Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-03-09 °�1T4ip" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS " OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA G.O.BOX 8127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 4'ee cou+'� (714)962-2411 March 2, 1994 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY. MARCH 9. 1994 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CaPifomia The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. ALI Assistan d r cretary Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 16th, at 5:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, March 23rd, at 5:30 p.m. SPECIAL JOINT WORKS - Wednesday, March 30th, at SELECTION COMMITTEE RE 5:30 p.m. COMPUTERS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1O ELL5 AVENUE 00.90%9127 FOUNTAIN V&U Ev,CAUMANIA 92>29-9127 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetinas March Mar 09, 1994 Mar 23, 1994 April Apr 13, 1994 Apr 27, 1994 May May 11, 1994 May 25, 1994 June Jun 08, 1994 Jun 22, 1994 July Jul 13, 1994 Jul 27, 1994 August Aug 10, 1994 None Scheduled September Sep 14, 1994 Sep 28, 1994 October Oct 12, 1994 Oct 26, 1994 November Nov 09, 1994 None Scheduled December Dec 14, 1994 None Scheduled January Jan 11, 1995 Jan 25, 1995 February Feb 08, 1995 Feb 22, 1995 March Mar 08, 1995 Mar 22, 1995 x. �- BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127• 108"Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728,8427 Telephone: (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA MARCH 9, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. (6) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel 03/09/94 (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - February 9, 1994 regular District 2 - February 9, 1994 regular j District 3 - February 9, 1994 regular District 5 - February 9, 1994 regular District 6 - February 9, 1994 regular District 7 - February 9, 1994 regular District 11 - February 9, 1994 regular District 13 - February 9, 1994 regular District 14 - February 9, 1994 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See pages "A" and "B" 02/09/94 02/23/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $538,036.05 $803,402.14 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 385,751.73 1,848,590.58 Joint Working Capital Fund - 151,387.48 152,171 .14 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,700.91 26,613.41 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 8,237.84 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 24,875.26 2,732.08 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 46,562.38 16,759.21 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 329,467.16 714.54 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 4,854.24 21,475.30 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 44,654.43 42,360.06 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 12,416.24 8,082.35 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 102.84 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 2,829.82 540.04 DISTRICT NOS. 1 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 320.10 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT 10,988.15 578,741.94 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 16.10 2,103.18 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 0.00 298.18 S1 .572.880.63 S3,504.904.25 -2- y 03/09/94 (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 91jf All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Purchase of One Self-Propelled Aerial Work Platform, Specification No. E-241 , to American Hi-Lift for a total amount not to exceed $74,785.00 plus sales tax. See page "C" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-32, approving Amendment No. 1 to the contract for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification No. P-140, assigning said contract from Peroxidation Systems, Inc. to Vulcan Peroxidation Systems Inc., with no change in the terms and provisions of the original contract dated October 1, 1993. See page "D" (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to PacTel Meridian Systems for Amendment No. 2 to the Telephone System Maintenance Agreement for the Districts' telephone PBX and related equipment (Specification No. 5-060), to extend said agreement for a six-month period from February 22, 1994 through August 21 , 1994, for an amount not to exceed $15,468.00 for existing equipment. -3- 03/09/94 V (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Swift Dodge in the amount of $43,876.00 plus sales tax for the Purchase of Four Intermediate Size Four-Door Sedans, Specification No. V-003, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Procurement Program of the State of California, and State of California Contract No. 1-94-23-10. (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2), authorizing a net addition of $36,228.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. for three items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "E" (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, authorizing a net deduction of $24,407.00 from the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for four items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 12 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "F" (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, authorizing a net deduction of $48,807.00 from the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for 16 items of added or deleted work. See page (h) Consideration of the following actions relative to the plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1 : (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 7 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of $1,032.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper Construction Co., Inc. for three items of additional work, granting a time extension of 503 calendar days for completion of said additional work, and assessment of liquidated damages at $2,000 per day for 26 days. See page "H" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-33, accepting said contract as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. See page "I" -4- v 03/09/94 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (i) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint, Roadway Construction Co., Inc. vs. Javaid Contractors, Inc. and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Harbor Judicial District Case No. 94CO873, relative to a stop notice filed by a subcontractor against Districts' contractor, and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICT 6 (1) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of plans and specifications relative to Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page "J" (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-36-6, approving said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, on an hourly- rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $57,585.00. See page "K" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -5- 03/09/94 01) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve staff Summary Financial Report for the six-month period ending December 31, 1993 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees' written reports of their meetings on February 16, 1994 and February 23, 1994, respectively (copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said Committees: (1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to negotiate a one- year extension of contract with KPMG Peat Marwick for annual audit services for the 1993-94 fiscal year. (2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to solicit proposals for a multi-year engagement beginning with 1994-95 for fiscal year auditing from the "Big Six" accounting firms and any other qualified accounting firm that has submitted a request to be included, for consideration by the Fiscal Policy Committee. -6- t' 03/09/94 (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-48; Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No, 21, Job No. P2-47-2, Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2: (a) Verbal report of Staff (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, changing the date for receipt of bids from January 11, 1994 to February 1, 1994. (c) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, making miscellaneous technical clarifications. (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 94-35, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work (re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2-47-2, Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers in the total amount of 41,003,899.00. See page 'M' (14) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. -7- i 03/09/94 (15) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (16) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (18) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- 03/09/94 (28) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (32) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn -9- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,CA 9272&8127 Telephone:(714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE March 9. 1994 AT 7:30 P.M. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a): AWARD PURCHASE OF ONE SELF-PROPELLED AERIAL WORK PLATFORM. SPECIFICATION NO. E-241. The self-propelled aerial work platform is used by the Operations and Maintenance, Technical Services and Engineering Departments. It has an operating height in excess of sixty feet, and is used to perform repairs, inspections, calibrations, and testing on facilities such as piping, HVAC, lighting, scrubbers, flares, emissions monitoring equipment, etc. This unit will be replacing Unit E-662 purchased in 1979 which is obsolete, making support for factory parts and dealer certification impossible. The replaced unit, E-662, will be sent to auction in an "as-is" condition. As part of our program to comply with SCAQMD regulations, the Districts are purchasing this vehicle with an engine capable of operating on both gasoline and propane, which will assist in meeting clean air goals. Four sealed bids were received on February 15, 1994. The bids ranged from a low bid of$74,785.00 to a high bid of$88,539.00, plus applicable sales tax. Staff recommends award be made to American Hi-Lift, the lowest responsible bidder, for the Purchase of One Self-Propelled Aerial Work Platform, Specification No. E-241, for the total price of$74,785.00, including delivery, plus applicable sales tax. March 9, 1994 i 9(b): ASSIGN CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE, SPECIFICATION NO. P-140. At the meeting of the Joint Boards on September 8, 1993, approval was given to award a contract to Peroxidation Systems, Inc. for a one-year contract for the purchase of hydrogen peroxide solution, beginning October 1, 1993. The Districts' were recently advised that Peroxidation Systems, Inc. was acquired by Vulcan Peroxidation Systems, Inc., a subsidiary of Vulcan Materials Company, of New Jersey. It is further recommended that the existing contract for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification No. P-140, with Peroxidation Systems, Inc. be assigned to Vulcan Peroxidation Systems, Inc., with no change in the terms or conditions of the original contract dated October 1, 1993. 9(c): APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 2 RE EXTENSION OF TELEPHONE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT (SPECIFICATION NO. S-060). The Districts own a complex and advanced telephone system which includes voice mail, automated attendant and digital communication features. The system is located in the Administration Building at Plant No. 1 but serves both Plants. For the past two years, the existing PBX equipment has been maintained by the supplier, PacTel Meridian Systems (PTMS). Staff is studying improvements to our existing PBX system which include the probable installation of an auxiliary PBX system at Plant No. 2. This new auxiliary PBX will be tied into the main PBX at Plant No. 1 and will not require its own attendant console. This new system will increase the reliability of the telephone lines at Plant No. 2, eliminate existing constraints on telephone equipment, increase the availability for expansion, improve the quality of the circuitry, and keep costs down. When staff is prepared to make a recommendation to the Joint Boards, a maintenance contract will be included in the proposal so that one single vendor will maintain both the new and existing equipment. In light of the plans for imminent expansion, Districts' staff is recommending a six-month extension of the existing maintenance contract to allow time to finalize planning and acquisition of the new equipment for Plant No. 2, which will be included in a new maintenance agreement. Staff therefore recommends that Amendment No. 2 to the Telephone System Maintenance Agreement with PTMS be approved to extend it for the period February 22, 1994 to August 21, 1994, for an amount not to exceed $15,468.00 for the -2- March 9, 1994 existing equipment. This rate, quoted by PTMS, is a six-month prorated price based on the rate of the Districts' present agreement with PTMS, which expired February 21, 1994. 9(d): AWARD PURCHASE OF FOUR INTERMEDIATE-SIZE FOUR-DOOR SEDANS, SPECIFICATION NO. V-003. Staff is requesting authorization to purchase four intermediate-size new sedans included in the capital equipment budget for fiscal year 1993-94, to be used as follows: SEDAN DIVISION DESCRIPTION 1 3350 To replace 1983 Ford Fairmont oath (Motor Pool) over 100,000 miles and to be assigned to the motor pool. Replaced vehicle to be sent to auction. 1 3380 To replace 1987 Chevrolet Celebrity (Operations) with mileage exceeding 100,000; assigned to the Chief Operator at Plant 1. 1 3720 Additional vehicle (Planning and Design) 1 3790 Additional vehicle (Construction Management) The Districts propose to purchase the vehicles under the State of California Cooperative Procurement Program (Contract No. 1-94-23-10). The total cost of the four sedans is $43,876.00, plus sales tax. Sufficient funds are available in the 1993-94 budget for this purchase. Staff recommends authorization to issue a purchase order to Swift Dodge of Sacramento, the State contractor, in the amount of$43,876.00, plus sales tax, for the Purchase of Four Intermediate-Size Four-Door Sedans (Specification No. V-003). The cars are delivered f.o.b. Orange County. A separate purchase order will be issued to the State of California for one percent of the purchase price for procurement under the State's contract. -3- March 9, 1994 , 9(e): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO OPERATIONS CENTER EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-23-5-1 (REBID NO. 2) Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2), Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, designed by Brown & Caldwell Engineers, is being constructed by Javaid Contractors, Inc. The current project includes the addition of 8,500 square feet of basement and first-floor facilities, the remodeling of 1,800 square feet of the existing building, and a 4,500 square foot enclosed electric-cart parking/charging area. The work includes new locker facilities, offices, elevator and general upgrades to the existing building built in 1977 at a cost of$2.3 million. This change order consists of two items of additional work and one item of deleted work for a net addition of $36,228.00 to the contract and a 10 calendar-day time extension. Item No. 1, in the amount of$32,200.00 and a 10 calendar-day time extension, is for modification and additions to the specked automatic fire sprinkler system. This project was designed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code and current ordinances. After the design was complete (November 20, 1991), the City of Huntington Beach adopted a new Uniform Fire Code which required the addition of fire sprinklers in the existing building, which did not have sprinklers. This item includes the costs for increasing the size of sprinkler piping shown on the plans, and added sprinkler design and permitting costs for fire sprinklers in the existing (1977) building, as certain areas of the building addition did not have sprinklers. The entire building will be equipped with fire sprinklers when the work is complete. This item does not include the costs to repair(or remove and replace) existing ceiling tile and rails as necessary for the additional fire sprinkler piping; this work will be done on a time-and-material basis, which will be included in a future change order. Item No. 2 is a credit in the amount of$2,452.00 for the rerouting of the sanitary sewer drain line through the boiler and HVAC room of the Operations Center expansion and under the ramp area to the existing sump. The requirement to demolish and replace a portion of the concrete slab in the basement of the existing corridor and mechanical room was deleted because of this reroute. Item No. 3, in the amount of$6,480.00, is for the replacement of the reinforced concrete ramp at the west side of the existing Operations Center. Upon excavation for the new building expansion, an old drainage pipeline was found to be leaking. The excess flows hampered the new construction in the area. The concrete ramp was removed to repair the drainage pipe. All of the above described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase- -4- March 9, 1994 If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $36,934.00 with a 36 calendar-day time extension. This represents an increase of 1.62% over the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for a net addition of $36,228.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. There is a 10 calendar-day time extension associated with the change order. 9(f): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-42-2. Job No. P242-2 is a $14.5 million contract to expand the secondary treatment capacity at Plant No. 2 by lengthening the clarifiers and installing other improvements. This project will increase the secondary capacity from 75 million gallons per day (mgd) to 90 mgd. The plans and specifications were prepared by John Carollo Engineers, and the construction contract was awarded in April 1993 to Margate Construction Inc. This change order consists of three items of additional work and one item of deleted work for a net deduction of$24,407.00, and a 12-day time extension. Item 1, a credit of$66,069.00, deletes six thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) pumps from the contract. These pumps support the existing DAF thickeners and had been replaced by Districts' staff after design was complete. Item 2 adds 175 feet of 2-inch high pressure air piping at a cost of$3,727.00 in order to make a tie-in between existing and new utilities. The tie-in location was found to be farther away than what was shown on the contract drawings. Item 3, in the amount of$3,345.00, provides for extra shop-fabrication costs associated with changing the sluice gate frame material from mild steel to stainless steel as recommended by Districts' design staff during shop drawing review. The stainless steel will provide a longer life in the gate. Item 4, in the amount of$34,610.00, is for the replacement of damaged portions of the plant water piping system within the existing clarifiers. When the clarifiers were drained, inspectors found that the main header sections of the existing plant water system's supports and piping were severely corroded and required replacement. The replacement at this time minimized disruption to the treatment process because piping will be replaced during the scheduled shutdowns required for the contract work. There is a 12-day time extension associated with this added work. Item 1 is a credit, Item 2 is a contract omission, Item 3 is a change requested by Districts' staff, and Item 4 involves as unforeseen condition to an existing utility. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on -5- March 9, 1994 this contract will be a net credit of$78,407,00. This represents an decrease of 0.54% from the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for a net deduction of $24,407.00 from the contract and a 12-day time extension to the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. 9(g): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PRIORITY PROJECTS ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P243-1. Job No. P243-1, Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, provides for construction of four chemical storage containment areas, addition of an anionic polymer storage and feed facility, installation of a new flow bypass gate at an existing effluent junction box, construction of a flowmeter test facility, replacement of demisting sections of existing air scrubbers, removal and replacement of asbestos-insulated steam piping, installation of new strainers at the plant water pump station, electrical modifications and other miscellaneous work items. The design for this $3.4 million project was prepared by John Carollo Engineers and the construction contract was awarded in April 1993 to Pascal and Ludwig Engineers. Change Order No. 1 is a net credit in the amount of$48,807.00 from the contract for fourteen items of additional work and two items of deleted work. Item 1, in the amount of$2,063.00, is for the abandonment of an undisclosed 42-inch vitrified clay pipe which was discovered and broken during installation of an excavation dewatering system at Effluent Junction Box No. 1. Item 2, in the amount of $3,215.00, is for the removal of an abandoned natural gas pipeline and temporary relocation of an existing digester-gas pipeline (not shown on the contract drawings) to avoid conflict with construction of a new effluent bypass structure and to keep the digester-gas pipeline in service. Item 3, in the amount of$2,025.00, is for the temporary relocation of a 10-inch chlorine solution pipeline at Effluent Junction Box No. 1. It was necessary to temporarily reroute the pipeline around an excavation to avoid conflict with the construction of an addition to the existing structure. Item 4, in the amount of $3,176.00, adds an electrical pull box required to complete the new electrical system for the weir gate being installed on an extension of Effluent Junction Box No. 1. The existing electrical pull box shown on the contract drawings did not to have enough capacity for additional contract-specified conduits. Item 5, in the amount of$924.00. is for the removal of an unforeseen abandoned concrete-encased electrical ductbank at the new chlorine absorption facility. It was necessary to remove and dispose of the existing ductbank to complete -6- March 9, 1994 foundation work for a new chemical containment area being constructed at the site. Item 6, in the amount of$297.00, is for the removal and abandonment of an existing 20-inch diameter undisclosed fiberglass air duct that was discovered during foundation excavation for a new chemical containment area being constructed around the existing ferric chloride facility. Item 7, in the amount of$2,932.00, is for the removal of a section of existing asphalt paving within the new solution polymer containment area and replacement with concrete. The paved area enclosed by the new solution polymer containment area was shown on the contract drawings to be existing concrete. When the limits of the new containment area were adjusted in the field, the containment area included a section of asphalt paving which had to be replaced with concrete. The chemical protective coating system placed on the interior of the containment areas is compatible only with concrete. Item 8, in the amount of$4,308.00, is for the extension of an existing overflow drain and other miscellaneous modifications (not shown on the contract drawings) within the existing ferric chloride facility, including the repair of existing concrete damaged by chemicals, removal of an abandoned electrical ductbank and concrete step, and additional caulking and sealing of the new chemical containment structure at the facility. Item 9, in the amount of$2,977.00, modifies the structural connection between the existing Effluent Junction Box No. 1 structure and a new structural addition, which includes a weir gate for better control of flows. The contract drawings did not require the two structures to be tied together; however, after consultation between Districts' staff and the design engineer, it was decided that for added seismic integrity, the combined structure could be strengthened by integrating them for a relatively low cost. Item 10, in the amount of$470.00, is for the removal of an undisclosed abandoned concrete obstruction encountered during an excavation at the Plant Water Pump Station. This obstruction interfered with construction of the support foundation designed for new plant water strainers being installed at this location. Item 11, in the amount of$1,670,00, involves piping modifications to allow for the future use of a test-meter probe at the new flow meter test facility located at the Ocean Outfall Booster Station, requested by the Districts' Instrumentation Department. Item 12. in the amount of$14,015.00. is for the furnishing and application of a chemical protective coating on the existing exposed concrete areas within the new solution polymer and ferric chloride containment areas being constructed under this contract. The contract specifications required coating of all new exposed concrete, but did not include coating of existing concrete surfaces within the containment areas. It was the intent of the project to apply a chemical protective coating to all concrete -7- March 9, 1994 surfaces within the containment areas. Staff found it to be more cost-effective to perform the total coating application of both existing and new concrete surfaces at this time. The preparation and mobilization costs were significantly decreased by performing all the coating work at this time, in lieu of performing this extra work under a future project. Item 13, in the amount of$756.00, is for modification of an existing basin catwalk support (not shown on the contract drawings) to accommodate the new emulsion polymer facility wall being constructed under this contract. Item 14, in the amount of$6,425.00, is for modifications to the contract- specified bleach tank. Tank construction required resin materials that are suitable for storage of bleach solution. Districts' staff subsequently determined that the use of a bleach solution may soon be replaced with hydrogen peroxide due to potential changes in Air Quality Management District's regulations to eliminate volatile organic compounds. Thus, the contractor was directed to modify the specified tank to allow the Districts to use multiple chemicals. This item of work was required due to a change in operating procedure by the Districts after this project was under construction. Item 15, a credit to the contract in the amount of$76,844.00, results from the deletion of the modification of twelve existing scrubber towers shown on the contract drawings. The scrubber towers were to be cut apart and sections added for installation of new demisting sections to provide better odor control. Upon field verification of the dimensions of the existing scrubbers, staff determined that the interior height was sufficient for installation of the new demisting sections without cutting apart and reworking the existing scrubber towers. Item 16, a credit to the contract in the amount of $17,216.00, resulted from modifying the procedures to remove an existing influent flowmeter(A& B), which is presently not in use and abandoned. Districts' and contractor's staff, working together in a "partnering" effort, determined there could be a substantial savings to the contract by abandoning the existing pipeline with the installation of brick and mortar plugs. This would allow the work to be performed inside the adjacent structures. The savings resulted from deleting the excavations, structural concrete caps and existing pipe section removals. -8- March 9, 1994 Miscellaneous rehabilitation projects within the plants, including Job No. P243-1, cover a large variety of different, unrelated construction items located in many different areas of the plants. Due to the complexity of these projects, field changes are often initiated based on actual conditions encountered that differ from those anticipated or known in the design phase. All of the above changes fall into this category. The original contract amount for this project was $3,398,000.00. This change order for a net credit in the amount of$48,807.00 results in a decrease of 1.44% from the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for a net deduction of $48,807.00 from the contract with Pascal and Ludwig Engineers. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9 (h): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 7 TO ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P242-1. AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE. Job No. P2.42-1, Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, is a $9.5 million project that includes the replacement of thirteen existing internal combustion engines and three existing electric motors, replacement of existing influent pumps, and construction of a power building for variable-frequency-drive equipment. This job was designed by John Carollo Engineers. Change Order No. 7 adds $1,032.00 and 503 calendar days to the contract for three items of added work and an assessment of 26 calendar days for liquidated damages. This contract is now complete. (1) Chance Order No. 7 Item 1, a negotiated settlement, covers charges associated with the delay between June 12, 1992 and December 8, 1993 for $20,440.00 and includes a 501 calendar-day time extension to the contract. The additional costs associated with this item are the reimbursement of monies due the Contractor because of the delay in the start-up of the Central Power Generation facility which impacted this project and delayed its completion. The Districts suspended work on this contract due to delays with the start-up of the Central Power Generation facilities project. The Districts could not allow the removal of existing engines, under this contract, which drive major pumping systems and maintain dual-fuel pumping capacity, until the Central Power Generation project was brought into service. -9- March 9, 1994 - Item 2, in the amount of$9,037.00, is for modifications requested by our Operations staff to the pump sequencing controllers associated with the Headworks' main sewage pumps. Also included is the development of additional video display screens for operator interface (control) of the plant-water pump system. Item 3, in the amount of$23,555.00 and a 2 calendar-day time extension, is for the removal of the old existing engine bases to prevent a safety hazard. Item 4 is an assessment of$52,000.00 against the contractor for liquidated damages due to several problems and delays associated with the final field testing of the variable-frequency drives. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders on this contract will be $111,231.00, with 525 days time extension. This represents an increase of 1.19% over the original contract amount. Errors and omissions account for approximately 0.75% of that total percentage. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 7 for a net addition of $1,032.00 and 503 calendar days to the contract with Ziebarth and Alper and C. S. Alper Construction Co., Inc. (2) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Ziebarth and Alper and C. S. Alper Construction Co., Inc. has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached with the agenda material, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement, and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $9,480,231.00. 9(i): AUTHORIZING GENERAL COUNSEL TO DEFEND DISTRICTS INTERESTS PERTAINING TO WEST COAST SAND AND GRAVEL VS. JAVAID CONTRACTORS, INC.. RE JOB NO. P2-23-5-1(REBID NO. 2). The Districts were recently served with a Summons and Complaint in the above-referenced lawsuit filed in the West Orange County Municipal Court. The action is by a subcontractor to enforce its rights pursuant to a stop notice, alleging that it had not been fully paid by the general contractor of the Districts on Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2. -10- March 9, 1994 The Districts have no fault or responsibility with regards to this action, but since they have been named as a party to the lawsuit, preparation of an answer or other responsive pleading to the complaint is necessary. After that, the Districts will simply await the final outcome of the dispute between the general contractor and the subcontractor, and based upon their agreed settlement or a court judgment, the Districts will then disburse the sums which they are holding. The Districts will be entitled to and in fact will deduct from the sums being held, the full amount of the legal fees and costs incurred by the Districts in handling this matter. The only actions for the Boards are to receive and file the Summons and Complaint and authorize the General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts, as necessary. DISTRICT 6 90): APPROVE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION RE ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK SEWERS AND CONSTRUCTION OF WATSON AVENUE SEWER AND CALIFORNIA STREET SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 6-13, The rerouting of the College Avenue Pump Station Force Main allows a general cleanup of old sewers in District No. 6 and the Costa Mesa Sanitary District. The northerly half of District No. 6 has been served by two sewers constructed for the old Army Airbase in the early 1940s, now the site of the Orange County Fairgrounds, as well as developed areas north and south of the Fairgrounds in the City of Costa Mesa. These lines are old and in very poor shape. Once the major flows are intercepted by the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, now under construction, these lines can be abandoned. The project includes constructing a small collector sewer in Watson Avenue, direct connections to a new sewer in California Street, and abandonment of the old sewers. In September 1993, the Selection Committee negotiated a professional services agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of the design, construction plans and specifications, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees and fixed profit in an amount not to exceed $57,585.00. In February, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved for this project, an action necessary to satisfy CEQA requirements prior to start of design. The Selection Committee is now, therefore, submitting the agreement for the Boards' consideration. _11_ March 9, 1994 The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work, and adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. ALL DISTRICTS 11: FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE SIX-MONTH PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1993. Enclosed are the budgetary financial statements for the second quarter of the fiscal year. The Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Budget statements were reviewed by the Fiscal Policy Committee on February 16. 1994. If any Director has questions pertaining to the statements, please call Gary Streed, Director of Finance, at (714) 962-2411, extension 2500. 12: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FISCAL POLICY/- EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on February 16, 1994, and the Executive Committee met on February 23, 1994. Enclosed for the Directors are written reports on their deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 13: APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM AND AWARD MISCELLANEOUS ARCHITECTURAL AND TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. Pl-48: MISCELLANEOUS WORK FROM JOB NO. P247-2 AND FLARE IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-56: AND SEISMIC RETROFIT OF STRUCTURES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-53-2. In December 1993, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P148; Miscellaneous Work from Job No. P2-47-2 and Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2. This project includes several jobs designed by both consultants and staff, combined to reduce administrative costs as well as attract lower combined bids through economies of scale. The first project, Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P148, combines miscellaneous projects designed by staff with items of work designed by Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers, Inc., under Job No. P140-2. Work items in Job No. P1-40-2 fall into two categories: 1) -12- March 9, 1994 items requiring extensive research and design (design scheduled for completion next year); and 2) items requiring little or no research (design complete). Handrail systems are one of the items for which design is complete. Staff decided to separate the handrail systems and install them at the earliest possible date for safety reasons. The other items from Job No. P140-2 for which design is complete are demolition of old gas-flare bases at Plant No. 1, and modifications to existing gates on Primary Clarifier Nos. 6 through 15 with portable operators. These items were also included in Job no. P1-48 for economies of scale. Miscellaneous projects designed by staff and included in Job No. P148 are as follows: Revisions to Building H to provide work areas for previously assigned staff and to construct an air-gun paint booth. Construct a wheelchair lift In Building 5 as part of an overall effort to allow handicapped access to all personnel-occupied buildings. Construct an access ladder and railing system for roof access to the Central Power Generation facility at Plant No. 1 for safely reasons. Replacement of hatches for the overflow boxes on Digesters 12, 14, 15, and 16 because the existing hatches are too heavy to lift safely. Construct soundproofing modifications to offices in the Administration and Control Center Buildings. Modifications to the Primary Polymer facility to switch the polymer feed system from reclaimed water to City water for better operation of this facility. Repaint the flares at Plant No. 1 for consistency of color. The original paint looks poor. The second job in this contract package is Job No. P2-56. This project includes work items designed by Lee and Ro from the previously approved Job No. P2-47-2, as follows: A hand-rail system for Plant No. 2 required for safely purposes. Demolition of old gas compressors and conversion of Compressor Building for electric cart parking. Installation of sludge piping in dewatering facility. Reroute hot water supply and return lines at Digesters F and G, and install piping and valving for isolation of either digester. Modification to the bulkhead storage rack at the Ocean Outfall Booster Pump Station pit. -13- March 9, 1994 Work incorporated into Job No. P2-56 by staff includes the repainting of flares at Plant No. 2 for consistency of color. The existing paint also looks poor. The third job included in this contract is Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2. This project, designed by Holmes and Narver, provides earthquake strengthening to the Plant Water Pump Station Building and Primary Power Building A (1) AddendumNo. 1 Addendum No. 1 postponed the date for the bid opening to February 1, 1994. (2) Addendum No. 2 Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications makes miscellaneous modifications and technical clarifications to the plans and specifications. (3) Award Contract On February 1, 1994, 4 bids were received for said contract. The bids ranged from a high of$1,774,430.00, to a low of$1.003,899.00. submitted by Pascal and Ludwig Engineers. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material. Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 1 and award of the contract to Pascal and Ludwig Engineers, for their low bid amount of$1,003.899.00. The engineer's estimate was $1,000,000 for Job No. P148, $200,000 for Job No. 132-56 and $150,000 for Job No. P2-53-2, for a total of$1,350,000. 14: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed sessi*Geral lar eting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. 'I 1� Sy ester Ma ger JWS:jt -14- RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 Cuum SarrallN DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA "a March 9, 1994 +oau ewsavEuue va eas e+z> FOUNIYM VGLLFV,fJLIfaPWG 92>2A4+2> mY sszx++ Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California Subject: Summary Financial Report for Six Months Ended December 31, 1993 Transmitted herewith is the Summary Financial Report for six months ended December 31, 1994. The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts through the first half of the 1993-94 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1993-94 budget for all Districts is $635.9 million, of which approximately 33% is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and additions, including reserves for said capital projects. The total budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several Districts are set forth below. TABLE I COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY (MILLIONS OF DOLLARS) IRmeasa 1993-94 REQUIREMENTS 1992-934 1993-940 Dacassa %of Budaat JOINT TREATMENT WORKS 0, M& R S 48.6 B 49.6 8 1.0 7.8% COLLECTION SYSTEM &OTHER DISTRICT 0, M&R 11.3 12.6 1.3 2.0% TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 80.6 70.0 (10.6) 11.0% DISTRICT SEWER CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 29.4 27.4 12.0) 4.3% DEBT ISSUE& SERVICE 10.0. &C.O.P.) 39.0 41.4 2.4 6_5% SUB-TOTAL $2069 $201.0 8 (7.91 316 CONSTRUCTION RESERVES $110.1 $110.0 S 1.1) 17.3% OTHER RESERVES 219.2 324.9 106.7 fill% SUB-TOTAL $329.3 4434.9 $106.6 68.4% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS $638.2 $636.9 S 907.7 11®.0% FUNDING CARRY-OVER $ 96.4 S 73.3 4122.1) 11.6% APPROPRIATED RESERVES 208.8 347.0 138.2 64_6% SUB-TOTAL 304.2 $420.3 4116.1 66_1% TAX ALLOCATION $ 34.2 S 31.9 S (2.3) 5.0% FEES" 77.5 89.6 12.1 14.1% BORROWING 98.6 60.0 (38.6) 9.4% INTEREST &OTHER 23.8 34.1 10.3 6.4% SUB-TOTAL $234.0 $215.6 $ 08.4) 33. b9° TOTAL FUNDING 5638.2 $63c.9 $ 907.7 'ADJUSTED FOR INTER-DISTRICT TRANSACTIONS. "1992-93 USER FEES WERE INCREASED $9.6 MILLION TO RECOVER PROPERTY TAXES CONFISCATED BY THE STATE SUBSEQUENT TO BUDGET ADOPTION. THE BUDGETS WERE NOT REVISED. �m Summary Financial Report Page 2 March 9, 1994 I Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion. Authorized general reserves and inter- fund transfers have been excluded from the budget column on said statements as expenditures are not charged directly against such appropriations. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district cash transactions for fiscal 1993-94 which were accrued in 1992-93 are not reflected in the year-to-date balances. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Earned interest generated by our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) is $13.8 million through the first half of the year. As of December 31,1993, 86% of our funds were invested with the County Treasurer's commingled investment program. The remaining 14% of funds, representing the debt service reserves for the 1990-92 Series B and C COP issues and the unspent proceeds of the 1990-92 Series C issues, is in a separate special bond fund at the County Treasurer's or a guaranteed investment contract, both controlled by the trustees for each issue. JOINT OPERATING FUND This fund accounts for operations, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. The JO expenditures along with the self-funded insurance program costs are monitored by the Fiscal Policy Committee and if some unexpected expenditures are experienced, they are reviewed by the Committee. Salaries and Wages - There are several authorized but unfilled positions and, thus, some minor payroll savings have been realized to date. Emolovees' Benefits - Includes Retirement, Workers' Compensation, Unemployment Insurance, Group Medical Insurance and Uniforms. Charnebacks to Districts and CORF - Payroll expenses are charged back to CORF through the cost accounting system for work on the treatment plants' capital expansion program, and to individual Districts for work on Districts' collection facilities capital - expansion projects as well as maintenance and repair of said systems. Source Control Division charges to respective Districts are also included in these chargebacks. Gasoline. Oil & Fuel - Includes all fuel for motor pool. A large portion is recovered through our equipment billing system and included in revenue below. Summary Financial Report Page 3 March 9, 1994 Insurance - Budget amount includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee fidelity, boiler, fire, earthquake and all risk insurance policies. Expense is in line with annual budget. Memberships - Includes the cost of membership in CASA, AMSA, SARFPA, WateReuse and other organizations. Annual membership costs are recorded when paid. Office Expense - This account includes various types of office supplies, postage, stationery, computer supplies and related items. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals - Primarily for influent and sludge odor control at treatment plant sites. The main chemicals used to control odors are chlorine and ferrous chloride. Ferric chloride is used as a supplemental odor control chemical, and caustic soda is also used in air scrubbers throughout the plants to reduce hydrogen sulfide emissions. Recent bids for chemicals will increase costs for the next nine months. Chemical Coagulants - Expenditures for this item are required to dewater our sludges prior to disposal to comply with Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as solvents, cleaners, janitorial, tools, lab chemicals, etc., purchased throughout the year. Contractual Services - The major elements in this line item are payment for grit removal and disposal at the BKK landfill and payment for removal and off-site beneficial reuse of biosolids or sludge. Professional Services - Primarily consists of General Counsel's fees, other legal services, audit fees, and miscellaneous consulting services. Printing and Publications - Includes all reproduction activities in-house and with outside services. Equipment Rental Outside Equipment Rental - Primarily for the rental of large cranes and equipment necessary for removing and replacing major pumps, engines and other large equipment during the course of maintenance and repair operations. CSDOC Equipment Rental - Reflects the charges for District-owned equipment used for overhead type activities. There is an offsetting credit applied through the cost allocation system for these charges. Summary Financial Report Page 4 March 9, 1994 Repairs and Maintenance - This item includes parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs continue to have a significant impact on this item. Generally, this account runs close to budget each year due to the unpredictability of major equipment failures. Research and Monitoring - Budget includes funds for the ocean monitoring contract required by our NPDES permit. Other projects include operational research and evaluation of processes to develop optimum operating parameters, and also include the Districts' annual share of participation in the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Travel, Meetings & Training - Major items are authorized by specific Board actions. Expanding activities of regulatory agencies and the Clean Water Act reauthorization have required additional staff and Board travel. Utilities - The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased natural gas for the start up of central power generation. Utilities expenses are in line with the budget estimates and are down $1,486,557 from last year. Other Expenses - For items not chargeable elsewhere such as freight, safety supplies, grounds maintenance supplies, etc. Prior Year's Expense - This account is required by the Uniform Accounting System and represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year or payment of charges which could not be accrued at year end. Generally, all expenses to this account are recorded in the first quarter. Allocation to Districts and CORF - This is an account established in connection with the cost accounting system and represents materials, supplies and services, overhead chargebacks to the individual Districts and CORF. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts' jointly- owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 35% (excluding reserves) of each Districts' budget requirements for 1993-94. During the first six months, $16.9 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities improvement and expansion projects. The pro-rata share of joint works improvements and expansion costs is reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS - The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the nine Districts and include each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Summary Financial Report Page 5 March 9, 1994 Taxes: Tax revenue is allocated to two separate accounts: Tax Allocation - This account represents the anticipated allocation of the Districts' pro-rata share of the maximum 1 % basic property tax allowed under Proposition 13, subsequent to the 92-93 state tax shift. Receipts are in line with expectations. Tax Levy - This account represents tax funds necessary to make principal and interest payments on voter-approved outstanding general obligation bonds. In accordance with the Jarvis-Gann initiative, tax levies to satisfy these obligations are not restricted. Only District 11 has a 1993-94 tax levy for bond service. Federal and State Construction Grants - EPA and SWRCB have previously funded up to 87 Y2% of treatment plant construction for approved projects. All outstanding grant funds have been received and no new grants or SRF loans are budgeted. Fees - All Districts now have an adopted, uniform sewer connection fee schedule. This account also reflects industrial waste user charges levied by seven of the nine Districts pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the Revenue Program, and the user fees implemented in Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13. Annexation fee revenue is unpredictable and, thus, is not included in the budgets unless there is an existing agreement providing for payment of fees. Sale of Capacity Rights - This account records income from sale of capacity rights to outside agencies such as SAWPA, including the capital replacement charge. SAWPA is billed in the fourth quarter each year. Other - Includes the annual joint facilities interdistrict equity adjustment required by the recalculation of the respective ownership percentages. Cost of this adjustment for purchasing Districts is included in each District's Share of Joint Works Construction. Share of Joint Works Construction - Represents each District's share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF), and the purchase of joint facilities interdistrict equity when appropriate. Bond Retirement and Interest Expense - Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds and certificates of participation of the respective Districts. Annual budgeted expense for all Districts is approximately $38 million. Share of Joint Operating - Represents each District's share of operating and maintaining the jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint Operating Fund statement for details). Summary Financial Report Page 6 March 9, 1994 District Operating and Other Exoenditures - Consists primarily of individual Districts' general operating expenses, industrial monitoring, operations, maintenance and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. DD:GGS:lc c:wro M%OrW.xm3.e.e4 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING/WORRING CAPITAL FUND BUDGET REVIEW 6 MONTHS ENDED 1WI193 APPROVED BUDGET YEAR-TO-DATE UNEXPENDED YEAR-TO-DATE 1993-94 EXPENDITURES BUDGET %EXPENDED SALARIES.WAGES&BENEFITS Selados&Wagon 30.053,000 14.524.696 15,528,104 48.33% Payroll Baronts 6.317.000 2,T78,763 3,538,237 43.99% TOTAL PAYROLL 38,370,000 17.303,659 19.D88,341 47.55% Lose: Chargeoud to Dlsd&CORF (10.200,00D) (4.881,708) (5,3DB,294) 47.96% NET JOINT OPERATING PAYROLL 26.170,000 12.411.953 13,758.047 47.43% MATERIALS SUPPLIES&SERVICES Gasoline,Oil& Dlosol 220,000 91.070 128,930 41.40% Insurance 1,165,0D0 537.138 627.862 46AI% Mombemhlps 58,000 28,945 29.055 49.91% OHlce Expense 396.000 183,949 211.051 45,57% Chlorine&Odor Control 2,376,000 1.085.082 1,310.918 44.83% Chemical Coagulants 1,1,78,000 471,936 1.306.004 25,54% Other Operating Supplies 1,105.000 476.866 828.134 43.16% Coniroctual Services 5.702.000 3,390.016 3,305.9114 50.67% Professional Servlces 904.000 319.632 584,468 35.35% Printing&Publication 345.000 160,921 184.076 46.64% Equipment Rental 235,000 108,016 126.984 45.95% Repair&Maintenance 3.870.000 1,731.688 2,138.312 44.76% Research&Monitoring 3.431.000 1,380,159 2,OW,641 40.23% Travel,Meeting&Training 22&OW 87.351 137.849 38.82% Uncolloctlble Accounts 10.000 (1,831) 11,831 A8.31% Utilities 3.650.OW 1.783,918 1,866.082 48.87% Other Expanse 930,0W 384.083 545.937 41.30% Prior Years,Expense 50.0130 (70,280) 129,2B0 -158.58% Non Operating Expense 60.000 31,755 28.242 52.23% TOTAL MATERIALS&SERWCES 27,508.01)(1, 12.157,297 15,351.703 44.19% Leta: Allocation to Died&CORF (000,000) (220.961) (379.039) 36.83% NET JOINT OPER MATERIALS&SERVICE 25,909,000 11.036.336 14,972,684 14.36% TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 53.079.000 24,348,W9 28,730.711 45.87% REVENUES Revenues (3,510.000) (1,706,589) (1743.431) 50.33% Love: Allocation to Cleo&CORF 10,000 8,527 1,473 85.27% NET JOINT OPERATING REVENUES (3,5W,000) (1,758,042) (1,741,958) 50.23% NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 49,579.000 22.590,247 26,988.753 45.56% GALLONAGE DATA M.G.FLOW CHARGES DISTRICT BUDGET TO DATE BUDGET TO DATE 1 8.584 4,X0 4.003,000 2.367.048 2 28.450 14,007 15,490.01H) 7.709,080 3 28.730 11,657 15.643,000 6.416.0e4 5 2,924 1.561 1.592,000 852.062 6 4.632 1.586 2,522.000 1.038,140 7 6,783 3.794 3.693.000 2.088.005 11 5753 2,689 3,133.0110 1.468.933 13 798 417 434,O00 220,781 14 2.788 751 1,518,000 413,354 89,422 41,042 48,688,1101) 22,590,247 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-1 SUMMARY OF JOINT WOWS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS page 1 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1993.94 6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/93 Prepared By: Big Aldridge (11 (21 (3) (4) (51 - 161 WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY . TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET 1993.94 199394 @ 8130193 TO 12MI/93 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 .3 A.New and Rabudgeted Major projects: 1.Westchester Oisp&Sample Stn P1-27-11213 6/942-A.B 305.000 200.000 2 2 200.000 Transfer to Projects Below (171L5911 (176.591) Chemical and Weatehaular Facility Modif is,PI.48 62239-A 1,400.000 142,519 6,817 142.519 149.336 0 Interim Wasteheuler Dumpl,Fac,P1.46.1 52239-C 217.000 34,072 34,072 34.072 0 2.Secondary Trmt Expansion to 80 MGD.P1-36 63717-0 36.222.000 750,000 3,329.262 205,697 3.534.959 544,303 Transfer to projects Below 135,0361 (11.473) 0 111,4731 Elxtri6catbn of Pump Dm ee,Pt-36.1 53717-A 6,318 6.318 16.3181 Secondary Treatment Expansion.P1.36.2 53717.9 2.928 2.920 12,9281 Bltlg 5 Modifn for Reloc of Source Control Inspectors to Make Way for P136 621660 35.035 11,473 14,675 12,783 27,458 0,3101 3.primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion,Pt-37 53719.0 31.425,000 600.000 115,210 1,443 116.653 498.557 4.Sacrosy&Landxapi,,P1.38.1 52108-F 1.630.000 1,OOO.00D 200.655 64,036 264,69t 936.964 S. Misc,Mods.Priority Elements P1-38-2 52108-G 6.370.ODD 3.500.000 750,059 620,858 1.270.917 2,979,142 S. Misc.Modifications Pt-36-4 62108-H 4,100.000 2.000.ODO 341.141 22,230 363,371 1,977.770 Transfer to Project Below 168410001 0 12KV Disminnion System for Support Facilities,Pt-47 52256.0 684,000 0 0 O 7. Rre prosso ion.Sign.,.and Water Diet.Made.,Pi-38-5 52106-J 2,475.000 150.000 174,346 68,416 242.761 811585 S.Elect Facility Modgns 6 Safety Upgredes.Pl 40-1 62187-A 2,902,500 200,000 16.803 10,926 27,726 189.075 9.Fac Modina&Safety Upgrades,PI 40.2 52167-8 4,604000 600,000 33,670 100,083 139.753 393,917 Transfer to project Below 134.2221 134.222) Mlac Amhiectwal&Treatment Pit Impmyements.PI-4 52268.0 1,626,500 34.222 34,222 34.222 0 10.Pnm Clarifiers 3.4&5 Rehab. P1-41 52199-A 2,021,500 76,000 20,968 61686 27.064 68.314 11.M1ac fmproyerrents,PI-42,PP48 52219-0 2,205.000 140,000 14,353 78,093 92.446 61.907 12.Seimlc Retrofit of Non,Structure Systems,P1-43 52229-A 4,260,000 1.6001000 50,856 57,289 IOSA45 1,442,711 13.Seismic RmrofN StructU4 Pt�44 52125.8 24,000.000 700.000 304,410 359,403 663,813 340.597 14.40 MGD Oeygen Actiyeted Sludge&DAF's 70.000,000 0 0 1 S.Bell presses(4 Unita) 151600.000 0 0 16.Solids Stomla f4 Gine1 I I1000,000 0 0 17.Digesters: 2 0 110' Diameter 91100.000 0 0 18. 12ky Electrical Power Distribution 2,300.000 0 0 1 S. Emergency Sewage Bypass System 4,000,000 0 0 20,Remgys Trickling Filte s 1 &3 11000.000 0 0 21.Central Air Compressor Station 2501000 0 0 22.Mix.Projects (See Schedule C) 13,250.000 2.000.000 7.157 97.374 0 104.631 1.902.626 23.Other Mercer Plan projects 0 0 a.HaedWorks No. l Rebuild.2003 14,960,000 0 0 b.Headworks N0.2 lmpellerftmp Speed,2015 2,600,000 0 0 c.Remove Trickling Filters 2&4.2007 1.300.00O 0 0 E.40 Mgtl Devi ACYd Sludge&DAF,2017 34,000,000 0 0 e. 110'it Deletions, 2003&2012 18,200.000 0 0 1.4 Batt presses. 2004 10,920,000 0 0 g. 12 KV Power Distribution.2001-2012 I,IO(LOOO 0 0. h.Standby Power Generation.2005&2016 5.000,000 0 0 i. 72 Mgd Pnmary Treatment.2004&2012 32,500,000 0 0 SUB-TOTAL -RECLAMATION PLANT 1 372.624,500 13.215,000 6,380,384 1.831,374 0 ],211,758 11,383.626 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE S-1 SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 2 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 6 MONTHS ENDED 12MI/93 III RI 131 (4) 15) 161 WORK REVISED TOTAL REGUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET 1993-94 1993.94 @ 6(UO/93 TO 12M1193 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 -3 B. Plant 2 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects: 1.Support Facilities and Site Improvements a.Operations Building,P2.23-6-1 53716-0,A 2.510,000 11600.001) 549.799 932,480 1,482,279 567,620 b.Warehouse Building.P2.35.2 51813-H 2,625,000 1.400,004) 181.729 39,029 220,758 1,360,971 c. Maintenance Building.P2-35-3 5181BF 2.725.000 11800,000 163.133 21.226 184,359 1,778,774 d.Construction Management Office.P2-35.4 51813-G 601000 50,000 146.874 36,608 182.480 13,394 e. Phase II Site&Security Imp.,P2-36-5 51813-E 2.100,000 850,000 97,383 10,429 107.812 83%571 2.Rehab Digester I,J.K,P2.394 52046-0 7,925,000 loo,00D 415.911 1,707 417.618 98,293 3.Rehab Oigeater L.M.P2-39-2 3.600,000 100.000 0 1001000 4.Rehab Digester N,0.P2-39-3 4,800,000 100.000 0 100,000 S.Primary Treatment 24 MGD Expansion.P2.41 53714-0 15.204.500 4,601 98 4.597 1961 6.Electrification Project,P2-42-1 53718-A 101150.000 150.000 9,463,057 579,566 10,062.623 1429.5661 T.Secondary Treatment Expansion,P2.42.2 53718-0.8 17.100,000 8.000.000 2,168,619 4,286,847 6.455,466 3,713.153 S.Priority Misc. Mod. .P2-43 1 62108-5 6,760.000 3.000.000 962,633 1.513,189 2.465.721 1.488.812 S.Misc.Modifications,P2-43-3,P2-55 52108-E.52239 8 7.555,000 2.600.000 73.557 149.448 223,005 2.350.552 10. Manitor/Contrcl System,P2.041See J-23-21 52094-0 3.225,000 275.000 1,898.146 89,095 1,967.240 205,906 11.Fee Protection,Signs&Water Diet.Modiins,P2.46 62176-0 4.664,000 160.D00 62.270 97.221 159.491 52.779 12.Eisen Fec Machin&Safety Upgrades,P2-47-1 52189-A 3.452.500 2000OD 8.698 5,722 14.420 194.278 13.Fec Modilna&Safety Upgrade..P2 47 2 52189-B 4.006,000 600,000 19,001 1O7,513 126,574 392.487 14. Primary Clarifier Rehab. P2.48 52199.8 5,247.000 400,000 63,912 7,162 71.079 392,833 1 S. Misc Improvements at Rant 2.P2-49 52220.0 303,000 200,000 15.538 37,484 53.022 162,516 IS.Barrels Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems.P2-50 52229.8 4.760.000 2,000,000 113,068 17,888 130,956 1,982.112 17. Seismic Ronalit Structural P2.53 62108-C 36,000.000 5,000,000 738,803 399,224 1,138,027 4.600,776 Transfer to Project Below I7,188) I7.1881 Miss"ends Madifns&Rare Improvements,P2.56 52269.0 239,000 7,188 7,188 7,188 0 10.Solid.Storage: 2 Bins _ 5.200.000 0 0 19.Additional 105 Foot Digester 4LOW.000 0 0 20.Rent Water Pump Station 1,200,000 0 0 21.Misc.Projects IS.Schedule DI 13.180.000 2,00(%000 68,505 145,193 0 203,698 1,854,807 22.Other Master Ran Projects 0 0 a.Replace Primary Basins A.B.C, 2006 11.700.000 0 0 b.Standby Power Generation,2005&2015 10.0001000 0 0 c.Monitoring and Control System,2006 520,000 0 D SUBTOTAL -TREATMENT PLANT 2 188.981,000 30.276,000 17.214.096 8,464.317 0 25,678.413 21,010,683 C.Ofisite Water Reclamation Rents 1. Site Accuifitian SAO0,000 5.000 000 0 5,D00,000 Transfer to Project Below 16081 (608) Reclmation Rant No. 1 Water Quality Management Stud 58231.0 280,000 BOB BOB 608 0 2. Reclamation Rent 3 52133-A 40,600,000 50.000 606.090 24.667 530,757 25.333 SUB-TOTAL- RECLAMATION PLANTS 45,990,000 5,050.000 506.090 25.275 0 531,365 5.024,725 D. Interplant and Joint Facilities 0 1. Imerplem Facilima.1.9 63713.0 24,000,De" 500,D00 20.999,092 1.096,644 22,095.736 1596.6441 Transfer to Project Below 1236,900) 114,0TT1 (14,077) Industrial Water Pipeline Extension at Plant 2 53713-A 235,900 14,077 24,T28 226,232 250,960 (212,155) CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE 6-1 SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1998-94 6 MONTHS ENDED I WIM3 Ill (2) 131 141 1W 161 WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET 1993-94 1893-94 @ W30193 TO 12131193 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 .3 2.Support Facilities and Site Improvements e.Admin.Annex at OM Lab Ste.J.30 6 J 11-1 62063-0,A 4,150,000 200,000 981986 15.262 114.247 184,738 b.OperatiaufCgnlrol Center.J-23-1 53712-A 5,000.000 100.000 120,933 20,167 147,100 79,833 c.Computer Equipment.J-2Y2 1See P2-sal 53712.8 2.525,000 25,000 2.073.464 87.479 2,160.933 (62,479) d.Personnel Sterling at Ph 1.J-26 63716-0 219601000 1,400.000 107,401 23.126 130.527 1,376,874 a.Damo6don of Old Control Center 450.000 350,000 0 350.000 I.Demolition of Support Bldg.@P2,J-27 62084.0 1.300,000 500.000 89.952 0 89,952 500.000 g.Central Lob ImprovemergsrUpgra Res J-17-1,2,3 52257.0 742.000 742,000 13.640 13,640 728.360 3.Central Genera ion Facility 0 0 0 a.Equipment Prepurohue,J-19A 53707-C 22,730,000 360000 20,468.832 (7,407) (20.200.9011 258,524 387,407 b.Emission Purchase.J-19B 53707-A.8 3.100,001) 0 3.060.080 0 12,104.5801 945,500 0 c.Plant 1 Facility,J-19-1 53707-A 20.800,000 300.000 20,419.110 684.194 21,103,304 (384,194) d.Rem 2 Facility,J-1 S-2 53707-B 29,060,000 am." 27,624.455 334,774 127,961.0861 (21.857) 465,226 e. Engine Evalugetbn and Restoration 3.500,000 21000.000 0 2.000.000 Transfer to Projem Before 1192.165) 1192.1661 J-19.2 Engine Demaga Rehab @ part 2 53707-E 176,747 1,554.356 616,250 2,170,605 (439.503) J-19-1 Egine Do".Beheb @ Plant I 63707-F 15,418 364,941 23.880 378.621 (8,2621 4.Waste Gas Flares,J-21,J-21A 52040A 30.00D 61000 125.706 108,532 234.238 1103.5321 5.Oudel&Booster PUMP Stan.. a.Rep.OWfa5 No. l Land Semion,}22d 63711-A 1.64QW0 40,000 1,601,490 36,863 1.637.153 - 4,337 b.Egtdpmem PreMmhem J-IS-A 53703-A 4,500.000 300,000 23.463 150.758) 127.3051 350.758 c.Tamp 02 Station for Oudtll W. 1 2.600,00D 0 0 0 d.Se cral MschvBe Header DOSS'C' 4,425,000 25,000 0 25.000 e. Replace 78'w1l 20'OW1811 to Deep Water 61.250,000 50,000 0 $0,000 6.ComWtedced Faolity RemMs and Dwg.System J-25.1 5821" 3,610.000 1,00D,000 0.320 10.8" 74.190 989,136 7.Seed.Power Systems Rehab.Studer J-25-2 58216�A 5001000 30D,000 1,843 1.643 298.357 S.TNephorrTNemetry MOmtoring Ex,J-28 52146.0 530.000 400,000 66.297 311.360 367,657 BB,640 9.Standby Power Reliability Mor line,J-33 52240�0 15.Oo0.000 1.000,000 2.186 303,965 306.151 696,035 10.Ocean Oudall Re5abf5ry Upgrades,J-34 S2241-0 14,000.000 2.000,000 2,147 307,235 309.382 1.692.765 11. Buahard Interplant Trunk Replacement 31.000.000 0 0 0 12. Sludge Disposal Projema - 0 0 0 A,Compost Demonstration Pent 9,000,000 0 0 0 b.Lend Acquisition 21,960,000 100.000 0 100.000 c. Landfill Devtlopment Phaeei 28,600.000 0 0 0 d.Compost Facility 50,360.000 0 0 0 13.Dlatrim Information Morugement Naterink 0 0 0 a.Main.6 Oper Mgmm Computer System 52149-A SO0.000 250,000 509,577 132,482 15.2991 830,760 117,518 b.Lab Information Mane9ement System Upgrades 52149.8 260.000 260,000 16,334 9,919 26.253 240,081 c.Porchaelng/AwoumingfFnamitl Information System 52149-C 1,501,000 750.000 1,412 50.671 52.083 699.329 d.Network System Integration 820,000 MIOOD 0 340,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-1 SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/93 (1) (2) (3) (41 (5) (6) WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET 1993-94 1993-94 @ SM0/93 TO 12/31/93 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 -3 14. Improved In-Plant Sampling Facilities 1151000 100.000 0 100,000 16.Effluent Sampler Systems J-32-1.2 52212-0 325,000 186,000 47,492 264,383 311,875 (79,383) 16.Other Master Ran projects 0 _ 0 0 a.Expend OOBS'C'to North 2019 2],125,000 0 0 G b.Sludge Diap.Landfill Phase II 2011 16,600,G00 0 0 0 c.Sludge Map.Equip Phase I&II 2001 11,500JJ00 0 0 0 17.Water Quality Diversion and Treatment Study ISARII 58221-0 1201000 20,000 0 0 0 0 20,000 10. Mhc Projects Moo Schedule El 11.710.000 1.5001000 200,79e 259,103 (11,702) 448,199 1,240,897 SUB-TOTAL -INTERPLANT&JOINT 429,258.000 15,892,000 99.640,536 4.879,103 150,303.6681 54,216.0]1 11.012.897 SUB-TOTAL - MAJOR PROJECTS 1.036.843.500 64,432.000 1 122.741,106 1 15,200.069 (50.303,568)1 87,637,607 49,231,931 E.Special "facts.Studies,Research&Development 1.Action Man: a. NPOES Permit(Application) 68209-F 375,000 50,000 340,307 13,986 354,293 36,014 b. NPDES Fermat(MONtaring Changes) 100.000 501000 0 501" 2.Solids Treatment.Disposal and Reuse 1,150,0GG 1 fi0,G00 0 150,000 Transfer to Reject Below (1,710) (1,710) Sludge Disposal Related Projects 58214-0 1,710 254,441 1,710 256.151 0 3.Air Quality Control Program 0 0 a.Air Taxies Inventary 1A32588 w/PEER 1.548.000 300.000 0 300,000 b.Touts and ROG Control:Biofilter R&D 58227-0 3801000 330,000 31,225 75,600 106,725 254.600 c.Air Emissions Source Control 50.000 60.000 0 60,000 d.SCAOMD Rule 431.1:Solfur Control 200,000 200,000 0 200,000 e.SCAQMO Rule I I79:Odor Control 670,000 420,000 0 420.000 I.SCAQMD Marketable Formte Program 501000 60,000 0 BOOM g.Toaice Risk Reduction Program 250,000 260,000 0 260J300 I A.O.Database Development 75.000 50.000 0 50,000 4.Water Consery&Reclamation R&D Projeata- 8501000 100.000 0 100.000 Transfer to project Below (38,170) (19,845) 0 (19.845) Row Monitoring for Water Carom Project Fe 1 Pen 3 58223.0 39,170 13.781 24,389 0 24,389 13.781 Uhravlolm light Pilot Rem 52133-C 6.064 7,448 7,448 (1,394) 5.Evlommental Research&Development 2,785.000 600.000 0 5001000 Transfer to projects Below (1.000,]39) (10518") 0 1105,864) Donal&ApPI of Molecular Tech to Direct Indicator&Pathogenic 0 0 Microorganisms in Treated W/W NWRI project WQ-9 68228-0 453,918 47,824 160.463 99.824 260,297 162,0001 Cdlaborauve Need Study Using Molecular Tech to Detect Hepetitus A Virus 0 0 &Virulence Factor Genes in E.COIi.NWRI proi HR-92-0 58229-0 496,821 8.040 (18,175) (39.176) (57,350) 47,215 Spatial&Temporal Wastewater Discharge Rums Study 582300 50,000 50,000 34,165 34,165 15,836 S.Master Plan Update 3.600,000 1001000 0 100,CG0 Transfer to Project Below (1,306) (1.306) Air Quality Management Implementation Ran 68232-0 375,000 1.306 1.308 1,306 0 SUB-TOTAL-SPECIAL PROJECTS 12,U83,000 2,600,000 ]92.860 194,764 01 987,414 2.405,236 F.Equipment Items 48,469,000 3.000,00I1 248.25] 1,551,766 11,214,6231 595.400 1,438.234 SUB-TOTAL-JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 1.097.395.600 70oO32,000 123,]82,013 160960.699 '161,618,1911 .9,220,421 53,076,401 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS COMPLETED AT 6/30/93 SCHEDULE F 6,389.222 (62,584) 1143ollOJI 6.183.520 62,584 TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 1,097,395,600 70432,000 130.151.335 16,894,015 (51.661.30911 95,383,941 1 53.13],ASK Comity Semisoft..Dfatri f No.1 4 Summary Quarterly Financial Report a Alumina Ended 1NJ1N3 Budget Steel. j 1993-Be Remaining Yem4o41ats Budget Ye014043ete Budget %Espended Beginning Fund Balances,July 1 36,191,470 . REVENUES: Tea Levy Bond Fund(.j Onlyj 0 0 0 0.0014 Test Allocationaguleverilon,(Store of l%) 2,030,000 1147.£11 1,182189 41.73% Federal and Slats C nedauctboo Grents 0 0 0 0.0011C Connection Fees 105A00 M316 130.6M 20.80% ()leer Fees 8,580.000 3,0114A83 S505507 46.81% Sete of Capacgy,Rights 138,000 0 ISl 000% Interest&Misc.Receipts 2,ON,000 1110,456 BBB.544 55.70% OMer 1125,000 0 1,125,000 0.00% Total Revenues, I;O54,00 a,O4p76 B.aN,624 4218% Total Rd ..up&Beginning Balances 4IX6,M E fEQYDITIJRES' Slue of Joint Works TML Plant Is Reserves 18.58A000 1,853.143 16.9n.257 8.90% District Trunk So.Constr.&Reserves 00.i'm N,W 35l 11.68% Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 9,814p00 1,42&O99 0.387,901 14.53% Share of Joint Worse Operating Esponses 4,74g000 2.N7.W 2381 49.85% Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% Dianna Operating&Me,Expenditures 651.00o MB 903 383,OBT 44M% Total Exporedduras M.1fa 0 6,TN,4N NA18,6N 116.31% Ending Fund Balances 3BA94AN Fadihles Expanslo. Balance Adjordemons TrMufarlp Unfit. MRS &Additions Rased Meade IMIM3 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 1-16 Softy.,Rd.Trunk ModlOcadom 563.631 45,730 709,361 2d Memory Lena lnmmepl.r l&2 3N2411 027 40 ,175 5u0.Total 1,062,979 46166T 0 111091636 Share of Joint Works 127M.105 1,653,743 (5.052.476) 0,328 M2 SubTotsl 12.7til 5 1,6113,743 (5,052,476) 9,320,062 COMPLETED PROPERTY.PLANT&EQUIP: land and PropBM Rights 81,39e 81 398 Coliectlon Undo and Pump SMa. S.M.133 S.TT9,133 Treatment Facilities 0 a Disposal Facilities 11.593 11,593 Ss, mal Plant and Admin.Fact. N.241 58,241 ERudy In Joint Treatment Fecll. 50,930,164 27,844 5,052.476 62.910,484 OMer Media m Coed Lees Amon 0 a Total Property Plant&Egulp. 78,6NR03 1,78,244 0 78,370,447 _ Coumy San/NUon Dmof fNo.2 Summery OudrtNy Flnncel Report B Monts Ended IWIMLI Budget Ra low 1993-W Bernard, YBvb Budget Ya..i Mlle Budget %Expanded Beginning Fund Balanced,July 1 210,711 REVENUES: Tn Lan(Bond Food(.)Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax AlloratlonNSubveMlond(Shea of l%) 6,560,000 4.268,285 5201,715 44.65% Federal and Stet corldbuNon Grants 0 0 0 0.00% Connactlon Fen 1.783,000 1,136A03 828,507 64.e01k Mer Fees 22BB6.000 11,549.7211 11,118.2T2 50.86% Sale M Capacity Right 388.001, 0 3W,000 0.0051, IntraM S ll Receipt 8,319,001) 4n7.568 4.01 WIM 1 0 0 a 000% Tatl Revenues 42.T08.000 21.182,176 21,623,BU MAIN% Total Revenue 5 Beginning Balances ID1,SaIm E)(PFNDT RES: Slmmof JoiM WOMB Trend.Plant S Reserves 55,11,67,000 e,920,102 51.03T,SW DisMM Trunk Sewer Comb.S Reserves 2,162.000 80.585 2101,e35 IBM Bond Refimment and Internal Expense 25,974.000 3.981,4911 21,BB9,502 15.30% S"M MJolm Worke Operating E Mrne 15.774,000 7.70.680 8,081.320 AB.BB% Provided ter Reimbursement Agreement 0 0 0 C.00% Diall Opened,SO Mar Expendit. 22A3,000 838.385 1.403.015 37.42% Toll Expendtturae 102.120,000 17,521,210 BeAW,TN 17.16% Ending Fund Beences 210,119,015 FaollBfes Expnelon Balance Ad)ustrimme Tranetrt laterite 711193 SAddMone Feed Aesnt 12131I93 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS' 2-14-5R2 SARI Manholo 0 706 TOM Foul Air Bypna @ SARI Maetr Motor am BABE 25-1 UncOln Interceptor all 20 B 2S 226 Sewer Enweament for AT S SF Commuter Roll 1W 114 w 25-2 Oren,S Oliva Subtrunk 2.W7 2WT 24ta Memory lane Me. 5 2 2.033,191 0,725 2A39,918 252 SawTe Trunk Um Diversion Gat 5 Monitortg Sys. 1 W I" 251 URI Relief Sower 82,764 771 83.635 243 Palm Ave.Perelman Agreement 31,517 16.928 0,418 2-9MI Cypraes Ave.SUWunk Serer Rolmb. 213,338 VAN 250.W2 Mac Chge to Closed WOM Omen 2,282 706 ISO 245EUUt Trunks etercaptr 570 AO Suo-Tobl 2ABB,WI "An 0 2A1T.1T2 Shereof Joint Works 3T.933,137 (Spi (1s.05l r2) v.802B8T Sub-Toll 3T.933.137 eA211.102 (15mim 2Tou" COM L 0 PROPERTY PLANT B EOUIPI Land and Property Rlgnte 517,BW 51].BW Collection Lines and Pump Ste. 91.611,WB 81,811,0W Treatment Faclllllse 0 0 Dlnpoeel F..IIM s 33.172 33.172 General Plant elm Admin.Fool. TW,W9 200,1149 Equity In Joint Treatment Facll. 186.038,288 (536,316) 15,059,172 180,9131,252 Otcr Aeeeb M CM,t Lees AmorL 0 0 Total Property Plant S Equip. 2H,081,1W AA63,]51 0 303,500414 County Seemed n Depend No.3 -. Summary OoU Ludy Financial Report 6AUMUUEMOMUlYJ193 Budget Rovlew 1993-84 Remaining Year4 uww Budget Year- Date Budget %apended Beginning Fund Baiancee,July 1 W3,1197,890 REVENUES: Taa Levy(Bond Fondle)Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax AOocathatelSubventione(Sham of 1%) to ng,000 4.863.767 EW5,233 ",at% Federal and Stale Construction Gmlrts 0 0 0 0.00% Conduction F. 1,068,000 730.162 327.836 69,01% Other Fees 23.515,000 10,473,895 13,041,104 44.54% Sale of Capacity Rights 461.00) 0 441.000 0.00% Intereet S Mhc Romipts 8,3661000 4,094095 4,271,905 48.94% Other 0 0 0 0,00% Total R9y0e.Us 44,209old, 30,+61,929 24,047,080 46.61% Tohl Revenue&Beginning Sahncne 224,059,808 E%PENORURES: Sham of Jobt,Works Tent Plaid S Resewas W '437,000 5.370439 w.NSJR2 8.89% District Trunk Sewer Coned.SReeerves 2,167,000 128043 2,046,957 5.54% Bond Retiramem and lnueeest Expense 24,288,000 3,3049111 20,981,039 73.61% Sham of Joint Worim Odelsting Expenses 15192e.000 6,415,044 9,512,958 40.28% Provided for Reimbutwment Agreemama 0 0 0 0.00% ONMI l Opened.,S OMer Upiunihres 5,359,000 973,786 4,384,214 18,17% Toil EapendiWme 108,+T),000 +8,+88,222 91,98+,T23 14.96% Ending Fund Balances 207,074,134 Facilities Expansion Baarme AdlueOmmda TrUnaferto Behowe 211193 aAddiOona Flaed Aeeei 1=1193 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 344-2 Lampoon lnhmephr Sevier 3y53 T.035 10.291 325 Onnge-Weehm Sub-Tmnk Relief Sewer 49,NO 49.000 Agency Owned Manhole 24 24 11-17$letsr Ppi Upgrade-3&11 125,13E 5,246 130,384 Seal Beach PIS YFO Upgrade 5 5 Tactical Pipe Replacement 160,658 6,161 16Q917 343BR Repl.Woatminster Ave.FOtce Mein 16,783 89.502 106,285 347 IS Widening Project 2013 7.529 7.735 3.38 MIIler4mlder Trunk Sower lmpmvemenh 0 4,578 4,ST8 Mleeellaneous Ch.,.to Closed W.O. 0 (B) (8) SubTotal 35$.966 inlial 0 476.011 Sham of Joint Would; 41.M.S52 5.370,438 (16,407.632) 30.292,358 Sub-Toil 41,]29,862 5,370,438 (16,407,632) 30,292,361 COMPLETED PROPERTY PLANT B EQUIP,, Land and PnpeM Rights 2E0,231 280,231 Collection Lines and Pump Sbm. 5;025,591 62,025,591 Treatment FaMIMn %M 9.922 Disposal FeellMee 28,410 26,419 General Plan and Admin.paid. 311.088 311.98E Equity In Joint Treatment F¢II, 179,814.281 (TSA88) 16,407,632 196,143A15 Othm Assets at Coal Lose Armlet, 7J12T (2A10) 4.217 Tohl Pmporty Plant S Equip. 284,162,959 SAI 9,/T3 0 269.57L132 Coumy Sarmatian Olson"No.5 r Summary Quarterly F4unclal Ropon 6 hfmm s Ended IWIM BudaMRevilw • flat-N Remaining Yaar o to Budget Year) ate Budget %Expanded Beginning Fund Balance,July 1 49,955,455 REVENUES: Tax levy(Bore Fund(.)Only) 0 0 a 0.001(, Tax Alleeati0nau Subvention,(Sham of 1%) 2.471,OOO 1.110,028 1.361 44.82% Federal and Stem Conelrucdon Gran6 0 0 0 Mcm Connection Fees 118.000 14,383 103.617 12.19% Cther Fees 2,831,000 1.452.570 1,178,4W 5521% S0le of Capacity RI9Me al.00O 0 61.000 0.00% hummed B eke Recoipla 1,5621000 985,161 M.M9 61.79% Other S,O93.00o 0 S.OB3,000 am Total Revenues 11,906A00 3,642,m2 8.393,858 Total Revenue S Beginning Balances 63,497,597 EXPENDITURES: Share of Jolts Woft Tram.Plant d Reserves 7,117,000 669,614 6447.386 04194 Disom Trunk Sewer Career.S Reserve 4,695,000 2,698.322 2,006,878 ST.26% Bond Retremem and Internet Expense 4,664,000 $33,803 3.830.197 17.88% Share M Joint Warke Operating Evaree 1,601.000 859052 761,948 SIMA Provided for Reimbursement Agreements fall 0 109.030 am% District Openting S Other Expenditures 804,000 374,259 429741 0.65% Tool Expenditures 19,0101000 5,425,050 13,184,950 28.54% Ending Fund Balances 48,072467 Fadaftme Expansion Sala.. Adjustments Transferto and. 71193 A,AddMons Fixed Amanda 1291193 CONSTRUCT ION IN PROGRESS': 583 Bay Bridge PIS lmpa 822M R4,567 1.147.373 Sliplino BaybMge Force Main E1 BR-2 1.022 t.on leer.McMtal S*Mh*@ Uft PIS 108 108 S 6 So.Covet Trunk Sewal4nnd Plumes 182 "S'a5T 1105,121 1,963,978 546 Cr tel Cove PIS 158,416 390,455 540.871 S34 Bayeid.Dr.Trunk Sewer Impr.Phi.1,253 5.099.99I 99,795 5,199,789 5 Co,0.1 Mar PIS BAD 8.4P Lido PIS a2 Me Upgrade 25.8M - 25,870 TechBe Pipe Replacement 2.414 2,414 Mlecallammus Charges to Closed W.O. 0 248 248 541 Coast Highway FDroO Sam RePlacemrd 5 8 6 AT75 183 5.938 S412 Bitter PI S Rocky N P9lmprov.5 S 6 250,540 113A81 364,021 547.1M Ropl.Plan 4015 S 6 Z710 2716 5474164 PCR Gravity Sun Rehab 5 S 6 188,655 574,492 763.157 S 9Siphon5S6 895.1m 695.190 Sub�Tohl 81040,8110 2,6BB,122 0 10,7291122 Shmeol J.Inl Works 5.180.180 009.614 (2,045,788) 3,TTTP00 S.b TOhI CIS&190 m9,614 (4045,788) 31T1T,006 COMPL D PROPERTY PLANT B EQUIP, Land ant Property Rights B,231 6,231 Collection Llne and Pump Sms. 22,802.921 22 602,921 TnaVnent Facilities 7.347 7,349 DlepoW Facilities 7.115 7.115 General Plant and Admin.Feel. 2T.347 27,147 Equity In Joint Treatment Facll. 22,018.508 422,345 2,045,788 24p04,641 Other Amele at Cost Lea AMOM 72,594 (13.736) M.858 Total Property Plant S Equip. 57,934,043 Sy68,545 0 61,7095118 County Sentence;Olaetot No.6 Summary DuamMy Financial Report 6 Months Ended 1WIM3 Budget Review 1993-e4 Remalnfag Yffiff Date Budget yoar40-Data Budget %Experded Beginning Fund Balances,July 1 31,801,795 REVENUES: Tea Lrvy(Bond Fund(.)Only) 0 0 0 0OW. Tea Allocationslsubventmns(Share of l%) 1,491.000 564.485 926,515 37.86% Federal end Stets Cameacllan Gramme 0 a 0 0.00% Connection Fees 235,000 19,092 215.938 8.11% Omer Fare 3,377,000 1,712,459 1.854.531 50.71% Sale of Capacity Rights 76,000 0 76.000 0.00% Internet&Miss.Receipts 1,315,000 599.472 715.520 45.59% C mr 1.150.000 0 1,150.00O 0,00% Total Revenues 7,644,000 2,895,488 4,748,512 37116% Total Revenue&Beginning Balances 34,697,263 ENPENORUFES: Share of Joint Works Tmd.Plant&Reserves 11.374.000 891.120 10,402.B72 7,83% District Tmnk Sewer Coney.&Reforms 1,026.000 196,999 1,428,001 12.1n.. Bond Rothmans and Intere0s Expense 3,040,000 370,932 2,669.006 1220% She.of Joint Wake Omallng Expornoa 2.568.000 1.030.140 1.529.880 40A3% Provlded for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% District Oparegng&Other Expenditures 321,000 86,292 235,708 28.5TY. Total Expenditures 18,928,000 2,582,491 IsAd6,509 13.64% Ending Fund Balances 32,114.792 Facilities Expansion Balance Adjustments Transfers, Be[... WIM3 &AddMans Fixed Awets 1LN193 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: le-1-1A&8 Gisler lnt,14-14 Baker Street 483.30 7,287 490.653 642 Felmelw Relief 240,267 248.267 "I Coast Highway Forte Mein Replacement 5&6 us 9 354 542 Bitter%&Rocky PS PIS Imprev.6&6 91.121 41,P3 132,304 64TAM Raps.Plan 401 5&6 679 679 5474&4 PCH Gravity San Rehab 5&6 42,35T 148.430 190.787 549 Siphon 6 IS 6 36,589 36.589 Sub-Total e0;Y24 196.509 0 1S99.T23 Sham of Joint Works 8,857,694 091,128 (VZ2.551) 5,026,471 Sub-Total 9S5T,894 891,128 (2,722,551) 5,026,471 CO 1 E/ED PROPERTY PLANT&EOUIP Lend and Property Rights 5B2 %2 Collection Linea and Pump Sets. 1,788,61M 1.700.866 Treatment Facilities 2,853 2,653 Disposal Faclift ee 7,3e4 7,394 General Plant and Admin.Facll. 93,421 23,421 Equity In Joint Treatment Focll. 28,883.984 155,411 2.722,551 31,761.946 Omer Assets at Coat Loss AMOM 37.117 (7,050) 30P67 Total Property Plant&Equip. 38554,615 1,236,488 0 39,791,102 County SenNtlen OYWch No.I ' summary OuertMy gnuNx Rapun d MonW Fndp I"IM ender Realew e t993-M Ruu1nA9 yaaay b Budd" Yurbdala Budpx YEgended Be9thnli5 Fund Balances.July t p,ry].Y19 REVENUES Tul (Gland Fundla)Only) 0 0 0 am TUAllecedOnsSUWanacns(Slunolt%I 3.355.000 1.a913BG 18YJ.)W M15% Federal and Slim ConsWNon Gn+nM 0 0 0 am Gommatbn Fax I1e.000 192.701 ({6.)01) 137,M ONx Fax 5252,000 2.859.591 3,128A09 45.95% Sale 01 C.'uh,.,h. 99.000 0 W.OW am I..,6N0.R..IM S.]M.OM 1191 1.890.557 50.1m ONar 95.O1XI 0 95,000 0.00% Total R.-..- 12,823,000 s,Nhi 9A]1,9)1 Tonal Revenue S Badlnnln9 Bslencas p.Tit.2M E.YP�NOINRES: Shen of Joint Web Tut Plan)S Anti 15,785.000 1d7]]9 14.557.08 7. Obtrlx Trvnk Sewer Cxub.S Resh. 3.992.000 1351XB 2.)15]44 91J1% Bend ReOnment erN had.Ea0enee 5,2IBM 174295 aA93.719 KIM Shenof Jelni Wob Opratlnpliana s 3.161A00 IAt.005 1,9T1M 852% PreHded for RxmEusemxR AgmemsnM 0 0 0 000% OwMt Operating A Mar Eapen0ldrs 1.299A00 MIN 1A99918 YM% TOYI EspndlWm M=hcoo 9AMA2] ]tN1A2T IUM Endlnp Fund Balancer U.719.m FarJWx EapsnaM Balance AaQ`pgm hu TnvMx BaNnn 7AM Sandhi FtrW Aexb IVII. CONS 2RlICROIJ M PROWESS: 2-22 PenIW 9 ROL Umun Nelphla N) 2.201 2851 72.1-1C ai Aim.Pump Sin R,l Fmu NFNg B51 fOAN 11,614 )Aa Ompe Perk Acm Sever Study 8.813 e9.550 93.353 T.2a.1,plo A.MWM 0 317 317 T-O Cowan hda hb sever 37.715 5.3M 0.131 McWwIMSMtronvantllatlOn OMmile o 2.10 9.10 7.7-1 Main Spit PS 12M 9339 19.633 Manhole Ad)usbnenin Re.Onppe CeulNy 0 208 209 I&I IS S B Gbkr lnt,14LI-2 Baker SMt FOme MCMObukb9,T51a 1.035,813 19A92 I.M.95 2A1.1.2.I AOanunmut ud Mad".W PS 1.74224 Sal 1.742.601 SwrMW Faxmentlndn B00ka 1329T 13= Tna ACeMen9lial 15] 295,9M a0.557 MASS 261-I Sun9owallM 18.70 219 18,992 2.19 Lmron Neylhas sewer 52.092 5),M2 Main Spit Flux Ladder 151 22a 335 7-1-1 GUMXRedMY Tiunk Adndevnem 2,232 22M Taub"RePlacemaM a9427 1.897 4'.120 Y]O Navy Way PS AhudOnmant 99=3 0I.791 1,091A10 7-17 Orange Park Acm Sswwr ROL M loS 10.911 7-1&2 Oelhl Chanxl Siphon n.933 (41.743) 32190 )n Bd Panic Arthur Trwk A )0214 111.41111 181.705 Nervam Ava.Tunk SWmr 1,MM2 I=tfiat Mlacellanaox Clough,to Clxad WA. 1,S59 2S I.M SutrTeMl SA21M7 1.291A89 0 9633.203 Shan 01 JeMt Wob o"'.341 1202314 O,8MA19) 8.810.15/ SUATxx 8291.H1 1207239 (]AtlA18) SA10A67 E EO EW Lend and Property Rlphaa Z)B a51 376.45a CObNon Wx aM Pump SW. 31295.)1) 31285.]1) TMM@nt FealWan 0 0 Olepoul F=Kl. 10,792 10]02 Wnenl FlntaM Admin.path. 78M1 79,M1 Equity In Jain Tmxmex Faun. 39515281 (49833) 3A99.819 U'.I54,099 Mar....el Cost Lees Amwt W02 02M) 21.308 TOMl pmpeM Plant S Equip. 85ASOAM ;2B9A13 0 M289,)ae i County Sen8e0on Disbad No.11 r Summary Quarterly Financial Report 6MonMSErmed129f93 Budget Review t 1993-94 Remebdat, Yaar4 dlx, Budget Yen-W ace Budget %Bemused Beginning Fund Balances,July 1 80g0&848 REVENUES, Tte Levy(Bond Forestal Only) 15,000 7,197 7,803 Tax AllotsOonsl3ubventlone(Blmm of l%) 2.133,000 939,612 1,19$368 44.05% Federal anti Seale ConsWctm.Grams 0 0 0 0.00% Connection Fees 353,000 76.550 n(i 21.99% Mar Fees 3,694,000 1O53,3116 2,040,834 «.TB% Sme of Capacity Rights 83.000 0 "000 0.00% Interest O Mlec.R.00pts 2,2n.000 g80,355 1,205,545 43.4904 Mar 0 0 0 0.0016 Total Revenue. 8,6551000 3.07,000 00719" CL88% Total Revenue&Beginning Balances 58,875,726 E)1PENA91IRES: Sham of Joint Worse Teat Plant 8 Reserve. 12,880,000 1,017,W8 11,942,052 7.85% District Trunk Sewn COVR.B Reserves 1,050,000 37.389 7.012,811 0.0% Bond Retirement and Interest Expanse 4.490.000 515096 3,W4,SW 11.42% Share 01 J0int Worts Operating Exteues 31190,000 1,461 1.721,067 46.05% Provided for Relmburmormit Agraem.mts 0 0 0 0O0% District Opera0e,5OMer Expendtiun. 935,000 26111184 574,816 n.83% Total ExpandlMme U16415,000 3,09,560 25.325ASO 11.0% Ending Fund Balances 56,576,178 Facilities Extension Betsnte Adjuatrneme Tmnelereo Balance Tilm BAGSMOns F4ad Assets 1213193 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 11-17 Slater PJS Sewage Sys lmprov. 747,285 28.951 n6236 X.B.Wetlands Conserver Wetiam Career 0 8,438 8A38 Sub-Tool W.288 37.389 0 TB4,674 Sham 0l JOlnt World, 7,833,875 1,017,948 (3,110,010) 5,741O13 Sub-Total 7,833,075 1,017,948 (3,110,010) 9,741,813 COMPLETED PROPERTY.PLANT 5 EQUIP: Lend and Property Rights 148,988 148086 Collection Linea and Pump Stan. 19,011,15E 19,011,158 Treetmem Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facllmes 3.053 3,053 General Plant and Admin.Face. 28.698 28,699 Equity In Joint Treatment Fecll. 33,214.009 (71,273) 3.110.010 36.262,746 Mar Assam at Cost Lou Arrant. 0 0 Total Property Plant B Equlp. 61,016,065 is"c4 0 61,988,129 COMOr SenhaVon DisWa No.13 Summery Ouenerry,Financial Report 6 Momhd,Ended 1WIM3 Budget Revlee, 1993-M Remaining YeerAo ate Budgat Year-1o43am Budget %Expandetl Beginning Fund Balances,July 1 17,050,560 REVENUES: Tax L vy 41 oad Fund(&)Only) 0 0 a 0.00% Tv Allnpatioasl8u0venUon&(Share of 1%) 0 0 0 0.00% Federal and SMe Conservation Gmens 0 0 0 0.001K, Connection Fee& 470,000 485,300 4,700 am% Other Fees 732,000 W.V4 36T,T28 49.78% Selo of Capacity Rights 9000 0 9,000 0.00% Interest 6 Mlec.Recelpts 890,000 404,1T2 265,828 58.50% Other 0 0 0 am Total Revenues 1,901,000 1,2d3,746 86y,251 64.90% Tend Revenue 6 Beginning Balances 12,092,308 EXPENDITURES: Sham of Jolts Works Treat.Plant 6 Reserves 3,462,000 13SZ78 2,320,724 5.49% OtsUict Trunk Seven Corona.&Reserved, O73,000 0 473,000 0.00% Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 28,000 4.097 23.903 14,63% Share of Joint Woks Operating Expenses 442,000 229)81 212.219 51.99% PrevidW for Relmhureemant Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% DIBMcI Opemdng&Met Expenditures 109.000 34.410 74,590 31.51"K Total Espenade. 3,514,000 403,564 3,110,4.36 11.48% Ending Fund Balances 18,606,742 FaclllEw Expansion Bills.. Adfumbrems Transform Belsnpe 7I1193 6Addltlmu Fixed Nasals 1ZIJ1193 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGBESS: Shamof Jalnt Works 1.041,040 135.278 (413.291) 763.031 Sub-Toml 1,W1Na8 135,276 (413,291) 763,031 COMPLRTED PROPERTY.P"AT 6 EDUIP: Lend and PmsmY Rights 0 0 Collection Lines and Pump Sees. 2,285,357 2.205,357 Treatment Faclll ive 0 0 Disposal Facilities 0 0 General Plant and Atlanta.Fecil. 0 0 Equtiy In Johd Tmannem Facil. 4,481,576 (143.558) 413,291 4.751.309 Other Ad,&oM at Cont Lod,Amon 0 0 Total Properly Place 6 Equip, 7,807.979 (8.282) 0 7,799,697 Cpumy SanlleVoo Dlanic(No.14 s Summery chain"Financial Roporr 6 Manville Ended fY]193 Budget Revlew 1993-ns Remaining Year4oOsts Budget Yaar4o43au Budget %Expanded Beginning Fund Bounces,July 1 63ASg512 REVENUES: The Lm,(Bond Fondle)Only) 0 0 0 0.00% The Alloce6ons/Sabamltlona(Share of l%) 0 0 0 Bop% Federal and Stale Comstumom Emma 0 0 0 0.00% IRWD Foxe 16.400,0001 5,072.524 11,327.476 30.03% Other Face 0 1047 (I.MT) 0.00101. Sale of Capacity Rights 811000 0 81000 0.00% In,eraet&Misc.Racelpts 383,000 109.930 273,070 2aIM Other 0 0 0 0.00% Totel Revenues 16,864,000 61183,601 11,680,469 30.04% Total Favemue 6 Beginning Balanced 68AS4,013 EXPENDITURES: Sham of Joint WOMB Tmlt Pun,&Reserves 12.764,000 1,oX.058 11749.142 &Ci District Trunk Sewer C natr.&Firearms 4.675.000 55.914 4.819,088 1.15% Bond Re0remam and Induced Exceeds 165,000 24,103 14O097 14,61% Shire of Join,Woft OpamOng Expanses 11546.000 413.56I 1132,M 2815% Provided for Reimbursement Agmsmen,d 0 0 0 0.00% District Operedng&Omer Expenditures 450,000 87,10 302015 14.23% Total Expendtmrae IDA20400 IJ195,624 18.224,376 BAM4 Ending Fund B tarced 66,818,3B9 Fastigiate Expansion Balance Adjua0nsrds Traedurto Balance 711M &AddMons Flied Assets 12A193 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: U"cfty Purchase from DUMcta E&6 4.015 6W 4.622 Main Street Flume Flowmmer 2.544 2.544 14-1-1 A Is B Gluier Int.,141.2 Baker St Forte Mein,DisWc46,7&14 2815.OB5 42,740 2.657.805 Main St Pump Station Improvements 7-T-1 0&TSt 12,557 01,298 Sub-Toal 289DA66 61,914 0 2746,269 Sham of Join,WOMB 7.964.008 1.054.858 (3,161,672) 5,837,192 Su4Tetsl TA81,098 1A54A6B (S,t81,8f2) 5,037.192 COMPLETED PROPERTY PLANT 4 EQUIP' I ndl and Pmpedy Rights 0 0 Collection Urea and Pump Sh16 16.631.400 10.531,488 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal FacllBus 0 0 General Plant and Admin.Fec11. 0.742 6.747 Equity In Joint Truman Fecll. M,W,132 (lW,]Atl 3.181,672 36.422.548 Other Assets at Cost Lees Airport- 0 0 Total Property Plant Equip. 60.NT,H3 M,611 0 611644,244 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 01 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 1° E.15.�N°E 00 80X 8127 FW WAiN MLEY,CALFORNIA 9272&81 27 February 23, 1994 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: February 23, 1994 - 5,30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Director George Brown Charles E. Puckett Vice Joint Chairman Director George L. Zlaket A. B. "Buck" Catlin Past Joint Chairman John Shaw, General Counsel's Office Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Daniel Spradlin, General Counsel's Office Fred Barrera Chairman, District 1 John Collins Chairman, District 2 STAFF PRESENT: Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 John C. Cox, Jr. Chairman, District 5 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Gary Streed, Director of Finance Barry Hammond Chairman, District 7 Blake P. Anderson, Director of Technical Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Services Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Roger Stanton County Supervisor Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel William Steiner County Supervisor Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations ABSENT: John M. Gullixson Chairman, District 13 1) Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on February 16 and considered several items of business. Enclosed is a report (green) of the Committee's meeting and recommended action items, summarized as follows: Report of the Executive Committee February 23, 1994 Independent Professional Audit Services. The Boards have engaged KPMG Peat Marwick to provide independent professional auditing services for the Districts. KPMG's three-year contract expired with the completion of the 1992-93 audit, which was approved by the Boards at the Mavember 10, 1993 meeting. Because of KPMG's major involvement in an upcoming separate independent auditing effort for the Districts, and the current development and conversion to a new financial management and information system which was approved by the Boards on February 9, 1994, the Fiscal Policy Committee recommended that the Boards authorize it to negotiate a one-year extension of KPMG Peat Marwick's agreement for annual audit services for the 1993-94 fiscal year. (The 1992-93 fee was $55,700.) The negotiated.agreement will be returned to the Directors for consideration at a future meeting. The Fiscal Policy Committee further recommends that for the 1994-95 fiscal year audit,the staff be directed to solicit proposals for a multi-year engagement beginning with 1994-95 from the "Big Six" accounting firms, and any other qualified accounting firm that has submitted a request to be included, for consideration by the Fiscal Policy Committee. Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee concurs with the recommendations of the Fiscal Policy Committee. Supervisor Stanton requested that his vote in opposition to the recommended action be made a matter of record. 2) Evaluation of Water Quality Element of SCAG's Reaional Comprehensive Plan. Staff reported that in December, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) issued a draft of its Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP). One of the 15 chapters deals with water quality which includes wastewater management. Using the enclosed (tan) outline, the staff reviewed its evaluation of SCAG's RCP Water Quality Chapter (also see enclosed salmon Staff Report). It 2 Report of the Executive Committee February 23, 1994 summarizes SCAG's RCP Water Quality Element and recommended language changes to the plan to minimize its impact on our ability to plan and construct needed wastewater facilities to serve increasing service demands and comply with more stringent regulatory requirements. During the discussion of the issue of regional water quality management, there was a great deal of concern expressed by members of the Executive Committee about SCAG taking on additional discretionary authority that is presently not vested in SCAG. Most of the members that expressed an opinion said that SCAG review and oversight regarding public policy affecting the Sanitation Districts land other wastewater treatment agencies) should be limited to the least involvement possible and only where federal participation is applicable. They expressed a significant degree of reservation about any review authority by SCAG over the Sanitation Districts' facilities planning and construction programs, believing that the interests of the members of the public within our service area can be best represented and served by our Boards of Directors. With the exception of the very narrow and specific mandates of the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act, there was little support for SCAG providing oversight or review of the Sanitation Districts' facilities planning and construction efforts. The Committee believes that SCAG's review and rewrite of the RCP Water Quality Chapter should be accomplished within this context. Executive Committee Action. The Executive Committee authorized the staff to submit proposed RCP Water Quality Chapter language changes to SCAG as set forth in the enclosed (salmon) February 16, 1994 (Revised) Staff Report on pages 12-15. 3) Closed Session Re Litigation and/or Personnel Matters. The Committee convened in closed session to consider matters pertaining to current meet-and-confer negotiations with Districts' employee groups and matters pertaining to potential litigation. JWS:eyr Enclosures Awpd..b...=2384... 3 I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS February 16,I 1994 AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA ' IOW ELLIS AVENUE PO BOXG127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 927MB127 014)962.2411 REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE Meetina Date: February 16, 1994 - 5:30 P.M. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: STAFF PRESENT: Charles E. Puckett, Acting Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Don R. Griffin Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance John M. Gullixson Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations Iry Pickier Dan Dillon, Accounting Manager William G. Steiner James A. Wahner Grace H. Winchell ABSENT: Peer A. Swan, Chairman Evelyn Hart 1. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE MISSION STATEMENT. At the January meeting, the Committee deferred until February a discussion of the "mission" of the Committee. The Committee reviewed the following excerpt from the Boards' adopted "Rules of Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the Districts," which establish the Fiscal Policy Committee and its role, and decided that it appropriately described the Committee's current mission. Director Pickier abstained from the vote. "13. STANDING COMMITTEES: (b) FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - There shall be a permanent Fiscal Policy Committee to advise the staff in matters relative to the financial and budget policies of the Joint Administrative Organization. The Committee shall review with staff the procedures for development, preparation and format of the annual Joint Works budgets and recommend appropriate changes, and counsel the staff during the budget process to assure the proper interpretation and implementation of the Boards' policies and that the desired procedures have been followed. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 2 February 16, 1994 The Committee is not responsible for recommending adoption of proposed budgets to the Executive Committee or the Boards of Directors. However, the Committee, at its discretion may so recommend and/or comment on said budgets as deemed appropriate by its members. The responsibility for consideration and adoption of the respective individual District budgets rests with each individual District Board. The Fiscal Policy Committee is further authorized to review other fiscal policy matters of the Joint Administrative Organization, or the Districts severally or individually, as assigned by the Executive Committee or Boards, and report findings and recommendations to the Executive Committee, such as: - Recommendations of Districts' independent CPA Auditors - Revenue Program Policies - Procurement Policies - Insurance - Debt Financing Policies - Other studies and investigations, as requested by the Fiscal Policy Committee and approved by the Executive Committee The Committee shall consist of nine Directors appointed by the Joint Chairman. To the extent possible, the membership shall represent a cross section of the Districts. It is deemed desirable that at least one member of the Executive Committee be a member of the Fiscal Policy Committee. The Chairman of the Fiscal Policy Committee shall be appointed by the Joint Chairman. The Fiscal Policy Committee shall meet at the call of its Chairman." 2. PROFESSIONAL AUDIT SERVICES. The last three-year independent audit services agreement with KPMG Peat Marwick expired with completion of the 1992-93 audit which was approved by the Boards at the November 10, 1993 meeting. Accordingly, staff sought Committee guidance regarding professional audit services for fiscal year 1993-94. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 3 February 16, 1994 Some of the options the Committee considered were: 1. To seek bids from the "Big Six" audit firms. 2. To seek bids from all firms except KPMG. 3. To negotiate a one-year extension with KPMG for fiscal year 1993-94. 4. To negotiate a multi-year extension with KPMG. The Committee agreed that auditors are required to gain and document an understanding of a government's internal control structure as part of the audit planning process, and that this process is especially costly in the first year of an audit because the auditors are becoming acquainted with and documenting the internal control structure for the first time. A multi-year audit contract, such as the one just concluded, has the advantage of allowing auditors to recover these and similar start-up costs over a longer period of time, and so can lead to lower overall audit costs. Also, multi-year audit contracts can help to create needed continuity in the audit process. The Committee also reviewed mandatory rotation of auditors. Those in favor of the concept often refer to the need for "new blood" and a "fresh perspective." On the other hand, others typically cite the benefits of "continuity" and "experience." Under current professional standards applicable to auditors, there is no ethical limitation on the number of consecutive years that an auditor may continue to audit a given client. The Committee and staff agreed that a policy of rotating auditors is desirable. However, staff reported to the Committee that there are some special circumstances this year, including the recent hiring of KPMG to perform a focused review of the Districts' internal control policies and practices. This review is expected to begin in April 1994, and will overlap with the customary preliminary annual audit activities for 1993-94. Further, Deloitte & Touche was selected at the last Board meeting to provide professional consulting services for the needs assessment and RFP preparation in connection with the selection of a new financial information system. The Districts' Accounting Manager will serve as the Districts' project manager for this very important process. Staff and Deloitte & Touche have projected significant involvement of the project manager in order to successfully complete this project. As one of the Accounting Manager's other major responsibilities is the annual outside audit, the Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 4 February 16, 1994 combination of the time required to select a new financial information system and to orient a new auditing firm unfamiliar with the Districts, may overtax available staff resources. Staff, therefore, recommended option No. 3 above. Committee Recommendation After consideration of all of the above, the Fiscal Policy Committee recommends: A. Staff be authorized to solicit a proposal from KPMG Peat Marwick, and to negotiate with them for a one-year extension of the expired agreement for professional audit services to conduct the 1993-94 annual audit. The proposal would be returned to the Directors for consideration at a future meeting. B. Staff solicit proposals from other "Big Six" audit firms, and others that have asked to be included, for a multi-year engagement beginning in 1994-95 for consideration at a later Committee meeting. 3. TRAINING. TRAVEL AND MEETING EXPENSE REVIEW. In July, the Boards reaffirmed the Districts' training, travel and meeting expense policy and asked staff to prepare a quarterly report of expenses for the Fiscal Policy Committee's review. Accordingly, the Committee reviewed the second quarterly report covering the first six months of 1993-94. In addition to the Joint Operating (JO) expenses, travel to inspect equipment fabrication for a capital project and the initial training required for a new facility may be appropriately capitalized and charged to that project and, accordingly, such costs are paid through the respective capital fund, generally the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF). These charges were also included in the report. 4. SIX-MONTH 1993-94 BUDGET REVIEW. The Committee reviewed the enclosed summary statements of the Joint Works Operating Costs (JO [light green]), the Joint Works Capital Improvement Program (CORF [yellow]), and the costs of the workers' compensation (pink), public liability (salmon) and health plan (goldenrod) self-insurance funds for the first six months of fiscal year 1993-94. With one-half of the year gone, 45.6% of the net joint operating budget has been expended. Net costs are down $790,802 or 3.4%, compared with the same period last year. Line item cost increases are primarily due to November 1992 MOU adjustments, for a net salaries and benefits increase Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 5 February 16, 1994 of $647,165; increased odor and sulfide control chemical costs of $361,012; increased research environmental monitoring of $243,765; and additional natural gas costs of $769,604. More than offsetting operational savings have been realized from the operation of the Central Power Generation Facilities resulting in a decrease of $2,433,738 for purchased electrical power. Smaller increases or decreases in other categories make up the balance of net costs. At the same time, flows have decreased 2.9%. Therefore, the net decrease in costs offset by the decreases in flows have resulted in a $2.44 per million gallons decrease in the unit cost to treat and dispose of sewage, to $550.41 per million gallons. Joint Works construction project costs for the first three months are lower than originally scheduled, running at 24% of the 1993-94 budget, or $16.9 million. Several projects have been recently awarded or are scheduled to be awarded in the near future, and progress payments on these projects will increase the CORF outlay over the remainder of the year. 5. REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT PROGRAM MONITORING. The Boards have authorized staff to enter into two six-month $50 million reverse repurchase agreements using the services of the County Treasurer's office. The net arbitrage earnings from these two transactions over the next six months will be $838,496. At the January Committee meeting staff reported on how these two reverse repurchase agreements are being monitored. Staff monitors the price of these two FNMA securities using the on-line Bloomberg financial system authorized by the Boards, and periodically reviews the program with the County Treasurer. Staff reported that as of February 16, 1994, the value of each security was as shown in the following table. Although the securities are valued at a discount in the current interest rate environment, they will earn the coupon interest until maturity and need not be sold at a loss. I.D.No. Reversal Rate Rollover Coupon Market Price 31364AYT3 3.25% 04/28/94 5.10% 99181ti 31364AH62 3.30% 05/02/94 4.94% 9911/32 6. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN DAILY EFFORT (PRIDE). The Committee reviewed several PRIDE suggestions that staff had submitted for consideration and evaluation. Certificates and cash awards totaling $2,218.40, in accordance with the Board-approved PRIDE program, are Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 6 February 16, 1994 summarized in the enclosed staff report (lavender). These four PRIDE proposals are estimated to save the Districts approximately $20,184.00 annually. 7. FUTURE MEETING DATES. One of the Fiscal Policy Committee's major responsibilities is to oversee the preparation of the Joint Works Operating and Capital Budgets. These budgets are presented to the Executive Committee in May of each year. Historically, the Fiscal Policy Committee has met monthly during the Joint Works Budget preparation process. Accordingly, Committee meetings have been tentatively scheduled on the standard third Wednesday of each month, March 16th, April 20th, May 18th; and jointly with the Executive Committee on May 25, 1994, the fourth Wednesday. GGS:Ic aF:J:\W PDGQRMF1'C.FRGIFPC3.8C Enclosures 2/9/94 JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET REVIEW & SUMMARY COMPARISON OF BUDGETED & ACTUAL EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEAR TO DATE 1993-94 (A) (8) ICI (D) (E) (F) 1G) Budget Expenditures Expenditures Increase % Increase % Budget Remaining 1993-94 through through or (Decrease) Realized Budget 12/31/93 12/31/92 (Decrease) 1. Net Salaries, Wages & Benefits $26,170,000 $12,411,953 $11,764,788 $647,165 5.50 % 47.43 % $13,758,047 2. Odor Control & Chemical Coagulants 4,154,000 1,537,018 1,372,055 164,963 12.02 % 37.00 % 2,616,982 3. Contractual Services 6,702,000 3,442,016 3,377,748 64,268 1.90 % 51.36 % 3,259,984 4. Professional Services 904,000 319,532 382,838 (63,306) (16.54)% 35.35 % 584,468 5. Equipment Charges. 235,000 108,016 112,382 (4,366) (3.88)% 45.96 % 126,984 6. Repair & Maintenance Materials & Services. 3,870,000 1,685,688 1,779,693 (94,005) 15.28)% 43.56 % 2,184,312 7. Research & Monitoring• 3,431,000 1,380,159 1,136,394 243,765 21.45 % 40.23 % 2,050,841 8. Utilities. 3,650,000 1,783,918 3,270,475 (1,486,5571 (45.45)% 48.87 % 1,866,082 9. Other Materials, Supplies & Outside Services. 3,963.000 1,679,989 1,820,811 (140,8221 (7.73)% 42.39 % 2,283,011 10. Total Joint Operating Expenses $53,079,000 $24,348,289 $25,017,184 ($668,895) (2.67)% 45.87 % $28,730,711 11. Revenues & Offsets. (3,500,000) (1,758,042) (1,636,135) (121,907) 7.45 % 1 50.23 % 1 (1,741,958) 12. NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE $49,579,000 $22,590,247 $23,381,049 ($790,802) 13.38)% 45.56 % $26,988,753 13. Gallonage Flow (MG) 89,421.48 41,042.32 42,291.81 (1,249.49) 12.95)% 45.90 % 14. Gallonage Flow (MGD) 244.99 223.06 229.85 (6.79) 12.95)% 15. Gallonage Charge IS's/MGI $554.44 $550.41 $ 552.85 ($2.44) (0.441% FPCR1293.XLS 9:36 AM 2n/94 PAGE JOINT OPERATING FUND & WORKING CAPITAL FUND SUMMARY BUDGET REVIEW 6 MONTHS ENDED 12.31-93 A B C D E F G H EXP EXP %EXP INCR INCR BUDGET THRU BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING (DECRI (DECR) DESCRIPTION 1992-93 12-31-92 1993-94 12-31-93 12.31-93 BUDGET 9 % SALARIES.WAGES. &BENEFITS 1 SALARIES&WAGES 27.043,000 13,139,140 30,053.000 14.524,896 48.33 15,528,104 1,385,756 10.55 2 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS: 3 RETIREMENT 3,050,000 929,290 2,044,000 888,878 43.49 1,155,122 (40,412) (4.35) 4 WORKERS COMP 225,000 112,501 225,000 112,501 50.00 112,499 0 0.00 5 UNEMPLOYMENT INS 65,000 33,027 75.000 12,810 16.81 62,390 (20,417) (61.82) 6 GROUP INSURANCE 2,166,000 1,815,804 3,873,000 1,734,939 44.80 2,138,061 (80,865) (4.45) 7 UNIFORM RENTAL 100,000 36,234 100.000 29,835 29.84 70,165 (6,399) (17.66) 8 TOTAL BENEFITS 5,W6,000 2,926,856 6,317,000 2,778,763 43.99 3,538,237 (148,093) (5.06) 9 SALARIES,WAGES,&BENEFITS 32,649,000 16,065,996 36,370,000 17,303,659 47.58 19.066.341 1.237.663 7.70 10 W.O.SALARIES &BEN.ALLOC.: 11 DIRECT CHARGES-CORF/DIST (4,800.000) (2,403,812) (5,500,000) 12,631,758) 47.86 (2.868,2421 (227,946) 9.48 12 COST ALLOC-CORF/DIST (3,950.000) (1,897.396) (4,700,000) (2,259,948) 48.08 (2,440,052) (362,652) 19.11 13 W.O.SALARIES &BENEFITS (8,750,OW) (4,301,208) (10.200,000) (4,891,706) 47.96 (5,308,294) 1590,49M 13.73 14 NET J.O. PAYROLL 23,899,000 11,704788 26,170.000 12411,953 47.43 13.758,047 647,165 5.50 MATERIALS.SUPPLIES. &SERVICES 15 GASOLINE. DIESEL&OIL 225,000 $3.726 220,000 91,070 41.40 128,930 7.344 8.77 15 INSURANCE 1,190,000 490.700 1,165,000 537,138 46.11 627,862 46,438 9.46 17 MEMBERSHIPS 58,000 28,784 58,000 28,945 49.91 29,055 161 0.56 18 OFFICE EXPENSE-SUPPLIES 165,000 79,040 175,000 69,873 39.93 105,127 (9,167) 111.60) 19 OFFICE AUTOMATION 0 38,000 105,000 57,984 55.22 47,016 19,984 52.59 20 OFFICE EXPENSE- OTHER 110,000 46.087 115,000 56,092 48.78 58,908 10.005 21.71 21 OPERATING SUPPLIES: 22 CHLORINE&ODOR CONTROL 2,171,000 623,950 1,942,000 793,708 40.87 1,148,292 169,758 27.21 23 SULFIDE CONTROL 660,000 80,120 434.000 271,374 62.53 162,626 191,254 238.71 24 CHEMICAL COAGULENTS 1,649,000 667,985 1,778,000 471,936 26.64 1,306,064 (196,049) (29.35) 25 LAB CHEMICALS &SUPPLIES 400,000 323.347 550.000 247.683 45.03 302,317 (75,664) (23.40) 26 TOOLS 125,000 35,924 115,000 56,994 49.56 58,006 21,070 58.65 27 SOLV,PAINTS, &JAN.SUPPLIE 190,000 81,155 175,000 67,636 38.65 107,364 113,619) (16.66) 28 OTHER OPERATING SUPPLIES 260,000 139,033 265,000 104,553 39.45 160.447 (34,480) (24.801 29 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 30 GROUNDSKEEPING&JANITORIA 80,000 36,972 285,000 113,221 39.73 171,779 76,249 206.23 31 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES 175,000 29,398. 150,000 32,618 21.75 117,382 3,220 10.95 32 SOLIDS REMOVAL 6.110,000 2,889,471 5,540,000 2,779,467 50.17 2,760,533 (110,004) (3.81) 33 OTHER WASTE DISPOSAL 100,000 16,641 75,000 77,060 102.75 (2,060) 60,419 363.07 34 OXYGEN PLANT OPER&MTCE 468,000 218,565 490,000 239,067 48.79 250.933 20.502 9.38 35 OTHER 440,000 186,701 162,000 200,583 123.82 138,5831 13.882 7.44 36 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 37 GENL,LASOR&SPEC COUNSEL 650,000 239,878 650,000 181,865 27.98 468.136 (68,013) (24.181 38 AUDIT&ACCOUNTING 56,000 69,750 60.000 67.760 112.92 (7,7501 (2,000) (2.871 39 ENGINEERING 150,WO 1,235 53,000 0 0.00 53,000 (1,235) (100.00) 40 OTHER 370,000 71,975 141,000 69,917 49.59 71,083 (2,058) (2.86) FPC1293.XLS-2n/94-10:02 AM 2094 PAGE 2 JOINT OPERATING FUND &WORKING CAPITAL FUND SUMMARY BUDGET REVIEW 6 MONTHS ENDED 12-31-93 A B q D E F G H EXP EXP %EXP INCR INCR BUDGET THRU BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING (DECK) IDECRI DESCRIPTION 1992.93 12.31-92 1993-94 12.31-93 12-31-93 BUDGET 8 % 41 PRINTING&PUBLICATION: 42 REPRO-IN-HOUSE 165,000 93.964 190,000 104,905 55.21 85,095 10,941 11.64 43 PRINTING-OUTSIDE 110,000 42,857 85,000 20,345 23.94 64.655 122,512) (52.531 44 PHOTO PROCESSING 35.000 15,791 35,000 17,488 49.97 17.512 1.697 10.75 45 NOTICES&ADS 100,000 12,780 35.000 18,183 51.95 16.817 5.403 42.28 46 RENTS&LEASES: 47 OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 110,000 53,470 110.000 51.373 46.70 58,827 42,0971 (3.92) 48 DISTRICT EQUIPMENT RENTAL 125,000 58,912 12510D0 66,843 46.31 68,357 (2,269) (3.851 49 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE: 50 MATERIALS 3,500,000 1,586,510 3,5D0,000 1,409,801 40.27 2.090.399 (175,909) (11.09) 51 CONTRACTS 344,000 194,183 370,000 276,087 74.62 93.913 81.904 42.18 52 RESEARCH&MONITORING: 53 ENVIRO MONITORING 1,946.000 853.288 2,237.000 1,163.339 52.00 1.073,661 310,061 38.34 54 AIR QUALITY MONITORING 0 0 620,000 S00 0.08 619,500 S00 100.00 55 RESEARCH 960,000 283.106 574,000 216.320 37.69 357,680 (66,7861 (23.59) 56 TRAVEL TRAINING &MEETINGS 250,000 82,357 226.000 $7,351 38.82 137,649 4,994 6.06 57 UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS 10,000 20,911 10.00D 11,931) (18.311 11.831 (28,742) (106.W) 58 UTILITIES: 59 DIESEL FOR GENERATORS 200,000 53,201 125,000 40,017 32.01 84,983 (13,184) (24.781 80 POWER 2,473,000 2,997.937 1,100,000 564,199 51.29 535,801 (2,433.7381 (81.181 61 NATURAL GAS 1,284,ODO 53.697 1.900,000 823,301 43.33 1,076,699 769,604 1.433.23 62 TELEPHONE 125,000 30,846 125.000 66,353 53.08 58,647 35,707 116.51 63 WATER 340.000 134.994 400.000 290.048 72.61 109,952 155,054 114.86 64 OTHER EXPENSES: 65 FREIGHT 45,000 20,321 45,000 34,328 76.28 10,672 14,007 68.93 66 GENERAL 450,000 285,374 fi00,0DO 310,692 51.78 289.308 25,318 8.87 57 AOMD OPERATING FEES 325.000 112,821 285,000 39,043 13.70 24S,957 (73,7781 165.39) 68 PRIOR YEARS EXPENSE 100.GD0 (4,954) 50,000 179.280) (158.58) 129.280 (74.326) 1.500.32 69 OTHER NON-OPER EXPENSE 60.000 20.29S 60,OW 31,758 52.93 28,242 11,463 56.48 70 TOTAL MATLS.BUFF,&SERV 28,849,000 13.485,898 27,509,000 12,157,297 44.19 15.351.703 (1.328,601) 19.85) 71 COST ALLOC-CORF&OTHER (600,000) (233.5021 (6DO,000) (220.961) 36.83 (379,039) 12,541 (5.37) 72 NET J.O:MATLS,BUFF,&SERV. 28,249,000 13,252,396 26,909,000 11.936.336 44.36 14,972,664 (1,316,060) (9.931 73 TOTAL J.O. REQUIREMENTS 52,148,000 26,017,184 53.079.000 24,348.289 45.87 28,730.711 (668.895) (2.671 74 LESS: JOINT REVENUES (3,510,000) (1,678,503) (3,510,000) (1,766,S69) SO.33 41,743,431) 4381066) 5.25 75 REVENUE ALLOC-CORFIDIST 10,000 42,368 10,000 8,527 85.27 1.473 (33.8411 (79.87) 76 LESS NET REVENUES (3,500.000) (1.636.135) (3,500,000) (1.758,042) 50.23 (1,741,958) (121,9071 7.45 77 NET J.O. EXPENDITURES 48.648.000 23.381,049 49,579,000 22.590,247 45.56 26,988,753 1 (790,802) (3.38) FPC1293.XLS-2179410:02 AM JOINT OPERATING FUND&WORKING CAPITAL FUND BUDGET REVIEW 6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/93 SUMMARY OF REVENUES REV REV REV INCR INCR BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING THRU (DECR) (DECR) DESCRIPTION 1993.94 12-31-93 12-31-93 BUDGET 12-31-92 $ % INTER DIST SEWER USE 1,200.000 548,155 45.68 651,845 495,140 53,015 10.71 WASTEHAULER 400,000 242.638 60.66 157.362 190,357 52,281 27.46 IRWD SLUDGE DISPOSAL 1,000,000 404.299 40.43 595.701 395,805 8,494 2.15 WASTE HAULER PENALTIES 10,000 0 0.00 10,000 0 0 0.00 DIGESTER GAS SALES 10,000 0 0.00 10,000 0 0 0.00 SCRAP SALES 10,000 9.752 97.52 248 3,654 6,098 166.89 OTHER SALES 5.000 898 17.95 4.102 681 217 31.79 SLUDGE REUSE 10.000 0 0.00 10.000 2,066 (2,066) -100.00 RENTS& LEASES 100.000 51,500 51.50 48,500 109,933 (58.433) -53.15 CONTRIBUTION IN AID 0 0 100.00 0 150,378 (150,378) -100.00 GENERAL NON-OPERATING 200,000 26,311 13.16 173.689 27.622 (1,311) -4.75 VEHICLE & EQUIP 250,000 114,324 45.73 135.676 113,496 828 0.73 MAILING FEE 5,000 850 17.00 4.150 183 667 364.48 SAMPLING CHARGES 200.000 114,256 57.13 85.744 101.081 13.175 13.03 PRIOR YEAR INCOME 50,000 0 0.00 50,000 0 0 0.00 POWER SALES 50,000 245.059 490.12 195,059 0 245.059 100.00 TOTAL REVENUES 3,500.000 1.758.042 50.23 1,741.958 1,590,396 167,646 10.54 1125194 CSDOC JOINT OPERATING WORK ORDER SUMMARY 6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31193 6 Months 6 Months 6 Months 5 % Ended Ended Ended INCR/(DECK) INCR/(DECR) Dec-91 Dec-92 Dec-93 FROM PR. YEAR FROM PR. YEAR COLL, DIVER. & INTERPLANT 82,674 94,980 40,740 (54,240) 157.11%) HEADWORKS 850,525 867,774 843,710 (24,064) (2.77%) PRIMARY TREATMENT 2,847,216 3,709,362 2,797,875 (911,487) (24.57%) SECONDARY TREATMENT 1,610,644 1,820,238 1,268,145 (552,093) 130.33%) SOLIDS HANDLING 3,930,694 4,303,597 4,080,910 (222,687) (5.17%) EFFLUENT CHLORINATION 98,515 112,127 62,942 (49,185) (43.87%) EFFLUENT DISPOSAL 793,235 831,568 318,366 (513,202) (61.71%) SUPERVISORY CONTROL 1,193,495 1,249,834 1,080,851 (168,983) (13.52%) UTILITY SYSTEMS 1,199,636 1,259,304 2,740,113 1,480,809 117.59% GENERAL PLANT COMPLEX 1,503,152 2,576,510 2,643,530 67,020 2.60% ODOR CONTROL 2,143,907 2,003,561 1,952,784 (50,777) (2.53%) GENERAL ENGINEERING 452,466 481,947 125,268 (356,679) (74.01%) INDUSTRIAL WASTE 548,318 548,002 428,375 - (119,627) (21.83%) LABORATORIES & RESEARCH 2,732,695 3,125,622 3,843,753 718,131 22.98% MOTOR POOL NET CHARGES 197,335 202,852 182,882 (19,970) (9.84%) ELECTRIC CARTS 95,051 100,677 77,101 (23,576) (23.42%) PORTABLE EQUIPMENT 88,602 93,094 102,902 9,808 10.54% TOTAL J. O. EXPENSE 20,368,160 23,381,049 22,590,247 1790,802) (3.38%) WOSU1293ALS--10:55 AM CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-1 SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 1 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1993.94 8 MONTHS ENDED 12/31193 Prepared By: Bill Aldridge (11 (21 (3) (4) (5) (6) WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET 199394 1993-94 @ 6/30193 TO 12/31/93 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 -3 A. New and Rebudgeted Mdor Protect.: 1.Westehauier Disp&Sample Stn Pt-27-11213 51942-A,B 305,000 200000 2 2 20000D Transfer to Projects Below (176,591) (176.591) Chemical and Wasteheuler Facility Modllne,PI-46 52239-A 1,400,000 142,519 6,817 142.519 149,336 0 Interim Waalehauler Dumping fee,of 46.1 52239 C 217,000 34.072 34.072 34.072 0 2.Secondary Trmt Expansion to 80 MGD,Pt-36 53)1)0 36,222,000 760,000 3.329,262 205,697 3,534,959 544.303 Transfer to Projects Below (35,035) (11,473) 0 111,473) Electrification of Pump Drives,of-36-1 53717-A 6,318 61318 (6,318) Secondary Treatment Expansion,P136-2 63)1)-8 2.928 2,928 (2,928) Bldg 5 Mor ifn for Reloc of Source Control Inspectors to Make Way for PI-36 62166-0 35,035 11,473 14,676 12,783 27,458 11,310) 3. Primary Treatment 72 MGD Expansion,P137 63719.0 31,425,000 60 '000 115,210 1,443 116,663 498,557 4.Security&Landscaping.PI-38-1 52108 F 1,630.000 11000,000 200,666 64,036 264.691 935,984 5.Mi... Mods.Priority Elements Pt-38-2 52108.G 6,370,000 3,600,000 760,059 520.858 1,270,917 2,979,142 6. Mac. Modification.P1-38-4 6210E-H 4,104000 2.OD%000 341,141 22.230 363.371 1,977,770 Transfer to Project Below (684,000) 0 12KV Distribution System for Support Facilities.P1-47 52266.0 584.000 0 0 0 ). Fire Protection,Signage and Water Dist.Mods..P138.5 52108-J 2,476.000 150.000 174,346 68.415 242,761 81,585 S.Elect Facility Modllns&Safety Upgratlea,P1.40.1 52187-A 2,902,500 200,000 16,803 10,926 2),)28 189.076 S.Fes,Mocifm Is Safety Upgratlea,PL40-2 52187-9 4,608,000 500,000 33,670 106,083 139J53 393,917 Transfer to Project Below 134,222) (34,222) Mac Architectural&Treatment Ht Improvements,PO4 52268-0 1.625.600 34.222 34,222 34.222 0 10, Prim Clarifiers 3.4&5 Rehab. Pt-41 52199-A 2,021,600 76,000 20,988 6,686 27,654 68,314 11.Mlsc Improvements,P1 42,P1.46 52219-0 2.205.000 1401000 14,353 78,093 92.446 61,907 12.Saimic Retrofit of Non-Structure Systems,PI-43 52229-A 4,260,000 I,60g000 50,856 57,289 108,146 1,442,711 13.Seismic Retrofit Structual.P1.44 52125-9 24,OOOA00 70D,000 304.410 359,403 663,813 340,597 14.40 MGD Oxygen Activated Sludge&DAF'e 70,000,000 0 0 15. Belt Pre....14 Units) 16,60%ODD 0 0 16.Sands Storage 14 Sinai I1'"'W0 0 0 17.Digesters: 2 @ 110'Diameter 9,100.000 0 0 18. 12kv Electrical Power Distribution 2,300,000 0 0 19.Emergency Sewage Bypass System 4,000,000 0 0 20.Remove Trickling Filters 1 &3 1'00%000 0 0 21.Central Air Compressor Station 250,000 0 0 22.Miec.Projects (Sea Schedule CI 13,250,000 2,000,000 ),16) 9).3)4 0 104,631 1,902.626 23, Other Master Plan Projects 0 0 a.Headworks No. 1 Rebuild,2003 14,950,000 0 0 b.Headworks No.2 lmpeller/Pump Speed,201If 2,600.000 0 0 c. A...so Trickling Filter.2&4,2007 1,300,000 0 0 d.40 MBE Oxygen Act'd Sludge&OAF,2017 34.00O,OOD 0 0 a. 110'ft Digesters,2003&2012 18,200,000 0 0 I.4 Belt Presses, 2004 10,920,000 0 0 g. 12 KV Power Distribution,200I-2012 111001000 0 0 In.Standby Power Generation, 2005 Is 2015 610001000 0 0 1.72 Mgd Primary Treatment,2004&2012 32.600.000 0 0 SUBTOTAL -RECLAMATION PLANT 1 3)2,624,600 13,215.000 6,380,384 1,831,3)0 0 7,211,758 11,383,628 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B 1 SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 2.14 FISCAL YEAR 1993 94 6 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/93 (1) 12) (3) 14) 161 (6) WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET 1993-94 1993-94 @ 9/30/93 TO 12/31/93 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 .3 B.Plant 2 New and Rebudgeted Major Projects: 1.S.Ppat Facilities and Site Improvement. e.Operations Building.P233 5-1 53715-0.A 2,610,000 11500,000 549.799 932.480 1,482.279 567,520 b.Warehouse Building,P2-35-2 61813-H 2.625.000 1.400,000 181,729 39,029 220.758 1,360,971 c.Maintenance Building.P2.363 51813-F 2,725,000 118001000 163,133 21.226 184,359 1,778.774 d.Construction Management Office,P2-35 4 51813.G 80,000 60,000 145,874 36,606 182,480 13,394 e.Phase ll Site&Security imp.,P2-36-5 51813-E 2.100.000 8501000 97,383 10,429 107.812 839,671 2. Rehab Digester 1,J. K,P239.1 52045-0 7.926,000 100,000 415.911 1.707 417.618 98,293 3. Rehab Digester L,M,P2-39-2 3,800,000 100,g00 0 100.000 4. Rehab Digester N,0,P2-39-3 4.800,000 100,000 0 100,000 5.Primary Treatment 24 MOD Expansion,P2-41 53714.0 15,204,500 4.501 96 4.597 (98) 6. Electrification Project,P2.42.1 53718-A 10.1501000 I60,000 9,483.057 579.566 10,002,623 (429,5661 7.Secondary Treatment Expansion,P2-42-2 63718.O,8 17,100,000 B.00 ,wal 2,168.619 4,206,847 6.455,466 3.713,163 S. Priority Misc.Mod.,P2 43 1 52108.0 5.750,000 3.000.000 952,633 1,513,188 2,465,721 1,486,812 S. Misc.Modifications.P2-43-3, P2-55 52108-E,52239 B 7,555,000 2,600,000 73,557 149,448 223,OO5 2.350.652 10.Monimr/Convcl Byemm,P2.4415ee J-23.21 62094-0 3.228,000 275,000 1.898.145 69,095 1,967,240 205,905 11.Mrs Protecdon,Signs&Water Dist.Modifna,P2-46 62176.0 4.864,000 150,000 62,270 97,221 159,491 52.779 12.Eleod Fac Modifna as Safety Upgrade.,P2.474 52189-A 3.452,500 200,000 8,698 5,722 14,420 194,278 13.Fac Modifns&Safety Upgrades,P2-47-2 52189.0 4,006,000 600,OOO 19.061 107,513 126.574 392.487 14.Primary Clarifier Rehab. P2-48 52199.0 5.247,000 400.000 63,912 7,167 71,079 392,833 IS.Misc Improvements at Plant 2,P2.49 52220-0 303,000 200.000 15.538 37,484 53,022 162,516 16.Selmlc Retrofit of r1cm-Slmctur.System.,P2.60 52229-6 4,750,000 2,000,000 113,068 17,888 130,966 1,982,112 17.Seismic Retrofit Structural P2-53 62108-C 35,000,000 6,000,OOg 738.803 399,224 1,138,027 4,600,776 Transfer to Project Below (711881 17.188) Misc Seismic Modifies&Flare Improvements,P2 56 52269-0 239,000 7,188 7,188 7.188 0 18.Salida Storage: 2 Bins 5.200.000 0 0 19.Additional 106 Foot Digester 4.000,000 0 0 20.Plant Water Pump Station 1.200,000 0 0 21.Misc. Projects (Sao Schedule DI 13,180,000 2,000,000 58.505 145,193 0 203,698 1.854.607 22.Other Master Plan Projects 0 0 a.Replace Primary Basins A.8,C,2000 11,70%000 0 0 b.Standby Power Generation,2005&2015 10.0001000 0 0 c. Monitoring and Control System,2006 5201000 0 0 SUB-TOTAL TREATMENT PLANT 2 188,981,000 30,276,000 17,214,096 8,464,317 0 25,678,413 21,810.683 C.Offers Water Rod...tlon Plant. 1. Site Accuisilicn 5,IN 000 5000,COO 0 Blow 000 Transfer to Project Below 18081 16081 Reclmation Rent No. I Water Quality Management Stud 58231.0 280,000 808 608 608 0 2. Reclamation Plant 3 62133-A 401600,000 50,000 606,090 24,667 630,757 25.333 SUBTOTAL- RECLAMATION PLANTS 45,980.000 5,050,000 606.090 26,276 0 531,365 6,024,726 D. Interplant and Joint Facilities 0 1. Interplant FacllOes,69 63713.0 24,000.000 600,000 20.999,092 1,096,844 22,096,]3B 1696,8441 Transfer to Project Below (235,900) (14,077) (14,0771 Industrial Water Pipeline Extension at Plant 2 53713-A 235,900 14.077 24.728 226,232 250,960 1212,155) CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-1 SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 3 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1993.94 8 MONTHS ENDED 12/31/93 (t) (2) (31 M) 161 (B) WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED I ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET 1993.94 199394 IsM0193 TO 12131/93 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 .3 2.Support Facilities and Site Improvements a.Admin.Annex at Old Lab Site,J-30&J-11-1 62083-O.A 4,150.000 200,000 98,985 15,262 114,247 184.738 b.0peretion.1Control Center,J-23-1 53712-A 6,0001000 100,000 126,933 20,167 147,100 79,833 c.Computer Equipment,J-23.2 Ban P2.441 53712-8 2,525.000 25,000 2,073,454 87,479 2.160,933 (62,479) d.Personnel Building at Ph 1.J-26 63716.0 2,950,000 1,400,000 107,401 23,126 130,527 1,376,874 e.Demolition of Old Control Center 460,000 360,000 0 350,000 f.Demolition of Support Eldg.@P2,J-27 62084.0 1,300,000 6001000 89,952 0 69,952 600,000 g.Central Lob lmproyamem.Npgradi s J-17.1.2.3 52257-0 742.000 742.000 13,640 13,640 728,360 3.Control Generation Facility 0 0 0 ..Equipment Prepurchase.J-19A 53707-C 22,730,000 360,000 20,466,832 17,4071 (20,200,901) 258,524 367,407 b.Emission Purchase,J-1 BE 53707-A,B 3,100,000 0 3,050,080 0 12,104.580) 945,500 0 c.Plant 1 Facility,J-19-1 53707-A 20.800,000 300,000 20,419,110 684,194 21.103,304 (384,1941 d.Plant 2 Facility,J-19.2 53707-B 29,060,000 8001000 27.624,455 334,774 (27,981.0861 (21.057) 485,220 e. Engine Eyalugation and Restoration 315001000 210001000 0 2,000,000 Transfer to Projects Below (192,1661 (192.165) J49.2 Engine Damage Rehab @ Plant 2 63707-E 176,747 1.554,355 816,260 2,170,605 (439,5031 J-19.1 Engine Damage Rehab @ Plant 1 63707-F 16,418 354,941 23,680 378.621 18,262) 4.Waste Gas Flea,J-21.J-21A 52040-0 301000 51000 125.706 108,632 234.238 (103,632) 6.Outten Is Booster Pump Stations a. Repl.outran No. 1 Land Section.J-22-2 63711-A 1,640,000 40,000 1.601,490 36,663 1.637,153 4,337 It. Equipment Prepurchase J-15-A 53703-A 4,500,000 300.000 23,463 (50,7581 127.305) 350,758 c.Temp Cl2 Station for OutfNl No. 1 2,600,000 0 0 0 d. Second Discharge Header GOES'C' 4.425,000 25,000 0 251000 a.Replace 78'wit 20'Outfall to Deep Water 61,260,000 501000 0 501000 6.Computerized Facility Records and Owl.System J 25-1 582160 3,610,000 110001000 83,326 10,864 74,190 989,136 7.Send.Power Systems Rehab.Studies J-25-2 6821E-A 6001000 300,000 1,643 1,643 298,357 B.Telophoneaelemetry Monitoring Exp.J-28 52146-0 630,000 400,000 56,297 311,360 387,657 B8,840 9.Standby Power Reliability Moulins,J-33 52240.0 16,0001000 1,0D0,000 2.188 303,965 308,151 696,035 10.0...R Outlet Reliability Upgrade.,J-34 62241-0 14.000.000 2.000,000 2,147 307.235 309.382 1.692.765 11.Bushard Interplant Trunk Replacement 31,000,000 0 0 0 12. Sludge Disposal Projects 0 0 0 a.Compost Demonstration Plant 9,0001000 0 0 0 b.Lend Acquisition 21,950,000 100,000 0 100,0o0 c.Landfill Development Phase 28.600.000 0 0 0 d.Compost Facility 50,360,000 0 0 0 13.District Information Management Network 0 0 0 a. Malm.&Doer Mgmnt Computer System 52149 A 900.000 250,000 609,577 132,482 (5,299) 636,760 117,618 b.Lab Information Management System Upgrades 52149 B 250,000 250,000 16,334 9,919 28,263 240,081 c.PmcheainglAccountinglFinanclel Information System 52149-C 1.501.000 750.000 1,412 50,671 52,083 699,329 d.Network System Integration $20,000 340,000 10 340,000 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE B-1 SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Page 4 of 4 FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 6 MONTHS ENDED 12MI/93 (1) (2) 131 (4) Ml (6) WORK REVISED TOTAL REQUIRED ACCUMULATED CURRENT YEAR COMPLETED JOBS PROJECT UNEXPENDED ORDER PROJECT EST BUDGET COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST BUDGET 1993.94 1993-94 (Q16/30193 TO 12/31/93 FIXED ASSETS TO DATE 1 .3 14.Improved In-Rent Sampling Facilities 115.000 1001000 0 lo0,0o0 15.Effluent Sampler Systems J-32-1,2 52212.0 325.000 185.000 47,492 264.383 311,875 (79,383) 1 S.Other Master Ran Project. 0 0 0 a.Expend DOES'C'to North 2019 27,126,000 0 0 0 It.Sludge Disc.Landfill Phase ll 2011 15.800.000 0 0 0 c.Sludge Disp. Equip Phase I&II 2001 11,500,000 0 0 0 17.Water Quality Diversion and Treatment Study(SARI) 68221-0 120,000 20,000 0 0 0 0 20.000 1 B.Mien Projects (See Schedule E) 11,710,000 1.500,000 200.798 269,103 (11,702) 448,199 1,240,897 SUB-TOTAL -INTERPLANT&JOINT 429,258,000 16,892,000 99,640,538 4,879,103 (50,303.568) 54.216.071 11,012,897 SUBTOTAL - MAJOR PROJECTS 1.036.843.500 64,432,000 I 122.741.108 1 15,200.069 (50,303,56811 8).637,607 49,231,931 E.Special Proiects.Studies.Research&Development 1.Action Plan: a. NPDES Permit(Application) 58209-F 375,000 5010D0 340,307 13,986 364,293 36,014 b. NPDES Permit(Monitoring Changes) 100,000 so," 0 501000 2.Solids Treatment,Disposal and Reuse 1,150,000 150,000 0 150,000 Transfer to Reject Below 11.7101 (1,710) Sludge Disposal Related Projects 58214.0 7,710 254,441 1,710 256,161 0 3.Air Duality Control Program 0 0 a.Air Toxics Inventory(AB2588 w/PEEP) 11548.0DO 30010D0 0 300,000 It.Taxies and ROG Control:I iofilter R&D 58227-0 380,000 330,000 31,225 75,500 106,725 254,500 c.Air Emissions Source Control 50.000 50.0D0 0 50,Oo0 d.SCAOMO Rule 431.1:Sulfur Control 2001000 200,000 0 200,000 e.SCAOMD Rule 1179:Odor Control 6701" 420,000 0 420,000 I.SCAQMD Marketable Permits Program 50,000 50,000 0 501000 g.Taxics Risk Reduction Program 260,0D0 250.0DO 0 250,000 h.A.G.Database Development 76,000 60,Oo0 0 501000 4.Water Consary&Reclamation R&D Projects 850.000 100,000 0 100,000 Transfer to Project Below (38,1701 (19,845) 0 (19,845) Flow Monitoring for Water Condom Project Ph 1 Pan 3 582230 38.170 13.781 24,389 0 24,389 13,781 Ultraviolet Ught Pilot Rent 52133-C 6,064 2,"S 7,448 (1,384) 5.Eviornmentel Research&Development 2,785.0DO 500.000 0 5001000 Transfer to Projects Below (1,000,]391 (105,864) 0 (105,864) Devel&Appl of Molecular Tech to Detect Indicator&Pathogenic 0 0 Microorganisms in Treated WA9 NWRI Project WO-9 58228-0 453,918 47,824 160,463 99,924 280,287 (52,0001 Collaborative Naml Study Using Molecular Tech to Detect Hepetitus A Virus 0 0 &Virulence Factor Genes in E.Coli.NWRI Rol HR-92.0 58229-0 496,821 8,040 (18,175) (3%175) (57,3501 47,216 Spatial&Temporal Wastewater Discharge Rums Study 58230-0 50,000 501000 34,165 34,165 15,835 6. Master Plan Update 3.600.000 1001000 0 100,000 Transfer to Project Below (113061 11,3U81 Air Quality Management Implementation Plan 58232-0 3]5.000 1,306 1,308 1,306 0 SUB-TOTAL-SPECIAL PROJECTS 12.083.000 2.600.000 ]92.650 194.764 0 987,414 2,405,236 F. Equipment Items 48,469.000 3,DG0,0DO 248,25] 1,561,]fi6 11,214,623) 695.400 1,438.234 SUB-TOTAL-JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 1,09],396,600 70,032.000 123.]82,013 18,968,599 151,518,191) 89,220,421 53,076,401 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS COMPLETED AT 6/30/93 SCHEDULE F 6.389,222 (62.584) (143,118) 6,163.520 62,584 f] TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS 1,09],395,500 70.032,000 130,151,235 16.894.015 (51,661,3091 95.383.941 53.137,985 1/26194 QUARTERLY WORKERS' COMP SELF-INSURED FUND BUDGET REVIEW 6 MONTHS ENDED 12-31-93 A a c D E F G ACTUAL % OF BUDGET REMAINING ACTUAL TO DATE 1993-94 THROUGH THROUGH 1993-94 THROUGH INCREASE FROM BUDGET 12-31-93 12-31-93 BUDGET 12-31-92 (DECREASE) 7-1-79 EXPENDITURES 1 Salaries 10,000 0 0.00% 10,000 0 0 160,084 2 Claims 165,000 67,723 41.04% 97,277 83,349 (15,626) 1,528,152 3 Contractual Services 35,000 14,828 42.37% 20,172 15,105 (277) 180,428 4 Legal Services 5,000 0 0.00% 5,000 0 0 0 5 Professional Services 35,000 13.259 37.88% 21,741 15,713 (2,454) 252,047 6 Supplies &Other 12,000 669 5.58% 11,331 516 153 21,204 7 Sub Total 262,000 96.479 36.82% 165,521 114,683 (18,204) 2,185,060 8 Excess Loss Policy 60.000 18.368 30.61% 41,632 0 18,368 403,840 9 Total Expenditures 322.000 114,847 35.67% 207,153 114,683 164 2.588.900 REVENUES &RESERVES 10 In-Lieu Premiums 225,000 112.500 50.00% 112,500 112,500 0 2,119,588 11 Interest&Other 80,000 26.248 32.81% 53,752 30,245 (3.997) 919,987 12 Total Revenues 305.000 138.748 45.49% 166,252 142,745 (3,997) 3,039,575 13 Excess Revenue (Expense) (17,000) 23,901 (40,901) 28,062 (4,161) 450,675 14 Beginning Reserves 661,000 708,541 633,092 15 Transfers 0 0 250,000 16 Ending Reserves 644,000 732.442 661,154 700,675 WCQB1293.XLS 1128194 QUARTERLY PUBLIC LIABILITY SELF-INSURED FUND BUDGET REVIEW 6 MONTHS ENDED 12-31-93 A B C D E F G ACTUAL % OF BUDGET REMAINING ACTUAL TO DATE 1993-94 THROUGH THROUGH 1993-94 THROUGH INCREASE FROM BUDGET 12-31-93 12-31-93 BUDGET 12-31-92 (DECREASE) 7.1-79 EXPENDITURES 1 Salaries 1,000 0 0.00% 1,000 0 0 1,715 2 Claims 120.000 613 0.51% 119,387 450,672 (450,059) 845,516 3 Contractual Services 10.000 14,212 142.12% (4,212) 1,110 13.102 90,602 4 Legal Services 80,000 49,480 81.85% 30,520 107,521 (118.041) 1.140.442 5 Professional Services 10,000 237 2.37% 9,763 3,424 (3,187) 128,468 6 Supplies & Other 1,000 0 0.00% 1,000 0 0 0 7 Sub Total 222,000 64,542 29.07% 157,458 622,727 1558,185) 2.207,743 8 Excess Loss Policy' 0 0 0 0 0 406,217 9 Total Expenditures 222,000 64,542 29.07% 157,458 622,727 (558.185) 2,612,960 REVENUES & RESERVES 10 In-Lieu Premiums 0 0 0.00% 0 175,000 (175,0001 2,541.509 11 Interest& Other 225,000 151,351 67.27% 73,849 947,598 (796,2471 2,894.136 12 Allocation to Other Funds 1.000 0 0.00% 1.000 0 0 123.929 13 Reimbursement from Stop Loss 0 0 0.00% 0 0 152,449 14 Total Revenues 226.000 151,351 88.97% 74,549 1.122,598 1971,247) 6,712,023 15 Excess Revenue (Expense) 4.000 88,809 (82,809) 499,871 (413.062) 3,099,083 16 Beginning Reserves 3.211.000 3,252,254 2,184,884 17 Transfers 0 0 250,000 18 Ending Reserves 3,215.000 3,349,063 2,684,755 3,349.083 Districts have been entirely self-insured for liability exposures since 1988. This policy is reviewed by the Directors annually. PLOB1293.XLS 1126194 QUARTERLY SELF-FUNDED HEALTH PLAN BUDGET REVIEW 6 MONTHS ENDED 12-31.93 A B C D E F G ACTUAL %OF BUDGET REMAINING ACTUAL TO DATE 1993.94 THROUGH THROUGH 1993.94 THROUGH INCREASE mom BUDGET 12-31.93 12-31-93 BUDGET 12-31-92 IDECREASEI 711RS EXPENDITURES 1 Claims-Medical 2,989,000 1,004.362 33.60 1,984,638 1,084.726 (80.364) 11,717.666 2 -Dental 400,000 139,365 34.84 260,635 179,666 (40.3011 1,870.183 3 -Disability' 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 173.457 4 Sub-Total 3,389,000 1,143.727 33.75 2.245.273 1.264.392 (120.665) 13.761.306 5 Cont,..W.l Service. 90.000 58,065 64.52 31,935 45.544 12.521 505.932 6 Stop Loss lnauranee 115,000 55,025 47.85 59.976 66.588 (11.563) 912.723 7 Total Expenditure. 3.594.000 1.256,817 34.97 2.337.183 1.378.524 (119.7071 15.179.961 REVENUE 6 RESERVES 8 In-Lieu Prem. -CSDOC 1,489,000 1,047,748 70.37 441,252 515.114 532.634 7,857,940 9 - Employee. 494,000 223,565 45.26 270,435 187.641 35.924 1.698.469 10 Sub-Tate) 1.983,000 1,271,313 64.11 711,687 702.755 568.558 9,556.409 11 Reimburse from Stop Lt..Ins 0 76.482 (76,482) 0 76.482 772.760 12 SupplementN CSDOC Funding 1.611,000 120,747 7.50 1.490.253 915.492 (694.745) 4,814.652 13 Other 0 1.212 (1,212) 717 495 150,748 14 Total Revenues 3,594.000 1,469.754 40.89 2,124,246 1,518,964 (49.210) 15,294,S59 15 Excee.Revenue(E.pen.e) 0 212.937 (212.937) 142.640 70.497 114.608 16 Cash end Carry-over Be.... 184,000 15.305 (1,123) 17 Transfers 51,681 18 Ending R..... 184.000 228,242 aaaaaaaaa�141.317 114.608 'Disability insurance has been purchased rather then self-funded since December 1989 SFMQ1293.XLS February 10, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 91 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA IM4A EWB AVENUE STAFF REPORT RO DON9127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.LALIFORNIA 92728.8127 PROPOSED PRIDE AWARDS nlm e62-2411 During the past few months several Personal Responsibility in Daily Effort (PRIDE) proposals have been evaluated. Following is a summary of those safety or cost-saving proposals that staff recommends for certificates and cash awards, in accordance with the Board-approved PRIDE program. Two of these four PRIDE proposals are estimated to save the Districts approximately $20,184.00 annually, while the other two are safety improvements. The five recommended awards total $2,218.40. PRIDE No. 253 - Automatic Level Control. This proposal will automate the sluice gates on the trickling filters at Plant No. 1 thereby saving operator labor hours that are currently being utilized on a regular basis to manually control the incoming flow. The proposed award to Ron Wade for this suggestion is 10% of the first year savings, or $1,350.00. PRIDE No. 261 - Chlorine Solution Water Emergency Supply System. This suggestion proposes the installation of a six-inch bypass pipe with a backflow prevention device from the industrial water supply line into the plant water supply line in tunnel No. 1. This will provide water for continued chlorination of wastewater in the event of a plant water shutdown. Staff proposes a $100.00 cash award to Jeffrey Reed for this odor control suggestion. PRIDE No. 297 - Move Liahtinc for Safer Access. This proposal recommends relocating the florescent lights in the access tunnel to the C-Headworks grit lifts to a higher level. Raising these lights to over seven feet will eliminate the possibility of employees sustaining head injuries. This suggestion improves safety and the proposed award is $100.00 to be shared by Daniel Houck and Lynn Redman. PRIDE NO. 304 - Ventilation Enhancement. This proposal recommends joining the east and west ventilation ducting at the pump gallery at the new Plant 1 primary facilities, P1-33. This will eliminate the need for the exhaust fans by utilizing the natural convection to remove air from the area using the three stairwells and the ramp entrance. This proposal will save electrical costs with a first year's net savings of $6,684.00. A cash award of 10%, or $668.40 is proposed for Ron Wade. GGS:lc REF:J:IVMOLtf4 WGIMDES2-94 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOC. OF GOV'TS REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN • DRAFT ISSUED IN DECEMBER • 15 CHAPTERS/13 ELEMENTS. . . INCLUDING WATER QUALITY • SOME MANDATORY/SOME NOT • MARCH 4 CLOSE OF COMMENTS • APRIL 4 ADOPTION BY R.C. BUT ... REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN VS. EARTHQUAKE AND DEBATE • DELAY GROWTH MANAGEMENT 30-60 DAYS • DELAY REGIONAL MOBILITY 30-60 DAYS • DELAY AIR QUALITY 6 MONTHS • DELAY OTHER ELEMENTS 12 MONTHS • NEXT ACTION BY R.C. MARCH 3-4 • RCP WORKSHOP MARCH 3 DRAFT REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONTAINS 13 MAJOR ELEMENTS 1 . THE ECONOMY 2. GROWTH MANAGEMENT 3. REGIONAL MOBILITY 4. AIR QUALITY 5. HOUSING 6. HUMAN RESOURCES/SERVICES 7. FINANCE 8. OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION 9. WATER RESOURCES 10. WATER QUALITY (INCLUDES WW) 11 . ENERGY 12. HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT 13. INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ORANGE COUNTY'S REGIONAL ADVISORY AND PLANNING COUNCIL • JANUARY 20 ANALYSIS MAILED TO: SCAG R.C. MEMBERS O.C. CITIES OCTA TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR AGENCIES CSDOC • AWAITING RETURN COMMENTS • RAPC/ESC COMMENTS TO SCAG CLEAN AIR ACT ISSUES • CENTERPOINT IS CONFORMITY • NO FEDERAL "ACTION " WITHOUT IT • THE "HOOK" : OUR PERMIT • SCAG 'S FINDING IS NOT ENOUGH • EACH FEDERAL AGENCY HAS TO MAKE ITS OWN FINDING • FEDERAL AGENCIES CAN "BORROW" FINDINGS CLEAN WATER ACT ISSUES • REGIONAL PLANNING (SECTION 208) • SCAG DID 208 PLAN IN 1978 • WASTEWATER AGENCIES ON THEIR OWN • NEW COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING MANDATES • SCAG ASKS TO BE: COORDINATOR/LIAISON ENSURE CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER OBJECTIVES REVIEW WW FACILITY PLANS FOR POPULATION CONSISTENCY REGARDING CLEAN WATER ISSUES SANITATION DISTRICTS STAFF SUGGEST: - WASTEWATER TREATMENT AGENCIES LEAD - SCAG AS COORDINATOR, REPORTER , DATAKEEPER - POPULATION PROJECTIONS THRU CONSENSUS CLEAN AIR MANDATES MUST NOT INTERFERE WITH CLEAN WATER MANDATES CONTENTS OF THE WATER QUALITY CHAPTER (INCLUDING WASTEWATER) • CURRENT WATER QUALITY LAWS • DESCRIPTION OF WATER RESOURCES • WATER QUALITY IN SCAG REGION • CURRENT W.Q. MGMT FRAMEWORK • FUTURE REGIONAL ISSUES (INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS, POLICY OPTIONS, ACTIONS) SANITATION DISTRICTS STAFF RECOMMENDED FUTURE ACTION • CONVEY RECOMMENDED LANGUAGE CHANGES BY MARCH 4 • MONITOR NEW DRAFTS (S) • ADVOCATE THE PRINCIPLES OF: - COMPREHENSIVE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT - WW AGENCY LEADERSHIP - BALANCED ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - MAINTAINING CLEAN WATER OBJECTIVES WHAT DOES "CONFORMITY" WITH THE AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIRE OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT AGENCIES? 1 . WWTP FACILITIES MUST BE SIZED & SERVICE-PHASED ACCORDING TO POPULATION PROJECTIONS ADOPTED OR APPROVED BY SCAG . 2. WWTP AGENCIES MUST HAVE A REPORTING SYSTEM FOR SHARING INFORMATION . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .I ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Ip ELL19 AVENUE January 19, 1994 VO 90M 91b February EOVNIMN VALLEY.GL60GMA 927284121 Revised February 16, 1994 MI.,9s2.2.11 STAFF REPORT EVALUATION OF SCAG'S REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR WATER QUALITY ELEMENT (WHICH INCLUDES WASTEWATER TREATMENT) BACKGROUND In December, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) staff issued the initial draft of the Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) for the six-county area of Southern California, (excluding only San Diego County) . The draft contains 15 chapters and deals with 13 major elements: The Economy Growth Management Regional Mobility Air Quality Housing Human Resources and Services Finance Open Space and Conservation Water Resources Water Quality Energy Hazardous Waste Management Integrated Solid Waste Management It is a very ambitious undertaking. SCAG, in the introductory section of the RCP, states: "This document. . .sets a broad set of goals for the region, and identifies strategies for agencies at all levels to use in guiding their decision-making toward implementation of the proposal (contained within it) . . . "It is not a proscription for local government. Rather, it is a comprehensive overview of the region, focusing on its growth and problems, and it suggests a strategy that local governments may elect to use. . . in meeting these challenges. . . '-There are two types of components in the plan: those that respond directly to federal or state mandates, and those that are included in the interest of comprehensiveness. These latter are indispensable to the understanding of the former. . . --It must be clearly noted that the inclusion of any component or issue in this plan in no way changes the 1 (existing) mandates, or adds to them. These additions are intended to serve only as guidance and a framework. . . (for) . . . inform(ed) decisions on the mandates, on local plans, and on governance in general as it seeks to improve the quality of life for all (the) region's residents. . . " Because some of these elements are mandated by state and/or federal law while others are non-mandated and have been electively added to the plan, SCAG has had considerable consultation with various agencies and governmental bodies. SCAG staff has been in the process of drafting the RCP for over a year. The Plan has begun to receive considerable interest and comment. Over the next year the SCAG Regional Council will hold a number of meetings and workshops with the public and with decision- makers prior to adopting a completed document. Public commentary was scheduled to close March 4th and adoption by the SCAG Regional Council on April 7, 1994 . However, we have been informed by senior SCAG staff that it is now a near certainty that SCAG's Regional Council will decide to significantly delay this schedule. The January 17th earthquake caused several SCAG workshops to be cancelled. And there must be far more consultation between SCAG and the counties within the region because of the disagreements that have surfaced regarding the content of the RCP. For example, there is mounting uncertainty and concern voiced by some of the counties (including orange County) about whether all of the elements contained within the draft RCP should be included in the final RCP. For this reason, the final content and format of the RCP may be significantly different than the December 1993 draft. The actual review and adoption schedule is unknown at this time. SCAG staff is estimating that the Growth Management and Regional Mobility Elements may be delayed 30 to 60 days, the Air Quality Element by 6 months and the other elements by 12 months. We have heard conflicting interpretations about whether the Water Quality Element is mandatory or elective--which will affect when and if it is the subject of review for inclusion within the RCP. The Water Quality Element (copy attached) , which contains portions that are mandated, has direct interest to the Districts and is the subject of this staff report. STAFF SUMMARY ANALYSIS The Water Quality Element was drafted after consultation with representatives of public agencies and private firms. These representatives included staff from the Districts, several of our sister agencies, representatives of industry and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region. The 2 Water Quality Element describes a bottoms-up approach to managing the region's water resources. It emphasizes local government participation, flexibility and scientifically-based decision making for addressing the ever-changing water quality issues here in Southern California. The Districts' staff finds that, with one exception pertaining to conformity vis-a-vis to pacing wastewater facilities construction with population projections, which is discussed below, the Water Quality Element fully supports the Districts' objectives for providing balanced environmental protection and will not conflict with our 30-year Facilities Master Plan entitled 112020 VISION." In addition, the Water Quality Element's underlying philosophy of site-specific water quality decision-making complements the comprehensive watershed management initiative that Districts' staff has promoted along with other members of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (a nationally-based organization) and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (a state- wide organization) . Site-specific decision making has the potential advantage of giving local stakeholders (public and private) more involvement in setting priorities and expending resources. The Water Quality Element also supports a related chapter contained within the Administration's so called green book on water quality issues entitled, "President Clinton's Clean Water Initiatives", dated January 31, 1994. The Administration proposes the use of comprehensive watershed management which would focus attention within hydrologically-defined areas and engage stakeholders from all levels of government as well as the private sector. Under this concept, site-specific analysis of problems and locally-based implementation efforts would address any remaining water quality concerns, aquatic-living resources and human health issues of a watershed. Staff agrees with the interpretation of SCAG staff that regional wastewater planning is mandated by Section 208 of the federal Clean Water Act. Staff concurs with SCAG's conclusion that SCAG is presently in the best position to coordinate these activities as long as it is clearly stated in the RCP that the wastewater treatment agencies in this region must each have the lead decision-making responsibility within their respective service areas. Staff agrees with SCAG's interpretation that Section 176 of the federal Clean Air Act and EPA's Final Rule for determining conformity require that for projects, funding and permits to receive approval by federal agencies, they must conform to the air quality management plan for our region. This is relevant to the Districts because our ocean discharge permit is jointly issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and 3 the EPA (a federal agency) . But, for many of our sister wastewater treatment plants and other essential public services that have absolutely no expectation of ever having to receive federal approval, funding or permits, the conformity requirement of Section 176 of the federal Clean Air Act has no relevancy. While Staff believes that the conformity test has direct bearing on the Districts, it also recommends that the test of conformity appearing within the RCP must be modified to guarantee that the Districts (and other wastewater treatment agencies that undergo the conformity test) can proactively construct needed facilities to meet growth and regulatory demands while meeting a reasonable test of conformity with air quality management goals. Staff believes that SCAG maybe capable of making conformity analyses of the Districts ' long-term, master-planning efforts. However, SCAG's determination may or may not have any direct bearing on the Districts' success in receiving a federal determination of conformity. Why is this? Because any federal agency, including EPA, must make its own determination, according to EPA's Final Rule for Determining Conformity, published November 30, 1993 . The rule requires that any federal agency taking action on a project, permit or grant must make its own finding of conformity regarding its contemplated action. But, the Final Rule also requires the federal agency to consider comments from any interested parties and may choose to adopt the analysis of another federal agency. SCAG making conformity findings is somewhat of a "crap shoot. " On one hand, SCAG's efforts to make a finding of conformity may muddy the waters because it may be contradictory or redundant to EPA's efforts to make its own finding. On the other hand, a favorable finding by SCAG regarding the Districts' conformity with the air quality management plan may be helpful in predisposing EPA to also make a positive finding. Quite frankly, over the long haul, Districts' staff have found SCAG more accessible and open to discussion and compromise than we have found EPA staff to be. The following paragraphs support the staff analysis. Suggested language changes for inclusion within the RCP follow the review section of this Staff Report. REVIEW OF THE RCP WATER QUALITY ELEMENT The Water Quality Element, appearing as Chapter 11 of the Regional Comprehensive Plan, for the SCAG region: • outlines current water quality goals, • describes our existing water resources and quality, • describes who is now responsible for managing water 4 quality, • outlines existing and emerging issues affecting water quality management, • recommends policy options; and, • relates water quality issues to other regional issues. Within the chapter, it is stated that; "The water quality chapter is not intended to be a prescriptive plan for addressing water quality issues in the region. many public agencies in the region have responsibility for planning and maintaining the quality of the region's water. Instead, the chapter is intended to provide a regional perspective on current water quality issues and the plans and programs for addressing these issues, and to better clarify the relationship between water quality and other regional concerns. '- The chapter points out that water quality decision-making is complicated by the numerous federal, state and local governmental entities and private stakeholders that have vested responsibilities and interests in how water quality is managed. Incidentally, by last count of the Districts' staff, in the Santa Ana River watershed alone, there are 36 wastewater facilities, 2, 000 miscellaneous permittees, 3 counties, over 50 cities, 4 state agencies, 7 federal agencies and countless stakeholders such as agriculture, land development, environmental organizations, mining, flood control and water supply. Currently, there is no effective coordination of the efforts of these parties. However, the Water Quality Element describes a decision-making approach that Districts' staff have promoted on the regional, state and federal policy scene for over 15 years: use a collaborative bottoms-up process that provides site- specific solutions to actual conditions. This is at the heart of the Districts' successful operation under Section 301(h) of the federal Clean Water Act that allows us to safely discharge high quality, but less-than-full-secondary-treated wastewater to the deep, well-mixed and highly assimilative waters of coastal orange County. For these reasons, the Districts' staff endorses the general concept of streamlining regulations and placing local government in a co-equal role with federal and state government in watershed management decision-making. The Water Quality chapter relates how the SCAG region is expected to undergo continued population growth. In the entire SCAG region, this amounts to a population increase from the existing 14 million to 23 million (64%) by the year 2020. For the Districts' service area we projected a population increase from 1.98 million to 2.79 million (55%) from 1990 to 2020 in our 30- 5 year Facilities Master Plan. In 1988, SCAG' s population projections coincided with our projections and were quite helpful in supporting the basis for our facilities needs conclusions and programmatic EIR. The Water Quality chapter points out that increasingly stringent water quality requirements will continue to be a long-term reality. New requirements will not only continue to address wastewater treatment plants (on which the Clean Water Act has focused for the last 20 years) , but on urban and agricultural polluted runoff as well. These new requirements will exert financial and coordination demands on a wider number of governmental and private entities. For this reason, it is imperative that regionally-based conditions be incorporated into all future water quality decisions. The Water Quality chapter supports this point-of-view. Pacing Wastewater Facilities Construction with Population Proiections. With this background, the Water Quality Element chapter discusses watershed planning and management as the logical framework for appropriate decision-making. Watershed planning implies the use of a holistic approach to setting priorities and prudently expending limited public and private resources. Stakeholders within a watershed jointly determine the problems within a watershed and establish a game plan. Because all levels of government work together in a cooperative fashion, the existing level of overlap, duplication and bureaucratic gridlock can be minimized. There is one issue that the chapter discusses that is of special interest to the Districts. The chapter recommends that wastewater treatment agency facility planning and facility development be consistent with population projections contained in the Regional Comprehensive Plan. This is consistent with EPA's Final Rule for Determining Conformity, published November 30, 1993, which states in 51.858 (a) (5) (v) that: "An action. . .required to have a conformity determination. . .for ozone or nitrogen dioxide. . .will be determined to conform to the applicable SIP if. . .the action involves regional water and/or wastewater projects, (and) such projects are sized to meet only the needs of population projections that are in the applicable SIP. " On one hand, this ensures that future wastewater capacity is adequate to serve the increasing population expected within our region. There is little disagreement with this objective; and, in fact, it is the basis on which our 1989 Facilities Master Plan was based. Districts' staff found that our population projections matched those of SLAG. 6 On the other hand, SCAG asserts: that consistency between wastewater capacity and population projections helps to ensure that "increases in capacity do not unnecessarily out pace projections of future population and development. Capacity expansions may serve as an inducement to development and growth in a manner that is contrary to the region's air quality goal. " Because EPA's Final Rule, Section 51.859 obligates all federal agencies to make analyses of conformity based on: " . . .planning assumptions must be derived from the estimates of population, employment, travel, and congestion most recently approved by the MPO. . . " (our MPO is SCAG) , it is vital that SCAG is sensitive to our point of view and explicitly states its objective to support our proactive wastewater treatment facilities planning and construction efforts. It is for this reason that we must maintain close consultation with SCAG as the RCP evolves. It is difficult to imagine any legitimate reasons for opposing proactive wastewater facility construction. First, the mere presence of wastewater treatment capacity by itself is an insufficient inducement for development to significantly shift from what would otherwise occur. Development requires the entire range of infrastructure to proceed, water supply, of course, being one of the most significant. Second, no public wastewater agency is in the budgetary position to build a great deal of excess capacity. The wastewater treatment agencies in this region simply do not have the fiscal resources to construct unneeded facilities or facilities that anticipate service needs well into the future. Putting an impediment to so called "unneeded" facilities expansion is unnecessary and dangerous to the Districts' stated objective of proactively constructing needed wastewater treatment facilities and necessary reserve capacity to assure our ability to protect public health and the environment without interruption. SCAG's statement that "capacity expansions may serve as an inducement to development and growth" generates a concern that "excess" capacity is undesirable. This may prevent or restrain public wastewater treatment agencies like the Districts from doing the right thing. We, like many of our sister agencies, attempt to construct new facilities economically and with forward vision. When the market is right or when the economy of scale is helpful, we sometimes build facilities at a somewhat accelerated schedule. For the sake of long-term reliability (we must continuously operate 24-hours per day, 365 days-per-year or we haven't 7 successfully done our jobs) we use conservative design criteria and build facilities to withstand unforeseen storm events and unanticipated flow demand. Because it is nearly always more economical and straightforward to build one large plant addition than it is to build two or more small additions, we tend to see our treatment capacity "saw- tooth" upward while population increases as a smooth upward slope. For this reason, depending upon the timing, we may appear to have an unneeded amount of capacity when all we are doing is anticipating what we know will be needed. As another example, it makes no sense to tear up the community by building a sewer with limited future capacity and then have to come back a few years later and parallel it. Also, when we anticipate a new regulatory mandate, we sometimes proactively design, construct and start-up the necessary facilities so that we remain consistently in compliance. Finally, we must have adequate reserve capacity to allow for system maintenance and repairs. In the last few years we have sometimes witnessed regulatory agencies viewing us as "the bad guys" for wanting to construct essential public services. What an irony! Twenty-two years ago, as the federal Clean Water Act was enacted, the Nation embarked on an ambitious program to spend over $100 billion of federal, state and local government funds to upgrade moderate wastewater treatment infrastructure. We were digging out of a collective hole from which we have only recently emerged as a nation of individual communities. With this experience still fresh in our minds, no thinking wastewater treatment professional or local government official wants to compromise public health and the environment. But the future can only be assured by remaining proactive and responsible in our long-range facilities planning and construction efforts. This is a practice that the Districts' Boards and staff have supported in word and deed for over 20 years. It's a standard that our public insists on. It is why we are a national leader in wastewater management. When the responsibility of a wastewater treatment agency for achieving the region-s air quality objectives is discussed, there is a reality that is often overlooked. The reality is that many wastewater treatment agencies have absolutely no authority regarding land-use decisions within the communities they serve. Fortunately, it appears that EPA is now listening. in EPA's Final Rule for Determining Conformity response to comments, it is stated on page 63220 that: "It is unlikely, however, that Congress intended federal agencies to be responsible for emissions that are not practicably under their control. . .EPA does not believe that it is reasonable to conclude that a federal agency 'supports' an activity by third persons over whom the agency has no practical control. . .based on the mere fact that, if 8 one inspects the 'causal ' chain of events, the activity or emissions can be described as being a 'reasonably foreseeable' result of the agency's action. " Districts' staff believe that this can be interpreted to apply also to the wastewater agency for which the conformity criteria are being applied. Many wastewater agencies have no land-use planning authority. This is true for agencies such as the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County, the Chino Basin Municipal Water District (providing wastewater services to western San Bernardino County) , Eastern Municipal Water District (providing wastewater services to central Riverside County) , and the Ventura Regional Sanitation District. There are other examples as well. Every county within the SCAG region has at least one major wastewater treatment agency whose governing board has absolutely no responsibility for local land-use decisions. Therefore, to hold wastewater treatment facility construction as a "hostage" for the sake of achieving air quality goals is not only obviously contrary to water quality goals; but is, in fact, an ineffective strategy and contradictory to EPA's own conclusion as outlined above. It could seriously impair water quality improvement efforts. For this reason, SCAG, or any other governmental body, can not ask wastewater treatment agencies to do what they can not do. Comprehensive Watershed Management. Regarding the issue of comprehensive watershed management, Districts' staff is able to report that the administrative branch of the federal government now supports our long-held belief that holistic, site-specific, decision-making is the most effective way to address water quality problems. In "President Clinton's Clean water Initiative, January 31, 199411, it is stated that: "An updated Clean Water Act can tackle these problems through a new, more targeted approach. Through "designer partnerships" among Federal, State and local governments, private landowners, industry and the public, we can craft flexible, innovative, efficient solutions to water quality problems, increasingly making watersheds the basis of analysis and action. . . " Districts' staff support this new paradigm and believe that it is complemented by the Water Quality Element. The Ouestion of Federal Mandate. Regarding the issue of federally-mandated regional water quality planning, SCAG staff asserts that the Water Quality Element is mandated by Section 208 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Section 176 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) . SCAG staff argues that Section 208 of the CWA requires 9 that area-wide waste treatment management planning be conducted by new or existing regional agencies and that the plan be updated regularly to insure that it remains relevant and targeted. They also argue that Section 176 of the CAA requires that all federal agencies that permit, fund or authorize projects or activities must have an affirmative finding of conformity with the approved air quality management plan for the region. CWA Section 208 Planning. While it is true that Section 208 of the CWA mandates area-wide waste treatment management, in point of fact, this region's wastewater treatment planning and construction efforts have occurred at the sole initiative of each of the dozens of wastewater treatment agencies in our region with little or no coordination on a regional scale. The region's last wastewater treatment plan (often referred to as a 208 Plan) was completed in 1979. This has not been a significant barrier to effective wastewater problem solving--yet. We all do our own facilities master planning and have been relatively successful in meeting rising wastewater treatment and sewer capacity demands. In the case of the Districts, for instance, our system is largely independent of our neighboring sister agencies. By consulting with the Orange County cities we serve, we can effectively plan our facilities. Where we have an ongoing and direct infrastructure tie-in with a neighboring agency (in the cases, for instance, of Irvine Ranch Water District and the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority) , the staffs and boards of the agencies have crafted cooperative agreements to address the common needs of the agencies. In the future, a more coordinated regional approach will be desirable. While each of the existing wastewater agencies must have lead responsibility for making facilities planning and construction decisions, it is quite likely that better coordination will be necessary. New water quality regulatory initiatives by the state and the federal government will demand it. Regional approaches to groundwater renewal projects and the use of reclaimed water will improve our ability to coordinate this work. Changes to the Clean Water Act will undoubtedly contain funding and flexibility features that will serve as incentives for conducting comprehensive watershed management. For these reasons comprehensive watershed management or regional water quality management envisioned in Section 208 of the 1972 CWA (and its subsequent reauthorizations) have the potential to finally bring site-specific decision-making to water quality problem-solving. In the long run, this will also prove to be the most cost-effective approach to solving water quality problems. Unfortunately, because of the way Section 208 was administered in the past, successful regional water quality planning failed to occur in most areas of the country, including ours. The 208 Planning process failed here because federal clean water grants 10 and rapidly evolving federal command-and-control mandates quickly overran local government's ability to work regionally. We were all forced to plan on our own. In addition, there was a feeding frenzy over the federal funds offered to construct facilities. Competition and limited time windows erased any hope of cooperation between agencies competing for the same funds. Because federal and state permitting and enforcement initiatives were directed on individual wastewater treatment agencies using an end-of-pipe focus, there was no incentive or interest in a holistic approach to water quality management decision-making. Many of the 208 Plans were created without sufficient input from the agencies that were most affected by them: the wastewater treatment agencies. It was no wonder there was limited buy-in to the 208 plans and their intended purpose, holistic planning. Nevertheless, in the future, a bottoms-up approach, which now appears to be advocated by many at the federal, regional and local levels, needs to occur. The 208 Planning process or a close cousin to it, with SCAG taking the role of the regional coordinator and information clearinghouse, could help to facilitate this goal, if local government and the wastewater treatment agencies are given the primary role of developing programs and strategies. This is, in fact, what SCAG recommends in the Water Quality chapter. CAA Section 176. The second federal-mandate that SCAG points to as a reason for believing that the Water Quality Element is mandated is Section 176 of the Clean Air Act. Section 176(c) states that: "No department, agency, or instrumentality of the Federal Government shall engage in, support in any way or provide financial assistance for, license or permit, or approve, any activity which does not conform to an implementation plan. . (for achieving the requirements of the Clean Air Act) . . .No metropolitan planning organization designated under section 134 of title 23 of the USC shall give its approval to any project, program, or plan which does not conform to an implementation plan approved or promulgated. . (in support of achieving the requirements of the Clean Air Act) . " For the Districts, federal approval is necessary for our ocean discharge permit because it is jointly issued by the Environmental Protection Agency and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. This places the Districts under the conformity requirement of the CAA and the region's air quality compliance plan. Districts' staff believe that the conformity process suggested by SCAG in the Water Quality chapter, (which, incidentally is simply a restatement of the wastewater conformity criteria now existing in the 1991 SIP) , is reasonable, except for 11 the one issue of concern discussed above (pacing wastewater facilities construction with population projections) . There are two tests of conformity: 1. Wastewater treatment facilities must be sized and service-phased according to the population projections for the service area adopted or approved by SCAG. 2 . The wastewater treatment agency must have a monitoring and reporting system for projects within the service area for sharing information with other regional and local agencies, and for reporting information to SCAG. As the Water Quality chapter points out, there is a complication to these conformity criteria. The Environmental Protection Agency has developed regulations for conformity to implement Section 176 of the CAA. Final Rule-making was issued in November 1993 that obligates wastewater treatment plants subject to federal approval, permits or grants to be in conformity with the air quality management plan of the region (known as the State Implementation Plan, or SIP) . In the absence of completely escaping conformity requirements altogether, the Water Quality Element chapter takes a reasonable approach to this requirement, if the language of test #1 is modified to recognize the desirability of proactive and cost- effective wastewater treatment facility planning, design and construction. SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGING THE SCAG RCP WATER QUALITY CHAPTER LANGUAGE Districts' staff have specifically recommended changes to the December 1993 draft version of Chapter 11 of the Regional Comprehensive Plan. Suggested additions are in bold. Suggested (deletions] are in brackets. Starting at Page 11-19, 2nd paragraph: 8. Wastewater treatment agency facility planning and facility development should be consistent with population projections contained in the RCP, while taking into account the need to build wastewater treatment facilities in cost- effective increments of capacity, the need to build well enough in advance to reliably meet unanticipated service and stormwater demands, and the need to provide standby capacity for public safety and environmental protection objectives. 12 Starting at Page 11-19, 4th paragraph: Second, consistency between wastewater capacity expansion and population projections helps ensure that increases in capacity [do not unnecessarily out pace projections of future population and development. Capacity expansions may serve as an inducement to development and growth in a manner that is contrary to region's air quality goals. ] for those projects and facilities subject to federal approval are in positive conformity with the region's applicable air quality management plan. [EPA recognized] Congress requires this in the federal Clean Air Act. Section 316 of the Act gives EPA the authority to withhold grants for sewage treatment works construction if such construction does not conform with the region's air quality plan. In addition, Section 176 of the Act prohibits any federal agency from providing financial assistance, licensing, permitting or approving any activity that does not conform with a region's air plan. [This section also prohibits a metropolitan planning agency, such as SCAG, from granting approval of a project, program, or plan that does not conform to the air plan. ] However, if this is so interpreted to interfere with a public wastewater treatment agency subject to federal conformity requirements ability to conduct its master planning efforts to proactively build needed facilities, then this becomes a classic example of contradictory public policy. While it is certainly important to meet air quality objectives in this region, it is equally important that wastewater treatment agencies meet their objectives of protecting public health and the environment. This can only be done by proactively constructing the facilities necessary to meet the objectives of the Clean Water Act, a 208 Plan, a comprehensive watershed management plan or the stated policy objectives of a public wastewater treatment agency. For this reason, it is the stated policy of SCAG to encourage and support those wastewater facilities planning and construction efforts that are intended to proactively address service, reliability, environmental and cost- effectiveness demands. Starting at Page 11-20: 1 . Upon issuance of the final RCP, SCAG, after consultation with wastewater treatment agencies in the region, will modify (if necessary) and then [allocate] adjust up or down the growth projections contained in the growth management component of the RCP by the service area of each wastewater treatment agency in the SCAG region. 13 4 . (F) acility plans adopted by the governing board of a wastewater treatment agency found to be consistent with the SLAG-adopted population projections will be incorporated into the water quality component of the regional comprehensive plan. For those facility plans adopted by the governing board of a wastewater treatment agency that are apparently inconsistent with the SCAG-adopted population projects, SCAG will consult with the wastewater treatment agency to reconcile the inconsistency to the satisfaction of the governing board of the wastewater treatment agency. If reconciliation fails to occur, then the existence of the wastewater facility plan will be noted within an amendment to the SCAG-adopted population projections and the two contradictory positions will be described within the water quality component of the regional comprehensive plan. 5. Conformity determinations for specific facilities subject to the conformity provisions of Section 176 of the CAA will not be necessary if the specific facilities are constructed in accordance with a facility plan that has been found to be consistent with the SCAG-adopted population projections of the water quality component of the regional comprehensive plan. For specific facilities subject to the conformity provisions of Section 176 of the CAA and not constructed in accordance with such a facilities plan, conformity determinations will be conducted consistent with the ( 1991 conformity guidelines. ] the most recent adopted conformity guidelines. SCAG will evaluate these guidelines to reflect the most recent regulations adopted by the Environmental Protection Agency regarding conformity, and the changes to the State Implementation Plan that follow. The ( 1991] SCAG guidelines will , in cooperation with wastewater treatment agencies, be revised accordingly by SCAG. In any case, SCAG will take a balanced view of wastewater treatment facilities planning and construction by recognizing that competing with any federal, state or regional mandates for achieving clean air objectives are the equally important federal, state, regional and local mandates to achieve clean water objectives and to meet the long-term service demands of the community served by wastewater treatment facilities. 14 FUTURE ACTIONS BY DISTRICTS' STAFF Districts' staff will continue to monitor the progress on the completion of the Regional Comprehensive Plan and will maintain close consultation with the local and county government staff here in Orange County as well as the staff of our sister wastewater treatment agencies in the SCAG region. Staff will report to the Executive Committee when new drafts of the RCP are created by SCAG staff. BPA:ahh REF regcomp Attachment 15 FILE UUFY DRAFT REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN December 1993 Stan draft reWased rcr public review prior to coruitlerolion for oc7ion by SLAG Regional Council. nmwcnwouu�pOC1�11011p�MMt.IN WATER QUALITY • Introduction • Purpose of the Water Quality Chapter • Current Water Quality Goals and Objectives Under Existing Federal and State Law • Water Resources in the SCAG Region • Water Quality in the SCAG Region • Current Framework for Water Quality Planning and Management • Regional Issues for Improved Water Quality Planning and Management • Recommendations and Policy Options • Integration of Water Quality and Other Regional Issues A. INTRODUCTION While providing an adequate supply of water has long been one of the primary challenges facing the region, maintaining the quality of the water in the region has become an increasingly important issue. Water serves many functions in the region. It is used by households for drinking and other purposes; it is relied upon by turners to irrigate crops; it is critical to commercial and industrial operations. It also provides important recreational benefits, for activities such as swimming, fishing, surfing and sailing. Aesthetically, Southern California's rivers, streams, lakes, and oceans are an integral pan of the natural landscape that has long drawn people to the region. Maintaining clean water is an important goal for the future success of Southern California. Yet, the historical growth and urbanization in the SCAG region has often adversely affected water resources. More people have Chapter Eleven • Water Quality meant more sewage, and increased amounts of wastewater discharged into our water bodies. Urbanization has altered many of the natural filtration systems that maintain the quality of the water and has increased the amount of runoff pollution. Past industrial practices have left major underground aquifers unusable; aquifers that are relied upon by millions of residents for their drinking water. Recent years, however, have resulted in many changes leading to improved water quality. With the assistance of federal funding, wastewater treatment has drastically improved during the past 15 years. New hazardous waste management practices have significantly reduced the likelihood that current industrial practices will contaminate groundwater supplies. Also, there is a growing awareness and scientific understanding of the relationship among water quality, the surrounding habitat, and land use. While the successes are noteworthy, new challenges still remain in the region. These issues include addressing and financing the control of non-point source pollution, such as stormwater runoff; paying for the cleanup of contaminated groundwater basins; and balancing the costs of water pollution control with other regional objectives. 71is chapter examines these and other issues. Under Section 209 of the Clean Water Act, SCAG is the designated agency responsible for developing a Waste Treatment Management Plan for the region. The 208 plan is designed to provide a comprehensive planning framework for both point and nonpoint source water pollution. Specific planning requirements include, but are not limited to, identifying needed treatment works to meet anticipated needs over a 20 year period, the identification of contruction priorities for the region, procedures and methods to control nonpoint source pollution from agriculture, mining and other sources. SCAG prepared the Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan in 1979 and made amendments to the plan in 1981. This chapter, while not a comprehensive update to the 208 plan, addresses similar issues, including a regional framework for the expansion of wastewater treatment capacity. B. PURPOSE OF THE WATER QUALITY CHAPTER The water quality chapter is not intended to be a prescriptive plan for addressing water quality issues in the region. Many public agencies in the region have responsibility for planning for and maintaining the quality of the region's water. Instead, the chapter is intended to provide a regional perspective on current water quality issues and the plans and programs for addressing these issues, and to better clarify the relationship between water quality and other regional concerns. Accordingly, the chapter is intended to accomplish the following: • Identify the current water quality goals and objectives for the region as established under existing law. • Provide an inventory of current water quality problem areas in the region. • Identify and describe the various plans and programs affecting water quality in Southern California. • Raise some regional issues associated with maintaining and improving water quality in the region including issues in which water quality goals and policies interact with other regional goals and policies. • Provide a framework for ensuring that growth in wastewater treatment capacity is consistent with regional growth projections. Page 11-2 0 December, 1993 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan Chapter Eleven • Water Quality • Provide recommendations and policy options for improving the region's water quality and the current system for managing water quality. C. CURRENT WATER QUALITY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES UNDER EXISTING FEDERAL AND STATE LAW Both the federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly referred to as the 'Clean Water Act') and the state law on water quality (the Poner-Cologne Water Quality Act) establish goals and objectives for water quality. These two laws provide much of the legal basis for clean water programs in the region and, therefore, the goals and objectives established in these laws guide most of the region's clean water programs. 1 . GOALS The Clean Water Act was initially passed in 1972 and has been amended several time thereafter. The law creates several regulatory requirements and programs and provides grants to state and local governments to finance clean water projects. The primary goal of the Clean Water Act is the following: • To restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the nation's water.' The,central state law governing water quality is the Poner-Cologne Water Quality Act. The Act was passed in 1970 and established the State Water Resources Control Board and the various Regional Water Quality Control Boards, the primary state agencies responsible for maintaining water quality. The goal of the State and Regional Boards under the Porter-Cologne Act can be summarized as follows: • To achieve and maintain water quality objectives that are necessary to protect all beneficial uses of all waters. 2. OBJECTIVES The specific objectives for water quality in the region under current law are identified in the various Regional Water Quality Control Board Basin Plans. These plans, which are described in more detail below, provide specific objectives for various water bodies. These objectives are the limits or levels of water quality constituents or characteristics established for the protection of beneficial uses. Beneficial uses include the various current or potential uses of a waterbody, including, but not limited to domestic use, agricultural and industrial supply, power generation, recreation, aesthetic navigation, and preservation and enhancement of fish, wildlife, or other quality resources. Each waterbody may have a different set of beneficial uses and, therefore, different water quality objectives. A summary of the water quality objectives for waterbodies in the SCAG region as contained in the Regional Basin Plaru is included in the background document for the Water Quality chapter. 'See Federal Water Pollution Control Act. I 101 M. SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 0 Page 11-3 Chapter Eleven a Water Quality D. WATER RESOURCES IN THE SCAG REGION Despite the perception that the Southern California region has little of its own water, the area includes a wide array of rivers, lakes, streams, groundwater basins and, of course, oceans. The major surface water features of the region are identified in the map in Figure 1I-1. The water resources in the region include the following. 1 . SURFACE WATER Surface water refers to the system of lakes, rivers, streams, and creeks in the region. These systems can be divided into hydrologic basins, or integrated systems that drain a specific area. Many of the surface water systems in the region have been developed into a series of dams, flood control channels, and spreading grounds. Hence, only a portion of the natural runoff actually flows through these river systems to the ocean. In several riven, discharges from wastewater treatment punts may provide the majority of water flow during the dry season. The Santa Clara River Basin includes the Ventura and Santa Clara rivers. The Ventura River has Marilljo Lake and Lake Caritas on its tributaries. The main channel of the Santa Clara River has no lakes or reservoirs, although two of the Santa Clm's tributaries, Carfaic and Pint have been dammed. Lake Hughes, Munz Lake, and Eirabeth late have been created by the San Andreas Fault. Elizabeth Lake drains into Castaic Lake. Another tributary of the Santa Clara, Piru Creek, flows into both Pyramid Lake and Lake Piru. Sespe Creek also drains a considerable area. The Los Angeles River and the San Gabriel River are considered to be one hydrologic basin. The headwaters of the San Gabriel River and tributaries of the Los Angeles River rise in the San Gabriel Mountains. Prior to extensive urbanization during this century, these two rivers descended to a low-lying area of extensive wetlands before flowing into the ocean. Open bodies of water within the basin are nearly all dammed reservoirs. The Cogswell Reservoir, Morris Reservoir along with the San Gabriel Reservoir in San Gabriel Canyon control and retain much of the runoff from the San Gabriel River before it exits the canyon and the Santa Fe Dam and Whittier Narrows provide flood control further down the river. The Rio Hondo connects the San Gabriel River from the Whittier Narrows Dam. Reservoirs, such as Chatsworth, Los Angeles, Pacoima, Stone Canyon, Franklin, Hollywood, and Puddingsmne, are important both for storage and for recreation, but are not extensive in area. Separate from the Los Angeles and San Gabriel drainage systems, Malibu Creek drains a significant portion of the Santa Monica Mountains. The Santa Am River drainage can be divided into an upper basin and a lower basin. The drainage of upper reaches of the Santa Ana is retained by Big Bear Valley Dam. The Santa Ana and Md! Creek, have carved very steep canyons and exit the mountains into the Bunker Hill basin. Cajon Creek and Lyde Creek also charge this basin. Silvemood late is a terminus of the California Aqueduct. This water is channeled through an eight-mile.tumel to provide a source of hydroelectric power to Devil's Canyon power plant, and then is piped to lake Perris. Page 11-4 0 December, 1993 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan Chapter Eleven • Water Quality 1L� 4.1 5 J bbff r Ih , il! f J l off d , . ff fl, O d SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 0 Page 11-5 Chapter Eleven • Water Quality The middle reaches of the Santa Ana River are perennial only because of waste treatment plant effluent. All the drainage of the Eastern San Gabriel Mountains - San Antonio Creek, Day's Creek, Etiwanda Creek, Deer Creek and Cucamonga Creek - are modified as storm drains and channeled to the El Prado Dam. lake Matthews and Lake Perris provide storage for Colorado River water and State Water Project water, respectively. lake Elsinore and Railroad Canyon Reservoir are other surface bodies of water within this basin. Lower Basin drainage is dominated by the flood control dam at El Prado. The Santa Ana Canyon, which separates the Chino Hills from the Santa Ana Mountains is the major drainage of heavily urbanized Orange County. The lower Santa Ana has been channelized and modified so that in most years flows do not reach the sea, but are used to recharge groundwater. Small portions of wetlands still remain in Orange County, Bolsa Chia, and the Upper Newport Bay area. The Mojave River rises in the San Bernardino Mountains and flows north and then eastward to the Mojave Sink. The Mojave River is very important to the growing High Desert communities as it is the only reliable source of ground water. lake Arrowhead is a reservoir on one of the Mojave River tributaries. Whilewater River drains the eastern flanks of the San Gorgonio and collects drainage from the San Jacinto mountains. The Canyons of the Anza-Borrego State Park contain seeps and springs. The Whitewater River becomes the main drainage of the Coachella Valley to the Salton Sea, a large saline body of water. The Salton Sea was created by severe flooding that poured Colorado River waters into the below sea-level depression for almost two years (1905-07). The Salton Sea also receives drainage from the New River, which crosses the border from Mexico. Finally, on the eastern border of the SCAG region runs the Colorado River, which supplies a significant amount of agricultural and drinking water to the region. 