Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1993-11-10 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS etyx yi me 4,d� OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272E-6127 a 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 0e cW1"y (714)962-2411 November 4, 1993 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS, 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY. NOVEMBER 10, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Assistant a d ecretary Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, November 17th, at 5:30 p.m. JOINT WORKS SELECTION - Thursday, November lath, at COMMITTEE 7:30 a.m. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE - Thursday, November 15th, at 5:30 p.m. SPECIAL AD HOC COMMITTEE - Tuesday, November 23rd, at RE SERVICE TO OUTSIDE 5: 30 p.m. AREAS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, December 1st, at 5:30 p.m. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ' W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA JW4 Ew AVENUE 01418 -WI JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings November Nov 10, 1993 Dec 01, 1993 December Dec 08, 1993 None Scheduled January Jan 12, 1994 Jan 26, 1994 February Feb 09, 1994 Feb 23, 1994 March Mar 09, 1994 Mar 23, 1994 April Apr 13, 1994 Apr 27, 1994 May May 11, 1994 May 25, 1994 June Jun 08, 1994 Jun 22, 1994 July Jul 13, 1994 Jul 27, 1994 August Aug 10, 1994 None Scheduled September Sep 14, 1994 Sep 28, 1994 October Oct 12, 1994 Oct 26, 1994 November Nov 09, 1994 None Scheduled f BOARDS OF DIRECTORS 1 County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,Callfornia Fountain Valley,CA 927288127 Telephone:(714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 10, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. (6) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel 11/10/93 (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - October 13, 1993 regular District 2 - October 13, 1993 regular District 3 - October 13, 1993 regular District 5 - October 13, 1993 regular District 6 - October 13, 1993 regular District 7 - October 13, 1993 regular District 11 - October 13, 1993 regular District 13 - October 13, 1993 regular District 14 - October 13, 1993 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See pages "A„ and "B" 10/06/93 10/20/93 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 539,521 .98 $ 817,406.13 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,437,804.25 552,793.20 Joint Working Capital Fund - 135,522.65 174,048.73 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 4,070.44 26,621 .08 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 103.60 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 3,569.99 3,586.41 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 44,349.92 25,591.72 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 3,400.45 92,621.67 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 42.75 41.97 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 27,122.51 487,471.71 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 438.65 7,582.49 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 0.00 17,141.77 DISTRICTS NOS 5 & 6 JOINT 3,017.87 196,193.16 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,297.02 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 1,255.76 0.00 $2,205,517.84 52,401 ,100.04 -2- 11/10/93 (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9( ) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-143, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Chlorine in Bulk, Specification No. C-030, to DX Systems Company for the price of $407.70 per ton, including environmental excise tax, plus applicable sales tax, for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1993, with provision for four one-year extensions (Estimated annual cost $815,400.00 plus tax). See page "C" (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-144, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Chlorine in One-Ton Cylinders, Specification No. C-031 , to Continental Chemical Company for the price of $345.00 per ton, plus environmental excise tax and all applicable sales tax, for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1993, with provision for four one-year extensions (Estimated annual cost $86,250.00). See page "D" -3- 11/10/93 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 26 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing a net addition of $173,975.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for seven items of added or deleted work, granting a time extension of 59 calendar days for completion of said additional work and for a contract-specified bonus payment for 51 days early completion of certain work, based on the rate of $3,000.00 per day. See page (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, authorizing a deduction of $54,000.00 from the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for deletion of contractor's "All Risk" insurance requirement to be covered under the Districts' master policy at a savings. See page "F" (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2, authorizing a deduction of $13,600.00 from the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for deletion of contractor's "All Risk" insurance requirement to be covered under the Districts' master policy at a savings. See page "G" (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill for design and programming services required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31, providing for preparation of a study to review the existing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system and recommend possible control system changes. (g) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 59559 issued to TEAM Environmental Services, Inc., providing for the conduction of air quality emissions testing on the waste digester gas flares at both plants in the amount of $16,481.44, increasing the total authorized amount from $13,350.00 to an amount not to exceed $29,831 .44. -4- 11/10/93 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (h) Consideration of the following actions relative to extending temporary Specific Term Employment Agreements pertaining to Molecular Microbiology research work being conducted by the Districts' Laboratory pursuant to grants from the National Water Research Institute: (1 ) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to execute a new temporary Specific Term Employment Agreement with George Bonilla, for an additional one-year period effective November 15, 1993, for an authorized maximum amount of $27,500.00. (2) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to execute a new temporary Specific Term Employment Agreement with Bich Tran, for an additional one-year period effective November 15, 1993, for an authorized maximum amount of $27,500.00. (i) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief relative to litigation entitled Home Insurance Company v. Brinderson Corporation, at al., U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Case No. CV-93-3697 RWSL (JRx), and authorize the Districts' General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. Ijl Consideration of motion ratifying action of staff in issuing Purchase Order No. 64943 to Matrix Services, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $60,346.00 plus applicable sales tax, for Emergency Repairs to Plant No. 2 Low Pressure Gas Holder (Specification No. R-042). DISTRICTS 3 & 11 (k) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1, authorizing a deduction of $27,625.00 from the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons for deletion of contractor's "All Risk" insurance requirement to be covered under the Districts' master policy at a savings. tSee page "H" -5- 11/10/93 (9) DISTRICTS 3 & 11 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (q Consideration of Resolution No. 93-147, approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Phase I Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $694,121.00. See page "I" DISTRICT 5 (m) Consideration Resolution No. 93-148-5, approving and authorizing execution of a Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for facilities necessary to provide electrical service to Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36. See page "J" END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -6- 11/10/93 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees' written reports of their meetings on October 20, 1993 and October 27, 1993, respectively (copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said Committees: (1) Actions relative to implementing a Taxable Commercial Paper Program (TCPP): (a) Consideration of motion directing staff and consulting financing team members to proceed with implementation of a $50 million Taxable Commercial Paper Program (TCPP). (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-145, approving letter agreement with Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe dated October 14, 1993 to serve as Special Counsel for said taxable commercial paper program for a fee not to exceed $30,000.00. See page "K" (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-146, approving memorandum agreement with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin dated October 13, 1993 to serve as Co-Counsel for said taxable commercial paper program for a fee not to exceed $5,000.00. See page (d) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to secure the services of Moody's and Standard & Poor's, in a total amount not to exceed $75,000.00 to determine whether the Districts can proceed with a TCPP using Districts' liquidity or whether obtaining a line of credit is necessary; and to obtain a short-term credit rating. (a) Consideration of motion approving Letter Agreement with Lehman Brothers to provide banking services for the TCPP for a 5.0 basis point commission which is to be included in the all-in interest cost of the TCPP (Estimated annual fee is $25,000.001. [ITEM 01) CONTINUED ON PAGE 81 -7- 11/10/93 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 7) (b) (2) Consideration of motion authorizing preparation of the Air Quality Management Implementation Plan as a supplement to the Districts' 30-year "2020" VISION Wastewater Management Action Plan in the estimated amount of $150,000.00 for the in- house costs of Phase I and II of said plan; and, authorize and direct staff to proceed with Phase I of said plan (3) Actions relative to the Biofiltration Demonstration Project, amending the Boards' actions of November 18, 1992 and April 14, 1993: (a) Consideration of motion approving amendments to the Biofiltration Demonstration Project authorizations to reflect revised estimated project costs and funding as follows: Demonstration Project Budget Original Previous Existing Proposal Proposed Budget Item Authorization Revisions Authorization Revisions Authorization Staffing S 62,000 S 45,000 $107,000 $ 21,000 $128,000 Equipment 25,000 (10,000) 15,000 15,000 Supplies 14,000 (510001 91000 8,000 17,000 Travel 5,000 5,000 5,000 Contracts 174,000 (330,0001 144,000 7100 216,000 TOTALS 283 0.000 3280.000 $100.000 3380.000 [ITEM (11) CONTINUED ON PAGE 91 -8- 11/10/93 (11) ALL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 8) Demonstration Project Funding Proposed Proposed Source Existina Revision Funding SCAOMD $125,000 $125,000 WERF 30,000 30,000 SCE 50,000 50,000 Subtotal Outside $205,000 $205,000 Funding CSDOC 75,000 100,000 175,000 TOTAL 2S 80.000 9100.000 �380.000 (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to procure the needed additional contract analytical laboratory services to conduct necessary testing pertaining to the Biofiltration Demonstration Projects, in accordance with established procurement policies. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to execute an extension to the temporary Specific Term Employment Agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services, for an additional three and one-half months, for a revised total of fifteen and one-half months, Increasing the authorized maximum from $45,000.00 to $58,000.00. -9- 11/10/93 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Public hearing relative to the following proposed Ordinances of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (See enclosure included with Directors' agenda material) District Ordinance No. 1 122 2 217 3 320 5 529 6 623 7 730 11 1119 13 1313 14 1405 (1) Open hearing (2) Verbal Report of General Counsel (3) Receive and file written comments, if any (4) Oral public comments, if any (5) Staff response to comments (6) Close hearing (b) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 122, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 122 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 122. -10- [ITEM (12) CONTINUED ON PAGE 111 11/10/93 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 10) (c) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 217, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 217 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 217. (d) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 320, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 320 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 320. (a) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 529, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 529 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 529. -11- [ITEM (12) CONTINUED ON PAGE 121 11/10/93 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 11) (f) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 623, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 623 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 623. (g) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 730, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 730 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 730. (h) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1119, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1119 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 1119. -12- (ITEM (12) CONTINUED ON PAGE 131 11/10/93 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 12) (i) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1313, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1313 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 1313. (j) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1405, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1405 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 1405. (13) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Public hearing relative to the following proposed Ordinances of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers: (See enclosure included with Directors' agenda material) District Ordinance No. 1 123 2 218 3 321 5 530 6 624 7 731 11 1120 13 1314 14 1406 -13- [CONTINUED ON PAGE 141 11/10/93 (13) ALL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 13) (a) (1) Open hearing (2) Verbal Report of General Counsel (3) Receive and file written comments, if any (4) Oral public comments, if any (5) Staff response to comments (6) Close hearing (b) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 123, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 123 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 123. (c) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 218, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 218 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 218. -14- [ITEM 0311 CONTINUED ON PAGE 151 e 11/10/93 (13) ALL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 14) (d) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 321, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 321 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 321 . (a) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 530, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 530 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 530. (f) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 624, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 624 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 624. -15- [ITEM (13) CONTINUED ON PAGE 161 e 11/10/93 (13) ALL DISTRICTS (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 15) (g) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 731, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 731 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present)• (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 731 . (h) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1120, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1120 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present)• (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 1120. (i) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1314 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 1314. -16- [ITEM 0311 CONTINUED ON PAGE 171 e 11/10/93 (13) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONTINUED FROM PAGE 16) W DISTRICT 14 Consideration of the following actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 1406, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers: (1) Consideration of motion to read Ordinance No. 1406 by title only and waive reading of said entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (2) Consideration of roll call vote motion adopting Ordinance No. 1406. (14) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of their meeting on October 28, 1993 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of term and compensation for the post of Joint Chairman. See pages "M" and "N" (16) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Verbal staff report (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-150, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Phase Wastehauler Dumping Facilities Modifications, Job No. P1-46-1, to Dorado Enterprises, Inc., in the total amount of $248,953.00. See page "0" (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file Annual Audit Report submitted by KPMG Peat Marwick, Main & Company, Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1993 (mailed to Directors under separate cover by auditors). -17- J 11/10/93 (18) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (19) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (221 DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn -18- 11/10/93 (24) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda Items, if any (27) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (31) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (32) DISTRICTS 6. 7 & 14 (a) Verbal staff report (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-149, approving plans and specifications for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids subject to approval of the condemnation settlement agreement with Sanwa Bank by the Court (tentative bid date December 14, 1993). See page "I " -19- 11/10/93 (33) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (34) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (35) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (36) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (37) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (38) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn -20- 41ANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8427. 10844 Ellls Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,CA9272"127 Telephone:(714)962.2441 JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE NOVEMBER 10. 1993 AT 7:30 P.M. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self- explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a): AWARD PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN BULK, SPECIFICATION NO. C-030. Historically, the Districts have used bulk chlorine for odor control in a system consisting of one centralized 25-ton tank and associated distribution equipment at Plant No. 1, and two centralized 25-ton tanks and related distribution piping and equipment at Plant No. 2. Recently, our bulk chlorine usage has dropped to below 2,000 tons per year from 4,000 tons per year in the past. This decrease is primarily due to switching to hydrogen peroxide at Treatment Plant No. 2. Hydrogen peroxide was successfully tested and implemented at Plant No. 2 and is in the process of being implemented at Plant No. 1. The Districts may also use up to 250 tons of chlorine purchased in one-ton cylinders during the 1993-94 fiscal year, under a separate contract, as backup for the bulk stations and for remote areas of the plants with lower usage rates. (See Item 9(b).) On October 5, 1993, four sealed bids were opened (two of which turned out to be "no bids) for supplying bulk chlorine for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1993, with the Districts' standard option clause to renew for four additional one-year extension periods under mutually agreeable terms. The high bid was $450.00 per ton. The low bidder was DX Systems Company at $407.70 per tan, including environmental excise tax, plus sales tax. This price represents a $178.30 per ton price increase (approximately 78%) from the current contract price of $229.40. Based on price trends, the Boards have previously authorized the staff to substitute hydrogen peroxide for chlorine. Based on the 78% price increase in chlorine, using hydrogen peroxide at Plant No. 2 instead of chlorine will actually save about $360,000 per year in chemical costs. Staff estimates implementation at Plant No. 1 will save an additional $200,000 by further reducing the use of bulk November 10, 1993 chlorine. We cannot yet eliminate the use of chlorine because it is used in the air scrubbers, to chlorinate plant water and for standby use for outfall disinfection, if needed. However, a consulting engineer is currently studying alternatives for the future. The biggest single application for chlorine is in the manufacture of PVC pipe and fittings, which is a rapidly growing industry. Many of the strengths in chlorine demand in the United States have been in the export market. Ironically, notwithstanding the increasing demand, the number of chlorine manufacturers has declined due to other economic and environmental pressures. Chlorine is the byproduct of caustic soda, which is also used in the Districts' odor control operations. When chlorine prices increase because of demand, prices generally decrease for caustic soda. The market price of chlorine has escalated significantly during the past six months. Therefore, it is anticipated that the Districts' caustic soda costs will decrease in the near future. Staff recommends award of a contract to DX Systems Company, the lowest responsible bidder, for purchase of bulk chlorine for the unit price of $407.70 per ton, including environmental excise tax, plus sales tax, for a one-year period, with provisions for four one-year extensions under mutually agreeable terms. Estimated annual cost for the new contract, based on 2,000 tons is $815,400.00 including environmental excise tax, plus sales tax. 9(b): AWARD PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN ONE-TON CYLINDERS. SPECIFICATION NO. C-031. On October 5, 1993, five bids (one of which was a "no bid") were received to furnish and deliver chlorine in one-ton cylinders for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1993. The one-ton cylinders are used for odor control in remote areas of the plants with a low usage rate. They are also used as a backup in case of emergency shutdowns of the bulk chlorine system. (See separate discussion of chlorine market under Item 9(a).) The bid price per ton varied from a high bid of $529.70 to a low bid of $345.00 per ton, exclusive of environmental excise tax and sales tax. The low bid, which was submitted by Continental Chemical Company, is $95.00 per ton higher (38%) than the expiring contract. Staff recommends award of the Purchase of Chlorine in One-Ton Cylinders, Specification No. C-031, for a one-year period, be awarded to Continental Chemical Company, the lowest responsible bidder, for a unit price of -2- November 10, 1993 $345.00 per ton, plus environmental excise tax and sales tax, with provisions for four one-year extensions under mutually agreeable terms. The annual quantity of chlorine to be purchased in one-ton cylinders, based on a projected usage of 250 tons, represents an estimated cost of $86,250.00, plus environmental excise tax (currently 2.2%) and sales tax. Sic): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 26 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO, J-19-1. Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, designed by Brown and Caldwell Engineers, is part of the $75 million master- planned Central Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at both plants. The $16.9 million contract includes installation of three prepurchased digester-gas burning, spark-ignited, 3,473 horsepower engines with generators that are each capable of producing 2,500 kilowatts of electrical power. Change Order No. 26 is a net addition of $173,975.00 and 59 calendar days to the contract for seven Items of additional work or contract provision settlements, and one deleted Item. Item 1, in the amount of $153,000.00, is for the early completion bonus provided for in Change Order No. 10, Item 2, approved by the Boards on June 10, 1992. Change Order No. 10 resolved several contract issues and revised criteria for receipt of the contract bonus of $3,000.00 per calendar day as specified in Special Provisions Section 50-8 of the original contract documents pertaining to early/late completion bonus/penalty provisions. In general, the new criteria allowed the bonus/penalty to be calculated beginning the first day after completion of a successful five-day period of operation of the generators in parallel with Southern California Edison. The criteria for receipt of a bonus, or payment of a penalty, were negotiated prior to knowledge of the engine problems. As the Directors are aware, the Central Power Generation project at Plant No. 2 suffered serious delays and damages because of engine contamination, apparently caused by the engine manufacturer and the installation contractor. To avoid this problem at Plant No. 1, the engines and auxiliary equipment furnished by Cooper were separately cleaned and paid for under previous change orders, which included payment for contractor's delay. The contractor was not eligible for any bonus payments for that delay. A determination by the Directors to seek recovery of these added costs will be made at a later date. The revised contract completion date, with approved time extensions, is November 10, 1993. The contractor successfully accomplished the five-day -3- November 10, 1993 period of operation on June 28, 1993, or 136 calendar days prior to November 10, 1993. The new criteria also stipulated that the contractor would only be eligible for a maximum bonus of $153,000.00 in the event the test was successfully accomplished earlier than 51 calendar days before the contract completion date. Item 2, in the amount of $13,503.00 and 59 calendar days, resolves disputes regarding all contractor-extended supervision and engineering costs remaining on this contract, field testing of engine/generator equipment, absorption chiller start-up and controls, and engine exhaust gaskets. (The 59-day time extension does not affect the operational bonus, Item 1.) The final period allowed for extended supervision and engineering costs is 21 calendar days from June 19, 1993 through July 9, 1993. All extended supervision and engineering costs incurred by the contractor after July 9, 1993 are at no cost to the Districts. The contractor's daily rate for extended overhead through June 18, 1993, agreed to in Change Order No. 21, was $1,068.00 per calendar day. The staff negotiated a new reduced rate for this final 21-day period of $643.00 per calendar day as part of the settlement. The contractor has agreed not to submit any claims related to absorption chiller equipment and controls or for delays to the chiller system start- up caused by Districts'-furnished equipment supplied by the engine manufacturer. As part of this item, certain testing of equipment supplied by the engine manufacturer, and hydronic balancing associated with chiller start-up, will be performed by the Districts at a later date. The Districts will also accept the engine exhaust piping gaskets provided by the contractor, provided no leaks in the exhaust system occur within the contract warranty period. Item 3, in the amount of $2,971.00, is for relocating the 6-inch cooling water return (CWR) to the Chiller No. 2 connection at the 8-inch plant chilled water supply line to a position downstream of the 6-inch cooling water supply (CWS) from the Chiller No. 1 connection at the 8-inch main. The 6-inch CWR line was incorrectly shown upstream of the 6-inch CWS line on the contract drawings. Item 4, a credit in the amount of $3,062.00, is for deleting the demolition of hot water piping in tunnels. The pipe cannot be removed at this time as it is needed to operate existing equipment which will not be taken off-line until after completion of engine emission testing. Item 5, in the amount of $784.00, is for the temporary wiring of frequency relays to provide protection for the generators against automatic reclosure of Southern California Edison (SCE) incoming service breakers after power outages caused by SCE. Damage could occur to the generators if they are not synchronized properly with the incoming service provided by SCE. Additional -4- November 10, 1993 relays are being designed to provide permanent protection and these will be installed in the future under a separate contract. Item 6, in the amount of $3,498.00, is for cleaning debris out of two chiller cooling water heat exchangers. Plant water is used to provide cooling in these exchangers. Failure of Districts' plant water strainers allowed debris to enter and clog the exchangers. Item 7, in the amount of $3,281.00, is for providing a column to support stairs that provide access to the heating, ventilating and air-conditioning room. This support column was not shown in the contract documents. Item 8, a no-cost item, revises the contractor's warranty period for equipment provided by the contractor on the project and separates it from the engines supplied by Cooper for which a resolution is yet to be determined. The Districts acknowledged in Change Order No. 18, Item 1, that the start-up of the facility could have been successfully completed by January 18, 1993 had delays caused by deficiencies in equipment supplied by the engine manufacturer, Cooper Industries, not occurred. As a consequence of these delays, warranties on equipment supplied by the contractor's equipment vendors will expire before the and of the normal warranty period required in the General Provisions, Sections 4-9 and 4-33 of the Contract documents. The normal one-year warranty would have otherwise begun on June 28, 1993, the date the five-day test was completed and the facility placed into service. This item revises the warranty for equipment supplied by the contractor to start on January 18, 1993 and end on January 18, 1994. Except for Items 2, 3, 6, 7 and 8, the changes described above would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. Item 6 is for cost required to repair problems caused by complications in the operation of the plant water system. Items 2 and 8 include costs associated with correcting defective equipment supplied by the engine manufacturer. Item 7 is for an omission. Item 3 is for replaced work. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $1,7701,921.00 with 394 calendar days time extension. This represents an increase of 11% over the original contract amount. Of this amount, 3% represents the cost of correcting deficiencies in the gas-driven engines and related equipment which were improperly manufactured and prepared for storage by the engine manufacturer, which has been previously reported to the Directors. The bonus in Item 1 accounts for 1 %. -5- November 10, 1993 Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 26 for a net addition of $173,975.00 and 59 calendar days to the contract with Hunter Corporation. 9(d): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO, 1 FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-42-2. Job No. P2-42-2 is a $14.5 million contract to expand the secondary treatment capacity at Plant No. 2 by lengthening the clarifiers and installing other improvements. This project will increase the secondary capacity from 75 million gallons per day (mgd) to 90 mgd. The plans and specifications were prepared by John Carollo Engineers and the construction contract was awarded in April 1993 to Margate Construction Inc. Item 1, a credit of $54,000.00, deletes the Contractor's "All Risk" Insurance requirement. The insurance was a separate deletable bid item within the contract. Counsel recommended deleting Contractor-furnished insurance and providing Districts'-furnished insurance in accordance with a previously approved Board policy for a Master Course of Construction Program, at a cost savings to the Districts estimated to be $16,250.00. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for a deduction of $54,000.00 from the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. 9(e): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR PRIORITY PROJECTS ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1 . JOB NO. P1-38-2. Job No. P1-38-2, Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1 provides for replacement of all sluice and slide gates within the existing Metering and Diversion Structure, new foul air scrubbers at Headworks No. 2, modifications to existing Primary Sedimentation Basins, and other miscellaneous facilities and work items. The design for this $3.3 million project was performed by John Carollo Engineers and the construction contract was awarded in June 1993 to Pascal and Ludwig Engineers. Item 1, a credit of $13,600.00, deletes the Contractor's Builder's "All Risk" Insurance requirement. The Districts' cost to provide this insurance under the Master Course of Construction Program is $4,841.00. The Districts realize a savings of $8,759.00 by providing the insurance. -6- November 10, 1993 Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for a deduction of $13,600.00 from the contract with Pascal and Ludwig Engineers. 9(f): AUTHORIZING SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO, 1 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CH2M HILL FOR PREPARATION OF A STUDY TO REVIEW THE SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISITION (SCADA) SYSTEM TO DETERMINE PRESENT AND FUTURE NEEDS RE EXPANSION OF EXISTING COMPUTERIZED MONITORING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AT PLANTS 1 AND 2. JOB NO, J-31. In 1989, the Districts approved a professional services agreement for preparation of plans and specifications for installation of a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System (SCADA), in accordance with the 1989 Master Plan. A construction contract awarded in 1991 and now nearly complete, provided for installation of monitors throughout the plants but did not include control provisions. Last April, the Boards approved a professional services agreement (Job No. J-31) with the engineering consulting firm of CH2M Hill to provide additional work to complete the SCADA system, including configuration of approximately 31 existing programmable controllers, a new control system for the Ocean Outfall Booster Station, development of programming standards and graphic screens for the processes. Staff has determined that it may be advantageous to incorporate additional control functions in the existing SCADA system. CH2M Hill has advised that if these options are considered, they should best be done now, prior to final design and installation of the J-31 work. Staff is therefore recommending that the Directors consider an addendum to the CH2M Hill Professional Services Agreement to perform a needs assessment to examine these issues prior to completing the work on Job No. J-31. Therefore, staff recommends the following items be added to the scope of work: 1) Provide systems implementation recommendations. 2) Provide a discussion of control vs monitoring and determine the best method of implementing the system for the Districts. -7- November 10, 1993 Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the addendum will be presented to the Boards for consideration. 9(g): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PURCHASE ORDER NO. 59559 TO TEAM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC. RE EMISSIONS TESTING OF FLARES AT PLANTS NOS 1 AND 2. Three waste-gas flares are installed at both plants for burning excess digester gas. In accordance with the operating permit conditions imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), the Districts are required to source test the flares to ensure that the emissions are within the limits allowed by the permit. TEAM Environmental Services, Inc. (TEAM), an independent source testing company located in San Marcos, California, was selected to assist the Districts in conducting the emission testing. The Districts originally issued TEAM a purchase order to conduct the emission testing for the amount of $13,350. Due to unforeseen circumstances experienced by TEAM while conducting the test and a change in the scope of the work, a considerable amount of extra effort was required to complete the required testing. The $16,481.44 increase to the original contract amount with TEAM occurred due to delays in performing the source tests, the need for additional equipment to perform the tests, and the use of a more expensive state-approved method over a federally-approved method in order to get double usage of the data for the Districts' Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB 2588) report update. The original contract amount was based on two days of testing at both plants. However, delays at the plants caused by conditions not known at the time of TEAM's cost proposal, extended the test program over four-and-one-half days. The delays at both plants resulted in the additional cost of $5,850.00 because sample ports at Plant No. 2's flare were corroded closed and could not be opened for over six hours. The Districts' man lifts and the equipment necessary to open the sample ports were not readily available since this problem was not evident prior to the TEAM sampling crew arriving at the plant. Further, wide temperature swings at the flare stacks, at both plants, prevented the source testing engineer from obtaining stabilized readings. This was not anticipated before the testing and was later determined to be a design flaw, which has since been corrected. This caused the TEAM sampling crew to return twice to repeat the sampling procedures. An additional cost of $4,895.44 was incurred due to the use of a water- cooled sampling probe which was used due to the extremely high temperatures encountered at the flare stacks at both plants. This was not anticipated before the testing and was later determined to be a design flaw, which has since been -8- November 10, 1993 corrected. Additional labor and expense were required to prepare the sampling probe and conduct the test because TEAM's original cost proposal was based on a non-water-cooled sampling probe. Additional time was also needed to prepare the water-cooled sampling probe and involved sending the TEAM personnel back to their home office, which is located in San Marcos, California, to retrieve and prepare the probe; and to ensure that a sufficient supply of chilled water was available for the safety of personnel and equipment. A major concern was the possibility of pressure build-up in the water jacket if the circulated water was not sufficiently cooled. An additional cost of $5,736.00 was incurred as a result of an expanded scope of required testing and reporting. In order for the Districts to concurrently satisfy the AB 2588 report updates, SCAOMD required the Districts to use California Air Resources Board (CARE) Method 430 for the analysis of aldehydes. The original contract with TEAM was based on EPA Method TO-11. CARB Method 430 requires additional preparation of the sampling devices and additional laboratory analytical costs. Further, inaccuracy of the digester gas flow readings (which were determined to require temperature and pressure compensation) required additional time to reevaluate the test results to ensure accurate reporting of emissions. Staff recommends authorization to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 59559 to TEAM Environmental Services, Inc., authorizing an increase from $13,350.00 to a total amount not to exceed $29,831 .44 for the above- described additional work. SIN: AUTHORIZING EXTENSION OF TWO TEMPORARY SPECIFIC TERM EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS PERTAINING TO RESEARCH BEING CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO GRANTS FROM NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE. The Molecular Microbiology section of the Districts' Laboratory is involved with research and development of more reliable and sensitive methods to detect pathogenic bacteria, viruses and protozoans in water in order to better protect public health. The major focus of the work is the development of methods which will increase sensitivity and specificity in environmental monitoring of marine and fresh water. These new technologies may be the basis of future regulatory considerations and standard testing methods. Much of the research is supported by two grants from the National Water Research Institute. To obtain the goals stated within these grants and support other Districts' projects during the past year, two temporary technical support -9- November 10, 1993 personnel were hired by utilizing standard Specific Term Employment Agreements. These individuals, Fred Bonilla and Bich Tran, play a major role in conducting this research. However, their contracts will expire November 14, 1993 and staff recommends that their temporary contracts be extended for one-year at the same $13.75 hourly rate as the past year. It would take up to six months to train new employees and have them reach a satisfactory level of proficiency. November's salary (covering the 15th-30th) and December's will be paid from NWRI grant WO-91-01. The salary for both technicians for this time period will be $6,875 and is covered in full by this grant. Salary for the remaining ten and one-half months, through November 14, 1994, will be covered in part by NWRI grant HR-92-06 in the amount of $28,000 will be provided from this grant. Therefore, the NWRI will fund a total of $34,875 and the Districts $20,125 of the $55,000 total required to support these positions for the period November 15, 1993 through November 14, 1994. Staff recommends that the Boards authorize the General Manager to execute new one-year Specific Term Employment Agreements with Fred Bonilla and Bich Tran for the continuation of the temporary technical support in the maximum amount of $27,500 each for the period November 15, 1993 through November 14, 1994. 9(i): HOME INSURANCE COMPANY V. BRINDERSON CORPORATION AND COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY. The Districts have recently received a summons and complaint filed by Home Insurance Company, one of the liability insurance carriers for Brinderson Corporation, the engine installation contractor for the Plant No. 2 Central Power Generation System. The Districts have been named in this action which seeks declaratory relief from the Court interpreting the insurance policy which Home issued for Brinderson relative to liability exposure on their construction projects. Home Insurance has basically denied coverage to Brinderson, saying that the claim of our Districts is not within the scope of coverage for the policy, and therefore, has been essentially refusing to defend, much less indemnify Brinderson. The Districts are named as a party as being essential to a final determination of the issues, since we have filed a formal claim against Brinderson. The Districts will want to actively participate in this lawsuit, because it is in our interest to have access to several million dollars in coverage through this policy of insurance, in the event Brinderson is otherwise unable to pay the costs of the engine investigation and rehabilitation. -10- November 10, 1993 It is recommended that the matter be referred to the office of General Counsel for representation and defense of the Districts' interests. 9(j): RATIFY STAFF'S ACTIONS RE ISSUANCE OF PURCHASE ORDER NO, 64943 RE EMERGENCY REPAIRS TO THE PLANT NO. 2 LOW PRESSURE GAS HOLDER (SPECIFICATION NO. R-042). Digester gas is a byproduct of the sewage treatment process. This gas is collected in the space at the top of the digester domes and is then conveyed to a low-pressure gas holder. From there, the gas is compressed and transported throughout the plants for use as a fuel for the Central Power Generation engines and to heat boilers. We have experienced a failure to the rubber bladder inside the low pressure holder at Plant No. 2. Initial attempts to repair this ten-year old bladder were not successful and, as a result, staff contacted three outside firms who specialize in the repairs to bladders of this type. One firm, Chicago Bridge and Iron (NACON), declined to bid. Matrix Services, Inc. bid $51,082.00 and PDM bid $93,877.00 for the complete replacement of the bladder and all internal hardware. Staff believed that emergency repairs were necessary because our Operations staff was being impacted by causing them to have to operate the gas- handling system manually and without appropriate safety or shutdown capabilities. In addition, it was causing us to vent odorous gas into the atmosphere. After reviewing the situation with the Joint Chairman and obtaining his authorization, staff ordered the work done in accordance with the Districts' procurement regulations. In accordance with the purchasing procedures staff is requesting ratification of this emergency action of issuing Purchase Order No. 64943 to Matrix Services, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $60,346.00, plus applicable sales tax, for Emergency Repairs to Plant No. 2 Low Pressure Gas Holder (Specification No. R-042). DISTRICTS 3 AND 11 9(k): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO 1 FOR SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT N0. 111L• Contract No. 11-17-1, Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage Improvements, was designed by John Carollo Engineers and is being constructed -11- November 10, 1993 by Colich and Sons. This current project consists of a new pumping station that connects to a new 48-inch reinforced concrete pipe sewer and a 36-inch ductile iron pipe force main in the City of Huntington Beach. Portions of the sewer pipe will be tunneled under major intersections to minimize disruption of traffic. This change order consists of one item of deleted work which does not affect the original contract time and provides a net deduction of $27,625.00 from the contract. Item 1, a credit of $27,625.00, deletes the Contractor's "All Risk" Insurance requirement. The insurance was a separate deletable bid item within the contract. Counsel recommends deleting the contractor-furnished insurance and substituting coverage under the Districts' Master Course of Construction Program at a $17,662.00 cost savings to the Districts. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for a deduction of $27,625.00 from the contract with Colich and Sons. Bill: APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS. CONTRACT NO, 11-17. In June 1989, the Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers (JCE) for preparation of a project report for the Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17. In September 1990, the Directors approved Addendum No. 1 which authorized preparation of final design, plans and specifications, and provided for construction support services for the pump station and influent and effluent pipe lines. The design, which is complete, has taken far longer than originally envisioned, and JCE has asked that savings from funds originally allocated for subcontractors and not expended be transferred to the direct labor category to cover additional expenses incurred because of the delays in job completion. There is no change in the maximum authorization of $694,121 .00, as follows: -12- November 10, 1993 Proposed Existing Proposed Amended Agreement Addn, No. 2 Aareement Direct Labor, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 153%1, not to exceed $550,991.00 $1,976.67 $552,967.67 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 Subconsultants Fees, notto exceed 70,295.00 (1,976.67) 68,318.33 Fixed Profit 69,835.00 0.00 69,835.00 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed 5694.121.00 9 0.00 $694.121.00 The Director of Engineering recommends the action appearing on the agenda adopting a resolution approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design of Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, providing for a reallocation of costs at no change in the total authorized contract amount of $694,121.00. A copy of the resolution is attached with the supporting agenda documents. DISTRICT 5 9(m(: AUTHORIZING GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR TRANSFORMER PAD AT CRYSTAL COVE PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO. 5-36. In May 1993, the Directors awarded the construction contract for Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, to Schuler Engineering Corporation. This site requires an electrical transformer to be owned, operated and maintained by Southern California Edison Company for providing electrical power to the station. The 100' x 60' pump station site was granted in fee to County Sanitation District No. 5 as part of an agreement for exchange of property with The Irvine Company which the Directors approved in December 1991 . The action appearing on the agenda is to authorize the Chairman and Secretary to execute a Grant of Easement at the Crystal Cove Pump Station site to Southern California Edison Company, at no cost, for an electrical transformer pad, approximately 14 feet long by 14 feet wide, in a form acceptable to the Districts' General Counsel and Southern California Edison Company. -13- November 10, 1993 11: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FISCAL POLICY/EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on October 20, 1993 and the Executive Committee met on October 27, 1993. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on their deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 12: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES ESTABLISHING SOURCE CONTROL FEES, ADMINISTRATIVE FEES. NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES. At their October 13, 1993 meeting, the Boards considered reports (copy enclosed with Directors supporting agenda material) and introduced and conducted the first reading on these proposed ordinances to adjust existing fee schedules for the specified charges to cover current costs, and fixed November 10, 1993 for a hearing on said ordinances. The actions appearing on the agenda are to conduct the second reading and public hearing, and consideration of adoption of the proposed ordinances. 13: PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF ORDINANCES ESTABLISHING CHARGES FOR USE OF DISTRICTS FACILITIES BY INDUSTRIAL USERS AND WASTEHAULERS. At their October 13, 1993 meeting, the Boards considered reports (copy enclosed with Directors supporting agenda material) and introduced and conducted the first reading on these proposed ordinances that adjust the wastehauler charges to reflect current costs and incorporate them with the existing ordinances' provisions for charges to industrial waste dischargers to the sewerage system, and fixed November 10, 1993 for a hearing on said ordinances. The proposed ordinances do not adjust the existing industrial waste discharge user fees. The actions appearing on the agenda are to conduct the second reading and public hearing, and consideration of adoption of the proposed ordinances. 14: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CONSERVATION. RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE. The Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee met on October 28, 1993. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on the Committee's deliberations and actions. -14- November 10, 1993 15: JOINT CHAIRMAN'S TERM AND COMPENSATION. Joint Chairman Mahoney has agendized a review of the Joint Chairman's term at the request of Director Kerry at the October Board meeting. Mr. Mahoney has also agendized the matter of the Joint Chairman's compensation for consideration by the Boards. Included with the Directors supporting agenda material is information pertaining to these matters. 16: AWARD PHASE 1 WASTEHAULER DUMPING FACILITIES MODIFICATIONS, JOB NO. P1-46-1 . At their October 13, 1993 meeting, the Directors authorized the General Manager to solicit bids and award a contract to the low bidder in an amount not to exceed $200,000.00 for construction of Phase 1 Wastehauler Pumping Facilities, Job No. P1-46-1. On November 2, 1993, five bids were received for the construction of Phase 1 Wastehauler Dumping Facilities Modifications, Job No. P7-46-1 . The low bid received was greater than the authorized amount. The bids ranged from a high of $493,308.00 to a low of $248,953.00 submitted by Dorado Enterprises Inc. The bid was higher than the engineer's estimate of $200,000.00 because of a late addition of a flushing system to the plans and specifications to help eliminate clogging of the systems and reduce odors. Staff recommends award to Dorado Enterprises Inc. for their low bid of $248,953.00. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material. 17: ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1993. On October 20, 1993, the Fiscal Policy Committee met with representatives of the Districts' independent audit firm, KPMG Peat Marwick, to review the results of their audit of the Districts' accounting records for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1993. (See Report of Fiscal Policy Committee dated October 20, 1993 included with Report of Executive Committee dated October 27, 1993, Agenda Item No. 11(a) above.) The auditors have mailed copies of their report to Directors under separate cover. The action appearing on the agenda is to receive, file and approve the report. Representatives of KPMG Peat Marwick will attend the meeting to answer any questions. -15- November 10, 1993 18: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. DISTRICTS 6. 7 AND 14 32: APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RE BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR, FROM FAIRVIEW ROAD TO PLANT NO. 1. CONTRACT NO, 14-1-1A. Since the formation of County Sanitation District No. 14, Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 have been working toward the completion of a joint sewage conveyance system which will deliver wastewater from the communities of Irvine, Costa Mesa and Santa Ana to Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. In December 1986, the Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of a Project Report for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-1A, from the Main Street Pump Station located in the John Wayne Airport clear zone, to Reclamation Plant No. 1. The agreement was subsequently modified to include design, construction and other services. In accordance with that agreement, four of six construction contracts (from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Main Street to Bristol Street, and two in the vicinity of the Santa Ana River) have been completed. The fifth of six contracts land the last contract on the Baker-Gisler Intercepter) is now ready for bidding. The two remaining projects include this contract—the reach from Fairview Road to the Greenville-Banning Channel, and a future District No. 6 collector extending southerly in Fairview road from the Paularino channel (just south of Baker Street) to Wilson Street—are scheduled for construction in 1996. Contract No. 14-1-1A includes the construction of a 90-inch reinforced concrete pipe sewer IRCP), between Fairview Road at Baker Street and the Santa Ana River (approximately 10,500 feet) and approximately 760 feet of 6 feet by 8 feet RC box sewer through Mesa Verde Country Club. Within the above reach, two private easements have been acquired after years of negotiation, and a revised (Supplement No. 2) Environmental Impact Report has been prepared. One -16- November 10, 1993 easement is through the Sanwa Bank property site and the other is for the construction of the reinforced concrete box (equivalent in size to the 90-inch RCP) within the Mesa Verde Country Club and Golf Course, immediately south of Gisler Avenue and east of the Santa Ana River. The Settlement and Release Agreement for the acquisition of the Mesa Verde Country Club easement was fully executed in March 1993. For the Sanwa Bank property easement, a revised Stipulation for Entry of Judgment and Judgment was prepared by Districts' counsel and submitted in September 1993 to the Superior Court of California for a judgment in condemnation. (If the settlement agreement with Sanwa is delayed, the project will be delayed.) Settlement agreements with both Sanwa Bank and Mesa Verde Country Club dictate strict scheduling window periods for construction that the Districts must comply with. A penalty and liquidated damages clause has been included to accomplish this goal. Staff is attempting to minimize any potential conflicts by seeking an early advertisement and construction of the pipelines. Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Contract No. 14-1-1A, subject to final acquisition of the Sanwa easement. The bid date is tentatively set for December 14, 1993. The engineer's estimate is $11,000,000. J a ylves er neral pager JWS:jt -17- MANAGERS AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127• 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92 728-81 2 7 Telephone:(714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS NOVEMBER 10, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 Written communication has been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said communication: (4) (a) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to receive and file written communication from the President of the Costa Mesa Sanitary District re appointment of James A. Wahner as alternate Director for James Ferryman in District No. 1 for the meeting of November 10, 1993, only. REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN 1 1 -10-93 1 ) Upcoming Meetings A. Fiscal Policy Committee - The Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to meet Wednesday. November 17th. at 5:30 p.m. B. Joint Works Selection Committee - The Joint Works Selection Committee is scheduled to meet on Thursday. November 18th. at 7:30 a.m. C. Personnel Committee - The Personnel Committee is scheduled to meet on Thursday. November 18, at 5:30 p.m. D. Special Ad Hoc Committee - Re Service to Outside Areas. The Special Ad Hoc Committee is scheduled to meet on Tuesday. November 23rd. at 5:30 p.m. E. Executive Committee - The Executive Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday. December 1 st. at 5:30 p.m. Invite two of the following Directors to attend and participate in the discussions: Miguel Pulido and Thomas Saltarelli hU Sans—-on Jim Silva - End of Report - Attachment wpdoc\g m\jcrpts93\jc 1 1 .01 MEETING DA-E November 10, 1993 TIME 7:30 p.m. DISTRICTS 1 ,2,3,5,6,7, 11 , 13 S 14 40 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS ILUTiI .......MIMMI818RN ... lk A- IBEYERI ..... .. BARREIr.... IBEYES$ . . . . . . BARRERA ... IDENES) ......... BELL ......... (�IRf�'i'ZIPONTIO .. .. . .�mrraimwSALTAREL .... IFORSYTIGHNAH ...... BROWN ....... — INEINEM I ... STANTO ..... L (S COTT) ..AM ... CATLINmum ....... _ ISTEINERI ..... STANTON ..... ,f ISCOTT) ......... COX .. IDEHAYI ......... COX ......... _ DISTRICT 2 ISANSONEI ....... DEBAY ....... — ISCOTR . ..... COLLINS ...... (NELSON) ........ 'SHANK ...... _ IGULLD(SONI . .. WE DAA ..... . . (RICE( ........... IBEYER) ...... BAIIREM .... i _ WENES) ...... BELL .... ... .. �- IMAHONEY) ...... FLORA — (MCCLANAHANI CATLIN ..... .B/ IBROWN) ........ ONFFW ....... — (FLORAI ...... MAHONEY . .... y IWEDAA) ........ OULLMSON ....r (EMENRODE) .. MORENO,MARIA �_ IWARD) ......... HAMMOND ..... IPARKERI ..... NELSON . .. ... L loom ........... HART ........JS _ IDALY) ..... . . PICKLER ... . .. _V0 �_ (AGEI ........... KERRY........ — (Lun) ..... .. PIIMSs .... ... . fL (SAVA) .......... ISTEINERI ..... STANTON . . ... . BUCKARDSONI .... W12 .ON........ _ ISINGERI ...... ZLAKET ... . ... � (RAM) ......... MW HEY ..... (UNNI ........... MINER ........ _ DISTRICT 3 IECKENRODEI ..... MORENO.MARK — IMARTINEZI ... SAHEN ....... (MUDD) ......... MORENO.TED .. — (NELSON) ..... Bill ...... (PAHKERI ........ NELSON .. ... . (FORSYMEI ... BROWN ....... (DUNLAP) ........ PARKER. .. .... G&CLANAHANI CATLIN ....... (DALY( .......... PIMUR ....... — ISCOTTI ...... COLLWB ...... IPUCKETTI . .... PMTIOUS .....JL _ IRICO ........GIWS ....... (MLTARELLII ..... PUCKETT......� (MAHOMEY) ... ROM.. ...... (LUTZ) . ......... ROM" .......� (MOWN) ..... GRIFFIN ....... Se (LUTO .......... BpILAR!!M .. — (AGE) ........ KERRY........ �- (PONTK)US) ...... SALTAREW...._� — IRICXAROSONI LUE .. . .. �!L, (OEMY) ......... SAPHAI ..... T IUNNI ........ MINER ........ IMA"NIND ...... MRN ....... _ (DALY) ....... PICKLER ...... .., (ROSITAILLE) ...... SILVA ........ IROBITAILLEI . . . SILVA ...... �_ IZIAKETI ........ SINGER .......JL — 12lAKED .. SINGER .....:: ISTEINTO ........ STANTON ...... G _ (STEINERI .. .. STANTON ... (STANONI .... (BATES) ... .. SYLVIA ..... (MILLER) ......... SWAN ........ (BATES) ......... DISTRICT 5 IPEMYISCXEAFERI ZHAYI ... CO... X .. r IOULLIUONI ... ... WED AA ....... — — (ROBFTAILLE) ...... WWOIML ..... BAY) ...... 9ANSONE ..... yy — ISTANTON) .... STEINER ...... L (SINGER(......... 2LAKET.......Je — rl DISTRICT B STAW OTHERS (PERRY) ...... WAHNER .... SYLVESTER. � WOODRUFF ICOX) ........ HART ...... BROWN ... — ANWAR ... 0 ISTANTONI .... STMER .... ANDERSON . _ DONA .... — CLAWSON . mmme . •ri< DISTRICT 7 DAWES....JG MHENER.. — (WARD) ...... HAMMOND ... GORCZ CA . MUM .. ISCHEAFER) ... WANNER .....: HODGES .. HUM .. IBEYERI ...... MRREM .... HODGES . .. -0 HUNT .... — (SANSONE) .... DENY .. KYLE "' KNOIT — IPULID01 ...... MORENO,lED .. CINDER . ... ✓ LEE ......NELL — LYNCH (SALTARELLR .. PUCKETT. . .... 7 ...... � LINDSTROM (STANTON) .... STEINER .. . ... � OOTENS... MAW .... DISTRICT 11 SIMPSON .. lk STONE .... 3921 IROBITAILLEI ... WWW1lLL ..... STREVINCEN .. . Y, WAGON YOUNG ..: ISILVA) ....... LEIPZIG ....... WINSOT. . . JG YOUNG . WINSOR .. . ! �q.#_Q ISTEINEAI . . .. . STANTON ..... .� 7��/,/��'�[fIR! NDISTRICT WEDAAJ 13.. GULLIXSON .... `/^1"u �� y��1 ZDU LAP) ... .. PARKER....... � LY( .... ER .... ISTANTOM NI .... STEINER ...... . e 11_ ✓�`.� �q� ��p//rydL� DISTRICT 14 A*rt/L"^9 . (MILLER) ... ... SWAN . .... . . . WO' IPUCKETTI .... POWRA .. . .. — IWARD; ...... HARKEN .. (STANTON) .... HAMMOND ... ^,/ ��p� MMS IBTANT .. .. STEINER .... . �/✓"' �`— ]/18A9 REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. DATE: /D %.3 AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) D 4 , HOME ADDRESS: L/0 s (ti/ 3 � Q NUM ERER S G ELF - , G�S;7 CITY ZIP CODE TELEPHONE: REPRESENTING: li( D I VAL A C S _ OAM 0iZA ON F28A PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY NOVEMBER 10, 1993 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATIONFIRM Please Print Please Print C l 1J a - oCSD sa AvlO L, 1i4pE Loci1L L. ELceJ Al CSaJc(So( c -3 t ocso p � 615D /sol GYniN OMa+ / c50ac juoe Lceq4-,l so/ 0 a cin /un io b KNNEL G✓ ic Sc I SJoG fin. io. - /?i. C.5 C. UrlioN or esoac U,vion. So/ c\c ltnia �.i� IK �, aSAoc .u; `.w Sol o O 0 ,-o �k e dCS Un1i of oc 5 oG S cv c 6 q S-a I. 5 CSo 5� l G(¢H ocsp Lo«I Sol 1-/IprLf ��e6— OCsD L-vci4-L-5-19 f PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM Please Print Please Print elC G f •/?�� 0050 CS Dec csvoc Pow 50 ! �Trr l4 orowj C Sly(I(f S'elI f�a csvoc sol yh �sr�p L,4 csao M cs no c 9 a �C C o � SO D zz5 S oG O i , 5'0 Cty✓k/ C�vocr-C� (<< o S`1�"a'� Sa�p(PjA-� KP"1G- (��a7 Maia.ic� po-&o- CS Doc �1PM� c�RG�+rza-'�. o�J 11/10/93 JOINT BOARD MEETING #3 - Appointment of Chairman pro tern for District No. 3 PK: We do need to appoint a Chairman pro tern for District 3. JC: We need a Chairman pro tem for District 3 for this evening. Entertain a motion. Director Kerry was appointed District No. 3 Chairman pro tem. #5 - Public Comments JC: Anyone in the audience that would like to address the Boards of Directors may do so. I have one person wishing to speak - David L. Hamilton. Policy of the Board is to limit the speakers to five minutes. David Hamilton: Good evening Honorable Board Members. I am David Hamilton from IUOE Local 501 Operating Engineers. I am here tonight on behalf of our union members who are your employees and in most cases your constituents. These are not your average run-of-the-mill employees. These are your Number 1 awarding winning employees. We would like to congratulate the Districts and this Board for fine achievements on winning the United States Environmental Protection Agency 1993 National Award for Outstanding Operating and Maintenance. These people work very hard and put forth an excellent effort for you. They keep the Sanitation District functioning properly and keep it at a level that should make management and this Board extremely proud of their effort. Unfortunately these employees are being told there is no retribution, no cost of living adjustment that is, for that extended effort that they have given. Your current offer of zero is not conducive to the superlative performance of these people. If this is the proposal of this Honorable Board, then we ask you to call an emergency session and reconsider. It is not acceptable to us. Thank you very much. #6W - Joint Chairman's Report JC: Upcoming Meetings: We have a Fiscal Policy Committee meeting scheduled for Wednesday, November 17th, at 5:30 p.m. Joint Works Selection Committee scheduled for Thursday, November 18th, -1- at 7:30 a.m. Personnel Committee is scheduled to meet on Thursday, November 18th, at 5:30 p.m. Special Ad Hoc Committee re Service to Outside Areas is scheduled to meet on Tuesday, November 23rd, at 5:30 p.m. Normally we don't have an Executive Committee meeting in December but we are scheduling one for Wednesday, December 1st, at 5:30 p.m. That is tentative; there is a possibility it may change. I would like to invite Phil Sansone and Jim Silva. #61c1 - Report of the General Counsel TLW: There were two items that were put into your agenda packages tonight. They do not require action. They were information only. One is a very brief notation that the State Legislature and now the Governor has signed three bills that encompass a considerable number of changes in the Ralph M. Brown Act. They will not become effective until April 1 based on the request and plea of the League of California Cities and CASA and AQUA ?? to allow everyone to get geared up and be able to better prepare. Each of you will probably be hearing about this from your city. I will be getting out to you a more detailed report as to how it will have an impact on these Districts probably by the next board meeting. The second item in there is the goldenrod sheet and that is an informational item. A few months ago the Boards directed, as a condition of a change order, that we look into whether the Districts' consulting design engineer may have been at fault because of the magnitude of the change order. I have tried to detail it there. In summary we gathered together all of the data and records from the Engineering department and the consulting engineers including the soils reports. Based thereon it is my opinion that there is simply no basis to lay fault at the feet of the design engineer. It would truly vary irregular soil conditions and absent our going out and putting a pothole every 5 or 10 feet for the whole length of the pipe before the construction. There is no way it would have been discovered and it caused a great deal of difficulty for the contractor. We ran into a peat condition and those of you that are familiar with that know that it is almost unmanageable. You can't get hard base and settlement. The contractor had to do a lot of extra work. The soils report, while it did indicate that there were some concerns over soil that had to be watched for, there was certainly nothing that would show that there was a fault on the part of the engineer. On that basis we don't see how the Districts could successfully prosecute any action -2- to recover against them. #12(a) Verbal Report of General Counsel re proposed Ordinances Establishing Source Control Fees. Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges TLW: The agendas before each of the nine Districts are ordinances which are here for a second reading. They were all introduced in accordance with procedures at your last monthly regular meeting. They are the ordinances which are set forth in the staff report making the adjustments relative to the source control, administrative and wastehauler fees. There have been no changes in the ordinances since they were first introduced, and the staff report has been provided. That is the staff report that was dated September 15th and prepared by the Source Control Division. #13(a) Verbal Report of General Counsel re proposed Ordinances. Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers TLW: This ordinance is here before you as the second reading, having been introduced at your last regular board meeting. The ordinance takes care of a few clerical corrections on an existing ordinance and also provides as set forth in the staff report for an adjustment in the annual fees relative to the industrial dischargers and the wastehauler dischargers. There are no changes to the ordinances as originally introduced. #14 Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee report Director Catlin: If anyone has not read that report carefully I recommend that they do. It is one of the most imaginative projects from our Board that is to bring our secondary effluent to ---- basin which would make a great deal of difference in our use of water. That is a very interesting project. #15 Term and Compensation for the post of Joint Chairman JC: There are two items here. The first item we will discuss is the term limitations for the Joint Chairman's position. At the last meeting Director Kerry asked that this matter be agendized so I will ask Director Kerry if you would like to make comments and then we will proceed to discuss and act upon this item.. Director Kerry: I feel that this issue is something important to all of us. We need to have as many experienced people as possible on this board. Being Joint Chair is a very responsible position and truly gives anyone in that position a real insight as to the whole working of this board. I think that two years is ample amount of time and it should be shared and passed on to the other members who haven't had the -3- opportunity to be in that position. The more people we have on this board that are experienced in sitting in that position, I believe that will bring us more value to this Board and for decisions made here. I would respectfully ask and encourage anyone, I know we have two past Joint Chairs here and maybe they would like to share their thoughts. Director Griffin: First, I would like to get a clarification and make sure we understand what the motion would be. Director Kerry: I would make a motion that the term limit of the Joint Chairman be limited to two consecutive years. Moved, seconded. Director Stanton: Point of information. That would not preclude someone who goes off after two consecutive terms and sits off a couple of years, and then if the bodies so consented that person may come back. Director Kerry: That is correct. Director Griffin: First of all, as sitting as the past Joint Chairman approximately 6 to 8 years ago, I learned and gained a great deal from the past Joint Chairmen that sat on the Board at that time. Unfortunately, we have lost a number of them in recent years. I think that it is a great benefit to this organization when in fact we do have past Joint Chairmen sitting on the Board carrying through for continuity and carrying information and knowledge that has been discussed over a number of years. I would like to make it real clear that this is in my opinion and never has been an issue of Bill Mahoney. I support Bill Mahoney. He has my support 110%. There is absolutely no question in my mind that Bill has done a great job and I am proud of this organization for efforts like Bill's. I do feel though, that having a two-year term provision gives us as a Joint Board, whether you are a new member or one that has been here for a great while, a chance to really think about the issues in a very specific timeframe when it comes up. I think it is beneficial. I think the continuity as I mentioned is particularly rewarding and I think it carries on the information that is an imperative base I think which we benefit. There is another thing that is happening to all of us. That is our local jurisdictions, ours' as a matter of fact, going with term limits and it is making it more and more difficult for local city officials to in fact get in and go through a period of learning in this organization and ultimately then having an opportunity to serve in a leadership -4- capacity. In a way we are all getting squeezed and I think that has some relative merit. Unfortunately we have some city councils where when they change mayorship each year, the mayor changes the representation. We literally have some cities that have taken themselves out of any opportunity of having their leadership be here with us year in and year out and be a possible candidate for Joint Chair. I think it is a good policy to have these specifics in writing. We all can understand it. I support it and hope that you will take it under consideration. Director Moreno: If this would pass, would that affect basically the two years the current Chair has served or could the current Chair serve two more terms? JC: I guarantee you this Chair won't. I will make the statement publicly - I won't be running again for Chair. Director Catlin: When I first got the job as Joint Chair, as you recall, I was Vice Chairman and Ron Hoesterey suddenly changed his residency and I became the Chair without very much experience, although I had been here for some years. I did find out one thing that was very important. We have something like six or seven different Committees and it is our job to start -------------- I found out how valuable Past Joint Chairmen were. When I served, there were five Past Joint Chairmen and with that experience I believe I would have to agree with Don that we need a broader experience. You on the Executive Committee realize that and I speak for them. Now, Bill and I are very close friends. He lives in La Habra and we drove down together and that ability to talk outside the Brown Act --------. Director Collins: I would also like to add that I don't feel this is a Mahoney issue at all. I don't even like two term limits as a general rule. I don't think they are productive. I do believe that this specific instance of leadership role of this organization for many of the same reasons that Director Griffin has brought out, that it would be appropriate and I will support the motion on that basis. However, I do have a concern that perhaps General Counsel can answer. We are going to approve a concept here now. We've had a couple of questions from a couple of Directors about is this going to be "grandfathered in", is this going to be dealing with two consecutive terms and come back after you do two terms later on. There's going to be a lot of details much of which is in the two term limits that* we've seen at some of the cities. Will we have the opportunity if we approve it in concept to see the written word next meeting? Will this be a two vote ordinance similar to what we have with the cities? TLW: First of all, it won't be an ordinance. We will probably do it by resolution. I would like to formalize it and get it in writing. I don't have it in writing before you tonight obviously so the answer I think is predetermined "Yes" that I would bring it -5- back. Primarily though until I know exactly what is fundamentally decided, Director Moreno's question was certainly good. A little tougher question is you elect a Chairman, we have a two term rule, Director X is elected and then three to six months later in that first year, he has to leave office for whatever reason and then the Vice Chairman moves up, does that six months count toward his two years or not? There is no recommendation from here but it is a issue that you have to come to grips with as a substantive and if you look at the ordinances around the county you would find that some go to both extremes. You serve one day, you've served the whole year. You serve 364 days, you haven't served a year at all or you draw a line, it's more or less than six months from the date of taking office. If it's less than six months served then that is considered one of your two years. If you serve more than six months that would be one of the two years. Director Collins: Those are my points and I am sure after we leave here and think about it, we will think of even more scenarios we could point out and it is going to be important to have a written word to display what our feelings are so we don't have a problem two years down the road. Would it be appropriate to have (if it passes this evening) the General Counsel draft up something in time for the December 1st Executive Committee so we could review it at that time prior to it coming back to the full board at our next meeting? TLW: Sure, no problem. Director Collins: Could the maker of the motion perhaps.... JC: It will be the order of the Chair. We will just do it. Director Steiner: Just a clarification. In the history of the Sanitation Districts has there been a Joint Chair previously at the Districts that has served more than two years? TLW: There have been several instances. We had six consecutive Chairmen that had the name of Don. Three of those served three years. Director Pickier: As long as the Executive Committee is going to review it, let's.... I think we are voting on the concept now more than anything else. Again I am saying, Ok we have a Chairman - is he automatically in for two years or can I change my vote a year from now. I think that these are things that can be cleared up by the Executive Committee. Director Swan: My understanding is since we're doing this by resolution and then the body can come back and reconsider this if there is a special situation and that -6- would not be precluded if something happened and we wanted to waive the rules and acknowledge.... TLW: That is correct. A resolution can always be repealed or amended. Just briefly on Director Pickler's comment I would suggest, I have been proceeding on the basis that if the two-year term is distinguished from a two-year term, a maximum of two one-year terms. Our present rules provide for the Chair to be elected each year for a one year term with a maximum of two of those vis-a-vis a two year election. By the way that is an option you can consider is a two-year term. Director Griffin: Clarification. I believe I heard Director Kerry say two consecutive years. A person serves for two years and five years from now then and you can be back in the saddle. Director Kerry: Two one-year terms. JC: I think that is understood. Director Stanton: Tom pretty well answered my question that we would hold the election each year so that ------- Later on I would like to introduce an Ordinance to limit John Collins to two spoken words. JC: Anyone else wishing to speak to the motion? We have a motion and a second. I think the discussion that has been had I think staff understands and can bring a draft resolution. Director Kerry: Maybe we should discuss whether a term has to be a full year or -- ------ just to see what the Directors feel on that issue because that did come up. When you are serving two one-year terms, is it the full year, half of year, one day, what do you count as a year? JC: It seems to me like the fairest way to do it is two consecutive elected terms and that way if I drop out of here and he moves up, he was not elected as the Joint Chairman. He would finish under our current ordinance but then he could be elected for two consecutive terms. I think that is what we agreed to, is it not? That would be the form of the motion. I think all of this would be within the motion. Any further discussion? Is there any opposition to motion? That takes care of the first item. JC: As you may know, there have been some reporting in a local newspaper in regards to the Joint Chairman's compensation. By the way, I want to say to all of you that I did not take the term limitations personally and I am not going to take the next thing personally either. I just want you to understand that even though it -7- has been in the paper concocted as such that it is me personally. A local newspaper seemed to be concerned about the fact that the Joint Chairman was receiving some compensation and did some articles. As a matter of fact, OCN had a news bit on that I don't know where they got their news bit but it certainly wasn't from me. I never talked with them. But nonetheless there has been some concern about the compensation paid to the Joint Chairman. I felt that it was important because that came up to bring it back to this body, to have this body discuss it and act upon it. Now I am not going to defend it. As a matter of fact I am going to conduct the hearing but I am probably not going to participate in it because of my position currently. Nonetheless I think it is important. First off, the thing that bothers me mostly is as an organization that is Number 1 in the nation and we couldn't get any press on that. Number 2 that we put $70 million across the street and at Plant No. 2 to save the ratepayers in this County $8.0 to $10.0 million a year. We couldn't get any of that in the newspaper either. It is pitiful that all of a sudden this kind of garbage has to come up. Now as far as I am concerned, this is for you folks to discuss. I want to have a discussion. I'd like to have some action on this if you intend to do something, but very frankly I felt it was important that we bring this before this board and discuss it publicly so that we can address it and hit it right square between the eyes. The floor is open. Comments? Director Pickier: Since the two-year term is going back to the Executive Committee, why don't we send it over to them, let them work it out and come back with some recommendations and we'll make our decision at that time. That is a motion. JC: I am open. That is a motion and a second. We had Director Griffin and then Director Steiner and Director Catlin. Director Griffin: Thank you Mr. Chairman. There are a number of things. I have made some notes; I think it is extremely important that I thank Bill for putting this on the agenda. I would like to say personally when we selected Bill to be our Joint Chairman, this policy was in place. That is very clear; it has been there for quite some time. In talking to a number of you fellows over the past month or so I've heard some comments made that seemed to really have less than an understanding of how the Joint Chairman is in fact paid. When he receives $100 per District, it is only when we have a Joint Board meeting. If the Joint Chairman goes to a meeting, a sub-committee or that type of thing, he is not receiving any more or any less than any of you or myself. If he attends a number of meetings in a day, he has the same limitations as we do. If I understand correctly, usually it amounts to having compensation from each District -8- on a Joint Board meeting like tonight and, as I understand it, I think it is also the Executive Board meeting, is that correct? JC: No Director Griffin: Not the Executive Board meeting. So it is the Joint Board meeting where it occurs. So it isn't an ongoing thing. I think there some gifts of real thought and wisdom of people preceding I think probably all of us, when they conceived this idea of having Joint Board meetings, I think it really streamlines and makes this organization in this community and our work much more efficient and effective. If we were meeting as individual Districts, we would be consuming a lot of staff time if you will. Having individual meetings costing us more collectively than what it is costing us today. Meeting collectively here together, according to my understanding, is a very efficient way to do the work. I'd like to give a little background having served as a Joint Chairman. I know that every meeting that comes up or every time that Bill gets a call or the Joint Chairman gets a call, he doesn't get paid for that. It goes with the territory. If staff needs information or needs to discuss a whole host of things during the year, who do they go to? They go to our Joint Chairman. Those calls can occur during business hours or can occur at his home, any time day or night. They could be emergencies. If I know Bill or any of the past Joint Chairmen that I've known, they serve at the pleasure and they act immediately without hesitation to our staff. I think that is a valuable asset for this organization. I think it is a real credit to the Joint Chair that they will take the time and effort to give of themselves of talents to share with staff so we can take care of the important business that comes before these Joint Boards. We talked about the proud organization and leadership and all that. That is one of the reasons we have all of that. I think that is an incentive. I think it is an incentive that is valuable. I would encourage that we continue to have that policy but I don't want to under estimate the amount of time the Joint Chairman puts in as outside of where they get direct compensation. They put in a tremendous amount of time. I thank Bill for the amount of time that he has put in and the effort that he has put in and I think I would like to see that ongoing. I think this is a fair thing to do. $100 a District per month in addition to the regular compensation that we have. I think it is reasonable; I support it. JC: Thank you, Don. We have next Director Steiner. Director Steiner: Responding to Director Pickier's comments. We did discuss this in the Executive Committee a couple of weeks ago and tossed it around. We discussed forming an Ad Hoc Committee to deal with it whether to bring a recommendation forward at this Joint Board and we rejected that in our discussion. I think, Bill, you really precipitated and said that you wanted out in front of the Joint Board and you wanted it decided upon in front of the Joint Board -9- and not by some small Ad Hoc Committee or Executive Board, so I think that should be shared since that was your direction to us the night of the Executive Committee meeting. JC: Thank you, Bill. Director Catlin: I wanted to reflect on what Don said. I went back to the records to see what I actually was paid to do the job. On those committees I looked back to the records to see what actually I was paid for the job. I looked at my income tax for the last three years and I added up the number of hours and I stood conservatively, I made about $10.00 an hour as Joint Chairman. That is very conservative considering we have a $54 million operating budget. On an annual basis $154 million of capital and you have that all the time. This is a $1.0 billion plus operation. That's very conservative amount you pay for the leadership. I would certainly think there is nothing wrong with our ordinance (Resolution) 86- 152-1 and we should just take a look at it like the motion calls for and move on to the next one. JC: Thank you. Director Swan: Mr. Chairman, I would like to offer a substitute motion. May I make a substitute motion to reaffirm the current policy and do it right here and now. (Seconded) JC: We have a motion and a second for a substitute motion. Director Collins. Director Collins: I have three points I would like to make. The first point is that I believe the $900 is a reasonable fee for the total effort of the position. Unfortunately, I believe the $900 has an appearance of unreasonableness to anyone just looking at it for one meeting that's a hunk of money. But when you look at the non-compensated time and effort, it is a reasonable amount. So if you have an unreasonable appearance but a reasonable amount then I don't think we should necessarily buck around with the amount. We should maybe put it some place it could at least tolerated by other people. The second point is that I would like to see, and this is not a motion because I understand we have a motion of a substitute motion under consideration if someone wants to go with it. I would like to see $100 per meeting as all other Directors are given yet a monthly stipend or flat compensation between $500 - $800 and depending if it is legal to give a monthly amount to the Joint Chairman but something on that range to compensate that individual, whoever he or she may be for the time and effort they put in over and above the compensatable time and effort. -10- The third point which doesn't directly bare upon this particular issue but I think I am going to say it anyway. I am a little bit peeved and perturbed that something like this gets such splash in the media. When this Board and the people who work here put forth efforts and programs like the Central Generation program which saves the citizens of this county millions of dollars over a period of time and is a unique and innovative program and it doesn't get the splash of any media, not just the newspapers but any of the media that was invited to come to and listen to the program that were put forth. This Districts have also won awards that have put the running of this establishment and the Directors and the staff far above anybody else in this country and yet we have not seen a splash on any of that as well. Thank you. JC: That is because that is good news. Director Pickler. Director Pickler: Mr. Chairman, I have no problem with a stipend. I don't think, maybe less than half, knows what the policy is on what we are talking about. When the figure came up, I never knew. I have been on this Board for about 7 or 8 years and I never looked at that policy and I still haven't. I guess the reason for my .... don't send it back to the Executive Board, I think maybe it is wiser for each to go back and we have the book. Is it in that book, Wayne? (Yes) It would give us the opportunity to look at it and then maybe if we have some other decisions to make, we could come back at the next meeting and make the decisions at that time. JWS: The policy is not in that book; it is in your supporting documents tonight. JC: Ted Moreno, then John Gullixson, then Stanton and then Parker. Director Moreno: I would agree with Director Collins to give the Joint Chairman a stipend for one reason and as I look at the map, I see some very large Districts and I am afraid in the future for some reason if it gets too large that we are going to start subdividing on the smaller Districts which would then create a larger compensation for the Joint Chair. That would be my only concern because as the rest of the county as they expand and grow larger, I assume create more Districts for those areas of the county and the Joint Chair would be receiving a larger compensation and then probably have more press. JC: Thank you. Director Gullixson: This evening I think ---- Director Stanton and Collins made it very clear statement which is precise and went with the heart. My problem is that we are dealing out there on a day-to-day basis. The public doesn't know this, but we are subject to cheap shots all the time. We leave ourselves open to cheap shots, you can bet that (tape ended) ...... I think this was a cheap shot. I think it _f 1 - was basically a journalist who basically did not do his research and jumped on one little flaw in the system, if you will, in terms of an explanation of how compensation is paid or how it is justified. If we are in the position where we are subject to the cheap shot because technically he is correct in his statement but he blows it and totally mischaracterizes the compensation and doesn't give it the true meaning --------- so I support his motion. I think we need to have the Executive Committee come up with a formula that spells out in policy book that every new member here can know in the future and understand ------- what this compensation is fair compensation for the Joint Chair. JC: Thank you. Director Stanton. Director Stanton: Certainly a number of people have mentioned that this subject should not be directed at Director Mahoney and I think we all know that Director Mahoney doesn't really need any personal defense in this regard. I want to remind those who were at the Executive Committee meeting two weeks ago and inform those who were not at the Executive Committee meeting two weeks ago, including I think the maker of one of these motions, that in fact it was Director Mahoney who during that Executive Committee said he wanted this aired out. And yet when we start to talk about it the first thing I hear is a motion, basically cutting off the discussion. That is not what Mr. Mahoney wanted. He encouraged discussion and in fact he was adamant in the Executive Committee meeting that whatever was done it should be done in this body. Now there was a suggestion during the Executive Committee meeting that perhaps an Ad Hoc Committee be set up. Not something to be in terms of get another committee stipend, but might be a viable way of coming up with a recommendation getting everybody's input so that we look at this from a number of different directions. A great deal of frustration I think on the part of not only the Directors but I think primarily on the part of the professional staff that actually do all of our technical work in terms of their inability to get appropriate recognition for what they have done for us out there in the field. I understand all of that and don't muddy all that up. The fact is if there was anything that Collins said it was the fact that we have an issue that has to be addressed in some manner. I will not support a reaffirmation policy. One question that I raised at the Executive Committee meeting, you could say I was just stupid if you want, that's fine, but I didn't know about this policy and I have been here at least 12 years and I didn't know about it. That in itself I think is a flaw. It was also, fine, and I'll accept is as my responsibility for it but how many of you knew about it? The other thing mentioned at the Executive Committee meeting is that there is a limitation of five meetings per month. IHe was corrected - six meeting per month.) I think what we need here is a broader issue here of a total and complete disclosure in terms of relevant operating procedures and policies. I am not talking about every procedure out in the field but I am talking about as they have to do with what we are answering for as Directors. Wayne Sylvester said at the Executive Committee he was going to make sure that we had all that and put -12_ that together because I think if you noticed you wouldn't have been hindsighted. I believe that some adjustment has to be made. I don't know what the answer is. I don't think a reaffirmation of policy is realistic. I think it is very unfortunate and I think we've said enough to remove Bill out of the sights on this because it is not Bill. As Don Griffin and Buck Catlin pointed out the policy has been in existence for many years before Bill even thought about being on the Sanitation Districts, so I think what we have to do Is look at the policy and see if it is rational in today's world. JC: We will go to Director Parker, then Director Hammond, Director Swan and then Director Catlin. Director Parker: I would agree with Director Stanton. I think that anytime an issue like this is raised, we owe it to our constituents to take the questions that are raised seriously even though personally we may have feelings that tell us that it is fine the way it is. I do think that it is obvious that the Joint Chair must put in a significant amount of time to do the job effectively. Perhaps the current formula isn't the right way to set that compensation level. Maybe the current compensation isn't the right level, maybe it's too high or too low. I would support a concept that perhaps of having some kind of monthly sum set for those services because even if we have a month where we go dark and we don't have a Joint meeting, perhaps, for some reason, I would venture a guess that the Joint Chair still during that month would spend a significant amount of time. There are a lot of issues that need to be examined. Maybe it hasn't been examined for a number of years; maybe now is the time to do that. Maybe an Ad Hoc Committee is the approach to take. I would agree; I don't think it would be productive or serve our interests best to simply reaffirm the current policy. Questions have been raised. Let's take this serious and look at it and bring it back to this body to make the final recommendation. JC: We go to Director Hammond, Director Swan is next, Director Catlin and then Director Collins. Director Hammond: I guess my concern during this whole process is are we looking at changing a policy because we had a newspaper article or is it because we had a bad policy? I personally don't like to be intimidated because the press just writes bad articles and tries to create something. We get to talking about the community or the District doing wonderful things and getting one piece of bad press, our cities are one of the ten safest cities in America, yet we are in Playboy and Hard Copy and everything else because of a nonexisting Code 4 Club. Those things are part of the territory. I don't think you change a policy just because you have an article that doesn't like the way you do things. Take a look and re- evaluate even though I think what we have makes a lot of sense. It basically says instead of having nine meetings you have one meeting and a guy gets paid for -13- doing the job. I can support that but if we are going to evaluate it because it needs evaluating for a problem is one thing. But because it is an article in the newspaper and you're scared of the press, that is craziness. JC: Thank you, Barry. We will move to Peer. Director Swan: I think that in response to Roger's comments that I was the maker of the substitute motion and the reason was not to send it back to a committee because we discussed it in the Committee as a whole like we are doing now which I think is the proper way to do this. If everyone is in light to what is going on, it's out in the light of day. I think it's something that a number of people have the strong feelings on. And, so not to lose it back to another committee to come up with recommendations that we can discuss here, I support the deal. If there is another aspect to this policy. In talking to Don if the Joint Chair is not chairing the meeting and the Vice Chair chairs the meetings, then he is paid for it and that is the only situation where the Vice Chair gets it. So the person that chairs the main meeting and carries the agenda is the one that is currently paid. I think that, this is a resolution that can be withdrawn by the body or changed by the body at anytime and until someone has an alternative way of doing it, my motion was to reaffirm what was currently doing until such an alternative motion or scheme of doing this comes up. I think this is fair, he is not overly compensated. We have spent a awful lot of time talking about this and we have breezed over something like $100 million worth of other items on the agenda tonight. JC: Thank you, Peer. Director Catlin. Director Catlin: If the maker of the motion I would recommend that the Joint Chairman form a special committee to review 86-151 in light of the Director's comments tonight and then make recommendations to the Executive Committee and bring it to the Board. JC: I will speak to that. I would be very uncomfortable picking people to sit on a board because, in fact, I would be accused then of skewing the committee if it came back in a way that people feel is not a way. Director Griffin: I think there is a way to do it. We have nine Districts and nine Chairmen. You put those nine people together. That is a cross-representation of all the Districts. JC: It is not going to be the Executive Committee; it is just going to be the Chairman of each District. What did you do Buck, did you make a substitute motion to the substitute motion? Director Catlin: I was going to make a substitute and modify what Don said of -14- being ----- to the Districts. JC: Hold on, Roger please. We got a motion, substitute motion? Director: I seconded it. JC: Ok. We have a substitute to the substitute to the motion. Hold on, please. I am going to ask Director Collins to speak and Director Stanton. Director Collins: Are we split away from the substitute of the substitute? JC: We're substituting away. Director Collins: I support that Director Catlin's motion of developing an Ad Hoc Committee. I also applaud your fairness, Joint Chairman, in trying to keep a hands off situation. I think that is unnecessary again because it should not be a personalized thing with you. This is a policy. I'm surprised to hear the Vice Joint Chair gets the same amount because I want to go back to my comments before........ JC: He doesn't. Only if I do not appear. Director Collins: Even if he chairs the meeting because what that does is it ties it to the meeting. When I look at it from as I said before, it should be tied to the total job. The Vice Chairman is not doing everything whoever he or she may be. He is not doing everything that the Joint Chairman is doing during that month or period of time. I will still go back and I'll be a member of this Ad Hoc Committee if it gets approved in some fashion recommended, I want to make some change to what I think is an appearance of unreasonableness. It is a shame that it was brought up in such a fashion that It was and the manner that is was, but nonetheless it still would be to the reasonable person unreasonable to give something like $900 to do this meeting because they don't understand the total are that this covers. JC: Good point. Director Stanton. Director Stanton: Mr. Chairman, this is the second substitute motion and I just wanted to raise one issue. The Chairpersons of the individual Districts and the Executive Committee, I have a real hard time separating one from the other. I would ask Mr. Catlin, I'll tell you what my preference would be; that this committee would be open to anyone who wanted to get on this committee within the limitations of the Brown Act for the purposes of allowing our newer members or whoever wanted to get into to that committee structure. I just think that again, I respect and appreciate seniority but again I am looking at perception, and -15- whether you like it or not ---------, but whether you like it or not, the seniority element of it here I think is a problem and I would like to have the opportunity for some of the newer, younger and more recently admitted members to be on there. Mr. Catlin do you have a problem with that in terms of opening that committee to whomever within the limitations of the Brown Act? Director Catlin: We would do in our city, I would have a Vice Chair and form a special committee and you go ahead and pick the people or anybody that wants to volunteer for that committee but you have to do essentially the same thing with a citizens group with no hopes barred. If somebody wants to participate in that then fine, and it would be open but it would be up to the Vice Chairman ------- JC: Peer. Director Swan: Very quickly. If members on this Board, all 44 of us, go to this meeting, it is going to be more expensive. Director Stanton: Hey Peer, I said within limitations of the Brown Act. JC: As long as it is a noticed hearing; I think we can all go to it. I think the main thing is having the notice out. Director Rice. Director Rice: If you have this committee, if all the people were allowed to come if they want to, are they all allowed to vote on issues that are on the floor? JC: That all depends upon how the committee is established, I would assume. Very frankly, this whole Board has the right and should have right to make the decision on this matter. As far as what I am hearing the discussion now is just that we want to have, some people want to have a committee established to look at it and make a recommendation back to this Board. Ultimately this Board will make the decision, not the committee. What did you do Sal? Seconded the motion. Which one? Can you bring me up to speed? I was talking and there was a motion made. Director Sapien: The third sub. JC: Ok, what is it? Director Sapien: Buck's motion. JC: Ok, that is the one that the Vice Joint Chairman appoints a committee that gets together and state it Buck. -16- Director Catlin: That the Vice Chairman would appoint a special committee to review 86-152 in light of the understanding and make recommendation to the Executive Committee. JC: Ok, we need to get somewhere here real quick. Director Steiner and then I think I am going move on with some votes or clean it up somehow. Director Steiner: Before you vote, I wanted to just focus back just a little bit a variety of ways by others. I don't think anyone disputes the fact that the Joint Chairman has extraordinary responsibilities but so does the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, so does the Chairman of the Orange County Transit ----- and mayors of our cities. I frankly would prefer to have a system where the Joint Chairman is compensated for each individual meeting that is attended up to a certain maximum, somewhere around six. I think we can boil it all down, rather than have a system where there is multiple payments for one meeting and if you boil it all down and back to what John Collins statement about unreasonableness or the perception of unreasonableness, I really think that in today's political climate that perception and reality with the people who are out there who have increasing distrust of government and I just don't think that you can hide that no matter what kind of discussions you have. JC: We have a substitute motion on the floor right now that we are going to move forward with and that is Buck's, seconded by ..... further discussion. Director Miner: What was the final comment regarding the Executive Committee in your motion please? Director Catlin: That they would make a recommendation to the Executive Committee and further on to the Boards. Director Miner: I would like to delete the Executive Committee but to come back to this Board. Director Catlin: I have no objection to that. JC: Ok, what about the second. Director Stanton: Mr. Chairman, I am sorry if I am upsetting somebody by wanting to discuss this again, but this is a committee as a whole as you have indicated and it is the only opportunity that everybody has to speak and be heard by everyone else. My question is that we have not discussed this privately to Mr. Steiner is what I am hearing you say is that there is a limitation of the number of meetings that any of the rest of us can attend which is six. You are saying that for the Joint Chairman, you see some reasonableness in increasing the maximum number -17- of meetings that can be attended per month is something like ten or twelve or something to be determined? Director Steiner: Something to be, both of us have been to just a couple meetings per month. Director Stanton: That's right. But is that what you are saying? And you ought to just do this as a _ as opposed to referring it? Director Steiner: I think the original, I think Peer made the motion as far as to let's deal with it right now, I would propose that's what we ought to do. I have ----- this is what Bill wanted in the discussions of the Executive Committee and I support sending it back. JC: John Cox. Director Stanton?: Mr. Chairman, if I may just continue with ---. I am moved by that because you yourself had not suggested that the committee that was mentioned in the Executive Committee, and if we can't settle it now I think you solved the problem whether you like it or not. And, again, you are wasting time promoting why you didn't get a pump station in the paper. You can beat the dead horse on that one. You got an issue that you've got to face but if it can't be solved with this -------- in terms of a Joint Chairman getting the opportunity to be compensated for some number of meetings beyond what the regular members do. I think that sounds like the most equitable solution as far as I am concerned. JC: Director Cox. Director Swan: --- I believe that is against the law. TLW: I hate to rain on this parade of complexity of motions. We are now on our fifth but I would have to address the suggestion of Director Steiner. We have in place our own Districts' resolutions and they have been in place for 30 years plus. The one we are talking about, the most current one 1986, is the one that we are really dealing with. But the underpinnings to all of the policies of this District are what are prescribed by the state statues. The County Sanitation District Act, which is our governing act, prescribes that each Director may receive a sum of $100 per meeting or for each day's service but not to exceed six days per month. So you won't have the discretion to set it at seven, eight, nine, ten or 100. Preempted on that issue. Now is there another way around that? Probably not because 40734 which addresses the Joint Chairman simply says that where you have a joint administrative organization as we do, the Districts may provide, as we have for these 30 years, that the Joint Chairman may receive the monthly compensation for each District that is present at the meeting. By example, if you -18- have a joint meeting but only six Districts of nine are convened he would not get $900, he would get $600. Or if there is a joint meeting of two Districts, and we've had those periodically over the years but not a lot, then he would get $200. The statue would say that the only reason he gets any extra compensation strictly because of that one section of the code which only allows it for the jointly held meetings. Conceptually I could structure it so that you could compensate him for more meetings but it would never go more than $600. That would be the absolute limit for the total compensation for the month. He or she could be compensated for $100 for Joint and $100 for Executive and then any other four meetings. As it is now, the Joint Chairman is compensated $100 for Executive, $100 for any other meetings he has and then the $900 for this meeting. In the course of reviewing this I have gone back through the historical annals. Unfortunately, the state doesn't maintain legislative history nearly so well 30 or 40 years ago as they do today. I could pull it up on computer today and find out what every Legislator had for lunch when he was voting on committee. Thirty years ago it was very scarce. The only comment in there that was on point was that it was a reflection of the multiple duties; it was a commentary put in there by some Legislator when the bill was first enacted in the 1960's. Those are the parameters that you are going to have to live with. Director Steiner: Does that preclude our being unable to establish a higher level of compensation per meeting for the Joint Chairman? TLW: Yes, the limit is $100 per meeting, period. The only way you can get more per meeting would be just for this meeting. That is the only way to do it. The $100 number, by the way, is not an automatic number. It is a permissible maximum. You can set the number at anywhere from $1 to $100. It is routinely followed if you look through the history of resolutions of these Districts over the last 30 years, you would track it in accordance with when the State Legislative. When it was first enacted, it went from $20 to $25, stayed there for about a dozen years, it went to $50, then to $75 for a few years except for the Supervisors they were treated in a very ignominious manner and only kept at $50 and then it moved to $100 about six or seven years ago. It is a permissible so you could fix a stipend so that the Chairman would get $100 for every meeting attended just like every other Director from every other District and then for the Joint you could pick another number but you can not exceed $100. JC: Director Collins and then Director Moreno. Director Collins: In my additional comments, Tom, I suggested perhaps a $100 per meeting but then a flat administrative stipend. Is that permissible by the code? TLW: I do not see that that is possible. It has to be tied to per meeting or per each day's service to the District. -19- Director Collins: I still think, by the way Mr. Joint Chairman, we should go back with an AD Hoc Committee but I would perhaps say we should be looking at it, if nothing else, then we are going to keep something in addition to $400 if it is going to be voted on this evening, that we do a much better job of explaining that the position has other responsibilities and the amount is not necessarily directly tied ---. Director Moreno: Are you able to deal with something like a car allowance. Everyone: Oh N00000000. TLW: I think the direction is that I am not supposed to answer that question. Director Puckett: Bill, through the Chair. I appreciate Buck's motion but I don't think there is any difference in having the Vice Chair appoint a committee than having the Joint Chair appoint a committee. If you're going to have someone appoint a committee it should be somebody who is totally impartial or a Past Joint Chairman or somebody because I think there is no difference here. JC: Did you have something Eva that you wanted? Director Miner: I think it should be the Joint Chairman that appoints It. Why the Vice Chairman or the past Chairman? You are the presiding officer here. JC: I am going to bite the bullet and do it. I think we need to get on it and get it done. Director Swan: Speaking of the opposition to the motion that was made by Buck, I think it is appropriate -------- because we are wasting too much time. Make sure we go against the current motion so we get to the next substitute motion which is reaffirming the policy. JC: We are going to do some voting. The motion that Buck had was still with the Vice Joint Chairman. You understand what that motion was or do you need it restated? Director Catlin: Vice Joint Chairman appoint a special committee to review 86-152 in light of Directors comments tonight and make recommendations to the Joint Board. JC: Everyone has heard that? We have a motion and a second. Director Gullixson and then I am going to call the question. Director Gullixson: What is the difference between this motion and the first one? -20- JC: There is a difference. The distinction in what we have here is I don't think that motion is necessarily limited to the number of people. Whereas, if you were to look at the Executive Committee which was the first number; it would be the Chairman of each District; it would be the current Joint Chairman, the Vice Joint Chairman, Past Joint Chairmen and it would include Supervisors, as well. That would be the distinction. All in favor. We're going to do it by hands this time. All in favor ... TLW: Boy, I'll tell you, I'll probably be the guy looking for a job after this. I want to bring to your attention that the ultimate decision on this has got to be voted on by individual Districts so if you want to take the motion on the joint basis to refer it to committee we can handle that. Ultimately the decision as to whether 86-152 remains in place, is amended or repealed will be voted upon by individual Districts. JC: We have the motion and the second. All in favor raise your right hand please. 10. All opposed to the motion. All right the opposition prevails. That motion fails. Let us move to the last preceding substitute motion which was, and I lost it. Was it Peers? Peer, I believe your's was and state the motion again, please. Director Swan: Reaffirm the current policy. Director 7: No, no the prior motion was to have the Chair of every District. TLW: I believe the last substitute motion was Director Griffin's which modified Director Catlin's motion. Director Griffin's motion was only to have the nine District Chairs sit as the committee. JC: Director Griffin. Director Griffin: I don't recall making the motion. JC: All right; bad motion. That motion fails for lack of a maker. TLW: Actually I stand corrected. What it was is Director Catlin made a substitute motion appointing an Ad Hoc Committee to study and report. Director Griffin suggested using only the nine District Chairs to which Director Catlin then did respond and said, "I'm changing my substitute motion". In any event that was the last preceding substitute motion. JC: I think we are with Peer now. Peer, the motion please. Director Swan: The motion is that we reaffirm the current policy. 21 JC: We have a motion. Do we have a second? All right. Director Kerry. Director Kerry: I just have one concern with that and that is the fact that we discussed here that we don't clearly define what we are saying. To me that is a real concern. It's the public perception. If we agree with current policy, I think we have to define it very carefully so we don't have this keep coming back to us. Director Swan: My recommendation also is that all new Directors when they first become a member of this District be given a ---- of how the compensation goes because it seems to be a ------- so everyone knows ------- JC: I think staff has already discussed this in regards to probably Director Orientation is a good place to discuss these matters. Unfortunately all Directors do not go to them but we do need to have a way of communicating, probably in other areas than just this. The point is well taken. Speaking to the motion. Director Stanton, Director Collins and then I am going to call for the question. Director Stanton: With all due respect to my good buddy here. I don't think it's just politically subsidy, I think it is just common sense that we ought to know this at the time we come on board. I think Mr. Sylvester is going ahead and preparing that information for all of us involved. With regard to this motion, I think that Mr. Steiner eloquently spoke of this. All these other reasons and concerns that we have about the danger of how this came to our attention are at this point is irrelevant. The relevant point is the policy and how does it apply in today's or yesterday's ----- for that matter. In all due respect to Director Swan, I can't support that. Director Collins: I too will not be able to support the motion for two reasons. First, I would like to see a better or more exhaustive study done on maybe alternatives to current policy. Second of all, I found out something new tonight. I have been on the board three years; that the Vice Joint Chair got the same $900 as the Joint Chair for running the meeting. This goes against what I believe to be reasonable. I believe that it is feasible again to give the Joint Chair more money, not to just run the meeting but for all the other work. The Vice Chair generally does not have that same encompassing time and effort involved and I would not be in favor of that. I would be reaffirming my belief to do that and I can't do that, sir. JC: Thank you Director Collins. We have a motion on the floor. Director Steiner. Director Steiner: Clarification. Will this be a roll call by District? JC: We need to do it by District, don't we, because this is to reaffirm the current motion. All right. Let me make sure that legal counsel agrees. Do you want to -22- caucus? All right we will take a couple of minutes so that you can caucus. There has been a request for Districts to caucus. I think it is an important enough issue and hopefully no one will leave. We only need to take a couple of minutes. You ready to vote? Ok, there is one thing that General Counsel would like to address that Director Collins brought up, just for clarification. TLW: The issue has been bantered around as to whether the Vice Joint Chairman has the right and gets paid for chairing this meeting. 1 have, somewhere back in history, issued an opinion that in the absence of the Joint Chairman the Vice Joint Chairman assumes his duties and roles and therefore would technically and legally qualify to receive that. However, my recollection was confirmed by Wayne. In the history the Vice Chair has never received those funds with one exception. When Chairman Catlin was injured and was gone for three or four months, I believe, at that time the Vice Chair really assumed all of the duties and he was paid the stipend for chairing that meeting but there has never been any other instance even though the Vice Chair may have sat in for all or part of a meeting where the Vice Chair has been paid. Director Collins: Does he have a right for that? TLW: It probably did. Even the state legislation could probably be clarified. You could make the argument, my interpretation of it is in the absence of the Joint Chairman the Vice Joint Chairman assumes that role and therefore he effectively is the Joint Chairman. He changes titles for that day or whatever. The observation of yours is well taken. Director Collins: This is the first that I have heard of this and it gives more credence in my mind to go back to the Ad Hoc Committee and clean that up a little bit and maybe a couple of the other things. JC: We have a motion on the floor. You all understand the motion? You are voting by District. Director Sapien: We are voting by District. We have 60 Directors, 63. We need to caucus. JC: You guys can abstain but everybody else has called for the question. Penny, please call the roll. TLW: At the present time, for the next month's Joint Board meeting it is going to cost District 5 and District 14 an extra $100. Seriously the voting is such that the motion failed in Districts 1,2,3,6,11,13 and passed in Districts 5 and 14. District 7 has a 3, 3 and 1 vote. The net effect is that District 5 and 14 having passed it, they have simply reaffirmed it so they would continue. The anomaly of this is -23- going to be that we are going to have to here more motions I assume because the motion was simply to reaffirm. You simply did not reaffirm but you have not repealed the motion in place so therefore the six Districts where the motion failed, the resolution is still in place. JC: We are now down to the original motion. The original motion - Director Pickier. Director Pickier: The original motion and again go back to the Executive Committee as I mentioned before and the if the Chair and Vice Joint Chair don't want to attend, they don't have to attend. Again, I would go with just the original motion. We send it back and they work on it and come back to the Board. JC: That is the motion. We have a second. Clarification. Director Kerry: If Director Pickier would like to modify that so that the prior compensation that was in place before that last motion would be to continue until the Executive Committee-----. JC: It is anyway. Director Kerry: Well, except for those two Districts. TLW: They affirmatively said we want to pay it. You just said we don't want to change it. JC: We have a motion and a second to refer the matter to the Executive Committee, to study and make recommendation back to the Joint Boards. I'm not going to ask for discussion. Is there any opposition to that motion? All right. Raise your hands once again in opposition to the motion please. TLW: Need those hands up and hold them for a minute. The vote is close. This is a motion to refer it back to the Executive Committee for a study. Director Kerry: Point of clarification. Would you identify who is on the Executive Committee for members who may not know? JC: The Joint Chairman, Vice Joint Chairman, the Past Joint Chairmen which includes Director Griffin and Director Catlin, both of the Supervisors and it includes all of the Chairmen of all nine Districts plus in addition we invite every meeting two Directors to come as well. That is the makeup of the Executive Committee including, of course, staff. The voting people are those individuals. Director Sapien: The motion is to refer to the Executive Committee? -24- JC: Yes. Now, I ask, Is there opposition to the motion? Alright, In that case what I wanted to see was a raise of hands if you're opposed to it. I am doing it backwards but I think it will work. 23. TLW: It failed. JC: The motion failed. Effectively, ladies and gentlemen, we are back to square one. All I can tell you is that if you want to continue with this item I am at your pleasure. If not, we will just allow it to sit. We can raise it next meeting. We will bring it back before the Board if you want to at that time. Director Miner: Mr. Chairman, we want you to appoint a committee? JC: You want me to appoint a committee? Directors: Yes. We want an Ad Hoc Committee. Director Catlin: I motion that we table this issue. JC: All right, there has been a motion to table. We have a motion and a second to table. The motion was to table this item. We have a motion and a second. You can reintroduce. Absolutely. Director Stanton: Point of information. If you vote this way, table a motion and never discuss it again until you make a motion to remove the table. JC: That is correct. We have a motion and a second to table. All in favor signify by raising your hand; of tabling the item. Raise your hand if you are in favor of it. TLW: That motion fails. JC: That motion fails. All opposed? You have a point there. It effectively, well, I abstain. Director Catlin, did you have another comment? The table fails. We are back to square one. Director Stanton? Director Stanton: This may not be highly popular but I think this issue hasn't been voted on. I move to eliminate the policy. Director Kerry: I'll second that. JC: We have a motion to eliminate. Now, we're going to have to go through each District. Tom, do you want to address that? -25- TLW: Well, I would recommend that to do away with the policy you mean to repeal Resolution 86-? Director Steiner: -------------------- JC: So you want to effectively? Director Stanton: Bill, articulate for me. John usually does but you do a better job. Director Steiner: 1 don't know why a motion, again, --- Section 4733 amendment which states that compensation shall not be more than $100 per day for attendance by the member or the Joint Chairman for each day of service, not exceeding a total of six calendar days in any calendar month according to the memorandum from General Counsel. Director Miner: I second it. JC: Alright, we have a motion and a second. Restate the motion again, if you will, Bill? Director Steiner: Just the adjustment of Section 4733 which currently states that the Joint Chairman's compensation shall not exceed $100 per day attended for services rendered, and the Joint Chairman for each day service rendered as a member I requested the Board not to exceed a total of six days in any calendar month, together with any incident thereto ----. TLW: First of all, just a technical correction. 4733 is the State law. We can't change that but we have our resolution. 1 am not sure that I quite understood Director Steiner's. I think I heard you put that in there. Your intent was that the compensation should not exceed $100 for each meeting of the District attended by the member or the Joint Chairman. I would suggest to you that that is already the case. That is different than .... Director Steiner: It is $100 from each District ---------- TLW: I think that was Director Stanton's motion was to repeal Section 4 of our resolution. Director Stanton: If this is what you mean, I hereby vote that we limit the compensation for any Director to a maximum of $100 per day. All the other stuff is in there. You can't go more than six per month. I am not changing that. Now, is that clear enough? -26- TLW: Per meeting and/or day's served, that's the language of the state's statute. $100 per meeting or for each day's service, not to exceed six meetings. Director Griffin: If I understood the motion, it deals with Section 1 and leaves in place Section 4? TLW: No, Director Griffin. I think not. The correction, the effect would be to repeal.- in your agenda package we have Resolution No. 86-152. It's on page N-7. The section to accomplish Director Stanton's motion would be effectively to repeal Section 4 of our resolution. That is the section that says, "The Director serving as Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall receive the sum of One Hundred Dollars from each District which he presides over in a jointly-held meeting". Your objective was ..... Director Stanton: I think we both tried to say it in different ways. TLW: Your objective is that the Joint Chairman would not get the extra compensation. Director Stanton: That is what I said. TLW: If that is the motion then what it would actually be would be to repeal Section 4 of the resolution because Section 4 now provides the authority to pay the Joint Chairman extra for chairing the Joint meeting. JC: We have a motion. Need a second. We have a motion and a second. Discussion? Director Collins? Director Collins: I have a big concern here that we are rushing the judgement again. We don't have all of the facts. I would like to know, for example, how much time does the Joint Chairman spend on Districts business on an average month? We don't know that. I don't know that. We don't know the language or wording made of the proposal of motion is correct so is representative of our feelings. I will be voting against this and I would urge that a motion be passed if this one does fail, going back to the establishment of an Ad Hoc Committee and if it does fail, I will put it forward and maybe have Director Catlin be a chairperson of that. I am not going to make a substitute motion because we get screwed up when we do that.. Director Moreno: I will support this motion but I still have a problem as Director Collins was trying to get to and that is that you put in a lot of time. My perception is you should still be compensated more than everybody else. And if we are going to basically turn down your extra change for serving as the Joint Chairman, we still have to come up with some type of ad hoc committee to find out what is a -P7- responsible position to pay the Joint Chair. Director Stanton: If this gets voted down, then put in something in place of the --- JC: Director Catlin? Director Catlin: I have to talk with John ----- I think it is the eleventh hour here and we are jumping from suggestion to suggestion ----- I would have rather gone into deliberation and this is kind of going back to my original motion. I would rather have the Executive Committee or Ad Hoc Committee to evaluate--------. Director Hammond: It seems like there are a significant group of folks who want to have some type of committee and there is another group that don't. Why don't we move ahead on this item. Reject the motion and go with the tabling. When the folks that want it , revise this policy, have a policy that they feel is good, wonderful and worked out, they could bring it back together after they have met together and we can deal with it at that time. JC: We have a motion and a second. Is there any further discussion? All in favor of the motion. State the motion. TLW: The motion would be to repeal Section 4 of Resolution 86-152. If you take a blanket vote unless it is very clear that it is all the same vote for all Districts we will go back to District vote because there are presently nine Resolutions on the books. The effect of this resolution is to remove that provision that now grants to the Joint Chairman $100 from each of the Districts that convene for the Joint meeting. That would be repealed. Therefore the Joint Chairman would not receive any extra compensation. He would receive only that compensation of $100 per day for each actual meeting he attended. Director Minter: Point of information, though, is that can be amended with a recommendation after something ----- to designate ----- actually repealed. TLW: Sure JC: All in favor of the motion please raise your hand. TLW: I would suggest that we get a separate motion from District 6 because it would appear that District 6 is about to repeal that provision. Motion did not pass but if District 6 should make a motion, if that is their intent to repeal that section of resolution which would have the effect that District 6 would not pay the $100 extra compensation. That motion has failed. Director Stanton's motion has failed. JC: District 6 can still make its individual motion. Folks, if I can, I don't want to -28- step into this thing, but if you will allow me to, I would just as soon ask that Director Catlin appoint a committee and that committee meet, an Ad Hoc Committee? And, if this is all right with you folks, I would like to get this thing moving. We do need to make a decision. I appreciate your patience. If you wish to serve on the committee, Buck can I impose on you to do that? Director Catlin: Yes, I will ask the General Manager to circulate a letter and whoever would like to be on it. JC: If you can do that, we can get something going because I am just afraid that ... We have a motion and a second. Is there any opposition to that motion. Thank you all for your indulgence. #16 - Awarding Phase I Wastehauler Dumping Facilities Modifications. Job No. P1-46-1 TMD: Last month you approved plans and specs to relocate our wastehauler dump station and you gave us authority to award a contract in the amount to not exceed $200,000 to the low bidder. Unfortunately, we received five bids and the low bid was greater than $200,000. It was $248,953 in the amount submitted by Dorado Enterprises. Our recommendation to you tonight is to award this contract to the low bidder, Dorado Enterprises in the amount of $248,953. That completes my report. Director Hammond: ----? TMD: They are excellent contractors. #18 - Closed Session JC: I don't know if this evening you wish to go into closed session to discuss the comments that were made earlier. I will tell you that the Personnel Committee will be meeting and responding back to us so unless there is a desire we will not have closed session. #32 - Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. Contract No. 14-1-1 A TMD: You have been working on this project for about eight years and you awarded a design contract to Boyle Engineering to prepare plans for a very large sewer conveyance facility, to take sewage from the City of Irvine, ------ Costa Mesa and Santa Ana and deliver it to this plant. You awarded in the past four construction projects for this project and tonight we are asking you to award a fifth of six plant construction projects. _29- This project is the construction of a sewer from Fairview Road and Baker Street in the City of Costa Mesa over to the Santa Ana River. Previously you built all of the facilities underneath the Santa Ana River and built facilities east of this in Baker Street and under the 405 Freeway over to our pump station at Main Street on the north side which is the beginning point of this project. It is a large project; two miles of sewer conveyance facilities. Most of it is 98 pipe, 10,500 feet of 98 pipe. It does include a ----- culvert through the Mesa Verde Country Club. The project has been delayed several years in order to acquire easements through the Mesa Verde Country Club and through the San Joaquin easement owned by a Bank but there is a tenant there who has fought this project. For ------ San Joaquin easement we have judgement in court that Mr. Magna may not enter into but yet he may. The final date will be Friday; therefore, we will be in court on this Friday. If he doesn't it may delay the project a few weeks. Otherwise we will be ready to go ahead with the award. The project like I said is two miles of pipe, it is at Baker Street and ------ under Harbor Blvd. and then it parallels Harbor Blvd. one block to the west so that we don't actually work at Harbor Blvd. where the traffic is so bad and then goes down Gisler Ave. to the Santa Ana River. Our estimate is $11 .0 million. We have budgeted $13.7 million for this project. I really believe we will get very good bids in this climate; well under the estimate of $11.0 million. Tonight's action is to recommend to you to approve the plans and specifications so that we can proceed with the bidding of this project. -30- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNIY, CAUFORNIA faM SAVENUE October 27, 1993 Oa,BOA 0127 FOUNrMN vN V.a .MWA BBIBBBIn MEMORANDUM TO: J. Wayne Sylvester General Manager SUBJECT: Request for Committee Meetings in November 1. Joint Works Selection Committee: Thursday, Nov. 18 at 7:30 a.m. We have three projects for consideration, Jobs No. P1-40-1/P2-47-1, P7- 41/P2-48, and Addn. 1 to Job No. J-31. 2. Special Ad Hoc Committee re Service to Outside Areas To discuss Los Alisos Water District and IRWD wastewater discharges through IRWD's proposed Alton Trunk Sewer. Thomas RA. Dawes Director of Engineering TMD:jt cc: Board Secretary b PHONE (714)962-2411 fr * FAX (714)962-03M RITA J. BROWN . Board Secretary COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O.WX 11127-1081 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272ed12T /� • �� 4e opeo jbM vo a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA FAX TRANSMITTAL FORM DATE: ,•30�� APPROXIMATE TIME: I:oO m - �T TO O ORO: FAXNO.:( ) To. One. rAHIIO.:( ) TO: ORG: FAXNQ.;( ) TO: - ORO: FAX NO.:( ) 7otel number of�page/slbeln9�tr nsmltted(Inclu�din/y this irrann9_midel form)' SUBJECT: JA7!(� UT 141)w. /Jr ZT om �IS GS G/fl IgJ12. r PRIORITY: ❑ urgent ❑ Per Your Request ❑ FYI ❑ Per Our Conversadon ❑ Other Reply Needed: 64m ❑ No -� Original will beforwarded vie: ❑ U.S.Mall ❑ Air Express ❑ Messenger ❑ 0HOMl will not be forwarded SPECIAL NOTES: art rwwo a " ailmw uwA. OJI' FROM: EM:_ �U�9 Y TreneMitlnd O9erator. Eat NOTE: It you encounter any difficulty In receiving the tote)number of pages Indicated above, PLEASE CALL RACK AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AT(714)982-2411 AND ASK FOR THE TRANSMITTING OPERATOR. CSDOC DEPARTMENT FAX NUMBERS FOR REPLY: Administration. . . . . . . . . . . (714)982.0356 ❑ Control Center-Plant 1 . . . . . . . (714)965.6777 ❑ Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714)962-0427 ❑ Operations Center•Went 2 (7 )1a e6e-2330 ❑ Finance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (714)962-3954 ❑ Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . (714)962.5018 ❑ Purchasing . . . . . . . . . . . . (714)98.5-0728 ❑ Constr.Mgmi-Plant 1 . . . . . . . . (714)964-4775 ❑ Oper.6 Mmce . . . . . . . . . . (714)982.8379 ❑ Conelr.Mgml- Plant 2 . . . . . . . . (714)965-215B ❑ Technical Services (714)902-6957 ❑ Laboratory (714)962-2591 ([arnnouen.R.ryve AR.wdSe.m Cenhell ' ' . . . . . . ' (w9..ud'Ca�rxrlrmommol P.O.9as alta Pmsedn CIA 2726 8117 Telcphosei ei(714(71/)9629411 11-30-93 01 :63PL P001 4131 #15 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman's Term and Comoonsation The Joint Chairman announced that based on a request to consider a term limit for- the post of Joint Chairman at the last Board meeting, and the recent publicity about the established compensation for the Joint Chairman, this matter had been scheduled for general discussion on both the Issue of [Imitation of terms to be served by the Joint Chairman and compensation to be paid to the Joint Chairman. Joint Chelrman Mahoney Indicated that In view of his current position as the Joint Chairman, he would not actively participate In the discussion. Discussion then followed by the Directors. Several Directors addressed this Issue and noted certain advantages to having the experience of a two-year tenure as Joint Chairman as part of the continuing general Directorship, and to have new personnel assume the leadership role provided a greater depth of experience and Insight for the benefit of all members. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried that the terms to be served by the Joint Chairman should be limited to two consecutive elected terms. The General Counsel was directed to draft a resolution to effect the change for the Executive Committee's review and submittal to the Boards. The Joint Chairman then entertained a discussion among the Directors on the Issue of compensation. Considerable extended discussion followed with comments and suggestions being put forth by most all Directors. A motion was then made and seconded to refer this matter to the Executive Committee. A substitute motion was then made to reaffirm the provisions of existing Resolution No. 86-162, wherein the Joint Chairman receives the compensation of 4 R-91% 11-30-93 01 :63PM P002 1{31 S 100.00 per meeting from each of the nine Districts when the Districts are convened In Joint session, Further discussion followed, including remarks that the extensive work required by the Joint Chairman which Is not compensated In any respect, such as telephone conferences and meetings with the management staff, reflect a considerable time requirement to be expended by the Joint Chairman, and therefore the existing Resolution Is an accurate reflection of value. Comments were expressed that the total amount to be paid for the joint meetings may exceed reasonable limits, and It should be reviewed and studied. A second substitute motion was then made to appoint an Ad Hoc Committee to study this Issue and report to the Executive Committee and Joint Boards. Further comments followed, Including suggestions that the Ad Hoc Committee be comprised of the respective Chairmen from the nine Districts. The maker of the substitute motion agreed to revise the substitute motion to reflect the suggestion that the Ad Hoc Committee be so composed. Concern was expressed as to whether the present Resolution authorized the Vice Joint Chairman, when acting in the place of the Joint Chairman, would also be entitled to receive the Joint compensation from each District. General Counsel remarked that If, in fact, the Vice Joint Chairman was assuming all of the duties of the Joint Chairman, In his opinion, it would qualify that person to receive the Joint compensation for the )Dint meeting. Counsel noted that there were fear instances 9 �/ In the past where the Vice Joint Chairman received It, most recently due to the U Injury-related disability of the Joint Chairman for a few months. Comments were also expressed indicating a desire to have newer members of the Boards sit as part of the Ad Hoc Committee A further modification of the second substitute motion was then made to have the currant Vice Joint Chairman appoint a Special Ad Hoc Committee, to review the existing Resolution and to make recommendations to the Executive Committee and Then to the Joint Boards. After further discussion, the substitute motion to form an Ad Hoc Committee was 6 R-92% 11-30-93 01 :63PM P003 f{31 disapproved by all Districts, with a combined vote of 10 ayes and 30 naya. The question was called for voting on the r ed substitute motion to reaffirm Resolution No. 86.152. A roll call vote was taken; the motion was approved by Districts Nos, 5 and 14. District No. 7 resulted In a tie vote, and the motion was disapproved by Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 11 and 13. General Counsel advised that the effect of the disapproval of the motion was nonetheless to have Resolutlon No. 8e-152 remain in place. He further advised it would take a specific motion to repeal Resolution No. 80.152 In order to negate all of those existing provisions. Following a call for the questlon on the motion to refer the matter back to the Executive Committee, said motion failed by voice vote. A motion to table the.matter was then moved and seconded. The motion failed on a combined vote of 15 ayes, 20 nays and 2 abstentions. A new motion was then moved and seconded to repeal Section 4 of Resolution No. 86-152 relating to the payment to the Joint Chairman of the sum of $100.00 by each District for joint meetings of the Boards, By combined voice vote, that motion felled. The Joint Chairmen then announced that In vleff�f the lack of consensus on any of the above motions, he was thereby appolM,Director Buck Catlin to Chair an Ad Hoc Committee, with directions for Director Caatlip to solicit volunteer participation an the Committee, and to make the appolnI and to undertake a report to present yt to the Joint Boards at the earliest possible date. ;#16 ALL DISTRICTS Awardina Job No. P1.46-1 to DaLado Enterprises, Inc. Verbal report of staff 6 R-9I% 11-36-I 01:43Flf 'FOOT e31 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 Q OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AIMUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON NOVEMBER 10, 1993 s ITATIri a o Qee � oRgNCE to1' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 0 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A Molly mewing of the Bonds of Dlracmra of Cottony SsnNadon D mlCb Now. 1.2,3,G. S. 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County. California,visw bed on November 10, 1993. at 7:30 p.m.,In One Diserle s'Adminlatraeve Offices. Followi.p tbe Pledger of Allegance and lrwocetlon the roll. called and Oe Secretary reported a aoerom present for Dlenica Nos. 1,2.3, S,D,7, 11, 13 and 14 so follows: Al ALT9W11TE DIRECTORS DIRE TORS DISTRICT ND.It Rosen mclaMsen. Wlmien �Jt_ 11nmM E Lon �L Fred Damns,CNlman on,1. Gene Beyer r James M.Ferrymen James Weller Tames R. Sabel Leela PorwmR Roper Stamen N1111am G.Sooner p DIBTMC'T NO.L. L John Collins. Wmma. _ George Stall Z NNey,W.Warden. CMlrmen We tam Jelin M.Gufix. 1 Fond Banta Gene Beyer Z Bps Bell Deny Dena L ll c Carlin Malty MCWVNn J� IMMam D.Memory Jame N.Flow L Merle Moen No.Z.ECLamode Z Comes J.Nelson Glen Power Iry solar Tom Daly _ Mauel Police y_ ThemM E LUD y Roper Stanton Million G. Stainr y Gsorye L.Zakm _ SMlden Sine 011111110"no.SI gal A.Sagan,Chairman _ Don Meraez _ Bumie DUNap. CheMtan pre new „ CeneY J.NWwn i Gang.Brown Gwm A.Foreyths y Book Cardin _ Molly McCleralan Jell CWILb George Scot, Jame.V.Fan Maryle L.Rke James N.Flom William D.Melarey L Don R.GMfin AMa Brown Z Gail Kerry CeWlb L Apo Tlames E.LUD lbbert MoMNeon Z Fa G.Minr Welly tlm �L W pester I.Dely -L Jam Shia — Eerra Roeltellle Z Sheldon Sin., _— George L ZakM i Roper Stanton Wlllam G. secrer 1� Glades SYlvla Ronald Bates DLRTMCF NO.B: i Joint,C.Car,Jr..Chairmen Jan Deeey i Phil Sareose, Gelman pro tam Jan Direst, Z Name G.Sam er Roper Sermon DISTRK.T NO.Bt L Jerrew A.WaaW,Chairman Andar Parry L Evelyn Nan,Chloem pre tam Jolm C.Co..Jr. .A— NOW.G. Steven Roper Sbmon DISTRICT NO.7: f� Bang Ilemmend,Clalman Mike Wend i Jambe A.Werner,Chairman pa Now Mike Scmywr L Fad isomers _ Gen Beyer Z Jan DeleaY PNI Samore Ted Moore Mawl"Me i� Chedes E Ncken Tames N Saeealli L WJlbm G.Sta nr Roger Sum. DISTRICT NO. 11: Gace Wirchell,Claeman Farle R4Nbllle L Victor Leipzig, CMiman pro tam _ Jim Slha Z Roper SaMon VAIM.G.ScWnr DISTIIIR NO. 13: Jobe M.GOIba0n. Wtmlan Keay W.Wedow J Z Fad Banners,Clamor.pro tom Gem Beyer Glen Power Brawn Duraep In,solder Tom Dely L William G.Scanner Raper Stamen 9 D16111CT N0.14: L Peer A.Swen,Claitmen Darryl Milks l.a Fr e Paneou.. Winne.pro tam CNdss E Puckett B lelt L mtata Gene Beyb L Bent,Nammwd Mike Ward � Wlllbm G.Stelrer � super SbMOn -2- 11/10/93 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Carl E. Beach, Larry Berger, Catherine Biele, Pat Bourdy, Peter H. Brown, Mike Broyles, Glen Davidson, Bernie DeAnda, Doug 5. Dysart, Roy English, Scott Engstrom, Joseph Evans, Gary Hasenstab, Roy Hendy, Ed c Hodges, Dave Hodgson, Tom Hunt, Tod Jacobson, Glenn LaChance, Larry Lazorek, Joan M. Lebrun, Mark A. Legg, John Linder, James Lundy, Robert Morris, Margie Nellor, Charles E. Nichols, Karl Nordgren, Bob Ooten, Joseph Park, William Pierce, L. Ellen Ray, Rory Rea, Lynn Redman, Rudy M. Reyes, Rich Schlegel, Mary Simpson, Dale Eugene Sparks, John Spaulding, James Steffen, Mike Stromgren, James Tintle, Ed Torres, Linh Tran, Curt Van Shelp, Jack Vincent, Charles White, Larry Wigington, Alicha Wilkerson, Darlene Wilkerson, Michael Wilson, Jim Wybenga, Moyasar Yahya, Ray Young, Richard Young, Paula Zeller OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, David L. Hamilton, Chris Knap, Tom Nixon, Tom Prossen, Steven Sardegna, Phil Stone DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt re Board Appointment That the minute excerpt from the President of the Costa Mesa Sanitary District re appointment of James A. Wahner as alternate Director for James Ferryman in District No. 1 for the meeting of November 10, 1993, only, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized David Recognition of persons who wish to Hamilton, spokesman for the IUOE Local be heard on matters of general 501 Operating Engineers, who addressed interest the Boards in response to the most recent offer negotiations for a new Memorandum of Understanding for the Operations and Maintenance Employee Unit, urging the Boards to reconsider their position on meet and confer matters. -3- 11/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the Report of the Joint Chairman tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, November 17th, at 5:30 p.m f Joint Works Selection Committee - Thursday, November 18th, at 7:30 a.m u Personnel Committee - Thursday, November 18th, at 5:30 p.m. Special Ad Hoc Committee re Service to Outside Areas - Tuesday, November 23rd, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, December 1st, at 5:30 p.m. (Directors Phil Sansone and Jim Silva were also invited to attend.) ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel referred Directors to Report of the General Counsel two memoranda that were included in the Directors' folders that evening. The first memorandum is for information only regarding a number of changes on the Ralph M. Brown Act that the Governor and the State Legislature have approved. These changes will not become effective until April 1, 1994. Mr. Woodruff then stated that a more detailed report of their impact on the Districts would be provided in the near future. The second memorandum is a follow-up report requested by the Boards pertaining to Change Order No. 19, on Job No. P7-33. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. i 4 11/10/93 DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. e DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held October 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -5- 11/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. i 10/06/93 10/20/93 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 539,521 .98 $ 817,406.13 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,437,804.25 552,793.20 Joint Working Capital Fund - 135,522.65 174,048.73 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 4,070.44 26,621.08 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 103.60 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 3,569.99 3,586.41 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 44,349.92 25,591.72 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 3,400.45 92,621.67 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 42.75 41.97 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 27,122.51 487,471.71 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 438.65 7,582.49 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 0.00 17,141.77 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT 3,017.87 196,193.16 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,297.02 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 1,255.76 0.00 $2.203.517.84 S 2.401 .t 00.04 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Chlorine in Bulk. Specification No. C-030. to That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt DX Systems Company Resolution No. 93-143, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Chlorine in Bulk, Specification No. C-030, to DX Systems Company for the price of $407.70 per ton, including environmental excise tax, plus applicable sales tax, for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1993, with provision for four one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -6- 11/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Chlorine in One-Ton Cylinders. Soecification That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt No. C-031. to Continental Chemical Resolution No. 93-144, receiving and filing Comoanv bid tabulation and recommendation and ` awarding contract for Purchase of Chlorine in One-Ton Cylinders, Specification No. C-031, to Continental Chemical Company for the price of $345.00 per ton, plus environmental excise tax and all applicable + sales tax, for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1993, with provision for four one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chance Order No. 26 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 26 to the plans and No. J-19-1 specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing a net addition of $173,975.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for seven items of added or deleted work, granting a time extension of 59 calendar days for completion of said additional work and for a contract-specified bonus payment for 51 days early completion of certain work, based on the rate of $3,000.00 per day, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and No. P2-42-2 specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, authorizing a deduction of $54,000.00 from the contract with Margate Construction, Inc. for deletion of contractor's "All Risk" insurance requirement to be covered under the Districts' master policy at a savings, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and No. P1-38-2 specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-38-2, authorizing a deduction of $13,600.00 from the contract with Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for deletion of contractor's "All Risk" insurance requirement to be covered under the Districts' master policy at a savings, be, and is hereby, approved. -7- 11/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is Professional Services Agreement with hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum CH2M Hill re Job No. J-31 No. 1 to the Professional Services v Agreement with CH2M Hill for design and programming services required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring o and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31, providing for preparation of a study to review the existing Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system and recommend possible control system changes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue Change No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 59559 That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issued to TEAM Environmental issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order Services, Inc. No. 59559 issued to TEAM Environmental Services, Inc., providing for the conduction of air quality emissions testing on the waste digester gas flares at both plants in the amount of $16,481.44, increasing the total authorized amount from $13,350.00 to an amount not to exceed $29,831 .44. ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to extending temporary Specific Term Employment Agreements re Molecular Microbiology research work being conducted by the Districts' Laboratory Authorizing the General Manager to execute a new temporary Specific Term Employment Agreement with George Bonilla Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute a new temporary Specific Term Employment Agreement with George Bonilla, for an additional one-year period effective November 15, 1993, for an authorized maximum amount of $27,500.00. -8- 11/10/93 Authorizing the General Manager to execute a new temporary Specific Term Employment Agreement with Bich Tran 9 Moved, seconded and duly carried: r That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute a new temporary Specific Term Employment Agreement with Bich Tran, for an additional one-year period effective November 15, 1993, for an authorized maximum amount of $27,500.00. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Summons and Amended Complaint for Declaratory That the Summons and Amended Complaint Relief re litigation entitled Home for Declaratory Relief relative to litigation Insurance Company v. Brinderson entitled Home Insurance Company v. Corporation, et al.. U.S. District Brinderson Corporation, at al., U.S. District Court, Central District of California. Court, Central District of California, Case Case No. CV-93-3697 RWSL (JRxI No. CV-93-3697 RWSL (JRx), be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of staff in issuing Purchase Order No. 64943 to Matrix That the action of staff in issuing Purchase Services. Inc. (Specification Order No. 64943 to Matrix Services, Inc. in No. R-042) an amount not to exceed $60,346.00 plus applicable sales tax, for Emergency Repairs to Plant No. 2 Low Pressure Gas Holder (Specification No. R-042), be, and is hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive file and approve written resorts of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committee Committee and Executive Committee meetings held on October 20, 1993 and October 27, 1993, respectively, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -9- 11/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re implementing a Taxable Commercial Paper Program (TCPPI Directing staff and consulting_ financing team members to proceed with implementation of a $50 million TCPP Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and consulting financing team members be, and are hereby, directed to proceed with implementation of a $50 million Taxable Commercial Paper Program (TCPP). Approving Letter Agreement with Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe to serve as Special Counsel Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-145, approving Letter Agreement with Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe dated October 14, 1993 to serve as Special Counsel for said taxable commercial paper program for a fee not to exceed $30,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Approving Memorandum Agreement with Rourke Woodruff & Spradlin to serve as Co-Counsel Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Director hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-146, approving Memorandum Agreement with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin dated October 13, 1993 to serve as Co-Counsel for said taxable commercial paper program for a fee not to exceed $5,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -10- 11/10/93 Authorizing staff to secure the services of Moody's and Standard & Poor's Moved, seconded and duly carried: + That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to secure the services of Moody's and Standard & Poor's, in a total amount not to exceed $75,000.00, to determine whether the Districts can proceed with a TCPP using Districts' liquidity or whether obtaining a line of credit is necessary; and to obtain a short-term credit rating. Approving Letter Agreement with Lehman Brothers to provide banking services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Letter Agreement with Lehman Brothers to provide banking services for the TCPP for a 5.0 basis point commission, which is to be included in the all-in interest cost of the TCPP, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing preparation of the Air Quality Management Implementation That preparation of the Air Quality Plan as a supplement to the Districts' Management Implementation Plan as a 30-year "2020" VISION Wastewater supplement to the Districts' 30-year "2020" Management Action Plan VISION Wastewater Management Action Plan, be, and is hereby, authorized in the estimated amount of $150,000.00 for the in-house costs of Phase I and II of said plan; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to proceed with Phase I of said plan. _11_ 11/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Biofiltration Demonstration Proiect. amendina Boards' November 18. 1992 and April 14, 1993 actions r Approving amendments to reflect revised estimated project costs and funding Moved, seconded and duly carried: That amendments to the Biofiltration Demonstration Project authorizations to reflect revised estimated project costs and funding, be, and are hereby, approved as follows: Demonstration Proiect Budget Original Previous Existing Proposal Proposed Budget Item Authorization Revisions Authorization Revisions Authorization Staffing $ 62,000 $ 45,000 $107,000 $ 21,000 $128,000 Equipment 25,000 110,000) 15,000 15,000 Supplies 14,000 (5,000) 9,000 81000 17,000 Travel 5,000 5,000 5,000 Contracts 174,000 ( 0.3...0001 144,000 71,000 215,000 TOTALS 8 5280.000 105 0.000 5380.000 Demonstration Project Fundino Proposed Proposed Source Existing Revision Funding SCAQMD $125,000 $125,000 WERF 30,000 30,000 SCE 50,000 50,000 Subtotal Outside $205,D00 $205,000 Funding CSDOC 75,000 100.000 175,000 TOTAL S280.000 1 0 000 383 0.000 _12_ 11/10/93 Authorizina staff to procure additional contract analytical laboratory services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to procure the needed additional contract analytical laboratory services to conduct necessary testing pertaining to the Biofiltration Demonstration Projects, in accordance with established procurement policies. Authorizing the General Manager to execute an extension to the temporary Specific Term Employment Agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute an extension to the temporary Specific Term Employment Agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services, for an additional three and one-half months, for a revised total of fifteen and one-half months, increasing the authorized maximum from $45,000.00 to $58,000.00. -13- 11/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Public hearing and adoption of Ordinances Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees. Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges Public Hearing The Joint Chairman announced that this was the time and place fixed by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 and 14 for the public hearing on the following proposed Ordinances Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges: District Ordinance No. 1 122 2 217 3 320 5 529 6 623 7 730 11 1119 13 1313 14 1405 Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 7:46 p.m. Verbal report of General Counsel The Districts' General Counsel reported that the proposed ordinances, providing for adjustments to the source control, administrative, non-compliance sampling and miscellaneous charges, were introduced for first reading at the October Board meeting. He stated that no changes had been made. If adopted, the ordinances will take effect January 1, 1994. Close hearing There being no public comments, the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 7:47 p.m. -14- 11/10/93 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 122 That proposed Ordinance No. 122, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 122 by title only. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 122 following roll call vote: AYES: Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tem, Thomas E. Lutz, Thomas R. Saltarelli, Roger R. Stanton, James A. Wahner NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 122, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 217 That proposed Ordinance No. 217, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 217 by title only. -15- 11/10/93 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adootino Ordinance No. 217 following roll call vote: AYES: John Collins, Chairman, Fred Barrera, Bob Bell, Buck Catlin, Thomas E. Lutz, William D. Mahoney, Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickier, Roger R. Stanton, Hank Wedaa, George L. Zlaket NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: Maria Moreno That Ordinance No. 217, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 320 That proposed Ordinance No. 320, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 320 by title only. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adootino Ordinance No. 320 following roll call vote: AYES: Sal A. Sapien, Chairman, George Brown, Buck Catlin, John Collins, James Flora, Don Griffin, Gail Kerry, Thomas E. Lutz, Eva Miner, Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickier, Margie Rice, Jim Silva, Sheldon Singer, Roger R. Stanton, Charles Sylvia NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None -16- 11/10/93 That Ordinance No. 320, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 529 That proposed Ordinance No. 529, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 529 by title only. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adoptina Ordinance No. 529 following roll call vote: AYES: John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman, Phil Sansone, William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 529, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 623 That proposed Ordinance No. 623, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 623 by title only. -17- 11/10/93 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adoptina Ordinance No. 623 following roll call vote: AYES: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Evelyn Hart, William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 623, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 730 That proposed Ordinance No. 730, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 730 by title only. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 730 following roll call vote: AYES: Barry Hammond, Chairman, Fred Barrera, Jan Debay, Ted Moreno, Charles Puckett, William G. Steiner, James A. Wahner NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 730, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. -18- 11/10/93 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearina of proposed Ordinance No. 1119 That proposed Ordinance No. 1119, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 1119 by title only. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 1119 following roll call vote: AYES: Victor Leipzig, Chairman pro tem, Earle Robitaille, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1119, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 1313 That proposed Ordinance No. 1313, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 1313 by title only. -19- 11/10/93 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 1313 following roll call vote: AYES: John Gullixson, Chairman, Fred Barrera, Glenn Parker, Iry Pickier, William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1313, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 1405 That proposed Ordinance No. 1405, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 1405 by title only. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 1405 following roll call vote: AYES: Peer A. Swan, Chairman, Fred Barrera, Barry Hammond, Leslie Pontious, William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1405, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be, and is hereby, adopted. -20- 11/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Public hearing and adoption of Ordinances Establishina Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers Public Hearing The Joint Chairman announced that this was the time and place fixed by the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for the public hearing on the following proposed Ordinances Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers: District Ordinance No. 1 123 2 218 3 321 5 530 6 624 7 731 11 1120 13 1314 14 1406 Open Public Hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 7:50 p.m. Verbal report of General Counsel The Districts' General Counsel reported that the proposed ordinances, providing for adjustments in the annual fees relative to the industrial and wastehauler dischargers and making clerical corrections on existing ordinances, were introduced for first reading at the October Board meeting. He stated that no changes had been made. If adopted, the ordinances will take effect January 1, 1994. Close hearina There being no public comments, the Chairman declared the hearing closed at 7:51 p.m. 21 11/10/93 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 123 That proposed Ordinance No. 123, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 123 by title only. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 123 following roll call vote: AYES: Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tem, Thomas E. Lutz, Thomas R. Saltarelli, Roger R. Stanton, James A. Wahner NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 123, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 218 That proposed Ordinance No. 218, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 218 by title only. -22- 11/10/93 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adoptino Ordinance No. 218 following roll call vote: AYES: John Collins, Chairman, Fred Barrera, Bob Bell, Buck Catlin, Thomas E. Lutz, William D. Mahoney, Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickler, Roger R. Stanton, Hank Wedaa, George L. Zlaket NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: Maria Moreno That Ordinance No. 218, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of Proposed Ordinance No. 321 That proposed Ordinance No. 321, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 321 by title only. -23- 11/10/93 DISTRICT 3 - Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 321 following roll call vote: AYES: Sal A. Sapien, Chairman, George Brown, Buck Catlin, John Collins, James Flora, Don Griffin, Gail Kerry, Thomas E. Lutz, - ' Eva Miner, Carrey J. Nelson, Iry Pickier, Margie Rice, Jim Silva, Sheldon Singer, Roger R. Stanton, Charles Sylvia NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 321, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 530 That proposed Ordinance No. 530, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 530 by title only. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 530 following roll call vote: AYES: John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman, Phil Sansone, William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 530, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be, and is hereby, adopted. -24- 11/10/93 DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 624 That proposed Ordinance No. 624, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 624 by title only. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 624 following roll call vote: AYES: James A. Wahner, Chairman, Evelyn Hart, William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 624, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 731 That proposed Ordinance No. 731, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 731 by title only. -25- 11/10/93 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 731 following roll call vote: AYES: Barry Hammond, Chairman, Fred Barrera, Jan Debay, Ted Moreno, Charles Puckett, William G. Steiner, James A. Wahner NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 731, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearina of oroposed Ordinance No. 1120 That proposed Ordinance No. 1120, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 1120 by title only. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 1120 following roll call vote: AYES: Victor Leipzig, Chairman pro tem, Earle Robitaille, Roger R. Stanton NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1120, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be, and is hereby, adopted. -26- 11/10/93 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 1314 That proposed Ordinance No. 1314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 1314 by title only. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 1314 following roll call vote: AYES: John Gullixson, Chairman, Fred Barrera, Glenn Parker, Iry Pickler, William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be, and is hereby, adopted. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Second hearing of proposed Ordinance No. 1406 That proposed Ordinance No. 1406, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the second reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived, whereupon the Assistant Secretary read Ordinance No. 1406 by title only. -27- 11/10/93 DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Adopting Ordinance No. 1406 following roll call vote: AYES: Peer A. Swan, Chairman, Fred Barrera, Barry Hammond, Leslie Pontious, William G. Steiner NOES: None ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: None That Ordinance No. 1406, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be, and is hereby, adopted. ALL DISTRICTS Director Catlin recommended that all Receive file and approve written Directors read the Committee's report on the report of the Conservation Recycle proposed joint water reclamation project and Reuse Committee with the Orange County Water District as it was one of the most imaginative projects to use reclaimed water and would make a great deal of difference in the County's use of water. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee meeting held on October 28, 1993, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that based Actions re term and compensation on a request to consider a term limit for the for the post of Joint Chairman post of Joint Chairman at the last Board meeting, and the recent publicity about the established compensation for the Joint Chairman, this matter had been scheduled for general discussion on both the issue of limitation of terms to be served by the Joint Chairman and compensation to be paid to the Joint Chairman. Joint Chairman Mahoney indicated that in view of his current position as the Joint Chairman, he would not actively participate in the discussion. Discussion then followed by the Directors. Several Directors addressed this issue and noted certain advantages to having the experience of a two-year tenure as Joint Chairman as part of the continuing general Directorship, and to have new personnel assume the leadership role provided a greater depth of experience and insight for the benefit of all members. -28- 11/10/93 It was then moved, seconded and duly carried that the terms to be served by the Joint Chairman should be limited to two consecutive elected terms. The General Counsel was directed to draft a resolution to effect the change for the Executive Committee's review and submittal to the Boards. The Joint Chairman then entertained a discussion among the Directors on the issue of compensation. Considerable extended discussion followed with comments and suggestions being put forth by most all Directors. A motion was then made and seconded to refer this matter to the Executive Committee. A substitute motion was then made to reaffirm the provisions of existing Resolution No. 86-152, wherein the Joint Chairman receives the compensation of $100.00 per meeting from each of the nine Districts when the Districts are convened in joint session. Further discussion followed, including remarks that the extensive work required by the Joint Chairman which is not compensated in any respect, such as telephone conferences and meetings with the management staff, reflect a considerable time requirement to be expended by the Joint Chairman, and therefore the existing Resolution is an accurate reflection of value. Comments were expressed that the total amount to be paid for the joint meetings may exceed reasonable limits, and it should be reviewed and studied. A second substitute motion was then made to appoint an Ad Hoc Committee to study this issue and report to the Executive Committee and Joint Boards. Further comments followed, including suggestions that the Ad Hoc.Committee be comprised of the respective Chairmen from the nine Districts. The maker of the substitute motion agreed to revise the substitute motion to reflect the suggestion that the Ad Hoc Committee be so composed. Concern was expressed as to whether the present Resolution authorized the Vice Joint Chairman, when acting in the place of the Joint Chairman, would also be entitled to receive the joint compensation from each District. General Counsel remarked that if, in fact, the Vice Joint Chairman was assuming all of the duties of the Joint Chairman, in his opinion, it would qualify that person to receive the joint compensation for the joint meeting. Counsel noted that there were only a couple of instances in the past where the Vice Joint Chairman received it, most recently due to the injury-related disability of the Joint Chairman for a few months. Comments were also expressed indicating a desire to have newer members of the Boards sit as part of the Ad Hoc Committee A further modification of the second substitute motion was then made to have the current Vice Joint Chairman appoint a special Ad Hoc Committee to review the existing Resolution and to make recommendations to the Executive Committee and then to the Joint Boards. _29_ 11/10/93 After further discussion, the substitute motion to form an Ad Hoc Committee was disapproved by all Districts, with a combined vote of 10 ayes and 30 nays. The question was called for voting on the substitute motion to reaffirm Resolution No. 86-152. A roll call vote was taken; the motion was approved by Districts Nos. 5 and 14. District No. 7 resulted in a tie vote, and the motion was disapproved by Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 11 and 13. General Counsel advised that the effect of the disapproval of the motion was nonetheless to have Resolution No. 86-152 remain in place. He further advised it would take a specific motion to repeal Resolution No. 86-152 in order to negate all of those existing provisions. Following a call for the question on the motion to refer the matter back to the Executive Committee, said motion failed by voice vote. A motion to table the matter was then moved and seconded. The motion failed on a combined vote of 15 ayes, 20 nays and 2 abstentions. A new motion was then moved and seconded to repeal Section 4 of Resolution No. 86-152 relating to the payment to the Joint Chairman of the sum of $100.00 by each District for joint meetings of the Boards. By combined voice vote, that motion failed. The Joint Chairman then announced that in view of the lack of consensus on any of the above motions, he was thereby appointing Director Buck Catlin to Chair an Ad Hoc Committee, with directions for Director Catlin to solicit volunteer participation on the Committee, and to make the appointments and to undertake a report to present to the Joint Boards at the earliest possible date. ALL DISTRICTS The Director of Engineering reported that in Awarding contract for Phase I October, the Directors authorized the Wastehauler Dumping Facilities General Manager to solicit bids and award a Modifications. Job No. P7-46-1 . to contract to the low bidder in an amount not Dorado Enterprises. Inc. to exceed $200,000.00 for construction of Phase 1 Wastehauler Pumping Facilities, Job No. P1-46-1 . Mr. Dawes stated that on November 2, 1993, five bids were received. The low bid received was greater than the authorized amount. The bids ranged from a high of $493,308.00 to a low of $248,953,00 submitted by Dorado Enterprises, Inc., which was higher than the engineer's estimate of $200,000.00 because of the addition of a flushing system to the plans and specifications to help eliminate clogging of the systems and reduce odors. He then reported that staff recommended award to Dorado Enterprises, Inc. for their low bid of $248,953.00. -30- 11/10/93 It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-150, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Phase I Wastehauler Dumping Facilities Modifications, Job No. P1-46-1, to Dorado . Enterprises, Inc., in the total amount of $248,953.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Annual Audit Report submitted by KPMG Peat Marwick, That the Annual Audit Report submitted by Certified Public Accountants KPMG Peat Marwick, Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1993, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and No. 11-17-1 specifications for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1, authorizing a deduction of $27,625.00 from the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich & Sons for deletion of contractor's "All Risk" insurance requirement to be covered under the Districts' master policy at a savings, be, and is hereby, approved. -31- 11/10/93 DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoorovina Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt John Carollo Engineers for Phase I Resolution No. 93-147, approving Preliminary Project Report re Contract Addendum No. 2 to the Professional ' No. 11-17 Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Phase 1 Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $694,121.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: AAd4ournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoorovina Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company That the Board of Directors hereby adopts re Contract No. 5-36 Resolution No. 93-148-5, approving and authorizing execution of a Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for facilities necessary to provide electrical service to Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Journment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: _ Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:21 p.m. -32- 11/10/93 DISTRICTS 6. 7 & 14 The Director of Engineering reported that Aoorovina plans and specifications since the formation of County Sanitation for Baker-Gisler Interceptor. from District No. 14, Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, Fairview Road to Plant No. 1. 7 and 14 have been working toward the Contract No. 14-1-1A completion of a joint sewage conveyance system which will deliver wastewater from portions of the communities of Irvine, Costa Mesa and Santa Ana to Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. In December 1986, the Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for preparation of a Project Report for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-1A, from the Main Street Pump Station located in the John Wayne Airport clear zone, to Reclamation Plant No. 1 . The agreement was subsequently modified to include design, construction and other services. In accordance with that agreement, four of six construction contracts (from Bristol Street to Fairview Road, Main Street to Bristol Street, and two in the vicinity of the Santa Ana River) have been completed. The fifth of six contracts is now ready for bidding. Mr. Dawes further reported that the two remaining projects included in this contract, the reach from Fairview Road to the Greenville-Banning Channel and a future District No. 6 collector extending southerly in Fairview Road from the Paularino Channel to Wilson Street, are scheduled for construction in 1996. He also stated that Contract No. 14-1-1A includes the construction of a 90-inch reinforced concrete pipe sewer (RCP), between Fairview Road at Baker Street and the Santa Ana River (approximately 10,500 feet) and approximately 760 feet of 6 feet by 8 feet RC box sewer through the Mesa Verde Country Club. Within the above reach, two private easements have been acquired after years of negotiation, and a revised (Supplement No. 2) Environmental Impact Report was prepared. One easement is through the Sanwa Bank property site and the other is for the construction of the reinforced concrete box (equivalent in size to the 90-inch RCP) within the Mesa Verde Country Club and Golf Course, immediately south of Gisler Avenue and east of the Santa Ana River. The Settlement and Release Agreement for the acquisition of the Mesa Verde Country Club easement was fully executed in March 1993. For the Sanwa Bank property easement, a revised Stipulation for Entry of Judgment and Judgment was prepared by Districts' counsel and submitted in September 1993 to the Superior Court of California for a judgment in condemnation. (If the settlement agreement with Sanwa is delayed, the project will be delayed.) Settlement agreements with both Sanwa Bank and Mesa Verde Country Club dictate strict scheduling window periods for construction that the Districts must comply with. A penalty and liquidated damages clause has been included to accomplish this goal. Mr. Dawes then stated that staff recommended approval of the plans and specifications and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Contract No. 14-1-1A, subject to final acquisition of the Sanwa easement. The engineer's estimate for this project is $11,000,000. -33- 11/10/93 It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-149, approving plans and specifications for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1 A, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids subject to approval of the condemnation settlement agreement with Sanwa Bank by the Court. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:25 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:25 p.m. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:25 p.m. /J-'� Z4 Assistant Sec r t ry of t Boards of Directors of County San tion Dis ricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -34- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/30/93 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/C6/93 POSTING DATE 16/06/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DCSCRIPTION 132693 ADCOA $52.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132694 AS TECH COMPANY 356.71b.b7 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 132695 AMERICAN TELEPHONE A TELEGRAPH 51Y256.BB LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 132696 A T f T $2.7.56 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 132697 ACAOLMIC PRESS $89.78 PUBLICATION 132698 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $119.76 SAFETY SUPPLIES 132699 AIR PRODUCTS 6 CHEMICAL IN S1T.432.40 OAK AGREEMENT GET GEN. SYST M.0.8-9-89 132760 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT s172.08 ASPHALT 1327D1 ALTA - ROBBINS 4153.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 132702 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH 675.O4 ALARM SYSTEM REPAIRS 132703 KETEMA INC 11.113.16 MECHANICAL PARTS 132704 AMICON. INC sbIT.29 LAB SUPPLIES 232705 ANAHEIM SAW SHOP INC 3134.15 TOOL PARTS 132706 ANTHONY PEST CONINOL $415.04 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 132707 A-PLUS SYSTEMS S2.217.0C NOTICES A ADS 132708 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS INC s970.56 LAB SUPPLIES 132709 ABC LABORATORIES i1.395.0G LAB SERVICES 132710 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC 31,335.21 INSTRUMENT PARTS m 232711 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC S5.150.VU WASTE HAULING FEE 3K 132712 ASHBROOK - SIMON - HARTLEY $8.727.75 TEST UNIT s 132713 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO f630.eE LAB SUPPLIES W 132714 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 13.933.56 PAYROLL SERVICES 132715 AUTOMATION CONTROLS 31.180.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132716 BKK LANDFILL $4.108.55 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.10-9-91 n 132727 RAW SAFETY A SUPFLV si Ts.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES 132728 BARCLAYS LAW PUbL1SHERS 97..V0 PUBLICATION .� 132719 BASIC REASONING INST. 4391.93 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132720 BATTER, SPECIALTIES 37.46 BATTERIES 232721 BAUER COMPRESSOR SBb.b9 COMPRESSOR PARTS 132722 BATTER DIAb NOST1CS INC 88.866.Ou LAB SUPPLIES 132723 BIG TEX TRAILERS $1.429.28 PORTABLE EQUIPMENT 132724 BIOMERIEUX VITEK INC 1524.4. LAB SUPPLIES 132725 010 TECH NET, INC S1.2b SERVICE AGREEMENT 132726 BLACK A VEATCH $21.914.87 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.7-14-93 132721 BLOOMBERG L.P. $4,913.43 FINANCIAL MONITOR M.0.4-14-93 132728 BOISE CASCADE OFC PRODUCTS $4,601.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES - 132729 bON-A-RUES $232.33 TRUCK PARTS 132730 BRENNER-FIEDLER S ASSOC 1N s72.1D LAB SUPPLIES 132731 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC $7.196.6C SURVEYING UMEN SERVICSS M.0.6-10-92 132733 C M i s10B.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132733 CS COMPANY $3.2Tb.01 132734 CRTC-CWPCA INC 5760.66 VALVES 132735 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO INC S237.69 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 132737 CALIFOL INC Sb2.i3 MECHANICAL APARV GREEMENT 132738 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC INE GALE f4B5.18 SERVICE ING SERVI 132738 JOMN CAR OLEO ENGINEERS f321.769.18 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38, J-33 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YGRKIN6 CAHITAL PROCESSINY DATE 9/30/93 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID lt/96/93 POSTING DATE 16/06/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132139 CASHCO $491.60 VALVES 132740 CEILCOTE $7.700.00 FAN 132741 CENTREFOINT COMMERCIAL TNT 6217.69 OFFICE FURNITURE 132742 CENTURY SAFETY INST G SUPP S1.982.85 SAFETY SUPPLIEB 132744 COLS-PARKER INSTRUMENT CO f1.566.25 MLABECHANICAL SUPPLIES 132745 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 6695.G6 MECHANICAL REPAIR6 232746 COMPUTER OAT ALOM f2.658.36 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 332746 CONNELL INC. a2.768.18 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 132748 CONSOLL GM PARES / DIY W204.98 TRUCK PARTS 132749 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL D15T SiO.285.01 TOOLSELECTRIC SUPPLIES 132750 CONTINENTAL AIR CALLS INC i629.75 TOOLS 132751 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 3Y.646.75 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 132752 CONTRACTOR-SCON BOON STORE 6222.50 BOONS 132753 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O C s$1.551.44 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9 132754 COOPER INO USTRIES INC 31$446.06 CNGINE PARTS 132756 CORELSTA COSP.TA 3$60.43 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 132755 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 660.43 TRUCK PARTS 1325 COSTAR 5346.96 LAB SUPPLIES 132157 R E COULTER ER CRANE RENTAL 63.N20.40 RENTAL EQUIPMENT >< X 132759 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC S2.890.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 2 132766 J.Y. LSAN GELD CO INC 4163.22 FITTINGS 132761 DAPPER LIRE SERVICE .135.25 TIRES 132762 DAPREN TIRO f3$312.99 TIRES 132763 UATRON PERT PN EN AL 6312.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132764 MSK/DECKER $223.66 GAUGE � 132769 DEPENDABLE Ofi-p4A0 INC s22].99 N 232765 DIFILIPPA ASSOCIATES $153.54 PRINTING PARTS 132766 016I TAL EBUIP ME NT CORP $13.899.17 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 132767 DIONEN CORP. .104.6. FREIGHT 132766 DISCO PRINT COMPANY 4142.31 OFFICE SUPPLIEB 132769 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN i350.CL TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 132770 DOMAN ELECTRIC INC 617.277.24 ELECTRIC SERVICES 132771 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC f19.150.04 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 132772 ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC 32.011.04 INSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR 132773 DUNN EDNARDS CORE $261.78 PAINT SUPPLIES 132774 D-VALS SALES 1215.43 FITTINGS 132775 ESP NORTH 3222.49 TOOLS 132776 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING S3V2.65 HARDWARE 132777 EASTMAN INC f1.739.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132778 EDWARDS DIV. OF GS OLDS SYS. $5.005.30 MACHINE SUPPLIES 132779 ENCHANTER INC .5.600.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 13278B ENVINEA $1.416.04 MECHANICAL PARTS 132781 ENVIRONETICS. INC 33.924.13 LAB SUPPLIES 132782 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC 5317.14 LAB SERVICES 1-2783 ESSENCE GROUP 5436.84 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 132184 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 12,600.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL - PROCESSING DATE 9130/93 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/06/93 POSTING DATE 10/06/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AhOUNT DESCRIPTION 132765 FAX PRESS 652.69 OFFICE SUPPLIER 132786 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 31.387.5E AIR FREIGHT 132787 FENAELLVAS S6b.1L PROPANE 132788 CHENWEST INC 51.614.75 BUILDING SUPPLIES 132789 FISCHER f PORTEN CO 94,159.47 CHLORINATION PARTS 132790 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 3390.bi LAB SUPPLIES 132791 FISONS INSTRUMENTS S10E.23 LAB SUPPLIES 132792 FLO-SYSTEMS 92.9b6.04 PIMP PARTS 132793 FOSS ENVIRONMENTAL 693.5. FREIGHT 132794 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 1163.92 FILM 132795 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $14.276.57 WATER USAGE 132796 THE FOXBORO CU s326.22 7N3TRUMENT-PARTS 132797 GET. INC. f2.u13.22 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132798 GANAHI LUMBER CO 65i.34 LUMBER 332799 GENERAL BINDING CORP 42C9.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132600 GENERAL ELECTRIC CORFORATION 956,174.00 CONSTRUCTION J-15A 132801 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 6380.97 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 132RC2 GENERAL TELEPHONE. CO f465.71 TELEPHONE SERVICES X 1328C3 61ERLICH-MITCHELL INC $6..56.i9 MECHANICAL PARTS 1328C4 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $731.62 2 COMPUTER HICSOFTWARE SUPPLI68 132806 GRAPH PAD f2V.57 COMPUTER SOFTWARE C77 132806 HACH COMPANY 137.09 LAB StlPPLIE3 132808 HATCH 6 KINK 1NC 3137.09 TOOLS 1320C9 PL ARDN CO INC 34.565.75 ELECTRIC PARTS a 132610 HELLO iNOI SIRA INCR/MApIN! s4.560.WG MECHANICAL PARTS 1 132811 HELLO 5164.06 OFFICE EQUIPMENT W 132812 HILTI INC 3682.5G TOOLS 13281 HOLMES SCIENTIFIC INSTR. f1.18 7.9: LAB SUPPLIES 132813 NOLNES f NRPVER INC 547.559.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-44 132614 RS HUGHES CO INC 6982.L4 PAINT SUPPLIES 132815 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BERCH f2:.983.24 PERMIT FEES 132916 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER SIX f12.84 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132817 HUNTINGTON VALLEY TOOL 5132.04 TOOLS 132028 MUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C 6102.91 BICYCLE PARTS 132819 HTORACON COMPANY $01.71 LAB SUPPLIES 13282C IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL f32.401.17 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92 132821 INDUSYKIAL THREADED PRODUCTS f241.29 CONNECTORS 132822 INFILCJ OE6REMONT INC 5197.05 FREIGHT 132923 INGRAM PAPER 14.9.61 132624 META V140.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES BOOR 132826 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 1794.49 BATTERIES 132827 GREAT WESTERN NDSCAP SANITARY SUFP 1900.65 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 132928 JAPAN LANDSCAPING INC 6500.0E LANDSCAPING SERVICES E 132829 JAYS CATERING 5314.97 INSTRUMENT MEETING EXPENSES 132836 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO f3.605.46 INSTRUMENT PARTS :J2B]G THE MCITH COMPANIES 3B9B.15 g8OINEERING SERVICES 3-36p FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PNOCESS1Nb DATE 9/33193 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/66/93 POSTING UATE 10/G6/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OESCRIPTION 132831 NIMMERLE BROS INC 3433.72 MECHANICAL PARTS 132832 KING BEARING INC 51.638.34 MACHINE SUPPLIES 132833 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $1.601.32 HARDRARR 132834 L.P.S. INCORPORATED 4984.b4 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132835 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO P69.81 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 132836 LAYMAN. JGNES G DIE, LAYYEHS $3.598.u0 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.5-13-92 132R37 LAYTON INTERNATIONAL $1,101.13 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 132838 LXBOUEF COMPANY INC 314.669.LL PUMP STATION ABANDONMENT - RED HILL 132839 LEE L RO CONSULTING ENSR a51.38h.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5 132640 SOCU-LYNCH CORP 1712.7E 1 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 32041 MPS 3320.6E 132842 MACOMCO 3859.78 SERVICE SERVICES 232843 HAS SYSTEMS S4.2C3.32 SERVICE AGREEMENT 132844 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION INC 3452.371.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2 132645 MARVAC ELECTRONICS illb.37 132846 MATT - CHLOR INC 1e.448.5b INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 132847 D A MATTHEWS 6 ASSOCIATES $4.231.15 _ 132848 KETEMA 3149.51 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES fll MECHANICAL PARTS X 132850 MIDWAY MFG L MACHINING iS.e55.46 PUMP PARTS = 132851 MISSION I COST/WATERS CNkOMA 0 ,993.23 LAB UNIFORM RENT 132852 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.993.23 UNIFORM RENTALS Ib 1J2852 nITCH[LL INTERNATIONAL INC a128.23 PUBLICATION 132853 MOORE INDUSTRIES $384.91 ELECTRIC PARTS 132854 MOTOMOLA INC S374.37 PAGER RENTALS n 132855 NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS S1.G25.15 BOOKS I 232956 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC 61.125.00 132857 NEAL SUPPLY CO $387.96 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE 132658 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $4.19 PLUMBING SUPPLIES RATER USAGE 132859 DX SYSTEMS CO 935.143.09 132860 ORACLE CORPORATION 1968.94 CHLORINE COMPUTER SOFTWARE AE 232862 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO FARTS C 3137.55 TRUCK PARTS 232863 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL Cb s1$608.13 CHEMICALS 132863 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY C s808.11 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 132B 64 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE 11.466.82 ELECTRIC PARTS 132865 ORANGE COURIER 5267.JO FREIGHT 132866 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING Cu. $1.223.51 FITTINGS 132867 OXYGEN SERVICE S2r442.3J SPECIALTY GASES 132868 P&C SCIENTIFICS CORPORATION $56.29 LAB SUPPLIES 132869 P R L LABS 3114.10 LAB SUPPLIES 232870 PACIFIC FUBLISHERS 387.u0 PUBLICATION 132871 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT LU S1a299.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES 132872 PACIFIC BELL $641.52 TELEPHONE SERVICES 132873 PACIFIC WALK-IN MEDICAL a12u.06 MEDICAL EXAMS 232674 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPP 13.689.u4 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 132675 PARAGON CABLE $36.76 CABLE SERVICES 132976 PARAMOUNT TANK INC 1691.07 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING PATE 9/30193 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAIL 16/06/93 POSTINb DATE 10/06/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132977 PARTS UNLIMITED f369.5b TRUCK PARTS 132878 PASCAL A LUDW16 339.097.BC CONSTRUCTION J-32 132879 PIMA SRO. SYSTEMS INC $226.742.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 132880 PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP $183.19 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 132891 POLTPURE INC si:.887.71 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 132882 POLYSPEDE - 450.83 ELECTRIC PARTS 132983 POSTAGE BY PHONE s5rL60.06 POSTAGE 132884 POWER ELECTNO SUPPLY CO 1396.72 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 132985 POWER SYSTEMS $2,992.32 TRUCK PARTS 132086 PREMIUM CONNECTING POINT 3569.88 OFFICE MACHINE 132887 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 3V29.00 ICE 132880 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. f5r200.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 132809 QUANTUM CHEMICAL U51 DIV. $122.24 LAB SUPPLIES 132896 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES INC s66r893.16 COMPUTER SERVICES 132691 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS 2120.0J ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 132892 H 6 R INSTRUMENTS 11.651.54 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 132893 RAACU INC $5.300.19 COMPUTER SOFTWARE LICENCE 132894 RD SYSTEMS INC s1r815.59 SECURITY SYSTEM - CARD READER m 132895 RED LION INN $200.56 X 132896 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY 32r261.85 TRAINING REGISTRATION 132897 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CORP 5602.28 PLUMBING SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES 00 13289E RESTER CORP $133.88 LAB SUPPLIES 132900 RGCCOrS TRUCK WRECKING 5215.5E TRUCK PARTS 132901 ROSEMOUNT AMA. $952.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS y 132902 JOSEMULNT ANALYTICAL 3199.72 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1 232903 JOSE PN T 1STIC N S SON IN s14123.75 METAL 132904 SAC (SYNERGISTIC PERT. CORP) $900.08 LAB SUPPLIES 132905 SANCON ENGINEERING AL INC $900.00 ENGINEERING SBRVIC88 1329CG SANTA FE VISUSTRIAL PLASTICS S3$375.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 132947 DOUG SAP YIS s375.00 CPR/FIRST AIO TSAININO 132908 SCIENTIFIC ELECTRONICS SCPV. f1.947.76 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132908 SEAMED A CORP S156.54 LAB OFFICE FURNITURE 132916 SEA COAST DESIGNS $:r3T8.12 OFFICE FURNITURE 13291E SHAMROCK SUPPLY 4b93. 1 PAINT SUPPLIES 13291 SHURELUDK SALES $B r392.81 MRCHANICAL PARRS 132912 SOUTHER WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI . 5 PRE-BNPLOYMENT PHYSICAL BEAMS 132913 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 125.455r955.15 POWER 13291E SO CAL GAS CO S75r65b.45 NATURAL GAS 132925 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL Cu 413,999.98 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 132916 YESTALLOY INC $1,395.79 WELDING SUPPLIES 132917 GARY G STRECD s3.b:2.31 PETTY CASH REIHB., TRAVEL 6 TRAINING 132918 SUN ELECTRIC CORP $188.12 TRUCK PART 132919 SUPER CHEM CORP $379.87 CHEMICALS 132920 SUPER ICE COHP 393.90 ICE 132921 MAMIN TALEBI $849.94 LIABILITY CLAIM 132922 TAYLOR-OUAN IN 6 COMPANY $22E.85 ELECTRIC CART PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSINb DATE 9/30/93 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/06/93 POSTING DATE 10/06/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132923 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD f7.431.b6 TRUCK PARTS 132924 CHARLES E THOMAS 11.947.52 TRUCK PARTS 132925 TOLEDO SCALE CORF . $930.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT 132926 TONY'S LOCK a SAFE SERVICE $234.9V LOCKS 6 KEYS 132927 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES s318.uU TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.7-14-93 132928 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY INL $17.74 TRUCK PARTS 132929 JG TUCKER S SON INC 5760.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132930 US AUTO GLASS CENTERS $346.75 TRUCK PARTS 132931 UVP. INC f6.L06.44 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 132932 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC 455L..L LAB SUPPLIES 132933 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $257.02 PARCEL SERVICES 132934 UNITED TAPE CORPORATION $42.91 VIDEO SUPPLIES 132935 VYN SCIENTIFIC $3,248.17 LAB SUPPLIES 13293b VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 32.637.G3 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 132937 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $3.543.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132938 VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC f18.616.35 LAB SUPPLIES 132939 VERNE-S PLUMBING $607.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 132940 VERTEX SYSTEMS 4390.OG .rl 232941 K.N. WATTS CO $183.77 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT ELECTRIC PARTS 132942 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT S799.0: ^'1 SAFETY eS 13294 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY f30 . CAUSTIC SODA M. 0.8-12-92 bC 132944 VESCO $988.23 BP PART 132945 WITL6 f353.42 132916 ROURKE 8 WOODRUFF B SPPAULIN fbT.L15.87 LAB LEGALPPLIES SERVICES 132947 XEROX CORP 5183.60 COPIR LEASES M.0.2-19-92 INSTRUMENT LEASES i 132949 GIORGI SARONGS CO sa.$32.97 METER PARTS CT 132950 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT C f32.97 CONSTRUCTION PARTS 132950 ZIEBARiM 0 ALF LR/C.S. ALP ER ------T9.Lb CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 _________________ - TOTAL CLAIMS PAIL 14/Cb/93 $2,203,517.64 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/30/93 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/06/93 POSTING DATE 10/06/93 SUMMARY AMOUNT /1 OPER FUND $103.60 /2 OPER FUND $757.99 42 CAP FAC FUND $2,812.00 03 OPER FUND $37,945.19 03 CAP FAC FUND $6,404.73 /5 OPER FUND $1,202.75 I5 CAP FAC FUND $2,197.70 /6 OPER FUND $42.75 I7 OPEN FUND $2,453.51 i7 CAP PAC FUND $24,669.00 Ill OPEN FUND $83.15 Ill CAP FAC FUND $355.50 /566 OPEN FUND $3,017.87 /6A7 OPEN FUND $3,297.02 I704 OPER FUND $1,255.76 m JT OPER FUND $539,521.98 X CORP $1,437,804.25 = SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $4,070.44 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $135,522.65 ------------- 1 $2,203,517 84 V FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13193 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CGUNTV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/2L/93 POSTING DATE 10/26/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132983 AS TECH COMPANY $59.957.93 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 132994 AST RESEARCH i1.547.90 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 132985 A T 6 T 3.99.46 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 132986 AARON BROTHERS ART MARTS $80.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132961 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC 3340.00 LAB SERVICES 132908 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP 922.073.72 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.11-18-92 132989 ADVANSTAR EXPOSITIONS 5310.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION M.O.7-14-93 132990 AIR PRODUCTS S CHEMICAL IN $17,432.00 O&M AGREEMENT CRY OEM SINT M.O.8-9-89 132991 AMERICAN DATA CORP. SSJ6.58 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 132992 AMERICAN METAL BEARING CO s216.80 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 132993 AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTN 5101.75 LAB SUPPLIES 132994 ANALYSTS INC 31.650.0L MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 132995 ANDERSEN SAMPLER CO 54.B51.5G ELECTRIC PARTS 132996 ANIXTER - DISTRIBUTION $2.948.44 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 132997 ANTHONY-S NECH S MACHINE. INC. X306.71 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 132998 A-PLUS SYSTEMS sb35.54 NOTICES A ADS 132999 APPLIED SIOSYSTENS INC $606.86 LAB SUPPLIES 133000 ABC LABORATORIES s235.40 LAB SERVICES 133001 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT s148.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS X 133002 ARMOR - VAC $360.40 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES = 133003 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC 34.550.G4 WASTE HAULING 333004 AMSA $353.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION M.O.7-14-93 b0 133005 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CD s230.63 LAB SUPPLIES 133006 AUTOMATION CONTROLS s482.48 INSTRUMENT PARTS 133007 A ANDS S INOPHIES 464.43 AWARD PLAQUES by 133018 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC $127.36 LAB SUPPLIES I 133009 IF] FOR IABLE SERVICES $166.65 RENTAL EQUIPMENT .-' 133010 BAR LANDFILL $3,746.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91 133011 BRW SAFETY S SUPPLY $916.43 SAFETY SUPPLIES 133012 BANANA BLULPRINT $9.V76.3b BLUEPRINTING SERVICES 133013 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $747.61 BATTERIES 133014 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 54.404.78 LAB SUPPLIES 133015 BEHR PROCESS CORP $424.89 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 133016 J S H BERGE INC s479.i: LAB SUPPLIES 133617 BEST WESTERN SANTA ANA S2.Ull.56 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 133018 BIOMERIEUX VITEK INC s44:.bA LAB SUPPLIES 133019 BID VENTURLS INC 5162.L0 LAB SUPPLIES 133026 BLOOMBERG L.P. $36U.79 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.O. 4-14-93 133G21 BON-A-RUES 3328.08 TRUCK PARTS 133622 00VLE ENGINEERING CORP $103,909.45 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-17, 7-18, 7-19 133023 BNI HOOKS $271.70 PUBLICATION 133024 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE $141.34 PUBLICATION 133025 BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $375.4L SUBSCRIPTION 133026 C M I s1.466.2L METER 133027 CS COMPANY 17G.67 VALVE 133028 CALTROL INC 11.575.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINb DATE 10/13/93 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/20/93 POSTING DATE 16/26/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 133029 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE 3179.63 SERVICE AGREEMENT 133030 CALIFORNIA SUPRESSION SYSTEM ab0O.60 SAFETY SUPPLIES 133031 CASHCO fe03.18 VALVE PARTS 133032 CEDKO ELECTRONICS 31.20b.06 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 133033 CEILCOTE 3271.76 ELECTRIC FAN 133034 CENTURY SAFETY INST E SUPP 320,040.29 SAFETY SUPPLIES 133035 CETAC TECHNOLOGIES INC f586.61 LAS SUPPLIES 133036 COAST PNEUMATICS 3139.39 ELECTRIC PARTS 133037 COASTAL COMMUNITIES HOSPITAL 32.948.87 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 133838 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO $134.93 LAB SUPPLIES 133039 COLICH AND SONS a273.2bl.60 133060 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 31.095.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-1 PUMP PARTS I33011 COMPUTER FLOORS. INC $1.639.11 CFLOORINGOMPUTER INSTALLATION 2330a2 COMPUSA. INC. a:.659.12 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 1330A3 CO 3112.95 COMPUTER SERVICES 133061 CONSOLIDATED ED ELECTRICAL GIST a12.$78.3 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 33046 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO a17. OFFICE SUPPLIE9 233046 J30A6 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC fl).903 90 fTl 133047 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO s1.b16.25 TOOLS X CHLORINE CAL 10-9-91 SERVICE = 133048 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS N C $3.7L9.17 GEOTECNNICAL SERVICES M.0.7-17-91 133056 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC $124562.30 ELECTRIC PARTS 133051 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 35fi 2.J4 TRUCK PARTS 13J051 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC a1A06.91 ELECTRIC H PARTS 133053 THL REGENTS OF THE LIZATIOla s1u3204.42 RESEARCH GRANT RAGEH.G.11-13-91 T bd 133053 STATE BOARD OF E:u ILIZ ATI0). f28f.62 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK TARES 133055 J.Y. R 71 GELD CO INC 31.260.68 PIPING SUPPLIE9 N 233055 DAPPER TIRE ,970.04 TRUCK PARTS 133057 PETER C DAVID II 32tl1.970.04 CONSTRUCTION 7-20 1J3051 DE ARIA CORPORATION $150.00 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 133058 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS 1149.13 LAB SUPPLIES 133659 OEZURIK AND/OR CS CO $2.050.12 VALVES 133060 DIALOG INFORMATION SERVICES 375.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 133061 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 31.100.UL CHEMICALS 133062 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $1,215.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES 133063 STCON CORP 4229.60 OFFICE MACHINE 133064 DODGE CONSTRUCTION NEWS 3448.00 NOTICES 8 ADS 133065 DOMAN ELECTRIC INC $2.604.93 ELECTRIC PARTS 133066 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC f950.0C PLANT MAINTENANCE 8 REPAIRS 133067 DOWER ELEVA70K COMPANY $820.06 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 133068 DRESSER MEASUREMENT $561.55 METER 133069 DUNN EDWARDS CORP 3625.59 PAINT SUPPLIES 133070 EDA (ENGINEERING DESIGN AUTO) a8.281.61 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 133671 ESP NORTH 41.522.52 SAFETY SUPPLIES 133072 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING 4176.56 HARDWARE 133073 EASTMAN INC $3,965.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 133074 EBERHARD EQUIPMENT $66.91 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/93 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COU6IY CLAIMS PAID 14/20/93 POSTING DATE 10/14/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 133075 ECOANALYSIS INC $7.196.47 OCEAN MONITORING H.0.1-13-93 133076 ED.ARDS DIV. OF GS BLDG SYS. s153.U0 REPAIR MATERIALS 133077 ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHING 4194.31 BOOKS 133078 ENCHANTER INC f5.090.Uu OCEAN MONITORING H.0.6-10-92 133079 ESSCO PUMPS AND CONTROLS 51.187.84 PUMP PARTS 133080 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC 5149.54 LAB SUPPLIES 133081 ESSENCE GROUP $2.270.36 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 133082 FST SAND AND GRAVEL INC 42a6.21 ROAD BASE 133083 MARSHALL FAIRRES 378:08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 133004 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S1V.916.84 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.10-9-91 133085 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP f611.54 AIR FREIGHT 133086 FERRELL6AS $27.24 PROPANE 133087 FISCHER b PORTER CO 52.335.27 CHLORINATION PARTS 233080 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $2.935.81 LAB SUPPLIES 133089 FISONS INSTRUMENTS 5249.9i TRAINING SUPPLIES 133090 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $550.60 LAB SUPPLIES 133091 FLO-SYSTEMS $591.77 PUMP PARTS 233092 FLUORAMICS INC 5312.06 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES rn 133093 FORCE MFG CO.. INC $43.51 OFFICE REPAIRS 1K 133094 CLIFFORD A FORKERT f6.512.60 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 2 133095 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA f126.37 FILM 133G96 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY f525.40 WATER USE 133097 FOUNTAIN VALLEY FAINT S5.208.34 PAINT SUPPLIES 133998 CITY OF FULLERTON 4291.73 WATER USE 133099 GET. INC. 41,031.20 PRINTING IW' 133100 GANAHL LUMBER CO 5925.02 LUMBER W 133111 GAR NA TT-CALLAHAN COMPANY 5161.63 CHEMICALS 133102 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE •838.12 GAUGES ' 133103 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO $13,309.02 ELECTRIC SWITCHGEAR REPAIRS 133104 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 4164.b6 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES. 133105 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $4.548.37 TELEPHONE SERVICES 133106 61ERLICH-MITCHELL INC $18,015.80 MECHANICAL PARTS 233107 N GLANTZ S SON 5165.81 PAINT SUPPLIES 233208 GOODWAY TOOLS CORP. $1.794.96 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 133109 GRASSY S.T.I. $1,077.21 METER 133110 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE $12.770.00 CONTRACTOR'S (DOA( TAR LIEN 133111 HB TYPE 6 GRAPHICS $70.06 PRINTING 133112 MARKER EQUIPMENT CO 45.764.89 MECHANICAL PARTS 133113 MAESTAO METHODS $135.66 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 133314 FRED A HARPER 51.500.G0 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 133115 HATCH 6 KIRK INC 5577.89 ENGINE PARTS 133116 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS •1.6b0.04 CONTAINER RENTALS 133117 PL HIGH CO INC 5916.99 FILTERS 233118 HEWLETT PACKARD $1,390.36 SERVICE AGREEMENT 133119 HEWLETT PACKARO COMPANY f950.91 LAB SUPPLIES 1331262G H1LTI INC f2.729.99 T0049 FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 16/13/93 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITA71ON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 16/20/93 POSTING DATE 18/20/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 133121 HOERSIGER CVS CALIF INC $121.24 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 133122 RS HUSHES CO INC 6990.72 PAINT SUPPLIES 133123 RODNEY HUNT CO 6334.57 FREIGHT 133124 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $19.75 WATER USE 133125 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA 322.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 133126 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL - $32.153.78 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 133127 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS S815.46 CONNECTORS 133226 INGRAM PAPER S424.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 133229 INTEGRATED SEPARATION SYS. 51,078.73 LAB SUPPLIES 133230 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT Se7B.74 WATER USE 133131 J.S.B. ENGINEERING $7,557.55 ENGINEERING SERVICES 133132 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP $717.81 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 133133 JAVAID CONTRACTORS INC $71.182.30 133134 JAYS CATERING $264.58 CONSTRUCTION P2-23-5-1 DIRHCTORS' PARTING EXPENSES 133135 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO $55.00 IRUCK REPAIRS PARTS 133136 JIH•S SUSPENSION SERVICE 581.65 TRUCK REPAIRS 233138 JONNS TO NE SUPPLY $1.SB1.65 HLBCTRIC BUPPLI68 133139 JOWLS CHEMICALS INC S2.4C0.74 CHEMICALS rTI 1331]9 NABS- ADVANCED MATERIALS INC 66.000.GG X RNGINE REPAIRS Z 233141 - KETEMA/RADAR S11B.Y0 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 133142 KING BEARING INC V589.90 FITTINGS [A 1l3142 KN 0% INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 51.21`v.92 TOOLS 133143 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO 6596.6] HO 1AR TELEP J 3144 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL .970.4. OCEAN L ONITORINGNE SERVICES w 133145 MARVAC ELECTRONICS S11.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1 133146 MATT - CHLOR INC 6402.66 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES r 137117 MENTRI% CARP S861.25 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 133148 MIDWAY MFG S MACHINING $9.944.13 MACHINE REPAIRS ' 133149 MISSION INDUSTRIES S2.538.74 UNIFORM RENTALS 133150 MONTGOMERY VATSON $347.37 ENGINEERING SERVICES 233151 NATIONAL RENT A FENCE CO 5115.77 FENCING RENTAL 133152 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $355.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 133153 NATIONAL SAN/TANY SUPPLY S109.65 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 133154 . HEAL SUPPLY CO S1.227.97 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 233155 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTE S119.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION M.0.7-14-93 133156 NORLAB. INC $1,137.60 LAB SUPPLIES 133157 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RLS $195.22 OFFICE FURNITURE 233156 THE OHMART CORP $512.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS 233159 OR SYSTEMS CO $31,297.75 CHLORINE M.0.11-18-92 133160 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $154.66 TRUCK PARTS 133161 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY C 91.UJ3.19 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 133162 ORANGE COURIER 1133.56 FREIGHT 133163 ORANGE VALVE A fITTIN6 CO. $1.989.79 FITTINGS 133164 ORITE% CORP - S893.64 MACHINE SUPPLIES 133165 OSCAR-S LOCK A SAFE 4103.87 KEYS/LOCKS 133166 COUNTY OF ORANGE J WAYNL AIRPO 5111.465.6V SEWER REPAIRS M.0.9-6-93 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/93 PAGE 5 REFORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 16/20/93 POSTING DATE 10/29/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 133167 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT f26.621.Otl RAINWATER WORMERS COMP INSURANCE 133169 ORANGE COUNTY WATER ISTPIC s342$112.00 GAP WATER M.O.6-9-93 133170 PGA SCIEN TIi ICE CORPORATION .090.00 LAB SUPPLIES 133171 P p L LABS alr$96.40 LAB EUPPLIE9 133172 PSSC IPOOL SUPPLY OF CC) 509.51 SEWERGROUNDSKEEPINGIN SUPPLIES 133173 PSSI f4.5U9.51 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 133174 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $13831.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 133175 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 3$14.32 SAFETY SUPPLIES 133176 PACIFIC BELL f14.32 TELEPHONE REEMENTB 233177 PADREL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 17.134.40 SERVICE ALASUPPLI 133170 PADRE JANITORIAL SUVV $6r 196.66 RENTAL EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 233179 PAGENEIRKSON 603.79 RENTAL EQUI PARTS 133190 PARTSON CORPORATION f6.G03.79 MECHANICAL PARTS 133181 PARTS UNLIMITED f.46.39 CONSTRUCTION PARTS 233181 PASCAL A LUDWIG $1 OB$460.60 CONSTRUCTION P2-43.1 113182 ROT PCND ER 6p Afl 3160.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 133183 PERM IN-ELMER CORPORATION I f1.474.99 LAB SUPPLIES AR 133185 JE Pn6ROIPS CO INC ,974.63 ELECTRIC PARTS 333185 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC i11A 974.65 X 1331B6 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARC 37U.68 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-93 _. EDWARE 133187 POLYPURE INC $169767,72 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 W 133168 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO f421.03 133189 MAROLO PRIMPOSE ICE $21.OG INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 13 3190 FR OF ESS ION AL EERY ICi IMD. 3,57.32 SOIL TESTING py 133191 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $83.73 BUILDING MATERIALS In 133192 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS 5425.61 ELECTRIC PARTS 133193 R B R INSTRUMENTS S81.57 ELECTRIC PARTS 133194 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO f1.600.21 TRASH REMOVAL 133195 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO 3169.83 LAB EQUIPMENT 133196 RED WING SHOES $977.52 SAFETY SHOES 133191 BOLT DELEVERV AND/OR 5115.25 FREIGHT 133198 THE REGISTER 3355.46 NOTICES A ADS 133199 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY 3738.82 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 133200 RESTER CORP fg9.97 133201 NTAN-NERCO $4.123.10 PUMPS 1332G2 SIG TUBE S1b3.05 E PARTS REFUND USER PRB OVERPAYMENT 133203 SANTA FE BAG CO - 4214.10 R 133204 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 31,152.84 BUILDING MATERIALS PLUMBING IUPPLIEe 133205 BARTDXIAS CORP S109.13 LAB SUPPLIES 111206 DOUG SApV15 a544.Du 133207 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP $89.973.96 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING CONSTRUCTION 5-36 133209 SEATT SPECIALTY DES1 GASES INC $q.351.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS 133209 SEA COAST ASSIGNS SS1.25 133210 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $255.46 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS WATER USE 133211 SEA TREE a700.36 133212 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $1.478.Bi LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES TOOLS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/93 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CUU14TV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANbE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/20/93 POSTING DATE 10/2G/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 133213 SHURELUCK SALES S6.5C5.70 TOOLS 133214 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO $525.78 LAS SUPPLIER 133215 SMITH PIPE t SUPPLY INC 442.70 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 133216 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP 3473.71 TOOLS 133217 SOIL MOISTURE CORP. 412..72 LAB SUPPLIES 133218 SOLAR TUR6INES INCORPORATED 9604.42 ELECTRIC PARTS 133219 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 434.39U.b9 POWER 133220 SO CAL GAS CO $3,796.33 NATURAL GAS 133221 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO 417,469.51 DIESEL/UNLRADED FUEL 133222 SOUTH SNORE WINDOW MAINT. 62.083.34 WINDOW WASHING SERVICES 233223 SOUVENIR PHOTO $136.62 PHOTO SERVICES 133224 STAMEN Z SPASSOFF PE $1,600.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 133225 WESTALLOY INC f1.234.85 WELDING SUPPLIES 133226 SPEK INDUSTRIES INC 5311.94 LAB SUPPLIES 133227 STERLING ART 193.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 133226 GARY 6 STREED $4.259.Wb BEING PETTY CASH, TRAVEL t TRAINING 133229 STROMBERG PRODUCTS $24.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 133230 SUMMIT STEEL $393.29 METAL m 133231 SUNSET FORD Sk.3.1U TRUCK PARTS X 133232 SUPELCO INC $422.70 LAB SUPPLIES 2 133233 TEKTRONIX INC 5660.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 133234 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 42.O67.44 133235 THORPE INSULATION $60.61 MECHANICAL SUPPLIER BUILDING MATERIALS 133237 3N TELC OLO PRODUCTS U1V 570.79 INSTRUMENT PARTS 133238 TONY-S LOCK t GAF[ SERVICE 539.30 KEYS W 133270 T0.RN5 MAilON INC f539.]0 PUMP ' T 133239 TRINITY CONSULTANTS INC s650.00 TAAININO REGISTRATION M.0.7-14-93 131240 TKUCK t RUT SUPPLY INC S6B2.10 TRUCK PARTS 133241 TRUESDAIL LABS $115.00 LAB SERVICES 133242 JG TUCKER b SON INC $703.98 INSTRUMENT PARTS 133243 TUSTIN D006E $66.93 TRUCK PARTS 133244 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 6171.6C LAB SERVICES 133245 US AUTO GLASS CENTERS S387.45 TRUCK PARTS 133246 U.S.C. SPONSORED PROJECTS ACCT $36,593.34 TECHNICAL SERVICES 133247 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC 5342.Y6 LAB SUPPLIES 133248 UNOCAL 426.73 UNLEADED GASOLINE 133249 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 9296.26 PARCEL SERVICES 133250 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $318.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIED 133251 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 44.855.26 LAB SUPPLIES 133252 VIRTUAL RESLARCH CORP. 51.300.OG COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT SERVICES 133253 WATER CNVIRONMENT FED. f150.4G PUBLICATION 233254 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT 5568.26 SAFETY SUPPLIES 133255 WEBER NAME PLATE 1169.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 133256 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY f20.946.43 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 133257 ROURKE t WOODRUFF t SPRADLIA 519.131.25 LEGAL SERVICED M.O.2-19-92 133250 AEROK CORP S14.855.59 COPIER LEASES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/93 PAGE 7 REFORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/20/93 POSTING DATE 10/20/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 133259 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $794.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS 133260 2YKARK CORP. $21.550.66 LAB EQUIPMENT 133261 RICHARD 8 EDGAR 4200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/20/93 S2r401.100.64 SUMMARY AMOUNT t2 OPER FUND 3,586.41 03 OPER FUND 17,341.72 t3 CAP PAC FUND 8,250.00 85 OPEN FUND 1,787.71 65 CAP PAC FUND 90,833.96 46 OPEN FUND 41.97 m 07 OPEN FUND 2,360.26 X 97 CAP PAC FUND 485,111.45 Z III OPER FUND 7,493.86 t11 CAP FAC FUND 88.63 W 114 OPEN FUND 24.91 t14 CAP FAC FUND 17,116.86 /566 OPER FUND 1,121.92 CO t566 CAP FAC FUND 195,071.24 1 3T OPER FUND 817,406.13 V CORF 552,793.20 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FU 26,621.08 3T DIST WORKING CAPITAL 174,048.73 ___________________ 2,401,100.04 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby "certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting l on ��,�/µyyr�, /,d , 19n was duly posted for public inspection pu at the main lobby of the Districts offices on _ v 7 1913. IN �WIIT.,�NE..SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of Penny Kyle s stant Secretary o each of the Bc ds of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 , 7 , 11, 13 6 14 of Orange County, California F27A.1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS At ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RE: AGENDA ITEM NO . 11 10844 ELLIS AVENUE R0.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 927209127 QW9112.2411 October 27, 1993 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: October 27. 1993 - 5:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Director Ted R. Moreno Charles E. Puckett Vice Joint Chairman Director Leslie A. Pontious A. B. "Buck" Catlin Past Joint Chairman Director James V. Evans Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, John Collins Chairman, District 2 General Counsel Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 John Cox, Jr. Chairman, District 5 STAFF PRESENT: James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Barry Hammond Chairman, District 7 J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Gary Streed, Director of Finance John M. Gullixon Chairman, District 13 Blake Anderson, Director of Roger Stanton County Supervisor Technical Services William Steiner County Supervisor Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of ABSENT Operations Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Robert Richardson Chairman, District 1 Maintenance Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Ed Torres, Air Quality Manager 1) Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on October 20, and considered several items of business. Enclosed is a report (green) of the Committee's meeting. The recommended action is as follows: Report of the Executive Committee , October 27, 1993 A) Taxable Commercial Paoer Program. The Fiscal Policy Committee has considered the benefits of a taxable commercial paper program (TCPP) which will eliminate the need for the Districts to draw down reserves during the so-called dry period (June- November) each year when property tax and user fee revenue cash flows are insufficient to meet the Districts' operating expenses. The program would allow the Districts to leave the funds in reserve at their current high interest earnings, and enter into a short-term borrowing arrangement at a lower interest rate to provide the funds to meet dry period operating cash flow requirements. Based on current market conditions the Districts would net about $5 million dollars annually from such a program. A TCPP produces interest earnings to investors that are taxable, but has no tax consequences to the Districts. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends approval of the TCPP. Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee and recommends the following actions to implement a taxable commercial paper program: 1 . Direct staff and consulting financing team members to proceed with implementation of a $50 million taxable commercial paper program (TCPP). 2. Approve letter/memo agreements with Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe to serve as Special Counsel for the taxable commercial paper program for a fee not to exceed $30,000; and with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin to provide Co-Counsel services at a fee not to exceed $5,000. 3. Authorize staff to secure the services of the rating agencies, Moody's and Standard & Poor's, in a total amount not to exceed $75,000: 1) to determine whether the Districts can proceed with a TCPP using their own liquidity or.whether obtaining a line of credit is necessary; and 2) to obtain a short- term credit rating. 2 Report of the Executive Committee October 27, 1993 4. Approve letter agreement with Lehman Brothers to provide banking services for the TCPP for a 5.0 basis point commission which is to be included in the all-in interest cost of the TCPP (estimated to be $25,000 annually based on a $50 million program). 2) Air Quality Management Implementation Plan. Utilizing the enclosed presentation outline (ivory) the staff reviewed their separate report recommending that the Boards authorize development of an Air Quality Management Implementation Plan as a supplement to the Districts' 30-year "2020" VISION Wastewater Management Action Plan. The plan would be prepared in two phases. The estimated in-house cost of $15O,000 is summarized as follows: Air Quality Management Imolementation Plan In-House Budget Descriotion Phase I Phase II Total Amount Staff Costs $85,000 $61,000 $146,000 Districts' Vehicle and Equipment Charges 2000. 2,000 4,000 TOTAL 587.000 $63,000 5150.000 Upon completion of Phase I, a report will be submitted to the Directors describing the results and the recommendations for conducting Phase II. It is anticipated that outside consulting services will be required to complete the Phase II work. The Executive Committee decided that the consulting services should be considered by the Boards at that time along with the Phase I report and any project budget amendments deemed appropriate. Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee recommends the following action: Authorize preparation of the Air Quality Management Implementation Plan in the estimated amount of $150,000 for the in-house costs for Phase I and II of said plan; and authorize and direct staff to proceed with Phase I of said Plan. 3 Report of the Executive Committee October 27, 1993 3) Modifications to Biofiltration Demonstration Project. Utilizing the enclosed presentation outline (yellow) the staff reviewed their separate report (gray) on the status of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project and proposed modifications to the project. The Directors have previously authorized a biofiltration demonstration project to study the performance of biofilters for treating toxic, volatile organic and odorous compounds from the off-gasses of the Districts' treatment processes. The project is being conducted in cooperation with the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the Water Environment Research Foundation, and the Southern California Edison Company, who are all sharing in the cost. As the research work has progressed, additional work has been identified as being needed, mostly for more intensive laboratory analysis recommended by a panel of experts and the discovery of additional target compounds that must be analyzed. Staff is therefore requesting that the Boards' authorization to conduct the biofiltration demonstration project be amended. Executive Committee Recommendation. The Executive Committee recommends amending the Boards' actions of November 18, 1992 and April 14, 1993, authorizing staff to conduct the Blofiltration Demonstration Project, as follows: A) Modify the authorization to conductthe Biofiltration Demonstration Project to reflect revised estimated project costs and funding as follows: Demonstration Project Budget Original Previous Existing Proposal Proposed Budaet Item Authorization Revisions Authorization Revisions Authorization Staffing $ 62,000 $ 45,000 $107,000 $ 21,000 $128,000 Equipment 25,000 (10,000) 15,000 15,000 Supplies 14,000 (5,000) 9,000 8,000 17,000 Travel 5,000 5,000 51000 Contracts 174,000 (30.000) 144,000 71,000 215,000 TOTALS 5280.000 i____2 284 0.000 $100,000 $380,000 4 Report of the Executive Committee October 27, 1993 Demonstration Proiect Fundino Proposed Proposed Source Existing Revision Fundino SCAOMD $125,000 $126,000 WERF 30,000 30,000 SCE 50,000 50,000 SUBTOTAL OUTSIDE $205,000 $205,000 FUNDING CSDOC 75,000 100,000 175,000 TOTAL $280.000 5100 000 5380 0 B) Authorize the staff to procure the needed additional contract analytical laboratory services to conduct necessary testing pertaining to the Biofiltration Demonstration Projects, in accordance with established procurement policies. C) Authorize the General Manager to execute an extension to the specific- term-employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services, for an additional three-and-one-half months, for a revised total of fifteen-and-one-half months, increasing the authorized maximum from $45,000 to $58,000. JW ISI :euuyreegg Epndro`'O.S. 42793.9cm 5 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION s• """ DEMONSTRATION PROJECT11 ' p GE coo y GE COOK` Overview • November 1992 authorization to conduct Biofiltration Demonstration Project for $280,000. • April 1993 authorization of specific-term employment agreement to support project. • Authorized contracts with co-funding agencies : SCAQMD - $1259000 WERF - 30,000 SCE - 50,000 Total -Co-funding $205,000 Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 1 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION gn„ *hT'Gh 4i "eyelet. O ♦OI.j9 DEMONSTRATION PROJECT 'r O ; O i.e.19S91, g NGE coo Biofiltration : Technology & Benefits • Gas treatment technology that uses microorganisms. • Ability to remove odorous compounds, VOCs and air toxics. • No cross-media impacts. • Low operating costs. • Improved safety. Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 2 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Oq +o..iss Sy NOE COU~ Scope of Research : Five Tasks 1 . Review literature on Biofiltration . 2. Develop an experimental protocol. 3 . Test bench-scale biofilters. 4. Test pilot-scale biofilters. 5. Conceptually design a full-scale biofilter. Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 3 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION Jr4 O Jeoellwn Oia OJ@J4 DEMONSTRATION PROJECT fq Oq Sys.1959 ,"GE COO Status of Project • Contracts signed in June 1993 with co-funding agencies and USC. • Completed Literature Review Report in August 1993. • Completed Experimental Protocol in September 1993. • Constructed and began testing of bench-scale reactors. v 11 reactors 4 different media 1st of 3 experimental runs Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 4 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION "Not i ,.e°I an O °I1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECT U ,�!! f4 .B5 °p4&GE L°UN� Future Activities • Two additional bench-scale experimental runs planned. • Design and construct pilot-scale biofilters. • Prepare conceptual design of full-scale biofilters. Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 5 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT U g, °4NGE COON Recommendation for Additional Funding • Additional $100,000 is needed to support project. • Funds needed for: 1 . Analytical Services $ 71 ,000 2. Temporary In-house Staffing Services 21 ,000 3. Supplies & Materials 8,000 Proposed Additional Funding $100,000 Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 6 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT pc.199 ° MOE COUN� Reasons for Additional Funding Analytical Services : • Technical Advisory Committee comments on Experimental Protocol recommend additional testing. • SCAQMD mandated testing identified new compounds of concern. • New microbiological test methods became apparent. Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 7 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION 50 ATI 44 o DEMONSTRATION PROJECT q pMGE WO Reasons for Additional Funding - continued In-house Staffing : • Delay in contract start date. • Start-up period for internal Laboratory services. Supplies & Materials : • Unforeseen needs for conducting testing. Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 8 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION 5 1TTIp^p 11 p.vela• ovo@r DEMONSTRATION PROJECT p p,NGf 60U Proposed Demonstration Project Funding Existing Revision Proposed SCAQMD $125,000 $1259000 WERF 30,000 309000 SCE 50,000 50,000 Subtotal Outside $205,000 $205,000 $205,000 Funding CSDOC 75,000 100,000 175,000 TOTAL $280,000 $175,000 $380,000 Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 9 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION 1; ..ov.ca^ oe S19 DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ' V G 'fug.195 ,NGE COO Recommendations • Modify the authorization to conduct the Biofiltration Demonstration Project to a revised budget of $3807000. • Authorize staff to procure additional contracted analytical services in accordance with established procurement policies. • Authorize General Manager to extend specific-term employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for an additional 3 1 /2 months for a Not-to-Exceed funding of $58;000. Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 10 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Al ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA October 20, 1993 +OBAA Elul AVENUE 0o Bo.e+27 FOUWA N VALLEY,CALIFORNIA E27n-6I27 PIA196bB411 REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE Meeting Date: October 20. 1993 - 5:30 P.M. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Peer Swan, Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Don Griffin Steve Sardegna, KPMG John Gullixson Peggy McBride, KPMG Evelyn Hart Iry Pickler STAFF PRESENT: Charles E. Puckett James Wahner J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Grace Winchell Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering ABSENT Blake Anderson, Director of Technical Services James V. Evans Robert J. Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance Dan Dillon, Accounting Manager Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager 1 . TAXABLE COMMERCIAL PAPER PROGRAM. The Committee reviewed a staff report (enclosed presentation book) and considered the benefits of a taxable commercial paper program (TCPP)• The commercial paper market is one of the oldest and most widely employed methods of short-term borrowing. As of September 30, 1993, a total of $547 billion of commercial paper was outstanding worldwide. Commercial paper programs are gaining popularity with sophisticated private sector and governmental issuers with large capital requirements, both on a taxable and tax-exempt basis. A taxable commercial paper program (TCPP) which eliminates the need for the Districts to draw funds from reserves during the so-called dry period when property tax and user fee revenue cash flows are Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 2 p October 20, 1993 insufficient to meet the Districts' operating expenses would be financially beneficial to the Districts. A taxable commercial paper program produces interest earnings to investors that are taxable, but has no tax consequences to the Districts. The proposed TCPP is extremely flexible, can be terminated with relative ease, is inexpensive to establish, easily administered and could produce a net program earnings of more than $5 million annually. The TCPP would function as a working capital funding source. It would permit the Districts to avoid drawing from their reserves currently earning 7.87% interest in the County Commingled Pool. All unexpended commercial paper funds could also be invested in the County Commingled Pool. Interest paid by the Districts to TCPP holders is at a very low short-term rate; currently below 3.50%. The commercial paper market is dominated by three investment banking firms: Goldman Sachs , Merrill Lynch and Lehman Brothers. Staff requested written proposals from these three firms for a potential $50 million TCPP. Staff has reviewed the proposed fee structure and qualifications of the three firms and has recommended the selection of Lehman Brothers, if the Directors decide to implement the TCPP Committee Recommendation In order to implement a taxable commercial paper program, the Committee recommends the following actions: A. Direct staff to proceed with implementation of a $50 million taxable commercial paper program (TCPP). B. Approve letter agreements with Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe (salmon) to serve as Special Counsel to the taxable commercial paper program for a fee not to exceed $30,000; and with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin (goldenrod) to provide General Counsel services at a fee not to exceed $5,000. C. Authorize staff to secure the services of the rating agencies, Moody's and Standard & Poor's, in a total amount not to exceed $75,000: 1 ) to determine whether the Districts can proceed with a TCPP using our own liquidity or whether obtaining a line of credit is necessary; and 2) to obtain a short-term credit rating. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 3 October 20, 1993 D. Approve letter agreement with Lehman Brothers (pink) to provide banking services for the TCPP for a 5.0 basis point commission which is to be included in the all-in interest cost of the TCPP (estimated to be $25,000 annually based on a $50 million program). 2. 1993 INTEREST RATE SWAP PROGRAM STRATEGY. At its September 1993 meeting, the Committee recommended that the Districts should postpone proceeding with a fixed receivor interest rate SWAP in view of declining longer-term interest rates. Given historically low fixed receivor rates and narrow spread, the Committee recommended that the transaction be delayed until more favorable market conditions return, and that Board authorization be sought to allow the financing team to move quickly to consummate the transaction if and when market conditions became more favorable. The Executive Committee and the Boards of Directors approved the Fiscal Policy Committee recommendations and adopted profit thresholds of $1 million for one year of $1 .5 million for two years to trigger the transaction. Staff reported that it has continued to monitor fixed receivor rates and the value of an up-front one or two year reversal. Since the last meeting, longer-term rates have elevated somewhat bringing SWAP rates closer to our targets. As of October 11 , 1993, the seven-year fixed receivor rate is 3.56%, while the PSA weekly index is 2.56%, providing an up-front reversal amount of $930,994 for one year and $1 ,401 ,235 for two years. Therefore, the current market does not yet produce the Board-approved minimum threshold savings. This was an informational status report only and no Committee action was required. 3. POTENTIAL OWNER CONTROLLED WRAP-UP INSURANCE PROGRAM. At the April 1993 Committee meeting, Districts' staff and insurance broker, Robert F. Driver Associates, presented a new insurance program concept for consideration by the Directors. The concept, referred to as an Owner-Controlled Wrap-up Insurance Program, is a centralized and coordinated insurance and loss prevention program that provides coverages for job site construction and contractor risk for all participating parties. Wrap-up insurance coverages include workers' Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 4 D October 20, 1993 compensation, general liability, excess liability, excess automobile and project errors and omissions. Staff advised that implementation of such a program by the Districts would require specific approval by the State Legislature. Pursuant to the Boards' authority, staff and General Counsel sought to obtain legislative approval for an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Program. Michael F. Dillon & Associates was also retained to assist the Districts. Staff reported that Mr. Dillon was successful in organizing the lobbying efforts of other agencies also desiring legislative authority to begin a wrap-up program. On September 26, 1993, the Governor signed SB 286 which grants wrap-up insurance authority for specific purposes, including "any water, wastewater, or reclamation project undertaken by a public agency serving a population exceeding 250,000 . . ." This legislation, chaptered as 93-0504, will allow the Districts to proceed with a wrap-up insurance program when and if it is deemed appropriate. Staff further reported that now that legislative authority exists, Districts' staff and Robert F. Driver are completing a detailed program evaluation for possible consideration in the near future. This was an informational status report only and no Committee action was required. 4. COMMENDATION FOR PATTI GORCZYCA. FINANCIAL MANAGER. At the October Joint Board meeting, the General Manager reported that Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager, had accepted a position in the private sector and would be leaving the Districts at the end of the month. The Committee acknowledged the contributions of Ms. Gorczyca for the past three years. Ms. Gorczyca has been instrumental in shaping and implementing the Five-Year Financial Plan, including the Capital Improvement Program 1990-92 Certificates of Participation Series A, B and C; two advance refunding issues; three interest rate SWAP agreements; and a reverse repurchase agreement program. During these three years, the Districts have borrowed over $316 million and realized interest earnings rather than interest cost. During this period, Ms. Gorczyca was also responsible for upgrading the Districts' risk management and insurance programs. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee �q Page 5 October 20, 1993 As a token of their appreciation for all of these and other efforts and contributions, the Committee directed that a letter of commendation be issued to Ms. Gorczyca. 5. ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER'S ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT. The Orange County Treasurer provides banking and investment services for the Districts in accordance with our adopted investment policy. The Committee reviewed the County Treasurer's recently issued annual Financial Statement of the County Treasury for 1992-93 (tan) which is enclosed. During 1992-93, gross interest earnings at the County for all of the Districts totaled $24,259,492.09, or 8.52%. The Orange County Treasurer was paid .06% for their services, reducing the net yield to 8.46%. The separate specific reverse repurchase agreement program earnings are not included in these totals as the first interest receipt for this program will not be until October 28, 1993. This is an informational item only and no action is required. 6. ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT AND MANAGEMENT LETTER FOR YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1993. Staff reviewed the draft Audit Report for the year ended June 30, 1993, and noted that once again the auditor's opinion expressed no material defects in procedures or control. Letters to the Boards, reporting compliance with all COP issue covenants and petty cash policies, are included with the Annual Audit report. Peggy McBride, the Audit Partner from KPMG Peat Marwick, reviewed the conduct of the audit and the results. She reported that this year's audit was the smoothest in her experience with the Districts, that no significant audit adjustments were proposed and that the 1992-93 Audit Report and Financial Reports were consistent with the prior year. Steve Sardegna, Audit Manager, discussed the Management Letter and staff's response. He noted that these were not major concerns, but were areas of recommended policy and procedural changes that the Directors should be aware of. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 6 U October 20, 1993 The Audit Report will be mailed by KPMG Peat Marwick directly to the Board members for consideration at the November regular meeting. 7. "TEETER PLAN" PROPERTY TAX ALLOCATION METHOD. At the September Fiscal Policy Committee meeting, Chairman Swan asked staff to prepare a report for the October meeting on the "Teeter Plan." The "Teeter Plan" is an alternative method of property tax allocation used in five counties and recently approved for use in Orange County for 1993-94. Counties operating under the Teeter Plan allocate property taxes to jurisdictions based upon the total amount of property taxes levied, rather than the amount collected. The entire 1993-94 secured tax levy will be allocated in nine installments without regard for delinquencies. The same allocation method and schedule will apply to user fees collected on the tax bill. The Committee reviewed the enclosed staff report (gold) which summarizes the advantages and the financial impact of the Teeter Plan method of property tax allocations. The County Auditor-Controller has advised staff that because the Districts use the County Treasurer as a tax depository, we have automatically been included in the Teeter Plan allocation method which was approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 29, 1993. No further action is required by the Directors. S. PETTY CASH POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. The petty cash policy was last reviewed by Boards in 1991 , resulting in the current policy as set forth in Resolution No. 91-146, adopted by the Boards in August 1991 . The Petty Cash Fund receives a separate annual audit and a special report from KPMG, the Districts' independent auditors. In September, at the request of Director Hart, the Committee reviewed the Districts' petty cash policies and procedures. The Committee requested additional information from staff for review at the October meeting. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 7 October 20, 1993 At the October meeting, the Committee reviewed summary expense reports for July and August. These reports indicated that a majority of the expenses are reimbursements for training, travel and meetings for staff and Directors. After considerable discussion regarding budgeting, payment and reporting alternatives, a more detailed presentation was requested for consideration at the next Committee meeting. 9. TRAVEL, MEETING AND TRAINING EXPENSE REVIEW. In July, the Boards reaffirmed the Districts' travel, meeting and training expense policy and asked staff to prepare a quarterly report of expenses for the Fiscal Policy Committee's review. The Committee was unable to review the staff report because of time constraints and the matter was continued to the next meeting. 10. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN DAILY EFFORT (PRIDE). The Committee reviewed several PRIDE suggestions that staff had submitted for consideration and evaluation. Certificates and cash awards totaling $2,195, in accordance with the Board-approved PRIDE program, and as summarized in the enclosed staff report (lavender), were approved. These six PRIDE proposals are estimated to save the Districts approximately $20,958.83 annually. JWS:Ic REF:J:\NP000\FRO.MTG\RFM 10.93 Enclosures a A, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Presentation to: Fiscal Policy Committee Taxable Commercial Paper Program October 20, 1993 � Q Table of Contents • Policy Decision: Should the Districts Establish a Taxable Commercial Paper Program (TCPP) • Summary of TCPP • Why A Taxable CPP • Potential Current Market Earnings of TCPP • TCPP Example • Advantages of a TCPP • Disadvantages of a TCPP • Implementation Requirements of a TCPP County Sanitation Districts of Orange County e POLICY DECISION SHOULD THE DISTRICTS ESTABLISH A TAXABLE COMMERCIAL PAPER PROGRAM (TCPP)? County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page t • f Summary of Taxable Commercial Paper Program EXISTING SITUATION • The County Auditor/Controller apportions to the Districts property tax and user fee revenues in accordance with a schedule of distributions commencing November 29 through July 18 each year. During certain months, the Districts operating requirements exceed available revenues. • The Districts reserves structure presently includes a $49,232,000 Dry Period Funding Reserve which serves to fund the Districts on-going operating requirements when property tax and user fees are not available. • When the Districts draw from the Dry Period reserve, it loses high County Commingled Pool interest earnings. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 2 • G Summary of Taxable Commercial Paper Program (con't.) Taxable Commercial Paper Program • A TCPP permits the Districts to draw from funds borrowed at low short term taxable interest rates. • The TCPP produces two forms of interest earnings 1. Increased interest earnings on reserves 2. Net interest earnings on TCPP County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 3 6 Potential Current Market Earnings of TCPP Interest Earnings/(Payments) $50 TCPP Interest Cost ($197509000) (1) Unspent TCPP Interest Earnings 3,514,837 (2) Net TCPP Earnings UJ641837 $50 Million Reserves Interest Earning 3,750,000 (3) Net Combined Reserves & TCPP Interest Earnings $5,514,837 (1) Assumes an average rate of3.50% (2) Includes Property Tax and User Fee revenues as allocated to Districts by the County (3) Assumes an average County Commingled Pool rate of 7.50% County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 4 Why a Taxable Commercial Paper Program • The Districts are prohibited from borrowing on a tax-exempt basis for cash for operating purposes unless a deficit occurs. • The Districts cannot represent that revenue shortfalls due to property tax and user fee apportionments are deficits because we possess available cash reserves. • A TCPP permits the Districts to borrow for working capital purposes, free of most legal restrictions. • Due to the County's currently high earnings on funds invested in the Commingled Pool, the Districts can gain significant net earnings with a commercial paper program, even on a taxable basis. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 5 Districts' Existing and Proposed Cashflow Situation EXISTING SITUATION CSDOC Expenses & Property Taxes Districts' Outlays & User Fees Reserves & Revenues PROPOSED TCPP CSDOC Expenses & Property Taxes TCPP Outlays & User Fees Proceeds TCPP Proceeds & Districts Reserves 01000 Interest Earnings County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 6 Districts' Existing and Proposed Cashflow Situation EXISTING SITUATION ($ 000,000) 70 60 ............................ ................ so ......................................................-..,.............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 40 - - -----..................I............................I........... .... ................................................................................... 30 ................................................. !i.............. ................. 20 L2 .... . ...... .... ... . .. ... 10 L � 0 . July August September October November December January February March April May June F-—M,,tbly Revenues =Monthly Expenditures PROPOSED TCPP ($ 000,000) 70 60 .. ........ ....... ... ................ ...... so .........................I.............. ................................................................. 40 ....................................................................... .............. ................. .......... ....................................................... 30 .......... ...................... ................ 20 . -.................................................... .. ................................. ...- VI 4,w,&=w%X1Ak E.:1.,nW.We%a Vs E W�, ZMEMOUNUMM WWWRIM.6b 0 July August September October November December January February March April May June Commercial Pnper Program Balance M Monthly Expenditures County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 7 Advantages of a TCPP • Districts reserves remain unspent which maximizes interest earnings. • Districts reserves allow the County of Orange to extend investment maturities improving County Commingled Pool earnings. • A TCPP is easily implemented at very little cost. • Since TCPP funds will be invested in the County Commingled Pool, the Districts normal payable processes should not be impacted. • A TCPP is simple to administer. • A TCPP is accomplished by establishing a maximum authorized allocation and its duration is entirely determined by the Districts. • A TCPP can be terminated rather easily with little notice. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 8 Disadvantages of a TCPP • If short term interest rates exceed County Commingled Pool interest rate, a negative cashflow would result if the Commercial Paper Program were continued and short term rates remained high. Currently, the County Commingled Pool earnings are significantly higher than taxable commercial paper rates. It therefore remains unlikely that short term rates will rise above the long-term rates reflected in the County Commingled Pool. Staff will continue to monitor these rates and report back to the Fiscal Policy Committee on a monthly basis. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County_ _ _ Page 9 Implementation Requirements on a TCPP • Adoption of a Board Resolution authorizing a $50 million TCPP • Bond Counsel fees for documents preparation estimated at $30,000 • General Counsel fees for review of documents estimated at $5,000 • Annual 5 basis point commission to Investment Banking firm (commission is included in the All-In TCPP rate) • Annual Issuing and Paying Agent fee estimated not-to-exceed $10,000 annually • KPMG fees for Independent Audit services associated with the program should not exceed $10,000 • Rating Agency fees to both Moody's and Standard & Poor's estimated to total $75,000 • Possible liquidity fee at approximately 15 basis points or $75,000 (need for liquidity to be determined based on discussions with Rating Agencies) County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Page 10 QRRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE (213) 612-2421 October 14, 1993 Ms. Patricia Gorczyca Finance Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Dear Patti: We are greatly pleased and honored that the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California (the "Districts") have selected our law firm to serve as special counsel in connection with its proposed taxable commercial paper program. This letter serves to confirm our fee arrangement with respect to the financing. The amount of our fees for the services rendered by us in connection with this transaction will be $30,000 plus expenses such as long distance telephone charges, reproduction of documents, word processing, bound volumes and secretarial overtime necessary or requested because of the time demands of the transaction. We appreciate the opportunity to serve you and look forward to working with you on this matter. Sincglrely, Corm D. Sobel zko LDS/dmh 59106.1 ]>]SomA Fguemc5ne<e • l.osAogeln.Glifomla 9091) Tlgp ne 2136292OW • F mile 1n6132499 San Frn o 415 392 II22 • New Ymh 312 326 MW . 5aemm nw 916 W 9= LEHMAN BROTHERS October 12, 1993 Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca Financial Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Dear Patti: Lehman Brothers is pleased to present this engagement letter to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County for structuring and dealer services related to the Districts'potential taxable commercial paper program. In performance of these services Lehman Brothers proposes the following fee structure: Upfront Fees Structuring Fee 0 Underwriting Discount 0 Annual Fees Dealer Fee 5 basis points(.05%)of the average amount outstanding Lehman Brothers' dealer fee will be calculated daily on the outstanding amount of the taxable commercial paper program and billed quarterly in arrears on the first of January,April,July and October. Our fee is based on the assumption that Bond Counsel will prepare a purchase contract, offering documents for a program supported by a line of credit and blue sky documents as necessary. EENMAN BRo EM we M>f MAGKT MWMT BUTE113D Nl RTBWCH. "W Ms. Patricia M. Oorczyca October 12, 1993 Financial Manager Page 2 Orange County Sanitation Districts We look forward to working with the Districts and staff as dealer for your taxable commercial paper program. We are very pleased to serve the District in this capacity. Sincerely, y� R. Thornton Lurie Sara C. Walker Managing Director Vice President ' ROBERT L. "BOB" CITRON COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR ADMINISTRATION FINANCE BUILDING < tNTY O F= RM. 299. 630 N. BROApWAY P.O. BOX 4919 T I SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92792 5 1]u1834391't RANG E OFFICE OF THE TREASURER—TAX COLLECTOR tOctober 4, 1993 Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester General Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Mr. Sylvester: As the Treasurer for the Orange County Sanitation Districts, the following is my fiscal year-end report for the interest earned for the Districts. The attached Financial Statement of the County Treasury is to be made a part of the overall statement to the Sanitation Districts. Would you kindly place this report on the next applicable agenda of the governing Board of the Orange County Sanitation Districts. In the fiscal year 1992-93, we earned for the Districts total interest earnings of $24,259,492.09. The gross yield on the Districts' earnings was 8.52%. The net yield was 8.46%. Therefore, it cost the Districts .06% or approximately $14,556 to manage your funds. We believe this charge is very small in comparison to the quality of service we provide the Districts. Other California county treasurers charge . 10% to .20%. The above interest figures do not include the special $50 million investment we made for your Districts beginning April 28, 1993. These interest figures are on a cash basis, or interest actually received in the 1992-93 fiscal year. The first interest/cash receipt on this investment will be received October 28, 1993. We earned the Districts $3,530, 052 more than the 1991-92 fiscal year. We believe that this is a reflection of your having higher daily balances in the Treasury. Although the average gross yield in 1991-92 was 8.824% compared to this year's 8.52%, we believe, as the attached Annual Financial Statement indicates, that this year is by far the highest yields in the country for such a large fund coupled with a short average maturity. We have been managing your Districts' funds for many, many years. We do not take this trust for granted. We value our relationship. Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester Page 2 October 4 , 1993 We look forward to continue the professional management of your financial resources, as we have in the past. Sincerely, 1 Robert L. citron County Treasurer-Tax Collector RLC:jg Enc. HCbll L.'B06 Uange Caumy Treawrar T.�Ta.LdIBLId Same nnz Ca�nornw, 1 ROBERT L. "BOB" CITRON COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOI ADMINISTRATION .•!' FINANCE BUILDING < - NTY O F RM. 209, 630 N. BROAOWAY P.O. BOX 30 2 1 - SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 4714) 834.2911 s 3 RANGE OFFICE OF THE TREASURER—TAX COLLECTOR September 10, 1993 Board of Supervisors 10 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701 SUBJECT: Annual 1992-93 Financial Statement The Orange County Treasury manages money for 187 different and separate governmental agencies. Seventeen percent of the total monies that we manage is controlled directly by the Board of Supervisors (County General Fund, Environmental Management Agency and the John Wayne Airport, etc. ) . The remaining 83$ that we manage is for governmental agencies that are not under the control of the Board of Supervisors. Of the remaining agencies, 44 are invested in our Local Agency Investment Pool. These are agencies that have their own treasurers and are not required by law to invest with the County Treasurer. Six of the agencies are situated in other counties. Therefore, this financial report is intended for all governmental agencies for which the County Treasury manages their funds. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT: The Orange County Treasury has had an unusually high earnings rate in the face of very low investment earning interest rates. We have earned yields that we believe are the largest in the country for a very large size portfolio with a short average maturity of only two years, three months. There may be large portfolios that have higher yields because they are invested in the high end of the yield curve of more than five years average maturity, such as retirement portfolios. We earned an average yield for the fiscal year of 6.52% based upon an average monthly balance of $4. 696 Billion, a $1. 425 Billion increase average over the previous fiscal year. (We reached an outstanding balance of $5 Billion for the first time in December. The balance averaged $5.423 Billion for April, May and June 1993. ) The State of California Treasury, with an average monthly balance of $22.950 Billion had an average yield of $4 .71%. This is a minus difference to the Orange County yield of $3 .81%. (See attached graph. ) The following is a comparison of yields and average monthly balances of other California treasurers: City of Anaheim, 7.69%, $350 Million (Anaheim has over $100 Million invested with the Orange County Treasurer) . County of Los Angeles, 3 .88%, $8 Billion; San Bernardino County, 6.25%, $1.5 Billion; San Diego County, 7.30%, $3 Billion; Sonoma County, 6. 77%, $625 Million. Board of Supervisors Page 2 September 10, 1993 The total interest earnings received and paid out from investments was an all time high of $364,147,000. This was a 30.6% increase of $86,382, 000 over interest earnings for 1991-92. The total interest earnings are prorated amongst our various governmental clients based upon the average daily balances that they have on deposit in the Treasury. Our investors also only pay an average of 6/100% (6 basis points) as a cost of managing their funds. This further increases their net yield in comparison to other county treasuries who charge an average of 10 to 20 basis points. The actual net amounts of receipts that we received was $7, 782,707,000. This is accounted for as follows: AMOUNT 3 OF TOTAL TAX COLLECTIONS $2, 115, 133, 000 27. 17% SHORT TERM LOANS 242,535, 000 3.16% BONDS (NOTES) 171,305, 000 2.20% STATE SUBVENTIONS 1,944,710, 000 24 .98% INTEREST RECEIVED 364, 147, 000 4 .67% OTHER (Court Fines/Fees, _2, 944 ,877 , 000 37. 8 Recorder Fees, Licenses & Permits, etc. ) TOTAL $7,782,707,000 100. 00% The total receipts (cash flow) from all sources including the rollover or reinvestment of investments was $230.224 Billion, an increase of $58.1 Billion over the previous fiscal year. INVESTMENT POLICY: Our consistently high interest yields are realized from doing Reverse Repurchase Agreements. This is a strategy that utilizes leverage, and also involved in this strategy is the use of structured or floating interest rate securities. The use of floating rate and other securities in the past has enabled us an approximate leverage figure of 2 to 1. This strategy has been predicated on interest earning rates to continue to remain low for a minimum of the next three years. For example, instead of buying securities that are either a fixed rate or that are indexed to increase as interest rates rise, these securities, sometimes called "inverse floaters" are indexed to produce a higher yield when interest rates remain steady or decline. An example of an "inverse floater" is a U.S. government security that pays interest at a rate of 10% minus 6 month LIBOR. (LIBOR, currently at 3 .31%, is a commonly used benchmark for indexing securities. ) That security would earn a current rate of 6. 69% (10% - 3.31%) . If interest rates declined 1/2 percent, LIBOR would drop from its current rate of 3. 31% to 2.81%, and our investment - yield would increase from 6. 69% to 7 . 19% (10% - 2.81%) . The reasons for the future projection of low interest rates can be found in the section titled "THE FUTURE. " If rates were to rise materially, it is reasonable to expect that the overall performance of the portfolio would decline. Although we strongly believe that future interest rates will remain low, to insure against the eventuality of materially rising interest rates, for the last six months we have not been buying structured/floating interest rate instruments but R L-B Came 0n Caary T.J.COaevor 5"na Ma.Gmam" Hoard of Supervisors Page 3 September 10, 1993 ' have been purchasing fixed interest rate coupon instruments. This adjustment in investment policy lessens our leverage ratio and diversifies our interest rate risk. It has always been our investment policy to hold the securities we buy to their maturity, which assures us principal repayment and shields us against market volatility. Our basic investment strategy has really not changed in the last 12 years. Structured/floating rate securities were initially not available until July 1991, when we originally began to acquire them. Although acquiring these instruments did not in any way change our original investment strategy, they did add a potential of more volatility to the portfolio. Consistent monitoring of all factors of the structure of our portfolio has continued to allow us to take advantage of the upside of earning higher yields in a downward trending interest rate environment and at the same time, protect us if interest yields should turn around and start rising. In the fiscal year just ended, the above-stated investment strategy allowed us to earn an additional $153,835, 000 on Reverse Repurchase Agreement investments. This was the equal of adding 2.50% yield to our portfolio from doing these type of investments. These Reverse Repurchase earnings were at an all-time high compared to the previous fiscal year's all-time high of $61, 652,291. The typical treasurer's investing strategy is to trade or buy and sell government securities. This type of strategy involves the prospect of taking losses as well as gains. We do not take losses through the process of leveraging our securities and holding them to maturity. The Future: In last year's financial statement dated August 28, 1992, we said, "United States interest rates are low and could become lower. We do not expect them to rise because of the very slow growth out of the current recession. " The shape of the yield curve extends from the yield on the two-year treasury note to the 30-year maturity treasury bond yield. On September 3 , 1992, the two-year note was yielding 4 . 17%. On September 3 , 1993 it was yielding 3 .72%. On September 3, 1992, the 30-year bond was yielding 7. 42% and on September 3, 1993 it was yielding 5. 97% (and falling) . The spread in yield between the two-year note and the 30-year bond on September 3 , 1992 was 3 .25%. On September 3, 1993 it was 2 .25% (a marked narrowing of the shape of the yield curve) . What is and has been occurring is the lack of supply of longer maturity securities of five years and longer in respect to the amount of demand for investment securities of all types. Medium and large corporations have been restructuring and consolidating instead of borrowing money for expansion and have used the additional profits gained from restructuring to pay off debts on their balance sheets. All of this, and other factors, has affected interest rates. It is the threat of inflation returning because of perceived economic circumstances that would cause interest rates to rise. The long- term prospects are that we are going to have very slow growth; and, therefore, forestall inflation growth from happening that would have a material effect on interest rates rising. Interest rates could rise 100 basis points (1.00%) tomorrow, because of some temporary phenomena happening in the world. But higher interest rates are not at all sustainable. " n L-BoO'CiVM Orange County T..1.1Tee CdbG01 _ S...RN.CiLIUTie Board of Supervisors Page 4 September 10, 1993 ; The theory of lower interest rates through this decade, to my knowledge, was first put forward by Mr. Charles Clough, Chief Investment Strategist for Merrill Lynch 6 Company in December 1991. Now you will have to remember at that time George Bush seemed to have a lock on being reelected president. Bill Clinton was not at all a viable factor in the presidential race. Also, therefore, Mr. Clough's predictions or any other economist's predictions did not and could not perceive what Clinton's budget proposals would have on the economy. (sic) Mr. Clough talked of debt deflations that started in 1981 with the bust in the energy sector, migrated to the agricultural sector (you remember when the farmers were going broke) and then to the industrial sector. He spoke of the deflation of real estate values which now has continued to become much worse since December 1991. Real estate is by far the largest credit user in our economy. This deflation in real estate credit then signaled a migration of credit contraction in the nation's important business services sector. He stated then that money and credit, the signposts of spending, simply are not growing. He spoke of a contracting banking system which lacked borrowers and discouraged depositors by lowering deposit interest rates. He predicted that banks would gradually stop paying interest on checking accounts. In July of 1992, my bank paid me 2 1/2% on my personal checking account. In August of 1993, they are now paying me 1%. Mr. Clough spoke of a diminishing labor force growth which leads to lower interest rates, and he produced a graph from 1955 to 1995 which showed as the number in the labor force rose, so did interest rates. But as the labor force started to come down in 1985, so did interest rates. He said, "Today's problem isn't an unwillingness to lend, it is an unwillingness to borrow. Unless lending suddenly booms, the banks will likely hold more deposits than they can leverage. " He said that unless banks and insurance companies suddenly find themselves with a multitude of lending opportunities, they will find that after many years of aggressive bidding for deposits and insurance savings plans, they have attracted far too much in liability/deposits from the household sector. The household sector is lending $3.5 Trillion to the banking system in the form of deposit liability in one sort or another. It appears banks are coming to realize that they hold a too vast excess of deposits than the economy is likely able to borrow in the years ahead. The deposit interest rate will rightly remain among the lowest points on the yield curve. Returns are likely to remain discouragingly low. Even as investors clamor for safe securities, might the mighty Certificate of Deposits become extinct? His predictions are even more prophetic today where you see traditional Certificate of Deposit investors in a quandary with what to do with their investable monies because of very, very low CD rates. Many of those that can, are fleeing the CD market and are speculating in the stock market. Mr. Clough's other and more technical - predictions on low interest rates made in December 1991 and the spring of 192 are too involved and lengthy to restate here. But they all point to and establish the theory that we will have level if not lower interest rates through this decade. Certainly there is nothing on the horizon that would indicate that we will have rising interest rates for a minimum of three years. Based upon the current structure of the County Treasurer's Investment portfolio, we believe that our comparative higher interest earning rate yields over the next three fiscal years is insured. Robert L"Bob"Citron Orioni Cwnry TressarenTa Color Stint,Ana-Cdet. Board of Supervisors Page 5 September 10, 1993 - We expect to earn gross yields this fiscal year of 7.00% compared to the 8 .52% that we earned in the 1992-93 fiscal year. This prediction of 7. 00% is conservative, and although we could earn higher yields, the ever- lowering of investment interest rates which will affect the investment of new cash received in the November, December and March, April period forces us to make our predictions conservative. The great majority of our securities are rated AAA and AA by the credit rating agencies. We do not own any investment that there would be any liability of a principal loss due to the failure of the issuer. We do not believe that we have any other investments where there is a potential of a principal loss, only the prospect of an interest rate reduction in some of our structured floating rate instruments. But based on what you have read previously here, we think even that factor is a very minimal one. To assist us in obtaining our 7 . 00% or higher yield this fiscal year, in the months of July and August 1993, we have already booked, through the Reverse Repurchase Agreements process, profits of $82 , 089 , 406. We are continually gratified to be able to earn comparatively high interest earnings for all of our 187 different governmental clients. Most particularly, in these very severe economic conditions that have forced municipal agencies to lay off policemen, firemen and cut back other necessary services. What we are able to do for all our clients is best described by an unsolicited letter we received January 11, 1993 from the City of Laguna Beach (sic) who expressed their appreciation for the efforts the County Treasury did in investing their funds. Laguna Beach had about 98% of its surplus funds invested in the Treasury. Since we were then earning approximately 4 percentage points more than the State investment pool, the City would receive approximately $640, 000 per year in additional revenue because of the County Treasury's excellent efforts. This was extremely important for a smaller size city, particularly given the State reductions they have been forced to endure. We look forward to our continued relationship with all the districts for whom we invest. We also look forward to continue to manage these funds in the professional manner that constantly out-performs the market as a whole. Robert i Treasurer-Tax Collector RLC:jg Attachment Ra a L. Bob" "Ceron Orange Cmmn bewurenTae CWk r Sanu n .Canlomo £66L 3Nn H!DnO)JH1066L 3Nnr £6/9 £6/L Z6/9 Z6/L [6/9 L6/L 06/9 3IlviS b /UNno 177 m of 9 9 m m 8 m r 6 OL VINHO=]n 'O JO 31ViS 'SA kiNnOO 3JNVUO SG IDIJl1NDNiSDANI GD-100d ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR EXHIBIT A ACCOUNTABILITY ' INDICATED DATES (000 Ommed) Fiscal Years Ended June 30, June 30, June 30, 1991 1992 1991 CASH AND BANK ACCOUNTS (COMMINGLED) Checking Accounts and Cash Mthibit B) S 38.181 S 60,984 $ 39,933 Time Deposits 138,500 118.562 64.000 Total Cash, Checking Accounts and Time Deposits 376.681 179.546 103,911 COMMINGLED FUNDS INVESTED a7D-BBTT C) Negotiable Securities (Cost) 4.177.531 i.476.015 2.694.00 SPECIFIC FUNDS INVESTED ODDUBTT D) Negotiable Securities and Time Deposits: County General 13,965 0 0 Deferred Comperuation 65.514 42,924 52,795 Foothill Circulation Phasing Plan 0 4,055 0 Eastern FoodulVI'mraportation 0 654 0 Miscellaneous Districts Q Funds 500 295 100 Special District Bond Funds 645.050 88,273 136,457 School Districts 199,026 0 0 Total Spec Funds Invested 924,055 136.201 189.352 RETIREMENT SYSTEM INVESTMENTS (A) Short Term 188,655 219,772 137,875 Long Term 1.71 .297 1,462,650 1,371,199 Total Retirement System Investments (Excludes Commingled Funds) 1.919.952 1,682.422 1.509.074 TREASURER'S TOTAL ACCOUNTABILITY 7398.219 5,474,184 4.496.359 OUTSTANDING CHECKS -ESTIMATED (B) 96.000 — OUTSTANDING CHECKS-ACTUAL(B) 143.699 106.221 (A) - Details of financial activities of Orange County Employees Retirement System are shown in separate reports issued on a calendar year basis. (B) - County and Special District Checks $ 37,855 S 29,800 S 41,230 School District Checks 104,225 61,600 62,552 Trust Fund Checks 1.619 4,600 2,419 Other School District Checks 143,699 96,000 lo6.221 Trust Fund Checks ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR E18-IBIT;B CASH ACTIVITY INDICATED YEARS (000 Omitted) Fiscal Years Ended June 30. June 30. June 30, 1993 1992 1991 CHECXING ACCOUNTS AND CASH BEGINNING OF YEARS (EXHIBIT A) S 60,984 S 39,933 S 53,545 RECEIPTS Investment Pool Proceeds (Commingled) 217,402,581 164,786,368 128,506.948 Investment Pool Proceeds (Specific) 4,978,296 1,882.237 795,488 Taxes (Deposited by Tax Collector) 2,115,133 2,014,321 1,862,781 Short Term Loans (Fifteen Months or less) 242,535 211.008 145,242 Bond (Note) Sales 171,305 27,533 73,535 State of California 1,944,710 1,814,054 1,766,161 Interest Received From Investments 364,147 277,765 243,212 Other Sources 2.944.877 1,100.818 1.254.732 Total Receipts-Fisml Years 210,161,584 172.114.104 134.648.099 Sub-Totals 230.22,1668 172,154,017 134.701.644 DISBURSEMENTS Investments Placed (Conuningled) 218,324,035 165,622,945 128,750,072 Invesunents Placed (Specific) 5,766,150 1.829,086 740,118 Regular Disbursements 6.096,20, 4.641,022 5.171.521 Total Disbursements-Fiscal Years 230.186.387 172.091,09 134.661.711 CHECIING ACCOUNTS AND CASH ENDS OF YEARS WOUBIT A) M181 60,994 39.933 ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR EXHIBIT C _l COMMINGLED FUNDS INVESTED INDICATED YEARS (000 Omined) Fiscal Years Ended June 30, June 30, June 30, 1991 1992 1991 INVESTMENT AC TV1TY BEGINNING OF YEARS Time Deposits S 118,562 S 64,000 $ 114,017 Negotiable Securities 3.476.015 2.694.000 2,400,859 Totals 3.594,577 2,758,000 2,514.876 INVESTMENTS PLACED DURING YEARS 218,124,015 165,622,945 128.750.072 Subtotals 221,918,612 168,380,945 131,264,948 INVESTMENTS MATURED & SOLD DURING YEARS 217,402,581 164,786,168 128,506,948 END OF YEARS Time deposits 338,500 118,562 64,000 Negotiable Securities 4,177,531 3.476.015 2,694,000 Totals 4,516,011 3.594.577 2,758,000 INTEREST DISTRIBUTIONS County General Fund 600 12,051 14,620 Deferred Compensation Fund 1.965 239 86 Employees Retirement System 5.878 51353 4,067 Esruov+Accounts 3,317 2,520 851 Fire Protection 2,703 2,550 1,483 Flood Control 14,191 12,422 13,029 Foothill Circulation Phasing Plan Z711 5,038 5,540 Foothill/Eastern Transportauon 1,600 1,973 878 Harbors Beaches &Parks 3,879 3,665 4,191 Housing Authority 1,179 1,052 940 Impounded Taxes Trust 1,888 1,118 1,544 John Wayne Airport 3,361 2,256 3,116 Local Transportation Fund 1,870 1,473 968 Outside Agencies 68,763 29,363 10,715 Road Fund 4.939 4.951 5,445 Sanitation Districts 24,259 20.248 15,606 School Districts 60,825 53.925 56,106 Self Insurance Funds 7,535 6,884 6,468 Special District Bond Funds 1ZI54 11,584 9,991 Taxes Collected-Awaiting Distribution' Secured 8,692 7.738 6,794 Unsecured 2,582 1,698 1,781 State Redemption 2,294 1,681 1,585 Supplemental 11189 1,540 1,402 Other 1.296 469 471 Thoroughfare&Bridge Program 1,920 1,884 2.416 Transit Authority 23,570 20,764 26,426 Waste Management Enterprise Fund 7,065 5,299 3,920 Water District 4,992 5,010 5,542 Miscellaneous Districts & Funds 21,296 20,099 20,360 Measure M Funds 3,794 0 0 San Joaquin Hills Trans 1,479 0 0 Totals V3,786 244.847 226141 ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR EXFBBRp SPECIFIC FUNDS INVESTED INDICATED YEARS (000 Onuned) Fiscal Years Ended June 30, June 30, - June 30, 1993 1992 1991 1\VEMIENF ACTIVITY BEGINNING OF YEARS Time Deposits S 0 S 2,900 S 0 Negotiable Securities 136.201 186,452 244,721 Totals 136,201 189.352 244,722 IN VESTNIENiS PLACED DURING YEARS 5.766.150 1.829.086 740118 Subtoral5 5,902,351 2,018,438 984,840 LNVESI71.1ENIS MATURED &SOLD DURING YEAR 4,978.296 1,882,217 795,488 END OF YEARS Time Deposits 39,857 0 2,900 Negotiable Securities 884,198 116,201 _ 186,452 Totals 924,055 116.201 189.352 I',TEREST DIMMU11ONS County General Fund 39,298 26,228 0 Deferred Compensation Fund 3,094 4,817 5,102 Foothill Circulation Phasing Plan 59 90 1,375 FoodulVEa.stem Transportation 10 14 0 Special District Bond Funds 12.294 6,089 12,651 Miscellaneous Districts & Funds 840 1.9 43 55.595 37 257 19.171 Totals The earnings from cormrungled investments is shown on Exhibit C and the earnings from speck investments is shown above. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA October 14, 1993 1oB BOX B-2 o C 7 Box 2] FOUNTAIN vnLLFv.CnL6CaNia 92]26.812] I11<1962.2411 STAFF REPORT "Teeter Plan" Property Tax Allocations At the September Fiscal Policy Committee meeting, Chairman Swan asked staff to prepare a report for the October meeting on the "Teeter Plan." The "Teeter Plan" is an alternative method of property tax allocation used in five counties and recently approved for use in Orange County for 1993-94. Counties operating under the Teeter Plan allocate property taxes to jurisdictions based upon the total amount of property taxes levied, not the amount collected. The entire 1993-94 secured tax levy will be allocated in nine installments without regard for delinquencies. The same allocation will apply to user fees collected on the tax bill. In order to implement this alternative allocation method, the County will first forward to the Districts 95% of the outstanding delinquent taxes and fees. The remaining 5% is required by the enabling legislation to be retained and deposited into the County Tax Loss Fund. Preliminary estimates from the County value this one-time payment as follows: District Delinquent Taxes Delinquent Fees 1 $116,731 $695,449 2 580,823 1,094,138 3 694,941 956,165 5 161,545 111,957 6 92,999 252,052 7 220,306 215,387 11 145,411 172,821 13 -0- 59,013 Total $2,012,756 $3,556,982 Under the current allocation method, the County retains the penalty on delinquent property taxes, but remits the interest to the "taxing" agencies. The disadvantage to the Districts of the Teeter Plan is the loss of this interest. The ability to do a short-term financing and to keep the interest in the Tax Loss Fund is what makes the Teeter Plan work for the County. Given the spread between the rate at which the County can borrow funds to finance the gross property tax advances and the interest on delinquencies, the County should be able to support the Teeter Plan method. (The taxes advanced to the Districts will earn interest through our regular cash management program.) Teeter Plan Property Tax Allocation Page 2 October 14, 1993 The primary advantages to the Districts of the Teeter Plan method of allocation are: • The one-time infusion of over $5.5 million for delinquent fees and taxes. • Annual receipt of 100% of the tax allocation. • Interest earnings on 100% of the tax allocation. • Eliminates concern over rising delinquency rates. • Simplification of cash flow projections and budgeting. The County Auditor-Controller has advised staff that because the Districts use the County Treasurer as a tax depository, we have automatically been included in the Teeter Plan allocation method which was approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 29, 1993. No further action is required by the Directors. GGS:lc WF:JAMD=RC.MTG%SR10-20,93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS M ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA October 14, 1993 Ro.eox em E NTRIN VALLEY.=FORNIA 92729-8127 71119W.2Efl STAFF REPORT PROPOSED PRIDE AWARDS During the past few months, several Personal Responsibility in Daily Effort (PRIDE) proposals have been evaluated. Following is a summary of those safety or cost- saving proposals that staff recommends for certificates and cash awards, in accordance with the Board-approved PRIDE program. Five of these six PRIDE proposals are estimated to save the Districts approximately $20,959 annually, while the other is for safety improvements. The six recommended awards total $2,195.00. PRIDE No. 225 - Scrubber Pumo Flow Switch Replacement This suggestion proposes that 12 metallic flow switches located within the foul air scrubber system piping be replaced with a new corrosion-resistant switch which costs about 50% less than the metallic switch, and should last at least twice as long. The first year's net savings are estimated to be $3,777.60, and the cash award for this suggestion is $378.00. PRIDE No. 234 - Perforated Steam Line Inside Scum Line This suggestion recommends installing a steam line along the top of the scum pipe section leading to the basin trough so that when this area becomes plugged, the operator can open the steam line valve to heat up and melt the scum in the plugged area. The suggestion will help prevent equipment damage and will reduce operator time to clear plugged lines. A $100.00 cash award is proposed. PRIDE No. 260 (Phase 2) - 12-Hour Holiday Scheduling This is Phase 2 of a PRIDE approved in January 1993. This phase proposes that Plant 2 operators who staff the plant 24 hours each day, work 12-hour days, thus reducing overtime pay required for holidays on which the operators must work. Phase 1 implemented the change for supervisors. Phase 2 of the recommendation has an estimated net annual savings of $7,425.00. Ten percent, or $742.00, is being recommended for an award. PRIDE No. 262 - Cover Gaskets This proposal recommends installing neoprene gaskets on metal covers such as manhole covers and sampling covers to provide a better seal. Odor emissions and corrosion around the covers as well as labor to reseal the covers would be reduced. Net annual labor savings of $1,000.00 would result. The proposed cash award for this suggestion is $100.00. Proposed PRIDE Awards Page 2 October 14, 1993 PRIDE No 281 - Scum Pumoing Procedure Modification This suggestion proposes modifications to the scum pumping operation at the new Plant 1 primary basins. The installation of dual switches will reduce labor hours, reduce accident potential, and reduce the amount of water pumped into the digesters. An award of $624.00 or ten percent of the first year's savings is proposed. PRIDE No. 321 - Cleaning the Distillation System This proposal is to clean the Environmental Science Laboratory distillation system by backflushing it with deionized water, rather than flushing. This change will save water, electricity and labor hours over the old method of flushing for a period of one hour. The resulting first year's net savings is $2,511 .23, and an award of $251 is proposed. GGS:lc SRMM.B3e AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT 4, „avoll vn p Ifj IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ° SIne.19S 94"CE co Overview • Compliance issues & costs are rapidly increasing. Continuous promulgation of AQ regulations by regulators. Increased air emissions due to facility expansions. • Provide information to help make informed AQ decisions for present and future challenges. y Board of Directors Management y Staff Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 1 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT "15 aevelm. °o°jsi IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ° S4c191. y p "Gf WU Goals • Minimize compliance costs. • Minimize potential air emission impact from our wastewater treatment plants. • Complement Districts' 2020 Vision Wastewater Management Master Plan . Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 2 ��" "AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT " °^ IMPLEMENTATION PLAN $, 1A.' R�NGf COOL` Proposed Proiect Provide the following information to the year 2020 : • Estimation on emissions. • Existing & anticipated regulatory requirements. • Potential compliance strategies. • Potential risk reduction strategies. • Existing & future "Good Neighbor" Program. • Existing & future staffing requirements. • Overall costs of potential alternatives. Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 3 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT to IMPLEMENTATION y 5 e°luvn O.e if IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1, °n 3yq 195. q AMGE COOt9` Objectives • Characterize facility processes and emissions. • Identify air quality impacts from regulatory development and facility expansion. • Design solutions to address AQ impacts in the most effective manner. Air Quality Division October27, 1993 Page 4 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT "y o.vaua. q.°Sr9 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 'r °V 9 "GE C°°N` Development Approach Two Phases : Phase I - Performed by Districts' Personnel • Characterizes emissions and facility expansions. • Identifies Districts' compliance requirements. • Models impact on community. • Screens emission control strategies. • Describes organization responsibilities. Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 5 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT 5'Nyv Ae`prSq IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Sine 195 pANGE coo Development Approach - continued Phase II - Consulting Engineers • Refines control strategies and provides preliminary design and costs. • Develops emission and risk reduction programs. • Identifies research and development needs. • Provides guidance for future staffing resources and organizational responsibilities. • Prepares financial costs. Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 6 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ° Sye.19S9 p4"oE coo Schedule Phase I • November 1993 - July 1994 Phase II • July 1994 - April 1995 Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 7 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN a,NGE GE COUt+` Estimated Costs TOTAL PHASE PHASE II AMOUNT Staff's Labor (includes $ 85,000 $ 619000 $146,000 benefits & overhead) Districts' Vehicle/Equip. 2,000 2,000 41000 Consultant 225,000 225,000 TOTALS $ 877000 $288,000 $375,000 Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 8 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT 4{ o.oal.e O..OJ.1J4 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 'r Oq ^v.195. y 4NGf COUP, Recommendations • Authorize $375,000 budget for preparation of Air Quality Management Implementation Plan. • Direct staff to proceed with Phase I of the Plan. • Authorize Selection Committee to solicit proposals for Phase II of the Plan . Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 9 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA I ELLIS AVENUE PO BB%6129 EWMAIN VALLEY"LROPMC 92]2B-B12) 111A1962d411 October 20, 1993 STAFF REPORT Air OualitV Management Implementation Plan SUMMARY Staff is recommending preparation of an Air Quality Management Implementation Plan (Plan) at an estimated cost of $375,000. The proposed project will develop a document that will provide the Districts with the necessary information to make informed decisions about our present and future air quality challenges. It will complement the Districts' 2020 Vision Wastewater Management Master Plan (2020 Vision) and our mission of protecting overall environmental quality. OVERVIEW New air quality regulations are continuously promulgated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) , the California Air Resource Board (ARB) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) . Many result in significant costs and compliance issues for the Districts. The impact of these new requirements is compounded by our need to build new facilities which produce increased air emissions but are necessary to meet new service demands and to satisfy increasingly stringent water pollution control requirements. To effectively address this ever-changing air quality control universe, it is advantageous that the Districts continue its proactive approach by developing an overall Plan. The Plan would address the facility improvements identified in 2020 Vision while going into greater depth than we ever have before concerning air quality issues. Like 2020 Vision, the Plan would develop a focussed five-year strategy for managing air quality while maintaining a 25-year planning horizon. Amended approximately every five years, the Plan, like 2020 Vision, would be adjusted to meet changing regulatory and facility needs. The Plan will assist the staff and the Joint Boards in their deliberations on short-term and long-term air quality management strategies, while continuing our mission of cost-effectively protecting marine water quality and public health. r Air Quality Management Implementation Plan October 20, 1993 Page Two of Four GOALS i OBJECTIVES The goals of the proposed Plan are to minimize the cost of complying with air quality laws and regulations, and to minimize the potential impact of the air emissions from our wastewater treatment plants. The Plan will complement 2020 Vision. The objectives of the Plan will be to provide the following information for long-term (to the year 2020) air quality compliance: • estimation of emissions, • existing and anticipated regulatory requirements, • potential compliance strategies including alternatives and their relative feasibility, • potential risk reduction strategies, • existing and future "Good Neighbor" Program, • present and future staffing requirements, and • overall costs of potential air quality management alternatives. PROPOSED PROJECT Staff proposes that the development of this Plan will be accomplished in two phases. Phase I The Districts' staff will perform Phase I which will consist of nine tasks. These tasks will include an enhancement of our air quality information network for the Districts. This information will encompass both current and future air quality rules and regulations, facility emissions and permit compliance requirements. An initial screening of potential emission control alternatives for future construction projects will be performed, and the Districts' present staff and their respective responsibilities devoted to air quality management activities will be identified. See Attachment 1 for a discussion of the nine Phase I tasks. Phase II In Phase II of the Plan, a consultant is proposed to help accomplish seven tasks. The focus will be on proposing emissions reduction programs and risk reduction programs, identifying areas of needed research and strategies for conducting it, and future proactive actions. See Attachment 1 for a discussion of the seven Phase II tasks. Air Quality Management Implementation Plan October 20, 1993 Page Three of Four PROJECT MANAGEMENT Because these issues are so complex and consensus building is so important to our long-term success, it is vital that the Engineering, operations, Maintenance and Technical Services Departments be closely consulted during the development of the Plan. Therefore, the management of this project will be overseen by a staff steering committee which will provide periodic briefings to the General Manager and the Boards of Directors. The members of this committee will be comprised of the above Department Heads and the Air Quality Division Manager. SCHEDULE Development of the Plan is expected to take approximately 16 months for both Phase I and Phase II. If approved by the Directors, the Plan will start with Phase I in mid-November 1993; and Phase II would start in July of 1994. The Plan would be completed in April 1995. A list of the tasks is as follows: PEASE I (November 1993 - July 1994) To be performed by staff. Task 1: Baseline Emissions Task 2: Future Facilities Emissions Task 3: Laws and Regulations Task 4: Compliance Requirements for Existing Facilities Task 5: Compliance Requirements for Future Facilities Task 6: Emission Control Alternatives Preliminary Screening Task 7: Present Staffing overview Task 8: Existing "Good Neighbor" Program Task 9: Phase I Report PEASE II (July 1994 - April 1995) To be performed by consultant(s) . Task 1: Project Management by Districts Task 2: Emission Control Alternatives Refinement Task 3: Emission/Risk Reduction Program Task 4: Research and Development Task 5: Future Staff Overview Task 6: Costs Overview Task 7: Future "Good Neighbor" Program ESTIMATED COSTS Staff estimates the total cost of the Plan at $375,000. This estimate is detailed as follows: Air Quality Management Implementation Plan October 20, 1993 Page Four of Four TOTAL DESCRIPTION PHASE I PHASE II AMOUNT Staff's Labor (includes $ 85,000 $ 61, 000 $146,000 benefits and overhead) Districts' Vehicle/Equipment 2 ,000 2, 000 4 ,000 Consultant 225,000 225,000 TOTALS 87,000 288. 000 lim 000 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Boards of Directors take the following actions: 1) Authorize preparation of an Air Quality Management Implementation Plan in the estimated amount of $375, 000, and Direct staff to proceed with Phase I of the Plan; and 2) Authorize the Selection Committee to solicit proposals from qualified consulting engineering firms, in accordance with the Districts' professional services procurement policy, to provide necessary services for Phase II of the Plan for consideration by the Directors at a future meeting, upon the conclusion of Phase I. EMT:LKH:dk Ref#340247.rp COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS a ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 100 ELLISAVENUE A.80[8127 FOUWAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92720.0127 01419822411 October 20, 1993 ATTACHMENT 1 Air Quality Management Implementation Plan PHASE I Task 1 - Baseline Emissions This task will provide an overview of the various sources and quantities of emissions that the Districts' facilities emit by compiling monitoring and emission estimates on our two facilities. Staff will rely principally on existing data. Information will include emissions of criteria pollutants, odor pollutants and air toxics. Task 2 - Future Facilities Emissions This task will determine predicted future emissions for new facilities described in the Districts' 2020 Wastewater Master Plan. It will model the impact of the existing and future emissions on the community, and perform health risk assessments for the projected future emissions. These modeling efforts may provide future guidance for the siting of new facilities to reduce our impact on the community. Task 3 - Laws and Regulations This task will be an executive summary of the existing and anticipated air quality requirements affecting the Districts. Task 4 - Compliance Reauirements for Existing Facilities This task will focus on the existing Districts' facilities and the applicable requirements for achieving compliance with present and anticipated rules and regulations. Staff will use published rulemaking calendars, its ongoing discussions with regulatory agency staff members, and the mandates of federal and state laws to anticipate the future landscape of rules and regulations. Task 5 - Compliance Requirements for Future Facilities This task will focus on the Districts' future facilities and the requirements for achieving compliance with existing and anticipated rules and regulations. Attachment 1 Air Quality Management Implementation Plan October 20, 1993 Page Two of Four Task 6 - Emission Control Alternatives. Preliminary Screening This task will provide a preliminary list of alternatives for controlling emissions of criteria pollutants, odor pollutants and air toxics pollutants. For each of these pollutants, a discussion of the various measures available to the Districts will be reviewed. This includes pollution prevention, source control, operational modifications, process modifications and end-of-stack control technologies. Task 7 - Present Staffing Overview This task will provide an overview of the present organization alignment and current staffing costs devoted to air quality management activities. This overview will include a detailed breakdown of present responsibilities for all pertinent departments. Task 8 - Existing "Good Neighbor" Program This task will provide information identifying the Districts' past and present proactive air quality actions performed to improve air quality conditions in and around the Districts' wastewater collection and treatment facilities. It will also discuss the Districts' strategies and commitment to air quality. Task 9 - Phase I Report This task will compile the information developed from each task into a Phase I report. This will be reviewed by the Air Quality Division to provide quality assurance, and then distributed to the applicable departments and management for their review and comment prior to finalization of the document. The Phase I report will be conveyed to the Boards for appropriate action. PHASE II Task 1 - Project Management by the Districts This task will be performed by the Air Quality Division staff who will oversee the project. In performing this task, guidance and direction will be provided to the consultant as needed, in addition to coordinating internal meetings. Close consultation with all applicable departments will occur. r Attachment 1 Air Quality Management Implementation Plan October 20, 1993 Page Three of Four Task 2 - Emission Control Alternatives. Refinement This task will provide refined projected cost estimates for the control alternatives discussed in Phase I of this project. In addition, it will include a refined alternative control equipment analysis, a discussion of costs for containment, conveyance and monitoring, where applicable, and prioritize control strategies. Task 3 - Emission/Risk Reduction Program This task will provide an emissions reduction program for the Districts' present and future operations. It will also provide a five-year risk reduction plan which will meet the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 1402 and California Law SB 1731. Task 4 - Research and Development This task will identify potential research project requirements for present and future needs based on known technology limitations, new and anticipated air quality regulations, and future operations. This task will also provide a discussion on areas where technologies look promising, but sufficient data or field experience is not available. Funding strategies, including grants and cooperative agreements, will be explored. Task 5 - Future Staffing Overview This task will evaluate and provide recommendations for possible future staffing requirements and an organization structure for the Districts. This information will be presented in a detailed breakdown of future personnel required for performing air quality duties, and responsibilities for each department. Close collaboration, input and review will come from each applicable department as the consultant evaluates and makes recommendations contained in this task. Task 6 - Costs Overview This task will provide the costs of all air quality compliance activities, including compliance with present and future rules and regulations, implementation of technology for compliance, the emissions reduction program, and proactive actions and research. A timetable will also be developed which will show the cost of air quality expenditures in reference to 2020 Vision. 1 Attachment 1 Air Quality Management Implementation Plan October 20, 1997 Page Four of Four Task 7 - Future "Good Neighbor" Program This task will provide information identifying the Districts' future proactive air quality actions to remain a "Good Neighbor" to the individuals living and working in the vicinity of our wastewater collection and treatment facilities. It will discuss strategies pertaining to the Districts' future policies and commitment to air quality. MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION r,C1�...wiian G.o Gsi4 DEMONSTRATION PROJECT .' l i G .0 19N195.� ,NGE CUU Overview • November 1992 authorization to conduct Biofiltration Demonstration Project for $280,000. • April 1993 authorization of specific-term employment agreement to support project. • Authorized contracts with co-funding agencies : SCAQMD - $125,000 WERF - 309000 SCE - 50,000 Total Co-funding $205,000 Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 1 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT 'r N ° a 91. °ANGE C00 Biofiltration : Technology & Benefits • Gas treatment technology that uses microorganisms. • Ability to remove odorous compounds, VOCs and air toxics. • No cross-media impacts. • Low operating costs. • Improved safety. Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 2 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ,2 ° g ° INGEC p "' CUU� Scope of Research : Five Tasks 1 . Review literature on Biofiltration. 2. Develop an experimental protocol. 3. Test bench-scale biofilters. 4. Test pilot-scale biofilters. 5. Conceptually design a full-scale biofilter. Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 3 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION pZ4gvvnVeliwn O.opJSJ fi DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ° J : N p swn l9f NGE COO � Status of Project • Contracts signed in June 1993 with co-funding agencies and USC. • Completed Literature Review Report in August 1993. • Completed Experimental Protocol in September 1993. • Constructed and began testing of bench-scale reactors. 11 reactors 4 different media 1st of 3 experimental runs Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 4 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT $ ° b.n 19Y NINE c°° t' Future Activities • Two additional bench-scale experimental runs planned . • Design and construct pilot-scale biofilters. • Prepare conceptual design of full-scale biofilters. Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 5 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION _ 5,�""' O� ,i ...wnx. O.60j�r9 DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ' O g O ,,,,COO E00N� Recommendation for Additional Funding • Additional $100,000 is needed to support project. • Funds needed for: 1 . Analytical Services $ 71 ,000 2. Temporary In-house Staffing Services 21 ,000 3. Supplies & Materials 8,000 Proposed Additional Funding $100,000 Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 6 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION 41 `a�pa^ O SJ DEMONSTRATION PROJECT I"GE CUU Reasons for Additional Funding Analytical Services : • Technical Advisory Committee comments on Experimental Protocol recommend additional testing. • SCAQMD mandated testing identified new compounds of concern . • New microbiological test methods became apparent. Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 7 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION "1 ..