Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-05-12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA R.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 �/ o.yY• 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 '"IIIHII ""ce cW (714)962-2411 May 6, 1993 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1. 2. 3. S. 6. 7. 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY MAY 12, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Califomia The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. Assistant li a d e cretary Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 19th, at 5:30 p.m. SPECIAL JOINT WORKS - Wednesday, May 26th, at 4:30 p.m. SELECTION COMMITTEE RE (immediately preceding the Executive OCEAN MONITORING Committee meeting) EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE/ - Wednesday, May 26th, at 5:30 p.m. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE PERSONNEL COMMITTEE - Thursday, May 27th, at 5:30 p.m. ENGINEERING AND - Wednesday, June 2nd, at 5:30 p.m. CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10044 ELLIS AVENUE PO.BOX 0127 - MWAIN VALLEY,"LIFORNIA 9212� P141 98 2-24 11 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings May May 12, 1993 May 26, 1993 June Jun 09, 1993 Jun 23, 1993 July Jul 14, 1993 Jul 28, 1993 August Aug 11, 1993 None Scheduled September Sep 08, 1993 Sep 22, 1993 October Oct 13, 1993 Oct 27, 1993 November Nov 10, 1993 None Scheduled December Dec 08, 1993 None Scheduled January Jan 12, 1994 Jan 26, 1994 February Feb 09, 1994 Feb 23, 1994 March Mar 09, 1994 Mar 23, 1994 April Apr 13, 1994 Apr 27, 1994 May May 11, 1994 May 25, 1994 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue C of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 9272E-0127 Telephone: (714)962.2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING MAY 12, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (4) EACH DISTRICT Annual election of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tem of the Boards: (a) District 1 (b) District 2 (c) District 3 (d) District 5 (a) District 6 (f) District 7 (g) District 11 (h) District 13 (i) District 14 (5) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (6) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. 05/12/93 (7) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These D reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager Ic) Report of General Counsel (8) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - April 14, 1993 regular District 2 - April 14, 1993 regular District 3 - April 14, 1993 regular District 5 - April 14, 1993 regular District 6 - April 14, 1993 regular District 7 - April 14, 1993 regular District 11 - April 14, 1993 regular District 13 - April 14, 1993 regular District 14 - April 14, 1993 regular (9) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See pages "A" and "B" 40 /07/93 04 21 9 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - S 956,513.63 $630,705.82 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,087,962.84 529,701.49 Joint Working Capital Fund - 131,944.79 123,995.89 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 8,033.69 30,169.91 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 427.97 52.51 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 26,457.32 79,681.69 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 18,672.11 22,146.81 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 256,915.82 20,767.24 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 292.61 48.49 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 41,914.99 20,910.08 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 461.19 924.10 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 95.61 .00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 39,938.96 333.83 DISTRICTS NOS 5 & 6 JOINT - 28,365.75 53.64 DISTRICTS NOS 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,285.88 .00 DISTRICTS NOS 7 & 14 JOINT - 9,650.54 302.61 53.609.933.70 $1.459.794.11 - -2- 05/12/93 (10) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 1o(a) THROUGH 10(c) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Purchase of Five Flatbed Trucks, Specification No. A-168, to Los Angeles Freightliner/GMC for a total amount not to exceed $115,530.80 plus sales tax. See page C Ib) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase order contract for Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, Specification No. E-229, for nine systems, to GST, Inc. for a total amount not to exceed $31,557.25 plus sales tax. See page D (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to bioMerieux Vitek, Inc. in the amount of $37,130.00, plus sales tax and freight, for Purchase of bioMerieux Vitek Jr. Bacteria Identification System, (Specification No. E-230). -3- 05/12/93 (10) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 21 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $192,366.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for three items of additional work or other contract adjustments. See page E (e) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-45, approving plans and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1 , Job No. P1-38-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish May 18, 1993 as the date for receipt of bids. See page F (f) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design, construction support services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional engineering services for seismic work as provided in the agreement and to incorporate additional changes in the scope of work: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page G (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-46, approving Addendum No. 3 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $527,600.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $1,991 ,565.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,519,165.00. See page H -4- .► 05/12/93 ... (10) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-47, approving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Dames & Moore, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, to conduct Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $840,620.00. See page I (h) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P11-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page J (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-48, approving said agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for said services, on an hourly-basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $549,000.00. See page K (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for planning, design and construction services in connection with master-planned support facilities at Plants 1 and 2 (includes Job Nos. J-11-1, J-26, J-27, P2-23-5-1, P2-35-2, P2-35-3, P2-35-4 and P2-35-5) providing for changes to the original scope of work. (j) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate an agreement for Environmental and Geotechnical Services, Specification No. 5-070, for various collection system and treatment plant projects to be constructed over the next three years. -5- 05/12/93 (10) DISTRICTS 1 & 2 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (k) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, authorizing a net addition of $78,273.22 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company for five items of additional or modified work. Seepage L DISTRICT 2 (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-51-2, approving an exchange of ownership Agreement between the City of Placentia and County Sanitation District No. 2 providing for transfer of ownership of the Palm Avenue Purchase to the City of Placentia. See page M DISTRICT 5 (m) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-53-5, accepting Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page N DISTRICT 7 (n) Consideration of the following actions relative to Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1: (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, granting a time extension of 33 calendar days to the contract with Silveri & LeBouef for completion of said work due to inclement weather. See page O (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-55-7, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page P -6- 05/12/93 (10) DISTRICT 7 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (o) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-56-7, approving and authorizing execution of Grant of Easement to Crow Winthrop Development for 10' right-of-way required to install a new sewer line over the northeasterly corner of District's Michelson Pump Station site, Contract No. 7-11-2 in exchange for a Quitclaim of abandoned sewer line in a 10' easement located on said site from Crow Winthrop Development. See page 0 (p) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint for Order Relieving Petitioner from provisions of Government Code, Section 945.4, Loyd T. Nitzen, 11 vs. Orange County Sanitation District, Case No. 708855, relative to an application for leave to file late claim that was denied by the District in connection with a vehicle accident in the vicinity where routine sewer maintenance was being performed in the City of Tustin by District's crews, and authorize the District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. DISTRICT 11 `..i (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-57-11, approving Amendment No. 1 to Lease Agreement with General Telephone Company re Slater Avenue Pump Station, authorizing an extension of lease agreement for an additional three years at the current rate of $1,900.00 per year. See page R END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (11) ALLDISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -7- 05/12/93 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees' written reports of their meetings on April 21, 1993 and April 28, 1993, respectively (Copies enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said Committees: (1) Consideration of the following actions relative to Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP): (a) Consideration of motion approving selection of Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe to serve as special bond counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP, (1993 SWAP), and requesting a fee proposal for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. (b) Consideration of motion approving selection of Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin to serve as co-counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP, (1993 SWAP), and requesting a fee proposal for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing staff and General Counsel to request that Merrill Lynch, Districts' underwriter, utilize either the firm of Brown and Wood or the firm of Jones, Hall, Hill and White to serve as underwriter's counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series. (2) Consideration of the following actions relative to Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing staff and General Counsel to take steps necessary to seek approval by the State Legislature of an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program for Districts' construction projects. (b) Considerations of motion authorizing and directing staff and Robert F. Driver Associates, Districts' insurance consultant/broker, to report back with further information on an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program for Districts' construction projects, a draft of such a plan and an implementation schedule [ITEM (12)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 91 -B- 05/12/93 .... 021 ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 8) (b) (3) Consideration of motion declaring the 1993-94 Sewer Use Fees and Connection Fees will not increase from rates established for the 1992-93 fiscal year and will continue to be in effect for 1993-94, provided the Governor and State Legislature do not confiscate Districts' property taxes, as follows: ANNUAL SEWER USE FEES - 1993-94 District Single-Family Multi-Family Non-Residential No. Residential Residential Properties 1 $ 83.24 $49.94/Unit $59.52/1,000 SF 2 71.52 42.91/Unit 51.14/1,000 SF 3 73.89 44.33/Unit 52.83/1,000 SF 5 96.75 58.05/Unit 69.1811,000 SF 6 76.47 45.88/Unit 54.68/1,000 SF 7 50.09 30.05/Unit 35.81/1,000 SF 11 60.00 36.00/Unit 42.90/1,000 SF \� 13 100.00 60.00/Unit 71.50/1,000 SF 14 NONE- District No. 14 is fully funded by IRWD CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION FEES - 1993-94 DISTRICTS NO, 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 11 & 13 RESIDENTIAL $2,350/DWELLING UNIT NON-RESIDENTIAL $470/1,000 SQUARE FEET, $2,350 MINIMUM DISTRICT NO. 14 NONE - District No. 14 if fully funded by IRWD [ITEM (12)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 101 -9- 05/12/93 02) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from page 9) (b) (4) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing staff and General Counsel to draft an amendment to the Districts' Ordinance Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges for introduction and first reading at the regular June meeting of the Boards of Directors, to adjust or establish said fees in the amounts determined necessary to recover the Districts' costs. (5) Consideration of motion directing that no further study be given to the issue of modifying sewer connection fees and that no change be made to the existing policy that does not allow fee adjustments (NOTE: District 3 Directors also see separate Agenda Item No. 34) (6) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-49, amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a 1993 Summer Work Program for painting, grounds maintenance and pump station maintenance work. See page $ (7) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-50, Urging Equitable Alloction of Property Taxes and State Support of School Funding in California before consideration of further Property Tax Shifts. See page I (8) Consideration of the following actions relative to Districts' Two- Way Radio System/County-Wide 800 MHz Radio System: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing staff to continue to monitor the progress and development of the proposed new County-Wide 800 MHz Radio System and upon receipt of additional information assess the advisability of the Districts' participation in the system and report back to the Boards; and, in the interim, continue to maintain the Districts' existing 453 MHz Two-Way Radio system in a state of readiness and repair to meet the Districts' day-to-day and emergency radio communications needs. (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. in the amount of $38,383.00 plus sales tax, for Purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment (Specification No. E-227). -1a 4 05/12/93 (13) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on April 27, 1993 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (14) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (14) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from page 10) (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (15) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (16) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn �. -11- 05/12/93 (18) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (24) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (25) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (27) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn (28) DISTRICTS 5 & 6 (a) Verbal report of staff (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-52, approving plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (tentative bid date is June 8, 1993). See page V (29) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn -12- a 05/12/93 (31) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of the following actions relative to Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36: (a) Verbal report of Staff (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, making miscellaneous modifications and clarifications. (c) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, making miscellaneous modifications and clarifications. (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-54-5, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, to Schuler Engineering Corporation, in the total amount of $993,442.00. See page V (32) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (33) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (34) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of request to reduce sewer connection charges for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton (Copies of requests included with salmon-colored staff report dated April 7, 1993, attached to the Fiscal Policy Committee Report and Executive Committee Report enclosed with supporting agenda material) (a) Discussion (b) Consideration of the following alternative actions: [ITEM (34) CONTINUED ON PAGE 141 `.J -13- 05/12/93 e (34) DISTRICT 3 (Continued from page 13) (b) (1) Consideration of motion to deny the request and directing that no further study be given to the issue of establishing a separate class of sewer connection charges and that no change be made to the existing policy that does not allow fee adjustments. (NOTE: District 3 Directors see also separate Agenda Item (12)(b)(5).) -or- (2) Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance No. 320, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, Amending Ordinance No. 317, Providing for a Separate Class of Connection Charges for Certain Minimum Size Dwelling Units: See page W (a) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the �*✓ District to assure the protection of the environment and natural resources. (b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 320 by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present). (c) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance No. 320 and pass to second reading and hearing on June 9, 1993. (35) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (36) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn -14- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 -� JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE MAY 12, 1993 AT 7:30 P.M. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self- explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. EACH DISTRICT 4: ANNUAL ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND CHAIRMAN PRO TEM OF EACH DISTRICT'S BOARD. In accordance with the Districts' rules of procedure (see following excerpt), a Chairman and Chairman pro tem for each District Board is elected annually at the May meeting. Excerpt from Rules of Procedure for Meetings "7. Chairman of the District - A Chairman (and Chairman pro tem) shall be elected by majority vote as the first order of business by the members of each District's Board of Directors at the first meeting in May of each year, and said Chairman (and Chairman pro tem) shall serve at the pleasure of the majority of said members." For the information of the new Directors, the Districts' regulations provide that each Chairman automatically becomes a member of the Executive Committee, which ordinarily meets monthly at the call of the Joint Chairman. This Committee also includes the Joint Chairman, Vice Joint Chairman and the representatives of the County Board of Supervisors. The Executive Committee's function is to study and make recommendations to the Joint Boards concerning major issues and policy matters. May 12, 1993 The current Chairmen and Chairmen pro tam are as follows: District No. Chairman Chairman oro tem 1 Robert Richardson Fred Barrera 2 Henry W. Wedaa John Collins 3 Sal A. Sapien Burnie Dunlap 5 John C. Cox, Jr. Phil Sansone 6 James A. Wahner Evelyn Hart 7 Charles E. Puckett James A. Wahner 11 Grace Winchell Victor Leipzig 13 John M. Gullixson Fred Berrara 14 Peer A. Swan Leslie A. Pontious Nominations for Joint Chairman are made at the regular June meeting and the election takes place at the regular July meeting. Nominations and election of the Vice Joint Chairman are conducted at the regular July meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 10(a): AWARD OF FIVE FLATBED TRUCKS. SPECIFICATION NO, A-168. Five flatbed trucks are needed for the Plant Maintenance, Mechanical Maintenance and the Collection Facilities Divisions of the Operations and Maintenance Department. These vehicles will be used for needs in plant piping work, central power generation system repairs and maintenance, and sewer line cleaning operations Four will be replacing 1970's vintage trucks. The replaced vehicles will be sent to auction. Sealed bids were received on April 15, 1993 for the purchase of the five flatbed trucks. Six bids were received. The low bid was for $115,530.80 and the high bid was $124,000.00, plus applicable sales tax. As part of our program to comply with SCAOMD regulations, the Districts are investigating the conversion of selected vehicles from gasoline power to liquid propane or other alternate fuel that will assist in meeting clean air goals versus -2- May 12, 1993 V operating on the new reformulated gasolines. The above purchases are therefore recommended with confirmation from the manufacturer that the vehicles can use either the reformulated gasolines or be converted to use "clean burn" alternative fuel. Staff recommends award be made to Los Angeles Freightliner/GMC, the lowest responsible bidder, for the Purchase of Five Flatbed Trucks, Specification No. A-168, for the total price of $115,530.80, plus applicable sales tax. 10(b): AWARD PURCHASE OF MICROCOMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND ASSOCIATED PERIPHERALS, SPECIFICATION NO. E-229. The Districts utilize microcomputers (also known as personal computers, or "PCs") for a wide variety of applications, technically and administratively, within each department and at each of the two treatment plants. Uses include word processing; spread sheets for data analysis and reporting; data base management for data collection, analysis, manipulation and storage; data acquisition for laboratory instruments; data modeling and statistical analysis; graphical data representation for analysis; and many more. The necessary growth of the Districts' activities to keep pace with growing system demands and the attendant need for more sophisticated management and operational "tools" to optimize efficiency and effectiveness requires periodic purchases of additional microcomputer systems with related hardware, software and peripheral equipment. Three times each year, staff prepares a schedule of current computer needs and solicits formal competitive bids. Sealed bids were opened April 20, 1993 and five bids were received. Staff recommends award of Specification No. E-229, Purchase of Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, to GST, Inc., Santa Ana, the lowest responsible bidder, for a total of $31,557.25, plus sales tax. A total of 9 new systems are needed, together with related peripherals and equipment. These systems will be allocated as follows: 4CV. Cost Dept./Use 2 $4,583.50 Accounting: Replace obsolete systems for Principal Account and Financial Technician 0 804.00 Information Services: Upgrade monitor on an existing system 2 4,765.50 Operations and Maintenance: One system for supervisor and one system to be used by engineering interns -3- May 12, 1993 0tv. Cost Dept./Use `..� 3 5,849.25 Operations: New systems (one each) for operations supervisors, and new systems (one for Plant 1, one for Plant 2) for Training Section 2 15,555.00 Laboratory: Color notebook computers for Molecular Biology Section. One each grant contract with NWRI and one each for training and meeting demonstrations off site. New network-connected high speed laser printer S31 .557.25 Iglus sales taxi 10(c): AWARD PURCHASE OF BIOMERIEUX VITEK JR. AUTOMATED BACTERIA IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM, SPECIFICATION NO. E-230. As a part of the Districts' NPDES ocean monitoring program, the Laboratory Division performs bacteriological analyses on about 8,400 marine water samples annually. Quality Assurance (QA) procedures require that duplicate analyses and second-method verification (identification to genus and species) be performed on at least ten percent of these samples. Currently, the verification procedure is performed using the manual API system. The API system uses complex biochemical tests utilizing procedures and a data base devised for medical laboratory applications. The API methods are labor intensive and the data base is not always appropriate for identifying microorganisms found in the marine environment. To improve our efficiency, accuracy and performance in the second- method verification, four automated bacteria identification systems were investigated. These systems included bioMdrieux Vitek Jr., MIDI (Microbial Identification Systems), Biolog and Microscan. The investigation revealed the following: The MIDI microbial identification system is based on fatty acids. The protocol requires a multistep, 4-hour extraction procedure and uses hazardous solvents. The Biolog system does not have a built-in incubator, requires manual inoculation of isolates into the test cards, and requires 24-hour incubation. The Microscan system will not identify bacillus bacteria, and its companion software program lacks flexibility in identifying atypical organisms. -4- May 12, 1993 The bioM3rieux Vitek Jr. has none of the limitations encountered with the other systems. This system can identify a wide range of isolates, including those from environmental sources. Its software is compatible with environmental isolates and the company will instruct us on how to tailor the program to meet our needs. It automatically inoculates the reaction cards, incubates the cards in an internal incubator, and begins reading the cards after 15 minutes. The instrument will continue to read biochemical reactions for up to 18 hours, but the majority of isolates are identified in hour hours or less because of constant interaction between the system and the built-in incubator. The purchase price includes setup, training, and free software updates. A 24-hour on-call service engineer is available for repairs or information. Payback Analysis (Annual Basis) for bioM6rieux Vitek Jr. No. of Cost Analysis Old Method New Method Savings Labor Materials Total Labor Materials FTtal 840 $8,925 $3,780 $12,705 $1,785 1 $2,940 1 $4,725 $7,980 Payback 4.6 Years Based on these comparisons, staff recommends the purchase of the bioMErieux Vitek Jr. Automated Bacterial Identification System, Specification No. E-230, in the amount of $37,130.00, plus sales tax and freight. 10ld): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO, 21 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1. Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, designed by Brown and Caldwell, is part of the $66 million master-planned Central Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at both plants. This $16.6 million contract includes installation of three prepurchased digester-gas burning, spark-ignited, 3472 horsepower engines with generators that are each capable of producing 2500 kilowatts of electrical power. Change Order No. 21 adds $192,366.00 and 67 calendar days to the contract for three items of -5- May 12, 1993 additional work, including costs for further delays resulting from deficient lube oil filters provided by the engine manufacturer, Cooper Industries. The delay costs have been previously reported to the Directors in conjunction with discussions regarding the Central Power Generation System engine problems Item 1, in an amount not to exceed $187,454.00, is for additional contractor extended overhead costs for the period of January 19, 1993 through June 18, 1993. These costs are associated with further delays in starting up the owner-supplied equipment (engines) and revised start-up procedures as described in previous Change Order No. 18, Item 1, approved by the Directors on February 10, 1993. As reported to the Boards, the start-up of the engines has most recently been delayed by inadequate lube oil filters provided by the engine manufacturer, Cooper. The negotiated cost for extended overhead declines as time goes on; full payment may not be required. Approval now will allow monthly payments as needed and a final accounting will be provided in a future change order. This item includes a 67-calendar day extension of time for delays associated with this lube oil filter element dispute. At this time, Cooper Industries continues to deny responsibility for these deficiencies. Work to correct the engine and appurtenant equipment was authorized to be initiated by the Boards on December 9, 1992 to minimize costs due to delays. The Boards also directed the General Counsel to seek remedies and cost recovery from Cooper for breach of contract. Final resolution of this dispute with the engine manufacturer will be settled at a later date. L/ Item 2, in the amount of $3,221.00, is for adding telephone cables for service to the elevator car, electric room, and control room not included in the original contract. Telephone service to the elevator car is required by state codes and must be completed prior to commissioning the elevator. Telephone service to the control and electric rooms is required for Districts operational staff currently occupying portions of the building. Item 3, in the amount of $1,691.00, is for revising pressure relief valve and pressure switch settings for the starting and instrument air receivers to pressures less than the maximum allowable pressure stamped on the tanks as required by ASME pressure vessel codes. The pressure relief valves were recalibrated and certified off site and reinstalled. Except for Items 1 and 3, the above described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. Item 1 is the result of manufacturing problems. A portion of Item 3 involves rework. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $1,447,454.00 with 335 calendar days time extension. This represents an increase of 9.39% over the original contract. Of this amount, -6- May 12, 1993 2.77% represents the cost of correcting deficiencies in the gas-driven engines and related equipment which were improperly manufactured and prepared for storage by the engine manufacturer. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 21 for a net addition of $192,366.00 and 67 calendar days to the contract with Hunter Corporation. 10le): APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRIORITY PROJECTS ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-38-2. Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, include over 100 relatively small miscellaneous improvements to various facilities throughout both treatment plants. The proposed improvements will enhance safety, process reliability and performance, and replace obsolete equipment and systems. These items have been split among five smaller projects, which have been categorized as higher priority projects at each plant, lower priority projects at each plant, and security and landscaping improvements at Plant No. 1 . This project, Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, is the second in the series of five construction projects to be bid. There are twenty-one items of work included in these construction documents. The following summarizes the larger items of work to be undertaken: - Demolition of the old City Water Pump Station. - Prechlorination system modifications to convert system from manual control to flow paced control. - Modifications to improve operations and safety at the Chlorine Building. - Chemical storage tank containment areas to prevent contamination. - Modifications to the primary treatment facilities to improve sludge density control, scum removal and pumping, and to provide safer access to the scum removal point at the circular basins. - Replacement of all sewage diversion gates at the Metering and Diversion Structure. - Construction of two new scrubbers to operate in series with the Headworks scrubbers to treat peak loads of hydrogen sulfide from the influent trunks to reduce odors. - Replacement of the paging system at both plants. - Automatic transfer switch at the plant water pumps. -7- May 12, 1993 Piping modifications at grit chambers to alleviate plugging problems. Staff has accelerated the bidding process to take advantage of the excellent bidding climate. Staff recommends the approval of the plans and specifications, and authorization to receive bids on May 18, 1993 for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2. The engineer's estimate is $5,000,000. 101fj: RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RE JOBS NOS. P1-38 AND P2-43• In June 1991, the Directors awarded a professional services agreement to John Carollo Engineers for preparation of plans and specifications for design and construction support services for miscellaneous facilities at both plants, to design the replacement of equipment which is obsolete or has reached the end of its useful life span, rehabilitation of facilities which are in need of repair, or modification of process elements to improve plant-wide performance. Addendum No. 1 revised the errors and omissions insurance requirements, and Addendum No. 2 increased the scope of work to include several small items which, because of their small scale in relation to the large number of items in the miscellaneous improvement projects, could best be included in this design contract thereby benefiting from economies of scale. Addendum No. 3 provides for additional engineering services to complete the design for seismic retrofit of nonstructural items, and to incorporate smaller scope changes, such as recessing two new scrubbers for aesthetics, using polymer blending systems and controls as requested by our operations staff, and replacing worn fans, pumps and tanks in areas related to items in the original scope of work. The original scope of work required the consultant to provide the detailed design for the seismic retrofit of nonstructural items at both treatment plants. The nonstructural items include above-ground piping systems, a ducting system, electrical raceways, electrical equipment, mechanical equipment, chemical storage tanks, scrubbers, and bookshelves and storage racks in various buildings. This detailed design is based on earlier studies by Dames & Moore Inc. which identified the need for the work. -8- May 12, 1993 When the proposals were solicited for the project, the extent of the seismic retrofit of nonstructural items was estimated to require 5,000 hours of design work. All consultants that submitted proposals to perform the engineering services were required by the Scope of Work to use this estimate in their proposals. The exact effort was unknown at the time because a detailed field investigation by qualified structural engineers to observe the existing conditions of the seismic restraints on all nonstructural systems had to be made as part of the project's early work to quantify the extent of the retrofit. The Districts' staff engineers are not afforded the time to conduct this type of detailed investigation due to their heavy project loads. Therefore, the RFP fixed the number of hours at 5,000 so that all the proposals would be comparable, with the provision that an adjustment would be made once the full effort had been defined. The full investigation, now completed, shows that a total of approximately 8,000 hours of design work is required for the complete task, which equates to an additional 3,000 hours of design work. As authorized by the Directors in February, the Selection Committee has negotiated Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for the additional professional services, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, for the additional contract amount of $527,600.00, as follows: Proposed Existing Proposed Amended Aoreement Addn. No. 3 Aoreement Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 156%, not to exceed $1,420,359.20 $439,800.00 $1,860,159.20 Construction Support Services and 0&M Manual Preparation, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 160%, not to exceed 223,425.80 0.00 223,425.80 Direct Expenses, at cost, not to exceed 76,690.00 35,000.00 111,690.00 Subconsultants, not to exceed 34,200.00 0.00 0.00 Fixed Profit 236,890.00 52,800.00 289,690.00 Total Amended Contract, not to exceed $1,991,565.00 3527.600.00 52.519.165.00 -9- May 12, 1993 The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above additional work, and adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Jobs Nos. P1-38 and P2-43. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. 101g1: APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO DAMES & MOORE, INC. FOR SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2. JOBS NOS. P7-38-3 AND P2-43-32. In October 1990, the Boards awarded a Professional Services Agreement to Dames and Moore to provide engineering services for the Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Jobs Nos. P7-38-3 and P2-43-2. This project was for the structural and geotechnical investigation of Districts' facilities, focusing on older facilities originally designed under less stringent criteria. Headworks B and C at Plant No. 2 were high on the rehabilitation priority list, and in November 1991 the Directors authorized Addendum No. 1 to the Dames and Moore contract for the design of a seismic retrofit to these facilities. Addendum No. 2, approved in May 1992, provided for reallocation of funds between categories at no increase in contract amount and changed the firm's name to Dames & Moore, Inc. Dames & Moore has requested that the contract amounts be adjusted again to more closely reflect actual expenditures. Specifically, it is requested that the amount for Subcontractors Fees be reduced by $27,000.00, Direct Expenses be increased by $10,000.00, and Direct Labor be increased by $17,000.00. Dames & Moore has made this request because they were able to complete most of the work for B and C Headworks design with in-house staff on their recently acquired CADD system, in lieu of using outside subcontractors. No additional work has been added to the contract. There is no change in the maximum authorization of $840,620.00, as follows: -10- May 12, 1993 Proposed Existing Proposed Amended Agreement Addn. No. 3 Agreement Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 180%, not to exceed $627,540.00 $17,000.00 $644,540.00 Direct Expenses, at cost, not to exceed 22,800.00 10,000.00 32,800.00 Subconsultants, not to exceed 120,000.00 (27,000.00) 93,000.00 Fixed Profit 70 280.00 0.00 70,280.00 Total Contract, not to exceed 5840.620.00 S 0 00 5840.620.00 The action appearing on the agenda is to adopt a resolution approving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Dames & Moore, Inc. for design of Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2. A copy of the resolution is attached with the supporting agenda documents. 10(h): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE & RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-40-2. AND FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO, 2. JOB NO, P2-47-2• Through the routine activities of design, construction, operations and maintenance of our 294 million gallon per day capacity sewage treatment plants, small jobs are continually identified by staff which require evaluation and possible upgrading or modification. These small projects, which require more time than available for Districts' staff to evaluate and design in-house because of limited staff resources, are assembled into larger projects for ease of project management when using outside consulting services. A number of these small jobs have been assembled for the subject projects, Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. 127-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2. v _11_ May 12, 1993 Staff has prepared a scope of work outlining the recommended improvements to facilities at both the Huntington Beach Treatment Plant and Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. The work will improve aspects of our activities pertaining to safety, operations, maintenance, aesthetics and odor control. There are a total of sixty-two separate items of work between the two facilities. Fourteen tasks will provide safer work environments, thirty-three tasks will improve operations and plant efficiency, one task will be completed to meet South Coast Air Quality Management District permit requirements, nine tasks will improve odor control, three tasks will improve plant aesthetics, and two tasks will improve facilities and equipment access for operations and maintenance work. The tasks are an accumulation of relatively minor modifications or restorations deemed necessary by operations, maintenance, safety and engineering staffs. All of the work is on existing process equipment, and will require extensive coordination to accommodate ongoing plant operations during construction. The estimated total project cost is $3.5 million. In February, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals for a professional services agreement for the above described work. Proposals were received from three firms. The Selection Committee has negotiated a professional services agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers to prepare the design report, plans and specifications, and provide construction support services, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, for an amount not to exceed $549,000.00. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work, and adoption of a resolution approving a Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. 101i): AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS RE MASTER-PLANNED SUPPORT FACILITIES AT PLANTS 1 AND 2. JOBS NOS. J-11-1. J-26, J-27, P2-23-5-1. P2-35-2. P2-35-3. P2-35-4 AND P2-35-5. In May 1989, the Boards awarded a professional services agreement to Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers to provide engineering services for the design of eight separate master-planned support facilities for Plants 1 and 2. The Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2 , Job No. P2-23-5-1(Rebid No. 2) is now under construction with completion expected a year from now. -12- May 12, 1993 In May 1991, Addendum No. 1 was approved by the Boards providing for extra costs because of delays in finalizing the projects. Several of the projects have been delayed and changed in the interim. For example, the 1992 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) passed by Congress in July required changes to the plans and specifications, including adding an elevator and other exit requirements. Other changes include relocating proposed buildings, and providing additional power supply requirements. Also, an alternate city water supply may be required. Additional changes will significantly reduce the original scope of work. Other work has been delayed due to budgetary constraints. The Operations Center Expansion, which was bid three times, was finally awarded in February 1993. Therefore, certain scope changes, and possible contract adjustments, may be appropriate. Accordingly, staff is recommending that the Selection Committee solicit a proposal and negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for additions and deletions to the scope of work, and costs for delays re master-planned support facilities at Plants 1 and 2: Jobs Nos. J-11-1, J-26, J-27, P2-23-5-1, P2-35-2, P2-35-3, P2-35-4 and 122-35-5. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Boards for consideration. 10(j): AUTHORIZE THE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-070, FOR COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS. Environmental and geotechnical services for the Districts' design and construction projects have traditionally been provided by consultants acting as subconsultants to the Districts' consulting design engineers. Soils explorations are usually performed during the design phase of a project, with professional services contracts administered by the Districts' staff. Specialized environmental and geotechnical services are required for many projects, including liquefaction potential of the soils at Plants 1 and 2, and other issues which require environmental and seismic expertise from speciality consultants. The problem of liquefaction potential requires design and testing of various alternatives for the design of each project. In addition, during excavation for trunk sewers contaminated soil from leaking underground tanks is often encountered requiring risk assessment and/or soils testing as well as advice on how to best resolve the problem. Because of the volume of collection system and treatment plant work, and the need to be able to resolve environmental or seismic problems with minimum project delays, staff is recommending that the Selection Committee be -13- May 12, 1993 authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate an agreement to provide environmental and geotechnical services on an as-needed basis. This work would be done by a consultant(s) under contract with the Districts, rather than as a subcontractor to our designers. There should be no increase in cost, only a shift in contract administration from the design consultant to the Districts' staff. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed agreement will be presented to the Boards for consideration. DISTRICTS 1 AND 2 10(k): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 2-30. This $3.5 million project within the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana includes the construction of a new 2.2-mile gravity sewer line and appurtenances in Memory Lane from the Santa Ana River to the Santa Ana Freeway, in Owens Drive from the Santa Ana Freeway to Parker Street, in Parker Street from Owens Drive to La Vets Avenue and in Parker Street to Batavia Street. Portions are being constructed using boring techniques where open excavations were prohibited, such as crossing the Santa Ana Freeway. Funding is being shared with the City of Santa Ana at $1.3 million, the City of Orange at $700,000.00, with Districts 1 and 2 sharing the remaining $1.5 million. Change Order No.t adds $78,273.22 to the contract for five items of additional work. Item 1, in the amount of $12,939.06, is for additional work and delays caused by undisclosed underground utilities encountered during excavation and pipe laying operations, including sewer, water and gas lines in Memory Lane, City of Santa Ana; and water and gas lines in Parker Street, City of Orange. Item 2, a credit in the amount of $25,000.00, is for the substitution of 30-inch diameter, Class 52 ductile iron polyethylene-lined and polyvinyl-wrapped pipe for the specified 30-inch diameter vitrified clay pipe. Item 3, in the amount of $32,905.16, is for undisclosed rock conditions that were found during the excavation for the sewer line in Parker Street, north of Town and Country Road. Item 4, in the amount of $10,302.00, is for extra work involved when a broken water main flooded the trench in Memory Lane in Santa Ana. Item 5, in the amount of $47,127.00, is for extending the jacked casing on both sides of the freeway right-of-way, required by CALTRANS field engineer, and because of an undisclosed concrete thrust block for a 16-inch water line. CALTRANS ordered the majority of the extension, well beyond that required on the CALTRANS permit at the time of the construction. -14- May 12, 1993 The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. There is no replacement work. If the Directors approve this change order, the total of the change orders to date on this contract will be $78,273.22 with no calendar days time extension. This represents an increase of 2.3% over the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for a net addition of $78,273.22 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. DISTRICT 2 100): APPROVE EXCHANGE OF OWNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 AND CITY OF PLACENTIA RE PALM AVENUE PURCHASE. CONTRACT NO. 2-33. The Palm Avenue Purchase sewer, built in 1962, was purchased by County Sanitation District No. 2 (CSD 2) in 1964 from the Yorba Linda Water District for $32,000. The 15-inch Palm Avenue Purchase sewer runs 2,850 feet from Kraemer Boulevard to Valencia Avenue and flows to the Yorba Linda Pump Station. The Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor, Contract No. 2-17-2, is a 4,135-foot, 39-inch sewer constructed in 1974, parallel to the Palm Avenue Purchase sewer, to serve new development. The Palm Avenue Purchase sewer no v longer has a major value to the District as a trunk sewer and can be abandoned. However, it does have value to the City of Placentia as a local collector, and the City of Placentia has requested that the District transfer ownership of the Palm Avenue Purchase to the City. Transfer of the sewer would relieve the Districts of the costs of abandonment and all maintenance and repair responsibilities. An exchange of ownership agreement has therefore been prepared to transfer ownership of the Palm Avenue Purchase sewer from CSD 2 to Placentia. General Counsel has approved the agreement in form. The action appearing on the agenda is to approve the exchange of ownership Agreement between CSD 2 and the City of Placentia. Staff recommends approval. v -15- May 12, 1993 DISTRICT 5 10(m): APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS TO BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER. PHASE 3. CONTRACT NO, 5-34-3 AS COMPLETE, AND EXECUTION OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT. This $4.8 million project within the City of Newport Beach includes the construction of a new sewer line in Pacific Coast Highway through Corona del Mar. Portions were constructed using tunneling techniques where excavations are deep. Included in this contract is the repair of several sewer laterals installed by the City of Newport Beach to the Sanitation District's old sewer line, thereby allowing abandonment of the old line, as well as a new median in Pacific Coast Highway, southerly of Hazel Drive. This contract is now complete. Silveri and LeBouef have fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified and extended time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached with the agenda material, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $4,757,710.00. DISTRICT 7 10(n): APPROVAL FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE ABANDONMENT OF RED HILL PUMP STATION. PHASE 1 . CONTRACT NO, 7-14-1-1. AS COMPLETE. This Phase 1 project, within the City of Tustin and unincorporated County territory, includes the construction of a gravity sewer pipe in easements from Pavilion Drive to Lambert Street. The project will allow flows tributary to the Red Hill Pump Station to be directed to the Irvine Ranch Water District's (IRWD) Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer (HATS). In the near future, this project will be followed by the Phase 2 project which is the actual abandonment of the Red Hill Pump Station. That work must await completion of certain other sewers by IRWD. The contract is now complete. (1) Chance Order No. 1 Change Order No. 1 grants a 33-calendar day time extension to the contract for inclement weather. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for the addition of 33 calendar days to the contract. -16- May 12, 1993 (2) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Silveri and LeBouef JV have fulfilled all contractual obligations within the allotted and extended time. Staff therefore recommends adoption of the resolution attached with the supporting agenda documents, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $90,732.00. 10(0): APPROVING EXCHANGE OF SEWER LINE EASEMENTS BETWEEN DISTRICT 7 AND CROW WINTHROP AT MICHELSON PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO, 7-11-2. Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2, has been recently upgraded and relocated to a new site within the Park Place Development located between Michelson Avenue and the San Diego Freeway east of Jamboree Boulevard in the City of Irvine. Over the northeasterly corner of the District's fee- owned pump station site parcel, dedicated by Crow Winthrop, Crow is requesting a ten-foot wide easement required for a new sewer line to be owned by Crow. Concurrently, an older sewer will be abandoned, and Crow is quitclaiming a ten- foot easement to the Districts. There is no monetary exchange involved. The recommended action is to adopt a resolution authorizing the General Manager to execute the Grant of Easement to Crow Winthrop Development in a form approved by General Counsel. The General Manager has authority to accept the Quitclaim. 10(p): RECEIVE AND FILE SUMMONS FROM LOYD T. NITZEN. Il, RE VEHICLE ACCIDENT AND AUTHORIZE GENERAL COUNSEL TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTIONS. The District was recently served with a Summons and Complaint for Order Relieving Petitioner from provisions of Government Code, Section 945.4, with regard to the request to file late claim that was denied by the District re Loyd T. Nitzen, ll, vs Orange County Sanitation District, Case No. 708855 (Claim No. 7- CSD-93-L-1), for alleged personal injuries and property damage in connection with a vehicle accident in the City of Tustin where routine sewer maintenance was being performed by District crews. The General Counsel stated that this claim is an automobile accident which did not Involve District vehicles. A line-cleaning crew was operating in the Tustin vicinity, with the manhole area where they were working coned off and protected in accordance with standard traffic control and safety measures. The -17- May 12, 1993 claimant was southbound and turned left in front of and around the District's vehicle which was parked and coned, and turned in front of oncoming traffic, thereby causing a collision. The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive and file Summons and Complaint and authorize the District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the District. DISTRICT 11 10(g): AUTHORIZE EXTENSION OF LEASE AGREEMENT WITH GTE FOR RIGHT- OF-WAY LEASE AND RENTAL PAYMENTS FOR EMERGENCY GENERATOR AT SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION. In 1988, the District obtained a lease from GTE for a small parcel adjacent to the Slater Avenue Pump Station for placement of a trailer containing an emergency generator. This is a critical pump station and the generator is on-site to avoid a sewage spill in the event of a power outage. It was expected that the new Slater Avenue Pump Station, which will have a built-in emergency generator, would be completed within the five-year term of the lease, however, the project has been delayed for various reasons. Staff therefore recommends that the Directors authorize an extension of the term of the lease for an additional three years to February 1, 1996, at the same rate, $1,900 per year. The new pump station will be constructed and operational by the end of the three-year period. The action appearing on the agenda is to adopt a resolution amending the original authorization and approving a three-year extension of the lease. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR ALL DISTRICTS 12: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF FISCAL POLICY/EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on April 21, 1993, and the Executive Committee met on April 28, 1993. Enclosed for the Directors are written reports on their deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. _18_ May 12, 1993 13: REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE. The Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee met on April 27, 1993. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report of its meeting. 14: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 28: APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER. BETWEEN THE ARCHES (NEWPORT BOULEVARD) AND DOVER DRIVE, CONTRACT NO. 5-37-4. In July 1992, the Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway ...� Gravity Sewer, between Bitter Point Pump Station and Dover Drive, Contracts 5-37-3 and 5-37-4. The 1989 Master Plan had found that the existing sewer is hydraulically inadequate to meet long-term flow projections. The sewer, built in 1936, is also failing and its replacement and/or rehabilitation for structural reasons is more urgent now then for future hydraulic needs. CALTRANS is planning to reconstruct and resurface Coast Highway between Newport Boulevard and Dover Drive in Newport Beach between February and June 1994. Therefore, this project has been accelerated to be completed prior to the start of the CALTRANS work. Plans and specifications are complete for Contract No. 5-37-4, the reach between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive. The CALTRANS work is being coordinated with the Districts' project, the needs of the adjacent business and residential communities, and with the needs identified by the City of Newport Beach. The sewer line work between Newport Boulevard and Dover Drive is scheduled to begin construction in September 1993 with completion by January 1994. -19- May 12, 1993 There have been several public meetings between the Districts' engineering staff and the Mariners Mile Business Association, as well as the adjacent business and residential communities. As a result, a portion of the sewer replacement will include rehabilitation by either the Insituform method or by insertion of a high density polyethylene pipe Into the existing pipe (approximately 3,200 feet of 24-inch pipe). The balance of the project will involve replacement of approximately 3,100 feet of 30-Inch pipe and reconstruction of all manholes. As part of Contract No. 5-37-4, the Districts will identify utilities that will have a critical bearing on the selected alignment for future Contract No. 5-37-3, between the Arches and Bitter Point Pump Station, tentatively scheduled for fall 1994. The specifications provide for a bonus of $500 per day for early job completion plus a $1,000 per day bonus for early completion of the rehabilitation work. Late completion will result in identical liquidated damage assessments. Westerly of the Arches, Pacific Coast Highway has already been reconstructed by CALTRANS. Alignment studies are still being conducted by the Districts' consultant to determine the optimal alignment for this reach to minimize disruptions to a newly reconstructed Pacific Coast Highway. This reach will involve full replacement with larger carrier pipes to meet future hydraulic capacity requirements. The design of this reach will be completed by year-end with construction starting after Contract No. 5-37-4 is completed. Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Contract No. 5-37-4. The bid date is tentatively set for June 8, 1993. The engineer's estimate is $1.8 million. DISTRICT 5 31: APPROVAL OF ADDENDA NOS.1 AND 2 AND AWARD CRYSTAL COVE PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO. 5-36. In March, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-36, the new Crystal Cove Pump Station, which will serve the down coast developing areas adjacent to Crystal Cove. This pump station is an essential element within the new South Coast Trunk Sewer System, Phase 2, which was recently awarded to Mike Prlich & Sons under Contract No. 5-35-2. The Crystal Cove Pump Station will receive flow from the upstream gravity sewer system and discharge flow into the new double-barrel force main system being built under Contract No. 5-35-2. -20- May 12, 1993 (1) Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications makes modifications to the plans to include the revised location of new drainage ditches installed by the County of Orange which are interfering with the new pump station driveway location. (2) Addendum No. 2 Addendum No. 2 makes several modifications and technical clarifications to the plans, specifications, permits and appendix, clarifying CALTRANS permit conditions, electrical standards, and structural details in response to questions raised during the bidding phase. (3) Award of Contract On April 13, 1993, 13 bids were received for said contract. The bids ranged from a high of $1,331,633.00 to a low of $993,442.00, submitted by Schuler Engineering Corporation. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material. Staff recommends approval of Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 and award to Schuler Engineering Corporation in their low bid amount of $933,442.00. The engineer's estimate was $1.0 million. DISTRICT 3 34: REQUEST TO CONSIDER MODIFIED SEWER CONNECTION FEES FOR LOW INCOME/SENIOR CITIZEN PROJECTS. At the April 14th meeting, District 3 Directors received a request to reduce sewer connection fees from Jan Development Co., and Chairman Sal Sapien for the Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton. After considerable discussion, because sewer connection fees are administered in accordance with a uniform policy adopted by all Districts and any modifications could have Districts'-wide implications, the matter was referred to the Fiscal Policy Committee. The Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee reviewed the issue at length and, for the reasons set forth in the enclosed reports of their meetings dated April 22, 1993 and April 28, 1993, respectively, have -21- May 12, 1993 recommended that no further study be given to the Issue of modifying sewer connection fees and that no change be made to the existing policy that does not allow for any fee adjustments. (See Agenda Item No. 02)(b)(5).) Chairman Sapien has requested that the matter be placed on the May 12, 1993 agenda for separate consideration by District No. 3 Directors. He has also directed staff and the General Counsel to draft an ordinance for introduction in the event the Directors give favorable consideration to the request. The agenda lists discussion of the issue and alternative actions for consideration. J. ay a ylvester G er er JWS:jt _22_ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1C6iC ELLI9 AVENUE PO 90%9127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAUEOFNA 9212"127 April 28, 1993 17141M2-2411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: Aoril 28. 1993 - 5:30 o.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General Evelyn Hart Vice Joint Chairman Counsel Buck Catlin Past Joint Chairman Director Frank Lazio Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 STAFF: John C. Cox, Jr. Chairman, District 5 James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Charles E. Puckett Chairman, District 7 Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Gary Streed, Director of Finance Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Blake Anderson, Director of Roger R. Stanton County Supervisor Technical Services William Steiner County Supervisor Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Absent: Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance Robert Richardson Chairman, District 1 Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 2 Operations John Gullixson Chairman, District 13 Steve Hovey, Manager of Barry Hammond Director Information Services 1) Report and Recommendations of the Fiscal Policy Committee. Fiscal Policy Committee Chairman Puckett reported that the Committee met on April 21st and considered several items of business. Enclosed is a copy of the Committee's report on their deliberations. The following summarizes the recommended action items: April 28, 1993 A. Selection of Firms to Provide Bond Counsel and Underwriter's Counsel Services. The Joint Boards have previously directed the General Counsel to submit a list of firms for consideration by the Directors for providing bond counsel services for upcoming transactions. The Fiscal Policy Committee considered the qualifications of several firms as summarized in the General Counsel' s memorandum of April 7, 1993, and recommended that Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe be selected as bond counsel, Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin as co-counsel; and that Merrill Lynch, the Districts' underwriter, be requested to utilize Brown and Wood or Jones, Hall, Hill and White as underwriter's counsel. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendations, as follows: (1) That Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe be selected to serve as special bond counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, and the Fixed- to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP, (1993 SWAP), and that a fee proposal be requested for consideration by the Directors at a future meeting. (2) That Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin be selected to serve as co-counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP, (1993 SWAP), and that a fee proposal be requested for consideration by the Directors at a future meeting. (3) That Merrill Lynch, the Districts' underwriter, be requested to utilize the firm of Brown and Wood or the firm of Jones, Hall, Hill and White to serve as underwriter's counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series. (The Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP) does not require underwriter's counsel, since it is not a public offering.) -2- April 28, 1993 It was noted that if the underwriter submits a compelling reason to use a different, qualified firm as counsel, the Directors would consider such a request. Director Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. B. Owner-Controlled Wrap -Up Insurance Program. The Fiscal Policy Committee is considering an owner controlled wrap-up insurance program for the Districts which would incorporate contractors' workers' compensation, general liability, excess liability, excess automobile and project errors and omissions insurance for all construction projects into a centralized and coordinated insurance and loss prevention program. Based on the Districts' master-planned construction program over the next three years it is estimated that the Districts could realize approximately $2,528,000 in project insurance cost savings over that period. The Committee is still developing the details of such a program and whether or not it should be implemented by the Districts. Before a wrap-up program could be implemented it would require approval of the State Legislature. There is currently a bill being drafted which requests authorization for two other POTWs in addition to two other public entities. Accordingly, it may be advantageous for the Districts to piggy-back on to this proposed bill rather than "go it alone." The Committee therefore recommended that the necessary legislative authorization be sought and that the proposed program be drafted in more detail. