The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1993-06-09 fhTlpt COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 6127,FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92709-7019 p44hp, (714)962-2411 June 3, 1993 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS, 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY. JUNE 9. 1993 - 7:30 P.M. 108" Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Califomia The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. 4 Assistant r ecretary Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetinas: JOINT WORKS - Wednesday, June 23rd, at 4:30 p.m. SELECTION COMMITTEE (immediately preceding the Executive Committee meeting) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, June 23rd, at 5:30 p.m. ENGINEERING AND - Tuesday, June 29th, at 4:30 p.m. CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE SPECIAL JOINT WORKS - Tuesday, June 29th, at 6:00 p.m. SELECTION COMMITTEE RE COMPUTERS CENTRAL POWER GENERATION - Wednesday, June 30th, at 4:30 p.m. FACILITY DEDICATION AT PLANT NO. 1 DISTRICTS 1 6 7 - (Date to be determined. Tentatively, `� SELECTION COMMITTEE June 15 is suggested) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 2f ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 101W ELLI6 AVENUE c.0.9ox 812' Po NTAIN VALLEY,C LIFORNIA 92 01418622<tt JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings June Jun 09, 1993 Jun 23, 1993 July Jul 14, 1993 Jul 28, 1993 August Aug 11, 1993 None Scheduled September Sep 08, 1993 Sep 22, 1993 October Oct 13, 1993 Oct 27, 1993 November Nov 10, 1993 None Scheduled December Dec 08, 1993 None Scheduled January Jan 12, 1994 Jan 26, 1994 February Feb 09, 1994 Feb 23, 1994 March Mar 09, 1994 Mar 23, 1994 April Apr 13, 1994 Apr 27, 1994 May May 11, 1994 May 25, 1994 June Jun 08, 1993 Jun 22, 1993 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.10844 Ellls Avenue o1 Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92 728-81 2 7 Telephone:(714)962-2411 �. JOINT BOARDS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING JUNE 9, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. 16) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - May 12, 1993 regular District 2 - May 12, 1993 regular District 3 - May 12, 1993 regular District 5 - May 12, 1993 regular District 6 - May 12, 1993 regular District 7 - May 12, 1993 regular District 11 - May 12, 1993 regular District 13 - May 12, 1993 regular District 14 - May 12, 1993 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See pages "A" and "B" 05/05/93 05/19/93 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - S 925,761.41 $606,246.31 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,144,997.41 522,443.60 Joint Working Capital Fund - 4,856.44 12,508.12 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 166,996.29 158,466.00 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 9,009.70 500.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 37,407.00 158,234.60 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 52,656.17 26,034.15 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 63,693.06 11,494.69 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 6,438.92 26.34 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 11,433.62 8,520.17 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 12,269.37 16,107.81 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 102.28 .00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 601.64 1,762.35 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 151,338.13 181.38 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 32.83 2,702.18 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 15.26 7,082.40 $3.587.609.53 $1,532,310.10 -2- (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(a) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. �i Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation, rejecting the bid of Horizon High Reach Company as not meeting the specifications, and awarding Purchase of One Self- Propelled Aerial Work Platform, Specification No. E-231, to Western Pacific Equipment Company for a total amount not to exceed $81,795.00 plus sales tax. See page C (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Dionex Corporation in the amount of $40,150.00, plus sales tax and freight, for Purchase of Supercritical Fluid Extraction System, (Specification No. E-233)• (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Skalar, Inc. in the amount of $60,779.00, plus sales tax and freight, for Purchase of One Segmented Flow Analyzer Upgrade (Specification No. E-234). `" -3- (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) Idl Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Digital Equipment Corporation in the net amount of $34,984.48, plus sales tax and freight, for Purchase of Upgrade for Laboratory VAX 4000, Model 300 Computer System (Specification No. E-235). (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Millipore Corporation, Waters Chromatography Division in the amount of $73,363.70, plus sales tax and freight, for Purchase of High Pressure Liquid Chromatography System (Specification No. E-236). (f) Consideration of the following actions relative to Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044: (1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, making miscellaneous modifications and technical clarifications. (2) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, making miscellaneous modifications and revising the time for completion. (3) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-58, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, to Park Rose Construction, Inc., in the total amount of $199,200.00. See page D (g) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 22 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $8,251 .00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for two items of additional work. See page E (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-59, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-32, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount of $202,579.00. See page F -4- (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-60, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount of $235,900.00. See page G Q) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 9 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for a reallocation of costs among categories with no change in the maximum authorized compensation: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee and recommendation for said services. See page H (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-61, approving Addendum No. 9 to said agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for said services, providing for a reallocation of costs among categories within said agreement with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $4,471 ,136.00. See page I (k) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design and construction services, preparation of operations and maintenance manuals, and training services re Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 , Job No. P7-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, providing for modifications and changes to enhance the treatment process and provide operational flexibility and reliability for NPDES permit compliance: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee and recommendation for said services. See page J (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-62, approving Addendum No. 2 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $303,680.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $5,178,073.00 to an amount not to exceed $5,481,753.00. See page K -5- (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (1) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to execute Gas Service Agreements and Contracts for Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2, for the purchase of natural gas from the Southern California Gas Company, for the period January 1, 1993 to August 1, 1995, in form approved by General Counsel. (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-63 , approving First Amended and Restated Agreement for Utilization of Reclaimed Wastewater with the Orange County Water District (OCWD), providing up to 50 mgd of secondary effluent to OCWD for recycling purposes at no charge, with a provision to, at any time, reevaluate the valuation and pricing for secondary effluent; and to provide for purchase of GAP water at the audited cost to operate and maintain the GAP facility with a provision that the Districts' cost would not exceed the 0&M cost or the lowest cost of any GAP customer, for a 20-year period, in form approved by the General Counsel. See page L (n) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in various training programs, meetings, hearings, conferences facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by organizations providing specific training, state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Environment Federation; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1993-94. DISTRICTS 1 & 2 (o) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, authorizing a net addition of $45,858.11 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company for three items of additional or modified work, and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page M -6- (9) DISTRICT 7 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (p) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-73-7, approving plans and specifications for Abandonment of the Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (tentative bid date is July 13, 1993). See page N (q) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for design and construction services for Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -7- (11) ALL DISTRICTS Nominations for Joint Chairman (Election to be held at regular July Board Meeting) (12) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve staff Summary Financial Report for nine-month period ending March 31, 1993 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (13) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions in connection with Amendment No. 10 to Agreement with SAIC for ocean monitoring services relative to Districts' NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: (a) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Staff Report and Recommendation for NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program Year Nine (1993-94) and the Special Joint Works Selection Committee Certification of the negotiated fee and recommendation for Amendment No. 10 to Agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032 (Copies enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-64, approving Amendment No. 10 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, extending the contract from July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994, for an amount not to exceed $2,120,480.00 for Year Nine of said contract. See page Q -8- (14) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees' written reports of their meetings on May 19, 1993 and May 26, 1993, respectively (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said Committees: (1) Consideration of motion approving the all-risk property insurance program as follows: PROPERTY INSURANCE PROGRAM EXISTING RECOMMENDED (711/92-7193) (6/1/93-6/1/94) All Risk Including All Risk Including Terms Earthquake and Flood Earthquake and Flood Company Layered Program Layered Program Coverage Manuscript Manuscript All Risk Form All Risk Form $200,000,000 All Risk $200,000,000 All Risk $100,000,000 Earthquake $100,000,000 Earthquake $20,000,000 Deductible Cap 5% Deductible Premium $647,340 $1,000,000 to $1,100,000 (Including taxes and fees) (Including taxes and fees) (2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to direct Robert F. Driver Associates to place the Districts' all risk, earthquake and flood property insurance program within the above indicated parameters to the lowest cost and acceptable carriers. (3) Consideration of motion reaffirming existing policy of self- funding liability risk, and directing staff to target a combined insurance reserve addressing both property and liability exposures to achieve a $200 million target funding level, subject to annual budgetary and fee policy determinations by the Boards. [ITEM (14)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 103 -9- (14) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 9) Ibl 141 Consideration of motion to receive and file the Committees' report and recommendations re 1993-94 personnel requirements and joint works operating and construction budgets. (5) Consideration of actions re personnel requirements: (a) Consideration of motion approving 1993-94 personnel requirements. (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-65, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1993-94 personnel requirements. (6) Roll call vote motion approving proposed 1993-94 Joint Operating Budget Funds, as follows: Fund Total Amount Joint Operating/Working Capital $ 49,579,000 Workers' Compensation, Self-Insured 322,000.00 �✓ Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 3,594,000 Public Liability, Self-Insured 222,000 (7) Roll call vote motion approving proposed 1993-94 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORF Joint Works Construction) in the total amount of $70,032,000.00. [ITEM (14)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 111 -10- 0 (14) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from page 10) (b) (8) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP): (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-66, approving Letter Agreement with Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber, dated May 13, 1993, for underwriting services, whereby Merrill Lynch will receive an amount not to exceed 10 basis points, and will pay to PaineWebber the lesser of the present value of five basis points or one-half of the total spread per annum from the net spread, subject to final approval of the 1993 SWAP by the Boards. See page P (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-67, approving Letter Agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, dated May 12, 1993, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, based on standard hourly charges, for an amount not to exceed $15,000.00, subject to final approval of the 1993 SWAP by the Boards. See page ¢ (c) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-68, approving Memorandum Agreement with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, dated May 12, 1993, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, for a maximum fee not to exceed $5,000.00, subject to final approval of the 1993 SWAP by the Boards. See page R (9) Consideration of the following actions relative to Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1: (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-69, approving Letter Agreement with Merrill Lynch, dated May 13, 1993, for underwriting services, for an amount not to exceed $8.50 per $1,000 certificate for a fixed-rate structure, or $3.50 per $1,000 certificate for a synthetic fixed-rate structure, subject to final approval of the 1993 Series 1 by the Boards. See page S [ITEM (14)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 121 -11- 04) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 11) (b) (10) (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-70, approving Letter Agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, dated May 12, 1993, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, for a maximum fee not to exceed $60,000.00 plus expenses for a fixed advance refunding structure, or a maximum fee not to exceed $85,000 plus expenses for a synthetic fixed advance refunding structure, subject to final approval of the 1993 Series 1 by the Boards. See page T Ic) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-71, approving Memorandum Agreement with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, dated May 12, 1993, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, for a maximum fee not to exceed $5,000.00, subject to final approval of the 1993 Series 1 by the Boards. See page U (11) Consideration of motion approving Amendment No. 2 to the Districts' Employee Commuter Program, authorizing staff to purchase up to three additional rideshare vans to help meet Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) goals to comply with SCAOMD Rule 1503, for an amount not to exceed $78,000 plus sales tax and delivery. (12) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for Use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A, authorizing a net addition of $333,149.82 plus tax and freight to the contract with Cooper Industries for purchase of long- lead time spare parts and equipment to have adequate on-site inventory for needed system maintenance and repair. (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the Director of Finance to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1993, and declaring that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts until the 1993-94 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts. -12- (16) ALL DISTRICTS • Consideration of the following actions relative to Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-38-2: (a) Verbal report of Staff (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project to add Primary Influent Splinter Box at Clarifiers 6-15 modifications, and making miscellaneous technical clarifications. (c) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, clarifying temporary pumping instructions during Metering and Diversion Structure gate replacement, and making miscellaneous technical clarifications. (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-72, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-38-2, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount of $3,364,600.00. See page V (17) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee, compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session `..i (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. -13- (18) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (21) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (29) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn -14- (31) DISTRICT 11 �../ Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (33) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (34) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (35) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (36) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn -15- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE JUNE 9, 1993 AT 7:30 P.M. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self- explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a): AWARD OF ONE SELF-PROPELLED AERIAL WORK PLATFORM. SPECIFICATION NO. E-231. A self-propelled aerial work platform is used by the Operations, \/ Maintenance, Technical Services and Engineering Departments. It has an operating height in excess of 60 feet, and is used to perform repairs, inspections, calibrations, and testing on facilities such as piping, HVAC, lighting, scrubbers, flares, emissions testing equipment, etc. This unit will be replacing one that was purchased used in 1977, which can no longer be supported by factory parts making dealer certification impossible. As part of our program to comply with SCAQMD regulations, the Districts are purchasing this vehicle with an engine capable of operating on both gasoline and propane that will assist in meeting clean air goals. Sealed bids were received on May 18, 1993. Four bids were received. The bids ranged from a low bid of $74,330.00 to a high bid of $89,446.00, plus applicable sales tax. However, the bid received from Horizon High Reach Company did not meet the specified minimum height expansion and platform load capacity requirements. Staff therefore recommends that the Horizon bid be rejected and that award be made to Western Pacific Equipment Company, the lowest responsible bidder meeting the specifications, for the Purchase of One Self-Propelled Aerial Work Platform, Specification No. E-231, for the delivered price of $81,795.00, plus applicable sales tax. June 9, 1993 9(b): PURCHASE OF SUPER-CRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTION SYSTEM (SPECIFICATION NO. E-233). The Districts' NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit requires the routine monitoring of wastewater and sludge for more than 100 organic compounds from the EPA's priority pollutant list. Wastewater and sludge are sample matrices containing thousands of organic compounds. Since more than 60,000 compounds are in common use today, the combined waste streams entering the treatment plants are extremely complex. The greatest challenge to the environmental chemist is to sort these target pollutants out from the other myriad of chemicals present in the samples. The complexity of this challenge can best be explained by comparing to other industries like manufacturing or pharmaceutical where they are dealing with only a handful of compounds. The first and most important step in processing samples for priority pollutant analysis is the extraction of the target compounds from the rest of the sample. Unfortunately, during the extraction process, other compounds like lipids and fatty acids that are not on the target list are also extracted causing poor recoveries of the target compounds, interference and high noise levels. These poor recoveries, interferences and high noise levels then result in erroneous reporting of data and extremely high detection limits. As regulations become more strict, detection limits are being driven to lower levels and better identification of the target compounds is needed. In order to meet these requirements, better extraction efficiencies are needed with improved sample clean-up procedures. Traditionally, samples are extracted by physically shaking the sample with a non-polar solvent like methylene chloride or freon. These solvents are quite expensive because of the level of purity required, and once they are used they must be disposed of as a hazardous waste. Also, during the extraction period, some of the solvents are released Into the air through the Laboratory's hoods becoming part of Southern California's air pollution problem. Eventually, we will be faced with controlling these emissions. The US EPA is presently considering banning any use of these solvents with freon slated as first on the list. In addition to the problems associated with the use of solvents, these procedures are very labor-intensive and require approximately one hour of analyst time per sample processed. (The laboratory processes approximately 500 of these types of samples per year.) Recently, super-critical fluid extraction (SFE) technology has become commercially available. SFE has the potential to solve both problems described above because it can be automated and it uses only very small quantities of solvents as modifiers. SFE is a process that utilizes an inert gas (usually carbon -2. June 9, 1993 dioxide) that is raised above its critical temperature and pressure so that it acts chemically like a liquid and physically like a gas and becomes an excellent non-toxic solvent. This means that inexpensive carbon dioxide can be used as the extraction solvent. Moreover, since SFE is an automated process, utilizing SFE for the extraction of samples saves labor and it is estimated that SFE will save approximately .75 hours of labor per sample. The Districts' laboratory has evaluated three SFE systems; the Dionex 723, the Hewlett Packard 7680A and the Suprex PrepMaster. There are three critical components to these systems that each manufacturer approaches differently. First, a flow restrictor is required at the end of the flow path to maintain the more than 5,000 to 10,000 pounds of pressure required in the SFE. Second, since at atmospheric pressure carbon dioxide is a gas, the target compounds that are successfully extracted from the sample must be trapped so that they aren't lost with the waste carbon dioxide as it returns to atmospheric pressure. Finally, to obtain acceptable extraction efficiencies using SFE, recent laboratory studies have shown that a modifier solvent must be added to the super- critical fluid. Each of the manufacturers evaluated solves these problems differently. Hewlett Packard utilizes a variable-orifice flow restrictor, while Suprex and Dionex use a fixed-orifice flow restrictor. A variable-orifice flow restrictor is subject to mechanical failure and will cause added maintenance and down-time on the instrument. Hewlett Packard and Suprex utilize solid phase trapping on glass beads or adsorbent material for trapping while Dionex utilizes a liquid trapping device. Solid phase trapping is less desirable because it has very poor recovery for several of the target compounds. Also, solid phase trapping requires that larger volumes of solvent be used to elute the target compounds from the adsorbent. Suprex utilizes a modifier pump that adds the co-solvent as a percentage of the super-critical fluid; Hewlett Packard does not use a modifier pump; and Dionex adds the co-solvent on a molar basis by calculating the density of the super critical fluid and adding the modifier solvent on a density basis. Adding the co-solvent on a density basis results in a consistent ratio of the primary solvent to the co-solvent which results in significantly better extraction efficiencies and reproducibility. The Dionex 723 SFE system has a combination of solutions to the above problems that are superior to the other manufacturers. Therefore, the Dionex 723 SFE system is recommended for the following patented and proprietary reasons: 11 The Dionex 723 SFE system utilizes a patented fixed-orifice restrictor that is heated. The fixed-orifice restrictor is superior because it has no moving parts and is not subject to mechanical failure like the Hewlett Packard variable-orifice restrictor system. -3- June 9, 1993 The Dionex restrictor will result in less maintenance and down-time for the system. 2) The Dionex 723 SFE system utilizes a patent-pending liquid phase trapping system. This type of trapping system is superior to the others because solid phase trapping cannot handle the use of more than a 1-2% mixture of the co-modifier and primary solvents because the co-modifier solvent will wash the compounds of interest off the trap and they will be lost to waste resulting in unacceptable recoveries. Laboratory tests have shown that co- modifier solvents are most effective when they are introduced at more than a 5% mixture with the primary solvent. The Dionex liquid trap can adequately handle the wide range of co-solvent mixtures that we anticipate. 3) The dionex 723 SFE system utilizes a modifier pump that adds the co-solvent based on the density of the primary solvent. As pressure and temperature are varied in the SFE system, the density of the primary solvent changes. If the co-solvent is added on a volume basis, as the temperature or pressure is varied the actual ratio of co- solvent to primary solvent will vary also. This variation in co-solvent concentration will result in highly variable extraction efficiencies which are unacceptable. 4) The Dionex 723 SFE system is the only system that can extract eight samples at one time. The Hewlett Packard and the Suprex systems can only extract one sample at a time. This will significantly add to our productivity rate and will reduce turnaround time for the results that are reported to the Source Control and Operations Divisions. Based on labor savings of approximately 0.75 hour per sample times 500 samples per year at a rate of $40 per hour. SFE will save the Districts $15,000 per year. The Dionex 723 SFE system costs $40,150.00, yielding a payback period of 2.7 years. Staff therefore recommends the Purchase of Super-Critical Fluid Extractor System (Specification No. E-233) from Dionex Corporation for the total price of $40,150.00 plus sales tax and freight. -4- June 9, 1993 9(c): PURCHASE OF ONE SEGMENTED FLOW ANALYZER UPGRADE �..i (SPECIFICATION NO. E-2341. The Laboratory Division is responsible for analyzing for ammonia, cyanide, TKN, alkalinity, and volatile acids to support the Operations Division in complying with the Districts' NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit conditions. These analyses can be conducted either manually or automatically. The manual method involves the chemist pretreating the sample, if required, distilling the samples, adding reagents, titrating the resultant samples, and calculating the results. The segmented flow analysis method automatically measures out the sample, pretreats it, if required, mixes it with reagents, controls instrument parameters, detects the analyte, and calculates, reports and archives the results. Utilization of the automated segmented flow technique has resulted in increased productivity, accuracy and precision, and provides routine detection limits that are one to two orders of magnitude below those achieved with manual methods of analysis. Additionally, the segmented flow analyzer we employ is compatible with the new Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). The Districts' Laboratory currently owns a Skalar, Inc. segmented flow analyzer which is equipped to analyze cyanide for industrial discharge samples; cyanide and TKN in wastewater samples; and ammonia in wastewater, industrial, and ocean water samples. However, the current instrumentation is configured with a minimal number of modules and consequently cannot analyze more than one �..i constituent at the same time. As a result, the Laboratory bottlenecks on the existing instrumentation, must work overtime to run samples, and must resort to analyzing volatile acids and alkalinity with the more time-consuming and less- accurate manual methods of analyses. Staff is therefore proposing the acquisition of hardware which will expand the capabilities of the current system by enabling it to operate unattended after normal working hours, perform up to three separate analyses simultaneously, and perform volatile acids and alkalinity analyses using segmented flow analysis technology. The payback period for this instrumentation is approximately one year, calculated as follows: u -5- June 9, 1993 Cost Savings Analysis (All figures are based on a one-year period) OLD METHOD NEW METHOD No. of Cost Task Analyses Time, Labor Final Time, Labor Final Savings Hrs. I Rate* Costs Hrs. Rate* Costs Sludge Volatile Acids Samples 2,370 0.5 $40 $47,400 0.1 $40 $9,480 $37,920 Sludge Alkalinity Samples 1,500 0.5 $40 1 $30,000 o.i 1 $40 1 $6,000 $24,000 Annual Cost Savings $61,920 Payback Period 1 Year Staff therefore recommends the Purchase of One Segmented Flow Analyzer Upgrade (Specification No. E-234) consisting of one each computer- controlled autosampler, sampler, computer rinsing valves, chemistry unit, cartridge for the analysis of ammonia, flowcell with debubbler, 670 nm filter, 520 nm correction filter, two matrix photo detectors, three 2nd channel matrix inserts, and one analyzer control option, from Skalar, Inc., In the amount of $60,779 plus tax and shipping. 9(d): PURCHASE OF UPGRADE FOR LABORATORY VAX 4000. MODEL 300 COMPUTER SYSTEM (SPECIFICATION NO. E-2351. The Laboratory purchased a Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) In July 1991 . The LIMS provides a means to automate laboratory sample management, data handling, and report generation procedures. The automation provides a more productive and efficient system to track samples within the Laboratory and manage high volumes of data. The system's audit trail and security applications ensure that the integrity of the data is maintained. The Laboratory's utilization of the LIMS is expanding. This expansion is a result of added analytical instrumentation that was brought on line after the purchase of the LIMS and the utilization of the LIMS automated sample management and data handling protocols for the water quality data since July 1992. These measures have also provided increased data handling efficiency. Additionally, in May 1993 the Laboratory migrated the majority of its office -6- June 9, 1993 automation software and associated data files from the network fileserver it shared `i with several other divisions to the LIMS fileserver. This step was taken to provide additional disk space to the other divisions on the network and to house the Laboratory data in one location. Because of the increase in the utilization of the system, it is necessary to augment the system's disk drive configuration. The reconfiguration of the disk drives will ensure that the system will not fail due to filling the disk drives to their capacity. The system contains a series of disk drives configured in pairs. Each of these "shadowed disk drive sets" provides enhanced data security and system performance. Data security is enhanced by saving the information to both of the disk drives in the shadowed set each time data is saved to permanent storage on the VAX computer system. Should one of the drives fail, the data can still be accessed from the other disk in the set. This arrangement improves system performance by allowing the system to remain running during the time that one drive is inoperative. In addition, one of the disks can be isolated from the system to perform routine maintenance such as data backup. Analysis of the system configuration indicates that two of the current shadowing disk drive sets should be upgraded and an additional shadowing disk drive set be purchased. Purchase of these disk drives is critical to ensure that a sufficient amount of information can remain on line to generate the reports dictated by the various monitoring programs, to continue benefiting from the added �./ efficiency that automation of the Laboratory sample management and data handling practices provides, and to provide sufficient storage space for the large quantity of raw data that are generated by the Laboratory analytical instrumentation. After completion of the analysis, the data handling software of the instrument interprets this huge quantity of data to produce the reported result. Storage requirements for the sample and data management portion of the LIMS data base will increase as more of the Laboratory's activities migrate to the system. Staff anticipates that the proposed configuration would provide sufficient storage space for the next two years. Currently, data from analytical instrumentation, non-instrumental data, sample management records, and office automation records share space on two sets of shadowing disk drives. The proposed purchase will upgrade the existing drives to twice their current capacity and add one new set of shadowing drives to the configuration. Staff therefore recommends authorization to issue a purchase order to Digital Equipment Corporation for Purchase of Upgrade for Laboratory VAX Computer System (Specification No. E-235) in the net amount of $34,584.40, plus sales tax and delivery, to upgrade the existing disk drive configuration on the VAX -7- June 9, 1993 4000, Model 300 computer system by trading in four of the one gigabyte disk drives (two shadow sets) and purchasing six two gigabyte disk drives (three shadow sets). (Digital Equipment Corporation is the only manufacturer of this type of hard drive. Emulex Corporation discontinued their line late last year.) 9(a): PURCHASE OF HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY SYSTEM (SPECIFICATION N0. E-236). The Laboratory is responsible for performing analyses of wastewater, industrial source control samples, and ocean monitoring and sludge samples in support of the various activities of the Districts. All of these samples are analyzed for semi-volatile compounds (DDTs, PCBs, Phthalates and PAHs) and require processing before they can actually be Injected into the gas chromatographs. These types of environmental samples are extremely complex and the sample extracts contain significant amounts of lipids, fatty acids and other compounds that can cause interferences during analysis. A "clean-up" procedure is required to remove these Interferences so that analytical results meet today's requirements in terms of detection limits and quality acceptance criteria. Presently, the clean-up procedure used by the Laboratory requires very labor-Intensive column chromatography which is fraught with problems. Some of these problems include: 1) variation in the activity of the adsorbents resulting in large variations in the recovery of target compounds; 2) long processing times resulting in long turnaround times for data reporting; and 3) poorly cleaned extracts that increase the detection limit. Recent advances in high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) systems and the columns used for size exclusion chromatography (SEC) make it possible to automate the entire clean-up procedure. Prior to these advances, SEC columns were functional only using low pressure gravity-fed systems which operated at very slow flow rates, resulting in very long sample preparation times. Moreover, the high pressure columns are more stable which results in more reproducible separations. Using HPLC/SEC will not only save labor costs but will provide more consistent conditions during sample processing, resulting in better quality data. The Laboratory has evaluated three systems that are available for the purpose of sample clean-up; Waters Powerline HPLC System, ABC Laboratories Gel Permeation System, and the Zymark Gel Permeation System. The ABC Laboratories and Zymark gel permeation systems are not recommended because these are low pressure systems that have been adapted for use as high pressure units and their high pressure pumps are not proven to be adequate for this type of application. The pump system is one of the main components in an HPLC system -8- June 9, 1993 and the Waters Powerline System has had many years of development time and has been proven to be more than adequate for this application while the ABC and Zymark systems are new on the market and do not have a proven track record. The Waters Powerline System is recommended because of the following patented and proprietary qualifications: 1. The Waters Powerline System is equipped with a patented circular valve on its universal injector. This circular valve provides a unique fluid path which integrates the sample syringe into the sample flow path instead of using a defined length of tubing as a sample loop and externally injecting the sample into the loop. The sample syringe is then rinsed internally as part of the flow path as well as external to the flow path to reduce cross-contamination between samples. Also, this design utilizes a microprocessor-controlled syringe which can be precisely programmed for sample volumes which can be varied from 1 uL to 2 mL without changing "sample loops" because there is no sample loop. Changing sample loops causes down time on the instrument. The ability to use variable Injection volumes eliminates the need to dilute samples before processing which is a potential source of error and contamination of the sample. 2. This system is equipped with a patented dual-piston pump with a variable flow rate between 10 uL/min. and 20 uL/min. The dual-piston pump eliminates cavitation of the solvent which causes air bubbles and results in noise in the detector signal caused by single-piston pumps at high pressure. The ABC and Zymark systems use single- piston pumps. 3. The chromatography column provided with the Waters system is a patented Ultrastyrogel size exclusion column. Size exclusion columns separate the compounds of interest from their interferences based on molecular weight. The quality of the column is critical for determining the purity of the separation. The Waters column provides better resolution and higher sample loading than other columns. In addition, Waters is the only manufacturer that makes its own post-column derivatization system. A derivatization system is important for processing certain compounds that cannot be directly injected onto the GC. Automated post-column derivatization is considerably faster and significantly reduces variability. -9- June 9, 1993 4. The Waters Absorbance Detector contains a patented Taper-Cell flow cell design which has the best signal-to-noise ratio and compensates for refractive index effects which cause excessive noise in the detector signal. This cell provides improved linearity which reduces the number of calibration runs needed and ensures high sensitivity. Also, the lamp is software controlled and can be set to "stand-by" mode which increases the life of the lamp because the lamp does not need to be kept turned on between runs. 5. The Waters system comes equipped with a fully programmable fraction collector that can accommodate any type of collection system necessary. As the samples flow from the chromatography column, only certain fractions are collected for analysis and the volumes of these fractions can vary depending on sample matrix. For example, wastewater will require different volumes than the industrial source control samples which are quite variable in and of themselves. Because of this variation, a flexible collection system is required so that different sizes and numbers of collection vials can be used. 6. The Waters HPLC software is Windows-based which is compatible with the software platform used throughout the Laboratory. The Waters HPLC system will save approximately one hour per sample in processing time. A technician's salary plus overhead is $40.00 per hour and can be expected to process 1000 samples per year, resulting in a cost payback of $40,000 per year, or 1.8 years. Staff therefore recommends the Purchase of High Pressure Liquid Chromatograph System (Specification No. E-2361 from the Waters Chromatography Division of Millipore Corporation, in the amount of $73,363.70 plus tax and freight. 91f1: APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 1. AND AWARD CONTRACT FOR OFFICE TRAILER RELOCATIONS AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2. SPECIFICATION NO. M-044. For many years the Districts have utilized office trailers for temporary quarters until permanent office space could be built; or for activities that are considered somewhat transient in nature, such as the construction management offices as we periodically relocate our construction management offices to an area that is close to the major upcoming construction work. -10- June 9, 1993 This project is the relocation of thirteen existing office trailers located at both treatment plants to new uses. Several of the trailers are located adjacent to the old laboratory at Plant No. 1 and are proposed to be relocated to new uses at both Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2. Also at Plant No. 1 source control inspectors are moving into recently completed facilities in our shop complex, and two trailers previously used by that group located in the south central portion of the plant are proposed to be relocated to Plant No. 2. Finally, our construction trailers at Plant No. 2 are proposed to be relocated to other uses to clear the way for the construction of our new Plant No. 2 Maintenance Building and Warehouse. At Plant No. 2 about half of the trailers will be used for an upgraded Construction Management office. The existing Plant No. 2 Construction Management office is housed in trailers, most of which are sixteen years old and in need of repair. The Master Plan of Support Facilites recommended a permanent Construction Management office building as part of the Districts' support facilities at Plant No. 2, at an estimated cost of $1,500,000. The utilization of the surplus trailers instead of permanent structures results in a net savings of approximately $1,300,000. About half of the surplus trailers will be used for this purpose thus eliminating the expense of a permanent building. Three trailers will be used for storage. Other uses include additional space for Operations and Management Information Services at Plant No. 1. The project also includes paving, decking and utility construction. The Directors, acting on a Building Committee recommendation, approved plans and specifications for this project at the April 14, 1993 Board meeting. (1) Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 1 provides for minor modifications and clarifications to the plans and specifications. (2) Addendum No. 2 Addendum No. 2 changed the time required for project completion to 90 days and made other minor technical clarifications. _11_ June 9, 1993 (3) Award of Contract On May 11, 1993, five bids were received for the Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. The bids ranged from a high of $405o497 to a low of $199,200. The low bidder was Park Rose Construction, Inc. of Long Beach, CA. Staff recommends awarding the job to Park Rose Construction, Inc. for their low bid amount of $199,200. The engineer's estimate was $150,000.00. 9(g): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO, 22 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1. Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, designed by Brown and Caldwell Engineers, is part of the $70 million master- planned Central Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at both plants. This $16.8 million contract includes installation of three prepurchased digester-gas burning, spark-ignited, 3,472 horsepower engines with generators that are each capable of producing 2,500 kilowatts of electrical power. Change Order No. 22 adds $8,251.00 to the contract for two Items of additional work. Item 1, in an amount of $7,389.00, is for relocating sample ports required for emissions testing of the engines. The sample ports were originally located in the contract drawings based on requirements and information provided by South Coast Air Quality Management Districts (SCAQMD) during the project's design, several years ago. Now, the ports had to be relocated to comply with current SCAQMD requirements. Item 2, in the amount of $862.00, is for providing a chain link fence partition In the Elevator Mechanical Room to prevent unauthorized access through the room, and to also separate elevator equipment in the room from other nonelevator devices as required by State of California Elevator Safety Orders. Item 1 involves rework required to comply with current South Coast Air Quality Management District's standards. Item 2 would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $1,455,705.00, with 335 calendar days time extension. This represents an increase of 9.45% over the original contract amount. Of this amount, 2.77% represents the cost of correcting deficiencies in the gas-driven engines and related equipment which were improperly manufactured and prepared for storage by the engine manufacturer which has been previously reported to the Directors. -12- June 9, 1993 Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 22 for an addition of �..i $8,251 .00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(h): AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR FINAL EFFLUENT SAMPLER SYSTEM AND BIOASSAY RESEARCH FACILITY AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. J-32. The existing effluent sampler system is old, worn and needs to be replaced to insure consistent and reliable test results. These tests are the basis for determining compliance with requirements of the Districts' NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit, issued by the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The existing bioassay research facility is in the basement of the old Control Center at Plant No. 1 . While this facility has been useful, it has no means for temperature control, communications, or controlled access during sensitive testing. Much of the bioassay research work centers around the quality of the Districts' effluent and it, therefore, makes sense to locate the facility near the outfall and sampling stations at Plant No. 2. This is particularly important because emerging water quality requirements significantly increase the bioassay work that must be done. The proposed improvements include relocating and remodeling two existing trailers, including new foundations, electrical equipment and utilities, and the installation of samplers. On May 18, 1993, four bids were received for the construction/installation of the Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-32. The bids ranged from a high of $275,000.00, to a low of $202,579.00 submitted by Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material. Staff recommends award to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for their low bid amount of $202,579.00. The engineer's estimate for the work was $210,000. 90): AWARD OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1 . JOB NO, P1-42 AND MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-49. Eight projects are combined in Job No. P1-42, Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1, and five projects are combined in Job No. P2-49, Miscellaneous Projects at Plant No. 2. These projects include items such as pump -13- June 9, 1993 drive shaft replacement, sidewalk installation, compressor drain modifications, stairway relocation and stiffening and seismic pipe bracing projects which are design improvements to primary clarifiers and generally reflect new design requirements which were not in the original design contracts. Other projects, such as replacement of stair treads, an access platform, influent channel isolation valve and minor electrical improvements are uncomplicated designs with a high priority. To expedite this project, staff has prepared the plans and specifications, completed a formal advertisement, received bids. On May 18, 1993, three bids were received for said job. The bids ranged from a high of $350,000.00, to a low of $235,900.00, submitted by Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material. Staff recommends award to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for their low bid amount of $235,900.00. The engineer's estimate was $260,000.00. 9(j): CONSIDERATION OF ADDENDUM NO. 9 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN & CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS, JOB NO. J-19. The design engineering contract for Job No. J-19, the Central Power Generation Systems projects, was first awarded to Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers in July 1986. The original contract provided support for preliminary project development and securing a Permit to Construct from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Once the permit was obtained, the final design work was added to the contract. The Central Power Generation Systems, now under construction at both Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2, will utilize the Districts' digester gas, a byproduct of the sewage treatment process, to fuel internal combustion engines which in turn will drive generators and produce power to operate the treatment plants. When completed, the Districts will be self- sufficient for power. Facilities contracts have been awarded for the $21 million manufacture and procurement of the eight large internal combustion engine-generating sets, the award of a $21 million installation contract at the Huntington Beach Treatment Plant, and a $17 million installation contract at the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. With design, permitting, emission reduction credits acquired and contract administration and inspection charges, the project will cost approximately $70 million when complete. Problems associated with engine damage at Plant No. 2 and with obtaining Cooper/Energy Services installation certificates at both plants have resulted in delays in completion of the projects. Addendum No. 8 to the Brown -14- June 9, 1993 and Caldwell design agreement provided for additional construction support services and presumed that the need for these services would end at the originally anticipated completion date in January 1993 but since the completion has been delayed additional construction support services are required. However, savings from the load shedding design and the automatic var-power factor control systems in the original scope of work have resulted in available funds in the engineering services category, and the designer has requested that the funds be reallocated for Construction Support Services. In addition, Brown and Caldwell is requesting an adjustment between the Professional Services and Expenses categories to align original contract budget estimates with actual expenses incurred, as follows, with no change in the total authorized fee: Proposed Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addn. No. 9 Agreement Professional Services, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 175%), not to exceed $3,488,820 $(36,503) $3,452,327 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 418,777 36,503 455,280 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 162,700 0 162,700 Fixed Profit 400,839 0 400,839 Total Contract, not to exceed S4.471 .136 S4.471 .136 The Selection Committee recommends approval of Addendum No. 9 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers in connection with Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for reallocation of funds between categories with no change in the total authorized amount. Copies of the Selection Committee certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. -15- June 9, 1993 91k): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1 . JOB NO. 121-36. AND SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO, P2-42. In October 1989, the Directors awarded a professional services agreement for preparation of plans and specifications for design and construction support services to expand the secondary treatment facilities' capacity from 46 million gallons per day (MGD) to 80 MGD at Plant No. 1, and from 75 MGD to 90 MGD at Plant No. 2. This design and construction effort includes extensive structural and mechanical modifications to existing facilities for expansion of the secondary treatment capacity and provides for various miscellaneous support facilities. Job No. P1-36, the secondary treatment expansion at Plant No. 1, is under design with completion scheduled this year. Job No. P2.42, the secondary expansion at Plant No. 2, is divided into two contracts; Job No. P2-42-1 is the electrification of pump drives at Plant No. 2 and P2-42-2 is the secondary treatment expansion. Both are under construction. As the design for the Plant No. 1 secondary treatment expansion has progressed, several modifications and changes have been identified that staff believes will enhance the treatment process, provide operational flexibility, increase reliability and improve our ability to continue to meet our NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit requirements imposed by the U.S. EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. These include: a) modifications to the existing air diffusion headers; b) provide an automatic influent control system; c) increase return activated sludge flow rates; and d) provide pumping flexibility in the plant effluent pump station. The major change is the proposed modification of the air diffusion headers. During the activated sludge secondary treatment process, air is introduced Into the wastewater in huge aeration basins to stimulate the biological removal of pollutants. There are several types of devices that can be used to help attain broad diffusion of the air with the wastewater. During the preliminary design of the system expansion at Plant No. 1, it was proposed to use the same type of air diffusers that are currently utilized In the Plant No. 1 secondary treatment facility. The existing system, which has worked very well, uses a round membrane tube, or "sock" design, to diffuse the air. Because the air diffusion is so critical to effectiveness and efficiency of the secondary treatment process, the Operations and Engineering staffs are recommending that the consultant investigate and test a new flat plate design to -16- June 9, 1993 determine if an alternative to the existing system could result in substantial savings in future energy demand and more effective treatment removal rates. (This is not an issue at Plant No. 2 because that plant uses pure oxygen in its secondary treatment system rather than air.) The proposed new work would Include a detailed study of the performance of the new plate design at other facilities and a report on the energy savings that could be expected. Since there are no two treatment plants with identical sewage characteristics or operating modes, a pilot study is also advisable. The engineer would also provide support for a pilot project to test the plate diffusers. If the tests determine that a new device is appropriate, it would be designed into the existing basins when the final P1-36 project is let for bidding, in about one year. The Selection Committee has negotiated for the additional work, as follows: Proposed Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addn, No. 2 Agreement Direct Labor, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 155%), not to exceed $4,474,262 $ 0 $4,474,262 Direct Labor, (hourly rates including labor plus overhead at 166%), not to exceed 292,000 292,000 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 180,000 0 180,000 Fixed Profit 523,811 11 ,680 535,491 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed S5.178.073 S303.680 S5.481 .753 The Selection Committee recommends approval of Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, increasing the maximum total fee from -17- June 9, 1993 an amount not to exceed $5,178,073 to an amount not to exceed $5,481,753. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. 9(l): APPROVE AGREEMENTS FOR PURCHASE OF NATURAL GAS FROM THE GAS COMPANY. The Directors are aware that the Central Power Generation projects at both treatment plants are in start up. When in operation, the eight engines, five at Treatment Plant No. 2, and three at Reclamation Plant No. 1, will use substantial amounts of natural gas which diminishes as the production of digester gas increases over the years. Natural gas will always be used as pilot fuel for the ignition of the digester gas and, in the initial years, as a supplement to digester gas. Because of the volumes of natural gas to be used it is necessary to enter into new agreements with The Gas Company. Under the proposed agreements the Districts will purchase natural gas through August 1, 1995 from The Gas Company. The agreement, beginning August 1, 1993 is based on estimates, and actual use experience will allow the development of firm volumes for future purchase agreements. Because these projects are true co-generation projects, i.e., both heat and produced-power are utilized, they enjoy a co-generation rate which should average less than $0.35 a therm throughout the year. Actual rates will be based on peak use, which is not yet known. Once a firm usage base is established, it may be possible for the Districts In future years to purchase the supplemental natural gas through a bidding process. The Gas Company would provide the pipeline network necessary for delivery, while purchase contracts might be obtained directly from suppliers. This procedure is not recommended at this time because of the uncertainty of volumes. Separately, interim agreements to purchase gas at the low co-generation rates were executed effective January 1,1993; these agreements would replace the current agreements beginning August 1, 1993. The recommended action is to authorize the General Manager to execute master service contracts with The Gas Company to purchase the necessary gas for co-generation systems at both treatment plants, for the period January 1, 1993 through August 1, 1995, The contracts have been approved as to form by General Counsel. The estimated annual amount is $1,800,000. -18- June 9, 1993 9(m): APPROVING FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT FOR �..i UTILIZATION OF RECLAIMED WASTEWATER WITH ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT. Pursuant to a 1972 agreement, the Districts have been providing the Orange County Water District (OCWD) with treated secondary effluent at no cost for use in OCWD's water recycling program. The Districts' 1989 Master Plan identified the demand for recycled water for operational needs at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 to meet a portion of our treatment plant operating water use requirements. The most cost-effective manner to meet the Districts' recycled water needs is to use Green Acres Project (GAP) water available from the OCWD. Use of recycled (tertiary) water for certain treatment plant processes is less costly than potable water, will replace treatment plant (secondary) water, will ensure maximum safety for the Districts' employees, and will help conserve water resources. The Districts' Master Plan assumed that recycled GAP water would be supplied by the OCWD at minimal cost and the Districts would in turn supply the OCWD with secondary effluent for recycling purposes. In December 1991, the Districts began receiving approximately 1.4 million gallons per day (mgd) of GAP water from the OCWD. The Districts' recycled water needs are expected to increase with expansion of Plant No. 1 and delivery of recycled water to Plant No. 2. The Districts have been receiving GAP water pending negotiations with the OCWD (previously authorized by the Directors) to define the terms and conditions of its acquisition. For the reasons stated above, the 1972 agreement between the Districts and the OCWD needs updating. The staff from both Districts have negotiated an agreement on the price of GAP water in accordance with the conditions previously approved by the Boards. It provides for the Districts to supply up to 50 mgd of secondary treated effluent to OCWD at no cost. It also includes language that acknowledges the changing nature of water pricing and provides for future modifications to the agreement to reflect such changes and the change in cost and policy of providing secondary treated effluent to the OCWD, as appropriate. Under the agreement the Districts would only pay the audited 0&M costs for the amount of GAP water used by the Districts. Current 0&M costs are approximately $460.50 per million gallons ($150 per acre foot). Based upon the current OCWD price proposal, the present worth cost for GAP water was estimated at 54.7 million in comparison to $7.6 million for separate Districts' on-site facilities. -19- June 9, 1993 The terms of the contract negotiated with the OCWD for long-term supply of GAP water also includes a provision that the Districts would pay the audited 0&M costs, or the lower price paid for GAP water by any other GAP customer, whichever is less. Should the OCWD be unable to provide the Districts with GAP water due to increased community demand for recycled water, then the OCWD will give the Districts 24 months in which to complete on-site water recycling facilities. The action appearing on the agenda is to approve the agreement and authorize its execution by the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1 on behalf of itself and the other Districts. 9(n): GENERAL AUTHORIZATION FOR ATTENDANCE OF PERSONNEL AND DIRECTORS AT TRAINING PROGRAMS, LEGISLATIVE, REGULATORY AND OTHER MEETINGS AND FUNCTIONS IN 1993-94. On an annual basis the General Manager is routinely authorized to designate members of the Board and/or staff to attend training programs, legislative, regulatory and other meetings and functions, conferences, etc., which he believes will be of value to the Districts. Such attendance is in accordance with existing Districts' travel and expense reimbursement policies (the maximum per diem for meals and incidentals is $401day) and the approved annual budget. It is recommended that this authorization be renewed for 1993-94. Included in the 1993-94 budget is the amount of $225,000 for training, meetings and travel, a reduction of 10% from 1992-93. The budget amount includes funds for staff training for treatment plant and electrical, mechanical, Instrumentation and other systems; wastewater treatment and laboratory work; computerized systems; supervisory and management training; attendance and participation in state and federal legislative and regulatory proceedings; participation in various wastewater management- related groups; Board committee meeting expenses, and other related expenses. DISTRICTS 1 AND 2 9(o): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO IMPROVEMENTS TO MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR, CONTRACT NO 2-30. This $3.5 million project within the cities of Orange and Santa Ana, includes the construction of a new 2.2-mile gravity sewer line and appurtenances in Memory Lane from the Santa Ana River to the Santa Ana Freeway, in Owens -20- June 9, 1993 Drive from the Santa Ana Freeway to Parker Street, in Parker Street from Owens u Drive to Le Vets Avenue and in La Veta Avenue from Parker Street to Batavia Street. Portions were constructed using boring techniques where excavations were prohibited such as crossing the Santa Ana Freeway. Funding was shared with the City of Santa Ana contributing $1,300,000.00, City of Orange at $700,000.00 and Districts 1 and 2 sharing the remaining $1,500,000.00. Change Order No. 2 adds $45,858.11 to the contract for three items. Item 1, in the amount of $19,979.16, is for additional work and delays caused by uncovering undisclosed underground utilities during excavation and pipe laying operations. This includes telephone, water and gas lines in Parker Street and La Veta Avenue, City of Orange. This item includes a 10-calendar day extension of time for delays. Item 2, in the amount of $25,878.95, is for repairs to the deteriorated roadway and portions of the curb and gutters of the two eastbound lanes of La Veta Avenue in the City of Orange, adjacent to the trench. This was a pre-existing condition caused by poor soil compaction under the roadway. The work was added to leave the job in a good condition, particularly since a major detour by Caltrans will soon be routed over this street. This is consistent with long-standing District policy to leave each work site better than it was prior to the construction. This item includes a 10- calendar day extension of time for delays associated with the repairs. Item 3, is a reduction of retainage from ten percent to five percent. As of this writing, the project is complete. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. There is no replacement work. If the Directors approve this change order, the total of the change orders to date on this contract will be $124,131.33 with 20 calendar days time extension. This represents an increase of 3.6% over the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for a net addition of $45,858.11 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. There is a 20 day time extension associated with this change order. -21- June 9, 1993 DISTRICT 7 9(p): APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RE ABANDONMENT OF NAVY WAY PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAIN, AND CONSTRUCTION OF REPLACEMENT GRAVITY SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-20. The Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation in July 1992, for the Abandonment of Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer,Contract No. 7-20. The plans and specifications are completed and the project is now ready for bidding. The Navy Way Pump Station, built in 1969, serves a 950-acre watershed located north of the U.S. Marine Corps Air Station in Tustin and generally east of Red Hill Avenue. Abandonment of this pump station was previously considered uneconomical because of the longer gravity sewer that would be needed, approximately 6200 feet of 24-inch pipe, costing about $1,300,000. However, the pump station's force main is a single barrel conduit made of Techite pipe, now determined to be an unreliable product. Further, the Boards adopted a policy several years ago of constructing new force mains with dual pipelines instead of single pipelines for reliability. The Navy Way Pump Station, built prior to this policy, has only a single force main, 2600 feet long, made of 16-inch Techite pipe. This pipe is now 22 years old, and because of the poor history with Techite pipe experienced by the Districts as well as with other agencies operating such pipe, it was decided to abandon the pump station and force main and construct the gravity sewer in lieu of constructing a new force main. The alignment of the gravity sewer would be from the existing Navy Way Pump Station located in Edinger Avenue at the projection of Browning Avenue, then southeasterly in the Edinger Avenue median to the Jamboree Plaza, then parallel to the Jamboree Plaza northerly boundary to the Irvine Ranch Water District's Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer (HATS). Wastewater flow from the Navy Way drainage area was included in a capacity purchase agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District's Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer to allow for the abandonment of this and nine other pump stations located on the easterly slope of the Tustin Hills. A no-cost easement was obtained from Clay Capital Incorporated for the portion of the gravity sewer located along the northerly boundary of the Jamboree Plaza now under construction. The design of this project has been accelerated to reduce the number of improvements in Jamboree Plaza that CSD 7 would have to replace and to allow the best use of a temporary Construction Easement which expires in November 1993. -22- June 9, 1993 Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Contract No. 7-20. The bid date is tentatively set for July 13, 1993. The engineer's estimate for the project is $1 .3 million. 9(q): AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT RE PARALLEL AND REPLACEMENT OF PORTIONS OF LEMON HEIGHTS SUBTRUNK, LA COLINA DRIVE TO NEWPORT BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO, 7-22. The Lemon Heights Trunk Sewer, Contract Nos. 7-3 and 7-3A, were constructed circa 1962, serving the area generally bounded by Newport Boulevard, La Colina Drive and Skyline Drive. The Districts' 1989 Master Plan found much of the Lemon Heights Sewer system hydraulically deficient, requiring parallel or replacement sewers. This was very evident from surcharges in the system during in the 1992-93 rainy season, and has forced this work ahead of originally planned schedules. The 1989 Master Plan recommends the 8-inch and 10-inch sewer be relieved or replaced with 12-inch and 15-inch parallel and replacement sewers. Exact sizing and limits of new sewers would be determined in the design. Staff is proceeding with the project in two phases. First, as noted above, high infiltration of rainwater was experienced during the storm season. Smoke tests on portions of the system were performed which found yard drains illegally u connected to the sewer system. Further tests are being conducted over the entire drainage area to identify and eliminate illegal rainwater connections. In the second phase, studies and preparation of plans and specifications will be prepared to correct the sewer deficiencies. Staff is recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate a professional services agreement for the Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the agreement will be presented to the Directors for consideration. ALL DISTRICTS 11: NOMINATIONS FOR JOINT CHAIRMAN. As provided in the Joint Boards' Rules of Procedures, nominations for Joint Chairman are made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place at the July regular meeting. -23- June 9, 1993 Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chairman will be conducted at the July regular meeting. For new Director's information, we have included below an excerpt from the current Rules of Procedures for meetings relative to the election of the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. "8. Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. "A Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the regular meeting in July of each year. The nominations for Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in June each year, and the nominees may prepare a statement of not more than 100 words stating their qualifications for the office of Chairman. The statements shall be mailed to members of the Joint Boards of Directors with the agenda and other meeting material for the July regular meeting. "The nominations for Vice Joint Chairman shall be made at the regular Board meeting in July each year and shall be made immediately following the election of the Joint Chairman. "The Chairman and Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure of the majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Chairman becomes vacant due to resignation or retirement of the incumbent prior to the expiration of the regular term, the Vice Chairman shall automatically succeed to the office of the Chairman and shall continue to serve through the remainder of the regular term unless sooner removed by action of a majority of the Districts. In the event the office of Vice Chairman becomes vacant prior to the expiration of the regular term, nominations and the election of a Director to serve in that capacity shall be conducted at the next regular Board meeting. The person so elected shall serve the balance of the regularly scheduled term unless sooner removed as a result of action by a majority of the Districts." 12: FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31. 1993. Enclosed are the budgetary financial statements for the third quarter of the fiscal year. The Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget -24- June 9, 1993 statements were reviewed by the Fiscal Policy Committee on May 19, 1993. If �./ any Director has questions pertaining to the statements, please call Gary Streed, Director of Finance, at (714) 962-2411, extension 2500. 13: APPROVING AMENDMENT NO, 10 FOR YEAR 9 (1993-94) NPDES PERMIT OCEAN MONITORING AGREEMENT WITH SAIC, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-032. A condition of the Districts' NPDES modified 301(h) Ocean Discharge Permit allows the discharge of a high quality but less than full secondary-treated effluent. The permit, jointly issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) in 1985, provides that the Districts must conduct an extensive marine monitoring and research program designed to characterize the effects, if any, of our discharge of treated wastewater on the ocean environment to assure that the beneficial uses of the ocean are being protected. The five-year NPDES permit expired in February 1990. However, it has been administratively extended pending a decision by EPA on the application for renewal of the 301(h) permit authorized by the Boards in 1989. In the interim, the existing monitoring program is required to be continued. In 1985, the Districts issued a Request for Proposals to provide Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for the Districts' 120-inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032. After evaluation of seven respondents, the Districts entered into an agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) to provide these services for the five-year life of the permit. Between the initial contract and Year 8 (1992-93), the scope of the monitoring program has been increased significantly to comply with changing EPA requirements. The Year 9 program has been negotiated by staff for a price not to exceed $2,120,480.00. This price reflects a cost reimbursement contingency fund of $110,000.00 for chemistry analysis (which was not in the $1,639,938 Year 8 contract price) only in the event of an unforeseen need to secure a new analytical chemistry subcontracting laboratory. Other increases in the program costs are due to an Increase in chemistry analysis costs and to changes in the scope of work for Year 9. In preparation for negotiations on the Districts' 301 IN waiver application with EPA, several supplemental studies have been added to the Year 9 program to support and enhance the program elements and to advance our understanding of the Districts' discharge effects on the ocean environment. Enclosed with the supporting agenda documents is the report and recommendation of the Selection Committee along with a detailed staff analysis of -25- June 9, 1993 the SAIC proposal for Year 9 (1993-94) of the ocean monitoring program. The Selection Committee recommends approval of Amendment No. 10 to the agreement with SAIC, extending the ocean monitoring agreement for 1993-94 in the amount of $2,120,480.00. 14: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF FISCAL POLICY/EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on May 19, 1993 and again jointly with the Executive Committee on May 26, 1993. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on their deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 15: PAYMENT OF CLAIMS AFTER JUNE 30, 1993. The individual District's 1993-94 budgets will not be adopted until the July Joint Board Meeting and, therefore, it is necessary to have Board authorization for the payment of claims from July 1 to the date of adoption of next year's budgets. It is recommended that this routine action, taken annually, be approved as set forth on the agenda listing. 16: APPROVE ADDENDA NOS. 1 AND 2. AND AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR PROJECTS ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1 . JOB NO. P1-38-2. Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38 and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, include over 100 relatively small miscellaneous improvements to various facilities throughout both treatment plants. The proposed improvements will enhance safety, process reliability and performance, and replace or upgrade obsolete equipment and systems. These items have been split between five smaller projects categorized as higher priority projects at each plant, lower priority projects at each plant, and security and landscaping improvements at Plant No. 1. This project, Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2, is the second in the series of five construction projects. There are twenty-one items of work included in these construction documents. The following summarizes the larger items of work to be constructed: - Demolition of the old City Water Pump Station. - Prechlorination system modifications to convert system from manual control to flow paced control. -26- June 9, 1993 - Modifications to improve operations and safety at the Chlorine `j Building. - Chemical storage tank containment areas to prevent contamination. - Modifications to the primary treatment facilities to improve sludge density control, scum removal and pumping, and to provide safer access to the scum removal point at the circular basins. - Replacement of all sewage diversion gates at the Metering and Diversion Structure. - Construction of two new scrubbers to operate in series with Headworks scrubbers to treat peak loads of hydrogen sulfide from the influent trunks to reduce odors. - Replacement of the paging system at both plants. - Automatic transfer switch at the plant water pumps. Piping modifications at grit chambers to alleviate plugging problems. Staff has accelerated the bidding process to take advantage of the excellent bidding climate. The Directors approved the plans and specifications in May 1993. (1) Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for this project, added a construction item to include design work prepared by Lee and Ro Consulting Engineers, to modify the Primary Influent Splitter Box at Clarifiers 6-15 to eliminate scum buildup in the splitter box, and provide clarification of miscellaneous technical information required for the bidding process. 12) Addendum No. 2 Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for this project, provides clarification to the temporary pumping specification required during the replacement of the gates at the Metering and Diversion Structure, and other miscellaneous technical information required for the bidding process. (3) Award of Job No. P1-38-2 On May 18, 1993, six bids were received for the subject construction project. The bids ranged from a high of $4,934,350.00, to a low of $3,364,600.00, submitted by Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the agenda. -27- June 9, 1993 Staff recommends award to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for their low bid amount of $3,364,600.00. The engineer's estimate for the work was $5,000,000.00. 17: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. J ay a Nester e ay agar JWS:jt _28_ RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 T COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ^� May 19, 1993 0ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA tOBAA ELLIS AVExVE VO.BOx B127 / MUMAIN VALLEY.O LIFORNIL 82729A127 'V n141962.241i Joint Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 & 14 of Orange County, California Subject: Summary Financial Report for Nine Months Ended March 31 , 1993 Transmitted herewith is the Summary Financial Report for nine months ended March 31, 1993. The statements summarize the fiscal activities of the joint operations and the individual Districts through the third quarter of the 1992-93 fiscal year and the status of each with respect to the approved budgets. The combined 1992-93 budget for all Districts is $538.4 million, of which approximately 41 % is for capital expenditures for facilities improvements and additions, including reserves for said capital projects and borrowing. The total budgeted revenue and expense categories of the several Districts are set forth below. TABLET COMPARATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY (MILLIONS OF DOLLARSI Inaeesa 1992.93 REQUIREMENTS 1991-92• 1992-93A IDecessel % of Badaa JOINT TREATMENT WORKS 0. M& R 8 60.0 8 48.6 8 (1.4) 9.0% COLLECTION SYSTEM &OTHER DISTRICT 0, M & R 11.4 11.3 1.1) 2.1% TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 114.1 80.6 133.6) 16.0% DISTRICT SEWER CONSTRUCTION APPROPRIATIONS 30.1 29.4 (.7) 5.5% DEBT ISSUE& SERVICE (G.O. & C.O.P.) 35.6 39.0 3.6 7.2% SUB-TOTAL $241.1 $208.9 4 (32.2) 38.8% CONSTRUCTION RESERVES $224.8 $110.1 $1114.71 20.6% OTHER RESERVES 128.E 219.2 92.7 40.7% SUB-TOTAL F361.3 $329.3 5�220) 61.2% TOTAL REQUIREMENTS 8 UA 8638.2 $ 164,21 100.0 FUNDING CARRY-OVER B 90.2 B 85.4 1 5.2 17.7% APPROPRIATED RESERVES 264.E 208.8 145.71 �.8 SUB-TOTAL 344.7 $304.2 $ (40.51 56.5% TAX ALLOCATION 0% SHARE) $ 36.1 $ 34.2 $ (.9) 6.4% TAX LEVY FOR BOND REDEMPTION -- - - - - -- - --- CONSTRUCTION GRANTS --- FEES 81.3 77.6 (3.81 14.4% BORROWING 91.1 98.6 7.4 18.3% INTEREST&OTHER 39.2 23.8 (16.4) 4.4% SUB-TOTAL $247.7 6234.0 B (13.7) 43.6% TOTAL FUNDING 4§2M 4698.2 8 164.21 100.0 'ADJUSTED FOR INTER-DISTRICT TRANSACTIONS Summary Financial Report Page 2 r May 19, 1993 Included in each District's statement is a summary of the above major income and expense categories and an itemization of their trunk sewer construction projects and respective share of the joint works expansion. Authorized general reserves and inter- fund transfers have been excluded from the budget column on said statements as expenditures are not charged directly against such appropriations. Summarized below are comments relative to the financial statements. The statements are presented on an accrual basis and, therefore, inter-district cash transactions for fiscal 1992-93 which were accrued in 1991-92 are not reflected in the year-to-date balances. CASH AND INVESTMENTS Earned interest generated by our continuing program of investing reserve funds (primarily capital funds accumulated for construction of required sewerage facilities) is $20.9 million through the third quarter of the year. Virtually 100% of our funds are invested in short-term government securities or time deposits. As of March 31 , 1993, 92% of our funds were invested with the County Treasurer's commingled investment program. The remaining 8% of funds, representing the debt service reserves for the 1990-92 Series B and C COP issues and the unspent proceeds of the 1990-92 Series B and C issues, is held and invested by the trustees for each issue. JOINT OPERATING FUND This fund accounts for operations, maintenance, and administrative activities relative to the Districts' jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities. The JO expenditures along with the self-funded insurance program costs are monitored by the Fiscal Policy Committee and if some unexpected expenditures are experienced, they are reviewed by the Committee. Salaries and Wages - Even though we have had to add employees, there are several authorized but unfilled positions and, thus, some minor payroll savings have been realized to date. Employees' Benefits - Includes Retirement, Workers' Compensation, Unemployment Insurance, Group Medical Insurance and Uniforms. Charoebacks to Districts and CORF - Payroll expenses are charged back to CORF through the cost accounting system for work on the treatment plants' capital expansion program, and to individual Districts for work on Districts' collection facilities capital expansion projects as well as maintenance and repair of said systems. Source Control Division charges to respective Districts are also included in these chargebacks. Gasoline. Oil & Fuel - Includes all fuel for motor pool. A large portion is recovered through our equipment billing system and included in revenue below. _ Summary Financial Report v Page 3 May 19, 1993 �J Insurance - Budget amount includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee fidelity, boiler, fire, earthquake and all risk insurance policies, and pro-rata cost of the self-funded liability insurance program. Expense is in line with annual budget. Memberships - Includes the cost of membership in CASA, AMSA, SARFPA, SCAP, WateReuse and other organizations. Annual membership costs are recorded when paid. Office Expense - This account includes various types of office supplies, postage, stationery and related items. Chlorine and Odor Control Chemicals - Primarily for influent and sludge odor control at treatment plant sites. The main chemicals used to control odors are chlorine and ferrous chloride. Ferric chloride is used as a supplemental odor control chemical, and caustic soda is also used in air scrubbers throughout the plants to reduce hydrogen sulfide emissions. New air scrubbers are proving to be less costly to operate than anticipated. Chemical Coagulants - Expenditures for this item are required to dewater our sludges prior to disposal to comply with Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as solvents, cleaners, janitorial, tools, lab chemicals, etc., purchased throughout the year. Contractual Services - The major elements in this line item are payment for grit removal and disposal at the BKK landfill and payment for removal and off-site beneficial reuse of sludge. Professional Services - Primarily consists of General Counsel's fees, other legal services, audit fees, and miscellaneous consulting services. Printino and Publications - Includes all reproduction activities in-house and with outside services. Rents and Leases - Equipment Outside Equipment Rental - Primarily for the rental of large cranes and equipment necessary for removing and replacing major pumps, engines and other large equipment during the course of maintenance and repair operations. CSDOC Equipment Rental - Reflects the charges for District-owned equipment used for overhead type activities. There is an offsetting credit applied through the cost allocation system for these charges. Summary Financial Report Page 4 May 19, 1993 Repairs and Maintenance - This item includes parts and supplies for repair of plant facilities. Escalating costs continue to have a significant impact on this item. Generally, this account runs close to budget each year due to the unpredictability of major equipment failures. Research and Monitoring - Budget includes funds for the ocean monitoring contract required by our NPDES permit. Other projects include operational research and evaluation of processes to develop optimum operating parameters, and also include the Districts' annual share of participation in the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. Travel. Meetings & Training - Major items are authorized by specific Board actions. Expanding activities of regulatory agencies have required additional staff and Board travel. Utilities - The major item in the Utilities Expense Account is for purchased electrical power. Due to the delay in start-up of central power generation, this line item will exceed the budget allocation. Other Expenses - For items not chargeable elsewhere such as freight, safety supplies, grounds maintenance supplies, etc. Prior Year's Expense - This account is required by the Uniform Accounting System and represents adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from the previous year or payment of charges which could not be accrued at year end. Generally, all expenses to this account are recorded in the first quarter. Allocation to Districts and CDR F - This is an account established in connection with the cost accounting system and represents materials, supplies and services, overhead chargebacks to the individual Districts and CORF. CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND This fund accounts for the costs of expanding and improving the Districts' jointly- owned treatment and disposal facilities and represents an average of 39% (excluding reserves) of each Districts' budget requirements for 1992-93. During the first nine months, $35.3 million was expended on joint works treatment and disposal facilities improvement and expansion projects. The pro-rata share of joint works improvements and expansion costs is reflected in the financial statements of the respective Districts. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS - The statements reflect the accounting transactions for the nine Districts and include each respective District's share of the Joint Operating Fund and the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. Summary Financial Report Page 5 May 19, 1993 Taxes: Tax revenue is allocated to two separate accounts: Tax Allocation - This account represents the anticipated allocation of the Districts' pro-rate share of the maximum 1 % basic property tax allowed under Proposition 13, prior to the 92-93 state tax shift. Amounts received in the first quarter are essentially late payments from last year. Tax Levy - This account represents tax funds necessary to make voter-approved outstanding general obligation bond principal and interest payments. In accordance with the Jarvis-Gann initiative, tax levies to satisfy these obligations are not restricted. Only District 11 has a 1992-93 tax levy for bond service. Federal and State Construction Grants - EPA and SWRCB have historically funded up to 87 Yx % of treatment plant construction for approved projects. Current year receipts are the minimal outstanding balances on projects subsequent to final EPA and SWRCB review. Fees - All Districts now have an adopted, uniform sewer connection fee schedule. This account also reflects industrial waste user charges levied by seven of the nine Districts pursuant to the Uniform Industrial Waste Ordinance and the Revenue Program, and the user fees implemented in Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13. Annexation fee revenue is unpredictable and, thus, is not included in the budgets unless there is an existing agreement providing for payment of fees. Sale of Capacity Riahts - This account records income from sale of capacity rights to outside agencies such as SAWPA, including the capital replacement charge. SAWPA is billed in the fourth quarter each year. Joint Works Eauity Sale - Revenue from the annual joint facilities interdistrict equity adjustment required by the recalculation of the respective ownership percentages. Cost of this adjustment for purchasing Districts is included in each District's Share of Joint Works Construction. Share of Joint Works Construction - Represents each District's share of joint treatment and disposal facilities expansion discussed above under Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF). Bond Retirement and Interest Exoense - Payment of principal and interest on outstanding general obligation bonds and certificates of participation of the respective Districts. Annual budgeted expense for all Districts is approximately $39 million. Share of Joint Operating - Represents each District's share of operating and maintaining the jointly-owned treatment and disposal facilities, and administrative activities. Costs are distributed based upon each District's respective gallonage flow (see Joint `� Operating Fund statement for details). Summary Financial Report Page 6 May 19, 1993 District Operatina and Other Expenditures - Consists primarily of individual Districts' general operating expenses, industrial monitoring, operations, maintenance and repair of the respective Districts' collection systems. DD:GGS:lc C:W PDOCS\a,Iry.PVNUN-9.83 `V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SUMMARY JOINT OPERATINGINORRING CAPITAL POND BUDGET REVIEW 9 MONTHS ENDED 3131193 % APPROVED BUDGET YEAR-TO-DATE UNEXPENDED YEAR-TO-DATE 1992-93 EXPENDITURES BUDGET % EXPENDED \ , SALARIES, WAGES A BENEFITS Salaries A Wages 27,043.000 20,335,511 6,707,489 75,20% Payroll Benifits 5,606,000 4,452,515 1,153.485 79.42% TOTAL PAYROLL 32,649,000 24,788.026 7.860,974 75.92% Less: Chargeouts to DIETS S CORF (8,750,000) (6,948.722) (1,801,278) 79.41% NET JOINT OPERATING PAYROLL 23,899,000 17,839.304 6.059,696 74.64% MATERIALS, SUPPLIES A SERVICES Gasoline, Oil A Diesel 225.000 117,391 107,609 52.17% Insurance 1.190,000 754,200 435,800 63.38% Memberships 58.000 44,681 13,319 77.04% Office Expense 275.000 203,394 71,606 73.96% Chlorine 6 Odor Control 2,831,000 1.026,396 1.804,604 36.26% Chemical Coagulants 1.649,000 11150.688 498,312 69.78% Other Operating Supplies 965,000 753.590 211,410 78.09% Contractural Services 7,373.000 4,999,755 2.373,245 67,81% Professional Services 1.226,000 557,152 668,848 45.44% Printing A Publication 410,OOD 235,128 174,872 57.35% Equipment Rental 235.000 137.892 97.108 58.68% Repair A Maintenence 3.844,000 2,485,184 1.358,816 64.65% Research A Monitoring 2,906,000 1.747,843 1,158.157 60.15% Travel, Hearing A Training 250,000 109,815 140,185 43.93% Uacollectoble Accovats 30.D00 26.911 (16.911) 269.11% Utillities 4,422.000 5.035,744 (613,744) 113.88% Other Expenses 820.000 640,486 179,514 78.11% Prior Yeats Expense 100,000 16.589 83,411 16.59% Non Operatiiang Expense 60.000 36,188 23,812 60.31% TOTAL MATERIALS A SERVICES 28.849,OOD 20,079,027 8,769,973 69.60% Less: ALLOCATION TO DISTS A CORP (600.000) (363.435) (236,565) 60.57% NET JOINT OPER MATERIALS A SERVICE 28,249,000 19.715,592 8,533,408 69.79% \ea.o" TOTAL JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 52.148,000 37.554.896 14.593.104 72.02% REUNUR5 Revenues (3,510.000) (2.247,839) (1,262,161) 64.04% Less: Allocation to DIETS A CORP 10.000 40,702 (30,702) 407.02% NET JOINT OPERATING REVENUES (3.500,000) (2.207,137) (1.292,863) 63.06% NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSES 48.646.000 35.347,759 13,300.241 72.66% GALLONAGE DATA M.G. FLOW CHARGES DISTRICT BUDGET TO DATE BUDGET TO DATE 1 8,216 6.234 4.675.000 3,430,590 2 27.750 20.741 15,789,000 11.413,093 3 29.296 20.348 16,668.000 11.197.246 5 3,137 2.163 1.785,000 1.190.108 6 4,523 3.330 2,573,000 1.832.186 7 4.917 4.849 2,798,000 2.668.568 11 4.938 4.156 2,809,000 2,286.750 13 754 583 429.000 320.857 14 1.972 1,832 1,122.000 1.008,361 85.503 64,236 46.648.000 35,347,759 Canty Sanitation District go. 1 Suamary Quarterly Financial Report 9 Months Ended 3131193 Rudest Review I 1992 - 93 Remaining, Year-to-Date Budget Year-to-Date Budget % Expended Beginning Food Baleares, July 1 21,067.525 `�►" REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond F d(s) Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax Allocations/Subvention (Share of 1%) 2.060.000 1.161,373 896.627 56.38% Federal and State Construction Grants 0 1.804 (1.804) 0.00% Connection Pees 165,000 917 164.083 0.56% Other Pees 6.066,000 4.035.631 2.010.369 66.86% Sale of Capacity Rights '30.SO 0 130,000 0.00% Interest 6 Misc. Receipts 1.645,000 1.719,786 (74J86) 104.55% Other 0 0 0 0.00% Total Revonues 10.066,000 6,939,511 3,126,409 68.94% Total Revenue 6 Beginning Balances 28.007.036 EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Yorks Trot. Plant 6 Reserves 20.452,000 3.522.851 16,929,149 17.22% District Trunk Sever Constr. 