2. GROUNDWATER The SCAG region contains many large groundwater basins. Prior to the development of the Los Angeles Aqueduct, groundwater served as the primary source of potable water. Even with the development of imported water supplies, groundwater continues to provide a significant portion of the region's water. Major groundwater basins in the region include the Central, Raymond, San Fernando, Central, West Coast and San Gabriel in Los Angeles County; the Upper Santa Ana Valley Basin system including Bunker Hill, and China Basins in San Bernardino and Riverside counties; the Coastal Plain Basin in Orange County; the Coachella Volley Basin in Riverside County; and the Oxnard Plain Basin in Ventura County. 3. OCEANS AND ESTUARIES Perhaps Southern California's most important natural attribute is the Pacific Ocean. The coastline of the SCAG region contains many unique bays, harbors, and estuaries. Starting from the north, these include the estuary at the mouth of the Santa Clara River where wastewater flows maintain a wetland/estuary environment. Further south, lies the Santa Monica Bay, the largest indentation on the Southern California coastline. The Bay extends north from Point Dume above Malibu to the Palos Verdes Peninsula in the South. Within the Santa Monica Bay is Marina Del Rey, a large man-made recreational marina. The marina lies adjacent to Balloua Creek, a channelized waterway that receives a significant amount of the urban runoff Pace 11-6 0 December, 1993 SCAG • Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan Chapter Eleven • Water Quality draining directly into the Santa Monica Bay. Further south in the Bay is Ring Harbor in Redondo Beach, another recreational marina. On the southern side of the Palos Verdes Peninsula lies the Los Angeles and Long Beach harbors, two of the busiest commercial harbors in the world. The Los Angeles River, which carries the majority of Los Angeles County's urban runoff, as well as wastewater flows from inland treatment plants, flows into the ocean at this point. Further south is Newport Bay, which is an enclosed estuary with extensive development in and around the Bay. 4. WETLANDS Wetlands are unique areas in which the water table is essentially at the same level as the land. Wetlands include marshes, swamps, bogs, and playa lakes. In recent years, the environmental importance of wetlands have become better known. Wetlands provide habitat for a large number of plants and species and also serve as natural filters, cleansing water of many pollutants. In addition, wetlands function as natural flood control systems, absorbing much of the overflow water from rivers and streams. The SCAG region, particularly the coastal plains, were once home to vast acreage of wetlands. Today, estimates indicate that in some areas, more than 90 percent of the wetlands have been lost. However, wetland areas still exist around Ballona Creek in Los Angeles, in coastal areas of undeveloped portions of Orange County and in other areas in the region. 5. IMPORTED WATER Imported water is used throughout the region for drinking, agricultural, and industrial purposes. It also provides water for groundwater recharge and for recreational uses. Imported water in Southern California comes from three sources: the Stare Rater Project, which carries water from the Sacramento Bay Delta area, the Colorado River Aqueduct, and the Las Angeles Aqueduct, which imports water from the Owens Valley and Mono Basin. In addition, new federal legislation will allow the region greater access to water from another source, the Central Valley Project. A detailed discussion of these imported sources is provided in the Water Resources chapter. E. WATER QUALITY IN THE SCAG REGION How is the quality of the water in the SCAG region? The most direct source for answering this question is the State Water Quality Assessment (SWQA) Report. The SWQA Report is a compilation of Regional Quality Assessment Reports that are adopted first by each regional water quality control board. The report is prepared every 2 years and it used to satisfy various federal reporting requirements under the Clean Water Act. The report is generated from a Water Quality Assessment Database which is maintained at the Regional Board and is updated as new information is available. This report provides a general assessment of the quality of waterbodies in the State. The SWQA classifies each waterbody into one of three categories: • Good-Quality Water, SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 • Page 11-7 Chapter Eleven • Water Quality • Intermediate-Quality Water, and • Impaired-Quality Water. A fourth classification of Unknown-Quality Water is used when observations are not available. Each waterbody is also identified by its type, including estuaries, groundwater, lakes and reservoirs, oceans and open bays, rivers and streams, saline lakes, and wetlands. All these waterbody types exist in the SCAG region and a significant number of them have been identified as having Impaired-Water-Quality. The summary tables for the SWQA for waterbodies in the SCAG region are included as an appendix to the Background Document. Major waterbodies identified as impaired include the following: 1 . RIVERS AND STREAMS Major rivers in the region include the Santa Clara River, Los Angeles River, San Gabriel River, Santa Ana River, Mojave River, Whitewater River, New River, and the Colorado River. Some of these rivers are intermittent (i.e., they are dry for parts of the year) and many parts of them have been channelized for flood prevention purposes, particularly around urban areas. The Colorado River, which borders the Southeastern portion of the region, is a major source of drinking and irrigation supply water for Southern California. Much of the water that flows through some of these rivers (particularly those in the urbanized areas) is effluent from wastewater treatment plants. Over the course of a river or stream, various inputs from either point (e.g., wastewater or industrial facilities) or from non-point (agricultural or stormwater runoff) can change the quality of the water in the river. Thus, most of the rivers contain reaches with water quality characteristics ranging from good through intermediate to impaired. Of particular concern in the region is the New River, which suffers from significant contamination from poorly treated wastewater and industrial discharges from Mexico. 2. LAKES The region's largest inland waterbody, the Salton Sea, has significant water quality problems. The Sea is essentially a man-made waterbody, supported by inflows from agricultural return flows. The Sea lacks an outlet and the water level is maintained through evaporation. This evaporation leaves behind salts and, thus, the salinity in the sea is constantly increasing, which impacts both fish and riparian habitat. In addition, toxic contamination is a concern in the Sea, due in large part to discharges from Mexican facilities into the New River. In addition, recently implemented conservation practices may reduce the amount of fresh water that flows to, and sustains the Salton Sea. 3. OPEN OCEANS AND BAYS Santa Monica Bay, which extends from Malibu to the Palos Verdes Peninsula, has impaired water quality as the result of several sources. Past wastewater disposal practices included the dumping of large amounts of PCBs, DDTs, and heavy metals into the Bay, which have led to persistent contamination problems in sediments, biota, and seafood. The Bay continues to receive the majority of the region's effluent from wastewater treatment plants. In addition, stormwater pollution, which drains directly into the Bay, may be the major current source of pollution. Page 11-8 9 December, 1993 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan Chapter Eleven • Water Guality 4. GROUNDWATER Several of the major groundwater basins, relied upon by millions of residents and businesses for potable water, suffer from contamination from past industrial and agricultural practices and from problems due to overdraft. Contamination from common industrial organic solvents, including trichloreythlene(TCE), perchloroethylene (PCE), and from nitrates has been found in may of the major groundwater basins underlying Los Angeles County. Widespread contamination has been discovered in both the San Fernando Valley and San Gabriel Valley basins. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has declared both basins 'Superfund' sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response and Liability Act (CERCLA). Remediation work directed by EPA to extract and treat the contaminated water has begun in the San Fernando Valley. Remediation work has yet to begin in the San Gabriel Valley, although the San Gabriel Basin Water Quality Authority has developed a plan to provide a comprehensive, locally based, solution to the contamination problem. Other impaired groundwater basins include the Ventura City-Oxnard Plain Basin, which suffers from saltwater intrusion due to continued pumping; the Chino and Middle Santa Ana basins, which have been affected by agricultural and dairy practices; and the Mojave Basin, which has wide variations in the water table from excessive pumping and contamination from past waste disposal practices. 5. BAYS AND HARBORS The state's water quality assessment identifies several bays and harbors in the region with impaired water quality. These include Alamitos Bay, King Harbor, Long Beach Harbor, Los Angeles Harbor, Marina Del Rey, and Port Hueneme. A common problem with these bays and harbors includes heavy metal contamination of sediments. Impacts to biota is often significant in these bays and harbors, and has led to health advisories due to elevated levels of contamination in shellfish tissues. 6. ESTUARIES Estuaries include the area's tidal prisms and tidal wetlands. Those identified as impaired include Ballona Wetlands, Colorado Lagoon, Dominguez Channel Tidal Prism, Los Angeles River Tidal Prism, Malibu Lagoon, Mugu Lagoon, San Gabriel River Tidal Prism, Santa Clara River Estuary, and the Ventura River Estuary. These estuaries suffer from similar problems as the bays and harbors—clevated heavy metal levels—and also have potential problems with eutrophiution. In addition, significant alteration of wetlands from development has created habitat and species problems in areas such as the Ballona Wetlands. F. CURRENT FRAMEWORK FOR WATER QUALITY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Who is responsible for planning and managing water quality in Southern California? The answer to this question is not as simple as it might appear. Numerous federal, state, and local governmental entities in one way or another are vested with responsibilities that affect water quality. In addition, private businesses and organizations also have significant legal requirements to ensure that their activities do not adversely affect water quality. .cC4l; 0 Draft Raninnal Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 0 Page 11-9 Chapter Eleven o Water Quality One of the purposes of this water quality chapter is to identify the agencies with planning are management responsibilities for water quality in the region. The Background Document to this chapter provides a more detailed identification of the various responsible agencies as well as descriptions of their functions and responsibilities. The primary regional planning documents for water quality in the SCAG region are the basin plans prepared by the State Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs). Four such plans, which also include specific regulatory controls, cover most of the water resources in the SCAG region. The purpose and structure of these basin plans is described below. While these plans are important parts of the water planning and management process, they do not cover many of the planned activities in the region for improving water quality. Thus, this chapter identifies the additional major organizations, primarily public sector, that have water quality planning and management responsibilities within the SCAG region. The list of organizations contained in this document is not intended to be exhaustive. However, it provides an overview of the intricate and sometimes diffuse nature of water quality planning and management in the SCAG region. 1. REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD BASIN PLANS The primary planning documents for improving water quality in the SCAG region are prepared by the State Regional Water Quality Control Boards. There are nine RWQCBs throughout the State of California. Su of these boards overlap with the SCAG boundaries (see Figure 11-2). Of these six, almost all of the SCAG region is covered by four boards: the Los Angeles Region (No. 4), the Santa Ana Region (No. 8), the Lahontan Region (No. 6), and the Colorado River Basin Region (No. 7). In addition to the regional boards, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) is responsible for establishing statewide policy on water quality issues. Both the SWRCB and the regional boards are part of the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal-EPA). The regional boards have primary responsibility for implementing the state Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act, the major water quality legislation in California, and the CWA. Responsibilities under both of these acts include developing 'basin plan for the regions, which provide objectives for improving or maintaining water quality, and issuing water quality permits to dischargers. The Porter-Cologne Act divests each regional board to '... formulate and adopt water quality control plans for all areas within the region." There are three fundamental components in these plans: 1. Establishment of Beneficial Uses. In the basin plan, each regional board must identify the 'beneficial uses' of each water body. Beneficial uses are the various ways in which a water body may be used and include such activities as municipal and domestic water supply, agricultural supply, groundwater recharge, industrial supply, hydropower generation, wildlife and aquatic habitat, and recreational uses. 2. Establishment of Water Ouality Objectives Water quality objectives are the limits or levels of water constituents or characteristics established to protect beneficial uses. These objectives can either be 4Vatar Code 1113000-13999.1 S. Page 11-10 • December, 1993 SCAG • Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan 0 ngum 11.2 California Regional Water Control Boards in the SCAG Region ---------------------------- b � 6 1 o Lahontan Region N ; 4 ; Lo' Angeles �., ,Region _ - ------- - - - ."'^----.r'--- --------------------.---- anta Ana 7 a Ripgion Colorado _ m w - - - - -River Basin Region Q -------._. Chapter Eleven • Water Quality expressed in narrative or numerical form. In addition, the objectives can apply to all water bodies or types of water bodies in the region or to a specific water body. When combined with beneficial uses, water quality objectives establish the specific standards that must be met for a water body. 3. Implementation Plan The implementation plan describes the programs, projects, and other actions necessary to achieve the objectives established in the basin plan. The primary mechanism for implementing the point source portions of the basin plan is through issuing and enforcing waste discharge and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permits to entities discharging waste water to either the land or to a water body. In addition, the boards implement non-point source loan programs, issue NPDES permits for stormwater, and oversee groundwater remediation projects. Implementation measures for nonpoint source discharges are carried out in accordance with the state's 'Nonpoint Source Management Plan' as adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board in 1988. Basin plans are in effect for all four of the regional boards that cover most of the SCAG region. The Porter- Cologne Act requires regional boards to review and, if necessary, update these plans every three years (known as the 'triennial review'). Several of the plans in the SCAG region are in the process of being updated. The curtent status of the regional basin plans in covering the SCAG region are as follows: 1. Los Angeles Region, The Los Angeles Region develops basin plans for two areas: the Santa Clara River Basin and the Los Angeles River Basin. The plans for both of these basins were developed and adopted by the regional board in 1975. The L.A. Regional Board made some revisions to the plan in 1978, 1990, and 1991. A triennial review of the plan is currently underway that will result in more comprehensive changes to the 1975 plan. The updated plan is expected to be adopted in early 1994. 2. Santa Ana Region, The Santa Ana Region first adopted its plan in 1975 and then conducted a complete update of the plan in 1983. The Santa Ana Regional Board is in the process of updating the plan again and is expected to adopt a revised regional plan between late 1993 and early 1994. 3. Colorado River Region. The Colorado River Regional Board adopted its most recent basin plan in 19,91 and is working on an update to the plan to be released by the end of 1993. 4. Lahontan Region, The Lahontan Region adopted its basin plan in 1975 and has amended the plan several times since then. The Lahontan Board is currently undertaking a revision to the basin plan. 2. OTHER PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES Numerous other governmental agencies have planning and management responsibilities in the SCAG region. They include federal, state, regional, and local agencies that implement programs relating either directly or indirectly to maintaining water quality. These agencies and their responsibilities are identified in Figure 11-3. The specific responsibilities and activities are described in more detail in the background document for this chapter. Page 11-12 • December, 1993 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan Chapter Eleven • Water Quality Figure 11-3 3 Partial List of Agencies with Water Quality Planning and Management Responsibilities in the SCAG Region A. Federal Agencies 1. Environmental Protection Agency 2. Army Corp of Engineers 3. Department of the Interior a. Bureau of Reclamation b. U.S-Fish and Wildlife Service c. National Park Service d. Bureau of land Management d- U.S. Geological Survey C U.S. Forest Service 4. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 5. U.S. Coast Guard 6. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service B. State Agencies 1. California Environmental Protection Agency a. State Water Resources Control Board b. Regional Water Quality Control Boards e. Department of Toxic Substances Control it. Department of Pesticide Regulation e. Integrated Waste Management Board crn r- e n.a fr Rpoional Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 0 Page 11-13 Chapter Eleven • Water Quality Figure 11-3 (continued) d Partial List of Agencies with Water Quality Planning and Management Responsibilities in the SCAG Region (continued) B. State Agencies (Cont'd) 2. California Resources Agency a. Department of Water Resources b. Department of Fish and Game c. California Coastal Commission it. State Coastal Conservancy e. Colorado River Board of California 3. Department of Health Services, Office of Drinking Water C. Regional and Local Agenda 1. City and County General Purpose Governments 2. Comprehensive Regional Planning Organizations 3. Single Purpose Agencies a. Wastewater Treatment Agencies b. Water Supply Agencies (1) Metropolitan Water District (2) Wholesale Water Suppliers Outside of MWD Service Area (3) Retall Water Agencies c. Flood Control Districts d. Irrigation Districts e. Resource Conservation Districts f. Water Replenishment Districts g. Water Masters h. Others (1) San Gabriel Basin Water Quality Authority (2) Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority - (3) Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project. (4) Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Page 11-14 • December, 1993 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan Chapter Eleven • Water Quality G. REGIONAL ISSUES FOR IMPROVED WATER QUALITY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Numerous important issues face the region as it strives to maintain and improve its water quality. This chapter of the RCP identifies and discusses several of these issues. They include: 1 . Implications of Continued Growth in the South Coast Region The SCAG region has experienced population and urban growth throughout the past quarter-century unparalleled anywhere in the United States. Projections indicate that growth is likely to continue throughout the next 15 to 20 years. This growth presents several water quality problems. It creates an increased demand for wastewater treatment services as additional development and additional residents generate more wastewater. Continued growth, particularly as it includes increased urbanization, will also affect the amount and quality of storm-water runoff, a major source of water pollution in the region. In addition, the growing population will require more drinking water, and potentially exacerbate the water quality problems associated with increasing water supplies. Since the issuance of the 208 plan in 1979, the region has lacked a comprehensive framework for planning for future wastewater treatment plant development and expansion. Current 'conformity' procedures exist, under the mandates of the federal Clean Air Act, to ensure that individual development or expansion projects are not in conflict with regional air quality objectives. The process of ensuring conformity with the regions air quality and water quality objectives will be facilitated by updating the information in the 208 plan regarding population projections for the regions wastewater facility service areas. Such an update, conducted in cooperation with local wastewater treatment agencies, is to be included as part of the RCP process. 2. FUTURE NON-POINT SOURCE MANAGEMENT Nonpoint source pollution, and in particular stormwater runoff, is increasingly becoming the most significant water pollution source in the region, particularly for coastal waters. Agriculture is also a large generator of nonpoint source pollution. The federal, state, and local programs and resources dedicated toward water quality, however, have traditionally had a primary focus on point sources (.e., discharges from wastewater treatment facilities and industries). While this attention to point-source pollution has resulted in considerable positive improvements in water quality, emphasis on nonpoint sources will be crucial to making additional and needed progress. Such an emphasis on noupoint sources, however, will require significant resources. A comprehensive analysis of the potential costs associated with nonpoint source pollution control is needed, along with an identification of potential sources for this funding. Such an analysis will facilitate future discussions in the region regarding policy options for addressing nonpoint source pollution. In addition, because of the relative importance of nonpoint source pollution, the region will need to evaluate the resources it currently expends on water pollution control to consider, (1) whether the total amount is disproportionately spent on point sources, and (2) whether changes in where the money is spent need to be considered to maximize public benefits. In addition, planning for the control and quality improvement of nonpoint source pollution needs to be more fully integrated into the local planning process. Additional attention in local general plan development focusing on the nonpoint source pollution issue is critical in effective control of this significant source of pollution. SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 6 Page 11-15 Chapter Eleven • Water Quality 3. WATERSHEDS AS A PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK A growing consensus exists among the water pollution community that more effective planning and management of water quality could be achieved through a process of 'comprehensive watershed management.' A watershed is the system of creeks, streams, and rivers that flow into a common water body and includes the associated riparian habitat. Watersheds are distinct ecosystems, such that changes to one part of the system can have effects on other parts. For example, changes in the riparian vegetation to a stream that eventually flows into a lake can increase the pollutant loading to that stream and impair the water quality of the lake. The traditional planning and management of water quality has focused primarily on ind6jd ua___ aLwat••!�'•&. In addition, coordination among the water pollution agencies, various land use agencies, water supply agencies, and other public entities that affect a watershed has been sporadic. In watershed management, both public and private agencies that rely upon or manage components of a water body, work in a cooperative fashion to determine the best strategy for improving water quality in the watershed. 7bese 'stakeholders' jointly determine the problems in the watershed, search for consensus on the actions to be taken, and then implement those actions in an integrated fashion. Such cooperative effort wfll lead to more cost-effective solutions to ensuring that the 'beneficial uses' of the region's waterbodies are maintained. The Santa Monica Bay Restoration Project (SMBRP) represents an example of watershed management on a broad scale. The SMBRP is part of the federal National Estuary Program and is required to develop a comprehensive plan for improving water quality in the bay. This plan is being developed through the coordinated efforts of federal, state, and local government agencies, industry representatives, and community and environmental groups. Sintflar types of coordinated actions are developing to address the water quality problems of the Salton Sea and the Santa Ana River watershed. These watershed management projects serve as examples to be used for other watersheds in the region. 4. FINANCING GROUNDWATER CLEANUPS The region faces a significant environmental and economic problem from contaminated groundwater. The contamination threatens important sources of drinking water for the growing region. In addition, the liability associated with cleaning up contaminated groundwater poses financial threats to local industries and to local governments. A coordinated, local-based approach to addressing the groundwater issue in areas such as the San Gabriel Valley is crucial to the future of the region. Such an approach would leverage the available federal and state resources to address the problems, while apportioning the local financial burden in an equitable fashion. 5. REDUCING REGULATORY OVERLAP The watershed management approaches, as described above, wfll require agencies at all level of governments to work together in a cooperative fashion. This chapter identifies some of the many agencies that affect water quality in the region. As the region faces the difficult problems posed by nonpoint source pollution, the ability for these agencies to work together effectively, while avoiding unnecessary duplication, will be crucial. Page 11-16 0 December, 1993 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan Chapter Eleven • Water Quality H. RECOMMENDATIONS AND POLTCY OPTIONS To improve the planning and management of water quality in the SCAG region, this chapter offers several recommendations. These recommendations include actions or activities that can be undertaken by regional entities, such as SCAG, as well as policies and programs that can be explored by other agencies, particularly at the state and federal level. These recommendations include the following: 1. Water quality regulatory implementation should be streamlined and overlaps with other regulatory programs should be identified and eliminated to reduce economic impacts on local businesses. Discussion: This Water Quality chapter is a first step at a comprehensive identification of the various water-related agencies in the SCAG region. The continuation of this effort along with other state and regional streamlining projects is critical to improving water quality in the region in the most cost- efficient manner. Such efforts include streamlining permitting process, including the integration of water permitting into ongoing 'one-stop' permitting efforts and reducing overlaps in the overlapping responsibilities of water quality and other agencies in such areas as solid waste facility permitting and inspections. 2. 'Watershed management' programs and strategies should be encouraged, recognizing the primary role of local governments in such efforts. Discussion: Watershed management can be encouraged in several ways. Changes to current federal and state law for water quality should be amended to incorporate watershed management as an integral part of state and federal water quality programs. These watershed management efforts should facilitate local decision-making in establishing the water quality objectives for a water body and the strategies for achieving those objectives, including the appropriate public expenditures on point source control and nonpoint source control, strategies for wedands enhancement, and funding approaches. In addition, federal and state funding of water quality projects should be targeted at recommendations stemming from water quality planning efforts and should be flexible to finance a variety of water quality projects. 3. SCAG shall play a coordinating role in watershed management efforts at the subregional level by 1) providing consistent regional data; 2) serving as a liaison between local watershed efforts at state and federal agencies; and 3) ensuring that watershed planning is consistent with other planning objectives (e.g., transportation, air quality, water supply). Discussion: Watershed management initiatives will be most effective when local governments are integrated into the decision-making process. The regional comprehensive planning process offers the opportunity for incorporating an existing local-based decision making system into watershed management. Existing subregions in SCAG are primarily established along jurisdictional boundaries. As appropriate watershed management boundaries are identified within the region, the appropriate linkage with subregional entities should be made so that watershed management can be part of the subregional Planning process. SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 • Page 11-17 Chapter Eleven • Water Quality 4. Opportunities for pollutant trading and other market-incentive water quality programs as an alternative to strict command-and-control regulation should be encouraged. Discussion: Appropriate waterbodies in the region for pollutant trading programs should first be identified. A pollutant trading system for water quality could operate similar to the RECLAIM program being considered for air quality. Under such a system, an overall pollutant loading limit for all dischargers into a water body would be established. Each facility discharging into the waterbody would be allocated, based on historical discharges, a specific number of credits. These credits allow the facility to discharge a specified amount of pollutants. The facility can either discharge less than the credits allow and sell the credits or can buy credits from another facility and discharge more than their original allocation. A trading system encourages facilities in which it is less expensive to reduce their pollution to do so while at the same time reducing the costs to facilities that face higher costs. The Los Angeles and Santa Ana Rivers may be potential candidates. Additional analysis and evaluation should be conducted to determine whether a pilot project for pollutant trading can be initiated on one of these, or another appropriate, waterbody. S. SCAG shall support regional efforts to identify and cooperatively plan for wetlands to facilitate both the sustaining of the amount and quality of wetlands in the region as well expedite the process for obtaining wetlands permits. Discussion. The urban growth in the region has resulted in the loss of vast amounts of wetlands. Wetlands play an important role in maintaining water quality by providing natural filtration systems. In addition, wetlands are important habitats for many types of species. However, current efforts at wetlands protection through the federal permitting process is a piece-meal approach, which can result in long, sometimes unnecessary, delays in project approval. More regional, cooperative planning for maintaining and/or improving the region's wetlands is needed. Such an approach would encourage a regional identification of all wetlands resources and thew relative value and provide a framework for making future decisions in the region regarding wetlands. 6. Cleaning up contamination in the regions major groundwater aquifers is critical to the long-term economic and environmental health of the region. The financing of such clean-ups should leverage state and federal resources and minimize significant impacts on the local economy. Discussion: The contamination of major aquifers in the SCAG region threatens our long-term water supply. Because of the unique nature of this contamination Ci.e., hundreds of contributing sources, numerous water purveyors, and the large population relying on the water source), different approaches than the application of stringent federal joint-and-several liability are necessary. Current state and federal proposals for the San Gabriel Basin are important steps in addressing this problem while maintaining the economic viability of the region. 7. Water reclamation shall be encouraged throughout the region where feasible and appropriate to reduce reliance on imported water and to reduce wastewater discharges. Current administrative impediments to increased use of wastewater should be addressed. Discussion. Water reclamation is a priority in both the Water Quality and Water Resources chapters of the RCP. The Water Resources chapter projects that a growing percentage of total water supply will Page 11-18 0 December, 1993 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan Chapter Eleven • Water Quality come from reclaimed water. To achieve this or higher percentages, current impediments to water reclamation must be overcome in the region. Tbese impediments include financial obstacles, insufficient infrastructure, health concerns, and public perception. A regional cooperative effort among water supply agencies, local governments, public works officials, state and federal agencies, and others should be initiated to identify and address these impediments. 8. Wastewater treatment agency facility planning and facility development should be consistent with population projections contained in the RCP. - Discussion. Ensuring that wastewater capacity planning and development is consistent with SCAG's population projections serves two important goals. First, it ensures that adequate treatment capacity exists to manage the region's waste thereby serving an important clean water objective. One of the primary purposes of the Clean Water Act Section 208 planning process is to ensure that adequate and environmentally beneficial treatment capacity will be available to meet the demands of a growing Southern California population. Without such capacity, improperly treated wastewater will contribute w poor water quality in the region. Second, consistency between wastewater capacity expansion and population projections helps ensure that increases in capacity do not unnecessarily out pace projections of future population and development. Capacity expansions may serve as an inducement to development and growth in a manner that is contrary to the region's air quality goals. EPA recognized this is the federal Clean Air Act. Section 316 of the Act gives EPA the authority to withhold grants for sewage treatment works construction if such concoction does not conform with the region's air quality plan. In addition, Section 176 of the Act prohibits any federal agency from providing financial assistance, licensing, permitting or approving any activity that does not conform with a regioW s air plan. This section of the act also prohibits a metropolitan planting agency, such as SCAG, from granting approval of a project, program, or plan that does not conform to the air plan. Pursuant to modifications made to this section in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, EPA is currently in the process of promulgating regulations on the procedures for determining conformity. In conjunction with the 1991 air quality plan for the South Coast Air Basin, SCAG developed conformity procedures for wastewater treatment facilities. These procedures require wastewater facility plans and projects to meet two criteria before a finding of conformity can be made. First, they must be sized and service-phased according to the population projections for the service area adopted or approved by SCAG. Second, the wastewater treatment agency must have a monitoring and reporting system for projects within its service area. This system must include an on-going process and procedures for reviewing and commenting on all general development projects, for monitoring development approvals, for sharing information with other regional and local agencies, and for reporting information to SCAG. The finding of conformity, as described in the conformity procedures, is to be made in the time the Regional Water Quality Control Board either issues or renews the NPDES permit for the facility. Since the development of SCAG's conformity procedures, two changes have occurred. First, questions have been raised regarding whether the issuance of an NPDES permit by the Regional Water Quality Control Board constitutes a federal action and, therefore, whether a finding of conformity is required at the time such a permit is issued. Second, as indicated above, EPA is developing regulations for conformity to implement Section 176 of the Clean Air Act. Proposed regulations were issued on March Chapter Eleven • Water Quality 15, 1993 and final regulations are anticipated in early 1994. The proposed regulations exempted NPDES permits from the conformity review, although it is unclear whether this exemption will remain in the final regulations. Following the promulgation of these final regulations, SCAG will be required to revise its existing conformity guidelines. It should be noted that specific conformity guidelines adopted as part of a State Implementation Plan, such as those developed by SCAG, can be more restrictive than the federal rules. In light of the uncertainties surrounding the federal conformity requirements, as well as the need to have a region-wide process for ensuring appropriate wastewater capacity growth, SCAG is proposing the following actions as a supplement to the existing conformity procedures. Consistent with the philosophy underlying the RCP, this process emphasizes cooperative efforts between local agencies (i.e., wastewater treatment facilities) and SCAG. Under this process, SCAG will allocate its growth projections by each wastewater treatment service area in the region and work cooperatively with wastewater treatment agencies to ensure that facility plans are consistent with such growth projections. Such an effort is designed to minimize the need for conformity review for specific projects. Actiors The following actions are proposed: 1. Upon issuance of the final RCP, SCAG will allocate the growth projections contained in the growth management component of the RCP by the service area of each wastewater treatment agency in the SCAG region. 2. SCAG, in conjunction with wastewater treatment agencies in the region, will review existing facility plans to ensure that the population, housing, and employment projections underlying these plans are consistent with the SCAG-adopted projections. 3. In instances in which wastewater treatment facility plans are not consistent with SCAG-adopted growth projections, SCAG will work with such agencies to either: 1) modify facility plans to conform with the growth projections, or 2) revaluate the growth projections for the wastewater treatment agency service area, or 3) both. 4. Facility plans found to be consistent with the SCAG-adopted population projections will be incorporated into the water quality component of the regional comprehensive plan. 5. Conformity determinations for specific facilities will be conducted consistent with the 1991 conformity guidelines. However, SCAG will reevaluate these guidelines in light of the final regulations to be adopted by EPA regarding conformity, and the changes to the State Implementation Plan that must follow. TLe 1991 guidelines will, in cooperation with wastewater treatment agencies, be revised accordingly. 6. Eligible projects under state and federal water quality infrastructure funding programs should include a range of projects, including non-point source and water reclamation projects. - - -- _ 1001 SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Pla. Chapter Eleven • Water Quality Discussion: Current state and federal funding (as well as future funding under a reauthorized Clean Water Act) must recognize the unique water quality problems of different regions and provide flexibility in financing different types of water quality projects. I. INTEGRATION OF WATER QUALITY AND OTHER REGIONAL ISSUES Water quality is related to several of the other issues in the RCP. The most direct relationship is with water supply. Poor water quality in the region—in particular, poor groundwater quality — is and will continue to have significant implications for the supply of water for drinking and commercial purposes in the region. In addition, water quality in other regions of the state is interconnected with the supply of imported water into this region. Other interrelationships between water quality and other chapters of the plan include: • Economic Development and Water Quality. Maintaining water quality is important to the economic viability of the region. However, there are increasing regulatory and liability costs associated with maintaining water quality and these costs can have adverse effects on operating expenses of regional businesses. Businesses are also subject to regulatory costs to meet NPDES permit requirements or pretreatment standards. In some areas, these costs may be increasing due to the poor quality of the imported water supply. This chapter emphasizes the need to streamline water quality regulation and to explore market-based regulatory alternatives when possible. Liability costs are primarily associated with the clean-up of contaminated groundwater in the San Gabriel Valley, San Fernando Valley, and other areas. This chapter recognizes the need to address these groundwater concerns while not driving companies out of business. • Growth Management and Water Quality. The projected population growth in this plan will have significant implications for maintaining water quality, by increasing the demand for wastewater treatment and by increasing the urbanized surface area and, therefore, the amount of urban runoff. • Air Quality and Water Quality. The impact of poor air quality on water quality is an important, but poorly understood, issue. Some research indicates that air contaminants can substantially contribute to poor water quality in the region through a process known as 'aerial fallout.' Thus, efforts at improving air quality as described in the air quality chapter, may also have benefits for water quality. • Solid and Hazardous Waste and Water Quality. Primary objectives for solid and bazardous waste management are to reduce and recycle wastes and to provide environmentally safe disposal options. These objectives contribute directly to improved water quality by protecting groundwater and surface water from contamination. An additional important relationship is the need for adequate flood control in the region and the impact of flood control projects on nonpoint source runoff. Traditionally, flood control projects have increased the amount of urban runoff by directly channeling stormwater through a system of storm drains, concrete channels, and channelized rivers to the ocean. Thus, the need to maintain adequate flood control is often in conflict with efforts to reduce urban runoff. More information is needed on the costs and safety implications of alternative flood control systems in the region. SCAG 0 Draft Regional Comprehensive Plan December, 1993 0 Page 11-21 ie COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �Nf' of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1 199M Ews AVENUE a O.SOX 9121 FOUNEAIN VAL Y,CALIFORNIA 92129R121 Otn962-2An RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS MARCH 9, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. 9 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 210N94 PAGE 01 D REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02N9194 POSTING DATE 02M9/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 135546 AG TECH COMPANY $50,382.14 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 136547 AMERICAN TELEPHONE&TELEGRAPH $989.19 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 135540 ABLE INDUSTRIES $954.20 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SUPPLIES 135549 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP. $9,29800 ENGINE TESTING J-19 135550 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $53.364.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9.89 135551 ALPHAGAZ $1.482.38 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135552 STN-CLOUMBUS $12.99 SUBSCRIPTION 135553 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $270.83 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 135554 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $275.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT ➢ 135555 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $7,129,82 COMPUTER SOFTWARE T 135558 ASSOC.ADMINIS.&CONSULTANTS $500.00 DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS = 135557 AMSA $12,803,00 MEMBERSHIP DUES M.O.1-12-94 C7 135558 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $1,613,62 PAYROLL SERVICES ➢ 135569 AWARDS&TROPHIES $24.46 PLAQUES 13556D SAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $9,853.31 LAB SUPPLIES 135561 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $430.05 TRUCK WASH TICKETS rTl 135562 BELL SECURITY $671.00 SECURITY SERVICES 3 135563 WT BILLARD $35.62 BUILDING REPAIRS Tt 135564 BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS,INC. $57.38 LAB SUPPLIES 00 135565 BID VENTURES,INC. $162.00 LAB SUPPLIES I 135566 BLACK&VEATCH $31.504.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146 135567 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $519.27 LAB SUPPLIES n 135568 BROWN&CALDWELL CONSULTANTS $16,920.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES RES 93-101 r 135569 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 135570 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $17.152.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.8-10-92 135571 CH2M HILL $8.410.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 N 135572 CRC PRESS,INC. $42.50 LAB SUPPLIES z 135573 CRTC-CWPCA,INC. $315.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 135574 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $19.049.54 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38,PI-34 t-T 135575 FIBERGRATEICHEMWEST $3,146.30 PUMP PARTS 135576 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $30.97 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135577 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $786.69 LAB SUPPLIES 135578 COMPUSA,INC. 54,314.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135579 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $187.57 TRUCK PARTS 135580 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1.636.75 ELECTRIC PARTS 135581 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS $49.84 PRINTING SERVICES 135582 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $194.93 TOOLS 135583 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $2,230.43 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 135584 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $10,823.00 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 135585 DAPPERTIRE 5413.76 TIRES 135586 PETER C.DAVID CO. $27.620.10 CONSTRUCTION 7-20 135587 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $4.788.57 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-11.93 135508 DIFILIPPOASSOCINTES $122.84 PRINTING 135589 DANNY L.DILLON $10,000.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 135590 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $820.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 135591 DUNKEL BROS MACH.MOVING $641.25 EQUIPMENT MOVING .FUND NO 9799 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/DL PAGE 02 3? REPORT NUMBER AP43 N COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02M9/94 POSTING DATE 02A19/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135592 EASTMAN,INC. $5,3B0.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135593 EDWARDS DIV.OF OS BLDG SYS. $833.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135594 EMERGENCY LIFELINE INC. $1,356.03 EMERGENCY SUPPLIES 135595 ENCHANTER,INC. $5,040,00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6A0-92 135598 ENTECH LAB AUTOMATION $223,25 LAB EQUIPMENT 135597 ESSENCE GROUP $480,94 COMPUTER PARTS 135598 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $339.40 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 135599 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $747.79 AIR FREIGHT 135600 FERRELLGAS $68.10 PROPANE 135601 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1,020.18 FILTERS m 135602 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $216.45 LAB SUPPLIES O 135603 FOOTHILL PROJECT MANAGEMENT $1,669.00 RESIDENT NOTIFICATION SERVICES n 135604 CLIFFORD A FORKERT 58,440.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES 135605 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $150.38 PHOTO SUPPLIES 135605 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $12,066.98 WATER USE m 135607 CRY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $2.150.00 APPLICATION FEE 3 135608 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $257.25 PERMIT FEE # 135609 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $346.10 PAINT SUPPLIES O0 135610 THE FOXBORO CO. $313.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135811 FREEDOM IMAGING 560.86 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135612 FREEMEN ALTERNATIVE RESOURCES $4,756.00 CONSULTING SERVICES y 135613 CITY OF FULLERTON $99.45 WATER USE r 135614 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3.708.76 CHEMICALS 135615 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION $50,000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-15A �y 135616 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4.422.27 TELEPHONE SERVICES 135617 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $630.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES N 135618 GRASBY S.T.I. $1,437.27 CENTRAL GENERATION PARTS 135619 DGA CONSULTANTS 52,860.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6.10-92 ('l 135620 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $240.00 TRUCK PARTS 135621 HATCH 8 KIRK,INC. 5432A7 MECHANICAL PARTS N 135622 HEATHER NICKERSON $1,211.86 VEHICLE DAMAGE 135623 HOLMES 8 NARVER,INC. $43,975.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES P7d4 135624 HOME DEPOT $229.80 HARDWARE 135625 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN $68.91 BICYCLE PARTS 135626 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL - $77.819.65 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 135627 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $460.91 CONNECTORS 135628 INTERNED $161.08 LAB SUPPLIES 135629 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $852.67 BATTERIES 135630 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $132.36 WATER USE 135631 JAYS CATERING $374.98 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 135632 JENSEN TOOLS,INC. $134.05 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 135633 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $934.95 ELECTRIC PARTS 135634 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY $1.790.81 MACHINE SUPPLIES 135635 THE KEITH COMPANIES $5,423.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-36R 135636 KING BEARING,INC. $1,459.37 MACHINE SUPPLIES 135637 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $500.23 TOOLS D I N 51 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/94 PAGE 03 ' D REPORT NUMBER AP43 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY W CLAIMS PAID 02/09/94 POSTING DATE 02/09/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135638 LEOI-TECH $32000 COMPUTER SERVICES 135639 LEE B NO CONSULTING ENGR. $43.561.03 ENGINEERING SERVICES PIAO-182 135640 LORAIN PRODUCTS E1,251.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135641 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $970.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 135642 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY E477.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135643 MPS E117.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 135644 MACOMCO $412.86 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135645 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $373.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES n 136646 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $80762 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 135647 RS MEANS CO.,INC. $90.42 PUBLICATION m 135648 MERIDIAN DIAGNOSTICS,INC. E298.75 LAB SUPPLIES Z 135649 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS $75,332.88 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENTS 17 n 135650 MIDWAY MFG,B MACHINING E3,815.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS AB 135652 MISSION I A WESTERN VISUAL PRES. ,30 .24 UNIFORM RENTALS 135852 MISSION INDUSTRIES E3,308.24 UNIFORM REN7ALS m 135653 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $1.020.00 LAB SERVICES 3 135654 MONTROY SUPPLY CO. $49.82 SIGNS TL 135655 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. E970.07 PUMP PARTS 00 135656 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 1 135657 WEAL SUPPLY CO. $1.931.91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135658 NEW AGE WATER TECHNOLOGY $9.02 VALVES n 135659 NEW ENGIAND SIOLABS,INC. $356.40 LAB SUPPLIES r 135660 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $4.79 WATER USE 135661 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $251.23 TRUCK PARTS cy 135662 ORANGE COURIER $267.00 COURIER SERVICES y 136663 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $1.252.11 FITTINGS 135664 ORRICK HERRINGTON B SUTCLIFFE E30,000.00 SPECIAL COUNCIL-TAXABLE COMMER.PAPER M.0.11.10.93 .� 135665 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,940.98 SPECIALTY GASES 135666 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $10,989.05 REIMBURSE WORKER5 COMP.INSURANCE n 135667 PSI $385.50 STEAM CLEANING SERVICES (n 135668 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) E40.84 OPERATING SUPPLIES 135669 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $8.624.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135670 PACIFIC PARTS E452.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135671 PACIFIC PNEUMATICS,INC. $47.52 FILTER 135672 PACIFIC PUBLISHERS E124.84 PUBLICATION 135573 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $214.65 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135674 PACIFIC BELL $691.63 TELEPHONE SERVICES 135675 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $159.65 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 135676 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY E939A0 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 135677 PALMIERI.TYLER.WIENER, $1,338.90 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 135678 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 135679 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $179.69 LAB SUPPLIES 135580 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $48,066.57 CHEMICALS 135681 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $141,796.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5.8.91 135682 PUTNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP. $103.18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 135683 POLYPURE.INC. $16.818.37 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 D FV14D NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2103194 PAGE 04 D REPORT NUMBER AP43 I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r CLAIMS PAID 02/09/94 POSTING DATE 02/09M4 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135684 POWER DESIGN $6,107.32 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 135685 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $598.43 SOIL TESTING 135686 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. 65,04BAD CONSULTING SERVICES-FINANCIAL 135687 QUEST MEDIA 8 SUPPLIES $1.29724 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135658 OUESTRON CORP. $2,470.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135689 RMB ENGINEERING/MILLTRONICS $4,663.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135890 R M CONTROLS $421.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135691 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $6,093.19 ELECTRIC MOTORS D 135692 R.S.CABINET CO. $323.25 PLAN HOLD CABINET G� 135693 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $1,130.43 LAB SUPPLIES m 135594 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $2.624.06 PLUMBING SUPPLIES z 135695 ROBBINS SCIENTIFIC $301.76 LAB SUPPLIES C 135696 ROSEMOUNT,INC. $62.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS D 135697 RYAN-HERCO 6463.0E METAL 135698 SB J CHEVROLET 6490.12 TRUCK REPAIRS m 135699 SKC WEST $040.60 SAFETY SUPPLIES 3 135700 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 61,742.2E PLUMBING SUPPLIES 4t 135701 DOUGSARVIS $750.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING O0 135702 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $156,932.28 CONSTRUCTION 5-36 135703 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $683.56 SPECIALTY GASES 1 135704 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $251.65 WATER USE D 135705 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.217.92 TOOLS r 13570E SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. 6436.48 TRUCK PARTS r 135707 SHURELUCK SALES $2,878.65 TOOLSAIARDWARE cy 135708 SIDU MFG CO. $3,294.29 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135709 SIGNAL FLASH CO. $460.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 135710 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC 61,085.50 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 135711 SMITH-EMERY CO. $60.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 135712 SMITH PIPE 8 SUPPLY $56.57 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135713 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $259.24 TOOLS (n 135714 SOFFA ELECTRIC,INC. $92.424.15 CONSTRUCTION J-20 135715 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $16,895.81 POWER 135716 SO.CAL GAS.CO. $9.895.79 NATURAL GAS 135717 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $7,232.10 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 135718 SOUTH PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL 62,941.5E CHEMICALS 136719 SOUTH SHORE WINDOW MAINT. $2,083.34 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 135720 SOUVENIR PHOTO $829.15 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 135721 STAMEN L SPASSOFF P.E. 63,080.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 135722 WESTALLOY,INC. $478.73 WELDING SUPPLIES 135723 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $657.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135724 STANDARD REGISTER CO. $635.84 LAB SUPPLIES 135725 STATE STREET BANK $5.847.71 TRUSTEE SERVICES 135726 GARY G.STREED $7.882.72 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING B TRAVEL 135727 SUMMIT STEEL 64,056.03 METAL 135726 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $10.74 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 135729 SUPER CHEM CORP. $810.87 CHEMICALS I r FyNDNO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03194 PAGE05 n1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY REPORT NUMBER AP43 ut CLAIMS PAID02109/94 POSTING DATE 02/09M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135130 TCH ASSOCIATES E1.27940 LAB SUPPLIES 135731 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY E7.606.04 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 135732 TEKDRAULICS $7,005.66 MECHANICAL PARTS 135733 TEKTRONIX,INC. $3.191.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135734 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS E1,530.29 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 135735 THOMAS BROS MAPS $197.95 PRINTING 135736 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,004.89 MECHANICAL PARTS 135737 TIS TROPICAL FISH E118.53 LAB SUPPLIES n 135730 TONY'S LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $169.91 LOCKS&KEYS m 135739 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $1271.00 TRAVEL SERVICES m 135740 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $1,095.55 TRUCK PARTS z 135741 TRUCO.INC. $94,82 LAB SUPPLIES C n 134712 TRUESDAIL LABS E2,28t18 LAB SERVICES 135743 TWINING LABORATORIES $5.479.44 LIB SERVICES -1 135744 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS E162.86 TRUCK PARTS m 135745 UHLER,INC. $166.163.40 CONSTRUCTION 5-32 85-33 3 135746 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $375.05 PARCEL SERVICES 135747 UNITED STATES BIOCHEMICAL $214.47 LAB SUPPLIES 00 135748 UPCHURCH SCIENTIFIC E418.50 LAB SUPPLIES I 135749 VWR SCIENTIFIC E4.746.71 LAB SUPPLIES 135750 VALIN CORPORATION Et00.90 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES n 135751 VALLEY CRIES SUPPLY CO. $644.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES r 135752 VERTEX SYSTEMS $1,631.95 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT r 135753 WEST COASTINSTRUMENTSEMICA E071.61 GAUGE t7 135750 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY E2d,077.81 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.&12-92 y 135755 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $157.10 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES --4 135756 WHATMAN LAB SALES,INC. $995.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135757 WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT INST. $212.50 PUBLICATION ('t 135758 JOHN WILEY&SONS,INC. $371.00 PUBLICATION -1 136759 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $22,376.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 135760 XEROX CORP. $176.18 COPIER LEASES 135761 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $947.98 VALVES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 02/09/94 $1,572.880.63 ri lJT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/94 PAGE O6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID b2109M POSTING DATE 02M9194 T SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPER FUND $8,237.94 02 OPER FUND 24,875.25 03 OPER FUND 41,139.09 03 CAP FAC FUND 5.423.29 #5 OPER FUND 4,142.90 y 05 CAP FAC FUND 324,72426 Cl #6 OPER FUND 4,86424 fn #7 OPER FUND 7,30505 z #7 CAP FAC FUND 37,349.38 CJ � 011 OPER FUND 7,386.64 011 CAP FAC FUND 5,029.60 #130PER FUND 102.84 3 014 OPER FUND 73240 #14 CAP FAC FUND 2,097.42 #586 OPER FUND 3,146.30 00 #586 CAP FAC FUND 7.841.85 #687 OPER FUND 18,10 JT OPER FUND 538,036.05 r CORP 385,751.73 I— SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 12,70D.91 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL - 151,387.48 L7 ti 51,572,880.83 1 n --I y A POND NO' 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16194 PAGE 01 - REPORT NUMBER AP43 Lb COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY H. CLAIMS PAID 2123M POSTING DATE 2/23194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 135793 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES $809.80 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135794 AG TECH COMPANY $55.896.30 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-911 135795 AT&T $3,566.35 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 135796 AT&T $301.90 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 135797 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. 553.34 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS 135798 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $225.652.50 CONSTRUCTION P2-53.1 135799 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1,379.20 MECHANICAL PARTS 135800 AMERICAN CABLING&COMM. $50.64 CABLE 135801 AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION $59.00 LAS SUPPLIES n 135802 AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO. $4.875.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-51 Cl 135803 AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO. $22,548.50 SEWER REPAIRS Z 135804 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 5500.00 SEWER REPAIRS 135805 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $4.28 COMPUTER SUPPLIES :1. 135806 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $957.90 VALVES 135807 APEX DRUM CO. $173.00 DRUM PICK-UP 135808 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,574.07 NOTICES&ADS m 1358D9 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $5.403.04 LAB SUPPLIES 3 135010 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $710.30 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135811 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,291A0 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES Go 135812 ARMOR-VAC 5420.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 135813 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $1,411.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 135814 ASSOC.ADMINIS.&CONSULTANTS $7.855.72 SFI INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS n 135815 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT r 135816 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $5,394.89 PAYROLL SERVICES 135817 THEAVEBURYGROUP $5,995.68 MECHANICAL PARTS CJl 135610 AWARDS&TROPHIES $434.66 PLAQUES 135019 BAILEY CONTROLS COMPANY $1.086.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS N-I 135820 BANANA BLUEPRINT $7.077.42 PRINTING M.O.10.10-90 135021 BANK OF THE WEST $2,982.04 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 3-23-2 135822 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $920.05 BATTERIES --1-1 135823 SAUER COMPRESSOR $957.74 COMPRESSOR PARTS N 135824 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3.516.34 LAB SUPPLIES 135825 DON C.BEATTIE P.E. $2,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 135820 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $658.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135827 BELL SECURITY $1.868.13 SECURITY SERVICES 135828 SIOMERIEUX VITEK,INC. $4,750.57 LAB SUPPLIES 135829 BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS,INC. $110.43 LAB SUPPLIES 135830 BLACK&VEATCH $25,807.11 ENGINEERING SERVICES PIA6 135831 BOERINGER MANNHEIM $350.63 LAS SUPPLIES 135832 BON-A-RUES $378.85 TRUCK PARTS 135833 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $38,927.52 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18,7-19 135834 BRADY USA,INC. $86.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135835 13RITHINEE ELECTRIC $228.73 ELECTRIC PARTS 135830 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $110.46 PUBLICATION 135037 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,768.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 135838 BUY-CHEM DISTRIBUTORS 5285.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES DJ FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16194 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 tv COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY N CLAIMS PAID 2/23/94 POSTING DATE 2R3194 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135839 CEPA $250.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135840 CS COMPANY $2,408.10 VALVES 135841 CALTROL,INC. $1.934.82 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135842 CARLETON ENGINEERS $4,154.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 135543 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $69.495.57 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33,J-34 135944 CENTURY SAFETY INST.8 SUPPLY $15.788.40 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135545 CERFNET $17.10 COMPUTER SERVICES 135846 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING $4.810.23 PUMP 135847 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $67.51 LAB SUPPLIES 135848 COUCH 8 SONS $575,489.70 CONSTRUCTION S-37-4 'n 135849 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,386.23 PUMP PARTS m 135050 COMPUTER DATACOM $147.49 COMPUTER HARDWARE Z O 135851 COMPUSA,INC. E4,870.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARE n 135852 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $155.99 TRUCK PARTS 135853 CONNER PERIPHERALS,INC. $510.60 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS —1 135654 CONSOLWATED ELECTRICAL DIST $11.082.07 ELECTRIC PARTS m 135655 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $630.00 TOOLS 3 135855 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $10.300.41 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.7-17-91 135857 COOPER INDUSTRIES.INC. $2,440.31 CENTRAL GEN.ENGINE PARTS 00 135858 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $1.223.27 TRUCK PARTS I 135859 COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT $21,150.00 CONNECTION FEE REFUND n 135860 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 3214.45 ELECTRIC PARTS 135861 DAILY PILOT $66.00 NOTICES 8 ADS 135862 DARTEK COMPUTER SUPPLY $122.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES CJ 135883 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $3,100.95 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.5-11-93 135864 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $753.71 PRINTING N 135865 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $4.985.31 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 135856 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $1.397.39 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL M.O.1-13.92 135867 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. F8,242.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE S REPAIRS c� 135868 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $76,562.53 CONSTRUCTION PId6-1 135869 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $5.400.00 MEDICAL INSURANCE CONSULTANT N 135870 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $2.M.86 PAINT SUPPLIES 135871 ESP NORTH $127.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 13SS72 EASTMAN.INC. $6.466.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135873 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. 811.95 LAB SUPPLIES 135874 ENCHANTER.INC. $3,360.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6.10-92 135875 MARSHALL FAIRRES $78.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 135876 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $357.50 AIR FREIGHT 135877 FERRELLGAS $120.49 PROPANE 135870 CHEMWEST.INC. $2,120.00 FIBERGLASS 135879 FISCHERB PORTER CO. $1.367.14 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 135880 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $144.81 LAB SUPPLIES 135981 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $37.47 LAB SUPPLIES 135882 CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $15.606.25 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6.10.92 135883 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $228.47 PHOTO SUPPLIES 135884 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $9.061.94 BUILDING PERMIT FEES J-23-1 Lb FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2116194 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY liJ CLAIMS PAID 2123M4 POSTING DATE 221194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135885 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $2.11 PAINT SUPPLIES 135BBS FREY ENVIRONMENTAL.INC. $565.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 135887 FURON DEKORON $95.00 CABLE 135888 EST,INC. $1.210.85 COMPUTER PARTS 135889 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $747.33 LUMBERIHARDWARE 135890 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY E1,656.12 CHEMICALS 135891 GEAR TECH S4,000.00 MACHINE INSPECTION 135892 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $335.14 ELECTRIC PARTS Y 135893 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4.273.95 TELEPHONE SERVICES Gl 135894 GEORGE LEECH 9 ASSOCIATES $75.23 FLOWMETERS M 135895 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $8.741.68 MECHANICAL PARTS Z 135896 VWY GRAINGER.INC. S354.82 ELECTRIC PARTS d n 135897 GRASEBYANDERSON $4.283.01 LAB SUPPLIES 17589E GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING E7,355.81 PRINTING 135899 DGA CONSULTANTS $1,885.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 M 1359DO HBO TECHNOLOGY $114.519.93 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2 3 135901 HS TYPE 9 GRAPHICS $12.93 PRINTING 1359W HACH COMPANY $191.70 CHEMICALS O0 135903 FREDA.HARPER E1,500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 135904 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC E843.77 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135905 HATCH 9 KIRK,INC. $580.42 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 13590E HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1.925.00 CONTAINER RENTALS r 135907 PL RAWN CO,INC. $136.39 FILTERS f'- 1359DB HELLO $39.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES 17 135909 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083,33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 135910 HEWLETTPACKARD S400.00 OFFICE MACHINE 135911 HOERSIGER CVS CALIF..INC. $292.67 MECHANICAL PARTS z 135912 HOMES 9 NARVER,INC. $59,040.91 ENGINEERING SERVICES P144 135913 HOME DEPOT $1,048.71 HARDWARE 135914 HOOKER'S REPAIR SERVICE E5520 LAB EQUIPMENT REPAIRS (n 135915 IRS HUGHES CO,INC. $1,677.17 PAINT SUPPLIES 13591E CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH E25.11B WATER USE 135917 IDEXX $403.95 LAB SUPPLIES 13591E IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $15.288.13 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.1 IAM2 135919 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS - $663.75 CONNECTORS 135920 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $573.02 BATTERIES 136921 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT E34AS WATER USE 135922 ISCO $1,942.53 LAB EQUIPMENT 135923 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1.025.82 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 135924 JAMB CONTRACTORS.INC. $67.912.65 CONSTRUCTION P2-23-5-1 135925 JIMB SUSPENSION SERVICE $75.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 13592E JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,009.26 ELECTRIC PARTS 135927 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $1.968.94 CHEMICALS 135928 THE KEITH COMPANIES $2,637.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3.36R 135929 KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP. $192.82 FREIGHT 135930 KING BEARING,INC. $3.191.91 MACHINE SUPPLIES W FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2116194 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 li J COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY r CLAIMS PAID 2J23194 POSTING DATE 2/23M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135931 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $3.523.83 HARDWARE 135932 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $671.64 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 135933 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $375.52 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135934 LEWCO ELECTRIC $263.07 TRUCK PARTS 135935 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $3,030.21 DEFERRED COMP TRUSTEE 135936 K.P.LINDSTROM.INC. E7,600.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIRONMENTAL 135937 MPS 5474.04 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 136938 MACOMCO $520.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135939 MSA $700.97 INSTRUMENT PARTS y 135940 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. E884,188.D0 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 ❑l 135941 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $120.79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES Z 135942 MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS..INC. $4,136.59 METERS Cy 135943 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES $1.848.56 ELECTRIC PARTS 135944 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $4.517.13 MECHANICAL.REPAIRS 135945 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $153.40 FITTINGS -1 135946 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $203.14 MECHANICAL PARTS fTl 135947 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,683.32 UNIFORM RENTALS 3 135948 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $70.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 3t 135949 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. $998.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135950 NASCO WEST,INC. $299.59 LAB SUPPLIES I 135951 NATIONAL FILTER MEDIA CORP. E4,268.81 MECHANICAL PARTS 135952 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $2.432.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 135953 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY $218.09 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES r-- 135951 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $817.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135955 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $629.36 COMPRESSOR PARTS O 135956 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE $142.00 PUBLICATION 135957 OLYMPUS CORP. $6,437.4D INSTRUMENT REPAIRS -� 135958 ORACLE CORPORATION $2,100.0D TRAINING REGISTRATION A 135959 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 5228.97 TRUCK PARTS t1 135960 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $202.03 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135961 ORANGE COURIER $133.50 COURIER SERVICES (n 135%2 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. SI.926.28 FITTINGS 135963 OXYGEN SERVICE 52,745.83 SPECIALTY GASES 135964 PC SYSTEMS DESIGN $138.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135965 P&S FILTRATION,INC. $2,903.18 MECHANICAL PARTS 135966 PACIFIC PARTS E809.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136967 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $6,492.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135966 PACIFIC BELL 5154.83 TELEPHONE SERVICES 135969 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $189.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 135970 PADGETT-THOMPSON $395.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 135971 PAGENET 52,054.24 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 135972 PASCAL A LUDWIG ENGINEERS $13.241.70 CONSTRUCTION J-32 135973 PASCAL&LUDWIG,INC. $128,600.60 CONSTRUCTION PI-38-2 135974 PASCAL AND LUDWIG E173,150.00 CONSTRUCTION P243.1 135975 PASCAL B LUDWIG $27,810.00 CONSTRUCTION P142 135976 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $274.69 LAB SUPPLIES to FUNDING 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL - PROCESSING DATE 2116194 PAGE 05 n Up REPORT NUMBER AP43 I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 2123194 POSTING DATE 223194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135977 PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS,INC. $18.129.58 CHEMICALS 135918 PICKWICK PAPER $306.02 STORAGE BOXES 135979 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS.INC. $127.937.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.548.91 135980 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $153.60 PLASTIC BOTTLES 135981 POLY ENTERPRISES.INC. SWI.70 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135982 POLYPURE,INC. E18,198.90 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3.11-92 135983 POSTAGE BY PHONE E5,000.00 POSTAGE 135984 POWER DESIGN $20.364.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135985 POWER PUMPS,INC. E196.38 PUMP PARTS 135955 POWER TRACK,INC. $159.69 PUMP PARTS fn 135987 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $82.00 ICE Z 135988 AQUA-CHEM,INC. $12.714.50 BOILER C7 135989 QUEST MEDIA B SUPPLIES $957.78 COMPUTER SOFTWARE L 135990 RUN COMPUTER SERVICES,INC. $13.541.60 CAMS STAFF TRAINING M.O.8.12-92 135991 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $374.97 ELECTRIC MOTORS 'i 135992 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1.602.71 TRASH REMOVAL m 135993 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. E2,091177 LAB SUPPLIES 3 h 135995 DR.SHIVAJVALVE O.,INC. $1.31$1.522.60 LAB SUPPLIES GO 135995 RED VALVE BAN IN . E1,277.56 VALVES 135998 DRESDNER BANK WEINHEIM E277.56 PUBLICATIONS I 135997 RED WING SHOES 5207.74 SAFETY SHOES 135998 BOLT DELIVERY $35.44 FREIGHT n 135999 THE REGISTER $1.087.09 NOTICES&ADS f 136000 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $6.036.97 PLUMBING SUPPLIES Cy 136001 RICH COLOR LAB $51.18 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 136002 RYAN-NERCO $1.504.33 PUMP PARTS N 136003 JOSEPH T.RYERSON&SON,INC. E636.94 TUBING A 136004 SKC WEST $1,334.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES 138005 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS E830.89 ELECTRIC PARTS c-t 136006 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS E269.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136007 DOUG SARMS E750.00 CPRIFIRST AID TRAINING 138008 SCHWING AMERICA E3,009.78 PUMP PARTS 136009 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $999.92 SPECIALTY GASES 136010 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $992.00 LAB REPAIRS 136011 LUDECA,INC. $1,140,57 MECHANICAL PARTS 136012 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $119.31 TOOLS 135013 SHURELUCK SALES $9.801.03 TOOLSHARDWARE 136014 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION $253.34 LAB SUPPLIES 136016 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $179.83 LAB SUPPLIES 136016 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1,583.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 136017 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $92.03 TOOLS 136018 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $5.376.25 PERMIT FEES 136019 SOUTH COAST WATER $466.49 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136020 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $39,574.11 POWER 135021 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $363,457.33 NATURAL GAS 136022 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $9.388.45 DIESELIUNLEADED FUEL lA In FUND,NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 211694 PAGEN Cy REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY m CLAIMS PAID 22394 POSTING DATE 22394 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 136023 SOUVENIR PHOTO $57.81 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 136024 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2.347.46 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 136025 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $1.393.94 METER 136026 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. 58,100IX) ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 136027 WESTALLOY,INC. $415.58 WELDING SUPPLIES 136028 SPECTRUM CHEMICAL $104.15 LAB SUPPLIES 136029 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCE SYSTEM $5.186.25 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136030 SRECO FLEXIBLE $2.319.14 TRUCK PARTS n 136031 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS $950.00 LAB EQUIPMENT REPAIRS m 136032 STRATAGENE $215.73 LAB SUPPLIES z 138033 GARY G.STREED $3.955.76 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL C7 136034 SUMMIT STEEL $7,281.54 METAL n 136035 SUNSET FORD $117.05 TRUCK PARTS 136036 SUPER CHEM CORP. $654.25 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 136037 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $155.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES :M 136038 TARRY ENGINEERING $3.840.00 PUMP PARTS 136039 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG,COMPANY $1,256.71 ELECTRIC CART PARTS zt 136040 TERRYS CAMERA $825.87 CAMERA EQUIPMENT 136041 TEXTILE ENGINEERING ASSOC. $3,176.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 136042 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5489.44 MECHANICAL PARTS ]a 136043 TILE MATTERS $164.64 PAINT SUPPLIES 136044 TONTS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $50SA2 LOCKS&KEYS r 136045 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $912.00 TRAVEL SERVICES 136046 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $1.235.16 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136047 TUSTIN DODGE $300.15 TRUCK PARTS (n 136049 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $451.00 LAB SUPPLIES 136049 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $260.49 PARCEL SERVICES 136050 UNITED SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $134.82 LAB SUPPLIES (-t 135051 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2,548.07 LAB SUPPLIES 136052 VALIN CORPORATION $525.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES (n 136053 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $711.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136054 VARIAN ASSOCIATES.INC. 5639.27 LAB SUPPLIES 136055 WATER ENVIRONMENTAL FED. $2.271.15 PUBLICATION 136056 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $10,626.96 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.842-92 136057 WESCO $840.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136058 B.L.WILCOX&ASSOC. $123.38 PUMP PARTS 136059 WITEG $411.61 LAB SUPPLIES 136060 ROURKE.WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN 584,542.76 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 136051 XEROX CORP. $2,890.94 COPIER LEASES 136062 EVERETT H.YORK CO. $1,001.32 CENTRAL GENERATION PARTS 136063 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 022394 $3,504,904.25 Co m FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 21IW94 PAGE07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 aj COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY I CLAIMS PAID 2123194 POSTING DATE 223194 V SUMMARY AMOUNT 02 OPER FUND $2.624.03 02 CAP FAC FUND 108.05 03 OPER FUND 14,003.79 03 CAP FAC FUND 2.675.42 A5 OPER FUND 714.54 08 CAP FAC FUND 21,475.30 n 07 OPER FUND 3,382.19 m 07 CAP FAC FUND 30,977.07 a 011 OPER FUND 0,314.35 C1 011 CAP FAC FUND 1,788.00 n 014 OPER FUND 112.00 A14 CAP FAC FUND 428.04 '4 0187 OPER FUND 320.10 m A588 OPER FUND 1,36724 3 0580 CAP FAC FUND 577.374.70 it A867 OPER FUND 2,103.18 W R814 OPER FUND 293.18 I IT OPER FUND 803,402.14 n CORP 1,846,590.50 r SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 20,813AI I- JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 152,171.14 t:i 53,504,904.25 1n n co co LV COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS February 15, 1994 .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1IMAA ELLIS AVENUE MEMORANDUM Pa 9011912J iOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFOPNIA 927EPL9127 9141 SM2411 TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager FROM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: ONE NEW SELF-PROPELLED AERIAL WORK PLATFORM SPECIFICATION NO. E-241 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, February 15, 1994,for the Purchase of One Self-Propelled Aerial Work Platform, Specification No. E-241. Tabulation of bids is as follows: DEALER TOTAL PRICE American HI-Lift $74,785.00 City Of Industry, CA Horizon High Reach $82,500.00 Fullerton, CA Western Pacific Alliance Company $85,183.00 Santa Fe Springs, CA Mac HI-Reach $88,539.00 La Mirada, CA It Is recommended the award be made to American Hi-Lift, the lowest responsible bidder, for their proposed amount of $74,785.00, plus sales tax. Sufficient funds have been budgeted for this purchase. Respectfully bm(ttetl, Ted Hoffman Purchasing Manager We hereby concur with the above recommendation: C . ry G. St eed Edwin E. Ho es Director of Finance Assistant Dir ctor of Maintenance "C AGENDA ITEM N9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C" RESOLUTION NO. 94-32 APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PURCHASE CONTRACT RE SPECIFICATION NO. P-140 CONSENTING TO ASSIGNMENT OF SAID CONTRACT FROM PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS. INC. TO VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS INC. A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO ASSIGNMENT OF PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF HYDROGEN PEROXIDE, SPECIFICATION NO. P-140, FROM PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS, INC. TO VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS INC. WHEREAS, the Districts and Peroxidation Systems, Inc. have previously entered into a Purchase Contract for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification No. P-140, dated October 1, 1993; and, WHEREAS, effective January 31, 1994, Peroxidation Systems, Inc. sold, assigned and transferred to Vulcan Peroxidation Systems Inc. its assets and business, including its rights and obligations relative to the contract for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification No. P-140; and, WHEREAS, Peroxidation Systems, Inc. and Vulcan Peroxidation Systems Inc. have requested the Districts to approve the assignment of the original purchase contract to Vulcan Peroxidation Systems Inc. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Amendment No. 1 dated March 9, 1994, to that certain Purchase Contract dated October 1, 1993, by and "D-1" AGENDA ITEM N9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "D 1" i between the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and , Peroxidation Systems, Inc. for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide, Specification No. P-140, authorizing and consenting to the assignment of said Purchase Contract from Peroxidation Systems, Inc. to Vulcan Peroxidation Systems Inc. , is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2 . That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Amendment No. 1, in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 9, 1994. RCII.On "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" Page 1 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Javaid Contractors, Inc. C. 0. No.: Three (3) Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Operations Center Expansion at Plant No 2 Job No P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No 2) Consultant: Brown & Caldwell Engineers Amount of this Change Order (Add)(DedueC $36.228.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - MODIFICATION OF AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM This item is for labor and material to design and install a wet pipe automatic fire sprinkler system for all areas of the Operations Center. This includes upsizing the piping and appurtenances to accommodate for the expansion of the system to sprinkle the remainder of both existing and expansion first floors which were not required per the contract drawings. The City of Huntington Beach Fire Department required the entire building be fire sprinkled. The contract documents only required the Training and Conference Rooms 1-19 on the first floor expansion and the entire basement in both the expansion and existing buildings to be fire sprinkled. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(8)1 of the General Provisions (Reference: PC2A; Javaid PCO #25). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $32,200.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 CALENDAR DAYS ITEM 2 - REROUTE SANITARY SEWER DRAIN This item reroutes the sewer line shown on the contract drawings that was to go through the Mechanical Room in the basement of the existing Operations Center. This reroute resulted in the deletion of the requirement to demolish and replace a portion of the two-foot thick concrete slab in the basement of the existing corridor and Mechanical Room. The sewerline is rerouted through the Boiler and HVAC Room of the Operations Center expansion and under the ramp area to the existing sump. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(8)1 of the General Provisions (Reference: PC7; Javaid PCO N28). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $(2,452.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 CALENDAR DAYS "E-1" AGENDA ITEM N9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" Page 2 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Javaid Contractors, Inc. C. 0. No.: Three (3) Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No 2) Consultant: Brown & Caldwell Engineers ITEM 3 - REPLACEMENT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE RAMP This item involves the cost for labor and material required to replace the reinforced concrete ramp with water stop at the west side of the existing Operations Center. Also included are the costs for notching the existing concrete for installation of the water stop. The concrete ramp was removed to repair a leaking pumped drainage pipe. This portion of the concrete ramp was not shown on the contract drawings to be demolished (Reference: PC1; Javaid PCO #26). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,480.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 CALENDAR DAYS TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $36,228.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 10 CALENDAR DAYS "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" Page 3 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER. Contractor: Javaid Contractors. Inc. C. 0. No.: Three (3) Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23.5-1 (Rebid No 2) Consultant: Brown & Caldwell Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 10 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: February 27, 1993 Original Contract Time: 365 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: February 27 ,1994 Time Extension this C.O.: 10 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 36 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 401 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: April 4, 1994 - Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 2,284,864.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 706.00 This Change (Add) Meduet) $ 36,228.00 Amended Contract Price $ 2,321,798.00 "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" Page 4 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA S2728.8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Javaid Contractors. Inc. C. O. No.: Three (3) Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) Consultant: Brown & Caldwell Encineers Board Authorization Date: March 9, 1 S94 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted/b/ye Reco mended by: x 9� �Ip- - 2- - 9- Y¢ ngineering Manager Date Co struction Manager Date Ap�p v by: Ap Quad as to F (�Cl�. l3k awe, a/9/r1 rec mil ,� Director of Engineering Date General Co nsel Date Accepted by: JAVAID ONITRACTORS, INC. Z Contractor ID e "E-4" AGENDA ITEM # 9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4" Page 1 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion Proiect, Job No. P2-42-2 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Amount of this Change Order (Aeld)(Deduct) $ (24,407,001 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - DELETION OF THICKENED WASTE ACTIVATED SLUDGE PUMPS (TWAS) The project plans and specifications require the Contractor to remove and replace the six existing TWAS pumps for DAF Thickeners A, B, and C and to provide two new pumps for the new DAF Thickener D. Prior to bid time, the Districts' maintenance staff replaced the six existing pumps with new pumps. Rather than replace the new pumps, it is more cost effective to delete six pumps from the contract and change the two new pumps for DAF Thickener D to a pump that is compatible with the existing system. This change includes material and equipment net costs only as all of the pumps will need to be removed and placed in a new location to accommodate the new piping configuration and new DAF Thickener pressurization systems in accordance with the contract documents. This item was negotiated on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 106(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference PC4-001; PCH-P2422-001)• CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S(66,089.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - EXTENSION OF HIGH PRESSURE AIR PIPING The plans call for the new high pressure air (HPA) line to be tied in with the existing system at the east end of the Scott Tunnel. Upon field verification, it was found that this 2-inch HPA line is actually 175 feet away at the intersection of Scott Tunnel and the East Secondary Sludge Pump Station (R.A.S.). This change order item provides for the installation of this pipe. This item was negotiated on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference PCL-034). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,727.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS 7-1" Page 2 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: March 9, 1994 Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion Project, Job No. P2-42-2 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 3 - CHANGE SLUICE GATE FRAME MATERIAL The project specifications call for the Contractor to provide two plastic sluice gates with an epoxy coated carbon steel fabricated frame. During the shop drawing review process, the Districts design staff re-evaluated the gates location and function and recommended that the gate frames be made of stainless steel. This change order provides for the additional shop fabrication cost of making the gate frames from stainless steel. This item was negotiated on a lump sum basis pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions (Reference Shop Drawing No. 63(A)). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,345.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4 - PLANT WATER PIPING REPLACEMENT Upon investigation, it was found that the existing galvanized main header piping system supplying plant water to the clarifiers has severely corroded and requires replacement. The contract includes the replacement of the lateral piping of the same system. The existing header piping supports will be substituted with new fiberglass supports which will match the contract-specified lateral piping support system. It was determined to be more cost effective to change the lateral piping from the specified galvanized pipe to Schedule 80 PVC. The replacement header piping will be galvanized steel pipe with a coal tar epoxy (corrosion preventative) coating. This item also includes costs to identify and protect the PVC piping from ultra-violet damage by painting the piping per Districts' standards. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $34,610.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 12 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: $(24,407.001 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 12 Calendar Days "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" Page 3 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. 80X 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: March 9, 1994 Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion Project. Job No. P2-42-2 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 12 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: June 2, 1993 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: June 1, 1995 Time Extension this C.O.: 12 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 12 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 742 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: June 13, 1995 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 14,496 000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ (54,000.00) This Change (A96) (Deduct)$ (24,407.00) Amended Contract Price $ 14,417,593.00 "F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3" Page 4 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction Inc C.O. No.: Two (2) Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion Project. Job No. P2-42-2 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Board Authorization Date: March 9, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by, p Recommended by: Ogineering Manager Da et Construction Manager Date Apt by: Ap oved as to Fo : Director of Engineering Date General Counsel 'Date Accepted by: MARGATE CONSTRUCTION, INC. Co actor ate "F-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-4'$ Page 1 of 10 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One (11 Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Priority Projects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1 Consultant: John Carollo Encineers Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduct) $ (48,807.001 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING 42-INCH VCP AT EFFLUENT JUNCTION BOX NO. 1 The Contractor was directed to abandon an existing 42-inch vitrified clay pipe not shown on the Contract Drawings adjacent to Effluent Junction Box No. 1. During installation of a excavation dewatering system to facilitate a structural addition, the Contractor drilled through the top of the abandoned 42-inch vitrified clay pipe. Districts' staff determined that it was necessary to fill the abandoned pipe with concrete prior to backfilling the excavation in order to prevent adjacent natural ground from settling and infiltrating into the pipe. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(8)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #1) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,063.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - RELOCATION OF EXISTING 6-INCH DIGESTER GAS PIPELINE AT PLANT WATER PUMP STATION AND ABANDONMENT OF EXISTING 6-INCH NATURAL GAS PIPELINE The Contractor was directed to abandon and cap an existing 6-inch natural gas pipeline and temporarily relocate an existing 6-inch digester gas pipeline around the perimeter of the excavation for the new Plant Water Pump Station bypass structure. The two existing pipelines were in conflict with the plan location of the new bypass structure and were not shown on the Contract Drawings. The work consisted of cutting both the existing 6-inch steel gas pipelines, where they entered and exited the excavation, installing new 6-inch ductile iron pipe and making new connections on the digester pipeline and removing and capping the existing natural gas pipeline. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,215.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" Page 2 of 10 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One III Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Priority Projects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 3 - REROUTE OF EXISTING 10-INCH CHLORINE SOLUTION PIPELINE AT EFFLUENT JUNCTION BOX NO. 1 The Contractor was directed to temporarily relocate an existing 10-inch chlorine solution pipeline that interfered with construction of modifications to Effluent Junction Box No. 1. The actual location of the chlorine solution pipeline was different than what was shown on the Contract Drawings and it was necessary for the Contractor to temporarily reroute the chlorine solution pipeline around the shored excavation during construction. The work consisted of furnishing and installing an additional 8 feet of Schedule 80 10-inch PVC pipe, 2-900 and 2-450 Schedule 80 fittings and removing and reinstalling the chlorine solution pipeline per the Contract Drawings upon backfill of the new structure. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #3) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,025.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4 - ELECTRICAL PULL BOX ADDITION AT EFFLUENT JUNCTION BOX NO. 1 The Contractor was directed to furnish and install a new electrical pull box adjacent to Effluent Junction Box No. 1. Installation of new gate controls required the addition of a new duct bank with five new conduits terminating into an existing electrical pull box. This existing pull box was not large enough to accept the three additional 2-inch conduits and two additional 1-inch conduits shown on the Contract Drawings. The item includes furnishing and installing a new 24-inch x 24-inch x 10-inch electrical fiberglass pull box and providing intertie conduits and wire between the existing pull box and new pull box. The new pull box was not shown on the Contract Drawings This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-602(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #4) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,176.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "G-2" AGENDA ITEM N9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" Page 3 of 10 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One If I Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Priority Projects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 5 - REMOVE ABANDONED ELECTRICAL DUCT BANK AT NEW CHLORINE ABSORPTION FACILITY The Contractor was directed to remove an existing unforeseen concrete-encased electrical duct bank that interfered with construction of the new emergency chlorine absorption facility. The existing electrical duct bank was uncovered during excavation for the new containment area and was not shown on the Contract Drawings. The additional work included breaking up, removing and disposing of the concrete-encased electrical conduits. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #5) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $924.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 6 - ABANDON EXISTING FIBERGLASS DUCT AT FERRIC CHLORIDE FACILITY The Contractor was directed to remove a portion of an abandoned 20-inch fiberglass air duct that interfered with construction of the new containment area around the existing ferric chloride facility. The existing air duct was uncovered during excavation for the new containment wall footing and was not shown on the Contract Drawings. The additional work included cutting out the interfering portion of the air duct and constructing two brick and mortar bulkheads to seal the open ends. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-602(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #6) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $297.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" Page 4 of 10 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Priority Proiects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 7 - ADDITIONAL CONCRETE PAVING WITHIN NEW SOLUTION POLYMER CONTAINMENT AREA The Contractor was directed remove an area of existing asphalt within the new solution polymer containment area and replace with new concrete paving. This section of asphalt paving was shown on the Contract Drawings to be existing concrete. The intent of the Contract Specifications was to have all new and existing concrete surfaces within the containment areas coated to protect against chemical spills. The coating specified in the Contract was not compatible with asphalt. The additional work consisted of removing approximately 60 square feet of existing asphalt, grading and cleaning the edges of the existing exposed concrete, adding waterstop around the perimeter of the removal area and repaving with 6-inch thick reinforced concrete. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10.6(8)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #7) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,932.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8 - DRAIN EXTENSION AND MISCELLANEOUS MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXISTING FERRIC CHLORIDE FACILITY The Contractor was directed to add a new 6-inch drain pipe system from the existing ferric chloride tank overflow into the new containment structure sump. The drain was added as a continuation of an existing drain which was being covered by the new containment structure concrete slab. This existing drain pipe was not shown on the Contract Drawings. Other modifications required but not shown on the Contract Drawings included repair of existing chemical damaged concrete, removal of an abandoned existing concrete ductbank, abandonment of existing flowmeter conduits below the new concrete slab, removal of an existing concrete step and caulking of an existing joint between the concrete tank pad and adjacent building. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #8) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $4,308.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "G-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-4" Page 5 of 10 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Enaineers C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Priority Projects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 9 - MODIFICATION OF NEW STRUCTURE CONNECTION AT EFFLUENT JUNCTION BOX NO. 1 The Contractor was directed to modify the structural connection between the existing structure and new weir gate addition to Effluent Junction Box No. 1. The Contract Drawings required no direct structural connection between the existing structure and the new structure addition. Districts' staff and the design engineer reevaluated the design and agreed that for added insurance reasons the integrity of the combined structure could be strengthened by being directly tied together for relatively minor extra costs. The additional work included drilling the existing structure walls and floor and installing double #5 reinforcing bar tie dowels, anchored with epoxy. These dowels were then tied directly to the new structure reinforcement prior to placement of concrete. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #9) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,977.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 1 - REMOVE UNFORESEEN CONCRETE AT NEW PLANT WATER PUMP STATION STRAINER FACILITY The Contractor was directed remove an unforeseen concrete obstruction during excavation for the concrete slab and footings to support the new strainer installation at the existing Plant Water Pump Station. The obstruction interfered with construction of the new slab and footings and was not shown on the Contract Drawings. The additional work included breaking up, removing and disposing of the mass concrete. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-602(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #10) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $470.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days 11G-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-5" Page 6 of 10 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Priority Projects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No 2. Job No. P2-43-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 11 - TEST PROBE PORT ADDITION AT THE OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION FLOW METER TEST STATION The Contractor was directed to add a port for a meter test probe at the new Ocean Outfall Booster Station flow meter test facility. The port was requested by the Districts' Instrumentation Department for use in testing portable flow meter probes and was not included in the Contract. The additional work included furnishing and installing a 42-inch diameter pipe saddle and 1 % -inch stainless steel full port ball valve. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-61B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #11) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $1,670.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 12 - CONTAINMENT AREA COATING ADDITION The Contractor was directed to apply protective coating per the Contract Specifications to all existing exposed concrete within the new polymer solution, ferric chloride and ferric chloride containment areas. The Contract Specifications required the Contractor to coat newly constructed exposed concrete and did not include coating of existing exposed concrete. Staff determined that it was the intent of the Contract to coat all exposed concrete surfaces within the containment areas, including existing concrete surfaces. The additional work included furnishing coating materials, sandblasting and coating all existing surfaces within the new polymer solution, ferric chloride and ferric chloride containment areas. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #14) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $14,015.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "G-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS 116-6" Page 7 of 10 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Priority Projects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 1 - CATWALK SUPPORT MODIFICATIONS AT THE EMULSION POLYMER CONTAINMENT AREA The Contractor was directed to modify the Sedimentation Basin "J" catwalk support due to a conflict with construction of the new emulsion polymer containment wall. This conflict was not shown on the Contract Drawings. This modification included removing the existing catwalk support, fabricating and installing a new redesigned catwalk support. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #151 ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $756.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 14 - BLEACH STORAGE TANK RESIN CHANGE The Contractor was directed to change the fiberglass resin used to construct the new bleach solution storage tank to Hetron 187P. The resin specified in the Contract Detailed Specifications was not suitable for use with hydrogen peroxide. The Districts' Operations Department required the option of using either hydrogen peroxide or bleach solution in the future for odor control. The additional work consisted of modifying the contract-specified bleach tank under fabrication at the subcontractor's shop using Hetron 187P resin. When the Contractor received direction to change the type of resin, shop drawings for the original tank had been approved and tank fabrication was partially complete. Districts' staff determined that additional costs to the project would be reduced by modifying the partially-completed tank rather than discarding the tank and fabricating a new tank. Costs associated with this item included changing the type of resin to Hetron 187P and refabrication of the partially- completed tank. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-602(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #16) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $6,425.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "G-7" AGENDA ITEM d9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-7" Page 8 of 10 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Enaineers C.O. No.: One 11) Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Priority Proiects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-43-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers ITEM 15 - DELETION OF MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING SCRUBBER TOWERS The Contractor was directed to delete modifications of the eight existing scrubber towers in the north scrubber complex and four existing scrubber towers in the south scrubber complex. The deleted work consisted of removing a section from the main body of each scrubber tower, adding a new 10-foot diameter by 30-inch high section and securing the new section in place with epoxy. Also deleted was the removal of a 30-inch high section from each existing scrubber stack in order to keep the overall elevation of the scrubber stacks equal to the original elevation. Upon verification in the field, the size of the existing scrubber towers was found to be sufficient for installation of the new contract-specified demisting sections without the modifications required by the Contract Drawings. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH No. 2) CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($76,844.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 16 - MODIFICATIONS TO ABANDONMENT OF A & B METER The Contractor was directed to modify the procedure shown on the Contract drawings for removal of the existing A & B flowmeter and abandonment of the existing meter vault and connecting diversion pipelines. Districts' and Contractor's staff determined that a cost savings to the Districts would result from installing two brick and mortar plugs inside two existing 36-inch RCP diversion pipelines, working from inside the existing upstream and downstream diversion boxes. The Contract Drawings required the Contractor to locate and excavate the two existing 36-inch RCP meter diversion pipelines outside the existing meter vault, cut and remove sections from the existing pipes and construct two reinforced concrete caps. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #17) CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($17,216.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: (548,807.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "G-8" AGENDA ITEM k9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-8" Page 9 of 10 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One (1) Date: _March 9. 1994 Job: Priority Projects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2 Job No P2-43-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: May 11, 1993 Original Contract Time: 420 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: July 4, 1994 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: No Change Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 3,398,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 0.00 This Change (A") (Deduct) $ (48,807,001 Amended Contract Price $ 3,349,193.00 "G-9" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-9" Page 10 of 10 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C.O. No.: One (1) Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Priority Proiects Elements of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Board Authorization Date: March 9, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Recommended by: gineering Manager Date C nstruction Manager Date App v /by: Appr ad as to For Ia Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date Accepted by: MLUDWIG ENGINEERS 8 94 on actor Date "G-10" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-10" Page 1 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Ziebarth and Alper and C. O. No.: Seven (7) C. S. Alper Construction Co. Inc. Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Electrification of Pumo Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No P2-42-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduet) $1,032.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - EXTENDED OVERHEAD CHARGE This item will resolve a dispute regarding costs incurred by the Contractor for District- caused delays to this work, due to the rebuild of the engine generators at Plant No. 2. The original schedule required this work to be completed soon after the start- up of the Central Power Generation facility at Plant No. 2. The damage to and repair of the engines required that replacement of old engines with motors be stopped, which severely impacted the progress of the job. Other delays issued by the Districts included a reduction from 2 to 1 in the number of Headworks pumps that could be worked on at once. This item will provide additional days for the delay from June 12, 1992 through December 8, 1993. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $20,440.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 501 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - REPROGRAM PUMP SEQUENCING This item involves reprogramming the pump sequencing programmable logic controller for Pumps 5-8; adds low level cutout devices, develops additional video screens to provide operator interface for the system, and connects flow and levels for the Plant Water Pump Station. This item is needed to prevent cavitation which can cause damage to the pumps or the capacity-controlling variable speed drives and was not shown in the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Sections 10-6(b)(2) A and 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $9,037.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" Page 2 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Ziebarth and Alper and C. 0. No.: Seven (7) C. S. Alper Construction Co.. Inc. Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Electrification of Pumo Drives at Treatment Plant No, 2. Job No. P2-42-1 Consultant: John Carollo Enoineers ITEM 3 - REMOVAL OF EXISTING ENGINE BASES The Contractor was directed to remove six engine foundations and finish the concrete in the surrounding area. The foundation left after the removal of the engines was a raised 4-inch area located in the normal operator walking level. This concrete had to be removed and finished to provide safe areas for operators and mechanics to work. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6lb)(2) of the General Provisions (See FCO #7). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $23,555.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days ITEM 4 - LIQUIDATED DAMAGES During the final field testing of the variable frequency drives (VFDs) for the new pumps and motors, ABB Industrial Systems experienced several problems and delays during the final field testing of the VFDs. The problems and corrections accounted for 26 days of delay to the completion of the job. The contract documents provide for liquidated damages of $2,000.00 per day for delay to the contract completion per Specification Section 50-8. Therefore, the Contractor is assessed 26 days of liquidated damages at $2,000.00 per day for a total of $52,000.00. These delays are not included in Items 1 through 3 above. CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S(52,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $1,032.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 503 Calendar Days "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" Page 3 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Ziebarth and Alper and C. 0. No.: Seven (7) C. S. Alper Construction Co.. Inc. Date: March 9, 1994 Job: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No P2-42-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 503 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: March 12, 1991 Original Contract Time: 480 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: July 3, 1992 Time Extension this C.O.: 503 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 525 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 1,005 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: December 10, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: 26 Calendar Days Actual Final Completion Date: January 5, 1994 Original Contract Price $ 9,369,000.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ 110.199.00 This Change (Add) (Dedaet)- $ 1 ,032.00 Amended Contract Price $_9,480,231 .00 "H-3" AGENDA ITEM #90) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3" Page 4 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Ziebarth and Alper and C. 0. No.: Seven (7) C. S. Alper Construction Co.. Inc. Date: March 9. 1994 Job: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No P2-42-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Board Authorization Date: March 9, 1994 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Recommended by: ngineenng Manager Date Cofistruction Manager Date AZ by: Ap oved as to For �s �l�1//, ,� a-7-9v Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date Accepted by: ZIEBARTH AND ALPER AND C.S. ALPER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. Q-:- aQ92A a - %-9 4 Contra or I Date "H-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-4" RESOLUTION NO. 94-33 ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-42-1 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-42-1, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper Construction Co. , Inc. , has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, on January 5, 1994; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3 . That Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2 , Job No. P2-42-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated March 12 , 1991; and, Section 4 . That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefore; and, "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper Construction Co. , Inc. , setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, _ Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 9, 1994. MA3.33 "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS °f OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270e-7018 p141 982-2e11 September 22, 1993 Boards of Directors County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation in Connection with Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13 In accordance with the District's procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the preparation of the design, construction plans and specifications in connection with Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $57,585.00. Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 161 not to exceed $41,441.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 600.00 Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 11,400.00 Fixed Profit 4,144.00 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed S57 585.0 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Is/James A. Wahner /s/Thomas M. Dawes James A. Wahner Thomas M. Dawes Chairman, District No. 6 Director of Engineering Selection Committee Selection Committee "J" AGENDA ITEM #9(J )(1) - DISTRICT 6 "J" RESOLUTION NO. 94-35-6 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 6-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ABANDONMENT OF AIRBASE TRUNK SEWERS AND CONSTRUCTION OF WATSON AVENUE SEWER AND CALIFORNIA STREET SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 6-13 x+xa++xxax++x+++x+xxa++x+xxx+x++ax WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California has heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been negotiated with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of plans and specifications for Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13; and, WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #90) (2) - DISTRICT 6 "K-1" Section 1. That the proposed Professional Services Agreement is for a project pursuant to Amendment No. 2 to the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan, approved by the District's Board of Directors on February 9, 1994. The project is to be designed as per the Master Plan amendment approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, a Mitigated Negative Declaration covering this project was approved by the District's Board of Directors on February 9, 1994; and, Section 2 . That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated March 9, 1994, by and between County Sanitation District No. 6 and Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of plans and specifications for Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Engineering Services, (direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead @ 161%) , not to exceed $41,441.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 600.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 11,400.00 Fixed Profit 4 , 144 . 00 TOTAL, not to exceed 957 . 585.00 ^K-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( i )(2) - DISTRICT 6 "K-2" Section J. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 6 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 9, 1994 . RAGIAD.035 "K-3" AGENDA ITEM #9( j ) (2) - DISTRICT 6 "K-3" RESOLUTION NO. 94-34 AWARDING JOB NOS. P1-48 . P2-47-2 . P2-56 AND P2-53-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MISCELLANEOUS ARCHITECTURAL AND TREATMENT PLANT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-48; MISCELLANEOUS WORK (RE FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 2) , JOB NO. P2-47-2, FLARE IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-56; AND SEISMIC RETROFIT OF STRUCTURES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-53-2 xxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed construction contract for Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2 is for a project which is a portion of the previously-approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989; and, Section 2 . In accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Boards of Directors, on December 8, 1993, authorized "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #13 - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" filing a Notice of Exemption in connection with the proposed project for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job P1-48; Miscellaneous Work (re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2) , Job No. P2-47-2; and Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and, Section 3 . That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work (re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2) , Job No. P2-47-2, Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4 . That the contract for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work (re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2) , Job No. P2-47-2, Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, be awarded to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount of $1,003 ,899.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #13 - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" Section 5. That the chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 9, 1994. rcag.034 "L-3" AGENDA ITEM #13 - ALL DISTRICTS "L-3" i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON FEBRUARY 9, 1994 gµiITATIpA,G J IIe' g� pggAGE C I' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES e• 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA BOLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2. 3, 5. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held an February 9, 1994, at 7:30 p.m.. in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Y_ Fred Barrens,Chairman Gene Beyer s JL Pat McGuigan, Chairman Pm am _ Thomas E. Lut, j_ James M. Ferryman Nate Reade Thomas R.Saltarelli Lines Pont... Z Roger Stanton William G.Steiner i OIS1111CT M0.2: L John Collins. ChairmanTo.GschgeD Scott Iry FiSW_ Ier, Chairman anpro tam Tom Da ly ,I _ Fred Berens _ Gene Beyer • _ Buck Catlin i_ gam Done Bob e —_ Bob Sell L Nornan Z. Eckemode Michael Maedoweter Wiliam D. Mahoney James H.Flare L Carney J. Nelson Glenn Parker _ Miguel Pulido Themes E.Lunt y_ Roger Stanton William G. Steiner • Daniel T.Vishnu John M.Gulfimson Z_ George L Vaud Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO.3: 3_ Sal A. Sapien,Chairman Wiliam C.Estrada _L theme DVNap. Chairman pro ter Camay J.Nelson i_ George Brown _ Gwen A. Forsythe Buck Catlin Cba Norby John Collins George Scott i. James H.Flora Wiliam D.Mahoney L Don R.Griffin Donald Bone Wally Li. Eva G.Miner a Thomas E.Luv Pat McGuigan Linda MoultanY tterson Earle Bobitaille Z Rchsre Pari Joyce C.Nicholson y Inn Fickler Tom Daly • Margie L. Rice James V. Evam y_ Sheldon Singer George L. Zlaket L Roger Stanton Wiliam G. Steiner Charles SyWia Anthony Selvaggi DISTRICT NO. 5: John C.Cox.Jr.,Chairman Jan Debay Phil Sansone. Chairman pro ter Jan Deb, William G. Steiner Roper Stamon DISTRICT NO.6: �_ James A.Wester,Chairman Arthur Perry &el,Hart.Charms en pro tern John C.Cos,Jr.William G. Steiner Roger Stamen DISTRICT NO.7: L Barry Hammond,Chairman Mike Ward James A.Webner, Chairman pro tem Mike Scheafer Z Fred Barrens Gene Beyer Jan Deasy Phil Sansone Ted MDneM Miguel PWWo i. Charles E Puckett Thomas R. Saltandli L William G. Stainer Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: Grace Wdotell, Chairman Earle Robiti ille i_ Victor Leiprig, Chedd an we tern Linda Moulton-Patterson y_ Roper Stanton _ William G. Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: Z Jehn M.Gulliason,Chairman Daniel T.Welch Z Fred Rarem. Chairman pre tem Gana Bayer Glenn Parker _� Sunda Dunlap Iry Fickler Tom Daly y_ William G. Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.14: Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller Leslie Pandous, Choirmsn pro tem Charles E Puckett Fred Sellers Gene Beyer x Barry Hammond Mike Ward Wiliam G. Steiner Roger Stamen -2- 02/09/94 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Scott Archibald, Carl E. Beach, Catherine Biele, Mike Broyles, Chris Cervellone, Corinne Clawson, Bernie DeAnda, John Finias, Gary Hasenstab, Cindy Handy, Roy Handy, Ed Hodges, Larry Lazorek, Curtis Mason, William Moline, Kent C. Nelson, Karl Nordgren, Bob Oaten, William Pierce, L. Ellen Ray, Rudy Reyes, Mary Simpson, Jim Tintle, Jack Vincent, Mike Wilson, Ray Young, Victor Zorzynski OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Bill Fleming, Bill Knopf, Phil Stone DISTRICTS 1 , 2 & 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpts re Board Appointments That the minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors, appointment of alternate Directors and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: ('Mayor) City/Agency District Active Director Alternate Director Santa Ana 1 Patricia McGuigan Thomas E. Lutz 3 Thomas E. Lutz Patricia McGuigan Fullerton 2 & 3 A. B. "Buck" Catlin' Chris Norby Placentia 3 Norman Z. Eckenrode• Michael Maertzweiler Stanton 3 Sal A. Sapiens William C. Estrada DISTRICTS 2 & 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive. file and accept resignation of Mayor David M. Cheverton of the That the letter from Mayor David M. Cheverton City of La Habra and seating first and of the City of La Habra resigning from the second alternates to the mayor Boards of Directors of District Nos. 2 and 3, be and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the following first and second alternates to the mayor be seated as members of the Boards: District Active Director Alternate Director 2 William D. Mahoney James H. Flora 3 James H. Flora William D. Mahoney -3- 02/09/94 DISTRICT 1 The Joint Chairman announced that the Election of Chairman and Chairman office of Chairman of County Sanitation pro tern District No. 1 had been vacated by a change in Board representation and that election of a new Chairman would, therefore, be in order. Director Fred Barrera was then duly nominated and elected Chairman of District No. 1. Joint Chairman Mahoney then reported that the election of Director Barrera as Chairman of District No. 1 created a vacancy in the post of Chairman pro tem and declared nominations in order to fill the vacant position. Director Pat McGuigan was then duly nominated and elected Chairman pro tem of District No. 1 . ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that Adootion of resolution of Director Robert Richardson was retiring from appreciation for retiring Director the Board. He then introduced a resolution expressing the Boards' appreciation to Director Richardson. It was moved, seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-31, expressing appreciation to retiring Director Robert Richardson for his outstanding contributions and dedication to public service. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Joint Chairman Mahoney added that a plaque was being prepared and would be formally presented along with the resolution at a later date. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed newly-seated Presentation of District pin to Director Pat McGuigan, who is representing new Director the City of Santa Ana to the Boards. He then presented her with a pin bearing the Districts' new "2020 VISION" Wastewater Management Action Plan logo. -4- 02/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman briefly reviewed the Presentation of PRIDE Awards to Districts' PRIDE program which rewards emolovees employees for creative suggestions with an economic or safety benefit to the Districts. He reported that at its last meeting, the Fiscal Policy Committee approved five PRIDE cost-saving or safety suggestion awards to employees totaling $1,900.00. Chairman Mahoney then asked Bob Ooten, Assistant Director Of Operations, to come forward and assist in the presentation of the maximum award amount of $1,500.00 to employee Victor Zorzynski. Mr. Ooten reported that Victor Zorzynski's suggestion to avoid equipment shut down by installing a hot water loop bypass valve, is estimated to save the Districts approximately $15,000 annually. The Joint Chairman commended the employee for his PRIDE suggestion and presented Mr. Zorzynski with his $1,500.00 cash award and certificate of appreciation. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the Report of the Joint Chairman tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, February 16th, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, February 23rd, at 5:30 p.m. (Directors George L. Zlaket and George Brown were also invited to attend.) ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that there Report of the General Manager was no new information regarding the previously reported accident at Plant No. 2 in which two construction contractor's workers regretfully died. Investigations are continuing into the cause of the accident at Plant No. 2 and will not be completed for several weeks. He advised that the Directors would be updated once there is more definitive information. The General Manager also stated that a New Directors' Orientation and Treatment Plant Tour would be scheduled in the near future now that the Boards' reorganization has been completed. All Directors are invited and encouraged to attend. He stated that information would be mailed in the next week or so. -5- 02/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel referred the Directors Report of the General Counsel to a memorandum included in their folders that evening regarding LAFCO procedures and reorganization wherein special districts will now have two seats on the LAFCO Commission. The purpose of the memorandum was for the Directors' information only. i Mr. Woodruff then briefly commented on the 1993 Amendments to the Ralph M. Brown Act that will become effective April 1, 1994. He reported that an opinion issued by his office as it applies to the Districts will soon be mailed to the Directors. He then briefly mentioned there was a supplemental agenda item for District 7 Directors regarding litigation on a sewer backup. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -6- 02/09/94 DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered ' that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 01/12/94 01/26/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund . $582,329.23 $752,456.67 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 366,219.39 2,238,867.31 Joint Working Capital Fund - 263,692.16 497,711.48 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,726.28 16,196.82 DISTRICT N0. 1 - 235.72 950.64 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 7,155.19 25,816.17 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 26,235.49 23,098.18 DISTRICT N0. 5 - 5,497.65 3,272.12 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 12.73 867.90 DISTRICT N0. 7 - 98,811.11 22,948.35 DISTRICT N0. 11 - 8,995.25 11,859.79 DISTRICT N0. 13 - 0.00 34.90 DISTRICT N0. 14 - 1,433.94 788.82 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT 58,769.42 6,137.12 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,438.74 2,110.86 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 6,109.04 7,162.59 51.440.661.34 $3,610,279.72 -7- 02/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to the Biofiltration Demonstration Project Authorizina staff to issue Chance Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 64274 issued to Calscience Environmental Laboratories, Inc. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 64274 issued to Calscience Environmental Laboratories, Inc., for performing analysis of air samples and providing for additional testing as identified by staff in the amount of $18,000, increasing the total authorized amount from an amount not to exceed $10,000 to an amount not to exceed $28,000. Authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 64272 issued to AtmAA. Inc. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 64272 issued to AtmAA, Inc., for performing analysis of air samples and providing for additional testing as identified by staff in the amount of $41,000, increasing the total authorized amount from an amount not to exceed $25,000 to an amount not to exceed $66,000. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoorovina Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and No. P1-38-2 specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2, authorizing an addition of $9,167.00 to the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for three items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. -8- 02/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and No P2-53-1 specifications for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1, authorizing a _ deduction of $30,000.00 from the contract with Amelco Construction, A Division of Amelco Industries, for deletion of contractor's "All Risk" insurance requirement to be covered under the Districts' master course of construction policy at a savings, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approvina reallocation of appr ved actions re compliance with new That reallocation of approved costs of SCAQMD Rule 1179 re Publicly actions re compliance with new South Coast Owned Treatment Works Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1179 re Publicly Owned Treatment Works, originally authorized by the Boards on February 19, 1992, be, and is hereby approved as follows: Orlainal Revisgul Description Authorization Reallocation Authorization JEIP Participation payable to County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County $280,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $360,000.00 Special Consultant work for Districts Site Specific Work $190,000.00 < 80,000.00 > $110,000.00 Districts' In-House Force Account Costs $200,000.00 -.0 $200.000.00 TOTALS SQ70.000.00 -L0 5670.000.00 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizina staff to issue Chance Order No. 1 to Purchase Order That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to No. 64943 issued to Matrix Service. issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order Inc. re Emergency Repairs to Plant No. 64943, issued to Matrix Service, Inc. No. 2 Low Pressure Gas Holder increasing the total authorized amount from (Specification No. R-042) an amount not to exceed $51,082.00, plus applicable sales tax, to an amount not to exceed $68,532.00, plus applicable sales tax, an increase of $17,450.00, in connection with Emergency Repairs to Plant No. 2 Low Pressure Gas Holder (Specification No. R-042). -9- 02/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committee Committee and Executive Committee meetings held on January 19, 1994 and January 26, 1994, respectively, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. e ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizina staff to issue a purchase order to KPMG Peat Marwick to That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to conduct an extended review of the issue a purchase order to KPMG Peat Districts' internal accounting controls Marwick to conduct an extended review of the Districts' internal accounting controls in accordance with their proposal dated November 10, 1993, for an amount not to exceed $25,000. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoorovino renewal of certain insurance coverages That renewal of certain insurance coverages effective March 1, 1994, be, and is hereby, approved as follows: Annual Insurance coverage Umite Premium Carrier Boiler& Machinery $100.000,000 par Occurrence $84,544 American Manufacturer a 25,000,000 Earthquake Fidelity&Honesty $2.000,000 Fidelity. Honesty& 4 3,706 Hartford Ina. Co. Computer Fraud $1,000,000 Depositor Forgery 964 $4�70 Excess Workers'Comp Statutory Benefits $36,928 National Union Q $6,000.000 Employee Liability 1,420 JPA if lees cosily 83 *Robert F. Driver Co. is in the process of finalizing a JPA for local agencies for Excess Workers'Compensation Insurance. If this JPA is established with carriers that meet the Districts'criteria, and the total premiums or rates are lower than those proposed by National Union, participation in the JPA is authorized. _10_ 02/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Avorovina Third Amended Joint Powers Agreement Confirming the That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Creation of an Agency Known as the Resolution No. 94-15, approving Third Southern California Coastal Water Amended Joint Powers Agreement Research Project Authority Confirming the Creation of an Agency (SCCWRPA) Known as the Southern California Coastal � Water Research Project Authority ' (SCCWRPA), providing for continuation of SCCWRPA for three years, from July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1997. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve the written report of the Special Joint Works That the written report of the Special Joint Selection Committee re Computers Works Selection Committee re Computers meeting held on January 27, 1994, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Deloitte & Touche for That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Selection of a New Financial Resolution No. 94-16, approving Information System. Specification Professional Services Agreement with No. S-072 Deloitte & Touche for Selection of a New Financial Information System, Specification No. S-072, on an hourly-rate basis including labor, overhead, direct expenses and profit, plus out-of-pocket costs, for an amount not to exceed $150,000.00 for Phase I, Detailed Needs Assessment, and Phase ll, Develop Specifications for a Formal RFP. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Receive and file Reoort of the Special Committee to Study Joint Chairman's Compensation Verbal report by Chairman The Joint Chairman recognized Director Buck Catlin, Chairman of the Special Committee to Study Joint Chairman's Compensation, and requested a verbal report. Director Catlin stated that the 13 member committee was a well-balanced mix of both new and older Directors with good participation. Input was also received from other Directors. The Committee discussed four possibilities: _11_ 02/09/94 1. The current policy, which provides for each District to compensate the Joint Chairman $100 (the maximum allowable) for presiding over a jointly held meeting of the Joint Administrative Organization. 2. Do not compensate the Joint Chairman any additional amount over and above the $100 per meeting which he/she receives from the District he/she represents. 3. Establish additional compensation for the Joint Chairman somewhere between $100 W above) and $0 (#2 above) to be paid by each District for presiding over a jointly held meeting. 4. Attempt to change the existing State law to provide some other means of compensating the Joint Chairman to recognize the additional duties of the office. There was a strong consensus that the present policy be retained and that the resolution elaborate on the inordinate amount of extra work that the Joint Chairman puts in, generally in excess of 40 hours per month. It was also felt that the Vice Joint Chairman's pay should be limited to $100 maximum per meeting for that day when he serves in the Joint Chairman's absence unless he must stand in for the Joint Chairman for the entire month. He stated that the policy is fair and recommended that the Boards approve the Committee's recommendations. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written report of the Special Committee to Study Joint Chairman's Compensation meeting held on January 5, 1994, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Adopting Resolutions Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for Directors. and Repealing Prior Resolutions DISTRICT NO. 1 It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors of District No. 1 hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-21-1, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-152-1 . Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -12- 02/09/94 Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. DISTRICT NO, 2 It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors of District No. 2 hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-22-2, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-153-2. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director William Mahoney requested that his abstention from voting on the matter be made a matter of record. Directors Roger R. Stanton and Norman Z. Eckenrode requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. DISTRICT NO. 3 It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors of District No. 3 hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-23-3, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-154-3. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Directors Roger R. Stanton, Burnie Dunlap and Margie Rice requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. DISTRICT NO. 5 It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors of District No. 5 hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-24-5, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-155-5. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director William G. Steiner requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. DISTRICT NO, 6 It was moved that the Board of Directors of District No. 6 adopt Resolution No. 94-25-6, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-156-6. The motion failed for lack of a second. -13- 02/09/94 DISTRICT NO. 7 It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors of District No. 7 adopt Resolution No. 94-26-7, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-157-7. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Puckett requested that his abstention from voting on this matter be made a matter of record. Directors Ted Moreno and William G. Steiner requested that their opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. DISTRICT NO. 11 It was moved that the Board of Directors of District No. 11 adopt Resolution No. 94-27-11, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-158-11 . The motion failed for lack of a second. DISTRICT NO. 13 It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors of District No. 13 adopt Resolution No. 94-28-13, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-159-13. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director William G. Steiner requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. . DISTRICT NO. 14 It was moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors of District No. 14 adopt Resolution No. 94-29-14, Establishing Compensation and Reimbursement Policies for Directors, and Repealing Resolution No. 86-160-14. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director William G. Steiner requested that his opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. -14- 02/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Central Power Generation _ System at Plant No. 1. Job That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt No. J-19-1 , as complete Resolution No. 94-17, accepting Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, ' Job No. J-19-1 , as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors General Counsel's Comments Prior to the need for a closed session as authorized Closed Session by Government Code Section 54957.6 to review: 1) The Board met in closed session with the Districts' designated representatives regarding the salaries, benefits and terms of employment of the Districts' employees and to provide instructions to said representatives. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 The Boards convened in closed session at 8:00 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:31 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. -15- 02/09/94 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:31 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Actions re Santa Ana River Interceptor, Contract No. 2-31 and Contract No. 2-14-5R2 Receive and file Project Report prepared by Willdan Associates re Contract No. 2-31 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Project Report prepared by Willdan Associates, dated December 1992, on the Santa Ana River Interceptor Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-31, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for the preparation of a proiect report for Contract No. 2-14-5R2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Selection Committee be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for the preparation of a project report for the Santa Ana River Interceptor Manhole Erosion Protection and Access Roads, Contract No. 2-14-5R2. -16- 02/09/94 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aporovina Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee certification Post. Buckley. Schuh & Jernigan. Inc. of the final negotiated fee for design and for design and construction support construction support services for services re Contract No. 2-9-R1 Rehabilitation of Cypress Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, from Imperial Highway West of Kraemer Boulevard to the Intersection of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Associated Road, Contract No. 2-9-Rt, providing for a name change to Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc., additional design services for sewer realignment in Bastanchury Road and a reallocation of authorized funds between categories, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-18-2, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan, Inc. for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $15,798.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $119,524.00 to an amount not to exceed $135,322.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:31 p.m. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aporovina Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee certification Corporation for preparation of a of the final negotiated fee relative to the oroiect report, design and Professional Services Agreement with Boyle construction support services for Engineering Corporation for preparation of a Contract No. 3-38 project report, design and construction support services required for Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System, Contract No. 3-38, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-19-3, approving said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses and fixed profit for a total amount not to exceed $289,946.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -17- 02/09/94 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:31 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chance Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and No. 5-36 specifications for Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, authorizing a net deduction of $25,893.00 from the contract with Schuler Engineering Corporation for six items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 46 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:31 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: AAdiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:31 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:31 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:31 p.m. -18- 02/09/94 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file reauest for annexation and authorizina initiation That the petition from Sharon Coates and of proceedings re proposed Thomas Young requesting annexation of Annexation No. 145 - TRC .942 acres of territory to the District, in the Annexation vicinity northwest of Overhill Drive and Deer Haven Drive in unincorporated County territory, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-20-7, authorizing initiation of proceedings to annex said territory to the District (proposed Annexation No. 145 - TRC Annexation to District No. 7). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint for Damages. Margaret M. Holm vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Orange County Superior Court. Case No. 718128 Authorizing consideration of Supplemental Aaenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint for Damages. Margaret M. Holm vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Orange County Superior Court, Case No, 718128 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of a supplemental agenda item relative to Summons and Complaint for Damages, Margaret M. Holm vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 718128, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. _19_ 02/09/94 Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Damaaes. Margaret M. Holm vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange : County. Orange County Superior Court. Case No, 718128 General Counsel's report The General Counsel stated that the Summons and Complaint was in reference to a sewer backup in the north Tustin area a few months ago. At this particular location he reported that two prior claims had been received by the Districts from a prior property owner. The property is located downgrade of the street and the prior owner had been advised by Mr. Woodruff and Districts' staff to install a backflow device within the owner's private sewer lateral line. The owner failed to do so. Whenever there is excess water in the sewer, it has a tendency to go down and back up at this particular location. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Summons and Complaint for Damages, Margaret M. Holm vs. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 718128, relative to sewer back-up damage, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:37 p.m. -20- 02/09/94 DISTRICT 6 Actions relative to the Mitigated Negative Declaration re Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13 Open Public Hearing ' The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:33 p.m. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated January 12, 1994 re Mitigated Negative Declaration for Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file written comments Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the following written comments, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed: Costa Mesa Sanitary District November 29, 1993 Mesa Consolidated Water District December 9, 1993 City of Costa Mesa December 12, 1993 City of Santa Ana December 12, 1993 Orange County EMA December 29, 1993 Close hearing There being no further comments, the Chairman then declared the hearing closed at 8:34 p.m. Approving Mitigated Negative Declaration and authorizing filing of a Notice of Determination re Contract No. 6-13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-30-6, approving the Mitigated Negative Declaration and authorizing filing of a Notice of Determination relative to the Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -21- 02/09/94 Aoorovino Amendment No. 2 to the 1989 Master Plan for Collection. Treatment and Disposal Facilities incoroorating Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers North of Baker Street and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer. Contract No. 6-13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Amendment No. 2 to the 1989 Master Plan for Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities incorporating Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers North of Baker Street and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Journment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:35 p.m. Assistant Secr ry of Boards of Directors of County Sam tion 99tricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -P4- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 110594 PAGE 1 , REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 111294 POSTING DATE 1112M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 134952 AG TECH COMPANY $61,505.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.0.91 134953 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $220.94 LAB SUPPLIES 134954 ALADDIN HOUSE $32.33 WINDOW BLINDS 134955 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1.435.89 MECHANICAL PARTS 134956 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC. $93.97 PUBLICATION 134957 AMERSKAM CORP. $678.83 LAB SUPPLIES 134958 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $140.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 134959 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $953.31 NOTICES&ADS 134960 APPLIED SIOSCIENCE $2,689.37 LAB SUPPLIES 134961 ABC LABORATORIES $2.040.00 LAB SERVICES 134962 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP. $83.68 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 134963 BRW SAFETY&SUPPLY $2,567.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1349M BANANA BLUEPRINT $5,806.88 PRINTING M.0.10-10-90 134965 BAUER COMPRESSOR $260.19 COMPRESSOR PARTS TUNS BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $5,260.91 LAB SUPPLIES I U967 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $649.81 LAB EQUIPMENT IM968 SIOSAFETY SYSTEMS.INC. $163.35 LAB SUPPLIES 134969 BISHOP COMPANY $230.04 TOOLS M 134970 BLACK&VEATCH $36,077.81 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146 X 134971 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4,832.59 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.0.4-14-93 .�. 134972 BON-A-RUES $453.53 TRUCK PARTS DO 134973 BORNEMANN PUMPS.INC. S3,515.56 PUMP PARTS 134974 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $6,420.43 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7.18 134975 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC.,INC. $9,547.46 GENERATORS D 134976 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $940.20 SUBSCRIPTION 134977 CHUM HILL $28.848.16 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 ~ 134978 C.P.I. $488.42 LAB SUPPLIES 134979 CS COMPANY $17.238.19 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 134980 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO.,INC. $350.88 CHEMICALS 134981 CALIF ASSOC.OF SAN.AGENCIES $1.200.00 WORK CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 134982 CALIFORNIA CIRCUITS ASSOC $260.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES IU983 CALIFORNIA DOLLY&SUPPLY $426.72 BOXES 134984 CALIF.ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS $1.223.49 MECHANICAL PARTS 134985 CALSCIENCE ENVIRONMENTAL LABS $4.730.00 LAB SERVICES 134986 JOHN CARDLLO ENGINEERS $90,018.63 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38,J-33 I U987 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $3.468.54 SAFETY SUPPLIES IU988 CETAC TECHNOLOGIES.INC. $51.67 LAB SUPPLIES 134989 CHROME CRANKSHAFT,INC. $1,050.00 PUMP PARTS 134990 CITY OFFICE FURNITURE,INC. $381.30 OFFICE FURNITURE 134991 CLARK CONSULTANTS $1,105.00 ELECTRICAL CONSULTING 134992 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $45.56 SERVICE AGREEMENT 134993 COASTALMOTION $15B4.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES 134994 COCA COLA FOODS DIVISION $90,466.69 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 134995 COUCH&SONS $52.821.00 CONSTRUCTION 1-9 134996 COMPUSA,INC. 13.315.86 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 134997 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $207.98 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE VD5194 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID V12/94 POSTING DATE 1/12,94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 134998 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2.239.29 ELECTRIC PARTS 134999 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $766.03 TOOLS 1350DO CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES $300.00 INSTRUMENT SERVICES 135001 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $5,543.54 CONSULTING SERVICES M.O.7-17-91 135002 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $2.545.15 CENTRAL GEN.ENGINE PARTS 135003 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $137.80 TRUCK PARTS 135004 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $16.48 ELECTRIC PARTS 135005 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $76.66 1992-93 SALES TAX 135006 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION $257.98 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEE 135007 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL $590.05 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK OVERSIGHT PROG. 135008 DAPPER TIRE $927.76 TIRES 135009 PETER C.DAVID CO. $06,232.15 CONSTRUCTION 7-20 135010 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 135011 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $3.703.28 VALVES 135012 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $4.606.98 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O B-11-93 135013 DIFILIPPOASSOCIATES $334.24 PRINTING 135014 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $758.95 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 135015 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $159.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES m 135016 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $816.50 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL X 135017 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $4.312.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE&REPAIRS 135018 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $820.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE Lb 135019 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $5.400.00 PERSONNEL INSURANCE CONSULTANT 135020 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $165.91 PAINT SUPPLIES 135021 D'VALS SALES $43.75 FITTINGS D 135022 ESP NORTH $1.333.60 MACHINE PARTS 135023 EASTMAN.INC. $7.914.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES N 135024 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $2,490.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135025 ELECTRO ENERGY CORP. $3,280.00 ELECTRICAL TESTING SERVICES 135026 ENCHANTER,INC. $4,480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10.92 135D27 ENTECH LAB AUTOMATION $379.23 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135028 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $851.20 LAB SERVICES 135029 ESSENCE GROUP $1.365.49 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 135030 CHARLES EVANS B ASSOC 536,025.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-CENT GEN AGRMT. 135031 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $270.75 AIR FREIGHT 135032 FERRELLGAS $83.10 PROPANE 135033 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1,384.26 FILTERS 135034 FIRST COMPANY $256.45 JANITORVIL SUPPLIES 135035 FISCHER 8 PORTER CO. $99.95 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 135036 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $149.22 LAB SUPPLIES 135037 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $233.60 PHOTO SUPPLIES 135038 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $578.63 PAINT SUPPLIES 135039 THE FOXBORO CO. $2.728.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135040 FRANKLIN QUEST CO. $263.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135041 FURON DEKORON $332.95 CABLE 135042 GST,INC. $8,311.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135043 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $2,375.89 CHEMICALS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1105/94 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1/12194 POSTING DATE 1112194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135044 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $202.11 ELECTRIC PARTS 135045 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $1,544.38 TELEPHONE SERVICES 135046 GENE TRAK SYSTEMS $711.30 LAB SUPPLIES 135047 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $1.421.71 PUMP PARTS 135048 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $112.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136049 GRASBY S.T.I. $W5.22 CENTRAL GENERATION PARTS 135050 DGA CONSULTANTS $3.120.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 135051 HACH COMPANY $2.574.04 LAB SUPPLIES 135052 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $725.52 VALVE PARTS 136053 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $825.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 135054 PL HAWN CO,INC. $4.244.46 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 135055 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. 135056 HERTZ EQUIPMENT RENTAL $116.54 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 135057 HILTI,INC. $1,508.71 TOOLS 13MM HI STANDARDAUTOMOTNE $903.72 TRUCK PARTS 135059 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $497.91 COMPRESSOR PARTS 135050 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO 92,407.46 LAB SUPPLIES fn 135061 HOGG B DAVIS,INC. $22.465.89 UTILITY TRAILERS X 135062 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $27.585.80 ENGINEERING SERVICES PlJ = 135063 HOME DEPOT $298.73 HARDWARE 135054 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $944A0 PAINT SUPPLIES 13SMS CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $18,195.00 WATER USE 135066 HUNTS FINAL PHASE $990.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES n 135067 IRD MECHANALYSIS $780.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS I 135068 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $29,835.29 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11.18.92 W 135009 INDUSTRIAL BANK OF JAPAN $1.31ll.22 COP LETTER OF CREDIT 135070 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFG. $2.632.74 FILTER 135071 INDUSTRIAL STEAM $3,400.00 PUMP 135072 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $651.62 CONNECTORS 135073 INVITROGEN $149.69 LAB SUPPLIES 135074 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $4.90 WATER USE 135075 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $705.27 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 135076 JAYS CATERING $110.39 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 135077 JENSEN TOOLS,INC. $134.06 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 135078 JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $25,00 TRUCK REPAIRS 135079 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $167.50 ELECTRIC PARTS 135080 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $1,989,32 CHEMICALS 135081 KAMAN BEARINGS 8 SUPPLY $91.94 MACHINE SUPPLIES 135082 THE KEITH COMPANIES $315,00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-36R 135053 KELLY PAPER $4121 PRINTING 135084 KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP. $4.948.31 WORKBENCH 135085 KING BEARING,INC. $?233.02 MACHINE SUPPLIES 135086 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $4,871.79 TOOLS 136087 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $2,232.50 CONNECTION FEE REFUND 135088 LA MOTTE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS $99.24 CHEMICALS 135089 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $24.48 SAFETY SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/05/94 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1/12/94 POSTING DATE 1/12/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135090 LEGI-TECH $320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 135091 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGR. $28.480.53 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1.40.2 135092 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $970.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 135D93 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $490.17 LAB SUPPLIES 135094 MPS $116.14 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 135095 MACOMCO $1.022.36 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135096 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS,INC. $2,404.44 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 135097 MANDIC MOTORS $35.00 TOWING SERVICES 135098 MANTEK $551.09 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 135099 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $36.04 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135100 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $124.87 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 135101 D A MATTHEWS B ASSOC. $1,420.75 TOOLS 135102 MICROAGE OF CERRITOS $5,148.51 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135103 MICROBIAL INSIGHTS,INC. $749.97 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.11-18.92 135104 MIDWAY MFG.B MACHINING $1.280.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 135105 MIDWEST TROPHY $56.09 EPA AWARD 135106 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.452.40 UNIFORM RENTALS 136107 MOBILE HOSE AND HYDRAULIC $69.45 PUMP PARTS m 135108 MOLECULAR PROBES,INC. $452.00 LAB SUPPLIES Z 135109 MONTROY SUPPLY CO. $87.69 SIGNS 135110 MOTOROLA,INC. $1.232.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS py 135111 NASCO WEST,INC. $151.55 LAB SUPPLIES 135112 NATIONAL RENT A FENCE CO. $540.20 FENCING RENTAL 135113 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 3:. /05114 RORY NELSON $13,500.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 135115 CM OF NEWPORT BEACH $15.65 WATER USE 'C 135115 CRY OF NEWPORT BEACH $1,913.11 EMERGENCY MANHOLE REPAIRS 135117 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $158.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS 13611$ OCCUPATIONAL VISION SYSTEMS $694.08 SAFETY GLASSES 135119 DX SYSTEMS CO. $5,771.23 CHLORINE M.O.11-18-92 136120 OLYMPIC CREATIONS $1.545.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135121 OPERATION TECHNOLOGY,INC. $3.397.68 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135122 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $288.15 TRUCK PARTS 135123 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $123.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135124 ORANGE COURIER $133.50 COURIER SERVICES 135125 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $994.69 FITTINGS 136120 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,898.41 SPECIALTY GASES 135127 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $1.500.00 DEFERRED COMP TAXES 135128 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $10,357.73 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 135129 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT $32,325.00 GAP WATER USE 135130 PGC SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION 565.52 LAB SUPPLIES 135131 PACIFIC PARTS $1.039.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135132 PACIFIC PNEUMATICS,INC. $110.98 FILTER 135133 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. 528.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135134 PACIFIC BELL $198.73 TELEPHONE SERVICES 135135 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $7,734.00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/05194 PAGE 05 , REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1H2F31 POSTING DATE 1112190 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135136 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $6.343.07 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 135137 PAGENET $146.36 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 135130 PALMIERI.TYLER,WIENER, $296.01 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 135139 PARAGON CABLE $35.78 CABLE SERVICES 135140 PARTS UNLIMITED $120.34 TRUCK PARTS 135141 PENHALL COMPANY 5574.00 CONCRETE REMOVAL 135142 PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS,INC. $52.037.57 CHEMICALS 135143 PETROOUIP $115.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1351" PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $173,677.08 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 135145 POLYPURE,INC. $16,832.02 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.}11.92 135146 POSTAGE BY PHONE 55,000.00 POSTAGE 135147 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO. 5770.44 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 135148 CONTROL CONCEPTS $34124 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 135149 PREMIER STEEL $377.13 METAL 135150 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $105.00 ICE 135151 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $555.17 SOIL TESTING 135152 PUMP ENGINEERING $505.12 PUMP PARTS fT 136153 OUESTRON CORP. 5446.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135154 RJE INTERNATIONAL $255.00 LAB REPAIRS Z 135155 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $946.99 ELECTRIC PARTS 135156 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1.682.71 TRASH REMOVAL 135157 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $4.367.51 LAB SUPPLIES -1 135158 DR.SHIVAJI RAMALINGAM $324.50 LAB SUPPLIES n 135159 RED WING SHOES $238.78 SAFETY SHOES I 135160 THE REGISTER $1.457.59 NOTICES 8 ADS Vl 135161 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1,110.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135162 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT.CORP. $1.170.21 LAB SUPPLIES 135163 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $170.09 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135164 SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS $17.073.65 LAB SUPPLIES 135165 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $196.09 SPECIALTY GASES 135156 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS.INC. $139.00 LAB REPAIRS 135157 SENSUS TECHNOLOGIES 5577.01 METER 135168 SEVEN-UP BOTTLING CO. $36.479.18 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 135159 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $4.623.50 TOOLS 135170 SHURELUCK SALES 57,695.15 T0OLS01ARDWARE 135171 SMITH-EMERY CO. 5678.00 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 135172 SMITH PIPE 8 SUPPLY $242.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135173 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $702.21 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135174 SOFFA ELECTRIC,INC. $1.275.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135175 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $175.00 PERMIT FEES 135176 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. $79.727.40 POWER 135177 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $146.00 POWER METER 135178 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $22,822.72 NATURAL GAS 135179 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $16.276.00 DIESEWNLEADED FUEL 135180 SOUTH SHORE WINDOW MAINT. $2.003.34 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 135161 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $13.50 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE U05194 PAGE O6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1112194 POSTING DATE V12194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT - 135182 WESTALLOY,INC. $225.41 WELDING SUPPLIES 135183 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $2.444.41 LAB SUPPLIES 135184 SPRINGER-VERLAG $549.84 LAB SUPPLIES 135185 GARY G.STREED $5,939.96 REIMB.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL 135186 SUNSETFORD $369.25 TRUCK PARTS 135187 JOHN SWINDLER $285.22 VEHICLE DAMAGE 135188 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $872.12 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 135189 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL $280.55 MACHINE REPAIRS 135190 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $1,073.45 MECHANICAL PARTS 135191 TODD ENTERPRISES $1,304.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135192 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. $980.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135193 TONY'S LOCK B SAFE SERVICE $1,171.96 LOCKS&KEYS 135194 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO. $4.555.91 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.1.1192 135195 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $46.33 TRUCK PARTS 1351% TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $666.58 TRUCK PARTS 135197 TRUESDAIL LABS $846.D0 LAB SERVICES 135198 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $573.98 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135199 TUSTIN DODGE 525.00 TRUCK PARTS X 135200 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $353.00 LAB SUPPLIES = 135201 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $561.0 PARCEL SERVICES t 135202 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2,215.02 LAB SUPPLIES 135203 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $991.14 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135204 VERNE'S PLUMBING $1.746.22 PLUMBING SERVICES n 136205 VILLAGE NURSERIES $315.00 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 1 135206 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $10,166.43 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 135207 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $139.00 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 135208 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL $47.79 TRUCK PARTS 135209 CITY OF WESTMINSTER $1.603.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING 135210 WHESSOE VAREC $1.494.74 VALVES 135211 XEROX CORP. $4,741.62 COPIER LEASES 135212 RICHARD YOUNG PRODUCTS $568.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 01112(94 $1,440,661.34 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATEIlM4 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11112194 POSTING DATE 1112/94 SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPER FUND $235.72 02 OPER FUND 4,78847 92 CAP PAC FUND 2,386.78 #3 OPER FUND 25,907.71 #3 CAP FAC FUND 327.78 05 OPER FUND 4,746.48 05 CAP FAC FUND 751.17 #6 OPER FUND 12.73 #7 OPER FUND 4,156.53 07 CAP FAC FUND 94,652.58 #11 OPER FUND 7.095.25 #11 CAP FAC FUND 1,900.00 #14 CAP FAC FUND 1,433.94 #588 OPER FUND 903.33 05&6 CAP FAC FUND 57.866.09 rn #687 OPER FUND 2,438.74 X #7814OPERFUND 6,109.04 2 n-i JT OPER FUND 366.219.23 39 CORF 312,720.28 r--i SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 12,728.28 n JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 263.892.18 V $1,440,881.34 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/1Sf94 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1/26/94 POSTING DATE 1126194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 135246 AG TECH COMPANY $55.005.45 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9.91 135247 AT&T $2.344.90 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 135248 AT&T $211.19 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 135249 AT&T $2.20 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 136250 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $323.25 LAB SUPPLIES 135251 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $35,576.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.O.8-9-89 135252 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION $222.705.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-52-1 135253 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY 5132.16 PUBLICATION 135254 AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO. $22.410.67 CONSTRUCTION P2-51 135255 AMICON,INC. $1,509.35 LAB SUPPLIES 135256 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $408.69 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 135257 ABC LABORATORIES $235.00 LAB SERVICES 135258 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $2,518.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135259 ARMOR-VAC $624.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 135280 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $282.20 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 135251 ART WORKS $169.22 AWARDS FRAMING 135262 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PRODUCTS $133.61 BUILDING MATERIALS 136263 AMSA $1.185.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION m 135264 ATKIN/JONES COMPUTER SERVICE $642.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT X 135265 AURORAPUMP $859.81 PUMP PARTS 2 135267 BRWAUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $5,204.85 SAFETY SERVICES 135260 BRW SAFETY&SUPPLY $1 526.90 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135259 BATTERY SPECIALEYCO.. ,297.82 PUBLICATION b0 135270 BATTERY COMPRESSOR $3,297.82 BATTERIES 135270 BAUER COMPRESSOR $2,528.20 COMPRESSOR PARTS H 135271 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $6.211.19 LAB SUPPLIES 135272 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS 545,874.51 LAB EQUIPMENT 135273 WT BILLARD $250.04 BUILDING REPAIRS 135274 BIOMERIEUX VITEK,INC. $992.85 LAB SUPPLIES 135275 BIOTECH NET,INC. $56.12 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135276 BLACK&VEATCH $4,161.86 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-25-1 135277 BOERINGER MANNHEIM $1.214.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135278 BONA-RUES $453.10 TRUCK PARTS 135279 BOOT BARN 5450.68 SAFETY SHOES 135280 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $1.665.93 ELECTRIC PARTS 135251 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. $304.93 INSTRUMENT 1352B2 BUDGET JANITORIAL $5,271.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 135283 BNI BOOKS $353.24 BOOKS 135284 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $1,024.09 SUBSCRIPTION 135285 BURKE ENGINEERING CO. $340.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 135286 BUSINESS NEWS PUBLISHING $62.00 SUBSCRIPTION 135287 CH2M HILL $1,119.22 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 135208 C.P.I. $1,074.27 LAB SUPPLIES 135289 CRC PRESS,INC. $637AS LAB SUPPLIES 135290 CRM FILMS $1,454.88 LAB SUPPLIES 135291 CS COMPANY $17.023.