FREIGHT 45,000 20,321 45,000 34,328 76.28 10,672 14,007 68.93
66 GENERAL 450,000 285,374 fi00,0DO 310,692 51.78 289.308 25,318 8.87
57 AOMD OPERATING FEES 325.000 112,821 285,000 39,043 13.70 24S,957 (73,7781 165.39)
68 PRIOR YEARS EXPENSE 100.GD0 (4,954) 50,000 179.280) (158.58) 129.280 (74.326) 1.500.32
69 OTHER NON-OPER EXPENSE 60.000 20.29S 60,OW 31,758 52.93 28,242 11,463 56.48
70 TOTAL MATLS.BUFF,&SERV 28,849,000 13.485,898 27,509,000 12,157,297 44.19 15.351.703 (1.328,601) 19.85)
71 COST ALLOC-CORF&OTHER (600,000) (233.5021 (6DO,000) (220.961) 36.83 (379,039) 12,541 (5.37)
72 NET J.O:MATLS,BUFF,&SERV. 28,249,000 13,252,396 26,909,000 11.936.336 44.36 14,972,664 (1,316,060) (9.931
73 TOTAL J.O. REQUIREMENTS 52,148,000 26,017,184 53.079.000 24,348.289 45.87 28,730.711 (668.895) (2.671
74 LESS: JOINT REVENUES (3,510,000) (1,678,503) (3,510,000) (1,766,S69) SO.33 41,743,431) 4381066) 5.25
75 REVENUE ALLOC-CORFIDIST 10,000 42,368 10,000 8,527 85.27 1.473 (33.8411 (79.87)
76 LESS NET REVENUES (3,500.000) (1.636.135) (3,500,000) (1.758,042) 50.23 (1,741,958) (121,9071 7.45
77 NET J.O. EXPENDITURES 48.648.000 23.381,049 49,579,000 22.590,247 45.56 26,988,753 1 (790,802) (3.38)
FPC1293.XLS-2179410:02 AM
JOINT OPERATING FUND&WORKING CAPITAL FUND
BUDGET REVIEW
6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/93
SUMMARY OF REVENUES
REV REV REV INCR INCR
BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECR) (DECR)
DESCRIPTION 1993.94 12-31-93 12-31-93 BUDGET 12-31-92 $ %
INTER DIST SEWER USE 1,200.000 548,155 45.68 651,845 495,140 53,015 10.71
WASTEHAULER 400,000 242.638 60.66 157.362 190,357 52,281 27.46
IRWD SLUDGE DISPOSAL 1,000,000 404.299 40.43 595.701 395,805 8,494 2.15
WASTE HAULER PENALTIES 10,000 0 0.00 10,000 0 0 0.00
DIGESTER GAS SALES 10,000 0 0.00 10,000 0 0 0.00
SCRAP SALES 10,000 9.752 97.52 248 3,654 6,098 166.89
OTHER SALES 5.000 898 17.95 4.102 681 217 31.79
SLUDGE REUSE 10.000 0 0.00 10.000 2,066 (2,066) -100.00
RENTS& LEASES 100.000 51,500 51.50 48,500 109,933 (58.433) -53.15
CONTRIBUTION IN AID 0 0 100.00 0 150,378 (150,378) -100.00
GENERAL NON-OPERATING 200,000 26,311 13.16 173.689 27.622 (1,311) -4.75
VEHICLE & EQUIP 250,000 114,324 45.73 135.676 113,496 828 0.73
MAILING FEE 5,000 850 17.00 4.150 183 667 364.48
SAMPLING CHARGES 200.000 114,256 57.13 85.744 101.081 13.175 13.03
PRIOR YEAR INCOME 50,000 0 0.00 50,000 0 0 0.00
POWER SALES 50,000 245.059 490.12 195,059 0 245.059 100.00
TOTAL REVENUES 3,500.000 1.758.042 50.23 1,741.958 1,590,396 167,646 10.54
1125194
CSDOC
JOINT OPERATING WORK ORDER SUMMARY
6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31193
6 Months 6 Months 6 Months 5 %
Ended Ended Ended INCR/(DECK) INCR/(DECR)
Dec-91 Dec-92 Dec-93 FROM PR. YEAR FROM PR. YEAR
COLL, DIVER. & INTERPLANT 82,674 94,980 40,740 (54,240) 157.11%)
HEADWORKS 850,525 867,774 843,710 (24,064) (2.77%)
PRIMARY TREATMENT 2,847,216 3,709,362 2,797,875 (911,487) (24.57%)
SECONDARY TREATMENT 1,610,644 1,820,238 1,268,145 (552,093) 130.33%)
SOLIDS HANDLING 3,930,694 4,303,597 4,080,910 (222,687) (5.17%)
EFFLUENT CHLORINATION 98,515 112,127 62,942 (49,185) (43.87%)
EFFLUENT DISPOSAL 793,235 831,568 318,366 (513,202) (61.71%)
SUPERVISORY CONTROL 1,193,495 1,249,834 1,080,851 (168,983) (13.52%)
UTILITY SYSTEMS 1,199,636 1,259,304 2,740,113 1,480,809 117.59%
GENERAL PLANT COMPLEX 1,503,152 2,576,510 2,643,530 67,020 2.60%
ODOR CONTROL 2,143,907 2,003,561 1,952,784 (50,777) (2.53%)
GENERAL ENGINEERING 452,466 481,947 125,268 (356,679) (74.01%)
INDUSTRIAL WASTE 548,318 548,002 428,375 - (119,627) (21.83%)
LABORATORIES & RESEARCH 2,732,695 3,125,622 3,843,753 718,131 22.98%
MOTOR POOL NET CHARGES 197,335 202,852 182,882 (19,970) (9.84%)
ELECTRIC CARTS 95,051 100,677 77,101 (23,576) (23.42%)
PORTABLE EQUIPMENT 88,602 93,094 102,902 9,808 10.54%
TOTAL J. O. EXPENSE 20,368,160 23,381,049 22,590,247 1790,802) (3.38%)
WOSU1293ALS--10:55 AM
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-1
SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 1 of 4
FISCAL YEAR 1993.94
8 MONTHS ENDED 12/31193 Prepared By: Bill Aldridge
(11 (21 (3) (4) (5) (6)
WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED
ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET
199394 1993-94 @ 6/30193 TO 12/31/93 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 -3
A. New and Rebudgeted Mdor Protect.:
1.Westehauier Disp&Sample Stn Pt-27-11213 51942-A,B 305,000 200000 2 2 20000D
Transfer to Projects Below (176,591) (176.591)
Chemical and Wasteheuler Facility Modllne,PI-46 52239-A 1,400,000 142,519 6,817 142.519 149,336 0
Interim Waalehauler Dumping fee,of 46.1 52239 C 217,000 34.072 34.072 34.072 0
2.Secondary Trmt Expansion to 80 MGD,Pt-36 53)1)0 36,222,000 760,000 3.329,262 205,697 3,534,959 544.303
Transfer to Projects Below (35,035) (11,473) 0 111,473)
Electrification of Pump Drives,of-36-1 53717-A 6,318 61318 (6,318)
Secondary Treatment Expansion,P136-2 63)1)-8 2.928 2,928 (2,928)
Bldg 5 Mor ifn for Reloc of Source Control Inspectors to
Make Way for PI-36 62166-0 35,035 11,473 14,676 12,783 27,458 11,310)
3. Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion,P137 63719.0 31,425,000 60 '000 115,210 1,443 116,663 498,557
4.Security&Landscaping.PI-38-1 52108 F 1,630.000 11000,000 200,666 64,036 264.691 935,984
5.Mi... Mods.Priority Elements Pt-38-2 52108.G 6,370,000 3,600,000 760,059 520.858 1,270,917 2,979,142
6. Mac. Modification.P1-38-4 6210E-H 4,104000 2.OD%000 341,141 22.230 363.371 1,977,770
Transfer to Project Below (684,000) 0
12KV Distribution System for Support Facilities.P1-47 52266.0 584.000 0 0 0
). Fire Protection,Signage and Water Dist.Mods..P138.5 52108-J 2,476.000 150.000 174,346 68.415 242,761 81,585
S.Elect Facility Modllns&Safety Upgratlea,P1.40.1 52187-A 2,902,500 200,000 16,803 10,926 2),)28 189.076
S.Fes,Mocifm Is Safety Upgratlea,PL40-2 52187-9 4,608,000 500,000 33,670 106,083 139J53 393,917
Transfer to Project Below 134,222) (34,222)
Mac Architectural&Treatment Ht Improvements,PO4 52268-0 1.625.600 34.222 34,222 34.222 0
10, Prim Clarifiers 3.4&5 Rehab. Pt-41 52199-A 2,021,600 76,000 20,988 6,686 27,654 68,314
11.Mlsc Improvements,P1 42,P1.46 52219-0 2.205.000 1401000 14,353 78,093 92.446 61,907
12.Saimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems,PI-43 52229-A 4,260,000 I,60g000 50,856 57,289 108,146 1,442,711
13.Seismic Retrofit Structual.P1.44 52125-9 24,OOOA00 70D,000 304.410 359,403 663,813 340,597
14.40 MGD Oxygen Activated Sludge&DAF'e 70,000,000 0 0
15. Belt Pre....14 Units) 16,60%ODD 0 0
16.Sands Storage 14 Sinai I1'"'W0 0 0
17.Digesters: 2 @ 110'Diameter 9,100.000 0 0
18. 12kv Electrical Power Distribution 2,300,000 0 0
19.Emergency Sewage Bypass System 4,000,000 0 0
20.Remove Trickling Filters 1 &3 1'00%000 0 0
21.Central Air Compressor Station 250,000 0 0
22.Miec.Projects (Sea Schedule CI 13,250,000 2,000,000 ),16) 9).3)4 0 104,631 1,902.626
23, Other Master Plan Projects 0 0
a.Headworks No. 1 Rebuild,2003 14,950,000 0 0
b.Headworks No.2 lmpeller/Pump Speed,201If 2,600.000 0 0
c. A...so Trickling Filter.2&4,2007 1,300,000 0 0
d.40 MBE Oxygen Act'd Sludge&OAF,2017 34.00O,OOD 0 0
a. 110'ft Digesters,2003&2012 18,200,000 0 0
I.4 Belt Presses, 2004 10,920,000 0 0
g. 12 KV Power Distribution,200I-2012 111001000 0 0
In.Standby Power Generation, 2005 Is 2015 610001000 0 0
1.72 Mgd Primary Treatment,2004&2012 32.600.000 0 0
SUBTOTAL -RECLAMATION PLANT 1 3)2,624,600 13,215.000 6,380,384 1,831,3)0 0 7,211,758 11,383,628
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B 1
SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 2.14
FISCAL YEAR 1993 94
6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/93
(1) 12) (3) 14) 161 (6)
WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED
ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET
1993-94 1993-94 @ 9/30/93 TO 12/31/93 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 .3
B.Plant 2 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects:
1.S.Ppat Facilities and Site Improvement.
e.Operations Building.P233 5-1 53715-0.A 2,610,000 11500,000 549.799 932.480 1,482.279 567,520
b.Warehouse Building,P2-35-2 61813-H 2.625.000 1.400,000 181,729 39,029 220.758 1,360,971
c.Maintenance Building.P2.363 51813-F 2,725,000 118001000 163,133 21.226 184,359 1,778.774
d.Construction Management Office,P2-35 4 51813.G 80,000 60,000 145,874 36,606 182,480 13,394
e.Phase ll Site&Security imp.,P2-36-5 51813-E 2.100.000 8501000 97,383 10,429 107.812 839,671
2. Rehab Digester 1,J. K,P239.1 52045-0 7.926,000 100,000 415.911 1.707 417.618 98,293
3. Rehab Digester L,M,P2-39-2 3,800,000 100,g00 0 100.000
4. Rehab Digester N,0,P2-39-3 4.800,000 100,000 0 100,000
5.Primary Treatment 24 MOD Expansion,P2-41 53714.0 15,204,500 4.501 96 4.597 (98)
6. Electrification Project,P2.42.1 53718-A 10.1501000 I60,000 9,483.057 579.566 10,002,623 (429,5661
7.Secondary Treatment Expansion,P2-42-2 63718.O,8 17,100,000 B.00 ,wal 2,168.619 4,206,847 6.455,466 3.713,163
S. Priority Misc.Mod.,P2 43 1 52108.0 5.750,000 3.000.000 952,633 1,513,188 2,465,721 1,486,812
S. Misc.Modifications.P2-43-3, P2-55 52108-E,52239 B 7,555,000 2,600,000 73,557 149,448 223,OO5 2.350.652
10.Monimr/Convcl Byemm,P2.4415ee J-23.21 62094-0 3.228,000 275,000 1.898.145 69,095 1,967,240 205,905
11.Mrs Protecdon,Signs&Water Dist.Modifna,P2-46 62176.0 4.864,000 150,000 62,270 97,221 159,491 52.779
12.Eleod Fac Modifna as Safety Upgrade.,P2.474 52189-A 3.452,500 200,000 8,698 5,722 14,420 194,278
13.Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades,P2-47-2 52189.0 4,006,000 600,OOO 19.061 107,513 126.574 392.487
14.Primary Clarifier Rehab. P2-48 52199.0 5.247,000 400.000 63,912 7,167 71,079 392,833
IS.Misc Improvements at Plant 2,P2.49 52220-0 303,000 200.000 15.538 37,484 53,022 162,516
16.Selmlc Retrofit of r1cm-Slmctur.System.,P2.60 52229-6 4,750,000 2,000,000 113,068 17,888 130,966 1,982,112
17.Seismic Retrofit Structural P2-53 62108-C 35,000,000 6,000,OOg 738.803 399,224 1,138,027 4,600,776
Transfer to Project Below (711881 17.188)
Misc Seismic Modifies&Flare Improvements,P2 56 52269-0 239,000 7,188 7,188 7.188 0
18.Salida Storage: 2 Bins 5.200.000 0 0
19.Additional 106 Foot Digester 4.000,000 0 0
20.Plant Water Pump Station 1.200,000 0 0
21.Misc. Projects (Sao Schedule DI 13,180,000 2,000,000 58.505 145,193 0 203,698 1.854.607
22.Other Master Plan Projects 0 0
a.Replace Primary Basins A.8,C,2000 11,70%000 0 0
b.Standby Power Generation,2005&2015 10.0001000 0 0
c. Monitoring and Control System,2006 5201000 0 0
SUB-TOTAL TREATMENT PLANT 2 188,981,000 30,276,000 17,214,096 8,464,317 0 25,678,413 21,810.683
C.Offers Water Rod...tlon Plant.
1. Site Accuisilicn 5,IN 000 5000,COO 0 Blow 000
Transfer to Project Below 18081 16081
Reclmation Rent No. I Water Quality Management Stud 58231.0 280,000 808 608 608 0
2. Reclamation Plant 3 62133-A 401600,000 50,000 606,090 24,667 630,757 25.333
SUBTOTAL- RECLAMATION PLANTS 45,980.000 5,050,000 606.090 26,276 0 531,365 6,024,726
D. Interplant and Joint Facilities 0
1. Interplant FacllOes,69 63713.0 24,000.000 600,000 20.999,092 1,096,844 22,096,]3B 1696,8441
Transfer to Project Below (235,900) (14,077) (14,0771
Industrial Water Pipeline Extension at Plant 2 53713-A 235,900 14.077 24.728 226,232 250,960 1212,155)
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-1
SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4
FISCAL YEAR 1993.94
8 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/93
(t) (2) (31 M) 161 (B)
WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED I ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED
ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET
1993.94 199394 IsM0193 TO 12131/93 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 .3
2.Support Facilities and Site Improvements
a.Admin.Annex at Old Lab Site,J-30&J-11-1 62083-O.A 4,150.000 200,000 98,985 15,262 114,247 184.738
b.0peretion.1Control Center,J-23-1 53712-A 6,0001000 100,000 126,933 20,167 147,100 79,833
c.Computer Equipment,J-23.2 Ban P2.441 53712-8 2,525.000 25,000 2,073,454 87,479 2.160,933 (62,479)
d.Personnel Building at Ph 1.J-26 63716.0 2,950,000 1,400,000 107,401 23,126 130,527 1,376,874
e.Demolition of Old Control Center 460,000 360,000 0 350,000
f.Demolition of Support Eldg.@P2,J-27 62084.0 1,300,000 6001000 89,952 0 69,952 600,000
g.Central Lob lmproyamem.Npgradi s J-17.1.2.3 52257-0 742.000 742.000 13,640 13,640 728,360
3.Control Generation Facility 0 0 0
..Equipment Prepurchase.J-19A 53707-C 22,730,000 360,000 20,466,832 17,4071 (20,200,901) 258,524 367,407
b.Emission Purchase,J-1 BE 53707-A,B 3,100,000 0 3,050,080 0 12,104.580) 945,500 0
c.Plant 1 Facility,J-19-1 53707-A 20.800,000 300,000 20,419,110 684,194 21.103,304 (384,1941
d.Plant 2 Facility,J-19.2 53707-B 29,060,000 8001000 27.624,455 334,774 (27,981.0861 (21.057) 485,220
e. Engine Eyalugation and Restoration 315001000 210001000 0 2,000,000
Transfer to Projects Below (192,1661 (192.165)
J49.2 Engine Damage Rehab @ Plant 2 63707-E 176,747 1.554,355 816,260 2,170,605 (439,5031
J-19.1 Engine Damage Rehab @ Plant 1 63707-F 16,418 354,941 23,680 378.621 18,262)
4.Waste Gas Flea,J-21.J-21A 52040-0 301000 51000 125.706 108,632 234.238 (103,632)
6.Outten Is Booster Pump Stations
a. Repl.outran No. 1 Land Section.J-22-2 63711-A 1,640,000 40,000 1.601,490 36,663 1.637,153 4,337
It. Equipment Prepurchase J-15-A 53703-A 4,500,000 300.000 23,463 (50,7581 127.305) 350,758
c.Temp Cl2 Station for OutfNl No. 1 2,600,000 0 0 0
d. Second Discharge Header GOES'C' 4.425,000 25,000 0 251000
a.Replace 78'wit 20'Outfall to Deep Water 61,260,000 501000 0 501000
6.Computerized Facility Records and Owl.System J 25-1 582160 3,610,000 110001000 83,326 10,864 74,190 989,136
7.Send.Power Systems Rehab.Studies J-25-2 6821E-A 6001000 300,000 1,643 1,643 298,357
B.Telophoneaelemetry Monitoring Exp.J-28 52146-0 630,000 400,000 56,297 311,360 387,657 B8,840
9.Standby Power Reliability Moulins,J-33 52240.0 16,0001000 1,0D0,000 2.188 303,965 308,151 696,035
10.0...R Outlet Reliability Upgrade.,J-34 62241-0 14.000.000 2.000,000 2,147 307.235 309.382 1.692.765
11.Bushard Interplant Trunk Replacement 31,000,000 0 0 0
12. Sludge Disposal Projects 0 0 0
a.Compost Demonstration Plant 9,0001000 0 0 0
b.Lend Acquisition 21,950,000 100,000 0 100,0o0
c.Landfill Development Phase 28.600.000 0 0 0
d.Compost Facility 50,360,000 0 0 0
13.District Information Management Network 0 0 0
a. Malm.&Doer Mgmnt Computer System 52149 A 900.000 250,000 609,577 132,482 (5,299) 636,760 117,618
b.Lab Information Management System Upgrades 52149 B 250,000 250,000 16,334 9,919 28,263 240,081
c.PmcheainglAccountinglFinanclel Information System 52149-C 1.501.000 750.000 1,412 50,671 52,083 699,329
d.Network System Integration $20,000 340,000 10 340,000
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-1
SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4
FISCAL YEAR 1993-94
6 MONTHS ENDED 12MI/93
(1) (2) 131 (4) Ml (6)
WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED
ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET
1993.94 1993-94 (Q16/30193 TO 12/31/93 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 .3
14.Improved In-Rent Sampling Facilities 115.000 1001000 0 lo0,0o0
15.Effluent Sampler Systems J-32-1,2 52212.0 325.000 185.000 47,492 264.383 311,875 (79,383)
1 S.Other Master Ran Project. 0 0 0
a.Expend DOES'C'to North 2019 27,126,000 0 0 0
It.Sludge Disc.Landfill Phase ll 2011 15.800.000 0 0 0
c.Sludge Disp. Equip Phase I&II 2001 11,500,000 0 0 0
17.Water Quality Diversion and Treatment Study(SARI) 68221-0 120,000 20,000 0 0 0 0 20.000
1 B.Mien Projects (See Schedule E) 11,710,000 1.500,000 200.798 269,103 (11,702) 448,199 1,240,897
SUB-TOTAL -INTERPLANT&JOINT 429,258,000 16,892,000 99,640,538 4,879,103 (50,303.568) 54.216.071 11,012,897
SUBTOTAL - MAJOR PROJECTS 1.036.843.500 64,432,000 I 122.741.108 1 15,200.069 (50,303,56811 8).637,607 49,231,931
E.Special Proiects.Studies.Research&Development
1.Action Plan:
a. NPDES Permit(Application) 58209-F 375,000 5010D0 340,307 13,986 364,293 36,014
b. NPDES Permit(Monitoring Changes) 100,000 so," 0 501000
2.Solids Treatment,Disposal and Reuse 1,150,000 150,000 0 150,000
Transfer to Reject Below 11.7101 (1,710)
Sludge Disposal Related Projects 58214.0 7,710 254,441 1,710 256,161 0
3.Air Duality Control Program 0 0
a.Air Toxics Inventory(AB2588 w/PEEP) 11548.0DO 30010D0 0 300,000
It.Taxies and ROG Control:I iofilter R&D 58227-0 380,000 330,000 31,225 75,500 106,725 254,500
c.Air Emissions Source Control 50.000 50.0D0 0 50,Oo0
d.SCAOMO Rule 431.1:Sulfur Control 2001000 200,000 0 200,000
e.SCAOMD Rule 1179:Odor Control 6701" 420,000 0 420,000
I.SCAQMD Marketable Permits Program 50,000 50,000 0 501000
g.Taxics Risk Reduction Program 260,0D0 250.0DO 0 250,000
h.A.G.Database Development 76,000 60,Oo0 0 501000
4.Water Consary&Reclamation R&D Projects 850.000 100,000 0 100,000
Transfer to Project Below (38,1701 (19,845) 0 (19,845)
Flow Monitoring for Water Condom Project Ph 1 Pan 3 582230 38.170 13.781 24,389 0 24,389 13,781
Ultraviolet Ught Pilot Rent 52133-C 6,064 2,"S 7,448 (1,384)
5.Eviornmentel Research&Development 2,785.0DO 500.000 0 5001000
Transfer to Projects Below (1,000,]391 (105,864) 0 (105,864)
Devel&Appl of Molecular Tech to Detect Indicator&Pathogenic 0 0
Microorganisms in Treated WA9 NWRI Project WO-9 58228-0 453,918 47,824 160,463 99,924 280,287 (52,0001
Collaborative Naml Study Using Molecular Tech to Detect Hepetitus A Virus 0 0
&Virulence Factor Genes in E.Coli.NWRI Rol HR-92.0 58229-0 496,821 8,040 (18,175) (3%175) (57,3501 47,216
Spatial&Temporal Wastewater Discharge Rums Study 58230-0 50,000 501000 34,165 34,165 15,835
6. Master Plan Update 3.600.000 1001000 0 100,000
Transfer to Project Below (113061 11,3U81
Air Quality Management Implementation Plan 58232-0 3]5.000 1,306 1,308 1,306 0
SUB-TOTAL-SPECIAL PROJECTS 12.083.000 2.600.000 ]92.650 194.764 0 987,414 2,405,236
F. Equipment Items 48,469.000 3,DG0,0DO 248,25] 1,561,]fi6 11,214,623) 695.400 1,438.234
SUB-TOTAL-JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 1,09],396,600 70,032.000 123.]82,013 18,968,599 151,518,191) 89,220,421 53,076,401
CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS COMPLETED AT 6/30/93 SCHEDULE F 6.389,222 (62.584) (143,118) 6,163.520 62,584
f] TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 1,09],395,500 70.032,000 130,151,235 16.894.015 (51,661,3091 95.383.941 53.137,985
1/26194
QUARTERLY
WORKERS' COMP SELF-INSURED FUND BUDGET REVIEW
6 MONTHS ENDED 12-31-93
A a c D E F G
ACTUAL % OF BUDGET REMAINING ACTUAL TO DATE
1993-94 THROUGH THROUGH 1993-94 THROUGH INCREASE FROM
BUDGET 12-31-93 12-31-93 BUDGET 12-31-92 (DECREASE) 7-1-79
EXPENDITURES
1 Salaries 10,000 0 0.00% 10,000 0 0 160,084
2 Claims 165,000 67,723 41.04% 97,277 83,349 (15,626) 1,528,152
3 Contractual Services 35,000 14,828 42.37% 20,172 15,105 (277) 180,428
4 Legal Services 5,000 0 0.00% 5,000 0 0 0
5 Professional Services 35,000 13.259 37.88% 21,741 15,713 (2,454) 252,047
6 Supplies &Other 12,000 669 5.58% 11,331 516 153 21,204
7 Sub Total 262,000 96.479 36.82% 165,521 114,683 (18,204) 2,185,060
8 Excess Loss Policy 60.000 18.368 30.61% 41,632 0 18,368 403,840
9 Total Expenditures 322.000 114,847 35.67% 207,153 114,683 164 2.588.900
REVENUES &RESERVES
10 In-Lieu Premiums 225,000 112.500 50.00% 112,500 112,500 0 2,119,588
11 Interest&Other 80,000 26.248 32.81% 53,752 30,245 (3.997) 919,987
12 Total Revenues 305.000 138.748 45.49% 166,252 142,745 (3,997) 3,039,575
13 Excess Revenue (Expense) (17,000) 23,901 (40,901) 28,062 (4,161) 450,675
14 Beginning Reserves 661,000 708,541 633,092
15 Transfers 0 0 250,000
16 Ending Reserves 644,000 732.442 661,154 700,675
WCQB1293.XLS
1128194
QUARTERLY
PUBLIC LIABILITY SELF-INSURED FUND BUDGET REVIEW
6 MONTHS ENDED 12-31-93
A B C D E F G
ACTUAL % OF BUDGET REMAINING ACTUAL TO DATE
1993-94 THROUGH THROUGH 1993-94 THROUGH INCREASE FROM
BUDGET 12-31-93 12-31-93 BUDGET 12-31-92 (DECREASE) 7.1-79
EXPENDITURES
1 Salaries 1,000 0 0.00% 1,000 0 0 1,715
2 Claims 120.000 613 0.51% 119,387 450,672 (450,059) 845,516
3 Contractual Services 10.000 14,212 142.12% (4,212) 1,110 13.102 90,602
4 Legal Services 80,000 49,480 81.85% 30,520 107,521 (118.041) 1.140.442
5 Professional Services 10,000 237 2.37% 9,763 3,424 (3,187) 128,468
6 Supplies & Other 1,000 0 0.00% 1,000 0 0 0
7 Sub Total 222,000 64,542 29.07% 157,458 622,727 1558,185) 2.207,743
8 Excess Loss Policy' 0 0 0 0 0 406,217
9 Total Expenditures 222,000 64,542 29.07% 157,458 622,727 (558.185) 2,612,960
REVENUES & RESERVES
10 In-Lieu Premiums 0 0 0.00% 0 175,000 (175,0001 2,541.509
11 Interest& Other 225,000 151,351 67.27% 73,849 947,598 (796,2471 2,894.136
12 Allocation to Other Funds 1.000 0 0.00% 1.000 0 0 123.929
13 Reimbursement from Stop Loss 0 0 0.00% 0 0 152,449
14 Total Revenues 226.000 151,351 88.97% 74,549 1.122,598 1971,247) 6,712,023
15 Excess Revenue (Expense) 4.000 88,809 (82,809) 499,871 (413.062) 3,099,083
16 Beginning Reserves 3.211.000 3,252,254 2,184,884
17 Transfers 0 0 250,000
18 Ending Reserves 3,215.000 3,349,063 2,684,755 3,349.083
Districts have been entirely self-insured for liability exposures since 1988.
This policy is reviewed by the Directors annually.
PLOB1293.XLS
1126194
QUARTERLY
SELF-FUNDED HEALTH PLAN BUDGET REVIEW
6 MONTHS ENDED 12-31.93
A B C D E F G
ACTUAL %OF BUDGET REMAINING ACTUAL TO DATE
1993.94 THROUGH THROUGH 1993.94 THROUGH INCREASE mom
BUDGET 12-31.93 12-31-93 BUDGET 12-31-92 IDECREASEI 711RS
EXPENDITURES
1 Claims-Medical 2,989,000 1,004.362 33.60 1,984,638 1,084.726 (80.364) 11,717.666
2 -Dental 400,000 139,365 34.84 260,635 179,666 (40.3011 1,870.183
3 -Disability' 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 173.457
4 Sub-Total 3,389,000 1,143.727 33.75 2.245.273 1.264.392 (120.665) 13.761.306
5 Cont,..W.l Service. 90.000 58,065 64.52 31,935 45.544 12.521 505.932
6 Stop Loss lnauranee 115,000 55,025 47.85 59.976 66.588 (11.563) 912.723
7 Total Expenditure. 3.594.000 1.256,817 34.97 2.337.183 1.378.524 (119.7071 15.179.961
REVENUE 6 RESERVES
8 In-Lieu Prem. -CSDOC 1,489,000 1,047,748 70.37 441,252 515.114 532.634 7,857,940
9 - Employee. 494,000 223,565 45.26 270,435 187.641 35.924 1.698.469
10 Sub-Tate) 1.983,000 1,271,313 64.11 711,687 702.755 568.558 9,556.409
11 Reimburse from Stop Lt..Ins 0 76.482 (76,482) 0 76.482 772.760
12 SupplementN CSDOC Funding 1.611,000 120,747 7.50 1.490.253 915.492 (694.745) 4,814.652
13 Other 0 1.212 (1,212) 717 495 150,748
14 Total Revenues 3,594.000 1,469.754 40.89 2,124,246 1,518,964 (49.210) 15,294,S59
15 Excee.Revenue(E.pen.e) 0 212.937 (212.937) 142.640 70.497 114.608
16 Cash end Carry-over Be.... 184,000 15.305 (1,123)
17 Transfers 51,681
18 Ending R..... 184.000 228,242 aaaaaaaaa�141.317 114.608
'Disability insurance has been purchased rather
then self-funded since December 1989
SFMQ1293.XLS
February 10, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
91 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
IM4A EWB AVENUE
STAFF REPORT RO DON9127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.LALIFORNIA 92728.8127
PROPOSED PRIDE AWARDS nlm e62-2411
During the past few months several Personal Responsibility in Daily Effort (PRIDE)
proposals have been evaluated. Following is a summary of those safety or
cost-saving proposals that staff recommends for certificates and cash awards, in
accordance with the Board-approved PRIDE program. Two of these four PRIDE
proposals are estimated to save the Districts approximately $20,184.00 annually,
while the other two are safety improvements. The five recommended awards total
$2,218.40.
PRIDE No. 253 - Automatic Level Control.
This proposal will automate the sluice gates on the trickling filters at Plant No. 1
thereby saving operator labor hours that are currently being utilized on a regular
basis to manually control the incoming flow. The proposed award to Ron Wade for
this suggestion is 10% of the first year savings, or $1,350.00.
PRIDE No. 261 - Chlorine Solution Water Emergency Supply System.
This suggestion proposes the installation of a six-inch bypass pipe with a backflow
prevention device from the industrial water supply line into the plant water supply
line in tunnel No. 1. This will provide water for continued chlorination of
wastewater in the event of a plant water shutdown. Staff proposes a $100.00
cash award to Jeffrey Reed for this odor control suggestion.
PRIDE No. 297 - Move Liahtinc for Safer Access.
This proposal recommends relocating the florescent lights in the access tunnel to
the C-Headworks grit lifts to a higher level. Raising these lights to over seven feet
will eliminate the possibility of employees sustaining head injuries. This suggestion
improves safety and the proposed award is $100.00 to be shared by Daniel Houck
and Lynn Redman.
PRIDE NO. 304 - Ventilation Enhancement.
This proposal recommends joining the east and west ventilation ducting at the
pump gallery at the new Plant 1 primary facilities, P1-33. This will eliminate the
need for the exhaust fans by utilizing the natural convection to remove air from the
area using the three stairwells and the ramp entrance. This proposal will save
electrical costs with a first year's net savings of $6,684.00. A cash award of
10%, or $668.40 is proposed for Ron Wade.
GGS:lc
REF:J:IVMOLtf4 WGIMDES2-94
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ASSOC. OF GOV'TS
REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
• DRAFT ISSUED IN DECEMBER
• 15 CHAPTERS/13 ELEMENTS. . .
INCLUDING WATER QUALITY
• SOME MANDATORY/SOME NOT
• MARCH 4 CLOSE OF COMMENTS
• APRIL 4 ADOPTION BY R.C.
BUT ...
REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
VS.
EARTHQUAKE AND DEBATE
• DELAY GROWTH MANAGEMENT
30-60 DAYS
• DELAY REGIONAL MOBILITY
30-60 DAYS
• DELAY AIR QUALITY
6 MONTHS
• DELAY OTHER ELEMENTS
12 MONTHS
• NEXT ACTION BY R.C. MARCH 3-4
• RCP WORKSHOP MARCH 3
DRAFT
REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CONTAINS 13 MAJOR ELEMENTS
1 . THE ECONOMY
2. GROWTH MANAGEMENT
3. REGIONAL MOBILITY
4. AIR QUALITY
5. HOUSING
6. HUMAN RESOURCES/SERVICES
7. FINANCE
8. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION
9. WATER RESOURCES
10. WATER QUALITY (INCLUDES WW)
11 . ENERGY
12. HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
13. INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT
ORANGE COUNTY'S
REGIONAL ADVISORY AND
PLANNING COUNCIL
• JANUARY 20 ANALYSIS MAILED TO:
SCAG R.C. MEMBERS
O.C. CITIES
OCTA
TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR
AGENCIES
CSDOC
• AWAITING RETURN COMMENTS
• RAPC/ESC COMMENTS TO SCAG
CLEAN AIR ACT ISSUES
• CENTERPOINT IS CONFORMITY
• NO FEDERAL "ACTION " WITHOUT IT
• THE "HOOK" : OUR PERMIT
• SCAG 'S FINDING IS NOT ENOUGH
• EACH FEDERAL AGENCY HAS TO
MAKE ITS OWN FINDING
• FEDERAL AGENCIES CAN
"BORROW" FINDINGS
CLEAN WATER ACT ISSUES
• REGIONAL PLANNING
(SECTION 208)
• SCAG DID 208 PLAN
IN 1978
• WASTEWATER AGENCIES
ON THEIR OWN
• NEW COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING
MANDATES
• SCAG ASKS TO BE:
COORDINATOR/LIAISON
ENSURE CONSISTENCY WITH
OTHER OBJECTIVES
REVIEW WW FACILITY
PLANS FOR POPULATION
CONSISTENCY
REGARDING CLEAN WATER ISSUES
SANITATION DISTRICTS STAFF
SUGGEST:
- WASTEWATER TREATMENT
AGENCIES LEAD
- SCAG AS COORDINATOR,
REPORTER , DATAKEEPER
- POPULATION PROJECTIONS THRU
CONSENSUS
CLEAN AIR MANDATES
MUST NOT INTERFERE WITH
CLEAN WATER MANDATES
CONTENTS OF THE
WATER QUALITY CHAPTER
(INCLUDING WASTEWATER)
• CURRENT WATER QUALITY LAWS
• DESCRIPTION OF WATER
RESOURCES
• WATER QUALITY IN SCAG REGION
• CURRENT W.Q. MGMT FRAMEWORK
• FUTURE REGIONAL ISSUES
(INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS,
POLICY OPTIONS, ACTIONS)
SANITATION DISTRICTS STAFF
RECOMMENDED FUTURE ACTION
• CONVEY RECOMMENDED
LANGUAGE CHANGES BY MARCH 4
• MONITOR NEW DRAFTS (S)
• ADVOCATE THE PRINCIPLES OF:
- COMPREHENSIVE WATERSHED
MANAGEMENT
- WW AGENCY LEADERSHIP
- BALANCED ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
- MAINTAINING CLEAN WATER
OBJECTIVES
WHAT DOES "CONFORMITY" WITH
THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
REQUIRE OF WASTEWATER
TREATMENT AGENCIES?
1 . WWTP FACILITIES MUST BE SIZED
& SERVICE-PHASED ACCORDING
TO POPULATION PROJECTIONS
ADOPTED OR APPROVED BY SCAG .
2. WWTP AGENCIES MUST HAVE A
REPORTING SYSTEM FOR SHARING
INFORMATION .
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.I ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
Ip ELL19 AVENUE
January 19, 1994
VO 90M 91b
February
EOVNIMN VALLEY.GL60GMA 927284121
Revised February 16, 1994 MI.,9s2.2.11
STAFF REPORT
EVALUATION OF SCAG'S REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FOR WATER QUALITY ELEMENT (WHICH INCLUDES WASTEWATER TREATMENT)
BACKGROUND
In December, the Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG) staff issued the initial draft of the Regional
Comprehensive Plan (RCP) for the six-county area of Southern
California, (excluding only San Diego County) . The draft
contains 15 chapters and deals with 13 major elements:
The Economy
Growth Management
Regional Mobility
Air Quality
Housing
Human Resources and Services
Finance
Open Space and Conservation
Water Resources
Water Quality
Energy
Hazardous Waste Management
Integrated Solid Waste Management
It is a very ambitious undertaking. SCAG, in the introductory
section of the RCP, states:
"This document. . .sets a broad set of goals for the region,
and identifies strategies for agencies at all levels to use
in guiding their decision-making toward implementation of
the proposal (contained within it) . . .
"It is not a proscription for local government. Rather, it
is a comprehensive overview of the region, focusing on its
growth and problems, and it suggests a strategy that local
governments may elect to use. . . in meeting these
challenges. . .
'-There are two types of components in the plan: those that
respond directly to federal or state mandates, and those
that are included in the interest of comprehensiveness.
These latter are indispensable to the understanding of the
former. . .
--It must be clearly noted that the inclusion of any
component or issue in this plan in no way changes the
1
(existing) mandates, or adds to them. These additions are
intended to serve only as guidance and a
framework. . . (for) . . . inform(ed) decisions on the mandates, on
local plans, and on governance in general as it seeks to
improve the quality of life for all (the) region's
residents. . . "
Because some of these elements are mandated by state and/or
federal law while others are non-mandated and have been
electively added to the plan, SCAG has had considerable
consultation with various agencies and governmental bodies. SCAG
staff has been in the process of drafting the RCP for over a
year. The Plan has begun to receive considerable interest and
comment.
Over the next year the SCAG Regional Council will hold a number
of meetings and workshops with the public and with decision-
makers prior to adopting a completed document. Public commentary
was scheduled to close March 4th and adoption by the SCAG
Regional Council on April 7, 1994 . However, we have been
informed by senior SCAG staff that it is now a near certainty
that SCAG's Regional Council will decide to significantly delay
this schedule. The January 17th earthquake caused several SCAG
workshops to be cancelled. And there must be far more
consultation between SCAG and the counties within the region
because of the disagreements that have surfaced regarding the
content of the RCP. For example, there is mounting uncertainty
and concern voiced by some of the counties (including orange
County) about whether all of the elements contained within the
draft RCP should be included in the final RCP. For this reason,
the final content and format of the RCP may be significantly
different than the December 1993 draft.
The actual review and adoption schedule is unknown at this time.
SCAG staff is estimating that the Growth Management and Regional
Mobility Elements may be delayed 30 to 60 days, the Air Quality
Element by 6 months and the other elements by 12 months. We have
heard conflicting interpretations about whether the Water Quality
Element is mandatory or elective--which will affect when and if
it is the subject of review for inclusion within the RCP.
The Water Quality Element (copy attached) , which contains
portions that are mandated, has direct interest to the Districts
and is the subject of this staff report.
STAFF SUMMARY ANALYSIS
The Water Quality Element was drafted after consultation with
representatives of public agencies and private firms. These
representatives included staff from the Districts, several of our
sister agencies, representatives of industry and the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. The
2
Water Quality Element describes a bottoms-up approach to managing
the region's water resources. It emphasizes local government
participation, flexibility and scientifically-based decision
making for addressing the ever-changing water quality issues here
in Southern California.
The Districts' staff finds that, with one exception pertaining to
conformity vis-a-vis to pacing wastewater facilities construction
with population projections, which is discussed below, the Water
Quality Element fully supports the Districts' objectives for
providing balanced environmental protection and will not conflict
with our 30-year Facilities Master Plan entitled 112020 VISION."
In addition, the Water Quality Element's underlying philosophy of
site-specific water quality decision-making complements the
comprehensive watershed management initiative that Districts'
staff has promoted along with other members of the Association of
Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (a nationally-based organization)
and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (a state-
wide organization) . Site-specific decision making has the
potential advantage of giving local stakeholders (public and
private) more involvement in setting priorities and expending
resources.
The Water Quality Element also supports a related chapter
contained within the Administration's so called green book on
water quality issues entitled, "President Clinton's Clean Water
Initiatives", dated January 31, 1994. The Administration
proposes the use of comprehensive watershed management which
would focus attention within hydrologically-defined areas and
engage stakeholders from all levels of government as well as the
private sector. Under this concept, site-specific analysis of
problems and locally-based implementation efforts would address
any remaining water quality concerns, aquatic-living resources
and human health issues of a watershed.
Staff agrees with the interpretation of SCAG staff that regional
wastewater planning is mandated by Section 208 of the federal
Clean Water Act. Staff concurs with SCAG's conclusion that SCAG
is presently in the best position to coordinate these activities
as long as it is clearly stated in the RCP that the wastewater
treatment agencies in this region must each have the lead
decision-making responsibility within their respective service
areas.
Staff agrees with SCAG's interpretation that Section 176 of the
federal Clean Air Act and EPA's Final Rule for determining
conformity require that for projects, funding and permits to
receive approval by federal agencies, they must conform to the
air quality management plan for our region. This is relevant to
the Districts because our ocean discharge permit is jointly
issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and
3
the EPA (a federal agency) . But, for many of our sister
wastewater treatment plants and other essential public services
that have absolutely no expectation of ever having to receive
federal approval, funding or permits, the conformity requirement
of Section 176 of the federal Clean Air Act has no relevancy.
While Staff believes that the conformity test has direct bearing
on the Districts, it also recommends that the test of conformity
appearing within the RCP must be modified to guarantee that the
Districts (and other wastewater treatment agencies that undergo
the conformity test) can proactively construct needed facilities
to meet growth and regulatory demands while meeting a reasonable
test of conformity with air quality management goals.
Staff believes that SCAG maybe capable of making conformity
analyses of the Districts ' long-term, master-planning efforts.
However, SCAG's determination may or may not have any direct
bearing on the Districts' success in receiving a federal
determination of conformity. Why is this? Because any federal
agency, including EPA, must make its own determination, according
to EPA's Final Rule for Determining Conformity, published
November 30, 1993 . The rule requires that any federal agency
taking action on a project, permit or grant must make its own
finding of conformity regarding its contemplated action. But,
the Final Rule also requires the federal agency to consider
comments from any interested parties and may choose to adopt the
analysis of another federal agency.
SCAG making conformity findings is somewhat of a "crap shoot. "
On one hand, SCAG's efforts to make a finding of conformity may
muddy the waters because it may be contradictory or redundant to
EPA's efforts to make its own finding. On the other hand, a
favorable finding by SCAG regarding the Districts' conformity
with the air quality management plan may be helpful in
predisposing EPA to also make a positive finding. Quite frankly,
over the long haul, Districts' staff have found SCAG more
accessible and open to discussion and compromise than we have
found EPA staff to be.
The following paragraphs support the staff analysis. Suggested
language changes for inclusion within the RCP follow the review
section of this Staff Report.
REVIEW OF THE RCP WATER QUALITY ELEMENT
The Water Quality Element, appearing as Chapter 11 of the
Regional Comprehensive Plan, for the SCAG region:
• outlines current water quality goals,
• describes our existing water resources and quality,
• describes who is now responsible for managing water
4
quality,
• outlines existing and emerging issues affecting water
quality management,
• recommends policy options; and,
• relates water quality issues to other regional issues.
Within the chapter, it is stated that;
"The water quality chapter is not intended to be a
prescriptive plan for addressing water quality issues in the
region. many public agencies in the region have
responsibility for planning and maintaining the quality of
the region's water. Instead, the chapter is intended to
provide a regional perspective on current water quality
issues and the plans and programs for addressing these
issues, and to better clarify the relationship between water
quality and other regional concerns. '-
The chapter points out that water quality decision-making is
complicated by the numerous federal, state and local governmental
entities and private stakeholders that have vested
responsibilities and interests in how water quality is managed.
Incidentally, by last count of the Districts' staff, in the Santa
Ana River watershed alone, there are 36 wastewater facilities,
2, 000 miscellaneous permittees, 3 counties, over 50 cities, 4
state agencies, 7 federal agencies and countless stakeholders
such as agriculture, land development, environmental
organizations, mining, flood control and water supply.
Currently, there is no effective coordination of the efforts of
these parties. However, the Water Quality Element describes a
decision-making approach that Districts' staff have promoted on
the regional, state and federal policy scene for over 15 years:
use a collaborative bottoms-up process that provides site-
specific solutions to actual conditions. This is at the heart of
the Districts' successful operation under Section 301(h) of the
federal Clean Water Act that allows us to safely discharge high
quality, but less-than-full-secondary-treated wastewater to the
deep, well-mixed and highly assimilative waters of coastal orange
County. For these reasons, the Districts' staff endorses the
general concept of streamlining regulations and placing local
government in a co-equal role with federal and state government
in watershed management decision-making.
The Water Quality chapter relates how the SCAG region is expected
to undergo continued population growth. In the entire SCAG
region, this amounts to a population increase from the existing
14 million to 23 million (64%) by the year 2020. For the
Districts' service area we projected a population increase from
1.98 million to 2.79 million (55%) from 1990 to 2020 in our 30-
5
year Facilities Master Plan. In 1988, SCAG' s population
projections coincided with our projections and were quite helpful
in supporting the basis for our facilities needs conclusions and
programmatic EIR.
The Water Quality chapter points out that increasingly stringent
water quality requirements will continue to be a long-term
reality. New requirements will not only continue to address
wastewater treatment plants (on which the Clean Water Act has
focused for the last 20 years) , but on urban and agricultural
polluted runoff as well. These new requirements will exert
financial and coordination demands on a wider number of
governmental and private entities. For this reason, it is
imperative that regionally-based conditions be incorporated into
all future water quality decisions. The Water Quality chapter
supports this point-of-view.
Pacing Wastewater Facilities Construction with Population
Proiections. With this background, the Water Quality Element
chapter discusses watershed planning and management as the
logical framework for appropriate decision-making. Watershed
planning implies the use of a holistic approach to setting
priorities and prudently expending limited public and private
resources. Stakeholders within a watershed jointly determine the
problems within a watershed and establish a game plan. Because
all levels of government work together in a cooperative fashion,
the existing level of overlap, duplication and bureaucratic
gridlock can be minimized.
There is one issue that the chapter discusses that is of special
interest to the Districts. The chapter recommends that
wastewater treatment agency facility planning and facility
development be consistent with population projections contained
in the Regional Comprehensive Plan. This is consistent with
EPA's Final Rule for Determining Conformity, published November
30, 1993, which states in 51.858 (a) (5) (v) that:
"An action. . .required to have a conformity
determination. . .for ozone or nitrogen dioxide. . .will be
determined to conform to the applicable SIP if. . .the action
involves regional water and/or wastewater projects, (and)
such projects are sized to meet only the needs of population
projections that are in the applicable SIP. "
On one hand, this ensures that future wastewater capacity is
adequate to serve the increasing population expected within our
region. There is little disagreement with this objective; and,
in fact, it is the basis on which our 1989 Facilities Master Plan
was based. Districts' staff found that our population
projections matched those of SLAG.
6
On the other hand, SCAG asserts:
that consistency between wastewater capacity and population
projections helps to ensure that "increases in capacity do
not unnecessarily out pace projections of future population
and development. Capacity expansions may serve as an
inducement to development and growth in a manner that is
contrary to the region's air quality goal. "
Because EPA's Final Rule, Section 51.859 obligates all federal
agencies to make analyses of conformity based on: " . . .planning
assumptions must be derived from the estimates of population,
employment, travel, and congestion most recently approved by the
MPO. . . " (our MPO is SCAG) , it is vital that SCAG is sensitive to
our point of view and explicitly states its objective to support
our proactive wastewater treatment facilities planning and
construction efforts. It is for this reason that we must
maintain close consultation with SCAG as the RCP evolves.
It is difficult to imagine any legitimate reasons for opposing
proactive wastewater facility construction. First, the mere
presence of wastewater treatment capacity by itself is an
insufficient inducement for development to significantly shift
from what would otherwise occur. Development requires the entire
range of infrastructure to proceed, water supply, of course,
being one of the most significant.
Second, no public wastewater agency is in the budgetary position
to build a great deal of excess capacity. The wastewater
treatment agencies in this region simply do not have the fiscal
resources to construct unneeded facilities or facilities that
anticipate service needs well into the future.
Putting an impediment to so called "unneeded" facilities
expansion is unnecessary and dangerous to the Districts' stated
objective of proactively constructing needed wastewater treatment
facilities and necessary reserve capacity to assure our ability
to protect public health and the environment without
interruption.
SCAG's statement that "capacity expansions may serve as an
inducement to development and growth" generates a concern that
"excess" capacity is undesirable. This may prevent or restrain
public wastewater treatment agencies like the Districts from
doing the right thing. We, like many of our sister agencies,
attempt to construct new facilities economically and with forward
vision. When the market is right or when the economy of scale is
helpful, we sometimes build facilities at a somewhat accelerated
schedule.
For the sake of long-term reliability (we must continuously
operate 24-hours per day, 365 days-per-year or we haven't
7
successfully done our jobs) we use conservative design criteria
and build facilities to withstand unforeseen storm events and
unanticipated flow demand.
Because it is nearly always more economical and straightforward
to build one large plant addition than it is to build two or more
small additions, we tend to see our treatment capacity "saw-
tooth" upward while population increases as a smooth upward
slope. For this reason, depending upon the timing, we may appear
to have an unneeded amount of capacity when all we are doing is
anticipating what we know will be needed. As another example, it
makes no sense to tear up the community by building a sewer with
limited future capacity and then have to come back a few years
later and parallel it. Also, when we anticipate a new regulatory
mandate, we sometimes proactively design, construct and start-up
the necessary facilities so that we remain consistently in
compliance. Finally, we must have adequate reserve capacity to
allow for system maintenance and repairs.
In the last few years we have sometimes witnessed regulatory
agencies viewing us as "the bad guys" for wanting to construct
essential public services. What an irony! Twenty-two years ago,
as the federal Clean Water Act was enacted, the Nation embarked
on an ambitious program to spend over $100 billion of federal,
state and local government funds to upgrade moderate wastewater
treatment infrastructure. We were digging out of a collective
hole from which we have only recently emerged as a nation of
individual communities. With this experience still fresh in our
minds, no thinking wastewater treatment professional or local
government official wants to compromise public health and the
environment. But the future can only be assured by remaining
proactive and responsible in our long-range facilities planning
and construction efforts. This is a practice that the Districts'
Boards and staff have supported in word and deed for over 20
years. It's a standard that our public insists on. It is why we
are a national leader in wastewater management.
When the responsibility of a wastewater treatment agency for
achieving the region-s air quality objectives is discussed, there
is a reality that is often overlooked. The reality is that many
wastewater treatment agencies have absolutely no authority
regarding land-use decisions within the communities they serve.
Fortunately, it appears that EPA is now listening. in EPA's
Final Rule for Determining Conformity response to comments, it is
stated on page 63220 that:
"It is unlikely, however, that Congress intended federal
agencies to be responsible for emissions that are not
practicably under their control. . .EPA does not believe that
it is reasonable to conclude that a federal agency
'supports' an activity by third persons over whom the agency
has no practical control. . .based on the mere fact that, if
8
one inspects the 'causal ' chain of events, the activity or
emissions can be described as being a 'reasonably
foreseeable' result of the agency's action. "
Districts' staff believe that this can be interpreted to apply
also to the wastewater agency for which the conformity criteria
are being applied.
Many wastewater agencies have no land-use planning authority.
This is true for agencies such as the County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles
County, the Chino Basin Municipal Water District (providing
wastewater services to western San Bernardino County) , Eastern
Municipal Water District (providing wastewater services to
central Riverside County) , and the Ventura Regional Sanitation
District. There are other examples as well. Every county within
the SCAG region has at least one major wastewater treatment
agency whose governing board has absolutely no responsibility for
local land-use decisions. Therefore, to hold wastewater
treatment facility construction as a "hostage" for the sake of
achieving air quality goals is not only obviously contrary to
water quality goals; but is, in fact, an ineffective strategy and
contradictory to EPA's own conclusion as outlined above. It
could seriously impair water quality improvement efforts.
For this reason, SCAG, or any other governmental body, can not
ask wastewater treatment agencies to do what they can not do.
Comprehensive Watershed Management. Regarding the issue of
comprehensive watershed management, Districts' staff is able to
report that the administrative branch of the federal government
now supports our long-held belief that holistic, site-specific,
decision-making is the most effective way to address water
quality problems. In "President Clinton's Clean water
Initiative, January 31, 199411, it is stated that:
"An updated Clean Water Act can tackle these problems
through a new, more targeted approach. Through "designer
partnerships" among Federal, State and local governments,
private landowners, industry and the public, we can craft
flexible, innovative, efficient solutions to water quality
problems, increasingly making watersheds the basis of
analysis and action. . . "
Districts' staff support this new paradigm and believe that it is
complemented by the Water Quality Element.
The Ouestion of Federal Mandate. Regarding the issue of
federally-mandated regional water quality planning, SCAG staff
asserts that the Water Quality Element is mandated by Section 208
of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Section 176 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) . SCAG staff argues that Section 208 of the CWA requires
9
that area-wide waste treatment management planning be conducted
by new or existing regional agencies and that the plan be updated
regularly to insure that it remains relevant and targeted. They
also argue that Section 176 of the CAA requires that all federal
agencies that permit, fund or authorize projects or activities
must have an affirmative finding of conformity with the approved
air quality management plan for the region.
CWA Section 208 Planning. While it is true that Section 208 of
the CWA mandates area-wide waste treatment management, in point
of fact, this region's wastewater treatment planning and
construction efforts have occurred at the sole initiative of each
of the dozens of wastewater treatment agencies in our region with
little or no coordination on a regional scale. The region's last
wastewater treatment plan (often referred to as a 208 Plan) was
completed in 1979.
This has not been a significant barrier to effective wastewater
problem solving--yet. We all do our own facilities master
planning and have been relatively successful in meeting rising
wastewater treatment and sewer capacity demands. In the case of
the Districts, for instance, our system is largely independent of
our neighboring sister agencies. By consulting with the Orange
County cities we serve, we can effectively plan our facilities.
Where we have an ongoing and direct infrastructure tie-in with a
neighboring agency (in the cases, for instance, of Irvine Ranch
Water District and the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority) ,
the staffs and boards of the agencies have crafted cooperative
agreements to address the common needs of the agencies.
In the future, a more coordinated regional approach will be
desirable. While each of the existing wastewater agencies must
have lead responsibility for making facilities planning and
construction decisions, it is quite likely that better
coordination will be necessary. New water quality regulatory
initiatives by the state and the federal government will demand
it. Regional approaches to groundwater renewal projects and the
use of reclaimed water will improve our ability to coordinate
this work. Changes to the Clean Water Act will undoubtedly
contain funding and flexibility features that will serve as
incentives for conducting comprehensive watershed management.
For these reasons comprehensive watershed management or regional
water quality management envisioned in Section 208 of the 1972
CWA (and its subsequent reauthorizations) have the potential to
finally bring site-specific decision-making to water quality
problem-solving. In the long run, this will also prove to be the
most cost-effective approach to solving water quality problems.
Unfortunately, because of the way Section 208 was administered in
the past, successful regional water quality planning failed to
occur in most areas of the country, including ours. The 208
Planning process failed here because federal clean water grants
10
and rapidly evolving federal command-and-control mandates quickly
overran local government's ability to work regionally. We were
all forced to plan on our own. In addition, there was a feeding
frenzy over the federal funds offered to construct facilities.
Competition and limited time windows erased any hope of
cooperation between agencies competing for the same funds.
Because federal and state permitting and enforcement initiatives
were directed on individual wastewater treatment agencies using
an end-of-pipe focus, there was no incentive or interest in a
holistic approach to water quality management decision-making.
Many of the 208 Plans were created without sufficient input from
the agencies that were most affected by them: the wastewater
treatment agencies. It was no wonder there was limited buy-in to
the 208 plans and their intended purpose, holistic planning.
Nevertheless, in the future, a bottoms-up approach, which now
appears to be advocated by many at the federal, regional and
local levels, needs to occur. The 208 Planning process or a
close cousin to it, with SCAG taking the role of the regional
coordinator and information clearinghouse, could help to
facilitate this goal, if local government and the wastewater
treatment agencies are given the primary role of developing
programs and strategies. This is, in fact, what SCAG recommends
in the Water Quality chapter.
CAA Section 176. The second federal-mandate that SCAG points to
as a reason for believing that the Water Quality Element is
mandated is Section 176 of the Clean Air Act. Section 176(c)
states that:
"No department, agency, or instrumentality of the Federal
Government shall engage in, support in any way or provide
financial assistance for, license or permit, or approve, any
activity which does not conform to an implementation plan. .
(for achieving the requirements of the Clean Air Act) . . .No
metropolitan planning organization designated under section
134 of title 23 of the USC shall give its approval to any
project, program, or plan which does not conform to an
implementation plan approved or promulgated. . (in support of
achieving the requirements of the Clean Air Act) . "
For the Districts, federal approval is necessary for our ocean
discharge permit because it is jointly issued by the
Environmental Protection Agency and the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board. This places the Districts under the
conformity requirement of the CAA and the region's air quality
compliance plan. Districts' staff believe that the conformity
process suggested by SCAG in the Water Quality chapter, (which,
incidentally is simply a restatement of the wastewater conformity
criteria now existing in the 1991 SIP) , is reasonable, except for
11
the one issue of concern discussed above (pacing wastewater
facilities construction with population projections) . There are
two tests of conformity:
1. Wastewater treatment facilities must be sized and
service-phased according to the population projections for
the service area adopted or approved by SCAG.
2 . The wastewater treatment agency must have a monitoring
and reporting system for projects within the service area
for sharing information with other regional and local
agencies, and for reporting information to SCAG.
As the Water Quality chapter points out, there is a complication
to these conformity criteria. The Environmental Protection
Agency has developed regulations for conformity to implement
Section 176 of the CAA. Final Rule-making was issued in November
1993 that obligates wastewater treatment plants subject to
federal approval, permits or grants to be in conformity with the
air quality management plan of the region (known as the State
Implementation Plan, or SIP) .
In the absence of completely escaping conformity requirements
altogether, the Water Quality Element chapter takes a reasonable
approach to this requirement, if the language of test #1 is
modified to recognize the desirability of proactive and cost-
effective wastewater treatment facility planning, design and
construction.
SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGING THE SCAG RCP WATER QUALITY
CHAPTER LANGUAGE
Districts' staff have specifically recommended changes to the
December 1993 draft version of Chapter 11 of the Regional
Comprehensive Plan. Suggested additions are in bold. Suggested
(deletions] are in brackets.
Starting at Page 11-19, 2nd paragraph:
8. Wastewater treatment agency facility planning and
facility development should be consistent with population
projections contained in the RCP, while taking into account
the need to build wastewater treatment facilities in cost-
effective increments of capacity, the need to build well
enough in advance to reliably meet unanticipated service and
stormwater demands, and the need to provide standby capacity
for public safety and environmental protection objectives.
12
Starting at Page 11-19, 4th paragraph:
Second, consistency between wastewater capacity expansion
and population projections helps ensure that increases in
capacity [do not unnecessarily out pace projections of
future population and development. Capacity expansions may
serve as an inducement to development and growth in a manner
that is contrary to region's air quality goals. ] for those
projects and facilities subject to federal approval are in
positive conformity with the region's applicable air quality
management plan. [EPA recognized] Congress requires this
in the federal Clean Air Act. Section 316 of the Act gives
EPA the authority to withhold grants for sewage treatment
works construction if such construction does not conform
with the region's air quality plan. In addition, Section
176 of the Act prohibits any federal agency from providing
financial assistance, licensing, permitting or approving any
activity that does not conform with a region's air plan.
[This section also prohibits a metropolitan planning agency,
such as SCAG, from granting approval of a project, program,
or plan that does not conform to the air plan. ] However, if
this is so interpreted to interfere with a public wastewater
treatment agency subject to federal conformity requirements
ability to conduct its master planning efforts to
proactively build needed facilities, then this becomes a
classic example of contradictory public policy.
While it is certainly important to meet air quality
objectives in this region, it is equally important that
wastewater treatment agencies meet their objectives of
protecting public health and the environment. This can only
be done by proactively constructing the facilities necessary
to meet the objectives of the Clean Water Act, a 208 Plan, a
comprehensive watershed management plan or the stated policy
objectives of a public wastewater treatment agency. For
this reason, it is the stated policy of SCAG to encourage
and support those wastewater facilities planning and
construction efforts that are intended to proactively
address service, reliability, environmental and cost-
effectiveness demands.
Starting at Page 11-20:
1 . Upon issuance of the final RCP, SCAG, after
consultation with wastewater treatment agencies in the
region, will modify (if necessary) and then [allocate]
adjust up or down the growth projections contained in
the growth management component of the RCP by the
service area of each wastewater treatment agency in the
SCAG region.
13
4 . (F) acility plans adopted by the governing board of a
wastewater treatment agency found to be consistent with
the SLAG-adopted population projections will be
incorporated into the water quality component of the
regional comprehensive plan. For those facility plans
adopted by the governing board of a wastewater
treatment agency that are apparently inconsistent with
the SCAG-adopted population projects, SCAG will consult
with the wastewater treatment agency to reconcile the
inconsistency to the satisfaction of the governing
board of the wastewater treatment agency. If
reconciliation fails to occur, then the existence of
the wastewater facility plan will be noted within an
amendment to the SCAG-adopted population projections
and the two contradictory positions will be described
within the water quality component of the regional
comprehensive plan.
5. Conformity determinations for specific facilities
subject to the conformity provisions of Section 176 of
the CAA will not be necessary if the specific
facilities are constructed in accordance with a
facility plan that has been found to be consistent with
the SCAG-adopted population projections of the water
quality component of the regional comprehensive plan.
For specific facilities subject to the conformity
provisions of Section 176 of the CAA and not
constructed in accordance with such a facilities plan,
conformity determinations will be conducted consistent
with the ( 1991 conformity guidelines. ] the most recent
adopted conformity guidelines. SCAG will evaluate
these guidelines to reflect the most recent regulations
adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency
regarding conformity, and the changes to the State
Implementation Plan that follow. The ( 1991] SCAG
guidelines will , in cooperation with wastewater
treatment agencies, be revised accordingly by SCAG. In
any case, SCAG will take a balanced view of wastewater
treatment facilities planning and construction by
recognizing that competing with any federal, state or
regional mandates for achieving clean air objectives
are the equally important federal, state, regional and
local mandates to achieve clean water objectives and to
meet the long-term service demands of the community
served by wastewater treatment facilities.
14
FUTURE ACTIONS BY DISTRICTS' STAFF
Districts' staff will continue to monitor the progress on the
completion of the Regional Comprehensive Plan and will maintain
close consultation with the local and county government staff
here in Orange County as well as the staff of our sister
wastewater treatment agencies in the SCAG region. Staff will
report to the Executive Committee when new drafts of the RCP are
created by SCAG staff.
BPA:ahh
REF regcomp
Attachment
15
FILE UUFY
DRAFT
REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
December 1993
Stan draft reWased rcr public review prior to coruitlerolion for oc7ion by SLAG Regional Council.
nmwcnwouu�pOC1�11011p�MMt.IN
WATER QUALITY
• Introduction
• Purpose of the Water Quality Chapter
• Current Water Quality Goals and Objectives Under Existing Federal and State Law
• Water Resources in the SCAG Region
• Water Quality in the SCAG Region
• Current Framework for Water Quality Planning and Management
• Regional Issues for Improved Water Quality Planning and Management
• Recommendations and Policy Options
• Integration of Water Quality and Other Regional Issues
A. INTRODUCTION
While providing an adequate supply of water has long been one of the primary challenges facing the
region, maintaining the quality of the water in the region has become an increasingly important issue. Water
serves many functions in the region. It is used by households for drinking and other purposes; it is relied
upon by turners to irrigate crops; it is critical to commercial and industrial operations. It also provides
important recreational benefits, for activities such as swimming, fishing, surfing and sailing. Aesthetically,
Southern California's rivers, streams, lakes, and oceans are an integral pan of the natural landscape that has
long drawn people to the region.
Maintaining clean water is an important goal for the future success of Southern California. Yet, the historical
growth and urbanization in the SCAG region has often adversely affected water resources. More people have
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
meant more sewage, and increased amounts of wastewater discharged into our water bodies. Urbanization
has altered many of the natural filtration systems that maintain the quality of the water and has increased the
amount of runoff pollution. Past industrial practices have left major underground aquifers unusable; aquifers
that are relied upon by millions of residents for their drinking water.
Recent years, however, have resulted in many changes leading to improved water quality. With the
assistance of federal funding, wastewater treatment has drastically improved during the past 15 years. New
hazardous waste management practices have significantly reduced the likelihood that current industrial
practices will contaminate groundwater supplies. Also, there is a growing awareness and scientific
understanding of the relationship among water quality, the surrounding habitat, and land use. While the
successes are noteworthy, new challenges still remain in the region. These issues include addressing and
financing the control of non-point source pollution, such as stormwater runoff; paying for the cleanup of
contaminated groundwater basins; and balancing the costs of water pollution control with other regional
objectives. 71is chapter examines these and other issues.
Under Section 209 of the Clean Water Act, SCAG is the designated agency responsible for developing a
Waste Treatment Management Plan for the region. The 208 plan is designed to provide a comprehensive
planning framework for both point and nonpoint source water pollution. Specific planning requirements
include, but are not limited to, identifying needed treatment works to meet anticipated needs over a 20 year
period, the identification of contruction priorities for the region, procedures and methods to control nonpoint
source pollution from agriculture, mining and other sources. SCAG prepared the Areawide Waste Treatment
Management Plan in 1979 and made amendments to the plan in 1981. This chapter, while not a
comprehensive update to the 208 plan, addresses similar issues, including a regional framework for the
expansion of wastewater treatment capacity.
B. PURPOSE OF THE WATER QUALITY CHAPTER
The water quality chapter is not intended to be a prescriptive plan for addressing water quality issues in the
region. Many public agencies in the region have responsibility for planning for and maintaining the quality
of the region's water. Instead, the chapter is intended to provide a regional perspective on current water
quality issues and the plans and programs for addressing these issues, and to better clarify the relationship
between water quality and other regional concerns. Accordingly, the chapter is intended to accomplish the
following:
• Identify the current water quality goals and objectives for the region as established under existing law.
• Provide an inventory of current water quality problem areas in the region.
• Identify and describe the various plans and programs affecting water quality in Southern California.
• Raise some regional issues associated with maintaining and improving water quality in the region
including issues in which water quality goals and policies interact with other regional goals and policies.
• Provide a framework for ensuring that growth in wastewater treatment capacity is consistent with
regional growth projections.
Page 11-2 0 December, 1993 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
• Provide recommendations and policy options for improving the region's water quality and the current
system for managing water quality.
C. CURRENT WATER QUALITY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
UNDER EXISTING FEDERAL AND STATE LAW
Both the federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly referred to as the 'Clean Water Act') and the state
law on water quality (the Poner-Cologne Water Quality Act) establish goals and objectives for water quality.
These two laws provide much of the legal basis for clean water programs in the region and, therefore, the
goals and objectives established in these laws guide most of the region's clean water programs.
1 . GOALS
The Clean Water Act was initially passed in 1972 and has been amended several time thereafter. The law
creates several regulatory requirements and programs and provides grants to state and local governments to
finance clean water projects. The primary goal of the Clean Water Act is the following:
• To restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's water.'
The,central state law governing water quality is the Poner-Cologne Water Quality Act. The Act was passed
in 1970 and established the State Water Resources Control Board and the various Regional Water Quality
Control Boards, the primary state agencies responsible for maintaining water quality. The goal of the State
and Regional Boards under the Porter-Cologne Act can be summarized as follows:
• To achieve and maintain water quality objectives that are necessary to protect all beneficial uses of all
waters.
2. OBJECTIVES
The specific objectives for water quality in the region under current law are identified in the various Regional
Water Quality Control Board Basin Plans. These plans, which are described in more detail below, provide
specific objectives for various water bodies. These objectives are the limits or levels of water quality
constituents or characteristics established for the protection of beneficial uses. Beneficial uses include the
various current or potential uses of a waterbody, including, but not limited to domestic use, agricultural and
industrial supply, power generation, recreation, aesthetic navigation, and preservation and enhancement of
fish, wildlife, or other quality resources. Each waterbody may have a different set of beneficial uses and,
therefore, different water quality objectives.
A summary of the water quality objectives for waterbodies in the SCAG region as contained in the Regional
Basin Plaru is included in the background document for the Water Quality chapter.
'See Federal Water Pollution Control Act. I 101 M.
SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 0 Page 11-3
Chapter Eleven a Water Quality
D. WATER RESOURCES IN THE SCAG REGION
Despite the perception that the Southern California region has little of its own water, the area includes a wide
array of rivers, lakes, streams, groundwater basins and, of course, oceans. The major surface water features
of the region are identified in the map in Figure 1I-1. The water resources in the region include the
following.
1 . SURFACE WATER
Surface water refers to the system of lakes, rivers, streams, and creeks in the region. These systems can be
divided into hydrologic basins, or integrated systems that drain a specific area. Many of the surface water
systems in the region have been developed into a series of dams, flood control channels, and spreading
grounds. Hence, only a portion of the natural runoff actually flows through these river systems to the ocean.
In several riven, discharges from wastewater treatment punts may provide the majority of water flow during
the dry season.
The Santa Clara River Basin includes the Ventura and Santa Clara rivers. The Ventura River has Marilljo
Lake and Lake Caritas on its tributaries. The main channel of the Santa Clara River has no lakes or
reservoirs, although two of the Santa Clm's tributaries, Carfaic and Pint have been dammed. Lake
Hughes, Munz Lake, and Eirabeth late have been created by the San Andreas Fault. Elizabeth Lake
drains into Castaic Lake. Another tributary of the Santa Clara, Piru Creek, flows into both Pyramid Lake
and Lake Piru. Sespe Creek also drains a considerable area.
The Los Angeles River and the San Gabriel River are considered to be one hydrologic basin. The
headwaters of the San Gabriel River and tributaries of the Los Angeles River rise in the San Gabriel
Mountains. Prior to extensive urbanization during this century, these two rivers descended to a low-lying
area of extensive wetlands before flowing into the ocean. Open bodies of water within the basin are nearly
all dammed reservoirs. The Cogswell Reservoir, Morris Reservoir along with the San Gabriel Reservoir in
San Gabriel Canyon control and retain much of the runoff from the San Gabriel River before it exits the
canyon and the Santa Fe Dam and Whittier Narrows provide flood control further down the river.
The Rio Hondo connects the San Gabriel River from the Whittier Narrows Dam. Reservoirs, such as
Chatsworth, Los Angeles, Pacoima, Stone Canyon, Franklin, Hollywood, and Puddingsmne, are important
both for storage and for recreation, but are not extensive in area. Separate from the Los Angeles and San
Gabriel drainage systems, Malibu Creek drains a significant portion of the Santa Monica Mountains.
The Santa Am River drainage can be divided into an upper basin and a lower basin. The drainage of upper
reaches of the Santa Ana is retained by Big Bear Valley Dam. The Santa Ana and Md! Creek, have carved
very steep canyons and exit the mountains into the Bunker Hill basin. Cajon Creek and Lyde Creek also
charge this basin. Silvemood late is a terminus of the California Aqueduct. This water is channeled
through an eight-mile.tumel to provide a source of hydroelectric power to Devil's Canyon power plant, and
then is piped to lake Perris.