4 Reserves 1.224,000 681.780 542.220 55.709 Bold Retirement and Interest Expense 9.142,000 506.631 8.633,369 5.56% Share of Joint Yorks Operating Expenses 4.675.000 3,430,590 1.244,410 73.38% Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% District Operating 6 Other Expenditures 650,000 332.210 317,790 51.11% Total Expenditures 36,143.000 8.476,062 27,666.938 23.45% Ending Fund Balances 19.530.974 Facilities Exammudan Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 7/1192 6 Additions Fixed Assets 3/31193 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: I 1 1-16 SA/Dyer Ed. Tnmk Modifications 253,608 409,314 661.922 2-30 Memory Lane Interceptor 1 6 2 51,461 273,466 324.927 Sub-Soul 305,069 681,780 0 906.849 Share of Joint Yorks 15.202.257 3,522,831 (2.805.385) 15.919.723 Sub-Total 15, 002.257 3,S22.951 (2.905.385) 15.919.723 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT 6 EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 31.390 81.398 Collection Lines and Pump Sans. 5.779,133 5.779,133 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 11.593 11,593 General Plant and Admin. Pacil. 50.241 58,241 Equity in Joint Treatment Pacil. 49.706,499 (116.642) 2.805.305 52,395,242 Other Assets at Cost Leas Amort. 0 0 Total Property Plant 6 Equip. 71.144,190 4.087,989 0 75.232.179 County Sanitation District No. 2 Smeary Quarterly Financial Report 9 Months Ended 3/31/93 B get Review 1992 - 93 Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Year-to-Dace Budget % Expended Beginning Fond Balances, July 1 147.527,049 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond Fual(s) Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax Allocetiom(Subventions (Share of 1%) 9.105,000 5.897.923 3.207.077 64.78% Federal and State Construction Grants 0 5.254 (5,254) 0.00% Connection Fees 1.351.000 1.758.884 (407.884) 130.19% Other Fees 19.227,000 14.296.193 4.930.907 74.35% Sale of Capacity Rights 375.000 0 375,000 0.00% Interest 6 Misc. Receipts 6.255,000 6.754.904 (499.904) 107.99% Other 0 0 0 0.00% Total Revenues 36,313.000 28,713,158 7,599.842 79.07% Total Revenue 6 Beginning Balances 176.240,207 EXPENDITURES: Sham of Joint Works Trent. Plant 6 Reserves 55,057,000 10,261.595 44.795.403 18,64% District Trunk Sewer Constr. 6 Reserves 28.201,000 1.642.072 26,538,926 5.82% Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 21.855.000 1.141,888 20,713.112 5.22% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 15,789,000 11.413,093 4,375,907 72.29% Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% District Operating 6 Other Expenditures 2,099,000 1,177.001 921,999 56.07% Total Expenditures 123,001,000 25,635.649 97,365,351 20.84% Ending Pand Balances 150.604,558 ac t es Exoens on Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 7/1192 A Additions Fixed Assets 3131193 \__ANSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: Foul Air Bypass 0 SARI Master Meter 0 2.713 2,713 2-14-4C From Santa Ana River 215 215 2-26-1, 2-26-2, 2-26-3 Euclid Interceptor Sewer 7.343.440 (7,343.440) 0 2-28 Estella Ruclid-Walnut 795.924 (795.924) 0 2-29 Orangewood Diversion 1.385,343 106.751 (1,492.094) 0 2-30 Memory Lane Int. 1 A 2 262.324 1.394.011 1.656,335 2-32 Sawpa Trunk Line Diversion Gate 6 Monitoring 59.248 (59.248) 0 2-31 SARI Relief Sewer 23.196 36.996 60.182 2-33 Palo Ave. Purchase Agreement 100 26,661 26,841 2-9-R1 Cypress Ave. Subtxunk Sewer Rehab. 71.468 74,049 145,517 Misc Chgs to Closed Work Orders 1.709 777 2.486 2-35 Euclid Trunk 6 Interceptor 0 114 114 Sub-Total 9,943,037 1,642,072 (9,690,706) 1,894.403 Share of Joint Works 44.282,158 10.261.595 (8,171.714) 46,372.039 Sub-Total 44.282.158 10,261.595 (8,171,714) 46.372,039 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PUNT A EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 517.694 517.694 Collection Lines and Ford, Stet. 82,069.257 (148.356) 9,690,706 91.611.607 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 33.172 33.172 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 200,649 200.649 Equity to Joint Treatment Facil. 142,030.171 (339,763) 8,271,714 149.862.122 Other Assets at Coat Lees Amort. 1,853 (1.853) 0 Total Property Plant 6 Equip. 279.077.991 11,413.695 0 290.491.686 County Sanitation District No. 3 Summary Quarterly Pimancial Report 9 Months Boded 3131193 Budget R.,. 1992 - 93 Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Ye,to-Date Budget Z Expended Beginning Rand Balances, July 1 142.438.309 REV KNOBS: Tex Levy (Bond Fund(s) Only) 0 0 0 0.00E Tax Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) 11,665,000 6,616.860 5.048,140 56.72% Federal and State Construction Grants 0 5.825 (5,825) 0.on Connection Pass $58.000 964.767 (106,767) 112.44% Other Fees 19.454,000 15.629.525 3,824,475 80.34% Sale of Capacity Rights 414,000 0 414,000 0.COX Interest A Misc. Receipts 6,891.000 6.465.634 425.366 93.83% Other 0 0 0 0.00% Total Revennes 39.282.000 29,682,611 9,599.389 75.56% Total Revmue A Beginning Solences 172,120,920 REFESEITURES: Share of Joint Works Trent. Plant A Eastman 63.749,000 11.375,202 52.373,798 17.84% District Trunk Sever Coast, 6 Reserves 19.786,000 380.981 19.405,019 1.93% Band Retirement and Interest Expense 22.215.000 1.375.834 20.839.166 6.In Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 16,668.000 11.197.246 5.470.754 67.In Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.an District Operating A Other Expenditures 4,435,000 1.386.107 3,048.893 31.25% Total Expenditures 126.853,000 25.715,370 101,137.630 20.27% Ending Fund Balances 146.405,550 Facilities on Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711192 6 Additions Fixed Assets 3131193 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 3-24-2 Lampson Interceptor Sauer 939,350 349.384 (1.288.734) 0 3-25 Orange-Western Sub-Trunk Relief Seger 49.900 49,900 11-17 Slater PIS Upgrade - 3 A 11 124,717 124.717 Seal Beach PIS M Upgrade 59,373 (59.373) 0 Westside PIS Motor Control Ctr Repl. 54,213 (54,113) 0 Techite Pipe Replacement 15,171 30,871 46.042 Miss Chg to Closed Work Orders 9 24 33 3-36R Repl. Westminster Ave. Force Mains 0 702 702 Sub-Total 1.242,633 380,981 (1.402.220) 221.394 Share of Joint Works 49.087.736 11,375,202 (9,058.523) 51.404,415 Ssh-Total 49.087,736 11,375,202 (9.058,523) 51,404,415 COMPLETED PROPERTY. PLANT A EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 280,231 280,231 Collection Linea and Pump Stems. 60,623,372 1,402,220 62.025.592 Treatment Facilities 9,922 9.922 Disposal Facilities 29,419 28,419 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 311.968 311.968 Equity in Joint Treatment Facil. 156,466.191 (376.634) 9.058,523 165,148.080 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. 12,648 (4,216) 8,432 Total Property Plant A Equip. 268,063.120 11.375.333 0 279,438.453 County Sanitation District ft. 5 Summary quarterly Financial Report 9 Months Bided 3131193 Sudnet Reviag 1992 - 93 Remaining Tear-to-Date \ i Budget Year-to-Date Budget % P.xpeMed tea/ Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 36.922,994 RBVIURVES: I" Levy (Bond Puod(s) Only) 0 0 0 0.00% I" Allocations/Subventions (Shure of 1%) 2.616.000 1,506.178 1,309,822 53.49% Federal and State Construction Grants 0 all (811) 0.on Connection Pees 235,000 37.670 197.330 16.03% Other Peas 2.045.000 1.698.825 346,175 83.07% Sale of Capacity Rights 58,000 114,591 (56,591) 197.57% Interest E Size. Receipts 1,303.000 1.214.958 88,042 93.24% Other 11849.000 0 1,849.000 0.on Total Revenues 0.306.000 4,573,033 3.732.967 55.06% Total Revenue E Beginning Balances 41,496.027 EXPENDITRES: Share of Joint Works Trmt. Plant E Reserves 8.895.000 1.504,746 7.310.252 17.82% District Trunk Server Constr. E Reserves 4,512.000 2.283,282 2,228.718 50.60% Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 3,254.000 102.670 3,151.330 3.16% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1.785,000 1.190.108 594,892 66.67% Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 109,000 0 109.000 0.00% District Operating E Other Expenditures 759.000 477.845 281,155 62.96% Total Expenditures 19.314.000 5,639,653 13,675.347 29.19% Ending Food Balances 35.857.374 Facilities exoaos on Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711192 6 Additions Fixed Assets 3131193 \J CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 5-33 Bey Bridge PIS Impr. 129.474 466.219 595.693 5-35 So. Coast Trunk Seser-Incl Phaeee 1 E 2 125.031 120.666 245.697 5-36 Crystal Cove PIS 233,972 15.228 149,2E 5-34 Bayside Or Trunk Serer Impr. Phases 1. 2 E 3.651,299 1,439.984 (1,387) 5.089.896 5-40 Our Del Mar PIS 8.427 8.427 Lido PIS 02 MSP Upgrade 32.012 (6.202) 25.870 Techite Pipe Replacement 2,414 2.414 Truskline Odor E Corrosion Cntrl Pilot Study 24.364 24,364 Miscellaneous Charges to Closed M.O. 0 1.076 1.076 Miscellaneous Charges to Closed M.O. 5 6 6 132 5.775 5.907 5-32 Bitter Pt 6 Rocky PC PIS Improv. 5 E 6 30.609 $7.800 68,409 5-37-364 FOR Gravity Srr Rehab 5 6 6 3.139 29,047 32.186 5-38 Siphon 0 SAR Slpbm 5 E 6 8.580 8.560 5-39 Siphon 5 E 6 541.501 153,699 695,190 Sub-Total 4,691,014 2.20,282 (1,367) 6.972,909 Share of Joint Works 6.838.706 1.564.748 (1,261,997) 7,161.457 Sub-Total 6.838.706 1.584.746 (1,261,997) 7.161.457 COMPLETED PROPERTY. PLANT 4 EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 6,231 6.231 Collection Lines and Pump Stec. 23,529.079 (927,545) 1.387 22.602.921 Treatmmt Facilities 7.347 7.347 Disposal Facilities 7.115 7.115 General Plant and Admin. Pacil. 27.347 21.347 Equity in Joint Treatmmc Peril. 21,341.179 (52,471) 1.261,997 22.550.705 Other Assets at Coat Less Amort. 76.577 (15.663) 60,914 Total Property Plant 6 Equip. 56,524.595 2.872,351 0 59,396,946 County Sanitation District No. 6 Summary Quarterly Financial Report 9 Months Boded 3131/93 Balser Davis. 1992 - 93 Remaining Year-to-V- Budget Year-to-Date Budget % expe{ Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 21,035,875 REVENUES: - Tax Levy (Bond Fund(e) Only) 0 0 0 0.00% Tax Allocations/subventions (Share of 1%) 1.467.000 913,730 553,270 62.29% Federal Connectioand FeeState Construction Grants 141.000 227.491 (86,491) 161.34% Other Pees 3,040,000 2,082,354 957,646 68.50% Sale of Capacity Rights 71.000 23,341 47.659 32.87% Interest 6 Misc. Receipts 903,000 851,982 51,018 94.35% Other 1,026,000 0 1,026,000 0.00% Total Revenues 6,648,000 41099,898 2.548,102 61.67% Total Revenue R Beginning Balances 25,135,773 EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Works Tint. Plant 6 Reserves 10,447,000 1,952,380 8,494.620 18.69% District Trunk Sewer Constr. 6 Reserves 1.274,000 385,346 888.654 30.25% Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 2.284.000 219,479 2.064,521 9.61% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2.573.000 1.832.186 740.814 71.21% Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% District Operating 6 Other Expenditures 301,000 165,133 135,867 54.86% Total Expenditures 16,879,000 4,554,524 12,324,476 26.98% Ending Fund Balances 20.581,249 Facilities Excansion Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711192 6 Additions Fixed Assets 3/311' CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 14-1-1 A R B Gisler Inc, 14-1-2 Baker Street 244.873 237,840 482.713 6-12 Pairveiw Relief 246,406 1.861 248.267 5-32 Bitter Pt 6 Rocky Pt PIS Improvements 5 R 6 11,132 21,022 32,154 Trunkline Odor 6 Corrosion Cacti Pilot Study 5 6 6 24.364 24.364 5-37-364 PCB Gravity Swe Rehab 5 6 6 2,370 116,189 118.559 5-38 Siphon 0 SAM Siphon 5 6 6 20.021 20,021 5-39 Siphon 6 the SAR Siphon/Plt 2 5 6 6 28.500 8.089 36.589 Miscellaneous Charges to Closed Work Order 5 6 6 0 345 345 Sub-Total 577,666 385,346 0 963,012 Share of Joint Works 8.425.162 1.952.380 (1,554,758) 8.822,784 Sub-Total 8,425.162 1,952,380 (1,554.758) 8.822,784 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT 6 EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 562 562 Collection Lines and Pump Sena. 1.786.890 (18,024) 1.768.866 Treatment Facilities 2,653 2.653 Disposal Facilities 7.394 7,394 General Plant and Admin. Pacil. 93.421 93.421 Equity in Joint Treatment Peril. 26,152.141 (64.644) 1.554.758 27.642.255 Other Assets at Cost Less Abort. 19,144 (3,915) 15.229 Total Property Plant 6 Equip. 37,065,033 2.251,143 0 39.316.176 County Sanitation District No. 7 Summary Quarterly Financial Report 9 Months Ended 3132193 Budget Revie. 1992 - 93 Remaining Year-to-Dare Budget Year-to-Date Budget % Expended .eapeginning Food Wears.. July 1 63.170.422 REVENUES: I. levy (Bond Pand(s) Only) 0 0 0 D.00% Tex Allocations/Subventions (Share of 1%) 4.430,000 2,062.485 2.367.515 46,56% Federal and State Construction Grants 0 1,303 (1,303) 0.00% Connection Fees 470,000 103.902 366,098 22.11% Other Fees 5.010.000 3.442.474 1.567.526 66.71% Sale of Capacity Rights 93.000 0 93.000 0.00% Interest 6 Mier. Receipts 2.589.000 2.489.646 99,354 96.16% Other 3,458,000 0 3.468.000 0.00% Total Revennss 16,060.000 81099.810 7,960,190 50.43% Total Revenue 6 Beginning Balances 71,270.232 EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Works Trent. Plant 6 Reserves 13.619.00D 2,544.876 11.074,124 18.69% District Trunk Sewer Constr. 6 Reserves 17.235.000 3.181.635 14.053.365 18.46% Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 4.235.000 252.781 3.982.219 5.97% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2.798.000 2.668.56E 129.432 95.37% Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% District Operating 6 Other Expenditures 11598,000 1.004.515 583.485 63.26% Total Expenditures 39,475,000 9,652,375 29.822,625 24.45% Ending Food Balances 61,611.657 Facilities Extension gainers Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711192 6 Additions Fixed Assets 3/31193 -gNSTNUCTION IN PROGRESS: \�eF,1B Orange Park Acres Sewec Study 0 5.104 5,104 23 Gisler-Red Hill Parallel EM 0 342 342 7-19 Cowen Heights Sauer 0 30.412 30.412 7-7-1 Wain Street PIS 11.501 543 (652) 11.392 Sewer Design for Met Tustin Specific Plan 17.798 17.798 14-1-M 6 B Gisler cut.. 14-1-2 Baker Street Force Main Districts 6, 7 6 14 493.423 540.905 1.034,328 Reconstruct Siphon at A.D. 04 11,205 (11.205) 0 7-11-1. 2, 3 Abnndonnent and Modif, of PIS 3,748.212 188.506 (2.195.269) 1.741.449 But Mtne Reassert Index Books 13,237 13.237 Agreant N/Costa Mega He Fairview Subtrunk Sewer 26.983 (26.983) 0 7-14 Abandon 9 PIS 99.186 162.919 262.105 7-3E-2 IEM-Nwprt Subtrlmk Relief Sewer 227,701 99.515 (327.296) 0 7-6-1-1 Sunflower Inc. 18.529 224 18.753 7-15 Crawford Canyon 139.032 (136.032) 0 7-16 Lemon Heights Sewer 56.850 243 57.093 7-1-1 Gisler/Redhill Trunk Abandonment 1.623 659 2.282 Techite Pipe Replacement 345 8.505 8.050 7-20 Navy Way PIS Abandonsent 777 65,857 96.634 7-17 Orange Park Acres Sewer Repl. 44 44 7-1B-2 Delhi Channel Siphon 785 66.863 67.648 7-IB-1 Mac Arthur Trunk A 3.089 66,727 69.816 Harvard Ave. Trunk Sewer 110 1.922.752 1.922.862 Main Street Flume Plowmeter 230 1.559 (221) 1.568 Sub-Total 4,069.740 3.161.635 (2,699.656) 5,351.717 Share of Joint Works 10.981.975 2.544.876 (2.026,585) 11,300.266 Sub-Total 10.981,975 2.544,976 (2,D26,565) 11.500.266 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT 6 EQUIP: land and Property Rights 276,454 276.454 Collection Lines and Pump Stye. 28,566.281 2.699.437 31.265.718 Treatment Facilities 0 0 ^isposal Facilities 10.782 10.782 eral Plant and Admia. Peril. 78.081 78.081 yicy in Joint Treatment Facil. 34,015.595 (84,260) 2,026.585 35.957.920 rZb` er Assets at Mat lees Amort. 42.172 (11,292) 221 31,101 Total Property Plant 6 Equip. 78.841,080 5.630.959 0 84,472.039 County Sanitation District No. 11 Summary Quarterly Financial Report 9 Months Ended 3131193 n set Review 1992 - 93 Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Year-to-Date Budget % Expended Beginning Fund Balances, July 1 44.959,044 REVENUES: Tex Levy (Bond Fand(s) Only) 13.000 6.315 6,685 0.00% Tax Allocations ISubventfons (Share of 1%) 2.017.000 1.298.160 718.84n 64.36% Federal and State Construction Ornate 0 1.093 (1,093) 0.00% Connection Pees 470,000 318.670 151.330 67.80% Other Pees 3,915.000 2.053,023 1.861.977 52.44% Sale of Capacity Rights 78.000 0 76,000 0.00% Interest 6 Wisc. Receipts 1.617.000 1.683.663 (66.663) 104.12% Other 1,869.000 0 1.869.000 0.on Total Revenues 9,979,000 5,360,924 4,618.076 53.72% Total Revenue 6 Beginning Balances 50,319.969 EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Works Trat. Plant B Reserves 11.488.000 2,134.411 9,353.589 18.58% District Trunk Sewer Constr. 6 Reserves 11.818.000 29.914 11,788.086 0.25% Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 4.673.000 350.950 4.322.050 7.51% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 2.809.000 2.286,750 522.250 81.41% Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% District Operating 6 Other Expenditures 865.000 617,762 247.238 71.42% Total Expenditures 31,653,000 5,419.787 26.233.213 17.12% Ending Fund Balances 44.900,181 Facilities Balance Adjustments Transfer to Balance 711i92 6 Additions Fixed Assets 3131/93 CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: 11-17 Slater P(S Seaage Sys Improv. 644.806 29.914 674.720 Sub-Total 644.806 29.914 a 674.720 Share of Joint Works 9,210,689 2.134,411 (1.699.716) 9.645.384 Sub-Total 9,210,689 2,134,411 (1,699,716) 9,645,364 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT 6 EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 146.986 146,986 Collection Lima and Pump Stns. 29.011.158 19,011.158 Treatmeat Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 3.053 3.053 General Plant and Admin. Facil. 28.699 28.699 Equity 1n Joint Treatment Facil. 28,612.529 (70.671) 1,699,716 30.241.574 Other Assets at Cost Lees Amo[t. 0 0 Total Property Plant 6 Equip. 57.657,920 2.099,654 0 S9,753,574 ' County Sanitation District No. 13 Summary Quarterly Financial Report 9 Months Ended 3131193 Rudest Review 1992 - 93 Remaining Year-to-Date `J Budget Year-to-Date Rudget % Expended Beginning Food Balanees, July 1 11,459.512 REVENUES: Tax Levy (Bond pund(s) Daly) 0 0 0 0.on Tax Allocations/Subvention, (Share of 1%) 0 0 0 0.on Federal and State Construction Grants 0 119 (119) 0.on Connection Pees 235.000 437.100 (202.100) 166.000 Other Pees 674.000 426.986 247,014 63.35% Sale of Capacity Rights 8.000 0 8.000 0.008 Interest 6 Misc. Receipts 103.G00 649.643 53.357 92.418 Other 0 0 0 0.an Total Revenues 1,620.000 1,513.840 106,152 93.45% Total Revenue 6 Beginning Balances 12,973,360 EXIMMITURES: Share of Joint Works Trot. Plant 6 Reserves 2.423.000 232.001 2.190.999 9.578 District Trunk Seger Constr. 6 Reserves 7.933.000 0 7,933.000 0.an Bond Retiremeat and Interest Expense 28.000 6.476 21.524 23.13% Share of Joint Work, Operating Expenses 429.000 320.857 IN.143 74.79% Provided for Reimbur,ememt Agreements 0 0 0 GINS District Operating 6 Other Expenditures 173.000 33.571 139.429 19AUS, Total Expenditures 10.986,000 592.905 10.393,095 5.40E Ending Fund Balances 12,380,455 Facilities Brommoo ion ce 7111192 edAddlit Transfer tions Fixed Assets 31 1/93 �HSTRUGTION IN PROGRESS: Share of Joint Works 1.001.161 232.001 (184,751) 1.048,411 Sub-Total 1.001.161 232.W1 (184.751) 1.048,411 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT 6 EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 0 0 Collection Lines and Pump Stem. 0 2,135.657 2.135.657 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 0 0 General Plant and Admire. Peril. 0 0 Equity 1n Joint Treatment Facil. 3.087.982 (7.681) 184,751 3.265.052 Other Assets at Coat Less Aaort. 0 0 Total Property Plant A equip. 4,089,143 2.359.977 0 6.449.120 County Sanitation District No. 14 , Soaaary quarterly Financial Report 9 Months Ended 3/31/93 Bodnar R 4 1992 - 93 Remaining Year-to-Date Budget Year-to-Date Budget % Expended Beginning Pend Balances, July 1 34.830,432 REVENUES: Tnx Levy (Bused Pund(s) Only) 0 0 0 0.on Tax A1loeatlonslSubventions (Share of 1%) 0 0 0 0.on Federal and State Construction Grunts 0 1.067 (1.067) 0.00% Connection Pees 14.100,000 6,167.854 7,932,146 43.74% Other Pees 0 3.000 (3,000) 0.on Sale of Capacity Rights 76,000 0 76,000 0.on Interest A Misc. Receipts 421,000 205.355 215,645 48.78% Other 0 0 0 0.00% Total Revenues 14,597,000 6,377.276 8.219,724 43.69% Total Revenue A Beginning Balances 41.207,708 EXPENDITURES: Share of Joint Works Trot. Plant A Reserves 13.118.000 2,084,444 11.033.556 15.89% District Trunk Sewer Constr. A Resetves 4.300.000 2,311,208 1.988.792 53.75% Bond Retirement and Interest Expense 165,000 38,092 126,908 23.09% Share of Joint Works Operating Expenses 1,122,000 1.008,361 113.639 89.87% Provided for Reimbursement Agreements 0 0 0 0.00% District Operating A Other Expenditures 446.000 115.367 330.633 25.87% Total Expenditures 19,151.000 5,557,472 13.593,528 29.02% Ending Food Balances 35.650.236 Facilities Expanei. Balance Adjustments Transfer to Galatea, 711192 A Additions Fixed Assets 3131193 � / CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS: `a✓ SJBPC Capacity Purchase 0 882,204 (878,730) 31554 Mein Street Plume Flowmeter 0 2,544 2.544 14-1-1 A A E Gisler Int., 14-1-2 Baker St. Force Mein, Districts 6, 7 A 14 1.225,682 1,385.576 2.611.258 Main St. Pump Station Improvements 7-7-1 27.927 40,804 68,731 Sub-Total 1,253.609 2,311,208 (878,730) 2.686,087 Share of Joint Works 8,995.054 2,084.444 (1.659,925) 9,419.573 Sub-Total 8.995.054 2,084,444 (1,659.925) 9.419,573 COMPLETED PROPERTY, PLANT A EQUIP: Land and Property Rights 0 0 Collection Lines and Pump Stan. 15.752.758 878.730 16.631.468 Treatment Facilities 0 0 Disposal Facilities 0 0 General Plant and Admin. Pecil. 6.747 6.747 Equity in Joint Treatment Pacil. 27.813.040 (69.016) 1,659.925 29.403.949 Other Assets at Cost Less Amort. 0 0 Total Property Plant 6 Equip. 53,821,208 4,326,636 0 58,147,844 reel 1a wfw ..OL"N rvN axrwu sa atnouar oI I01 x0au BNeT.NTIN n Bly.. In• 1 of a ]Scat rw amp 9 x1NS Inn 3/3l/93 (1) (2) n1 (O (9) (a) meal anlNo 1m.1. B]WI9]e BCNMIurN NNan Tw Panto ao! vro]en Mn]exoro amen PNasn en ROUT MT onuT runes. re Body enNx tau-9a 19.a-n • al]onx To 1/IIIN nags Inn] n MT. I - a A. o. ...l st ices Plsnl 1 I. Ssnansol« 01., . fuels .tea P141-1/E/l n991-B,. BS,NO 55.00 2 a 93.no E. art«ry fl•elflafe Men. 0-15. PI-]J 53709.0 45.910.000 290.ro0 11.802, 03,192 11.110 ]$..I9a a. Cgs IIOneII16 facilities, 11-34-1 1]110-n 11.430.000 IB AB 138.99E (033.1111 1.3.87, 783,111 A. It...Inc. 11-I6. 1I-I9-3 13110-C 29.900.000 0,500,400 23,193.41. 3.911.037 E1-]n,a91 2.986.263 I. OOMO of o1...let. 0 . 10. 11-15-E 51019-n 1,4E0.000 10.000 130 130 9,a10 S. Secondary Trot Expansion to BO On, PI-]. 5311E.0 41.000.00 Id00.040 3.032,341 I13.000 3.112,352 1,39..199 1. frlory tn«.ml 11 men [epan9lan. 11-]l $3719-0 II.n0.0N t,NO,ON 103.08, 9.90. I13.182 9n,09B •. 9«urlty a IaM«aNN. PI-30-1 9EIOB-r I.135.000 t.000.000 41.421 41.1.9 s5.n1 992.00E 9. .1n. media. Priority Sion.. PI-38-2 52108-0 1.650.00 8.750.000 270.019 288.103 I34,181 ..911.09E 10. 9.Is1e Ulradi, . Sly-1. SoA PI-BB Sin5-0 EE.800.000 I.NO.NO 268.11, 28.490 111-E05 1.411.90, lr.n.l.r In In).n Satre (N0.PN1 ROOM.1 ll-91 Nobs of Sri.alarm... I.. . s 111.MB 2.030,200 200.000 9..as 9.041 120.952 n. Nile. me01ua«lames n-as-., 5 9210e-x.I I8,110.0N 4.0001.0. 53I,215 ".Or. Sn,251 3.105.958 Transfer to vm)«ls s61m BOAS n00.N05 facility oddly.. ..f.t,UNne«. PI-a0 5.18E-0 a.nl.n0 400.000 32.937 33.93E 367.061 first ..still, Walt.. . $.fall VNmex at rise, 1.11-40-I mein-a no.ro0 IN,000 $so BN 11.140 fa. Textron . safety Upgrade@ .t at get I. PI-40-2 Saint-s BOA.. ISOAQ. 5,190 S.no IN,BI➢ .I., Inrewasenu .I plans 1, PI-42 $2212-0 Im,000 150.000 8,511 6,011 1.3,20, S.un .,m111 01 Nm m m-slclo sysl«., n-43 SE229-B 3.450.000 lE. NII Preams (9 "it.) I1.5a0,oss 13. o1..e ... 1 . Its' Streeter 9.100.000 la. InM3y Inner p.mrotlm 4........ 59.o0S 10400 it. 13. [I«teleel .1 01«Ilbtlan E.]N,NO Id. nstrlflntlan Project 1.100.000 11. Mre.«y Iran.. 4.000.000 is. se«.. frmulq raters I a 3 1.000.000 19. ren l-I B1r .1,....1 alulm 250,N0 10. a0n0 oxygen Bcll.atod Blurs• . Cry'. 70.000.000 21. Solids Storage n Sinai 111000.000 22. nu.. Pm)«n (x. anclul. n 10.210.000 SAM... 14,01I 241,719 211,012 1.9,28E 23. atmr..,or Plan rml«l. St. I ].Wadi. 1n.. 14.250.065 b. x ad-,.. m.2 uwll•rlP,vp spend. MI. aAn Ago c. .0«v Trickling filters 2 . a. 2001 1A.A" e. 40 nod oxygen Act'e awn err, 201E IS Me.eN o. 0q•stst : r S u0. 01s. 2003 a 2012 MAMMA o a salt Try- , 004 MA NAM, a. 12 pe !Saar pu,rlW,lan. 2001-E012 1.100.000 b. Standby Parer p.nsnum. 2005 1 2oIS 5.......0 1. 12 Had Primary Treatment. 20" s 301E Ix,Sno t0000 0 IICLAHnloy floor 1 n5.H1,r 13,711,0E 20.201.221 1 4.211.241 J1.191.H. 19.105,011 YIRu..1. »90 .... .-I Iu1NR or JRR wm aamuR(M ea»mm�e ve. x•r f ' n•m lees ua-aa e wme mb i/ill9) (1) (O In al mien+»93 amlm 9rMNYiae m9m m9 Mp ne m1M M tlan. Ipe[ MpleR eai mOR WR NIYa m n nn aYE9R apn »9x-9] 093-9I • en0/93 +0 1/11/aa 119n 993Rf e. 1 wet vtwl z 1. 6u0Wet htllltb• an 911. 1•prtuwWle •. »•ntlw• Nlialy. r1-}J-f-I fR}S-0 3,9xf,0e0 i.l.Srro. I0,810 1n.se0 axf,»O xA(Idlp p. Y•Inaan NI(a1N. rl-a3-x Ilala-r 1,333.0. ...... (Ix.a(a ...100 ....... (l.t1.1 o. .. phlxu.w Nua1M , n-va uen-r lAoo.vao se.ano (el,eev tv.feo ul,lev .ep a. rro t«uw awrwurt OIII-. n-33-9 neu-0 xae,aa0 (ve,aa lo,R+ sf.n• Rf sv ».OR .. rn.o n fY•9 .111, In.. rlal-s s(eu-a x.xf0,0aa se.a» W.I. xe.aR n anab o4••hr (. 1. .. n-»-I 1200-e eAxa,ao0 (n,aa I.j.. Ix uLln 3. ..Wa pq••M 1, x. ex-Ja-x 4.300.000 Ia,roe lao,ae f. an.mawur a,o, n-]9a s.Jee,epo (oo,an Men s. erlurr rr••lret lr MD aanattat. n-tl 5171.-1, (o.M.0a x.n• I,etz b»I (I.m e. nw.=(Orttlw PWI«I. n-»-1 nne-9 .......... e".an 0.1...436 ne.af] ..tn.sn (M.2331 7. .1111-1.1 upeau, n-02-1 9• fnu-e.o 23.310.000 1.... ........ Ia.no 1,415.43. ben-olx e. .1.11r nl«. an. , n- 3-1 am-e ......... 2.50e.M 116.11e ul,ea en.nt x,aa.l» 9. u(n(e oiler a.,n-n shoe-0 Man.." 3.00.0. 180.1.2 (ae,33a en,(t] i,611.4.1 a. b R . m helFRt paw te R (sn.00el lea.a» of Pelrltn 1 tpW O. • fxa99-0 e.(fLe00 ne.000 x(.eal I(.alf 1».fa lo. nh=. I.rRlwtlw n-a-3. ] ulae-aR uaa.aa0 6}a.ae a.a➢ s(An nw3x a.sn.0. art M to ertl«I. 1... n00.40 u"...1 M.Illa,MIN 9I,-R V�I•hr R-a sae9-e fsxxsa Man n.u9 u,le9 ler,em n•rarlm rte Nrun. 1 a.[aty Dome•.a rant x, n-sul uua-a 1 0.0. In.ea sa M ISO" h= 11.11, aWue•a e.r.q am.. I. a nun x. vl-a-x lxua-. In.m. (a.m M. 4aa ».3» " e nt-alt a a a_.t I. n-s allx0-a 9ae,0e0 xa.m b11. t.x•a (».m "We e•tMle er Yw-•tr.0- 9Mw•, ex-60 nxxv-e 9.»s.eae Rt .1. nt n. NnR«/pnml sRtw. n-an« a-R-u urot-o 1,an.a00 Lns,m 39e,M Lm,we I,nt.esn 60na22 ]z. our. new.: a •N. sd n. pur marlNnw .,ant. vx-a nns-o at0.000ro.ape n,an m a,ea xLm a.ne It. at.wur rw0 et I,- l.in.a0a 13. utMp I a pnal I. I1..n.en s0.voo lo.a0 u. 9raw=ul m !I Dana• .AaMn owl«r• I.e.p•a=1.or IL0ao,0eo Loro.an a,1a Rrper 228.933 exxAn (e. an•r nu a.Mat Ml«h .. WI_ re(t•tY Winn... a. O. .0 u.+n.000 vtWer !w•r p eWlalwat.w. HIM. n. pnu.rlM w ( aratw. loos HIM. •n-.1 - Imrlml} a. i 9n.ao.]n n.u0,000 n.na.eR 1.m9.aa u.eeapea ae.nf.a1 e. .«mlin eaant •1(u 3• t=wumw.r en•. le,an,aa Man ne,eee x. .«a...uw nwt a nIn-. se.aen,aae nz,ea u9.ua tos.as uu.nn We-m.l- anon., euna n.aro.no Ino,oeo noon (YAY a1.ne uLsm 0. mYnlwl aM aomt !•=umH a. Yhrylul M1el(Wa, 1-9 .. ue• t.1.111 nl A.. snu-o xo,foe.oae R.rro,en l,ms.aa r,re.Rf Is.eu.n( idf+.eas r.wnr Io rwl«t ••.a, u.»e.eln (l.ave,alo .w.1110 1.11=n at otl wu 91ha tt vlt z 11111-o a W."n (.na.w aan.vl e,av Lxu.m ],nl.0ze I. (Mama YY.1 u.9 uwlnn Rw xn. a nnl-e aoo.000 soo,00e (Late 111 In IeLepe lxe.etp o. ola.•ur h. zl« r nm-o .,9oa.eea (.eao.pn0 L»f.we -a A(a xao,en a. r=wYnumm�o rml. �r ,vn-a sa.ope >eo.rW la.o.t sa.` ut.nf CeP1uL O Y 6=,M`d NMD .emu 6-1 6Vg1eBT OP JOIA YOHf9 wPe3BVC1106 6WV]]YI]lli] Page ] o] + rI6Gt T118 1993-9] 9 ... 6w60 NMI. (1) (L) (3) UI (6) le) HF l6w Mega e]Wlew eCCOwNSN CU96]M T1J6 PLR. l09 PwRCT .:...IO.. P.J6R 6. am.T 60]T OVT." 1 .am 50 .eT pypL•6T 1991-93 1191-93 . 613O/93 So 11311.1 r1i30 N.". TO WTe 1 - ] 1. ladder, helllHae eM Ab leprn««b I. e6aI.. BLOB. sap«. 6 ..b.b.. J-1-869 519)1-0,8 1.200.000 100.00 l,239,044 MASS l,]"An N,wl 0. Again Bldg an«a 6 O10 Lab Site, J-30 S2083-0 +. MAGO INA00 6e,811 26.932 9S.O03 l3],we o. ran".! Labors'." l-ll Was-O 1.100.000 .00.000 .55.316 (512.950, INAH (163.MS) O. Ope«time/Cons«I Carter, J-25-1 33111-1 +A2SA00 SSOAN 4.052.321 389,331 4.634.541 (31.1)3) e. reept« SOoigant. J-13-9 Mae %NO 53133-6 I.TSO,000 e13Aw 318A11 IAIZA.0 IaL➢AS2 (907.1401 I. NnmmLL Sol1UN at Pit 1. J-36 S3716-0 l.l0o,ow ISOA00 MAN 31.000 104.210 in'.. a• Or«Iltiun .1 Old ..,.I ..,at 6)0,o0O n. semolina..1 "part IId.AP1. 1-21 1308+-O 1.050.000 10.000 67.Oe1 21,690 $9.151 (12.920 1. Opm 0111« Pumilum bye Pmtoul n-063 1313e-0 900.000 1]O,000 ISO Ads ]. Cart«! 6w«t1M .11111 .. SOUlpant S«pur.ba«, 1-U. 531.-C 31.00.000 300,000 10.353.046 93.19] 20.3+6.543 206.405 I. God-Loo Pur.n..., 1-11. 53107-..] 3.050.000 1A.Ae0 S.O50A80 C. PWt I r«lllty. 1-19-1 wl.-e ........0 6.000.000 14.596,315 Saida's 19,702,540 41.1+e.224) I. Pont 3 P«lllb. 1-19-3 53101-9 27,000.000 1,ID0,000 IS,Oe3.610 1.303.019 I1.384.w3 (L10i.01B1 1-10-1 6nSl« A«N SMrb 6 Plant 3 531.-9 99+.." 830 994.338 995.166 1-19-1 fool« p«l. eebab. plant 1 sump ].Aso ...ASO U.As0 Yleelar. rabnal for ub ears. Ca«Mora 31130-0 IAG..o00 33,rd0 !law +. 1hat. Bob slave. J-31, J-311 510.0-C 130.000 35,000 51.719 $1,119 (21.1121 A Damn . W. - Nsp Alban.« .. 9eplum To- ftnall ]ears, 1.M.I(4M) 53713-0 1.110.00 LOAN I. MAM 5,611 IAM.848 +,513 I. 9epl. anal No. 11.od 6«ti«a-113 531I.-e 1.316.00 1,00o,0a0 302,153 1A42,160 1,552.313 (M9 AGO) C. ]« on. *0u.1 ].. I. l-n-I S.SO0,0. e. 1«1 r13 R.IIN far N.IL St. I xW.No .. ]e.ano o5a.0.r6. "War bard -c- f. frt. n^ 1. 0«P sal. V/I20• at9al 10.000.000 I. L0u]«ant 1«11tLaaa 1-15-. 93703.A +.131,0eo 100,0. llaaa I,.. Baas GOALS e. Wilmot rl0«eter . at hail.A-l.Je/e 530.5-0 125,000 lo,w0 I 1 0A. f. Pr.w«tl.n 01 Vtilit, etW 1-39-1 3eii0-0 S.B.M. 1..0,.0 53.109 5.184 $0.113 MSAN 9. L1wtl. .1 snlobt ... a1Wi.. J-na 5eue-a no,Ow 160,00 x90,o. 9. I...phon./rile«t,y N.nit.rin6 IN. I-ae 1a14e-0 S.A. .0,.o Go AN nme NAM 31101,n. w. ... Loup ml T.«. xp1.C«e.l MANA00 Il. Llae .aw«I rr.Jeate .. removal Pa«n9l-nom Plant 9.000,009 I. Lana a.vuNitim 3 AmAw 50,00. 1..do. .. L+Null 0.r.laLwnt Mad. 1 Sl Am.000 I. r«W.I 9aelllty 13. OJ.tri.t inf.r«tlm ]nu9aemt ].twrl a. .1.I. 1 oper 0ynt COap.er System slag-. 900..0 In:.a0 wA90 u3,101 (w1,ew1 119,130 Iw,9M b. Lab mfa«allm ..-.at Syelee Sol..-. $50.000 1. 0. wl,iss) w.w1 u.6w) man U473 e. luran.ein./rWdnmry Cantml !yet« 450.000 10,0V0 N.A. O. ecewnlln./pnamla Mt-alon ]ynt« 1a149-O 5IGA00 :00.000 !,bail 1A31i 490.1a8 baba Tarn 9sev. ay.l e. Waldron. I30.000 120.0.0 n..000 1...., .1 JOINT w9l] wXRX9CT10X 9{wl[NaM9 Pep 1 .1 1 Ppc1L MA 199343 9 wMM Lmw 1/31/9L (1) (3) (3) (4) Isl (a) wu a9vlsu TmAt L6Wnw AC MI MCY1T Teu 1Tw :so I= MKIP 0 Omn PXOJBC! 1a5 eOpLrt MIM`A, TWlsru to N9T ewcM 199x-M IMxA1 B e/]0/9x TO 1N1/93 Flags LAMS To .AT[ 1 - ] 13. bleeltn Cant: 5913 W lor1. Can. 91+9.1 I,3w.000 1,300,000 1.200.000 14. ..m Hazardous state buectJOn NcSlw... .00,OOo mO,o9a I90.ow u. IwmvW b-Pl.nt suplW btilltb... Jax sx:u-s x50,Ow 1.... 41,171 41,172 Ioe.M9 1e. pecpu...t' W.! Ca.aml Ntuule.. x,000.000 I,000.000 Lsoo,a00 IT. Yaer Ou.11Tl I0..11 B1Wr 59xx1.0 u p ,Ax O,OW 10.000 15.5.3 0.6xs1 b.9+e +Os IS. Tech". eI, Cl.,. . 401 IJt s1ue.1 Jd9 54111-0 ISs.000 100,000 5.051 5.03s 100.000 19. Xlet PSro)6cN 13Be 9anedula 61 11.000.400 1.0.0..46 ".let 152.910 219.091 b+,090 x0. Otner Aeelee Plen NWaete e. Bepibe 19• out Nll Nth 1!0• MI 30,1w,000 O. bp.W0A -C,- to Porth 1019 b,1x3:a.. e. = : Otep. Landfill Its- 11 tell IS,800,Ow O. 91W8a O/ep. CgaI, ... 1 1 11 AM II 500 000 ..9-TOTU - Most. .J01M 497.791.400 31.260.000 19.739.095 25.192.531 (623.1041 101.909.06E 3.681,1.9 .I -TOTAL - MIT. I.'.. Lx30,OT.WO I4,i13,Ow I]L3N.8W N,IM,936 16x9.160113.103,193 41.Om,Ob A. 'gaZi I.Jea'I.. 9tWbe 1 Nxe9ch A. .,it- PW: 1. XPDT9 re:.lt { Appllcetfan) .8209-1 315.000 50.00. 2111,113 45.331 336,011 9.+.9 3. Xw19 Nvlt IXOnllwlnO CneWesl 30.000 50.000 wino ]. XPo34 Penit ( Ween Ope Beul IOO.000 20G.000 lOO.WO .. NIIOe Tlptxn., OI...i ass' X.ub L390.000 200.000 100.000 ".nef.! .A Project NIm T 1 (M9) BIWp ObWul NIetw PmJetY 583b-0 A19 ]al.11. .19 .51,+9+ C. N.p Oc.en Elepobl NJWtIW 5113F0 1.521.000 SO.000 57B.S29 519.539 50.000 0. ue Oueuq In.rol PJWen A. AIr ..to, o Isviscl uAW. Y/ iMVS 5821e-0 Lux.WO 250.0o0 wO,ps x.lu +a.IOA 3a,039 TAt Is. - Nlast<. .... as0,op9) IISO.OWI Lle TOIIc. Nl.aau .mmtseY beet IYlsl . Xwltn Ola] A.eesoent I Ass I 39330-A 630.09E 35.01E 16I.538 30,01E Ie3.555 wC . .1; la Jt b heat P Iwaaa r NaC.0 102IB-0 $50.000 323.981 161.39 ]15.41. 115.412 594.5011 3. PO[/lai .Iga saeat- TtBm Prvieu 5Bxi1-0 850.000 6WON 5.619 s,119 5so.." ]. LII b10.luns Nuree CmtWl 500,000 60.000 IO.Om 1. ➢taw lute 1]1.I . 5.1.000 I50.000 ISO.WO !. to,Ow a- .1+9:PWY W. 513.000 505.000 145.0 . A. vete!Coee.ry . J-1. I n em Prol.cte ],0s0.0m Ios,00o 121.430 Treat Be m NoJeat. blow u69.260> ux9.uO) a.L1 ban x.a.Water Fa.jb1 erv.ln..WT 52133-9 b,:e9 u,xao ism xsse 89.24. nw monitoring tot X.Na Cw.a- PrvJbl m 1 51223-0 v,170 m,lm I,x91 Ie.10 xx,9M 19.48E r. M.1.1 It.opA.T. 2.500.00 rvnvler t. erolecte blo. (930.139) b.al . Awl .! blecuLe T... t0 Mass IWlteto! l Ntno9enlc Xleraol0enlse In T-,W Y/Y mi psaj t XO-91-01 S83xe-0 133,91. 106.03E 10],.]] (.w.:3 ColleNralN Ntnl 9tWI pelne Xelam4e TNh 1. Ntst MrtLLu. A vlrue A 9ltulmce Fecbt A— 1. I. W11. MI PmJ X1-93-06 59339-0 690.021 (x1.9.11 Ix].9611 33.961 SO -TOTAL- SMC.AL MATTOTa 18.961.51E 2.851.000 11H MI NS.U6 2.020.157 x,109.661 3. g9.Nee.. .... .9.M.M 3.500.000 x36.55. I.e9.pp (I,6JO.b1' 308,E+9 1,811.233 lot- ..I - IMAT w... .11.1 Bm I,xM.11].SM BO.M0,000 123.643,917 35.321.0]9 13.353.809) I56.111.]01 63,]Of,9e1 WX91B9CTIOX .X ...[99 CdIPLMAO ,83 11 B/]0/9f ...M. 6 s10.5.. 401.061 (6051 E15.699 (601.m11 TOTAL JOINT wb9 CAPITAL M9VIRAM"S 1.306.11J.SR 60.P]0,000 1x1.164.6M 35,+23.0n3 I1.9]9.N01 IL.9696Fp9 11.901.9]1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 14 1 OB9J ELLIS AVENUE PO.FOX 9129 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92729 9127 May 26, 1993 914)962-2411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE/FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEES Meeting Date: May 26, 1993 - 5:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: Present: Present: William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Evelyn Hart Vice Joint Chairman James V. Evans A. B. "Buck" Catlin Past Joint Chairman Don R. Griffin Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman John M. Gullixson Robert Richardson Chairman, District 1 Evelyn Hart John Collins Chairman, District 2 Iry Pickler Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 Peer Swan John C. Cox, Jr. Chairman, District 5 James A. Wahner James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Grace Winchell Charles E. Puckett Chairman, District 7 Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Staff Present: John M. Gullixson Chairman, District 13 Peer Swan Chairman, District 14 Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Roger Stanton County Supervisor Blake Anderson, Director of William Steiner County Supervisor Technical Services Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Others Present: Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Director Eva Miner Gary Streed, Director of Finance Director Maria Moreno Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel Maintenance Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations Patti Gorczyca, Finance Manager Ed Torres, Air Quality Manager 1) Fiscal Policy Committee Recommendations. Director Wahner, who acted as Chair in the absence of Chairman Puckett at the May 19th meeting of the Fiscal Policy Committee, reported that the Committee had reviewed and considered several items of business and recommended the following actions which are summarized below and detailed in the Fiscal Policy Committee's report. Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 26, 1993 A. All-Risk. Earthquake and Flood Prooerty Insurance. Last year the Boards approved property insurance with coverage of $200 million all-risk; $100 million In earthquake and flood; plus $100 million boiler and machinery including earthquake resultant damage. The overall property risk management program is supplemented by the Districts' cash insurance reserves, currently estimated at $185 million; and, heretofore, an assumption of eligibility for recovery of up to $100 million in damages from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The basis for the above described property risk management program was an estimated plant and equipment (Districts' sewerage facilities) exposure value of $840 million, which includes the two treatment plants, outfall disposal facilities and 29 outlying pump stations. A comprehensive evaluation of the Districts' sewerage facilities has been conducted and their replacement value has now been estimated at $1 .3 billion. It does not include the trunk sewers. The increased property valuation exposure, plus a tightening (hard) insurance market that has increased renewal premiums 15-20% recently and that is expected to worsen due to huge catastrophic property losses of recent years, lie., hurricanes, storms, earthquakes, riots and bombings) and increase premiums another 20% after July list for our existing coverage, and even double or triple over the next few years, will have a major impact on our insurance costs. Therefore, the Districts' broker, Robert F. Driver Associates, and the Risk Management Task Force are recommending that the existing all-risk insurance policy which expires July list be cancelled and rewritten as soon as possible, based on the coverage levels deemed appropriate,to minimize the premium hit on the Districts. It is believed that the change could be made retroactive to June 1, 1993 if the Directors grant approval at the regular June 9, 1993 Board meeting. It is also recommended that the combined property cash insurance reserve target level be increased from $100 million to $200 million (also see following liability insurance item). However,this can be accomplished through the annual budgetary and fee setting process that is reviewed and acted upon by the Boards each year. The currently estimated insurance reserve is $185 million. 2 Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 26, 1993 Recommendation The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation, as follows: (1) Approve the recommended Proposal 1A all-risk property insurance program, summarized below: PROPERTY INSURANCE PROGRAM EXISTING RECOMMENDED 1711192-7193) (6/1193-6/1194) All Risk Including All Risk Including Terms Earthquake and Flood Earthquake and Flood Company Layered Program Layered Program Coverage Manuscript Manuscript All Risk Form All Risk Form $200,000,000 All Risk $200,000,000 All Risk $100,000,000 Earthquake $100,000,000 Earthquake $20,000,000 Deductible Cap 5% Deductible Premium $647,340 $1,000,000 to $1.100,000 (Including taxes and fees) (Including taxes and fees) (2) Authorize staff to direct Robert F. Driver Associates to place the Districts' all risk, earthquake and flood property insurance program within the above indicated parameters to the lowest cost and acceptable carriers. B. Continuing Policy of Self-Funding Liability Risk. Several years ago, during a period when insurance premiums for liability coverage skyrocketed, the Boards opted to self-fund the Districts' liability risk exposure. As part of that decision the Boards directed that an in-lieu premium in the approximate amount of $260,000 (the Districts' then annual liability insurance premium) prior to the rate increases, be deposited each year to build the self-funded liability account insurance reserves. The Boards also directed that the self-funding policy be reviewed annually. 3 Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 26, 1993 �..i The Districts' broker, Robert F. Driver Associates, and the Risk Management Task Force have reviewed the insurance market and considered the existing policy and possibly viable alternatives. It is recommended that the current policy of self-funding liability risk exposure be continued. It is also recommended that the property and liability cash insurance reserve target level be increased from $100 million to $200 million (also see preceding property insurance item). However, this can be accomplished through the annual budgetary and fee setting process that is reviewed and acted upon by the Boards each year. The currently estimated insurance reserve $185 million. Recommendation The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation to reaffirm the existing policy of self-funding liability risk, and to direct staff to target a combined insurance reserve addressing both property and liability exposures to achieve a $200 million target funding level, subject to annual budgetary and fee policy determinations by the Boards. C. 1993-94 Joint Works Budget Recommendations. Fiscal Policy Committee Chairman Wahner reported that the Committee had met several times over the past few months to consider the 1993-94 Joint Works Budgets. He said that the Committee recommended approval of the Budgets contained in the enclosed booklet. Staff was then asked to review the budgetary recommendations. The General Manager observed that due to the current economic conditions, virtually every governmental agency in the county, state and nation is continuing to experience severe fiscal problems. The Sanitation Districts are in better financial condition than most, but, nonetheless, staff is extremely sensitive to the current situation. Accordingly, he had previously - recommended, and the Directors had agreed, to propose hold-the-line budgets for 1993-94 with no Districts' fee increases; notwithstanding that over $300 million in new facilities had been placed into service over the last three years and that the Districts continue to face new and increasingly stringent environmental laws and regulations. This means that some projects and programs will have to be delayed, scaled back or eliminated. Because of the current service demands, this will principally impact the capital program. One area that we cannot cut back is 4 Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 26, 1993 work related to Operations, Maintenance and Replacement(OM&R) and system reliability. To do so would jeopardize the integrity of our system and our ability to protect public health and the environment. Although we are currently bringing expansive new facilities on line, staff believes we can get by in 1993-1994, partially due to certain changes in operations and by reorganizing some activities. The wastewater management program requirements will be reviewed next year when the 1994-95 budgets are prepared, in the context of conditions at that time. With assistance and direction from the Fiscal Policy Committee, the Joint Works budget recommendations for 1993-94 have been prepared for the Directors' consideration, reflecting a decrease of 59.7 million from 1992-93, on top of the $34.9 million decrease from 1991-92 to 1992-93, as follows: Approved Approved Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Joint Operating Fund S 50,031,000 $ 48,648,000 $ 49,579,000 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 114,151,000 80,630,000 70,032,000 Total $164.151.000 $129.278.000 $719.611,000 Percent (Decrease) From 1991-92 JIL2 061 27.10 Percent (Decrease) From 1992.93 17'5%1 The Director of Finance then reviewed the major elements of the 1993-94 Joint Works Budget recommendations, as follows: 1. Personnel Recommendations (bluel: A net decrease of one staff position will continue to provide for operating, maintaining and administering the Joint Works activities and facilities in accordance with the "2020 VISION" Master Plan, and to support related activities and programs to comply with changing regulatory requirements. The goal of the Personnel Recommendations was to hold-the-line with regard to staffing. Combined with some minor organizational changes, these recommendations go a little farther and propose a net reduction of one position with a net savings of $42,732. 5 Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 26, 1993 �. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED 1993-94 STAFFING CHANGES Annual Positions Increase Program/System Add (Delete) (Decrease) Finance Purchasing/Warehousing -0- $(11,508) Operations and Maintenance Technical Support (1) $( 9,324) Operations & Maintenance 2 102,852 Technical Services Conservation/Reclamation/Recycle (1) $(59,040) Regulatory Compliance (1) (65,712) TOTAL CHANGES (1) $(42,732) The proposed staffing changes would reducethe authorized staffing level to 664 from 665. The total gross payroll costs for 1993-94 are projected to be $36.4 million, including all benefits. No appropriations have been made for the meet-and-confer process required when our existing three- year MOUs expire around the end of the calendar year. After labor charge-outs for joint capital improvement projects (CORF), District capital improvement projects, and District facilities maintenance, the net Joint Operating payroll and benefits account for 53% of the total Joint Operating fund budget. 2. Joint Ooeratina Fund (green): The net cost to administer the Joint Districts' activities and to operate and maintain the Joint Works Treatment Facilities for 1993-94, including the personnel 6 Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 26, 1993 recommendations, is budgeted to be $49.6 million. Despite programmatic changes amounting to $1 .3 million, the proposed budget reflects an increase of only $931,000 from 1992-93 and remains below the approved budget for 1991-92. 3. Self-Funded Insurance: Included in the Joint Operating Budget, the following self-funded insurance budgets are consistent with the Boards' past actions relative to these plans: a. Workers' Compensation (pink) $322,000 b. Self-Funded Health Plan (goldenrod) $3,594,000 C. Liability (salmon) $222,000 4. CORF Joint Works Construction (yellow): The CORF (Capital Outlay Revolving Fund) budget sets forth a $70 million treatment plant expansion and improvement construction program for 1993-94 in accordance with the 30-year Master Plan adopted by the Boards in 1989. Recommendation The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation that the following actions be taken on the 1993-94 Joint Works budgets: (1) Approve personnel recommendations deleting one position and making minor organizational modifications at an estimated net annual salary savings of $42,732. (2) Approve Joint Operating Budget to fund operations, maintenance and administrative activities in the net total amount of $49,579,000, including the following self-funded insurance programs: la) Workers' Compensation $ 322,000 (b) Health Plan $3,594,000 (c) Public Liability $ 222,000 (3) Approve Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget to fund treatment plant expansion and improvements in the total amount of $70,032,000. 7 Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 26, 1993 D. Fixed to Floating Interest Rate Swap (1993 SWAP) At the regular April Board meeting, the Directors authorized preliminary work to proceed on structuring a fixed-to-floating interest rate SWAP (1993 SWAP), subject to final authorization to conduct the transaction by the Boards. The estimated annual earnings from this transaction range between $1 and $4 million. The Directors also authorized requests for proposals from Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber, the underwriting team, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, special bond counsel,and Rourke,Woodruff and Spradlin,co-counsel, for the Directors' consideration. Recommendation The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommended actions, as follows: (1) Approve letter agreement with Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber dated May 13, 1993 (enclosed with Fiscal Policy Committee Report [lavender]), for underwriting services, whereby Merrill Lynch will receive a spread not to exceed 10 basis points, and will pay to PaineWebber the lesser of the present value of five basis points or one-half of the total spread per annum from the net spread received by Merrill Lynch. The total spread will be negotiated by staff just prior to the SWAP transaction based on current market comparables and will be disclosed in full to the Districts prior to final pricing. (Assuming a $100 million SWAP with five-year maturity, 7% present value, semiannual payment, and a 10 basis point spread, the total fee would be about $415,830 to be split equally between Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber.) (2) Approve letter agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe dated May 12, 1993 (enclosed with Fiscal Policy Committee Report [pink]), for special bond counsel services, for a fee not to exceed $15,000. (3) Approve letter agreement with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin dated May 12, 1993, (enclosed with Fiscal Policy Committee Report [buff]) for co-counsel services pursuant to their existing contract with the Districts, for a total cost of services not to exceed $5,000. Director Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on these items be made a matter of record. 8 Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 26, 1993 E. Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation. 1993 Series 1. At the April Joint Board meeting, the Directors authorized preliminary work to proceed on structuring the Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series 1, subject to final authorization to conduct the transaction by the Boards, and once a targeted 3% savings level is achieved. The transaction would yield at least a $2.5 million interest cost savings once the targeted 3% savings level is realized. The Directors also authorized requests for proposals from Merrill Lynch,the underwriter, Orrick, Herrington &Sutcliffe, special bond counsel, and Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, co-counsel, for the Directors' consideration. Recommendation The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommended actions, as follows: (1) Approve letter agreement with Merrill Lynch dated May 13, 1993 (enclosed with Fiscal Policy Committee Report [salmon]), for underwriter services at a rate of $8.50 per $1,000 certificate for a traditional fixed (with or without inverse floaters) advance refunding, and $3.50 per $1,000 certificate fora synthetic fixed rate advance refunding structure. (2) Approve letter agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe dated May 12, 1993 (enclosed with Fiscal Policy Committee Report [pink]), for special bond counsel services, at a not-to-exceed $60,000 fee, plus expenses, for a traditional fixed (with or without inverse floaters) advance refunding, and a not-to-exceed $85,000 fee, plus expenses, for a synthetic fixed advance refunding structure. (3) Approve letter agreement with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin dated May 12, 1993 (enclosed with Fiscal Policy Committee Report [gold]), for co-counsel services pursuant to their existing contract with the Districts at a total cost not to exceed $5,000. Director Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on these items be made a matter of record. 9 Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 26, 1993 �. F. Request of Mudge Rose for Reconsideration of Fees for Refunding COPS, 1992 Series. At the April Joint Board meeting, after lengthy discussion, the Directors voted to deny a billing adjustment to Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. Because the Executive Committee had recommended an adjustment of $40,000to the Joint Boards, Mr. Long of Mudge Rose did not attend the Board meeting and, thus, did not present his case to the full Boards. Mr. Long has, therefore, requested reconsideration and that he be allowed to appear before the Directors to present his case (goldenrod copy enclosed with Fiscal Policy Committee Report). The Fiscal Policy Committee reported that it had discussed the request for reconsideration but took no action. During the discussion it was pointed out that anyone could attend the Board meeting and request to be heard. The Executive Committee, likewise, took no action. 2) Pr000sed Amendment No. 2 to Emolovee Commuter Program to Comply with SCAQMD Regulation XV. In 1989 the Directors approved an Employee Commuter Program to comply with the SCAQMD's rideshare Regulation XV. In 1990 the Boards amended the program to add incentives and a van pool trial to achieve the Regulation XV 1.5 AVR goal. Enclosed is a separate staff report (pink) evaluating the success of the van pool trial and recommending that the Boards approve Amendment No. 2 to the Districts' Employee Commuter Program to Comply with SCAQMD Regulation XV, increasing the authorized van pools from two to a maximum of five. The estimated annualized cost of the three added vans is approximately $12,000 per year. The ridesharing employees pay the operating and maintenance costs of the vans. 10 ` Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' Report May 26, 1993 Recommendation The Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy Committee concurred with the staff that Amendment No. 2 to the Districts' Employee Commuter Program be approved; and that authorization be granted to staff to purchase up to three new rideshare vans for an amount not to exceed $78,000 plus taxes and delivery. Director Gullixson requested that this vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. 3) Air Quality Issues. Enclosed are the following staff reports pertaining to evolving air quality issues: • Overview of New Operating Permit Program Pursuant to the 1990 Federal Clean Air Act (ivory). • SCAQMD Air Toxic Rules 1401 and 1402 (green tint). • SCAQMD RECLAIM Program (gray). The first two reports are informational status reports only. Mr. Ed Torres, the Districts' Air Quality Manager, reviewed the SCAQMD RECLAIM Program report utilizing the enclosed outline (gold) and recommended that the Joint Chairman send a letter to the Air Quality Management District Board requesting a delay in RECLAIM rulemaking until issues pertaining to availability of free Emission Reduction Credits (ERCs) for essential public services and small businesses are resolved. The Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy Committee concurred with the staff's recommendation and the Joint Chairman has sent the letter. 4) Proposed Change Order No. 2to Contract with Cooper Industries for Purchase of Spark-ionited Enaines for Use in Central Power Generation Systems. Job No. J-19A. The Districts' Director of Engineering reviewed the enclosed separate staff report (tan) recommending Change Order No. 2 to the J-19A Central Power Generating System engine contract, mostly for purchase of long-lead time spare parts and equipment, in the net amount of $333,149.82, plus tax and delivery, to have adequate on-site inventory for needed system maintenance and repair and recommended approval. 11 Executive/Fiscal Policy - Committees' Report May 26, 1993 Recommendation The Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy Committee concurs with staff's recommendation to approve Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A,authorizing a net addition of $333,149.82 plus tax and freight to the Contract with Cooper Industries. 5) Status Report Re Central Power Generation System Proiects. Staff provided the Committee with a verbal status report on progress towards completion of the Central Power Generation System projects at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. JWS:sc Enclosures wpdec\pm\uac83\06Y683.ean 12 r COUNTY SANITATION )JISTnn May 19, 1993 of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA • 10SA4 ELL19 AVENUE a o.90 x el2o FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFIN NIA 92729-9127 w� REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE m41992.2411 Meeting Date: May 19, 1993 FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: James V. Evans Alan Watts, General Counsel's Office Don Griffin Diana Sutton, Robert F. Driver Associates Evelyn Hart Don McLean, Robert F. Driver Associates Iry Pickler Peer Swan STAFF PRESENT James Wahner Grace Winchell J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance ABSENT: Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of John Gullixson Maintenance Robert J. Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager Margie Nellor, Source Control Manager 1. ALL RISK, EARTHQUAKE AND FLOOD PROPERTY INSURANCE. Last year, Districts' staff and Robert F. Driver Associates presented a report to the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committees detailing the specifications for the Districts' property insurance marketing. The report described the coverages to be included, limits of liability, deductibles, total insured value, loss control summaries, loss expectancies for all risk including earthquake and flood, and probable maximum flood and earthquake losses. The Committees also reviewed a detailed report which included the results of the insurance marketing efforts and presented final proposals and a recommended property risk management program supported by the Districts' Risk Management Task Force and Robert F. Driver Associates. The recommended program included a four-part earthquake recovery program of: 1) $200 million all risk and $100 million earthquake and flood insurance, 2) $100 million boiler and machinery insurance, including earthquake resultant damage, 3) an estimated $100 million Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) recovery, and 4) the Districts' $100 million insurance reserve. This four-part program was designed to protect the Districts from property loss exposure from all risk, earthquake and flood estimated to total $840 million in May 1992. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 2 May 19, 1993 Staff advised the Committee that since last year, the property and earthquake market has tightened dramatically due to extremely large catastrophic property losses of the last three years (i.e., earthquakes, hurricanes, storms, riots and bombings) and low interest rates. Recently, Robert F. Driver Associates has worked closely with staff to prepare a very comprehensive valuation of Districts' properties. The combination of market tightening and property value increases make replacing our currently valued $1.3 billion plant and equipment investment more costly. In recent renewal negotiations on behalf of clients, Robert F. Driver Associates has seen premium increases of 15% to 25% with some coverage restrictions. This trend is expected to worsen after July 1 as many expiring catastrophic reinsurance contracts are renewed on July 1, 1993. After July 1, Robert F. Driver Associates anticipate a loss of earthquake capacity of up to 25% and additional premium increases of up to 20%, or $250,000. During the next two years, Robert F. Driver Associates expect conditions to continue to deteriorate with rates doubling and tripling, along with increasingly diminished capacity and restrictive policy terms. Staff further reported that for these reasons, the Risk Management Task Force and Robert F. Driver Associates recommend the cancellation and rewrite of the CSDOC property insurance program as soon as oossible, with a target effective date of June 1, 1993, subject to approval by the Joint Boards on June 9, 1993. The long-term goal is to shift the renewal date of this program to March 1. In December of 1993, staff and the consultants will survey the market conditions to determine the advantages of making this change on March 1. The Committee reviewed a bound report including an executive summary, summary of market conditions and appraisal results, the Districts' all risk, earthquake and flood insurance history, the Districts' property exposure analysis, the results of marketing efforts, the current costs to replace our existing insurance program and two insurance alternatives. The executive summary and proposals are enclosed (blue). Proposal 1 includes a $100 million earthquake limit, and Proposal 2 includes a $75 million earthquake limit with 5% (A) or 10% (B) deductibles. The report recommends that the Districts renew the current program (Proposal 1A) and grow our targeted insurance reserves from $100 million to $200 million. This insurance reserves funding level is achievable through the normal budgeting process. The insurance reserves are estimated to be $185 million at June 30, 1993 on the enclosed Reserves Balance Analysis reports submitted to the Directors last month (tan). (Please refer to Catastrophic Liability Risk Analysis and Marketing Executive Summary, Item 2, for similar recommendation for the reserve level.) a• Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 3 May 19, 1993 Recommended Actions A. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends Proposal 11A; that the Districts purchase the same property coverage at this time as under the existing program, except for the deductible cap as follows: PROPERTY INSURANCE PROGRAM EXISTING (711/92.7/1193)' RECOMMENDED (611 19 3-6/i/94) All Risk Including All Risk Including Terms Earthquake and Flood Earthquake and Flood Company Layered Program Layered Program Coverage Manuscript Manuscript All Risk Form All Risk Form $200,000,000 All Risk $200,000,000 All Risk $100,000,000 Earthquake $100,000,000 Earthquake $20,000,000 Deductible 5% Deductible Cap Premium $647,340 $1,000,000 to $1,100,000 (Including taxes and fees) llncluding taxes and fees) The early cancellation of the existing policy, the payment of a small cancellation penalty, and the return of prepaid premium, will net a refund of about $51,000 to the Districts. The increased reserve levels will be subject to annual fee and budgetary determinations by the Boards. B. The Committee further recommends that Robert F. Driver Associates be authorized to place the Districts' all risk, earthquake and flood property insurance program, effective June 1, 1993, within the above indicated parameters to lowest cost and acceptable carriers. 2. CATASTROPHIC LIABILITY RISK ANALYSIS AND MARKETING. At the November and January meetings, the Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed liability exposures and risk analyses, insurance purchase versus self-funding options, preliminary marketing results for catastrophic liability insurance, and recommended policy alternatives. At that time, the Committee directed staff further review and evaluate liability insurance Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 4 May 19, 1993 alternatives in the context of the developing budgets for FY 1993-94 and to survey other sanitary agencies to determine how they address their liability exposures. The Committee received the enclosed Catastrophic Liability Risk Analysis and Marketing Executive Summary Report which identifies three risk treatment alternatives: A. Current Policy Annually fund the existing self-funded liability reserves, (estimated to be $3.2 million at June 30, 1993). This policy has included an annual in- lieu premium/contribution of $260,000. Continue to rely on the existing insurance reserve for any future catastrophic liability and do not purchase catastrophic liability insurance. B. Current Policy and Insurance Purchase Purchase an insurance layer to a limit of $25 million in excess of a $2 million self insured retention at an estimated premium of $230,000; and continue to rely on the existing self-funded liability reserves (see A above). C. Increase Insurance Reserves Funding Levels Establish a new catastrophic liability reserve, or increase the existing insurance reserve. The existing self-funded liability reserve and/or total insurance reserves target would be increased from $100 million to a new $200 million target funding level. The insurance reserves are estimated to be $185 million at June 30, 1993. (Please refer to All Risk, Earthquake and Flood Property Insurance, Item 1, for similar recommendation and enclosures for the reserve level.) Recommended Actions The Committee recommends the reaffirmation of the existing policy of self- funding liability risk, and the annual increase of budgetary appropriations to fund a combined insurance reserve addressing both property and liability exposures to achieve a $200 million target funding level, subject to annual budgetary and fee policy determinations to be made by the Boards. i Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 5 May 19, 1993 3. NINE-MONTH 1992-93 BUDGET REVIEWS. The Committee received the enclosed summary statements of the Joint Works Operating Costs (JO [light green]), the Joint Works Capital Improvement Program (CORF [yellow]), and the costs of the workers' compensation (pink), public liability (salmon) and health plan (goldenrod) self-insurance funds for the first nine months of fiscal year 1992-93. With three-fourths of the year gone, 72.66% of the net joint operating budget has been expended. Net costs are up $2,805,147 or 8.62%, compared with the same period last year. This cost increase is primarily due to salary, benefit and MOU adjustments and additional health plan costs totaling $1,967,440; increased property insurance costs of $299,088; and additional natural gas and electrical power costs of $1,101,155. Some offsetting operational savings have been realized from decreases in chlorine and odor control chemical costs and reduced use of chemical coagulants. Increases in other categories make up the balance of net costs. At the same time, due to community conservation measures, the economic conditions and a wet winter, flows have increased 3.70%. Therefore, the net increase in costs has resulted in a $24.91 per million gallons increase in the unit cost to treat and dispose of sewage, to $550.28 per million gallons. Staff will review the reports in detail at the meeting. Joint Works construction projects for the first nine months are lower than originally scheduled, running at 44% of the 1992-93 budget or $35.7 million. We continue to receive excellent bids on new projects, reflecting the slow economy. Work is nearly complete on the $40 million project for six new digesters and gas handling facilities at Plant 1. Nearly $12 million of progress has been made on the new 120-inch interplant line and related facilities, a $27 million project. The central generation facilities at both plants are now nearly operational with $8.75 million of progress in the first nine months of 1992-93. 4. 1993-94 JOINT WORKS BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDING SELF- FUNDED INSURANCE. Over the past several months, the Committee has reviewed the staff recommendations for various portions of the Joint Works Budgets. In April, the Committee reviewed and approved the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) Budget in the amount of $70 million, a $10.6 million decrease from 1992-93. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 6 May 19, 1993 The personnel recommendations and corresponding organizational changes and tables were also reviewed and approved in April. One position was deleted and some reassignments were made for new or expanding programs or to more efficiently manage existing programs for a net savings of $42,732. These changes are included in the projections for 1993-94 in the enclosed Joint Operating Fund (JO) Budget (green). The Committee reviewed the Joint Operating/Self Insurance Budgets which form the remainder of the Joint Works Budget recommendations for 1993-94. The following table summarizes the total Joint Works budgets for operations and maintenance and capital improvements for the last two years and the proposals for 1993-94: Approved Approved Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Joint Operating Fund S 50,031,000 S 48,648,000 S 49,579,000 1 1 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 114,151,000 80,630,000 70,032,000 h•✓ Total 5764.151.000 3129.278.000 3119.611.000 Percent (Decrease) From 1991-92 121.2%1 127.1%1 Percent (Decrease) From 1992-93 7.5 ) Recommended Actions The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the Executive Committee approve the proposed Joint Operating Budget and forward the recommended 1993-94 Joint Works budget package to the Joint Boards for consideration. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 7 May 19, 1993 5. 1990-92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND INTEREST RATE MONITORING. The financing team continues to monitor the interest cost and investment earnings of the 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program, Series A, B and C Certificates of Participation (COP) issues and to provide periodic reports to the Directors. The Committee reviewed a staff report providing the details for the following summary: Total Net True COP Interest Interest Interest Interest ISSUE Paid Earned (Cost) Earnings (Cost) Earnings SERIES A $ 7,210,145 $11,312,363 $4,102,218 1.7199% SERIES 15,994,142 14,221,281 (1,772,861) (0.7925%) SERIES 1,476,245 2,083.454 607,209 4.0592% COMBINED $24.680.532 S27.617,096 $2.936.566 1.5_ 145°h Although we have borrowed approximately $316 million since late 1990, we have actually realized $2,936,566 interest earnings to date. 6. FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP 0993 SWAP), At the regular April Board meeting, the Directors authorized preliminary work to proceed on structuring a fixed-to-floating interest rate SWAP (1993 SWAP), subject to final authorization to conduct the transaction by the Boards. The estimated annual earnings from this transaction range between $1 and $4 million. Accordingly, the financing team, consisting of Districts' staff, Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber, have been working closely with both rating agencies, Standard and Poor's and Moody's, towards the development of a 1993 fixed-to-floating rate SWAP strategy. S&P is focusing on the Districts' strong financial management as evidenced by 10-year cash flows demonstrating moderate and increasing user fees commensurate with anticipated budget requirements, consistent and increasing cash reserves, and debt obligation coverages as required by our COP covenants. Moody's is also reviewing cash flow projections. i Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 8 May 19, 1993 The Directors also authorized requests for proposals from Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber, the underwriting team; and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, special bond counsel; and Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, co-counsel, for the Committee's consideration. The recommended actions are listed below: The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the following actions: A. Approve enclosed letter agreement with Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber dated May 13, 1993 (lavender), for underwriting services, whereby Merrill Lynch will receive a spread not to exceed 10 basis points, and will pay to PaineWebber the lesser of the present value of five basis points or one-half of the total spread per annum from the net spread received by Merrill Lynch. The total spread will be negotiated by staff just prior to the SWAP transaction based on current market comparables and will be disclosed in full to the Districts prior to final pricing. (Assuming a $100 million SWAP with five-year maturity, 7% present value, semiannual payment, and a 10 basis point spread, the total fee would be about $415,830 to be split equally between Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber.) B. Approve enclosed letter agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe dated May 12, 1993 (pink), for special bond counsel services, for a fee not to exceed $15,000. C. Approve enclosed letter agreement with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin dated May 12, 1993, (buff) for co-counsel services pursuant to their existing contract with the Districts, for a total cost of services not to exceed $5,000. 7. ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION. 1993 SERIES At the April Joint Board meeting, the Directors authorized preliminary work to proceed on structuring the Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series 1, subject to final authorization to conduct the transaction by the Boards, and once a targeted 3% savings level is achieved. The transaction would yield at least a $2.5 million interest cost savings once the targeted 3% savings level is realized. Staff reported that they and Merrill Lynch have been monitoring fluctuating municipal interest rates to determine when it would be advantageous to refund the remaining 1990-92 Series 8 COPs. The market had improved Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 9 May 19, 1993 somewhat since the last Fiscal Policy Committee meeting, but worsened in the past week. The market is between 47 and 80 basis points away from the 3% targeted savings level, as of May 19, 1993, depending on the advance refunding structure ( i.e., traditional versus synthetic fixed rate). Districts' staff, Merrill Lynch, the underwriter; Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, special bond counsel; and the underwriter's counsel will continue to monitor market performance and will proceed with preliminary steps to structure and bring to market the Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series 1, once the 3% savings level is realized. With regard to the State Revolving Fund, staff reported that they had received an opinion from the state's bond counsel indicating that any legal issues regarding the refinancing of a 1990-92 Series B term bond with State Revolving Fund (SRF) bonds could be resolved. The interest rate on the loan would be one-half of the state general obligation bond rate (currently less than 2%). However, when staff communicated with SRF staff on May 6, 1993, regarding the status of the loan they learned that it is now unlikely that the Districts will be able to receive a loan since the President's stimulus package has not been passed by the Congress. Apparently, the SRF staff was anticipating receiving an additional $80 million under the stimulus package. Those funds would have been the source for our loan. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the following: A. Approve enclosed letter agreement with Merrill Lynch dated May 7, 1993 (salmon), for underwriter services at a rate of $8.50 per $1,000 certificate for a traditional fixed (with or without inverse floaters) advance refunding, and $3.50 per $1,000 certificate for a synthetic fixed rate advance refunding structure. Enclosed, for comparative review, are two tables (stone) presenting underwriter's compensation (also referred to as gross spread or underwriter's discount) for all California traditional fixed and variable rate (including synthetic fixed rate) issues between $50 and $150 million par amount during 1992 through the current period. The gross spreads identified range from $4.55 to $15.00 per $1,000 certificate, with average fees ranging in the $8 to $11 per $1,000 certificates range for traditional fixed; and from $1.50 to $9.80 per $1,000 certificates, with average fees ranging in the $3.50 to $6 per $1,000 certificate range for variable rate transactions. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 10 May 19, 1993 B. Approve enclosed letter agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe dated May 12, 1993 (pink), for special bond counsel services, at a not-to-exceed $60,000 fee, plus expenses, for a traditional fixed (with or without inverse floaters) advance refunding, and a not-to-exceed $85,000 fee, plus expenses, for a synthetic fixed advance refunding structure. C. Approve letter agreement with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin dated May 12, 1993 (gold), for co-counsel services pursuant to their existing contract with the Districts at a total cost not to exceed $5,000. 8. REQUEST OF MUDGE ROSE FOR RECONSIDERATION OF FEES FOR REFUNDING COPS. 1992 SERIES. At the April Joint Board meeting, after lengthy discussion, the Directors voted to deny a billing adjustment to Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon, as recommended by the Fiscal Policy Committee. Because the Executive Committee had recommended an adjustment of $40,000 to the Joint Boards, Mr. Long of Mudge Rose did not attend the Board meeting. Mr. Long has, therefore, requested reconsideration and that he be allowed to appear before the Directors to present his case (goldenrod copy enclosed). The Committee discussed the request for reconsideration but took no action. During the discussion, it was pointed out that anyone could attend the Board meeting and ask to be heard. GGS:lc REF:J:\V 00C%FPC.WGWPC6-0B.93 Enclosures 1 ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOCIATES Division of Robert F.Driver Co..Inc. /ASSOCIATES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ALL RISK EARTHQUAKE AND FLOOD PROPERTY INSURANCE MARKETING REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY May 13, 1993 Robert F. Driver Associates 3636 BIRCH STREET.SUITE 230.NEWPORT BEACH. CAGFORNIA 92660-2619 (714)756-0271 • FAX(714)756-2713 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Property Insurance Market Conditions The insurance marketplace is subject to distinct cycles characterized by availability of insurance coverages at low rates and premiums (a "soft" market) or restricted availability of insurance coverage at significantly higher rates and premiums (a "hard" market). For the past six to eight years, insurance buyers have generally enjoyed increasing coverage capacity and decreasing rates. Market conditions began deteriorating in January of 1993 gaining increased momentum during the past two months as a result of the extremely large catastrophic property losses of the past three years (i.e., earthquakes, hurricanes, storms, riots and bombings) and low interest rates. In 1992, an industry record was set when aggregate losses totalled $23 billion. In recent renewal negotiations for our clients, we have seen increases of 15% to 25% with some coverage restrictions. We expect this trend to worsen after July 1 as the last "soft" market reinsurance contracts are renewed. During the next two years we expect conditions to continue to deteriorate with rates doubling and tripling, along with increasingly diminished capacity and restrictive policy terms. For these reasons, we are recommending the cancellation and rewrite of the CSDOC property insurance program as soon as possible. We are targeting an effective date of June 1, 1993. Our long term goal is to shift the renewal date of this program to March 1. In December of 1993 we will survey the market conditions to determine the advantages of making this change on March 1. Property Insurance Appraisal We recently completed the property insurance appraisal for CSDOC. Property values were severely understated to insurers in 1991/92. The total values reported were$560 million. After our physical inspection of the Districts' facilities we estimated values at$840 million. We used this estimate to analyze the property loss exposures facing the Districts and to market and develop a new property insurance program and reserve policy for 1992/93 policy year. During the past year we have worked with Districts' risk management and engineering staff to prepare the appraisal. The total insurable values for the Districts were appraised at $1,306,322,801. The results of this appraisal are summarized in a Summary of Appraisal Results section and a complete schedule of values is provided in the appendix. The increase in insurable values for the 1993/94 policy term is approximately 45%. A value increase of this magnitude during a hardening market necessarily results in substantially higher premiums as shown in the Market Results section of this report. 2 Federal Emergency Management Authority (FEMA) FEMA has been an integral pact of the Districts' Earthquake Recovery Plan and the basis of the property insurance reserve policy. During the past three years, due to all of the catastrophic natural disasters, we have had the opportunity to see this organization in action. FEMA monies from the Loma Preita Earthquake in 1989 and Hurricane Andrew in 1992 have been slow in coming to Public agencies. The County of Santa Clara with over $15,000,000 in earthquake damages has yet to receive any FEMA assistance. The availability of EEMA funds is dependent on the number of disasters in any one year or sequence of years and the political pressures facing the current administration. The Districts' operations are certainly essential and any funds available to assist the Districts operation of sewage handling and treatment facilities would be a priority for FEMA. We are concerned about the funds that will actually be available to the Districts in any one year if there are multiple catastrophic natural disasters. We feel it is important to rely on more than FEMA or any one source for earthquake recovery funds. Property Loss Exposures We have updated the maximum foreseeable loss studies provided in our report last year. The original exposure estimates were based on $840 million in insurable values. Our appraisal has caused us to increase our estimated loss exposures in every instance. We are aware that recently constructed facilities have been built to withstand a 7.3 magnitude earthquake. Additionally, seismic retrofit of the Districts major facilities will be completed over the next three years. Seismic design has proven to be effective in reduction of damage, loss of life and down time. However, in estimating loss potentials for CSDOC, we must view the high severity yet low probability from an earthquake occurring along the Newport-Inglewood fault at it's closest proximity to Plants I and ]I. In short, the potential for liquefaction, high ground acceleration (severe shaking) and tsunami contribute heavily to the large loss potentials in our projections. Marketing Approach and Results In summary, there are several major changes that have affected our marketing approach this year including: • Hardening Market Conditions • Values increased by 45% • Cogeneration Facilities On-Line • Higher property loss exposures • Status of FEMA now considered a diminished loss recovery mechanism. 3 `� Marketing Approach and Results (Continued) As a result, we have considered several options to the current property insurance program. These options are detailed under the Marketing Results section of this report. The most viable alternative to an "as is" renewal is for CSDOC to assume higher levels of risk in the form of a major deductible increase. Earthquake Recovery Program Modifications to the current Earthquake Recovery Program will need to be considered if any other option than an "as is" renewal is selected. We have provided a brief summary of the existing program and possible modifications in the Earthquake Recovery Program section of this report. The most significant impact to the program would be an increased Earthquake deductible. For comparison purposes we have provided a few examples of the different types of Earthquake losses and how the current 5% deductible and an increased 10% deductible would work: Loss Amount 5% Deductible 10%Deductible Worst Possible Case $64,050,000 $128,100,000 (All property sustaining damage) Maximum Probable Loss $41,250,000 $ 82,500,000 (Estimated $361,000,000 in damages) Normal Loss Expectancy $ 1,000,000 $ 2,000,000 (Estimated $10,000,000 in damages) Our Recommendation Given our understanding of current CSDOC fiscal policies and risk transfer philosophy and the realities of a transitioning market place, we recommend that the Districts implement a new insurance program effective June 1, 1993 at$200,000,000 limit of liability with a$100,000,000 earthquake and flood sublimit of liability subject to a 5% unit of value earthquake deductible (See Proposal IA) at $1,000,000 to $1,100,000. 05/06/93-CSDOCPRO.RRT �� 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA PROPERTY INSURANCE PROPOSAL PRESENT PROPOSAL PROPOSAL II INSURANCE COMPANY: layered Program Similar to Present Same as Proposal I See Attached Schedule REST'S GUIDE RATING: See Attached Schedule Similar to Present Same as Proposal I CALIFORNIA STATUS: See Attached Schedule Similar to Present Same as Proposal I POLICY TERM: July 12, 1992 to July 12, 1993 June 1, 1993 to June 1, 1994 Same as Proposal I COVERAGE: Manuscript All Risk Form Same as Present Same as Present (see attached) Including Earthquake and Flood covering Rcal Property and Personal Property of every description of an insurable nature located anywhere within the State of California including: • Real Property Same as Present Same as Present • Personal Property including Property of Others in Cam, Custody and Control • Business Interruption • Extra Expense • Valuable Papers • Property in Transit • Demolition& Increased cost of Construction • Accounts Receivable • fuss Adjusting Expense • Electronic Data Processing Media & Media Extra Expense 10 PRESENT PROPOSAL MPOSAI, II COVERAGE(Cant): • Underground Piping &7lmnels limited Same as Present Same as Present to onshe Plants I & 2 plus Interconnections between I & 2 • Ocean Omlfall • Rental Income • Vehicles & Commcmrs Equipment VALUATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS: • Repair or Replacement with no Same as present requirement to replace at same site • Research & Restoration of Valuable Records • Specific named Adjustor Masson Young Associates., Inc. • Time Element coverages on Actual Lass Sustained Basis 11� C6FSEMT PRO SAL-1PROPOSAL 11 LIMI'15: $200,O00,000 Same as Present Same as Present SIB-LIMIT: $100,000,(XW Per Ocorm:nce Annual Same as Pro>nnt 1) S75,OOO,0Iq Earthquake and Aggregate Earthquake and Flood Per Flood Occurrence and Annual Aggregate DEDUCTIBLES: 5% Per Unit of losutance Subject to A) 5% Per unit of insurance subject to A) Santo as Proposal 1 $250,000 Min./$20,000,0(*Max. $250,000 Minimum Earthquake, Earthquake $25,000 Flood& All Other $25,000 Flood and All Other Perils Perils B) 10% Per unit of insurance subject to B) Same as Proposal 1 $250,000 Minimum Earthquake, $250,000 Flood and All Other Perils '1'0TAL INSURABLE VALUES: $840,000,000 $1,306,322,801 Same as Proposal ) AVERAGE RATE: .0758 A) .0766- .0842 A) .072- .0766 (Per$100 of Insurvble B) .0689- .0766 B) .065 - .0689 Value) ANNUAL PREh11Uh1: $637,500 A) 81,000,00(I- $1,100,000 • A) $950.000-$1,000,000• 7,444 Taxes&Fees B) $900,000-$11000,000 • B) $850,000-$900,OnD- 225 Policy Fees $645.169 EARTDQUAKE AND $50,000,000 per occurrence and PI.00D LIMIT OPTION: annual aggregate Annual Premium: A) $810,000- $900.0f81 B) $720,000-S8(K),(81() Average Rate: A) .062 - .069 B) .055 - .061 • Plus Taxes and Fees M/N19J-Vuee V RaP9a.rap 12 r RESERVES BAIANCES ANALYSIS No Rate CbnOa Far 93.94 PROJECTED CASH FLOWS Nor Texas Cm.tmt At 92.93 Laval RMSEDa21.03 Fee 1992.93 1993m94 199695 199596 1996w97 1997 98 Me 99 19992000 2000m01 20D1,02 DISTRICT NO 1 16 Next Year'.Dry Paripd Fundirp Ratuiremente 4,176,000 5,129,000 5,222.O00 5,947,000 5,738,000 7.512,000 7,883,000 8.209,000 8,738,000 9.213,000 19 Camin9an,A....yet.20%ef Opr RRmti 1,044,000 1,074.000 1,176,000 1.285.000 1.407,000 1.540.000 1,080.000 1,847,000 2.023,000 2.216.000 20 Insurance Rnervo.-Operalin9 6.053.000 4,494000 4.221.000 3,011.000 3,455.000 3,403.0DO 4.O11.0DO 4,450,000 6.039,000 4,564,000 19 Deall Service Reserves M FuM Balance 91111.050 5.554.050 5.286650 8,058,850 8.228.000 8.226.000 6,220.000 6.226,000 8.126,000 6.226.000 45 Gpttl Ra.erve..Share of 1100.000,000 9.070.00O 9,81D.000 9,87D,000 9,810.000 9.810.000 9.910,000 9,870.000 9.010,000 9.810,000 9.010.000 48 EnvirmmenW Rp Rae.Sbre of 110,000,000 987.000 987,000 001.000 907,000 897,000 982.000 902.000 982.000 982,000 997,000 41 Insurance Rnervee Cepral 180,000 2.265,000 3.984.000 0,213.000 8.802,050 0,023.850 4,162,050 2478,250 1.013,450 1219.3501 95 Avvreprietod Rtoryo 32.027.650 29,375,650 31.309.050 34,041,650 37.485,650 35,585.850 34,835,050 34.152.250 33.490,450 32,856.650 DISTRICT NO 2 IS Next Year a Dry Perlad Froth,Rpuirrom9 12,990.000 15.439,000 10,018,000 18,615,000 20,754,000 23,014,000 24.311,000 25,020,000 27.161,000 26J81,000 19 Conlin9ancy Forever, 20%of Over Rpmte 3.496,000 3,634,000 4,020,000 4,394,000 4,746,000 5,196,000 5,581,000 0,221,000 B.82Q= 7,470,000 20 Inaurenee R.......Oporto., 21,525,OOD 23.091,000 25,380,000 25.242.000 23,001.000 MUD.= 19.131,000 191M9.000 20,804.000 23.311,000 19 Debt Service A...—.exi F.M Sao— 19,352,550 13.185.550 13,806.000 15.156.000 16.500.000 16.500.000 10,500.000 10.500.000 10.500.000 16.500,000 45 Capital Remove.,St,wo 01100,000.0OD 28,150,000 28,750,000 28,250,000 28.750.()0 28d51).O0() 28.150.000 20,750.000 20J50.000 20]50,000 28]50,000 45 Environmental Rp No.for.of 110.000,000 2.815.000 2,815.030 2.875.000 2,825.000 2.075.000 2,1175.000 2.815.000 2.075.000 2.035.000 2.075,000 41 I..urrlc. Rome—CNuuI 33J28.000 42,045.000 52.311.550 54.856,550 52.380.550 56,701.550 58.512.550 81.049.550 54.207,550 58.120,550 86 Apprppri.tM R.... 122.TO1,560 129,805,550 143.878,550 149.958.550 159.998.550 153.021,550 155.038.550 160.532.550 187,143.550 175.925,550 DISTRICT NO 3 18 Next Year a Dry Period F.Mirp RK..,.me 13.131.000 10,554,000 17.178. 0 18,900.000 21,709,000 24,414,000 25,675,OW 21.056.000 38,588.000 30,211,000 19 Contingency A..nvo,20%of Over 111.. 3.964,000 4,241,000 4.41 B4O00 4.514,000 4,892A00 5,348,000 5.848,000 11.390,000 8.991,000 7.656,000 20 Ineurance 27.900,000 29.828,000 33,892,000 35,O92.000 31.968,000 26,833,000 24,021,000 21.918.000 20.356.000 19.392.000 78 Debt Semiu R....—extol Fund BJ.n.. 20.618,500 12.273.500 13,830.500 15,285,000 17,035A00 11,035,000 11,035,000 11,035p00 I7,035,000 11,035.M 45 Capital R.....She.of 1100.00O000 31.070,000 31,070,000 31.879.DOD 31,970,000 31.01D.000 31,810,000 31,810.000 31.810.000 31.810.1100 31.810,000 40 EnwrenmenW For,Re.,Shra of 11 O.00r 3.181,000 3.181.000 3.181.000 3.181.000 3.181.000 3.101.000 3,101.000 3.182.000 3.181.000 3.181.000 47 Inonnce Roarvow-Ceptal 18,805,OOD 25A92.000 33.544.000 38,241,500 41.014.500 31.010.500 28.089.500 24.000.500 21,100.500 11,868,530 90 Appmpri.tad A....— 119,981,500 123.861,5M 131.510,500 145,159,500 151.735.500 140.297,600 136,131,500 132.058,500 129,220,500 127.220.500 CF 93B 2.%L6 I1:12AM 4127193 Page 2 RESERVES BALANCES ANALYSIS No Rate Change,For 93 94 PROJECTED CASH FLOWS Roprry Tans Constant At 92-93 Level REVISED 4.27,93 AEI 1992-93 1993-94 1994.95 1995�95 1996-97 1997-98 199999 19992000 2000-01 2001%03 DISTRICT NO 5 18 Next Yew'.Dr,Print Funding Requirements 2,022.000 2,320,000 2,526,000 2,038,000 3.111.00D 3.388,000 3.542,000 3,896,000 3.808.000 4,049.000 19 Contir,-,R........ 20%.1 Dow Rml. 468.000 470,000 516.000 559.000 007.000 859,000 216,000 772,000 845.000 919.000 20 Insurance Reurv..-OPeraling 9.414.000 10,490.000 11.510,00 11.914.000 11,949,000 11.524.00D 11.212.000 10,080,000 9.939,000 8.953.000 99 Debt Service Ranrv...M Fund 91nu 3.908.000 1.8011.000 2.031.000 2.2011.000 2.361.000 2.301.00D Z381,000 2.381.000 2.381.000 2,3111,000 45 COW Reserve..Share of$130,000.000 4,4140,&0 4,440.000 4,440.000 4,440,000 4,440.000 4,440A00 4.440.000 4,44D000 4,440.000 4,440,000 46 Endmnmeme Req Per,Share of 410,000,000 444,000 441.000 444.000 444.000 444,000 444,000 444,000 444,000 444,000 444.000 42 Insurance Reserve.—Capita 4,926,000 5,39O.000 7,041.000 9.580,000 10.250,000 9.308.000 0.517.000 9,092.000 6,831.000 5.933,000 90 Appropriated Reserves 25.220,000 20,410,000 28,507,000 31,981,000 33,182,000 32.204.000 31.352.00D 30,117,000 28.748.000 27.119.000 DISTRICT NO 0 18 Next Ywe.Dry Print Funding RerrokwasnH 2.011.000 2,192,000 2,533,000 3.121.000 3.527.000 3.995.000 4,180.000 4.402,000 4.055.000 4,915,000 19 ContinI Reserves,20%of Opr R4mt. 507,000 504.000 039.000 70D.000 202,000 840.000 020,000 1,008.000 1,106,000 1,211,000 20 In.uro4.Fee,smi.-Corning 6.062.000 7,290.000 11,121.01DO 7.928.500 7,823.500 1.204,500 9.150.500 7,408,500 2,92D.500 8.726.500 09 Debt Service Reserves.M Fund Bdence 2.980.600 1,805.000 2.224,000 2.199.000 2,474.000 2.400.000 2.400.000 2.400.000 2,400,000 2,400.000 45 Capital Reserves.Share of p 100.000.000 5,470,000 5,470.000 5,470,000 5.420.000 5.400.000 5.420.000 6,470.000 5,420,000 5.470.000 6,00,000 45 Envlrammurrbl Rao For,SM1era el 410,000,000 647,000 547.000 549,000 547.000 547,000 547,000 547,000 542.000 547.000 547,000 47 less .. Re,ervs. Clear (616.0001 217,000 1109111000 2.140.000 3,334.000 1092.4001 12,810,400) (6,001,400) 17.434.400) 19,323.400) 95 APpr,,,.I.d Ruarvs. 