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendations, as follow: 0) That staff and general counsel be authorized and directed to take steps necessary to seek approval by the State Legislature of an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program for Districts' construction projects, -3- April 28, 1993 (2) That staff and Robert F. Driver Associates, the Districts' insurance consultant/broker, be authorized and directed to return to the Fiscal Policy Committee with further information on an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program for Districts' construction projects, a draft of such a plan and an implementation schedule for consideration by the Districts. C. 1993-94 Sewer Use and Connection Fee Recommendations• The Districts are fortunate in that they are able to increase sewer use and connection fees to offset the rising costs of providing sewerage service brought about by stricter regulatory requirements, new development and growth within our service area, and inflation. Unfortunately, it is more difficult for our member agencies to replace revenues or finance added costs shifted by the state and the staff is extremely sensitive to that. Accordingly, for the second year in a row, the General Manager has directed staff to prepare a "hold-the-line budget" (actually the 1992-93 budgets were reduced and are expected to be reduced again in 1993-94) and is recommending that sewer use and connection fees=be increased in 1993-94. These are the same rates originally adopted for 1991-92 and 1992-93, except that user fees for 1992-93 were ultimately increased to offset the confiscation of property taxes by the State in September 1992. If the state confiscates the Districts' remaining property taxes in 1993-94, as they have declared their intent to do, then the only real alternative deemed viable by the Boards last year is to increase user fees to make up for that loss in property taxes. To do otherwise would seriously jeopardize the Districts' operational and fiscal integrity and excellent standing in the financial community and, in fact, most likely end up costing our ratepayers substantially more in the long-run for increased interest and other costs. If the State confiscates the Districts' remaining $30.7 million in property taxes, it would require a $35.67 increase in the average single-family annual sewer use fee, from $71.28 to $106.55, or 50%. _4- April 28, 1993 The Fiscal Policy Committee concurs with the staff's recommendation to hold sewer use and connection fees at the current rates. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation that the Boards declare that the current 1992-93 sewer use fees and connection fees will not be increased next year and will continue at the same rates for 1993-94, provided the Governor and State Legislature do not confiscate Districts' property taxes, as follows: ANNUAL SEWER USE FEES - 1993-94 District Single-Family Multi-Family Non-Residential No. Residential Residential Properties 1 $ 83.24 $49.94/Unit $59.52/1,000 SF 2 71 .52 42.91/Unit 51.14/1,000 SF 3 73.89 44.33/Unit 52.83/1,000 SF 5 96.75 58.05/Unit 69.18/1,000 SF 6 76.47 45.88/Unit 54.68/1,000 SF 7 50.09 30.05/Unit 35.81/1 ,000 SF 11 60.00 36.00/Unit 42.90/1,000 SF 13 100.00 60.00/Unit 71 .50/1,000 SF 14 NONE - District No. 14 is fully funded by IRWD CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION FEES - 1993-94 DISTRICTS NOS. 1 . 2. 3. 4. 6, 7. 11 & 13 RESIDENTIAL: $2,350/DWELLING UNIT NON-RESIDENTIAL: $470/1,000 SQUARE FEET, $2,350 MINIMUM DISTRICT NO. 14 NONE - District No. 14 is fully funded by IRWD. -5- April 28, 1993 ' D. Adjustment of Source Control Administrative Fees. Non- Compliance Semolina Fees and Miscellaneous Charges and Fees. Sewer use and connection fees, the major source of fee revenue for the Districts, are established by ordinance adopted by the Boards. Separate and apart from these fees is an ordinance that establishes miscellaneous fees and charges for administering the Districts' Source Control Program. These include fees for wastewater discharge permits, treatment and disposal of trucked wastes, fees for the collection and processing of water consumption and tax data, and fees for sampling non-compliant dischargers. Staff has reviewed these fees that are intended to recover certain costs of administering the Source Control Program and determined that they are not recovering the current costs due to new requirements and program changes, and a recommendation to recover heretofore unrecovered capital costs for out-of-district waste-haulers. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends that the fee ordinance for Miscellaneous Source Control Program costs be amended to establish the fees in an amount required to recover current costs. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Fiscal Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee and recommends that staff and General Counsel be directed to draft an amendment to the Districts' Ordinance Establishing Source Control Fees,Administrative Fees,Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges for introduction and first reading at the regular June meeting of the Boards of Directors, to adjust or establish said fees in the amounts determined necessary to recover the Districts' costs. (Said fees are shown on Tables I and II of the enclosed Staff Report.) E. aor est to Consider Modified Sewer Connection Fees for Low Income/Senior Citizen Projects. At the April 14th meeting, the District No. 3 Directors considered -6- ` April 28, 1993 a request from District 3 Chairman Sal Sapien for reduced connection fees for the Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton. After a lengthy discussion regarding the equitability of connection fees, and the need for lower priced housing, the matter was deemed a Districts' policy issue and referred to the Fiscal Policy Committee for further consideration. The Fiscal Policy Committee discussed the issue at considerable length and concluded the following: • The purpose of the connection fee is that those placing a demand on the system should pay for it. • There is not necessarily a relationship between the size of a dwelling and its occupancy and, therefore, the demand placed on the sewerage system. • Lowering connection fees for one user shifts the cost of capital facilities to other users. Reducing connection fees for one project would result in higher fees for other projects or higher debt issues, thereby raising annual charges which service debt and are paid by everyone. • In the future, as additional senior facilities are constructed in response to this area's and the country's aging population, the shift would worsen, the day of reckoning would simply be delayed and new or increased taxes/user fees would ultimately be required. • A reduction in connection fees would not produce a significant change in the development's project costs. For instance, for the Park Stanton project, a $500 reduction in connection fees would save $167,500, or 0.7% of the project's estimated total cost of $23,000,000. • Other similar projects that paid the full connection fee have been built in many cities, and it would be discriminatory to now reduce fees for such new projects. To date, no requested fee adjustments have been approved. -7- April 28, 1993 • Members were concerned about a general policy which may lead to much higher administrative costs; for instance, each project would have to be monitored by staff. Some low income projects revert after a number of years to a different status which may not include low income provisions. Members were concerned that the administrative costs may be excessive to monitor such a program. For the above reasons,the Fiscal Policy Committee recommended that no further study be given to the issue of modifying sewer connection fees and that no change be made to the existing policy. The Executive Committee entered into a lengthy discussion of the issues pertaining to granting fee reductions for low income/senior citizen housing projects. District 3 Chairman Sapien, questioned why the matter had been referred to the Fiscal Policy Committee. He observed that the original request for a reduction of the sewer connection fee for the Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton had been submitted to District 3 which had not yet had a chance to consider it because it had been sent to the Committee. He further observed his request was not a request for a permanent policy change and urged that it simply be referred back to District 3 to consider if it wishes to grant the request. Joint Chairman Mahoney, stated that it was the Boards practice to refer Issues for Joint Districts review if they potentially have Districts'-wide implications. Because the connection fee policy is a uniform policy adopted by all Districts, and because if variances are granted to one property it would shift portions of the capital financing obligation to all other properties, it was deemed appropriate for the Fiscal Policy Committee, on which all Districts are represented,to review the matter from a Districts'-wide policy perspective. Supervisor Stanton commented on various types of low income and senior citizen projects and observed that the Boards, individually or jointly, could grant such requests for fee adjustments and not necessarily set a broad precedent for other -8- April 28, 1993 projects. He urged that the Directors follow a policy that would allow the flexibility of considering, on a case-by-case basis, and granting, if warranted, requests for financial relief in the form of connection fee reductions for worthwhile projects. In response to a request from Director Swan regarding the legality of selective fee reductions, the General Counsel reported that Federal and State facilities construction grant regulations, which the Districts are subject to, provide that all users of a sewerage system be required to pay their proportionate share of the costs of said system and that it could potentially be held that selective reductions of fees may violate that requirement and jeopardize the Districts' grant monies. Although it was the consensus of the Executive Committee to support the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation that no further study be given to this issue of modifying sewer connection fees and that no change be made to the existing policy, it was also pointed out that the Chairman or a Board Member of District 3 could request that the issue of connection fee adjustments for low income/senior citizen projects, or the specific request to reduce the connection fee for the Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments, be agendized for the May regular Board Meeting for District 3. District 3 Chairman Sapien and some other District 3 Directors indicated their desire to do so. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation that no further study be given to the issue of modifying sewer connection fees and that no change made to the existing policy that does not allow fee adjustments. Directors Lazio, Sapien and Stanton requested that their votes in opposition to the recommendation be made a matter of record. F. 1993 Summer Work Program Summary, For several years, the Boards have authorized a summer work program which allows us to complete backlogged routine painting, -9- April 28, 1993 `/ groundskeepingand general cleanup work which can best be done in the warm summer months when temporary help (mostly students) is available. Staff is recommending continuation of the summer work program for 1993. The estimated cost is $225,000 for materials, supplies and wages for 38 part-time helpers from May 24, 1993, through September 24, 1993. Our Maintenance Department has determined that the summer work program saves approximately $150,000 annually from what it would cost to perform the equivalent amount of work with full-time, permanent 'staff. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends approval of the program for 1993. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation that the summer work program for 1993 be authorized. G. Uraina Eauitable Allocation of Prooertv Taxes and State Su000rt for School Fundina in all California Counties Before Consideration of Further Property Tax Shifts, Director Swan reported that he was active in a coalition of public agencies and private Interests that is working on strategies pertaining to the State's proposal to further shift property taxes from counties, cities and special districts to schools, and is urging the State to first correct a situation that has resulted in an unfair and inequitable allocation of property taxes for school funding that currently exists in Orange County and some others because of Proposition 13 and the Serrano Priest decision Isee blue-colored summary enclosed with Fiscal Policy Committee Report). Because of this Orange County's schools currently receive approximately $50 million less in taxes and State school funding support than the State-wide average. Director Swan underscoredthe unfairness and inequity in this and urged that the Directors take a position that before any further property tax shifts from counties, cities and special districts to -10. April 28, 1993 schools are considered, equitable allocation of school property taxes and State school funding support be achieved in all California counties. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee recommends that the Boards of Directors adopt a resolution urging that no further shift of property taxes from counties, cities and special districts to fund schools be considered until the following goals have been met: That no county in California be asked to contribute any additional amount of its 1 % ad valorem property tax to fund K-14 education until all counties in the state match that county's level of contribution of the 1 % ad valorem property tax; and, That all publicly-funded school systems in each county contributing at least 40% of its property tax to education will, at a minimum, receive the State Average Daily Attendance funding per student. The staff was directed to draft a resolution and place it on the agenda for the regular May meeting of the Joint Boards for consideration by the Directors. 2) Districts' Two-Way Radio System/County-Wide 800 MHz Radio System. At the March 10th Joint Board meeting, following a discussion of the Districts' two-way radio system, vis-a-vis the county-wide 800 MHz system, the Directors deferred consideration of the proposed Purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment (Specification No. E-227) pending a staff review and report on the appropriateness of the Districts' participating in the county-wide 800 MHz system. Staff reviewed the enclosed separate report (white). Because of the many unknowns, at this stage, pertaining to the new county-wide 800 MHz system implementation and their affect on the potentially significant impacts on the Districts' two-way radio communication needs, staff has concluded that there _11_ April 28, 1993 is insufficient information to enable a knowledgeable determination on participation in the new 800 MHz system at this time. Staff, therefore, recommended that the Districts continue to monitor the development of the County-wide 800 MHz System until more information is available and then report back to the Directors; and that, in the interim, the Districts should maintain the existing 453 MHz System to meet current needs. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the staff and recommends the following actions: (1) Continue to monitor the progress and development of the proposed new County-Wide 800 MHz Radio System and upon receipt of additional information assess the advisability of the Districts' participation in the system and report back to the Boards; and, in the interim, continue to maintain the Districts' existing 453 MHz Two-Way Radio System in a state of readiness and repair to meet the Districts' day-to-day and emergency radio communications needs. (2) Approve Purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment (Specification No. E- 227) from Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc., in the amount of $38,383.00, plus sales tax, for new and replacement equipment for `r the existing system. (This is the action that was deferred by the Boards at the regular March 10, 1993 meeting pending a report on the 800 MHz system.) 3) Status Reoort Re Central Power Generation System Proiects. Staff provided the Committee with a verbal status report on progress towards completion of the Central Power Generation System projects at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. JWS:eyr Enclosures wpdoc\9mku c93%063893.ecm -12- �I CouNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS April 22, 1993 Revised n ORANGE C0U1RY. CAgFONNIA ,pBY EW6.YfNIIE aO wx am fO11MNN VY1EY.Cplleamlla 92]28B12) `� p141 Yn22.11 REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE Meeting Date: April 21 . 1993 FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel James V. Evans Ralph Hurst, Robert F. Driver Associates Don Griffin Don McLean, Robert F. Driver Associates John Gullixson Iry Pickler STAFF PRESENT James Wahner Grace Winchell J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Evelyn Hart Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Peer Swan Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel ABSENT: Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance None. Robert J. Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations \� Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager Margie Nellor, Source Control Manager Jim Wybenga, Principal Environmental Specialist 1 . 1990-92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND INTEREST RATE MONITORING. The financing team continues to monitor the interest cost and investment earnings of the 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program, Series A, B and C Certificates of Participation (COP) issues and to provide periodic reports to the Directors. The Committee reviewed a staff report providing the details for the following summary: Total Net True COP Interest Interest Interest Interest ISSUE Paid Earned (Cost) Earnings (Cost) Earninas SERIES A 5 7,051,256 $10,979,414 $3,928,157 1.7057% SERIES B 15,322,119 14,072,921 (1,249,197) (0.5827%) SERIES 1,319.739 1 ,755.856 436,117 3.3319% ��/ COMBINED $23.693.114 $26.808.191 $3.115.077 1.3614% Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 2 April 22, 1993 Although we have borrowed approximately $316 million since late 1990, we have actually realized a $3,115,077 (1 .36%) interest earnings to date. 2. STRATEGY FOR FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP (1993 SWAP). At the regular April Joint Board meeting, the Directors authorized preliminary work to proceed on structuring a fixed-to-floating interest rate SWAP (1993 SWAP), subject to final authorization to conduct the transaction by the Boards. The estimated annual earnings from this transaction range between $1 and $4 million. Accordingly, the financing team, consisting of Districts' staff, Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber, have been working closely with both rating agencies, Standard and Poor's and Moody's, towards the development of a 1993 fixed-to-floating rate SWAP strategy. Discussions with both agencies have focused on the Districts' 10-year projections of user fees, cash reserves, and debt service coverage. Staff reported that Standard and Poor's (S&P) will use the Districts' cash flow projections to decide on the extent to which the Districts may proceed with a fixed-to-floating rate SWAP, which increases the Districts' variable interest rate exposure. S&P is focusing on the Districts' strong financial management as evidenced by 10-year cash flows demonstrating stable and increasing user fees commensurate with anticipated budget requirements, consistent and ascending cash reserves, and sufficient debt obligation coverages as required by our COP covenants. (See cash flows included under Item 6.) Moody's has not yet indicated whether they will participate in these planning discussions. Since the Directors will be considering FY 93-94 user and connection fee requirements (see Item 6) and bond counsel (see Item 4) between now and the regular May 12 Joint Board meeting, it is appropriate to delay consideration of the 1993 SWAP to await the outcomes of these decisions by the Boards before concluding discussions with the rating Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 3 April 22, 1993 agencies. Staff will return in May to the Committee with a recommended 1993 SWAP strategy and structure for consideration, as well as compensation arrangements for Merrill Lynch, PaineWebber and bond counsel. 3. ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION. 1993 SERIES 1 . At the April Joint Board meeting, the Directors authorized preliminary work to proceed on structuring the Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series 1 , subject to final authorization to conduct the transaction by the Boards, and once a targeted 3% savings level is achieved. The transaction would achieve at least a $2.5 million interest cost savings once the targeted 3% savings level is achieved. Staff reported that they and Merrill Lynch have been monitoring recently declining municipal interest rates to determine if it would be advantageous to refund the remaining 1990-92 Series B COPs. The market has worsened since the March Fiscal Policy Committee, making an advance refunding of the remaining Series B less attractive. However, a number of key market strategists continue to expect long- term interest rates to decline further this year. Such movement would then allow the Districts to proceed with an advance refunding which would achieve the targeted 3% savings. The enclosed report (green) indicates that the market was between 72 and 87 basis points away from the 3% targeted savings level in early April. It is about 10 basis points closer today. Staff, Merrill Lynch, bond counsel and underwriter's counsel will to continue to monitor market performance and will proceed with preliminary steps to structure and bring to market the Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series 1 , once the 3% level is achieved, probably in June or July. Since the Directors will be considering bond counsel between now and the regular May 12 Joint Board meeting (see Item 4), it is appropriate to delay consideration of the transaction awaiting the outcome of �1 Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 4 April 22, 1993 this decision by the Boards. Staff will return in May to the Committee with an update and any recommended 1993 refunding actions for approval, as well as compensation arrangements for Merrill Lynch and bond counsel. Staff also has submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board the enclosed March 25, 1993 letter (gold), requesting consideration of refinancing of a 1990-92 Series B term bond with State Revolving Fund (SRF) bonds. The interest rate would be one-half of the state general obligation bond rate (currently less than 2%). The state intends to respond to our request at its June 1993 hearing. 4. SELECTION OF FIRMS TO PROVIDE BOND COUNSEL AND UNDERWRITER'S COUNSEL SERVICES. The Joint Boards directed staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services for Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993, Series 1 , and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP), for consideration by the Fiscal Policy Committee at this meeting. General Counsel has reviewed the qualifications of several bond counsel firms to provide special bond counsel services for both potential transactions. General Counsel reviewed the enclosed (gray) April 7, 1993 memorandum summarizing his review discussions and proposals from several firms. A copy of the 1992 California bond counsel rankings is also enclosed (pink). Recommended Action The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends: 1 . That the Boards select Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to serve as special bond counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series 1 , and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP). A service and compensation agreement will be considered at a later meeting. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 5 April 22, 1993 2. That the Boards select Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin as special co-bond counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series 1 , and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP, (1993 SWAP). A service and compensation agreement will be considered at a later meeting. 3. That the Boards request the law firms of either Brown & Wood or Jones, Hall, Hill & White to serve as underwriter's counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series. (The Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP [1993 SWAP] does not require underwriter's counsel, since it is not a public offering.) 5. POTENTIAL OWNER CONTROLLED WRAP-UP INSURANCE PROGRAM. Districts' staff and insurance broker, Robert F. Driver Associates, have worked closely to prepare a new Districts'.insurance program concept which they presented for consideration by the Committee. The concept, referred to as an Owner-Controlled Wrap-up Insurance Program, is a centralized and coordinated insurance and loss prevention program that provides coverages for job site construction and contractor risk for all participating parties. Wrap-up insurance coverages include workers' compensation, general liability, excess liability, excess automobile and project errors and omissions. Implementation of such a program by the Districts would require specific approval by the State Legislature. The Districts' Risk Management Task Force is also currently reviewing the proposed program. Based on a $200 million Districts' construction program during three years (1993/94 - 1995/96), it is estimated that the Districts could realize approximately $2,528,000 in projected insurance cost savings over the three years. The Committee, staff and consultants reviewed the concept at length using the enclosed bound report on the program's advantages, expected cost savings, management of a successful wrap-up program, and first steps to forming a wrap-up program. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 6 April 22, 1993 Recommended Actions The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends: 1 . Staff and general counsel be authorized to take steps necessary to seek approval by the State Legislature. 3. Staff and Robert F. Driver Associates return to the Fiscal Policy Committee with a draft of program details, staffing and other costs, and an implementation schedule for further consideration. 6. 1993-94 SEWER USE AND CONNECTION FEE RECOMMENDATIONS. Each property connected to a sewer system in each of the Districts, except District No. 14, pays an annual sewer use fee which partially finances operating, maintenance, replacement (OM&R) costs and debt service used to fund sewerage system improvements. (Properties in District No. 14 are billed by the IRWD.) Each District, except District No. 13, also receives a share of the ad valorem property tax which is applied to debt service. New development must pay a one-time sewer connection fee which finances capital expansion of the sewerage system. Again, District No. 14 is the exception because IRWD pays its share of capital expansion. Last year, because of the poor economic climate, staff recommended and the Boards agreed not to increase user or connection fees over the 1991-92 rates. In order to do this, certain Districts' programs were scaled back. Subsequently, the Governor and State Legislature confiscated a portion of the Districts' property taxes and shifted them to help finance schools. After lengthy deliberations, the Boards concluded that they had no really viable alternative but to increase the user fees to make up for the confiscation of property taxes by the State. Again this year, the State has proposed confiscating the balance of the Districts' historical share of the property tax. Whether that happens and the extent of the confiscation are not known at this time, and will not be known before budgets must be completed for 1993-94. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 7 April 22, 1993 Economic conditions have generally not improved. Although the Districts enjoy the ability to increase fees to pay for the rising costs of wastewater services, the staff is sensitive to the continuing economic situation and the very difficult financial problems our members agencies are struggling with, exacerbated by the state's reduction of revenues at other levels of local government; most of which are unable to be replaced by fees. Although costs of complying with stricter environmental and public health standards continue to rise, the General Manager has directed staff to again prepare a "hold-the-line" budget for 1993-94, and is recommending that sewer use and connection fees not be increased in 1993-94. These are the same rates adopted for 1991-92 and 1992- 93, except that user fees for 1992-93 were ultimately increased for the confiscation of property taxes approved by the State in September 1992. However, if the Governor's proposal to eliminate the remainder of the Districts' property tax revenue is approved by the State Legislature, as in last year the Districts will have no alternative but to raise user fees to make up for the property tax loss. The Committee reviewed the enclosed report, dated April 15, 1993 (ivory), and preliminary summary cash flows (tan) addressing the impacts of continuing the service and connection fee rates, as well as the potential loss of remaining ad valorem property taxes. Director Swan distributed the enclosed blue package of information from another group he works with, regarding the proposed property tax shift, for the Directors' information. Recommended Action The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the Directors declare that the current 1992-93 sewer use fees and connection fees will not be increased next year and will continue at the same rates for 1993-94, provided the Governor and State Legislature do not confiscate Districts' property taxes, as follows: Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 8 April 22, 1993 ANNUAL SEWER USE FEES - 1993-94 District Single-Family Multi-Family Non-Residential No. Residential Residential Properties 1 $ 83.24 $49.94/Unit $59.52/1,000 SF 2 71.52 42.91/Unit 51.14/1,000 SF 3 73.89 44.33/Unit 52.83/1,000 SF 5 96.75 58.05/Unit 69.18/1,000 SF 6 76.47 45.88/Unit 54.68/1,000 SF 7 50.09 30.05/Unit 35.8111,000 SF 11 60.00 36.00/Unit 42.90/1,000 SF 13 100.00 60.00/Unit 71.50/1,000 SF 14 NONE - District No. 14 is fully funded by IRWD CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION FEES - 1993-94 DISTRICTS NOS. 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 11 & 13 RESIDENTIAL: $2,350/DWELLING UNIT NON-RESIDENTIAL: $470/1,000 SQUARE FEET, $2,350 MINIMUM DISTRICT NO. 14 NONE - District No. 14 is fully funded by IRWD. The Committee also noted that should the balance of the Districts' property taxes be confiscated, the rates would increase between 30% and 92%. 7.(a) DISTRICTS' ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SOURCE CONTROL FEES ADMINISTRATIVE FEES. NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES. The Committee reviewed the enclosed staff report (buff) regarding potential revisions to the Ordinance Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Fees, and Miscellaneous Charges (Fee Ordinance). The fees and charges established by the Fee Ordinance pursuant to the February 7, 1992 Wastewater Discharge Regulations (WDR Ordinance) are intended to provide revenue to assist in the enforcement of the WDR Ordinance and recover costs of administering the Districts' Source Control Program, Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 9 April 22, 1993 and certain costs of operation and maintenance of the Districts' sewerage system (annual sewer use fees for industrial dischargers are direct charges pursuant to other WDR provisions). These include fees for wastewater discharge permits; fees for the treatment and disposal of trucked wastes; fees for the collection and processing of water consumption data and tax data; and fees for sampling non- compliant dischargers. An evaluation of the present fees and charges has shown that for a number of cases, revisions at this time may be appropriate to reflect the actual cost of providing services for which the fees are levied. Staff reported that the Districts' Source Control Division periodically reviews fees and charges established in the Fee Ordinance as they relate to costs associated with the pretreatment program. Based on this review, the actual costs for the following fees and charges have changed in accordance with changes in sewerage system and administrative costs: • Fees for the issuance of Class I and Class 11 Permits; • Waste hauler charges; and • Non-compliance sampling fees and analytical charges. In addition, to ensure that the full costs of the waste hauler program are recovered, two new fees should be considered for incorporation into the Districts' fee structure: • Charges for prearranged discharges to the Waste Hauler Station after regular operating hours; and • Charges for emergency discharges to the Waste Hauler Station after regular operating hours. Recommended Action The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the Directors adjust the fees according to the estimated cost increases, in order that costs would be directly recovered from the applicable users, in accordance .� with Table I and Table 11 of the staff report. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 10 April 22, 1993 7.(b) STUDY RE MODIFIED SEWER CONNECTION FEES FOR LOW INCOME/SENIOR CITIZEN PROJECTS At the Regular Board Meeting on April 14, 1993, the Directors of District No. 3 received a request for a reduction in sewer connection fees for the Park Stanton Senior Citizen Apartments within the City of Stanton. The project includes 335 affordable senior citizen apartments, located on Katella Avenue just west of Beach Boulevard. The request was made by the developer and District No. 3 Chairman Sapien. Both pointed out that this is a much-needed project to serve the growing senior population. For the Park Stanton Senior Citizen Apartment project, 30 of the 335 units are designated as Very Low Income units and the other 305 units will be available for Low to Moderate Income senior citizens. Because the units are smaller than a typical single-family dwelling, ranging from 450 square feet to 750 square feet, a reduction in the connection fee of $2,350 per dwelling unit was requested. The issue was discussed at the April Board meeting by the Directors of all of the Districts. It was deemed a policy matter and referred to the Fiscal Policy Committee for further consideration. The Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed the staff report and discussed the issues related to reducing connection fees in the context of the intent and purpose of the connection fee to finance the actual capital costs of new sewerage facilities to serve the development for which the fee is charged. In terms of financing of the needed construction and rehabilitation of the collection, treatment and disposal facilities operated by the Districts, the Directors noted that connection fees only partially finance capital projects, including sewers, the treatment facilities and the outfall system. As pointed out in the April 7, 1993 staff report on this subject (salmon copy enclosed), these capital charges are not sufficient to cover the need for new facilities, and over the last few years the Districts have issued about $400 million in debt to build needed facilities. The cost of capital facilities is not as directly related to average flows, or lower than average flows, as the operational costs of the system. Capital facilities are built for peak conditions and can be more closely charged on a per-dwelling unit basis than operational costs, (financed by user fees) which are reduced by lower flows. The Committee also noted the following: Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 11 April 22, 1993 • The purpose of the connection fee is that those placing a demand on the system shall pay for it. • There is not necessarily a relationship between the size of a dwelling and its occupancy and, therefore, the demand place on the sewerage system. • Lowering connection fees for users shifts the cost of capital facilities to other users. Reducing connection fees for one project would result in higher fees for other projects or high debt issues, thereby raising annual charges which service debt and are paid by everyone. • In the future, as additional senior facilities are constructed in response to this area's and the country's aging population, the shift would worsen, the day of reckoning would simply be delayed, and that new or increased taxes/user fees would ultimately be required. • A reduction in connection fees would not produce a significant change in the development's project costs. For instance, for the Park Stanton project, a $500 reduction in connection fees would save $167,500, .7% of the project's estimated total cost of $23,000,000. • Other similar projects that paid the full connection fee have been built in many cities, and it would be discriminatory to now reduce fees for such new projects. To date, no requested fee adjustments have been approved. • Members were concerned about general policy which may lead to much higher administrative costs; for instance, each project would have to be monitored by staff. Some low income projects revert after a number of years to a different status which may not include low income provisions. Members were concerned that the administrative costs may be excessive to monitor such a program. r Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 12 April 22, 1993 Recommendation For the above reasons, the Fiscal Policy Committee recommends that no further study be given to this issue of modifying sewer connection fees and that no change be made to the existing policy. B. CORF 1993-94 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS. The "2020 VISION" Master Plan adopted by the Directors in 1989 provided a schedule of facilities needed to meet projected wastewater treatment needs for thirty years. Each year these projections are reevaluated by staff in light of current flow requirements, required levels of treatment, both in terms of compliance with higher environmental standards imposed by regulatory agencies as well as growth within the service area, and economic conditions, and a 10-year capital outlay revolving fund )CORF) budget for jointly owned treatment facilities is prepared. The preliminary 1993-94 CORF Budget presented for the Committee's consideration amounts to $70.0 million, down from $80.6 million for 1992-93, and from $114.1 million for 1991-92 The Committee reviewed two draft preliminary estimates of the 1993-94 CORF construction budget, including 10-year projections and costs to complete the master-planned facilities, and directed staff to include the approved preliminary CORF Budget for 1993-94 in the Joint Works Budget to be considered by the Committee at the May meeting. 9. PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS. During the annual budget preparation process, the staff evaluates personnel requirements for the upcoming and future fiscal years. This review of staffing needs takes into consideration programs set forth in the Boards' 30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan, "2020 VISION," adopted by the Directors in 1989, anticipated new or expanded regulations and programmatic changes, the start up of new facilities and the ongoing maintenance and operation of the existing joint works treatment facilities and the individual Districts' collection systems. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 13 April 22, 1993 Last year, the Directors adopted a personnel budget with a decrease of five authorized positions. For 1993-94, staff is proposing a further net reduction of one authorized position at an estimated annual savings of $42,732. The Committee reviewed a staff report detailing the proposed changes, and directed staff to include the changes in the Joint Works Operating Budget to be considered at the May Committee meeting. 10, PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN DAILY EFFORT (PRIDE). The Committee reviewed several PRIDE suggestions that staff had submitted for consideration and evaluation. Certificates and cash awards totaling $4,856.30, in accordance with the Board-approved PRIDE program were approved. These ten PRIDE proposals are estimated to save the Districts approximately $62,035. 11 . 1993 SUMMER WORK PROGRAM. For several years, the Boards have authorized a summer work program which allows us to complete backlogged routine painting, groundskeeping and general cleanup work which can best be done in the warm summer months when temporary help (mostly students) is available. Staff has recommended continuation of the summer work program for 1993. The estimated cost is $225,000 for materials, supplies and wages for 38 part-time helpers from May 24, 1993, through September 24, 1993. Our Maintenance Department has determined that the summer work program saves approximately $150,000 annually from what it would cost to perform the equivalent amount of work with full-time, permanent staff. Recommended Action The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends that the Directors approve and authorize the summer work program for 1993 in an estimated amount of $225,000. JWS:lc \� REF:J:IN DOCTK.MTG\RFKC 21.93 Enclosures COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 c 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270E-7018 �I �44'°ecWY� (714)9822411 March 25, 1993 Mr. John P. Caffrey Acting Chairman State Water Resources Control Board 901 P. Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: SRF Loan for Interplant Pipeline, Job No. 1-9 Dear Mr. Caffrey: The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) are interested in participating in the SRF Loan Program to the maximum extent practical. The Districts, therefore, respectfully request consideration of refinancing for the Interplant Pipeline Job No. 1-9 under the provisions of Section 633(d)(2), which provides that the SRF may be used to refinance local debt obligations at or below market rates where the debt was incurred after March 7, 1985. Our debt for this project was incurred in 1991 . It is our further understanding that the refinancing of existing debt obligations are eligible to receive SRF loan funding if the project construction was initiated after October 1, 1988. The Districts began construction of the $23 million Interplant Pipeline project on September 11, 1991 . We understand that our participation in the program would be mutually beneficial. Since construction of Job No. 1-9 is scheduled for completion during May 1993, the Districts could benefit the SRF program by beginning repayment of the SRF loan by May 1993 and, as a result, much needed inflow of loan repayments to the SRF Loan Program would be provided in the near future. In addition, the Districts would agree to a shorter repayment period of 14 years (2007). The Districts would benefit from significant interest cost savings if a portion of its $117,555,000 Series B Certificates of Participation Issue dated May 7, 1991 could be refinanced under the SRF program. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA Mr. John P. Caffrey 10944 ELLIS AVENUE Ro 8OX e,n State Water Resources Control Board FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAUFORNA 9272, Page 2 March 25, 1993 We have been informed that the SRF loan program policy requires that applicants solicit the participation of Minority and Women Business Enterprises (MBE/WBE) on SRF loan projects. The Districts have not applied for state or federal financial participation since 1983 and, therefore, have not solicited MBE/WBE participation on construction projects. In our judgment, the retroactive application of MBE/WBE requirements to projects being considered for refinancing local debt is impractical. In the future, the Sanitation Districts would include MBE/WBE participation requirements for projects where SRF loans may be possible. Therefore, in order to accommodate this mutually beneficial transaction, we respectfully request that the SWRCB waive the SRF loan policy requirement for MBE/WBE participation for this project, and give favorable consideration to SRF refinancing for the Districts' Interplant Pipeline Job No. 1-9 project. Our staff would welcome the opportunity to discuss our application with the SWRCB or your staff at your convenience. Thank you for your consideration. Si rely, J. ayne ylvester G eral nager JWS:lc NE F:J:\W PDO CSU W SLLTJ W 53.8 cc: James M. Stubchaer, SWRCB Member Marc Del Piero, SWRCB Member Walt Pettit, SWRCB Harry Schueller, SWRCB Farouk Ismail, SWRCB Gary D. Hoffmann, SWRCB Gary Streed, Director of Finance Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering 1 _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Information for: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, 1993 Series I April21, 1993 l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, 1993 Series I Table of Contents HISTORICAL RATE CHART TRADITIONAL FIXED RATE ADVANCE REFUNDING TRADITIONAL REFUNDING w/ INVERSE FLOATERS SYNTHETIC FIXED RATE ADVANCE REFUNDING e . � �°'ti � `, ', � `° `. i en' e6B � � '� � i E '; ` � ' `i '� ` ��� til `; o �: +. ' }� t, r�� b � � L r6i � ,� � ���6 0 1 � i r6j��8 L � s l �'�c b � � �' �� r� £� �6/ � � � � �� � � � �� v. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series I Rates as of 04/07/93 TRADTTIOM REEUNDiNG TRU TURE )INV RS ;F.L04 CURRENT MKT CURRENT MKT as of 04/07/93 LESS 81 BP PAR AMOUNT $55,030,000 $58,030,000 GROSS SAVINGS ($735,563) $2,470,122 PV SAVINGS % -0.746% 3.011% ARBITRAGE TIC 5.663% 4.835% AVG. ANNUAL SAVINGS ($31,301 $105,112 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series I Rates as of 04/07/93 TRADITION Y;;FIXW1ZA1" N VA.( E,�I+UNDING-,STRCJCTURE >,F CURRENT MKT CURRENT MKT as of 04/07/93 LESS 87 BP PARAMOUNT $54,825,000 $58,045,000 GROSS SAVINGS ($947,066) $2,477,079 PV SAVINGS % -0.980% 3.000% ARBITRAGE TIC 5.720% 4.831% AVG. ANNUAL SAVINGS ($40,301 $105,408 v COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series I Rates as of 04/07/93 UNDINGiSTRIICTt CURRENT MKT CURRENT MKT as of 04/07/93 LESS 72 BP PARAMOUNT $55,405,000 $58,050,000 GROSS SAVINGS ($335,758) $2,486,206 PV SAVINGS % -0.308% 3.032% ARBITRAGE TIC 5.556% 4.830% AVG. ANNUAL SAVINGS ($14,288 $105,796 Soda 5e�utesJ'�attteyaltt . 992Onda� tnsel TOaRti 5.:'. The top California bond counsel firms are ranked accord- ing to the number of long-term new issues they served on in 1992. Principal Mkt. Amount Bond Counsel Issues Rank Share ($ mil.) Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 210 1 24.8% $11,303 Jones Hall Hill & White 168 2 19.8 2,791 Brown & Wood 86 3 10.1 2,130 Stradling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth 53 4 6.3 983 Best, Best & Krieger 36 5 4.2 301 Sturgis, Ness, Brunsell & Sperry 32 6 3.8 187 O'Melveny & Myers 29 7 3.4 2,890 Brown & Diven 23 8 2.7 100 Arnelle & Hasde 21 9 2.5 1,173 Pamela S. Jue, P.C. 15 10 1.8 924 COUNTY SANrrmim DISTRICTS April 15, 1993 .1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10040 ELLIB AVEWE PO BO%B127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,GLIFOANIA 92728.8121 17141952.2411 STAFF REPORT 1993-94 SEWER USE AND CONNECTION FEE RECOMMENDATIONS SUMMARY Each property connected to a sewer system in each of the Districts, except District No. 14, pays an annual sewer use fee which partially finances operating, maintenance, replacement (OM&R) costs and debt service used to fund sewerage system improvements. (Properties in District No. 14 are billed by the IRWD.) Each District, except District No. 13, also receives a share of the ad valorem property tax which is applied to debt service. New development must pay a one-time sewer connection fee which finances capital expansion of the sewerage system. Again, District No. 14 is the exception because IRWD pays its share of capital expansion. Last year, because of the poor economic climate, staff recommended and the Boards agreed not to increase user or connection fees over the 1991-92 rates. In order to do this, certain Districts' programs were scaled back. Subsequently, the Governor and State Legislature confiscated a portion of the Districts' property taxes and shifted them to help finance schools. After lengthy deliberations, the Boards concluded that they had no really viable alternative but to increase the user fees to make up for the confiscation of property taxes by the State. Again this year, the State has proposed confiscating the balance of the Districts' historical share of the property tax. Whether that happens and the extent of the confiscation are not known at this time, and will not be known before budgets must be completed for 1993-94. Economic conditions have generally not improved. Although the Districts enjoy the ability to increase fees to pay for the rising costs of wastewater services, the staff is sensitive to the continuing economic situation and the very difficult financial problems our members agencies are struggling with, exacerbated by the state's reduction of revenues at other levels of local government; most of which are unable to be replaced by fees. 1993-94 Fee Recommendations Page 2 April 15, 1993 Although costs of complying with stricter environmental and public health standards continue to rise, the General Manager has directed staff to again prepare a "hold-the-line" budget for 1993-94, and is recommending that sewer use and connection fees not be increased in 1993-94. These are the same rates adopted for 1991-92 and 1992-93, except that user fees for 1992-93 were ultimately increased for the confiscation of property taxes approved by the State in September 1992. However, if the Governor's proposal to eliminate the remainder of the Districts' property tax revenue is approved by the State Legislature, as in last year the Districts will have no alternative but to raise user fees to make up for the property tax loss. BACKGROUND During the 1980's and early 1990's, each of the Districts has had to consider the adoption of a sewer use fee for ongoing operations, maintenance and rehabilitation costs. Although property taxes, connection fees and federal and state construction grants have historically been the major sources of financing of Districts' activities, they became inadequate over the past decade. After the passage of Proposition 13, all ad valorem property tax revenue has been used in the Operating Funds for maintenance, operations and rehabilitation. Beginning in 1991-92, ad valorem property tax receipts were dedicated to be first used to repay the principal and interest due for COP issues. No property tax revenue has been directly available for capital improvements. The costs of providing service have risen beyond the ability of the property tax apportionments to keep pace with the increasingly stringent requirements of the federal, state and regional regulatory agencies for wastewater treatment to protect public health and the environment. In addition to new regulatory requirements, cost increases are also attributable to inflation, and to additional flows generated by the natural population increases from the excess of births over deaths and in-migration and additional residential, commercial and industrial development. Federal and state assistance from the clean water grant program has essentially been eliminated by Congress because of federal funding problems. 1993-94 Fee Recommendations Page 3 April 15, 1993 All Districts except Nos. 13 and 14 currently receive an allocation of the 1 % basic property tax levy equal to approximately 3% of the 1 % basic levy (i.e., $30/year on a $100,000 home). District No. 13 is fully funded by user fees and District No. 14 is fully funded by the IRWD. FUTURE FINANCING PROJECTIONS As a part of the rate setting process, staff has analyzed Statements of Projected Cash Flows for Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 prepared in accordance with the adopted "2020 VISION" Financial Plan recommendations, adjusted to reflect changing circumstances. Under the Plan, each District's share of the treatment plant construction, and its respective trunk sewer construction projects are to be financed by a combination of increased connection fees to pay for new capacity and borrowing to pay for rehabilitation and improved treatment. Debt retirement and operating and maintenance costs are to be paid by a combination of property taxes and the annual sewer use fees, under the following assumptions: 1. Renewal of NPDES Permit and Continuation of Current Treatment Levels (301 (h) Waiver) This scenario represents the minimum probable level of construction, rehabilitation and operations and maintenance costs. For the first five years of the planning period, the differences between renewal of our existing permit and full secondary treatment are not significant. Increased annual flow projections and new sewer service connections have been revised downward from the 1989 Master Plan to reflect current and expected economic development and levels of flow. 2. Connection Fees ' The capital facilities connection fee includes the cost of future and existing facilities on a per unit basis. The reason to include future costs is that any new flow will require new, additional facilities and capacity. 1993-94 Fee Recommendations Page 4 April 15, 1993 The Board-approved connection fee policy provides for an annual adjustment of fees to reflect changes in the Engineering News Record-LA construction cost index. Connection fees are uniform throughout the Districts. Staff is recommending that the fees for 1993-94 remain unchanged from the 1991-92 and 1992-93 rates of $2,350 per residential unit and $470 per 1,000 square feet of floor area for non-residential properties. A 5% per year increase is projected from 1994-95 through 2001-2002 for cash flow analysis. 3. Debt/Borrowing Over the next 10 years, all of the Districts except Nos. 13 and 14 are projected to issue additional COP-type debt to meet a portion of Joint Works treatment facilities improvements. Borrowing has been a part of.the long-range financial plan for capital improvements since 1979 when the policy of using all property tax revenues for operations, maintenance and rehabilitation was implemented. Extensive use of the now discontinued Federal and State Clean Water Grant Program enabled the Districts to stretch out their reserves and other income and to generally avoid borrowing until 1990. Three primary reasons to issue debt are: to protect and to preserve capital reserves; to avoid major increases and fluctuations in user fees from year-to-year; and to spread the cost of facilities over their useful lives. The cash flow projections include periodic COP issues to meet capital project award and cash flow requirements, and to avoid federal interest earnings restrictions and penalties. 4. Reserves As a part of the financial plan developed by the team of Directors, staff and consultants, the Boards have implemented a plan to build reserves for certain future events. The current reserve policy calls for Dry Period Funding Reserves, Contingency Reserves, Capital Project Reserves, Insurance Reserves, Environmental Requirement Reserves, and Debt Service Reserves. When an adequate funding level for these reserves has been reached, a Fee Stabilization Fund will be created. 1993-94 Fee Recommendations ' Page 5 April 15, 1993 5. Capital Improvement Projects As the Directors are aware, the Districts are continuing to experience reductions in flow from previous years. This flow reduction and the economic climate have caused staff to review the timing of the capital improvement program. Accordingly, projects for certain additional capacity and improved treatment are proposed to be delayed, resulting in the ability to postpone some COP issues. 6. Ad Valorem Property Taxes The cash flow projections are based on the continuing receipt of ad valorem property taxes at the same level as allocated by the County for 1992-93. However, the Governor's state budget submittal proposes a final shift of all remaining local property tax revenues from certain special districts which perform enterprise activities to school districts. Should the legislature ultimately implement this proposal, the revenue loss would need to be made up from i increased sewer user fees. The impact on user fees is also shown on the cash flow projections. This proposal is discussed more thoroughly later in this report. 1993-94 USER FEE RECOMMENDATIONS Taking all the above assumptions into consideration and the current and projected near-term economic climate, staff is again preparing a "hold-the- line" budget. The portion of each individual District's total operations, maintenance and COP service budget, determined largely by the Joint Operating Fund budget to operate and maintain the treatment and disposal facilities, is approximately 51 %. Keeping this significant portion of the operating budget constant and rescheduling certain capital projects, thereby minimizing additional borrowing and subsequent repayment will allow the Districts to maintain the 1992-93 user fee rates for 1993-94 subject to the final determination by the Governor and the State Legislature regarding taking of our property taxes. 1993-94 Fee Recommendations Page 6 April 15, 1993 The following table shows the single-family residential user fee rates for 1993-94 that were anticipated in September 1992 when the 1992-93 rates were adjusted for the property tax confiscation by the State, the predicted rates in the "2020 VISION" Master Plan, and the revised rates now proposed. ANNUAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USER FEES 1993-94 Anticipated When Predicted 92-93 Rates Were in 1992-93 and District Adjusted "2020 VISION" Proposed 93-94 1 $103.56 $100.00 $83.24 2 81.95 75.00 71.52 3 79.43 100.00 73.89 5 102.53 100.00 96.75 6 81.91 100.00 76.47 7 50.47 50.00 50.09 11 77.93 175.00 60.00 13 100.00 95.00 100.00 Weighted Avg. IL $90.44 $71 .28 GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX SHIFT The Governor's state budget proposal includes a $150 million shift of the remainder of local property tax revenues from certain enterprise special districts (i.e., water, sewer, solid waste, etc.) to school districts. The proposal is estimated to affect about 1 ,500 special districts statewide, including the Sanitation Districts. The Governor's budget message states, "This amount represents the current estimated amount of property tax revenue that is subsidizing enterprise functions which, by definition, should be self-supporting from charges for services." In other words, the taxes should be replaced by fees. 1993-94 Fee Recommendations Page 7 April 15, 1993 As mentioned above, under Assumption 6, the user fee rates proposed by staff were calculated by including the Districts' historical share of the property tax as a revenue item in the operating funds. Attachment A summarizes the impact of the Governor's proposal to eliminate the $30.7 million in annual property tax revenues allocated to the Districts for 1992-93. This preliminary $30.7 million that the Governor proposes to shift from the Sanitation Districts to school districts represents 20% of the preliminary operating budget which includes required reserves carried forward from year to year. However, the impact on operating revenues is far greater. The $30.7 million loss in property tax allocations would represent 31 % of the Districts' $99.4 million operating fund cash flow requirements for 1993-94. Should the Governor's proposal ultimately be adopted by the Legislature, the Districts would have no viable alternative but to increase sewer use fees to make up for the $30.7 million property tax loss. Use fees would have to be increased an average of 50% or $35.67 per year. The percentage increase in fees ranges from 30°% to 92% while the dollar increases range from $25.05 to $88.74 per year. Staff continues to monitor the Governor's proposal and will keep the Directors �./ advised. GGS:lc REF:JAS..w.F.MMMUSEFEE.3 Enclosures 1 4131/03 U 036.XLS 10:39 AM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.1 TRW 14 Reamed 4127I93 STATEMENT W PROJECTED CASH FLOW No Fee Unpa For 83-94 N6CJL YFAR91952-1903 TNROUGN 2001.2W2 Rep Tan.Cmetmt At 92-93 Level Ran,A9mry 0....... Eetimettl 5Rv TOttl 5-Yeah,T01x LINE 1B93 B3 19B}90 199484 1BB895 1996.97 1992.1997 I997-t002 1UYsw 701 LINE 1 OPERATINO FUND 1 2 9eeme.8 Cam,Over Fnrn Lear Yes 113,401,000 148.)53,000 1851395.W0 178,258.000 106.843.600 113.481.000 188,958.500 113,481.000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Uwex 1%The A600etien 30J43.000 30.743,00D 30.743.WD 30,743.000 30.743,O00 153,715,O00 153,715,0D0 307.430,000 4 6 Fees:Industrial When 5.095.000 8,29O.O00 7,797,00D 0,907,WO 10.313,O00 39.752,000 78.86D.O00 119,732.000 5 0 U.Fan 62.910.000 83,051,000 07.431.000 73.))9,O0D 80.617.000 34),)90.000 533.525,O00 691,321.WO 6 Intwaet 9 Nion-no.Inane 1AW5.OW 11,242,000 12,295,ODO 13.002,000 13.439.000 04.673.000 68.5351000 133,108.WO ) 8 Troutw tract,COP F6M. 2.BG9,OW 3.213,000 2.874,000 2.919,000 3,001,000 14,530,000 15,<O9.OW 30,205,000 8 9 Other Re-nu. 3,463,000 0 0 0 0 3,483.000 0 3.483.000 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 120.423.O00 115,029.000 120.840.000 129.37D.U00 1U.1)3,000 523,835.000 881.424,000 1.485,259,WO 10 11 TOTAL AVAIIABEWROING 233.904.O00 284,7112.000 208.23S.000 307.828,00D 324,016,54X) 737.316.00 1,050.380.500 1.598.740.00D 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Shot.x Jaunt Wrote M A O 47,IM,OOO 49.048.W0 53,513,000 58,065,000 64.751.00O 272.915,000 434.857,000 707J72,000 13 14 CMrmhor SWtem M 60 n8 Other Oper. 11,316,000 12.585.W0 13,928,000 11.092.00t) 11.572.000 01,094,000 87.301,000 128.395,000 14 IS COP Servos 25,697,O00 38.154,0DO 40.535,O00 50,227,500 59.)3).WO 214.390.500 343,200.000 557,550,500 15 10 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 84,151,000 99,387.WO 107,077,000 120.704.500 136,050,000 548,359,500 845,364.00O 1,393,723,600 18 17 Reserve.6 Owry-Ovw to Neat Year 149.753.WO I65.395,000 178,258.WD IB6,843.600 188.856.500 16e,960,600 206.D36,500 205015,500 17 19 Next Year's Dm Forma Furvlinp Remosimnb 41,365.000 48.800,000 531201,WD 59,660.O00 67.12QW0 67.126,000 92,838,000 92.530,000 IB 19 ]O%Ceo9o9ern,Far lean COP wviul 11.695.WO 12.252,600 13,494.400 14,116.2W 15.3)1,W0 15,3)1,OW 2].91],5W 23.81310W 19 20 Fortieth of lnurame Fare,Urplos or Krelici0 OL703.Or 104,182.4W 111.562.600 113.1A.3W IW.459.SW IW,558,8W B8,6B],9W B8,663.9. 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 SiWirr Fernih Resitlmu Lear Fee 171.29 171.29 175.16 I63.19 $90.67 1138.25 22 22.1 SFR Fee 98L93 Than Are Rust OV Fees 1105.95 9111.72 e118.56 1125.85 1172.42 22.1 22.2 6FR Fort From 2020 Visitors Mssompan 190.48 $91.27 1112.58 1112.04 41MA2 22.2 23 Numher of EAuivalenl 0weilirq Umt. 860,221 8811991 804.400 867,816 071.481 B99,881 23 24 Exime.el Um Fen,Excu6e.IFWD 01.318.000 01,451,000 65.831.000 )2.1)9.000 )9.01),00O 124.414.OW 24 4127/93 CF 9MALIF 10:39 AM COUNTY SAMTATNIN 01 CT NO.1 THBU 14 8wiav44/2T013 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW P .2 FISCAL YEARS 1992 1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002 E.11.m S-Year Tad SYw Tdd NNE 1992.93 1993-M t994-95 1995.96 IM-97 199?1997 1997Q002 IOY..TOtd UNE 25 CAPITAL FUND(S) 25 26 R —.&C.,.—.Emn Wt Y.. 180583,000 198.820.00D 221.235.DOO 245,934,550 280.198.050 188.503.000 201.890.700 168,563.000 26 27 1 ENUE 27 28 Cme&uct,m mama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 29 F.. Cmiwcem 4.162.000 5.676.000 7.930.000 10,011,000 12A47.000 40.7M.00O 95.897.000 136.022.000 28 30 . ..md Wwt. 2.3".000 2,505.000 2,674,000 g855,000 3.051.000 13.433.00D 18,095.000 32,180,000 30 31 U..F.. 8.000.000 8,400,000 10,200,000 5.500.000 4.700.000 3Q800.000 8.500.000 45,300.000 31 32 Sda 01 C. ..iry RgHU 1.303.000 1,421,000 744,000 2,033.000 2,917,000 8,318.000 2.226,000 10,544.000 32 33 Avyxstien Faaa 500.000 0 O 0 0 600,000 0 500.000 33 34 W.,..BMiacvllmswalncmro 13.1%.000 151094.000 I6.79I.ODO 18,193,000 19.483.000 82]45,000 88.855.000 171601,000 m 35 TTmd.P�me sOem COP F.d 76.315.000 86.580,000 94.785.550 101,318.600 88.220,650 447,200,700 787.950 417,980.050 35 36 OtM Rw.q. 9.787.000 1.400.000 500.000 2.585,000 0 14272000 8.000 14.280.000 >8 37 TOTAL REVENUE 114.600.000 121.075.000 133,MM,%O 142.490,500 132218.650 843,994,700 215.028.950 849,023.850 37 30 TOTAL AVAILA81E FUNDING 283.180,000 319.895.000 354.939.550 398,431,050 392A04700 812.657700 4 918,850 1.027.500.650 38 39 EXPENOITUIRS 39 40 Use M Jain Wm4a Teatmmt%mt 80.000.000 70.031,OD0 62,427,000 99,905,000 89,130,000 401,493,000 182,981.060 5&4474.000 40 41 Uu.d C~..Synam 18,302,ODO 22,429.000 25,I08,000 24.553.000 201186.000 113.744000 73.773.000 187.521,000 41 42 OIM1m 8.041.000 1,200,000 1,200.000 3.785.000 1,200,000 15.420,000 8000000 21426,000 42 43 TOTAL C% MDITWES O4.343.000 98,BBO,000 108.905,000 128.243.000 110,516,000 530.967.000 262764000 793,421,000 43 44 Ce td&Em4m.W Rq Nmww 198,820.000 221.235.000 245.9N.550 280.188,050 281,090.700 281,880.700 234,105550 234,166.550 44 45 S .d 100000.000 C.P"Nmmv. 1Og000,000 100,0D0,000 100,000.000 100,000,000 100.000.000 100,000.000 100,000.000 100,000,000 45 45 M..d 410.000,000 Ewi,.n R..we W..800,000 11.235.000 35.934.550 10.080.050 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 46 47 Pm d.wun..Re.Sm9.a w 10..nI 88,820,000 n1.235.000 1J5.93a,550 150.189.060 1T1.890. 