Page 11-4 0 December, 1993 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
1L� 4.1 5
J bbff
r
Ih ,
il! f
J
l
off
d ,
. ff fl,
O
d
SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 0 Page 11-5
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
The middle reaches of the Santa Ana River are perennial only because of waste treatment plant effluent. All
the drainage of the Eastern San Gabriel Mountains - San Antonio Creek, Day's Creek, Etiwanda Creek, Deer
Creek and Cucamonga Creek - are modified as storm drains and channeled to the El Prado Dam. lake
Matthews and Lake Perris provide storage for Colorado River water and State Water Project water,
respectively. lake Elsinore and Railroad Canyon Reservoir are other surface bodies of water within this
basin.
Lower Basin drainage is dominated by the flood control dam at El Prado. The Santa Ana Canyon, which
separates the Chino Hills from the Santa Ana Mountains is the major drainage of heavily urbanized Orange
County. The lower Santa Ana has been channelized and modified so that in most years flows do not reach the
sea, but are used to recharge groundwater. Small portions of wetlands still remain in Orange County, Bolsa
Chia, and the Upper Newport Bay area.
The Mojave River rises in the San Bernardino Mountains and flows north and then eastward to the Mojave
Sink. The Mojave River is very important to the growing High Desert communities as it is the only reliable
source of ground water. lake Arrowhead is a reservoir on one of the Mojave River tributaries.
Whilewater River drains the eastern flanks of the San Gorgonio and collects drainage from the San Jacinto
mountains. The Canyons of the Anza-Borrego State Park contain seeps and springs. The Whitewater River
becomes the main drainage of the Coachella Valley to the Salton Sea, a large saline body of water. The
Salton Sea was created by severe flooding that poured Colorado River waters into the below sea-level
depression for almost two years (1905-07). The Salton Sea also receives drainage from the New River, which
crosses the border from Mexico. Finally, on the eastern border of the SCAG region runs the Colorado
River, which supplies a significant amount of agricultural and drinking water to the region.
2. GROUNDWATER
The SCAG region contains many large groundwater basins. Prior to the development of the Los Angeles
Aqueduct, groundwater served as the primary source of potable water. Even with the development of
imported water supplies, groundwater continues to provide a significant portion of the region's water. Major
groundwater basins in the region include the Central, Raymond, San Fernando, Central, West Coast and
San Gabriel in Los Angeles County; the Upper Santa Ana Valley Basin system including Bunker Hill, and
China Basins in San Bernardino and Riverside counties; the Coastal Plain Basin in Orange County; the
Coachella Volley Basin in Riverside County; and the Oxnard Plain Basin in Ventura County.
3. OCEANS AND ESTUARIES
Perhaps Southern California's most important natural attribute is the Pacific Ocean. The coastline of the
SCAG region contains many unique bays, harbors, and estuaries. Starting from the north, these include the
estuary at the mouth of the Santa Clara River where wastewater flows maintain a wetland/estuary
environment. Further south, lies the Santa Monica Bay, the largest indentation on the Southern California
coastline. The Bay extends north from Point Dume above Malibu to the Palos Verdes Peninsula in the South.
Within the Santa Monica Bay is Marina Del Rey, a large man-made recreational marina. The marina lies
adjacent to Balloua Creek, a channelized waterway that receives a significant amount of the urban runoff
Pace 11-6 0 December, 1993 SCAG • Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
draining directly into the Santa Monica Bay. Further south in the Bay is Ring Harbor in Redondo Beach,
another recreational marina.
On the southern side of the Palos Verdes Peninsula lies the Los Angeles and Long Beach harbors, two of the
busiest commercial harbors in the world. The Los Angeles River, which carries the majority of Los Angeles
County's urban runoff, as well as wastewater flows from inland treatment plants, flows into the ocean at this
point. Further south is Newport Bay, which is an enclosed estuary with extensive development in and around
the Bay.
4. WETLANDS
Wetlands are unique areas in which the water table is essentially at the same level as the land. Wetlands
include marshes, swamps, bogs, and playa lakes. In recent years, the environmental importance of wetlands
have become better known. Wetlands provide habitat for a large number of plants and species and also serve
as natural filters, cleansing water of many pollutants. In addition, wetlands function as natural flood control
systems, absorbing much of the overflow water from rivers and streams. The SCAG region, particularly the
coastal plains, were once home to vast acreage of wetlands. Today, estimates indicate that in some areas,
more than 90 percent of the wetlands have been lost. However, wetland areas still exist around Ballona
Creek in Los Angeles, in coastal areas of undeveloped portions of Orange County and in other areas in the
region.
5. IMPORTED WATER
Imported water is used throughout the region for drinking, agricultural, and industrial purposes. It also
provides water for groundwater recharge and for recreational uses. Imported water in Southern California
comes from three sources: the Stare Rater Project, which carries water from the Sacramento Bay Delta area,
the Colorado River Aqueduct, and the Las Angeles Aqueduct, which imports water from the Owens Valley
and Mono Basin. In addition, new federal legislation will allow the region greater access to water from
another source, the Central Valley Project. A detailed discussion of these imported sources is provided in the
Water Resources chapter.
E. WATER QUALITY IN THE SCAG REGION
How is the quality of the water in the SCAG region? The most direct source for answering this question is
the State Water Quality Assessment (SWQA) Report. The SWQA Report is a compilation of Regional
Quality Assessment Reports that are adopted first by each regional water quality control board. The report is
prepared every 2 years and it used to satisfy various federal reporting requirements under the Clean Water
Act. The report is generated from a Water Quality Assessment Database which is maintained at the Regional
Board and is updated as new information is available.
This report provides a general assessment of the quality of waterbodies in the State. The SWQA classifies
each waterbody into one of three categories:
• Good-Quality Water,
SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 • Page 11-7
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
• Intermediate-Quality Water, and
• Impaired-Quality Water.
A fourth classification of Unknown-Quality Water is used when observations are not available. Each
waterbody is also identified by its type, including estuaries, groundwater, lakes and reservoirs, oceans and
open bays, rivers and streams, saline lakes, and wetlands. All these waterbody types exist in the SCAG
region and a significant number of them have been identified as having Impaired-Water-Quality. The
summary tables for the SWQA for waterbodies in the SCAG region are included as an appendix to the
Background Document. Major waterbodies identified as impaired include the following:
1 . RIVERS AND STREAMS
Major rivers in the region include the Santa Clara River, Los Angeles River, San Gabriel River, Santa Ana
River, Mojave River, Whitewater River, New River, and the Colorado River. Some of these rivers are
intermittent (i.e., they are dry for parts of the year) and many parts of them have been channelized for flood
prevention purposes, particularly around urban areas. The Colorado River, which borders the Southeastern
portion of the region, is a major source of drinking and irrigation supply water for Southern California.
Much of the water that flows through some of these rivers (particularly those in the urbanized areas) is
effluent from wastewater treatment plants. Over the course of a river or stream, various inputs from either
point (e.g., wastewater or industrial facilities) or from non-point (agricultural or stormwater runoff) can
change the quality of the water in the river. Thus, most of the rivers contain reaches with water quality
characteristics ranging from good through intermediate to impaired. Of particular concern in the region is
the New River, which suffers from significant contamination from poorly treated wastewater and industrial
discharges from Mexico.
2. LAKES
The region's largest inland waterbody, the Salton Sea, has significant water quality problems. The Sea is
essentially a man-made waterbody, supported by inflows from agricultural return flows. The Sea lacks an
outlet and the water level is maintained through evaporation. This evaporation leaves behind salts and, thus,
the salinity in the sea is constantly increasing, which impacts both fish and riparian habitat. In addition, toxic
contamination is a concern in the Sea, due in large part to discharges from Mexican facilities into the New
River. In addition, recently implemented conservation practices may reduce the amount of fresh water that
flows to, and sustains the Salton Sea.
3. OPEN OCEANS AND BAYS
Santa Monica Bay, which extends from Malibu to the Palos Verdes Peninsula, has impaired water quality as
the result of several sources. Past wastewater disposal practices included the dumping of large amounts of
PCBs, DDTs, and heavy metals into the Bay, which have led to persistent contamination problems in
sediments, biota, and seafood. The Bay continues to receive the majority of the region's effluent from
wastewater treatment plants. In addition, stormwater pollution, which drains directly into the Bay, may be
the major current source of pollution.
Page 11-8 9 December, 1993 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan
Chapter Eleven • Water Guality
4. GROUNDWATER
Several of the major groundwater basins, relied upon by millions of residents and businesses for potable
water, suffer from contamination from past industrial and agricultural practices and from problems due to
overdraft. Contamination from common industrial organic solvents, including trichloreythlene(TCE),
perchloroethylene (PCE), and from nitrates has been found in may of the major groundwater basins
underlying Los Angeles County. Widespread contamination has been discovered in both the San Fernando
Valley and San Gabriel Valley basins. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has declared both
basins 'Superfund' sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response and Liability Act (CERCLA).
Remediation work directed by EPA to extract and treat the contaminated water has begun in the San Fernando
Valley. Remediation work has yet to begin in the San Gabriel Valley, although the San Gabriel Basin Water
Quality Authority has developed a plan to provide a comprehensive, locally based, solution to the
contamination problem.
Other impaired groundwater basins include the Ventura City-Oxnard Plain Basin, which suffers from
saltwater intrusion due to continued pumping; the Chino and Middle Santa Ana basins, which have been
affected by agricultural and dairy practices; and the Mojave Basin, which has wide variations in the water
table from excessive pumping and contamination from past waste disposal practices.
5. BAYS AND HARBORS
The state's water quality assessment identifies several bays and harbors in the region with impaired water
quality. These include Alamitos Bay, King Harbor, Long Beach Harbor, Los Angeles Harbor, Marina Del
Rey, and Port Hueneme. A common problem with these bays and harbors includes heavy metal
contamination of sediments. Impacts to biota is often significant in these bays and harbors, and has led to
health advisories due to elevated levels of contamination in shellfish tissues.
6. ESTUARIES
Estuaries include the area's tidal prisms and tidal wetlands. Those identified as impaired include Ballona
Wetlands, Colorado Lagoon, Dominguez Channel Tidal Prism, Los Angeles River Tidal Prism, Malibu
Lagoon, Mugu Lagoon, San Gabriel River Tidal Prism, Santa Clara River Estuary, and the Ventura River
Estuary. These estuaries suffer from similar problems as the bays and harbors—clevated heavy metal
levels—and also have potential problems with eutrophiution. In addition, significant alteration of wetlands
from development has created habitat and species problems in areas such as the Ballona Wetlands.
F. CURRENT FRAMEWORK FOR WATER QUALITY PLANNING
AND MANAGEMENT
Who is responsible for planning and managing water quality in Southern California? The answer to this
question is not as simple as it might appear. Numerous federal, state, and local governmental entities in one
way or another are vested with responsibilities that affect water quality. In addition, private businesses and
organizations also have significant legal requirements to ensure that their activities do not adversely affect
water quality.
.cC4l; 0 Draft Raninnal Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 0 Page 11-9
Chapter Eleven o Water Quality
One of the purposes of this water quality chapter is to identify the agencies with planning are management
responsibilities for water quality in the region. The Background Document to this chapter provides a more
detailed identification of the various responsible agencies as well as descriptions of their functions and
responsibilities.
The primary regional planning documents for water quality in the SCAG region are the basin plans prepared
by the State Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs). Four such plans, which also include
specific regulatory controls, cover most of the water resources in the SCAG region. The purpose and
structure of these basin plans is described below.
While these plans are important parts of the water planning and management process, they do not cover many
of the planned activities in the region for improving water quality. Thus, this chapter identifies the additional
major organizations, primarily public sector, that have water quality planning and management responsibilities
within the SCAG region. The list of organizations contained in this document is not intended to be
exhaustive. However, it provides an overview of the intricate and sometimes diffuse nature of water quality
planning and management in the SCAG region.
1. REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD BASIN PLANS
The primary planning documents for improving water quality in the SCAG region are prepared by the State
Regional Water Quality Control Boards. There are nine RWQCBs throughout the State of California. Su of
these boards overlap with the SCAG boundaries (see Figure 11-2). Of these six, almost all of the SCAG
region is covered by four boards: the Los Angeles Region (No. 4), the Santa Ana Region (No. 8), the
Lahontan Region (No. 6), and the Colorado River Basin Region (No. 7). In addition to the regional boards,
the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) is responsible for establishing statewide policy on water
quality issues. Both the SWRCB and the regional boards are part of the California Environmental Protection
Agency (Cal-EPA).
The regional boards have primary responsibility for implementing the state Porter-Cologne Water Quality
Act, the major water quality legislation in California, and the CWA. Responsibilities under both of these acts
include developing 'basin plan for the regions, which provide objectives for improving or maintaining
water quality, and issuing water quality permits to dischargers.
The Porter-Cologne Act divests each regional board to '... formulate and adopt water quality control plans
for all areas within the region." There are three fundamental components in these plans:
1. Establishment of Beneficial Uses. In the basin plan, each regional board must identify the 'beneficial
uses' of each water body. Beneficial uses are the various ways in which a water body may be used and
include such activities as municipal and domestic water supply, agricultural supply, groundwater
recharge, industrial supply, hydropower generation, wildlife and aquatic habitat, and recreational uses.
2. Establishment of Water Ouality Objectives Water quality objectives are the limits or levels of water
constituents or characteristics established to protect beneficial uses. These objectives can either be
4Vatar Code 1113000-13999.1 S.
Page 11-10 • December, 1993 SCAG • Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan
0
ngum 11.2
California Regional Water Control Boards in the SCAG Region
----------------------------
b �
6
1
o
Lahontan Region
N ;
4 ;
Lo' Angeles
�., ,Region _ - ------- - - -
."'^----.r'--- --------------------.----
anta Ana 7
a
Ripgion
Colorado _
m
w - - - - -River Basin
Region
Q
-------._.
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
expressed in narrative or numerical form. In addition, the objectives can apply to all water bodies or
types of water bodies in the region or to a specific water body. When combined with beneficial uses,
water quality objectives establish the specific standards that must be met for a water body.
3. Implementation Plan The implementation plan describes the programs, projects, and other actions
necessary to achieve the objectives established in the basin plan. The primary mechanism for
implementing the point source portions of the basin plan is through issuing and enforcing waste discharge
and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permits to entities discharging waste
water to either the land or to a water body. In addition, the boards implement non-point source loan
programs, issue NPDES permits for stormwater, and oversee groundwater remediation projects.
Implementation measures for nonpoint source discharges are carried out in accordance with the state's
'Nonpoint Source Management Plan' as adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board in 1988.
Basin plans are in effect for all four of the regional boards that cover most of the SCAG region. The Porter-
Cologne Act requires regional boards to review and, if necessary, update these plans every three years
(known as the 'triennial review'). Several of the plans in the SCAG region are in the process of being
updated. The curtent status of the regional basin plans in covering the SCAG region are as follows:
1. Los Angeles Region, The Los Angeles Region develops basin plans for two areas: the Santa Clara
River Basin and the Los Angeles River Basin. The plans for both of these basins were developed and
adopted by the regional board in 1975. The L.A. Regional Board made some revisions to the plan in
1978, 1990, and 1991. A triennial review of the plan is currently underway that will result in more
comprehensive changes to the 1975 plan. The updated plan is expected to be adopted in early 1994.
2. Santa Ana Region, The Santa Ana Region first adopted its plan in 1975 and then conducted a complete
update of the plan in 1983. The Santa Ana Regional Board is in the process of updating the plan again
and is expected to adopt a revised regional plan between late 1993 and early 1994.
3. Colorado River Region. The Colorado River Regional Board adopted its most recent basin plan in 19,91
and is working on an update to the plan to be released by the end of 1993.
4. Lahontan Region, The Lahontan Region adopted its basin plan in 1975 and has amended the plan
several times since then. The Lahontan Board is currently undertaking a revision to the basin plan.
2. OTHER PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
Numerous other governmental agencies have planning and management responsibilities in the SCAG region.
They include federal, state, regional, and local agencies that implement programs relating either directly or
indirectly to maintaining water quality. These agencies and their responsibilities are identified in Figure 11-3.
The specific responsibilities and activities are described in more detail in the background document for this
chapter.
Page 11-12 • December, 1993 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
Figure 11-3 3
Partial List of Agencies with Water Quality
Planning and Management Responsibilities
in the SCAG Region
A. Federal Agencies
1. Environmental Protection Agency
2. Army Corp of Engineers
3. Department of the Interior
a. Bureau of Reclamation
b. U.S-Fish and Wildlife Service
c. National Park Service
d. Bureau of land Management
d- U.S. Geological Survey
C U.S. Forest Service
4. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
5. U.S. Coast Guard
6. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service
B. State Agencies
1. California Environmental Protection Agency
a. State Water Resources Control Board
b. Regional Water Quality Control Boards
e. Department of Toxic Substances Control
it. Department of Pesticide Regulation
e. Integrated Waste Management Board
crn r- e n.a fr Rpoional Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 0 Page 11-13
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
Figure 11-3 (continued) d
Partial List of Agencies with Water Quality
Planning and Management Responsibilities
in the SCAG Region (continued)
B. State Agencies (Cont'd)
2. California Resources Agency
a. Department of Water Resources
b. Department of Fish and Game
c. California Coastal Commission
it. State Coastal Conservancy
e. Colorado River Board of California
3. Department of Health Services, Office of Drinking Water
C. Regional and Local Agenda
1. City and County General Purpose Governments
2. Comprehensive Regional Planning Organizations
3. Single Purpose Agencies
a. Wastewater Treatment Agencies
b. Water Supply Agencies
(1) Metropolitan Water District
(2) Wholesale Water Suppliers Outside of MWD Service Area
(3) Retall Water Agencies
c. Flood Control Districts
d. Irrigation Districts
e. Resource Conservation Districts
f. Water Replenishment Districts
g. Water Masters
h. Others
(1) San Gabriel Basin Water Quality Authority
(2) Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority -
(3) Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project.
(4) Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
Page 11-14 • December, 1993 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
G. REGIONAL ISSUES FOR IMPROVED WATER QUALITY
PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT
Numerous important issues face the region as it strives to maintain and improve its water quality. This
chapter of the RCP identifies and discusses several of these issues. They include:
1 . Implications of Continued Growth in the South Coast Region
The SCAG region has experienced population and urban growth throughout the past quarter-century
unparalleled anywhere in the United States. Projections indicate that growth is likely to continue throughout
the next 15 to 20 years. This growth presents several water quality problems. It creates an increased
demand for wastewater treatment services as additional development and additional residents generate more
wastewater. Continued growth, particularly as it includes increased urbanization, will also affect the amount
and quality of storm-water runoff, a major source of water pollution in the region. In addition, the growing
population will require more drinking water, and potentially exacerbate the water quality problems associated
with increasing water supplies. Since the issuance of the 208 plan in 1979, the region has lacked a
comprehensive framework for planning for future wastewater treatment plant development and expansion.
Current 'conformity' procedures exist, under the mandates of the federal Clean Air Act, to ensure that
individual development or expansion projects are not in conflict with regional air quality objectives. The
process of ensuring conformity with the regions air quality and water quality objectives will be facilitated by
updating the information in the 208 plan regarding population projections for the regions wastewater facility
service areas. Such an update, conducted in cooperation with local wastewater treatment agencies, is to be
included as part of the RCP process.
2. FUTURE NON-POINT SOURCE MANAGEMENT
Nonpoint source pollution, and in particular stormwater runoff, is increasingly becoming the most significant
water pollution source in the region, particularly for coastal waters. Agriculture is also a large generator of
nonpoint source pollution. The federal, state, and local programs and resources dedicated toward water
quality, however, have traditionally had a primary focus on point sources (.e., discharges from wastewater
treatment facilities and industries). While this attention to point-source pollution has resulted in considerable
positive improvements in water quality, emphasis on nonpoint sources will be crucial to making additional
and needed progress. Such an emphasis on noupoint sources, however, will require significant resources. A
comprehensive analysis of the potential costs associated with nonpoint source pollution control is needed,
along with an identification of potential sources for this funding. Such an analysis will facilitate future
discussions in the region regarding policy options for addressing nonpoint source pollution.
In addition, because of the relative importance of nonpoint source pollution, the region will need to evaluate
the resources it currently expends on water pollution control to consider, (1) whether the total amount is
disproportionately spent on point sources, and (2) whether changes in where the money is spent need to be
considered to maximize public benefits. In addition, planning for the control and quality improvement of
nonpoint source pollution needs to be more fully integrated into the local planning process. Additional
attention in local general plan development focusing on the nonpoint source pollution issue is critical in
effective control of this significant source of pollution.
SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 6 Page 11-15
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
3. WATERSHEDS AS A PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK
A growing consensus exists among the water pollution community that more effective planning and
management of water quality could be achieved through a process of 'comprehensive watershed
management.' A watershed is the system of creeks, streams, and rivers that flow into a common water body
and includes the associated riparian habitat. Watersheds are distinct ecosystems, such that changes to one part
of the system can have effects on other parts. For example, changes in the riparian vegetation to a stream
that eventually flows into a lake can increase the pollutant loading to that stream and impair the water quality
of the lake.
The traditional planning and management of water quality has focused primarily on ind6jd ua___ aLwat••!�'•&.
In addition, coordination among the water pollution agencies, various land use agencies, water supply
agencies, and other public entities that affect a watershed has been sporadic. In watershed management, both
public and private agencies that rely upon or manage components of a water body, work in a cooperative
fashion to determine the best strategy for improving water quality in the watershed. 7bese 'stakeholders'
jointly determine the problems in the watershed, search for consensus on the actions to be taken, and then
implement those actions in an integrated fashion. Such cooperative effort wfll lead to more cost-effective
solutions to ensuring that the 'beneficial uses' of the region's waterbodies are maintained.
The Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project (SMBRP) represents an example of watershed management on a
broad scale. The SMBRP is part of the federal National Estuary Program and is required to develop a
comprehensive plan for improving water quality in the bay. This plan is being developed through the
coordinated efforts of federal, state, and local government agencies, industry representatives, and community
and environmental groups. Sintflar types of coordinated actions are developing to address the water quality
problems of the Salton Sea and the Santa Ana River watershed. These watershed management projects serve
as examples to be used for other watersheds in the region.
4. FINANCING GROUNDWATER CLEANUPS
The region faces a significant environmental and economic problem from contaminated groundwater. The
contamination threatens important sources of drinking water for the growing region. In addition, the liability
associated with cleaning up contaminated groundwater poses financial threats to local industries and to local
governments. A coordinated, local-based approach to addressing the groundwater issue in areas such as the
San Gabriel Valley is crucial to the future of the region. Such an approach would leverage the available
federal and state resources to address the problems, while apportioning the local financial burden in an
equitable fashion.
5. REDUCING REGULATORY OVERLAP
The watershed management approaches, as described above, wfll require agencies at all level of governments
to work together in a cooperative fashion. This chapter identifies some of the many agencies that affect water
quality in the region. As the region faces the difficult problems posed by nonpoint source pollution, the
ability for these agencies to work together effectively, while avoiding unnecessary duplication, will be crucial.
Page 11-16 0 December, 1993 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
H. RECOMMENDATIONS AND POLTCY OPTIONS
To improve the planning and management of water quality in the SCAG region, this chapter offers several
recommendations. These recommendations include actions or activities that can be undertaken by regional
entities, such as SCAG, as well as policies and programs that can be explored by other agencies, particularly
at the state and federal level. These recommendations include the following:
1. Water quality regulatory implementation should be streamlined and overlaps with other regulatory
programs should be identified and eliminated to reduce economic impacts on local businesses.
Discussion: This Water Quality chapter is a first step at a comprehensive identification of the various
water-related agencies in the SCAG region. The continuation of this effort along with other state and
regional streamlining projects is critical to improving water quality in the region in the most cost-
efficient manner. Such efforts include streamlining permitting process, including the integration of water
permitting into ongoing 'one-stop' permitting efforts and reducing overlaps in the overlapping
responsibilities of water quality and other agencies in such areas as solid waste facility permitting and
inspections.
2. 'Watershed management' programs and strategies should be encouraged, recognizing the primary role of
local governments in such efforts.
Discussion: Watershed management can be encouraged in several ways. Changes to current federal and
state law for water quality should be amended to incorporate watershed management as an integral part
of state and federal water quality programs. These watershed management efforts should facilitate local
decision-making in establishing the water quality objectives for a water body and the strategies for
achieving those objectives, including the appropriate public expenditures on point source control and
nonpoint source control, strategies for wedands enhancement, and funding approaches. In addition,
federal and state funding of water quality projects should be targeted at recommendations stemming from
water quality planning efforts and should be flexible to finance a variety of water quality projects.
3. SCAG shall play a coordinating role in watershed management efforts at the subregional level by 1)
providing consistent regional data; 2) serving as a liaison between local watershed efforts at state and
federal agencies; and 3) ensuring that watershed planning is consistent with other planning objectives
(e.g., transportation, air quality, water supply).
Discussion: Watershed management initiatives will be most effective when local governments are
integrated into the decision-making process. The regional comprehensive planning process offers the
opportunity for incorporating an existing local-based decision making system into watershed
management. Existing subregions in SCAG are primarily established along jurisdictional boundaries. As
appropriate watershed management boundaries are identified within the region, the appropriate linkage
with subregional entities should be made so that watershed management can be part of the subregional
Planning process.
SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 • Page 11-17
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
4. Opportunities for pollutant trading and other market-incentive water quality programs as an alternative to
strict command-and-control regulation should be encouraged.
Discussion: Appropriate waterbodies in the region for pollutant trading programs should first be
identified. A pollutant trading system for water quality could operate similar to the RECLAIM program
being considered for air quality. Under such a system, an overall pollutant loading limit for all
dischargers into a water body would be established. Each facility discharging into the waterbody would
be allocated, based on historical discharges, a specific number of credits. These credits allow the facility
to discharge a specified amount of pollutants. The facility can either discharge less than the credits allow
and sell the credits or can buy credits from another facility and discharge more than their original
allocation. A trading system encourages facilities in which it is less expensive to reduce their pollution
to do so while at the same time reducing the costs to facilities that face higher costs. The Los Angeles
and Santa Ana Rivers may be potential candidates. Additional analysis and evaluation should be
conducted to determine whether a pilot project for pollutant trading can be initiated on one of these, or
another appropriate, waterbody.
S. SCAG shall support regional efforts to identify and cooperatively plan for wetlands to facilitate both the
sustaining of the amount and quality of wetlands in the region as well expedite the process for obtaining
wetlands permits.
Discussion. The urban growth in the region has resulted in the loss of vast amounts of wetlands.
Wetlands play an important role in maintaining water quality by providing natural filtration systems. In
addition, wetlands are important habitats for many types of species. However, current efforts at
wetlands protection through the federal permitting process is a piece-meal approach, which can result in
long, sometimes unnecessary, delays in project approval. More regional, cooperative planning for
maintaining and/or improving the region's wetlands is needed. Such an approach would encourage a
regional identification of all wetlands resources and thew relative value and provide a framework for
making future decisions in the region regarding wetlands.
6. Cleaning up contamination in the regions major groundwater aquifers is critical to the long-term
economic and environmental health of the region. The financing of such clean-ups should leverage state
and federal resources and minimize significant impacts on the local economy.
Discussion: The contamination of major aquifers in the SCAG region threatens our long-term water
supply. Because of the unique nature of this contamination Ci.e., hundreds of contributing sources,
numerous water purveyors, and the large population relying on the water source), different approaches
than the application of stringent federal joint-and-several liability are necessary. Current state and
federal proposals for the San Gabriel Basin are important steps in addressing this problem while
maintaining the economic viability of the region.
7. Water reclamation shall be encouraged throughout the region where feasible and appropriate to reduce
reliance on imported water and to reduce wastewater discharges. Current administrative impediments to
increased use of wastewater should be addressed.
Discussion. Water reclamation is a priority in both the Water Quality and Water Resources chapters of
the RCP. The Water Resources chapter projects that a growing percentage of total water supply will
Page 11-18 0 December, 1993 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
come from reclaimed water. To achieve this or higher percentages, current impediments to water
reclamation must be overcome in the region. Tbese impediments include financial obstacles, insufficient
infrastructure, health concerns, and public perception. A regional cooperative effort among water supply
agencies, local governments, public works officials, state and federal agencies, and others should be
initiated to identify and address these impediments.
8. Wastewater treatment agency facility planning and facility development should be consistent with
population projections contained in the RCP. -
Discussion. Ensuring that wastewater capacity planning and development is consistent with SCAG's
population projections serves two important goals. First, it ensures that adequate treatment capacity
exists to manage the region's waste thereby serving an important clean water objective. One of the
primary purposes of the Clean Water Act Section 208 planning process is to ensure that adequate and
environmentally beneficial treatment capacity will be available to meet the demands of a growing
Southern California population. Without such capacity, improperly treated wastewater will contribute w
poor water quality in the region.
Second, consistency between wastewater capacity expansion and population projections helps ensure that
increases in capacity do not unnecessarily out pace projections of future population and development.
Capacity expansions may serve as an inducement to development and growth in a manner that is contrary
to the region's air quality goals. EPA recognized this is the federal Clean Air Act. Section 316 of the
Act gives EPA the authority to withhold grants for sewage treatment works construction if such
concoction does not conform with the region's air quality plan. In addition, Section 176 of the Act
prohibits any federal agency from providing financial assistance, licensing, permitting or approving any
activity that does not conform with a regioW s air plan. This section of the act also prohibits a
metropolitan planting agency, such as SCAG, from granting approval of a project, program, or plan that
does not conform to the air plan. Pursuant to modifications made to this section in the 1990 Clean Air
Act Amendments, EPA is currently in the process of promulgating regulations on the procedures for
determining conformity.
In conjunction with the 1991 air quality plan for the South Coast Air Basin, SCAG developed conformity
procedures for wastewater treatment facilities. These procedures require wastewater facility plans and
projects to meet two criteria before a finding of conformity can be made. First, they must be sized and
service-phased according to the population projections for the service area adopted or approved by
SCAG. Second, the wastewater treatment agency must have a monitoring and reporting system for
projects within its service area. This system must include an on-going process and procedures for
reviewing and commenting on all general development projects, for monitoring development approvals,
for sharing information with other regional and local agencies, and for reporting information to SCAG.
The finding of conformity, as described in the conformity procedures, is to be made in the time the
Regional Water Quality Control Board either issues or renews the NPDES permit for the facility.
Since the development of SCAG's conformity procedures, two changes have occurred. First, questions
have been raised regarding whether the issuance of an NPDES permit by the Regional Water Quality
Control Board constitutes a federal action and, therefore, whether a finding of conformity is required at
the time such a permit is issued. Second, as indicated above, EPA is developing regulations for
conformity to implement Section 176 of the Clean Air Act. Proposed regulations were issued on March
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
15, 1993 and final regulations are anticipated in early 1994. The proposed regulations exempted NPDES
permits from the conformity review, although it is unclear whether this exemption will remain in the
final regulations. Following the promulgation of these final regulations, SCAG will be required to revise
its existing conformity guidelines. It should be noted that specific conformity guidelines adopted as part
of a State Implementation Plan, such as those developed by SCAG, can be more restrictive than the
federal rules.
In light of the uncertainties surrounding the federal conformity requirements, as well as the need to have
a region-wide process for ensuring appropriate wastewater capacity growth, SCAG is proposing the
following actions as a supplement to the existing conformity procedures. Consistent with the philosophy
underlying the RCP, this process emphasizes cooperative efforts between local agencies (i.e., wastewater
treatment facilities) and SCAG. Under this process, SCAG will allocate its growth projections by each
wastewater treatment service area in the region and work cooperatively with wastewater treatment
agencies to ensure that facility plans are consistent with such growth projections. Such an effort is
designed to minimize the need for conformity review for specific projects.
Actiors
The following actions are proposed:
1. Upon issuance of the final RCP, SCAG will allocate the growth projections contained in the growth
management component of the RCP by the service area of each wastewater treatment agency in the
SCAG region.
2. SCAG, in conjunction with wastewater treatment agencies in the region, will review existing facility
plans to ensure that the population, housing, and employment projections underlying these plans are
consistent with the SCAG-adopted projections.
3. In instances in which wastewater treatment facility plans are not consistent with SCAG-adopted
growth projections, SCAG will work with such agencies to either: 1) modify facility plans to
conform with the growth projections, or 2) revaluate the growth projections for the wastewater
treatment agency service area, or 3) both.
4. Facility plans found to be consistent with the SCAG-adopted population projections will be
incorporated into the water quality component of the regional comprehensive plan.
5. Conformity determinations for specific facilities will be conducted consistent with the 1991
conformity guidelines. However, SCAG will reevaluate these guidelines in light of the final
regulations to be adopted by EPA regarding conformity, and the changes to the State Implementation
Plan that must follow. TLe 1991 guidelines will, in cooperation with wastewater treatment agencies,
be revised accordingly.
6. Eligible projects under state and federal water quality infrastructure funding programs should
include a range of projects, including non-point source and water reclamation projects.
- - -- _ 1001 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Pla.
Chapter Eleven • Water Quality
Discussion: Current state and federal funding (as well as future funding under a reauthorized Clean
Water Act) must recognize the unique water quality problems of different regions and provide
flexibility in financing different types of water quality projects.
I. INTEGRATION OF WATER QUALITY AND OTHER REGIONAL
ISSUES
Water quality is related to several of the other issues in the RCP. The most direct relationship is with water
supply. Poor water quality in the region—in particular, poor groundwater quality — is and will continue to
have significant implications for the supply of water for drinking and commercial purposes in the region. In
addition, water quality in other regions of the state is interconnected with the supply of imported water into
this region. Other interrelationships between water quality and other chapters of the plan include:
• Economic Development and Water Quality. Maintaining water quality is important to the economic
viability of the region. However, there are increasing regulatory and liability costs associated with
maintaining water quality and these costs can have adverse effects on operating expenses of regional
businesses. Businesses are also subject to regulatory costs to meet NPDES permit requirements or
pretreatment standards. In some areas, these costs may be increasing due to the poor quality of the
imported water supply. This chapter emphasizes the need to streamline water quality regulation and to
explore market-based regulatory alternatives when possible. Liability costs are primarily associated with
the clean-up of contaminated groundwater in the San Gabriel Valley, San Fernando Valley, and other
areas. This chapter recognizes the need to address these groundwater concerns while not driving
companies out of business.
• Growth Management and Water Quality. The projected population growth in this plan will have
significant implications for maintaining water quality, by increasing the demand for wastewater treatment
and by increasing the urbanized surface area and, therefore, the amount of urban runoff.
• Air Quality and Water Quality. The impact of poor air quality on water quality is an important, but
poorly understood, issue. Some research indicates that air contaminants can substantially contribute to
poor water quality in the region through a process known as 'aerial fallout.' Thus, efforts at improving
air quality as described in the air quality chapter, may also have benefits for water quality.
• Solid and Hazardous Waste and Water Quality. Primary objectives for solid and bazardous waste
management are to reduce and recycle wastes and to provide environmentally safe disposal options.
These objectives contribute directly to improved water quality by protecting groundwater and surface
water from contamination.
An additional important relationship is the need for adequate flood control in the region and the impact of
flood control projects on nonpoint source runoff. Traditionally, flood control projects have increased the
amount of urban runoff by directly channeling stormwater through a system of storm drains, concrete
channels, and channelized rivers to the ocean. Thus, the need to maintain adequate flood control is often in
conflict with efforts to reduce urban runoff. More information is needed on the costs and safety implications
of alternative flood control systems in the region.
SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 0 Page 11-21
ie COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
�Nf' of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
1
199M Ews AVENUE
a O.SOX 9121
FOUNEAIN VAL Y,CALIFORNIA 92129R121
Otn962-2An
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
MARCH 9, 1994 - 7:30 P.M.
9 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 210N94 PAGE 01
D REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02N9194 POSTING DATE 02M9/94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
135546 AG TECH COMPANY $50,382.14 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
136547 AMERICAN TELEPHONE&TELEGRAPH $989.19 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
135540 ABLE INDUSTRIES $954.20 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SUPPLIES
135549 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP. $9,29800 ENGINE TESTING J-19
135550 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $53.364.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9.89
135551 ALPHAGAZ $1.482.38 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135552 STN-CLOUMBUS $12.99 SUBSCRIPTION
135553 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $270.83 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
135554 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $275.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
➢ 135555 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $7,129,82 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
T 135558 ASSOC.ADMINIS.&CONSULTANTS $500.00 DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS
= 135557 AMSA $12,803,00 MEMBERSHIP DUES M.O.1-12-94
C7 135558 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $1,613,62 PAYROLL SERVICES
➢ 135569 AWARDS&TROPHIES $24.46 PLAQUES
13556D SAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $9,853.31 LAB SUPPLIES
135561 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $430.05 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
rTl 135562 BELL SECURITY $671.00 SECURITY SERVICES
3 135563 WT BILLARD $35.62 BUILDING REPAIRS
Tt 135564 BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS,INC. $57.38 LAB SUPPLIES
00 135565 BID VENTURES,INC. $162.00 LAB SUPPLIES
I 135566 BLACK&VEATCH $31.504.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146
135567 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $519.27 LAB SUPPLIES
n 135568 BROWN&CALDWELL CONSULTANTS $16,920.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 93-101
r 135569 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES
135570 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $17.152.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.8-10-92
135571 CH2M HILL $8.410.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
N 135572 CRC PRESS,INC. $42.50 LAB SUPPLIES
z 135573 CRTC-CWPCA,INC. $315.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
135574 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $19.049.54 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38,PI-34
t-T 135575 FIBERGRATEICHEMWEST $3,146.30 PUMP PARTS
135576 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $30.97 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135577 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $786.69 LAB SUPPLIES
135578 COMPUSA,INC. 54,314.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135579 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $187.57 TRUCK PARTS
135580 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1.636.75 ELECTRIC PARTS
135581 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS $49.84 PRINTING SERVICES
135582 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $194.93 TOOLS
135583 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $2,230.43 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91
135584 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $10,823.00 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
135585 DAPPERTIRE 5413.76 TIRES
135586 PETER C.DAVID CO. $27.620.10 CONSTRUCTION 7-20
135587 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $4.788.57 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-11.93
135508 DIFILIPPOASSOCINTES $122.84 PRINTING
135589 DANNY L.DILLON $10,000.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
135590 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $820.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
135591 DUNKEL BROS MACH.MOVING $641.25 EQUIPMENT MOVING
.FUND NO 9799 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/DL PAGE 02
3? REPORT NUMBER AP43
N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02M9/94 POSTING DATE 02A19/94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135592 EASTMAN,INC. $5,3B0.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES
135593 EDWARDS DIV.OF OS BLDG SYS. $833.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135594 EMERGENCY LIFELINE INC. $1,356.03 EMERGENCY SUPPLIES
135595 ENCHANTER,INC. $5,040,00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6A0-92
135598 ENTECH LAB AUTOMATION $223,25 LAB EQUIPMENT
135597 ESSENCE GROUP $480,94 COMPUTER PARTS
135598 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $339.40 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
135599 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $747.79 AIR FREIGHT
135600 FERRELLGAS $68.10 PROPANE
135601 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1,020.18 FILTERS
m 135602 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $216.45 LAB SUPPLIES
O 135603 FOOTHILL PROJECT MANAGEMENT $1,669.00 RESIDENT NOTIFICATION SERVICES
n 135604 CLIFFORD A FORKERT 58,440.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES
135605 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $150.38 PHOTO SUPPLIES
135605 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $12,066.98 WATER USE
m 135607 CRY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $2.150.00 APPLICATION FEE
3 135608 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $257.25 PERMIT FEE
# 135609 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $346.10 PAINT SUPPLIES
O0 135610 THE FOXBORO CO. $313.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135811 FREEDOM IMAGING 560.86 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135612 FREEMEN ALTERNATIVE RESOURCES $4,756.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
y 135613 CITY OF FULLERTON $99.45 WATER USE
r 135614 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3.708.76 CHEMICALS
135615 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION $50,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-15A
�y 135616 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4.422.27 TELEPHONE SERVICES
135617 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $630.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
N 135618 GRASBY S.T.I. $1,437.27 CENTRAL GENERATION PARTS
135619 DGA CONSULTANTS 52,860.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6.10-92
('l 135620 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $240.00 TRUCK PARTS
135621 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. 5432A7 MECHANICAL PARTS
N 135622 HEATHER NICKERSON $1,211.86 VEHICLE DAMAGE
135623 HOLMES 8 NARVER,INC. $43,975.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES P7d4
135624 HOME DEPOT $229.80 HARDWARE
135625 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN $68.91 BICYCLE PARTS
135626 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL - $77.819.65 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92
135627 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $460.91 CONNECTORS
135628 INTERNED $161.08 LAB SUPPLIES
135629 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $852.67 BATTERIES
135630 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $132.36 WATER USE
135631 JAYS CATERING $374.98 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
135632 JENSEN TOOLS,INC. $134.05 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
135633 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $934.95 ELECTRIC PARTS
135634 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY $1.790.81 MACHINE SUPPLIES
135635 THE KEITH COMPANIES $5,423.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-36R
135636 KING BEARING,INC. $1,459.37 MACHINE SUPPLIES
135637 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $500.23 TOOLS
D
I
N
51
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/94 PAGE 03 '
D REPORT NUMBER AP43
1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
W CLAIMS PAID 02/09/94 POSTING DATE 02/09/94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135638 LEOI-TECH $32000 COMPUTER SERVICES
135639 LEE B NO CONSULTING ENGR. $43.561.03 ENGINEERING SERVICES PIAO-182
135640 LORAIN PRODUCTS E1,251.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135641 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $970.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92
135642 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY E477.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135643 MPS E117.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
135644 MACOMCO $412.86 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135645 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $373.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
n 136646 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $80762 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
135647 RS MEANS CO.,INC. $90.42 PUBLICATION
m 135648 MERIDIAN DIAGNOSTICS,INC. E298.75 LAB SUPPLIES
Z 135649 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS $75,332.88 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENTS
17 n 135650 MIDWAY MFG,B MACHINING E3,815.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
AB
135652 MISSION I A WESTERN VISUAL PRES. ,30 .24 UNIFORM RENTALS
135852 MISSION INDUSTRIES E3,308.24 UNIFORM REN7ALS
m 135653 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $1.020.00 LAB SERVICES
3 135654 MONTROY SUPPLY CO. $49.82 SIGNS
TL 135655 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. E970.07 PUMP PARTS
00 135656 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
1 135657 WEAL SUPPLY CO. $1.931.91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135658 NEW AGE WATER TECHNOLOGY $9.02 VALVES
n 135659 NEW ENGIAND SIOLABS,INC. $356.40 LAB SUPPLIES
r 135660 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $4.79 WATER USE
135661 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $251.23 TRUCK PARTS
cy 135662 ORANGE COURIER $267.00 COURIER SERVICES
y 136663 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $1.252.11 FITTINGS
135664 ORRICK HERRINGTON B SUTCLIFFE E30,000.00 SPECIAL COUNCIL-TAXABLE COMMER.PAPER M.0.11.10.93
.� 135665 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,940.98 SPECIALTY GASES
135666 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $10,989.05 REIMBURSE WORKER5 COMP.INSURANCE
n 135667 PSI $385.50 STEAM CLEANING SERVICES
(n 135668 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) E40.84 OPERATING SUPPLIES
135669 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $8.624.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135670 PACIFIC PARTS E452.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135671 PACIFIC PNEUMATICS,INC. $47.52 FILTER
135672 PACIFIC PUBLISHERS E124.84 PUBLICATION
135573 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $214.65 SAFETY SUPPLIES
135674 PACIFIC BELL $691.63 TELEPHONE SERVICES
135675 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $159.65 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
135676 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY E939A0 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
135677 PALMIERI.TYLER.WIENER, $1,338.90 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91
135678 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES
135679 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $179.69 LAB SUPPLIES
135580 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $48,066.57 CHEMICALS
135681 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $141,796.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5.8.91
135682 PUTNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP. $103.18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE
135683 POLYPURE.INC. $16.818.37 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
D
FV14D NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2103194 PAGE 04
D REPORT NUMBER AP43
I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
r CLAIMS PAID 02/09/94 POSTING DATE 02/09M4
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135684 POWER DESIGN $6,107.32 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
135685 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $598.43 SOIL TESTING
135686 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. 65,04BAD CONSULTING SERVICES-FINANCIAL
135687 QUEST MEDIA 8 SUPPLIES $1.29724 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135658 OUESTRON CORP. $2,470.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135689 RMB ENGINEERING/MILLTRONICS $4,663.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135890 R M CONTROLS $421.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135691 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $6,093.19 ELECTRIC MOTORS
D 135692 R.S.CABINET CO. $323.25 PLAN HOLD CABINET
G� 135693 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $1,130.43 LAB SUPPLIES
m 135594 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $2.624.06 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
z 135695 ROBBINS SCIENTIFIC $301.76 LAB SUPPLIES
C 135696 ROSEMOUNT,INC. $62.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS
D 135697 RYAN-HERCO 6463.0E METAL
135698 SB J CHEVROLET 6490.12 TRUCK REPAIRS
m 135699 SKC WEST $040.60 SAFETY SUPPLIES
3 135700 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 61,742.2E PLUMBING SUPPLIES
4t 135701 DOUGSARVIS $750.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
O0 135702 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $156,932.28 CONSTRUCTION 5-36
135703 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $683.56 SPECIALTY GASES
1 135704 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $251.65 WATER USE
D 135705 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.217.92 TOOLS
r 13570E SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. 6436.48 TRUCK PARTS
r 135707 SHURELUCK SALES $2,878.65 TOOLSAIARDWARE
cy 135708 SIDU MFG CO. $3,294.29 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135709 SIGNAL FLASH CO. $460.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
135710 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC 61,085.50 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
135711 SMITH-EMERY CO. $60.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91
135712 SMITH PIPE 8 SUPPLY $56.57 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135713 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $259.24 TOOLS
(n 135714 SOFFA ELECTRIC,INC. $92.424.15 CONSTRUCTION J-20
135715 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $16,895.81 POWER
135716 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $9.895.79 NATURAL GAS
135717 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $7,232.10 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL
135718 SOUTH PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL 62,941.5E CHEMICALS
136719 SOUTH SHORE WINDOW MAINT. $2,083.34 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
135720 SOUVENIR PHOTO $829.15 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
135721 STAMEN L SPASSOFF P.E. 63,080.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2
135722 WESTALLOY,INC. $478.73 WELDING SUPPLIES
135723 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $657.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135724 STANDARD REGISTER CO. $635.84 LAB SUPPLIES
135725 STATE STREET BANK $5.847.71 TRUSTEE SERVICES
135726 GARY G.STREED $7.882.72 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL
135727 SUMMIT STEEL 64,056.03 METAL
135726 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $10.74 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
135729 SUPER CHEM CORP. $810.87 CHEMICALS
I
r
FyNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03194 PAGE05
n1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY REPORT NUMBER AP43
ut CLAIMS PAID02109/94 POSTING DATE 02/09M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135130 TCH ASSOCIATES E1.27940 LAB SUPPLIES
135731 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY E7.606.04 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
135732 TEKDRAULICS $7,005.66 MECHANICAL PARTS
135733 TEKTRONIX,INC. $3.191.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135734 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS E1,530.29 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
135735 THOMAS BROS MAPS $197.95 PRINTING
135736 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,004.89 MECHANICAL PARTS
135737 TIS TROPICAL FISH E118.53 LAB SUPPLIES
n 135730 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $169.91 LOCKS&KEYS
m 135739 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $1271.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
m 135740 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $1,095.55 TRUCK PARTS
z 135741 TRUCO.INC. $94,82 LAB SUPPLIES
C
n 134712 TRUESDAIL LABS E2,28t18 LAB SERVICES
135743 TWINING LABORATORIES $5.479.44 LIB SERVICES
-1 135744 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS E162.86 TRUCK PARTS
m 135745 UHLER,INC. $166.163.40 CONSTRUCTION 5-32 85-33
3 135746 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $375.05 PARCEL SERVICES
135747 UNITED STATES BIOCHEMICAL $214.47 LAB SUPPLIES
00 135748 UPCHURCH SCIENTIFIC E418.50 LAB SUPPLIES
I 135749 VWR SCIENTIFIC E4.746.71 LAB SUPPLIES
135750 VALIN CORPORATION Et00.90 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
n 135751 VALLEY CRIES SUPPLY CO. $644.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
r 135752 VERTEX SYSTEMS $1,631.95 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
r
135753 WEST COASTINSTRUMENTSEMICA E071.61 GAUGE
t7 135750 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY E2d,077.81 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.&12-92
y 135755 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $157.10 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
--4 135756 WHATMAN LAB SALES,INC. $995.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135757 WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT INST. $212.50 PUBLICATION
('t 135758 JOHN WILEY&SONS,INC. $371.00 PUBLICATION
-1 136759 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $22,376.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92
135760 XEROX CORP. $176.18 COPIER LEASES
135761 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $947.98 VALVES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 02/09/94 $1,572.880.63
ri
lJT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/94 PAGE O6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID b2109M POSTING DATE 02M9194
T
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 OPER FUND $8,237.94
02 OPER FUND 24,875.25
03 OPER FUND 41,139.09
03 CAP FAC FUND 5.423.29
#5 OPER FUND 4,142.90
y 05 CAP FAC FUND 324,72426
Cl #6 OPER FUND 4,86424
fn #7 OPER FUND 7,30505
z #7 CAP FAC FUND 37,349.38
CJ
� 011 OPER FUND 7,386.64
011 CAP FAC FUND 5,029.60
#130PER FUND 102.84
3 014 OPER FUND 73240
#14 CAP FAC FUND 2,097.42
#586 OPER FUND 3,146.30
00 #586 CAP FAC FUND 7.841.85
#687 OPER FUND 18,10
JT OPER FUND 538,036.05
r CORP 385,751.73
I— SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 12,70D.91
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL - 151,387.48
L7
ti 51,572,880.83
1
n
--I
y
A
POND NO' 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16194 PAGE 01 -
REPORT NUMBER AP43
Lb COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
H. CLAIMS PAID 2123M POSTING DATE 2/23194
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
135793 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES $809.80 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135794 AG TECH COMPANY $55.896.30 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-911
135795 AT&T $3,566.35 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
135796 AT&T $301.90 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
135797 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. 553.34 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS
135798 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $225.652.50 CONSTRUCTION P2-53.1
135799 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1,379.20 MECHANICAL PARTS
135800 AMERICAN CABLING&COMM. $50.64 CABLE
135801 AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION $59.00 LAS SUPPLIES
n 135802 AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO. $4.875.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-51
Cl 135803 AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO. $22,548.50 SEWER REPAIRS
Z 135804 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 5500.00 SEWER REPAIRS
135805 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $4.28 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
:1. 135806 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $957.90 VALVES
135807 APEX DRUM CO. $173.00 DRUM PICK-UP
135808 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,574.07 NOTICES&ADS
m 1358D9 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $5.403.04 LAB SUPPLIES
3 135010 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $710.30 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135811 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,291A0 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
Go 135812 ARMOR-VAC 5420.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
135813 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $1,411.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
135814 ASSOC.ADMINIS.&CONSULTANTS $7.855.72 SFI INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS
n 135815 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
r 135816 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $5,394.89 PAYROLL SERVICES
135817 THEAVEBURYGROUP $5,995.68 MECHANICAL PARTS
CJl 135610 AWARDS&TROPHIES $434.66 PLAQUES
135019 BAILEY CONTROLS COMPANY $1.086.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
N-I 135820 BANANA BLUEPRINT $7.077.42 PRINTING M.O.10.10-90
135021 BANK OF THE WEST $2,982.04 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 3-23-2
135822 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $920.05 BATTERIES
--1-1 135823 SAUER COMPRESSOR $957.74 COMPRESSOR PARTS
N 135824 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3.516.34 LAB SUPPLIES
135825 DON C.BEATTIE P.E. $2,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
135820 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $658.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135827 BELL SECURITY $1.868.13 SECURITY SERVICES
135828 SIOMERIEUX VITEK,INC. $4,750.57 LAB SUPPLIES
135829 BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS,INC. $110.43 LAB SUPPLIES
135830 BLACK&VEATCH $25,807.11 ENGINEERING SERVICES PIA6
135831 BOERINGER MANNHEIM $350.63 LAS SUPPLIES
135832 BON-A-RUES $378.85 TRUCK PARTS
135833 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $38,927.52 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18,7-19
135834 BRADY USA,INC. $86.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135835 13RITHINEE ELECTRIC $228.73 ELECTRIC PARTS
135830 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $110.46 PUBLICATION
135037 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,768.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92
135838 BUY-CHEM DISTRIBUTORS 5285.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
DJ
FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16194 PAGE 02
REPORT NUMBER AP43
tv COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
N CLAIMS PAID 2/23/94 POSTING DATE 2R3194
WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135839 CEPA $250.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135840 CS COMPANY $2,408.10 VALVES
135841 CALTROL,INC. $1.934.82 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135842 CARLETON ENGINEERS $4,154.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY
135543 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $69.495.57 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33,J-34
135944 CENTURY SAFETY INST.8 SUPPLY $15.788.40 SAFETY SUPPLIES
135545 CERFNET $17.10 COMPUTER SERVICES
135846 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING $4.810.23 PUMP
135847 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $67.51 LAB SUPPLIES
135848 COUCH 8 SONS $575,489.70 CONSTRUCTION S-37-4
'n 135849 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,386.23 PUMP PARTS
m 135050 COMPUTER DATACOM $147.49 COMPUTER HARDWARE
Z
O 135851 COMPUSA,INC. E4,870.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
n 135852 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $155.99 TRUCK PARTS
135853 CONNER PERIPHERALS,INC. $510.60 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS
—1 135654 CONSOLWATED ELECTRICAL DIST $11.082.07 ELECTRIC PARTS
m 135655 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $630.00 TOOLS
3 135855 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $10.300.41 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.7-17-91
135857 COOPER INDUSTRIES.INC. $2,440.31 CENTRAL GEN.ENGINE PARTS
00 135858 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $1.223.27 TRUCK PARTS
I 135859 COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT $21,150.00 CONNECTION FEE REFUND
n 135860 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 3214.45 ELECTRIC PARTS
135861 DAILY PILOT $66.00 NOTICES 8 ADS
135862 DARTEK COMPUTER SUPPLY $122.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES
CJ 135883 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $3,100.95 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.5-11-93
135864 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $753.71 PRINTING
N 135865 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $4.985.31 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
135856 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $1.397.39 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL M.O.1-13.92
135867 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. F8,242.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE S REPAIRS
c� 135868 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $76,562.53 CONSTRUCTION PId6-1
135869 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $5.400.00 MEDICAL INSURANCE CONSULTANT
N 135870 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $2.M.86 PAINT SUPPLIES
135871 ESP NORTH $127.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
13SS72 EASTMAN.INC. $6.466.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES
135873 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. 811.95 LAB SUPPLIES
135874 ENCHANTER.INC. $3,360.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6.10-92
135875 MARSHALL FAIRRES $78.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
135876 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $357.50 AIR FREIGHT
135877 FERRELLGAS $120.49 PROPANE
135870 CHEMWEST.INC. $2,120.00 FIBERGLASS
135879 FISCHERB PORTER CO. $1.367.14 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
135880 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $144.81 LAB SUPPLIES
135981 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $37.47 LAB SUPPLIES
135882 CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $15.606.25 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6.10.92
135883 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $228.47 PHOTO SUPPLIES
135884 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $9.061.94 BUILDING PERMIT FEES J-23-1
Lb
FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2116194 PAGE 03
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
liJ CLAIMS PAID 2123M4 POSTING DATE 221194
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135885 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $2.11 PAINT SUPPLIES
135BBS FREY ENVIRONMENTAL.INC. $565.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
135887 FURON DEKORON $95.00 CABLE
135888 EST,INC. $1.210.85 COMPUTER PARTS
135889 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $747.33 LUMBERIHARDWARE
135890 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY E1,656.12 CHEMICALS
135891 GEAR TECH S4,000.00 MACHINE INSPECTION
135892 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $335.14 ELECTRIC PARTS
Y 135893 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4.273.95 TELEPHONE SERVICES
Gl 135894 GEORGE LEECH 9 ASSOCIATES $75.23 FLOWMETERS
M 135895 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $8.741.68 MECHANICAL PARTS
Z 135896 VWY GRAINGER.INC. S354.82 ELECTRIC PARTS
d
n 135897 GRASEBYANDERSON $4.283.01 LAB SUPPLIES
17589E GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING E7,355.81 PRINTING
135899 DGA CONSULTANTS $1,885.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92
M 1359DO HBO TECHNOLOGY $114.519.93 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2
3 135901 HS TYPE 9 GRAPHICS $12.93 PRINTING
1359W HACH COMPANY $191.70 CHEMICALS
O0 135903 FREDA.HARPER E1,500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
135904 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC E843.77 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135905 HATCH 9 KIRK,INC. $580.42 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
13590E HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1.925.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
r 135907 PL RAWN CO,INC. $136.39 FILTERS
f'- 1359DB HELLO $39.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES
17 135909 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083,33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
135910 HEWLETTPACKARD S400.00 OFFICE MACHINE
135911 HOERSIGER CVS CALIF..INC. $292.67 MECHANICAL PARTS
z 135912 HOMES 9 NARVER,INC. $59,040.91 ENGINEERING SERVICES P144
135913 HOME DEPOT $1,048.71 HARDWARE
135914 HOOKER'S REPAIR SERVICE E5520 LAB EQUIPMENT REPAIRS
(n 135915 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,677.17 PAINT SUPPLIES
13591E CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH E25.11B WATER USE
135917 IDEXX $403.95 LAB SUPPLIES
13591E IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $15.288.13 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.1 IAM2
135919 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS - $663.75 CONNECTORS
135920 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $573.02 BATTERIES
136921 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT E34AS WATER USE
135922 ISCO $1,942.53 LAB EQUIPMENT
135923 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1.025.82 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
135924 JAMB CONTRACTORS.INC. $67.912.65 CONSTRUCTION P2-23-5-1
135925 JIMB SUSPENSION SERVICE $75.00 TRUCK REPAIRS
13592E JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,009.26 ELECTRIC PARTS
135927 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $1.968.94 CHEMICALS
135928 THE KEITH COMPANIES $2,637.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3.36R
135929 KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP. $192.82 FREIGHT
135930 KING BEARING,INC. $3.191.91 MACHINE SUPPLIES
W
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2116194 PAGE 04
REPORT NUMBER AP43
li J COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
r CLAIMS PAID 2J23194 POSTING DATE 2/23M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135931 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $3.523.83 HARDWARE
135932 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $671.64 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
135933 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $375.52 SAFETY SUPPLIES
135934 LEWCO ELECTRIC $263.07 TRUCK PARTS
135935 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $3,030.21 DEFERRED COMP TRUSTEE
135936 K.P.LINDSTROM.INC. E7,600.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIRONMENTAL
135937 MPS 5474.04 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
136938 MACOMCO $520.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135939 MSA $700.97 INSTRUMENT PARTS
y 135940 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. E884,188.D0 CONSTRUCTION P242-2
❑l 135941 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $120.79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
Z 135942 MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS..INC. $4,136.59 METERS
Cy 135943 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES $1.848.56 ELECTRIC PARTS
135944 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $4.517.13 MECHANICAL.REPAIRS
135945 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $153.40 FITTINGS
-1 135946 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $203.14 MECHANICAL PARTS
fTl 135947 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,683.32 UNIFORM RENTALS
3 135948 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $70.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
3t 135949 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. $998.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135950 NASCO WEST,INC. $299.59 LAB SUPPLIES
I 135951 NATIONAL FILTER MEDIA CORP. E4,268.81 MECHANICAL PARTS
135952 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $2.432.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
135953 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY $218.09 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
r-- 135951 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $817.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135955 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $629.36 COMPRESSOR PARTS
O 135956 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE $142.00 PUBLICATION
135957 OLYMPUS CORP. $6,437.4D INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
-� 135958 ORACLE CORPORATION $2,100.0D TRAINING REGISTRATION
A 135959 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 5228.97 TRUCK PARTS
t1 135960 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $202.03 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135961 ORANGE COURIER $133.50 COURIER SERVICES
(n 135%2 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. SI.926.28 FITTINGS
135963 OXYGEN SERVICE 52,745.83 SPECIALTY GASES
135964 PC SYSTEMS DESIGN $138.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES
135965 P&S FILTRATION,INC. $2,903.18 MECHANICAL PARTS
135966 PACIFIC PARTS E809.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS
136967 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $6,492.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES
135966 PACIFIC BELL 5154.83 TELEPHONE SERVICES
135969 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $189.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS
135970 PADGETT-THOMPSON $395.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
135971 PAGENET 52,054.24 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
135972 PASCAL A LUDWIG ENGINEERS $13.241.70 CONSTRUCTION J-32
135973 PASCAL&LUDWIG,INC. $128,600.60 CONSTRUCTION PI-38-2
135974 PASCAL AND LUDWIG E173,150.00 CONSTRUCTION P243.1
135975 PASCAL B LUDWIG $27,810.00 CONSTRUCTION P142
135976 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $274.69 LAB SUPPLIES
to
FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL - PROCESSING DATE 2116194 PAGE 05 n
Up REPORT NUMBER AP43
I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 2123194 POSTING DATE 223194
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135977 PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS,INC. $18.129.58 CHEMICALS
135918 PICKWICK PAPER $306.02 STORAGE BOXES
135979 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS.INC. $127.937.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.548.91
135980 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $153.60 PLASTIC BOTTLES
135981 POLY ENTERPRISES.INC. SWI.70 SAFETY SUPPLIES
135982 POLYPURE,INC. E18,198.90 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3.11-92
135983 POSTAGE BY PHONE E5,000.00 POSTAGE
135984 POWER DESIGN $20.364.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135985 POWER PUMPS,INC. E196.38 PUMP PARTS
135955 POWER TRACK,INC. $159.69 PUMP PARTS
fn 135987 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $82.00 ICE
Z 135988 AQUA-CHEM,INC. $12.714.50 BOILER
C7 135989 QUEST MEDIA B SUPPLIES $957.78 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
L 135990 RUN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. $13.541.60 CAMS STAFF TRAINING M.O.8.12-92
135991 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $374.97 ELECTRIC MOTORS
'i 135992 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1.602.71 TRASH REMOVAL
m 135993 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. E2,091177 LAB SUPPLIES
3
h 135995 DR.SHIVAJVALVE
O.,INC. $1.31$1.522.60 LAB SUPPLIES
GO 135995 RED VALVE BAN IN . E1,277.56 VALVES
135998 DRESDNER BANK WEINHEIM E277.56 PUBLICATIONS
I 135997 RED WING SHOES 5207.74 SAFETY SHOES
135998 BOLT DELIVERY $35.44 FREIGHT
n 135999 THE REGISTER $1.087.09 NOTICES&ADS
f 136000 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $6.036.97 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
Cy 136001 RICH COLOR LAB $51.18 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
136002 RYAN-NERCO $1.504.33 PUMP PARTS
N 136003 JOSEPH T.RYERSON&SON,INC. E636.94 TUBING
A
136004 SKC WEST $1,334.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES
138005 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS E830.89 ELECTRIC PARTS
c-t 136006 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS E269.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
136007 DOUG SARMS E750.00 CPRIFIRST AID TRAINING
138008 SCHWING AMERICA E3,009.78 PUMP PARTS
136009 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $999.92 SPECIALTY GASES
136010 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $992.00 LAB REPAIRS
136011 LUDECA,INC. $1,140,57 MECHANICAL PARTS
136012 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $119.31 TOOLS
135013 SHURELUCK SALES $9.801.03 TOOLSHARDWARE
136014 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION $253.34 LAB SUPPLIES
136016 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $179.83 LAB SUPPLIES
136016 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1,583.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91
136017 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $92.03 TOOLS
136018 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $5.376.25 PERMIT FEES
136019 SOUTH COAST WATER $466.49 SERVICE AGREEMENT
136020 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $39,574.11 POWER
135021 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $363,457.33 NATURAL GAS
136022 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $9.388.45 DIESELIUNLEADED FUEL
lA
In
FUND,NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 211694 PAGEN
Cy REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
m CLAIMS PAID 22394 POSTING DATE 22394
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
136023 SOUVENIR PHOTO $57.81 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
136024 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2.347.46 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
136025 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $1.393.94 METER
136026 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. 58,100IX) ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2
136027 WESTALLOY,INC. $415.58 WELDING SUPPLIES
136028 SPECTRUM CHEMICAL $104.15 LAB SUPPLIES
136029 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCE SYSTEM $5.186.25 SERVICE AGREEMENT
136030 SRECO FLEXIBLE $2.319.14 TRUCK PARTS
n 136031 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS $950.00 LAB EQUIPMENT REPAIRS
m 136032 STRATAGENE $215.73 LAB SUPPLIES
z 138033 GARY G.STREED $3.955.76 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
C7 136034 SUMMIT STEEL $7,281.54 METAL
n 136035 SUNSET FORD $117.05 TRUCK PARTS
136036 SUPER CHEM CORP. $654.25 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
136037 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $155.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
:M 136038 TARRY ENGINEERING $3.840.00 PUMP PARTS
136039 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG,COMPANY $1,256.71 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
zt 136040 TERRYS CAMERA $825.87 CAMERA EQUIPMENT
136041 TEXTILE ENGINEERING ASSOC. $3,176.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
136042 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5489.44 MECHANICAL PARTS
]a 136043 TILE MATTERS $164.64 PAINT SUPPLIES
136044 TONTS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $50SA2 LOCKS&KEYS
r 136045 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $912.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
136046 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $1.235.16 INSTRUMENT PARTS
136047 TUSTIN DODGE $300.15 TRUCK PARTS
(n 136049 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $451.00 LAB SUPPLIES
136049 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $260.49 PARCEL SERVICES
136050 UNITED SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $134.82 LAB SUPPLIES
(-t 135051 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2,548.07 LAB SUPPLIES
136052 VALIN CORPORATION $525.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
(n 136053 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $711.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
136054 VARIAN ASSOCIATES.INC. 5639.27 LAB SUPPLIES
136055 WATER ENVIRONMENTAL FED. $2.271.15 PUBLICATION
136056 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $10,626.96 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.842-92
136057 WESCO $840.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS
136058 B.L.WILCOX&ASSOC. $123.38 PUMP PARTS
136059 WITEG $411.61 LAB SUPPLIES
136060 ROURKE.WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN 584,542.76 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92
136051 XEROX CORP. $2,890.94 COPIER LEASES
136062 EVERETT H.YORK CO. $1,001.32 CENTRAL GENERATION PARTS
136063 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 022394 $3,504,904.25
Co
m
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 21IW94 PAGE07
REPORT NUMBER AP43
aj COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
I CLAIMS PAID 2123194 POSTING DATE 223194
V
SUMMARY AMOUNT
02 OPER FUND $2.624.03
02 CAP FAC FUND 108.05
03 OPER FUND 14,003.79
03 CAP FAC FUND 2.675.42
A5 OPER FUND 714.54
08 CAP FAC FUND 21,475.30
n 07 OPER FUND 3,382.19
m 07 CAP FAC FUND 30,977.07
a 011 OPER FUND 0,314.35
C1 011 CAP FAC FUND 1,788.00
n 014 OPER FUND 112.00
A14 CAP FAC FUND 428.04
'4 0187 OPER FUND 320.10
m A588 OPER FUND 1,36724
3 0580 CAP FAC FUND 577.374.70
it A867 OPER FUND 2,103.18
W R814 OPER FUND 293.18
I IT OPER FUND 803,402.14
n CORP 1,846,590.50
r SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 20,813AI
I- JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 152,171.14
t:i 53,504,904.25
1n
n
co
co
LV
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
February 15, 1994 .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
1IMAA ELLIS AVENUE
MEMORANDUM Pa 9011912J
iOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFOPNIA 927EPL9127
9141 SM2411
TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
FROM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager
SUBJECT: ONE NEW SELF-PROPELLED AERIAL WORK PLATFORM
SPECIFICATION NO. E-241
Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, February 15, 1994,for the Purchase of One Self-Propelled
Aerial Work Platform, Specification No. E-241. Tabulation of bids is as follows:
DEALER TOTAL PRICE
American HI-Lift $74,785.00
City Of Industry, CA
Horizon High Reach $82,500.00
Fullerton, CA
Western Pacific Alliance Company $85,183.00
Santa Fe Springs, CA
Mac HI-Reach $88,539.00
La Mirada, CA
It Is recommended the award be made to American Hi-Lift, the lowest responsible bidder,
for their proposed amount of $74,785.00, plus sales tax. Sufficient funds have been
budgeted for this purchase.
Respectfully bm(ttetl,
Ted Hoffman
Purchasing Manager
We hereby concur with the above recommendation:
C .
ry G. St eed Edwin E. Ho es
Director of Finance Assistant Dir ctor of Maintenance
"C AGENDA ITEM N9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C"
RESOLUTION NO. 94-32
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PURCHASE CONTRACT
RE SPECIFICATION NO. P-140 CONSENTING TO ASSIGNMENT
OF SAID CONTRACT FROM PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS. INC. TO
VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS INC.
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
CONSENTING TO ASSIGNMENT OF PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR
PURCHASE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE, SPECIFICATION
NO. P-140, FROM PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS, INC. TO
VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS INC.
WHEREAS, the Districts and Peroxidation Systems, Inc. have
previously entered into a Purchase Contract for Purchase of
Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification No. P-140, dated October 1,
1993; and,
WHEREAS, effective January 31, 1994, Peroxidation Systems,
Inc. sold, assigned and transferred to Vulcan Peroxidation
Systems Inc. its assets and business, including its rights and
obligations relative to the contract for Purchase of Hydrogen
Peroxide, Specification No. P-140; and,
WHEREAS, Peroxidation Systems, Inc. and Vulcan Peroxidation
Systems Inc. have requested the Districts to approve the
assignment of the original purchase contract to Vulcan
Peroxidation Systems Inc.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Amendment No. 1 dated March 9, 1994, to
that certain Purchase Contract dated October 1, 1993, by and
"D-1" AGENDA ITEM N9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "D 1"
i
between the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and ,
Peroxidation Systems, Inc. for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide,
Specification No. P-140, authorizing and consenting to the
assignment of said Purchase Contract from Peroxidation Systems,
Inc. to Vulcan Peroxidation Systems Inc. , is hereby approved and
accepted; and,
Section 2 . That the Chairman and Secretary of District
No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to
execute said Amendment No. 1, in form approved by the General
Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 9, 1994.
RCII.On
"D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2"
Page 1 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108" ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Javaid Contractors, Inc. C. 0. No.: Three (3)
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Operations Center Expansion at Plant No 2 Job No P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No 2)
Consultant: Brown & Caldwell Engineers
Amount of this Change Order (Add)(DedueC $36.228.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract
work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or
deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - MODIFICATION OF AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM
This item is for labor and material to design and install a wet pipe automatic fire sprinkler
system for all areas of the Operations Center. This includes upsizing the piping and
appurtenances to accommodate for the expansion of the system to sprinkle the remainder of
both existing and expansion first floors which were not required per the contract drawings.
The City of Huntington Beach Fire Department required the entire building be fire sprinkled.
The contract documents only required the Training and Conference Rooms 1-19 on the first
floor expansion and the entire basement in both the expansion and existing buildings to be
fire sprinkled. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section
10-6(8)1 of the General Provisions (Reference: PC2A; Javaid PCO #25).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $32,200.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 CALENDAR DAYS
ITEM 2 - REROUTE SANITARY SEWER DRAIN
This item reroutes the sewer line shown on the contract drawings that was to go through the
Mechanical Room in the basement of the existing Operations Center. This reroute resulted in
the deletion of the requirement to demolish and replace a portion of the two-foot thick
concrete slab in the basement of the existing corridor and Mechanical Room. The sewerline
is rerouted through the Boiler and HVAC Room of the Operations Center expansion and under
the ramp area to the existing sump. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in
accordance with Section 10-6(8)1 of the General Provisions (Reference: PC7; Javaid PCO
N28).
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(2,452.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 CALENDAR DAYS
"E-1" AGENDA ITEM N9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1"
Page 2 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Javaid Contractors, Inc. C. 0. No.: Three (3)
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No 2)
Consultant: Brown & Caldwell Engineers
ITEM 3 - REPLACEMENT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE RAMP
This item involves the cost for labor and material required to replace the reinforced concrete
ramp with water stop at the west side of the existing Operations Center. Also included are
the costs for notching the existing concrete for installation of the water stop. The concrete
ramp was removed to repair a leaking pumped drainage pipe. This portion of the concrete
ramp was not shown on the contract drawings to be demolished (Reference: PC1; Javaid
PCO #26).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,480.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 CALENDAR DAYS
TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $36,228.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 10 CALENDAR DAYS
"E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2"
Page 3 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER.