17,027.000 181105,600 20.030,600 22,156.100 23.943,100 19.754.100 12,821,10D 16,177,100 14.053.100 13.425,100 DISTRICT NO 18 Nest Yors.Dry P-orl FuneinO Re,ub.menn. 3,402,000 3,843,000 4,808,000 5.344.000 0,102,000 0.900.000 7,124.000 1,461,000 7.835.000 8.231.000 19 Contingenpv Reserves,20%of Dow Ramts 997.000 1.038.000 1.208.000 1.224,000 1,327.000 1,480.000 1,560.000 1.201,000 1.840,000 2.008.000 20 Insurance Re erves.-Operatin9 14.062,000 10,649,000 12,403.000 18,303,000 17,624,000 15.925.000 14.049,000 13.450,000 12.089.000 10.808.000 79 Debt Sor Reserve.and Fund Beane 1.900.350 3,459.350 4,101.350 6,136.350 4,893.350 4.170.000 4.120.000 4.100,000 4.170,000 4,120,000 45 Cepitd Reserves.Shre of$100,000.000 2.130.ODO 9,130.000 7,130.000 7,130,000 2,130,000 7,130,000 2.130.000 7,130,00D 7.130,000 7,130.000 48 Invirmmmltl RN W.,Sher.of 410,000,000 213,000 913.000 913.000 213,000 213,000 213,000 013.000 213,000 213.000 713.000 47 Insurance Pnervm-C.pltd 17218000 18028000 23318000 25480000 28074000 25948350 24702350 23892350 23.398.350 23.350,350 90 APpopriatM Reserves 45,493.350 62,701,350 57,790.360 63,310.350 60,913,350 62,274,350 00.314.350 58.517,350 57.193.350 53.410.350 CF_( .S 11:12 AM • ( ' • '� 412( Pepe 3 RESERVES BALANCES ANALYSIS No Rat.Chas For 93-94 PROJECTED CASH FLOWS Pros ery Taxes Constant At 92 83 Level REVISED 4 27 93 RN 1992-03 1993.94 199495 1995.96 199e4) 199798 1990 99 1999 2000 200001 2OO1-0x DESTNCT NO 11 10 Next Yew Dry Partial Funding Reguirinnfe 2,074,000 311311000 3,807.000 4,221,000 4,717.000 5,337.000 5.584.000 5.804.000 0.1)),000 e,504,0W 19 Conti,-,Reissues,20%of Opo Rents )]8,000 e0e,000 978,000 981,000 11028,00) 1.121.ODD 1.223,000 IA34,003 1450.000 I.SS0000 20 Insurance Reserves Operating 10.580.000 10.055.000 9J11.000 9,491.000 0.312.000 S,e48.W0 S,7?4,00D 9.305,000 10,224.000 11.5)).000 79 Debt Sava Reserves and Funk Balance 0.350,000 2.004.000 3.335.000 3.002,000 3.427.000 3.427.000 3.427.000 3A27,000 3,427.000 3.427.000 45 Capital Reserve.,Share of 4100.000,000 5.980,000 5,980.000 5,800,000 %980,0W 5.980.000 SISK 0 5,980,000 5.9801000 5.980.000 5.980.0,00 4e Envnoomnlal Reg flee,Slave of 110,OOODOO 599.000 590,000 598.000 598.000 598.000 598.000 598.000 599,OW 598,W0 590.000 47 Insurance Reaenusa-Cnite1 5,718.000 7,284.000 9,207,000 10,357,000 12,402,000 11,221,000 11.190,000 11.211,000 11.302,000 11,03.000 90 Appropriated Reserves 34,O84.WD 31,258,000 33.01e.00D 34,e30,000 37.464,00 3e,332,W0 30,)]O.00O 37J20.000 39.1e4,000 41.149.000 DISTRICT NO 13 10 Nest Yew's Or,Period Funding Rnuirassent. 318,OW 329,000 358,000 3811,000 418.W0 453.000 492,000 534,000 579.000 e29,000 19 Conlingenry Reserves,20%01 Dow RRnt. 127.000 131,800 142A00 154,200 1e7,000 181,2W 19e,e00 213.400 231,000 251,000 20 Insurance Resew-Opening 802.000 780,400 8OO.e00 926.000 909.000 I.043,800 1.012,400 977.e00 949.400 939,400 79 Debt Sevres Reserves ek Fund&Inca 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 C,w&l Rseeress.She.01 F100A00.0D0 e50,W0 050,000 OSO.WO 050,000 050.000 050.000 e501000 e50.000 050.000 550,000 40 EnvnnnnW Rp Res,Shoe o1 F10,000,000 05.000 e5,W0 eS,WO e5,OW 85,000 05,OW 051000 05,000 05.000 05,OW 47 Insurance Rna vs.-Ca Il ),B4J.000 e.]ex,aW 6.))].WO 4.031,OW JJ84,OW 3.41],WO ].025.000 3,058,000 4.782,000 0,321,000 90 Approprielad Reserves 9.085.000 8,724.000 7.651.000 0.015,000 0.073.000 51800,000 5.841,000 8.299.OW ).25),000 8,845,OW DISTRICT NO 14 IB Nest Year s On,Period Fund'ag Rquimm-fs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 COntinOnq Raaeruse, 20%ef Opar B9nM 256,000 2e1,000 282.000 305.000 33QWO 357.000 300,000 418,000 453,000 492,000 20 Insurance Resnvs. Oparatin9 414,000 591,000 058.000 011.000 432,000 308,W0 303,000 35e.000 379.O00 404,000 79 Debt Sevice Roves and Fund Bdnu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 Capital Nesevsa.Share of F100.000,O0(f 5.840,W0 5,840,000 5,840.000 5.840,000 5.840,000 5,840,000 5,840,000 5.040,000 5.040.0W 5,840.000 40 EnvvommenW that Rae.Shane of 210.0W.000 584,000 584,000 584.W0 584,000 504.000 584,000 884,000 584,000 58d.0W MM.DOO 47 Insurance Resenese C.14 3e0,000 352,0D0 059.000 0991OOD 809.000 815.000 902,000 892,000 985.000 1.085,000 98 Appropri.IW Reserves 7,454,000 7.028,0D0 8,023.000 8,039,OW 7,995,000 7.904.000 8,045.000 81090,000 0.241.000 8A05.004) CF 938 2.XL8 11:12 AM 4127M3 Pe9e 4 RESERVES BALANCES ANALYSIS Na Rate M,.F.93 94 PROJECTED CAM FIOVS Ropsry Twn Cmrtnt At 92-93 L aO REVISED 4.27-93 RN 1992.93 1993.94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997m98 1990#99 19990000 20 01 2WI-03 ALL NSTRCT SUMIMARY 18 Nen Year aO Per.F.M Rmq A, nle 41,375. 0 48.977. 0 53,215.000 59.582A80 67.130.000 75.Wl.K0 78.803,000 82.901,= 87819,W0 92.539,000 19 Cmi,Nee—. 20%ol Opew RAtttS 11,895,000 12,252.6W 13.494,4W 14,116.2W 15,291,000 16,221,2W 10,220,800 19.921,4W 21,226.SW 23,813,800 20 Imu4nce Ret.—.t teme, 98]03.000 IM.182.4W 111.582.BW 113.177.3W IW.559.500 94,863.3W 90.512.9W 86.W7.IW 02.289,9W B8.863.9W 79 Debt9 .-Resume Po Bonn 60,193.650 40,888.650 44.923.1W 49,053.6W 52.932.950 52.145.W0 52.145.1tW 52.145.W0 52.145. 0 52.145.000 45 Ce tel Re.—.5Ave 0191 W.000.000 IW.(X0.OW 1W.OW.000 lmcx)o.600 1W.000.00D 1W.000.WO iW.00D.OW IW.000.00D 1W.000.WO IW.000.cm 1W.000.WO 46 Eneirmnwnttl Rq Ree.BM1us o1 S 10,OW,000 IO,000,WO IO,OW.000 t0,00D,000 IO.000.WO 10.000.000 101000.(tW 10.cm.000 lo.".000 1D.000,WD 10,000,000 47 Imumca R......-0piW 88.820,W0 111,235,W0 135,934,550 150,188,WD 121,890,2W 144.340,050 136,010.M 130.616.250 126.274,450 124.165.650 98 ApgOgiettl Reeuoee 414.706.650 427,535.850 469.129.550 496.092.15D 523.790.150 493,159.350 486.504.550 483.672.750 485.116.950 491,327.150 414.786.650 422.535.6W 469.129AW 490.02,150 523.790.150 493.159.350 488,5W.5W 483,622.250 485.116.950 491,327.150 CF_( .S 11:12 AM _ 4127/93 Page 5 MS111WS BALANCES ANALYSIS NO Beta CBagee F.93-94 PROJECTED f W FLOWS RopAW Taxes CmFIFnt At 92h93 Level REVISED 4Q7-93 Bel 199293 1993094 1990.95 199596 199897 1997.98 19M99 1999 2000 20MOI 2001 02 PROJECTED SINGLE FANSLY USE FEES 22 1 03.24 83.24 95.00 115.00 140.00 160.00 120.00 125.00 180.00 195.00 22 2 21.52 71.52 30.00 93.00 8900 100.00 110.00 120.00 130.00 140.00 22 3 23.89 23.89 25.00 80.00 85.00 95.00 105.00 115.00 125.00 135.00 22 5 96.25 96.25 100.00 102.50 105.00 110.00 115.00 120.00 125.00 130.00 22 a 26.42 28,0 05.00 95.00 105.0D 115.00 130.00 145.00 150.00 175.00 22 ) 50.09 5D.09 50.09 52.50 55.00 52.50 80.00 82.50 02.50 23.5D 22 11 BQW 60.00 25.00 95.00 115.00 130.00 145.00 160.00 125.00 190A0 22 13 IOD.W 100.00 10250 105.00 107.50 110.00 102.50 105.00 1D2.50 110.00 22 WBOMW Ave 71.28 31.29 38.18 83.19 90.82 IOL35 110A0 119.68 13B.9B 130.27 MASTER PAN SINGLE FAMILY USE FEES 22.2 1 MOD MOD 100.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 195.00 200.00 225.00 22.2 2 50.00 25.00 Item 100.00 100.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 150.02 150.00 22.2 3 10000 100.00 100.00 12500 125.0D 125.00 125.00 125.00 200.00 200.00 22.2 5 100.00 100.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 MOO 150.00 ISOM 150.00 175.00 22.2 a 25.00 100.00 100.00 MOD 100.00 12500 125.00 150.00 125.00 125.00 22.2 2 50.00 50.00 50.00 95.00 25.00 75.00 75.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 22.2 11 150.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 125.00 200.00 22.2 13 90.00 95.00 95.00 100.00 105.00 110.00 110.00 115.00 120.00 130.00 WNOMBtl A- 82.92 90.48 91.22 112.58 112.84 121.85 143.28 150.54 130.02 124AB SFB Feed 92-93 Tevo Au Bietl 0v Fn 221 1 108.29 120.00 139.93 184.83 184.22 194.52 199.41 204.23 209.03 22.1 2 105.40 111.26 116.61 121.42 133.18 142.89 152.59 182.31 172,03 22.1 3 111.01 112.04 116.93 121.00 131.86 141.51 151.38 1SL22 131.00 22.1 5 185.65 196.65 190.03 192.93 197.42 201.92 208.42 211.03 215.58 22.1 6 110.12 110.56 120.48 130.42 148.34 183.25 120.18 193.12 208.03 22.1 2 91.23 81.21 83.58 88.02 68.45 90.80 93.24 98.08 102A2 22A 11 100.19 115.02 134.81 154.54 189.28 183.99 198.71 213.45 229.12 22.1 13 100.00 102.52 104.92 107.49 109.95 102.55 104.90 102.65 109.96 22.1 W"htW Ave 1W.95 111.22 116.63 125.95 136.43 145.58 154.35 183.42 122.46 CF 9313 2.ItLS 11:12AM 5f ! / (PROPOSED) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS'RESERVES POLICY Reserve Requirements: Revenues Existing Proposed Target Target Funding Funding Level Level (1) 12) Cash Flow $70M $70M Confingerwy $28M $28M Cash Flow Contingency Capital Environmental Insurance Capital Projects $loom 0f 00M Reserves 0.searwa Project* Requirements Reserves (50%of Opereone 120%of Operating (e100M FYMingi Is IOM Funding) MOOM Funding) Environmental s10M s10M Budget) Budgeq Rer uinment* Insurance $loom $200M Reserve* Fee Stabitizetion sOM BUM Fee Total Ross.. $308M 6408M Stabilization Fund (Unfunded) 111 Excludes Debt Serve Reserves and Debt Fund Balance Dollars. 121 The 870M and $28M figures are assumptions only, since each year's target is based on that year's total operating budget. This funding level will be achieved during the FV 96-97/FY97-98 time frame. RESERV2B.XLS y ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOCIATES aDiMsion ofRoberl F.Dnver Co..Inc. ASSOCIATES COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CATASTROPHIC RISK ANALYSIS AND MARKETING REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT May 13, 1993 Robert F. Driver Asodates 3636 BIRCH STREET,SUITE 230,NEWPORT BEACH.CALIFORNIA 92660.2619 (714)756-0271 • FAX17141756-2713 9 PURPOSE OF OUR REPORT .J The purpose of our report is to provide District's staff and Fiscal Policy Committee with updated information to assist in the development on a Fiscal Year 1993-1994 policy regarding the method of handling the Districts' liability exposures. BACKGROUND Since 1986, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County have elected to self-insure the automobile, general liability and errors and omissions exposures of the Districts. The self- funded program consists of a primary Liability Reserve with a balance of$3.2 million as of June 30, 1993 with excess funds available from the Property Insurance Reserve with a current balance of$188 million. We prepared two reports for Districts staff and Fiscal Policy Committee which included: • Exposure Identification and Risk Analysis associated with catastrophic liability exposures; • Self-funding analysis including funding model which indicated an annual funding level of $843,000 and a reserve limit of $100 million; • Liability insurance options at various limits, self-insured retentions and premiums with a recommended insurance purchase program to include a $25 million limit with $2 million self-insured retention for a premium of $230,000. A final policy decision was delayed until the budget deliberations for the 1993-1994 Fiscal Year so that availability of funds could be determined. STATUS OF OUR LIABILITY RECOMMENDATION In our fast report, we recommended that the Districts address the treatment of the catastrophic liability exposure with a three-pronged approach including each of the following: 1. Liability Reserve This reserve provides for normal loss expectancies (everyday clams) and retention of $2,000,000 for catastrophic loss expectancies (large claims). 2. Purchase an insurance layer to a limit of $25,000,000 excess of a $2,000,000 Retention for a prerhium of $230,000. 1 v 3. Establish a Catastrophic Liability Reserve. Recommended contribution is $500,000 initially to build the layer quickly, with a minimum recommended funding level of $350,000 and a funding goal of $100,000,000. There has been little change in exposures or the legal climate since our last report. Unlike the property insurance market, the costs for liability insurance have remained stable and affordable. The premium mentioned in the indication above and in subsequent recommendation is only an indication. With direction from the Districts, we will provide firm premiums and coverage terms. Several changes that might affect policy decision by the Districts Joint Boards are summarized below: • Increase in Liability Reserve from $2,500,000 to $3,200,000. • Increase in the Property Insurance Reserve from $100 million to $188 million with indications that the fund will increase to $215 million in 1993-1994 fiscal year. • Potential elimination of property tax revenues to the District. • The increase in All Risk, Earthquake and Flood Property Insurance premium \� given market tightening, and increased Districts insurance property values. These changes have influenced the Risk Management Task Force and have resulted in the following recommended policy direction. RISK TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES In consideration of the changes mentioned above, Districts Staff and Risk Management Task Force input, and the Fiscal Policy Committee's responses to our previous reports, we have developed the following risk treatment alternatives. I. Maintain Current Policy Continue to fund the Liability Reserve with $260,000 annually to build or rebuild the reserve as losses are paid to a limit of$3.2 million. Rely on Property Insurance Reserve for any catastrophic liability occurrence as well as any major property loss or otherwise uninsured loss (i.e. pollution) 2 1 II. Self-Fund and Insure Continue to fund the Liability Reserve with $260,000 annually. Purchase $25 million of Excess Liability Insurance for $230,000. III. Self Fund Only Continue to fund the Liability Reserve with $260,000 annually. Increase funding of Insurance Reserve to $200 million limit and continue to rely on the insurance reserve to fund both Property and Liability losses and uninsured losses. OUR RECOMMENDATION Although the Districts have not yet experienced a catastrophic liability loss, our analysis as well as our experience with other public entities, suggests that it is highly probably that the Districts will at some point experience a catastrophic loss. Based on the information analyzed and discussed, we recommend the Districts address the risk with alternative II or III. Alternative III, use of insurance reserves of$200 million may be the most viable approach for the Districts given today's financial conditions and resource limitations. The Districts' Risk Management Task Force recommends alternative III - Self-Fund Only. `.J 3 5/10'..a JOINT OPERATIC . LIND BUDGET REVIEW & SUMMARY \ COMPARISON OF BUDGETED & ACTUAL EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEAR TO DATE 1992.93 (A) (B) (C) (D) (EI IF) (G) Budget Expenditures Expenditures Increase % Increase % Budget Remaining 1992-93 through through or (Decrease) Expended Budget 3/31/93 3/31/92 (Decrease) 1. Net Salaries, Wages & Benefits $23,899,000 $17,839,304 $15,871,864 $1,967,440 12.40 % 74.64 % $6,059,696 2. Odor Control & Chemical Coagulants 4,480,000 2,177,084 2,427,134 (250,050) (10.30)% 48.60 % 2,302,916 3. Contractual Services 7,373,000 4,999,755 5,691,367 (691,612) (12.15)% 67.81 % 2,373,245 4. Professional Services 1,226,000 557,152 756,534 (199,382) (26.35)% 45.44 % 668,848 S. Equipment Charges. 235,000 137,892 154,850 (16,958) (10.95)% 58.68 % 97,108 6. Repair & Maintenance Materials & Services. 3,844,000 2,485,184 2,262,660 222,524 9.83 % 64.65 % 1,358,816 7. Research & Monitoring. 2,906,000 1,747,843 1,782,564 (34,721) (1.95)% 60.15 % 1,158,157 8. Utilities. 4,422,000 5,035,744 3,796,356 1,239,388 32.65 % 113.88 % (613,744) 9. Other Materials, Supplies & Outside Services. 3,763,000 2,574,938 2,690,647 (115,709) (4.30)% 68.43 % 1,188,062 10. Total Joint Operating Expenses $52,148,000 $37,554,896 $35,433,976 $2,120,920 5.99 % 72.02 % $14,593,104 11. Revenues & Offsets. (3,500,000) (2,207,137) (2,891,3641 684,227 (23.66)% 1 63.06 % 1 (1,292,863) 12. NET JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE $48,648,000 $35,347,759 $32,542,612 $2,805,147 8.62 % 72.66 % 1 $13,300,241 13. Gallonage Flow (MG) 85,503.01 64,235.92 61,942.25 2,293.67 3.70 % 75.13 % 21,267.09 14. Gallonage Flow (MGD) 234.25 '234.44 226.07 8.37 3.33 % 100.08 % 15. Gallonage Charge ($'s/MG) $568.96 $ii5o.2S $525.37 $24.91 4.74 % 96.72 % $18.68 FPCR393.XLS 10:44 AM 5I1093 PAGE 1 JOINT OPERATING FUND &WORKING CAPITAL FUND SUMMARY BUDGET REVIEW 9 MONTHS ENDED 3-31-93 A B C D E F G H EXP EXP %EXP INCR INCR BUDGET THRU BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING (DECR) 1DECRI DESCRIPTION 1991-92 3-31-92 1992-93 3.31-93 3-31-93 BUDGET 8 % SALARIES.WAGES.&BENEFITS 1 SALARIES&WAGES 23,996.000 18,469,611 27,043,000 20,335,511 75.20 6,707,489 1.865,900 10.10 2 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS: 3 RETIREMENT 3.513,OD0 2,246,474 3,050.000 1.403.716 46.02 1.646,284 (842,758) (37.51) 4 WORKERS COMP 180.000 131,538 226.000 164,423 73.08 60.577 32,885 25.00 5 UNEMPLOYMENT INS W." 28.164 65.000 46.643 71.76 18.357 18,479 65.61 6 GROUP INSURANCE 2,480.000 1,491.212 2,166,000 2.784,855 128.57 (618,855) 1,293,643 86.75 7 UNIFORM RENTAL 90,000 55.265 100,000 52,878 52.88 47,122 (2,387) (4.32) 8 TOTAL BENEFITS 6,273.000 3,952653 5,606,000 4,452,515 79.42 1.153,485 499,862 12.85 9 SALARIES,WAGES,&BENEFITS 30,269.000 22.422.264 32.649,000 24,788,026 75.92 7,860.974 2,365,762 WAS 10 W.O.SALARIES&BEN.ALLOC.: 11 DIRECT CHARGES-CORFIDIST (4,300,000) 13,163,771) (4,800.000) (3,789,977) 78.96 (1,010,023) (626,2061 19.79 12 COST ALLOC-CORFIDIST (3,600,000) 13,386.629) (3,950,000) (3,158,745) 79.97 (791,255) 227,884 (6.73) 13 W.O.SALARIES&BENEFITS (7,800 000) (6,550 400) 18,760.000) 16.948.7221 79.41 (1.801,278) (398,322) 6.08 14 /NET J.O.PAYROLL 22,469.000 15,871.864 23,899,000 17,839.304 74.64 6.059.698 1.967,440 12.40 v MATERIALS.SUPPLIES.&SERVICES 15 GASOLINE,DIESEL&OIL 260.000 137,635 225,000 117,391 62.17 107,609 120,2441 (14.71) 16 INSURANCE 600,000 455.112 1,190,000 754,200 63.38 435.800 299,088 65.72 17 MEMBERSHIPS 30,000 20,291 58,000 44,681 77.04 13,319 24,390 120.20 18 OFFICE EXPENSE-SUPPLIES 165.000 117,140 165,000 124,088 75.20 40,912 6,948 5.93 19 OFFICE EXPENSE-OTHER I10.000 76.792 110.000 79,306 72.10 30,694 2,514 3.27 20 OPERATING SUPPLIES: 21 CHLORINE&ODOR CONTROL 2.300.000 1,105,176 2,171,000 896,807 41.31 1.274,193 (208,369) (18.85) 22 SULFIDE CONTROL 890,000 181,709 680,000 129,589 19.63 530,411 152,120) (28.68) 23 CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 1,930,000 1.140,249 1.649.000 1,150.688 69.78 498,312 10,439 0.92 24 LAB CHEMICALS&SUPPLIES 294,000 393,953 400,000 396.529 99.13 3,471 2,576 0.65 25 TOOLS 115.000 88,158 125,000 51.619 41.30 73.381 136,5391 (41.45) 26 SOLV, PAINTS,&JAN.SUPPUE 170,000 109,772 190,000 107,922 56.80 82,078 (1,850) (1.69) 27 OTHER OPERATING SUPPLIES 2151000 178,049 250,000 197,520 79.01 52,480 18,871 10.56 28 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 29 GROUNDSKEEPING 100.000 38,009 SO,WO 49,942 62.43 30,058 11,933 31.40 30 OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES I60,000 64,168 175,000 50.663 28.95 124,337 (13,503) (21.04) 31 SOLIDS REMOVAL 5.800.000 4,624,426 6,110,000 4,269,460 69.88 1,840,532 (254.9581 (5.64) 32 OTHER WASTE DISPOSAL 250,000 71,468 100.000 34,983 34.98 65,017 (36,4851 151.05) 33 OXYGEN PLANT OPER&VICE 450,000 344,782 468,000 341,853 73.05 126,147 (2,9291 (0.85) 34 OTHER 750,000 648.516 440.000 252.846 57.47 187.154 (395.670) (51.01) 35 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: 36 GENL.SPEC,&LABOR COUNSEL 650.000 391,321 650.000 372,397 57.29 277.603 (18,9241 (4.84) 37 AUDIT&ACCOUNTING 53,000 36,890 56,000 69,750 124,55 (13.750) 32,860 89,08 ENGINEERING 75,000 225,316 150,000 2,439 1.63 147.56' (222,8771 198.921 OTHER 410,000 103,007 370,000 112,566 30.42 257,43, 9,559 9.28 FPC393.XLS-5I1093-10:52 AM 5110/93 PAGE 2 JOINT OPERATING FUND &WORKING CAPITAL FUND SUMMARY BUDGET REVIEW 9 MONTHS ENDED 3.31-93 A B S $ 1 F $L r EXP EXP %EXP INCR INCR BUDGET THRU BUDGET THRU THRU REMAINING (DECR) IDECR) DESCRIPTION 1991.92 3.31.92 1992-93 3.31-93 3.31-93 BUDGET 9 % 40 PRINTING&PUBLICATION: 41 REPR04N-HOUSE 150,000 124,638 165,000 139,066 84.28 26,934 14.428 11.58 42 PRINTING-OUTSIDE 100,000 47,779 110,000 48,888 44.44 81,112 1.109 2.32 43 PHOTO PROCESSING 30,000 25,419 35.000 25,481 72.80 9.619 62 0.24 44 NOTICES&ADS 110.000 70,381 100,000 21,693 21.69 78,307 (48,688) (69.181 45 RENTS&LEASES: 46 OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 120.000 62,353 110,000 61,136 55.58 48,864 (1,217) 0.95) 47 DISTRICT EQUIPMENT RENTAL 130,000 92,497 125,000 76,756 61.40 48,244 (15,741) (17.02) 48 REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE: 49 MATERIALS 3,700,000 2,108,793 3,500,000 2.228.671 63.68 1.271,329 119,878 6.68 50 CONTRACTS 250,000 153.867 344,000 266,513 74.57 87,487 102,646 66.71 51 RESEARCH&MONITORING: 52 ENVIRO MONITORING 1.970,000 1,428,088 1,946,000 1,413,789 72.65 532,211 (12,299) (0.86) 53 RESEARCH 11363,000 356,476 960,000 334,054 34.80 625,946 422,422) 16.29) 54 TRAVEL TRAINING&MEETINGS 210,000 144,719 250,000 109,815 43.93 140.18E (34,9041 (24.12) 55 UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS 2,000 12,789 10,000 26,911 269.11 (16,911) 14.122 11^ '2 56 UTILITIES: 57 DIESEL FOR GENERATORS 200,000 74,158 200,000 89,966 44.90 110,034 15,808 21.32 58 POWER 5,000,000 3,419,135 2,473,000 4,436,583 179.36 11,962,5831 1,018,448 29.73 59 NATURAL GAS 300,000 83,288 1,284,000 167,995 13.08 1,116,005 84,707 101.70 BD TELEPHONE 125,000 63,494 125,000 87,519 70.02 37,481 24,025 37.84 61 WATER 180,000 158,281 340,000 254,681 74.91 85,319 98,400 62.96 62 OTHER EXPENSES: 63 FREIGHT 45,000 25,864 45,000 37,513 83.36 7,487 11,649 45.04 64 GENERAL 350,000 361,600 450,000 SOO,700 111.27 (50,700) 139,100 38.47 65 AGMD OPERATING FEES 350,000 191,359 325,000 102,273 31.47 222,727 189,086) (46.55) 68 PRIOR YEARS EXPENSE 150,000 3,058 100,000 16,589 16.59 83,411 13,531 442.48 67 OTHER NON-OPER EXPENSE 60,000 50,354 60,000 36,188 60.31 23,812 (14,176) 428.15) 68 TOTAL MATLS,BUFF,&SERV 30,662,000 19,506,937 28,849,000 20,079,027 69.00 8,769,973 572,090 2.93 69 COST ALLOC-CORF&OTHER (600,000) 56,175 (600 000) (363,435) 60.57 (236,685) (419.610) (758.70) 70 NET J.O:MATLS,SUPP,&SERV. 30,062,000 18 562,112 28,249,000 19,715,592 69.79 8,533 408 153,480 0.78 71 TOTAL J.O.REQUIREMENTS 52,531,000 35,433.976 52,148000 37554,898 72.02 14.593.104 2,120,920 5.99 72 LESS: JOINT REVENUES (2,506,000) (2,898,218) 13,610,000) (2,247,839) 64.04 (1,262,161) 850,379 (22.44) 73 REVENUE ALLOC-CORF/DIST 6,000 0854 10000 40.702 407.02 (30,702) 33,848 493.84 74 LESS NET REVENUES (2,500,000) (2891364) (3500000) (2,207.137) 63.06 (1,292,8631 684,227 (23.66) 75 NET J.O. EXPENDITURES 50,031.000 32.542,612 48,648.000 35,347,759 72.86 13,300.241 2,806147 8.62 FPC393.XL5-5/10/93-10:52 AM 5110193 CSDOC JOINT OPERATING WORK ORDER SUMMARY 9 MONTHS ENDED 3131193 9 Months 9 Months 9 Months S % Ended Ended Ended INCRADECR) INCRI(DECR) Mar-91 Mar-92 Mar-93 FROM PR. YEAR FROM PR. YEAR COLL, DIVER. & INTERPLANT 120,359 109,948 87,316 122,632) (20.58%) HEADWORKS 1,105,627 1,265,143 1,160,737 (104,4061 (8.25%) PRIMARY TREATMENT 3,831,675 4,537,092 5,872,097 1,335,005 29.42% SECONDARY TREATMENT 2,141,744 2,532,758 2,687,593 154,835 6.11% SOLIDS HANDLING 5,304,776 6,492,409 6,434,920 (57,489) (0.89%) EFFLUENT CHLORINATION 150,016 135,862 132,665 (3,197) (2.35%) EFFLUENT DISPOSAL 941,693 716,402 918,659 202,257 28.23% SUPERVISORY CONTROL 1,390,938 1,227,029 1,549,747 322,718 26.30% UTILITY SYSTEMS 1,561,530 1,607,532 1,790,168 182,636 11.36% `J GENERAL PLANT COMPLEX 5,063,143 5,066,332 5,446,361 380,029 7.50% ODOR CONTROL 3,380,176 3,095,100 3,012,578 (82,522) (2.67%) GENERAL ENGINEERING 691,233 652,162 466,149 (186,013) (28.52%) INDUSTRIAL WASTE 504,598 308,122 556,255 248,133 80.53% LABORATORIES & RESEARCH 2,907,839 4,375,235 4,708,807 333,572 7.62% MOTOR POOL NET CHARGES 228,517 170,610 269,875 99,265 58.18% ELECTRIC CARTS 106,379 137,963 119,435 (18,528) (13.43%) PORTABLE EQUIPMENT 154,750 112,913 134,397 21,484 19.03% TOTAL J. O. EXPENSE 29,584,993 32,542,612 35,347,759 2,805,147 8.62% WOSU393.XLS-10:39 AM 11-May-93 WORKERS'COMPENSATION SELF-INSURED FUND BUDGET REVIEW QUARTERLY 9 MONTHS ENDED 3-31-93 A B C D E F G ACTUAL % EXPENDED REMAINING ACTUAL TO DATE 1992-93 THROUGH THROUGH 1992-93 THROUGH INCREASE FROM EXPENDITURES BUDGET 31-Mar-93 31-Mar-93 BUDGET 31-Mar-92 (DECREASE) 1-Jul-79 1 Salaries 10,000 0 0.00% 10.000 818 (818) 154.684 2 Claims 165,000 102,463 62.10% 62.537 120,327 (17,864) 1,458,654 3 Contractual Services 30,000 25,098 83.66% 4,902 21,790 3,308 165,512 4 Legal Services 5,000 0 0.00% 5,000 0 0 0 5 Professional Services 35.000 22.594 64.55% 12.406 24.059 (1,465) 234,002 6 Supplies&Other 12,000 1.022 8.52% 10.978 953 69 20.245 7 Sub Total 257,000 151,177 58.82% 105,823 167.947 (16.770) 2,033,097 8 Excess Loss Policy 60.000 31,768 52.95% 28,232 43.775 (12.007) 385.472 9 Total Expenditures 317.000 182,945 57.71% 134.055 211.722 (28.777) 2.418,569 REVENUES&RESERVES 10 In-Lieu Premiums 225,000 164,423 73.08% 60,577 131.539 32,884 1,946,511 11 Interest&Other 77.000 43,539 56.54% 33.461 44.759 (1,220) 880,167 Total Revenues 302,000 207.962 68.86% 94,038 176.298 31.664 2,826.678 13 Excess Revenue(Expense) (15,000) 25,017 (40,017) (35,424) 60.441 408,109 16 Beginning Reserves 606.000 633,092 685,251 17 Transfers 0 0 250.000 18 Ending Reserves 591.000 658.109 649.827 658.109 WC06393 xLs 11-May-93 SELF-FUNDED HEALTH PLAN BUDGET REVIEW QUARTERLY 9 MONTHS ENDED 3-31-93 v A B C 2 € F G ACTUAL %EXPENDED REMAINING ACTUAL TO DATE 1992-93 THROUGH THROUGH 1992-93 THROUGH INCREASE FROM EXPENDITURES BUDGET 31-Mar-93 31-Mar-93 BUDGET 31-Mar-92 (DECREASE) 1Jul-79 1 Claim-Medical 1.300.000 1.826.255 140.48% (526.256) 988,948 837,307 10,573,686 2 -Dental 277,OD0 276.150 99.69% 850 216,413 59,737 1.689,150 3 -Disability' 0 0 0 0 0 173,457 4 -Sub Total 1.577,000 2,102,405 133.32% (525,405) 1,205,361 897.044 12.436.293 5 Contractual Services 69.000 65,697 95.21% 3,303 53.970 11.727 456,438 6 Stop Loss Insurance 101.000 100.850 99.85% 150 1D9,757 (8,907) 845,580 7 Total Expenditures 1,747,D00 2.268,952 129.88% (521,952) 1,369,088 899r864 13,738,311 REVENUES& RESERVES 81n-Lieu Premiums-CSDOC 1,034,000 772,465 74.71% 261.535 607,069 185,396 7,078,030 9 -Employee 313,000 283,991 90.73% 29,009 202,486 81,606 1,494,149 10 -Sub Total 1,347.000 1,056,456 78.43% 290,544 809.554 248,902 8.572,179 11 Relmb from Stop Loss Insurance 0 131,739 (131,739) 245,306 (113,567) 715,324 ^? Supplemental CSDOC Funding 400,OOD 1,269,907 317.48% (869.907) 164,360 1,105,547 4,490,411 Other 0 1,226 (1,226) 4,434 (3,208) 149,650 �i 14 Total Revenues 1,747,000 2.459,328 140.77% (712,328) 1,223.654 1.235,674 73,927,584 15 Excess Revenue(Expense) 0 190,376 (190,376) (145,434) 335.810 189,253 16 Cash and Carry-Over Reserves 194,000 (1,123) 145677 17 Ending Reserves 194.000 189,253 243 189.253 'Disability insurance has been purchased rather than self-funded since December 1989 SFOB393XL5 11-May-93 PUBLIC LIABILITY SELF-INSURED FUND BUDGET REVIEW QUARTERLY 9 MONTHS ENDED 3-31-93 A B C D E F G ACTUAL %EXPENDED REMAINING ACTUAL TO DATE 1992-93 THROUGH THROUGH 1992-93 THROUGH INCREASE FROM EXPENDITURES BUDGET 31-Mar-93 31-Mar-93 BUDGET 31-Mar-92 (DECREASE) 1Jul-79 1 Salaries 1,000 0 0.00% 1,000 0 0 1.715 2 Claims 500,000 450.672 90.13% 49,328 4.492 446,180 837,837 3 Contractual Services 10,000 2,283 22.83% 7.717 6.398 (4,115) 74.597 4 Legal Services 200,000 216,574 108.29% (16.574) 392,082 (175.508) 1,065,923 5 Professional Services 10,000 3,424 34.24% 6,576 114,087 (110,663) 128.231 6 Supplies 8 Other 2.000 0 0.00% 2,000 0 0 0 7 Sub Total 723,000 672,953 93.08% 50,047 517,059 155,894 2.108,303 8 Excess Loss Policy 265,000 0 0.00% 265,000 0 0 405,217 9 Total Expenditures 988,000 672,953 68.11% 315,047 517,059 155,894 2,513,520 REVENUES RESERVES 10 In-Lieu Premiums 350,000 262,500 75.00% 87,500 193,500 69,000 2,454,009 11 Interest 8 Other 200,000 146,015 73.01% 53,985 151,493 (5,478) 1,453,579 12 Allocation to Other Funds 1,000 0 0.00% 1.000 0 0 123.929 Reimbursement from Insurances 0 1,229,800 (1,229,800) 139,645 1,090,155 1,382,249 lY Total Revenues 551,000 1,638,315 297.33% (1,087,315) 484,638 1,153,677 5,413,766 15 Excess Revenue(Expense) (437,000) 965,362 (1,402,362) (32,421) 997,783 2,900,246 16 Beginning Reserves 2,285,000 2.184.884 2,322,289 17 Transfers 0 0 250,000 18 Ending Reserves 1,948.000 3.150.246 2,289,868 3,150,246 'Districts Entirely Self-Insured for Liability Claims Since July 1986 vLowwAL3 CAPITAL OUTUT REVOLVING FUND GC81MLB S1 101" ROPER CONSTRUCTION OYU112MlNT5 P... I FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 9 IpNTHS RN06D 3/31,93 (1) (2) (3) (4) (S) (II) NOPN REVISED TOTAL RE"IRZ0 ACCMULATED CURRENT IRAP COPPLETED 305 PROJECT UN6YPEND2D ORDER PROJECT BST BMCBT COST OUTIAY TRANSFER TO COST not. 1992-93 1992-93 6 6130,92 TO 3/31113 FIRED ASSETS TO DATE 1 - ] 1. He, and Rebod6•ud N•2or Projects A. Sect...t ten Plant I 1. Nastebauler ble0 a Sample Stu P1-29-I/2/3 51942-A,3 85.000 55,000 2 2 55.000 2. Primary Clarifiers Nee. 6-I5. PI-33 53709-0 45,950.000 250,000 (3.802) 63,79E $9.990 186.209 3. Cue Handling Facilities, PI-01-I 53710-A 15,450,000 IS0,00a 73d.995 (633.119) 103,876 783.119 4. Digesters 11-16. PI-34-3 53719-C 11,10:,000 6*100,0..0 23,398,CI8 3.911.03, 27,304,451 2,508.963 S. R.b.b of Digesters 5 a 10. PI-3S-2 52044-A 3.4E .000 10.000 IS0 130 9,010 6. Secondary Tray Expansion to 80 NOS, P1-36 53717-0 41.000.000 1.500.000 3,039.346 153,006 3,192,35E 1,346.994 7. Primary Treatment 72 NCO Bxp.ntion. PI-37 53719-0 31.675.000 1.000,000 103.687 9,902 113,599 990.09E S. S...ritY L Land.r.ping. PI-38-1 5216E-F 1.725.000 1,000.000 47.423 17.99E 25,411 952.002 9. Nice. CONN. Priority Elements PI-38-2 5210E-0 71650.000 6.750,000 270,076 208,903 $58.981 6,461.017 10. Seismic Upgrading I Gtruct. Wort PI-44 52125-B 25,000.000 I,500,000 268,772 28,494 297,266 1,471.506 Transfer t0 Project Belo. (200.0001 (200,0001 PI-41 Rehab of Prim Clarifiers 3.4 a 5 52I99-A 2,038,200 200.000 9,041 9.041 190,959 it. "i.e. Hadlflcat50ns PI-38-6, 5 5210E-N.1 18.130,000 4.000.000 611,21S 94,042 505.257 3.905.950 Transfer to PrOj¢ta Pat- (300.000) (800,0001 Facility Hodit. . Safety UpRad.s. 11-40 52187-0 4,522,500 400,000 32,931 32.937 367.063 Elect P.mllly Hadife. I Safety Upgr.d.a at Plant 1.P1-60-I 52107-A 100.000 IDO,000 Boo Boo 99,140 Pw Hodifv . Safety Comrades at Plant 1, PI-40-2 52107-8 130.000 150.000 5,190 5.190 I44,810 Hier I. osvamente at Plant 1. P1-42 52212-0 150,000 150,000 6.011 B.O11 143,989 $.late g6m(lt of Non-Struetur. System.. 1I-41 52222-A 3.450,000 12. Belt Presses It Unite) 15.500.000 13. Digester.: 2 B 110- Diameter 9.100,000 It. Standby P .r Om.ration 41200.000 50,000 50,000 15. 12kr 91...rmel Peer Distribution 2.300.000 Is. Electrification Project 1,900,000 17. 6•rBanrr Bypae. 5,a00,000 10. Bxove Trickling Filters 1 13 1.000,000 IS. Cmtnl air Cwor....c Start.. 250,000 20. 40 "Do Oxygen Aetivetzd Sludge A DAN'. 70.000.000 21. Solids Storage (4 sins) 11.000.000 22. Mlac. Projects (See Schedule C) IO.ESa.000 1,000,GGO N.093 241.719 255,81E 758.281 23. Other Master Plan Projects a. Head.orks No. 1 Rebuild, 2003 14,950.000 D. Heed.orks No.2 Impallar/Foup Speed. 2016 2.600.000 C. Remove Trickling Filters 2 . A, ID07 1.300.000 d. 10 Had Oxygen Act'd Sludge IDAF, 2017 34,000.000 A. Digesters: t 4 110- Dfs, 20D3 L 2D12 I61200,000 E. 4 Belt Presses. 2004 10,920,000 g. 12 NV Po.ar Distribution. 2001-2012 1.100.000 b. Standby Power Generation, 2005 . 2015 5.000.000 t. 72 old Primary Tre.u..t. 2004 . 2012 Sz.so0,o00 -.-InT91. - PEr1.AMATION PLANT 1 176.195.11111 21,161.G00 20.291.223 5,259.911 lE.5J 1.I4G 19.5OS,057 a..' Or IC1.1 XOI.. CISTSULCM. Ia0Y11M.TS up 1 Sal + MCI, rut If314] 111 Ixl 1]] 1+1 Is, III m t9 e0 ..I fxOpum ¢MlvuTio C.... ru. .11111. 1 11.11Cr .11,1.10 Xon nmlcr Iwc1r COST I.1.1. ufx-v sr u9z-+] f an.nx SOIn1111 11.1. 1rs Ia o IT. IW1 1 e. ITS.,...I rl.M z 1. Supper' I¢IIII b. .M Slt. bp+nr.xnu e. .......... I.1101ne. r]-]]-5-1 sill,. x.933.000 ......... io l,er0 Ill,]a0 ]IS,f]. 21f1'..1. a. .,.Haag l.uame. 12-11-1 sul]-x 3.125.000 fe,0o0 ux,ela Sr,E]x M.S.. 0.011 e. ulnun..C. Iulmms . 1n31-1 Sleu-r 1.,...... s0,000 les..n 11.10. Is.]., I00 a. Eon 1-11On......... arue.. rx-35-. ll II]-E Sao,000 150.000 70.677 ...... la sas Ir Api .. ea... It I'. . .Carl', IM.. 12as-5 sle a-I 2,2fo,000 10.0.0 .s,no xe,ul ".III n.otl x. San.. oy..... I. 1. E. rxa'-' fio.i-o I,520.o0e 300.000 43S,749 it 415,1.0 ..I...... ....... I...... .. 1an.. 01...IS, x. 0. rx-v-] s,1o0,000 Ie0.00o I.....0 s. frl..., rr..I..n1 ]A ... una.'-. 12-41 snu-a u,xof.a00 i..5' 1.142 4,101 11.1" a. Saga rlt le alon rru be', n-.xa s)n a-. to soo,000 a..... .pu,Qa ..."S3 11.4.1.1.1 Uu,'s11 1. s¢CnNp ITS.,...1 ..pmlCn. Rdl-1 I I !]lIe-OJ 1......... 5.000.0.0 1,).e...0 105.1Ie I,.13..N 4,813.012 a. rllorllT N... Toa. , .2-0-1 ghee-. ........0 a........ u{,1.0 ....... .11,1.1 1.ID4111a 9. S.l Sale Upgrading rx-s] S210e-C 3f,000,000 3........ sl..S+i I..,SSs .e9.+.1 1.811.141 I'...1.1 m rro).-I .-I- I....... (....... ..n.0.1 aria u.'w.1. . I.-.. rx-u 52111-. e,ul,.00 MAP* n.ul 11.03 M.W l.. xI... pled 111ca10.. . rs-a-]. . sv oe-nr u.l0.,o0a ......... I.I" ".I'. Sx,QI Lue.rn rnn.ur m reObT. ..... (eo0.1141 ....,TU I.c1111, Sol INS . ..I., UpR.d.. . 12-41 St..,-0 4.521.1.. .00,OOo 12.31 lI-IN 1I1,111 Sl.clrl0a Pa. xM'm. I a.4w Mind- a plant 1. 12-41-1 Ixle1-. 100,000 leo,a00 441 .a 11.51e rae T000n. a Wily Upgrade. at Plant x. 12-41-2 silea-. loe,.e. 100,00. ..ao ...lo 'ssao Xbc ..pr..ewnu .I giant x. IS.., 1222o-0 200.00. 2o0,0o0 .,L. 4.21. U3.11. aa.\. 0um11t .1 dad_.l t... v...... rl-so 52.1.11 31n5.00. Il. 1,. IT. u. Mal urlCCntrm IT., n-.3 Saga 1-2]-1) 52oa.-0 ),ns,000 2.425,00. M.Ol. 1,].s,ne 1.131.110 1.e81.322 li. Ielld. 'wnp: x +In. 5.200,000 I,. puT OITlltill.n .I.I w, !l-.. 11 V.-0 P.M.... ...... .I] 13.... 31,.il H,la. I.. IT... Xtl.. Pu0 IT."- 1.200.04. IS. auM.I r.NT 0.Mra l0n 23.950.0.0 10.0.0 S....o .1. .eau un.I la part ........ ........0 11. I.Q.n r..J..0 (eo ....dal. .) IT........ I,oOo,om oJ.. 'n,lel xl)..33 e22.11, 1e. oIn.' r It.. gml.af. e. +apl�cet Salary ...In. .. I. c. Ie.. I61oo.0.e e. SI.Mnr anal .... .IT-, 20.1 . xou u.u..... C. xanu.rm. utl ..tml Y.Ina. I.o3 uo.000 W.-TOTAL - TIRA MST IYxr x 231,040II00 u,Is.,00o 12.140.911 1..Zf,'o IS...... a 11.11..051 c. C '. ...a l.0 an.I au.. u,1..,.ae 100.0o0 1..,.0. i. ....m ina I.nl 1 121])-. se,so0,000 nl,e.5 ui.'I] us.3'I u1xs Ul out - 1gc..url0x luxn 71.800,00. 1o0.0a0 SIT.. 3 uLsu .."M (I1 s I31 o. murp an, and mm. ...Said.. 1. I.-Ii..l ram uu.. I-9 .. Sao• Intuvl.nt '1.. S3713-0 .0.5...... u,'eo.m. Lan..oe '.ragas 1a.e l e.00I i,u1..01 trans., M Ir.l.cl ..I- ILOe,al.] 11.191.1351 .,a/c....lle.l - .I .11 v..1 suo IT Ilt x Sx Of]-o 1.1034.0 I,u..... I.x09.]R I..., I,II3.971 LO1.0I9 n. IManr\.l Sat- tine (Contract Igoe M. 51 s)l a-o ....... sa o.oo0 l.,4. Ill,". 1e4.000 M.I.. C. ma.ur ... Lin. nm-o I,900 udo 1.eao,..0 '.a'.na an,ne ia...0 ,I +.anTa, ....I, Sl� s0 o,000 Ia o.o00 ns0o Ts.Ou Is+.9IG 1 ( anreL ourur 99vaav lxp ruW SC6IDOL( SN k, Of JOINT WORSE CONSTRUCTION 9epUIRIMPOT9 Pqe ) or 6 SLAMYEAR 1922-23 9 RORTHS ENDED 3131193 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) MORN R[y15R0 TOTAL RLOVIRRO ACCUMULATED CONSENT YEAR OMPL[TLD J09 PROJECT UXr3PRXD]D ORDER v9on cT SIT BUDGET COST O"Lly I.A.SreR TO COST BUDGET 199E-93 199E-93 9 6/30192 TO 3/]1/93 TIMES ASSETS TO DATE i - ] ]. Supwrt M1clll".. ADS Slat lepr6rwenb e. Ada in. aide. EApen. I E.AeO., J-I-t LS 51911-0,15 7.200.000 100.000 1,232.644 IS.3e6 1,351,01E B4,63E N. Again Bldg Annex 9 Old Lab Site, 1-10 $2003-0 4.2251000 150.000 63,971 36,53E 95,003 123,463 c. Central Laboratory, J-Il 511D6-0 9.380.000 10D,000 ES5.318 (513,]901 163,Di6 (255,268) d. Operations/Control Center. J-23-1 S3112-A 4.325.000 SSD,000 6,05],]i9 SE3,233 4.634.561 (5],3II) e. Caeput er EpulPmt. J-il4 (9u Pa-.CI s)113N 1,350,000 635,000 ]I8,012 1,812,3(0 1,930,35E (981,3C0) L Paesonnel Build log at Plt 1. J-36 9116-0 1,1➢0,000 150.000 A,910 31,000 105,9t0 119.000 R. Oeeolu ion Ol Old Control C.nur 450.000 N. D.au utlnn ur Iolder, emg..12. 1-27 S2086-0 1.050.000 10.000 81,062 22.010 09.152 (12,890, I. own 0,,I rurnitur. Sys Pint.u3 n-062 12221-0 900,000 ]50,000 ESD.AQ. I. c.n[r.1 cen.rw.. P.cuuY A. Epm want Pr.purcN.... 1.111 537O1-C ax.000,OOo 300,000 20.353.068 93.595 20,661.143 206,405 b. ail—Son lurch.... 3-111 53701-A,e 3,050,000 3.050.080 1,Os0,0eO I. Plan, I r.r1my. J-19-1 S37O7-A 12.200,000 6,000,000 1..356.316 5.166.33E 19n02.540 (1,140,224) 4. 11-1 3 noslily, 1-12-2 53l07-8 27.900.000 1.z00,000 2S,042,856 2.302.019 27.394.875 13,102,019) Tr...I.r t0 PrvJ.rn ..1— (1.306.1881 (1,304.188) I-u-2 Bell.. Duy. R.NN 0 Plant 2 SmOr-E 994.338 u0 996.33. 995,166 1-19-1 Engine D Red n Rehab 6 Plant 1 Snel-r 309,850 309,050 309.850 ..\..ions Control for Me Wr. Generator. 52130-0 1.040.00. 2a,340 22.360 6. Nn. Cu Plans, I-]1, I-211 52060-0 930,000 25,000 52,719 52.119 (37,119) S. Oo:I I L SON NoA. Ruuane A. 3.Pun Iv Outran Be .r. J-2aa(und) 53711-0 a.11O,000 10.000 1.911.371 5,611 1,918,e48 8,523 N. 0.11. oulr.11 No I land Saclbn.n22-3 53711-A 1.311.000 1,000,000 202.753 1.341,560 1.552.313 (349.560) C. ... A.IS. Toe.r No. 1. 1-22-3 3,300.000 d. I..O C12 $utmn lot Oatta1 N0. 1 2,600,000 .. A.rend O\.rN.rR. M..... ... 'C- 4.600.GGO I. Bet. TB^ So Dup N.t.r W/120.. Outr.11 50.000.000 S. Egot want Pr.wrcN.e. J-Is-. 53703-e 1,125.000 100.000 21.3.2 1.966 23.1" 96,03e 6. Influent now.ur A Text r.cSL.J-261A/B 52Oa5-O 725,000 MISS. I L 10,000 1. I-paral\on of U111ill All.. J-2s-1 58216-0 3.0Bo,000 1.000,000 55.109 5-186 e0,29) '94.816 8. Elect'. To— eynw. bNN. BtWI.. J-25-2 58216-A 150,000 200,000 200.00. 9. i.bgan./ielwnry Nonitorin8 Sep. J48 52146-0 ..S.... 400,000 R,BCI 61,026 49.813 382.91. 10. Bombard Interplant Trunk Nplace..nt 31.000.000 11. Slud.. o\eweal I—J.cte A. Ccaw.t Demonstration Plant 2.000.000 b. Land ACpubl LLon 12.000.000 $0.000 50,000 c. Landfill D...lowmnt PN.. 1 29.600.000 d. Co.,., M1c\Illy $0.360.000 12. DI.lrirt I.1a 11an N.wlwmt btwl8 a. M.InI. L Owr n.anl ComPe 9ymtee 5316E-A 900.000 800.000 .5,580 193,00. (IO i,B6.) Q9.130 ]01.226 N. U,N Iniovrtlon nmgo.nt Sv I— 5216E-8 850,000 100,000 I]S,I55) 66,13) (],0601 10,31I SI,Sll a. PurcNs[n9/Infant:ry Control 9Ye[ee 450.000 450,000 450.000 d. A ntln./Financial Iniotvtton Syetra S2149-C 500,000 500.000 1,411 1..1E 49A,590 .. I-1. . S.re. Sy Eta. I.I..-Ilon 1 220,000 IM.O. 1 1 220.000 C.11TAL OVTYT HI.J111O NNO SCX[W Ll B-1 9VMMARY O[ I.IXT U.S.. COMSiRUCT10N IXQSI.III.M9 Beat 1 Of e FISCAL 59.Y 1912-13 9 ISMS MDXO 3/31/23 (it (2) (3) (S) (5) (6) unt" REVISED TOTAL [RPUTRW ACC@IIIYTIO CIFl2NT "A. MIUFIXTID JOB PROJECT UNIlpf"80 OBO[R I..JCCT EST ROBUST COST OUTLAY TRANSFER TO COST IU062T 1992-93 1912-93 9 6130192 TO 3131193 FIXED n5SR5 TO DATE 1 - ] 1], NlNlon Carl: 5813 aV Wr4 an. 9119-1 1.200.000 1,200,000 1.200,000 u. Built. x.r.reon. ...I. Collection Lou w... 100.000 100,000 to0.000 u. I•Vrwoe In-11-1, Sam,,, f•c1111Ie... J-]x s2212.0 25O,o00 I50,000 41,n1 41.171 108.17, 16. Reconstruct Odor Control Nauux.•. 2.000.000 t,0oo,000 1.000,000 Il. ..,at 0u.uly ISAW Sind, 58221-0 110.000 10.000 95.603 (30.625) N,978 40.625 16. Tactile Pipe Claim L nevi (it Share) 1-19 S2111-0 150.000 100.000 1..$, S,OST I00,000 19. "toe ProJerb (See Remodel. 81 11,000,000 1.000.000 66,Je1 152.910 211,021 W.... 20, otter ...ur It.. Project. ..pl... IV Oult.11 .11n 120" FOR' zO,xep.000 B. Rap•na 00.1 •C" to norm 2011 21.1z5,B00 a. SmeF• DI•P. Landfill In... 11 2011 u,WO,o.. e. Sluele OLp. Bonin Puss 16 a 2001 u.saO,00O SUB-TOTAL - INTERPLANT 6 Jot" 632,1S1,000 31.260.000 79.732.695 25.7.2.531 (623.114) 104,909,062 S.461,469 SUB-TOTAL - XUJOR PROJECTS I,220,017,000 14,VS,000 121,2141600 33,190,936 (62],164) 153.762.3E 41.084,014 2. Sgcla PFoJ.c u, Stuel.. 6 Ro.. In act,.. Plan: U 1. RUDER Permit ( Application) 58201-I 375.000 S0,000 21J,813 65.231 336,144 4.769 3. NPDE9 Permit (XOnitorinE CMnI.•) 50.000 50.000 50,000 ]. XPOES Permit ( Oc•.n NL ON.) 490.000 2a...O. 200,000 L Solids Treat...I. 01.1m.1 .M Reus. 1.350.000 200.000 200,000 Tvn.Le In Protect 1.1.. (6791 (679) Sludp O ach." Nlrt.d Fr0J... 98214-0 671 251,118 oil L51,791 C. U..p Oct.. Ol.p.••1 Fv.lu.l tan 11751-0 1.522.000 50.000 578,SZ, 516,529 30.000 0. AJP Quality Control Peodrem 1. Air Toalc. Inventory (I1125RR ./ 1.91) 58218-0 1.122.000 250,000 740,965 2.1.1 10.1.6 30,835 Tempel- m PIDJ.cl. R.lo. (250.000) 1250.000) Atr To.IC. LIs01on• I...DID, Import t1612) 6 ...Ilh pint ....ev..I (Mal 58219-A 423.142 24,011 161.53, 24,011 185.555 VOC L Worou. It Im1s.len• Inventory Program 58215-. 670.000 225.984 I44,394 270,471 .I.,.IJ 144.4231 2. VOCJROE RACE O.monstratlon Program SRi l T-0 850...0 ..a.... 5,419 5,419 "..Sol ]. Air I.1••lons Source Control 470.0.. 60.000 $0.000 .. ECAQ"D Rule .]I.I:XIS SOO,000 450.000 4S0,000 S. SCAQUIO Out. II79:10TV ORS S.5,000 545,000 545.000 1. ..Art Canury L Nc Lotion l60 ProJ.CI• 310$0,000 400,000 400.000 TmmLr to Protect NI.- (127,.]0) 1127.430) Stl Rucn ..eb VBear Project Pell. 1[Wy 52133-• .9,260 81,210 2,510 2,568 89,260 F10. M0nitorlo. foe Water Core., PrOJ.ct Pt I 50331-0 39.11. 3.,170 4,195 I.,l.i 22.917 19..6E 1. ..,at Pit. Vvd.t. I,S00,000 It...far to Prolact ..I. (950,1391 Oeval . AUDI of .1...I., each t0 Nuct Indicator 6 NtN.enlc MlcrPoeEmly. In Treace VJM Met Pm J.cl W-9 b0I 56228-0 453.916 101,612 1.2,63. (102.631) Culls Nttb. Xatnl StWy Vein[ M01.cul.r Tech to Oelect X.patltus A VIP.. . virulent F¢te can.. In .. COIF. Mai Prof XR-92-06 5.321-. 596.621 123.961) (23.961, 23.961 SV.-TOTAL - SPECIAL PROJECTS 13.961.572 2..55,000 2,114,a21 443.316 2.620157 2.402.664 ]. .Quip.., ito. 49.315,000 3.500.000 254.55, 1.6.4.761 (1.6]0,145) 308.678 1,815.233 SUE-- - JOINT WORKS CAPITAL R[p 1 '11,Stt 10,610,000 123.643.977 ]S.]21,0)9 1L 351,a09) 156,211.1 SS.]0..961 [OMSTRVCTIV 110Q[SS CONPI, TC0 11 6/]0/9i SCHEDULE I H0.500 .OI,02. (ts,a]II 355. t01.Ot) TOP L`...Xi MORXS CA P 1 TAt RED.IR N[n E5 I. e...11.17. 80.630.000 524.164,.63 ]5.133,06] 12.919,6401 156,961.9 1..107,911 i May 13. 1993 Ms.Patricia Gorczyea Financial Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10841 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728 Dear Ms.Gorezyca: In regard to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County's(the "Districts") selection of oar two firms to serve as co-swap managers for the Districts' proposed 1993 interest Rate Swap, we propose the following arrangement for compensation of services between Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber associated with the above transaction: It is expected that: — Merrill Lynch Capital Services will serve as the swap counterpart to the Districts, pursuant to standard documentation. — Merrill Lynch&Co.and PaineWebber will jointly structure the swap transaction and assist the Districts' staff in board and rating agency presentations. — Merrill Lynch&Co. and PaineWebber will establish a competitive swap level that is acceptable to the Districts and to Merrill Lynch Capital Services as counterparty. — Upon completion,Merrill Lynch&Co.will pay to PaineWebber the lesser of the present value of 5 basis points or 1/2 of the total spread per annum from the net spread(such amount to be disclosed in fall to the Districts prior to completion of the transaction)for services provided to the Districts. We lack forward to working with the Districts on this program. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call either one of us. Sincerely, Samuel B. Corliss,Jr. John B.Costs Managing Director Vice President Merrill Lynch&Co. PaineWebber Jnc. Agreement and Acceptance by: J. Wayne Sylvester �� General Manager-County Sanitation Districts efOrange County ®RRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE (213) 612-2405 May 12, 1993 Thomas Woodruff, Esq. Rourke Woodruff & Spradlin 701 S. Parker Street, Suite 7000 Orange, CA 92668 Re: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Dear Mr. Woodruff: We at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe appreciate the action of the Fiscal Policy Committee in recommending our firm to serve as Bond Counsel with respect to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County's upcoming refunding issue and interest rate swap program. In that connection we propose a fixed fee for the contemplated refunding issue. If the issue is structured as a synthetic-fixed rate issue, we propose a fee of $85,000.00. If it is structured as a traditional fixed rate issue, we propose a fee of $60,000. 00. In addition to the fee, we would be reimbursed for our disbursements in connection with the issue, including long-distance telephone calls, telecopy charges, messenger and delivery charges, computer and word-processing charges and expenses incurred in any travel outside of California. The fee, but not the reimbursement of expenses, would be contingent upon the successful closing of the issue. In connection with the interest rate swap program we propose a fee based on the standard hourly charges of the persons performing services with a cap of $15,000.00. In addition to this fee, we would be reimbursed for our disbursements in connection with the program, including long-distance telephone calls, telecopy charges, messenger and delivery charges, computer and word-processing charges and expenses incurred in any travel outside California. Neither the fee for these services nor the reimbursement of expenses would be contingent upon the Districts actually entering in to any interest rate swap transaction. TT269mhFyu Same, n W Anetla.G mm90912 Tele9 m213 6292020 . Baam062U 61224N San Frmu 413 392 IM . New Ymh 212 326 6690 • Sanumenm 916 »2 92W IAIJ6296.1 1 ®RRICK.HERRINGCON & SUTCLIFFE Thomas Woodruff, Esq. May 12 , 1993 Page 2 I hope the foregoing is responsive to your request for fee proposals. As I indicated in our discussions of this matter, we would be happy to discuss other types of fee arrangements which you or the Districts feel may be more appropriate for a particular matter. We look forward to working with you and the other representatives of the Districts. Very truly yours, Eugep'Q J . arron EJC:gmm ((// uisnZss.� Eke W Chenevey Vice President Municipal Markets Public Finance Debt Markets Group 400 South Hope Street Merrill Lynch Suite2020 Los Angeles,California 90071-2821 213 693 4581 FAX 213 683 4514 May 13, 1993 Ms.Patricia Gorczyca Financial Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,CA 92728 Dear Patti: As you are well aware, Merrill Lynch is presently monitoring the Districts' remaining Series B debt service ..� obligations in hopes that rates will decline far enough to achieve the Districts' 3.0% present value savings target. Given the volatile nature of the current interest rate environment,this opportunity could present itself for only a short period of time. Should this opportunity arise, the Districts should be prepared to enter the market immediately. It is under this premise that we wish to propose our underwriter's discount in conjunction with the Series B advance refunding, should interest mtes decline to levels which produce the Districts' targeted debt service savings. In conjunction with underwriting the Districts' bonds, we intend to provide all customary services associated with a bond financing, including review of all legal documents, aggressive pre-marketing and marketing efforts, and examination of financing structures to achieve the lowest possible interest cost. Bearing these services in mind,if rates were to drop and a fixed mte deal became feasible,we would propose a spread of 58.50, assuming an issue size of$50 to St 00 million. In conjunction with a variable rate transaction, we would propose a 53.50 spread. These spreads reflect a lower management fee due to the nature of a refunding which involves less structuring requirements than a new money issue. We will continue to monitor this financing,and will surely keep you posted as to any developments. Should you have any questions or comments,please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, Ellice Chenevey Vice President Agreement and Acceptance by: J. Wayne Sylvester Genera(d4anager-County Sanitation Districts of Orange County CALIFORNIA FIXED RATE ISSUES 550-100 11HLLION 1992-51593 (SOURCE:SECURITIgS DATA CO./BOND BUYER) SALE AMOUNT GROSS DATE (MLS) ISSUER ISSUE N/C SPREAD 07/0792 $70.000 Los Angeles Dept of Wtr&Power Water Works Revenue Bonds C $4.55 0512092 $71.340 Contra Costs Water District Water Revenue Bonds N $4.84 06/16/92 560.000 East Bay Regional Park Dt General Obligation Bonds C $5.71 0410792 $50.000 Los Angeles Dept of Wtr&Power Waterworks Revenue Bonds C $&DO 01/08/93 $74.500 San Francisco Bay Rapid Traw Dt Subor Sales In Revenue Bds N $6.39 04/22/93 579.585 East Bay MUD Wastewtr Subord Refund Bds N $7.25 01/22/92 $73.480 Kings Ricer Conservation Dt Power Revenue Ref Bonds N $7.30 04/30192 $82.115 Santa Cleve Co-California Certificates of Participation N $8.03 07/0292 $56.665 California Health Fees Fin Auth Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds N 58.25 12/1692 564.905 California Statewide Comm Dev An Certificates of Participation N 58.25 I M2092 $69.745 South Coast Air Quality Mgmt Dt Installment Sale Rev Bonds N 58.43 06/1892 $78.190 Desert Hospital District Insured Hospital Rev COPs N 58.48 0112192 $63.110 Los Angeles Dept of Wtr&Power Waterworks Ref Rev Bonds C $9.50 07/1092 $90.195 Berkeley-California Health I=Ref Rev Bonds N $8.50 022593 $99.605 ABAO Fin Ants for Non-Profit Corp Certificates of Participation N $8.68 112592 $97.655 Oakland Redevelopment Agency Sr Tax Allocation Ref Bds N 58.74 11/1892 582.470 San 3osc-Califnnia Airport Revenue Bonds N $8.86 02/0792 $72.800 California Health Fats Fin Auth Insured Hap Rev Bonds N $9.00 I0J0792 $74.240 Santa Clam Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds N $9.00 10/0292 $54.220 Merced Co-California Certificates of Participation N $9.22 03/1992 566.530 ReddingCalif smia Electric Sys Rev Corts of Piano N - $9.25 01/0992 $92.777 Anaheim-Califnnia Certificates of Participation N $9.30 092392 $7L995 Modesto Irrigation District Domestic Water Project Bonds N $9.55 0122/92 $85.000 Santa Fe Springs Rodev Agency Tmr Allocation Bonds N 59.73 09/0292 561.900 Orange Co Muni Water Ot Certificates ofPsrticipation N $9.76 12/0292 $75.000 Chula Vista-Califomis Indust Develop Revenue Bds N 59.80 06/10/92 $62.525 Altruists CoCalifmnia Certificates of Participation N $10.00 1211692 $50.000 California PC Finance Auth Pollution Control Rev Bonds N $10.02 04/0192 $56.477 Mountain View Cap lmprov Fin An Revenue Bonds N $10.12 03/1992 $50.650 Modesto litigation District Revenue Bonds N $10.18 03118M $59.810 Desert Sends Unified SD Certificates of Participation N $10.20 01/0992 $85.645 Las Angeles Reg Ain"Imp Corp Facilities Lease Rev Bonds N $10.52 10/15/92 $52.880 Stockton-East Water Ot Certificates of Participation N $11.00 O1/1792 $99.905 San Bernardino CoCalifnnia Certificates ofPerticipation N 511.50 01/1092 561.191 Ontario Redevelopment Agency Revenue Bonds N $11.96 072292 $50.000 Oakland-Catifvaia General Obligation Bonds C $12.00 O6/0992 $52.910 Pon of OaklandCalifonnia Special Facilities Rev Bonds N $12.15 OS/0792 $54.830 Les Angeles Comm College Dt Refunding Cens of Participations N $14.00 102892 555.530 Vallejo-California Revenue Bonds C $14.92 04/0792 $82.000 San Jose Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Bonds C $15.00 CALIFORNIA VRDO ISSUES S50- 100 MILLION 1992-5/5/93 (SOURCE: SECURITIES DATA CO./BOND BUYER) SALE AMOUNT GROSS DATE NMS) ISSUER ISSUE N/C SPREAD 09/23/92 $64.275 Riverside Co-California Ref Certs of Participation N - 12/14/92 . $50.000 California Higher Ed Loan Auth Wkly Adj Rte Student Loan N 12/16/92 $60.000 Contra Costa-California Multi-Fam Housing Rev Bds N - 10/12/92 $91.000 Newport Beach-California Var Rte Demand Rev Bonds N $1.50 06/l0/92 $98.700 Los Angeles Co Transport Commiss Sales Tax Rev Ref Bonds N $3.52 11/19/92 $95.000 San Francisco Redev Agency Var Rte Multi-Fain Hsg Ref Bds N $3.95 10/29/92 $69.000 Orange Co-California Apt Develop Rev Ref Bonds N $4.14 . 09/01/92 $98.500 Orange Co Sanitation Dt#1 2&3 Certificates of Participation N $5.50 09/02/92 $61.900 Orange Co Muni Water Dt Certificates of Participation N $9.76 04/29/93 $70.795 San Diego-Califomia Indus Develop Refund Bonds N $9.80 ®RRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE Dian Dial (213) 612-2405 May 12, 1993 Thomas Woodruff, Esq. Rourke Woodruff & Spradlin 701 S. Parker Street, Suite 7000 Orange, CA 92668 Re: County Sanitation Districts of Oranae County Dear Mr. Woodruff: We at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe appreciate the action of the Fiscal Policy Committee in recommending our firm to serve as Bond Counsel with respect to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County's upcoming refunding issue and �..i interest rate swap program. In that connection we propose a fixed fee for the contemplated refunding issue. If the issue is structured as a synthetic-fixed rate issue, we propose a fee of $85,000.00. If it is structured as a traditional fixed rate issue, we propose a fee of $60, 000. 00. In addition to the fee, we would be reimbursed for our disbursements in connection with the issue, including long-distance telephone calls, telecopy charges, messenger and delivery charges, computer and word-processing charges and expenses incurred in any travel outside of California. The fee, but not the reimbursement of expenses, would be contingent upon the successful closing of the issue. In connection with the interest rate swap program we propose a fee based on the standard hourly charges of the persons performing services with a cap of $15,000.00. In addition to this fee, we would be reimbursed for our disbursements in connection with the program, including long-distance telephone calls, telecopy charges, messenger and delivery charges, computer and word-processing charges and expenses incurred in any travel outside California. Neither the fee for these services nor the reimbursement of expenses would be contingent upon the Districts actually entering in to any interest rate swap transaction. ])]SouthfipwmSmm • Las Anplw.allfomic9= Tdghone 2136292020 • FaaMlle 21361224W San F.nnduo 115 392 1122 • New Yo.A 212 326 WX • Saaeaww tw 916 442 92W IA1462%.1 ®RRICK,HERRINGTON &SUTCLIFFE Thomas Woodruff, Esq. May 12, 1993 Page 2 I hope the foregoing is responsive to your request for fee proposals. As I indicated in our discussions of this matter, we would be happy to discuss other types of fee arrangements which you or the Districts feel may be more appropriate for a particular matter. We look forward to working with you and the other representatives of the Districts. Very truly yours, Eugea'� J. arron EJC:gmm (/ uucns.� MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER SI FERDON leo MAmEry LANE 2 1 BT FLOOR ue, 2 STREET,N.w. NEW YEAR.xCw YORN 00p B-+BBB WASHINGTON.D.C.10037 I898 SA IO-2000 333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE 202+29 9355 `i B30 FIFTH VENUE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 9007 1-1 5 2 5 SUITE...NORTHBRIDGE CENTRE aoln G. 2 13-613-1 1 1 2 1.n..AT.'LADLED M,YE x2w TORN.M.Y. ID O M I++ WEST PAL BEACH.'I.SE... v. 212-aa2-leo0 +oT-eno-eloo 'ACBIMILE: MORPtS CORPORATE CENTER TWO RDE DE LA PAIR O.A MRREB REM,O RMO BLOS.O 2Ia-eeo-u ne 7e002.PARIS.FRANCE PARSIPPANY,NEWJERSEY 0705+-I0I5 ,u+2....BY.7. 201 335-000+ — TOPANOMOM 37 MORN BUILDING B-I TORANOMON 3-CMOME.MINATO-XU COWARD W. LONO TOMYO GA.JAPAN PA ITNEP IOL 303)JBBI WRITER'S DIRECT MUMRR (213) 229-2301 (vD(CDIIIBu) May 10, 1993 Mr. William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Joint Boards of Directors Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 $160,000, 000 Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 series Mudge Rose Billing Dear Messrs. Mahoney and Sylvester: As you know, Mudge Rose seeks a billing adjustment for our work in the captioned financing. We have sought to work with the Districts to establish the appropriate level of that adjustment. General Counsel to the Districts has advised us that the Districts' Boards have acted to deny any billing adjustment. I am writing at this time to respectfully request that this matter be reconsidered by the Districts' Boards. I believe that the denial of a billing adjustment is inappropriate in the circumstances, and could only be based on a misunderstanding of the underlying contract, the background of the transaction or both. I would very much appreciate the v Mr. William D. Mahoney Mr. J. Wayne Sylvester May 10, 1993 Page 2 opportunity to be present for such a reconsideration, and to assist in a reasonable resolution of this matter. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, d W ong EWL:mdt E Via Facsimile Transmission Confirmed Via Federal Express cc: Patricia M. Gorczyca Gary G. Streed Thomas L. Woodruff COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1993-94 JOINT WORKS BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE tl 0151PICTS pp 0 p4H0 yP CO i � Lys 2 i O O U D q y0 q0, y FOr,N � 5\aO0 O THE ENVIRONME� MAY 26, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1993-94 JOINT WORKS BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 015TRICTS OF 0y4HC�c0 a '�► O C U 9 TP 04. O THE ENVIFONME� MAY 2691993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS May 26, 1993 01 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA IOSAA ELLIS AVENUE e PO.BO%8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 82728-8127 MEMORANDUM 014)962.2411 TO: Joint Boards of Directors FROM: Executive Committee SUBJECT: Summary Report and Recommendation re 1993-94 Joint Works Budgets (Personnel, Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund) Recommendation The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee recommendation to adopt the enclosed 1993-94 Joint Works Personnel, Operating r and Construction Budgets. Summary Report The accompanying budget documents provide detailed information concerning the proposed Joint Works Budgets. The following table shows the total Joint Works budgets for operations and maintenance and capital improvements for the last two years, and the proposals for 1993-94: Approved Approved Proposed 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 Joint Operating Fund $ 50,031,000 $ 48,648,000 $ 49,579,000 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund 114,151,000 80,630,000 70,032,000 r Total $764.151.000 $129.278.000 $119.611.000 Percent (Decrease) From 1991-92 121.2%1 (27.1%1 Percent (Decrease) From 1992-93 71 5%1 Again this year, the poor economic climate, the uncertainty of property tax -d allocations, and sensitivity to the continuing difficult financial problems of our member agencies have had an impact on the Joint Works budget process. r Summary Report and Recommendations . Page 2 May 26, 1993 Although costs of complying with stricter environmental and public health standards continue to rise, the General Manager has directed staff to prepare a - "hold-the-line" budget again for 1993-94, and has recommended that sewer use and connection fees not be increased in 1993-94, unless the state confiscates more of the Districts' property taxes. This was approved by the Directors at the `^ May Joint Boards meeting. These are the same rates adopted for 1991-92 and 1992-93, except that user fees for 1992-93 were ultimately increased for the confiscation of property taxes approved by the state in September 1992. Although we are currently bringing expansive new facilities on-line, staff believes ' we can get by partially due to certain changes in operations and by reorganizing some activities, but this will require us to delay, scale back or eliminate some projects and programs. V The following discussion highlights and summarizes the recommendations for the three elements of the Joint Works budgets. These proposed budgets can be funded and prudent reserve levels can be maintained at the revenue levels of 1992-93; no additional fees or revenues will be required as long as total revenues are maintained. Personnel (See Blue/Gold Report) Staffing Levels I - Over the past three years, more than $315 million of new plant facilities and V equipment have been completed. We currently have $136.7 million in new treatment plant facilities and $14.4 million in individual District facilities under construction. An additional $174.2 million in treatment facilities and $50.6 L million in collection facilities are being designed and will be constructed and placed into service over the next several years, and another $153.1 million worth of projects are in the planning stages. The 30-year Action Plan Master Plan 6w adopted by the Boards in August 1989 projects capital improvements totaling $1.48 billion (in 1989 dollars) under current NPDES permit conditions. I - Staff has previously advised the Directors that this major treatment plant L' expansion and new program implementation necessary to comply with changing I regulatory requirements would require significant staffing increases to operate and maintain the new facilities and to support related activities and other required programs. However, as noted above, reductions in our wastewater management program and organizational changes that we have made will enable us to delay adding necessary operating, maintenance and support staff. These changes actually result in a net decrease of six positions for the 1992-93/1993-94 period. W W Summary Report and Recommendations Page 3 May 26, 1993 The 1993-94 personnel changes and corresponding organizational changes and charts were reviewed and approved by the Committee in April. One position was deleted and some reassignments were made for new or expanding programs, treatment plant processes and equipment, for a net savings of $42,732. These changes are included in the projections in the attached proposed Joint Operating Fund (JO) Budget (green). These changes are summarized below: SUMMARY OF PROPOSED 1993-94 STAFFING CHANGES Annual Positions Increase Program/System Add (Delete) (Decrease) Finance Purchasing/Warehousing .0- $01,508) Operations and Maintenance Technical Support (1) $( 9,324) Operations & Maintenance 2 102,852 Technical Services Conservation/Reclamation/Recycle (1) $(59,040) Regulatory Compliance (1) (65,712) TOTAL CHANGES (11 $142,732) The proposed changes would reduce the total authorized staffing level from 665 to 664. Out-of-pocket employee benefits paid by the Districts, including retirement, health, life, disability, workers' compensation and unemployment insurance and uniforms, would add approximately 27% to the above salary savings. Memoranda of Understanding Salary Adiustments As the Directors are aware, three-year Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with the Districts' employee groups were adopted during 1991 for the period ending November 25, 1993. Salary ranges specified in this report and recommendations —� include no adjustments for the meet-and-confer process at the end of the current MOU period. Summary Report and Recommendations .. Page 4 May 26, 1993 Projected Total Pavroll Cost The full employment payroll and benefits estimate is $36.3 million. Some payroll budget savings may be realized due to personnel turnover, delays in filling vacant positions, tight control over hiring activities, adjustments in plant operation schedules and procedures to minimize staffing, and delays in major construction schedules. The Districts' contribution to the retirement system (OCERS) is ! budgeted at the low current rate. Any increase in rates to approach the prior �+ year's level would have to be funded from payroll savings or accumulated reserves. � V Net payroll and benefits, after chargeouts to CORF and the Districts, account for approximately 53% of the total budgeted net Joint Operating costs. Joint Operating Budget - JO (See Green Report) The $49.6 million Joint Operating budget finances the operating and Lr maintenance costs of the joint treatment works and the joint administrative activities. The Joint Operating expense budget remains below the 1991-92 budget, but has been increased 1.8% from the 1992-93 budget and several appropriations have been reallocated. The major factors that account for the level of our Joint Works operating and maintenance costs include: L+ - Regulatory Requirements: More stringent air pollution control requirements mandated or expected to be mandated by the South Coast Air Quality 1 Management District (AQMD) for control and reduction of hydrogen sulfide V (H2S), oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and oxides of sulfur (SOx) emissions, result in high operational costs to remove pollutants from the digester gas produced in our treatment plants and to control emissions from our digester- - gas-fired engines used for Central Power Generation Facilities which will come on-line this year. Lr Costs for monitoring, enforcement, outside and in-house laboratory services and special project activities carried out by the Compliance, Air Quality, 1 Laboratory and Source Control staffs to comply with the ocean monitoring 6W and pretreatment program provisions of our NPDES permit as well as our AQMD permit requirements. - Property Insurance: An enhanced risk management program, a more accurate asset valuation , and a "tight" insurance market have combined to increase the cost of this major budgetary category. Summary Report and Recommendations Page 5 May 26, 1993 - Sludge Disposal: Costs for hauling and disposal in a private landfill of waste activated sludge and grit and screenings which the Regional Water Quality Control Board has determined cannot be disposed of at a municipal landfill; and costs for hauling and private beneficial reuse alternatives to landfill disposal. These costs continue to be a significant budget item despite favorable contract negotiations for next year. Odor Control: Chemical usage for expanded odor control program including potential increases in the unit cost of chlorine and caustic soda used in scrubber operations. Optimizing the use of the new scrubber equipment has provided a budgetary decrease for these major expenses for 1993-94. - Repairs and Maintenance: Preventive maintenance and repair activities throughout the Districts' expanded and upgraded treatment facilities continue this budgetary category at a significant level, but no increase is proposed. The following table summarizes the major new elements of the 1993-94 budgets required for programmatic or mandated changes, some of which have been offset by reductions in other areas for a net increase of $931 ,000: Water Quality Outside Laboratory Services (CWA Sec. 503) $50,000 .. Ocean Monitoring 110,000 Underground Tank Fees 56,000 $216,000 Air Quality s+ Air Toxics (A132588) $200,000 Voc/Odor Inventory (JEIP) 420,000 New Source Review of Carcinogenic Air Contaminants & Toxic Contaminants (Rules 1401 & 1402) 25,000 Central Generation -J19-1 & J19.2 25.0GO 670,ODO Property Insurance 452,660 REQUIRED PROGRAMMATIC INCREASES $1,338,660 .,r Summary Report and Recommendations r Page 6 May 26, 1993 Comparison with 1992-93 Budget: Schedule I of the Joint Operating Budget (Green Report) highlights the summary comparisons between the proposed .. 1993-94 budget and last year's budget. Schedule III contains the detail or line items for each year, and Schedule IV summarizes the reasons for the changes by major budget category. Self-Funded Insurance Plans j Ld The Districts have been self insured for several types of coverage for the past several years as a result of Fiscal Policy Committee recommendations that were i implemented by the Joint Boards of Directors. Workers' Compensation and Public Liability I L.i - The Workers' Compensation and Public Liability plans have been in existence since 1979. L - The savings realized through these self-insured plans plus in-lieu premiums deposited and interest earnings on the reserves in these funds have resulted `j in a projected June 30, 1993, reserve level of $3.9 million, compared to the original $500,000 reserve level set by the Boards when the plans were established. - An appropriation of $225,000 for in-lieu premium contributions by the L Districts is recommended in the Workers' Compensation Fund, the same level as for 1992-93. This in-lieu premium and a small draw from reserves will provide for a 25% increase in costs. L+ - No appropriation of for in-lieu premium contributions by the Districts is recommended for the Public Liability Fund. The annual in-lieu premium is typically $260,000, However, In 1992-93, the premium was increased to recover some of the costs incurred for the Montrose claim. During the year, these costs have been recovered from various insurance companies resulting I in a projected $1,025,000 increase in reserves. L - The Liability Fund in-lieu premium is proposed to be redirected to the All-Risk I Property Insurance to maintain current coverages for increased property values in an unfavorable market. L Health Plan - In March the staff provided the Directors with a separate report on the self- funded plan and measures being taken to control costs. Summary Report and Recommendations Page 7 May 26, 1993 - The self-funded Employee Health Plan has also been in existence since 1979. Total costs have increased due to continuing increases in the total numbers of active employees, their dependents, and retired employees participating in the plan. - Effective July 1993, the employees' share of costs will again increase for two-party and for family coverage, in accordance with the provisions for the last year of the approved MOUs, which is expected to cause a reduction in participants and an increase in HMO participants. CORF Budget fSee Yellow Report) The $70 million Capital Outlay Revolving Fund (CORF) Budget finances the construction of the Joint Works Treatment Facilities. It includes major and minor projects which have generally been previously presented to the Boards for review as part of the Master Plan and/or agenda process. Any project under $15,000 requires informal bidding. Projects over $15,000 require formal bidding, and any projects over $25,000 require Board approval in accordance with District procurement regulations. The budget is prepared under assumptions included in the 30-year Facilities Improvement and Expansion Master Plan approved by the Directors in 1989. s✓ - Source of Funds: The budget will be financed from existing capital funds accumulated in the individual Districts' Capital Facilities Funds, connection fees paid by new development, and from new borrowing to be approved by the Directors, as recommended in the "2020 VISION" Financial Master Plan. - Master-Planned Proiects: The 1993-94 CORF requirements total $70,032,000. The budget includes funds for several major master-planned projects, including a 120" interplant utility and effluent line, secondary treatment expansion at Plant 2, miscellaneous seismic retrofit improvements at both plants and support facilities at Plant 2. Project Categorization: Schedule B-2 (blue) entitled Classification of Budgeted Projects by Revenue Program Categories classifies all the proposed 1993-94 capital outlay projects into three categories to assist the Directors in evaluating the need for the proposed levels of expenditures. Total planned improvements through 2020 are also categorized. These categories are: Replacement/Reconstruction Projects - These projects are required to ,_, replace or rehabilitate aging or deteriorated equipment or structures. Summary Report and Recommendations u Page 8 May 26, 1993 - Improvement/Uograde Proiects - These projects are mandated by various regulatory agencies, including the EPA, State Regional Water Quality Control Boards, South Coast Air Quality Management District, and other local agencies. r - Additional Capacity/Increased Hydraulic Requirements Projects - These projects are required to accommodate increased hydraulic requirements j (additional flows) that the Joint Works facilities must process and dispose of over the next five to ten years, as identified in the latest Joint Works Master Plan. v The $70,032,000 in proposed CORF projects is allocated to these three categories as follows: u PROJECT CATEGORY 1993-94 BUDGET ALLOCATION lr Replacement/Reconstruction $28,322,500 Improvement/Upgrade 29,397,000 Increased Hydraulic Requirements 12,312,500 L� Total 1993-94 CORF Budget $70.032.000 V The staff is available to answer any questions from the Directors. If you desire additional information before the meeting, please contact Wayne Sylvester or Gary Streed at (714) 962-2411. V L GGS:Ic aEF:V&V0C%&".0 W0J0M03e v Attachments L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS _. ``Pt\Od GIST RICTS OF OygHCF yP? 00 ti � GZa 2 s O O U D O THE ENVIFONMf 1993-1994 FISCAL YEAR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS PI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA April 15, 1993 10644 ELLIS AVENUE P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9272E-8127 O 14)962@411 MEMORANDUM r TO: Fiscal Policy Committee SUBJECT: Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes for Fiscal Year 1993-94 _ BACKGROUND During the annual budget preparation process, the staff evaluates personnel .. requirements for the upcoming and future fiscal years. This review of staffing needs takes into consideration programs set forth in the Boards' 30- year wastewater management action plan, "2020 VISION," adopted by the Directors in 1989, anticipated new or expanded regulations and programmatic changes, the start up of new facilities and the ongoing v maintenance and operation of the existing Joint Works Treatment Facilities and the individual Districts' collection systems. Major treatment plant expansion and new programs being implemented to comply with changing regulatory requirements will require significant staffing increases over the next several years to operate and maintain the facilities and to provide support for related activities and other required programs. Virtually all Districts' activities are dictated by regulatory authorities. For example, at the federal level, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; at the state level, the Water Quality Control Board; and at the local level, the AFF South Coast Air Quality Management District and the Health Department. Our sewerage facilities are expanding between $70 and $100 million a year, and the regulatory authorities are imposing even stricter requirements. Very few of our projects or programs are discretionary. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Because of current economic conditions, the General Manager has directed staff to prepare the 1993-94 budgets on a "hold-the-line" basis that will enable the adoption of budgets with no fee increases. Although we are currently bringing expansive new facilities on-line, staff believes we can Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes Page 2 April 15, 1993 squeeze by, partially due to certain changes in operations and by reorganizing some activities, but this will require us to again operate marginally in 1993-94. This is considered a short-term situation and our wastewater management program requirements will need to be reevaluated next year with probable staffing increases necessary. Staff is recommending a net reduction of one position for a net salary savings of $42,732 for 1993-94. Included are several minor organizational changes to allow us to better allocate our staff resources. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED 1993-94 STAFFING CHANGES Annual Positions Increase Program/System Add (Delete) (Decrease) Finance Purchasing/Warehousing .0. $(11,508) Ooerations and Maintenance Technical Support (1) $( 9,324) Operations & Maintenance 2 102,852 Technical Services Conservation/Reclamation/Recycle (1) $(59,040) Regulatory Compliance (1) (65,712) TOTAL CHANGES (1) $(42,732) _ The proposed changes would reduce the total authorized staffing level from 665 to 664. Out-of-pocket employee benefits paid by the Districts, including retirement, health, life, disability, workers' compensation and unemployment insurance and uniforms, would add approximately 27% to the above salary savings. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes Page 3 April 15, 1993 J DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED 1993-94 STAFFING CHANGES The following discussion provides a summary explanation of the proposed staff changes for 1993-94. The salary cost and position changes are summarized in Exhibit A by Department and Division, and in Exhibit B by position classification. Organization charts (goldenrod) incorporating the proposed changes are also included. MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT The Management Department includes the General Manager's office, the Board Secretary's office, the Management Support and Public Information Office, and the Personnel and Safety/Security office. Thirty-one full-time and seven part-time positions are currently authorized in this department. 2150 - General Manager's Office No changes are proposed in this office. 2160 - Board Secretary's Office No changes are proposed in this office. 2170 - Management Support and Public Information No changes are proposed in this office. 2180 - Personnel and Safety/Security No changes are proposed in this office. FINANCE DEPARTMENT The Finance Department includes the Director of Finance's office, the Accounting Division, the Purchasing and Warehouse Division, and the Information Services Division. A total of 60 positions are currently authorized in this Department. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes .. Page 4 April 15, 1993 2210 - Director of Finance's Office No changes are proposed in this office. 2220 - Accounting Division No changes are proposed in this Division. 2230 - Purchasing Division There are 18 authorized positions in the Purchasing and Warehousing Division. This Division is responsible for the warehouses at both plants, purchasing all necessary materials, parts and supplies, and preparing bid documents. The proposed reallocation and deletion of one Supervising Buyer ($3,700 - $5,235) position to a Buyer ($2,755 - $3,910) position will better provide for future day-to-day needs. The addition of a Secretary ($2,404 - $2,994) position and the deletion of one Senior Clerk ($2,111 - $2,628) position will allow the reclassification of an incumbent to more properly reflect the nature and level of the duties performed. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT The Operations and Maintenance Department is responsible for the day-to- day operations and maintenance of Joint Works Treatment Facilities and the individual Districts' collection systems. There are 368 authorized positions in this Department which is organized into 7 Divisions. _ 3310 - Director of Operations and Maintenance Office Some of the duties and responsibilities of the Technical Support Group within the Director's office are proposed to be realigned. This group is responsible for emergency preparedness, operational research, testing, chemical and material evaluations, report preparation and plant operational optimization. _ A new Compliance Supervisor ($4,725 - $6,685) position is proposed to be added and an Engineer ($4,495 - $6,361) position is proposed to be deleted in order to provide supervision for the research and process compliance and efficiency studies. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes Page 5 April 15, 1993 A Scientist ($4,080 - $5,775) position is proposed to replace a Principal Environmental Specialist ($3,880 - $5,490) position in order to properly classify the nature of the work actually being performed. Additionally, an Intern ($16/hr. max.) is proposed for deletion in this office and transfer to the Director of Technical Services' office to better allocate the resources of this program. 3330 - Plant Maintenance The Plant Maintenance Division is responsible for digester cleaning, grounds maintenance, painting, plumbing, carpentry, janitorial services and general labor assignments throughout the plants. Fifty-eight positions are currently authorized for this Division. The deletion of one Foreman ($3,355 - $4,745) position is proposed as his duties have been consolidated with other foreman positions. 3340 - Collection Facilities Division 3340 is responsible for maintenance of the Districts' more than 800 miles of trunkline sewers, outlying pump stations, in-plant side stream pump stations, and the trunk sewer caustic soda injection program for odor control. There are 31 authorized positions in this Division, and no additions are proposed. 3350 - Mechanical Maintenance The Mechanical Maintenance Division includes 70 authorized positions. This Division is responsible for maintaining a wide variety of mechanical equipment throughout the two treatment plants, including stationary engines, pumps, hydraulic systems and belt filter presses, as well as the vehicle fleet and the portable/emergency equipment. One Mechanical Assistant ($1 ,645 - $2,048) position should be deleted as unneeded because of current work requirements. 3360 - Electrical Maintenance The Electrical Maintenance Division is responsible for all electrical equipment including motors, switchgear, lights, pumps, substations and cabling within the plants and at the pump stations. Twenty-six positions are authorized within the Division. No changes are proposed. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes �+ Page 6 April 15, 1993 3370 - Instrumentation Maintenance Division 3370, which has 31 authorized positions, is responsible for the installation, maintenance and repair of thousands of meters, controls, programmable logic controllers, transmitters and other instrumentation throughout the plants and at outlying pump stations. These components provide vital information for monitoring plant processes to help ensure that they are operating properly and that the Districts comply with our ocean discharge and air quality emissions requirements. Two additional Instrumentation Tech II ($3,208 - $4,007) positions are .. proposed to develop preventive and corrective maintenance programs for the many new variable frequency drive (VFD) units now installed. Two Instrumentation Maintenance Worker ($2,481 - $3,089) positions are required to provide for manpower reassignments to Distributed Control Facilities. 3380 - Plant Operations V� The 124 authorized positions in the Plant Operations Division are responsible for operating the sewage treatment and disposal processes at both plants and for meeting the Districts' NPDES ocean discharge permit requirements. These responsibilities require staffing at the plants 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Approximately 75% of the time this is the only Division with staff on site. A 60 MGD primary treatment expansion at Plant No. 1 was activated ' this year, and the Central Power Generation Facilities for both plants are projected to come on line during the next fiscal year. These generating facilities will provide electrical power to run the Plants. By changing the Operations' shift schedule, the Operations Division has been able to more efficiently allocate its staffing resulting in no �+ additional position requests even with the added responsibilities. Because of the increased administrative personnel and technical ' responsibilities within this Division, the creation of two Senior Operations Supervisors ($4,495 - $6,361) positions and the deletion of two Operations Supervisors ($4,080 - $5,775) positions is proposed. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes Page 7 April 15, 1993 —' TECHNICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT The Technical Services Department is responsible for the Districts' industrial toxics source control program; the conservation, recycling and reuse program; laboratory testing and analysis of samples to monitor treatment .. plant processes and industrial discharges; regulatory compliance with environmental standards; administration of the $2 million per year ocean monitoring program; and the Districts' liaison efforts on a wide variety of air, land and water laws and regulations which govern our operations. There are currently 127 authorized positions in six Divisions. 3510 - Director of Technical Services The Director of Technical Services' office is responsible for maintaining agency-wide coordination and effective responsiveness in the rapidly changing and growing regulatory arena. There are nine authorized positions in this office. The transfer of one Intern ($16/hr. max.) position from the Director of ti Operations and Maintenance office is proposed in order to more effectively allocate the Intern positions. 3520 - Comoliance The Compliance Division consists of 12 full-time staff and utilizes several consultants in their quality assurance/quality control section and the marine monitoring/marine science section. No changes are proposed for this Division. 3530 - Conservation. Reclamation and Reuse Division The Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Division is responsible for the Districts' water conservation program both within the plants and within the community, wastewater recycling and beneficial reuse of sludge. There are currently six full time positions in this Division. The creation of two Project Specialist ($4,080 - $5,775) positions is proposed along with the deletion of three Principal Environmental Specialist ($3,880 - $5,490) positions in order for job titles and Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes Page 8 April 15, 1993 compensation to more closely match the nature and responsibilities of the work performed. The work of the three previous positions will be consolidated into the two new classifications. 3540 - Air Quality Management r The Air Quality Management Division was formed in 1991-92 to provide focused monitoring, administration and response to emerging federal, state and regional laws and regulations in this area. No additions to the authorized five positions are proposed. r The addition of one Senior Scientist (S4,725 - $6,685) position and the deletion of one Scientist ($4,080 - $5,775) position is proposed to r properly reflect the education, skills, experience, duties and responsibilities of the Phd. incumbent. 3580 - Laboratory The Laboratory Division performs analysis of samples from approximately 500 industrial waste permittees, from the treatment plant processes and from the ocean monitoring program, to determine compliance with regulatory requirements and the effectiveness of plant operations, and to determine any effects on public health and the environment. There are 50 positions authorized in this Division. .� An additional Scientist ($4,080 - $5,775) position is proposed to provide technical direction, guidance and methods development. One r Principal Lab and Research Analyst ($3,520 - $4,980) position is proposed to be deleted to provide partial funding for the Scientist r position. One vacant Laboratory Analyst ($2,669 - $3,324) position is also proposed to be deleted. 3590 - Source Control The 45 position Source Control Division is the front line of the Districts' program to control toxic discharges to the sewerage system to help protect our sewerage treatment operations and the r environment and to ensure our ability to comply with NPDES permit effluent requirements. Proposed Personnel and Organizational Changes Page 9 April 15, 1993 The deletion of one vacant Supervising Source Control Inspector ($3,355 - $4,745) position is proposed to reflect a reorganized structure and distribution of workload. Two additional Source Control Inspector II ($2,979 - $3,709) positions are proposed to properly reflect the nature of current work assignments. Four Source Control Inspector 1 ($2,669-$3,324) positions are proposed to be deleted to reflect the overall redistribution of work assignments herein. Three new Source Control Technician ($2,239 - $2,913) positions are requested to properly reflect the duties of two Source Control Assistant ($1 ,866 - $2,323) positions proposed to be deleted. One Part-time Assistant ($10.29/hr. max.) position is proposed to provide services required at the waste hauler disposal station. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT The four Divisions of the Engineering Department include 72 authorized positions. Additionally, five temporary construction inspectors (who receive no benefits) are currently employed and consultants are utilized to assist in construction management activities through professional services contracts. The Department is responsible for planning and managing the Districts' facilities expansion and improvement projects. The recommended new facilities in the "2020 VISION" Master Plan total $1 .48 billion over the 30 years in 1989 dollars. No changes are proposed for this Department. GGS:Ic REF:J:%W PDOCWK.MTG\PERB.BDG 4115/93 DEPARTMENTAL SUMMARY EXHIBIT A PROPOSED 1993-W PERSONNEL CHANGES A B C D E F G Currently Proposed Revised Annual Salary Dept Department/Division Authorized New Total Ms.Cast Midpoint No. Positions Positions Positions (Savings) Calc. 1 2150 GENERAL MANAGER 3 0 3 0 0 2 2160 Board Secretary 3 0 3 0 0 ! 3 2170 Management Support 8 0 8 0 0 4 2180 Personnal/Security/Safety 24 0 24 O 0 5 Subtotal 38 0 38 O 0 6 2210 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 3 0 3 O 0 7 2220 Ac0.0unung 19 0 19 O 0 8 2230 Purchasing&WereMuse 18 0 18 (11,5081 (10,340) _ 9 2240 Information Systems 20 0 20 0 0 10 Subtotal 60 0 60 01.508) (10,340) 11 3310 DIR. OF OPERAND MA/NT 28 (1) 27 (9,324) (8,377) 12 3330 Plant Maintenance SS (1) 57 (561940) (51.158) 13 3340 Collection Facilities 31 0 31 0 0 14 3350 Mechanical Maintenance 70 111 69 (24.576) (22.080) 15 33W Electrical Maintenance 26 0 26 0 0 15 3370 Instrumentation 31 4 35 170,304 153,010 17 3380 Plant Operations 124 0 124 14,064 12,636 18 Subtotal 368 1 369 93,528 84,030 19 3510 DIR. OF TECHNICAL SERVICES 9 1 10 16,644 14,954 20 3520 Compliance 12 0 12 0 0 21 3630 Conservation, Recl&Rates 6 (1) 5 (59,0401 (53,04q 22 3540 Air Quality Management 5 0 5 10,920 9.811 23 3680 Laboratory 50 (1) 49 (30,348) (27.266) 24 3590 Source Control 45 (1) 44 (62,9281 (56,5381 25 Subtotal 127 (2) 125 (124,7521 (112,0831 26 3710 DIR. OF ENGINEERING 10 0 10 0 0 27 3720 Planning&Design 28 0 28 0 0 28 3790 Construction Management 34 0 34 0 0 29 Subtotal 72 0 72 O 0 30 TOTAL 665 (1) 664 (42,732) (38,393) MIDPTSUM.XLS 1:06 PM PROPOSED PERSONNEL CHANGES EXHIBIT B 4115/93 By POS/7/ON CLASSIFICATION 19"-94 A B C D E F Maximum Current Proposed Proposed Annual Salary No. Classification Auth Add of Auth Cost Midpoint (Savings) Calculation 1 2150 Genera/Menaoar's Ofrce 2 No Change. Proposed 3 2160 Spend Sacratav, 4 No Changes Proposed 5 2170 Manaoament Su000rt 6 No Changes Proposed 7 2180 Persormw/Se{erv/Secunty 8 No Change.Proposed 9 2210 Director of Fnance's Office 10 No Changes Proposed 11 2220 Accauntina®Rayanue 12 No Chen9ec Proposed 13 2230 Purchasina/Yt6rehousina 14 Supervising Buyer 1 1 (62,820) (55,441) 15 Buyer 2 1 3 46.920 42.155 16 Secretary 1 1 35,928 32,280 17 Senior Clerk 3 1 2 (31,536) (28.334) 1/ 18 Subtotal 6 2 2 6 (11,508) (10,340) 19 2240 lnformarion Services 20 No Changes Proposed 21 3310 Directorof Ooarand Maintenance 22 Compliance Supervisor 1 1 80.220 72.074 23 Scientist 1 1 69,300 62,263 24 Prin.Envinmmi ntal Specialist 1 1 (65,880) (59.190) 25 Engineer 4 1 3 (76,320) (68,570) 26 Intern 9 1 e (16,644) (14.954) 27 Subtotal 14 2 3 13 (9,324) (8,377) 28 3330 Plant Maintenance 29 Foremen 5 1 4 (56.940) (51.158) 30 Subtotal 5 1 4 156.940) (51,158) 31 33Q Collection Facilities 32 No Change. Proposed 33 33W Mechanise/Maintenance 34 Mechanical Assistant 1 1 (24,576) (22,0801 35 Subtotal 1 1 (24,576) (22,0801 36 33W Electrical Maintenance 37 No Changes Proposed I MIDPTDET.%LS 1:07 PM 1 PROPOSED PERSONNEL CHANCES EXHIBIT B 4115/93 BY POST/ON CLASS/FICAT/ON ass 1993-W A B C D E F Maximum FA.'Ih amPfoP ..d Proposed Annual Salary No. Classification Add Delete Auth Cost Midpoint liming.) Calculation ✓• 38 3370 Instrumentation 39 Instrumentation Tech II 11 2 13 96,168 86,402 40 Instrumentation Meint.Worker 3 2 5 74,136 66,608 r 41 Subtotal 14 4 18 170,304 153,010 42 3380 Pant Operations 43 Senior Operations Supervisor 2 2 152.664 137,161 ass 44 Operations Supervisor 17 2 15 (138.600) 4124,526) 45 Subtotal 17 2 2 17F114,064 12,63546 3510 Director of Tech Seices'Office ass 47 Intern 6 1 7 14,954 48 Subtotal 6 1 7 14,954 49 3520 Compliance er.50 No Change.Proposed 51 3530 Conservehon Recl&Reuse52 Principal En Won.Specialist 3 3 1177,570) 53 Project Specialist 2 2 138,600 124,526 54 Subtotal 3 2 3 2 (59,040) (53,044) _ 55 3540 Air Ouallfv Managament 56 Scientist [26 1 (69,300) (62,2631 57 Senior Scientist 1 1 80,220 72,074 58 Subtotal 1 1 1 10,920 9,811 59 3580 Laborersass 60 Scientist 1 5 69,300 62,263 61 Pdn Lab&Research Analyst 1 8 (59.760) (53,892) 62 Laboratory Analyst 1 12 (39,888) (35,837) 63 Subtotal 1 2 25 (30,348) (27,266) `a 64 3590 Source Con65 Supervising SC Inspector 1 2 (56,940) (51,158) ee 66 Source Control Inspector II 2 13 89,016 79,977 67 Source Control Inspector I 4 1 (159,552) (143,350) 68 Source Control Technicians 3 3 104,868 94,219 ti69 Source Control A..istents 2 (55,752) (50,091) 70 Pen Time Assistant 1 1 15.432 13,865 71 Subtotal 6 7 20 (62.928) (56,538) 72 3710 Director of Engineering's OKce 73 No Change.Proposed be 74 3720 P/ennino&Desian 75 No Change.Proposed 76 3790 Construction Management 77 No Changes Proposed 78 TOTAL KI 21 22 113 (42,7321 (38,393) _ MIDPTDET.XLS 1:07 PM 2 COUNTY SANITATION DI 1 nICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY PAGE 1 SUMMARY ORGANIZATIONAL CHART 103-94 PROPOSED Boegoe DI OAR ECLOR! LVECMM 9pE0. COYKfiEL COMMIrtEEB xi NN.E O . MRHROEq KCV OifgE 011ltf COYHB6 fOWO CMlff KCY OIREC)Oq OEXEML BICY RDMIN OON Of CO UN86 •BN— IERBONNEl BVPPoRi F.I.IL BfXIOR AINCIIRL MEM)M BR . BECUROY IER90XX pp YIN RO bN BVW 9upCRV19pR .VBICi1M /.BBM)1M M4M0ln OEfMBOH PROEC OC)MBOXP. .f M b! Ix WJMINMTE 9lRNCCB .IREC)OR OIREC)On Of OIgEG)Oq Of DWEQOq Oi OPEM)IO NCt iEC NHICK 04 FIN I! Mq MENYiCE KRVICEB ENOIN LLRIND m e e m zo z ) e B N ECU aulPDn) BECY IWNHMCR OIN Of BECV IM ERHB ! NJWfR pROf BEOY IHiERNB BECY tM RHB IB LO IB Ve 6) 41 b x f! IC 0 PL 4 f X qEV BVCB WMK OPEq MIC[ IeC REOYCLIBRIVBE COMRM OV41)Y IHING. WM) COMPOLLIRDfi.LL90N IA0li M.W/.OIR JL NAX.LOlR f1CAlilEp OIiIIB OM I.W!)I MLM ER fI.00.1)IEpRB ON RM ERE RCCVCLE B0.CRnC OC)eIB ON peOE PoMRe IMHb LR M.WROIR OL)IAB ON p,Yp! eM.Vlg06P PAGE 1993-DO eA W ER 0 • 3 N L Cµ OFF. COUM86 onnin ER00NNEL 1. Fes bVeMR! oFIKE L. u v xx WxebER PERWNNU 1 ♦ R CO UxeEt ne on eD.RD or Dw Denou nN a.o I ]eRe AAel DERury eECREi.wv 6oMD bfc, io Ox FIA xRER1=f. V A.i 9EC REgRV OECREixRV Al.4DE Iypx MiF1. 