1T169OT00 Ilia,165,850 124,165.850 47 40 Sm&Fatly RwNnw Cmmc6.n F.. $2.350 32,350 $2,470 $2.590 $2.720 $3.480 48 49 Nwm m d Now E9uivalmt Owdliq Udta 1,770 2,415 3,210 3.065 4.260 0.575 48 50 E.im WCmnactmn Fm In— 04,150,000 85.675.00D $7.929.000 a10,010,000 112.947,000 622,981.00D 50 I 4127183 6 93B.XL5 10.39 AM C COUNTY SANITATION DISTNCT NO.1 THRO 14 Nwi%W 4127193 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED T 514 TIM Pe90 3 FISCAL MRS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2001-2002 &Yw TOW &Yew Teal LINE IB9DB3 188&94 199L95 199586 1900.07 19021087 I907-2002 1O,Ywx TOW LINE 51 Dow FUND151 51 62 Reewvse 6 CNMOvW Fan Loot Yew 22.000 20.000 17.000 14.000 12.000 22,000 10.00D 22,000 52 63 IEVENUE 53 54 TOF Levy 12,000 12,000 12,000 13,000 13.000 62.000 28.000 90.000 54 55 Leven to 5ecNlnews lncwne 2.000 11000 1.000 1,000 1.000 01000 1.000 YO00 05 56 OIHer Nooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 57 TOTALREENUE 14,M 13.000 13,000 14,000 14,000 6BWD 28.000 STAN 57 56 TOTAL AVAMBIE FUNDING 36.OD0 3],OOD 30,000 38.000 20,000 90000 30.000 II91000 58 59 EXPENDITURES 58 00 BwN PrleripN 0lntrest I6,000 16.000 15,000 16,000 16,000 00.000 31,000 111.00U 00 51 Trnmr Ip CgitM FrArb 0 0 O 0 0 0 8.000 81000 61 82 T0TAL EXPIRI TUIE6 18.000 10000 16,000 16,000 10000 00.000 38.000 119,000 62 63 Reservx B CwM-Ovw to Not Yew 20.000 17,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 10.000 0 0 63 54 Next Yew's Dry Poria6 Neel o Reewemenls 20 W0 1),OOD 14.000 121000 101000 10,000 0 0 64 55 FUM BNncs w IDNicol 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 60 cm LANDS 06 57 Rwwvw 6 Cwq.m&Frern Loot Yew 33,446,000 60.193.650 40.908.650 44,823.100 49.03.600 33.446,000 52,932.950 331445oOOD 07 69 REVENUE Be 68 New Boo-ot9 113,750,000 54,5001000 IO1.00O000 IIIW0,000 88.000,000 481,250,000 0 481.25(LO00 00 70 Invrw A Olin 210091000 3,213.000 2.574.000 2.S%9.000 3.061.000 14,536,000 13.658.000 30,205,000 70 71 Total Nevnue I 6.fi1B.000 8)]1300D 105.5)4.000 113818,000 101.061.000 505J86.000 15,669.000 521o55,000 71 72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 150.065.000 133.905,650 147.402.650 158.742.100 150,114,600 539.232.000 68,001.850 55419011000 72 73 EXPENDITURES 73 74 ggect Cam Trwetere to UNtal Faoseoe Furr0 75.315.000 88.5801000 84J05.550 101,318.500 80.220.850 447.200,700 )0),960 447,988,550 74 75 Mtwot EnneB Trnslne to Owe9rN FP 2.889,000 3.213.000 2,574,000 218181000 3,081.000 14,530,000 15.6691000 30,205.000 75 75 Con of bwnn 5,087,350 3.225,000 6.200.000 5.550,000 4,900.000 24,502.350 0 24.502.350 70 )) Other 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O A 78 Total EFpereit,os 63.071.350 93.010.000 102.538.550 109.888,900 B),I81.840 4e8,299050 16,456950 502,750.00D )e )9 Rsewvoo O Cww-was to Next Yew 66.193,050 40,880.050 44,923.100 49,053.600 52.032.950 52.932,950 $2.145.000 52,145.000 79 80 Rqu'seE boost Swice Romves 33.270.000 38.495,000 41,085.000 47.245000 12,115.ON 61,145.000 52,145,000 52.I4500D 80 81 FurN Oelrtow 32.923.050 4.393.850 3,228.IOD 1.808500 )0).850 )8).96 0 D 01 4121193 CF 93B.XL5 10:39 AM COUNTY SANITATION OHITRICT NO.1 THRV 14 Restated V27193 STATEMEIIT OF F ECTED CASH FLOW page 4 NSCAL MRS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002 8•Yau Tet! o-Yeer T. LINE 199203 109156 1094-98 198696 1998-97 1992.1997 1997-2002 iOYeer TOW UK 02 SUMMARY 82 93 Wwrvw 5 C.,Over From Last Year 316.612.000 414,790.660 427.535.650 469,129.650 496.097.150 316.512,000 523.790.150 315.512.000 93 04 Tottl Revenue 351.668.000 303,830.000 381031.38D 398.899.500 371408650 1 ))3.403700 1.092150950 2,805,934,860 64 05 Total AveilaNe Fualarg 687.188,000 715,616.E50 788,58).200 854,929,180 W,N3,800 2.089.195,700 1,015,941.100 9,IB1,N6A60 86 06 Total E.,.itu,e. 252.361350 291OBt000 319.437.550 350.732.000 343))3650 1.505.400.550 1.124.813,950 2,690,019.600 N 87 Reserves 6 Carry Over to Nat Year 414,086,680 4]),835650 409.129.050 490.09).150 523.790,150 $23.790.150 491,327,150 491.327.150 87 RESERVES ANALYSIS BB Nat Yeeir Dry Parcel Funeral Roauaammw 41,318.000 48.9)),000 53,215,000 59.882.000 67,136,000 87,136,000 92.539,000 92.839.000 as 09 Contingence,Reaerver.20%ol Opm Reins 11.696.000 12,232,600 12,494,400 14.110.200 15,])1,000 15,271,000 23.813.600 23,813,600 as 90 0.Service Reserve.seal Food Se1wes 06.193.550 40.586.660 44.923.100 49.053.600 32,932,960 52,932,950 52,143,000 52,145,000 90 91 Cattails,Removes.Share 014100.000,000 100.00D.000 100.000.000 100.000.000 Io0000.o00 100.000.000 1o0,000,000 100.000.000 100,0001000 91 92 Enwnmrntal Rag Re.,above.1110.000.000 10,000OOO 10.000,000 10,000.000 101000.000 10.000.000 10,000,ODD 10.000'000 10,0oGoo0 92 93 Insuwca Flat nveal Op., .ACOI IS3.323.000 21841)60D 24),49).160 203.365.380 278,450,200 276460200 MAMBO 212920850 93 94 Appaprie.e6 Reserves 414.786.850 427.535,660 469,129.650 496,097,150 523,700,150 523.790,160 491,32),150 481,327.150 94 95 Unrpwopi..Nwrvaa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06 96 Total Wrnvsa 414.706.850 427.535.S50 469,129,650 496,097.150 523.790,150 523,700,160 49132),150 491.327,150 90 DEBT SERVICE RATIOS 97 Sanirn 1im Cwerpe,M'mimum 1.25 5.20 3.27 3.08 4.32 4.52 5.26 97 98 Su vIdineta Use Caere,.,Minimum 1.00 3.07 1 81 1.82 1.03 1.46 1.44 98 99 A6Jiturad Bahl Test 1 Sr 6 Sub I.Minimum 1.25 2.61 2.08 1.90 1.59 1.40 1.52 99 4127/93 Page 1 RESERVES BAIANCES ANALYSIS No A...Changes Fr 93-94 PROJECTED CASH FLOWS R6Pxry Taxes Comlent At 92-93 Uval 9FASEO 4427.93 pit 199293 1993-M 1994-05 1995W96 1996w8T 1997-98 1998.99 1999,2M 200401 2001v02 DISTRICT NO 1 18 Next Yw'.Ory Period Funding Regibernants 4.176.000 5.129,000 5.272.000 5.947AW 6,730,000 71512.000 7,683.WD 8.268.WD 8,738.000 9,213,01EK, 19 Contingenry Reeervea.20%o1 Opr R9mts 1.044.000 1,074.000 1,115,WO 1.285.000 1.407.030 1.540.000 1.886,000 1,847,000 2,023.00) 2.216.00D 20 Inarmu Reserves.-OpreBng 8,053,000 4.480,000 4.227,000 3.077,000 3.455,000 3.407.000 4.02t,00M0 4.456,000 A639,000 4,584,000 79 0.M Service Reserves eed Fum exlance 9,111.550 5.554.850 5,794.00 6,068,650 8.228.000 6.228,000 6.228,000 0,226.000 6,226,000 6.226.000 45 Capita Reserves,50re e11100.000,000 9,870,050 8.070.000 0,870,000 91870,000 0.870.000 8,870.000 01870.000 9.870.000 9.870,000 9.870,000 46 FmOenmenW Rp Res,Shane of 810,M,OW 987.000 987,00D 987,000 907.000 987.000 907,000 087.000 887,000 887,000 987,000 47 he.-.. Resrves..Cepal 706.000 2.285.000 3.884,000 6.213.000 8.802.850 8.023.050 4,162.050 2.478,250 1.013,450 1219,35M 96 AppopristM patentee 32.027.650 29.375.650 31,309.650 34,047,850 37,495,650 35.665.850 34,835.050 34.152.25D 33,496.450 32,855.650 DISTRICT NO 2 18 Next Year a Dry Period Fuming Rpuiremanb 12.980.000 15.419,000 16,676,000 18.875.000 20,754,000 23.074,000 24.317.04)(1 25.676.00(1 27.181.0W 28,707." 19 Catangenry Reewves.20%of Op.lgml. 3.496.000 3.034.000 4.076.013D 4,094.000 4.748.000 5,195.000 5,687.00D 6,227,000 6,820.000 7.470.000 20 Insurance Ras.rven.Opwating 21,525,000 23.097.OW 25.380.000 25.242,000 23.007,000 19,920,000 18.131.000 18.449,000 20,804,000 23.311,000 79 Oeld Service Reserve.and Fum BYanee 19.352.650 13.105.550 13.805.000 15,156.W0 16.500.000 1e,508,000 IQ508,000 16,50AM 18,506,000 18,500.000 45 Coaxial Reserve,Shane 01100.000.00D 28,750,000 20.750.000 28.750.000 25,750,000 20.750.000 28,750,000 28,750,000 28.750.000 28,750,000 28,750,000 40 Enwrunentax Rep Re.,%we o7 S I D.WO,OW 2,875.0DO 2.875.000 2.875.000 2,875.0x) 2.875.0001 2.975.0001 2.1375,000 2.075.000 2,875.000 2.e75.000 47 lmurance Rnarvw CeptN 33.720.000 42,045.000 52.311.550 54.855.550 62,300.550 50.701.550 50,572.550 61."9.550 64.207,550 68,126.550 96 ApryOpieted Reserves 122.707.650 129.605,650 143,876.550 149.958.550 158,990,550 153.021.550 155,839.550 160,532.550 167.143.550 175.825.550 DSTRICT NO3 10 Next Yaa.Gy Pmpd Fund"Rpubrrw1. 11737,000 16.564.000 17.170,000 18.980.000 21.709,000 24.414.000 25,87S.M 27.066,000 28.586.000 30,211.00D 19 Contipmp Meme.,20%010per Rgmle 3,984,000 4.247,000 4,418.000 4,514,000 4,892,000 5,340.000 5.84e,000 0.398.001) 6,997.000 7.856.000 20 Immance Re.rverf,,trarq 27,90AMO 29,828,000 33.082,000 35.092,000 31.880.000 26,033,000 24.027.0321 21.919.000 20.356,000 19.392,000 79 Deal Samoa Reserves we Finial Samna 20,518,500 12,273.500 13,030.500 15,2050W 17,035,000 17,035,000 17.095,OW 17.035.000 17.035,000 17,035.000 45 Capital Reserve,Shane o181 W,W0.OW 31,1170.000 31,870.000 31,870,000 31,870.000 31.870.00D 31.870,000 31.070,000 31,870.000 31,870,000 31.870,000 40 Environmental Rate Iles,S6ere 0110.000.0410 3.187.000 3.187,000 3,187,000 3.187.000 3.197,0011 3.187.000 3,187,000 3,187,000 3,187.000 3.107,000 47 Inwrance Reesrv.4-CNiIN 18,805,000 25.692.OW 33.544000 36241.500 41,074,SW 31.810.500 28.088.500 24.608,50D 21.189,500 17.880,50D 88 A,,w,w ltl Mwvx 119,987.501) 123,881,5W 137.619.500 145,159,500 M.735.500 140.207.500 135.731.SW 132,WB.500 129.220.500 127,220.500 CF 938 2.%LS 11:12 AM 4127M3 Poo0 2 RESERVES BALANCES ANALYSIS NO Are CNnges Fr 93�94 PROJECTED CASH FLOWS PrOpeM Toes Cenrnt At 92.93 LWW REVWED427-93 FM 19B 43 1993.94 199495 1995.90 1988.9) 1997-99 MW99 19W2000 DISTRICT NO 5 IB Not Yer's Dry PriW Funding Rpuiremente 2.072.000 2.370.000 2.525.000 2.838.000 3,111,000 3.398.000 3.542,000 3,886.000 3.808.000 4,o49.0130 19 Cen6manw Reserves.20%o1 OW R4". 400.000 476,000 510.000 558.000 607.000 659,04DO 710,000 )T,OW 845,000 919,000 M Moumce Resnver Ogren, 9,414,0W 10,490.000 11.510.004) 11,914.000 11.N9,000 11,574,O4H) 11,212.00o 10.OSdOW 9,939.000 0.953.000 79 Not Service Reaervee and Fund BAexs 3.808.000 I,800.000 2,031.000 2,200,000 t381,OW 2,381.OW 2.381,000 2.381.000 2.381,000 2.381,000 45 Genial Reeerree.Sore al$100.000.000 4,440A00 4.440.000 4.440.00D 4.H0.000 4.N0.000 4.440.000 4.440.OW 4."0.O00 4.MO.OW 4,440,000 40 Enrbonondol A,Ree,Some Ot 110.000.000 4 .Ooo 444,OW 444,000 444,000 444.0W 444.0W 4,14,000 4441000 4 .oc0 444.000 47 Insurance Reenrs -Capitl 4.9)B.OW 5.]90.OW ).041.OW 8.680.WD 10.280.OW 9,]OB4OW 9.51).OW ),892.OW 5,091,W0 5,933,OW 80 Appepired Romovet 25,720,000 W.410.000 2B.W7.O0G 31,981,000 33.182AW 3MM.000 31,252,000 30.117.000 28,748,000 27.119,000 PSTWCT NO 0 IB Nest Yesi a Dry Penal Funding Rgwemenla 2.011.000 2.192,MO 2,533,000 3,171,000 3,527,000 SAM.= 4.106.000 4,407.000 4,955.000 4,915.000 19 COntingenc,Reeennos.20%41 Open Root, 507.000 584,000 no.OW 700.000 )S).OW 840.O0D 920,000 1.006.000 1.105,000 1.211,000 20 inunrge Rasvves—Operating 0,062.000 7,n0.OW 8,121,000 7,920,5W 7.023.500 7.304.500 7.150.SW 7,400.500 7.9M,5W 8.725,500 79 0.1 Service Reserves end Fund Mount ;980,600 1,505,600 2.2N.800 2.199.600 2.474.eW 2.400,000 2.40D.OW 2.4(NO.6W 2A00.000 2A00.000 45 C Wtd Reserves,%do.o1 S 100.000,000 6.470,OD0 5,470.000 5,470,000 5.470,000 5,470,000 5.470.000 5,470,000 5,470,000 5,470.W0 5.4M,000 46 FnNrrmMtal Roc;Rums,Stuart of 110,000.000 547.04M 547,000 547.000 547.000 547.000 547.001) 547.000 547.000 547,OOU 547.000 Q honor. Weerver-Cepitel I016.0001 217,000 1,096,000 2.140,000 3,3M.000 1092.4001 12.010.4001 16.001,4001 0.434,4004 19.173.4001 90 AppWWW Reserves 1).02).000 18,105.60) 20530,000 22.I5S.100 23.943.100 19.754,100 0.971,100 10.IA.1W 14.053,100 13,495,100 DISTRICT NO) IB Not,Y..Dry Prod Funding RadwemM. 3.407.000 3.843.000 4.866,0430 5.344,OW O.M.000 6,90e,000 7.124,000 7,401.OW 7.835,W0 8.231.StV 19 Contingent,Resrvee.20%ol Open Rpmta 997.00M) 1.039.000 1.208.O00 1,224,000 1,327.000 1.480,O00 1.SBB.OW 1.701.OW 1,848,000 2.00B.WO 20 Ineuranu Renrve6 Operating 14.O67.000 10,948.O4)(t 17,403.000 18.303.000 17.624.W0 15.825,000 14,849,OW 13,450.000 12.089.000 10.800.000 79 OWt Snrice Remvo end Fund BY-not 1,900,350 3.459.350 4.101.350 5.130.350 4.983.350 4,170,000 4,170.000 4,170,000 4,170,00D 4.170.W0 45 Cepitd Rewv.,SNre 01 SI W,000.OW 7.130,000 7.130,000 7.130.000 7.1W,OW 7.13D. M 7,130.000 7.130.000 7,1W,OW 7.130.000 ),I 30,000 40 Environmental Roo Roe,SNre M$10.O00.000 713,000 713,000 713,O00 7I3,OW 713.000 713.000 713.000 713,OW 713,O00 713,000 47 Insurance 11esnver<ep0d 17.219.000 19.526,000 22.315.00D 25.400.O0D 29.W4,W0 IS.BN,380 24J02.]SO ]9.893,350 33.398,350 23.350.360 85 Apprepnrtl Ron.. 45.493.350 52.761.350 07.M8.350 63.310.350 55.913.3W 62.274.3W 00.314,3W 58,517.350 57.183,350 58.410.3W Cf 9]B t.Rls_11:13 AM 4/27193 Pete 3 KSME9 BALANCES ANALYSIS No For Matrices Far,93.94 PROJECTED CASN FLOWS PralreM Tease Canelatt At 92 93 Lrei REVISED 4-27-83 Flat 1992.93 IM-94 199495 1995.98 1996-97 1997-98 1990.99 199�9� 0m1 2114)0Ol 2MI-02 MSTMT NO II 18 Next Yew's Dry PmiOd Fwdbp Rpuiremwrb 2.874.WD 3,111.OW 3,807.000 4.221.OW 4J17,000 5.337,000 5,584,000 5,884.000 5.177,000 6.504,000 18 Cateapmov ReFwn.20%of Ow Rpmis ))0.WO fasi 970.000 901,000 1,028.000 1,121.000 1.223.000 1.934.OW 1456,000 1,590.000 20 lnwuras famervr--0pwetirrp 10,580,W0 1016%.WO 8.)11.IXM 9.491,WO 9.312.OW 8.648.000 8,))4.000 9,306,000 10.224,000 11,5)).WO 78 Dole Service tnxan end FUM Bei 8.355.WO 2,804,000 3.335,000 3.W2.WO 3A27." 3.427.OW 3,427,000 3.427.OW 3.427.000 3.427.DW 45 Capittl reserves,8twe at l l W.DO0.W0 5,900.WD 5,980.WO 5.980.WO 5,981).000 5.980.WO 5.880.000 51980.WO 5.980,000 5,980,000 5,980,000 46 FnmanmentN Rea two.Sous of l l O,OW.OW 598.WD 598,000 598.OW 590.W0 590,W0 598.000 598.0W 598,OW 598.000 598.000 47 Inrrance Rnuvee CpiW 5,718,WD 7,284,D00 9.207.OW 10,357.11W 12.402.000 11.221,000 11.190,00C, 11,211,W0 11,302,OW 11,473.W0 96 A,,,, W Wurvea 34,686,000 31,258,000 33,016.000 34,630,000 37,464,OOD 36,332,OW 36.))6.000 3).)20.OW 39.164,000 41,149.WD MSTRICT NO 13 18 Next Ysari Dr,P.rW FuMiry Rquiremmb 318.000 329.00(1 356,WO 388,OW 418,OW 453,WO 492,000 534,OW 579,000 629.000 19 Coxurpmw fNmvee.20%of Oper Ramis 127.OW 131,600 142AW 154.2W 167.4W 181.200 196.6W 213.4W 231.6W 251.80(1 20 Mewence fleservas-Opariwo 682,W0 28O.4W 96D.OW 920,BW 989,W0 1.043.8W 1,012,400 972,611r) 949AW 929AW 79 Debt Service Rrwv..eM Frmd Belurce 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 C Jxl Reserves SM1ms at 31 W,W0,OW 650.WD 65O,W0 650.0W BW.OW 650,OW 65D.000 65D.WD 6W,OW 650.00C) 650,fm 46 Envirmurtntel Ras tax.Some W 91 O.OW,OW 05.WD 65.00C, 65.W0 65.W0 65,00C, 65.000 65.OW BROW 651W0 65.000 47 hawsers RawrvepCasoal 7,843.WO 0.782,OW 5,777,W0 4,631,W0 3,704,OW 3,413,WD 3,425.W0 3,858,OW 4,782,OW 6.321,000 96 Appepdeted Re.ervaa 91085.W0 8.724,OW 7.851.000 0,015,WD 6.073.W0 5,800.0m 5.841.OW 8.298.00) ).25).OW 8.846.W0 DISTRICT NO 14 18 Naat Year.Dry Pawed Fundirp RK--nls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 COn5a9rq Rwaervas,20%0 Opw"a 256.OW 261,WO 202.000 30,000 330.OW 357.WD 386.WD 418.OW 453.000 492.000 20 1.....e Reaervewopwmirp 414,01W 591,440 650.WO 611,W0 432.WO 304I,WD 333.WO 356,000 379,000 4p4,000 79 Debt S.....Ra.mv.a mk FurW BNance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 Cepitel Reserves,SNre of 4lW.OW,WD 5.040.OW 5.840.OW BB40.OW 5.840.00 5,940,OW 5.84(%= 5.1140.0W 5.040,4W 5.840.00(1 5.840,000 4e Environmental Rp am.Some of 110. 0 .(S)0 584,0W W4.OW 584.00r) 584,000 5114.00C) 584,000 5B4,WO 584,000 684.000 584.000 47 Interco Raawves-Capted 3W,OW 352,OW 659.0010 699,OW 809.WO 815,DW 902.WO 992.o 985.000 I,065.000 90 Apprristr Rr-as 7.454,aW 1.028.OW 8.023.W0 8,039,OW 7,995.11C0 719041 ems.W0 0.080,W0 8.241,000 8.405,000 CF B3B 2.XL4 11:12 AM 4/27/93 Page 4 PESEPVE9 BALANCES ANALYSIS No Pab C apn For 93-94 PROJECTED C 511 FLOLVS Neparry Texas CmNmt At 93 93 Lwtl REVISED 4�2)-93 net 109 -03 1993-94 1994- 1995.90 1888.87 1997-98 199999 19992WO 300601 2WI.02 ALL NSTMCT SUMMARY 18 Nest Year Dry Feriae Poedin9 Pwieir—re. 41,])5,000 46.077,000 53,215,000 59,563.000 67,130.000 M,081,m 78.803,000 82,981,000 117.619.004) 83,5391000 19 Centin0sery Weaves.2M of Op.,PyMe 11,095.000 12.252.600 I3A94.400 14,110.2W 16,271,000 16J21.200 18,229,000 19.921.400 21.7U.6W 33.813,600 20 9nma,w PewrvewOPtrMlp 90.703,000 ID4182.400 II1,640,608 113,1)),300 106.559.600 94,853= 00,517,000 88,007,100 87.399.900 88.603,900 79 ONo 6ervica Wwreat sel Fund St.. 86.193,650 40.880.850 44,923.100 40,053.800 62.002.950 50,145,000 52.145,000 53.146.000 53,145.000 52.145,000 45 Copilot Rwwvw.S5we 0$100,900.00D 100.000.900 100.000.000 100,000,000 t00.000.00D 100,000.000 100,000,000 100,000,000 100,000.000 IOO.00D.000 IM.MI000 40 FmirmrmnrN Pp Fe,More at 410.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10,000.W0 10,000,000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.0001OOD 47 lnmtnw Pwnwa.COIN 88,830.000 111.235.000 135,934.550 150.108.050 171.800.700 144,348,060 138,810.050 130,O111,250 126,274.450 124.155,550 90 Apprwdeled Petnvee 414,786.650 427.535.050 409.129,650 486.097.150 523.700,150 493,159.350 480.504,550 483.672.760 465.118,050 491,337,150 414,786,650 437,535.650 489,129.650 496.087.150 523.M,150 493,159.350 486,504,550 483.0)3]50 485,118,950 491.3]),I60 CF-93B 2.%l3 1102 AM - A 4/27193 P909 5 RESERVES BAIANCES ANALYSIS N.R.1.Qa.9..Par 0Y04 PROJECTED CASH MCNYS ft F Tax C vrl At 92-931 W RE41BW 47.93 R°I 1992-93 199394 1994.95 1995-90 1998.97 199798 1998.99 199� 2004),01 2MI42 PROJECTED SNGLE FAMILY USE FEES 22 1 83.24 83.24 95.00 1ISM 14000 160.00 170.00 178.00 190.00 189.00 22 2 71.52 71.52 70.00 83.00 Saco IOD.00 11000 120.00 1}0.00 M0.00 22 3 73.89 73.89 75W 80.00 8500 95.00 105w 118.00 1M.OD 138.00 22 5 90.)5 9BJ5 100.00 102.50 105.00 110.00 11500 120.00 125.00 1".00 22 8 )a4) )54) 85.00 95.00 105.00 115.00 130.00 146.0 ISOM 118A0 22 T 5D.09 So.09 50.09 52.50 55.00 57.50 80.00 82.00 87.SO 73.80 22 11 Baca 80.00 75.00 95.00 115.00 130.OD 145.00 IBOAO 175.00 ISOM 22 13 100.00 100.00 102.50 105.00 107.50 110.00 102.50 105.00 107.50 110.00 22 We,gMeE Ave )1.28 )1.29 78.18 83.19 90.6) 101.35 110.60 119.80 128.90 13837 MASTER PLAN SINGLE FAMILY USE FEES 22.2 1 100.00 100.00 MOD I25.00 MOD MCI) 175.00 1M.00 MIND 225.00 22.2 2 60.00 7500 75.OD 100.00 100.00 1M." 125.00 1M OD 150.00 180.00 22.2 3 100m 100 00 100.01) 1 MOD 1 MIND I M.00 1M.00 I M.00 200.00 200.00 22.2 5 100.00 100.00 125.00 1 M.M 1 M.00 126.0 1S0.00 I00.00 100.00 I MCI) 22.2 B 75.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 ISOM 1M.00 125.00 ISOM 175.00 1TIM 22.2 ) saw 50.00 50.00 )S.DD MOD M.00 75.00 105.00 125.00 125.00 22.2 11 150.00 175.00 I75.00 175.00 MOD 1115.00 1715.00 MOD 178.00 200.00 }}.2 13 90.00 95.00 9580 100.00 106.00 110.00 IIO.OD 115.00 12O.OD 130.00 W.19.1.0 AV. 82.97 9040 01.22 112.58 112.54 12185 14350 150.54 17002 174.49 M Faa 0 92.93 Tax..a.SaW M F.4 22.1 1 108.29 I20.00 139.93 184.03 1M.22 194.07 199.41 204.23 209.03 22.1 2 105.40 111.70 116.81 121.42 MI$ 142.00 152.59 M 31 172.03 22.1 3 111.01 112.04 116.93 121.80 131M 141.51 15"os 161.22 121.08 22.1 5 185.55 IN." 190.0 122.93 197.42 20I.A 208.47 21 I.D3 215.50 22.1 8 110.12 11880 IM." IM.42 148.34 103.25 178.18 193.12 20003 22.1 2 61.23 01.21 as." 88.02 98A5 90.90 93.24 98.09 102.92 22.1 11 IMAD 115.02 134.81 IMA4 169.26 183.99 198.)1 213.45 22017 22.1 13 100.00 102g} 104.R 1W.49 109.85 103.06 104.90 107.55 IWA6 22.1 W*SiSai A. 108.95 111.23 118.03 125.95 136.43 145.58 154.35 153.42 17246 CF 920IIA 11:12AM 4/27193 Papa 8 RESEWES BAIANOES ANALYSIS No Pete Qo19u Far 9194 F110JECTEO CASH FLVW6 Nw.PW Taxes Ceneunt At 92-93 LwH BENSEB 4.27 93 Bet 1992=93 1993.94 19".96 1995.96 1990.97 1997.98 1998.99 198� 20 01 3W1 03 CASH FLOW MWECTEO EWA 23 1 73.990 74,W0 74.2W 74,410 74.700 n.080 75,WO 75.490 75,990 76,580 23 2 270.733 271.483 272,483 273.733 275,233 277,233 277.233 270.733 282,233 284,733 23 3 282.909 203.380 283.988 284,788 285,789 286,030 280.936 288.WB 209,238 290.389 23 5 20.904 29.954 27,029 27.129 27.254 27,404 27.4154 27,554 27,704 27.854 23 9 43,272 43.372 43.472 43,572 43.972 43.772 43,772 43.972 43,072 44,072 23 7 104,511 104,581 114,60, 104,811 105,011 105,201 105,201 1051581 10,961 106.461 23 11 51.003 51.233 51.433 51.733 52,W3 $2,433 52.433 52.808 53.103 53,558 23 13 8,740 6.940 7,140 7.440 7.740 8,140 9,140 8,840 9,240 8,940 23 Te1N 880,221 851,991 864,406 867,616 071.481 870.241 876,241 881.746 $07,521 093,580 CF 939 2.%lS 11:13 AM 4127/93 Page 7 RESERVES BALANCES ANALYSIS No Rate Ch"es Fm 83.94 PROJECTED CASH ROWS RpporN Tens Constant Al 92.93 LeW REA9 4,27.9a Rel 1992.93 1993m94 1994-N 1005 88 1990.17 1998&99 1909m2000 200001 2001-02 TOTAL USE FEE PROJECTIONS USING MASTER PLAN RATES AND CASH FLOW EOW 1 7,399,000 7.40Sm000 7.420.000 9.301.250 9.337.500 9.382.800 13,135.500 13.210.700 IB.IB8.000 17.226A00 2 10.243.900 2%361,225 20,436,225 27,373.300 27.523.30E 34,a04,125 34,654.12E 34,986.020 42.334.950 42.700.950 3 20,298.800 20,338.000 20,308,00E 35.598,500 35.723.60E 35.967.250 80.214.150 50,415.40E 67.647.a00 68,077,000 5 1800,40E 2695.400 3,370.525 3.381.125 3,408,750 3.425.S00 4,110.600 4,133,10E 4,15S,a00 4,874.450 6 3.245.400 4,337.200 4,3Q,200 4,367,200 4,367,200 5.471,500 5.471.500 61580.e00 7,095,100 7.712.600 7 5.225.550 5.228.050 5.233.060 71980,825 7,075.825 7.894.575 7,094.575 13,195.125 13.248,129 13.307.625 11 7.602,450 8,905,776 9,00077E 9.053.275 9.114,525 9.175.775 9.175.775 9,241.40E 9.307.025 10.711.600 13 605.600 659.300 678,300 744,000 312.700 895,400 896,40E 983,000 1,100,800 1,292,20E Tetel 71372180 77991.750 78,893975 97.679,475 90,161,300 108]ee,625 125,551,625 132.730.800 150,892,200 156,012.025 TOTAL USE FEE PROJECTIONS UMNO CAW FLOW RATES AND U9N FLOW EWa 24 1 a.158,928 6.164,754 7.049.000 8.557.150 10A68A00 1zma.000 12.700.200 13.210.750 13.670.200 14.163.600 24 2 19.362.024 19,410,404 21.253,674 22,719.830 24.220.504 27.723,300 30,495.830 33,587,860 30,a9O.2SO 39,802.820 24 3 20,909.993 20.939,839 21.209.10E 22.763,030 24.291.960 27.259.110 30.128.400 33,130,120 30.154.750 39.202.380 24 5 2.002,952 2.407,800 2.702.900 2.780.723 2,861.670 3,014,440 3.151.400 3.30 .400 3,463.000 3.621,020 24 a 3.309,010 3,316,057 3,095.120 4.138,340 4,586,560 51033J80 5.090.360 0.301,440 7.035.020 7J12,600 24 7 5.234,95E 6.237.400 9.242,460 6.502,570 5,775,805 6.062.509 a,318,000 6,597,503 7,152,366 7.710.423 24 11 3.054,980 3.073,960 3.857,475 4.914.635 8.988.545 6.81a.290 7.602,765 9.449.290 9.307.028 10.170.020 24 13 074.000 694.00E 731,060 781,20E 832,050 896.400 834.350 007,200 993.300 1,093,400 24 Total 01.317,843 61.450.655 05,831.588 72,170.504 79,014,914 88.604,428 96.970.935 105,530.793 114,474,453 123.560.003 TOTAL USE FEE PROJECTIONS USING RATES IF 92.93 TAXES RAISED BY FEES AND CASH FLOW EOU, 1 8.020.00E 0,90400E 10.412,000 12,313.00E 13.880,00E 14,004,335 15.053.29E 15.619.580 10.003.222 2 20.815,00E 30,453,000 31,919.000 33,420,00E 30.922,00E 39,012,784 12.605,516 45.808.234 48.981,031 3 31,458,OOO 31,817,000 33,301,000 34,B10,00E 37.777,000 40.804.265 43.00 ,932 46,031,594 40.a79,259 5 5.004.00E 5,088,00E 5.177,00E 51256.000 5.410,000 5.534.705 5.989,030 5,840.340 a.004,864 6 4,778.00E 5,154,000 5.696,00E 8,040,OOD a,493,000 7.145,575 7.817,482 6,491.896 8.100.197 7 8,494.000 8.499.00D 8,780.00E 9.033.000 9.310.O0 9.563.743 9.842.703 10.393.954 10.957.245 11 5,133,00E 5,918.000 6.974.00E 8.049.000 6.675.000 9.547.005 10.483.404 11.351.950 12.220,43E 13 694 000 732.00E 701.00E 832,000 925.000 034,727 907,013 993,718 1,093.0.ID Tatty 92.194.000 86.574.000 102.922.00E 109.700,OOO I19.547.00D 127.647.239 130.094.155 145.037.078 154,107.905 CF 93B 2.XL5 11:12 AM 4/27193 Page B RESERVES BALANCES ANALYSIS No Bete Cbegee For 93.94 PROJECTED f SH f 0iA S Pmp.rt,Time.Conetml At 92 93 Lwd REVISED 4 27 93 Ref 1992,93 1993*94 91 94.95 199596 1996W47 1997%98 1986-99 199920N 2N0.01 2W1-02 DEBT SEIMCE RATIOS Minn.1 97 Seem Den Cevmo90.Mn 1.25 276 1.69 2.03 2.28 2.47 2.48 2.56 2.57 2.58 2.58 98 9ubmdinm.lim Cvverpe.Mn 1.00 1.87 1.19 1.20 1.39 1.47 1 AA 1.49 1.50 1.50 1.50 99 AiAlmon a Bo e.Tee119r 6 Sub 1.Mn 1.25 1.93 1.32 1.43 1.43 1.52 1.55 1.59 L59 1.69 1.00 Mebim 2 97 Swor Um Ceverpe.Mn 1.25 4.92 3.0 3.40 3.22 3.10 3.06 3.19 3.35 3.52 3.70 9B Submdirule Dn Cevmpe,M i 1.00 3.22 2.03 2.09 1.91 1.80 1.74 1.91 1.91 2.00 2.10 99 Additioml Bondh,Tine I S B Sub I.Min 1.25 2.95 2.16 2.12 1.85 1.73 1.75 1.87 1'95 2.04 2.14 Mvu ct 3 97 Swim Lien Coverpe.M..1.25 5.47 3.39 3.74 3.44 2.97 2.62 2.60 2.76 2.83 2.90 98 Subwdinere Den Cevope,Mt 1.00 3.22 2.00 2.02 1.82 1.55 1.36 1.39 1.43 IAT 1.50 99 AdditbnN Bend.T..,1 Sr 8 Sub I.Mn 1.25 2.58 2.07 1.97 1.70 1.55 1.46 1.49 1.52 1.56 1.60 Mon.,5 97 Swim Uen COvm.9e.Mn 1.25 5.00 3.00 3.()4 2.81 2.66 2.39 2.31 2.22 2.11 1.98 BB SuberdineU Gen C msev.Mn 1.00 3.16 2.01 1.94 1.73 1.61 1.42 1.37 1.32 1.25 1.18 99 Additional BoMRwI(Sr B SW 1.Min 1.25 2.02 2.43 1.95 1.69 1.59 1.50 1.45 1.41 1.35 1.29 Dono,6 BJ St ior Gen Coverge.Mn 1.25 8.50 10.12 6.97 4.17 3.81 3.08 3.17 3.29 3.42 3.64 98 Submdimim Wn Cevnp.,Mm 1.00 3.22 2.54 2.13 1.55 1.47 1.24 1.27 1.32 1.37 1.46 99 Additional BaMe Tee,l Sr 6 Sub 1.Min 1.25 2.64 2.60 2.19 1,55 1.50 1.37 1.41 1.44 1.49 1.55 M.rim T 87 St.lien Coverpe,Mon 1.25 9.69 7.33 5.08 4.28 3.57 3.05 3.13 3.19 3.35 3.53 9B Submdonete Lien Coverpe.Mn 1.00 4.67 3.32 2.30 1.98 1.68 IAA 1.48 1.51 1.58 1.66 99 Addilimml Bond.Tnt 1 Sr B Sub 1,Mon 1.25 5.29 3.42 2A3 1.76 1.64 1.53 1.48 1.52 1.58 1.66 DiOnot 11 87 Sow.Gen Coverge,Mn 1.25 11.15 8.70 6.23 5.30 4.71 4.02 4.26 4.52 4.00 5.08 98 Submdinete Den Coverp.,Mn 1.00 3.06 1.97 1.08 1]I 1.67 lAl 1.59 1.69 1.79 1.90 99 Additi-I SoMe Le,I Sr B Sub I.Mn 1.26 2.74 1.97 1.89 1.58 1.64 1.57 1.66 1.75 1.04 1.95 Cf 938_2XL5_I 1:12 AM u 4127/93 Pogo 9 RESERVES BAIANCES ANALYSIS NO R.I.Ch.,..Fee 93.94 FHOJECTED CASH FLOWS PraaaM Taxes Ceo.lml A191A3 Level MVISED 4 27 93 B'I 1992-93 1993.94 1994.99 1995.96 1990.97 107,90 1999s9 j888.mo MOMDI 2001 02 DI.".l 13 97 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DOD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90 DEBT SERVICE FATIOS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.Oo 0.00 0.00 O.DD 0.00 DOC 99 Seaim Um C...'. NDIVIO1 Normal IDIV/01 IDIVl01 mviol ND W01 INVIDI IDIVI01 IDIVI01 IDIVIOI mill 97 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 DEBT SERVICE RATIOS O.D0 OAO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.DO 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Sera lien Cevwp. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CF 930 9.%L6 11:12 AM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT W.1 Renard 4127193 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Retina A9exy Row..Ien. FISCAL YEARS 1962-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 Prep To..COmtent At 92 93 Level No Fee Change 93-94 BerrpwlnB In 96�97 NO COP In 20%Conrin9errcy 1992.1997 1967-2002 LINE 188283 188384 1984-98 188B 9B 1B95-97 B.Y.,Total B.Yesr Total 10-Yell Total LINE 1 OPERATING FUND I 2 Roeawe A Cory-0var Fran Leer year 8125.000 11.273.000 10.999,OW 10.679 000 10 WB 000 9.125.000 11 WO WO 9126 OW 2 J REVENUE a 4 Shen of l%Tea Alb-lien 1.85610D0 1.085.OW I.855,000 1.855,000 1,955,000 9.276.000 9,275.000 1111.1150.000 4 5 Foes:lnMnRlel Waste 400.O00 460.000 629,00D EOB.000 699,Wo 2.090,000 6,425,000 11.121.0011, B B Uesr Few 6,159,000 6.iII 7.048.000 9.557.000 10.468.WD 39,399,000 00.204.000 104,992,000 B Interest a Miewlleteern Inerae I.158,000 763,000 740.000 762,000 708.000 4,204.000 4,966.OW 9.090.000 ) 8 Treater farm COP Fund, 920,000 440,000 340.000 356.00"0 369.000 2,1281000 1,670.WO 3,096.000 8 9 gate Rxrnw 307,000 0 0 0 0 307,000 0 307,000 8 10 TOTAL REVENUE 10409.000 9,668,00D 10.519,000 12.120000 14.188 W0 68996.000 87500.000 144658000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 19,624,000 2098800D 21.211100D 22.802.000 26.075000 66120,000 69.260O00 153J8D.W0 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Stares of Jelnl Woke M A 0 4.572.000 4,718.000 6,1e1.000 5,710,O01) 6,281.000 26,473.O011 42,181.000 611.451 13 14 Collection SWarm M A O and Other Oper. 650,000 650.000 583.000 )1).00O 763,000 3.463,000 4.375,000 7,028.000 14 15 COP Sorolw 3 12B 000 4.888.000 4 B)0.000 b 469 WO 6 441 000 24 694 W D 38]11 000 81,305,000 16 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,351.000 10.257,000 10.644,000 11,e93O041, 13478000 64.520000 e8267O00 1377117000 19 17 Reswes A Carry-Owr to Neat year 11,273,O00 10.699.000 10,074.O430 10.809,000 11,000,000 11,600,000 19,993,OW 15,993,OW 17 18 Hart Yuis Dry Period Ponding ReeullemeMe 4,176.000 5,129,000 5.272,000 5,947.000 6.738.000 6.738,000 8,213.000 9,213.000 18 19 20%Cenlin9ewy We anal COP..,I.N 1,044.000 1,074000 108000 1,265.000 1A0).000 1.40],000 3.216.OW 22100W IB 20 Portion of lneurenw Aid.6urplue rr lDe114111 B.OSJ.000 4.498000 422]000 3.B]].000 3455,000 34650W 4664000 4b640W W 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 &1 Ford,Residene6 Wet Fee $03.24 $83.24 $95,00 $115.00 $140.00 I105.00 22 22.1 SIR Fee If 92.93 bees Federal By Fee 0108.29 6120,00 $139.93 $104.03 $209.03 22.1 22.2 SFR Fee From 20W Vilon Mesterplen 1100.00 0100.00 1100.00 $125.00 4125.00 $225.00 22.2 23 Player,of E4ul—khrt Dwe111n9 Unlre 73,990 74,060 74.200 74,410 ]4,]00 ]).200 23 24 Eellmeled War Fax 46,159,000 /8.185,000 17.049,WO $8,557,000 $10,458,000 $14,282,000 24 F..NAXU4.n=l- Wee1-Pnea COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 R—i-d 4127M STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW P.B.2 FISCAL YEARS 1 BB2.19B3 THROUGH MI-2002 1992 1997 1997-2002 LINE 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995416 1990-97 5-Yean Totel 5-Veer Telel 10Nwn Toth LINE 25 CAPITAL FUNDISI 26 26 Nemec B Con,<var Fran Lam Y., 10,440,000 11.5,13.000 13.122,000 14,841 000 17.070.000 10.440,000 19.659,650 10,440,000 26 27 REVENUE 27 20 CensSuotlen Glen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 28 few: Connocton 105.000 329.000 51910" 761p00 978.000 2.743,000 B.OBO= 11.823.000 28 30 Indu.IIW WaetB 125.000 131.000 138,000 145.000 1511DOo 691.000 111 1.574.000 30 31 User Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 32 Swo of Capadty Fights I30,000 141.000 71,000 202.000 280.000 824.000 221,000 1,045.000 32 33 Ann aaeRon Feee 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 33 34 Intenet A MHoallemew In.One 783.000 878,000 991.000 1.131.000 1,302.000 5.085.000 5.122.000 10.207,0D0 34 35 Traneler Pro—d.lion COP Fund 6.019,000 ).36).000 8.310,000 10,176,ODD 9,342,850 43,204,654 0 43,204,650 35 36 Oth.,Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 37 TOTAL REVENUE 8,222.000 8836000 10.029.000 12.4050DD 12056650 52647,050 15,308000 57963,650 37 38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 18062.000 20.479,000 23,151.000 27,248,000 29125050 02.987.650 34865650 70293650 38 39 E%PENDTTURES 39 40 SMn 41 Joint W.A.Treeonont Plent 5.9581000 6.954,000 8.186.000 9,921000 8.861.000 39.669.000 18.108.000 50.039.000 40 41 M.1no,CD11e6en BYetem 1.0001000 403,004 126,000 255,000 615.000 21386.000 6.158.000 0,557.000 41 42 Otiv1 1.001,00D 0 0 0 0 1.061.001) 0 1.001.000 42 43 TOTAL E%PENMTURES 8,019.000 ),35).000 8,310.000 10.176.000 9468000 43328000 24328000 57658000 43 44 Cepitel S EnAvonnental Rep Room— 11,633,000 13.122,000 14,841.000 17.070.000 19.659.650 19.859.050 10,837.060 10.637.650 44 45 Shire of 100.000.000 Capitol Rftrve 9.870,000 9.8701000 9.870,000 9.070.000 9,070,000 9,970,000 8.070,000 9,8]O,000 45 40 SMre of a10,000.000 Eron on Room— 86),000 90]000 9B).DDD 98],000 BB) 0 OO 9B). D BB),000 907.000 46 47 Portion of to unnco Rxene 786 000 2 295 000 3 984 000 0213000 a 802 SS,000 8 802 650 219 E. 219 360 47 48 61n9Ie Femlly Reticle.Con tionFee 02,350 $2.350 $2,470 $2,590 02.720 03,480 48 49 Nunler of New EWIvMent Dwellln9 U.I. ]O 140 210 290 360 700 49 50 Eetineted Connection Foo lno9ne 1165.000 0329.000 0519.000 $751,000 0878,000 02.435.000 50 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.1 R.vived 4137I93 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pao.3 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001.2002 1992-1997 1997-2002 UNE 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-98 1996-87 5-Yoor Total 5.Yoor Tool 1PYoor Total LINE 61 BOND FUNd31 51 52 Rwrvw B CNW-Uwr Fmm Loot Ywr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 53 REVENUE 63 54 Too Levy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 55 Inbrwt&Mi.oalwwwwo 1.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 56 dBoo I.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 67 TOTAL REVENUE 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 57 58 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 O O O 0 0 O 58 68 EXPENDITURES 59 80 Bang,Portman,a Inmea, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 BI Trenete,to Capital Fedlillw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 61 82 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02 e3 Rwervw&Cpny-Over to Naot Ywr 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 63 84 11a.1 Ye m a On,Period Fundln0 Rwulramwle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 05 Frr.d Saw—er ID.0ei0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 as 65 COP FUNDS ee 67 flow—&C.,,—,From Leal Year 5,040.000 9.111.050 5,554,650 5.794,650 810681650 5,040000 9.228.000 5.040,000 67 &B REVENUE 99 B9 New Borrowing 12,]2],000 4,000,000 9.ODG000 I l'oW.000 10,000,000 46,727,000 0 40.727.000 69 70 Inlarwt&Oth.r, 820,000 440.002 J40,000 358,002 389,"1 2,125,000 1,970,000 8995.000 70 71 Total Raranue 1934).000 4,440.000 9.340,000 11.358,000 to, o 389.000 40,832.000 1e)0.000 50.722.000 71 72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 18.397,000 13.661.050 14894.650 17,150,650 18.437,050 53892,000 8.096.000 $6.782.000 72 73 EXPENDITURES 73 74 Pat!.Coal Dawn.to Capitol Faollitiw Fund 8.019,000 ),35).000 0.310.000 10.176,000 9,342.650 43,204A50 0 43,204.650 74 75 Interest Earned Twundw.to Opwanin9 Fwd 620,000 440,000 340.000 356,000 369,000 2.125.000 1.870,000 3,995.000 75 78 Color.11.... 636.350 200,000 460,000 550,000 500,000 2.338,350 0 2.338.360 76 ]) DIM, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ]] 78 Total Expw8lurae 0.275 360 7,887.000 8.100.000 11,082 000 10,211,650 47.566.000 1.8)0.000 49.536.000 78 79 Narrow.&Corry.—m Nwil Year 911111860 6.664.00 5,704,650 8.0891650 8,228,000 6,226.000 6.226,000 6.226.000 79 80 ReaWred Dahl Bonn.R.... 4.526.000 4728.000 5.178.000 5,720,000 8.220.000 6.226.000 6.226.000 6,226,000 80 81 Fund Bal.no. 4 BBfi 880 B20 B50 818 B50 342.650 0 0 0 0 111 of Ml ma.. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 1 Revi,eE 4127193 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW P.,4 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 1992-1997 1997 2002 LINE 1992-93 1993-94 1994.95 199546 1998-97 5 Year Total 5-Y9er Total 10-Year Tolel LINE 82 SUMMARY 82 93 Roxorvns&Carry Me,Frem Leal Yee, 24,005,000 32.027,050 29,375.650 31.309,850 34,047,850 24,005,OOo 37.405,550 24.005,000 83 84 Total Revenue 33,069,000 22959000 298111000 358419000 39,590.650 150.394,850 104838000 2832301150 84 85 Total Available Funding 57.673.000 54,986.650 $9.203,050 07.198.550 70,638.300 162.999,650 142.321.050 207.035,050 85 06 Tend Expenlllu,x 25.845.350 25.611.000 27.954.000 33.151.000 33 152,650 145,514 000 10B 466.000 254.979 000 Be 87 Reserves&Car,Over to Next Your 32,027.850 29 376.050 31.309.650 34.047.650 37,485,650 37.485,650 32 856.650 32,858 650 87 RESERVES ANALYSIS 88 Next Yaeie On,Period Funding Refulrentand. 4,1141,000 5,129,000 5,272,000 5,947.000 6.738,000 8.738.000 2163,0000 9.230" 88 1.40].00 00 .00Be Cwtnwney flerorv .20%of Op.,Reeml 1.041,000 1.074,000 1,1)6.000 1,28fi,000 tp0],000 . 89 90 Debt Service Haeerves and Fund Belanw 9.111.650 5.554,850 5.794.650 61060.660 0.22a.000 8,226.000 6,225.000 6.226,000 90 91 Copled Nxarvx.Slam of a100,000.000 9.870.000 9,870,000 9.870.000 9187IL000 9,870,000 9,070,000 9,8>0,000 9.870,000 B1 92 EnvironmenMl Rae Rm.Sinew of 410,000,000 967.000 987.000 987.000 907.000 987.000 987.000 98).000 987.000 92 93 Inwrenw Remax. e,039.000 0,761.000 8,211,000 9,890,000 12 257,850 12,257.060 4.344,850 4,344 850 93 94 Total Appropriated Rxervx 32.027.850 29,375.e50 31.309,650 34,047,850 37,485.650 37.406,1150 32,050,650 32,858,850 94 95 Un.ppmp,laled Re.ervx 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 95 96 Total Rxarve. 32,02].650 28,37S 650 31309650 34047650 37,485.B50 37485p50 32.655,650 1 32858650 90 DEBT SERVICE RATIOS 97 SwJor Lion Coverage.Min 1.25 2.76 159 2.03 2.28 2.47 2.58 97 98 Suber®nets Lien Cover...Min 1.00 1.87 1.19 1.29 1.39 1.47 1.50 9B 99 Additional Senate Tee'I S,&Sub 1.Min 1.25 1.93 1.32 1.43 1.43 1.52 1.60 99 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 Raviad 4127M80 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW fretin9 Afenvy Differentia- FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROOOH 2O01-2D02 prop Talmo Cemdnt At 92-93 Laved No Fes Chengere For 93.94 No COP In 20%Contin9ercy Eatimeted 5-Yeer Total 5-Y..,TOIN LINE 1992.93 1993.94 1994-05 199696 199697 1992-1997 1997Q002 10-Yeer Total LINE I OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reserves 5 terry-Over Frem Lest Year 28.808,000 38.001.000 42.150.000 46.134.000 48.311.000 26 0011000 40.507.000 20.809,000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Share of l%Tax Allocation 9,199,000 911991000 9.199.000 9.198.000 91199,000 45.995.000 45.996,000 91,990,000 4 5 Fa-:1ndu.rrie1 Was. 2.250,000 2.588,000 2.971L000 3,422.000 3.935.000 15.171.000 30,512.000 45.683.000 5 6 Use,F... 19.303,000 19.418.000 21.254.000 22,720.000 24.221,000 106.974,000 169,590,000 279,5a4,000 0 ] Inters..O M...Iran..-income 4,213,000 2,807,000 3.101.000 3,317,000 3.390,000 16.830,000 10.082.000 34.918,WO ] B Threats,/ram COP Fund. 921,000 870.000 610.000 BB0.000 950.000 4.426,000 4,850,000 9,376,000 of 9 Or.,Revenue 1307,000 0 0 0 0 1,307,000 0 1.307.000 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 37,153.000 3419881000 37.340,000 39.527.000 41.703.000 IM.M9.000 289129.000 459.636,000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 03.951.000 72.987,000 79,490.000 05.661.000 90.014,000 217517.000 317.636.000 486,040.000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Share of blot Woke M e 0 15.381.000 15.974.000 17.401.000 19,M>,000 21.126.000 89.051.000 141,8110.000 230,940,000 13 14 Castration Syerem M 6 O and OINar 0esr. 2.099.000 2.295.000 2,919.000 2.765.000 2.803,000 12,981,000 151105.000 27,786,000 14 15 COP SoMet 84110.000 13889000 12970000 15378.000 1)J)9DOD W.2)8000 101 OJ40DD 168352000 15 16 TOTAL EXPMOTUMS 25.950.000 30.837000 33.366.000 37360000 41.607.000 169010000 258088000 427,078,000 16 17 R-arvas a Corry-Guar to Near Yaer 39.001.000 42.150.000 48.134.000 49,311,000 49,607.000 48.507A00 59.568.000 59.658.000 17 18 Wet Yens Dry peeled Funding W4Wmr-nu 12.90.000 16.419.000 16,678.000 18,675.000 M.nei.000 20.754,000 28,707.000 28.787.000 is 19 20%ContlnpurfY R»(.1 COP urfulfe) 3 W 000 3,034,000 4,076,000 4,394,000 4 J4B 000 4.J46.000 J 4)0000 ]4]0 D00 19 10 laenlen el I-urance Nee,Surplus or Gotkitl 1 000 23 OW Ooo 26 3110000 28 242 000 23 00>Oo0 2300]000 23 311.000 23.it I,WO 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Hindle Pemily Roidfne.War Fee 071.52 071.52 078.00 I93.00 088.00 1140.0D 22 22.1 SFR Fort If 02.93 Term Are Raised by Foe 11105.40 0111.76 $1111.61 4121.42 0172.03 22.1 22.2 Not Fare From M20 Vision Meeterpintn 100.00 O75.00 O76.00 $roo 0 0100.00 1150.00 22.2 23 Nianbar,of Eoul-lase Dwelling UNte 270.793 271,403 272.483 273.733 275.233 287.233 23 24 b9meted User Fen 918,363,000 $19.410.000 #21.254.000 122.7M.000 $24,221,000 140,212,6M 24 Ci}we.M1E�.N]Ip�MO M vqe] COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 Review!4127193 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 2 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002 5-Year Total S.Ywr Total LINE 1992.93 1993.84 1994-85 1995-90 188E-8T 19924887 1997$002 10-Year Tmel LINE 25 CAPITAL FUNDI51 25 26 Rwerwe&Carry-over From Last Year 57.204.000 65,354.000 74.270.000 83.936.550 86,491.550 57,704.000 93.985.550 57.704AOO 26 27 REVENUE 27 28 C......der,Grants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 29 Feee: Conversion 1.7113,000 2.350,000 3,088,000 3,885,000 5,4tO.000 16.526.000 39,500,000 55,026,000 29 30 Induselal Wen,. 1.1501000 1,208.000 1.268, 0 1,331.000 11398,00. 6,355.000 8.110,000 14,4M.000 30 31 We,Fee. O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 32 Sale of Capacity Many 325.000 409.000 205,000 586,000 911.000 2.386.000 040.000 3,026.000 32 33 Annaeelion Few 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 33 34 Interest&Mi...Iran...lncrme 4,302.000 4,949,000 5,008.000 6.041.000 0,397.000 27.357.000 32.007,000 60.244,000 34 36 Transfer Proceeds from COP Fund 20,273.000 22,317,000 25,029.550 24,300,000 24.300.MO 1la,219,550 0 118,219.550 35 36 Other Rwanve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 37 TOTAL REVENUE 27.923.000 31233 36190.550 341 38"iI 1611849550 01.137.000 249.900.550 37 38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 85.627.000 98.587,000 109.488.550 120.079.550 124.837.560 228647.550 175,122.550 302,B84,550 b 39 EXPENDITURES 39 40 6Bue at foim Wehe Trainman,Nett 17.268,000 20,165.000 23.722,000 28,753,000 25.652.000 115,650.000 52.063,000 168.213.000 40 41 Eastern Collection System 3.000.000 2.152.000 1.010.000 4,836.00[1 5.200.000 1),00).000 22.708.000 39.715,000 41 42 Ome, 5,000 O O O 0 5.000 0 5.000 42 43 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 20.279.000 22.317.000 25.632000 33.588.000 30052,000 132562.000 75,371,000 207.933.000 43 44 Carried&Ewinm--el Peq Rwervp 65.354A00 74,270.000 03.936,550 06,491.550 93,905.550 83,985,550 99.751,550 99.0,51.550 44 45 Sierra of 100.000.000 Costal Reserve 29,775O000 28,750.000 2e.250.000 28,750.000 28.250.000 28.760.000 26,760,000 20,750.000 45 46 Shea of 110.000,000 Erwiron Reserve 2,875.000 2,875,000 2.11 2.876.000 2,8]5,000 2.B]5,000 2,8]5 000 2,83,000 46 47 Portion of I.Is ee Far.Sursw or IDe6a111 33,729,000 42,645,000 51 311.550 54 066,550 82.360.550 BR,3B0 550 88,120,550 89.128.550 47 48 Sinpla Family Roadway Connombn Fee $2.350 $2.350 $2.470 $2.590 112,720 13,480 48 49 Number 4f New E4svorest DWMIin9 Units 700 1,000 1.250 11500 2AO0 2.500 49 60 Eeimaled Connection Fare Income 11,763,000 42,350.000 /3,Oee.000 $3.895,000 151440. 0 111,700,000 50 ro� we0r, no. COUNry SAMrAT1ON DISTRICT NO.2 Rwlsed 4mre3 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Fear 3 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 5.Yea,Total 5-Yea,Total LINE 1992-93 1993-94 199495 1995-96 1995-97 1992.1997 1997-2002 10-YxrTolel LINE 51 BOND FUNDISI 51 52 Ream as&Carry-Owr From Look Year O O 0 0 O O 0 0 52 53 REVENUE 53 54 Tax Larry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 55 Interest&Miccalleneeue Imen. 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O 55 56 Other In. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 57 TOTAL REVENUE 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 57 5& TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 58 59 EXPENDITURES 59 80 Bend Principal&Inbound 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 SO 81 Traealer to Cepltal Froietaa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 82 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 63 R..&Ceny-Cver t0 Neat Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 64 Next Yeai s My Period Fundln9 RorlulremenU O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 65 Fund Balance or IOelicltl O 0 O 0 O O O 0 B5 86 COPFUNDS 88 57 Reaervr&Cmry over From Leet Yee. 8,020,000 19.352,550 13185 550 13 8011080 15.158,000 9,020,000 1B,SOB,CO0 91020,000 BT 68 REVENUE 89 89 New Borrowing 33.269.000 17,000,000 27.000,000 27.000,000 27,000,000 131,269.000 0 131.261.000 69 TO Inures,&Or", 821,000 976,000 010.000 869.000 950,000 4,429.000 4.950.000 9.376.000 70 Tl Tend l Revenue 341090,000 17,978,000 27,810.000 27.859000 27,950,000 135,895,000 4.960.000 140,645,000 Tl 72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 42.110,000 37.328,550 40.995550 41675.000 43.106,000 143.715,000 21458000 149665000 72 93 EXPENDITURES 30.852,000 73 74 Project Coal ransient to t Fiul Facilities FUM 20.273,000 22.317,000 25.029,650 24,300,000 24,300,000 110.219,550 0 116,211,550 74 75 Inlerom Earned Transfers b Operating Fund 821.000 976.000 810,000 869,000 950.000 4.426.000 4.980.000 9.370.000 75 ro Coate of Imarenee 1,663.450 850.000 1,350,000 1.350.000 1.350,000 6.563.450 0 0,563,450 78 71 Other 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 TT TB Total Eapsnditurea 22,757.450 24.143.000 27.189,550 28,519.000 26.600.000 127.209.000 4.950.000 132,159,000 38 79 lleserv®&Cenyrovor to Nest Y., 19,352.550 13.105.550 13,806,000 15,156.000 18,506,000 18.500.000 18,508,000 IB-508,000 79 80 Repaired Debt Service Feaervea 11,609,000 12.456,000 13.808,000 15,156.000 16.506,000 IB,506,000 18.506,000 18,508.000 80 81 Fund Balance 7,746.550 729.550 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 as.N-x„. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 Randall 427193 STATEMENT OF PRCL ECTE0 CASH FLOW Is .s 4 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 TNROUON 2001-2002 5.Year Teal 5-Year Teal LINE 1992.93 1993-94 1994.95 1995.90 1996.97 1992.1997 1997-2002 1O.Year Teal LINE 82 SUMMARY 82 83 Roperves S Carry-Oven From lead Year 92,532.000 122.TI7.550 129,005.550 143.878,550 149,950,550 92,532,000 158.908.550 92.532,000 93 04 Total prevented 991all 04.195.000 100,349,550 103.539.006 107998000 496247.550 366219000 960.463650 84 B5 Total Available Funding 191.098,000 206,902,550 229,954.100 247,415.550 257,957,550 507,))9.550 514,214,550 942,995.550 as 86 Tour Expenditures 6S.990.460 77.297000 86.0)7.550 9),457,000 99.999.000 420.781.000 330.389.000 )67.1)0,000 86 97 Reserves S Carry-Over or Next Year 122.707,550 129,605.550 143,070,650 149,958.550 150.998.560 1 156.998.550 175,825.550 1 175.825,550 97 RESERVES ANALYSIS 88 Next Year'.01,Period Funding Raduimmenu 12,980.000 15,419,000 10,678.000 I91675.000 ".754.000 ".754.000 29J8).000 26J8).000 BS 89 Cen11ngeney Reserved,20%el Oper Rome 3.490.000 3,634.000 4,07e,000 4,384,660 4.746.000 4.746.000 ],4]Bp00 J,4)0,800 e9 90 Debt Berman Res—so and Fund Balenve 19,352.550 13.IB8.650 13,6061000 15.158.000 18.506,000 16.606.000 16.506.000 16,500,000 90 91 Cartel Reaarvo,Bbera of 0100,000.000 20.750.000 20.750.000 2B.760,000 28,760,000 20.750,000 28.750.000 29,]60,000 28.)60.900 91 82 Envlrenmenal nee Rea,Sbara of 110,000,000 2.8)6,000 2,8]6,000 2,0]5.000 2,075,000 2.875.000 2.976.000 2.BJ5.000 2.8)6,000 93 93 Introduce Reserves 56.254,000 $5.742.000 77,591,1160 W,109,550 85.307.550 n.397.550 91.437.650 91.437.650 93 94 Total Appropriated Reaexas 122,707,650 129,a05,550 143,876.550 149.958.550 150.998,560 159,898.550 LJ8,825,850 1J8.935.550 94 95 Unppreprleted Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 88 Tend neaarvad 122,707,560 129,606,550 143,876,550 149,950,660 16B 89it 168 988 560 1]6 826 669 1]6 B2fi fi60 98 DEBT SERVICE RATIOS 97 Senior Lis r Leverage,Min 1.25 4.02 3.05 3.40 3.22 3.10 3.70 97 96 Subordinate Lien Coverage,Min 1.00 3.22 2.03 2.09 1.91 1 90 2.10 99 9B Addltlonn Bonds Year I Sr 8 Sub),Min 1.25 2.B6 2.16 2.12 1.B5 1 73 2.14 99 - rtlPoB.rB u1_M1prl CW SANITATION DISTRICT NO,3 8wind4-27-93 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pacing Agency 6ranaione FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002 Prop Taxes Constant at 92-93 Leval No Fee Clung-Fer 92.93 No COP in 20%Continigenog Bernwing in 96.92 bees-! 5-Year Tonal 5-Year Total LINE 1992-93 1993-94 1994-H 1995-96 1995-97 1992-199T 1997-2002 IOXcar Total LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reeerv-B CelrpOval From last You 34441N W 45,807.000 501639.OW S5.Ne.0 56578,000 34,µ8.000 50,569.OW 34,µe.000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 S,em of l%Tax Allocation 10.518.000 10.5191000 101510.000 10.518.000 10,518.OW 52.590,000 52.590,O01) 10511SO,OW 4 5 Feee:Inewtriel Waste 1,900,0W 2.185.000 2,513,000 2,990.000 3.324,000 12.912.01M 25,772.000 38,584.000 5 8 Vice,Fe- 20.010.01)0 30.940.000 21,299.000 22.703.000 24.292,001) 110,224,00 I641,427,00O 276,051.000 8 2 Iner-tS bSe-Ila—om ln-r— 4,055.O04) 3.532,000 3,890,000 4.199.OW 4,307,000 19.991.000 20.674.000 4g8551000 T e Lwfer fern COP F—d. SW.OW 984.BW 777.000 887.000 920.0W 4.104.000 5.110.000 9,214.OW 9 9 Other Re-rna 2µ,OW 0 0 0 0 744O01) 0 7µ,W0 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 38033.000 38,159.000 39,005.000 41.247.000 43411.000 M.455,400 270523OW 471,028.000 10 I TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 73.081.OW 93A811,O4)(11 891e4,14.OW 96.535.O00 101987.000 234.903.000 30111,142.000 505.476,OW 11 12 EXPENDTURES 12 13 SMre Of imm Wohs M 80 15,386.000 15,079.O1M 17,467,000 19,214,W0 21,135.000 89,0e1.000 141.936.000 231,017,000 13 14 Colmotion Scat—M B O end pincer Oyer. 4.435,000 5.357.O00 4.025,W0 3,358.000 3,324,000 21.097,000 19.265,1000 40,382.000 14 15 COP Servi— 7.053.000 Mimi 12.264,000 15.389.000 19.959.O01) 88,156.000 110.062.O40D 178910.000 15 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 22.424.OW 33.127.000 34,350.W0 37,959.OW 43.410,000 178.334.000 221.1111113.OW 44a.212.000 Is 17 Rwrv-B Cnry Over to Nett Yaer 45.5417.000 W,839.O00 55.288,000 58,57111,000 58.589.0W 58.569.000 57.259,OW 67.259.000 lT 18 Newt Yasls Co,Perisd Fulling ReWiremenx 13.702.OW 18.584.000 17.128.000 19.9W.000 21.70111.001) 21.709.W0 30.211.000 W,211.OW 18 19 20%C—fing—eyR-Iasd COP-rvi-1 3.984,000 4,247,0W 4,418.000 4.514.W0 4,892 4092,000 T.858,000 2850,000 19 20 Poreon of lmeanw Re,SurpN.or lDe0ci0 2T.908.OW 29.8200W 33.0920W 35,082.W0 31,9118.000 31.988.W0 19.392.000 19.392= 20 21 USER FEE DATA 31 22 Single Ferns,R-i00-e Usat F— 073.89 073.89 4T5.00 $80.00 185.00 6135.00 22 22.1 SFR Fee H 92-93 Tat-An Reid by F— $111.01 $112.04 6116.93 1121 80 81 T1.00 22.1 22.2 SFR Fee From 2020 VWccn Meabrplen 61W.00 SI04.00 liI0i $125,00 1125.00 $=.00 22.2 23 Numbn of Equivalent Dwelling Unix 282,988 283.388 283.998 284,788 285,788 291,530 23 24 Esemtled lher Fees 120.910.000 620.940.0010 021,299,000 $22,763,000 124,292,000 139,357.630 24 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT M.3 Penrod 447-93 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pace 2 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1913 THROUGH MI.2002 6-year T.H1 5-Teel Toul LINE 1992-93 1993-94 1994.95 1996-W IW697 1992.1887 1997-201 MY-T0tl LINE 25 CAPITAL FUN0151 25 26 Pro-.S C.111-A ar F- Uol Year 48.02b 000 53.88R 000 60)49,000 88.B01 000 71.298 800 48.025.000 )e 131 6W 411026 000 26 21 REVENUE 27 20 Conetmctlon Glen 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 29 Fe.a'. Connection le"I 1A10.000 1,976,OW 2.590.000 3,126.000 10,OH.OW I8.171,000 28.215.000 29 30 Iodwtriel Wool. 708.000 )]9.OW 8561000 941,000 1.035,000 4.314.000 8,954.000 11,288.000 W 31 Uaer Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 32 Selo of Capacity Rlchln 414.000 451.000 226,000 645.000 590.000 2AM0.000 705.000 3.335.00D 32 33 An....ran Fee. 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 33 34 Iin-09 Mi...0--aa.-1--- 3J]].000 4,248.000 4.795.000 5.180,000 5AS9.000 23.473.000 23.004.000 46.477,000 34 35 Traneler P-,,..d.1-COP Fvnd 23.947,000 N,395.OW 31.893.000 35.345.500 31,500.000 147.480.500 0 147.401 35 36 01her Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 36 37 TOTAL REVENUE 28.184.000 31.282.000 39.748000 45]0)500 42.023.000 1117941.600 40,834.000 236,)]9.500 37 3e TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING ))209.000 88,144.000 100.494.000 114308.500 113.321,500 238966.600 124.908500 204800.600 3e 39 EXPENDITURES 39 40 8hee of Joint Works Treelrmnt Float 19.044.000 22,228.000 28.182.000 31,710,000 20.290.000 127,434.000 SS.078,000 185.513.000 40 43 Dlovon C.Seencr Sao,.. 500.000 2.16).000 5.731,000 11.3001000 8.900,000 28.590.000 131980.000 42.658,000 41 42 DIM, 9.803.000 0 0 0 0 3.803.000 0 3.003.000 42 43 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 23.347.000 24398000 31e03000 43.010000 37100.000 169.635000 73039.000 231.874000 43 44 Cdolal 6 Envlrannwolel Rep Reserves 53.852.000 00.749.000 68.801.OW 71.298.50) 76.131,500 78.131.500 52.926.500 52.926.500 44 46 Shore of 100.000.000 CepON Reaewe 31,8)0.000 31,870.000 31,8)0,001) 31.870.000 31.870.000 31,870,000 31.870.000 31.870.000 45 45 Shore of$10,000.000 Ernewon Pesewe 3.187 000 3,107,000 9 18),000 3.187 000 3.187 GOO 3.187 000 3.187.000 46 47 Pollen al Inkeekres Roo,Surplus or Mallull 18805.000 25.892000 335"000 35,2416W 410)4800 410]46W 1)Be95W 1),3.I9J,o00 989.500 47 48 Sk.01e FaMly Rwi6wue Canneellan Fare $2.350 $2,350 $2,470 12.BW F2.720 03.400 48 49 Nwnkw of New Eerdvolonl DmIlin9 Unils 400 Boo .00 11000 1.150 I'm 49 50 Ee6meled Cenma6en Fee lmeme 19401000 01.410.000 $1976.000 $2,590000 $3.128,000 F4.002,000 50 , t.NIIW>I.M1-NN, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.J MVIVE 4-27-93 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Poll.3 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH MI-2002 5-Year Total 5-Yaer Total LINE 199293 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996.97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total LINE fit BOND FUNDI51 51 52 Rovrves 6 Carry-Owr From East Yesr O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 52 53 REVENUE 53 54 T.LSYy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 55 Inlera.l B Mlsollwtsom Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 55 58 Olbw Instant. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SS 57 TOTAL REVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 6B TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 58 69 EXPENDITURES 59 60 Send Princlpel 6 lnletest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O BO BI Tmmlar to Cepilel FadliBss 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 82 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 63 Flats.6 C.".0ans 10 Nut Yes, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 03 84 Nest Year'.NY PaMd Fuadlnp Rs.ltwltent. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 64 05 Fund Sa ama Or IDa1Ia0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e6 08 COP FUNDS N 67 Ross..6 Carrlpsr From East Y., 6.844 000 20.610.1100 12 2>J 800 13.030.600 15.285.000 6,044.000 17.035.000 B 844000 67 BB REVENUE Be OS Now Sorrowing 30.970.000 1),000000 35,000.000 40.000.000 35.000,000 165.970,000 0 155.970.000 89 70 Intwest 6 OtSar 506.000 584.000 777,000 007,000 970.000 4,104.000 a 110 000 9,214,000 70 71 Total Raven. 39.470.000 17904000 38777000 40887000 36070.000 1]00)4000 8110000 1761114000 ]I 72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 46.320.000 38502600 49050500 54497 SW 51255000 178910000 22148000 182028000 72 )J EXPENDITURES 73 74 Project Cast Transient t.Capital Faollllies FUM 23.347.000 24,386,000 31,893.000 38,345.600 31.600.000 147.490,500 0 147.4110,500 74 75 Innrosl timed Tumlm 1.Gallatin,Fund 506,000 084.000 777,000 867.000 970.000 4,104,000 511101000 0.214.000 75 76 Coal.of lss. 1.948,500 850.000 1.760,000 2.000,000 1,760,000 6,298.600 0 11,290,500 76 )) Odhoo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )) 76 Total E.pmdllures 25.0011500 20.229.000 34.420000 30212,500 34220.000 169593000 5.110.000 104893000 78 70 Reserves 0 Catryeyst to No.t Yor 20.518.500 12.273,500 13,630,600 15,286,000 17.035.000 17,035,000 17.035.000 17.035.000 79 e0 Xapulrod Debt Bono'.Rasonnt 10,986= 11535,000 13288000 15.285.000 17.035.000 17.035.000 1].035,000 17,035.000 80 91 Fund Billions 8833500 730500 348500 0 0 0 0 0 81 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO,3 Rmi..d 4 27 93 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW P.9s 4 FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 20U1-2002 6-yeor Total 5-Y-,Tom LINE 1992-93 1993.94 1994.95 1995.98 1990-97 1892.1997 19972002 10-Y..r Total LINE 02 9U6 ARY 82 93 Reserve S From Lest Yeer 89,317,000 119.987.500 123.661.500 137.519.500 145.159.500 89,317,000 151.735.500 09.317.000 83 84 Total Revenue 10)293.000 87.425.000 114,527,000 127,821,500 121,404,000 558,470,500 324 517000 882 987,500 04 96 Telel AvelMbb Funding 196,010,000 207,412,500 238,188.500 265,341,000 255,563,500 847,787.500 478,252,500 972,304.500 55 80 Total E.Fendltures 76,622.500 83.751.000 100.669.000 120181500 114.028,000 490052000 34803300O 945.004,000 Be 07 Redamee 6 Calrv'0WI to Next Year 119.987,500 123.681.500 137.519.500 145,159500 151735500 151735500 127.220.500 127.220,500 8) RESERVES ANALYSIS 88 Next Years Ors P.rba Funding Requirements 13.737,000 I8.564.000 1),I)8.000 18.980.000 21.709,000 21.709.000 30,211.000 30.211,000 88 09 Committee.,Resenay.20%ol Open From 3,904,000 4.247.000 4.418.000 4,514,000 4.882.000 4.892.000 ].555.0.. ],858,0.0 BB 90 0ebl Service Reserves and Fund Belenee 20,918.500 12.273,500 13,63C,500 15,285,000 17,035.000 17.035.000 17.036.000 17.035.000 90 91 Capital Bosom".S"m of It100,000,000 31.870.000 31,070.000 31.970.000 31,870,000 31,e70,00at 31,970,000 31,8]0,0.0 31,B70,000 91 92 Environmental Rod Fort.She.of 010,000.000 3,1e7.000 3,187,000 3.197.000 3.187.000 3,107.000 3,187.000 3.18].000 3.1e).000 92 93 In.urenoe a..,.. 48711000 55520000 57.238.000 71.323.500 73.042.500 73.042,600 37.261,600 37201600 93 94 Total Appreprleled Reservr 119,807.500 123,581,500 137,519.500 145.159.500 151,735.500 151.736.500 127,22o,500 12),230.800 04 95 UnepplOprleted Ross.. O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 80 Total Reserve. 119907.500 123661500 13J519.500 145159500 151735500 151 ]35500 12)2T0500 12]220600 98 DEBT SERVICE RATIOS 97 Sender Use COvem9e,Min 1.25 5A7 3.39 3.74 3.44 2.97 2.9. 97 98 Subordinate Lien Cmmmge.Min 1.00 3.22 2,00 2.02 1,82 1.55 1.50 98 99 Additional Benda Test 1 Sr B Sub I.Min 1.25 2.5. 2.O7 1.97 1.70 1.55 1,60 99 cam NA.mu enr�e.w uJ,N..r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5 Rendered 4127193 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Poor,A9enoy Mammal... FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH MI-2002 Ford Tames Demand At 92-93 LwMs N.From Changed toe 92.93 Bernmen9ln M97 No COP in 20%Comingmoy Eedimeled 5-Year Total B-Yeer Trial LINE 1992-93 1993.94 1994.94 199596 1996.97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10 Y.,Twel LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Rederyed B Carry-Mew From Last Year 8.765.000 11.952.000 13.336.000 14.551.000 15 311 000 8,705,000 16 88)000 a)68 000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Shan,of l%To.Ali...thin 2.388.000 2.398,000 2.395,000 2.398.000 2,398,WO 11.900,000 11,900.000 23,960,000 4 4 F. led-ftiel Wurs 50.000 58.000 87.000 )),000 99,000 341,000 687,000 1.028.000 5 6 User Fwe 2.003.000 2,608.000 2.703.000 2.781.000 2.1182.000 13.65).000 IGA30.000 30,197.000 6 Idxedt 9 Mi mNlanpm lrcyme 1.411.000 890.000 984.000 1.054,000 1,093,000 5.432.000 5,342,000 10,))4.000 T 8 Fenster teem COP Funds 407,000 171.000 115.000 127,000 130,000 956.000 715.000 1.673,000 e 9 Ones,Revenue 464000 0 0 0 0 484000 0 464000 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 7331000 9123000 9265000 8434000 8578000 33732000 34354.000 80099000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 18098000 10075000 18001000 20906000 21689.000 41497000 61021000 70851.000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Share of John Work.M B 0 1,570,000 1.820.000 1,792.000 1,950.000 2,150,000 9.090.000 14,481,000 23,569.000 13 14 Collection System M 6 0 and Other Game. 759,000 789,000 797,000 837.000 879.000 4,031,000 5.090.000 9,129.000 14 15 COP SnM., 1,015,000 2,360,000 2 471 000 2070000 3 19)000 12)11 000 0 831 GO0 30,232,000 15 19 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4.144000 4739.000 5060000 6878000 6222000 28830000 37.100000 62930000 IB 17 Worvx B Cu'.M.,he hamt Year 11.952.000 13.336,000 14.551,000 16.311,000 15.667.000 15.807.000 13.921.000 13.821,000 O is Nor,Y..,.Dry Perl.d Furring Ra.ulramede 2.072.000 2.370,000 2.5281000 2.838.000 3.1 t1,000 3.111,000 4.049.000 4,049,000 10 19 20%Cia,ungeraY Rea lend COP..Most 466000 470.000 418,000 558000 BOT000 60)000 918000 919000 19 20 Portion of Insurance Rare,Surplus or lDetl.ial 9414000 10490000 11510000 11914000 11949000 11949000 8953000 8953000 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 SirNle Family Food—War Fear $96.75 $90.75 0100.00 $102.60 1108.00 9130.00 22 22.1 WR Fee If 92 93 Team Are Raised by Fears $105.05 1189.66 1190.03 $192.93 $215.50 22.1 22.2 SFR Fee From 2020 Melon Moremminn 0100.00 1100.00 $125.00 1126.00 1124.00 $176.00 22.2 23 Number of E4uWelent Dwelling Unit. 28,904 28.954 17,029 27,129 27,264 28,004 23 24 Estimated War Fuss 12,003,000 02,608,000 12.703.000 12J91,000 12,882,000 03,840520 24 GQA XES rXr7r10 Pro W_ r t COUNTY SANITATION DISTNLT M.5 Revised 412793 STATEMENT OF FROJECTEO CASH ROW Fors 2 FISCAL YEAFlS 1992-19*3 THBOLPOH MI-M2 5-Ymr Total 6-Year Taltl LINE 199293 1993.94 19940.95 less-go 1996-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 IU-Year Total LINE 25 CAPITAL FUNDIM 25 26 Mervee a Crrye rFrom Last Yoor 5B94W00 9860000 11.274000 11925000 14484000 5084000 15134000 5994000 26 27 REVEMIE 27 29 Cms,1.len Grosso, 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 29 Fen: Concoction 118,000 178.000 247.000 324.000 408.000 1.273.000 2.371.000 3,644.000 29 30 IndusVisl W.I. 5.000 5,000 5.000 5.000 5.000 26.000 25.000 MIXING 30 31 User Fen 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 32 Sole of Cepaolty Rights 50.000 64.000 32.000 91,OkD 126.000 371.000 100,000 471.000 32 33 Anco9rien Fen 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 33 34 Imorest a Miacallanarr lcoome 551.000 749.000 822.000 835.000 1.048.000 4,106.000 4,699.000 e.705,000 34 35 Trereler Proceeds from COP FUM 6,278.000 0,052,000 4.050.000 3,150.000 3.150.000 23,480,000 O 23,480000 35 36 Oliver Revenue.Ee Adj.IRWD Con.16 Sole 3543000 1400000 500000 2505000 0 8.028000 0 8028000 96 37 TOTAL REVENUE 10553000 9246000 5.856.000 7090.000 4738.000 37283.000 7095.000 44.378.000 37 38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 18247.000 19.108000 16,830000 19.015.000 18.202.000 42.977.000 22.229.000 50.072,000 38 38 EXPENDITURES 39 40 SVsn of Joins Works Trestment Plms 2.880.000 3.137.000 3,693.000 4.476.000 3.993,000 1).88),000 8.197.000 29.184,000 40 41 Dismiss CelYrien System 3,5M,000 4,685.000 L312.000 75.000 75.000 8.747.O1113r 3.215.MG 12.962.000 41 42 Omrs 109000 0 O O 0 108000 0 109.000 42 43 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8.387.000 7.832000 5008000 4,651.000 4.088.000 27.843.000 11,412.000 39.255.000 43 44 Capital S E monmermal Flee Heeanm 9,s60.000 11.274.000 11.925.000 14.464.000 15.134.000 15.134.000 10,817,000 10.817.000 44 45 Seam of 100,000.000 CepIW Reomm 4.440.000 4,440,000 4,440.000 4.440,000 4.440.0t10 4.440.000 4.440,000 4.440,000 45 48 61rn.1 IMIX)0.000 Emimn From- 444000 444.00W 444000 444,000 444.000 444.000 44e 002 444.000 46 47 Portion of lmurerce For,Sorplur or l0efieitl 4976000 6390 7041000 8580000 10250000 10250000 8833000 5933000 47 4e Sm,le Fronk,ResNecoe Cennec0on F. $2.350 $2.350 02.470 MEN 82.720 $3.480 48 49 Number of New E4uivaNnt OweNrt9 Unity 50 75 100 126 ISO 150 49 50 Ea9rmtef Concoction Fas lnnme $118,000 8178.000 $247,000 $324,O00 k40e.000 $522,000 50 CWNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5 Revised 4127/93 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 3 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002 5-YwrToMl 5-Ywr Total LINE 1992.93 199Y94 1994.95 1995-98 1998.97 1992.1997 1997-2002 10-Ywr Tewl LINE 51 BOND FUNDISI 51 52 Mervw&Cw,,Owr From Lee.Ywr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 63 REVENUE 53 64 Tea Levy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 55 Interest&Miacellanwue Inwme 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 56 01M,Irwoma 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 57 TOTAL REVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 58 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 58 EXPENDTURES 59 80 Bend Pincipel&howest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BD 81 Tmwior to Capital Facilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 at 62 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 63 Res—&Ca,,Owr 1e Navt Yee, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 64 N.Ywi a Dry Perbd Fuming ReWi,xwnb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 65 Fund Golan.a,IDeliei0 0 0 0 O U 0 20 65 66 COP FUNDS 66 87 Rwervee&Carryover Fem Leal Year 8873000 3WB.WO 1808000 2.031.000 2.MG.WG 9673000 2,381.000 9079000 B) 89 REVENUE as 69 New Borrowing 540,000 5,000,000 4,500,000 3.500.000 3,500,000 17,040,000 0 17,040.000 69 TO Intewt&Ot., 407000 171000 116000 127,000 138000 858000 715000 1673.000 70 71 TetN Revwve 847000 5.171.000 4616000 3627000 3.638000 17998000 715,000 18.713.000 Jt 72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 10920000 8079000 6421000 5.658.000 5844.000 27671000 3096000 20386000 72 73 EXPENDITURES 73 74 P,.jwa Cast Tranalen u Capital Facilities Food 6.278.000 6,952,000 4.050.000 3.150.000 31150,000 23.400.000 0 23.480.000 74 75 In.awl Eamed Tmwlen ro Deccan,Food 407,000 171.000 11SWG 127,000 136,000 958.000 715,000 1.673.000 75 JB Costs of 1wu. 27.000 250,000 226,000 175.000 175.000 852.000 0 852.000 78 )) Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 )) 78 Tout E,os ndlwow 6,712,000 7,273,000 4,390,000 3,452,000 J 48J 000 25,290,000 716 000 1 26 005 000 78 79 Rwervw&Carry-over u NNO Year 3.805,000 1.808.000 2.091.000 2.206.000 2.331.000 2,381.000 2,381 000 2.381.000 79 80 RoWlred Debt Service Rssmas, 1.556000 1806,000 2031000 2.208.000 2381,000 2381000 2,381,000 2,381.000 80 81 FuMBelurw 2352000 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 81 ..1W 1P'.essellers. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5 Reverse 4/27193 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CAM FLOW Pepe 4 FISCAL YEARS 1092-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 5-Year Tend 5-Yesr Total LINE 199293 199394 1994-95 1905.00 199697 1992-1997 1997-2002 1O.Yesr T.nI LINE 92 SVMMAHY 82 03 Nonerves 0 Car,,Over from Leer Year 24.132,000 25,720,000 26,416,000 26.507,000 31.901,000 24.132,000 33.102.000 24.132,000 83 04 T.I.1 Pavane 18,831,000 20640000 19538000 17.152000 14,954MQ 88013000 43184000 1311]]000 04 65 Toms Available Funding 42.983.000 46,280,000 42,852.000 45.650.000 48.938,000 112,145,000 76,348,000 ISS,309,000 05 88 Tetel Exp.Milum 17243,000 19e44000 14446000 13819000 13769000 79989000 4922)000 128,190.000 05 07 Reserves 6 Cmrr,'Over is Next Year 25720000 20416000 20,507,000 31981000 33182000 33182000 27.119.000 27119000 07 RESERVES ANALYSIS 88 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Ib4airarnnU 2,072.000 2,370,000 2,525.000 2.838.000 3.111,000 3,111,000 4.149,000 4.149.00* 89 99 Cengng ry ency Resees,20%o1 On.Fig., 460,000 478,000 516,000 559.000 607.000 007.000 819,000 919,090 09 90 Cebl Sarvlee Reserves and Fund Belance 3.908.000 1.808.000 2.031.000 2.206,000 2.301.000 2.381.000 2,3e1.0" 2.381.000 90 91 Central Reserves.Brute.11100.000,000 4,440.000 4.440,000 4,440.000 4.440,000 4.440,000 4,440.000 4,440.000 4.440000 9t 92 EnvirOnmenlel Ree Res,Sher..1$10.000.000, 444.000 444.000 444,000 444,000 444.001) 444.000 444.000 444000 92 93 Insurance Reserves 14390000 16880000 19551000 21484000 22199000 23199000 14888000 14888000 93 94 Appropriated Reserves 25.720,000 26.4111.000 20,607.000 31,981.000 33,182,000 33.182.000 27,119,000 27.119.000 94 95 Unepproprleled Reserves 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 95 96 TOUT Reserves 05720000 26428000 28,607,000 31901000 33183000 33182000 27118000 27118000 96 DEBT SERVICE RATIOS 97 Senior Lien Coverage.Min 1.25 5.00 3.00 3.04 2.01 2.66 1.98 97 BB Subordinate Lien Covers",Min 1.00 3.10 2.01 1.94 1.73 1.61 1.18 98 99 Addlrlenal Bantle Test 1 Sr 8 Sub 1.M.1.25 2.02 2.43 I.S5 1.89 1.59 1.29 99 In.n>m em w.e.e.r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.B Bwleed 4/23193 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CAM FLOW Rating Agern,Dl.wslme, FISCAL YEARS 1992-1893 TNROUGN 2001-M02 Prep Teaw Constant At 93 93 Lower No Fee Changes For 93-94 Sommuln,In 88-97 NO COP In 20%Centimeters, E.BmsM 5 Yen Total 5 Yom Text LINE 1996.97 1992-1997 I987-2002 10-Year Toel LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reaews 6 Carry-O,,or From Last Year 6,737,000 8.640,000 10.066.000 11.293.000 11]99.500 0,737,000 12.117,500 6,737,000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Share e11%Tax Allocation 1,458,000 1.459,000 1,459,000 1,459.000 1,459.000 7,286,000 7,296,000 14,800,000 4 5 Few:Ind-I,mI Wool. 175,000 201.000 231.WO 266.WO "Stow 1.1781000 2.376.000 3.554.000 5 6 U.er Fees 3.W9,W0 3.317.000 3.895.000 4,139.000 4.588.000 18.048,000 31,195.000 50,941,010 e J eem.l 6 MlmNlnwow Income 754.000 BB9,OW 787,000 051.000 881,SW 3,951,OW 4,739.000 B.M0.000 J B Transfer from COP Fund. 1W,W0 144.W0 121,0M 133,000 140,000 WB.OW 722,000 1,SW.000 B B Other Rwsnrx 127000 0 0 0 0 127O00 0 127O00 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 8924000 5.809.OW 8.293.000 8,145000 ).3)2000 32.248000 47,028,000 )92)2040 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12ee1,000 14.448000 16.359.000 1/1141000 191)1,600, 389830041 09143500 86008000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Share of Mike Works M 60 2,536,04)(1 2.517,OOO 2.878.000 3,107.OW 3.484,000 14.903,000 23,39e,000 38,078,000 13 14 Collector,System M 60 am Othan qgr. 201.000 001,0*0 310.000 332,000 349.000 1,600,000 2.020,000 3.619,000 14 15 COP Sells. 1184000 1,405.W0 1 B)1.OW 2.842.600 3221000 10.8535m. to.,..So, 29459.60D 15 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4021.004) 4383.000 6.000.e00 0.341500 7.064.000 29600501) 44,292000 71.157500 10 17 R... ..6 Carry-Ori.r le No..Ywr 8,640.000 10,056,000 11.293,O0() 11.799.500 12,117.500 12.117,5W 14,651,500 14.951.600 LJ 19 Next Yoeis Dry Paled Funding,Requirements 2.011.000 2.192.000 2,633,000 3.171.000 3.627,O04) 3.527,O00 4,915.000 4,915.000 1s 19 20%CwMngesay Rae l sort COP.ervkel 667OW 584000 6390W M0000 )6)WO )6).WO 1.211000 1211 WO 19 M Pont..el Imam er,Res.9urolue Or IUalt00 5 002 WO )290 000 8.121.000 7.928.50c, 7.923.500 7.023.500 S) 500 6)Rfi 500 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Who.Pomil,Rwixems We,Fee O70.47 #70.47 085.00 $95.00 $105.00 I176.0f) 22 22.1 6FR Fare 0 92-93 To.An Relent It,Few $110.12 0110.58 $120.48 $130.42 1200.03 22.1 22.2 SFR Fee From 20W V410r,MwmM.n 175.W $1041.04) I100.00 $10O0() 4100.00 $176.00 22.2 23 Number of EausolaO DNtlllno Units 43.272 43,372 43,472 43,572 43,872 44,172 23 24 Wmtled Use,Few /3.WB.OW $3.317.000 $3.895.000 14,139,000 $4.58e.0W $7,7110.100 24 <Fe w..�as-uam�etewa_Meg COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6 Se rie nd 4I2M3 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pe9e 2 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002 Enimaled 5 Year Total 5 Year Total LINE 199243 1993.94 1994-95 IM-96 199&97 1992-1997 1991.2002 10.Yew Total ONE 25 CAPITAL FUND51 25 26 Sue.B Call-,From Lwt Year 3.888.000 5,401.000 9.2M.000 7.113.000 8.15J 000 3 888,000 9,351.000 3,666,000 26 27 REVENUE 27 26 C4muuction G.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 29 Free: Connection 235.000 235.000 20,000 259.000 272.000 1.248.000 1.580000 2,828,000 29 30 InMtn.1 Waste 61.000 89.000 98.000 108.000 119.000 495,000 798.000 1.293.01 30 31 Use,Face 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 32 Sele of Capacity Rights 71.000 78.000 39.000 111.000 164.000 453,000 120.000 573.000 32 33 Annatal Feu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 34 Interest&AS...11-e0m Inecm9 300.000 431.000 495,000 585,OW 549.000 2.477.000 1.011.000 3.488,000 34 35 Transfer Proceeds from COP Funa 4.152.000 5,456,000 5,750.GG0 8.100.000 5.425.000 20,689.000 74.600 20,963.600 35 36 Olher Rwenoe 1.012,000 O O O O 1.012.000 0 1.012.000 36 37 TOTAL REVENUE 5,887000 8,289,000 6.035.000 9.144,000 6.619.000 34,574.000 3.583.800 38.157.600 37 38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 9,653.000 11.890,000 12869.000 15.257.000 14,770,000 38,240.000 12.934.800 41,823.600 38 39 EXPENDITURES 39 40 Share of Joint Work.T,eetment Plant 3.202.000 3.831.000 4.509.000 5.405.000 4,875,000 21,902.000 10,011.000 31.973.000 40 41 District Collection Si B7O,000 1.BR5,000 1.247.000 ".01 550,000 4,342,000 S.BMOS() 11.022.000 41 42 DIMI.Co.,Trnk Wrath From F5 O 0 0 2.685000 0 2,686.000 0 2.586.000 42 43 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4.152.000 5,456.000 5.756,000 8.100.000 5.425.000 28.889,000 15 B91,000 45.580.000 43 44 Ceptel&Eminst-tci Rep Rwervee 5,401,000 0.234.000 7.113,000 81157.000 9.351,000 9.351.000 13,ne.4001 13.750.4001 44 45 Share of 100.000,000 Coal Reserve 5,470.000 5.470,000 6.470,000 5.470.000 5,470,000 5.470.000 6.470.000 5,470,000 45 46 Share of$10,000.000 Emimn Reserve 547,000 847.000 547.000 547,000 54],000 fi4J 000 54].000 54].000 46 4J PoFBon of lru0rww0 Reactor 1818.0001 21 J,000 11096,000 3 140.000 3.334000 3.3.4,000 19.]J9.4001 9]73 4001 47 48 Single Finally Residence Connetion Fee $2,350 $2.350 82.4J0 $21590 42,720 03.490 48 49 Numbs of Now Equivalent Dwelling Unite I 100 100 ISO 100 100 49 50 E.OmetW Cloneotion Fee 1-ma 8235,000 4235,000 4247,ODO $259p00 S272.000 $340.000 50 Wt .3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.8 Rameed a/23/93 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pao.3 FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 5 Year Total 5 Ycor Total LINE 1992-93 1993.94 1991 1995-96 1996-97 1992-1997 1997 2002 10 Y.,TObl LINE 51 BOND FUN0151 - 51 52 Beservn 8 Carry-OVBr From Lmt Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 53 REVENUE 53 54 Tex LwV O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 65 Interwar 0 MiscellBneow Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 56 OIM,Incomo 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 58 57 TOTAL REVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 58 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 59 EXPENDITURES 59 60 Good Principal 6lnlsrwat 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 60 91 Tremler m CePlbl Facill9w 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 61 e2 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 O 63 93 Ressrva@ 9 Grr,-Over b Nest Year 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 63 04 Nast Year's Dry Pariod Fuadn,Wauhanbnb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 65 Fmd Sal—at Galosh) 0 0 0 a 0 0 O 65 66 COP FUNDS da 67 Reserves A Ca,r worn Form Last Year 348000 3995600 1005000 2220000 2199000 348.000 2.474.d00 348,000 07 68 REVENUE 88 89 New Betrayal., 7.148.000 4.500.000 8.500.000 9.500.000 6.000.000 32,649.000 0 32.640,000 69 TO Iroo.a dMr 100000 144000 121000 133.000 140,000 638000 723000 1380000 70 71 Total Raeanw 7248000 4.Sa4.000 6.621.000 8.633.000 0.140000 33.286.000 MOOD 34.008,000 71 72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 7596000 7630600 6428800 10857600 9339600 33,634.000 3195,000 34.358000 72 73 EXPENDITURES 73 74 Project Coat Transfer@ N Capitol Fav199x Fund 4,152.000 61456.000 5.]56,000 8,100.000 5,425,000 MISSING 74,000 20,963,000 74 75 Inbreat Emmd T.N.to O,..d,Fund 100,000 144.000 121,000 133.000 140.000 038.000 722.000 1,300,000 75 76 Coab.11.... 357.400 225,000 325.000 425,000 300.000 1,832,400 0 1,632,400 70 TT Other 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 T] 7e Total Expen®turns 4,609,400 5,625,000 6,202.000 81850.000 5,955.000 J1159400 ]N0000 31956000 JB 79 Really@@ O Carryover to Next Year 2,986,800 1.805.300 2,224,600 2.198,600 2.474.600 2,474.600 2,400,000 2,400,000 ], 80 Real Deal So lea Rotarvea 1 125.000 1.350 000 1.675.000 21100.000 2.400 0000 3.400.000 2.400.000 2.400,000 e0 01 Fwd Balama 1,881,600 455,800 549,600 Holm ]4.000 74,600 0 0 81 case aa.Ne-.mw.v:.w Nn COUNIY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6 R.Ised 4423/93 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pegs 4 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THRWGH MI-2002 5 Year Total 5 Yser Total LINE 1902-93 1993-94 1994.95 1995-96 1996-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Y.r Tatty LINE 82 SUMMARY 62 83 Reserves S Com Aver From Lot Year 1O.751,000 17,027,600 10.105.600 20.630.600 22.150,100 10,751.000 23,943.100 1OJ51,000 83 64 Total From. 19.058000 16.742,000 19.549,000 24,625.000 20.131.000 100.106.000 61331800 151.437.600 84 85 Total Available Funding 29.810.000 33.769.000 37.854,000 45,255,600 42.287.100 110.857.000 76,274,100 162.188.900 e5 BB Total Expmdllvrss, 12.782.400 15.660.000 17.024.000 23.099.500 10.344.000 06,913.900 81.]]9800 149693500 88 87 B..rv.0 Cerry,OY.,to Next Year 17.027.800 18.105.1100 20.1130,600 22,166.100 23.943.100 1 23,943.100 13.495 100 1 13,495 too 87 RESERVES ANALYSIS eB Next Ymr's Ory period Funding Ractimmmb 2,011.000 2.192.000 2.533.000 3,171.000 3.527.000 3.527.000 4.918.000 4,915.000 Bs 89 Contingency Revs ,20%at Otter Room 667,000 504,000 639,000 700,000 767,000 787,000 1,211,000 1.211.000 88 80 Debt Sorrier,Reality.and Fund Selersa 2.986.800 1.905.800 2.224.600 21199.600 2.474.600 2.474.000 2.400.000 2.400.000 SO 91 Cepitel Reserves,St—el 9100,000,000 5,470,09e 5,470,000 5,470,000 5.470,000 5,470,000 5.470.000 6,4M,000 5.470.000 81 82 E—ironmonml Reg Res,She.of$10.000.000 547.000 547.000 547.000 547.000 547.000 547,000 847.000 547.000 92 83 Insumme Reserves 6448000 ]50]000 9217000 10.008500 11167600 11167,600 1047900 11.047.9001 93 94 Appropdeted Reserves 17,027.000 18.100,600 20,030.600 22.150,100 23,943,100 23.943,100 13,485,100 13.495.100 94 98 Un.prAlliatad ReaerveB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 96 Total Passives 17,027,000 18,105,600 20,630,640 22,156,100 23 943100 28 943100 13,496,100 13 495 1S0 98 DEBT SERVICE RATIOS 87 Senior LMn Coverage,Min 1.25 8.50 10.12 0.87 4.17 3.81 3.64 97 88 9Werdlmta Lim Cewrege,Mln 1.00 3.22 2.54 2.13 1.55 1A7 1.46 H 99 Additional Bond.Test 1 Sr 0 Evil),Min 1.25 2.04 2,80 2.19 1.55 1.60 1.55 H d Y,C IM Nt COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.T Robed 4127M3 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Rating Agemy Dimetlmn FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 Prop Tapes Constant At 92.93 Lauri No Fee Cbenees in 93-94 No COP in 20%Contingency Ei t mated 5-Your To41 6-Vur Tod, LINE 1992-93 1993-94 199495 1995-90 1996-97 19921997 19972002 10-Year Tetel LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Rmenm B Corry-Ouer From Les,Your 13]2).000 18.471.000 21.831 iOOO 23.537.000 24,871.000 13,777.000 25,113,000 13,7)).00D 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 6Mn of 1%Tax Allmslien 3,257,000 3,257,000 3,257.000 3,252,000 3.257.000 19,285.000 16.285,000 32,570,000 4 5 Fees:Ind—Inel Waste 840.000 966,000 1.111,000 1.278.000 1.420,000 5.605.000 11,405.000 17.O70.000 5 8 Um Fem 6.235.000 5.237.000 5,242.000 5.503.000 5,778.000 28,993,000 33,958.000 001951.000 8 T Interest B MneNlanmus Income 1,888.000 1,423.000 I.800,000 1,700,000 1.761,000 8.158.000 8,129.000 10,287.000 B Trensler from COP Funds 151.000 163.000 227.000 277.000 301.000 111191000 1,272,000 2,391.000 8 9 Other Pavane 367,000 0 0 0 0 352,000 0 357.000 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 11.508,000 11,04e.000 11,432.000 12.021,000 12.565.0D0 58,5]],000 71,049,000 129.626.000 10 it TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 26.285.000 29.517.000 33,268.000 35.558,000 37.436.000 22,354,000 98,IO2,000 143.403.000 Il 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Shers el Joint W.A.M&0 3.399.000 3,507.000 31856.000 4.244,000 4.06B.000 19.675.000 31,352,000 51,028,000 13 14 C011mtien 9ntem M&O end OlM,Died. 1,688.000 I.4187,000 2.481.000 I,875,000 1.069,000 9.6W.000 11,062.000 21.202.000 f4 IS COP Srvice 1.827,000 2.492.000 3,392.000 4.568.00O 5,e86.000 17965,000 32.101,000 501068,000 IS 10 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6.014,000 7,600,000 9,731,000 IO1607.000 12.323,0DO 47.241.000 75.115000 122.350.000 18 IT Rmowers B Carry-Wu to Next Year 19,471,000 21,831,000 23.537.000 24,871,000 25.113,000 25.113.000 21.O47,000 21,047,000 tT 18 Nest YmM1 Dry Period Funding Requirements 3.407,000 3.843,000 4.866,000 5.344,000 0,162,000 6,102,000 8.231.000 8.231.000 10 19 20%Contingency Res l epcl COP sr,iml 997,000 1.039.000 1,280.000 1.224.000 1,]2T.002 1,]3T,000 R,OOB4OOr] 2,OO8,000 19 20 Portion el Insurance Res,Surplus or IDoficitl 14,007.000 16.949000 IT.403.000 18,303,000 17.624.000 1T.024.000 10.800000 1 10808000 20 21 USERFEEDATA 21 22 Single Family Residence User Fee $50.09 $60.09 $50.09 $52.50 $55.00 472.50 22 22.1 SFR Fee It 92-93 Tepu Are Faleed by Fees $81.23 $61.21 083.58 086.02 *102.92 22.1 22.2 SFR Fee From 2020 Vision Mas,srplan 350.00 $50.00 F50.00 476.00 475.00 0125.00 22.2 23 Number of Equivalent Grudging Units 104.611 104,581 104.881 104,011 105.011 107,001 23 24 Estimated User Fees $S.235,000 36,237.000 $5,242.000 45,503,000 $5J36,000 gJe1.923 24 e11 Ar u.4,N 9,9Wit Far COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.J Raeind V2793 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pep 2 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2W2 5-Year Total 5-Year Tonl LINE 1992.93 1893.94 199"S 1905.80 1996-97 I092-I997 1887-2002 10-YnrToral LINE 25 CAPITAL FUNDI51 25 26 Ro mis A Cm,,-mrsr From Lee,Year 19.810,000 25.062,000 27.471.000 30.158.000 33.303000 18810000 30,817000 18810000 20 27 REVENUE 27 29 CemOVafen Grn0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2B 29 Finite: Connection I111.000 235.000 371.000 518.000 680,000 1,922.000 9.055,000 9.8)).000 29 30 InOue,riel Wnro 201.000 211,000 222.000 233.000 245,000 1.112.000 1,422.000 2.534.000 30 31 War Fax 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 31 32 Se1e of Cooled,Fip6Y 83.000 1011000 51.000 144.000 200.000 588.000 I60.000 749,000 32 33 Ar meatien Fen 0 0 0 0 33 34 Intarea,B Miacol mono ,Imams 1.591.000 1,962.000 2.043,000 2.250.000 2.489.000 10,235.000 11,561.aW 21.796.000 34 35 Transfer Proceeds loom COP Fund 8,040,000 8.951.000 11.MB,Wo 10,840.000 7.853,000 47,998,OW 713.350 49.711.350 35 38 Other Revenue 3.249,000 0 O 0 0 3.248.O00 0 3.249.000 36 37 TOTAL REVENUE 13,888.000 11.360000 14.395,000 13.905.000 11.487000 95.105.000 21911,350 87AI6A50 37 38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 33.7O11000 38,422.000 41.898.OW 44.143. 0 44,770,000 84.815,000 58.828.350 1O0826,350 39 38 EXPENDITURES 39 40 SM.el Joint Worse Treemom,Plant 1,280.000 4.972.000 5.852.000 7.093.000 6.329.000 28.505.000 12.990.000 41,495,000 40 41 Diane,COlNmen SYetem 4.3911.O00 3,879.000 6,850.000 3,70,O00 1.52iOW 18.493,000 14.045.000 34.138,000 41 42 Over 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 43 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8.046.000 9.951,000 II7080110 10.040.000 7,853.000 479980W 271136.00)(D 75.533.000 43 44 Capital 6 Emimoremal Re,Rnervea 25.062.000 27.471,O0D W.158.O00 33,303,0001 38.917.0410 35.917,W0 31,193.350 31,193.350 44 45 Share.1100.OW,0W Coaitel Rear-, 7.130.O0O 7.130.000 J.IWIp 7,130.000 7,130,000 7.1W.000 7.130.000 7,1 W,GW 45 46 Share of 010,000,001)Emimn Roeme 713.000 713.0110 713.0100 713,000 713.OW 1 7130100 713000 1 713000 46 47 Portion 011neuurms fln,Surplm at lDalitdrl 1J218000 18628W0 223150W 254WW0 280J0000 290)4000 3d 350960 23,360.350 47 49 &nole Family Reaidom»Connection Fee 02.350 82.350 $2.470 02,590 $2.720 $3,400 48 49 NumMr of New E4uNe1ea1 DWallin9 Unix. 50 100 IN 2W 250 TOO 49 EO Estmeated Correction Fee Income 8118.004, 1235.W0 837I,e00 F519.000 F8B0.000 12.430,000 50 csr are as cl.-.».R see, , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.] Bevisatl 4127/93 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 3 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01 2002 5-Veer Total 5-Yen Tood ONE 1992-93 1993.94 1994-95 1995-96 1990-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total UNE 51 BOND FUNDISI 51 52 Rosary..&Ceny-0ver From Lap Year O O O 0 0 O O O 52 53 REVENUE 53 54 Tax Lavy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 55 Interest&M6.0 aneaw Ineems 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 56 Oaner Inca", 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 57 TOTAL REVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 59 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 69 EXPENDITURES 59 SO Bend Pnnapal IS Murrell 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 BO S1 Transfer Is Capital Facilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 62 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 62 03 R...rvw&Carry-N.,1a Next Year O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03 64 Neal Years Dry Period Funding Re4usenwrls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04 05 Fungi Balance or IDefic111 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 05 66 COP FUNDS as oT Revervee&Cerry-uvsr From Last Year 3,089,000 1.960.350 3.459.350 4.101.350 5.139350 3.089.000 4,083,350 3,009,000 97 60 REVENUE a8 69 New Borrowing 7.913.000 11,000,000 13.00010" 12.500,01D0 0.000.000 52,413,000 0 52.413.000 a9 70 Intsreal A Other 151,000 163.000 227,000 2]],000 301,000 "118,000 1,272.000 2.391.000 ]O TI Total Revsrwe 8.O64.000 11.163.000 13,227.000 12.777,000 8.301.000 53.532.000 1,272.000 54,004,000 71 72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 11,153,000 13.123.350 10,686.350 16,870,350 13.437350 56621,000 6.155.350 57.893.000 72 73 EXPENDITURES 73 A Project Cost Transient to Capitol Feeilitin Fund 8.64a,000 8,951,000 11,708.000 10.840,000 7.853.000 47.998.000 713,350 40,711.350 74 75 Interest Earned Trendier.to Occasion,Fund 161,000 153.000 227.000 2]],000 301.000 11119.000 1.272.000 2p81,000 76 7a Co.,.01 Wde nce 395.650 550,000 0501000 025.000 400,000 2,020,050 0 2,020,650 76 T] Other .O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 ]J 79 Tend Expenditures 9.192.650 9,064,O00 12,505.000 11.742.000 0.554,000 51,737.050 1.985.350 53.723000 79 79 R...—&Cerryawr 10 War Year 1,860.350 3,459.350 4.101,350 5.138,350 4.883,350 4.883,350 4.170,000 4.170.000 79 BO Request!DMt Somice Bassrvoe 1,945,000 2,495,000 3,145.000 3,]]0,000 4.170.000 4.170.000 4.170,000 4,170.000 00 81 Fund Balms 16.350 964,350 950,350 1,308,350 713,350 713,350 0 O 91 CWNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.9 Revised 4127re3 STATEMENT OF PNO3ECTEO CASH FLOW Ford.4 FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 5-Year Total 5-Year Total LINE 1992-93 1993-94 199495 1995.96 199657 1092-1997 1992-2002 IO-Yesr Total LINE 82 SUMMARY 82 63 Res6rves 6 Carr,- .,Frans Lest Year 36,836,000 45.493.350 52.761.360 $7.790,350 63,310,350 36.676.000 88.913.350 36.078.000 83 84 Total Revenue 33,470,000 33.589,000 38,068,000 38,783.000 32,333,000 177,214.000 94.232.360 271.446.350 94 85 Total Available Funding 70,146,000 "Af12,350 91,020.350 96,679.350 95.643.350 213,890.000 181.145,"0 30BA 22.350 85 e6 Total Expenditures 24.652.650 26301,000 34,024,000 33,269.000 28,730000 140,970.050 104,J35 350 251.712.000 86 BT Reserves 6 Carry-Over,to NLBt Year 45493.350 52261,350 67J90.350 63,310.350 66,913,350 1 66,913.350 56.410,350 1 58410.350 87 RESERVES ANALYSIS 88 Next Year's Dry period Fundln9 R...nan a. 3,407,000 3.843,000 4,006,000 5.344.000 8,162,000 0,102.000 0.231A00 0,231.000 88 89 Contingency Reaervm,20% al Oper Rqmt 997.000 1.o39p00 1.268.000 1.224.000 1,327,000 1.327.000 1,008,000 2.008.000 89 90 Debt Servlee Reserves and Fund Callen 1,900,350 3.459.350 4.101,350 5.135,350 4,803,350 4.883.350 4,130,000 4,120.000 90 91 Capital,Reserves.SM1are of$100.000.000 7,130,000 7,130,000 7,130,000 7.130.000 7.130,000 7,130,000 2,130MO 7.130,000 91 82 Enalronmental He4 Rea.Stara.1610.000.000 713,000 713.000 713.000 713.000 113,000 713.000 713,000 713.000 92 93 Insurance Reeervea 31286,000 38.5]].000 39,718,000 43,283,000 48,688,000 48898000 34158350 34.168.360 93 S4 Appropriated Reserves 45,493.350 52.761,350 57,796.350 03.310,350 06,913.350 88,813,350 56,410.350 56.410,350 94 95 Unappropriated Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 96 Total A.... 45,493,350 52,701,350 57,796.350 53.310.350 66.913,350 68 913350 56,410 350 50,410,350 95 OEBT SERVICE RATIOS ST Smier Lien Leveread,Min 1.25 9.69 7.33 6.08 4.28 3.52 3.53 97 96 Subordineta Use Cartledge,Mn 1.00 4.67 3.32 2.30 1.90 1.68 1.66 98 99 Additiaml Bends Test I Sr 8 But,I.Min 1.25 6.29 3.42 2.43 1.78 1.64 1.00 99 .... ..so NHm COUNTY SANITATION DISTMCT NO.n Re feed 4127193 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Bating Annoy Dis0 rsslans FIWAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 20011002 Prop Teie Canelem At 92-93 Leval No Fee Ching-For 93.94 Emmering In 96.97 Nor COP In 20%Conlingen0y Estimated SXeer Teul 6-Year Tatel LINE 799223 1993-94 1994-95 1995.96 1990.97 1992.97 1997-2DO2 10-Yeor Taus LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Raseran B Carry-Over From Usl Ter 12.995000 14,D12 OOO 14,5]5.000 14A82,OOO 14.681,000 12.335.000 15,047,000 12,335.000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 S5ere 9f 1%To.AllaegOn 21059.000 21O69100D 2.059.000 2.059,000 2.059,000 10.295.000 10.295.000 20,590,000 4 5 Feet:InMlrlel Were 29O,0W 322,000 370,000 42O.00O 490.000 1,888,000 3.804.000 5,692.000 5 6 Use,Fee 3.O65,OW 3,074,000 3,857.000 4.915,000 51990.000 2O,9O1.01DO 42,802,000 53,503,000 e I.e.,6 Misnllsreee lno9me 1.159.000 1.001.000 1,023.000 1,027.000 1.047.000 5,267.000 51805,000 11,062.000 ) 8 Toosler for.COP Wnb 264.000 335.00O 184,000 1901000 103,000 1.108.000 1.030.000 2,100.000 8 9 Otiar Reeve 157.000 0 D 0 0 157.00O 0 I57 000 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 8,994O0O 0,701000 7.493,000 6,617,000 9.))9,000 39.084.000 63.536.000 103,200,000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 19.319.000 2OW3.00O 22,068000 23,099.000 24,460.000 6198800O 78,583,000 115,535.000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 Sbere of Joint Works M 8 O 9.O2O.00O 3,123,000 3.435.000 3.))9.000 4.157.000 17.52O.000 2).91),000 45.437.000 13 14 Colleegon System M 9 O eM Other Opsr. 005.000 908,000 1.463,OOO 1.126,000 982,000 5.3%.000 5.699.000 11,O39,OW 14 15 COP Sarvloe 1416.000 2197.000 2.698WO 3.513,000 4,2)4,000 14099000 26290.000 39394000 16 16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6307.000 8.228,000 7,580,000 8418.000 9,413O0D 38962000 5a913000 95984.00) 16 I] Rearver,9 Lerry-Onrr to Nnl Tom 14.012.000 14.575,000 14,482,000 14,681.000 15,047,000 16.047,000 I9,671.00O 19,071.000 17 18 Neat Year's Dry Period Funding R84Wrenenls 2.654,000 3.114.00r) 3.]93.000 4,2O9.00O 4.)0).000 4,)O].000 8.6O4,WO 6.504.000 18 19 20%Domingetey Re front COP—lee) ]]8.000 808000 978.00O 961.000 1.O29.OW 1O20.OW I,fiW,DOO 1,bW.000 19 20 Portion of Insurance For.Surque or IDefiasO 1O59O0W 10658000 9)11.000 9491000 9312OW 8.12000 11.8)]WO 116))000 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Smile Family Presidents User Fe $60.00 $60.O0 $75.00 195.01D $115.00 $19O.01) 22 22.1 SIR Fee if 92.93 Teem Au Ralsed by Fees $100.19 0115.O2 0134.O1 $154.54 0228.17 22.1 22.2 SM Fee From 2O2O MSI0n 03asempsen 0150.00 417S.W F175.010 FI75.00 4175.00 82OO.00 22.2 23 NI el E4ul osem Dwelll',Units 51.093 61.223 51.433 $1,703 52,093 58,983 23 24 Estimated User F. $3,065,000 03.074.000 F3,857.000 F4,916.O0O $S.M.= 81O,247,27O 24 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 Hrvbed 4127I83 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Paw 2 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH MI1 !002 Estimated S-Veer Total S-Ywr Total LINE 1992-93 1993.94 1904-95 1995-96 1096-97 1992-97 1997-2002 10-VearTmal LINE 25 CAPITAL FUND151 25 28 Few.8 Carryover From Lear Year 8,580.000 12.286,000 13,882.000 15.785,000 16,935,000 8,5B0.000 IB.9B0.000 0.580,000 20 27 REVENUE 27 28 Construction Grants 0 O 0 O O 0 0 28 28 Fwe: Connection 353,000 470.000 741,000 900,000 952.000 3.423,000 6.925.000 9.348.000 29 30 Industrial Waste 80.000 84,000 88,000 92.000 97,000 N1.000 563.000 1.004,000 30 31 User Few 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 32 Sao of Capacity Rights 78.000 85.000 43.000 12L000 169,000 497,000 135.000 032.000 32 33 Annexation Few 500.000 0 0 0 0 500J000 0 500.000 33 34 Interest 0 Marcel enea-Income 722.000 927,000 1,051.000 1,160,000 1.273,000 6.133.000 0.363.000 11,49e,000 34 35 Transfer Pmceede from COP Fund 4.600,000 11,252.000 8.019.000 8.408,000 7.650.000 39.929.000 0 39.929.000 36 36 Other Revenue 1,983.000 0 O O 0 1.983.000 6.000 1,991.000 3e 37 TOTAL REVENUE 6.316.000 12.810.000 9.942.000 10.989.000 10.141.000 51.900,W 12.994.000 64.900.000 37 38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 16.896,000 25,114,000 23,604,000 26.494.000 2T.070.000 00,48e000 31.974.000 73,400,000 38 39 EXPENDITURES 39 40 Shere Of Joint Works Trwrment PIwr 3,600.000 4,202,000 4,946.000 5,994.000 5,348.000 24,090.000 10.979.000 35,068.000 40 41 Oatdet Collection system 1100010O0 T,OSo.MO 3,073.000 3.545.000 2.749.000 17,419,000 2.945,000 20.361,000 41 42 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 43 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4.600.000 11.252.000 8.018.000 e639.000 8.096.000 41,506,000 13.923.000 55.429.000 43 44 Capital G Ewlrervmntel Fee Reserves 12,286.000 I3,11152,000 15,785,000 16,935,000 18,980,000 18.980.000 18.051.000 18,061,000 44 45 Share of 100,000,000 Capital Reserve 5,990.0p0 8.980.000 8.980.000 5.980.000 5.980.000 81980,000 5.980.000 5,880.000 45 46 Share of 110.000.000 Enown Reserve 589.000 68B.OU0 596 0 598.000 598,000 598,000 598.000 698.000 48 47 Perti9e of lmwenw Res,SmplOe Or(Deficitl 87111001) 7,284000 9,207,000 10.357.000 12.4 40 02.000 1 2000 11 473000 11.471,000 47 46 Single Family Mallows Connection Fee $2.350 02,350 $2.470 $2,590 $2.720 $3.480 48 49 Number of New Equivalent Dwelling Units 150 200 300 350 350 375 48 60 Estimated Cenmetion Fw Income 0353,000 9470,000 0741.000 F907,000 $952.000 11,305.000 50 . N. leWxs. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 Bwised 4/27/83 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 3 FISCAL YEAR31992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 6-Year Total 6 Year Total LINE 1992-93 199394 199455 1995-90 1996-87 1992-97 1997-2002 10-Year Tool LINE 51 BOND FUNDISI 61 52 Resew"Is Carry-O✓er Ftem Lee,Yeer 22000 20,000 17,000 14.000 12.000 22000 10.000 22.000 52 53 REVENUE 53 54 Tex Levy 12.000 12.000 12.000 13,000 13,000 02.000 2BADD 90.000 54 55 Interest 9MlsaNlaneoue lrrrome 2.000 1.000 1,Wo 1,000 1,000 6,000 1.O013 7,000 56 58 DIM,Mwrns 0 0 O O 0 0 D 0 58 57 TOTALXEVENUE 14,000 13.001 13.000 14.000 14,000 68.000 29,000 97.000 57 68 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 36.000 331000 30.000 28,000 20,000 90.000 39,000 119.000 56 fig EXPENDITURES 59 60 Bend Rineipal B Interest 16.000 18.000 ie,00o 161000 181000 80.000 31.00D 111.000 Bo BI Transfer W Capital Facilities 0 O 0 O 0 0 8.000 8.000 8t 62 TOTAL EXPENDITURES IS,000 16000 10000 10.000 16000 80.000 39.000 119000 82 W Reserves 8 Cin y-Over to Next Year 20,000 17,000 14,W 12.000 10.000 10,000 0 0 03 64 Next Yesi s Dry Period Funding Re4uiremonls 20,000 17,000 MOOS 12.000 10.000 10,000 0 0 64 86 Fund Balance or IDBlWW 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 95 69 CW FUNDS 66 87 Rwervo 6 Cerrynwr Frem Lee,Year 432.000 81356.000 2.804.000 3.335.000 3,002,000 432.000 3,427.000 432,000 W BB REVENUE Be Be New Eritrean, 13,183,000 81000,000 SA0 OS* 8,500,MO 8.500.000 45,183.000 0 46.183.000 69 TD Intsreel B Osten 294,000 335.000 I04.000 190.000 193.000 1.180.000 1,030,000 2,196.000 70 71 Total Rwenue 13.447.000 8.335.000 9.194000 CAWOOD 6.693.000 48349.000 1,030.000 47.379.000 TI 72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 13,879.000 14691.000 11.989.000 12.025.000 11.885.000 46781.000 41457.000 47,1311.000 72 73 EXPENDITURES 73 74 Project Cost Territory to Capful Frei Fund 4.600.OW 11.252.000 8.010.000 0.408.000 7.650.000 39,929.000 0 39,929.000 74 75 Inletest Earned Tremfers to Cornering Fund 264,000 335.000 184,000 1901000 193,000 1.166.000 1,030,000 2.196.000 75 )6 Cents 01 Issue- 659,000 300000 450.000 425,000 425,000 2.259,000 0 2,259.000 TO )) OIM1er O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 )) 78 Total Expenditures 5,523,000 11,887,000 8,853.OW 91023,000 8,268,000 43.354,000 1,030,000 44,384.000 76 79 0oaerves 9 Cenycver to Next Ymr 8,35B4O00 2,804.000 3,335.000 3,002,000 3.427,000 3.427.000 3,427.000 3,427,000 79 00 Resulted Mal Ssrvies Reserves 1.827.O00 2127.000 2.6)),OW 3,002.000 3.427.000 3427,000 3.427000 3,427,000 90 01 Fund Belame 6.529000 8)).000 750OW 0 0 0 0 0 all am.a_R _ .-Passe COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 flwised 4/21V93 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 4 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001.2002 5-Year Total S-Yesr Teta1 LINE 1992.93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-93 1992-97 1992-2002 10-Year Total UNE B2 SUMMARY 82 83 Rani&Carry Ovar From Lest Year 21,369.000 34,084,000 31.256.000 33,616.000 34,630,000 21,369,000 37,464.000 21.369.000 83 84 Total Ravanus 20,761.000 25,957,000 26,632.000 20,010,Oe0 28,627,000 137,987,000 77,589,000 215,676000 84 85 Total Available Funding 50.130.000 60.641,000 57,080,000 81.626.Oee 63.257.000 159.356.000 115.053.000 236.945.000 85 86 Toted Expenditures 15.448,000 29.383.000 24.274.0,00 26.995.Oee 25.793,000 121.892,000 73.904.000 195.796.000 88 87 Reserves&Carry-Over,to Next Year 87 RESERVES ANALYSIS 88 Next Year a Dry Period Funding Requirements 3.674.000 3.131.000 3,907,000 4,221,000 4.717,000 4,717.000 0,504,000 8.504:000 88 09 Contingency Reserve,209E of Oper Rome 778.000 006.000 978,000 981.000 1,020,000 1.028,Oee 1,59e,000 1,590,000 08 90 Debt Service Reserves and Fund Balance 8.356.000 2.804,000 3.335.000 3,002,000 3.427,000 3,427.000 3.427:000 3,42T,000 90 91 Capital Reserves,Share of Bl ee,000,000 5.990.000 5,900,000 5,980,000 5.980,OOe 5,980,000 5,980.000 5,98e000 5.990,Do0 91 92 Envinormembel Real Rise.Share at$10.000.000 598.000 590,000 598.000 590,000 698,000 590.000 593,000 598.000 82 93 Insuraxafles— 16,298.0.0 17,939,000 18.919.000 19.848.000 21.714.000 21.714.000 23.050.000 23,050,000 93 94 Approprieled Rmarv» 34,084,000 31.268,000 33,616.000 34.630,000 37,464,000 37,464,000 41,149,000 41.149.000 94 95 Unappropriated Rarm— 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 95 96 Talal Reserves 34,684.000 31258000 33616.000 34,930.000 37,464,000 32.464,000 41.149.000 41.149.000 96 DEBT SERVICE RATIOS 97 Same,Lien C—iinge,Min 1.25 11.15 &70 8.23 5.30 4.71 5.08 97 98 Subordirab Lien Coverage,Min IX0 3.05 1.97 1.68 1.71 1.07 1.90 98 99 Addlllonal Banda Two l Sr&Sub I.Min L25 2.74 1.97 1.89 1.50 1.04 1.95 99 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 Remixed 04127193 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pep 1 FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2001-2002 Eellmetil 5-Year Talal S`Ymer TOW LINE 1992.93 1993.94 19.4-95 1995.99 199597 1992-1997 1907.M2 I&Yaar Tetel LINE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Reeervw 6 CGG,Over From Unit Yem 1.012,000 1,127,000 1,247,000 11359,000 1p98,000 1,012000 1876000 1,012.000 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 SMIs 0f I%Tax AlbuWn 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 Faec:Inetindal Waste 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 B Ueer F. 674,000 694,000 732,000 701,000 832,000 3,713,000 5.0011000 8,714,000 8 Intoet 3 Mumallermov.lrwame 75,000 04,000 92,000 100,000 10&000 480.0100 007,000 1.067,000 T a Tritest.,from COP Funde 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e 9 Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10 TOTAL REVENUE 750.000 778.000 e24,000 ee1000 940000 4173.000 61108000 9,791.000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 1,252,000 11805.000 2071000 2240000 2.409,000 6186000 7182000 10,793.000 11 12 EXPENDITURES 12 13 SM.Of Joint Work.M 9 O 434.000 448.000 493.000 542.000 5801000 2,513,000 4.4106,000 a,518,000 13 14 Collection System M 80 end Odi Ooor. 173,000 182,000 191.000 201,000 211,4100 958,000 1,227,000 2.188.000 14 16 COP Soi 28.000 28.000 29000 28.000 29.000 140.000 140.000 280,000 15 18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 635,000 958,000 712,000 ))1.000 835.000 3811000 8372000 e.983.000 I9 17 Removes 6 Cerry-Over to Next Year 1.127,000 1,247,O0O 1,359,000 1,459,000 1.574,000 1,574,000 1.81010" 1.810.000 17 to Next Years Dry Per"FunWn9 Ro4uinmente 318,000 329.000 350.000 306,000 416.000 418,000 6281000 629.000 IB 19 20%Center,.,Fee Well COP eervicel 127,000 131.000 142,400 164.200 1W,000 la).DOD 261.000 2fi1 600 18 20 Portion Of Insurance Re.Surialue or IDeficill OB2.000 760400 980a00 928,800 9B80DO BBB 000 928400 928400 20 21 USER FEE DATA 21 22 Sin&Femlly Nseid..Ueer Fe $100.00 $100.00 $102.50 $105.00 1107.50 1110.00 22 22.1 BAR Fee IF 92.93 Taxes Are Reled by Feem $100.00 $102.52 1104.97 1107.49 $109.96 22.1 22.2 SFR Fee From 2020 Melon Meoleelen $90 00 195.00 195.00 1100.00 11105.00 $130.00 22.2 23 Number of E4uivilent D"lln9 Unit. 5J40 0.940 7,140 7,440 ).)40 10,740 23 24 Fatimeted Goer Fee $074,000 0094.000 6732,000 $781.000 1e32.000 i1,101,400 24 CFI>_putt_M]m-sae N.1-Iqr] COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 Reviled 04I21/99 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 2 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002 5-Ynr Total 5-Ym]Teb1 LINE 1992-93 109394 1994.98 1995.96 1996-9) 1992.1987 19973002 1O.Yeer Total LINE 25 CAPITAL FUNDISI 25 26 Rat-of 6 Cer,y,nea From Use,Year 8454000 8568000 )47)000 8462000 6346000 8404000 4499000 9464.000 26 27 REVENUE 27 28 Construction Grenta 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 29 Feet: Cpnnanlen 470.000 470,000 741,000 ))7,000 1,068,000 3,546.000 11,215.000 14J51.000 29 30 Intandal Weele 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 31 War Fan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 32 Sale of Capacity RiOltte 81000 9.000 5,000 13,000 18.000 53.000 15.000 58.000 32 33 Annexe,lpn Feu 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 33 34 Ina araat 6 Mioeellamm—lmema 639.000 5901000 4M.000 420,000 349.000 2.471.000 1,709.000 4.180.000 34 35 Trainer Prppeeda nrem COP Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 35 OIM,Morse, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 37 TOTAL REVENUE 1.117000 1047000 1.241.000 1210000 1488000 60'M000 12939000 19008000 37 38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 10,681.000 8608000 8718000 7702,000 6,901000 18534.000 17438000 28473,000 38 39 EXPENDITURES 39 40 Sltaq of Join,Werke Trenment Plant 390.000 455.000 5301000 849,000 579,000 2,609.000 11I91.e00 3.800.000 40 41 Gnrin Cnllac0on System 458.000 473,000 490,000 507,000 623,000 2,449.000 3.211,000 6.600.000 41 42 OINar,Jt E4Wry 6 Din Capacity 1.1))000 1.200.000 1.200 000 1,200,000 1,200,000 5,977,000 6,000 000 11,977,000 42 43 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2.023,000 2.128.000 2.220.00) 2.350.000 2,302,000 11,035.000 10.402,000 21,437,000 43 44 Cpllal S Emironmentel Mp Hoene, 0,558,000 7,477,000 6.482.000 5.340.000 4,499,000 4.499.000 7.036.000 7.030,000 44 45 SMFe of 100,000.000 Capitol Reserve 6601000 680,000 660.000 860,000 550.000 650.000 650.000 0601000 45 48 SNere at 110.000.000 Eny0pn Reserve 65,000 BB 000 65,000 05,000 0 86.00 85,000 00 11,000 4S 65.0 4) Portion el Inauraie Rn,Surlln or 10allalll 7,643,000 6,762,000 5,777,000 4 831 000 3)64 NO 3)SI 000 8.321 000 5 321 000 47 48 Slnpla FemNy Mid..Cpnmatlpn Are $2,360 02.360 $2.470 12,590 $2,720 $3.490 46 49 NumSa on New EpuWelent DYnlllnp Ual. 200 200 300 300 400 900 49 50 Ea,imeme,Cennm,lpn Fee imam. 0470,000 1470.000 1741.000 1777.000 1110881000 $3.132,000 50 t,m.auw,T�.mM,NH, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.13 RWI.Od 04127193 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Paps 3 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002 5 Y..r Tend 5-Ymr Teel LINE 1992.93 1993-94 1994.95 19969E 1990.97 19921997 1997-2002 10-Year Talal LINE 51 BOND FUNDISI 61 52 Reservm 9 Carry-Over From teat Year O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 63 REVENUE 53 54 Tarr Lwy O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 54 55 Intarwt 3 Miscellaneous Income 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 55 56 Caner Income 0 0 0 0 56 57 TOTAL REVENUE O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 58 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 59 EXPENDTURES 59 BO Bond PareaN l 9 fivenoal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 91 Transfer t0 Capital Faallidas 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 9t 62 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 62 63 Resomes B Catty-Over to Neat Year 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 93 64 Next Ymr-o Div Parini Funding Requirements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Be 65 Fund Sean..or IDelclO 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 65 BB COP FUNDS 9B 67 Rxervas 9 Can,—.F nn Unit Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 60 REVENUE BB 09 New Sorrowing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 69 70 Willett 9 016er 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 TO TI Total Revenue 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O TI 72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 72 73 EXPENDITURES 73 74 Proleol Co.,Tnnalen la Cepltal Fecllilim Fund 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 75 Intermt Earned Transfam to Opereling Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 TB Co..61 I—n x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TB n Otnm O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 n 79 Total Eapendlmroe 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 TB 79 Ream m B Carry'owr 16 Naal Ymr 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 T9 BO Mqulred Debt Service Rmarne 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 90 01 Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 C rl aaergYtlM-p:N ton COUNTY SANITATION MSTNICT NO. 13 Beviw00012)I93 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Peed A FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 6Aan Total 5-Yar Total LINE 1992.93 1993-94 199495 1995-H 1996.97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-4rer To.l LINE 82 SUMMARY 02 83 Mnrva 8 Cerry-Ooar From Lou Year IO.478,000 9.885.000 8.724.000 7,851,000 81015,000 10,478.000 8.073.000 10,476.000 B] Bs Total Revenue 1.007000 1,025.000 2.O65.000 2.091000 2.395.000 10243.000 18,581000 20.790000 BO 05 Total Available Funding 12.303.000 11,510.000 10.709.000 9,902,000 9.210,000 20.719.000 24.620.000 39.268.000 05 86 Total Expenditures 2,656,000 2.)BB 000 2.9]8,000 3.12).000 3.1]).000 14.040.000 16.))4.000 30.020.000 Be B) Raerva 1.Noxt Yen 9 665,000 8,724,000 7.851,000 8.015 000 6.073.000 1 6.073.000 8.846.000 8,848,000 B) RESERVER ANALYSIS 00 Part Yeaia Dry Period Fwr6n9 Ite nanranb 318,000 329,000 358,000 388,000 4I8.000 418,000 629.000 629.000 Be 91 Continedncy Rnerva.20%el Opn Mont 127.000 131.600 142.400 156.20D 167.00D 107,000 251,B00 251.600 91 69 M5t Sur Rxerva land Food Belarro 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 89 90 Cepiul Boeervaa.SMre of B100,000.000 650.000 050.000 850.000 BSOAOD 850.000 650,000 6501000 050.000 90 92 Envi,..—nlal flag Bow.Slnu el 4110.000.000 WOOD 65.000 65.000 65,000 65.000 65.000 65.000 55.000 92 93 In.urance Feserv.. 8.525,000 7.540.400 9,837.000 5.659.800 4,))3000 I773000 7.M0.400 7.250,400 93 94 ApprepruteG Pasrva 9,805.000 8,726.000 7.851,000 O.B16,0p0 6.073.000 11A73.000 9.806.000 8.848,000 90 95 Unappropriated llaerva 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 90 Total Reserva 9 685,000 B 72/ODD 7,851,000 6 815,000 6.073 000 60)]000 0 8d0.000 roaroari8 0 e 000 96 DEBT SERVICE RATIOS 97 Senior Um OOvnaoe BgVAH IDIVpl FOIVADI 9OIVAR IONVgl IDIVNI 97 98 SuberErub Lion COueroq 05.00 42.69 69.32 40,10 50.71 130.81 9B 99 Additional Bond.Tal l Sr B Sub 1 35A9 05.00 42.96 49.95 48.43 I10.14 99 .pw wrm--ro:2e wJp r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.14 Rxis sd a27M3 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1 FISCAL YEAR91992-1903 THROUGH MI-2002 61 imtle6 5-Year Total S.F.Telal LINE 1 1893-94 199"s 1995-96 1996-97 92-198 1 -Y—T UNE 1 OPERATING FUND 1 2 Rwervro&Carry-Over Fmm Lost Yesr 474 COO 070,00085 000 940 000 9111000 476 WO 70,000 474 2 3 REVENUE 3 4 Sbre 81196 Tea A0ex8on 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 Fax:Ind.WW Wnto O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 5 6 Ueer Fax 1.600.00D 1,600,000 1.600.0W 1.600.000 1.600,000 e.000.0W 11.218.000 19.218.000 e ) Inlewt&NSe0allerwOw In. 41,000 54,000 64.000 66,000 59,000 264,000 VI1000 555,000 T 8 TTxeler Imm COP 1.& 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 8 8 Olmor A. 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 8 10 TOTAL REVENUE 164 64 1000 1654W0 18W0 1 666 000 1659000 B 2114,M OW 19773000 10 11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 2115000 2] 4000 518000 R606 WO 2575000 8756000 12251000 47,000 11 12 E%PENOITURE9 12 13 Sinsrs el Jint WsrBe III&0 834.000 1361.O00 847.OW 1.042.000 1,148.000 4.830.000 ),TW.OW 12.530,000 13 14 Colbe9an Sysxm M&0..4 OIMr Open. 449.000 446.000 404,O00 493,O00 502,000 2,341.000 2,830.O00 5.171.000 14 15 COP Ssrv . 185 85000 1650W 165 16800 85000 826.M 1,41,50,000 15 le TOTAL E%PENDITURES 1445000 14)2000 IS)B 000 1B900W 1013000 7998000 11355001) 19351000 IB 17 Rxervx&Carry-Owr to Nsot Yxr 87O,OW 852,000 940.000 91B4O00 7112.000 762,WO s88,000 896,W0 17 18 Nxt Ye.M1 Dry PxieO F—c in9 gsyuirorxnts O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 18 18 20%CeMing,Rx Wd COPesrviwl 258,000 261000 282000 305000 330000 000 48 000 492000 19 20 Pertien of In.. .»Res.Su,pWB or lOslltiO 414000 591,202 658000 Bll.ODO 432000 432,000 4 1,200 404000 20 21 USER FEE DATA a 22 Single FrtrBly Resilmce Lsssr Fee 90 90 FO W W F0 22 22.1 WR Fee It 100%Teaw Ane gvert" 221 22.2 SFR Fee Frem 2020 Vi itst Mealerplan 22.2 23 Number 01 E@rivalxt Dws%w Units 0 0 O 0 0 0 23 24 Eslintat"User Fax 00 80 60 FO FO 90 24 COUNTY BANRATION MSTNCT NO, 14 Romed 4127I93 STATEMFM OF PROJECTED CASH ROW page 2 FISCAL YMRS 1992-1993 THBWGH 2001-2002 S.YearTOlel S-Year Tons LINE 1992-93 1..3�94 199495 1995-98 1996.97 1992-1997 1997- 2 1DXeer Tiogl LINE 25 CAPITAL FUNDI51 25 26 8esomos 308npever From Last Year SASOOOO 8784000 611B000 70930 7,123000 5 00 72 5180000 26 27 REVENUE ]] 20 Coatruotien also. O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 29 29 F—: Connee is,n O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 29 30 Industrial Waste 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 30 31 Us.,Fees 8.000,000 0.400,000 10.200,000 51500.000 4.700.000 36,900,00p 0,500,000 45,300,000 31 32 Sale of Cepecly Rights 76.000 83,000 72.000 118.000 185,000 515.000 130,000 645.OD0 32 33 Amaaation Fen 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 33 34 Interest S Misalleaeue Income 424.000 481.000 491,000 504,000 509,000 2,409,000 2,588,000 5,008.000 34 35 Trereler Proved.from COP Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 36 Other Bwena O 0 0 O 0 0 36 37 TOTAL REVENUE 8 . a INFLOW 10783000 6123000 5374000 39724000 1128000 50953000 37 38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNNING 13.BW.000 16748000 17539000 13 6000 1249)01)0 44904000 10482000 58133000 36 39 E%PENDITUOES 39 40 Shso el Joint Wort.T..nt Plant 3.510,000 4,097.008 4,622.000 5.844,000 5.214.000 23.487.000 10.703,000 34.190,000 40 41 Might C011sctipn Systgm 1.500,000 4.875.000 5.634,000 239.000 50.000 12.298.000 250.000 12,540,000 41 42 On. 1886000 O O O O I Bag,got, 0 09800 42 43 TOTAL E%PENORUOES fi898000 997 10458000 6,083,000 5264000 37671000 10953000 48624000 43 44 Capital B Enin orunenul 9p 9sssrvn 8,704.000 6,776,000 7.093.000 7,123.000 7,233,000 7,233,000 7.509,000 7.509.000 44 45 Share of I M000,000 Capita 9n.— 5.840.000 6.040.000 5.040,000 5,840.000 5.840,000 5,,hio.o0 5,840.000 5.840.000 45 46 Shen 6f 910.000,OD0 E.,on Bnerve 684,000 5S4G00 584000 504000 2 84 884000 504000 6400. 46 47 Ponsin of lnurerce Rn.Surolu,er lMGat1 38000 36 659000 e88000 609000 809000 1OB5000 1085000 47 48 Snele family Neaidaa Cwow.e.n Fa $2,350 02.350 02.470 $2,590 02.720 03.400 48 49 Number 0f New E4uivWm Dwelling UrvN 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 SO Fa4meted Conneclion Fe6lrc.ms $0 $0 90 $0 90 O0 50 .rw,em�rp:ae wa-Ne.a COUNTY SANITATION DISMICT NO.14 R"wiml 4127M STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CAM FLOW Pepe 3 FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002 S.Yxr To,., 5-Yesr Tool LINE 8 8- > >. 0 Llxf 51 BCND FUND(S) 61 52 Rarorvn&Carry-der From Last Year 0 0 0 O 0 52 53 REVENUE 53 54 Tea Larry 0 0 0 54 55 Interest&Mlaoelleneox Worms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 59 Other 0 O O0 O 0 58 57 TOTAL REVENUE a 0 0 It 0 0 0 0 57 58 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 59 59 EXPENDITURES 59 80 Bend Prlrwlprl&Interest O 0 O 0 0 0 O O 80 at Trxrtrr to Capful Froode. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81 82 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 83 Fnervw&Corry-der Is Neat Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e3 54 Neat Yxi s Dry Period FundM9 Re4ulramenb 0 0 0 Q O 0 84 BS Fund Balance or Idllcitl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 88 COP FUNDS BB e> Reserves IS Deny—From Last Year 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 87 88 REVENUE 88 89 New Berrewin9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 70 Intern,to 01", 0 0 a 0 0 0 O 0 70 71 Total Reverwa 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 O 0 72 73 EXPENDITURES 73 74 Prelxt Cost Tordi to Capital Faeill0es Fund 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 74 75 Ideas,Earned Tionesta.to Deeming Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 78 Co..el Issuenes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 » 00wo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 78 Total EaxnNlurx 0 O 0 a 0 O 0 0 78 79 Reserves&Cerry<yn a Neat Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 90 W4ulred Debt Senlx Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 so 81 Fund Menx 8t CF l4 10ndl9 aI➢ai_10'.38 WPa,a COUNTY SANITATION DISTINCT NO.14 R-iesd 4127M3 STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pope 4 FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROIIOH MI-2002 5-YOOr Tool 5-Yxr Total LINE 19 4- 1990-97 99 - 99 997- 02 el LINE 02 SUMMARY 82 03 Rxervx A Derry-Outr From Lam Yeer 5,654,000 7.454.000 7.029,000 8,023,000 0.039,000 5.664.000 7.995,000 5.654.000 93 84 Total Revenue 1 141 12,427,000 7,789,000 7,033,000 41100B 000 22718,000 70,720,000 64 86 Tonal Auallable Funding 15,786,000 W072.000 20.055,000 16.812.000 16.072,000 63,062.000 30,713,000 78.380.000 09 00 Total Errpendlluas 8,341,000 10 444 0 ])]3 000 7,077,000 45,887,000 22,308,000 87 9)5 00 08 87 Rxervx 8 CarrytNnn to Nem Year 7454000 7620000 0023000 8039000 )995000 7995000 0405000 8405000 87 RESERVES ANALYSIS 88 Nam Yxi s Dry PerlOd Funding IleRuirwnents 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O BB 89 COntinBanoy A--.20%01 O,R00mt 256,000 261.000 282.000 305.000 330.000 330.000 492.000 492,000 se BO Coal Servix Rxerxa end Fund Sol4nx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 91 Capital Rxervx,Stairs of 4100.000,000 51840.000 6.840.000 5,840.000 5.840.OW 5.840,000 5,840,000 fi,840.000 6.840,000 91 82 Enuinnataud Rsg Ram.BM1ere o1110.000.001 504.000 584,000 584.000 584.000 684,000 564.000 584.000 684.000 92 93 Ixwexe Rxervx 74000 B43 OOo 1317000 131COW 1 41000 1241000 1469 1489000 83 94 Appropilsied Raearvx 7.454.000 7.628,000 6.023.000 8.039.000 7.996.000 7,995.000 S.4O5.000 8,405,(100 94 95 UrreppropJeNd Rxrvx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 80 Total Rxervx 7,454,000 7,628,000 B 0 3 O 0 0 95 000 )89S 0 0 B 005 405 000 BB DEBT SERVICE RATIO$ 97 Sanlor Lien COxuae B) 98 Subordinate Lion Courage 5.22 5.52 4.96 4.63 4.15 4.75 BB 99 Additbrwl Sends Test 1 Sr B Bub 1 5.96 5.22 6.52 4.95 4.63 5.85 99 PROVIDED TO FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE APRIL 22, 1993 BY DIRECTOR SWAN - BACKGROUND ON 1993 PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX SHIFT In 1993 It appears that Orange County will again be required to shift additional proceeds of the 1% property tax now being used to fund county, city, and special districts, to fund schools. This will have the effect of reducing the state's obligation to fund schools, thus reducing the state deficit. During 1992 this state-mandated shift pitted cities, the county, special districts, and the school districts against each other in fights to protect diminishing, but needed, funds. There appears to be several hems at play that make the shift situation In Orange County especially unfair: 1. When the legislature allocated the 1% property tax in 1978 after the passage of Prop. 13, It did so proportionally to how taxes were being collected prior to Prop. 13's passage. In Orange County's case this allocation resulted in close to 45% of the 1% being allocated to K-14 schools (the state provides the rest out of proceeds from Income taxes and other funds), with the remaining 55% being allocated to all other entities. This contrasts sharply with the statewide average of 35%to schools and 65%to fund all other levels of local government. Since 1978 Orange County has been penalized hundreds of millions of dollars, getting less than the average share of state funds for schools and committing less to local government than any other county in the state. 2. One would think that because of the disproportional contribution by Orange County residents to their local schools that these schools would be the best- funded, richest schools in the state. Not so. Due to an allocation process in the early 1970's after the Serrano Priest decision, 22 of the 29 K-14 districts (the vast majority) have become 'poor' districts; that is, the amount allocated per student is less than the state average per student. This resulted in a roughly $60 million shortfall to the Orange County schools during the 1990-91 school year versus the state average. So, not only are we paying disproportionally more for schools In Orange County, we are also allowed disproportionally less from the state to run them. This situation has become worse during the past several years as a consequence of our urbanization and growing foreign-born population. The 1992 and the proposed 1993 tax shift compound an already unacceptable situation for Orange County residents. In 1993, with another large budget deficit projected, the state is planning to shift even more of the 1% property tax to fund the state's obligation to schools and reduce state budget obligations. What happens to the schools? Do they benefit from this unfairness? No! The added taxes transferred to the schools are offset dollar for dollar by a reduction in state funding. In fact, the schools get less, because they are charged for the collection of these funds and have to pay higher fees - principally in the form of higher water, sewer, and other utility rates that are increased to offset the decrease in receipt of local property taxes caused by the shift. The proposed tax shift is a long-term solution to the short-term problem of a large state government deficit caused by an economic downturn. On the short term the State should focus on helping businesses succeed, by reducing taxation and eliminating regulation in order to Increase earnings, improve tax collection, and reduce social/welfare expenditures. Long term the State should commit to better balance the contributions being asked of the various counties to correct the gross inequities that currently exist. The State should commit to reallocate funds back to counties In a manner to equalize each county's contribution to schools from local property taxes. . . • . GANA Ili199 1IMMEN lik- mEMEMEMoll • • IMMIN 41 MEN 4r 7 3 t ( Fi � t e Y%a"•°`'ad,,tf3. r r r r �' r ej f ,� ^a2M'Ly�£�"t E I v F.�•i+ a7 - �y�r;pgfp v.,ys� �qr" r $ �S�j� SE•�.. 1 ®Ew q: q MM 1 11 • . : . : v • : • • 1 ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX LOSSES FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS IN ORANGE COUNTY 92-93 AV Est. 93-94 Total 92-94 District Tax Loss AV Tax Loss AV Tax Loss ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ East Orange County Water Dist. $215, 106 $399, 483 $614 , 589 E1 Toro Water District $223 , 906 $415, 825 $639, 731 Irvine Ranch Water District $118,525 $220, 118 $338, 643 Laguna Beach County Water Dist . $418, 000 $776, 286 $1 , 194 , 286 Los Alisos Water District $301, 397 $559, 737 $861 , 134 Moulton Niguel Water District $4 ,805,418 $8 , 924 , 348 $13 , 729, 766 Orange County Water District $2,749, 250 $5, 105,750 $7 , 855, 000 Santa Margarita Water District $505,935 $939, 594 $1', 445, 529 Santiago County Water District * $98, 000 $882, 000 $980, 000 South Coast Water District $753,000 $1 , 398,429 $2 , 151 , 429 Yorba Linda Water District $242, 000 $449, 429 $691, 429 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTALS $10, 430, 537 $20,070, 997 $30,501„ 534 * Santiago CWD lost 10% of total revenue in 92-93 budget's 35/10 test. GOVERNOR'S LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROPOSAL o $ 150 million from "enterprise" districts o $2.075 billion in general property taxes from cities, counties, special districts o $300 million from redevelopment agencies o $70 million one-time from counties Causes of 1993 . 94 Shortfalls 1992 - 93 Revenues 2.7 billion Shortfall from Predictions Due to Economv Automatic Repeal 15 billion of 1991 - 92 1/2 4 Sales Tax Reinstitution of .3 billion Suspended Business Tax Break (1991 - 92) Snack Tax Repeal .54 billion by Voters (Nov. '92) 3% Inflation in Some Costs, 2.46 billion Prop. 98 guarantees, other TOTAL 75 billion ` April 15, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS BI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA STAFF REPORT 10EAA EWB AVENUE OO.BOX 0127 v� DISTRICTS ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING FOUNTAIN M419A2-2411A82028-B12> mA�esx-zA++ SOURCE CONTROL FEES, ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES, AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES 1.0 SUMMARY Districts' staff is requesting guidance regarding potential revisions to the Ordinance Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Fees, and Miscellaneous Charges (Fee Ordinance). The fees and charges established by the Fee Ordinance pursuant to the February 7, 1992 Wastewater Discharge Regulations (WDR Ordinance) are intended to provide revenue to assist in the enforcement of the WDR Ordinance and recover costs of administering the Districts' Source Control Program, and certain costs of operation and maintenance of the Districts' sewerage system. Annual sewer use fees for direct industrial dischargers are charged pursuant to provisions contained in the WDR Ordinance. These include fees for wastewater discharge permits; fees for the treatment and disposal of trucked wastes; fees for the collection and processing of water consumption data and tax data; and fees for sampling non-compliant dischargers. An evaluation of the present fees and charges has shown that for a number of cases, revisions at this time may be appropriate to reflect the actual cost of providing . / services for which the fees are levied. This report provides background information for consideration of potential changes to the existing fees 2.0 BACKGROUND The Districts' Source Control Division periodically reviews fees and charges established in the Fee Ordinance as they relate to costs associated with the pretreatment program. Based on this review, the actual costs for the following fees and charges have changed in accordance with changes in sewerage system and administrative costs: ■ Fees for the issuance of Class I and Class II Permits; ■ Waste hauler charges; and ■ Non-compliance sampling fees and analytical charges. In addition, to insure that the full costs of the waste hauler program are recovered, two new fees should be considered for incorporation into the Districts' fee structure: ■ Charges for pre-arranged discharges to the Waste Hauler Station after regular operating hours; and J ■ Charges for emergency discharges to the Waste Hauler Station after regular operating hours. Fiscal Policy Staff Report April 15, 1993 Page 2 In each case, our options are as follows: A. Keep the fees at the same level - in this case, there would be no impact on permittees, but cost recovery would be transferred to other revenue sources/users. For some fees, this places an unfair burden on dischargers who subsidize costs related to discharge violations, permitting, monitoring & sampling, and other administrative actions. B. Adjust the fees according to the estimated cost increases - in this case costs would be directly recovered from the applicable users with some impacts for permittees. C. Adjust the fees to an interim level to be determined - in this case some of the direct costs would be recovered from the applicable users with an impact on permittees, while some costs would be transferred to other revenue sources/users. 3.0 PERMIT FEES Permit fees are intended to recover the administrative costs of issuing permits. These costs include processing and review of permit applications, facility inspections to verify manufacturing and pretreatment information provided in permit applications, producing and transmitting the permit, and maintenance of the permit data management system. Pursuant to revisions to the Federal pretreatment regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations 403.8), permits for Class I industrial users must contain statements of duration and non-transferability, effluent limits for all standards, self-monitoring, sampling, reporting, record keeping and notification requirements, and statements of applicable civil and criminal penalties for discharge violations. In accordance with these requirements, the Districts have revised the permit application and permit format for all Class I Users, which increased the administrative costs for issuance of permits from WO/year to $335/year. Revisions have also been made to Class If permits resulting in a cost increase of S33/year to S70/year. These fees are shown in Table 1. 4.0 WASTE HAULER PROGRAM The Districts operate a Waste Hauler Station at Plant No. I in Fountain Valley for the disposal of non-hazardous liquid wastes received by truck. Materials accepted include biodegradable wastes from non-industrial sources such as septic tanks, cesspools, chemical toilets, and grease traps. Non-hazardous industrial liquid waste is accepted only on a case-by-case basis pending certification that the waste is non-hazardous and meets the Districts' industrial discharge standards. Fiscal Policy Staff Report April 15, 1993 Page 3 Each waste hauler is issued a Districts permit and is given a Districts numbered registration decal for trucks which have been inspected and registered with the Orange County Health Care Agency. Currently the Districts have issued 60 permits to waste haulers for the disposal of non-industrial waste. Decals have been issued to 140-150 trucks operated by the waste haulers (the number varies as waste hauling companies add or retire trucks from their fleet). To recover costs for activities relating to the administration of the program and treatment of waste discharges, the Districts charge waste haulers disposal fees, permit fees and decal fees. 4.1 Waste Hauler Discharge Fees The Fee Ordinance currently includes a disposal charge of $0.02 per gallon of truck capacity for loads originating in-District and $0.04 per gallon for out-of-District loads. The out-of-District fee has heretofore been arbitrarily set at double the in-District fee. The fee is based on the maximum capacity of the truck because it is not feasible to measure the actual volume in each truck. The trucks range in size from 300 gallons to 5,000 gallons. Potential revisions to the waste hauler discharge fees are $0.035/gallon for waste originating within the Districts and $0.11/ gallon for waste originating outside of the Districts (see Table I). These changes reflect the costs of treating wastes, administering .../ a manifest program for hauled wastes, and recovering capital costs for wastes originating outside of the Districts as discussed below. 4.1.1 Treatment Costs A review of the charge for treating and disposing of septage and other hauled wastes as shown in the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Cost Allocation Study, James M. Montgomery, 1993 revealed that the present charge for use of$0.02 per gallon should be revised to $0.03' per gallon based on the volume and strength of wastes treated, and the Districts' annual operations and maintenance, and capital cost allocations. 4.1.2 Manifest Costs In addition, in accordance with Section 306.2.B of the Ordinance, a waste manifest, which documents the sources of all wastes to be discharged to the Waste Hauler Station, is being implemented for the first time in April 1993 to track discharges and enforce permit conditions. Similar systems have been implemented at other local agencies, and have been effective in tracking waste sources, and averting the discharge of hazardous wastes. As part of the manifest program, each truck coming into the Waste Hauler Station will provide a completed manifest form prior to entrance. The manifest will be examined to ensure that it is complete and legible, and that the waste loads are acceptable for ' Septage Is typically of much higher strength than domestic sewage. Organic loadings range from 30- 60 times greater. Fiscal Policy Staff Report April 15, 1993 Page 4 discharge. If any discrepancies are noted, the driver will be interviewed, and access will be denied until proper documentation is produced. Manifests will be verified on a random basis by confirmation with the generator of the wastes. This will be done by telephone or by inspecting the generator's facility. Based on the estimated number of manifests to be processed each year and the average yearly discharge of wastes at the Waste Hauler Disposal Station, the cost of administering the manifest program is $0.005 ('fi.c) per gallon. 4.1.3 Capital Recovery Charges - Waste Originating Out-of-District Capital funding by users in the Districts' service area is provided in part through annexation and connection fees. For waste brought to the Waste Hauler Station from outside of the Districts' service area, a portion of these capital recovery costs are captured through the $0.04/gallon discharge fee. A review of the avoided costs has shown that out-of-Districts wastes discharged at the Waste Hauler Disposal Station should be assessed a capital recovery charge of $0.075/gallon. This charge assumes that capital costs for an out-of-District single family home with a septic tank should be equivalent to the capital costs for a single family home connected to the Districts' sewerage system. Thus the charge is based on an equivalent annexation fee component and a connection fee component. 4.2 Waste Hauler Station Costs The Waste Hauler Station's hours of operation are Monday through Friday, 5:30 AM to 5:30 PM. To meet special and emergency discharge conditions, the Districts have developed procedures that allow waste haulers to discharge after regular operating hours; however, to insure that hazardous wastes are not discharged during these times, it is necessary to call in staff to sample, review manifests and identify waste loads. To recover the costs of operating and manning the Station at times other than the designated operating hours, two new charges should be considered as shown below: ■ An after hours charge of $85 per truck load for pre-arranged discharges, such as the disposal of chemical toilet wastes during festivals and sporting events; and ■ An after hours charge of $100 per truck load for emergency discharges, such as septic tank back-ups or restaurant grease trap overflows. 