Contractor: Javaid Contractors. Inc. C. 0. No.: Three (3)
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23.5-1 (Rebid No 2)
Consultant: Brown & Caldwell Engineers
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the
prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the
Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually
agreed that 10 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order,
but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages
have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this
Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: February 27, 1993
Original Contract Time: 365 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: February 27 ,1994
Time Extension this C.O.: 10 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 36 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 401 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: April 4, 1994 -
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 2,284,864.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 706.00
This Change (Add) Meduet) $ 36,228.00
Amended Contract Price $ 2,321,798.00
"E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3"
Page 4 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108" ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA S2728.8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Javaid Contractors. Inc. C. O. No.: Three (3)
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2)
Consultant: Brown & Caldwell Encineers
Board Authorization Date: March 9, 1 S94
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Submitted/b/ye Reco mended by:
x 9� �Ip- - 2- - 9- Y¢
ngineering Manager Date Co struction Manager Date
Ap�p v by: Ap Quad as to F
(�Cl�. l3k awe, a/9/r1 rec mil ,�
Director of Engineering Date General Co nsel Date
Accepted by:
JAVAID ONITRACTORS, INC.
Z
Contractor ID e
"E-4" AGENDA ITEM # 9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4"
Page 1 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Margate Construction Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion Proiect, Job No. P2-42-2
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
Amount of this Change Order (Aeld)(Deduct) $ (24,407,001
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - DELETION OF THICKENED WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE PUMPS (TWAS)
The project plans and specifications require the Contractor to remove and replace the
six existing TWAS pumps for DAF Thickeners A, B, and C and to provide two new
pumps for the new DAF Thickener D. Prior to bid time, the Districts' maintenance
staff replaced the six existing pumps with new pumps. Rather than replace the new
pumps, it is more cost effective to delete six pumps from the contract and change
the two new pumps for DAF Thickener D to a pump that is compatible with the
existing system. This change includes material and equipment net costs only as all of
the pumps will need to be removed and placed in a new location to accommodate the
new piping configuration and new DAF Thickener pressurization systems in
accordance with the contract documents. This item was negotiated on a lump sum
basis pursuant to Section 106(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference PC4-001;
PCH-P2422-001)•
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S(66,089.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2 - EXTENSION OF HIGH PRESSURE AIR PIPING
The plans call for the new high pressure air (HPA) line to be tied in with the existing
system at the east end of the Scott Tunnel. Upon field verification, it was found that
this 2-inch HPA line is actually 175 feet away at the intersection of Scott Tunnel and
the East Secondary Sludge Pump Station (R.A.S.). This change order item provides
for the installation of this pipe. This item was negotiated on a lump sum basis
pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference PCL-034).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,727.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS 7-1"
Page 2 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Margate Construction Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: March 9, 1994
Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion Project, Job No. P2-42-2
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
ITEM 3 - CHANGE SLUICE GATE FRAME MATERIAL
The project specifications call for the Contractor to provide two plastic sluice gates
with an epoxy coated carbon steel fabricated frame. During the shop drawing review
process, the Districts design staff re-evaluated the gates location and function and
recommended that the gate frames be made of stainless steel. This change order
provides for the additional shop fabrication cost of making the gate frames from
stainless steel. This item was negotiated on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section
10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference Shop Drawing No. 63(A)).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,345.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 4 - PLANT WATER PIPING REPLACEMENT
Upon investigation, it was found that the existing galvanized main header piping
system supplying plant water to the clarifiers has severely corroded and requires
replacement. The contract includes the replacement of the lateral piping of the same
system. The existing header piping supports will be substituted with new fiberglass
supports which will match the contract-specified lateral piping support system. It
was determined to be more cost effective to change the lateral piping from the
specified galvanized pipe to Schedule 80 PVC. The replacement header piping will be
galvanized steel pipe with a coal tar epoxy (corrosion preventative) coating. This
item also includes costs to identify and protect the PVC piping from ultra-violet
damage by painting the piping per Districts' standards.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $34,610.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 12 Calendar Days
TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(24,407.001
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 12 Calendar Days
"F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2"
Page 3 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. 80X 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: March 9, 1994
Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion Project. Job No. P2-42-2
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 12 days extension of time to perform the
work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by
Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: June 2, 1993
Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: June 1, 1995
Time Extension this C.O.: 12 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 12 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 742 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: June 13, 1995
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 14,496 000.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ (54,000.00)
This Change (A96) (Deduct)$ (24,407.00)
Amended Contract Price $ 14,417,593.00
"F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3"
Page 4 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Margate Construction Inc C.O. No.: Two (2)
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion Project. Job No. P2-42-2
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
Board Authorization Date: March 9, 1994
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Submitted by, p Recommended by:
Ogineering Manager Da et Construction Manager Date
Apt by: Ap oved as to Fo :
Director of Engineering Date General Counsel 'Date
Accepted by:
MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Co actor ate
"F-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-4'$
Page 1 of 10
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One (11
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Priority Projects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1
Consultant: John Carollo Encineers
Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduct) $ (48,807.001
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING 42-INCH VCP AT EFFLUENT JUNCTION BOX NO. 1
The Contractor was directed to abandon an existing 42-inch vitrified clay pipe not shown on
the Contract Drawings adjacent to Effluent Junction Box No. 1. During installation of a
excavation dewatering system to facilitate a structural addition, the Contractor drilled through
the top of the abandoned 42-inch vitrified clay pipe. Districts' staff determined that it was
necessary to fill the abandoned pipe with concrete prior to backfilling the excavation in order
to prevent adjacent natural ground from settling and infiltrating into the pipe. This item of
work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(b) of the
General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #1)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,063.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2 - RELOCATION OF EXISTING 6-INCH DIGESTER GAS PIPELINE AT PLANT WATER
PUMP STATION AND ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING 6-INCH NATURAL GAS
PIPELINE
The Contractor was directed to abandon and cap an existing 6-inch natural gas pipeline and
temporarily relocate an existing 6-inch digester gas pipeline around the perimeter of the
excavation for the new Plant Water Pump Station bypass structure. The two existing
pipelines were in conflict with the plan location of the new bypass structure and were not
shown on the Contract Drawings. The work consisted of cutting both the existing 6-inch
steel gas pipelines, where they entered and exited the excavation, installing new 6-inch
ductile iron pipe and making new connections on the digester pipeline and removing and
capping the existing natural gas pipeline. This work was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #2)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,215.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1"
Page 2 of 10
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
108" ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One III
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Priority Projects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
ITEM 3 - REROUTE OF EXISTING 10-INCH CHLORINE SOLUTION PIPELINE AT EFFLUENT
JUNCTION BOX NO. 1
The Contractor was directed to temporarily relocate an existing 10-inch chlorine solution
pipeline that interfered with construction of modifications to Effluent Junction Box No. 1.
The actual location of the chlorine solution pipeline was different than what was shown on
the Contract Drawings and it was necessary for the Contractor to temporarily reroute the
chlorine solution pipeline around the shored excavation during construction. The work
consisted of furnishing and installing an additional 8 feet of Schedule 80 10-inch PVC pipe,
2-900 and 2-450 Schedule 80 fittings and removing and reinstalling the chlorine solution
pipeline per the Contract Drawings upon backfill of the new structure. This item of work was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO #3)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,025.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 4 - ELECTRICAL PULL BOX ADDITION AT EFFLUENT JUNCTION BOX NO. 1
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a new electrical pull box adjacent to
Effluent Junction Box No. 1. Installation of new gate controls required the addition of a new
duct bank with five new conduits terminating into an existing electrical pull box. This
existing pull box was not large enough to accept the three additional 2-inch conduits and two
additional 1-inch conduits shown on the Contract Drawings. The item includes furnishing and
installing a new 24-inch x 24-inch x 10-inch electrical fiberglass pull box and providing
intertie conduits and wire between the existing pull box and new pull box. The new pull box
was not shown on the Contract Drawings This item of work was accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-602(b) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO #4)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,176.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM N9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2"
Page 3 of 10
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One If I
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Priority Projects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
ITEM 5 - REMOVE ABANDONED ELECTRICAL DUCT BANK AT NEW CHLORINE
ABSORPTION FACILITY
The Contractor was directed to remove an existing unforeseen concrete-encased electrical
duct bank that interfered with construction of the new emergency chlorine absorption facility.
The existing electrical duct bank was uncovered during excavation for the new containment
area and was not shown on the Contract Drawings. The additional work included breaking
up, removing and disposing of the concrete-encased electrical conduits. This item of work
was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the
General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #5)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $924.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 6 - ABANDON EXISTING FIBERGLASS DUCT AT FERRIC CHLORIDE FACILITY
The Contractor was directed to remove a portion of an abandoned 20-inch fiberglass air duct
that interfered with construction of the new containment area around the existing ferric
chloride facility. The existing air duct was uncovered during excavation for the new
containment wall footing and was not shown on the Contract Drawings. The additional work
included cutting out the interfering portion of the air duct and constructing two brick and
mortar bulkheads to seal the open ends. This item of work was accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-602(b) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO #6)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $297.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3"
Page 4 of 10
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Priority Proiects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
ITEM 7 - ADDITIONAL CONCRETE PAVING WITHIN NEW SOLUTION POLYMER
CONTAINMENT AREA
The Contractor was directed remove an area of existing asphalt within the new solution
polymer containment area and replace with new concrete paving. This section of asphalt
paving was shown on the Contract Drawings to be existing concrete. The intent of the
Contract Specifications was to have all new and existing concrete surfaces within the
containment areas coated to protect against chemical spills. The coating specified in the
Contract was not compatible with asphalt. The additional work consisted of removing
approximately 60 square feet of existing asphalt, grading and cleaning the edges of the
existing exposed concrete, adding waterstop around the perimeter of the removal area and
repaving with 6-inch thick reinforced concrete. This item of work was accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(8)2(b) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO #7)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,932.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 8 - DRAIN EXTENSION AND MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING
FERRIC CHLORIDE FACILITY
The Contractor was directed to add a new 6-inch drain pipe system from the existing ferric
chloride tank overflow into the new containment structure sump. The drain was added as a
continuation of an existing drain which was being covered by the new containment structure
concrete slab. This existing drain pipe was not shown on the Contract Drawings. Other
modifications required but not shown on the Contract Drawings included repair of existing
chemical damaged concrete, removal of an abandoned existing concrete ductbank,
abandonment of existing flowmeter conduits below the new concrete slab, removal of an
existing concrete step and caulking of an existing joint between the concrete tank pad and
adjacent building. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account
pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #8)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,308.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"G-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-4"
Page 5 of 10
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Enaineers C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Priority Projects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
ITEM 9 - MODIFICATION OF NEW STRUCTURE CONNECTION AT EFFLUENT JUNCTION
BOX NO. 1
The Contractor was directed to modify the structural connection between the existing
structure and new weir gate addition to Effluent Junction Box No. 1. The Contract Drawings
required no direct structural connection between the existing structure and the new structure
addition. Districts' staff and the design engineer reevaluated the design and agreed that for
added insurance reasons the integrity of the combined structure could be strengthened by
being directly tied together for relatively minor extra costs. The additional work included
drilling the existing structure walls and floor and installing double #5 reinforcing bar tie
dowels, anchored with epoxy. These dowels were then tied directly to the new structure
reinforcement prior to placement of concrete. This item of work was accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO #9)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,977.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 1 - REMOVE UNFORESEEN CONCRETE AT NEW PLANT WATER PUMP STATION
STRAINER FACILITY
The Contractor was directed remove an unforeseen concrete obstruction during excavation
for the concrete slab and footings to support the new strainer installation at the existing Plant
Water Pump Station. The obstruction interfered with construction of the new slab and
footings and was not shown on the Contract Drawings. The additional work included
breaking up, removing and disposing of the mass concrete. This item of work was
accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-602(b) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO #10)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $470.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
11G-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-5"
Page 6 of 10
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Priority Projects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No 2. Job No. P2-43-1
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
ITEM 11 - TEST PROBE PORT ADDITION AT THE OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION
FLOW METER TEST STATION
The Contractor was directed to add a port for a meter test probe at the new Ocean Outfall
Booster Station flow meter test facility. The port was requested by the Districts'
Instrumentation Department for use in testing portable flow meter probes and was not
included in the Contract. The additional work included furnishing and installing a 42-inch
diameter pipe saddle and 1 % -inch stainless steel full port ball valve. This work was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-61B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO #11)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,670.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 12 - CONTAINMENT AREA COATING ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to apply protective coating per the Contract Specifications to all
existing exposed concrete within the new polymer solution, ferric chloride and ferric chloride
containment areas. The Contract Specifications required the Contractor to coat newly
constructed exposed concrete and did not include coating of existing exposed concrete.
Staff determined that it was the intent of the Contract to coat all exposed concrete surfaces
within the containment areas, including existing concrete surfaces. The additional work
included furnishing coating materials, sandblasting and coating all existing surfaces within the
new polymer solution, ferric chloride and ferric chloride containment areas. This work was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO #14)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $14,015.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"G-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS 116-6"
Page 7 of 10
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Priority Projects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
ITEM 1 - CATWALK SUPPORT MODIFICATIONS AT THE EMULSION POLYMER
CONTAINMENT AREA
The Contractor was directed to modify the Sedimentation Basin "J" catwalk support due to a
conflict with construction of the new emulsion polymer containment wall. This conflict was
not shown on the Contract Drawings. This modification included removing the existing
catwalk support, fabricating and installing a new redesigned catwalk support. This work was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO #151
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $756.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 14 - BLEACH STORAGE TANK RESIN CHANGE
The Contractor was directed to change the fiberglass resin used to construct the new bleach
solution storage tank to Hetron 187P. The resin specified in the Contract Detailed
Specifications was not suitable for use with hydrogen peroxide. The Districts' Operations
Department required the option of using either hydrogen peroxide or bleach solution in the
future for odor control. The additional work consisted of modifying the contract-specified
bleach tank under fabrication at the subcontractor's shop using Hetron 187P resin. When the
Contractor received direction to change the type of resin, shop drawings for the original tank
had been approved and tank fabrication was partially complete. Districts' staff determined
that additional costs to the project would be reduced by modifying the partially-completed
tank rather than discarding the tank and fabricating a new tank. Costs associated with this
item included changing the type of resin to Hetron 187P and refabrication of the partially-
completed tank. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-602(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #16)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,425.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"G-7" AGENDA ITEM d9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-7"
Page 8 of 10
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Enaineers C.O. No.: One 11)
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Priority Proiects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-43-1
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
ITEM 15 - DELETION OF MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING SCRUBBER TOWERS
The Contractor was directed to delete modifications of the eight existing scrubber towers in
the north scrubber complex and four existing scrubber towers in the south scrubber complex.
The deleted work consisted of removing a section from the main body of each scrubber
tower, adding a new 10-foot diameter by 30-inch high section and securing the new section
in place with epoxy. Also deleted was the removal of a 30-inch high section from each
existing scrubber stack in order to keep the overall elevation of the scrubber stacks equal to
the original elevation. Upon verification in the field, the size of the existing scrubber towers
was found to be sufficient for installation of the new contract-specified demisting sections
without the modifications required by the Contract Drawings. This work was negotiated with
the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH
No. 2)
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($76,844.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 16 - MODIFICATIONS TO ABANDONMENT OF A & B METER
The Contractor was directed to modify the procedure shown on the Contract drawings for
removal of the existing A & B flowmeter and abandonment of the existing meter vault and
connecting diversion pipelines. Districts' and Contractor's staff determined that a cost
savings to the Districts would result from installing two brick and mortar plugs inside two
existing 36-inch RCP diversion pipelines, working from inside the existing upstream and
downstream diversion boxes. The Contract Drawings required the Contractor to locate and
excavate the two existing 36-inch RCP meter diversion pipelines outside the existing meter
vault, cut and remove sections from the existing pipes and construct two reinforced concrete
caps. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the
General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #17)
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($17,216.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: (548,807.00)
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
"G-8" AGENDA ITEM k9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-8"
Page 9 of 10
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: _March 9. 1994
Job: Priority Projects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No. 2 Job No P2-43-1
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order,
and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: May 11, 1993
Original Contract Time: 420 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: July 4, 1994
Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: No Change
Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 3,398,000.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00
This Change (A") (Deduct) $ (48,807,001
Amended Contract Price $ 3,349,193.00
"G-9" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-9"
Page 10 of 10
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One (1)
Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Priority Proiects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
Board Authorization Date: March 9, 1994
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Submitted by: Recommended by:
gineering Manager Date C nstruction Manager Date
App v /by: Appr ad as to For
Ia
Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date
Accepted by:
MLUDWIG ENGINEERS
8 94
on actor Date
"G-10" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-10"
Page 1 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Ziebarth and Alper and C. O. No.: Seven (7)
C. S. Alper Construction Co. Inc. Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Electrification of Pumo Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No P2-42-1
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduet) $1,032.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - EXTENDED OVERHEAD CHARGE
This item will resolve a dispute regarding costs incurred by the Contractor for District-
caused delays to this work, due to the rebuild of the engine generators at Plant
No. 2. The original schedule required this work to be completed soon after the start-
up of the Central Power Generation facility at Plant No. 2. The damage to and repair
of the engines required that replacement of old engines with motors be stopped,
which severely impacted the progress of the job. Other delays issued by the Districts
included a reduction from 2 to 1 in the number of Headworks pumps that could be
worked on at once. This item will provide additional days for the delay from June
12, 1992 through December 8, 1993. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
in accordance with Section 6-4 of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $20,440.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 501 Calendar Days
ITEM 2 - REPROGRAM PUMP SEQUENCING
This item involves reprogramming the pump sequencing programmable logic controller
for Pumps 5-8; adds low level cutout devices, develops additional video screens to
provide operator interface for the system, and connects flow and levels for the Plant
Water Pump Station. This item is needed to prevent cavitation which can cause
damage to the pumps or the capacity-controlling variable speed drives and was not
shown in the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in
accordance with Sections 10-6(b)(2) A and 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $9,037.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1"
Page 2 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Ziebarth and Alper and C. 0. No.: Seven (7)
C. S. Alper Construction Co.. Inc. Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Electrification of Pumo Drives at Treatment Plant No, 2. Job No. P2-42-1
Consultant: John Carollo Enoineers
ITEM 3 - REMOVAL OF EXISTING ENGINE BASES
The Contractor was directed to remove six engine foundations and finish the concrete
in the surrounding area. The foundation left after the removal of the engines was a
raised 4-inch area located in the normal operator walking level. This concrete had to
be removed and finished to provide safe areas for operators and mechanics to work.
This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6lb)(2) of the General Provisions (See FCO #7).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $23,555.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days
ITEM 4 - LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
During the final field testing of the variable frequency drives (VFDs) for the new
pumps and motors, ABB Industrial Systems experienced several problems and delays
during the final field testing of the VFDs. The problems and corrections accounted
for 26 days of delay to the completion of the job. The contract documents provide
for liquidated damages of $2,000.00 per day for delay to the contract completion per
Specification Section 50-8. Therefore, the Contractor is assessed 26 days of
liquidated damages at $2,000.00 per day for a total of $52,000.00. These delays
are not included in Items 1 through 3 above.
CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S(52,000.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $1,032.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 503 Calendar Days
"H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2"
Page 3 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Ziebarth and Alper and C. 0. No.: Seven (7)
C. S. Alper Construction Co.. Inc. Date: March 9, 1994
Job: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No P2-42-1
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 503 days extension of time to perform
the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by
Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date: March 12, 1991
Original Contract Time: 480 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date: July 3, 1992
Time Extension this C.O.: 503 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension: 525 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time: 1,005 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date: December 10, 1993
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 26 Calendar Days
Actual Final Completion Date: January 5, 1994
Original Contract Price $ 9,369,000.00
Prev. Authorized Changes $ 110.199.00
This Change (Add) (Dedaet)- $ 1 ,032.00
Amended Contract Price $_9,480,231 .00
"H-3" AGENDA ITEM #90) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3"
Page 4 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
CHANGE ORDER
Contractor: Ziebarth and Alper and C. 0. No.: Seven (7)
C. S. Alper Construction Co.. Inc. Date: March 9. 1994
Job: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No P2-42-1
Consultant: John Carollo Engineers
Board Authorization Date: March 9, 1994
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Submitted by: Recommended by:
ngineenng Manager Date Cofistruction Manager Date
AZ
by: Ap oved as to For
�s �l�1//, ,� a-7-9v
Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date
Accepted by:
ZIEBARTH AND ALPER AND
C.S. ALPER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Q-:- aQ92A a - %-9 4
Contra or I Date
"H-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-4"
RESOLUTION NO. 94-33
ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-42-1 AS COMPLETE
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPTING ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT
TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-42-1, AS
COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Ziebarth & Alper and
C.S. Alper Construction Co. , Inc. , has completed the construction
in accordance with the terms of the contract for Electrification
of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, on
January 5, 1994; and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of
Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having
been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract,
which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed;
and,
Section 3 . That Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment
Plant No. 2 , Job No. P2-42-1, is hereby accepted as completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated
March 12 , 1991; and,
Section 4 . That the Districts' Director of Engineering is
hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion
therefore; and,
"I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1"
Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with
Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper Construction Co. , Inc. , setting
forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Electrification
of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, is
hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General
Counsel; and, _
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District
No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to
execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 9, 1994.
MA3.33
"I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
°f OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270e-7018
p141 982-2e11
September 22, 1993
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 6 of
Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with Boyle
Engineering Corporation in Connection with Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and
Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13
In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the
Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the
preparation of the design, construction plans and specifications in connection with Abandonment of
Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer,
Contract No. 6-13, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultants, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $57,585.00.
Engineering Services,
direct labor at hourly rates
plus overhead at 161
not to exceed $41,441.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 600.00
Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 11,400.00
Fixed Profit 4,144.00
TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed S57 585.0
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the
services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant.
Is/James A. Wahner /s/Thomas M. Dawes
James A. Wahner Thomas M. Dawes
Chairman, District No. 6 Director of Engineering
Selection Committee Selection Committee
"J" AGENDA ITEM #9(J )(1) - DISTRICT 6 "J"
RESOLUTION NO. 94-35-6
APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR
PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR CONTRACT NO. 6-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING
CORPORATION FOR PREPARATION OF PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE
TRUNK SEWERS AND CONSTRUCTION OF WATSON
AVENUE SEWER AND CALIFORNIA STREET SEWER,
CONTRACT NO. 6-13
x+xa++xxax++x+++x+xxa++x+xxx+x++ax
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 6 of Orange County, California has heretofore
adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of
professional services; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been
negotiated with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of
plans and specifications for Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers
and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street
Sewer, Contract No. 6-13; and,
WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to
said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final
negotiated fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 6 of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
"K-1" AGENDA ITEM #90) (2) - DISTRICT 6 "K-1"
Section 1. That the proposed Professional Services
Agreement is for a project pursuant to Amendment No. 2 to the
1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan,
approved by the District's Board of Directors on February 9,
1994. The project is to be designed as per the Master Plan
amendment approval. In accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090
of the Districts' Guidelines, a Mitigated Negative Declaration
covering this project was approved by the District's Board of
Directors on February 9, 1994; and,
Section 2 . That the certain Professional Services Agreement
dated March 9, 1994, by and between County Sanitation District
No. 6 and Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of plans
and specifications for Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and
Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer,
Contract No. 6-13, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby
authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said
agreement, as follows:
Engineering Services,
(direct labor at hourly rates
plus overhead @ 161%) ,
not to exceed $41,441.00
Direct Expenses,
not to exceed 600.00
Subconsultant Fees,
not to exceed 11,400.00
Fixed Profit 4 , 144 . 00
TOTAL, not to exceed 957 . 585.00
^K-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( i )(2) - DISTRICT 6 "K-2"
Section J. That the Chairman and Secretary of District
No. 6 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said
agreement in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 9, 1994 .
RAGIAD.035
"K-3" AGENDA ITEM #9( j ) (2) - DISTRICT 6 "K-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 94-34
AWARDING JOB NOS. P1-48 . P2-47-2 .
P2-56 AND P2-53-2
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MISCELLANEOUS ARCHITECTURAL
AND TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1,
JOB NO. P1-48; MISCELLANEOUS WORK (RE FACILITY
MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 2) ,
JOB NO. P2-47-2, FLARE IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2,
JOB NO. P2-56; AND SEISMIC RETROFIT OF STRUCTURES
AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-53-2
xxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed construction contract for
Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-53-2 is for a project which is a portion of the
previously-approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal
Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be constructed as per
the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090
of the Districts' Guidelines, the Program Environmental Impact
Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Boards of
Directors on July 19, 1989; and,
Section 2 . In accordance with the Districts' Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended, the Boards of Directors, on December 8, 1993, authorized
"L-1" AGENDA ITEM #13 - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1"
filing a Notice of Exemption in connection with the proposed
project for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant
Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job P1-48; Miscellaneous Work (re
Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2) , Job
No. P2-47-2; and Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-56; and,
Section 3 . That the written recommendation this day
submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director
of Engineering that award of contract be made to Pascal & Ludwig
Engineers for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant
Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work
(re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2) ,
Job No. P2-47-2, Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, and the bid tabulation and proposal
submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed;
and,
Section 4 . That the contract for Miscellaneous
Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work (re Facility Modifications and
Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2) , Job No. P2-47-2, Flare
Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit
of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, be
awarded to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount of
$1,003 ,899.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the
prices contained therein; and,
"L-2" AGENDA ITEM #13 - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2"
Section 5. That the chairman and Secretary of District
No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter
into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work,
pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor,
in form approved by the General Counsel; and,
Section 6. That all other bids for said work are hereby
rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 9, 1994.
rcag.034
"L-3" AGENDA ITEM #13 - ALL DISTRICTS "L-3"
i
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
FEBRUARY 9, 1994
gµiITATIpA,G
J IIe' g�
pggAGE C
I'
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
e•
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
BOLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2. 3, 5. 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held an February 9, 1994, at 7:30 p.m.. in the
Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was
called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
as follows:
ACTIVE ALTERNATE
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: Y_ Fred Barrens,Chairman Gene Beyer
s JL Pat McGuigan, Chairman Pm am _ Thomas E. Lut,
j_ James M. Ferryman Nate Reade
Thomas R.Saltarelli Lines Pont...
Z Roger Stanton William G.Steiner
i
OIS1111CT M0.2: L John Collins. ChairmanTo.GschgeD Scott
Iry FiSW_ Ier, Chairman anpro tam Tom Da
ly
,I _ Fred Berens _ Gene Beyer
• _ Buck Catlin
i_ gam Done Bob e —_ Bob Sell
L Nornan Z. Eckemode Michael Maedoweter
Wiliam D. Mahoney James H.Flare
L Carney J. Nelson Glenn Parker
_ Miguel Pulido Themes E.Lunt
y_ Roger Stanton William G. Steiner
• Daniel T.Vishnu John M.Gulfimson
Z_ George L Vaud Sheldon Singer
DISTRICT NO.3: 3_ Sal A. Sapien,Chairman Wiliam C.Estrada
_L theme DVNap. Chairman pro ter Camay J.Nelson
i_ George Brown _ Gwen A. Forsythe
Buck Catlin Cba Norby
John Collins George Scott
i. James H.Flora Wiliam D.Mahoney
L Don R.Griffin Donald Bone
Wally Li. Eva G.Miner
a Thomas E.Luv Pat McGuigan
Linda MoultanY tterson Earle Bobitaille
Z Rchsre Pari Joyce C.Nicholson
y Inn Fickler Tom Daly
• Margie L. Rice James V. Evam
y_ Sheldon Singer George L. Zlaket
L Roger Stanton Wiliam G. Steiner
Charles SyWia Anthony Selvaggi
DISTRICT NO. 5: John C.Cox.Jr.,Chairman Jan Debay
Phil Sansone. Chairman pro ter Jan Deb,
William G. Steiner Roper Stamon
DISTRICT NO.6: �_ James A.Wester,Chairman Arthur Perry
&el,Hart.Charms en pro tern John C.Cos,Jr.William G. Steiner Roger Stamen
DISTRICT NO.7: L Barry Hammond,Chairman Mike Ward
James A.Webner, Chairman pro tem Mike Scheafer
Z Fred Barrens Gene Beyer
Jan Deasy Phil Sansone
Ted MDneM Miguel PWWo
i. Charles E Puckett Thomas R. Saltandli
L William G. Stainer Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 11: Grace Wdotell, Chairman Earle Robiti ille
i_ Victor Leiprig, Chedd an we tern Linda Moulton-Patterson
y_ Roper Stanton _ William G. Steiner
DISTRICT NO. 13: Z Jehn M.Gulliason,Chairman Daniel T.Welch
Z Fred Rarem. Chairman pre tem Gana Bayer
Glenn Parker _� Sunda Dunlap
Iry Fickler Tom Daly
y_ William G. Steiner _ Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.14: Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller
Leslie Pandous, Choirmsn pro tem Charles E Puckett
Fred Sellers Gene Beyer
x Barry Hammond Mike Ward
Wiliam G. Steiner Roger Stamen
-2-
02/09/94
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G.
Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary,
Scott Archibald, Carl E. Beach, Catherine Biele,
Mike Broyles, Chris Cervellone, Corinne
Clawson, Bernie DeAnda, John Finias,
Gary Hasenstab, Cindy Handy, Roy Handy, Ed
Hodges, Larry Lazorek, Curtis Mason, William
Moline, Kent C. Nelson, Karl Nordgren, Bob
Oaten, William Pierce, L. Ellen Ray, Rudy Reyes,
Mary Simpson, Jim Tintle, Jack Vincent, Mike
Wilson, Ray Young, Victor Zorzynski
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Bill
Fleming, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone
DISTRICTS 1 , 2 & 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excerpts re
Board Appointments That the minute excerpts from the following re
election of mayors, appointment of alternate
Directors and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed, as follows: ('Mayor)
City/Agency District Active Director Alternate Director
Santa Ana 1 Patricia McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz
3 Thomas E. Lutz Patricia McGuigan
Fullerton 2 & 3 A. B. "Buck" Catlin' Chris Norby
Placentia 3 Norman Z. Eckenrode• Michael Maertzweiler
Stanton 3 Sal A. Sapiens William C. Estrada
DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive. file and accept resignation
of Mayor David M. Cheverton of the That the letter from Mayor David M. Cheverton
City of La Habra and seating first and of the City of La Habra resigning from the
second alternates to the mayor Boards of Directors of District Nos. 2 and 3, be
and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the mayor be seated
as members of the Boards:
District Active Director Alternate Director
2 William D. Mahoney James H. Flora
3 James H. Flora William D. Mahoney
-3-
02/09/94
DISTRICT 1 The Joint Chairman announced that the
Election of Chairman and Chairman office of Chairman of County Sanitation
pro tern District No. 1 had been vacated by a change
in Board representation and that election of
a new Chairman would, therefore, be in order.
Director Fred Barrera was then duly nominated and elected Chairman of District
No. 1.
Joint Chairman Mahoney then reported that the election of Director Barrera as
Chairman of District No. 1 created a vacancy in the post of Chairman pro tem and
declared nominations in order to fill the vacant position.
Director Pat McGuigan was then duly nominated and elected Chairman pro tem of
District No. 1 .
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that
Adootion of resolution of Director Robert Richardson was retiring from
appreciation for retiring Director the Board. He then introduced a resolution
expressing the Boards' appreciation to
Director Richardson.
It was moved, seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-31, expressing
appreciation to retiring Director Robert Richardson for his outstanding contributions
and dedication to public service. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
Joint Chairman Mahoney added that a plaque was being prepared and would be
formally presented along with the resolution at a later date.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed newly-seated
Presentation of District pin to Director Pat McGuigan, who is representing
new Director the City of Santa Ana to the Boards. He
then presented her with a pin bearing the
Districts' new "2020 VISION" Wastewater Management Action Plan logo.
-4-
02/09/94
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman briefly reviewed the
Presentation of PRIDE Awards to Districts' PRIDE program which rewards
emolovees employees for creative suggestions with an
economic or safety benefit to the Districts.
He reported that at its last meeting, the Fiscal Policy Committee approved five
PRIDE cost-saving or safety suggestion awards to employees totaling $1,900.00.
Chairman Mahoney then asked Bob Ooten, Assistant Director Of Operations, to
come forward and assist in the presentation of the maximum award amount of
$1,500.00 to employee Victor Zorzynski. Mr. Ooten reported that Victor
Zorzynski's suggestion to avoid equipment shut down by installing a hot water
loop bypass valve, is estimated to save the Districts approximately $15,000
annually.
The Joint Chairman commended the employee for his PRIDE suggestion and
presented Mr. Zorzynski with his $1,500.00 cash award and certificate of
appreciation.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the
Report of the Joint Chairman tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as
follows:
Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, February 16th, at 5:30 p.m.
Executive Committee - Wednesday, February 23rd, at 5:30 p.m.
(Directors George L. Zlaket and George Brown were also invited to attend.)
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that there
Report of the General Manager was no new information regarding the
previously reported accident at Plant No. 2
in which two construction contractor's workers regretfully died. Investigations are
continuing into the cause of the accident at Plant No. 2 and will not be completed
for several weeks. He advised that the Directors would be updated once there is
more definitive information.
The General Manager also stated that a New Directors' Orientation and Treatment
Plant Tour would be scheduled in the near future now that the Boards'
reorganization has been completed. All Directors are invited and encouraged to
attend. He stated that information would be mailed in the next week or so.
-5-
02/09/94
ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel referred the Directors
Report of the General Counsel to a memorandum included in their folders
that evening regarding LAFCO procedures
and reorganization wherein special districts will now have two seats on the LAFCO
Commission. The purpose of the memorandum was for the Directors' information
only.
i Mr. Woodruff then briefly commented on the 1993 Amendments to the
Ralph M. Brown Act that will become effective April 1, 1994. He reported that an
opinion issued by his office as it applies to the Districts will soon be mailed to the
Directors.
He then briefly mentioned there was a supplemental agenda item for District 7
Directors regarding litigation on a sewer backup.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-6-
02/09/94
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered '
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District
claims set forth on pages "A" and "B"
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and
are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
01/12/94 01/26/94
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund . $582,329.23 $752,456.67
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 366,219.39 2,238,867.31
Joint Working Capital Fund - 263,692.16 497,711.48
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,726.28 16,196.82
DISTRICT N0. 1 - 235.72 950.64
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 7,155.19 25,816.17
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 26,235.49 23,098.18
DISTRICT N0. 5 - 5,497.65 3,272.12
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 12.73 867.90
DISTRICT N0. 7 - 98,811.11 22,948.35
DISTRICT N0. 11 - 8,995.25 11,859.79
DISTRICT N0. 13 - 0.00 34.90
DISTRICT N0. 14 - 1,433.94 788.82
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT 58,769.42 6,137.12
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,438.74 2,110.86
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 6,109.04 7,162.59
51.440.661.34 $3,610,279.72
-7-
02/09/94
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions relative to the Biofiltration
Demonstration Project
Authorizina staff to issue
Chance Order No. 1 to
Purchase Order No. 64274
issued to Calscience
Environmental Laboratories, Inc.
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order No. 1 to
Purchase Order No. 64274 issued to Calscience Environmental Laboratories,
Inc., for performing analysis of air samples and providing for additional
testing as identified by staff in the amount of $18,000, increasing the total
authorized amount from an amount not to exceed $10,000 to an amount
not to exceed $28,000.
Authorizing staff to issue
Change Order No. 1 to
Purchase Order No. 64272
issued to AtmAA. Inc.
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order No. 1 to
Purchase Order No. 64272 issued to AtmAA, Inc., for performing analysis of
air samples and providing for additional testing as identified by staff in the
amount of $41,000, increasing the total authorized amount from an amount
not to exceed $25,000 to an amount not to exceed $66,000.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Aoorovina Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
No. P1-38-2 specifications for Priority Projects Element of
Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2, authorizing an addition of $9,167.00 to the contract
with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for three items of additional work, be, and is
hereby, approved.
-8-
02/09/94
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
No P2-53-1 specifications for Seismic Retrofit at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1, authorizing a _
deduction of $30,000.00 from the contract with Amelco Construction, A Division
of Amelco Industries, for deletion of contractor's "All Risk" insurance requirement
to be covered under the Districts' master course of construction policy at a
savings, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approvina reallocation of appr ved
actions re compliance with new That reallocation of approved costs of
SCAQMD Rule 1179 re Publicly actions re compliance with new South Coast
Owned Treatment Works Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
Rule 1179 re Publicly Owned Treatment
Works, originally authorized by the Boards on February 19, 1992, be, and is hereby
approved as follows:
Orlainal Revisgul
Description Authorization Reallocation Authorization
JEIP Participation payable to
County Sanitation Districts of
Los Angeles County $280,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $360,000.00
Special Consultant work for
Districts Site Specific Work $190,000.00 < 80,000.00 > $110,000.00
Districts' In-House Force
Account Costs $200,000.00 -.0 $200.000.00
TOTALS SQ70.000.00 -L0 5670.000.00
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizina staff to issue Chance
Order No. 1 to Purchase Order That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to
No. 64943 issued to Matrix Service. issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order
Inc. re Emergency Repairs to Plant No. 64943, issued to Matrix Service, Inc.
No. 2 Low Pressure Gas Holder increasing the total authorized amount from
(Specification No. R-042) an amount not to exceed $51,082.00, plus
applicable sales tax, to an amount not to
exceed $68,532.00, plus applicable sales tax, an increase of $17,450.00, in
connection with Emergency Repairs to Plant No. 2 Low Pressure Gas Holder
(Specification No. R-042).
-9-
02/09/94
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy
and Executive Committee Committee and Executive Committee
meetings held on January 19, 1994 and
January 26, 1994, respectively, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved.
e ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizina staff to issue a purchase
order to KPMG Peat Marwick to That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to
conduct an extended review of the issue a purchase order to KPMG Peat
Districts' internal accounting controls Marwick to conduct an extended review of
the Districts' internal accounting controls in
accordance with their proposal dated November 10, 1993, for an amount not to
exceed $25,000.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Aoorovino renewal of certain
insurance coverages That renewal of certain insurance coverages
effective March 1, 1994, be, and is hereby,
approved as follows:
Annual Insurance
coverage Umite Premium Carrier
Boiler& Machinery $100.000,000 par Occurrence $84,544 American Manufacturer
a 25,000,000 Earthquake
Fidelity&Honesty $2.000,000 Fidelity. Honesty& 4 3,706 Hartford Ina. Co.
Computer Fraud
$1,000,000 Depositor Forgery 964
$4�70
Excess Workers'Comp Statutory Benefits $36,928 National Union Q
$6,000.000 Employee Liability 1,420 JPA if lees cosily
83
*Robert F. Driver Co. is in the process of finalizing a JPA for local agencies for Excess Workers'Compensation
Insurance. If this JPA is established with carriers that meet the Districts'criteria, and the total premiums or rates
are lower than those proposed by National Union, participation in the JPA is authorized.
_10_
02/09/94
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Avorovina Third Amended Joint
Powers Agreement Confirming the That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Creation of an Agency Known as the Resolution No. 94-15, approving Third
Southern California Coastal Water Amended Joint Powers Agreement
Research Project Authority Confirming the Creation of an Agency
(SCCWRPA) Known as the Southern California Coastal �
Water Research Project Authority '
(SCCWRPA), providing for continuation of SCCWRPA for three years, from
July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1997. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve the written
report of the Special Joint Works That the written report of the Special Joint
Selection Committee re Computers Works Selection Committee re Computers
meeting held on January 27, 1994, be, and
is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with Deloitte & Touche for That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Selection of a New Financial Resolution No. 94-16, approving
Information System. Specification Professional Services Agreement with
No. S-072 Deloitte & Touche for Selection of a New
Financial Information System, Specification
No. S-072, on an hourly-rate basis including labor, overhead, direct expenses
and profit, plus out-of-pocket costs, for an amount not to exceed $150,000.00
for Phase I, Detailed Needs Assessment, and Phase ll, Develop Specifications
for a Formal RFP. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Receive and file Reoort of the Special
Committee to Study Joint Chairman's
Compensation
Verbal report by Chairman
The Joint Chairman recognized Director Buck Catlin, Chairman of the
Special Committee to Study Joint Chairman's Compensation, and
requested a verbal report.
Director Catlin stated that the 13 member committee was a
well-balanced mix of both new and older Directors with good
participation. Input was also received from other Directors. The
Committee discussed four possibilities:
_11_
02/09/94
1. The current policy, which provides for each District to compensate
the Joint Chairman $100 (the maximum allowable) for presiding
over a jointly held meeting of the Joint Administrative
Organization.
2. Do not compensate the Joint Chairman any additional amount over
and above the $100 per meeting which he/she receives from the
District he/she represents.
3. Establish additional compensation for the Joint Chairman
somewhere between $100 W above) and $0 (#2 above) to be
paid by each District for presiding over a jointly held meeting.
4. Attempt to change the existing State law to provide some other
means of compensating the Joint Chairman to recognize the
additional duties of the office.
There was a strong consensus that the present policy be retained and
that the resolution elaborate on the inordinate amount of extra work that
the Joint Chairman puts in, generally in excess of 40 hours per month. It
was also felt that the Vice Joint Chairman's pay should be limited to
$100 maximum per meeting for that day when he serves in the Joint
Chairman's absence unless he must stand in for the Joint Chairman for
the entire month. He stated that the policy is fair and recommended that
the Boards approve the Committee's recommendations.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the written report of the Special Committee to Study Joint
Chairman's Compensation meeting held on January 5, 1994, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
Adopting Resolutions
Establishing Compensation and
Reimbursement Policies for
Directors. and Repealing Prior
Resolutions
DISTRICT NO. 1
It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors of District No. 1 hereby adopts Resolution
No. 94-21-1, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for
Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-152-1 . Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-12-
02/09/94
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his opposition to the motion be
made a matter of record.
DISTRICT NO, 2
It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors of District No. 2 hereby adopts Resolution
No. 94-22-2, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for
Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-153-2. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Director William Mahoney requested that his abstention from voting on
the matter be made a matter of record. Directors Roger R. Stanton and
Norman Z. Eckenrode requested that their opposition to the motion be
made a matter of record.
DISTRICT NO. 3
It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors of District No. 3 hereby adopts Resolution
No. 94-23-3, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for
Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-154-3. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Directors Roger R. Stanton, Burnie Dunlap and Margie Rice requested that
their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT NO. 5
It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors of District No. 5 hereby adopts Resolution
No. 94-24-5, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for
Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-155-5. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Director William G. Steiner requested that his opposition to the motion be
made a matter of record.
DISTRICT NO, 6
It was moved that the Board of Directors of District No. 6 adopt
Resolution No. 94-25-6, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement
Policies for Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-156-6. The
motion failed for lack of a second.
-13-
02/09/94
DISTRICT NO. 7
It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors of District No. 7 adopt Resolution
No. 94-26-7, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for
Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-157-7. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Director Puckett requested that his abstention from voting on this matter
be made a matter of record. Directors Ted Moreno and William G.
Steiner requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of
record.
DISTRICT NO. 11
It was moved that the Board of Directors of District No. 11 adopt
Resolution No. 94-27-11, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement
Policies for Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-158-11 . The
motion failed for lack of a second.
DISTRICT NO. 13
It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors of District No. 13 adopt Resolution
No. 94-28-13, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies
for Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-159-13. Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Director William G. Steiner requested that his opposition to the motion be
made a matter of record. .
DISTRICT NO. 14
It was moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors of District No. 14 adopt Resolution
No. 94-29-14, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies
for Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-160-14. Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Director William G. Steiner requested that his opposition to the motion be
made a matter of record.
-14-
02/09/94
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Central Power Generation _
System at Plant No. 1. Job That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
No. J-19-1 , as complete Resolution No. 94-17, accepting Central
Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, '
Job No. J-19-1 , as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion
and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors
General Counsel's Comments Prior to the need for a closed session as authorized
Closed Session by Government Code Section 54957.6 to
review:
1) The Board met in closed session with the Districts' designated
representatives regarding the salaries, benefits and terms of employment
of the Districts' employees and to provide instructions to said
representatives.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Convene in closed session pursuant to
Government Code Section 54957.6 The Boards convened in closed session at
8:00 p.m. pursuant to Government Code
Section 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the
Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California
Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary
in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed
Meetings.
ALL DISTRICTS At 8:31 p.m. the Boards reconvened in
Reconvene in regular session regular session.
-15-
02/09/94
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:31 p.m.
DISTRICT 2
Actions re Santa Ana River
Interceptor, Contract No. 2-31 and
Contract No. 2-14-5R2
Receive and file Project Report
prepared by Willdan Associates
re Contract No. 2-31
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Project Report prepared by Willdan Associates, dated December
1992, on the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer, Contract
No. 2-31, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Authorizing the Selection
Committee to solicit proposals
and negotiate a Professional
Services Agreement for the
preparation of a proiect report
for Contract No. 2-14-5R2
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit
proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for the
preparation of a project report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor
Manhole Erosion Protection and Access Roads, Contract No. 2-14-5R2.
-16-
02/09/94
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Aporovina Addendum No. 1 to the
Professional Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee certification
Post. Buckley. Schuh & Jernigan. Inc. of the final negotiated fee for design and
for design and construction support construction support services for
services re Contract No. 2-9-R1 Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk
Sewer, from Imperial Highway West of
Kraemer Boulevard to the Intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated
Road, Contract No. 2-9-Rt, providing for a name change to Post, Buckley,
Schuh & Jernigan, Inc., additional design services for sewer realignment in
Bastanchury Road and a reallocation of authorized funds between categories,
be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution
No. 94-18-2, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Post, Buckley,
Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for
labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit,
for an additional amount not to exceed $15,798.00, increasing the total
authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $119,524.00 to an
amount not to exceed $135,322.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:31 p.m.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Aporovina Professional Services
Agreement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee certification
Corporation for preparation of a of the final negotiated fee relative to the
oroiect report, design and Professional Services Agreement with Boyle
construction support services for Engineering Corporation for preparation of a
Contract No. 3-38 project report, design and construction
support services required for Improvements
to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Contract No. 3-38, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution
No. 94-19-3, approving said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for
said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses
and fixed profit for a total amount not to exceed $289,946.00. Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-17-
02/09/94
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:31 p.m.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Chance Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Contract That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
No. 5-36 specifications for Crystal Cove Pump
Station, Contract No. 5-36, authorizing a net
deduction of $25,893.00 from the contract with Schuler Engineering
Corporation for six items of added or deleted work, and granting a time
extension of 46 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is
hereby, approved.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:31 p.m.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
AAdiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:31 p.m.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:31 p.m.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:31 p.m.
-18-
02/09/94
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file reauest for
annexation and authorizina initiation That the petition from Sharon Coates and
of proceedings re proposed Thomas Young requesting annexation of
Annexation No. 145 - TRC .942 acres of territory to the District, in the
Annexation vicinity northwest of Overhill Drive and Deer
Haven Drive in unincorporated County
territory, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution
No. 94-20-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the
District (proposed Annexation No. 145 - TRC Annexation to District No. 7).
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item
relative to Summons and Complaint
for Damages. Margaret M. Holm vs.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County. Orange County Superior
Court. Case No. 718128
Authorizing consideration of
Supplemental Aaenda Item
relative to Summons and
Complaint for Damages.
Margaret M. Holm vs. County
Sanitation Districts of Orange
County. Orange County
Superior Court, Case
No, 718128
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of a
supplemental agenda item relative to Summons and Complaint for
Damages, Margaret M. Holm vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 718128, which was
not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request
to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted.
_19_
02/09/94
Receive and file Summons and
Complaint for Damaaes.
Margaret M. Holm vs. County
Sanitation Districts of Orange
: County. Orange County
Superior Court. Case
No, 718128
General Counsel's report
The General Counsel stated that the Summons and Complaint was in
reference to a sewer backup in the north Tustin area a few months ago.
At this particular location he reported that two prior claims had been
received by the Districts from a prior property owner. The property is
located downgrade of the street and the prior owner had been advised by
Mr. Woodruff and Districts' staff to install a backflow device within the
owner's private sewer lateral line. The owner failed to do so. Whenever
there is excess water in the sewer, it has a tendency to go down and
back up at this particular location.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Summons and Complaint for Damages, Margaret M. Holm vs.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior
Court, Case No. 718128, relative to sewer back-up damage, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby,
authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:37 p.m.
-20-
02/09/94
DISTRICT 6
Actions relative to the Mitigated
Negative Declaration re Abandonment
of Airbase Trunk Sewers and
Construction of Watson Avenue
Sewer and California Street Sewer,
Contract No. 6-13
Open Public Hearing '
The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:33 p.m.
Receive and file Staff Report
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report dated January 12, 1994 re Mitigated Negative
Declaration for Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction
of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract
No. 6-13, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed.
Receive and file written
comments
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the following written comments, be, and are hereby, received and
ordered filed:
Costa Mesa Sanitary District November 29, 1993
Mesa Consolidated Water District December 9, 1993
City of Costa Mesa December 12, 1993
City of Santa Ana December 12, 1993
Orange County EMA December 29, 1993
Close hearing
There being no further comments, the Chairman then declared the
hearing closed at 8:34 p.m.
Approving Mitigated Negative
Declaration and authorizing
filing of a Notice of
Determination re Contract
No. 6-13
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-30-6,
approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration and authorizing filing of a
Notice of Determination relative to the Abandonment of Airbase Trunk
Sewers and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street
Sewer, Contract No. 6-13. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes.
-21-
02/09/94
Aoorovino Amendment No. 2 to
the 1989 Master Plan for
Collection. Treatment and
Disposal Facilities incoroorating
Abandonment of Airbase Trunk
Sewers North of Baker Street
and Construction of Watson
Avenue Sewer and California
Street Sewer. Contract
No. 6-13
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Amendment No. 2 to the 1989 Master Plan for Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities incorporating Abandonment of Airbase
Trunk Sewers North of Baker Street and Construction of Watson Avenue
Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13, be, and is hereby,
approved.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Journment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:35 p.m.
Assistant Secr ry of Boards of Directors
of County Sam tion 99tricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
-P4-
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 110594 PAGE 1 ,
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 111294 POSTING DATE 1112M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
134952 AG TECH COMPANY $61,505.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.0.91
134953 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $220.94 LAB SUPPLIES
134954 ALADDIN HOUSE $32.33 WINDOW BLINDS
134955 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1.435.89 MECHANICAL PARTS
134956 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $93.97 PUBLICATION
134957 AMERSKAM CORP. $678.83 LAB SUPPLIES
134958 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $140.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
134959 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $953.31 NOTICES&ADS
134960 APPLIED SIOSCIENCE $2,689.37 LAB SUPPLIES
134961 ABC LABORATORIES $2.040.00 LAB SERVICES
134962 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $83.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
134963 BRW SAFETY&SUPPLY $2,567.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES
1349M BANANA BLUEPRINT $5,806.88 PRINTING M.0.10-10-90
134965 BAUER COMPRESSOR $260.19 COMPRESSOR PARTS
TUNS BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $5,260.91 LAB SUPPLIES
I U967 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $649.81 LAB EQUIPMENT
IM968 SIOSAFETY SYSTEMS.INC. $163.35 LAB SUPPLIES
134969 BISHOP COMPANY $230.04 TOOLS
M 134970 BLACK&VEATCH $36,077.81 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146
X 134971 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4,832.59 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.0.4-14-93
.�. 134972 BON-A-RUES $453.53 TRUCK PARTS
DO 134973 BORNEMANN PUMPS.INC. S3,515.56 PUMP PARTS
134974 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $6,420.43 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7.18
134975 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $9,547.46 GENERATORS
D 134976 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $940.20 SUBSCRIPTION
134977 CHUM HILL $28.848.16 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
~ 134978 C.P.I. $488.42 LAB SUPPLIES
134979 CS COMPANY $17.238.19 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
134980 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO.,INC. $350.88 CHEMICALS
134981 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $1.200.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
134982 CALIFORNIA CIRCUITS ASSOC $260.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES
IU983 CALIFORNIA DOLLY&SUPPLY $426.72 BOXES
134984 CALIF.ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS $1.223.49 MECHANICAL PARTS
134985 CALSCIENCE ENVIRONMENTAL LABS $4.730.00 LAB SERVICES
134986 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS $90,018.63 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38,J-33
I U987 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $3.468.54 SAFETY SUPPLIES
IU988 CETAC TECHNOLOGIES.INC. $51.67 LAB SUPPLIES
134989 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $1,050.00 PUMP PARTS
134990 CITY OFFICE FURNITURE,INC. $381.30 OFFICE FURNITURE
134991 CLARK CONSULTANTS $1,105.00 ELECTRICAL CONSULTING
134992 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $45.56 SERVICE AGREEMENT
134993 COASTALMOTION $15B4.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES
134994 COCA COLA FOODS DIVISION $90,466.69 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
134995 COUCH&SONS $52.821.00 CONSTRUCTION 1-9
134996 COMPUSA,INC. 13.315.86 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
134997 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $207.98 TRUCK PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE VD5194 PAGE 02
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID V12/94 POSTING DATE 1/12,94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
134998 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2.239.29 ELECTRIC PARTS
134999 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $766.03 TOOLS
1350DO CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES $300.00 INSTRUMENT SERVICES
135001 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $5,543.54 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.7-17-91
135002 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $2.545.15 CENTRAL GEN.ENGINE PARTS
135003 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $137.80 TRUCK PARTS
135004 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $16.48 ELECTRIC PARTS
135005 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $76.66 1992-93 SALES TAX
135006 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $257.98 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEE
135007 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL $590.05 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK OVERSIGHT PROG.
135008 DAPPER TIRE $927.76 TIRES
135009 PETER C.DAVID CO. $06,232.15 CONSTRUCTION 7-20
135010 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
135011 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $3.703.28 VALVES
135012 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $4.606.98 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O B-11-93
135013 DIFILIPPOASSOCIATES $334.24 PRINTING
135014 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $758.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
135015 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $159.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES
m 135016 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $816.50 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL
X 135017 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $4.312.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE&REPAIRS
135018 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $820.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
Lb 135019 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $5.400.00 PERSONNEL INSURANCE CONSULTANT
135020 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $165.91 PAINT SUPPLIES
135021 D'VALS SALES $43.75 FITTINGS
D 135022 ESP NORTH $1.333.60 MACHINE PARTS
135023 EASTMAN.INC. $7.914.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES
N 135024 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $2,490.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135025 ELECTRO ENERGY CORP. $3,280.00 ELECTRICAL TESTING SERVICES
135026 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10.92
135D27 ENTECH LAB AUTOMATION $379.23 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135028 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $851.20 LAB SERVICES
135029 ESSENCE GROUP $1.365.49 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
135030 CHARLES EVANS B ASSOC 536,025.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-CENT GEN AGRMT.
135031 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $270.75 AIR FREIGHT
135032 FERRELLGAS $83.10 PROPANE
135033 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1,384.26 FILTERS
135034 FIRST COMPANY $256.45 JANITORVIL SUPPLIES
135035 FISCHER 8 PORTER CO. $99.95 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
135036 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $149.22 LAB SUPPLIES
135037 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $233.60 PHOTO SUPPLIES
135038 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $578.63 PAINT SUPPLIES
135039 THE FOXBORO CO. $2.728.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135040 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $263.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES
135041 FURON DEKORON $332.95 CABLE
135042 GST,INC. $8,311.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES
135043 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2,375.89 CHEMICALS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1105/94 PAGE 03
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1/12194 POSTING DATE 1112194
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135044 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $202.11 ELECTRIC PARTS
135045 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,544.38 TELEPHONE SERVICES
135046 GENE TRAK SYSTEMS $711.30 LAB SUPPLIES
135047 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $1.421.71 PUMP PARTS
135048 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $112.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES
136049 GRASBY S.T.I. $W5.22 CENTRAL GENERATION PARTS
135050 DGA CONSULTANTS $3.120.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92
135051 HACH COMPANY $2.574.04 LAB SUPPLIES
135052 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $725.52 VALVE PARTS
136053 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $825.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
135054 PL HAWN CO,INC. $4.244.46 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
135055 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
135056 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL $116.54 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
135057 HILTI,INC. $1,508.71 TOOLS
13MM HI STANDARDAUTOMOTNE $903.72 TRUCK PARTS
135059 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $497.91 COMPRESSOR PARTS
135050 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO 92,407.46 LAB SUPPLIES
fn 135061 HOGG B DAVIS,INC. $22.465.89 UTILITY TRAILERS
X 135062 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $27.585.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES PlJ
= 135063 HOME DEPOT $298.73 HARDWARE
135054 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $944A0 PAINT SUPPLIES
13SMS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $18,195.00 WATER USE
135066 HUNTS FINAL PHASE $990.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
n 135067 IRD MECHANALYSIS $780.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS
I 135068 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $29,835.29 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11.18.92
W 135009 INDUSTRIAL BANK OF JAPAN $1.31ll.22 COP LETTER OF CREDIT
135070 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFG. $2.632.74 FILTER
135071 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $3,400.00 PUMP
135072 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $651.62 CONNECTORS
135073 INVITROGEN $149.69 LAB SUPPLIES
135074 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $4.90 WATER USE
135075 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $705.27 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
135076 JAYS CATERING $110.39 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
135077 JENSEN TOOLS,INC. $134.06 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
135078 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $25,00 TRUCK REPAIRS
135079 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $167.50 ELECTRIC PARTS
135080 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $1,989,32 CHEMICALS
135081 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY $91.94 MACHINE SUPPLIES
135082 THE KEITH COMPANIES $315,00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-36R
135053 KELLY PAPER $4121 PRINTING
135084 KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP. $4.948.31 WORKBENCH
135085 KING BEARING,INC. $?233.02 MACHINE SUPPLIES
135086 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $4,871.79 TOOLS
136087 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $2,232.50 CONNECTION FEE REFUND
135088 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $99.24 CHEMICALS
135089 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $24.48 SAFETY SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/05/94 PAGE 04
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1/12/94 POSTING DATE 1/12/94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135090 LEGI-TECH $320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES
135091 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGR. $28.480.53 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1.40.2
135092 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $970.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92
135D93 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $490.17 LAB SUPPLIES
135094 MPS $116.14 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
135095 MACOMCO $1.022.36 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135096 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $2,404.44 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
135097 MANDIC MOTORS $35.00 TOWING SERVICES
135098 MANTEK $551.09 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES
135099 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $36.04 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135100 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $124.87 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
135101 D A MATTHEWS B ASSOC. $1,420.75 TOOLS
135102 MICROAGE OF CERRITOS $5,148.51 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135103 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $749.97 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.11-18.92
135104 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $1.280.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
135105 MIDWEST TROPHY $56.09 EPA AWARD
135106 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.452.40 UNIFORM RENTALS
136107 MOBILE HOSE AND HYDRAULIC $69.45 PUMP PARTS
m 135108 MOLECULAR PROBES,INC. $452.00 LAB SUPPLIES
Z 135109 MONTROY SUPPLY CO. $87.69 SIGNS
135110 MOTOROLA,INC. $1.232.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS
py 135111 NASCO WEST,INC. $151.55 LAB SUPPLIES
135112 NATIONAL RENT A FENCE CO. $540.20 FENCING RENTAL
135113 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
3:. /05114 RORY NELSON $13,500.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
135115 CM OF NEWPORT BEACH $15.65 WATER USE
'C 135115 CRY OF NEWPORT BEACH $1,913.11 EMERGENCY MANHOLE REPAIRS
135117 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $158.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS
13611$ OCCUPATIONAL VISION SYSTEMS $694.08 SAFETY GLASSES
135119 DX SYSTEMS CO. $5,771.23 CHLORINE M.O.11-18-92
136120 OLYMPIC CREATIONS $1.545.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES
135121 OPERATION TECHNOLOGY,INC. $3.397.68 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135122 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $288.15 TRUCK PARTS
135123 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $123.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135124 ORANGE COURIER $133.50 COURIER SERVICES
135125 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $994.69 FITTINGS
136120 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,898.41 SPECIALTY GASES
135127 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $1.500.00 DEFERRED COMP TAXES
135128 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $10,357.73 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP
135129 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $32,325.00 GAP WATER USE
135130 PGC SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION 565.52 LAB SUPPLIES
135131 PACIFIC PARTS $1.039.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135132 PACIFIC PNEUMATICS,INC. $110.98 FILTER
135133 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 528.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES
135134 PACIFIC BELL $198.73 TELEPHONE SERVICES
135135 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $7,734.00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/05194 PAGE 05 ,
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1H2F31 POSTING DATE 1112190
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135136 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $6.343.07 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
135137 PAGENET $146.36 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
135130 PALMIERI.TYLER,WIENER, $296.01 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-12-91
135139 PARAGON CABLE $35.78 CABLE SERVICES
135140 PARTS UNLIMITED $120.34 TRUCK PARTS
135141 PENHALL COMPANY 5574.00 CONCRETE REMOVAL
135142 PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS,INC. $52.037.57 CHEMICALS
135143 PETROOUIP $115.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1351" PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $173,677.08 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91
135145 POLYPURE,INC. $16,832.02 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.}11.92
135146 POSTAGE BY PHONE 55,000.00 POSTAGE
135147 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. 5770.44 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
135148 CONTROL CONCEPTS $34124 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
135149 PREMIER STEEL $377.13 METAL
135150 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $105.00 ICE
135151 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $555.17 SOIL TESTING
135152 PUMP ENGINEERING $505.12 PUMP PARTS
fT 136153 OUESTRON CORP. 5446.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135154 RJE INTERNATIONAL $255.00 LAB REPAIRS
Z 135155 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $946.99 ELECTRIC PARTS
135156 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1.682.71 TRASH REMOVAL
135157 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $4.367.51 LAB SUPPLIES
-1 135158 DR.SHIVAJI RAMALINGAM $324.50 LAB SUPPLIES
n 135159 RED WING SHOES $238.78 SAFETY SHOES
I 135160 THE REGISTER $1.457.59 NOTICES 8 ADS
Vl 135161 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1,110.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135162 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT.CORP. $1.170.21 LAB SUPPLIES
135163 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $170.09 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135164 SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS $17.073.65 LAB SUPPLIES
135165 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $196.09 SPECIALTY GASES
135156 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS.INC. $139.00 LAB REPAIRS
135157 SENSUS TECHNOLOGIES 5577.01 METER
135168 SEVEN-UP BOTTLING CO. $36.479.18 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
135159 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $4.623.50 TOOLS
135170 SHURELUCK SALES 57,695.15 T0OLS01ARDWARE
135171 SMITH-EMERY CO. 5678.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91
135172 SMITH PIPE 8 SUPPLY $242.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135173 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $702.21 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135174 SOFFA ELECTRIC,INC. $1.275.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135175 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $175.00 PERMIT FEES
135176 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. $79.727.40 POWER
135177 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $146.00 POWER METER
135178 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $22,822.72 NATURAL GAS
135179 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $16.276.00 DIESEWNLEADED FUEL
135180 SOUTH SHORE WINDOW MAINT. $2.003.34 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
135161 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $13.50 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE U05194 PAGE O6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1112194 POSTING DATE V12194
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT -
135182 WESTALLOY,INC. $225.41 WELDING SUPPLIES
135183 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $2.444.41 LAB SUPPLIES
135184 SPRINGER-VERLAG $549.84 LAB SUPPLIES
135185 GARY G.STREED $5,939.96 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL
135186 SUNSETFORD $369.25 TRUCK PARTS
135187 JOHN SWINDLER $285.22 VEHICLE DAMAGE
135188 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $872.12 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
135189 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL $280.55 MACHINE REPAIRS
135190 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,073.45 MECHANICAL PARTS
135191 TODD ENTERPRISES $1,304.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES
135192 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. $980.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135193 TONY'S LOCK B SAFE SERVICE $1,171.96 LOCKS&KEYS
135194 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO. $4.555.91 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.1.1192
135195 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $46.33 TRUCK PARTS
1351% TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $666.58 TRUCK PARTS
135197 TRUESDAIL LABS $846.D0 LAB SERVICES
135198 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $573.98 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135199 TUSTIN DODGE 525.00 TRUCK PARTS
X 135200 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $353.00 LAB SUPPLIES
= 135201 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $561.0 PARCEL SERVICES
t 135202 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2,215.02 LAB SUPPLIES
135203 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $991.14 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135204 VERNE'S PLUMBING $1.746.22 PLUMBING SERVICES
n 136205 VILLAGE NURSERIES $315.00 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
1 135206 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $10,166.43 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92
135207 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $139.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
135208 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL $47.79 TRUCK PARTS
135209 CITY OF WESTMINSTER $1.603.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING
135210 WHESSOE VAREC $1.494.74 VALVES
135211 XEROX CORP. $4,741.62 COPIER LEASES
135212 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $568.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 01112(94 $1,440,661.34
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATEIlM4 PAGE 07
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 11112194 POSTING DATE 1112/94
SUMMARY AMOUNT
01 OPER FUND $235.72
02 OPER FUND 4,78847
92 CAP PAC FUND 2,386.78
#3 OPER FUND 25,907.71
#3 CAP FAC FUND 327.78
05 OPER FUND 4,746.48
05 CAP FAC FUND 751.17
#6 OPER FUND 12.73
#7 OPER FUND 4,156.53
07 CAP FAC FUND 94,652.58
#11 OPER FUND 7.095.25
#11 CAP FAC FUND 1,900.00
#14 CAP FAC FUND 1,433.94
#588 OPER FUND 903.33
05&6 CAP FAC FUND 57.866.09
rn #687 OPER FUND 2,438.74
X #7814OPERFUND 6,109.04
2
n-i JT OPER FUND 366.219.23
39
CORF 312,720.28
r--i SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 12,728.28
n JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 263.892.18
V $1,440,881.34
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/1Sf94 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1/26/94 POSTING DATE 1126194
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
135246 AG TECH COMPANY $55.005.45 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9.91
135247 AT&T $2.344.90 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
135248 AT&T $211.19 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
135249 AT&T $2.20 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
136250 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $323.25 LAB SUPPLIES
135251 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $35,576.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89
135252 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $222.705.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-52-1
135253 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY 5132.16 PUBLICATION
135254 AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO. $22.410.67 CONSTRUCTION P2-51
135255 AMICON,INC. $1,509.35 LAB SUPPLIES
135256 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $408.69 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
135257 ABC LABORATORIES $235.00 LAB SERVICES
135258 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $2,518.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135259 ARMOR-VAC $624.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
135280 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $282.20 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
135251 ART WORKS $169.22 AWARDS FRAMING
135262 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $133.61 BUILDING MATERIALS
136263 AMSA $1.185.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
m 135264 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $642.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT
X 135265 AURORAPUMP $859.81 PUMP PARTS
2
135267 BRWAUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $5,204.85 SAFETY
SERVICES
135260 BRW SAFETY&SUPPLY $1 526.90 SAFETY SUPPLIES
135259 BATTERY SPECIALEYCO.. ,297.82 PUBLICATION
b0 135270 BATTERY COMPRESSOR
$3,297.82 BATTERIES
135270 BAUER COMPRESSOR $2,528.20 COMPRESSOR PARTS
H 135271 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $6.211.19 LAB SUPPLIES
135272 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS 545,874.51 LAB EQUIPMENT
135273 WT BILLARD $250.04 BUILDING REPAIRS
135274 BIOMERIEUX VITEK,INC. $992.85 LAB SUPPLIES
135275 BIOTECH NET,INC. $56.12 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135276 BLACK&VEATCH $4,161.86 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-25-1
135277 BOERINGER MANNHEIM $1.214.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135278 BONA-RUES $453.10 TRUCK PARTS
135279 BOOT BARN 5450.68 SAFETY SHOES
135280 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $1.665.93 ELECTRIC PARTS
135251 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $304.93 INSTRUMENT
1352B2 BUDGET JANITORIAL $5,271.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES
135283 BNI BOOKS $353.24 BOOKS
135284 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $1,024.09 SUBSCRIPTION
135285 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $340.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
135286 BUSINESS NEWS PUBLISHING $62.00 SUBSCRIPTION
135287 CH2M HILL $1,119.22 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31
135208 C.P.I. $1,074.27 LAB SUPPLIES
135289 CRC PRESS,INC. $637AS LAB SUPPLIES
135290 CRM FILMS $1,454.88 LAB SUPPLIES
135291 CS COMPANY $17.023.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/19M PAGE 02
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 126194 POSTING DATE 12694
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135292 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $192.13 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135293 CALSCIENCE ENVIRONMENTAL LABS $4.650.00 LAB SERVICES
135294 CARLETON ENGINEERS $127.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY
135295 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $1,976.87 ENGINEERING SERVICES 11.17
135M CASHCO $491.60 VALVE
135297 CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL DEV. $295.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
135M CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $3,291.17 OFFICE FURNITURE
135299 CENTURY PAINT $224.62 PAINT SUPPLIES
136300 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $2,187.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES
135301 CHEM SERVICE $700.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135302 BRIAN CHUCHAUS JEEP, INC. $15.959.89 VEHICLE
135303 COAST DISTRIBUTION $1,433.90 OPERATING SUPPLIES
1353154 COLE SCIENTIFIC,INC. $195.00 LAB SERVICES
135305 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $1,051.45 LAB SUPPLIES
135308 COUCH&SONS $19.378.87 ENGINEERING SERVICES
135307 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $2.474.00 PUMP PARTS
1353D8 COMPUSA, INC. $2.236.46 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135309 COMPUSERVE $86.76 COMPUTER SERVICES
TTI 135310 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $196.27 TRUCK PARTS
X 135311 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $9,800.15 ELECTRIC PARTS
.=y 135312 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $521.79 TOOLS
CO 135313 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. 53,846.68 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91
135314 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 5565.69 PRINTING
135315 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C 5286.35 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.7-17-91
CM 135316 COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC. $3.734.08 CENTRAL GEN.PARTS
1 135317 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $170.21 TRUCK PARTS
N 135318 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $939.21 ELECTRIC PARTS
135319 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $1.848.13 HAZARDOUS WASTE TAX
135320 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $293.58 DIESEL USE TAX
135321 DAILY PILOT $115.50 NOTICES&ADS
136322 DEAVER MANUFACTURING CO. $587.54 TRUCK PARTS
135323 HSKIDECKER $293.99 INSTRUMENTPARTS
135324 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $1,253.50 FREIGHT
135325 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $4,591.19 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.B-11-93
135326 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $2.212.57 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135327 SYCON CORP. $245.22 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135328 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $5,605.0D HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSALM0.1-13-92
136329 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $113,837.28 CONSTRUCTION P146-1
135330 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $=.Do PLANT MAINTENANCE&REPAIRS
135331 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $486.81 PAINT SUPPLIES
135332 ESP NORTH 5286.32 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
135333 EASTMAN,INC. $1.756.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES
135334 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $75.64 LAB SUPPLIES
135336 ENCAD $70.04 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
135336 ENCHANTER,INC. $5,040.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6.10-92
135337 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $357.60 LAB SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1119/94 PAGE 03
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 126194 POSTING DATE 126M
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135338 JOSEPH EVANS $1,292.58 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
135339 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $714.28 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
135340 MARSHALL FAIRRES $78.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
135341 FASTFRAME OF HUN INGTON BEACH $106.11 AWARDS FRAMING
135342 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $268.50 AIR FREIGHT
135343 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $122.06 FILTERS
135344 FIRST COMPANY $256.45 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
135345 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $3,104.99 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
135346 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,08226 LAB SUPPLIES
135347 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $5,632AS LAB SUPPLIES
135348 FLOSYSTEMS $7,212.64 PUMP PARTS
135349 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA S313.65 PHOTO SUPPLIES
135350 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1,279.00 PAINT SUPPLIES -
135351 THE FOXBORO CO. $167.M INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135352 FRASE ASSOCIATES $500.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION
135353 FREEDOM IMAGING $58.87 SERVICE AGREEMENT
136354 THE FUTURE NOW $457.94 PRINTING
135355 GST,INC. $34,771.88 OFFICE EQUIPMENT -
m 135356 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $2,565.61 LUMBERIHARDWARE
X 135357 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $1.418.27 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS
135358 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4,587.41 TELEPHONE SERVICES
Ly 135359 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $23,459.56 PUMP PARTS
135360 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $30.00 PUBLICATIONS
"4 135361 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $8,274.66 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
LA 135362 GRASSY S.T.I. $1,635.88 CENTRAL GENERATION PARTS
1 135363 DGA CONSULTANTS $1,560.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92
W 135364 HCM MEDICAL REVIEW $264.84 PUBLICATION
135365 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $12.93 PRINTING
135366 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $78.62 TRUCK PARTS
135367 FREDA HARPER $1.500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
135368 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $663.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135369 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $3,234.53 TRUCK PARTS
135370 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $8.425.00 LAB EQUIPMENT
135371 PL HAWN GO,INC. S465.71 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
135372 HEWLETT PACKARD $1.348.73 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135373 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $719.61 MECHANICAL PARTS
135374 HOME DEPOT $230.00 HARDWARE
135375 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $104A7 PAINT SUPPLIES
135376 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $67,963.32 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92
135377 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $422.12 CONNECTORS
135378 INGRAM PAPER $495.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES
135379 INTELLIGENETICS $710.38 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135380 INSTITUTE FOR SCIENTIFIC INFO S2,945.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135381 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $391.93 BATTERIES
135382 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $107.76 WATER USE
135383 J&W SCIENTIFIC $818.54 LAB SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/19/94 PAGE 04
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 126M94 POSTING DATE 126H94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135384 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $834.36 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
135385 JAVID CONTRACTORS,INC. $87.291.65 CONSTRUCTION P2-23-5-1
135386 JAY'S CATERING $357.84 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE
135387 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $1.789.61 GAUGE
13SWO JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $89.70 ELECTRIC PARTS
135389 JONES CHEMICALS.INC. $1.976.99 CHEMICALS
135390 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $388.29 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
135391 KAMAN BEARINGS&SUPPLY $749.16 MACHINE SUPPLIES
135392 KELLY SERVICES $1.021.39 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES
135393 KING BEARING,INC. $1,318.55 MACHINE SUPPLIES
135394 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.922.45 TOOLS
135395 LCD POWER SYSTEMS $2,149.43 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135396 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $570.11 CELLULAR TELEPHONE CHARGES
135397 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $444.72 PUMP PARTS
135398 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L.LAVOIE S433.15 LEGAL SERVICES-NRZEN
135399 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGR. $39,639.78 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140-2
135400 CHARLES P.CROWLEY CO. $1,038.08 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135401 LEWCO ELECTRIC $477.53 TRUCK PARTS
M 135402 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $126,447.10 DEFERRED COMP TRUSTEE
X 135403 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $2,280.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIRONMENTAL
135404 SOHO-LYNCH CORP. $137.91 JANITORIAL SERVICES
DO 135405 MPS $122.46 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
135406 MANDIC MOTORS $59.00 TOWING SERVICES
135407 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $898,451.00 CONSTRUCTION P2.42-2
135408 MARVAC ELECTRONICS S286.80 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
r
135409 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $572.71 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
135411 MIDWAY TA WESTERN MACHINING E7,$52.92 LAB SUPPLIES
1354H MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRIES. $52.92 LAB SUPPLIES -
135412 MINTIE CORP. $2,040.00 HVAC REPAIRS
135413 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,480.72 UNIFORM RENTALS
135414 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $760.00 LAB SERVICES
135415 MORTON SALT $484.68 SALT
135416 NASCO WEST,INC. $250.26 LAB SUPPLIES
135417 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $5,821.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135418 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $502.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135419 NEWWEST ELECTRONICS $369.95 LAB SUPPLIES
135420 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $38.11 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135421 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL $200.000.00 NEW HEALTH ACCOUNT
135422 OI CORPORATION $189.18 LAB SUPPLIES
135423 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $536.88 SAFETY GLASSES
135424 OFFICE PAVILIONSANTERIOR RESOURCES $35.00 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS
135425 OX SYSTEMS CO. $7,197.44 CHLORINE M.O.11-18.92
135426 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL E2,016.82 CHEMICALS
135427 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. S2,404.49 FITTINGS
135428 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS $13.41 PUBLICATION
135429 OXYGEN SERVICE $6,647.61 SPECIALTY GASES
FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1119194 PAGE 05
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 126/94 POSTING DATE 126/94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135430 PSI $225.79 STEAM CLEANING SERVICES
135431 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $236.06 OPERATING SUPPLIES
135432 PSSI $1.312.50 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
135433 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $470.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
13MM PACIFIC PARTS $164.83 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135435 PACIFIC SEWER MAINTENANCE CO. $9,517.00 SEWER REPAIRS
135436 PACIFIC BELL $125.55 TELEPHONE SERVICES
135437 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $188.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS
135438 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $743.97 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
135439 PAKWEST $615.52 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
135"0 PARTS UNLIMITED $233.76 TRUCK PARTS
135441 PASCAL B LUDWIG $62,510.40 CONSTRUCTION PI-42
135442 PASCAL B LUDWIG $381.640.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-38-2
135443 PASCAL 8 LUDWIG.INC. $71,527.50 CONSTRUCTION P2.43.1
135444 ROY PENDERGRAFT $124.05 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
135445 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $2,902.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135446 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS,INC. $25,657.26 CHEMICALS
m 136447 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $129,658.23 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91
X 135448 PITNEY BOWES $270.18 POSTAGE MACHINE SERVICE AGREEMENT
2 135M9 POLYMETRICS, INC. $23,972.51 LAB SUPPLIES
tz 13M50 POLYPURE,INC. $17,380.63 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
135451 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $252.20 CHEMICALS
-I 135452 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $109.00 ICE
135453 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $164.00 FENCING INSTALLATION
1 135454 QUEST MEDIA B SUPPLIES $3.001.79 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135465 R M CONTROLS $421.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135456 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,080.97 ELECTRIC MOTORS
135457 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $2,610.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135458 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $1,699.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135469 BOLT DELIVERY $95.34 FREIGHT
135460 REISH MARINE STUDIES.INC. $1.800.00 OCEAN MONITORING
135461 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $472.07 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
136462 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT.CORP. $95.55 LAB SUPPLIES
135463 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $2.299.42 ELECTRIC PARTS
135464 SARBS-PDC $11,500.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
135465 DOUG SARVIS $750.00 CPRIFIRST AID TRAINING
135466 SCHAEFER DIXON ASSOCIATES $1,100.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.11-18-92
135467 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $153,411.07 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-9.93
135468 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $73.97 TOOLS
135469 MARC SHIPMAN $2,700.00 GROUNDSKEEPING SERVICES
135470 SHURELUCK SALES $10,420.84 TOOLS/HARDWARE
135471 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $50.34 LAB SUPPLIES
135472 SKYPARK WALL-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $221.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
135473 SOLO NEOTRONICS $871.85 METER
135474 SO.CALIF.EDISON CO. $24,790.00 ELECTRICAL SERVICE REPAIRS
135475 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. $105.169.11 POWER
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1119/94 PAGE O6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1/20M POSTING DATE 7/28194
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135476 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $20,017.12 NATURAL GAS
135477 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $57.36 WATER USE
135478 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $994.13 DIESEUUNLEADED FUEL
135479 SOUVENIR PHOTO $215.06 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
135480 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,078.11 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
135481 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $3.887.64 METER
135482 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $2.800.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2
135483 WESTALLOY,INC. $243.22 WELDING SUPPLIES
135484 STANCO'S VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE $5,296.41 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
135485 GARY G.STREED - $7,489.51 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
135486 STROMBOTINE PRINTING $355.58 PRINTING
13507 SUMMIT STEEL $1,323.56 METAL
135488 SUNSET FORD $312.95 TRUCK PARTS
135489 SUPELCO,INC. $576.55 LAB SUPPLIES
135490 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1.325.43 CHEMICALS
135491 SUPER ICE CORP. $92.22 LAB SUPPLIES
135492 SUR-LITE CORPORATION $600.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
135493 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $532.12 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
m 135494 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $2.220.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
X 135495 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK $10.266.10 TRUSTEE SERVICES
2
CO 135497 TRANSMANINDUSTRIAL SUPPLY ,854.29 MECHANICAL PARTS
135498 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES
INC. $$894.19 TRAVEL
INSTRUMENT PARTS
135499 TRAVEL AUTO
$456.03 TRAVEL SERVICES
DO 135500 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. .047.36 TRUCK PARTS
135501 JG TUCKAILER
LABS $2,662.14 LAB SERVICES
01 135501 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $$58.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS
136603 TWININ LABOODGERATORIES
997.28 TRULAB SERVICES
PARTS
135504 TWINING LABORATORIES $9,$75.30 LAB SERVICES
135504 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS E75.30 TRUCK PARTS
135505 U.S.C.SPONSORED PROJECTS ACCT. $17.050.52 TECHNICAL SERVICES
135506 THE UNISOURCE CORP. $649.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES
135507 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $264.55 PARCEL SERVICES
135508 VWR SCIENTIFIC $195.28 LAB SUPPLIES
135509 VALLEY CRIES SUPPLY CO. $1,271.54 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135510 VAN NOSTRAND REINHOLD $67.88 BOOK
135511 VILLAGE NURSERIES $41.43 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
135512 CARL WARREN&CO. $300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
135513 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $15,624.05 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92
135514 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $5.50 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
135515 DICK WILLIAMS/BILL ROBERTS $1,500.00 SECURITY CONSULTANTS
135516 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN 146,535.44 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92
135517 XEROX CORP. 6.553.26 COPIER LEASES
135518 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. 6,158.80 LAB SUPPLIES
135619 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. 89.58 LAB SUPPLIES
1355M JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. 35.04 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135521 RICHARD YOUNG PROD. 181.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1119194 PAGE 07
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1/26194 POSTING DATE 1/26/94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135522 ZIEBARTH 8 ALPER/C.S.ALPER $15,089.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
135523 ZYMARK CORP. $12,261.75 LAB EQUIPMENT
135524 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
53,610,279.72
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND $950.64
92 OPER FUND 25,816.17
03 OPER FUND 22,727.39
#3 CAP FAC FUND 370.79
#5 OPER FUND 3,260.11
05 CAP FAC FUND 12.01
#8 OPER FUND 752AO
06 CAP FAC FUND 115.50
nl #7 OPER FUND 15,544.11
x #7 CAP FAC FUND 7,404.24
2 #11 OPER FUND 7,464.89
#11 CAP FAC FUND 4,394.90
#13 OPER FUND 34.90
—1 #14 OPER FUND 788.82
4586 OPEN FUND 4,290.77
#586 CAP FAC FUND 1.845.35
#687 OPERFUND 2,110.86
07814 OPER FUND 7,162.59
JT OPER FUND 752.456.67
CORF 2,238,857.31
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 16,196.82
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 497,711.48
53.610279.72
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714)962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
MARCH 9, 1994 - 7:30 P.M.