3]N nee. D 3Ne ERA • AFN CIERe uDE CIERx CIERx IMFN IMF tt ERa CIERx IMF D >'J% IMF D 'AY Ass cu.RD ses Asse IOF• IeN ININ efNKEa N IN IN I OF DPE RxTO N9l MNICN Of � FMNCE 11NiE MCXC 6fRVltEb EMOINEERIN ON PME] OM PIAE• HI/Af 13 OM RMEIO � 'To be determined by Board DI Directors rlxRxE[ PAGE 3 EerRRneM 1BB3-B4 m of`ecioRa lxxxc! 1 � m n IG ELCRIC4 , NIORWTON EIHIHLE 1 .L000I M NY PVRCIXO AND OREVENVC ..E..3C FEN N.W ER COMROLLCR ryGp � MWVMINO REVINU! YCOVMIIp 4NIYGR M16 BORWRRC INEOR N1110X ON X BNfCLLLIaf RYIC C99VC I 1 I IIMO OINIPIL 4X] � Nb FEEY9R8 PRI ___ NCIRK RINCIRY RR INCIR4 COUNLM RCCOVMYi YCOYNLPM pgCO M44CR INTO 6ERV AIN INIO BEEF ..1. Nvai ae RViECx NR ]ln G]@ ]i]] PER GEXIOR 1CCOVMLM GR END I'll_ —TOOK O FNRCNOV9! 9e NIOR OO PMNER MX BOB BUYER; 1]f! INIO ME 1. L]]9 iecx n am f ] YCOUMPM N.E. fnc f.. N »IE xxplRx axw ELIc I fru COORDINATOR EeEC fp Yum eecnflYr NEaXEe INIo—. CC�E ]11 wlO MI aTEDN.E4N TCcnxRux 11 o lc m INTO nxa TECxxauxl ORYNIC] 0 TIC. aFC nflenv N!f X RCR ETYv K.PCCTO BR.YCTO W.RCCTO 0]]P 0 ]N1 AGP 1 NN CLIRM CLERK CLIRX RAJ. OMG Y] LYl "ONEMlI PCR _ 0!Y PCCOUMNO PCC.UNNNO YCOUMIHO 9CNIOR CLERK CLIRa CLCRX CLERK ONr MGI I A W]r ' IOYr CLERKNBKF ttIRN 0 fN I%fI N cRfBXlIIINO � Y91CfYR T Y91 I]JIINn IO EWxR o RATH)Nsa PAGE YNMFx.WLE 1933-90 >m pRELTOROF OPEP 6 YTLE t PdW 1. 319 ASST OIR OF —g qR OF OPEMTIONS M Iff Na 1 BSfiS t 9W5 PLANT OPER Ifi L S 6 F �9 5) N fi9 3fi 35 Soli PW.2 CEGE. tEpl PLANT CFLLLFFI Ox NOt NO3 iMININp GEN ttERIGI IMEfWS SUPPpiT YAINTENw11LE FMALNIES MECNM11dl ELELTPoGL INSTRUMENT CHIEF LNIEF TfWNINO Fwtt MMIN IMERNS SR FwCL FMA FPLL FwLL FwCL OPEMTOR OPEMTpi sUPVR MOR $ELV ENGR YGR NGfl MOR YOfl MGR OETNLS ON PwGE6 OM SON PPUES CETNL50N PAOE) OPERATIONSL PAGES MAINTENANCE 1993-94 ]59 IR C OR O OPER 6 MTCE 1 8800 25 219 A5 ASZTOIHOF OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE 8895 3855 A 8 ] e B to H CLERICAL INTERNS SUPPORT IN IN SUPV 7. JIANK`Ih SUPV 1 ' am ENGINEER M G N Y 3 PREPAR COORD I 9390 mO NI 1� ASISOCIATE ENGINEER III 5715 Sa90 IN ENGINEER II SECY I 1 A]i5 105113 3A19 ENGINEER AIDE II 1 O90G 3301 NTERNS SECRETARY B N N t 1800/Hfl MAX AIDEI 1059A 2994 O 1059 29]3 SE IOR CLERK 2 1058F H29 CLERK 2 lOSAF 2358 OPERATIONS& PAUE6 MAINTENANCE 1993-94 369 I OR F OPER&MTCE 25 219 24 ` A S DI O AS L I AIIIN E NS OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE &TECH SUPPORT 1 8665 8805 _ AIL N A ] AIL N A 5 124 ANT OPERATIONS 48 58 e 4 LAN ILANIRAINING N AL NO.1 NO GENERATION CHIEF CHIEF OPERATOR OPERATOR 1 1 ]015 ]01$ SENIOR SENIOR OPER SUPV OPER SUPV 1 1 6360 6360 FAC MANAGER 1 6685 OPERATIONS OP RATIONS OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR 5]]5 5T]5 5TI5 SUPERVISOR _ 1 EMAN 5 90 1 4745 SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR UM POWER PLANT OPER PLANT OPER PLANT OPER OPERATOR 11 15 2 11 2061D 3872 N61D 3872 2051D 3072 2061D 307 PLAN PLANT LAN OPER OPER OPER 20 29 0 2058 33T/ 2059 33)] 2058 33)] P RA OPERATORO RATOR ' IN TRAINING IN TRAINING IN TRAINING 0 0 J 2055L 2]88 2055C 27M 2059 2)BB v ON L N ER CLERK 5 nuo 2839 HELPER 0 2049G 2048 ROILERKHR WREWER r W.�MEN.ME rRuea teas-w OiREC10R i YYxfExugE M L � uwiOFR� iµYXE9uw.OER iK uwKrEP uRWOER igPxi uiCER uECruxc4 C N 61RuuEM.igx WS EEES Y95 w OEiµ90x NOE] OET490x VNE9 OA490xIKE�R DAYSOx IK.En CELLERgxiK fl¢O WIEPNp 3 sm ioiuuix z •Wun6fRgx5 UNE I..,. LMtO i. _ zmo z n.z p1ECigN WCgyfCMx i n rK woxuR K ERxE zmx zmx zoer <OLLEC1gNiK � n O wORnERnK ]E6�E 1 ]WSE , ]Btt COLLERgxiK CttlECigXiµ WORXER� wORRERi `� yM- x 19Kr 1 SM I I 1 1 I 1 1 ! 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 PAGE 1 l EOB3-BC YYxIFNYIt! al Ii DIROI uuMEMµ10E ' MA !r it N n A IN YDR I}{Y]R IIC YDR FAC NDR I.K NON qAM MCE CCLLfCIIDN MCCINNKµ 6ECiRltµ MRRVMEM I 1 1 1 1 NA N6 <LA NA !CA DE14iOM DLELLiON OEr480N DFr4OON II-0Er PtlE• PIOl 11 R.Wrx01 1NOM P q.WfNO] A MECX.WICµ NCCX.LXICµ YECM.VI iIELD WPIRY f16D WPlNV FIRD WPERV srn sm FOREYW ION. 1 UU 1 UU NYWRY ILCDNOMY OWRCO DEWN}EAIM REOYLD N60M MUYNY i ON0. v OODRCD .. OEWATERING ILLD V/L LEAO 1. 1. 1. LFb LfM LEAD L}IO LEM YCCNWIC YK'NWK Y[CNYN: YECIYNK Y!<X.LMC YICMWK YECXLNK ME<NMK MfCx c YCCNNIK 1 MIDI AR AIIOI An ni1D An i0}IOI An CNOI bn MIOI bR MIDI bn ML1D1 bn ALI01 AlI %NOI An ENID1 b]3 xD»o ala DMD YECMW 91.YECN.WK WE YECM.WK MEC uEC wRDEN MEC M.VI eR uECX4 M.YECMNI uECN.LxK BR YECMNNIC YFC xHN AI! AlR AI! MTI AI! MM AIL AEif MN AI! IPYEM 'A!N bIL MM bli 'IIMI AIL MEI AI! aObf AI! OPfNN}OR A!Y!J NN NECM.INK MECXI.XK MECNAHK YLCMMI ECX.W NCCXNXIC MICMNIIC MfCMX MttNMIK MLC M.WIC NfCX.LXK 3 }Oab ]Ma 301EO iFl MM YA MM iDl! SJEEO JNi MN IM lOYO r[n ]MO AA Mtl aCA ]AN IIO! }AN aCN VE141 Wf FA�t 10 NO ll�.1. �AW NO 2 ELECT.Ol �ECTTEO. I,ECTT.. c a, T,'Il ILEOTIO ELECTR� MECTRK� IEC.R TICHPI 1.Nll 2 4M 4W MECTRIC� ELI.lc� TIC.I TEO.P I .TRI. ..,C� NTOR....� NTCE�RKER oIMA MIA MO MIA MIR TECHNICAL PAGE 12 SERVICES 1993-94 125 DIRECTOROF V TECH SERVICES 1 990 2 T CLERICAL INTERNS PIT INTERNS T _ ADMINISTRATIVE 18.00/HR MAX SECRETARY 1 1051D 3238 SENIOR CLERK 1 � 10%F 2E91 CLERK 0 105CF 22J2 �'� 12 5 5 49 AA COMPLIANCE CONSERVATION, AIR LABORATORY SOURCE RECYCLE B REUSE QUALITY CONTROL COMPLIANCE CONSERV.RECYCLE AIROUALITY LABORATORY bOURCE CTRL _ MANAGER BREUSE MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER 1 1 1 1 1 8115 73W 73B0 8115 8115 DETAILS ON DETAILSON DETAILSON DETAILSON DETAILS ON PAGE 13 PAGE 14 PAGE 17 PAGE 15 PAGE 16 TELHNICNL- PAGE 13 SERVICES ING-94 Izs pRECTOP OF TECH BEMILES t hM B 5 6 R OB M CLERICAL CONSER"TON. AIROUµ" COMPURNCE IABORATORV SOURCE &INTERNS RECYCLE BNEUSE MANAGEMENT CONTROL CONBEM.RECYCLE AIR QUALITY COMPLIANCE LABOMTOPV HOVPLE LTPL IPEUSE MANNER MANApEP MANAGER MPNAOER MNIAOEP ]]W ]9!0 Nib CI t6 p116 DETARSON DETAILS ON OETAILB ON OETAILB ON OETNLS OH PAGE tx PApE v PApE I] PME 16 PMiE IB 0 6 S REGULATORY URAJ�ASSURANCE MMITORIN 0.ERIVL OVEPSIOHi A98UPANCE MONITORING SENIOR COMPLMNCE SCIENTIST SUPERVISOR 1 Y05 BN6 ENGINEER 0 ABO L PRINCIPAL PRRCPµ ABSOLUTE ENNR SPEC ENVIRSPEC ENGINEER IN I I 60BJ MBO 6fBB SENIOR SENIOR ENVIR SPEC ENVIR SPEC f OB63 t 4B1x I.m I A'Lx ENVIR 9PEC II ENNR SPEC II 0 t00SG t 'LBI 10L0p 00N ENVIRBPECI I SECRETARY toot OxN' � 106W t SENIOR CLEW 1090F t =0 _ CIEWt 0 IONF x368 TECHNICAL PAGE 14 SERVICES 1993-M 1. _ DIRECTOROF TECH SERVICES I WW e t2 E e M CLERICAL COMPLIANCE AIROUALITY CONSERVATION. LABORATORY SOURCE _ &INTERNS MANAGEMENT RECYCLE A REUSE CONTROL COMPLIANCE AIROUA T' CONSERV..RECYCLE LASORAY. SOURCECTRL _ MANAGER MANAGER &PEUBE MANAGER MANAOM MANAGER 9115 ]989 YYO 9tt5 9116 DETAILSON DETALS ON DETALS ON DETAILS ON DETAILS ON PAGE 12 PASS 19 PAGE IT PAGE t5 PAGE 18 CONSERVATION SIOSOUDS RECYCLE REUSE PROECT PROJECT SPECIALIST SPECIALIST t 6T16 t 6T16 ENVIfl SPEC II t999Gt y91 SfCPETMY � 1 t O69A 2WC a TECHNICAL PAGE 16 SERVICES 1993-94 1]b DIPECTOROF TECX 9ERVICE3 I 99W CLERICAL COMPLIANCE LABORATORY CONSERVATION. AIR L. SOURCE A INTERNS RECYCLE&MUSE MANAGEMENT CONTROL COMPLIANCE IABOMTOflV LONSERV.RECYCLE AIR OVALT' BOVRCE CTgL MANAGER MANAGER 6 REUSE MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER I 1 ails ills 79W TOW 6116 DETAI-SON DETAIL9ON DETAILS ON DETAILS ON DETAIL9ON PAGEIB PAGED PAGE a PAGE I> PAGE IS MOLECULAR INORGANIC QUALITY MARINE ORGANIC VIROLOGY BIOLOGY CHEMISTRY ASSURANCE MONITORING CHEMISTRY BACTERIOLOGY SENIOR LAB SECTION LAB SECTION LAB SECTION SCIENTIST SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERNSOR I I I Slow SHE .5 was SCIENTIST SCIENTIST SCIENTIST SCIENTIST SCIENTIST I 5775 6776 6776 6]]6 sns PRINC LA&P9gCH PRINC LABIR9PCH PRINC LABIP^aRCH PRINC IABINSRLN PRINO"e"UNRCM PRINC UBI113RLX ANALYST ANALYST ANALYST ANALYST ANALYST ANALYST 1 B 1 1 LWO 4030 4W0 4930 4060 4BB0 SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR SENIOR LAB ANALYST _.AN_,: LABAIMLYST LASANALYST LAB ANALYST LABANALYST ] B 8 ] IOWO ]6BI IOWG NBI 1003G YBt IOWG =01 IOWG ]B01 IOWG no, LAB ANKVSi LABANALYST 9 0 tOSt SON NNN 0]N SECRETARY LAB � t TECH 1050A 09N 0 1066E 'AD CLEW. 1 HELPER IONF m 0 1]]]IHR � P? ABBISTANf 10.3NXR TECHNICAL PAGE 16 MHACES 1983-BG tY6 DIRECIIXiOF TECH 9EfMfES t 9SW 0 4 M fi 6 40 CLERICAL COMPLANCE SOURCE CONSERVATION. AIR OUAUTY LAGORATORY B INTERNS CONTROL RECLAM 6PEUSE MANAGEMENT r COMPLIANCE SOUHCE CTHL CONSEHV,RECLAM AIfl OWLLT' LABOMTORV NANAGER MANAGEfl SREUBE MANAGER MNiAOEfl MANAOEH 1 1 � t Bnb 1 0f 15 YdW ]YO Btlb DETAILS ON DETAILS ON DETAILS ON OETAIL60N GETAIL6 ON PAGE IR PAGE tS PACE 10 PACE ti PACE 16 2t M ENFORCEMENT PEPYfIS SPECIAL PROJECTS r ENOINEERINO SUPERVISOR ENGINEER ENGINEER I I r meo WW SOUP.CEONTRL r SUPERNEDR ASS..TE PR PAL EHOINEERIII EINIR SPEC bJ)b fi 1 Slpp bOW su S ASSOCIATE SCINSP ENGINEER II 3 a>a5 a]a5 1�1 ASSCCNTE ENOINEERI 3 a]Ob r BC MPII tOW 9)OB r SC MPI I IN, 3 SCTECH B IObOE 80]I r SECRETARY t0. 1 20P1 SR CLERK IOWF RSPB Pf 0.43f SIO.]LHR MAX TECHNICAL PAGE 19 SERVICES 1E93-94 � 126 OIREC)011 OF TECH SERVICES t � KW B 12 6 6 aB M CLERICAL COMPLIANCE CONSERVATION, Nfl QUALITY LABORATORY SOURCE \INTERNS RECYCLE REUSE MANAGEMENT CONTROL COMPLIANCE NSERV,RECYCLE MR OUALITY LABORATORY —RCECTILL NANAO.. \flEUSE MAXAOEfl MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER I Attb ]YS )YO SI16 pttb OEfNLS ON DETAILS ON DETAILS ON OETAILSON DETAILS ON PAGE 12 PAOE 12 PAGE 10 PAGE 16 PASS 1p _ 1 CLERICAL RULES ASSESMT PERMIT RESEARCH A t &PLANNING ADMIN SPEC PRQI SENIOR SCIENTIST 1 Sw6 ENGINEER ENGINEER I SM0 NA ASBOC ABSOC PRINCIPAL ENGINEER III ENOINEERIII ENVIRSPEC o B B wBo waB wpo SECRETARY IBSBA 26Bp ENOINEEWNO YAUG 18 rz )GaP-as OIRECTOR OF FNpINEERINO � t BBPo 8 8 PB CLERICAL INTERNS PLANNINGCONBTRUCTIC 6 DESIGN MANAGEMENi� ENGINEERING OE)AILS ON � MAHLOEP PAGE tB I 0116 B R TREATMENT COLL SYSTEMS ELECTRICAL OFFICE NPOUHT' ENSA PLANTS APERMITS 81NSTR ENGINEERING ADRAANOS REVIM _ ENGINEERING ENGINEERING SUPEPVI8OP BU PE. VIBOP ]]80 )YO � SENIOR ENOINEEfl I ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER B 1'W AtPo SM 8]EO PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL ENGP A99OL ENGP AM. ENOR ASSOC _ 6)>6 I 5]]e 5]]5 A99OCNTE ASSOCIATE ENGINEEPIII ENOINEER111 B WPo EfPo Bfl ENGP SRENOP A93OCIATE A89OCIATE ENGINEERING t t ASSOCIATE ICB]S 4800 t08]B pON 105D 42M SENIOR 9ENIGP ENOP AIDE ENGP AIDE IMF WBE IOBfF bB1 ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENpINEEPINp NOE III NI EIII AIDE III AIDE III I o 0 tCRE MM IO@E MN t00EE I 8pI tCp2E 8d0 ADMINISTRATIVE SECRETARY ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING EE ENOINflING I PR AIDE II 1080G AIDE II plOE 11 AIOE1II IOOID .16 IMEPNB 0 0 ] tpCOO I ]]01 IORG G201 IOMG BBO1 3'Slt � IB.COINP MA% SECRETARY ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ] I I AI Al NOEI 1059P Ail I 1068 EBY! 1068 2B70 tO6B nYJ � SENIOfl CLEPo( AIR 2 1008E 3038 CLEPA 0 I051F YIEB PR A93f IO.AIMP pn ENGINEEFINO - PAGE 10 OEPAIRMENi 1B83-YC rz DIRECTOR OF ENGINEEWNG I KN 2 }e y _ S.FFOL PLANNING CONAGEMENT d SVPPORl d0E51ON MANApEMENi T T DE*AILs GN v,LaE Ie coFlsrRGcnoN MANAGED ells _ n INSPECTION CONTRACT I' ADMIN E LIWST.L NO., PWIL e INSTR NO.1 H0,2 ENOINEEPoNp ENGINEERING SVPEWSOR SVPE7O0A 1 TJIG )]50 M.WOFI SENIOR �' ENGIN EEP ENGINE EP 1 )O16 ' )016 ENGINEER ENGINEER CHIEF CONST eY0 16b0 HSPECTOP sPVp CONST $PJO CONST $PVC CON Si PRINC ENGR PWNC ENGP EC R INSPECTOR INSPTOR INSPECTO A7 A$$CC 0 0 sns sns sns sns sns ASSOCITE ASSOCIATE ASSOCIATE ENGINEER111 ENGINEER III ENGINEER IN 0 0 0 SSW LW YW $RCONST SR COIST SRCONST INSPECTOR INSPECTOR INSPECTOR I peH: ue] 1pMC uB] IOBeC N6t CONST CONST CONST INSPECTOR INSPECTOR IN SPECTON ] IF F AOe2 1., A WB2 1. • 40e2 PR CONST RASP AN ENGR AIDE III 2e..R MAX 2 IOe2E b ASST CONST INSP _ 0 IOe2G ]$b ENGR AIDE II ENGP NDE II ENGR AI DfI IOSOG I .1 IOEOO SWI P,A$$T 0 IOSS An IO.AMfl MA% r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JOINT WORKS r OPERATING BUDGETS r Z��pt`Op p\STRICTS pp 94HCF O C 0 0 U Y b r < yb r p THE ENVIRONME� r r r 1993-1994 FISCAL YEAR r i r JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET REVIEW & SUMMARY COMPARISON OF BUDGETED & ACTUAL EXPENDITURES & ESTIMATED CARRY-OVER SCHEDULE I FISCAL YEAR 1993.94 5/12/93 (A) (B) IC) (D) (E) (F) IG) Budget Recommended Increase Expenditures Estimated Increase Est'd Carry- Description 1992-93 Budget or 1991-92 Expenditures or Over to Fiscal 1993-94 (Decrease) 1992-93 (Decrease) Year 1993-94 1 Net Salaries, Wages & Benefits $23,899,000 $26,170,000 $2,271,000 $21,629,000 $23,105,000 $1,476,000 $794,000 2 Odor Control & Chemical Coagulants 4,480,000 4,154,000 (326,000) 3,145,000 3,856,000 711,000 624,000 3 Contractual Services 7,373,000 6,702,000 (671,000) 7,248,000 6,845,000 (403,000) 528,000 4 Professional Services 1,226,000 904,000 (322,000) 945,000 830,000 1115,000) 396,000 5 Equipment Charges 235,000 235,000 224,000 210,000 (14,000) 25,000 6 Repair & Maintenance Material & Services 3,844,000 3,870,000 26,000 3,014,000 3,600,000 586,000 244,000 7 Research & Monitoring 2,906,000 3,431,000 526,000 2,305,000 2,300,000 (510001 606,000 8 Utilities 4,422,000 3,650,000 (772,000) 5,071,000 6,427,000 1,356,000 (2,005,000) 9 Other Materials, Supplies, Outside Services & Offsets 3,763,000 3,963,000 200,000 3,071,000 3,584,000 513,000 179,000 10 Total Joint Operating Expenses $52,148,000 $53,079,000 $931,000 $46,652,000 $50,757,D00 $4,105,000 $1,391,000 11 Revenue and Offsets 3,500,000 3,500,000 3,569,000 3,000,000 (569,000) 500,000 12 Net Joint Operating $48,648,000 $49,579,000 1 $931,000 $43,083,000 $47,757,000 $4,674,000 $891,000 JOSCHDI.XLS 5/12/93 9:25 AM SCHEDULE I I l [ [ [ [ J t It t l ( 1 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS SCHEDULE II JOINT OPERATING FUND 5/27/93 Fiscal Year 1993-94 ALLOCATION OF JOINT OPERATING EXPENDITURES IAI (B) ICI (D) IEI IF) IGI (H) 11) (J) Gallonage Flows 1993-94 Funding 1992-93 Comparison 1992-93 Projected 1993-94 Projected District Projected Increase Budgeted Percent Budgeted Projected Required Actual Budgeted No. Actual Flow (Decrease) Flow of Total Contribution Carryover Funding Contribution Contribution 1 8,233.01 MG 330.79 MG 8,563.80 MG 9.58% $ 4,748,000 $ 85,000 $ 4,663,000 $ 4,564,000 $ 4,675,000 2 27,354.54 1,095.36 28,449.90 31.82% 15,774,000 284,000 15,490,000 $ 15,165,000 $ 15,789,000 3 27,622.48 1,107.62 28,730.10 32.13% 15,929,000 286,000 15,643,000 $ 15,313,000 $ 16,668,000 5 2,814.62 109.18 2,923.80 3.27% 1,621,000 29,000 1,592,000 $ 1,560,000 6 1,785,000 6 4,454.61 177.59 4,632.20 5.18% 2,568,000 46,000 2,522,000 $ 2,470,000 $ 2,573,000 7 6,545.73 236.87 6,782.60 7.58% 3,761,000 68,000 3,693,000 $ 3,629,000 $ 2,798,000 11 5,529.66 223.64 5,753.30 6.43% 3,190,000 57,000 3,133,000 $ 3,066,000 $ 2,809,000 13 782.21 15.57 797.78 0.89% 442,000 8,000 434,000 $ 434,000 $ 429,000 14 2,806.54 118.54) 2,788.00 3.12% 1,546,000 28,000 1,518,000 $ 1,556,000 $ 1,122,000 TOTALS 1 86,143.40 MG 3,278.08 MG 89,421.48 MG 100% 11 $ 49,579,000 $ 891,000 $ 48,688,000 S 47,757,000 $ 48,648,000 JOSCHDII.XLS 5/27/93 1:53 PM SCHEDULE 11 JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE Is JOINT OPERATING &WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 5112193 r 1993-94 FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1992-93 1993-94 ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND / SALARIES&WAGES 20,417,159 24,359.445 25,673,000 27.043,000 30.053,000 (a) r 2. RETIREMENT 2,690,735 3,005.424 1.813,000 3.050,000 2.044,000 (a) 3. WORKERS COMP 155.001 172.431 225,000 225,000 225,000 (a) _ 4. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 21,848 28,164 71.000 65.000 75.000 (e) S. GROUPINSURANCE 2,410,334 2.332,471 3.660,000 2.166,000 3,873.000 (a) r 6. UNIFORM RENTAL 78,300 75,096 75,000 1001000 100,000 (a) 7. TOTAL BENEFITS 5,356,218 5,613,586 5.844,000 5,508,000 6,317,000 1.) r 8. SALARIES,WAGES,&BENEFITS 25,773,377 29,973,031 32,517,000 32,649,000 36,370,000 _ S. DIRECT CHARGES-CORFIDIST (3,314,175) (4,457.187) (5,142,000) (4,800,000) (5150010001 10. COST ALLOC-CORF/DIST (2.542,166) (3,886.889) (4,270,000) - (3,950,000) (4,700,000) 11. W.O.SALARIES&BENEFITS (5,856,3411 (8,344,076) 19,412,000) (8,750.000) 110,200,000) (b) 12. NET J.O.PAYROLL 19,917,036 21,628.955 23,105,000 23.899,000 26,170,000 1.) r 13. MATERIALS,SUPPLIES,&SERVICES 14. GASOLINE, DIESEL&OIL 185.779 190,126 190,000 225,000 220,000 (6) 15. INSURANCE 585.041 675.424 1,100,000 11190.000 11165.000 1.) 16. MEMBERSHIPS 21,221 20,527 50,000 581000 581000 (U 17. OFFICE EXPENSE '4. SUPPLIES 160,256 153,781 164,000 165,000 175,000 (8) OFFICE AUTOMATION EXPENSES 0 0 60,000 0 105,000 (9) 20. OTHER 102.452 107,599 110,000 110,000 115,000 (9) r 21. OPERATING SUPPLIES 22. CHLORINE&ODOR CONTROL 1.602,466 1'"0'586 1,785,000 2,171,000 1,942,000 (h) 23. SULFIDE CONTROL 460,245 220,396 446.000 660,000 434,000 (h) r 24. CHEMICAL COAGULANTS 1,653,656 1.493.632 1,925,000 1.649,000 1,778,000 (1) 25. LAB CHEMICALS&SUPPLIES 234,467 591,766 500,000 400,000 550,000 0) r 26. TOOLS 87.057 119,151 80,000 125,000 115,O0D p1 27. SOLVENTS, PAINTS.&JAN.SUPPLIES 146,871 151,172 160.000 190,000 175,000 6) r 28. OTHER OPERATING SUPPLIES 207,022 253,558 270.000 250,000 265,000 (j) 29. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 30. GROUNDSKEEPING&JANITORIAL 47,239 48,931 60.000 80.000 2851000 (k) 31. OUTSIDE LAB SERVICES 136,267 86,937 100,000 175,000 150,000 (k) 32. SOLIDS REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL 6,320,019 6,037,0D0 5,8001000 6,110,000 5,540.000 (k) -" 33. OTHER WASTE DISPOSAL 134,238 56,693 50,000 100,000 75.000 (k) r 34. OXYGEN PLANT OPER&MTCE 364,100 445,672 460,000 468,000 490,000 (k) J OTHER 442,556 573,121 375,000 440,000 162,000 (k) r 36. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 37. GENERAL, LABOR&SPECIAL COUNSEL 629,017 443,450 600,C00 650,000 650,000 (1) yy 38. AUDIT&ACCOUNTING 41.040 36,890 70,000 56,000 60.000 (1) JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET SCHEDULE III JOINT OPERATING&WORKING CAPITAL FUNDS 5112/93 1 1993.94 FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1992-93 1993-94 ACTUAL ACTUAL PROJECTED BUDGET RECOMMEND 39. 40. OTHER EEflING 313,037 -_--179,907 --------150,000 --------- 370,000 1413,000 (1) 41. PRINTING &PUBLICATION 42. REPRO-IN-HOUSE 134,291 171,164 180,000 165,000 190,000 Iml 43. PRINTING-OUTSIDE 68,095 84,866 70,000 110,000 85,000 (ml 44. PHOTO PROCESSING 27,134 36,639 30,000 35,000 35,000 (ml 45. NOTICES&ADS 109.070 86,718 30,000 100,000 35,000 (m1 Yy 46. RENTS&LEASES 47. OUTSIDE EQUIPMENT RENTAL 93,351 97,070 90,000 110,000 110,000 (.1 48. DISTRICT EQUIPMENT RENTAL 114,393 126,567 120,000 125,000 125,000 W l 49. REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE V 50. MATERIALS 3,024,902 2,803,165 3,200,000 3,500.000 3,500,000 lal 51. CONTRACTS 147,799 211,198 400,000 344,000 370,000 10) 62. RESEARCH&MONITORING 53. ENVIRO.MONITORING 1,718,789 1,864,089 2,000.000 1,946,000 2,237,000 (p) 54. AIR QUALITY MONITORING 0 0 0 0 620.000 (p) 55. RESEARCH 302,971 440,893 300,000 960,000 574.000 (p) r 56. TRAINING, MEETINGS,&TRAVEL 139,939 - 187,796 20 .000 250,000 225,000 I41 I 57. UNCOLLECTABLE ACCOUNTS 15,157 19,354 30,000 10.000 IDIOM (r) 58. UTILITIES I 59. DIESEL FOR GENERATORS 179,828 104,727 110,000 200,000 125,000 Is) 60. POWER 4,252,327 4,514,041 5,200,000 2,473,000 1,100,000 1s) 61. NATURAL GAS 215,882 185,063 850,000 1,284,000 1,900,000 ls) 62. TELEPHONE 117,640 80,423 100,000 125,000 125,000 (s) 63. WATER 154,197 206,809 367,000 340,000 400,000 Is) L 64. OTHER EXPENSES 85. FREIGHT 36,938 38,957 40.000 45,000 45,000 (t) V 66. GENERAL&SAFETY 366,287 468,000 600,000 450,000 600,000 (U I 67. AOMD OPERATING FEES 157,138 215,603 150,000 325.000 285,000 (0 j 68. PRIOR YEARS EXPENSE 125,235 37,944 20.000 100,000 50.000 (u) (-' 69. OTHER NON-OPERATING EXPENSE 68,712 68,992 50.000 60,000 60,000 (Y) I 70. TOTAL MATL, SUPPLIES,&SERVICES 24,465,876 25,628,722 28.152,000 28,849,000 27,509,000 LI 71. COST ALLOCATION-COBF&OTHER (546,3291 (60S,457) _(5001000) (600,000) (600,000) Iw 72. NET J.O.MAT'L,SUPPLIES,&SERV 23,919,547 25,023,266 27,652,000 28,249,000 26,909.000 la) 73. REVENUE (2,147.901) (3.569,082) (3,000,000) (3,500.000) (3,500,000) (Y) L 74. NET J.O.EXPENDITURES 41.688,682 43,083,138 47,757,000 48,648,000 49,579,000 (z) r SCHEDULE IV May 13, 1992 NOTES TO JOINT OPERATING FUND BUDGET r 1993-94 FISCAL YEAR (a) Salaries. Wages & Benefits (1) Salaries & Wages - The budget projection is based on all 664 authorized permanent positions and the 36 Summer Work Program _ positions being filled as set forth in the approved personnel recommendations. The three-year MOU's approved by the Directors expire in November 1993. No provision has been made in these salary -- projections for any adjustments or benefit changes which may be approved in the upcoming meet-and-confer process. r (2) Retirement - The Districts' employees are members of the Orange County Employees Retirement System pursuant to our MOU's. The `y employer contribution rate for 1993-94 has been reduced to 7.05%, which includes 4.50% of the individual's contribution in accordance r with the meet-and-confer process in lieu of a salary adjustment. (3) Workers' Compensation - Includes total estimated expenditures for the workers' compensation program set forth in detail in the enclosed Workers' Compensation Self-Insured Fund Budget on Schedule V. An appropriation of $225,000 is recommended for 1993-94 to maintain the current level of accumulated reserves. (4) Unemployment Insurance - The Districts are on an actual claims basis r which has historically resulted in an overall lower cost because of favorable claims history. Because claims are continuing to rise, a small increase in the appropriation is recommended. .. (5) Group Medical - Includes the Districts' share of employee medical plan benefits for the prepaid HMO plans, the estimated portion of the total costs of the self-funded indemnity plan not paid for by employees, and the life and disability insurance premiums. Schedule VI details the expected costs of the self-funded plan. The recommended budget increase reflects current and past actual experience, expected cost - increases and a correction of the 1992-93 budget allocation. (6) Uniforms - This budget projection is for uniforms provided our field and — lab employees in accordance with employee MOU's. New bids were taken during 1992-93 and the current budget allocation is proposed to be continued. r r May 13, 1993 Schedule IV �r Page 2 I , (b) Cost Allocations and Direct Chargebacks to CORF and Individual Districts - , Represents direct labor and benefit chargebacks and cost allocation t0 the appropriate fund for which the work is actually performed (CORF for work on U treatment plants' capital expansion; respective Capital Facilities funds for work on individual District's collection facilities capital expansion; and Operating funds for maintenance and repair). Also reflects administrative time chargeable io to self-funded insurance programs; and Source Control Division and Laboratory Division charges to respective Districts for industrial waste monitoring and enforcement program. Ir (c) Net JO Payroll - This line item represents the net salaries, wages and benefits chargeable to Joint Operating Fund for administration, maintenance and U operation of the joint works facilities, after chargebacks to other funds for services performed by the labor pool described above. I (d) Gasoline. Oil and Fuel - This account includes gasoline, oil and diesel fuel required to operate stationary treatment plant equipment as well as approximately 300 pieces of major mobile equipment such as vehicles, cranes, U etc. (a) Insurance - Includes Board and staff out-of-county travel policy, employee fidelity bond, all-risk (earthquake and flood) policy, and boiler and machinery , policies. The major element of this account is $1,000,000 for an increased comprehensive all-risk policy. The historic $260,000 for in-lieu premiums to increase the reserve levels in the self-insured public liability fund is proposed to be redirected to this all risk program as the liability insurance reserves have `,;' been reimbursed from insurances. (f) Memberships - Districts' memberships in Association of Metropolitan Sewerage L, Agencies (AMSA), California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA), Santa Ana River Flood Protection Agency (SARFPA), Long Beach Safety Council, L WaterReuse, Southern California Association of POTW's (SCAP), and Western Coalition of Arid States (WESTCAS). (g) Office Expense - This account includes supplies, forms, small office equipment, L software, drafting materials; technical journals and postage for all departments. The office automation expenses were budgeted under the category of Other l ' General Expenses for 1992-93 and exclude computer systems which are capitalized. (h) Chlorine & Odor Control Chemicals - The Districts currently use chlorine and sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) as primary odor control chemicals in the treatment plants. Usage of chlorine is expected to decrease from 1992-93 L levels of use, but unit prices are budgeted to increase at the next bid date. Caustic soda is used in the foul air scrubbers at both plants. Use has U .. May 13, 1993 Schedule IV Page 3 stabilized, but prices are expected to continue to increase. Caustic soda is also added to Districts' trunklines to control hydrogen sulfide in the lines, and a .+ portion of that cost has been added to the chemical budget for the Joint Works' share of this expense for the in-plant odor control benefits. r� Ferric chloride and ferrous chloride use, required to control hydrogen sulfide levels in our digester gas as required by AQMD Rule 431.1, will remain at approximately 1992-93 levels, well below the 1992-93 budget. During the course of this year, we will continue to experiment to optimize use of the various odor control chemicals and a possible replacement for chlorine, but expect our overall usage levels and budget requirements to remain high as we maintain compliance with increasingly stringent air quality regulations. However, as we gain more experience with new systems and covered facilities, we have been able to reduce the overall budget levels by decreasing our allowances for contingencies. (i) Chemical Coagulants - We expect that the increased cationic polymer usage levels in 1993-94 will result in a budget increase for the material. Polymer is added to the influent wastewater along with ferric chloride via the physical/chemical treatment systems at both plants to improve solids removal efficiencies in the primary clarifier basins. It is also added to digested sludge prior to dewatering to cause the sludge to coagulate to improve the sludge and water separation process. Ferric chloride is used as a backup chemical in the event the primary chemical distribution systems are out of service for repairs or maintenance, but primarily for enhanced primary physical/chemical clarifier performance. r Physical/chemical treatment systems were fully installed and operational at both plants this past year, and we expect to decrease our actual use of ferric chloride in these systems. A portion of ferric chloride costs are included in the odor control chemical category above to account for this additional benefit from its use. Anionic polymers are used in conjunction with the ferric chloride for advanced physical/chemical treatment. The budget amount for this chemical provides for an increase in cost from the historically low cost paid today while usage will remain consistent with the 1992-93 actual. (j) Other Operating Supplies - Miscellaneous items such as scrubber acids, activated carbon, solvents, cleaners, hardware, janitorial supplies, tools, laboratory supplies, etc., required to operate and maintain existing and expanding facilities. r r May 13, 1993 Schedule IV Page 4 (k) Contractual Services - The major component of this category is biosolids removal and disposal. Contracts have been executed with Pima Gro and Ag V Tech for agricultural reuse of residual solids. Since the closure of the Coyote Canyon Landfill, no replacement site for sludge disposal has yet been approved within the county. A total of $5.5 million has been budgeted for solids W removal and disposal. This category also includes appropriations for groundskeeping services, V janitorial services, toxics removal services, outside laboratory services, trash pickup, plant site sweeping, data processing system maintenance and support services, temporary help to level out periodic increases in staff workload and staffing levels, and a maintenance and operations contract for the Plant 2 oxygen generation plant. v (1) Professional Services - Includes General Counsel, special labor counsel, CPA audit and miscellaneous accounting, data processing, engineering and other technical consulting services. Some services classified as Engineering for the 1992-93 budget have been budgeted as Environmental Monitoring for 1993-94. (m) Printing and Publications - Budget allows for in-house and outside reproduction - costs and reflects expanded management information system and increasingly complex administrative requirements, as well as continuing demand by public and regulatory agencies for information on Districts' activities. The continuing efforts of our Public Information program to improve our public education program on Districts' activities is also reflected in the budget for this line item. This account also includes costs of advertisements and notices. 1 L (n) Rents and Leases - This account includes cost accounting system charges to the Joint Operating Fund for Districts-owned equipment, and outside L equipment rental for major equipment used for emergency repairs. The 1993-94 allocation is unchanged from 1992-93 (o) Repairs and Maintenance - This item, which is for parts and services for repair L of plant facilities, reflects an authorization to allow for routine equipment maintenance. Should this level of allocation prove to be insufficient in the ! event of major unexpected equipment failures and/or repairs, a transfer from V the unappropriated reserves of the individual Districts would be necessary to I meet the increased obligation. L (p) Research and Monitoring - $2 million in this account is for contract services to carry out the extensive ocean monitoring program required by EPA Region IX L under the provisions of the Districts' NPDES permit, which became effective April 1, 1985. The account also includes the Districts' contribution to the L u ., May 13, 1993 Schedule IV Page 5 Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCWRP) being conducted under a joint powers agreement with other Southern California municipal r dischargers, and also provides for some increased operational and ocean research and evaluation to develop optimum operating parameters in the treatment plants. r _ (q) Training. Meetings and Travel - Expanding activities of regulatory agencies have required increased Board member and staff travel in recent years. It is expected that considerable travel will continue to be required in connection _ with our continued efforts to obtain an extension of our NPDES permit conditions. Also includes ongoing technical training and materials for staff, expansion of our supervisory training program to help provide supervisors with the necessary training to more effectively manage their Divisional groups, and required training for new computerized control systems, Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS), Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) and other "high tech" equipment, processes and systems. (r) Uncollectible Accounts -For miscellaneous joint Districts' accounts that are determined by the General Counsel and Director of Finance to be uncollectible. .. (s) Utilities - The $1.1 million allocation for purchased power in this item reflects a decrease from 1992-93 budgeted levels due to operations of the new Central Power Generation Facilities. Increased natural gas purchases are also budgeted for a total of $1.9 million until digester gas compression facilities are complete. it) Other Operating Expenses - Expenses not chargeable elsewhere, such as freight and miscellaneous items, safety supplies and annual permit renewal fees and penalties assessed by the SCAQMD. (u) Expenses Applicable to Prior Years - Represents net adjustments to an operating or non-operating account balance from previous years. (v) Other Non-Operating Expenses - Miscellaneous items not chargeable elsewhere. �-' (w) Cost Allocation and Direct Chargebacks to CORF and Individual Districts - For _- materials, supplies and services cost allocation, and chargebacks for same purposes as described above under (b)• (x) Net JO Materials. Suoplies and Services - This line item represents the net materials, supplies and services chargeable to the Joint Operating Fund for administration and maintenance and operation of the Joint Works Facilities, - after chargebacks to other funds. I May 13, 1993 Schedule IV Page 6 (y) Net Revenues - Budget amount is for revenues from the wastehauler disposal facilities at Plant No. 1, sampling chargebacks to individual Districts, charges to other agencies and miscellaneous items. lr W Net JO Requirements - This line item represents the net Joint Operating Requirements after reduction of the Total Joint Operating Requirements by the 1w revenues generated from sale of by-products, charges to other agencies, and other miscellaneous operating revenues. I w 4d LI L W L L AEF.- Y OCSIW ATGVONOTES.SJ V l 64 L L JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET WORKERS' COMPENSATION SELF-INSURED FUND SCHEDULE V 1993-94 FISCAL YEAR 11-MeP93 1992-93 1993-94 1992.93 ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1.Salaries.Waves arxl Benefits 10,OD0 10,000 2.Benefits/Claims 1651000 150.000 165,000 3. Contractual Services 30.DDD 33,464 35.OD0 4.Legal Services 5,000 5,D00 5. Professional Services 35,000 30.125 35,D00 6.Supplies& Other 12,000 1.363 12,D00 7. Sato-Total 257,GDO 214,952 262,000 S.Excess Loss Policy 60,000 40,000 60,000 9. Total Expenditures 317,000 254.952 322,000 REVENUES&RESERVES 10. In,Ueu Premiums 225.000 225,000 225,000 11. Interest&Miacellsneous 77.000 58,052 80,000 12. Total Revenues 302.000 283,052 305.000 13.Excess Revenue (Expenditures) (15,000) 28.100 (17,000) 14.Ba9innin9 Reserves 606,000 633.092 661.000 15. Ending Reaervea 591,000 661,192 644,000 ISFI .XLWIWCBUD94.XLS-5/1 I A13-9:31 AM JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET _ SELF FUNDED HEALTH PLAN TRUST FUND SCHEDULE VI 1993-94 FISCAL YEAR 11-May-93 1992-93 1993-94 1992 93 ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1. Claims-Medical 1.300,000 2.501,255 2.989,000 2. Dental 277,000 368,200 400,000 3. Sub-Total 1,$77,000 2,869,455 3,389.000 4. Contractual Services 69.000 87.596 90,000 S. Stop Loss Insurance 101.000 100,850 115,000 6. Total Expenditures 1,747,000 3,057,901 3,594,000 REVENUES & RESERVES 7. In Lieu Premiums From-CSDOC 1,034,000 1.029,953 1,489,000 Employee 313,000 378,655 494.000 S. Interest& Miscellaneous 1,635 _ 9. Supplemental CSDOC Funding 400,000 1,700,000 1,611,000 10. Reimburse from Stop Lass Ins. 131,739 11. Total Revenue 1,747,000 3,241,982 3,594.000 12. Excess Revenue(Expenditures) (400,000) 184.081 13. Beginning Reserves 194,000 184,000 14. Ending Reserves 194,000 184,081 184.000 ISFI .XLWISFBUD94.XLS-5111/93.4:27 PM JOINT WORKS OPERATING BUDGET PUBLIC LIABILITY SELF-INSURED FUND SCHEDULE VII J 1993-94 FISCAL YEAR 11-May-93 1992-93 199394 1992-93 ESTIMATED RECOMMENDED EXPENDITURES BUDGET EXPENDITURES BUDGET 1.Salaries, Wages and Benefits 1,000 1.000 2. Benefits/Claims 500,000 500.000 120,000 3. Contractual Services 10.000 5,000 10,000 4. Legal Services 200,000 250,000 80.000 5.Professional Services 10.000 5,000 10,000 6.Supplies& Other 2.000 1.000 7. Sub-Total 723.000 760,000 222,000 S.Excess Lose Policy 265,000 9. Total Expenditures 988,000 760,000 222,000 REVENUES &RESERVES 10. In-Lou Premiums 350,000 350.000 _ 11. Interest&Miscellaneous 200,000 206,000 225,000 12.Allocation to Other Funds 1,000 1,000 13.Reimbursement from Insurances 1,230,000 14. Total Revenues 551,000 1,785,000 226,000 15. Excess Revenue IExpendituresl (437,000) 1,026,000 4.000 16. Rasarvas and Transfers 2,285,000 2.184.884 3,211,000 17. Ending Reserves 1,848,000 3,210,684 3.215.000 ISFI .XLWIPLBUD94.XLS-5/11/93-3:05 PM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JOINT WORKS CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND p15TP1GT3 OF OggNO�cO O O O D 0 O�� Off♦ O rHE ENVIR014 1993-1994 FISCAL YEAR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 IINTELUD.XLWICORF_93A.XLS c May-12-93 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE A SUMMARY OF DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS AND COMPARISON TO LAST YEAR 9 @ P E 6130193 1993-94 BUDGET 1992-93 PRELIMINARY BEGINNING COMPARABLE DISTRICT EQUITY BUDGET CAP FAC & COP FUND BUDGET PERCENT REQUIREMENTS RESERVES REQUIREMENTS 1 9.70% 6,793,000 15,481,000 8,007,000 2 29.06% 20,351,000 65,724,000 23,205,000 3 31.98% 22,396,000 54,870,000 25,592,000 5 3.91% 2,738,000 14,527,000 3,612,000 6 5.30% 3,712,000 4,014,000 4,410,000 7 7.12% 4,986,000 22,899,000 5,725,000 11 6.03% 4,223,000 9,012,000 4,838,000 13 0.80% 560,000 9,464,000 524,000 14 6.10% 4,272,000 (a) 51180,000 4,717,000 TOTAL 100.00% 70,032,000 201,171,000 80,630,000 (a) Funds will be provided by required deposits from IRWD CAPITAL OUTLAY'"01 FUND SCHEDULE 0 1 SUMMARY OF JDINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REOUWEMENTJ Ppe 1 .D IBB4 TO 2002-2003 A 8 L D E F 0 N J R L M6iR PLAN REVISED TOTAL ESTIMATED RfO1XRf0 ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED FIVE ESTIMATED TFN COST TO 0RB0.60 PROJECT EST CAP. BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET YEAR BUDGET YEAR COMPLETE ORIG EST IIIB/]0/0] III less 06 IB1616 100811 I007-98 TOTAL IBBLz00] TOTAL PROJECTS A Plnl I Am W IsPA e6 M•e P L Wnlebubl Dl•p 1 finale Sln Pl 37 11213 3 So 66.000 z00,000 BO.MO 260.000 Rb0.000 2.U orsse Time E•pirsen 108D MOD,PLEB 21.097.000 98,22E.0 J,R20.000 1fi0,000 6.M0.000 16.000.000 12.000.000 360,OW 39,OOg000 99.000.0Do ].Prlmny Trenmem 12 MOD E.P.—an.PL9] 32,600,000 31:436,000 126.000 600.000 6001000 12,0.... 12..0.,000 8AM,OW 31,'00.000 Jt,]W,000 4.SeevlY&LeMM.pIp,P13111 1,630,000 100.000 1,000.000 600,000 30.000 I,6J0.000 1.6]0.000 6.M1•c.Matle.PriorYV Flamenu Pl�]BS 6.370,000 600,OOo ].600.o00 2.280.000 2D.00D 6,))0,000 8J)0,000 B.MI¢.MaEiOCOIen PL]BA 3,000,000 4.100,000 800,000 2,000,OJO 1,000,000 60D.000 3,600,D00 ;IDI ).Flre Preleetion,Signals,W Water Diet,MN•,P1384 3.4T6,000 126.000 led ON 1.000.000 100.000 600.000 2.3... 2.3,01000 e.Ekc 1,Fec,MMe.11""IV Vprpe•1141 1 2,:02,600 2600 2. D 200,000 1.000.000 L000,000 500.000 $BW.000 2:.,Ooo B.FecZy Meta eM6tlay Uprtlee Pl AOQ 4,601,0D0 8,000 600.000 2.000,000 1,060.000 I,OOg000 4,600,000 4,b00,000 I O.Primay.11i1...1.P1 A 1 2,021,600 21.600 76,000 17 0.000 226,000 R,000,000 2: N: .0 1I MIet•IleML Improvements PL42,P1d6 2,201.10 65,000 40,0D0 1:000.No 1.000,000 2,140,CW 2.140,000 4.Sei•mlc Rebelil al Nansutsunel Systems P"3 4,2601000 260.000 1,600,000 1,000,C00 1.260,000 280.000 4.000.G00 4.W0.000 19,Senmic Rnrelll Suuewnl Pl A4 24,000.000 300,000 700.000 2,WQOOo 11,000,000 ).000.000 OOOI 23,100,000 2iJ00.000 14,ao MOO O.,V_/mt, SIWpe 6 DAIr 86AOJ.000 10:000,000 6.000.000 6:,WOoo 86,000,000 I6.Her.Pr•no l4 111 A.900,000 16,600,000 600,000 600,000 16,000,OM 18.6M,000 18.3elbe Starp•PBlvl 10.1 D.000 11.000.000 B,oD0.M0 8,000,000 6,000,000 n.Diwelae: 2®n0'Diemaa 0,100.o0D 6.too'NO 6.10D,oW 0,1oo,G0o to 12kr D.cnm.I Pawer 01cln6miun 2,4n.000 2,9o0,00 fio,o0p 1.000,Dao zso,0a0 1poo,000 L000.o00 230o,aoo I B.finerpeoa 3•wro•Bm..ayn.m l,ae2000 4.000,00o a,000.000 4.oD0,00o 20.Itt—it T-Mip Fen.16] 1,9o0.o0D 1,000,000 1.0oo,00D I,DDD,000 21,Central Air Cem mscr Seem 2.0,0D. 210,000 WIND 200,000 260,000 210.000 22,Mi.1.Pelecl, IO.WD.DDD 13,250.000 260.000 $.000.000 2.000 00.000 2.000.000 1.000.000 1,000DN 8,000,000 6,0 .000 IJ.000.000 2J.OIRn...let old,Frgene a 111- b N0. I Rebu INS 14,060,000 """.No 14,060,000 b.Nepwarke Ne.2l mpell•rryump Series.201a 2000.000 2.600.01 3.000,000 e,Remove Lmklin01i11en 2 6 4.2001 1.300,OD0 I,i00,000 1.300,000 6.40 Mod 01y9e1 A=fE SIWOe 60AF,2017 94,p00,OW 3410001000 J4,000,No e.11011010ealera.2003 B 301E 18.2CO.W0 10.300.000 18,200.000 1.4 Bait Peso.2004 10,920.No 10,920:000 10.ii 000 0.12 NV POwn Dnlribrderr.2001301E I'D.0,000 111001000 1,100.000 It.SMM6y Power Oe,unlian,2005 6 2015 4.11 5.000.000 6.DOD.000 1.13 Mptl Primary TraamIONl,E0 B RO@ 32,600,000 32,600 000 32.800 D00 SUBTOTAL -RECLAMATION PLANT I 292,730.000 369.382,000 6,123.000 19,216,00 20,200,000 46.276,000 36.800.000 11.540.004) 126,010.0001 46.100.001 1)],OBO,OW 100.870,000 CORF3A6d%L8 4/14/B3 4:46 PM CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND SCHEDULE BLI SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Pqa] 1013.1094 TO 2002-2003 A B C 0 F f 4 N I J K L MSTR PLAN REMSED TOTAL E6TIMATFO REpVIgFD E6TIMgTEO 69TIMATFO F6TIMgifD E6TIMgiEO RUE f9bMATEO TEN COST TO OR BBAO PROJECT EST C.LP, BUDGET BUGOFT BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET YEAR BUDGET YEAR COMPLETE ORIO EST 199394 B130123 190]A1 1994.66 1096.06 1998.97 1991.98 TOTAL 1999-]00] TOTAL PROJECTS B P em ]New w s IT BIG,,.MYor PreNeu: 1.6upwrr Feeililin✓M 9v ImRpremeMe a Owo0om BMIN,m.P333 6-0 ].1]6.000 3.610.000 1 0.000 1,600.000 t00,000 t0,00D 1.910.000 1.010.000 b.Wn htmms Buuebq,AT 35 2 4.864000 2. 1.000 06,000 1,400.000 1.000.000 60,000 ].RO,000 2: 60.00D [.MYmennw 13.1 ,P0d6-] 4,300.000 2,126:000 g6,000 I,BOODOO 100,000 WOOD ].fi6g000 2.660.000 II Menpemem O NPM.%F]BA 1.398.000 00.000 10,000 60.000 60.000 B0,D00 e.NPAM II Spe IS AP.11,Imp„P2,36.6 ]AOOp00 L100.000 100,000 860.000 1.180.000 3.000,000 2.000,000 3.Mnep Ogn[x 3.000.000 7,926,000 43fi,000 100.000 ],000.000 3.b00.000 3,M0,000 1.600,000 ).600,000 3.MIrtl O*." L,M,P3 3B3 S.M.. ].600.000 100.000 SO0.000 3.000.000 80O000 ],800,000 SENDING A,ReneB Dlpmlar N.O.P2-]9d 3=0.000 ADDING 100'. 1.300.000 2.0o.000 GOO.000 4,B00,000 I,BW,000 fi.P[im✓Y T aelmenl N MOD Fpxreim.PD41 14,]N NO 16.304.600 <6M 18.NN).000 I'.ID0.000 B.EM.N.R[erim P10.1t.P34S1 8.800.000 10.180,00D 10.000.000 I60,000 160.000 1fi0,000 ).8e[pMery Trnrmem FYpFmlm,p�422 I],400,000 If.100,000 P,000... 8.000.000 6,000.000 1'000.000 100,000 Ifi,100,000 IS,100,0' B.Prlprnv Misc.MaJ..P2-43-0 6.)fiO,000 1.100:011 3. 00 00 LEND. 360.00D 4.760.000 1.)60.000 9.MI¢.MpeifIcWM P343-3.P2.66 1.686.000 66.000 2.6pg000 2SGG 000 2.600.000 7.600.000 7.600,000 10 M'mrerXWPM9YMem.12A4(Sn J3Y11 6.3301000 1:221.1 2.111.01 ]1fi,000 3)6.000 WGOKN) 8)6.000 11.Fna PrplecPi Slpn 6 W.I. M ONI.Mpe.12JB ].e09.000 4JN.0]0 4.OD0 Ifi0,000 2. NO 1.60p.pO0 600.000 4.Bfi0,000 t.B60.000 12.ElecrL Fac.M.I.en19MMy Up&Ml P2AT1 ]A03,600 28C0 300,000 1.164000 T000,000 600.000 3A60.000 3.... 00 11.FeOl.ly 1,,,11SMMY Uprtlee P211,3 A.00S.000 6.OpO '00,000 1.160 NO 1.000.000 71Op00 4,000.000 4,000,NO l4.pr,mery C1.111-gelrA.P248 6,30,000 9),000 100.00. 4.060.';. )00.000 S.160.000 ..160,000 16.MvicelMmplx Improve-Int.PF�49 ]0],000 10],000 300.000 ]OOp00 000 rR.Senmm R.PPIANNMrv9uuelvY SYMMm P2-w 1100.... oLpa 5lerpe: 19000 760.. 360p0 3.000.000 1:11000 1:21.11 211,000 ) Scnmrc AM9rfl Slmcvel P]-6].P2431.2 4,306.000 ]4,000.000 1.]0000 ..00 .0 6Mp.O. B000.000 ]1],6000..ON 4 ]3L.fi7W00.00 )Bim 6.300.000 6.]00.00 ].t00.000 3C .00 4.ON000 000:. 600000 )OM P.M 06PoxO9eex ] .0000 2.00.0 00I PIP,,W.Ie1 Pmp S1e0w .B1fi.0000 4=..;0pO 11200,000 112OD,000 11..1- Prelecv 10,000,000 13.180.000 180.000 2,000.000 2,000,000 3,000,000 1.000.000 "MIN0 810001000 6,000.000 1SGOCW0 2Y OlbrMolar Plen PrepcM e.Replete P11m✓Y Bnin A.B.C.2000 1,.1DOW 11.100.000 lIJM.000 p.StwNBY Ppwar Oannliom 20066]016 OD IB.1]O,O IO.000.000 10.000.000 c.MCMlMip erM CoPtlM SYermn.3006 6]000D 630000 820 M0 SUBTOTAL -TREATMENT PLANT 2 121112W 1.0142000 I8837000 30316000 11400000 24110000 19200000 11100000 121296000 24400000 146088000 212M.OW C.Olbile Weler Mtlem an%n 1.911a MCWMlien 18.00D,ODD 6,100.000 100.000 6.000.000 8,000.000 6p00,OM 2.Re[Iemmlan PMnl] 62.000.000 10.000.000 450.000 60.000 fi0,000 fiO,OW 16.000,000 Sb,000,000 40,1:0..0 40,100.00D SUBTOTAL- RECLAMATION PLANTS ))000000 t6)00000 660000 60SOW0 60000 60000 16000000 38000000 48/60000 46160000 C`RF( eL 1 1 1 1 1 1 m3 1 1 1 1 1 1 t A,:.9 PM 1 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVBWNG FUND SCNEOULF B 1 SUMMARY OF JOINT WORKS CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Ppe] I003.10 W TO 20112�20N A 0 C D f F 0 N J R L M]TR PLAN RFVIS FD TOTAL ESTIMATED REOUIREO ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED FIVE ESTIMATED TEN COST TO on BB OG PROJECT EST CJ.P. BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET YEAR BUDGET YEAR CDMPLFTF .IN EST 108309 Bl]OA] IB010C 100Y06 I00.AT IBBp�0] 1997 9B TOTAL IB88300T TOTAL PROJECTS D.In mt W Jwm FacTm nlerawrl 111 PB 30,320A00 24,000,000 23,600,000 600000 G00.OW .00,M0 3.S.I l_Amn"'Sie Im%ewmema e.burin.Ames 0 ON L4 S1a JJ116 J-11-1 000,000 .,I60,000 "0.GG0 1.1 1.1. 00 2,11.01 J0O000 ..000,OM <,000.NG II -i—M 1.C.p..121.1 ...'COOK) 6p00,000 ..000,000 100,000 100,000 100,OGG e,C—AXn EO AYAG.J 23 211 PSSaa1 6,0]OA00 2..... $.60O0p0 26,000 26.000 26.M0 G.Pneemx OUlpirp n%I 1.J.}p 0 GIA00 2.060,000 100,000 1,400.000 1!00.000 60.000 3.060.0. 2.1 60W0 a.OemaNipn cl Ok Cenvd Cenly Ofi0.000 260,000 IOO.000 Y60.000 Y60.000 L Oemd,lipn cl Swpwl BNp,®P},Y3) 1,]W,000 100.000 600.000 60G.00D 300.000 1R00.000 1,200,000 B.C.Ml.Leb I.M.-M..&IM0...11h1A,3 )<2,. 0 )<2,000 742,000 112,000 1.Cem YOXre nRc a ECII-PPF—.J-I9B BA 22.000,000 23,)}0.000 21,260000 380.000 310.W0 ])O.ON ]OO.OM 1,<00.000 I,p80.000 b.PU Me nPweM1I ISI ;060.000 ],IOQ000 ].W.ON [.Rent l FXi01Y,J 10.1 16,800,000 20.060.000 $0,600,000 200,000 ]00.o. 200,000 A.%enl3!.c&M_— 36]00.000 2BA60A00 2B.}60.000 0GO,000 000000 BOO,MO e, 1.11.FIAMen.M,1 D IA n ],6"ADS 1,600,00G 3.000.000 3,000.000 2o00,ON ..Wnu G n Flwx,Y31,J31A 182.000 b,000 26,000 fi.000 6.000 fi,000 6.OrnI. 6 Boceur Punp SXiprN a EYAAM. YINa1LM 5etuen l2}.2 2,.<B4Op0 1,8"NG 1,BGO000 '0000 .0.000 <0000 b.FpuOmam PraW[Ivw J 16A A,600,000 <JI00,000 ]00.000 ]M.000 ]00.000 E.Tamp Cl2 Sleuen IM ONIYI Np. 1 2.800.0CD 2 46M 000 2.600.000 A.SI DN.M. e Neuter OOBS'C' ].880,000 4,E36,000 26,000 41000 LBOO,000 3AOO,000 4.111.000 A00.000 9,c21.000 e.Rageta]B' w/1$0'Om1 YI la Owp Wnn 66.6BB.000 fiIR60.0V0 60.000 1W,000 IA0O000 IOOA00 LOW O00 2, wINS0 39.000,000 cl.$60.000 To ON.000 B.CpmpmervaA FX,IpY RecwM VX Owp.5Ye1em J3b1 3,B10.000 BO,OW 1,OW,000 1.6W.GW 1000A00 GG.000 ],66Q000 ].660,WO I.EIec1I.Ae Syneme RXrep,SIWm J Qfi Q ].000,000 BENI Xp,WO ]W.000 ]W,OW AN 000 B.TAAMMwReNMAtY M=Mo E.P_J lB 6]OpW 130.000 YW.OW OW,WO EOO,WO 9.Gt.M Pew.ReYe6MY MW.1.33 19,036,000 I6.CA0.000 1,000.000 TEND I1 A6cae.....PHcuaa1cwnM w 4 iry5 / . LOO6O.OW BWO,O 0 6.OW.OW 16,00000 IO Otten OVUM RNYNMY UNIMMI J'3< 1,]OO.WO 1ORI 2, 0.000 6O0W 8.00000 1WW 1:000,000 I,BwbrAlmerpl—lf Repepmenl 36A$O. W ] I,W000 6.0A00 8,0W.W0 26000,W0 ]I0000 2 $WBOwp%geEle el OW0 B ON 06.300.000 SON 9.000,000 tpuu oo.o0 1 % I } O0bLmpA 00 BO0OG , . .00,000 1,060,000 LOOO.O 60,000, 0W0 1 GO 18,000000.00000LPMUIG DI Plwe l 2p , . W 3.0GO ,000 0 A Cwpw 50,0W,0W 60.]6O.OW 5,000.000 000..0 46,360WO 13.ORt"'M Owmne MangemAM Nw a MYM 60ryr Mpmm C-FAMIf SYelem B . 8 , 0 $60,0 }600W } 0O }LW Mwmam Mgenl 5nlem .0, } W W,. }60.0 AccwnryFnziY lMmXmSyeem 0 LAW. W I Fv.M'MASn.m ...000 300,W0 ]BO.. IW, 0 830W 0 CORF3A94,XLS 4/I4/9] p:AB PM CAPITAL OUTLAY AEVOLNNG FUND SCHEDULE SA SUMMARY OF JOINT WOMB CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS pate I 10931 OOe TO 2002-2003 A 8 C D F F G H 1 J R L MSTR AN" REVISED TOTAL ESTIMATED REQUIRED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED FIVF ESTIMATED TfN COST TO OR BB BO PROJECT EST [I P. 6UDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET BUDGET YEM BUDGET YEAR COMPLETE OPDX 1BBYN OIB3 IBBYeo 4B8 1B.G 00 IBBBBJ 100708 TOTAL IBBBO003 TOTAL PROJECTS I..ImpmveG IIPlml S-11oKI Fecilliee. 116.000 BI]I6.000 IDO. 100.000 ISO 000 I E ROAK Sampler SYeleme J 321.2 326000 BOOM IB6.000 b0.000 60.000 296.000 206.000 I B.OIMr Maul Plen Prgecle e.Elrperq OOBS'C IO NmT"10 D.126.000 27.1261M0 2).126AM b.51W9e Diep.LancHIS POP,II 2011 15.600.000 16.op0.M0 16.0M.0M e.51Wa.Omp.EWP Pnw 161I 2001 11.660.000 11.6MO00 11.600.000 17.WING,E;"iry Duecien,"MOOKA SIWY MARD 1SE.000 1MAM S... 2..w 20.030 IB.Mie[Prge[O 6.000.0M 11.)10.000 210000 1.600000 1.600.000 1.800,M0 1.M0.M0 1.0M 0M 6.6M,000 S.0M.M0 I1.6M.M0 SUBTOTAL ,I NT fRPLANTB JOINT 3B032B0M <2B26BM0 11]IBB]M 16,092000 21.7600M 2]220M M M 0 131300 )OD0000 BO9B20 0840000 169392000 14678600o E.5 - P Sutllee Rau o.It 6 Gerel oomem 1.Acllm Pen: e. HRD ES Permit l ApplcNionl 63.00 376.M0 326.000 60.0M 60.000 M.MO B. NMES Permit I.-Iorlrp ChAKNJ IM.000 60.00D 60.M0 b0.M0 W. 2.30I M Trnmenl,D'npmtl eM Wue IMOOD 1 SOA00 26Q0M I60.M0 I..000 7M.000 9MAO0 ].Air OuollY COFON Plop's e.Ab Toviq lmeM91V lAB2H.wl PEEPI IM,000 1.648.000 1.2BB.000 300.000 300,0M ]00.000 b.LmIM ertl ROG Conlml:Bleliller R60 2M.0M 380.M0 M,000 330,000 330.M0 ]30.000 [.Air ErTow-So-C-1. 60.000 W.. 60.000 GRAM J.SLAOMOflW tl1.l:Shcu Conlrq 2M,M0 2M.M0 200,000 2M.M0 e.5CA0MD NW 1179:000,C[MrW 8)0.000 2M.0M B20,M0 020.000 020,M0 1.$CAGMD M VMMe04 permiu PrOO- 60000 60.000 60.000 M.MO B.To..M Rlh...,I.0n AoR- 26O.M0 260.000 260000 260.000 R AA.DIANN.0erel00M." 16A00 25.000 W.000 60000 60.M0 <.W.Ier C0r0ery 6"'U'" mn R60 Prgecn 850.000 1MO00 "0.000 100.0M 1M.M0 100A00 WOOD 360.0M 8fi0.M0 6.EwirO-IN Rmu[M1 G Development 2jB6.000 286.000 600.000 b00.000 600AM 600.000 600.0M 2.6W.000 2.604M0 B.Msar Pbn VpEau 3.000 M0 100.000 1,600,M0 fiM.MO Boo" 0 3.BM.000 3.800.M0 SUBTOTAL-SPECIAL PROJECTS 699000 12.08].MO 2.OB30M 2.500,000 1.600,000 MOBBED 1100 M0 I100000 B.bM.OM 11M 0M 0.800M0 F fouOmenUume ]3660.0M aBA80.0M ]JI<.000 3.0M.000 2.600.000 2.M0.Mo 16M.Mp I.M0000 To.000A00 )600.000 17.600.000 27.226.000 TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL REG B20.S2B0M 108].830,000 100.aB6.3M 70.032.OM 82.M0.000 92.866.M0 86.730.000 66.)M.OM 302.012.0M IB)6M.DD0 6M.B1).000 3BB.BM.OM C�RF.jB L5� � , • ' � , / 03 , , , ' � , � � yB:ae PM e sn2�.1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY SCHED C CORF EQUIPMENT BUDGET 5/12193 1993.94 8:17 AM TRUCKS & OTHER MACHINE COMMUN INSTRITEST SAFETY& OFFICE COMPUTER 199394 DIV VEHICLES MOBILE EO. ED&TOOLS EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT TRAFFIC ED FIX&ED EQUIPMENT TOTAL NO. DEPARTMENT SSS61 R SSS62 R SSS63-R 55564-R 55566 R 55567-R 55568-R $5569 A BUDGET 2150 Management Office 7,500 7.500 2160 Board Secretary 25,000 5.000 30.000 2170 Management Support 7,500 7,500 2180 Personnel 65,000 10.000 75.000 2210 Direeto,of Finance 5.000 10.000 15.000 2220 Accounting 9.000 15.000 24,0G0 2230 Purchasing/Warehousing 5.925 41,400 47.325 2240 Information Systems 5,000 6,000 34.100 17,200 306.346 368,646 3310 Dir.of Oper.& Mica. 3,600 15.100 15,000 8,100 10,000 51,800 3330 Plant Maintenance 3340 Collection Facilities 100,000 6,500 24,000 19,800 10.200 16015W 3350 Mechanical Maintenance 69,000 186,450 18,475 Boo 3,000 16,200 8,300 302,225 3360 Electrical Maintenance 35,000 17,100 5,100 5.600 1.800 64,600 3370 Instrument. Maintenance 30,400 6,000 26.300 16,150 78,850 3380 Treatment Plant Oper. 16,000 9.750 2,700 16,100 8.900 5.000 13,195 6.000 77,645 3510 Dir. of Technical Sow. 1,000 1,000 3520 Compliance 65.000 5.800 70,800 3530 Consv., Recl.&Reuse 3540 Air Quality am 32,500 91500 2,000 44.800 3580 Laboratory 49,500 969,809 148,4G0 1,167,709 3590 Source Control 5,050 63,700 20,SG0 13,175 7,950 110,375 3710 Director of Engineering 2,500 2.500 3720 Planning arM Design 12,500 1,000 1,000 20.075 169,700 204,275 3790 Construction Management 48,000 9,100 600 8,400 5,850 18,000 87,950 TOTAL 9394 REQUESTS 398.000 233,100 62.275 52,550 1,245,409 76,300 150,9]0 ]81,398 3,000,000 CORF93C.XLS 1 l I 1 1 1 1 1 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES FISCAL YEAR 1993 94 PERCENTAGE ALLOCATION 199394 BUDGET YEAR THROUGH HIM Replacemnt Improved Additjensl ReRWrod Replacamnt Improwd Additional Cost To Rap1minamt Improwd Addhlonal L Treatment CapacIt, COAF L Troalm.nt Capacity Complete 6 Treatment Capacity 9...nnr Budget Reoan.8 Maate Ian Recomtr A. Near l New and Rebudoetad M-Proect.' I, Weat.houl.r Di.p L Semple St.PI.29-1/2/3 50.00% 50.00% 200.00D 1001000 0 100,000 305.000 152.50e 0 152.500 2. Secondary Trod E.penajen t.80 MGD. P1.36 40.00% 60.00% 760,00e 0 300,000 450.000 38.222,000 0 14.488,800 21.733,200 3. Rimery Treatment 72 MGD Ern;...We.P1.37 100.00% 500.000 0 0 600.000 31,425,00e O 0 31.426.000 4. Security 6 Leruliam irrg, P1-38-1 100.00% 1.00OODO 1.000.000 0 0 1.630.0(0 1.830.000 0 0 5, Mile. Mods. priority Elements P1 38 2 75.00% 25.00% 3.500.000 2.625.000 826.000 0 6,370,000 4,777,500 1,692.500 0 B. Misc. Modifications P1 38.4 25.00% 75.00% 2.000.000 60%OX 1,6001000 0 4,100.000 1.025.000 3.025,000 0 T. Fire protection.Slgnege,and Water Oil . Mode.P1 30 5 60.00% 50.00% 150,000 95.000 75.000 0 2,436.000 1,232.500 1.232,500 0 8. Electl.Fit. Made.and Solely Upgrade.P1.4B1 76.00% 25.00% 200,1)00 1WOOD WOOD 0 2,902.50e 2,176.676 726,625 0 9. Facility Mode. and Safety Upgrades P1 40-2 75.00% 25.00% 600,000 375.000 126,000 0 4.608.000 3.379.500 1.128,500 0 10. Primary Gadiier Rehab. P1 41 90.00% 1a m% T6.000 69,600 7.500 0 2,021,600 1,819,350 202,150 0 11. Mi...lien....Impr.vintnt,PI.42.PI-46 50.00% 50.00% 140,000 70,000 70,000 0 2,205.000 1,102,500 1.102,500 0 12.Seismic Retrofit of NonSI-tur.l System.PI 43 50.00% 50.00% 1.600,000 750.000 T50,Oo0 0 4,260,ODe 2.125.000 2.126,000 0 13,Sebmk Retrofit Structural PI.44 50.00% 60.00% 200.000 350000 350.000 0 24.000.000 12.000.000 12.000,000 0 14.40 MOD Oxygen Activated Sludge 6 OAF'. 100.00% 0 0 0 0 70.000.000 0 0 90.000.000 15.Bell Pre....14 Un11a1 100.00% 0 0 0 0 15.5001000 0 0 I61505.000 16. Salta.Storage 14 Mail I00.00% 0 0 0 0 MOOG.000 0 0 11.000.000 17. Digital...: 2 @ 11 o'Diameter 100.00% 0 0 0 0 9,100000 0 0 91100,0e0 18. 12ky Electrical Fewer DlRobutlon 10000% 0 0 0 0 2,300,000 0 0 2,300.000 19.Emergency Sewage Bypass System 100.00% 0 0 0 0 4.000.000 0 0 4.000.000 20.Remew Tackling Fill..1 L 3 100.0e% 0 0 0 0 1.0t10,000 1.000.000 0 0 21.Central Air Compares-Station 60.00% 50.00% 0 0 0 0 250,000 125,000 0 125.000 22. Mi., projects 60.00% 20.00% 20.00% 2,000.000 1.200.OU0 400.W 40e,000 13.250,000 7,950.000 2.650,000 2.650.000 23. Other Matter Ran projects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a.Headworks No. 1 Rebuild, 2003 50.00% 50.00% 0 0 0 0 14,950.000 2A76.000 0 2,476,000 b.H.edwodrs No.2 leap tin/Pump Speed. 2016 60.00% 60.00% 0 0 0 O 2.600,000 1,300,000 0 1,300,000 c.R.mew Trickling Fihen 2 L 4. 2002 50.00% 50.00% 0 0 0 0 1.300,000 6501000 660,000 0 it.40 Mod Oxygen Act'd Sludge LOAF. MiT 100.00% 0 0 0 0 34.000,000 0 34,000,000 0 a. I10 It Milliliters, 200362012 100.00% 0 0 0 0 18,2001OD0 0 0 IB,200,OOo 1.4 Sell Pre..... 2004 60.00% 60.00% 0 0 0 0 10,920.000 0 5.460.000 5A60.000 g. 12 NV Power Distribution. 2MI-2012 1DOA0% 0 0 0 0 1.100.000 0 0 I.I00.00o h.Standby Paws.Edmondson. WINS L MIS 100.00% 0 0 0 0 6,000,000 0 0 5,000,000 1.72 Mid Rimery Treatment. 2004 6 MI 100.00% 0 0 0 0 32.600,000 0 0 32.500.000 SUBTOTAL -RECLAMATION RANT 1 113.216.0DO 2.263.500 4.502.600 1.450,000 369,282,000 49.926,725 80.435,596 239,020,700 CORF44pa AL5 509 PM n Vp Py. 2 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES FISCAL YEAR 1993.94 PERCENTAGE ALLOCATION 1993 94 BUDGET YEAR THROUGH 2O20 Wplecemm Improved Additional Required Raplacemnt Improwd Additional Coat To Replacemnt Improwd Additional A Treatment Capacity CORF 0 Treatment Capacity Compiled 8 Treatment Capacity Amemor Budget RecomO MMLe len Reconstr 0 B Pant 2 New and Rebudoeted Meter Pudlct.: 0 1. Support Facilltie.add Site Immpwmeme 0 a.Operations Building. P2 23'5-1 100.00% 1,600,000 0 0 1.500.000 2.6101000 0 0 2.510.000 b. W...no...Building. P2.35.2 lo000% 1.400.000 1.400.000 0 0 2,825,000 2,025,000 0 0 c. Maintenance Building. P2 35 3 100.00% I,B00,000 1.800.000 0 0 2.7n,000 2.725.000 0 0 d.Construction Management Office.P2.35.4 100.00% 50.000 WOOD 0 0 60,000 60,000 0 0 e.Phe..II Site 9 Security Imp.,P2 35 5 100.00% a60,000 850,000 0 0 2.100.000 2.100.000 0 0 2. Rehab Digester 1,J.K.P2 39-1 100.00% 100.000 M.000 0 0 7,925,000 7,925,000 0 0 3. Rehab Digester L.M. P2-39-2 100.00% 100,000 100,000 0 0 3,800.000 3.000.000 0 0 4, Rehab Digester N,O.P2 39 3 100.00% 100.000 100,000 0 a 4.80 .000 4,000,000 0 0 S. Primary Treatment 24 MOD E.panelon, P2 41 100.00% 0 0 0 0 15.204,500 0 0 15,204.500 S.Electrification Project,P242-1 100.00% I50,000 0 0 1WOOD 10.150,000 0 0 101160.000 T.Secondary Treatment Expansion.P2 42-2 25.00% 25.00% 8.000,000 0 8.000.000 2.000.ODO 17.100.000 0 12.825.000 4.275.000 B. Priority Misc. Mad., P2-43-1 50.00% 50.00% 3.000.000 1,500.000 1.500,000 0 5,750,000 2.B>6.000 2.875.000 0 9. Misc. Modiloidium; P2.43.3.P2 56 50.00% 50.00% 2.500,000 1,250.000 1.250.000 0 7.555.000 3.777.500 3,722,500 0 10, MonitarlColBrel System, P2 441hus J-2b11 50.00% 60.00% 225.000 I37,500 0 137.500 3,225,000 1,812.500 0 1.612.600 11. Fin Prediction.Sign.A Ware,Glen. bade. P2-48 25.00% 25.00% I60.000 112.500 37,500 0 4,654,000 3.490,500 1,163,500 0 12.Elmdl.Fee. Mode. and Safety Upgrad..P2.47.1 26.00% 25.00% 200.000 150.000 W." 0 3.452,500 2,589,376 863.125 0 13.FacIIAy,Mod.. and Safety Upgrades P2-42 2 25.00% 25.00% 500.000 325.000 125.000 0 4.006.000 3.004.500 1,001.500 0 14. Primary Clarifier Rehab.P2-48 76.00% 26.00% 400,000 300.000 100,000 0 6,247.000 3,935,260 1.311.750 0 15. MI...lien....Imp-suremu P2.49 75.00% 25.00% 200.000 160,000 50.000 0 303.000 227,250 75,750 0 16. Seismic Retrofit of Non Structural Systems P2-50 50.00% 50.00% 2,000,000 1.000.000 1.000,000 0 4.250,000 2,375,000 2.375.000 0 12. Seismic Relmlit Structural P2-53, P2 43-1,2 50.00% 50.0056 5,000,000 2,50 ,000 2.500.000 0 35.000.000 17.500.000 17.600.000 0 18. Subtly Storage: 2 Blue 100.0096 0 0 0 D 5,200000 0 5.200.ODO 0 19. Additional IDS Foot Digester 100.00% 0 0 0 0 4.000,000 0 0 4,000,000 20, Pant Water Pump Student 100.00% 0 0 0 0 1,200000 0 I'M." 0 21. Mar., Pthi.te 60.00% 20.00% 20.00% 2.000." 1,200,000 400,000 400,000 13.180.000 7.900.000 2.636.000 2,838,030 22.Other Meet.,Pan Project. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e.Replace Primary Basin.A,B.C.200E 25.00% 25.00% 0 0 0 0 11.7000OD 8,776.000 2.925.000 0 b.Standby Power Generation, 200E 8 2015 100.00% 0 0 0 0 10.000.000 0 0 t0.OD0.000 .. Manitodlq and Control System. 200E 50.00% 50.00% 0 0 0 0 520.000 200.000 M." 0 SUB-TOTAL TREATMENT PLANT 2 30,226,000 13,075,000 13.012,600 4.107.500 188.242.000 82,364.825 55.989.126 50.388,000 C.011.11.Water Reclamation Pent. 1. Sire Accruement 60.00% 50.00% 5,000,000 0 2.500.000 2.600.00(1 5.100.000 0 2.660.000 2.550.00D 2.Reclamation Pent 3 50.00% 50.00% 50.000 0 25,000 26,000 40,000,000 0 20.".000 201300.000 SUB-TOTAL RECLAMATION PLANTS 5.050.00o 0 2.626.000 2.626.000 46.T00.000 0 22,8anM "'its.000 ,Fy b 9, ,P i :, , , S I , I I 1 G- . is t V11N5 1 PVe 3 CAPRAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED MOJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 PERCENTAGE ALLOCATION 199194 BUDGET YEAR THROUGH 2O20 Replxemnt Imp--d Additional Required Replacemnt Impmwd Additional Coat To Replxemnt Improved Additional 6 Treatment Capacity CORF 5 Tmatmium Capacity Complete 6 Trestment Cali Rec ruler Budget Rec nstr Minuar,hurn Rec mlr O. Intemlent and Joint Facilities 1.Interplant Facilities, 1.9 15.00% 85.00% 500,000 75.000 O 425.000 24J000.000 3.60D,000 O 20.400.000 2. Su,MM Fecilitiaa and Site Improvements 0 O O 0 O 0 0 s, Admin. Annex at OM Lab Site J30 At J 1 t-1 50.00% 50,00% 200.000 100.000 O 100.000 4,150,000 2.075,000 O 2.075,000 It.Operations/Control Center,J-234 50.00% 50.00% 100.000 50.000 0 50,000 5.000.000 2.500.000 0 2.500ODO C. Computer Equipment.J 232(See P2-44) 100.00% 25,000 0 25.000 0 2,525,000 0 2,525,000 0 d, Personnel Building a1 %t 1.J 26 IOODO% 1 OOO,OCO O IA00.000 O 2.950.000 O 3.950.000 0 e,DemoFtwn al Old Control Center 100.00% 350,000 350.000 0 O 450,000 450,000 0 0 I. Demolition of Support 81d,@P2.J-27 100.00% SCQ000 500.000 O O 1.300.000 1,300.000 O 0 g.Carom Lab Improvemenu/Upgrades J 17 1 2,3 111000% 742,000 0 742.000 0 742.000 0 742.000 0 3. Central Generation Facilties 0 O O O O O 0 a, Equipment Prepurchase.J 19A 50.00% 50.00% 360.000 1SO.000 O 180J100 22J30.000 11.365.000 0 11.365.000 b.Emission Purchase,J 19B 50.00% 50.00% 0 0 0 O 3.100.000 1,550.000 O 1.550.000 C, Rent 1 Facility.J-19-1 50.Oo% 50.00% 300000 150,000 0 150.000 20.800.000 10,400000 0 10.400,000 d. MOM 2 Facility,J 19 2 50,00% 50.00% 800,000 400,000 0 400000 29,G50,000 14,525,000 O 14,525,000 e. Engine Eveluetiwn end Re noralion 100.00% 2,000,000 21000,000 O O 3,500000 3.500.000 O O 4.Waste Gas Flsms,J 21,J 21A 100,00% 5,000 0 5,000 0 30.000 0 30.000 0 5.Duties 5 Booster Pump Stations 0 0 O 0 O O O a, Reps. Outfall No. 1 Lend Section.J 22 2 100.00% 40.000 0 40,000 0 1,640.000 0 1,640.00(1 0 b, Equipment Pregumhese J 15-A 100A0% 300L000 0 0 300.000 4.500.000 O O 4.500.000 c,Temp C12 Station for OutfAl No, 1 1U0,00% 0 0 0 0 2.60(1 0 0 2.600." d. Second Michaels,Header GOES'C' 7000% 30.00% 25.000 17.50) 0 7,500 4,425,000 3.097.500 0 1,327,500 e. Replace 78' w1120'Omfall t0 Deep Water 100,00% 50.000 0 O 50,000 51250.000 O 0 51,250.0DO 6.Campulerixad Facility RecoNv end Dwg-Sysem J-25A IOO'w% 1.000000 1,ODO.00J O O 3,610,000 3,610,000 O 0 Z Elec1L Power Systems Rehah, Studies J 25 2 T5,00% 25.00% 3 0.000 225.000 75.000 O 50OJ00 375.000 125.000 0 8.Teleph unba.amatry Monitoring Exp.T28 50.00% 50.0016 400.000 200.000 200.000 0 530.000 265.000 265,000 0 9.Standby Power Reliability Mods.J33 50.00% 50.00% 100D000 500.000 500,000 0 15.000,000 7.500.000 )50D000 0 10, Ocean Outfsll Reliability Upgrades J34 50.00% 50.00% 2.000.000 0 1,OOD000 1,000,000 14.000,OCO O 7.000,O0O 7,000,030 11.BusheN Interplant Trunk Replacement 8000% 20.00% O O O O 31,00D,ODO 24,800,000 0 6200,000 12.Sludge Disposal Projects 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 e.Commit Demonstration Rent 50.00% 50.00% 0 0 0 O 9.000.000 0 L!iO0.000 4,500J100 b. Land Acquisition 50.00% 5000% 100,000 50,000 O 50.000 21.950.1%q 10.975.000 0 10.9T5,000 a Landfip Development Phase I 50.00% 50,00% 0 O 0 0 28.600.000 14200.000 0 14,3C0,000 d. Compost Facilty 50.00% 50.00% O 0 0 O SG':6 000 O 25.1 SD.000 25.180,000 13,District Information Management Network 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 e. Maint 8 Our Mgmnt Computer System IOOAO% 25g000 0 250.. O 900,AGO O 900,000 O It. Lab Information Man,.-.System Upgrades 10000% 250.000 0 250.000 O 250,000 0 250,000 O c. Ppmhasbq/Accounting/Finenciel Information System 50.00% 25.00% 25.00% T50.000 3T51" 18],500 18).SOO 1.501.000 750.500 375,250 3➢&250 d.Netwmk System Integration 50J%I% SO.00% MOODD 170.000 1)O.ODD 0 820,000 410.000 410.000 0 CORF4A94.XL5 5UB R11 1114N3 Pairs 4 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND CLASSIFICATION OF BUDGETED PROJECTS BY REVENUE PROGRAM CATEGORIES FISCAL YEAR 1993.94 PERCENTAGE ALLOCATION 1993-94 BUDGET YEAR THROUGH 2O20 Replacement Improved AddMonal Required Replacemnt Improved Additional Cost To Replacemnt Improved Additional & Treatment Capacity CORF & Treatment Capacity Complst. & Treatment Capacity R...mtr Bud et Racoon, Mesta Ian R...net, 0 14.Impmwd In Floor Sampling Facilities. 50.00% 50.00% 100.000 50.000 60.000 0 115.000 57.500 671500 0 15.Ellluenl Sampler Systems J 321.2 60.00% 60.00% 166.001) 92,600 92.SM 0 325,000 182,500 IB2.600 0 16.Other Master flan Project* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. Evpand DOSS'C'to North 2019 50.00% 50.M% 0 0 0 0 27.125,000 13,682.600 0 13,502,6M b. Sludge GNP. Landfill Ph...II 2011 50.M% 50.001% 0 0 0 0 15,00(3.000 7,800.000 0 7.800,000 e.Sludge Ol., Equip Phne I& II 2M1 50.00% 50.00% 0 0 0 0 11.500,001) 5,760.000 0 5,750,000 17.Water Duality DIwsk n and Treatment Study ISARR 100.00% 20.000 0 201000 0 1"1" 0 120.000 0 1B. Mi..Prolact. 60.00% 20.0016 20.00% 1.500.000 9O%OM 300.000 3001000 11.910.000 7.026.000 2.342.000 2,342,000 SUBTOTAL -INTERPLANT&JOINT 15.892.000 7.385.000 5.307,000 3,200.00t1 420.268.01 151,708,500 57.074.250 220.433,260 E. Special Pnolocts.Studies Research&Development 0 1. Action Ran: a. NIMES Permit I Appllcetl0nl 100.0016 60.000 0 60.000 0 375,000 0 376,000 0 It. NPDES Permit IMonitodng Chan issl 100.00% 50.000 0 60.000 0 1001000 0 IN." 0 2.Solids Troermenl,Disposal and Reuse 100.00% 160.000 0 150.000 0 I,1M.OM 0 1.160.000 0 3.Air Duality Control Program 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a. Air Teel..Invenlpry IAB2588.1 KEPI 100.0014 300.000 0 300.000 0 1,540.000 0 1.648,000 0 b.Tesic.and ROO Control:Biellltar R&D 100.00% 330,OM 0 330.000 0 3501000 0 380.000 0 c. Air Emissions Source Oontml 100.00% 50.000 0 50,0M 0 M,OM 0 60.0M 0 d. SCAGMD Rule 431.1:Sullur Central 100.00% 20OND 0 200.000 0 200000 0 200.000 0 a.SCAOMD Rule 11 79:Oalm Control 101 420.000 0 420,000 0 670.000 0 670.000 0 f. SCAOMD Marketable Permit.Program 100.00% SO." 0 50.000 0 501000 0 50.000 0 g.Teal..Risk Reduction Program 100.00% 250.000 0 250,000 0 250,000 0 260,000 0 b.A.O.Death...Development 100.00% 501000 0 60,000 0 25.000 0 76,000 0 4.Water Consery&Reclamation R&D Pmlects 100.00% 1001000 0 100.000 0 8501000 0 850,000 0 S.Envinsup. tat%.much&D,v I.pmant 100.00% 500.000 0 500,000 0 2.785,000 0 2.786.000 0 6. Meeter Plan Under. 60.00% SD00% 100.000 0 BOND BOND 3.600.OM 0 1,800,000 1.BM,OM SUB-TOTAL-SPECIAL PROJECTS 2.6000OO 0 2.6Sg000 50,000 12.063,000 0 10,283,000 1.800.000 F. Eaulomenl Item. 20.00% so.M% 30.00% 3,000.000 800.:0) 1.5M,000 BM,000 48,469,000 9,693.8M 24,234,600 14,540.2M TOTAL JOINT WORKS CAPITAL RED )0,032.OM 28.322.6GO 29.39T,0M 12,312.500 1,093,634,040 203,690.900 250,866,450 549,076,650 Paroanlro Total Requlromanb 100.00% 40.44% 41.98% I7.50% 100.00% 26.85% 22.94% 60.21% CO:Fa/ 'S. :OB PM' 1 / 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10644 ELLIS AVENUE PO BO%B127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 2212E-0127 (7141222.2411 May 20, 1993 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Executive Committee RE: PROPOSED AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE DISTRICTS' EMPLOYEE COMMUTER PROGRAM TO SUPPORT COMPLIANCE WITH SCAQMD REGULATION XV Background. In 1987 the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) adopted Regulation XV as one means of reducing emissions from mobile sources in the South Coast Air Basin. Rule 1501 requires the Districts to implement an Employee Commuter Program designed to achieve an Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) goal of 1.5. In May 1989 the Boards approved the Districts' initial Employee Commuter Program. The Program was amended in March 1990 to add vanpooling and paid time-off incentives for Ridesharing. The plan has been approved by SCAQMD, and includes Rideshare incentives intended to encourage employees to participate in multiple occupancy vehicle usage or other alternate means of transportation and result in an AVR of at least 1.5. The latest employee ridership survey taken in February of 1993 shows that our AVR is currently 1.53 at Plant No. 1 and 1. 67 at Plant No. 2, representing a modest decline from 1992 figures. Vanpool Program. In March 1990 the Boards authorized implementation of a Vanpool Program, initially utilizing two Districts' owned vans on a trial basis. one was an existing eight passenger Motor Pool van used during the normal workday for other Districts' activities, and one new van was authorized to be purchased. Expansion of the program was predicated on the success of the initial venture, and a continuing need to meet Regulation XV AVR goals. The Districts have operated two vanpool routes for over two years. The twelve passenger van is utilized to transport employees from the South orange County area, and has functioned at full capacity since its inception. The eight passenger van transports employees from the Riverside-Moreno Valley area, and is also operated at full capacity. The employees enjoying the benefits of vanpool ridesharing pay the cost of operating and maintaining the van. Presently, the cost for participation in r EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - May 20, 1993 page 2 the South Orange County vanpool is $24 per month, and the cost of the Riverside-Moreno Valley vanpool is $48 per month. The Districts' initial Vanpool Program has successfully demonstrated a cost-effective means of alternate transportation for twenty employees and is a major reason that we are able to meet the Regulation XV target. Currently, there is a long waiting list for both existing and prospective routes. Opportunities for Vanpool Expansion. Employee demographics predict the success of additional vanpool routes from the Riverside area, South County and along the 605/405 freeway corridor from Los Angeles County. In support of this notion, our own employee survey indicates a strong interest and suggests that full occupancy would be achieved on the first day of operation. Effect of Vanpooling on AVR Goals. The AVR impact within the Districts' Vanpool Program far exceeds the potential of other forms of ridesharing. For that reason, the vanpool concept plays a pivotal role in the Districts' continued achievement of the currently mandated AVR of 1.5, and will have an even greater effect should SCAQMD proposals to increase the AVR goal become a reality. The Districts' current AVR is 1.53 at Plant No. 1, and 1.67 at N%/ Plant No. 2. Enhancement of the present Vanpool Program represents one of the more attractive and cost effective alternatives to assure continuing compliance with the AVR goal of 1.5. VANPOOL RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Directors authorize the expansion of the present Vanpool Program through the purchase of up to three additional vanpool vehicles, increasing the fleet to five vehicles. VANPOOL ROUTES Existino Proposed Additional New Total South County 1 1 2 Riverside 1 1 2 405/605 Corridor 1 1 TOTALS 2 3 5 • EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - May 20, 1993 page 3 VANPOOL RECOMMENDATION: (CON-T. ) . one new van would be added to the South County Route; • One new van would be added to the Riverside area route; • One new van would replace the existing Riverside area van (the 1987 Dodge van that was transferred from the motor pool in the original program implementation) which would be utilized on the proposed new 405/605 freeway corridor route. The approximate one-time cost for acquisition of the 12 passenger vans, including the "commuter package", is estimated not to exceed $78,000 plus sales tax. The total cost amortized over seven years would be approximately $12,000 per year. The operating costs would continue to be the responsibility of the Vanpool Program participants. All other provisions of the currently authorized program would remain in effect as described in the attached statement of the Employee Commuter Program. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA F 109«ELLI6 AVENUE PO BOX 6127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92726-6127 171419622411 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY EMPLOYEE COMMUTER PROGRAM Adopted May 10, 1989 Amendment No. 1, April 11, 1990 Proposed Amendment No. 2, May 20, 1991 GOAL: The goal of the program is to achieve through Ridesharing an Average Vehicle Ridership of at least 1.5 at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 by the target dates as required by Regulation XV of the South Coast Air Quality Management District. RIDESNARE DEFINED: Ridesharing includes alternate means of transportation such as: carpool, vanpool, walking, bus or bicycle use. PROGRAM ELEMENTS: 1. 9180 compressed bi-weekly work schedule. 2. Allowing flexibility in the establishment of work hours to facilitate vanpool and other Ridesharing participation. 3. Designation of preferential parking spaces for Rideshare vehicles. 4. Operation of a Vanpool Program offering Districts' provided vans with the following provisions: • The cost of operating the van would be recovered from the participating employees, with the driver paying a reduced amount. • The Districts would subsidize up to three empty seats for up to three months when employee participation turnover occurs to keep the fares consistent and to give participants time to recruit new riders. • Prospective new participants will receive one free month as an encouragement for trying vanpooling (to be subsidized by the Districts) . EMPLOYEE COMMUTER PROGRAM - page 2 • All participants will be required to sign a Vanpooling Agreement approved by the General Counsel setting forth the conditions of vanpool participation. 5. Provision of a computerized carpool ridership matching service and routing assistance. 6. Utilization of certain fleet vehicles currently authorized to be driven between home and work by employees subject to emergency call-out for ridesharing purposes, as practical. 7. Guaranteed Ride Home Program utilizing certain fleet vehicles in the event a Rideshare participant cannot return home at the normally scheduled departure of their carpool or vanpool. 8. installation and maintenance of bike racks at each plant as well as locker room and shower facilities. 9. Conversion of in-plant vehicles used in Operations and Maintenance activities to electric power as appropriate. 10. Conversion of fleet vehicles to alternate clean fuel systems as appropriate. 11. Providing additional paid time off: employees Ridesharing at least 60 percent of the time during a calendar quarter would accrue 4.5 hours of paid time off for that quarter, to be taken off in the same calendar year; employees Ridesharing at least 90 percent of the time would accrue 6.75 hours per calendar quarter. 12. Parking fees will be implemented in the event Districts' employees are unsuccessful in meeting SCAQMD mandated Average Vehicle Ridership goals by July 1, 1991, or in any subsequent quarterly period if such goal is not met. Said fee shall be $15 per month effective July 1, 1991, and increase to $30 per month effective July 1, 1992 . Once the Parking Fee Program is implemented, it shall thereafter remain in effect. Revenues generated by the Parking Fee Program shall be used to offset other costs attributable to the Employee Commuter Program. 13. Rideshare incentives are established at the discretion of the Boards of Directors and are subject to change by the Boards at any time. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 91 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1 C844 ELLIS AVENUE Pa 80A fi gl EWNTAIN VALLE v,CAUfDPMA 92129-6127 ptl1962R111 May 19, 1993 STAFF REPORT Overview of New Air Duality operating Permit Program Pursuant to the 1990 Federal Clean Air Act BACKGROUND The Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) was amended by Congress and signed into law on November 15, 1990. The amendments made to the FCAA established a number of new requirements. One of these is an Operating Permit Program (OPP) , which is a federally mandated program that was incorporated as Title V of the FCAA. In July 1992, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated the OPP Final Rule which set forth the development and implementation of local OPP's. The OPP is to provide a more targeted regulatory implementation system, similar to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Program under the �..i Clean Water Act. Its intent is to serve the same role for implementation and enforcement of air quality requirements for the FCAA. REGULATORY RESPONSIBILITY The OPP requires states or agencies designated by the state to develop and implement this program. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is the designated responsible agency for developing and implementing the OPP for the South Coast Air Basin. The proposed OPP SCAQMD develops is required to be submitted to the California Air Resources Board (CARB) by September 15 1993. CARS is required to submit this to EPA by November 15, 1993, and within one year, EPA must approve or disapprove the state's OPP. INCREASED PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The SCAQMD is proposing to integrate their existing program with the required OPP. This will reduce the complexity of having to deal with two permit systems. However, the OPP will have additional requirements over the existing program that will impact the Districts' Air Quality Compliance Program. Some key changes are the following: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS' of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 108m ELL150vENVE + 20 BOX 9127 FOUNTNN VALLEY U IFOANIn 92721 71.12622.11 Staff Report: Overview of operating Permit Program May 19, 1993 Page Two of Three • The operating permit will have to be renewed every five years. This will require public notification and the approval of both SCAQMD and EPA. Under our current permit program, only SCAQMD approves permits and the permits have an indefinite life. • The operating permit application will require the Districts' principal executive officer or ranking elected official to certify all information. In addition, the Executive Officer must certify compliance with all permit requirements and applicable rules annually. • The operating permit will require identifying all emissions from permitted and non-permitted equipment along with all applicable regulating rules. • The operating permit will require all alternative operating scenario's to be identified. • Significant permit modifications will require public notification and SCAQMD and EPA approval. The Districts will be required to submit an application for an OPP during 1995. The exact date for this requirement depends on when EPA approves the state's OPP. The main issue facing the Districts at this time is the preparation of the application for the operating permit. This will involve a number of issues. It is critical that our application information be comprehensive to provide as much flexibility for our operations as possible. IMPACT ON WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The impact on the Districts due to this new federal requirement will result in additional staff and consultant's time to meet the requirements of the OPP, and it will create delays for obtaining permits to construct for our expansion programs. Delays may be as long as an additional 180 days due to public review and comment and EPA approval. Presently, the Districts' Air Quality Staff is actively participating in SCAQMD development of this COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA foam E41s AVENUE PO BOX 8 +2> FIXMMiN VAtLEY.UUfO1MA 92>2B- W n+aresz.u++ Staff Report: Overview of Operating Permit Program May 19> 1993 Page Three of Three program. It is our goal to assure that SCAQMD does not go beyond federal requirements and the OPP is implemented to be as flexible as possible. FUTURE STATUS UPDATES Staff to continue to track and comment on proposed development of OPP for this air basin and to periodically report to the Directors on the requirements and impacts of this new program. ..r EMT:dk Reff340098.rp COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS M ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA ' 1p ELLIS AVEWE PO W.0127 VALL VUW" EY.MIMM A 92725A127 910952R<11 May 19, 1993 STAFF REPORT SCAOMD Air Toxic Rules 1401 i 1402 BACKGROUND In June of 1990, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Governing Board of Directors adopted Rule 1401, New Source Review for Carcinogenic Air Contaminants. This rule requires facilities to quantify carcinogenic air emissions from new equipment or processes, and to install Best Available Control Technology (BACT) if the carcinogenic risk to the community impacted by the equipment or process exceeded one-in-a-million. The Districts are subject to the requirements of Rule 1401 on several new projects, including: the Central Power Generation System, Primary Clarifier Expansion at Plant No. 1, Installation of New Waste Gas Flares at Both Plants, and Expansion of Secondary Treatment Processes at Both Plants. In all cases, the Districts expended considerable money to source test our processes, model emissions, perform health risk assessments, and install control systems that met BACT standards. SCAQMD staff is now proposing amendments to Rule 1401 and is proposing Rule 1402, Control of Air Toxic Contaminants from Existing Sources. These two rules, if adopted, will greatly expand SCAQMD's authority to regulate toxic air emissions in this basin. While Districts' staff supports sound environmental regulation that protects public health, we believe that the threshold standard established for Proposed Rule 1402 is without scientific basis and will place an undue economic hardship on sewerage facilities without a demonstratable reduction in risk to the community. The purpose of this staff report is to summarize the major impacts and concerns with both proposed rules. KEY REQUIREMENTS OF PROPOSED ROLES SCAQMD staff is proposing a carcinogenic risk action level for Rule 1402, of 10-in-a-million. This risk action level would trigger a facility to develop a risk reduction plan which will identify the steps the facility will take to reduce risk below 10-in-a-million within five years. Based on previous testing, the Districts' theoretical risk to the maximum exposed individual at both plants was approximately 20-in-a-million. Therefore, we `� would be subject to this risk reduction requirement and COUNTY SANITATION OISTOICTS� 41 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1p844 ELLIS AVENUE ' PO.BBN 812, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA B2]28 U14186b24H �/Staff Report: SCAQMD Air Toxic Rules 1401 i 1402 May 19, 1993 Page Two of Three potentially have to install expensive control equipment. Cost does not appear to be a major factor in determining the type of control technology or whether a facility would have to install it to reduce emissions. Rule language does include terms such as "not technically feasible, " or "unreasonable economic burden." The language is very vague and it is unclear as to what conditions an essential public service, such as a sewerage facility, must meet to demonstrate whether a control technology places an undue economic burden on it. Theoretically, a Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) could end up spending hundreds of thousands, or even millions of dollars without demonstration of any measurable benefit to the community to justify the cost. The last significant issue is that the rules do not clarify the issue of reporting non-detectable compounds. The following summarizes the key issues: 1. SCAQMD's proposal to set an action level at 10-in-a-million is not supported by data demonstrating that the controls enforced on sources to control these toxic emissions will significantly, or even moderately, reduce the risk to individuals in this air basin (SCAQMD staff estimates that the average background carcinogenic risk is 1300-in-one- million) . Yet, sources could end up spending millions of dollars controlling these emissions. 2. Health risk assessments prepared by sources under AS 2588 in 1989, have not yet been approved by SCAQMD. Yet, SCAQMD staff is proposing to establish Rule 1402, which is based upon the results of the AS 2588 health risk assessment reports. It is premature to proceed with rulemaking before the health risk assessment results are approved and all parties (SCAQMD, sources, and environmental groups) understand the relative impacts on the community of these emissions. ` COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS oI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 102m ews AWWE F 0..BOX Mn \ i F W..vLLlFr,CAL6011NIA 92728.0127 Staff Report: SCAQMD Air Toxic Rules 1401 i 1402 May 19, 1993 Page Three of Three 3. SCAQMD's socioeconomic report on the proposed rules was only released last week, yet the proposed rules are scheduled .for board action in June of this year. Because of the complexity of these rules and the potentially significant cost impact, more time is needed to review and comment on this document before the rules go to the SCAQMD Board. 4. The rules, as proposed, do not adequately clarify "not technically feasible" and "unreasonable economic burden." A task force or working group was to be established to address these issues along with the issue of non-detectable reporting. To date, however, these issues have not been resolved. STAFF ACTION Staff will continue to monitor the development of the following rules to the Directors and to provide comments to SCAQMD. Specific recommendations to SCAQMD will include: 1. Delay rulemaking on Rule 1402 until the AB 2588 health risk assessment reports are approved by SCAQMD and their impact relative to other factors that affect the risk to the community is evaluated, and key issues such as "not technically feasible, " "unreasonable economic burden," and non-detectable reporting are resolved. 2. Allow an additional 30 days to review and comment on the socioeconomic report prior to proceeding with any rulemaking. Staff will periodically report back to the Directors the status of these rules as they evolve and on the compliance requirements placed on the Districts. EMT:dk �✓ Ref#340099.rp COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 1` of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 BLUE AVENUE O.O.BOX 8127 �l FOUNTAIN VALLEY.MMAMA B2MM127 01418622411 May 19, 1993 STAFF REPORT SCAOMD RECLAIM Proaram BACKGROUND In 1991, the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) embarked on a new program to bring the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) into attainment with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) . This new program called the Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM) is proposing to provide sources flexibility in reducing emissions by not mandating that specific control equipment be installed, but rather establishing maximum emission caps for each facility and requiring that sources annually reduce their emissions in whatever manner they deem to be the most cost-effective. Annual emission reductions would be accomplished by either over-controlling an emission source at a facility or purchasing emission reduction credits (ERCs) from an emissions broker. ESSENTIAL PUBLIC SERVICES EXEMPTION In mid 1992, the essential public services community (including sewage facilities) convinced the SCAQMD Board of Directors that we should be exempt from the RECLAIM program. Our argument was that it did not make sense to place public funds into the open market to compete against private industries for ERCs to offset new construction. If we were forced to enter this ERC market, we believed that our ability to provide wastewater treatment services to the community would be in jeopardy if we were unable to obtain ERCs to permit new facilities to meet increased population growth; or, as a less severe scenario but still undesirable, that we would have to raise sewer use fees to offset the high cost of purchasing ERCs. COMMUNITY BANK i PRIORITY RESERVE ERCs Even though we are exempt from RECLAIM rules, RECLAIM is such a significant SCAQMD program that it is effecting non-RECLAIM facilities in many ways. Of major concern to small businesses \/ and some essential public services, and the purpose of this staff COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTSI of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA 108$0 EWB AVENUE OO,BOX 0127 E WANVM .GLROPMA 8272k , wose2s.n �.Br Staff Report: SCAQMD RECLAIM Program May 19, 1993 Page Two of Three report, is the issue of how RECLAIM may adversely effect the continued access and use of the Community Bank (Bank) and Priority Reserve (Reserve) . The Bank and Reserve were established under SCAQMD's New Source Review regulations to ensure that small businesses and essential public services would have the emissions required to offset new growth. Emission offsets from the Bank and Reserve are made available to small businesses and essential public services at no cost. As a result of SCAQMD staff's analysis of the Bank and Reserve for the RECLAIM program, they have concluded that there is an imbalance associated with the Bank and Reserve, in that, non- RECLAIM facilities and exempt sources (mostly small businesses and some essential public services) , create the primary demand on the Bank and Reserve while RECLAIM facilities are the primary ` I source that supply the Bank and Reserve. As currently proposed by SCAQMD staff, the New Source Review Program (which the Bank and Reserve fall under) will be separate for RECLAIM and non-RECLAIM facilities. What this means is that the Bank and Reserve will no longer exist and small businesses and some essential public services will no longer have free access to emissions to offset new growth in this air basin. Districts' Director and Councilman John Cox and business representative, Ed Laird, who both sit on the RECLAIM Steering Committee and represent the Interagency Implementation committee (IAIC) and Small Business Community, respectively, have been alerted to this situation and have communicated our concern to SCAQMD staff. In addition, Districts' staff and staff of other essential public services, have expressed their concern on this issue to SCAQMD officials on several occasions. Even though we have been expressing our concern to SCAQMD for several months, the proposed RECLAIM rules that are scheduled to go before the SCAQMD governing board on July 15th and 16th of this year, do not resolve this problem. Thus, if adopted, an undue economic hardship on non-RECLAIM facilities could result. L COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 21 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA L 1p6AC ELLIB AVENUE PO.BON 812) FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 82126.8127 V 7141 B62-2411 Staff Report: SCAQMD RECLAIM Program May 19, 1993 Page Three of Three RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Joint Chairman send a letter to the SCAQMD governing Board requesting that rule making on RECLAIM be delayed until the imbalance associated with the Community Bank and Reserve is resolved. A draft of the proposed letter is attached. EMT:dk Attachment Ref/340096.rp i ATTACIMENT - Draft Letter May 26, 1993 Mr. Henry Wedaa, Chairman South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 E. Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Subject: Request to delay RECLAIM rulemaking pending resolution of certain issues Dear Chairman Wedaa: On July 15th and 16th of this year, the Governing Board of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) will consider adopting several Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM) rules of which Proposed Rule 2005, New Source Review for RECLAIM. The purpose of this letter is to request that the Board delay rulemaking on RECLAIM until the issues discussed below are resolved. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Sanitation Districts) have serious concerns with this proposed rule because it will interfere with our ability to provide non-discretionary essential public services and impair our ability to comply with mandated water quality standards. Furthermore, this proposed rule will severely impact the ability of a small businessperson to operate in this region, significantly impacting the viability of our communities. Our concerns regarding the RECLAIM New Source Review (NSR) Rule are more specifically summarized below: • SCAQMD analysis of the Community Bank and Priority Reserve have concluded that there is an imbalance in that non- RECLAIM facilities and exempt sources (mostly small businesses and some essential public services) create the primary demand while RECLAIM facilities are the primary supply source. i 1, Mr. Henry Wedaa, Chairman May 26, 1993 l 1 Page Two of Two • SCAQMD has verbally indicated that the New Source Review Rule in RECLAIM meets all of the federal requirements and no further effort will be expended on the RECLAIM New Source Review Rule. The proposed New Source Review Rule 2005 does not resolve this problem. This infers that problems associated with the imbalance of the Community Bank and Priority Reserve must be dealt with in the framework of the non-RECLAIM New Source Review Program. • We do not believe that the supply/demand imbalance of the Community Bank and Priority Reserve can •rbe resolved solely within the non-RECLAIM framework. We also believe that if the RECLAIM rules are adopted as currently proposed, then non-RECLAIM facilities will experience undue hardship due to the RECLAIM program. This is not our understanding of the intent of the RECLAIM program. Therefore, we regretfully request that SCAQMD delay adopting any RECLAIM rules until SCAQMD can resolve the supply/demand imbalance of the Community Bank and Priority Reserve and ensure that emission credits will be available to offset new construction for not only essential public services, but also small businesses. As always, we stand ready to work closely with the SCAQMD towards meeting our common environmental and public health protection goals. Sincerely, William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman EMT/dk Ref#340097.ltr cc: SCAQMD Board Members I 1 1 ,,\\IATIOh SCAQMD RECLAIM PROGRAM N p AhGE C 00N` What is RECLAIM? • A market based approach to reducing criteria pollutant emissions in this air basin. • The purpose is to provide sources flexibility in complying with SCAQMD Rules and thus, reduce cost. • The first program of its kind in the nation. Air Quality Division May 26, 1993 Page 1 5^Nyel d,Oh OI SCAQMD RECLAIM PROGRAM y�' bs'° 9 O Rq'GE How does RECLAIM effect us? • Essential Public Services are exempt from Reclaim Rules. • However, RECLAIM's impact is carrying over to Non-RECLAIM facilities. • Free access to Community Bank and Priority Reserve for emission offsets is in jeopardy. Air Quality Division May 26, 1993 Page 2 I I , , 1 ^N1'M1EIOry O SCAQMD RECLAIM PROGRAM Si.v.19S1 N` p 'S'GE Cod What is the Community Bank and Priority Reserve? • Emission Reserves established under New Source Review Rule to provide emission offsets to : 1 . Small Businesses 2. Essential Public Services • Emission offsets are made available at no cost to source. Air Quality Division May 26, 1993 Page 3 nHttnip^, SCAQMD RECLAIM PROGRAM p SIe p�n'GE coo What is the Problem? • Community Bank and Priority Reserve are supplied by RECLAIM Sources (shutdowns, offsets). • Non-RECLAIM sources place the demand on the Community Bank and Priority Reserve. • SCAQMD staff is proposing to keep the RECLAIM and Non-RECLAIM New Source Review Programs separate. • Thus, the Community Bank and Priority Reserve will not be able to meet future demand of Non- RECLAIM Sources. Air Quality Division May 26, 1993 Page 4 F 1t.TlG , SCAQMD RECLAIM PROGRAM 0 Jbw tl1 AHGE COOtl` Impact on the Sanitation Districts is... • Less severe due to our internal banking on NMHC and CO emission offsets. • Our future demand for NOx emission offsets would be minimal due to our Central Power Generation Engines. • However, construction of future Reclamation plants and future years construction at Plant No. 1 and 2 will impact us. Air Quality Division May 26, 1993 Page 5 S .e w.'oN fir SCAQMD RECLAIM PROGRAM p pINGE CGU Staff Recommendation • Have Joint Chairman send letter to SCAQMD Board requesting delay of RECLAIM Rulemaking until this problem is resolved . • Testify at the July SCAQMD Board Meeting in support of our recommendations. Air Quality Division May 26, 1993 Page 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA May 18, 1993 10844 ELLIS AVENUE 0o BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92726-6127 0141 9 6 2-2411 STAFF REPORT Proposed Change Order No. 2 to Contract with Cooper Industries for Purchase of Spark-ignited Engines for Use in Central Power Generation Systems Job No. J-19A. Job No. J-19A, with Cooper Industries, is a $21 million contract to supply eight large engine-generating sets and associated auxiliary systems for the new $70.0 million Central Power Generation Systems at both treatment plants. As the manufacturer of the engines and supplier of the associated auxiliary engine equipment, Cooper-Industries supplies the essential spare parts and equipment for the routine maintenance and emergency repair of the systems. One of the lessons we have learned in the course of the recent engine rehabihation work is that there is a very long lead time for delivery of certain parts and equipment. It is therefore important that the Districts to inventory certain items to avoid lengthy downtime of the system when undergoing maintenance or repairs because they are not available on a "just-in-case" basis. This proposed change order is for eight added items and one deleted item, adding a net of $333,149.82 plus tax and delivery charges to the contract, most of which is for spare parts and equipment. Item 1, a credit of $4,985.65, deletes some spare parts from the original purchase contract's list of suggested spare parts prepared by Cooper Industries. The list included some parts that were common for a similar type of engine, an engine able to burn either diesel or natural gas as a fuel, but were not necessary for the final equipment supplied for these facilities. Item 2, in the amount of $86,458.93 plus sales tax and freight charges, is for additional spare parts related to the engines that were not in the original J-19A that are necessary parts for maintenance and repair of the engine systems. Also included in the total is an additional, spare turbocharger for the Fountain Valley facility. The original specification listed one spare unit for the 16-cylinder engines In the Huntington Beach system but no spare unit for the 12-cylinder engines at the Fountain Valley facility. Item 3, in the amount of $24,814.70 plus sales tax and freight charges, is the addition of spare parts to provide the necessary equipment for repair and maintenance of the engine auxiliary systems, such as coolers, pumps and fittings, to prevent possible lengthy downtime of the engine/generator systems. Item 4, in the amount of $34,233.20 plus sales tax and freight charges, provides additional spare parts for the computer monitoring systems which are necessary to prevent prolonged down time of the engines while maintenance or repair of the computer is being performed. The spare parts include items such as spare printed circuit boards of each type installed, memory cards and interface cards. Item 5, in the amount of $87,757.75 plus sales tax and freight charges, provides for certain consumable items that the engines require for routine maintenance at specific time intervals as required by the engine manufacturer. For example, filter elements (not lubricating oil filters), gaskets, sparkplugs and other associated pieces to keep the engines available for service at all times and maintain the warranty requirements set by the engine manufacturer. Item 6, in the amount of $12,500.00 plus sales tax and freight charges, provides for additional computer programming at both plants. The computer monitoring system provided by Cooper with the engines provides data for the operators to use and provides a historical record of how well the system is performing. With additional programming, the one computer will monitor all critical building systems. The work to be done by Cooper Industries will eliminate the need for an additional workstation in the generation facility, and better utilize the equipment that has already been acquired. The Districts built two new digester gas compressor facilities to replace existing equipment that had reached the end of its service life. The new equipment provides digester gas for utilization in the Central Power Generation System engines. Use of the digester gas is what allows us to produce power so economically for use in the treatment facilities. These new compressors were built by Pennsylvania Compressor, owned by Cooper Industries. Item 7, in the amount of $51,096.00 plus sales tax and freight charges, provides for additional spare parts in order to have critical replacement parts available on site to prevent excessive down time to the systems, and reduce the chance of interruption of fuel to the engines. The contract specifications state that the engine supplier would provide qualified factory-trained personnel to provide operational training for Districts' personnel. One phase of the training is five days of classroom and hands-on training at Cooper's facilities in Mount Vernon, Ohio. Employee expenses for the training, including travel, per diem and lodging were to have been paid by the 2 1 • Districts. Instead, staff arranged for Cooper to send two trainers to the Huntington Beach Plant for the training thereby eliminating considerable expense and also assuring the Districts' personnel did not have to be off the job for the five days (plus two days travel time). Item 8, in the amount of $7,639.89, covers travel costs which were incurred by Cooper for providing the training at the plants. The net out-of-pocket savings to the Districts for this change was estimated to be $5,000. Additional training for the Districts operation and maintenance staff for Plant No. 1 is requested due to the extended amount of time since the last training noted above. Operator turn-over necessitates the need for additional training. This training will include not only the same training previously received by Plant No. 2 staff, but will also provide detailed training on the computer systems and maintenance requirements not included in the original documents. Item 9, for an amount not exceed $36,700.00, includes a credit of $7,920.00 for two days of training owed to the Districts that have not been utilized. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 for a net addition of $333,149.82 plus applicable taxes and freight to the contract with Cooper Industries, Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. TMD:jt wpdoc\sng\com tte\eN52693.sr 3 Page 1 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Two (2) DATE: June 9. 1993 CONTRACTOR: C000er Industries, Inc.. C000er-Bessemer Reciprocating, Energy Services Grouo JOB: ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SPARK-IGNITED ENGINES FOR USE IN CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS. JOB NO. J-19A. Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Dedeet) $ 333,149.82 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - DELETE SPARE PARTS The purchase agreement provides for a number of spare parts as recommended by Cooper- Bessemer for five LSVB-I6-SGC engine generator sets and three LSVB-I2-SGC engine generator sets. The list included parts that were common for similar type engines, that is, an engine capable of burning either diesel or natural gas as a fuel. However, this was not the final type of engine supplied and, therefore, many parts were not needed. The manufacturer agreed to accept a return of the unneeded spare parts and provide the Districts with a credit on a negotiated basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)A of the General Provisions. (Reference Cooper Industries letter dated April 2, 1992.) CREDIT THIS COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 (4,985.65) ITEM 2 - PURCHASE ADDITIONAL SPARE PARTS FOR ENGINES The spare parts provided in the purchase agreement were parts for the routine maintenance of the eight engines. However, additional part changes have been identified by staff as necessary to provide a complete set of spares. This includes items such as a spare turbo-charger rotor for the Fountain Valley facility and its 12-cylinder engine, whereby one was provided for the 16-cylinder Huntington Beach facility. (Reference Cooper Industries letter dated April 12, 1993 and revised quote dated February 17, 1993.) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 86,458.93 (plus tax and freight) Page 2 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Two (2) DATE: June 9. 1993 CONTRACTOR: Cooper Industries Inc.. Cooper-Bessemer Reciprocating. Energy Services Group JOB: ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SPARK-IGNITED ENGINES FOR USE IN CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS, JOB NO. J-19A. ITEM 3 - PURCHASE SPARE PARTS FOR AUXILIARY SYSTEMS The purchase agreement did not provide spare parts for the auxiliary systems that were supplied with the eight engine/generator packages. These parts are necessary for the repair and maintenance for auxiliary equipment such as coolers, pumps and fittings and prevent lengthy down time of engines. (Reference Cooper Industries letter dated April 2, 1992 and revised quote dated March 25, 1993.) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 24,814.70 (plus tax and freight) ITEM 4 - PURCHASE SPARE PARTS FOR COMPUTER MONITORING SYSTEMS The purchase agreement did not provide spare parts for the computer monitoring systems that was supplied with the eight engine/generator packages. These parts are necessary for the repair and maintenance of the computer equipment. The spare parts consist of printed circuit boards, memory cards and interface face cards. (Reference Cooper Industries quote dated February 9, 1993 and letter dated March 25, 1993.) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 34,223.20 (plus tax and freight) Page 3 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Two (2) DATE:_ June 9. 1993 CONTRACTOR: Cooper Industries. Inc.. Cooper-Bessemer Reciprocating, Enerav Services Group JOB: ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SPARK-IGNITED ENGINES FOR USE IN CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS. JOB NO. J-19A, ITEM 5 - PURCHASE CONSUMABLE ITEMS OF ENGINES The purchase agreement did not provide spare parts for certain consumable items for the eight engine/generator packages. These parts are necessary for the routine maintenance at specific time intervals as required by the engine manufacturer. The consumable items consist of filter elements (not lubricating oil filters), gaskets, spark plugs and other associated pieces to keep the engines available for service at all times and maintain the warranty requirements set by the engine manufacturer. (Reference Cooper Industries letter dated March 25, 1993.) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 87,757.75 (plus tax and freight) ITEM 6 - ADDITIONAL COMPUTER PROGRAMMING The computer monitoring systems provided in the purchase agreement resulted in limited data associated in the operation of the eight engine/generator packages. Staff has determined that with the additional computer programming there would be available to operators a historical record of how well the systems are performing. Also, one computer could monitor all critical building systems. This, in turn, would eliminate the need for an additional workstation in the generation facility and better utilize the equipment that has already been acquired. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 12,500.00 Page 4 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE �..i FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Two (2) DATE: June 9. 1993 CONTRACTOR: Cooper Industries, Inc.. Cooper-Bessemer Reciprocatina, Energy Services Group JOB: ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SPARK-IGNITED ENGINES FOR USE IN CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS, JOB NO. J-19A. ITEM 7 - PURCHASE SPARE PARTS FOR GAS COMPRESSORS The Districts built two new digester gas compressor facilities, one at Plant 1 and another at Plant 2, to replace existing equipment that had reached the end of their service life. There are six new electric driven compressors, three at each plant, which replace old engine driven compressors. The new equipment provides digester gas for the utilization in the eight central power generation engines for producing economical power for use in the `.� treatment facilities. Spare parts are required by the maintenance staff to ensure the availability of critical replacement parts on site to prevent excessive down time to the systems and reduce the chance of interruption of fuel to the engines. (Reference Cooper Industries letter dated March 15, 1993.) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 51,096.00 (plus tax and freight) ITEM 8 - ENGINE OPERATIONS TRAINING The contract specifications state the Supplier shall provide qualified factory trained personnel to train the Districts personnel. One phase of the training is five days (40 hours) of classroom and hands on training at the Supplier's facilities in Mount Vernon, Ohio, for up to ten District personnel. Expenses for the District's personnel would have been paid by the District. Staff arranged for the Supplier to send two training specialists to Huntington Beach, Plant 2, for the training, thereby saving considerable expense and also assuring personnel did not have to be off the job for the five days. Costs are based on a time and actual expense basis. (Reference: District letter dated March 5, 1992.) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 7,639.89 Page 5 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Two (2) DATE: June 9. 1993 CONTRACTOR: Cooper Industries. Inc.. Cooper-Bessemer Reciprocating Energy Services Group JOB: ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SPARK-IGNITED ENGINES FOR USE IN CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS, JOB NO J-19A. ITEM 9 - ADDITIONAL ENGINE OPERATIONS TRAINING The purchase agreement states that the engine supplier would provide qualified factory trained personnel for operational training for Districts operation and maintenance staff. This training was provided for Plant 2 because the completion of Plant 2 was considerably ahead of that at Plant 1. However, due to the delay in Plant 2, creating personnel turn- over and reassignment additional training is required at Plant 1. Also, this training will provide detailed information of the computer systems and updated maintenance requirements. The item included a credit of $7,920.00 for days of training not received at Plant 2. (Reference Cooper Industries letter dated December 4, 1992.) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 33,645.00 TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 333,149.82• •Plus tax and freight on applicable items. Page 6 of 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE _ FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Two (2) DATE: June 9. 1993 CONTRACTOR: Cooper Industries Inc C000er-Bessemer Reciorocatina Energy Services Group JOB: ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SPARK-IGNITED ENGINES FOR USE IN CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS. JOB NO. J-19A. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 9, 1989 Original Contract Time '480 Calendar Days Original Completion Date ' Time Extension this Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 0 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date ' Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable '480 calendar days to deliver engines and spare parts. Open-ended to complete final testing. Original Contract Price $ 18,968,113.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1,700,132.00 This Change (Add) (Dedeet) $ 333.149.82" Amended Contract Price $ 21,001,394.82 **Plus tax and freight on applicable items. Page 7 of 7 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Two (2) DATE: June 9. 1993 CONTRACTOR: Cooper Industries, Inc.. Cooper-Bessemer Reciorocatinc Energy Services Group JOB: ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASE CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF SPARK-IGNITED ENGINES FOR USE IN CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS, JOB NO. J-19A Board Authorization Date: June 9, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: Engineering Manager Date Co struction Manager Date APPF,QyED BY- APPROVED AS TO FORM: Director of Engineering Date Ge al Counsel Date COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC ACCEPTED BY: p Contract r Date J-199\CD.2 p COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA loeaa Ew AVENUE MWMN Va y.MIM MN W728.8121 RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS JUNE 9, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. u a F( O 9299 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL REPORT SNINb UMBEADATE 94/29/93 FAGL 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGL COUNTY �+ CLAIMS PAIL L5105/93 POSTING UATE L5/45/93 S WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT UESCNIPiION 129520 NEE MEMBERSHIP SA35.00 POWER GENERATION ASSOCIATION 129522 AS TECH COMPANY 4133.911.20 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-8-91 129522 AMERICAN TELEPHONE S TELEGRAPH $1.259.74 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 129523 A 1 A 1 S330.39 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 129524 ACTION DUOR REPAIR CORP 51.850.6b BUILDING REPAIRS 129525 ACTION RENTALS $315.4. RENTAL EQUIPMENT 229526 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP $16.323.73 ENGINE SERVICES M.O.11-18-92 129527 AMLRICAN CABLING 1 COMM f:.a81.49 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 129528 AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY $415.00 SUBSCRIPTION 129529 AMERICAN HI-LIFT $76.07 TRUCK PARTS 129530 AMER SOCIETY FOR MICRUBIOLG 1476.4U LAB SUPPLIES 'n 129531 ANICON. INC $629.53 LAB SUPPLIES ITT 129532 CITY OF ANAHEIM $59b.4. TRAINING REGISTRATION Z Cl 129533 BLAKE P ANDERSON $53.84 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 229534 ANIAIER - DISTRIBUTION $342.49 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 129535 ANTHONY-3 HECN A MACHINE, THE. 5547.6b MECHANICAL REPAIRS 129536 APPLIED bIOSYSTEMS INC $1.432.36 LAB SUPPLIES rn 129537 ABC LABORATORIES 5b.095.04 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 3 129538 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC 12.851.4b INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES ZIb 229539 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 53.262.03 INSTRUMENT PARTS O0 129540 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SLRV. 4195.OY WASTE OIL REMOVAL 129541 ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES $612.40 LAB SUPPLIES 1 129542 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 52.506.95 PAYROLL SERVICES ]a 129543 AWARDS f TROPHIES $51.24 SERVICE AWARDS r 229544 EFI PORTABLE SERVICES $85.31 EQUIPMENT RENTAL C— 129545 SAX LANDFILL 1,2.9a7.76 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 129546 ORW SAFETY A SUPPLY Sa.a6B.6b SAFETY SUPPLIES 129547 BIG INC. 55.427.28 ELECTRIC PARTS N 12954E HANK OF THE WEST 42,946.31 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION J-23-2 129549 BARCLAYS LAY FUULISHLRS $240.00 SUBSCRIPTION .o 129550 BATTERY SPECIALTILS 5412.73 BATTERIES 229551 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC S4.3U1.1. LAB SUPPLIES -4 129552 BELL SECURITY $679.05 TEMPORARY SERVICES - SECURITY CO 129553 WT BILLARD INC $145.19 REPAIR PARTS 129554 SIOSAFETV SYSTEMS. INC. $69.97 LAB SUPPLIES 129555 BID TECH NETS INC f325.8a SERVICE AGREEMENT 129-56 bLUE RIBBON INC f4.00.OP PLUMBING INSPECTION 129557 BON-A-RUES $112.33 TRUCK PARTS 129558 BOOT BARN $72.75 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 129559 bOYLE ENGINEERING CURP 544.735.35 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-37-3 129560 BROOKS INSTRUMENT DIV. S688.62 SCRUBBER PART 129561 BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTANTS 19,939.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 129562 BUDGET JANITORIAL 55.095.G4 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129563 DUILUER•S EMFORIUM 599.38 HARDWARE/LUMBER 129564 BURKL ENGINEERING CU $56.9b ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 129565 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC f8.36O..c SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL FROCESSING DATE 4/29/93 4AGL . r]a REPORT NUMNER AP43 N LUUNIT SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAID .5/05/93 PUSIING DATE W5/65/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129566 GARY 6 STREED 14.981.51 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 229567 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY $349.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129568 COM BOOKS a207.9G BOOKS 129569 CEN CORPORATION s533.9L LAB SUPPLIES 129570 C M I $451.55 INSTRUMENTS 129571 CRC PRESS INC $52.50 LAB SUPPLIES 129572 CS COMPANY a7.356.6J VALVES 129573 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH IIIC. slul.75 LAB SUPPLIES 129574 CALTROL INC $378.97 REGULATOR PARTS L 129575 CALIF ASSOC OF SAM ALENCIE 17.406.b0 TRAINING REGISTRATION G7 129576 CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS $322.30 LAB SUPPLIES TT1 129577 CARLETON ENGINEERS 51.272.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES Z 129578 JDHN CAROLED EN6INEERS $bS,609.24 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-41, P1-36, P1-34 O 129579 CENTURY SAFETY INST A SUPP 110.950.16 SAFETY SUPPLIES n 129580 CLARK CONSULTANTS 43.840.0u CONSULTING SERVICES 129581 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING 5500.00 STORAGE UNIT 129502 CLEVELAND COTTON FROD s3E9.33 LAB SUPPLIES 3 129583 COLD SPRING HARBOR a1a2.3: LAB SUPPLIES 129584 COLICN AND SONS 51.609.965.85 CONSTRUCTION I-9 qt 129585 CON BYTE USA 52.927.ib CABLE SUPPLIES 00 129506 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA S77O.01 MACHINE PARTS 1 129587 COMPUTER BAT SbG2.32 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 129588 COMPUTER DATACOM a8.184.1b OFFICE SUPPLIES a 129589 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL UIST 56.650.L6 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES r 129590 CONSUMER PIPE 13.C41.37 INSTRUMENT PARTS r 129591 CONTINENTAL CHFMICAL CO a1.b16.i5 CHLORINE M.O. 10-9-91 ty 129592 CONTRACTOR•5 BOOK STORE $100.00 BOOKS L29593 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C 16,213.76 CONSULTING SERVICES N 229594 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC $813.93 ELECTRIC PARTS 129595 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY SZG6.b7 TRUCK PARTS 129596 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 1760.88 ELECTRIC PARTS C� 129597 CA DEFT OF HEALTH SERVICES 43rN7.66 LAB ACCREDITATION PROGRAM y129598 ONE INC 1456.91 ELBCTRIC PARTS 129599 J.W. DIANGELO CO INC 5972.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129600 DANILLS TIRE SERVICE $744.23 TRUCK PARTS 129601 DAPPER TIRE 5486.9a TIRES 1296C2 BE ANZA CORPORATION $150.60 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 129603 DEBIN ENTERPRISES INC s4L7.46 ELECTRIC PARTS 129604 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CU $9,731.62 VALVES 129605 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL a1.897.74 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-12-92 129606 DICKSONS a...98.14 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS 129601 DIFILIFFO ASSOCIATES 51.414.98 PRINTING 129608 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 325.252.67 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 129609 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN s2.188.5b TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 129610 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC 5895.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 129621 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY ELEVATOR REPAIRS 1 N F� 10 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/29/93 PAGE •. � RLP OR NUM6iR AP O3 W GGUNTV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY G LAING PAID Cb/05193 POSTING DATE CS/05/93 WARRANT NO. VLNDOR AN06NT GESCR1PIlON 129612 DRESSER MEASUREMLhT 66.158.76 METER REPAIRS 129613 OUNN EDWARDS COPP $236.02 PAINT SUPPLIES 129614 CURD-SENSE CORP $749.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 129615 D-VALS SALES 3204.96 FITTINGS 129616 EIM CO/NBS SUPPLY $2,903.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129617 EMA SERVICES INC 3836.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2 129628 ESP NORTH 4214.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129619 EASTMAN INC 33,G10.21 OFFICE SUPPLIED 129620 ECOANALYSIS INC Si.313.bb OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 y 129622 ELECT AIR TOOL CO 654.G0 CONVEYOR PART m 129622 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES 53.680.LC ENGINEERING SERVICES Z 129623 ENCHANTER INC $5.060.G0 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 C 129624 ESSCO PUMPS AND CONTROLS 51.703.i6 PUMP PARTS y 129625 ENVIRONMENTAL PROD. USA 61.333.91 TRUCK PARTS 129626 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC $90.5L LAB SUPPLIES 129627 ENVIROTECM CONTROLS INC $112.99 OPERATING SUPPLIES fll 12962E ERSHIGS INC 535.00 FITTINGS 3 129629 ESSENCE GROUP $1.180.16 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 129630 CHARLES EVANS A ASSOC. 358.644.00 CONSULTING SERVICES W 129631 FMC CORPORATION 6160.GL LAB SUPPLIES 129632 FST SAND AND GRAVEL INC 4750.1. ROAD BASE 129633 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5.200.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91 129634 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 6932.25 AIR FREIGHT 3. 129635 FERKELLSAS 527.2+ PROPANE r 129636 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO 3i.506.76 CHLORINATION PARTS 129637 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 3:.311.85 LAB SUPPLIES Yp 129638 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. 9246.GC CONCRETE CUTTING H 229639 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC S406.83 HARDWARE 129640 FOSS MARITIME CO $638.74 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ;0 129641 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA S61.U7 FILM 129662 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 91.067.71 PAINT SUPPLIES C-1 129643 THE FUX80RO CO 31.673.6: INSTRUMENT PARTS C7 129644 FREEDOM IMAGING •63.85 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129645 DST. INC. 5253.21 COMPUTER REPAIRS 129646 GANAHL LUMBER CU $118.6U EMBER 129667 bARAATT-CALLANAN CUMFANY $970.83 CHEMICALS 129660 GENERAL BINDING CORP A193.9i BINDING SERVICES 129649 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 4739.83 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 129650 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $207.69 TELEPHONE SERVICES 129651 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC $1.120.66 MECHANICAL PARTS 129652 N GLANT2 6 SON 3565.07 BUILDING MATERIALS 129653 GOGD3AV TOOLS CORP. ab48.74 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ,. 129654 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 6b77.93 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 129655 THOMAS GRAY A ASSOC INC 964B.00 LAB SERVICES 129656 DON GREEK A ASSOCIATLS 6455.GL SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 129657 HSG TECHNOLOGY 5114.906..2 CONSTRUCTION P2-66 ri w FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/29/93 FA6E 4 y RLPORT NUMUER AP43 I LGUh TY SANITATION OISTRILIS OF ORANGE COUNTY 3= CLAIMS PAID '.3/05/93 POSTING DATE C5/05/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OESLRIPTION 129658 HACH COMPANY $842.39 LAB SUPPLIES 129659 GEORGE I HALL CU $i83.38 ELECTRIC PARTS 129660 HARAINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC s1.154.41 FITTINGS .. 129661 SIM J HARRIS CO $59,223.00 FIBRE OPTIC SYSTEM INSTALL .M.0.8-12-92 129662 HATCH L KIRK INC $3,477.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129663 HAYWARD BAKER s24.980.0W CONSULTING SERVICES 129664 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES i/.546.JC TEMPORARY SERVICES 129665 HEWLETT PACKARD $727.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129666 H/LTI INC 564.67 BATTERY CHARGER n 129667 RS HUGHES CO INC $1,243.54 PAINT SUPPLIES m 129668 HONTING70N BEACH HUBNER S1A s56.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES m 129669 HUNTINGTON VALLCY SCHWINN C 5248.37 BICYCLE PARTS m 129670 HUNTS FINAL FHASL 12.b25.6L CONSTRUCTION SERVICES n 129671 ISC s2.769.00 ELECTRIC SERVICES 129672 IMFENIAL WEST CHEMICAL SN3.W29.27 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 129673 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1,233.73 CONNECTORS 129674 INGRAM PAPER 5933.71I OFFICE SUPPLIES 3 129675 FACTEL TELETRAC 5229.L'0 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 129676 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS Si.084.17 BATTERIES :tt 129677 ISOLAB. INC s247.87 LAB SUPPLIES 00 129678 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUFP $643.49 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES .� 129679 JAYS CATERING $177.79 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE 229680 JOHNSTONE SOFTLY 12.107.59 ELECTRIC PARTS y 129681 KAMAN BEARINGS S SUPPLY SC5b.74 MECHANICAL PARTS P— 129662 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $349.28 MECHANICAL REPAIRS r 129693 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER 5250.4E TRAINING REGISTRATION CJ 129684 KING BEARING INC $1.601.72 MACHINE SUPPLIES 129655 KNOK INOUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 12.G45.47 SAFETY SUPPLIES CA 129686 KROHNE AMERICA INC $327.00 METER 129687 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO $136.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129686 LEE 6 RO CONSULTING ENGM SI.263.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5 n 129689 LEWCO ELECTRIC CU s211.13 TRUCK SUPPLIES 12969C LIQUID AIR CORP 1570.73 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES N 129691 SOCO-LYNCH CORP 51.135.92 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129692 MBC AFPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL 3533.33 OCEAN MONITORING 129693 MFS 1392.11 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 129694 MACOMCO $719.98 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129695 MANTEK $284,33 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 129696 MARVAC ELECTRONICS s9G.22 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129697 MATT - CHLUW INC $499.39 CHLORINATION PARTS 129698 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS S9a.391.23 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT 129E99 MICROAGE OF CERRITOS 170.68 COMPUTER PARTS _ 129700 MIDWAY MFG 6 MACHINING s725.OG MECHANICAL REPAIRS 129701 MILTON ROY CO $598.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129702 MISSION ABRASIVE SUFFLILS $199.19 MECHANICAL PARTS 129103 MISSION INDUSTRIES 14.724.92 UNIFORM RENTALS I F+ 10 9199 - JT UIST HORNING CAPIIAL REPORTSNUNDER DATE P'3/.9/93 #AGE 5 1 ` COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY lIl CLAIMS PAID G5/05/93 POSTING DATE 15/05/13 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129704 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT GO 557:.OL INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 229705 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES $3.495.25 LAB SERVICES 129TC6 MORGAN CRANE CO INC s9.3B3.69 TRUCK PARTS 1297CT MORRISON B FOEKSTER 5811.00 LEGAL SERVICES 329700 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $01.18 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 129709 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTS $119.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 229710 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH s37.J0 WATER USE 129711 Of CORPORATION $3,660.90 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129712 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES s196.92 SAFETY GLASSES 129713 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR HIS 18.669.59 OFFICE FURNITURE a 129714 OX SYSTEMS CO $26.511.13 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 129715 OLYMPIC PARTY SALES 5128.bB LAB SUPPLIES Z 129726 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO FARTS C 358.9b TRUCK PARTS a 229717 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CU $3,133.47 CHEMICALS 129718 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY C 5323.25 CHEMICALS 129719 ORANGE COURIER $534.00 FREIGHT 129720 ORANGE VALVL S FITTING CO. $6.399.46 FITTINGS 3 129721 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.324.88 SPECIALTY GASSES 129722 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $333.1a DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 4t 129723 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 54.291.05 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT 00 229729 PFT INSTRUMENT CO s6.249.56 ENGINE REPAIRS 129725 PGC SCIENTIFICS CORP NATION 5129.1s LAB SUPPLIES 1 129726 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $80.09 TOOL n 229727 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT GO $953.47 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1— 129729 PACIFIC BELL sb96.65 TELEPHONE SERVICES r 129729 PACIFIC WALK-TN MEDICAL $270.30 MEDICAL BEAMS 129730 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C $68.46 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 129731 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 515.954.79 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS V1 129732 PADNE JANITORIAL BUFF $395.33 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129733 PERKIN-ELMER CORPONATIOA sZ53.27 LAB SUPPLIES ti 129734 PIMA ONO SYSTEMS INC 6159.775.53 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 C 129735 PTINEY BUVES CREDIT CORP 5190.5♦ POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE -1 129736 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $17.23 HARDWARE w 129737 PLASTIC INDUSTRIES S164 J9 BOTTLES 129738 POLYMETRICS. INC. $1.436.05 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129739 POLYFURE INC S".133.81 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 129700 POWER ELECTAO SUPPLY CO s.15.9G ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 229741 POWER SYSTEMS $155.19 ENGINE PARTS 129T92 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE s189.00 ICE 129743 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY 41.895.G2 PUMP PARTS 199741 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND• $6.011.99 SOIL TESTING 129745 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. S4.960.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 129746 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES INC 5.3.6Z2.8G COMPUTER SERVICES 129747 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO 4933.63 LAB SUPPLIES 129748 AD SYSTEMS INC 51.995.06 SECURITY CARD READER 129749 RED WING SHOES sl29.13 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 2 a FUND NO 9199 • JT DIST WUPKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE -4/29/93 PALL E a REPORT NUMBER AP43 CUUNIY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COJNIY CLAWS FAIL L5/LS/93 PUATIN6 DATE La/L9/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129750 REDI EXPRESS 3169.20 MESSENGER SERVICES 229751 MCJU14KIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY 18.253.83 FITTINGS 129752 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CORP $113.22 LAB SUPPLIES 129753 RESTFK CORP $1,548.12 LAB SUPPLIES 129754 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO 32.U21.12 CHEMICALS 129755 ROSEMOUNT/UNILUC 41,114.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129756 JOSEPH T RYERSON 8 SON IN $1.160.18 METAL 129757 SAFETY-k LEEN CORP 16.369.77 PARTS CLEANER 229758 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS L7.916.85 LAB SUPPLIES 129759 DOUG SARVIS $1.125.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING m129760 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1,230.50 OFFICE FURNITURE Z 129761 CITY OF SEAL PEACH 11.289.70 WATER USE tG 129762 SHAMROCK SOFTLY 1296.9u ELECTRIC SUPPLIES n 129763 JOSEPH SHOPP $565.39 VEHICLE DAMAGE 129764 SHURELUCK SALES $11,015.W FITTINGS -i 129765 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO $133.13 LAB SUPPLIES 1"PI 129766 SKVPAkK •ALK-IN MEDICAL LET 1801.04 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL BEAMS 3 12976T 50 COAST AIR QUALITY 3i043.U0 PERMIT FEES 129760 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $342,853.78 POWER 129769 80 CAL GAS CO L2.615.66 NATURAL GAS W 129770 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL LO 341,932.49 DIESEL FUEL i 129771 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO INC 313.730.51' INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129772 STAMEN Z SPASSOFF PL 32.Si O.uC ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-1 n 129773 SPEAKER SUPPORT 1381.94 PRESENTATION AIDS r 129774 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC 1509.73 PLUMBING SUPPLIES r 229775 SPEK INDUSTRIES INC il.i7d.9♦ LAB SUPPLIES t$ 129776 ETANCO•S VACUUM SERYCE $3,706.70 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES N L29771 STATE BOARD OF EOUALIIATION 129.12 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 129778 SUMMIT STEEL a179.&C METAL A 129779 SUNSET FORD 1329.81 TRUCK PARTS 129780 SUR-LITE CORPORATION 1:5.603.26 GAS FLARE REPAIRS C-) 129781 TAYLOR-DUNN MPG COMPANY 136C.61 ELECTRIC CART PARTS _-i 129762 TEKDRAULICS $7,429.80 PUMP PARTS _N 129T83 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC L23.SD OFFICE SUPPLIES 129784 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $253.45 MACHINE SUPPLIES 129785 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. $465.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129786 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL 1i.120.65 ELECTRIC PARTS 229707 TRANF 1017..3 VALVES 129788 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES 32.390.Uu TRAVEL SERVICES 129789 TRUCK I. AUTO SUPPLY INC 11.890.49 TRUCK PARTS 129T90 URISA 190.D0 MEMBERSHIP DUES 129791 UVI . INC $66.15 LAB SUPPLIES 229792 UHLER. INC 1153.600.93 CONSTRUCTION 5-32, 5-33 129793 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 351.72 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129794 UNOCAL 5191.31 UNLEADED GASOLINE 129795 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 3411.02 PARCEL SERVICES ri m f 10 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL ( PROCESSING ERTApr 4/29/93 P46L T ' EGRE I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID C5/05/93 PUSTING DATE L5/45/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129796 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $415.UL UPS DEPOSIT 129797 US DEFT OF COMMERCE NTI $19.50 PUBLICATION 129798 VOC TESTING $2r500.00 AQMD TEST 129799 VWK SCIENTIFIC $S022.33 LAB SUPPLIES 129800 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $148.43 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129861 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $3r159.04 LAB SUPPLIES 129802 VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC $6,889.37 LAB SUPPLIES 129803 VILLAGC NURSERIES a10E.11 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 129804 WESTERN FEDERAL INC 1243.25 LAB SUPPLIES rD 129805 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 116,333.35 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 129806 JOHN WILEY 8 SONS INC $187.76 BOOK m 129907 WILLOAN ASSOCIATES $2.489.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-31 Z 129808 IEKOI CORP $17,171.30 COPIER LEASES C 129809 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $1.146.u4 LAB SUPPLIES n 229810 ZURN INDUSTRIES 51.538.9b ELECTRIC PARTS ----------------- Ell TOTAL CLAIMS FAIU 05105/93 a3h Blsbu9J3 00 SUMMARY AMOUNT I 01 OPEN FUND 9,009.70 n 82 OPER FUND 25,323.06 r 82 CAP FAC FUND 12,083.94 T— 03 OPER FUND 52,146.22 C7 R3 CAP FAC FUND 509.95 K5 0PER FUND 4,851.47 N 05 CAP FAC FUND 59,841.59 46 OPER FUND 6,438.92 07 OPEN FUND 11,057.78 � 47 CAP FAC FUND 375.84 -4 011 OPER FUND 12,269.37 013 OPEN FUND 102.28 014 OPEN FUND 601.64 0566 OPER FUND 2,793.59 0566 CAP FAC FUND 148,544.55 4G67 OPER FUND 32.83 87614 OPER FUND 15.26 JT OPER FUND 925,761.41 CORE 2,144,997.41 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FU 4,856.44 JT DIST FORKING CAPITAL 166,996.29 ___________________ 3,587,609.53 ]a FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINb DATE 5/13/9S PAGE 1 Gy REPORT NUMBER AP45 I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY N-- CLAIMS FAIR C5/i9/93 POSTING DAIL 45/0/93 ` WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT ULSLRIPTION 129637 AS TECH COMPANY 557.431.95 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 129838 A 7 9 T $4.540.78 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 129839 A 3 6 DRILLING INC. 51.407.66 CONCRETE SERVICES 129R40 ACCESSORIE AIR COMPRESSOR S 32C8.56 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 229841 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC f190.C4 I" SERVICES 129842 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES 5973.24 LAB SUPPLIES 129843 AIR FRODUCTS A CHEMICAL IN S39.b69.66 CAN AGREEMENT CRY. GEN SYST M.O.B-9-89 129844 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD f22r124.63 MANHOLE COVERS 129845 ALLIED SUPPLY CO f6.68 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129846 AMERSNAM CORP 1224.34 LAB SUPPLIES n 329847 AMRESCO. INC $197.4, LAS SUPPLIES n' 129848 ANUATACO $812.96 LAB SUPPLIES Z 129849 ANTHONY PEST CON7ROL f90.4U SERVICE AGREEMENT Y 129850 ANTNONY-S MECH 6 MACHINE, INC. 3316.95 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 129851 A-PLUS SYSTEMS S9C6.Y5 NOTICES 6 ADS 129852 APPLIED R10SYSTENS INC S147,288.13 LAB SUPPLIES --I 129853 ABC LABORATORIES 31.175.Ou LAB SERVICES 3 129R54 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 5603.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 329855 ASBURY LUVIRONMLh7AL SERV, 4780.06 WASTE OIL REMOVAL # 129656 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD 1 S039.54 CONCRETE SERVICES OO 129657 RANDOLFH AUS71N CO - 3659.10 LAB SUPPLIES 129858 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 33.1T6.75 PAYROLL SERVICES 129859 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 346.55 TRUCK PARTS .]0 129860 8KK LANDFILL 32.T0B.43 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 f"• 229061 BRW SAFETY 3 SUFI'LY 32.624.96 SAFETY SUPPLIES r 129862 BACHARACH INC $14C.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129863 BANANA BLUEPRINT 511.918.tl8 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES 129864 8ARCLAYS LAW PUNLISHLRS UG.99 FREIGHT N 129865 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 511.276.25 LAB SUPPLIES - 1 129866 bLLLCO GLASS. INC. 13.923.8E LAB SUPPLIES 129867 HENZ ENGINEERING INC 12.0 19.5E COMPRESSOR PARTS f'0 129868 DIOMERILUS VITEK INC f039.89 LAB SUPPLIES 129869 PIOSAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. 681.55 LAB SUPPLIES N 129070 810 TECH NCI. INC 273.76 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129871 bISHUP COMPANY Sb2b.99 TOOLS 129872 BOEHRIh6F.R HANNHEIM 3912 dD LAB SUPPLIES 129873 BOISE CASCADE DFC PRODUCTS $1,101.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129874 BOh-A-RULS 5719.31 TRUCK PARTS 129875 BORLAND INTERNATIONAL 579.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 129076 BOYLE ENbINEFRJNU CORP $2.881.17 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-19 229877 URINUERSOh CURF 321.181.UO PLUMBING SERVICES 129878 NUGGET JANITORIAL f'.a50.6a JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129879 BUILDER'S EMPORIUM S1GO.SV HARDWARE 129880 LANY 6 STREED S9.U2b.57 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 129001 C M 1 $4.148.38 INSTRUMENT 129882 CRC PRESS INC f85.00 PUBLICATIONS G1 I F/ 10 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE Pq 5113193 PAGE 21:0 ( ^ IV REPORT\` COUNTY SANITATIONN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 65/19/93 P4611N6 DATE Ob/19193 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT UESCRIPTION 1298P3 CS COMPANY $7,495.87 VALVES 129604 CALTROL INC 51.761.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129005 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC $549.13 TRUCK REPAIRS L29086 CALIF. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTNULS 53.09.11 FITTINGS 129807 CALIFORNIA GLASS E MEIAL 5140.VO DOOR REPAIRS 1298b8 CALIFORNIA SUPRESSION SYSTEM 349b.45 CABLE 129PP9 CALK CAMERAS AND VIULO $44.7h CAMERA REPAIRS 229890 CAPITAL WESTWARD 42.822.7b GAUGE 129891 CENTREPUINT COMMERCIAL 1N7 $1,777.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129692 CENTURY SAFETY INST A SUPP $510.74 SAFETY SUPPLIES .n 129893 CETAC TECHNOLOGIES INC 344.b5 PUMP FFI 129P94 CHROME CRANKSHAFT INC 3555.60 MECHANICAL REPAIRS m 129895 CIRCUIT INDUSTRIES Sb31.86 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT n 129896 CITY WIRE CLOTH INC 514.21 FREIGHT 129h97 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $501.87 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129898 COASTAL CHLORINATION 6240.06' WATER SYSTEM CHLORINATION m 129099 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO 52.004.91 LAB EQUIPMENT 3 1299UO COMPUSA. INC. 33.750.V5 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 129901 COMPUSEPVE 594.37 COMPUTER SERVICES # 129902 CONNELL GM FARTS / DIV 574.48 TRUCK PARTS 00 1299C3 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3.755.02 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES .1 1299C. CONSOLIDATED FREIbHTWAYS 41,170.25 FREIGHT 129905 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $191.74 TOOLS ]a 1299C6 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C 32.349.88 SOILS REPORT f- 129907 CONVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL WEST 4530.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND 329908 COOPLR INDUSTRIES INC 1156.4G ELECTRIC PARTS tp 129909 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY S18V.92 TRUCK PARTS 129910 COSTAP CURP $101.29 LAB SUPPLIES C6 129911 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 3182.59 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 129912 CRANL VEYOR CORM $138.32 PIPE �. 129913 DAILY PILOT 3105.60 NOTICES 6 ADS (� 129914 DAPPER TIRE $437.17 TIRES N 129915 OE AN2A CORPOhAYION 3150.WW EQUIPMENT RENTALS 129916 DELTA TECH SERVICE INC $17,566.25 FILTER TEST SERVICES 129917 DEZURIK AND/OR IS CO 3763.24 VALVE PARTS 129910 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 31.927.5K ANIONIC POLYMER M.O. 8-12-92 129919 DICKSONS 4659.85 APPLIANCES 129920 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT COOP $306.60 TRAINING REGISTRATION 129921 DISFOSAL CONTRUL SERVICE IN 51.316.89 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 129922 DORADO ENTERPRISES 111C $16.764.0G' PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 129923 DRESSER MEASUREMENT S1S9.05 FREIGHT 129924 POBENT F DRIVER ASSOC 370..06 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 129925 DUNN EDWARDS COPP 31.640.4U PAINT SUPPLIES 129926 ESP NORTH 31.4B4.G7 HARDWARE 129927 LASTMAN INC 54.560.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129928 ELECT AIR TOOL CO 5132.74 CONVEYOR PARTS 2 L"G 1 N 2 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST MORNING CAPI7AL PROCESSING DATE 5113/93 PAGE 3 HO REPORT NUMBER AP44 I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY W CLAIMS PAID 65/19/93 POSTING DATE Lb/19/93 ` WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129929 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES ♦4.346.00 ELECTRICAL CONSULTING 129930 ENCHANTER INC 14.480.1I OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 129931 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSUC 3766.54 LAB SERVICES 129932 FBI SAND AND 6kAVLL INC a265.3. ROAD BASE 329933 MARSHALL FAIRRES 3A28.L8 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129934 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 34.660.oL RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.10-9-91 129935 FEDERAL EMPRESS COkF $852.49 AIR FREIGHT 12993E FERRELL4AS $122.58 PROPANE 129937 FILTERLINE CORP 1448.7J CHLORINATION PARTS a 129938 FILTER SUPPLY CO SE.496.2c MECHANICAL PARTS 129939 FISCHER 8 PORTER CO $556.31 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES ITT 229940 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. 1225.4E CONCRETE CUTTING ME 129941 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA S1[2.76 FILM D 129942 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 31.865.00 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS FEE 229943 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $691.44 PAINT SUPPLIES 129944 THE FOMBORD CO $2.360.9b INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES —I 129945 GET. INC. $13,300.93 INSTRUMENT PARTS 3 129946 6ANAHL LUMBER CU 3717.9[ LUMBER 129947 GENERAL TELEPHONE CU 14.354.L4 TELEPHONE SERVICES # 229948 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC SL7.017.11 PUMP PARTS 00 129949 GILSON MEDICAL ELECTRONICS $132.94 LAB SUPPLIES 129950 N GLANTZ a SON $624.11 SIGN SUPPLIES 129951 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC 5198.O0 SUBSCRIPTION 129952 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 13b2.4: FILM r 129953 DON GREEN L ASSUCIATLS 3975.L'L' SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 r 129954 MACH COMPANY 5151.35 BOILER PARTS C 129955 FRED A HARPER $1,500.56 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129956 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS 31.890.06 CONTAINER RENTALS CA 229957 FL HAWN CO INC 37,171.99 AIR FILTERS 129950 HELLO 3b1.77 TELEPHONE SUPPLIES 129959 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES S1.632.00 TEMPORARY SERVICES f") 129960 POKE CONTROLS DIV/HOME. INC. $44i.28 VALVES —{ 129961 PS HUGHES CO INC $1,924.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES _ Cn 129962 HUNTER CORPORATION 3164.866.3E CONSTRUCTION J-19-3 129963 HUNTIN670N BEACH RUBBER STA Sb46.5. OFFICE SUPPLIES :29964 HUNTING70N SUPPLY 1436.b2 HARDWARE _ 129965 HUNTIA,TON VALLEY SCHWINA C 332.3C BICYCLE PARTS 129966 HUNTS FINAL PHASE $3,420.06 DOOR INSTALLATION 129967 ISC 11.248.G: INSTRUMENT SERVICES 129968 IMPERIAL WEST CHLVICAL $72,668.26 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 129969 INDUSTRIAL THREAOEU PRODUCTS SE.L73.UL CONNECTORS 129976 INGRAM PAPER 33b7.97 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES _ 129971 INSTITUTE FOR SCIENTIFIC INFU $441.74 LAB SUPPLIES 129972 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,506.75 BATTERIES 229973 JLA CREDIT CORP $145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 129974 JAV-S CATERING $503.26 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE lb 2 fi 10 9199 - JT DIST HORNING CAPITAL ` PROCESSING DATE 5/13/9.7 FALL 4 REP OAT NUMBER AP43 11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANbE COUNTY . 3a CLAIM* PAID C5/19/93 POSTING DAIL U3/19/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129975 JIM.S SUSPENSION SLRVICL 150.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 129976 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1.433.93 ELECTRIC PARTS 129917 JONES CHEMICALS INC 52.039.14 CHEMICALS 199978 THE KEITH COMFANIES $14.900.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35 129979 KING NEARING INC 3190.L. MACHINE SUPPLIES 129980 THE KNOX COMPANY $278.05 SECURITY SYSTEM PARTS 129981 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUFPLILS $2,759.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129902 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO 450.9. CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 129983 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY GO 4415.97 PUMP PARTS . Y 199984 - LEGI-TECH 1320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 129985 LEE C NO CONSULTING EMIR 122r366.1. ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-36-5 al F11 129986 LORAIN PRODUCTS 11.231.34 SERVICE AGREEMENT .Z 129987 MFS $357.11 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES a 129988 NO$ INSPECTION INC 5262.25 TESTING SERVICES 129989 MACOMCO 5837.44 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 129990 MANLEYvS BOILER RLPAIR CG9 INC 11.923.64 BOILER REPAIRS —I 129992 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $412.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 3 129992 MATT - CHLOR INC $531.53 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 129993 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO $259.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES # 129994 MES COMPANY S2C030.55 BELT PRESS REPAIRS CIO 129995 MIDLAND MFG CORP $726.38 CHLORINATION PARTS 129996 MIDWAY MFG C MACHINING $2.371.13 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 1 129991 MISSION ABRASIVE SOFPLIES $246.49 HARDWARE y 129998 MISSION INDUSTRIES 13,070.55 UNIFORM RENTALS 1— 129999 MLAUEN SUNTICM CONSTRUCTION *105.590.03 CONSTRUCTION 2-30 1— 130000 TOM MOORE $8,655.0, CONSULTING SERVICES P2-44 C 130001 MORTON SALT AND/OR 5465.b1 SALT 130D02 NASCO VEST INC S:98.23 LAB SUPPLIES Cn 130003 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 2100.75 SAFETY FILM RENTALS --4 130004 NEV HERMES INC 1309.68 HARDWARE A 136005 NEI HUNIIONS COMPUTER CLNTL 51.140.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION f"1 130CG6 NORTHWESTERN CARBON S.r250.34 CHEMICALS .� 130007 01 CORPORATION $204.73 LAB SUPPLIES CN 130000 OX SYSTEMS CO 129.340.4.9 CHLORINE M.O.30-9-91 130069 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY C $808.13 CHEMICALS 130020 ORANGE VALVL 1 FITTING CO. 1739.29 FITTINGS 130011 OXYGEN SERVICE 464.65 SPECIALTY GASES 130022 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S/2.SON.12 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT 13C013 PACIFIC PARTS $14,732.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 136014 PACIFIC SAFETY LQUIPMENT CO Sir335.16 SAFETY SUPPLIES 130025 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C 168.44 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 130016 FACTEL MLRIUTAN SYSTEMS 5155.7: TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 23001T PAINE JANITORIAL SUPF 1..521.95 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 130010 FAGENET $99.5. PAGER RENTALS 13C019 FAK HEST 5130.97 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 130020 PALMIENI. TYLER9 WIENER. 3:.156.3L LEGAL SERVICES 14-1-1A GG FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/13/93 FAbL 5 trj HLFORT. NUMBAR AP83 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY l.n CLAIMS LAID 1.5/19/93 POSTING DATE U5/19/93 WARRANT NO. VLND06 AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 130021 P.F. PAULUS, INC S24.172.2C UTILITY LOCATION SERVICES 130022 ROY PENOENGPAFT s.b C.Jt DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 13CO23 PERFORMANCE ANALYTICAL S2.u63.L4 AIR ANALYSIS 130024 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION i1.999.R9 LAB SUPPLIES 130025 FEROMIDATION SYSTEMS INC s4..510.b7 CHEMICALS 13CO26 PIMA ORO SYSTEMS INC sa3.352.3L RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 ,. 130027 POLYPURE INC 124.187.89 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 130028 POLYSPEDE s919.03 ELECTRIC PARTS 130029 POWER PUMPS INC $571.34 PUMP PARTS 130036 PRINCETON SEPARATIONS 196.5u LAB SUPPLIES ]a 130031 PRDCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY $959.39 PUMP PARTS 'n 130032 Pk OFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. So./BL.LS SOIL TESTING z 230033 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. _ Se.9.0.GJ INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 C7 130G30 PULSAFEEDER S97b.93 PUMP PARTS n 130035 QUALITY BUILDING SUFPLY 193.72 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 130036 RGF ENTERPRISES Si43.21 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT .--� 130037 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO S1.569.41 TRASH REMOVAL FTI 130038 RAACO INC 166.736.42 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 3 230039 RED VALVE CO INC 6918.5L VALVES # 230040 MCJUT.MIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY S..eo6.9_ PLUMBING SUPPLIES OO 230041 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CORP 1831.15 LAB SUPPLIES 130042 RESTEM CORP 172.97 LAB SUPPLIES 1 130043 RICH COLOR LAB SBD.bI PRINTING n 130004 ROB02 SURGICAL INSTRUMENT C 1126.Ou LAB SUPPLIES r 130M5 ROSEMOUNT INC. sb2417C INSTRUMENT I-" 230006 DON R. ROTH $213.8. DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF C 136007 ARNOLD S RUMMELSBURG. C.E. 12.803.bb ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.1-20-93 130008 JUSEPH T PYEPS ON G SOM 1N S63e.29 METAL N 130099 S.S. MECHANICAL SB.150.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES -i 130656 SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA 919U.s. SAFETY SUPPLIES I3DC51 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 32.620.9b PLUMBING SUPPLIES C7 136G52 SANTA LANK 1T0.637.5C CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30 130053 DOUG SARVIS S975.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING N 136054 SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS 4.12.21 LAB SUPPLIES 13CO55 SHAMROCK SUPPLY .658.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 13G056 SHURELUCM SALES 37.670.i9 HARDWARE 130057 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $27.543.37 POWER 130CSO SO CAL GAS CO S13.593.25 NATURAL GAS 130059 SOUTKERH COUNTIES OIL CU S.4.630.79 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 130060 SFARMLETTS DRINKING WATER S..483.89 WATER/COOLER RENTALS 136061 STAMEN 2 SPASSUFF FL 15.04O.U.' ENGINEERING SERVICES H.0.3-11-92 13DO62 WESTALLUV INC S215..0 WELDING SUPPLIES 130063 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC 1275.63 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 130064 SPEC TECH INC >IB3.21 WELDING SUPPLIES 130065 SPEA INDUSTRIES INC S713.b6 LAB SUPPLIES 13UG66 STARE INDUSTRIAL FROGS. 1872.18 PLUMBING PARTS bul J ``/ 10 9199 - JT GIST VORKINb CAPITAL FROCESSING DATE 3/13/9S FASL 6 m PLPUNT NUMBER AP43 cn 1 LOURTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAN6L CGUNIT 2 CLAIMS PAID 45J19193 POSIINb DATE C5/19/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMJUNT DESCRIPTION 232067 STEMMERS TREE SERVICL /11.200.00 TREE REMOVAL 6 TRIMMING 130068 STERLING ART 57.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 13DO69 SUMMIT STEEL $665.24 STEEL 130070 SUPELCO INC SB05.92 LAB SUPPLIES 130071 SYMANTEC CORP $28.97 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 13G072 TEKORAULICS 5312.23 PUMP PARTS 130073 CHARLES E THOMAS S12C.46 TRUCE PARTS 136074 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1498.47 MACHINE SUPPLIES 130175 TONT.S LOCK 6 SAFE SERVICL $427.95 SECURITY SERVICES y 130076 TOWNE CREATIVE SERVICES 5540.44 PRINTING m 130077 TRANE $528.01 VALUES ITT 130078 TRAVEL EAECUIIVLS 5118.O'v TRAVEL SERVICES ME 230079 TREBOR ELECTROBICS 6633.3E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES y 13C0BC TRUCK S AUTO SUPPLY INC 1915.65 TRUCK PARTS 130081 TRUESDAIL LABS 62.6CG.6O LAB SERVICES y 130062 J6 TUCKER C SON INC 5649.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS m 130083 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $9b.66 LAB SUPPLIES 13CO84 UNOCAL 6174.92 UNLEADED GASOLINE 130085 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5201.12 PARCEL SERVICES 130086 UNIVERSITY OF MAVAII 512.071.67 WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE 00 13GO87 1WR SCIENTIFIC $1,170.45 LAB SUPPLIES ,.1 136088 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $3.959.54 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 130089 VAN WATER S R04ENS $700.58 CHEMICALS 3- 13OC90 VARIAN ANALYTICAL 1NSTRUNEhTS 51.659.27 LAB SUPPLIES 1- 130092 VERNE-S PLUMBING 5135.06 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 134092 WALKER RICHER 6 BUINN INC 37,356.55 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 10 136093 VEBB ENGINEERING S802.30 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS N 135094 VEST COAST ANALYTICAL SAW $510.00 LAB SUPPLIES 13Q095 WEST COAST TLRAINALS INC SlBv.6i OFFICE REPAIRS y 130096 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS IN $371.74 TRUCK PARTS 130C97 WESTERN STATES CNLMICAL SBPFLY 126.351.34 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92 130098 ROURKE S WOODRUFF L SPRADLIN /40.138.92 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 N 130099 AEROA CORF 95.809.39 COPIER LEASES ,. 130100 RICNARU 8 E0GAR 5200.Ov DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION -----------'----- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID LS/19/93 61.532.31U.IU s to _C a FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/13/93 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 V COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 05/19/93 POSTING DATE 05/19/93 SUMMARY AMOUNT 41 OPER FUND $500.00 - 42 OPEN FUND $12,067.78 42 CAP PAC FUND $146 166.82 43 OPER FWD $23:195.69 43 CAP PAC FUND $2,838.46 45 OPEN FUND 5594.50 45 CAP FAC FWD $10,900.19 46 OPER FUND $26.34 47 OPER FUND $5,606.42 47 CAP PAC FUND 62,913.75 3. 411 OPER FUND $15,988.41 G) 411 CAP FAC FUND $119.40 414 CAP FAC FUND $1,762.35 m 4586 OPEN FUND $52.70 n 4566 CAP FAC FUND $128.68 4687 OPER FUND $2,702 18 07614 OPER FUND $7,082:40 JT OPER FUND b606 246.31 fTl CORF b:522:443.60 3 eELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $12 508 12 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUN➢ $158:466:00 ---------_____ 41,532,310.10 00 r r e7 z tz COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS May 19, 1993 a ORANGE COUPM. CAUFORNIA 1p EWSnV E MEMORANDUM PO 81V E411"fy"vaur.cauwwaa Enza•a�n �.� TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager FROM: Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager SUBJECT: ONE NEW SELF-PROPELLED AERIAL WORK PLATFORM, SPECIFICATION NO. E-231 Sealed bids were Opened Tuesday, May 18, 1993, for the Purchase of One Self-Propelled Aerial Work Platform, Specification No. E-231. Tabulation of bids is as follows: DEALER TOTAL PRICE Western Pacific Equipment Company 581,795.O0 Santa Fe Springs, CA American HI-Lift 588,663.00 City of Industry, CA Mac HI-Reach $89,446.00 La Mirada, CA Horizon High Reach $74,330.00 ' Fullerton, CA The bid received from Horizon High Reath Company was rejected because It did not meet the minimum height and platform load capacity requirements. It is recommended the award be made to Western Pacific Equipment Company,the lowest responsible bidder,for their proposed amount of$81,795.00,plus sales tax. Sufficient funds have been budgeted for this purchase. Respectfully /submitted, Ted Hoffman ' Purchasing Manager We hereby concur with the above recommendation: Zry G. Stre Edwin E. Hodges hector of r4nance Assistant Director of Maintenance "C" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C" WUNI1 OANIIAIIUN UIJINIW6 May 11, 1993 01 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 11:00 a.m. IOW ELLIS AVENUE Two Addenda A.Box Si 27 FOUNTAINVALLEY,CALIFOMIA82728-8127 B I D TABULATION 171g882-2A11 �a..� Specification No. M-044 PROJECT TITLE: Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Relocate existing trailers to new locations at both Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Provide Parking for emolovees and District vehicles for Construction Management Personnel and create a new Construction Management complex. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $150,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT: $148.000.00 _______________aeveaeeeveeeaesevaveveeeveee TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID 1. Park Rose Construction, Inc. , Long Beach, CA $199,200 2. Colich & Sons Environmental , Gardena, CA $320,000 3. Schuler Engineering Corp., Riverside, CA $376,978 4. Ryco Construction, Inc. , Gardena, CA $393,700 5. Dorado Enterprises, Inc., Fountain Valley, CA $405,497 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. 1, therefore, recommend award to Park Rose Construction, Inc. in the bid amount of $199,j00.00/as the lowest and best bid. (Fhomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" RESOLUTION NO. 93-58 AWARDING SPECIFICATION NO. M-044 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR OFFICE TRAILER RELOCATIONS AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2, SPECIFICATION NO. M-044 x::xxxxaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which is a portion of the previously-approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval. �..✓ In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Park Rose Construction, Inc. for Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" Section 3. That the contract for Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, be awarded to Park Rose Construction, Inc. , in the total amount of $199,200.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. rc3ej.058 "D-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3" Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-Two (221 CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: June 9. 1993 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 . JOB NO. J-19-1 CONSULTANT: BROWN AND CALDWELL ENGINEERS Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Becher) $ 8,251 .00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEM EXHAUST SAMPLE PORTS This item is for providing two additional 4-inch diameter sample ports on each engine exhaust stack in new locations as required by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. This item was accomplished by contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO J191-035) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 7,389.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - ELEVATOR MECHANICAL ROOM PARTITION This item is for providing an eight-foot high, 1-3/4-inch mesh galvanized chain link fence in the elevator mechanical room. The partition is required to prevent access through the elevator mechanical room as required by the State of California Elevator Safety Orders. This item was negotiated with the contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO J191-037) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 862.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 8,251 .00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-Two (22) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: June 9, 1993 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1 CONSULTANT: BROWN AND CALDWELL ENGINEERS The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 21 , 1991 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date October 12, 1992 Time Extension this Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 335 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 935 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date September 12, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 15,410,855.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1 ,447,454.00 This Change (Add) (Deduet) $ 8,251 00 Amended Contract Price $ 16,866,560 00 "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-Two (22) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: June 9. 1993 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO 1 JOB NO, J-19-1 CONSULTANT: BROWN AND CALDWELL ENGINEERS Board Authorization Date: June 9, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: ngineering Manager bnstruction Manager Date APP BY �/ APPROVED AS TO FORM: erector of Engineering Date General Counsel Date HUNTER CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: (g6, a& 510- 3 ontractor Date J-19-1\M.72 "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(9) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT§ W ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA May 21, 1993 10WEu1SAVME P0_WX8127 11:00 a.m. wurrtaN vs V.q"EasraA ssr. mn98bNn BID TABULATION Job No. J-32 PROJECT TITLE: Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Relocation and conversion of two trailers into final effluent samolino facility and a bioassay research facility ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $210.000 BUDGET AMOUNT: $190.000 TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID 1. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, Ontario, CA $202,579.00 2. Margate Construction, Inc., Carson, CA $264,900.00 3. Park Rose Construction, Inc., Long Beach, CA $270,000.00 4. Colich & Sons Environmental, Gardena, CA $275,000.00 I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers in the bid amount of $202,579.00 as the lowest and best bid. Thomas Mawes Director of Engineering "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" RESOLUTION NO. 93-59 AWARDING JOB NO. J-32 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR FINAL EFFLUENT SAMPLER SYSTEM AND BIOASSAY RESEARCH FACILITY AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-32 x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. In accordance with the Districts, Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Boards of Directors, on June 9, 1993, authorized filing a Notice of Exemption in connection with the proposed project for Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-32; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-32, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-32, be awarded to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers in the total amount of $202,579.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and secretary •of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. rcaw.059 �d "F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 21 ORANGE COUNIY. CALIFORNIA May 18, 1993 fe EWE AVENUE 11:00 a.m. 2O WX 8122 m WN V4 Y.MIMAMA 92M2 127 91..9E2RA11 BID TABULATION Jobs Nos. P1-42 and P2.49 PROJECT TITLE: Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1. Job No. P1.42. and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-49. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Thirteen nroiects, including sidewalk. oavina. seismic brecino and electrical work. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $260.ODO BUDGET AMOUNT: $350.000 TOTXU- CONTRACTOR BID 1. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, Ontario, CA $235,900.00 2. Dorado Enterprises, Inc., Fountain Valley, CA $279,591.00 3. Colich & Sons Environmental, Gardena, CA $350,000.00 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Pascal & Ludwig E ineers in the bid amount of $235,900.00 as the lowest and best bid. Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" RESOLUTION NO. 93-60 AWARDING JOB NOS. P1-42 AND P2-49 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-42, AND MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. In accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Boards of Directors hereby authorize filing a Notice of Exemption in connection with the proposed project for �►� Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49; and, Section 2 . That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, be awarded to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers in the total amount of $235, 900. 00 in accordance with "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. rc3bj .060 "G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 1OB44 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ( J ��hcrcW (714)962-2411 �Wf� May 26, 1993 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 9 to Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engneers for Professional Engineering Services in Connection with Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for Addendum No. 9 to the Professional Services Agreement for professional engineering services in connection with Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for a reallocation of funds, on an hourly-rate basis, including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $4,471,136.00. Existing Change per Amended Aareement Addn. No. 9 Aareement Engineering Services, (direct labor at hourly rates, plus overhead at 175%), not to exceed $3,488,820 $ (36,503) $3,452,327 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 418,777 36,503 455,280 Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 162,700 0 162,700 Fixed Profit 400,839 _ 0 400,839 TOTAL AMENDED CONTRACT, not to exceed 44.471.136 00 44.471.136 "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Boards of Directors 1e241 ELLIE AVENUE May 26, 1993 Ro.Rexe127 / Page Two FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAUFORNIA 8272a.8127 014)BU4411 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/William Mahoney Is/Evelyn Hart William Mahoney Evelyn Hatt Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/A. B. Catlin /s/Don R. Griffin A. B. Catlin Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Past Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee �►� /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) (D .- ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-61 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 9 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR OF JOB NO. J-19 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 9 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS, JOB NO. J-19, PROVIDING FOR A REALLOCATION OF COSTS AMONG CATEGORIES WITHIN SAID AGREEMENT x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for preliminary design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19 (subsequently divided into Job Nos. J-19-1 and J-19-2) ; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for additional services necessary relative to application and processing of a Permit to Construct from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) ; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for additional services required for background NOx and health risk assessment modeling information required by SCAQMD; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to said agreement provided for phased final design of said project; Phase I work to commence immediately for electrical system configuration studies, digester "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" gas system modifications and ongoing South coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) permitting interface, and Phase II work for final design, construction and training services to commence upon receipt of a permit to construct from SCAQMD; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 4 to said agreement provided for design of a steam turbine system to be incorporated into the project to take advantage of engine heat to produce additional electricity; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 5 to said agreement provided for design of digester hot water loop replacement for the system's heat removal at both plants; design modifications to gas system at Digesters A and B; and design of backup cooling water source for the new Ocean Outfall Booster Station at Plant No. 2; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 6 to said agreement provided for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 7 to said agreement provided for additional construction support services; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 8 to said agreement provided for additional inspection and design services; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said agreement to provide for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the total maximum authorized compensation; and, "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(j ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" WHEREAS, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 9 dated June 9, 1993, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated July 9, 1986, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers, for design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for a reallocation of costs among the categories within said agreement, with no change in the total maximum authorized compensation, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said reallocation of costs shall be as follows and shall not change the maximum authorized compensation of $4,471,136.00: �aV "I-3" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-3" Existina Agreement Addendum Amended As Amended No. 9 Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 175%, not to exceed $3,488,820.00 (936,503.00) $3,452,327.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 418,777.00 36,503.00 455,280.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 162,700.00 0.00 162,700.00 Fixed Profit 400,839.00 QM 400,839.00 TOTAL, not to exceed 94.471.136.00 9�.0� 94,471,136.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 9 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. R6D/J.g61 "I-4" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA F.O.BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 l / (714)962-2411 May 26, 1993 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 2 to Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Professional Engineering Services in Connection with Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with John Carollo Engineers for Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement for Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 1, Job No. P2-42, providing for modifications and changes to enhance the treatment process, on an hourly-rate basis, including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $5,481,753.00. Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addn. No. 2 Agreement Engineering Services, (direct labor at hourly rates, plus overhead at 155%), not to exceed $4,474,262 $ 0 $4,474,262 Engineering Services, (direct labor at hourly rates, plus overhead at 166%). not to exceed 0 292,000 292,000 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 180,000 0 180,000 Fixed Profit 523,811 11,680 535,491 TOTAL AMENDED CONTRACT, not to exceed 55.178.073 ,$Q 55.481.753 "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS If ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Boards of Directors 10004 EWS AVENUE May 26, 1993 RO.BOX9121 Page Two FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272Mi02 \'J 17141882-2411 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/William Mahoney /s/Evelyn Hart William Mahoney Evelyn Hart Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/A. B. Catlin Is/Don R. Griffin A. B. Catlin Don R. Grffin Past Joint Chairman Past Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /slrhomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee �.J 'rJ-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "J-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-62 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN OF JOB NOS. P1-36 AND P2-42 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, PREPARATION OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS, AND TRAINING SERVICES RE SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-36, AND SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-42, PROVIDING FOR MODIFICATIONS AND CHANGES TO ENHANCE THE TREATMENT PROCESS AND PROVIDE OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY AND RELIABILITY FOR NPDES PERMIT COMPLIANCE WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design and construction services, preparation of operations and maintenance manuals, and training services re Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42 ; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for revisions to the errors and omissions insurance requirements; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said agreement to provide for modifications and changes to enhance the treatment process and provide operational flexibility and reliability for NPDES permit compliance; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on April 14 , 1993 , the Selection Committee has "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1" negotiated and certified a fee for said additional services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 2 dated June 9, 1993, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated October 11, 1989, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and John Carollo Engineers for design and construction services, preparation of operations and maintenance manuals, and training services re Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, providing for modifications and changes to enhance the treatment process and provide operational flexibility and reliability for NPDES permit compliance, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $327,000.00, as follows, which increases the total authorized compensation from $5,178,073.00 to an amount not to exceed $5,505, 073.00: "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2" Existina Agreement Addendum Amended As Amended No. 2 Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 155%, not to exceed $4,474,262.00 $4,474,262.00 Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 166%, not to exceed $292,000.00 292,000.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 180,000.00 0.00 180,000.00 Fixed Profit 523,811.00 11,680.00 535,491.00 TOTAL, not to exceed 55.178.073.00 5303.680.00 55.481.753.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 2 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. awtiaa2 "K-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(k) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-3" RESOLUTION NO. 93-63 APPROVING FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT FOR UTILIZATION OF RECLAIMED WASTEWATER WITH OCWD A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT FOR ❑TILIZATION OF RECLAIMED WASTEWATER WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT (OCWD) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts have heretofore adopted a policy encouraging and supporting reclamation of wastewater for recycling in Orange County; and, WHEREAS, in furtherance of said policy, the County Sanitation Districts and the Orange County Water District entered into an agreement, dated August 9, 1972, wherein the Sanitation Districts would provide up to 15 million gallons per day of secondary treated wastewater to the Water District for reclamation and recycling purposes; and, WHEREAS, the Water District has expanded its water reclamation and recycling capabilities requiring additional secondary treated wastewater and the Sanitation Districts are now able to utilize recycled water in lieu of potable water in certain wastewater treatment processes, thereby conserving valuable water resources; and, WHEREAS, the Sanitation Districts and Water District are desirous of amending the 1972 agreement to update it to reflect the current needs, terms and conditions of exchange of secondary treated wastewater and reclaimed wastewater between the "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(m) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-I" respective parties for recycling purposes ; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts, at their regular meeting on April 14, 1993, authorized negotiations for an agreement that would provide up to 50 million gallons per day of secondary treated effluent to the Water District for recycling purposes at no charge, with a provision to, at any time, reevaluate the valuation and pricing for said secondary effluent; and to provide for purchase of Green Acres Project (GAP) water for 20 years at the audited cost to operate and maintain the GAP facilities, or the lowest cost of any GAP customer, whichever is less. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the First Amended and Restated Agreement for Utilization of Reclaimed Wastewater with the Orange County Water District (OCWD) , dated , is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. RAO➢3..aSi "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(m) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" Page 1 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Two (2) DATE: June 9. 1993 CONTRACTOR: Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc. JOB: Memory Lane Interceptor. Contract No. 2-30 CONSULTANT: Boyle Engineering Corporation Amount of this Change Order IAdd) (Dedeat) $ 45,858.11 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES The Contractor encountered various underground utilities not shown on the contract drawings while excavating and placing the new 27-inch and 30-inch sewer line in the City of Orange. On Parker Street, the Contractor encountered an �..✓ undisclosed 2-inch gas line at Station 113+18 and an 8-inch water main at Station 120+28. At the intersection of Parker Street and La Veta Avenue, an AT&T telephone fiber-optic cable encased in concrete was encountered between Stations 116+54 and 117+00. On La Veta Avenue, another telephone conduit was encountered at Station 123+03. This work was performed on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)21b). (Reference Contractor's Notice of Changed Conditions C1C 628, C1C 637, C1C 638 and C1C 640) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 19,979.16 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - ADDITIONAL PAVING ON LA VETA AVENUE Prior to the beginning of this job, La Veta Avenue was surveyed and the pavement was found to be failed in many areas. Because of this pre-existing deteriorated condition of the roadway and portions of its curb and gutters between Stations 116+30 and 124+00, the Contractor was directed to remove and replace the failed structural sections. Contract documents require the Contractor to replace that paving over the trench zone plus 12 inches on either side. "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(o) - DISTRICTS 192 "M-1" Page 2 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Two (2) DATE: June 9. 1993 CONTRACTOR: Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc. JOB: Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30 CONSULTANT: Boyle Enaineering Corooration The Contractor performed this work on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2(b). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 25,878.95 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 10 Calendar Days ITEM 3 - REDUCTION IN RETENTION The amount of retained funds on the project will be reduced from ten percent (10%) of contract work performed to date to an amount equal to five percent (5%) of the total contract amount. The Districts' General Provisions require that ten percent (10%) of each progress payment be retained until final payment, or posting of approved securities as an alternative to retained funds. The work is essentially complete. This item was negotiated pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 45,858.11 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 20 Calendar Days "M-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(o) - DISTRICTS 192 "M-2" Page 3 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Two (2) DATE: June 9. 1993 CONTRACTOR: Mladen Suntich Construction Co.. Inc. JOB: Memory Lane Interceptor. Contract No, 2-30 CONSULTANT: Boyle Enaineering Corporation The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It Is therefore mutually agreed that 20 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approve by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date June 30, 1992 Original Contract Time 300 Calendar Days Original Completion Date April 25, 1993 Time Extension this Change Order 20 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 20 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 320 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion 320 Calendar Days Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date May 15, 1993 Original Contract Price $ 3,471 ,857.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 78,273.22 This Change (Add) (Bedded $ 45,858.11 Amended Contract Price $ 3,595,057.31 "M-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(0) - DISTRICTS 192 "M-3" Page 4 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 108" ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Two (2) DATE: June 9. 1993 CONTRACTOR: Mladen Buntich Construction Co.. Inc. JOB: Memory Lane Interceptor. Contract No. 2-30 CONSULTANT: Boyle Engineering Corooration Board Authorization Date: June 9, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: RECOMMENDED�BY: J�Z,,; "' /!vy,,,.�.-� S4d-93 !�f�D- h.. /-` S-f7-9) Engineering Manager Date Construction Manager Date APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: G w 7� 5-ly-23 dw�{ Director of Engineering Date Ge t ral Counsel Date MLADEN BUN71CH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. ACCEPTED BY: Contractor ate EMG%2-70NCO2.2 "M-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(o) - DISTRICTS 1&2 "M-4" RESOLUTION NO. 93-73-7 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO, 7-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ABANDONMENT OF THE NAVY WAY PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAIN, AND CONSTRUCTION OF REPLACEMENT GRAVITY SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-20 ********************************** WHEREAS, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Abandonment of the Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the District has concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed project and hereby determines that said project is categorically exempt from further CEQA requirements; and, Section 2. That Abandonment of Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) - DISTRICT 7 "N-1" amended; and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation, Districts' engineers' , for Abandonment of Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and, Section 5. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. RGD.073 "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(p) - DISTRICT 7 "N-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-64 APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO AGREEMENT WITH SAIC FOR OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR CSDOC 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL, SPECIFICATION NO, 5-032 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 10 TO AGREEMENT WITH SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (SAIC) FOR OCEAN MONITORING CONTRACT SERVICES FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 120-INCH OCEAN OUTFALL, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-032, EXTENDING CONTRACT FROM JULY 1, 1993 TO JUNE 30, 1994 WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 120-inch Ocean Outfall, �i Specification No. 5-032; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 1 provided for the acquisition of additional laboratory instrumentation and authorized additional laboratory work to perform analyses on ocean sediments for trace constituents to comply with additional requirements imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 provided for modifications to the Current Monitoring Program required by EPA; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 3 extended the contract from July 1, 1986, to June 30, 1987; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 4 extended the contract from July 1, 1987 to June 30, 1988; and, "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-1" WHEREAS, Amendment No. 5 extended the contract from July 1, 1 ' 1988 to June 30, 1989, and provided for program modifications for �•s� the contract period from July 1, 1987 through June 30, 1988 as well as the fourth year of said contract, July 1, 1988 through June 30, 1989; and provided for a reduction in fees to be negotiated for years one, two and three of said contract; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 6 extended the contract from July 1, 1989 to June 30, 1990; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 7 extended the contract from July 1, 1990 to June 30, 1991; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 8 extended the contract from July 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992; and, WHEREAS, Amendment No. 9 extended the contract from July 1, 1992 to June 30, 1993; and, WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend the agreement to extend the existing contract from July 1, 1993 to June 30, 1994; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the established procedures for selection of professional services, the Special Joint Works Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2" Section 1. That Amendment No. 10 dated July 1, 1993, to that certain agreement dated August 7, 1985, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for County Sanitation Districts of orange County 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. S-032, providing for extension of the existing contract from July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994 (Contract Period Nine) , is hereby approved and accepted; and, ' Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by $2,120,480.00 for the ninth year of said contract, increasing the total authorized compensation from $13,157,319.00 to $15,277,799.00; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District ..