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/19M PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 126194 POSTING DATE 12694 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135292 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $192.13 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135293 CALSCIENCE ENVIRONMENTAL LABS $4.650.00 LAB SERVICES 135294 CARLETON ENGINEERS $127.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 135295 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $1,976.87 ENGINEERING SERVICES 11.17 135M CASHCO $491.60 VALVE 135297 CENTER FOR PROFESSIONAL DEV. $295.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 135M CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL INT. $3,291.17 OFFICE FURNITURE 135299 CENTURY PAINT $224.62 PAINT SUPPLIES 136300 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $2,187.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135301 CHEM SERVICE $700.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135302 BRIAN CHUCHAUS JEEP, INC. $15.959.89 VEHICLE 135303 COAST DISTRIBUTION $1,433.90 OPERATING SUPPLIES 1353154 COLE SCIENTIFIC,INC. $195.00 LAB SERVICES 135305 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $1,051.45 LAB SUPPLIES 135308 COUCH&SONS $19.378.87 ENGINEERING SERVICES 135307 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $2.474.00 PUMP PARTS 1353D8 COMPUSA, INC. $2.236.46 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135309 COMPUSERVE $86.76 COMPUTER SERVICES TTI 135310 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $196.27 TRUCK PARTS X 135311 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $9,800.15 ELECTRIC PARTS .=y 135312 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $521.79 TOOLS CO 135313 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. 53,846.68 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 135314 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS 5565.69 PRINTING 135315 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C 5286.35 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.7-17-91 CM 135316 COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC. $3.734.08 CENTRAL GEN.PARTS 1 135317 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $170.21 TRUCK PARTS N 135318 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $939.21 ELECTRIC PARTS 135319 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $1.848.13 HAZARDOUS WASTE TAX 135320 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $293.58 DIESEL USE TAX 135321 DAILY PILOT $115.50 NOTICES&ADS 136322 DEAVER MANUFACTURING CO. $587.54 TRUCK PARTS 135323 HSKIDECKER $293.99 INSTRUMENTPARTS 135324 DEZURICK AND/OR CS CO. $1,253.50 FREIGHT 135325 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $4,591.19 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.B-11-93 135326 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $2.212.57 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135327 SYCON CORP. $245.22 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135328 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $5,605.0D HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSALM0.1-13-92 136329 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $113,837.28 CONSTRUCTION P146-1 135330 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $=.Do PLANT MAINTENANCE&REPAIRS 135331 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $486.81 PAINT SUPPLIES 135332 ESP NORTH 5286.32 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 135333 EASTMAN,INC. $1.756.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135334 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $75.64 LAB SUPPLIES 135336 ENCAD $70.04 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 135336 ENCHANTER,INC. $5,040.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6.10-92 135337 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC. $357.60 LAB SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1119/94 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 126194 POSTING DATE 126M WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135338 JOSEPH EVANS $1,292.58 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 135339 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $714.28 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 135340 MARSHALL FAIRRES $78.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 135341 FASTFRAME OF HUN INGTON BEACH $106.11 AWARDS FRAMING 135342 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $268.50 AIR FREIGHT 135343 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $122.06 FILTERS 135344 FIRST COMPANY $256.45 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 135345 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $3,104.99 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 135346 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $1,08226 LAB SUPPLIES 135347 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $5,632AS LAB SUPPLIES 135348 FLOSYSTEMS $7,212.64 PUMP PARTS 135349 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA S313.65 PHOTO SUPPLIES 135350 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $1,279.00 PAINT SUPPLIES - 135351 THE FOXBORO CO. $167.M INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135352 FRASE ASSOCIATES $500.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION 135353 FREEDOM IMAGING $58.87 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136354 THE FUTURE NOW $457.94 PRINTING 135355 GST,INC. $34,771.88 OFFICE EQUIPMENT - m 135356 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $2,565.61 LUMBERIHARDWARE X 135357 GENERAL BINDING CORP. $1.418.27 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS 135358 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4,587.41 TELEPHONE SERVICES Ly 135359 GIERLICH-MITCHELL,INC. $23,459.56 PUMP PARTS 135360 GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $30.00 PUBLICATIONS "4 135361 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $8,274.66 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES LA 135362 GRASSY S.T.I. $1,635.88 CENTRAL GENERATION PARTS 1 135363 DGA CONSULTANTS $1,560.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 W 135364 HCM MEDICAL REVIEW $264.84 PUBLICATION 135365 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $12.93 PRINTING 135366 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $78.62 TRUCK PARTS 135367 FREDA HARPER $1.500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 135368 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $663.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135369 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $3,234.53 TRUCK PARTS 135370 HAWKINS ASSOCIATES $8.425.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 135371 PL HAWN GO,INC. S465.71 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 135372 HEWLETT PACKARD $1.348.73 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135373 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $719.61 MECHANICAL PARTS 135374 HOME DEPOT $230.00 HARDWARE 135375 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $104A7 PAINT SUPPLIES 135376 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $67,963.32 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 135377 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $422.12 CONNECTORS 135378 INGRAM PAPER $495.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135379 INTELLIGENETICS $710.38 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135380 INSTITUTE FOR SCIENTIFIC INFO S2,945.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135381 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $391.93 BATTERIES 135382 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $107.76 WATER USE 135383 J&W SCIENTIFIC $818.54 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/19/94 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 126M94 POSTING DATE 126H94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135384 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $834.36 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 135385 JAVID CONTRACTORS,INC. $87.291.65 CONSTRUCTION P2-23-5-1 135386 JAY'S CATERING $357.84 DIRECTORS MEETING EXPENSE 135387 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO. $1.789.61 GAUGE 13SWO JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $89.70 ELECTRIC PARTS 135389 JONES CHEMICALS.INC. $1.976.99 CHEMICALS 135390 KALLEEN'S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $388.29 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 135391 KAMAN BEARINGS&SUPPLY $749.16 MACHINE SUPPLIES 135392 KELLY SERVICES $1.021.39 TEMPORARY PERSONNEL SERVICES 135393 KING BEARING,INC. $1,318.55 MACHINE SUPPLIES 135394 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.922.45 TOOLS 135395 LCD POWER SYSTEMS $2,149.43 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135396 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $570.11 CELLULAR TELEPHONE CHARGES 135397 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $444.72 PUMP PARTS 135398 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT L.LAVOIE S433.15 LEGAL SERVICES-NRZEN 135399 LEE B RO CONSULTING ENGR. $39,639.78 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140-2 135400 CHARLES P.CROWLEY CO. $1,038.08 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135401 LEWCO ELECTRIC $477.53 TRUCK PARTS M 135402 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $126,447.10 DEFERRED COMP TRUSTEE X 135403 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $2,280.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIRONMENTAL 135404 SOHO-LYNCH CORP. $137.91 JANITORIAL SERVICES DO 135405 MPS $122.46 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 135406 MANDIC MOTORS $59.00 TOWING SERVICES 135407 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $898,451.00 CONSTRUCTION P2.42-2 135408 MARVAC ELECTRONICS S286.80 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES r 135409 MATT-CHLOR,INC. $572.71 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 135411 MIDWAY TA WESTERN MACHINING E7,$52.92 LAB SUPPLIES 1354H MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRIES. $52.92 LAB SUPPLIES - 135412 MINTIE CORP. $2,040.00 HVAC REPAIRS 135413 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,480.72 UNIFORM RENTALS 135414 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $760.00 LAB SERVICES 135415 MORTON SALT $484.68 SALT 135416 NASCO WEST,INC. $250.26 LAB SUPPLIES 135417 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $5,821.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135418 NEWARK ELECTRONICS $502.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135419 NEWWEST ELECTRONICS $369.95 LAB SUPPLIES 135420 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $38.11 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135421 NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL $200.000.00 NEW HEALTH ACCOUNT 135422 OI CORPORATION $189.18 LAB SUPPLIES 135423 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $536.88 SAFETY GLASSES 135424 OFFICE PAVILIONSANTERIOR RESOURCES $35.00 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS 135425 OX SYSTEMS CO. $7,197.44 CHLORINE M.O.11-18.92 135426 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL E2,016.82 CHEMICALS 135427 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. S2,404.49 FITTINGS 135428 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS $13.41 PUBLICATION 135429 OXYGEN SERVICE $6,647.61 SPECIALTY GASES FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1119194 PAGE 05 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 126/94 POSTING DATE 126/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135430 PSI $225.79 STEAM CLEANING SERVICES 135431 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $236.06 OPERATING SUPPLIES 135432 PSSI $1.312.50 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 135433 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $470.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 13MM PACIFIC PARTS $164.83 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135435 PACIFIC SEWER MAINTENANCE CO. $9,517.00 SEWER REPAIRS 135436 PACIFIC BELL $125.55 TELEPHONE SERVICES 135437 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $188.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 135438 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $743.97 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 135439 PAKWEST $615.52 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 135"0 PARTS UNLIMITED $233.76 TRUCK PARTS 135441 PASCAL B LUDWIG $62,510.40 CONSTRUCTION PI-42 135442 PASCAL B LUDWIG $381.640.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-38-2 135443 PASCAL 8 LUDWIG.INC. $71,527.50 CONSTRUCTION P2.43.1 135444 ROY PENDERGRAFT $124.05 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 135445 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $2,902.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135446 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS,INC. $25,657.26 CHEMICALS m 136447 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $129,658.23 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 X 135448 PITNEY BOWES $270.18 POSTAGE MACHINE SERVICE AGREEMENT 2 135M9 POLYMETRICS, INC. $23,972.51 LAB SUPPLIES tz 13M50 POLYPURE,INC. $17,380.63 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 135451 POSITIVE FORMULATORS,INC. $252.20 CHEMICALS -I 135452 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $109.00 ICE 135453 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY $164.00 FENCING INSTALLATION 1 135454 QUEST MEDIA B SUPPLIES $3.001.79 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135465 R M CONTROLS $421.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135456 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,080.97 ELECTRIC MOTORS 135457 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $2,610.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135458 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $1,699.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135469 BOLT DELIVERY $95.34 FREIGHT 135460 REISH MARINE STUDIES.INC. $1.800.00 OCEAN MONITORING 135461 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $472.07 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136462 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT.CORP. $95.55 LAB SUPPLIES 135463 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $2.299.42 ELECTRIC PARTS 135464 SARBS-PDC $11,500.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 135465 DOUG SARVIS $750.00 CPRIFIRST AID TRAINING 135466 SCHAEFER DIXON ASSOCIATES $1,100.00 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.11-18-92 135467 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTL $153,411.07 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-9.93 135468 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $73.97 TOOLS 135469 MARC SHIPMAN $2,700.00 GROUNDSKEEPING SERVICES 135470 SHURELUCK SALES $10,420.84 TOOLS/HARDWARE 135471 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $50.34 LAB SUPPLIES 135472 SKYPARK WALL-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $221.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 135473 SOLO NEOTRONICS $871.85 METER 135474 SO.CALIF.EDISON CO. $24,790.00 ELECTRICAL SERVICE REPAIRS 135475 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. $105.169.11 POWER FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1119/94 PAGE O6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1/20M POSTING DATE 7/28194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135476 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $20,017.12 NATURAL GAS 135477 SO.CALIF.WATER CO. $57.36 WATER USE 135478 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $994.13 DIESEUUNLEADED FUEL 135479 SOUVENIR PHOTO $215.06 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 135480 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,078.11 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 135481 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $3.887.64 METER 135482 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $2.800.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 135483 WESTALLOY,INC. $243.22 WELDING SUPPLIES 135484 STANCO'S VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE $5,296.41 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 135485 GARY G.STREED - $7,489.51 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 135486 STROMBOTINE PRINTING $355.58 PRINTING 13507 SUMMIT STEEL $1,323.56 METAL 135488 SUNSET FORD $312.95 TRUCK PARTS 135489 SUPELCO,INC. $576.55 LAB SUPPLIES 135490 SUPER CHEM CORP. $1.325.43 CHEMICALS 135491 SUPER ICE CORP. $92.22 LAB SUPPLIES 135492 SUR-LITE CORPORATION $600.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 135493 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $532.12 ELECTRIC CART PARTS m 135494 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $2.220.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS X 135495 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK $10.266.10 TRUSTEE SERVICES 2 CO 135497 TRANSMANINDUSTRIAL SUPPLY ,854.29 MECHANICAL PARTS 135498 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES INC. $$894.19 TRAVEL INSTRUMENT PARTS 135499 TRAVEL AUTO $456.03 TRAVEL SERVICES DO 135500 TRUCK&AUTO SUPPLY,INC. .047.36 TRUCK PARTS 135501 JG TUCKAILER LABS $2,662.14 LAB SERVICES 01 135501 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $$58.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136603 TWININ LABOODGERATORIES 997.28 TRULAB SERVICES PARTS 135504 TWINING LABORATORIES $9,$75.30 LAB SERVICES 135504 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS E75.30 TRUCK PARTS 135505 U.S.C.SPONSORED PROJECTS ACCT. $17.050.52 TECHNICAL SERVICES 135506 THE UNISOURCE CORP. $649.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135507 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $264.55 PARCEL SERVICES 135508 VWR SCIENTIFIC $195.28 LAB SUPPLIES 135509 VALLEY CRIES SUPPLY CO. $1,271.54 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135510 VAN NOSTRAND REINHOLD $67.88 BOOK 135511 VILLAGE NURSERIES $41.43 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 135512 CARL WARREN&CO. $300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 135513 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $15,624.05 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 135514 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $5.50 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 135515 DICK WILLIAMS/BILL ROBERTS $1,500.00 SECURITY CONSULTANTS 135516 ROURKE,WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN 146,535.44 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 135517 XEROX CORP. 6.553.26 COPIER LEASES 135518 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. 6,158.80 LAB SUPPLIES 135619 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT CO. 89.58 LAB SUPPLIES 1355M JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP. 35.04 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135521 RICHARD YOUNG PROD. 181.52 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1119194 PAGE 07 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1/26194 POSTING DATE 1/26/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135522 ZIEBARTH 8 ALPER/C.S.ALPER $15,089.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 135523 ZYMARK CORP. $12,261.75 LAB EQUIPMENT 135524 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 53,610,279.72 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $950.64 92 OPER FUND 25,816.17 03 OPER FUND 22,727.39 #3 CAP FAC FUND 370.79 #5 OPER FUND 3,260.11 05 CAP FAC FUND 12.01 #8 OPER FUND 752AO 06 CAP FAC FUND 115.50 nl #7 OPER FUND 15,544.11 x #7 CAP FAC FUND 7,404.24 2 #11 OPER FUND 7,464.89 #11 CAP FAC FUND 4,394.90 #13 OPER FUND 34.90 —1 #14 OPER FUND 788.82 4586 OPEN FUND 4,290.77 #586 CAP FAC FUND 1.845.35 #687 OPERFUND 2,110.86 07814 OPER FUND 7,162.59 JT OPER FUND 752.456.67 CORF 2,238,857.31 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 16,196.82 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 497,711.48 53.610279.72 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA MARCH 9, 1994 - 7:30 P.M. SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (16) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing consideration of item (16)(c) listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2). (b) Verbal report of General Counsel (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Property Damage, La Veta Monterey Condominium Association, a California non-profit, mutual benefit corporation; and Robert Segesta, an individual vs. Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. and County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 726220, relative to property damage sustained during the construction of the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, and authorize the District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District or to select special counsel to represent the District (see attached memorandum). FOUNTAIN VALLEY l.,A.TMES �,A•TMfiS e MONDAY.JULY 19.HV3 �.ao-9: SUNDAY FEBRUARY27 1990/t* City Workers to Get i"9)tA COUNTY a Raises from Windfall j luntington Beach Tustin Police, City employees will receive pay rais- `*Trustees OK Pay, es as a result of a program to share the 4v, Other City wealth if the city prospered this year. benefits Increases City Manager Ray Kromer said the • . city realized savings of about $500,000 •1;an�:•:i.:::ea 4. :r for the fiscal year ending in June.Under HUNTINGTON BEACH—Hum- the program, employees will receive a 'tlagton Brach Union High School Workers to Get percentage of the savings•amounting to District trueness have ratified con- about$100,00D. tracts giving all district employees Kromer said the remainder of the a 45% pay increase and a 1.25% money will go into the city's reserves. ' hike In benefits. Savings resulted from not filling 15 Job The new one-year contracts for 2.5% Raises nclud- vi,cancfes in which the employees ab- 'more than 1200 employees.illion. / Raises sorbed the workload, no rate increases •:grul teachers,irkYost$2S mie on. for outside contracts and higher sales tax toTrustee Dirk Voss cast the only revenue than anticipated,Kromer said ' Pots against. the agreement lac[ The City Council recently approved week Voss said that employees giving out the pay hikes to employees. have done a good job but that TUSTIN—Salary Increases o[ Kromer said the"profit-sharing"Idea ' trustees should delay a pay in- 2.5% have been approved.for mu- was an innovative approach because of •creaseBBe until they have long-range m projections on how to save money Ncipel workers1n three employee groups,including the ee a the uncertain economic outlook and the for the district The action was approved want- effect of state revenue cutbacks on the Voss said"the district:will ime. mouely by the City Council last city's general-fund budget. about M,000. from its ieaerve week. 'There was no way automatic raises hind to pay for* the salary and could he guaranteed:' Kromer said. benefitincreases. '1', Alter negotiations that erected N ' r ra Ro 3 i -. ' Oct "But If we cut expenses, and we had Assistant Supt.Susan Ro ar city an, representatives from the P said city and the unions agreed to savings, then everybody could share in -.�;the district has a reserve of W.87 one-year contracts retroactive to the savings." ;million,or 6.2%of its budget after Kromer added that if there was no Jan.1.officials saidthe ;paying the eatery and benefit in- hiisaddition m the pay raise, extra money or employees city had broken !creases The ethedistrict's reserve >e even financially, employees would not employees with one dependent wW have received the pay bonuses. .;more than twice the reserve that receive an additional $23 a month. ��•the state requires of school dis- for medical Insurance premiums; The savings windfall will be shared ;;tricta.she sell. . ._.__ ... among 1 e employees, which includesand - ..(toper also said the benefits in- general employees. professional tmen and ��g nee pays only for rising costa of technical groups, Fire Department eta- `hiklth Insurance and doesn't rep- -and management and city de- - _recent additional benefits. pertinent heads. "_ psfee Michael Simone held The pay raises,retroactive to Aug.19, 6ht employees hadn't received a mount to4 between $20 a month and x7- increase in two years and $100 a month, depending on the em- erred a pay raise for doing a ployee'eJob classification,Kromer said. od Joti abd being foul employ- -DEBRA CANO -. :: Hoard President Jerry SuWvan .;;skid the district has the money for �.��.�.�.._�,,,. •- "t6_g pay increase "because it has ed well and is in good shape. NEWPOR'F.BEACH hp rase the bottom failing natP r[ ; Three dty otfiaas- ot[ `raises Monday night#rani. fife:pity Council; -on �opthe':- Cent cos aincrease ;. all city emplo �'"` s iecei_veii •Jan.`s an��g�� �� � t girt: ' increase to receive V REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN 3-9-94 11 Presentation of Plaques and Resolutions to Retiring Directors. As you know, several of our directors recently retired from the Boards and we would like to acknowledge their efforts on behalf of the Districts' with the presentation of a plaque and a resolution expressing the Boards' appreciation for their outstanding service. Over the years, these directors have not only performed their duties as City Council or Sanitary District members with a high degree of professionalism and dedication, but they have also been equally involved in the wastewater management program of the Sanitation Districts. - Item 1 Continued on Next Page - y Director's Name ciw District(s) Attending? Bob Bell Villa Park 2 Give to Barry Denes James Evans Midway City 3 Yes Sanitary Gail Kerry Cypress 3 Eva Miner La Palma 3 Maria Moreno Placentia 2 Rob Richardson Santa Ana 1 Jim Silva Huntington Bch 3 Yes Hank Wedaa Yorba Linda 2 - Item 2 on Next Page - s 2) Upcoming Meetings A. Fiscal Policy Committee - The Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday. March 16. at 5:30 P.m. B. Executive Committee - The Executive Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday. March 23. at 5 :30 p.m . Invite two of the following Directors to attend and participate in the discussions: Jan Debay and Barry Denes -or- Burnie Dunlap or Norman Eckenrode Item 2 Continued on Next Page - C. Special Joint Works Selection Committee Re Computers - The Special Joint Works Selection Committee Re Computers is scheduled to meet on Wednesday. March 30. at 5:30 p.m. - End of Report - wpdoc\g m\jcrpts\jc03.94 .r ro .. DATE March 9, 1994 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 5 14 A; Iga ,FONT BOARDS IBEYEw ............ BARRERA ......... ✓ BIEYERI ..............SARREM .......... ✓ — IREADEI ............ MC OUMAN ......- - IFORSYTIIEI .. .........BROWN ............. WORM............. FERRYMAN ........ WO ..............CATLIN. ............$ IFONTIOUM ......... SALTMIEW........ (SCOTT) .............:COLUNS ...........JG ISTEINEm ........... STANTON ......... . BIEBAYI 6SI1 . . . ..........._ .............. — SOFPQ BAY ISAN). .. ............DENES ............ A! — DISTRICT 2 WELU. ...............GENES ............JG — ISCOTTI ............ COLLINSPICKER .......... JL WELSONI EILERI .......BLKENRmicAp DE ........ _ (DAILY) ............. IMARER .......... J_.S✓G__ IRAERTZWE.... .......EOLENRAN ...... — IBEYERI ............ BAw1ERA ......... W IMMOI ............. FERRYMAN .........Nom — IBELLP. . ........... GRIN .......... IMANONEYI .... ...... .FLORA ........ — RMAERTZ. LENT ..... DEKES ........... JL IBONO ...............GRIFFIN ULLM N ........7 IMAERIZWESERI ..... ECKENRODF ....... ,� —_ —_ IWELCHI ......... .....OULIMSON ........ — (FLORA) ............ MAHONEY ......... M/ IWARDI ..............HAMMOND ......... _ MARKETS ........... NELSON .......... _W KING ................HART ............. GUM ............. BYLMM ........... J[ IMOUL�ATIERSOM .. LEIPZIO............ — MS NERI ........... STANTON ......... IMNERI . . ............LWN . . ............ — IOULUXSONI......... MIELCH ........... INC OUIOANI ..........LUTZ . .. ..........ISINGEA) ............ ZLAKET........... JG IFLOAAI ..............F.NHONEY ......... — ILUTZI . ..............MC OUIOAN ........ DISTRICT S IPoLDOI ..............MORENO .......... — ESTRADAI .......... SAPET ........... Er/ IROBITAILLEI ...........MOULTON-PAlTFRSON _ WELSOM ........... MORO I, .......... __,e MARKER) .............NELSON ........... — (FORSYTHO ......... BRONN ........... JC IDUNLAM .............PARKER INORSYI ............ G1LN ........... INICHOLSOM ..........PARTW............ _ (SCOTT) .. ........ COIIM .......... IOALYI ...............PH:KLER ........... — IMAHONEYI ......... FLORA ........ IPUCKETFI ............PONTIOUS ......... IBONEI ............. (lit._... .y ISALTARELLD ..........waETT .......... — IMINEm ............ w . ILUTZI ...............F%, MP. ........... — IMC OUIOANI ........ LUTZ............. IEVANS) ..............RICE . . ............� — IROBRAILW ......... MOULTON-PAT IERSON IPoNTIWSF ...........SALTARELLI ...... NICHOLSONI ........ MRTN ........... IDEBAYI ..............SANSONE .......... DALYI ............. PM]LL01 .......... IESTRADAI ............SAFEJ ............41 IEVANSI ............ RICE ............. (ZLAKETI .............AI Mfi............— _— RLAKET) ...........JNSNP........... STENER) .... .........STANTON ..........� _ ISTENERI ........... STANTON ......... M NI TANTO ... .........STENER . .......... or ISElVA00R.......... SYLVM ........... IMVLMFU ..............SWAN . ............. ISELVAO04........... SYLVIA............ — DISTRICT 5 IPERSYMCHEAFflO ......WANNER ..........JL — IDEBAYI ............4141 ............. IOULUXSONI...........MUCH ....... .... IDEIMY1 ....... SANSONE ......... IROBRAILLO .......... N WCHELL ......... — ISTANTONI .......... STEINER .......... IS NOERI ..............ZLAKET ...........JG DISTRICT B STAFF OTHERS IPERRYI ............ WA111lR.......... SYLVESTER..LI WOODRUFF . ICOXI . ............. HART ............ MOWN . ... ANWAR .... _ ANDERSON . . DEMIR ..... ISTANTOM .......... STENER . . ... ..... — CLAWSON .. FUMING ... JG DISTRICT 7 DAMS..... HOHENER ... — IWAPoI IWMMOND . ....... HASENSTAS . HOUGH .... ISCHFAFEw ......... WANNER .......... HODOES .... HOWARD ... KYLE ...... HUNT . ..... (BEYER) ........ BARRERA ......... LNOER . .... mow ..... ISANSONEI .......... DEBAV . . ......... NELLOR LEE . ...... _ 01ILD01 . ........... MORENO . ......... NICHOW.... LINDSTROM . ISALTARELLB ........ — (STANTON) .......... STEINER . ..•••.... OOTEN ..... .e LYNCH ..... SIMFSON . ..-G SHAW DISTRICT 11 STREED .... STONE ..... . POSITAILLE) ......... WINCHEIL ........: VNCENT. ... WAGON YOUNG _ IMOULTON�PATTFRSONI LEIPZIO .......... w . /W�INBOR . ... YOUNG — ISTEINEm ........... STANTON . ....... Sy,`S� DISTRICT 13 IWELCHI .. ......... . OULIIXSON ........ w ISEYERI ............ BAARERA ......... IDUNLAP ALY) . ........... PARKE MAIYI R ......... T (�L/ ID ........... PICKIER .......... ISTANTONI .......... SIENEII .......... DISTRICT 14 IMILLERI ............ SWAN ............ IPUCKETT .......... �Jy),,L{(� IBEYERI ............ BARREN ......... fI�-" ' DLro3.E (WARD) .......... HAMMOND ....... 021M94 ISTANTONI .......... STENER .......... . — PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY March 9, 1994 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM Please Print Please Print CSOOG . L* Allfw 4,/LSGr- CSdoc• n 4 vl= Ji9rn I LT l a v,E ts4b C -d So/ 0 � so Te ctOcc - So/ MnV 4 C S 0 Tol ifif .J c CAeL E. BCACN Csoac Sol •�� 1 � CzDoC SOI REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES.( c l� DATE: �- ` ' I 1 AGENDA ITEM NO. x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) L L C N �� I HOME ADDRESS: (NUMBER/STREET (CITY ZIP CODE) TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: SELF OR NAME OF ORGANIZATION) F28A REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: 3 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) HOME ADDRESS: 14b5 Lr/. 3/C� .ST. (NUMBER STREET 9p0 S� "s iVCELZIP l� 10 Gill, �7.f CITY ODE TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: INDE LbC?L SO/ (SELF OR NAME OF ORGANIZAT ON F28A FORM OF MOTION 1 . Direct Executive Committee to consider at its next meeting, whether to retain an independent consultant to undertake value engineering and investigate the issues set out in The Register article. 2. If Executive Committee approves the hiring of a consultant, that it be authorized to solicit proposals. 03/09/94 JOINT BOARD MEETING #3 - Appointment of Chairman oro tem District 3 - Director Wally Linn was appointed Chairman pro tern for District 3 due to Chairman and Chairman pro tem being absent. #5 - Public Comments JC: I have two people who have indicated a willingness to speak. The first is Ellen Ray and then David L. Hamilton. Customary time limit is five minutes. Ellen Ray: I am on the employees' bargaining committee for the Operations and Maintenance Employees. I would like to ask that you read and consider the packet given to you tonight by the negotiating committee. If you haven't received this packet, one of your employees, Joe Park, has one in the corner there for you. We have been negotiating in good faith since September 14, 1993. From the start we were told there was no Districts' money available for anything. We accepted this as truth. Then we were told there was some money but it is only for those employees who work a 12-hour shift. Something is wrong here, folks. We want to reach an agreement with the Districts and we ask your support in achieving this goal. Thank you very much. David L. Hamilton: Good evening everybody. I hope this is the last time I am going to have to be here this year. I hate to waste your valuable time but there is a necessity for it and that's why I'm here. We, like some of you, are skeptical to the amount of information you receive. We read in the newspapers like everybody else. This is very, very important to us. This could be our livelihood for quite a while here. I say our because I represent to your people here. We want to make sure that you see what our last proposal is because we've been told that this proposal can't come back to the Board and a few of the people that make the decision, we believe it should come back to you. We're not very far apart monetarily. You can afford where we are at, I am sure. We've looked at your budget and there Is nothing that separates us from coming to an agreement as far as the monetary issues are concerned. We are very, very close folks. We don't need to argue over pennies. Most of our issues are not really cost issues. They are issues of very much importance to us but they don't cost you anything. We understand the political motivation of this Board but I think it's time for you to stop and put politics aside and say, "these are your people. These are what they deserve. The hell with politics. These are people that work hard for a living. They do a damn good job and they should be rewarded thusly". -1- Look at this proposal carefully and give us a response that we know is from you. We want to know what your response. Give us that indication. Remember, these people do work hard, are very competent and they are your employees and your constituents. I will be available if anyone has any questions later or if you have now, please don't be afraid to ask. X6(a) - Joint Chairman's Report JC: This evening we are going to present some plaques and resolutions to retiring Directors. As you know, several of our Directors recently retired from the Boards and we would like to acknowledge their efforts with the presentation of a plaque and a resolution expressing the Boards' appreciation for their outstanding service. Over the years these Directors have not only performed their duty as City Council or Sanitary District members with a high degree of professionalism and dedication, but they have also been equally involved in the wastewater management program and the Sanitation Districts. I would like Bob Bell, I think Bob was not going to be here but Barry, I think you were going to take Bob's plaque. Jim Evans (JC presented resolution; VJC presented plaque). Mr. Evans stated it was a pleasure working with the Districts. Jim Silva (JC presented resolution; VJC presented plaque). Mr. Silva thanked the staff. Also thanked the elected body and working with them. JC: I don't believe that Director Eva Miner, Gail Kerry, Maria Moreno, Rob Richardson or Hank Wedaa are here. We'll make presentations to them later. Upcoming Meetings: Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, March 16th, at 5:30 p.m. The Executive Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, March 23rd, at 5:30 p.m. I would like to ask Jan Debay and Barry Denes to be there. Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, March 30th at 5:30 p.m. #6(b) - Report of the General Manaaer JWS: As you know, we are having a New Directors' Orientation and Treatment Plant Tour. It has been scheduled for Saturday, March 19th from 9:00 a.m. to -2- 1:30 p.m. We have sent information to all of you and a form. Those of you who have not yet returned the RSVP form, we put another copy in your folders tonight so that we could do the proper planning. I would appreciate it if you could complete this form and either leave it in your folder or with the clerk this evening. Some of you who may have a conflict, we'll try to schedule maybe a follow-up orientation and tour in a month or so. This is called a New Directors' Orientation and Tour but all Directors are encouraged to attend. That completes my report. #61c) - Report of the General Counsel TLW: There is just one item. There is a supplemental agenda item for District No. 1 . The District received a Summons and Complaint today and I think the Chairman is going to add that to the agenda just prior to going into closed session. Other than that I have no report. #9d - Consent Calendar JC: I would just like to point out for the record that as the agenda was written there was a mistake on Item 9(j)(2), the resolution number in the agenda should be 94-35-6. It was correct in your packet but just so that you understand if you notice the discrepancy on that item. Is there anyone that would like to remove any items from the Consent Calendar? Director John Collins: Mr. Chairman, item #9d, please. We are being asked to approve four new vehicles, one of them going to the motor pool, one going to operations, one going to planning and design and one going to construction management. I would like to move the two vehicles, the motor pool vehicle and operations vehicle, and hold back on the other two vehicles. I find no substantiation for these vehicles. I have no complaint on the prices involved. I think they are good prices. I met with the Department Head that these vehicles are to be assigned to and I still do not have a clear substantiation, cost-effective or use of those vehicles so I would like to ask that they be removed and those two vehicles come back with a better description to the Directors. I think at this time we're spending a lot of money on things we ought to be very careful that we know exactly where it's going. If it is appropriate at this time I would like to move the passage of Item 9(d) to include only the two vehicles going to the motor pool and operations. Second. Director Pickier: Does that affect the price of the two vehicles? JWS: These are purchased under the State procurement contract. The only reason it might be affected is if there is a deadline that we can't meet if we bring -3- them back at a later date. It is a per vehicle price, however. TMD: The vehicle for the planning and design would be a third vehicle in that group. There are 24 people in the group and they share two vehicles now. When they don't have these, they go to the motor pool and get some out. This would add a third vehicle. The vehicle for the construction management would be used by the supervisors in Construction Management. There was a pick-up truck that I found after I talked with Director Collins that was given to the guards and that is what it is really replacing. Director Moreno: Are the vehicles really needed? TMD: We've had an orderly program to replace vehicles to try to keep good vehicles needed, but we can certainly wait. Stanton: I would like to ask what our policy is as far as personal use of these cars. Are any of your employees taking cars home? TMD: Yes. In the Construction Management group there is probably four or five supervisors who take the vehicles home. In the design group there is one supervisor that takes a vehicle home. Stanton: At some point, consider it a request, I would like to see a list of how many people are allowed to take Districts' vehicles home and also I understand from some preliminary questions that were asked by some of my staff that you need some of these to just go from plant to plant or drive around the plant? TMD: We use them for, the people who get the vehicles such as these are those who go out of the plant or go between plants. The inspectors and people within the plant use electric golf carts or bikes. Rice: You said that if they need a car and over the two that they go to the car pool and get one. How many cars do you have in the car pool? TMD: I don't know that. Mr. Hodges would know. EH: The question is how many cars do we have in the motor pool? Rice: Yes EH: We have approximately six sedans, three or four pick-ups and -4- Ferryman: Does the District have a policy where all departments as far as who gets to take the car home or is it a haphazard thing from department to department? JWS: Our policy is that those people who are most likely to be called back for an emergency are those that are assigned a vehicle that they can take home. Lutz: Is there a policy or are people using their own car and being reimbursed for their mileage? TMD: Yes, they are being reimbursed. Lutz: Is that a norm or is the norm to get a Districts car? TMD: We want them to take a Sanitation Districts car if one is available and only use their own car if nothing is available. Lutz: And, the reason being? TMD: I think it is insurance. Stanton: Is either one or the other or both of these two cars that are excluded by Director Collins motion in that category of cars that might be taken home used for personal use? TMD: Yes, one of them would replace the Construction Managers car and he would be giving his to someone else and he would drive that home. Barrera: Regarding sedans - having to use pickups and I would also like to know call back for emergency. How many times a month does that happen; how often do these emergencies happen where they have to come back here that would demand a car? JWS: I don't have those numbers with me. Perhaps one of the department heads could speak for their own department. Barrera: A report? JWS: We could do that. Debay: Two questions - if these two cars are deleted, would this affect our performance at all and the second question is, you mentioned insurance? Does this place us at any risk to use a personal car? Are we risking something? -5- TMD: If the cars are deleted we can continue throughout Engineering. I can't answer the insurance question. TLW: Maybe I can comment on that. I think the Directors may know the Districts are entirely self-insured. We have no liability insurance and that is based on a policy of valuation that has been made and in place for a number of years. We have a very substantial contingency reserved money for liability and it has proven to be very economically beneficial to the Districts to do. The policy is generally to discourage individuals from using their own car for two reasons. One, if the individual uses his own car, he really has an obligation to personally report it to his insurance company that his car will now be used for business purposes and therefore his policy will be re-rated from personal use to business use. His premium will go up so the Districts would be faced with either forcing the individual to absorb a cost (which is really a Districts cost) or to reimburse that individual. Secondly, you have a liability question when the individual is using his car, whether his insurance should be called upon to respond in damages or whether the Districts have to step in and leads to a legal tussle as to who should be at fault primarily to answer to any such complaint so the policy has been to really very very narrowly limit the use of the private vehicles. Pickier: I guess in looking at these four. The first two are to replace and I read the last two as additional. I don't think they have given us a good reason of why they need two additional now. If they were replacing, I can understand. I think Collins has a valid point that they come back and give us some good reasons for needing the additional vehicles or they are replacing some vehicles, I think we should know that. Gullixson: Is there any reason why we shouldn't wait for the report to place an order for all four? If we decide to do it eventually, do it all at once? Hodges: The state contract for sedans - the drop dead date for purchasing these vehicles is March 15 or 17. If we waited a month we would miss that window of opportunity. We did go out and make sure that the prices are an acceptable price. We did go out and solicit some bids from the private industry and found that on the average the costs of these sedans was around $1,800 - $2,000 a piece higher for an equivalent sedan. JC: Further discussion? We have a motion and a second on the floor. Call for the question. JC: Any opposition to the motion? Motion passes - unanimous consent. -6- #11 - Summary Financial Report Hart: On the first page under "Other Reserves". Is that ------ individual Districts --- -----? GGS: There was a white staff report that accompanied this article. There is a summary on the front and then the individual financial statements are attached to that. The question is, as I understand it, is on the first page, the numbers that have come from the budget document that was approved approximately a year ago. All of those reserves, the construction reserves and the other reserves are held in the individual Districts. None of those reserves are held in any joint reserve or in any place like that. Those are appropriated for various things - debt service, operating requirements, dry period requirements, Insurance, things of that sort. #12(b) - KPMG and "Bia Six" JC: Director Stanton will be reflected as an abstention. #13 - Job Nos. P1-48: P2-47-2: P2-56 and P2-53-2 TMD: This project is a combination of four smaller projects and includes various repairs of equipment and replacement of older equipment in plants. It includes safety items such as installing new handrails around the plants and as the Directors are aware, you have authorized an extensive seismic rehabilitation program and it includes two buildings at Plant No. 2, seismic strengthening of those buildings. On February 1st we received four bids for this project ranging from the low submitted by Pascal and Ludwig of $1,003,899.00 to a high of $1,774,430.00. The recommended action is to approve two addenda which changed the bid date and clarified a miscellaneous issues and to award to low bidder, Pascal and Ludwig in the amount of $1,003,899.00. Barrera: Has this contractor done work for us before? TMD: Yes, this contractor has worked for us and is working for us presently. (Tape Ended) #16 - Supplemental Agenda JC: I think what I will do is I will advance the item that we had which was a supplemental item this evening for District No. 1 before we go into closed session. TLW: The item for District No. 1 is the district had a construction project about a -7- year for a pipeline project known as the Memory Lane Interceptor. It was a joint project between the City of Orange, City of Santa Ana and the Districts. During the course of excavation there was some ----- as the result of some storms last winter. The complaint is for some property damage. It is not a significant dollar amount. We have an indemnity provision with the general contractor, Mladen Buntich. In addition, since we had this claim in we negotiated as part of the final closeout agreement a supplemental indemnification with the contractor. While we do have to appear and defend the Districts we will probably succeed immediately and have the contractors insurance company take over the defense at no cost to the Districts. I think we passed over item 16(a). In order to take the action as set forth in 16(b) in the Supplemental, we first need a motion to add it to the agenda. This was just received today and we only have 30 days in which to file the answer in Superior Court. JC: Deemed approved. Now we will go for the recommended action. McGuigan: Has this work been completed so it will not delay this completion for the whole project? TLW: Where this location is done, this job has been done in this area for six months. Barrera: Being in the City of Orange, I would like to know what the damages will be and what it was? TLW: The location is at the corner of Parker and La Veta and there was an excavation adjacent to the freeway underpass and at the time of the excavation the contractor struck a water line that was owned by the City of Orange. It was not known at the time and apparently it caused some subsidence. Then there was an open trench, a fairly trench, this pipe was 34 to 36 feet deep. He had a "glory hole" there. The storms came and flooded it and didn't realize there was a crack in the water line. It resulted in the adjacent condominium that is an apartment condominium project and they claimed that some of their patio slabs have sunk and the patio walls cracked. The complaint is very unique; it talks about a 1/16 inch crack in the walls. We tried immediately and the contractor tried immediately to just walk it. In fact, the contractor did enter the site and did make repairs on several patio slabs directly adjacent to Parker Street. This is a follow-up to that and Mladen Buntich has assumed the role of picking up. Barrera: Attorneys ?? -B- TLW: I really can't be sure. I think he was going back several months ago when the claims came in. As I recall, it seems that we had some conversations; not me personally but someone from my office. JC: Deemed approved. #14 - Closed Session TLW: The purpose of the closed session is for two reasons. One, the District management representatives wish to review the status of labor negotiations between the Districts employee groups and the Directors. Secondly, the Districts has reason to believe that there is a potential for a claim to be filed against the Districts as a result of an accident at the Treatment Plant No. 2. Stanton: I just want it real clear before we adjourn for the closed session that we are not going to be engaged in any discussion of whether newspaper reports are or are not correct. As far as I'm concerned any discussion of that nature should be done in full public session. JC: You are correct. They will not be discussed. However, there would be two of them probably that would have to be discussed in closed session that involve litigation if we were to talk about them. The only thing we are going into closed session now for are these two matters. Stanton: I am just registering my own personal objection. If we are in closed session and we get into those things which I think, as one individual, everyone else can speak for themselves, should be discussed in open session. JC: Fine. No disagreement. Director Collins? Collins: Mr. Chairman, I had spoken to you previous to this meeting about a motion that I would like to make regarding this. Since we are not going to be discussing this item in closed session, would it be appropriate to make this motion? JC: You can do it now. Collins: I would like to make a motion that the Boards direct the Executive Committee (EC) to consider at its next meeting whether to retain an independent consultant to undertake value engineering and investigate the issues set out in the Register newspaper article. If the EC approves the hiring of a consultant that they (the EC) be authorized to solicit proposals from that consultant. JC: Why don't we go ahead and set it on the agenda, John and move at that? By -9- the order of the Chair, it will be set on the agenda? Collins: I would like to make it a motion that will take the onus off of you, Bill. JC: I don't have any onus. Fine, we have a motion and a second. Stanton: Maker of the motion, I would strongly support that motion if it is very clear that the consultant is reporting to the Directors and not to the staff or Legal Counsel. Collins: Yes, that would be my idea. I think the words do so say. JC: I think, John, what you are saying is it is to be discussed in the EC in regards to this and we are not going to necessarily, you can certainly, Director Stanton, speak your mind at the EC, but nonetheless I think the motion is let's discuss it and decide if we are going to do it and if so, then the second part was that we would be authorized to go ahead and proceed with an RFP. Collins: The EC would be pre-authorized if they so decided to go ahead and start interviewing the consultant because I don't want to delay here and wait for another meeting, have to come back before us and then we go back to them. Perhaps it would be the pleasure of the EC to even form a further subcommittee from its members to go out and interview these people to make it happen fast. I think it is in the best service of all the Directors, employees and staff as well as the constituents to get this matter resolved in a very timely and equitable fashion. JC: Agreed. Director Stanton? Stanton: Mr. Chairman, if you could just clarify for me. It is my understanding the motion as to whether we should or should not embark on this is to, and that issue is to be decided by this entire board, did I misunderstand you sir that the EC would be deciding that? JC: I believe the motion was that the EC would discuss whether or not we would do it and if, in fact, they decided that it would be done that they would have the authorization to go out for an RFP. Isn't that what you said, John? Collins: I feel comfortable, Mr. Stanton, that the EC can make that decision. I feel comfortable with that. JC: Alright, we're in discussion. Director Moreno? Moreno: I think all of us should make that decision ------ -10- Leipzig: I would appreciate that coming back to the Boards, the full Boards as well. I would like to hear the rationale, the value of the engineering study, the type of consultant analysis of which I am not personally familiar with so it is not clear to me the tactics to be achieved by that consultant study. Collins: The benefits that 1 see being achieved, Victor, would be the fact that the EC is going to be empowered to make the decision and go out and hire somebody. This is what I'm looking at. We can't do that. I don't care, we can do it but it's going to be going to the Executive Board, get recommendations, have them come back and say okay, go out and hire somebody, and we're talking two, three, four months down the road. JC: And that is assuming that the EC says let's hire somebody. The EC may choose otherwise but I just need to say that so the Directors understand it. Maybe the better way to do this, John, is to have the EC discuss it and recommend back to the Boards. Director (?): I support that. JC: I'm not making that as a motion. I'm just asking John. Collins: I would prefer that the EC, and I feel comfortable if they will go ahead and decide to go ahead and hire somebody. I feel comfortable that they should start right away and get the ball rolling. If we bring it back to this Board, it's another month, 30 days down the road. More articles may be written, more accusations may be taken. I want to get this thing resolved in the fastest way possible and if somebody has a better way to do it and have it done faster, I'm looking for that. Stanton: Again, Mr. Chairman, Mr. Collins, when we vote now as an entire Board are we authorizing the EC to move forth and do that? Collins: Yes sir. Stanton: Okay. So it's not decided by the EC if the entire Board of Directors says yes, let's go with an outside consultant then the EC starts that ball rolling at the next meeting. They might decide not to do it. Collins: That's not really the words that are in the motion. JC: Well, let's clear it then. Collins: I would be happy to and I thank you for your consideration. I would be happy to say that that is the way it can be. We are authorizing the EC to get the ball rolling to go off and interview people and start the process. -it- JC: So you are saying here that we are agreeing that we are going to go that way and there will be no discussion in exec session then regarding whether we will or will not. Collins: Yes JC: Alright. That's a new motion? Collins: That's a change. If it pleases the second of that motion, I don't know who seconded. Director ?: It pleases the second. JC: Alright, we have a motion and a second. Okay, discussion. Gullixson: So what the EC is going to do is going to come up with the how. The how to approach the issue, right? Directors: No JC: Now let's make sure. We have a motion that's being made. Let's make sure we understand what it is. John, what specifically is it that you are thinking this motion is? Collins: I believe that now that the motion has changed ----- second change and further changed. My motion is to direct the EC to start the process of investigating the accusations made by The Register's article and to, if necessary, this is what they make up, if they don't want to get a third party investigator, to me that's okay, if they have another alternative or solution, that's fine. ---- to respond or investigate, not respond, to investigate the accusations that were made. JC: Okay, we've got Debay, Ferryman, Steiner and then Vic and Carrey. Remember that order? I hope that I do. Now, let's keep it orderly here and move it along so we can get it done. Director Debay? Debay: I think at some point we need to define what type of investigation we're talking about based on experience in our own municipality. You can get up to half a million dollars taking depositions and interviewing witnesses. I think there needs to be a definition. Ferryman: I also feel it needs to be a third party consultant and not someone in-house. -12- JC: I have just been advised by legal counsel that due to the fact that this matter is moving in a little different direction than just setting it on an agenda for next exec meeting but, in fact, we are beginning to discuss and take action on something, we had better have a four-fifth's vote to add this on as an emergency item, assuming you can find it's an emergency item to do this this evening. Collins: I move that Director: Seconded Moreno: Point of discussion JC: Discussion Moreno: Would you consider this an emergency item? Directors: Discussion JC: He has a right to ask legal counsel what legal counsel feels? TLW: You can add an item on to the agenda if it was not, the requested action was not prepared for and added to the agenda within 72 hours. And, Director Collins has brought forth a whole new subject that we weren't aware of. If the Board makes the finding that in fact it's necessary to act upon it, then it can be added but it does require a four-fifth's vote. JC: Alright. We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? Barrera: If this is not an emergency item, what would the time frame be that it would come up under? JC: Well, what would happen is we could agendize it for the next board meeting. So it would be at the next board meeting, it would come up as an agendized item. Director Stanton? Stanton: Under discussion, Mr. Chairman, the motion is to call for a four-fifth's vote to add this to the agenda as an emergency item that is I think within the judgement of each one of us as to vote. For my own personal view on this, yes, it is. I think Mr. Collins made it very clear and I think it ought to be clear to all of us that if we want to keep seeing one article after another, getting one 20-page report after another answering things in the paper or if you want to get down to the facts to see if the procedures were correct or if they weren't correct and to take action accordingly if it is necessary, then we had better get on with it and I for one will --- -13- JC: Alright. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Let's have a role call vote on this if we could, Penny. Okay, let me do it this way. Is there any opposition to the motion? Opposition adding it on as an emergency item. (Directors Winchell, Brown, Partin, Nelson and Welch opposed by raising hands.) Motion carries adding it on as an emergency item. Now we will proceed with our discussion. Now we had gone with Director Debay, I think Director Steiner is next. Steiner: I feel on this issue is that I think Director Collins is saying that the EC could proceed and is authorized to proceed with an independent, outside consultant to address these issues or any other measures that they desire. What about the possibility that the EC, or a majority of the EC, would feel that the lengthy response by the General Manager satisfactorily answers the questions that have been raised by The Register? JC: Well, I think we all have our subjective feelings of whether it did or not. If the full Board decides that they want to do this other thing, I would assume as a Director on the EC that I'll do what they direct us to do even though I may not agree with it. Steiner: Because I am a member of the EC, if I felt the General Manager's was satisfactory and I so word that and a majority of the EC ---- that then that would obviously ---- JC: No. Not the way the motion is made. Leipzig: 1 support the idea that the EC Directors or General Manager's response was satisfactory for my own questions. If the EC can argue before this Board ----- rationale with an outside consultant to examine our procedures, then I would be happy to vote in favor of that. I would like to hear ----- explanation and analysis. Welch: My only comment is I think the idea is a terrific one, to get an independent view point in this respect. My concern is the cost or manner or type of investigation that is to take place by the consultant and I certainly wouldn't want our EC to go out and spend $500,000 to research these particular issues. It is my concern, the open-ended nature of the motion as it reflects cost. I would want the opportunity to vote on that. If the EC wants to spend $500,000 1 would like to have the opportunity to vote against it. Ferryman: I agree with what he just said but I think that perhaps the right approach would be to have the EC limit the scope of work, or determine the scope of what the investigation is going to be, both financially and the scope of work. I do still feel that it should be a third party independent consultant. Stanton: I agree with the concerns about the cost but I think, and again this is an -14- aside, a very quick aside, after reading the General Manager's report, I find I don't know, I'd like to sit down with those who disagree and go over this line by line, but I find that basically the memo pretty much confirms all of the figures that The Register in terms of the cost overruns, the total costs paid. It's just put in a way that it doesn't seem to, but if you start adding up the figures it hits right on almost word for word in terms of the money that we actually spent. So, again, with that as an aside, that is a major motivation why I think that we have to look at reporting procedures, the information we receive, what's happened in the past, the whole process of what we're spending. Cost Is an Important consideration. If you hire an outside person, we've got to agree to that part of the motion, but it's going to cost us some money. How much will it cost? I don't mean to be glib or flip about this but, you know, it's not going to cost $435,000 which is what we just paid for an Issue in legal fees that didn't even go into the court room. It went into arbitration. And we didn't get that money back. Now, how much more of that do we have to go through until we stop and say wait a minute. Let's get an independent look at this. Do you want to put a limit on this of $250,000 or $300,000, something like that? You know, John Collins would probably stop any change orders that would adjust that but, again, I'm not being sarcastic. It's not going to cost $435,000. But if you start adding up what we've spent because of the allegations and charges that have been made in that Register article, you know, whatever we spend on this is going to be a drop in the bucket compared to what is being questioned at this District right now. Steiner: 1 would just hope, Mr. Chairman, that when it comes to the EC that it is really well thought out in terms of scope of work, exactly what type of objectives we achieve and that fact that we are talking in some cases about different persons' perceptions and approach it in a very logical way, not open-ended ----. In fact that can be as dangerous as doing or just going off on a tangent. Collins: It is my Intention that if it does get to the EC, and certainly they will hear from the staff a review I suppose of pretty much what the General Manager has told us, maybe in a little bit more detail, to help them formulate a decision. If they cannot come to, and they certainly can't do everything at that one meeting, for example they couldn't go out and solicit proposals and start the interview process at that meeting, clearly. But If they came to a much different conclusion, they certainly would have the right to bring it back to this body and ask for another motion. If they find that action is required, that this motion that we now have in front of us gets that ball rolling without any further delay of having this -------. JC: Alright. What's your pleasure? Directors: Call for the question JC: Alright. Do you all remember what the question is? No? I didn't think you -15- did. Let's ask, what is the question? Collins: I would like that read back, please. Director: First one or second? JC: Third one Collins: The one that is on the floor. The one that we're considering. I have it written out but I also have it changed. Debay: I have a question. I'm living in a different place, maybe, than a lot of you. I don't take The Register so I have not read, maybe it's better. I'm beginning to wonder if we're running this Board or if The Register is? JC: I think the unfortunate thing in this whole thing is the Orange County Register does feel that they are going to whip-saw this Board and they have some of the Directors very candidly. I think that we need to keep in focus, folks, what this organization has been over the years and not all of a sudden because of accusations, and I will strongly disagree with Director Stanton and the fact that everything has been worn out that was in the Orange County Register, I have spent several hours at this District with staff since this happened. I have looked at the documents and I think it is a great aberration in the paper vs. what really happened. So, I disagree. Director Stanton? Stanton: Mr. Chairman, you know, I think that we've got records and haven't even seen what the problems are that we discussed for two hours in executive session. And we better dam well have that kind of discussion in open session here with all 40 Directors. When we're talking about metals(?) that are joined together, we're told it's been done for 30 years that way. And there are corrosion problems out there. We don't know when these things happen. I have to question and couldn't get an answer from staff. I finally had to tell the attorney to shut up and let the engineers answer the question in the last executive board session when I was told that they knew about this three years ago and I said you are just bringing this to us now in 1994? You're bringing this problem to us now when it has fallen out of warranty? Oh, well, we think we knew about it then. I think we mentioned it to you back in 1993. 1 still haven't found where it was mentioned in 1993. So, Mr. Chairman, when I see here Directors that don't even know what the problems are or what is going on or haven't even read one account of it let alone two accounts of it, and I've seen it from both sides. I've seen it in the executive session and I've seen it in The Register, and I've read this report where The Register is talking about a job is costing over a half-million dollars and it only starts out at $114,000 or $135,000, but then you add all these things on and it's the same price that we're talking about, you know, I'm really concerned that all of us -16- are on the same planet here as far as what these charges are. And I really resent you saying that any Directors are whip-sawed by The Register. That's just bullshit) JC: ---Roger, you're entitled to your opinion. I'm entitled to mine. I'm sorry that we don't agree. Director Collins? Collins: Would the Assistant Board Secretary find it helpful if I read the motion? ABS: I certainly would. Collins: I think I've got it right now, Penny. I'll give you a copy of this after the meeting. The motion is to direct the Executive Committee to consider at its next meeting all facts and accusations contained in The Register articles and to retain an independent consultant to undertake value (?) engineering and investigate issues set forth in The Register articles. The EC be authorized to solicit proposals and I would like to add. I just want to add one more thing. The intention of the motion, as Director Steiner has mentioned, if the EC came to a conclusion that this was something that they shouldn't do, they should come back to this Board. If the body of evidence presented to them is overwhelming they should not continue, they couldn't continue anyway at the next meeting. So if that's the way they wanted to go then they can do the scope of work and get on with the project and be authorized to do so by this Board. TLW: Director Collins, could I inquire? As I thought I heard it and took notes, it seems like it was somewhat contradictory. I read your motion as being to consider at the next meeting all facts and accusations set forth in The Register articles and to retain an independent consultant. But then you later said and then to solicit proposals. If you've authorized and directed the committee to, did you intend to have the EC go out and retain because..... Collins: Well, the EC when after they clearly come to the conclusion of reviewing the facts and cannot go out that night and do something, I've added the solicit of proposals as one of the first steps as going out and getting somebody. As I understand it, Tom, we've authorized not just to retain but to start the process going. If we don't need the statement of them authorizing solicit of proposals . . . TLW: That isn't my concern. My concern is that I thought I heard you say to direct the committee to consider the facts and then to, and to retain a consultant. Two points, one: the EC can be delegated but basically all of our contracts, as you know, come back here to the full Board for approval on whether to hire anyone rather than to the EC. So unless you specifically want to delegate the contractual authority to the EC there is an inconsistency. The other inconsistency was, as I read it, it said that to direct, for the committee to retain and then follow it up after you have retained them you are going to solicit proposals. I just that it was -17- inconsistent. I wanted to clarify it. Collins: If it is the proper format to stop and to retain. . . TLW: Or just to consider whether the consultant should be retained. . . Collins: Here is what I'm trying to do. I'm trying to get a small body, because we can't do it here evidently this evening, a small body of the executive board which is representative of this Board to listen to all of the facts. I think the facts have to be the answer. It's not a case of whether General Manager Sylvester's report was satisfactory or unsatisfactory. The facts have to be considered and there is a definite need in my mind to have an independent party come in, Not Directors because we, quite frankly, aren't smart to get into it, not the staff, not the attorneys, not anybody else that is attached to and associated with this Board. It has to be an independent, a pure, unbiased, unquestioned party to come in and do an analysis and present that analysis back to the Directors. Now that is what I want to get done and if I have failed to express that, then if you could put that, Tom, into better language to effect that, that is what I want. lend of tape) Partin: Where do you get the facts, John? From The Register or whoever gives the information to The Register? What facts are you talking about? The facts are the same facts that have been thrown out and blown up in a newspaper article because we are now involved in negotiations. Everything is bogged down. It makes the Districts look bad, its' Board of Directors look bad. Throw every bit of mud you can at it. The same thing is happening in my city with the police department. It is happening in a lot of municipalities. This is nothing new. I read those articles in The Register and trash them. As an engineer I've worked a lot of big projects and I know that you cannot ever in your wildest dreams hope to come in under what you budgeted for. Collins: You asked a lot of questions. The first question is where do I get the facts. I'm not sure. I'm not sure where the facts come from. I don't believe The Register has 100% facts. I'm not sure that we do as well. So what I want to do is get some independent party to come in here and say hey, we'll look at the accusations, we'll look at the response if they don't match up or, what I think may have happened because there are some things that I don't want to prejudge a little bit there, that the procedures are not affective procedures. I have a concern when the design engineer is the person who does the quality assurance part. And that is unfair to Tom, quite frankly, and to his department. I would rather see some procedural changes. And I believe that an independent party can come in here, that is the kind of thing we may get. And if they deal with more budgets, I don't know. I don't want to get that far down in front of us. But there are going to be some good, solid, independent recommendations made from whoever we can get. I assume we can get some independent people. -1 B- Partin: That may be a problem. Collins: It may be. But let's let the EC decide that. If the EC says there is no way we can get an independent party to do this, have them come back to us and make that recommendation. We've done business with almost every design engineer on the western seaboard, I assume. And it may be difficult to get a good design engineer to come. Or maybe we can get some independent auditor to go off and hire a design engineer or contractor or procedural person or administrator or whatever, and come in and give us some recommendations. 1 think it's time we do that. And I have some concerns. JC: Let me say this. I agree with where I think you are going, John. I feel that certainly our procedures in the past, because of the fact that we have chosen, and I think a lot of our new directors are not aware of this but we have chosen to have a small staff deliberately and to work through the procedures that we currently have and that is to go out, hire consultants and other people to do our work for us. I agree that I think maybe we need to analyze our practices and procedures and we may find that the recommendation of someone could be maybe we ought to change and maybe we should hire 50 engineers and do our own work. That might be the recommendation. I don't know. And then we have to struggle with that. I don't think that The Register article, while I disagree with a lot that's said, I still think that it doesn't mean that we should hide our heads in the sand and say well, just because it came out of The Register or whatever that there is nothing there. I am fully satisfied from my investigation that there is not a total truthfulness but that doesn't mean to say that I don't agree with looking at what our practices and procedures are and seeing if there is a better way to do it. 20120 hindsight is always great. We can always be critical after the fact. But, you know, we're in the trenches. They are in the trenches. We've got to understand that. i think if you're going in that direction where we're basically trying to look at our practices and procedures and see if there is a better way that we can do this, I don't think staff or anybody here will disagree with that. I think it is how are we getting there that is the problem. Collins: If I may, sir. I agree with what you said. I think we now have in front of us the incidence through at lease assume that will give us a leading indicator of where we should start looking to examine our procedures. If we do have difficulty, and please don't get me wrong. And nobody in the audience should get me wrong. I am not saying we do. I'm saying if we do have difficulties that at least the accusations that have been raised seem to be significant enough that they should be looked at and perhaps exposed so that procedural changes or staffing changes that we should make. Just as a quick add, I would also like to challenge the EC Directors to attend the New Directors' Orientation because I think it will be helpful to understand the plant and its facilities. -19- JC: I think everybody should attend it. I think if you haven't, you're cheating yourself. Director Stanton and then Director McGuigan. Stanton: Mr. Chairman, I think as a result of this what you have concluded and satisfied yourself might be a possible outcome. And in fact everybody might then agree with you. But just for Mr. Partin's purpose, one thing if you read that article, Mr. Woodruff, it locks like there have been certain documents obtained through The Register through a freedom of information search. Is that true or not? TLW: They didn't make a freedom of information search. Stanton: They asked for documents? TLW: Sure. The Register reporter is in the room tonight for those of you who didn't know that. He's been over here at the Districts, I don't know, 6, 8 or 10 times. He's been on the phone. We've given him response, we've attached-- Stanton: The answer is yes. That's all I want. A yes or no. So, you know, that little tiny _ was, why weren't we ever told that The Register reporter is over here in our files getting documents? Why weren't we told that? And second part, b, I'd like to see copies of the very documents that this District gave him so I can look at it with The Register article, I'll give you a copy of that, to see if there is match. I'd like to see those. As a matter of _, that has happened in my city, in my county. If there is an information search, we're notified and we're given the documents that were given to the press. As one Director, I will make that request. TLW: We have a log, I believe, of everything that the Register reporter requested, a copy of. He spent many hours here. He looked at, we handed over to him for his review something on the order of 100 or 150 manilla file folders, and they were of varying thicknesses, and he didn't make copies but looked and took his notes so we have no record -- Stanton: He has no copies of any documents? TLW: No, I said he requested copies and we made some copies and we have a log of everything he has a copy of and it's no problem, I'm sure, that staff and Board Secretary's office, we have, the District has a log of what was copied. Stanton: May we, as Directors, get copies of those documents copied by the reporter at the EC meeting? TLW: Of course. McGuigan: Mr. Chairman, I'm not sure of this. I'm not a member of the EC but -20- I'm not sure if I were whether I would have any idea specifically as to where you are going to go. Mr. Collins was mentioning about changing procedures and we're looking at something that did happen that maybe could have been misreported, perhaps. I'm concerned as to whether or not the EC going to have specific direction for deciding how to choreograph the proposals let alone what type of concern or_ we would be able to respond to. Hammond: Two points. First of all, it seems like we did call for the question and this was supposed to be only a definition of what the question was to be. JC: I think it's trying to clarify specifically what the words were or what the meaning of the words was, if you will. Hammond: Second point, my preference, and I don't know how John or anyone else would feel about this, but would be to direct the EC to define the scope of work, request proposals and bring those proposals back to the entire Board for final review. This would be a substitute motion. Seconded JC: Alright, we have a substitute motion. Did everyone hear that? Alright, Director Moreno. Moreno: JC: Okay, we have a substitute motion. Collins: I did not hear it, Mr. Chairman. JC: Okay, state the motion and then we'll go Hammond: I'll do my best to get it in the same way to direct the EC to define the scope of work, to request proposals and bring those proposals back to the entire board for authorization. Collins: So in other words, you are changing my motion is not referencing the accusations made by The Register so I'm not sure what proposals or what investigation you are talking about. Hammond: I think the EC may want to limit it to The Register accusations or may want to expand it somewhat depending upon other issues that might come up on their own sight between now and then and input that other Directors may pass on to the EC between now and then. -21- Welch: I think that's a real good idea. My question was going to be with regard to the original motion whether or not it included the delegation that Tom talked about to the EC of the authority to actually make and enter into a contract, not just solicit bids but to enter into a contract. I was going to object to that. I prefer the substitute motion. Sansone: I have a second substitute motion. What is going on is water over the damn. It has been answered by the General Manager. I suspect that from this point, and here's the motion, that we institute and authorize an audit of our operational and technical procedures. Seconded Director (?): No it isn't. I think the point he is trying to get through here is to forget about the articles in The Register. Hire the proper consultant to come in and review our procedures. All he has to do is take into account the articles in the paper and the response by the General Manager and make his determination. Ferryman: I agree. I think Director Sansone has gotten to the heart of the thing. That's where we need to be and I think that's where everyone's concerns are. Are we following the proper procedures and as John mentioned earlier, as far as ------ already authorized, so I agree with the substitute motion on the floor. JC: Alright, the substitute substitute motion. Further discussion? Alright, we're going to go for the substitute substitute motion. We all know what that is. Phil, state it again. Sansone: That we authorize the EC to employ an independent investigator/consultant to perform an audit on operational and technical procedures. JC: Alright and that's seconded. Under discussion let's go to Debay and then Barrera. Debay: I'm curious by what consists of an audit. What from the staff? What are you talking about? Are we going to look at every procedure book here? What do you mean by audit? Sansone: An operational audit, it is pretty well standard. We did this at the waste management commission and they tore us apart. An independent audit. They recommended changes on all different types of procedures and it was up to the commission and the board to agree to it, which they did and that is what I'm looking for here. Someone to come in independently and look at how and the way we are doing business and say is this the best way it can be done. Can it be done -22- better in a different way? Debay: How long did it take and how much did it cost? Sansone: I don't remember, Pat McGuigan, do you remember how much? McGuigan: I've been wracking my brains trying to think. I think it was at least half a million dollars. Barrera: Mr. Chairman, have we ever done and had any kind of an audit in the past in our history as to procedures. Was there one done ---? JWS: Not the type you are specifically talking about. The independent financial auditor checks our internal controls and, in fact, the Board just passed an action tonight to hire them to do an extension of that. But the type that you are talking about, no. Barrera: Could that be added to that particular same audit? JC: I don't know that they are the ones that should do it, Fred. Stanton: I would speak strongly against the substitute motion. It is a subset of the Hammond-Collins motion. It is a smaller portion of it. You might very well end up with looking at procedures that in fact have -- to have failed and adjust those procedures. The other thing I object to, with all due respect sir with regard to your motion, is you are saying that's water under the bridge. The whole issue is water that has been under the bridge that maybe we haven't seen go by and we want to go back and see what was happening over the last three years. I am totally against saying we'll just close the door on the time period from now past and we look at everything from this point on in the future, the whole point of what's being discussed now, when you look at these incidents, when you read the Directors' report, we're talking about past issues in terms of when we were told things, when we weren't told things, whether we are in warranty and what happened. The whole issue we just went through in the arbitration was passed. You can't say that you are going to cut off and forget this. You've got to look at this. The whole purpose, I think with John Collins' original motion and Barry's amendment thereof. JC: Alright, thank you. Director Gullixson, Director Collins and then Director Sansone: Sansone: I'd like to withdraw my motion. JC: Alright, the motion has been withdrawn. -23- Gullixson: I'm in support of the substitute motion because I think it approaches the EC and it allows them the flexibility with a broad brush to narrow the issue itself and bring it back to the Board ------- I think the EC needs the flexibility right off the bat and let them have the broad brush approach to bring the issue back. JC: Alright. One last vote. We did have a hand and then we'll go to the vote. Director Collins? Collins: My concern is to combine both efforts here. And I understand my concern when I made the motion to begin with was not just to come up with better procedures, which I think would be the offshoot of doing this, but whether we like it or not, we have accusations that have been made against us or our position. They have to be responded to. We represent millions of people in this county who have a right to know what our response is to those accusations. And the accusations' response can best come, from a credibility state anyway, from an Independent person. If you rate all of these things down and each accusation, and even if we give our response to the Register and say that's not true, they said this, so forth, I would rather have it come from an independent party that says here is the accusation and here are the facts. The accusation is wrong or the accusation has some merit and here is something that can come from a procedural change to preclude it from happening in the future. JC: John, let me ask you a question. I'm going to abstain, by the way, on all of these motions because I don't think they are an emergency, but let me just say this. Do you think that you could listen to the responses that would be given by the staff to these particular accusations and determine whether they are right or wrong? Collins: Could I listen to them? Absolutely. JC: Do you think you could understand if somebody, if you were to read a letter that basically said something totally different than the article in the newspaper, do you think you could read and understand that? Collins: I would have a tough time understanding some of these issues. JC: I think, to be honest with you, I've gone through this with the staff. I think any of us could understand them. I do. I think any of us could understand those Issues. Alright, that simple. I don't have a lot of expertise myself, as you know, but nonetheless I tell you I've sat down, I've looked at the documents, I've talked with staff, I've asked the questions and I think that you could understand where everything truly is. And I would say that to any Director in this room. So, you know, I don't know right now, very honestly, that we need to hire somebody to do an investigation of every allegation in The Register. I do feel that there are maybe -24- some things that we ultimately may want to change. Not because it is wrong, but it might be better. But I think I'd give yourself a chance first to listen to what the staff has to say and to find out if, in fact, there's really any merit to all of this stuff. And if you feel after that that there is, move on with it. Or if you feel that it is too technical and you can't understand it, move on with it. Collins: Mr. Chairman, you have said so often we can have a difference of opinion and I believe we have one now. Because I don't believe, I don't have an engineering background and some of the other backgrounds that would be required to fully understand and comprehend all of the answers. JC: I don't think it takes that. Collins: Well, I do because of some of the things ---- the engines for the last year or so and some of the other technical issues. If staff came up and said it was blue, I would have to be totally at the mercy of staff saying trust me, I've looked into and it's not the case. JC: This stuff wasn't just listening to staff. This was reading documents. Debay: I was going to ask if it would be better to schedule an additional meeting to do just exactly what you suggested. For two years I have been sitting here taking the advice of the EC not knowing the facts so maybe it's time you involved all the Directors and do exactly what you just suggested. Stanton: Mr. Chairman, with regard to a very special comment of discussion between you and Mr. Collins, I don't think the issue is who is smart and who isn't smart. I think the issue is independence, as called by his motion. JC: Alright, we have a motion and a second on the floor. We're going to go with it. Repeat the motion, the second motion. This is the substitute motion. Hammond: Penny, do you have it written down? ABS: The motion is to direct the EC to define the scope of work, request proposals, and bring the proposals back to the Board for final review. JC: Alright, we have a motion and a second for that. Hammond: regarding the allegations that have recently been made ABS: Excuse me and to allow the EC to limit it to The Register article or expand it, if possible, with other input from other Directors -25- TLW: Scope of work to include The Register article Hammond: Right, but not limited to Stanton: to include but not limit to JC: We have a motion and a second. I will abstain. The motion carries. We will now go into closed session. #13 JWS: Mr. Dawes, the question was if there's a problem if the contract under item 13 was continued for 60 days? TMD: The bids allow a 60 days from the opening. I believe the opening was February list so a 60 days continuation, a 30 day might get us.... I'm sure the contractor, if we ask him would give us more time also. ?: ------ direct that the contractor give us more time and otherwise ---- a 30 day. JC: Well, ok. Barrera: In comments, when the contractors------- JC: Go ahead, Fred. Barrera: I said would this ------- with this contractor the one that we just did the --- and everything was fine. TLW: We have used this contractor here on a number of our jobs and the jobs from a construction point of view have always come in on time and within budget and the quality of their work has been excellent. In terms of accidents, we have no reported accidents from this contractor either. JC: Further discussion? JC: Alright, in discussing with General Counsel. Maybe two things we need; first off is if you want to cancel or undo the prior action, we need a motion and a second to do that. Secondarily, we need clarification of what it is specifically we are going to do, just wait 60 days or what? ?: I think parliamentary rules are that we consider the motion that automatically --- --- the previous motion. -26- TLW: Well, that is I like when you have something like this I like the record to be as thorough and complete as possible and so the effect is of reconsideration does that. I just want everyone is aware of what it would be doing if that is what your intent and decision is that you effectively cancel the prior action earlier and reinstate the item on the agenda. Ferryman: Are we trying to achieve something within the 60 day period? Is there going to be a closure on this other issue within the 60 days period that is going to determine whether we are going to go forward with this contract? JC: I don't know how to answer that. TLW: I don't know how to answer that either. As the Chairman, I am not sure what direction I am given or anybody else is given as to what we can come back with. ?: The reason I said 60 days is pulling off of thin air. I thought this was an on-going investigation and information is evolving would be provided the Districts in this tragedy and maybe in another month or two we would have a better comfort level as whether Pascal & Ludwig would ----- called for or not. We may not have an answer and I guess we have to deal with it at that time. ------- a little bit more time. I mean rather than approve a million dollar contract tonight for something that is ...... JC: There is an alternate to that too but ... Director Hammond? Hammond: I was just going to clarify what I thought John's motion was. I thought his motion was simply to rescind the action, to continue with a minimum of 30 days and discuss with the contractor the option of ------ a total of 60 days to give us the opportunity to see what future information might come to light regarding ----- of the contractor and the accident before we actually let him contract again and the motion was seconded. Fred jumped in but I did second it. JC: Ok, in discussion, Tom what would the problem be if we just didn't approve this at all but rejected all bids? Where are we going to stand if we don't go forward with this project? Because if we are looking at 60 days from the date the bids were opened we have to be done before our next meeting. There has to be a decision because by that time the 60 days will have run. TMD: There should be no reason why you couldn't reject these bids. There is nothing urgent on this job. It is a repair type job, fixing things up, issues like that. It is not standing on a critical path with respect to any other work so the bids could be rejected. -27- JC: Well, the thing is that the bids are good for 60 days from the date they are opened. If they would extend it, that would be fine. But, it is either that. If we don't, then we could reject them. The thing is the 60 days will not occur until after, it will occur before our next Board meeting. There were opened February 1st, I believe was the comment. March, April. They were opened on February 1st. It will be April. Gullixson: I withdraw my previous motion. I move that we reject all bids. JC: Alright, we have a withdrawn. Do we have a second to the motion? Alright. ?: Does this action tonight might discredit us our Sanitation Districts with respect to cases that might come up with regards to the accident. ----- the next bid, with rejecting him cause some suspicion that he was not a good contractor when very well satisfied with his work all of these years. Now we come in and say well, we reject him because we don't really trust him now. Why did we have him on board in the first place if we know feel that way? I don't think this is a good action if we are trying to ----- rejecting this bid or even rejecting them all because it is going to get out what we have done. The guy has the next job coming and we decide he may not be as good as we thought he was so we might suffer some liability from that viewpoint. In my opinion, I don't think it is a good thing. Debay: I was just trying to listen to the reverse side of the coin as it turns out that we are responsible and now no contractor will work for us. I don't know what we are trying to accomplish by this. JC: Director Collins, Stanton and Barrera. Collins: As I understand it, the basis for refusing the acceptance of the bids is getting them all back. The fact that they had, this company has an OSHA site against them. TLW: I would strongly urge and recommend that you do not make such a finding because a) we do not have the OSHA findings b) that is not basis upon which you would want to reject it. We have in the notice of inviting bids the absolute discretion to reject all bids without cause if you want to make it. If you want to reject them that would be to way to do it because otherwise you would make a prejudicial finding for which we really have facts to support it. Collins: That is my point because this is certainly not a criteria of selecting people so turning them all back for basically no reason kind of concerns me. Directors: Me too. -28- Stanton: Mr. Chairman, sir, may I get clarification on what I thought Mr. Dawes said and if I am wrong I will admit error in hearing. I thought Mr. Dawes said we could go 30 days and during that time discuss with the contractor if he would be willing to agree to a further delay? TMD: I said that; I am thinking now; I may be a few days off because the Board meeting is (Tape ended) Stanton: Thank you, sir, I did hear and ....... JC: Director Barrera and then Director Gullixson. Barrera: There were two people killed and probably until we find out what happened I think we should hold this thing up. This may be a great contractor but something went wrong that is very serious. Gullixson: The reason for bringing the motion to ----- I had a little concern with whether the subcontractor or we willing to take the steps necessary to insure a safe place to work and are we having appropriate safety meetings and safety supervisor in inherently dangerous situations involved. I think in 30 days we can ask those questions, have staff come back so we can feel that things are being looked at from that safety perspective because essentially what Mr. Spradlin said was that we are exposed to liability in these situations when reasonable call for certain safety measures and we have to take them. The question is whether or not we protected ourselves by putting in writing, factually I think there is some other exposure but since this is not a contract that is required to be done right now and since we don't have to ----, I think we should review the questions about safety, 30 and 60 days to ask reasonable questions before we award the contract. Leipzig: Has any of the work to be done by this contractor ----------- working in close spaces? TMD: Not certain right now. Almost all of our contracts we have to go into confined spaces. JC: I believe that, correct me if I am wrong, that Dan said that they had been working in that ditch 3 or 4 times and at one time they did have monitoring equipment in there and decided they didn't need it anymore and this time they didn't have it. I believe that is what he said. Saltarelli: I agree with Director Gullixson. I think his last comment hit it right on the head. It is not that we are taking any action on any particular contractor at this time. Because this job was a very serious accident as Mr. Barrera said , I think 30 days to review our procedures and things like that certainly make alot of sense. -29- I think the motion should be based on as Director Gullixson just said. JC: So the concern then so I can understand it is, your concern is not so much as going forward with the contractor but it is concern that do we have a safe working environment? Gullixson: Safe work environment and have we documented the safety requirements necessary to eliminate our liability if someone is hurt on the workplace who is employed by the subcontractor. JC: Director Partin and then McGuigan. Partin: I think this is a very dangerous time in possible future litigation coming up about this to be doing anything with respect to investigation our in-house safety precautions and procedures. It may need to be done but I don't think that this very moment we should be broaching that subject. McGuigan: The motion as I understand it is to reject all bids? JC: That is the motion. JC: Let me just say another point was just raised by General Counsel and that is that if time 30, 60 or whatever days would make a difference what could happen now is Tom could talk to them and see if they would be willing to continue this matter for a period of months at their agreement and if in fact.., excuse me. Stanton: I'm sorry, sir. JC: Excuse me, I am sure what you have to say is more important than what I have to say. Stanton: That is what Dawes said before. JC: But again it has been pointed out that if in fact the contractor does not wish to continue this matter to a time that we feel would be reasonable that is going to lapsed any way after 60 days. We could do that and if in fact that happens then there is nothing that we have accepted. We have to go back out for bids again so we can do it either way but again I bring it up only because it just suggested to me. I think either way it goes, it would work. The motion on the floor currently is to reject all bids. TLW: If I could add one point that I know has been raised by Directors before. By rejecting all bids means that we would have to go back and republish and incur those costs. Second thing is this bid came in $300,000 below estimate so it is a -30- very attractive bid for the benefit of the Districts. I was suggesting that if you want the time and I think that makes good sense to take the 30 or 60 days to get the investigation. If you simply don't act on it and if Pascal & Ludwig doesn't agree to extending the award by 60 days then he lost the bid anyway and we won't have the bid to anybody. We will be back and we will go out for new bids. If he does agree to it and within 60 days the Boards determine we will or we won't award it to them, you preserve the option of at least of preserving a good bid as well as having your investigation. Debay: May I ask the engineers or technical people here if they are concerned about this company? TMD: This company has had a 5 or 6 jobs with us over the last several years; mostly smaller jobs under $1 million and I have never heard from our people that they are unsafe, notwithstanding the terrible accident that took place but I haven't heard any reports of that. Gullixson: It is not a question of whether they are unsafe, it is a question of whether we are unsafe to the point that we pose ourselves liability. I withdraw my motion and move that we continue, if you think we can get away with that ---------- (very loud cough that wiped it out) and award it within 60 days anyway. JC: Alright, we have a new motion. Any discussion? We have a second. Any discussion? Any opposition to the motion? Alright, thank you. -31- 03/09/94 JOINT BOARD MEETING #3 - Appointment of Chairman pro tern District 3 - Director Wally Linn was appointed Chairman pro tem for District 3 due to Chairman and Chairman pro tem being absent. #5 - Public Comments JC: 1 have two people who have indicated a willingness to speak. The first is Ellen Ray and then David L. Hamilton. Customary time limit is five minutes. Ellen Ray: I am on the employees' bargaining committee for the Operations and Maintenance Employees. I would like to ask that you read and consider the packet given to you tonight by the negotiating committee. If you haven't received this packet, one of your employees, Joe Park, has one in the corner there for you. We have been negotiating in good faith since September 14, 1993. From the start we were told there was no Districts' money available for anything. We accepted this as truth. Then we were told there was some money but it is only for those employees who work a 12-hour shift. Something is wrong here, folks. We want to reach an agreement with the Districts and we ask your support in achieving this goal. Thank you very much. David L. Hamilton: Good evening everybody. I hope this is the last time I am going to have to be here this year. I hate to waste your valuable time but there is a necessity for it and that's why I'm here. We, like some of you, are skeptical to the amount of information you receive. We read in the newspapers like everybody else. This is very, very important to us. This could be our livelihood for quite a while here. I say our because I represent to your people here. We want to make sure that you see what our last proposal is because we've been told that this proposal can't come back to the Board and a few of the people that make the decision, we believe it should come back to you. We're not very far apart monetarily. You can afford where we are at, I am sure. We've looked at your budget and there is nothing that separates us from coming to an agreement as far as the monetary issues are concerned. We are very, very close folks. We don't need to argue over pennies. Most of our issues are not really cost issues. They are issues of very much importance to us but they don't cost you anything. We understand the political motivation of this Board but I think it's time for you to stop and put politics aside and say, "these are your people. These are what they deserve. The hell with politics. These are people that work hard for a living. They do a damn good job and they should be rewarded thusly". -1- r Look at this proposal carefully and give us a response that we know is from you. We want to know what your response. Give us that indication. Remember, these people do work hard, are very competent and they are your employees and your constituents. 