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code
Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the
meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda
item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be
submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in
compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda
posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
(16) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any:
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing consideration of item (16)(c)
listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and
which requires action at this time pursuant to authority of
Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2).
(b) Verbal report of General Counsel
(c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint
for Property Damage, La Veta Monterey Condominium Association, a
California non-profit, mutual benefit corporation; and Robert Segesta,
an individual vs. Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. and
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, Orange County
Superior Court, Case No. 726220, relative to property damage
sustained during the construction of the Memory Lane Interceptor,
Contract No. 2-30, and authorize the District's General Counsel to
appear and defend the interests of the District or to select special
counsel to represent the District (see attached memorandum).
FOUNTAIN VALLEY l.,A.TMES
�,A•TMfiS e MONDAY.JULY 19.HV3
�.ao-9:
SUNDAY FEBRUARY27 1990/t* City Workers to Get i"9)tA COUNTY
a
Raises from Windfall j luntington Beach
Tustin Police,
City employees will receive pay rais- `*Trustees OK Pay,
es as a result of a program to share the 4v,
Other City wealth if the city prospered this year. benefits Increases
City Manager Ray Kromer said the • .
city realized savings of about $500,000 •1;an�:•:i.:::ea 4. :r
for the fiscal year ending in June.Under HUNTINGTON BEACH—Hum-
the program, employees will receive a 'tlagton Brach Union High School
Workers to Get percentage of the savings•amounting to District trueness have ratified con-
about$100,00D. tracts giving all district employees
Kromer said the remainder of the a 45% pay increase and a 1.25%
money will go into the city's reserves. ' hike In benefits.
Savings resulted from not filling 15 Job The new one-year contracts for
2.5% Raises
nclud-
vi,cancfes in which the employees ab- 'more than 1200 employees.illion.
/ Raises sorbed the workload, no rate increases •:grul teachers,irkYost$2S mie on.
for outside contracts and higher sales tax toTrustee Dirk Voss cast the only
revenue than anticipated,Kromer said ' Pots against. the agreement lac[
The City Council recently approved week Voss said that employees
giving out the pay hikes to employees. have done a good job but that
TUSTIN—Salary Increases o[ Kromer said the"profit-sharing"Idea ' trustees should delay a pay in-
2.5% have been approved.for mu- was an innovative approach because of •creaseBBe until they have long-range
m
projections on how to save money
Ncipel workers1n three employee
groups,including the ee a the uncertain economic outlook and the for the district
The action was approved want- effect of state revenue cutbacks on the Voss said"the district:will ime.
mouely by the City Council last city's general-fund budget. about M,000. from its ieaerve
week. 'There was no way automatic raises hind to pay for* the salary and
could he guaranteed:' Kromer said. benefitincreases. '1',
Alter negotiations that erected N ' r ra Ro 3 i -. '
Oct "But If we cut expenses, and we had Assistant Supt.Susan Ro ar
city an, representatives from the P said
city and the unions agreed to savings, then everybody could share in -.�;the district has a reserve of W.87
one-year contracts retroactive to the savings." ;million,or 6.2%of its budget after
Kromer added that if there was no
Jan.1.officials saidthe ;paying the eatery and benefit in-
hiisaddition m the pay raise, extra money or employees
city had broken !creases The ethedistrict's reserve >e
even financially, employees would not
employees with one dependent wW have received the pay bonuses. .;more than twice the reserve that
receive an additional $23 a month. ��•the state requires of school dis-
for medical Insurance premiums; The savings windfall will be shared ;;tricta.she sell. . ._.__ ...
among 1 e employees, which includesand - ..(toper also said the benefits in-
general employees. professional tmen and ��g nee pays only for rising costa of
technical groups, Fire Department eta- `hiklth Insurance and doesn't rep-
-and management and city de- - _recent additional benefits.
pertinent heads. "_ psfee Michael Simone held
The pay raises,retroactive to Aug.19, 6ht employees hadn't received a
mount to4
between $20 a month and x7- increase in two years and
$100 a month, depending on the em- erred a pay raise for doing a
ployee'eJob classification,Kromer said. od Joti abd being foul employ-
-DEBRA CANO -.
:: Hoard President Jerry SuWvan
.;;skid the district has the money for
�.��.�.�.._�,,,. •- "t6_g pay increase "because it has
ed well and is in good shape.
NEWPOR'F.BEACH hp rase the bottom failing natP
r[ ;
Three dty otfiaas- ot[ `raises
Monday night#rani. fife:pity
Council; -on �opthe':-
Cent cos aincrease ;.
all city emplo �'"` s iecei_veii
•Jan.`s an��g�� �� � t girt: '
increase
to receive
V
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
3-9-94
11 Presentation of Plaques and Resolutions to Retiring
Directors.
As you know, several of our directors recently retired from
the Boards and we would like to acknowledge their efforts
on behalf of the Districts' with the presentation of a plaque
and a resolution expressing the Boards' appreciation for
their outstanding service.
Over the years, these directors have not only performed
their duties as City Council or Sanitary District members
with a high degree of professionalism and dedication, but
they have also been equally involved in the wastewater
management program of the Sanitation Districts.
- Item 1 Continued on Next Page -
y
Director's Name ciw District(s) Attending?
Bob Bell Villa Park 2 Give to
Barry Denes
James Evans Midway City 3 Yes
Sanitary
Gail Kerry Cypress 3
Eva Miner La Palma 3
Maria Moreno Placentia 2
Rob Richardson Santa Ana 1
Jim Silva Huntington Bch 3 Yes
Hank Wedaa Yorba Linda 2
- Item 2 on Next Page -
s
2) Upcoming Meetings
A. Fiscal Policy Committee - The Fiscal Policy Committee
is scheduled to meet on Wednesday. March 16. at 5:30
P.m.
B. Executive Committee - The Executive Committee is
scheduled to meet on Wednesday. March 23. at 5 :30 p.m .
Invite two of the following Directors to attend and
participate in the discussions:
Jan Debay and Barry Denes
-or-
Burnie Dunlap or Norman Eckenrode
Item 2 Continued on Next Page -
C. Special Joint Works Selection Committee Re
Computers - The Special Joint Works Selection Committee
Re Computers is scheduled to meet on Wednesday. March
30. at 5:30 p.m.
- End of Report -
wpdoc\g m\jcrpts\jc03.94
.r
ro .. DATE March 9, 1994 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 5 14
A; Iga ,FONT BOARDS
IBEYEw ............ BARRERA ......... ✓ BIEYERI ..............SARREM ..........
✓ —
IREADEI ............ MC OUMAN ......- - IFORSYTIIEI .. .........BROWN .............
WORM............. FERRYMAN ........ WO ..............CATLIN. ............$
IFONTIOUM ......... SALTMIEW........ (SCOTT) .............:COLUNS ...........JG
ISTEINEm ........... STANTON ......... . BIEBAYI 6SI1 . . . ..........._
.............. —
SOFPQ
BAY
ISAN). .. ............DENES ............ A! —
DISTRICT 2 WELU. ...............GENES ............JG —
ISCOTTI ............ COLLINSPICKER .......... JL WELSONI EILERI .......BLKENRmicAp DE ........ _
(DAILY) ............. IMARER .......... J_.S✓G__ IRAERTZWE.... .......EOLENRAN ...... —
IBEYERI ............ BAw1ERA ......... W IMMOI ............. FERRYMAN .........Nom —
IBELLP. . ........... GRIN .......... IMANONEYI .... ...... .FLORA ........ —
RMAERTZ. LENT ..... DEKES ........... JL IBONO ...............GRIFFIN
ULLM N ........7
IMAERIZWESERI ..... ECKENRODF ....... ,� —_ —_ IWELCHI ......... .....OULIMSON ........ —
(FLORA) ............ MAHONEY ......... M/ IWARDI ..............HAMMOND ......... _
MARKETS ........... NELSON .......... _W KING ................HART .............
GUM ............. BYLMM ........... J[ IMOUL�ATIERSOM .. LEIPZIO............ —
MS NERI ........... STANTON ......... IMNERI . . ............LWN . . ............ —
IOULUXSONI......... MIELCH ........... INC OUIOANI ..........LUTZ . .. ..........ISINGEA) ............ ZLAKET........... JG IFLOAAI ..............F.NHONEY ......... —
ILUTZI . ..............MC OUIOAN ........
DISTRICT S IPoLDOI ..............MORENO .......... —
ESTRADAI .......... SAPET ........... Er/ IROBITAILLEI ...........MOULTON-PAlTFRSON _
WELSOM ........... MORO I, .......... __,e MARKER) .............NELSON ........... —
(FORSYTHO ......... BRONN ........... JC IDUNLAM .............PARKER
INORSYI ............ G1LN ........... INICHOLSOM ..........PARTW............ _
(SCOTT) .. ........ COIIM .......... IOALYI ...............PH:KLER ........... —
IMAHONEYI ......... FLORA ........ IPUCKETFI ............PONTIOUS .........
IBONEI ............. (lit._... .y ISALTARELLD ..........waETT .......... —
IMINEm ............ w . ILUTZI ...............F%, MP. ........... —
IMC OUIOANI ........ LUTZ............. IEVANS) ..............RICE . . ............� —
IROBRAILW ......... MOULTON-PAT IERSON IPoNTIWSF ...........SALTARELLI ......
NICHOLSONI ........ MRTN ........... IDEBAYI ..............SANSONE ..........
DALYI ............. PM]LL01 .......... IESTRADAI ............SAFEJ ............41
IEVANSI ............ RICE ............. (ZLAKETI .............AI Mfi............— _—
RLAKET) ...........JNSNP........... STENER) .... .........STANTON ..........� _
ISTENERI ........... STANTON ......... M NI TANTO ... .........STENER . .......... or
ISElVA00R.......... SYLVM ........... IMVLMFU ..............SWAN . .............
ISELVAO04........... SYLVIA............ —
DISTRICT 5 IPERSYMCHEAFflO ......WANNER ..........JL —
IDEBAYI ............4141 ............. IOULUXSONI...........MUCH .......
....
IDEIMY1 ....... SANSONE ......... IROBRAILLO .......... N WCHELL ......... —
ISTANTONI .......... STEINER .......... IS NOERI ..............ZLAKET ...........JG
DISTRICT B STAFF OTHERS
IPERRYI ............ WA111lR.......... SYLVESTER..LI WOODRUFF .
ICOXI . ............. HART ............ MOWN . ... ANWAR .... _
ANDERSON . . DEMIR .....
ISTANTOM .......... STENER . . ... .....
— CLAWSON .. FUMING ... JG
DISTRICT 7 DAMS..... HOHENER ... —
IWAPoI IWMMOND . ....... HASENSTAS . HOUGH ....
ISCHFAFEw ......... WANNER .......... HODOES .... HOWARD ...
KYLE ...... HUNT . .....
(BEYER) ........ BARRERA ......... LNOER . .... mow .....
ISANSONEI .......... DEBAV . . ......... NELLOR LEE . ...... _
01ILD01 . ........... MORENO . ......... NICHOW.... LINDSTROM .
ISALTARELLB ........ —
(STANTON) .......... STEINER . ..•••.... OOTEN ..... .e LYNCH .....
SIMFSON . ..-G SHAW
DISTRICT 11 STREED .... STONE ..... .
POSITAILLE) ......... WINCHEIL ........: VNCENT. ... WAGON
YOUNG _
IMOULTON�PATTFRSONI LEIPZIO .......... w . /W�INBOR . ... YOUNG —
ISTEINEm ........... STANTON . ....... Sy,`S�
DISTRICT 13
IWELCHI .. ......... . OULIIXSON ........ w
ISEYERI ............ BAARERA .........
IDUNLAP
ALY) . ........... PARKE MAIYI R ......... T (�L/
ID ........... PICKIER ..........
ISTANTONI .......... SIENEII ..........
DISTRICT 14
IMILLERI ............ SWAN ............
IPUCKETT .......... �Jy),,L{(�
IBEYERI ............ BARREN ......... fI�-" ' DLro3.E
(WARD) .......... HAMMOND ....... 021M94
ISTANTONI .......... STENER .......... . —
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
March 9, 1994 BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
Please Print Please Print
CSOOG . L*
Allfw 4,/LSGr- CSdoc•
n 4 vl= Ji9rn I LT l a v,E
ts4b
C
-d
So/
0
� so
Te ctOcc - So/
MnV 4 C S 0 Tol
ifif .J c
CAeL E. BCACN Csoac Sol
•�� 1 � CzDoC SOI
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS
OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM
TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING.
AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE
SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES.( c l�
DATE: �- ` ' I 1 AGENDA ITEM NO.
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) L L C N �� I
HOME ADDRESS:
(NUMBER/STREET
(CITY ZIP CODE)
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING:
SELF OR NAME OF ORGANIZATION)
F28A
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS
OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM
TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING.
AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE
SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES.
DATE: 3 AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (PLEASE PRINT)
HOME ADDRESS: 14b5 Lr/. 3/C� .ST.
(NUMBER STREET 9p0 S�
"s iVCELZIP l� 10
Gill, �7.f
CITY ODE
TELEPHONE:
REPRESENTING: INDE LbC?L SO/
(SELF OR NAME OF ORGANIZAT ON
F28A
FORM OF MOTION
1 . Direct Executive Committee to consider at its next meeting, whether to retain
an independent consultant to undertake value engineering and investigate the
issues set out in The Register article.
2. If Executive Committee approves the hiring of a consultant, that it be
authorized to solicit proposals.
03/09/94 JOINT BOARD MEETING
#3 - Appointment of Chairman oro tem
District 3 - Director Wally Linn was appointed Chairman pro tern for District 3 due
to Chairman and Chairman pro tem being absent.
#5 - Public Comments
JC: I have two people who have indicated a willingness to speak. The first is
Ellen Ray and then David L. Hamilton. Customary time limit is five minutes.
Ellen Ray: I am on the employees' bargaining committee for the Operations and
Maintenance Employees. I would like to ask that you read and consider the packet
given to you tonight by the negotiating committee. If you haven't received this
packet, one of your employees, Joe Park, has one in the corner there for you.
We have been negotiating in good faith since September 14, 1993. From the start
we were told there was no Districts' money available for anything. We accepted
this as truth. Then we were told there was some money but it is only for those
employees who work a 12-hour shift. Something is wrong here, folks. We want
to reach an agreement with the Districts and we ask your support in achieving this
goal. Thank you very much.
David L. Hamilton: Good evening everybody. I hope this is the last time I am
going to have to be here this year. I hate to waste your valuable time but there is
a necessity for it and that's why I'm here.
We, like some of you, are skeptical to the amount of information you receive. We
read in the newspapers like everybody else. This is very, very important to us.
This could be our livelihood for quite a while here. I say our because I represent to
your people here. We want to make sure that you see what our last proposal is
because we've been told that this proposal can't come back to the Board and a
few of the people that make the decision, we believe it should come back to you.
We're not very far apart monetarily. You can afford where we are at, I am sure.
We've looked at your budget and there Is nothing that separates us from coming to
an agreement as far as the monetary issues are concerned. We are very, very
close folks. We don't need to argue over pennies. Most of our issues are not
really cost issues. They are issues of very much importance to us but they don't
cost you anything. We understand the political motivation of this Board but I think
it's time for you to stop and put politics aside and say, "these are your people.
These are what they deserve. The hell with politics. These are people that work
hard for a living. They do a damn good job and they should be rewarded thusly".
-1-
Look at this proposal carefully and give us a response that we know is from you.
We want to know what your response. Give us that indication. Remember, these
people do work hard, are very competent and they are your employees and your
constituents. I will be available if anyone has any questions later or if you have
now, please don't be afraid to ask.
X6(a) - Joint Chairman's Report
JC: This evening we are going to present some plaques and resolutions to retiring
Directors. As you know, several of our Directors recently retired from the Boards
and we would like to acknowledge their efforts with the presentation of a plaque
and a resolution expressing the Boards' appreciation for their outstanding service.
Over the years these Directors have not only performed their duty as City Council
or Sanitary District members with a high degree of professionalism and dedication,
but they have also been equally involved in the wastewater management program
and the Sanitation Districts.
I would like Bob Bell, I think Bob was not going to be here but Barry, I think you
were going to take Bob's plaque.
Jim Evans (JC presented resolution; VJC presented plaque). Mr. Evans stated it
was a pleasure working with the Districts.
Jim Silva (JC presented resolution; VJC presented plaque). Mr. Silva thanked the
staff. Also thanked the elected body and working with them.
JC: I don't believe that Director Eva Miner, Gail Kerry, Maria Moreno, Rob
Richardson or Hank Wedaa are here. We'll make presentations to them later.
Upcoming Meetings:
Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, March 16th, at
5:30 p.m.
The Executive Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, March 23rd,
at 5:30 p.m. I would like to ask Jan Debay and Barry Denes to be there.
Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers is scheduled to meet
on Wednesday, March 30th at 5:30 p.m.
#6(b) - Report of the General Manaaer
JWS: As you know, we are having a New Directors' Orientation and Treatment
Plant Tour. It has been scheduled for Saturday, March 19th from 9:00 a.m. to
-2-
1:30 p.m. We have sent information to all of you and a form. Those of you who
have not yet returned the RSVP form, we put another copy in your folders tonight
so that we could do the proper planning. I would appreciate it if you could
complete this form and either leave it in your folder or with the clerk this evening.
Some of you who may have a conflict, we'll try to schedule maybe a follow-up
orientation and tour in a month or so. This is called a New Directors' Orientation
and Tour but all Directors are encouraged to attend. That completes my report.
#61c) - Report of the General Counsel
TLW: There is just one item. There is a supplemental agenda item for District
No. 1 . The District received a Summons and Complaint today and I think the
Chairman is going to add that to the agenda just prior to going into closed session.
Other than that I have no report.
#9d - Consent Calendar
JC: I would just like to point out for the record that as the agenda was written
there was a mistake on Item 9(j)(2), the resolution number in the agenda should be
94-35-6. It was correct in your packet but just so that you understand if you
notice the discrepancy on that item. Is there anyone that would like to remove any
items from the Consent Calendar?
Director John Collins: Mr. Chairman, item #9d, please. We are being asked to
approve four new vehicles, one of them going to the motor pool, one going to
operations, one going to planning and design and one going to construction
management. I would like to move the two vehicles, the motor pool vehicle and
operations vehicle, and hold back on the other two vehicles. I find no
substantiation for these vehicles. I have no complaint on the prices involved. I
think they are good prices. I met with the Department Head that these vehicles
are to be assigned to and I still do not have a clear substantiation, cost-effective or
use of those vehicles so I would like to ask that they be removed and those two
vehicles come back with a better description to the Directors. I think at this time
we're spending a lot of money on things we ought to be very careful that we know
exactly where it's going. If it is appropriate at this time I would like to move the
passage of Item 9(d) to include only the two vehicles going to the motor pool and
operations.
Second.
Director Pickier: Does that affect the price of the two vehicles?
JWS: These are purchased under the State procurement contract. The only
reason it might be affected is if there is a deadline that we can't meet if we bring
-3-
them back at a later date. It is a per vehicle price, however.
TMD: The vehicle for the planning and design would be a third vehicle in that
group. There are 24 people in the group and they share two vehicles now. When
they don't have these, they go to the motor pool and get some out. This would
add a third vehicle.
The vehicle for the construction management would be used by the supervisors in
Construction Management. There was a pick-up truck that I found after I talked
with Director Collins that was given to the guards and that is what it is really
replacing.
Director Moreno: Are the vehicles really needed?
TMD: We've had an orderly program to replace vehicles to try to keep good
vehicles needed, but we can certainly wait.
Stanton: I would like to ask what our policy is as far as personal use of these
cars. Are any of your employees taking cars home?
TMD: Yes. In the Construction Management group there is probably four or five
supervisors who take the vehicles home. In the design group there is one
supervisor that takes a vehicle home.
Stanton: At some point, consider it a request, I would like to see a list of how
many people are allowed to take Districts' vehicles home and also I understand
from some preliminary questions that were asked by some of my staff that you
need some of these to just go from plant to plant or drive around the plant?
TMD: We use them for, the people who get the vehicles such as these are those
who go out of the plant or go between plants. The inspectors and people within
the plant use electric golf carts or bikes.
Rice: You said that if they need a car and over the two that they go to the car
pool and get one. How many cars do you have in the car pool?
TMD: I don't know that. Mr. Hodges would know.
EH: The question is how many cars do we have in the motor pool?
Rice: Yes
EH: We have approximately six sedans, three or four pick-ups and
-4-
Ferryman: Does the District have a policy where all departments as far as who
gets to take the car home or is it a haphazard thing from department to
department?
JWS: Our policy is that those people who are most likely to be called back for an
emergency are those that are assigned a vehicle that they can take home.
Lutz: Is there a policy or are people using their own car and being reimbursed for
their mileage?
TMD: Yes, they are being reimbursed.
Lutz: Is that a norm or is the norm to get a Districts car?
TMD: We want them to take a Sanitation Districts car if one is available and only
use their own car if nothing is available.
Lutz: And, the reason being?
TMD: I think it is insurance.
Stanton: Is either one or the other or both of these two cars that are excluded by
Director Collins motion in that category of cars that might be taken home used for
personal use?
TMD: Yes, one of them would replace the Construction Managers car and he
would be giving his to someone else and he would drive that home.
Barrera: Regarding sedans - having to use pickups and I would also like to know
call back for emergency. How many times a month does that happen; how often
do these emergencies happen where they have to come back here that would
demand a car?
JWS: I don't have those numbers with me. Perhaps one of the department heads
could speak for their own department.
Barrera: A report?
JWS: We could do that.
Debay: Two questions - if these two cars are deleted, would this affect our
performance at all and the second question is, you mentioned insurance? Does
this place us at any risk to use a personal car? Are we risking something?
-5-
TMD: If the cars are deleted we can continue throughout Engineering. I can't
answer the insurance question.
TLW: Maybe I can comment on that. I think the Directors may know the Districts
are entirely self-insured. We have no liability insurance and that is based on a
policy of valuation that has been made and in place for a number of years. We
have a very substantial contingency reserved money for liability and it has proven
to be very economically beneficial to the Districts to do.
The policy is generally to discourage individuals from using their own car for two
reasons. One, if the individual uses his own car, he really has an obligation to
personally report it to his insurance company that his car will now be used for
business purposes and therefore his policy will be re-rated from personal use to
business use. His premium will go up so the Districts would be faced with either
forcing the individual to absorb a cost (which is really a Districts cost) or to
reimburse that individual. Secondly, you have a liability question when the
individual is using his car, whether his insurance should be called upon to respond
in damages or whether the Districts have to step in and leads to a legal tussle as to
who should be at fault primarily to answer to any such complaint so the policy has
been to really very very narrowly limit the use of the private vehicles.
Pickier: I guess in looking at these four. The first two are to replace and I read the
last two as additional. I don't think they have given us a good reason of why they
need two additional now. If they were replacing, I can understand. I think Collins
has a valid point that they come back and give us some good reasons for needing
the additional vehicles or they are replacing some vehicles, I think we should know
that.
Gullixson: Is there any reason why we shouldn't wait for the report to place an
order for all four? If we decide to do it eventually, do it all at once?
Hodges: The state contract for sedans - the drop dead date for purchasing these
vehicles is March 15 or 17. If we waited a month we would miss that window of
opportunity. We did go out and make sure that the prices are an acceptable price.
We did go out and solicit some bids from the private industry and found that on
the average the costs of these sedans was around $1,800 - $2,000 a piece higher
for an equivalent sedan.
JC: Further discussion? We have a motion and a second on the floor.
Call for the question.
JC: Any opposition to the motion? Motion passes - unanimous consent.
-6-
#11 - Summary Financial Report
Hart: On the first page under "Other Reserves". Is that ------ individual Districts ---
-----?
GGS: There was a white staff report that accompanied this article. There is a
summary on the front and then the individual financial statements are attached to
that. The question is, as I understand it, is on the first page, the numbers that
have come from the budget document that was approved approximately a year
ago. All of those reserves, the construction reserves and the other reserves are
held in the individual Districts. None of those reserves are held in any joint reserve
or in any place like that. Those are appropriated for various things - debt service,
operating requirements, dry period requirements, Insurance, things of that sort.
#12(b) - KPMG and "Bia Six"
JC: Director Stanton will be reflected as an abstention.
#13 - Job Nos. P1-48: P2-47-2: P2-56 and P2-53-2
TMD: This project is a combination of four smaller projects and includes various
repairs of equipment and replacement of older equipment in plants. It includes
safety items such as installing new handrails around the plants and as the Directors
are aware, you have authorized an extensive seismic rehabilitation program and it
includes two buildings at Plant No. 2, seismic strengthening of those buildings.
On February 1st we received four bids for this project ranging from the low
submitted by Pascal and Ludwig of $1,003,899.00 to a high of $1,774,430.00.
The recommended action is to approve two addenda which changed the bid date
and clarified a miscellaneous issues and to award to low bidder, Pascal and Ludwig
in the amount of $1,003,899.00.
Barrera: Has this contractor done work for us before?
TMD: Yes, this contractor has worked for us and is working for us presently.
(Tape Ended)
#16 - Supplemental Agenda
JC: I think what I will do is I will advance the item that we had which was a
supplemental item this evening for District No. 1 before we go into closed session.
TLW: The item for District No. 1 is the district had a construction project about a
-7-
year for a pipeline project known as the Memory Lane Interceptor. It was a joint
project between the City of Orange, City of Santa Ana and the Districts. During
the course of excavation there was some ----- as the result of some storms last
winter. The complaint is for some property damage. It is not a significant dollar
amount. We have an indemnity provision with the general contractor, Mladen
Buntich. In addition, since we had this claim in we negotiated as part of the final
closeout agreement a supplemental indemnification with the contractor. While we
do have to appear and defend the Districts we will probably succeed immediately
and have the contractors insurance company take over the defense at no cost to
the Districts.
I think we passed over item 16(a). In order to take the action as set forth in 16(b)
in the Supplemental, we first need a motion to add it to the agenda. This was just
received today and we only have 30 days in which to file the answer in Superior
Court.
JC: Deemed approved. Now we will go for the recommended action.
McGuigan: Has this work been completed so it will not delay this completion for
the whole project?
TLW: Where this location is done, this job has been done in this area for six
months.
Barrera: Being in the City of Orange, I would like to know what the damages will
be and what it was?
TLW: The location is at the corner of Parker and La Veta and there was an
excavation adjacent to the freeway underpass and at the time of the excavation
the contractor struck a water line that was owned by the City of Orange. It was
not known at the time and apparently it caused some subsidence. Then there was
an open trench, a fairly trench, this pipe was 34 to 36 feet deep. He had a "glory
hole" there. The storms came and flooded it and didn't realize there was a crack in
the water line.
It resulted in the adjacent condominium that is an apartment condominium project
and they claimed that some of their patio slabs have sunk and the patio walls
cracked. The complaint is very unique; it talks about a 1/16 inch crack in the
walls. We tried immediately and the contractor tried immediately to just walk it.
In fact, the contractor did enter the site and did make repairs on several patio slabs
directly adjacent to Parker Street. This is a follow-up to that and Mladen Buntich
has assumed the role of picking up.
Barrera: Attorneys ??
-B-
TLW: I really can't be sure. I think he was going back several months ago when
the claims came in. As I recall, it seems that we had some conversations; not me
personally but someone from my office.
JC: Deemed approved.
#14 - Closed Session
TLW: The purpose of the closed session is for two reasons. One, the District
management representatives wish to review the status of labor negotiations
between the Districts employee groups and the Directors. Secondly, the Districts
has reason to believe that there is a potential for a claim to be filed against the
Districts as a result of an accident at the Treatment Plant No. 2.
Stanton: I just want it real clear before we adjourn for the closed session that we
are not going to be engaged in any discussion of whether newspaper reports are or
are not correct. As far as I'm concerned any discussion of that nature should be
done in full public session.
JC: You are correct. They will not be discussed. However, there would be two
of them probably that would have to be discussed in closed session that involve
litigation if we were to talk about them. The only thing we are going into closed
session now for are these two matters.
Stanton: I am just registering my own personal objection. If we are in closed
session and we get into those things which I think, as one individual, everyone else
can speak for themselves, should be discussed in open session.
JC: Fine. No disagreement. Director Collins?
Collins: Mr. Chairman, I had spoken to you previous to this meeting about a
motion that I would like to make regarding this. Since we are not going to be
discussing this item in closed session, would it be appropriate to make this
motion?
JC: You can do it now.
Collins: I would like to make a motion that the Boards direct the Executive
Committee (EC) to consider at its next meeting whether to retain an independent
consultant to undertake value engineering and investigate the issues set out in the
Register newspaper article. If the EC approves the hiring of a consultant that they
(the EC) be authorized to solicit proposals from that consultant.
JC: Why don't we go ahead and set it on the agenda, John and move at that? By
-9-
the order of the Chair, it will be set on the agenda?
Collins: I would like to make it a motion that will take the onus off of you, Bill.
JC: I don't have any onus. Fine, we have a motion and a second.
Stanton: Maker of the motion, I would strongly support that motion if it is very
clear that the consultant is reporting to the Directors and not to the staff or Legal
Counsel.
Collins: Yes, that would be my idea. I think the words do so say.
JC: I think, John, what you are saying is it is to be discussed in the EC in regards
to this and we are not going to necessarily, you can certainly, Director Stanton,
speak your mind at the EC, but nonetheless I think the motion is let's discuss it
and decide if we are going to do it and if so, then the second part was that we
would be authorized to go ahead and proceed with an RFP.
Collins: The EC would be pre-authorized if they so decided to go ahead and start
interviewing the consultant because I don't want to delay here and wait for
another meeting, have to come back before us and then we go back to them.
Perhaps it would be the pleasure of the EC to even form a further subcommittee
from its members to go out and interview these people to make it happen fast. I
think it is in the best service of all the Directors, employees and staff as well as the
constituents to get this matter resolved in a very timely and equitable fashion.
JC: Agreed. Director Stanton?
Stanton: Mr. Chairman, if you could just clarify for me. It is my understanding the
motion as to whether we should or should not embark on this is to, and that issue
is to be decided by this entire board, did I misunderstand you sir that the EC would
be deciding that?
JC: I believe the motion was that the EC would discuss whether or not we would
do it and if, in fact, they decided that it would be done that they would have the
authorization to go out for an RFP. Isn't that what you said, John?
Collins: I feel comfortable, Mr. Stanton, that the EC can make that decision. I feel
comfortable with that.
JC: Alright, we're in discussion. Director Moreno?
Moreno: I think all of us should make that decision ------
-10-
Leipzig: I would appreciate that coming back to the Boards, the full Boards as
well. I would like to hear the rationale, the value of the engineering study, the
type of consultant analysis of which I am not personally familiar with so it is not
clear to me the tactics to be achieved by that consultant study.
Collins: The benefits that 1 see being achieved, Victor, would be the fact that the
EC is going to be empowered to make the decision and go out and hire somebody.
This is what I'm looking at. We can't do that. I don't care, we can do it but it's
going to be going to the Executive Board, get recommendations, have them come
back and say okay, go out and hire somebody, and we're talking two, three, four
months down the road.
JC: And that is assuming that the EC says let's hire somebody. The EC may
choose otherwise but I just need to say that so the Directors understand it. Maybe
the better way to do this, John, is to have the EC discuss it and recommend back
to the Boards.
Director (?): I support that.
JC: I'm not making that as a motion. I'm just asking John.
Collins: I would prefer that the EC, and I feel comfortable if they will go ahead and
decide to go ahead and hire somebody. I feel comfortable that they should start
right away and get the ball rolling. If we bring it back to this Board, it's another
month, 30 days down the road. More articles may be written, more accusations
may be taken. I want to get this thing resolved in the fastest way possible and if
somebody has a better way to do it and have it done faster, I'm looking for that.
Stanton: Again, Mr. Chairman, Mr. Collins, when we vote now as an entire Board
are we authorizing the EC to move forth and do that?
Collins: Yes sir.
Stanton: Okay. So it's not decided by the EC if the entire Board of Directors says
yes, let's go with an outside consultant then the EC starts that ball rolling at the
next meeting. They might decide not to do it.
Collins: That's not really the words that are in the motion.
JC: Well, let's clear it then.
Collins: I would be happy to and I thank you for your consideration. I would be
happy to say that that is the way it can be. We are authorizing the EC to get the
ball rolling to go off and interview people and start the process.
-it-
JC: So you are saying here that we are agreeing that we are going to go that way
and there will be no discussion in exec session then regarding whether we will or
will not.
Collins: Yes
JC: Alright. That's a new motion?
Collins: That's a change. If it pleases the second of that motion, I don't know
who seconded.
Director ?: It pleases the second.
JC: Alright, we have a motion and a second. Okay, discussion.
Gullixson: So what the EC is going to do is going to come up with the how. The
how to approach the issue, right?
Directors: No
JC: Now let's make sure. We have a motion that's being made. Let's make sure
we understand what it is. John, what specifically is it that you are thinking this
motion is?
Collins: I believe that now that the motion has changed ----- second change and
further changed. My motion is to direct the EC to start the process of
investigating the accusations made by The Register's article and to, if necessary,
this is what they make up, if they don't want to get a third party investigator, to
me that's okay, if they have another alternative or solution, that's fine. ---- to
respond or investigate, not respond, to investigate the accusations that were
made.
JC: Okay, we've got Debay, Ferryman, Steiner and then Vic and Carrey.
Remember that order? I hope that I do. Now, let's keep it orderly here and move
it along so we can get it done. Director Debay?
Debay: I think at some point we need to define what type of investigation we're
talking about based on experience in our own municipality. You can get up to half
a million dollars taking depositions and interviewing witnesses. I think there needs
to be a definition.
Ferryman: I also feel it needs to be a third party consultant and not someone
in-house.
-12-
JC: I have just been advised by legal counsel that due to the fact that this matter
is moving in a little different direction than just setting it on an agenda for next
exec meeting but, in fact, we are beginning to discuss and take action on
something, we had better have a four-fifth's vote to add this on as an emergency
item, assuming you can find it's an emergency item to do this this evening.
Collins: I move that
Director: Seconded
Moreno: Point of discussion
JC: Discussion
Moreno: Would you consider this an emergency item?
Directors: Discussion
JC: He has a right to ask legal counsel what legal counsel feels?
TLW: You can add an item on to the agenda if it was not, the requested action
was not prepared for and added to the agenda within 72 hours. And, Director
Collins has brought forth a whole new subject that we weren't aware of. If the
Board makes the finding that in fact it's necessary to act upon it, then it can be
added but it does require a four-fifth's vote.
JC: Alright. We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion?
Barrera: If this is not an emergency item, what would the time frame be that it
would come up under?
JC: Well, what would happen is we could agendize it for the next board meeting.
So it would be at the next board meeting, it would come up as an agendized item.
Director Stanton?
Stanton: Under discussion, Mr. Chairman, the motion is to call for a four-fifth's
vote to add this to the agenda as an emergency item that is I think within the
judgement of each one of us as to vote. For my own personal view on this, yes, it
is. I think Mr. Collins made it very clear and I think it ought to be clear to all of us
that if we want to keep seeing one article after another, getting one 20-page report
after another answering things in the paper or if you want to get down to the facts
to see if the procedures were correct or if they weren't correct and to take action
accordingly if it is necessary, then we had better get on with it and I for one will ---
-13-
JC: Alright. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Let's have a role call vote on
this if we could, Penny. Okay, let me do it this way. Is there any opposition to
the motion? Opposition adding it on as an emergency item. (Directors Winchell,
Brown, Partin, Nelson and Welch opposed by raising hands.) Motion carries adding
it on as an emergency item. Now we will proceed with our discussion. Now we
had gone with Director Debay, I think Director Steiner is next.
Steiner: I feel on this issue is that I think Director Collins is saying that the EC
could proceed and is authorized to proceed with an independent, outside
consultant to address these issues or any other measures that they desire. What
about the possibility that the EC, or a majority of the EC, would feel that the
lengthy response by the General Manager satisfactorily answers the questions that
have been raised by The Register?
JC: Well, I think we all have our subjective feelings of whether it did or not. If the
full Board decides that they want to do this other thing, I would assume as a
Director on the EC that I'll do what they direct us to do even though I may not
agree with it.
Steiner: Because I am a member of the EC, if I felt the General Manager's was
satisfactory and I so word that and a majority of the EC ---- that then that would
obviously ----
JC: No. Not the way the motion is made.
Leipzig: 1 support the idea that the EC Directors or General Manager's response
was satisfactory for my own questions. If the EC can argue before this Board -----
rationale with an outside consultant to examine our procedures, then I would be
happy to vote in favor of that. I would like to hear ----- explanation and analysis.
Welch: My only comment is I think the idea is a terrific one, to get an independent
view point in this respect. My concern is the cost or manner or type of
investigation that is to take place by the consultant and I certainly wouldn't want
our EC to go out and spend $500,000 to research these particular issues. It is my
concern, the open-ended nature of the motion as it reflects cost. I would want the
opportunity to vote on that. If the EC wants to spend $500,000 1 would like to
have the opportunity to vote against it.
Ferryman: I agree with what he just said but I think that perhaps the right
approach would be to have the EC limit the scope of work, or determine the scope
of what the investigation is going to be, both financially and the scope of work. I
do still feel that it should be a third party independent consultant.
Stanton: I agree with the concerns about the cost but I think, and again this is an
-14-
aside, a very quick aside, after reading the General Manager's report, I find I don't
know, I'd like to sit down with those who disagree and go over this line by line,
but I find that basically the memo pretty much confirms all of the figures that The
Register in terms of the cost overruns, the total costs paid. It's just put in a way
that it doesn't seem to, but if you start adding up the figures it hits right on almost
word for word in terms of the money that we actually spent. So, again, with that
as an aside, that is a major motivation why I think that we have to look at
reporting procedures, the information we receive, what's happened in the past, the
whole process of what we're spending. Cost Is an Important consideration. If you
hire an outside person, we've got to agree to that part of the motion, but it's going
to cost us some money. How much will it cost? I don't mean to be glib or flip
about this but, you know, it's not going to cost $435,000 which is what we just
paid for an Issue in legal fees that didn't even go into the court room. It went into
arbitration. And we didn't get that money back. Now, how much more of that do
we have to go through until we stop and say wait a minute. Let's get an
independent look at this. Do you want to put a limit on this of $250,000 or
$300,000, something like that? You know, John Collins would probably stop any
change orders that would adjust that but, again, I'm not being sarcastic. It's not
going to cost $435,000. But if you start adding up what we've spent because of
the allegations and charges that have been made in that Register article, you know,
whatever we spend on this is going to be a drop in the bucket compared to what is
being questioned at this District right now.
Steiner: 1 would just hope, Mr. Chairman, that when it comes to the EC that it is
really well thought out in terms of scope of work, exactly what type of objectives
we achieve and that fact that we are talking in some cases about different
persons' perceptions and approach it in a very logical way, not open-ended ----. In
fact that can be as dangerous as doing or just going off on a tangent.
Collins: It is my Intention that if it does get to the EC, and certainly they will hear
from the staff a review I suppose of pretty much what the General Manager has
told us, maybe in a little bit more detail, to help them formulate a decision. If they
cannot come to, and they certainly can't do everything at that one meeting, for
example they couldn't go out and solicit proposals and start the interview process
at that meeting, clearly. But If they came to a much different conclusion, they
certainly would have the right to bring it back to this body and ask for another
motion. If they find that action is required, that this motion that we now have in
front of us gets that ball rolling without any further delay of having this -------.
JC: Alright. What's your pleasure?
Directors: Call for the question
JC: Alright. Do you all remember what the question is? No? I didn't think you
-15-
did. Let's ask, what is the question?
Collins: I would like that read back, please.
Director: First one or second?
JC: Third one
Collins: The one that is on the floor. The one that we're considering. I have it
written out but I also have it changed.
Debay: I have a question. I'm living in a different place, maybe, than a lot of you.
I don't take The Register so I have not read, maybe it's better. I'm beginning to
wonder if we're running this Board or if The Register is?
JC: I think the unfortunate thing in this whole thing is the Orange County Register
does feel that they are going to whip-saw this Board and they have some of the
Directors very candidly. I think that we need to keep in focus, folks, what this
organization has been over the years and not all of a sudden because of
accusations, and I will strongly disagree with Director Stanton and the fact that
everything has been worn out that was in the Orange County Register, I have
spent several hours at this District with staff since this happened. I have looked at
the documents and I think it is a great aberration in the paper vs. what really
happened. So, I disagree. Director Stanton?
Stanton: Mr. Chairman, you know, I think that we've got records and haven't
even seen what the problems are that we discussed for two hours in executive
session. And we better dam well have that kind of discussion in open session here
with all 40 Directors. When we're talking about metals(?) that are joined together,
we're told it's been done for 30 years that way. And there are corrosion problems
out there. We don't know when these things happen. I have to question and
couldn't get an answer from staff. I finally had to tell the attorney to shut up and
let the engineers answer the question in the last executive board session when I
was told that they knew about this three years ago and I said you are just bringing
this to us now in 1994? You're bringing this problem to us now when it has fallen
out of warranty? Oh, well, we think we knew about it then. I think we mentioned
it to you back in 1993. 1 still haven't found where it was mentioned in 1993. So,
Mr. Chairman, when I see here Directors that don't even know what the problems
are or what is going on or haven't even read one account of it let alone two
accounts of it, and I've seen it from both sides. I've seen it in the executive
session and I've seen it in The Register, and I've read this report where The
Register is talking about a job is costing over a half-million dollars and it only starts
out at $114,000 or $135,000, but then you add all these things on and it's the
same price that we're talking about, you know, I'm really concerned that all of us
-16-
are on the same planet here as far as what these charges are. And I really resent
you saying that any Directors are whip-sawed by The Register. That's just bullshit)
JC: ---Roger, you're entitled to your opinion. I'm entitled to mine. I'm sorry that
we don't agree. Director Collins?
Collins: Would the Assistant Board Secretary find it helpful if I read the motion?
ABS: I certainly would.
Collins: I think I've got it right now, Penny. I'll give you a copy of this after the
meeting. The motion is to direct the Executive Committee to consider at its next
meeting all facts and accusations contained in The Register articles and to retain
an independent consultant to undertake value (?) engineering and investigate
issues set forth in The Register articles. The EC be authorized to solicit proposals
and I would like to add. I just want to add one more thing. The intention of the
motion, as Director Steiner has mentioned, if the EC came to a conclusion that this
was something that they shouldn't do, they should come back to this Board. If the
body of evidence presented to them is overwhelming they should not continue,
they couldn't continue anyway at the next meeting. So if that's the way they
wanted to go then they can do the scope of work and get on with the project and
be authorized to do so by this Board.
TLW: Director Collins, could I inquire? As I thought I heard it and took notes, it
seems like it was somewhat contradictory. I read your motion as being to consider
at the next meeting all facts and accusations set forth in The Register articles and
to retain an independent consultant. But then you later said and then to solicit
proposals. If you've authorized and directed the committee to, did you intend to
have the EC go out and retain because.....
Collins: Well, the EC when after they clearly come to the conclusion of reviewing
the facts and cannot go out that night and do something, I've added the solicit of
proposals as one of the first steps as going out and getting somebody. As I
understand it, Tom, we've authorized not just to retain but to start the process
going. If we don't need the statement of them authorizing solicit of proposals . . .
TLW: That isn't my concern. My concern is that I thought I heard you say to
direct the committee to consider the facts and then to, and to retain a consultant.
Two points, one: the EC can be delegated but basically all of our contracts, as you
know, come back here to the full Board for approval on whether to hire anyone
rather than to the EC. So unless you specifically want to delegate the contractual
authority to the EC there is an inconsistency. The other inconsistency was, as I
read it, it said that to direct, for the committee to retain and then follow it up after
you have retained them you are going to solicit proposals. I just that it was
-17-
inconsistent. I wanted to clarify it.
Collins: If it is the proper format to stop and to retain. . .
TLW: Or just to consider whether the consultant should be retained. . .
Collins: Here is what I'm trying to do. I'm trying to get a small body, because we
can't do it here evidently this evening, a small body of the executive board which
is representative of this Board to listen to all of the facts. I think the facts have to
be the answer. It's not a case of whether General Manager Sylvester's report was
satisfactory or unsatisfactory. The facts have to be considered and there is a
definite need in my mind to have an independent party come in, Not Directors
because we, quite frankly, aren't smart to get into it, not the staff, not the
attorneys, not anybody else that is attached to and associated with this Board. It
has to be an independent, a pure, unbiased, unquestioned party to come in and do
an analysis and present that analysis back to the Directors. Now that is what I
want to get done and if I have failed to express that, then if you could put that,
Tom, into better language to effect that, that is what I want. lend of tape)
Partin: Where do you get the facts, John? From The Register or whoever gives
the information to The Register? What facts are you talking about? The facts are
the same facts that have been thrown out and blown up in a newspaper article
because we are now involved in negotiations. Everything is bogged down. It
makes the Districts look bad, its' Board of Directors look bad. Throw every bit of
mud you can at it. The same thing is happening in my city with the police
department. It is happening in a lot of municipalities. This is nothing new. I read
those articles in The Register and trash them. As an engineer I've worked a lot of
big projects and I know that you cannot ever in your wildest dreams hope to come
in under what you budgeted for.
Collins: You asked a lot of questions. The first question is where do I get the
facts. I'm not sure. I'm not sure where the facts come from. I don't believe The
Register has 100% facts. I'm not sure that we do as well. So what I want to do
is get some independent party to come in here and say hey, we'll look at the
accusations, we'll look at the response if they don't match up or, what I think may
have happened because there are some things that I don't want to prejudge a little
bit there, that the procedures are not affective procedures. I have a concern when
the design engineer is the person who does the quality assurance part. And that is
unfair to Tom, quite frankly, and to his department. I would rather see some
procedural changes. And I believe that an independent party can come in here,
that is the kind of thing we may get. And if they deal with more budgets, I don't
know. I don't want to get that far down in front of us. But there are going to be
some good, solid, independent recommendations made from whoever we can get.
I assume we can get some independent people.
-1 B-
Partin: That may be a problem.
Collins: It may be. But let's let the EC decide that. If the EC says there is no way
we can get an independent party to do this, have them come back to us and make
that recommendation. We've done business with almost every design engineer on
the western seaboard, I assume. And it may be difficult to get a good design
engineer to come. Or maybe we can get some independent auditor to go off and
hire a design engineer or contractor or procedural person or administrator or
whatever, and come in and give us some recommendations. 1 think it's time we do
that. And I have some concerns.
JC: Let me say this. I agree with where I think you are going, John. I feel that
certainly our procedures in the past, because of the fact that we have chosen, and
I think a lot of our new directors are not aware of this but we have chosen to have
a small staff deliberately and to work through the procedures that we currently
have and that is to go out, hire consultants and other people to do our work for us.
I agree that I think maybe we need to analyze our practices and procedures and we
may find that the recommendation of someone could be maybe we ought to
change and maybe we should hire 50 engineers and do our own work. That might
be the recommendation. I don't know. And then we have to struggle with that. I
don't think that The Register article, while I disagree with a lot that's said, I still
think that it doesn't mean that we should hide our heads in the sand and say well,
just because it came out of The Register or whatever that there is nothing there. I
am fully satisfied from my investigation that there is not a total truthfulness but
that doesn't mean to say that I don't agree with looking at what our practices and
procedures are and seeing if there is a better way to do it. 20120 hindsight is
always great. We can always be critical after the fact. But, you know, we're in
the trenches. They are in the trenches. We've got to understand that. i think if
you're going in that direction where we're basically trying to look at our practices
and procedures and see if there is a better way that we can do this, I don't think
staff or anybody here will disagree with that. I think it is how are we getting there
that is the problem.
Collins: If I may, sir. I agree with what you said. I think we now have in front of
us the incidence through at lease assume that will give us a leading indicator of
where we should start looking to examine our procedures. If we do have difficulty,
and please don't get me wrong. And nobody in the audience should get me
wrong. I am not saying we do. I'm saying if we do have difficulties that at least
the accusations that have been raised seem to be significant enough that they
should be looked at and perhaps exposed so that procedural changes or staffing
changes that we should make. Just as a quick add, I would also like to challenge
the EC Directors to attend the New Directors' Orientation because I think it will be
helpful to understand the plant and its facilities.
-19-
JC: I think everybody should attend it. I think if you haven't, you're cheating
yourself. Director Stanton and then Director McGuigan.
Stanton: Mr. Chairman, I think as a result of this what you have concluded and
satisfied yourself might be a possible outcome. And in fact everybody might then
agree with you. But just for Mr. Partin's purpose, one thing if you read that article,
Mr. Woodruff, it locks like there have been certain documents obtained through
The Register through a freedom of information search. Is that true or not?
TLW: They didn't make a freedom of information search.
Stanton: They asked for documents?
TLW: Sure. The Register reporter is in the room tonight for those of you who
didn't know that. He's been over here at the Districts, I don't know, 6, 8 or 10
times. He's been on the phone. We've given him response, we've attached--
Stanton: The answer is yes. That's all I want. A yes or no. So, you know, that
little tiny _ was, why weren't we ever told that The Register reporter is over
here in our files getting documents? Why weren't we told that? And second part,
b, I'd like to see copies of the very documents that this District gave him so I can
look at it with The Register article, I'll give you a copy of that, to see if there is
match. I'd like to see those. As a matter of _, that has happened in my city, in
my county. If there is an information search, we're notified and we're given the
documents that were given to the press. As one Director, I will make that request.
TLW: We have a log, I believe, of everything that the Register reporter requested,
a copy of. He spent many hours here. He looked at, we handed over to him for
his review something on the order of 100 or 150 manilla file folders, and they
were of varying thicknesses, and he didn't make copies but looked and took his
notes so we have no record --
Stanton: He has no copies of any documents?
TLW: No, I said he requested copies and we made some copies and we have a log
of everything he has a copy of and it's no problem, I'm sure, that staff and Board
Secretary's office, we have, the District has a log of what was copied.
Stanton: May we, as Directors, get copies of those documents copied by the
reporter at the EC meeting?
TLW: Of course.
McGuigan: Mr. Chairman, I'm not sure of this. I'm not a member of the EC but
-20-
I'm not sure if I were whether I would have any idea specifically as to where you
are going to go. Mr. Collins was mentioning about changing procedures and we're
looking at something that did happen that maybe could have been misreported,
perhaps. I'm concerned as to whether or not the EC going to have specific
direction for deciding how to choreograph the proposals let alone what type of
concern or_ we would be able to respond to.
Hammond: Two points. First of all, it seems like we did call for the question and
this was supposed to be only a definition of what the question was to be.
JC: I think it's trying to clarify specifically what the words were or what the
meaning of the words was, if you will.
Hammond: Second point, my preference, and I don't know how John or anyone
else would feel about this, but would be to direct the EC to define the scope of
work, request proposals and bring those proposals back to the entire Board for final
review. This would be a substitute motion.
Seconded
JC: Alright, we have a substitute motion. Did everyone hear that? Alright,
Director Moreno.
Moreno:
JC: Okay, we have a substitute motion.
Collins: I did not hear it, Mr. Chairman.
JC: Okay, state the motion and then we'll go
Hammond: I'll do my best to get it in the same way to direct the EC to define the
scope of work, to request proposals and bring those proposals back to the entire
board for authorization.
Collins: So in other words, you are changing my motion is not referencing the
accusations made by The Register so I'm not sure what proposals or what
investigation you are talking about.
Hammond: I think the EC may want to limit it to The Register accusations or may
want to expand it somewhat depending upon other issues that might come up on
their own sight between now and then and input that other Directors may pass on
to the EC between now and then.
-21-
Welch: I think that's a real good idea. My question was going to be with regard
to the original motion whether or not it included the delegation that Tom talked
about to the EC of the authority to actually make and enter into a contract, not just
solicit bids but to enter into a contract. I was going to object to that. I prefer the
substitute motion.
Sansone: I have a second substitute motion. What is going on is water over the
damn. It has been answered by the General Manager. I suspect that from this
point, and here's the motion, that we institute and authorize an audit of our
operational and technical procedures.
Seconded
Director (?): No it isn't. I think the point he is trying to get through here is to
forget about the articles in The Register. Hire the proper consultant to come in and
review our procedures. All he has to do is take into account the articles in the
paper and the response by the General Manager and make his determination.
Ferryman: I agree. I think Director Sansone has gotten to the heart of the thing.
That's where we need to be and I think that's where everyone's concerns are. Are
we following the proper procedures and as John mentioned earlier, as far as ------
already authorized, so I agree with the substitute motion on the floor.
JC: Alright, the substitute substitute motion. Further discussion? Alright, we're
going to go for the substitute substitute motion. We all know what that is. Phil,
state it again.
Sansone: That we authorize the EC to employ an independent
investigator/consultant to perform an audit on operational and technical
procedures.
JC: Alright and that's seconded. Under discussion let's go to Debay and then
Barrera.
Debay: I'm curious by what consists of an audit. What from the staff? What are
you talking about? Are we going to look at every procedure book here? What do
you mean by audit?
Sansone: An operational audit, it is pretty well standard. We did this at the waste
management commission and they tore us apart. An independent audit. They
recommended changes on all different types of procedures and it was up to the
commission and the board to agree to it, which they did and that is what I'm
looking for here. Someone to come in independently and look at how and the way
we are doing business and say is this the best way it can be done. Can it be done
-22-
better in a different way?
Debay: How long did it take and how much did it cost?
Sansone: I don't remember, Pat McGuigan, do you remember how much?
McGuigan: I've been wracking my brains trying to think. I think it was at least
half a million dollars.
Barrera: Mr. Chairman, have we ever done and had any kind of an audit in the
past in our history as to procedures. Was there one done ---?
JWS: Not the type you are specifically talking about. The independent financial
auditor checks our internal controls and, in fact, the Board just passed an action
tonight to hire them to do an extension of that. But the type that you are talking
about, no.
Barrera: Could that be added to that particular same audit?
JC: I don't know that they are the ones that should do it, Fred.
Stanton: I would speak strongly against the substitute motion. It is a subset of
the Hammond-Collins motion. It is a smaller portion of it. You might very well end
up with looking at procedures that in fact have -- to have failed and adjust those
procedures. The other thing I object to, with all due respect sir with regard to your
motion, is you are saying that's water under the bridge. The whole issue is water
that has been under the bridge that maybe we haven't seen go by and we want to
go back and see what was happening over the last three years. I am totally
against saying we'll just close the door on the time period from now past and we
look at everything from this point on in the future, the whole point of what's being
discussed now, when you look at these incidents, when you read the Directors'
report, we're talking about past issues in terms of when we were told things,
when we weren't told things, whether we are in warranty and what happened.
The whole issue we just went through in the arbitration was passed. You can't
say that you are going to cut off and forget this. You've got to look at this. The
whole purpose, I think with John Collins' original motion and Barry's amendment
thereof.
JC: Alright, thank you. Director Gullixson, Director Collins and then Director
Sansone:
Sansone: I'd like to withdraw my motion.
JC: Alright, the motion has been withdrawn.
-23-
Gullixson: I'm in support of the substitute motion because I think it approaches
the EC and it allows them the flexibility with a broad brush to narrow the issue
itself and bring it back to the Board ------- I think the EC needs the flexibility right
off the bat and let them have the broad brush approach to bring the issue back.
JC: Alright. One last vote. We did have a hand and then we'll go to the vote.
Director Collins?
Collins: My concern is to combine both efforts here. And I understand my
concern when I made the motion to begin with was not just to come up with
better procedures, which I think would be the offshoot of doing this, but whether
we like it or not, we have accusations that have been made against us or our
position. They have to be responded to. We represent millions of people in this
county who have a right to know what our response is to those accusations. And
the accusations' response can best come, from a credibility state anyway, from an
Independent person. If you rate all of these things down and each accusation, and
even if we give our response to the Register and say that's not true, they said this,
so forth, I would rather have it come from an independent party that says here is
the accusation and here are the facts. The accusation is wrong or the accusation
has some merit and here is something that can come from a procedural change to
preclude it from happening in the future.
JC: John, let me ask you a question. I'm going to abstain, by the way, on all of
these motions because I don't think they are an emergency, but let me just say
this. Do you think that you could listen to the responses that would be given by
the staff to these particular accusations and determine whether they are right or
wrong?
Collins: Could I listen to them? Absolutely.
JC: Do you think you could understand if somebody, if you were to read a letter
that basically said something totally different than the article in the newspaper, do
you think you could read and understand that?
Collins: I would have a tough time understanding some of these issues.
JC: I think, to be honest with you, I've gone through this with the staff. I think
any of us could understand them. I do. I think any of us could understand those
Issues. Alright, that simple. I don't have a lot of expertise myself, as you know,
but nonetheless I tell you I've sat down, I've looked at the documents, I've talked
with staff, I've asked the questions and I think that you could understand where
everything truly is. And I would say that to any Director in this room. So, you
know, I don't know right now, very honestly, that we need to hire somebody to do
an investigation of every allegation in The Register. I do feel that there are maybe
-24-
some things that we ultimately may want to change. Not because it is wrong, but
it might be better. But I think I'd give yourself a chance first to listen to what the
staff has to say and to find out if, in fact, there's really any merit to all of this
stuff. And if you feel after that that there is, move on with it. Or if you feel that it
is too technical and you can't understand it, move on with it.
Collins: Mr. Chairman, you have said so often we can have a difference of opinion
and I believe we have one now. Because I don't believe, I don't have an
engineering background and some of the other backgrounds that would be required
to fully understand and comprehend all of the answers.
JC: I don't think it takes that.
Collins: Well, I do because of some of the things ---- the engines for the last year
or so and some of the other technical issues. If staff came up and said it was
blue, I would have to be totally at the mercy of staff saying trust me, I've looked
into and it's not the case.
JC: This stuff wasn't just listening to staff. This was reading documents.
Debay: I was going to ask if it would be better to schedule an additional meeting
to do just exactly what you suggested. For two years I have been sitting here
taking the advice of the EC not knowing the facts so maybe it's time you involved
all the Directors and do exactly what you just suggested.
Stanton: Mr. Chairman, with regard to a very special comment of discussion
between you and Mr. Collins, I don't think the issue is who is smart and who isn't
smart. I think the issue is independence, as called by his motion.
JC: Alright, we have a motion and a second on the floor. We're going to go with
it. Repeat the motion, the second motion. This is the substitute motion.
Hammond: Penny, do you have it written down?
ABS: The motion is to direct the EC to define the scope of work, request
proposals, and bring the proposals back to the Board for final review.
JC: Alright, we have a motion and a second for that.
Hammond: regarding the allegations that have recently been made
ABS: Excuse me and to allow the EC to limit it to The Register article or expand it,
if possible, with other input from other Directors
-25-
TLW: Scope of work to include The Register article
Hammond: Right, but not limited to
Stanton: to include but not limit to
JC: We have a motion and a second. I will abstain. The motion carries. We will
now go into closed session.
#13
JWS: Mr. Dawes, the question was if there's a problem if the contract under
item 13 was continued for 60 days?
TMD: The bids allow a 60 days from the opening. I believe the opening was
February list so a 60 days continuation, a 30 day might get us.... I'm sure the
contractor, if we ask him would give us more time also.
?: ------ direct that the contractor give us more time and otherwise ---- a 30 day.
JC: Well, ok.
Barrera: In comments, when the contractors-------
JC: Go ahead, Fred.
Barrera: I said would this ------- with this contractor the one that we just did the ---
and everything was fine.
TLW: We have used this contractor here on a number of our jobs and the jobs
from a construction point of view have always come in on time and within budget
and the quality of their work has been excellent. In terms of accidents, we have
no reported accidents from this contractor either.
JC: Further discussion?
JC: Alright, in discussing with General Counsel. Maybe two things we need; first
off is if you want to cancel or undo the prior action, we need a motion and a
second to do that. Secondarily, we need clarification of what it is specifically we
are going to do, just wait 60 days or what?
?: I think parliamentary rules are that we consider the motion that automatically ---
--- the previous motion.
-26-
TLW: Well, that is I like when you have something like this I like the record to be
as thorough and complete as possible and so the effect is of reconsideration does
that. I just want everyone is aware of what it would be doing if that is what your
intent and decision is that you effectively cancel the prior action earlier and
reinstate the item on the agenda.
Ferryman: Are we trying to achieve something within the 60 day period? Is there
going to be a closure on this other issue within the 60 days period that is going to
determine whether we are going to go forward with this contract?
JC: I don't know how to answer that.
TLW: I don't know how to answer that either. As the Chairman, I am not sure
what direction I am given or anybody else is given as to what we can come back
with.
?: The reason I said 60 days is pulling off of thin air. I thought this was an
on-going investigation and information is evolving would be provided the Districts
in this tragedy and maybe in another month or two we would have a better
comfort level as whether Pascal & Ludwig would ----- called for or not. We may
not have an answer and I guess we have to deal with it at that time. ------- a little
bit more time. I mean rather than approve a million dollar contract tonight for
something that is ......
JC: There is an alternate to that too but ... Director Hammond?
Hammond: I was just going to clarify what I thought John's motion was. I
thought his motion was simply to rescind the action, to continue with a minimum
of 30 days and discuss with the contractor the option of ------ a total of 60 days to
give us the opportunity to see what future information might come to light
regarding ----- of the contractor and the accident before we actually let him
contract again and the motion was seconded. Fred jumped in but I did second it.
JC: Ok, in discussion, Tom what would the problem be if we just didn't approve
this at all but rejected all bids? Where are we going to stand if we don't go
forward with this project? Because if we are looking at 60 days from the date the
bids were opened we have to be done before our next meeting. There has to be a
decision because by that time the 60 days will have run.
TMD: There should be no reason why you couldn't reject these bids. There is
nothing urgent on this job. It is a repair type job, fixing things up, issues like that.
It is not standing on a critical path with respect to any other work so the bids
could be rejected.
-27-
JC: Well, the thing is that the bids are good for 60 days from the date they are
opened. If they would extend it, that would be fine. But, it is either that. If we
don't, then we could reject them. The thing is the 60 days will not occur until
after, it will occur before our next Board meeting. There were opened
February 1st, I believe was the comment. March, April. They were opened on
February 1st. It will be April.
Gullixson: I withdraw my previous motion. I move that we reject all bids.
JC: Alright, we have a withdrawn. Do we have a second to the motion? Alright.
?: Does this action tonight might discredit us our Sanitation Districts with respect
to cases that might come up with regards to the accident. ----- the next bid, with
rejecting him cause some suspicion that he was not a good contractor when very
well satisfied with his work all of these years. Now we come in and say well, we
reject him because we don't really trust him now. Why did we have him on board
in the first place if we know feel that way? I don't think this is a good action if we
are trying to ----- rejecting this bid or even rejecting them all because it is going to
get out what we have done. The guy has the next job coming and we decide he
may not be as good as we thought he was so we might suffer some liability from
that viewpoint. In my opinion, I don't think it is a good thing.