►i No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Amendment No. 10 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. RAMJIM4 "0-3" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-3" RESOLUTION NO. 93-66 APPROVING LETTER AGREEMENT WITH MERRILL LYNCH AND PAINEWEBBER FOR UNDERWRITING SERVICES FOR THE FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP (1993 SWAP) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LETTER AGREEMENT WITH MERRILL LYNCH AND PAINEWEBBER FOR UNDERWRITING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE DISTRICTS' FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP (1993 SWAP) t ttt+tttttt++ttt+++++ttttttttttttt WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, pursuant to financial needs and requirements described in its Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan adopted July 19 , 1989, have determined to issue long- term debt obligations/securities and enter into other financial transactions to obtain the necessary funds to complete the development of its needed capital facilities and to manage said funds in the Districts' best interests; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore considered several well qualified underwriting firms to serve as their underwriter, and Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber, jointly, were selected as Underwriter for the Districts' Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP) with the potential of saving the Districts between $1 and $4 million, subject to final approval by the Boards of Directors; and, "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (8) (a) - ALL DISTRICTS 11P-1" WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have heretofore directed �✓ the Fiscal Policy Committee and other finance team members to proceed with planning and implementation of the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP) . NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the firm of Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber, jointly, is hereby appointed and designated as Underwriter for the forthcoming Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP) ; and, Section 2: That the terms and conditions of that certain Letter Agreement from Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber, dated May 13, 1993, are hereby approved; and, Section 3: That payment for said underwriting services, whereby Merrill Lynch will receive an amount not to exceed 10 basis points, and will pay to PaineWebber the lesser of the present value of five basis points or one-half of the total spread per annum from the net spread, is hereby authorized, subject to final approval by the Boards of Directors to proceed with said transaction; and, Section 4: That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Letter Agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. MaI7.066 "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (8) (a) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-67 APPROVING LETTER AGREEMENT WITH ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE TO SERVE AS THE DISTRICTS' CO-BOND COUNSEL FOR THE FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP (1993 SWAP) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LETTER AGREEMENT WITH ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE TO SERVE AS CO-BOND COUNSEL FOR THE DISTRICTS' FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP (1993 SWAP) WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, pursuant to financial needs and requirements described in its Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan adopted July 19, 1989, have determined to issue long- term debt obligations/securities and enter into other financial �r transactions to obtain the necessary funds to complete the development of its needed capital facilities and to manage said funds in the Districts' best interests; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore considered several well qualified legal firms to serve as their Bond Counsel, and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe was selected as co-Bond Counsel, along with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, for the Districts' Fixed- to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP) ; and, "�-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (8) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-1" WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have heretofore directed the Fiscal Policy Committee and other finance team members to proceed with planning and implementation of the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP) with the potential of saving the Districts between $1 and $4 million, subject to final approval by the Boards of Directors. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe is hereby appointed and designated as co-Bond Counsel for the forthcoming Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP) ; and, Section 2: That the terms and conditions of that certain Letter Agreement from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, dated May 12, 1993, are hereby approved, and payment for. said special co-Bond Counsel services, for a maximum fee not to exceed $15, 000.00, is hereby authorized, subject to final approval by the Boards of Directors to proceed with said transaction; and, Section 3: That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Letter Agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. xncnan "()-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (8) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "Q-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-68 APPROVING MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT WITH ROURKE, WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN TO SERVE AS THE DISTRICTS' CO-BOND COUNSEL FOR THE FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP (1993 SWAP) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7 , 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT WITH ROURKE, WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN TO SERVE AS CO-BOND COUNSEL FOR THE DISTRICTS' FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP (1993 SWAP) ttttttttt++++tttt+++++tt++tttttt++ WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, pursuant to financial needs and requirements described in its Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan adopted July 19, 1989, have determined to issue long- term debt obligations/securities and enter into other financial transactions to obtain the necessary funds to complete the development of its needed capital facilities and to manage said funds in the Districts' best interests; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore considered several well qualified legal firms to serve as their Bond Counsel, and Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin was selected as co-Bond Counsel, along with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, for the Districts' Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP) ; and, "R-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (8) (C) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-1" WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have heretofore directed the Fiscal Policy Committee and other finance team members to proceed with planning and implementation of the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP) with the potential of saving the Districts between $1 and $4 million, subject to final approval by the Boards of Directors. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the firm of Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin is hereby appointed and designated as co-Bond Counsel for the forthcoming Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP) ; and, Section 2 : That the terms and conditions of that certain Memorandum Agreement from Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, dated May 12, 1993 , are hereby approved, and payment for. said special co-Bond Counsel services, for a maximum fee not to exceed $5,000.00, is hereby authorized, subject to final approval by the Boards of Directors to proceed with said transaction; and, Section 3 : That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Memorandum Agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993 . rucn.me "R-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (8) (C) - ALL DISTRICTS "R-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-69 � APPROVING LETTER AGREEMENT WITH MERRILL LYNCH FOR UNDERWRITING SERVICES FOR THE ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION 1993 SERIES 1 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LETTER AGREEMENT WITH MERRILL LYNCH FOR UNDERWRITING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE DISTRICTS' ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION 1993 SERIES 1 +x++++xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx+xxxx WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, pursuant to financial needs and requirements described in its Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan adopted July 19, 1989, have determined to issue long- term debt obligations/securities and enter into other financial transactions to obtain the necessary funds to complete the development of its needed capital facilities and to manage said funds in the Districts' best interests; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore considered several well qualified underwriting firms to serve as their underwriter, and Merrill Lynch was selected as Underwriter for the Districts' Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have heretofore directed the Fiscal Policy Committee and other finance team members to proceed with planning and implementation of the Advance Refunding "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (9) (a) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-1" Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, with the potential of saving the Districts $2.5 million, subject to final approval by the Boards of Directors. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the firm of Merrill Lynch is hereby appointed and designated as Underwriter for the forthcoming Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1; and, Section 2: That the terms and conditions of that certain Letter Agreement from Merrill Lynch, dated May 7, 1993, are hereby approved; and, Section 3: That payment for said underwriting services, for an amount not to exceed $8.50 per $1,000 certificate for a fixed- rate structure, or $3.50 per $1,000 certificate for a synthetic fixed-rate structure, is hereby authorized, subject to final approval by the Boards of Directors to proceed with said transaction; and, Section 4: That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Letter Agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. eecnaw "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (9) (a) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-70 APPROVING LETTER AGREEMENT WITH ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE TO SERVE AS THE DISTRICTS' CO-BOND COUNSEL FOR THE ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION 1993 SERIES 1 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING LETTER AGREEMENT WITH ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE TO SERVE AS CO-BOND COUNSEL FOR THE DISTRICTS' ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION 1993 SERIES 1 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, pursuant to financial needs and requirements described in its Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan adopted July 19, 1989, have determined to issue long- term debt obligations/securities and to enter into other financial transactions to obtain the necessary funds to complete the development of its needed capital facilities and to manage said funds in the Districts' best interests; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore considered several well qualified legal firms to serve as their Bond Counsel, and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, was selected as co-Bond Counsel, along with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, for the Districts' Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have heretofore directed the Fiscal Policy Committee and other finance team members to proceed with planning and implementation of the Advance Refunding "T-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) ( 10) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-1" certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, with the potential of saving the Districts $2.5 million, subject to final approval by the Boards of Directors. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe is hereby appointed and designated as co-Bond Counsel for the forthcoming Advance Refunding certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1; and, Section 2: That the terms and conditions of that certain Letter Agreement from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, dated May 12, 1993, are hereby approved, and payment for said special co-Bond Counsel services, not to exceed the maximum amounts set forth below, is hereby authorized, subject to final approval by the Boards of Directors to proceed with said transaction: Maximum Type of Issue/Service Fee Fixed structure $60,000 Synthetic fixed structure 85,000 Expenses At Cost Section 3: That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Letter Agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. PAG"..aro "T-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (10)(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-71 APPROVING MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT WITH ROURKE. WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN TO SERVE AS THE DISTRICTS' CO-BOND COUNSEL FOR THE ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION 1993 SERIES 1 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MEMORANDUM AGREEMENT WITH ROURKE, WOODRUFF & SPRADLIN TO SERVE AS CO-BOND COUNSEL FOR THE DISTRICTS' ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION 1993 SERIES 1 WHEREAS, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, pursuant to financial needs and requirements described in its Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan adopted July 19, 1989, have determined to issue long- term debt obligations/securities and enter into other financial transactions to obtain the necessary funds to complete the development of its needed capital facilities and to manage said funds in the Districts' best interests; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore considered several well qualified legal firms to serve as their Bond Counsel, and Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin was selected as co-Bond Counsel, along with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, for the Districts' Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have heretofore directed the Fiscal Policy Committee and other finance team members to proceed with planning and implementation of the Advance Refunding "U-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (10) (c) - .ALL - DISTRICTS "U-1" Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, with the potential of saving the Districts $2.5 million, subject to final approval by the Boards of Directors. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the firm of Rourke, Woodruff 6 Spradlin is hereby appointed and designated as co-Bond Counsel for the forthcoming Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1; and, Section 2: That the terms and conditions of that certain Memorandum Agreement from Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, dated May 12, 1993, are hereby approved, and payment for said special co-Bond Counsel services, for a maximum fee not to exceed $5,000.00, is hereby authorized, subject to final approval by the Boards of Directors to proceed with said transaction; and, Section 3: That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Memorandum Agreement on behalf of the Districts. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. RAGn.m1 "U-2" AGENDA ITEM #14(b) (10) (C) - ALL DISTRICTS "U-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA May 18, 1993 loam Ewfi AVENUE 11:00 a.m. Vo.ep%81E7 2 Addenda roumuN VAuer.CALIFORNIA 927 01A19624 11 BID TABULATION Job No. P1-38-2 PROJECT TITLE: Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct miscellaneous improvements to facilities throughout Plant No. 1. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $5,000.000 BUDGET AMOUNT: $7.650.000 CONTRACTOR BID 1. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, Ontario, CA $3,364,600.00 2. Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. Upland, CA $3,383,789.00 3. Zisbarth & Alper and C.S. Alper Construction Co., Inc., a Joint Venture Huntington Beach, CA $3,859,000.00 4. Margate Construction, Inc., Carson, CA $3,878,600.00 5. Hunter Corporation, Carlsbad, CA $4,34O,OOO.00 6. BFI Constructors, Santa Ana, CA $4,934,350.00 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above � l p�refect and find that the low bid is a pa---" responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to� Ludwi ineers in the bid amount of $3,364,600.00 as the lowest and best bid. / 1,�, =T�iomas M. Daawewe s Director of Engineering "V-1" AGENDA ITEM #16(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-1" RESOLUTION NO. 93-72 AWARDING JOB NO, P1-38-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PRIORITY PROJECTS ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-38-2 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. In accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Boards of Directors, on November 8, 1989, authorized filing a Notice of Exemption in connection with the proposed project for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director . of Engineering that award of contract be made to Pascal @ Ludwig Engineers for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous* Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2, and bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2, be awarded to Pascal 4 Ludwig Engineers in the total amount of $3,364,600.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid "V-2" AGENDA ITEM #16(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-2" and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District 1 No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, �ar� 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held June 9, 1993. rc36j.072 "V-3" AGENDA ITEM #16(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "V-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 2, 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON MAY 129 1993 _ 01TATION 2J .`oyoliian O oaO�S)'P J g ( S+oc. 1954 NgNGE COU ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, B, B. 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on May 12, 1993,at 7:30 p.m.,In the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Noe. 1, 2,3, S. B, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: - ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Robert Richardwn, Chairmen Thomas E. Lutz • �_ Fred Barren,Chelrman pro tam Ga.Bayer James M. Ferryman Nate Reeds Thomas R.Saltairch Leslie PonFaus Roger Stanton Wiliam G.Steiner i DISTRICT NO.2: x John Collins, Chairman George Scott • Be Henry Garcia Wetlaa, Chairman pro tam _ John GNlixson • �_ Fred Garciane Beyer _ Bob Bell �, May cause McClanahan x Buck Catlin JMollyame McClanahan William P.ark,Mahoney James H.Flora x Maria J. Nelson Norman r Eckenrade Caney J. Nelson Glenn Parker 3_ Iry Hckler The e. _• Rogerusl(held• Thomas G. Lei • Ro Stanton William G. Steiner a_ George L. 21aka[ Sheldon Siraer DISTRICT NO.3: y_ Sal A. Settle, Chairman Don Martirez Searle Dunlap. Chairman pro tam Carrey J. Nelson Buck Catlin Molly McClanahan John Calling George Scott _ James V. Evans Margie L.Rice James H. Flora Wiliam D. Mahoney Don R.Griffin Arthur Brown Gail Kerry Cecilia L.Aga Frank Laszlo _ Gwen A. Forsythe _>L Thomas E. Lutz Robert Richardson a_ Eva G.Miner Wally Linn L. By Pickier Tam Daly y_ Jim Silva Earle Robitaille Sheldon Singer George L. Velez Roger Stanton William G. Steiner y_ Chad¢s Sylvia Ronald Bates DISTRICT NO.sh John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman _ Jan Deb ry Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tam Jan Debay Wiliam G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.S: i James A.Waller, Chairman Arthur Perry i_ Evelyn He",Chairman pro tam John C. Cox,Jr. William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: L Chades E. Puckett. Chairman Thomas R. Si James A.Wishner, Chairmen pro Lem Mike Scheeler _x Fred Barren Gone Beyer Jan Debay Pho Sansone Barry Hammond Mike Ward • Ted Moreno Miguel Pulido • William G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.11: Jt_ Grace Winchell, Chairman Eels Robitaille Victor Leipzig,Chairman pro tam Jim Silva Roger Stanton William G. Steiner 's • DISTRICT NO. 13t John M.Gullboron, Chairman _ Henry W. Wedas Fred Barren,Chairman pro Lem Gana Beyer Glenn Parker Bonnie Dunlap •; L Iry Pickier Tom Daly William G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.14: . Poor A. Swan.Chairman DNryI Miller ` y Leslie Pontlaus, Chairman pro tam Charles E. Puckett Asa/ Fred Bamera Gera Beyer v Barry Hammond Mike Ward L William G.Steiner Roger Stanton —2— 05/12/93 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Corinne Clawson, Patti Gorczyca, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, John Linder, �..✓ Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, Kim Patton, Mary Simpson, Dale Sparks, Chuck Winsor, Ray Young, Paula Zellor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Carolyn Bruskin, Jamil Demir, Domenic A. Defeo, Jr., Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Phil Stone DISTRICT 1 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman Pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tern of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 . It was then moved: That Director Robert Richardson be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Richardson as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Fred Barrera be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Barrera as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 2 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman Pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2. It was then moved: That Directors Henry W. Wedaa and John Collins be nominated as candidates for the office of Chairman. The vote was then polled by written ballot, following which the Assistant Secretary announced that Director Collins had been elected Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Henry W. Wedaa be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Barrera as Chairman pro tem. , -3- 05/12/93 DISTRICT 3 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman oro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3. It was then moved: That Director Sal Sapien be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sapien as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Burnie Dunlap be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Dunlap as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 5 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5. It was then moved: That Director John C. Cox, Jr, be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Cox as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Phil Sansone be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sansone as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 6 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6. It was then moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Cox as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Evelyn Hart be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hart as `.J Chairman pro tem. -4- 05/12/93 DISTRICT 7 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7. It was then moved: That Director Charles E. Puckett be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled , and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Puckett as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wahner as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 11 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11. It was then moved: That Director Grace H. Winchell be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Winchell as �✓ Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Victor Leipzig be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Leipzig as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 13 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman Pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13. It was then moved: That Director John Gullixson be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Gullixson as ' Chairman. -5- 05/12/93 It was further moved: That Director Fred Barrera be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Barrera as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 14 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14. It was then moved: That Director Peer A. Swan be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Swan as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Leslie A. Pontious be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Pontious as Chairman pro tem. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized Domenic A. Recognition of persons who wish to Defeo, Jr., a former employee of the be heard on matters of general Districts, who addressed the Boards interest regarding his recent termination from employment with the Districts during his probationary period and requested a review. In response to Directors' questions regarding the policies and procedures for grievances for terminated probationary employees, the Joint Chairman and General Counsel explained that this was an administrative matter handled through the Personnel Office and no action could be taken at this time. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman briefly reviewed the Presentation of PRIDE Awards to _ Districts' PRIDE program which rewards employees employees for creative suggestions with an economic or safety benefit to the Districts. He reported that at its last meeting, the Fiscal Policy Committee approved ten PRIDE cost-saving or safety suggestion awards to employees totaling $4,856.00. Chairman Mahoney then asked Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations, to come forward and assist in the presentation of the maximum award amount of $1,500.00 to employee Dale Sparks. Mr. Ooten reported that Dale Sparks' suggestion, resulting in automation of a task that was previously done manually, is estimated to save the Districts approximately $30,000.00. The Joint Chairman commended the employee for his PRIDE suggestion and presented Mr. Sparks with his $1,500.00 cash award and certificate of appreciation. -6- 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the Report of the Joint Chairman tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, May 19th, at 5:30 p.m. Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Ocean Monitoring - Wednesday, May 26th, at 4:30 p.m., immediately preceeding the Executive/Fiscal Policy , Committees' meeting Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees - Wednesday, May 26th, at 5:30 p.m. (Directors Eva Miner and Maria Moreno were also invited to attend.) Personnel Committee - Thursday, May 27th, at 5:30 p.m. Engineering and Construction Committee - Wednesday, June 2nd at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that in 1981 Report of the General Manager the Districts were one of the founding members of the Southern California Energy Coalition, which is a consortium of both private and public organizations, started in Orange County, that are high-energy users. The users in this consortium agreed with the Southern California Edison (SCE) to reduce energy demands during peak periods. SCE then pays the members a standby amount so that if they have to call upon them they can shed energy load so Edison's system doesn't go down or into rolling brown-outs. Since this program has been implemented the Districts have received $1.2 million and never had to shed except during practice runs. Mr. Sylvester then reported that for 1992 the Districts received a check for $185,000.00. The General Manager then stated that staff had been unsuccessful trying to schedule a second new Directors' Orientation and Treatment Plant tour. He suggested that those Directors that would like a briefing and plant tour contact him and arrangements would be made on an individual basis. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -7- 05/12/93 DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -8- 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of Payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and �..� are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 04/07/93 04/21/93 ALL DISTRICTS , Joint Operating Fund - $ 956,513.63 $630,705.82 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,087,962.84 529,701 .49 Joint Working Capital Fund - 131,944.79 123,995.89 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 8,033.69 30,169.91 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 427.97 52.51 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 26,457.32 79,681 .69 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 18,672.11 22,146.81 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 256,915.82 20,767.24 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 292.61 48.49 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 41,914.99 20,910.08 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 461 .19 924.10 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 95.61 .00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 39,938.96 333.83 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 28,365.75 53.64 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,285.88 .00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 9,650.54 302.61 - 53,609,933.70 51 .459J94.11 �...� ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Five Flatbed Trucks. Specification No. A-168. to That the bid tabulation and recommendation Los Angeles Freightliner/GMC re award of Purchase of Five Flatbed Trucks, Specification No. A-168, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Los Angeles Freightliner/GMC for a total amount not to exceed $115,530.80 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Microcomputer Hardware. Software and Associated Peripherals. That the bid tabulation and recommendation Specification No. E-229, to GST Inc. re award of purchase order contract for Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, Specification No. E-229, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to GST, Inc. for nine systems, for a total amount not to exceed $31,557.25 plus sales tax. �..� -9- 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to bioMerieux Vitek. Inc. for That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to Purchase of bioMerieux Vitek Jr. issue a purchase order to bioMerieux Vitek, �i Bacteria Identification System Inc. in the amount of $37,130.00, plus (Specification No. E-230) sales tax and freight, for Purchase of bioMerieux Vitek Jr. Bacteria Identification System, (Specification No. E-230). Approving Change Order No. 21 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the plans and specifications for Job No. J-19-1 That Change Order No. 21 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $192,366.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for three items of additional work or other contract adjustments, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Job No. P1-38-2 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-45, approving plans and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-38-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish May 18, 1993 as the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. `.J ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee certification John Carollo Engineers for design, of the final negotiated fee relative to construction support services and Addendum No. 3 to the Professional preparation of operation and Services Agreement with John Carollo maintenance manuals for Job Engineers for design, construction support Nos. P1-38 and P2-43 services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional engineering services for seismic work as provided in the agreement and to incorporate additional changes in the scope of work, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-46, approving Addendum No. 3 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $527,600.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $1,991,565.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,519,165.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a �..� part of these minutes. -10- 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aooroving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Dames & Moore. Inc.. a Delaware Resolution No. 93-47, approving Addendum Corporation for Job Nos. P1-38-3 and No. 3 to the Professional Services �✓ P2-43-2 Agreement with Dames & Moore, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, to conduct Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $840,620.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting That the Selection Committee certification Engineers for Job Nos. P1-40-2 and of the final negotiated fee relative to the P2-47-2 Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-48, approving said agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for said services, on an hourly-basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, �..✓ subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $549,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is Professional Services Agreement hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum with Brown and Caldwell Consulting_ No. 2 to the Professional Services Engineers for planning design and Agreement with Brown and Caldwell construction services for Job Consulting Engineers for planning, design Nos. J-11-1 . J-26, J-27. P2-23-5-1, and construction services in connection with P2-35-2. P2-35-3. P2-35-4 and master-planned support facilities at Plants 1 P2-35-5 and 2 (includes Job Nos. J-11-1, J-26, J-27, P2-23-5-1 , P2-35-2, P2-35-3, P2-35-4 and P2-35-5) providing for changes to the original scope of work. -11- 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate an That the Selection Committee be, and is �.� agreement for Environmental and hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and Geotechnical Services. Specification negotiate an agreement for Environmental No. 5-070 and Geotechnical Services, Specification No. S-070, for various collection system and treatment plant projects to be constructed over the next three years. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committee Committee's meeting and Executive Policy Committee's meeting held on April 21, 1993 and April 28, 1993, respectively, be and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1 , and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP) Approving Orrick. Herrington and Sutcliffe to serve as special bond counsel Moved, seconded and duly carried: That selection of Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe to serve as special bond counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP, (1993 SWAP), be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby request a fee proposal for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -12- 05/12/93 Approving Rourke. Woodruff & Spradlin to serve as co-counsel Moved, seconded and duly carried: That selection of Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin to serve as co-counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP, (1993 SWAP), be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby request a fee proposal for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Directing staff and General Counsel to recommend that Merrill Lynch utilize Brown and Wood or Jones. Hall. Hill or other acceptable counsel to serve as underwriter's counsel Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized and directed to recommend that Merrill Lynch, Districts' underwriter, utilize either the firm of Brown and Wood or the firm of Jones, Hall, Hill and White, or other acceptable counsel, to serve as underwriter's counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -13- 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Owner-Controlled Wrap Insurance Program Authorizing staff and General Counsel to take steps necessary to seek approval by the State Leaislature of an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized to take steps necessary to seek approval by the State Legislature of an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program for Districts' construction projects. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizing staff and Robert F. Driver Associates. Districts' insurance consultant/broker. to report back with further information on an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up ... Insurance Program Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and Robert F. Driver Associates, Districts' insurance consultant/broker, be, and are hereby, authorized and directed to report back with further information on an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program for Districts' construction projects, a draft of such a plan and an implementation schedule. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Declaring the 1993-94 Sewer Use Fees and Connection Fees will not That the Boards of Directors do hereby increase from rates established for declare that the 1993-94 Sewer Use Fees the 1992-93 fiscal year and Connection Fees will not increase from rates established for the 1992-93 fiscal year and will continue to be in effect for 1993-94, provided the Governor and State Legislature do not confiscate Districts' property taxes, as follows: �.J -14- 05/12/93 ANNUAL SEWER USE FEES - 1993-94 District Single-Family Multi-Family Non-Residential No. Residential Residential Properties �✓ 1 5 83.24 $49.94/Unit $59.52/1,000 SF 2 71 .52 42.91/Unit 51 .14/1,000 SF 3 73.89 44.33/Unit 52.83/1,000 SF 5 96.75 58.05/Unit 69.18/1,000 SF 6 76.47 45.88/Unit 54.68/1 ,000 SF 7 50.09 30.05/Unit 35.81/1 ,000 SF 11 60.00 36.00/Unit 42.90/1 ,000 SF 13 100.00 60.00/Unit 71 .50/1,000 SF 14 NONE - District No. 14 is fully funded by IRWD CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION FEES - 1993-94 DISTRICTS NO. 1 . 2. 3. 5, 6, 7. 11 & 13 RESIDENTIAL S2,350/DWELLING UNIT �✓ NON-RESIDENTIAL $470/1,000 SQUARE FEET, $2,350 MINIMUM DISTRICT NO. 14 NONE trict No. 14 if fully funded by IRWD Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff and General Counsel to draft an amendment to the That staff and General Counsel be, and are Districts' Ordinance Establishing hereby, authorized and directed to draft an Source Control Fees. Administrative amendment to the Districts' Ordinance Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees Establishing Source Control Fees, and Miscellaneous Charges Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges for introduction and first reading at the regular June meeting of the Boards of ' Directors, to adjust or establish said fees in the amounts determined necessary to recover the Districts' costs. -15- 05/12/93 Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICTS 1.2.5.6.7.11 .13&14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: �i Directing that no further study be given re modifying sewer connection That the Boards of Directors do hereby fees direct that no further study be given to the issue of modifying sewer connection fees and that no change be made to the existing policy that does not allow fee adjustments. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt as amended, establishing a 1993 Resolution No. 93-49, amending Summer Work Program Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a 1993 Summer Work Program for painting, grounds maintenance and pump station maintenance work. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Urging Equitable Allocation of Property Taxes and State Support of That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt School Funding in California Resolution No. 93-50, Urging Equitable Allocation of Property Taxes and State Support of School Funding in California before consideration of further Property Tax Shifts. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -16- 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Districts' Two-Way Radio System/County-Wide 800 MHz Radio System Authorizing staff to continue to monitor the progress and ' development of the proposed new County-Wide 800 MHz Radio System Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to continue to monitor the progress and development of the proposed new County-Wide 800 MHz Radio System and, upon receipt of additional information, assess the advisability of the Districts' participation in the system and report back to the Boards; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff in the interim continue to maintain the Districts' existing 453 MHz Two-Way Radio system in a state of readiness and repair to meet the Districts' day-to-day and emergency radio communications needs. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Motorola Communications and Electronics. Inc. for Purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment (Specification No. E-227) Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. in the amount of $38,383.00 plus sales tax, for Purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment (Specification No. E-227). Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -17- 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve the written report of the Conservation, Recycle That the written report of the Conservation, and Reuse Committee Recycle and Reuse Committee's meeting held on April 27, 1993, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors of General Counsel's Comments Prior to the need for a closed session as authorized Closed Session by Government Code Section 54956.9 to review: 1) Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to the co-generation internal combustion engines. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at 8:07 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. `.� ALL DISTRICTS At 8:28 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. DISTRICTS 1 & 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and No. 2-30 specifications for Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, authorizing a net addition of $78,273.22 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company for five items of additional or modified work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993. -18- 05/12/93 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving an exchange of ownership Agreement with the City of Placentia That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-51-2, approving an �..� exchange of ownership Agreement between the City of Placentia and County Sanitation District No. 2, providing for transfer of ownership of the Palm Avenue Purchase to the City of Placentia. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. - DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993. DISTRICT 7 Actions relative to Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-14-1-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1 , Contract No. 7-14-1-1, granting a time extension of 33 calendar days to the contract with Silveri & LeBouef for completion of said work due to inclement weather, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Contract No. 7-14-1-1 as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-55-7, accepting Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1 as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -19- 05/12/93 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Grant of Easement to Crow Winthrop Development for 10' That the Board of Directors hereby adopts �J right-of-way re Contract No. 7-11-2 Resolution No. 93-56-7, approving and authorizing execution of Grant of Easement to Crow Winthrop Development for 10' right-of-way required to install a new sewer line over the northeasterly corner of District's Michelson Pump Station site, Contract No. 7-11-2 in exchange for a Quitclaim of abandoned sewer line in a 10' easement located on said site from Crow Winthrop Development. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Order Relieving That the Summons and Complaint for Order Petitioner from provisions of Relieving Petitioner from provisions of Government Code, Section 945.4, Government Code, Section 945.4, Loyd T. Loyd T. Nitzen II vs. Orange County Nitzen, II vs. Orange County Sanitation Sanitation District Case No. 708855 District, Case No. 708855, relative to an application for leave to file late claim that was denied by the District in connection with a vehicle accident in the vicinity where routine sewer maintenance was being performed in the City of Tustin by District's crews, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the District. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Amendment No. 1 to Lease Agreement with General Telephone That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Company re Slater Avenue Pump Resolution No. 93-57-11, approving Station Amendment No. 1 to Lease Agreement with General Telephone Company re Slater Avenue Pump Station, authorizing an extension of lease agreement for an additional three years at the current rate of $1,900.00 per year. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993. -20- 05/12/93 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993. � DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer. Phase 3, Contract That the Board of Directors hereby adopts No. 5-34-3. as complete Resolution No. 93-53-5, accepting Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Actions re Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer. between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4 Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that the 1989 Master Plan had found that the existing sewer in Pacific Coast Highway was hydraulically inadequate to meet long-term flow projections. The sewer, built in 1936, is also failing and its replacement and/or rehabilitation for structural reasons is more urgent now than for future hydraulic needs. CALTRANS is planning to reconstruct and resurface Coast Highway between Newport Boulevard and Dover Drive in Newport Beach between February and June 1994. Therefore, this project has been accelerated in order to be completed prior to the start of the CALTRANS work. The Director of Engineering then narrated a brief video depicting the inside of the failing sewer. Mr. Dawes stated that plans and specifications are now complete for this project, the reach between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive. The CALTRANS work is being coordinated with the Districts' project, the needs of the adjacent business and residential communities, and with the needs identified by the City of Newport Beach. The sewer line work between Newport Boulevard and Dover Drive is scheduled to begin construction in September 1993 with completion by January 1994. -21- 05/12/93 He further stated that there have been several public meetings between the Districts' engineering staff and the Mariners' Mile Business Association, as well as the adjacent business and residential communities. As a result, a portion of the sewer replacement will include rehabilitation by either the �J insituform method or by insertion of a high density polyethylene pipe into the existing pipe (approximately 3,200 feet of 24-inch pipe) to minimize construction impacts on the community. Mr. Dawes explained alternatives considered and several of the measures being taken to mitigate impacts on the business and residential communities. The balance of the project will involve replacement of approximately 3,100 feet of 30-inch pipe and reconstruction of all manholes. Mr. Dawes also stated that as part of Contract No. 5-37-4, the Districts will identify utilities that will have a critical bearing on the selected alignment for future Contract No. 5-37-3, between the Arches and Bitter Point Pump Station, tentatively scheduled for fall 1994. The specifications provide for a bonus of $500 per day for early job completion plus a $1,000 per day bonus for early completion of the rehabilitation work. Late completion will result in identical liquidated damage assessments. The engineer's estimate for this project is $1 .8 million. He then reported that westerly of the Arches, Pacific Coast Highway has already been reconstructed by CALTRANS. Alignment studies are still being conducted by the Districts' consultant to determine the optimal alignment for this reach to minimize disruptions to a newly reconstructed Pacific Coast Highway. This reach will involve full replacement with larger carrier pipes to `.� meet future hydraulic capacity requirements. The design of this reach will be completed by year-end with construction starting after Contract No. 5-37-4 is completed. Approving plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-37-4 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-52, approving plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:35 p.m., May 12, 1993. -22- 05/12/93 DISTRICT 5 Actions re Crystal Cove Pump Station. Contract No. 5-36 Verbal staff Report The Director of Engineering reported that in March, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-36, the new Crystal Cove Pump Station, which will serve the down coast developing areas adjacent to Crystal Cove. This pump station is an essential element within the new South Coast Trunk Sewer System, Phase 2, which was recently awarded to Mike Prlich & Sons under Contract No. 5-35-2. The Crystal Cove Pump Station will receive flow from the upstream gravity sewer system and discharge flow into the new double-barrel force main system being built under Contract No. 5-35-2. Mr. Dawes stated that on April 13, 1993, 13 bids were received for this project. The bids ranged from a high of $1,331,633.00 to a low of $993,442.00, submitted by Schuler Engineering Corporation and recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. Approving Addendum No 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-36 �..✓ Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, making miscellaneous modifications and clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-36 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, making miscellaneous modifications and clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. -23- 05/12/93 Awarding Contract No. 5-36 • Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-54-5, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, to Schuler Engineering Corporation, in the total amount of $993,442.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:38 p.m., May 12, 1993. DISTRICT 3 At the April 14th meeting, District 3 Consideration of request to reduce Directors received a request to reduce sewer sewer connection charges for Park connection fees from Jan Development Co., Stanton Place Senior Citizen and Chairman Sal Sapien, Stanton City Apartments in the City of Stanton Councilman, for the Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton. After considerable discussion, because sewer connection fees are administered in accordance with a uniform policy adopted by all Districts and any modifications could have Districts'-wide implications, the matter was referred to the Fiscal Policy Committee. The Joint Chairman recognized District 3 Chairman Sapien who stated that he had submitted this request that is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Stanton. He noted that the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee reviewed the issue at length and have recommended that no further study be given to the issue of modifying sewer connection fees and that no change be made to the existing policy that does not allow for any fee adjustments. The other Districts concurred in that recommendation earlier on the agenda. He also noted that he believed support for this type of project is important with a growing senior citizen population and limited availability of affordable housing. Chairman Sapien had requested that the matter be placed on the May 12, 1993 agenda for separate consideration by District No. 3 Directors. He also directed staff and the General Counsel to draft an ordinance for introduction in the event the Directors give favorable consideration to the request. -24- 05/12/93 The Board then entered into a discussion of the issue during which several Directors spoke in support and in opposition to granting a reduction in fees for the project. At issue was the equitability of adjusting fees for one segment of the community and its impact on others in the overall fee structure, and on the relevant programs of both the Districts and the cities as well, notwithstanding the worthiness of the project. It was also pointed out that any such adjustment could also impact the other Sanitation Districts and that if it were to be considered, it should be in the context of providing an overall evaluation of the entire fee structure. Although support for projects of this type was expressed, it was the consensus that reduction of the sewer connection charge was inappropriate at this time. It was then moved and seconded that no action be taken on the request for a reduction of the District 3 sewer connection charges for the Park Stanton Place project. Following a roll call vote the Assistant Secretary reported that the motion had passed by virtue of 10 Directors voting in favor, and 5 Directors against. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried that the matter of reviewing the Districts' fee structure be referred to the Joint Boards for consideration. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:02 p.m., May 12, 1993. AwleVIA(W Assistant Se tar f the Boards of Directors of County Sanitati Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 `rsJ -25- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3131/93 PAGE 1 REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTI NUNtlEp APN CLAIMS PAID 04/01/93 POSTING DATE 09/07/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126927 AS TECH COMPANY 469.328.2, RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.20-9-91 128928 AGA CORPORATION S1.071.90 GAUGE 12B929 AN BEST COMPANY S90.00 BOORS 128930 A T A i $3.831.6b LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SSRVICEH 128931 AMERICAN TELEPHONE A TELE6RAFH $1,214.71 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE BERYICRB 120932 A T 6 1 $195.77 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 128933 ACLU-LABS RESEARCH INC 150.60 LAB SERVICES 128934 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP S3V088.00 RNGINEERING HBRVICE8.14.0.)1-18-92 128935 AIR ACCESSORIES CO 955.96 FILTER 128936 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC $180.86 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS 128937 AIR PRODUCTS t CHEMICAL . IN $603.58 INSTRUMENT BVPPLIRB_ _ __ 328939 ALL ASOCIEAN FOR LT 62T.00 ASPHAPUBLICATION 129939 AMER SOCIETY FOR MI CROBIOLG $152.i0 PUBLICATION 12891C ANERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLEC IN .. . . ._. $929.46 LAB SUPPLIES_. 128911 AN ICON. INC H29.16 LAB SUPPLIES 120942 AMRESCO. INC $97.86 LAB SUPPLIES 128943 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION .. .. $23.643.00 SEWER REPAIR DIET SAG 128911 ANDATACO S615.71 LAB BUFFETED X 128915 BLAKE P ANDERSON $73.85 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT = 120946 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL .. $230.00 _ SERVICE AGRBZNSKY 128947 A-PLUS SYSTEMS S172.96 NOTICES 8 ADS - 128948 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS INC $364.70 LAB SUPPLIES 1 126949 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING.. 62.101.3E __ _ PAYROLL SERVICES 128950 STY PORTABLE SERVICES $85.31 PORTABLE RSSTROON____- - -- --" --' n 228951 BAR LANDFILL S3.393.61 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 F. 128952 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 4 526.5 Z. BATTE0.I68 128953 BARTER DIaGNOSTI CS INC - i1.339.93 LAB SUPPLIES—' 128954 ROBERT bE1N WILLIAM FROST $2.112.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-33 128955 BELL SECURITY _ 5915.Ok_._. TRMPORARY 8ECORITT SERVICES 120956 6T DILLARD INC $616.97 - _- MECHANICAL REPAIRS ---- ------ --- _ --'----'- 128951 BIOMENIEUK V1TEN INC $40.629.16 LAB EQUIPMENT 126958 810 TECH NET. INC _ ...S27.51 BERVICR AGRESMRNT 120960 BON-E-RUES ENGINEERING t305.18 _ .. TRUCK-PARTS ... ._. _.. ._._ 128961 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP t19.1O1.1B SMGINEERIPA 86RVICEB 7-7-1 128961 BROWNIN EE ELECTRIC _ __.33B.20_ . ELECTRIC PARTS 120962 BROWN i ITORIAL CONSULTING $1,650.00 --eNGINeBRING�eRVICES PI'77— 120963 BUREAU JANITORIAL {1.650.00 TRAINING V BUPPLIEe 120961 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE _.. . .__ 155.92_ _.__.. TRAINING VIDEO VALVES'_.. 129966 GARKE ENGINEERING CO 5530.11 PETTY CABN "IMBUMEMBNT 128967 GPRY W SYNCED si.904.53 126968 CAC PRESS INC Sy49.15 __ VALVPUBLIE ATION PARTS . ..—VALVE TARTS 12E9b9 CS COMPANY SE99.21 12P969 CALIFORNIA SUAND VIDEO GATE NB1.16 CAMERA )MEMBMORNIRSHIP NG 128972 CALN CAMERAS AND VIDEO .237.99_ CAMRM RING SE 128971 JOMN CaR OLEO ENGINEERS i29.231.71 ENGINEERING SEUVICBH'P3=]S;'P1-]f-"'—"---"-' —' 128972 CENTURY PAINT 6215.3E PAINT SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST VURMINU CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/93 PA4E 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAINL COUNTY . . CLAIMS PAID 04/07/93 POSTING DATE U4/47/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION - 120973 CENTURT SAFETY INST L SUPP 414.b60.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128974 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING 56.878.25 STORAGE UNIT 128975 COLICH AND SONS 41,174,936.40 CONSTRUCTION I-9 128976 COLLEGE PLACEMENT COUNCIL i23T.05 SUBSCRIPTION 128977 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $2.605.00 FITTINGS 128978 COMPUSA. INC. $05.38 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 120979 CONNELL 69 PARTS / DIV S16.37 TRUCK PARTS 12090C CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL UIST $6.735.27 ELECTRIC PARTS 12T981 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC &1.200.52 TOOLS 128962 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $1.616.25 CRLDRINE R.0.30-9-91 128983 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC 31.O6b.0U INSTRUMENT PARTS 128984 COSTAR CORP 3198.26 LAB SUPPLIES 128965 STATE BOARS OF EQUILIIATION $255.47 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEES 126986 DAPPER 71RE 351E.51 . TIRES GLASS _.. . . . .. .. ._. ._... 128987 BE GUELLE i SUNS GLASS CO $167.88 Lpg SUPPLIES 128988 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS S189.53 _ INSTRUMENT SUMBNT PARTS_ __ l+7 128989 DELTRON INC $169.84 - 12B990 OEZURIN AND/OR CS CO 36.909.2E VALVES = 128991 OIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $3.867.75 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-12-92 �-+ 128992 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $1.293.44 PAINTING _ 128993 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP $1,154.30 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 228994 DOR ADO ENTERPRISES INC $3,393.60 PLANT HAINTSNANCB 6 REPAIRS 128995 DUNN EDW ARDS CGNP 531G d3. PAINT SUPPLIES n 128996 DOYALS SALES 3132.98 FITTINGS 1 128991 El" CO/NBS SUPPLY 34.c93.84 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES N BNOINBBRING SBRVICBG P2-44 12899E EMA SERVICES INC 52.126.39. __ . SUPPLIES 1290DO E S S S192$715.10 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129001 EAGLE TM EIS TRIBUT[N4 5715.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129002 ELECTRN INC 16.712.08._ .. _. 129002 ELE[TPo-TEST INC i915.04 ELeCTRICALSBAVIC88 129003 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SLRVICES S3.542.OU PROPEBSIONAL SERVICES 129004 ENCHANTER INC $3.920.0D OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-30-92 129005 JDSEPH EVAMS $2.500.00 DEFERRED COMP"WITHDRAWAL- ' - - --" --- '- 129006 CHARLES EVANS a ASSOC. $59.201.00 CONBVLT2N0 SERVICES - LAB 129007 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $3.9g0.G0_ RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 12900E FEDERAL EXPRESS CURT $ $68.10 PROFANBIGHT 129009 FERX ELLLAS f6B.10 PROPANE 129010 FISCHER L PORTER CO _. 4Y.513.14 CLAB SUPPHLUAIRATIOLIESN.PARTS 12901 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CD 5 .54 yAg SUPPLIES 129012 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $13 3T3.5 CONCRETE CUTTING 129013 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. $296.Y4_. _. -PUMP PARTS ---' "'-" --"- --- - - -----'---" 129C14 FLO-SYSTEMS 53.129.0E 129C15 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMLRA $61.05 FILM INSTRUMENT BUPPLI68 129016 THE FOXBORO CO i3.807a45 ._ . OFFICE SUPPLIED __.._.. .___ .._._ .... ..__... .. 12901 GET, INC. 52.904.9E LUMBER/HARDWARE 129018 4ANA ML LU Mtl ER CO 5865.22 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YURNIN4 CAFITAL PNOCESSIN6 GATE 3/31/93 FA4L A REPORT NUMBER AP43 CUUNTV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNT _ CLAIMS PAID 04/07/93 POSTING DATE 04/07/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129019 GARRATT-CALLAMAN COMPANY f6.U11.78 CUEMICALB 229620 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 41.297.9i INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129021 GENERAL TELEPHONE IS $170.24 THIMPHOME BBRVICES 129022 GIENLICH-MIICHELL INC 41,567.52 PUMP PARTS 129023 N GLANTZ B SON 6585.75 BUILDING MATERIALS 129624 DON GREEM t ASSOCIATES t1.755.00 SURVBTING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 ' 129025 NO TYPE S GRAPHICS f1.292.79 PRINTING 129026 MACH COMPANY $325.22 LAB SUPPLIES 129027 PL HAWN CO INC - $207.03 FILTERS - -" 129028 HELLO 9252.70 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT 129C29 MOERBIGLR CVS CALIF INC $211.41 COMPRESSOR PARTS 119030 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO fAJ9.45 LAB SUPPLIES 129031 RS HUGHES CO INC f76..04 PAINT SUPPLIES 129P32 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUbVLR STA 41.163.7U OFFICE SUPPLIES 129433 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN L f7T.49 BICYCLE PARTS - -' 129034 ISC $6.244.63 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES m 129635 IMPERIAL %EST CHEMICAL T4:323.29 _ FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O. 11-I8-92 X 12963E INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS f1N25.23 00 CONNECTORS 2 229030 III IMF DRTENT t25.0O FREIGHT S 12903E INGR AM FIFER y5♦145.32 OICRO SUPPLIES D OU NICf10YICM8 READER LBA88 129039 JLA CREDIT CORP $434.16 129041 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 9348.03 DIRJAIECTORS'TORIAL MEETIN 8 129042 JAY'S SUSPENSION 3$35.60 _ RUCK REP' MEETING EXPENSE n 129043 JIM.S SUSPENSION SERVICE 220.31 ELECTRIC REPAIRS "- - - ' 1290A3 JONIISTDCH SUPPLY .930.63 BLSCTRIC SUPPLIES W 129045 JONES CREMICRIN INC 32.W0.63 LABCHS SUALS 1290A5 NETTENbURG MARINE t71.08 �� - LAB BTRPLIBS 129046 KING BEARING INC $669.51 MACHINE SUPPLIES 129047 NNOR INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 42,773.18 _ HAIM BUPPLI68 129048 MARTIN MORDICN SO $3.248.25 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 '- - -- "'- 129049 THE LAST POND 1655.00 COMPUTER 88RVIC88 129050 LAYMAN9 JONES A DYE. LAWYERS $733.50 LEGAL 88RVIC88 - COOPER IND. 129051 LEGI-TECH $320.00 PUBLICATION 229052 LEE t RO CONSULTING EGON f18.687.19 ENGINEERING 88RVIC88 P1-38-5 129053 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 40.562.71 JSIP FIELD SAMPLING PROGRAM 129054 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $933.33 - OCEAN MDNITORING " "'"' -- 129055 NOT BIOLOGIC COMPANY $255.06 SERVICE AGR88HENT 129056 NEC ANALYTICAL STSTEMS INC. $4,818.6, LAB 88RVIC88 129057 MPS Si23.74 PHOTOGRAPHIC 86RVIC68 - 129058 NSA 946.93 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129059 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC $2,323.53. MECHANICAL PARTS 12906E MARVAC ELECTRONICS $42.87 - - INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES - - -- 129061 MATT - CMLOR INC 9634.59 CHLORINATION PARTS 129062 MCGAHRT CENTRAL TYPLWRITLN 1 3096.7E OFFICE EQUIPMENT 129063 MEMOREX $35701 LAB BUPPLI68 129064 MICROA6E OF CLRRITDS &%B5.97 OFFICE EQUIPMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31193 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY - - -- CLAIMS PAID L4/U7/93 POSTING DATE 64/67/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 12906E MIDWAY MFG C MACHINING a23.229.20 MBcwwl L PARTS 129066 MINNLSOTA YESTLRN VISUAL PRES. - S.T.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES _ 129067 MISSION INDUSTRIES 36.222.6E UNIFORM SERVICE 129068 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $16,706.97 CONSTRUCTION 2-30 129069 MONTGOMERY MATSON 312.923.53 ENGINEERING SERVICES 129070 XOORE S TA BCP 529.150.00 BACKFILLING szRVICes 129071 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC $166.96 NRRUNARR 129072 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION AS 5173.26 BOOKS 129073 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE. A a82.00 SUBSCRIPTION 129074 THE OHNART CORP $934.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS - 129075 OR SYSTEMS CO a23.913.OG CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 129076 OMEGA ENGINEERING. INC $1.261.76 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129677 ON-LINE ELECTRONICS 6207.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 129078 ORACLE CORPORATION 41.060.64 TRAINING REGISTRATION - - 129079 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C f119.24 TRUCK PARTS 129080 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO $1.534.83 CHNNICALS 129081 ORANGE COURIER . .. 3233.50. COURIER BBRVICBS _ - f7l 129082 ORANGE YALYc t i1TlINb CO. i1.BTS.50 FITTINGS Z BBCURI SRRVICZS SPECIALTY 18888 129083 OSCAR-S LOCK A SAFE 5117.62 ASSRS G -. 1290414 OXYGEN SERVICE _ 42,560.12. _ TA 129Oa5 COUNTY OF ORANGE f5.760.00 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES- "-- - 129086 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 38d33.69 WORKERS COMP DISTRIBUTION 129087 PC SYSTEMS DESIGN _ ._ _ 349546E _ COMPUTER SAMOVARS _ ]a 12908E FEET $2.284.55 HEWER VID80 INePBCTION- - - 1290B9 PACIFIC PARTS fA 168.34 INSTRUMENTATION t .129090 PAC I F I C SAP I iY EOU IPMENT. CU ... 3301.96 __ SAFETY SUPPLIES 129091 PACIFIC SFYER MAINTENANCE. C 92.114.00 OTHER REPAIRS 129092 PACIFIC SELL 9651.93 9ELSPHONE SERVICES 129093 FACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS _ . 61.734.00.__ . T8LBP110N8 eYBTBN NODIFIGTIONB 129094 FAURE JANITORIAL SUPP a235.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129095 PALMIER L TVLEM. GILNLR9 $566.60 LEGAL SRRVIGB 18-1-IA 129096 PANAGON CABLE. .. . f1fi.iB .. CABLE SERVICRS 129097 PARTS UNLIMITED f112.18 TRUCK PARTS - -" 12909E RAREST PETERS a296.42 GARNISHMENT OVERPAYMENT 129099 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $162.168.13 _ .. RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 - 129100 PITNEY DUNES CREDIT CORP a390.51 POSTAGE MACHINE LEVEE 129101 POLTHETRICS. INC. 31.436.WS SERVICE AGRESM" 129102 POLTPURE INC 415.172.49 GTIONIC POLYMER H.O.3-11-92 _. . OFFICE SUPPLIES 129103 PALSENTATION PRODUCTS 1456.2E 1CR 2291CS PROCES PRIMROSE ICE. $78.00 129166 PROFESS LQUIPMLNTSERVI COMPANY i569.TB PUMP PARTS 1291G6 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IRO. 52.099.14 GROURDSMATIG"BUPPPECT 1291L7 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 34.464.00 INSTRVMPNTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 129108 YUESTRON CORP $5.432.40 LAB SUPPLIES 129109 RJU COMPUTER SERVICES INC i29.687.74 COMPUTER SERVICES N.0.8-12-92- 129I16 R M CONTROLS $151.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT LIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/93 PAGE 5 RRPURT MURDER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CDUN TT _.. .. CLAIMS PAID U4/67/93 POSTING DATE 44/07/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129111 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO 4109.91 LAB SUPPLIES 129112 RED VALVE CO INC 3585.11 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129113 REDI ERPNESS $69.39 MRSSENGBR SERVICES 129114 REIGN MARINE STUDIES. INC f560.u. OCEAN MONITORING 129115 MCJUNKIN-REFUBLIC SUPFLV $3.423.0/ PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129116 RObINSON FENTILIZLR CU t1.331.79 CHEMICALS 129117 ROSEMUUNT ANALYTICAL 9949.9K INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129118 SAFETY-KLLEN CORF f2A825.58 PARTS CLEANER _ 129219 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $533.40 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129120 SANWA SANK $2.956.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30 129121 DOUG SARVIS 63T5.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING _ 129122 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTO t36.711.53 OCEAN MONITORING H.0.6-30-92 -- 129123 C D WINANT PM 0 31.304.60 OCSUM MONITORING 129124 SLA-BIRD ELECTRONICS INC $1,713.40 LAS SUPPLIES 129126 SENSE■ EYSTLHSLECTRI INC $25$10.600.00 .. INSTRUMENT . _. ._ .. . .. _. 129127 SHARER ELECTRIC f46,066:31 ELECTRIC SERVICES f7l 12912E SILVERS LN SALES _ t6.066.30. . .. LAB WARE SUPPLIES X 12912E SILVERS CHEMICAL ION •412.41 LAB SUPPLIES' S 129130 SIGMA CHEMICAL CY $733.50 LAB SUPPLIES '-' 129131 SILVERY a LE BOUEF S733.50 CONSTRUCTION 7-11-1IC CO 129132 SLIDE WALK-IN MEDICAL CIA S490.00 PRE-ENTATIONNT PHYBICAL'SYAMB' "- - -I 129132 SLIDE MASTER ,430.60 SOIL PRESENTATION AIDS 129]3] SM IT MERE RT GO .. 91$630.00__..__ _ BOILS TESTING n PERMIT FEES 129111 SO COAST AIR TRAINING f692.67 � 1291]5 ]CAYMO UPDATE iRA ININ6 i691.67 TMININO REOISTMTION 129136 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO _. . . .. 5993.40T.60.- .._ PONSR . 12913E SO CAL GAS CO 318 00. - NATURAL GAS 37 129139 THE ERNNE COMPANY f100.6060 DINKELTRAINING REGISTRATION 129140 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO i9$250.17.. SUPPER POOL 129141 STARLING INSTRUMENT CU INC f220.0G 129142 STAMEN Z SP ASSOFF PE f3.220.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 129143 SSPECI ALIZED I PRODUCTS GO 31$432.45_ INSTRUMENT 129113 SPEC TE CM INC 31]2 d9 �- MELDING BUPPLIIB-- 129144 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS S525.00 LAS EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION 129145 SUMMIT STEEL F1.100.26. META' 129146 SUNSET FOND $19.21 TRUCK PARTS-"- 129147 SUPELCO INC $477.55 LAB SUPPLIES 129148 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS $155.10 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129149 TAT NAMEPLATE t ENGRAVING CO $417.65 ENGINEERING-SERVICES 129150 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMFARI 42,229.62 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 129151 TMOMPSb1. INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $335.52. MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 129152 TONY-S LOCK L SAFE SERVICE $154.79 SECURITY SERVICES 129153 70YO LANDSCAPING CO t3.424.14 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.11-13-91 129154 78ANSERA CORD/NTB INTERNATION. 2075.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 129155 TRANSMATION INC 917.55 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129156 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $1.195.46 TRAVEL SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31193 FAGE G REPORT NUMBER AP43 CUUNTI SANITATION DISTRICTS OF DRAN6E COUNTY . . . ... CLAIMS PAID 64/67/93 POSTING DATE OV 01/93 WARRANT NO. VENOUR AMOUNT UESLRIPTION 129157 TRUCK a AUTO SUPPLY INC 31.G60.00 TRUCK PARTS 12915E J6 TUCKER 6 SON INL 34.498.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS _ 129159 TUSTIN DODGE 9253.78 TRUCK PARTS 129160 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $3.360.44 LAS SERVICES - 129161 TYLAN GENERAL 32.592.5E OFFICE SUPPLIES 129162 UHLER, INC $252,734.22 CONSTRUCTION 5-32, 5-33 129163 THE UNISOURCE CORP 3344.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12916E UNITED PARCEL SLKVILL 3522.63 PARCEL SERVICES 129165 UNITED TAPE CORPORATION $63.96 RAFETY VIDEO RENTALS 129166 VWN SCIENTIFIC 31.359.29 LAS SUPPLIES 129167 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 3159.2D PLUNGING SUPPLIES 12916E VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $410.55 LAD SUPPLIER 129169 VERNE'S PLUMBING $1,045.00 PLUI®ING SERVICES I29170 WATER ENVIRONMENT FED. .s16 T.E1 PUBLICATION 129173 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 323.442.58 CAUSTIC"SODA H.O.9-12-92 129172 ROURKE A WOODRUFF 9 OR $13.494.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 "E . CUPISR LLSe R 129173 XEROX CORF 323485.80 LAB SUPPLIES x12917E EORGE YARDLEY CO 996.6E 12917 GEODLE YARDL CO 267.77 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIER 129176 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS $254 05 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 0 2917 RICHARD YOUNG PROD $73:79 OPPICB SUPPLIES 1129119 IE106RAPNICE S36.21 COMPUTER SOFTWARE--------------- a I 10T AI CLAIMS fAlU N/47/93 $3.E L9.9J1.70 SUMMARY AMOUNT RI OPEN FUND .. $427.97 42 OPEN FUND $2,900.21 02 CAP PAC FUND $23,557.11 63 OPEN FUND 617,875.5E 43 CAP FAC FUND 6796.55 45 OPEN FUND $1,194.00 05 CAP FAC FUND $255,721.82 46 OPEN FOND $292.62 47 OPEN FUND $31,142.06 47 CAP FAC FUND $10.772.99. fill OPIR FUND 6461.19 R13 OPER FUND $99.61 014 CAP FAC I'= 639,938.9E 4566 OPER FUND $4,149.52 4566 CAP FAC FUND $24,226.23 RG67 OPUS FUND $2,205.00 F7814 OPER FUND $9,650.54 JT OPEN FUND $956,513.63 CORP $2,O97,962.04 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $0,033.69 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $131,944.79 F .6D9,933.70 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE GA/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129197 AG TECH COMPANY $28,961.79 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.10-6-91 129198 A T S T $4.913.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 129199 ADVANCE SCALE CO $138.00 SCALE REPAIRS 129200 ASSREK0. INC $21,181.72 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT 129201 AIR PRODUCTS S CHEMICAL IN $52,296.00 06M AGREEMENT OZY. GEN. CYST M.0.8-9-89 129202 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 55.868.00 SEWER REPAIRS DIST 7 129203 ANIK7ER - DISTRIBUTION 5106.9E LAB SUPPLIES 129204 ANODYNE INC $3.000.OW ECSA DEPOSIT REFUND 1292D5 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 5753.7E NOTICE 6 ADS 129206 AMSTER SERVICES INC $1.589.89 UNIFORM RENTALS 129207 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1,732.30 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129208 ARMOR - VAC $546.00 STREET SWEEPING 129209 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP 5397.73 ELECTRIC PARTS 129210 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC $300.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE HAULING 129211 ART WORKS 1177.60 FRAMING SERVICES 129212 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. 9130.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 129213 ASSOCIATED DIESEL $606.15 FILTER X 129214 BKK LANDFILL $3.971.28 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 S 129215 SHP CORP. FIRE PROTECTION CO $300.00 PIPE REPAIRS 129216 BRW SAFETY S SUPPLY $1.932.76 SAFETY SUPPLIES bJ 129217 BAKERS SQUARE 0522 5100.00 REPORT) USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 129218 BANANA BLUEPRINT $17,992.86 PRINTING 129219 BANK OF THE WEST $2,937.49 CONSTRUCTION RETSNTIOR 3-23-2 to 129220 B BATEMAN ST02.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1 129221 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 4551.88 BATTERIES 129222 BAUER COMPRESSOR $91.57 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS 229223 BANTER DIAGNOSTICS INC $7.491.77 LAB SUPPLIES 129224 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS 1898.00 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 129225 BELL SECURITY 51.814.75 . _ TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES 129226 BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS. INC. $19.46 LAB SUPPLIER - - - - -- 129227 SOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 4940.20 RADIATOR REPAIRS 129220 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $5.655.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 129229 BRINDERSON CORP $16,210.05 - CONSTRUCTION - PIPS SPOOLS 129230 BUDGET JANITORIAL $1,650.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129231 GARY 6 STALED $9.173.61 PSTTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 129232 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY $427.66 - OFFICE SUPPLIES - - - - 129233 CEPA $1,108.86 LAB SUPPLIES 129234 C.G.I. SYSTEMS 11,208.95 RELAY REPAIR 129235 C M 1 $323.64 -- ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 129236 CRC PRESS INC S388.27 LAB SUPPLIES 129237 CS COMPANY $517.45 GAUOB 12923E CALTROL INC 55.723.7E INSTRUMENTS - -- 129239 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC 1677.03 TRUCK REPAIRS 129240 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE 585.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129241 CALIF. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS $399.39 FITTINGS 129242 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS 579.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 44/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129243 JOHN CAROLED ENGINEERS $8.473.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38 229244 CENTURY SAFETY INST A SUPP 43.832.20 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129245 CHROME CRANKSHAFT INC $370.00 MACMINS SUPPLIES 129246 CHURCH ENGINEERING INC 18.456.17 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-RI 129247 CITY OFFICE FURNITURE INC $412.54 OFFICE FURNITURE _ 129248 CLEVELAND COTTON PROD S134.16 LAB SUPPLIES 129249 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $72.57 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129250 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO $104.84 LAB SUPPLIES 129251 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $5,333.63 HARDWARE 129252 COMPUTER GRAPHICS GROUP $6,675.11 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 129253 COMPUSA, INC. S3,813.26 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 129254 COMPUSERVE s24.20 COMPUTER SERVICES 129255 CONNELL GN PARTS / DIV 117.12 TRUCK PARTS 129256 CON-WAY WESTERN EXPRESS $67.47 FREIGHT 129257 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4,448.25 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 12925E CONSOLIDATED FREIGXTWAVS 51.727.70 FREIGHT 129259 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO $281.46. LAB SUPPLIES X 129260 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 21 340.84 TOOLS REPORT = 129261 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C 66:745.00 129262 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 1422.46 TRUCK PARTS _ bO 129263 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 9488.84 6L6CTRIC SUPPLIES 129264 CYBEREX $523.83 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129265 UNIVERSITY UNION $215.50 TRAINING REGISTRATION CO 129266 DAILY PILOT $515.00 NOTICES 6 ADS 129267 DARES L MDORE 13:651:27 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3 N 12926E J.Y. Dr AIGEL0 CO INC 52 50734 PIPE PARTS 229269 DATA V12 INC $50.00 LAID SUPPLIES 129270 OF ANZA CORPORATION 1150.00 GLASS 129271 DE GUELLE 6 SONS GLASS CO 5941.53 . . 129272 DELPHIN COMPUTER SUPPLY $140.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES - 129273 DENVILLE SCIENTIFIC INC 1101.97 LAB SUPPLIES 129274 OE2URIK AND/OR CS CO $2.022.67 VALVE 129275 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $5,788.61 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.9-12-92 1292T6 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 34.059.12 PRINTING 129277 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP $23.677.63 COMPUTER SOPTWARB 129278 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $905.00 INSTRUNENT 129279 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN 3742.50 TOXIC WASTE REHOVAL 129280 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $7,645.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 129281 ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC $5.400.00 INSURANCE CONSULTANT 129282 DUNN EDWARDS CORP 5491.13 PAINT SUPPLIES 229283 DrVALS SALES 5234.00 FITTINGS 129284 EIMCD PROCESS EQUIP CO 41.874.85 MECHANICAL PARTS 129285 ESP NORTH sB5.G3 ELECTRIC PARTS 129286 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING $375.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES _ 129207 EASTMAN INC 59.306.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129208 ECOANALYSIS INC / 145.480.80 COMPLIANCE DATABASS SYST M.0.1-113-93 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129209 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES $3,703.00 ELECTRICAL SERVICES 129290 EMERGENCY LIFELINE INC 35.326.8E EMERGENCY SUPPLIES 129291 ENCHANTER INC $4,400.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 129292 ENGINEERED COMFORT SYSTEMS 31.067.80 ELECTRIC PART 129293 ENTECH LAB AUTOMATION $9.845.55 LAB SUPPLIES 129294 EIT $1.386.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129295 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC $582.00 LAB SAMPLES 129296 ERSHIGS INC 1286.08 FITTINGS 129297 ESSENCE GROUP 1375.21 COMPUTER PARTS 129299 EXCHANGER WORKS DIV. $1,817.13 MECHANICAL PARTS 129299 MARSHALL FAIRRES 3128.0E DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129300 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5.980.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 129301 CHEMVEST INC 32,317.78 EQUIPMENT 129302 FILTER SUPPLY CO 31.163.47 FILTERS 129303 FIRE MASTER $3,247.27 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129304 FIRST COMPANY 5256.45 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES m 129305 FISCHER 3 PORTER CO $5,273.56 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES X 129306 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 3425.62 LAB SUPPLIES Z 229307 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS 51.074.21 PUMP 129308 CLIFFORD A FORKERT 32,956.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 129309 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 16,329.40 WATER USE -� 129310 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 3739.60 PAINT SUPPLIES by 129311 FREOSON RV SUPPLY 3T 7.40 TRUCK PARTS 129312 FREEDOM IMAGING 3'76.4.8 LAB EQUIPMENT W 129313 BUD FRET 342.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129314 CITY OF FULLERTON $39.00 _ WATER USE 129315 SST. INC. 3107.21 - OFFICE SUPPLIES 129316 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO 1580.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 229317 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $5,004.92 TELEPHONE SERVICES 129318 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC 924,289.01 MECHANICAL-PARTS 129319 GLOBAL ENGINEERING $138.82 LAB SUPPLIES 229320 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 1129.3J CAMERA 129321 GREAT AMERICAN FRINTING SIO.022.63 PRINTING 129322 DON GREEN 3 ASSOCIATES 3520.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-30-92 129323 MSO TECHNOLOGY $1141562,00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2, P2-44 129324 HAANER EQUIPMENT CO $143.97 TRUCE PARTS - -' 129325 HACH COMPANY $206.15 TEST KIT 129326 FRED A HARPER 11.500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129327 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTI A4.578.38 FILTER PARTS - 129328 MAULAWAY CONTAINERS 31.620.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 129329 HAUSER ENGINEERING 31,071.00 LAB SERVICES 129330 PL HAWN CO INC 33.696.85 FILTERS 129331 HELLO $191.05 TELEPHONE SUPPLIES 129332 J.M. HEMP 3 ASSOC 180.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 129333 G. PATRICK HERSHELMAN 4333.18 DEFERRED COMP PAY-OFF 129334 HILTI INC 4495.65 ELECTRIC PARTS 1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE R REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129335 MI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE $2,882.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES 229336 HOERBISER CYS CALIF INC $129.27 COMPRESSOR PARTS 12933T MOVE CONTROLS DIY/HONE, INC. 5138.23 VALVE 129338 HORIZON HIGH REACH t EQUIP 3439.58 TRUCK PARTS 129339 RS HUGHES CO INC 1207.22 MARDWARE 129340 HUNTER CORPORATION S56r074.50 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 129341 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $18.33 WATER USE 129342 HUNT-5 FINAL PHASE 527,035.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE A REPAIRS 129343 IRD MECHANALTSIS $2,146.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129344 ISC 55.616.00 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES 129345 IMPERIAL NEST CHEMICAL $48,499.89 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.I1-16-92 129346 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.191.17 CONNECTORS 129347 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $342.43 TRUCK PARTS 2293/8 PACTEL TELETRAC $4,208.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 129349 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $145.70 WATER USE 129350 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 5275.18 JAHITORIAL SUPPLIES 129351 KAMAN BEARINGS t SUPPLY $26.99 MARUWARE T7l 129352 KEENAN SUPPLY 5221.68 VALVES X 129353 NINE BEARING INC 187.07 HARDWARB S 129354 KNOK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 42,074.89 ELECTRIC PARTS 129355 MARTEN LORDICK TEL S0. $1.$72.30 CELLULAR TELEPHONENSTRUCTION CES 1-9 SERV. AGREEMENT 129357 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO $80.81 CAMERA -{ 129357 LA TR ON IRS 567.07 _ - 12935E LEE t RO CONSULTING EN6R $19.567.07 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-3B-5 W 12935E LINCOLO t STEVENSSTEVE NS ,007,50 C!HADEFETS RRED 129361 LINC LIN NATIONAL LIFE 1N5. CO. $1.005.60 DEFSRRBD COMP DEPOSIT 1293fi1 RP LINOSTROM INC 31r825.00 - CON9VLTING 96RVICEB - ENVIRONMENTAL ' 129362 LOS ANGELES TIMES $162.59 SUBSCRIPTION 129363 MACDONALD-STEPHENS LAB $3,514.00 LAB SERVICES 129364 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC $6.900.23 MECHANICAL PARTS 129365 MANHOLE ADJUSTING $2,269.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING 129366 MARINE t VALVE SUPPLY $437.65 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 129367 MATT - CHLOE INC 51069.13 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 129368 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS S64.75 LAB SUPPLIES 129369 HCKIMLET EQUIPMENT CORP 5937.13 BLECPRIC CART PARTS 129370 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO 5287.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS 229371 MICRO MOTION $727.34 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129372 MIOWAY MFG t MACHINING $3,640.00 FITTINGS 129373 HILLTRONICS $3.860.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS 229374 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES 9134.82 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLIES 129375 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3,038.46 . UNIFORM RENTALS 129376 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO S875.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129377 MLAOEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $58,662.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-30 129378 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.53 WATER USE 129379 NORSLOG ELECTRIC VEHICLES 367.866.34 ELECTRIC CARTS M.O.1-13-93 129380 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE A / $142.00 SUBSCRIPTION FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OESCRIPTION 129382 OR SYSTEMS CO $23.336.30 CHLORINE M.0.30-9-91 129382 ON LINE SOLUTIONS $430.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 129383 OPAMP TECHNICAL BOOKS 582.69 LAB SUPPLIES 129389 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $241.02 TRUCK PARTS 229305 ORANGE VALVE S FITTING CO. $1.670.31 FITTINGS 129386 OR17EX CORP $1,286.02 MACHINE PARTS 129387 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.958.45 SPECIALTY GASES 129308 COUNTY OF ORANGE 19r320.64 SERVICE AGREEMENT - RADIOS 129389 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT i23.896.52 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT 129390 PSC SCIENTIFICS CORPORATION $310.95 LAB SUPPLIES 129391 PSSI $2,121.86 SERRA VIDEO INSPECTION 129392 PACIFIC PARTS 3BO.61 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129393 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $1.069.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129394 PACIFIC BELL S59.1M TELEPHONE SERVICES 129395 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $1,462.66 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 129396 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPP $5,934.67 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129397 PAGENET 972.50 PAGER RENTALS R1 129398 PAR WEST 568.96 PACKING B0XES Z 129399 PARAGON CABLE 136.78 CABLE SERVICES 129400 PARTS UNLIMITED $819.55 TRUCK PARTS 129401 ROT PENDERGRAFT 3460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129402 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $1,241.62 LAB SUPPLIES 129403 PERNA SEAL S861.52 HARDWARE CC 129909 PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS INC 53.611.91 CHEMICALS 129905 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS INC 6156.D83.63 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 12990E PITNEV BRICS S193.30 POSTAGE MACHTNE LEASE 129406 POLY FABRICS 1193.95 PIPS 12990E POLYRORE INC $13 s$68.22 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 129909 POWER ON INDUSTRIES SUPPLY CO 368.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 129910 PRECISION IN DUS TRIOS 14.040.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129412 MIKE PURLICHPROGRAMMER -$ E SONS i19.090.00 C0MPT%uUTER I0N 5-35-2 129413 FROG PROJECTS CONNECTION $79.35 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 129413 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. S}.$93.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 129415 QUES TRON CORP 193.06 LAB COMPUTER SERVICES 129416 RAN COMPUTER SERVICES INC s7.1B7.06 TRASH RE OVRVICE9 12991E RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO $1.162.69 TRASH REMOVAL 129418 RAIN IN INSTRUMENT CO i1.$79.95 LAB SUPPLIES 12911E THE REGISTER 179.95 NOTICES 6 ADS 129919 REISH MARINE STUDIES, INC s1.160.00 OCEAN NONITORINO 129421 REMOTE METER RESETTING SIST $3,586.00 FOOTAGE 129422 HCJUNRESEARCH PEPUBLICRODUCTS SUPPLY S3$929.80 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129423 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CORP ,920.01 LAB 8UPP1288 129423 PEGGY0WINC. {2.920.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129425 PESGT WILCOXIL $5.552.30 CONSTRUCTION COMP DISTRIBUTION 129426 RUSSELLCS CONST. CO. .309.20 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES-33-1 12912E S.S. MECHANICAL i22.309.20 CONSTRUCTION PI-33-1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID C412l/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129427 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS S9T9.59 ELECTRIC PARTS 12992E SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1,928.52 PLIROING SUPPLIES 129429 SANTA BANK $6,510.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30 229430 DOUG SARVIS 5375.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 129431 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT-L $27,676.95 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 129532 SCIENTIFIC ELECTRONICS SERV. $1.294.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129633 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES INC $2.047.25 SPECIALTY GASES 129435 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS INC $334.00 LAB SUPPLIES 129635 SECURITY SPECIALISTS $160.00 SENRITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 129436 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2.039.33 TOOL PARTS 129437 SHURELUCK SALES 57.786.48 FITTINGS 129438 SLIDE MASTER $56.03 SLIDES 129439 SNAP-ON TOOLS COOP 4323.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129440 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $1,260.00 PEMIT FEES T FEES 129441 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $1,690.00 129442 SO CALIF ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 5120.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 129643 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 617.06A.57 POWER FIT 129444 SO CAL GAS CO S15.579.24 NATURAL GAS X 129445 SOUVENIR PHOTO 567207 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES ? 129446 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER f2.342.41 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RBNYALS bJ 129457 STAMEN 2 SPASSOFF PE 56.720.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 129446 UESTALLOY INC $735.91 SLBCTRIC PARTS 129699 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC $597.47 PLUMMING SUPPLIES 129450 SPEX INDUSTRIES INC 326.V2 LAB SUPPLIES 1 129451 SPYGLASS INC :157.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE C7T 129452 SRECO FLEXIBLE 41,203.36 HOSE 129453 SUMMIT STEEL 51.055.61 METAL 129454 SUN ELECTRIC COOP $649.90 TRUCK PARTS 229455 SUPELCO INC 51.152.22 LAD SUPPLIES 129456 SYMANTEC CORP $78.86 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 129457 TEKDRAULICS S674.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129458 TEKTRONIX INC 3684.89 LAB SUPPLIES 129459 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL $346.35 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129460 CHARLES E THOMAS $241.46 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 129461 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $360.91 OIL 6 GREASE 129462 TONY-S LOCK S SAFE SERVICL $347.41 KEYS/LOCKS 129463 TRANSMATION INC $1.281.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129464 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $206.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 229665 TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY INC $142.64 TRUCK PARTS 129466 TRUESOAIL LABS $75.00 LAB SERVICES 129467 JG TUCKER S SON INC 5311.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS 12906E TYLAN GENERAL $3,993.