1 will be available if anyone has any questions later or if you have now, please don't be afraid to ask. #6(a) - Joint Chairman's Report JC: This evening we are going to present some plaques and resolutions to retiring Directors. As you know, several of our Directors recently retired from the Boards and we would like to acknowledge their efforts with the presentation of a plaque and a resolution expressing the Boards' appreciation for their outstanding service. Over the years these Directors have not only performed their duty as City Council or Sanitary District members with a high degree of professionalism and dedication, but they have also been equally involved in the wastewater management program and the Sanitation Districts. I would like Bob Bell, I think Bob was not going to be here but Barry, I think you were going to take Bob's plaque. Jim Evans (JC presented resolution; VJC presented plaque). Mr. Evans stated it was a pleasure working with the Districts. Jim Silva (JC presented resolution; VJC presented plaque). Mr. Silva thanked the staff. Also thanked the elected body and working with them. JC: I don't believe that Director Eva Miner, Gail Kerry, Maria Moreno, Rob Richardson or Hank Wedaa are here. We'll make presentations to them later. Upcoming Meetings: Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, March 16th, at 5:30 p.m. The Executive Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, March 23rd, at 5:30 p.m. I would like to ask Jan Debay and Barry Denes to be there. Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, March 30th at 5:30 p.m. #6(b) - Report of the General Manaaer JWS: As you know, we are having a New Directors' Orientation and Treatment Plant Tour. It has been scheduled for Saturday, March 19th from 9:00 a.m. to -2- 1:30 p.m. We have sent information to all of you and a form. Those of you who have not yet returned the RSVP form, we put another copy in your folders tonight. So that we could do the proper planning, I would appreciate it if you could complete this form and either leave it in your folder or with the clerk this evening. Some of you who may have a conflict, we'll try to schedule maybe a follow-up orientation and tour in a month or so. This is called a New Directors' Orientation and Tour but all Directors are encouraged to attend. That completes my report. #6(c) - Report of the General Counsel TLW: There is just one item. There is a supplemental agenda item for District No. 1. The District received a Summons and Complaint today and I think the Chairman is going to add that to the agenda just prior to going into closed session. Other than that I have no report. #9d - Consent Calendar JC: I would just like to point out for the record that as the agenda was written there was a mistake on Item 901(2), the resolution number in the agenda should be 94-35-6. It was correct in your packet but just so that you understand if you notice the discrepancy on that item. Is there anyone that would like to remove any items from the Consent Calendar? Director John Collins: Mr. Chairman, item #9d, please. We are being asked to approve four new vehicles, one of them going to the motor pool, one going to operations, one going to planning and design and one going to construction management. I would like to move the two vehicles, the motor pool vehicle and operations vehicle, and hold back on the other two vehicles. I find no substantiation for these vehicles. I have no complaint on the prices involved. I think they are good prices. I met with the Department Head that these vehicles are to be assigned to and I still do not have a clear substantiation, cost-effective or use of those vehicles so I would like to ask that they be removed and those two vehicles come back with a better description to the Directors. I think at this time we're spending a lot of money on things we ought to be very careful that we know exactly where it's going. If it is appropriate at this time I would like to move the passage of Item 9(d) to include only the two vehicles going to the motor pool and operations. Second. Director Pickier: Does that affect the price of the two vehicles? JWS: These are purchased under the State procurement contract. The only reason it might be affected is if there is a deadline that we can't meet if we bring -3- them back at a later date. It is a per vehicle price, however. TMD: The vehicle for the planning and design would be a third vehicle in that group. There are 24 people in the group and they share two vehicles now. When they don't have these, they go to the motor pool and get some out. This would add a third vehicle. The vehicle for the construction management would be used by the supervisors in Construction Management. There was a pick-up truck that I found after 1 talked with Director Collins that was given to the guards and that is what it is really replacing. Director Moreno: Are the vehicles really needed? TMD: We've had an orderly program to replace vehicles to try to keep good vehicles needed, but we can certainly wait. Stanton: I would like to ask what our policy is as far as personal use of these cars. Are any of your employees taking cars home? TMD: Yes. In the Construction Management group there is probably four or five supervisors who take the vehicles home. In the design group there is one supervisor that takes a vehicle home. Stanton: At some point, consider it a request, I would like to see a list of how many people are allowed to take Districts' vehicles home and also I understand from some preliminary questions that were asked by some of my staff that you need some of these to just go from plant to plant or drive around the plant? TMD: We use them for, the people who get the vehicles such as these are those who go out of the plant or go between plants. The inspectors and people within the plant use electric golf carts or bikes. Rice: You said that if they need a car and over the two that they go to the car pool and get one. How many cars do you have in the car pool? TMD: I don't know that. Mr. Hodges would know. EH: The question is how many cars do we have in the motor pool? Rice: Yes EH: We have approximately six sedans, three or four pick-ups and -4- Ferryman: Does the District have a policy where all departments as far as who gets to take the car home or is it a haphazard thing from department to department? JWS: Our policy is that those people who are most likely to be called back for an emergency are those that are assigned a vehicle that they can take home. Lutz: Is there a policy or are people using their own car and being reimbursed for their mileage? TMD: Yes, they are being reimbursed. Lutz: Is that a norm or is the norm to get a Districts car? TMD: We want them to take a Sanitation Districts car if one is available and only use their own car if nothing is available. Lutz: And, the reason being? TMD: I think it is insurance. Stanton: Is either one or the other or both of these two cars that are excluded by Director Collins motion in that category of cars that might be taken home used for personal use? TMD: Yes, one of them would replace the Construction Managers car and he would be giving his to someone else and he would drive that home. Barrera: Regarding sedans - having to use pickups and I would also like to know call back for emergency. How many times a month does that happen; how often do these emergencies happen where they have to come back here that would demand a car? JWS: I don't have those numbers with me. Perhaps one of the department heads could speak for their own department. Barrera: A report? JWS: We could do that. Debay: Two questions - if these two cars are deleted, would this affect our performance at all and the second question is, you mentioned insurance? Does this place us at any risk to use a personal car? Are we risking something? -5- TMD: If the cars are deleted we can continue throughout Engineering. I can't answer the insurance question. TLW: Maybe I can comment on that. I think the Directors may know the Districts are entirely self-insured. We have no liability insurance and that is based on a policy of valuation that has been made and in place for a number of years. We have a very substantial contingency reserved money for liability and it has proven to be very economically beneficial to the Districts to do. The policy is generally to discourage individuals from using their own car for two reasons. One, if the Individual uses his own car, he really has an obligation to personally report it to his insurance company that his car will now be used for business purposes and therefore his policy will be re-rated from personal use to business use. His premium will go up so the Districts would be faced with either forcing the individual to absorb a cost (which is really a Districts cost) or to reimburse that individual. Secondly, you have a liability question when the individual is using his car, whether his insurance should be called upon to respond in damages or whether the Districts have to step in and leads to a legal tussle as to who should be at fault primarily to answer to any such complaint so the policy has been to really very very narrowly limit the use of the private vehicles. Pickier: I guess in looking at these four. The first two are to replace and I read the last two as additional. I don't think they have given us a good reason of why they need two additional now. If they were replacing, I can understand. I think Collins has a valid point that they come back and give us some good reasons for needing the additional vehicles or they are replacing some vehicles, I think we should know that. Gullixson: Is there any reason why we shouldn't wait for the report to place an order for all four? If we decide to do it eventually, do it all at once? Hodges: The state contract for sedans - the drop dead date for purchasing these vehicles is March 15 or 17. If we waited a month we would miss that window of opportunity. We did go out and make sure that the prices are an acceptable price. We did go out and solicit some bids from the private Industry and found that on the average the costs of these sedans was around $1,800 - $2,000 a piece higher for an equivalent sedan. JC: Further discussion? We have a motion and a second on the floor. Call for the question. JC: Any opposition to the motion? Motion passes - unanimous consent. -6- #11 - Summary Financial Reoort Hart: On the first page under "Other Reserves". Is that ------ individual Districts --- -----? GGS: There was a white staff report that accompanied this article. There is a summary on the front and then the individual financial statements are attached to that. The question is, as I understand it, is on the first page, the numbers that have come from the budget document that was approved approximately a year ago. All of those reserves, the construction reserves and the other reserves are held in the individual Districts. None of those reserves are held in any joint reserve or in any place like that. Those are appropriated for various things - debt service, operating requirements, dry period requirements, insurance, things of that sort. #12(b) - KPMG and "Bin Six" JC: Director Stanton will be reflected as an abstention. #13 - Job Nos. P1-48: P2-47-2: P2-56 and P2-53-2 TMD: This project is a combination of four smaller projects and includes various repairs of equipment and replacement of older equipment in plants. It includes safety items such as installing new handrails around the plants and as the Directors are aware, you have authorized an extensive seismic rehabilitation program and it includes two buildings at Plant No. 2, seismic strengthening of those buildings. On February 1st we received four bids for this project ranging from the low submitted by Pascal and Ludwig of $1,003,899.00 to a high of $1,774,430.00. The recommended action is to approve two addenda which changed the bid date and clarified a miscellaneous issues and to award to low bidder, Pascal and Ludwig in the amount of $1,003,899.00. Barrera: Has this contractor done work for us before? TMD: Yes, this contractor has worked for us and is working for us presently. (Tape Ended) #16 - Supplemental Agenda JC: I think what I will do is I will advance the item that we had which was a supplemental item this evening for District No. 1 before we go into closed session. TLW: The item for District No. 1 is the district had a construction project about a -7- year for a pipeline project known as the Memory Lane Interceptor. It was a joint project between the City of Orange, City of Santa Ana and the Districts. During the course of excavation there was some ----- as the result of some storms last winter. The complaint is for some property damage. It is not a significant dollar amount. We have an indemnity provision with the general contractor, Mladen Buntich. In addition, since we had this claim in we negotiated as part of the final closeout agreement a supplemental indemnification with the contractor. While we do have to appear and defend the Districts we will probably succeed immediately and have the contractors insurance company take over the defense at no cost to the Districts. I think we passed over item 16(a). In order to take the action as set forth in 16(b) in the Supplemental, we first need a motion to add it to the agenda. This was just received today and we only have 30 days in which to file the answer in Superior Court. JC: Deemed approved. Now we will go for the recommended action. McGuigan: Has this work been completed so it will not delay this completion for the whole project? TLW: Where this location is done, this job has been done in this area for six months. Barrera: Being in the City of Orange, I would like to know what the damages will be and what it was? TLW: The location is at the corner of Parker and La Veta and there was an excavation adjacent to the freeway underpass and at the time of the excavation the contractor struck a water line that was owned by the City of Orange. It was not known at the time and apparently it caused some subsidence. Then there was an open trench, a fairly trench, this pipe was 34 to 36 feet deep. He had a "glory hole" there. The storms came and flooded it and didn't realize there was a crack in the water line. It resulted in the adjacent condominium that is an apartment condominium project and they claimed that some of their patio slabs have sunk and the patio walls cracked. The complaint is very unique; it talks about a 1/16 inch crack in the walls. We tried immediately and the contractor tried immediately to just walk it. In fact, the contractor did enter the site and did make repairs on several patio slabs directly adjacent to Parker Street. This is a follow-up to that and Mladen Buntich has assumed the role of picking up. Barrera: Attorneys ?? -B- TLW: I really can't be sure. I think he was going back several months ago when the claims came in. As I recall, it seems that we had some conversations; not me personally but someone from my office. JC: Deemed approved. #14 - Closed Session TLW: The purpose of the closed session is for two reasons. One, the District management representatives wish to review the status of labor negotiations between the Districts employee groups and the Directors. Secondly, the Districts has reason to believe that there is a potential for a claim to be filed against the Districts as a result of an accident at the Treatment Plant No. 2. Stanton: I just want it real clear before we adjourn for the closed session that we are not going to be engaged in any discussion of whether newspaper reports are or are not correct. As far as I'm concerned any discussion of that nature should be done in full public session. JC: You are correct. They will not be discussed. However, there would be two of them probably that would have to be discussed in closed session that involve litigation if we were to talk about them. The only thing we are going into closed session now for are these two matters. Stanton: I am just registering my own personal objection. If we are in closed session and we get into those things which I think, as one individual, everyone else can speak for themselves, should be discussed in open session. JC: Fine. No disagreement. Director Collins? Collins: Mr. Chairman, I had spoken to you previous to this meeting about a motion that I would like to make regarding this. Since we are not going to be discussing this item in closed session, would it be appropriate to make this motion? JC: You can do it now. Collins: I would like to make a motion that the Boards direct the Executive Committee (EC) to consider at its next meeting whether to retain an independent consultant to undertake value engineering and investigate the issues set out in the Register newspaper article. If the EC approves the hiring of a consultant that they (the EC) be authorized to solicit proposals from that consultant. JC: Why don't we go ahead and set it on the agenda, John and move at that? By -9- the order of the Chair, it will be set on the agenda? Collins: I would like to make it a motion that will take the onus off of you, Bill. JC: I don't have any onus. Fine, we have a motion and a second. Stanton: Maker of the motion, I would strongly support that motion if it is very clear that the consultant is reporting to the Directors and not to the staff or Legal Counsel. Collins: Yes, that would be my idea. I think the words do so say. JC: I think, John, what you are saying is it is to be discussed in the EC in regards to this and we are not going to necessarily, you can certainly, Director Stanton, speak your mind at the EC, but nonetheless I think the motion is let's discuss it and decide if we are going to do it and if so, then the second part was that we would be authorized to go ahead and proceed with an RFP. Collins: The EC would be pre-authorized if they so decided to go ahead and start interviewing the consultant because I don't want to delay here and wait for another meeting, have to come back before us and then we go back to them. Perhaps it would be the pleasure of the EC to even form a further subcommittee from its members to go out and interview these people to make it happen fast. I think it is in the best service of all the Directors, employees and staff as well as the constituents to get this matter resolved in a very timely and equitable fashion. JC: Agreed. Director Stanton? Stanton: Mr. Chairman, if you could just clarify for me. It is my understanding the motion as to whether we should or should not embark on this is to, and that issue is to be decided by this entire board, did I misunderstand you sir that the EC would be deciding that? JC: I believe the motion was that the EC would discuss whether or not we would do it and if, in fact, they decided that it would be done that they would have the authorization to go out for an RFP. Isn't that what you said, John? Collins: I feel comfortable, Mr. Stanton, that the EC can make that decision. I feel comfortable with that. JC: Alright, we're in discussion. Director Moreno? Moreno: I think all of us should make that decision ------ -10- Leipzig: I would appreciate that coming back to the Boards, the full Boards as well. I would like to hear the rationale, the value of the engineering study, the type of consultant analysis of which I am not personally familiar with so it is not clear to me the tactics to be achieved by that consultant study. Collins: The benefits that I see being achieved, Victor, would be the fact that the EC is going to be empowered to make the decision and go out and hire somebody. This is what I'm looking at. We can't do that. I don't care, we can do it but it's going to be going to the Executive Board, get recommendations, have them come back and say okay, go out and hire somebody, and we're talking two, three, four months down the road. JC: And that is assuming that the EC says let's hire somebody. The EC may choose otherwise but I just need to say that so the Directors understand it. Maybe the better way to do this, John, is to have the EC discuss it and recommend back to the Boards. Director 1?): I support that. JC: I'm not making that as a motion. I'm just asking John. Collins: 1 would prefer that the EC, and I feel comfortable if they will go ahead and decide to go ahead and hire somebody. I feel comfortable that they should start right away and get the ball rolling. If we bring it back to this Board, it's another month, 30 days down the road. More articles may be written, more accusations may be taken. I want to get this thing resolved in the fastest way possible and if somebody has a better way to do it and have it done faster, I'm looking for that. Stanton: Again, Mr. Chairman, Mr. Collins, when we vote now as an entire Board are we authorizing the EC to move forth and do that? Collins: Yes sir. Stanton: Okay. So it's not decided by the EC if the entire Board of Directors says yes, let's go with an outside consultant then the EC starts that ball rolling at the next meeting. They might decide not to do it. Collins: That's not really the words that are in the motion. JC: Well, let's clear it then. Collins: I would be happy to and I thank you for your consideration. I would be happy to say that that is the way it can be. We are authorizing the EC to get the ball rolling to go off and interview people and start the process. -11- JC: So you are saying here that we are agreeing that we are going to go that way and there will be no discussion in exec session then regarding whether we will or will not. Collins: Yes JC: Alright. That's a new motion? Collins: That's a change. If it pleases the second of that motion, I don't know who seconded. Director ?: It pleases the second. JC: Alright, we have a motion and a second. Okay, discussion. Gullixson: So what the EC is going to do is going to come up with the how. The how to approach the issue, right? Directors: No JC: Now let's make sure. We have a motion that's being made. Let's make sure we understand what it is. John, what specifically is it that you are thinking this motion is? �j Collins: I believe that now that the motion has changed ----- second change and !, further changed. My motion is to direct the EC to start the process of investigating the accusations made by The Register's article and to, if necessary, this is what they make up, if they don't want to get a third party investigator, to me that's okay, if they have another alternative or solution, that's fine. ---- to respond or Investigate, not respond, to investigate the accusations that were made. JC: Okay, we've got Debay, Ferryman, Steiner and then Vic and Carney. Remember that order? I hope that I do. Now, let's keep it orderly here and move it along so we can get it done. Director Debay? Debay: I think at some point we need to define what type of investigation we're talking about based on experience in our own municipality. You can get up to half a million dollars taking depositions and interviewing witnesses. I think there needs to be a definition. Ferryman: I also feel it needs to be a third party consultant and not someone in-house. -12- JC: I have just been advised by legal counsel that due to the fact that this matter is moving in a little different direction than just setting it on an agenda for next exec meeting but, in fact, we are beginning to discuss and take action on something, we had better have a four-fifth's vote to add this on as an emergency item, assuming you can find it's an emergency item to do this this evening. Collins: I move that Director: Seconded Moreno: Point of discussion JC: Discussion Moreno: Would you consider this an emergency item? Directors: Discussion JC: He has a right to ask legal counsel what legal counsel feels? TLW: You can add an item on to the agenda if it was not, the requested action was not prepared for and added to the agenda within 72 hours. And, Director Collins has brought forth a whole new subject that we weren't aware of. If the Board makes the finding that in fact it's necessary to act upon it, then it can be added but it does require a four-fifth's vote. JC: Alright. We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? Barrera: If this is not an emergency item, what would the time frame be that it would come up under? JC: Well, what would happen is we could agendize it for the next board meeting. So it would be at the next board meeting, it would come up as an agendized item. Director Stanton? Stanton: Under discussion, Mr. Chairman, the motion is to call for a four-fifth's vote to add this to the agenda as an emergency item that is I think within the judgement of each one of us as to vote. For my own personal view on this, yes, it is. I think Mr. Collins made it very clear and I think it ought to be clear to all of us that if we want to keep seeing one article after another, getting one 20-page report after another answering things in the paper or if you want to get down to the facts to see if the procedures were correct or if they weren't correct and to take action accordingly if it is necessary, then we had better get on with it and I for one will --- -13- JC: Alright. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Let's have a role call vote on this if we could, Penny. Okay, let me do it this way. Is there any opposition to the motion? Opposition adding it on as an emergency item. (Directors Winchell, Brown, Partin, Nelson and Welch opposed by raising hands.) Motion carries adding it on as an emergency item. Now we will proceed with our discussion. Now we had gone with Director Debay, I think Director Steiner is next. Steiner: I feel on this issue is that I think Director Collins is saying that the EC could proceed and is authorized to proceed with an independent, outside consultant to address these issues or any other measures that they desire. What about the possibility that the EC, or a majority of the EC, would feel that the lengthy response by the General Manager satisfactorily answers the questions that have been raised by The Register? JC: Well, I think we all have our subjective feelings of whether it did or not. If the full Board decides that they want to do this other thing, I would assume as a Director on the EC that I'll do what they direct us to do even though I may not agree with it. Steiner: Because I am a member of the EC, if I felt the General Manager's was satisfactory and I so word that and a majority of the EC ---- that then that would obviously ---- JC: No. Not the way the motion is made. Leipzig: I support the idea that the EC Directors or General Manager's response was satisfactory for my own questions. If the EC can argue before this Board ----- rationale with an outside consultant to examine our procedures, then I would be happy to vote in favor of that. I would like to hear ----- explanation and analysis. Welch: My only comment is I think the idea is a terrific one, to get an independent view point in this respect. My concern is the cost or manner or type of investigation that is to take place by the consultant and I certainly wouldn't want our EC to go out and spend $500,000 to research these particular issues. It is my concern, the open-ended nature of the motion as it reflects cost. I would want the opportunity to vote on that. If the EC wants to spend $500,000 1 would like to have the opportunity to vote against it. Ferryman: I agree with what he just said but I think that perhaps the right approach would be to have the EC limit the scope of work, or determine the scope of what the investigation is going to be, both financially and the scope of work. I do still feel that it should be a third party independent consultant. Stanton: I agree with the concerns about the cost but I think, and again this is an -14- aside, a very quick aside, after reading the General Manager's report, I find I don't know, I'd like to sit down with those who disagree and go over this line by line, but I find that basically the memo pretty much confirms all of the figures that The Register in terms of the cost overruns, the total costs paid. It's just put in a way that it doesn't seem to, but if you start adding up the figures it hits right on almost word for word in terms of the money that we actually spent. So, again, with that as an aside, that is a major motivation why I think that we have to look at reporting procedures, the information we receive, what's happened in the past, the whole process of what we're spending. Cost is an important consideration. If you hire an outside person, we've got to agree to that part of the motion, but it's going to cost us some money. How much will it cost? I don't mean to be glib or flip about this but, you know, it's not going to cost $435,000 which is what we just paid for an Issue in legal fees that didn't even go into the court room. It went into arbitration. And we didn't get that money back. Now, how much more of that do we have to go through until we stop and say wait a minute. Let's get an independent look at this. Do you want to put a limit on this of $250,000 or $300,000, something like that? You know, John Collins would probably stop any change orders that would adjust that but, again, I'm not being sarcastic. It's not going to cost $435,000. But if you start adding up what we've spent because of the allegations and charges that have been made in that Register article, you know, whatever we spend on this is going to be a drop in the bucket compared to what is being questioned at this District right now. Steiner: I would just hope, Mr. Chairman, that when it comes to the EC that it is really well thought out in terms of scope of work, exactly what type of objectives we achieve and that fact that we are talking in some cases about different persons' perceptions and approach it in a very logical way, not open-ended ----- In fact that can be as dangerous as doing or just going off on a tangent. Collins: It is my intention that if it does get to the EC, and certainly they will hear from the staff a review I suppose of pretty much what the General Manager has told us, maybe in a little bit more detail, to help them formulate a decision. If they cannot come to, and they certainly can't do everything at that one meeting, for example they couldn't go out and solicit proposals and start the interview process at that meeting, clearly. But if they came to a much different conclusion, they certainly would have the right to bring it back to this body and ask for another motion. If they find that action is required, that this motion that we now have in front of us gets that ball rolling without any further delay of having this -------. JC: Alright. What's your pleasure? Directors: Call for the question JC: Alright. Do you all remember what the question is? No? I didn't think you -15- did. Let's ask, what is the question? Collins: I would like that read back, please. Director: First one or second? - JC: Third one Collins: The one that is on the floor. The one that we're considering. I have it written out but I also have it changed. Debay: I have a question. I'm living in a different place, maybe, than a lot of you. I don't take The Register so I have not read, maybe it's better. I'm beginning to wonder if we're running this Board or if The Register is? JC: I think the unfortunate thing in this whole thing is the Orange County Register does feel that they are going to whip-saw this Board and they have some of the Directors very candidly. I think that we need to keep in focus, folks, what this organization has been over the years and not all of a sudden because of accusations, and I will strongly disagree with Director Stanton and the fact that everything has been worn out that was in the Orange County Register, I have spent several hours at this District with staff since this happened. I have looked at the documents and I think it is a great aberration in the paper vs. what really happened. So, I disagree. Director Stanton? Stanton: Mr. Chairman, you know, I think that we've got records and haven't even seen what the problems are that we discussed for two hours in executive session. And we better dam well have that kind of discussion in open session here with all 40 Directors. When we're talking about metals(?) that are joined together, we're told it's been done for 30 years that way. And there are corrosion problems out there. We don't know when these things happen. I have to question and couldn't get an answer from staff. I finally had to tell the attorney to shut up and let the engineers answer the question in the last executive board session when I was told that they knew about this three years ago and I said you are just bringing this to us now in 1994? You're bringing this problem to us now when it has fallen out of warranty? Oh, well, we think we knew about it then. I think we mentioned it to you back in 1993. 1 still haven't found where it was mentioned in 1993. So, Mr. Chairman, when I see here Directors that don't even know what the problems are or what is going on or haven't even read one account of it let alone two accounts of it, and I've seen it from both sides. I've seen it in the executive session and I've seen it in The Register, and I've read this report where The Register is talking about a job is costing over a half-million dollars and it only starts out at $114,000 or $135,000, but then you add all these things on and it's the same price that we're talking about, you know, I'm really concerned that all of us -16- are on the same planet here as far as what these charges are. And I really resent you saying that any Directors are whip-sawed by The Register. That's just bullshit! JC: ---Roger, you're entitled to your opinion. I'm entitled to mine. I'm sorry that we don't agree. Director Collins? Collins: Would the Assistant Board Secretary find it helpful if I read the motion? ABS: I certainly would. Collins: I think I've got it right now, Penny. I'll give you a copy of this after the meeting. The motion is to direct the Executive Committee to consider at its next meeting all facts and accusations contained in The Register articles and to retain an independent consultant to undertake value (?) engineering and investigate issues set forth in The Register articles. The EC be authorized to solicit proposals and I would like to add. I just want to add one more thing. The intention of the motion, as Director Steiner has mentioned, if the EC came to a conclusion that this was something that they shouldn't do, they should come back to this Board. If the body of evidence presented to them is overwhelming they should not continue, they couldn't continue anyway at the next meeting. So if that's the way they wanted to go then they can do the scope of work and get on with the project and be authorized to do so by this Board. TLW: Director Collins, could I inquire? As I thought I heard it and took notes, it seems like it was somewhat contradictory. I read your motion as being to consider at the next meeting all facts and accusations set forth in The Register articles and to retain an independent consultant. But then you later said and then to solicit _ proposals. If you've authorized and directed the committee to, did you intend to have the EC go out and retain because..... Collins: Well, the EC when after they clearly come to the conclusion of reviewing the facts and cannot go out that night and do something, I've added the solicit of 4 proposals as one of the first steps as going out and getting somebody. As I understand it, Tom, we've authorized not just to retain but to start the process going. If we don't need the statement of them authorizing solicit of proposals . . . TLW: That isn't my concern. My concern is that I thought I heard you say to direct the committee to consider the facts and then to, and to retain a consultant. Two points, one: the EC can be delegated but basically all of our contracts, as you know, come back here to the full Board for approval on whether to hire anyone rather than to the EC. So unless you specifically want to delegate the contractual authority to the EC there is an inconsistency. The other inconsistency was, as I read it, it said that to direct, for the committee to retain and then follow it up after you have retained them you are going to solicit proposals. I just that it was -17_ inconsistent. I wanted to clarify it. Collins: If it is the proper format to stop and to retain. . . TLW: Or just to consider whether the consultant should be retained. . . Collins: Here is what I'm trying to do. I'm trying to get a small body, because we can't do it here evidently this evening, a small body of the executive board which is representative of this Board to listen to all of the facts. I think the facts have to be the answer. It's not a case of whether General Manager Sylvester's report was satisfactory or unsatisfactory. The facts have to be considered and there is a definite need in my mind to have an independent party come in. Not Directors t because we, quite frankly, aren't smart to get into it, not the staff, not the attorneys, not anybody else that is attached to and associated with this Board. It has to be an independent, a pure, unbiased, unquestioned party to come in and do 1 an analysis and present that analysis back to the Directors. Now that is what I want to get done and if I have failed to express that, then if you could put that, Tom, into better language to effect that, that is what I want. (end of tape) / Partin: Where do you get the facts, John? From The Register or whoever gives the information to The Register? What facts are you talking about? The facts are the same facts that have been thrown out and blown up in a newspaper article because we are now involved in negotiations. Everything is bogged down. It makes the Districts look bad, its' Board of Directors look bad. Throw every bit of mud you can at it. The same thing is happening in my city with the police department. It is happening in a lot of municipalities. This is nothing new. I read those articles in The Register and trash them. As an engineer I've worked a lot of big projects and I know that you cannot ever in your wildest dreams hope to come in under what you budgeted for. Collins: You asked a lot of questions. The first question is where do I get the facts. I'm not sure. I'm not sure where the facts come from. I don't believe The Register has 100% facts. I'm not sure that we do as well. So what I want to do Is get some Independent party to come in here and say hey, we'll look at the accusations, we'll look at the response if they don't match up or, what I think may have happened because there are some things that I don't want to prejudge a little bit there, that the procedures are not affective procedures. I have a concern when the design engineer is the person who does the quality assurance part. And that is unfair to Tom, quite frankly, and to his department. I would rather see some procedural changes. And I believe that an independent party can come in here, that is the kind of thing we may get. And if they deal with more budgets, I don't know. I don't want to get that far down in front of us. But there are going to be some good, solid, independent recommendations made from whoever we can get. I assume we can get some independent people. _18_ Partin: That may be a problem. Collins: It may be. But let's let the EC decide that. If the EC says there is no way we can get an independent party to do this, have them come back to us and make that recommendation. We've done business with almost every design engineer on the western seaboard, I assume. And it may be difficult to get a good design engineer to come. Or maybe we can get some independent auditor to go off and hire a design engineer or contractor or procedural person or administrator or whatever, and come in and give us some recommendations. I think it's time we do that. And I have some concerns. JC: Let me say this. I agree with where I think you are going, John. I feel that certainly our procedures in the past, because of the fact that we have chosen, and I think a lot of our new directors are not aware of this but we have chosen to have a small staff deliberately and to work through the procedures that we currently have and that is to go out, hire consultants and other people to do our work for us. I agree that I think maybe we need to analyze our practices and procedures and we may find that the recommendation of someone could be maybe we ought to change and maybe we should hire 50 engineers and do our own work. That might be the recommendation. I don't know. And then we have to struggle with that. I don't think that The Register article, while I disagree with a lot that's said, I still think that it doesn't mean that we should hide our heads in the sand and say well, just because it came out of The Register or whatever that there is nothing there. I am fully satisfied from my investigation that there is not a total truthfulness but that doesn't mean to say that I don't agree with looking at what our practices and procedures are and seeing if there is a better way to do it. 20/20 hindsight is always great. We can always be critical after the fact. But, you know, we're in the trenches. They are in the trenches. We've got to understand that. I think if you're going in that direction where we're basically trying to look at our practices and procedures and see if there is a better way that we can do this, I don't think staff or anybody here will disagree with that. I think it is how are we getting there that is the problem. Collins: If I may, sir. I agree with.what you said. I think we now have in front of us the incidence through at lease assume that will give us a leading indicator of where we should start looking to examine our procedures. If we do have difficulty, and please don't get me wrong. And nobody in the audience should get me wrong. I am not saying we do. I'm saying if we do have difficulties that at least the accusations that have been raised seem to be significant enough that they should be looked at and perhaps exposed so that procedural changes or staffing changes that we should make. Just as a quick add, I would also like to challenge the EC Directors to attend the New Directors' Orientation because I think it will be helpful to understand the plant and its facilities. -19- JC: I think everybody should attend it. I think if you haven't, you're cheating yourself. Director Stanton and then Director McGuigan. Stanton: Mr. Chairman, I think as a result of this what you have concluded and satisfied yourself might be a possible outcome. And in fact everybody might then agree with you. But just for Mr. Partin's purpose, one thing if you read that article, Mr. Woodruff, it looks like there have been certain documents obtained through The Register through a freedom of information search. Is that true or not? TLW: They didn't make a freedom of information search. Stanton: They asked for documents? TLW: Sure. The Register reporter is in the room tonight for those of you who didn't know that. He's been over here at the Districts, I don't know, 6, 8 or 10 times. He's been on the phone. We've given him response, we've attached— Stanton; The answer is yes. That's all I want. A yes or no. So, you know, that little tiny _ was, why weren't we ever told that The Register reporter is over here in our files getting documents? Why weren't we told that? And second part, b, I'd like to see copies of the very documents that this District gave him so I can look at it with The Register article, I'll give you a copy of that, to see if there is match. I'd like to see those. As a matter of _, that has happened in my city, in my county. If there is an information search, we're notified and we're given the documents that were given to the press. As one Director, I will make that request. TLW: We have a log, I believe, of everything that the Register reporter requested, a copy of. He spent many hours here. He looked at, we handed over to him for his review something on the order of 100 or 150 manilla file folders, and they were of varying thicknesses, and he didn't make copies but looked and took his notes so we have no record -- Stanton: He has no copies of any documents? TLW: No, I said he requested copies and we made some copies and we have a log of everything he has a copy of and it's no problem, I'm sure, that staff and Board Secretary's office, we have, the District has a log of what was copied. Stanton: May we, as Directors, get copies of those documents copied by the reporter at the EC meeting? TLW: Of course. McGuigan: Mr. Chairman, I'm not sure of this. I'm not a member of the EC but -20- I'm not sure if I were whether I would have any idea specifically as to where you are going to go. Mr. Collins was mentioning about changing procedures and we're looking at something that did happen that maybe could have been misreported, perhaps. I'm concerned as to whether or not the EC going to have specific direction for deciding how to choreograph the proposals let alone what type of concern or_ we would be able to respond to. Hammond: Two points. First of all, it seems like we did call for the question and this was supposed to be only a definition of what the question was to be. JC: I think it's trying to clarify specifically what the words were or what the meaning of the words was, if you will. Hammond: Second point, my preference, and I don't know how John or anyone else would feel about this, but would be to direct the EC to define the scope of work, request proposals and bring those proposals back to the entire Board for final review. This would be a substitute motion. Seconded JC: Alright, we have a substitute motion. Did everyone hear that? Alright, Director Moreno. Moreno: JC: Okay, we have a substitute motion. Collins: I did not hear it, Mr. Chairman. JC: Okay, state the motion and then we'll go Hammond: I'll do my best to get it in the same way to direct the EC to define the scope of work, to request proposals and bring those proposals back to the entire board for authorization. Collins: So in other words, you are changing my motion is not referencing the accusations made by The Register so I'm not sure what proposals or what investigation you are talking about. Hammond: I think the EC may want to limit it to The Register accusations or may want to expand it somewhat depending upon other issues that might come up on their own sight between now and then and input that other Directors may pass on to the EC between now and then. -21- Welch: I think that's a real good idea. My question was going to be with regard to the original motion whether or not it included the delegation that Tom talked about to the EC of the authority to actually make and enter into a contract, not just solicit bids but to enter into a contract. I was going to object to that. I prefer the substitute motion. Sansone: I have a second substitute motion. What is going on is water over the damn. It has been answered by the General Manager. I suspect that from this point, and here's the motion, that we institute and authorize an audit of our operational and technical procedures. Seconded Director I?j: No it isn't. I think the point he is trying to get through here is to forget about the articles in The Register. Hire the proper consultant to come in and review our procedures. All he has to do is take into account the articles in the paper and the response by the General Manager and make his determination. Ferryman: I agree. I think Director Sansone has gotten to the heart of the thing. That's where we need to be and I think that's where everyone's concerns are. Are we following the proper procedures and as John mentioned earlier, as far as ------ already authorized, so I agree with the substitute motion on the floor. JC: Alright, the substitute substitute motion. Further discussion? Alright, we're going to go for the substitute substitute motion. We all know what that is. Phil, state it again. Sansone: That we authorize the EC to employ an independent investigator/consultant to perform an audit on operational and technical procedures. JC: Alright and that's seconded. Under discussion let's go to Debay and then Barrera. Debay: I'm curious by what consists of an audit. What from the staff? What are you talking about? Are we going to look at every procedure book here? What do you mean by audit? Sansone: An operational audit, it is pretty well standard. We did this at the waste management commission and they tore us apart. An independent audit. They recommended changes on all different types of procedures and it was up to the commission and the board to agree to it, which they did and that is what I'm looking for here. Someone to come in independently and look at how and the way we are doing business and say is this the best way it can be done. Can it be done -22- better in a different way? Debay: How long did it take and how much did it cost? Sansone: I don't remember, Pat McGuigan, do you remember how much? McGuigan: I've been wracking my brains trying to think. I think it was at least half a million dollars. Barrera: Mr. Chairman, have we ever done and had any kind of an audit in the past in our history as to procedures. Was there one done ---? JWS: Not the type you are specifically talking about. The independent financial auditor checks our internal controls and, in fact, the Board just passed an action tonight to hire them to do an extension of that. But the type that you are talking about, no. Barrera: Could that be added to that particular same audit? JC: I don't know that they are the ones that should do it, Fred. Stanton: I would speak strongly against the substitute motion. It is a subset of the Hammond-Collins motion. It is a smaller portion of it. You might very well end up with looking at procedures that in fact have -- to have failed and adjust those procedures. The other thing I object to, with all due respect sir with regard to your motion, is you are saying that's water under the bridge. The whole issue is water that has been under the bridge that maybe we haven't seen go by and we want to go back and see what was happening over the last three years. I am totally against saying we'll just close the door on the time period from now past and we look at everything from this point on in the future, the whole point of what's being discussed now, when you look at these incidents, when you read the Directors' report, we're talking about past issues in terms of when we were told things, when we weren't told things, whether we are in warranty and what happened. The whole issue we just went through in the arbitration was passed. You can't say that you are going to cut off and forget this. You've got to look at this. The whole purpose, I think with John Collins' original motion and Barry's amendment thereof. JC: Alright, thank you. Director Gullixson, Director Collins and then Director Sansone: Sansone: I'd like to withdraw my motion. JC: Alright, the motion has been withdrawn. -23- Gullixson: I'm in support of the substitute motion because I think it approaches the EC and it allows them the flexibility with a broad brush to narrow the issue itself and bring it back to the Board ------- I think the EC needs the flexibility right off the bat and let them have the broad brush approach to bring the issue back. JC: Alright. One last vote. We did have a hand and then we'll go to the vote. Director Collins? Collins: My concern is to combine both efforts here. And I understand my concern when I made the motion to begin with was not just to come up with better procedures, which I think would be the offshoot of doing this, but whether we like it or not, we have accusations that have been made against us or our position. They have to be responded to. We represent millions of people in this county who have a right to know what our response is to those accusations. And the accusations' response can best come, from a credibility state anyway, from an independent person. If you rate all of these things down and each accusation, and even if we give our response to the Register and say that's not true, they said this, so forth, I would rather have it come from an independent party that says here is the accusation and here are the facts. The accusation is wrong or the accusation has some merit and here is something that can come from a procedural change to preclude it from happening in the future. JC: John, let me ask you a question. I'm going to abstain, by the way, on all of these motions because I don't think they are an emergency, but let me just say this. Do you think that you could listen to the responses that would be given by the staff to these particular accusations and determine whether they are right or wrong? Collins: Could I listen to them? Absolutely. JC: Do you think you could understand if somebody, if you were to read a letter that basically said something totally different than the article in the newspaper, do you think you could read and understand that? Collins: I would have a tough time understanding some of these issues. JC: I think, to be honest with you, I've gone through this with the staff. I think any of us could understand them. I do. I think any of us could understand those issues. Alright, that simple. I don't have a lot of expertise myself, as you know, but nonetheless I tell you I've sat down, I've looked at the documents, I've talked with staff, I've asked the questions and I think that you could understand where everything truly is. And I would say that to any Director in this room. So, you know, I don't know right now, very honestly, that we need to hire somebody to do an investigation of every allegation in The Register. I do feel that there are maybe -24- some things that we ultimately may want to change. Not because it is wrong, but it might be better. But I think I'd give yourself a chance first to listen to what the staff has to say and to find out if, in fact, there's really any merit to all of this stuff. And if you feel after that that there is, move on with it. Or if you feel that it is too technical and you can't understand it, move on with it. Collins: Mr. Chairman, you have said so often we can have a difference of opinion and I believe we have one now. Because I don't believe, I don't have an engineering background and some of the other backgrounds that would be required to fully understand and comprehend all of the answers. JC: I don't think it takes that. Collins: Well, I do because of some of the things --- the engines for the last year or so and some of the other technical issues. If staff came up and said it was blue, I would have to be totally at the mercy of staff saying trust me, I've looked into and it's not the case. JC: This stuff wasn't just listening to staff. This was reading documents. Debay: I was going to ask if it would be better to schedule an additional meeting to do just exactly what you suggested. For two years I have been sitting here taking the advice of the EC not knowing the facts so maybe it's time you involved all the Directors and do exactly what you just suggested. Stanton: Mr. Chairman, with regard to a very special comment of discussion between you and Mr. Collins, I don't think the issue Is who is smart and who isn't smart. I think the issue is independence, as called by his motion. JC: Alright, we have a motion and a second on the floor. We're going to go with it. Repeat the motion, the second motion. This is the substitute motion. Hammond: Penny, do you have it written down? ABS: The motion is to direct the EC to define the scope of work, request proposals, and bring the proposals back to the Board for final review. JC: Alright, we have a motion and a second for that. Hammond: regarding the allegations that have recently been made ABS: Excuse me and to allow the EC to limit it to The Register article or expand it, if possible, with other input from other Directors -25- TLW: Scope of work to include The Register article Hammond: Right, but not limited to Stanton: to include but not limit to JC: We have a motion and a second. I will abstain. The motion carries. We will now go into closed session. #113 JWS: Mr. Dawes, the question was if there's a problem if the contract under Item 13 was continued for 60 days TMD: Thg bids allow a 60 days from the opening. I believe the opening was February 1st so a 60ddays continuation, a 30 day might get us.... I'm sure the contractor, if we ask him would give us more time also. ?: ------ direct that the contractor give us more time and otherwise ---- a 30 day. JC: Well, ok. Barrera: In comments, when the contractors------- JC: Go ahead, Fred. Barrera: I said would this ------- with this contractor the one that we just did the --- and everything was fine. TLW: We have used this contractor here on a number of our jobs and the jobs from a construction point of view have always come in on time and within budget and the quality of their work has been excellent. In terms of accidents, we have no reported accidents from this contractor either. JC: Further discussion? JC: Alright, in discussing with General Counsel. Maybe two things we need; first off is if you want to cancel or undo the prior action we need a motion and a second to do that. $gcondarily, we need clarification of what it is specifically we are going to do just wait 60 days or what? ?: I think parliamentary rules are that wet Onsider the motion that automatically --- --- the previous motion. nyj Lu.�• -26- TLW: Well, that is I like when you have something like this I like the record to be as thorough and complete as possible and so the effect is of reconsideration does that. I just want everyone is aware of what it would be doing if that is what your intent and decision is that you effectively cancel the prior action earlier and reinstate the item on the agenda. Ferryman: Are we trying to achieve something within the 60 day period? Is there going to be a closure on this other issue within the 60 days period that is going to determine whether we are going to go forward with this contract? JC: I don't know how to answer that. TLW: I don't know how to answer that either. As the Chairman, I am not sure what direction I am given or anybody else is given as to what we can come back with. ?: The reason I said 60 days is pulling off of thin air. I thought this was an on-going investigation and information is evolving would be provided the Districts in this tragedy and maybe in another month or two we would have a better comfort level as whether Pascal & Ludwig would ----- called for or not. We may not have an answer and I guess we have to deal with it at that time. ------- a little bit more time. I mean rather than approve a million dollar contract tonight for something that is ...... JC: There is an alternate to that too but ... Director Hammond? Hammond: I was just going to clarify what I thought John's motion was. I thought his notion was sim I to rescind ntinue with a minimum o days and discuss with the contractor the option of ------ a total of 60 days to give us the opportunity to see what future information might come to light regarding ----- of the contractor and the accident before we actually let him contrac again an a motion was seconded. Fred jumped in but I did second it. JC: Ok, in discussion, Tom what would the problem be if we just didn't approve this at all but rejected all bids? Where are we going to stand if we don't go forward with this project? Because if we are looking at 60 days from the date the bids were opened we have to be done before our next meeting. There has to be a decision because by that time the 60 days will have run. TMD: There should be no reason why you couldn't reject these bids There is nothing urgent on this job. It is a repair type job, fixing things up, issues like that. It is not standing on a critical path with respect to any other work so the bids could be rejected. -27_ JC: Well, the thing is that the bids are good for 60 days from the date they are opened. If they would extend it, that would be fine. But, it is either that. If we don't, then we could reject them. The thing is the 60 days will not occur until til after, it will occur before our next Boar meet ng. There were opened February 1st, I e ieve was the comment. March, April. They were opened on February 1st. It will be April. �1•` Gullixson: I withdraw my previous motion. I move that we reject all bids. JC: Alright, we have a withdrawn. Do we have a second to the motion? Alright. ?: Does this action tonight might discredit us our Sanitation Districts with respect to cases that might come up with regards to the accident. ----- the next bid, with rejecting him cause some suspicion that he was not a good contractor when very well satisfied with his work all of these years. Now we come in and say well, we reject him because we don't really trust him now. Why did we have him on board in the first place if we know feel that way? I don't think this is a good action if we are trying to ----- rejecting this bid or even rejecting them all because it is going to get out what we have done. The guy has the next job coming and we decide he may not be as good as we thought he was so we might suffer some liability from that viewpoint. In my opinion, I don't think it is a good thing. Debay: I was just trying to listen to the reverse side of the coin as it turns out that we are responsible and now no contractor will work for us. I don't know what we are trying to accomplish by this. JC: Director Collins, Stanton and Barrera. Collins: As I undererand it the basis for refusing the acceptance of the bids is getting them all back The fact that they had this company has an OSHA sit against them. TLW: I would strongly urge and recommend that you do not make such a finding because al we do not have the OSHA findings bl that is not basis upon which you would want to reject it. We have in the notice of inviting bids the absolute discretion o reject all bids without cause if you want to make it. If you want to reject them that would be to way to do it because otherwise you would_make a prejudicial finding for which we really have facts to support it. Collins: That is my point because this is certainly not a criteria of selecting people so turning them all back for basically no reason kind of concerns me. Directors: Me too. -28- Stanton: Mr. Chairman, sir, may I get clarification on what I thought Mr. Dawes said and if I am wrong I will admit error in hearing. I thought Mr. Dawes said we could go 30 days and during that time discuss with the contractor if he would be willing to agree to a further delay? TMD: I said that; I am thinking now; I may be a few days off because the Board meeting is (Tape ended) Stanton: Thank you, sir, I did hear and ....... JC: Director Barrera and then Director Gullixson. Barrens: There were two people killed and probably until we find out what happened I think we should hold this thing up. This may be a great contractor but something went wrong that is very serious. Gullixson: The reason for bringing the motion to ----- I had a little concern with whether the subcontractor or we willing to take the steps necessary to insure a safe place to work and are we having appropriate safety meetin s and safer supervisor m in erently dangerous situations involved. I think in 30 days we can s ose ques ions, ave sta come back so we can feel that things are being looked at from that safety perspective because essentially what Mr. Spradlin said was that we are exposed to liability in these situations when reasonable call for certain safety measures and we have to take them. The question is whether or we protected ourselves b utting in writing, factual) I hint; is some er oth exoosure but since this is not a contract t at is required to be done right now and since we don't have to ----, I think we should review the questions about safety, 30 and 60 days to ask reasonable questions before we award the contract. Leipzig: Has any of the work to be done by this contractor ----------- working in close spaces? TMD: Not certain right now. Almost all of our contracts we have to go into confined spaces. JC: I believe that, correct me if I am wrong, that Dan said that they had been working in that ditch 3 or 4 times and at one time they did have monitoring equipment in there and decided they didn't need it anymore and this time they didn't have it. I believe that is what he said. Saltarelli: I agree with Director Gullixson. I think his last comment hit it right on the head. It is not that we are taking any action on any particular contractor at this time. Because this job was a very serious accident as Mr. Barrera said , I think 30 days to review our procedures and things like that certainly make alot of sense. -29- think the motion should be based on as Director Gullixson just said. JC: So the concern then so I can understand it is not so much as going forward wi contractor but it is concern that do we have a sa e environment? Gullixson: Safe work environment and have we documented the safety requirements necessary to eliminate our liability if someone is hurt on the workplace who is employed by the subcontractor. JC: Director Partin and then McGuigan. Partin: I think this is a very dangerous time in possible future litigation coming up about this to be doing anything with respect to investigation our in-house safety precautions and procedures. It may need to be done but I don't think that this very moment we should be broaching that subject. �y McGuigan: The motion as I understand it is to reject all bids? JC: That Is the motion. JC: Let me just say another point was just raised by General Counsel and that is that if time 30, 60 or whatever days would make a difference what could happen now is Tom could talk to them and see if they would be willing to continue this matter for a period of months at their agreement and if in fact... excuse me. Stanton: I'm sorry, sir. JC: Excuse me, I am sure what you have to say is more important than what I have to say. Stanton: That is what Dawes said before. JC: But again it has been pointed out that if in fact the contractor does not wish to continue this matter to a time that we feel would be reasonable that is going to lapsed any way after 60 days. We could do that and if in fact that happens then there is nothing that we have accepted. We have to go back out for bids again so we can do it either way but again I bring it up only because it just suggested to me. I think either way it goes, it would work. The motion on the floor currently is to reject all bids. -- TLW: If I could add one point that I know has been raised by Directors before. By rejecting all bids means that we would have to go back and republish and incur those costs. Second thing is this bid came in $300,000 below estimate so it is a -30- very attractive bid for the benefit of the Districts. I was suggesting that if you want the time and I think that makes good sense to take the 30 or 60 days to get t e investigation. If you smp y on ac on if ah�f Pascal & Ludwig oesn t agree to extending the award by 60 days then he lost the bid anyway and we won't have the bid ro anvbodv We will be back and we will go out for new bids. If he does agree to it and within 60 days the Boars etermme we will or we won't award it to them you preserve the ootion of at least of preserving a good bid as well as having your investigation. Debay: May I ask the engineers or technical people here if they are concerned about this company? TMD: This company has had a 5 or 6 jobs with us over the last several years; mostly smaller jobs under $1 million and I have never heard from our people that they are unsafe, notwithstanding the terrible accident that took place but I haven't heard any reports of that. Gullixson: It is not a question of whether they are unsafe, it is a question of /� whether we are unsafe to the point that we pose ourselves liability. I withdraw my motion and move that we continue if you think we can get awav with that ---------- (very loud cough that wiped it out) and award it within 60 days anyway. JC: Alright, we have a new motion. Any discussion? We have a second. Any discussion? Any opposition to the motion? Alright, thank you. -31- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 2, 39 59 69, 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON MARCH 9, 1994 ITATIO Is O9q GE COVN• ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on March 9, 1994. at 7:30 p.m., In the District&' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the foil was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO.1: Fred Be... Chairman Gen.Beyer Pat McGuigan,Chairman pro tam Thomas E. Lutz r James M.Ferryman Nate Reade Thomas R. SalNmlli Leslie Pontious _L Roger Stanton William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: x Jahn Collins, Chairman George Scott Iry Pickier, Chairman pro tam Tom Daly s_ Fred Barren Gene Beyer • Buck Catlin Chris Norby • Be"Danes Bob Bell Norman Z.Eckemode Michael Maenzweiler Wiliam D.Mahoney James H.Flora i Carrey J. Nelson _ Glenn Parker Miguel Pulldo Thomas E.Lutz Roger Stanton William G.Stainer Denlel T.Welch John M. Gullisson George L.Maknt Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO. 3: a Sal A. Studied, Chairman Wiliam C.Estrada _ Surnle Dunlap. Chairman pro tam Carrey J.Nelson George Brown Gwen A.Forsythe 1� Buck Catlin Chris Thin, John Collins George Scott James H.Flora William D. Mahoney Don R.Griffin Donald Bane Wally U. Eva G. Miner Thomas E.Lute Pat McGuigan Onde Moulton-Patterson Earle Rabitallle Richard Panin _ Joyce C.Nicholson by Pickier Tam Daly Margie L. Rice James V.Evans Sheldon Singer �_ George L.Zlaket y_ Roger Stanton _ William G. Steiner Chades Sylvia Anthony Selvaggi DISTRICT NO.5: _ John C.Co.,Jr.,Chairman Jan Debey Phil Sansone,Chairman pro tam Jan Deasy Wiliam G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.B: James A.Wavier. Chairman Arthur Perry • Evelyn Hart,Chairman pro tam John C.Co.,Jr. • William G.Stainer Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: Berry Hammond,Chairman Mike Ward James A.Waller, Chairman pro tam Mike Schaefer Fred Bader Gem Beyer Jan Deb" Phil Sansone Ted Moreno Miguel Pulido Charles E.Puckett _ Thomas R. S.1m.111 y_ Wiliam G.Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: �_ Grace Wnchell, Chairman Earle Rabitellle Victor Leipzig.Chairman pro tam Linde MoultonYartarson x Roger Stanton Wiliam G. Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: John M.Gullizson, Chairman Daniel T.Welch a Fred Danes.Chairman pro hem Gem Beyer Glenn Parker Bumle Dunlap Iry Fickler Tam Daly j William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.14: Peer A.Swan,Chairman Grand Miller y_ Lealle PontioUS, Charman pro tam Chad"E. Puckett x Fred Be.. Ga.Sayer x _ Bony Hammond Mika Ward a William G. Sigma, Roger Stanton -2- 03/09/94 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Carl E. Beach, Pat Brady, Peter Brown, ,a Mike Broyles, Frank Chavez, Corinne Clawson, t,l Don Crapnell, James Elo, Dave Erdkamp, John Finias, Chuck Frey, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Steve Hovey, Tod Jacobson, Larry Lazorek, Mark Legg, John Linder, Robert Morris, Karl Nordgren, Bob Dolan, Joseph Park, William Pierce, L. Ellen Ray, Lynn Redman, Phil Serrantino, Mary Simpson, Manny Stoffer, Jim Tintle, Jack Vincent, Mike Wilson, Chuck Winsor, Jeff Woodward, Ray Young OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Jim Evans, Bill Fleming, David L. Hamilton, Chris Knap, Bill Knopf, Tom Nixon, Jim Silva, Dan Spradlin, Phil Stone DISTRICT 3 In the absence of Chairman Sal Sapien and Appointment of Chairman pro tam Chairman pro tam Burnie Dunlap, Director Wally Linn was appointed Chairman pro tam of District No. 3. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized L. Ellen Ray, an Recognition of persons who wish to be employee on the bargaining committee for the heard on matters of general interest Operations and Maintenance Employees, who addressed the Boards in regard to a packet that was distributed to Directors that evening by the committee. The Joint Chairman also recognized David Hamilton, business agent for the IUOE Local 501 Operating Engineers, who also addressed the Boards in regard to the current meet and confer process pertaining to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the Operations and Maintenance Employee Unit, urging the Boards to consider the Union's proposal (passed out earlier) on meet and confer matters. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman Presentation of resolutions of presented plaques and resolutions of appreciation and plaques to retiring appreciation to retiring active directors Directors James Evans, who represented the Midway City Sanitary District on the Board of District No. 3, and Jim Silva who represented the City of Huntington Beach on the Board of District No. 3. r -3- 03/09/94 The Joint Chairman reported that retiring active directors Bob Bell, former representative from Villa Park; Gail Kerry, former representative from Cypress; Eva Miner, former representative from La Palma; Maria Moreno, former representative from Placentia; Robert Richardson, former representative from Santa Ana; and Hank Wedaa, former representative from Yorba Linda, were unable to attend the meeting that evening. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the tentatively Reoort of the Joint Chairman scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: 9 Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, March 16th, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, March 23rd, at 5:30 p.m. (Directors Jan Debay and Barry Denes were also invited to attend.) Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers - Wednesday, March 30th, at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that the New Report of the General Manager Directors' Orientation and Treatment Plant Tour was scheduled for Saturday, March 19th from 9:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. For those Directors who had not responded with regard to their attendance to the orientation and tour, the General Manager requested that they complete the form that was placed in their folders that evening. ' DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 03/09/94 DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments to - Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments to ICI Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Or DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments to Approval of Minutes the minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1994, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "S" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 02/09/94 02/23/94 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $538,036.05 $803,402.14 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 385,751.73 1,848,590.58 Joint Working Capital Fund - 151,387.48 152,171.14 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 12,700.91 26,613.41 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 8,237.84 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 24,875.26 2,732.08 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 46,562.38 16,759.21 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 329,467.16 714.54 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 4,854.24 21,475.30 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 44,654.43 42,360.06 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 12,416.24 8,082.35 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 102.84 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 2,829.82 540.04 DISTRICT NOS. 1 & 7 JOINT - 0.00 320.10 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT 10,988.15 578,741.94 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 16.10 2,103.18 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 0.00 298.18 51.572.880.63 53.504.904.25 ' -5- 03/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of One Self-Propelled Aerial Work Platform. That the bid tabulation and recommendation re Specification No. E-241 award of Purchase of One Self-Propelled Aerial Work Platform, Specification No. E-241, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to American Hi-Lift for a total amount not to exceed $74,785.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approvina Amendment No. 1 to the contract for Purchase of Hydrogen That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Peroxide. Specification No, P-140, Resolution No. 94-32, approving Amendment assigning contract from Peroxidation No. 1 to the contract for Purchase of Hydrogen Systems. Inc. to Vulcan Peroxidation Peroxide, Specification No. P-140, assigning said Systems Inc. contract from Peroxidation Systems, Inc. to Vulcan Peroxidation Systems Inc., with no change in the terms and provisions of the original contract dated October 1, 1993. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue_a purchase order to PacTel Meridian Systems for That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Amendment No. 2 to the Telephone a purchase order to PacTel Meridian Systems for System Maintenance Agreement for Amendment No. 2 to the Telephone System the Districts' telephone PBX and related Maintenance Agreement for the Districts' equipment (Specification No. 5-060) telephone PBX and related equipment (Specification No. 5-060), to extend said agreement for a six-month period from February 22, 1994 through August 21, 1994, for an amount not to exceed $15,468.00 for existing equipment. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Purchase of Four Intermediate Size Four-Door Sedans. Specification No. V-003 The Directors entered into a lengthy discussion questioning the justification for purchasing two of the four vehicles proposed for procurement. The two vehicles requested by the Engineering Department (planning/design and construction management) were additional vehicles, not replacement, and the Director of Engineering commented on their proposed use. In response to a question concerning use of Districts' vehicles versus reimbursing an employee for use of their personal vehicle, staff and counsel explained that use of Districts' owned vehicles was preferred because of insurance issues. • Directors also asked about the policy for assigning vehicles to individuals to drive home and requested that staff prepare a report. Following the discussion, the following action was taken: -6- 03/09/94 Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Swift Dodge for the Purchase of Two Intermediate Size Four-Door Sedans, Specification No. V-003 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Swift Dodge for the Purchase of Two Intermediate Size Four-Door Sedans, Specification No. V-003, for a total amount not to exceed $21,938.00 plus sales tax, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Cooperative Procurement Program of the State of California, and State of California Contract No. 1-94-23-10, said vehicles to be used to replace existing vehicles in the motor pool and the Operations division. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chanae Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2), authorizing a net addition of $36,228.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. for three items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 10 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and No. P2.42-2 specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, authorizing a net deduction of $24,407.00 from the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for four items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 12 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approvina Change Order No. 1 to the Plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and No. P2-43-1 specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, authorizing a net deduction of $48,807.00 from the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for 16 items of added or deleted work, be, and is hereby, approved. -7- 03/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Electrification of Pumo Drives • at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1 Approving Chanae Order No. 7 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-42-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 7 to the plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, authorizing a net addition of $1,032.00 to the contract with Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper Construction Co., Inc. for three items of additional work, granting a time extension of 503 calendar days for completion of said additional work, and assessment of liquidated damages at $2,000 per day for 26 days, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Job No. P2-42-1 as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-33, accepting Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-1, as complete, authorizing execution of the Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Summons and Complaint. Roadway Construction Co.. That the Summons and Complaint, Roadway Inc. vs. Javaid Contractors Inc. and Construction Co., Inc.vs. Javaid Contractors, County Sanitation Districts of Orange Inc. and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. Harbor Judicial District Case County, Harbor Judicial District Case No. 94C0873 No. 94C0873, relative to a stop notice filed by a subcontractor against Districts' contractor, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed: and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. -8- 03/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and aoorove staff Summary Financial Report for That the staff Summary Financial Report for the the six-month Period ending six-month period ending December 31, 1993, December 31 , 1993 be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive. file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee and That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy Executive Committee Committee and Executive Committee meetings held on February 16, 1994 and February 23, 1994, respectively, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizina staff to negotiate a one-year extension of contract with KPMG Peat That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to Marwick for annual services for the negotiate a one-year extension of contract with 1993-94 fiscal year KPMG Peat Marwick for annual audit services for the 1993-94 fiscal year. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizina staff to solicit proposals for a multi-year engagement beginning with That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to solicit 1994-95 for fiscal year auditing from the proposals for a multi-year engagement beginning "Big Six" accountina firms and any other with 1994-95 for fiscal year auditing from the qualified accounting firm "Big Six" accounting firms and any other qualified accounting firm that has submitted a request to be included, for consideration by the Fiscal Policy Committee. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -9- 03/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-48: Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2). Job No. P2-47-2: Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-56: and Seismic Retrofit Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that in December 1993, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2. This project includes several jobs designed by both consultants and staff, combined to reduce administrative costs as well as attract lower combined bids through economies of scale. Mr. Dawes stated that on February 1, 1994, four bids were received for this project. The bids ranged from a high of $1,774,430.00 to a low of $1,003,899.00, submitted by Pascal & Ludwig Engineers and recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. The engineer's estimate was $1,350,000.00. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job Nos. P1-48. P2-47-2. P2-56 and P2-53.2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, changing the date for receipt of bids from January 11, 1994 to February 1, 1994, be, and is hereby, approved. -10- 03/09/94 Approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Job Nos. P1-48. P2-47-2. P2-56 and P2-53-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work (re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Awarding Job Nos. P11-48. P2-47-2. P2-56 and P2-53-2 to Pascal & Ludwio Engineers Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 94-34, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work (re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. 122-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. 122-53-2, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount of $1,003,899.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Continuino consideration of action adopting Resolution No. 94-34 awarding Job Nos. P11-48, P2-47-2. P2-56 and 122-53-2 to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers Upon return from closed session where the Boards received a report from the General Counsel pertaining to potential litigation against the Districts as owners for work being performed by Pascal & Ludwig Engineers on Miscellaneous Improvements and Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, during which two of the contractor's employees were killed in an industrial accident, the Directors entered into a lengthy discussion concerning the propriety of awarding the contract for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-48; Miscellaneous Work (re Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, because of questions about the accident on Job No. P2-49. e -11- 03/09/94 It was then moved and seconded: • That the Boards of Directors reconsider the previous action adopting Resolution No. 94-34, awarding contract for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-48; Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 21, Job No. P2-47-2, Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers in the total amount of $1,003,899.00. The project was bid on February 1, 1994 and, according to the plans and specifications, the Districts have 60 days to award the contract (April 2, 1994). The Boards discussed whether to seek an extension of the 60-day award period from the contractor to allow a review of the circumstances pertaining to the accident or whether to reject all bids and rebid the job. Following further discussion the motion was withdrawn and a new motion was made and seconded: That all bids received for Miscellaneous Architectural and Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7.48; Miscellaneous Work Ire Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2), Job No. P2-47-2; Flare Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-56; and Seismic Retrofit of Structures at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-2, be rejected. In the context of overall considerations, Directors pointed out that extending the award period would allow a review of the Districts' and contractors' safe work environment issues together with safety policies and procedures. Following further discussion the motion to reject all bids was withdrawn. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the prior action to adopt Resolution No. 94-34 be set aside; and that action to adopt Resolution No. 94-34 awarding a contract for the listed jobs be continued for 60 days; and that staff be directed to confer with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, the low bidder for said project, to obtain their consent to a delay in the award beyond that prescribed in the contract documents to allow the Districts to review safety procedures, policies, practices and records for construction on Districts' property. It was noted that if this consent was not granted by the low bidder, then all bids would expire and the project would have to be rescheduled for re-bidding. -12- 03/09/94 ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors the Convene in closed session pursuant to need for a closed session as authorized by Government Code Section 54957.6 and Government Code Section 54957.6 and 54956.9 54956.9 to review: 1) The respective positions of the Districts' and the Districts' employee groups with the Districts' designated representatives regarding the salaries, benefits and terms of employment of the Districts' employees and to provide instructions to said representatives. 2) The potential litigation arising out of a construction accident on the Districts' plant site. Director Stanton requested clarification prior to convening in closed session that the Directors would not engage in any discussion of recent newspaper reports (concerning problems on four Districts' construction projects). He expressed his opinion that any such discussions should be done in public session. The Joint Chairman agreed. He stated, however, that two of the reports (namely, the status of pending litigation involving Cooper Industries, Brinderson Corporation and the Districts relating to breach of contract for purchase and installation of central generation engine-generator sets, and the status of potential litigation against contractors who installed facilities for the Odor Control Project) would probably need to be discussed in closed session as they involve possible litigation. Oirectina Executive Committee to define scope of work for a review of the Districts' construction proiects referred to in recent press accounts, with authority to direct or expand the scope, and to request proposals for said review for consideration by the Boards It was then moved and seconded that the Boards direct the Executive Committee to consider at its next meeting, whether to retain an independent consultant to undertake value engineering and investigate the issues set out in The Register article; and, if the Executive Committee approves the hiring of a consultant, that the Executive Committee be authorized to solicit proposals. During discussion that followed it was clarified that the consultant would be reporting to the Directors and not to the staff or legal counsel. Also discussed was whether it was within the Executive Committee's discretion, after considering the issues, to proceed with the review and, if so, to solicit consulting proposals for the Boards' consideration in order that it may be accomplished as quickly as possible. The maker of the motion, with the concurrence of the seconder, then clarified that , the intent of the motion included authorization for the Executive Committee to get the ball rolling and to interview people to start the process. -13- 03/09/94 A brief discussion followed pertaining to a suggestion to further define exactly what was proposed to be studied because of potential costs, and whether the review should be by a third party or could be done in-house. After further discussion among the Directors, Districts' General Counsel advised that since the matter is moving in a different direction than just setting it on the agenda for the next Executive Committee meeting, and is being discussed with the probability of taking action on something, the Directors needed to have a 2/3 vote to add this item to the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2 as an emergency item that arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda or if it is deemed to be an emergency item. It was then moved and seconded to add this item to the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2. During the discussion that followed, General Counsel was asked for an opinion as to whether this could be considered an emergency item. Mr. Woodruff stated that an item can be added on to the agenda if the item arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda 72 hours prior to the meeting. If the Boards make the finding that it is, in fact necessary to act upon the item, then it can be added. It does, however, require a 2/3 vote. The Joint Chairman then asked if there was any opposition to the motion of adding this item to the agenda. Directors Grace Winchell, George Brown, Richard Partin, Carrey Nelson, Daniel T. Welch, Charles E. Puckett and William D. Mahoney opposed. Chairman Mahoney declared that the motion carried adding the item on to the agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54952.2. Directors then requested clarification as to whether the Executive Committee could forego an outside review if a majority of the Executive Committee would feel that the written response by the General Manager satisfactorily answers the questions that have been raised. The Joint Chairman stated that the Executive Committee would do whatever the Boards direct them to do but the option of not proceeding with the outside review was not part of the current motion. It was also suggested that the Executive Committee should have to argue a rationale for proceeding before the Boards before going forward with a review. -14- 03/09/94 Following further discussion some of the Directors expressed concern over the cost of an outside consultant. Directors expressed concern that the scope of work and objectives be well thought out and that the cost not be open-ended. There was a request for further clarification of the motion as to whether or not the Executive Committee could have authority to merely solicit proposals or to, in fact, engage a consultant. There was also some discussion about the accuracy of The Register articles, and other current events influencing the issue. Also discussed was the probable benefits of a third party review to sort out the issues and develop any recommended improvements in policies and procedures or changes in current policy of utilizing consultants versus increased staffing. Staff was also asked to provide copies of documents requested by The Register to the Executive Committee. A substitute motion was then made and seconded to direct the Executive Committee to define the scope of work, request proposals and bring the proposals back to the entire Board of Directors for final review. Following further discussion concerning clarification of the substitute motion and whether it was necessary to investigate The Register's allegations, a second substitute motion was made and seconded that the Executive Committee employ an independent investigator/consultant to perform an audit on operational and technical procedures. After discussion of the second substitute motion, it was withdrawn by the maker. Following further discussion the substitute motion was restated as follows: To direct the Executive Committee to define the scope of work, request proposals and bring the proposals back to the Boards for final review and decision, and to allow the Executive Committee to include but not limit it to The Register article, or expand it to possibly include input from other Directors. The motion carried with Joint Chairman Mahoney and Vice Joint Chairman Puckett abstaining. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: The Boards convened in closed session at 9:02 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Sections 54957.6 and 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 9:41 p.m. the Boards reconvened in regular Reconvene in regular session session. I I -15- 03/09/94 DISTRICT 1 Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint for Property Damage. La Vets Monterey Condominium Association. a California non-orofit. mutual benefit corporation: and Robert Seaesta. an individual vs. Mladen Buntich Construction Company. Inc. and County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County. Orange County Superior Court. Case No. 726220 Authorizing consideration of Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Summons and Complaint for Property Damage, La Veto Monterey Condominium Association. a California non-profit, mutual benefit corporation: and Robert Seaesta. an individual vs. Mladen Buntich Construction Company. Inc. and County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County. Oranae County Superior Court. Case No. 726220 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors does hereby authorize consideration of a supplemental agenda item relative to Summons and Complaint for Property Damage, La Vote Monterey Condominium Association, a California non-profit, mutual benefit corporation: and Robert Segesta, an individual vs. Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. and County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court, Case No. 726220, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. -16- 03/09/94 Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Property Damage, La Vote Monterey Condominium Association. a California non-profit. mutual benefit corporation: and Robert Segesta, an individual vs. Mladen Buntich Construction Company. Inc. and r County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County. Orange County Superior Court. Case No. 726220 The General Counsel stated that the Summons and Complaint was in reference to property damaged in connection with construction of the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, a joint project between Districts 1 and 2 and the cities of Orange and Santa Ana. During the course of excavation and during rainstorms, a water main broke resulting in some property damage. He further reported that the District has a construction agreement with the contractor, Mladen Buntich Construction Company. The contract has indemnity provisions and the District is entitled to and will require the contractor to secure counsel and represent the interests of the District. The project was completed in July 1993. Following a brief discussion regarding the nature of the damages, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Summons and Complaint for Property Damage, La Vets Monterey Condominium Association, a California non-profit, mutual benefit corporation; and Robert Segesta, an individual vs. Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. and County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 726220, relative to property damage sustained during the construction of the Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the District. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. -1 7- 03/09/94 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: a Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoorovino Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering That the Selection Committee certification of the Corporation for preparation of plans and final negotiated fee relative to the Professional specifications for Contract No. 6-13 Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of plans and specifications relative to Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer, Contract No. 6-13, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved: and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 94-35-6, approving said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $57,585.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. L 18 03/09/94 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. a DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:59 p.m. /O—zu�A&d Assistant Secr y f Boards of Directors of County Sa it ion s icts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 14 -19- FUND NO 9199 - Jfi DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/94 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/09/94 POSTING DATE 02/09/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 135506 AG TECH COMPANY $50,382.14 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10.9-91 135547 AMERICAN TELEPHONE&TELEGRAPH $989.19 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 135548 ABLE INDUSTRIES $954.20 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS SUPPLIES 135549 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP. $9,298.00 ENGINE TESTING J-19 135550 AIR PRODUCTS&CHEMICALS $53.364.00 O&M AGREEMENT OXY GEN.SYST.M.0.8-9-89 135551 ALPHAGAZ $1,482.38 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135552 STN-CLOUMBUS $12.99 SUBSCRIPTION 135553 BLAKE P.ANDERSON $27083 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 135554 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $275.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135555 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $7.129.82 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135556 ASSOC.ADMINIS.&CONSULTANTS $500.00 DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS 135557 AMSA $12.803.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES M.0.1-12-94 135558 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $1.613.62 PAYROLL SERVICES 135559 AWARDS B TROPHIES $24.46 PLAQUES 135560 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $9,853.31 LAB SUPPLIES 135561 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES,INC. $430.05 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 135562 BELL SECURITY $671.00 SECURITY SERVICES 135563 WT BILLARD $35.62 BUILDING REPAIRS M 135564 SIOSAFETY SYSTEMS,INC. $57.38 LAB SUPPLIES Z 135%6 BID VENTURES,INC. $162.00 LAB SUPPLIES �--i 135566 BLACK&VEATCH $31.504.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146 135567 BRENNER-FIEDLER&ASSOC..INC. $519.27 LAB SUPPLIES .� 135568 BROWN BCALDWELL CONSULTANTS $18,920.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES RE59}701 135569 BUDGET JANITORIAL $3.330.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES n 135570 BUSH&ASSOCIATES.INC. $17.162.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.&10-92 I--. 135571 CH2M HILL S8.410.32 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-31 135572 CRC PRESS,INC. $42.50 LAB SUPPLIES 135M CRTC-CWPCA,INC. $315.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 135574 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $19,049.64 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pi-3B.Pl-34 135575 FIBERGRATE/CHEMWEST $3,146.30 PUMP PARTS 135576 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $30.97 SERVICE AGREEMENT - 135577 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $786.69 LAB SUPPLIES 135578 COMPUSA,INC. $4,314.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135679 CONNEL GM PARTS/DIV. $187.57 TRUCK PARTS 135580 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $1,636.75 ELECTRIC PARTS 135581 CONSOLIDATED REPOGRAPHICS $49.84 PRINTING SERVICES 135582 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $194.93 TOOLS 135583 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO. $2,230.43 CHLORINE MQAM-91 135554 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $10,823.00 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 135585 DAPPER TIRE $413.76 TIRES 135586 PETER C.DAVID CO. $27,620.10 CONSTRUCTION 7-20 135587 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $4,788.57 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-11A3 135588 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $122.84 PRINTING 135589 DANNY L.DILLON $10.000.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 135590 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY $620.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 135591 DUNKEL BROS MACH.MOVING S641.25 EQUIPMENT MOVING FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/94 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/09/9/ POSTING DATE 02/09/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135592 EASTMAN,INC. $5,380.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135593 EDWARDS DIV.OF GS BLDG SYS. $833.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135594 EMERGENCY LIFELINE INC. $1,356.03 EMERGENCY SUPPLIES 135695 ENCHANTER,INC. $5.040.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 135596 ENTECH LAB AUTOMATION $223.25 LAB EQUIPMENT 135597 ESSENCE GROUP $480.94 COMPUTER PARTS 135598 FST SAND AND GRAVEL,INC. $339.40 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 135599 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $747.79 AIR FREIGHT 135600 FERRELLGAS $68.10 PROPANE 135601 FILTER SUPPLY CO. $1,020.18 FILTERS 135602 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $216.45 LAB SUPPLIES 135603 FOOTHILL PROJECT MANAGEMENT $1.669.00 RESIDENT NOTIFICATION SERVICES 135604 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $8,440.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES 135805 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $150.38 PHOTO SUPPLIES 136606 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $12.066.96 WATER USE 135607 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $2.160.00 APPLICATION FEE 135608 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $257.25 PERMIT FEE m 135609 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $346.10 PAINT SUPPLIES X 136610 THE FOXBORO CO. $313.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES Z 135611 FREEDOM IMAGING $60.85 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135612 FREEMEN ALTERNATIVE RESOURCES $4.758.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 135613 CITY OF FULLERTON $99.45 WATER USE 135614 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $3,708.76 CHEMICALS n 135815 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORPORATION $50.000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-ISA 135618 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4,422.27 TELEPHONE SERVICES N 135617 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $630.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 135618 GRASSY S.T.I. $1,437.27 CENTRAL GENERATION PARTS 135619 DGA CONSULTANTS $2,860.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.&V1 92 135620 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO. $240.00 TRUCK PARTS 135621 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $432.17 MECHANICAL PARTS 135622 HEATHER HICKERSON $1,211.86 VEHICLE DAMAGE 135623 HOLMES&RARVER,INC. $43,975.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1d4 135624 HOME DEPOT 5229A0 HARDWARE 135625 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN $68.91 BICYCLE PARTS 135626 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $77,819.65 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11.18-92 135627 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $460.91 CONNECTORS 135620 INTERMEC $161.06 LAB SUPPLIES 135629 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $852.67 BATTERIES 135630 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $132.36 WATER USE 135631 JAY'S CATERING $374.98 DIRECTORS'MEETING EXPENSE 135632 JENSEN TOOLS,INC. $134.08 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 135633 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $934.95 ELECTRIC PARTS 135634 KAMAN BEARINGS&SUPPLY $1.790.81 MACHINE SUPPLIES 135635 THE KEITH COMPANIES $5,423.29 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3.36R 1356M KING BEARING, INC. $1.459.37 MACHINE SUPPLIES 135637 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $500.23 TOOLS as FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2103194 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/09M POSTING DATE 02/0901 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135638 LEGI-TECH $320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 135639 LEE&RO CONSULTING ENGR. $43.581.03 ENGINEERING SERVICES P140-1&2 135640 LORAIN PRODUCTS $1.251.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 1351141 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $970.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 135542 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $477.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135643 MPS $117.34 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 135SN MACOMCO $412.86 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135645 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $373.90 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135M MATT-CHLOR,INC. 5807.62 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 135647 RS MEANS CO.,INC. $00.42 PUBLICATION 135648 MERIDIAN DIAGNOSTICS,INC. 3298.75 LAB SUPPLIES 135649 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS $75.332.80 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENTS 135650 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING 33.815.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 135651 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $211.82 LAB SUPPLIES 135652 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,308.24 UNIFORM RENTALS 135653 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $1.020.00 LAB SERVICES 135654 MONTROY SUPPLY CO. $49.82 SIGNS 135655 MOTION INDUSTRIES,INC. $978.07 PUMP PARTS f71 X 135SSS NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $89.36 SAFETY FILM RENTALS = 135657 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $1,931.91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135658 NEW AGE WATER TECHNOLOGY $9.02 VALVES .-i 135669 NEW ENGLAND BIOLABS.INC. $356.40 LAB SUPPLIES 1 135660 CRY OF NEWPORT BEACH 54.79 WATER USE a 135661 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. 5251.23 TRUCK PARTS 135652 ORANGE COURIER 5257.00 COURIER SERVICES W 1356S3 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1,252.11 FITTINGS 135664 ORRICK HERRINGTON&SUTCLIFFE $30,000.00 SPECIAL COUNCIL-TAXABLE COMMER.PAPER M.O.11-10-93 135WS OXYGEN SERVICE $2,940.98 SPECIALTY GASES 136666 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $10.989.05 REIMBURSE WORKERS'COMP.INSURANCE 135667 PSI $385.50 STEAM CLEANING SERVICES 135668 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OC) $40.84 OPERATING SUPPLIES 135669 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $8,624.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135070 PACIFIC PARTS $452.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135671 PACIFIC PNEUMATICS.INC. $47.52 FILTER 135672 PACIFIC PUBLISHERS $124.64 PUBLICATION 135873 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $214.65 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135674 PACIFIC BELL $691.83 TELEPHONE SERVICES 135576 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $159.65 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 135676 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLY $939.90 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 135877 PALMIERI,TYLER.WIENER, $1,33&90 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 135678 PARAGON CABLE $3638 CABLE SERVICES 135679 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $179.69 LAB SUPPLIES 136680 VULCAN PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS $48.066.57 CHEMICALS 135681 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $141.796.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5.8-91 - 135682 PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP. $183,18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 135683 POLYPURE,INC. $16,B13.37 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/94 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/09/94 POSTING DATE 02/09/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135684 POWER DESIGN $6.107.32 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 135655 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $59SA3 SOIL TESTING 135686 PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT.,INC. $6.048.40 CONSULTING SERVICES-FINANCIAL 135687 QUEST MEDIA&SUPPLIES $1.297.24 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1356BB QUESTRON CORP. $2,470.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135689 RMB ENGINEERINGIMILLTRONICS $4,663.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135690 RM CONTROLS $421.05 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135691 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $6.093.19 ELECTRIC MOTORS 135692 R.S.CABINET CO. $323.25 PLAN HOLD CABINET 135693 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $1,130A3 LAB SUPPLIES 135694 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $2,624.86 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135695 ROBBINS SCIENTIFIC $301.76 LAB SUPPLIES 135696 ROSEMOUNT.INC. $62.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135697 RYAN-HERCO $463.08 METAL 135698 S&J CHEVROLET $490.12 TRUCK REPAIRS 135699 SKC WEST $840.60 SAFETY SUPPLIES 136700 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1.742.28 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135701 DOUG SARVIS $750.00 CPR/FIRSTAIDTRAINING f71 135702 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP. $156,932.28 CONSTRUCTION 536 X 135703 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $683.56 SPECIALTY GASES 2 135705 CRY OF SEAL SUPPLY $217.92 WATER USE � 135705 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1,217.92 TOOLS -1 135706 SHEPHERD MACHINERY CO. $436.48 TRUCKPARTS n 135707 SHURELUCK SALES $2.878.65 TOOLSBUIRDWARE 135708 SIDU MFG CO. $3,294.29 PLUMBING SUPPLIES r 135709 SIGNAL FLASH CO. $460.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 135710 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC $1,065.50 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 135711 SMITH-EMERY CO. $60.00 SOIL TESTING M.0]-17-91 135712 SMITH PIPE&SUPPLY $56.57 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135713 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $259.24 TOOLS 135714 SOFFA ELECTRIC,INC. $92,424.15 CONSTRUCTION J-28 135715 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $16,895.81 POWER 135716 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $9.895.79 NATURAL GAS 135717 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $7,232.10 DIESEUUNLEADED FUEL 135718 SOUTH PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL $2,941.58 CHEMICALS 135719 SOUTH SHORE WINDOW MAINT. $2.083.34 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 135720 SOUVENIR PHOTO $829.15 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 136721 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $3,080.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 135722 WESTALLOY,INC. $478.73 WELDING SUPPLIES 135723 SPEX INDUSTRIES,INC. $657.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135724 STANDARD REGISTER CO. $635.84 LAB SUPPLIES 136726 STATE STREET BANK $5.847.71 TRUSTEE SERVICES 135726 GARY G.STREED $7,882.72 REIMS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING&TRAVEL 135727 SUMMIT STEEL $4.056.03 METAL 135728 SUPERB ONE-HOUR PHOTO $10.74 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 135729 SUPER CHEM CORP. $810.87 CHEMICALS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2103/94 PAGE 05 , REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/09/94 POSTING DATE 02RW94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135730 TCH ASSOCIATES $1.279.40 LAB SUPPLIES 135731 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $1,506.04 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 135732 TEKDRAULICS $7.085.56 MECHANICAL PARTS 135733 TEKTRONIX,INC. $3,191.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135734 TEXAS ANALYTICAL CONTROLS $1,630.29 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 135735 THOMAS BROS MAPS $197.95 PRINTING 135736 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $2,004.89 MECHANICAL PARTS 135737 TIS TROPICAL FISH $118.63 LAB SUPPLIES 135738 TONY'S LOCK 8 SAFE SERVICE $169.91 LOCKS 8 KEYS 135739 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $1,271.00 TRAVEL SERVICES 135740 TRUCK B AUTO SUPPLY,INC. $1.095.55 TRUCK PARTS 136741 TRUCO,INC. $94.82 LAB SUPPLIES 135742 TRUESDAIL LABS $2,261.78 LAB SERVICES 135743 TWINING LABORATORIES $5,479,44 LAB SERVICES 135744 U.S.AUTO GLASS CENTERS $162.86 TRUCK PARTS 135745 UHLER INC. $166,163.40 - CONSTRUCTION S-3295-33 135746 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $375.G5 PARCEL SERVICES m 135747 UNITED STATES BIOCHEMICAL $214.47 LAB SUPPLIES X 135748 UPCHURCH SCIENTIFIC $418.50 LAB SUPPLIES = 135749 VWR SCIENTIFIC $4.746.71 LAB SUPPLIES pp 135750 VALIN CORPORATION $100.90 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES �-+ 135751 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $644.89 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135752 VERTEX SYSTEMS $1.631.95 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 135753 WEST COAST INSTRUMENTS $737.72 GAUGE I 1357M WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $24,071.61 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 135755 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO. $157.10 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 135756 WHATMAN LAB SALES,INC. $995.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135757 WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT INST. $212.50 PUBLICATION 135758 JOHN WILEY 8 SONS,INC. $371.00 PUBLICATION 135759 ROURKE.WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $22,376.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 135760 XEROX CORP. $176.18 COPIER LEASES 135761 GEORGE YARDLEY CO. $947.96 VALVES TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 07/09/94 - $1,572,880.63 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/O3/94 PAGE 06 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/09M POSTING DATE 02/09/94 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $8,237.84 #2 OPER FUND 24,975.26 #3 OPER FUND 41,139.09 #3 CAP FAC FUND 5,423.29 05 OPER FUND 4.742.90 95 CAP FAC FUND 324,724.28 #6 OPER FUND 4,854.24 #7 OPER FUND 7,305.05 #7 CAP FAC FUND 37,349.38 011 OPER FUND 7,386.64 #11 CAP FAC FUND 5,029.60 #13 OPER FUND 102,84 #14 OPER FUND 732.40 m #14 CAP FAC FUND 2.09742 x #5&6 OPER FUND 3.146.30 Z #596 CAP FAC FUND 7.841.85 #6&7 OPER FUND 16.10 JT OPER FUND 538,036.05 CORF 385.751,73 n SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 12.700 91 T JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 151.387.48 $1,572,850.63 PUND NO' 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2116194 PAGE 01 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 223/94 POSTING DATE 2/23194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 135793 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES $809.80 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135794 AG TECH COMPANY $55,896.30 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10.9.91 135795 AT&T $3.566.35 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 135796 AT&T $301.98 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 136797 AIR COLD SUPPLY,INC. $63.34 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS 135798 AMELCO CONSTRUCTION 5225,652.50 CONSTRUCTION P2.53.1 135799 AMERICAN AIR FILTER,INC. $1,379.20 MECHANICAL PARTS 135800 AMERICAN CABLING&COMM. 550.54 CABLE 135801 AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION $59.00 LAB SUPPLIES 135802 AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO. $4,876.00 CONSTRUCTION PZ-51 136603 AMICK CONSTRUCTION CO. $22,548.50 SEWER REPAIRS 135604 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $500.00 SEWER REPAIRS 135805 ANIXTER-DISTRIBUTION $4.20 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 135606 APCO VALVE&PRIMER CORP. $957.90 VALVES 135607 APEX DRUM CO. $173.00 DRUM PICK-UP 135608 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $1,574.07 NOTICES&ADS 135609 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS,INC. $5.403.04 LAB SUPPLIES 135810 ACS(APPLIED COMPUTER SOLUTION) $718.30 COMPUTER SOFTWARE m 135811 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,291.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES X 135012 ARMOR-VAC 5420.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 136813 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE,INC. $1,411.00 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL Ly 135814 ASSOC.ADMINIS.&CONSULTANTS $7,865.72 SFI INSURANCE ADMINISTRATORS 135815 ATKIWJONES COMPUTER SERVICE $321.30 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135816 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $5,394.89 PAYROLL SERVICES trl 135817 THE AVEBURY GROUP $5,995.68 MECHANICAL PARTS I 135810 AWARDS&TROPHIES $434.88 PLAQUES 135818 BAILEY CONTROLS COMPANY $1,086.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135820 BANANA BLUEPRINT $7,077.42 PRINTING M.O.10-10-90 135821 BANK OF THE WEST $2,962.04 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION J-23.2 135822 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $928.85 BATTERIES 135823 BAUER COMPRESSOR $957.74 COMPRESSOR PARTS 135824 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS,INC. $3,518.34 LAB SUPPLIES 135825 DON C.BEATTIE P.E. $2,800.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 13SS28 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS . $856.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135827 BELL SECURITY $1,068.13 SECURITY SERVICES 135828 BIOMERIEUX VTTEK,INC. $4.750.57 LAB SUPPLIES 135829 BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS,INC. $110.43 LAB SUPPLIES 135830 BLACK&VEATCH 525,807.11 ENGINEERING SERVICES P146 135831 BOERINGER MANNHEIM $368.63 LAB SUPPLIES 135832 SON-A-RUES $378.88 TRUCK PARTS 135833 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP. $38,927.52 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-18,7-19 135834 BRADY USA,INC. 586.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135835 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $228.73 ELECTRIC PARTS 135838 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $110.46 PUBLICATION 135837 BUSH&ASSOCIATES,INC. $1,768.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-1692 135830 BUY-CHEM DISTRIBUTORS $265.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FUNO NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16/94 PAGE 02 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 2123/94 POSTING DATE 223194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135839 CEPA $250.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135540 CS COMPANY $2,408.18 VALVES 135841 CALTROL, INC. $1,934.82 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135842 CARLETON ENGINEERS $4,154.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES-AIR QUALITY 135843 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $69,496.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33,J-34 135844 CENTURY SAFETY INST.&SUPPLY $15.788.40 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135845 CERFNET $17.10 COMPUTER SERVICES 135946 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING $4,810.23 PUMP 135841 COLE-PALMER INSTRUMENT CO. $57.51 LAB SUPPLIES 13SUB COUCH&SONS $676,489.70 CONSTRUCTION 5.374 135649 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1,388.23 PUMP PARTS 135850 COMPUTER DATACOM $147.49 COMPUTER HARDWARE 135851 COMPUSA,INC. $4,870.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135852 CONNEL GM PARTS I DIV. $155.99 TRUCK PARTS 135853 CONNER PERIPHERALS,INC. $510.60 OFFICE MACHINE REPAIRS 135854 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $11,082.07 ELECTRIC PARTS 135855 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC. $630.00 TOOLS rn 135856 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C $10,300.41 CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.7-17-91 X 135857 COOPER INDUSTRIES,INC. $2.440.31 CENTRAL GEN.ENGINE PARTS = 135858 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $1,223.27 TRUCK PARTS dy 135859 COSTA MESA SANITARY DISTRICT $21,150.00 CONNECTION FEE REFUND 135860 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $214.45 ELECTRIC PARTS 135861 DAILY PILOT $60.00 NOTICES&ADS dy 135862 DARTEK COMPUTER SUPPLY $122.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 135663 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $3.100.95 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.801-93 N 1350" DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $753.71 PRINTING 135865 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP. $4,985.31 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 135866 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE,INC. $1.397.39 HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL M.0.1-13-92 135867 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $8,242.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE&REPAIRS 135868 DORADO ENTERPRISES,INC. $70,562.53 CONSTRUCTION P146A 135869 ROBERT F.DRIVER ASSOC. $5.400.00 MEDICAL INSURANCE CONSULTANT 135870 DUNN EDWARDS CORP. $2.065.86 PAINT SUPPLIES 135871 ESP NORTH $127.59 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 135872 EASTMAN,INC. $6.468.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135873 EDWARDS HIGH VACUUM INTER. $11.95 LAB SUPPLIES 135874 ENCHANTER,INC. $3.360.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.8-10.92 135875 MARSHALL PARRIES $76.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 135876 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. $357.50 AIR FREIGHT 135877 FERRELLGAS $120.49 PROPANE 135878 CHEMWEST,INC. $2.120.00 FIBERGLASS 135879 FISCHER&PORTER CO. $1,367.14 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 135880 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO. $144.81 LAB SUPPLIES 135881 FISIONS INSTRUMENTS $37.47 LAB SUPPLIES 135882 CLIFFORD A.FORKERT $15,606.25 SURVEYING SERVICES M.OAAG-92 135883 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $228.47 PHOTO SUPPLIES 135884 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $9,081.94 BUILDING PERMIT FEES J-23-1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16/94 PAGE 03 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 2/23194 POSTING DATE 223/94 WARRANTNO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135885 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $2.11 PAINT SUPPLIES 135886 FREY ENVIRONMENTAL,INC. $666.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 135887 FURON DEKORON $95.00 CABLE 135888 DST,INC. $1.210.85 COMPUTER PARTS 135889 GANAHL LUMBER CO. $747.33 LUMBER/HARDWARE 135890 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1,656.12 CHEMICALS 135891 GEAR TECH $4,000.00 MACHINE INSPECTION 135892 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $335A4 ELECTRIC PARTS 135893 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. $4,273,95 TELEPHONE SERVICES 135894 GEORGE LEECH&ASSOCIATES $75.23 FLOWMETERS 135895 GIERUCH-MITCHELL,INC. $8,741.68 MECHANICAL PARTS 135896 W W GRAINGER,INC. $354.82 ELECTRIC PARTS 135897 GRASEBY ANDERSON $4,283.01 LAB SUPPLIES 135898 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $1,355.61 PRINTING 135899 DGA CONSULTANTS $1,885.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 135900 HSO TECHNOLOGY $114,519.83 CONSTRUCTION J-232 135901 HB TYPE&GRAPHICS $12.93 PRINTING m 135902 HACH COMPANY $19170 CHEMICALS >K 135903 FREDA.HARPER $1.500,00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION Z 135904 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC $843.77 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 135905 HATCH&KIRK,INC. $588.42 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 135906 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS $1,925.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 135907 PL HAWN CO,INC. $136.39 FILTERS by 135906 HELLO $39.09 OFFICE SUPPLIES I 135909 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT $2.083.33 WORKERS COMP CLAIMS ADMIN. W 135910 HEWLETT PACKARD $400.00 OFFICE MACHINE 135911 HOERSIGER CVS CALIF.,INC. $292.67 MECHANICAL PARTS 135912 HOLMES&NARVER,INC. $69,040.91 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-44 135913 HOME DEPOT $1.048.71 HARDWARE 135914 HOOKER'S REPAIR SERVICE $55.00 LAB EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 135915 RS HUGHES CO,INC. $1.677.17 PAINT SUPPLIES 135916 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $25.08 WATER USE 136917 IDEKX $403.95 LAB SUPPLIES 135918 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $15,288.13 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92 135919 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $663.75 CONNECTORS 135920 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $573.82 BATTERIES 136921 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $34.66 WATER USE 135922 ISCO $1,842.53 LAB EQUIPMENT 135923 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPPLY. $1,025.82 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 135924 JAVID CONTRACTORS,INC. $67,912.85 CONSTRUCTION P2-23-5.1 135US JIM'S SUSPENSION SERVICE $76.00 TRUCK REPAIRS 135926 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,008.26 ELECTRIC PARTS 135927 JONES CHEMICALS,INC. $1.968.94 CHEMICALS 135928 THE KEITH COMPANIES $2,637.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-36R 135929 KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORP. $192.82 FREIGHT 135930 KING BEARING,INC. 53,191.91 MACHINE SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE VIRM4 PAGE 04 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 223I94 POSTING DATE 223194 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135931 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $3,523.83 HARDWARE 135932 L A CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO. $571.64 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 135933 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO. $375.62 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135934 LEWCO ELECTRIC $263.07 TRUCK PARTS 135935 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS.CO. $3.030.21 DEFERRED COMP TRUSTEE 135936 K.P.LINDSTROM,INC. $7.600.00 CONSULTING SERVICES-ENVIRONMENTAL 135937 MPS $474.04 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 1359M MACOMCO $520.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT 135939 MSA $700.97 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135940 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION,INC. $664.168.00 CONSTRUCTION P242-2 135941 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $120.79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135942 MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS..INC. $4,135.59 METERS 135943 MEASUREMENT VARIABLES $1.848.56 ELECTRIC PARTS 135944 MIDWAY MFG.&MACHINING $4.617.13 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 135945 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. $153.40 FITTINGS 136946 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES S203.14 MECHANICAL PARTS 135947 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.603.32 UNIFORM RENTALS 135948 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO. $70.00 ELECTRIC PARTS IT1 135949 MOORE PRODUCTS CO. $990.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS X 135950 NASCO WEST,INC. $299.69 LAB SUPPLIES 135951 NATIONAL FILTER MEDIA CORP. $4.258.61 MECHANICAL PARTS 135952 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES $2.432.50 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 135953 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY $218.09 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 135954 NEAL SUPPLY CO. $817.71 PLUMBING SUPPLIES Co 135955 NORCAL CONTROLS,INC. $629.36 COMPRESSOR PARTS r 135957 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE ,437.40 PUBLICATION 135958 ORACLE ORPOCORP $2.100.00 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 135959 ORACLE CORPORATION $2,220.97 TRAINING REGISTRATION 135959 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS CO. $228.97 TRUCK PARTS 135960 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE $202.03 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 135961 ORANGE COURIER $133.50 COURIER SERVICES 135952 ORANGE VALVE&FITTING CO. $1.926.28 FITTINGS 135963 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.745.83 SPECIALTY GASES 135964 PC SYSTEMS DESIGN $138.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 135965 P&S FILTRATION,INC. $2.903.18 MECHANICAL PARTS 135966 PACIFIC PARTS $809.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135967 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO. $6.492.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135968 PACIFIC BELL $154.83 TELEPHONE SERVICES 135969 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING CO. $188.40 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 135970 PADGETT-THOMPSON $395.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 135971 PAGENET $2,054.24 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 135972 PASCAL&LUDWIG ENGINEERS $13,241.70 CONSTRUCTION J32 135973 PASCAL&LUDWIG,INC. $128,600.60 CONSTRUCTION PI-38-2 135974 PASCALANDLUDWIG $173,160.00 CONSTRUCTION P243.1 135975 PASCAL&LUDWIG $27.810.00 CONSTRUCTION PI42 135976 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $274.69 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/16194 PAGE 05 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 2123194 POSTING DATE 2Q3/94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 135977 PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS,INC. $18,129.58 CHEMICALS 135970 PICKWICK PAPER $305.02 STORAGE BOXES 135979 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS,INC. $127.937.80 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8.91 135980 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES $163.60 PLASTIC BOTTLES 135981 POLY ENTERPRISES,INC. $301.70 SAFETY SUPPLIES 135982 POLYPURE,INC. $18.198.90 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 135983 POSTAGE BY PHONE $5,000.00 POSTAGE 135984 POWER DESIGN $20.364.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS 135985 POWER PUMPS,INC. $196.38 PUMP PARTS 135986 POWER TRACK,INC. $159.69 PUMP PARTS 135987 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $62.00 ICE 135988 AOUA-CHEM.INC. $12,714.50 BOILER 135989 QUEST MEDIA&SUPPLIES $957.78 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 135990 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES.INC. $13,641.60 CMMS STAFF TRAINING M.O.8-12-92 135991 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS $374.97 ELECTRIC MOTORS 135992 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO. $1.682.71 TRASH REMOVAL 135993 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO. $2,096.77 LAB SUPPLIES fn 135994 DR.SHIVAJI RAMALINGAM $1,522.50 LAB SUPPLIES x 135995 RED VALVE CO.,INC. $1.312.67 VALVES 2 135995 DRESDNER BANK WEINHEIM $277.56 PUBLICATIONS 135997 RED WING SHOES 8207.74 SAFETY SHOES to 135998 BOLT DELIVERY $35.44 FREIGHT —I 135999 THE REGISTER $1,087.09 NOTICES&ADS 136000 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $5,036.97 PLUMBING SUPPLIES i 138001 RICH COLOR LAB $51.18 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES In 136002 RYAN-NERCO $1,504.33 PUMP PARTS 136003 JOSEPH T.RYERSON&SON,INC. $636.94 TUBING 136004 SKC WEST $1,334.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES 136005 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $830.89 ELECTRIC PARTS 136006 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $269.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136007 DOUG SARVIS $750.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 130008 SCHWING AMERICA $3,009.78 PUMP PARTS 136OD9 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES,INC. $999.92 SPECIALTY GASES 136010 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS,INC. $992.00 LAB REPAIRS 136011 LUDECA,INC. $1,140.57 MECHANICAL PARTS 136012 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $118.31 TOOLS 136013 SHURELUCK SALES $9,801.03 TOOLS/HARDWARE 136014 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION $253.34 LAB SUPPLIES 136015 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO. $179.83 LAB SUPPLIES 136016 SMITH-EMERY CO. $1.683.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 138017 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. $92.03 TOOLS 136018 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $5.376.25 PERMIT FEES 135019 SOUTH COAST WATER $466.49 SERVICE AGREEMENT 138020 SO CALIF.EDISON CO. $39,674.11 POWER 136021 SO.CAL.GAS.CO. $363.457.33 NATURAL GAS 136022 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO. $9.388.45 DIESEVUNLEADED FUEL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2 ISM PAGE OS REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 223194 POSTING DATE 2=94 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 130023 SOUVENIR PHOTO $67.81 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 136024 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2.347.46 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 136025 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO.,INC. $1,393.94 METER 136026 STAMEN Z.SPASSOFF P.E. $8.100.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 136027 WESTALLOY,INC. $416.68 WELDING SUPPLIES 136028 SPECTRUM CHEMICAL $104.18 LAB SUPPLIES 136029 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCE SYSTEM $5,18625 SERVICE AGREEMENT 136030 SRECO FLEXIBLE $2,319.14 TRUCK PARTS 136031 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS $950.00 LAB EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 136032 STRATAGENE $216.73 LAB SUPPLIES 136033 GARY G.STREED $3,955.76 REINS.PETTY CASH,TRAINING 8 TRAVEL 136034 SUMMITSTEEL $7.281.64 METAL 136035 SUNSET FORD $117.05 TRUCK PARTS 136036 SUPER CHEM CORP. $684.26 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 136037 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $156.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 136038 TARBY ENGINEERING $3,848.00 PUMP PARTS 136039 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG.COMPANY $1.255.71 ELECTRIC DART PARTS M 136040 TERRY'S CAMERA $825.67 CAMERA EQUIPMENT X 136041 TEXTILE ENGINEERING ASSOC, $3.176.00 MECHANICAL PARTS = 136042 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $489.44 MECHANICAL PARTS dp 136043 TILE MATTERS $154.64 PAINT SUPPLIES 136W TONTS LOCK&SAFE SERVICE $505.42 LOCKS&KEYS 136045 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $912.00 TRAVEL SERVICES Cp 136046 JG TUCKER&SON,INC. $1,235.16 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1 130D47 TUSTIN DODGE $300.15 TRUCK PARTS 136048 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $451.00 LAB SUPPLIES 136049 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $260.49 PARCEL SERVICES 136050 UNITED SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTS $134.82 LAB SUPPLIES 136051 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2,548.07 LAB SUPPLIES 136052 VAUN CORPORATION $525.31 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 136063 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO. $711.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136054 VARIAN ASSOCIATES.INC. $639.27 LAB SUPPLIES 136055 WATER ENVIRONMENTAL FED. $2,271.15 PUBLICATION 136056 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $10.625.96 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 136057 WESCO $640.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS 136058 B.L.WILCOX&ASSOC. $123.38 PUMP PARTS 136059 WTTEG $411.61 LAB SUPPLIES 136050 ROURKE.WOODRUFF&SPRADLIN $64.642.76 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 136061 XEROX CORP. $2.890.94 COPIER LEASES 136062 EVERETT H.YORK CO. $1,001.32 CENTRAL GENERATION PARTS 136C63 RICHARD B.EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 0223/94 $3.504.904.25 - FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE W16M PAGE 07 a REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 2/23194 POSTING DATE 2/23194 SUMMARY AMOUNT #2 OPER FUND $2,624.03 02 CAP FAC FUND 108.05 #3 OPER FUND 14,083.79 #3 CAP FAC FUND 2,675.42 #5 OPER FUND 714.54 #6 CAP FAC FUND 21,475.30 #7 OPER FUND 3.382.19 #7 CAP FAC FUND 38,977.87 011 OPER FUND 6,314.35 #11 CAP PAC FUND 1,786A0 #14 OPER FUND 112.00 #14 CAP FAC FUND 428.04 9187 OPER FUND 320.10 $586 OPER FUND 1,357.24 fTl #S8B CAP FAC FUND 677,374.70 X #fi87 OPER FUND 2,103.18 s #7814 OPER FUND 298.18 JT OPER FUND 803,402.14 CORF 1.840.590.58 SELF-FUNDED INSURANCE FUND 25,613A1 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 152,171.14 V 53,504,804.25 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 .2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on //` y 19� was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 19�. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this JAA4 day of Pe y Kyle, 1 n Secre ary o each of the oar of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 6 14 of Orange County, California F27A.1 PNlTA7fON i o4olimn 01 CIS, 1t �� op T O U y o ,li . N Since 1954 ORgNGE COON DESIGN and CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS MARCH 1994 [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ It [ [ [ [ REVISION DATE: 3194 JOINT WORKS CONTRACTS BID FINAL JOB NO. TITLE DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. J-1 OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 1-LAND SECTION J-2 OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2-MARINE SECTION J-2-1 OCEAN OUTFALL DIFFUSER 9-10-64 Carollo $332.000 J SmithfW ..on $333,573.00 9-23-64 9-8-65 $333,573.00 J-3 OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION, Hoagland-FrMley& PLANT NO. 2 3.13-59 Carollo $426,000 Kemper $413.380.00 4-9-59 9-6-59 $414,808-23 J-3A ENGINE DRIVE UNIT 2-27-61 Carollo $70,000 Waukesha Motor $36,757.00 3-8-61 10-11.61 $36,757.00 AND BOOSTER PUMPING UNIT 2.1-61 Carollo Johnson Pump Co. $25,361.00 3-8-61 10-11-61 $25,361.00 J-3-1 INSTALLATION OF THREE GAS ENGINES WITH GEAR DRIVES AT ROTHROCK OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION 2-6-79 OCSD $479.922 Pascal& Ludwig $247,225.00 3.14-79 1-14-81 $285,735.25 J-4& P2-3 EXPANSION OF PLANT NO. 2(see P2-3)------------------------------------------ Houglend-Findlay& Kemper ---------------------------------------------_.-.------—_._. J-4A 750 KVA DISTRIBUTION SERVICE TRANSFORMER FOR PLANT NO. 2 11-9-70 CAROLLO $10,000 GENERAL ELECTRIC $8.6E5.35 11-12-70 2-1-71 $6.685.35 J-4-1 INCREASED WATER REUSE FACILITIES AT PLANT NO.2 (FED.GRANT NO.C-06-0649) 9.26-72 Cerollo $550,000 Zisberth/Zeberth& Alper $611,000.00 10-11-72 4.10.74 $627,837.44 J-4-2 CHLORINATION FACILITIES REFURBISHMENT AT TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 9.12-78 OCSD $1101000 Equinoz-Malibu $137,500.00 9-13-78 4-11-79 $138,186.45 J-4-2-1 CHLORINATION FACILITY REFURBISHMENT AT TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 6-8-82 Vann 040,000 Weldinger Corp. 047,169.00 6-19-82 3.9-83 $60,101.74 J-5A SUPERVISORY CONTROL HOUSE 11-17-61 Carollo $65,000 L.A.Chapman $93.081.00 11-22-61 5-9-62 $95,562.00 J-58 MATERIALS FOR SUPERVISORY CONTROL Mnpls-Honeywell FACILITIES 11-17-61 Carollo $235.000 Regulator Co. $209,033.00 11.22.61 3-13-53 $214,166.00 J-SC INSTALLATION OF CONTROL FACILITIES 6-13-62 Caret. $125.000 ETS-Holkin&GeWan $73,805.00 6.20-62 12-12-62 $75,414.00 Joint Work.- Paga 1 [ [ l I I . I I I I ' I [ I I I [ I I I I 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. J-513-1 PORTIONS OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL EQUIPMENT(REDESIGN) 5-1-63 Carollo $18,000 Luscombe Engrg. $18,382.89 5-10-63 12-11.63 $18,382.69 J-60.2 PORTION OF ADDITIONAL CONTROL EQUIPMENT(REDESIGNI 5-1-63 Carollo $11,000 Mnpla-Honeywell $10,849.00 5.10.63 12-11-63 $10.889.00 J-SE INSTRUMENTATION--1965 7-1-65 Carollo $50,900 Honeywell $59.446.00 7-14-65 7-13-66 $52,591.80 J-5.1 INSTRUMENTATION AND INSTALLATION FOR JOBS J-6 AND P2-25 ALL BIDS REJECTED J-6 OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION, UNIT 2 10.10-82 Carollo $490,000 Fontana Steal 4396,500.00 10-19-62 8-14-63 $391.533.00 J-BA PUMPS, DRIVES AND MOTORS 8.17.62 Carollo $260,000 Johnston Pump $182,655.20 a-22.62 3.17.64 $182,665.20 J-6B BARSCREENS AND BELT CONVEYORS 8-17-62 Carollo $43,000 Jeffrey Mfg. 917,579.00 8-22.62 7-10-63 017,579.00 J-BC 72-INCH PROPELLER METER 8-17-62 Carollo $4,500 Measure-Rita Badger Meter $3,151.20 8-22.62 5.8.63 $3,151.20 J-BD SINGLE CIRCUIT 5000 KVA SUBSTATION 8-17-62 Carollo $32,000 Gap aral Electric $24,877.00 8.22.62 6-12-63 $25,757.11 J-6E 24M VOLT MOTOR CONTROL CENTER 8-17-82 Carollo $55,000 Allis Chalmers $34,944.00 8.22.62 410-63 $34,944.00 J-6.1 ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION 9-5-74 Cerullo $1,390,000 White Superior $1,678,100.00 ALL BIDS REJECTED(10.18.74)--PROJECT DIVIDED INTO SCHEDULES A. B AND C (FORCE ACCOUNT) SEE BELOW J-6-1A SCHEDULE A: GAS ENGINES 1.21-75 OCSD $596,000 White Superior $588,342.62 2.19-75 9-8-76 $556,580.00 J-6.1B SCHEDULES RIGHT ANGLE DRIVES AND PUMPS 6.3.76 OCSD 4314,358 McCella St... $345,000.00 6-11-75 9-8-76 0356,958.92 J-6-1C SCHEDOLE C: TILTING DISC CHECK VALVES 7-22-75 OCSD $72.000 Valves&Primer $68,480.24 8-13-75 6.9.76 $68,480.24 J-e-ID INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL PUMPING FACILITIES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION 9-7-76 OCSD 0300,000 Skipper&Co. $341,791.00 9-8.76 11.9.77 $294,085.00 J-6-1 E NEW ROOF HATCHES AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION 12-1-77 OCSD $25,000 Johnson Steel $25.000 11-9.77 4.12-78 $24,300.00 J-6.11' DIGESTER GAS PIPING SYSTEM AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION 12-18.78 OCSD 417,500 Canaries Inc. $20.467.00 12-13-78 3-14-79 $22,111.24 Joint Works-Page 2 It [ L [ l [ l [ [ [ [ [ 1 l t I ! [ [ 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT. J-8-1G SHEET METAL FOR ROOFING AT OCEAN OUTFALL PUMPING STATION 12.28-78 OCSD $13.500 Terdiff Sheet Metal 86,676.00 1-10-79 9-6-79 $5,676.00 J-6.2 ELECTRICAL RELIABILITY FACILITIES AT PLANT NO.2 11.28.85 Cerollo 02,250,000 Kiewit Pacific $1,838,000.00 12-11-85 12.20.87 $2,141,194.39 Eouioment Purchases in for J-6-2 (end P1-22) J-6-2A PRE-PURCHASE 3 GENERATORS (4 FOR P1-221 10-16.85 Cerollo $1,420,000 Power System. $781,126.00 10.16-85 5.31.86 0764,313.85 J-6-2B PRE-PURCHASE 4 TRANSFORMERS (6 FOR P1.22) 10-16-85 Cerollo 8180,000 GE Supply Co. 11138,883.00 10-16-85 12-29-87 $138,883.00 J-6-2C PRE-PURCHASE SWITCHGEAR FOR BOTH JOBS 10-16.85 Carols 6610,000 Westinghouse $612,799.00 10-16-BS 11-6-87 0608,674.00 J-7 OFFICE BUILDING 7-3-63 Jordan& $135,834.00 J.Rey Construction 0134,848.00 7-10-63 5-13-64 8135,697.82 Ensley J-7-1 ALTERATIONS TO ADMINISTRATION OFFICES 7-2-68 OCSD 98.ODD Gentoei Bros. 614,824.00 8-14-64 11-13-68 014,616.60 J-7-2 ADMINISTRATION--ENGINEERING BLDG.ADDITION (See J-12) J-7-3 ADMINISTRATION.-ENGINEERING BLDG. ADDITION AND REMODEL 10-12-76 ALL BIDS REJECTED (11.10-761 --TO BE CONSTRUCTED UNDER FORCE ACCOUNT--see fallowing three lobs J-7-3A-1 HEATING, AIR CONDITIONING AND PLUMBING FOR ADMINISTRATION BUILDING REMODEL 12-21-76 OCSD $24,000 Campbell Heating $36,100.00 12-19.76/GM 9.14.77 911,115.24 J.7.3A-2 PLUMBING FOR ADMINISTRATION AND ENGINEERING BUILDING REMODEL 12.21.76 OCSD $14,000 Pacific Plumbing $10,780.00 1-1477/GM 8.10.77 $10,780.00 J-7-38 REPLACEMENT OF AIR CONDITIONING FOR ADMINISTRATION AND ENGINEERING BLDG. 2-23-78 OCSD 660,000 Campbell Heating $63,300.00 3-8-78/GM 6-13-79 $64,218.00 J-7.4 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION Pulaski & AT PLANT NO. 1 5.24.88 Adis $4,000.000 J. R.Roberts Corp. $3,549,000.00 6-8-88 4.8.92 $4,908.114.00 J-7-5 MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING ADMINISTRATION Pulaski& BUILDING Adte FURNISHINGS: Office Pavilions $938,441.00 6-8-88 (Purchase Order Contract) TELEPHONE SYSTEM EXPANSION: Centel $49,000 7.13-88 (Purchase Order Convect) SECURITY SYSTEM: Security Specialists $10,116.00 (Purchase Order Contract) Joint Work.- Page 3 [ I t t : t [ t t t t t [ t t t ! t t , t 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. J-7-5-1 PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF INTERIOR OFFICE PARTITIONING AND FURNISHINGS TO RECONFIGURE AND EXPAND THE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING OFFICES OCSD $100,000 (Purchase Order Contract to Office Pavilions-478,935.63) J-8 INSTALLATION OF 12 KV SWITCHING CENTER 4.3.63 Carollo $12,000 Ymba Linde El... $14,907.00 4-10-63 8-14.63 $15,020.00 J-8A 12 KV SWITCHING CENTER 2-1-63 Cerollo $20,000 Allis Chalmers $16.303.00 2.13-63 9-10-63 $16.303.00 J-89 12 KV SERVICE ENTRANCE EQUIPMENT 7-3-63 Cerollo $7,500 Gough Ind. $6,590.00 7-10-63 3.11-64 46,590.00 J-BC 12 KV SWITCHING CENTER ADDITIONS 6-3-64 Carols $7,000 Allis Chalmers $7,228.00 6.10.64 12-9-64 $5,028.00 J-9 OCEAN OUTFALL NO.2--LAND SECTION 5.11-66 Cerollo $1,075,000 Vmmdl corporation 111,118,000.00 5-11-66 7-12-67 $1,118,000.00 J-9-1 METER VAULT ON OCEAN OUTFALL NO.2 (Federal Grant No.C-06.0649) 10.8-70 Cerollo $17,500 Wesco Engrg.&Cons[. 06.048.00 10-14-70 12-9-70 $6.048.00 J-9-2 SURGE TOWER NO. 2 EXTENSION AT TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 2.3-76 Carolle $115,000 F.T. Meberth $73,000.00 2-17-76 9-8-76 $73.000.00 J-10 OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2—MARINE SECTION 10.9-68 Cerollo $15,150,000 Peter Kiewit Sans $8,949,000.00 12-2-68 8-11-71 68,938,396.07 J-11 LABORATORY BUILDING AT PLANT NO. 1 5-22-70 Picker $228,216 Neer-Cel Corp. $222,696.00 5-26-70 8-11-71 $229,209.74 J-11A PURCHASE OF LABORATORY EQUIPMENT (Purchase Order No. 16209) ,6-5-70 OCSD Van Waters&Rogers $8,594.46 6-10-70 4-14-71 $8.594.46 J-11B PURCHASE OF LABORATORY EQUIPMENT I2 GASCHROMATOGRAPHS A AND B(PO# 16210) 6.5.70 OCSD Hewlett Packard $12,366.86 6-10-70 4-14-71 $12,366.86 J-11C PURCHASE OF ATOMIC ABSORPTION UNIT(POA 1B211) 6-5-70 OCSD Perkin-Elmer 511,069.63 6.10-70 414-71 $11,069.63 J-11R REPLACEMENT CHILLER PACKAGE FOR LABORATORY AIR CONDITIONER 5-29-84 OCSD $30,000 Pacific Mechanical $28,647.00 413-84 2-13.85 $29,292.00 J-11.1 DEMOLITION OF LABORATORY AT PLANT NO. 1 (Admin.Anne.to be constructed on sits-- Brown/ see J-30) Caldwell Joint Works-Page 4 [ [ l [ [ ! [ [ [ [ I [ 1 [ [ : I [ [ [ i 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. J-12& J-7.2 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES (Federal Grant No.C-06-0573f Ficker $467,950 B.Miller Coned. $498.880.14 J-13 SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE BLDG., PLANT 3-6.73 Fick., $810,000 J.Rey Construction $1,119,712.00 5-2-73 8-14-74 $1,091,652.60 J-13-1 SHOPS AND WAREHOUSE SEWER LATERAL 12-1-77 OCSD $10,000 A&T Construction 012,895.00 12-14-77 4.11-78 $12,895.00 J-13-2 WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION 6-13-78 Miyake/ Lien-Woad $175,000 ALL BIDS REJECTED 47-14.781 TO BE REBID ON 9-5-79 (St.J.13.2(Rebidf J-13-2 WAREHOUSE OFFICE EXPANSION 9-5-79 Miyeke- (Rebidl Lain-Wood $175,000 Coy Atkin. $199,000 9-13.79/GM 5.14-80 $201,887.75 J-14 JOB/NUMBER DELETED J-15 OCEAN OUTFALL BOOSTER STATION"C" AT PLANT NO. 2 5-28-87 Carollo $28,000,000 Advenco Constructors $18,476,243.00 6-10-87 3-14.90 019,580,790.75 J-15A PREPURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE SYSTEMS AND PUMPS 6-3-86 Carollo 55,400,000 General Electric $4,025,440.00 6-11-86 1-12-94 $3,819,423.53 J-15B-1 PURCHASE AND INSTALL ULTRASONIC FLOWMETER FOR OCEAN OUTFALL Carollo Purchase Order Cont.No. 24023 with Sperling Instruments $41,700.00 J-158-2 VAULTS FOR ULTRASONIC FLOWMETER FOR OCEAN OUTFALL 8-26.86 Carollo $150,000 Kiewit Pacific $164,003.00 8-13-86 2-11-87 $212,523.33 J-15-1 RAISING SURGE TOWER NO. 20N OCEAN OUTFALL 9.23.86 Carollo 02,300,000 Adyenco Constructors $1,933,085.00 10.29.86 3.24-88 $2,044,288.10 J-16 LIGHTING CONSERVATION FACILITIES AT PLANTS 1 AND 2 3-1-88 Boyle $400,000 Pacific Electric $538,000.00 3-9-88 5-10-89 $581,398.00 J-17 CENTRAL LABORATORY 11-29-88 Boyle $4,000,00 J.R. Roberta Corp. $7,090,000.00 12.13.89 8.14-92 $8,153,002.07 J-17.1 FURNISHING OF NEW MOLECULAR MICRO- BIOLOGY LABORATORY OCSD Purchase order contract. Joint Works-Page 5 I t I t : I 1 It I I I t i 1 t [ t 1 t 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. J-17-2 CENTRAL LABORATORY ELECTRICAL UPGRADES,AND TEST PLUG INSTALLATION AT PLANTS 1 AND 2 (Bid with p1-36-1 of el) OCSD Adyanc0 $75,001.00 12-8-93 J-18 INSTRUMENTATION IMPROVEMENTS (Replaced by Job No.P240.-sea that line item) J-19 CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS Brown& (Prima Number) Design Caldwell $51,000.000 J-19-1 CENTRAL POWER GENERATION Brown Is SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 11-6-90 Caldwell 916,000.000 Hunter Corporation $15,410,855.00 12-12-90 2.9.94 $17.112,767.00 J-19-2 CENTRAL POWER GENERATION Brown& SYSTEM AT PLANT NO.2 1-3040 Caldwell $20,000,000 Brinderson Corp. $19,753,000.00 2-14-90 J-19A PREPURCHASE ENGINES FOR CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS AT BOTH PLANTS Brown& INagotiatad purchase contract) Caldwell 920,000,000 Cooper Industries 918,968,113.00 $21,011,395.00 J-20 WAREHOUSE AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING, AND OIL STORAGE AND Pulaski& DISPENSING IMPROVEMENTS 12-20.88 Arita 92,000,000 J. R.Roberts Corp. $3,266,000.00 2-8-89 11-14.90 $3,712,875.44 J-21 REPLACEMENT OF WASTE DIGESTER GAS FLARES AT PLANT NO. 1 I1-6-90 OCSD Advance Constructors 6400,001.00 12-12.90 1-13-93 $440,793.00 J-22 REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL Design J-22-1 REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL 1portion under Pacific Coast Hwy.) (Cooperative project with CALTRANS as part of Santa Ana River Widening Moffit and project) Nichols 92,000,000 Rados(Under contract with CALTRANSI J-22-2 REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL (portion from P2 southerly line to Ocean Outfall Booster Station) (Combined with 1-8 for construction) 7-2-91 Carollo Colich&Sons $1,320,000.00 7.17-91 12-8.93 $1,350,526.00 Joint Works-Page 6 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. J-23-1 CONTROL CENTER/OPERATIONS AND Brown and MAINTENANCE BUILDING (bid w/P2-44) 1-22-91 Caldwell $3,200,000 J.R.Roberta Corp. 43,675,000.00 2-13-91 3.10-93 $3,828,428.00 J-23-2 PLANT 1 CONTROL CENTER INSTRUMENTATION 5.21-91 EMA Serv32,500,000 HBO Technology $1,795,000.00 7.17-91 J-24 INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT INFLUENT METERS 1.23-90 Wllldan $250.000 P. R. Burka Industrial 8214,464.00 2-14-90 2.27.90 $236,194.81 J-24A PREPURCHASE ELEVEN FISCHER PORTER METERS (Purchase Order Contract) Fischer and Porter 9170,736.00 12-14.88 J-248 REHABILITATION OF SIX EXISTING KROHNE METERS IPumhase Order Conttactl Krohne America 133,136.00 J-26-1 COMPUTERIZED FACILITIES' RECORD AND DRAWING SYSTEM Black and Phase 1--Needs Assessment Veatch Phase 11--Computer System Acquisition Phase III--System Development J-25-2 POWER STUDIES FOR PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2 J-26 NEW PERSONNEL BUILDING AT PLANT 1 $1,900,000 J-27 DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF Brown and SUPPORT BUILDINGS AT PLANT NO. 2 Caldwell $700,000 J-28 PUMP STATION TELEMETRY AND MONITORING SYSTEM UPGRADE 9-4-92 OCSO $400,000 Domar Elec. $374,100.00 TALL BIOS REJECTEDI J-28 PUMP STATION TELEMETRY AND (Rabid) MONITORINGSYSTEM UPGRADE 1.12.93 OCSD $400,000 Soffe Electric 9312.000.00 2.10.93 J-29 TECHITE PIPE CLAIM (Special Counsel,Investigation and testing) J-30 ADMINISTRATION ANNEX AT PLANT NO. 1 Joint Works- Page 7 B [ B H I [ l l I I I [ fl [ l l I l I 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. J-31 EXPANSION OF EXISTING COMPUTERIZED MONITORING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AT PLANTS 1 AND 2 J-32 FINAL EFFLUENT SAMPLER SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2 5-18-93 Lee&Ro $210,000 Pascal&Ludwig $202,579.00 6.9-93 J-33 STANDBY POWER RELIABILITY AND MODIFICATIONS Carollo J-33-1 J-34 OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES Carollo Joint Works-Page 8 REVISION DATE: W94 PLANT CONTRACTS PLANT NO. 1 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. P14 Primary Sedimentation Basin Additions for Plant No. 1 12-5-56 Carollo Weardo Const. $227,037.37 12-7-56 7-10-57 $296,161.52 Pl-IA Mechanical Clarifier Equipment B-10-58 Carollo Process Engrs. $41,397.00 8-10-56 3-13.57 $41,397.00 Pt-1R-1 and Remodel Sedimentation Basins 3&4, P2-1R-1 Plant 1 and Sedimentation Basins A. B and C. Plant 2 6-8.71 Cerullo d275,000 F.T.2iebarth 6249,700.00 1-28.71 5-10-72 $256,622.50 Pt-2 Digester Addition to Plant No. 1 10-10.58 Carollo 4294,000 F.J.Early Jr. $265,511.00 10.10-58 5.13-59 $269.090.65 P1.3 Headworks Addition to Plant No. 1• 7-14-58 Carols $633,000 F.J.Early Jr.• $815,960.00 7.15-58 5-13.55 $628,286.15 Sewage Pumping Equip.for Plant No. 1•• Firi blinks Morse' Sewage Metering Equip.for Plant No. 1... Foxboro Co. P1.3.1 Odor Control and Improved Influent Screening F..at Rec.Plant No. 1 (Fad.Grant No.C-06-0649) 10-541 Carollo. $115,000 F.T.Zmbeth $108,400.00 10.13-71 7.12.72 $110.105.00 PI-3-2 Hydraulic Reliability Improvements at Rec.Plant No. 1 4-8-80 Lee a& Ro $1,200,000 Equinox-Malibu $1.328,000.00 4.9-80 3-10.82 $1,350,425.98 P1.4 Construction of Office Building Addition,Warehouse Addition, and Monteith& Now Vehicle Storage Building 5.19-61 Strickland 6127,000 Harris& Danner $102,642.00 6.14-61 11-18-61 0104,923.29 P1.5 Digester No. 6 and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1 8-16:61 Cerullo $587,548 D.N.I.Constr. P553,096.50 8-18-61 7.11-62 $559,466.04 PI-6 Electrical Remodeling at Plant No. 1 3-19.62 Carollo 664,300 Steiny/Mitchell 042,600.00 3-28-62 8-8-62 $46,358.00 P1-6.1 Power Reliability at Rec.Rent No. 1 (Fed.Grant No.C-O"649) 7.6-71 Carol. $130,000 Freeman Elec. $155.320.00 7-14-71 2-9.72 $163.298.00 P1.6.1 A 1000 KVA Pad Mount Transformers for Plant No. 1 (Fed.Grant No. General Else. C-05-0649) 1.5-71 Cerullo 885,OW Supply $61,472.25 1.13-71 11.10-71 061,472.25 PLANT 1 - PAGE 1 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. P1-7.1 end Sludge Dewatering Facilities at P2-6.1 Plants I and 2 12.7-62 Carallo $118,000 Bovie&Crail 4106,376.00 12-2.62 5-8.63 4109,383.00 PI-7A Sludge Centrifuge for Plant No. 1 5.11-62 Carollo $44,000 Bird Machine 445,308.00 6-8-62 2-4-63 045,306.00 PI-78 Sludge Centrifuge for Plant No. 1, Unit N2 7-3-63 Carollo $42,000 Bird Machine 042,851.00 7-10-63 12-31-63 442,851.00 PI.7C Motor Control Center for Centrifuges 7.3-63 Carollo $3,500 Grayber Elec. $2,784.08 7-10.63 1-7.64 $2,784.08 P1-7-2 Phase It,Sludge Dewatering Fac. 1-22-64 Carollo $189,000 J. Putnam Haack $182,623.00 2-5-64 11-12-64 $183,026.11 PI-S Engine-Generator No. 1, Plant No. 1 1-463 Carollo $150.000 West&Wiggs 029,899.00 1.7.63 11-13-63 $91,821.88 P1-9 Secondary Treatment, Plant No. 1, Phase 8.23-63 Carollo $2,076,000 J.Putnam Haack $1.784,569.00 9-11-63 10-14.64 $1,813,172.95 P1-9-1 Additional Secondary Treatment at Reclamation Plant No. 1 9-26-72 Carollo $700.000 Hoagland&Hoagland $786,300.00 10.11.72 3.13.74 $825,786.01 1`1-10 Incinerator at Plant No. 1 4-3-63 Carollo 418,000 Smith Engrg. $12,928.00 4-10-63 8-14-63 $12,928.00 PI-11 Primary Clarifier No. 5 11-7-63 Carollo $232,000 Kemper/Hoagland 4216,340.00 11-13-63 6-10-64 $216,982.60 P1-12 Site Improvements at Plant No. 1 9-26-63 OCSD $27,865 R.McClelland $28,240.00 10-9-63 2-13.64 $29,126.20 P1-12-1 Site Improvements at Plant No. 1, Phase ll 10-7-64 OCSD $32,500 R.McCLellend 429,726.60 10.14-64 3-11-65 $32,996.71 P1.12-2 Site Improvements at Plant No. 1, Ph...III 2-1-67 OCSD $25,000 Sully-Miller $17,873.00 2-8.67 4-12-67 $18,768.55 P1.12-3 Fence and Entrance Revisions at Plant No. 1 2.28.67 BIDS REJECTED P1.12.4 Addition to Entrance and Fencing 6-23-70 OCSO $11,938 J.Tiedemann $8,938.00 6-23.70 9-10-70 $8,938.00 P1-12.5 Modifications of Parking Facilities for Administration Building 3-3-71 OCSD $15,000 Sully-Miller 012,577.50 3-10-71 6-9-71 $13.102.60 PIA 2-5A Area Lighting for Administration General Else. Building Perking Facilities 11.8-71 OCSD 42,582 Supply $2,284.80 11-8-71 11-11-71 $2,284.80 PLANT 1 - PAGE 2 [ [ I I l 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. Pt-13 ed P2-10 Grit Hoppers 3.10-65 OCSD 862,000 West&Wiggs $69,969.00 3-10-65 I1-10-65 $74,548.78 P1-14 Digester No.8 at Plant No. 1 5-21-69 Carollo $425,000 Lomar Corp. 6329,400.00 S-27-69 8-12-70 $329,904.43 P1-15 ad P2-15 Digester Solids Dawatering Facilities 3.20-70 Cerullo $825,000 Hood Corp. $767,522.00 4-8-70 8-11-71 $768,666.00 P1-15A and P2-15A Purchase of Centrifuge Equipment 9-10-69 Caro110 $350,000 Bird Machine $336,790.00 9-10-69 12-9-70 $336,790.00 P1-16 46 MGD Activated Sludge Treatment at Roc. Rent No. 1 Donovan Const. IF".Grant No.C-06-0779-010f 4-17-74 Carollo 026.250,000 of Minnesota $29,876,000.00 6.12.74 1.11-78 $30,139,295.69 P1-17 Under-Drain System for Digester Cleaning Reds at Rec. Rent No. 1 5-1-79 OCSD $425,000 Tried Mechanical $487,784.00 5.9-79 12-12-79 $489.958.62 P1-18 Sludge System Improvements at Hoagland/ Reclemab.n Plant No. 1 11-20-80 Lee&go $1,850,000 Artukovich 61,592,000.00 12-10-80 4-1492 61,470,460.00 P7-19 Construction of Bait Filter Press Facility at Rec. Plant No. 1 7-28-81 Montgomery $1.900,000 Waltlingar Corp. 61,847,220.00 8-12-81 12-8-82 $1,947,031.08 PI.19-1 Construction of Containment Facility at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Phase 1 CONSTRUCTION CANCELLED P1-19-2 Construction of Containment Facility at Reclamation Plant No. 1 1.11-83 OCSD $25,000 A.F.Smith 618,942.00 1-12-83 4-13-83 $19,696.18 P1-19-3 Construction of Conuument Facility at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Phase III CONSTRUCTION CANCELLED P1-19-4 Replacement of an Existing 8-inch Plant Water Line with a new 12-inch Ductile Iron Pipe (Purchase Orders) 5.17-83 OCSD None Dorado Ent. 08,464.00 5-11-83 7-28-83 $8,464.00 P1-19-5 Ventilation Improvements at Plant 1 Dawatering Facilities CANCELLED 10-18-94 P1.20 Headworks No. 2 at Plant No, 1 (Includes Job No.P1.31 f 8-4-87 Carollo $33,000,000 Kiewit Pacific 631,458,000 B-12-87 7-11-90 $33,890,078.03 PLANT 1 -PAGE 3 [ I [ a 9 [ [ S a a 1 a A ! a [ l II 1 [ 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMP. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. P7-21 Installation of Replacement Belt Filter Presses at Plant No. 1 5.28-85 Corolla $5,000,000 Margate Const. 64,618,000.00 12-11.85 0.9-88 $4,831,615.18 P1-22 Electrical Reliability,at Plant No. 1 Corolla 04,600,000 Pinner Corot (Withdrew bid) P1-22 Electrical Reliability at Plant (Rebidl No. 1 11.13-85 Corolla $4,600,000 Margate Const. 23,643,600.00 12-11-85 1-29-88 23,948,958.51 PI-22A Prepurchase of Four Generators Power Systems at Plant No. 1 (with Job No.J-6-2A) 10-16-85 Carollo PO Contract Associates $781,126.00 10-16-85 5.31-86 $764,313.85 PI-225 Prepurchase of Six Transformers at Plant No. 1 (with Job No.J-6-281 10-16-85 Corolla PO Contract General Electric $138,883.00 10-16-85 12-9-87 $138,883.00 Pl-22C Prepurchase of Switchgeor at Plant No. 1 (with Job No.J-6-2C) 10-16-85 Carollo PO Contract Westinghouse S612.799.00 10-16.85 12-9-87 $608.674.00 P1.22-1 Power and Communications Service for Support Bldgs.at Roc.Plant No. 1 9.23.86 Carollo 6350,000 Comer Electric 0187,905.00 10-29-86 4-8-87 $187.905.00 PI-23R Replacement of Primary Basins 1 and 2 at Plant No. 1 B-26-86 Lea&Its 113,500,00<) S.A.Healy Co. 84,443,520.70 9-10 86 2.15.89 $5.044,264.40 PI-24R Rehabilitation of Primary Basin. 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1 12-19.85 Lee&Ro $1,900,000 Advanco Const. 92,221,961.00 1.30.88 12.5.86 12,510,625.98 P1-25 Covers for Primary Basins 3,4 and Malcolm 5 at Plant No. 1 8-25-87 Pirnie Advanco Const 2940,001.00 9.9.87 2-10-90 $941,314.39 P1-26 Foul Air Scrubber System at Malcolm Plant No. 1 8.25:87 Pirnie Advanco Const. S1,713,000.00 9-9-87 2-10-90 $1,889.884.74 P7-27 Entrance., Landscaping,Security and Interior Road Improvements at Plant No. l B-16-88 Boyle $1,600,000 Kiewit Pacific $1,590,000.00 10-12-88 11-8-89 21,689,643.73 (Negotiated with Klewit after rejecting the one bid submitted as too high) P1-27-1 Wearohauler Sampling System at Plant No. 1 9.19.89 TOPS 0125,000 Schuler Engrg. $194,344.00 11-8-89 3-13-91 S203,250.OD P1-27-2 Waetahauler Pump Station at Plant No. 1 9-19-89 IWS $140,000 Schuler Engrg. 0979,790.00 11-8-89 3-13-91 $1,016,616.68 P1-27-2-1 Modification of Weateheuler Pump Station PLANT 1 - PAGE 4 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT. P1-28 Advanced Primary Treatment Chemical Addition Facilities Ziebenh and at Plant No. 1 (Bid with P2-36) 9-25-86 OCSD $400,000 Alper 4910,11DO.00 10.29.86 7-14-87 $977,242.00 Pt-29 Repair of Primary Effluent Line at Reclamation Plant No. 1 8-12.86 Lea&go $200,000 Margate Constr. 0156,400.00 8.13-86 10-31-86 $168,867.00 PI.30 Miscellaneous Peeing at Reclamation Plant No. 1 (Replaces PW-1511 12.2-86 OCSD 8601000 R.J. Noble $43,440.10 12-10.86 2.18-87 $53,933.88 P1-31 Otunditien of Digesters 1, 2 end 4; Replacement of Roger,Piping Cleanouta;and Grading and Paving at Plant No. 1 (Combined with Job No.P1-20 for construction) P1-32 Modification.and Improvement of IW Field Office,Rent No. 1 PO OCSD (Force Account Work) P1-33 Primary Clarifiers Noe.6.15 and Related Facilities at Reclamation Plant No. 1 9.19-89 Lee&Re 646,000,000 Gust Newberg 839,657,000.00 10.11-89 6-10-92 $42,280,663.33 Pl-33-1 Stiffeners for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 Effluent Launder. 12-29-92 OCSD 8125,0DD S.S. Mechanical $39,572.00 1.13-93 7.14-93 $39,572.00 PI-34 Digesters Nos. 11-16,Sludge and Gee Handling Facilities at Reclamation Rant No. i Design Only Carollo P1-34.1 Gas Handling Facilities at Plant No. 1 12-19-89 Carollo $16,000.000 Ziebanh&Alper $13,098,000.00 1-10-90 9-12.92 $13.689,820.70 P1-34.2 Sludge Handling Facilities at Plant No. 1 5.23.89 Carollo 622,400,000 Advanco 819,085,600.00 7.12.89 11.13-91 $20,150,573.85 PI.34-3 Construction of Digester.Nos. 11-16 at Rae.Plant No. 1 (combined with P1-35.2 and J-21 for construction) 11.6.90 Carollo $30,000,000 Advance $23,225,376.00 12.12.90 1-13.93 $24,387,300.54 P1-35 Rehabilitation of Digesters 7,8,9 Brown and and 10 at Rae.Plant No. I Design Only Caldwell PLANT 1 -PAGE 5 i [ � e x � t � ► l [ c l t t e I e � t a e � fi 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMf. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT. P1-35-1 Rehabilitation of Digester.7 and 8 Brown and at Rec.Plant No. 1 2-21-89 Caldwell 81,e00,000 S.A.Healy $2,530,072,00 3-8-89 a-8-90 $2,411,915.00 PI.35-1-1 Cleaning of Digesters 7 and 8 at Brown and Rec. Plant No. 1 8-20-89 Caldwell 9250,000 Dorado Ent. $171,000.00 7-12-89 10.11-89 $171,000.00 P1-35.2 Rehabilitation of Digester.9 and Brown and 10 at Rec.Plant No. 1 11-8.90 Caldwell Advanco $3,180,000 12.12-90 1-13.93 $3,433,313.00 (bid with PI-34-3 AND J-21) PI.36 Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 (Prime Number) Carollo P1-38-1 Electrification of Pump Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 2 Corolla Advanco $1,200,001.00 12-8-93 (bid with PI.38-1, PI-38.4 and P2.43.2) (plus 857,500 for rock lin and outl and insurance) P1-38-2 Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 2 Corolla PI-37 Primary Clarifiers Noe. 18-21 and Brown and Related Facilities Caldwell PI.38 Miscellaneous Improvements to Fecilid..at Plant No. 1 Design Only Carollo PI-38-1 Security and Landscaping Element of Misc.Improvements to Fec. at Plant No. 1 Ibid with PI-36-1,PI-38-4 and P2.43-2 Carollo Adyando $1,020,000.00 12-8-93 P1.38.2 Priority Projects Element of Misc. Improvements to Fec.at Plant No. 1 5.18.93 Lee and Ro $5.000.000 Pascal& Ludwig 93,384,800.00 6.9.93 PI-38-3 Seismic Study Element of Misc. Dame.and Improvement.to Fec.at Plant No. 1 Moore PI-38.4 Misc.Improvements to Fac.at Plant No. 1 (bid with Pt-384,PI-38-1 and P2-43-2) Carollo Advanco $1,684,551.00 12-8.93 P1-38.5 Process Ara.Fire Protection and Signage and Water Distribution System Modification. Ide.lgned with Job No.P2-48) Lee and R. PLANT I -PAGE 6 1 a E a [ I I i & L a i 1 a 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. P1.39 Drainage Improvements at Plant 1 (Force Account Work) PI-40 Facility and Utility Improvements at Plant No. 1 PI-40-1 Modifications to Electrical and Control Systems,and Process Evaluation.at Plant No. 1 Pt-40-2 Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrade.at Plant No. 1 Lea and Be P1.41 Rehabilitation of Clarifier.3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1 Carollo PI-42 Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1 5-19.93 OCSD 1260.000 Pascal & Ludwig $235,900.00 6-9-93 P1-43 Seismic Retrofit of Non-Stmoturel Systems at Plant No. 1 PI-44 Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1 Holmes and Narver P1-45 Recycled Water Treatment and Distribution at Plant No. 1 P1-46 Chemical and Wasteheuler Facility Black and Modifications at Plant No. 1 Veatch PI-46.1 Plus..I Wasteheuler Dumping Facilities Black and Modifications Veatch 5200,000 Dorado Enterprises $248,953.00 11-10-93 P1-47 12 KV Distribution System for Support Facilities P1-48 Miscellaneous Treatment Plant Improvements at Plant No. 1 PI-49 Operation.and Maintenance Projects PLANT 1 - PAGE 7 1 l [ [ [ [ I [ I [ [ [ I [ [ l [ 1 1 REVISION DATE: 3/94 PLANT CONTRACTS PLANT NO,2 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. P2-1 Construction of Sewage Treatment Plant 6-24-53 Carollo Early& Kiewit $874,875.00 7-22-53 5-26-54 $891,443.30 P2.2 Expansion of Plant No. 2 11-20.69 Carollo F.J.Early $864,515.00 12.9.59 7-26-60 $867,702.10 P2-2A 250 HP Horizontal Motor and Starter 12-3-64 Corolla $8,000 Graybar Else. $5,699.20 12-9-64 3-5-65 $5.699.20 P2-3 and Kemper and J-4 Expansion of Plant No.2 8-2460 Corolla $553,000 Hoaglandfndley 0993,470.74 8-26-60 5-12-62 $1,018.279.20 P2-4 Steam Station Tunnels, Incineration and Misc. Improvements at Plant No. 2 1.17-62 Corolla $329,295 W.wdo Const. 0335,045.00 1-29-62 10-10-62 $355,SU6.05 P2-5 Haadworks No. 2,Sedimentation Basins F and G and Digesters F,G and H 8-17-62 Carollo $1.773,000 Hoagland/Findlay $1,357.000.00 8-22-62 10.9-63 $1,358,701.53 P2-SA Two 200 HP Vertical Elea. Motors 1-8.62 Cerollo Fairbanks Morse $12.499.05 1-10-62 46-62 $12,499.05 P2-5B Engine Drive Unit 5.11.62 Carollo $30,000 Waukesha Motors $21.474.00 5-25-62 8-14-63 $21,474.00 P2-5C Raw Sewage Pumps and Gear Reduction Units 8.17-62 Carollo $35.000 Worthington $34.194.00 8-22-62 45-63 $34.194.00 P2.5D Clarifier Equipment for Plant No.2 5-11-62 Carollo $50,000 Process Engrg. $33,624.12 5-25-62 8-14-63 $33,624.12 P2-SE Headworks Motor,Pump.Gearhead end Starter 2-10-65 Carollo 631.000 Worthington $37,797.00 2-17-65 11-15-65 $37,797.00 P2-SR-1 Rehabilitation of Headwork.B at Plant No. 2 8-14-70 Carollo $25,000 J&W Hoagland $33,220.00 8-17-70 3-10-71 $38,849.66 P2-SR-2 Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation Basins F and G at Plant No.2 9-25-84 Lee and R. $980,000 Advance Constr. $783,464.00 10.10-84 6-11-86 $909,708.86 P2-6-1 and Sludge Dewalering Facilities at PI-7-1 Plants Nos. 1 en! 2 12-7.62 Corolla $1113,000 Boo.&Crail $106,376.00 12-12-62 5-10-63 $109.383.00 P2-7 Turbine Generator Installation and Building 3-10-64 Cerollo 0116,000 F.J. Early $232,250.00 3-11-64 1-13.65 $237,228.95 PLANT 2-PAGE 1 l ! [ [ [ [ It [ [ [ It [ [ [ l [ It [ 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMf. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. P2.7A Turbine Generator Set No. 1 10-16-63 Carollo $255,000 Orenda, Inc. $230,373.00 1G-30-63 8-10-67 $221,512.52 P2.713 Steam Turbine Generator 6-3-64 Carollo $19,000 Deem-HilllPetemon- $16.943.00 6-10-64 412-65 $16.943.00 Boston P2.7.1 Installation of Steam Turbine 11.5.64 Carollo $22.000 J.WaW Co. $28.738.00 11-12.64 6-9-65 $30.170.32 P2-8-1 Enclosures—Outfall Booster No. 1 11-3-55 Carollo $302.000 J Putnam Henck $307,203.00 11-10-65 10-13-66 $308,664.01 P2-8-2 Site Improvements.-Ph...II 2.28-67 OCSD $8,500 R.J.Noble $7,680.30 3-1-67 4-12.67 $8,055.69 P2-8-3 Enclosures--Phase II and Operator's Building 12-10-68 Carollo $186,500 W.J. Burke $216,585.00 12-18-68 10-8-69 $218,408.80 P2-8-4 Site Improvements—Phase lit 11-24.69 OCSD $7,000 Griffith Co. $8,869.00 11-25.69 14470 $8,961.00 P2.8.5 Site Improvement—Phase IV 5-26-70 OCSD 025,000 KellµCorkell $16.849.00 5-13-70 7-8-70 $17.589.00 P2.8.6 Entry Well,Gates and Sign 6.19-70 Ficker $12,000 Neer-Cel $18,921.00 6-19-70 9-29-70 $18,921.00 P2-8-7 Plant No.2 Entry and Street Paving 6.19-70 OCSO $31,000 Sully-Miller $29,963.00 6.22-70 9-10-70 132,955.00 P2-8-8 Smokhurst Street Improvements 4-8-76 Forkert 0214,955 Fleming Constr. $141,441.10 4-14-76 8-11-76 $165.633.81 P2-8-9 Preparation of Grading and Drainage Plan for Northerly Portion of Treatment Plant No. 2 7.28.81 OCSD Forks"Engr. $14,000.00 10.14.81 4.14-82 $13,825.47 P2-9 Incinerator No. 2 10.16-63 Carollo $28.000 Dunnell Constr. $14,895.00 10.30.63 3.11.64 $14,895.00 P2.10 and PI.13 Grit Hoppers(a..Page I- West 6 Wiggs P2-11 Headwork.•C"--Plant 2 3.1.67 Carollo $2,475,OD0 J.Putnam Henck $2,495,961.00 3.8-67 12.10.69 $2,499.528.37 P2.11.1 Heedworks'C" Expansion at Plant No.2(Fed.Grant C-06.0573) 9.1.71 Carollo $1,200,000 ETI/Kordick $1.228,000.00 4.10-74 $1,277,256.00 P2-12 Clarifier•H., 5-4-66 Carollo $328,000 J.Putnam Henck $247.518.00 5-11-66 4-12-67 $249.784.18 P2-13 and Bypass Facilities and Sedimentation 1.7.1 Basin Effluent Facilities (Sae Job No.1.7.1) PLANT 2-PAGE 2 l t [ l [ t l [ 1 l l [ t [ l l [ [ [ 3M4 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. P2-14 Sedimentation Basin-I',Digester'(' and Distribution Structure'B'at Plant No. 2 4-30-69 Carollo $875,000 J&W Hoagland 0716.900.00 5-14-69 9-10-70 $721,550.93 P2-15 Digester Solid. Deweter ng Facilities at Plant No.2, Phase II (Be.Job No.P1-15) P2.15-1 Installation of Centrifuge at Treatment _ Plant No.2 9.12-78 Carollo $150,000 All Bide Rejected 9-13-78—to be Rabid P2.15-1 Installation of New Centrifuge at (REBID) Treatment Plant No.2 11-30-78 OCSD $150,000 All Bide Rejected 1-1-79—included in Job No.P2.24 P2-15-IA Electric Motor for New Bird HB-64,000 Centrifuge(See E-0881 3.30-78 OCSD 615,000 No Bide Received—GM negotiated NTE$14,000 contract with Bird Machinery P2-16 Sedimentation Basin"J", Digester*J' at Plant No. 2 3.6.70 Carolo $650,G00 J&W Hoagland $587.700.00 3-11-69 4-14-71 $600,019.10 P2.17 Sedimentation Basin'K' and Digester"It" at Plant No.2(Fed.Grant C-06-0573) 2-17.71 Curcio $1,200,000 J.Putnam Hanck $1,164,S40.00 2-23-71 9-13.72 $1,199,440.00 P2-18 Effluent Screening Fee.at Plant No. 2 11.9-70 Carollo $70,000 Lynam-Wood $69,299.00 11.12.70 7-14.71 $69,299.00 P2-19 Sedimentation Basins'L"and 'M'and Digesters"L"and 'M' at Plant No. 2 (Fed.Grant C-06-05731 5.18-71 Carollo $1,700,000 J&W Hoagland $1,383.000.00 6-9-71 9-13-72 $1,455,644.00 P2.20 Power Reliability Project at Plant No. 2 (Fed.Grant C-06-0649) 6-15-72 Carollo $350.000 Gorham Elec. $158,294.00 8-9-72 6-11-75 $155.663.75 P2-21 Digester.'N" and"0" at Plant No. 2 (Fad.Grant C-06-0649) 11-20-72 Carollo $1,200,000 Hemisphere $1,068.413.00 12.13.72 10-18-74 $1,077,375.00 P2-23.1 75 MGO Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2, Flood Wall and Site Carollo/ Development(Fed Grant Greeley and C-06-1073.1101 3-24-77 Hansen $2,560,000 Pascal& Ludwig $2,268,420.00 5.3.77 5-10.79 $2.279,868.09 PLANT 2-PAGE 3 L I [ [ [ [ [ [ I I I L I H [ [ [ [ I 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. P2-23-2 Div. I Oxygen Generation and Storage Facilities Div.