Debay: I was just trying to listen to the reverse side of the coin as it turns out that
we are responsible and now no contractor will work for us. I don't know what we
are trying to accomplish by this.
JC: Director Collins, Stanton and Barrera.
Collins: As I understand it, the basis for refusing the acceptance of the bids is
getting them all back. The fact that they had, this company has an OSHA site
against them.
TLW: I would strongly urge and recommend that you do not make such a finding
because a) we do not have the OSHA findings b) that is not basis upon which you
would want to reject it. We have in the notice of inviting bids the absolute
discretion to reject all bids without cause if you want to make it. If you want to
reject them that would be to way to do it because otherwise you would make a
prejudicial finding for which we really have facts to support it.
Collins: That is my point because this is certainly not a criteria of selecting people
so turning them all back for basically no reason kind of concerns me.
Directors: Me too.
-28-
Stanton: Mr. Chairman, sir, may I get clarification on what I thought Mr. Dawes
said and if I am wrong I will admit error in hearing. I thought Mr. Dawes said we
could go 30 days and during that time discuss with the contractor if he would be
willing to agree to a further delay?
TMD: I said that; I am thinking now; I may be a few days off because the Board
meeting is (Tape ended)
Stanton: Thank you, sir, I did hear and .......
JC: Director Barrera and then Director Gullixson.
Barrera: There were two people killed and probably until we find out what
happened I think we should hold this thing up. This may be a great contractor but
something went wrong that is very serious.
Gullixson: The reason for bringing the motion to ----- I had a little concern with
whether the subcontractor or we willing to take the steps necessary to insure a
safe place to work and are we having appropriate safety meetings and safety
supervisor in inherently dangerous situations involved. I think in 30 days we can
ask those questions, have staff come back so we can feel that things are being
looked at from that safety perspective because essentially what Mr. Spradlin said
was that we are exposed to liability in these situations when reasonable call for
certain safety measures and we have to take them. The question is whether or
not we protected ourselves by putting in writing, factually I think there is some
other exposure but since this is not a contract that is required to be done right now
and since we don't have to ----, I think we should review the questions about
safety, 30 and 60 days to ask reasonable questions before we award the contract.
Leipzig: Has any of the work to be done by this contractor ----------- working in
close spaces?
TMD: Not certain right now. Almost all of our contracts we have to go into
confined spaces.
JC: I believe that, correct me if I am wrong, that Dan said that they had been
working in that ditch 3 or 4 times and at one time they did have monitoring
equipment in there and decided they didn't need it anymore and this time they
didn't have it. I believe that is what he said.
Saltarelli: I agree with Director Gullixson. I think his last comment hit it right on
the head. It is not that we are taking any action on any particular contractor at
this time. Because this job was a very serious accident as Mr. Barrera said , I think
30 days to review our procedures and things like that certainly make alot of sense.
-29-
I think the motion should be based on as Director Gullixson just said.
JC: So the concern then so I can understand it is, your concern is not so much as
going forward with the contractor but it is concern that do we have a safe working
environment?
Gullixson: Safe work environment and have we documented the safety
requirements necessary to eliminate our liability if someone is hurt on the
workplace who is employed by the subcontractor.
JC: Director Partin and then McGuigan.
Partin: I think this is a very dangerous time in possible future litigation coming up
about this to be doing anything with respect to investigation our in-house safety
precautions and procedures. It may need to be done but I don't think that this
very moment we should be broaching that subject.
McGuigan: The motion as I understand it is to reject all bids?
JC: That is the motion.
JC: Let me just say another point was just raised by General Counsel and that is
that if time 30, 60 or whatever days would make a difference what could happen
now is Tom could talk to them and see if they would be willing to continue this
matter for a period of months at their agreement and if in fact.., excuse me.
Stanton: I'm sorry, sir.
JC: Excuse me, I am sure what you have to say is more important than what I
have to say.
Stanton: That is what Dawes said before.
JC: But again it has been pointed out that if in fact the contractor does not wish
to continue this matter to a time that we feel would be reasonable that is going to
lapsed any way after 60 days. We could do that and if in fact that happens then
there is nothing that we have accepted. We have to go back out for bids again so
we can do it either way but again I bring it up only because it just suggested to
me. I think either way it goes, it would work. The motion on the floor currently is
to reject all bids.
TLW: If I could add one point that I know has been raised by Directors before. By
rejecting all bids means that we would have to go back and republish and incur
those costs. Second thing is this bid came in $300,000 below estimate so it is a
-30-
very attractive bid for the benefit of the Districts. I was suggesting that if you
want the time and I think that makes good sense to take the 30 or 60 days to get
the investigation. If you simply don't act on it and if Pascal & Ludwig doesn't
agree to extending the award by 60 days then he lost the bid anyway and we
won't have the bid to anybody. We will be back and we will go out for new bids.
If he does agree to it and within 60 days the Boards determine we will or we won't
award it to them, you preserve the option of at least of preserving a good bid as
well as having your investigation.
Debay: May I ask the engineers or technical people here if they are concerned
about this company?
TMD: This company has had a 5 or 6 jobs with us over the last several years;
mostly smaller jobs under $1 million and I have never heard from our people that
they are unsafe, notwithstanding the terrible accident that took place but I haven't
heard any reports of that.
Gullixson: It is not a question of whether they are unsafe, it is a question of
whether we are unsafe to the point that we pose ourselves liability. I withdraw my
motion and move that we continue, if you think we can get away with that ----------
(very loud cough that wiped it out) and award it within 60 days anyway.
JC: Alright, we have a new motion. Any discussion? We have a second. Any
discussion? Any opposition to the motion? Alright, thank you.
-31-
03/09/94 JOINT BOARD MEETING
#3 - Appointment of Chairman pro tern
District 3 - Director Wally Linn was appointed Chairman pro tem for District 3 due
to Chairman and Chairman pro tem being absent.
#5 - Public Comments
JC: 1 have two people who have indicated a willingness to speak. The first is
Ellen Ray and then David L. Hamilton. Customary time limit is five minutes.
Ellen Ray: I am on the employees' bargaining committee for the Operations and
Maintenance Employees. I would like to ask that you read and consider the packet
given to you tonight by the negotiating committee. If you haven't received this
packet, one of your employees, Joe Park, has one in the corner there for you.
We have been negotiating in good faith since September 14, 1993. From the start
we were told there was no Districts' money available for anything. We accepted
this as truth. Then we were told there was some money but it is only for those
employees who work a 12-hour shift. Something is wrong here, folks. We want
to reach an agreement with the Districts and we ask your support in achieving this
goal. Thank you very much.
David L. Hamilton: Good evening everybody. I hope this is the last time I am
going to have to be here this year. I hate to waste your valuable time but there is
a necessity for it and that's why I'm here.
We, like some of you, are skeptical to the amount of information you receive. We
read in the newspapers like everybody else. This is very, very important to us.
This could be our livelihood for quite a while here. I say our because I represent to
your people here. We want to make sure that you see what our last proposal is
because we've been told that this proposal can't come back to the Board and a
few of the people that make the decision, we believe it should come back to you.
We're not very far apart monetarily. You can afford where we are at, I am sure.
We've looked at your budget and there is nothing that separates us from coming to
an agreement as far as the monetary issues are concerned. We are very, very
close folks. We don't need to argue over pennies. Most of our issues are not
really cost issues. They are issues of very much importance to us but they don't
cost you anything. We understand the political motivation of this Board but I think
it's time for you to stop and put politics aside and say, "these are your people.
These are what they deserve. The hell with politics. These are people that work
hard for a living. They do a damn good job and they should be rewarded thusly".
-1-
r
Look at this proposal carefully and give us a response that we know is from you.
We want to know what your response. Give us that indication. Remember, these
people do work hard, are very competent and they are your employees and your
constituents. 1 will be available if anyone has any questions later or if you have
now, please don't be afraid to ask.
#6(a) - Joint Chairman's Report
JC: This evening we are going to present some plaques and resolutions to retiring
Directors. As you know, several of our Directors recently retired from the Boards
and we would like to acknowledge their efforts with the presentation of a plaque
and a resolution expressing the Boards' appreciation for their outstanding service.
Over the years these Directors have not only performed their duty as City Council
or Sanitary District members with a high degree of professionalism and dedication,
but they have also been equally involved in the wastewater management program
and the Sanitation Districts.
I would like Bob Bell, I think Bob was not going to be here but Barry, I think you
were going to take Bob's plaque.
Jim Evans (JC presented resolution; VJC presented plaque). Mr. Evans stated it
was a pleasure working with the Districts.
Jim Silva (JC presented resolution; VJC presented plaque). Mr. Silva thanked the
staff. Also thanked the elected body and working with them.
JC: I don't believe that Director Eva Miner, Gail Kerry, Maria Moreno, Rob
Richardson or Hank Wedaa are here. We'll make presentations to them later.
Upcoming Meetings:
Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, March 16th, at
5:30 p.m.
The Executive Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, March 23rd,
at 5:30 p.m. I would like to ask Jan Debay and Barry Denes to be there.
Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers is scheduled to meet
on Wednesday, March 30th at 5:30 p.m.
#6(b) - Report of the General Manaaer
JWS: As you know, we are having a New Directors' Orientation and Treatment
Plant Tour. It has been scheduled for Saturday, March 19th from 9:00 a.m. to
-2-
1:30 p.m. We have sent information to all of you and a form. Those of you who
have not yet returned the RSVP form, we put another copy in your folders tonight.
So that we could do the proper planning, I would appreciate it if you could
complete this form and either leave it in your folder or with the clerk this evening.
Some of you who may have a conflict, we'll try to schedule maybe a follow-up
orientation and tour in a month or so. This is called a New Directors' Orientation
and Tour but all Directors are encouraged to attend. That completes my report.
#6(c) - Report of the General Counsel
TLW: There is just one item. There is a supplemental agenda item for District
No. 1. The District received a Summons and Complaint today and I think the
Chairman is going to add that to the agenda just prior to going into closed session.
Other than that I have no report.
#9d - Consent Calendar
JC: I would just like to point out for the record that as the agenda was written
there was a mistake on Item 901(2), the resolution number in the agenda should be
94-35-6. It was correct in your packet but just so that you understand if you
notice the discrepancy on that item. Is there anyone that would like to remove any
items from the Consent Calendar?
Director John Collins: Mr. Chairman, item #9d, please. We are being asked to
approve four new vehicles, one of them going to the motor pool, one going to
operations, one going to planning and design and one going to construction
management. I would like to move the two vehicles, the motor pool vehicle and
operations vehicle, and hold back on the other two vehicles. I find no
substantiation for these vehicles. I have no complaint on the prices involved. I
think they are good prices. I met with the Department Head that these vehicles
are to be assigned to and I still do not have a clear substantiation, cost-effective or
use of those vehicles so I would like to ask that they be removed and those two
vehicles come back with a better description to the Directors. I think at this time
we're spending a lot of money on things we ought to be very careful that we know
exactly where it's going. If it is appropriate at this time I would like to move the
passage of Item 9(d) to include only the two vehicles going to the motor pool and
operations.
Second.
Director Pickier: Does that affect the price of the two vehicles?
JWS: These are purchased under the State procurement contract. The only
reason it might be affected is if there is a deadline that we can't meet if we bring
-3-
them back at a later date. It is a per vehicle price, however.
TMD: The vehicle for the planning and design would be a third vehicle in that
group. There are 24 people in the group and they share two vehicles now. When
they don't have these, they go to the motor pool and get some out. This would
add a third vehicle.
The vehicle for the construction management would be used by the supervisors in
Construction Management. There was a pick-up truck that I found after 1 talked
with Director Collins that was given to the guards and that is what it is really
replacing.
Director Moreno: Are the vehicles really needed?
TMD: We've had an orderly program to replace vehicles to try to keep good
vehicles needed, but we can certainly wait.
Stanton: I would like to ask what our policy is as far as personal use of these
cars. Are any of your employees taking cars home?
TMD: Yes. In the Construction Management group there is probably four or five
supervisors who take the vehicles home. In the design group there is one
supervisor that takes a vehicle home.
Stanton: At some point, consider it a request, I would like to see a list of how
many people are allowed to take Districts' vehicles home and also I understand
from some preliminary questions that were asked by some of my staff that you
need some of these to just go from plant to plant or drive around the plant?
TMD: We use them for, the people who get the vehicles such as these are those
who go out of the plant or go between plants. The inspectors and people within
the plant use electric golf carts or bikes.
Rice: You said that if they need a car and over the two that they go to the car
pool and get one. How many cars do you have in the car pool?
TMD: I don't know that. Mr. Hodges would know.
EH: The question is how many cars do we have in the motor pool?
Rice: Yes
EH: We have approximately six sedans, three or four pick-ups and
-4-
Ferryman: Does the District have a policy where all departments as far as who
gets to take the car home or is it a haphazard thing from department to
department?
JWS: Our policy is that those people who are most likely to be called back for an
emergency are those that are assigned a vehicle that they can take home.
Lutz: Is there a policy or are people using their own car and being reimbursed for
their mileage?
TMD: Yes, they are being reimbursed.
Lutz: Is that a norm or is the norm to get a Districts car?
TMD: We want them to take a Sanitation Districts car if one is available and only
use their own car if nothing is available.
Lutz: And, the reason being?
TMD: I think it is insurance.
Stanton: Is either one or the other or both of these two cars that are excluded by
Director Collins motion in that category of cars that might be taken home used for
personal use?
TMD: Yes, one of them would replace the Construction Managers car and he
would be giving his to someone else and he would drive that home.
Barrera: Regarding sedans - having to use pickups and I would also like to know
call back for emergency. How many times a month does that happen; how often
do these emergencies happen where they have to come back here that would
demand a car?
JWS: I don't have those numbers with me. Perhaps one of the department heads
could speak for their own department.
Barrera: A report?
JWS: We could do that.
Debay: Two questions - if these two cars are deleted, would this affect our
performance at all and the second question is, you mentioned insurance? Does
this place us at any risk to use a personal car? Are we risking something?
-5-
TMD: If the cars are deleted we can continue throughout Engineering. I can't
answer the insurance question.
TLW: Maybe I can comment on that. I think the Directors may know the Districts
are entirely self-insured. We have no liability insurance and that is based on a
policy of valuation that has been made and in place for a number of years. We
have a very substantial contingency reserved money for liability and it has proven
to be very economically beneficial to the Districts to do.
The policy is generally to discourage individuals from using their own car for two
reasons. One, if the Individual uses his own car, he really has an obligation to
personally report it to his insurance company that his car will now be used for
business purposes and therefore his policy will be re-rated from personal use to
business use. His premium will go up so the Districts would be faced with either
forcing the individual to absorb a cost (which is really a Districts cost) or to
reimburse that individual. Secondly, you have a liability question when the
individual is using his car, whether his insurance should be called upon to respond
in damages or whether the Districts have to step in and leads to a legal tussle as to
who should be at fault primarily to answer to any such complaint so the policy has
been to really very very narrowly limit the use of the private vehicles.
Pickier: I guess in looking at these four. The first two are to replace and I read the
last two as additional. I don't think they have given us a good reason of why they
need two additional now. If they were replacing, I can understand. I think Collins
has a valid point that they come back and give us some good reasons for needing
the additional vehicles or they are replacing some vehicles, I think we should know
that.
Gullixson: Is there any reason why we shouldn't wait for the report to place an
order for all four? If we decide to do it eventually, do it all at once?
Hodges: The state contract for sedans - the drop dead date for purchasing these
vehicles is March 15 or 17. If we waited a month we would miss that window of
opportunity. We did go out and make sure that the prices are an acceptable price.
We did go out and solicit some bids from the private Industry and found that on
the average the costs of these sedans was around $1,800 - $2,000 a piece higher
for an equivalent sedan.
JC: Further discussion? We have a motion and a second on the floor.
Call for the question.
JC: Any opposition to the motion? Motion passes - unanimous consent.
-6-
#11 - Summary Financial Reoort
Hart: On the first page under "Other Reserves". Is that ------ individual Districts ---
-----?
GGS: There was a white staff report that accompanied this article. There is a
summary on the front and then the individual financial statements are attached to
that. The question is, as I understand it, is on the first page, the numbers that
have come from the budget document that was approved approximately a year
ago. All of those reserves, the construction reserves and the other reserves are
held in the individual Districts. None of those reserves are held in any joint reserve
or in any place like that. Those are appropriated for various things - debt service,
operating requirements, dry period requirements, insurance, things of that sort.
#12(b) - KPMG and "Bin Six"
JC: Director Stanton will be reflected as an abstention.
#13 - Job Nos. P1-48: P2-47-2: P2-56 and P2-53-2
TMD: This project is a combination of four smaller projects and includes various
repairs of equipment and replacement of older equipment in plants. It includes
safety items such as installing new handrails around the plants and as the Directors
are aware, you have authorized an extensive seismic rehabilitation program and it
includes two buildings at Plant No. 2, seismic strengthening of those buildings.
On February 1st we received four bids for this project ranging from the low
submitted by Pascal and Ludwig of $1,003,899.00 to a high of $1,774,430.00.
The recommended action is to approve two addenda which changed the bid date
and clarified a miscellaneous issues and to award to low bidder, Pascal and Ludwig
in the amount of $1,003,899.00.
Barrera: Has this contractor done work for us before?
TMD: Yes, this contractor has worked for us and is working for us presently.
(Tape Ended)
#16 - Supplemental Agenda
JC: I think what I will do is I will advance the item that we had which was a
supplemental item this evening for District No. 1 before we go into closed session.
TLW: The item for District No. 1 is the district had a construction project about a
-7-
year for a pipeline project known as the Memory Lane Interceptor. It was a joint
project between the City of Orange, City of Santa Ana and the Districts. During
the course of excavation there was some ----- as the result of some storms last
winter. The complaint is for some property damage. It is not a significant dollar
amount. We have an indemnity provision with the general contractor, Mladen
Buntich. In addition, since we had this claim in we negotiated as part of the final
closeout agreement a supplemental indemnification with the contractor. While we
do have to appear and defend the Districts we will probably succeed immediately
and have the contractors insurance company take over the defense at no cost to
the Districts.
I think we passed over item 16(a). In order to take the action as set forth in 16(b)
in the Supplemental, we first need a motion to add it to the agenda. This was just
received today and we only have 30 days in which to file the answer in Superior
Court.
JC: Deemed approved. Now we will go for the recommended action.
McGuigan: Has this work been completed so it will not delay this completion for
the whole project?
TLW: Where this location is done, this job has been done in this area for six
months.
Barrera: Being in the City of Orange, I would like to know what the damages will
be and what it was?
TLW: The location is at the corner of Parker and La Veta and there was an
excavation adjacent to the freeway underpass and at the time of the excavation
the contractor struck a water line that was owned by the City of Orange. It was
not known at the time and apparently it caused some subsidence. Then there was
an open trench, a fairly trench, this pipe was 34 to 36 feet deep. He had a "glory
hole" there. The storms came and flooded it and didn't realize there was a crack in
the water line.
It resulted in the adjacent condominium that is an apartment condominium project
and they claimed that some of their patio slabs have sunk and the patio walls
cracked. The complaint is very unique; it talks about a 1/16 inch crack in the
walls. We tried immediately and the contractor tried immediately to just walk it.
In fact, the contractor did enter the site and did make repairs on several patio slabs
directly adjacent to Parker Street. This is a follow-up to that and Mladen Buntich
has assumed the role of picking up.
Barrera: Attorneys ??
-B-
TLW: I really can't be sure. I think he was going back several months ago when
the claims came in. As I recall, it seems that we had some conversations; not me
personally but someone from my office.
JC: Deemed approved.
#14 - Closed Session
TLW: The purpose of the closed session is for two reasons. One, the District
management representatives wish to review the status of labor negotiations
between the Districts employee groups and the Directors. Secondly, the Districts
has reason to believe that there is a potential for a claim to be filed against the
Districts as a result of an accident at the Treatment Plant No. 2.
Stanton: I just want it real clear before we adjourn for the closed session that we
are not going to be engaged in any discussion of whether newspaper reports are or
are not correct. As far as I'm concerned any discussion of that nature should be
done in full public session.
JC: You are correct. They will not be discussed. However, there would be two
of them probably that would have to be discussed in closed session that involve
litigation if we were to talk about them. The only thing we are going into closed
session now for are these two matters.
Stanton: I am just registering my own personal objection. If we are in closed
session and we get into those things which I think, as one individual, everyone else
can speak for themselves, should be discussed in open session.
JC: Fine. No disagreement. Director Collins?
Collins: Mr. Chairman, I had spoken to you previous to this meeting about a
motion that I would like to make regarding this. Since we are not going to be
discussing this item in closed session, would it be appropriate to make this
motion?
JC: You can do it now.
Collins: I would like to make a motion that the Boards direct the Executive
Committee (EC) to consider at its next meeting whether to retain an independent
consultant to undertake value engineering and investigate the issues set out in the
Register newspaper article. If the EC approves the hiring of a consultant that they
(the EC) be authorized to solicit proposals from that consultant.
JC: Why don't we go ahead and set it on the agenda, John and move at that? By
-9-
the order of the Chair, it will be set on the agenda?
Collins: I would like to make it a motion that will take the onus off of you, Bill.
JC: I don't have any onus. Fine, we have a motion and a second.
Stanton: Maker of the motion, I would strongly support that motion if it is very
clear that the consultant is reporting to the Directors and not to the staff or Legal
Counsel.
Collins: Yes, that would be my idea. I think the words do so say.
JC: I think, John, what you are saying is it is to be discussed in the EC in regards
to this and we are not going to necessarily, you can certainly, Director Stanton,
speak your mind at the EC, but nonetheless I think the motion is let's discuss it
and decide if we are going to do it and if so, then the second part was that we
would be authorized to go ahead and proceed with an RFP.
Collins: The EC would be pre-authorized if they so decided to go ahead and start
interviewing the consultant because I don't want to delay here and wait for
another meeting, have to come back before us and then we go back to them.
Perhaps it would be the pleasure of the EC to even form a further subcommittee
from its members to go out and interview these people to make it happen fast. I
think it is in the best service of all the Directors, employees and staff as well as the
constituents to get this matter resolved in a very timely and equitable fashion.
JC: Agreed. Director Stanton?
Stanton: Mr. Chairman, if you could just clarify for me. It is my understanding the
motion as to whether we should or should not embark on this is to, and that issue
is to be decided by this entire board, did I misunderstand you sir that the EC would
be deciding that?
JC: I believe the motion was that the EC would discuss whether or not we would
do it and if, in fact, they decided that it would be done that they would have the
authorization to go out for an RFP. Isn't that what you said, John?
Collins: I feel comfortable, Mr. Stanton, that the EC can make that decision. I feel
comfortable with that.
JC: Alright, we're in discussion. Director Moreno?
Moreno: I think all of us should make that decision ------
-10-
Leipzig: I would appreciate that coming back to the Boards, the full Boards as
well. I would like to hear the rationale, the value of the engineering study, the
type of consultant analysis of which I am not personally familiar with so it is not
clear to me the tactics to be achieved by that consultant study.
Collins: The benefits that I see being achieved, Victor, would be the fact that the
EC is going to be empowered to make the decision and go out and hire somebody.
This is what I'm looking at. We can't do that. I don't care, we can do it but it's
going to be going to the Executive Board, get recommendations, have them come
back and say okay, go out and hire somebody, and we're talking two, three, four
months down the road.
JC: And that is assuming that the EC says let's hire somebody. The EC may
choose otherwise but I just need to say that so the Directors understand it. Maybe
the better way to do this, John, is to have the EC discuss it and recommend back
to the Boards.
Director 1?): I support that.
JC: I'm not making that as a motion. I'm just asking John.
Collins: 1 would prefer that the EC, and I feel comfortable if they will go ahead and
decide to go ahead and hire somebody. I feel comfortable that they should start
right away and get the ball rolling. If we bring it back to this Board, it's another
month, 30 days down the road. More articles may be written, more accusations
may be taken. I want to get this thing resolved in the fastest way possible and if
somebody has a better way to do it and have it done faster, I'm looking for that.
Stanton: Again, Mr. Chairman, Mr. Collins, when we vote now as an entire Board
are we authorizing the EC to move forth and do that?
Collins: Yes sir.
Stanton: Okay. So it's not decided by the EC if the entire Board of Directors says
yes, let's go with an outside consultant then the EC starts that ball rolling at the
next meeting. They might decide not to do it.
Collins: That's not really the words that are in the motion.
JC: Well, let's clear it then.
Collins: I would be happy to and I thank you for your consideration. I would be
happy to say that that is the way it can be. We are authorizing the EC to get the
ball rolling to go off and interview people and start the process.
-11-
JC: So you are saying here that we are agreeing that we are going to go that way
and there will be no discussion in exec session then regarding whether we will or
will not.
Collins: Yes
JC: Alright. That's a new motion?
Collins: That's a change. If it pleases the second of that motion, I don't know
who seconded.
Director ?: It pleases the second.
JC: Alright, we have a motion and a second. Okay, discussion.
Gullixson: So what the EC is going to do is going to come up with the how. The
how to approach the issue, right?
Directors: No
JC: Now let's make sure. We have a motion that's being made. Let's make sure
we understand what it is. John, what specifically is it that you are thinking this
motion is?
�j Collins: I believe that now that the motion has changed ----- second change and
!, further changed. My motion is to direct the EC to start the process of
investigating the accusations made by The Register's article and to, if necessary,
this is what they make up, if they don't want to get a third party investigator, to
me that's okay, if they have another alternative or solution, that's fine. ---- to
respond or Investigate, not respond, to investigate the accusations that were
made.
JC: Okay, we've got Debay, Ferryman, Steiner and then Vic and Carney.
Remember that order? I hope that I do. Now, let's keep it orderly here and move
it along so we can get it done. Director Debay?
Debay: I think at some point we need to define what type of investigation we're
talking about based on experience in our own municipality. You can get up to half
a million dollars taking depositions and interviewing witnesses. I think there needs
to be a definition.
Ferryman: I also feel it needs to be a third party consultant and not someone
in-house.
-12-
JC: I have just been advised by legal counsel that due to the fact that this matter
is moving in a little different direction than just setting it on an agenda for next
exec meeting but, in fact, we are beginning to discuss and take action on
something, we had better have a four-fifth's vote to add this on as an emergency
item, assuming you can find it's an emergency item to do this this evening.
Collins: I move that
Director: Seconded
Moreno: Point of discussion
JC: Discussion
Moreno: Would you consider this an emergency item?
Directors: Discussion
JC: He has a right to ask legal counsel what legal counsel feels?
TLW: You can add an item on to the agenda if it was not, the requested action
was not prepared for and added to the agenda within 72 hours. And, Director
Collins has brought forth a whole new subject that we weren't aware of. If the
Board makes the finding that in fact it's necessary to act upon it, then it can be
added but it does require a four-fifth's vote.
JC: Alright. We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion?
Barrera: If this is not an emergency item, what would the time frame be that it
would come up under?
JC: Well, what would happen is we could agendize it for the next board meeting.
So it would be at the next board meeting, it would come up as an agendized item.
Director Stanton?
Stanton: Under discussion, Mr. Chairman, the motion is to call for a four-fifth's
vote to add this to the agenda as an emergency item that is I think within the
judgement of each one of us as to vote. For my own personal view on this, yes, it
is. I think Mr. Collins made it very clear and I think it ought to be clear to all of us
that if we want to keep seeing one article after another, getting one 20-page report
after another answering things in the paper or if you want to get down to the facts
to see if the procedures were correct or if they weren't correct and to take action
accordingly if it is necessary, then we had better get on with it and I for one will ---
-13-
JC: Alright. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Let's have a role call vote on
this if we could, Penny. Okay, let me do it this way. Is there any opposition to
the motion? Opposition adding it on as an emergency item. (Directors Winchell,
Brown, Partin, Nelson and Welch opposed by raising hands.) Motion carries adding
it on as an emergency item. Now we will proceed with our discussion. Now we
had gone with Director Debay, I think Director Steiner is next.
Steiner: I feel on this issue is that I think Director Collins is saying that the EC
could proceed and is authorized to proceed with an independent, outside
consultant to address these issues or any other measures that they desire. What
about the possibility that the EC, or a majority of the EC, would feel that the
lengthy response by the General Manager satisfactorily answers the questions that
have been raised by The Register?
JC: Well, I think we all have our subjective feelings of whether it did or not. If the
full Board decides that they want to do this other thing, I would assume as a
Director on the EC that I'll do what they direct us to do even though I may not
agree with it.
Steiner: Because I am a member of the EC, if I felt the General Manager's was
satisfactory and I so word that and a majority of the EC ---- that then that would
obviously ----
JC: No. Not the way the motion is made.
Leipzig: I support the idea that the EC Directors or General Manager's response
was satisfactory for my own questions. If the EC can argue before this Board -----
rationale with an outside consultant to examine our procedures, then I would be
happy to vote in favor of that. I would like to hear ----- explanation and analysis.
Welch: My only comment is I think the idea is a terrific one, to get an independent
view point in this respect. My concern is the cost or manner or type of
investigation that is to take place by the consultant and I certainly wouldn't want
our EC to go out and spend $500,000 to research these particular issues. It is my
concern, the open-ended nature of the motion as it reflects cost. I would want the
opportunity to vote on that. If the EC wants to spend $500,000 1 would like to
have the opportunity to vote against it.
Ferryman: I agree with what he just said but I think that perhaps the right
approach would be to have the EC limit the scope of work, or determine the scope
of what the investigation is going to be, both financially and the scope of work. I
do still feel that it should be a third party independent consultant.
Stanton: I agree with the concerns about the cost but I think, and again this is an
-14-
aside, a very quick aside, after reading the General Manager's report, I find I don't
know, I'd like to sit down with those who disagree and go over this line by line,
but I find that basically the memo pretty much confirms all of the figures that The
Register in terms of the cost overruns, the total costs paid. It's just put in a way
that it doesn't seem to, but if you start adding up the figures it hits right on almost
word for word in terms of the money that we actually spent. So, again, with that
as an aside, that is a major motivation why I think that we have to look at
reporting procedures, the information we receive, what's happened in the past, the
whole process of what we're spending. Cost is an important consideration. If you
hire an outside person, we've got to agree to that part of the motion, but it's going
to cost us some money. How much will it cost? I don't mean to be glib or flip
about this but, you know, it's not going to cost $435,000 which is what we just
paid for an Issue in legal fees that didn't even go into the court room. It went into
arbitration. And we didn't get that money back. Now, how much more of that do
we have to go through until we stop and say wait a minute. Let's get an
independent look at this. Do you want to put a limit on this of $250,000 or
$300,000, something like that? You know, John Collins would probably stop any
change orders that would adjust that but, again, I'm not being sarcastic. It's not
going to cost $435,000. But if you start adding up what we've spent because of
the allegations and charges that have been made in that Register article, you know,
whatever we spend on this is going to be a drop in the bucket compared to what is
being questioned at this District right now.
Steiner: I would just hope, Mr. Chairman, that when it comes to the EC that it is
really well thought out in terms of scope of work, exactly what type of objectives
we achieve and that fact that we are talking in some cases about different
persons' perceptions and approach it in a very logical way, not open-ended ----- In
fact that can be as dangerous as doing or just going off on a tangent.
Collins: It is my intention that if it does get to the EC, and certainly they will hear
from the staff a review I suppose of pretty much what the General Manager has
told us, maybe in a little bit more detail, to help them formulate a decision. If they
cannot come to, and they certainly can't do everything at that one meeting, for
example they couldn't go out and solicit proposals and start the interview process
at that meeting, clearly. But if they came to a much different conclusion, they
certainly would have the right to bring it back to this body and ask for another
motion. If they find that action is required, that this motion that we now have in
front of us gets that ball rolling without any further delay of having this -------.
JC: Alright. What's your pleasure?
Directors: Call for the question
JC: Alright. Do you all remember what the question is? No? I didn't think you
-15-
did. Let's ask, what is the question?
Collins: I would like that read back, please.
Director: First one or second? -
JC: Third one
Collins: The one that is on the floor. The one that we're considering. I have it
written out but I also have it changed.
Debay: I have a question. I'm living in a different place, maybe, than a lot of you.
I don't take The Register so I have not read, maybe it's better. I'm beginning to
wonder if we're running this Board or if The Register is?
JC: I think the unfortunate thing in this whole thing is the Orange County Register
does feel that they are going to whip-saw this Board and they have some of the
Directors very candidly. I think that we need to keep in focus, folks, what this
organization has been over the years and not all of a sudden because of
accusations, and I will strongly disagree with Director Stanton and the fact that
everything has been worn out that was in the Orange County Register, I have
spent several hours at this District with staff since this happened. I have looked at
the documents and I think it is a great aberration in the paper vs. what really
happened. So, I disagree. Director Stanton?
Stanton: Mr. Chairman, you know, I think that we've got records and haven't
even seen what the problems are that we discussed for two hours in executive
session. And we better dam well have that kind of discussion in open session here
with all 40 Directors. When we're talking about metals(?) that are joined together,
we're told it's been done for 30 years that way. And there are corrosion problems
out there. We don't know when these things happen. I have to question and
couldn't get an answer from staff. I finally had to tell the attorney to shut up and
let the engineers answer the question in the last executive board session when I
was told that they knew about this three years ago and I said you are just bringing
this to us now in 1994? You're bringing this problem to us now when it has fallen
out of warranty? Oh, well, we think we knew about it then. I think we mentioned
it to you back in 1993. 1 still haven't found where it was mentioned in 1993. So,
Mr. Chairman, when I see here Directors that don't even know what the problems
are or what is going on or haven't even read one account of it let alone two
accounts of it, and I've seen it from both sides. I've seen it in the executive
session and I've seen it in The Register, and I've read this report where The
Register is talking about a job is costing over a half-million dollars and it only starts
out at $114,000 or $135,000, but then you add all these things on and it's the
same price that we're talking about, you know, I'm really concerned that all of us
-16-
are on the same planet here as far as what these charges are. And I really resent
you saying that any Directors are whip-sawed by The Register. That's just bullshit!
JC: ---Roger, you're entitled to your opinion. I'm entitled to mine. I'm sorry that
we don't agree. Director Collins?
Collins: Would the Assistant Board Secretary find it helpful if I read the motion?
ABS: I certainly would.
Collins: I think I've got it right now, Penny. I'll give you a copy of this after the
meeting. The motion is to direct the Executive Committee to consider at its next
meeting all facts and accusations contained in The Register articles and to retain
an independent consultant to undertake value (?) engineering and investigate
issues set forth in The Register articles. The EC be authorized to solicit proposals
and I would like to add. I just want to add one more thing. The intention of the
motion, as Director Steiner has mentioned, if the EC came to a conclusion that this
was something that they shouldn't do, they should come back to this Board. If the
body of evidence presented to them is overwhelming they should not continue,
they couldn't continue anyway at the next meeting. So if that's the way they
wanted to go then they can do the scope of work and get on with the project and
be authorized to do so by this Board.
TLW: Director Collins, could I inquire? As I thought I heard it and took notes, it
seems like it was somewhat contradictory. I read your motion as being to consider
at the next meeting all facts and accusations set forth in The Register articles and
to retain an independent consultant. But then you later said and then to solicit
_ proposals. If you've authorized and directed the committee to, did you intend to
have the EC go out and retain because.....
Collins: Well, the EC when after they clearly come to the conclusion of reviewing
the facts and cannot go out that night and do something, I've added the solicit of
4 proposals as one of the first steps as going out and getting somebody. As I
understand it, Tom, we've authorized not just to retain but to start the process
going. If we don't need the statement of them authorizing solicit of proposals . . .
TLW: That isn't my concern. My concern is that I thought I heard you say to
direct the committee to consider the facts and then to, and to retain a consultant.
Two points, one: the EC can be delegated but basically all of our contracts, as you
know, come back here to the full Board for approval on whether to hire anyone
rather than to the EC. So unless you specifically want to delegate the contractual
authority to the EC there is an inconsistency. The other inconsistency was, as I
read it, it said that to direct, for the committee to retain and then follow it up after
you have retained them you are going to solicit proposals. I just that it was
-17_
inconsistent. I wanted to clarify it.
Collins: If it is the proper format to stop and to retain. . .
TLW: Or just to consider whether the consultant should be retained. . .
Collins: Here is what I'm trying to do. I'm trying to get a small body, because we
can't do it here evidently this evening, a small body of the executive board which
is representative of this Board to listen to all of the facts. I think the facts have to
be the answer. It's not a case of whether General Manager Sylvester's report was
satisfactory or unsatisfactory. The facts have to be considered and there is a
definite need in my mind to have an independent party come in. Not Directors
t because we, quite frankly, aren't smart to get into it, not the staff, not the
attorneys, not anybody else that is attached to and associated with this Board. It
has to be an independent, a pure, unbiased, unquestioned party to come in and do
1 an analysis and present that analysis back to the Directors. Now that is what I
want to get done and if I have failed to express that, then if you could put that,
Tom, into better language to effect that, that is what I want. (end of tape)
/ Partin: Where do you get the facts, John? From The Register or whoever gives
the information to The Register? What facts are you talking about? The facts are
the same facts that have been thrown out and blown up in a newspaper article
because we are now involved in negotiations. Everything is bogged down. It
makes the Districts look bad, its' Board of Directors look bad. Throw every bit of
mud you can at it. The same thing is happening in my city with the police
department. It is happening in a lot of municipalities. This is nothing new. I read
those articles in The Register and trash them. As an engineer I've worked a lot of
big projects and I know that you cannot ever in your wildest dreams hope to come
in under what you budgeted for.
Collins: You asked a lot of questions. The first question is where do I get the
facts. I'm not sure. I'm not sure where the facts come from. I don't believe The
Register has 100% facts. I'm not sure that we do as well. So what I want to do
Is get some Independent party to come in here and say hey, we'll look at the
accusations, we'll look at the response if they don't match up or, what I think may
have happened because there are some things that I don't want to prejudge a little
bit there, that the procedures are not affective procedures. I have a concern when
the design engineer is the person who does the quality assurance part. And that is
unfair to Tom, quite frankly, and to his department. I would rather see some
procedural changes. And I believe that an independent party can come in here,
that is the kind of thing we may get. And if they deal with more budgets, I don't
know. I don't want to get that far down in front of us. But there are going to be
some good, solid, independent recommendations made from whoever we can get.
I assume we can get some independent people.
_18_
Partin: That may be a problem.
Collins: It may be. But let's let the EC decide that. If the EC says there is no way
we can get an independent party to do this, have them come back to us and make
that recommendation. We've done business with almost every design engineer on
the western seaboard, I assume. And it may be difficult to get a good design
engineer to come. Or maybe we can get some independent auditor to go off and
hire a design engineer or contractor or procedural person or administrator or
whatever, and come in and give us some recommendations. I think it's time we do
that. And I have some concerns.
JC: Let me say this. I agree with where I think you are going, John. I feel that
certainly our procedures in the past, because of the fact that we have chosen, and
I think a lot of our new directors are not aware of this but we have chosen to have
a small staff deliberately and to work through the procedures that we currently
have and that is to go out, hire consultants and other people to do our work for us.
I agree that I think maybe we need to analyze our practices and procedures and we
may find that the recommendation of someone could be maybe we ought to
change and maybe we should hire 50 engineers and do our own work. That might
be the recommendation. I don't know. And then we have to struggle with that. I
don't think that The Register article, while I disagree with a lot that's said, I still
think that it doesn't mean that we should hide our heads in the sand and say well,
just because it came out of The Register or whatever that there is nothing there. I
am fully satisfied from my investigation that there is not a total truthfulness but
that doesn't mean to say that I don't agree with looking at what our practices and
procedures are and seeing if there is a better way to do it. 20/20 hindsight is
always great. We can always be critical after the fact. But, you know, we're in
the trenches. They are in the trenches. We've got to understand that. I think if
you're going in that direction where we're basically trying to look at our practices
and procedures and see if there is a better way that we can do this, I don't think
staff or anybody here will disagree with that. I think it is how are we getting there
that is the problem.
Collins: If I may, sir. I agree with.what you said. I think we now have in front of
us the incidence through at lease assume that will give us a leading indicator of
where we should start looking to examine our procedures. If we do have difficulty,
and please don't get me wrong. And nobody in the audience should get me
wrong. I am not saying we do. I'm saying if we do have difficulties that at least
the accusations that have been raised seem to be significant enough that they
should be looked at and perhaps exposed so that procedural changes or staffing
changes that we should make. Just as a quick add, I would also like to challenge
the EC Directors to attend the New Directors' Orientation because I think it will be
helpful to understand the plant and its facilities.
-19-
JC: I think everybody should attend it. I think if you haven't, you're cheating
yourself. Director Stanton and then Director McGuigan.
Stanton: Mr. Chairman, I think as a result of this what you have concluded and
satisfied yourself might be a possible outcome. And in fact everybody might then
agree with you. But just for Mr. Partin's purpose, one thing if you read that article,
Mr. Woodruff, it looks like there have been certain documents obtained through
The Register through a freedom of information search. Is that true or not?
TLW: They didn't make a freedom of information search.
Stanton: They asked for documents?
TLW: Sure. The Register reporter is in the room tonight for those of you who
didn't know that. He's been over here at the Districts, I don't know, 6, 8 or 10
times. He's been on the phone. We've given him response, we've attached—
Stanton; The answer is yes. That's all I want. A yes or no. So, you know, that
little tiny _ was, why weren't we ever told that The Register reporter is over
here in our files getting documents? Why weren't we told that? And second part,
b, I'd like to see copies of the very documents that this District gave him so I can
look at it with The Register article, I'll give you a copy of that, to see if there is
match. I'd like to see those. As a matter of _, that has happened in my city, in
my county. If there is an information search, we're notified and we're given the
documents that were given to the press. As one Director, I will make that request.
TLW: We have a log, I believe, of everything that the Register reporter requested,
a copy of. He spent many hours here. He looked at, we handed over to him for
his review something on the order of 100 or 150 manilla file folders, and they
were of varying thicknesses, and he didn't make copies but looked and took his
notes so we have no record --
Stanton: He has no copies of any documents?
TLW: No, I said he requested copies and we made some copies and we have a log
of everything he has a copy of and it's no problem, I'm sure, that staff and Board
Secretary's office, we have, the District has a log of what was copied.
Stanton: May we, as Directors, get copies of those documents copied by the
reporter at the EC meeting?
TLW: Of course.
McGuigan: Mr. Chairman, I'm not sure of this. I'm not a member of the EC but
-20-
I'm not sure if I were whether I would have any idea specifically as to where you
are going to go. Mr. Collins was mentioning about changing procedures and we're
looking at something that did happen that maybe could have been misreported,
perhaps. I'm concerned as to whether or not the EC going to have specific
direction for deciding how to choreograph the proposals let alone what type of
concern or_ we would be able to respond to.
Hammond: Two points. First of all, it seems like we did call for the question and
this was supposed to be only a definition of what the question was to be.
JC: I think it's trying to clarify specifically what the words were or what the
meaning of the words was, if you will.
Hammond: Second point, my preference, and I don't know how John or anyone
else would feel about this, but would be to direct the EC to define the scope of
work, request proposals and bring those proposals back to the entire Board for final
review. This would be a substitute motion.
Seconded
JC: Alright, we have a substitute motion. Did everyone hear that? Alright,
Director Moreno.
Moreno:
JC: Okay, we have a substitute motion.
Collins: I did not hear it, Mr. Chairman.
JC: Okay, state the motion and then we'll go
Hammond: I'll do my best to get it in the same way to direct the EC to define the
scope of work, to request proposals and bring those proposals back to the entire
board for authorization.
Collins: So in other words, you are changing my motion is not referencing the
accusations made by The Register so I'm not sure what proposals or what
investigation you are talking about.
Hammond: I think the EC may want to limit it to The Register accusations or may
want to expand it somewhat depending upon other issues that might come up on
their own sight between now and then and input that other Directors may pass on
to the EC between now and then.
-21-
Welch: I think that's a real good idea. My question was going to be with regard
to the original motion whether or not it included the delegation that Tom talked
about to the EC of the authority to actually make and enter into a contract, not just
solicit bids but to enter into a contract. I was going to object to that. I prefer the
substitute motion.
Sansone: I have a second substitute motion. What is going on is water over the
damn. It has been answered by the General Manager. I suspect that from this
point, and here's the motion, that we institute and authorize an audit of our
operational and technical procedures.
Seconded
Director I?j: No it isn't. I think the point he is trying to get through here is to
forget about the articles in The Register. Hire the proper consultant to come in and
review our procedures. All he has to do is take into account the articles in the
paper and the response by the General Manager and make his determination.
Ferryman: I agree. I think Director Sansone has gotten to the heart of the thing.
That's where we need to be and I think that's where everyone's concerns are. Are
we following the proper procedures and as John mentioned earlier, as far as ------
already authorized, so I agree with the substitute motion on the floor.
JC: Alright, the substitute substitute motion. Further discussion? Alright, we're
going to go for the substitute substitute motion. We all know what that is. Phil,
state it again.
Sansone: That we authorize the EC to employ an independent
investigator/consultant to perform an audit on operational and technical
procedures.
JC: Alright and that's seconded. Under discussion let's go to Debay and then
Barrera.
Debay: I'm curious by what consists of an audit. What from the staff? What are
you talking about? Are we going to look at every procedure book here? What do
you mean by audit?
Sansone: An operational audit, it is pretty well standard. We did this at the waste
management commission and they tore us apart. An independent audit. They
recommended changes on all different types of procedures and it was up to the
commission and the board to agree to it, which they did and that is what I'm
looking for here. Someone to come in independently and look at how and the way
we are doing business and say is this the best way it can be done. Can it be done
-22-
better in a different way?
Debay: How long did it take and how much did it cost?
Sansone: I don't remember, Pat McGuigan, do you remember how much?
McGuigan: I've been wracking my brains trying to think. I think it was at least
half a million dollars.
Barrera: Mr. Chairman, have we ever done and had any kind of an audit in the
past in our history as to procedures. Was there one done ---?
JWS: Not the type you are specifically talking about. The independent financial
auditor checks our internal controls and, in fact, the Board just passed an action
tonight to hire them to do an extension of that. But the type that you are talking
about, no.
Barrera: Could that be added to that particular same audit?
JC: I don't know that they are the ones that should do it, Fred.
Stanton: I would speak strongly against the substitute motion. It is a subset of
the Hammond-Collins motion. It is a smaller portion of it. You might very well end
up with looking at procedures that in fact have -- to have failed and adjust those
procedures. The other thing I object to, with all due respect sir with regard to your
motion, is you are saying that's water under the bridge. The whole issue is water
that has been under the bridge that maybe we haven't seen go by and we want to
go back and see what was happening over the last three years. I am totally
against saying we'll just close the door on the time period from now past and we
look at everything from this point on in the future, the whole point of what's being
discussed now, when you look at these incidents, when you read the Directors'
report, we're talking about past issues in terms of when we were told things,
when we weren't told things, whether we are in warranty and what happened.
The whole issue we just went through in the arbitration was passed. You can't
say that you are going to cut off and forget this. You've got to look at this. The
whole purpose, I think with John Collins' original motion and Barry's amendment
thereof.
JC: Alright, thank you. Director Gullixson, Director Collins and then Director
Sansone:
Sansone: I'd like to withdraw my motion.
JC: Alright, the motion has been withdrawn.
-23-
Gullixson: I'm in support of the substitute motion because I think it approaches
the EC and it allows them the flexibility with a broad brush to narrow the issue
itself and bring it back to the Board ------- I think the EC needs the flexibility right
off the bat and let them have the broad brush approach to bring the issue back.
JC: Alright. One last vote. We did have a hand and then we'll go to the vote.
Director Collins?
Collins: My concern is to combine both efforts here. And I understand my
concern when I made the motion to begin with was not just to come up with
better procedures, which I think would be the offshoot of doing this, but whether
we like it or not, we have accusations that have been made against us or our
position. They have to be responded to. We represent millions of people in this
county who have a right to know what our response is to those accusations. And
the accusations' response can best come, from a credibility state anyway, from an
independent person. If you rate all of these things down and each accusation, and
even if we give our response to the Register and say that's not true, they said this,
so forth, I would rather have it come from an independent party that says here is
the accusation and here are the facts. The accusation is wrong or the accusation
has some merit and here is something that can come from a procedural change to
preclude it from happening in the future.
JC: John, let me ask you a question. I'm going to abstain, by the way, on all of
these motions because I don't think they are an emergency, but let me just say
this. Do you think that you could listen to the responses that would be given by
the staff to these particular accusations and determine whether they are right or
wrong?
Collins: Could I listen to them? Absolutely.
JC: Do you think you could understand if somebody, if you were to read a letter
that basically said something totally different than the article in the newspaper, do
you think you could read and understand that?
Collins: I would have a tough time understanding some of these issues.
JC: I think, to be honest with you, I've gone through this with the staff. I think
any of us could understand them. I do. I think any of us could understand those
issues. Alright, that simple. I don't have a lot of expertise myself, as you know,
but nonetheless I tell you I've sat down, I've looked at the documents, I've talked
with staff, I've asked the questions and I think that you could understand where
everything truly is. And I would say that to any Director in this room. So, you
know, I don't know right now, very honestly, that we need to hire somebody to do
an investigation of every allegation in The Register. I do feel that there are maybe
-24-
some things that we ultimately may want to change. Not because it is wrong, but
it might be better. But I think I'd give yourself a chance first to listen to what the
staff has to say and to find out if, in fact, there's really any merit to all of this
stuff. And if you feel after that that there is, move on with it. Or if you feel that it
is too technical and you can't understand it, move on with it.
Collins: Mr. Chairman, you have said so often we can have a difference of opinion
and I believe we have one now. Because I don't believe, I don't have an
engineering background and some of the other backgrounds that would be required
to fully understand and comprehend all of the answers.
JC: I don't think it takes that.
Collins: Well, I do because of some of the things --- the engines for the last year
or so and some of the other technical issues. If staff came up and said it was
blue, I would have to be totally at the mercy of staff saying trust me, I've looked
into and it's not the case.
JC: This stuff wasn't just listening to staff. This was reading documents.
Debay: I was going to ask if it would be better to schedule an additional meeting
to do just exactly what you suggested. For two years I have been sitting here
taking the advice of the EC not knowing the facts so maybe it's time you involved
all the Directors and do exactly what you just suggested.
Stanton: Mr. Chairman, with regard to a very special comment of discussion
between you and Mr. Collins, I don't think the issue Is who is smart and who isn't
smart. I think the issue is independence, as called by his motion.
JC: Alright, we have a motion and a second on the floor. We're going to go with
it. Repeat the motion, the second motion. This is the substitute motion.
Hammond: Penny, do you have it written down?
ABS: The motion is to direct the EC to define the scope of work, request
proposals, and bring the proposals back to the Board for final review.
JC: Alright, we have a motion and a second for that.
Hammond: regarding the allegations that have recently been made
ABS: Excuse me and to allow the EC to limit it to The Register article or expand it,
if possible, with other input from other Directors
-25-
TLW: Scope of work to include The Register article
Hammond: Right, but not limited to
Stanton: to include but not limit to
JC: We have a motion and a second. I will abstain. The motion carries. We will
now go into closed session.
#113
JWS: Mr. Dawes, the question was if there's a problem if the contract under
Item 13 was continued for 60 days
TMD: Thg bids allow a 60 days from the opening. I believe the opening was
February 1st so a 60ddays continuation, a 30 day might get us.... I'm sure the
contractor, if we ask him would give us more time also.
?: ------ direct that the contractor give us more time and otherwise ---- a 30 day.
JC: Well, ok.
Barrera: In comments, when the contractors-------
JC: Go ahead, Fred.
Barrera: I said would this ------- with this contractor the one that we just did the ---
and everything was fine.
TLW: We have used this contractor here on a number of our jobs and the jobs
from a construction point of view have always come in on time and within budget
and the quality of their work has been excellent. In terms of accidents, we have
no reported accidents from this contractor either.
JC: Further discussion?
JC: Alright, in discussing with General Counsel. Maybe two things we need; first
off is if you want to cancel or undo the prior action we need a motion and a
second to do that. $gcondarily, we need clarification of what it is specifically we
are going to do just wait 60 days or what?
?: I think parliamentary rules are that wet Onsider the motion that automatically ---
--- the previous motion.
nyj Lu.�•
-26-
TLW: Well, that is I like when you have something like this I like the record to be
as thorough and complete as possible and so the effect is of reconsideration does
that. I just want everyone is aware of what it would be doing if that is what your
intent and decision is that you effectively cancel the prior action earlier and
reinstate the item on the agenda.
Ferryman: Are we trying to achieve something within the 60 day period? Is there
going to be a closure on this other issue within the 60 days period that is going to
determine whether we are going to go forward with this contract?
JC: I don't know how to answer that.
TLW: I don't know how to answer that either. As the Chairman, I am not sure
what direction I am given or anybody else is given as to what we can come back
with.
?: The reason I said 60 days is pulling off of thin air. I thought this was an
on-going investigation and information is evolving would be provided the Districts
in this tragedy and maybe in another month or two we would have a better
comfort level as whether Pascal & Ludwig would ----- called for or not. We may
not have an answer and I guess we have to deal with it at that time. ------- a little
bit more time. I mean rather than approve a million dollar contract tonight for
something that is ......
JC: There is an alternate to that too but ... Director Hammond?
Hammond: I was just going to clarify what I thought John's motion was. I
thought his notion was sim I to rescind ntinue with a minimum
o days and discuss with the contractor the option of ------ a total of 60 days to
give us the opportunity to see what future information might come to light
regarding ----- of the contractor and the accident before we actually let him
contrac again an a motion was seconded. Fred jumped in but I did second it.
JC: Ok, in discussion, Tom what would the problem be if we just didn't approve
this at all but rejected all bids? Where are we going to stand if we don't go
forward with this project? Because if we are looking at 60 days from the date the
bids were opened we have to be done before our next meeting. There has to be a
decision because by that time the 60 days will have run.
TMD: There should be no reason why you couldn't reject these bids There is
nothing urgent on this job. It is a repair type job, fixing things up, issues like that.
It is not standing on a critical path with respect to any other work so the bids
could be rejected.
-27_
JC: Well, the thing is that the bids are good for 60 days from the date they are
opened. If they would extend it, that would be fine. But, it is either that. If we
don't, then we could reject them. The thing is the 60 days will not occur until
til
after, it will occur before our next Boar meet ng. There were opened
February 1st, I e ieve was the comment. March, April. They were opened on
February 1st. It will be April.
�1•` Gullixson: I withdraw my previous motion. I move that we reject all bids.
JC: Alright, we have a withdrawn. Do we have a second to the motion? Alright.
?: Does this action tonight might discredit us our Sanitation Districts with respect
to cases that might come up with regards to the accident. ----- the next bid, with
rejecting him cause some suspicion that he was not a good contractor when very
well satisfied with his work all of these years. Now we come in and say well, we
reject him because we don't really trust him now. Why did we have him on board
in the first place if we know feel that way? I don't think this is a good action if we
are trying to ----- rejecting this bid or even rejecting them all because it is going to
get out what we have done. The guy has the next job coming and we decide he
may not be as good as we thought he was so we might suffer some liability from
that viewpoint. In my opinion, I don't think it is a good thing.
Debay: I was just trying to listen to the reverse side of the coin as it turns out that
we are responsible and now no contractor will work for us. I don't know what we
are trying to accomplish by this.
JC: Director Collins, Stanton and Barrera.
Collins: As I undererand it the basis for refusing the acceptance of the bids is
getting them all back The fact that they had this company has an OSHA sit
against them.
TLW: I would strongly urge and recommend that you do not make such a finding
because al we do not have the OSHA findings bl that is not basis upon which you
would want to reject it. We have in the notice of inviting bids the absolute
discretion o reject all bids without cause if you want to make it. If you want to
reject them that would be to way to do it because otherwise you would_make a
prejudicial finding for which we really have facts to support it.
Collins: That is my point because this is certainly not a criteria of selecting people
so turning them all back for basically no reason kind of concerns me.
Directors: Me too.
-28-
Stanton: Mr. Chairman, sir, may I get clarification on what I thought Mr. Dawes
said and if I am wrong I will admit error in hearing. I thought Mr. Dawes said we
could go 30 days and during that time discuss with the contractor if he would be
willing to agree to a further delay?
TMD: I said that; I am thinking now; I may be a few days off because the Board
meeting is (Tape ended)
Stanton: Thank you, sir, I did hear and .......
JC: Director Barrera and then Director Gullixson.
Barrens: There were two people killed and probably until we find out what
happened I think we should hold this thing up. This may be a great contractor but
something went wrong that is very serious.
Gullixson: The reason for bringing the motion to ----- I had a little concern with
whether the subcontractor or we willing to take the steps necessary to insure a
safe place to work and are we having appropriate safety meetin s and safer
supervisor m in erently dangerous situations involved. I think in 30 days we can
s ose ques ions, ave sta come back so we can feel that things are being
looked at from that safety perspective because essentially what Mr. Spradlin said
was that we are exposed to liability in these situations when reasonable call for
certain safety measures and we have to take them. The question is whether or
we protected ourselves b utting in writing, factual) I hint; is some
er oth exoosure but since this is not a contract t at is required to be done right now
and since we don't have to ----, I think we should review the questions about
safety, 30 and 60 days to ask reasonable questions before we award the contract.
Leipzig: Has any of the work to be done by this contractor ----------- working in
close spaces?
TMD: Not certain right now. Almost all of our contracts we have to go into
confined spaces.
JC: I believe that, correct me if I am wrong, that Dan said that they had been
working in that ditch 3 or 4 times and at one time they did have monitoring
equipment in there and decided they didn't need it anymore and this time they
didn't have it. I believe that is what he said.
Saltarelli: I agree with Director Gullixson. I think his last comment hit it right on
the head. It is not that we are taking any action on any particular contractor at
this time. Because this job was a very serious accident as Mr. Barrera said , I think
30 days to review our procedures and things like that certainly make alot of sense.
-29-
think the motion should be based on as Director Gullixson just said.
JC: So the concern then so I can understand it is not so much as
going forward wi contractor but it is concern that do we have a sa e
environment?
Gullixson: Safe work environment and have we documented the safety
requirements necessary to eliminate our liability if someone is hurt on the
workplace who is employed by the subcontractor.
JC: Director Partin and then McGuigan.
Partin: I think this is a very dangerous time in possible future litigation coming up
about this to be doing anything with respect to investigation our in-house safety
precautions and procedures. It may need to be done but I don't think that this
very moment we should be broaching that subject.
�y McGuigan: The motion as I understand it is to reject all bids?
JC: That Is the motion.
JC: Let me just say another point was just raised by General Counsel and that is
that if time 30, 60 or whatever days would make a difference what could happen
now is Tom could talk to them and see if they would be willing to continue this
matter for a period of months at their agreement and if in fact... excuse me.
Stanton: I'm sorry, sir.
JC: Excuse me, I am sure what you have to say is more important than what I
have to say.
Stanton: That is what Dawes said before.
JC: But again it has been pointed out that if in fact the contractor does not wish
to continue this matter to a time that we feel would be reasonable that is going to
lapsed any way after 60 days. We could do that and if in fact that happens then
there is nothing that we have accepted. We have to go back out for bids again so
we can do it either way but again I bring it up only because it just suggested to
me. I think either way it goes, it would work. The motion on the floor currently is
to reject all bids. --
TLW: If I could add one point that I know has been raised by Directors before. By
rejecting all bids means that we would have to go back and republish and incur
those costs. Second thing is this bid came in $300,000 below estimate so it is a
-30-
very attractive bid for the benefit of the Districts. I was suggesting that if you
want the time and I think that makes good sense to take the 30 or 60 days to get
t e investigation. If you smp y on ac on if ah�f Pascal & Ludwig oesn t
agree to extending the award by 60 days then he lost the bid anyway and we
won't have the bid ro anvbodv We will be back and we will go out for new bids.
If he does agree to it and within 60 days the Boars etermme we will or we won't
award it to them you preserve the ootion of at least of preserving a good bid as
well as having your investigation.
Debay: May I ask the engineers or technical people here if they are concerned
about this company?
TMD: This company has had a 5 or 6 jobs with us over the last several years;
mostly smaller jobs under $1 million and I have never heard from our people that
they are unsafe, notwithstanding the terrible accident that took place but I haven't
heard any reports of that.
Gullixson: It is not a question of whether they are unsafe, it is a question of
/� whether we are unsafe to the point that we pose ourselves liability. I withdraw my
motion and move that we continue if you think we can get awav with that ----------
(very loud cough that wiped it out) and award it within 60 days anyway.
JC: Alright, we have a new motion. Any discussion? We have a second. Any
discussion? Any opposition to the motion? Alright, thank you.
-31-
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 19 2, 39 59 69, 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
MARCH 9, 1994
ITATIO
Is
O9q GE COVN•
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on March 9, 1994. at 7:30 p.m., In the
District&' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the foil was
called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. 7, 11, 13 and 14
as follows:
ACTIVE ALTERNATE
DIRECTORS DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO.1: Fred Be... Chairman Gen.Beyer
Pat McGuigan,Chairman pro tam Thomas E. Lutz
r James M.Ferryman Nate Reade
Thomas R. SalNmlli Leslie Pontious
_L Roger Stanton William G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO.2: x Jahn Collins, Chairman George Scott
Iry Pickier, Chairman pro tam Tom Daly
s_ Fred Barren Gene Beyer
• Buck Catlin Chris Norby
• Be"Danes Bob Bell
Norman Z.Eckemode Michael Maenzweiler
Wiliam D.Mahoney James H.Flora
i Carrey J. Nelson _ Glenn Parker
Miguel Pulldo Thomas E.Lutz
Roger Stanton William G.Stainer
Denlel T.Welch John M. Gullisson
George L.Maknt Sheldon Singer
DISTRICT NO. 3: a Sal A. Studied, Chairman Wiliam C.Estrada
_ Surnle Dunlap. Chairman pro tam Carrey J.Nelson
George Brown Gwen A.Forsythe
1� Buck Catlin Chris Thin,
John Collins George Scott
James H.Flora William D. Mahoney
Don R.Griffin Donald Bane
Wally U. Eva G. Miner
Thomas E.Lute Pat McGuigan
Onde Moulton-Patterson Earle Rabitallle
Richard Panin _ Joyce C.Nicholson
by Pickier Tam Daly
Margie L. Rice James V.Evans
Sheldon Singer �_ George L.Zlaket
y_ Roger Stanton _ William G. Steiner
Chades Sylvia Anthony Selvaggi
DISTRICT NO.5: _ John C.Co.,Jr.,Chairman Jan Debey
Phil Sansone,Chairman pro tam Jan Deasy
Wiliam G. Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.B: James A.Wavier. Chairman Arthur Perry
• Evelyn Hart,Chairman pro tam John C.Co.,Jr.
• William G.Stainer Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.7: Berry Hammond,Chairman Mike Ward
James A.Waller, Chairman pro tam Mike Schaefer
Fred Bader Gem Beyer
Jan Deb" Phil Sansone
Ted Moreno Miguel Pulido
Charles E.Puckett _ Thomas R. S.1m.111
y_ Wiliam G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 11: �_ Grace Wnchell, Chairman Earle Rabitellle
Victor Leipzig.Chairman pro tam Linde MoultonYartarson
x Roger Stanton Wiliam G. Steiner
DISTRICT NO. 13: John M.Gullizson, Chairman Daniel T.Welch
a Fred Danes.Chairman pro hem Gem Beyer
Glenn Parker Bumle Dunlap
Iry Fickler Tam Daly
j William G.Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.14: Peer A.Swan,Chairman Grand Miller
y_ Lealle PontioUS, Charman pro tam Chad"E. Puckett
x Fred Be.. Ga.Sayer
x _ Bony Hammond Mika Ward
a William G. Sigma, Roger Stanton
-2-
03/09/94
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G.
Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary,
Carl E. Beach, Pat Brady, Peter Brown, ,a
Mike Broyles, Frank Chavez, Corinne Clawson, t,l
Don Crapnell, James Elo, Dave Erdkamp,
John Finias, Chuck Frey, Gary Hasenstab,
Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, Tod Jacobson,
Larry Lazorek, Mark Legg, John Linder,
Robert Morris, Karl Nordgren, Bob Dolan,
Joseph Park, William Pierce, L. Ellen Ray,
Lynn Redman, Phil Serrantino, Mary Simpson,
Manny Stoffer, Jim Tintle, Jack Vincent,
Mike Wilson, Chuck Winsor, Jeff Woodward,
Ray Young
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Jim Evans, Bill Fleming, David L. Hamilton,
Chris Knap, Bill Knopf, Tom Nixon, Jim Silva,
Dan Spradlin, Phil Stone
DISTRICT 3 In the absence of Chairman Sal Sapien and
Appointment of Chairman pro tam Chairman pro tam Burnie Dunlap,
Director Wally Linn was appointed Chairman
pro tam of District No. 3.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized L. Ellen Ray, an
Recognition of persons who wish to be employee on the bargaining committee for the
heard on matters of general interest Operations and Maintenance Employees, who
addressed the Boards in regard to a packet that
was distributed to Directors that evening by the committee.
The Joint Chairman also recognized David Hamilton, business agent for the IUOE
Local 501 Operating Engineers, who also addressed the Boards in regard to the current
meet and confer process pertaining to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the
Operations and Maintenance Employee Unit, urging the Boards to consider the Union's
proposal (passed out earlier) on meet and confer matters.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman
Presentation of resolutions of presented plaques and resolutions of
appreciation and plaques to retiring appreciation to retiring active directors
Directors James Evans, who represented the Midway City
Sanitary District on the Board of District No. 3,
and Jim Silva who represented the City of Huntington Beach on the Board of District
No. 3.
r
-3-
03/09/94
The Joint Chairman reported that retiring active directors Bob Bell, former representative
from Villa Park; Gail Kerry, former representative from Cypress; Eva Miner, former
representative from La Palma; Maria Moreno, former representative from Placentia;
Robert Richardson, former representative from Santa Ana; and Hank Wedaa, former
representative from Yorba Linda, were unable to attend the meeting that evening.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the tentatively
Reoort of the Joint Chairman scheduled upcoming meetings as follows:
9
Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, March 16th, at 5:30 p.m.
Executive Committee - Wednesday, March 23rd, at 5:30 p.m.
(Directors Jan Debay and Barry Denes were also invited to attend.)
Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers - Wednesday, March 30th, at
5:30 p.m.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that the New
Report of the General Manager Directors' Orientation and Treatment Plant Tour
was scheduled for Saturday, March 19th from
9:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. For those Directors who had not responded with regard to their
attendance to the orientation and tour, the General Manager requested that they complete
the form that was placed in their folders that evening. '
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to
Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to
Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to
Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to
Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to
Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-4-
03/09/94
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to
- Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to ICI
Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Or
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to
Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments to
Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District
claims set forth on pages "A" and "S"
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are
hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
02/09/94 02/23/94
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $538,036.05 $803,402.14
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 385,751.73 1,848,590.58
Joint Working Capital Fund - 151,387.48 152,171.14
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,700.91 26,613.41
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 8,237.84 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 24,875.26 2,732.08
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 46,562.38 16,759.21
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 329,467.16 714.54
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 4,854.24 21,475.30
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 44,654.43 42,360.06
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 12,416.24 8,082.35
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 102.84 0.00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 2,829.82 540.04
DISTRICT NOS. 1 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 320.10
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT 10,988.15 578,741.94
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 16.10 2,103.18
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 0.00 298.18
51.572.880.63 53.504.904.25 '
-5-
03/09/94
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Purchase of One
Self-Propelled Aerial Work Platform. That the bid tabulation and recommendation re
Specification No. E-241 award of Purchase of One Self-Propelled Aerial
Work Platform, Specification No. E-241, be, and
is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to American Hi-Lift for
a total amount not to exceed $74,785.00 plus sales tax.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approvina Amendment No. 1 to the
contract for Purchase of Hydrogen That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Peroxide. Specification No, P-140, Resolution No. 94-32, approving Amendment
assigning contract from Peroxidation No. 1 to the contract for Purchase of Hydrogen
Systems. Inc. to Vulcan Peroxidation Peroxide, Specification No. P-140, assigning said
Systems Inc. contract from Peroxidation Systems, Inc. to
Vulcan Peroxidation Systems Inc., with no
change in the terms and provisions of the original contract dated October 1, 1993. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue_a purchase
order to PacTel Meridian Systems for That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue
Amendment No. 2 to the Telephone a purchase order to PacTel Meridian Systems for
System Maintenance Agreement for Amendment No. 2 to the Telephone System
the Districts' telephone PBX and related Maintenance Agreement for the Districts'
equipment (Specification No. 5-060) telephone PBX and related equipment
(Specification No. 5-060), to extend said
agreement for a six-month period from February 22, 1994 through August 21, 1994, for
an amount not to exceed $15,468.00 for existing equipment.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Purchase of Four
Intermediate Size Four-Door Sedans.
Specification No. V-003
The Directors entered into a lengthy discussion questioning the justification for purchasing
two of the four vehicles proposed for procurement. The two vehicles requested by the
Engineering Department (planning/design and construction management) were additional
vehicles, not replacement, and the Director of Engineering commented on their proposed
use. In response to a question concerning use of Districts' vehicles versus reimbursing an
employee for use of their personal vehicle, staff and counsel explained that use of
Districts' owned vehicles was preferred because of insurance issues.
• Directors also asked about the policy for assigning vehicles to individuals to drive home
and requested that staff prepare a report. Following the discussion, the following action
was taken:
-6-
03/09/94
Authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to Swift Dodge for
the Purchase of Two Intermediate
Size Four-Door Sedans,
Specification No. V-003
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Swift Dodge
for the Purchase of Two Intermediate Size Four-Door Sedans, Specification
No. V-003, for a total amount not to exceed $21,938.00 plus sales tax, in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Procurement Program
of the State of California, and State of California Contract No. 1-94-23-10, said
vehicles to be used to replace existing vehicles in the motor pool and the
Operations division.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Chanae Order No. 3 to the
plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and
No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) specifications for Operations Center Expansion
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2),
authorizing a net addition of $36,228.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. for
three items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days
for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 2 to the
plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
No. P2.42-2 specifications for Secondary Treatment
Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2,
authorizing a net deduction of $24,407.00 from the contract with Margate Construction,
Inc. for four items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 12 calendar
days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approvina Change Order No. 1 to the
Plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
No. P2-43-1 specifications for Priority Projects Element of
Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, authorizing a net deduction of $48,807.00 from the contract with
Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for 16 items of added or deleted work, be, and is hereby,
approved.
-7-
03/09/94
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Electrification of Pumo Drives
• at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job
No. P2-42-1
Approving Chanae Order No. 7
to the plans and specifications
for Job No. P2-42-1
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 7 to the plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump
Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, authorizing a net addition of
$1,032.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper Construction Co.,
Inc. for three items of additional work, granting a time extension of 503 calendar
days for completion of said additional work, and assessment of liquidated damages
at $2,000 per day for 26 days, be, and is hereby, approved.
Accepting Job No. P2-42-1 as
complete
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-33, accepting
Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, as
complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final
Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Summons and
Complaint. Roadway Construction Co.. That the Summons and Complaint, Roadway
Inc. vs. Javaid Contractors Inc. and Construction Co., Inc.vs. Javaid Contractors,
County Sanitation Districts of Orange Inc. and County Sanitation Districts of Orange
County. Harbor Judicial District Case County, Harbor Judicial District Case
No. 94C0873 No. 94C0873, relative to a stop notice filed by a
subcontractor against Districts' contractor, be,
and is hereby, received and ordered filed: and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to
appear and defend the interests of the Districts.
-8-
03/09/94
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and aoorove staff
Summary Financial Report for That the staff Summary Financial Report for the
the six-month Period ending six-month period ending December 31, 1993,
December 31 , 1993 be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive. file and approve written reports
of the Fiscal Policy Committee and That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy
Executive Committee Committee and Executive Committee meetings
held on February 16, 1994 and February 23,
1994, respectively, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizina staff to negotiate a one-year
extension of contract with KPMG Peat That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to
Marwick for annual services for the negotiate a one-year extension of contract with
1993-94 fiscal year KPMG Peat Marwick for annual audit services
for the 1993-94 fiscal year.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made
a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizina staff to solicit proposals for
a multi-year engagement beginning with That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit
1994-95 for fiscal year auditing from the proposals for a multi-year engagement beginning
"Big Six" accountina firms and any other with 1994-95 for fiscal year auditing from the
qualified accounting firm "Big Six" accounting firms and any other
qualified accounting firm that has submitted a
request to be included, for consideration by the Fiscal Policy Committee.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made
a matter of record.