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES 229569 US AUTO GLASS CENTERS $164.57 TRUCK PARTS 129470 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC 5967.00 LAS SUPPLIES 129471 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $788.91 PARCEL SBRVICES 129472 US DEPT OF COMMERCE NTT / 531.50 PUBLICATION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4115193 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 01111,93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129473 VWM SCIENTIFIC $7,031.59 LAB SUPPLIES 129474 VALIN CORPORATION 1061.66 REGULATOR PARTS 129475 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 55.022.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129476 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL 5252.00 MOTOR REPAIRS 129A77 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS 5827.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129478 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMLNTS 51.628.17 LAB SUPPLIES 129479 VERTEX SYSTEMS 31.007.56 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 229480 VILLAGE NURSERIES $375.81 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 129481 CARL WARREN S CO $300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 129482 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT 5290.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129483 VEST COAST ENVIRONMENTAL $2,371.10 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 129464 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 520.302.97 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92 129485 VESTIN ENGINEERING $540.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 129486 ROURKE A WOODRUFF S SPRADLIN $62.676.39 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 129487 XEROX CORP 57.819.29 COPIER LEASES - 129086 GEORGE YARDLEY CO 3445.31 VALVES 129489 RICHARD B EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION rn ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PA10 00/21/93 $1.459.794.11 -i ay SUMMARY AMOUNT V 41 OPER POND $52.51 X2 OPER POND 74,410.05 - - - -' N2 CAP PAC FU FUND $29,699.64 77 ®3 OPER FUND j$2,447.04 X3 CAP FAC FUND $4,125.04 - M5 CAP FUND 16,641.34 90 NS CAP FAC FUND 816,$48.49 A8 OPER FUND 349.24 - - - - - #7 OPER FUND 12,560.84 Nl CAP FAC FUND) 812$924.10 All OPER FUND j$54.88 - - -- - - - 41S OPER FUND 278.95 R14 CAP FAC FUND $$53.64 R5fi6 OPER POND 302.61 R 7fi19 OPER FUND ,705.82 JT OPER FUND CORE $529,701.49 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FU $30,169.91 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL i123123,995995.8989 $1,459,794.12 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728.8127 Telephone:(714) 962.2411 --�I JOINT BOARDS AGENDA JUNE 9, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (18) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing consideration of items 118)Ic) and (d) listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2). (b) Verbal report of Staff (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated June 9, 1993 (Copy attached) (d) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to procure necessary services, equipment and supplies for emergency clean-up and repair of storm damage from rupture of Districts' Air Base Trunk Sewer caused by Corps of Engineers' contractor working on the Santa Ana River Flood Control improvement project, in an amount not to exceed $250,000.00; and authorizing staff and General Counsel to seek recovery of said costs from the responsible parties COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS W ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA June 9, 1993 I OOCA ELLIS AVENUE ✓.B.BOX 0127 FOUNEAM VALLEY.CALIFONNIA 92RBE12) pu19623A11 AUTHORIZATION FOR EMERGENCY STORM DAMAGE CLEANUP AND REPAIRS AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 CAUSED BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS' SANTA ANA RIVER PROJECT Early Sunday Morning, June 6, Operations Division staff discovered excess water and sand entering the Reclamation Plant No. 1 barscreen and grit chambers. Operations, maintenance and engineering staffs tracked the source of the water to the Santa Ana River, where a contractor employed by the U.S. Corps of Engineers had removed portions of an abandoned, but still connected, pipe line, allowing water from the unusually heavy rains of Saturday's storm to enter the plant. The freak storm inundated not only the Districts' trunk sewer, but all of the contractor's operation within the Santa Ana River. Complete abandonment of this old river crossing was part of the Corps flood control project. They were to have made a plug and were requested by our staff to notify us one week ahead of the planned work activity on the line. None of that occurred. The contractor removed several sections of the pipe, which contains no sewage. Staff quickly mobilized the Corps contractor and built a sand berm around the opening. At the same time, a concrete plug was poured in the line to prevent further entry of sand. The Districts many fail-safe systems worked and no sewage was spilled. The large cleanup task has been started and the total extent of this work is not yet known. Up to six feet of sand has filled the Plant No. 1 headworks. Tomorrow night, when flows are lowest, Operations will pump down the headworks to try to determine the extent of the deposits. Sewage and sand were also diverted to Plant No. 2 after the Plant No. 1 barscreen were damaged by the high sand and rock deposits. The extent of the cleanup necessary on the four-mile interplant line is also not yet known. As of this writing the plant is back to normal operating procedures and cleanup is in progress. Staff estimates that to date outside vendors costs are about $25,000, plus the considerable charges for staff work. Because the extent of the damage or the cleanup is not known, estimates of the costs are very preliminary. The recommended action is to authorize the General Manager to procure services, equipment and supplies necessary to effect the emergency cleanup and repair in an amount not to exceed $250,000. Staff believes that the Corps of Engineers and/or it's contractor is responsible for all costs and recovery should be made. Staff is, therefore, further recommending that authorization be granted to seek recovery of the cleanup and repair costs from the responsible parties. �� wpd«\eBpLp14NBOBB3 GREAT LAKES, COASTAL AND MARINE WATERS: QUANTIFYING ECOSYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS AND CHARTING A COURSE FOR THE FUTURE G INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT RESULTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Pacific Ocean . Califomia A Cooperative Project of aMSa association of SWEPA Metropolitan ... Sewerage United sates office of wetlands, agencies EnW-nmental Protection Oceans,and Watersheds Agency INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT RESULTS IN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Pacific Ocean • California MEASURABLE BENEFITS SHOW concentrations), with accompanying IMPROVING TRENDS IN improvements in fish survival in toxicity KEY INDICATORS tests. Reductions in metals concentrations in marine sediment have As a result of the County Sanitation also occurred. Districts of Orange County (Districts) Industrial Pretreatment Program, Changes in sediment quality are most significant ecosystem improvements have noticeable at the outfall diffuser station been achieved. In Orange County, (located at the boundary of the zone of California, almost 1,000 industries are initial dilution) 60 meters away from the regulated as part a 1984 federally outfall. This area is the most heavily approved industrial pretreatment impacted marine monitoring station program. Some 400 of these industries sampled. Improvements in the diversity are considered to be "significant (number of species) of benthic industrial users" as defined by the U.S. invertebrates living in the sediments near Environmental Protection Agency. the ocean outfall diffuser are evident in long-term trends. The diversity of Despite a 45-percent increase in flow organisms found at the outfall is also (from 180 to 262 million gallons a day) higher, than at a control site. between 1977 and 1991, the Districts were able to achieve dramatic reductions Abundance (number of organisms) is in influent and effluent total metals (71 also much higher at the outfall than at percent and 82 percent respectively). the reference station approximately five The discharge of conventional miles away. This is a sign of a healthy parameters (biochemical oxygen demand ecosystem and indicates the benefits of and total suspended solids) were reduced the non-toxic nutrient source which takes about 50 percent during this same time the place of former riverine flows (now frame and have been fairly constant for dammed and regulated) which once the past five years, while the metals have nourished this marine environment. continued to decrease. INFLUENT LOADING OF METALS Reductions in metals and other organic REDUCED OVER 50 PERCENT and inorganic toxics have been so effective that, since 1989, the influent To date, 95 percent of all the metal heavy metals have met the Districts' finishers and other federally regulated National Pollutant Discharge industries have installed flow restrictors Elimination System (NPDES) discharge or control valves to reduce their water standards without benefit of treatment. usage, or have installed basic-waste minimization equipment to reduce the Since the program's approval in 1983, volume of hazardous wastes and source control efforts have continued to wastewater discharged to the sewerage reduce effluent metals loadings (and system. This has resulted in a reduction EPA &"SA: Quantifying Ecosystem /mpro emenu 2 in wastewater flows of 50 percent. Total to less than 100. Enforcement actions to influent loadings of heavy metals to the bring these remaining dischargers into treatment facilities were reduced by 71 compliance are continuing. percent between 1977 and 1991 -- from 1900 pounds per day to about 900 as a Overall, the rate of compliance has result of pretreatment program efforts. steadily increased. The ratio of Recent reductions in flow and loadings compliance to non-compliance for all the can be attributed in part to California's samples collected for Class I permittees extended drought and a decline in has improved 34 percent since 1985 and manufacturing due to the recession. in direct proportion to the metals However, the long-term reductions in reductions achieved. Similarly, non- influent loadings can be related to the compliance fees have dropped as more installation of pretreatment equipment dischargers have come into compliance. and better housekeeping practices. There have also been subtle changes in Reductions in the permitted metals the mechanisms employed, such as the allowances for Class I permittees (those use of probation orders. Last-resort civil discharging more than 25,000 gallons per and criminal enforcement actions, while day)-have been reduced 72 percent, from few in number, have resulted in about 2000 pounds per day to 500. significant settlement fees which serve as Achieving these reductions has required a strong deterrent to chronic non- ... a four-fold increase in budget, a 150 compliance. percent increase in staff labor, and a doubling in the number of samples and POLLUTION PREVENTION laboratory analyses conducted as part of INITIATIVES INCLUDED on-site and downstream inspection and enforcement activities. During this same The Districts' pretreatment program is period, the number of permittees has constantly being refined to meet remained fairly constant at about 1,000. increasingly stringent environmental protection criteria to protect land, air ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS DECLINE and water resources. Most recently, the Pretreatment Program was electively During the Program's eight-year history, expanded to include a Pollution the number of companies on the Prevention Program designed to reduce annually published list of non-complying the quantity of toxic material discharged companies has dropped from 93 to 34, by industrial users of the Districts' and was as low as 10 in 1990. A recent wastewater facilities. The program change in how such determinations are elements include: made has increased the number, but the severity of violations has dramatically • the adoption of an ordinate that decreased. establishes waste minimization requirements, The amount of metals discharged in . the application of mass emission rates ..J excess of permit allowances has been and concentration limits, reduced from about 1100 pounds per day EPA&"SA: Quantifying Ecosystem Improvements } 3 the installation of flow restrictors, incentives in the form of lower pretreatment and sewer-use charges and • the promotion water conservation, and volume reductions in generated waste. • the application of waste minimization techniques as part of enforcement Preparation of Waste Minimization settlements and compliance actions. Plans Mandated In September 1989, as part of the Pioneering Waste Minimization Program revisions to the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations, additional In 1984, the Districts implemented a provisions were incorporated that waste minimization policy to reduce the established waste minimization quantity of toxic materials discharged by requirements. These provisions require industrial users. Mass emission rates all users to provide waste minimization were promulgated for each permitted plans to conserve water, investigate discharger, with compliance based on the products substitution, provide inventory results of samples collected at each control, implement educational activities, discharger's facility and average water and take any other steps needed to usage (concentration limits were also minimize waste. This policy was in included as of 1991). Permittees are keeping with EPA's January 1989 required to install flow restrictors or Pollution Prevention Policy Statement control valves to assure wastewater which calls for state and local .. reduction and to prevent the company governments to play a primary role in from achieving compliance through encouraging the implementation of waste dilution. As part of their annual minimization and environmentally sound inspection, permittees' facilities are recycling practices. checked for water conservation control equipment. With California's extended ENFORCEMENT EMPHASIS ON drought and economic recession, ABATEMENT VIA POLLUTION manufacturing flows have been reduced PREVENTION even more. Additional flow reductions will be harder to achieve, but are The Districts have also adopted a two- encouraged. tiered approach to improve industrial pollution prevention practices. Under Working Closely With Industry tier one, waste minimization Brings Results requirements are incorporated into enforcement actions, requiring non- Additionally, through permitting and compliant industries to conduct and enforcement activities, the Districts report waste minimization assessments. promoted good housekeeping practices and installation of waste minimization Descriptions of proven waste equipment. This included the minimization techniques, their implementation of waste segregation and applications and benefits, and a checklist the installation of dragouts tanks, spray are provided for their use. The Districts' rinses, and flow restrictors. As a result, engineers are then sent to each non- these practices created economic compliant industry to review EPA&"SA:Quantifying Ecosystem Improvements 4 �./ manufacturing processes, assess waste Technical Assistance and minimization opportunities, and answer Education Outreach Critical any questions about the checklist and the Districts' requirements. Each industry As part of the Districts' technical must complete the checklist, and outreach efforts for the industrial implement those techniques that are community, they conduct workshops in found to be technically and economically cooperation with the University of feasible. California on "Industrial Wastewater Treatment and Waste Reduction' and Expanding Environmental "Switching From Solvents to Water- Protection Programs Based Cleaning Processes." Staff also routinely meet with industry trade Through the second tier of the program, associations to discuss waste scheduled for implementation in 1993, minimization requirements and to the Districts will begin wide-spread promote waste reduction. pollution prevention programs, that include cross-media and non-industrial ORANGE COUNTY EFFORTS pollution prevention options for all YIELD NATIONAL AWARD dischargers. The first step will consist of an extensive source survey of small In 1992, the Districts' program received industries and commercial dischargers, an EPA Administrator's Pollution the results of which will be used to Prevention Award. The only publicly `./ prioritize implementation efforts. In owned treatment works receiving the addition, tools such as alternative 1992 award, Orange County was enforcement mechanisms, permit recognized for its innovative and assessments, and pollution prevention aggressive program implementation and incentives will be developed to its commitment to environmental encourage implementation. improvement. The Districts will promote their program through coordination with other The County Sanitation Districts of agencies, cooperation with the industrial Orange County is a government agency community, and public outreach. As that serves the wastewater treatment part of the program, a series of technical needs of over two million people in 23 and educational workshops will be held cities and unincorporated areas of and "ad-hoc" committees will be Orange County in southern California by established. collecting and treating over 225'million gallons per day of residential, The Districts are also considering commercial and industrial wastewater at developing a Creative Solutions two regional wastewater treatment plants Partnership Program to develop I that discharge to the ocean. incentives for cross-media pollution controls and reductions. EPA &AMSA: Quantifying Ecosystem Improvements REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN 6-09-93 1 ) Central Power Generation Dedication As indicated on your meeting notice for tonight, we will be conducting the Central Power Generation Dedication Ceremony at Plant No. 1 on Wednesday, June 30th, at 4:30 p.m. We will also be conducting plant tours, both before and after the dedication, for those that are interested. Invitations will be mailed Friday to you and your �— colleagues on your respective councils and boards, as well as other invitees. We're all looking forward to officially dedicating this milestone project that will reduce air emissions, save our rate payers between $8-10 million annually when fully operational, and provide us with added system reliability. -Item 2 on Next Page- 1 2) GENERAL MANAGER ELECTED TO HEAD AMSA. `.. I am pleased to report that at the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies' annual meeting in Baltimore last month our General Manager, Wayne Sylvester, was elected to a second term as President. AMSA represents the nation's largest sewerage agencies at the federal level. A national office and staff is maintained in Washington, DC. AMSA works with Congress and the regulatory agencies on wastewater management issues and is quite well thought of, both in the halls of Congress, and EPA. -Item 3 on Next Page- a 3) Upcoming Meetings A. Districts 1 & 7 Selection Committee - The Districts'! & 7 Selection Committee is scheduled to meet on Friday. June 18th. at 7:30 a.m. B. Joint Works Selection Committee - The Joint Works Selection Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, June 23rd, at 4:30 p.m. , (immediately preceding the Executive Committee meeting). C. Executive Committee Meetina - The Executive Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday. June 23rd , at 5 :30 p.m. Invite two of the following Directors to attend and participate in the discussions: Victor Leipzig and Thomas Lutz -or- Ted Moreno or Carrey Nelson D. Enciineerino and Construction Committee - The Engineering and Construction Committee is scheduled to meet on Tuesday, June 29th, at 4:30 p.m. `, - Item 3 Continued on Next Page - E. Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers - The Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers is scheduled to meet on Tuesday. June 29th. at 6:00 p.m. F. Central Power Generation Facility Dedication at Plant No. 1 - And, once again, the Dedication ceremony for the Central Power Generation Facility is scheduled to be held on Wednesday. June 30th. at 4:30 p.m., at Plant No. 1 . - End of Report - wpdo c\gm\jcrpts 93\jc06.01 v Award Presented to Diceon Electronics, Inc. Joint Chairman Mahoney u ■ Tonight we would also like to recognize Diceon's achievements. ■ Diceon, a District No. 7 permittee located in Irvine, manufactures multi-layer printed circuit boards for computer and telecommunications industries. Diceon employs 382 people. ■ Over the past several years, Diceon has excelled in many areas including: ■ Pollution prevention research and development that has resulted in significant reductions in the use of hazardous materials and the generation of hazardous waste, and in significant improvements in water conservation. ■ Environmental compliance. ■ Management commitment and support. ■ Staff training, communications and teamwork. ■ Community service, one example of which is providing the City of Irvine with the opportunity to conduct emergency response training in Diceon's facility. ■ Clearly, Diceon has become a model industrial discharger and sets a fine example for others to emulate. ■ In recognition of these achievements, it is with great pleasure that I present this plaque to Diceon on behalf of the Boards of Directors and staff, recognizing their significant efforts and contributions towards clean water. ■ Representing Diceon tonight are the following individuals: ■ Marl Murray, General Manager of the Irvine Business Unit; ■ Sue Chrismer, Environmental Manager of the Irvine Business Unit; and .J ■ Jim Ryan, Corporate Director of Environmental Affairs. Ji...MLLORIPRESENM 06 OSARD " AMSA - EPA Success Stories M. Nellor `.. ■ As you came in tonight, you may have noticed a poster display in the lobby. ■ The poster is one product of a $200,000 cooperative project sponsored by the Environmental Protection Agency and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies that has collected information which demonstrates the relationship between successful wastewater management practices and treatment technologies, and documented environmental benefits in the nation's waters. ■ As part of the agreement, educational materials and information are being produced for technology transfer. The poster is a mobile unit which has been used at national conferences, and next week will be at EPA's National Pretreatment Coordinators Conference in Annapolis. ■ The Districts were used as one of the Clean Water Act success stories because of the effectiveness of our Source Control program in achieving ecosystem improvements through significant reductions in industrial discharges of heavy metals, BOD and TSS. ■ These reductions are the results of the Districts' industrial permitting, inspection, monitoring and enforcement efforts, and our policy of promoting pollution prevention. ■ Almost 95% of the Districts' federally regulated industries have installed equipment to reduce water usage, have installed waste minimization equipment, or have implemented waste minimization practices as part of their operations. ■ One of our outstanding industries is here tonight, Diceon Electronics, Inc.; and in recognition of these achievements, Diceon has already received a prestigious award presented by the California Water Pollution Control Association which recognizes industries for achievements in waste minimization and/or pollution prevention; application and/or development of innovative solutions or technological advances; consistent compliance with discharge standards; and participation in community service programs which develop public awareness of environmental protection. [transfer program to Mr. Mahoney] J:\..MLLONPRESEM93 06 09.BR0 MEETING DATE June 9, 1993 TIME 7 :30 p.m. DIB=Cn 1,2,3,5,6.7, 11. 13 S 14 DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS ILUTZI ....... DICHADp80N ... ISEYERI .. ....... MMERA ..... L/ _ ISEYER) ...... SARRENA ...... IDENES) BELL . . — IREADEI ...... FEMVMAN .... (DENESNAHANI .... GILW .... IPONTUUSI.... META U .... ISCOTTI .. ... COLLINS ... _ (STEINERI ..... SiWMIr..... IDESAY) ............. COX ...... ISANSONE) ....... DEBAY....... . DISTRICTS INELSONI ........ OUNLAP...... ISCOTT ...... COLLINS ...... ,/ (RICE) .. .. ....,.. EVANG....... IGULLI%SONI ... AA .....,. IREAOEI . .. . .... FEDRYfMN .,. IBEYERI ..... BARREN ...... (MAHONEYI....... FLORA ....... — ICOMES) ...... BELL . ........ IBROWN)......... GRIFFIN ...... IFLOMI .I..... CATLIN ....... ./ IWEDAA) ........ OULLU(BON ... — IFLORAI ...... MAMONEY ... JJ�7Gyr (WEDAA ......... HAMMOND _.. IECKENRI .. .. MORENO.MAflM (COX) . ... ....... HART........ _ MARKERI ..... NELSON ....... IAOEI ...... ..... FERRY ....... IDALV) ....... RCKIER ......• (FORSY7HEISILVAI ... ...... LAZSLOUIRDS ...... —_ ILUTZI .......AILISb ....... (RICHAI DSON) .... LUTEIG ...... ISTEINERI ..... ZUKE . ... IRIOFUU .. .. .... WH . . ...... _ ISINGFRI ...... 2lAKEf ....... IFLOtW .. ....... MINER . .... _ ILINN) ........... MINER ... .... DISTRICT 3 IECKENRODq ..... MOIIENO,MARM i� (MARTNEZI.... SAPIEN ....... (PULIDO) ......... MORENO,TED . _ ZLSONI ..... DUNLAP....... JZ (PARKERI ........ NELSON ...... CLANAHANI . CABIN ..... MUNLAR . ....... PARKER . ..... ISCOTTI . . . . . . COLLINS ...... IDALV) .......... NCIEII K ...... AL, IRICEI ..... ... EVENS........ IRICKETT .... PONTOUS .,, _ IMAHONEVI . .. . FLORA ........ ISALTARELLS ..... MICKETT ..... : _ (MOM)...... GRIFFIN ....... ILUTD .......... FISHING ...... _ (AGE) ........ FERRY ........ (LUTZ) .......... RICHARDSON .. IFORSVRIEI ... LASZLO ....... (DEBAY)U......... SANSONEU .:: - (FORSNROSON) . LUTZ ......... IOESAYI ......... BANSONE .. (UNNI .. . .. . .. MINER ........ IM PITINE21....... SAMEN ..... IDALVI ..... .. PICKIER ....... AV IROSRAILLEI ...... SILVA ...... _ IROBITAILLEI ... SILVA GLAKETI .....,. SINGER ..... GIAKETI .... SINGER .. .. ISTEINERI ....... eMWPON ISTEINER) ... . STMIeNI ... (STANTON) ....... STEINER...... ISATE51 .... .. SYLVIA . . ... .. (MILLER) .... ..... SWAN . ...... — ISATES) .... ..... SYLVIA ...... DISTRICT B %RRYISCHEAFERI . WAHNER .... \ IGULLMSONI .. . ... WEDAA ...... IDEBAY) .. .. . . O% ....... IpOBDAILLEI ...... WINCHELL .... C IDEBAYI ...... SANSONE ..... (STANTON) .... STEINER....... IS INGERI ......... ZLAKFT ...... DISTRICT S STAFF OTHERS (COALL. ...... HART......... ANDERSO .. DENIMANWA ... ISTANTONI . . . . STEINFA....... CLAWS N . JG FUMING.M . ... CAMS .... ER DISTRICT 7 GOIN=C .. HOUGH. ISALTAPEW) .. RICKETY ...... OOSENSTA . HOUGH.... ISCHEAFERI ... WAHNER ...... HASENSTAB HOWAflO .. JG IBEVERI ... BAflREM ...... HODGES ... HUNT ..... ISANSONEA . ... DESAY . ....... KYIE • .••. KNOW .... (WARD) . . . . .. HAMMOND LINGER .... LEE ...... WARD) . . . . .. MORENO.TED .. N CHOR ... LINOSTROM ISTANTONI . . . . STEINEp....... NICNOLB... LYNCH . ... — OOTEN .... MAW .... DISTRICT 11 SIMPSON STONE .... IROBITAILM) . .. WINCHELL ..... OFF f STREED ... WASON . .. ISILVA) ....... LEIPZIG VINCENT... � YOUNG... . _ ISTEINERI ..... VZAIT ... 1(WI{IIN/SO�R ... DISTRICT 13 (BEYER) ..... OULLI%SON ... ✓ IBEYERI .... BARRERA (DALY) . . .... PARKER :STANTON)ALVI .. ..... STEIMCKLER ....... —_ /y►TT/N�'IO/i,C /L{'iVA-/r/i_/�A_/_fll) I .... STEINED....... DISTRICT 14 /A4Z , :MILLER( ...... SWAN ........ _✓ __ Y A ..... HARDER �ry''.�. WARD) ... HAMMON......D .... v ` OLI02 _— STANTON) WARD) . .... 9TEINED....... SI11193 • 6/09/93 JOINT BOARD MEETING #5 - PUBLIC COMMENTS OF ED LONG. MUDGE ROSE ED LONG: Good evening. Thank you for the opportunity to speak to the Joint Boards. My name is Ed Long and I am with Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander Ferdon. I have been with you for about seven years serving as the Districts bond counsel under ---- financing starting in 1986. We have served the Districts most recently in the 1992 Refunding transaction which was the SWAP based refunding transaction that was completed in December. In that transaction Mudge Rose (as we have in the past) entered into a contract with the Districts. The contract (as our contracts in the past) provided for a --- limit with the provision that said that if there was additional work due to circumstances beyond our control, we could seek an adjustment to the fee limit. The transaction that's evolved with when we signed the contract was on the basis of a understanding that the transaction would be very similar to a prior matter that we had handled for another client. On that basis, we signed a contract where we agreed to an amount based upon an estimate that we would spend 550 hours on the matter. Because of circumstances arising in the transaction beyond our control, to close the transaction we ended up spending approximately 1400 hours or approximately 2 112 times the amount of effort that was anticipated when the contract was entered into. In the process of the transaction we mentioned to staff, discussed with staff the fact that we were going over where we thought the contemplated services were; that these were circumstances as the staff knew were changes to the structure. These were circumstances that were not within our control and we would be requesting an adjustment. We have since then requested the adjustment. We have spent a fair amount of time with staff, Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee. Out of that process at your board meeting last time, a recommendation came to the Board to give us an adjustment, not for the full amount of the value of the services rendered but for a portion of it. At that Board meeting I was not in attendance. I certainly regret that because at that Board meeting there was some amount of discussion of the matter which I feel that I could have contributed to. At that Board meeting it was determined that no adjustment would be rendered. I am here this evening (I wrote a letter to Mr. Mahoney) requesting a chance to discuss this further. We have had quite a bit of discussion. I think there is a responsibility on my part on any arrangement to be reasonable in dealing with clients. I think there is a responsibility on the client to be reasonable. I think to be honest if I were to come in here and suggest that we get paid every nickel of the value of the services we rendered, no one would say that was reasonable. I think the other extreme is similarly not reasonable. I guess I would like to request further discussion in this matter to give the Joint Boards an opportunity to clarify -1- any questions they have on the subject. I would like to respectfully request reconsideration. I'm not sure what the rules are on this type of process. I think I am running out of time so I guess that is where I am. \..i JC: Thank you Ed. I've been advised by our Counsel that the way to approach this is, do any of the Directors have questions of Mr. Long? Now would be the time to ask them. As for as discussion, we will do that later between the Joint Boards. Is there anyone in the audience that has any questions for Ed regarding this matter? If so, please raise your hand. DIRECTOR ZLAKET: Was staff notified ----- of the overages? Were they made aware of the overages as they were occurring? ED LONG: We reached the agreed upon amounts in reconstructing the numbers probably in the third week of October. In the first week of November I advised the staff that we were going over. In retrospect I wish that I had advised the staff sooner. After the first of November in this transaction we spent more than half of the time on the deal. It was in the midst of the very heaviest part of the transaction it became clear that things were not going as planned; that circumstances had changed; that the other parties of the transaction were changing the deal. They were not coming up with the deal that had been promised and we then had to proceed over basically the next month to get the deal back to what the Districts had anticipated. The Districts, through the staff, were made clearly aware the beginning of November that we were going over. The transaction closed at the beginning of December. DIRECTOR NELSON: I would like to ----- 550 hours -------- 1400 hours. Perhaps the previous comments you just made would cover some of that. ------- more detail. How could you go over 1400 hours? Tell us what you did in those 1400 hours. ED LONG: I can't actually show you in writing exactly what we did for every tenth of those but in terms of summarizing it, I would like explain. It's not 1400 hours over. We did an additional 850 hours so it is 2 1/2 times the 550 so it is not quite as bad as 1400 over. What we did was... I look at this kind of like a carpenter who starts out with a responsibility to build a house for someone and they say I want you to build me that house. Don't worry, it's all designed and we have it all prefabricated and the pieces are going to show up and you put it together and finish it off. I believe that to some extent that is exactly what our assignment was in this transaction. What happened was that those parts did not show up like the Districts contemplated them. The other parties in the transaction brought in a different foundation, they brought in different rules to the transaction. As an example, the main party of the transaction was an American international group which is the SWAP provider that makes the transaction work. We had done the prior transaction with them, knew what the basic SWAP agreement was suppose to be, they said yes based upon the prior SWAP agreement. The agreement that came in was something that was no where close to the prior SWAP agreement in terms of -2- financial terms of the Districts, the advantages to the Districts, the disadvantages to the Districts. We spent a huge amount of time working with them to get that back to what the Districts deal was. The most significant part of that was that a transaction like this has some risks for the Districts. More risks than the typical fixed rate borrowing. Accordingly, the Districts wanted an out. We wanted to be `./ able to get out of the deal rather than be stuck with it forever. This transaction as presented to the Districts had no outs. You couldn't get out of them. We literally spent 200 hours alone arguing with various parties about the ability of the Districts to get out of the deal and to protect itself. I realize your time is short. There are other examples if you wish. DIRECTOR WEDAA: In the boiler-plate of our contract ----- is there any requirement to notify the Districts in writing --------? ED LONG: The requirement is that we will notify the Districts. It does not say we require that it be done in writing. I believe notifying the Districts in person meets that requirement. DIRECTOR WEDAA: Is that ------- from legal or attorney's point of view -------? ---- ED LONG: In the circumstances which I was dealing with the employees of the Districts who were responsible for the transaction who have a major ---------- responsibility for the Districts. I think it would be very inappropriate for me to stop by and tell the Receptionist. I didn't do that; I was with the people who were working on the deal, we discussed it. It was very clear where it stood. We tried to get the deal done and we could spend time writing a letter and in retrospect a.i maybe that would have helped but at the time it was made clear. There was no question the Districts were notified. DIRECTOR SINGER: At the time that you noticed staff, where were you hourly? ED LONG: I would estimate that (it was in the first week of November) we were $20,000 over, 100 hours over the 550. We were over already. We were late notifying the Districts, there is no question. I can see that. We should have done it earlier. DIRECTOR GRIFFIN: Would you kindly refresh the Boards in regard to the previous comment you made with regard to status of your organizations accounting systems through the year of 1992. Were in fact each hour -----? Was your accounting system in place, were you tracking hours, did you know where the hours were and how they were accumulating in these charges? ED LONG: I don't have the transcript from before. I think I can state what the facts are. I hope this is what I said before. I believe it would be. Our accounting system like any consulting firm and our charging system is based on each individual timekeeper daily keeping track of their time and submitting it to the accounting system. You write down what you did, how many tenths of an hour you did it. Our accounting system is where the individual submits the time to their u -3- Secretary. It is put into the computer. At the end of the week it is collected and it goes into the big accounting system. As a result of time entered, there is about a two to three week lag from the time the individual is expended until the time it comes out of the system where I can get a report on it. Sometime it is faster, two to three weeks is not uncommon. When I am looking at it I probably am two weeks behind. Basically what I am relying on is to being up to date and how busy have we been in the past two weeks. It is not an exact science. DIRECTOR GRIFFIN: Would your organization have any problems with your tracking in the accounting system? ED LONG: We may have had a problem. I don't recall what I've said before. It's been some time since we discussed this. Our system may have had some delays. It is a computer system. I'd like to get back that the time was expended. The accounting system may have caused me to be a little later than I wished to be to notify the Districts. Perhaps if it was immediately up to date on the third week of October as opposed to the first week of November, I would have understood that we were at the limit. JC: Any other questions? We will have discussion on this matter later. ED LONG: Could I have one more minute? I recognize that there is some real concern here and you folks have some real responsibility for managing the dollars of the Districts. It has always been a very reasonable relationship. I would very much like to maintain that. I would certainly offer with your agreement to send this issue to a disinterested third party. I would pay the expenses of that and have them come up with what they think is reasonable. If they say what is reasonable, �./ you shouldn't get anything, that is perfectly fine with us and we will pay for that. JC: Thank you Ed. That concludes the public comments portion of the agenda. We will move on to reports. #Ya- JOINT CHAIRMAN REPORT JC: The report of the JC this evening is that Central Power Generation Dedication. We are going to get that thing moving. As we talked about before we are conducting the Central Power Generation Dedication however we changed the date for what we said before. It will be at Plant No. 1 on Wednesday, June 30th, at 4:30 p.m. We will also be conducting plant tours. Those tours are going to be both before and after the dedication so if you haven't had a chance to go through the facility it would be a great time to do it. We are looking forward to officially dedicating the milestone project. As you know, projections are we are going to save approximately $8-10 million annually in power purchases which is certainly going to keep the rates down to our constituents that we serve. -4- I am pleased to report that the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies' annual meeting in Baltimore last month our General Manager was again appointed as the President of that organization. Let us have a round of applause for Wayne. AMSA represents the nation's largest sewerage agencies at the federal level and has a national office and staff that is maintained in Washington, DC. AMSA works with Congress and the regulatory agencies on wastewater management issues and is quite well thought of, both in the halls of Congress, and EPA. I think we are very fortunate to have Wayne in that position and certainly as our General Manager. Upcoming meetings District 1 & 7 Selection Committee will be held on Friday, June 18th, at 7:30 a.m. Joint Works Selection Committee is schedule to meet on Wednesday, June 23rd, at 4:30 p.m, immediate preceding the Executive Committee meeting. The Executive Committee meeting is schedule for Wednesday, June 23rd, at 5:30 p.m. I'd like to invite Victor Leipzig and Thomas Lutz. How about Ted Moreno? (Director Leipzig won't be able to attend.) The Engineering and Construction Committee is to meet on Tuesday, June 29th, at 4:30 p.m. The Special Joint Works Selection Committee on Computers is to meet on June 29th, at 6:00 p.m. The Central Power Generation facility dedication is on Wednesday, June 30th, at 4:30 p.m., at Plant No. 1 . #71b - GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT JWS: I would like to just follow-up on some of the AMSA activities. As the Joint Chairman mentioned, AMSA has an excellent reputation in Washington, both on the hill, and EPA as a prominent player in water quality issues at the national level. As a matter of fact, I just got back from two days in Washington. AMSA was ask by Martha Prowthrow (7) who is the acting Assistant Administrator for water, pending an appointment by President Clinton. The EPA ask us to arrange a meeting of local officials to meet with Bill Leary who is the Counsel for the Senate Sub-Committee on clean water fisheries and wildlife. Mr. Leary is a key member of Senator Bob Graham's committee staff from Florida. The Senate is in the process of writing the Clean Water Act Amendment for renewal of the Clean Water Act as I mentioned in a memo that I sent last week. This issue is up for renewal and they expect to begin holding hearings next week. They plan to release a discussion draft of their proposed amendments to the Clean Water Act this coming Friday and they were seeking our input on this amendment. -5- The House has taken the opposite tact. They actually held their hearings earlier this year and they are now beginning to draft a bill based upon the outcome of those hearings so the Senate and the House have taken two different tacts on how they are going to approach the renewal of the act. Besides my participation in AMSA, Blake Anderson, our Director of Technical Services and Margie Nellor, our Source Control Manager are also active. What this really means is that Orange County is playing a major role and is at the table as national priorities for clean water, and decisions are made. I think that is real important for us because we consider a major part of our role in doing it to bring some reason and judgement to the process to hopefully have laws and regulations written on the basis of scientific evidence and fact rather than hysteria and political reasons. Blake shares the watershed management committee of AMSA and I sent you last week a proposal that they drafted to incorporate comprehensive watershed management into the Clean Water Act for the first time. The memo that I sent you summarizes the reasons for that. Margie Nellor is the Vice Chair of the AMSA Pretreatment Committee. You may have noticed as you came in the lobby this evening there is a display out there, a display put together by AMSA and EPA on a study done on pretreatment and we were one of the case studies. I'd like to ask Margie Nellor, our Source Control Manager to discuss that briefly with you and relate it to our pretreatment program. MARGIE NELLOR: It is a pleasure to be here tonight to have some good news to share with you because every time I'm here it is always bad news; something terrible has happened or we're going after an industry. �..i The poster in the lobby is a product of a cooperative study between the EPA and AMSA. It is a $200,000 effort which is collecting information which demonstrates the relationship between successful wastewater management programs and technologies, and improvements in the nation's waters. Part of the project is to put together with educational information and materials for technology transfer and so the poster in the lobby is just one product of that. I believe in addition you have something in your packages tonight which describes the poster in a little more detail. The poster itself is a mobile poster; it goes around the country. It has gone to a couple conferences. Next week it goes to an EPA National Pretreatment Coordinators Conference in Annapolis, Maryland. We are highlighted on the poster as one of the success stories based on our Source Control program in its significant reductions in industrial discharges which have resulted in improvements in our coastal waters. We have achieved those reductions through our industrial permitting, monitoring and enforcement inspection program and our policy of promoting pollution prevention. At this current time about 95% of our federally regulated industries have implemented some type of pollution prevention. They have either put in equipment to reduce water usage, implemented equipment that reduces the use of hazardous materials or the generation of hazardous waste or they have changed their -6- operational procedures to do those same things. We haven't been able to achieve these reductions without the cooperation of our industries. The other good part of the news that I wanted to share with you is that we have with us tonight one of our most exceptional industries. We have with us Diceon Electronics, Inc. who has previously received a prestigious award from the California Water Pollution Control Association which I have with me tonight. This particular award is given to outstanding industries who have demonstrated excellence in a number of areas including pollution prevention, environmental compliance and participating in community projects. We have something that we would like to share with them as well tonight, so with that I would like to turn the program back over to the Joint Chairman. JC: Thank you, Margie. Buck, do you have a question? DIRECTOR CATLIN: To supplement that the Water Research Institute of which Peer Swan is Vice Chairman, recognition -------- and advisory board ------, it's one of the best research institutes in the United States ----------. JC: Thank you, Buck. Tonight I would like to tell you a little bit about Diceon's achievements. It is a District No. 7 permittee located in Irvine, manufactures multi-layer printed circuit boards for computer and telecommunications industries and employs approximately 382 employees. Over the past several years, Diceon has excelled in many areas including: - Pollution prevention research and development that has resulted in significant reductions in the use of hazardous materials and the generation of hazardous waste, and in significant improvements in water conservation. - Environmental compliance. - Management commitment and support. - Staff training, communications and teamwork. - Community service, one example of which is providing the City of Irvine with the opportunity to conduct emergency response training in their facility. Clearly, they have become a model industrial discharger and set a fine example for others to follow. In recognition of these achievements, I have a plaque this evening that I would like to present for their outstanding work and that I would like to present to Sue Chrismer who is the Environmental Manager of the Irvine Business Unit and Jim Ryan who is the Corporate Director of Environmental Affairs. Mr. Puckett, you are the Chairman of District No. 7 so would you like to come up here as well? Barry Hammond? -7- I would like to present to you this evening a plaque of our appreciation of excellence in pollution prevention and environmental compliance. Congratulations. JIM RYAN: Thank you very much. I've always had bad dreams of coming here and meeting Blake Anderson. I thought in lieu of all of the Academy Award winners speaking about environmental issues, I'd say something about cleaning up Hollywood. I do truly want to thank the Districts. Being an Environmental Director and Sue being Environmental Manager, we can share first hand that if you think raising kids is difficult, try management inside in the 90's. It is not fun, it is a challenge, we have to learn to cry, laugh and to work hard all the time. Sue has made my life wonderful; I can sleep at night. From our perspective it is a pleasure working with an agency like the Sanitation Districts. They've always been an agency that has been up front with us and we've been able to work with them. Honesty and integrity is always appreciated and we've never had fear and that helps alot. We are continuing to work and this has meant alot to our industry. This award has already made its way known through our industry and which was classically a- difficult industry, I think is seeing the light. We hope to be back and repeat. We thank you for the prayer. JC: We will continue on with General Manager's report. JWS: I think this is a good opportunity to lead into the last item that I would like to bring to your attention. The Source Control program really is the cornerstone of our wastewater management program and our primary mission which is protecting the ocean waters off the Orange County's coastline. Agenda Item #13 is for the renewal of our contract for Ocean Monitoring to comply with our conditions of our 301(h) Ocean Discharge Permit which is issued to us jointly by USEPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board of California. That is the program that we undertake to assure that we are protecting the beneficial uses of the marine water off of our coastlines. I would like to introduce Blake Anderson to you and ask him to make some overview comments and then he will introduce our Marine Scientist and Manager of our Compliance Division, Irwin Haydock who will show you a slide presentation on our program. BPA: Continuing on tonight's environmental management theme, we want to bring to your attention some of the major details of our ocean monitoring program. We have the obligation and the opportunity to conduct our ocean monitoring program, the lion's share of which is conducted under the contract of SAIC or Science Applications International Corporation. We have an obligation to conduct the very extensive monitoring program because we operate under a special provision of the federal Clean Water Act that we often refer to as Section 301(h) which allows for a high quality but less than full secondary-treated discharge for those municipal wastewater agencies that discharge into deep, well mixed ocean waters that we have here in Southern California. -8- The monitoring program is designed to make certain that can detect any ad arse consequences of our discharge so that the regulators can take regulatory action and we can take operational action to stop the adverse consequences, if we were to detect them. This also is a major opportunity for the agency because the monitoring program you are about to here about provides the scientists that �..i worked for us and scientists that work for EPA, the Regional Water Quality Control Board with solid, well described and irrefutable evidence. This says that we can continue to discharge at less than full secondary treatment while adequately protecting the marine environment and public health. This is important because it allows us to minimize our use of energy, minimize our air emissions, minimize the truck traffic used to haul treatment chemicals into the plant and haul treated sludge out of the plant and saves this agency approximately $50 million a year in avoided operating and capital costs. I would like to introduce Dr. Irwin Haydock, who manages our ocean monitoring program and will describe our program and what it tells us and put it in relative terms of what is going on in the marine environment off Southern California. Irwin? IRWIN HAYDOCK: Thank you, Blake. Mr. Chairman, members of the Board, I am pleased to have to opportunity to speak to you about our ocean monitoring program and the SAIC contract. We are asking for an extension of the SAIC contract in the amount of $2.1 million on a later item tonight. I hope that in this brief time I can convince you of the importance of the program and the excitement as well as the pride that we take in the program and carrying it out. I just wanted to say a little bit about compliance. I have been here five years now �..i and have a small staff of scientists and engineers that manage the overall ocean monitoring program for the Districts and the contract with SAIC. We also have our own program in which we have developed a data management system, analytical system to review the data and a strong presence in marine science, not only locally, regionally, nationally and internationally. I can give you two quick examples. One is over the past few years we have been developing a more extensive water quality monitoring program. We will talk more about that later. As a part of that, we published some papers and this program is now being recommended as a template in the Santa Monica Bay area by the Hiperia treatment plant. So on a local basis we have been helping our neighbors. On a national basis, I just received word from Dr. Michael Rosenberg, one of my staff members that we have been written into the Gulf of Mexico program for the entire Gulf of Mexico to change the very direction that the program is taking in helping to see if they can't let the Gulf recover from what has been a real disaster in terms of their coastal resources from a number of different factors; not only pollution but fishing, primarily lack of runoff into the coastal zones and the ---- zone in the wetlands. They have a long way to go and we are pleased that we have finally been successful at assisting that effort on a national basis and we are presently along -9- with Bla .e, who has been working on the National Research councils commission on urban management in the coastal zone. They have come up with a integrated coastal management concept that I think is ideal in order to get to the pines to the palms, in terms of managing our watershed and our coastal waters. We have to bring those together in a holistic sense and a total ecosystem sense to be able to understand what is going on and how to properly manage it. Now I have some slides for you tonight that I would like to show. I have four tasks to provide you with the proper setting for our ocean monitoring work to explain to you a little bit about our permit to show you some of the action that takes place at sea and provide finally a prospectus for the commitment that I am asking you to make in terms of our Year Nine Monitoring Contract. This is an introduction to Ocean Monitoring. This is the area that we monitor and the types of measurement that we are making. It is about a 25 square mile area that includes the coastline out to sea and down to the bottom of the ocean. The pipeline that discharges our effluent is about 5 miles offshore, the last mile of which is the diffuser system that squirts the effluent into the sea water and creates an immediate mixing of 150:1 dilution and subsequent transport by currents move that seawater mixture away from the outfall. So this is the monitoring area and this is really just a small part of the total concern in terms of overall watershed and the effects that come into the coastal zone from that watershed. This represents the home of 4 million people and Blake tells me there are 2 million people equivalent in cows that live in the basin, so it has a tremendous impact both on the air, the land and in the waters. All of that eventually goes down hill and ends up in the ocean so management requires looking at the scale of things. In the terms of scale I think we can go a step further and look at a larger scale and that is the entire Southern California region with all of its 26 major and minor rivers that are on an average put in about 2 million acre feet of water a year and on a good year maybe 20 acre million feet of water a year. This provides both the nutrients and the sands for the coastal zone and provides food for all of the fishes and creatures that live there. That is the big picture and that is where Wayne and Blake have been working in Washington DC to get watershed management into the Clean Water Act so we can take a holistic approach to this. I just want to give you a little of my history. I have been in this business about 35 years and I started out with my first job as a seasonal aide for Fish and Game working on the California abalone. This is the filet mignon of the sea and is the state mollusk that is the snail. I worked on this in 1957 for a summer out at the Channel Islands and had alot of fun meeting the great white steamer and also planning and removing abalone and tagging them to find out where they move. My concern is that on my watch we have seen the California abalone go from about 4 million pounds a year to almost nothing today. The last time I saw it in the market it was $58.00 a pound. These are resources that are being effected by a number of different factors. There is over fishing and pollution, there is loss of -10- 50% of our kelp beds, there is a lack of run-off in nutrients. There are sea otters in the Central coast that love abalone more than any other sea delicacy. This is a concern and on my watch I have seen a general decline in resources and I think we that need to think about how we can manage it in a more holistic system. .,i What is a 301(h) permit? Primarily it is a permit that allows a high quality but ---- full secondary treatment. The key point is that we must prove that there are no significant impacts on the marine environment as a result of this discharge and we must meet all state and federal criteria. It is a very limited allowance and it must be proved by continuous and high quality monitoring. Districts monitoring components, the one I want you to focus on is the last one, the receiving water. There are several other elements of the program that are taking care of in the total monitoring program. I am going to focus on the last one. Our objectives are to do a variety of things but again the one that is the primary one is to determine the compliance with the 301(h) criteria which are set by a number of guidance documents in the California ocean plan. I want to show you something about the effectiveness of our Source Control plan. This shows you the effluent quantity in terms of flow of millions of gallons per day on the right hand side and on the left the total heavy metals per day from the 1970's through today and you can see that we have done a fine job in terms of source control. To give you a little bit of the chronology, the Clean Water Act passed in 1972. Subsequent to that in 1977 the amendment was passed that allowed 301(h) permits. In 1985 we were given one of the first and the largest permits for 301(h). There was a five year monitoring program built into that permit in 1990; it ended and the permit expired and had to be extended administratively and then finally in 1993 1 am here asking for Year Nine of the monitoring program to start even though we have not seen our permit renewal yet. Year Nine study consists of a number of elements monitoring to semi-annual monitoring of the marine environment. What I want to call your attention to is additional studies that are asked for in this overall program that add some costs to the program and to point out that those are vital from the point of view of helping us to develop the technique and understanding of a better monitoring program in the future especially a regional monitoring program who would contribute along to the other agencies to doing a better job. Secondly, the fact that these studies will be essential in terms defending our existing application for renewal of the permits so we are trying to tie all of the ends up and make sure there are no loose ends. We put out an annual report each year and the Boards sees a summary of that report but the annual report contains a number of chapters going from the very basis of the data to a final assessment of compliance with the rules and regulations and an extensive examination of all of the marine organisms that we collected during the year. _11_ I want to show you a series of slides that kind of shows you the action going on. This is our reef environment covered with the various organisms that live on the reef. There is a fish that you can see here; sea anemones. This reef like aspect is only due to the presence of the outfall. Most of the area is very low relief, soft sediments where we have to get samples from the bottom to get the animals out. �./ There are lots of animals under there and all those little holes contain animals. The "King Kong" on the left there is crawling along the bottom and lives by eating bottom sediments. We go to the shoreline collecting samples for bacteria using sophisticated water quality profiling information and take samples of water and the bottles above the profiling system is below which measures various water quality parameters with depth ---- to the bottom of the ocean. The ---- program is the largest program to take grab samples of the bottom sediments, bring them a board, spill the mud out into a basket which has fine mesh screen and eventually fish the organisms out of that screen material and weigh, count and identify every single organism. We catch millions of them. We do fish trawling, drag the trawl through the ocean, bring the catch on board and you can see fish and crab when it first comes aboard and finally the sorting activity, identifying of all of the organisms and the various measurements and put in the data base. Finally, we sample tissue to measure contaminant levels and do histopathology of the tissue to see if there is evidence of disease by the outfall or by other factors in the sediments. Now I would like to go through a comparison. The costs ------ past nine years are shown here and you can see we've had a fairly steady program. The green is the basic monitoring costs, the yellow is the ----- and the red is the ------ You can see it is fairly stable and the reason for that is because I have a very tough staff that has simply ---- the consultants about the ---- to make sure that all costs were accounted for and every year we've tried to get more for less. You can see that we've done a pretty good in that. DIRECTOR: Question about Year 4 dollar amounts? IH: We took it away from them because they had some problems of there own and they owed us extra work and so they did that extra work. Year Nine is the one that we are talking about tonight and you can see we have added additional options to evaluate several techniques to be used in the monitoring program to better estimate our ability to sample the sediments and get a good measurement of chemistry. We have some tests that will be related to more directly to outfalls than in the past so we can try to separate runoff from outfall material. We especially have a fairly expensive current reading program that is a part of that last year. But just to show you what we've done here is shift the costs from overall compliance to our contractors so that we will have time to not only manage the project but also to spend our time thinking about the issuance of the permit. We expect a decision any day now even though there were question marks on the slide. The EPA is working on our permit reapplication and is -12- expected to come to some kind of conclusion so there will be a lot of work when that happens in defending the original application. This shows the costs overall. Although the base program has increased, the overall costs have decreased for the division. I want to show you what I think is .� the most important of all. That is the cumulative long term costs of this program. We have been monitoring now for 9 years and we have spent a little over $16 million to do that monitoring. Every year that goes by we avoid about $50 million in treatment costs so if you look, the comparison is quite obvious, almost one-half billion dollars to the good at this point and time. We believe, based on my experience, and I have probably over a total of 100 years of experience in marine biology and oceanography, ecology and statistics among my group in compliance and also with our consultants in the SAIC which have experts all over the country that work on this program. I counted over 75 names of people who were working on the annual report and providing various services. So I think this is sort of the proof of the ----- and we believe that based on all of our work we can assure you that we are in substantial compliance with the state ocean plan and substantial compliance with EPA's criteria for 301(h) waivers. We are going to continue to provide information to solidity that position and to make sure that when the permit renewal takes place we will be right there in front of the line. We know that there are things that we want to do to our monitoring program to tune it up and we know we would like to make it more regional in nature and cooperate with the other groups. We've spent the past couple of days talking with people at the state, federal and national level about the monitoring programs in general in California. We think California has lead the nation in its regulatory program. They were the first to have an ocean plan back in 1972 before the Clean Water Act was amended. We think that we can be the first to have the best program that looks at the areas of the pines to the palms and includes watershed management as well integrated coastal management. I think that way we can get ahead of the elephant instead of continually going around behind and shoveling up. The real point is ocean protection and that is what we are doing for you. We are looking hard from daily, monthly, quarterly, semi-annually and all the time to make the sure that we protect the ocean. Thank you. DIRECTOR WEDAA: This contract is for $2.1 million for this year and ----. The question I would like to address is how SAIC manages financially a program of this complexity -----? Do you understand the question? IH: They submit their bills for work directly on contract. That is how we know what its costs; they submit the bills on pricing. Are you talking about, how do we know whether..... They have a financial system at their end and we have our own financial system at our end. In my office in Compliance we have a spreadsheet that we've set up on which we keep track of all the costs since Year 1. We try to get them to total this way and this way so when we're through, we will know where we are. -13- DIRECTOR WEDAA: Are they timely? IH: Their bills are timely. Is that what you are referring to? DIRECTOR WEDAA: I'm referring to all aspects to it. IH: Yes, I think they are timely in terms of their accounting and submitting the bills. We then go through the bills and review phone calls or whatever is on them for costs. We know what it costs to examine a sample and get results, so we know what the estimate and the price ought to be. DIRECTOR WEDAA: What type of financial relationship have we had with SAIC in terms of their ability to complete the job on time and the budget dollars. IH: We have had problems all of which we solved. My staff works closely with the contractor. They do very well in the field getting all of the samples. We have a monthly tracking system that says this is what was suppose to have been taken, this is what was taken and where it is at right now. DIRECTOR WEDAA: -------- relative to the financial tracking system. BPA: Let me see if I can answer the question. Every year it is a lump sum contract that we have done with them every year. We look at the costs of the contract year after year and as you can see the base program has remained relatively flat over the last nine years. In the first year, there were a half a dozen contractors who submitted proposals for the contract. SAIC came in as one of the lowest and even with the adjustments that we have had over the years, they are at a price today that many of their other competitors were bidding back 1985. We know the extent of the program, we know how many samples are to be taken, a lump sum price is negotiated and we hold them to that. It is for that reason that on Year Four you saw a zero profit from SAIC. They had some problems with some of their chemical analyses and they ate that cost. Irwin's guys have been pretty tough on them, year after year. IH: It hasn't exceeded the contract costs. DIRECTOR MORENO: By doing all of this, we have diverted $15 million? IH: That is our estimate based on about $1.4 billion, 30 year cost. That is the estimated avoided costs of not having to build full secondary treatment back in 1985. It was originally required in 1977 and then brought forward to 1985 and now 1988. Had that been built that would be the avoided costs per year. DIRECTOR MORENO: A few months ago I attended a conference with LIC Mexicsl?I• It has been around for a long time. It is under the LIC system that has scientists and professors that get together and do research. I was just curious if there was any way you could hook up with them. They have scientists from Mexico. -14- IH: I am not aware of that one but I work through the one called "Coffee Program" that has an annual conference in Sylmar. They have ------ and a number of other Mexican institutions that come up for that program. So every year we talk to the marine scientists in the marine stations that are along the coast between here and the tip of Baja and then Mexico City. To that extent we are aware of. More of that needs to happen so I'm pleased to hear about that. DIRECTOR LUTZ: Do you find that things are staying level as far as contamination? IR: No, contamination in the sediments at the most contaminated station which is right next to the outfall, slides that show that source control of heavy metals there is a very dramatic decrease since the late 70's measuring trace metals. We see that type of decrease. At the control station there has been no change in that same period of time. Yes, we do see a response right at the outfall in the immediate vicinity. They allow you a very small area in the area of the outfall that can be changed. It cannot have any adverse effect from that change. Things are getting better in that sense. In terms of the other parameters I would say that we have seen very little change over the years. Things haven't changed in terms of the outfall except for the trace metals. DIRECTOR SWAN: 1 understand that the work that we are doing this year is to determine how much is coming from the Santa Ana River and the other estuaries in separating it ------- separate from ----- the effluent impacts? IR: That is one of the things we would like to look for. We are going to use a specific tracer of the effluent to try and pinpoint whether sediment samples taken in different localities have that same tracer. We are also use zinc and aluminum which comes from natural runoff as a ratio with other elements to see if we can see river ratios as opposed to outfall ratios. The outfall is the biggest river in Southern California right now. Natural river material that came down before can be located at depth in the sediments and by looking at those ratios we can estimate what the source was. The hard part is determining the source. DIRECTOR GRIFFIN: Since the inception of this program, I think I am the only Director here today that has been involved in the effluent selection committee process from the original proposals. As proud as I am of the Sanitation Districts, I am very pleased with the performance that we have received out of SAIC. It is through the troubles and trials that we find how to monitor. I have found these people to always be very cooperative and they were always willing to talk and come to the table. I think we really have some experts and I am real proud of the program as someone that has seen it from the start. I think we really have a credible program and probably second to none. IR: I thank you for that comment. JWS: Just a couple of brief closing comments. In 1972 when the Clean Water Act was adopted by Congress it has a uniform national standard of secondary treatment and that was of some concern to us because it didn't seem to make -15- sense that the same standard should be applied to a POTW that is discharging into the Mississippi River or one of the Great Lakes, and to have the same standards applied to a deep ocean water discharger. So we gathered some scientists, engineers and the assistance of other POTW's but Orange County was really the driving force. It took us 5 years but in 1977, as the slide showed you, we were able to convince Congress that didn't make sense; that it wasn't the wisest use of limited public resources and they did adopt a 301(h) section that allowed a high quality but less than full secondary treatment to be discharged. As Blake and everyone said that saves our ratepayers $50 million and I think the Boards can take great pride in the fact that Orange County does not just follow national policy but we in fact sets national policy. A question was ask, when do we think the waiver renewal to be granted to us. The waivers are issued for 5 years. As I said, in 1977 the Clean Water Act was amended to allow 301(h) waivers. EPA and those who applied had to satisfy a very stringent set of criteria to be eligible for consideration. In 1985 EPA issued the first waiver and they issued it to us. So it took them eight years to issue the first waiver. We did a $5 million study in 1989 that these Boards adopted. It is what we call our 2020 Vision - 30 Year Wastewater Management Action Plan. Part of that was a decision of the Boards after studying several scenarios of treatment, including full secondary. The Boards determined that our program is protecting the beneficial uses of the ocean and opted to apply for renewal of that waiver. When we submitted that application in August of 1989, our current permit expired in February of 1990. We are still waiting word from EPA on their tentative decision. I wish I could answer your question. They wrote the book on our waiver. First round took eight years. We're in three years now on this one and I can't answer your question. Irwin said we expect it momentarily but we have been expecting that since August of 1989. We actually had to apply for the renewal six months in advance of the expiration of our existing permit to give them time to review the application and make a decision. EPA is not known for making quick decisions. We reported to you a few months ago that they finally adopted the 503 users sections in the Clean Water Act. 503 sludge regulations took them 14 years to do that. The good news is we are continuing to save $50 million a year while they consider this application. We have every reason to believe that they are going to approve it. We think we have made the scientific case for renewal of that waiver and we are optimistic. JC: I guess the question is when we get it, do we get it for five years from when it originally ended or do we get it for a new five years because we may get it and have to turn around and reapply. JWS: Inside these walls I predicted to our staff that the second five year period would go by before we get the renewal. We have heard some horror stories about other permits where they have made them retroactive but like Blake told me as -16- recently as today, that the word Is that it will take effect when they approve it and it will be five years. BPA: I ask the EPA staff that question. Will it be retroactive and they said that would be ridiculous, wouldn't it? #91c1 - CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO, 1. JOB NO J-19-1 DIRECTOR COLLINS: Another change order, although this one is a little different. This change order does not deal with the negligence of a consulting engineer or the mishaps in this ----- contracts. ----- shows that we put together plans for a Central Gen. Systems and that we were under certain requirements by the SCAQMD to insert sample ports on those systems. We did so. They came back to us and said we know we told you to put them there but now we want you to put them somewhere else, so we had to move them. It costs us $7,389 to move them. Not our fault but it is our money. I have a problem with that. It appears appropriate to have this on our consent calendar because it appears that we have no choice. We obviously will have to move to comply with the regulatory agency, however, I would like to remove the item. I want to highlight it to this Boards and I also want to be able to personally go against it so that it will not appear that this Board has a unanimous consent for this type of action. #91n1 - AUTHORIZING REIMBURSEMENT FOR TRAVEL. MEALS. ETC. DIRECTOR STEINER: Clarification -------- On the basis of the Orange County ------- Board and other boards that I have been involved with, out-of-state travel was ----- government board and I ask for clarification of that. JWS: In answer to your question, this item on the agenda is an annual item that comes at this time of the year at the same time that we adopt the Joint Works budgets for the succeeding year. It is a policy and an action that the Boards consider each year, actually since before I became General Manager. As adopted in previous years there is no such requirement. All of our travel with a few minor exceptions is within the United States. Occasionally there is a meeting in Canada that one of our staff members attends but we do not travel outside of the North American continent without Board authority. DIRECTOR STEINER: Said out of the state of California not out of the United States. JWS: I understand. DIRECTOR STEINER: ?????? DIRECTOR COLLINS: Do we have a breakdown of these costs as to how much money we have spent in sending people off? -17- JWS: We have the information. I don't have it here but I can ask Gary if he can answer that. GGS: The two-part answer, is we do certainly have the information but I can't answer your question tonight. DIRECTOR COLLINS: ------ because my question was going to be - I'd like to see the policy. I know we have a policy. I believe Director Steiner brought up an excellent point. ry JC: The motion is to defer this item. We have a motion and a second. Discussion? DIRECTOR MINER: In our yellow Manager's Report it includes that we have $225,000 for training needs and travel which is a reduction of 10% so it must have been quite a bit more budgeted. GGS: As I understood the question, it was just how much was spent on out-of-state travel, and that was the question that I couldn't answer. DIRECTOR MINER: So this includes all travel? GGS: All travel and training whether at our site or at another site. It also includes meetings. DIRECTOR MINER: I would also ask the Fiscal Policy Committee if we have a ... policy and is that available to the Boards so that we can see what the policy is for travel. JWS: The Boards have adopted an expense reimbursement policy and it applies to Directors as well as staff. It is based on a per diem as mentioned in here. It allows $6.00 for breakfast, $8.00 for lunch and $18.00 for dinner. As far as I know those are the lowest per diem rates I have seen around. There is another $6.00 in there just to cover incidental expenses. We do provide, as you know, meals at meetings such as you've all attended here on the various committees. Unless you consider Mimi's as a French Restaurant... Our employees, even myself, don't have District credit cards. We don't throw Christmas parties for employees or parties for any other reason. From what I read in the paper you could say we are probably a pretty dull place to work. We don't even plant trees like they do in Irvine. Our employees and Directors travel for three basic reasons. First, is to learn how to operate, maintain and repair the millions of dollars of electrical, mechanical equipment that we have installed in these plants and the biological and chemical treatment processes that we have here. The second reason is to learn about new rules and regulations and technology that we are subject to so that we can comply with the environmental and public health standards and also implement programs _18- to be as efficient and effective as possible. Lastly, as a major reason that we incur these type of expenses, we've been talking about all evening, and that is to attempt to influence federal and state laws and regulations so that we can bring some sense to them hopefully. We are not always successful, but again as I said, we do try and bring some reason to them and hopefully urge that they be adopted on a basis of scientific information rather than hysteria or politics. We will certainly be happy to provide that policy to the Directors. JC: One question that I would have is, if in fact this matter is deferred, will this impede our ability to perform pending further action on this matter? I don't mean necessarily all of ours? JWS: If if would be deferred it would put a freeze on all such expenditures until the Boards act. If the Boards wishes to defer this, I would ask that you consider giving us a 60 day authority or something until you have had a chance to review the policy and take whatever action you wish. DIRECTOR SWAN: I was going to suggest a substitute motion which was �f recommend being subject to having it reviewed at the next Fiscal Policy Committee and that is my recommendation. Review it and bring it back to the Boards but in the interim ---- General Manager ---- allow travel until such time is the policy is reviewed. JC: Ok, we have a motion and a second on a substitute motion. Further discussion? DIRECTOR COLLINS: Can we not take that action by going with the original motion and amending Item #15 of this agenda? JC: Actually if we just have the original motion to approve it with a 60 day bring back on this thing, it would basically give us the opportunity for 60 days to operate and then to review the policy and certainly make any corrections or changes at that time. DIRECTOR COLLINS: I don't mind amending that motion to include a 60 day window so if that would be appropriate -------- JC: It's a substitute to a substitute. How about a substitute; that would accomplish it. Is that acceptable? All right, we have to withdraw the motion to second. We'll make it the second on the original motion as amended and seconded. Ok, let's understand what it is. DIRECTOR COLLINS: We are asking that specific data from last year's budget be provided to us and the policy be provided to the Directors and a 60-day extension on the current authority be granted to the General Manager during the hiatus until JC: Ok that is a second that you made Jim. Is that acceptable, Wayne? We can operate within that? -19- DIRECTOR: The difference is he wants to bring this back to the General Boards instead of Fiscal Policy Committee? JC: You don't want it to go through the normal Fiscal Policy, Executive Committees back to the Boards? DIRECTOR COLLINS: We have 60 days to play with, so send it to the Fiscal Policy Committee as long as it comes back to the Boards. JC: All right, our motion is exactly what you got except it will be submitted to the Fiscal Policy Committee, go through the Executive Committee and it will come back to the Boards at the end of 60 days. Can we make that in 60 days, Wayne? JC: We have one problem and that is the Fiscal Policy Committee is not going to meet in June so can we bump it 90 days? That means that the Fiscal Policy Committee is going to be pushed then to get it because they are not going to meet this month. We would meet in July and August. Clarify the motion. The motion is exactly as you said except it will be referred to the Executive Committee and then to the full Board. We have a motion and a second. Is there opposition to the motion? Seeing none, it will be deemed approved. k11 - NOMINATIONS FOR JC AND VJC JC: The rules of this are that we open nominations this evening, nominations are made. There is no actual election until next month at the July meeting and further nominations could be made at that time. We will not close nominations this evening. I will now open the floor for nominations for JC. DIRECTOR CATLIN: I nominate VJC, Evelyn Hart. JC: Any further nominations? DIRECTOR BARRERA: I nominate Bill Mahoney. JC: Any others? It will be closed next meeting and there will be the election at that time. We will also elect a VJC. J/14(b)(4)(5)(6)(7) - 1993-94 JOINT OPERATING BUDGET/ CORF JOINT WORKS/ PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS JWS: As you know, we continue to place new facilities in line to meet increasing service demands and over the past three years we have placed over $300 million of new facilities into service at the two treatment plants. We continue to face new and stricter regulatory requirements. The impact of all these things in our daily activities continues to place a significant demand on our resources, as you well know, coupled with the state's taking of our property taxes, the problem is certainly exacerbated. While we have the ability to adjust our user fees to -20- accommodate these demands we are really sensitive to the fact that the cities, our member agencies, county and other special districts that are on the Boards are having difficult financial times. Last year, as you recall, because of the state of the economy I recommended to you that you hold the line on the budgets and hold the line on sewer use fees and connection fees. I have issued that same challenge to our staff this year, department heads to come up with a hold the line budgets so we would not have to increase fees for sewer connections and sewer use charges. You took an action earlier this year in April to endorse that policy and we have drafted budgets consistent with that. 1 would like to take just a moment and briefly and publicly commend our department heads because they certainly have risen to the challenge of holding the line to making organizational changes, changes in the way we operate the plants and other changes and we have actually been able to reduce our budget over the last two years $34.9 million last year and another $9.7 million for a total reduction of over 27% in the two years for a Joint Works Budget. Tonight, before you, the Joint Works Budget recommendations for next year has been reviewed by the Fiscal Policy Committee for over the past three months and by the Executive Committee at their last meeting. They consist of three major elements. The Joint Operating Budget which funds the operation, maintenance and administrative costs of the Joint Works as well as a significant portion of our research, much of what you heard earlier today in the presentation on the Ocean Monitoring program. The budget is projected of $49.6 million next year and it also includes the self-funded insurance budgets. The second element of the Joint Works Budget is the personnel budget which covers staffing levels which is actually included in the Joint Operating Budget. It is recommended that we delete one position this year for a savings of $42,732.00. Last year, as you may recall, we deleted five positions. Finally, the third element of the Joint Works Budgets is the CORF budget which funds the construction of new treatment plant expansion and improvement projects. Last year we cut $33.5 million out of that CORF budget. This year we cut another $10.6 million. Recommended CORF budget for next year is $70.0 million. The overall two year reduction is $44.5 million. As I said earlier, 27.1%. Mr. Chairman, that is as brief of a report as I can give. We could have the Director of Finance hit some of the highlights of these Joint Works Budgets at the Boards pleasure. JC: Let me ask if there is anyone wishes to have that done? DIRECTOR SAPIEN: We are suppose to spend $1.9 million for gas for the digester for the Central Generation Plant. Now we authorized the Central Gen. plant 2 1/2 years ago and they ----- because of problems that we had. Why is it the compression ----------???????? TMD: Director Sapien, all of the facilities necessary for Central Generation are complete and in place. The gas expenditures are for two things. First of all, the -21- project was sized when we originally designed it for as large of a project as we could hopefully get permits for from the Air Quality District. Initially, that this a little bit bigger than we have digester gas for 100% digester gas fuel. In the early years we're going to supplement our digester gas with natural gas. As our flows go up and sludge goes up our digester gas will go up and gradually we won't buy any natural gas except for the second reason that we buy it. These very cleaned burned engines have a state-of-art ignition system which will always use natural gas in the initial ignition of each rotation of the piston, each time it comes up and fires. It will start the ignition on a little bit of natural gas which then ignites the digester gas and that is how we get the extremely low emissions from these engines. This is all planned for and it is going exactly as planned. DIRECTOR SAPIEN: ????? GGS: It is time for me to stand up to the plate. That is a typographical error but where it says compression, it is suppose to say transmission. That is the line between the two plants to equalize the gas flow from where it is produced to where it is needed. That is a mistake on my part; I am glad you found it. I didn't see it in there earlier. JC: Moved and seconded. Roll call vote. DIRECTOR: ???? TMD: There were several contracts awarded to build our Central Gen facilities and the transmission facilities were included under a separate contract than Brinderson or Hunter. I am pleased to tell you, it is in today as of the writing of that document a few months ago. We will be able to use those when we bring these things on line in July. They will be complete on time. As of that writing they were not yet finished. DIRECTOR SAPIEN: So they were not finished when the engines were suppose to be ready? TMD: No and they didn't have to be to make the project run. We would just use the gas at each plant. The transmission facilities give us the ability to send it either way, as we desire. It was never planned to have it done at that time. #14(b)(8) - FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST SWAP DIRECTOR SWAN: This is with the understanding that this is subject to the review approval so we are not approving this transaction at this time. We are just authorizing additional study preparation. JWS: That is correct. That is stated in the actions themselves. DIRECTOR STEINER: Abstention for #14(b)(8)(a) JC: Deemed approved. -22- #141b1(9) - ADVANCE REFUNDING COP 1993 SERIES 1 DIRECTOR STEINER: Abstention for #14(b)(9)(a) JC: Deemed approved. #16 - PRIORITY PROJECTS ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-38-2 TMD: This project is to repair of many things at this plant. It includes 21 separate items. The most costly of which is the replacement of all of our old gates at our metering structure. That is probably one-half the cost. I am pleased to report that our engineer's estimate was $5.0 million and the low bid submitted by Pascal & Ludwig Engineers was $3.36 million which is pretty typical of the terrific low bids that we have been receiving on nearly every job. Our recommended action is for you to approve two clarifying addendums that were issued during the bid process and award this project to the low bidder in the amount of $3,364,600.00, Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. #18 - SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEM TMD: We had some bad luck this week in the Santa Ana River. We had an old sewer in which there was no sewage but was still connected to the plant. It had been abandoned on the east side of the river. The removal of this line and the plugging on the west side of the river was to be done by the Corp of Engineers as a part of their river contract. We also had in there that they would notify us before they went to work on it. The plugging and the notification did not happen. They removed the section out of the middle which wouldn't have caused any problem except for the unusual storm of Saturday. That caused a discharge in the rivers. In fact the Corp of Engineers released water out of Prado Dam and flooded their own contractor in their own project here. The bulldozers were actually under water. The sad part for us is that they had this line open and river water came into our plant and it had alot of sand. We think we had 6 to 8 feet of sand in our headworks. Our maintenance and operations crew have been working around the clock and trying to remove that. We believe it is a substantial effort. When our bar screens went down because of the big load we bypassed sand and water to Plant No. 2. We have to clean some lines down at Plant No. 2. Tonight we are asking for emergency authorization to spend up to $250,000 for this cleaning effort. We believe all of it should be repaid by the Corp of Engineers and we are asking for authority to collect that money. #17 - CLOSED SESSION TLW: Mr. Chairman and members of the Board, we are authorized to convene in closed session and it is my recommendation to do so for the sole purpose of one item tonight. -23- We have previously received a written claim from the law firm of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon who is the Districts bond counsel seeking to requesting additional compensation relating to the 1992 Refunding transaction. That claim has previously been acted upon and in my opinion there is possibility that litigation could ensue. 