=vea. p sOifl DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ° $ � O ,°GE COOt1, Reasons for Additional Funding - continued In-house Staffing : • Delay in contract start date. • Start-up period for internal Laboratory services. Supplies & Materials : • Unforeseen needs for conducting testing . Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 8 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION ,1 ...vex a p •cif U DEMONSTRATION PROJECT N A,"'cE coo Proposed Demonstration Project Funding Existinq Revision Proposed SCAQMD $125,000 $125,000 WERF 30,000 30,000 SCE 50,000 50,000 Subtotal Outside $2057000 $2059000 $205,000 Funding CSDOC 75,000 100,000 175,000 TOTAL $280,000 $175,000 $380,000 Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 9 MODIFICATION TO BIOFILTRATION 5"N" "" °ry DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ° N Eco l Recommendations • Modify the authorization to conduct the Biofiltration Demonstration Project to a revised budget of $3809000. • Authorize staff to procure additional contracted analytical services in accordance with established procurement policies. • Authorize General Manager to extend specific-term employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for an additional 3 1 /2 months for a Not-to-Exceed funding of $58,000. Air Quality Division October 27, 1993 Page 10 .z COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1 6 EW6 AVENUE P.D.Box e127 F WMN VALLEY.MLIFOPNIA 9272&BIW 0141662-?all October 20, 1993 STAFF REPORT Modifications to Biofiltration Demonstration Proiect SIIMMARY The purpose of this staff report is to provide the Directors with a status report on the Biofiltration Research Project that was authorized in November 1992, and to request an increase of $100,000 in the project authorization, from $280,000 to. $380,000, to cover unanticipated costs for necessary additional analytical testing services, research supplies for the biofilter reactors, and additional funding for temporary staffing for the project. This will increase the Districts' contribution to the project from $75,000 to $175,000, while outside grant funding would remain unchanged at $205,000. OVERVIEW Last November, the Boards authorized staff to conduct a Biofiltration Demonstration Project to study the feasibility of using biofiltration to remove toxic, volatile organic and odorous air constituents from the air emissions of our wastewater treatment plants in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach. At that time, the estimated cost of the demonstration project was $280,000. Staff reported to the Directors that other parties would be interested in co-funding this research project, including the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) , the Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) and Southern California Edison (SCE) . At that time, SCE's funding authorization was incomplete, so the Boards authorized the General Manager to enter into contracts with SCAQMD (contributing $125, 000) and WERF (contributing $30,000) and authorized staff to enter into contracts with subconsultants and contractors to assist in the demonstration project. Last April, staff reported to the Boards that SCE would co-fund $50,000 of the demonstration project (for a total outside funding amount of $205,000) ; that additional in-house staffing was required on a temporary basis to accomplish the work; and that the existing estimated budget amount of $280,000 was believed r Modifications to Biofiltration Demonstration Project October 20, 1993 Page Two of Seven sufficient to cover the anticipated costs of this cutting-edge research project. The Boards then authorized staff to enter into a contract with SCE and into a specific-term employment agreement with Shabbir Basrai, a chemical engineer, to assist the Districts for a one-year term. BIOFILTRATION TECHNOLOGY Biofiltration is a gas treatment technology that utilizes microorganisms to biologically degrade the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) , toxic and odorous compounds that are contained in contaminated airstreams. In biofiltration, air is passed through a wet, biologically active porous medium. Pollutants such as hydrogen sulfide, VOC's and toxics transfer from the air to the water in the biofilter where they are degraded by the microorganisms. It uses very little energy other than a fan to evacuate the air space of the process unit and distribute it to the biofilter, and a pump to occasionally flush it to control pH and to add moisture and nutrients to the filter media. POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF BIOFILTRATION The potential advantages of biofiltration are that the contaminants are converted to harmless products, no hazardous residues are generated, and operating costs are significantly lower than traditional treatment technologies such as chemical scrubbers or thermal treatment. In addition, biofilters do not require large amounts of energy or chemicals (as do incinerators or scrubbers) , or costly regeneration procedures (such as activated carbon) . SCOPE OF RESEARCH PROJECT The research work, first proposed in November 1992, consists of five tasks, as follows: 1. Task I - Review literature on biofiltration. 2. Task II - Develop an experimental protocol. 3. Task III - Test bench-scale biofilters. 4. Task IV - Test pilot-scale biofilters. 5. Task V - Conceptually design a full-scale biofilter. STATUS OF PROJECT The research project began on June 1, 1993, after finally signing contracts with the grant funding participants and the University Modifications to Biofiltration Demonstration Project October 20, 1993 Page Three of Seven of Southern California (USC) who is providing technical advice. In August, the research team completed its literature report on biofiltration. This report encompassed the review of over 120 publications in the United States and overseas. The experimental protocol, which describes the methodology and schedule for conducting the research, was completed in August. In late August, eleven bench-scale bioreactors using both organic and inorganic media were placed into operation. The first of three experimental runs have been completed. The research team is currently. evaluating the physical, chemical and biological data on the biofilters. Future activities include the design and construction of the pilot-scale reactors, and adding chemicals and specific microbial strains to the bioreactors to evaluate their performance. The project is currently scheduled to be completed on June 1, 1994. RECOMMENDATION FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING Additional funding in the amount of $100,000 is recommended in order to meet the objectives of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project. The majority of this funding is needed to support additional analytical testing of the bioreactors, in addition to funding increases for supplies and staffing. The reasons for the additional funding are provided below. Additional Analytical Services When the budget for the demonstration project was developed, staff believed that the project could be managed by existing staff resources. However, it later became apparent that the full demands of the research and reporting to funding agencies, coupled with compliance demands being placed on existing staff by new regulatory programs such as Title III federal Maximum Achievable Control Technology Standards (MALT) required under the 1990 Clean Air Act, Title V, and South Coast Air Quality Management District's (SCAQMD's) Rule 1179 (JEIP) and Rule 1402, would make it impossible to implement this project without additional staff resources. Subsequently, $30, 000 of the $65, 000 originally targeted for analytical testing was internally transferred from the contracts' line item along with an additional $15,000 from the equipment and supplies line items for a total of $45,000 to the staffing line item to fund the Board approved, April 14, 1993, specific-term employment contract with Shabbir Basrai. t Modifications to Biofiltration Demonstration Project October 20, 1993 Page Four of Seven Staff believed that the remaining funds for outside laboratory testing, along with the test results that would be obtained through a recently purchased portable gas chromatograph, would meet the minimum testing needs of the project. In July of this year, staff requested comments on our Experimental Protocol from a Technical Advisory Committee consisting of university professors, consultants, air quality specialists from Publicly owned Treatment Works (POTWs) and specialists within the funding agencies. Comments received emphasized that more testing than originally anticipated should be performed to effectively evaluate the biofilters' performance. Based upon this feedback and the discovery of additional target compounds during analysis of the Districts' air emissions to comply with a SCAQMD-mandated testing program, staff is now proposing that we increase our testing efforts. Recommendations for the level of additional testing are provided below: 1. Currently, staff is contracting with an outside laboratory to analyze for total VOCs in our off-gas on a monthly basis. Staff recommends increasing the number of data points for each bioreactor from three (3) to six (6) to provide a better statistical evaluation of the data. The Districts' laboratory is not currently prepared to conduct this analysis and neither can the portable gas chromatograph. Staff is, therefore, recommending to increase this analysis to bi-weekly at an additional cost of $20,000. 2. We did not originally anticipate analyzing certain VOC compounds of interest (aldehydes and ketones) . Recent testing performed at our plant under the SCAQMD-mandated Joint Emissions Inventory Program (JEIP) indicates that these compounds may be present in significant quantities in our off-gas, making their evaluation for reduction in biofilters even more important. The Districts' laboratory is not currently equipped to conduct this analysis, so the services of an outside laboratory are required. The estimated additional cost is $21,000. 3. The Districts' laboratory is developing analytical capabilities for a wide list of specific VOCs. But the capability is evolving more slowly than we had initially anticipated. Thus, we are unable to perform the analyses for the lower price that our laboratory would have been 4 Modifications to Biofiltration Demonstration Project October 20, 1993 Page Five of Seven capable of. Outside laboratory support is, therefore, required to obtain the data until our laboratory's air quality analysis section is fully operational. A two-month time period for contracting for this service is estimated at an additional cost of $18,000. 4. A new test method for analyzing specific microorganisms present in the bioreactors has recently come to our attention, and is recommended by the project's Technical Advisory committee. This information is useful because it will allow us to correlate performance of the biofilters with the presence of specific microorganisms. The result of this effort could lead to further study to isolate and culture those specific microorganisms most useful to degrade compounds of concern. Funds were not originally budgeted for this test. Microbial Insights, Inc. , the firm that conducts these analyses, is offering this service to the Districts for a significant discount price of $84 per sample, which is much less than their usual price of $235 per sample. Staff is proposing to have Microbial Insights, Inc. , conduct these tests for an additional cost of $12,000. The total estimated increase for analytical service, items 1 through 4 above, is $71,000. As with the existing laboratory services contracts, these additional services would be procured in accordance with the Districts' procurement policies. The current outside contract services budget is $144,000 with $35,000 allocated to analytical laboratory service contracts. . The proposed increase for additional analytical services raises the analytical contracts' costs to $106,000, and the total contracts' budget from $144,000 to $215,000. Additional Temporary In-house Staffing Services 1. The specific-term employment agreement for Shabbir Basrai approved by the Boards in April 1993 to work in this project, expires April 15, 1994. Staff anticipates that Mr. Basrai's services will be required until July 31, 1994, to assist the Districts in completing the research, preparing the final report, and meeting with funding and oversight agencies during their review of the report. The cost for this extension is an additional $13,000. Modifications to Biofiltration Demonstration Project October 20, 1993 Page Six of Seven 2. Because of the additional testing required to evaluate the biofilters' performance, our in-house laboratory costs for the 12 month project will also exceed the budget. Therefore, staff recommends increasing the in-house staffing services for this work by an additional $8,000. Additional Supplies and Materials The complexity of the research project has resulted in significant expenditures for various equipment, supplies and chemicals in support of the construction and testing of the bioreactors. As of September 30, 1993, the supplies budget has been 95% expended, and additional sampling bags, chemicals, and materials are needed for testing the existing bench-scale reactors and for the construction and testing of the pilot-scale reactors. The estimated cost for additional supplies and materials is $8,000. These items are purchased pursuant to the Districts' procurement policies. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS Staff recommends amending the Boards' actions of November 18, 1992 and April 14, 1993, authorizing staff to conduct the Biofiltration Demonstration Project, as follows: 1. Modify the authorization to conduct the Biofiltration Demonstration Project to reflect revised estimated project costs and funding as follows: DEMONSTRATION PROJECT BUDGET ORIGINAL PREVIOUS EXISTING PROPOSAL PROPOSED BUDGET ITEM AUTHORIZATION REVISIONS AUTHORIZATION REVISIONS AUTHORIZATION Staffing $ 62,000 $ 45,000 $107,000 $ 21,000 $128,000 Equipment 25,000 (100000) 15,000 15,000 supplies 14,000 - (5,000) 9,000 8,000 17,000 Travel 5,000 5,000 5,000 contracts 174,000 (30,0001 144,000 71,000 215,000 TOTALS ze5 0.000 s o 2Es D,00a s10o.o00 Modifications to Biofiltration Demonstration Project October 20, 1993 Page Seven of Seven DEMONSTRATION PROJECT FUNDING PROPOSED PROPOSED SOURCE EXISTING REVISION FUNDING SCAQM $125,000 $125,000 WERP 30,000 $ 30,000 SCE 50,000 50,000 Subtotal Outside $205,000 $205,000 Funding CSDOC 75,000 100,000 175,000 TOTAL 285 0.000 105 0.000 38S 0.000 2. Authorize staff to procure the additional contract analytical laboratories services to conduct necessary testing pertaining to the Biofiltration Demonstration Project in accordance with established procurement policies. 3. Authorize the General Manager to execute an extension to the specific-term-employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services, for an additional ,three-and-one-half months, for a revised total of fifteen-and-one-half months, increasing the authorized maximum from $45,000 to $58,000. EMT:dk Ref#340254.rp RE: AGENDA ITEM NOS. 12 & 13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS a d ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA September 15, 1993 1O Ews AVENUE WUWAIN VP .GUFOFINN82)Ee.91E] STAFF REPORT A1<lerE2n11 DISTRICTS' ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SOURCE CONTROL FEES, ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES, AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES DISTRICTS' ORDINANCE.ESTABLISHING CHARGES FOR USE OF DISTRICTS' FACILITIES BY INDUSTRIAL USERS AND WASTEHAULERS 1.0 SUMMARY A recent evaluation of the various Source Control fees and charges has shown that in a number of cases, revisions at this time are appropriate to reflect the actual cost of providing services for which the fees are levied. In April 1993, the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committee recommended that the fees be adjusted so that costs can be recovered from the applicable users. Accordingly, last May, the Boards of Directors authorized staff and General Counsel to draft an amendment to the Districts' Ordinance Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees, and Miscellaneous Charges. The Districts' General Counsel has reviewed the proposed fees and determined that it would also be advisable to remove the wastehauler charge for use from the Fee Ordinance and place it in a new User Charge Ordinance, which would also incorporate the applicable industrial charges for use previously adopted by the Districts Boards of Directors. Districts' staff and General Counsel are therefore recommending that the amendments to the Ordinance Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Fees, and Miscellaneous Charges (Fee Ordinance), and that the Ordinance Establishing Charges for Use of Districts' Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehuaulers (User Charge Ordinance) be adopted as proposed herein. The fees and charges established by the Fee Ordinance and User Charge Ordinance pursuant to the February 7, 1992 Wastewater Discharge Regulations (WDR Ordinance) are intended to adjust fees to recover the costs of administering the Districts' Source Control Program, and the costs of operation and maintenance of the Districts' sewerage system as they apply to wastehaulers. These include fees for wastewater discharge permits, fees for the collection and processing of water consumption data and tax data, fees for sampling non-compliant dischargers, and fees for the treatment and disposal of industrial wastes and trucked wastes. Although the User Charge Ordinance incorporates the user charges for recovering the costs of treating and disposing of l:l..weLLAFt RDNC.AF Fee Ordinance Staff Report N Page 1 s the wastewater from industrial dischargers, it does not increase said charges that were last adjusted in 1991. This report provides background information on the proposed changes to the existing fees. 2.0 BACKGROUND The Districts' Source Control Division periodically reviews fees and charges established in the Fee Ordinance as they relate to costs associated with the collection and treatment of wastes, and the administration of the Districts' Source Control Program. Based on this review, the actual costs for the following fees and charges have changed in accordance with changes in sewerage system and administrative costs: ■ Fees for the issuance of Class I and Class II Wastewater Discharge Permits; ■ Wastehauler charge for use; and ■ Non-compliance sampling fees and analytical charges. In addition, to ensure that the full costs of the wastehauler program are recovered, two new fees are being considered for incorporation into the Districts' fee structure: ■ Charges for pre-arranged discharges to the Wastehauler Station after regular operating hours; and ■ Charges for emergency discharges to the Wastehauler Station after regular operating hours. These changes are summarized in Table I, and are discussed in more detail in the subsequent sections of this report and its attachments. 2.1 FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE At the April 1993 meeting of the Districts' Fiscal Policy Committee, the Committee reviewed a staff report regarding the proposed fee revisions. The Committee recommended that the Directors adjust the fees according to the estimated cost increases as presented in the April 1993 staff report, and as presented herein, so that the costs would be directly recovered from the applicable users. The report of the Fiscal Policy Committee was approved by the Executive Committee in April, and by the Boards of Directors at their May 12, 1993-meeting. J1..weunxweeomxcn Fee Ordinance Stan'Report •Page 2 3.0 PERMIT FEES Permit fees are intended to recover the administrative costs of issuing wastewater discharge permits. These costs include processing and review of permit applications, facility inspections to verify manufacturing and pretreatment information provided in permit applications, producing and transmitting the permit, and maintenance of the permit data management system. Pursuant to revisions to the Federal pretreatment regulations', permits for Class I industrial users must contain statements of duration and non-transferability, effluent limits for all standards, self-monitoring, sampling, reporting, record keeping and notification requirements, and statements of applicable civil and criminal penalties for discharge violations. In accordance with these requirements, the Districts have revised the permit application and permit format for all Class I Users, which has increased the administrative costs for issuance of permits. Revisions have also been made to Class II permits. To recover these costs, the Districts are proposing that the Class I permit fee be increased from $250/year to $335/year, and that the Class II permit fee be increased from $33/year to $70/year. The Class I and II permit fees have not been revised since 1989. Additional information on how the fees were derived is shown in Attachment 1. 3.1 COMPARISON TO PERMIT FEES LEVIED BY OTHER WASTEWATER AGENCIES A telephone survey of eight California wastewater treatment agencies revealed that of the six agencies who collect fees for industrial discharge permits, their fees for permit classifications equivalent to our Class I designation are generally higher'. These yearly fees range from $330 to $2,400. Some of the agencies also include the costs of collecting routine samples' from industrial facilities in their permit fees, with permit fees ranging from $1,000 to $2,900 per year. 4.0 WASTEHAULER PROGRAM The Districts operate a Wastehauler Station at Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley for the disposal of non-hazardous liquid wastes received by truck. Materials accepted include biodegradable wastes from non-industrial sources such as septic tanks, cesspools, chemical toilets, and grease traps. Non- hazardous industrial liquid waste is accepted only on a case-by-case basis pending certification that the waste is non-hazardous and meets the Districts' industrial discharge standards. ' These permit requirements were mandated by the August 1990 amendments to the General Pretreatment regulations (= 40 Code of Federal Regulations 403.8). ' The two agencies contacted who do not collect permit fees are the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County and the City/County of San Francisco. These agencies collect all pretreatment administration costs, including permit issuance costs, through user charges. ' This sampling does not include enforcement-related sampling. n�..w�.onwe�wxcxn Fee Ordinance Staff'Report a Page 3 Each wastehauler is issued a Districts' permit and is given a Districts' numbered registration decal for trucks which have been inspected and registered with the Orange County Health Care Agency. Currently the Districts have issued 60 permits to wastehaulers for the disposal of non-industrial waste. Decals have been issued to 140-150 trucks operated by the wastehaulers (the number varies as waste hauling companies add or retire trucks from their fleet). To recover costs for activities relating to the administration of the program and treatment of waste discharges, the Districts charge wastehaulers disposal fees (wastehauler charge for use), permit fees and decal fees. 4.1 WASTEHAULER CHARGE FOR USE The current Fee Ordinance includes a disposal charge of$0.02 per gallon of truck capacity for loads originating within the Districts' service area and $0.04 per gallon for out-of-Districts loads. The out-of-Districts charge has heretofore been arbitrarily set at double the in-Districts charge. The charge is based on the maximum capacity of the truck because it is not feasible to measure the actual volume in each truck. The trucks range in size from 300 gallons to 5,000 gallons. The Districts are proposing that the wastehauler charge for use be set at $0.035/gallon for wastes originating within Orange County, and at $0.11/ gallon for wastes originating outside of Orange County. These changes reflect the costs of treating wastes, administering a manifest program for hauled wastes, and recovering capital costs for non-sewered wastes as discussed below. In accordance with the recommendation from Districts' General Counsel, this charge will now be included in the new User Charge Ordinance. 4.1.1 Treatment Costs A review of the charge for treating and disposing of septage and other hauled wastes as shown in a 1993 report prepared by James M. Montgomery, Inc entitled County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Cost Allocation Study, revealed that the present charge for use of$0.02 per gallon should be revised to $0.03' per gallon based on the volume and strength of wastes treated, and the Districts' annual operations and maintenance, and capital cost allocations. 4.1.2 Manifest Costs - In accordance with Section 306.2.B of the WDR Ordinance, wastehaulers must submit a waste manifest for each source of waste to be discharged at the Wastehauler Station. The program, which was implemented in April 1993, is intended to track discharges and enforce permit conditions. Similar programs have been implemented by other local wastewater agencies, and have been effective in tracking waste sources, and averting the discharge of hazardous wastes and undesirable wastes. ' For comparison purposes, the cost of treating domestic wastewater is $0.0007 per gallon; however, septage is typically 30 to 60 times greater in strength than domestic sewage. i:...weu.oaonuNe ne Fee Ordinance Staff Report • Page 4 As part of the manifest program, each truck coming into the Wastehauler Station provides a completed manifest form prior to entrance. The manifest is examined to ensure that it is complete and legible, and that the waste loads are acceptable for discharge. If any discrepancies are noted, the driver is interviewed, and access is denied until proper documentation is produced. Manifests are verified on a random basis by confirmation with the generator of the wastes. This is done by telephone or by inspecting the generator's facility. Based on the estimated number of manifests to be processed each year and the average yearly discharge of wastes at the Wastehauler Station, the cost of administering the manifest program is $0.005 (ncc) per gallon. Additional information on how the charge was derived is shown in Attachment 2. 4.1.3 Capital Recovery Charges Capital funding by users in the Districts' service area is provided in part through annexation and connection fees. For waste brought to the Wastehauler Station from outside of the Districts' service area, a portion of these capital recovery costs are captured through the existing $0.04/gallon charge. A review of the avoided costs has shown that wastes originating outside of the service area, which are discharged at the Wastehauler Station, should be assessed a capital recovery charge of $0.075/gallon. This charge assumes that capital costs for an out-of-District single family home with a septic tank should be equivalent to the capital costs for a single family home connected to the Districts' sewerage system. Thus the charge is based on an equivalent annexation fee component and a connection fee component. To accommodate the administration of the charge, staff is recommending that it be applied to all out-of-County sources. Additional information on how the charge was derived is shown in Attachment 3. It should be noted that effective February 1, 1994, the Districts will accept grease at the Wastehauler Station only from sources located in the three counties that make up the Santa Ana Watershed; namely, Orange County, Riverside County, and San Bernardino County. The need to restrict the acceptance of grease from areas outside of the Santa Ana Watershed counties is an outcome of changes in grease disposal practices from around the state which have resulted in the transfer of these materials to our Wastehauler Station, and our concerns pertaining to the impact of these wastes on Districts' operations such as odors, equipment malfunction and lost digester capacity. Staff believes that the long-term solution to grease disposal can best be achieved by promoting pollution prevention for grease generators which will facilitate the recycling of grease and will reduce the amount of grease waste that requires disposal. Staff also believes that any long-term solution must rely on the appropriate entities throughout California addressing the issues in their respective watersheds. 4.2 WASTEHAULER STATION COSTS The Wastehauler Station's present hours of operation are Monday through Friday, 5:30 AM to 5:30 PM. To meet special and emergency discharge conditions, the Districts have developed procedures n�..wmiaa�aaueae Fee Ordinance Staff Report a Page 5 that allow wastchaulers to discharge after regular operating hours; however, to ensure that hazardous ' wastes are not discharged during these times, it is necessary to call in staff to sample, review manifests and identify waste loads. To recover the costs of operating and manning the Wastehauler Station at times other than the designated operating hours, two new charges are being proposed as shown below: ■ An after-hours charge of$85 per event for pre-arranged discharges, such as the disposal of chemical toilet wastes during festivals and sporting events; and ■ An after-hours charge of$100 per event for emergency discharges, such as septic tank back-ups or restaurant grease trap overflows. Additional information on how the fees were derived is shown in Attachments 4 and 5. The impact of these fees may be partially offset by the use of a part-time attendant at the Wastehauler Station to provide for extended hours of operation. A position for a part-time attendant was authorized in the 1993-94 fiscal year budget. The part-time attendant will allow for the Wastehauler Station to be open for some weekend hours which will accommodate the disposal of wastes from special events, which typically occur on weekends, or from emergencies, and hence the extra charges would not be applied. 5.0 NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES 5.1 VIOLATION PROCESSING AND SAMPLING COSTS Noncompliance sampling fees have been established in the Fee Ordinance for the administrative, field, and analytical costs of re-sampling an industry found to be in violation of its discharge requirements based on sampling conducted by the Districts or by the industry. The existing fees are $200.00 per event for a minor violation' and $455.00 per event for a major violation' plus laboratory costs. The review of the administrative and sampling costs pertaining to these fees has revealed that adjustments are needed to reflect Districts' costs in processing these violations. The proposed fees are $225.00 per event for a minor violation and $500.00 per event for a major violation. Additional information on how the fees were derived is shown in Attachment 6. ' A minor violation is any discharge that exceeds a permit limit by less than 20%; a pH discharge between 5.0 and 6.0; or a pH discharge greater than 12.0. ' A major violation is any discharge which exceeds a permit limit by more than 20%; or a pH discharge less than 5.0. Ih..W R,t OMNC" Fee Ordinance Staff Report • Page 6 5.2 ANALYTICAL COSTS In conjunction with the non-compliance sampling fees, analytical costs have been established in the Fee Ordinance. The review of the Districts' analytical costs revealed that due to changes in procedures and equipment, there have been associated changes in analytical costs for 23 previously identified constituents. In addition, there are charges for 16 new constituents not previously listed. These have been added to account for new regulations which would limit their discharge. The proposed charges are itemized in Table II with additional information on how they were derived provided in Attachment 6. 6.0 NOTIFICATION TO INDUSTRY OF ORDINANCE REVISIONS AND COMMENTS RECEIVED 6.1 INDUSTRIAL AD HOC COMMITTEE To facilitate input from the regulated community, revisions to ordinances are evaluated in collaboration with an Industrial Ad Hoc Committee. This Committee is made up of representatives from the Districts' industrial community who are permitted dischargers, and who provide a forum for reviewing Districts' source control policies and procedures. The Ad Hoc Committee recently formed a sub-committee to review the proposed fee revisions. On April 20, 1993, the Districts held a meeting with the sub-committee and they concurred with the need to adjust the fees as proposed. Subsequently, the Districts held an additional meeting on June 24, 1993 with the full Ad Hoc Committee who also concurred with the need to adjust the fees. 6.2 PUBLIC WORKSHOP On June 29, 1993, notices were sent to approximately 1,000 permit holders and interested parties about the proposed fee revisions, and the scheduling of a public workshop on July 15, 1993. The purpose of the workshop was to answer questions about the revisions, and to solicit oral and written comments. A deadline of August 1, 1993 was established for submittal of comments. As of the August 1st deadline,the only comments received were the oral comments presented at the workshop, and two letters. The comments received and the responses provided are presented in Attachment 7. m..wmioa�aoxeav Fee Ordinance Staff Report a Page 7 7.0 SCHEDULE FOR ADOPTION OF FEE ORDINANCE The schedule for adoption of the revised Fee Ordinance is presented below. Action Item Coamletion Date' ■ Executive Committee considers the September 22, proposed amendments to the Fee 1993 Ordinance, and the User Charge Ordinance • Consideration and First Reading of Fee October 13, 1993 Ordinance and User Charge Ordinance by the Boards of Directors • Public hearing and consideration of November 10, adoption of Fee Ordinance and User 1993 Charge Ordinance by Board of Directors • Effective date of Fee Ordinance and User January 1, 1994 Charge Ordinance 8.0 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Boards of Directors approve the adoption of both the Districts' Ordinance Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees, and Miscellaneous Charges; and the Districts' Ordinance Establishing Charges for Use of Districts' Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers. rn..vaorae mwpexv Fm Ordio Staff Report • Page 8 TABLE I SOURCE CONTROL FEES, ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES FEE ORDINANCE Currem. Charge Proposed Charge Permit Fees: A. Class I Permit $250.00/yr $335.00/yr B. Class II Permit $33.33/yr $70.00/yr C. Class III Permit $75.00/3 yr No Change D. Special Purpose Discharge $250.00/yr No Change Permit E. Wastehauler Discharge $75.00/yr No Change Permit F. Transportable Treatment Unit $250.00/yr No Change Wastehauler Fees: G. Permit Decal Initial Issue $25.00 No Change H. Permit Decal Replacement $50.00 No Change I. Entry Card Initial Issue $50.00 No Change I. Entry Card Replacement $100.00 No Change K. After Hours Discharge - — $85.00/event Prearranged L. After Hours Discharge - — $100.00/event Emergency Administrative/Processing Fees: M. Districts Collection of Tax $100.00/permit No Change Data N. Districts Collection of Water $100.00/permit No Change Consumption Data O. Appeal Hearing Filing Fee $400.00 No Change USER CHARGE ORDINANCE Current Charge gr posed Charge A. Charge for Use - Waste Originating $0.02/gallon of $0.035/gallon of Outside Orange County truck capacity truck capacity B. Charge for Use - Waste Originating $0.04/gallon of $0.1I/gallon of Outside Orange County truck capacity truck capacity TABLE 11 NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES FEE ORDINANCE Current Charne Promosed Charee Cost of Processing and Sampling a $200.00%vent $225.00/event Minor Violation Cost of Processing and Sampling a $455.00%vent $500.00/event Major Violation - Costs for Analyses: 1. Heavy Metals - this one $16.00 $19.00 price includes analysis for all the following: Cadmium Lead Chromium Silver Copper Zinc Nickel 2. Aluminum - $19.00 3. Antimony - $19.00 4. Arsenic $16.00 $19.00 5. Gold - $19.00 6. Mercury $130.00 $145.00 7. Molybdenum - $19.00 8. Palladium - $19.00 9. Platinum - $19.00 10. Selenium - $19.00 11. Thallium - $19.00 12. Method 601/602 $94.00 $152.00 13. Method 604 $153.00 $223.00 14. Method 606 $180.00 $254.00 15. Method 608 $193.00 $254.00 16. Method 610 - $37.00 17. Method 612 - $200.00 18. Method 624 $225.00 $219.00 19. Method 625 $375.00 $445.00 20. Ammonia Analysis as Nitrogen $24.00 $26.00 21. Biochemical Oxygen Demand $24.00 $29.00 (BOD) TABLE II NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES FEE ORDINANCE Current Charge Proposed Charge 22. BOD and Suspended Solids $30.00 $36.00 Analysis 23. Chemical Oxygen Demand $12.00 $14.00 24. Conductivity $6.00 $7.00 25. Cyanide (Amenable) $48.00 $67.00 26. Cyanide (Total) $30.00 $42.00 27. Dissolved Mineral Solids $12.00 $13.00 28. Fluoride --- $35.00 29. Gamma Radiation --- $115.00 Determination 30. Gross Alpha and Beta --- $50.00 Determination 31. Tritium Determination --- $50.00 32. Grease and Oil (Hexane $73.00 $79.00 Soluble Matter) 33. Grease and Oil (Mineral $73.00 $79.00 Partition) 34. Total Organic Nitrogen $24.00 $26.00 35. pH $7.00 $7.00 36. Phenol $73.00 1 37. Suspended Solids (Total) $6.00 $7.00 38. Suspended Solids (Total and $12.00 $14.00 Volatile) 39. Total Dissolved Solids --- $9.00 40. Total Sulfides --- $20.00 This charge is not necessary since the analysis for phenol is part of Method 604. ATTACEMENT 1 SUMMARY OF AVERAGE YEARLY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH ISSUANCE OF CLASS 1 AND CLASS O PERMITS September Im DIVISION EMPLOYEE HOURS TASKS REQUIRED TO ISSUE PERMIT AVERAGE D19MCTS DISTRICT COSTS PERMIT FEE TITLE HOURLY RATE COST +60% OVERHEAD 440 SOURCE ENGINEER 0.25 PREPARE APPLICATION MAILI O 26.12 6.53 10.45 CONTROL SOURCE ENGINEER 8.00 PROCESS AND REVIEW APPLICATION AND FLOW 26.12 208.96 334.34 CONTROL DIAGRAMS SOURCE ENGINEER 2.E INSPECTION OF FACILITY FOR CATEGORY 26.12 52.24 93.58 CONTROL DETERMINATION AND WET PROCESSES SOURCE CLERICAL 0.50 APPLICATION MARL NO 13.67 6.84 10.94 CONTROL SOURCE CLERICAL 2.00 ISSUE PERMIT,CREATE FITS,MAKE COPIES 13.67 27.34 43.74 CONTROL SOURCE CLERICAL 1.32 SELF-MONITORING DATA COMPUTER INPUT- 16 13.67 18.04 28.96 CONTROL SAMPLES SOURCE CLERICAL 2.00 SELF-MONITORING REMINDER LETTERS,PHONE 13.67 27.34 43.74 CONTROL CALLS ACCOUNTING CLERICAL 2.0 - LEDGERS,POSTING,TRACKING OF PAYMENTS, 17.72 35.44 56.70 COLLECTIONS COST FOR CLASS I PERMIT O YEARS) 67235 670.00 ANNUAL COST 335.00 Attachment I • Page 1 ATTACEAHM 1 SUAIIWARY OF AVERAGE YEARLY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH ISSUANCE OF CLASS I AND CLASS U PERbUTS Sgdanbw 1993 DIVISION EMPLOYEE HOURS TASKS REQUIRED TO ISSUE PERMIT AVERAGE DISTRICTS DISTRICT COSTS PERMIT FEE TITLE HOURLY DATE COST +04% OVERHEAD CLASS El SOURCE ENGINEER 0.12 PREPARE APPLICATION MAILING 26.12 3.13 5.01 CONTROL SOURCE ENGINEER 0.25 PROCESS AND REVIEW APPLICATION AND PLOW 26.12 6.53 10.45 CONTROL DIAGRAMS SOURCE CLERICAL 0.25 APPLICATION MAILING 13.67 3.42 5.47 CONTROL SOURCE CLERICAL 0.75 ISSUE PERMIT,CREATE EI Es,MARE COPIES 13.67 10.25 16.40 CONTROL SOURCE CLERICAL IRO SELF-MONITORiG DATA COMPUTER INPUT- 12 13.67 13.67 21.87 CONTROL SAMPLES SOURCE CLERICAL 3.W SELF-MONITORING REMINDER LOITERS,PHONE 13.67 41.01 65.62 CONTROL CALLS ACCOUNTING CLERICAL 3.00 LEDGERS,POSTING,TRACKING OF PAYMENTS, 17.T2 53.16 95.06 COLLECTIONS COSTS FOR CLASS H PERMIT l3 YEARS) 2"m 210.00 ANNUAL COST 70.00 Attachment 1 • Page 2 ATTACEMENT 2 SUMMARY OF COSTS TO ADNONJISTER AND PROCESS WAS ERAULER MANIFESTS Seplt3Eb3f 1M DIVISION EMPLOYEE HOURS TASK NEEDED TO ADMINISTER AND PROCESS AVERAGE DISTRICT DISTRICTS COST COST USED IN FEE TITLE MANIFESTS HOURLY S +60% ORDINANCE RATE COST OVERHEAD SOURCE ASSISTANT 0.15 • RECEIVE MANIFEST AT STATION,REVIEW 11.45 1.72 2.75 CONTROL MANIFEST,RECORD/LOG-IN VERBAL VERIFICATION WITH WASL'EHAUIER TEST(pill VERIFICATION WITH CUSTOMER SOURCE CLERICAL 0.10 • INPUT FIELD DATA(VOLUME,IN-COUNTS 11.69 1.17 1.97 CONTROL OR OUT-0F�COUNTY,DECAL,ETC.) R FILE TOTAL 4.62 :;. AlIDIT10NALMAN1l+ES'1'PROGRAM CALCULATIONS AVERAGE NUMBER OF TRUCKED LOADS PPR MONTH 950' AVERAGE NUMBER OF TRUCKED LOADS PER YEAR 11,400 AVERAGE NUMBER OF MANIFESTS PER LOAD V COST TO ADMINISTER MANIFEST(SEE TOP PORTION OF THIS ATTACHMENT). $4.62/MANIFEST COST PER LOAD AT 2 PICK-UPSITRUCK $9.24 TOTAL COST PER YEAR 01,400 LOADS a$9.24) $105.336 COST PER GALLON(S105a36120 MGN) $0.0053($0.005) no arecage number was based av a 1991-92 survey. The averageunmber of lands was baud on the following survey rmdbW: 31%of the loads contain 3 to 4 pirlmpe143%office loads contain 2 pickups;and 26%of the loads contain Ito 2 pickups. Tie 20 MGY is the average annual volume of all wastebauler too&d¢hasged at the Wavtehanles Station. ATTACEMENNT 3 CAPITAL RECOVERY CHARGE FOR WASTES ORIGINATING FROM OUT OF THE SERVICE AREA 1993 CAPITAL CHARGE FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOME CONNECTED TO THE SEWER ANNEXATION FEE' 317DD.00 CONNECTION FEE Sil50.W TOTAL FEES S40%(X) CAPITAL.RECOVERY CHARGE FOIL A SINGLE FAMILY HOME NOT CONNECTED TO ME SEWER ANNUAL INTEREST RATE —6.5%s EXPECTED LIFE OF HOME —30 YEARS SEPTIC TANK PUMPINO FREQUENCY —2/YEAR' CAPITAL RECOVERY FACTOR' —0.0371 ANNUAL RECOVERY - 0.0371KS40M-$150.26IYR ($ISD.WN]t) SEPTIC TANK VOLUME -2,000 GALLONS ANNUAL CAPITAL CHARGE _ (3150.00)/(2,000GAL) -S0.0/51GAL ' The avern,aemmetioo fee Ls f50W/acre{this value e.¢mma 7 homes per are. s The avesa emmuel recovery interest lam used by DbukD for limancial analyses. ' Septic trek disposal varies deperdkS on the condition of We sepm,e system. Some sysunus require pumping Tow times a year,some pump ores every 2 in 3 yenss. Far Win molysis,We tort is mnuelised m based on two pumpusg eseole per YemW accomt for We sariabrl'ty hm pumpiop re1es. ' This is We calmdeltd recovery fselor lensed an Avonal lateral Ram of6S%,60 ps,o ems Cap years X 2 septic look gmphtgslyear)undo,We formula and tables in Principles ofEn%imerNR Eronomy,FM Edition, 1970,Tables E7 and ENt. ATTAURWENT4 ADMINLSTRATIVE AND SAMPLING COSTS FOR PRE-ARRANGED WASTEDAUTER DISCHARGE EVENTS' Septt>mbw 1993 DIVISION EMPLOYEE TITLE HOURS TASKS ASSOCIATED WITH WASTEHAULER AVERAGE DISTRICTS DISTRICTS COST USED IN DISCHARGES DURING OFF-HOURS(PRE. HOURLY COST COST+60% FEE ORDINANCE ARRANGED) RATE OVERHEAD SOURCE CONTROL TECHNICIAN 13 R TRAVELTO DISTRICTS (ROUND TRIP) 11.45 17.19 27.49 SOURCE CONTROL TECHNICIAN 0.15 R RECEIVE DISCHARGE 11.45 1.72 2.75 R VISUAL INSPECTION OF LOAD' w PREPARE SAMPLERS AND SAMPLE w PREPARE PAPERWORK(RECORD DISCHARGE, REPORT ON DISCHARGE) SOURCE CONTROL CLERK 020 w ENTER FIELD DATA,FILE 11.69 2.34 3.74 w PREPARE SPECIN.BRIJ NO FOR DISCHARGE ACCOUNTING CLERK 1.00 w LEDGERS,POSTING,TRACKING OF Ism 15.00 N.00 PAYMENTS,COLLECTIONS LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.60 HEAVY METALS ANALYSIS(7 METALS):CLEAN 18.36 14.69 D.50 ANALYST GLASSWARE,SAMPLE PREPARATION,SAMPLE ANALYSIS,HOT PLATE DIGESTION,QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB AND 0.1 HEAVY METALS ANALYSIS V METALS):REVIEW D.03 2.30 3.68 RESEARCH ANALYST DATA,EVALUATEQUALHY ASSURANCE, REPORT RESULTS TOTAL COST $5.16 95.00 ' The e/1er hove rhesRo a for pmert>mged dixhasRs,sorb m We depmel of rhemkal IwTet webs durivp festively and nportm8 eveele;We rhasgc u av a"Per event'bads. ' The cost far redl ari,the mn..V l is imladal iv We waslehaWer chas0e for ass. ATTACHMENT 5 ADM1HNISMATIVE AND SAMPLING COSTS FOR EMERGENCY WASPEHAULER DISCHARGE EVENTS AFTER REGULAR OPERATING HOURS September IM rCONTROL EMPLOYEE TI'ITE HOURS TASKS ASSOCIATED WITH WASIEHAULER AVERAGE DISTRICTS DISTRICTS COST USED IN DISCHARGES DURING OFF-HOURS(NON- HOURLY RATE COST COSF+60% PEE ORDINANCE' PREARRANGED) OVERHEAD LEAD INSPECTOR 1.00 w CALL WASTEHAULER:OBTAIN INFORMATION I7.00 17.00 27.20 ON EMERGENCY • VERIFY INFORMATION WITH SOURCE • NOfMCAnON OF HEALTH DEPARTMENTICONFIRMATION • APPROVAL OF DISCHARGE;ADVISE STATION GUARD,CONTROL CENTER,SCHEDULE STATION ATTENDANT/INSPECTOR TECHNICIAN 0.5 • TRAVEL TO DISTRICTS(ROUND TRIP) 11.45 5.73 9.17 TECHNICIAN 0.15 • RECEIVE DISCHARGE 11.45 1.72 2.75 • VISUAL INSPECTION OF LOAD' • REVIEW EMERGENCY DECLARATION; RECONCILE WITH MANIFEST INFORMATION? • PREPARE SAMPLERS AND SAMPLE w PREPARE PAPERWORK(RECORD DISCHARGE, REPORT ON DISCHARGE) SOURCE SOURCECONTROL 0.25 • REVIEW 22.17 5.54 8.96 CONTROL SUPERVISOR SOURCE CLERK 0.75 • ENTER MELD DATA,FILE 11.69 8.77 14.03 CONTROL • PREPARE SPECIAL BR.I.ING ACCOUNTING CLERK 1.00 • LEDGERS,POSTING,TRACKING OF PAYMENTS, 15.OD 15.00 24.00 COLLECTIONS ' The cart for reviewing the menlfek 4 Iududed In the user charge. ' M esa review Included in Ucer Charge(Fee)Per PH.W truck. Attachment 5 • Page I ATTACEMEN'T 5 AOMINISIRA*VE AND SAMiPMG COSTS FOR EMERGENCY WAsrEMAULER.DISCHARGE EVENTS AFTER REGULAR OPERATING HOURS September 1993 tDEMPLOYEE TITLE HOURS TASKS ASSOCIATED WITH WASIEHAULER AVERAGE DISTRICT'S DISTRICTS COST'USED IN DISCHARGES DURING OFF HOURS(NON- HOURLY RATE COST COST'+60% PEE ORDINANCE PREARRANGED) OVERHEAD LABORATORY 0.80 HEAVY METALS ANALYSIS(]METALS):CLEAN 18.36 14.69 23.60 ANALYST GLASSWARE,SAMPLE PREPARATION,SAMPLE ANALYSIS,QUALITY ASSURANCE,HOT PLATE DIGESTION PRINCIPAL LAB 0.10 HEAVY METALS ANALYSIS(9 METALS):REVIEW 23.03 2.30 3.68 AND RESEARCH DATA,EVALUATE QUALITY ASSURANCE,REPORT ANALYST RESULTS ' TOTAL COST 113.19 100.00 Attachment 5 •Page 2 ATTACEAIENT 6 ADMINISTRATIVE AND SAMPLING COSTS FOR DETERMINATION OF NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES September, 1"3 ° EMPLOYEE TASKS NEEDED TO ACCOMPLISH RESAM PLENG AVERAGE DISTRICTS DISTRICT COSTS COST ACTUALLY DIVISION TITLE HOURS AND ANALYSES - HOURLY COST +60%OVERHEAD USED IN RATE DETERMINATION SOURCE TECHNICIAN 0.5 CLEAN AND PREPARE SAMPLERS 12.09 &N 9.m IOAO CONTROL SOURCE INSPECTOR 4.5 SET SAMPLER AND RETURN TO OFFICE,PREPARE PAPER 18.29 82.31 131.70 132.00 CONTROL WORK SOURCE LEAD 0.5 REVIEW WWAR AND DETERMINE MAMPLINO SCHEDULE 21.86 10.93 17.49 IB.00 CONTROL INSPECTOR SOURCE CLERK 0.25 ENTER LAB DATA,FIELD DATA AND PRINT REPORT,FILING 13.67 3.42 5.47 &W CONTROL SOURCE SUPERVISOR 0.75 WRITE REPORTS,REVIEW FIFE,DISCUSSION ON 26.57 19.93 31.99 32.00 CONTROL VIOLATION ACCOUNTING CLERK 1.0 LEDOERS,POSTING,TRACKING OF PAYMENTS, 17.M 17.T2 28.35 29.m COLLECTIONS TOTAL COST OF PROCESSING AND SAMPLING DUE TO A OAO 0.00 227.00 MINOR VIOLATION SOURCE ENGINEERS 6.75 ADDITIONAL STAFF REPORTS,INSPECTIONS,REPORT 26.12 17611 2B2.10 283.00 CONTROL MNOR WRITING,LETTER,TRAVEL TIME VIOLATION TOTAL COST OF PROCESSING AND SAMPLING DUE TO A 0.00 0.00 S1030 MAJOR VIOLATION NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.5 HEAVY METALS ANALYSIS(7 METALS):CLEAN 18.36 9.18 14.69 ANALYST GLASSWARE,SAMPLE PREPARATION,SAMPLE ANALYSIS, QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.1 HEAVY METALS ANALYSIS(7 METALS):REVIEW DATA, 23.03 2.30 3.68 19.00 AND RESEARCH EVALUATE QUALITY ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.5 ALUMINUM ANALYSIS:CLEAN GLASSWARE,SAMPLE 13.36 9.19 14.69 ANALYST PREPARATION,SAMPLE ANALYSIS,QUALITY ASSURANCE Attachment 6 • Page 1 ATTACEMIE T 6 ADMINISTRATIVE AND SAMPLING COSTS FOR DETERMINATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES SMtmlbw, IM EMPLOYEE TASKS NEEDED TO ACCOMPLISH RESAMPLING AVERAGE DISTRICTS DISTRICT COSTS COST ACTUALLY DIVISION 'TITLE HOURS AND ANALYSES HOURLY COST +60%OVERHEAD USED IN RATE DETERMINATION LABORATORY PRBNCIPAL LAB 0.1 ALUMINUM ANALYSIS:REVIEW DATA,EVALUATE QUALITY 23.03 2.30 3.69 19.00 AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.5 ANTIMONY ANALYSIS:CLEAN GLASSWARE,SAMPLE 18.36 9.18 14.69 ANALYST PREPARATION,SAMPLE ANALYSIS,QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAR 0.1 ANTIMONY ANALYSIS:REVIEW DATA,EVALUATE QUALITY M.03 2,30 3.68 19.00 AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.5 ARSENIC ANALYSIS:CLEAN GLASSWARE,SAMPLE 18.36 9AS 14.69 ANALYST PREPARATION,SAMPLE ANALYSIS,QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.1 ARSENIC ANALYSIS:REVIEW DATA,EVALUATE QUALITY 23.03 2.30 3.69 19.00 AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.5 GOLD ANALYSIS:CLEAN GLASSWARE,SAMPLE 19.36 9.1E 14.69 ANALYST PREPARATION,SAMPLE ANALYSIS,QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.1 GOLD ANALYSIS:REVIEW DATA,EVALUATE QUALITY 23.03 2.30 3.68 19.00 AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 4.9 MERCURY ANALYSIS:CLEAN GLASSWARE,SAMPLE 19.36 88.13 141.01 ANALYST PREPARATION,SAMPLE ANALYSIS,QUALITY ASSURANCE - LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.1 MERCURY ANALYSIS:REVIEW DATA,EVALUATE QUALITY 23.03 2.30 3.68 145.W AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.5 MOLYBDENUM ANALYSIS:CLEAN GLASSWARE,SAMPLE 19.36 9.18 IC0 ANALYST PREPARATION,SAMPLE ANALYSIS,QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.1 MOLYBDENUM ANALYSIS:REVIEW DATA,EVALUATE 23.03 2.30 3.68 19.00 AND RESEARCH QUALITY ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYSE LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.5 1 PALLADIUM ANALYSIS:CLEAN GLASSWARE,SAMPLE 18.36 9.19 14.69 ANALYST PREPARATION,SAMPLE ANALYSIS,QUALITY ASSURANCE Attachment 6 • Page 2 ATTACffiNEN'T 6 AD ENMRATME AND SAMPLING COSTS FOR DETERhMATION OF NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES sqI®b. i EMPLOYEE TAM NEEDED TO ACCOMPLISH RESAMPLD4G AVERAGE DISTRICTS DISTRICT COSTS COST ACTUALLY DIVISION TITLE HOURS AND ANALYSES HOURLY COST +60%OVERHEAD US®IN RATE DETERMINATION LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.1 PALLADIUM ANALYSIS:REVIEW DATA,EVALUATE 23.03 2.30 3.N 19.00 AND RESEARCH QUALITY ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.5 PLATINUM ANALYSIS:CLEAN GLASSWARE,SAMPLE 18.36 9.19 14.69 ANALYST PREPARATION,SAMPLE ANALYSIS,QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.1 PLATINUM ANALYSIS:REVIEW DATA,EVALUATE QUALITY 23.03 2.30 3.68 19.00 AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 05 SELENIUM ANALYSIS:CLEAN GLASSWARE,SAMPLE 18.36 9.18 14.69 ANALYST PREPARATION,SAMPLE ANALYSIS,QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.1 SELENIUM ANALYSIS:REVIEW DATA,EVALUATE QUALITY 23.03 2.30 3.68 19.00 AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.5 THALLIUM ANALYSIS:CLEAN GLASS WARE,SAMPLE 19.36 9.19 14.69 ANALYST PREPARATION,SAMPLE ANALYSIS,QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 0.1 THALLIUM ANALYSIS:REVIEW DATA,EVALUATE QUALITY 23.03 2.30 3.69 19.00 AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY SR. 4.0 NI/602 ANALYSIS:CLEAN GLASSWARE,MARE DILUTIONS, 19.09 T2.32 115.71 LABORATORY ANALYZE SAMPLE,QUALITY ASSURANCE ANALYST LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 1.0 601/6IH ANALYSIS:REVIEW DATA,EVALUATE QUALITY 22.74 22.74 36.39 152.W AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 6.0 604 ANALYSIS:CLEAN OLASSWARE,PREPARE 19.35 116.10 195.76 ANALYST/SR. EXTRACTIONS,CONCENTRATE,MARE DILUTIONS, LABORATORY ANALYZE SAMPLE,QUALITY ASSURANCE ANALYST LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 1.0 604 ANALYSIS:REVIEW DATA,EVALUATE QUALITY 22.74 22.74 36.38 223.00 AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYST Attachment 6 • Page 3 ATTACEMENT6 ADMINISTRATIVE AND SAMPLING COSTS FOR DETERMINATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES EMPLOYEE TASKS NEEDED TO ACCOMPLISH RESAMPLING AVERAGE DISTRICTS DISTRICT COSTS COST ACTUALLY DIVISION 71TLE HOURS AND ANALYSES HOURLY COST +60%OVERHEAD USED RATE DETERMINATION LABORATORY LABORATORY 7.0 606 ANALYSIS:CLEAN GLASSWARE,PREPARE 19.35 135.45 216.E ANALYST/SR. EXTRACTIONS,CONCENTRATE,MAKE DILUTIONS, LABORATORY ANALYZE SAMPLE,QUALITY ASSURANCE ANALYST LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAR 1.0 606 ANALYSIS:REVIEW DATA,EVALUATE QUALITY 22.74 M.74 36.39 254.00 AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 7.0 606 ANALYSIS:CLEAN GLASSWARE,PREPARE 19.35 135.45 216.72 ANALYST/SR. EXTRACTIONS,CONCENTRATE,MAKE DILUTIONS, LABORATORY ANALYZE SAMPLE,QUALM ASSURANCE ANALYST LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 1.0 WS ANALYSIS:REVIEW DATA,EVALUATE QUALITY 22.74 M.74 36.38 254.00 AND RESEARCH ASSURANCE,REPORT RESULTS ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 1.0 610 ANALYSIS: 22.74 22.74 36.39 37.W ANALYST/SR. LABORATORY ANALYST LABORATORY OUTSIDE N/A 612 ANALYSIS:CLEAN GLASSWARE.PREPARE 0.00 0.00 • 200.00 LABORATORY EXTRACTIONS,CONCENTRATE,MAKE DMUHONS, ANALYZE SAMPLE,QUALITY ASSURANCE LABORATORY PRINCIPAL LAB 6.0 624 ANALYSIS: M.74 136.44 218.30 219.00 AND RESEARCH ANALYST LABORATORY OUTSIDE N/A 625 ANALYSIS: 0.00 0.00 445.m LABORATORY LABORATORY LABORATORY 1.0 AMMONIA ANALYSIS AS NITROGEN: 16.27 16.27 26.03 26.W ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 1.0 BIOCHEMICAL DEMAND MOD)DETERMINATION: 17.57 17.57 28.11 2900 ANALYST Attachment 6 • Page 4 AITACEMIENT 6 ADMINISTRATIVE AND SAMPLING COSTS FOR DETERMINATION OF NON-COMPIdANCE SAMPLING FEES Sepbmber, 1993 EMPLOYEE TASKS NEEDED TO ACCOMPLISH RESAMPU NG AVERAGE DISTRICTS DISTRICT COSTS COST ACTUALLY DIVISION TITLE HOURS AND ANALYSES HOURLY COST + 60%OVERHEAD USED IN RATE DETERMINATION LABORATORY LABORATORY 1.25 SOD AND SUSPENDED SOLIDS DETERMINATION: 17.86 22.33 35.73 36A0 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.5 CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND(COD)DETERMINATION: 17.57 8.79 14.06 14.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.25 CONDUCITVITY DETERMWA77ON: 17.57 4.39 7R2 7.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 2.0 CYANIDE(AMENABLE)DETERMINATION: 20.68 41.36 66.18 67.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY IM CYANIDE(TOTAL)DETERMINATION: 20.68 25.95 41.36 42.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY OS DISSOLVED MINERAL SOLIDS DMWI41NATION: 16.27 8.14 13+M 13.00 ANALYST LABORATORY OUTSIDE N/A DISSOLVED SULFIDES DETERMINATION: 0.00 OAO LABORATORY LABORATORY OUTSIDE N/A GAMMA RADIATION DETERMINATION: 0.00 0.00 115.00 LABORATORY LABORATORY OUTSIDE N/A GROSS ALPHA AND BETA DETERMINATION: 0.00 0.00 50.00 LABORATORY LABORATORY OUTSIDE N/A TRITIUM DETERMINATION: 0.00 0.00 WIG LABORATORY LABORATORY LABORATORY 3.0 N ANE SOLUBLE MATTER(GREASE AND OIL)ANALYSIS: 16.27 48.81 78.10 79.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 3.0 GREASE AND OIL-MINERAL PARTITION: 1627 48.81 78.10 79.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 1.0 NITROGEN OUE.DAHL OR TOTAL ORGANIC)ANALYSIS: 1627 16.27 26.03 26.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.25 PH DETERMINATION: 17.57 4.39 7.02 7,m ANALYST Attachment 6 • Page 5 ATTACEMENT 6 ADMINISTRATIVE AND SAMPLING COSTS FOR DETERMINATION OF NONCOMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES September, 1993 EMPLOYEE TASKS NEEDED TO ACCOMPLISH RESAMPLING AVERAGE DISTRICTS DISTRICT COSTS COST ACTUALLY DIVISION TITLE HOURS AND ANALYSES HOURLY COST +60%OVERHEAD USED IN RATE DETERMINATION LABORATORY OUTSIDE N/A FLUORIDEANALYSM: OAO 0.00 35.00 LABORATORY LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.25 SUSPENDED SOLIDS(TOTAL ONLY)DETERMINATION: 17.57 4.39 7.02 1.00 ANALYST LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.5 SUSPENDED SOLIDS(TOTAL AND VOLAT" 17.57 8.79 14.06 J2O.W ANALYST DETERMINATION: LABORATORY LABORATORY 0.25 TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS(TDS)DETERMINATION: 20.92 5.21 8.34 ANALYST LABORATORY OUTSIDE N/A TOTAL SULFIDES DETERMINATION: 0.00 0.00 LABORATORY Attachment 6 • Page 6 .� ATTACHMENT 7 PUBLIC CODIMENTS ON THE REVISIONS TO THE FEE ORDINANCE July 15, 1993 Public Workshop On July 15, 1993 at 2:00 P.M., the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(Districts)held a public meedug to solicit oral and written comments prnsi_nino to proposed revisons to the Ordinance Establishing Source Control Fees, Non-Compliance SampWg Fees, and Miscellaneous Charger (Fee Ordinance). Notices for the workshop, which presented the proposed fee revisions, were distributed to all Districts'permit holders on June 29, 1993 (REP#391051.LTR). As discussed in the notice, the proposed revisions affect three types of charges: fees for wastewater discharge permits, fees for the treatment and disposal of tracked wastes, and fees for noncompliant discharges. Revisions are being proposed at this time to reflect the actual cast of providing services for which the fees are levied. There were 18 individuals in attendance at the July 15th workshop: Is three Districts' staff members; Is twelve members of the public representing waslehauling companies; and Is three City of Los Angeles staff members who were present as observers. Oral comments provided by the participants are summarized below; the responses provided by Districts staff are shown in italics. No written comments were submitted at the workshop. 1. One wastehauler indicated that the proposed increase in fees from $0.02/gallon to$0.035/gallon was a large jump, and that his customers, who will earl up paying for the increase, will net be happy. The derivation of the charge to recover costs was reviewed and discussed with the attendees. 2. One wastehauler noted that al times, he experiences long delays in disposing of his loads at the wasvehauler station. Sometimes the delays are as much as one how. He stated that we need to provide two disposal connections. We advised him that there are two connections available to facilitate peak operational periods, but that one has been out of service due to blockage mused by a wastehauler. We noted that we would fad out when the connection would reopen. 3. One wastehauler expressed concerns about the limited hours of operation and the after-hours charge for bringing in chemical toilet wastes from special events on weekends. He indicated that the magnitude of the after hours charge would put him out of business. We discussed the need for attendance at the wastehauler station at any ame it is being used, and stated that we would take his concerns ceder consideration. We also indicated that the hours of operation may be emended since a pantion for a pan-time attendant had been authorized m the 1993-94 fucal year budget. This individual was advised that the availability of the pan-time attends r would allow for the Wastehauler Station to be open for some weekend hours which would accommodate the discharge of special event loads which are typically generated on weete ds, and hence the extra charge woud not be applied. The attendant would also be available for early morning hours which would help with reducing service delays (see No. 2 abase). 4. One waswhauler recommended that we sample every load even if it raises fees. He indicated there is Attachment 7 • Page 1 no one in the country that charges as little as $0.11/gallon. We advised him that we were planning on re- ahadng the sampling program m the end of 1993, and would take his comments two consideration. In addition, the fees of many local wastemw agencies are still in h'ne with our .proposed fees. 5. Several wastehaulers expressed concerns about the estimates of the volumes being manifested. In some cases the gauges on truck tanks are inaccurate; in otters, the customer has no accurate figure for the tank volume being pumped. The wmtehauler indicated that they have been told they will be turned away in future if the manifested volumes are not more accurate. We advised these individuals that our concerns were raised in obvious cases where we had a fall truck with too few manifests to match the vahime, or a truck whose payload was not full, yet the manifests indicate that it should be full. We noted that in there cases, we are likely to suspect ndsrepresenamon of the materials to be discharged. We indicated flit we would take their concerns into consideration, but emphasized the consequences of misrepresentation of the(Dads and sources. Written, comments Written comments pertaining to the proposed revisions were received from two individuals. These comments were generally opposed many type of fee imams because of the poor ecoumay. The letters and Districts' responses are attached. Attachment 7 a Page 2 ----- 265 BRIGGS AVENUE -COSTA MESA. CALIFORNIA 92825-4555-TEL(7143 546-4460- FAX(714)555-6955 July 15, 1993 Margaret H. Nellor Source Control Manager Orange County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Dear Ms. Nellor: I would like to respond to your letter dated June 29, 1993 which outlined the proposed increases to the fee ordinance. CIMCO has been in business for 34 years and for that entire period, we have been at the same location in Orange County. We employ over 500 workers at our Costa Mesa facility. We feel that we have become an active part of the community. We now, however, are continually being confronted with obstacles making it more difficult to continue doing business here. It is becoming more and more attractive for us to move our operations outside the state of California to avoid the increasing cost of doing business here. I know that CIMCO is not the only company that shares this concern. Your proposal suggests an increase in permit fees. Class I shows a 34% increase and Class II shows a 112% increase. I ask you that you please reconsider these increases particularly during these tough economic times. I truly appreciate any assistance you can give us in resolving this problem. sincerely, CIMCO, INC. 7 A Rod Henderson Vice President, Human Resources RH:mj RlE�IJ Trryw.10RL5TGCTA�WEMS.M m0L6fwnL.CG.uNEPCUL 1t�vE6C<l ncctYST4^6 ",r.r,°"° COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS o'r ♦�� " �t' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 w 10844 ELLIS,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ♦�+GECW� (714)962-2411 July 22, 1993 REF#391156.LTR Rod Henderson Cimco, Inc. 265 Briggs Avenue - Costa Mesa, CA 92626-4555 Permit No: 7-2-122 Subject: Revisions to Ordinance Establishing Administrative Fees The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County(Districts) have reviewed your July 15, 1993 letter which was sent in response to the Districts' June 29, 1993 notice regarding proposed revisions to the Districts' Ordinance Establishing Source Control Fees, Achninis"five Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees, and Miscellaneous Charger (Fee Ordinance), and the scheduling of a public workshop for July 15, 1993. As discussed in the June 29th notice, the proposed revisions affect three types of charges: fees for wastewater discharge permits, fees for the treatment and disposal of trucked wastes, and fees for non-compliant discharges. Revisions arc being proposed at this time to reflect the actual cost of providing services for which the fees are levied. In your letter, you stated that your company was continually being confronted with obstacles making it more difficult to do business in California and making it more attractive to move your operations to another state. You also asked the Districts to please reconsider the Class I and 11 Wastewater Discharge Permit fee increases during these tough economic times. Please be advised that we sympathize with the present condition of California businesses and the troubles they are going through because of the economy. In recognition, the Districts have been able to "hold the line on industrial sewer user charges for the last two fiscal years and the present fiscal year in large part by using innovative cogeneration facilities which reduce air emissions and save ratepayers money through the production of our own electricity, and by obtaining a treatment waiver from the Federal government which reduces the costs of treating wastewater and disposing of biosolids. These combined anions ultimately save our ratepayers over $52 million dollars per year. With regard to the impact of the proposed fee revisions on your own business, please be advised that these changes do not impact your annual sewer user charge. The only impact on businesses such as your would be the fee charged for issuing a Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit. The current Class II permit fee is$33.00 per year. This fee was last revised in 1989. The proposed permit fee is$70.00 per year. This represents an average increase of$7.40 per year since the rates were last revised, and reflect the administrative costs for issuance of Class II permits. Additional information about the fee revision can be provided at your request. We hope this information has been responsive to your comments. Should you have any further questions or comments, please fee free to contact this office. Margaret H. Nellor Source Control Manager MHN:JW:Ivw cc James Wybenga CLEAN CITY LAUNDRIES 1217 N.TUSTIN.ORANGE,CA COIN OPERATED LAUNDRY July 10, 1993 J. Wayne Sylvester - County Sanitation Districts of O.C. Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Mr. Sylvester: Enclosed you will find a copy of my letter regarding the proposed revisions to the fees charged. Yours truly, ,as E. Crommett�� Enc. OFFICE:1045 N.MALLARD,ORANGE,CA 92857 714-532J4394 CLEAN CITY LAUNDRIES 1217 N.TUSTIN.ORANGE CA COIN OPERATED LAUNDRY July 10, 1993 Margaret H. Nellor Source Control Manager County Sanitation District of O. C. Joint Administration Office 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley, CA 92728 County Sanitation Districts: I am opposed to any increase in fees by the Sanitation Districts for any reason. Please be advised of the following evidence: Water Usage Units Year 1 . 3019 1990 2. 2545 1991 3. 2541 1992 4. 927 (thru 6/8/93 1993 Projecting 1993 to the end of 1993 based on average usage for the first six months gives an expected usage of 1854 units (using water bill units of City of Orange) . This is a 27.4% decrease in usage for 1993 (est. ) . The fact is the O. C. Sanitation District is charging the same fee for current low volume usage as for a substantially higher usage in the previous years. A further fact is that sewer usage has obviously decreased across the board in most businesses and industries because of depressed economic conditions in the County. Conclusion: Any increase in fees under the above conditions would be completely out of reason. The -Sanitation District should be DOWNSIZING -- administration, operations and purchasing. This is what businesses (those still in business) , cities and counties are doing out of necessity because of the depressed state of the economy in Orange County and all of California. urs truly, J e E. Crommett c: Governor Wilson Assemblyman Conroy ' Supervisor Vasquez OFFICE:1045 N.MALLARO,ORANGE,CA 9E887 714-5532-4084 :OUNTY SANITATI ,N DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX$127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 N IN44 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92706.7018 (714)962-2411 July 19, 1993 REF# 391129.LTR James E. Crommett Clean City Laundries 1045 N. Mallard Orange, CA 92667 Permit No: 2-2-126 Subject: Revisions to Ordinance Establishing Administrative Fees The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) have reviewed your July 10, 1993 letter which was sent in response to the Districts' June 29, 1993 notice regarding proposed revisions to the Districts' Ordinance Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees, and Miscellaneous Charges (Fee Ordinance), and the scheduling of a public workshop for July 15, 1993. As discussed in the June 29, 1993 notice, the proposed revisions affect three types of charges: fees for wastewater discharge permits, fees for the treatment and disposal of trucked wastes, and fees for non-compliant discharges. Revisions are being proposed at this time to reflect the actual cost of providing services for which the fees are levied. In your letter, you stated that you were opposed to any increase in fees for any reason based on the following facts: 1) you advised us that the water usage for your coin operated laundry decreased by approximately 27.4% over the last three and one-half years; 2) you noted that the Districts' annual sewer use fee has remained unchanged for the same time period despite the fact that your water usage has decreased; and 3) you noted that sewer use has decreased in most businesses in Orange County because of depressed economic conditions. You further stated that the Districts should be downsizing its administrative, operations and purchasing functions because this is what businesses are doing in all of California. Please be advised that we sympathize with the present condition of California businesses and the troubles they are going through because of the economy. In recognition, the Districts have been able to 'hold the line' on industrial sewer user charges for the last two fiscal years and for the present fiscal year by applying the same budgeting principles you noted in your letter; by using innovative cogeneration facilities which reduce air emissions and save ratepayers money through the production of our own electricity; and by obtaining a treatment waiver from the Federal V V91 ORANGE COUMr.,CALIFORNIA i. James E. Crommett D9 ELL4.9ENL July 19, 1993 vo Box 9127 FWNI•M V•4EC[lt6DAM•921nA121 Page 2 0+119993.++ government which reduces the costs of treating wastewater disposing of biosolids. These combined actions ultimately save our ratepayers over $52 million dollars per year. With regard to your comment that the Districts are charging the same fee for your lower volume water usage as for a higher usage in previous years, please be advised that your actual annual charge for use is based on water usage multiplied by a sewer use fee which is designed to assure that all users of the system pay their proportionate share of the costs of operating and maintaining the Districts' sewerage facilities. Over the past two fiscal years, your sewer user fee has remained the , same, while your sewer user charge has decreased because you have reduced ' your water usage, thereby reflecting a lower proportionate use of the sewerage system. We anticipate that the sewer use fee will not be revised for the 1293-94 fiscal year. With regard to the impact of the proposed fee revisions on your own business, please be advised that these changes do not impact your annual sewer user charge. The only increase typically associated with businesses such as your coin operated laundry would be the fee charged for issuing a Class II Wastewater Discharge Permit. The current Class II permit fee is $33.00 per year. This fee was last revised in 1989. The proposed permit fee is $70.00 per year. This represents an average increase of $7.40 per year since the rates were last revised, and reflect the administrative costs for issuance of Class II permits. Additional information about the fee revision can be provided at your request. We hope this information has been responsive to your comments. Should you have any further questions or comments, please fee free to contact 'this office. f1l •'�Y 1AJAtt�� Margaret H. Nellor Source Control Manager MHN:JW:er REF #391129.LTR cc: J. Wayne Sylvester FEE ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING SOURCE CONTROL FEES, ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES,AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California (hereinafter "District") does hereby find: A. That the District is required by federal and state law, including the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251, et sec.) and the General Pretreatment Regulations (40 C.F.R. 403) to implement and enforce a program for the regulation of wastewater discharges to the District's sewers; and B. That the District is required by federal, state, and local law to meet applicable standards of treatment plant effluent quality; and - C. That pursuant to these requirements, the Board of Directors adopted the Ordinance establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations; and D. That the District incurs additional costs in conducting non-compliance sampling of those industrial wastewater dischargers who violate the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations; and E. That the Ordinance establishing Wastewater Discharge Regulations provides that the Board of Directors is to establish various fees and charges to recover those costs to the District which are made necessary by industrial wastewater dischargers who violate the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations; and F. That the adoption of the proposed fees and charges will provide revenue to assist in the payment of the costs incurred by the District in enforcing its Wastewater Discharge Regulations; and G. That the fees and charges hereby established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated reasonable costs to the District for the administration and implementation of permit and fee processing, non-compliance sampling, and related services associated with the source control program; and H. That the Ordinance establishing wastewater discharge regulations provides for the Board of Directors to establish various rates of fees and charges to recover the costs to the District of implementing its Source Control program in addition to the non-compliance sampling fees; and I. That the adoption of the proposed fees and charges will provide revenue to assist in the payment of costs to the District to provide all regulatory administrative and laboratory services related to the industrial dischargers/users of the District's systems; and J. That an administrative report, including financial analysis and an engineering report has been prepared by the District setting forth and identifying the needs and costs of implementing the District's source control program; and K. That the administrative and engineering reports have been made available to the public and have been presented to the Board at a public meeting, all in accordance with applicable provisions of law; and L. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the provisions of Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). NOW, TBIREF'ORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, do hereby ORDABJ as follows: Section 1• Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to recover those costs incurred by the District when administering the District Source Control Program and to recover the costs incurred when performing non-compliance sampling of industrial wastewater dischargers who have violated the District's Wastewater Discharge Regulations or the terms and conditions of the discharger's permit. Revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance shall be used to defray the costs incurred by the District in performing these tasks. Commencing December 10, 1993, the fees and charges hereby established shall be imposed in the sum or sums as set forth in Tables A and B. Section 2: Administrative Anneals, A. Any user, permit applicant or permittee affected by any decision, action or determination by the District may, within 45 days of the date of mailing by the District of the initial invoice for fees imposed pursuant to this Ordinance, request that the District reconsider imposition of such fees. Following review of such a request the District shall notify the user, permit applicant or permittee by certified mail of the District's decision on the reconsideration request. B. Any user, permit applicant or permittee adversely affected by the Districts' decision on the reconsideration request may file an appeal in accordance with Section 617, and thereafter Section 618, of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations. Section 3: Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application to any person or circumstance is held invalid by order of court, the remainder of the Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected. Section 4: Effective Date. These fees shall become effective January 1, 1994. Section 5• Reneal. Ordinance No. 120, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non- Compliance Sampling Fees, and Miscellaneous Charges, effective February 7, 1992, is hereby repealed on the effective date hereof and all other Ordinances or parts of Ordinances inconsistent with this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent that they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance. Section 6: Certification. The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the District as required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of greater than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held November 10, 1993. Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Assistant Secretary of the Board of Directors, County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California TABLE A SOURCE CONTROL FEES, ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Permit Fees: Chary A. Class I Permit $335.00/yr B. Class 11 Permit $ 70.00/yr C. Class III Permit $ 75.00/3 yr D. Special Purpose Discharge Permit $250.00/yr E. Waste Hauler Discharge Permit $ 75.00/yr F. Transportable Treatment Permit $250.00/yr Waste Hauler Fees: G. Permit Decal Initial Issue $ 25.00 H. Permit Decal Replacement $ 50.00 I. Entry Card Initial Issue $ 50.00 I. Entry Card Replacement $100.00 K. After hours Discharge - Prearranged $ 85.00/event L. After Hours Discharge - Emergency $100.00/event Administrative/Processin¢ Fees: M. Districts Collection of Tax Data $100.00/permit N. Districts Collection of Water $100.00/permit Consumption Data O. Appeal Hearing Filing Fee $400.00 TABLE B NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEE Charee Cost of Processing and Sampling $225.00/event Following a Minor Violation Cost of Processing and Sampling $500.00/event Following a Major Violation Costs for Analyses: 1. Heavy Metals - this one price $ 19.00 price includes analysis for all the following: Cadmium Lead Chromium Silver Copper Zinc Nickel 2. Aluminum $ 19.00 3. Antimony $ 19.00 4. Arsenic $ 19.00 5. Gold $ 19.00 6. Mercury $145.00 7. Molybdenum $ 19.00 8. Palladrum $ 19.00 9. Platinum $ 19.00 10. Selenium $ 19.00 11. Thallium $ 19.00 12. 601/602 $152.00 13. 604 $223.00 14. 606 $254.00 TABLE B CONTINUED NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES Charge 15. 608 $254.00 16. 610 $ 37.00 17. 612 $200.00 18. 624 $219.00 19. 