1 Fiscal Policy Staff Report April 15, 1993 Page 5 ..i 5.0 NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES 5.1 Violation Processing and Sampling Costs Non-compliance sampling fees have been established in the Fee Ordinance for the administrative, field, and analytical costs of re-sampling an industry found to be in violation of its discharge requirements based on sampling conducted by the Districts or by the industry. The fees are $200.00 for a minor violation' and $455.00 for a major violation' plus laboratory costs. A review of the administrative and sampling costs revealed that some adjustments should be made to reflect Districts' costs in processing these violations. These revised fees are shown in Table II. 5.2 Analytical Costs In conjunction with the non-compliance sampling fees, analytical costs have been established in the Fee Ordinance. A review of the Districts' analytical costs reveals that due to changes in procedures and equipment, there have been concomitant changes in analytical costs for 24 previously identified constituents. In addition, there are charges for 15 new constituents not previously listed. These have been added to account for regulations which would limit their discharge. These charges are itemized in Table II. ' A minor violation is any discharge that exceeds a permit limit by less than 20%; a pH discharge less than or equal to 5.0. but greater than 6.0; or a pH discharge greater than 12.0. 'A major violation is any discharge which exceeds a permit limit by more than 20%; or a pH discharge less than 5.0. r Fiscal Policy Staff Report April 15, 1993 Page 6 TABLE I SOURCE CONTROL FEES, ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES Proposed Charee Current Charge Permit Fees: A Class I Permit $335.00/yr $250.00/yr B. Class II Permit $70.00/yr $33.33/yr C. Class LII Permit No Change $75.00/3 yr D. Special Purpose Discharge No Change $250.00/yr Permit E. Waste Hauler Discharge No Change $75.00/yr Permit F. Transportable Treatment No Change $250.00/yr Unit Waste Hauler Fees: G. Permit Decal Initial Issue No Change $25.00 H. Permit Decal Replacement No Change $50.00 1. Entry Card Initial Issue No Change $50.00 J. Entry Card Replacement No Change $100.00 R. Charge for Use - Waste $0.035/gallon of $0.02/gallon of Originating Within District truck capacity truck capacity L. Charge for Use - Waste $0.11/gallon of $0.04/gallon of Originating Outside District truck capacity truck capacity M. After Hours Discharge - $85.00/load -- Prearranged N. After Hours Discharge - $100.00/load --- Emergency Administrative/Processing Fees: O. Districts Collection of Tax No Change $100.00/permit Data P. Districts Collection of Water No Change $100.00/permit Consumption Data Q. Appeal Hearing Filing Fee No Change $400.00 Fiscal Policy Staff Report April 15, 1993 Page 7 r./ TABLE 11 NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES Proposed Chary e Current Charee Cost of Processing and Sampling $225.00/event $200.00/event a Minor Violation Cost of Processing and Sampling $500.00/yr $455.00/yr a Major Violation Costs for Analyses: 1. Heavy Metals - this one $19.00 $16.00 price includes analysis for all the following: Cadmium Lead Chromium Silver Copper Zinc Nickel 2. Aluminum $19.00 --- 3. Antimony $19.00 --- 4. Arsenic $19.00 $16.00 .. 5. Gold $19.00 --- 6. Mercury $145.00 $130.00 7. Molybdenum $19.00 --- 8. Palladium $19.00 --- 9. Platinum $19.00 --- 10. Selenium $19.00 --- 11. Thallium $19.00 --- 12. 601/602 $152.00 $84.00 13. 604 $223.00 $153.00 14. 606 $254.00 $180.00 15. 608 $254.00 $193.00 16. 610 $37.00 --- 17. 612 $200.00 18. 624 $219.00 $225.00 19. 625 $445.00 $375.00 20. Ammonia Analysis as $26.00 $24.00 Nitrogen Fiscal Policy Staff Report April 15, 1993 Page 8 TABLE 11 CONTINUED NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES Pr000sed CharEe Current Charee 21. Biochemical Oxygen $29.00 $24.00 Demand 22. BOD and Suspended $36.00 $30.00 Solids Analysis 23. Chemical Oxygen Demand $14.00 $12.00 24. Conductivity $7.00 $6.00 25. Cyanide (Amenable) $67.00 $48.00 26. Cyanide (Total) $42.00 $30.00 27. Dissolved Mineral Solids $13.00 $12.00 28. Gamma Radiation $115.00 --- Determination 29. Gross Alpha and Beta $50.00 --- Determination `. 30. Tritium Determination $50.00 --- 31. Grease and Oil (Hexane $79.00 $73.00 Soluble Matter) 32. Grease and Oil (Mineral $79.00 $73.00 Partition) 33. Total Organic Nitrogen $26.00 $24.00 34. pH $7.00 $7.00 35. Phenol $55.00 $73.00 36. Suspended Solids (Total) $7.00 $6.00 37. Suspended Solids (Total $14.00 $12.00 and Volatile) 38. Total Dissolved Solids $9.00 -- 39. Total Sulfides $20.00 --- COUNTY SANRATION DISTRICT N ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA , April 7, 1993 PO eo G12�E iWMUN Va Y.MWOMu ez)zeblz a1n9A24411 STAFF REPORT Reauest for Consideration of Reduced Connection Fees for Park Stanton Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton The District has received the attached communications from Jan Development Co., and Director Sal Sapien, Chairman of Sanitation District No. 3, requesting consideration of a reduction in connection fees for a large Senior Citizen Apartment Project within the City of Stanton. The project includes 335 affordable senior citizen apartments located on Katella Avenue, just west of Beach Boulevard. Chairman Sapien points out that this is a much needed project to serve the senior population. The units range from 450 square feet to 750 square feet plus common areas. Under the Districts' ordinance, the connection fee would be $2,350 per unit or $787,250 for the project. The City of Stanton would receive five percent of this amount, $39,362.50, which is the standard provision for all cities for administering the District's connection fee ordinance. The District has two connection fee rates. The $2,350 residential development fee applies to dwelling units. Non-residential development is charged a fee of $470 per thousand square feet (minimum $2,350). The square footage area fees are used on industrial and commercial facilities which generally have lower sewage flows per thousand square feet than residential. Connection fees are collected to support the construction of the facilities necessary to serve new development. Those facilities include the large trunk sewers which collect sewage from the cities and convey it to the treatment plants, the treatment works, and facilities for the disposal of sewage treatment by-products and disposal of the treated effluent. The current connection fee of $2,350 per unit, which has not been raised for two years, is an important component of the Districts' overall financing program for capital expansion construction. The only other source of funds for facilities improvements is borrowing in the municipal securities market. The $2,350 per unit does not meet the Districts' capital needs; consequently, in recent years, the Districts have issued certificates of participation totaling nearly $400 million for additional funding of sewerage system improvements and replacements. The certificates are repaid by annual property taxes and user charges collected on the property tax bill. I Staff Report April 7, 1993 Page Two The issue of totally equitable connection fees is a difficult one with no easy answers. For example, one home may be occupied by a single occupant, while the next door house could have five occupants. It could be argued that the connection fees for the single occupant house, as well as the annual user fee, should be lower; however, the occupancy could change tomorrow. The same is true of a smaller apartment versus a larger apartment. Conversely, an argument can be made that the size of a dwelling is somewhat independent of the amount of flow received by the sewage system. Sewers must be designed and constructed for peak flows. Since these peak flows are somewhat independent of individual sewage discharge, an equal connection fee may be appropriate. The same is true of most of the components of the treatment and disposal facilities which again are designed and constructed for peak conditions. The cost of treating the sewage, however, is very dependent on the amount and strength of the sewage received. This cost is the operations and maintenance expenses, which are not funded through the capital connection fee charge. The operations and maintenance charges are funded largely through the annual user fee and that portion of the one-percent basic property tax levy received by the Districts. Smaller apartments pay less property tax and multiple family dwelling units pay a lower annual user fee than a single family dwelling. Some believe that a senior citizen, a low income senior citizen, or low income units in general should receive a lower connection fee. It may be that such a fee reduction is appropriate and, if the Directors concur, it is recommended that staff be directed to do a study and make recommendations. If a study is undertaken, it would be appropriate to consider certain guidelines. First, since the cities collect our connection fees, and retain a portion thereof, should a request for a fee adjustment be made by the governing board of the agency requesting the connection fee reduction? Should the agency requesting the reduction be required to give up an equivalent portion of the five percent collection fee which they now receive? Should the reduction request be considered on a case-by-case basis or should the entire connection fee schedule be restructed? If restructured, how many different categories should be considered? The Districts' connection fee for any residential project is one of many fees charged. If a request for a lower rate is going to be considered and/or approved, should it be conditional on all fees charged on that development by the agency agreeing to use the same reduction factor? Staff Report April 7, 1993 Page Three In summary, the issue of totally equitable capital connection fees, annual user fees, and most other fees is most difficult, at best. To the extent practicable, the Districts' fees are based on sound guidelines and principles as well as pragmatic considerations. Reduction in the collection of one fee will shift recovery of the loss to another fee and source. If cost shifting is appropriate, guidelines should be incorporated to ensure that fees for all services also share in the burden. Requests for fee adjustments are received periodically. To date none have been granted by the Boards. TMD:jt wwoc�cn-W wta,..,t Attachments (2) March 18, 1993 Wayne Sylvester, General Manages County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Re: Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartment Project Dear Mr. Sylvester. The purpose of this letter is seek consideration of a reduction of the connection fee structure for the above project. Park Stanton Place which will commence construction within 120 days, is designed as a 335 unit affordable Senior Citizen Apatmem Project, to be located on Karelia Avenue in the City of Stanton. The project will be of significant benefit to the City of Stanton, and the County of Orange as a whoie since it will provide much-needed housing for our growing Senior population. I00% of the units will be affordable, and 30 units will be reserved for very low income Seniors. The project will allow Stanton to comply with its obligations pursuant to the Regional Housing Needs Assessment as well as the housing goals in the General Plan. it appears to me that there should be some distinction made between normal residential dwelling units which are charged a connection fee of$2,350, and a Senior Project such as Park Stanton Place. 73 of the units are oniv 450 square feet, 238 units are only 550 square feet, and the remaining 28 units are a maximum of 750 square feet The size of the units, as well as the restriction of the units to occ.:pancy by Senior Citizens only would indicate to me that they are likely to have much less of an impact to the wastewater treatment facilities of the Districts than a single family dwelling unit. Accordingly, it would seem appropriate for the Districts to adopt a fee structure that accounts for these types of dwelling units. I am reaueseng that this maser be placed on the District No. 3 Board of Directors Meeting for April la. 1993. sincerely,- L Sal Sapien Chairman District No. 3 Sanitation Districts of Orange County J�JDEVELOPMENT CO . 8383 WILSHIRE BLVD.. SUITE 634. BEVERLY HILLS. CA 90211 12131 653 6677 March 17 , 1993 Mr. Wayne Sylvester General Manager Orange County Sanitation Department 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca. 92728-8127 RE: PARR STANTON SENIORS APARTMENTS 7622 KATELLA AVENUE STANTON, CA. Dear Mr. Sylvester: We are writing to request your consideration in re-classifying our project's designation to determine the appropriate Orange county Sanitation Departments Connection Fee. The project cannot afford the current inappropriate residential classification. The reason the proposed project requires this re-classification is because: (1) the project is loot Senior Citizen, which does not _ place such a burden on the sewer system, with no families or children present; (2) the project is a Low-Income project and cannot economically support a very high connection fee; (3) each unit is very small in size (approximately 500 square feet) and will not place the same burden as residential households on the sewer system; (4) the project is sorely needed in this community and is not feasible without your consideration. Please review whether a more appropriate designation might not be commercial or something other than residential, to more accurately reflect the nature of this particular project. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly y/ours,��, ./�YLLlJ(/ /<C I l Edward M. Czuker) Vice President EMC/cmw cc: File COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS el ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10e Ews AVENUE April 15, 1993 oo.9ox9,2] / Y FWMPIN VALLEY,CP2F9XNIP 92729-9127 pt<19622P11 STAFF REPORT PROPOSED PRIDE AWARDS During the past few months, several Personal Responsibility in Daily Effort (PRIDE) proposals have been evaluated. Following is a summary of those safety or cost-saving proposals that staff recommends for certificates and cash awards, in accordance with the Board-approved PRIDE program. Seven of these ten PRIDE proposals are estimated to save the Districts approximately $62,035 annually, while the other three are safety improvements. The ten recommended awards total $4,856.30. PRIDE No. 176 - Valve Stem View Port This proposal will extend the life of stem valves, stems and valve seats by creating a view port to aid an operator when opening and closing the valve to ensure it is not overtorqued. The proposed award for this suggestion is 10% of the first year's savings, or $873.60. PRIDE No. 226 - Jacking Tool This suggestion proposes designing a "Jacking Tool" to be attached to high rate mixing pumps to aid in deragging of the pumps, thereby providing greater safety for the worker and less damage to the pumps during maintenance. An award of $127.00, or 10% of the first year's savings is proposed. PRIDE No. 240 - Super Shredder Transoort Fixture This suggestion proposes a safer method for moving the shredder in order to perform maintenance on it by fabricating a fixture or rack for this purpose. The suggestion improves safety and the proposed award is $100. .J i, Proposed PRIDE Awards Page 2 April 15, 1993 PRIDE No. 242 - High Temp Oven Cleaning Using a high temperature oven to clean laboratory glassware results in more effective, efficient and economical cleaning and eliminates the release of all volatile solvents to the air. The first year's savings are estimated to be $14,000 and the cash award for this suggestion is $1,400.00 PRIDE No. 259 - Pump Packing Protection This suggestion recommends that sensors be placed on various plant process pumps which will shut down the pumps in the event of a loss of pressure or water. The proposal should have the result of less pump wear, and therefore maintenance, and the minimum of $100.00 is proposed for a cash award. PRIDE No. 264 - Reinformed Sludge Judge This suggestion increases the life span of a "Sludge Judge" at the Dissolved Air Floatation Units by modifying the couplings. This life extension results in an estimated $1 ,406.00 annual savings. The proposed cash award for this suggestion is $140.60. PRIDE No. 265 - Simple Activated Sludge Reactor Ventilation This suggestion recommends a procedural change that reduces labor and electrical costs associated with taking an Activated Sludge Reactor out of service. Using a smaller fan for ventilating through a high pressure relief valve results in an estimated annual savings of $1 ,787.00 over the current method. The cash award for this suggestion is 10% or $178.70. PRIDE No. 267 - Condensate U-Tube Drain Traps This proposal recommends installation of an automatic U-tube or water leg type piping system that would replace manually operated drain valves on the low pressure digester gas system for the purpose of draining water. This Proposed PRIDE Awards Page 3 April 15, 1993 change significantly reduces the labor that is required to perform the function manually with a very low material and installation cost. Staff estimates the first year's savings to be in excess of $30,000.00, and the maximum PRIDE award of $1,500.00 is proposed. PRIDE No. 268 - Grit Drain Flushing System This suggestion proposes a modification to the grit withdrawal drain lines at the Headworks because of numerous, costly problems with the lines becoming plugged. This recommendation has an estimated net annual savings of $3,364.00 with 10%, or $336.40, being recommended for a cash award. PRIDE No. 296 - Chemical Soill Isolation This suggestion recommends installation of hose winders with ropes and J flags to easily and quickly isolate an area that may be affected by a chemical spill. Staff proposes a $100.00 award for this safety suggestion. GGS:Ic REF:J:\WPDOC\FPC.MTG\PRIDE94.93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 108"ELLI9 AVENUE PO BOX 8127 FWMAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92729-8127 March 29, 1993 014)992-2411 STAFF REPORT 1993 SUMMER WORK PROGRAM For several years, the Directors have authorized a Summer Work Program for reducing the backlog of painting, groundskeeping and general clean-up work around the treatment plant facilities. Attached are listings of typical work assignments. This type of work can best be accomplished in the summer because the weather is suitable and the temporary help (mostly students) is more readily available during those months. Last year the Boards authorized a maximum of 37 Part-Time Assistant positions, working for a flat fee of $6.00 per hour. The total cost budgeted was not to exceed $250, 000.00, including labor, materials and supplies. This year we request authorization to hire a maximum of 38 people; and also request authorization for up to 8 temporary upgrades at a 5.5% salary rate increase for those existing full- time maintenance employees to be designated as temporary crew leaders, as in the past. It is proposed that the basic salary rate for the Part-Time Assistants be $6.00 per hour and the maximum expenditure for the entire program not exceed $225,000. 00, including labor, materials and supplies. Staff estimates that implementation of this project will save approximately $150,000 per year. Anticipated costs from May 24, 1993 through September 24, 1993, and crew assignments, are summarized as follows: Salaries & Wages $150,000.00 Materials & Supplies 75,000.00 Total $225,000.00 PLANT NO. 1 PLANT NO. 2 PUMP STATIONS TOTAL 1 Warehouse Helper 1 Warehouse Helper 10 Painters/2 Crews 15 Painters/3 Crews 25 Painters/5 Crews 4 Grounds /1 Crew 4 Grounds /1 Crew 8 Grounds /2 Crews 4 Helpers/l Crew 4 Helpers/ 1 Crew 15 Total 19 Total 4 Total 38 Total r 1 PLANT NO. 1 SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE GROUNDS CREW 1. Center of Plant a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 2 . North Side Tree Row on Ellis a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 3. Trees (Exit Road) a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 4 . West Tree Row (Ward) Factory 21 a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 5. East Tree Row (Next to River) a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. PLANT NO. 1 SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE TUNNEL PAINT AND CLEAN-UP CREWS 1. Diversion Structure a. Gate Stands b. Piping and Equipment 2. Plant Tunnels a. Clean b. Paint 3 . Sedimentation Basins a. Piping and Drive Motors b. Walkways C. Final Basin Piping, Pumps, etc. 4 . Aeration Basins a. Piping on Landing b. Exposed Tunnel Piping PUMP STATION SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE GROUND, PAINT AND CLEAN-UP CREW 1. Structures - Exterior a. Clean b. Paint, as necessary 2. Structures - Interior a. Clean b. Paint, as necessary 3 . Grounds a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds PLANT NO. 2 SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE GROUND CREWS 1. Tree Row - North End (Behind Nursery) a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 2 . Tree Row - West Side (Brookhurst) a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 3 . Tree Row - South End (Behind Warehouse and Sample Building) a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 4 . Tree Row - East Side (River Bed) a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 5. Sludge Bed Area and Truck Wash a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 6. Center of Plant (Basins, Digesters, Buildings, etc. ) a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds. 7 . Right-of-Way (To Adams) PLANT NO. 2 SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE TUNNEL PAINT AND CLEAN-UP CREWS 1. Oxygen Plant (Paint as Needed) a. Cold Boxes, LOX Tanks b. Piping and Equipment 2 . Reactor Basins and Final Basins (Paint as Needed) a. Mixers and Piping b. Piping, Pumps and Motors 3 . Sedimentation Basins (Paint as Needed) a. Pump Rooms b. Piping and Pumps 4 . Digesters (Paint) a. Piping b. Pump Rooms 5. Odor Control Equipment (Paint) a. Piping, Pumps, Motors 6. Buildings a. Clean b. Paint as Needed O. Tunnels a. Clean b. Paint Piping as Needed i AN OWNER-CONTROLLED WRAP-UP INSURANCE PROGRAM FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Presented By Robert F. Driver Associates April 7, 1993 [ t 1 1 1 I t 1 t ( ( L t 1 E ! l TABLE OF CONTENTS Page What is Wrap-Up Insurance? 3 Wrap-up: The Advantages 5 Expected Cost Savings 7 Wrap-up Insurance Companies 10 Management of a Successful Wrap-up Program 11 Public Entity Wrap-ups - In Process and Completed 16 First Steps to Forming a Wrap-up Program 18 APPENDICES • Advantages of Wrap-up Insurance Programs 20 • Common Objections and Responses 23 • Legislative Approval 27 0 § 4420 Unfair and Coercive Insurance Requirements 28 WHAT IS WRAP-UP INSURANCE? An "Owner-Controlled" Insurance Program is a centralized and coordinated insurance and loss prevention program that provides coverages for job-site construction risk for all participating parties. 3 WRAP-UP COVERAGES INCLUDE: • WORKERS' COMPENSATION • GENERAL LIABILITY • EXCESS LIABILITY • EXCESS AUTOMOBILE • PROJECT ERRORS AND OMISSIONS • DESIGN PROFESSIONALS ERRORS AND OMISSIONS 4 WRAP-UP ADVANTAGES • ASSURES PROTECTION OF OWNERS ASSETS • INSURANCE PREMIUM DIVIDENDS RETURNED TO OWNER • PROVIDES SUBSTANTIAL COST SAVINGS • IMPROVED PUBLIC RELATIONS • EFFICIENT CLAIMS HANDLING 5 I l - l I I l I [ [ 1 MORE ADVANTAGES • COORDINATED LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM • COORDINATED CLAIMS MANAGEMENT • MINIMIZATION OF INTER-CONTRACTOR (OR INTER-INSURANCE) LAWSUITS • EDUCATION AND TRAINING • IMPROVED OWNER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS • ELIMINATION OF DUPLICATE COVERAGES 6 t t f Q l t f 1 EXPECTED COST SAVINGS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Projected Insurance Costs * $80000,000 , Less Volume Purchase Discount (5%) ( 400,000)2 Less Contractor/Subcontractor Markups (12%) ( 960,000)3 Historical Water Treatment Plant Dividend (12.6%) (1,008,000)° Total Estimated Insurance Program Cost $5,632,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Insurance Cost Savings (30% of Projected Insurance Costs) $2,3689000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Estimated Wrap-up Premium $6,640,0005 * Based on $200,000,000 in project contracts 7 NOTES ON EXPECTED COST SAVINGS ' Projected Insurance Costs are estimated at 4% based on 3 year Capital Improvements budget of $200,000,000. Underwriters estimate insurance costs at between 3% to 5% of total contract value. Underwriters contacted for this information include Argonaut, CIGNA, Home and National Union. z Our experience indicates that volume purchase of insurance can provide insureds with a discount on overall premium. As evidenced by the recent implementation of the CSDOC Master Course of Construction Program, savings as high as 30% is possible. ' Contractor and subcontractors often markup insurance premiums by adding overhead or administrators changes. This information was provided by SVRDRUP of Irvine, a construction management firm with national experience. The Historical Water Treatment Plant dividend of 12.6% was provided by Argonaut Insurance Company. Their average dividend on all types of wrap-ups is 27.4%. CSDOC's actual wrap-up dividend may differ due to actual loss experience. 8 t t [ I t t t t ` t i @ t t t i k 1 5 Premiums will be paid on a project by project basis. Dividends are typically calculated at strategic points throughout the term of the contract with successive calculations continuing after the end of the policy term. Dividends can be negotiated as a reduction in premium paid at inception of the program. This estimate does not include a reduction. The Robert F. Driver Associates compensation is yet to be negotiated. Standard commissions on Wrap-up Programs are approximately 5.7%. It would not be reasonable for Driver to assume a commission level of 5.7% without consideration of a good portion of the funds being utilized for services necessary to support the administrative and engineering costs associated with a wrap-up. 9 t [ t t a [ t t t t t t t t t t [ WRAP—UP INSURANCE COMPANIES Insurance Company Best's Guide Rating California Status Argonaut Insurance A+, Superior; Class IX, Admitted Company Policyholders' Surplus of $250,000,000 to $500900%000 National Union Insurance A+ + , Superior; Class XV, Admitted Company Policyholders' Surplus of $2,000,000,000 or more Home Insurance Company A-, Excellent; Class XV, Admitted Policyholders' Surplus of $750,000,000 to $1,000,000,000 CIGNA Insurance Company A-, Excellent; Class XIV, Admitted Policyholders' Surplus of $1,500,000,000 to $2,000,000,000 10 e e [ t [ [ t t t ` t t t t e [ [ t l MANAGEMENT OF A SUCCESSFUL WRAP-UP PROGRAM Key assignments of responsibility for: • Insurance Broker • Risk Management Staff • Safety Management • Insurance Carriers 11 e e e e e e e f e e e e e e e e e INSURANCE BROKER RESPONSIBILITIES: • Underwriting and completion of data • Assist in development of project insurance manual • Attend all preconstruction meetings • Enroll new contractors/subcontractors • Issue policies and certificates • Monitor payroll reporting • Oversee claims administration • Coordinate and develop loss control programs • Provide assistance to Risk Management as needed 12 a t t I a t t t t t t t t a t t RISK MANAGEMENT STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES: • Creating annual project goals • Reviewing all requests for proposals, contracts, leases • Appraising contractor's insurance certificates for coverage not included in wrap-up • Periodically reviewing project blueprints to provide recommendations • Identify problem areas to designers, contractors engineers before and during construction • Produce reports to update and inform management of wrap-up program status, problems and completed goals 13 l SAFETY MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES: • All parties must be involved • Development of Safety Manual and Employee Handbook • Training for contractors and employees • Safety Inspections • Safety Reports 14 [ [ l 1 [ I I I I I I I I I 1 I I INSURANCE CARRIERS RESPONSIBILTTIES: • Background and familiarity with wrap-up insurance • Examination and underwriting of risk • On-site visits • Regular meetings with Robert F. Driver Associates and CSDOC • Loss prevention services • Claims services • Provide extensive support to Safety Management Program 15 I 1 1 1 ( l ( 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 t PUBLIC ENTITY WRAP-UPS Entity Project Status Atlanta (MARTA) Rapid Transit Completed Baltimore (MTA) Rapid Transit In Process City of Fresno Wastewater Treatment Seeking Legislative Approval Los Angeles County Transportation Commission Rapid Transit Completed Two In Process Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority Airport In Process County of Riverside Hospital Seeking Legislative Approval County of San Bernardino Hospital Seeking Legislative Approval 16 Entity PrQeec Status City of San Diego Wastewater Treatment Seeking Legislative Approval San Francisco (BART) Rapid Transit Completed Two In Process on Third 17 t t< [ [ [ [ t [ [ [ [ [ t [ [ [ [ FIRST STEPS TO FORMING A WRAP-UP 1. Management and Joint Boards Approval of Program and Concept 2. Legislative Authorization 18 APPENDICES ` 19 t [ t f f I t C 1 ( f & l E ( � ' l ADVANTAGES OF WRAP-UP INSURANCE PROGRAM There are significant advantages in instituting a wrap-up insurance program for large scale construction projects. Standardization of Contractor's Insurance. W tap-ups eliminate conflicting insurance provisions, remove overlapping policies and close coverage "gaps." Wrap-ups also provide the flexibility to write special coverages to meet specific needs of the owner. Obtaininr Hieher Limits. Contractors typically purchase $2 - $10 million in general liability coverage. These limits may not adequately pay for major accidents. Under an owner controlled insurance program an owner can purchase adequate limits to meet their perceived exposures without eliminating competitive bids. Specific Proiect Limitations. An owner need not worry about the contractor's policy being eroded by a major accident that happens while the contractor is working for another owner/project. ' Elimination of need to verify every policy provided by contractors. This process is usually performed through the customary exchange of insurance certificates and can be very time consuming. Eliminating this requirement keeps the project moving, the selection process is not delayed by insurance verification. Improved Construction Site Safety. Safety is the most important aspect of any wrap-up program. A pro-active, successful program requires everyone's participation and safety is no exception - it is everyone's responsibility. 20 fl I l [ I I [ t I t `" I I. t I Provide a coordinated aooroach to chums manaeement. A wrap-up program permits the use of one agency to provide all of the on-site claims administration. This simplifies the process and eliminates the conflicts which arise when multiple insurance carriers each share an insurable interest in one claim. A wrap-up eliminates this needless delay. Minimize infer-contractor lawsuits. Construction work can involve very hazardous activities such as blasting, demolition and excavation, inherent dangers that make any major construction project a natural and prolific breeding ground for litigation. Consolidating the insurance protection into one set of policies to cover all of the insureds helps eliminate the endless possibilities for cross-claims among the engineers, architects, contractors and subcontractors. Price A wrap-up program reduces cost in the following ways: Generates volume discounts. It is realistic to expect significant savings under a wrap-up approach through a reduction of administrative costs from multiple policies. Other projects have reported savings between 25 percent and 37 percent over the traditional approach of insurance placement. Offers ooaortunitles for dividends as a result of pod loss ¢Whence. Any dividends or return premiums due to good loss experience are returned to the owner versus the contractor; thus the owner's costs are reduced even further. 21 F,liminates contractor's mark-up on insurance premiums. The cost is reduced by direct purchase of the liability, workers' compensation and builder's risk policies rather than reimbursing the contractors through overhead expenses. Enhances cash flow. The reserve requirements under the workers' compensation insurance policies can be met by negotiating a letter of credit. This allows the organization to maximize its investment earnings. Public Relations Wrap-ups enhance public relations by the following ways: Expediting claim payment to injured Parties. The purchaser of the wrap-up insurance policies controls the insurance carrier, the claims adjusters and any other party with an insurable interest. If someone is not paid, the owner knows it and can control its image by managing the adjusting activities, especially with prompt claims payment. Encouraging/supporting minority business enterprises. Many minority or small contractors have difficulty purchasing all or part of the insurance required to bid on construction contracts. Wrap-ups eliminate the cost and unavailability of insurance as a "structural barrier." 22 fl l [ l [ [ fl [ I 1`` " [ [ [ [ I [ I C [ OBJECTIONS/RESPONSES TO INSTITUTING A WRAP-UP PROGRAM When you consider instituting a wrap-up insurance program, as with anything new, involved parties will invariably have objections or concerns. Some common objections and concerns are discussed below: Disruption of Contractor's Insurance. Contractors already provide workers' compensation covemee. Traditionally, contractors provide minimum or limited coverage for workers' compensation and employers' liability. By default, it is possible that the owner will become liable for any uninsured contractor. A wrap-up program provides adequate coverage for all insured parties. Contractors are currently Payine for their coveraee. A wrap-up does not require duplicate reporting or payment. The payroll hours from the wrap-up program are not reported to the contractor's primary insurance carrier and the premium for the program is paid by the owner. The contractors do not incur any additional cost. Chaneine the workers' compensation procedure is confusine. The contractors complain that their employees already know how to report injuries/accidents through their procedures. The wrap-up requires a new workers' compensation insurance carrier with different procedures, which can be confusing to their employees. In reality, each construction site still has the same rules: the employee reports the injury to a supervisor, gets a form from the on-site trailer, goes to the nearest treating facility and returns to work when released from treatment. From the worker's point of view, nothing has changed. The owner, however, has controlled the claim activity and the cost by standardizing where and how medical treatment is obtained. 23 l Administrative burden is too great. When the contract is issued to the prime contractor, that firm and each subcontractor has a set period of time (normally 2 weeks) to complete and return enrollment forms to the insurance administrator. During construction, the contractors may be required to complete other forms, such as monthly reports and claim forms, but these forms duplicate similar reporting required by the contractor's current insurer. Under a wrap-up program each contractor receives an "Insurance Manual" which contains instructions on completing all forms (see sample document, Appendix I). Contractors do not understand wrap-ups. This has an easy cure: early, frequent and complete communications. Once the contractors understand how the program benefits them, the objections disappear. Wrap-ups still require the contractors to maintain their own insurance. True. Even under a wrap-up, to protect the owner, every contractor must still provide certificates of insurance to ensure there is off-site coverage. There is no additional cost to the contractor under this requirement unless the exposure (such as automobile liability) is not provided under the wrap-up program. Then, and only then, the owner reimburses the contractor for the additional coverage related to the project based on a percentage of the verified premium. No one should cancel a policy; the contractors need their own insurance for other contracted work. Vague Savinz . Cost of insurance is buik into the contractor's overhead. It is hard to prove contractors have removed all of their insurance costs from their bid, but the bidding competition itself will eliminate the majority of the cost. The procurement process should require the contractor to bid with and without insurance costs as a line item. Expected figures can be compared to national standards; the cost range will be less for wrap-ups. 24 t I t l t I t I t t``' I t t I t I I ` ( l Difficaft to predict the Adare. What if the project doesn't continue, the plans change, the insurance carrier cancels the policy or is not there to write the insurance? People argue it is easier to change all of these events when the contractors are responsible for providing their own insurance. While it may be easier for the owner to follow the traditional approach where all of the work involved in obtaining the project insurance is transferred to the contractors, still the same events could happen regardless of the method employed to provide insurance. Insurance Market Commitment. Limited number of carriers willing to write wma-ups. There are specialty areas as in any field. The important point is the quality of the carriers. Those currently involved in wrap-up insurance are top-rated carriers. Insurance carrier could become insolvent. The contractors assume the same risk with their policies; however, if a carrier became insolvent the contractor might not have the resources to expeditiously find another qualified carrier. By operating a wrap-up, the owner already has information on other carriers willing to underwrite the exposure. Fear that an insurance carrier would cancel the araiect. Most contractors' insurance policies cover one year at a time. Wrap-up's, because they are project insurance, can be written for longer period of time such as three to five years. Also the policy can be a non-cancelable policy due to the volume and length of commitment. 25 e e t t t I t t e t e [ [ e I t t Administrative Burden. Increased requirement for meetings. gathering of data. It is true that this requirement imposes a burden, but it is a positive addition: Wrap-ups provide more control and more useful information than might otherwise be captured and thus contribute to the overall efficiency and success of the project. Demands on time. attention and resources. Any major project needs more personnel, paperwork, computers and space for the owner; with a wrap-up program, much of the work associated with the procurement of insurance is transferred from the contractors to the owner. However, arguably, the owner is not increasing work as much as substituting work involved with reviewing contractor's coverage and claim problems for control up front. Management e"erdse needed. One of the benefits of wrap-up programs is the transferability of documents and information. When one examines the documentation from several major wmp-ups that have been in effect during the past 15 years, one discovers that a given document has probably been duplicated, slightly modified and reused by other entities--over and over again. A start-up program can use the documents and procedures already developed at other projects. Alternative resources, such as the insurance brokers or carriers, also can be called on to help perform the administrative work. Disincentive for Loss Control Zack ofperforamce incentive. Critics claim that without penalties or claim deductibles, contractors do not have any incentive to operate safely. To counter this impression, it is necessary to reward the positive. A strong program with incentives can be created and supplemented by use of deductibles. 26 I [ I I l I I I I (' I I I I I I I , l C LEGISLATIVE APPROVAL Due to the existence of Government Code 4420, specifically Chapter 6 "Unfair and Coercive Insurance Requirements", it is necessary for public entities to obtain Legislative exception to Code 4420 to institute an Owner Controlled Insurance Program. The pertinent portion of Code 4420 is attached at the end of this section. You will note that there has been legislative exception made for three large mass transit projects in the state, namely, Bay Area Rapid Transit, Southern California Rapid Transit District and Santa Clara County. It is not necessary that your entity initiate specific separate legislation to accomplish a change in Code 4420, rather the change can be made by introducing a rider to a pending bill. We suggest the Districts General Counsel make contact with the local legislative representative who is sympathetic to the construction you plan and work with that legislator to add pertinent exception wording to a pending bill. Your legislative representative and General Counsel can provide input for specific wording, but the following is offered as a suggestion: "State Government Code 4420, Chapter 6 shall not apply to construction and/or renovation of any Wastewater Treatment projects for counties with a population over 200,000." The reasons for this exception can be laid out as you desire but primarily the reasons are: 1. Improved safety of the construction site 2. Improved control of insurance costs associated with the project, etc. This legislative approval should be addressed prior to completion of construction bid documents in order that design of insurance wording in the bid documents can be described and addressed properly. 27 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 `" 1 1 1 1 1 1 [ ` F 1 CHAPTER 6. UNFAIR AND COERCIVE INSURANCE REQUIROV M § 4420. Bids on public buildings or construction contracts; applicability of chapter; public agency, defined No officer or employee of this state, or of any public agency or of any public authority, and no person acting or purporting to act on behalf of any officer, employee, or public agency or authority, except a public agency or authority created pursuant to agreement or compact with another state, shall, with respect to any public building or construction contract which is about to be or which has been competitively bid, require the bidder to make application to, or furnish financial data to. or to obtain or procure any suM bond or contract of insurance §pacified in connection with the contract. or specified by any law, ordinance, or regulation, from, a particular surety or insurance com ag y. agent or broker. No officer or employee, or person, firm, or corporation acting or purporting to act on behalf of ally officer or employee, shall negotiate, make application for, obtain, or procure any such surety bond or contract of insurance (except contracts of insurance for builder's risk or owner's protective liability) which can be obtained or procured by the bidder, contractor, or subcontractor. This chapter shall not apply to any project under design or construction on August 4, 1967, by or on behalf of a public agency or authority if Ig agency or authority was then engaged in insurance activity with respect to the project that otherwise would be prohibited by this chapter. This chapter shall not apply to the construction of any exclusive public mass transit guideway project in any county with a population exceeding 6,000,000, or in the County of Santa Clara, or in the City and County of San Francisco. or any exclusive tmblic mass transit guideway prpject undertaken by the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit BARTI District. As used in this section, "public agency" means any city, county, city and county, district, municipal or public corporation, or any agency or instrumentality thereof. (Amended by Stats.1981, c. 481, p. 1824, § 1; Stats.1984, c. 141; § 1, eff. May 31 1984; Stats.1989, c. 99, § 1.) Historical Note 1984 Legislation Section 2 of Stats.1984, c. 141, provides: "The Legislature finds that due to the unique circumstances concerning the construction of a light rail system in the county of Santa Clara a general statute cannot be made applicable." Additions in text are indicated by underline. 28 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA April 21, 1993 tOIWI PD.eLLIS WX812pNllF "'✓ STAFF REPORT wuxrux vau14lg62-N" 9272e-9127 p 141998�8411 COUNTY OF ORANGE 800 MHz SYSTEM AND ITS IMPACT ON CSDOC TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM Summary The Districts benefit from the use of a two-way radio system that enables staff to communicate vital information necessary in the day-to-day operation of our two wastewater treatment plants and the collection systems, as well as help in the administration of the industrial source control program and the management of the master planned construction program. A recent inquiry by the Boards of Directors raised the issue of the new 800 MHz radio system being developed by the County of Orange. This report presents a detailed examination of the issues and presents staffs conclusions and recommendations to the Directors for their consideration. The report begins with a background summary of the history of the Districts' radio use and its present inventory and valuation. The discussion portion of the report clarifies the ./ issues involved regarding the 800 MHz radio system, covering pending rule changes from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), technical issues, public response and the response of special interest groups, and the status of the County's efforts to institute an 800 MHz system as a response to the FCC's changes. The discussion concludes with a summary of the features of the County's new system and its potential impact on the Districts. This report then concludes with staffs conclusions and recommendations. Background In 1970 the Districts obtained a license from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)to operate a two-way radio system in the Private Land Mobile Radio Services band according to Part 90 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Title R7, Telecommunications. This license provided the Districts permission to operate at 453.375 MHz (receive) and 458.375 MHz (transmit) in repeater mode with a call sign of KTC872. This radio system has enabled the Districts staff to benefit from the ability to communicate with operators at treatment structures throughout both plants, with inspectors in the field, as well as maintenance personnel at various locations throughout the Districts' far-reaching collection system. The radio units used include, a base station, mobile radios installed in cars, trucks, vans and other vehicles, portable hand-held units, and sub-base station 1 April 21, 1993 desk sets in certain administrative offices. In addition to the normal radio traffic, the staff also uses these frequencies for a voice paging system. This enables staff wearing these pagers to be paged anywhere within the Districts' service area. The present inventory of equipment includes the following: EXISTING DISTRICTS' TWO-WAY RADIO SYSTEM uantit Equipment Type Approx. Cost to Replabe Unit Total 125 Mobile radios $2,800 $350,000 150 Portable radios $1.500 $225,000 25 Desk sets $700 $ 17,500 2 Transmitter & Base stations $24.000 $ 48,000 (one spare) 1 Paging encoder & console $1,500 $ 1,500 2 Repeaters (one spare) $15,000 $30,000 2 Antenna (one spare) $1,000 $ 2,000 1 Recording monitor $6,944 $ 6944 300 Pagers $300 $90:000 TOTAL $770.944 The Districts' radio system has been in constant use for 23 years. The repeaters have been refurbished recently and the antenna was inspected last year. Radio units, over a period of time, wear out and require replacement. The March 1993 meeting agenda of the Joint Boards included a discussion about a proposed replacement of some units, as well as some new units for expanding needs, totalling 42 units at a cost of$38,383 plus tax. One of the issues raised at that time was the advisability of continuing to invest in this radio system in light of the movement to a county-wide 800 MHz radio system by many public agencies in Orange County. The balance of this report will present the status of the County's 800 MHz radio system, the reasons for this change, and the impact such a change will have for the Districts. 2 April 21, 1993 Discussion Following years of inquiry and discussion, on November 6, 1992 the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (PR Docket No. 92-235) in the matter of"Replacement of Part 90 by Part 88 to Revise the Private Land Mobile Radio Services and Modify the Policies Governing Them." This Rule was drafted to promote the more efficient use of the frequency bands below 512 MHz allocated to the private land mobile radio (PLMR) services, of which the Districts radio frequency is a part. The FCC document, over 430 pages in length, presents a large volume of technical details relating to the proposed changes. This report will only attempt to highlight the key elements of this rule as it relates to the County's efforts to develop an 800 MHz radio system and the impact on the Districts. Overview of PR Docket No. 92-235: There are four changes proposed by the FCC in this docket for the PLMR services: 1. Implementation of spectrum efficiency standards to increase the capacity, in terms of number of available channels, of several bands by 300 to 500 percent. These standards would generally reduce channel spacing from the present 16 KHz to 6.25 kHz or less. 2. Channel exclusivity option in the bands above 150 MHz. This would be accomplished using a market-based approach called "exclusive use overlay," which involves achieving exclusivity through concurrence of existing users. 3. Consolidation of the current 19 radio services provided by the FCC. 4. New technical and operational standards, such as: a. Significant reduction in permissible transmitting power levels which will permit more efficient geographic co-channel reuse. b. Centralized trunking. C. Set aside channels for specific operational characteristics. d. Designate channels for new high-technology type operation. e. Simplification of rules, in general. Reason for the FCC or000sal: In the past seven decades, PLMR has become the largest and most important area regulated by the FCC. The number of available channels within the PLMR service is rapidly dwindling and the competition for the remaining space is climbing. The FCC, following an inquiry made in July 1991, perceived an opportunity to expand the number �.J 3 April 21, 1993 of channels by "squeezing" more out of the existing bandwidth. All of the four previously mentioned changes covered in the FCC proposal hinge on this single point. The method of meeting this goal and Its Impact are the greatest source of debate within the community of radio users. The following section will illustrate the debate over this point. (It should be noted that this proposal is openly directed at increasing FCC revenues through the sale of the increased channels obtained as a result of these changes. In fact, the entire Docket No. 92-235 proposal was drafted by an economist (Dr. Doron Fertig, Ph.D.), not a technician. This has added fuel to the fire of debate over the technical soundness of the proposal's details.) Channel soacino: Present tolerances allow for a spacing of 8 kHz above and below each assigned frequency. The resulting total width is 16 kHz. The FCC, having received an outcry over the impact that their proposed change will make if instituted too quickly, proposes a two- step change. The first step would shrink the overall width to 12.5 kHz. The final step would shrink the width to 6.25 kHz. The rationale for making the change in two steps is that the first step (proposed for 1996) should sufficiently minimize the technical changes necessary for existing equipment to reduce obsolescence and enable users to continue to experience close to expected depreciation on their existing inventory of radio equipment before the final step is instituted. The final step would occur in 2004. In every instance, however, it is acknowledged that modifications will be necessary to radio equipment to enable it to work within this reduced bandwidth tolerance. Public Response to Docket No. 92-235: By the FCC's own admission, the public response to the proposed changes has been strident. The original NPRM when it was released on November 6, 1992 had a reply comment date of February 26, 1993. The volume of comments received has prompted the FCC to extend this date to May 28, 1993. In a telephone conversation with Dr. Fertig on March 30, 1993, he stated that the tenor of the comments received by the FCC is such that it is doubtful that the proposed changes will occur in exactly the same fashion as originally outlined and that the time frame may be altered somewhat. However, they are still committed to the goal of obtaining more channels. He also stated that the FCC is aware that many public agencies such as ours may be severely impacted by such a change, especially when available funds are so scarce. He stated that it is the goal of their proposal that changes required to existing equipment be kept in the $100 per unit range and that an upper limit of $300 per unit will be set to limit the financial burden to agencies. He did not have an answer to the question of whether or not a radio might be deemed too old by the manufacturer to upgrade and yet still too new to be normally considered fully depreciated and otherwise obsolete. Dr. Fertig concluded the interview 4 April 21, 1993 ... by stating that the FCC is limiting its responsibility to limit negative fiscal impact for changes to the PLMR service to 10 years. Based on the shrinking availability of channels, unless these changes are implemented by the year 2004, drastic changes will need to be imposed after that date, regardless of the costs to users. Associated Public-Safety Communication Officers Response: The PLMR service is composed of such a broad range of interests that special organizations were established long ago to act as a voice In representing the user community to the FCC. Since the Districts acquired their radio system, the staff has worked through the County of Orange's GSA Communications Division in almost all dealings with the FCC. The County Communication Division is a member of CPRA (California Public-Service Radio Association) which is the California chapter of APCO (Associated Public-Safety Communications Officers). APCO is the FCC-designated frequency coordinator for all police, fire and public safety agencies in the U.S. and Canada. Both APCO and CPRA have been active since the 1930's in representing the interests of their members in all dealings with the FCC. (As of this writing, Steve Hovey, the Districts Information Services Manager is obtaining his own membership with APCO and CPRA to enable the Districts to have a more direct voice in dealing with the FCC.) ./ APCO began work on its response when the FCC made its first inquiry in 1991 and APCO saw the direction that the PLMR service was heading. The technological features which the FCC is seeking to extend to the PLMR services already exist for the 800 MHz band. APCO perceived the FCC's push to the PLMR service users to adapt and change as an opportunity to recommend a better solution to its community of public safety-related organizations. The "better" solution involved the use of"trunking" radio frequencies and thereby enabling diverse agencies throughout a given geographic region, i.e., a county, to have the capability, when needed, to share a common channel or channels for coordination during emergencies. It was through the recommendation of APCO, and in particular its California chapter, CPRA, that the entire 800 MHz proposal was drafted for the County of Orange. In other words, the 800 MHz radio system is a local response to the FCC's proposed changes, not a direct mandate of the FCC. Status of the County's efforts and costs: The County was alerted by APCO in early 1990 regarding changes the FCC was considering but had not yet announced. Various cities and agencies in the County (including the Districts) were contacted by the County in the spring of 1990 to assess initial interest in the new 800 MHz band system. No firm commitment was sought at that time due to the lack of specifics regarding costs, etc. Since that time, specifications have 5 April 21, 1993 \ been drawn up and proposals from various vendors have been solicited. At this point in time, the negotiations have narrowed down to two vendors. Original proposals were received February 3, 1992. Extensive analysis of the competing proposals revealed that costs were significantly higher than projected and the technical problems more significant than expected. In fact, the technical problems posed by each proposer were such that neither would be able to receive a license from the FCC. The present status of the project is that an evaluation process is underway to determine the adherence of each proposal's technical content to the corresponding specifications outlined in the RFP. It is anticipated that within the next two months the County Selection Committee will be able to obtain authority to negotiate a contract with a single recommended vendor. There are many hurdles which this project faces that were not anticipated when originally envisioned three to four years ago. One of the biggest problems is funding. The county backbone system was originally projected to cost$41 million. The cost estimates are now up to$49 million and climbing. Bond financing was originally envisioned, but that solution now looks as if it may end up costing at least $61 million. All of the cities and agencies originally contacted have the same question regarding the costs. Unfortunately, until the selection process is completed and authority granted to negotiate with a single vendor, no one is at liberty to divulge projected costs. The downside of this situation is that until agencies can determine individual costs, no commitment of participation can be obtained from organizations like ours. It is expected that this selection process and subsequent granting of authorization will be completed this summer. At that time the Districts and all other agencies and services, both city, county and otherwise, will be polled for their interest and commitment in participating. During this survey, more detail will be available to enable each organization to determine what their projected costs would be. It was assumed from the start that the cost of the county's backbone system would be shared by its participants. The impetus for those joining the new system was to obtain more subscribers so that the overall cost to all would be minimized. However, two new issues have entered into the picture: The first issue is a technical one — some radio engineers are beginning to question the theoretical limits of the proposed system. The essential question is whether this system will be "oversubscribed" and become so crowded by traffic as to become virtually unworkable. It is generally agreed that there may be a limit to how many users this system will bear. There is no plan as to what can be done to overcome the practical limit when it is reached. This concern is especially felt by the Districts' staff as the Districts' two-way radio system requires relatively high traffic volume because of the nature of the communications needed to continuously operate our two expansive treatment plants, when compared to other public service agencies. The second issue which has recently been raised is the method of cost sharing. In 6 April 21, 1993 today's fiscal reality, one-time cost recovery Is being perceived as possibly not as valuable as an on-going revenue source. The possibility has been raised that the County may elect to absorb the entire cost of the backbone system and institute an annual "user fee" for all participants. The answer as to how the cost will be shared is still unknown and awaits the County's decision. Basic features of the proposed 800 MHz radio system: The basic concept of the new 800 MHz radio system is closely paralleled by the cellular telephone network. No one agency or organization will lay claim to a particular radio frequency. A range of frequencies will be "trunked" in a fashion similar to the way a telephone PBX system works. Modern micro-electronics will enable the creation of"talk groups" and "subgroups". This means that the Districts will use the radio system exactly as we do now. Vector Control and Animal Control, police, fire, etc., will also use the same radio system but will be on separate "talk groups". As a result, only Districts' staff will hear Districts' staff and vice versa. The other agencies will only hear their own traffic, as well. (There is no theoretical limit to the size of a talk group.) "Subgroups", if we chose to implement, would enable us to segregate on-air traffic further to subgroups within the Districts, such as Source Control Inspectors, vs Operations staff, etc. When necessary, the new radios will also be able to function in "simplex" mode (direct radio-to- radio communication), which the Districts can already do with its 453 MHz radios. The new system would provide significant improvements in the range of coverage due to the installation of mountain-top repeaters. This would be part of the over-all cost of the County backbone system. Another advantage of the new system would be redundancy. The County would be carpeted with repeater "cells" in such a way that if one went "down", the surrounding cells would automatically take up the slack so that no degradation of signal would occur. In an emergency, it would be less likely that there would be a "single point of failure" as there is now with the Districts' single tower (although there is a spare antenna, transmitter and repeater in storage). The new radio system would also provide the Districts with a built-in mutual aid channel to enable staff to coordinate with other services and agencies In times of emergencies such as earthquake, toxic spills, etc. Impact on the Districts: There are some details concerning the impact that the new 800 MHz radio system will have on the Districts which are known at this point in time: 1. Reouires forfeiture of existing 453 MHz System. Adoption of the new system will require us to relinquish our present 453 MHz radio frequency license. In other 7 April 21, 1993 -- words, we would not be able to adopt the new system keep the old one as well. (If the Districts do not adopt the new system, we will retain the 453 MHz radio system but it may have it's own limited life span of cost effectiveness by the year 2004 due to possible expensive modifications to our system mandated by the FCC proposed changes.) 2. Current equipment would be obsolete. All radios and pagers which the Districts now own would be obsolete if the Districts adopt the new 800 MHz system. In addition, it is not technically possible to modify any of our present radios to utilize the new 800 MHz system. Therefore, all of our present radios and pagers would become surplus. 3. Cost estimates. Projections of a "per radio" cost were $2500 for mobile radios, $1,500 for portables, $600 for desk sets and $7000 for base stations (the true costs may end up being much more). Our present inventory consists of 125 mobile radios, 150 portable radios, 25 desk sets and 2 base stations. The costs would be nearly the same as if the Districts were replacing its present inventory: $680,944 (plus pagers). This price would not include replacing our voice pagers, as mentioned below. Other administrative equipment would also be needed but no projection of costs is available. In addition, considerable costs would be required for communications consulting, installation, coordination, and licensing. 4. New 800 MHz System will not accommodate voice paging. Voice paging will not be available with the new system. The Districts' 300 voice pagers would become surplus. Voice paging will not be possible with any of the options available. Paging will be limited to either a beeper or an alphanumeric display pager. The Districts' service options for paging will be limited to: a. Contracting with the County for use of its current 900 MHz paging system. There is a cost for this "service" and would only be slightly less than the next choice. b. Contract with a private paging firm for paging service. Either solution will be less flexible than our present method of paging. Many plant phones are currently restricted to prevent unauthorized telephone calls out of the plant. However, the Districts' present PBX and paging system allow calls on any phone in the plant to access the paging system. Either of the two options above would require an "outside" call in order to page someone inside the plant. This outside call would not be possible with our currently restricted phones. This would also increase PBX traffic on the Districts' outbound trunks, limiting their availability. 5. 800 MHz System will not be available for two to three years. Assuming a County contract is signed with the selected vendor by mid to late 1993, it will be at least two more years before the County of Orange will have its backbone system 8 `a,d 1 April 21, 1993 complete. If a decision was made for the Districts to join this new system, the Districts would not be able to begin work on our portion of the 800 MHz system until mid to late 1995, following the completion of the County's backbone system. Consequently, the present 453 MHz system will need to continue to be maintained for a minimum of two to three years regardless of whether or not the Districts elect to join the new 800 MHz system. Conclusions It is obvious to staff that, based on the Input received from the FCC, APCO and Orange County Communications Division, our present 453 MHz frequency radio system will approach the end of its effective use over the next 10 years. It is also apparent that if the Districts continue to use the 453 MHz system, we will be required to pay for modifications to our existing equipment at some point during the next 10 years. The exact dates that these costs will occur and the exact amounts are still undetermined. Our view of the County's proposed 800 MHz radio system Is as follows: Positive: 1. New technology providing frequency trunking, greater coverage and talk-group capabilities which are not possible now at the 453 MHz frequency. 