-9-
03/09/94
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions relative to Miscellaneous
Architectural and Treatment Plant
Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job
No. P1-48: Miscellaneous Work Ire
Facility Modifications and Safety
Upgrades at Plant No. 2). Job
No. P2-47-2: Flare Improvements at
Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-56: and Seismic
Retrofit Structures at Treatment Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2
Verbal report of staff
The Director of Engineering reported that in December 1993, the Directors
approved the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Architectural and
Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work
Ire Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2-47-2;
Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit Structures
at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2. This project includes several jobs
designed by both consultants and staff, combined to reduce administrative costs as
well as attract lower combined bids through economies of scale.
Mr. Dawes stated that on February 1, 1994, four bids were received for this
project. The bids ranged from a high of $1,774,430.00 to a low of
$1,003,899.00, submitted by Pascal & Ludwig Engineers and recommended that
the contract be awarded to the low bidder. The engineer's estimate was
$1,350,000.00.
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Job
Nos. P1-48. P2-47-2. P2-56 and
P2-53.2
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous
Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48;
Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2),
Job No. P2-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic
Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, changing the date
for receipt of bids from January 11, 1994 to February 1, 1994, be, and is hereby,
approved.
-10-
03/09/94
Approving Addendum No. 2 to the
plans and specifications for Job
Nos. P1-48. P2-47-2. P2-56 and
P2-53-2
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous
Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48;
Miscellaneous Work (re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2),
Job No. P2-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic
Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, making
miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
Awarding Job Nos. P11-48.
P2-47-2. P2-56 and P2-53-2 to
Pascal & Ludwio Engineers
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-34, receiving and
filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Miscellaneous
Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48;
Miscellaneous Work (re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2),
Job No. P2-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. 122-56; and Seismic
Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. 122-53-2, to Pascal &
Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount of $1,003,899.00. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Continuino consideration of action
adopting Resolution No. 94-34
awarding Job Nos. P11-48,
P2-47-2. P2-56 and 122-53-2 to
Pascal & Ludwig Engineers
Upon return from closed session where the Boards received a report from the
General Counsel pertaining to potential litigation against the Districts as owners for
work being performed by Pascal & Ludwig Engineers on Miscellaneous
Improvements and Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous Improvements at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, during which two of the contractor's employees were
killed in an industrial accident, the Directors entered into a lengthy discussion
concerning the propriety of awarding the contract for Miscellaneous Architectural
and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous
Work (re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job
No. P2-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic
Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, to Pascal &
Ludwig Engineers, because of questions about the accident on Job No. P2-49. e
-11-
03/09/94
It was then moved and seconded:
• That the Boards of Directors reconsider the previous action adopting Resolution
No. 94-34, awarding contract for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant
Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-48; Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility
Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 21, Job No. P2-47-2, Flare
Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at
Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers in the total
amount of $1,003,899.00.
The project was bid on February 1, 1994 and, according to the plans and
specifications, the Districts have 60 days to award the contract (April 2, 1994).
The Boards discussed whether to seek an extension of the 60-day award period
from the contractor to allow a review of the circumstances pertaining to the
accident or whether to reject all bids and rebid the job.
Following further discussion the motion was withdrawn and a new motion was
made and seconded:
That all bids received for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant
Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7.48; Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility
Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2-47-2; Flare
Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at
Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, be rejected.
In the context of overall considerations, Directors pointed out that extending the
award period would allow a review of the Districts' and contractors' safe work
environment issues together with safety policies and procedures.
Following further discussion the motion to reject all bids was withdrawn.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the prior action to adopt Resolution No. 94-34 be set aside; and that action to
adopt Resolution No. 94-34 awarding a contract for the listed jobs be continued for
60 days; and that staff be directed to confer with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, the
low bidder for said project, to obtain their consent to a delay in the award beyond
that prescribed in the contract documents to allow the Districts to review safety
procedures, policies, practices and records for construction on Districts' property.
It was noted that if this consent was not granted by the low bidder, then all bids
would expire and the project would have to be rescheduled for re-bidding.
-12-
03/09/94
ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors the
Convene in closed session pursuant to need for a closed session as authorized by
Government Code Section 54957.6 and Government Code Section 54957.6 and
54956.9 54956.9 to review:
1) The respective positions of the Districts' and the Districts' employee groups with
the Districts' designated representatives regarding the salaries, benefits and terms
of employment of the Districts' employees and to provide instructions to said
representatives.
2) The potential litigation arising out of a construction accident on the Districts' plant
site.
Director Stanton requested clarification prior to convening in closed session that the
Directors would not engage in any discussion of recent newspaper reports (concerning
problems on four Districts' construction projects). He expressed his opinion that any such
discussions should be done in public session.
The Joint Chairman agreed. He stated, however, that two of the reports (namely, the
status of pending litigation involving Cooper Industries, Brinderson Corporation and the
Districts relating to breach of contract for purchase and installation of central generation
engine-generator sets, and the status of potential litigation against contractors who
installed facilities for the Odor Control Project) would probably need to be discussed in
closed session as they involve possible litigation.
Oirectina Executive Committee to
define scope of work for a review
of the Districts' construction
proiects referred to in recent press
accounts, with authority to direct
or expand the scope, and to
request proposals for said review
for consideration by the Boards
It was then moved and seconded that the Boards direct the Executive Committee to
consider at its next meeting, whether to retain an independent consultant to
undertake value engineering and investigate the issues set out in The Register
article; and, if the Executive Committee approves the hiring of a consultant, that
the Executive Committee be authorized to solicit proposals.
During discussion that followed it was clarified that the consultant would be
reporting to the Directors and not to the staff or legal counsel. Also discussed was
whether it was within the Executive Committee's discretion, after considering the
issues, to proceed with the review and, if so, to solicit consulting proposals for the
Boards' consideration in order that it may be accomplished as quickly as possible.
The maker of the motion, with the concurrence of the seconder, then clarified that ,
the intent of the motion included authorization for the Executive Committee to get
the ball rolling and to interview people to start the process.
-13-
03/09/94
A brief discussion followed pertaining to a suggestion to further define exactly what
was proposed to be studied because of potential costs, and whether the review
should be by a third party or could be done in-house.
After further discussion among the Directors, Districts' General Counsel advised
that since the matter is moving in a different direction than just setting it on the
agenda for the next Executive Committee meeting, and is being discussed with the
probability of taking action on something, the Directors needed to have a 2/3 vote
to add this item to the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2 as
an emergency item that arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda or if it is
deemed to be an emergency item.
It was then moved and seconded to add this item to the agenda pursuant to
Government Code Section 54954.2.
During the discussion that followed, General Counsel was asked for an opinion as
to whether this could be considered an emergency item. Mr. Woodruff stated that
an item can be added on to the agenda if the item arose subsequent to the posting
of the agenda 72 hours prior to the meeting. If the Boards make the finding that it
is, in fact necessary to act upon the item, then it can be added. It does, however,
require a 2/3 vote.
The Joint Chairman then asked if there was any opposition to the motion of adding
this item to the agenda. Directors Grace Winchell, George Brown, Richard Partin,
Carrey Nelson, Daniel T. Welch, Charles E. Puckett and William D. Mahoney
opposed. Chairman Mahoney declared that the motion carried adding the item on
to the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54952.2.
Directors then requested clarification as to whether the Executive Committee could
forego an outside review if a majority of the Executive Committee would feel that
the written response by the General Manager satisfactorily answers the questions
that have been raised. The Joint Chairman stated that the Executive Committee
would do whatever the Boards direct them to do but the option of not proceeding
with the outside review was not part of the current motion. It was also suggested
that the Executive Committee should have to argue a rationale for proceeding
before the Boards before going forward with a review.
-14-
03/09/94
Following further discussion some of the Directors expressed concern over the cost
of an outside consultant. Directors expressed concern that the scope of work and
objectives be well thought out and that the cost not be open-ended. There was a
request for further clarification of the motion as to whether or not the Executive
Committee could have authority to merely solicit proposals or to, in fact, engage a
consultant. There was also some discussion about the accuracy of The Register
articles, and other current events influencing the issue. Also discussed was the
probable benefits of a third party review to sort out the issues and develop any
recommended improvements in policies and procedures or changes in current policy
of utilizing consultants versus increased staffing. Staff was also asked to provide
copies of documents requested by The Register to the Executive Committee.
A substitute motion was then made and seconded to direct the Executive
Committee to define the scope of work, request proposals and bring the proposals
back to the entire Board of Directors for final review.
Following further discussion concerning clarification of the substitute motion and
whether it was necessary to investigate The Register's allegations, a second
substitute motion was made and seconded that the Executive Committee employ
an independent investigator/consultant to perform an audit on operational and
technical procedures.
After discussion of the second substitute motion, it was withdrawn by the maker.
Following further discussion the substitute motion was restated as follows: To
direct the Executive Committee to define the scope of work, request proposals and
bring the proposals back to the Boards for final review and decision, and to allow
the Executive Committee to include but not limit it to The Register article, or
expand it to possibly include input from other Directors.
The motion carried with Joint Chairman Mahoney and Vice Joint Chairman Puckett
abstaining.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
The Boards convened in closed session at 9:02 p.m. pursuant to Government Code
Sections 54957.6 and 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by
the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California
Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in
the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings.
ALL DISTRICTS At 9:41 p.m. the Boards reconvened in regular
Reconvene in regular session session.
I
I
-15-
03/09/94
DISTRICT 1
Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item
relative to Summons and Complaint for
Property Damage. La Vets Monterey
Condominium Association. a California
non-orofit. mutual benefit corporation:
and Robert Seaesta. an individual vs.
Mladen Buntich Construction Company.
Inc. and County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County. Orange County
Superior Court. Case No. 726220
Authorizing consideration of
Supplemental Agenda Item
relative to Summons and
Complaint for Property Damage,
La Veto Monterey Condominium
Association. a California
non-profit, mutual benefit
corporation: and Robert Seaesta.
an individual vs. Mladen Buntich
Construction Company. Inc. and
County Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County. Oranae County
Superior Court. Case No. 726220
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors does hereby authorize consideration of a supplemental
agenda item relative to Summons and Complaint for Property Damage, La Vote
Monterey Condominium Association, a California non-profit, mutual benefit
corporation: and Robert Segesta, an individual vs. Mladen Buntich Construction
Company, Inc. and County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, Orange
County Superior Court, Case No. 726220, which was not posted 72 hours prior to
the Board meeting date because the request to take said action arose subsequent to
the agenda being posted.
-16-
03/09/94
Receive and file Summons and
Complaint for Property Damage,
La Vote Monterey Condominium
Association. a California
non-profit. mutual benefit
corporation: and Robert Segesta,
an individual vs. Mladen Buntich
Construction Company. Inc. and r
County Sanitation District No. 1
of Orange County. Orange County
Superior Court. Case No. 726220
The General Counsel stated that the Summons and Complaint was in reference to
property damaged in connection with construction of the Memory Lane Interceptor,
Contract No. 2-30, a joint project between Districts 1 and 2 and the cities of
Orange and Santa Ana. During the course of excavation and during rainstorms, a
water main broke resulting in some property damage. He further reported that the
District has a construction agreement with the contractor, Mladen Buntich
Construction Company. The contract has indemnity provisions and the District is
entitled to and will require the contractor to secure counsel and represent the
interests of the District. The project was completed in July 1993.
Following a brief discussion regarding the nature of the damages, it was then
moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Summons and Complaint for Property Damage, La Vets Monterey
Condominium Association, a California non-profit, mutual benefit corporation; and
Robert Segesta, an individual vs. Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. and
County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court
Case No. 726220, relative to property damage sustained during the construction of
the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby,
authorized to appear and defend the interests of the District.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting
so adjourned at 9:59 p.m.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting
so adjourned at 9:59 p.m.
-1 7-
03/09/94
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting
so adjourned at 9:59 p.m.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
a Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting
so adjourned at 9:59 p.m.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Aoorovino Professional Services
Agreement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee certification of the
Corporation for preparation of plans and final negotiated fee relative to the Professional
specifications for Contract No. 6-13 Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering
Corporation for preparation of plans and
specifications relative to Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction of
Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved: and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-35-6,
approving said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, on an hourly-rate basis for
labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total
amount not to exceed $57,585.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting
so adjourned at 9:59 p.m.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting
so adjourned at 9:59 p.m.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m.
L
18
03/09/94
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m.
a
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m.
/O—zu�A&d
Assistant Secr y f Boards of Directors
of County Sa it ion s icts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 14
-19-
FUND NO 9199 - Jfi DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/94 PAGE 01
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/09/94 POSTING DATE 02/09/94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
135506 AG TECH COMPANY $50,382.14 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.9-91
135547 AMERICAN TELEPHONE&TELEGRAPH $989.19 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
135548 ABLE INDUSTRIES $954.20 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SUPPLIES
135549 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP. $9,298.00 ENGINE TESTING J-19
135550 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $53.364.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.8-9-89
135551 ALPHAGAZ $1,482.38 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135552 STN-CLOUMBUS $12.99 SUBSCRIPTION
135553 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $27083 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE
135554 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $275.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135555 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $7.129.82 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135556 ASSOC.ADMINIS.&CONSULTANTS $500.00 DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS
135557 AMSA $12.803.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES M.0.1-12-94
135558 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $1.613.62 PAYROLL SERVICES
135559 AWARDS B TROPHIES $24.46 PLAQUES
135560 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $9,853.31 LAB SUPPLIES
135561 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $430.05 TRUCK WASH TICKETS
135562 BELL SECURITY $671.00 SECURITY SERVICES
135563 WT BILLARD $35.62 BUILDING REPAIRS
M 135564 SIOSAFETY SYSTEMS,INC. $57.38 LAB SUPPLIES
Z 135%6 BID VENTURES,INC. $162.00 LAB SUPPLIES
�--i 135566 BLACK&VEATCH $31.504.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146
135567 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC..INC. $519.27 LAB SUPPLIES
.� 135568 BROWN BCALDWELL CONSULTANTS $18,920.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES RE59}701
135569 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES
n 135570 BUSH&ASSOCIATES.INC. $17.162.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.&10-92
I--. 135571 CH2M HILL S8.410.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-31
135572 CRC PRESS,INC. $42.50 LAB SUPPLIES
135M CRTC-CWPCA,INC. $315.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
135574 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $19,049.64 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pi-3B.Pl-34
135575 FIBERGRATE/CHEMWEST $3,146.30 PUMP PARTS
135576 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $30.97 SERVICE AGREEMENT -
135577 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $786.69 LAB SUPPLIES
135578 COMPUSA,INC. $4,314.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135679 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $187.57 TRUCK PARTS
135580 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1,636.75 ELECTRIC PARTS
135581 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS $49.84 PRINTING SERVICES
135582 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $194.93 TOOLS
135583 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $2,230.43 CHLORINE MQAM-91
135554 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $10,823.00 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
135585 DAPPER TIRE $413.76 TIRES
135586 PETER C.DAVID CO. $27,620.10 CONSTRUCTION 7-20
135587 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $4,788.57 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-11A3
135588 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $122.84 PRINTING
135589 DANNY L.DILLON $10.000.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
135590 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $620.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
135591 DUNKEL BROS MACH.MOVING S641.25 EQUIPMENT MOVING
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/94 PAGE 02
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/09/9/ POSTING DATE 02/09/94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135592 EASTMAN,INC. $5,380.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES
135593 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $833.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135594 EMERGENCY LIFELINE INC. $1,356.03 EMERGENCY SUPPLIES
135695 ENCHANTER,INC. $5.040.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92
135596 ENTECH LAB AUTOMATION $223.25 LAB EQUIPMENT
135597 ESSENCE GROUP $480.94 COMPUTER PARTS
135598 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $339.40 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
135599 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $747.79 AIR FREIGHT
135600 FERRELLGAS $68.10 PROPANE
135601 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1,020.18 FILTERS
135602 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $216.45 LAB SUPPLIES
135603 FOOTHILL PROJECT MANAGEMENT $1.669.00 RESIDENT NOTIFICATION SERVICES
135604 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $8,440.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES
135805 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $150.38 PHOTO SUPPLIES
136606 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $12.066.96 WATER USE
135607 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $2.160.00 APPLICATION FEE
135608 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $257.25 PERMIT FEE
m 135609 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $346.10 PAINT SUPPLIES
X 136610 THE FOXBORO CO. $313.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
Z 135611 FREEDOM IMAGING $60.85 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135612 FREEMEN ALTERNATIVE RESOURCES $4.758.00 CONSULTING SERVICES
135613 CITY OF FULLERTON $99.45 WATER USE
135614 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3,708.76 CHEMICALS
n 135815 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION $50.000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-ISA
135618 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4,422.27 TELEPHONE SERVICES
N 135617 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $630.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
135618 GRASSY S.T.I. $1,437.27 CENTRAL GENERATION PARTS
135619 DGA CONSULTANTS $2,860.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.&V1 92
135620 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $240.00 TRUCK PARTS
135621 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $432.17 MECHANICAL PARTS
135622 HEATHER HICKERSON $1,211.86 VEHICLE DAMAGE
135623 HOLMES&RARVER,INC. $43,975.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1d4
135624 HOME DEPOT 5229A0 HARDWARE
135625 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN $68.91 BICYCLE PARTS
135626 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $77,819.65 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11.18-92
135627 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $460.91 CONNECTORS
135620 INTERMEC $161.06 LAB SUPPLIES
135629 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $852.67 BATTERIES
135630 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $132.36 WATER USE
135631 JAY'S CATERING $374.98 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE
135632 JENSEN TOOLS,INC. $134.08 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
135633 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $934.95 ELECTRIC PARTS
135634 KAMAN BEARINGS&SUPPLY $1.790.81 MACHINE SUPPLIES
135635 THE KEITH COMPANIES $5,423.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3.36R
1356M KING BEARING, INC. $1.459.37 MACHINE SUPPLIES
135637 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $500.23 TOOLS
as
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2103194 PAGE 03
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/09M POSTING DATE 02/0901
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135638 LEGI-TECH $320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES
135639 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGR. $43.581.03 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140-1&2
135640 LORAIN PRODUCTS $1.251.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
1351141 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $970.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92
135542 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $477.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135643 MPS $117.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
135SN MACOMCO $412.86 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135645 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $373.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135M MATT-CHLOR,INC. 5807.62 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
135647 RS MEANS CO.,INC. $00.42 PUBLICATION
135648 MERIDIAN DIAGNOSTICS,INC. 3298.75 LAB SUPPLIES
135649 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS $75.332.80 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENTS
135650 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING 33.815.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
135651 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $211.82 LAB SUPPLIES
135652 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,308.24 UNIFORM RENTALS
135653 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $1.020.00 LAB SERVICES
135654 MONTROY SUPPLY CO. $49.82 SIGNS
135655 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $978.07 PUMP PARTS
f71
X 135SSS NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $89.36 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
= 135657 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1,931.91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135658 NEW AGE WATER TECHNOLOGY $9.02 VALVES
.-i 135669 NEW ENGLAND BIOLABS.INC. $356.40 LAB SUPPLIES
1 135660 CRY OF NEWPORT BEACH 54.79 WATER USE
a 135661 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 5251.23 TRUCK PARTS
135652 ORANGE COURIER 5257.00 COURIER SERVICES
W 1356S3 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,252.11 FITTINGS
135664 ORRICK HERRINGTON&SUTCLIFFE $30,000.00 SPECIAL COUNCIL-TAXABLE COMMER.PAPER M.O.11-10-93
135WS OXYGEN SERVICE $2,940.98 SPECIALTY GASES
136666 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $10.989.05 REIMBURSE WORKERS'COMP.INSURANCE
135667 PSI $385.50 STEAM CLEANING SERVICES
135668 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $40.84 OPERATING SUPPLIES
135669 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $8,624.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135070 PACIFIC PARTS $452.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135671 PACIFIC PNEUMATICS.INC. $47.52 FILTER
135672 PACIFIC PUBLISHERS $124.64 PUBLICATION
135873 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $214.65 SAFETY SUPPLIES
135674 PACIFIC BELL $691.83 TELEPHONE SERVICES
135576 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $159.65 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
135676 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $939.90 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
135877 PALMIERI,TYLER.WIENER, $1,33&90 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91
135678 PARAGON CABLE $3638 CABLE SERVICES
135679 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $179.69 LAB SUPPLIES
136680 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $48.066.57 CHEMICALS
135681 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $141.796.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5.8-91 -
135682 PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP. $183,18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE
135683 POLYPURE,INC. $16,B13.37 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/94 PAGE 04
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/09/94 POSTING DATE 02/09/94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135684 POWER DESIGN $6.107.32 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
135655 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $59SA3 SOIL TESTING
135686 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $6.048.40 CONSULTING SERVICES-FINANCIAL
135687 QUEST MEDIA&SUPPLIES $1.297.24 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
1356BB QUESTRON CORP. $2,470.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135689 RMB ENGINEERINGIMILLTRONICS $4,663.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135690 RM CONTROLS $421.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135691 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $6.093.19 ELECTRIC MOTORS
135692 R.S.CABINET CO. $323.25 PLAN HOLD CABINET
135693 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $1,130A3 LAB SUPPLIES
135694 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $2,624.86 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135695 ROBBINS SCIENTIFIC $301.76 LAB SUPPLIES
135696 ROSEMOUNT.INC. $62.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135697 RYAN-HERCO $463.08 METAL
135698 S&J CHEVROLET $490.12 TRUCK REPAIRS
135699 SKC WEST $840.60 SAFETY SUPPLIES
136700 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1.742.28 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135701 DOUG SARVIS $750.00 CPR/FIRSTAIDTRAINING
f71 135702 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $156,932.28 CONSTRUCTION 536
X 135703 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $683.56 SPECIALTY GASES
2
135705 CRY OF SEAL SUPPLY
$217.92 WATER USE
� 135705 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,217.92 TOOLS
-1 135706 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $436.48 TRUCKPARTS
n 135707 SHURELUCK SALES $2.878.65 TOOLSBUIRDWARE
135708 SIDU MFG CO. $3,294.29 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
r 135709 SIGNAL FLASH CO. $460.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
135710 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,065.50 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
135711 SMITH-EMERY CO. $60.00 SOIL TESTING M.0]-17-91
135712 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $56.57 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135713 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $259.24 TOOLS
135714 SOFFA ELECTRIC,INC. $92,424.15 CONSTRUCTION J-28
135715 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $16,895.81 POWER
135716 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $9.895.79 NATURAL GAS
135717 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $7,232.10 DIESEUUNLEADED FUEL
135718 SOUTH PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL $2,941.58 CHEMICALS
135719 SOUTH SHORE WINDOW MAINT. $2.083.34 BUILDING MAINTENANCE
135720 SOUVENIR PHOTO $829.15 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
136721 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $3,080.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2
135722 WESTALLOY,INC. $478.73 WELDING SUPPLIES
135723 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $657.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135724 STANDARD REGISTER CO. $635.84 LAB SUPPLIES
136726 STATE STREET BANK $5.847.71 TRUSTEE SERVICES
135726 GARY G.STREED $7,882.72 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL
135727 SUMMIT STEEL $4.056.03 METAL
135728 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $10.74 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
135729 SUPER CHEM CORP. $810.87 CHEMICALS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2103/94 PAGE 05 ,
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/09/94 POSTING DATE 02RW94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135730 TCH ASSOCIATES $1.279.40 LAB SUPPLIES
135731 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $1,506.04 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
135732 TEKDRAULICS $7.085.56 MECHANICAL PARTS
135733 TEKTRONIX,INC. $3,191.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135734 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $1,630.29 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
135735 THOMAS BROS MAPS $197.95 PRINTING
135736 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,004.89 MECHANICAL PARTS
135737 TIS TROPICAL FISH $118.63 LAB SUPPLIES
135738 TONY'S LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $169.91 LOCKS 8 KEYS
135739 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $1,271.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
135740 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $1.095.55 TRUCK PARTS
136741 TRUCO,INC. $94.82 LAB SUPPLIES
135742 TRUESDAIL LABS $2,261.78 LAB SERVICES
135743 TWINING LABORATORIES $5,479,44 LAB SERVICES
135744 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $162.86 TRUCK PARTS
135745 UHLER INC. $166,163.40 - CONSTRUCTION S-3295-33
135746 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $375.G5 PARCEL SERVICES
m 135747 UNITED STATES BIOCHEMICAL $214.47 LAB SUPPLIES
X 135748 UPCHURCH SCIENTIFIC $418.50 LAB SUPPLIES
= 135749 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4.746.71 LAB SUPPLIES
pp 135750 VALIN CORPORATION $100.90 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
�-+ 135751 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $644.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135752 VERTEX SYSTEMS $1.631.95 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
135753 WEST COAST INSTRUMENTS $737.72 GAUGE
I 1357M WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $24,071.61 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92
135755 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $157.10 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
135756 WHATMAN LAB SALES,INC. $995.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135757 WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT INST. $212.50 PUBLICATION
135758 JOHN WILEY 8 SONS,INC. $371.00 PUBLICATION
135759 ROURKE.WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $22,376.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92
135760 XEROX CORP. $176.18 COPIER LEASES
135761 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $947.96 VALVES
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/09/94 - $1,572,880.63
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/O3/94 PAGE 06
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/09M POSTING DATE 02/09/94
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND $8,237.84
#2 OPER FUND 24,975.26
#3 OPER FUND 41,139.09
#3 CAP FAC FUND 5,423.29
05 OPER FUND 4.742.90
95 CAP FAC FUND 324,724.28
#6 OPER FUND 4,854.24
#7 OPER FUND 7,305.05
#7 CAP FAC FUND 37,349.38
011 OPER FUND 7,386.64
#11 CAP FAC FUND 5,029.60
#13 OPER FUND 102,84
#14 OPER FUND 732.40
m #14 CAP FAC FUND 2.09742
x #5&6 OPER FUND 3.146.30
Z #596 CAP FAC FUND 7.841.85
#6&7 OPER FUND 16.10
JT OPER FUND 538,036.05
CORF 385.751,73
n SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 12.700 91
T JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 151.387.48
$1,572,850.63
PUND NO' 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2116194 PAGE 01
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 223/94 POSTING DATE 2/23194
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
135793 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES $809.80 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135794 AG TECH COMPANY $55,896.30 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9.91
135795 AT&T $3.566.35 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
135796 AT&T $301.98 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
136797 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $63.34 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS
135798 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION 5225,652.50 CONSTRUCTION P2.53.1
135799 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1,379.20 MECHANICAL PARTS
135800 AMERICAN CABLING&COMM. 550.54 CABLE
135801 AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION $59.00 LAB SUPPLIES
135802 AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO. $4,876.00 CONSTRUCTION PZ-51
136603 AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO. $22,548.50 SEWER REPAIRS
135604 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $500.00 SEWER REPAIRS
135805 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $4.20 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
135606 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $957.90 VALVES
135607 APEX DRUM CO. $173.00 DRUM PICK-UP
135608 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,574.07 NOTICES&ADS
135609 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $5.403.04 LAB SUPPLIES
135810 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $718.30 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
m 135811 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,291.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
X 135012 ARMOR-VAC 5420.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
136813 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $1,411.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
Ly 135814 ASSOC.ADMINIS.&CONSULTANTS $7,865.72 SFI INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS
135815 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135816 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $5,394.89 PAYROLL SERVICES
trl 135817 THE AVEBURY GROUP $5,995.68 MECHANICAL PARTS
I 135810 AWARDS&TROPHIES $434.88 PLAQUES
135818 BAILEY CONTROLS COMPANY $1,086.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135820 BANANA BLUEPRINT $7,077.42 PRINTING M.O.10-10-90
135821 BANK OF THE WEST $2,962.04 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION J-23.2
135822 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $928.85 BATTERIES
135823 BAUER COMPRESSOR $957.74 COMPRESSOR PARTS
135824 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3,518.34 LAB SUPPLIES
135825 DON C.BEATTIE P.E. $2,800.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
13SS28 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS . $856.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135827 BELL SECURITY $1,068.13 SECURITY SERVICES
135828 BIOMERIEUX VTTEK,INC. $4.750.57 LAB SUPPLIES
135829 BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS,INC. $110.43 LAB SUPPLIES
135830 BLACK&VEATCH 525,807.11 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146
135831 BOERINGER MANNHEIM $368.63 LAB SUPPLIES
135832 SON-A-RUES $378.88 TRUCK PARTS
135833 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $38,927.52 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18,7-19
135834 BRADY USA,INC. 586.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135835 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $228.73 ELECTRIC PARTS
135838 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $110.46 PUBLICATION
135837 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,768.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-1692
135830 BUY-CHEM DISTRIBUTORS $265.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
FUNO NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16/94 PAGE 02
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 2123/94 POSTING DATE 223194
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135839 CEPA $250.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135540 CS COMPANY $2,408.18 VALVES
135841 CALTROL, INC. $1,934.82 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135842 CARLETON ENGINEERS $4,154.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY
135843 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $69,496.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33,J-34
135844 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $15.788.40 SAFETY SUPPLIES
135845 CERFNET $17.10 COMPUTER SERVICES
135946 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING $4,810.23 PUMP
135841 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $57.51 LAB SUPPLIES
13SUB COUCH&SONS $676,489.70 CONSTRUCTION 5.374
135649 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,388.23 PUMP PARTS
135850 COMPUTER DATACOM $147.49 COMPUTER HARDWARE
135851 COMPUSA,INC. $4,870.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135852 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $155.99 TRUCK PARTS
135853 CONNER PERIPHERALS,INC. $510.60 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS
135854 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $11,082.07 ELECTRIC PARTS
135855 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $630.00 TOOLS
rn 135856 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $10,300.41 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.7-17-91
X 135857 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $2.440.31 CENTRAL GEN.ENGINE PARTS
= 135858 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $1,223.27 TRUCK PARTS
dy 135859 COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT $21,150.00 CONNECTION FEE REFUND
135860 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $214.45 ELECTRIC PARTS
135861 DAILY PILOT $60.00 NOTICES&ADS
dy 135862 DARTEK COMPUTER SUPPLY $122.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1 135663 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $3.100.95 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.801-93
N 1350" DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $753.71 PRINTING
135865 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $4,985.31 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
135866 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $1.397.39 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL M.0.1-13-92
135867 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $8,242.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE&REPAIRS
135868 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $70,562.53 CONSTRUCTION P146A
135869 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $5.400.00 MEDICAL INSURANCE CONSULTANT
135870 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $2.065.86 PAINT SUPPLIES
135871 ESP NORTH $127.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
135872 EASTMAN,INC. $6.468.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES
135873 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $11.95 LAB SUPPLIES
135874 ENCHANTER,INC. $3.360.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.8-10.92
135875 MARSHALL PARRIES $76.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
135876 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $357.50 AIR FREIGHT
135877 FERRELLGAS $120.49 PROPANE
135878 CHEMWEST,INC. $2.120.00 FIBERGLASS
135879 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $1,367.14 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
135880 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $144.81 LAB SUPPLIES
135881 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $37.47 LAB SUPPLIES
135882 CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $15,606.25 SURVEYING SERVICES M.OAAG-92
135883 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $228.47 PHOTO SUPPLIES
135884 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $9,081.94 BUILDING PERMIT FEES J-23-1
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16/94 PAGE 03
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 2/23194 POSTING DATE 223/94
WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135885 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $2.11 PAINT SUPPLIES
135886 FREY ENVIRONMENTAL,INC. $666.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
135887 FURON DEKORON $95.00 CABLE
135888 DST,INC. $1.210.85 COMPUTER PARTS
135889 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $747.33 LUMBER/HARDWARE
135890 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1,656.12 CHEMICALS
135891 GEAR TECH $4,000.00 MACHINE INSPECTION
135892 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $335A4 ELECTRIC PARTS
135893 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4,273,95 TELEPHONE SERVICES
135894 GEORGE LEECH&ASSOCIATES $75.23 FLOWMETERS
135895 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $8,741.68 MECHANICAL PARTS
135896 W W GRAINGER,INC. $354.82 ELECTRIC PARTS
135897 GRASEBY ANDERSON $4,283.01 LAB SUPPLIES
135898 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $1,355.61 PRINTING
135899 DGA CONSULTANTS $1,885.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92
135900 HSO TECHNOLOGY $114,519.83 CONSTRUCTION J-232
135901 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $12.93 PRINTING
m 135902 HACH COMPANY $19170 CHEMICALS
>K 135903 FREDA.HARPER $1.500,00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
Z 135904 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $843.77 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
135905 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $588.42 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
135906 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1,925.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
135907 PL HAWN CO,INC. $136.39 FILTERS
by 135906 HELLO $39.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES
I 135909 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN.
W 135910 HEWLETT PACKARD $400.00 OFFICE MACHINE
135911 HOERSIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $292.67 MECHANICAL PARTS
135912 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $69,040.91 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-44
135913 HOME DEPOT $1.048.71 HARDWARE
135914 HOOKER'S REPAIR SERVICE $55.00 LAB EQUIPMENT REPAIRS
135915 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.677.17 PAINT SUPPLIES
135916 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $25.08 WATER USE
136917 IDEKX $403.95 LAB SUPPLIES
135918 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $15,288.13 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92
135919 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $663.75 CONNECTORS
135920 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $573.82 BATTERIES
136921 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $34.66 WATER USE
135922 ISCO $1,842.53 LAB EQUIPMENT
135923 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1,025.82 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
135924 JAVID CONTRACTORS,INC. $67,912.85 CONSTRUCTION P2-23-5.1
135US JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $76.00 TRUCK REPAIRS
135926 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,008.26 ELECTRIC PARTS
135927 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $1.968.94 CHEMICALS
135928 THE KEITH COMPANIES $2,637.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-36R
135929 KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP. $192.82 FREIGHT
135930 KING BEARING,INC. 53,191.91 MACHINE SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE VIRM4 PAGE 04
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 223I94 POSTING DATE 223194
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135931 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $3,523.83 HARDWARE
135932 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $571.64 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
135933 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $375.62 SAFETY SUPPLIES
135934 LEWCO ELECTRIC $263.07 TRUCK PARTS
135935 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $3.030.21 DEFERRED COMP TRUSTEE
135936 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $7.600.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIRONMENTAL
135937 MPS $474.04 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
1359M MACOMCO $520.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT
135939 MSA $700.97 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135940 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $664.168.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2
135941 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $120.79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135942 MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS..INC. $4,135.59 METERS
135943 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES $1.848.56 ELECTRIC PARTS
135944 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $4.617.13 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
135945 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $153.40 FITTINGS
136946 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES S203.14 MECHANICAL PARTS
135947 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.603.32 UNIFORM RENTALS
135948 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $70.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
IT1 135949 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. $990.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS
X 135950 NASCO WEST,INC. $299.69 LAB SUPPLIES
135951 NATIONAL FILTER MEDIA CORP. $4.258.61 MECHANICAL PARTS
135952 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $2.432.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
135953 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY $218.09 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
135954 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $817.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
Co 135955 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $629.36 COMPRESSOR PARTS
r 135957 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE ,437.40 PUBLICATION
135958 ORACLE ORPOCORP $2.100.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
135959 ORACLE CORPORATION $2,220.97 TRAINING REGISTRATION
135959 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $228.97 TRUCK PARTS
135960 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $202.03 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
135961 ORANGE COURIER $133.50 COURIER SERVICES
135952 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1.926.28 FITTINGS
135963 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.745.83 SPECIALTY GASES
135964 PC SYSTEMS DESIGN $138.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES
135965 P&S FILTRATION,INC. $2.903.18 MECHANICAL PARTS
135966 PACIFIC PARTS $809.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135967 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $6.492.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES
135968 PACIFIC BELL $154.83 TELEPHONE SERVICES
135969 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $188.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS
135970 PADGETT-THOMPSON $395.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
135971 PAGENET $2,054.24 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
135972 PASCAL&LUDWIG ENGINEERS $13,241.70 CONSTRUCTION J32
135973 PASCAL&LUDWIG,INC. $128,600.60 CONSTRUCTION PI-38-2
135974 PASCALANDLUDWIG $173,160.00 CONSTRUCTION P243.1
135975 PASCAL&LUDWIG $27.810.00 CONSTRUCTION PI42
135976 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $274.69 LAB SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16194 PAGE 05
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 2123194 POSTING DATE 2Q3/94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
135977 PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS,INC. $18,129.58 CHEMICALS
135970 PICKWICK PAPER $305.02 STORAGE BOXES
135979 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $127.937.80 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8.91
135980 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $163.60 PLASTIC BOTTLES
135981 POLY ENTERPRISES,INC. $301.70 SAFETY SUPPLIES
135982 POLYPURE,INC. $18.198.90 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
135983 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5,000.00 POSTAGE
135984 POWER DESIGN $20.364.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS
135985 POWER PUMPS,INC. $196.38 PUMP PARTS
135986 POWER TRACK,INC. $159.69 PUMP PARTS
135987 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $62.00 ICE
135988 AOUA-CHEM.INC. $12,714.50 BOILER
135989 QUEST MEDIA&SUPPLIES $957.78 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
135990 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES.INC. $13,641.60 CMMS STAFF TRAINING M.O.8-12-92
135991 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $374.97 ELECTRIC MOTORS
135992 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1.682.71 TRASH REMOVAL
135993 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $2,096.77 LAB SUPPLIES
fn 135994 DR.SHIVAJI RAMALINGAM $1,522.50 LAB SUPPLIES
x 135995 RED VALVE CO.,INC. $1.312.67 VALVES
2 135995 DRESDNER BANK WEINHEIM $277.56 PUBLICATIONS
135997 RED WING SHOES 8207.74 SAFETY SHOES
to 135998 BOLT DELIVERY $35.44 FREIGHT
—I 135999 THE REGISTER $1,087.09 NOTICES&ADS
136000 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $5,036.97 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
i 138001 RICH COLOR LAB $51.18 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
In 136002 RYAN-NERCO $1,504.33 PUMP PARTS
136003 JOSEPH T.RYERSON&SON,INC. $636.94 TUBING
136004 SKC WEST $1,334.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES
136005 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $830.89 ELECTRIC PARTS
136006 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $269.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
136007 DOUG SARVIS $750.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
130008 SCHWING AMERICA $3,009.78 PUMP PARTS
136OD9 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $999.92 SPECIALTY GASES
136010 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $992.00 LAB REPAIRS
136011 LUDECA,INC. $1,140.57 MECHANICAL PARTS
136012 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $118.31 TOOLS
136013 SHURELUCK SALES $9,801.03 TOOLS/HARDWARE
136014 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION $253.34 LAB SUPPLIES
136015 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $179.83 LAB SUPPLIES
136016 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1.683.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91
138017 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $92.03 TOOLS
136018 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $5.376.25 PERMIT FEES
135019 SOUTH COAST WATER $466.49 SERVICE AGREEMENT
138020 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $39,674.11 POWER
136021 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $363.457.33 NATURAL GAS
136022 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $9.388.45 DIESEVUNLEADED FUEL
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2 ISM PAGE OS
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 223194 POSTING DATE 2=94
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT
130023 SOUVENIR PHOTO $67.81 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
136024 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2.347.46 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
136025 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $1,393.94 METER
136026 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $8.100.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2
136027 WESTALLOY,INC. $416.68 WELDING SUPPLIES
136028 SPECTRUM CHEMICAL $104.18 LAB SUPPLIES
136029 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCE SYSTEM $5,18625 SERVICE AGREEMENT
136030 SRECO FLEXIBLE $2,319.14 TRUCK PARTS
136031 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS $950.00 LAB EQUIPMENT REPAIRS
136032 STRATAGENE $216.73 LAB SUPPLIES
136033 GARY G.STREED $3,955.76 REINS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL
136034 SUMMITSTEEL $7.281.64 METAL
136035 SUNSET FORD $117.05 TRUCK PARTS
136036 SUPER CHEM CORP. $684.26 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
136037 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $156.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
136038 TARBY ENGINEERING $3,848.00 PUMP PARTS
136039 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $1.255.71 ELECTRIC DART PARTS
M 136040 TERRY'S CAMERA $825.67 CAMERA EQUIPMENT
X 136041 TEXTILE ENGINEERING ASSOC, $3.176.00 MECHANICAL PARTS
= 136042 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $489.44 MECHANICAL PARTS
dp 136043 TILE MATTERS $154.64 PAINT SUPPLIES
136W TONTS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $505.42 LOCKS&KEYS
136045 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $912.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
Cp 136046 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $1,235.16 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1 130D47 TUSTIN DODGE $300.15 TRUCK PARTS
136048 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $451.00 LAB SUPPLIES
136049 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $260.49 PARCEL SERVICES
136050 UNITED SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $134.82 LAB SUPPLIES
136051 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2,548.07 LAB SUPPLIES
136052 VAUN CORPORATION $525.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
136063 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $711.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
136054 VARIAN ASSOCIATES.INC. $639.27 LAB SUPPLIES
136055 WATER ENVIRONMENTAL FED. $2,271.15 PUBLICATION
136056 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $10.625.96 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92
136057 WESCO $640.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS
136058 B.L.WILCOX&ASSOC. $123.38 PUMP PARTS
136059 WTTEG $411.61 LAB SUPPLIES
136050 ROURKE.WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $64.642.76 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92
136061 XEROX CORP. $2.890.94 COPIER LEASES
136062 EVERETT H.YORK CO. $1,001.32 CENTRAL GENERATION PARTS
136C63 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0223/94 $3.504.904.25 -
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE W16M PAGE 07 a
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 2/23194 POSTING DATE 2/23194
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#2 OPER FUND $2,624.03
02 CAP FAC FUND 108.05
#3 OPER FUND 14,083.79
#3 CAP FAC FUND 2,675.42
#5 OPER FUND 714.54
#6 CAP FAC FUND 21,475.30
#7 OPER FUND 3.382.19
#7 CAP FAC FUND 38,977.87
011 OPER FUND 6,314.35
#11 CAP PAC FUND 1,786A0
#14 OPER FUND 112.00
#14 CAP FAC FUND 428.04
9187 OPER FUND 320.10
$586 OPER FUND 1,357.24
fTl #S8B CAP FAC FUND 677,374.70
X #fi87 OPER FUND 2,103.18
s #7814 OPER FUND 298.18
JT OPER FUND 803,402.14
CORF 1.840.590.58
SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 25,613A1
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 152,171.14
V 53,504,804.25
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 .2,
I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting
on //` y 19� was duly posted for public inspection
at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on
19�.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this JAA4
day of
Pe y Kyle, 1 n Secre ary o
each of the oar of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 6 14 of
Orange County, California
F27A.1
PNlTA7fON
i o4olimn 01 CIS,
1t �� op T
O
U y o ,li . N
Since 1954
ORgNGE COON
DESIGN
and
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS
MARCH 1994
[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ It [ [ [ [
REVISION DATE: 3194
JOINT WORKS CONTRACTS
BID FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
J-1 OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 1-LAND SECTION
J-2 OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2-MARINE SECTION
J-2-1 OCEAN OUTFALL DIFFUSER 9-10-64 Carollo $332.000 J SmithfW ..on $333,573.00 9-23-64 9-8-65 $333,573.00
J-3 OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION, Hoagland-FrMley&
PLANT NO. 2 3.13-59 Carollo $426,000 Kemper $413.380.00 4-9-59 9-6-59 $414,808-23
J-3A ENGINE DRIVE UNIT 2-27-61 Carollo $70,000 Waukesha Motor $36,757.00 3-8-61 10-11.61 $36,757.00
AND BOOSTER PUMPING UNIT 2.1-61 Carollo Johnson Pump Co. $25,361.00 3-8-61 10-11-61 $25,361.00
J-3-1 INSTALLATION OF THREE GAS ENGINES
WITH GEAR DRIVES AT ROTHROCK
OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION 2-6-79 OCSD $479.922 Pascal& Ludwig $247,225.00 3.14-79 1-14-81 $285,735.25
J-4&
P2-3 EXPANSION OF PLANT NO. 2(see P2-3)------------------------------------------ Houglend-Findlay& Kemper ---------------------------------------------_.-.------—_._.
J-4A 750 KVA DISTRIBUTION SERVICE
TRANSFORMER FOR PLANT NO. 2 11-9-70 CAROLLO $10,000 GENERAL ELECTRIC $8.6E5.35 11-12-70 2-1-71 $6.685.35
J-4-1 INCREASED WATER REUSE FACILITIES AT
PLANT NO.2
(FED.GRANT NO.C-06-0649) 9.26-72 Cerollo $550,000 Zisberth/Zeberth& Alper $611,000.00 10-11-72 4.10.74 $627,837.44
J-4-2 CHLORINATION FACILITIES REFURBISHMENT
AT TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 9.12-78 OCSD $1101000 Equinoz-Malibu $137,500.00 9-13-78 4-11-79 $138,186.45
J-4-2-1 CHLORINATION FACILITY REFURBISHMENT
AT TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 6-8-82 Vann 040,000 Weldinger Corp. 047,169.00 6-19-82 3.9-83 $60,101.74
J-5A SUPERVISORY CONTROL HOUSE 11-17-61 Carollo $65,000 L.A.Chapman $93.081.00 11-22-61 5-9-62 $95,562.00
J-58 MATERIALS FOR SUPERVISORY CONTROL Mnpls-Honeywell
FACILITIES 11-17-61 Carollo $235.000 Regulator Co. $209,033.00 11.22.61 3-13-53 $214,166.00
J-SC INSTALLATION OF CONTROL FACILITIES 6-13-62 Caret. $125.000 ETS-Holkin&GeWan $73,805.00 6.20-62 12-12-62 $75,414.00
Joint Work.- Paga 1
[ [ l I I . I I I I ' I [ I I I [ I I I I
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
J-513-1 PORTIONS OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL
EQUIPMENT(REDESIGN) 5-1-63 Carollo $18,000 Luscombe Engrg. $18,382.89 5-10-63 12-11.63 $18,382.69
J-60.2 PORTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL
EQUIPMENT(REDESIGNI 5-1-63 Carollo $11,000 Mnpla-Honeywell $10,849.00 5.10.63 12-11-63 $10.889.00
J-SE INSTRUMENTATION--1965 7-1-65 Carollo $50,900 Honeywell $59.446.00 7-14-65 7-13-66 $52,591.80
J-5.1 INSTRUMENTATION AND INSTALLATION FOR
JOBS J-6 AND P2-25 ALL BIDS REJECTED
J-6 OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION,
UNIT 2 10.10-82 Carollo $490,000 Fontana Steal 4396,500.00 10-19-62 8-14-63 $391.533.00
J-BA PUMPS, DRIVES AND MOTORS 8.17.62 Carollo $260,000 Johnston Pump $182,655.20 a-22.62 3.17.64 $182,665.20
J-6B BARSCREENS AND BELT CONVEYORS 8-17-62 Carollo $43,000 Jeffrey Mfg. 917,579.00 8-22.62 7-10-63 017,579.00
J-BC 72-INCH PROPELLER METER 8-17-62 Carollo $4,500 Measure-Rita Badger Meter $3,151.20 8-22.62 5.8.63 $3,151.20
J-BD SINGLE CIRCUIT 5000 KVA SUBSTATION 8-17-62 Carollo $32,000 Gap aral Electric $24,877.00 8.22.62 6-12-63 $25,757.11
J-6E 24M VOLT MOTOR CONTROL CENTER 8-17-82 Carollo $55,000 Allis Chalmers $34,944.00 8.22.62 410-63 $34,944.00
J-6.1 ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT
OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION 9-5-74 Cerullo $1,390,000 White Superior $1,678,100.00 ALL BIDS REJECTED(10.18.74)--PROJECT
DIVIDED INTO SCHEDULES A. B AND C
(FORCE ACCOUNT) SEE BELOW
J-6-1A SCHEDULE A: GAS ENGINES 1.21-75 OCSD $596,000 White Superior $588,342.62 2.19-75 9-8-76 $556,580.00
J-6.1B SCHEDULES RIGHT ANGLE DRIVES
AND PUMPS 6.3.76 OCSD 4314,358 McCella St... $345,000.00 6-11-75 9-8-76 0356,958.92
J-6-1C SCHEDOLE C: TILTING DISC CHECK
VALVES 7-22-75 OCSD $72.000 Valves&Primer $68,480.24 8-13-75 6.9.76 $68,480.24
J-e-ID INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL PUMPING
FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL
PUMPING STATION 9-7-76 OCSD 0300,000 Skipper&Co. $341,791.00 9-8.76 11.9.77 $294,085.00
J-6-1 E NEW ROOF HATCHES AT OCEAN
OUTFALL PUMPING STATION 12-1-77 OCSD $25,000 Johnson Steel $25.000 11-9.77 4.12-78 $24,300.00
J-6.11' DIGESTER GAS PIPING SYSTEM AT
OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION 12-18.78 OCSD 417,500 Canaries Inc. $20.467.00 12-13-78 3-14-79 $22,111.24
Joint Works-Page 2
It [ L [ l [ l [ [ [ [ [ 1 l t I ! [ [
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT.
J-8-1G SHEET METAL FOR ROOFING AT OCEAN
OUTFALL PUMPING STATION 12.28-78 OCSD $13.500 Terdiff Sheet Metal 86,676.00 1-10-79 9-6-79 $5,676.00
J-6.2 ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY FACILITIES
AT PLANT NO.2 11.28.85 Cerollo 02,250,000 Kiewit Pacific $1,838,000.00 12-11-85 12.20.87 $2,141,194.39
Eouioment Purchases in for J-6-2 (end P1-22)
J-6-2A PRE-PURCHASE 3 GENERATORS
(4 FOR P1-221 10-16.85 Cerollo $1,420,000 Power System. $781,126.00 10.16-85 5.31.86 0764,313.85
J-6-2B PRE-PURCHASE 4 TRANSFORMERS
(6 FOR P1.22) 10-16-85 Cerollo 8180,000 GE Supply Co. 11138,883.00 10-16-85 12-29-87 $138,883.00
J-6-2C PRE-PURCHASE SWITCHGEAR FOR
BOTH JOBS 10-16.85 Carols 6610,000 Westinghouse $612,799.00 10-16-BS 11-6-87 0608,674.00
J-7 OFFICE BUILDING 7-3-63 Jordan& $135,834.00 J.Rey Construction 0134,848.00 7-10-63 5-13-64 8135,697.82
Ensley
J-7-1 ALTERATIONS TO ADMINISTRATION
OFFICES 7-2-68 OCSD 98.ODD Gentoei Bros. 614,824.00 8-14-64 11-13-68 014,616.60
J-7-2 ADMINISTRATION--ENGINEERING BLDG.ADDITION (See J-12)
J-7-3 ADMINISTRATION.-ENGINEERING BLDG.
ADDITION AND REMODEL 10-12-76 ALL BIDS REJECTED (11.10-761 --TO BE CONSTRUCTED UNDER FORCE ACCOUNT--see fallowing three lobs
J-7-3A-1 HEATING, AIR CONDITIONING AND
PLUMBING FOR ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING REMODEL 12-21-76 OCSD $24,000 Campbell Heating $36,100.00 12-19.76/GM 9.14.77 911,115.24
J.7.3A-2 PLUMBING FOR ADMINISTRATION AND
ENGINEERING BUILDING REMODEL 12.21.76 OCSD $14,000 Pacific Plumbing $10,780.00 1-1477/GM 8.10.77 $10,780.00
J-7-38 REPLACEMENT OF AIR CONDITIONING
FOR ADMINISTRATION AND
ENGINEERING BLDG. 2-23-78 OCSD 660,000 Campbell Heating $63,300.00 3-8-78/GM 6-13-79 $64,218.00
J-7.4 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION Pulaski &
AT PLANT NO. 1 5.24.88 Adis $4,000.000 J. R.Roberts Corp. $3,549,000.00 6-8-88 4.8.92 $4,908.114.00
J-7-5 MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING ADMINISTRATION Pulaski&
BUILDING Adte
FURNISHINGS: Office Pavilions $938,441.00 6-8-88 (Purchase Order Contract)
TELEPHONE SYSTEM EXPANSION: Centel $49,000 7.13-88 (Purchase Order Convect)
SECURITY SYSTEM: Security Specialists $10,116.00 (Purchase Order Contract)
Joint Work.- Page 3
[ I t t : t [ t t t t t [ t t t ! t t , t
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
J-7-5-1 PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF
INTERIOR OFFICE PARTITIONING
AND FURNISHINGS TO RECONFIGURE
AND EXPAND THE FINANCE AND
ACCOUNTING OFFICES OCSD $100,000 (Purchase Order Contract to Office Pavilions-478,935.63)
J-8 INSTALLATION OF 12 KV SWITCHING
CENTER 4.3.63 Carollo $12,000 Ymba Linde El... $14,907.00 4-10-63 8-14.63 $15,020.00
J-8A 12 KV SWITCHING CENTER 2-1-63 Cerollo $20,000 Allis Chalmers $16.303.00 2.13-63 9-10-63 $16.303.00
J-89 12 KV SERVICE ENTRANCE EQUIPMENT 7-3-63 Cerollo $7,500 Gough Ind. $6,590.00 7-10-63 3.11-64 46,590.00
J-BC 12 KV SWITCHING CENTER ADDITIONS 6-3-64 Carols $7,000 Allis Chalmers $7,228.00 6.10.64 12-9-64 $5,028.00
J-9 OCEAN OUTFALL NO.2--LAND SECTION 5.11-66 Cerollo $1,075,000 Vmmdl corporation 111,118,000.00 5-11-66 7-12-67 $1,118,000.00
J-9-1 METER VAULT ON OCEAN OUTFALL NO.2
(Federal Grant No.C-06.0649) 10.8-70 Cerollo $17,500 Wesco Engrg.&Cons[. 06.048.00 10-14-70 12-9-70 $6.048.00
J-9-2 SURGE TOWER NO. 2 EXTENSION AT
TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 2.3-76 Carolle $115,000 F.T. Meberth $73,000.00 2-17-76 9-8-76 $73.000.00
J-10 OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2—MARINE
SECTION 10.9-68 Cerollo $15,150,000 Peter Kiewit Sans $8,949,000.00 12-2-68 8-11-71 68,938,396.07
J-11 LABORATORY BUILDING AT PLANT
NO. 1 5-22-70 Picker $228,216 Neer-Cel Corp. $222,696.00 5-26-70 8-11-71 $229,209.74
J-11A PURCHASE OF LABORATORY EQUIPMENT
(Purchase Order No. 16209) ,6-5-70 OCSD Van Waters&Rogers $8,594.46 6-10-70 4-14-71 $8.594.46
J-11B PURCHASE OF LABORATORY
EQUIPMENT I2 GASCHROMATOGRAPHS
A AND B(PO# 16210) 6.5.70 OCSD Hewlett Packard $12,366.86 6-10-70 4-14-71 $12,366.86
J-11C PURCHASE OF ATOMIC ABSORPTION
UNIT(POA 1B211) 6-5-70 OCSD Perkin-Elmer 511,069.63 6.10-70 414-71 $11,069.63
J-11R REPLACEMENT CHILLER PACKAGE FOR
LABORATORY AIR CONDITIONER 5-29-84 OCSD $30,000 Pacific Mechanical $28,647.00 413-84 2-13.85 $29,292.00
J-11.1 DEMOLITION OF LABORATORY AT PLANT NO. 1
(Admin.Anne.to be constructed on sits-- Brown/
see J-30) Caldwell
Joint Works-Page 4
[ [ l [ [ ! [ [ [ [ I [ 1 [ [ : I [ [ [ i
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
J-12&
J-7.2 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES
(Federal Grant No.C-06-0573f Ficker $467,950 B.Miller Coned. $498.880.14
J-13 SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE BLDG.,
PLANT 3-6.73 Fick., $810,000 J.Rey Construction $1,119,712.00 5-2-73 8-14-74 $1,091,652.60
J-13-1 SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE SEWER
LATERAL 12-1-77 OCSD $10,000 A&T Construction 012,895.00 12-14-77 4.11-78 $12,895.00
J-13-2 WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION 6-13-78 Miyake/
Lien-Woad $175,000 ALL BIDS REJECTED 47-14.781 TO BE REBID ON 9-5-79 (St.J.13.2(Rebidf
J-13-2 WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION 9-5-79 Miyeke-
(Rebidl Lain-Wood $175,000 Coy Atkin. $199,000 9-13.79/GM 5.14-80 $201,887.75
J-14 JOB/NUMBER DELETED
J-15 OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER
STATION"C" AT PLANT NO. 2 5-28-87 Carollo $28,000,000 Advenco Constructors $18,476,243.00 6-10-87 3-14.90 019,580,790.75
J-15A PREPURCHASE AND INSTALLATION
OF VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE
SYSTEMS AND PUMPS 6-3-86 Carollo 55,400,000 General Electric $4,025,440.00 6-11-86 1-12-94 $3,819,423.53
J-15B-1 PURCHASE AND INSTALL ULTRASONIC
FLOWMETER FOR OCEAN OUTFALL Carollo Purchase Order Cont.No. 24023 with Sperling Instruments $41,700.00
J-158-2 VAULTS FOR ULTRASONIC FLOWMETER
FOR OCEAN OUTFALL 8-26.86 Carollo $150,000 Kiewit Pacific $164,003.00 8-13-86 2-11-87 $212,523.33
J-15-1 RAISING SURGE TOWER NO. 20N
OCEAN OUTFALL 9.23.86 Carollo 02,300,000 Adyenco Constructors $1,933,085.00 10.29.86 3.24-88 $2,044,288.10
J-16 LIGHTING CONSERVATION FACILITIES
AT PLANTS 1 AND 2 3-1-88 Boyle $400,000 Pacific Electric $538,000.00 3-9-88 5-10-89 $581,398.00
J-17 CENTRAL LABORATORY 11-29-88 Boyle $4,000,00 J.R. Roberta Corp. $7,090,000.00 12.13.89 8.14-92 $8,153,002.07
J-17.1 FURNISHING OF NEW MOLECULAR MICRO-
BIOLOGY LABORATORY OCSD Purchase order contract.
Joint Works-Page 5
I t I t : I 1 It I I I t i 1 t [ t 1 t
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
J-17-2 CENTRAL LABORATORY ELECTRICAL
UPGRADES,AND TEST PLUG
INSTALLATION AT PLANTS 1 AND 2
(Bid with p1-36-1 of el) OCSD Adyanc0 $75,001.00 12-8-93
J-18 INSTRUMENTATION IMPROVEMENTS
(Replaced by Job No.P240.-sea that line item)
J-19 CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS Brown&
(Prima Number) Design Caldwell $51,000.000
J-19-1 CENTRAL POWER GENERATION Brown Is
SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 11-6-90 Caldwell 916,000.000 Hunter Corporation $15,410,855.00 12-12-90 2.9.94 $17.112,767.00
J-19-2 CENTRAL POWER GENERATION Brown&
SYSTEM AT PLANT NO.2 1-3040 Caldwell $20,000,000 Brinderson Corp. $19,753,000.00 2-14-90
J-19A PREPURCHASE ENGINES FOR
CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS
AT BOTH PLANTS Brown&
INagotiatad purchase contract) Caldwell 920,000,000 Cooper Industries 918,968,113.00 $21,011,395.00
J-20 WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE
BUILDING, AND OIL STORAGE AND Pulaski&
DISPENSING IMPROVEMENTS 12-20.88 Arita 92,000,000 J. R.Roberts Corp. $3,266,000.00 2-8-89 11-14.90 $3,712,875.44
J-21 REPLACEMENT OF WASTE DIGESTER
GAS FLARES AT PLANT NO. 1 I1-6-90 OCSD Advance Constructors 6400,001.00 12-12.90 1-13-93 $440,793.00
J-22 REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF
STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL Design
J-22-1 REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF
STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL
1portion under Pacific Coast Hwy.)
(Cooperative project with CALTRANS as
part of Santa Ana River Widening Moffit and
project) Nichols 92,000,000 Rados(Under contract with CALTRANSI
J-22-2 REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF
STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL
(portion from P2 southerly line
to Ocean Outfall Booster Station)
(Combined with 1-8 for construction) 7-2-91 Carollo Colich&Sons $1,320,000.00 7.17-91 12-8.93 $1,350,526.00
Joint Works-Page 6
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
J-23-1 CONTROL CENTER/OPERATIONS AND Brown and
MAINTENANCE BUILDING (bid w/P2-44) 1-22-91 Caldwell $3,200,000 J.R.Roberta Corp. 43,675,000.00 2-13-91 3.10-93 $3,828,428.00
J-23-2 PLANT 1 CONTROL CENTER
INSTRUMENTATION 5.21-91 EMA Serv32,500,000 HBO Technology $1,795,000.00 7.17-91
J-24 INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT
INFLUENT METERS 1.23-90 Wllldan $250.000 P. R. Burka Industrial 8214,464.00 2-14-90 2.27.90 $236,194.81
J-24A PREPURCHASE ELEVEN FISCHER
PORTER METERS
(Purchase Order Contract) Fischer and Porter 9170,736.00 12-14.88
J-248 REHABILITATION OF SIX EXISTING
KROHNE METERS
IPumhase Order Conttactl Krohne America 133,136.00
J-26-1 COMPUTERIZED FACILITIES' RECORD
AND DRAWING SYSTEM Black and
Phase 1--Needs Assessment Veatch
Phase 11--Computer System Acquisition
Phase III--System Development
J-25-2 POWER STUDIES FOR PLANTS
NOS. 1 AND 2
J-26 NEW PERSONNEL BUILDING AT PLANT 1 $1,900,000
J-27 DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF Brown and
SUPPORT BUILDINGS AT PLANT NO. 2 Caldwell $700,000
J-28 PUMP STATION TELEMETRY AND
MONITORING SYSTEM UPGRADE 9-4-92 OCSO $400,000 Domar Elec. $374,100.00 TALL BIOS REJECTEDI
J-28 PUMP STATION TELEMETRY AND
(Rabid) MONITORINGSYSTEM UPGRADE 1.12.93 OCSD $400,000 Soffe Electric 9312.000.00 2.10.93
J-29 TECHITE PIPE CLAIM
(Special Counsel,Investigation and testing)
J-30 ADMINISTRATION ANNEX AT PLANT
NO. 1
Joint Works- Page 7
B [ B H I [ l l I I I [ fl [ l l I l I
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
J-31 EXPANSION OF EXISTING
COMPUTERIZED MONITORING AND
CONTROL SYSTEMS AT PLANTS
1 AND 2
J-32 FINAL EFFLUENT SAMPLER SYSTEM AT
PLANT NO. 2 5-18-93 Lee&Ro $210,000 Pascal&Ludwig $202,579.00 6.9-93
J-33 STANDBY POWER RELIABILITY AND
MODIFICATIONS Carollo
J-33-1
J-34 OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY
UPGRADES Carollo
Joint Works-Page 8
REVISION DATE: W94
PLANT CONTRACTS
PLANT NO. 1
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
P14 Primary Sedimentation Basin Additions
for Plant No. 1 12-5-56 Carollo Weardo Const. $227,037.37 12-7-56 7-10-57 $296,161.52
Pl-IA Mechanical Clarifier Equipment B-10-58 Carollo Process Engrs. $41,397.00 8-10-56 3-13.57 $41,397.00
Pt-1R-1 and Remodel Sedimentation Basins 3&4,
P2-1R-1 Plant 1 and Sedimentation Basins A. B
and C. Plant 2 6-8.71 Cerullo d275,000 F.T.2iebarth 6249,700.00 1-28.71 5-10-72 $256,622.50
Pt-2 Digester Addition to Plant No. 1 10-10.58 Carollo 4294,000 F.J.Early Jr. $265,511.00 10.10-58 5.13-59 $269.090.65
P1.3 Headworks Addition to Plant No. 1• 7-14-58 Carols $633,000 F.J.Early Jr.• $815,960.00 7.15-58 5-13.55 $628,286.15
Sewage Pumping Equip.for Plant No. 1•• Firi blinks Morse'
Sewage Metering Equip.for Plant No. 1... Foxboro Co.
P1.3.1 Odor Control and Improved Influent
Screening F..at Rec.Plant No. 1
(Fad.Grant No.C-06-0649) 10-541 Carollo. $115,000 F.T.Zmbeth $108,400.00 10.13-71 7.12.72 $110.105.00
PI-3-2 Hydraulic Reliability Improvements at
Rec.Plant No. 1 4-8-80 Lee a& Ro $1,200,000 Equinox-Malibu $1.328,000.00 4.9-80 3-10.82 $1,350,425.98
P1.4 Construction of Office Building
Addition,Warehouse Addition, and Monteith&
Now Vehicle Storage Building 5.19-61 Strickland 6127,000 Harris& Danner $102,642.00 6.14-61 11-18-61 0104,923.29
P1.5 Digester No. 6 and Miscellaneous
Improvements at Plant No. 1 8-16:61 Cerullo $587,548 D.N.I.Constr. P553,096.50 8-18-61 7.11-62 $559,466.04
PI-6 Electrical Remodeling at Plant No. 1 3-19.62 Carollo 664,300 Steiny/Mitchell 042,600.00 3-28-62 8-8-62 $46,358.00
P1-6.1 Power Reliability at Rec.Rent No. 1
(Fed.Grant No.C-O"649) 7.6-71 Carol. $130,000 Freeman Elec. $155.320.00 7-14-71 2-9.72 $163.298.00
P1.6.1 A 1000 KVA Pad Mount Transformers
for Plant No. 1 (Fed.Grant No. General Else.
C-05-0649) 1.5-71 Cerullo 885,OW Supply $61,472.25 1.13-71 11.10-71 061,472.25
PLANT 1 - PAGE 1
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
P1-7.1 end Sludge Dewatering Facilities at
P2-6.1 Plants I and 2 12.7-62 Carallo $118,000 Bovie&Crail 4106,376.00 12-2.62 5-8.63 4109,383.00
PI-7A Sludge Centrifuge for Plant No. 1 5.11-62 Carollo $44,000 Bird Machine 445,308.00 6-8-62 2-4-63 045,306.00
PI-78 Sludge Centrifuge for Plant No. 1,
Unit N2 7-3-63 Carollo $42,000 Bird Machine 042,851.00 7-10-63 12-31-63 442,851.00
PI.7C Motor Control Center for Centrifuges 7.3-63 Carollo $3,500 Grayber Elec. $2,784.08 7-10.63 1-7.64 $2,784.08
P1-7-2 Phase It,Sludge Dewatering Fac. 1-22-64 Carollo $189,000 J. Putnam Haack $182,623.00 2-5-64 11-12-64 $183,026.11
PI-S Engine-Generator No. 1, Plant No. 1 1-463 Carollo $150.000 West&Wiggs 029,899.00 1.7.63 11-13-63 $91,821.88
P1-9 Secondary Treatment, Plant No. 1,
Phase 8.23-63 Carollo $2,076,000 J.Putnam Haack $1.784,569.00 9-11-63 10-14.64 $1,813,172.95
P1-9-1 Additional Secondary Treatment at
Reclamation Plant No. 1 9-26-72 Carollo $700.000 Hoagland&Hoagland $786,300.00 10.11.72 3.13.74 $825,786.01
1`1-10 Incinerator at Plant No. 1 4-3-63 Carollo 418,000 Smith Engrg. $12,928.00 4-10-63 8-14-63 $12,928.00
PI-11 Primary Clarifier No. 5 11-7-63 Carollo $232,000 Kemper/Hoagland 4216,340.00 11-13-63 6-10-64 $216,982.60
P1-12 Site Improvements at Plant No. 1 9-26-63 OCSD $27,865 R.McClelland $28,240.00 10-9-63 2-13.64 $29,126.20
P1-12-1 Site Improvements at Plant No. 1,
Phase ll 10-7-64 OCSD $32,500 R.McCLellend 429,726.60 10.14-64 3-11-65 $32,996.71
P1.12-2 Site Improvements at Plant No. 1,
Ph...III 2-1-67 OCSD $25,000 Sully-Miller $17,873.00 2-8.67 4-12-67 $18,768.55
P1.12-3 Fence and Entrance Revisions at
Plant No. 1 2.28.67 BIDS REJECTED
P1.12.4 Addition to Entrance and Fencing 6-23-70 OCSO $11,938 J.Tiedemann $8,938.00 6-23.70 9-10-70 $8,938.00
P1-12.5 Modifications of Parking Facilities for
Administration Building 3-3-71 OCSD $15,000 Sully-Miller 012,577.50 3-10-71 6-9-71 $13.102.60
PIA 2-5A Area Lighting for Administration General Else.
Building Perking Facilities 11.8-71 OCSD 42,582 Supply $2,284.80 11-8-71 11-11-71 $2,284.80
PLANT 1 - PAGE 2
[ [ I I l
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
Pt-13 ed
P2-10 Grit Hoppers 3.10-65 OCSD 862,000 West&Wiggs $69,969.00 3-10-65 I1-10-65 $74,548.78
P1-14 Digester No.8 at Plant No. 1 5-21-69 Carollo $425,000 Lomar Corp. 6329,400.00 S-27-69 8-12-70 $329,904.43
P1-15 ad
P2-15 Digester Solids Dawatering Facilities 3.20-70 Cerullo $825,000 Hood Corp. $767,522.00 4-8-70 8-11-71 $768,666.00
P1-15A and
P2-15A Purchase of Centrifuge Equipment 9-10-69 Caro110 $350,000 Bird Machine $336,790.00 9-10-69 12-9-70 $336,790.00
P1-16 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment
at Roc. Rent No. 1 Donovan Const.
IF".Grant No.C-06-0779-010f 4-17-74 Carollo 026.250,000 of Minnesota $29,876,000.00 6.12.74 1.11-78 $30,139,295.69
P1-17 Under-Drain System for Digester
Cleaning Reds at Rec. Rent No. 1 5-1-79 OCSD $425,000 Tried Mechanical $487,784.00 5.9-79 12-12-79 $489.958.62
P1-18 Sludge System Improvements at Hoagland/
Reclemab.n Plant No. 1 11-20-80 Lee&go $1,850,000 Artukovich 61,592,000.00 12-10-80 4-1492 61,470,460.00
P7-19 Construction of Bait Filter Press
Facility at Rec. Plant No. 1 7-28-81 Montgomery $1.900,000 Waltlingar Corp. 61,847,220.00 8-12-81 12-8-82 $1,947,031.08
PI.19-1 Construction of Containment Facility
at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Phase 1 CONSTRUCTION CANCELLED
P1-19-2 Construction of Containment Facility
at Reclamation Plant No. 1 1.11-83 OCSD $25,000 A.F.Smith 618,942.00 1-12-83 4-13-83 $19,696.18
P1-19-3 Construction of Conuument Facility
at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Phase III CONSTRUCTION CANCELLED
P1-19-4 Replacement of an Existing 8-inch
Plant Water Line with a new 12-inch
Ductile Iron Pipe (Purchase Orders) 5.17-83 OCSD None Dorado Ent. 08,464.00 5-11-83 7-28-83 $8,464.00
P1-19-5 Ventilation Improvements at Plant 1
Dawatering Facilities CANCELLED 10-18-94
P1.20 Headworks No. 2 at Plant No, 1
(Includes Job No.P1.31 f 8-4-87 Carollo $33,000,000 Kiewit Pacific 631,458,000 B-12-87 7-11-90 $33,890,078.03
PLANT 1 -PAGE 3
[ I [ a 9 [ [ S a a 1 a A ! a [ l II 1 [
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMP. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
P7-21 Installation of Replacement Belt
Filter Presses at Plant No. 1 5.28-85 Corolla $5,000,000 Margate Const. 64,618,000.00 12-11.85 0.9-88 $4,831,615.18
P1-22 Electrical Reliability,at Plant No. 1 Corolla 04,600,000 Pinner Corot (Withdrew bid)
P1-22 Electrical Reliability at Plant
(Rebidl No. 1 11.13-85 Corolla $4,600,000 Margate Const. 23,643,600.00 12-11-85 1-29-88 23,948,958.51
PI-22A Prepurchase of Four Generators Power Systems
at Plant No. 1 (with Job No.J-6-2A) 10-16-85 Carollo PO Contract Associates $781,126.00 10-16-85 5.31-86 $764,313.85
PI-225 Prepurchase of Six Transformers
at Plant No. 1 (with Job No.J-6-281 10-16-85 Corolla PO Contract General Electric $138,883.00 10-16-85 12-9-87 $138,883.00
Pl-22C Prepurchase of Switchgeor at
Plant No. 1 (with Job No.J-6-2C) 10-16-85 Carollo PO Contract Westinghouse S612.799.00 10-16.85 12-9-87 $608.674.00
P1.22-1 Power and Communications Service
for Support Bldgs.at Roc.Plant
No. 1 9.23.86 Carollo 6350,000 Comer Electric 0187,905.00 10-29-86 4-8-87 $187.905.00
PI-23R Replacement of Primary Basins
1 and 2 at Plant No. 1 B-26-86 Lea&Its 113,500,00<) S.A.Healy Co. 84,443,520.70 9-10 86 2.15.89 $5.044,264.40
PI-24R Rehabilitation of Primary Basin.