625 $445.00 20. Ammonia Analysis as Nitrogen $ 26.00 21. Biochemical Oxygen Demand $ 29.00 22. BOD and Suspended Solids Analysis $ 36.00 23. Chemical Oxygen Demand $ 14.00 24. Conductivity $ 7.00 25. Cyanide (Amenable) $ 67.00 26. Cyanide (Total) $ 42.00 27. Dissolved Mineral Solids $ 13.00 28. Gamma Radiation Determination $115.00 29. Gross Alpha and Beta Determination $ 50.00 30. Tritium Determination $ 50.00 31. Grease and Oil (Hexane Soluble Matter) $ 79.00 32. Grease and Oil (Mineral Partition) $ 79.00 33. Total Organic Nitrogen $ 26.00 34. pH $ 7.00 TABLE B CONTINUED ' NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES C6arees 35. Fluoride $ 35.00 36. Suspended Solids (Total) $ 7.00 37. Suspended Solids (Total and Volatile) $ 14.00 38. Total Dissolved Solids $ 9.00 39. Total Sulfides $ 20.00 TFN:tw:R:09/07/93:N3804.2 USER CHARGE ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CHARGES FOR USE OF DISTRICT FACILITIES BY INDUSTRIAL USERS AND WASTEHAULERS The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California (hereinafter "District"), does hereby find: A. That a Comprehensive 30-year Master Plan of Capital Facilities entitled "Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan - 1989," hereinafter the "Master Plan," which includes detailed financial and engineering reports, has been prepared, approved and adopted by the Board of Directors setting forth and identifying the required future development of District and jointly owned facilities, including the financial projections for providing sewer service to all properties within the District service area; and, B. That the financial and engineering reports of the Master Plan and the additional administrative and engineering reports have been made available to the public and have been subject to noticed public hearings, all in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 66016 and other provisions of law; and, C. That the revenues derived under the provisions of this Ordinance will be used for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of the wastewater treatment and disposal facilities of the District; to repay principal and interest on debt instruments or to repay federal and state loans issued for the construction and reconstruction of said sewerage facilities, together with costs of administration and provisions for necessary reserve; and, D. That the wastehaulers upon which the fees established by this Ordinance are ' levied, discharge wastewater to the District's treatment and disposal facilities. The costs of providing the disposal station service and monitoring of wastehauler discharges have constantly increased due in part to increased regulatory requirements to upgrade the treatment process; and, E. That additional administrative reports upon which the wastehauler fees are based have been approved and adopted by the Board of Directors setting forth and identifying District financial costs relating to providing treatment and disposal services for wastehaulers; and F. That the proposed increases in the wastehauler service charges are established upon a rational basis between the fees charged each wastehauler and the service and facilities provided to each wastehauler to the District; and G. That the need for upgraded and improved treatment of all wastewater treatment and disposal facilities is required to protect the public health and safety to preserve the environment without damage; and H. That the new fees established by this Ordinance do not exceed the estimated amount required to provide the treatment and disposal service for which the fee is levied, as provided in Govemment Code Sections 66013 and 66016; and, I. That the change in rate structure will not necessarily result in an expansion of facilities to provide for growth outside the existing service area. The adoption of these rates will not result in any specific project nor result in a direct physical change in the environment; and, J. That the District has, on July 19, 1989, adopted a Final Program Environmental Impact Report in accordance with legally required notices and public hearing, related to the Master Plan, including the financial program; and, K. That the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act from further environmental assessment pursuant to the provisions of Califomia Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and California Code of Regulations Section 15273(a). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: Section 302.6(B) of Ordinance No. 119 is hereby amended by substituting the term ORDINANCE for the term RESOLUTION referred to therein. Section 2: Section 303.6(13) of Ordinance No. 119 is hereby amended by substituting the term ORDINANCE for the term RESOLUTION referred to therein. Section : Section 304.6(B) of Ordinance No. 119 is hereby amended by substituting the term ORDINANCE for the term RESOLUTION referred to therein. Section 4: Section 306.7 of Ordinance No. 119 is hereby amended by substituting the term ORDINANCE for the term RESOLUTION referred to therein. Section : Section 702(B)(2)of Ordinance No. 119 is hereby amended by substituting "52,350" for "$1,500" in accordance with the March 11, 1992 action of the Board of Directors. Section : As authorized by Sections 302.6, 303.6 and 304.6 of Ordinance No. 119, the charges for use are hereby established for Class I, Class II and Class III Permittees as set forth in Tables A and B attached hereto. Section 7: As authorized by Section 306.7 of Ordinance No. 119, the charges for use are hereby established for wastehaulers as set forth in Table C attached hereto. Section 8: If any provision of this Ordinance or application thereof to any person or entity is held invalid by order of court, the remainder of the Ordinance or the application of such provision to other persons or entities shall not be affected. Section 9: Effective Date This Ordinance shall become effective January 1, 1994. Section 10 Challenees Any legal challenge to the validity of the charges for use adopted herein shall be made pursuant to the provisions of Health & Safety Code Section 5472. Section 11: Reoeal The following resolution is repealed as of the effective date of this Ordinance: District No. 1 Resolution 91-137-1 Section 12: The Secretary of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary to be published in a newspaper of general circulation as the District is required by law. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the affirmative vote of greater than two-thirds of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held November 10, 1993. Chairman of the Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California ATTEST: Assistant Secretary of the Board of Directors, County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California TABLE A CLASS I AND CLASS li PERMITTEES - CHARGES FOR USE District No. Flow * S.S.(*) B.O.D(*) 1 $205.49 $206.10 $162.25 2 $206.94 $186.20 $146.58 3 $265.28 $185.04 $145.67 5 $297.30 $196.42 $154.63 6 $167.11 $165.67 $130.42 7 $339.87 $187.21 $147.38 11 $278.33 $173.46 $136.56 13 $400.94 $131.30 $103.36 14 $263.32 $118.03 $ 92.92 *Flow - Per million gallons of flow *S.S - Per thousand pounds of suspended solids *B.O.D. - Per thousand pounds of biochemical oxygen demand TABLE B CLASS III PERMITTEES - CHARGES FOR USE District No. Flow 1 $973.50 2 $900.79 3 $954.82 5 $1,029.24 6 $784.44 7 $1,037.49 11 $924.72 13 $890.21 14 $703.15 *Flow - Per million gallons of flow TABLE C WASTEHAULER CHARGES FOR USE Wastehauler Fees hC ar2 A. Charge for Use - Waste Originating $0.035/gallon of truck capacity Within Orange County B. Charge for Use - Waste Originating $0.11/gallon of truck capacity Outside Orange County AGENDA ITEM #14 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CAOFORNIA i0SA4 Elus AVENUE a0 90%9PD October 28, 1993 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CAUFORNIA 92728-8127 n+n9sz3An REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION. RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1993 - 5:30 PM COMMITTEE MEMBERS: OTHERS PRESENT: Present: Charles Puckett, Vice Joint Chairman John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman STAFF PRESENT: John J. Collins Victor Leipzig J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Ted R. Moreno Blake P. Anderson, Director of Leslie A. Pontious Technical Services Sal Sapien Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Peer Swan Bob Omen, Assistant Director of Henry W. Wedaa Operations Charles Egigian Nichols, Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Manager Absent: Burnie Dunlap James M. Ferryman Maria Moreno Carrey J. Nelson Glenn Parker Iry Pickler Robert Richardson Phil Sansone 1.) CONCEPTUAL PROPOSAL FOR MODIFICATION TO JOINT REGIONAL WATER RECLAMATION PROGRAM WITH ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT: A 100 MILLION-GALLONS-PER-DAY (MGD) RECYCLED WATER PROJECT' Utilizing the enclosed "handout" (green), the staff reviewed the accompanying report entitled, "A Joint Water Recycling Strategy for Achieving Water Supply Independence" (blue) outlining a concept jointly developed by the staffs of the Districts and the Orange County Water District for achieving up to 100 million-gallons-per-day in water recycling for metropolitan Orange County. Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee October 28, 1993 This new regional water reclamation concept introduced by staff is to utilize 100 MGD (approximately 100,000 acre-feet per year) of the secondary effluent produced at our Fountain Valley facilities for groundwater recharge and other water reuse purposes in cooperation with the Orange County Water District. The reclaimed water would be pressurized using a new pump station and would flow through a new large diameter pressure pipe along the levee of the Santa Ana River to the existing groundwater recharge facilities located in northeastern Anaheim and operated by the Orange County Water District. While the majority of the reclaimed water would be used for groundwater recharge, other reuse opportunities could be ultimately developed anywhere along the 15 mile-length of the pipeline. Before being pumped through the pipeline from Fountain Valley to Anaheim, the secondary treated water would first receive additional stages of treatment to insure full protection of Orange County's existing groundwater resources, to protect public health, and to meet all relevant regulatory requirements. Treatment to remove some portion of the nitrogen, total dissolved solids and total organic carbon present in the secondary effluent would likely occur. Filtration and disinfection would be required to remove pathogenic organisms. Initial staff estimates place the cost of the project in the "ballpark" of $340 to $475 per-acre-foot of water produced. This estimated unit cost compares favorably with projected MWD wholesale costs which are expected to reach approximately $600 per-acre-foot in the next 10 years. This regional concept differs significantly from the Districts' earlier concept of up to three small upstream satellite water reclamation plants originally described in our 1989 Master Plan entitled, "2020 VISION". Staff has investigated the feasibility of the satellite concept and has concluded that: 1. Satellite reclamation plants with individual capacities of between 5 and 10 MGD (producing between 5,000 and 10,000 acre-feet of water per year) can conceivably be constructed and operated at several sites in the northern area of our service area. 2. Each project would require the acquisition of a site, completing public workshops and hearings, constructing new facilities in communities where public wastewater treatment plant infrastructure does not presently exist, constructing reclaimed water distribution pipe networks within public streets, and having end-use customers who are able and willing to use reclaimed water. 3. Initial cost estimates for the projects range between $1,300 and $1,580 per- acre-foot of water produced. -2- Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee October 28, 1993 Staff also provided information on existing and projected water demands. In 1993, the water demand in the Orange County Water District's service area will be approximately 450,000 acre feet, with one-third of it provided by imported water supplies. In 2010, the projected water demand will be 580,000 acre-feet, but only 10% is anticipated to come from imported sources. This means that water supplied annually from local sources will have to increase from approximately 300,000 acre-feet to approximately 520,000 acre-feet. Obviously, this regional concept, producing approximately 100,000 acre-feet per year, could provide an important part of the new supply. Staff discussed the apparent advantages of the regional concept including: 1. Cost effectiveness as compared to other alternatives 2. Maximized use of existing facilities 3. Minimized community disruption during construction and operation 4. Significant new source of"local' water 5. Ability to equitably distribute project costs across the entire groundwater user base 6. A 15-mile "backbone" line capable of providing reclaimed water to multiple direct end users along its entire length 7. Minimization of siting and permitting issues. An issue important to the Districts but not discussed in the attached draft report is the Districts' proportion of secondary treatment that would be required for ocean discharge. In adopting the 1989 Master Plan, the Districts indicated to the Orange County community that at least 50% of its effluent discharged into the ocean would receive secondary treatment. Beyond this is the issue of complying with the limits on the concentration and mass of approximately 25 constituents regulated in the ocean discharge permit issued to us by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If the Districts diverted up to 100 mgd of its effluent for upstream reclamation, we must consider the technical, economic, and policy impacts of maintaining or changing our level of treatment policy. In considering the polity, the Districts must consult extensively with the EPA, the CRWQCB, the California Coastal Commission, and numerous other interested parties. An important question to consider is our ability to consistently meet our discharge criteria if the percent of secondary treatment for ocean discharge is reduced. Thorough technical analysis will be needed to determine the potential water quality impacts, if any. -3- Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee October 28, 1993 A second issue important to the Districts is the question of long-term hydraulic demands on the Districts' ocean outfall system. The 1989 Master Plan identifies the need to construct a second ocean outfall for routine use by the end of this decade because the capacity of our existing outfall will be exceeded by the projected increased flows from our service area. Of course, these 1989 projections did not take into account the possibility of diverting a 100 mgd increment of effluent flow for reuse purposes. For this reason, staff would have to evaluate the impact of this project on the schedule for constructing a second outfall and would have to reconsider its size and configuration. Several questions immediately come to mind while considering this concept. Assuming that a reliable reuse project is constructed, is it possible to avoid or delay the significant costs of constructing and operating the second ocean outfall? Could these avoided costs partially offset the cost of constructing and operating the reuse project? Or are the hydraulic demands of wet weather conditions so great that this 100 mgd project does little to relieve the long-term need for adequate relief produced by a large outfall? COMMITTEE ACTION The Committee conceptually endorsed the proposal outlined in the report dated October 8, 1993 entitled "A Joint Water Recycling Strategy for Achieving Water Supply Independence" and directed staff to continue to work cooperatively with the OCWD to further study the regional water reclamation concept, and to report back to the Committee on its technical, financial, environmental, regulatory, community, and policy implications, as well as the overall unit costs, in comparison with other water supply alternatives. The Committee also directed staff to develop an amended water recycling policy statement for consideration by the CRR Committee. 2). FUEL CELL DEMONSTRATION UNIT Staff briefed the Committee on the status of acquiring a fuel cell through the Gas Company/South Coast Air Quality Management District demonstration project. Fuel cells are beginning to receive increasing attention as an emerging technology for providing clean, efficient and reliable energy. During staff contacts with representatives of the Gas Company earlier this year, it appeared that the first round of ten demonstration units had been fully subscribed by interested parties and that the Districts could expect an opportunity to participate in the program no sooner than 1994. The Gas Company has recently approached the Districts with the information that one of the interested parties has fallen out of the demonstration program for technical reasons and, as a result, the fuel cell unit originally earmarked for that use is now available for the Districts' consideration. —4— Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee October 28, 1993 The demonstration fuel cell units produce 200 KW of electricity and 760,000 Btu/hour of hot water by combining natural gas and air in a non-burning chemical reaction. The units are said to be nearly pollutant free, 8590 efficient and extremely reliable while producing very "clean" electric power. All of that remains to be proven by their long-term use, of course, which is the purpose of the demonstration project here in the South Coast Air Basin. The Gas Company will provide these units through a "turnkey" contract and at an overall energy price that is roughly 85% of other competitive alternatives. Staff is looking at the best possible application for this technology at our facilities and at the terms of a draft contract with the Gas Company. Considerations for the best location include avoiding impact on existing operational reliability, providing an overall energy demand sufficient to use all of the capacity of the fuel cell, and locating the unit so that accessibility by visiting interested parties and the members of the Joint Boards is maximized. Staff indicated that it would report back to the Committee when the technical and contractual questions of the demonstration project are answered. 3). STATUS OF BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Staff provided a brief update on the Districts' biosolids (sludge) management program. In accordance with the original goal of the Districts' Facilities Master Plan entitled "2020 Vision", the Districts first achieved 100% beneficial reuse of all of the 200,000 wet tons of biosolids produced annually at our Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach treatment facilities in November, 1991. Today, all of our biosolids are utilized by two independent contractors to provide nutrients and humus for agricultural and horticultural purposes. BPA:ahh REF #310096.RP Enclosures (2) -5- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ^a al ORANGE COUNTY, CAOEORNIA tOBaaE 6AVn1UE PO BOX 81 V MUMNNV4 .G CRNN92708 127 October 28, 1993 n,.i B6z 2n, HANDOUT TO THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE HISTORY OF DISTRICTS' POLICY FOR USE OF RECYCLED WATER • 32-YEAR COMMITMENT BEGINNING IN 1961 "...the Districts urge that all methods of reclamation of water from sewage in Orange County...be thoroughly investigated; and that if such studies prove said reclamation to be feasible...make all possible efforts to put said reclamation into effect at the earliest possible date." • 1972 Partnership with OCWD for Water Factory 21 with 15 MGD Commitment • Secondary Effluent to OCWD • OCWD Provide Tertiary Treatment • OCWD Operate Seawater Intrusion Barrier • 1989 Master Plan Adoption • Construct up to Three Upstream Plants • Continue to Supply Secondary Effluent to OCWD • Continue Cooperation with Other Agencies • Develop New Reuse Markets • 1990 Phased Implementation Approach • First Implement Anaheim Forebay/Fullerton Project • Second Implement Crescent Basin Project • Third Implement Seal Beach Project o Figure 1 Proposed Regional Water Recycling Project L.OS ANGELES COUNTYM , 0 R4yceF9 F°k4q�No SANTA ANA L RlV€R SAW A ANA RIVER RECHARGE FACILITIES 'Y 9� PRADO �� DAM 6 ` O U PPFIVE �0�� P�J SANTIAGO CREEK �C� FWCIXN.V6 ECHARGE BAD 09 O W � eFFF qo TAR WE SAN77AGO CREEK rx.vwxaE 3 pPipelineto $ Imperial Head Gate tWE OCINDICSU C PACIFIC OCEAN 1 POTENTIAL SITES O WASTE WATER DISPOSAL COMPANY © LA PALMA N © CRESCENT BASIN Q GSA SURPLUS SITE 0 STATE COLLEGE BLVD/WINSTON RD SITE 0 WHAT'S AT STAKE? A NEED FOR A RELIABLE, LOCAL, LONGTERM WATER SUPPLY 1993 Conditions 2010 Project Conditions 450,000 AF 580,000 AF 67% local supplies 90% local supplies 33% imported 10% imported THE PROJECT • TREATMENT: DISTRICTS' OCWD • PUMP STATIONS & PIPELINES • RECHARGE FACILITIES • ESTIMATED COSTS IMPORTANT DISTRICTS' ISSUES • 50% SECONDARY TREATMENT OF DISCHARGE • SECOND OUTFALL EXPANSION l 1 PROJECT BENEFITS • COST-EFFECTIVE • MAXIMIZES EXISTING FACILTITFS • MINHvHZES COMMUNITY DISRUPTIONS • USES LOCAL RESOURCES TOWARDS GOAL OF RELIABLE LONG-TERM WATER SUPPLY • EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION OF COSTS AND BENEFITS • BACKBONE DELIVERY PIPELINE FOR OTTER POTENTIAL. USES RAFT A JOINT WATER RECYCLING STRATEGY FOR ACHIEVING WATER SUPPLY INDEPENDENCE �turrq, 4 JrL z Z 4r OCWD/CSDOC Draft October 8, 1993 AFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .- _ _� Water reclamation or recycling is a critical part of water resources management in Southern California. Continued population growth and recurrent drought conditions intensify the need for a reliable, drought-proof water supply. Although ongoing reclamation projects operated by Orange County Water District (OCWD) and Irvine Ranch Water District recycle over 38,000 acre feet per year (AFY), there is a need to do more with local recycled water resources that are not fully utilized. For the past several years, OCWD and County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) have investigated the feasibility of siting and constructing up to three new satellite water reclamation plants within Orange County. The projects ranged in size from 5,600 to 11,000 AFY (5 - 10 million gallons per day, mgd) and had projected costs between $50 and $133 million each (primary through tertiary treatment and distribution system). The cost to produce recycled water was projected to be $1,300 - $1,600 per AF, two to four times the current cost of imported MWD water ($385 per AF). These estimated costs are high due to the large capital expense involved in acquiring a site and constructing new facilities that would produce a limited amount of recycled water. Such facilities do not appear to be cost effective and because of local siting issues, these treatment plants may not receive support from local communities. Recently, CSDOC and OCWD staff began collaborative investigations into the feasibility of a large scale reclamation project utilizing existing and planned wastewater resources. A large regional 100,000 AFY (100 mgd) project is envisioned as a joint effort between OCWD and CSDOC. Highly treated effluent produced by tertiary treatment and organics removal, at CSDOC's Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley, would be pumped up the Santa Ana River via a pipeline. Energy to pump the recycled water may be provided by CSDOC's central generation system. The recycled water would be placed into the OCWD's spreading basins located in the Anaheim Forebay for groundwater recharge. The project would utilize the OCWD's available capacity in its existing 1,600 acre groundwater recharge facility. Facilities would be expanded in three phases. Phase I would produce 50,000 AFY of reclaimed water in the year 2000. Production would be increased to 75,000 AFY and 100,000 AFY in the years 2010 and 2020, respectively. Initial cost estimates for Phase I show that from the start, the regional reclamation facility would produce water equivalent to or less than in the cost for Metropolitan Water District water (approximately $600 per AF in the year 2000). The cost to produce reclaimed water from the regional project could be as low as $340 per AF. Costs estimates show that reclaimed water meeting all regulations would not exceed $475 per AF. 2 RAFT An integral part of the water recycling program would be total dissolved solids T control in wastewater. A regional brine and salts management program could be required to ensure low TDS for recycling purposes, thus reducing the cost of demineralization. Public acceptance of the proposed water recycling project is anticipated to be positive since the project ensures a firmer water supply by using local resources. The water recycling program maximizes the use of existing facilities and minimizes unit costs. No additional treatment facilities would be sited within the community other than the pipeline along the Santa Ana River and new support facilities at the existing CSDOC and OCWD sites. The program is designed to benefit all users of the Orange County water basin by offering a firm water supply rather than recycled water to a limited number of prospective recycled water users. In conclusion, Southern California's stability is threatened by inadequate regional water supplies. However, a sound and economical solution, ie. water recycling, is within reach for Orange County through development and implementation of an aggressive,comprehensive water recycling master plan. The proposed CSDOC/OCWD 100,000 AFY project would be the largest water recycling program in Southern California and would ensure a drought-resistant water supply at minimal cost. 3 Li' AFT Present water supplies will not meet future demands in Orange oun y Southern California has historically enjoyed the advantage of receiving potable water from a variety of sources including Northern California, the Eastern Sierras, the Colorado River, and local groundwater basins. The past several years' experience with drought and environmental restrictions lie. new Endangered Species Act listings) indicate that Southern California will very likely experience increased water shortages as imported water supplies become less dependable. The water supply situation is exacerbated by the addition of 250,000 new residents each year to Southern California, despite the state's sluggish economy. Approximately 60% of the population growth is internal. Historically, the amount of water expected to be transferred from Northern to Southern California has never materialized. Recent environmental concerns in the Delta have caused the State Water Project (SWP) to fall short of its contractual water commitments most of the time. The need to reserve an average of 800,000 acre feet per year (AFY) of SWP and Central Valley Project water for endangered species as proposed by the State Water Resources Control Board suggests that there may be further limitations on water supplies for transport to Southern California. In addition, the Environmental Protection Agency has indicated that the state proposed water allocations for endangered species may not be sufficient and may require additional water. Agriculture presently uses approximately 85% of the state's water supply. Marketing and transfer of water from agricultural areas for urban use is possible, but environmental needs in the Delta must first be met. Most of the agricultural water available for transfer occurs north of the Delta. Transport of the water must occur through the Delta, thus placing the transferred water under the environmental restrictions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). In accordance with the ESA, pumps in the Delta can only operate unrestricted one month each year. In addition, contractual, legal and political issues regarding water transfers have not been resolved. Therefore it appears that water transfers will not constitute a dependable resource for Southern California's water supply in the future. Southern California also receives approximately 1.2 million acre feet per year (MAFY) of Colorado River water. This supply will decrease as Arizona takes its full water allocation. Completion of the Central Arizona Project will reduce the amount of dependable Colorado Aqueduct water to Southern California by 50%. 1 j RAFT MWD plans to increase water supply reliability through an Integrate esource an In response to Southern California's potential water shortage problems, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) has implemented an ongoing Strategic Plan whose mission is to provide "adequate and reliable supplies of high quality water to meet present and future needs in an environmentally and economically responsible way." One of MWD's tools for implementation of the Strategic Plan includes an Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). MWD plans on increasing reliability of water resources by increasing Colorado River and SWP supplies, as well as promoting water conservation, local reclamation, desalination, and conjunctive groundwater use. The Strategic Plan states, "The region must also move ahead with present commitments of hundreds of millions of dollars to the construction of projects to reclaim and reuse water." The IRP will determine what combination of the resources mentioned above is best to increase and maintain reliability. There are local concerns over the long-term reliability of MWD's water supply. MWD plans to increase its reliability by the year 2010 to meet 100% of water needs 90% of the time. Several problematic issues include an aging distribution system, lack of reservoirs, and decreased water quality of imported Delta water which provides greater than 50% of MWD's supply. These concerns are being currently addressed by MWD in its Strategic Plan. Orange County's economy depends on a reliable water supply The lack of a reliable water supply can have a significant economic impact on Orange County as determined in a 1991 survey of California industries by Spectrum Economics, Inc.' The survey was conducted to determine the long-term impact of a water shortage on the state's industries by county. It was estimated that prolonged drought conditions in Orange County could result in the loss of 1.5% of manufacturing production valued at $400 million. If a 30% cut-back in water supplies to Orange County industries occurred, the loss of employment was estimated to be 1 .9% or 4,800 jobs. Other losses due to a water shortage include decreased golf course and park revenues, as well as diminished productivity in commercial agriculture. Increasing water resources by development of local supplies in the Orange County Water District (OCWD) service area is critical. As shown in Figure 1, the OCWD service area consumes about 450,000 AFY of water. Approximately 33% is imported water supplied by MWD. Each water retailer uses a combination of its own Cost of Industrial Water Shortages: Preliminary Observations, Report to California Urban Water Agencies, Spectrum Economics. Inc., April 11, 1991. 2 RAFT groundwater supplies, if available, and MWD water. Growth between now and 2010 will result in an increased dependence on MWD for water, unless local water supplies are further developed to meet growing needs. An additional 130,000 AFY of water will be needed by the year 2010 to meet anticipated demands in Orange County. Currently, MWD supplies Orange County with 160,000 AFY of imported water. In order to increase reliability and dependence on local water supplies, it is anticipated that in the year 2010, 100,000 AFY of Santa Ana river water will be recharged into Orange County's groundwater via groundwater spreading basins. Another 130,000 AFY of water is envisioned from water reclamation projects. Therefore, in order to achieve 90% reliability in Orange County, reclaimed water must play an increasingly important role in water resources management. Figure 1. Demand and Sources of Water in OCWD's Service Area roo mw.,wae.ww oao yo 000 / w •xv w� eee zoo rrw.. owrw,. o,.r�. tart 0 1na.o. po+o Comprehensive water resources management can ensure Orange County a reliable water supply Having water available when we need it is critical for planning and economic development of sustainable communities in Orange County. This objective can be achieved through comprehensive local water demand and supply management. The high precipitation during January and February of 1993 and the resulting short-term increased water supply, does not change the fact that effective water management mandates that long-term planning for subsequent droughts and continued regional growth be addressed today. Presently, OCWD is able to meet its water demands by relying primarily on the local groundwater basin. However, future demands and drought conditions will require that reclamation projects, in combination with groundwater storage, satisfy a larger portion of the water supply demand as shown in Figure 2. Local supply is also critical for disaster preparedness planning for north Orange County since MWD's extensive 3 RAFT transmission system for imported water is susceptible to damage in the event of a major earthquake. Figure 2. Local Reliability Can be Achieved Through Comprehensive Water Resources Management soo inld..walY.l�1 !00 T.W W! YOY1 MYvwn 600 Ylv!! 9Y�u�u J00 PIW,FImn Joo L mmraYlYr L; 1ao OmuMnY, 0 1P]0 ]! L!0 !b U10 !! 2000 05 2010 �'w0 A dependable supply of water utilized by Orange County is the Santa Ana River. Baseflow has increased over the past 20 years from approximately 40,000 AFY in 1970 to over 120,000 AFY in 1992 as upper basin wastewater discharges to the river have increased. Flow projections indicate continued increase as upstream wastewater dischargers serve a growing population. For the past 60 years OCWD has captured river flow in its spreading basins for groundwater replenishment. However, a constraint on the use of river water for groundwater recharge is the seasonal nature of flows which are typically low in the summer when water demand is high. Therefore, resources such as reclaimed water, need to be expanded to meet Orange County's water requirements. Water reclamation is a critical factor in water resources management in north Orange County The potential demand for recycled water in Orange County has been well documented; it now amounts to about 36,000 AFY. Reclaimed water uses include landscape irrigation, industrial use, toilet and urinal flushing, agricultural irrigation, and groundwater replenishment. The largest potential use in Orange County is for landscape irrigation, ie. irrigation of golf courses, green belts, parks, school yards, etc. These are the easiest facilities to retrofit with reclaimed water pipelines. A chief constraint with reclaimed water distribution is the cost to install pipelines in existing streets. Traffic congestion and concern of local businesses for potential loss of revenue during pipe installation can be problematic. 4 L_ RAFT * The demand for reclaimed water is quite variable. Landscape irrigation wit reclaimed water is typically nocturnal as well as seasonal. The highest demands occur between 9 pm to 6 am due to normal landscape irrigation schedules. For this reason, large capacity reservoir systems are needed to meet these peak demands. Seasonally, reclaimed water use is highest in the summer and decreases in the winter rainy months. It is very costly for water reclamation project treatment and storage facilities to be designed to meet peak daily and seasonal needs. For most Orange County uses, some portion of reclaimed water must be treated to reduce total dissolved solids (TDS) or salts to meet the Regional Water Quality Control Board's Basin Plan requirements and to avoid salt sensitivity problems in landscape and golf course irrigation. Desalting is an expense treatment process, costing up to $55O per AF. However, source control may provide some relief from this cost. There are examples of effective source control. Cities such as Irvine have limited the use of home regenerative water softeners. The city of Chino has also implemented a salts discharge limit for wastewater. Brines may also be appropriately disposed of in a brineline, such as the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) to segregate high salts away from reclaimable water. Additional planning on a regional basis for salts control in Orange County can help to further reduce salts and also the cost to produce reclaimed water. Water recycling, as a local resource, will become more economically attractive as MWD's rates increase for imported water supplies. Figure 3 illustrates that the MWD price is expected to approach $600 per AF by the year 2000. In comparison, costs for water recycling range from $300 to $6OO per AF (not including primary and secondary treatment). MWD projects that development of a new imported water supply, if available, would cost an estimated $800 per AF. By the year 2000, the cost to produce recycled water is expected to be favorable when compared to MWD's price for imported water. Figure 3. MWD's Price for Imported Water Will Continue to Increase Despite Its Reliability 1,200 $/AF ❑ MWD Seasonal Treated 1,000 0 MWD Seasonal Untreated+RA 800 600 400 200 0 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 5 RAFT Reclaimed water pricing can be a strategic approach to promoting a reuse market. Today, reclaimed water pricing in Southern California ranges up to 90% of the MWD imported water price. The cost to produce reclaimed water is often much higher than its market price. In order to increase the economic feasibility of reclamation projects, MWD currently offers a $154 per AF subsidy. Limited State Revolving Funds are also available as low interest loans to finance capital projects. The regulatory climate for implementing reclaimed water projects in California has become increasingly favorable as a result of more than 200 successful reclaimed water projects. Proposed state regulations will allow for approximately 36 new reclaimed water uses including toilet and urinal flushing. The state has mandated through law the use of reclaimed water, if available, for eleven beneficial uses including flushing of sanitary sewers, dust control, soil compaction, and fire fighting. The State Legislature's Water Recycling Act of 1991 declared that the use of potable water is wasteful when reclaimed water is available for landscape irrigation and other purposes. The act mandated the use of reclaimed water where it does not pose an economic hardship on the user. These new laws and regulations should facilitate the implementation of new projects which are expected to provide over 1 MAFY of recycled water to California by the year 2010. Local water agencies have had compelling reasons to implement water recycling Many of the local water reclamation success stories have occurred in areas unable to dispose of treated wastewater or without a local water supply. In the case of Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD), difficulties in permitting for an ocean outfall for discharge made water reclamation the logical option. IRWD pioneered the first successful large scale water reclamation program in Orange County. Reclaimed water has been used for landscape irrigation and recently for toilet and urinal flushing in an office building. The lack of a groundwater supply and total dependence on MWD for imported water were reasons for agencies in south Orange County to implement reclamation programs. Since this area has only recently been developed, it was economical to install reclaimed water lines simultaneously with other utilities in new developments. As in the case of the IRWD, south Orange County was able to install reclaimed water distribution lines easily as the area was developed. Expensive retrofitting was not required in either case. 6 RAFT Future water reclamation projects face local constraints not encountered y previous projects By comparison, central and north Orange County agencies, which have access to potable water supplies from both groundwater wells and MWD supplies, have less interest in reclaimed water than south Orange County. In addition, wastewater disposal is not a problem. CSDOC discharges advanced primary and secondary effluent via a 4.5 mile long ocean outfall. Despite the lack of compelling economic or institutional reasons for these areas to use reclaimed water today, the importance of reclamation to help ensure a reliable future water supply is fully recognized by these agencies. The reclaimed water market in Orange County was defined as part of OCWD's water recycling master plan and feasibility reports. The results of the studies showed that potential recycled water use is widely dispersed based on current and predicted water demand. Golf courses and greenbelts, identified as the most likely users of reclaimed water due to their large water demands, could use about 29,000 AFY. Results of these studies showed that potential users were widely dispersed and the cumulative reclaimed water need for the Anaheim Forebay area was only 5,060 AFY. Water reclamation needs within the OCWD service area were estimated at only 29,000 AFY. The marketing studies were limited, however, in that they did not evaluate the economics of retrofitting existing facilities or the willingness of the potential users to commit to receiving reclaimed water. Dual plumbing systems exist but are very limited in their present application. Dial plumbing has been installed in an office building for toilet and urinal flushing in the IRWD service area and in the administration building of the OCWD. Anaheim's new City Hall has also been constructed to use reclaimed water for flushing purposes. Operating and maintaining dual systems requires additional resources. For this reason, use of reclaimed water within structures is restricted to commercial buildings and requires a yearly system check for cross connections to the potable water supply. Careful plumbing maintenance is necessary in such buildings to ensure that no cross connections occur between potable and reclaimed water supplies. Backflow prevention devices, cross connection inspections, and the use of purple taped piping are also required for use of reclaimed water in buildings. Overall, the amount of water reclaimed by high rise buildings in the OCWD service area is not expected to be significant. Orange County clearly has a potential reclaimed water market; however, without a compelling need, the cost to lay distribution lines in major streets may make reclamation projects economically infeasible. This has prompted the need to evaluate alternative reclamation projects which provide regional reclaimed water rather than supplying the local end users. 7 RAFT Joint CSDOC/OCWD water reclamation activities have determined that the snmg an construction of small reclamation projects may be cost prohibitive For the past three years, the OCWD and CSDOC staff have been investigating the feasibility of building up to three satellite water recycling facilities in Orange County (Anaheim Forebay, Seal Beach, and Central Orange County areas). The two districts have approximately the same service area and share common goals for implementation of water recycling projects. Master plans and siting feasibility reports describing recycled water demands and potential users were prepared for the districts. Water recycling goals and policies were set forth by the CSDOC board upon adoption of their 1989 Master Plan. Staff from both districts first focused on siting of the potential reclamation facility in the Anaheim/Fullerton area since this appeared to be the most feasible area. In many regards, the findings of these studies may be considered representative of the other locations in Seal Beach and Central Orange County. Three parcels were selected in the Anaheim Forebay as potential sites for a reclamation plant. Engineering feasibility studies were completed on the parcels to estimate capital as well as operations and maintenance (O&M) costs. A 5 mgd facility would cost $50 to $60 million, whereas a 10 mgd plant would cost $102 million 11991 dollars). A comparison of capital and reclaimed water production costs for the three sites is given in Figure 4. Costs were determined as part of the engineering feasibility studies completed for CSDOC and OCWD. The estimated cost to produce reclaimed water ranged from $1,300 to nearly $1,600 per AF. Even with MWD's $154 per AF subsidy, the cost to produce recycled water is much higher than the price of imported water (currently $385 per AF). Figure 4. Estimated Costs to Site and Construct 5 to 10 mgd Facilities and Produce Recycled Water are High Compared to MWD Prices sip sisn sns nag suss II flSt 5mgd iSIM 1 )amity Ig mgEr 1 i W WOc C'..' U pe. aum 9"n CAMAL COSTS SWA,,..p J,n m,11,nns1 8 DRAFT ] Several concerns arose from the site selection research. Most of the sites were previously used for industrial or agricultural activities and carry potential liability of subsurface and groundwater contamination. IAgriculturai land may be contaminated with pesticides and fertilizers.) It was also difficult to locate sites close to potential recycled water users, yet far enough away from residential areas to minimize public concerns. In addition, only small sites are available in north Orange County, due to extensive development. Siting of a new facility in most locations would mean disruption of traffic along major through-streets. The support of city agencies would be required to coordinate with local businesses located along streets under construction. Siting of a new reclamation facility would require extensive air quality monitoring and permits, since low, but acceptable, levels of reactive organic gases and other emissions are produced during primary and secondary treatment. The feasibility reports researched potential reclaimed water users; however, the reports did not identify their willingness to incur retrofit costs or use reclaimed water. Several city planning and water departments felt that a site would have to be selected prior to obtaining commitment from potential reclaimed water users. In August 1992, letters were sent from CSDOC to cities in north Orange County requesting their support of water recycling policy and CSDOC's siting efforts. Several cities had financial concerns over cost of distribution lines and stated there was a lack of funds available to support reclamation facilities even though financial support was not requested of the cities in the letter. Other cities were interested in additional information on the proposed facilities. Although subsequent meetings were held between CSDOC staff and city planning and water departments, there was no commitment of funds or support for locating a facility at a particular site. The option to pursue siting and construction of up to three small facilities, which has been under investigation, does not seem economically feasible or locally acceptable. The large capital outlay for these facilities ($50 to $133 million), compared to the relatively small amount of water potentially produced (up to 11 ,000 AFY) makes this option seem economically impractical at this time. A regional 100,000 AFY water reclamation facility is proposed as a cost effective water recycling solution A regional 100,000 AFY (100 mgd) project is envisioned to help ensure a reliable water supply to Orange County. In order to achieve a highly reliable water supply in Orange County, an additional 100,000 AFY of Santa Ana River water and 130,000 AFY of reclaimed water is needed (Figure 5). Approximately 30,000 AFY of reclaimed water will be available through expansion of existing reclamation projects at IRWD and OCWD. The proposed regional project would offset the need for the remaining 100,000 AFY by making use of local resources while maximizing groundwater storage 9 DRAFT as part of local comprehensive water resources management. n i e other reclamation projects, this project would provide county-wide benefits by increasing the overall groundwater supply. Reclaimed water would reduce the amount of water purchased from MWD at increasing costs. Figure 5. The Regional Water Reclamation Facility Would Help Ensure Orange County a Reliable Water Supply as Future Demands Increase roo mooe.^eeeucrw� soo IN rno•oiner se.n.. soo IN ReNImM WMr' aae llel YgpY. I.d R�GWW 100 0 +sua. .ale The project would involve pumping approximately 100,000 AFY (100 mgd) of tertiary treated effluent from CSDOC's Plant No. 1 up the Santa Ana River to the OCWD's groundwater recharge facilities. The recharged groundwater basin would provide additional water to the region. Figure 6 shows the location of the proposed pipeline leading to the spreading basins along the Santa Ana River in north Orange County. Hydrological studies using the Army Corp of Engineers data from 1950 to 1985 show that groundwater recharge efforts can be maximized 10 months out of the year. Over 100,000 AF could potentially be recharged into the basin in addition to the current and anticipated flows in the Santa Ana River. Figure 6. The Proposed Regional Reclamation Project Would Provide 100,000 AFY of Reclaimed Water to OCWD's Groundwater Spreading Facilities g R,m R:.ao o.m p n R»ReryeRNNee. on,w.coe^ry ocwo:csooc +on^a F Bwrq.ry e H � 10 JDRAFT1 Regional brine and salts management is essential to minimize project costs igure . The lower the salts concentration in water and wastewater, the less desalting treatment required to produce reclaimed water. Increasing salt concentrations in water supplies and the subsurface have led to degraded water quality. Without a management plan to reduce salts loading, wastewater supplies in north Orange County will continue to increase in salts. Sources of salts in wastewater supplies include increased use of home regenerative water softeners, industrial desalting/deionizing processes and Colorado River water. Figure 7. A Regional Brine and Salt Management is Key to Reducing Reclaimed Water Costs o � . i 1 0 Methods to facilitate brine management include the use of dedicated brinelines and water softener ordinances. The SARI line was constructed to receive brines from various point sources in Orange, Riverside and San Bernadino Counties. As additional brines are produced by proposed desalters and reclamation facilities, disposal of these brines into the SARI or similar dedicated brine lines which bypass CSDOC's Plant No. 1 prevents further degradation and improves wastewater quality. Ordinances limiting salt discharges from home water softeners may be developed through coordinated efforts with the cities. Ordinances have been developed for salts management in selected cities such as Chino and Irvine. In addition to TDS, sodium, chloride, and sulfate concentrations in reclaimed water must be minimized in order to be of acceptable quality. Ultimately, brine management should reduce the salt load in wastewater tributary to CSDOC's Plant No. 1 and therefore reduce treatment costs. Reclaimed water quality objectives are achievable for the regional 100,000 AFY project Reclaimed water pumped into the OCWD spreading basins will be monitored for and meet specific water quality standards. Newly proposed regulations for groundwater recharge require the total nitrogen concentration to be less than 10 mg/Las nitrogen. 11 L) RAFT Partial nitrification/denitrification treatment can be cost effective y accomplisne CSDOC's Plant No. 1 in order to meet nitrogen requirements. Total organic carbon (TOC) limits for groundwater recharge are based upon the percent reclaimed water contribution. For example, surface water spreading of 46 to 50% reclaimed water must meet a Department of Health Services water quality standard of 6 mg/L for TOC. Additional dilution of the reclaimed water with Santa Ana River water may help to meet this standard. Removal of TDS to meet Basin Plan requirements of 600 mg/L for groundwater recharge should be accomplished as a result of regional brine and salt management and the desalting of a portion of the reclaimed water, using reverse osmosis treatment. Underground detention times and production well set-back distances and blending of reclaimed water with Santa Ana River water and imported water would have to be evaluated thoroughly in feasibility studies for this project. The above mentioned water quality factors require further investigation but do appear to be achievable in a cost- effective manner for the regional 100,000 AFY project. Travel time of the water, once percolated through the basins and subsurface is estimated to be on the order of months to years. Preliminary cost estimates for the proposed 100,000 AFY project were based on the assumptions given in Appendix A. It was assumed that the facilities would be constructed in three stages over the next 30 years. Phase I would be completed in the year 2000 and would provide 50,000 AFY of reclaimed water to the spreading basins for groundwater recharge. Tertiary treated water produced at CSDOC would be pumped up a 15 mile pipeline to the groundwater spreading basins. A computer model was used to determine that reclaimed water could be used for recharge purposes for 10 months per year based on Santa Ana River flows and groundwater recharge practices from the past 60 years. Cost estimates in the Appendices are only for the Phase I construction and operation. Phase II and Phase III would be substantially less as more product water is produced using the existing pipeline and pump station. The cost for reverse osmosis treatment will be minimized by the implementation of a regional brine and salts management plan to maintain and reduce salts entering CSDOC's Plant No. 1 . It was assumed in the cost estimates that source water to the regional treatment facilities would contain 900 mg/L TDS. Costs to pump the reclaimed water to the spreading basins offset a portion of energy costs for pumping to the ocean outfall. A certain portion of the energy required for the regional reclamation project could be supplied by CSDOC's central generation power and therefore reduce energy costs. 12 RAFT Cost estimates were developed for three options or levels of treatment of reverse osmosis and microfiltration) for Phase I are given in Appendix B. The amount of microfiltration and TDS level in the product water varied for the three options. Appendix B also shows the comparison of product water quality with water quality requirements set for the Santa Ana River Reach 3 and the groundwater quality objectives plus a reclamation increment or allowance. Based on the assumptions given in Appendix A and B, Appendix C shows the breakdown of the estimated facilities and O&M costs for Phase I of the regional project. Option A appears to be the most cost effective. The total cost for reclaimed water production in Option A is less than $350/AF. In this option the recycled water would contain approximately 650 mg/L TDS. Options B and C both produce water costing over $400 /AF and contain either more microfiltration or reverse osmosis treatment. The majority of the cost to produce reclaimed water in each case can be attributed to 0&M costs for desalting and microfiltration. Costs to produce recycled water as shown in the various options are minimized by the large volume of reclaimed water produced which lowers the unit cost. Also, utilization of existing OCWD spreading basins and CSDOC primary and secondary treatment facilities helps to minimize costs. The regional project does not require land acquisition as in the case of the previously mentioned small satellite reclamation facilities. All of the options appear economically feasible when compared to the anticipated MWD price for water in the year 2000 (approximately $600 per AF). Most importantly, the regional project provides a firm water supply whereas MWD water is not as reliable. Public acceptance of the regional 100,000 AFY facility is expected to be favorable as a means of increasing local water supply reliability Public acceptance for the proposed joint CSDOC/OCWD project is expected to be favorable. Unlike other reclamation projects, no new facilities would be sited, thereby avoiding many community concerns. The constraints associated with siting, permitting and construction of a new treatment facility would be avoided or minimized. The proposed regional 100,000 AFY water reclamation option is an equitable concept, as it would serve the needs of all residents of Orange County rather than a limited area surrounding a traditional water recycling plant. This option maximizes the use of existing facilities owned and operated by CSDOC and OCWD. It would be the largest water reclamation project in Southern California and would ensure a firm water supply to Orange County. 13 DRAFT The proposed regional 100,000 AFY facility benefits all of Orange Couity an increases the reliability of its water supply using local resources The benefits of the regional water reclamation project are provided below: 1. Helps achieve the goal of a reliable long-term water supply for sustainable economic development and environmental protection in Orange County. 2. Keeps comprehensive water resources management at a local level. 3. Provides water to all of north Orange County and is therefore equitable in that all within the county service area share the costs through groundwater pumping and property taxes for sanitation services. 4. Utilizes local resources, not imported ones, to achieve a reliable water supply. 5. Increases Orange County's groundwater supply by as much as 100,000 AFY. 6. Maximizes the use of Orange County's groundwater basin for storage to meet peak demands and drought conditions. 7. Provides a brine management program, necessary to protect all wastewater reclamation resources. Conclusions Water reclamation is a major part of any program aimed at achieving water supply dependability. Regional and local planning must continue to develop firm water supply projects in spite of present unfavorable economic conditions. The need for support from the cities within the OCWD and CSDOC service area is critical in implementing a regional salt and brine management plan to protect water quality. Recommendations The OCWD and CSDOC staff recommend that both boards approve and support additional joint efforts in water reclamation for the reasons previously provided. A previously drafted policy statement is provided in Appendix D. It is envisioned that both districts will be involved to some extent in the adoption of new reclamation policies and drafting environmental impact reports. Plans for facilities expansion at CSDOC Plant No. 1 may have to be accelerated. Implementation of a regional salt and brine management program is needed as a first step. 14 RAFT ` The roles and responsibilities of the two districts must be defined. Financial considerations for the construction of the pipeline and additional tertiary treatment facilities need to be addressed. Additional costs include maintenance of the groundwater spreading basins, monitoring wells, and water quality analyses. An integrated surface and recycled water spreading program and a groundwater management plan would be required to effectively utilize the reclaimed water. In light of the identified needs presented above, staff from the OCWD and CSDOC present the following recommendations for implementing a proposed water reclamation program: 1) A joint policy statement or complementary policy statements should be approved by the boards of both the OCWD and CSDOC to set forth their joint water reclamation mission statement and reclamation objectives. 2) A regional salt and brine management plan must be prepared to ensure that wastewater at CSDOC's Plant No. 1 is of the lowest practical salt content for water reclamation purposes. 3) Public officials and staff from local and regional agencies must be informed of the proposed joint water reclamation program so that they may provide their guidance and support for a firm water supply. An education/public information program should be developed as soon as possible. 4) OCWD/CSDOC should jointly seek MWD's support of the proposed project which satisfies in part identified needs of MWD as described in their IRP. 5) OCWD/CSDOC should jointly seek state and federal funding. 6) CSDOC, in cooperation with OCWD, should seek the support of the cities within its service areas to put forth policies, ordinances, and facilities planning at the local level to support water reclamation and the proposed project. 15 ) RAFT APPENDIX A Cost Assumptions for the Regional Reclamation Facility 1 . Project will pump water an average of 10 months (305 days) per year. 2. The pipeline up the Santa Ana River is approximately 15 miles long. If aligned mainly along the river then assume $50 million. 3. The project will be constructed in 3 phases according to the draft schedule. Phase 1 will produce 50,000 AFY in 2000 Phase 2 will produce 75,000 AFY in 2010 Phase 3 will produce 100,000 AFY in 2020 4. The pump station and pipeline costs are the same regardless of phase of the project lie. 50,000; 75,000; 100,000 AFY). The pump station will cost $12 million and the pipeline is estimated at $50 million. 5. Reverse osmosis & microfiltration costs are based on 900 mg/L TDS in source water. 6. Pumping costs are assumed to be the same regardless of the phase of the project (50, 75, 100 mgd). Pumping will use a blend of CSDOC's central generation energy and Southern California Edison. Cost estimated to be approximately 4 cents per Kwh. Pumping costs will be partially offset by the savings incurred from not pumping to the ocean (25% of cost to pump up the Santa Ana River). Costs are estimated at $ 1 million per year for 50,000 AFY (Phase 1). 7. It was determined that the groundwater basin can take up to 100,000 AFY on a long-term basis. 8. Disinfection will be required prior to pumping up the river and is factored in the capital and O&M costs. 9. Nitrification/denitrification will be required to meet the 10 mg/L limit. It was assumed that this would cost $50 per AF and would be a part of the CSDOC secondary facilities expansion at Plant No. 1 . 10. Costs were compared with requirements of the RWQCB for the Santa Ana River Reach 3 and groundwater quality objectives plus reclamation increment requirements. 16 APPENDIX B ® RAFT- Assumptions Used for Cost Estimates for Three Treatment Options All Options assume production of 50,000 AFY in the year 2000 and that the influent water has a TDS of 900 mg/L. Option A Product water has 650 mg/L TDS. Treatment includes partial microfiltration. Option B Product water has 600 mg/L TDS. Treatment includes partial microfiltration. Option C Product water has 600 mg/L TDS. Treatment includes fullmicrofiltration. Comparison of Product Water Quality for the Three Ootions Chemical Option A Option B Option C Santa Ana River Groundwater Constituent Reach 3 Req. + Reclamation Increment Req. TDS 650 mg/L 600 mg/L 600 mg/L 600 mg/L 600 mg/L Sodium 143 mg/L 139 mg/L 139 mg/L 110 mg/L 130 mg/L Chloride 151 mg/L 140 mg/L 140 mg/L 140 mg/L 130 mg/L Sulfate 140 mg/L 122 mg/L 122 mg/L 150 mg/L 160 mg/L TOC 8.6 mg/L 5.5 mg/L 5.5 mg/L 6 mg/L 6 mg/L Cost/AF $339/AF $446/AF $473/AF 17 ® RAFT APPENDIX C Cost Breakdown for the Phased Reoional Reclamation Proiect Option A Option B Option C 50,000 AFY 50,000 AFY 50,000 AFY Phase I Phase I Phase I Pump Station $ 12 M $ 12 M $ 12 M 15 mi pipeline $ 50 M $ 50 M - $ 50 M Capital repay Assume $20 M State loan at 3% and rest 600,000 600,000 600,00 ($42 MI at 6% per yr. 2,520,000 2,520,000 2,520,000 3,120,000 3,120,000 3,120,000 Annual capital repay pump stat. + pipe $ 62.40 /AF $ 62.40 /AF $62.40 /AF 10 mo. pump 50,000 AF 50,000 AF 50,000 AF 50,000 AFY Pumping cost $ 1 M $ 1 M $ 1 M $/AF pumping $ 20/AF $ 20/AF $ 20/AF Capital MF/RO $ 31 ,581 ,701 $ 54,194,446 $ 66,057,991 6% repay $ 1 ,894,902 $ 3,251 ,667 $ 3,963,480 50,000 AFY prod. $ 37.90/AF $65.00/AF $79.00/AF Annual O&M $ 8,179,157 $12,200,222 $12,850,619 MF & RO $163.60/AF $244.00/AF S257.00/AF Nit./Denit. at CSDOC as part of secondary expansion $ 50/AF $ 50/AF $ 50/AF Engineer's Report, EIR, Pre-design & final design, Operating plan, etc. $ 5/AF $ 5/AF $ 5/AF Total Cost/AF $ 339/AF $ 446/AF $ 4731AF 18 D RA � � ' APPENDIX D Wastewater Reclamation Policy Statement It is the joint policy of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) and Orange County Water District (OCWD) to develop wastewater reclamation within the districts' service areas, to the maximum practicable extent, considering individual project economic feasibility and the long term need for a dependable water supply to help meet the managed needs within the districts' service areas. To accomplish this objective, the districts will for those programs and projects approved by our Boards of Directors: • Acquire appropriate and feasible reclamation sites. • Plan, design, construct and operate projects for the reclamation and reuse of wastewater. • Develop programs to inform the public of the role of wastewater reclamation as an integral part of the areas' dependable water supplies. • Establish and encourage district and city sewer use ordinances that limit salinity and other critical water quality constituents discharged into wastewater collection systems to facilitate wastewater reclamation. • Pursue state and federal financial assistance to reduce the financial burden on the districts' rate payers for developing reclamation projects. • Establish and encourage retail water pricing that promotes water reuse. 19 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS M ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 9 10114C ELL19<VEMIF PC 9D.9127 RMWA1N VW Y.GLIFOPNIA 92IM4127 n1a19F2x.. RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS NOVEMBER 10, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. Y FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/30/93 PAGE I REPORT NUMBER AP93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 30/L6/93 POSTING DATE 14/06/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132693 ADCOA $52.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS 232694 AS TECH COMPANY 356.716.h7 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 132695 AMERICAN TELEPHONE L TELEGRAPH 31.256.88 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 132696 A T L 1 3261.56 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 132697 ACADLMIC PRESS $89.78 PUBLICATION 132698 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $119.76 SAFETY SUPPLIES 232699 AIR PRODUCTS 6 CHEMICAL IN 317.432.UC OAR AGREEMENT DAY GEN. SYST M.0.8-9-89 132760 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 1172.48 ASPHALT a 132101 ALTA - ROb8INS 1153.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES m 132702 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH 375.Ju ALARM SYSTEM REPAIRS Z 132703 KETEMA INC 31.113.16 MECHANICAL PARTS Ly 132704 AMICON. INC 3b17.29 LAB SUPPLIES n 132705 ANAHEIM SAW SHOP INC $134.19 TOOL PARTS 132706 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL 1415.06 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 132707 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 32.217.0C NOTICES 6 ADS TIT 132708 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS INC 5970.50 LAB SUPPLIES 3 132709 ABC LABORATORIES $1.395.06 I" SERVICES 132710 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC 41.335.21 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132711 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC 35.15C.6U WASTE HADLIMG FEE 132712 ASHBROOK - SIMON HARTLEY SS.727.75 TEST UNIT 1 132713 RANDOLPH AUS71N CO s630.8L LAB SUPPLIES n 232724 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING $3,933.56 PAYROLL SERVICES r 132715 AUTOMATION CONTROLS $1,100.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS f— 132716 ORR LANDFILL 14,108.55 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.30-9-91 132717 BRW SAFETY L SUPPLY $173.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES YJ 132718 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS S7:.V6 PUBLICATION N 132719 BASIC MEASURING INST. $391.93 INSTRUMENT PARTS 232720 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $7.46 BATTERIES A 132721 6AUER COMPRESSOR 186.h9 COMPRESSOR PARTS 132722 BARTER OIAb NOSTICS INC 38.866.0. LAB SUPPLIES C7 132723 RIG TEA TRAILERS 31029.28 N 132724 BIONLRIEUK VITLK INC $524.48 PWORBTASBUPeL14E8IPMENT 132725 810 TECH NET, INC $1.2h SERVICE AGREEMENT 132726 BLACK L VEATCH 321.914.87 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.7-14-93 132727 BLOOMBERG L.P. 14.913.43 FINANCIAL MONITOR M.0.4-14-93 132T28 BOISE CASCADE DEC PRODUCTS $4,601.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132729 bON-A-RUES $232.33 TRUCK PARTS 332730 BRCNNCR-FIEpLER L ASSOC 1N 172.30 LAB BUPPLI68 132731 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC $7.196.G: SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 132732 C M 1 1108.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132733 CS COMPANY $3,270.01 VALVES 132734 CRTC-CWPCA INC 5760.66 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 132735 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO INC 5237.69 CHEMICALS 132736 CALTROL INC 3h2.13 MECHANICAL PARTS 132737 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $465.17 SERVICE AGREEMENT 132738 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS s327.769.18 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38, J-33 ri n FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST YORRIN6 CAPITAL - PROCESSING DATE 9/30/93 PAGE 2 N REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID IE/06/93 POSTING &ATE IG/06/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132139 CASHCO $491.60 VALVES 132740 CEILCOTE ST,700.06 FAN 132141 CENTRETOIN7 COMMERCIAL ENT 3,217.69 OFFICE FURNITURE 132742 CCNTURY SAFETY INST R SUPP a1.9B2.85 SAFETY SUPPLIES 132743 COLE-PARXEA INSTRUMENT CO S1.586.25 LAB SUPPLIES 132744 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $695.GG MECHANICAL REPAIRS 132745 COMPUTER DATALOM 32.656.36 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 132746 COMPUSA. INC. f20.8.10 COMPUTER SOFTWARE n 132747 CONNELL GM PARTS A DIV a204.98 TRUCK PARTS 132710 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL Dlii fiG.285.61 Z ELECTRIC SUPPLIER 132749 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC Sb29.90 TOOLS t% 132750 COhTINCNTAL CHEMICAL C0 54.B48.75 a INB N.O.10-9-91 132751 CONTRACTOR-S BOOK STORE $222.50 BOOKS BOOKS 132753 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS O L i91.551.44 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9 m 132754 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC s1.551.44 ENGINB PARTS ETT 132155 COSTA CORP. i$60.O3 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 3 132755 COSTA MESA AUTO SUF PLT 346.96 TRUCK PARTS qu 13275E COSTAR CORPCOULTER $346.9E LAB AL EQUIPMENT 00 132758 R E COULTER CRANE RENTAL $2.890.06 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 132759 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC f2$363.09 FITTINGS PARTS 1 132766 J.Y. DSAh TIRO CO INC a1G3.69 FITTINGS Y 132761 DAMPERS TIRE SERVICE a135.25 TIRES r 132762 DAPPER TIRE f1$312.99 OTIRES FFICE t— 132762 DATRON PERT PXEM AL 3312.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132764 - DEPENDABLE 3441.2E GAUGE 132765 DEPENDABLE OFF-READ S $223.99 TRUCK PARTS N 132765 DIGITAL I'0 ASSOCIATES .898.17 PRINTING —� 13276E DIGITAL EBU IP hENi CORP S13.104.6. OFFICE EQUIPMENT .� 132768 DISCO CORP, $102.31 FREIGHT 132769 DISCO PRINT ROMPPNT 5142.31 OFFICE SUPPLIER C6 232710 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN 5150.2E ELECT WASTE DISPOSAL N 132771 DORAD ELECTRIC INC 5171277.26 ELECTRIC SERVICES 132772 ROBERT EDRIVERISES INC 319.150.0E PLANT MAINTENANCE R REPAIAE 132773 ROBERT F DRIVER ORY S2.011.00 INSURANCE UP ADMINISTRATOR 132774 DUNN EDSALES CORE a215.43 PAINT SUPPLIES 232775 ESVALS SAKES $222.49 FITTINGS 132775 ESP NORTH 3222.49 TOOLS 13277E EAGLE DISTRIBUTING $342.65 HARDWARE SUPPLIES 132778 EASTMANDWARDS INCIV. $5.605.30 OFFICE UPLIE 132779 ENCHAN$ DIV. 0f 6S BL06 SYS. 55.005.30 MACHINE SUPPLIES 1-278C ENCHANTER INC 45.606.00 OCEAN MONITORING N.O.6-10-92 13270E ENVIRE3 $1.916.03 MECHANICAL PARTS 132782 ENVIRONETICS# INC a3.924.13 - LAB SUPPLIES 1-2783 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC S317.16 LAB SERVICES 13278] ESSENCE GROUP s436.84 I EQUIPMENT 1]2701 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICR sA RESIDUALS 600.6E RESIDUDU ALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 t 1 N 1 P .. n FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST NCRkIN6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9130/93 PAGE 3 W REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1G/06/93 PU57146 DATE 10/06/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132765 FAX PRESS s52.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132796 FEDERAL EXPRESS CURD $1.387.5L AIR FREIGHT 132767 FEkRELLGAS s6b.IL PROPANE 132788 CHEMVEST INC il..L4.75 BUILDING SUPPLIES 132789 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO 14.759.47 CHLORINATION PARTS 132790 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 3390.b4 LAB SUPPLIES 132791 FISONS INSTRUMENTS s102.23 LAB SUPPLIES 132792 FLU-SYSTEMS 92.9b6.61 PUMP PARTS a 132793 FOSS ENVIRONMENTAL f93.5♦ FREIGHT Cl 132794 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 4163.92 PILM m 132795 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 914,276.57 ;mLATER USAGE ty 132797 THE FUXBORO CO s326.22 OFFICE PARTS 132798 GB T. E L 1e•b13.22 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132799 GENERA LUMBER CO 552.35 LUMBER 132799 GENERAL BINDING CARP s2C9.75 -i OFFICE SUPPLIES m 132800 GENERAL ELECTRIC SURFORAT ION 356.374.00 CONSTRUCTION LIES 3 132803 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $465.71 TELEPHONE SUPPLIES 00 1328C2 GENERAL TELEPHONE CU ..56.71 TELEPHONE SERVICES 1328 C3 61EP LIC H-MIiCNELI INC 16.:56.d9 OO MECHANICAL PARTS 132863 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $241.44 PHOTOGRAPHIC BUPPLIE3 1 132805 GRAPH CPADOMPANY f247.44 _ COMPUTER 9OFTNARE )D 132807 HALM CUNV ANT 383.57 LAB SUPPLIES r 13200S HATCH s CORN INC sl]7.09 TOOLS r 1328C8 PL ARNN Co INC 13.665.75 ELECTRIC PARTS 132SC9 HELL AEO INDL STRAINER/MARINE 1q$160.06 MECHANICAL PARTS C7 132811 HELLO s169.06 OPFICE EQUIPMENT N 132812 HILTI INC s682.5C - TOOLS � 312812 XACF[E SCIENTIFIC INSTR. f1•18).92 LAB BUpPLI68 132813 HOLMES s NARYER INC $47,559.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-44 132814 RS HUGHES CO INC s882.L4 PAINT SUPPLIES 132815 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $21,983.24 13281b HUNTINGTON UEACH NUMBER STA 171.84 OFFICEPERMIT FEES N 132817 HUNTINGTON YALLET TOOL $132.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES TOOLS 132819 HVDAACOTOM1 VALLEY SCNVINN C f102.91 BICYCLE PARTS 13282C IMPERIAL COMPANY sb3i.71 LAB SUPPLIES 131821 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL i32$241.29 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-IB-92 132822 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 4197.65 CONNECTORS :52822 INFILDU DE6RCMOIIT . INC s19).49 FREIGHT 132823 INGRAM PAPER 140.6E 132824 META s140.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES BOOR 132926 INTERSTATE WESTERN kY SYSTEMS $900.65 JANITORIAL 132827 GROAT ANDSCAP G INC PI SUFP s940.65 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES CE 132628 JAPAN LANDSCAPING INC s500$374.00 LANDSCAPING SERVICES E 132629 JEM•S CATERING f3T4.97 DIRECTORS' PARTING EXPENSES 132836 JENSEN TH COMPANIES CO 33.605.46 INSTRUMENT GINEERIN PARTS J203G THE NEI TH COMPANIES i898.15 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-36R a 1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKINU CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/33/93 PAGE 4 r REPORT NUN tlE0. AP93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAW PAID PAID 30/06I 9J POSTING DATE 30/46/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132831 KIMMERLE BROS INC s433.72 MECHANICAL PARTS 132832 KING BEARING INC $1,638.34 MACHINE SUPPLIES 132833 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 31.601.31 HARDWARE 132834 L.A.S. INCORPORATED Y984.b4 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132835 LA CLLLULAR TELEPHONE CO $69.81 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 132836 LAYMAN. JGNES > UTE. LAWYERS s3.59Y.60 LEGAL SERVICES H.0.5-13-92 132637 LAYTON INTERNATIONAL 3z.101.13 COMPUTER SOFTWARE Y 232838 LSBOUEF COMPANY INC 324.669.LG PUMP STATION ABANDONMENT - RED HILL m 132839 LEE S RO CONSULTING ENGR 35:.384.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5 Z 132840 SUCO-LYNCH CORP $712.76 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES t7 132841 NPS s320.hG PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES n 132842 MACOMCO 3B59.T8 SERVICE AGREEMENT 132943 MAG SYSTEMS $4.2".32 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132844 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION INC 3452,372.69 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2 fTl 132845 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 1116.37 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 3 132046 MATT - CHLOR INC 46.448.5h 132847 0 A HATTHEWS L ASSOCIATES 34.23s.i5 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 132840 RETINA 1144.51 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 00 MECHANICAL PARTS 132649 MIDWAY MFG 6 MACHINING s5..55.W0 PUMP PARTS 1 132850 MILLIPORE CORP/WATERS CHROMA D 1146.16 LAB SUPPLIES 132851 MISSION INDUSTRIES 33.993.23 UNIFORM RENTALS 132852 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL INC - >128.23 f— PUBLICATION 1— 132653 MOORE INDUSTRIES 3384.91 ELECTRIC PARTS 132854 MOTOROLA INC - 3370.37 PAGER RENTALS O 132855 NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS 41.C25.15 BOOKS N 132856 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC $1.125.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE 132857 MEAL SUPPLY CO $387.