2. Mutual Aid channel capability for emergency use. Negative: 1. New technology is untested and unproven. Districts' day-to-day need for radio communication to assist in operations precludes experimenting with new technology and risking communication disruption. 2. Mutual Aid channel only available through use of County backbone system. This system is not fully designed yet. A minimum of two years will be required to build and lest the system. 3. Costs for new system backbone are completely unknown. Method of cost recovery is undetermined. Cost of replacing existing radio equipment will be significant. 4. The new system may be undersized and oversubscribed. The Districts may discover (too late) that the traffic load on the system will severely limit its usefulness. r 9 April 21, 1993 Recommendation Because of the many unknowns at this stage pertaining to the new County-wide system implementation and their affect on the potentially significant impacts on the Districts two- way radio communication needs, staff has concluded that there is insufficient information to enable a knowledgeable determination on participation of the new 800 MHz system at this time. Staff, therefore, recommends the following actions: 1. Continue to monitor the progress and development of the proposed new County-wide 800 MHz Radio System, and upon receipt of additional information, assess the advisability of the Districts participation in the system and report back to the Boards; and, for the interim continue to maintain the Districts' existing 453 MHz Two-Way Radio System in a state of readiness and repair to meet the Districts day-to-day and emergency radio communications needs. 2. Approve purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment(Specification No. E-227) from Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc., in the amount of $38,383.00 plus sales tax. (This is the action that was deferred by the Boards at the regular March 10, 1993 meeting pending a report on the 800 MHz Radio System.) 10 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS RE: AGENDA ITEM NO, 13 AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 108a ELLIS AVENUE PO BOM"'a' FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92928.8127 OIA1SE2-0Atl April 27, 1993 REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: APRIL 27. 1993 - 11:30 AM COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Pr n : John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager John J. Collins Charles Egigian Nichols, Conservation, Recycle Burnie Dunlap and Reuse Manager James M. Ferryman Ed Torres, Air Quality Manager Frank Laszlo William D. Mahoney Maria Moreno Henry W. Wedaa Absent: OTHERS PRESENT: �.Ai Victor Leipzig Betty Mrgudich, General Counsel's Office Ted R. Moreno La Ronda Bowen, Public Advisor, SCAQMD Carrey J. Nelson David Rutherford, Public Information Specialist, Glenn Parker SCAQMD Iry Pickler Leslie A Pontious Robert Richardson Phil Sansone Sal Sapien Peer Swan AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT ISSUES The Committee met at the Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) headquarters in Diamond Bar. The SCAQMD staff reported on the full range of programs and management of the district. The Committee toured the SCAQMD facilities including the laboratory and the on-site fuel cell equipment. The fuel cell is identical to the equipment being contemplated for installation by the Sanitation Districts. CEN:gc Ref #330157.rp ✓ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS St ORANGE COUNTY, CAUEORNPA F 1pPC ELLIBOX AVENUE2A.BOX 0127 fOUNLIN VRLIFv,GLIfOPN1182]2B91BJ f]tn B82Y.tt RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS MAY 12, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKIN6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/93 PAGE I V REPORT NUMBER AP 9] C 4 SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS D _ .. _ .. ._. .. CLAIMS PA10 04/07/93 POSTING GATE 09/07/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMDUNT DESCRIPTION 128927 A6 TECH CUMPANV $69.328.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.O.10-9-91 12892E AGA CORPORATION $1.674.98 GAUOB 128929 AM BEST COMPANY $90.00 BOOKS 128930 A 7 a 1 f3.831.6b LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 229931 AMERICAN TELEPHONE a TELEGRAPH $1.21401 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES _-_- 228932 A T a 7 i165.77 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 228933 ACLU-LABS RESEARCH INC 450.60 1" SERVICES y 12893E ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP }3y.188r04 ENGIN66R3NG SBEVICEE. M.O.11-18-92 m 128935 AIR ACCESSORIES CO $55.96 FILTER Z 128936 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC SIB0.66 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS C 120937 AIR PRODUCTS a CHEMICAL . IN $603.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLT98. . y 12093E ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $27.19 ASPHALT 128939 AMEN SOCIETY FOR HICRDBIOLG 1452.40 PUBLICATION ^-' 12894C AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTN _ . _. $436. 4 LAB SUPPLIES m 128941 AMICON, INC 1929.46 LAB SUPPLIES- - - -- - _ 3 128942 AMAESCO. INC 497.86 LAB BUPPLI68 128943 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION .. . %23.643.00 SEWER REPAIR -DIET SR6 -It 128944 ANDATACO $645.71 _-_ LAB SUPPLIES - - 128945 BLAME P ANDERSON 67J.85 CBLLUIJIR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 1 120946 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL 6230.00 _ SERVICE AGREEMENT 128947 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 1972.9E NOTICES 6 ADS _ - . . >D 12894E APPLIED DATA ENS INC 4164.10 LAB SUPPLIES 128949 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING ;2.101.3i _ _ _ PAYROLL SERVICES ____ _ __ 126950 ORFIKK PORTABLE IL SERVICES 393.64 PORTABLE REETROOM _ - ty 128952 BAM LANDFILL 33r793r64 RESIDUALS REMOVAL N.O.10-9-91 N 12895E BATTERY SPECIALTIES _- . - ATRBRIE 129953 BA%TCR DIAGNOSTICS INC LAB SUPPLIES 120954 ROBERT VEIN WILLIAM FROST $2,442.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-33 128955 BELL SECURITY _ _. _ _6915.0k TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES C7 128956 VT DILLARD INC 1616.97 — - MECHANICAL REPAIRS - - ---- '- - N 128957 BIOMERIEU% TITER INC 140.E29.1b AB EQEIPME BMBNT 12695E 810 TECH NE7. INC . .. $27.51 -128959 BON-A-RUES f305.al TRUCE 'PARTS 12896C BOVLE ENGINEERINb CORP $49.101.18 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-7-1 128961 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC _ __1918.20.. _ ELECTRIC PARTS -- ENGINEERING-SERVICES-PI=]T 12896E BROWN a CALDWEJANITORIAL CONSULTING $1,650.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 128963 BUDGET JANITORIAL fir 250.00 TRAINING VIDEO 126965 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE __. . ...._ ;15r92. _ ..—_.VALVES. _.. ._ _.__.. ......_..__. ...__ -. __ ._...._.__._... 120965 GANMC ENGINEERING CO S510,904.41 03 128967 GART G STN EEO f2.904.83 PETTY UBLI CASH RBIMBVRBBMENT 128968 CRC PRESS INC "49.45 PUBLICATION 12F968 CS COMPANY $782.16 _ . ..—VALVE PARTS___._ 12E970 CALIFORNIA AU IOMA TIC GATE 1181.1E SERVICE AGREEMENT 128971 CAV S CAMERAS AEU VIDEO1NEEK .237.49_ CAMERA REPAIRS 328911 JOhN CAP OLLO ENGINEERS t29r2]7r 71 � ENGIN88RING SERVICES P2-36; Pt-34 128972 CENTURY PAINT $215.32 PAINT BUPPLI68 V✓ ri N FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YVRMIN4 CAPITAL PPUOESS ING GATE 3/71/93 YA4E < REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAN6E COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/07/93 POSTING GATE 49/47/93 WARRANT NO. VLN04R AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 128973 CtNTUAY SAFETY INST L SUIY /19.b60.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128974 SOUTHERN CAL MATLRLAL HANULINU 56.878.23 STORAGE UNIT 128975 COLICM AND SONS $1.774,936.40 CONSTRUCTION I-9 128976 COLLEGE PLACEMENT COUNCIL *237.05 SUBSCRIPTION 128977 COMPRESSOR COMFONENTS OF CA 22.605.OT FITTINGS 126978 COMPUSA. INC. 665.38 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 128979 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIV $16.37 TRUCK PARTS n 12898C CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 46,735.27 ELECTRIC PARTS On TOOLS 12P981 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $1.200.52 f7l 2 12896 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 91.616.25 CHLORINS M.0.10-9-91 C 128983 COSTAR INDUSTRIES USTRIES INC i1.198.O6 INSTRUMENT PARTS Da 128985 STATER CARP ,255.47 LAB SUPPLIES ' 128985 STATE BOARD OF E0UIL12Ai10N f295.A7 UNDERGROUND NHL BTORAO6 P669 --i 128997 DAPPER TIRE - 451h.51 TIRES GLASS ITl 128988 DE GUE LLE f SUNS GLASS CO f167.eB LAB S 3 128989 DELTA FOAM YXUDVC7S f169.57 LAB SUPPLIES # 126990 DELTRON INC i169.84 INLTHVMHNT PARTS _ l0 128991 DE2URIN ANDIORENVIRONMENTAL CS CO 93,867.75 ANIONIC 128992 DIATEC EN YIASSOCIATE $1.293.60 ANIONIC POLYMBA M.O.0-12-92 128992 DIGITALPO ASSOCIATES $1.154.30 PRINTING 128997 DIGITAL ENTERPRISES CORP $3,393.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE R r 128995 DUNNDT WARERYR ESES INCIbC i3.393.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE i REPAIRS r 128995 OVNN COYAROS CORP i314.L3 _ FAINT SUPPLIES Ly NGS 121996 D�VALS SALES i1]2.96 INSFITTRUMENT 126997 EIM CO/Ntlt SUPPLY f4.,93.8A INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES �--. ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-46 N 12899E EnA SERVICES INC i2$192.11 LAD SUPPLIER " ' " 129000 E S S $715.11 � 129001 EAGLE NIS TRIBUTIxU 3715.10 SAFETY BUPPLI68 129002 ELSTMRN INC t6$915.08_ _ OFFICE BUPPLIES RV _. ..ELECTRICAL SERVICES 129002 ELECTRO-TEST INC .542.04 N 129004 ENCHANO DYNAMIC StRY10ES iJ.592.0U PROFESSIONAL 86RVIC68 129009 ENCHANTER ER INC i3A920.00 ... DCBAN MONITORING HDRAWA 0-92 129005 JOSEFN EVANS f2.500.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHmMWAL 129006 CHARLES EVANS 6 ASSOC. $59.201.00 CONSULTING 86RVIC68 - LAB L29007 FALCON DISPOSAL SLRVICE f3.900.40_ RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 12900E FEDERAL ERF PE55 CORP 1368.10 . . _. AIR FREIGHT_—. . 129009 FISCHEROAS F68.10 PROPANE 129011 FISHNET L SCIENTIFIC CO -, fy$294.81 CHLLAB SUPPLIES PARTS 129011 FISHER SCIE Ni If IC CO 329 A.81 LAB BUPPLIBB _....- 129012 FISONS INSTRUMENTS i13.54 LAB BUPPLI68 129013 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. f29fi.O4.- CONCRETE CUTTING _. - - 129C19 FLU-SYSTEMS f3.129.0E PUMP PARTS 1291 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $61.03 FILM 129016 THL FNRBVR0 CO . 0 .4b INSTRU MENT SUPPL IES 129017 GET. INC. $244.96 OFPICE eOPPLIHE 129F18 GANANL LUMBER CO $865.22 LUMBER/HARDARE ri t � � W FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3131/93 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP13 CUUNTVCLAI SANITATION 04/ 7/93DISTRICTS Of ORATES COUNTY .. CLAIMS PAID 09/0%/9! POSTING DATE 01/07/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR ANUUNT DESCRIPTION 129019 6ARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY 36.917.78 CHEMICALS 129520 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. s1.297.4k INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129021 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $170.24 TELEPHONE SERVICES - 129022 BIENLICh-MIICHELL INC $1.567.52 PUMP PARTS 129023 N GLANTI 6 SON $565.75 BUILDING MATERIALS 129G24 DON GREEK T ASSOCIATES 41,755.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 " 129025 HB TYPE 6 GRAPHICS $1.992.79 PAINTING a 129026 MACH COMPANY $325.22 CAN SUPPLIES G� 129027 PL HAWN CO INC $207.03 FILTERS ' r1l 12902E HELLO 4252.10 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT Z 129C29 HOERBIGLR CVS CALIF INC s211.31 COMPRESSOR PARTS C7 189030 RC ROFFMAN ANU/OR 1SCO S9J9.45 LAB SUPPLIES - n PAINT SUPPLIES 129031 PS HUGHES CO INC f76A.0G OFFICE SUPPLIES 129033 HUNTINGTON VALLEY RSCHWI STA Sir$77•44 f l INSTRUMENTATION PARTS -' 129077 HUNTING TON VALLEY SCHY7NN L iT 1.19 g 129031 ISC 56.214.43 IERRIC CHLORIDE SERVN.D. CES 11- 129675 IMPERIAL PEST CHEMICAL i88.321.29 _ FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O. 11-18-92 � 129636 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PpUUVtTS il•913.23 CONNECTORS 129038 ING ANFARTEET s25.00 OFFGHT ICE P 12903E INAR AM PAPER $7$145.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129040 JLA CREDIT WEST N S $434.16 HICROFJANITORIAL SUPPLE LEASE n 129041 GREAT CATCHING SANITARY SUTG s931.16 DIRECTORS- SUPPLIES G r DIRBCMRB' MEETING EXPENSE r 129042 JIM-S SUSPENSION 3398.00 TRUCK REPAIRS - -- - - - 129C92 JOHNS SUSPENSION SERVICE 220.31 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES O 129644 JONESTD NE SUPPLY $228.]1 129 G91 JON ES CHEMICALS INC $A 0]113 .. CHEMICALS 129045 KCTTENBUR6 MARINE 671.08 NAQIINB SUPPLIES 129046 KING BEARING INC 1669.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129047 KNOK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2,773.10 - roNETRUCTION SERVICES I-9 (") 129048 MARTIN KORDICK SR $3.248.25 N 129049 THE LAST POND 3655.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 129050 LAYMANr 40NES V EYE, LAWYERS 9733.50 LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER IND. 129C51 LEGI-TECH s320.00 PUBLICATION" - - 129052 LEE E RO CONSULTING LN4R 318r687.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38-5 129053 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $6.502.71 3EIP FIELD SAMPLING PROGRAM OCEAN MONITORING 129055 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $255.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129056 HOT ANALYTIC COMPANY 3235.00 LAB SERVICES 129057 MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC. it$223.62 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 129057 "PS s$46.93 INSTRUMENT PARTS 12905E NSA 11T.93 129059 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC s2.$42.87 MBCNRUICAL PARTS 129061 NARY AC ELECTRONICS 834.54 INSTRUMENT N PARTS "- 129061 MATT - CENTR INC $831.59 CHLORINATION PARTS 129063 MEKHREY CENTRAL TYFLYF1TlK I i196.71 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 129064 MEMNREK Sias.%? LAB SUFFUSE 129069 MICP046E OF CLNRIi08 SgBa.g7 OFFICE BQUIPNBNT ri w " ri 3 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL - PROCESSING DATE 3/31193 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP Y3 COUNTY SANITATION LISTR ICTS OE U DATE CLAIMS PAID L4/01/93 POSTING L4/07199/W/9] WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129065 MIDWAY MFG C MACHINING $23,229.20 MECHANICAL PARTS 129066 MINULSOTA WESTERN VISUAL TRES. 397.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129061 MISSION INDUSTRIES 16.222.6E UNIFORM SERVICE 129668 HEADER SUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $16.746.97 CONSTRUCTION 2-30 129069 MONTGOMERY MATSON 112.923.53 ENGINEERING SERVICES 129070 MOORE A TABER $24.750.00 BACKPILLING SERVICES 129071 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC 6166.96 HARDWARE a 129072 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION AS 1173.26 BOOKS _ m 129073 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE A 382.00 SUBSCRIPTION rn 129074 THE OHMAIIT CORP f934.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS Z 129075 DR SYSTEMS CO 313.913.0E l7 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 _ n 129076 OMEGA ENGINIERIN69 INC 91.261.7b INSTRUMENT PARTS 129077 ON-LINE ELECTRONICS S207.b4 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 129CIB ORACLE CORPORATION 61.0U.LW TRAINING REGISTRATION _ FFI 129079 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $119.24 TRUCK PARTS 3 129080 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO 11.534.83 CHEMICALS 129081 ORANGE COURIER $133.50. COURIER SERVICES _ LC) 129082 ORANGE VALVE 1 FITIINU ED. $1.875.50 FITTINGS SECURITY SERVICES 129083 OSCAR-S LOCK A SAFE $117.62 I 129084 OXYGEN SERVICE - $2.560.12 SPECIALTY GASSES n 129086 COUNTY OF ORANSANITATION $8.433.69 WORKERS COMTA MSING SERVICES P DISTRIBUTION r 229087 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT /8 r L35.69 COMPUTER HARDWARE r 129008 PC SYSTEMS DE S[6H _.. _ f495.65 _ 12908E PSSI f2r 284.55 BH118R VIDEO INSPECTION - - -- '- ' C7 129069 PACIFIC PARTS s2068.54 INSTRUMENTATION .. SAFETY SUPPLIES C 129090 PACIFIC SAFETY CQUIPMENT CO S101.96 - -' - SEWER R6PAIR8 129091 PACIFIC SEWER MAINTENANCE C $2.714.00 129092 PACIFIC BELL s651.93 TELEPHONE 88RVIC68 129093 FACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS _ . 17.734.00,__- TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS _ n 129094 FAURE JANITORIAL SUPP 1235.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES N LEGAL 88RVIC68 14-1-3A 129096 PALAIENIr TV LEX. WILNlF• f$36.78 CABLE 88RVIC68 329097 PARAGON UNLIMCAOLLITED .. . $36.7E - TRUCK PARTS 129096 PARTS UNLEMITED ,290.42 12909E ROMERT PE TEARS f29G.42 GASNIBHMENT OVERPAYMENT 129100 PIMA GBO SYSTEMS INC 31629190.51 ,. POSTAGE MACHINE H L M.O.5-8-91 129101 PITNET ROWER CREU11 [OxY f190.51 P08TAG6 AGREEMNLBASS 129102 POLYMETpI CIN INC. 61.436.45 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129202 PRESENTS INC 515.172.49 _. CATIONIC POLYMER M;0.3-11-92 - - 129303 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS s45 6.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129164 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICL $96.00 ICE 1291CS PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY $564.76 PUMP PARTS 129166 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. 42,099.14 GROUNDBKEEPING-SUPPLIES 1291L7 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 64064.16 INSTRUMBNTATION INSPECTION H.O.7-17-91 12910E OUESTRON CORP S5r432.J0 LAD SUPPLIES 129109 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES INC $29,687.76 COMPUTER 88RVIC68 M.0.0-12-92- --'--- 129110 A M CONTROLS $151.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS ri F ri L7I FUND NO 9199 - Jl UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCE351N6 GATE 3/33/93 PAGE 5 REPURI NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ... .. CLAIMS PAID 44/07/93 POSTING DATE 04/07/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129111 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO 4109.91 LAB SUPPLIES 129112 RED VALVE CO INC 35b5.11 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129113 REDI EXPRESS 569.30 MESSENGER SERVICES 129114 RUSH MARINE STUDIES. INC $560.4. OCEAN MONITORING 129125 NCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY 33,423.04 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129116 RDbINSON FERTILIZLk CU 31,331.79 CHEMICALS 129117 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL $949.4. INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES n 129118 SAFETY-KLLEN CORI $2,025.59 PARTS CLEANER m' 129119 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 3533.tl0 PLUMBING SUPPLIES Z 129120 SANTA BANK $2,956.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30 a 129121 DOUG SARVIS $375.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 129122 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS IHT-L $36.701.53 OCEAN MONITORING H.O.6-10-92 129223 C 0 WINANT Ph 0 31.304.60 OCEAN MONITORING --1 229124 SLA-BIND ELECTRONICS INC Slr i13.4V LAB SUPPLIES IT I29125 SENTEA SVSTEMS INC :25.2fit 85 INSTRUMENT 3 129126 SHASTA ELECTRIC f10.600.00 ELECTRIC SERVICES 41, 129127 SNUKELUCK SALES _. $6,066.30 _ _ HARDWARE LID129128 SILVERS INSTRUMENTATION $102.74 LAB SUPPLIES - 129129 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO 9412.41 LAB SUPPLIES I 129130 SILVERI 3 LE BOUEF 5733.50 CONSTRUCTION 7-30-1-1 n 129131 SKYPAPK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI $490.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EIANS' r 129132 SLIDE MASTER 4433.12 PRESENTATION AIDS r 129133 SMITH-EMERY CO 41,430.60 SOILS TESTING 129134 SO COAST AIR YUALITY 6610.V0 -- PERMIT FEES-- - 129135 SCAVMD UPDATE TRAINING ie91.67 TRAINING REGISTRATION Cn 129136 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO .. f903r901.60 POWER —{ 129137 SO CAL GAS CO S1 B.50tl.03 NATURAL GAB 129138 THL INANE COMPANY f700.60 TRAINING REGISTRATION n 129139 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO 59.200.17. DIESEL FUEL 129140 STARLING INSTRUMENT CO INC i250.00 METER - N 129141 STAMEN 2 SPASSOFF PE i3r220.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 129142 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO 31.380.85_ INSTRUMENT 129143 SPEC TECH INC $432.49 WELDING SUPPLIES 129144 STATEWIOE INSTALLERS $525.00 LAB EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION 129245 SUMMIT STEEL }1.700.26. METAL 129246 SUNSLT FOND 319.21 TRUCK PARTS--- 129147 SUPELCO INC $477.95 LAB SUPPLIES 129148 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS '155.46 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129149 TST NAMEPLATE 6 ENGRAVING CO $417.65 BNOINIRRING BERVICEe 129150 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMPANY $2,229.62 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 129151 THOMPSUD INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 4335.52. MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 129152 TONV•S LUCK L SAFE SCKYICE $154.79 SECURITY SERVICES - - - -- ' 129153 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO $3,424.4. CONTRACT GROUNDSREEPING H.O.11-13-91 129154 TRANSERA CORE/NTb INTERNATION. $075.00 COMPUTER BOFTNARE 129155 TRANSNATION INC $77.55 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129156 TRAVEL EALCUTIVES $1.195.96 TRAVEL SERVICES n ri 1 FUND NO 9199 - JI DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31193 PAGE G REPORT NUMULM AP43 CUUNIT SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CGUNTY CLAIMS PAID 64/G7/93 POSTING DATE 09707/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR ANUUNI OLSCRIPTION 129157 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY INC 41.060.09 TRUCK PARTS 12915E JG TUCKER S SON INL 49.498.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS .. _ 129159 TUSTIN DODGE s253.ra TRUCK PARTS 129160 TWINING LABORATORICS OF 53.360.G4 LAS SERVICES 129161 TYLAN GENERAL 32.592.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES . 129162 UHLER. INC s251039.22 CONSTRUCTION 5-32, 5-33 129163 THE UNISOURCE CORF $399.bO OFFICE SUPPLIES PARCEL SERVICES m 12916E UNITED PARCEL SLKVICL $522.63 SAFETY VIDEO RBNTAL9 129165 UNITED TAPE CORPORATION 563.9b SAF SUPPLIES Z 129166 VWR SCIENTIFIC 51.359.29 LABl gUPP SUPPBING SUPPLIES 129167 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 3159.20 n 129168 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 9410.53 LAB SUPPLIES PLUMBINGLIERVICBB 129169 VERVE-S PLUMBING $1.045.00 PUBLICATION --1 129170 WATER ENVIRDNMLNT FED. .3167.61 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92 m 129171 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 523.6A2.50 3129172 ROURKE 6 WOODRUFF s OR s13.494.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 4t 129173 XEROX CORP $2.485.80 COPIER LEADER LO 12917E GEORGE TAROLLY CO $996.69 LAB SUPPLIES 129175 GEORGE YAROLLY CO $267.77 INSTRUMBNT SUPPLIES 119176 TANDLEY INSTRUMENTS 3259.05 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIESOFFICE SUPPLIES'"' - " - - - 129177 RICHARD YOUNG PROD 573.79 CGNPUTBR SOFTWARE 1- 129178 ZENOGRAPHICS $36.27 r ----------------9 . . d TOTAL CLAIMS PAID E9/G7/93 $3.609.933.70 _ N xx xx axxxvnxxaxxv- .�_ SUMMARY AMOUNT t7 RI OPER FUND $427.97 N 62 OPEN FUND $2,900.21 62 CAP FAC FUND $23,557.11 R3 OPBR FUND $17,675.56 R3 CAP FAC FUND $796.55 F5 OPER FUND $1,194.00 K5 CAP FAC POND 6255,721.02 66 OPEN FUND $292.61 E7 OPBR FUND $31,142.06 R7 CAP FAC FUND $10 772.93' -_.... . . _... _. .__. RI1 OPER FOND 6061.19 013 OPEN FUND $95.61 016 CAP FAC FUND $39,936.96 0566 OPEN FUND $4,149.52 6566 CAP FAC FUND $24,216.23 9667 OPEN FUND 62,285.8E - - - - -- ��-- - 87616 OPER FUND $9,650.54 ,IT OPER FUND $956,523.63 CORP 62,007,962.5E - - - �- _- n SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $8,033.69 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $13_ _1,900.79 p1 . . _ _. _._ _ ..... . .. 3,609,933.70 � FUND NO 9199 - JT 015T WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 4/15/93 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP A3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS AINS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 229197 A6 TECH COMPANY $28.961.79 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.O.10-8-91 129198 A T A T $4,913.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 129199 ADVANCE SCALE CO $138.00 SCALE REPAIRS 129200 46GREKO. INC $21.181.72 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT 129201 AIR PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL IN 352.296.00 06M AGREEMENT CRY. GEN. SYST M.O.8-9-89 129202 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 35.068.00 SEWER REPAIRS DIET 7 229203 ANIKTER - DISTRIBUTION $106.48 LAB SUPPLIES n 129204 ANODYNE INC 93,060.04 ECSA DEPOSIT REFUND 129205 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 3753.7E NOTICE 6 BOB m 129206 ARATEK SERVICES INC 31.589.89 UNIFORM RENTALS 0 129207 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 31.732.30 INSTRUMENT PARTS y 12920E ARMOR - VAC 9546.00 STREET SWEEPING 129209 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP 3397.73 HLEC7RIC PARTS 129210 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC $300.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE MAULING 129211 ART WORKS 3177.60 FEARING SERVICES m 129212 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. 1130.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 3 129213 ASSOCIATED DIESEL $696.15 FILTER 129214 BKK LANDFILL $3.977.28 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91 129215 BMF CORP. FIRE PROTECTION CO 3300.00 PIPE REPAIRS 129216 BRW SAFETY A SUPPLY $1,932.76 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129217 BAKERS SQUARE 0522 $100.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 129210 BANANA BLUEPRINT 317.992.86 PRINTING 129219 BANK OF THE WEST $2,931.49 CONSTRUCPION RETENTION J-23-2 r 129220 B BATEMAN $ 551.88 BATTERIES COMP DISTRIBUTION p 129222 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $ $91.57 COMPRESSOR 129222 BAUER COMPRESSOR 397.57 LAB SU980R REPAIRS 129223 BAKTCR DIAGNOSTICS INC 3T.497.77 LAB SUPPLIES -- 129224 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS 3098.00 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 129225 BELL SECURITY 91,814.75 _ _ _ TEMPORARY SECURITY_ SERVICES [-� 129226 SIOSAFETY SYSTEMS. INC. $19.46 LAB'SUPPLIE9 - - - - --- 129227 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $440.20 RADIATOR REPAIRS (n 129228 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $5,655.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 129229 BRINDERSON CORP 316.210.05 '- CONBTRUCI'ION - PIPE SPOOLS 129230 BUDGET JANITORIAL 31.650.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129231 GARY 6 STREED $4.173.81 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 129232 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY 3427.66 -OFFICE SUPPLIES - - " - 129233 CEPA $1.108.86 LAB SUPPLIES 129234 C.G.I. SYSTEMS 11,208.95 RELAY REPAIR 129235 C N 1 3323.61 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 129236 INC PRESS INC 3388.27 LAB SUPPLIES 129237 CS COMPANY $51T.45 GAUGE 12923E CALTROL INC $5,723.78 INSTRUMENTS 129239 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC $677.03 TRUCK REPAIRS 129240 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC SATE 385.06 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129241 CALIF. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS $399.39 FITTINGS " 229242 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS $79.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION w FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 2 N REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE u4/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129243 JOMN CAROLED ENGINEERS 38.473.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38 129244 CENTURY SAFETY INST L SUPP 13.832.10 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129245 CHROME CRANKSHAFT INC 9370.90 MACHINE SUPPLIES 129246 CHURCH ENGINEERING INC $8.456.27 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-R1 129247 CITY OFFICE FURNITURE INC $412.54 OFFICE FURNITURE 129248 CLEVELAND COTTON PROD $134.16 LAB SUPPLIES 129249 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $72.57 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129250 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO 6104.B4 LAB SUPPLIES 129251 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 35.333.63 HARDWARE EQUIPMBNT m 229252 COMPUTER GRAPHICS GROUP s6.675.11 OFFICE Z 129253 COMPUSA. INC. 33.B13.26 COMPUTER SUPPLIES C 129254 COMPUSLRVE $24.20 COMPUTER SERVICES a 129255 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIV $17.12 TRUCK PARTS 129256 CON-WAY WESTERN EXPRESS $67.47 FREIGHT —I 12925? CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST S4.448.25 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES m 12925E CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTYAYS S1.727.70 PREIGNT 3129259 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO f2B1.46. LAB SUPPLIES 129260 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC i1.340.B4 TOOLS l0 129261 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $6.745.00 SOILS REPORT 129262 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $422.46 TRUCK PARTS 129263 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $488.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 129264 CYSEREX $523.83 INSTRUMENT PARTS r 129265 UNIVERSITY UNION S215.50 TRAINING REGISTRATION T— 129266 DAILY PILOT 9515.00 NOTICES 6 ADS IO 129267 DAMES L MOORE $3.651.27 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3 12926E J.Y. D-ANGELO CO INC $2,507.34 PIPE PARTS N 129269 DATA V12 INC S50.00 LAB SUPPLIES —I 129270 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 129271 BE GUELLE A SONS SLABS CO $941.53 GLASS n 129272 DELPHIN COMPUTER SUPPLY i140.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129273 DENVILLE SCIENTIFIC INC S101.97 LAB SUPPLIES Cn 129274 DEIURIK AND/OR CS CO $1.022.67 VALVE 129275 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 35.788.61 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.9-12-92 129276 DIFELIPPO ASSOCIATES $4.059.12 PRINTING 129277 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP id336T7.63 COMPUTER 90FTNAUR 12927E DISCO PRINT COMPANY $905.00 INSTRUMENT 129219 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE 1N $742.50 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 129260 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $7,645.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 129281 ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC 95,400.00 INSURANCE CONSULTANT - 129282 DUNN EDWARDS CORP S491.13 PAINT SUPPLIER 229283 D4VALS SALES S234.00 FITTINGS 129284 EIMCO PROCESS EQUIP CO 31.874.85 MRCHANICAL PARTS 129205 ESP NORTH s85.03 ELECTRIC PARTS 129206 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING $375.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129287 EASTMAN INC $9,106.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES -- 129288 ECOANALTSIS INC $45.480.80 COMPLIANCE DATABASE SYST M.O.1-13-93 W FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15193 PAGE 3 o TY NUMBER AP 13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/23/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129209 ELCCTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES f3.103.OG ELECTRICAL SERVICES 129290 EMERGENCY LIFELINE INC $5.326.88 EMERGENCY SUPPLIES 129291 ENCHANTER INC $4,400.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 129292 ENGINEERED COMFORT SYSTEMS 51.061.80 ELECTRIC PART 129293 ENTECH LAB AUTOMATION $9,845.55 LAB SUPPLIES 129294 EIT $1,386.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129295 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC $502.00 LAB SAMPLES D 129296 ERSHIGS INC $266.08 FITTINGS _ CD 129297 ESSENCE GROUP $375.27 COMPUTER PARTS m 12929A EXCHANGER WORKS DIV. $1.617.13 MECHANICAL PARTS Z 129299 MARSMALL FAIRRES f128.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION O 129300 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5.980.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 a 129302 CHEMFILTER INC $1.163.47 EQUIPMFILTERS m 129303 FILTER SUPPLY CO $3.247.21 SAFETY m 129304 FIRE CASTER f3$256.45 SAFETY 9UPPLIP8 3 129305 FIRST COMPANY ,273.56 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES LI 129306 FISHER 6 PORTER CO i5.2T3.56 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 4L 129306 FLUID SCIENTIFIC CO 3425.62 LAM 9UPPLI89 1D 129300 CLIFF HANDLING STSTENS f1.014.21 PUMP 12930E CLEF FORD p NTAIEPT S2056.00 SURVEYING SERVICES N.0.6-30-92 129310 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 36,739.60 HATER USE n 129311 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 1139.60 PAINT 9UPPLI89 r 129312 FREEDOM BY SUPPLY 311.90 TRUCE PARTS r 129313 FREEDOM IMAGING 3942.00 LAB EQUIPMENT CJ 12931J BUD FRET f42.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129324 CITY OF FULLERTON 00 HATER USE 129315 65T. INC. .2N 1 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129316 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO f580.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 129317 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO f5.009.92 TELEPHONE SERVICES n 129318 GLOBAL N-MITCHERI INC f29$138.02 M121 ANrCALSUPPLIES PARTS 129320 GLOBAL ENGINEERING f129.30 LAB 9UPPLI89 12932O GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS f129.3U �Ew` 129322 DON EEK AAN FEINTING f109520.00 PRINTING " 129323 DON GREEN f ASSOCIATES f562.00 SURVEYING SERVICE- M.0.6-10-92 129324 MSO TECHNOLOGY f114.562.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2, P2-44 129325 HARM Eft EQUIPMENT CO 3193.91 TRUCK PARTS 129326 MACH COMPANY 3206.15 TEST RIT 129326 FEED A HARPER $4,578.38 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129328 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTI $1,620.00 CONTAINER PARTS 12932E HAUSERpE CONTAINERS $1.620.00 CONTAINER ESNTA19 129330 HAUS HAWNENGINEERING EEIING $1,071.00 LAB SERVICES 12933O PL OCO INC 33.U96.05 - FILTERS 129331 HELLO s$80.00 TRAINING SUPPLIES 129333 J.M. HEMP L ERSOC 333.18 DEFERRED CORPGI9TAATION Y-OFF 129334 G. PITfl ICE HER SHELM AN $33J.18 ELECTRIC C PAY-OFF 129330 HILTI INC 3495.65 LLBCTRIC PARTS W E� 3 I FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE A t REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/22/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129335 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE $2.882.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129336 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC $129.27 COMPRESSOR PARTS 129337 HOKE CONTROLS DIV/HOME. INC. *138.23 VALVE 12933A HORIZON HIGH REACH A EQUIP 3439.58 TRUCK PARTS 129339 RS HUGHES CO INC 1207.22 HARDWARE 129340 HUNTER CORPORATION S56.070.5U CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 129341 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIS.33 WATER USE 129342 HUNTS FINAL PHASE $27.035.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE fi REPAIRS m 129343 IRO MECHANALYSIS $2.146.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS m 129349 ISC 151616.00 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES Z 129345 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $48.499.89 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92 C7 129346 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.191.17 CONNECTORS n 129347 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. 3342.43 TRUCK PARTS 129348 PACTEL TCLETRAC $4,208.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT -1 129349 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 3145.70 WATER USE 3 129350 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP $275.48 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129351 KAMAN BEARINGS L SUPPLY 128.99 HARDWARE 129352 KEENAN SUPPLY $221.68 VALVES LD 129353 KING BEARING INC $87.07 HARDWARE 12935E KNOS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 12,074.69 ELECTRIC PARTS 129355 MARTIN KORDICK SR 11.333.30 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 y 129356 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO 172.30 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERV. AGREEMENT r 129357 LA TRONICS $80.01 CAMERA r 12935E LEE a PO CONSULTING ENGR $19,567.07 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pl-39-5 t7 129359 LEUPOLD L STEVENS 1284.24 CHARTS 129360 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS. CO. S1.007.50 DEFERRED COMP DEPOSIT N 129361 KP LINDSTROM INC i1.625.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 129362 LOS ANGELES TIMES $162.59 BLBSCRIPTION 129363 MACDONALD-STEPHENS LAB $3,514.00 LAB SERVICES 129364 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC $6.900.23 MECHANICAL PARTS 129365 MANHOLE ADJUSTING S2.260.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING Cn 129366 MARINE L VALVE SUPPLY 1937.65 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 129367 WATT - CHLOR INC 31061.13 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 129368 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS $64.75 LAB SUPPLIES 129369 MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP 1437.13 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 129370 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO 1267.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129371 MICRO MOTION $727.34 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129372 MIDWAY MFG L MACHINING $3,640.00 FITTINGS 129373 MILLTRONICS $3,860.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129374 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES 1131.82 MISCBL LAN BOOS SUPPLIES 129375 MISSION INDUSTRIES /3.038.46. UNIFORM RENTALS 129376 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO $875.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129377 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $58,662.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-30 129378 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.53 WATER USE 229379 NORSKOG ELECTRIC VEHICLES $67.066.34 ELECTRIC CARTS M.O.1-13-93 129380 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE A $142.00 SUBSCRIPTION W J= � FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSIM6 DATE 4/IS/93 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE O4/21193 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129381 DX SYSTEMS CO $23.336.30 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 129382 ON LINE SOLUTIONS $430.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 129383 OPAMP TECHNICAL BOOKS $82.64 LAB SUPPLIES 129383 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $241.02 TRUCK PARTS 129385 ORANGE VALVE L FITTING CO. S1.670.31 FITTINGS 129396 ORITEX CORP - S1r286.02 MACHINE PARTS 129387 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.458.45 SPECIALTY CASES 129388 COUNTY OF ORANGE S4.310.64 SERVICE AGREEMENT - RADIOS m 129390 COUNTY SANITATION ORATION f2]$310.95 MORRBR9 COMP REIMBUR98MBNT z 129391 PGC SCI CN TIFICS CORPORATION AT10N ,121.80 LAB SUPPLIES VIDEO 129392 PSSI $2r$80.81 INWERSTRUMENT VIDEO INSPHCTION C 129392 PACIFIC PARTS f80.81 INSTRUMENT PARTS Y 129393 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 51.069.9E SAFETY NE SERVICES 129395 PACIFIC RILL f59.66 TELEPHONE SYSTEM m 129395 PACTEL JANITORIAL SYSTEMS $1.A62.87 TELBPH0N8 9Y9THM MODIFICATIONS 3 129397 PADRE JANITORIAL RDPP f5.$72.50 JANITORIAL 9UPPLI¢9 129398 PAGE MWE $68.96 PAGER CKI RENTALS it 12939E PAk WEST S36.96 PACKING SERVICES BOXES VICE 129399 PARAGON CABLE 536.1E CABLE PARTS 129400 PARTS UNLIMITED S819.55 TRUCK PARTS 12940 POT PENDERGRAFT S460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129402 PERKCN-ELVER CORPORATION 31.241. 2 LAB SUPPLI69 129403 PERNA SEAL 6064.52HARDWARE CHEMICAL 129405 PEROX IOAT ION SYSTEMS INC S3.641.42 RESIDUALS O 129306 PIMA GPO SYSTEMS INC i156$275.30 POSTAGE REMOVAL M.O.$-8-91 129A07 POLNET BRICS $193.95 POSTAGE MACNINH LEASE N 129A06 POLY FABRICS f193.95 PITH 129809 POLTPUPE INC $13.968.22 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 129409 POWER ELECTRO INDUSTRIES SUPPLY CO $68.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ARTS C-Y 129410 PRECISION IN DU9 TRIES 31.095.95 IONSTRUCTI PARTS 129412 NINE AURLICM L SONS ilA•O74.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-35-2 N 129A13 THE PROJECTS CONNECTION $T9.35 COMPUTER SOFTWARE I 129A1} THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. S3.968.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 12941 ODES TRON CORP f93.00 LAB SUPPLIES 12941 5 RAN COMPUTER SERVICES ICES INC ST,187.06 COMPUTE R SERV ICES 12941 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO $1.569.4 1 TRASH REMOVAL 129417 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO 31,lfi2.69 LAB SUPPLIES 129418 THE REGISTER $79.95 NOTICES fi ADS 129319 REISH MARINE STUDIES, INC 510160.00 OCAN MONITORING 1292O REMOTE METER RESETTING SVST .080.O POSTAGE 12942 P SUPPLY $3 . 2 PLUMBING SIPPLIHR 129422 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CORP ,929.80 LA RUPPLIB9 129423 POSEMOU INC. $2,920.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS 12942 PEGGY WILCOX $5.552. 8 DEFERRED COMP DIS TRIB UTION 129425 RUSSELLCS CONST. CU. $300.00 CONSTRUCTION 19 129126 S.S. MECHANICAL $22.309.20 CON9TRULTION Pl-33-1 t" lIl C FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/21/93 POSTING DATE 09/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129427 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS 5979.59 ELECTRIC PARTS 129428 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 5/.828.52 PLUMING SUPPLIES 129429 SANTA BANK 96,518.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30 129430 DOUG SARVIS 5375.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 129431 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS 1NT•L 517.676.95 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 129432 SCIENTIFIC ELECTRONICS SEAV. $1.294.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129433 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES INC 52.097.25 SPECIALTY GASES 129434 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS INC $334.00 LAB SUPPLIES 229435 SECURITY SPECIALISTS 5160.00 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS Z 129436 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 52.039.33 TOOL PARTS 129437 SHURELLCK SALES $T.766.98 FIWINGS 12993E SLIDE MASTER 556.03 SLIDES 129439 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP $323.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129990 90 COAST AIR QUALITY $1,260.00 PERHIT FEES 129941 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 51.690.00 PERMIT FEES 3 229492 SO CALIF ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 5120.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 129993 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $11,064.57 POWER 129999 SO CAL GAS CO 915.579.24 NATURAL GAS 129495 SOUVENIR PHOTO 4672.77 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 129996 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,342.41 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 129947 STAMEN 2 SPASSOFF PE 56.72D.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 a 129440 VESTALLOY INC 5735.91 ELECTRIC PARTS 129999 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC $597.97 PLUMING SUPPLIES LAB SUPPLIES 129451 SPY% INDUSTRIES INC S326.b2 CJ 129451 SPYGLASS INC 1157.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 129453 SUMMI FLEXIBLE $1.203.36 MOSE ETA � 129A53 SUMMIT STEEL 31.055.fil TRUCK PARTS A 129A55 SUN ELECTRIC CORP ,152.22 LAB SUPPLIES 129456 SUPELCE INC a1.178.86 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 129457 SYMANTEC CORP 578.86 229458 TEKTRAULICS &674.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129A59 THERMONI% INC SBB9.35 LAB SUPPLIES 129959 CHERLE ENVIRONMENTAL 5390.35 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129960 CH ARLES C TNOMAS f291.96 98NRITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 129461 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $360.91 OIL 6 GREASE 229462 TONY•S LOCK 3 SAFE SERVICL 5397.91 KEYS/LOCKS 129463 TRANSMATION INC 12.281.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129464 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES ♦206.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-20-92 129465 TRUCK f AUTO SUPPLY INC S192.69 TRUCK PARTS 129466 TRUESOAIL LABS 575.00 LAB SERVICES 129467 JG TUCKER 6 SON INC $314.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS 12996E TYLAN GENERAL 53.993.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 229469 US AUTO GLASS CENTERS $164.57 TRUCK PARTS 129470 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $967.00 LAB SUPPLIES 229471 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5788.91 PARCEL SERVICES 129472 US DEPT OF COMMERCE MIT $31.50 PUBLICATION Cd Ce/ V FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING C49174L PROCESSING DATE 4/15193 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/2l/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129473 VWR SCIENTIFIC 47.031.59 LAS SUPPLIES 129474 VALIN CORPORATION $861.66 RSOULATOR PARTS 129475 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $5.022.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129476 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $252.00 MOTOR RBPAIRS 129477 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS S827.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129478 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 51.628.17 LAB SUPPLIES n 129479 VERTEX SYSTEMS 51.007.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 129480 VILLAGE NURSERIES 3375.81 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES m 129481 CARL WARREN 8 CO $300.00 INSURANCE CLRINS ADMINISTRATOR 129482 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT $290.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES n 129483 WEST COAST ENVIRONMENTAL $2.371.10 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 129484 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 520.302.97 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92 129485 WESTIN ENGINEERING $540.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES -i 129486 ROURKE 0 WOODRUFF A SPRADLIN $61,676.39 _ LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 m 129487 XEROX CORP $1.819.29 COPIER LEASES 129488 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $445.31 VALVES 129489 RICHARD B EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 10 ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 $1,459.794.11 n ocavvev eeeav=evv r r � BUMMAAY AMOUNT _. N 41 OPER FUND 452.51 p2 OPER FUND $5,270.05 A 42 CAP PAC FUND $74,412.64 Cl 43 OPER FOND $29,699.77 -I 43 CAP PAC FUND $2,447.04 -- _ 45 OPER FUND $4,125.34 45 CAP FAC FM $16,641.90 46 OPER FUND $40.49 47 OPRR POND $0,349.24 47 CAP PAC FUND $12,560.84 413 OPBR FUND $924.10 - 414 OPER FUND $54.00 414 CAP PAC FUND 4278.95 E566 OPER FUND $53.64 R7614 OPER FUND $302.61 3T OPER POND $630,705.82 CORF $529,701.49 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FY $30,169.91 0T DIST WORKING CAPITAL $123,995.89 ------------------- $1,459,794.11 b0 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS- VI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA April 20,1993 1e uu9 Awuus 00 Wll 0127 MWAUX V, ..GLIr M 927254 MEMORANDUM n'^I �°" �/ TO: J.Wayne Sylvester FROM: Teti Hoffman SUB1ECf: PURCHASE OF FIVE FLAT BED TRUCKS SPECIFICATION NO.A•108 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday,April 15,1993,for the Purchase of Five Flat Bed Trucks. Tabulation of bids Is as follows: DEALER UNm PRICE TOTAL PRICE Los Angeles Freightliner/GMC S23,106.16 $115,530.80 Anaheim,CA Inland Empire White GINC 23,269.00 116,345.00 Riverside,CA Fuller Ford 23,789.00 118,945.00 Chula Vista,CA Western Truck Exchange 23,909.00 119,S45.00 Los Angeles, CA Wettruk International 24,535.63 122,678.15 La Mirada,CA Carmenita Truck Center 24,800.00 124,000.00 Santa Fe Springs,CA Its recommended theaward be made to Los AngelaS Freightliner/GMC,the low bidder forthelr proposed amount of$11S,530.80,plus all applicable sales tall Sufficient funds have been budgeted for this purchase. Respectfully}ubrinit", I Teti Hoffman ' Purchasing Manager We hereby concur/with the above recommendation: 1' l ry G.Streell1( - Director of Mance Edwin E.Hodges Assistant Director of Mal nance NCR AGENDA ITEM #10(a) - ALL DISTRICTS NCR April 20, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS d ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1081E Eu15 AVENUE VQ BOX 0127 / rOUNTMN VALLEY.C UMPNIA 927284127 V 91E19622 11 MEMORANDUM To: J.Wayne Sylvester, General Manager From: Katherine Yaro5h, Senior Buyer Re: PURCHASE OF MICROCOMPUTER HARDWARE,SOFTWARE AND ASSOCIATED PERIPHERALS, SPECIFICATION NO.E-229 Sealed bids Were Opened April 20,1993, for the Purchase of Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated PenpheMIS. Tabulation Of bids IS as follows: Vendor Price OST,Inc., Santa Ana 5 31,557.25 MICTOAge Computer, Fountain Valley $32,388.00 COMP USA,Fountain Valley S 34,491,25 JIT, Carlsbad $35,253.00 Computer Datacom, Inc., In lne $37,274.85 The above Cost figures represent twenty-two (22) different Items of Various quantities. Bid proposals Were received from flvevendors. Analyzing all bids,staff recominBnds award to 05T,Inc.,the lowest responsible bidder for all Items, for a total Cost of$31,557.25,plus sales tax Respectfully Submitted. Submitted. 1 f5 a-L-rL41tJ yw YM OO.II Katherine YaroSh Senior Buyer We hereby,PDntuf WRA the foregoing recommendations:Ted Hoffman, Purchasing Manager 37 c6& ib*o� Steve Hovey, ry 0.StreelF, Information Services Managef I Director of Finance "D" AGENDA ITEM #10(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "DR Page 1 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-One (21 ) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: May 12, 1993 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 , JOB NO. J-19-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (DedLIetl $ 192,366.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - EXTENDED OVERHEAD COST This item is for additional contractor extended supervision and engineering cost for the period of January 19, 1993 through the currently anticipated completion date of June 18, 1993. Contractor's daily rates shall not exceed the rates shown on the following schedule: Period Beginning Period Ending Rate\Calendar Day January 19, 1993 February 18, 1993 $ 1 ,712.00 February 19, 1993 April 10, 1993 $ 1 ,190.00 April 11, 1993 June 18, 1993 $ 1 ,068.00 The delays associated with these costs have been caused by further delays in starting up the owner supplied equipment and also revised startup procedures. These extended overhead costs shall not apply in the event that completion of the contract is delayed by Contractor's failure to complete work in accordance with the contract documents or if the contract is complete prior to June 18, 1993 Final accounting for this item will be provided in a future change order. �..s� "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" Page 2 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-One (211 CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: May 12. 1993 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-19-1 The time extension associated with this item represents the calendar days between February 19, 1993 and April 26, 1993. Startup testing of the facility was stopped on February 19, 1993 due to inadequate engine lube oil filters provided by the engine manufacturer. Startup testing is scheduled to resume April 26, 1993 with alternate filter elements. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM NOT TO EXCEED: $ 187,454.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 67 Calendar Days �...i ITEM 2 - FACILITY TELEPHONE LINES This item is for providing telephone service for the elevator car, electric room and control room. Telephone service to the elevator car is required by state codes and must be completed prior to commissioning the elevator. Telephone service to the control and electric rooms are required for District personnel currently occupying the control room. The work also includes revisions to the elevator mechanical room door hardware required by state elevator codes. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO J191-026, RFI J191-270) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 3,221 .00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3 - REVISE PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE SETTINGS This item is for providing pressure relief valve settings for the starting and instrument air receivers at pressures less than the maximum allowable pressure stamped on the tanks. The work includes revising four relief valve settings for the starting air receivers to 250 psig and revising two relief valve settings for the instrument air receivers to 100 psig. "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" Page 3 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-One (21) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: May 12, 1993 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 , JOB NO. J-19-1 Settings for the control pressure switches for the instrument and starting air compressors are also revised to operate the compressors at pressures less than the pressure relief valve settings. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH J191-068) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1 ,691 .00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 192,366.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 67 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued �+.✓ Change Orders. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that 67 days extension of time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 21, 1991 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date October 12, 1992 Time Extension this Change Order 67 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 335 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 935 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date September 12, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 15,410,855.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1 ,255,080.00 This Change (Add) 1Dedu1 $ 192,366.00 Amended Contract Price $ 16,858,309.00 �d "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" Page 4 of 4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty-One (21) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: May 12, 1993 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1 Board Authorization Date: May 12, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: Engineering Manager I d6nstruction Manager Date APPROVED B(Y:/�/�J� APPROVED AS TO FORM: ,L Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date HUNTER CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: � Y-*73 Contractor Date (J-19-1\C0.21) "E-4" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4" RESOLUTION NO. 93-45 1. APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS �d FOR JOB NOS. P1-38-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRIORITY - PROJECTS ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-38-2 tttttttt:ttt:ttttttttttttttttttttt WHEREAS, John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Priority .Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed project for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2, is hereby approved. Said project was included in the Program Environmental Impact Report on the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan approved on July 19, 1989. A Notice of Determination was filed by the Secretary on July 20, 1989, in accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers' , for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993. RCU.045 "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of 9 u OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX a127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ( , 4^nce cook (714)962-2411 March 9, 1993 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Additional Design Services in Connection with Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.43 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with John Carollo Engineers for Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement for additional design services, on an hourly-rate basis, including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, in an amount not to 1 / exceed $527,600.00. Existing Change per Amended Agreement Addn. No. 3 Aareement Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 156%, not to exceed $1,420,359.20 $439,800.00 $1,860,159.20 Construction Support Services and 0&M Manual Preparation, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 160%, not to exceed 223,425.80 0.00 223,425.80 Direct Expenses, at cost, not to exceed 76,690.00 35,000.00 111,690.00 Subconsultants, not to exceed 34,200.00 0.00 34,200.00 Fixed Profit 236,890.00 52,800.00 289,690.00 Total Contract, not to exceed 41.991.565.00 5527.600.00 42.519.165.00 "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(f) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS el ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 11094G ELLIS AVENUE Boards of Directors ao Sox 9127 March 9, 1993 FOUNIAIN VALLEY,CAUFO NIA 92)2e.8I2) Page Two nIAI 952-2a1 1 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. Is/William Mahoney /s/Evel" Hart William Mahoney Evelyn Hart Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee V� "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(f) ( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-46 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN. CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES AND PREPARATION OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS FOR JOB NO. P1-38 AND JOB NO. P2-43 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2 , 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES AND PREPARATION OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-38, AND MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-43, PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES IN THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR SEISMIC WORK AS PROVIDED IN THE AGREEMENT AND TO INCORPORATE ADDITIONAL CHANGES xx++xx++xx++x++++x+++xx+++xx++x+++ WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design and construction support services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43 ; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for revisions to the errors and omissions insurance requirements; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for changes in the scope of work and additional design services to include safety items, landscaping design and odor control enhancements; and, "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(f) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said \� agreement to provide for additional engineering services in the scope of work for seismic work as provided in the agreement and to incorporate additional changes; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on January 13, 1993, the Selection Committee has negotiated and certified a fee for said additional services, in accordance with established procedures for the selection of professional services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 3 dated May 12, 1993, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated June 12, 1991, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts 'Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and John Carollo Engineers for design and construction support services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional engineering services in the scope of work for seismic work as provided in the agreement and to incorporate additional changes, is hereby approved and accepted; and, "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(f) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be increased by an amount not to exceed $527,600.00, as follows, which increases the total authorized compensation from $1,991,565.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,519, 165.00: Existina Aareement Addendum Amended As Amended No. 3 Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 156%, not to exceed $1,420,359.20 $439,800.00 $1,860,159.20 Construction Support Services and Preparation of 0&M Manuals, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 160%, not to exceed 223,425.80 0.00 223,425.80 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 76,690.00 35,000.00 111,690.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 34,200.00 0.00 34,200.00 Fixed Profit 236,890.00 52,800.00 289,690.00 TOTAL, not to exceed 31.991.565.00 5527.600.00 32.519.165.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 3 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993. xnou.ors "H-3" AGENDA ITEM #10(f) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3" RESOLUTION NO. 93-47 APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAMES & MOORE. INC. TO CONDUCT SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT OF JOB NOS. Pl-38-3 AND P2-43-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAMES & MOORE, INC. TO CONDUCT SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-38-3, AND SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-43-2, PROVIDING FOR REALLOCATION OF COSTS AMONG CATEGORIES WITHIN SAID AGREEMENT x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an agreement with Dames & Moore, Inc. to conduct Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2 , Job No. P2-43-2 ; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for expanding the scope of work to include preparation of plans and specifications for Seismic Retrofitting of Headworks B and C at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2-1; and, WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for reallocation of costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the total maximum authorized compensation, and provided for a name change to Dames & Moore, Inc. , a Delaware Corporation; and, "]-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(9) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said agreement to provide for a reallocation of costs among Categories within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation; and, NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Addendum No. 3 dated May 12, 1993, to that certain Professional Services Agreement dated October 10, 1996, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Dames & Moore, Inc. to conduct Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. 1 , P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements `,•s' to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, providing for reallocation of costs among categories within said agreement, with no change in the total maximum authorized compensation, is hereby approved and accepted; and, "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" Section 2. That said reallocation of costs shall be as follows and shall not change the maximum authorized compensation of $840,620.00: Existina Agreement Addendum Amended As Amended No. 3 Agreement Professional Services, at hourly rates for labor plus overhead at 180%, not to exceed $627,540.00 $17,000.00 $644,540.00 Direct expenses, not to exceed 22,800.00 10,000.00 32,800.00 Subconsultant Fees,not to exceed 120,000.00 (27,000.00) 93,000.D0 Fixed Profit 70,280.00 0.00 70,280.00 TOTAL, not to exceed 3840.820.00 S .00 3640.620.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Addendum No. 3 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993. aeD21.017 "I-3" AGENDA ITEM #10(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS s /1\ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 - 10814 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9 2 70 0-7018 (714)962-2411 March 9, 1993 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers in Connection with Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for the preparation of a project report, design, construction plans and specifications and construction support services in connection with Jobs Nos. P1d0-2 and P247-2, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $549,000.00. Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 155%1, not to exceed $487,178.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 3,500.00 Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 12,ODO.00 Fixed Profit 46,322.00 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed s549.000.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. s/William Mahoney Is/Evelyn Hart William Mahoney Evelyn Hart Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/rhomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "in AGENDA ITEM #10( h) ( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS Bill RESOLUTION NO. 93-48 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE & RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR JOB NOS. P1-40-2 AND P2-47-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE & RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-40-2, AND FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-47-2 WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been `..J negotiated with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on February 10, 1993, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1" Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated May 12, 1993, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Services at hourly rates for labor, plus overhead at 155%, not to exceed $487,178.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 3,500.00 Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 12,000.00 Fixed Profit 46,322.00 TOTAL, not to exceed 5549.000.