24 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA May 19, 1993 tgem EWe AN E eo.WX e127 \J MWNNVw ,uu NA Wz 127 0141W.zen MEMORANDUM TO: J; ayne Sylvester > ta Brown RE: Meetings for Listing on June Agenda I am requesting that the following meetings be scheduled in June: 1 . Joint Works Selection Committee: A. PSA re geotechnical services B. PSA re P1-46/P2-55 (Chem/wastehauler/plant water modifications) \� 2 . Special Selection Committee re Computers (Job No. J-25-1) To seek direction 3. Building Committee: • Existing Lab, Job No. J-11-1 (need more money) • Status of settlement of Job No. J-7-4 Status of Warehouse/Maint. Bldgs at Plant 2 • Addn. 2 to PSA with Brown and Caldwell Screen for mufflers on CPG Bldg. roofs • Potable city water system at Plant 2 (possible) 4. District 7 Selection Committee: PSA for Cont. 7-22 5. Districts 1 and 7 Selection Committee: PSA for Cont. 7-23 ^ (Boyle) Thooma�s M. Dawes Director of Engineering TMD: jt \WPD0C\EMG\MGRRFTS\jun93.mtg COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 3, 51 69 7, 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON JUNE 9, 1993 _ ol"CATION 2 0`opoliien o o O"TT� Sove I95e OAgNGE COOV�C ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on June 9, 1993,at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation Me red was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: . Robert Richardson, Chairman Thomas E. Lutz x Fred Barma.Chairman pro hem Gene Beyer x James M. Ferryman Nine Read. Thomas R. Saltarelli _x Leslie Primitive Room Stanton �_ William G. Steiner DISTRICT NO.2: _4_ John Collins, Chairman George Scott • Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman pro ter John M.GNlkson _g_ Fred Barren Sam Bayer' Bob Bell _ Barry Deroa Buck Catlin Molly McClanahan William D.Mahoney James H.Flora Maria Morero Norman Z. Eckemode y_ Caney J.Nelson _ Glean Parker Iry Pickle, Tom Daly _ Miguel Pulido g_ Thomas E. Lun _ Roger Stanton i_ WRlum G.Steiner y George L.Zlaket _ Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO. 3: _a— Sal A.Saimn, Chairman Don Mixtures _L game Dunlap. Chairman pro rem Caney J. Nelson Buck Catlin Most McClanahan Alen Coning George Scott James V. Evans Margie L. Rice i_ James H. Flora Wgiam D.Mahoney Don R.Griffin Arthur Brown _L Gail Kerry Cecilia L. Age y Frank Lastfa Gwen A.Forsythe x Thomas E. Lu¢ Robert Richardson Eva G.Miner Wally Linn In,Fickler Tom Daly _x Jim Silva Earle Robitaille L Sheldon Singer George L. Zlaket Roam Stanton ,�_ William G. Steiner 3_ Charles SYlvis Ronald Bates DISTRICT NO.6: John C. Co.. Jr., Chairman Jan Debay Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tern Jan Debay y William G. Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. S: 1� James A.Wander, Chairman Armn r Ferry L Evelyn Hart,Chairman pro tom John C. Cox, Jr. L William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: y Charles E. Puckett. Chairman Thomas R.Salarelli y James A.Wavier. Chairman pro hem _ Mike Scheeler y_ Fred Barren _ Gene Bayer An Debay Phil same. Barry Hammond Mike Ward Tad Marine Miguel Pulido William G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: . Grace Wrichell, Chairman Earle Robitaille x_ Victor Leipzig, Chairman pro tem Jim Silva Roger Stanton x William G.Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: _� John M.Gulf uion, Chairman Harry W.Wades • Fred Barrera,Chairman pro hem Gains Beyer Glenn Parker Some Dunlap Iry Pickier Tom Daly William G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: _JL Peer A.Swan, Chairman Dmryl Mille, Leslie Pontious. Chairman pro tent Charles E. FiMkett Fred Barren Gene Sever y Berry Hammond _ Mika Ward x Wilier G.Steiner Roger Stanton —2— 06/09/93 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board n Secretary, Laurie Bluestein, Susan Bradford, Corinne Clawson, Mark Esquer, Patti Gorczyca, Gary Hasenstab, Irwin Haydock, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Margie Nellor, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, George Robertson, Michael Rozengurt, Mary Simpson, Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Sue Chrismer, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Ed Long, Jim Ryan, Phil Stone ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized Mr. Ed Long Request of Mudge Rose Guthrie of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, Alexander & Ferdon for who has served as the Districts' bond reconsideration of Boards' denial of counsel. Mr. Long addressed the Boards additional fees for bond counsel requesting reconsideration of his firm's claim services re Advance Refunding for additional fees and answered Directors' Certificates of Participation, questions relating to the special co-bond 1992 Series counsel services provided by his firm re Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series, which the Boards denied at the April 14, 1993 meeting. The Joint Chairman then announced that the claim and request for reconsideration would be discussed later by the Directors in closed session. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that the Report of the Joint Chairman dedication ceremony for the Central Power Generation facilities was scheduled to be held on Wednesday, June 30th, at 4:30 p.m. at Plant No. 1 . Staff will also be conducting plant tours before and after the ceremony. Chairman Mahoney then congratulated the Districts' General Manager, Wayne Sylvester, who was re-elected President of the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) at their annual meeting in Baltimore last month. He stated that AMSA represents the nation's largest sewerage agencies at the federal level and has a national office and staff that is maintained in Washington, D.C. that °c works with Congress and the regulatory agencies on wastewater management issues. -3- �.� 06/09/93 �../ The Joint Chairman then announced the tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Districts 1 & 7 Selection Committee - Friday, June 18th, at 7:30 a.m. Joint Works Selection Committee - Wednesday, June 23rd, at 4:30 p.m., immediately preceding the Executive Committee meeting Executive Committee - Wednesday, June 23rd, at 5:30 p.m. (Directors Thomas Lutz and Ted Moreno were also invited to attend.) Engineering and Construction Committee - Tuesday, June 29th, at 4:30 p.m. Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers - Tuesday, June 29th, at 6:00 p.m. Central Power Generation Facility Dedication at Plant No. 1 - Wednesday, June 30th, at 4:30 p.m., at Plant No. 1 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager added to the Joint Report of the General Manager Chairman's remarks regarding AMSA and reported that AMSA has an excellent reputation in Washington, both on Capitol Hill and with EPA, as a prominent player in water quality issues at the national level; and commented on AMSA's involvement in the current Congressional proceedings regarding renewal of the Federal Clean Water Act. He also noted that the Districts' Director of Technical Services, Blake Anderson, and the Districts' Source Control Manager, Margie Nellor, are also very active in AMSA. As a result, Orange County is playing a major role and is at the table when national priorities for clean water are discussed and decisions are made. He stated that he and the Districts' staffers try to bring some reason and sound judgement to the process to hopefully have laws and regulations written on the basis of scientific evidence and fact rather than hysteria and politics. DISTRICT 7 The General Manager observed that the Presentation of Source Control Award Directors probably noticed in the lobby this to Diceon Electronics. Inc. evening a display which was put together by AMSA and EPA on a study done on pretreatment successes across the nation. The Districts were one of the case studies. He then asked Margie Nellor to review the study. ... -4- 06/09/93 Ms. Nellor stated that the display in the lobby was a product of a cooperative study between the EPA and AMSA. It is a $200,000 effort, which collected information which demonstrates the relationship between successful wastewater management programs and technologies, and improvements in the nation's waters. She further stated that part of the project is to put together educational information and materials for technology transfer. The poster is one product of that. The poster is a mobile poster and will go around the country. The Districts' are highlighted on the poster as one of the success stories based on the Districts' Source Control program and its significant reductions in industrial discharges which have resulted in improvements in our coastal waters. We have achieved those reductions through our industrial permitting, monitoring and inspection/enforcement program and our policy of promoting pollution prevention. Ms. Nellor reported that currently about 95% of the Districts' regulated industries have implemented some type of pollution prevention. They have either put in equipment to reduce water usage, reduce the use of hazardous materials or the generation of hazardous waste, or they have changed their operational procedures to do those same things. She further stated that these reductions could not have been achieved without the cooperation of the industries that the Districts' serve. Joint Chairman Mahoney then stated that one of these industries, Diceon Electronics, Inc., a District No. 7 permiee located in Irvine, manufactures multi-layer printed circuit boards for the computer and telecommunications industries and employs approximately 382 employees, had recently received an award from the California Water Pollution Control Association. This award is given to outstanding industries who have demonstrated excellence in a number of areas including pollution prevention, environmental compliance and participating in community projects. Over the past several years, Diceon Electronics, Inc. has excelled in the following areas: - Pollution prevention research and development that has resulted in significant reductions in the use of hazardous materials and the generation of hazardous waste, and in significant improvements in water conservation - Environmental compliance - Management commitment and support -5- O6/09/93 Staff training, communications and teamwork - Community service, one example of which is providing the City of Irvine with the opportunity to conduct emergency response training in Diceon's facility Chairman Mahoney reported that Diceon Electronics, Inc., has become a model industrial discharger and has set a fine example for others to follow. In recognition of these achievements, he asked District No. 7 Chairman Charles Puckett and the City of Irvine's representative from District No. 7, Director Barry Hammond, to join him In presenting a plaque from the Districts to Sue Chrismer, Environmental Manager of the Irvine Business Unit and Jim Ryan, Corporate Director of Environmental Affairs for Diceon Electronics, Inc., recognizing their exemplary efforts. Following the presentation, Mr. Ryan expressed appreciation to the Boards for the award. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager stated that the Source Review of Districts' ocean monitoring Control program is the cornerstone of the and research grogram Districts' wastewater management program and its primary mission is to help protect the ocean waters off Orange County's coastline. He noted that later in the agenda Is an item to renew a contract for ocean monitoring to comply with the conditions set forth in the Districts' NPDES 301(h) ocean discharge permit which is issued to the Districts jointly by the U.S. EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. He then requested that Blake Anderson, Director of Technical Services, give an overview of the ocean monitoring program and then introduce Dr. Irwin Haydock, Manager of the Compliance Division, to review the major elements of the program. Mr. Anderson stated that staff wanted to bring to the Directors' attention some of the major details of the Districts' ocean monitoring program. The Districts' have an obligation to conduct the very extensive monitoring program as they operate under a special provision of the federal Clean Water Act which is often referred to as Section 301(h), which allows for a high quality, but less than full secondary treated discharge for those municipal wastewater agencies that discharge into deep, well-mixed ocean waters such as in Southern California. He further reported that the monitoring program is designed to make certain that we can detect any adverse consequences of our discharge so that actions can be taken to correct them. This program provides the scientists that work for the Districts, the U.S. EPA and the Regional Water Quality Control Board with solid, .ri -6- 06/09/93 well described and irrefutable evidence. This program proves that we can continue`+✓ to discharge at less than full secondary treatment and still adequately protect the marine environment and public health. This is also important because it allows the Districts to minimize use of energy, air emissions and the truck traffic used to haul treatment chemicals into the plant and to haul treated sludge out of the plant. Mr. Anderson said this saves our agency approximately $50 million per year in ' avoided operating and capital costs. He then introduced Dr. Irwin Haydock to the Directors. Using slides, Dr. Haydock spoke to the Directors in depth about the program and the Amendment No. 10 to the contract with SAIC for ocean monitoring services that would come up on the agenda that evening for approval, and answered questions of Directors. Mr. Sylvester closed by observing that in 1972 when the Clean Water Act was adopted by Congress, it had a uniform national standard of secondary treatment that was of concern to our staff and others in that it didn't seem to make sense that the same standard should be applied to a POTW that is discharging into the Mississippi River or one of the Great Lakes, and a POTW discharging into deep ocean waters. With the assistance of other POTWs, scientists and engineers, technical data was gathered and in 1977 we were able to convince Congress that it didn't make sense, that it wasn't the wisest use of limited public resources, and they, accordingly, adopted Section 301(h) of the Federal Clean Water Act that allows a high quality but less than full secondary treated wastewater to be discharged to deep ocean waters, provided strict conditions are met. He observed that this saves our ratepayers $50 million a year; and that the Boards should take great pride in the fact that Orange County does not just follow national policy but, in fact, helps to set national policy. Mr. Sylvester also mentioned that a $5 million study was conducted and adopted in 1989 by the Districts' Boards of Directors. The study, called 2020 VISION, is a 30-Year Wastewater Management Action Plan. A portion of that study examined the various scenarios of treatment levels up to and including full secondary treatment. Based on the engineering and environmental studies, the Boards determined that the current 301(h) program is protecting the beneficial uses of the ocean and opted to apply for renewal of the existing ocean discharge permit. A renewal application was submitted in August 1989. The current permit expired February 1990 but has been administratively extended pending a decision on the application for renewal. The Districts are still waiting to hear from EPA on their tentative decision on the application. -7- .� 06/09/93 DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 12, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 12, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as corrected and mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 12, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 12, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 12, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as corrected and mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 12, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 12, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 12, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ... -8- 06/09/93 DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held May 12, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 05/05/93 05/19/93 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - S 925,761 .41 $606,246.31 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,144,997.41 522,443.60 Joint Working Capital Fund - 4,856.44 12,508.12 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 166,996.29 158,466.00 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 9,009.70 500.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 37,407.00 158,234.60 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 52,656.17 26,034.15 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 63,693.06 11,494.69 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 6,438.92 26.34 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 11,433.62 8,520.17 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 12,269.37 16,107.81 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 102.28 .00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 601.64 1,762.35 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 151,338.13 181.38 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 32.83 2,702.18 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 15.26 7,082.40 53.587.609.53 51.532.310.10 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of One Self-Prooelled Aerial Work Platform. That the bid tabulation and recommendation Specification No. E-231. to Western re Purchase of One Self-Propelled Aerial Pacific Eauipment Company Work Platform, Specification No. E-231, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, -9- `.,.� 06/09/93 FURTHER MOVED: That the bid of Horizon High Reach Company be, and is hereby, rejected as not meeting the specifications; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Western Pacific Equipment Company for a total amount not to exceed $81,795.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Dionex Corooration for That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to Purchase of Supercritical Fluid issue a purchase order to Dionex Extraction System (Specification Corporation in the amount of $40,150.00, No. E-2331 plus sales tax and freight, for Purchase of Supercritical Fluid Extraction System, (Specification No. E-233). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizina staff to issue a purchase order to Skalar. Inc. for Purchase of That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to One Segmented Flow Analyzer issue a purchase order to Skalar, Inc. in the Upgrade (Specification No. E-2341 amount of $60,779.00, plus sales tax and freight, for Purchase of One Segmented Flow Analyzer Upgrade (Specification No. E-234). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Diaital Equipment Corporation That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to for Purchase of Upgrade for issue a purchase order to Digital Equipment Laboratory VAX 4000. Model 300 Corporation in the net amount of Computer System (Specification $34,984.48, plus sales tax and freight, for No. E-2351 Purchase of Upgrade for Laboratory VAX 4000, Model 300 Computer System (Specification No. E-235). „✓ -10- 06/09/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Millipore Corporation. Waters That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to Chromatography Division for Purchase issue a purchase order to Millipore ' of High Pressure Liquid Corporation, Waters Chromatography Chromatography System Division in the amount of $73,363.70, plus (Specification No. E-2361 sales tax and freight, for Purchase of High Pressure Liquid Chromatography System (Specification No. E-236). ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Specification No. M-044 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Specification No. M-044 Moved, seconded and duly carried: �✓ That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, making miscellaneous modifications and technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specification for Specification No. M-044 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, making miscellaneous modifications and revising the time for completion, be, and is hereby, approved. -11- �/ 06/09/93 Awarding Specification No. M-044 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-58, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, to Park Rose Construction, Inc., in the total amount of $199,200.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Director Collins voiced his concern that the Approving Change Order No. 22 to Air Quality Management District had the plans and specifications for Job changed the requirements for sample ports No. J-19-1 after originally approving them which required the Districts to move the sample ports at a cost of $7,389. He stated that although the Districts have to comply with AQMD's requirements, he would register his vote against this item so that it would not appear that the Boards have unanimous consent for this type of action. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried by majority vote: That Change Order No. 22 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $8,251.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for two items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Director John Collins requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Research Facility at Plant No. 2, Job Resolution No. 93-59, receiving and filing No. J-32, to Pascal & Ludwig bid tabulation and recommendation and Engineers awarding contract for Final Effluent Sampler System and Bioassay Research Facility at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-32, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount of $202,579.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ..✓ -12- 06/09/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 1 . Job That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt No. P1-42. and Miscellaneous Resolution No. 93-60, receiving and filing Improvements at Plant No. 2. Job bid tabulation and recommendation and No. P2-49. to Pascal & Ludwig awarding contract for Miscellaneous Engineers Improvements at Plant No. 1 , Job No. P1-42, and Miscellaneous Improvements at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-49, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount of $235,900.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 9 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee certification Brown and Caldwell Consulting of the final negotiated fee and Engineers for design of Job No. J-19 recommendation for design of Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19, providing for a reallocation of costs among categories with no change in the maximum authorized compensation, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-61 , approving Addendum No. 9 to said agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for said services, providing for a reallocation of costs among categories within said agreement with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $4,471,136.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee certification John Carollo Engineers for design and of the final negotiated fee and construction services, preparation of recommendation for design and construction operations and maintenance manuals services, preparation of operations and and training services for Job maintenance manuals, and training services Nos. P1-36 and P2-42 re Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 , Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, providing for modifications and changes to enhance the treatment process and provide operational flexibility and reliability for NPDES permit compliance, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, -13- 06/09/93 FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-62, approving Addendum No. 2 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $303,680.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $5,178,073.00 to an amount not to exceed $5,481,753.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to execute Gas Service Agreements and That the General Manager be, and is hereby, Contracts for Plant No, 1 and Plant authorized to execute Gas Service No. 2. for the ourchase of natural gas Agreements and Contracts for Plant No. 1 from the Southern California Gas and Plant No. 2, for the purchase of natural Company gas from the Southern California Gas Company, for the period January 1, 1993 to August 1, 1995, in form approved by General Counsel. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving First Amended and Restated Agreement for Utilization That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt of Reclaimed Wastewater with the Resolution No. 93-63 , approving First Orange County Water District Amended and Restated Agreement for Utilization of Reclaimed Wastewater with the Orange County Water District (OCWD), providing up to 50 mgd of secondary effluent to OCWD for recycling purposes at no charge, with a provision to, at any time, reevaluate the valuation and pricing for secondary effluent; and to provide for purchase of GAP water at the audited cost to operate and maintain the GAP facility with a provision that the Districts' cost would not exceed the 0&M cost or the lowest cost of any GAP customer, for a 20-year period, in form approved by the General Counsel. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -14- 06/09/93 ALL DISTRICTS In response to Directors' questions Authorizing the General Manager to concerning the Districts' travel policies and, designate members of the Boards specifically, authority for out-of-state travel, and/or staff to attend and oarticioate the General Manager briefly reviewed the in various training programs. policies and procedures that apply to both meetings, hearings. conferences Directors and staff, and the annual budget facility inspections and other for training, meeting and travel expenses. functions Travel expenses are reimbursed based on a $40.00 per day per diem and neither Directors or staff are issued credit cards. He also explained that the employees and Directors travel for three basic reasons. The first reason is to learn how to operate, maintain and repair the millions of dollars of electrical and mechanical equipment that we have installed in these plants and the biological and chemical treatment processes that we have here. The second reason is to learn about new rules, regulations and technology that we are subject to so that we can comply with the environmental and public health standards and also implement programs to be as efficient and effective as possible. The third reason is to attempt to influence federal and state laws and regulations so that we can bring some sense and reason to them. Following further discussion, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Districts' training, meeting and travel expense policy be referred to the Executive Committee for review; and, FURTHER MOVED: That during the interim period until August 11, 1993, pending said policy review, the General Manager is authorized to designate members of the Boards and/or staff to attend and participate in various training programs, meetings, hearings, conferences facility inspections and other functions which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts or affect the Districts' interests, including, but not limited to, those conducted by organizations providing specific training, state and federal legislative and regulatory bodies and the California Association of Sanitation Agencies, California Water Pollution Control Association, Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies, and the Water Environment Federation; and, that reimbursement for travel, meals, lodging and incidental expenses be, and is hereby, authorized in accordance with existing Districts' policies and the approved annual budget for 1993-94. -15- �„� 06/09/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Annual nominations for Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization The General Counsel briefly reviewed the provisions of the Districts' Rules of Procedure relating to nomination and election of the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman. This being the annual meeting fixed by the Boards at which nominations are to be made for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary then declared the nominations open. Directors William D. Mahoney and Evelyn Hart were nominated as candidates for the office of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. It was pointed out that nominations would remain open until the regular July Board meeting. The Secretary then reported that the election would be held at said July meeting in accordance with the Boards' Rules of Procedures for the Conduct of Business of the Districts. `.J Nominations and election of a Vice Joint Chairman will also be held at the regular July meeting. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve staff Summary Financial Report for That the staff Summary Financial Report for nine-month period ending March 31. nine-month period ending March 31, 1993, 1993 be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -16- O6/09/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Amendment No. 10 to Agreement with SAIC for ocean monitoring services re Districts' NPDES Ocean Monitoring Proaram required by EPA Receive. file and aoorove Staff Reoort and Recommendation for NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program Year Nine (1993-94) and the Soecial Joint Works Selection Committee Certification re Amendment No. 10 to Agreement with SAIC re Specification 5-032 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report and Recommendation for NPDES Ocean Monitoring Program Year Nine (1993-94) and the Special Joint Works Selection Committee Certification of the negotiated fee and recommendation for Amendment No. 10 to Agreement with Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Aoorovina Amendment No. 10 to the Agreement with SAIC re Specification No. S-032 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-64, approving Amendment No. 10 to the Agreement with SAIC for Ocean Monitoring Contract Services for Districts' 120-Inch Ocean Outfall, Specification No. 5-032, extending the contract from July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994, for an amount not to exceed $2,120,480.00 for Year Nine of said contract. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -1 T- 06/O9/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committee Committee and Executive Committee meetings held on May 19, 1993 and May 26, 1993, respectively, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. _ ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving the all-risk property insurance program That the all-risk property insurance program be, and is hereby, approved as follows: PROPERTY INSURANCE PROGRAM APPROVED (611/93-6/1194) All Risk Including Terms Earthquake and Flood Company Layered Program Coverage Manuscript All Risk Form $200,000,000 All Risk $100,000,000 Earthquake 5% Deductible Premium $1,000,000 to $1,100,000 (including taxes and fees) ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to direct Robert F. Driver Associates to place That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to Districts' all risk, earthquake and direct Robert F. Driver Associates to place flood Property insurance program the Districts' all risk, earthquake and flood property insurance program within the above indicated parameters to the lowest cost and acceptable carriers. ..� -18- 06/09/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Reaffirming existing policy of self- funding liability risk, and directing That the existing policy of self-funding staff to target a combined insurance liability risk, be, and is hereby, reaffirmed; reserve addressing both property and and, liability exposures to achieve a $200 million target funding level FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, directed to target a combined insurance reserve addressing both property and liability exposures to achieve a $200 million target funding level, subject to annual budgetary and fee policy determinations by the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager gave an overview of Receive and file Report of the the detailed 1993-94 Joint Works Budget Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy recommendations contained in the bound Committee re 1993-94 personnel budget report booklet provided to each requirements and Joint works budgets Board member with the agenda. He reported that the Districts continue to place new facilities on line to meet increasing service demands and over the past three years have placed over $300 million of new facilities into service at the two treatment plants. The Districts also continue to face new and stricter regulatory requirements. The impact of all of these things on daily activities continues to place a significant demand on Districts' resources. Coupled with the state's confiscation of Districts' property taxes, the problem is exacerbated. While we have the ability to adjust our user fees to accommodate these demands, the Districts are sensitive to the fact that the member cities, county and other special districts that are on the Boards are having difficult financial times. He reminded the Directors that last year because of the state of the economy he had recommended to the Directors that they hold the line on the budgets and hold the line on sewer use fees and connection fees. He issued that same challenge to staff this year, asking department heads to arrive at hold-the-line budgets so the Districts would not have to increase fees for sewer connections and sewer use charges. He also reminded the Directors that they took an action in April to endorse that policy and budgets have been drafted consistent with that action. -19- .� 06/09/93 `ftw, Mr. Sylvester commended the department heads for rising to the challenge of holding the line on Joint Works Budgets by making organization and operational changes, and have been able to reduce the budget over the last two years $34.9 million last year and another $9.7 million, for a total Joint Works Budget reduction of over 27% in the past two years. The General Manager reported that the Joint Works Budget consists of three major elements. The Joint Operating Budget, which funds the operation, maintenance and administrative costs of the Joint Works as well as a significant portion of our research, and includes the self-funded insurance budgets. It is projected at $49.6 million for next year. The second element, which is included in the Joint Works Budget, is the personnel budget which covers staffing levels. It is recommended that one position be deleted this year for a savings of $42,732.00. The third element, the CORF budget, funds the construction of new treatment plant expansion and improvement projects. Last year $33.5 million was cut out of the CORF budget. This year another $10.6 million was cut. The recommended CORF budget for 1993-94 is $70.0 million. Mr. Sylvester noted that the Joint Works Budgets had been reviewed by the Boards' Fiscal Policy Committee over the past three months and by the Executive Committee at its last meeting and the Committees recommend approval. Following discussion on certain budget items, it was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the report and recommendations of the Executive Committee and Fiscal Policy Committee re 1993-94 personnel requirements and joint works operating and construction budgets, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approvina 1993-94 personnel requirements and amending That the 1993-94 personnel requirements, Classification and Compensation be, and are hereby, approved; and, Resolution No. 79-20, as amended FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-65, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, re 1993-94 personnel requirements. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. �/ -20- 06/09/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Aoorovina the 1993-94 Joint following roll call vote: Operating Budget AYES: Fred Barrera, Bob Bell, Buck Catlin, John Collins, John C. Cox, Jr., Jan Debay, Burnie Dunlap, James V. Evans, James Ferryman, James Flora, Don Griffin, John Gullixson, Barry Hammond, Evelyn Hart, Gail Kerry, Victor Leipzig, Thomas Lutz, William Mahoney, Eva Miner, Maria Moreno, Ted Moreno, Carrey Nelson, Glenn Parker, Leslie Pontious, Charles Puckett, Robert Richardson, Phil Sansone, Sal Sapien, Jim Silva, Sheldon Singer, William Steiner, Peer Swan, Charles Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Henry Wedaa, Grace Winchell, George Zlaket NOES: None ABSENT: Frank Laszlo, Iry Pickler That the proposed Joint Operating Budget Funds of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 for the 1993-94 fiscal year, be, and are hereby, approved and adopted as follows: Fund Total Amount Joint Operating/Working Capital S 49,579,000 Workers' Compensation, Self-Insured 322,000.00 Self-Funded Health Plan Trust 3,594,000 Public Liability, Self-Insured 222,000 -21- �� O6/09/93 \.. W ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried by the Approving the 1993-94 Capital following roll call vote: Outlay Revolving Fund Budget AYES: Fred Barrera, Bob Bell, Buck Catlin, John Collins, John C. Cox, Jr., Jan Debay, Burnie Dunlap, James V. Evans, James Ferryman, James Flora, Don Griffin, John Gullixson, Barry Hammond, Evelyn Hart, Gail Kerry, Victor Leipzig, Thomas Lutz, William Mahoney, Eva Miner, Maria Moreno, Ted Moreno, Carrey Nelson, Glenn Parker, Leslie Pontious, Charles Puckett, Robert Richardson, Phil Sansone, Sal Sapien, Jim Silva, Sheldon Singer, William Steiner, Peer Swan, Charles Sylvia, James A. Wahner, Henry Wedaa, Grace Winchell, George Zlaket NOES: None ABSENT: Frank Laszlo, Iry Pickier That the proposed 1993-94 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund Budget (CORF Joint Works Construction) of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 be, and is hereby, approved and adopted in the total amount of $70,032,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP 11993 SWAPI Approving Letter Agreement with Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber for underwriting services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-66, approving Letter Agreement with Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber, dated May 13, 1993, for underwriting services, whereby Merrill Lynch will receive an amount not to exceed 10 basis points, and will pay to PaineWebber the lesser of the present value of five basis points or one-half of the total spread per annum from the net spread, subject to final approval of the 1993 SWAP by the Boards. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -22- O6/09/93 Director William Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Approving Letter Agreement with Orrick. Herrington & Sutcliffe for special Co-Bond Counsel services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-67, approving Letter Agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, dated May 12, 1993, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, based on standard hourly charges, for an amount not to exceed $15,000.00, subject to final approval of the 1993 SWAP by the Boards. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Approving Memorandum Agreement with Rourke. Woodruff & Spradlin for special Co-Bond Counsel services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-68, approving Memorandum Agreement with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, dated May 12, 1993, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, for a maximum fee not to exceed $5,000.00, subject to final approval of the 1993 SWAP by the Boards. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -23- �..� 06/09/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Advance Refundina Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1 Approving Letter Agreement with Merrill Lynch for underwriting services That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-69, approving Letter Agreement with Merrill Lynch, dated May 13, 1993, for underwriting services, for an amount not to exceed $8.50 per $1,000 certificate for a fixed-rate structure, or $3.50 per $1,000 certificate for a synthetic fixed-rate structure, subject to final approval of the 1993 Series 1 by the Boards. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director William Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Approving Letter Agreement with Orrick. Herrington & Sutcliffe for special Co-Bond Counsel services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-70, approving Letter Agreement with Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, dated May 12, 1993, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, for a maximum fee not to exceed $60,000.00 plus expenses for a fixed advance refunding structure, or a maximum fee not to exceed $85,000 plus expenses for a synthetic fixed advance refunding structure, subject to final approval of the 1993 Series 1 by the Boards. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. �/ -24- 06/09/93 Approving Memorandum Agreement with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin for special Co-Bond Counsel services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-71, approving Memorandum Agreement with Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin, dated May 12, 1993, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, for a maximum fee not to exceed $5,000.00, subject to final approval of the 1993 Series 1 by the Boards. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Amendment No. 2 to the Districts' Employee Commuter That Amendment No. 2 to the Districts' Program to help meet AVR goals to Employee Commuter Program be, and is comply with SCAQMD Rule 1503 hereby, approved; and, `..� (Specification No. A-170) FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to purchase up to three additional rideshare vans to help meet Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) goals to comply with SCAQMD Rule 1503, for an amount not to exceed $78,000 plus sales tax and delivery (Specification No. A-170). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and No. J-19A specifications for Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for Use in Central Power Generation Systems, Job No. J-19A, authorizing a net addition of $333,149.82 plus tax and freight to the contract with Cooper Industries for purchase of long-lead time spare parts and equipment to have adequate on-site inventory for needed system maintenance and repair, be, and is hereby, approved. -25- 06/09/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Director of Finance to certify claims and forward to the That the Director of Finance be, and is County auditor for payment hereby, authorized to certify claims and forward to the Orange County auditor for immediate payment for expenditures incurred after June 30, 1993; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors do hereby declare that such certification shall comply with the provisions of Resolution No. 76-10 pertaining to procedures for payment of claims against the Districts until the 1993-94 budgets are adopted by the respective Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2 Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2, includes 21 separate items of work, with the replacement of all of the old gates at the metering structure being the most expensive part of this project. Mr. Dawes stated that on May 18, 1993, six bids were received for this project. The bids ranged from a high of $4,934,350.00 to a low of $3,364,600.00, submitted by Pascal & Ludwig Engineers and recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. Approvina Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P1-38-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project to add Primary Influent Splinter Box at Clarifiers 6-15 modifications, and making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. `� -26- 06/09/93 Approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P1-38-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, clarifying temporary pumping instructions during Metering and Diversion Structure gate replacement, and making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Awarding Job No. P1-38-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-72, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, In the total amount of $3,364,600.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors of General Counsel's Comments Prior to the need for a closed session as authorized Closed Session by Government Code Section 54956.9 to review: 11 Review of claim filed by Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, Attorneys at Law and receive recommendation of General Counsel re possible litigation. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at 9:25 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boards of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. -27- 06/09/93 �../ ALL DISTRICTS At 9:44 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to emergency clean-up and repair of storm damage from rupture of Districts' Air Base Trunk Sewer (Specification No. R-041) Authorizing consideration of Supplemental Agenda Item relative to emergency clean-up and repair of storm damage from rupture of Districts' Air Base Trunk Sewer (Specification No. R-0411 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of a supplemental agenda item relative to emergency clean-up and repair of storm damage from rupture of Districts' Air Base Trunk Sewer (Specification No. R-041), which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that on Sunday Morning, June 6, Operations Division staff discovered excess water and sand entering the Reclamation Plant No. 1 barscreen and grit chambers. Operations, maintenance and engineering staffs tracked the source of the water to the Santa Ana River where a contractor, employed by the U.S. Corps of Engineers, had removed portions of an abandoned, but still connected, Districts' pipe line, allowing water from the unusually heavy rains of Saturday's storm to enter the plant. The freak storm inundated not only the Districts' trunk sewer, but all of the contractor's operation within the Santa Ana River. -28- 06/09/93 Complete abandonment of this old river crossing was part of the Corps flood control project. They were to have made a plug and were requested by Districts' staff to provide notification one week ahead of the planned work activity on the line. None of that occurred. The contractor removed several sections of the pipe, which contained no sewage. Staff quickly mobilized the Corps contractor and built a sand berm around the opening. At the same time, a concrete plug was poured in the line to prevent further entry of sand. The Districts many fail-safe systems worked and no sewage was spilled. Mr. Dawes reported that the large cleanup task has been started but the total extent of this work is not yet known. Up to six feet of sand has filled the Plant No. 1 headworks. The next night, when flows were lowest, Operations was scheduled to pump down the headworks to try to determine the extent of the deposits. Sewage and sand were also diverted to Plant No. 2 after the Plant No. 1 barscreens were damaged by the high sand and rock deposits. The extent of the cleanup necessary on the four-mile interplant line is also not yet known. However, the plant is back to normal operating procedures and cleanup is in progress. Staff estimates that to-date outside vendors' costs are about $25,000, plus the charges for staff work. Because the extent of the damage or the cleanup is not known, estimates of the costs are very preliminary. Mr. Dawes reported that the recommended action is to authorize the General Manager to procure services, equipment and supplies necessary to effect the emergency cleanup and repair in an amount not to exceed $250,000. The Director of Engineering also reported that staff believes that the Corps of Engineers and/or its contractor is responsible for all costs and recovery should be sought. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated June 9, 1993, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -29- O6/09/93 �..�' Authorizina the General Manaaerto procure necessary services. equipment and suoolies for emergency clean-up and repair of storm damage from rupture of Districts' Air Base Trunk Sewer (Specification No. R-0411 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to procure necessary services, equipment and supplies for emergency clean-up and repair of storm damage from rupture of Districts' Air Base Trunk Sewer, Specification No. R-041, caused by Corps of Engineers' contractor working on the Santa Ana River Flood Control improvement project, in an amount not to exceed $250,000.00; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff and General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to seek recovery of said costs from the responsible parties. DISTRICTS 1 & 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chance Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Contract That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and No. 2-30 specifications for Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, authorizing a net addition of $45,858.11 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company for three items of additional or modified work, and granting a time extension of 20 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:44 p.m., June 9, 1993. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:44 p.m., June 9, 1993. -30- 06/09/93 DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: �.✓ Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:44 p.m., June 9, 1993. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:44 p.m., June 9, 1993. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:44 p.m., June 9, 1993. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Anprovino plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-20 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-73-7, approving plans and specifications for Abandonment of the Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizina the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a That the Selection Committee be, and is Professional Services Agreement for hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and for design and construction services negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for Contract No. 7-22 for design and construction services for Parallel and Replacement of Portions of Lemon Heights Subtrunk, La Colina Drive to Newport Boulevard, Contract No. 7-22. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: didiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:44 p.m., June 9, 1993. -31- 06/09/93 DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:44 p.m., June 9, 1993. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:44 p.m., June 9, 1993. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:44 p.m., June 9, 1993. Assistant Secr ry a Boards of Directors of County Sa tion 1stricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -32- F� 0 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL • REPORT SNUMB INb DATE 4129193 FALL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID LS/05/93 POSTING DATE L5/45193 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OLSCRIOTION 129520 AEC MEMBERSHIP $135.00 POWER GENERATION ASSOCIATION 229521 AS TECH COMPANY 1133.911.2E RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.30-8-91 129522 AMERICAN TELEPHONE L TELEGRAPH f1.259.74 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 129523 A T 1 T 4330.39 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 129524 ACTION ODOR REPAIR CUkF 31.850.4D BUILDING REPAIRS 129525 ACTION RENTALS f.315.1v RENTAL EQUIPMENT 129526 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP $16,323.73 ENGINE SERVICES M.0.11-18-92 129527 AMLRICAN CABLING A COHN f:.281.94 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 129520 AMLRICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 4415.00 SUBSCRIPTION 129529 AMLRICAN MI-LIFT f76.D1 TRUCE PARTS 129530 AMER SOCIETY FOR MICRUBIOLG 547C.40 LAB SUPPLIES 129531 AMICON. INC f629.53 LAB SUPPLIES 129-32 CITY OF ANAHEIM s594.4G TRAINING REGISTRATION 129533 BLARE F ANDERSON f53.84 REIMBURSE CELLULAR TELEPHONE 129534 ANIATER - DISTRIBUTION $342.49 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 129535 ANTHONT•S MECM G MACHINE. INC. f547.6b MECHANICAL REPAIRS 129536 APPLIED 6103TSTEMS INC Sl.332.36 LAB SUPPLIES i29537 ABC LABORATORIES $6"95.0a SERVICE AGREEMENTS 129538 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC $2.851.4b INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129539 AR120NA INSTRUMENT 13,262.03 INSTRUMENT PARTS m 129540 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SLEW. $195.60 WASTE OIL REMOVAL X 129541 ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES 1812.40 LAB SUPPLIES = 129542 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 12.506.95 PAYROLL SERVICES 129543 AWARDS E TROPHIES $51.24 SERVICE AWARDS 129544 BFI PORTABLE SERVICES S115.31 EQUIPMENT RENTAL --1 129545 DKR LANDFILL 4F.id1.TL RESIDUALS REMOVAL M,0.10-9-91 a 129546 BRW SAFETY 6 SUPPLY S1.i68.bb SAFETY SUPPLIES 1 129547 BIG INC. S5.427.18 ELECTRIC PARTS F.+ 129548 BANK OF THE WEST 12,946.31 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION J-23-2 129549 BARCLAYS LAW FUbLISHLRS $240.00 SUBSCRIPTION 129550 BATTERY SPECIALTILS $412.73 BATTERIES 129551 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 14.381.7. LAB SUPPLIES 129552 BELL SECURITY $679.85 TEMPORARY SERVICES - SECURITY 129553 4T BTLLARD INC Si45.19 REPAIR PARTS 129'_54 2IOSAFETV SYSTEMS. INC. f69.97 LAB SUPPLIES 129555 BID TECH NET. INC S325.b2 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129556 bLUE RIBPON INC f4.00.0Y PLUMBING INSPECTION 129557 BON-A-RUES f112.33 TRUCK PARTS 129558 BOOT BARN $72.75 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 129559 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP 144.735.35 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-37-3 129560 HROONS INSTRUMENT DIV. 6688.E2 SCRUBBER PART 129561 BROWN AND CALUWELL CONSULTANTS $9.939.5U ENGINEERING SERVICES 129562 BUDGET JANITORIAL S5.695.6L JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 125563 DUILDER-S LMPORIUM f99.3b HARDWARE/LUMBER 129564 BURKE ENGINEERING CU 156.9b ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 129565 BUSH AND ASSOOIATLS INC SB.36O..0 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-30-92 FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST DONNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/29/93 PALL c ¢ REPORT NUMBER AP43 LOUNIY SANITAIION U1SIMIL7S OF ORANUE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 15/05/93 POSTING DATE b5/OE/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129566 6ARY G STREED 14,901.51 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 229567 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY 1349.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129568 CON BOOKS 5201.9E BOOKS 129569 CEM CORPORATION $533.95 LAB SUPPLIES 1295TO C M i 5451.55 INSTRUMENTS 129571 CAC PRESS INC $52.50 LAB SUPPLIES 329572 CS COMPANY 17.356.6J VALVES 129573 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH IIIC. 5307.75 LAB SUPPLIES 129574 CALTROL INC $378.91 REGULATOR PARTS 129575 CALIF ASSOC OP SAN AUENCIE 17.400.6U TRAINING REGISTRATION 1295T6 CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY FRESS $322.30 LAB SUPPLIES 129577 CARLETON ENGINEEkS $1.272.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 129570 JOHN CAROLED ENUINEERS 100.609.24 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-41, P1-36, P1-34 129579 CENTURY SAFETY INST 6 SUPP 11U.950.16 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129500 CLARK CONSULTANTS 53.840.04 CONSULTING SERVICES 129581 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL MANGLING $500.00 STORAGE UNIT 129582 CLEVELAND COTTON FROG 330.33 LAB SUPPLIES 129583 COLO SPRING HARBOR 1112.32 LAB SUPPLIES 129584 COLIC" AND SUNS 51.669.96S.SU CONSTRUCTION I-9 229585 CON BYTE USA 52.927.ib CABLE SUPPLIES m 129586 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 5770.0E MACHINE PARTS X 129587 COMPUTER BAY 3662.32 OFFICE EQUIPMENT �x+ 129588 COMPUTER OATACOM 180180.1b OFFICE SUPPLIES CC 229589 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL UIST 16,650.66 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 129591 CONSUMER PIPE $ir U41.37 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129591 CON T IRE NT AL CHEMICAL CO 11.bl6.i5 CHLORINE M.O. 10-9-91 Oa 129592 CONTRACTOR'S BOOK STORE S1O0.00 BOOKS N 129593 CONVERSE CONSULTAN75 0 C 16r213.76 CONSULTING SERVICES 129594 CDOREp INOD$T RIPS INL i813.93 ELECTRIC PARTS 129595 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 32U6.b7 TRUCK PARTS 129596 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $760.88 ELECTRIC PARTS 129597 CA DEFT OF HEALTH SERVICES $3.477.66 LAB ACCREDITATION PROGRAM 129596 ONE INC 3456.91 ELECTRIC PARTS 129599 J.Y. D'ANGELO CO INC 1972.98 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129600 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $744.23 TRUCK PARTS 129601 DAPPER TIRE $486.94 TIRES 129602 BE ANZA CORPORATION $159.64 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 129603 DERIN ENTERPRISES INC 1427.46 ELECTRIC PARTS 229604 DEZURIK AND/OR CS C0 89031.62 VALVES 129605 DIAIEC ENVIRONMENTAL 11.891.74 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-12-92 129606 DICKSONS S..b98.i4 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS 129607 DIFILIFPO ASSOCIATES S1r414.98 PRINTING 129608 DIGITAL EQUIPMENI CORP aZ5.252.0 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 129609 DISPOSAL CONTNUL SERVICC IN S2.188.50 TOPIC WASTE DISPOSAL 129610 DOkADO ENTERPRISES INC S895.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 129611 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY f.r a46.60 ELEVATOR REPAIRS F� 10 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL C PROCESSING DATAP4,/Z9/93 FAOL 3 l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COON IV CLAIMS PAID ub/05/93 POSTING DATE E5/65/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129612 DRESSER MEASUREMENT 3b.158.76 METER REPAIRS 129613 DUNN EDWARDS COPP 323b.02 PAINT SUPPLIES 129614 DURO-SENSE CORP 5749.94 MECHANICAL PARTS 129615 D-VALS SALES 3204.9b FITTINGS 129616 EIM CO/NSS SUPPLY s2.903.86 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129617 EMA SERVICES INC 583b.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2 129610 ESP NORTH S214.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129619 EASTMAN INC S3.i10.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129620 ECOANALYSIS INC 32.313.bb OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 129621 ELECT AIR TOOL CO 354.LD CONVEYOR PART 129622 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES 13.b80.6C ENGINEERING SERVICES 129623 ENCHANTER INC 35.040.64 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 129624 ESSCO PUMPS AND CONTROLS $1083.26 PUMP PARTS 129625 ENVIRONMENTAL FROG. USA $1,333.41 TRUCE PARTS 129626 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC $98.5L LAB SUPPLIES 129627 ENVIROTECH CONTROLS INC $112.99 OPERATING SUPPLIES 129628 ENEMIES INC $35.00 FITTINGS 129629 ESSENCE GROUP $1.180.16 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 129630 CHARLES EVANS L ASSOC. 158.044.U6 CONSULTING SERVICES 129631 FMC CORPORATION 4160.0E LAB SUPPLIES X 129632 FIT SAND AND GRAVEL INC 3150.IV ROAD BASE Z 129633 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 35.200.0D RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 129634 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 3932.25 AIR FREIGHT UU 129635 FERNELLGAS $27.2. PROPANE 129636 FISCHER L PORTER CO 3�.506.76 CHLORINATION PARTS 129637 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 3:.311.tl5 LAB SUPPLIES F 129638 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. s246.GC CONCRETE CUTTING I 129639 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC 3406.63 HARDWARE W 129640 FOSS MARITIME CO $838.74 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129641 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMLRA 361.07 FILM 129642 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT sl.(,87.71 PAINT SUPPLIES 129643 THE FOXBORO CO 31.673.L: INSTRUMENT PARTS 129644 FREEDOM IMAGING $63.85 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129645 UST, INC. 5253.21 COMPUTER REPAIRS 129646 GANAHL LUMBER C0 $118.60 LUMBER 129647 4ARRA01-CALLAHAN COMPANY 397C.93 CHEMICALS 129648 GENERAL BINDING CORP s293.91 BINDING SERVICES 129649 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $739.8; ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 129650 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $207.69 TELEPHONE SERVICES 129651 GIERLICH-MIICHLLL INC $1.120.66 MECHANICAL PARTS 129652 N 6LAN7Z a SON $565.67 BUILDING MATERIALS 129653 GOODVAY TOOLS CORP. 1.40.74 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES ,. 129654 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUIOkS 6.77.43 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 129655 THOMAS GRAY A ASSOC INC s648.00 LAB SERVICES 129656 DON GREEM L ASSOCIAILS S.55.Gu SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-30-92 129657 MSG TECHNOLOGY $114.906.42 CONSTRUCTION P2-44 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST VORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/29/93 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMULR AP13 LWUN7V SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID '.3/05/93 POSTING DAIL C5/05/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESLRIPTION 129658 MACH COMPANY $842.39 LAB SUPPLIES 129659 GEORGE I HALL CU 6283.38 ELECTRIC PARTS 129660 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC 11.154.41 FITTINGS 129661 SIM J HARRIS CO 559.I23.00 FIBRE OPTIC SYSTEM INSTALL .M.0.8-12-92 129662 HATCH S KIRK INC $3,411.75 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129663 HAVWARO BAKER $24.980.04 CONSULTING SERVICES 129664 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES 11.548.4G TEMPORARY SERVICES 129665 HEWLETT PACKARO $727.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129666 HILTI INC $64.67 BATTERY CHARGER 129667 RE HUGHES CO INC $1,243.54 PAINT SUPPLIES 129660 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER S1A $56.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129669 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINh C $246.37 BICYCLE PARTS 129670 HUNT'S FINAL fHASL S;:.S25.LL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 129671 ISC S2.169.00 ELECTRIC SERVICES 129672 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL Se3m2V.27 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-I8-92 129673 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1,233.73 CONNECTORS 129674 INGRAM PAPER S933.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129675 FACTEL TELETRAC 4i29.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 129676 INTER37ATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1,064.17 BATTERIES fYl 129677 ISOLA8. INC S.01.87 LAB SUPPLIES >C 12967B GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUfP $643.49 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES .2 129679 JAYS CATERING $177.79 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE 229600 JOHNSTONE SUFFLY $2.107.59 ELECTRIC PARTS 129681 KAMAN UEARINGS C SUPPLY SG5b.74 MECHANICAL PARTS 129662 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $349.28 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 229683 KEYE PRODUCTIVITY CENTER 5250.U4 TRAINING REGISTRATION n 129684 KING BEARING INC $1,601.72 MACHINE SUPPLIES R 129685 KNOT INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2,045.47 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129686 KROHNE AMER IC INC 1327.00 METER 129687 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO 1136.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129688 LEE 6 RO CONSULTING ENGH 31.203.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5 129689 LEWCO ELECTRIC CO 5211.13 TRUCK SUPPLIES 12969C LIGUIO AIR CORF $570.73 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129691 SOCO-LYNCH CORP 11.135.92 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129692 NBC AFPLIED LNVIRONMLNTAL 1933.33 OCEAN MONITORING 129693 MFS 3302.11 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 129694 MACOMCO 5719.98 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129695 MANTLK 1284.33 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 129696 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $10.22 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129691 MATT - CHLOR INC 1499.39 CHLORINATION PARTS 129698 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKLIS $9.091.23 COP REMARKETING AGREEMENT 129699 MICROAGE OF CERRITOS 00.68 COMPUTER PARTS 129700 MIDWAY MFG S MACHINlh4 $725.00 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 129701 MILTON ROY CU $598.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS 229702 MISSION ABRASIVE SUFPLILi $199.19 MECHANICAL PARTS 129703 MISSION INDUSTRIES $4,724.92 UNIFORM RENTALS 10 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL REP OAT SNUN B DATAP43/.9193 PAGE 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COON FT CLAIMS PAID 45/C5/93 POSTING DATE CS/GS/93 WARRANT NO. VENUOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129704 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO 1571.4I INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129705 MONTGOMERY LAHORATURILS $3.495.25 LAB SERVICES 1297C6 MORGAN CRANE CO INC 14,383.69 TRUCK PARTS 1297CT MORRISON S FOERSIER $811.08 LEGAL SERVICES 229700 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 1191.18 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 129709 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CENTE $119.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 129710 CITY OF NEVPORT BEACH 13T.V0 WATER USE 129711 01 CORPORATION s3.660.G0 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129712 OCCUFATIONAL VISION SERVICES 5146.92 SAFETY GLASSES 129713 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIUA RES 18.669.59 OFFICE FURNITURE 129714 DX SYSTEMS CD 126.511.13 CHLORINE M.0.30-9-91 129715 OLYMPIC PARTY SALES 1120.68 LR SUPPLIES 12971E ORANGE COUNTY AUTO FAA75 C 158.9E TRUCK PARTS 129719 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO 335323.25 CHEMICALS 129719 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SU PF LT C $534.00 F EMICALS 129720 ORANGE COURIER .339.00 FREIGHT 129721 ORANGE SERVICE a FITTING CO. $6.399.4E FITTINGS 129722 OXYGEN SERVICE 221333.18 SPECIALTY GASSES 129722 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT f333.1V WORKERS COMP DISTRIBUTION 129723 COUNTY INSTRUMENT DISTRICT $6,249.50 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT RT 129725 PFT INSTRUMENT CO 36.299.50 ENGINE REPAIRS = 129726 PAC SCILUTIFICSECHAN CORPORATION f329.14 LAB SUPPLIES 12972E PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY sao.04 TOOL 129728 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO f953.47 SAFETY SE SERVICES 12972E PACIFIC BELL f646.85 TELEPHONE SBRVI C69 129730 PACIFIC WALK-IN MEDICAL 3$69.40 MEDICAL BEAMS D 129731 PACIFIC RATER SYSTEMS C 954.79 RENTAL EQUIPMENT ! 129732 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 115 395.33 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MOOIPICATIONS In 129733 PAD%! JANITORIAL SUPP f395.35 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129734 PIMMIN GELM E0. TEMPON ANION .775.55 LAB SUPPLIES 129735 PIMA GAO SYSTEMS INC it S4$196.5, RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 129736 PITNEY BORES CREDIT HARDWARE i194.23 POSTWAR MACHINE LEASE 12973E PLAINS TRUEVALUE HA0.DYARE 117.23 HARDWARE 129738 PLASTIC IND USTRTLS S164.34 SETTLES 129739 POLYMETRIC INCINC. f3.136•US SSRVICE AGREEMENT 129740 POWER IN f21.333.81 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 129741 POWER ELLCTRO SUPPLY [O 1a15.90 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 129742 HEWER SYSTEMS 1155.39 ice PARTS 129742 HROCES PRIMROSE ICE ,845.02 ICE 129744 PROCESS NALEQUIPMENT SERVICE COMPANY 51.045.42 PUMP PARTS 129744 PROFESSIONAL SOLUTIONS IND. $4,464.00 SOIL TESTING 129746 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 14.464.00 IOMPUTER SERVICES INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 12974E RAN COMPUTER SERVICES INC 5131433.60 COMPUTER SBRVI CES 129748 RAIN IN INSTRUMENT CO 1433.60 LAB SUPPLIES 229749 RD SYSTEMS INC 31.995.0E SECURITY CARD READER 129T99 0.E0 VINE SHOES s124.13 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES FUND NO 9199 Y JT GIST NUPK1.14 CAPITAL PROCESSING WAIL 1/29/93 PALL E ALPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION UISIHICTS OP ORANGE COJNIV CLAIMS PAID LB/65/93 PUaTIM6 LATE 65/15/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPIIUN 129750 REDI EXPRESS $169.20 MESSENGER SERVICES 129751 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUFPLY $8.253.83 FITTINGS 129752 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CORP 1113.22 LAB SUPPLIES 129753 RESTFK CORP s1.598.12 LAB SUPPLIES 129754 ROBINSON FERTILIZER CO s2ab21.12 CHEMICALS 129755 ROSEMOUNT/UN1L.0 s1.914.78 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129756 JOSEPH T RYERSON 6 SON IN $1,160.18 METAL 129757 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP $6.369.77 PARTS CLEANER 129158 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $7,918.85 LAB SUPPLIES 129759 DOUG SARVIS $1.125.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 129760 SEA COAST DESIGNS $1.230.50 OFFICE FURNITURE 129761 UTY OF SEAL PEACH 11.284.70 WATER USE 129762 SHAMROCK SUPPLY Se96.9u ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1297E3 JOSEPH SHOPP $565.39 VEHICLE DAMAGE 129164 SHURELUCK SALES $11.075.64 FITTINGS 129765 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO $133.13 LAB SUPPLIES 129766 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL LLI S861.06 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 129767 SO COAST AIR QUALITY 5,093.BC PERMIT FEES 129768 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $3.2.853.78 POWER 129769 SO CAL GAS CO $2,615.66 NATURAL GAS X229770 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL LO $41.832.49 DIESEL FUEL = 129771 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO INC 513.730.55 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129772 STAMEN Z SPASSOFF PE 52.S20.uG ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-1 p0 129773 SPEAKER SUPPORT $381.44 PRESENTATION AIDS 129774 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC s509.73 PLUI®ING SUPPLIES --1 129775 SPEX INDUSTRIES INC 11,174.91 LAB SUPPLIES ]a 129776 ETANCO.S VACUUM SERVCE $3.786.70 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 129777 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION s29.12 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL CT 129778 SUMMIT STEEL 11/9.bC METAL 229779 SUNSET FORD $329.81 TRUCK PARTS 129780 SUR-LITE CORPORATION 5.5.603.25 GAS PLANE REPAIRS 129781 TAYLOR-DUNN MPG COMPANY 136C.61 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 129762 TEKDRAULICS $7.929.68 PUMP PARTS _. 129783 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 423.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129784 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5253.95 MACHINE SUPPLIES 129785 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. 1465.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129186 70SHIBA INTERNATIONAL 61.120.65 ELECTRIC PARTS 129787 TRANF 1.37..3 VALVES 129788 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES 52.390..6 TRAVEL SERVICES 129769 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY INC $1.890.49 TRUCK PARTS 129790 URISA 590.0G MEMBERSHIP DUES 129791 UVT . INC $86.15 LAB SUPPLIES 129792 UHLER, INC s1 i3.600.93 CONSTRUCTION 5-32, 5-33 129793 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 551.72 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129794 UNOCAL $191.31 UNLEADED GASOLINE 129795 UNITED PARCEL SEkV10E s411.02 PARCEL SERVICES q 10 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ■ FROCESSING UA7L 4/29/93 PALL 1 (. RLFORI NU%eLR AP4. ` LOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAIU O5/05/93 PUSTING UATE 0/05/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129796 UNITFO FARCLL SERVICE 5915.UL UPS DEPOSIT 129797 US DEFT OF COMMLRLE NTT $19.50 PUBLICATION 229790 VOC TESTING 92.500.00 AQMD TEST 129799 VWR SCIEN/IFlC 55.912.13 LAB SUPPLIES 129600 VALLEY CITICS SUPPLY CO $148.43 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129861 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUME6TS $3.159.60 LAB SUPPLIES 1299O2 VAR34N ASSOCIATES INC 58.889.11 LAB SUPPLIES 129803 VILLAGE NURSCRIES 5101.11 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 129904 WESTERN FEDERAL INC 5243.25 LAB SUPPLIES 129405 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUFPLY $16,343.35 CAUBTIC BOOR. M.O.8-12-92 129006 JOHN WILCY 8 SONS INC $187.76 BOOK 129007 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES Si.489.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-31 129908 ALMOA CORP $17.[71.30 COPIER LEASES 129809 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $1,146.04 LAB SUPPLIES 229810 ZUAN INOUSTRIES $1.538.96 ELECTRIC PARTS ----------------- 107AL CLAIMS FAIR C5/05193 S3.b8 LWV9.53 r�lX BVMMARY AMOUNT 01 OPEN FUND 9,009.70 W 02 OPEN FUND 12, 3. 02 CAP PAC FUND ,083.94 03 OPEN FUND 52,146.22 m 95 93 CAP FAC FUND 952.47 1 95 OPEN FUND 8,041.59 V 05 CAP PAC FUND 56,438.92 06 OPER FUND 1,057.70 07 OPER FUND 11,075.84 07 CAP FAC FUND 269.37 012 OPEN FUND 12,102.28 013 OPEN FUND 601.64 014 OPEN FUND 793.58 0566 OPER FUND , .5 0566 CAP FAC FUND 148,544.55 328 0667 OPER FUND 25.26 07614 OPEN FUND 61.41 JT OPEN FUND 144,997.41 MAT 2,144,856.44 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FU 6,996.29 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL ------------------- 3,587,609.53 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PRVCESSINU BATE 5/13/93 PAUL 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAIU G5/19/93 POSTING DATE 65/19/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129637 AG TECH COMPANY 157.031.93 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 129838 A I L 1 64.540.78 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 129839 A 6 V DRILLING INC. $1.407.66 CONCRETE SERVICES 129N50 ACCESSORIE AIR COMPRESSOR S 6248.56 ELEC RIC SUPPLIES 129841 ACLU-LABS RESEARCH INC 1190.C4 LAB SERVICES 229842 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES 5913.24 LAB SUPPLIES 129843 AIR FRODUCTS 1 CHEMICAL IN 634.bb4.CO O&M AGREEMENT OKY. GEN SYST M.0.8-9-89 129844 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CU LTD 522.920.63 HAHHOLE COVERS 129845 ALLIED SUPPLY CO $6.68 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129P06 AMERSHAM CORP $224.34 LAB SUPPLIES 129847 AMRESCO. INC $197.6. LAB SUPPLIES 129048 ANDATACU SB12.96 LAB SUPPLIES 129849 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL 690.U6 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129850 ANTHONY'S MECH 6 MALMINE. INC. S316.4D MECHANICAL REPAIRS 129051 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $406.45 NOTICES 6 ADS 129852 APPLIED PIOSYSTEMS INC S147.288.13 LAB SUPPLIES 129853 ABC LABORATORIES 51.175.0E LAB SERVICES 129559 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $603.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129855 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $780.0U WASTE OIL REMOVAL 129856 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD 1 5839.5a CONCRETE SERVICES m 129857 RANOOLFH AUSTIN CO 5659.10 LAB SUPPLIES X 129958 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 53.176.75 PAYROLL SERVICES ._-. 129059 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC $46.55 TRUCK PARTS OO 129860 URN LANUFILL 12.708.43 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.10-9-91 129861 URN SAFETY 8 SUFILY - 11.624.96 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129862 HACHARACH INC 114C.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS pO 129963 BANANA BLUEPRINT 511.978.86 BLUSPRINTING SERVICES 1 129864 BARCLAYS LAW PUbLISMLRS 514.99 FREIGHT 129065 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS THE SL4 276.25 LAB SUPPLIES 129066 bLLLCO GLASS. INC. 13.913.8E LAB SUPPLIES 129867 HEN2 ENGINEERING INC S2.119.5: COMPRESSOR PARTS 129868 OIOMERIEUA VITEK INC 1439.89 LAB SUPPLIES 129669 BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS. INC. 481.55 LAB SUPPLIES 129970 810 TECH NET, INC 673.76 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129871 BISHOP COMPANY Sb26.49 TOOLS 129872 BUEHRINWCR MANNHEIM 197W.45 LAB SUPPLIES 129673 BOISE CASCADE UFC FRUUUCTS $1,101.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129974 BON-A-RUES $719.1C TRUCK PARTS 129875 BORLAND INTERHAIIONAL 179.95 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 129676 BOYLE EN6IREERINO COMP 61.881.17 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-19 129877 BRINUER50N CUPS f21 atl1.UO PLUMBING SERVICES 129878 HU66LT JANITORIAL Sa.b50.iro JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129879 BUILOLR•S EMPOPIUM 5160.3. HARDWARE 129000 VARY 6 STREEO Sa.42b.57 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 129H81 C M 1 19.190.38 INSTRUMENT 129882 CRC PRESS INC S65.0C PUBLICATIONS ' 10 9199 - JT DIST VLRKING CAPITAL ( REPDETSNUM BERING DATE 5/13/93 IAOL 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 65/19/93 POSTING DATE ES/19/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129SP3 CS COMPANY $7,495.87 VALVES 129884 CALTROL INC 51.762.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129885 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC 1549.13 TRUCK REPAIRS 129886 CALIF. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS 13.699.11 FITTINGS 129887 CALIFORNIA GLASS S METAL 1140.4Q DOOR REPAIRS 129868 CALIFORNIA SUPRESSION SYSTLM 149b.45 CABLE 129RR9 CAL4S CAMERAS AND VIULO 144.76 CAMERA REPAIRS 129890 CAPITAL WESTWARU 52.822.7b GAUGE 129891 CENTREPUINT COMMERCIAL TNT $1,777.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129692 CENTURY SAFELY INST S SUPP a530.74 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129693 CETAC TECHNOLOGIES INC $44.85 PUMP 129094 CHROME CRANKSHAFT INC 1555.60 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 129E95 CIRCUIT INDUSTRIES a631.6b USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 129R96 CITY WIRE CLOTH INC 1L4.2L FREIGHT 129697 COAST PIPE EQUIPMENT 5501.87 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129098 COASTAL CHLORINATION 1240.OL WATER SYSTEM CHLORINATION 129099 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO 52.004.91 LAB EQUIPMENT 129960 CONFUSA. INC. 13050.1,5 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 129901 COMPUSEPVL 194.31 COMPUTER SERVICES m 129902 CONNELL GM FARTS / DIV 174.48 TRUCK PARTS X 129903 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $3.755.02 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 129904 CONSOLIDATED IREI6HTWAYS 41,110.15 FREIGHT bO 129905 CONTINENTAL AIM TOOLS INC SL91.73 TOOLS 1299C6 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C 11.349.88 SOILS REPORT --1 129907 CONVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL WEST $500.00 PERMIT FEE REFUND b0 129908 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC 5156.4E ELECTRIC PARTS 1 129909 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 11tl9.92 TRUCK PARTS N 129910 COSTAR CORP $101.29 LAB SUPPLIES 129921 COUD TV WHOLESALE ELECTRIC as 2.55 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 129912 CRANE VEYOR CORP 5158.32 PIPE 129913 DAILY PILOT 1105.60 NOTICES 6 ADS 129914 DAPPER TIRE 4437.17 TIRES 129915 DE ANZA CORPOh AT16N $150.LJ EQUIPMENT RENTALS 129916 DELTA TECH SERVICE INC sLT,586.25 FILTER TEST SERVICES 129911 UEZURIK ANTI/UR CS CU 0763.24 VALVE PARTS 129918 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 1.027.5e ANIONIC POLYMER H.O. 8-12-92 129919 UICKSONS 1859.95 APPLIANCES 129920 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP SSOL.LU TRAINING REGISTRATION 129921 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN 11.316.89 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 129922 OURAOO ENTERPRISES INC 116.764.4C PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 129923 DRESSER MEASUREMENT 1/89.05 FREIGHT 129924 POBEkT F DRIVER ASSOC 178...E INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 129925 DUNN EDWARDS CUPP 11.640.4E PAINT SUPPLIES 129926 ESP NORTH S:.g6..G7 HARDWARE 129927 EASTMAN INC a4.566.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129928 ELECT AIR TOOL CO $152.7. CONVEYOR PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/1!/93 FAGL 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAIR G5/19/93 POSTING DAIS L5/19/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129929 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES 14,346.00 ELECTRICAL CONSULTING 129930 ENCHANTER INC f4.OB0.E[ OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 129931 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOUXCE ASSUC 316G.56 LAB SERVICES 129932 EST SAND AND 6kAVEL INC 4265.3, ROAD BASE 129933 MARSHALL FAIRRES s12B.LB DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129934 FALCOU DISPOSAL SERVICE S4r680.dC RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 129935 FEDERAL EXPRESS COkF $852.49 AIR FREIGHT 129936 FERRELL6AS 1122.56 PROPANE 12993T FILTERLINE CORF 1448.7J CHLORINATION PARTS 129938 FILTER SUPPLY CO 11.496.24 MECHANICAL PARTS 129939 FISCHER P PORTER CO 1556.31 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 129940 FLAT AIIO VERTICAL INC. W225.OL CONCRETE CUTTING 129941 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $122.7b FILM 129942 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 51.865.00 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS FEE 129943 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $691.44 PAINT SUPPLIES 129944 THE FOXBORO CO $2,360.96 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 229945 GET. INC. $13,300.93 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129946 GAMAHL LUMBER CU $711.9, LUMBER 129947 GENERAL TELEPHONE CU 54.354.L. TELEPHONE SERVICES Ell 129948 GIERLICH-MIICHELL INC 3.7.017.11 PUMP PARTS X 129949 GILSON MEDICAL ELECTRONICS 1132.94 LAB SUPPLIES = 129950 N GLANTZ a SON $624.11 SIGN SUPPLIES 229951 GOVERNMENT INSTITUTES INC s198.UJ SUBSCRIPTION ITS 129952 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $3b2.4: FILM 129953 DON GREEM L ASSOCIATES 3975.L•L SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 129954 HACK COMFANY 315i.15 BOILER PARTS trJ 229955 FRED A HARPER $1,500.66 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 229956 HAULAY AY CONTAINERS 31.894.4E CONTAINER RENTALS W 129951 FL HAW11 GO INC S7.111.99 AIR FILTERS 129950 HELLO $61.77 TELEPHONE SUPPLIES 129959 HELPMATES PERSONNEL SERVICES SI.032.00 TEMPORARY SERVICES 1299EG HOME CONTROLS DIY/MORE, INC. 3492.eB VALVES 129961 PS HUGHES CU INC $1,924.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129962 HUNTER CORPORATION S1b4.866.3L CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 129963 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA l646.5. OFFICE SUPPLIES 129964 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY 5436.b2 HARDWARE 129965 HUNTiN6TON VALLEY SCHWINA C $32.3C BICYCLE PARTS 129966 HUNT-S FINAL PHASE 33020.OG DOOR INSTALLATION 129967 ISC 31.246.JG INSTRUMENT SERVICES 229966 IMPERIAL WEST CHLMICAL l72.868.2G FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 129969 INUUSTkIAL THREAUEU FRODUCTS 11.03.02 CONNECTORS 129976 INGRAM PAPER l30.97 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 229971 INSTITUTE FOR SCIENTIFIC INFU S3G1.76 LAB SUPPLIES 129972 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS S1.G06.75 BATTERIES - 129973 JLA CREDIT CURE $145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 129974 JAYS CATERING $503.20 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE 10 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL \ PROCESSING DATE 5/13/93 PAGE 4 . \\\ REP OKI NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID l.5/19/93 POSTING DATE 03/19/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT UESCRIP71ON 129975 JIM•S SUSPENSION SERVICE s50.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 129976 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $1,433.93 ELECTRIC PARTS 129977 JONES LHEMICALS INC $2.639.14 CHEMICALS 129978 THE KEITH COMPANIES $14,000.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-35 129979 MING NEARING INC 5190.14 MACHINE SUPPLIES 129980 THE KNOX COMPANY 5218.05 BECURITY SYSTEM PARTS 129981 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUFPLILS Si.759.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129982 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE LD 550.94 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES L29983 LAB SAFETY SOFTLY CO $415.97 PUMP PARTS 129984 LEGI-7ECH 1320.0P COMPUTER SERVICES 129905 LEE S RU CONSULTING THOR 122 A6S.la ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5 129986 LORAIN PRODUCTS $1.251.34 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129987 MFS 5357.11 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 129980 NO$ INSPECTION INC SZ62.2b TESTING SERVICES 129989 MACOMCO $837.16 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 129990 MANLEY•S BOILER RLPAIR CO. INC sI.923.b4 BOILER REPAIRS 129991 MARVAC ELECTRONICS S4A2.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129992 MATT - CHLOR INC $531.53 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 129993 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO 5259.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES m 129994 TIES COMPANY S2C010.55 BELT PRESS REPAIRS X 129995 MIDLAND MFG CORP 3726.38 CHLORINATION PARTS = 129996 MIDWAY MFG 6 MACHINING s2.]71.13 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 129997 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $246.49 HARDWARE 129998 MISSION INDUSTRIES $3.070.55 UNIFORM RENTALS 129999 MLAO FN BUNi1CH CONSTRUCTION s145.590.U3 CONSTRUCTION 2-30 130000 TOM MOORE 38.655.R. CONSULTING SERVICES P2-44 CA 134001 MORTON SALT AND/OR 5465.41 SALT rt 130002 NASCO WEST INC s:98.:] LAB SUPPLIES 1300C3 NATIONIL SAFETY COUNCIL s184.75 SAFETY FILM RENTALS 130004 NEW MERMES INC 1309.68 HARDWARE 130005 NEW HORIZONS COMPUTER CLWIL 31.240.4V TRAINING REGISTRATION 130006 NORTHWLb TERN CARBON sa.25O.31 CHEMICALS 130007 01 CORFORA710N $264.73 LAB SUPPLIES 1300CS UK SVSTEMS CO SE9'340.V9 CHLORINE H.0.10-9-91 130069 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SOFTLY C $808.13 CHEMICALS 130010 ORANGE VALVE L P1ITINW CO. $739.29 FITTINGS 1311C11 OXYGEN SERVICE $64.65 SPECIALTY GASES 130012 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 312.SDb.12 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT 13C013 PACIFIC PARTS 114.732.9G OFFICE SUPPLIES 136014 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 31.33i.1U SAFETY SUPPLIES 130015 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C 566.44 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 13D016 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 5155.7: TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 130017 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPP 4A.521.95 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 130018 PA4ENET $99.5. PAGER RENTALS 1BCO19 PAK WEST S430.97 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 230020 PALMIERI. TYLER. WIENER, 11.756.3L LEGAL SERVICES 14-1-IA FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 6/13/93 PAGE 5 NLPOMI. NUMBER AP43 CUUNIW SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS IAID t`u/19/93 POSTING DATE u5/19/93 WARRANT NO. VENODA AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 130021 P.F. PAULUS, INC $21,172.26 UTILITY LOCATION SERVICES 130022 ROW PENDERGRAFI A4bC.Wt DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 13CO23 FERFORMANCE ANALYTICAL $2,063.64 AIR ANALYSIS 130024 VERMIN-ELMER CORPORATION 11.419.89 LAB SUPPLIES 130025 F'EROMIDAIION SYSTEMS INC 544.510.51 CHEMICALS 13CO26 PIMA GNU SYSTEMS INC 61.3.352.3E RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 130027 POLYPURE INC !{4.ltl T.tl9 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 130028 POLYSPEDE 64i9.B3 ELECTRIC PARTS 130029 POWER FUMFS INC S5T1.34 PUMP PARTS 130030 P'RINCETON SEPARATIONS 196.5G LAB SUPPLIES 130031 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1959.34 PUMP PARTS 230032 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE ❑10. $4. 78C.Ci SOIL TESTING 130033 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. P4.9.0.ud INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 230634 PULSAFEEDER 5976.43 PUMP PARTS 130035 QUALITY BUILDING SUPPLY $83.72 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 130036 RGF ENTERPRISES Si43.21 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 130D37 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO S1r569.41 TRASH REMOVAL 130030 RAMCO INC 16.736.42 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 130039 RED VALVE CO INC 5418.5C VALVES 130040 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY S..ee6.9. PLUMBING SUPPLIES X 130041 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CORP $831.15 LAB SUPPLIES = 130042 RESTER COMP $72.97 LAB SUPPLIES 130043 RICH COLOR LAB 6tlu.bl PRINTING trl 130044 ROB02 SURGICAL INSTRUMENT C 1126.0u LAB SUPPLIES 130C45 ROSEMOUNT INC. SG22.% INSTRUMENT 130C46 OON R. RDTH 5213.8a DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF GG 136047 ARNOLD S RUMMELSBURG. C.E. $2.803.bb ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.1-20-93 1 130040 JOSEPH T RYERSON 8 SON IN S63..29 METAL CPT 130C49 S.S. MECHANICAL $8,450.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 130056 SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA $190.3+ SAFETY SUPPLIES 130PS1 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $2,620.96 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 136G52 SANWA LANK 110.631.0C CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30 130053 DOUG SARVIS $975.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 13G054 SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS 1.72.21 LAB SUPPLIES 13C055 SHAMROCK SUPPLY Sb58.04 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 136056 SHURLLUCR GALLS $7.670.29 HARDWARE 13C057 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 127,543.37 POWER 130050 SO CAL GAS CO C13.593.25 NATURAL GAS 130059 SOUTHERN COUNTILS OIL Cu 5.4.630.75 DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 13U060 SFARBLLTTS URINMIBG WATER S..403.89 WATER/COOLER RENTALS 136061 STAMEN 2 SPASSOFF FL 15.040.0" ENGINEERING SERVICES M.O.3-11-92 130062 WESTPLLUV INC 3215..0 WELDING SUPPLIES 136063 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC $275.63 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 130064 SPEC TECH INC 6183.21 WELDING SUPPLIES 130065 SPLA INUUSTAIES INC 5713.bb LAB SUPPLIES 136066 STANG INDUSTRIAL PRODS. 1672.70 PLUMBING PARTS 1� 10 9199 - JT GIST VORKING CAPITAL FROCESSING DATE 5/13196 MGL 6 \\\ REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID C5/19/93 POSTING DATE us/19/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 130067 STENMERS TREE SERVICE $11,200.00 TREE REMOVAL G TRIMMING 130068 STERLING ART 57.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 130069 SUMMIT STEEL $665.24 STEEL L30070 SUPELCO INC 4805.92 LAB SUPPLIES 1300T1 STMANTEC CORP 520.97 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 130972 TEKONAULICS $312.23 PUMP PARTS 130073 CHARLES E TMOMAS S12C.46 TRUCK PARTS 13 D074 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 5496.47 MACHINE SUPPLIES 130015 TONV,S LUCK 6 SAFE SERVICE $327.95 SECURITY SERVICES 130076 TOWNE CREATIVE SERVICES 5540.44 PRINTING 130077 INANE S526.0: VALVES 130078 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES 3110.00 TRAVEL SERVICES 130079 TREBYR ELECTRONICS 4633.3E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 130080 TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY INC $915.66 TRUCK PARTS BOOR/ TRUESOAIL LABS 42,4C0.6, LAB SERVICES 1l0082 Jf. TUCKER L SON INC $649.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1SOOB3 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC 49b.6G LAB SUPPLIES 13CO04 UNOCAL 5174.9: UNLEADED GASOLINE 130085 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5201.Li PARCEL SERVICES m 130086 UNIVERSITY OF HAVAII $12.971.67 WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE X 13G08T VYR SCIENTIFIC $1.170.45 LAB SUPPLIES S 130060 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $3.959.54 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 130089 VAN WATER L ROGERS $700.36 CHEMICALS 130090 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 51,659.21 LAB SUPPLIES 1 130091 VERNE-S PLUNGING 5135.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 130092 WALKER RICHER L QUINN INC $7,356.55 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1 136093 VERB ENGINEERING 1,802.3G EQUIPMENT REPAIRS C71 13G094 WEST COAST ANALYIICAL SAW 4510.Ou LAB SUPPLIES 130095 WEST COAST TERMINALS INC 4186.66 OFFICE REPAIRS 130096 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS IN 4371.74 TRUCK PARTS 130097 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPFLV 426.351.34 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92 130096 ROURKE L WOODRUFF A SPRAULIN $40,130.92 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-39-92 130099 XEROX CORP 55.809.39 COPIER LEASES ,. 130100 RICHARD B EDGAR $200.66 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID L5/19/93 $1,732,330.1U a cae ess ac css essay FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 5/13/93 PAGE 7 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY EPORT NUMBER AP43 CLAIMS PAID 05/19/93 POSTING DATE 05/19/93 SUMMARY AMOUNT it OPEN FUND $500.00 42 OPER FUND $12,067.78 82 CAP FAC FUND i146,166.82 A3 OPEN FUND $23,295.69 A3 CAP PAC FUND $2,B38.96 05 OPER FUND i594.50 A5 CAP FAC FUND $10,900.19 i6 OPER FUND $26.34 R7 OPSR FUND $5,606.42 i7 CAP FAC FUND 12,91375 ill OPER FUND i115:989:41 ill CAP FAC FUND $119.40 i14 CAP FAC FUND $1,762.35 52.70 p556 CAPRPACNFUND $128.68 R667 OPER FUND $2,702.18 i7614 OPEN FUND $7,082.40 JT OPEN FOND $606 246.31 COST i522:443.60 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $12,508.12 n'I JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $158,466.00 X $1,532,310.10 W trJ V STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on 19E3 was duly posted for public inspection at t e main n lobby of the Districts - offices on 19,?3. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 19�. Penny Kyle, si nt Secretary o each of the Boarft of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 , 11, 13 & 14 of Orange County, California F27A.1