3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1 12-19.85 Lee&Ro $1,900,000 Advanco Const. 92,221,961.00 1.30.88 12.5.86 12,510,625.98
P1-25 Covers for Primary Basins 3,4 and Malcolm
5 at Plant No. 1 8-25-87 Pirnie Advanco Const 2940,001.00 9.9.87 2-10-90 $941,314.39
P1-26 Foul Air Scrubber System at Malcolm
Plant No. 1 8.25:87 Pirnie Advanco Const. S1,713,000.00 9-9-87 2-10-90 $1,889.884.74
P7-27 Entrance., Landscaping,Security
and Interior Road Improvements at
Plant No. l B-16-88 Boyle $1,600,000 Kiewit Pacific $1,590,000.00 10-12-88 11-8-89 21,689,643.73
(Negotiated with Klewit after rejecting the one bid submitted as too high)
P1-27-1 Wearohauler Sampling System at
Plant No. 1 9.19.89 TOPS 0125,000 Schuler Engrg. $194,344.00 11-8-89 3-13-91 S203,250.OD
P1-27-2 Waetahauler Pump Station at Plant
No. 1 9-19-89 IWS $140,000 Schuler Engrg. 0979,790.00 11-8-89 3-13-91 $1,016,616.68
P1-27-2-1 Modification of Weateheuler Pump
Station
PLANT 1 - PAGE 4
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT.
P1-28 Advanced Primary Treatment
Chemical Addition Facilities Ziebenh and
at Plant No. 1 (Bid with P2-36) 9-25-86 OCSD $400,000 Alper 4910,11DO.00 10.29.86 7-14-87 $977,242.00
Pt-29 Repair of Primary Effluent Line at
Reclamation Plant No. 1 8-12.86 Lea&go $200,000 Margate Constr. 0156,400.00 8.13-86 10-31-86 $168,867.00
PI.30 Miscellaneous Peeing at
Reclamation Plant No. 1
(Replaces PW-1511 12.2-86 OCSD 8601000 R.J. Noble $43,440.10 12-10.86 2.18-87 $53,933.88
P1-31 Otunditien of Digesters 1, 2 end 4;
Replacement of Roger,Piping
Cleanouta;and Grading and
Paving at Plant No. 1 (Combined with Job No.P1-20 for construction)
P1-32 Modification.and Improvement of
IW Field Office,Rent No. 1 PO OCSD (Force Account Work)
P1-33 Primary Clarifiers Noe.6.15 and
Related Facilities at Reclamation
Plant No. 1 9.19-89 Lee&Re 646,000,000 Gust Newberg 839,657,000.00 10.11-89 6-10-92 $42,280,663.33
Pl-33-1 Stiffeners for Primary Clarifiers Nos.
6-15 Effluent Launder. 12-29-92 OCSD 8125,0DD S.S. Mechanical $39,572.00 1.13-93 7.14-93 $39,572.00
PI-34 Digesters Nos. 11-16,Sludge and Gee
Handling Facilities at Reclamation
Rant No. i Design Only Carollo
P1-34.1 Gas Handling Facilities at Plant No. 1 12-19-89 Carollo $16,000.000 Ziebanh&Alper $13,098,000.00 1-10-90 9-12.92 $13.689,820.70
P1-34.2 Sludge Handling Facilities at Plant
No. 1 5.23.89 Carollo 622,400,000 Advanco 819,085,600.00 7.12.89 11.13-91 $20,150,573.85
PI.34-3 Construction of Digester.Nos. 11-16
at Rae.Plant No. 1 (combined with
P1-35.2 and J-21 for construction) 11.6.90 Carollo $30,000,000 Advance $23,225,376.00 12.12.90 1-13.93 $24,387,300.54
P1-35 Rehabilitation of Digesters 7,8,9 Brown and
and 10 at Rae.Plant No. I Design Only Caldwell
PLANT 1 -PAGE 5
i [ � e x � t � ► l [ c l t t e I e � t a e � fi
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMf. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT.
P1-35-1 Rehabilitation of Digester.7 and 8 Brown and
at Rec.Plant No. 1 2-21-89 Caldwell 81,e00,000 S.A.Healy $2,530,072,00 3-8-89 a-8-90 $2,411,915.00
PI.35-1-1 Cleaning of Digesters 7 and 8 at Brown and
Rec. Plant No. 1 8-20-89 Caldwell 9250,000 Dorado Ent. $171,000.00 7-12-89 10.11-89 $171,000.00
P1-35.2 Rehabilitation of Digester.9 and Brown and
10 at Rec.Plant No. 1 11-8.90 Caldwell Advanco $3,180,000 12.12-90 1-13.93 $3,433,313.00
(bid with PI-34-3 AND J-21)
PI.36 Secondary Treatment Improvements
at Plant No. 1 (Prime Number) Carollo
P1-38-1 Electrification of Pump Drives at
Reclamation Plant No. 2 Corolla Advanco $1,200,001.00 12-8-93
(bid with PI.38-1, PI-38.4 and P2.43.2) (plus 857,500 for rock lin and outl and insurance)
P1-38-2 Secondary Treatment Improvements
at Plant No. 2 Corolla
PI-37 Primary Clarifiers Noe. 18-21 and Brown and
Related Facilities Caldwell
PI.38 Miscellaneous Improvements to
Fecilid..at Plant No. 1 Design Only Carollo
PI-38-1 Security and Landscaping Element
of Misc.Improvements to Fec.
at Plant No. 1 Ibid with PI-36-1,PI-38-4 and
P2.43-2 Carollo Adyando $1,020,000.00 12-8-93
P1.38.2 Priority Projects Element of Misc.
Improvements to Fec.at Plant No. 1 5.18.93 Lee and Ro $5.000.000 Pascal& Ludwig 93,384,800.00 6.9.93
PI-38-3 Seismic Study Element of Misc. Dame.and
Improvement.to Fec.at Plant No. 1 Moore
PI-38.4 Misc.Improvements to Fac.at Plant
No. 1 (bid with Pt-384,PI-38-1 and P2-43-2) Carollo Advanco $1,684,551.00 12-8.93
P1-38.5 Process Ara.Fire Protection and
Signage and Water Distribution
System Modification. Ide.lgned with
Job No.P2-48) Lee and R.
PLANT I -PAGE 6
1 a E a [ I I i & L a i 1 a
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
P1.39 Drainage Improvements at Plant 1 (Force Account Work)
PI-40 Facility and Utility Improvements at
Plant No. 1
PI-40-1 Modifications to Electrical and
Control Systems,and Process
Evaluation.at Plant No. 1
Pt-40-2 Facility Modifications and Safety
Upgrade.at Plant No. 1 Lea and Be
P1.41 Rehabilitation of Clarifier.3, 4 and 5
at Plant No. 1 Carollo
PI-42 Miscellaneous Improvements at
Plant No. 1 5-19.93 OCSD 1260.000 Pascal & Ludwig $235,900.00 6-9-93
P1-43 Seismic Retrofit of Non-Stmoturel
Systems at Plant No. 1
PI-44 Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1 Holmes and
Narver
P1-45 Recycled Water Treatment and
Distribution at Plant No. 1
P1-46 Chemical and Wasteheuler Facility Black and
Modifications at Plant No. 1 Veatch
PI-46.1 Plus..I Wasteheuler Dumping Facilities Black and
Modifications Veatch 5200,000 Dorado Enterprises $248,953.00 11-10-93
P1-47 12 KV Distribution System for Support
Facilities
P1-48 Miscellaneous Treatment Plant
Improvements at Plant No. 1
PI-49 Operation.and Maintenance Projects
PLANT 1 - PAGE 7
1 l [ [ [ [ I [ I [ [ [ I [ [ l [ 1 1
REVISION DATE: 3/94
PLANT CONTRACTS
PLANT NO,2
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
P2-1 Construction of Sewage Treatment
Plant 6-24-53 Carollo Early& Kiewit $874,875.00 7-22-53 5-26-54 $891,443.30
P2.2 Expansion of Plant No. 2 11-20.69 Carollo F.J.Early $864,515.00 12.9.59 7-26-60 $867,702.10
P2-2A 250 HP Horizontal Motor and Starter 12-3-64 Corolla $8,000 Graybar Else. $5,699.20 12-9-64 3-5-65 $5.699.20
P2-3 and Kemper and
J-4 Expansion of Plant No.2 8-2460 Corolla $553,000 Hoaglandfndley 0993,470.74 8-26-60 5-12-62 $1,018.279.20
P2-4 Steam Station Tunnels, Incineration
and Misc. Improvements at Plant No. 2 1.17-62 Corolla $329,295 W.wdo Const. 0335,045.00 1-29-62 10-10-62 $355,SU6.05
P2-5 Haadworks No. 2,Sedimentation
Basins F and G and Digesters F,G
and H 8-17-62 Carollo $1.773,000 Hoagland/Findlay $1,357.000.00 8-22-62 10.9-63 $1,358,701.53
P2-SA Two 200 HP Vertical Elea. Motors 1-8.62 Cerollo Fairbanks Morse $12.499.05 1-10-62 46-62 $12,499.05
P2-5B Engine Drive Unit 5.11.62 Carollo $30,000 Waukesha Motors $21.474.00 5-25-62 8-14-63 $21,474.00
P2-5C Raw Sewage Pumps and Gear
Reduction Units 8.17-62 Carollo $35.000 Worthington $34.194.00 8-22-62 45-63 $34.194.00
P2.5D Clarifier Equipment for Plant No.2 5-11-62 Carollo $50,000 Process Engrg. $33,624.12 5-25-62 8-14-63 $33,624.12
P2-SE Headworks Motor,Pump.Gearhead
end Starter 2-10-65 Carollo 631.000 Worthington $37,797.00 2-17-65 11-15-65 $37,797.00
P2-SR-1 Rehabilitation of Headwork.B at
Plant No. 2 8-14-70 Carollo $25,000 J&W Hoagland $33,220.00 8-17-70 3-10-71 $38,849.66
P2-SR-2 Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation
Basins F and G at Plant No.2 9-25-84 Lee and R. $980,000 Advance Constr. $783,464.00 10.10-84 6-11-86 $909,708.86
P2-6-1 and Sludge Dewalering Facilities at
PI-7-1 Plants Nos. 1 en! 2 12-7.62 Corolla $1113,000 Boo.&Crail $106,376.00 12-12-62 5-10-63 $109.383.00
P2-7 Turbine Generator Installation and
Building 3-10-64 Cerollo 0116,000 F.J. Early $232,250.00 3-11-64 1-13.65 $237,228.95
PLANT 2-PAGE 1
l ! [ [ [ [ It [ [ [ It [ [ [ l [ It [
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMf. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
P2.7A Turbine Generator Set No. 1 10-16-63 Carollo $255,000 Orenda, Inc. $230,373.00 1G-30-63 8-10-67 $221,512.52
P2.713 Steam Turbine Generator 6-3-64 Carollo $19,000 Deem-HilllPetemon- $16.943.00 6-10-64 412-65 $16.943.00
Boston
P2.7.1 Installation of Steam Turbine 11.5.64 Carollo $22.000 J.WaW Co. $28.738.00 11-12.64 6-9-65 $30.170.32
P2-8-1 Enclosures—Outfall Booster No. 1 11-3-55 Carollo $302.000 J Putnam Henck $307,203.00 11-10-65 10-13-66 $308,664.01
P2-8-2 Site Improvements.-Ph...II 2.28-67 OCSD $8,500 R.J.Noble $7,680.30 3-1-67 4-12.67 $8,055.69
P2-8-3 Enclosures--Phase II and Operator's
Building 12-10-68 Carollo $186,500 W.J. Burke $216,585.00 12-18-68 10-8-69 $218,408.80
P2-8-4 Site Improvements—Phase lit 11-24.69 OCSD $7,000 Griffith Co. $8,869.00 11-25.69 14470 $8,961.00
P2.8.5 Site Improvement—Phase IV 5-26-70 OCSD 025,000 KellµCorkell $16.849.00 5-13-70 7-8-70 $17.589.00
P2.8.6 Entry Well,Gates and Sign 6.19-70 Ficker $12,000 Neer-Cel $18,921.00 6-19-70 9-29-70 $18,921.00
P2-8-7 Plant No.2 Entry and Street Paving 6.19-70 OCSO $31,000 Sully-Miller $29,963.00 6.22-70 9-10-70 132,955.00
P2-8-8 Smokhurst Street Improvements 4-8-76 Forkert 0214,955 Fleming Constr. $141,441.10 4-14-76 8-11-76 $165.633.81
P2-8-9 Preparation of Grading and Drainage
Plan for Northerly Portion of Treatment
Plant No. 2 7.28.81 OCSD Forks"Engr. $14,000.00 10.14.81 4.14-82 $13,825.47
P2-9 Incinerator No. 2 10.16-63 Carollo $28.000 Dunnell Constr. $14,895.00 10.30.63 3.11.64 $14,895.00
P2.10 and
PI.13 Grit Hoppers(a..Page I- West 6 Wiggs
P2-11 Headwork.•C"--Plant 2 3.1.67 Carollo $2,475,OD0 J.Putnam Henck $2,495,961.00 3.8-67 12.10.69 $2,499.528.37
P2.11.1 Heedworks'C" Expansion at Plant
No.2(Fed.Grant C-06.0573) 9.1.71 Carollo $1,200,000 ETI/Kordick $1.228,000.00 4.10-74 $1,277,256.00
P2-12 Clarifier•H., 5-4-66 Carollo $328,000 J.Putnam Henck $247.518.00 5-11-66 4-12-67 $249.784.18
P2-13 and Bypass Facilities and Sedimentation
1.7.1 Basin Effluent Facilities (Sae Job No.1.7.1)
PLANT 2-PAGE 2
l t [ l [ t l [ 1 l l [ t [ l l [ [ [
3M4
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
P2-14 Sedimentation Basin-I',Digester'('
and Distribution Structure'B'at
Plant No. 2 4-30-69 Carollo $875,000 J&W Hoagland 0716.900.00 5-14-69 9-10-70 $721,550.93
P2-15 Digester Solid. Deweter ng Facilities
at Plant No.2, Phase II (Be.Job No.P1-15)
P2.15-1 Installation of Centrifuge at Treatment _
Plant No.2 9.12-78 Carollo $150,000 All Bide Rejected 9-13-78—to be Rabid
P2.15-1 Installation of New Centrifuge at
(REBID) Treatment Plant No.2 11-30-78 OCSD $150,000 All Bide Rejected 1-1-79—included in Job No.P2.24
P2-15-IA Electric Motor for New Bird HB-64,000
Centrifuge(See E-0881 3.30-78 OCSD 615,000 No Bide Received—GM negotiated NTE$14,000 contract with Bird Machinery
P2-16 Sedimentation Basin"J", Digester*J'
at Plant No. 2 3.6.70 Carolo $650,G00 J&W Hoagland $587.700.00 3-11-69 4-14-71 $600,019.10
P2.17 Sedimentation Basin'K' and Digester"It"
at Plant No.2(Fed.Grant C-06-0573) 2-17.71 Curcio $1,200,000 J.Putnam Hanck $1,164,S40.00 2-23-71 9-13.72 $1,199,440.00
P2-18 Effluent Screening Fee.at Plant No. 2 11.9-70 Carollo $70,000 Lynam-Wood $69,299.00 11.12.70 7-14.71 $69,299.00
P2-19 Sedimentation Basins'L"and 'M'and
Digesters"L"and 'M' at Plant No. 2
(Fed.Grant C-06-05731 5.18-71 Carollo $1,700,000 J&W Hoagland $1,383.000.00 6-9-71 9-13-72 $1,455,644.00
P2.20 Power Reliability Project at Plant
No. 2 (Fed.Grant C-06-0649) 6-15-72 Carollo $350.000 Gorham Elec. $158,294.00 8-9-72 6-11-75 $155.663.75
P2-21 Digester.'N" and"0" at Plant No. 2
(Fad.Grant C-06-0649) 11-20-72 Carollo $1,200,000 Hemisphere $1,068.413.00 12.13.72 10-18-74 $1,077,375.00
P2-23.1 75 MGO Improved Treatment at
Plant No. 2, Flood Wall and Site Carollo/
Development(Fed Grant Greeley and
C-06-1073.1101 3-24-77 Hansen $2,560,000 Pascal& Ludwig $2,268,420.00 5.3.77 5-10.79 $2.279,868.09
PLANT 2-PAGE 3
L I [ [ [ [ [ [ I I I L I H [ [ [ [ I
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
P2-23-2 Div. I Oxygen Generation and Storage
Facilities
Div.-2: Oxygen Dissolution Facilities
for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at
Plant No. 2(Fed.Grant Catalytic Inc.
C-06.1073-130-1) 7-28-77 Carollo $11,550,000 (Air Products) $8,273,000.00 9-22-77 5-13-81 $8.521,476.49
P2.23-3 Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD
Improved Treatment in Plant No. 2
(Fed.Grant C-06.1073-120) 5-10-77 Carollo $4,150,000 C.H.Leavell $2,999.000.00 6-8-77 5-9-79 $3,024,195.76
P2-23.5 Operations Center for 75 MGD
Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2
(Fed.Grant C-06-1073-110) 5-10-77 Carollo $1.150,000 Pascal&Ludwig $1,149,296.00 6-e-77 3-14-79 $1,251,970.35
P2-23-5.1 Operations Center Expansion at Brown and
Plant No.2 Caldwell
P2.23-5-1 Operations Center Expansion at Brown and
(Rebid No. 2) Plant No. 2 1.19.93 Caldwell $2,800,000 Jeveid Contractors $2,284,864.00 2-10-93
P2.23-6 Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved
Treatment at Plant No. 2 H.C.Smith (Operational)
(Fed.Grant C-06.1073-1401 10.20.77 Carollo $40,000,000 (Owl Constr.) $30,670,000.00 12-14-77 1-12-83 $32.566,756.64
P2-23-8-R1 Additional Waste Activated Sludge
Line Supports, Plant No. 2 1.10-83 OCSD Advance $13,465.00 1-12-83 3-9-83 $13.465.00
P2-24-1 Digestion end Wet Storage Facilities
for Solids Handling and Dewetering
Facilities at Plant No. 2
IFed.Grant C-06-1073-310) 11-20-79 Carollo $12,657,000 C. N.Peterson $13,350,000.00 12-12-79 7-14-82 $14,178.837.00
P2-24-IA Solids Transport and Processing
Equipment for Solids Handling
and Dewatedng Facilitites at
Plant No. 2
(Fed.Grant C-06-1073-320)
Schedule A: 4,000 Gallon
Water Truck 11.6-79 Carollo $45.000 Paramount Equip. $61,967.00 12-12-79 10-8-80 $61,867.00
Schedule S: Nine 3-axle Trucks 11-6.79 Carollo $405.000 Mack Trucks $453,995.24 12-12-79 10-8-80 $453,995.24
PLANT 2-PAGE 4
[ 1 I 1 [ 1 l [ [ t t l [ [ [ [ [ [
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
P2-24-1 B Solids Transport and Processing
Equipment for Solids Handling
and Dswetering Facilities at
Plant No. 2
(Fad. Grant C-06-1073-3201
Eight End-Dump Trailers 11-6-79 Carollo $240.000 Fruehauf Div. $278,076.16 12.12-79 10-8-80 $278,076.16
P2-24-IC Solids Transport and Processing
Equipment for Solids Handling
and Dowatering Facilities at
Plant No. 2
(Fed.Grant C-06-1073-320)
Schedule A: Composting Machine 11.6.79 Carollo $230,000 Eagle Crusher $178,118.80 12-12-79 10.9.80 $168,980.00
Schedule B: Elevating Scraper 11-6.79 Carollo $108.000 Shepherd Machinery $89.068.62 12-12.79 10-8-80 $89,068.62
Schedule C: Motor Grader 11-6-79 Carollo $110,000 Milo Equipment $89,768.22 12-12-79 10 8-80 $89.768.22
Schedule D: Front Loader Tractor 11.6.79 Carollo $135,000 Milo Equipment $111.286.22 12-12.79 10-8.80 0111,286.22
P2.42-2 Solids Handling Dowetedng and Dry
Storage Facilities at Treatment Plant
No.2 (Fed.Grant C-06.1073-3301 7-29.80 Carollo $13,600,000 C.N.Paterson $15,045,000.00 8.13.80 a-12-82 $16,117,778.00
P2-25-1 A Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant Hoagland/
No. 2(Basins) 10.27-81 Carollo $5.000.000 Anukovich $3.512,000.00 11.11-81 a-10.83 $4,023.629.00
P2.25-1 B Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant
No. 2 008-inch effluent line) 9-8-81 Carollo $500.000 J.Anukovich $343,000.00 9-9.81 5.12-82 $428,163.47
P2-25-2 Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at
Treatment Plant No. 2 6-7-83 Carollo $4,300,000 Advance $3,210,000.00 7.13.83 4-10-85 $3,303.864.73
P2-26 Primary Sedimentation Basins"P'
and 'O' at Plant No. 2 7.26-83 Carollo $3.500,000 Pascal&Ludwig $2,174.300.00 8.10.83 2-1386 $2,227.343.00
P2-27 Foul Air Scrubbers for Influent
Interceptors at Plant No. 2 11-23-82 Carollo $748,000 Advanco $710,436.00 12-8-82 2.2-84 $752.283.00
P2.28-1 Installation of Replacement Belt Kiswit PopiOc/ 62,960.000 Iwithdrew bid 12-31-85)
Filter Presses at Plant No. 2 12.31-85 Carollo $4.500,000 Lebanh&Alper $3,747.747.00 1.9-86 9-21-87 03,897,468.20
P2-28.3 Ventilation Improvements at Plant
No. 2 Solids Handling 10-30-84 Carollo 6300,000 Dean Chilton $384,900.00 11-14-84 2-13.86 $478,065.00
PLANT 2-PAGE 5
I [ a a a a a a [
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
P2.29 Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation
Basins"D' and"E"at Plant No.2 7-30-85 Lea&go 81,250,400 Advenco $944,383.00 8-14-86 9-10-86 $1,042,824.56
P2-30 Rehabilitation of Digesters "E"and Kennedy/
'H' at Plant No.2 9-23-86 Janke 41,600,000 2iebarth&Alper 01,374,800.00 10-29-86 12-1-87 $1,862.644.86
P2-31 R Rehabilitation of Primary Baeine"A',
'B', 'C', 'H', "I', "J", 'K', 'L"and*M" Morley,2iebarth
at Plant No.2 5-28-86 Lae& R. $4,000,000 and Alper,JV 92,433,500.00 6-11-as 7-26-87 $2,701.504.00
P2-32 Coven for Primary Basins, Plant No. 2 8-25-87 M.Pirnis Advance $5,100,000.00 9.9-87 2-10-90 $5,061,721.23
P2.33 Foul Air Scrubber Systembs at Plant
No. 2 8-25-87 M.Pinde Advance $5,965.000.00 9.9-87 2.10.90 $6.794,979.89
P2-34 Improvements to Grit Facility"B",
Billings Tunnel and Distribution
Structure'A" 8.26-87 M.Pirnia Advenco $1,722,000.00 9-9-87 2-10-90 $5,848,675.58
P2-35 Support Facilities Site and Security
Improvement.at Plant No. 2 Pulaski&
fMester Plan--Prime Numbed Adte
P2.35-1 Phase l lmp,.v.rmnta 44.88 P&A $1,200,000 Valley Crest 01,098,295.38 5.11-88 3-1-89 01,013,334.32
Landscaping
P2-35.2 Warehouse Building at Plant No. 2 Brown and
Caldwell
P2.35.3 Maintenance Building at Plant No.2 Brown and
Caldwell
1`2-35-4 Construction Management Offfice at Brown and
Plant No. 2 Caldwell
P2.35.5 Phase II Site and Security Improvements Brown and
at Plant No. 2 Caldwell
P2-36 Advanced Primary Treatment Chemical
Addition Facilities at Plant No. 2 7-29-85 OCSD 44001000 2iebarth&Alper 8910,000.00 9.25-86 7-14-87 $977,242.00
PLANT 2-PAGE 6
l I I I I I 1 1 I [ t [ I 1 I I I 1 1
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT.
P2.37 Miscellaneous Modifications and
Improvements to Facilities at Rent Brown and
No.2 9-27-88 Caldwell $7,500,000 Zlebanh&Alper $5,395,000.00 10-12.88 11-14.90 05,997,966.29
P2-38 Remodel Lobby of Control Center at
Plant No.2 OCSD Force Account Work
P2-39 Rehabilitation of Digesters I,J, K, L, M Brown and
N and O at Treatment Rent No. 2 Caldwell
P2-40 Instrumentation Improvements at Plant
No.2 4-18-89 LIMA Ent, $100,000 Fleming Engrg. (Asked to be relieved of bid.-will be rebid)
P2-40 Instrumentation Improvements at Plant
(REBID) No. 2(combined with R-033-1/-2 and
P1-27.1/.21 9-19-89 UMA $100,000 Schuler Engrg. $164,143.00 11-8-89 3-13-91 $164,143.00
P2-41 Primary Clarifiers R, S,T. U and
Related Facilities at Plant No.2
P2-42 Secondary Treatment Expansion at
Plant No. 2 (Prime Number) Design Cerollo
P2-42.1 Electrification of Pump Drives at
Treatment Plant No.2 Cerollo $16,000,000 Zieberth&Alper $9,369.000 1-9-91
P2-42-2 Secondary Treatment Expansion at
Plant No.2 3-23-93 Cerollo $22.000.000 Mergers Conti. $14,496,000 4-14-93
P2-43 Miscellaneous Improvements to Fec.
at Plant No. 2(Prime Number) Design Cerollo
P2.43-1 Priority Projects Element of Misc.
Improvements to Fac.at Plant No. 2 3.23-93 Carollo 64,800,000 Pascal&Ludwig $3,398,000 414-93
P2-43-2 Seismic Study Element of Misc. Dames&
Improvements to Fec.at Plant No.2 Moore
(Renumbered P2-53)
P2.43-3 Miscallaneouc Improvements to
Facilities at Plant No.2 Corolla
PLANT 2-PAGE 7
[ [ I I t I t I I I t l I I t I t t t
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMP.
P2-44 Replacement of Computerized
Monitoring System at Plant No.2 HIEO
(Combined with J-23-2 for coat,.) 5-21-91 EMA $3,000,000 Technology $1,957,000.00 7-17-91
P2-45 Abandonment and Removal of Oil
Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2
P2-45-1 Abandon Kimdw Oil Feld Lees. (Abandoned by Laws.)
P2-45-2 Abandon D.W.Elliot Oil Feld Leese (Abandoned by L....a)
P2-46 Process Area Fire Protection and
Signage and Water Distribution
System Modifications Lee and R. $4,350,000
P2.47 Facility and Utility Improvements at
Plant No. 2(Prima Number)
P2.47.1 Modification.to Electrical end
Control systems and Process
Evaluation at Plant No.2
P2-47-2 Facility Modifications and Safety
Upgrades at Plant No. 2 Lae and Be
P2-48 Rehabilitation of Clarifiers D through
0 at Rent No.2
P2-49 Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant
No. 2
P2-50 Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural
Systems at Rent No. 2
P2-51 Industrial Water Pipeline Extension
at Plant No. 2 7-13-93 Lee and Ro 5300,000 Amick Const. 9275,000 8-11-93
P2.52
P2.53 Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2 Holmes and
Newer
P2-53-1 Seismic Retrofit of Bend C Headwork.
PLANT 2- PAGE 8
[ I [ I [ I [ 1 ( 1 I - [ l A ( [ [ [ [
W94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTflACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE COW.AMf.
P2-54 Recycled Water Treatment and
Distribution at Plant No.2
P2-55 Chemical and Plant Water Facility Black and
MadiSoations Veatch
P2-59 Miacellanaous Seismic Modifications
and Rare Improvements at Plant
No. 2
P2-57 Operations and Maintenance Projects
PLANT 2-PAGE 9
[ l 1 1 [ [ [ I [ [ I ' I 1 I [ 1 [ I I
REVISION DATE: 3/90
PLANT CONTRACTS
PLANT NO,3
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
P3 WATER RECLAMATION PLANT NO.3
(Prime Number)
PLANT 3-PAGE 1
[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ t [ [ [ [ [ [ I . [ : [
REVISION DATE: 3/94
PLANT CONTRACTS
INTERPLANT PROJECTS
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
1-1 Ellis Avenue Trunk 4-22-53 Cerullo — J/N Adukovich $190,031.25 429.53 10.28.53 $189,249.00
1.1 R Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump
Station 3.30-78 Montgomery $305,099 Tried Mechanical $371,173.00 4-12-78 7-11-79 $390,564.00
I-1R-1 Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Force
Main 2.23-82 OCSD $950,000 Advance $533,323.00 3-10-82 11-10-82 6562.279.49
1-2 Bushard and Treatment Plant Trunk
Sewer. 4-22-53 OCSD — J/N Artukovich 5889,999.50 429-53 2-2454 $890.357.10
1-2R-1 Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, Adams
Avenue to Ellis Avenue, Phase 5-24-83 Hedge $587.000 George Miller $676,596.00 6-8-83 12-1483 $724,227.41
1-211.2 and Rehabilitation of Bushard Street Trunk
1-211-3 Phase 11, Adam.St.to Hamilton Ave.
(1-2R-21 and Phase 111,Hamilton Ave.
to'C' Headworks at Plant No. 2
(1-211-3) 2-28-84 Hedge $1,300,000 Sancon $942.496.00 3-14-84 11-1"4 $869,189.67
1-2R.2A Supplemental Repair of Gushers!Trunk.
Phase ll 10-30.84 Hodge $150.000 Thibodo Const. $220,000.00 11-14-84 4-10-85 $230,874.30
14 Effluent Discharge Facilities between
Plants Nos. 1 and 2 12-10-57 Cerullo $1,001,000 Webb&White $878,427.00 12-11-57 8-13-58 $877,927.00
I-4 Interplant Gas Transmission Line 3-9.W Cerollo $41.400 Pacific Pipe $33,900.00 3-26.60 5-11-60 $32.923.75
I-4-R Replacement of Interplant Gas Line 6-4-74 OCSD $150,000 Pacific Engrs. $98,161.70 6-12-74 9.11-74 $102.887.76
1.4.1 Ga.Storage Facilities 2-5-64 Cerollo $71,000 Pittsburgh-Des $54,290.00 2-13-64 7-8-64 $54.290.00
Moines Steel
1-4-1R Replacement of Gas Storage Facilities
atTreatment Plant.Nos. 1 and 2 10-5-76 OCSD $500,000 Pittaburgh-Des Moines
Steel $459,390.00 10-29-76 7-13-77 $460,902.66
I-4-2 Installation of Additional Compressors 4.6-66 Cerullo $175,000 Kemper/Hoagland $148,400.00 4-13.66 2-8-67 $149,825.60
Interplant-Page 1
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMP.
1.4-2A Digester Go.Compressors and Stoner 12-1-65 Carollo $75,000 Am.Compressor $69,612.40 12-8-65 5-6-66 $69,612.40
1-4-28 Digester Gas Compressor. 7.7-69 OCSD Nona Gas Pro.....re $20,882.40 7-9-67 7-6-70 $20,882.40
1.43 Installation of Gas Motoring Equipment
1-5 Tranmission and Control Line 8-16-61 Carollo $29,700 Shurr/Rnlay $33.985.00 8.18.61 12-13-61 $37,295.68
1-5-A Additional Supervisory Control Cable 5-1-63 Carollo $19,500 Ans..W.Wire $12,556.00 5-8-63 12-6-63 $12,558.00
1.5-1 Relocation of 12 KV and Control Line. 1-6-65 Carollo $40,000 ShurrfRnlay $47,224.00 1.13-65 413-66 $59,735.79
1-5-2 Control Cable 9.1-65 Carollo $62,500 Shurr/Finlay $44,021.00 9.8.65 4�13.66 $44,021.00
1-6-1 Addition to Plant No. 1 Effluent
Discharge Facilities Pipeline 2-10-GS Carollo $1,590.000 Vinnell Corp. $1,455,850.00 2-17.65 1.12-66 1,513,651.89
1-6.2 Addition to Plant No. I Effluent
Discharge Facilities-Structures e-2-65 Carollo 0173,000 Virmell Corp. $172,800.00 6-9-65 3-9.66 $174,698.22
1.7.1 and
P2-13 Bypass Facilities and Sedimentation
Basin Effluent Facilities 10-31-68 Carollo $235.000 P.Vukich $217,447.82 11-13-68 10-8-69 $218,179.32
1.7-2 Plant No. 1 Bypass Facilities at Plant
No. 1 1.21.69 Carollo $140,000 W. Hoagland $121,350.00 1-28-69 12-10-69 $123,756.54
1-7-3 Pump Station and Addition.to Bypass
Facilities at Plant No. 1 6.16.71 Carallo 0165,000 H.Tibbit. $142,478.00 6.29.71 5-10-72 $153,683.48
1.8 Interplant Influent Trunk Carollo&
1Fed Grant No.C-06.05731 8-24-71 Keith $7,505,499 Kordick/Radoe $6,387,511.00 9.30-71 1.10-73 $6,469,092.04
1-BR-1 Manhole Repair,Inteplant Influent
Interceptor 5-17-83 OCSD $14,000 Sancon Engrg. $14,000.00 6.8-83 9-14-83 $16,020.00
Interplant-Page 2
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TRLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
1-8-3 Influent Metering and Divmelun
Structure at Roe.Plant No. 1
(Fed.Grant No.C-06-06491 8-17-72 Cerogo 41,490,000 ETIMordick $1,290.000.00 9.13-72 249-75 91,511,457.75
1-9 Interplant Pipeline and Undlity Corridor
(Combined with J-22-2 for consl.) 7-2-91 Cerollo $44,200,000 Colich&Sons 020,008,600.00 7-17-91 12-8-93 1120,417,092.00
Interplant-Page 3
REVISION DATE: 3194
DISTRICT CONTRACTS
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS
'PW' CONTRACTS
CONTRACT FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT.
PW-001 SANDBLASTING &COATING
MECHANICAL CLARIFIER
EQUIPMENT AT PLANT NO. 1 5-5-61 E.Wagachall $27,000.00
PW-002 VOID
PW-003 VERTICAL LIFT DOORS AT JOINT
CHLORINATION STATION 10.26.61 Ferguson Door $9,340.00
PW-004 PERIMETER FENCE AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 1 10-26.61 Cyclone Fenc $ 9,959.40
PW-005 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING AT
TREATMENT PLANT NO. 1 11.22.61 BoacK Paving $ 2.400.00
PW-006 SLUDGE LINE ADDITION TO
TREATMENT PLANT NO. 11-25.62 Fewall Cone. $ 2,377.13
PW-007 REPAIR OF DIGESTER
'A' DOME 1-25-62 JohnsoMWestern $10,339.00
PW-008 SANDBLASTING OF DIGESTER
'C' DOME AT TREATMENT Td-County
PLANT NO.2 4.27-62 - Sandblasting $1,775.00
PW-009 DIRT FILL AT PLANT NO. 2 4-27-62 Bey Sierra $0.75& $ .85
PW-010 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING
ADDITIONS 5.24-62 Sully-Miller $ 9,200.00
PW-Ol l PERIMETER FENCE AT
TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 8-31-82 Cyclone Fence $ 7,569.00
PW-012 PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS
TO THE WESTSIDE PUMPING
STATION Stanford $1.941.50
PW-1
H I I I H 1
3/94
CONTRACT
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE 810 DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT.
PW-013 NORTH&WEST PERIMETER
FENCE AT TREATMENT PLANT
NO. 1 8-30-63 Crown Fence $5.850.50
PW-014 ADDITIONAL PAVING AT
TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 11-7.63 R.W.McClellan $35,765.00
PW-Ole GRAVEL ROADWAY-HEADWORKS
'C' AT PLANT NO. 2 2-11-69 SuIIY-Miller 9 3,780.00
PW-020 DIGESTER AND SURGE TOWER
SANDBLASTING AND EPDXY
COATING 5.5-65 Welker Coaling 8 3,676.00
PW-021 TERN SACTUARY ENCLOSURE 2.25-66 Crown Fence $1,779.00
PW-022 ASPHALT PAVING SEAL COAT
AT PLANT NO. 1 & 2 - 1970 8.28.70 Stanford Trk 4 5,670.00
PW-023 PLANT NO.2 BOILER REPAIRS 7.10-72 Porter Boiler 9 5,192.00
PW-024 CONTROL CENTER REPLACEMENT Tardiff Sheet
AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM 8.22.72 Metal/Air Con $5,695.00
PW-025 REWIND TWO 1000 KVA
TRANSFORMERS 3-7-73 Adva..a Elea. 8 5,940.90
PW-026 CHAIN LINK SECURITY FENCES
AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1
AND TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 4-24-73 Guardian Fence $17,238.00
PW-027 ODOR CONTROL SPRAYS AT
PLANT NO. 2 424.73 Diet Force. $22,000.00
PW-028 REBUILD NO. 4 ENGINE AT
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 4.24.73 Diet Force. 8 8,500.00
PW-029 REBUILD NO.9 ENGINE AT
PLANT NO. 2 4-24.73 Diet Force. 313,000.00
PW-030 REBUILD NO.4 BOOSTER
ENGINE AT PLANT NO.2 5.28.73 Diet Forces 513,800.00
PW-2
[ t [ [ [ [ , t It [ [ I [ [ It [ t [ [ [
3194
CONTRACT
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT.
PW-013 NORTH&WEST PERIMETER
FENCE AT TREATMENT PLANT
NO. 1 8-3043 Crown Fence $5.850.50
PW-014 ADDITIONAL PAVING AT
TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 11-7-63 R.W.McClellan $35.765.00
PW-016 GRAVEL ROADWAY-HEADWORKS
'C' AT PLANT NO.2 2-11.69 Sully-Miller $ 3,780.00
PW-020 DIGESTER AND SURGE TOWER
SANDBLASTING AND EPDXY
COATING 5-5-65 Welker Coating $3.676.00
PW-021 TERN SACTUARY ENCLOSURE 2-25-66 Crown Fence $1,779.00
PW-022 ASPHALT PAVING SEAL COAT
AT PLANT NO. 1 & 2 - 1970 8-28-70 Stanford Trk S 5,670.G0
PW-023 PLANT NO. 2 BOILER REPAIRS 7-10-72 Porter Boiler $ 5,192.00
PW-024 CONTROL CENTER REPLACEMENT Tardiff Sheet
AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM 8-22-72 - Metal/Air Con $5,695.00
PW-025 REWIND TWO 1000 KVA
TRANSFORMERS 3-7-73 Advance Else. It 5,940.90
PW-026 CHAIN LINK SECURITY FENCES
AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 _
AND TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 4.24.73 Guardian Fence 017,238.00
PW-027 ODOR CONTROL SPRAYS AT
PLANT NO.2 4-24.73 Dist Forces $22,000.00
PW-029 REBUILD NO.4 ENGINE AT
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 4-24.73 Dist Forces $ 8,500.00
PW-029 REBUILD NO.9 ENGINE AT
PLANT NO. 2 424-73 Dist Force. $13.000.00
PW-030 REBUILD NO.4 BOOSTER
ENGINE AT PLANT NO. 2 6.28-73 Dist Forces $13,800.00
PW-2
3/94
CONTRACT
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
PW-031 REBUILD NO. 1 ENGINE AT
PLANT NO. 1 9.5.73 Diet Forces 9 7,1 WOO
PW-032 RESOURCES MANAGEMENT CENTER
AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 11-7-73 OCSD 430,000 B&J Constr. 4 30,895.00 11-14.73 1.3.74 $ 30,895.00
PW-033 MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT
TREATMENT PLT NO. 2 12-8.73 OCSD Sully-Miller 015,522.00 12-12-73 5-24.74 $15,552.20
PW-034 VEHICLE FUELING FACILITIES
AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 12.6.73 Joe Key Daei9n $6,852.00 12-12-73 410.74 $5,650.00
PW-036 ADDITIONAL BOILER FACILITIES AT
PLT NO. 2 2.11.74 OCSD $50,000 Porter Bailer $35,673.00 2-13-74 6-11-75 $39,047.76
PW-038 REPAIR OF TWO GAS SPHERES AT
PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2 2-11-74 NO BIDS RECEIVED-GENERAL MANAGER AUTHORIZED TO APPROVE A PURCHASE ORDER is-12.74)
PW-037 REPLACEMENT OF GRIT
AUGERS AT PLANT NO. 1 &4.74 ALL BIDS REJECTED-WORK COMPLETED BY FORCE ACCOUNT 46-12.741
PW-039 CHAIN LINK SECURITY FENCE
AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 2-13-75 OCSD 9 3,000 Pyramid Fance $3,418.17 PO 2.28-76 $3,418.17
PW-041 ECCENTRIC PLUG VALVE
INSTALLATION, PRESSURE
TRUNK'S' 5-e-75 OCSD $5,000 F.T. Ziebarth $7,400.00 5.1475 B-13.75 $7.400.00
PW-043 JPL-ACTS PROCESS, UTILITY
PIPING AT RECLAMATION
PLANT NO.2 7-10-75 Carollo F.T. Zlebarth $21.500.00 PO 12.10.75 $24,173.00
PW-045 CONSTRUCTION OF JPL ACTS
PROCESS PLANT 9.8-75 Carollo J Putnam Henck $50.000.00 10.1.75 7,14.76 $1.416,240.63
PW-045-1 JPL-ACTS SALVAGE AND SITE Invest.Recovery
CLEARANCE 428.87 OCSD 41001000 Services $31,700.00 5.13.87 8.21.87 6 31,700.00
PW-046 DEMOLITION OF METER VAULTS
AND SHOP AT RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1 11-11-75 OCSD E&G Constr. $12,845.00 12-10.76 4-14J8 $12.845.00
PW-3
i ! [ l [ I d l 7 [ Il L
3194
CONTRACT
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
PW-047 NEW FIBERGLASS DUCTWORK
FOR HEADWORKS 'C' FRESH
AIR VENTILATION SYTEM AT
TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 12-16-75 OCSD $35,000 Beverly Pen. $29,664.00 1-1476 9.8.76 $29,664.00
PW-048 REBUILD NO. 10 ENGINE AT
TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 12-2-75 NO BIDS RECEIVED-WORK COMPLETED BY FORCE ACCOUNT.
PW-049 NEW WATER WELL NO. 1 AT
PLANT NO. 1 3-2-76 OCSD $30,000 Mc Celle Brae. $42,046A0 3-10-76 10-13-76 $2,946.00
PW-060 FOUL AIR TREATMENT,
PLANT NO. 2'C' HEAD WORKS 2-3-76 Carter $158,798 Skipper&Co. $147,969.00 2-11-76 11-9-77 $147,969.00
PW-051 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Southeast Janitor
MAINTENANCE 2-3-76 OCSD -- Service S390/month 2-11-76 2-11-77 $390/month
PW-052 AUTOMATIC GATE OPERATORS
DIVERSION STRUCTURE AT Instr& Mach
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 8-3-76 OCSD -- Systems $22,688.00 8.11-76 1.12-77 $22.688.00
PW-053 32 DIGESTER DOME HANGERS 8-31-76 OCSD $16,000 Production Stl $15,508.00 9-8-78
PW-054 SECURITY MONITORING
SYSTEM 6.17-76 OCSD -- Am.Diet Tel $11,150.00 7-1476
PW-055 ODOR CONTROL BLOWER
FOR DIVERSION&METERING
STRUCTURE(PHASE II PLANT
NO. 1 8.31-76 OCSD $15,000 hear Mach Sys $10,224.00 9.14.77 1.12.77 $10,224.00
PW-065-1 INTERPLANT ODOR CONTROL
FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1 2-24-77 OCSD $135,000 Skipper&Cc 0119,490.00 3-16-77 9-13-78 $120.264.37
PW-055-2 MODIFICATIONS TO ODOR
SCRUBBING TOWER AT
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 9-6-79 OCSD $15,000 P R Burka $16,939.00 9.12-79 6.11-80 $16,939.00
PW-058 INSTALLATION OF KNOTT
INTERCEPTOR AND ELLIS
TRUNK SEWER INTERCONNECTION (Project eenneHad-2126179)
PW-4
3/94
CONTRACT
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
PW-057 10,000 GALLON FUEL TANK VAPOR
RECOVERY SYSTEM AT
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 e-6-79 OCSD $3,000 Tried Mach. 83,553.00 9.12.79 12.12-79 83,660.30
PW-058 PLANT WATER AND CHLORINE
PROTECTIVE BUILDING AT
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 2.24-77 OCSD $8,500 Skyline Conat. $8,250.00 3-16-77 9-14-77 $8,250.00
PW-059 FRESH AIR FANS FOR
HEADWORKS "C" 2-24-77 OCSO $15,000 Skipper&Co. $13,165.00 3-16.77 1-11-78 $11,165.00
PW-060 PURCHASE OF 32 DIGESTER
DOME HANGERS 10-18.77 NO BIDS RECEIVED
PW-O60R THIRTY-TWO DIGESTER DOME
HANGERS 11.3-77 OCSD $20,000 Production Stl $17,455.00 11.9-77 -- $17,455.00
PW-061 DIGESTERS 5&S.C&D, F&G
GAS MIXING COMPRESSORS
AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2 5.1-79 OCSD $250,000 Tried Mach. $208,802.00 5.9.79 5-14.80 $213,797.00
PW-061R-1 REHABILITATION OF
DIGESTERS 5 AND 6 AT KENNEDY/
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 4-24.86 JENKS 81,600,000 Margate Const. $1.595,000.00 5.14.86 7-8.87 01,627,009.74
PW-061R-2 REHABILITATION OF
DIGESTERS C AND D AT KENNEDY/
AND TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 2-26-85 JENKS $1.600,000 Klewit Pacific $2,435,555.00• 3.13.85 5-14.86 $2,770,640.33
and includes the
PW-061R-3 REHABILITATION OF PW-061 R-3 job
DIGESTERS F AND G AT KENNEDY/
TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 2.26-85 JENKS $1,170,000 Kiewit Pacific
PW-061R-4 REPAIR OF DIGESTER G
DOME AT PLANT NO. 2 (Emergency Repair on Purchase Order Basis for total of$100,OOO)
PW-062 MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT
TREATMENT PLANTS NOS. 1 &2 7.11.78 OCSD $100.000 Sully-Miller $100,180.00 7-12.78 10.4-78 $64,570.03
PW-5
3194
CONTRACT
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
PW-063 NEW FIBERGLASS VENTILATION
SYSTEM FOR GRIT CHAMBERS
AND BAR SCREENS AT HEADWORKS
-C', TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 2-23-78 OCSD $34,000 Hickman Bros. $37.600.00 3-8-78 9.13.78 $37,600.00
PW-064A ACQUISITION OF PLANT AIR
COMPRESSOR AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO.2 3-30.78 OCSD a401000 U.S. Equip. $43,276.00 4.12.78 7-11.79 $43,486.07
PW-065 MODIFICATION OF HEADWORKS
'C' GRIT HOPPER AT RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1 3-30-78 OCSD 620,000 Production Stl 014,950.00 4-12-78 8-8-78 $14.950.00
PW-066 MODIFICATION OF EXISTING
SLUDGE HOPPER OUTLET PORT
AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 6-1-78 OCSD 611,GO0 Production Sri $16,135.00 6-14-78 10-4-78 516,135.00
PW-068.1 MODIFICATION OF EXISTING
SLUDGE HOPPER OUTLET PORTS
AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 5.1.79 OCSD $30,000 P.R. Burke $25,965.00 5.9-79 9-12-79 $25.965.00
PW-066-2 MODIFICATION OF EXISTING
SLUDGE HOPPER OUTLET PORTS
AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 6.10-80 OCSO $45,000 Brands[Mach. $34,977.00 6.11.80 10-8-80 $37,870.00
PW-067 INTERIM SOLIDS HANDLING
FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1 OCSD
PW-068 REHABILITATION OF
INCINERATOR 2 AND RAM
TABLES AT HEADWORKS -C-,
TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 5-1-79 OCSD $55,000 ALL BIDS REJECTED(5-9-79)
PW-06SR-A REHABILITATION OF
INCINERATOR AT HEADWORKS
-C',TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 7-31.80 OCSD $45,000 J.T.Thorpe $41.395.00 8-13-80 12-10-90 $47,617.80
PW-06BR-8 REHABILITATION OF RAM
TABLES AT HEADWORKS 'C',
TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 7-28.81 OCSD 075,000 ALL BIDS REJECTED-WORK TO BE DONE BY FORCE ACCT.
(INCINERATORS REMOVED-WORK NEVER DONE-8/82)
PW-6
3/94
CONTRACT
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
PW-069 INTERIM SEWAGE SLUDGE
FACILITY SITE PREPARATION
AT COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL 2-13-78 OCSD $150,000 J. AHukovich $208,500.00 2-14-79 a-13.79 $229,002.00
PW-069-1 WET WEATHER CONTINGENCY
PLAN AT COYOTE CANYON
SLUDGE PROCESSING SITE 10-2-79 OCSD 8200,000 Sully-Miller 9187,186.00 10.10-79 1-9-80 0226,704.10
PW-069-2 1980 IMPROVEMENTS TO
COYOTE CANYON SLUDGE Sheller
PROCESSING FACILITY 9.9-80 &Lohr $73,108 Sully-Miller 960,900.00 9-10-80 12-10-80 051.448.70
PW-07O FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR
EXISTING WAREHOUSE AT R&E Ind Fire
PLANT NO. 1 4-3-79 OCSD $19,000 Protection $19,749.00 4-11.79 9.12-79 819,749.00
PW-072 MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING
LAUNDERS AT SECONDARY
CLARIFIERS AT RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1 5-1-79 OCSD 9151000 P.R. Burke E26,940.00 6-13.79 9.12-79 627.573.73
PW-073 LABORATORY BENCH AND
FUME HOOD ADDITIONS
AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 6.5.80 OCSD 080,000 Equinox-Malibu $88,750.00 6.11.80 5.13.81 $104,730.82
PW-074 INSTALLATION OF PRIMARY
CLARIFIER NO. 1 SLUDGE
WITHDRAWAL PIPE AT
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 6.5.79 OCSD $23,000 P.R.Burke $26,664.00 6-13-79 9.12.79 $36,497.29
PW-075 APPROXIMATELY 800 LINEAR
FEET OF CHAIN LINK FENCE
WITH 24' GATE AT COYOTE
CANYONLANDFILL SITE 5.18-79 OCSO $10,000 Crown Fence $7.564.00 4-11-79 7-11-79 $9,884.00
PW.076 PRESSURE MANHOLE AND
STREET REPAIRS NEAR
ELLIS AVENUE PUMP STATION 7.10-79 OCSD $15,000 Byron Cmeur 914,500.00 7-11-79 9-12-79 $17,027.61
PW-077 MISCELLANEOUS -DON BOGART
PW-7
3/94
CONTRACT
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
PW-078 RESTROOM FACILITIES FOR
PERSONNEL OFFICE AND
OPERATORS' CHANGE ROOM
AND SHOWER FACILITIES 11.6.79 OCSD 645,000 G.E.Leach $19,499.00 11-14-79 3-12-80 $19,499.00
PW-079 INSTALLATION OF RAW SLUDGE
PUMPS AT PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION
BASINS D,E. F, G. H. I&J,
TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 4-3.80 OCSD $250.000 Equlnoz-Malibu 8185,000.00 4-9-80 1-14-81 8186,236AS
PW480 OPERATORS' CHANGE ROOM,
SHOWER,AND LUNCH ROOM
FACILITIES 12.20-79 OCSD 070.000 Joe Kay Design $39.700.00 1-9-80 7-9-20 $46,441.00
PW-081 SEALING DIGESTER E DOME
FOR GAS MIXING 1.15.80 OCSD -NO BIDS RECEIVED,GM TO APPOINT CONTRACTOR
PW-082 INSTALLATION OF DIGESTER
WASHWATER PIPING 2-28-80 OCSD $25,550 -NO BIDS RECEIVED-WORK TO BE DONE BY FORCE ACCOUNT.
PW-083 AUTO SHOP HOIST AT
(REBID) RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 8-28-84 OCSD $35,000 Jepson/Thomas $15,913.00 7-11-84 2.13.85 $18,263.00
PW-084 MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING
SLUDGE STORAGE HOPPER
BUILDING AT RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1 6.5.80 OCSD $50,000 Brandel Mach. 044,718.00 6-11-80 8.13-80 $44,718.00
PW-085 BULK CHLORINE FACILITIES AT
PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2 10-26-82 Keith $275,000 RJW ConeL $208,389.00 11.10.82 B-10.83 $217.775.83
PW-085-1 BULK CHLORINE SAFETY
(REBID) PIPING AND PLATFORMS OCSD&
AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2 9.13.83 Keith $57,560 Celiegua Inc. $57.560.00 8-10-83(GM) 4-11-84 $59,998.00
PW-086 ENTRY GATES AT PLANT
NO. 2 1-29-85 OCSD 8601000 All BIDS REJECTED-too high.
PW-088 CABINETS AND SHELVES FOR
BLUEPRINT ROOM IN
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
(PO 5703) 2-3-91 OCSD $10,000 Un-Mar Ind. 05,300.00 2-11-81 5-IS-81 45.300.00
PW-8
3194
CONTRACT
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
PW-089 CRANE RUNWAY EXTENSION—
SHOP'B',RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1 3-3-81 OCSD $15,000 Gen.Conveyor $9,895.00 48-81 8-12-81 $9,895.00
PW-090 MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT
PLANT NO. 1,PHASE 1 1-5-82 OCSO $44,000 Griffith Co. $43,861.50 1-13-82 3-10.82 $43.740.08
PW-091 FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK AT
IRESID) RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 6-1-82 Venn& Aeaoc. $14.000 OLT Conan. $15,948.00 6-9-82 11-10-82 $15,948.00
PW-092 DELAVAL ENGINE COMPRESSOR
UNITS TESTING AT BLOWER
BUILDING (PO 11705) Resmuecen 09,500.00 416-84 $14,500.00
PW-093 BULK HYDROGEN PEROXIDE
FACILITIES AT PLANT NO.2 IConstruceon cancelled--e-15-831
PW-094 TUNNEL ACCESS MAN LADDERS
AND DISTRIBUTION BOX HANDRAILS OCSD&
AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2 8-28-82 Brannon $16,000 Inc.Meint.Spec. $8,780.00 10-13-82 4.13-83 $10.011.44
PW-095 REMOVE FOSTER INSULATION 10-7-82 OCSD $75,000 Mad-Tox Assoc. $8,675.00 10-13-82 3.9-83 $11,277.50
PW-096 NEW CHLORINE DIFFUSERS AT
HEADWORKS"C",TREATMENT
PLANT NO.2 6.1.82 Vann& Assoc. $30.000 Advanco Constr. $18,705.00 6-9-82 9-8-82 $22,144.55
PW-097 REFURBISH EFFLUENT JUNCTION
BOXES AT PLANT NO. 1 AND PLANT
NO. 2 2-28-84 OCSD $110,000 Advanco Constr. $106.600.00 3-14-94 11-14-84 $106,600.00
PW-098 MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT
TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2
(Completed by bonding company) 11-2-82 OCSD $225,000 L&H Covet. $129.718.00 11.10.82 9-14-83 $182.412.92
PW-099 REHABILITATION OF PLANT NO. 2
'C' HEADWORKS INFLUENT
SEWER GATES 8.30-83 Hangs $120,000 CK Pump $131,659.85 9-14-83 6.13-84 $132,850.05
PW-100 DRYER FOR PLANT 2 AIR SYSTEM OCSD $45.000
PW-9
3/94
CONTRACT
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
PW-101 WASTEHAULER TRUCK MONITORING
SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 11-29-83 OCSD $30,000 Cinn.Time $18,425.64 12-14-83 411-84 618,425.54
PW-102 FILTRATE LINE TO DISTRIBUTION
BOX 12.13-83 OCSD $35,000 P.C.David $33,700.00 12-14.83 7-11-84 637,418.00
PW-103 Deleted
PW-104 SAFETY HANDRAILS ON SCUM
BOX COVERS,PLANTS NOS. 1
AND 2 8-30.83 OCSD $30,000 CraneVeyor $13,190.40 9-14-83 5-8-84 $15,588.04
PW-105 SECURITY FENCING AT
TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 12.29-83 OCSD $90.000 Crown Fence $47,697.00 1-I1.84 5.9.84 $47,915.22
PW-106 REPLACE'C' HEADWORKS
CONVEYOR AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO.2 8-30-83 OCSD $100,000 G &B Morgan $76.450.00 9-14-83 7-11-84 $77,857.00
PW-107 SAFETY PLATFORMS AT BELT
FILTER PRESSES,RECLAMATION
PLANT NO. 1 8-30-83 OCSD $351000 Belmont EnerB. $32,156.00 9.14.83 2-e-84 $32,156.00
PW-108 SLUDGE AND DIGESTER GAS
PIPING, PLANT NO.2 9.27.83 OCSD 4100,000 Kiewit Pacific $87.866.00 10-12-93 2-8-84 $87,866.00
PW-109 MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 12.29-83 OCSD $70,000 Foth&Sane $66,916.76 1-11-84 6-13-84 $90,926.15
PW-110 SUPPLEMENTAL CHLORINATION
AT HEADWORKS'C'.TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2 9-27-83 OCSD $55,000 Dorado Enterprises $58,179.00 10-12.83 3.14-84 658,179.00
PW-111 LABORATORY BALANCE PLATFORM
PLANT NO. 1 9-20-83 OCSD 64,100 Wervi Conat. $1,547.00 (PO 13912) $1.547.00
PW-112 OFFICE PARTITIONS AND LAVATORY
AT PLANT NO.2 2-28-84 OCSD W'000 Frank Ultimo $19,969.00 3.14-84 8-8-84 $20,578.43
PW-113 FABRICATION. INSTALLATION AND
COVERING OF 16 STANDARD
SEWAGE SAMPLERS IForce Aoeount Workl 7-11.84
PW-10
I 1 I H 1 / F G H ( t H ! H H .H 4 H t H H
3194
CONTRACT
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
PW-114 PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF
BUDD PLASTIC CHAIN,SPROCKETS
AND APPURTENANCES (Purchase Order Contract)
PW-115 STAIRWAY AND WALKWAY
ADDITIONS AT TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2 12-29-84 OCSD $48.000 Paramount Md. $28,483.00 1-11-84 7.12-84 $29,483.00
PW-116 UPS SYSTEM FOR PLANT NO.2
RPUs 4-24-84 OCSD $26,ODo Ultmo 026,850.00 6.13-84 9.24.84 1125,850.D0
PW-117 MU%-TWO PACKAGED ROOF
AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS
FOR PLANT NO. 2 POWER
BUILDING B (Ordered by Maintenance under Purchase Order-.10-15-841
PW-118 pH AND CONDUCTIVITY METERS
FOR"C' HEADWORKS INFLUENT
TRUNKS 4.24.84 OCSD $75,000 Allan El... 81 4.11-84 2-13-85 $55,509.00
PW-119 PAVING AND DRAINAGE AT
PLANT NO, 2 10.30.84 OCSD $220,000 Ultimo $142,771.30 11.14-84 4-10-85 $179,584.94
PW-120 DIGESTER A. DOME SEAL,
TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2
PW-121 WASTE GAS BURNERS AT
TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 5.29-84 OCSD 048,000 Ultimo $54,900.00 8.13.84 9.11.84 $65.750.60
PW-121.1 MODIFICATIONS TO WASTE
GAS BURNERS AT PLANT
NO. 2 (Required by SCAOMDI OCSD $100,000 Sur-Lit.Corp. $80.712.00 5.12.87 9-3-87 $80,712.00
PW-122 COOLING WATER REUSE AT
FOSTER PUMP STATION 4-24.84 OCSD $22,000 Welder Engrg. 427,765.00 4.11.84 11.14-84 $23,520.00
PW-123 PIPING FOR RETURN SLUDGE
CHLORINATION AT PLANT NO. 2
SECONDARY SETTLING BASINS 4-3-84 OCSD $80,000 Petted& Ludwig $54,495.00 4.3.84 7-17-84 $72,614.72
PW-11
3194
CONTRACT
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT.
PW-124 MODIFICATION OF ONE
DISSOLVED AIR FLOTATION UNIT
AT PLANT NO.2 SECONDARY
TREATMENT FACILITIES OCSD Serck Baker(PO) $17,952.00 2-e-84 418-84 11171952.00
PW-125 ENTRY GATES AT PLANT
NO.2 1.29-RS OCSD 660,000 All bide r.j.oted--too high.
PW-125 ENTRY GATES AT PLANT Shamrock
(REBID) NO. 2 (Force Account) 3.2M85 OCSD $80,000 Alarm SYateme(POI9951)3.13-85 2-13.86 $93,764.17
PW-126 FULL SCALE KOMAX PROCESS 3.1484 Force Account 3-14-84
PW-127 PILOT-SCALE HIPERION
PROCESS 3.1484 Force Account 3-14.84
PW-128 MODIFY TWO ADDITIONAL
DAF UNITS AT PLANT 2
SECONDARY TREATMENT
FACILITIES.-Force Account 4.11-84 OCSD Dorado
PW.129 LURE OIL STORAGE TANK
AT FOSTER PUMP STATION,
PLANT NO. 2 10-31-84 OCSD $20,000 Ultimo 624,071.00 11.1484 7-10.85 $24.096.10
PW-130 LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN
AT PLANT NO. 2 (Included In Job No.P235)
PW-131 OXYGEN PLANT INSTRUMENT
AIR PLANT WATER ADDITIONS P016378 OCSD $7,700 Dorado $6,400.00 6-484 05.686.66
PW-132 FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION
OF ADAPTOR SPOOLS FOR
METER REPLACEMENTS 7-3-84 OCSD 3 65,000 Floyd Kordick 6119.631.00 7.11.84 2-13.85 $141.515.80
PW.133 AIR CONDITIONING IMPROVEMENTS
FOR THE ADMINISTRATION BLDG. PO OCSD Debi.Enter. $9,271.45
PW-134 LAUNDER LEVEL CONTROL SYSTEM 10-28-85 OCSD Kiewit Pacific $362,363.00 11.13-85 8-1-89 $375,577.79
PW.135 FERRIC CHLORIDE PIPING TO
DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURES,
PLANT 2 - OCSD
PW-12
i � < < [ E a: n I t I •T Y I F f
3194
CONTRACT
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
PW-136 PHASE I, OFFICE MODIFICATIONS )Force Account)
PW-137 (Nat Assigned)
PW-138 FERRIC CHLORIDE AND POLYMER
DOSING SYSTEMS, PHYSICAL/
CHEMICAL PROJECT OCSD (Force Account)
PW-139 REPLACEMENT OF SLUICE GATES
AT HEADWORKS C. PLANT NO. 2 1-29-85 OCSD $196,000 Kiewit Pacific 0307.667.00 2-13-85 2.13-86 $331.729.62
PW-140 AIR CONDITIONING FOR LOCKER
ROOM AREA IN DEWATERING
BUILDING,PLANT NO. 2 OCSD AirPlus $6,607.00 3-21-85 8-1485 $6,607.00
PW-141 FERROUS CHLORIDE SYSTEM
FOR DIGESTER GAS SULFIDE
REDUCTION 3-5-85 OCSD $299,000 Fraser Corp. $376.000.00 3-13-85 8-14-85 W4,227.80
PW-141 A PURCHASE OF THREE HYDROGEN
(E-167) SULFIDE MONITORS RE FERROUS
CHLORIDE SYSTEM FOR DIGESTER
GAS SULFIDE REDUCTION OCSD $90,000 Foxboro Corp. $83,600 11-13-85 N/A $83,600.00
PW-142 SARI/SUNFLOWER DIVERSION
STRUCTURE MODIFICATIONS OCSD Dorado(Force Account) 6-12-85
PW-143 DIGESTER CLEANING BED
REHABILITATION AT PLANT NO.2 OCSD 6360,000 (Job Cancelled-included in Job No.J-151
PW-144 WASTE SIDESTREAM AND SLUDGE
PUMP STATIONS, COMMINUTOR
AND SCUM SYSTEM Berryman Floyd-Kardick,
IMPROVEMENTS 1.29.86 Stephenson Joint Venture $1,354,999 2-13-86 2-11-87 $1,439,766.13
PW-145 WAREHOUSE OIL DOCK AND
SECURITY FENCING,PLANT
NO. 1 OCSD (Cancelled and included in J-20)
PW-146 PERSONNEL ROOM ADDITION AT
PLANT NO. 1 OCSD Force Account
PW-13
W94
CONTRACT
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT.
PW-147 VEHICLE STORAGE AND SCREEN
WALL AT PLANT NO. 1 OCSD (Cancelled and Included in J-20)
PW-148 TRAINING ROOM AT PLANT NO.2 OCSD Force Account
PW-149 LAB MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO.2 OCSD Force Acccunl
PW-150 INSULATION FOR ENGINE PIPING Thorpe
IN HEADWORKS C AT PLANT NO.29/24/85 OCSD Inwlation 818,800 10-16-BS 2-13-86 819,150.00
PW-151 REALIGNMENT AND PAVING OF
GARFIELD AVENUE AT PLANT NO. 1
REAR ENTRANCE (Cancelled end included in Job No.P1.30)
PW-162 REPAIR GRIT CHAMBER VALVE AT Dorado
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 OCSD Enterprises $18,195 11-13-85 4-9-86 $18,195.00
THIS IS THE ENO OF THE PW SERIES OF JOB NUMBERS, ALL JOBS ARE NOW GIVEN THE NEXT AVAILABLE Pl. P2, J OR I NUMBER.
PW-14
! I I I I I I I 1 t I I 1 I 1 I I 1 !
Updated: 3194
DISTRICT CONTRACTS
DISTRICT NO. 1
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT
SANTA ANA TRUNK
(SECTIONS 1, It & )II) 5-12-52 M.Killer $428.612.00 5152 11-7-52 $431,507.10
DYER ROAD TRUNK(Renamed
Santa Ana/Dyer Road Trunk Sewer) W. Reetz 5152
BRISTOL STREET TRUNK OCSD A. Famularo 416.52 8-28.52 $19,436.00
FAIRVIEW ROAD TRUNK 7-30-52 OCSD $314,587 J.Barrett $304,420.14 8-6-52 5-11-53 $317,226.69
1-6 GRAND TRUNK SEWER 6.IS-66 Boyle $76,026 R.DeLeon $77,250.54 6-8-66 11-13-66 $87.974.42
1.6-1 WARNER AVENUE SUSTRUNK
SEWER 10.11.66 Bove $42,076 Far Western $35.318.04 10-13-66 3-6-67 $37,092.76
1-7 BROADWAY TRUNK SEWER 6-17-66 Boyle $291,005 R.DeLeon $262,399.04 7166 11-28-66 $267.694.42
1-8 MAIN STREET TRUNK SEWER 2-7-67 Boyle $177,010 Far Western $151,128.25 2-8-67 6-5-67 $158,465.80
1-9 FRUIT STREET TRUNK SEWER 1.23.68 Boyle $182,127 Scott Bros. $147,915.96 1-25-68 6-11-68
1-10 NORTH BRISTOL STREET
TRUNK SEWER 5-28-69 Bove $255,550 V.Semerzich $255,550.00 6.12.68 1-17-69 $257,767.48
1-11 LOWER MAIN STREET and
BROADWAY TRUNK SEWER 2-10-70 Boyle $343.120 Selata. lnc $348,317.00 2.11.70 8-5-70 $348,317.40
1.12 MAIN-DYER INTERCEPTOR,
REACHES 26,26,27,28 8.9-71 Boyle $499.144 M. Maeonovch $472,146.00 8-11-71 5-5-72 $474,956.00
1.13 NEW SIPHON GREENVILLE
SULLIVAN TRUNK 8.24-72 Boyle $23.775 Bobek Corp. $24,028.00 8-28.72 10.10.72 $24,028.00
(GREENVILLE STREET AND
WARNER AVENUE)
1-14 RAITT STREET TRUNK SEWER 10-5-76 Boyle $1,407.966 Subelo/Anukoyich $1,277,128.00 10-13-76 7-29-77 $1,278,070.95
1-1511 SANTA ANA/DYER ROAD
TRUNK SEWER MANHOLE 6.23-87 RMG $100.000 Sencon EnBr. $139,000 7-8-87 1-13-88 $152,100.00
REHABILITATION
DISTRICT 1--PAGE 1
l t 1 I I l ! t I t 1 t 1 t t t t 1 t
Updated: 3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT
1.16 MODIFICATIONS TO
SANTA ANAIDYER ROAD
TRUNK SIPHON UNDER THE
SANTA ANA RIVER
(included in Cont. I4l-1 A-2) 1-7-92 Boyle Slave P.Radoc, Inc. $2,945,000 2-19-92 3-10-93 $3,048.238.00
DISTRICT 1--PAGE 2
[ l [ [ [ [ [ l t l l [ l l l [ [ [ [
Updated: 3194
DISTRICT CONTRACTS
DISTRICT NO. 2
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT
2-1 NEWHOPE-PLACENTIA TRUNK
SEWER 1-7-59 B.&L.- $2,613,900 V. Anukovich $2,344,558.60 1-14-59 3-26.60 $2,389,661.19
2-2 SOUTH ANAHEIM INTERCEPTOR
TRUNK SEWER 4-29-59 B.&L.' $471,465 Sebak&Brkich $485.114.50 5-28-59 4-20-60 $ 487,687.52
24 NEWHOPE-PLACENTIA TRUNK
SEWER 8-26-59 BoNe $1,097,337 J.Anukovich $1.239,085.50 8.28-59 3.9-61 $1,294,146.76
24 CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK
SEWER 1-13-W B.&L.- $412,461 VenVelkBMurgh $399,199.00 2.460 6.3-W $ 400,870.08
2-5 ORANGE SUBTRUNK SEWER
& OLIVE SUBTRUNK 7.29.59 B. &L.- $338,860 J.Aniskovich $348.312.50 8.27-59 4-26.60 $345,403.50
SEWER
2-5 ORANGE SUBTRUNK--PARTIAL
RELOC. RELOCATION FROM CITY DRIVE TO SIKAND
METROPOLITAN DRIVE 1969 ENG.ASSOC. (SEWER RELOCATED FOR CITY MANAGEMENT CORP.)
2-SA ORANGE SUBTRUNK DIVERSION
MANHOLE AT THE SANTA ANA
RIVER INTERCEPTOR 11.4-80 Lowry $13,500 NO BIDS RECEIVED. TO BE REBID AT A LATER DATE.