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES A 132858 CITY OF MiMPORT BEACH $4.79 WATER USAGE 132959 DX SYSTEMS CO 335.I43.09 CHLORINE M.0.11-18-92 f7 132960 ORACLE CORFORATION 4968.94 COMPUTER SOFTWARE N 132861 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO FARTS C $137.55 - TRUCK PARTS 132862 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO $1,921.79 CHEMICALS 132863 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY C $808.13 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 132864 ORANGE COUNTY WHOLESALE 31.168.62 ELECTRIC PARTS 132665 ORANGE COURIEN $267.00 FREIGHT 132866 ORANGE VALVE S FIRING CO. 31,223.51 FITTINGS 132667 OXYGEN SERVICE f1.442.30 SPECIALTY GASES 132866 P6C SCIENTIFICS CORPORATION $56.29 LAB SUPPLIES 132869 P R L LABS .144.3CSUPPLIES LAB PUBLICATION 132871 PACIFIC FSAFETYERS 299.00 PUBLICATION 132872 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CU $1.299.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES 132873 PACIFIC WALK-IN $126.06 TELEPHONE SSRVICSS 132674 PACIFIC WALK-IN MEDICAL .689.44 MEDICAL EXAMS 132875 PADRE N CABLPI AL SUPP >3.$36.76 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 132876 PARAGON CABLE 691.07 CABLE BERVICEB 172B7b PARAMOUNT TANK INC f691.U1 TRUCK PARTS Y 1 r u n FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/30/93 PAGE 5 111 REPORT NUMBER AP93 ` COUNTY CLAI SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAWS PAIL 14/06/93 POSTING OAIL 10/46/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132277 PARTS UNLIMITED *369.56 TRUCK PARTS 132878 PASCAL A LUDWIG 339.097.8C CONSTRUCTION J-32 132879 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $126.742.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 132880 PITNEY BOWES CREDIT -CORP 5283.18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 132891 POLVPURE INC A".887.71 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 132882 POLYSPEOE S50.b3 ELECTRIC PARTS 132883 POSTAGE BY PHONE 35.CGG.04 POSTAGE 132864 POWER ELEClAO SUPPLY CO 3396.72 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES n 132885 POWER SYSTEMS f2.992.32 TRUCK PARTS n' 132896 PREMIUM CONNECTING POINT $569.88 m OFFICE MACHINE Z 132887 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE a929.04 IC@ CJ 132089 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. f5.200.40 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 Y 232889 QUANTUM CHEMICAL USI DIY. 5122.24 LAB SUPPLIES 132896 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES INC 164.843.14 COMPUTER SERVICES 132691 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS 4120.01 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS m 132892 R A R INSTRUMENTS $1,651.54 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 3 132893 RAXC4 INC 55.300.19 COMPUTER SOFTWARE LICENCE 132894 - RD SYSTEMS INC SL.Bi5.59 SECURITY SYSTEM - CARD READER 00 132895 RED LION INN s200.56 TRAINING REGISTRATION 232896 MCJUNKIN-REFUBLIC SUPPLY f2.261.e5 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 132897 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CORP 5602.28 LAB SUPPLIES a 132898 RESTER CORP $133.88 LAB SUPPLIES r 132699 ROCCO-S TRUCK WRECKING 5215.54 TRUCK PARTS t— 132900 ROSEMOUNT INC. $952.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS C 132901 ROSEN04NT ANALYTICAL 5199.72 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1329 G2 JOSE PH T RYEAR ON A SON IN 31.53b.68 METAL Uf 132903 SPC (SYNERGISTIC PERT. CORP) 5123.75 LAB SUPPLIES 1 132904 SANCON ENGINEERING INC s9DO.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 132905 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLAS71CS $3.574.76 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1329CE DOUG SARVIS f375.00 Cl CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING Cn 132908 SCIENTIFIC ELECTRONICS SCRY. 51.947.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS N 132909 SEIMED K CORP S156.378.12 LAB OFFICE FURNITURE 132916 SEA COAST DESIGNS f:%693.12 OFPICB FURNITOR6 132911 SHAMROCK SUPPLY .342.81 PAINT SUPPLIES 132912 SHURELU CN WALK-IN f8.392.81 MECHANICAL PARTS 132912 SOUTHER WALK-IM MEDICAL Cll .455.15 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 132914 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON CO 525.955.45 POKER 132915 SO CAL GAS CO 515.658.95 NATURAL GAS 132916 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL Cu s13.999.98 DIEBEL/UNLEADED FUEL 132927 GESTALL OY INC $1.395.T9 PELTING SUPPLIES 132918 6ANT G STRCCD f3.622.31 PETTY CASH RBIMB., TRAVEL 6 TRAINING 132919 SUN ELECTRIC GORY s388.12 TRUCK PART 232920 SUPER ICE CORP s$93.90 CHEMICALS 132920 SUPER ICE COMP s9 b9U ICE 132921 MANILA TALEBI $899.94 LIABILITY CLAIM 132922 TAILOR-DUNN MIS COMPANY $222.85 ELECTRIC CART PARTS ri CT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINb DATE 9/36/93 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY CLAI SANITATION PAID10/ DISTRICTS OF ODATEC COUNTY 0/0619 CLAIMS PAID 30/p6/93 P0511NG GATE 10/06/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132923 THEODORE ROBBINS FORD $7.431.b6 TRUCE PARTS 132924 CHARLES E THOMAS $1.947.52 TRUCK PARTS 132925 TDLEDO SCALE CORP. $930.b0 SERVICE AGREEMENT 132926 TONT•S LOCK a SAFE SERVICE 5234.9• LOCKS A KEYS 132927 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES a318.uu TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.7-14-93 132928 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY INC $17.74 TRUCK PARTS 132929 JG TUCKER 8 SON INC 5760.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS Y 132930 US AUTO GLASS CENTERS $346.75 TRUCK PARTS m 132931 UVP. INC a6.LO6.4. COMPUTER SOFTWARE 132932 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC S55L..4 Z LAB SUPPLIES 132933 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $257.02 PARCEL SERVICES n 132934 UNITED TAPE CORPORATION $42.91 VIDEO SUPPLIES 132935 VYM SCIENTIFIC a3.248.17 LAB SUPPLIES 13293b VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 52.637.G3 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 132937 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $3.543.52 fTl OFFICE SUPPLIES 132938 VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC $18,610.35 3 LAB SUPPLIEB 132940 VERTEX SYSTEMSPLUMBIN $687.35 - # 132940 VERTEX SYSTEMS a39p.0t PLUMBING DATA SUP 132941 K.H. WATTS CO $163.77 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 1 132942 WEATHER AND WINO INSTRUMENT 4799.01 SAFETY PARTS FETY SUPPLIES ELECTRIC 132943 WESTERN 57ATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 530.000.96 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 n 132944 WESCO 5988.23PART C r 132945 VITC6 $353.42 PLAB PSUPPLIES 132946 ROURKE S WOODRUFF 8 SPRAULIN abi.115.87 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 C7 132947 XEROX CORP 5183.80 COPIER LEASES Co 132946 GEORGE IAROLEY CO a1.791.9L INSTRUMENT PARTS 132949 YELLOW SPRINGS INSTRUMENT C 432.97 METER PARTS 132950 IIESARTH S ALFLR/C.S. ALPER 318C.979.46 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 �.. ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PA10 14/L6/93 a2.203.517.84 a V FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/30/93 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/06/93 POSTING DATE 10/06/93 SUMMARY - AMOUNT 01 OPEN FUND $103.60 02 OPEN FUND $157.99 02 CAP FAC FUND $2,812.00 03 OPEN FUND $37,945.19 n 03 CAP FAC FUND $6,404.73 05 OPER FUND $1,202.75 m 05 CAP FAC FUND $2,197.70 m 06 OPEN FUND $42.75 n 07 OPER FUND $2,453.51 07 CAP FAC FUND $24,669.00 011 OPEN FUND $83.15 011 CAP FAC FUND $355.50 m 05A6 OPEN FUND $3,017.87 16$7 OPER FUND $3,297,02 4h 07A14 OPEN FUND $1,255.76 00 JT OPEN FUND $539,521.98 CUNT $1,437,804.25 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $4,070.44 n JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $135,522.65 r- ______________ r' $2,203,517.84 N 1 (7 ri V FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/93 PAGE 1 �-' REPORT NUMBER AP43 CGUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS RAID 10/26/93 POSTING DATE 10/26/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132983 AS TECH COMPANY $5G.957.93 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 132984 AST RESEARCH 51.547.9B REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 132985 A T G T $299.46 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 132986 AARON BROTHERS ART MARTS 580.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132961 ACLU-LABS RESEARCH INC $440.60 . LAB SERVICES 132989 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORF $22.873.72 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.11-18-92 132989 AOVANSTAR EXPOSITIONS $310.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION M.0.7-14-93 n 132990 AIR PRODUCTS 8 CHEMICAL IN $17,432.00 CAN AGREEMENT OEY GEN GIST M.0.8-9-89 !a7 232991 AMERICAN DATA CORP. A1G6.58 COMPUTER SOFTWARE m 132992 AMERICAN METAL BEARING CO $216.86 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ZC 132993 AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTN $101.75 LAB SUPPLIES n 132999 ANALYSTS INC F1.65O.OL MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 132995 ANDERSEN SAMPLER CO 54.651.5G ELECTRIC PARTS 132996 ANIXTER - DISTRIBUTION 52.948.4i OFFICE EQUIPMENT --1 132997 ANTHUNV•S RICH 8 MACHINE. INC. 5306.72 MECHANICAL REPAIRS m 132998 A-PLUS SYSTEMS G635.54 NOTICES 6 ADS 132999 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS INC $606.86 LAB SUPPLIES - # 133000 ABC LABORATORIES $235.66 LAB SERVICES Oo 1330CI ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $148.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS 133002 ARMOR - VAC 4360.60 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 133003 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC 44050.Z6 WASTE HAULING y 133004 ANSA $350.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION M.0.7-14-93 T- 133005 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO $230.63 LAB SUPPLIES f- 133006 AUTOMATION CONTROLS S492.48 INSTRUMENT PARTS C 133007 AWARDS S TROPHIES $64.43 AWARD PLAQUES 133000 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 5127.36 LAB SUPPLIES (n 133009 BFI PORTABLE SERVICES 5166.65 RENTAL EQUIPMENT __q 233010 BMK LANDFILL $3,746.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 133011 BRW SAFETY A SUPPLY $926.43 SAFETY SUPPLIES n 233012 BANANA BLULPRINT 599U76.38 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES --1 133013 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $747.61 BATTERIES N 233014 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 54.004.78 LAB SUPPLIES 133015 BEHR PROCESS CORP $424.89 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 133016 J e H BERGE INC 5479.12 LAB SUPPLIES 133617 BEST WESTERN SANTA ANA $2.011.56 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 133010 SIOMERIEUA VITEK INC $44:.64 LAB SUPPLIES 133019 BID VENTURES INC S162.LG LAB SUPPLIES 233026 BLOOMBERG L.P. $38U.79 FINANCIAL MONITORING M.O. 4-14-93 133021 BON-A-RUES $328.86 TRUCK PARTS 133622 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP 4103,909.45 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-17, 7-18, 7-19 333023 BNI BOOKS 5271.70 PUBLICATION 233024 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE S241.34 PUBLICATION 133025 6UREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS $375.56 SUBSCRIPTION 133026 C M I SS.U66.2: METER 133027 IS COMPANY S7G.67 VALVE 133026 CALTBGL INC 51.575.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS w � s - OC FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/93 FAGS 2 N REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 14/26/93 POSTING DATE 16126/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 133029 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC SATE $179.63 SERVICE AGREEMENT 133030 CALIFORNIA SUPRESSION SYSTEM $800.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 133031 CASHCO 1803.10 VALVE PARTS 133033 CEOKO ELECTRONICS S1r20L.04 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 133034 CEILCOTC a271.76 ELECTRIC FAN 133035 CENTURY SAFETYTECHNOLOGIES INST a SUPP a2G.tl40.29 SAFETY SUPPLIES 133035 CE7AC TECHNOLOGIES INC a5B6.41 LAB SUPPLIES 233036 COAST PNEUMATICS Slia.39 ELECTRIC PARTS y 133037 COASTAL COMMUNITIES HOSPITAL $2,948.87 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT G7 13303E COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO s134.93 LAB SUPPLIES TIT 233039 COLICH AND SONS a273r2e1.60 Z 133040 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA a1.695.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-37-4 O PUMP PARTS y 133042 COMPUTER FLOORS. INC 51.995.06 FLOORING INSTALLATION 2330A2 COMPUTER INC. a1.619.12 COMPUTER SOFTWARE m 233044 CONSOLIDAE Si12.95 COMPUTER SERVICES 1J30M CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST s12r907.32 3 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 233046 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO $77.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES i33047 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC f17.9O TOOLS 00 133048 CONTINENTAL CONSULTANTS CO 33.729.43 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 I33049 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS D C f3.719.9J GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES M.O.7-17-91 1 133058 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC s22$562.30 ELECTRIC PARTS 133051 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLYELECTRIC ,306.42 TRUCK PARTS Y 233052 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $l.]06.91 ELECTRIC PARTS f— 333052 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY Sld.202.33 r 133053 STATE BOARD OF 000ILIZATION S'`BABY` RESEARCH GRANT M.O.11-13-91 C7 133054 J.Y. O•ANSELO CO INC UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK TARES $1,260.60 PIPING SUPPLIES N 133055 DAPPER TIRE 5979.i5 TRUCK PARTS 133056 PETER C DAVID CO S28Ir970.04 133057 OE ANZA CORPORATION a150.00 CONSTRUCTION 7-20 133058 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $149.13 EQUIPMENT RENTALS y 133059 DEZURIR AND/OR CS CO 62.JS 0.12 LAB SUPPLIES 133060 DIALOG INFORMATION SERVICES 475.00 VALVES N COMPUTER SOFTWARE 133062 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $1,215.O5 CHEMICALS 133063 DIFILIP PO ASSOCIATES f2 r215.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES 133064 STDGN CORP $229.bG OFFICE MACHINE 133065 DONEE ELECTRICA1 ON NEWS .604.00 ELECTRIC S ADS 133066 DORAD ELECTRIC INC a2.60s.93 ELECTRIC PARTS 133067 DOVERD ENTERPRISESVATOCOMPANY INC $820.06 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 133069 DOPER ELEVATOR COMFANT 6561.04 1]7068 DRESSER ME AS UR tM ENT a561.55 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE METER 133070 DUNN EOWNEDS CORP 5635.59 PAINT SUPPLIES 133071 EDP NORTHtENGINEEKIN6 DESIGN AVT01 S6.291.81 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 133071 ESP AG NORTH a1.522.52 SAFETY BUPPLIE9 133073 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING UTING a179.72 OFFICE 133074 EBERHAR INC aJ.$64.91 OFFICE BUPPLIEe IJ]079 EBER NARD EQUIPMENT f69.91 TRUCK PARTS to FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/93 PAGE 3 W REPORT NUMBER APK] COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUhTY CLAIMS PA IV 14/24/93 POSTING OATE 10/10/is/9/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 133075 ECOANALTSIS INC $7.196.47 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.1-13-93 133076 EONAROS DIV. OF SS BLDG $VS. $153.UO REPAIR MATERIALS 133077 ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHING s194.31 BOOKS 133878 ENCHANTER INC $5.040.06 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 133479 ESSCO PUMPS AND CONTROLS 11.137.04 PUMP PARTS 133080 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC 4149.54 LAB SUPPLIES 133001 ESSENCE GROUP 62.270.36 OFFICE EQUIPMENT n 133082 FST SAND AND GRAVEL INC 92J6.21 ROAD RASE 133083 MARSHALL FAIRRES $78.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION m 133004 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $10.918.84 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.10-9-91 Z 133085 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP sbi1.54 AIR FREIGHT n 133086 FERRELLGAS $27.29 PROPANE 133087 FISCHER b PORTER CO 42,335.27 CHLORINATION PARTS 133080 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO s2.935.b1 9 133089 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $249.91 TRAINING SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PPLI88 3 133091 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $561.4D LAB SUPPLIES 133092 FLU-STSTCMS S3B2.71 PUMP INATB 00 133093 FORCEAXILS INC s143.51 CHLORINATION SUPPLI68 OO 133093 FORCE MF6 CO.. INC 512.60 OFPICS REPAIRS 133095 CLIFFORDFOUNTAIN A TORMENT A $6$126.37 SURVEYING 86RVICBH M.0.6-10-92 1 133696 FOUNTAIN FOUNTAIN CAMERA 5125.J7 PALM n 133W96 FCITYOUR OF FOUNTAIN WALLET 1508.34 WATER USE P— 133097 FOUNTAIN VALLEY LR FAINT $5.19b.39 PAINT SUPPLI89 f— 133099 GATT OF iWLLER ION $191.73 WATER USE t7 133100 GSM. INC. s1$425.02 PRINTING 133101 GANANL LUMBER CO sisi.02 LUMBER y 133102 GAUGE REPAIR MANSERVICE COMPANY $836.12 CHEMICALS � 131102 GAUGE REPAIR SERVICE SB3S.12 GAUGES ' A 133103 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO S13.309.U2 ELECTRIC SNITCHGEAR REPAIRS f") 133104 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. s164.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 133105 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $9.590.37 TELEPHONE SERVICES C/0 133106 GIERLICH-MIICHELL INC i16.015.bb MECHANICAL PARTS 133107 N GLANTZ 0 SON 3165.81 PAINT SUPPLIES 133108 GOODWAY TOOLS CORP. $1.784.96 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 133109 BRASSY S.T.I. s1.UT7.11 METER 133210 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 912,770.00 CONTRACTOR'S (DOA) TM LIEN 133111 HS TYPE 6 GRAPHICS STO.06 PRINTING 133112 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 45.704.89 MECHANICAL PARTS 133113 HAESTAD METHODS $135.00. COMPUTER sOPTNARE 133114 FRED A HARPER S1.500.G0 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 133115 HATCH a KIRK INC $577.64 ENGINE PARTS 133116 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS s1.6S0.04 CONTAINER RENTALS 133117 PL HAWN CO INC .916.99 FILTERS 133110 HEWLETT PACKAKO s1.390.36 SERVICE AGREEMENT 133119 HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY st50.41 LAB SUPPLIES 133126 HILTI INC $2.749.99 TOOLS W 1 W t, I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 14/13/93 FACE 9 F. REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1G/20/93 POSTING DATE 1D/20/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 133121 HOERSIGER CVS CALIF INC $121.24 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 133122 AS HUGHES CC INC S990.72 PAINT SUPPLIES 133123 RODNEY HUNT CO S334.57 FREIGHT 133124 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 119.75 WATER USE 133125 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA $22.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES 233126 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL a32.153.78 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 133127 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS S815.46 CONNECTORS n 133128 INGRAM PAPER $424.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 133129 INTEGRATED SEPARATION SYS. 61.078.73 LAB SUPPLIES m 133130 IRVINE RANCH PATER DISTRICT $678.74 WATER USE Z 133131 J.S.B. ENGINEERING a7r557.55 t:lENGINEERING SERVICES 133132 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP $717.81 a JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 133133 JAVAIO CONTRACTORS INC s71.182.30 CONSTRUCTIONNPZ-23- 2-23-5-1 13313 JS CATERING $ . DIRECTORS' HEETINO EXPENSES 133135 JENSEN INTRUMENTS CO $50.61m INSTRUMENT PARTS 3 133136 JIMrS SUSPENSION SERVICE $55.00 TRUCE REPAIRS 133137 JOHNS70ME SUPPLY $1.581.65 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES # 133138 JONES CHEMICALS INC S2 µC0.74 CHEMICALS 00 133139 MARS. ADVANCED MATERIALS INC $6,000.00 ENGINE REPAIRS 133140 KETEMA/ROOAN slla 23 I REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 233141 MINX BEARING INC 1589.90 FITTINGS Da 133142 MN OS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES S19596.67 TOOLS f 133244 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO 5596.67 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES r 1]3144 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL s970.GW OCEAN MONITORING ty 133145 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $11.69 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 233146 MATT - CHLOR INC $492.66 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES Cn 13314T MENTRIA CORP $861.25 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 133148 MIDWAY MFG G MACHINING 39.944.13 MACHINE REPAIRS 133149 MISSION INDUSTRIES 42,538.74 UNIFORM RENTALS n 133150 MONTGOMERY VATSUB $347.37 ENGINEERING SERVICES -1 133152 NATIONAL PENTSAFETY A FENCE CO S115.77 FENCING RENTAL N 133153 NATIONAL $SFEIT COUNCIL S355.00 MEMBERSHIP SUES 133154 NATIONAL SAKI TART SUPPLY 9109.64 JANITORIAL BUPPLIE3 133155 . HEAL SUPPLY CO a1.227.97 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 133156 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CCNTC 3119.40 TRAINING SUPPLIES M.0.7-14-93 133157 NORLAROFFICE INC 31.337.60 LAB OFFICE FURNITURE 133156 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR pE5 $512.90 OFFICE FURNITURE 233159 THE OHMAMS CORP .297.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS 233260 OS SYSTEMS CO $311197.T5 CHLORINE M.0.11-18-92 133261 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C 8354.66 TRUER PARTS 133162 ORANGE COURIER FARM SUPPLY C S1r U33.39 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 3]3162 ORANGE CDU 0.1Cp 1133.50 FREIGHT 133163 ORANGE VALVE S FITTING CO. $1,989.79 FITTINGS 133164 ONITER CORP $693.64 MACHINE SUPPLIES 133165 OSCARrS LOCK S SAFE s103.67 REY9/LOCRS 133166 COUNTY OF ORANGE J WAYNE AIRPO 3113.485.6L SEWER REPAIRS M.0.9-8-93 W W FUND NO 9199 - JT OIS1 WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING NUM ERTE 30/13/93 EASE 5 R 0EFORT4NII NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 16/20/93 POSTING DATE 30/21/9J WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 133167 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $26,621.06 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 133168 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRIC $342.465.00 OAP WATER M.0.6-9-93 133169 PGC SCIENTIFICS CORPORATION $112.91 LAB SUPPLIES 133170 P R L LABS $1.090.00 LAB SUPPLIES 133171 PSOC(POOL SUPPLY OF OCT $96.46 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 133172 PS3I $4.509.51 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 133173 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY 31.446.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES y 133174 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO S831.63 SAFETY SUPPLIES 133175 PACIFIC BELL 914.32 TELEPHONE SERVICES m 133176 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $7.734.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT 233177 PADRE JANITORIAL SUMP S6.13b.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ]a 133178 PAGE NE1 396.04 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 133179 PARKSON CORPORATION 66.bD3.79 MECHANICAL PARTS 133280 PARTS UNLIMITED S446.23 TRUCK PARTS --4 133181 PASCAL S LUDWIG $206,311.30 CONSTRUCTION P2-43-1 T71 133182 ROT PENDEPGRAFT S460.00 3 137183 PEPKIN-FEWER CORiOP AT IOh 31.4T4.Y9 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION LAB SUPPLIES 4k 13318% JE PHILLIPS CO INC $244.21 ELECTRIC PARTS 00 133185 PIMA 6RO SYSTEMS INC $133,974.63 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 1 113186 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE 47U.6B HARDWARE 133187 POLYPURE INC a16.767.72 y 133188 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO S421.43 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 r 133189 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 621.UC INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES r TOE 133190 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. 1457.32 133191 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY 183.73 BOIL TESTING d 133 192 RIM ELECTRIC NOT085 $425.61 BUILDING MATERIALS ELECTRIC PARTS VI 133193 R 8 R INSTRUMENTS $01.57 ELECTRIC PARTS 233194 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CD $1,600.21 TRASH REMOVAL A 133195 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO $169.83 LAB EQUIPMENT f") 133196 RED VINE Sh OES 1977.52 SAFETY SHOES --1 133197 BOLT DELIVERY AND/OR 1115.25 FREIGHT Cn 133198 THE REGISTER $355.46 NOTICES 6 ADS 133199 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY S738.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 133200 RESTER CORP 949.97 BOOKS 133201 RYAN-NERCO S4.123.70 1332L2 366 TUBE S183.05 PUMP PARTS REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT 133203 SANTA FE BAG CO 4214.1G 133204 SANTA PE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS S1r152.84 BUILDING MATERIALS 133205 SARTONIUS CORP $109.13 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 133206 DOUG SARVIS a540.DU LAB SUPPLIES 133207 SCHULER ENGINEERING CORP $89.973.94 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING CONSTRUCTION 5-36 32 SCJTT SPECIALTY GASES INC 41.304.24 INSTRUMENT PARTS 233209 09 SEA COAST DESIGNS 551.25 133220 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $255.4, OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS WATER USE 133211 SEA TREE 370G.36 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIBB 133212 SHAMROCK SUPPLY s1r478.61 . TOOLS 00 I 1J7 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/93 PAGE 6 CJT REPORT NUMBER AP43 C W SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS POSTING CLAIMS PAID 10/20/93 PUS7 IN6 DATE 1O/2L/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 133213 SHURELUCK SALES $6.5G5.78 TOOLS 133214 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO 5525.78 LAB SUPPLIES 133225 SMITH PIPE L SUPPLY INC 542,70 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 133216 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP 4473.71 TOOLS 133217 SOIL MOISTURE CORP. &1".72 LAB SUPPLIES 133218 SOLAR TURBINES INCORPORATEU $604.42 ELECTRIC PARTS 133219 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 534r89U,b9 POWER 133220 SO CAL GAS CO $3.796.33 NATURAL GAS 133221 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO $17.469.51 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 133222 SOUTH SHORE WINDOW MAINT. 42,083.34 TIT WINDOW WASHING 88AVICEB Z 13322 SOUVENIR PHOTO $136.62 PHOTO SERVICEB a 33224 STAMEN 2 SPASSO Ff PE fAr6tl O.a0 2 ENGINEERING SERVICES 33225 YCSTALLOT INC 51.234.b5 WELDING SUPPLIES 133226 SPEX INDUSTRIES INC $311.94 LAB SUPPLIES 233227 STERLING ART 593.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 3 133226 GARY 6 $TREED $4.259.bb ggIMB PETTY CASH, TRAVEL S TRAINING 153229 STR ONBERO PRODUCTS SY 4,91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 4t 233230 SUMMIT STEEL $393:29 METAL OO 133231 SUNSET FORD 51.31e TRUCK PARTS 133232 SUPELCO INC $422.70 LAB SUPPLIES 133277 TEXTR ON IX INC 5660.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT y 133234 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 12r DY7.44 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES I— 133235 TMORPE INSULATION 460.67 BUILDING MATERIALS r 133236 3M TELCOMM PRODUCTS UIV $78.79 INSTRUMENT PARTS C 133237 TONI•5 LOCK L SAFE SERVICE 5]0.71 KEYS 133238 TRAN BRATION INC 15390.30 PUMP N 133239 TRINITY CONSULTANTS INC $650.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION M.O.7-14-93 —1 133240 TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY INC S60i,1G TRUCK PARTS 233241 TRUESOAIL LABS 5175.00 LAB SERVICES 133242 JG TUCXER L SON INC $703.98 133243 TUSTIN OOOGE 166,93 INSTRUMENT PARTS K PARTS N 133244 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 5171.00 LAB TRUCSERVICES 233245 US AUTO $LASS CENTERS $387.45 TRUCK PARTS 133246 U.S.C. SPONSORED PROJECTS ACCT 536.593.34 TECHNICAL SERVICES 133247 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $342.06 LAB SUPPLIES 13324E UNOCAL $26.73 UNLEADED GASOLINE 133249 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 9296.26 PARCEL SERVICES 133256 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO S318.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 133251 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $4.555.26 LAB SUPPLIES 133252 VIRTUAL RESEARCH CORP. 91.300.05 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT SERVICES 133253 WATER ENVIRONMENT FED. 5150.0E PUBLICATION 133254 WEATHER AND VINO INSTRUMENT 5548.26 SAFETY SUPPLIES 133255 WEBER NAME PLATE $169.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 133256 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $28,946.43 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 133257 ROURKE A WOODRUFF L SPRADLIN 519,131.25 LEGAL SERVICEB M.O.2-19-92 133258 AEROX CORP $14,655.5. COPIER LEASES l7C T FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST HORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/13/93 PAGE 7 V REPORT HUNGER AP 93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PA CLAIMS PAID 14/20/93 POSTING GATE 10120/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 133259 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $794.89 INSTRUMENT PARTS 133260 2YMARK CORP. 421.55U.40 LAB EQUIPMENT 133261 RICHARD 8 EDGAR S30C.DG DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/20/93 $2,401.100.44 D F'm SUMMARY AMOUNT Z C7 12 OPER FUND 3,586.41 n t3 OPER FUND 17,341.72 /3 CAP FAD FUND 8,250.00 05 OPER FUND 1,787.71 3 85 CAP FAC FUND 90,833.96 86 OPER FUND 41.97 17 OPER FUND 2,360.26 00 t7 CAP PAC FUND 485,111.45 t11 OPEN FUND 7,493.86 E11 CAP FAC FUND 88.63 n t14 OPER FOND 24.91 r t14 CAP FAC FUND 17,116.86 r t566 OPER FUND 1,121.92 Dy i566 CAP PAC FUND 195,071.24 JT OPER FUND 817,406.13 Cn CORF 552,793.20 --i SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FU 26,621.08 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL 174,048.73 n ___________________ --� 2,401,100.04 N OU I V t RESOLUTION NO. 93-143 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN BULK, SPECIFICATION NO. C-030 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN BULK, SPECIFICATION NO. C-030, TO DX SYSTEMS COMPANY ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2 , 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of contract be made to DX Systems Company for Purchase of Chlorine in Bulk, Specification No. C-030, and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposal submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That a Purchase Contract for Specification No. C-030, be awarded to DX Systems Company for the price of $407.70 per ton plus sales tax, furnished and delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor, for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1993 , with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms; and, "C-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS 11C-1" Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign said Purchase Contract with said supplier to supply chlorine pursuant to the specifications and purchase contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said material are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1993. RM143 "C-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS October 15, 1993 0 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MEMORANDUM 10SAA ELLIS AVENUE vo.SOx9127 MUMAIN VALLEY,CALIPoPNIA 92728-8127 f71A1962-2a11 TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager FROM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN BULK SPECIFICATION NO. C-030 sealed bids were opened Tuesday, October 5, 1993, for the purchase and delivery of Chlorine In Bulk for a one-year period, beginning December 1, 1993. Tabulation Of bids Is as follows: Unit Price Vendor Per Ton 1. DX Systems Company $ 407.70 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 2. All Pure Chemical Company $ 450.00 Santa Fe Springs, CA 3. Jones Chemical Company NO BID Torrance, CA 4. Imperial West Chemical Company NO BID Antioch, CA It is recommended the award be made to DX Systems Company, the lowest responsible bidder, for a one-year contract period, starting December 1, 1993. The total estimated annual cost of $815,400.00,Including environmental excise tax, plus all applicable sales tax, Is based on furnishing 2,000 tons at a unit price of S407.70 per ton, including environmental excise tax, plus all applicable sales tax. Provisions are in the specifications for four(4)consecutive one-year contract extensions. Respectful�subm Offm P etl, Cc Ted E. an Purchasing Manager We hereby concur with the above recommendation: alV G. Sttped Robert J. ooten Director of Finance Assistant Director of Operations "C-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-3" RESOLUTION NO. 93-144 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN ONE-TON CYLINDERS, SPECIFICATION NO. C-031 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN ONE-TON CYLINDERS, SPECIFICATION NO. C-031, TO CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL COMPANY +++++tt++t+tttt++++++t++t+++tttt++ The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of contract be made to Continental Chemical Company for Purchase of Chlorine in One-Ton Cylinders, Specification No. C-031, and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposal submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2 . That a Purchase Contract for Specification No. C-031, be awarded to Continental Chemical Company for the price of $345. 00 per ton plus environmental excise tax and sales tax, furnished and delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor, for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1993, with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms; and, "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign said Purchase Contract with said supplier to supply chlorine pursuant to the specifications and purchase contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said material are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1993. RC6.1" "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS October 12, 1993 f ORANGE COUMfY, CAUFORNIA UX44 M-US AVENUE Pa boa e+10 MEMORANDUM wu"ruN vmur.cauwaNu szrzsatz� n+nsezxn TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager FROM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN ONE-TON CYLINDERS SPECIFICATION NO. C-031 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, October 5, 1993, for the purchase and delivery of Chlorine in One-Ton Cylinders, for a one-year period, beginning December 1, 1993. Tabulation of bids is as follows: Supplier Unit Price per Ton 1. Continental Chemical Company $ 345.00 Cincinnati, OH 2. All Pure Chemical Company $ 485.45 Santa Fe Springs, CA 3. Jones Chemical Company $ 500.00 Torrance, CA 4. DX Systems Company $ 529.70 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 5. Imperial West Chemical Company No Bid Antioch, CA It is recommended the award be made to Continental Chemical Company, the lowest responsible bidder, for a one-year period, beginning December 1, 1993. The total estimated cost of $86,250.O0, plus environmental excise tax and all applicable sales tax, is based on furnishing 250 tons at a unit price of $345.00 per ton, plus environmental excise tax and all applicable sales tax. Provisions are in the sp Qr;f�ur (4) con ecutive one-year contract extensions. Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager N:by a recommendation: G. Stye d, Robert J. Ooten, Dieelor of Rharm Assistant Director of Operations "D-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3" Page 1 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER. Contractor: Hunter Corooration C. 0. No.: Twenty-six (26) Date: November 10. 1993 Job: Central Power Generation Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers Amount of this Change Order (Add)(8eduet1 $173,975.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the fallowing changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - EARLY COMPLETION BONUS The contract criteria for Early Completion Bonus as defined in Change Order No. 10, Item 2, was successfully accomplished on June 28, 1993. The Contractor successfully completed the early completion criteria 136 days prior to the required completion/acceptance date of November 10, 1993. The bonus/liquidated damages are $3,000.00 per calendar day. The criteria also stipulated that the Contractor would be eligible for a maximum bonus of $153,000.00 in the event the test was successfully accomplished more than than 51 calendar days before the completion date. The maximum bonus allowance based on 51 days governs over the actual days. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 153,000.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - FINAL RESOLUTION OF PROJECT DISPUTES INCLUDING EXTENDED OVERHEAD COST This item resolves disputes regarding all contractor extended supervision and engineering cost remaining on this contract, field testing of engine/generator equipment, absorption chiller startup and controls, and engine exhaust gaskets. The final period allowed for extended supervision and engineering cost is 21 calendar days from June 19, 1993 through July 9, 1993. All extended supervision and engineering cost incurred by the Contractor after July 9, 1993 are at no cost to the Districts. The Contractor's daily rate for this period is $643.00 per calendar day. The Contractor agrees not to submit any claims related to absorption chiller equipment and controls or for delays to the chiller system startup caused by the Districts. Control Panels Enclosures for both chillers are accepted and hydronic balancing as "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" Page 2 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Hunter Corooration C. O. No.: Twenty-six 126) Date: November 10. 1993 Job: Central Power Generation Systems at Plant No. 1 . Job No. J-19-1 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Consultinc Encineers specified in Detailed Specification 64-9654.2 will be performed by the Districts as a later date. As part of this item, field performance testing of engine/generator equipment (delayed by the engine manufacturer) will be performed by the Districts at a later date and the Districts accept the engine exhaust piping gaskets provided by the Contractor provided no leaks in the exhaust system occur within the contract warranty period. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $13,503.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 59 Calendar Days ITEM 3 - CORRECTION OF COOLING WATER SUPPLY AND COOLING WATER RETURN PIPING This item is relocating the 6-inch cooling water return (CWR) to Chiller No. 2 connection at the 8-inch plant chilled water supply line to a position downstream of the 6-inch cooling water supply (CWS) connection at the 8-inch main from Chiller No. 1. The 6-inch CWR line was incorrectly shown upstream of the 6-inch CWS line on the contract drawings. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO J191-045) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $2,971.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" Page 3 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER. Contractor: Hunter Corporation C. 0. No.: Twenty-six (261 Date: November 10, 1993 Job: Central Power Generation Systems at Plant No. 1 , Job No. J-19-1 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers ITEM 4 - DEMOLITION OF EXISTING HOT WATER PIPING IN TUNNELS This credit is deleting the demolition of all 3-inch and 6-inch hot water supply and return piping as described on Contract Drawing No. 1M17. The Contractor cannot remove this pipe at this time as it is needed to operate the existing blower engines which will not be taken off line until after successful completion of the final engine emission testing. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. CREDIT COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: ($3,062.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5 - ELECTRICAL SWITCHGEAR MODIFICATIONS This item is for rewiring of frequency relays 81-1 and 81-2 to protect the engine generators against automatic reclosure of Southern California Edison (SCE) incoming service breakers after power outages. This item of work was accomplished by the Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO J191-046) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $784.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 6 - CLEAN OUT HEAT EXCHANGERS This item is for providing labor and materials to clean debris out of the Chiller Nos. 1 and 2 Cooling Water Heat Exchangers (16HTX428 and 16HTX438). Failure of the Central Power Generation Facility plant water strainer allowed debris to become lodged inside these heat exchangers. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,498.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" Page 4 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER. Contractor: Hunter Corporation C. 0. No.: Twenty-six (26) Date: November 10, 1993 Job: Central Power Generation Systems at Plant No. 1 , Job No. J-19-1 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers ITEM 7 - ADDITIONAL COLUMN SUPPORT This item is for providing an additional column and footing to provide additional support for the HVAC Room stairs. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $3,281 .00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 8 - REVISED CONTRACTOR'S ONE YEAR GUARANTEE PERIOD This item is for revising the period of the Contractor's one year guarantee as specified in General Provision 4-33 of the contract documents. As a consequence of delays associated with defects found in equipment provided by the engine manufacturer, Cooper Industries, the warranty period for all electrical equipment, mechanical equipment, instrumentation, and pumps provided by the Contractor shall be revised to begin on January 18, 1993 and end on January 18, 1994. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 173,975.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 59 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 59 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. "E-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4" Page 5 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 108" ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER. Contractor: Hunter Corporation C. O. No.: Twenty-six 1261 Date: November 10. 1993 Job: Central Power Generation Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: February 21, 1991 Original Contract Time: 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: October 12, 1992 Time Extension this C.O.: 59 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 394 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: 994 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date: November 10, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract. Price $ 15,410,855.00 Prev. Authorized Changes S 1,527,937.00 This Change (Add) Qedeet) S 173,975.00 Amended Contract Price S 17.112.767.00 "E-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-5" Page 6 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER. Contractor: -Hunter Corooration C. 0. No.: Twenty-six (26) Date: November 10. 1993 Job: Central Power Generation Systems at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 Consultant: Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers Board Authorization Date: November 10, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Rec mended by: 0�� /�8�3 ngineering Manager 4�Date C nstruction Manager Date App 2V : A roved as to Form: Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date Accepted by: HUNTER CORPORATION /o � Contractor Date "E-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-6" Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction. Inc. C. 0. No.: One (1) Date: November 10.1993 Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-2 Consultant: John Carollo Enaineers Amount of this Change Order {Add}(Deduct) $_L54,000.001 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - DELETE CONTRACTOR'S "ALL RISK" INSURANCE. REQUIREMENT: In the bid Schedule of Prices, Item No. 2, the cost of this insurance is called out separately with the option of deleting the insurance. The Districts have determined that it is in their best interest to delete the Builder's "All Risk" Insurance. The insurance will be provided by the Districts' insurance carrier. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S (54,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ (54,000.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER- Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C. 0. No.: One (1) Date: November 10.1993 Job: Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-2 Consultant: John Carollo Ena(neers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: June 2, 1993 Original Contract Time: 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: June 1, 1995 Time Extension this Change Order: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: Not Applicable Revised Final Completion: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 14,496,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (54.000.00) Amended Contract Price $ 14,442,000.00 "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 - CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Margate Construction, Inc. C. O. No.: One (1) Date: November 10.1993 Job: Secondary Treatment Exoansion at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-2 Consultant: John Carollo Enoineers Board Authorization Date: November 10, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Recommended By: / Recommended By: /Engineering Manager Date Co struction Manager Date App ve -By: Approved As To Form: / s Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date Accepted By: MARGATE CO`(\N'S�1TRUUC'TIIOON, INC.y1 Contractor i Date "F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3" Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER. Contractor: Pascal and Ludwia Engineers C. O. No.: One (1) Date: Novembor10. 1993 Job: Priority Proiects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1 . Job No. P1-38-2 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Amount of this Change Order4Adi*(Deduct) $ (13,600,00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - DELETE CONTRACTOR'S "ALL RISK" INSURANCE REQUIREMENT: In the bid Schedule of.Prices, Item No. 2, the cost of this insurance is called out separately with the option of deleting the insurance. The Districts have determined that it is in their best interest to delete the Builder's "All Risk" Insurance. The insurance will be provided by the Districts' insurance carrier. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (13,600.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER : S (13,600.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" .. Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C. 0. No.: One (1) Date: November 10, 1993 Job: Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1 . Job No. P1-38-2 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: July 21, 1993 Original Contract Time: 420 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: September 13 ,1994 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 3.364.600.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ .00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (13,600,00) Amended Contract Price 5 3,351,000.00 "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS $G-2 $ Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 _ CHANGE ORDER. Contractor: Pascal and Ludwig Engineers C. O. No.: One (1) Date: November 10, 1993 Job: Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1. Job No, P7-38-2 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Board Authorization Date: November 10, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Recommended by: ngineer Date Construction Manager Date Appra y: Approved as to Form: 7 a '�M�Bat� Da Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date Accepted by: PASCAL AND LUDWIG ENGINEERS /o�P�93 Contractor D e "G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER . Contractor: Colich Bros.. Inc. dba Colich and Sons C. O. No.: One (1) Date: November 10. 1993 Job: Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage Improvements. Contract No 11-17.1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Amount of this Change Order (Add)(Deduct) $ (27,625.00) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - DELETE CONTRACTOR'S "ALL RISK" INSURANCE REQUIREMENT: In the bid Schedule of Prices, Item No. 2, the cost of this insurance is called out separately with the option of deleting the insurance. The Districts have determined that it is in their best interest to delete the Builder's "All Risk" Insurance. The insurance will be provided by the Districts' insurance carrier. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (27,625.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ (27,625.00) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( k) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "H-1" Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER . Contractor: Colich Bros.. Inc. dba Colich and Sons C. 0. No.: One (1) Date: November 10, 1993 Job: Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage Improvements. Contract No. 11-17-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date: October 11, 1993 Original Contract Time: 500 Calendar Days Original Completion Date: February 22, 1995 Time Extension this C.O.: 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension: 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time: Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Due Date: Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages: Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date: Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 5,626,370.00 Prev. Authorized Changes $ .00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ (27,625.00) Amended Contract Price $ 5,598,745.00 "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( k) - DISTRICTS 3 8 11 "H-2" Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. 0. BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 CHANGE ORDER Contractor: Colich Bros.. Inc. dba Colich and Sons C. 0. No.: One (1) Date: November10. 1993 Job: Slater Avenue Pumo Station Sewage Improvements Contract No 11-17-1 Consultant: John Carollo Engineers Board Authorization Date: November 10, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted by: Recommended by: *Engineering Manager Date Construction Manager Date Appr � y: Approved as to Form: Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date Accepted by: COUCH BROS.,(�INC. dba COUCH AND SONS l to-to 'c1-1, Co tractor Date "H-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "H-3" RESOLUTION NO. 93-147 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR PHASE I PRELIMINARY PROJECT REPORT FOR SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 11-17 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR PHASE I PRELIMINARY PROJECT REPORT FOR SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 11-17, PROVIDING FOR A REALLOCATION OF COSTS AMONG CATEGORIES WITHIN SAID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Phase I Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for final design of Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, and construction support services for said project; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said agreement to provide for a reallocation of costs among categories Within said agreement with no change in the maximum authorized compensation. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated November 10, 1993 , to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated June 7, 1989, by and between County Sanitation District No. 3, acting for "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "I-1" itself and on behalf of District No. 11 and John Carollo Engineers, for preparation of Phase I Preliminary Project Report for Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17, providing for a reallocation of costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2 . That said work shall be accomplished with no increase in the total authorized compensation of $694, 121.00, as follows: Exislina Amended Agreement Addendum No. 2 Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 153%, not to exceed $550,991.00 $1,976.67 $552,967.67 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 70,295.00 (1,976.67) 68,318.33 Fixed Profit 69,835.00 400 69.835.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $894,121.00 9 0.00 $694,121.00 Section 3 . That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 11, acting for itself and on behalf of District No. 3, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1993. RW213n "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - DISTRICTS 3 & 11 "I-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-148-5 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RE CONTRACT NO. 5-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RE FACILITIES NECESSARY TO PROVIDE ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO CRYSTAL COVE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated November 10, 1993 for facilities necessary to provide electrical service to Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, is hereby approved; and, Section 2 . That the r4eal property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted at no cost to Southern California Edison Company; and, Section 3 . That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 5 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Grant of Easement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1993 . RE7.148 "J" AGENDA ITEM #9(m) - DISTRICT 5 "J" RESOLUTION NO. 93-145 APPROVING LETTER AGREEMENT WITH ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE TO SERVE AS THE DISTRICTS' • SPECIAL COUNSEL FOR THE TAXABLE COMMERCIAL PAPER PROGRAM A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LETTER AGREEMENT WITH ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE TO SERVE AS THE DISTRICTS' SPECIAL COUNSEL FOR THE TAXABLE COMMERCIAL PAPER PROGRAM (TCPP) WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have received and considered a report from their staff and consulting finance team indicating that the Districts could realize a substantial net annual financial gain by implementing a Taxable Commercial Paper Program for tax and user fee revenue "dry-period" funding; and, WHEREAS, based on said report, it is deemed in the Districts' best interests to implement such a program; and, WHEREAS, the review of special legal counsel are necessary to implement said program. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER; "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) ( 1) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1" Section 1. That the firm of Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe is hereby appointed and designated as Special Counsel for the Taxable Commercial Paper Program; and, Section 2 . That the terms and conditions of that certain Letter Agreement from Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, dated 1993, are hereby approved; and, Section 3 . That payment for said Special Counsel services, in an amount not to exceed $30, 000. 00, is hereby authorized; and, Section 4 . That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Memorandum Agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1993. r W'145 "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #11 (b) ( 1 ) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-146 APPROVING MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT WITH ROURKE, WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN TO SERVE AS THE DISTRICTS' CO-COUNSEL FOR TAXABLE COMMERCIAL PAPER PROGRAM A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT WITH ROURKE, WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN TO SERVE AS THE DISTRICTS' CO-COUNSEL FOR TAXABLE COMMERCIAL PAPER PROGRAM (TCPP) WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have received and considered a report from their staff and consulting finance team indicating that the Districts could realize a substantial net annual financial gain by implementing a Taxable Commercial Paper Program for tax and user fee revenue "dry-period" funding; and, WHEREAS, based on said report, it is deemed in the Districts' best interests to implement such a program; and, WHEREAS, the services of the Districts' General Counsel are necessary to assist the Special Counsel in implementing said program. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER; "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (1 ) (C) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" Section 1. That the firm of Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin is hereby appointed and designated as Co-Bond Counsel for the Taxable Commercial Paper Program; and, Section 2. That the terms and conditions of that certain Memorandum Agreement from Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, dated October 13, 1993 , are hereby approved; and, Section 3 . That payment for said Co-Bond Counsel services, in an amount not to exceed $5,000.00, is hereby authorized; and, Section 4. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Memorandum Agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1993. xec LJ- "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) ( 1) (C) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS EI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLIS AVENUE N.O.BOx 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 82128.812E 91A1882.2411 November 3, 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: All Board Members FROM: A.B. "Buck" Catlin, Past Joint Chairman Don R. Griffin, Past Joint Chairman RE: Role of the Joint Chairman In view of the recent discussions concerning the post of Joint Chairman, some Directors thought that it would be helpful for all the Board Members if we, as the sitting past Joint Chairmen, would briefly review the Joint Chairman's role. We are pleased to offer the following. Few people appreciate the magnitude of the Districts' operation. The Districts are a corporation with $1.3 billion in assets and annual budgets of appropriately $635 million. Being the third largest POTW west of the Mississippi, the day-to-day activities of an enterprise that large require the regular attention and involvement of the Joint Chairman. The individual holding that office is the chief liaison between the policy making Directors and the management staff. To achieve the highest level of performance and the stature that the Districts enjoy, it is necessary for the Joint Chairman to spend a considerable amount of non-compensable meeting time, throughout every month, in unscheduled telephone and personal discussions and meetings with the general manager, general counsel, department heads and certain division managers, providing policy direction and interpretation and addressing issues that arise on a regular but non-agenda basis. The subjects cover a broad range including pending legislative and regulatory issues, labor relations, procurement,construction developments,agenda matters, issues with other agencies, and operating emergencies. For the most part,this activity takes place during normal business hours, but occurs at night-time and weekends as well, and Joint Chairmen have always made themselves available to be interrupted when the staff calls. "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #15 - ALL DISTRICTS "M-111 Role of the Joint Chairman November 3, 1993 In addition to the liaison with management, the Joint Chairman is frequently called upon to consult with other Directors at non-scheduled meeting times on matters of Districts' business. Although the Joint Chairman is not a designated member of all Board Committees, a substantial amount of time is spent consulting with the Chairs, making Board Committee appointments and assignments, keeping current with their activities by reviewing the issues pending before each committee and their agendas, as well as the reports and minutes of the meetings. Of course, representation of the Boards in testifying before legislative and regulatory authorities when necessary and at other public ceremonies, while not frequent, is very time consuming when required. In summary, we would simply observe that some of what the Joint Chairman does is readily apparent but much of the job is not. The most obvious duties include preparation and chairing of the monthly Joint Board Meeting and several of the Board Committees, which often results in multiple meetings on the same day. But beyond that, there is a considerable amount of work that is not so evident, nor is it usually compensable. Hera:\wpdm\0m4c99\mmtli2.1 2 "M-2" AGENDA ITEM #15 - ALL DISTRICTS "M-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS " OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 "4'x°e cW (714)962-2411 November 3, 1993 MEMORANDUM TO: All Board Members RE: Joint Chairman's Term and Compensation As you know, the Joint Chairman's compensation and term have recently been a topic of discussion. Frankly, I'm not sure why I've been singled out for criticism because the same policies that apply to me have applied to all previous Joint Chairmen. Regardless, I believe the Directors need to review these matters and decide if they wish to change their policies. Attached is a memorandum from the Districts' General Counsel submitted at my request because of recent newspaper articles about the Joint Chairman's compensation. Also attached is a copy of the current Board policy resolution that establishes the Joint Chairman's compensation. (Although this is the resolution of District No. 1, all Districts have adopted the same policy.) The Boards have several policies in force pertaining to these issues which are summarized below. With regard to the Joint Chairman's term, the Boards' Rules of Procedures provide for nominations for the office of Joint Chairman each year in June and for election in July, but there is no specific Board policy relative to term limit. In accordance with State law, the Boards' policy provides that each Director receive $100 for attendance at Board meetings or for each day's service as a Board member, not to exceed $600 per month. Each day's service includes but is not limited to attendance at Board and Board Committee meetings; and conferences with legislators or attendance at meetings hearings or conferences when approved by the Boards, or when designated by the General Manager with the concurrence of the Joint Chairman when deemed to be in the best interests of the Districts. "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #15 ALL DISTRICTS "N-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1 C8.14 ELLIS AVENUE n VO.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA B2128-8127 O141 B62-2411 Joint Chairman's Term and Compensation November 3, 1993 Page 2 Annually, in conjunction with the budget process, the Joint Boards take a separate action authorizing the General Manager to designate both members of the Boards and staff to attend meetings and other functions deemed to be in the Districts' interests. The Boards have also adopted a policy authorizing members of the Executive Committee to attend state association meetings. The Districts belong to the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA). CASA lobbies on legislative and regulatory matters at the state level on behalf of California wastewater agencies. CASA has been very effective in Sacramento, most recently in preserving our tax revenues from being transferred by the Legislature to the State to fund schools. The state-wide law also recognizes that additional demands are placed on the Joint Chairman and, accordingly, provide for compensation to the Joint Chairman by each District for Joint Board meetings only, which the Boards implemented in 1963. The duties and work load of the Joint Chairman are greatly influenced by the issues before the Boards at any given time and will, for that reason, vary between Joint Chairmen. But I want to assure you that during my tenure, the conduct of the Boards' business has always been carried out in compliance with the law, the above policies and past practices. Nonetheless, I believe it is appropriate to revisit our policies and I support a review of these matters by the Boards. I have therefore asked that they be agendized for discussion and a determination as to any appropriate changes the Directors would like to make. I would have done so at any time previously had any Director made it known to me that they wished to address the Boards' policies on these items. Sincerely, (ZX William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Attachments (2) M: IC83\CANEU,".h, "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #15 - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2" RESOLUTION NO. 86-152-1 ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES FOR DIRECTORS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE COMPENSATION AND EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT POLICIES FOR ITS DIRECTORS, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NOS. 76-11-1, 76-91, 79-182, 81-168 AND 82-174-1 k t t R t t t f R t t f f f f t t R WHEREAS, Section 4733 of the Health and Safety Code provides that the District Board has the power to fix the amount of compensation per meeting to be paid each member of the Board or for each day's service rendered as a member by request of the Board; and, WHEREAS, Section 4733 .5 of the Health and Safety Code provides that where two or more County Sanitation Districts have joined in the purchase, ownership, use, construction or operation of a sewerage system and said Districts hold their meetings jointly, and one or more of the Directors serve as a Director on more than one of such Districts meeting jointly, the Districts may, by resolution approved by each District, limit the compensation of such a Director for attending said jointly held meetings; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, have heretofore executed a Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement, which was effective July 1, 1985; and, WHEREAS, Section 4734 of the Health and Safety Code provides that where two or more County Sanitation Districts have joined in the -1- "N-6" AGENDA ITEM #15 - ALL DISTRICTS "N-V administration and operation of the respective Districts and hold their meetings jointly and such meetings are presided over by a Director of one of the Districts acting as Joint Chairman for and on behalf of the joint organization, each District so participating may pay the Joint Chairman the same compensation as a Director of such District is paid; and, WHEREAS, said Districts hold their regular monthly meetings jointly. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That each Director shall receive the sum of One Hundred ( $100.00) Dollars for attendance at each meeting of the Board of Directors or for each day' s service rendered as a member of the Board, by request of the Board, provided that he shall not receive more than the sum of Six Hundred ($600.00) Dollars per month as such compensation from this District. Each day' s service rendered as a member of the District Board shall be deemed to include, but not be limited to, attendance: (a) as a member of the Executive Committee of the Joint Administrative Organization; (b) as a member of any committee appointed by the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization or the Chairman of the District which has established the committee; (c) when expressly invited to attend the Executive Committee meetings by the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization; (d) at conferences with State and/or Federal legislators regarding Joint Administrative Organization business when approved by action of the Joint Boards; or (a) attendance at a meeting, -2- "N-7" AGENDA ITEM #15 -^ALL DISTRICTS "N-7" hearing, or conference for business of the Joint Administrative Organization or the District when approved by action of the Joint Boards or the District Board, or when designated by the General Manager with the concurrence of the Joint Chairman when deemed to be in the best interests of the District. Section 2. If a Director represents two or more Districts, the payment to the Director for attendance at meetings or for each day' s service shall be shared equally with each District represented by the Director. Section 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1, when a Director of this District is also a Director of another District, said Director shall be paid not more than a total of One Hundred ($100.00) Dollars per day for attendance at any jointly-held meeting of said Districts or each day's services rendered concurrently to said Districts by the Director when such other District, or Districts, has , or have, adopted a resolution substantially similar to this one, as is permitted under the provisions of Section 4733 .5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Section 4. Section 3 of this Resolution shall not apply to the Director serving as Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. The Director serving as Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall receive the sum of One Hundred ($100.00) Dollars from each District which he presides over in a jointly-held meeting of the Joint Administrative Organization, as authorized by Section 4734 of the California Health and Safety Code; -3- "N-8" AGENDA ITEM #15 - ALL DISTRICTS "N-8" provided, however, that the Joint Chairman shall not be paid more than One Hundred ($100.00) Dollars by any District for any meeting. Section 5. The Director serving as Chairman or Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall receive the sum of One Hundred ( $100.00) Dollars from the District which he represents and no other District when attending a meeting of his District or other Districts or Executive Committee or other Committee assignments approved by the Joint Boards, or when attending to special services rendered as a Director by request of the Joint Boards. Section 6. Each Director shall be reimbursed at the rate per mile established by the United States Internal Revenue Service as allowable for mileage expense deduction for use of personal vehicle or business of the District. When traveling on the business of more than one District, such Director shall receive no more than reimbursement for the actual miles traveled, whether on the business of one or several Districts. As said allowable rate established by the Internal Revenue Service is periodically changed, said changes in the reimbursement rate shall become effective on the first day of the month following the month in which the change is announced by the Internal Revenue Service. Section 7. When traveling on the business of one or more Districts, the Director shall be entitled to reimbursement of expenses necessarily incurred in the course of said travel in accordance with the following schedule: _q_ "N-9" AGENDA ITEM #15 - ALL DISTRICTS "N-9" Commercial Transportation - Per actual invoice Hotel - Room rate per actual statement for occupancy Registration - Actual cost of conference or meeting registration fee Ground Transportation - As itemized Telephone Service - As itemized Meals, Gratuities and Incidentals - $40.00 per day. In those cases where the actual cost of the Director's personal meals and incidentals required during the course of the conference or meeting exceeds the per diem, reimbursement will be based upon actual expenditures. Section 8. No Director shall receive pay for attendance at any meeting, such as Executive Committee or other committees , which is scheduled immediately preceding, immediately succeeding, or concurrent with a regularly scheduled District or joint meeting of the District. Section 9. Resolution Nos. 76-11-1, 76-91, 79-182, 81-168 and 82-174-1 concerning compensation and expenses for Directors are hereby repealed and made of no further effect. Section 10. Any and all other resolutions or minute orders of this Board in conflict with the provisions herein are deemed to be superceded and repealed. Section 11. This Resolution shall become effective January 1, 1987. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held December 10, 1986. "N-10" AGENDA ITEM #15 - ALL DISTRICTS "N-10" -5- RESOLUTION NO. 93-150 AWARDING JOB NO, P1-46-1 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PHASE I WASTERAULER DUMPING FACILITIES MODIFICATIONS, JOB NO. P1-46-1 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. In accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Boards of Directors, on April 30, 1993, authorized filing a Notice of Exemption in connection with the proposed project for Phase I Wastehauler Dumping Facilities Modifications, Job No. P1-46-1; and, Section 2 . That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Dorado Enterprises Inc. for Phase I Wastehauler Dumping Facilities Modifications, Job No. P1-46-1, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for Phase I Wastehauler Dumping Facilities Modifications, Job No. P1-46-1, be awarded to Dorado Enterprises Inc. in the total amount of $248,953 .00 in 11 0-11, AGENDA ITEM #16(b) - ALL DISTRICTS 110-11, accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained ' therein; and, Section 4 . That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1993. rc3bj.150 "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #16(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2" bUUNIE JANIIAIIUN UIbIHILAb November 2, 1993 N ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 11 :00 a.m. 1GBG4 ELUS AVENUE No Addenda AQW.8127 F=WWN VAUL .CAUFOPMA 9E729.6 127 mA�A22RAn BID TABULATION Job No. P7-46-1 PROJECT TITLE: Phase 1 Wastehauler Dumping Facilities Modifications PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct two 12-inch gravity sewers. one 84-inch manhole, two dump ports, water flushing system. paving and landscaping ENGINEER'S BUDGET Part of ESTIMATE: $200.000 AMOUNT: $2.000.000 Project - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -TOTAL - - CONTRACTOR BID 1. Dorado Enterprises Inc., Fountain Valley, CA $248,953.00 2. Mladen Buntich Construction Co., Inc., Sunland, CA $296,700.00 3. Colich & Sons, Gardena, CA $399,000.00 4. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, Ontario, CA $484,000.00 5. -Mike Prlich & Sons, South El Monte, CA $493,308.00 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Dorado Enterprises Inc. in the bid amount of $248,953.00 as the lowest and best bid. -Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering "0-3" AGENDA ITEM #16(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-3" RESOLUTION NO. 93-149 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO, 14-1-1A A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 6, 7 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BAKER-GISLER INTERCEPTOR, FROM FAIRVIEW ROAD TO PLANT NO. 1, CONTRACT NO. 14-1-1A WHEREAS, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 6, 7 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed project for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-3A, is included in the Supplement No. 2 to the Environmental Impact Report for Proposed Formation of County Sanitation District No. 14 and Proposed Reorganization No. 79 Involving Reorganization of Districts Nos. 7 and 13. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Final Supplement No. 2 to the Environmental Impact Report was approved on May 13, 1992. A Notice of Determination was filed by the Secretary on May 14, 1992, in accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 2970, as amended; and, "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #32(b) - DISTRICTS 6,7814 "P-1" Section 2. That the project for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-1A, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 2970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation, Districts, engineers, for Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, Contract No. 14-1-3A, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 4 . That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and, Section 5. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held November 10, 1993. RC21.149 "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #32(b) - DISTRICTS 6,7914 "P-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29, 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON OCTOBER 13, 1993 lTATjo&O 84w195 (iE COV ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Dim icts Nos. 1, 2,3, 5, 6. 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on October 13, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2,3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Robert Richardson, Chairman Thomas E.Lutz a x Fred Sanem. Chairman pro tom Gene Beyer James M.Ferrymen Nate Reads Thomas R.Saharelli Leslie Pontioua Roger Stamon William G. Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: _a— John Collins, Chairman _ George Soon Henry W.Wades,Chairman pro tern _ John M.Gulluson Fred gainers Gene Rarer i_ Bob Bell Barry Dams 3� Buck Catlin Molly McClanahan William D.Mahoney James H.Nora Made More. Norman Z.Eckenrods Caney J.Nelson Glenn Parker IN Rckler Tom Daly _ Miguel Pulso Thomas E. LUR Roger Stanton William G.Stabler George L.Zlali Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO.3: J_ Sal A. Sapum. Chairmen Don Martinez Burnie Dunlap Caney J.Nelson George Brawn Gwen A.Forsythe Buck Catin Molly McClanahan y John Collins George Scott James V. Evank Margie L.Rice James H.Flora William D.Mahoney Don R.Griffin Arthur Brown Gail Kerry Cecilia L.Aga .L Thomas E. Ltdz Robert Richardson JL Eva G.Miner,Chairman pro tam Wally Linn L IN Rckler Tom Daly J_ Jim Silva Earle Natitaills y Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaktt Roper Stamon _� William G.Steiner Chades Sylvia Ronald Bates -DISTRICT NO.5: John C. Cox,Jr.,Chairman Jim Debey Phil Sansone. Chaiman pro tam Jan Dat ay • William G. Stainer Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: _a_ James A, Wenner, Chairman Arthur Perry • Evelyn Hart,Chairmen pro tam John C.Cos,Jr. William G. SteiM, Roger Stamm DISTRICT NO.7: y_ Berry Hammond,Chairman Mike Word James A.Wenner, Chairman pro tem Mike Schaefer Fred Barren Gene Beyer y Jan Debay Phil Sansone Ted Moreno Miguel Pulido Chadors E.Puckett Thomas R.Salteralli William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace winches, Chairman Earle Robitaille _x Victor Leipzig. Chairman pro tam Jim Silva Roger Stanton y_ William G. Steiner s DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M.Gulluson, Chairman Henry W.Wallis . Fred6anera, Chairmen pro ter Gene Beyer x Glenn Parker Bunie Dunlap i . IN Rckler Tom Daly William G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: Peer A. Swse,Chairman Darryl Miller i labile Pontioua, Chairman pro tam Chadors E. Puckott Fred Be,,.. Gana Beyer Barry Hammond Mike Ward v William G.Steiner Roper Stanton —2— 10/13/93 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Corinne Clawson, Scott Engstrom, Patti Gorczyca, Gary Hasenstab, nM John Linder, Bob Ooten, Mary Simpson, James Steffen, Linh Tran, Jack Vincent, Jim Wybenga, Ray Young, Paula Zeller ` OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Walt Howard, Tom Nixon, Phil Stone DISTRICT 3 In the absence of Chairman Sal Sapien and Appointment of Chairman pro tem Chairman pro tem Burnie Dunlap, Director Eva Miner was appointed Chairman pro tem of District No. 3. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the Report of the Joint Chairman tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Engineering and Construction Committee - Wednesday, October 20th, at 4:30 p.m. Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, October 20th, at 5:30 p.m. Joint Works Selection Committee - Thursday, October 21st, at 7:30 a.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, October 27th, at 5:30 p.m. (Directors Ted Moreno and Leslie Pontious were also invited to attend.) Conservation, Reclamation & Reuse Committee - Thursday, October 26th, at 5:30 p.m. Personnel Committee - will meet at the call of the Chairman ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager referred Directors to Report of the General Manaaer the $46,000,000 Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series statement that was included in the Directors' folders that evening. The statement provides the final details of the transaction that had previously been authorized by the Boards. Included with that statement was an article from the Bond Buyer on the issue. Mr. Sylvester then announced that the Districts' Financial Manager for the past three years, Patti Gorczyca, would be leaving the Districts to work in the private sector for a financial advisory firm. He then recognized Ms. Gorczyca and extended his regards and appreciation to her for the instrumental role that she played in the development of the Districts' investment program. -3- 10/13/93 DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 8, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held ' September 8, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 8, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 8, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 8, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 8, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 8, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 8, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 8, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 10/13/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and eW are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 09/08/93 09/22/93 ' ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - S 489,567.93 S 695,926.02 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,199,464.73 905,606.28 Joint Working Capital Fund - 169,607.81 162,630.28 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 7,735.27 15,250.00 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 41,007.10 5,384.52 DISTRICT NO, 2 - 8,326.83 26,387.93 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 34,168.02 32,219.67 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 8,598.09 190,491.01 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 2.93 332.72 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 15,348.67 2,854.22 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 33.71 7,454.77 DISTRICT NO, 13 - 0.00 0.00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 389.25 5,527.71 DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 11 JOINT - 0.00 2,335.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT 3,110.52 10,102.46 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,603.36 0.00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 111.94 5,212.94 51.980.076.16 S2.067.715.53 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awardina agreement for Custodial Maintenance Service for Laboratory That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt and Operations/Maintenance Resolution No. 93-133, receiving and filing Buildings. Specification No. M-045 bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding agreement for Custodial Maintenance Service for Laboratory and Operations/Maintenance Buildings, Specification No. M-045, to Bell Building Maintenance Company for a total amount not to exceed $26,124.00, plus applicable taxes, for a one-year period beginning November 1, 1993, with option for two one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -5- 10/13/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awardin�7c Laboratory Services Contract for Analysis of Wastewater That the bid tabulation and recommendation and Biosolids. Specification for award of purchase order contract for No. 5-071 . to Truesdail Laboratories. Laboratory Services Contract for Analysis of Inc. Wastewater and Biosolids, Specification No. 5-071 , be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the bids of Applied P & Ch Laboratory and C. L. Technology, Inc., be, and are hereby, rejected because of California Department of Health Services certification issues; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Truesdail Laboratories, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $63,693.00 for the period October 13, 1993 to October 12, 1994, with option for one one-year extension. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to issue purchase orders to the City of That the General Manager be, and is hereby, Fountain Valley and the City of authorized to issue purchase orders to the Huntington Beach for plan check and City of Fountain Valley and the City of fees and permit charges Huntington Beach for plan check and fees and permit charges for Districts' non-treatment plant support facilities' projects. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to No. 55227 issued to Southern issue Change Order No. 2 to Purchase Order California Gas Company for No. 55227 issued to Southern California realignment of SCGC gas service Gas Company in connection with the pipeline serving Treatment Plant No. 2 realignment of SCGC gas service pipeline re Job No. J-22-2 serving Treatment Plant No. 2 in order to accommodate the Replacement of a Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-22-2, increasing the total authorized amount from an amount not to exceed $25,000 estimated for costs to relocate said gas service pipeline, to an amount not to exceed $31,562.07, an increase of $6,562.07, to reflect the actual costs. -6- 10/13/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoprovino Chance Order No. 25 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 25 to the plans and No. J-19-1 specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $23,447.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: ' Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2), authorizing an addition of $6,685.00 to the contract with Javaid Contractors, Inc. for three items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 26 calendar days for completion of said additional work and to settle a claim for delays associated with review of insurance, bond on other contract documents and issuance of a Notice to Proceed, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to award, a contract for construction of That the General Manager be, and is hereby, Job No. P7-46-1 authorized to solicit bids and award a contract to the low bidder for construction of Phase I Wastehauler Dumping Facilities Modifications, Job No. P1-46-1, in an amount not to exceed $200,000. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Electrification of Pump Drives at That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job Resolution No. 93-134, approving plans and No P1-36-1: Security and specifications for Electrification of Pump Landscaping Element of Miscellaneous Drives at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. P1-36-1; Security and Landscaping No. 1. Job No. P1-38-1: Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-1; Facilities at Plant No. 1. Job Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at No. P7-38-4: and Miscellaneous Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-38-4; and Improvements to Facilities at Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-3, No P2-43-3 and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -7- 10/13/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 1 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is Professional Services Agreement hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum with Lee & Ro Consulting Enaineers No. 1 to the Professional Services for preparation of a project report. Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting preliminary design. Plans and Engineers for preparation of a project report, specifications and Providing preliminary design, plans and specifications construction support services for Job and providing construction support services Nos. P1-38-5 and P2-46 relative to Process Area Fire Protection Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-5, and Process Area Fire Protection, Signage and Water Distribution System Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-46, providing for changes to city water pump station at Plant No. 1 . ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of staff in issuing Chance Order No. 4 to Purchase That the action of staff in issuing Change Order No. 59981 issued to Charles Order No. 4 to Purchase Order No. 59981 Evans and Associates to conduct issued to Charles Evans and Associates to additional forensic testing Pertaining conduct additional forensic testing pertaining to the Central Power Generation to the Central Power Generation Engine Engine Restoration at Plant No. 2 Restoration at Plant No. 2, as ordered by the arbitrator, authorizing an addition of $20,000.00, increasing the maximum authorized amount from $480,749.00 to $500,749.00, be, and is hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive. file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committee Committee and Executive Committee meetings held on September 15, 1993 and September 22, 1993, respectively, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. , -8- 10/13/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Interim Discharge Permit of the Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site Receive and file letter from the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority re extension of interim permit for Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority dated August 23, 1993, requesting an extension of the interim permit to discharge pretreated groundwater from the Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site to the Districts' sewerage system, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated September 15, 1993, relative to the request for Stringfellow permit extension, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Directing staff to authorize the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority to issue an extension of the interim California Department of Toxic Substances Control permit for Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the staff be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to authorize the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority to issue an extension of the interim California Department of Toxic Substances Control permit for discharge of pretreated groundwater from the Stringfellow Waste Disposal Site to the Districts' sewerage system from December 31, 1993 to December 31, 1996 and providing that said extension be subject to continuing satisfactory progress by DTSC and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in addressing the long-term clean-up solution for the Stringfellow site. -9- 10/13/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re first readina and introduction of proposed ordinances Establishino Source Control Fees. Non-Compliance Semolina Fees and Miscellaneous Charges (Fee Ordinance). and first readina and introduction of or000sed ordinances Establishing Charges for Use of Districts' Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers (User Charge Ordinancel Receive and file Staff Report dated September 15. 1993 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated September 15, 1993 re proposed Ordinances Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges (Fee Ordinance) and Establishing Charges for Use of Districts' Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers (User Charge Ordinance) be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. DISTRICT 1 Actions re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No, 122 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 122 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 122, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. 10- 10/13/93 First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 122 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 122 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 122 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 122, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be Introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 2 Actions re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 217 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 217 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 217, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. -11- 10/13/93 First readinc of or000sed Ordinance No. 217 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 217 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 217 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 217, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 3 Actions re first readinc and introduction of or000sed Ordinance No. 320 Making finding that adootion of Ordinance No. 320 is statutorily exempt oer CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 320, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. 12 10/13/93 First readina of proposed Ordinance No. 320 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 320 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 320 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 320, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 5 Actions re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 529 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 529 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 529, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. -13- 10/13/93 First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 529 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 529 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 529 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 529, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 6 Actions re first readina and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 623 Makina finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 623 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 623, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. -14- 10/13/93 First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 623 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 623 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 623 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 623, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 7 Actions re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 730 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 730 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 730, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. -15- 10/13/93 First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 730 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 730 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of ' County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be, and is hereby, waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 730 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 730, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 11 Actions re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 1119 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1119 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1119, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. -16- 10/13/93 First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 1119 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 1119 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1119 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1119, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 13 Actions re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance - No. 1313 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1313 is - statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1313, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. -17- 10/13/93 First readino of proposed Ordinance No. 1313 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 1313 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1313 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1313, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 14 Actions re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 1405 Makino finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1405 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1405, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. -18- 10/13/93 First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 1405 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 1405 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1405 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1405, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 1 Actions re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 123 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 123 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 123, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. -19- 10/13/93 First readina of or000sed Ordinance No. 123 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 123 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 123 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 123, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 2 Actions re first reading and introduction of or000sed Ordinance No. 218 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 218 is statutorily exempt oer CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 218, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. -20- 10/13/93 First readina of proposed Ordinance No. 218 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 218 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 218 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 218, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 3 Actions re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 321 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 321 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 321, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. _Y1_ 10/13/93 First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 321 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 321 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 321 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 321, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 5 Actions re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 530 Making findino that adoption of Ordinance No. 530 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 530, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. _24_ 10/13/93 First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 530 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 530 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 530 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 530, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be Introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 6 Actions re first readino and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 624 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 624 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 624, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. -23- 10/13/93 First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 624 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 624 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 624 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 624, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 7 Actions re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 731 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 731 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 731, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. -24- 10/13/93 First reading of or000sed Ordinance No. 731 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 731 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers,. be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 731 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 731, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 11 Actions re first readina and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 1120 Makina finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1120 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1120, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. 25 10/13/93 First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 1120 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 1120 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1120 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1120, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 13 Actions re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 1314 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1314 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1314, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. -26- 10/13/93 First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 1314 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 1314 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1314 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1314, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. DISTRICT 14 Actions re first reading and introduction of proposed Ordinance No. 1406 Making finding that adoption of Ordinance No. 1406 is statutorily exempt per CEQA Guidelines Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby finds that adoption of Ordinance No. 1406, An Ordinance of The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15273(a) and Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) in that the revenues to be received will be used to meet operational expenses and for the purchase of supplies, equipment and materials. _27_ 10/13/93 First reading of proposed Ordinance No. 1406 Moved, seconded and duly carried by unanimous vote: That proposed Ordinance No. 1406 An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be read by title only and that reading of said ordinance in its entirety be waived. Following the reading of Ordinance No. 1406 by title only, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: That Ordinance No. 1406, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 of Orange County, California, Establishing Charges for Use of District Facilities by Industrial Users and Wastehaulers, be introduced and passed to second reading and hearing on November 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., at the District's Administrative Office. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP) Amending Boards' action on June 9. 1993. modifying Letter Agreement with Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-135, amending Boards' action on June 9, 1993, modifying Letter Agreement with Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber for underwriting services, and approving withdrawal of PaineWebber from said transaction. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -28- 10/13/93 Authorizina the financing team to proceed with an Interest Rate SWAP to increase Districts' earninas Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the financing team be, and is hereby, authorized to proceed with an Interest Rate SWAP to increase Districts' earnings based on the following structure when market conditions permit: • A $100 million notional amount Interest Rate SWAP for a term not to exceed seven years • Utilize immediate, up-front reversal to lock in minimum as follows: $1 million for one year or $1.5 million for two years Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Aparovina 1993 SWAP Manaaement Guidelines establishina fiscal and management Parameters Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the 1993 SWAP Management Guidelines establishing fiscal and management parameters within which the staff and financing team may act pursuant to delegated authority, and including the requirement that the General Manager or his designee shall first consult members of the Fiscal Policy Committee regarding the proposed action to be taken, be, and is hereby, approved. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -29- 10/13/93 Authorizing District Chairman or Chairman pro tem. Board Secretary, General Manager. Director of Finance. General Counsel and any duly-constituted officer or agent to execute any and all documents necessary and advisable to effectuate the transactions Moved, seconded and duly carried: That each District Chairman or Chairman pro tem, Board Secretary, General Manager, Director of Finance, General Counsel and any other duly-constituted officer or agent be, and are hereby, authorized to execute any and all documents necessary and advisable to effectuate the transactions, if warranted by changing market conditions, to enhance and preserve the Districts' investment earnings in accordance with the 1993 SWAP Management Guidelines. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Directing staff to provide periodic status reports to the Fiscal Policy Committee on market conditions and the SWAP program timino Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, directed to provide periodic status reports to the Fiscal Policy Committee on market conditions and the SWAP program timing. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -30- 10/13/93 ALL DISTRICTS Amending the Boards' April 14, 1993 action authorizina the County Treasurer to make Reverse Repurchase Investments Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the County Treasurer be, and is hereby authorized, upon request by the Districts' financial staff, to make reverse repurchase investments in U.S. Treasuries securities of a maximum amount of $100 million, not to exceed ten-year maturities, and that payment of those securities be made by reversing the securities against themselves; and authorizing payment to the County Treasurer of a $100 flat fee per transaction for the first $50 million, and six basis points per transaction amount for the next $50 million increment (total fee not to exceed $30,200 per transaction); and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to confirm in writing with the County Treasurer, on behalf of the Districts, this action of the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-53-1 Verbal report of staff The Director of Engineering reported that several actions have already been taken providing for enhancements which will increase the reliability of the treatment plants to withstand the impacts of a major earthquake, all in accordance with the 1989 Master Plan. A three-phase approach is in progress. First, an earthquake training exercise was conducted to review safety aspects, establish procedures and develop an emergency management organization framework. This occurred after months of planning and development of formal procedures. Separately, the Directors have authorized staff to proceed with nonstructural modifications to the treatment plants. This work includes the tiedown of equipment, pipes, utilities, etc., to ensure that they remain secure during an earthquake, and is being accomplished either by Districts' staff or included in various other construction contracts. Lastly, in October 1990, the Directors approved geotechnical and structural investigations on Districts' facilities, focusing on older facilities designed under less stringent earthquake safety criteria. -31- 10/13/93 Mr. Dawes stated that B and C Headworks at Treatment Plant No. 2 was found to be highest on the rehabilitation priority list and, in November 1991, the Directors authorized Dames and Moore to design a seismic retrofit to these facilities, including this project, Job No. P2-53-1 . The headworks is one of the most important and critical facilities of the treatment process. All raw sewage is pumped into the plants from below-ground sewers at the headworks. In addition to the pumping of sewage, rags and sand (grit) are removed. Severe damage to these structures could eliminate the ability to pump incoming sewage through the treatment plant and to the ocean outfall. The cost-effective damage prevention measures recommended by Dames and Moore include structural modifications necessary to correct those deficiencies which would render the facilities unsafe or unusable, but would not include total damage prevention. For example, cracks and other minor damage can still occur in a major earthquake. It was further reported that the retrofit of Headworks B and C will not include the solidification of liquefiable soils in the areas surrounding B and C Headworks. This geotechnical portion of the work (a specialty item) has been removed to avoid the general contractor's cost mark-up on this work and to ensure tight control over the contractor performing this work. The work will be accomplished at a later date under a separate contract. Mr. Dawes stated that on September 7, 1993, seven bids were received for this project. The bids ranged from a high of $2,014,894.00 to a low of $1 ,377,000.00, submitted by Amelco Construction and recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-53-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1, making miscellaneous modifications and clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. -32- 10/13/93 Awarding Job No. P2-53-1 to Amelco Construction. a Division of Amelco Industries Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-136, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53-1, to Amelco Construction, a Division of Amelco Industries, in the total amount of $1,377,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors of General Counsel's Comments Prior to the need for a closed session as authorized Closed Session by Government Code Section 54957.6 to review: 11 The Board met in closed session with the Districts' designated representatives regarding the salaries, benefits and terms of employment of the Districts' employees and to provide instructions to said representatives. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 The Boards convened in closed session at 7:54 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:25 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee certification Boyle Engineering Corporation for the of the final negotiated fee relative to preparation of olans and specifications Addendum No. 1 to the Professional for Contract No. 7-23-1 (formerly Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Contract No. 7-23) Corporation for the preparation of plans and specifications for College Avenue Pump Station Replacement Force Mains, Contract No. 7-23-1, (formerly Gisler-Red Hill Parallel Force Main, from College Avenue Pump Station to Iowa Street, Contract No. 7-23), providing for an alternate alignment to include a shorter force main plus gravity sewer, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, -33- 10/13/93 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-137, approving Addendum No. 1 to said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $17,915.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $30,900.00 to an amount not to exceed $48,815.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Journment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:25 p.m., October 13, 1993. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:25 p.m., October 13, 1993. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:25 p.m., October 13, 1993. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:25 p.m., October 13, 1993. DISTRICTS 6. 7 & 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aooroving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee certification Boyle Engineering Corporation for of the final negotiated fee relative to design of Contract Nos. 14-1-1. Addendum No. 3 to the Professional 14-1-2 and 6-12 Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for design of Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-1 (subsequently divided into Contract No. 14-1-1A, from Fairview Road to Plant No. 1, and Contract No. 14-1-1B, from Bristol Street to Fairview Road); Baker Force Mains, from Main Street Pump Station to Bristol Street, Contract No. 14-1-2; and Fairview Relief Sewer, Contract No. 6-12, providing for added costs due to time delays and additional contract documents, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, -34- 10/13/93 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-138, approving Addendum No. 3 to said agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $57,720.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $926,080.00 to an amount not to exceed $983,800.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:25 p.m., October 13, 1993. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 139 - Garr Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-140-7, ordering annexation of 1 .599 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity southeast of the intersection of Ranchwood Trail and Amapola Avenue in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 139 - Garr Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7), Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:25 p.m., October 13, 1993. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:25 p.m., October 13, 1993. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:25 p.m., October 13, 1993. -35- 10/13/93 DISTRICT 14 Actions relative to authorizing transfer of any interests to property by predecessor District No. 14 agency by executina Quitclaim Deeds for two parcels Receive and file Memorandum from General Counsel Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Memorandum from General Counsel dated August 31, 1993, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizing the General Manager to execute Quitclaim Deed to Irvine Ranch District Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-141-14, authorizing the General Manager to execute Quitclaim Deed for two parcels located southerly of University Drive near MacArthur Boulevard, designated by the predecessor agency for a pump station site and site access and not now needed by existing District No. 14 to Irvine Ranch Water District, in form approved by the General Counsel. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Authorizing the General Manager to execute Quitclaim Deed to CALTRANS Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-142-14, authorizing the General Manager to execute Quitclaim Deed for two parcels located southerly of University Drive near MacArthur Boulevard, designated by the predecessor agency for a pump station site and site access and not now needed by existing District No. 14 to CALTRANS, in form approved by the General Counsel. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -36- 10/13/93 DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That the meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:25 p.m., October 13, 1993. t'44'4�f Assistant c et ry the Boards of Directors of County itatio istricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 37 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/01193 PA6L 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/08/93 POSTING DATE 49/08/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132135 AS TECH COMPANY $56.613.32 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 132136 ASR ANALYSIS $560.G0 COMPRESSOR PART 232137 ASO $454.55 AQUARIUMS 132138 AMERICAN TELEPHONE A TELEGRAPH $1,272.59 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 132139 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $961.48 LAB SUPPLIES 132140 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP 16.E80.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES - J-19A 132141 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC S21.55 AIR CONDITIONER SUPPLIES 132142 AIR A WASTE MGMT. ASSOC. $420.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 132143 ALLIED SUPPLY CO $406.65 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 132144 AMER SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY 1360.00 LAB SUPPLIES 132145 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $8.590.65 - EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS - DIET 7 132146 BLAME P ANDERSON 3102.64 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE CHARGES 132147 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $335.CO SERVICES AGREEMENT 132148 ANTHONY•S HECK S MACHINL, INC. 1218.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 132149 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 62.047.74 NOTICES A ADS 132156 APPLIED BIDSVSTEMS INC $1.040.59 LAB SUPPLIES 132151 ABC LABORATORIES $235.00 LAB SERVICES 132152 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC S6.986.96 WASTE HAULING IT1 132153 ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES $1,218.00 LAB SUPPLIES X 132154 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING 57.900.00 SOIL TESTING 132155 OFT PORTABLE SERVICES S101.54 RENTAL EQUIPMENT CO 132156 BMM LANDFILL $4.069.36 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 132157 BRW SAFETY 8 SUPPLY $2,623.02 SAFETY SUPPLIES -I L32158 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS 6149.DO PUBLICATION n 132159 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $731.03 BATTERIES 132160 BAUER COMPRESSOR 6126.59 COMPRESSOR PARTS I-+ 132161 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC $4,254.02 LAB SUPPLIES 132162 BON C BEATTIE P.E. 1400.CO PIPING 132163 BENTLEY NEVADA $061.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 132164 BID TECH NET, INC S89.79 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 132165 SISHOP'S SANITARY RAINY SUP 1263.77 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 132166 - BOEHRINGER MANNHEIM $334.48 LAB SUPPLIES 132167 BOISE CASCADE OFC PRODUCTS S3.431.48 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132168 SOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $119.89 RADIATOR REPAIRS 132169 BON-A-RUES S157.33 TRUCK PARTS 132170 BODY BARN $121.12 SAFETY SHOES 132171 BORNEMANN PUMPS, INC 5407.17 PUMP PARTS 132172 BUILDER'S EMPORIUM S294.26 HARDWARE 132173 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE 455.92 TRAINING VIDEO RENTAL 132174 BURKE ENGINEERING CO S226.19 MECHANICAL PARTS 132275 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC $16.252.06 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 132176 CH2M HILL 148,502.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-31 132177 C M 1 $3,909.17 METER 132178 CALTROL INC 124.15C.:1 MECHANICAL PARTS 132179 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 9128.668.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-33, PI-36 132180 CENTREPOINT COMMERCIAL TNT 64.154.00 OFFICE FURNITURE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/01/93 PAGE c REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/08/93 POSTING DATE 09/08/93 - .I WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132181 CENTURY SAFETY INST 6 SUPP $13.336.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES 132182 CHROME CRANKSHAFT INC 4950.00 MECHANICAL PARTS I, 132163 THE COBS GROUP $99.00 TECHNICAL JOURNAL 132185 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO $311.25 LAB SUPPLIES 132185 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 3960.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 232186 COMPUSA. INC. $1,689.27 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 132187 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $9.147.84 ELECTRIC PARTS 132196 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $721.56 TOOLS 132189 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $1,616.25 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 132190 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC $621.34 ELECTRICAL PARTS 132191 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 9186.46 TRUCK PARTS 132192 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $1.576.19 ELECTRIC PARTS 132293 DE ANIA CORPORATION 1450.OJ RENTAL EQUIPMENT 132194 HSK/DECKER $296.04 GAUGE 132195 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS 3189.53 LAB SUPPLIES 132196 OICKSONS S2.15C.69 APPLIANCE 132197 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP $5,468.24 COMPUTER SOFTWARE m 132199 DISCO PRINT COMPANY S195.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES X 132199 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE 1N $6,131.58 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL Z 132200 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $4,910.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 8 REPAIRS 232201 DOYER ELEVATOR YA TOR COMPANY $1.690.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 132202 DUNN EDWARDS CORP $157.05 FITTINGS 132203 D."LS SALES 3302.34 FITTINGS 132204 E.C.S. 1364.06 PUBLICATION n 132205 TIMID PROCESS EQUIP CO $1,874.85 MECHANICAL PARTS TJ 132206 ESP NORTH $915.09 FRIGHT 132207 EASTMAN INC $1,969.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES 13220E ECOANALYSIS INC $11,405.15 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.1-13-93 132209 ENCHANTER INC 34.40D.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 132210 ENERGY SAYINGS SYSTEM $916.00 ELECTRICAL PARTS 132211 ESSENCE GROUP $26.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132212 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S1.560.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 132213 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP $331.50 AIR FREIGHT 132214 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO 3504.13 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 132215 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO S710.21 LAB SUPPLIES 132216 FISONS INSTRUMENTS 32.i00.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 132217 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. 3205.00 CONCRETE CUTTING 232218 FLO-SYSTEMS $1.504.43 PUMP PARTS 132219 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC $153.10 LAB SUPPLIES 132220 CLIFFORD A FORKERT $lb.381.75 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 232221 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 3181.02 PAINT SUPPLIES 132222 THE FOXBORO CO 336.C9 . INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 132223 FREEWAY TRUCK PARTS 3711.4E TRUCK PARTS 132224 GST. INC. $2,127.15 COMPUTER PARTS 132225 6AMAHL LUMBER CO 1802.33 HARDWARE 132226 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1.594.70 CHEMICALS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9101/93 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/08/93 POSTING DATE U9/08/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT UESCRIPTION 132227 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS 52.550.Ou AIR DUCTING REPAIRS 132220 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 92.077.77 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 132229 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $412.2G TELEPHONE SERVICES 132230 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC S7.467.01 MECHANICAL PARTS 132231 GILSON MEDICAL ELECTRONICS 91,044.75 LAB SUPPLIES 132232 WW GRAINGER INC $75.61 TRUCK PARTS 132233 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $4,423.70 FILM 132234 GRASSY S.T.I. 32.655.18 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132235 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 4100.40 TRUCK PARTS 132236 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC 31.488.4o SCRUBBER PARTS 132237 HATCH 4 KIRK INC 3625.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 132238 HAUSER ENGINEERING $5.167.69 LAB SERVICES 132239 HAWKINS ACCOCIATES 11.323.00 MACHINE REPAIRS 132240 PL HAWN CO INC $659.72 ELECTRIC PARTS 132241 E0 HELLER•S SON INC $63.16 TOOLS 132242 HELLO $63.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132243 HEWLETT PACKARD $727.00 SERVICE AOREBMH T m 132244 HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY $721.95 LAB SUPPLIES 2 132245 HOERSIGER CYS CALIF INC 3289.44 VALVES 132246 HOLMES 6 NARVER INC 581.147.63 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-44 by 132247 RODNEY HUNT CO 311.200.61 MECHANICAL PARTS 132248 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 321.699.50 WATER USE --1 132249 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $223.27 HARDWARE _ n 232250 HYCLONE LABORATORIES INC $510.02 LAB SUPPLIES 132251 ICC INSTRUMENT $38.50 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES "4 132252 IDN CONTROLS INC $965.31 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132253 IMAGING PLUS SOLO.06 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 132254 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $29,804.24 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 132255 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 3709.68 CORRECTORS 13225E ISI INFORTEXT 41,301.00 HARDWARE 132257 INGRAM PAPER 3116.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132258 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $94.00 TRUCK PARTS 132259 INSIDE C.F.A. $455.00 SUBSCRIPTION 132260 INVITROGEN 3127.67 LAB SUPPLIES 132261 J A N S 517.275.UU ARBITRATION SERVICES - 3-19A 132262 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 3696.17 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 132263 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO 9101.28 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132264 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $695.35 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 132265 KEENAN SUPPLY $143.54 VALVES 132266 THE KEITH COMPANIES $10.632.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-36R 132267 KING BEARING INC $3.955.16 MACHINE SUPPLIES 13226E KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $6,940.16 SAFETY SUPPLIES 132269 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS S15C.32 PUMP PARTS 132270 LA PALMA ROYALE, INC. 5229.35 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 132271 LAYMAN. JONES 6 DYE. LAWYERS $9,434.50 LEGAL SERVICES - J-19A 132272 LEGI-TECH $320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES M.0.5-13-92 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/01/93 PAGE 4 REPDRT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .,.� CLAIMS PAID G9/0B/93 POSTING DATE 09/0e/93 I' WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132273 LECO CORPORATION $9,040.6. SERVICE AGREEMENT. 132274 LEE A NO CONSULTING ENGR 151,905.86 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5 132275 CRC PRESS INC. $80.45 PUBLICATION 132276 KP LINDSTROM INC 52.386.70 EMPIRE. CONSULTING SERVICES M.0.10-10-90 132277 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL 63.104.40 OCEAN MONITORING 132278 MOT BIOLOGIC COMPANY S477.0N SERVICE AGREEMENT 132279 MPS 4784.12 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 1322PO MACOMCO $520.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT 132281 MANLEY-S BOILER REPAIR CO. INC $2,968.52 BOILER REPAIRS 132282 MARGATE CONSTRUCTION INC $275.976.31 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-2 132283 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $63.85 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIER 132284 MARVAC SCIENTIFIC $49.10 LAB SUPPLIES 132285 MATHESON GAS PRODUCTS $417.35 SPECIALTY OASES 132286 MICROAGE S253.21 COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK PART 232287 MIDWAY MFG 4 MACHINING S6.832.88 PUMP PARTS 132288 RILLIPORE CURP/WATERS CHROMA D $151.54 LAB SUPPLIES 132289 MINCO PRODUCTS $529.81 ELECTRICAL PARTS 13229E MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $:,096.56 HARDWARE FT1 132291 MISSION INDUSTRIES 11,626.39 UNIFORM RENTALS X 132292 MOLECULAR PROBES. INC S398.01 LAB SUPPLIES = 132293 MORTON SALT AND/OR $479.93 SALT etl 132294 NASCO WEST INC 3150.87 LAB SUPPLIES 132295 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY $218.09 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES --4 132296 NEAL SUPPLY CO $2.232.81 PLUMBING SUPPLIES a 132297 NESLAB INSTRUMENTS $88.77 LAB SUPPLIES 132298 CITY OF NEWFORT BEACH 518.31 WATER USAGE t 132299 NUTECH CORPORATION $4,800.00 LAB SUPPLIES 132300 OK SYSTEMS CO $14.689.81 CHLORINE M.0.11-18-92 132301 ORANGE COUNTY AU10 PARTS C $116.56 TRUCK PARTS 132302 ORANGE COURIER S280.6J FREIGHT 132303 ORANGE VALVE N FITTING CO. $415.97 FITTINGS 1323Q4 OXYGEN SERVICE 32,601.9% SPECIALTY GASES 132305 COUNTY OF ORANGE $3,934.34 SERVICE AGREEMENT - RADIOS 132306 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRIC 65,834.97 UV PILOT STUDY AGREEMENT 132307 PGC SCIENTIFICS CORPORATION $161.65 LAB SUPPLIES 132308 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 9506.25 SAFETY SUPPLIES 132309 PACIFIC BELL 6651.27 TELEPHONE SERVIC80 132310 PACIFIC WATER CUNOITIONING C S108.4G RENTAL EQUIPMENT 132321 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $4.713.16 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 132312 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPP $1,993.16 - JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 132313 PAGENET $96.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 132314 PAK WEST S566.44 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 132315 PALMIERI. TYLER, WIENLR. 1389.35 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.6-12-91 132316 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICE! 132317 PARKSON CORPORATION $6.567.57 HARDWARE 132316 PASCAL E LU061G S205.459.30 CONSTRUCTION P2-43-1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/01/93 PAGE 5 RLPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID U9108/93 POSTING DATE 09/08/93 C WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132319 PERNIN-ELMER CORFORATION $23.234.11 SERVICE AGREEMENT 132320 PERDAIDATION SYSTEMS INC 53.08.04 CHEMICALS 132321 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $158,566.53 REBIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.5-8-91 232322 PLAN-SAX 1483.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132323 FOLYPURE INC 19.222.01 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 132324 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $665.60 ICE 132325 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. 11,110.34 SOIL TESTING 132326 OHS INC S1.749.40 SERVICE AGREEMENT 13232? RPS INDUSTRIES s210.98 LAB SUPPLIES 132320 RANDOM CONSTR. CO. 5536.45 EMERGENCY SEWER RBPAIRB - DIST 7 132329 RED WING SHOES $124.13 SAFETY SHOES 132330 TRV-REDI PROPERTY DATA S758.48 PROPERTY DATA INDBABB 132331 MCJUNMIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $3.599.07 VALVES 132332 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CORP S3g3.25 LAB SUPPLIES 132333 RESTER CORP S197.78 BOORS 132334 HOWARD RIDLEY CO. sb00.OD CONCRETE REPAIRS . 132335 ROGERS PRODUCTS CO 13.127.86 OFFICE EQUIPMENT FTT 132336 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL s1.747.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS X 132337 JOSEPH T RYERSON S SON IN $2,523.99 BELT PRS88 PARTS = 132338 S.S. MECHANICAL 19.608.CC MECHANICAL REPAIRS 132339 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $763.26 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS CO 132340 SANTA ANA RIVER FLOOD $1,250.40 MEMBERSHIP DUES 132341 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1,117.14 FITTINGS 232342 DOUG SARVIS 51.125.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING a 132343 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES INC 1491.34 SPECIALTY GASES 1 132305 SNAMROCM SUPPLY S1.925.91 TOOLS 13234 SNIP HERD MAC MINERT CO 3134.63 ENGINE PARTS 132346 SHURELUCM SALES s5.922.83 MECHANICAL PARTS 132347 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $492.00 PERMIT FEES 132348 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 910.454.32 POWER 132349 SO CAL GAS CO $2.128.96 NATURAL OAS 132350 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CD $12.565.63 DIESEL/UNLBADED FUEL 132351 VESTALLOT INC $66.26 WELDING SUPPLIES 132352 SPECTRUM CHEMICAL $53.24 LAB SUPPLIES 132353 JAMES STEFFEN $3.571.82 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 132354 GARY G STREED $4,964.21 REIMS PETTY CASH, TRAVEL A TRAINING 132355 SUNSET FORD 3163.87 TRUCE PARTS 132357 SUPELDD INC 1333.5E LAB SUPPLIES 132358 SUPER ICE CLRP a$93.90 LAB SUPPLIES 132359 SUPER [CE CORPINDUSTRIAL 547.72 LAB SUPPLIES SUP 132360 T l C IROBBINS L CONTROLS. $5.021.13 VEHICLE SUPPLIES 232361 THOMPORESON INDUSTRIAL FORD $5.021.13 VEHICLE RENTALS 132362 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY OU $11090.02 MECHANICAL SOPPLIgS 132363 THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP 5227.0C PUBLICATION 132J63 TONT•S LDER A SAFE SERVICE 1778.b9 pg-RBY LOCKS 132364 TOYD LANDSCAPING CO Sq.024.4C CONTRACT GROUNDSAEEPING M.0.1-13-92 FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/01/93 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY { CLAIMS PAID C9/08/93 POSTING DATE 09/08/93 I• WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132365 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE INC. $370.78 TRUCK PARTS 132366 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES f1.0G 3.eG TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-9-93 132367 TREBOR ELECTRONICS 6955.83 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 132368 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY INC f58C.96 TRUCK PARTS 132369 TUSTIN DODGE f5.66 TRUCK PARTS 132370 US AUTO GLASS CENTERS 439.27 TRUCK PARTS 132371 US WATER NEWS f99.04 SUBSCRIPTION 132372 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE f92T..1 PARCEL SERVICES 132373 UNITED TOWING SERVICE $450.04 TRUCK PARTS 132374 VON SCIENTIFIC $1.219.71 LAB SUPPLIES 132375 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $3,271.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 132376 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 5614.37 LAB SUPPLIES 132377 VERTEX SYSTEMS 11.592.83 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 132379 VILLAGE NURSEFILS SZ4.43 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 132379 CARL WARREN 6 CO $2,119.60 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADJUSTER 132380 WECO INDUSTRIES. INC. fi.658.21 MANHOLE COVER 132301 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 610,309.92 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 132382 WESTERN TAP MANUFACTURING $107.83 TOOL m 132383 WITEG f172.94 LAB SUPPLIES X 132304 ROURKE 6 WOODRUFF 6 SPRADLIN 159.353.16 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 = 132385 WORDPERFECT CORP $159.OC PUBLICATION 132366 XEROX CORP 617.612.00 COPIER LEASES 132387 E.L. YEAGER CONSTRUCTION CO $41.008.CC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES M.O.3-10-93 - 1 132388 ZIEBARTN 6 ALPER/C.S. ALPER 1119.257.UC CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 a ----------------- CT TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09/08/93 31.98V.076.16 FUND NO 9199 - ST DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/01/93 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/08/93 POSTING DATE 09/08/93 SUMMARY AMOUNT NI OPER FUND $7.10 •1 CAP FAC FUND $41,000.00 42 OPER FUND $426.03 42 CAP FAC FUND $7,900.00 93 OPER FUND $12,239.59 43 CAP PAC FUND $21,928.43 45 OPER FUND $1,435.75 45 CAP PAC FUND $7,162.34 96 OPER FUND $2.93 17 OBER FUND $13,464.67 47 CAP PAC FUND $1,884.00 111 OPER FUND $33.71 014 CAP PAC FUND $389.25 0566 OPEN FUND $2,110.52 6566 CAP FAC FUND 31,000.00 m t667 OPER FUND $2,603.36 X 47614 OPER FUND �489$ .9 1114= TT OPER FUND CORP $1,199,464.73 SELF FUNDED INNS SAMCE FUNDS $7,735.27 -� 3T DIET WORKING CAPITAL FUND $169,607.81 -------------- a � 71.B80,076.16 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL , PROCESSING DATE 9/15193 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 69/22/93 POSTING DATE 09/22/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132406 ACR MECHANICAL CORP $3,240.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 132407 AG TECH COMPANY 467.992.6. RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 132400 A T L T 94.020.27 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 132409 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP s23T.OG DOOR REPAIRS 132410 AIR PRODUCTS L CHEMICAL 1N $34.064.00 OAM AGREEMENT OKY GEN SYST M.O.8-9-89 132411 ALTON BED SCIENCE 4139.3C LAB SERVICES 132412 AMER SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY $134.40 LAB SUPPLIES 132413 AMICON. INC $617.:9 LAB SUPPLIES 132414 ANIKTER - DISTRIBUTION $106.5U OFFICE EQUIPMENT 132415 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL 1315..1 SERVICE AGREEMENT 132416 APCO VALVE S PRIMER CORP 4210.06 VALVE PARTS 132417 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS INC $306.00 LAB SUPPLIES 132410 ARATER SERVICES INC s9.000.O6 CLAIM SETTLEMENT 132419 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $880.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS m 132420 ARMOR - VAC s1.930.60 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES X 132421 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD 1 $116.37 BUILDING MATERIALS = 132422 RANDOLPH AUSTIN CO 5496.37 LAB SUPPLIES 132423 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSINb a5.3C2A63 PAYROLL SERVICES 132424 BKK LANDFILL $4,517.61 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 132425 B.M.1. 5268.10 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132426 BRV SAFETY L SUPPLY 32, C07.12 SAFETY SUPPLIES tz 232427 BANANA BLUEPRINT 34.715.35 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES 11 132428 BATTERY SPECIALTIES iT21.95 BATTERIES 132429 :ARTER 014GN08T1 CS INC s8.820.87 LAB BOPPLI EB 132430 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES INC. $560.45 TRUCK WASH TICKETS 132431 810 VENTURES INC $162.00 LAB SUPPLIES 132432 POISE CASCADE OFC PRODUCTS $2.434.12 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132433 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $78.95 RADIATOR REPAIRS 132434 BON-A-RUES $65.76 TRUCK PARTS 132435 BRENNER-FIEDLER L ASSOC IN $463.62 LAB SUPPLIES 132436 BRISTOLITE SKYLIGHTS 5182.10 SKYLIGHT 132437 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $1.559.88 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 132438 BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTANTS $5.698.76 MARINE MONITORING PROGRAM 132439 C. J. BRUYN $861.00 LAB SUPPLIES 232440 BUDGET JANITORIAL s6.300.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 132441 THE BURKE COMPANY $539.66 PAINT SUPPLIES 132442 CEM CORPORATION $28.02 LAB SUPPLIES 132443 C M 1 3123.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132444 CPC PRESS INC 3492.16 LAB SUPPLIES 132445 CS COMPANY $3,919.03 VALVES 132446 CALTROL INC a1.686.02 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132447 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC s1,132.75 TRUCK PARTS 132448 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GALE $790.32 SERVICE AGREEMENT 232449 CAPITAL WESTWARD 3172.96 MECHANICAL PARTS 132450. JOHN CAROLLO ENUINEERS $19.193.81 ENGINEERING SNRVICES P1-38 132451 CASE POWER L EQUIPMENT $971.97 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT OIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/15/93 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS DF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/22/93 POSTING DATE 09/22/93 %ARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132452 CASHCO INC $368.28 MECHANICAL PARTS 132453 ROT/CASTLE 3300.90 LAB SUPPLIES 132454 CENTURY PAINT s515.05 PAINT SUPPLIES 132455 CENTURY SAFETY INST S BUFF $2,203.88 SAFETY SUPPLIES 132456 CHAMPION FENCE CO 5616.0G FENCING SUPPLIES 132457 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $05.99 SERVICE AGREEMENT - 132458 LORETTA L COFFMAN s454.0C THOMAS GUIDE 132459 COLIC% AND SONS 31.70.593.00 CONSTRUCTION I-9 132460 COMMERCIAL DOOR OF O.C.. INC. $187.79 DOOR REPAIRS 132461 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $3097.81 COMPRESSOR PARTS 132462 CONPUS6. INC. $1,151.41 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 132463 COMPUSERVE S115.06 COMPUTER SERVICES 132464 CONNELL GH PARTS / DIV $7.16 TRUCK PARTS 132465 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL UIST ST.725.45 ELECTRIC PARTS 13246E CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $81.94 TOOLS m 132467 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS 31,952.92 LAB SUPPLIES X 132466 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC 36,914.93 ELECTRICAL PARTS = 132469 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 5163.36 TRUCK PARTS 232470 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $19930,47 ELECTRIC PARTS 232471 CHARLES P CROWLEY CO $1.192.74 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132472 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 17.131.00 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 232473 DANCO METAL SURFACING $3,000.00 ECSA DEPOSIT 132474 DAPPER TIRE $223.39 TRUCK PARTS 132475 HSK/DECKER $455.69 GAUGE CJ 132476 BE GUELLE 6 SONS GLASS CO $256.17 BUILDING REPAIRS 132477 DELPHIN COMPUTER SUPPLY $61.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132418 0IATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $7.136.3C ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-12-92 132479 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $62.42 LAB SUPPLIES 132480 0161TAL EQUIPMENT CORP 944,911.26 INSTRUMENTS 1324P1 MICHAEL F DILLON $2,500.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 132482 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC 51.938.50 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 132483 GUNNEL BROS MACH MOVING $500.00 STORAGE FEES 232484 DUNN EDWARDS CORP $345.66 PAINT SUPPLIES 139485 ESP NORTH $707.03 TOOLS 132486 EASTMAN INC $4,781.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132487 ECOANALYSIS INC $690.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 132486 ELECT AIR TOOL CO 324.31 CONVEYOR PART 132489 ENCHANTER INC $4.48O.G0 OCEAN MONITORING H.0.6-30-92 232499 ENVIRDNETICS. INC $585.15 LAB SUPPLIES 132491 ESSENCE GROUP sq.B49.G4 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 132492 EUROTHERM RECORDERS INC 9401.54 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132493 F51 SAND AND GRAVEL INC Sa66.72 ROAD SASE 132494 MARSHALL FAIRRES 3IS.G8 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 132495 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5,346.85 RESIDUALS REMOVAL N.0.10-10-91 132496 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP *612.00 AIR FREIGHT 132497 FENNWOOD MOBILE HOME PARK 38.518.24 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST HORNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/15193 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/22/93 POSTING DATE U9/22/93 I, WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132490 FERRELLGAS 5129.57 PROPANE 132499 FIDELITY TRUST COMPANY $37,263.43 DRPBRRSD COMP WITHDRAWAL 132500 FISCHER 8 PORTER CO $220.57 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132501 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 3165.I8 LAB SUPPLIES 132502 FLO-SYSTEMS $1.215.23 PUMP PARTS 132503 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA S16D.91 FILM 132504 THE FORBORO CO 51.673.01 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 132505 FREDSON RV SUPPLY 553.2b TRUCK PARTS 132506 FREEDOM IMAGING $196.39 SERVICE AGREEMENT 132507 GMC TRUCK 6 BUS GROUP $71,063.28 COHNITER VANE M.O.6-9-93 132508 GST, INC. 57.139.01 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 132509 GANANL LUMBER CO 9142.12 LUMBER 132520 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 5701.88 ELECTRIC PARTS 132511 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $4.491.94 TELEPHONE SERVICES ITT 132512 GIERLICH-MITCNELL INC 11.296.75 PUMP PARTS X 132513 BON GREEN 6 ASSOCIATES $11.736.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 2 132514 GUARANTY CHEVROLET MOTORS $30.853.14 TRUCKS 132515 NO TYPE A GRAPHICS 384.05 PRINTING 132516 HACH COMPANY 11.696.09 LAB SUPPLIES . 132517 FRED A HARPER S1.500.00 DRFERRBD COMP DISTRIBUTION 132518 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC s904.54 FITTINGS 132519 HATCH A MIRK INC 51.276.68 TOOLS W 132520 HAULAYAY CONTAINERS $1,100.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 132521 PL HAWN CO 'INC s19.7B ELECTRIC PARTS 132522 HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT Sb.250.00 WORKERS COMP ADMINISTRATOR 132523 HILTI INC 5637.88 TOOLS 132524 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC 3139.13 MECHANICAL PARTS 132525 R. C. HOFFMAN CO.. INC. 974.40 LAB SUPPLIES 132526 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO 5172.40 LAB SUPPLIED 132527 HOLMES S NARVER INC $121.925.64 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-86 132520 RS HUSHES CO INC 91.055.32 SAFETY SUPPLIES 132529 HUNTER CORPORATION 994.396.61 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 132530 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA 5131.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132531 HYCLONE LABORATORIES INC $510.79 LAB SUPPLIES 132532 TOM CONTROLS INC $543.65 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132533 IEEE SERVICE CENTER - C87 s335.02 PUBLICATION 132534 IDEA MAN. INC $1.309.50 RIDESHARING PROMOTIONS 132535 IDEAL ELECTRIC 55.755.59 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 132536 IMAGING PLUS 516.373.66 - OFFICE EQUIPMENT 132537 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL $37.493.65 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92 132538 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 4131.99 ASPHALT 132539 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.384.13 CONNECTORS 132540 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 5508.19 BATTERIES 132541 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $196.84 WATER 132542 J b W SCIENTIFIC S40.83 LAB SUPPLIES 132543 JLA CREDIT CORP $264.32 MICROFICHE HERDER LEASE FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9115/93 PAGE 9 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTV SAN17ATION DISTRICTS OF ORAN6E COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/22/93 POSTING DATE 09/22/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132599 J.P.L. CONSULTING SERVICE 5985.95 CONSULTING SERVICES 132535 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 5596.83 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 132546 JAVAID CONTRACTORS INC 5123.170.39 CONSTRUCTION P2-23-5-1 132547 JAY-S CATERING $673.45 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES 132588 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 4359.78 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 132549 KAMAN BEARINGS W SUPPLY 579.51 MECHANICAL PARTS 132550 KING BEARING INC SBbl.46 MACHINE SUPPLIES 132551 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $8,956.15 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 132552 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO $299.E9 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 132553 LAYMAN. JONES A DYE. LAWYERS S431.57 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.5-13-92 132554 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO 520.24 TRUCE REPAIRS 132555 LIESERT CORPORATION $18.216.VU SERVICE AGREEMENT 132556 MP LINDSTROM INC 41.140.0U ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES 132557 SOCO-LYNCH CORP $540.92 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 132558 MPS S108.86 PHOTO SERVICES FT7 132559 RANTER $619.19 PAINT SUPPLIES = 132560 MARVAC- ELECTRONICS $54.97 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES - 132561 MATT CHLOP INC $1.169.06 CHLORINATION PARTS 132562 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO 5152.b0 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 132563 MEMOREX $399.88 LAB SUPPLIES 132564 MERIDIAN DIAGNOSTICS INC. 3265.75 CAR SUPPLIER GJ 132565 MICROAGE OF CERRITOS $2.575.89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1 132566 MICROAGE 519.017.89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT r 132567 MICROBICS CORPORATION $290.66 CHEMICALS 132566 MIDLAND MFG CORP 3101.74 CHLORINATION PARTS 132569 MIDWAY MFG L MACHINING $2,195.00 PUMP PARTS 132570 MILLIPORE CORP/WATERS CMRONA U 579.506.68 IJR EQUIPMENT 132571 MINNESOTA WESTERN VISUAL PRES. 5169.53 LAB SUPPLIES 132572 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES 5360.13 MACHINE PARTS 132573 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.879.54 UNIFORM RENTALS 132579 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $1,274.95 LAB SERVICES 132575 MOORE INDUSTRIES 5769.8E ELECTRICAL PARTS 132576 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC $430.17 MECHANICAL PARTS 132577 NASCO WEST INC $151.55 LAB SUPPLIES 132578 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICLS INC 52.935.00 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 132579 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTAL 132580 NEAL SUPPLY CO $1.178.07 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 132581 NESLAB INSTRUMENTS $2.556.75 LAB EQUIPMENT 132582 NETWORK GENERAL 329.762.2G TEST EQUIPMENT 132583 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES $237.97 SAFETY GLASSES 132584 OX SVSIEMS CO $30.231.18 CHLORINE M.0.11-18-92 1325P5 ORACLE CORPORATION 51.050.00 132596 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C S223.58 TRAINING TSOIeRRATION TRUCK PARTS 132588 ORANGE COURIER ,801$133.97 FREIGHT 1325 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $1.801.97 SPECIALTY 132569 OXV6EN SERVICE 3:.8J 7.09 Spec IALTY GASES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9115/93 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/22/93 POSTING DATE 09/22/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132590 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 510.477.46 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 132591 PSI s140.08 MECHANICAL PARTS 132592 PSOCIPOOL SUPPLV OF OCI $55.26 MACHINE PARTS 132593 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $364.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 132595 PACIFIC PARTS $6,972.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132595 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $1.054.00 SAFETY SUPPLIER 132596 PACIFIC BELL $14.49 TELEPHONE SERVICES 132597 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C $168.40 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 132598 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $32.83 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 132599 PADRE JANITORIAL SUFP $694.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 132600 FAINE WEBBER 530.112.50 COP REMARKETING 132601 PALMIERI. TYLER. 61ENER. s203.Y0 LEM SERVICES M.O.6-12-91 132602 PARTS UNLIMITED 5938.61 TRUCK PARTS 132603 ROY PENDERGRAFT 3460.0E DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION m 132604 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $177.46 LAB SUPPLIED X 132605 PERORIDAIION SYSTEMS INC S1U.476.02 CERMICALB S 132606 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC 3169,962.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 1326C7 POLYPURE INC 523.370.89 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 13260E POSITIVE FORMULATORS. INC. $252.20 CHEMICALS 132609 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO 5113.21 ELECTRIC PARTS 132610 HAPOLD PRIM IC s70.00 ICE W 132611 MIKE PURLICH S SONS $41.359.5C 132612 QUESTRON CORP 32.165.00 CONSTRUCTION SUPPLIES 5-35-2 132613 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO $1.682.71 TRASH REMOVAL 132614 RAIMIN INSTRUMENT CO 31,516.08 LAB SUPPLIES 232615 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $6.581.41 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132616 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL 42.747.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132617 RYAN-NERCO S198.97 LAB SUPPLIES 132618 S.S. MECHANICAL 52.750.00 WATER PIPING INSTALLATION 132619 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $149.34 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 132620 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 4591.72 PLUMBING SUPPLIER 132621 DOUG SARVIS 3375.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 132622 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES INC S1.4T9.41 LAB SUPPLIES 132623 CITY OF SEAL BEACH 5253.40 WATER 132624 SECURITY SPECIALISTS 5160.00 BUILDING REPAIRS 132625 SELCO PRODUCTS CO $758.16 INSTRUMENT PARTS 132626 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 5281.19 TOOLS 132627 SHURELUCK SALES $1,330.11 TOOLS 132628 SIGMA CHEMICAL C0 s109.55 LAB BUPPLIBB 132629 SKALER. INC - $61,058.92 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 132630 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI 5695.OU PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 132631 SLATER WATERPRODFING. INC. 611,788.00 132632 SOIL MOISTURE CORP. $149.9- WATERPROOFING SERVICES 132633 SOLDER STATION R1 $390.93 LAB SUPPLIES REFUND USER PBB OVERPAYMENT PERMIT 132634 SO COAST AIR QUALITY s161.00 FEES 132635 SO CALIF ALLIANCE OF PUBLIC s500.00 MACT TECHNICAL REVIEW POND FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST YORKIN6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/15/93 PACE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 69/22/93 POSTING DATE 09/22/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 132636 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 564.582.91 POWER 132637 SO CAL GAS CO 3113.677.09 NATURAL GAS 132638 SO CALIF WATER CO $50.01 WATER USE 132639 SPARKLETTS ORINKING PATEN 32.368.56 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTAL 132640 STAMEN I SPASSOFF PE $1,680.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 132641 SPECTRO OIL PEST $70.9O OIL 132642 SPEX INDUSTRIES INC S1.aL2.11 LAB SUPPLIES 232643 GARY G STREEO $3,173.62 REIMB PETTY CASH, TRAVEL 6 TRAINING 132644 STROMBOTUE FRIN7IN6 S1.616.59 PRINTING 132645 SUMMIT STEEL s4.014.14 METAL 132646 SUNSET FORD 835.35 TRUCK PARTS 132647 TAILOR-DUNN NFG COMPANY 5264.15 TRUCK PARTS 132649 TELEDYNE ANALYTICAL INSTRMENTS 32.269.97 INSTRUMENT 132649 FM THOMAS AIR CONDITIONING SL.200.0G AIR CONDITION84 REPAIRS fTl 332650 TNOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5599.33 MACHINE SUPPLIER X 132651 TONY.S LOCK S SAFE SERVICE 9436.56 LOCK INSTALLATION = 132652 Toro LANDSCAPING CO 54.624.49 CONTRACT LANDSCAPING M.O.1-13-92 - 132653 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES 5577.V0 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-9-93 IA7 132654 TRUCK S AUTO SUPPLY INC 4364.80 TRUCK PARTS --1 232655 JG TUCKER a SO% INC 5476.98 MACHINE SUPPLIES 132656 UHLER, INC 5151.624.60 CONSTRUCTION 5-32, 5-33 w 132657 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC 91.207.00 LAB SUPPLIES 1 132658 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $500.76 PARCEL SERVICES 132659 VYR SCIENTIFIC $3.245.12 LAB SUPPLIES 132660 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 37.826.15 PIPE 132662 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS 8755.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES 132662 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 5150.28 LAB SUPPLIES 132663 VERTEX SYSTEMS 55.535.UO COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 132664 WANED MEDICAL PARTNERSHIP 5219.37 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 132665 WEIGH IRONY). INC. S2.801.46 TRUCK SCALE PARTS 13266E YES CON ELECTRIC f30.00 PLANS 6 SPECS REFUND 132667 WEST COAST TERMINALS INC $180.00 MACHINE REPAIRS 132668 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 341,393.62 CAUSTIC BODA M.O.8-12-92 132669 NEROX CORP $150.31 COPIER LEASES 132670 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $1,452.59 PUMP PARTS _ 232671 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP $2.090.01 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 132672 RICHARD B EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COKP DISTRIBUTION ---------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09/22/93 $2.067.715.53 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITALPROCESSING DATE 9/15/93 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/22/93 POSTING DATE 09/22/93 i SUMMARY AMOUNT 11 OPEN FUND $5,304.52 92 OPEN FUND $14,552.94 92 CAP FAC FUND $11,834.99 13 OPER FUND $25,763.67 13 CAP FAC FUND $6,456.00 95 OPEN FUND $5,972.12 /5 CAP FAC FUND $184,518.89 96 OPEN FUND - $332.72 17 OPEN FUND $2,670.53 $7 CAP PAC FUND $183.69 $11 OPEN FUND $7,454.17 414 OPEN FUND $32.40 m 014 CAP FAC FUND $5,495.31 X 13611 OPEN FUND $2,335.00 t5A6 OPEN FUND $1,228.01 Ip f5A6 CAP FAC FUND $8,874.45 /7614' OPER FUND $5,212.94 -� JT OPEN FUND $695,926.02 CORP $905,606.28 i SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $15,250.00 V JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $162,630.28 ______________ $2,067,715.53