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993. ruciel.wa "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2" Page 1 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. One (1 ) DATE: May 12, 1993 CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. JOB: MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-30 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Dedast) $ 78,273.22 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES The Contractor encountered various underground utilities not shown on the contract drawings while excavating and placing the new 30-inch sewer line. On �-� Memory Lane, the Contractor encountered an undisclosed 6-inch water line, a 10-inch corrugated line with a 2-inch gas line inside and an 8-inch sewer line, all between Stations 13+50 and 23+79. On Parker Street, the Contractor encountered an undisclosed 6-inch water line and two 2-inch gas lines, all between Stations 99+51 and 102+ 18. These undisclosed lines caused delay to the Contractor. The costs for this extra work includes labor and equipment. This work was performed on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO No. 1-6) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 12,939.06 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - DUCTILE IRON PIPE IN LIEU OF VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE The contract documents specified the use of 30-inch diameter vitrified clay pipe in a type 4 bedding (reinforced concrete) for a gravity sewer. The Contractor requested that in lieu of vitrified clay he be allowed to use 30-inch diameter Class 52 ductile iron polyethylene lined and polyvinyl wrapped pipe with a type 2 bedding (crushed rock). This substitution has been approved by the Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association and is considered equal to or better than the Vitrified Clay under the conditions being placed. Also, the use of the Ductile Iron "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #10( k) - DI'STRICTS 1 8 2 "L-1" Page 2 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 108" ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. One (1) DATE: May 12, 1993 CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. JOB: MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 2-30 pipe speeds up the Contractor's operations and consequently causes less time to move through the residential and commercial areas. These areas were along Parker Street and under the Santa Ana River. The work was performed on a negotiated basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)21a) and results in a deduction to the contract price. CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 125,000.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3 - UNDISCLOSED ROCK CONDITIONS The Contractor encountered rock and large cobbles on Parker Street, north of Town and Country Road. Boring No. 9, taken at Station 106+00, did not indicate either rock or cobbles in this area. These nesting cobbles were found from 20 to 40 feet below the surface. The Contractor's beam drilling operations and excavation operations were delayed along with extra hauling to remove rock from site. The costs are on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-602(b)(2) and (3)• ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 32,905.16 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(k) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "L-2" Page 3 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 - 108" ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. One (1) DATE: May 12. 1993 CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. JOB: MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT NO, 2-30 ITEM 4 - BROKEN WATERMAIN A 6-inch watermain, crossing the sewer line excavation at Station 12+30 on Memory Lane, broke during the excavating process. The water line was found to be an old, fragile transite pipe which could not be anticipated. The broken water line flooded the excavation. The contractor pumped out the trench and repaired the water line, all of which delayed the contract work. The total costs amounted to $15,445.00. The contractor was deemed partially responsible for the damage. Therefore, the cost pro-ration was negotiated with the contractor to provide that District would pay for two-thirds of the cost of the damage. Thus, the contractor is to receive a credit of $10,302.00. This item was accomplished by the Contractor's Force Account pursuant to General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2(b)(2) and (3). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 10,302.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5 - EXTENDED JACKED CASING The rebuilding of the 1-5 Freeway at the intersection of Memory Lane Alley required that the sewer line under the freeway be encased in a 36-inch steel pipe and concrete grout. As part of interim freeway phasing, CalTrans ordered an additional 81 linear feet of encasement on the east side of the crossing. This encasement was a CalTrans requirement. Also, an unknown concrete thrust block on a 16-inch water line required moving the bore pit 12 feet to the east, for a total casing extension of 93 feet. The Contractor accomplished the work on a contract unit price basis pursuant to General Provisions Section 1 0-6(B)2(a), as follows: "L-3" AGENDA ITEM #10( k) - DISTRICTS 1 8 2 "L-3" Page 4 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. One(l) DATE: May 12, 1993 CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO INC JOB: MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR SEWER CONTRACT NO 2-30 Bid Item 13; 60-inch steel casing with 30-inch VCP pipe additional pipe 93 feet x $670.00/LF: = $62,310.00 Partial credit for Bid Item 6; 30-inch VCP pipe with Type II bedding. Subtract 93 feet x $131.00/LF: $(12,183.00) Credit from elimination of jacking ph component: $(3,000.00) Total, Item No. 5 = $47,127.00 TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 78,273.22 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days This change order includes all extra work and delays encountered by the Contractor from the beginning of the project, Station 1 +68.03 Santa Ana River through Town and Country Road on Parker Street, City of Orange, Station 106+00. The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "L-4" AGENDA ITEM #10(k) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "L-4" Page 5 of 6 \✓ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. One (1 ) DATE: May 12. 1993 CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. JOB: MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 2-30 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date June 30, 1992 Original Contract Time 300 Calendar Days Original Completion Date April 25, 1993 Time Extension this Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time Not Applicable Revised Final Completion Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 3,471,857.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) Qedaet) $ 78,273.22 Amended Contract Price $ 3,550,130.22 "L-5" AGENDA ITEM #10( k) - DISTRICTS 1 8 2 "L-5" Page 6 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 108" ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. One (1) DATE: May 12, 1993 CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. JOB: MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT NO, 2-30 Board Authorization Date: May 12, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: /9 93 An ineering Manager Date onstruction Manager Date APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Director of Engineering Date ' General Counsel Date MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. ACCEPTED BY: /q ontractor at ENG\2•30\w.1 "L-6" AGENDA ITEM #10( k) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "L-6" RESOLUTION NO. 93-51-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF PLACENTIA FOR EXCHANGE OF OWNERSHIP RE PALM AVENUE PURCHASE, CONTRACT NO. 2-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING EXCHANGE OF OWNERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF PLACENTIA RE PALM AVENUE PURCHASE, CONTRACT NO. 2-33 ++tr+t#t#iwwiktifft++iiiiii#t#wt## WHEREAS, District is the owner of the Palm Avenue Purchase Sewer in the City of Placentia, as shown in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, WHEREAS, said sewer can now be best utilized and maintained as a local collector sewer by the City; and, WHEREAS, District and City have agreed to exchange ownership of said Palm Avenue Purchase, Contract No. 2-33, as it appears to be in the best interests of both the District and the City of Placentia. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated May 12, 1993, by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 and the City of Placentia, exchanging ownership of the Palm Avenue Purchase, Contract No. 2-33, from the District to the City, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the transfer of ownership of said Palm Avenue Purchase shall be at no cost to the City; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993. _ \� RAem osi "M" AGENDA ITEM #10( 1 ) - DISTRICT 2 "M" RESOLUTION NO. 93-53-5 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-34-3 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS TO BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 3 , CONTRACT NO. 5-34-3, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT t ttttt+tt++t++t+++++tttt++t++++t+t The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Silveri & LeBouef, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3 , Contract No. 5-34-3 , on October 15 , 1992 ; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3 . That Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3 , Contract No. 5-34-3 , is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated September 10, 1991; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Silveri & LeBouef, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(m) - DISTRICT 5 "N-1" Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 5, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993. RC54D.D53 "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(m) - DISTRICT 5 "N-2" Page 1 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. No. One (1) CONTRACTOR: SILVERI & LEBOUEF JV DATE: May 12. 1993 JOB: ABANDONMENT OF RED HILL PUMP STATION. PHASE 1. CONTRACT NO. 7-14-1-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) S 0.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - TIME EXTENSION Due to the record rainfall in December 1992 and January 1993, which either prevented the contractor to work during the rainfall or the resultant flooding of lv/ undeveloped job site, the contractor is granted thirty-three (33) calendar days of time extension. Granting of the time extension is in accordance with the General Provisions Section 6-4. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 33 Calendar Days TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 0.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 33 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 33 days extension of time to perform the work Is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor. "0-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(n) (1) - DISTRICT 7 "0-1" Page 2 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. No. One (1) CONTRACTOR: SILVERI & LEBOUEF JV DATE: May 12, 1993 JOB: ABANDONMENT OF RED HILL PUMP STATION, PHASE 1. CONTRACT NO, 7-14-1-1 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date November 14, 1992 Original Contract Time 60 Calendar Days Original Completion Date January 2, 1993 Time Extension this C.O. 33 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 33 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 93 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date February 4, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date February 4, 1993 Original Contract Price $ 90,732.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0 This Change (Add) (Dedwet) $ 0 Amended Contract Price $ 90,732.00 "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(n) (1 ) - DISTRICT 7 "0-2" Page 3 of 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. No. One (1) CONTRACTOR: SILVER] & LEBOUEF JV DATE: May 12, 1993 JOB: ABANDONMENT OF RED HILL PUMP STATION. PHASE 1. CONTRACT NO. 7-14-1-1 Board Authorization Date: May 12, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: ngineering Manager Date Xonstruction Manager Date APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Director of Engineering Date Gener9l Counsel Date SILVERI & LEBOUEF ACCEPTED BY: l/ C ,tractor (7-14-1-1\C0.1) "0-3" AGENDA ITEM #10(n) (1 ) - DISTRICT 7 "0-3" RESOLUTION NO. 93-55-7 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-14-1-1 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING ABANDONMENT OF RED HILL PUMP STATION, PHASE 1, CONTRACT NO. 7-14-1-1, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT x txxxxtxtttttttttttttttxxttxxxtttx The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Silveri & LeBouef, JV, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1, on February 4, 1993; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of ..i Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated November 4, 1992; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Silveri & LeBouef, JV, setting forth the terms and conditions for "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(n) (2) - DISTRICT 7 "P-1" acceptance of Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 7, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993. RC5A0.055 "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(n) (2) - DISTRICT 7 "P-2" �i RESOLUTION NO. 93-56-7 AUTHORIZING GRANT OF EASEMENT TO CROW WINTHROP DEVELOPMENT RE CONTRACT NO. 7-11-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A GRANT OF EASEMENT TO CROW WINTHROP DEVELOPMENT RE MICHELSON PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-11-2 WHEREAS, Crow Winthrop Development has heretofore dedicated a site to the Districts for the Michelson Pump Station, and by separate action has quitclaimed a ten-foot wide sewer easement through said site to the District; and, WHEREAS, Crow Winthrop Development has requested a new ten-foot wide sewer easement through said site for construction of a sewer to serve the adjacent Park Place development. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated March 24, 1993, wherein a ten foot right-of-way required to install a new sewer line over the northeasterly corner of District's Michelson Pump Station Site, Contract No. 7-11-2, is granted to Crow Winthrop Development, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of this "0-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(o) - DISTRICT 7 "0-1" resolution; and, Section 3 . That said easement is hereby granted for no fee; and, Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized and directed to execute said easement on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 7. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993. WD.056 "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(o) - DISTRICT 7 "0-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-57-21 APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LEASE AGREEMENT WITH GTE RE SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR LEASE OF REAL PROPERTY WITH GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY FOR PLACEMENT OF EMERGENCY GENERATOR ON PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr*rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That an Agreement for Lease of Real Property by and between General Telephone Company, dba GTE California Incorporated (Lessor) , and County Sanitation District No. 11 (Lessee) , wherein Lessor agreed to lease approximately 1,206 square feet of property adjacent to the District's Slater Avenue Pump Station, in the vicinity of Slater Avenue and Gothard Street in the City of Huntington Beach, to Lessee for the purpose of placing an on-site generator to serve said pump station in an emergency, was approved on February 10, 1988; and, Section 2. That the term of said lease shall be extended for three (3) years commencing February 1, 1993; and, Section 3. That payment to General Telephone Company in the amount of $1,900.00 per year for said lease is hereby authorized, in accordance with the provisions of said agreement; and, Section a. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Amendment No. 1 to said lease agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993. RMO.057 "R" AGENDA ITEM #10(q) - DISTRICT 11 "R" RESOLUTION NO. 93-49 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-20 (CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION) RE 1993 SUMMER WORK PROGRAM A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION NO. 79-20, AS AMENDED, RE 1993 SUMMER WORK PROGRAM FOR PAINTING AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: - Section 1. That a 1993 Summer Work Program for painting, groundskeeping and general cleanup work around the treatment - plant facilities is hereby authorized and established; and, Section 2. That Exhibit "Be of Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, is hereby further amended to add temporary, part-time classifications thereto, as set forth below: EXHIBIT "B<" OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE CLASSIFICATIONS Aooroximate Monthly Position Authorized Ranae Hourly Eauivalent Classification Classification Personnel No. Rate Salary 30645 Part-time 38 — 58.00/hr. — Assistant max and that the General Manager is authorized to employ temporary, part-time personnel in said classification; ' and, "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (6) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-1" Section 3. - That the General Manager is hereby authorized to temporarily upgrade up to eight, full-time, permanent, Maintenance Department employees to Temporary Crew Leader status and to increase their compensation one salary range (5.5%) during the period set forth below in Section 7; and, Section 4. That the authorized annual expenditure for said Summer Work Program should not exceed $225,000.00; and, Section 5. That Resolution No. 92-46 is hereby rescinded; and, Section 6. That any other resolution or motion that conflicts herewith is hereby repealed and made of no further effect; and, Section 7. That the authorizations contained herein shall become effective May 24, 1993, and terminate September 24, 1993. v� PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993. RPERM.051 "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (6) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-50 URGING EQUITABLE ALLOCATION OF PROPERTY TAXES AND STATE SUPPORT OF SCHOOL FUNDING IN ALL CALIFORNIA COUNTIES BEFORE CONSIDERATION OF FURTHER PROPERTY TAX SHIFTS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, URGING EQUITABLE ALLOCATION OF PROPERTY TAXES AND STATE SUPPORT OF SCHOOL FUNDING IN ALL CALIFORNIA COUNTIES BEFORE CONSIDERATION OF FURTHER PROPERTY TAX SHIFTS tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt WHEREAS, pursuant to Proposition 13, the state-wide average allocation of the 1% ad valorem property tax is 35% to schools and 65% to fund all other levels of local government; but in Orange County 45% is allocated to schools leaving only 55% to fund all other levels of local government; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to the Serrano Priest decision, the Average Daily Attendance (ADA) amount per student allocated by the state to Orange County schools is approximately $50 million per year less than the state-wide average allocation; and, WHEREAS, these actions create an unfair and inequitable situation that has resulted in orange County paying disproportionately more for schools resulting in $268 million less being available for funding other local government services; while at the same time also receiving disproportionately less in state financial support for schools amounting to $50 million less annually; and, WHEREAS, the Governor and Legislature of the State of California shifted $1.3 billion from Counties, Cities and Special "T-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (7) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-1" Districts property taxes and other revenues in Fiscal Year 1992-93 to help meet the state's obligation to fund schools and `.../ balance the state's budget; and, WHEREAS, the Governor and Legislature of the State of California are proposing to shift an additional $2.6 billion from Counties, Cities and Special Districts property taxes and other revenues in 1993-94 to help balance the state's budget; and, WHEREAS, these property tax shifts are placing an undue financial strain on local governments requiring them to take a combination of drastic measures that include cuts or elimination of vital municipal services and programs, laying off public employees, and passing through the property tax shift to citizens in the form of higher taxes and fees; and further property tax shifts will only exacerbate this situation. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Directors hereby urge that no further shift of property taxes from Counties, Cities and Special Districts to fund schools be considered until the following goals have been met: A. That no county in California be asked to contribute any additional amount of its 1% ad valorem property tax to fund K-14 education until all counties in the state match that county's level of contribution of the 1% ad valorem property tax; and, B. That all publicly-funded school systems in each county V� "T-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (7) 7 ALL DISTRICTS "T-2" contributing at least 40% of its property tax for education will, at a minimum, receive the state Average Daily Attendance funding per student. Section 2. That the Secretary of the Boards of Directors be directed to provide copies of this resolution to the Governor and the Members of the Legislature of the State of California, and to public agencies and other interested parties in Orange County as deemed appropriate. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993. RAU63.06O "T-3" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (7) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-3" RESOLUTION NO. 93-52 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 5-37-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, BETWEEN THE ARCHES (NEWPORT BOULEVARD) AND DOVER DRIVE, CONTRACT NO. 5-37-4 WHEREAS, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed project for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4, is hereby approved. Said project was included in the Program Environmental Impact Report on the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan approved on July 19, 1989. A Notice of Determination was filed by the Secretary on July 20, 1989, in accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, "U-1" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 11U-1" Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by Boyle Engineering Corporation, Districts' engineers' , for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4, are hereby approved and adopted; and, - Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and, Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 5. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993. xcao.orz "U-2" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICTS 5 8 6 "U-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-54-5 `✓ AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 5-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CRYSTAL COVE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-36 *rrrr*rrr+rr+**rr*rrarrrrrrrrrrrrr The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which is a portion of the previously-approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the District's Board of Directors on July 19, 1989; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Schuler Engineering Corporation for Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, be awarded to Schuler Engineering Corporation, in the total amount of $993,442.00 in accordance with the terms "V-1" AGENDA ITEM #31 (d) - DISTRICT 5 "V-1" of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the chairman and Secretary of District No. 5 are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993. RCW.054 "V-2" AGENDA ITEM #31(d) - DISTRICT 5 "V-2" ORDINANCE NO. 320 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 317 PROVIDING FOR A SEPARATE CLASS OF CONNECTION CHARGES FOR CERTAIN MINIMUM SIZE DWELLING UNITS WHEREAS, the District has established a requirement that all residential structures seeking to connect to the District's sewer facilities apply for and receive a connection permit and to pay a connection charge, all as prescribed in Ordinance No. 317, as amended; and, WHEREAS, connection charges are assessed to provide for the cost of construction of wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities necessary to serve new development or new connection of existing structures; and, WHEREAS, the connection charges presently in effect provide for a uniform rate of $2,350.00 for each residential dwelling unit without regard for size, use or number of plumbing fixtures; and, WHEREAS, the existing connection charges were adopted after the completion of the master plans of capital facilities for both the joint treatment works and the District's sewer system, together with related financial and engineering reports; and, WHEREAS, the District has recently evaluated and considered the financial and engineering impacts of development of extremely small individual dwelling units within multi- residential projects to accommodate independent retired or senior citizen dwelling needs. 1 "W_1" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) (2) - DISTRICT 3 11W-111 1 NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, does hereby FIND as follows: Section 1: That there is a considerable increase in the retired and elderly or "senior" citizen population within the District, many of which are in need of lower cost housing accommodations. Section 2: That there are residential housing projects being developed within the District containing small individual living accommodations with minimum plumbing fixtures and typically limited to single person occupancy. Section 3: That as a class, the development and occupancy of the small dwelling units places a proportionately smaller burden on the District and joint works sewerage facilities. Section 4: That the present schedule of residential dwelling unit connection charges may be inequitable when applied to certain low cost, minimum size dwelling units as a class. Section 5: That the District will be impacted financially by the adoption of a separate class of reduced-connection charges for low cost, minimum size dwelling units that qualify and meet the criteria for such reduced charges, as provided herein, which impacts will be reviewed and evaluated periodically by the District. 2 "W-2" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "W-2" NOW, TBERE 'ORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County California, does hereby ORDAIN: Section 1: That Section 702 of Ordinance No. 315 is hereby amended, by adding Subsection B(6) to read as follows: "702. DISTRICT NO, 2 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION CHARGES. A. . . . B. District Connection Charge Amounts. (6) Capital facilities connection charges for new construction residential dwelling units of less than 600 square feet that satisfy all of the following criteria shall be $_ per dwelling unit: (a) The unit is designed to accommodate not more than 2 persons. (b) The unit contains only one toilet fixture and one bath/shower fixture. (c) The unit is a component of a multi-unit residential project designed to accommodate retired or "senior" citizen residents only. ''. 3 "W-3" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "W-3" (d) The project has been approved for development by the city or county as a special housing project to accommodate retired or senior citizens with a low cost housing facility. (e) That all other permitting authorities for the project provide a reduction in their fees to be assessed on the project. (t) The local sewering agency concurs in the request for approval of these reduced fees. (g) The city, or county, responsible for issuing the building permit for the project concurs with the request for approval of these reduced fees and agrees to waive its 5% administrative fee for collecting District sewer connection charges for the project. (h) The developer must submit an application and receive approval of the Board of Directors of District for the charge established by this Subsection in accordance with Subsection()below. 4 "W- AG=NDA IT_M #34(b) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "W-4" (7) The developer of a multi-dwelling unit project designed to accommodate retired or "senior" citizen residents may apply to the District for a connection permit and pay the connection charge as established in Subsection (6) above. The developer-applicant must establish that all the criteria have been met and that the city or county, as the development approval authority, has certified the project as providing low-cost housing accommodations for retired or senior citizens. The Board of Directors has absolute discretion and authority to grant or deny the application based upon the information provided and taking into consideration the financial and engineering impacts upon the District and upon the project." PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held this_day of , 1993. n012UMW:pjM) V 5 "W-S" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "W-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 2, 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON APRIL 14, 1993 _ 0ITATfON ;Ai�e`o9°11mn OooIJl9 � set P O 0 N Sioc. 195p ONgNGE COUN ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanhation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 5. 7. 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on April 14, 1993,at 7:30 P.m.,in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported B quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, B, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACME ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DWRICT NO. l: Roben Richardson, Chairman Thomas E. LuR Fred Banera.Chairmen pm tam Gem Beyer ' James M. Ferryman Nate Meade Thomas R. Sanarelli Leslie Fontious Roger Samon William G. Stainer • DISTRICT NO.2: Henry W.Wedaa, Chairman John M.Gueiason John Collins, Chairman pro tam George Scott a_ Fred Banera Gene Beyer Bob Bell Barry Denes • Burk Catlin Molly McClenelan • Wiliam D. Mahoney James H.Flom Maria Morem Norman Z. Eckenrade L Carmy J. Nelsen Glenn Parker try Pic*her Tom Daly Miguel Pulieo _X Thomas E. Lutz Roper Stanton William G.Steiner George L.Baker Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO. 3: Sal A. Sapien, Chairman Don Maniner Burnie Dunlap, Chairman pro tam y_ Caney J. Nelson Buck Catlin Melly McClamhan John Collin George Scott James V.Evam Margie L Rice X James H. Flora William D.Mahoney _X Don R.Griffin Anhui Brown Gail Kerry Cecilia L. Age Frank Laszlo Gwen A. Forsythe Thames E. Lutz RobW Richardson • Eva G. Miner Wally Linn • IN Rose, Tom Daly Jim Silva lane Plainville Sheldon Singer George L. Zlaket y Roger Stanton William G.Steiner y_ Charles Selina _ Ronald Bates DISTRICT NO. S: L John C. Cos,Jr., Chairman Jan Debay Phil Samam Jan Debay William G.Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: . James A.Waller, Chairman Anhur Perry . Evelyn Han.Chairman pro tam John C. Us,Jr. y_ William G. Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: ,y_ tlanes E. Puckett, Chairman Thomas R. Saltarelli • James A.Waller, Chairman pro tam Mike Schaefer • Fred Banera Gene Beyer • Jan Debay Phil Sansone Barry Hammond Mike Ward Too Morem Miguel Pulido X William G. Steiner Roper Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: i_ Grace Wnchell, Chairman Eade Rubileille z Victor Leipzig, Chairmen We tam Jim SING i Roger Stanton William G. Steiner eJ DISTRICT NO. 13: ,Jl_ John M.Guliason, Caiman _ Henry W. Wedge i Fred Barrels.Chairman pro tam Gem Beyer i Glenn Parker Burnie Dunlap r X IN Romer Tam Daly William G. Steiner Roper Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: Peer A. Swan,Chairman Dary[hiller Leslie Pantious, Chairman pro tam Charles E. Puckett Fred Banera Gene Beyer v Berry Hammond Mike Ward William G. Stein Roger Stanton —2— 04/14/93 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manger, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Susan Bradford, Chris Cervellone, Corinne Clawson, Patti Gorczyca, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Margie Nellor, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, Mary Simpson, Ed Torres, Chuck Winsor, Ray Young OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Edward Czuker, Harvey Hunt, Bill Knopf, Jim Parker, Phil Stone ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file resolution of the Board of Supervisors re change in That Resolution No. 93-252 from the Board appointment of active and alternate of Supervisors re change in appointment of representatives active and alternate representatives, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: Districts Active Director Alternate Director 1,2,3 & 11 Roger R. Stanton William G. Steiner 5,6,7,13 & 14 William G. Steiner Roger R. Stanton ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed recently Presentation of Districts' pin to new seated Director William Steiner to the Boards Director and presented him with a pin bearing the Districts' logo. The pin is similar to the service pins given to employees and recognize the Directors for their service on the Boards of the Sanitation Districts. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the Report of the Joint Chairman tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, April 21st, at 5:30 p.m. Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee - Tuesday, April 27th, at 11:30 a.m., at the South Coast Air Quality Management District offices in Diamond Bar Executive Committee - Wednesday, April 28th, at 5:30 p.m. (Directors Barry Hammond and Frank Laszlo were also invited to attend.) Personnel Committee - Thursday, April 29th, at 5:30 p.m. -3- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager stated that he was Report of the General Manager trying to schedule a second tour for the new Directors who were unable to attend the `.J orientation and treatment plant tour held on January 30th. He requested those Directors to complete and turn in to the Board Secretary a form included in their folders indicating alternative dates. Mr. Sylvester stated that once the tour date was set, all Directors would be notified and are encouraged to attend. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Aooroval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Aooroval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Aooroval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -4- 04/14/93 DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 03/10/93 03/24/93 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - S 677,448.08 $977,467.70 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,421,117.67 765,184.02 Joint Working Capital Fund - 179,797.23 483,815.16 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 1,988.14 219,122.16 DISTRICT NO. 1 - .00 58,477.70 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 332,769.99 35,648.62 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 301,248.87 13,380.71 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 83,994.99 8,750.59 DISTRICT NO. 6 - .00 29.51 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 40,098.12 11 ,147.61 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 1,149.30 5,275.06 DISTRICT NO. 13 - .00 .00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 929.85 45,943.50 ° DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 23,221 .93 3,218.68 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,303.10 .00 , DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 7,747.69 .00 - 53.073.814.96 52,627,461 .03 l / -5- 04/14/y; ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of One Steam Sterilizer Unit (Autoclave). That the bid tabulation and recommendation Specification No. E-226 (Revised), to re award of Purchase of One Steam Sterilizer �...� Amsco Scientific. Division of Unit (Autoclave), Specification No. E-226 American Sterilizer Company (Revised), be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Amsco Scientific, Division of American Sterilizer Company, for a total amount not to exceed $27,145.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Hewlett-Packard for Purchase That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to of Gas Chromatograph/Mass issue a purchase order to Hewlett-Packard Spectrometer System, Specification Company in the amount of $62,000.00, No. E-228 plus tax and freight, for Purchase of Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer System, Specification No. E-228. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and Nos. 1-9 and J-22-2 specifications for Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. 1-9, and `...' Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-22-2, authorizing an addition of $83,741 .00 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich and Sons, for three items of additional work, granting a time extension of 14 calendar days for completion of said additional work, and one item pertaining to a contract- authorized sales tax adjustment, and one other contract adjustment, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Director Collins stated that he believed many Approving Change Order No. 20 of the items in change orders for this project to the plans and specifications for and others are a result of inefficiencies or Job No. J-19-1 inadequacies of the design engineer and cited examples in Change Order No. 20. He observed that although the change order cost for omitted work may not be any more than would have been paid if included in the original bid, he was concerned that there may be other incidental costs. He also noted that the contractor should not be penalized or the work delayed because of these deficiencies. He asked that staff include the name of the design engineer in the change orders and develop a system to rate design engineers' proficiency to be considered in future work. Director Collins then moved approval of Change Order No. 20 with the specific recommendation that the design engineer's name be shown in the minutes for this project. -6- 04/14/93 It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 20 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, designed by Brown and Caldwell, authorizing an addition of $53,586.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for 12 items of additional work or other contract adjustments, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is Professional Services Agreement with hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum John Carollo Engineers for design and No. 2 to the Professional Services construction services. Preparation Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for of operations and maintenance design and construction services, manuals. and training services for preparation of operations and maintenance Job Nos. P1-36 and P2-42 manuals, and training services re Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 , Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, to change the scope of work and to provide for additional design services to investigate new technology for modifications to enhance advanced treatment effectiveness and efficiency and provide operational flexibility and reliability. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a That the Selection Committee be, and is Professional Services Aoreement for hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and Job Nos. P1-46 and P2-55 negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for engineering evaluation and design and construction support services required for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill for design That the Selection Committee certification and programming services for Job of the final negotiated fee relative to the No. J-31 Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill for design and programming services required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-37, approving said agreement with CH2M Hill for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $690,148.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -7- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Aoprovina Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo That the Selection Committee certification Enaineers to prepare plans and of the final negotiated fee relative to the \.J specifications and to provide Professional Services Agreement with John construction support services for Job Carollo Engineers to prepare plans and Nos. J-33 and J-34 specifications and to provide construction support services for Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Gutfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-38, approving said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $950,252.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committee Committee's meeting and Executive Committee's meeting held on March 17, 1993 and March 24, 1993, respectively, be and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Discussion re Investment Management Policy and Proposed Reserve Repurchase Investment Program Verbal report of staff The Districts' Financial Manager, Patti Gorczyca, reported that the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committees are recommending revisions to the Districts' investment management policy to implement provisions for reverse repurchase transactions, subject to satisfactory resolution of any questions by the Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector (County Treasurer( pertaining to banking services provided by his office on behalf of the Districts. Based on recent performance of the securities market, the Districts could expect to earn approximately $1 .2 million annually from this program. The proposal provides that the Districts would appoint a separate Treasurer and dealer to manage the program, and the County Treasurer would continue to provide other Treasury and investment services as in the past. -8- 04/14/93 The office of County Counsel has reviewed the March 23, 1993, letter from the General Counsel (included in the Directors' original April 14 agenda package), which concluded that the Districts are empowered to appoint their own Treasurer, who could be a person other than the County Treasurer, and that there are no prohibitions or restrictions imposed on either the County Treasurer or the Districts relating to the ability of the Districts to transfer their funds to the County Treasury for purposes of deposit and investment, or for the County to provide other Treasury services. County Counsel has concurred with General Counsel's opinion. , Ms. Gorczyca further reported that the County Treasurer performs other banking and investment services for the Districts and has since our inception. General Counsel and County Counsel agreed that the County Treasurer would not be impaired from continuing to provide both services should the Districts decide to appoint a separate Treasurer. Those services could be provided under a simple agreement between the Districts and the County, but the County Treasurer expressed that he would be obligated to charge a fee for these services as he would no longer be performing all of the Treasurer functions. The County Treasurer has not yet determined an appropriate charge, but has offered the Districts another alternative for consideration. Ms. Gorczyca reported that since the Executive Committee meeting, the County Treasurer has offered to make the reverse repurchase investments on behalf of the Districts for a $200 flat fee per transaction and referred Directors to a letter dated April 12, 1993, from Robert L. Citron, included in their meeting folders. The County Treasurer's alternative proposal provides �✓ the Districts with perhaps the best of both worlds. It supports the financial goal of the Districts' reverse repurchase program, since it does allow us to achieve the same improved yield on cash reserves as anticipated, and actually reduces the costs of the program. If a separate Districts' Treasurer were to engage in reverse repurchases, the Districts would incur costs of custodial bank services considerably in excess of the $200 flat fee. Also, it has always been the Districts' intent to carry out the reverse repurchase program in partnership with the County Treasurer in order to tap the established expertise of Bob Citron. Additionally, the Districts would retain the benefit of all the Treasury services as currently provided by the County Treasurer at no charge. The basic difference is that if the Districts were to appoint a separate Treasurer, we would "direct" rather than "request" the reverse repurchase investments and would need to negotiate a fee for other banking services amenable to both the County Treasurer and Districts. The Financial Manager advised the Board Members that based on the County Treasurer's alternative proposal, if the Directors wished to proceed with the ' reverse repurchase program, the Joint Boards now had the option of either approving the original proposal providing for the appointment of a separate , Districts' Treasurer and dealer to manage the reverse repurchase program, or approving the County Treasurer's proposed alternative reverse repurchase program. -9- 04/14/93 Following a brief discussion, the following action was taken. Authorizing the County Treasurer to make reverse repurchase investments on behalf of the Districts Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the County Treasurer be, and is hereby, confirmed as the Districts' Treasurer; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the County Treasurer be, and is hereby, authorized, upon request by the Districts' financial staff, to make reverse repurchase investments in U.S. Treasuries securities of a maximum amount of $50 million, not to exceed ten-year maturities, and that payment of those securities be made by reversing the securities against themselves; and authorizing payment to the County Treasurer of a $200 flat fee per transaction; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to confirm in writing with the County Treasurer, on behalf of the Districts, this action of the Boards. Directors A. B. Catlin and Roger R. Stanton requested that their abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizing lease of Bloomberg financial reporting system Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to lease the Bloomberg financial reporting system to provide financial market monitoring to aid staff in administering the reverse repurchase and other Districts' financial programs. Directors A. B. Catlin and Roger Stanton requested that their abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -10- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Fixed Floating Interest Rate Swat) 0993 SWAM Authorizing staff to proceed with preliminary 1993 SWAP structuring. utilizing underwriters Merrill Lynch and Paine Webber Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to proceed with preliminary 1993 SWAP structuring, utilizing underwriters Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber on a fee contingency basis, subject to final authorization by the Boards to conduct the transaction. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Directing staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, directed to submit a list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services for the 1993 SWAP for consideration by the Boards. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Standard and Poor's Rating Agency for review of 1993 SWAP structures Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Standard and Poor's Rating Agency for review of 1993 SWAP structures in ° an amount not to exceed $30,000. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record -11- 04/14/93 Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Moody's Rating Agency for review of 1993 SWAP structures Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Moody's Rating Agency for review of 1993 SWAP structures in an amount not to exceed $30,000. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Advanced Refunding Certificates of Participation. 1993 Series I Authorizing staff and Merrill Lynch to proceed with preliminary steps necessary to structure and bring to market the 1993 Series I Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and Merrill Lynch be, and are hereby, authorized to proceed with preliminary steps necessary to structure and bring to market the 1993 Series I, on a fee contingency basis, subject to final authorization by the Boards to conduct the transaction. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizing staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized to submit a list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services for the 1993 Series I for consideration by the Boards. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. 12- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS `..� Actions re Course of Construction Master Program Directing staff and Robert F. _ Driver Company to implement the Master Course of Construction Program Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and Robert F. Driver Company be, and are hereby, directed to implement the Master Course of Construction Program. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Appointing Zurich Insurance Company as the insurance carrier for the Master Course of Construction Program Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Zurich Insurance Company be, and is hereby, appointed as the insurance carrier for the Master Course of Construction Program, at an estimated annual premium not to exceed $125,625.00 in accordance with terms summarized below: -13- 04/14/93 PREMIUM RATE: $.125 per $100 per year LIMITS: $45,000,000 per Occurrence Sublimits: Earthquake: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate Flood: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate Transit: $500,000 Offsite Storage: $500,000 Debris Removal: $5,000,000 Expediting Expense: $250,000 Extra Expense: $1,000,000 DEDUCTIBLES: All Other Perils: $10,000 Flood: $50,000 Earthquake: 5% of values at risk at time of loss subject to $100,000 minimum. TOTAL INSURABLE VALUES: $100,500,000 Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -14- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Biofiltration Demonstration Project amending November 18, 1992 actions Authorizing the General Manager to execute a grant agreement with the Southern California Edison Company - for Partial funding Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manger be, and is hereby, authorized to execute a grant agreement with the Southern California Edison Company for partial funding of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project in the amount of $50,000.00. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizing the General Manager to execute a specific-term employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basra! for engineering services Moved, seconded and duly carried: �.. That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute a specific-term employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services for the Biofiltration Demonstration Project for up to a twelve-month period, at an hourly rate of $21 .63 per hour, for a maximum amount not to exceed $45,000.00. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizing staff to proceed with the Biofiltration Demonstration Proiect Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to proceed with the Biofiltration Demonstration Project. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this _ item be made a matter of record. ` -15- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Building Committee That the written report of the Building Committee's meeting held on March 18, 1993, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Specification No. M-044 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-41 , approving plans and specifications for Office Trailer Relocation at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve the written report of the Conservation. Recycle That the written report of the Conservation, and Reuse Committee Recycle and Reuse Committee's meeting held on March 25, 1993, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to complete negotiations for an agreement with That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to the OCWD providing uo to complete negotiations for an agreement with 50 mad of secondary effluent to the the OCWD, in form approved by General OCWD for recycling purposes Counsel, that would provide up to 50 mgd of secondary effluent to the OCWD for recycling purposes at no charge, with a provision to, at any time, reevaluate the valuation and pricing for secondary effluent; and to provide for purchase of GAP water for 20 years at the audited cost to operate and maintain the GAP facility. The contract would provide that the Districts' cost would not exceed the 0&M cost or the lowest cost of any GAP customer, whichever is less. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to execute an agreement with OCWD for pilot plant That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to testing of UV light disinfection execute an agreement with OCWD for pilot technology plant testing of UV light disinfection technology, with estimated $160,000 costs to be shared equally in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the Districts' portion of out-of-pocket costs for outside consulting services, and $40,000 for the Districts' in-house laboratory services. -16- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-2 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-42-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, clarifying miscellaneous mechanical and electrical items, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-42-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, making miscellaneous clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-42-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications, making changes to the General and Special Provisions re Insurance Requirements, be, and is hereby approved. Awarding Job No. P2-42-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-42, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, to Margate Construction, Inc., in the total amount of $14,496,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ' -17- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1 Approving Addendum No. 1 to plans and specifications for Job No. P2-43-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1 , changing the bid date and establishing a date and time for job walk, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-43-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Awarding Job No. P2-43-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-43, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1 , to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount of $3,398,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive. file and approve written report of the Special Joint Works That the written report of the Special Joint Selection Committee re Computers Works Selection Committee re Computers' meeting held on March 30, 1993, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. v� -18- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving the three-phase approach for the Computerized Facilities That the three-phase approach for the Records and Drawings Systems. Computerized Facilities Records and Job No. J-25-1 Drawings Systems, Job No. J-25-1, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That preceding with implementation of three-phase approach, be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Special Selection Committee Re Computers to solicit That the Special Selection Committee Re proposals and negotiate Professional Computers be, and is hereby, authorized to Services Contract(sl solicit proposals and negotiate Professional Services Contract(s) for the phased approached for consideration by the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors of General Counsel's Comments Prior to the need for a closed session as authorized Closed Session by Government Code Section 54956.9 to review: 11 Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to the co-generation internal combustion engines. 2) Review of claim filed by Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, Attorneys at Law and receive recommendation of General Counsel re possible litigation. 3) Review and consideration of possible settlement of enforcement action initiated by Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed se Sion pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at 8:30 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 9:50 p.m. the Boards reconvened in ' Reconvene in regular session regular session. -19- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Denvina claim of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon for additional That the claim of Mudge Rose Guthrie fees for special Co-Bond Counsel Alexander and Ferdon for additional fees for services re Advance Refundina special Co-Bond Counsel services re Certificates of Participation. Advance Refunding Certificates of 1992 Series Participation, 1992 Series, be, and is hereby, respectively denied. Director Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Settlement Agreement with Velie Circuits oertainina to That the proposed Settlement Agreement Enforcement Action re Industrial with Velie Circuits pertaining to Enforcement Waste Permit No. 6-1-144 Action re Industrial Waste Permit No. 6-1-144, as recommended by staff and General Counsel, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager is hereby authorized to execute said agreement, in form approved by General Counsel. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Repairs and Modifications �../ Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Specification No. R-040 Verbal staff report Director of Engineering, Tom Dawes, reported that recently staff did some testing on two of the six new digester gas flares. One was tested at each plant and it was discovered that the flares were not in compliance with Districts' AQMD requirements, by a minor amount. Staff notified the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as required, and a variance was granted for 30 days to fix the two flares. The flares were repaired under emergency staff authority, tested and are now operating within the limits imposed by SCAQMD. Mr. Dawes further reported that staff then began an inspection of the other four flares and believes they are also in need of repair. The major work needed is to replace burners, which actually melted down due to excessive temperatures, and to modify certain controls which will change the air and digester gas mix and burning temperatures. SCAQMD is being requested to grant a second variance for the other flares. -20- 04/14/93 Mr. Dawes stated authority was being requested to hire the burner manufacturer, Sur-Lite Corporation, to do the repairs and to conduct monthly inspections.of the burners while they are in operation, for up to two years. It is expected that they will be taken out of service and placed in a standby mode before the two-year period is up as the central generation facilities should be brought on line by then. Following a brief discussion, the following actions were taken. Authorizing consideration of Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plant Nos 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of a supplemental agenda item relative to Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated April 8, 1993, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Sur-Lite Corporation for Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Sur-Lite Corporation in an amount not to exceed $129,400.00 for Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040. -21- 04/14/93 DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate a Professional Services That the Selection Committee be, and is Agreement with Boyle Enaineering hereby, authorized to solicit a proposal and Corporation for the preparation of negotiate a Professional Services Agreement plans and specifications for Contract with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the No. 7-23 preparation of plans and specifications for Gisler-Red Hill Parallel Force Main, from College Avenue Pump Station to Iowa Street, Contract No. 7-23. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. -22- 04/14/93 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: - Journment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies That the Selection Committee certification to design Contract No. 3-36R of the final negotiated fee relative to the Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies to design Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Mains (First and Second Unitsl, and New Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 3-36R, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-44-3, approving said agreement with The Keith Companies for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $85,683.00. ..✓ Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Actions pertaining to request to reduce sewer connection charges for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated April 7, 1993, re Request for Consideration of Reduced Connection charges for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -23- 04/14/93 Receive and file letter from Jan Development Co. reauesting reduction of connection charges Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from Jan Development Co. dated March 17, 1993, requesting reduction of connection charges for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file letter from District Chairman Sal Sapien requesting consideration of reduction of connection charges Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter four District Chairman Sal Sapien dated March 18, 1993, requesting consideration of a reduction of sewer connection charges for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Referring request to Fiscal Policy Committee Following a motion to have staff conduct a study on whether a reduction of connection charges for low income and/or senior citizen housing is appropriate, the General Counsel was asked to comment. Mr. Woodruff reported that this is not the first time that a request of this nature has been presented to the Districts, but none have been granted. There have been similar requests in several of the other Districts. He pointed out that the request is to reduce the sewer connection charges. These charges are established by ordinances that are adopted after a variety of procedural requirements have been satisfied. The ordinances have no provision for the waiver or modification of any charges. Mr. Woodruff pointed out that in order to effectively reduce the sewer connection charges, the Board would need to conduct hearings and process an ordinance amendment, which would probably include various findings that would have to be made in order to justify the amendment. -24- 04/14/93 He further advised that in the early 1970's and 1980's, the Districts received certain grant monies under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Hundreds of millions of dollars were received for the building of Plant 1 and Plant 2 facilities. One of the statutory requirements under federal law was that the Districts had to adopt a comprehensive revenue program. One component of that program was that there be an established uniform, fair and equitable levy of charges and assessments, and that all parties must pay on a fair and equitable basis. He stated that if one property owner was allowed to pay a lesser charge than all other owners in that area, the District could be found in violation of the requirement which might jeopardize the District's grant monies. The Directors then entered into a discussion regarding the equitability of connection charges, the financial impact on the District and other aspects of reducing charges for some properties, and the uniformity of fee policies among the several Districts. During the discussion the Chair also recognized Mr. Edward Czuker, Vice President of Jan Development Company, the project's developer, who addressed the Directors in support of his request for a sewer connection charge reduction. Following further discussion, a substitute motion was moved, seconded and duly carried that the issue of reducing sewer connection charges for low income and/or senior citizen housing be referred to the Fiscal Policy Committee for review and report back. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. 6 Assistant Siefitdry Althe Boards of Directors of County S nation istricts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 and 14 -25- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 3/G4/93 PAGE 1 PEP ORI NUMBLR AP 43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF GRAN 6E COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/16/93 RUST IN 0ATI uS/1L/93 i.l WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT ULSCPIPTION 1 , 128330 ASH BUSINESS MACHINES $044•8. SERVICE AGREEMENT i.__ 128331 _ AMERICAN TELEPHONE L 1ELE6RAPH IL.5.3.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 126332 ADVANCED EBOTRE TECH CORP 315.710.00 ENGINE TESTING SSRYICES M.0.11-18-92 i . 128333 AIR CDLD SOFTLY INC 171.70 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS 120334 ALFA-LAVAL INC $170.44 BOOR - " 128335- ALLIED SUPPLY CO $876.89 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES � .. 