2-SA ORANGE SUBTRUNK DIVERSION
(Rebid) MANHOLE AT SANTA ANA
INTERCEPTOR 12-9-80 Lowry $20,000 Sully-Miller $36,000.0 12-10-80 4-8-91 $38,000.00
2.5.1 ORANGE SUBTRUNK SEWER
GROUTED RIPRAP
PROTECTION DIKE-POB17124 Lowry $10,000 Paul Hubbs $9,545.00 10-28-70 11-10.70 $9,545.00
2-5-2 MODIFICATIONS TO ORANGE
SUBTRUNK SEWER AND OUVE
SUBTRUNK SEWER AT THE
SANTA ANA FREEWAY(portion
of CALTRANS 1-5 Freeway widening
pro1e00 (Included in CALTRANS project)
District 2-Page 1
l t t t 1 [ [ 1 [ [ [ l 1 1 l t t [ [
Updated: 3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT
2-SR ORANGE SUBTRUNK SANTA
ANA RIVER CROSSING 4-10-78 Lowry $208,514 J.Anukovich $276,100.00 3-30-78 6.1-78 $281,780.00
2-511-1 OLIVE SUBTRUNK SANTA
ANA RIVER CROSSING 3-27-79 Lowry $173,000 J. Anukovich $189,970.00 411-79 9-28-79 $189,970.00
2-6 OLIVE SUBTRUNK SEWER AND
TAFT BRANCH 3-9-60 B.&L.' $349.755 J.S. Barrett $267,529.04 3-23-60 9-7-60 $257,001.80
2-6-1 LINCOLN INTERCEPTOR SEWER
FROM SAR INTERCEPTOR TO
EAST OF BATAVIA STREET (Constructed with City of Orange. finished by OCSD)
2-6-2 TAFT INTERCEPTOR SEWER 8-27-85 Berryman Mladen
Stephenson $1,961,070 Suntich Const. $1,679,648.00 10-16-85 4.09-86 $1,448,202.30
2-7 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK SEWER 4-27-60 Beryla $792,368 Zarubica $899,772.06 5-11-60 2.10-61 $881,746.58
2-8 PIONEER BRANCH SUBTRUNK
SEWER 427-60 B&L' $91,686 R.Flickinger $83,983.00 5.11-60 9.9-60 $83.655.63
2-9 CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK
SEWER 10-13.60 B& L' $116,419 West Coast $104,611.30 10-28.60 2.10-61 $108,651.20
2-9-RI REHABILITATION OF CYPRESS
AVE.SUBTRUNK SEWER -Project Report: Willden
-Design: Church
2-9A RELOCATE PORTION OF
CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK
SEWER IBy developer)
2-9-1 & ORANGE FREEWAY SEWER
2-12 CROSSINGS,CYPRESS 7-2-68 OCSD S80,S00 J.L.Scott $52,971.85 7-10-68 9-20-68 554.105.85
AVENUE RELIEF SEWER AND
YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN
2-9-2 RELOCATE PORTION OF CYPRESS
AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER
2-10-1 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 3-6-64 Boyle $332,515 Kon ick&Son $360,428.00 3-11-64 8-12.64 $360,366.12
2-10-1A EUCLID RELIEF TRUNK SEWER 2.26.85 Lowry 05,800,000 Nuevo Camino $5,090,487.00 3.13-85 5.14.86 $5,231,661.08
District 2-Page 2
[ [ [ [ [ ! l l l [ 1 1 1 [ [ t [ l [
Updated: 3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT
2-1O11-1 REPAIR OF MANHOLES IN EUCLID
AVENUE(ELLIS AVE TO GARDEN
GROVE BLVD) 7-28-81 Lowry, $75.000 Sanoon $39,808.00 8-12-81 10.1481 $42,304.00
2-10-2 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 4.2-64 B.&L.- $209,280 Bask. 6 231,862.00 4-8-64 10-14-64 0233,380.50
2-10R-2 REPAIR OF MANHOLES IN EUCLID
AVENUE(GARDEN GROVE BLVD TO
ORANGETHORPE AVE) 9-8-81 Lowry 092,790 Sancon $82.242.00 9-9-81 12-10-81 $90,470.00
2-10-3 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 7-7-65 B.& L.- $188,153 C.Brown $200,027.00 7-14-65 1-19-66 $200,692.31
2-IOR-3 REPAIR OF MANHOLES IN EUCLID
AVENUE(TALBERT AVE TO BOLSA
AVE) 1.27.82 OCSD $64,000 Sencon $63,895.00 1-27-82 414-82 $62.395.00
2-10.4 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 4-4-66 S.&L.' $243,179 A&P Pipeline $215,843.20 44-66 8-18-68 $221.123.20
2-10-5 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER Agmemt. B.yIe $113,279 City of Garden Grove 11-9-66 8-29.67
2-10-6 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 6.7-67 B.& L.' 0498,017 V.Samadzich 9470,723.75 6-1476 3-29-68 $471,170.80
2-10-7 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 1-16-68 B.& L.' $255,054 Far Western $237.174.00 1.25-68 6-7-68 $236,162.00
2-10-8 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 3.11.68 OCSD $409,410 Marco Constr. $373,767.50 3-13-68 10-25-68 $384,934.77
2-10-9 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 10.7.68 Boyle $530,685 Chadea Burch $459,992.00 10-9-68 7-30-69 $461.229.00
2-11-1 ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SUBTRUNK
SEWER 2-6-67 B.& L.' $248,865 M.P.Mitrovich $169,589.70 2-8-67 . 8-15.67 $170,862.06
2.11.2 ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SEWAGE
PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAIN
SEWER 3.6-67 S.& L.' $154,801 Industrial Pipe $161,347.05 3-8-67 3-13-68 $160,281.93
2-11.3 NORTH BRANCH OF THE ROLLING S.W.
HILLS RELIEF SUBTRUNK SEWER 7-25-89 Peterson $600,000 Colich&Sons $697,356.00 8-9.89 7.11-90 $799,549.00
2.12 Soo 2-9-1
2-12R YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN
INVESTIGATION 2-6-75 OCSD $27,500 M.Dakovich $24.200.00 2-19-75 4-5-75 $11,350.00
District 2-Page 3
Updated: 3M4
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT
2-13 TRASK AVENUE INTERCEPTOR
SEWER 1-9-70 Lowry 999,500 Cappello $115,890.00 1-14.70 7-21-70 8t3i,853.54
2-14-1 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
FROM REC. PLANT NO. 1 TO
KATELLA AVENUE
Wed.Grant C-06-0741-010) 4-6.72 Lowry 98,942,015 Sully-Miller 67,676,112.00 9-6.72 7-10-74 $7.834.726.00
2-14-2 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR,
FROM KATELLA AVENUE TO
LA PALMA AVENUE
(Fed.Grant 4C-06-0761-0101 11-7-73 Lowry 84,895,000 Kaeler/Woode $3,545,635.33 11-14-73 1-31-75 $3,573,793.00
2.14.3 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
SEWER 1 IN LA PALMA AVE FROM
GROVE ST TO IMPERIAL HWY)&
SOUTH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
CONNECTOR (IN IMPERIAL HWY, FROM
300'SOUTH OF SANTA ANA CANYON
RD TO LA PALMA AVE). REACHES
2, 3 and 4IFed.Grant NC.06-0951) 7.22-75 Lowry 83,815,183 Artokovieh,JV $3,914,462.00 8-13.75 7-22-77 $3,872,351.77
2-14.3A SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
SEWER (FROM GROVE ST TO
IMPERIAL HWY) MANHOLE COVERS Long Beech
AND FRAMES 10-21-75 Lowry 4 3,700 Ironwork. 8 3,604.00 11-12-75 5-31-76 8 3,604.00
2-14-4 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
SEWER (FROM IMPERIAL HWY TO
GYPSUM CANYON RD) REACH 5
Pad.Grant pC-06-0951) 8-19-75 Lowry $4,678,458 Ke.lar/Woode $4,240,957.00 10-1-75 8-31-76 $4,328,852.00
2-14.4A SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
SEWER(FROM IMPERIAL HWY TO
GYPSUM CANYON RD) MANHOLE Long Beech
COVERS AND FRAMES 10.21-75 Lowry 8 5,180 Ironwork. 8 5,045.60 11.12-75 3.31-76 $ 5,045.60
2.14.413 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
CONTROL GATE STRUCTURE 11-4.80 Lowry 4 61,000 R.Skemnes 6 107,358.12 11.12-80 8.12.81 It 120,058.12
2-14-4C IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SANTA ANA
RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONTROL
GATE STRUCTURE PO#8267 Champion Fence 4 1,414.00 8 1,414.00
District 2- Page 4
[ I 1 1 l l [ [ 1 ( l l 1 1 [ l [ l 1
Updated: 3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT ANIT
2-14-4R TRENCH REPAIR,SANTA ANA RIVER
INTERCEPTOR SEWER,LA PALMA
AVE BETWEEN IMPERIAL HWY AND
FAIRMONT BLVD 10-5-82 OCSD $ 20.000 L&H Cornet. S 25,150.00 10-13-82 12-8.82 S 25,150.00
2-1 4-5 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
SEWER (GYPSUM CANYON RD
TO ORANGE COUNTY LINE),
REACHES 6, 7&8 (Fed.Grant
BC-06-0951) 10-21-75 Lowry $2,483,167 S.Zarabica $2,096.676.15 11-12-75 3.16-77 62,132,524.00
2-14-SR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
EROSION PROTECTION ll-480 Lowry 9 198,000 HawleyMubbs $ 153,010.00 11-12-80 3.11-81 S 160,812.16
2-14-5111 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
MANHOLE EROSION PROTECTION 3-25-86 Keith $ 3001000 JWMitchell Co. S 237,000.00 5-14-86 8-13-86 $ 296,900.00
2-15-SR2 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
MANHOLE EROSION PROTECTION
AND ACCESS ROADS
2-1411 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR
MANHOLE REHABILITATION 2-18-89 DGA $ 210,000 Sencon Ene, S 312,550.00 5.10-89 12-13-89 $ 312.550.00
2-15 YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION 9-4-74 Lowry $ 532.000 Hanck,JV $ 671,146.00 9.11-74 6-9-76 $ 696.035.00
2-15-1 YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION
DIVERSION MANHOLE 3-15-77 Lowry S 25.000 Sejec Corp. S 18,994.00 413-77 5-28-77 $ 20.799.98
2-16-1 KRAEMER BLVD INTERCEPTOR
SEWER, PALM DR TO IMPERIAL
HWY 3-20-75 Lowry S 577,761 G.Miller $ 563,936.80 4-9-75 10-21-75 $ 602.699.00
District 2-Page 5
Updated: 3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT
2-16-2 YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN, FROM
ASSOCIATED RD TO KRAEMER
BLVD 1-6.76 Lawry 8 660,300 V. Artukowch $ 660,287.98 1-14-76 10-31-76 S 689,085.00
2-17-1 CARBON CANYON—PALM DRIVE
INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH ( 12-5-74 Lowry 9 810,930 Babek Co. S 733,147.00 12-11-74 6-30-75 S 731,004.00
2-17-2 CARBON CANYON--PALM DRIVE
INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 2,
CARBON CANYON CHANNEL
TO KRAEMER BOULEVARD 11-21-74 Lowry $ 701,000 M.Dakevlch 9 539,462.00 12-11-74 7.15-75 $ 540,588.00
2.18 CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR
SEWER,LA PALMA AVENUE TO
CROWTHER AVENUE 6-474 Lowry $1,404,188 S.2ambica $1,472,160.42 6.12-74 6-30-75 $1,481,327.00
2.19 RICHFIELD SUBTRUNK(ORANGE-
THORPE TO LA PALMA)-Bid w/2.20 6-13.78 Lowry $ 450,000 Christeve Corp S 503.909.00 6.1478 4-11-79 $ 520,736.13
2-20 ORCHARD(KELLOGG)SUBTRUNK
(ORANGETHORPE TO LA PALMA)-
Bid w/2-19 5-13-78 Lowry $ 204.000 Chdateve Corp $ 230,301.00 6-1478 411.79 S 231,804.33
2.21 CARBON CANYON DAM
INTERCEPTOR 3-25-80 Brennan $1.350,000 Prkocin/Runle $1,015,195.00 49.80 12-10-80 $1,048,437.56
2.22 EAST RICHFIELD INTERCEPTOR
SEWER(Changed title from
OrangethoMe Trunk Connection Lowry (redesigned
to SARO(Construction administered by Willden)
by EMA) Belzac Const. 5.89
2-23 FAIRVIEW-WEST INTERCEPTOR SEWER Lowry
2-24 MODIFICATIONS TO CARBON CANYON
DAM PUMP STATION 6-26.84 Lowry $ 200,000 Subgrade $ 138,630.80 7-11-84 5-25-85 8 135.786.92
2-25 FULLERTON-BREA INTERCEPTOR
SEWER 7-29-86 Lowry $11.375,000 Colich&Sons $8,861,000.00 10-13-86 2-10-88 $9,159.831.49
District 2-Page 6
t [ d ( [
Updated: W94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT
2-26 EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER
(Karelia to Broadway—Co-op project
w/City of Anaheim,Road and Storm
Drain Improvements--Admin.by City (Dlsts.portion)
or Anaheim) Willdan Aeaoe. S.A.Healy $3.997.050.29 6.28-80 7.16-87
2.26.1 Portion of EUCLID INTERCEPTOR
SEWER (Lampoon to Orangewood
—co-op project with City of Gordan Willden Steve Bubalo
Grave--Admin-by CSD) 3.22-88 Assoc. $3,500,000 Coast.Co. 82,745,502.50 5.1&88 3-489 6 2,860,119.50
2-26.2 Portion of EUCLID INTERCEPTOR
and SEWER (Edinger to Lampoon)
2-27 and SOUTH ANAHEIM RELIEF Willden
SEWER 2-21-89 Assoc. $ 8,000,000 W.H.Ebert $9,242,538.00 3.8.89 6-13.90 $10.063,017.00
2.26-3 Portion of EUCLID INTERCEPTOR
and SEWER(Broadway to Omngathorpa) $7.300,000 $6,321,005.00
2-28 KATELLA RELIEF SEWER Inc.In above $650,600.00
and (between Euclid St.and Walnut Scl Willden Steve Subtle
2.29 ORANGEWOOD DIVERSION SEWER 8.21-90 Assoc. $1.400,000 Coast.Co. $1.344.900.00 9.12-90 11-19-92 $8,649,790.08
2.30 MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR
(formerly La Veto Relief Sewer) 4-28-92 Boyle $4.100,000 Mledon Suntich $3,471,857.00 5.13-92 7.1493 $3,656,604.22
2-31 SANTA ANA INTERCEPTOR RELIEF
SEWER (portions of 2-14-3 and Willden
2.14.4) Assoc.
2-32 SAWPA TRUNK LINE DIVERSION
GATE AND MONITORING SYSTEM
2.33 PALM AVENUE PURCHASE
ABANDONMENT AND YORBA
LINDA PUMP STATION
IMPROVEMENTS
2-34 MANHOLE REHASILIATION ON
EUCLID TRUNK SEWER AND
EUCLID RELIEF TRUNK SEWER
District 2-Page 7
UPdeted: 3/84
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT
2-35 MODIFICATIONS TO PORTIONS OF
EUCLID TRUNK SEWER AND
EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER
FOR 1-5 WIDENING PROJECT
"SEGMENT C"—For CALTRANS
2.36 SEWER ENCASEMENTS REQUIRED
FOR AT&SF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
COMMUTER RAIL
2-37 MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS AND
REHABILITATION OF OUTLYING PUMP
STATIONS
2-38 MODIFICATIONS TO OLIVE SUBTRUNK
AND SARI RIVER CROSSINGS FOR
SANTA ANA RIVER WIDENING PROJECT
(Conavoction to be done by CALTRANS)
Diatdct 2-Pape 8
REVISION DATE: 3194
DISTRICT CONTRACTS
DISTRICT NO.3
DATE FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
3-00 Alterations to Hazard Avenue Sulfide
Control Station 9-23-64 B.& 1.- $8,400 Wigga Constr. $10,334.00 9.30.64 12.9-64 $70,334.00
3-00-1 Abandon Hazard Avenue Sulfide
Control Station OCSD (Purchase Order contract with Anaheim Sewer Construction)
30008 Conversion of WestsMe Pump Station Force Account 601
30008-A7 Piping for Westside Pump Station
Conversion Keenan Pipe 3-12-71
3-1 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer and
Busherd Relief Sewer 12-17-58 B&L $3,155,390 J.S.Barrett $2,667,727.50 12-10-58 12-18.59 $2,657,829.71
3.1 R.1 Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk 1-6-77 OCSO $30,000 BIDS REJECTED (Later incorporated into Cont. 3-1R-31
3-1R-2 Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk 12-16.76 OCSD 6301000 Rewee-Schoek 640,078.00 1.12.77 4-13.77 11
3.1 R-3 Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole
Shafts,Miller-Holder Trunk 5-3-77 OCSD 632,900 F.B.Cook $48,431.20 7-29-77 4.12-78 $55,761.88
3.1 R-4 Repair of Menholea on Miller-Holder
Trunk (Negotiated Contract not to exceed 645,000--job never eompletedl
3.2 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 2.25-59 8&L $1,713,250 Steve Rados $1,547.860.00 3.26-59 6-25-60 $1,603,273.64
3.2R.1 Manhole Repair,Miller-Holder
Trunk 1-8-80 Brennen 655,000 Peter C.David $83,610.00 2-13-80 12-10-80 $108,232.59
3-3 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 3.25-59 B&L $1,898,682 N.Anukovich 61,846,870.00 4159 8-12.60 $1,867,532.61
3-3R-1 Manhole Repair, Millar-Holder
Trunk Sower.Station 796+83 8.30.83 OCSD $35,000 George Miller $37,777.00 9.14.83 11-9-83 637,777.00
3.4-A Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 4.22.59 B&L $1,470,960 Dakovich $1,363.107.50 5.14-59 6.29-60 $1.374,155.78
34A Repair.to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer B&L $59,450 J.S. Barren (Time and Mitedalcl 1961
3.4A-R Remedial Work to Miller-Holder
Trunk Sewer 9-5-63 B&L $67,532 (ALL BIDS REJECTED-10-11-61)
District 3-Page 1
REVISION DATE: 3)94
DISTRICT CONTRACTS
DISTRICT NO,3
DATE FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
3-00 Alterations to Hazard Avenue Sulfide
Control Station 9-23-64 B.& I.- $8,400 Wiggs Constr. $10,334.00 9-30-64 12-9-64 $10,334.00
3.00.1 Abandon Hazard Avenue Sulfide
Control Station OCSD (Purchase Order contract with Anaheim Sewer Construction)
30008 Conversion of Westaide Pump Stetson Force Account 61`71
30008-Al Piping for Westside Pump Station
Conversion Keenan Pipe 3-12.71
3.1 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer and
eu.hend Relief Sewer 12-17-58 S&L $3,155.390 J.S.Barrett $2,667,727.50 12-10-SB 12-18-59 $2,657,829.71
3-1R-1 Manhole Repair. Miller-Holder Trunk 1.&77 OCSD $30,000 BIDS REJECTED (Later incorporated into Cont.3.111-3)
3.1 R-2 Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk 12-16-76 OCSD $30,000 Rewas-Sehock $40,078.00 1-12-77 L13-77 $40,435.50
3.1 R-3 Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole
Shafts,Miller-Holder Trunk 5-3-77 OCSD $32,900 F. B.Cook $48,431.20 7-29-77 L12.78 055,761.88
3-1R-4 Repair of Manholes on Miller-Holder
Trunk (Negotiated Contract not to exceed$45,000--job never completed)
3-2 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 2-25-59 B&L $1,713,250 Steve Rados 111,547,860.00 3-26-59 B-25.60 $1,603,273.64
3.311-1 Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder
Trunk 1-8-80 Brennen $55,000 Peter C. David $83,610.00 2-13-80 12-10.80 $108,232.59
3-3 Millar-Holder Trunk Sewer 3-25-59 S&L $1,898,682 N.Artukovich $1.846,870.00 4159 8-12-60 $1,967,532.61
3-3R-1 Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder
Trunk Sewer.Station 796+83 8-30-83 OCSD $35,000 George Millar $37,777.00 9.14-83 11-9-83 $37,777.00
3-4-A Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 4-22-59 B&L 51,470,960 Dakovlch $1,363,107.50 5-14-59 6.29-60 $1,374.155.78
3-4A Repairs to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer S&L $59,450 J.S.Barren (Tim.and Material.) 1961
3.4A-R Remedial Work to Miller-Holder
Trunk Sewer 9-5-63 B&L $67,532 TALL BIDS REJECTED-10-11-61)
District 3-Page 1
[ / l [ : l ! ! ( [ [ [ [ 1 [ I [ [ [ [ [
3t94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEEfl ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT ANIT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
3.48 Mlller-Holder Trunk Sewer 8-10-59 B&L $723,690 Dartmen Conan. 9628,880.00 6.17-59 7.23-80 $634,130.57
34C Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 9-9-59 B&L $181,209 Leo Weiler $143,253.87 9-23-59 10-21-60 $143.826.24
3.4D East Imperial Highway Trunk Sewer 8-29-60 B&L $67,041 Vukolevioh1Kordiok $73,941.48 7.28.60 10-10.80 473,600.48
3-5 Hoover-Western Subtrunk Sewer,
Sugar Branch,Trask Branch and
Lampoon Branch 3-25-69 B&L $653,205 Valley Engine. 9596.059.00 4.8.59 4.20-60 $602,487.91
3.6 Orange-Western Subtrunk Sewer 10.1459 S&L 0309,865 Dorfman Const. $378,640.00 11-27-59 12-29-60 0394,887.40
3-7 Artesia Branch Subtrunk Sewer 11-12.69 S&L $132,001 J.S. Barrett $107,918.99 11.2459 4-20-60 $107,734.99
3.8 Los Alamitos Subtrunk Sewer 2.10.60 S&L 01.078,572 Dorfman Conan. $831,346.80 3-30-60 4.10.61 $834,552.52
3-8R-1 Manhole Replacement, Los Alamitos
Subtrunk Sewer 413.76 OCSD 915,000 George Mills, $14,999.00 4-14-76 9.8.76 $14,999.00
3-9 Magnolia Relief Sewer 4.27.60 S&L $533.070 J.S.Barrett 4853,4e6.36 5.26.60 1-11-51 $656,597.90
3-10 MlllavHolder Trunk Sewer 9-2"S B&L $286.953 Johnson Const. $263.119.50 9.8.55 4-30-66 $270,317.75
3-11 (Weateide Interceptor Facilities)Seal
Beach Blvd.Intercepter Sewer 5-8-70 Boyle $651.369 2arubica Co. $602,780.67 5-13-70 1.13.71 $604,320.43
3-11 R Seal Beach Blvd.Intercepter Sewer
Manhole Rehabilitation DGA
3.12 IWectside Interceptor Facilities) Los
Alamitos Pumping Station 5.8.70 Boyle $375,000 Marco Const. $330,000.00 5.13-70 5-12-71 $337,553.41
3-12A Ten-Inch Vertical Sewage Pump 2-26-71 OCSD $3,200 John Stang $3,279.15 2-10-71 3.1-71 $3,279.15
3-12A-1 Piping for Installation of No.3 Pump
at Seal Beech Blvd.Pump Station 6.29-71 OCSD Kelly Pipe $4,119.61 7-14-71 $4,119.61
District 3-Page 2
REVISION DATE: 3/94
DISTRICT CONTRACTS
DISTRICT NO. 3
DATE FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
3-00 Alterations to Hazard Avenue Sulfide
Control Station 9-23-64 B.&L.' $8,400 Wiggs Contr. $10,334.00 9.30-64 12-9-64 $10,334.00
3-00-1 Abandon Hazard Avenue Sulfide
Control Station OCSD (Purchase Order contract with Anaheim Sewer Construction)
30008 Conversion of Westside Pump Station Force Account 601
30008-Al Piping for Westeide Pump Station
Conversion Keenan Pipe 3-12-71
3-1 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer and
Bushard Relief Sewer 12-17-58 B&L $3.155,390 J. S. Barrett $2,667.727.50 12-10-58 12.18-59 $2,657,829.71
3-1R-1 Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk 1-6.77 OCSD 430,000 BIDS REJECTED (Later incorporated into Cont.3-1R-3)
3.1 R-2 Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk 12-16-76 OCSD $30.000 Rewes-Schock 940,078.00 1.12-77 4.13.77 440,435.50
3-1R-3 Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole
Shells, Miller-Holder Trunk 5.3.77 OCSD $32.900 F.S.Cook $48,431.20 7.29.77 412.78 $55,761.88
3.1 R-4 Repair of Manholes on Miller-Holder
Trunk (Negotiated Contract not to exceed 445,000--job never completed)
3.2 Millar-Holder Trunk Sewer 2.25.59 B&L $1,713,250 Steve Rados 01,647,860.00 3-26-59 6-25-60 $1,603,273.64
3-2R-1 Manhole Repair, Miller-liolder
Trunk 1-8-80 Brennen $55.000 Peter C. David $83.610.00 2-13-80 12-10.80 $108.232.59
3.3 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 3.25.59 B&L $1,898,682 N.Artukovich $1.846,870.00 4/59 8.12-60 $1,867,532.61
3.3R-1 Manhole Repair,Miller-Holder
Trunk Sewer. Station 796483 8.30-83 OCSD $35,000 George Miller 037,777.00 9.14-83 11-9-83 $37,777.00
3-4-A Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 4-22-59 S&L $1,470,960 Dekovich $1,363.107.50 5.14.59 6-29-80 $1,374,155.78
3.4A Repairs to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer B&L $59,450 J.S.Barrett (Time and Matedelsl 1961
3-4A-R Remedial Work to Miller-Holder
Trunk Sewer 9-5-63 S&L 967,532 (ALL BIDS REJECTED--10.11-61)
District 3-Page 1
It [ t [ [ It [ 1 I 0 1 [ 9 [ 1 Q Q
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
3-12-1 Addition.to Seal Beech Blvd.
Pump Station 6-5.73 Boyle $120,000 Jenkins Coma. $112,568.00 6-13-73 2-13-74 $112,568.00
3-12-2 Additions to Seal Beach Blvd.
Pump Station 2-28-80 Boyle $482,000 Pascal&Ludwig 0423,548.00 3-12-80 8.12.81 $428,164.00
3-12.3 Seal Beach Pump Station Improve.
ments(paving and block well) 2.23.82 OCSD $101000 Constr.Engre. $8,400.00 3.10-82 6.9.82 $10,550.00
3-13 (WmA.Ka Interceptor Facilities)
Westminster Ave.Force Main(First
Unit) S.S.70 Boyle $485.222 J.L.Scott $388,449.20 B-10-70 3.10.71 $400,077.38
3-13R Repair of Westaide Interceptor
3.13R.1 Repair of Westaide Interceptor
3-13R-2 Replacement of Westminster Ave.
Force Mein(First Unit)
3.13.1 Westaide Interceptor Facilities,
Westminster Ave.Fore. Main(Second (Schedule B) Schedule B)
Unit) 7.27.78 Boyle $1.491.360 Colich&Sane $1,272.938.00 8-9-78 8.8-79 $1,279,838.00
3-14 (Westaide Interceptor Facilities) K.E.C.Co.&
Westminster Ave. Interceptor Sewer 6-24-70 Boyle $734,000 Keith Card 0790,270.00 6-30-70 7-15-70 $758,431.50
3-14R Urgency Manhole Replacement 6-7-88 OCSO $250,000 (BIDS REJECTED--Change order issued to on-site contractor-S. A. Healy $190,000.00l
3-15 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole
Repair 10-6-69 Boyle $71,270 Cook&Sedans 09,742.00 10-8-69 10-13-71 $86,200.75
3-16 Beech Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches
17, 18 and 19 (from Resume Ave.to
Rose....Ave.) 5.10.71 Boyle $517,990 Marco Coast. $453.122.00 5.12-71 4.12.72 $468,894.00
3-17 Knott Interceptor,a Portion of Reach
1 and Reaches 2 and 3
(Fed...I Grant No.C-06-0647-0101 3-9-72 Boyle $6,353,999 J.F. Shen $5,755,480 4-12-72 3.6-74 $5.812.053.70
3-17-1 Bole Relief Trunk Sewer,Reach 10
and Boles Avenue Storm Main 12-7.72 Boyle $372.000 McGuire Const. $382,414.00 1.3-73 10-10.73 $379,389.00
District 3-Page 3
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT.
3-18 Knott Interceptor, Reach 4
(Federal Grant No.C-06-0847-0101 410-73 Boyle 63,795,134 Tutor&Saliba $4,344,412.00 6.13-73 8-31-75 $4,503,450.00
3.18.1 Knott Interceptor Crossing of the
Westminster Flood Control Channel
(Federal Grant No. C-06.0647-010) 4.26-73 Boyle $45,000 R.L.Stuckey $59,670.00 5-2-73 7.11-73 $59,670.00
3-19 Imperial Relief Interceptor, Reaches
22 and 23 7-9-74 Boyle $597,903 Mika Prlich $832,372.00 8-1474 6-11-75 $777,943.00
3-20-1 Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 and 6 10-8-74 Boyle $4,735,905 Sully-Miller $4,602,992.00 10-16-74 1-31-76 $4,606.365.00
3-20-2 Knott Interceptor,Portion of Reach 7 12-31-74 Boyle $4,658,949 Tutor&Saliba $3,876,870.00 2-19-75 1-1-77 $3,966,095.40
3.20.3 Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7 12.&77 Boyle S4,418,000 Kordick&Rados 03,880,113.00 12-14-77 4-30-79 $3,900,107.94
3.20.4 Knott Interceptor, Reach 8 12-12.78 Boyle $1,700,000 J. Artukovich $1,472,450.00 12.13.78 9.28-79 $1,588.168.62
3.21-1 Wettable Relief Interceptor, Reaches
2S and 26 and a Portion of 27 6.3.75 Boyle $1,536,258 Tutor& Saliba $1,416.448.00 6.11.75 3-31-76 $1,439,251.00
3.21.1R Trench Repair,Wastside Relief
Interceptor 11.14.79 Boyle $22,500 G.R.Frost S20,825.00 11.14-79 4-9-80 $43,646.30
3-21-1R7 Trench Repair,Westside Relief
Interceptor -------Force Account Work by Wilson's Equipment Supply...........................
3-21-2 Wastside Relief Interceptor, Portion
of Reach 27 and Raaohe. 28 and
29 (from (etelle Ave.and Ludington
Dr.to Crescent Ave.) 4.6.76 Boyle $1,182,289 8&P Const. $1,177,745.00 4.14-76 4-22-77 S1,258,683.13
3-21-211 Trench Reconstruction, Los Alamitos
Boulevard 1.24.84 Keith $225,000 RicherdeonlLeBoue/ $213,699.00 2-8-84 4-11-84 $213,699.00
3-21.311 Trench Reconstruction, Los Alamitos
Boulevard, Phase 111 10-30-84 Keith $225,000 Copp Comr. $200,856.00 11-14-84 3-13-ES $206,040.88
3.22.1 Orengethorpe Relief Trunk Sower.
Reach 15 3.7.78 Boyle $702,150 Pascal&Ludwig $540,287.00 3-8-78 8-4-78 $547,066.60
District 3-Page 4
t t ! I t I : t ? H I I i H rf I t t [ : t I I i
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
3-22-2 Orongethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer,
Portion of Reach 16,Western Ave.
to Thomas St. 2-5-80 Boyle 01,137,910 Mayem Const. $1,112,090.00 2-13.80 8-13-80 $1,160,209.12
3-22-3 OranBethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer,
Reach 16A 5-6-80 Boyle $1,798,357 DidoAc&Zarubice $1,508,939.55 5.1"O "-at $1,597,455.40
3-23R Manhole Repair, Knott Interceptor
Sewer S-17-83 OCSD $5.000 Sancon Engrg. $5,000.00 6-8-83 9-1"3 $5,000-00
3-23R-1 Replacement and Now Frame and
Cover at Magnolia Trunk Sewer 12.9.80 Lowry $6.500 CK Pump $5,235000 12-10-80 3-12-81 $5.235.00
3.24.1 Kettle Interceptor Sewer 4.24.84 Lowry $362.000 KEC Co. $345,567.00 5.9.84 11-1 4-84 $348.947.80
3-24-2 Lampson Interceptor Sewer 7-16-91 Lowry $1,000,000 Peter C.David $881,000.00 8-14-91 2-10-93 01,036,542.71
3-25 Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief
Sewer Lowry
3.28R Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 5.29.84 Fmkert $850,000 Pdich&Son. $824,240.00 6-13-84 7-10-85 $871,617.08
3.28R.1 Rehabilitation of 74 Manholes on the
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 12-16-86 Fortran $4.000.000 Mladen Buntich $4,327.000.00 4-8-87 11-1-89 $4.462.640.94
3-29R Manhole Repair—Knott Interceptor
Sewer 4-23-85 Hone $102,500 Sancon Engrg. $70,700.00 5-8-85 8-14-85 $71,650.00
3-30 Elimination of Direct Connections to
Knott Interceptor Sower 8-26.86 Keith $50,000 JWM Engrg. $45,229.00 9.10-96 12-15.86 $45,229.00
3-31 Repair of We.tside Relief Interceptor
and Loa Alamitos Subtrunk Sewer 8-487 Daniel Boyle $180,000 (Project never bid)
3-31(Rebid) Repair of Westside Relief Inter-
ceptor and Los Alamitos Subtrunk
Sewer Replacement 9-22-87 Daniel Boyle $200.000 Advanco $237,617.00 11-2487 5-11-88 $267.457037
3.32R Emergency Repairs to Millar-Holder
TruMc Sewer, Le Habra Push...
Section,Line."V and'W' Don Greek $45,000 --Force Account Work----
District 3-Page 5
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
3-3211-1 Abandonment of Miller-Holder Trunk
Sower, Le Habra Purchase Section,
Line"W^ Don Greek $65,000 ---Force Account Work under Emergency Repair Contract---
3-3311 Rehabilitation of Manholes on Miller-
Held.,T.&Sewer 3-20-90 OGA Assoc. $3,500.000 Saneon Engrg. 52,253,300.00 4I1.90 1-9-91 $2,317.183.39
33411 Manhole Adjustments and Street
Repairs on Knott Interceptor Sewer 7.19-88 Keith $250,000 Mleden Suntich $369,010.00 9-14-88 10-11.89 3369,010.00
3-35R Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk
Sewer, Orangewood Ave.to Ellis Ave. DGA
3-36 Repair and Sampling of Westminster
Avenue Fore.Me.(Units 1 and 21
3-36R Replacement of Westminster Avenue
Force Maine(Unite 1 and 21
3-37 Modifications to Pomona of Magnolia
Relief Trunk, Orangethorpe Relief
Trunk and Magnolia Trunk Sewer for
1-5 Widening Project,Segment E
(Construction to be done by CALTRANSI
3-38 Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk
Sewer System Boyle $10,300,000
District 3-Page 6
REVISION DATE: 3194
DISTRICT CONTRACTS
DISTRICT NO, 5
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
(First Number of Record)
5-6 Newport Beech Trunk'S', Unit One
and J.O.S. (Section Ono Connection
Trunk Sewer.) 422-53 OCSD J&N Anukovich $101,755.10 4-29-53 2-2454 $102.725.90
5-7 Newport Beech Trunk-B', Unit 2 Harriman.
end 3 3-25-53 Ferguson& $120,000 S.Lszaravich $123,176.00 4-20-53 1-13-54 $125,446.04
Carollo
5.8 Sewer Trunk"S'. Unit No.5 5-22-59 Southworth 6123.656 Pacific Pipe $82.307.04 5-28.59 12.30-59 $84,158.04
5-8-R Slip-Uning of Trunk B, Unit 5. Rocky Roddirg and
Point to Udo Pump Stations 3-30-78 OCSD 0225.000 Cleaning Mach. $216.114.25 4-12.78 9-30-78 $228.139.01
5.9 Pressure Trunk"B" 2-26-58 Southworth Dorfman Const. $173,895.00 3-27-58 11.12.58 $174.705.06
5.10 Rocky Point Pumping Station 3-2454 OCSD Bove.&Crop $3.291.95 3-24-54 5-26-54 $3,291.95
5.11 Bayside Pump Station 4-22-60 Boyle 046,701 A.Famulero $33.089.25 422-60 9-2-60 $34.180.25
5-12 Coast Highway Trunk Sewer and Bey Simpson&
&id8a flmping Station 9-1-65 Stevlingeon $426.920 J.Gelle.her $698.669.65 9-27-65 410-65 9491.175.99
5-12A Sewage Pump, Orly.and Marc,, Bey
Bridge Pump Station 10-25-67 OCSD Fairbanks Morse $12,068.70 10.26-67 4.20-68 512,068.70
5-12B Sewage Pump and Drive Shaft,Bay
Bridge Pumping Station 4.6.71 OCSD Fairbanks Morse t14,179.20 4-1G-71 10-9-72 $13,554.20
5.12E-1 Piping for Installation of No.4 Pump
at Bey Bridge Pumping Station 6-29-71 OCSD Kelly Pipe $5,152.00 7.14-71 $5,152.00
5.12.1 Demolition and Removal of Old Bay
Bridge Pumping Station 4-21-67 Simpson $3,000 GanBi Ezcay. 61,960.00 4.27-67 5.31-67 $1,960.00
District 5-Page 1
( 1 [ I l H 1 H f t E [ Y Y H I I 1 1
V94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
5-12-2 Rehabilitation of Pacific Coast
Highway Trunk Sewer from Dover Sheller&
Drive to Rocky Point Pump Station 11-24-e1 Loh, $700,000 Advance Const. $405,790.00 12-9-81 4-13-83 $412,509.14
5-13 Trunk Sewer--Beck Bey Drive to
Pacific Coast Highway 11-7-66 Simpson $290.000 Far Western $217,370-35 11-21.66 3.8.67 $214,828.96
5-14R Manhole Replacement and Repair
Program 11-7-66 Simpson $80,000 AAA Const. $40,980.00 11-21-68 4-27-57 $42,180.60
5-14R.2 Manhole Replacement and Repeir
Program, Phase ll 12-5-67 Simpson $31,900 Power Const. $27,945.00 12-13-67 4-30-68 $28,365.00
5-1411-3 Manhole Replacement and Repair 6-5-74 OCSD $25,000 Rawes-Schock $24,079.29 6-12-74 8-14-74 $24,079.29
5-14R.4 Manhole Replacement and Repair 9-4-74 OCSD $60,000 Rewes.Schock $49,047.26 9.11-74 12-11-74 $49.047.14
5-14R.5 Manhole Replacement and Repair (BIDS REJECTED 12-11-74. REBID UNDER CONTRACT NO.5-1411-510
5-14R-SR Manhole Replacement and Repair 1-30-75 OCSD $40,000 Rewes-Schock $35.365.53 2.19-75 4-30-75 $35.365.53
5-1411-6 Wetwell Repair and Remodeling at
14th St.and"A"St.Pumping Iper GM)
Stations 5-20-75 OCSD $17.000 Rewes-Schock $22.90.36 6-11-75 8-13-75 $18.000.00
5.15 Bitter Point Pump Station Shuirmen
Reconstruction 1-16.68 Simpson $25.000 Power Const. $22.100.00 1-25-68 4-5-68 $22,100.00
5-16 Reconstruction of Lido Pump Shuirmen
Station(Fed.Grant C13536) 1-21.69 Simpson $20,000 B&M Eacev. $20,194.00 1-23-69 8-13-69 $23,342.07
5-17 Sewage Pumps. Drive and Motor-- Shuirman
Jamboree Pumping Station 4-2-69 Simpson $12,500 Allied Pump $13,039.75 4-9-69 10-10-69 $13,039.75
5-18 Sewer Trunk"8'--Unit 7, Upper Shulman
Newport Beach Crossing 11-9-70 Simpson $250,000 turn Engrs. $336,400.00 11-24-70 10-27-71 $327,573.00
5-1811 Relocation and Repair of a Portion
of the Bay Bridge Force Mein in Schaller Contractor requested release from contract.
Pacific Coast Highway 7.13-82 & Lohr $830,000 Kordick,JV $595,018.00 Bids rejected 8-11-82. To be rabid at a later
date.
District 5-Page 2
3/94
it
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
5-1811 Rehabilitation and Rol...Can of
(Rabid) Pacific Coast Highway Sewer from
Bey Bridge Pump Station to Dover Sheller
Drive 2.22-93 &Lahr $825,000 Russco Coast. $936.585.40 413-83 3-15-84 $862,060.35
5-19 Sewer Trunk"W--Unit 8, Pacific Shulman
Coast Highway Force Mein 8-1-72 Simpson $783,100 Tutor&Saliba $678.500.00 B-9.72 9-12-73 $790.333.00
5.19-111 Repair of a Portion of Sewer Trunk B
(Emergency measural Emergency Purchase Oder No. 18276 to KEC Co.in the amount of 4126,866.82--2.13-851
5-19-112 Replacement of Portions of'S"Trunk
Sewer, East to Santa Ana River
Junction Structure to Bitter Point
Pump Station 6-25-85 Forkerr $560.000 J.T. Malloy,JV 9420,710.00 8-30.85 4-9-96 d634,206.21
5-19-R3 Replacement of Portions of B Trunk
Sewer, Bitter Point Pump Station
to the Valve(combined with 5.26 for
construction economies) 12.19-86 Church 0980,000 Advenco Coast. $823,750.00 1.14-87 10.14.87 $831,263.32
5-20 Beck Bay Trunk Sewer (Project denied by Coastal Commiaeion 9.8.76)
5.20A Back Bay Trunk Sewer(East Side) Simpson&
(Material Purchase Only) 7-7-76 Stepper $260,000 U.S. Pipe $184,754.25 7-14-76 7-13-77 $213,305.02
5-21 Santa Ana River Siphon 5-8-79 L.0.King $350,000 A.W.Davies $357,000.00 5.9.79 10-10-79 $373,940.11
5-21-1 Construction of"A" and'S'Trunk
Sewer Poeilities,Schedule A.
Alternate Alignment within Plant 2,
Schedule B. Junction Structure Sheller&
connection oast aide Sent.Ana River 3.11.80 Lahr $950,000 Colich&Sons 6729,000.00 3-12-80 6-10 81 $761,426.17
5.21-1R Improvements to the'A' and -W Trunk
Sewer Facilities Work completed under Change Order 1.Job No. P2-25.1B(8/82)
5-21-1 R1 Slide Gate Installation,"A"and "B' Malloy&
Trunk Sewer 4-24.84 OCSD $100,000 Malloy, Inc. $51,000.00 4-11-84
District 5-Page 3
I I I I I I I I ! ¢ Y I € d I d d Il I , I
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT.
5-22 Sayslde Drive Trunk Sewer and
Bayslde Drive Water Main, Street
and Drainage Improvements IC-21291 3.4.80 Forkert $900.000 Callen&Serve $654,375.00 3.12-80 1-14-81 $726.557.06
5-23 end Reconstruction of Peninsula Trunk at
6-7 Short Street(5-23) and Abandonment
of Newport Trunk Meter Vault at
"The Arches" 16-7f 11-20-80 Brennen 660,000 (Bide rejected on 12-10-80. Rebid separately on 2-3-81)
5-23 Reconstruction of Peninsula Trunk at
Short Street(Schedule A) 2.3.81 Brennan $60.000 J. Anukovich $62,500.00 2-11-81 5-13-81 $62,500.00
5-23-1 Rehabilitation of Peninsula Trunk from
'A' Street Pump Station to"G"Street Completed by City of Newport Beach and transferred to city
5-24 Beck Bay Trunk Sewer, Newport Dunes Sheller&
to Jamboree Pump Station 6-23.81 Lahr $1,000,000 Pascal&Ludwig $579,550.00 7-8-81 12.9-81 $637,629.56
5.24A Beck Bey Trunk Sewer(Materiel
Purchase Only) 5-23-81 OCSD $200,000 U.S.Pip. $199,261.95 7-8-81 4-14.62 0228,063.24
5.24E Installation of Protective Coating in
Back Bey Sewer Pipe P086589 OCSD Vulcan Painters $5.95/1-F $29,750.00
5-241 Big Canyon Marsh Restoration
Project 6.23-81 Hanger $200,000 J.Am.kovich $209,300.00 7-8-81 11.11-81 $231,221.60
5.24.2 Landscape Plan for Big Canyon Marsh No bid. received. GM to negotiate contract in amount not to exceed$35,000.
Restoration Project 8.25.81 $25,000 Smith Reynolds
2.25 Modifications to Pacific Coast Highway 6-22-82 Sheller $110,000 C. K.Pump $133,462.00 7-14.82
5.26 Replacement of Lido Force Mein 12-18 86 LIMA $970.000 Advance Const. 6968,200.00 1-14-87 10.14-87 $987,494.08
5-27 Balboa Trunk Sewer between Lido
Pump Station at Short Street and "A"
Street Pump Station located on Coastline
Balboa Peninsula 4-22.88 RBF $100.000 Construction $91,200.00 5-11-88 12-16-88 $88,200.00
5-27-1 Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, National Plant
between 32nd St.and Coronado St. 9.19-89 RBF $93,000 Services $30,800.00 10-11-89 5-9-90 $30,800.00
District 5-Page 4
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
5.28 Removal of SaWIde Pump Station Pomona Valley
and Jamboree Pump Station 9-23-86 Forkert $50,000 Equip.Rentals $68,128.00 10-29.86 4-8-87 $66,432.00
5-29 Replacement of Portions of Coast
Highway Force Main and Gravity
Sewer(combined Cont.5-29-1
eM 5.29-2 into one cooperative
project with City of Newport Beech) 3.1.88 RBF $4,800.000 W. H. Ebert $6.282.704.00 3-9-88 4-18-89 $6,867.819.50
5-30R Emergency Repairs to Coast Highway
Force Main and Bitter Point Pump
Station(between PCH end pump
station) Force Account work
$137,985.21
5-31 Replacement of Portions of Coast Chrieteve
Highway Force Mein 11-22-88 RBF $1,680,000 Corporation $1,491,434.00 12-14-88 5.5-89 $1,655.111.00
5-32 Improvements to Bitter Point and
Rocky Point Pump Stations
and
5-33 Improvemente to Bey Bridge Pump
Station 9-15-92 RBF $1.850,000 Uhler, Inc. $1.765,757.00 10-14-92
5-34 Improvements to Bayside Drive
Trunk Sewer(Prime Number) Design Only RBF
5-34-1 Phase I Improvements to Bayside Originally scheduled to be constructed with City of Newport Beach within PCH widening project--deleted and added to 5.34.2 by change
Drive Trunk Sewer order.
5.34-2 Phase 2Improvements to Bayside
Drive Trunk Sewer 12-19-89 RBF 82,800.000 Kenko. Inc. $1,959,690.00 1.10.90 3-13-91 $2,377,455.00
5-343 Phase 3 Improvements to Boyside Silveri&
Drive Trunk Sewer 7-16.91 RBF $4,500,000 LeSouef,JV 63,267,992.00 8-14-91 5.12.93 $4.757,710.00
5-35 South Coast Trunk Sewer Design Only The Keith
(Prima Number) Companies
5.35.1 Phase I, South Coast Trunk Sewer 5-15.90 Keith Co. $1,250.000 W.H.Ebert $8801660.00 6-13-90 1-9-91 31,003,065.88
5.35.2 Phase 2, South Coast Trunk Sewer 11-17-92 Keith Co. $2,200,000 Mike Prlich&Sons $1.667,559.00 12-9.92
District 5-Page 5
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT,
5.38 Crystal Cove Pump Station 4-13-93 Keith Co. $1,000,000 Schuler Engrg. $933,442.00 5-12-93
5-37 Improvements to Plan 401 Sewer,
in Pacific Coast Highway between
Dover Drive and Bitter Point Pump
Station) Project Report RBF
5.37-1 Repdn to a Portion of PCH Gravity
Sewer,West of Dover Drive (Purchase Order with Christeve Corp. $26,031.00 8-9-891
5-37.2 Investigation of PCH Gravity Sewer 9.19-89 RBF $100,000 Nat'l Rant Services $77,521.40 10-11-89 S-9.90 $78,826.40
5-37-3 Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway
Gravity Sewer,between Bitter Point
Pump Station and The Arches Boyle
5-37-4 Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway
Gravity Sewer,between The Arches
and Dover Drive 6.15.93 Boyle $1,800,000 Colich&Sone 61,674,539.00 7.14.93
5.38 Siphon at Proposed Crossing of Santa
Ana River South of 19th Street Boyle
5-39 Modifications to Districts 5 and 6
Siphon and Santa Ana River Siphon
et Plant No. 2 Boyle (Constructed by Steve P.Rados In Corps of Engineers Meinslem Project)
5-40 Upgrade Corona del Met Pump Station
and Force Main in Poppy Street and Pump (Construction Included in Cont.5.34.3 for construction economies)
Station at Cameo Highlands RBF 8-14-91 5-12-93 4715,116.00
District 5-Page 8
REVISION DATE: 3194
DISTRICT CONTRACTS
DISTRICT NO,6
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT.
(First Number of Record)
6-5 Newport Boulevard Trunk Sewer,
17th St.Trunk Sewer and Old
Santa Ana Road Trunk Sewer 7-9-52 OCSD J. S.Barrett S221,277.06 7-9-52 3-13-53 S216,459.00
6-6 Rocky Point Pumping Station
Reconstruction Cook&
(Fad. Grant C-13536) 9.19.66 OCSD $25,000 Barletta S24,058.00 10-13-66 3-8-67 $24.358.00
6-7 Abandonment of Newport Trunk
Meter Vault at The Arches
ISchedule 6) Bid with 5-23.
Bids rejected 12-10-80.
Rebid Separately 2.3-81 2-3-81 Brennan 420,000 Pascal& Ludwig $10,758.00 2-11-81 6 1081 $10,758.00
6-8 Abandonment of the Dover Drive
Trunk Meter Vault and Connection
Sewer 1-6-81 OCSD $24.800 Gillespie $28,777.00 1.14.81 513-81 $28.777.00
6-9 Fairview-Gisler Trunk
(redesigned and included in S.121 Boyle
6-10 Harbor Relief Sewer
6-11 Temporary Realignment of Northerly Psomas&
Trunk Sewer at Baker and Fairview Assoc. (Developer paid for construction)
6-12 Fairview Relief Sewer Boyle
6-13 Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers
and Construction of Watson Avenue
Sewer and California Street Sewer Boyle
District 6-Page 1
1 1 I [ [ l [ [ l I [ 1 [ [ l 1 I l I
REVISION DATE: 3194
DISTRICT CONTRACTS
DISTRICT NO.7
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR--- CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
Batavia Grove Purchase(Fullerton,
Brae Trunk Pumhacel
7-1A "Schedule A' Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer 4-13-60 B&L $172,507 Berdoco $197,971.00 4.13-60 12.5-W $197.766.50
7-18 "Schedule B' Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer 4-13-60 B&L $418,598 J.S.Barrett $431.647.50 4.13-60 10.6-60 $432,449.42
7-18.1 Abandonment of Portion of MacArthur
Trunk Sewer within John Wayne Airport 7-20-92 OCSD 460,000 Collett 862,000.00 8-12-92 12-9-92 $62,000.00
7.1C 'Schedule C' Gisler-Rod Hill Trunk Sewer 11.1-67 S&L $278.885 Zombies $223.868.32 11-8-67 7-5-68 $227,178.95
7-1C-1 College Avenue Pump Station and Force
Main
7-1-D MacArthur Pumping Station and Force
Main
7.1 E Subtrunka 410-63 S&L 840,680 (All Bids Rejected--Rebid under 7-1E Revised)
7.1E Subtrunks 4.15-64 S&L $137,690 Anro Const. $119,190.00 4-18-64 9.21-64 $135,266.00
Revised
7-1F College Avenue Subtrunk,Unit 1 and Southworth
Greenville-Sanning Trunk Sewer 10-6-SS &Stevens $37,000 OC Pipeline $34,269.50 10-7-65 10-22.65 033,563.16
7-1 F-1 Relocation of College Avenue Subtrunk
Sewer(Unit 1) (Home Ranch Project) IUns to be paid for by developer ISegamtroml for Home Ranch Project)
7-IF-A Collage Avenue Subtrunk Sewer and
South Coast Plaza Subtrunk Sewer 9-14-66 Boyle OC Pipeline 535,292.10 10.31-66 $36.472.90
(Reimbursement Agreement-617.531.40)
7-1F-B South Coact Maze Subtrunk Extension
IRA34) 9-23-69 Boyle $41,000 B.Counts $33,000.50 9.23.69
7-1G-A Smalley Road Subtrunk Sewer 10-11-68 Stevens $49.000 Scott Bros. $38,391.10 5-14-69 $39,965.10
District 7-Page 1
l l [ [ I [ l € [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT,
71-11t Repairs to Gisler Trunk, Infiltration
Reduction 6.5.74 OCSD Gala.Grouting $5,390.87 6.12-74 8-1474 $9,165.87
7-1-1 Abandon Portion of Gider-Red Hill Trunk
Sewer,from Bristol to 55 Freeway
7-1-2 Relocation of Gialar-Red Hill Siphon under
the Sena Ans-Da1N Channel Boyle
7-2 Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sawa, 4-11.62 B&L $618,535 J.MacDonald 8566,584.06 4-13.62 3-1-63 $566,576.98
7-2A;3C
and 3D Subtrunks 1-18.63 B&L 8340,805 Bosko 8316,928.00 1.30.63 9.3-63 $334.833.02
7-2AP Neal Way Sewage Pumping Station and
Force Main 4-10-63 S&L $47.667 Hydro Coast. $48.492.30 418-63 9.10.63 $49.213.98
7-2AP-1 Navy Way Fore,Main Sewer 12-3-69 Boyle $41.104 Scott Bros. 638,600.00 12.10-69 430-70 $39.719.64
7-2AP-2 Remodeling of Navy Way Pumping
Station--Phasel 11-6-69 Boyle $11.700 Kisling Cons. $12.385.00 11-12.69 3-17-70 $14,295.54
7-2-B South Coast Plaza Subtrunk and Walnut Boyle&
Avenue Subtrunk 6-26.65 Lowry $82.115 Famco Cons. $69,260.50 6.9.65 12-8-65 $69,643.90
7-2-C Lane Road Subtrunk Sewer 2-24-67 Lowry $72,522 Irvine Ind.& For
Western $72,184.25 3-1-67
7-2C-1 Mein Street Subtrunk East,Reaches 41
and 42 IRA 39)
7-2C-2 Jamboree Boulevard Subtrunk No. 1.
Reach 47 IRA 39)
7-2C.3 Main Street&Von Karmen IT.t 7843)
IRA 39)
7.2C.4 Main Street Trunk Sewer 6-25-85 Boyle $2,860,000 Bubaio Cons. 62,240,920.00 7-10-85 6-11-86 02,406,374.79
7-2C-P Lane Road Sewage Lift Station IRA 28) 5-25-67 Lowry 4651000 For Western
7-20-1 McGaw Avenue and Armstrong Avenue
Subtrunk Sewer IRA 32)
7-2D-2 McGaw Avenue Subtrvnk Sewer(RA37)
District 7-Page 2
1 I [ 1 [ [ [ ( [ [ l [ [ [ [ [ [ 1 [
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE 810 DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTAMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
7-20.3 Von Karmen Avenue Subtrunk Sewer IRA 37)
7.20-4 McGew Avenue Subtrunk,Reach 49 IRA 39)
7.20-5 Jamboree Blvd.Subtrunk No.2, Reach 521RA 39)
7-2D-6 Jamboree Blvd.Subtmnk No.2, Reach 531RA 39)
7-2D-7 Jamboree Blvd.Subtrunk No.2. Reach 53 IRA 40)
7-2D-P McGew Avenue Sewage Uft Station IRA 35)
7.2-R Red Hill Relief Trunk Sower 5.27.69 Boyle $518,956 2arubica $492,391.20 5-27-89 1-23-70 $496,212.43
7-2-Rl Red Hill Relief Trunk Sewer, Manhole
Cover Replacement 7-26-77 OCSD $10,000 M.Nottingham 48,595.00 a-10-77 11-25.77 $11,177.00
7.3 Lemon Heights Trunk Sewer 4-23-62 B&L $267,785 Stele,Inc. 8216,871.40 4-27-62 6-3-53 $219.428.73
7.3A.-4A Subtrunk. 9-20-62 B&L $164,410 DeLeon $133,872.17 9-21.62 3.8.63 $139,077.83
7-3A-1 Diversion Structure. 2.5.74 Boyle $30,912 Helopoff $25.978.40 2.13-74 5-8.74 $27,732.88
7.3A-2 "
7.38.1 "
7.3E-1 '
7.313 Subtrunk. 2-13-63 B&L 0400,550 Howard Sewer $307.616.50 12-7-62 7-10-63 0308,361.14
7.3E Subtrunk. 5-8.63 R&L $125,950 AAA Const. 4104,455.00 5-17-63 10-1-63 $103,840.72
7.3E-2 Irvine-Newpon Subtrunk Relief Sewer 12-10-91 OCSD 9200,000 Colich&Sons $177,692.00 1-8-92 6-12-92 $270,099.00
7-48&
7-41) Subtrunk. 2.13.63 B&L 0117,200 Books Const. $109,832.00 2.20-63 9-3-63 $107,275.22
7-4C Subttunke 1.4.83 S&L $85,810 OC Sewer. $93,392.00 1.9-63 4.30.63 $99,201.09
7.4-1 North Trunk Sewer 5-16-62 B&L $365,245 Books Canal. $379,000.00 5.25.62 3.1.63 $390,880.42
7-4.2 North Trunk Sewer and West Trunk
Sewer 7.13-62 B&L 8250,750 JPS Cont. 8242,915.00 7.18-62 7.3.63 $244,059.93
7-4-2A Subtrunk. 7.1.64 B&L $39,495 E.Vessels $30,295.00 74-84 9-30-64 $33,013.69
7.4.2R Tustin-Newport Relief Subtrunk Sewer 9-3.69 B&L $41.851 S.Clume $41,528.45 9-10-69 2-11-70 040,694.80
District -Page 3
[ l [ [ I l
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
7-5-111 West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches IS,
20 and 22, Red Hill Ave.to Tustin 8-2472 Boyle $605,000 Bomar Const. $472,680.00 9.13-72 8-17-73 $456,661.18
7.5A.1 Fourth Street Bypass Sewer 4-26-66 B&L $32,825 E.Sellere $21,445A0 4-26-66 8-4-66 $21,619.50
7-5A-2 Tustin Avenue Sewer 8-3-66 B&L $27,608 M.Mitrovich $23,303.00 8-4-66 10.14-66 $24,275.00
7-5-2 West Trunk Sewer 10-10-62 B&L $112,800 Stele,Inc. $91,526.60 10-19-62 4.30.63 $98,529.20
7-5.2B Portion of Cont.7-5.2(assigned) B&L VanDiest Bros. $76,648.36 11-3-62 4.30.63 $82,514.98
7-5.3 Waet Trunk Bypass Sewer 7-8-64 B&L $31,951 Kordick&Son $21,322.00 7-8-64 10-1-64 $20,931.00
7.6.1 Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1
(Treatment Plant No. 1 to Bear Street) 2-17.71 Boyle $3,112,000 SullyMiller $2,290,481.00 2-23-71 3-25-72 $2,291,334.38
7-6-1-1 Modifications to Sunflower Interceptor
Crossing under the Santa Ana River
(in conjunction wiht Corps of Engineers/
OC EMA Mainstem Project)
7-6-1 A Bear Street Relief Trunk Sewer from
South Coast Plaza to Sunflower)(west
side) (Agreement with A&R Developers--to serve South Coast Plaza Expansion) 8-86
7-6-2 Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 2 from
Baer Street to Main Street 4.7-71 Boyle $1,424,843 E.Fastens $1,278,238.00 4-14.71 3.15-72 $1,287,269.00
7.6.2A Plaza Drive Subhunk Sewer, Reach 39
(from Sunflower Ave.to MacArthur Blvd.)
IRA 38) (Agreement with City of Santa Ana and Segerstrom-Inspection only by OCSDI $44,064.12
7-6-213 Two Town Center Subtmnk Sewer
IRA 41) (Agreement with Two Town Center Associates-.6.10.81) $140,136.40
7-6-3 Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 3 and
Red Hill Interceptor, Reaches 4 and 5 9-12-71 Boyle $996,301 Colich&Suns 1,060,422.58 9-30-71 7-7-71 $1,062,044.84
District 7-Page 4
I 1 [ [ l I I [ ! [ l [ [ [ [ [ [ ! l
3/94
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT,
7-6.4 Red Hill Interceptor,Reaches 6,7
and 10-19-71 Boyle $578,000 Northern Comr. $486,108.70 10-27-72 5.31-72 $489,679.78
7-6-6 TustirmOrange Trunk Sewer,Reach 10 12-31-74 Boyle $664,177 McGuire Comet. $589,572.60 1-8-75 8.21.75 $581,749.90
7-6-7 Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer,Reach 11
and a portion of Reach 12 5-6.75 Boyle $480,272 Rogers 94 Davies $349,818.00 5-14-75 10-31-75 $348,626.00
7." Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer,Portion of
Reach 12,Reach 13 and a portion of
Reach 14 12-16-75 Boyle $587,620 Stave Bubslo $475,632.74 1.14-76 6.30-76 $520,453.00
7-6-9 Tustin-Orange Interceptor Sewer, Portion
of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 and 16 3-30-76 Boyle 0440,312 Sully-Millar 9295,826.40 4-14-76 8.31-78 $310,727.60
7.6.10 Tustin-Orange Interceptor Sewer. Portion
of Reach 17 and Reach 18 (City of Orange projec0
7-611 Tustin-Orange Interceptor Sewer, Portion
of Reach 19 (City of Orange projecg
7-7 Main Street Pump Station 7.30.85 Boyle $3,500,000 Advance Const. $2,901,162.00 8-14-85 3-11-87 $3,058,914.53
7-7-1 Improvements to Mein Street Pump
Station Boyle
7-8 Von Karmen Trunk Sewer 10-23-84 Boyle $5,200,000 Steve Babel. $5,325,000.00 11.1484 2.13-86 $5,439,090.16
7-9 Fairview Subtrunk Connection to the Wilson's Equipment
Sunflower Interceptor Sewer 10-27-87 RMG $50,000 Rental. $65,788.00 I1-18.87 2-10-88 $65,088.00
7-SMD-1 Manhole Repair, Red Hill Avenue 2-26-85 OCSD $25,000 (Bide were rejected. To be redesigned and rabid(
(Line brake after rebids were received; repaired under emergency purchase order authority)
7-10 North Airport Diversion Sewer(required
relocation of South Irvine Subtrunk
Sewer IRA 261 by County of Orange for
John Wayne Airport Expansion) 8-25-87 Boyle $600,000 N.Artukovich $571,960.00 10.13-7-87 3.9-88 $586,090.00
7.10-1 South Airport Diversion Sewer 7.1988 Boyle $500,000 Advance $594,010.00 12.14-88 3.13-89 $618,636.00
District 7-Page 5
3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
7.11 Modification and Abandonment of five
Diet No.7 Pump Stations(Prime No.) Design Only Boyle
7-11-1 Abandonment of Lena Road Pump Station
(Construction bid with 7-11-3) 11-28-89 Boyle $1,000,000 Colich&Hone $1,277,212.00 12-13.89 3.11-92 $1.357.872.00
7-11-2 Relocation of Michelson Pump Station 6-25-91 Boyle 61,950,000 Mitchell Pacific $1,827,136.00 7-17-91 10-14-92 $1.950.061.00
7-11.3 Abandonment of Coati arock and Dow
Avonue Pump Stations,and Modifications
to MacArthur Pump Station (Be.7-11-1)
7.12 Installation of a-Inch Force Mein at Derby Milo Wilson'. Equip.
2 Pump Station 11-15-88 Keith $65,000 Rentals, Inc. $81,901.28 12-14.88 4.26.89 $88,036.43
7.13 Campus Relief Sewer, between Von
Karmen Avenue and Jamboree Road 1-15-91 Church $850,000 Albert Davis.,Inc. 6481,616.00 2-13-91 6-12-91 $535,275.53
7-14 Abend onment of Nina District No.7 Pump
Stations(designed with 7-7-1)
Prime Number Design Only Boyle
7-14-1 AbarMonmant of Red Hill Pump Station
7.14-1.1 Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Silveri&
Ph... 1 9-15-92 $140,0()0 LeBouef,JV $90,732.00 10-14-92 5-12-93 $90,732.00
7-14-1-2 Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station,
Phase 2
7-14-2 Abandonment of Racquet Hill Pump
Station
7-14-3 Abandonment of Covey Lane Pump
Station
7.14-4 Abandonment of Lake Court Pump
Station
7.14.5 Abandonment of Derby No. 1 Pump
Station
7-14-6 Abandonment of Derby No. 2 Pump
Station
7.14.7 Abandonment of Bent Tree Pump
Station
7.14.8 Abandonment of Cowen Heights Pump
Station
7-149 Abandonment of Owrhill Pump Station
7-15 Crawford Canyon Realignment lconstmctod with Tract No.8489 by Cornlche Dev.1 IRelmbumement Agraamen0
District 7-Page 6
e e [ e e [ e [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ e e [
3M4
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
7-16 Lemon Heights Sewer System
(Study) Design Boyle
7-17 Replacement of a Portion of Orange Park
Acres Sewer,from Mercian Avenue to
Chapman Avenue Boyle
7-19 Orange Perk Acme Sewer System--
Master Plan Boyle
7-19 Cowen Heights Sewer Syetem--
Master Plan Boyle
7-20 Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main
and Replacement Gravity Sewer 7-13-93 Boyle $1,363,000 Polar C. David Co. $937,480.00 8-11-93
7-21 Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab-
ilitation(between Treatment Plant No. 1
antl )
7.22 Parallel end Replacement of Portions of
Lemon Heights Subtmnk System,Le Coline
Drive to Newport Blvd.
7.23 Gisler-Red Hill Parallel Force Main(from
College Avenue Pump Station to Iowa
St.) Boyle
7.24 Manhole Access Modifications to RA-14
Sewer at Newport Boulevard and Cowen
Heights Drive
District 7-Page 7
I t t [ [ [ [ I I
Updated: 3194
DISTRICT CONTRACTS
District No. 11
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
11.0 HUNTINGTON BEACH TRUNK SEWER 6-2453 Izzi Constr. 045.580.00 7-22.53 10-28-53 $45,580.00
11-00 HUNTINGTON BEACH SEWAGE
PUMPING PLANT 6-2453 F.J.Early $27,480.00 8-1-53 4-28-54 $27,480.00
11-1 NEWLAND-DELAWARE
GRAVITY TRUNK 11-5-58 L&O' G.DakoYlch $419,827.22 11-19.58 4.30-59 $425,469.29
11-1R-1 MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND
REPAIR, NEWLAND-DELAWARE
TRUNK 3.2-76 OCSD $46,000 Rewes-Schock $37,253.00 3-10-76 9.8-76 $35,382.00
11-2 ATLANTA AVENUE INTERCEPTOR 12-17-58 L&O' $48,330 J.Barrett $58.946.55 12-19-SB 3-30-59 $60,552.28
11-3 GOLDENWEST TRUNK UNIT 12-17-58 L& 0' $100,074 Dorfman Carat. $79.675.30 12-19.58 4.30-59 $82,899.94
11.3-1 INSTALLATION OF TWO MANHOLES Wilson's Equip
ON GOLDENWEST TRUNK SEWER 10-29-85 OCSD $48,500 Rental, Inc. $59,900.00 11-13-85 3-12-86 $60,765.00
11-4 HAMILTON AVENUE FORCE MAIN
AND NEWLAND STREET 1-7.59 L&O' $112,000 Waardco Cana[. $98,528.50 1-14-59 8.3.59 $100,665.35
PUMP STATION
11-4R REMODEL NEWLAND-HAMILTON
PUMPING STATION FACILITIES 10-30-75 OCSO $15,612 C.Thompaon $19,821.00 11.12-75 5-12-76 $21,193.26
11.5 GOLDENWEST PUMP STATION
AND FORCE MAIN 1.7.59 L& O' $111,500 Baltic Const. $109,956.38 1-14.59 8-21-59 $108,891.76
11-6 SLATER-SPRINGDALE TRUNK
SEWER 2-26-59 L&O' $422,863 Dorfman Comet. $338,202.00 3-26-59 B-21-59 $344,212.87
11.6A& CONSTRUCTION OF MANHOLES ON
11.IIA SPRINGDALE TRUNK SEWER 12.9.80 Lowry $10,500 G.R.Frost $15,000.00 1.6.81 4-8-81 $15,000.00
(11-6A) AND SLATER-SPRINGDALE RELIEF SEWER
(11-11A) - BID WITH 12-BA IREBIDI AND 3-23R.1 (BIDS WERE REJECTED AND LATER ASSIGNED TO G.R.FROST BY G.M.)
11-6R-1 MANHOLE REPAIR,
SLATER-SPRINGDALE TRUNK SEWER 1-27-77 $12,340 (ALL BIDS REJECTED-3.16-77)
District I I-Page 1
1 1 I [ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Updated: 3M4
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT
11-7 SMELTZER-BOLSA CHICA AND
SMELTZER LIFT STATION 2-25-59 L&O• $105.415 L.L.Dabkins $103,530.60 3-26-59 9-1-59 $104.775.01
11-8 NEWLAND STREET INTERCEPTOR 5-22-59 L& 0' $11,880 Wesrdo.Coast. 011,841.00 6-6-59 8-3-59 911,1141.00
11.9 EDINGER AVE GRAVITY SEWER
AND LIFT STATION 6-1-66 Lowry $135,580 O.C. Pipeline 9140,618.65 8-3-85 4-4-66 $142,234.68
11-10.1 SLATER AVE GRAVITY SEWER AND
NICHOLS ST GRAVITY SEWER 5-9-66 Lowry $158,240 O.C. Pipeline $116,594.30 5.11.68 9-23-66 $116,568.80
11-10-2 SLATER AVE GRAVITY SEWER AND
SLATER SEWAGE PUMPING STA. 9-12.66 Lowry $199,345 Lomas Corp. $251,692.05 9-14-66 3-23-67 $251.582.25
AND FORCE MAIN SEWER
11.10-2R SLATER AVE WET WELL REPAIR 12-6-73 Keith $11,145 F.B.Cook 914,856.63 12-19-73 1-e-75 829,371.93
11.10.3 MODIFICATIONS TO THE SLATER
AVENUE PUMP STATION AND 1-6.82 Keith 0175,000 KEC-Keith $118,030.00 1-13-82 6-9-82 0129,973.42
NEW FORCE MAIN
11.10-3R URGENCY REPAIRS TO SLATER
PUMP STATION 1-13-88 (Farce Account-not to exceed 9100,000-included in Contract No. 11.16 work)
11.11 SPRINGDALE AND EDINGER RELIEF
TRUNK SEWER 3-6-70 Keith $735,896 Selate Inc. 9710,700.00 3.11.70 9.13.70 9718,786.52
11-11-1 WARNER AVENUE RELIEF TRUNK,
PHASE I (PURCHASE FROM THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SEE RES.NO.77-108-111
11.11-2 WARNER AVENUE RELIEF TRUNK,
PHASE II (PURCHASE FROM THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH)
11-11R-1 MANHOLE RECONSTRUCTION,
PHASE) 5.1-68 Lowry $2.700 Cook& Barletta $5,250.00 5.8-68 9-11.68 8 5.250.00
11-12 SLATER AVENUE TRUNK SEWER
EXTENSION 1-8-74 Keith $476,815 Kordick& Son $419,000.50 1-9-74 7-10-74 $429,682.38
11-13.1 CHANGE ORDER TO P2-23-6 Keith
District 11-Page 2
t 1 I t t t t [ t t t t t t t t 1.
Updated: 3194
FINAL
JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT
11-13-2 COAST TRUNK SEWER,
REACH 1 AND 2,PORTION OF
NEWLAND ST INTERCEPTOR SEWER
AND LAKE AVE RELIEF SEWER
(Fed.Grant pC-06-1073-510) 8-9-79 Keith $7,500,000 J.Artokovich $7,488,964.53 9-12-79 2-11-81 $8,141,526.18
11-13-3 C0AST TRUNK SEWER,REACH 3 1-19-82 Lawry $3,900,000 S. Rebnln $3,040,623.00 4-14-92 9-14-83 $3,361,815.95
11-14 NEWLAND STREET INTERCEPTOR
SEWER 8-5-80 Keith $1,500,000 G. R. Frost $1,007,030.00 8-13-80 8-12-81 $1,011.265.00
11-15 INSTALLATION OF A 24-INCH
DUCTILE CAST IRON PARALLEL
FORCE MAIN IN SLATER AVENUE
11-16 REHABILITATION OF OCEAN AVENUE
TRUNK SEWER,LAKE STREET TO
GOLDEN WEST(before transferring
line to City of HE) F26.88 Boyle $600,000 Christeve Corp. $727.114.00 5-11-88 12-11-88 $790.263.46
11-17 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
Phase 1-Prelirninery Engineering Cerollo
Phase 2-Final Design Cerollo
11-17-1 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 9-10-93 Cerollo $6,500,000 Cohen&Sons $4,626,370.00 9-8.93
District 11-Page 3
t t t t t t e t c ! i t t
REVISION DATE: 3194
DISTRICT CONTRACTS
DISTRICT NO. 14
FINAL
JOB NO, TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT.
14.1 PROJECT REPORT ON JOINT SEWAGE
CONVEYANCE FACILITIES TO SERVE
DISTRICTS 8, 7 AND 14
(RESULTED IN 3 PROJECTS,CONTE.NOS.
14.1-1. 14-1.2 AND 8.12) Boyle
14-1-1A BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR,
FROM FAIRVIEW ROAD TO
PLANT NO. 1 BoNa Mladen Buntich $8,278,983 1-12.94
14.1.1A-1 BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR
SIPHON UNDER THE GREENVILLE.
BANNING CHANNEL B4Me (Included In Corps of Engineers/OC EMA Meinslem Project)
14.1-1A-2 BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR,
FROM RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1
TO GISLER AVE. (INCLUDES
CONT. 1-16) 1.7-92 Boyle 83,200,000 Steve P. Red.. 92,945,000.00 2.19.92 3.10-93 $3,048,238.00
14-1-iB BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR,
FROM BRISTOL STREET TO
FAIRVIEW ROAD 8-20-89 BovIe $7,475,000 Steve Subalo $5,345,530.00 7.12.89 10-1P90 $5,544,470.30
14-1-2 BAKER FORCE MAINS 10.23.90 Boyle $7,000,000 Mladen Sundial, $4,773,395.00 11-14-90 10-9-91 95,850,625.00
i
I
Dletriot 14.Page 1