-2: Oxygen Dissolution Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2(Fed.Grant Catalytic Inc. C-06.1073-130-1) 7-28-77 Carollo $11,550,000 (Air Products) $8,273,000.00 9-22-77 5-13-81 $8.521,476.49 P2.23-3 Electrical Reliability for 75 MGD Improved Treatment in Plant No. 2 (Fed.Grant C-06.1073-120) 5-10-77 Carollo $4,150,000 C.H.Leavell $2,999.000.00 6-8-77 5-9-79 $3,024,195.76 P2-23.5 Operations Center for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 (Fed.Grant C-06-1073-110) 5-10-77 Carollo $1.150,000 Pascal&Ludwig $1,149,296.00 6-e-77 3-14-79 $1,251,970.35 P2-23-5.1 Operations Center Expansion at Brown and Plant No.2 Caldwell P2.23-5-1 Operations Center Expansion at Brown and (Rebid No. 2) Plant No. 2 1.19.93 Caldwell $2,800,000 Jeveid Contractors $2,284,864.00 2-10-93 P2.23-6 Major Facilities for 75 MGD Improved Treatment at Plant No. 2 H.C.Smith (Operational) (Fed.Grant C-06.1073-1401 10.20.77 Carollo $40,000,000 (Owl Constr.) $30,670,000.00 12-14-77 1-12-83 $32.566,756.64 P2-23-8-R1 Additional Waste Activated Sludge Line Supports, Plant No. 2 1.10-83 OCSD Advance $13,465.00 1-12-83 3-9-83 $13.465.00 P2-24-1 Digestion end Wet Storage Facilities for Solids Handling and Dewetering Facilities at Plant No. 2 IFed.Grant C-06-1073-310) 11-20-79 Carollo $12,657,000 C. N.Peterson $13,350,000.00 12-12-79 7-14-82 $14,178.837.00 P2-24-IA Solids Transport and Processing Equipment for Solids Handling and Dewatedng Facilitites at Plant No. 2 (Fed.Grant C-06-1073-320) Schedule A: 4,000 Gallon Water Truck 11.6-79 Carollo $45.000 Paramount Equip. $61,967.00 12-12-79 10-8-80 $61,867.00 Schedule S: Nine 3-axle Trucks 11-6.79 Carollo $405.000 Mack Trucks $453,995.24 12-12-79 10-8-80 $453,995.24 PLANT 2-PAGE 4 [ 1 I 1 [ 1 l [ [ t t l [ [ [ [ [ [ 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. P2-24-1 B Solids Transport and Processing Equipment for Solids Handling and Dswetering Facilities at Plant No. 2 (Fad. Grant C-06-1073-3201 Eight End-Dump Trailers 11-6-79 Carollo $240.000 Fruehauf Div. $278,076.16 12.12-79 10-8-80 $278,076.16 P2-24-IC Solids Transport and Processing Equipment for Solids Handling and Dowatering Facilities at Plant No. 2 (Fed.Grant C-06-1073-320) Schedule A: Composting Machine 11.6.79 Carollo $230,000 Eagle Crusher $178,118.80 12-12-79 10.9.80 $168,980.00 Schedule B: Elevating Scraper 11-6.79 Carollo $108.000 Shepherd Machinery $89.068.62 12-12.79 10-8-80 $89,068.62 Schedule C: Motor Grader 11-6-79 Carollo $110,000 Milo Equipment $89,768.22 12-12-79 10 8-80 $89.768.22 Schedule D: Front Loader Tractor 11.6.79 Carollo $135,000 Milo Equipment $111.286.22 12-12.79 10-8.80 0111,286.22 P2.42-2 Solids Handling Dowetedng and Dry Storage Facilities at Treatment Plant No.2 (Fed.Grant C-06.1073-3301 7-29.80 Carollo $13,600,000 C.N.Paterson $15,045,000.00 8.13.80 a-12-82 $16,117,778.00 P2-25-1 A Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant Hoagland/ No. 2(Basins) 10.27-81 Carollo $5.000.000 Anukovich $3.512,000.00 11.11-81 a-10.83 $4,023.629.00 P2.25-1 B Flow Equalization Facilities at Plant No. 2 008-inch effluent line) 9-8-81 Carollo $500.000 J.Anukovich $343,000.00 9-9.81 5.12-82 $428,163.47 P2-25-2 Hydraulic Reliability Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 6-7-83 Carollo $4,300,000 Advance $3,210,000.00 7.13.83 4-10-85 $3,303.864.73 P2-26 Primary Sedimentation Basins"P' and 'O' at Plant No. 2 7.26-83 Carollo $3.500,000 Pascal&Ludwig $2,174.300.00 8.10.83 2-1386 $2,227.343.00 P2-27 Foul Air Scrubbers for Influent Interceptors at Plant No. 2 11-23-82 Carollo $748,000 Advanco $710,436.00 12-8-82 2.2-84 $752.283.00 P2.28-1 Installation of Replacement Belt Kiswit PopiOc/ 62,960.000 Iwithdrew bid 12-31-85) Filter Presses at Plant No. 2 12.31-85 Carollo $4.500,000 Lebanh&Alper $3,747.747.00 1.9-86 9-21-87 03,897,468.20 P2-28.3 Ventilation Improvements at Plant No. 2 Solids Handling 10-30-84 Carollo 6300,000 Dean Chilton $384,900.00 11-14-84 2-13.86 $478,065.00 PLANT 2-PAGE 5 I [ a a a a a a [ 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. P2.29 Rehabilitation of Primary Sedimentation Basins"D' and"E"at Plant No.2 7-30-85 Lea&go 81,250,400 Advenco $944,383.00 8-14-86 9-10-86 $1,042,824.56 P2-30 Rehabilitation of Digesters "E"and Kennedy/ 'H' at Plant No.2 9-23-86 Janke 41,600,000 2iebarth&Alper 01,374,800.00 10-29-86 12-1-87 $1,862.644.86 P2-31 R Rehabilitation of Primary Baeine"A', 'B', 'C', 'H', "I', "J", 'K', 'L"and*M" Morley,2iebarth at Plant No.2 5-28-86 Lae& R. $4,000,000 and Alper,JV 92,433,500.00 6-11-as 7-26-87 $2,701.504.00 P2-32 Coven for Primary Basins, Plant No. 2 8-25-87 M.Pirnis Advance $5,100,000.00 9.9-87 2-10-90 $5,061,721.23 P2.33 Foul Air Scrubber Systembs at Plant No. 2 8-25-87 M.Pinde Advance $5,965.000.00 9.9-87 2.10.90 $6.794,979.89 P2-34 Improvements to Grit Facility"B", Billings Tunnel and Distribution Structure'A" 8.26-87 M.Pirnia Advenco $1,722,000.00 9-9-87 2-10-90 $5,848,675.58 P2-35 Support Facilities Site and Security Improvement.at Plant No. 2 Pulaski& fMester Plan--Prime Numbed Adte P2.35-1 Phase l lmp,.v.rmnta 44.88 P&A $1,200,000 Valley Crest 01,098,295.38 5.11-88 3-1-89 01,013,334.32 Landscaping P2-35.2 Warehouse Building at Plant No. 2 Brown and Caldwell P2.35.3 Maintenance Building at Plant No.2 Brown and Caldwell 1`2-35-4 Construction Management Offfice at Brown and Plant No. 2 Caldwell P2.35.5 Phase II Site and Security Improvements Brown and at Plant No. 2 Caldwell P2-36 Advanced Primary Treatment Chemical Addition Facilities at Plant No. 2 7-29-85 OCSD 44001000 2iebarth&Alper 8910,000.00 9.25-86 7-14-87 $977,242.00 PLANT 2-PAGE 6 l I I I I I 1 1 I [ t [ I 1 I I I 1 1 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT. P2.37 Miscellaneous Modifications and Improvements to Facilities at Rent Brown and No.2 9-27-88 Caldwell $7,500,000 Zlebanh&Alper $5,395,000.00 10-12.88 11-14.90 05,997,966.29 P2-38 Remodel Lobby of Control Center at Plant No.2 OCSD Force Account Work P2-39 Rehabilitation of Digesters I,J, K, L, M Brown and N and O at Treatment Rent No. 2 Caldwell P2-40 Instrumentation Improvements at Plant No.2 4-18-89 LIMA Ent, $100,000 Fleming Engrg. (Asked to be relieved of bid.-will be rebid) P2-40 Instrumentation Improvements at Plant (REBID) No. 2(combined with R-033-1/-2 and P1-27.1/.21 9-19-89 UMA $100,000 Schuler Engrg. $164,143.00 11-8-89 3-13-91 $164,143.00 P2-41 Primary Clarifiers R, S,T. U and Related Facilities at Plant No.2 P2-42 Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2 (Prime Number) Design Cerollo P2-42.1 Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No.2 Cerollo $16,000,000 Zieberth&Alper $9,369.000 1-9-91 P2-42-2 Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No.2 3-23-93 Cerollo $22.000.000 Mergers Conti. $14,496,000 4-14-93 P2-43 Miscellaneous Improvements to Fec. at Plant No. 2(Prime Number) Design Cerollo P2.43-1 Priority Projects Element of Misc. Improvements to Fac.at Plant No. 2 3.23-93 Carollo 64,800,000 Pascal&Ludwig $3,398,000 414-93 P2-43-2 Seismic Study Element of Misc. Dames& Improvements to Fec.at Plant No.2 Moore (Renumbered P2-53) P2.43-3 Miscallaneouc Improvements to Facilities at Plant No.2 Corolla PLANT 2-PAGE 7 [ [ I I t I t I I I t l I I t I t t t 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMP. P2-44 Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No.2 HIEO (Combined with J-23-2 for coat,.) 5-21-91 EMA $3,000,000 Technology $1,957,000.00 7-17-91 P2-45 Abandonment and Removal of Oil Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2 P2-45-1 Abandon Kimdw Oil Feld Lees. (Abandoned by Laws.) P2-45-2 Abandon D.W.Elliot Oil Feld Leese (Abandoned by L....a) P2-46 Process Area Fire Protection and Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications Lee and R. $4,350,000 P2.47 Facility and Utility Improvements at Plant No. 2(Prima Number) P2.47.1 Modification.to Electrical end Control systems and Process Evaluation at Plant No.2 P2-47-2 Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2 Lae and Be P2-48 Rehabilitation of Clarifiers D through 0 at Rent No.2 P2-49 Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2 P2-50 Seismic Retrofit of Non-Structural Systems at Rent No. 2 P2-51 Industrial Water Pipeline Extension at Plant No. 2 7-13-93 Lee and Ro 5300,000 Amick Const. 9275,000 8-11-93 P2.52 P2.53 Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2 Holmes and Newer P2-53-1 Seismic Retrofit of Bend C Headwork. PLANT 2- PAGE 8 [ I [ I [ I [ 1 ( 1 I - [ l A ( [ [ [ [ W94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTflACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE COW.AMf. P2-54 Recycled Water Treatment and Distribution at Plant No.2 P2-55 Chemical and Plant Water Facility Black and MadiSoations Veatch P2-59 Miacellanaous Seismic Modifications and Rare Improvements at Plant No. 2 P2-57 Operations and Maintenance Projects PLANT 2-PAGE 9 [ l 1 1 [ [ [ I [ [ I ' I 1 I [ 1 [ I I REVISION DATE: 3/90 PLANT CONTRACTS PLANT NO,3 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. P3 WATER RECLAMATION PLANT NO.3 (Prime Number) PLANT 3-PAGE 1 [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ t [ [ [ [ [ [ I . [ : [ REVISION DATE: 3/94 PLANT CONTRACTS INTERPLANT PROJECTS FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 1-1 Ellis Avenue Trunk 4-22-53 Cerullo — J/N Adukovich $190,031.25 429.53 10.28.53 $189,249.00 1.1 R Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Pump Station 3.30-78 Montgomery $305,099 Tried Mechanical $371,173.00 4-12-78 7-11-79 $390,564.00 I-1R-1 Rehabilitation of Ellis Avenue Force Main 2.23-82 OCSD $950,000 Advance $533,323.00 3-10-82 11-10-82 6562.279.49 1-2 Bushard and Treatment Plant Trunk Sewer. 4-22-53 OCSD — J/N Artukovich 5889,999.50 429-53 2-2454 $890.357.10 1-2R-1 Rehabilitation of Bushard Trunk, Adams Avenue to Ellis Avenue, Phase 5-24-83 Hedge $587.000 George Miller $676,596.00 6-8-83 12-1483 $724,227.41 1-211.2 and Rehabilitation of Bushard Street Trunk 1-211-3 Phase 11, Adam.St.to Hamilton Ave. (1-2R-21 and Phase 111,Hamilton Ave. to'C' Headworks at Plant No. 2 (1-211-3) 2-28-84 Hedge $1,300,000 Sancon $942.496.00 3-14-84 11-1"4 $869,189.67 1-2R.2A Supplemental Repair of Gushers!Trunk. Phase ll 10-30.84 Hodge $150.000 Thibodo Const. $220,000.00 11-14-84 4-10-85 $230,874.30 14 Effluent Discharge Facilities between Plants Nos. 1 and 2 12-10-57 Cerullo $1,001,000 Webb&White $878,427.00 12-11-57 8-13-58 $877,927.00 I-4 Interplant Gas Transmission Line 3-9.W Cerollo $41.400 Pacific Pipe $33,900.00 3-26.60 5-11-60 $32.923.75 I-4-R Replacement of Interplant Gas Line 6-4-74 OCSD $150,000 Pacific Engrs. $98,161.70 6-12-74 9.11-74 $102.887.76 1.4.1 Ga.Storage Facilities 2-5-64 Cerollo $71,000 Pittsburgh-Des $54,290.00 2-13-64 7-8-64 $54.290.00 Moines Steel 1-4-1R Replacement of Gas Storage Facilities atTreatment Plant.Nos. 1 and 2 10-5-76 OCSD $500,000 Pittaburgh-Des Moines Steel $459,390.00 10-29-76 7-13-77 $460,902.66 I-4-2 Installation of Additional Compressors 4.6-66 Cerullo $175,000 Kemper/Hoagland $148,400.00 4-13.66 2-8-67 $149,825.60 Interplant-Page 1 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMP. 1.4-2A Digester Go.Compressors and Stoner 12-1-65 Carollo $75,000 Am.Compressor $69,612.40 12-8-65 5-6-66 $69,612.40 1-4-28 Digester Gas Compressor. 7.7-69 OCSD Nona Gas Pro.....re $20,882.40 7-9-67 7-6-70 $20,882.40 1.43 Installation of Gas Motoring Equipment 1-5 Tranmission and Control Line 8-16-61 Carollo $29,700 Shurr/Rnlay $33.985.00 8.18.61 12-13-61 $37,295.68 1-5-A Additional Supervisory Control Cable 5-1-63 Carollo $19,500 Ans..W.Wire $12,556.00 5-8-63 12-6-63 $12,558.00 1.5-1 Relocation of 12 KV and Control Line. 1-6-65 Carollo $40,000 ShurrfRnlay $47,224.00 1.13-65 413-66 $59,735.79 1-5-2 Control Cable 9.1-65 Carollo $62,500 Shurr/Finlay $44,021.00 9.8.65 4�13.66 $44,021.00 1-6-1 Addition to Plant No. 1 Effluent Discharge Facilities Pipeline 2-10-GS Carollo $1,590.000 Vinnell Corp. $1,455,850.00 2-17.65 1.12-66 1,513,651.89 1-6.2 Addition to Plant No. I Effluent Discharge Facilities-Structures e-2-65 Carollo 0173,000 Virmell Corp. $172,800.00 6-9-65 3-9.66 $174,698.22 1.7.1 and P2-13 Bypass Facilities and Sedimentation Basin Effluent Facilities 10-31-68 Carollo $235.000 P.Vukich $217,447.82 11-13-68 10-8-69 $218,179.32 1.7-2 Plant No. 1 Bypass Facilities at Plant No. 1 1.21.69 Carollo $140,000 W. Hoagland $121,350.00 1-28-69 12-10-69 $123,756.54 1-7-3 Pump Station and Addition.to Bypass Facilities at Plant No. 1 6.16.71 Carallo 0165,000 H.Tibbit. $142,478.00 6.29.71 5-10-72 $153,683.48 1.8 Interplant Influent Trunk Carollo& 1Fed Grant No.C-06.05731 8-24-71 Keith $7,505,499 Kordick/Radoe $6,387,511.00 9.30-71 1.10-73 $6,469,092.04 1-BR-1 Manhole Repair,Inteplant Influent Interceptor 5-17-83 OCSD $14,000 Sancon Engrg. $14,000.00 6.8-83 9-14-83 $16,020.00 Interplant-Page 2 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TRLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 1-8-3 Influent Metering and Divmelun Structure at Roe.Plant No. 1 (Fed.Grant No.C-06-06491 8-17-72 Cerogo 41,490,000 ETIMordick $1,290.000.00 9.13-72 249-75 91,511,457.75 1-9 Interplant Pipeline and Undlity Corridor (Combined with J-22-2 for consl.) 7-2-91 Cerollo $44,200,000 Colich&Sons 020,008,600.00 7-17-91 12-8-93 1120,417,092.00 Interplant-Page 3 REVISION DATE: 3194 DISTRICT CONTRACTS PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS 'PW' CONTRACTS CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT. PW-001 SANDBLASTING &COATING MECHANICAL CLARIFIER EQUIPMENT AT PLANT NO. 1 5-5-61 E.Wagachall $27,000.00 PW-002 VOID PW-003 VERTICAL LIFT DOORS AT JOINT CHLORINATION STATION 10.26.61 Ferguson Door $9,340.00 PW-004 PERIMETER FENCE AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 1 10-26.61 Cyclone Fenc $ 9,959.40 PW-005 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 1 11.22.61 BoacK Paving $ 2.400.00 PW-006 SLUDGE LINE ADDITION TO TREATMENT PLANT NO. 11-25.62 Fewall Cone. $ 2,377.13 PW-007 REPAIR OF DIGESTER 'A' DOME 1-25-62 JohnsoMWestern $10,339.00 PW-008 SANDBLASTING OF DIGESTER 'C' DOME AT TREATMENT Td-County PLANT NO.2 4.27-62 - Sandblasting $1,775.00 PW-009 DIRT FILL AT PLANT NO. 2 4-27-62 Bey Sierra $0.75& $ .85 PW-010 ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING ADDITIONS 5.24-62 Sully-Miller $ 9,200.00 PW-Ol l PERIMETER FENCE AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 8-31-82 Cyclone Fence $ 7,569.00 PW-012 PAVING AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE WESTSIDE PUMPING STATION Stanford $1.941.50 PW-1 H I I I H 1 3/94 CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE 810 DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT. PW-013 NORTH&WEST PERIMETER FENCE AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 1 8-30-63 Crown Fence $5.850.50 PW-014 ADDITIONAL PAVING AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 11-7.63 R.W.McClellan $35,765.00 PW-Ole GRAVEL ROADWAY-HEADWORKS 'C' AT PLANT NO. 2 2-11-69 SuIIY-Miller 9 3,780.00 PW-020 DIGESTER AND SURGE TOWER SANDBLASTING AND EPDXY COATING 5.5-65 Welker Coaling 8 3,676.00 PW-021 TERN SACTUARY ENCLOSURE 2.25-66 Crown Fence $1,779.00 PW-022 ASPHALT PAVING SEAL COAT AT PLANT NO. 1 & 2 - 1970 8.28.70 Stanford Trk 4 5,670.00 PW-023 PLANT NO.2 BOILER REPAIRS 7.10-72 Porter Boiler 9 5,192.00 PW-024 CONTROL CENTER REPLACEMENT Tardiff Sheet AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM 8.22.72 Metal/Air Con $5,695.00 PW-025 REWIND TWO 1000 KVA TRANSFORMERS 3-7-73 Adva..a Elea. 8 5,940.90 PW-026 CHAIN LINK SECURITY FENCES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 AND TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 4-24-73 Guardian Fence $17,238.00 PW-027 ODOR CONTROL SPRAYS AT PLANT NO. 2 424.73 Diet Force. $22,000.00 PW-028 REBUILD NO. 4 ENGINE AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 4.24.73 Diet Force. 8 8,500.00 PW-029 REBUILD NO.9 ENGINE AT PLANT NO. 2 4-24.73 Diet Force. 313,000.00 PW-030 REBUILD NO.4 BOOSTER ENGINE AT PLANT NO.2 5.28.73 Diet Forces 513,800.00 PW-2 [ t [ [ [ [ , t It [ [ I [ [ It [ t [ [ [ 3194 CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT. PW-013 NORTH&WEST PERIMETER FENCE AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 1 8-3043 Crown Fence $5.850.50 PW-014 ADDITIONAL PAVING AT TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 11-7-63 R.W.McClellan $35.765.00 PW-016 GRAVEL ROADWAY-HEADWORKS 'C' AT PLANT NO.2 2-11.69 Sully-Miller $ 3,780.00 PW-020 DIGESTER AND SURGE TOWER SANDBLASTING AND EPDXY COATING 5-5-65 Welker Coating $3.676.00 PW-021 TERN SACTUARY ENCLOSURE 2-25-66 Crown Fence $1,779.00 PW-022 ASPHALT PAVING SEAL COAT AT PLANT NO. 1 & 2 - 1970 8-28-70 Stanford Trk S 5,670.G0 PW-023 PLANT NO. 2 BOILER REPAIRS 7-10-72 Porter Boiler $ 5,192.00 PW-024 CONTROL CENTER REPLACEMENT Tardiff Sheet AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM 8-22-72 - Metal/Air Con $5,695.00 PW-025 REWIND TWO 1000 KVA TRANSFORMERS 3-7-73 Advance Else. It 5,940.90 PW-026 CHAIN LINK SECURITY FENCES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 _ AND TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 4.24.73 Guardian Fence 017,238.00 PW-027 ODOR CONTROL SPRAYS AT PLANT NO.2 4-24.73 Dist Forces $22,000.00 PW-029 REBUILD NO.4 ENGINE AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 4-24.73 Dist Forces $ 8,500.00 PW-029 REBUILD NO.9 ENGINE AT PLANT NO. 2 424-73 Dist Force. $13.000.00 PW-030 REBUILD NO.4 BOOSTER ENGINE AT PLANT NO. 2 6.28-73 Dist Forces $13,800.00 PW-2 3/94 CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. PW-031 REBUILD NO. 1 ENGINE AT PLANT NO. 1 9.5.73 Diet Forces 9 7,1 WOO PW-032 RESOURCES MANAGEMENT CENTER AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 11-7-73 OCSD 430,000 B&J Constr. 4 30,895.00 11-14.73 1.3.74 $ 30,895.00 PW-033 MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT TREATMENT PLT NO. 2 12-8.73 OCSD Sully-Miller 015,522.00 12-12-73 5-24.74 $15,552.20 PW-034 VEHICLE FUELING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 12.6.73 Joe Key Daei9n $6,852.00 12-12-73 410.74 $5,650.00 PW-036 ADDITIONAL BOILER FACILITIES AT PLT NO. 2 2.11.74 OCSD $50,000 Porter Bailer $35,673.00 2-13-74 6-11-75 $39,047.76 PW-038 REPAIR OF TWO GAS SPHERES AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2 2-11-74 NO BIDS RECEIVED-GENERAL MANAGER AUTHORIZED TO APPROVE A PURCHASE ORDER is-12.74) PW-037 REPLACEMENT OF GRIT AUGERS AT PLANT NO. 1 &4.74 ALL BIDS REJECTED-WORK COMPLETED BY FORCE ACCOUNT 46-12.741 PW-039 CHAIN LINK SECURITY FENCE AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 2-13-75 OCSD 9 3,000 Pyramid Fance $3,418.17 PO 2.28-76 $3,418.17 PW-041 ECCENTRIC PLUG VALVE INSTALLATION, PRESSURE TRUNK'S' 5-e-75 OCSD $5,000 F.T. Ziebarth $7,400.00 5.1475 B-13.75 $7.400.00 PW-043 JPL-ACTS PROCESS, UTILITY PIPING AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO.2 7-10-75 Carollo F.T. Zlebarth $21.500.00 PO 12.10.75 $24,173.00 PW-045 CONSTRUCTION OF JPL ACTS PROCESS PLANT 9.8-75 Carollo J Putnam Henck $50.000.00 10.1.75 7,14.76 $1.416,240.63 PW-045-1 JPL-ACTS SALVAGE AND SITE Invest.Recovery CLEARANCE 428.87 OCSD 41001000 Services $31,700.00 5.13.87 8.21.87 6 31,700.00 PW-046 DEMOLITION OF METER VAULTS AND SHOP AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 11-11-75 OCSD E&G Constr. $12,845.00 12-10.76 4-14J8 $12.845.00 PW-3 i ! [ l [ I d l 7 [ Il L 3194 CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. PW-047 NEW FIBERGLASS DUCTWORK FOR HEADWORKS 'C' FRESH AIR VENTILATION SYTEM AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 12-16-75 OCSD $35,000 Beverly Pen. $29,664.00 1-1476 9.8.76 $29,664.00 PW-048 REBUILD NO. 10 ENGINE AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 12-2-75 NO BIDS RECEIVED-WORK COMPLETED BY FORCE ACCOUNT. PW-049 NEW WATER WELL NO. 1 AT PLANT NO. 1 3-2-76 OCSD $30,000 Mc Celle Brae. $42,046A0 3-10-76 10-13-76 $2,946.00 PW-060 FOUL AIR TREATMENT, PLANT NO. 2'C' HEAD WORKS 2-3-76 Carter $158,798 Skipper&Co. $147,969.00 2-11-76 11-9-77 $147,969.00 PW-051 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING Southeast Janitor MAINTENANCE 2-3-76 OCSD -- Service S390/month 2-11-76 2-11-77 $390/month PW-052 AUTOMATIC GATE OPERATORS DIVERSION STRUCTURE AT Instr& Mach RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 8-3-76 OCSD -- Systems $22,688.00 8.11-76 1.12-77 $22.688.00 PW-053 32 DIGESTER DOME HANGERS 8-31-76 OCSD $16,000 Production Stl $15,508.00 9-8-78 PW-054 SECURITY MONITORING SYSTEM 6.17-76 OCSD -- Am.Diet Tel $11,150.00 7-1476 PW-055 ODOR CONTROL BLOWER FOR DIVERSION&METERING STRUCTURE(PHASE II PLANT NO. 1 8.31-76 OCSD $15,000 hear Mach Sys $10,224.00 9.14.77 1.12.77 $10,224.00 PW-065-1 INTERPLANT ODOR CONTROL FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 2-24-77 OCSD $135,000 Skipper&Cc 0119,490.00 3-16-77 9-13-78 $120.264.37 PW-055-2 MODIFICATIONS TO ODOR SCRUBBING TOWER AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 9-6-79 OCSD $15,000 P R Burka $16,939.00 9.12-79 6.11-80 $16,939.00 PW-058 INSTALLATION OF KNOTT INTERCEPTOR AND ELLIS TRUNK SEWER INTERCONNECTION (Project eenneHad-2126179) PW-4 3/94 CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. PW-057 10,000 GALLON FUEL TANK VAPOR RECOVERY SYSTEM AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 e-6-79 OCSD $3,000 Tried Mach. 83,553.00 9.12.79 12.12-79 83,660.30 PW-058 PLANT WATER AND CHLORINE PROTECTIVE BUILDING AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 2.24-77 OCSD $8,500 Skyline Conat. $8,250.00 3-16-77 9-14-77 $8,250.00 PW-059 FRESH AIR FANS FOR HEADWORKS "C" 2-24-77 OCSO $15,000 Skipper&Co. $13,165.00 3-16.77 1-11-78 $11,165.00 PW-060 PURCHASE OF 32 DIGESTER DOME HANGERS 10-18.77 NO BIDS RECEIVED PW-O60R THIRTY-TWO DIGESTER DOME HANGERS 11.3-77 OCSD $20,000 Production Stl $17,455.00 11.9-77 -- $17,455.00 PW-061 DIGESTERS 5&S.C&D, F&G GAS MIXING COMPRESSORS AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2 5.1-79 OCSD $250,000 Tried Mach. $208,802.00 5.9.79 5-14.80 $213,797.00 PW-061R-1 REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 5 AND 6 AT KENNEDY/ RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 4-24.86 JENKS 81,600,000 Margate Const. $1.595,000.00 5.14.86 7-8.87 01,627,009.74 PW-061R-2 REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS C AND D AT KENNEDY/ AND TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 2-26-85 JENKS $1.600,000 Klewit Pacific $2,435,555.00• 3.13.85 5-14.86 $2,770,640.33 and includes the PW-061R-3 REHABILITATION OF PW-061 R-3 job DIGESTERS F AND G AT KENNEDY/ TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 2.26-85 JENKS $1,170,000 Kiewit Pacific PW-061R-4 REPAIR OF DIGESTER G DOME AT PLANT NO. 2 (Emergency Repair on Purchase Order Basis for total of$100,OOO) PW-062 MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT TREATMENT PLANTS NOS. 1 &2 7.11.78 OCSD $100.000 Sully-Miller $100,180.00 7-12.78 10.4-78 $64,570.03 PW-5 3194 CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. PW-063 NEW FIBERGLASS VENTILATION SYSTEM FOR GRIT CHAMBERS AND BAR SCREENS AT HEADWORKS -C', TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 2-23-78 OCSD $34,000 Hickman Bros. $37.600.00 3-8-78 9.13.78 $37,600.00 PW-064A ACQUISITION OF PLANT AIR COMPRESSOR AT TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 3-30.78 OCSD a401000 U.S. Equip. $43,276.00 4.12.78 7-11.79 $43,486.07 PW-065 MODIFICATION OF HEADWORKS 'C' GRIT HOPPER AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 3-30-78 OCSD 620,000 Production Stl 014,950.00 4-12-78 8-8-78 $14.950.00 PW-066 MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SLUDGE HOPPER OUTLET PORT AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 6-1-78 OCSD 611,GO0 Production Sri $16,135.00 6-14-78 10-4-78 516,135.00 PW-068.1 MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SLUDGE HOPPER OUTLET PORTS AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 5.1.79 OCSD $30,000 P.R. Burke $25,965.00 5.9-79 9-12-79 $25.965.00 PW-066-2 MODIFICATION OF EXISTING SLUDGE HOPPER OUTLET PORTS AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 6.10-80 OCSO $45,000 Brands[Mach. $34,977.00 6.11.80 10-8-80 $37,870.00 PW-067 INTERIM SOLIDS HANDLING FACILITIES AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 OCSD PW-068 REHABILITATION OF INCINERATOR 2 AND RAM TABLES AT HEADWORKS -C-, TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 5-1-79 OCSD $55,000 ALL BIDS REJECTED(5-9-79) PW-06SR-A REHABILITATION OF INCINERATOR AT HEADWORKS -C',TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 7-31.80 OCSD $45,000 J.T.Thorpe $41.395.00 8-13-80 12-10-90 $47,617.80 PW-06BR-8 REHABILITATION OF RAM TABLES AT HEADWORKS 'C', TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 7-28.81 OCSD 075,000 ALL BIDS REJECTED-WORK TO BE DONE BY FORCE ACCT. (INCINERATORS REMOVED-WORK NEVER DONE-8/82) PW-6 3/94 CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. PW-069 INTERIM SEWAGE SLUDGE FACILITY SITE PREPARATION AT COYOTE CANYON LANDFILL 2-13-78 OCSD $150,000 J. AHukovich $208,500.00 2-14-79 a-13.79 $229,002.00 PW-069-1 WET WEATHER CONTINGENCY PLAN AT COYOTE CANYON SLUDGE PROCESSING SITE 10-2-79 OCSD 8200,000 Sully-Miller 9187,186.00 10.10-79 1-9-80 0226,704.10 PW-069-2 1980 IMPROVEMENTS TO COYOTE CANYON SLUDGE Sheller PROCESSING FACILITY 9.9-80 &Lohr $73,108 Sully-Miller 960,900.00 9-10-80 12-10-80 051.448.70 PW-07O FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM FOR EXISTING WAREHOUSE AT R&E Ind Fire PLANT NO. 1 4-3-79 OCSD $19,000 Protection $19,749.00 4-11.79 9.12-79 819,749.00 PW-072 MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING LAUNDERS AT SECONDARY CLARIFIERS AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 5-1-79 OCSD 9151000 P.R. Burke E26,940.00 6-13.79 9.12-79 627.573.73 PW-073 LABORATORY BENCH AND FUME HOOD ADDITIONS AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 6.5.80 OCSD 080,000 Equinox-Malibu $88,750.00 6.11.80 5.13.81 $104,730.82 PW-074 INSTALLATION OF PRIMARY CLARIFIER NO. 1 SLUDGE WITHDRAWAL PIPE AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 6.5.79 OCSD $23,000 P.R.Burke $26,664.00 6-13-79 9.12.79 $36,497.29 PW-075 APPROXIMATELY 800 LINEAR FEET OF CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH 24' GATE AT COYOTE CANYONLANDFILL SITE 5.18-79 OCSO $10,000 Crown Fence $7.564.00 4-11-79 7-11-79 $9,884.00 PW.076 PRESSURE MANHOLE AND STREET REPAIRS NEAR ELLIS AVENUE PUMP STATION 7.10-79 OCSD $15,000 Byron Cmeur 914,500.00 7-11-79 9-12-79 $17,027.61 PW-077 MISCELLANEOUS -DON BOGART PW-7 3/94 CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. PW-078 RESTROOM FACILITIES FOR PERSONNEL OFFICE AND OPERATORS' CHANGE ROOM AND SHOWER FACILITIES 11.6.79 OCSD 645,000 G.E.Leach $19,499.00 11-14-79 3-12-80 $19,499.00 PW-079 INSTALLATION OF RAW SLUDGE PUMPS AT PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS D,E. F, G. H. I&J, TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 4-3.80 OCSD $250.000 Equlnoz-Malibu 8185,000.00 4-9-80 1-14-81 8186,236AS PW480 OPERATORS' CHANGE ROOM, SHOWER,AND LUNCH ROOM FACILITIES 12.20-79 OCSD 070.000 Joe Kay Design $39.700.00 1-9-80 7-9-20 $46,441.00 PW-081 SEALING DIGESTER E DOME FOR GAS MIXING 1.15.80 OCSD -NO BIDS RECEIVED,GM TO APPOINT CONTRACTOR PW-082 INSTALLATION OF DIGESTER WASHWATER PIPING 2-28-80 OCSD $25,550 -NO BIDS RECEIVED-WORK TO BE DONE BY FORCE ACCOUNT. PW-083 AUTO SHOP HOIST AT (REBID) RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 8-28-84 OCSD $35,000 Jepson/Thomas $15,913.00 7-11-84 2.13.85 $18,263.00 PW-084 MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING SLUDGE STORAGE HOPPER BUILDING AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 6.5.80 OCSD $50,000 Brandel Mach. 044,718.00 6-11-80 8.13-80 $44,718.00 PW-085 BULK CHLORINE FACILITIES AT PLANT NOS. 1 AND 2 10-26-82 Keith $275,000 RJW ConeL $208,389.00 11.10.82 B-10.83 $217.775.83 PW-085-1 BULK CHLORINE SAFETY (REBID) PIPING AND PLATFORMS OCSD& AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2 9.13.83 Keith $57,560 Celiegua Inc. $57.560.00 8-10-83(GM) 4-11-84 $59,998.00 PW-086 ENTRY GATES AT PLANT NO. 2 1-29-85 OCSD 8601000 All BIDS REJECTED-too high. PW-088 CABINETS AND SHELVES FOR BLUEPRINT ROOM IN ADMINISTRATION BUILDING (PO 5703) 2-3-91 OCSD $10,000 Un-Mar Ind. 05,300.00 2-11-81 5-IS-81 45.300.00 PW-8 3194 CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. PW-089 CRANE RUNWAY EXTENSION— SHOP'B',RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 3-3-81 OCSD $15,000 Gen.Conveyor $9,895.00 48-81 8-12-81 $9,895.00 PW-090 MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT PLANT NO. 1,PHASE 1 1-5-82 OCSO $44,000 Griffith Co. $43,861.50 1-13-82 3-10.82 $43.740.08 PW-091 FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK AT IRESID) RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 6-1-82 Venn& Aeaoc. $14.000 OLT Conan. $15,948.00 6-9-82 11-10-82 $15,948.00 PW-092 DELAVAL ENGINE COMPRESSOR UNITS TESTING AT BLOWER BUILDING (PO 11705) Resmuecen 09,500.00 416-84 $14,500.00 PW-093 BULK HYDROGEN PEROXIDE FACILITIES AT PLANT NO.2 IConstruceon cancelled--e-15-831 PW-094 TUNNEL ACCESS MAN LADDERS AND DISTRIBUTION BOX HANDRAILS OCSD& AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2 8-28-82 Brannon $16,000 Inc.Meint.Spec. $8,780.00 10-13-82 4.13-83 $10.011.44 PW-095 REMOVE FOSTER INSULATION 10-7-82 OCSD $75,000 Mad-Tox Assoc. $8,675.00 10-13-82 3.9-83 $11,277.50 PW-096 NEW CHLORINE DIFFUSERS AT HEADWORKS"C",TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 6.1.82 Vann& Assoc. $30.000 Advanco Constr. $18,705.00 6-9-82 9-8-82 $22,144.55 PW-097 REFURBISH EFFLUENT JUNCTION BOXES AT PLANT NO. 1 AND PLANT NO. 2 2-28-84 OCSD $110,000 Advanco Constr. $106.600.00 3-14-94 11-14-84 $106,600.00 PW-098 MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 (Completed by bonding company) 11-2-82 OCSD $225,000 L&H Covet. $129.718.00 11.10.82 9-14-83 $182.412.92 PW-099 REHABILITATION OF PLANT NO. 2 'C' HEADWORKS INFLUENT SEWER GATES 8.30-83 Hangs $120,000 CK Pump $131,659.85 9-14-83 6.13-84 $132,850.05 PW-100 DRYER FOR PLANT 2 AIR SYSTEM OCSD $45.000 PW-9 3/94 CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. PW-101 WASTEHAULER TRUCK MONITORING SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 11-29-83 OCSD $30,000 Cinn.Time $18,425.64 12-14-83 411-84 618,425.54 PW-102 FILTRATE LINE TO DISTRIBUTION BOX 12.13-83 OCSD $35,000 P.C.David $33,700.00 12-14.83 7-11-84 637,418.00 PW-103 Deleted PW-104 SAFETY HANDRAILS ON SCUM BOX COVERS,PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2 8-30.83 OCSD $30,000 CraneVeyor $13,190.40 9-14-83 5-8-84 $15,588.04 PW-105 SECURITY FENCING AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 12.29-83 OCSD $90.000 Crown Fence $47,697.00 1-I1.84 5.9.84 $47,915.22 PW-106 REPLACE'C' HEADWORKS CONVEYOR AT TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 8-30-83 OCSD $100,000 G &B Morgan $76.450.00 9-14-83 7-11-84 $77,857.00 PW-107 SAFETY PLATFORMS AT BELT FILTER PRESSES,RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 8-30-83 OCSD $351000 Belmont EnerB. $32,156.00 9.14.83 2-e-84 $32,156.00 PW-108 SLUDGE AND DIGESTER GAS PIPING, PLANT NO.2 9.27.83 OCSD 4100,000 Kiewit Pacific $87.866.00 10-12-93 2-8-84 $87,866.00 PW-109 MISCELLANEOUS PAVING AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 12.29-83 OCSD $70,000 Foth&Sane $66,916.76 1-11-84 6-13-84 $90,926.15 PW-110 SUPPLEMENTAL CHLORINATION AT HEADWORKS'C'.TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 9-27-83 OCSD $55,000 Dorado Enterprises $58,179.00 10-12.83 3.14-84 658,179.00 PW-111 LABORATORY BALANCE PLATFORM PLANT NO. 1 9-20-83 OCSD 64,100 Wervi Conat. $1,547.00 (PO 13912) $1.547.00 PW-112 OFFICE PARTITIONS AND LAVATORY AT PLANT NO.2 2-28-84 OCSD W'000 Frank Ultimo $19,969.00 3.14-84 8-8-84 $20,578.43 PW-113 FABRICATION. INSTALLATION AND COVERING OF 16 STANDARD SEWAGE SAMPLERS IForce Aoeount Workl 7-11.84 PW-10 I 1 I H 1 / F G H ( t H ! H H .H 4 H t H H 3194 CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. PW-114 PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF BUDD PLASTIC CHAIN,SPROCKETS AND APPURTENANCES (Purchase Order Contract) PW-115 STAIRWAY AND WALKWAY ADDITIONS AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 12-29-84 OCSD $48.000 Paramount Md. $28,483.00 1-11-84 7.12-84 $29,483.00 PW-116 UPS SYSTEM FOR PLANT NO.2 RPUs 4-24-84 OCSD $26,ODo Ultmo 026,850.00 6.13-84 9.24.84 1125,850.D0 PW-117 MU%-TWO PACKAGED ROOF AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS FOR PLANT NO. 2 POWER BUILDING B (Ordered by Maintenance under Purchase Order-.10-15-841 PW-118 pH AND CONDUCTIVITY METERS FOR"C' HEADWORKS INFLUENT TRUNKS 4.24.84 OCSD $75,000 Allan El... 81 4.11-84 2-13-85 $55,509.00 PW-119 PAVING AND DRAINAGE AT PLANT NO, 2 10.30.84 OCSD $220,000 Ultimo $142,771.30 11.14-84 4-10-85 $179,584.94 PW-120 DIGESTER A. DOME SEAL, TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 PW-121 WASTE GAS BURNERS AT TREATMENT PLANT NO.2 5.29-84 OCSD 048,000 Ultimo $54,900.00 8.13.84 9.11.84 $65.750.60 PW-121.1 MODIFICATIONS TO WASTE GAS BURNERS AT PLANT NO. 2 (Required by SCAOMDI OCSD $100,000 Sur-Lit.Corp. $80.712.00 5.12.87 9-3-87 $80,712.00 PW-122 COOLING WATER REUSE AT FOSTER PUMP STATION 4-24.84 OCSD $22,000 Welder Engrg. 427,765.00 4.11.84 11.14-84 $23,520.00 PW-123 PIPING FOR RETURN SLUDGE CHLORINATION AT PLANT NO. 2 SECONDARY SETTLING BASINS 4-3-84 OCSD $80,000 Petted& Ludwig $54,495.00 4.3.84 7-17-84 $72,614.72 PW-11 3194 CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT. PW-124 MODIFICATION OF ONE DISSOLVED AIR FLOTATION UNIT AT PLANT NO.2 SECONDARY TREATMENT FACILITIES OCSD Serck Baker(PO) $17,952.00 2-e-84 418-84 11171952.00 PW-125 ENTRY GATES AT PLANT NO.2 1.29-RS OCSD 660,000 All bide r.j.oted--too high. PW-125 ENTRY GATES AT PLANT Shamrock (REBID) NO. 2 (Force Account) 3.2M85 OCSD $80,000 Alarm SYateme(POI9951)3.13-85 2-13.86 $93,764.17 PW-126 FULL SCALE KOMAX PROCESS 3.1484 Force Account 3-14-84 PW-127 PILOT-SCALE HIPERION PROCESS 3.1484 Force Account 3-14.84 PW-128 MODIFY TWO ADDITIONAL DAF UNITS AT PLANT 2 SECONDARY TREATMENT FACILITIES.-Force Account 4.11-84 OCSD Dorado PW.129 LURE OIL STORAGE TANK AT FOSTER PUMP STATION, PLANT NO. 2 10-31-84 OCSD $20,000 Ultimo 624,071.00 11.1484 7-10.85 $24.096.10 PW-130 LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN AT PLANT NO. 2 (Included In Job No.P235) PW-131 OXYGEN PLANT INSTRUMENT AIR PLANT WATER ADDITIONS P016378 OCSD $7,700 Dorado $6,400.00 6-484 05.686.66 PW-132 FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION OF ADAPTOR SPOOLS FOR METER REPLACEMENTS 7-3-84 OCSD 3 65,000 Floyd Kordick 6119.631.00 7.11.84 2-13.85 $141.515.80 PW.133 AIR CONDITIONING IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE ADMINISTRATION BLDG. PO OCSD Debi.Enter. $9,271.45 PW-134 LAUNDER LEVEL CONTROL SYSTEM 10-28-85 OCSD Kiewit Pacific $362,363.00 11.13-85 8-1-89 $375,577.79 PW.135 FERRIC CHLORIDE PIPING TO DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURES, PLANT 2 - OCSD PW-12 i � < < [ E a: n I t I •T Y I F f 3194 CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. PW-136 PHASE I, OFFICE MODIFICATIONS )Force Account) PW-137 (Nat Assigned) PW-138 FERRIC CHLORIDE AND POLYMER DOSING SYSTEMS, PHYSICAL/ CHEMICAL PROJECT OCSD (Force Account) PW-139 REPLACEMENT OF SLUICE GATES AT HEADWORKS C. PLANT NO. 2 1-29-85 OCSD $196,000 Kiewit Pacific 0307.667.00 2-13-85 2.13-86 $331.729.62 PW-140 AIR CONDITIONING FOR LOCKER ROOM AREA IN DEWATERING BUILDING,PLANT NO. 2 OCSD AirPlus $6,607.00 3-21-85 8-1485 $6,607.00 PW-141 FERROUS CHLORIDE SYSTEM FOR DIGESTER GAS SULFIDE REDUCTION 3-5-85 OCSD $299,000 Fraser Corp. $376.000.00 3-13-85 8-14-85 W4,227.80 PW-141 A PURCHASE OF THREE HYDROGEN (E-167) SULFIDE MONITORS RE FERROUS CHLORIDE SYSTEM FOR DIGESTER GAS SULFIDE REDUCTION OCSD $90,000 Foxboro Corp. $83,600 11-13-85 N/A $83,600.00 PW-142 SARI/SUNFLOWER DIVERSION STRUCTURE MODIFICATIONS OCSD Dorado(Force Account) 6-12-85 PW-143 DIGESTER CLEANING BED REHABILITATION AT PLANT NO.2 OCSD 6360,000 (Job Cancelled-included in Job No.J-151 PW-144 WASTE SIDESTREAM AND SLUDGE PUMP STATIONS, COMMINUTOR AND SCUM SYSTEM Berryman Floyd-Kardick, IMPROVEMENTS 1.29.86 Stephenson Joint Venture $1,354,999 2-13-86 2-11-87 $1,439,766.13 PW-145 WAREHOUSE OIL DOCK AND SECURITY FENCING,PLANT NO. 1 OCSD (Cancelled and included in J-20) PW-146 PERSONNEL ROOM ADDITION AT PLANT NO. 1 OCSD Force Account PW-13 W94 CONTRACT FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR AMOUNT AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT. PW-147 VEHICLE STORAGE AND SCREEN WALL AT PLANT NO. 1 OCSD (Cancelled and Included in J-20) PW-148 TRAINING ROOM AT PLANT NO.2 OCSD Force Account PW-149 LAB MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO.2 OCSD Force Acccunl PW-150 INSULATION FOR ENGINE PIPING Thorpe IN HEADWORKS C AT PLANT NO.29/24/85 OCSD Inwlation 818,800 10-16-BS 2-13-86 819,150.00 PW-151 REALIGNMENT AND PAVING OF GARFIELD AVENUE AT PLANT NO. 1 REAR ENTRANCE (Cancelled end included in Job No.P1.30) PW-162 REPAIR GRIT CHAMBER VALVE AT Dorado RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 OCSD Enterprises $18,195 11-13-85 4-9-86 $18,195.00 THIS IS THE ENO OF THE PW SERIES OF JOB NUMBERS, ALL JOBS ARE NOW GIVEN THE NEXT AVAILABLE Pl. P2, J OR I NUMBER. PW-14 ! I I I I I I I 1 t I I 1 I 1 I I 1 ! Updated: 3194 DISTRICT CONTRACTS DISTRICT NO. 1 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT SANTA ANA TRUNK (SECTIONS 1, It & )II) 5-12-52 M.Killer $428.612.00 5152 11-7-52 $431,507.10 DYER ROAD TRUNK(Renamed Santa Ana/Dyer Road Trunk Sewer) W. Reetz 5152 BRISTOL STREET TRUNK OCSD A. Famularo 416.52 8-28.52 $19,436.00 FAIRVIEW ROAD TRUNK 7-30-52 OCSD $314,587 J.Barrett $304,420.14 8-6-52 5-11-53 $317,226.69 1-6 GRAND TRUNK SEWER 6.IS-66 Boyle $76,026 R.DeLeon $77,250.54 6-8-66 11-13-66 $87.974.42 1.6-1 WARNER AVENUE SUSTRUNK SEWER 10.11.66 Bove $42,076 Far Western $35.318.04 10-13-66 3-6-67 $37,092.76 1-7 BROADWAY TRUNK SEWER 6-17-66 Boyle $291,005 R.DeLeon $262,399.04 7166 11-28-66 $267.694.42 1-8 MAIN STREET TRUNK SEWER 2-7-67 Boyle $177,010 Far Western $151,128.25 2-8-67 6-5-67 $158,465.80 1-9 FRUIT STREET TRUNK SEWER 1.23.68 Boyle $182,127 Scott Bros. $147,915.96 1-25-68 6-11-68 1-10 NORTH BRISTOL STREET TRUNK SEWER 5-28-69 Bove $255,550 V.Semerzich $255,550.00 6.12.68 1-17-69 $257,767.48 1-11 LOWER MAIN STREET and BROADWAY TRUNK SEWER 2-10-70 Boyle $343.120 Selata. lnc $348,317.00 2.11.70 8-5-70 $348,317.40 1.12 MAIN-DYER INTERCEPTOR, REACHES 26,26,27,28 8.9-71 Boyle $499.144 M. Maeonovch $472,146.00 8-11-71 5-5-72 $474,956.00 1.13 NEW SIPHON GREENVILLE SULLIVAN TRUNK 8.24-72 Boyle $23.775 Bobek Corp. $24,028.00 8-28.72 10.10.72 $24,028.00 (GREENVILLE STREET AND WARNER AVENUE) 1-14 RAITT STREET TRUNK SEWER 10-5-76 Boyle $1,407.966 Subelo/Anukoyich $1,277,128.00 10-13-76 7-29-77 $1,278,070.95 1-1511 SANTA ANA/DYER ROAD TRUNK SEWER MANHOLE 6.23-87 RMG $100.000 Sencon EnBr. $139,000 7-8-87 1-13-88 $152,100.00 REHABILITATION DISTRICT 1--PAGE 1 l t 1 I I l ! t I t 1 t 1 t t t t 1 t Updated: 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT 1.16 MODIFICATIONS TO SANTA ANAIDYER ROAD TRUNK SIPHON UNDER THE SANTA ANA RIVER (included in Cont. I4l-1 A-2) 1-7-92 Boyle Slave P.Radoc, Inc. $2,945,000 2-19-92 3-10-93 $3,048.238.00 DISTRICT 1--PAGE 2 [ l [ [ [ [ [ l t l l [ l l l [ [ [ [ Updated: 3194 DISTRICT CONTRACTS DISTRICT NO. 2 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT 2-1 NEWHOPE-PLACENTIA TRUNK SEWER 1-7-59 B.&L.- $2,613,900 V. Anukovich $2,344,558.60 1-14-59 3-26.60 $2,389,661.19 2-2 SOUTH ANAHEIM INTERCEPTOR TRUNK SEWER 4-29-59 B.&L.' $471,465 Sebak&Brkich $485.114.50 5-28-59 4-20-60 $ 487,687.52 24 NEWHOPE-PLACENTIA TRUNK SEWER 8-26-59 BoNe $1,097,337 J.Anukovich $1.239,085.50 8.28-59 3.9-61 $1,294,146.76 24 CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER 1-13-W B.&L.- $412,461 VenVelkBMurgh $399,199.00 2.460 6.3-W $ 400,870.08 2-5 ORANGE SUBTRUNK SEWER & OLIVE SUBTRUNK 7.29.59 B. &L.- $338,860 J.Aniskovich $348.312.50 8.27-59 4-26.60 $345,403.50 SEWER 2-5 ORANGE SUBTRUNK--PARTIAL RELOC. RELOCATION FROM CITY DRIVE TO SIKAND METROPOLITAN DRIVE 1969 ENG.ASSOC. (SEWER RELOCATED FOR CITY MANAGEMENT CORP.) 2-SA ORANGE SUBTRUNK DIVERSION MANHOLE AT THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR 11.4-80 Lowry $13,500 NO BIDS RECEIVED. TO BE REBID AT A LATER DATE. 2-SA ORANGE SUBTRUNK DIVERSION (Rebid) MANHOLE AT SANTA ANA INTERCEPTOR 12-9-80 Lowry $20,000 Sully-Miller $36,000.0 12-10-80 4-8-91 $38,000.00 2.5.1 ORANGE SUBTRUNK SEWER GROUTED RIPRAP PROTECTION DIKE-POB17124 Lowry $10,000 Paul Hubbs $9,545.00 10-28-70 11-10.70 $9,545.00 2-5-2 MODIFICATIONS TO ORANGE SUBTRUNK SEWER AND OUVE SUBTRUNK SEWER AT THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY(portion of CALTRANS 1-5 Freeway widening pro1e00 (Included in CALTRANS project) District 2-Page 1 l t t t 1 [ [ 1 [ [ [ l 1 1 l t t [ [ Updated: 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT 2-SR ORANGE SUBTRUNK SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSING 4-10-78 Lowry $208,514 J.Anukovich $276,100.00 3-30-78 6.1-78 $281,780.00 2-511-1 OLIVE SUBTRUNK SANTA ANA RIVER CROSSING 3-27-79 Lowry $173,000 J. Anukovich $189,970.00 411-79 9-28-79 $189,970.00 2-6 OLIVE SUBTRUNK SEWER AND TAFT BRANCH 3-9-60 B.&L.' $349.755 J.S. Barrett $267,529.04 3-23-60 9-7-60 $257,001.80 2-6-1 LINCOLN INTERCEPTOR SEWER FROM SAR INTERCEPTOR TO EAST OF BATAVIA STREET (Constructed with City of Orange. finished by OCSD) 2-6-2 TAFT INTERCEPTOR SEWER 8-27-85 Berryman Mladen Stephenson $1,961,070 Suntich Const. $1,679,648.00 10-16-85 4.09-86 $1,448,202.30 2-7 ATWOOD SUBTRUNK SEWER 4-27-60 Beryla $792,368 Zarubica $899,772.06 5-11-60 2.10-61 $881,746.58 2-8 PIONEER BRANCH SUBTRUNK SEWER 427-60 B&L' $91,686 R.Flickinger $83,983.00 5.11-60 9.9-60 $83.655.63 2-9 CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER 10-13.60 B& L' $116,419 West Coast $104,611.30 10-28.60 2.10-61 $108,651.20 2-9-RI REHABILITATION OF CYPRESS AVE.SUBTRUNK SEWER -Project Report: Willden -Design: Church 2-9A RELOCATE PORTION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER IBy developer) 2-9-1 & ORANGE FREEWAY SEWER 2-12 CROSSINGS,CYPRESS 7-2-68 OCSD S80,S00 J.L.Scott $52,971.85 7-10-68 9-20-68 554.105.85 AVENUE RELIEF SEWER AND YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN 2-9-2 RELOCATE PORTION OF CYPRESS AVENUE SUBTRUNK SEWER 2-10-1 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 3-6-64 Boyle $332,515 Kon ick&Son $360,428.00 3-11-64 8-12.64 $360,366.12 2-10-1A EUCLID RELIEF TRUNK SEWER 2.26.85 Lowry 05,800,000 Nuevo Camino $5,090,487.00 3.13-85 5.14.86 $5,231,661.08 District 2-Page 2 [ [ [ [ [ ! l l l [ 1 1 1 [ [ t [ l [ Updated: 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT 2-1O11-1 REPAIR OF MANHOLES IN EUCLID AVENUE(ELLIS AVE TO GARDEN GROVE BLVD) 7-28-81 Lowry, $75.000 Sanoon $39,808.00 8-12-81 10.1481 $42,304.00 2-10-2 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 4.2-64 B.&L.- $209,280 Bask. 6 231,862.00 4-8-64 10-14-64 0233,380.50 2-10R-2 REPAIR OF MANHOLES IN EUCLID AVENUE(GARDEN GROVE BLVD TO ORANGETHORPE AVE) 9-8-81 Lowry 092,790 Sancon $82.242.00 9-9-81 12-10-81 $90,470.00 2-10-3 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 7-7-65 B.& L.- $188,153 C.Brown $200,027.00 7-14-65 1-19-66 $200,692.31 2-IOR-3 REPAIR OF MANHOLES IN EUCLID AVENUE(TALBERT AVE TO BOLSA AVE) 1.27.82 OCSD $64,000 Sencon $63,895.00 1-27-82 414-82 $62.395.00 2-10.4 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 4-4-66 S.&L.' $243,179 A&P Pipeline $215,843.20 44-66 8-18-68 $221.123.20 2-10-5 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER Agmemt. B.yIe $113,279 City of Garden Grove 11-9-66 8-29.67 2-10-6 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 6.7-67 B.& L.' 0498,017 V.Samadzich 9470,723.75 6-1476 3-29-68 $471,170.80 2-10-7 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 1-16-68 B.& L.' $255,054 Far Western $237.174.00 1.25-68 6-7-68 $236,162.00 2-10-8 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 3.11.68 OCSD $409,410 Marco Constr. $373,767.50 3-13-68 10-25-68 $384,934.77 2-10-9 EUCLID TRUNK SEWER 10.7.68 Boyle $530,685 Chadea Burch $459,992.00 10-9-68 7-30-69 $461.229.00 2-11-1 ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SUBTRUNK SEWER 2-6-67 B.& L.' $248,865 M.P.Mitrovich $169,589.70 2-8-67 . 8-15.67 $170,862.06 2.11.2 ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SEWAGE PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAIN SEWER 3.6-67 S.& L.' $154,801 Industrial Pipe $161,347.05 3-8-67 3-13-68 $160,281.93 2-11.3 NORTH BRANCH OF THE ROLLING S.W. HILLS RELIEF SUBTRUNK SEWER 7-25-89 Peterson $600,000 Colich&Sons $697,356.00 8-9.89 7.11-90 $799,549.00 2.12 Soo 2-9-1 2-12R YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN INVESTIGATION 2-6-75 OCSD $27,500 M.Dakovich $24.200.00 2-19-75 4-5-75 $11,350.00 District 2-Page 3 Updated: 3M4 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT 2-13 TRASK AVENUE INTERCEPTOR SEWER 1-9-70 Lowry 999,500 Cappello $115,890.00 1-14.70 7-21-70 8t3i,853.54 2-14-1 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR FROM REC. PLANT NO. 1 TO KATELLA AVENUE Wed.Grant C-06-0741-010) 4-6.72 Lowry 98,942,015 Sully-Miller 67,676,112.00 9-6.72 7-10-74 $7.834.726.00 2-14-2 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR, FROM KATELLA AVENUE TO LA PALMA AVENUE (Fed.Grant 4C-06-0761-0101 11-7-73 Lowry 84,895,000 Kaeler/Woode $3,545,635.33 11-14-73 1-31-75 $3,573,793.00 2.14.3 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER 1 IN LA PALMA AVE FROM GROVE ST TO IMPERIAL HWY)& SOUTH SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONNECTOR (IN IMPERIAL HWY, FROM 300'SOUTH OF SANTA ANA CANYON RD TO LA PALMA AVE). REACHES 2, 3 and 4IFed.Grant NC.06-0951) 7.22-75 Lowry 83,815,183 Artokovieh,JV $3,914,462.00 8-13.75 7-22-77 $3,872,351.77 2-14.3A SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (FROM GROVE ST TO IMPERIAL HWY) MANHOLE COVERS Long Beech AND FRAMES 10-21-75 Lowry 4 3,700 Ironwork. 8 3,604.00 11-12-75 5-31-76 8 3,604.00 2-14-4 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (FROM IMPERIAL HWY TO GYPSUM CANYON RD) REACH 5 Pad.Grant pC-06-0951) 8-19-75 Lowry $4,678,458 Ke.lar/Woode $4,240,957.00 10-1-75 8-31-76 $4,328,852.00 2-14.4A SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER(FROM IMPERIAL HWY TO GYPSUM CANYON RD) MANHOLE Long Beech COVERS AND FRAMES 10.21-75 Lowry 8 5,180 Ironwork. 8 5,045.60 11.12-75 3.31-76 $ 5,045.60 2.14.413 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONTROL GATE STRUCTURE 11-4.80 Lowry 4 61,000 R.Skemnes 6 107,358.12 11.12-80 8.12.81 It 120,058.12 2-14-4C IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR CONTROL GATE STRUCTURE PO#8267 Champion Fence 4 1,414.00 8 1,414.00 District 2- Page 4 [ I 1 1 l l [ [ 1 ( l l 1 1 [ l [ l 1 Updated: 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT ANIT 2-14-4R TRENCH REPAIR,SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER,LA PALMA AVE BETWEEN IMPERIAL HWY AND FAIRMONT BLVD 10-5-82 OCSD $ 20.000 L&H Cornet. S 25,150.00 10-13-82 12-8.82 S 25,150.00 2-1 4-5 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR SEWER (GYPSUM CANYON RD TO ORANGE COUNTY LINE), REACHES 6, 7&8 (Fed.Grant BC-06-0951) 10-21-75 Lowry $2,483,167 S.Zarabica $2,096.676.15 11-12-75 3.16-77 62,132,524.00 2-14-SR SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR EROSION PROTECTION ll-480 Lowry 9 198,000 HawleyMubbs $ 153,010.00 11-12-80 3.11-81 S 160,812.16 2-14-5111 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE EROSION PROTECTION 3-25-86 Keith $ 3001000 JWMitchell Co. S 237,000.00 5-14-86 8-13-86 $ 296,900.00 2-15-SR2 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE EROSION PROTECTION AND ACCESS ROADS 2-1411 SANTA ANA RIVER INTERCEPTOR MANHOLE REHABILITATION 2-18-89 DGA $ 210,000 Sencon Ene, S 312,550.00 5.10-89 12-13-89 $ 312.550.00 2-15 YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION 9-4-74 Lowry $ 532.000 Hanck,JV $ 671,146.00 9.11-74 6-9-76 $ 696.035.00 2-15-1 YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION DIVERSION MANHOLE 3-15-77 Lowry S 25.000 Sejec Corp. S 18,994.00 413-77 5-28-77 $ 20.799.98 2-16-1 KRAEMER BLVD INTERCEPTOR SEWER, PALM DR TO IMPERIAL HWY 3-20-75 Lowry S 577,761 G.Miller $ 563,936.80 4-9-75 10-21-75 $ 602.699.00 District 2-Page 5 Updated: 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT 2-16-2 YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN, FROM ASSOCIATED RD TO KRAEMER BLVD 1-6.76 Lawry 8 660,300 V. Artukowch $ 660,287.98 1-14-76 10-31-76 S 689,085.00 2-17-1 CARBON CANYON—PALM DRIVE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH ( 12-5-74 Lowry 9 810,930 Babek Co. S 733,147.00 12-11-74 6-30-75 S 731,004.00 2-17-2 CARBON CANYON--PALM DRIVE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, REACH 2, CARBON CANYON CHANNEL TO KRAEMER BOULEVARD 11-21-74 Lowry $ 701,000 M.Dakevlch 9 539,462.00 12-11-74 7.15-75 $ 540,588.00 2.18 CARBON CANYON INTERCEPTOR SEWER,LA PALMA AVENUE TO CROWTHER AVENUE 6-474 Lowry $1,404,188 S.2ambica $1,472,160.42 6.12-74 6-30-75 $1,481,327.00 2.19 RICHFIELD SUBTRUNK(ORANGE- THORPE TO LA PALMA)-Bid w/2.20 6-13.78 Lowry $ 450,000 Christeve Corp S 503.909.00 6.1478 4-11-79 $ 520,736.13 2-20 ORCHARD(KELLOGG)SUBTRUNK (ORANGETHORPE TO LA PALMA)- Bid w/2-19 5-13-78 Lowry $ 204.000 Chdateve Corp $ 230,301.00 6-1478 411.79 S 231,804.33 2.21 CARBON CANYON DAM INTERCEPTOR 3-25-80 Brennan $1.350,000 Prkocin/Runle $1,015,195.00 49.80 12-10-80 $1,048,437.56 2.22 EAST RICHFIELD INTERCEPTOR SEWER(Changed title from OrangethoMe Trunk Connection Lowry (redesigned to SARO(Construction administered by Willden) by EMA) Belzac Const. 5.89 2-23 FAIRVIEW-WEST INTERCEPTOR SEWER Lowry 2-24 MODIFICATIONS TO CARBON CANYON DAM PUMP STATION 6-26.84 Lowry $ 200,000 Subgrade $ 138,630.80 7-11-84 5-25-85 8 135.786.92 2-25 FULLERTON-BREA INTERCEPTOR SEWER 7-29-86 Lowry $11.375,000 Colich&Sons $8,861,000.00 10-13-86 2-10-88 $9,159.831.49 District 2-Page 6 t [ d ( [ Updated: W94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT 2-26 EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER (Karelia to Broadway—Co-op project w/City of Anaheim,Road and Storm Drain Improvements--Admin.by City (Dlsts.portion) or Anaheim) Willdan Aeaoe. S.A.Healy $3.997.050.29 6.28-80 7.16-87 2.26.1 Portion of EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER (Lampoon to Orangewood —co-op project with City of Gordan Willden Steve Bubalo Grave--Admin-by CSD) 3.22-88 Assoc. $3,500,000 Coast.Co. 82,745,502.50 5.1&88 3-489 6 2,860,119.50 2-26.2 Portion of EUCLID INTERCEPTOR and SEWER (Edinger to Lampoon) 2-27 and SOUTH ANAHEIM RELIEF Willden SEWER 2-21-89 Assoc. $ 8,000,000 W.H.Ebert $9,242,538.00 3.8.89 6-13.90 $10.063,017.00 2.26-3 Portion of EUCLID INTERCEPTOR and SEWER(Broadway to Omngathorpa) $7.300,000 $6,321,005.00 2-28 KATELLA RELIEF SEWER Inc.In above $650,600.00 and (between Euclid St.and Walnut Scl Willden Steve Subtle 2.29 ORANGEWOOD DIVERSION SEWER 8.21-90 Assoc. $1.400,000 Coast.Co. $1.344.900.00 9.12-90 11-19-92 $8,649,790.08 2.30 MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR (formerly La Veto Relief Sewer) 4-28-92 Boyle $4.100,000 Mledon Suntich $3,471,857.00 5.13-92 7.1493 $3,656,604.22 2-31 SANTA ANA INTERCEPTOR RELIEF SEWER (portions of 2-14-3 and Willden 2.14.4) Assoc. 2-32 SAWPA TRUNK LINE DIVERSION GATE AND MONITORING SYSTEM 2.33 PALM AVENUE PURCHASE ABANDONMENT AND YORBA LINDA PUMP STATION IMPROVEMENTS 2-34 MANHOLE REHASILIATION ON EUCLID TRUNK SEWER AND EUCLID RELIEF TRUNK SEWER District 2-Page 7 UPdeted: 3/84 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT 2-35 MODIFICATIONS TO PORTIONS OF EUCLID TRUNK SEWER AND EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER FOR 1-5 WIDENING PROJECT "SEGMENT C"—For CALTRANS 2.36 SEWER ENCASEMENTS REQUIRED FOR AT&SF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COMMUTER RAIL 2-37 MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS AND REHABILITATION OF OUTLYING PUMP STATIONS 2-38 MODIFICATIONS TO OLIVE SUBTRUNK AND SARI RIVER CROSSINGS FOR SANTA ANA RIVER WIDENING PROJECT (Conavoction to be done by CALTRANS) Diatdct 2-Pape 8 REVISION DATE: 3194 DISTRICT CONTRACTS DISTRICT NO.3 DATE FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 3-00 Alterations to Hazard Avenue Sulfide Control Station 9-23-64 B.& 1.- $8,400 Wigga Constr. $10,334.00 9.30.64 12.9-64 $70,334.00 3-00-1 Abandon Hazard Avenue Sulfide Control Station OCSD (Purchase Order contract with Anaheim Sewer Construction) 30008 Conversion of WestsMe Pump Station Force Account 601 30008-A7 Piping for Westside Pump Station Conversion Keenan Pipe 3-12-71 3-1 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer and Busherd Relief Sewer 12-17-58 B&L $3,155,390 J.S.Barrett $2,667,727.50 12-10-58 12-18.59 $2,657,829.71 3.1 R.1 Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk 1-6-77 OCSO $30,000 BIDS REJECTED (Later incorporated into Cont. 3-1R-31 3-1R-2 Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk 12-16.76 OCSD 6301000 Rewee-Schoek 640,078.00 1.12.77 4-13.77 11 3.1 R-3 Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts,Miller-Holder Trunk 5-3-77 OCSD 632,900 F.B.Cook $48,431.20 7-29-77 4.12-78 $55,761.88 3.1 R-4 Repair of Menholea on Miller-Holder Trunk (Negotiated Contract not to exceed 645,000--job never eompletedl 3.2 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 2.25-59 8&L $1,713,250 Steve Rados $1,547.860.00 3.26-59 6-25-60 $1,603,273.64 3.2R.1 Manhole Repair,Miller-Holder Trunk 1-8-80 Brennen 655,000 Peter C.David $83,610.00 2-13-80 12-10-80 $108,232.59 3-3 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 3.25-59 B&L $1,898,682 N.Anukovich 61,846,870.00 4159 8-12.60 $1,867,532.61 3-3R-1 Manhole Repair, Millar-Holder Trunk Sower.Station 796+83 8.30.83 OCSD $35,000 George Miller $37,777.00 9.14.83 11-9-83 637,777.00 3.4-A Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 4.22.59 B&L $1,470,960 Dakovich $1,363.107.50 5.14-59 6.29-60 $1.374,155.78 34A Repair.to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer B&L $59,450 J.S. Barren (Time and Mitedalcl 1961 3.4A-R Remedial Work to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 9-5-63 B&L $67,532 (ALL BIDS REJECTED-10-11-61) District 3-Page 1 REVISION DATE: 3)94 DISTRICT CONTRACTS DISTRICT NO,3 DATE FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 3-00 Alterations to Hazard Avenue Sulfide Control Station 9-23-64 B.& I.- $8,400 Wiggs Constr. $10,334.00 9-30-64 12-9-64 $10,334.00 3.00.1 Abandon Hazard Avenue Sulfide Control Station OCSD (Purchase Order contract with Anaheim Sewer Construction) 30008 Conversion of Westaide Pump Stetson Force Account 61`71 30008-Al Piping for Westside Pump Station Conversion Keenan Pipe 3-12.71 3.1 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer and eu.hend Relief Sewer 12-17-58 S&L $3,155.390 J.S.Barrett $2,667,727.50 12-10-SB 12-18-59 $2,657,829.71 3-1R-1 Manhole Repair. Miller-Holder Trunk 1.&77 OCSD $30,000 BIDS REJECTED (Later incorporated into Cont.3.111-3) 3.1 R-2 Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk 12-16-76 OCSD $30,000 Rewas-Sehock $40,078.00 1-12-77 L13-77 $40,435.50 3.1 R-3 Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shafts,Miller-Holder Trunk 5-3-77 OCSD $32,900 F. B.Cook $48,431.20 7-29-77 L12.78 055,761.88 3-1R-4 Repair of Manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk (Negotiated Contract not to exceed$45,000--job never completed) 3-2 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 2-25-59 B&L $1,713,250 Steve Rados 111,547,860.00 3-26-59 B-25.60 $1,603,273.64 3.311-1 Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk 1-8-80 Brennen $55,000 Peter C. David $83,610.00 2-13-80 12-10.80 $108,232.59 3-3 Millar-Holder Trunk Sewer 3-25-59 S&L $1,898,682 N.Artukovich $1.846,870.00 4159 8-12-60 $1,967,532.61 3-3R-1 Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer.Station 796+83 8-30-83 OCSD $35,000 George Millar $37,777.00 9.14-83 11-9-83 $37,777.00 3-4-A Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 4-22-59 B&L 51,470,960 Dakovlch $1,363,107.50 5-14-59 6.29-60 $1,374.155.78 3-4A Repairs to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer S&L $59,450 J.S.Barren (Tim.and Material.) 1961 3.4A-R Remedial Work to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 9-5-63 B&L $67,532 TALL BIDS REJECTED-10-11-61) District 3-Page 1 [ / l [ : l ! ! ( [ [ [ [ 1 [ I [ [ [ [ [ 3t94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEEfl ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT ANIT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 3.48 Mlller-Holder Trunk Sewer 8-10-59 B&L $723,690 Dartmen Conan. 9628,880.00 6.17-59 7.23-80 $634,130.57 34C Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 9-9-59 B&L $181,209 Leo Weiler $143,253.87 9-23-59 10-21-60 $143.826.24 3.4D East Imperial Highway Trunk Sewer 8-29-60 B&L $67,041 Vukolevioh1Kordiok $73,941.48 7.28.60 10-10.80 473,600.48 3-5 Hoover-Western Subtrunk Sewer, Sugar Branch,Trask Branch and Lampoon Branch 3-25-69 B&L $653,205 Valley Engine. 9596.059.00 4.8.59 4.20-60 $602,487.91 3.6 Orange-Western Subtrunk Sewer 10.1459 S&L 0309,865 Dorfman Const. $378,640.00 11-27-59 12-29-60 0394,887.40 3-7 Artesia Branch Subtrunk Sewer 11-12.69 S&L $132,001 J.S. Barrett $107,918.99 11.2459 4-20-60 $107,734.99 3.8 Los Alamitos Subtrunk Sewer 2.10.60 S&L 01.078,572 Dorfman Conan. $831,346.80 3-30-60 4.10.61 $834,552.52 3-8R-1 Manhole Replacement, Los Alamitos Subtrunk Sewer 413.76 OCSD 915,000 George Mills, $14,999.00 4-14-76 9.8.76 $14,999.00 3-9 Magnolia Relief Sewer 4.27.60 S&L $533.070 J.S.Barrett 4853,4e6.36 5.26.60 1-11-51 $656,597.90 3-10 MlllavHolder Trunk Sewer 9-2"S B&L $286.953 Johnson Const. $263.119.50 9.8.55 4-30-66 $270,317.75 3-11 (Weateide Interceptor Facilities)Seal Beach Blvd.Intercepter Sewer 5-8-70 Boyle $651.369 2arubica Co. $602,780.67 5-13-70 1.13.71 $604,320.43 3-11 R Seal Beach Blvd.Intercepter Sewer Manhole Rehabilitation DGA 3.12 IWectside Interceptor Facilities) Los Alamitos Pumping Station 5.8.70 Boyle $375,000 Marco Const. $330,000.00 5.13-70 5-12-71 $337,553.41 3-12A Ten-Inch Vertical Sewage Pump 2-26-71 OCSD $3,200 John Stang $3,279.15 2-10-71 3.1-71 $3,279.15 3-12A-1 Piping for Installation of No.3 Pump at Seal Beech Blvd.Pump Station 6.29-71 OCSD Kelly Pipe $4,119.61 7-14-71 $4,119.61 District 3-Page 2 REVISION DATE: 3/94 DISTRICT CONTRACTS DISTRICT NO. 3 DATE FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 3-00 Alterations to Hazard Avenue Sulfide Control Station 9-23-64 B.&L.' $8,400 Wiggs Contr. $10,334.00 9.30-64 12-9-64 $10,334.00 3-00-1 Abandon Hazard Avenue Sulfide Control Station OCSD (Purchase Order contract with Anaheim Sewer Construction) 30008 Conversion of Westside Pump Station Force Account 601 30008-Al Piping for Westeide Pump Station Conversion Keenan Pipe 3-12-71 3-1 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer and Bushard Relief Sewer 12-17-58 B&L $3.155,390 J. S. Barrett $2,667.727.50 12-10-58 12.18-59 $2,657,829.71 3-1R-1 Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk 1-6.77 OCSD 430,000 BIDS REJECTED (Later incorporated into Cont.3-1R-3) 3.1 R-2 Manhole Repair, Miller-Holder Trunk 12-16-76 OCSD $30.000 Rewes-Schock 940,078.00 1.12-77 4.13.77 440,435.50 3-1R-3 Repair of Plastic Lined Manhole Shells, Miller-Holder Trunk 5.3.77 OCSD $32.900 F.S.Cook $48,431.20 7.29.77 412.78 $55,761.88 3.1 R-4 Repair of Manholes on Miller-Holder Trunk (Negotiated Contract not to exceed 445,000--job never completed) 3.2 Millar-Holder Trunk Sewer 2.25.59 B&L $1,713,250 Steve Rados 01,647,860.00 3-26-59 6-25-60 $1,603,273.64 3-2R-1 Manhole Repair, Miller-liolder Trunk 1-8-80 Brennen $55.000 Peter C. David $83.610.00 2-13-80 12-10.80 $108.232.59 3.3 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 3.25.59 B&L $1,898,682 N.Artukovich $1.846,870.00 4/59 8.12-60 $1,867,532.61 3.3R-1 Manhole Repair,Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer. Station 796483 8.30-83 OCSD $35,000 George Miller 037,777.00 9.14-83 11-9-83 $37,777.00 3-4-A Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 4-22-59 S&L $1,470,960 Dekovich $1,363.107.50 5.14.59 6-29-80 $1,374,155.78 3.4A Repairs to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer B&L $59,450 J.S.Barrett (Time and Matedelsl 1961 3-4A-R Remedial Work to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 9-5-63 S&L 967,532 (ALL BIDS REJECTED--10.11-61) District 3-Page 1 It [ t [ [ It [ 1 I 0 1 [ 9 [ 1 Q Q 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 3-12-1 Addition.to Seal Beech Blvd. Pump Station 6-5.73 Boyle $120,000 Jenkins Coma. $112,568.00 6-13-73 2-13-74 $112,568.00 3-12-2 Additions to Seal Beach Blvd. Pump Station 2-28-80 Boyle $482,000 Pascal&Ludwig 0423,548.00 3-12-80 8.12.81 $428,164.00 3-12.3 Seal Beach Pump Station Improve. ments(paving and block well) 2.23.82 OCSD $101000 Constr.Engre. $8,400.00 3.10-82 6.9.82 $10,550.00 3-13 (WmA.Ka Interceptor Facilities) Westminster Ave.Force Main(First Unit) S.S.70 Boyle $485.222 J.L.Scott $388,449.20 B-10-70 3.10.71 $400,077.38 3-13R Repair of Westaide Interceptor 3.13R.1 Repair of Westaide Interceptor 3-13R-2 Replacement of Westminster Ave. Force Mein(First Unit) 3.13.1 Westaide Interceptor Facilities, Westminster Ave.Fore. Main(Second (Schedule B) Schedule B) Unit) 7.27.78 Boyle $1.491.360 Colich&Sane $1,272.938.00 8-9-78 8.8-79 $1,279,838.00 3-14 (Westaide Interceptor Facilities) K.E.C.Co.& Westminster Ave. Interceptor Sewer 6-24-70 Boyle $734,000 Keith Card 0790,270.00 6-30-70 7-15-70 $758,431.50 3-14R Urgency Manhole Replacement 6-7-88 OCSO $250,000 (BIDS REJECTED--Change order issued to on-site contractor-S. A. Healy $190,000.00l 3-15 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Manhole Repair 10-6-69 Boyle $71,270 Cook&Sedans 09,742.00 10-8-69 10-13-71 $86,200.75 3-16 Beech Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches 17, 18 and 19 (from Resume Ave.to Rose....Ave.) 5.10.71 Boyle $517,990 Marco Coast. $453.122.00 5.12-71 4.12.72 $468,894.00 3-17 Knott Interceptor,a Portion of Reach 1 and Reaches 2 and 3 (Fed...I Grant No.C-06-0647-0101 3-9-72 Boyle $6,353,999 J.F. Shen $5,755,480 4-12-72 3.6-74 $5.812.053.70 3-17-1 Bole Relief Trunk Sewer,Reach 10 and Boles Avenue Storm Main 12-7.72 Boyle $372.000 McGuire Const. $382,414.00 1.3-73 10-10.73 $379,389.00 District 3-Page 3 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT. 3-18 Knott Interceptor, Reach 4 (Federal Grant No.C-06-0847-0101 410-73 Boyle 63,795,134 Tutor&Saliba $4,344,412.00 6.13-73 8-31-75 $4,503,450.00 3.18.1 Knott Interceptor Crossing of the Westminster Flood Control Channel (Federal Grant No. C-06.0647-010) 4.26-73 Boyle $45,000 R.L.Stuckey $59,670.00 5-2-73 7.11-73 $59,670.00 3-19 Imperial Relief Interceptor, Reaches 22 and 23 7-9-74 Boyle $597,903 Mika Prlich $832,372.00 8-1474 6-11-75 $777,943.00 3-20-1 Knott Interceptor, Reaches 5 and 6 10-8-74 Boyle $4,735,905 Sully-Miller $4,602,992.00 10-16-74 1-31-76 $4,606.365.00 3-20-2 Knott Interceptor,Portion of Reach 7 12-31-74 Boyle $4,658,949 Tutor&Saliba $3,876,870.00 2-19-75 1-1-77 $3,966,095.40 3.20.3 Knott Interceptor, Portion of Reach 7 12.&77 Boyle S4,418,000 Kordick&Rados 03,880,113.00 12-14-77 4-30-79 $3,900,107.94 3.20.4 Knott Interceptor, Reach 8 12-12.78 Boyle $1,700,000 J. Artukovich $1,472,450.00 12.13.78 9.28-79 $1,588.168.62 3.21-1 Wettable Relief Interceptor, Reaches 2S and 26 and a Portion of 27 6.3.75 Boyle $1,536,258 Tutor& Saliba $1,416.448.00 6.11.75 3-31-76 $1,439,251.00 3.21.1R Trench Repair,Wastside Relief Interceptor 11.14.79 Boyle $22,500 G.R.Frost S20,825.00 11.14-79 4-9-80 $43,646.30 3-21-1R7 Trench Repair,Westside Relief Interceptor -------Force Account Work by Wilson's Equipment Supply........................... 3-21-2 Wastside Relief Interceptor, Portion of Reach 27 and Raaohe. 28 and 29 (from (etelle Ave.and Ludington Dr.to Crescent Ave.) 4.6.76 Boyle $1,182,289 8&P Const. $1,177,745.00 4.14-76 4-22-77 S1,258,683.13 3-21-211 Trench Reconstruction, Los Alamitos Boulevard 1.24.84 Keith $225,000 RicherdeonlLeBoue/ $213,699.00 2-8-84 4-11-84 $213,699.00 3-21.311 Trench Reconstruction, Los Alamitos Boulevard, Phase 111 10-30-84 Keith $225,000 Copp Comr. $200,856.00 11-14-84 3-13-ES $206,040.88 3.22.1 Orengethorpe Relief Trunk Sower. Reach 15 3.7.78 Boyle $702,150 Pascal&Ludwig $540,287.00 3-8-78 8-4-78 $547,066.60 District 3-Page 4 t t ! I t I : t ? H I I i H rf I t t [ : t I I i 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 3-22-2 Orongethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Portion of Reach 16,Western Ave. to Thomas St. 2-5-80 Boyle 01,137,910 Mayem Const. $1,112,090.00 2-13.80 8-13-80 $1,160,209.12 3-22-3 OranBethorpe Relief Trunk Sewer, Reach 16A 5-6-80 Boyle $1,798,357 DidoAc&Zarubice $1,508,939.55 5.1"O "-at $1,597,455.40 3-23R Manhole Repair, Knott Interceptor Sewer S-17-83 OCSD $5.000 Sancon Engrg. $5,000.00 6-8-83 9-1"3 $5,000-00 3-23R-1 Replacement and Now Frame and Cover at Magnolia Trunk Sewer 12.9.80 Lowry $6.500 CK Pump $5,235000 12-10-80 3-12-81 $5.235.00 3.24.1 Kettle Interceptor Sewer 4.24.84 Lowry $362.000 KEC Co. $345,567.00 5.9.84 11-1 4-84 $348.947.80 3-24-2 Lampson Interceptor Sewer 7-16-91 Lowry $1,000,000 Peter C.David $881,000.00 8-14-91 2-10-93 01,036,542.71 3-25 Orange-Western Subtrunk Relief Sewer Lowry 3.28R Rehabilitation of 19 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 5.29.84 Fmkert $850,000 Pdich&Son. $824,240.00 6-13-84 7-10-85 $871,617.08 3.28R.1 Rehabilitation of 74 Manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 12-16-86 Fortran $4.000.000 Mladen Buntich $4,327.000.00 4-8-87 11-1-89 $4.462.640.94 3-29R Manhole Repair—Knott Interceptor Sewer 4-23-85 Hone $102,500 Sancon Engrg. $70,700.00 5-8-85 8-14-85 $71,650.00 3-30 Elimination of Direct Connections to Knott Interceptor Sower 8-26.86 Keith $50,000 JWM Engrg. $45,229.00 9.10-96 12-15.86 $45,229.00 3-31 Repair of We.tside Relief Interceptor and Loa Alamitos Subtrunk Sewer 8-487 Daniel Boyle $180,000 (Project never bid) 3-31(Rebid) Repair of Westside Relief Inter- ceptor and Los Alamitos Subtrunk Sewer Replacement 9-22-87 Daniel Boyle $200.000 Advanco $237,617.00 11-2487 5-11-88 $267.457037 3.32R Emergency Repairs to Millar-Holder TruMc Sewer, Le Habra Push... Section,Line."V and'W' Don Greek $45,000 --Force Account Work---- District 3-Page 5 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 3-3211-1 Abandonment of Miller-Holder Trunk Sower, Le Habra Purchase Section, Line"W^ Don Greek $65,000 ---Force Account Work under Emergency Repair Contract--- 3-3311 Rehabilitation of Manholes on Miller- Held.,T.&Sewer 3-20-90 OGA Assoc. $3,500.000 Saneon Engrg. 52,253,300.00 4I1.90 1-9-91 $2,317.183.39 33411 Manhole Adjustments and Street Repairs on Knott Interceptor Sewer 7.19-88 Keith $250,000 Mleden Suntich $369,010.00 9-14-88 10-11.89 3369,010.00 3-35R Rehabilitation of Magnolia Trunk Sewer, Orangewood Ave.to Ellis Ave. DGA 3-36 Repair and Sampling of Westminster Avenue Fore.Me.(Units 1 and 21 3-36R Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Maine(Unite 1 and 21 3-37 Modifications to Pomona of Magnolia Relief Trunk, Orangethorpe Relief Trunk and Magnolia Trunk Sewer for 1-5 Widening Project,Segment E (Construction to be done by CALTRANSI 3-38 Improvements to Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer System Boyle $10,300,000 District 3-Page 6 REVISION DATE: 3194 DISTRICT CONTRACTS DISTRICT NO, 5 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. (First Number of Record) 5-6 Newport Beech Trunk'S', Unit One and J.O.S. (Section Ono Connection Trunk Sewer.) 422-53 OCSD J&N Anukovich $101,755.10 4-29-53 2-2454 $102.725.90 5-7 Newport Beech Trunk-B', Unit 2 Harriman. end 3 3-25-53 Ferguson& $120,000 S.Lszaravich $123,176.00 4-20-53 1-13-54 $125,446.04 Carollo 5.8 Sewer Trunk"S'. Unit No.5 5-22-59 Southworth 6123.656 Pacific Pipe $82.307.04 5-28.59 12.30-59 $84,158.04 5-8-R Slip-Uning of Trunk B, Unit 5. Rocky Roddirg and Point to Udo Pump Stations 3-30-78 OCSD 0225.000 Cleaning Mach. $216.114.25 4-12.78 9-30-78 $228.139.01 5.9 Pressure Trunk"B" 2-26-58 Southworth Dorfman Const. $173,895.00 3-27-58 11.12.58 $174.705.06 5.10 Rocky Point Pumping Station 3-2454 OCSD Bove.&Crop $3.291.95 3-24-54 5-26-54 $3,291.95 5.11 Bayside Pump Station 4-22-60 Boyle 046,701 A.Famulero $33.089.25 422-60 9-2-60 $34.180.25 5-12 Coast Highway Trunk Sewer and Bey Simpson& &id8a flmping Station 9-1-65 Stevlingeon $426.920 J.Gelle.her $698.669.65 9-27-65 410-65 9491.175.99 5-12A Sewage Pump, Orly.and Marc,, Bey Bridge Pump Station 10-25-67 OCSD Fairbanks Morse $12,068.70 10.26-67 4.20-68 512,068.70 5-12B Sewage Pump and Drive Shaft,Bay Bridge Pumping Station 4.6.71 OCSD Fairbanks Morse t14,179.20 4-1G-71 10-9-72 $13,554.20 5.12E-1 Piping for Installation of No.4 Pump at Bey Bridge Pumping Station 6-29-71 OCSD Kelly Pipe $5,152.00 7.14-71 $5,152.00 5.12.1 Demolition and Removal of Old Bay Bridge Pumping Station 4-21-67 Simpson $3,000 GanBi Ezcay. 61,960.00 4.27-67 5.31-67 $1,960.00 District 5-Page 1 ( 1 [ I l H 1 H f t E [ Y Y H I I 1 1 V94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 5-12-2 Rehabilitation of Pacific Coast Highway Trunk Sewer from Dover Sheller& Drive to Rocky Point Pump Station 11-24-e1 Loh, $700,000 Advance Const. $405,790.00 12-9-81 4-13-83 $412,509.14 5-13 Trunk Sewer--Beck Bey Drive to Pacific Coast Highway 11-7-66 Simpson $290.000 Far Western $217,370-35 11-21.66 3.8.67 $214,828.96 5-14R Manhole Replacement and Repair Program 11-7-66 Simpson $80,000 AAA Const. $40,980.00 11-21-68 4-27-57 $42,180.60 5-14R.2 Manhole Replacement and Repeir Program, Phase ll 12-5-67 Simpson $31,900 Power Const. $27,945.00 12-13-67 4-30-68 $28,365.00 5-1411-3 Manhole Replacement and Repair 6-5-74 OCSD $25,000 Rawes-Schock $24,079.29 6-12-74 8-14-74 $24,079.29 5-14R.4 Manhole Replacement and Repair 9-4-74 OCSD $60,000 Rewes.Schock $49,047.26 9.11-74 12-11-74 $49.047.14 5-14R.5 Manhole Replacement and Repair (BIDS REJECTED 12-11-74. REBID UNDER CONTRACT NO.5-1411-510 5-14R-SR Manhole Replacement and Repair 1-30-75 OCSD $40,000 Rewes-Schock $35.365.53 2.19-75 4-30-75 $35.365.53 5-1411-6 Wetwell Repair and Remodeling at 14th St.and"A"St.Pumping Iper GM) Stations 5-20-75 OCSD $17.000 Rewes-Schock $22.90.36 6-11-75 8-13-75 $18.000.00 5.15 Bitter Point Pump Station Shuirmen Reconstruction 1-16.68 Simpson $25.000 Power Const. $22.100.00 1-25-68 4-5-68 $22,100.00 5-16 Reconstruction of Lido Pump Shuirmen Station(Fed.Grant C13536) 1-21.69 Simpson $20,000 B&M Eacev. $20,194.00 1-23-69 8-13-69 $23,342.07 5-17 Sewage Pumps. Drive and Motor-- Shuirman Jamboree Pumping Station 4-2-69 Simpson $12,500 Allied Pump $13,039.75 4-9-69 10-10-69 $13,039.75 5-18 Sewer Trunk"8'--Unit 7, Upper Shulman Newport Beach Crossing 11-9-70 Simpson $250,000 turn Engrs. $336,400.00 11-24-70 10-27-71 $327,573.00 5-1811 Relocation and Repair of a Portion of the Bay Bridge Force Mein in Schaller Contractor requested release from contract. Pacific Coast Highway 7.13-82 & Lohr $830,000 Kordick,JV $595,018.00 Bids rejected 8-11-82. To be rabid at a later date. District 5-Page 2 3/94 it JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 5-1811 Rehabilitation and Rol...Can of (Rabid) Pacific Coast Highway Sewer from Bey Bridge Pump Station to Dover Sheller Drive 2.22-93 &Lahr $825,000 Russco Coast. $936.585.40 413-83 3-15-84 $862,060.35 5-19 Sewer Trunk"W--Unit 8, Pacific Shulman Coast Highway Force Mein 8-1-72 Simpson $783,100 Tutor&Saliba $678.500.00 B-9.72 9-12-73 $790.333.00 5.19-111 Repair of a Portion of Sewer Trunk B (Emergency measural Emergency Purchase Oder No. 18276 to KEC Co.in the amount of 4126,866.82--2.13-851 5-19-112 Replacement of Portions of'S"Trunk Sewer, East to Santa Ana River Junction Structure to Bitter Point Pump Station 6-25-85 Forkerr $560.000 J.T. Malloy,JV 9420,710.00 8-30.85 4-9-96 d634,206.21 5-19-R3 Replacement of Portions of B Trunk Sewer, Bitter Point Pump Station to the Valve(combined with 5.26 for construction economies) 12.19-86 Church 0980,000 Advenco Coast. $823,750.00 1.14-87 10.14.87 $831,263.32 5-20 Beck Bay Trunk Sewer (Project denied by Coastal Commiaeion 9.8.76) 5.20A Back Bay Trunk Sewer(East Side) Simpson& (Material Purchase Only) 7-7-76 Stepper $260,000 U.S. Pipe $184,754.25 7-14-76 7-13-77 $213,305.02 5-21 Santa Ana River Siphon 5-8-79 L.0.King $350,000 A.W.Davies $357,000.00 5.9.79 10-10-79 $373,940.11 5-21-1 Construction of"A" and'S'Trunk Sewer Poeilities,Schedule A. Alternate Alignment within Plant 2, Schedule B. Junction Structure Sheller& connection oast aide Sent.Ana River 3.11.80 Lahr $950,000 Colich&Sons 6729,000.00 3-12-80 6-10 81 $761,426.17 5.21-1R Improvements to the'A' and -W Trunk Sewer Facilities Work completed under Change Order 1.Job No. P2-25.1B(8/82) 5-21-1 R1 Slide Gate Installation,"A"and "B' Malloy& Trunk Sewer 4-24.84 OCSD $100,000 Malloy, Inc. $51,000.00 4-11-84 District 5-Page 3 I I I I I I I I ! ¢ Y I € d I d d Il I , I 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT. 5-22 Sayslde Drive Trunk Sewer and Bayslde Drive Water Main, Street and Drainage Improvements IC-21291 3.4.80 Forkert $900.000 Callen&Serve $654,375.00 3.12-80 1-14-81 $726.557.06 5-23 end Reconstruction of Peninsula Trunk at 6-7 Short Street(5-23) and Abandonment of Newport Trunk Meter Vault at "The Arches" 16-7f 11-20-80 Brennen 660,000 (Bide rejected on 12-10-80. Rebid separately on 2-3-81) 5-23 Reconstruction of Peninsula Trunk at Short Street(Schedule A) 2.3.81 Brennan $60.000 J. Anukovich $62,500.00 2-11-81 5-13-81 $62,500.00 5-23-1 Rehabilitation of Peninsula Trunk from 'A' Street Pump Station to"G"Street Completed by City of Newport Beach and transferred to city 5-24 Beck Bay Trunk Sewer, Newport Dunes Sheller& to Jamboree Pump Station 6-23.81 Lahr $1,000,000 Pascal&Ludwig $579,550.00 7-8-81 12.9-81 $637,629.56 5.24A Beck Bey Trunk Sewer(Materiel Purchase Only) 5-23-81 OCSD $200,000 U.S.Pip. $199,261.95 7-8-81 4-14.62 0228,063.24 5.24E Installation of Protective Coating in Back Bey Sewer Pipe P086589 OCSD Vulcan Painters $5.95/1-F $29,750.00 5-241 Big Canyon Marsh Restoration Project 6.23-81 Hanger $200,000 J.Am.kovich $209,300.00 7-8-81 11.11-81 $231,221.60 5.24.2 Landscape Plan for Big Canyon Marsh No bid. received. GM to negotiate contract in amount not to exceed$35,000. Restoration Project 8.25.81 $25,000 Smith Reynolds 2.25 Modifications to Pacific Coast Highway 6-22-82 Sheller $110,000 C. K.Pump $133,462.00 7-14.82 5.26 Replacement of Lido Force Mein 12-18 86 LIMA $970.000 Advance Const. 6968,200.00 1-14-87 10.14-87 $987,494.08 5-27 Balboa Trunk Sewer between Lido Pump Station at Short Street and "A" Street Pump Station located on Coastline Balboa Peninsula 4-22.88 RBF $100.000 Construction $91,200.00 5-11-88 12-16-88 $88,200.00 5-27-1 Rehabilitation of Balboa Trunk Sewer, National Plant between 32nd St.and Coronado St. 9.19-89 RBF $93,000 Services $30,800.00 10-11-89 5-9-90 $30,800.00 District 5-Page 4 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 5.28 Removal of SaWIde Pump Station Pomona Valley and Jamboree Pump Station 9-23-86 Forkert $50,000 Equip.Rentals $68,128.00 10-29.86 4-8-87 $66,432.00 5-29 Replacement of Portions of Coast Highway Force Main and Gravity Sewer(combined Cont.5-29-1 eM 5.29-2 into one cooperative project with City of Newport Beech) 3.1.88 RBF $4,800.000 W. H. Ebert $6.282.704.00 3-9-88 4-18-89 $6,867.819.50 5-30R Emergency Repairs to Coast Highway Force Main and Bitter Point Pump Station(between PCH end pump station) Force Account work $137,985.21 5-31 Replacement of Portions of Coast Chrieteve Highway Force Mein 11-22-88 RBF $1,680,000 Corporation $1,491,434.00 12-14-88 5.5-89 $1,655.111.00 5-32 Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations and 5-33 Improvemente to Bey Bridge Pump Station 9-15-92 RBF $1.850,000 Uhler, Inc. $1.765,757.00 10-14-92 5-34 Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer(Prime Number) Design Only RBF 5-34-1 Phase I Improvements to Bayside Originally scheduled to be constructed with City of Newport Beach within PCH widening project--deleted and added to 5.34.2 by change Drive Trunk Sewer order. 5.34-2 Phase 2Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer 12-19-89 RBF 82,800.000 Kenko. Inc. $1,959,690.00 1.10.90 3-13-91 $2,377,455.00 5-343 Phase 3 Improvements to Boyside Silveri& Drive Trunk Sewer 7-16.91 RBF $4,500,000 LeSouef,JV 63,267,992.00 8-14-91 5.12.93 $4.757,710.00 5-35 South Coast Trunk Sewer Design Only The Keith (Prima Number) Companies 5.35.1 Phase I, South Coast Trunk Sewer 5-15.90 Keith Co. $1,250.000 W.H.Ebert $8801660.00 6-13-90 1-9-91 31,003,065.88 5.35.2 Phase 2, South Coast Trunk Sewer 11-17-92 Keith Co. $2,200,000 Mike Prlich&Sons $1.667,559.00 12-9.92 District 5-Page 5 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT, 5.38 Crystal Cove Pump Station 4-13-93 Keith Co. $1,000,000 Schuler Engrg. $933,442.00 5-12-93 5-37 Improvements to Plan 401 Sewer, in Pacific Coast Highway between Dover Drive and Bitter Point Pump Station) Project Report RBF 5.37-1 Repdn to a Portion of PCH Gravity Sewer,West of Dover Drive (Purchase Order with Christeve Corp. $26,031.00 8-9-891 5-37.2 Investigation of PCH Gravity Sewer 9.19-89 RBF $100,000 Nat'l Rant Services $77,521.40 10-11-89 S-9.90 $78,826.40 5-37-3 Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer,between Bitter Point Pump Station and The Arches Boyle 5-37-4 Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer,between The Arches and Dover Drive 6.15.93 Boyle $1,800,000 Colich&Sone 61,674,539.00 7.14.93 5.38 Siphon at Proposed Crossing of Santa Ana River South of 19th Street Boyle 5-39 Modifications to Districts 5 and 6 Siphon and Santa Ana River Siphon et Plant No. 2 Boyle (Constructed by Steve P.Rados In Corps of Engineers Meinslem Project) 5-40 Upgrade Corona del Met Pump Station and Force Main in Poppy Street and Pump (Construction Included in Cont.5.34.3 for construction economies) Station at Cameo Highlands RBF 8-14-91 5-12-93 4715,116.00 District 5-Page 8 REVISION DATE: 3194 DISTRICT CONTRACTS DISTRICT NO,6 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT. AMT. (First Number of Record) 6-5 Newport Boulevard Trunk Sewer, 17th St.Trunk Sewer and Old Santa Ana Road Trunk Sewer 7-9-52 OCSD J. S.Barrett S221,277.06 7-9-52 3-13-53 S216,459.00 6-6 Rocky Point Pumping Station Reconstruction Cook& (Fad. Grant C-13536) 9.19.66 OCSD $25,000 Barletta S24,058.00 10-13-66 3-8-67 $24.358.00 6-7 Abandonment of Newport Trunk Meter Vault at The Arches ISchedule 6) Bid with 5-23. Bids rejected 12-10-80. Rebid Separately 2.3-81 2-3-81 Brennan 420,000 Pascal& Ludwig $10,758.00 2-11-81 6 1081 $10,758.00 6-8 Abandonment of the Dover Drive Trunk Meter Vault and Connection Sewer 1-6-81 OCSD $24.800 Gillespie $28,777.00 1.14.81 513-81 $28.777.00 6-9 Fairview-Gisler Trunk (redesigned and included in S.121 Boyle 6-10 Harbor Relief Sewer 6-11 Temporary Realignment of Northerly Psomas& Trunk Sewer at Baker and Fairview Assoc. (Developer paid for construction) 6-12 Fairview Relief Sewer Boyle 6-13 Abandonment of Airbase Trunk Sewers and Construction of Watson Avenue Sewer and California Street Sewer Boyle District 6-Page 1 1 1 I [ [ l [ [ l I [ 1 [ [ l 1 I l I REVISION DATE: 3194 DISTRICT CONTRACTS DISTRICT NO.7 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR--- CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. Batavia Grove Purchase(Fullerton, Brae Trunk Pumhacel 7-1A "Schedule A' Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer 4-13-60 B&L $172,507 Berdoco $197,971.00 4.13-60 12.5-W $197.766.50 7-18 "Schedule B' Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer 4-13-60 B&L $418,598 J.S.Barrett $431.647.50 4.13-60 10.6-60 $432,449.42 7-18.1 Abandonment of Portion of MacArthur Trunk Sewer within John Wayne Airport 7-20-92 OCSD 460,000 Collett 862,000.00 8-12-92 12-9-92 $62,000.00 7.1C 'Schedule C' Gisler-Rod Hill Trunk Sewer 11.1-67 S&L $278.885 Zombies $223.868.32 11-8-67 7-5-68 $227,178.95 7-1C-1 College Avenue Pump Station and Force Main 7-1-D MacArthur Pumping Station and Force Main 7.1 E Subtrunka 410-63 S&L 840,680 (All Bids Rejected--Rebid under 7-1E Revised) 7.1E Subtrunks 4.15-64 S&L $137,690 Anro Const. $119,190.00 4-18-64 9.21-64 $135,266.00 Revised 7-1F College Avenue Subtrunk,Unit 1 and Southworth Greenville-Sanning Trunk Sewer 10-6-SS &Stevens $37,000 OC Pipeline $34,269.50 10-7-65 10-22.65 033,563.16 7-1 F-1 Relocation of College Avenue Subtrunk Sewer(Unit 1) (Home Ranch Project) IUns to be paid for by developer ISegamtroml for Home Ranch Project) 7-IF-A Collage Avenue Subtrunk Sewer and South Coast Plaza Subtrunk Sewer 9-14-66 Boyle OC Pipeline 535,292.10 10.31-66 $36.472.90 (Reimbursement Agreement-617.531.40) 7-1F-B South Coact Maze Subtrunk Extension IRA34) 9-23-69 Boyle $41,000 B.Counts $33,000.50 9.23.69 7-1G-A Smalley Road Subtrunk Sewer 10-11-68 Stevens $49.000 Scott Bros. $38,391.10 5-14-69 $39,965.10 District 7-Page 1 l l [ [ I [ l € [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT, 71-11t Repairs to Gisler Trunk, Infiltration Reduction 6.5.74 OCSD Gala.Grouting $5,390.87 6.12-74 8-1474 $9,165.87 7-1-1 Abandon Portion of Gider-Red Hill Trunk Sewer,from Bristol to 55 Freeway 7-1-2 Relocation of Gialar-Red Hill Siphon under the Sena Ans-Da1N Channel Boyle 7-2 Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sawa, 4-11.62 B&L $618,535 J.MacDonald 8566,584.06 4-13.62 3-1-63 $566,576.98 7-2A;3C and 3D Subtrunks 1-18.63 B&L 8340,805 Bosko 8316,928.00 1.30.63 9.3-63 $334.833.02 7-2AP Neal Way Sewage Pumping Station and Force Main 4-10-63 S&L $47.667 Hydro Coast. $48.492.30 418-63 9.10.63 $49.213.98 7-2AP-1 Navy Way Fore,Main Sewer 12-3-69 Boyle $41.104 Scott Bros. 638,600.00 12.10-69 430-70 $39.719.64 7-2AP-2 Remodeling of Navy Way Pumping Station--Phasel 11-6-69 Boyle $11.700 Kisling Cons. $12.385.00 11-12.69 3-17-70 $14,295.54 7-2-B South Coast Plaza Subtrunk and Walnut Boyle& Avenue Subtrunk 6-26.65 Lowry $82.115 Famco Cons. $69,260.50 6.9.65 12-8-65 $69,643.90 7-2-C Lane Road Subtrunk Sewer 2-24-67 Lowry $72,522 Irvine Ind.& For Western $72,184.25 3-1-67 7-2C-1 Mein Street Subtrunk East,Reaches 41 and 42 IRA 39) 7-2C-2 Jamboree Boulevard Subtrunk No. 1. Reach 47 IRA 39) 7-2C.3 Main Street&Von Karmen IT.t 7843) IRA 39) 7.2C.4 Main Street Trunk Sewer 6-25-85 Boyle $2,860,000 Bubaio Cons. 62,240,920.00 7-10-85 6-11-86 02,406,374.79 7-2C-P Lane Road Sewage Lift Station IRA 28) 5-25-67 Lowry 4651000 For Western 7-20-1 McGaw Avenue and Armstrong Avenue Subtrunk Sewer IRA 32) 7-2D-2 McGaw Avenue Subtrvnk Sewer(RA37) District 7-Page 2 1 I [ 1 [ [ [ ( [ [ l [ [ [ [ [ [ 1 [ 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE 810 DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTAMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 7-20.3 Von Karmen Avenue Subtrunk Sewer IRA 37) 7.20-4 McGew Avenue Subtrunk,Reach 49 IRA 39) 7.20-5 Jamboree Blvd.Subtrunk No.2, Reach 521RA 39) 7-2D-6 Jamboree Blvd.Subtmnk No.2, Reach 531RA 39) 7-2D-7 Jamboree Blvd.Subtrunk No.2. Reach 53 IRA 40) 7-2D-P McGew Avenue Sewage Uft Station IRA 35) 7.2-R Red Hill Relief Trunk Sower 5.27.69 Boyle $518,956 2arubica $492,391.20 5-27-89 1-23-70 $496,212.43 7-2-Rl Red Hill Relief Trunk Sewer, Manhole Cover Replacement 7-26-77 OCSD $10,000 M.Nottingham 48,595.00 a-10-77 11-25.77 $11,177.00 7.3 Lemon Heights Trunk Sewer 4-23-62 B&L $267,785 Stele,Inc. 8216,871.40 4-27-62 6-3-53 $219.428.73 7.3A.-4A Subtrunk. 9-20-62 B&L $164,410 DeLeon $133,872.17 9-21.62 3.8.63 $139,077.83 7-3A-1 Diversion Structure. 2.5.74 Boyle $30,912 Helopoff $25.978.40 2.13-74 5-8.74 $27,732.88 7.3A-2 " 7.38.1 " 7.3E-1 ' 7.313 Subtrunk. 2-13-63 B&L 0400,550 Howard Sewer $307.616.50 12-7-62 7-10-63 0308,361.14 7.3E Subtrunk. 5-8.63 R&L $125,950 AAA Const. 4104,455.00 5-17-63 10-1-63 $103,840.72 7.3E-2 Irvine-Newpon Subtrunk Relief Sewer 12-10-91 OCSD 9200,000 Colich&Sons $177,692.00 1-8-92 6-12-92 $270,099.00 7-48& 7-41) Subtrunk. 2.13.63 B&L 0117,200 Books Const. $109,832.00 2.20-63 9-3-63 $107,275.22 7-4C Subttunke 1.4.83 S&L $85,810 OC Sewer. $93,392.00 1.9-63 4.30.63 $99,201.09 7.4-1 North Trunk Sewer 5-16-62 B&L $365,245 Books Canal. $379,000.00 5.25.62 3.1.63 $390,880.42 7-4.2 North Trunk Sewer and West Trunk Sewer 7.13-62 B&L 8250,750 JPS Cont. 8242,915.00 7.18-62 7.3.63 $244,059.93 7-4-2A Subtrunk. 7.1.64 B&L $39,495 E.Vessels $30,295.00 74-84 9-30-64 $33,013.69 7.4.2R Tustin-Newport Relief Subtrunk Sewer 9-3.69 B&L $41.851 S.Clume $41,528.45 9-10-69 2-11-70 040,694.80 District -Page 3 [ l [ [ I l 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 7-5-111 West Relief Trunk Sewer, Reaches IS, 20 and 22, Red Hill Ave.to Tustin 8-2472 Boyle $605,000 Bomar Const. $472,680.00 9.13-72 8-17-73 $456,661.18 7.5A.1 Fourth Street Bypass Sewer 4-26-66 B&L $32,825 E.Sellere $21,445A0 4-26-66 8-4-66 $21,619.50 7-5A-2 Tustin Avenue Sewer 8-3-66 B&L $27,608 M.Mitrovich $23,303.00 8-4-66 10.14-66 $24,275.00 7-5-2 West Trunk Sewer 10-10-62 B&L $112,800 Stele,Inc. $91,526.60 10-19-62 4.30.63 $98,529.20 7-5.2B Portion of Cont.7-5.2(assigned) B&L VanDiest Bros. $76,648.36 11-3-62 4.30.63 $82,514.98 7-5.3 Waet Trunk Bypass Sewer 7-8-64 B&L $31,951 Kordick&Son $21,322.00 7-8-64 10-1-64 $20,931.00 7.6.1 Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 1 (Treatment Plant No. 1 to Bear Street) 2-17.71 Boyle $3,112,000 SullyMiller $2,290,481.00 2-23-71 3-25-72 $2,291,334.38 7-6-1-1 Modifications to Sunflower Interceptor Crossing under the Santa Ana River (in conjunction wiht Corps of Engineers/ OC EMA Mainstem Project) 7-6-1 A Bear Street Relief Trunk Sewer from South Coast Plaza to Sunflower)(west side) (Agreement with A&R Developers--to serve South Coast Plaza Expansion) 8-86 7-6-2 Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 2 from Baer Street to Main Street 4.7-71 Boyle $1,424,843 E.Fastens $1,278,238.00 4-14.71 3.15-72 $1,287,269.00 7.6.2A Plaza Drive Subhunk Sewer, Reach 39 (from Sunflower Ave.to MacArthur Blvd.) IRA 38) (Agreement with City of Santa Ana and Segerstrom-Inspection only by OCSDI $44,064.12 7-6-213 Two Town Center Subtmnk Sewer IRA 41) (Agreement with Two Town Center Associates-.6.10.81) $140,136.40 7-6-3 Sunflower Interceptor, Reach 3 and Red Hill Interceptor, Reaches 4 and 5 9-12-71 Boyle $996,301 Colich&Suns 1,060,422.58 9-30-71 7-7-71 $1,062,044.84 District 7-Page 4 I 1 [ [ l I I [ ! [ l [ [ [ [ [ [ ! l 3/94 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT, 7-6.4 Red Hill Interceptor,Reaches 6,7 and 10-19-71 Boyle $578,000 Northern Comr. $486,108.70 10-27-72 5.31-72 $489,679.78 7-6-6 TustirmOrange Trunk Sewer,Reach 10 12-31-74 Boyle $664,177 McGuire Comet. $589,572.60 1-8-75 8.21.75 $581,749.90 7-6-7 Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer,Reach 11 and a portion of Reach 12 5-6.75 Boyle $480,272 Rogers 94 Davies $349,818.00 5-14-75 10-31-75 $348,626.00 7." Tustin-Orange Trunk Sewer,Portion of Reach 12,Reach 13 and a portion of Reach 14 12-16-75 Boyle $587,620 Stave Bubslo $475,632.74 1.14-76 6.30-76 $520,453.00 7-6-9 Tustin-Orange Interceptor Sewer, Portion of Reach 14 and Reaches 15 and 16 3-30-76 Boyle 0440,312 Sully-Millar 9295,826.40 4-14-76 8.31-78 $310,727.60 7.6.10 Tustin-Orange Interceptor Sewer. Portion of Reach 17 and Reach 18 (City of Orange projec0 7-6­11 Tustin-Orange Interceptor Sewer, Portion of Reach 19 (City of Orange projecg 7-7 Main Street Pump Station 7.30.85 Boyle $3,500,000 Advance Const. $2,901,162.00 8-14-85 3-11-87 $3,058,914.53 7-7-1 Improvements to Mein Street Pump Station Boyle 7-8 Von Karmen Trunk Sewer 10-23-84 Boyle $5,200,000 Steve Babel. $5,325,000.00 11.1484 2.13-86 $5,439,090.16 7-9 Fairview Subtrunk Connection to the Wilson's Equipment Sunflower Interceptor Sewer 10-27-87 RMG $50,000 Rental. $65,788.00 I1-18.87 2-10-88 $65,088.00 7-SMD-1 Manhole Repair, Red Hill Avenue 2-26-85 OCSD $25,000 (Bide were rejected. To be redesigned and rabid( (Line brake after rebids were received; repaired under emergency purchase order authority) 7-10 North Airport Diversion Sewer(required relocation of South Irvine Subtrunk Sewer IRA 261 by County of Orange for John Wayne Airport Expansion) 8-25-87 Boyle $600,000 N.Artukovich $571,960.00 10.13-7-87 3.9-88 $586,090.00 7.10-1 South Airport Diversion Sewer 7.1988 Boyle $500,000 Advance $594,010.00 12.14-88 3.13-89 $618,636.00 District 7-Page 5 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 7.11 Modification and Abandonment of five Diet No.7 Pump Stations(Prime No.) Design Only Boyle 7-11-1 Abandonment of Lena Road Pump Station (Construction bid with 7-11-3) 11-28-89 Boyle $1,000,000 Colich&Hone $1,277,212.00 12-13.89 3.11-92 $1.357.872.00 7-11-2 Relocation of Michelson Pump Station 6-25-91 Boyle 61,950,000 Mitchell Pacific $1,827,136.00 7-17-91 10-14-92 $1.950.061.00 7-11.3 Abandonment of Coati arock and Dow Avonue Pump Stations,and Modifications to MacArthur Pump Station (Be.7-11-1) 7.12 Installation of a-Inch Force Mein at Derby Milo Wilson'. Equip. 2 Pump Station 11-15-88 Keith $65,000 Rentals, Inc. $81,901.28 12-14.88 4.26.89 $88,036.43 7.13 Campus Relief Sewer, between Von Karmen Avenue and Jamboree Road 1-15-91 Church $850,000 Albert Davis.,Inc. 6481,616.00 2-13-91 6-12-91 $535,275.53 7-14 Abend onment of Nina District No.7 Pump Stations(designed with 7-7-1) Prime Number Design Only Boyle 7-14-1 AbarMonmant of Red Hill Pump Station 7.14-1.1 Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Silveri& Ph... 1 9-15-92 $140,0()0 LeBouef,JV $90,732.00 10-14-92 5-12-93 $90,732.00 7-14-1-2 Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 2 7-14-2 Abandonment of Racquet Hill Pump Station 7-14-3 Abandonment of Covey Lane Pump Station 7.14-4 Abandonment of Lake Court Pump Station 7.14.5 Abandonment of Derby No. 1 Pump Station 7-14-6 Abandonment of Derby No. 2 Pump Station 7.14.7 Abandonment of Bent Tree Pump Station 7.14.8 Abandonment of Cowen Heights Pump Station 7-149 Abandonment of Owrhill Pump Station 7-15 Crawford Canyon Realignment lconstmctod with Tract No.8489 by Cornlche Dev.1 IRelmbumement Agraamen0 District 7-Page 6 e e [ e e [ e [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ e e [ 3M4 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 7-16 Lemon Heights Sewer System (Study) Design Boyle 7-17 Replacement of a Portion of Orange Park Acres Sewer,from Mercian Avenue to Chapman Avenue Boyle 7-19 Orange Perk Acme Sewer System-- Master Plan Boyle 7-19 Cowen Heights Sewer Syetem-- Master Plan Boyle 7-20 Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main and Replacement Gravity Sewer 7-13-93 Boyle $1,363,000 Polar C. David Co. $937,480.00 8-11-93 7-21 Sunflower Interceptor Manhole Rehab- ilitation(between Treatment Plant No. 1 antl ) 7.22 Parallel end Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtmnk System,Le Coline Drive to Newport Blvd. 7.23 Gisler-Red Hill Parallel Force Main(from College Avenue Pump Station to Iowa St.) Boyle 7.24 Manhole Access Modifications to RA-14 Sewer at Newport Boulevard and Cowen Heights Drive District 7-Page 7 I t t [ [ [ [ I I Updated: 3194 DISTRICT CONTRACTS District No. 11 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 11.0 HUNTINGTON BEACH TRUNK SEWER 6-2453 Izzi Constr. 045.580.00 7-22.53 10-28-53 $45,580.00 11-00 HUNTINGTON BEACH SEWAGE PUMPING PLANT 6-2453 F.J.Early $27,480.00 8-1-53 4-28-54 $27,480.00 11-1 NEWLAND-DELAWARE GRAVITY TRUNK 11-5-58 L&O' G.DakoYlch $419,827.22 11-19.58 4.30-59 $425,469.29 11-1R-1 MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR, NEWLAND-DELAWARE TRUNK 3.2-76 OCSD $46,000 Rewes-Schock $37,253.00 3-10-76 9.8-76 $35,382.00 11-2 ATLANTA AVENUE INTERCEPTOR 12-17-58 L&O' $48,330 J.Barrett $58.946.55 12-19-SB 3-30-59 $60,552.28 11-3 GOLDENWEST TRUNK UNIT 12-17-58 L& 0' $100,074 Dorfman Carat. $79.675.30 12-19.58 4.30-59 $82,899.94 11.3-1 INSTALLATION OF TWO MANHOLES Wilson's Equip ON GOLDENWEST TRUNK SEWER 10-29-85 OCSD $48,500 Rental, Inc. $59,900.00 11-13-85 3-12-86 $60,765.00 11-4 HAMILTON AVENUE FORCE MAIN AND NEWLAND STREET 1-7.59 L&O' $112,000 Waardco Cana[. $98,528.50 1-14-59 8.3.59 $100,665.35 PUMP STATION 11-4R REMODEL NEWLAND-HAMILTON PUMPING STATION FACILITIES 10-30-75 OCSO $15,612 C.Thompaon $19,821.00 11.12-75 5-12-76 $21,193.26 11.5 GOLDENWEST PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAIN 1.7.59 L& O' $111,500 Baltic Const. $109,956.38 1-14.59 8-21-59 $108,891.76 11-6 SLATER-SPRINGDALE TRUNK SEWER 2-26-59 L&O' $422,863 Dorfman Comet. $338,202.00 3-26-59 B-21-59 $344,212.87 11.6A& CONSTRUCTION OF MANHOLES ON 11.IIA SPRINGDALE TRUNK SEWER 12.9.80 Lowry $10,500 G.R.Frost $15,000.00 1.6.81 4-8-81 $15,000.00 (11-6A) AND SLATER-SPRINGDALE RELIEF SEWER (11-11A) - BID WITH 12-BA IREBIDI AND 3-23R.1 (BIDS WERE REJECTED AND LATER ASSIGNED TO G.R.FROST BY G.M.) 11-6R-1 MANHOLE REPAIR, SLATER-SPRINGDALE TRUNK SEWER 1-27-77 $12,340 (ALL BIDS REJECTED-3.16-77) District I I-Page 1 1 1 I [ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Updated: 3M4 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT 11-7 SMELTZER-BOLSA CHICA AND SMELTZER LIFT STATION 2-25-59 L&O• $105.415 L.L.Dabkins $103,530.60 3-26-59 9-1-59 $104.775.01 11-8 NEWLAND STREET INTERCEPTOR 5-22-59 L& 0' $11,880 Wesrdo.Coast. 011,841.00 6-6-59 8-3-59 911,1141.00 11.9 EDINGER AVE GRAVITY SEWER AND LIFT STATION 6-1-66 Lowry $135,580 O.C. Pipeline 9140,618.65 8-3-85 4-4-66 $142,234.68 11-10.1 SLATER AVE GRAVITY SEWER AND NICHOLS ST GRAVITY SEWER 5-9-66 Lowry $158,240 O.C. Pipeline $116,594.30 5.11.68 9-23-66 $116,568.80 11-10-2 SLATER AVE GRAVITY SEWER AND SLATER SEWAGE PUMPING STA. 9-12.66 Lowry $199,345 Lomas Corp. $251,692.05 9-14-66 3-23-67 $251.582.25 AND FORCE MAIN SEWER 11.10-2R SLATER AVE WET WELL REPAIR 12-6-73 Keith $11,145 F.B.Cook 914,856.63 12-19-73 1-e-75 829,371.93 11.10.3 MODIFICATIONS TO THE SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION AND 1-6.82 Keith 0175,000 KEC-Keith $118,030.00 1-13-82 6-9-82 0129,973.42 NEW FORCE MAIN 11.10-3R URGENCY REPAIRS TO SLATER PUMP STATION 1-13-88 (Farce Account-not to exceed 9100,000-included in Contract No. 11.16 work) 11.11 SPRINGDALE AND EDINGER RELIEF TRUNK SEWER 3-6-70 Keith $735,896 Selate Inc. 9710,700.00 3.11.70 9.13.70 9718,786.52 11-11-1 WARNER AVENUE RELIEF TRUNK, PHASE I (PURCHASE FROM THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, SEE RES.NO.77-108-111 11.11-2 WARNER AVENUE RELIEF TRUNK, PHASE II (PURCHASE FROM THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH) 11-11R-1 MANHOLE RECONSTRUCTION, PHASE) 5.1-68 Lowry $2.700 Cook& Barletta $5,250.00 5.8-68 9-11.68 8 5.250.00 11-12 SLATER AVENUE TRUNK SEWER EXTENSION 1-8-74 Keith $476,815 Kordick& Son $419,000.50 1-9-74 7-10-74 $429,682.38 11-13.1 CHANGE ORDER TO P2-23-6 Keith District 11-Page 2 t 1 I t t t t [ t t t t t t t t 1. Updated: 3194 FINAL JOB NO. TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT AMT 11-13-2 COAST TRUNK SEWER, REACH 1 AND 2,PORTION OF NEWLAND ST INTERCEPTOR SEWER AND LAKE AVE RELIEF SEWER (Fed.Grant pC-06-1073-510) 8-9-79 Keith $7,500,000 J.Artokovich $7,488,964.53 9-12-79 2-11-81 $8,141,526.18 11-13-3 C0AST TRUNK SEWER,REACH 3 1-19-82 Lawry $3,900,000 S. Rebnln $3,040,623.00 4-14-92 9-14-83 $3,361,815.95 11-14 NEWLAND STREET INTERCEPTOR SEWER 8-5-80 Keith $1,500,000 G. R. Frost $1,007,030.00 8-13-80 8-12-81 $1,011.265.00 11-15 INSTALLATION OF A 24-INCH DUCTILE CAST IRON PARALLEL FORCE MAIN IN SLATER AVENUE 11-16 REHABILITATION OF OCEAN AVENUE TRUNK SEWER,LAKE STREET TO GOLDEN WEST(before transferring line to City of HE) F26.88 Boyle $600,000 Christeve Corp. $727.114.00 5-11-88 12-11-88 $790.263.46 11-17 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Phase 1-Prelirninery Engineering Cerollo Phase 2-Final Design Cerollo 11-17-1 SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 9-10-93 Cerollo $6,500,000 Cohen&Sons $4,626,370.00 9-8.93 District 11-Page 3 t t t t t t e t c ! i t t REVISION DATE: 3194 DISTRICT CONTRACTS DISTRICT NO. 14 FINAL JOB NO, TITLE BID DATE ENGINEER ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CONTRACT AMT. AWARD COMPLETE CONT.AMT. 14.1 PROJECT REPORT ON JOINT SEWAGE CONVEYANCE FACILITIES TO SERVE DISTRICTS 8, 7 AND 14 (RESULTED IN 3 PROJECTS,CONTE.NOS. 14.1-1. 14-1.2 AND 8.12) Boyle 14-1-1A BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR, FROM FAIRVIEW ROAD TO PLANT NO. 1 BoNa Mladen Buntich $8,278,983 1-12.94 14.1.1A-1 BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR SIPHON UNDER THE GREENVILLE. BANNING CHANNEL B4Me (Included In Corps of Engineers/OC EMA Meinslem Project) 14.1-1A-2 BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR, FROM RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 TO GISLER AVE. (INCLUDES CONT. 1-16) 1.7-92 Boyle 83,200,000 Steve P. Red.. 92,945,000.00 2.19.92 3.10-93 $3,048,238.00 14-1-iB BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR, FROM BRISTOL STREET TO FAIRVIEW ROAD 8-20-89 BovIe $7,475,000 Steve Subalo $5,345,530.00 7.12.89 10-1P90 $5,544,470.30 14-1-2 BAKER FORCE MAINS 10.23.90 Boyle $7,000,000 Mladen Sundial, $4,773,395.00 11-14-90 10-9-91 95,850,625.00 i I Dletriot 14.Page 1