126336 BLAME P ANUERSON $144.91 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 128337 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 34.13tl.41 NOTICES 6 ADS 128336 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS INC $145.71 LAB SUPPLIES a.:, 128339 ABC LABORATORIES $235.90 LAB SERVICES 128340 ARATEA SERVICES INC 45,000.87 UNIFORM RENTALS 128341 ARMOR - VAC ie47.6u VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 128342 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC $494.15 WASTE HAULING FEES 128343 ART WORMS $18.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES ` - 120344 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $1,236.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 128345 AUTO SHOP EWUIPMENT CO 3506.43 TRUCK PARTS 128346 AWARDS 4 TROPHIES 3100.85 AWARDS 6 PLAQUES 128347 BFI PORTABLE SERVICES $85.31 - RENTAL EQUIPMENT X ® 128348 BKK LANDFILL $7.G63.64 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 S 128349 SRW SAFETY 3 SUPPLY $1.133.86 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128350 BAKER PLYWOOD CC INC 31.927.13 BUILDING MATERIALS �. 128351 BARCLAYS LAY PUBLISHERS $243.64 BOORS 128352 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $709.82 BATTERIES a 128353 SAUER COMPRESSOR $684.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES 126354 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 34.953.bl LAB SUPPLIES �. 128355 BEACH PAVING INC. 44,200.00 PAVING SERVICES 128356 DON C BEATTIE P.E. $200.60 MACHINE REPAIRS �. 128357 BELL SECURITY $15.766.50 TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES 128351 Y7 BILLARD INC $225:41 MACHINE REPAIRS 128359 - BI'SAFETY STETIMS. INC. 66837 - LAB SUPPLIES 128360 BISHOP COMPANY $212.45 TOOLS 128361 BUEHRINGER MANNHCIM $233.19 LAB SUPPLIES 128362 SOLER RADIATOR SERVICE 338.60 - - RADIATOR REPAIRS 0 I 128363 BOHNEMANN PUMPS. INC $22.903.26 PUMP PARTS 128364 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $35,973.85 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-20 126365 BRENNER-FIEDLER L ASSOC IN $173.41 PUMP PARTS V 128366 BKOOKLVN TNERMOMETLA CU IN 3109.55 LAR SUPPLIES 128367 BUILDER-S EMPORIUM $L9.49 HARDWARR/LUMBER 126368" THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFF 3465.00 SUBSCRIPTION ��. 128369 BURKE ENGINEERING CO ic34.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS 128370 GARY G SYNCED $5,308.13 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 126371 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY $708.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128372 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS. INL $3,381.53 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128373 IS COMPANY 91.357.2i VALVE PARTS 128374 1993 CYPCA CONFLKENCE $2.23i.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 128375 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO INC $237.69 CHEMICALS 0 FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROLESSIN6 DATE 3/C4/93 PAGE 2 ; L:,I REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CDUN TV CLAIMS FAID 03/10/93 POSTING DATE 03/10/93 V � WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION I 120376 CALTROL INC 35..BU.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 128377 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $312.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128378 JOHN CAROLED ENGINEERS 39.161.45 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36 128379 CENTURY SAFETY INST 6 SUPP s8.696.05 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128388 BRUCE CHAFMAN 45,300•00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 120381 CLARK CONSULTANTS $3.48C.4: CONSULTING SERVICES 128382 COLICH AND SONS $962,241.60 CONSTRUCTION I-9 128383 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER 3585.b9 2-WAY RADIO EQUIPMENT 126304 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS Of CA $3.136.78 PUMP PARTS 126385 COMPUSA, INC. 5274.57 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 128386 CONNELL 69 PANTS / DIV 350.91 TRUCK PARTS 126387 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4.926.73 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 12838E CONSULIOA7LD FREIbHTWAYS S452.bb FREIGHT CHARGES 124389 CONTINENTAL AIR IDOLS INC $2,724.04 TOOLS 1 128390 ' CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 61.616.25 CHLORINE I28391 CONTINENTAL GRAFHICS 3120.3. OFFICE SUPPLIES 128392 CONTROLCO s602.3N ELECTRIC PARTS 128393 COSTA MESA AUTO SUFFLY S5b4.24 TRUCK PARTS X , 128394 COSTAR DORF $288.77 LAB SUPPLIES _ 128395 COUNTY WHOLESALE LLECTRIC 459i.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 128396 CHARLES P CROWLEY CO $176.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS lb 128397 DML INC $1,364.67 ENGINE PARTS 126398 D 6 S CONVEYORS 11.332.60 CONVEYOR REPAIRS 126399 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 9468.58 TIRES y IS 128400 DAPPER TIRE $742.40 TIRES 1 126401 FLIER C DAVID CU $172.317.24 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2 n7 1284C2 PETER C DAVID CD S1O3.654.27 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2 128403 DEAVER MANUFACTURING CO. $327.05 TRUCK PARTS 128404 DECRA-TREND 3199.67 HARDWARE 128405 CC GUELLE 6 SONS GLASS CO S29.09 BUILDING MATERIALS 128406 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 33,750.51 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.6-12-92 128407 DIFILIPPO ASSUCIAILS $677.21 PRINTING 120408 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT COOP 3751.04 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 126489 SVCON CORP $137.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128416 DISCO PRINT LOMPANY $2.136.94 OFFICE FURNITURE 128411 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN $13:810.86 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 128412 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $44972.1E PLANT MAINTENANCE A REPAIRS 120413 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY 4620.09 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128414 OURO-SENSE CORP 3177.bB MECHANICAL PARTS 128415 EASTMAN INC 12,940.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 228416 ECOANALYSIS INC 6220.04 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 128417 ECONOMICS PRESS INC 32.704.60 PUBLICATIONS 12B41B EDUCATIONAL DCVELOPHENT SPLC 1659.66 EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS 128419 ELECT AIR TOOL CU $2.973.64 MECHANICAL PARTS 128420 ELECTRU DYNAMIC SERVICES $3,220.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ELECTRICAL 128421 INCH AN TEA 1 $4.480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 / 1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL Pk OLLSSINN DATE 3/U4/93 PAGE 3 -,4 REFORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID E3/]O/93 POSTING DATE 63/14/93 I! Y AR0.ANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 128422 ESSENCE GROUP $399.21 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 128423 CHARLES EVANS L ASSOC. S112,041.00 LAB SERVICES M.0.11-I8-92 128424 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICL $3,640.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 128425 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP 396.60 AIR FREIGHT - �. 128426 FISCHER Y PORTER CO 55.253.6b CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 128427 FISHER SCIENIIFIC CO 68r6U4.27 LAB SUPPLIES 128428 FISONS INSTRUMENTS 5262.91 LAB SUPPLIES 128429 FLO-SYSTEMS $5,296.07 PUMP PARTS 128436 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS s126.Lu PUMP PARTS 128431 FLUID TECH $956.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES ,., 128432 FOLSOM LAKE FORD $10,506.24 VEHICLE M.O.4-8-92 128433 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 5705.63 FILM 128434 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $243.41 PAINT SUPPLIES 128435 FOR INDUSTRIAL SALES 5170.12 MECHANICAL PARTS 228436 THE FOXBORO CO 33,744.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS 128437 FREEDOM IMAGING $57.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128438 CITY OF FULLERTON s25.53 WATER USE m 128459 GANAHL LUMBER CU $2.128.77 HARDWARE X 128440 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1,943.81 CHEMICALS 128441 GALES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS sl.bG0.0u PUMP PARTS 128442 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 31.021.5E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ' 128443 GENERAL TELEPHONE CU 3224.30 TELEPHONE SERVICES j RE 128444 LIFE TECHNOLOGILS/618CO/BHL $168.76 LAB SUPPLIES n 128445 GIERLICH-MIICHLLL INC $4.416.54 MECHANICAL PARTS • 128446 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTOKS a330.80 FILM W 120447 DUN GREEK 3 ASSOCIATES $2,245.O, SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 128448 - HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO $875.3V TRUCK PARTS 128449 HACH COMPANY 51.696.09 LAB SUPPLIES 128450 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTI 5136.43 SCRUBBER PARTS ' 128451 PC HAWN CO INC $302.09 ELECTRIC PARTS _ 126452 HOEMBIGER CVS CALIF INC 5586.29 COMPRESSOR PARTS 128453 RS HUGHES CO INC 42,709.25 PAINT SUPPLIES 128454 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11.032.50 WATER USE 128455 HUNTINGTON BEACH HUBBEG STA S10.bb OFFICE SUPPLIES 120456 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL SJ6.55U.66 FERRIC CHLORIDE H.O.11-18-92 120457-"" INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION HUYTHS 4133.00 EDGED TV 12845N INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SHOE CO. 33.595.Lb SAFETY SHOES 128459 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $668.56 CONNECTORS 128440 INGRAM PAPER $1,266.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128461 IRVINE RANCH ATER DISTRICT S160.94 WATER USE 128462 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY $OPP 5685." JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 228463 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO $105.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS . 128464 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $156.43 ELECTRIC PARTS 120465 JONES CHEMICALS INC 62,165.69 CHEMICALS ` .. 120466 JORDAN CONTROLS INC $78.46 INSTRUMENT 128467 KELLY PIPE CO $737.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING TAIL 3/64/93 PAGE 0 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OE ORANGE COUNTY .� CLAIMS PAID 63/14193 POSTING DATE 03/14/93 �I WARRANT NO. YLNDUR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION /? 12P068 KING BEARING INC $4,234.14 MACHINE SUPPLIES 228469 KNOX INUUbTRIAL SUPPLIL4 11.398.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128470 MARTIN KOROICK SR 52.841.9G CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 128471 LA IRONIC$ 5416.19 CAMERA 126472 LAYMAN. JONES 6 DYE. LAWYERS $1.615..5 LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER INDUSTRIES 228473 LEGI-TECH s320.11O COMPUTER SERVICES 128474 LECO CORPORATION $962.99 LAB SUPPLIES 128475 LEWCO ELECTRIC Cu s3a4.6E TRUCK PARTS 128676 - ' LIEBERT CORPORATION $364.14 FREIGHT 126477 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 5139.904.LL POOLED EMIR. ESTIM. PLAN H.O.12-13-89 12897E NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $933.33 OCEAN MONITORING 128479 MPS 51b.96 PHOTOGRAPHIC 3ERVICE8 12868E MACOMCO 6320.bb SERVICE AGREEMENT 128481 AA6NETEN NATIONAL LLECTRIL 31,657.13 ELECTRIC PARTS 126482 MAN T IN 6323.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 126483 MARVAC ELECTRONICS a150.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 120484 MATT - CHLOR INC $7.856.96 VALVE PARTS RI 128485 MCCOV SHEET METAL MONKS IN 3189.64 ELECTRIC PARTS X 128466 MICNOAGE of CENR/TUS $3.527.14 COMPUTER SOFTWARE = 128487 MIDWAY MFG A NACHININ4 $2.370.50 MECHANICAL PARTS 128408 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES 3190.82 FITTINGS � . 1284999 MISSION INDUSTRIES $1,724.64 SAFETY SUPPLIES I2P190 MTTC HELL INSTRUMENT CO 3969.60 ELECTRIC PARTS 128391 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION s197.106.66 CONSTRUCTION 2-30 Om • 128392 NATIONAL FIRE PNOTLCTIOU AS 1509.22 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128693 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICLS INC s750.0U VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE8 128494 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL •138.70 SAFETY FILM RENTALS . 128495 CITY OF NLWPORI BEACH 32a.2u WATER USE 128496 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICLS 3515.51 SAFETY GLASSES 128497 THE ONMAR7 CORP $1,292.15 INSTRUMENT PARTS 12B490 D1 SISTLM$ CO 334.♦61.Ob CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 128499 ORACLE CORP OX AT ION 3100.Gs TRAINING REGISTRATION 120500 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL $131.59 ELBC7 RIC SUPPLIES 120501 ORANGE COAST PETROLEUM LLUIF 3340.66 TRUCK PARTS 128502 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO TANIS C $61.20 TRUCK PARTS 128503 ORANGE COURIER $267.0C FREIGHT ' 128504 ORANGE VALVE t fl ill6G CO. $1.229.22 FITTINGS 128505 ORGANON TEKNIKA S1u2.36 LAB SUPPLIES 128506 OR"El TONP $1.842.10 PUMP PARTS 121507 OKYGEN SLRYICL fa.041.90 SPECIALTY GASES 128508 COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICT 31.900.14 WORKERS COMP INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT 128509 PSI s1S3.62 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 128510 PSSI 31.32b.50 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 125511 FACIFIC FARTS S449.31 INSTRUMENT 128512 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 51.195.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129513 PACIFIC BELL 3453.1E TELEPHONE SERVICE8 f e FUND NO 9159 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROLESSIN4 DATE 3/W4/93 PAGE 5 RLPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COON TT CLAIMS PAID u3/10193 POSTING DATE 03/19/13 LI 'I WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION G; - 128514 PACIFIC PATEN CONDITIONIND C $68.96 RENTAL EQUIPMENT W _ 122515 PACTLL MER101AN SYSTLMS 51.627.:. TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 128526 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPP $2,492.79 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 120517 PAX WEST $1.13208 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 128518 PALMIERI, TILER, WILNER, SM63.65 LEGAL SERVICES 14-1-1A 120519 PARAGON CABLE L36.78 CABLE SERVICES 12tl520 PERXIN-LLMER CORPORATION i5u1.15 LAB SUPPLIES 128521 PIINkT BOWES 4530..4 SERVICE AGREEMENT ` 125522 PITNEY BOWLS CPEUII LORP 5183.18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 128523 POLYMETH ICS. INC. 31.436.U5 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128524 POLYFURE INC 51/.268.19 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 128525 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO $161.75 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 9 228526 PRECISION GLASS 'LOVING 3228.40 LAB SUPPLIES 128527 HAROLD PA IMF OS F. ICL $126.00 ICE 128528 THE FROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $4,960.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 120529 RPM ELECTRIC M07UKS 32.330.83 ELECTRIC PARTS 128530 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO 43.138.82 TRASH REMOVAL 128531 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO $121.47 LAB SUPPLIES X 0 128532 RECYC INC $29 a61.95 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.G.3-13-91 _ 128433 REMOTE LILA RESETTING. SY'S/ 55.000.00 POSTAGE 128534 COMMUNITY BUSINESS WRAPHICS S1c5.10 PRINTING TA 128535 NCJUNKIN-REFUSLIC SUPPLY 61.926.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 128536 RESEARCH FROOUCIS IN T. CORP $73.96 LAB SUPPLIES 128537 REYES ENUINELRINL CO 34.868.75 HARDWARE y Ap 12853E RICH COLOR LAD $29.63 PRINTING I 128539 ROCKWELL E114INLERIN6 L EWUIF S1H52.60 MACHINE PARTS LP 120540 RODNEY-HUNT CO 13.733.54 BAR SCREEN PARTS 128541 ROSEMOUNT INC. 5929.69 ELECTRIC PARTS 128542 RTAN-HERCO $4,608.73 ELECTRIC METER 128543 SAFETY-XLEEN CORP 12,653.61 PARTS CLEANER 128544 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1,132.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 128545 SANVA DANK 4b3.0I2.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30 126546 DOUG SARVIS 61,125.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 126547 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INPL $31i.658.55 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 126548 SCIMED A CORP )156.50 LAB SUPPLIES 128549 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES INC 5733.7H SAFETY SUPPLIES 128550 SEA COAST DESIGNS SL.6L5.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128551 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 5723.U6 LAB SUPPLIES 128552 SNASTA ELECTRIC S1C.593.UJ OFFICE EQUIPMENT � . 120553 SHURFLUCK SALES $2,143.12 HARDWARE 126554 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION 5397.50 LAB SUPPLIES -' - 128555 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO 4269.09 LAS SUPPLIES 128556 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI $864.6G PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 228557 SLIDE MASTER $77.58 PRESENTATION AIDS 125558 SMITH PIPE S SUPPLY INC Si75.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 128559 SO COAST AIN QUALITY $15.056.00 PERMIT FEES 7 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3104/93 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 _ _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Si CLAIMS FAID 43/10/93 POSTING DATE 63/16/93 • WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT Ut SCPIPi ION ' � • 128560 SCAOMD UPDATE TRAINING i125.L.. TRAINING REGISTRATION 128561 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 525.696.82 POWER 120562 SO CAL GAS CD $40,604.67 NATURAL OA8 126563 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CU $1,314.86 DIESEL FUEL ., 128564 SOUVENIR PHOTO $19.55 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 120565 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2.25 DRINKING WATER/COOLBR RENTALS 126566 SPARLIN4 INSTRUMENT CO INC i2.969.15 METER 128567 STAMEN 2 SPASSOff FL 35.950.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-29-182 129568 YESTALLOY INC 91.043.35 HARDWARE 128569 SPEAKER SUPPORT $72.73 PRESENTATION AIDS 128570 SPEK INDUSTRIES INC . 3579.39 LAB SUPPLIES -' 126571 SACCO FLEAIBLE $484.96 TRUCK PARTS 128572 STANCO.S VACUUM SERVCE 31.072.57 VANUM TRUCK SERVICES 128573 JAMES STANFILL CONSTRUCTION i1000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 128574 STEMMERS THEE SERVICE $600.00 LANDSCAPING 128575 SUNN IT STEEL 4984.84 METAL 128576 SUPELCO INC 9103.31 LAB SUPPLIES 12857T SUPER CHEM COOP 32.L4A.iy CHEMICALS X * 128575 SUPER ICE CORP 382.82 LAB SUPPLIES = 128579 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMPANY $920.33 TRUCK PARTS 128500 TECH SYSTEMS $211.53 TRUCK PARTS CD 12BSB1 CM AR LES E THOMAS 3818.21 TRUCK PARTS 128582 THUN PEON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 31.968.24 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 128583 TDNY.S LOCH A SAFE SLRVI CC 4268.71 KEYS AND LOCKS Oa , 128584 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL 3479.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES I 128585 TUTU LANDSCAPING CO 37.238.77 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.11-13-91 128586 WESTRONICS 3125.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES . 120587 TRAVEL EXECUTIVLS 3138.40 TRAVEL SERVICES 128565 TRAVEL TRAVEL $143.00 TRAVEL SERVICES 128589 TRUCK E AUTO SUPPLY INC $1,552.66 TRUCK PARTS 128590 JG TUCKER A SON INC $2.507.67 INSTRUMENT 120591 UHLER. INC S1U2.065.65 CONSTRUCTION 5-32 126592 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $269.09 LAB SUPPLIES d 128593 UNOCAL $121.52 UNLEADED GASOLINE 128594 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $400.30 PARCEL SERVICES - 12S595 DATAVAULT 0 S SAFE DEPOSIT LO. 31.405.LL COMPUTER DATA STORAGE 12859E VG/F1SIONS INSTRUMENTS $9,299.53 LAB EQUIPMENT 128597 VYR SCIENTIFIC $6,979.67 LAB SUPPLIES 128599 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 46.678.47 PLUMBING PARTS I „ 120599 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS 3696.VT OFFICE SUPPLIES 128600 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $164.29 LAB SUPPLIES 128601 VARNCR ACOUSTICS. INC. Sl.4C5.44 BUILDING MATBRIALS . 128f C2 VAUGHAN COMPANY $4,961.25 PUMP PARTS 128603 VERNE-S PLUMBING 3230.0L PLUMBING SERVICES 16 12860R VERTEX SYSTEMS $8,037.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT i 128E G5 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL f19.91 BOOK FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PhOCESSING GATE 3/04/93 PAGE 7 N EPURT NUMNLR AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF URAN6E 'COON TY � CLAIMS PAID 03/16/93 POSTING DATE 43/14/93 ,I WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 3ESCAIPTION ^, 126606 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEU. $29.69 PUBLICATION -•i 126607 WESTERN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY 43.1b6.69 MRCMARICAL REPAIRS ' 128688 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY Si4.982.90 CAUSTIC SODA 14.0.8-12-92 128609 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY $110.42 PUBLICATION 126610 WITE6 4515.7E LAB SUPPLIES 128611 - ROURKE S WGDDRUFF S ON 156,152.50 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 120612 XEROX COOP s1V.G09.39 COPIER LEASES 126613 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $642.74 VALVES - - 228614 GEORGE YARDLEY CO S356.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 128615 JOHNSON YOKOGAVA CORP $868.63 CHART PAPER .. 128616 ZIEPARTH S ALPER/C.S. ALPER $16,096.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 . _ . ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 03/10/93 S3.073.814.9b SUMMARY AMOUNT X ! R2 OPER FUND $404.99 _ N2 CAP PAC PUSH) $332,365.00 t R3 OVER FUND $25,267.36 03 CAP PAC FUND $275,982.51 1 _ R5 OVER FWD $2,026.94 a 05 CAP FAC FUND $82,968.05 07 OVER EDGE) $4,029.23 V 07 CAP FAC FUND $36,069.89 012 OPEN FUND $821.30 011 CAP PAC FUND $328.00 014 OFOR FUND $66.00 424 CAP FAC FUND $863.85 j 0586 OPBR FUND $4,079.98 056E CAP FAC FUND $19,142.95 ' 0667 OPER FUND $2,303.10 47614 OVER FUND $7,747.69 JT OVER FUND $677,448.08 -" CORP $1,421,117.67 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $1,988.14 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $179,797.23 a. $3,073,824.97 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WURKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3118/93 PAGE 1 { li REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF 0RANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATE 03/24/93 .JAI WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 120651 46 TECH COMPANY $107.149.99 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.10-9-91 128652__ A T 6 T 53.820.73 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES . 128653 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC $150.00 LAB SERVICES 128654 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES $420.60 CHILLER REPAIRS 128655 AIR PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL IN 634.1164.6, OAK AGREEMENT CRY. GEN. SYST M.O.8-9-8! _ 128656 ALLIED SUPPLY CO 51.258.15 VALVE so 128657 AMBER STEEL COMPANY f6U.0O PLAN 6 SPECS REFUND 128658 _ AMERICAII TYFE CULTURE COLLLLIN $99.75 LAB SUPPLIES 128659 - - AMENSHAM CORP $326.70 LAB SUPPLIES 128660 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 3664.01, EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS - DIST 7 �••_ _ 126661 ANIATER - DISTRIBUTION $426.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES - 128662 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL 6230.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128663 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 1374.79 NOTICES 6 ADS 128664 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS INC $4,649.73 LAB SUPPLIES _. . _ 126665 ACS UPPLIEO COMPUTER SOLUTION $145.68 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 128666 ABC LAB ORA TOF IES 31.395.00 LAB SUPPLIES �•/ 128661 _ ARATEK SERVICES INC $2.56 UNIMPRI SERVICE m 12866E ANENS INDUSTRIES INC 33.643.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES >< 120669 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT f2.E91.Ji INSTRUMENT 120670 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC 9450.U0 - WASTE HAULING PEE tz 128671 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERY. $130.00 MASTS OIL REMOVAL 1p'. 128672 ARIA 512.803.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES M.0.1-13-92. _ 128673 _ ATCHISON TOPEKA 6 SANTA FL MR $150.00 SUPPLY AGREEMENT t" 126674- AUTOMATIC DATA PRGCLSSIN6 $7.553.25 PAYROLL PROCESSING SERVICES 1 94 128675 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC $518.29 TRUCK PARTS 1-- 129676 BKK LANDFILL 32.766.46 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.30-9-91 _ 128677' - ERN SAFETY 8 SUPPLY 347.05 SAFETY SUPPLIES �~ 128678 BANANA BLUEPRINT $15.465.79 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES 128679 BANK GF AMERICA $1,203.67 _ DEFERRED COMP TRANSFER _ 128680 - BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS $177.26 PUBLICATION 126681 B BATEMAN 0675.U0 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION _ 128692 BAITLRY SPECIALTIES $546.16 BATTERIES 128683 - BAUER COMPRESSOR 3190.64 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS' " i . 126684 BARTER DIA6M06TICS INC $7,412.66 LAB SUPPLIES 120665 _ BEACH PAVING INC. 619.775.U6 _ PAVING SERVICES 126661 - BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS 69.347.38 LAB SUPPLIES 128681 BELL SECURITY $3.888.75 TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES 128688 010-PAD LABORATORIES $161.07 LAB SUPPLIES 120689 BIOR E CLARA 110N SYXPOSIUN $550.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION ��. 128690 BORNEMANN PUMPS. INC $12.810.6: PUMPS • 1_ _ ___12869! BOVLE ENGINEERING CURP $5,099.35 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-19 128692 BRLNNER-FIEULER 6 ASSOC IN $212.67 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 128693 bRITHINEE LLECTRIG 91.026.59 ELECTRIC PARTS 128694 BROWN AUTOMATION $2.272.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS L -- 120695 _- - BUILDERS EMPORIUM 6201.26 HARDWAR6/LUMBER 128696 BURKE ENGINEERING CO $774.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CUUNTV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �r CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATE 63/24/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION II � 128697 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC 312.148.OJ SURVEY SERVICES RKS S-051 i.� 120698 BUSINESS LAWS INC $53.00 BOOK _ 128699 GARY G STREED 52.35b.84 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 128700 CRC PRESS INC $87.45 BOOKS 128701 CS COMPANY $4,248.10 VALVE 128702 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC Sbb%.85 TRUCK PARTS 40 128743 CALIF SOCIETY OP MUNILIPAL S85.O6 MEMBERSHIP DUBS __.._ 1287G4 CARLETON ENGINEERS 611.326.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 120705 CENTURY SAFETY INST S SUPP S2.651.65 SAFETY SUPPLIES 122TOG CHURCH ENGINEERING INC $5.109.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-RI 128707 COLE-PARKER INSTRUMENT CO $344.53 LAB SUPPLIES 128708 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA ss.078.56 MECHANICAL PARTS 128709 COMPUSA. INC. S987.85 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 128714 CONNiLL GM PARTS / DIY 3120.38 TRUCK PARTS 126721 - CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL UIST $12.025.29 ELECTRIC PARTS - - 128712 CONTINENTAL AIR IDOLS INC $5,346.39 TOOLS 128713 CONTROL CABLES INC S196.67 TRUCK PARTS 128714 - CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $5,740.63 CONSULTING SERVICES X 128715 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS s1.271dO TRUCK PARTS _ _ 126726 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW MAINT. $2.250.D0 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES _ 128717 CAL POLY KELL06G UNIT $215.50 TRAINING RBGISTMTION IA4 12STIS STATE WATER RESOURCES CO6Tk OL $6.72 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEES 128719 DAILY PILOT 640.u0 NOTICES 6 ADS —1 - 128720 J.Y. D'ANGELO CO INC $7,515.57 PIPE 128721 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.06 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 128722 DEAVER MANUFACTURING CO. $19.84 TRUCK PARTS N - 128T23 DELTA TECH SERVICE INC 314.008.85 HIGH VOLUME OIL FLUSH IN 126724 DE2URIK AND/OM CS CO 311,260.35 VALVE 198725 DIFILIP'PO ASSOCIATLS $2,395.58 _ PRINTING 128726 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 49.953.60 - SERVICE AGREEMENT 126727 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN S1.774.51 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 128728 DORADO ENTERPRISLS INC $11,582.99 _ PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 128729 -" ROBERT'F DRIVER ASSOC 320.D00.00 INSURANCE DEPOSIT '! 128730 DUNN EDWARDS CORP $787.72 PAINT SUPPLIES _128731 EASTMAN INC S4.659.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES _ 126732 ECOANALYSIS INC S5.OB1.09 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 128733 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES $3,680.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - ELECTRICAL 128734 EMED S67.5B SAFETY SUPPLIES - - 128735 ENCHANTER INC 35..40.00 OCEAN MONITORING 6-10-92 128736 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC $862.00 LAB SERVICES 12673T MARSHALL FAIRRLS 5128.L8 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128738 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 15.200.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 r♦ 128739 FEDERAL LKPkLSS CORP 4185.75 AIR FREIGHT 128740 FERKELLGAS 4122.58 PROPANE 128741 FISCHER A PORTER CO $6,782.68 CHLORINATION PARTS 228742 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO S.7.635.45 LAB SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PRDCESSIN6 DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 3 ; .• REPORT NUMBER AP43 I` COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICTS OF ORAN6E COUNTY !d CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATE 63/24/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 128743 FISONS INSTRUMENTS 5126.64 LAB SUPPLIES 128199.. FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. f159.0u CONCRETE CUTTING _ •i - 120796 FLO-SYSTEMS $8,157.46 MECHANICAL PARTS 128146 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS s76.05 PUMP PARTS 128747 FLUID TECHNOLOGIES $265.25 OIL TESTING SERVICES 126746 CLIFFORD A FORKLRT $6.412.25 SURVEYING SERVICE SPEC 9-051 oll 128749 FOSS MARITIME CO $1,061.66 JANITORIAL SERVICES 128750 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $299.78 FILM 128751 FOUNTAIN VALLEY - PAINT 1243.87 PAINT SUPPLIES Amp. 128152 BUD FRET $21.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 220753 CITY OF FULLERTON $30.6. WATER USE -128754 GANAHL LUMBER CO $301.98 LUMBER/NARDWARE i 128755 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS 16.963.56 PIPE 120756 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 9172.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 120757 - GENERAL TELEPHONE CO 44.554.65 TELEPHONE SERVICES 128758 TOM GERLINGER ab.000.ou DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 128759 _ N GLANT2 6 SON $26.96 PAINT SUPPLIES 128760 - GOVaT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $355.06 MEMBERSHIP DUES fYl 126761 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $233.23 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES X 12ST62 _ GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $5.626.25 FILM 2 r- 128763 - HSU TECHNOLOGY $152.624.88 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2 w 128769 FRED A HARPER 31,500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128765 __ _ HARE IN610N INGO$TRIAL PLASTI .1,682.68 VALVE 1 i.f 126T66 BASCO OIL CO INC S147.40 OIL 6 GREASE A 128767 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS 11.620.Oa CONTAINER RENTALS _ 128760 _ PL HAWN CO INC $1.940.36 FILTERS ' -�-- 124770 - - HEW1E HAYCOCK CKA .111.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT - - lN Y' 128771 HEYLE T7 PACKARD f1$197.78 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128771 __ HILTI INC 5197.7E TOOLS CK �• 126773 MI STANDARDAUTOMOTIVE 181.89 TRUCK PARTS _ 126773 HOCNHUSHE CVO CALIF INC 5125.75 COMPRESSOR PARTS 12P771 _ RS ER CORPORATION CO INC ".590.75 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES �. 128716 HUNTER CORPORATION f159.$27.80 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 +,. 128777 HUNTINGTON BEACH HOUSES SCHWI SlA 130.13 OFFICE 9UPPLIEB _ 126777 RUNT IN4TON PALLET SCMYINM L a130.50 INSTRUMENTATION PARTS -- 126779 ISC 39.O28.SU - INSTRUMENTATION CONSULTING 128780 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL i69.$95.3C FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.I1-18-92 120781 INDUSTRIAL TMNEAOEO PRODUCTS 260.03 CONNECOFFICETORS UP -' 129782 - INTERN PAPER - $280.33 - OFFICE SUPPLIER _. 120783 JLAINTERSTATE BATTERY SYS TE NS 11.087.3V BATTERMICROFIEB �.. _ 128784 JLA CREDIT CORP f195.32 MICROFICHE: READER LEASE 128789 6ALAT WESTERN SANITARY SVhP $393.38 JANITORIAL MEETINGS 128786 JENSE CATERING 3910.. HIRDCTORB' MEETING EXPENSE 196787 _ JENSEN SUSPENSION INSTRUMENTS CO 5$50.33 TRUCKHARDWARE 129708 - JAMS SBEARINGS I VICE 392.56 TRUCE REPAIRS ""- -- �F 12818E KAM AN BEARINGS • SUPPLY 592.Stl INeTRVNeNT SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING, CAPITAL PROCESSING DAIL 3/18/93 PAGE 4 i Ul REPOhT NUMBER AP43 .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ONAN6E COUNTY AEI CLAIMS PAID 63/24/93 POSTING DAIL u3/14193 WARRANT NO. VENDOR ANOINT DESCRIPTION 11..i 126765 KARCHER INSULATION INC $1.900.06 !.` 128190 KEENAN A ASSOCIATES $2.475.60 ELECTRIC PARTS 129791 KING BEARING INC S4.452.41 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1 . 120792 KNOW INDUSTRIAL SUPPLILS $4.423.11 MACHINE SUPPLIES 128793 MARTIN KOROICK SN $2,900.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128794 LA CELLULAh TELEPHONE CO 869.4E CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 r 128795 LEE L RO CONSULTING LN4N $11.306.24 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 126796 KP LINDSTROM INC 64.932.b0 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5 128797 SOLO-LYNCH CORP 6156.26 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 122798 MPS 42b1.64 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 126799 MAC00NALD-STEPMENS LAB $11.210.00 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 128800 MACOMCO S520.65 LAB SERVICES 128801 MARVAC ELECTRUNILS S62.6S SERVICE AGREEMENT 126862 MATT CHLOR INC 67.164.32 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -4 - 128803 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS $41.72 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 228804 MICRO NOTION S1.431.27 LAB SUPPLIES 128805 MIDWAY MFU B MACHINING $12.647.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES . 128806 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES Cu 4a25.82 BUILDING REPAIRS 128867 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES 6472.41 SAFETY SUPPLIES _ ! 128008 JAMES M MONTGOMERY 41u2.721.9b WELDING SUPPLIES 128609 ON MONTGDMERY ENGINEERS $3.124.28 ENGINEERING SERVICES H.0.12-12-90 228810 TON MOORE $3.975.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES 120811 NATIONAL PLANT SERYICLS INC S1.567.54 CONSULTING SERVICES 128812 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 469.35 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES Lb , 128E 13 NENARK ILEC IRUNICS 6126.b4 SAFETY FILM RENTAL J- ' 128814 OCR REPROGRAPHICS INC 6121.22 ELECTRIC PARTS 126815 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERYICLS SIG5.44 LAB SUPPLIES - 128B16 OFFICE PAVILION/INTENIUN WES 47.Ob2.b9 SAFETY GLASSES _ 128817 DX SYSTEMS CO S29.633.42 OFFICE PARTITIONS 128818 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL $36.71 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 128819 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C 6344.9b ELECTRIC SUPPLIES _ 12RE20 OMANGE COUNTY FARM SUFPLY C 478.96 TRUCK PARTS 128821 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. S1.444.27 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES i:• 128822 OXYGEN SERVICE 62.611.01 FITTINGS 1266.3 COUNTY SANITA7ION DISTRICT S3.6I1.17 SPECIALTY GASSES 128324 CSOOC SELF-FU14UED MEDICAL I 6240.006.60 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION j 126825 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 67.bB7.39 PREMIUM ADVANCE 128826 R06ERi L CITRON 6108.66 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT 128827 PACIFIC PARTS 33.931.41 92/93 PROPERTY TAX 128828 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 5876.83 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES �• 12BR 29 PACIFIC BELL SS1.68 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128830 PACIFIC VATER CONDITIONING C 36B.40 TELEPHONE SERVICES 128831 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSILMS $429.19 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 120632 PRUKL JANITORIAL SUPP 6462.72 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 12SO33 PAGLNET $67.5. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES !' 128834 PAK VEST 9547.10 PAGER RENTAL �• JANITORIAL SUPPLIES A r` FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE 311E I93 PALL 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY LLAIMS PAID U:/24/93 POSTING DATE 03/24/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION !! IR8835 FARKSON CONPUNATION $644.51 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 128836 PARTS UNLIMITED 11.550.7i TRUCK PARTS 128837 STEVE PELLETIER 68.500.V6 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 128630 ROY PENDER6RAFT 4460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128839 PERKIN-ELMLR CUhPURATION 35.469.53 LAB SUPPLIES 128840 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS INC 1195,885.44 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.5-8-91 128041 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $69.88 HARDWARE 126642 POLVPURE INC >28.133.65 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-I1-92 120043 PORVENE ROLL-A-DOOR 3127.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 128044 POWER ELECTXO SUPPLY CO 1136.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 128845 PRECISION INDUSTRIES $402.22 HARDWARE 120046 PRESENTATION Pk00UCTS 3806.Bi OFFICE SUPPLIES 128847 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $04.06 ICE 128648 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 43.100.60 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 128849 STEVE P. IlOOS. INC. S163.809.00 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A-2 125850 RED WING SM 0E5 362b.77 SAFETY SHOES 128851 REDI EXPRESS $92.95 MESSENGER SERVICES 128652 THE RE6IS7ER 31.357.2G NOTICES 6 ADS m 126853 REMUTL METER RLSLTTING SYSI 35.G00.00 POSTAGE X 128854 COMMUNITY BUSINESS GRAPHICS 6112.3b PRINTING 128655 -- MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY 34.U61.2G PLUMBING SUPPLIES l'!J 128656 ROBBINS SCIENTIFIC $3.012.05 LAB EQUIPMENT 128857 J R ROBERTS CORP 6135.2TD.38 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 128858 ROSEMOUNT INC. $949.84 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 128659 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL $1,167.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 128860 ARNOLD S RUMMELSBURG. G.E. $2.183.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES VT 120861 PEGGY SILCOX 3540.U0 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128862 RUSSELL-S COMET. CO. 2300.00 CONSTRUCTION 120863 JOSEPH T RYERSON G SUN IN $629.46 STEEL 128864 SKC WEST $977.5b SAFETY SUPPLIES 128865 SAFETY YLST 3288.31 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128866 SANOFI DIAGNOSTICS PASTEUR $456.70 LAB SUPPLIES 128867 SANTA FE BAG CO 1242.4b BUILDING SUPPLIES �- 128868 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $765.03 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 120869 SEA COAST DESIGNS $412.57 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 128870 SNURELUCK SALES 17.026.26 HARDWARE 128871 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION $102.74 LAB SUPPLIES 126872 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO $345.08 LAB SUPPLIES 128B73 SKYPARM WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI 52.923.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 128E 74 SMITH FIRE WALK; SUPPLY INC 637.0E PLUMBING BUPPLIEB 128875 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $5.597.00 PERMIT FEES 120876 SO CALIF CUASTAL WATER 1c95.558.0U BCCWRP M.O.5-8-91 128877 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 3241.6b0.41 POWER 126078 SO CAL GAS CO 62.376.23 NATURAL GAS _ 4. 128079 $O CALIF WATER CO $36.96 WATER USE - - 128880 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CU 65.170.88 DIESEL/UNLEADED• MEL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YURKINO CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 . .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY \I •I CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATE 63/24/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 128881 SPAMKLETTS DRINKING WATER 61.871.BG DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 128002 NESTALLOY INC $179.78 STEEL 12SB83 SPEAKER SUPPORT f69.65 PRESENTATION AIDS 128089 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCL SYS 13.G29.16 TRAINING REGISTRATION 128885 STERLING ART 190.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128886 STEVENS PUBLISHING CORP S.99.44 SUBSCRIPTION 128807 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO $88.43 TOOLS _ 128BB8 TCN ASSOCIATES $1,106:69 LAB SUPPLIES . ' 128889 TAYLOR-DO AN All ' COMPANY A213 61 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 128890 THOX PEON IN DO S1,IAL SUPPLY $69.48 HARDWARE 128691 TRANSMATION INC $323.03 PUMP PARTS 126892 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $ 945.U0 TRAVEL SERVICES 128093 TRAVEL TRAVEL $V81.60 TRAVEL SERVICES 128894 ., TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY INC SIB4.11 TRUCK PARTS 128895 J6 TUCKER B SON INC 1637.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS 128096 TUSTIN DODGE $23.45 TRUCK PARTS r 128897 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $1.728.06 LAB SERVICES 128898 UNITED INDUSTRIAL TINE $442.91 TRUCK PARTS X 128899 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $209.81 PARCEL SERVICES 128900 VNR SCIENTIFIC, 95,394.11 LAB SUPPLIES 126901 VALIN CORPORATION i1.591.T1 FILTER 128902 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO S1.178.69 PLUNGING SUPPLIES 128903 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS 461.49 PRINTING 1 1289C9 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $293.58 LAB SUPPLIES t" A 128905 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 313.650.29 CAUSTIC SODA N.0.8-12-92 1 _ 128906 VESTAVA INTERNATIONAL $68.74 TRUCK PARTS 120907 WHESSDE VAREC S1i6.99 FREIGHT 128908 VILLDAN ASSOCIATLS S21.352.61 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-31 120909 _ ROURKE L WOODRUFF 6 OR 199.629.66 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 128910 AEROX CORP f9.168.65 COPIER LEASES 128911 GEORGE YARDLEY CU - 5126.95 VALVES 129912 NORMAN E CULVER 1239.45 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128913 RICHARD B EDGAR 1200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 126914 ROBERT M MAIN $116.06 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAIL t3/C4/93 1L.627,461.02 i FUND NO 9199 - JT DIRT WORKING CAPITAL PROCES3ING DATE 03/18/93 PAGE 7 DISTRICTS REPORT NUMBER A 93 COUNTY SANITATION /24/93 POSTING DATEE03/29 93 SUMMARY AMOUNT .� Np1 OPEN FUND {6.70 XI CAP FAC FUND $58,631.00 92 OPER FUND $3,916.94 2 CAP FAC FUND 031r 731.68 3 OPBR FUND 11�197.01 3 CAP FAC FUND 2:193.70 5 OPER FOND 5726.59 65 CAP FAC FUND 13:024.00 6 OPER FUND t29.51 8 7 OPER FOR 6 79.09 7 CAP FAC FUND 6:368.52 pIII OPER FUND 2,325.20 11 814 CAP FAC FUND 8 5,943.50 586 OPEN FUND 3.50 586 CAP FAC FOND 13,163.18 8JT OPER FOND 9 7.467.70 WAY 763,188.02 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS 219.122.16 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 483,025.16 137 $2,627,461.02 X vavaav aea W I V t .� 1 1 ' REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN 5-12-93 1 ) Presentation of Pride Suggestion Awards At its last meeting, the Fiscal Policy Committee approved ten Pride cost-saving or safety suggestion awards to employees, totaling $4,856.30. The ten Pride proposals are estimated to save approximately $62,035 annually. Tonight we would like to recognize an employee who received the maximum $ 1500 for his suggestion. I would like to ask his Department Head, Bob Ooten, to introduce the employee and give a brief summary of the suggestion. Dale Sparks: Pride No. 267 - Condensate U-Tube Drain Traps. Present certificate and check. -Item 2 on Next Page- 2) Upcoming Meetings A. Fiscal Policy Committee - The Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 19th, at 5:30 p.m. B. Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Ocean Monitoring - The Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Ocean Monitoring is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 26th, at 4:30 p.m., (immediately preceding the Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees meeting). C. Executive Committee/Fiscal Policy Committee - The Executive and Fiscal Policy Committees are scheduled to meet on Wednesday. May 26th, at 5 :30 p.m. Invite two of the following Directors to attend and participate in the discussions: Victor Leipzig and Thomas Lutz -or- Eva Miner or Maria Moreno D. Personnel Committee - The Personnel Committee is scheduled to meet on Thursday. May 27th. at 5:30 p.m. E. Engineering and Construction Committee - The Engineering and Construction Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday. June 2nd. at 5:30 p.m. wpdoc\gm\jcrpts93\jc05.01 End of Report - ' MEETINODATE May 12, 1993 TIME 7 :30 D.LI. DISTRIDTS 122.3.5.6.7, 11. 13 & 14 DISTRICT I JOINT BOARDS ILUU) . . . . . . . RICNARDSON .. . ✓ (GEYER) . . . . .. ... BARRERA ..... IBEYER) . . .. . . BARAMA ...... ✓ IDENESI ......... BEIr........ IREADE) . . .. . . FERRYMAN . ... IWCLANAHANI .... CATLIN ...... (FONTIOUSI . . . . SALTARELLI . .. ISCOTII . ........ COLLWS .... _ `J ISTEINERI . . . . . STANTON .. . .. J/ IDENAY) ......... COX ........ ISONEI ....... DEBAY....... OISTRICT2 (NELSON ........ OUNIAP...... IOULLMSONJ ��WEDAA . . . . . L/ (RICEI .......... iMWi....... ISCOTT) . . . . LUNS .. . Je IREADEI ......... FERRYMAN ... _ IBEYER .. . ... BARRERA ... ... JG IMAHONEY)....... BIiIN ....... ATE IDENESI ...... ........ J.10 (BROVMI.. ....... GRPFIN ...... IMaCLANAHAN) . CATLIN . .. .... . IWEDAAI ........ GULLU(SON ... IFLORAI . . .... MAHONEY . ... . . IWAM ......... HAMMOND ... IECKENRODEI . . MORENO.MARUL ICOX1 ........... HART........ _ (PARKER) . . . . . NELSON ....... IAGE1 ........... XERSY ....... IDALYI . .. . . . . RCKLEfl ....... (FORSYTHD ...... UZSLO ...... ILUTZ) ... . . .. RILIDO ....... (SILVA) .......... EBIIBIB ...... ISTEINENI ..... STANTON ..... .e IRIOIARDSONI .... LUTZ .. ...... —_ (SINGER( . . . ... ZLAKET ....... _L/ IFLOMI ......... WHONEY .... ILWNI ........... MWER . ...... _ DISTRICT J IECKENIIOOE) ..... MOIIENO."UL IMARTINEZI... . SAREN .IyL� IFULIDOI ......... MOLLENO,TED _ WELSONI .. DUNWP............ ! (PARKER) ........ NELSON ...... IMOCLANAHANI . CATLIN . ...... IOUNLAR ........ PARIO:R ...... — ISCOTT) . . ... COLLINS ...... (DALYI ..... ..... RCXLEII ..... (RICE) . . . . . . . ..BWNS........ (MCIQTI) .... PoNTOUB .... IMAHONEY) . . . .liGBS ........ ISALTARELLD .... RIGLETT ..... _ IBRO. ...... GRIFFIN ....... �� (LUTZ) ........,. MLWO .... IAOE) ICERRYLAML . . . ..... ILUTZI .......... SIW ARELLI .. IFOIISYIHEI LABZlO ....... 9_ (RONTIO 11)......... SANS NE .... IRICNARDSONI . LUTZ . . . . ..... IDEBAYI ......... SANSONE .. ILINN) . . . . . . . . MINER ........ �_ (MARTW@1....... SAREN . ... IDALYI .. . .. . . RCXIER ....... $[ g IROWAILLE) ...... SILVA . .... — IROBITAILLEI . . . SILVA .. .... allKEn ........ SINGER .... _ IZLAKETI . . SINGER ., �- (STEGER) ........ STANTON TE — ISINERI ..... STANTON ... A (STANTON) ....... (RATES) . . . .. SVLVIA ..... :MILLEN ......... SWAN ....... _ (BATES) ......... SYLVIA ...... _ DISTRICT6 IRERRY/SWEAMIU WAHNER ..... IDEBAYI .. . . . . COX IOULLMSONI .. . .. . WEDAA ...... IDEBAYI _.. .. . SAN50NE ..... (NOBITAILLEI ...... WINCHELL .... — (STANTON) . ... STEINER. ...... (SINGERI . . . . ..... ZLAKET ...... — — DISTRICT 6 STAFF OTHERS IE£RRY) . .... WANNER .... SYLVESTER . 1� WOODRUFF. BROWN.... ANWAR ... (COX( . . . . .. . . HART......... ANDERSON . DEMIR ISTANTONI . . . . STEINEq....... CLAWSON.. FLEMWG... DISTRICT 7 DAWES.... HOHENER .. (SALTARELLI) .. WAHNEf ..... OOM ZYCA . IBEYEAFERI ... G AHNEfl .... HODGES .. HUNT .. .. IBEVENI . ..... BARREN ...... HODGES ... HUNT ..... WARD)NEI .... HAMMO . . . .. .. KYLE ..... KNOPF ..., YZ WUl.JD ...... HORENO. . . LINGER .... LEE .... IPULB)OI ...... MOPENO.TEO NICHOL LWDSIROM ISTANTONI .... STEINER. . . . . . . NIWOLB ... LYNW .... OOTEN .... SHAW .... DISTRICT I SIMPSON .. WAGON . , . IROBITAILLEI ... WL.L....... STNEED ... YOUNG.A. VINUNT ISILVA) ....... WINSO . .. ISTINEfl ..... STANTON (/.E���S,Y�E/��� �✓ DISTRICT 13 I{/ / j#• /L i & IRE 1 . . .. . GULLIXBON . .. / _ ♦_ I(�(J.�Aw/P��Ow.�/i )( lfJ� ISEVENI .... PANDER . ...... l�7Qa{Ap (DUNIAR . . ... PARKER ....... IDALYI . . . . . STEI ER....... pys�'Yq- (STANTONI . . .. STEINEq....... DISTRICT 10 /y :MILLET( . . . SWAN ... TT) . .. . PoNTOUS UB .....(BEYER WARD; .. .. . . BABBEOA ...... WARD; ... HAMMOND . ISTANTONI . . .. STEINEfl....... V 4/16I93 PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY May 12 , 1993 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION FIRM Please Print Please Print S DISTRICT 2 IS ... WEOM .......SCOTn .. . —_ ISOOTR .. . COLLMB ...... _ IS ERI . . . ... B FMM...... IDENESI . . .... e... ......... _ INEDLANAHAN) . QATLM ....... (FLORA) . . . .. . MAHONEY ..... —_ IEO NRODEI .. MORENO.UAIM _ IPAF¢ RI . .. . . NELSON ....... _ _ IDAM ... . . .. PIOALER....... ILUTZI . . . . ... v,.T,. ....... ISnNERI ... . . STANTON ..... ' ISWGERI . . .... ZLAKEf ....... COUNTY SjioN DISTRIcfs OF O E CAONW, P.0.Box 8127 - Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127 REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM �../ TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES. y / DATE: S-' al93 AGENDA ITEM NO. b NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) DdM,6-Al; 6 A+ D6 69 ok HOME ADDRESS: /0c2.Fo LJ4//Ar-1'exfI 3 E 9I1r FaZ (NUMBER/STREET) �ov ✓rsiu UAGL6y (ia� 9�7�� /� (CIT ZIP CODE) TELEPHONE: 7 6///3- 00YJY REPRESENTING: ,4.2Cf'i fil (SELF OR NAME OF ORGANIZATION F28A 5/12/93 JOINT BOARD MEETING #4 - ANNUAL ELECTIONS OF DISTRICT CHAIRMAN AND CHAIRMAN PRO TEM DISTRICT 1 - Robert Richardson nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Fred Barrera nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 2 - John Collins and Henry Wedaa nominated for Chairman. Vote was polled by written ballot, following which it was announced that John Collins had been elected Chairman. Henry Wedaa nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 3 - Sal Sapien nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Burnie Dunlap nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 5 - John C. Cox, Jr. nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Phil Sansone nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 6 - James Wahner nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Evelyn Hart nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 7 - Charles Puckett nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. James Wahner nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 11 - Grace Winchell nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Victor Leipzig nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 13 - John Gullixson nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Fred Barrera nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. DISTRICT 14 - Peer Swan nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. Leslie Pontious nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and seconded that nominations be closed. -1- # 6 - PUBLIC COMMENTS Domenic A. Defeo, Jr.: I was hired in November 1992 by the Districts as a mechanic at Plant No. 1. 1 received a two month evaluation that had six line items. The first one was fair as far as my knowledge of equipment, the rest were all good. I received a four month evaluation in the middle of my third month and the top box went from fair to good; all the rest remained fair. I was terminated the same day. 1 asked for a meeting with Mr. Pigmon and Mr. Jean Taisne. The outcome was that I was terminated. I asked Mr. Gary Hasenstab to look into it and 1 never got a reply. I thought that this was my only recourse in coming here and to plead my case. I am attending Rancho Santiago College in the ------- and wastewater treatment, ---- ----- hydraulics ------ I have thirteen years in the Army Reserves and have been a professional and I think it is very unprofessional the way this matter was handled. I was hoping that this could be looked into in a professional manner. Thank you for your time. JC: Thank you, Mr. Defeo. Director M. Moreno: Can we ask questions? JC: This is an administrative matter. We can't take action but you can ask a question? Director M. Moreno: Within the system, is there a union? Is that an option that you have? Defeo: No. As a probationary employee, I was told that I couldn't ------- until my probation was over. As a District employee, I was told I had no rights. ----------- so I had no protection. Director M. Moreno: That's what I wanted to know. Thank you. JC: Is there anyone else that wishes to address the Board? Director Gullixson: In the terms of our procedure, does this type of matter necessarily come before the Executive Committee in sometimes closed session as a Personnel Committee or how do we work this? JC: Are you asking whether this has been before a Board committee? Director Gullixson: I am wondering if he has the procedure for directing his grievances to our Executive Committee or is this strictly through our Personnel Office ---- at his discretion. -2- # 6 - PUBLIC COMMENTS Domenic A. Defeo, Jr.: I was hired in November 1992 by the Districts as a `J mechanic at Plant No. 1. 1 received a two month evaluation that had six line items. The first one was fair as far as my knowledge of equipment, the rest were all good. I received a four month evaluation in the middle of my third month and the top box went from fair to good; all the rest remained fair. I was terminated the same day. 1 asked for a meeting with Mr. Pigmon and Mr. Jean Talsne. The outcome was that I was terminated. I asked Mr. Gary Hasenstab to look into it and I never got a reply. I thought that this was my only recourse in coming here and to plead my case. I am attending Rancho Santiago College in the ------- and wastewater treatment, ---- ----- hydraulics ------ I have thirteen years in the Army Reserves and have been a professional and I think it is very unprofessional the way this matter was handled. I was hoping that this could be looked into in a professional manner. Thank you for your time. JC: Thank you, Mr. Defeo. Director M. Moreno: Can we ask questions? JC: This is an administrative matter. We can't take action but you can ask a question? Director M. Moreno: Within the system, is there a union? Is that an option that you have? Defeo: No. As a probationary employee, 1 was told that I couldn't ------- until my probation was over. As a District employee, I was told I had no rights. ----------- so I had no protection. Director M. Moreno: That's what I wanted to know. Thank you. JC: Is there anyone else that wishes to address the Board? Director Gullixson: In the terms of our procedure, does this type of matter necessarily come before the Executive Committee in sometimes closed session as a Personnel Committee or how do we work this? JC: Are you asking whether this has been before a Board committee? Director Gullixson: I am wondering if he has the procedure for directing his grievances to our Executive Committee or is this strictly through our Personnel Office ---- at his discretion. -2- TLW: Mr. Defeo is a probationary employee as is true in most all public agencies. Where he says he has no rights that sounds harsh but that is not totally accurate but substantially accurate. Probationary employees essentially serve --- and the agency as the employer need not give cause, need not give it with particular `.. reasons or whatever. The termination procedure is such then that while it is in review, the alternate decision rests with the General Manager. Director ?: How long is the probationary period? TLW: Six months, there is provision for extension but it is essentially six months. #7a - JOINT CHAIRMAN REPORT JC: Any further questions? Then we will move on the reports. This evening it is my pleasure to be able to make a PRIDE presentation. As you know I always like to have those employees who have submitted suggestions to the District to save a substantial sum of money to the Districts and are thereby rewarded. The maximum amount come before the Boards and receive their compensation and recognition. At the last Fiscal Policy Committee there were ten PRIDE cost savings or safety awards by our employees totaling $4,856.00 that we paid in PRIDE awards. The ten PRIDE proposals are estimated to save approximately $62,035 annually. Tonight we will recognize an employee that received the maximum $1,500 for his suggestion. At this time I would like to ask Bob Ooten to come forward to introduce our PRIDE employee. .... B0: Thank you, Mr. Chairman and the Boards of Directors. I would like to introduce to you Dale Sparks, one of our senior operations staff. Dale came up with an automated means of doing something that we do manually. Cost of about $5.00 a day. By applying this automated means at the plant, we expect to save $1,300.00 a year and about $30,000 in staff ------- For that I recommend that Dale receive the maximum PRIDE award of $1,500.00 and a certificate of ------. JC: Dale, we appreciate your contribution to the Districts. We want you to know that it certainly is appreciated and hopefully you will have some more of those for us. Thank you. The Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 19th, at 5:30 p.m. The Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Ocean Monitoring is to meet on Wednesday, May 26th, at 4:30 p.m. (immediately preceding the Executive/Fiscal Policy Committee's meeting). The Executive and Fiscal Policy Committees will be meeting on Wednesday, May 26th at 5:30 p.m. I would like to Invite Eva Miner and Maria Moreno. -3- Personnel Committee is scheduled to meet on Thursday, May 27th, at 5:30 p.m. The newly-formed Engineering and Construction Committee will meet on Wednesday, June 2nd, at 5:30 p.m. #7b - GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT JWS: Just two brief items. In 1981 the Sanitation Districts were one of the founding members of the Southern California Energy Coalition which is a consortium of both private and public organizations actually started in Orange County that are high energy users. The users under this consortium agreed to shave energy demands during peak periods and in turn Edison pays us a standby amount so that if they have to call upon us, we can shed load for them so their system doesn't go down or they go Into rolling brown-outs. Over the 11 or 12 years that we have been in that program we have received $1.2 million and never had to shed except during practice runs. I am pleased to inform you that for 1992 we just received a check last month for $185,000. We have struck out in trying to schedule a second new Directors' Orientation and Treatment Plant Tour. I would like to suggest to those of you that would like a briefing and a plant tour, if you would give me a call we will arrange to do that at a convenient time for you. #12b1 - ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION 1993 SERIES 1. AND THE FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST SWAP (1993 SWAP) JC: I would like to point out that there are some action things that we want to approve but there has been a request that the wording in 12(b)(1)(0 in the second line thereof should say "and General Counsel recommend" and to delete request. Director Swan- ----------------- JC: After the word White we would insert "or other acceptable counsel" to clear that up. Director Stanton: He ask that the record show that he abstains on all of Item #12. #12b2 - OWNER-CONTROLLED WRAP-UP INSURANCE PROGRAM Director Parker: Is the wrap-up program self-insured or a conventional? JWS: It would be conventional insurance. -4- #14 - CLOSED SESSION TLW: We will be going into closed session tonight to again review the status of the District's position relative to the construction contract and the engine generator purchase contracts respectively, with Brinderson Corporation (J-19-2) and Cooper (J-19A). The discussion will point to the preparation for the pending arbitration for resolution of the disagreements. #26 - REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, BETWEEN THE ARCHES (NEWPORT BOULEVARD) AND DOVER DRIVE, CONTRACT NO. 5-37-4 TMD: Mr. Chairman, this issue is a joint District 5 and 6 issue. It is a rehabilitation of a sewer in Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) that was built in 1936. We are ---- with this in a rather fast pace because we are trying to get all this work done before Caltrans rebuilds PCH behind The Arches and Dover Drive within Newport Beach. We have had alot of work in getting this project ready. We did studies on this sewer and we are now going to show you what we found to see the inside of this sewer. This is electronically-controlled. (Gave a visual presentation) That is a separation in joints that you are seeing there. We are going with the flow. We have it blocked; this is about 3:00 in the morning at low flow. That spray you see is the cleaning equipment in front of it. Now you will see the cracks in the sewer. The sewer is ready to fail here. I have about six hours of tape to show you but this sewer is in very bad shape. This project will do a couple of things. We've had an awful lot of meetings down there with the business community. They are very worried in these hard economic times about the impact this will have on them. The people that live adjacent to the business community especially on the hills are concerned. They are concerned about noise. The reason that I mention that is there is alot of thought of whether we should work days or work nights. Working nights has less impact on the business and traffic but people can't sleep. We have had alot of meetings with the Mariners Mile Association and at the City Hall where we had public meetings to build consensus and we've done that. We have a general sign-off from the people that are the most concerned. About half the project we're going to work around the clock on it to get it done beginning September 13, the first Monday after school starts. We are going to insert a liner in this pipe and we will use the old pipe as a carrier but it will be a structural liner on the inside. -5- The other half of the project has to be a bigger pipe so we can't do that. We will do that only in the daytime. That happens to be between the Pelican Wall and Dover Drive. We are guaranteeing that we will keep access open to each business at all times and we have come up with the plan that we can do the work so that we won't close down any business. We are asking that you approve these plans and specifications with bonus and penalty clauses to ensure that our contractor will meet the deadlines and the schedules that we have told the people down there we will meet. All the work will be done by Christmas but it does provide that if it is not, the contractor has to stop during the Christmas season and not interrupt the business community during that season and come back after January. Caltrans is going to begin their work during February so we will be done by February 1st with all this work. If you approve the specifications now we will advertise this project and bring it back for award at the July Board. This will allow for the successful contractor to order the necessary pipe so that the actual construction can begin September 13. It is a very detailed schedule of work. The estimated cost for the whole project is $1.8 million. Director Debay: Were you able to get rid of the backup bells on the trucks at night? TMD: We could not so what we have put in the specifications is that in the area that we are going to rehab all the kits, and the excavations will be done daylight only and rehab will be done at night when we have an advantage of lower flows. We have to do the rehab in a live sewer so there won't be alot of noisy equipment at night. Director Sansone: I move the actions with the changes that Tom and I discussed earlier on laterals. Director ?: One question on the liners. What is the life expectancy of that? TMD: We would expect that liner to have a 40 or 50 years life expectancy. #31 - CRYSTAL COVE PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO. 5-36 TMD: This project is the construction of a new pump station to serve the Newport Beach down coast, an area just south the city. The pump station will be built adjacent to and across the highway from Crystal Cove. We've received bids from this project a couple of weeks ago and we had bids that ranged from just under $1.0 million to approximately $1.3 million. The low bid and the second low bid were separated by less than $4,000 on a $1.0 million estimate. Our original estimate was $1.4 million but we've been receiving very low bids so we lowered the engineers estimate prior to bidding to $1.0 million so we were L� within $7,000 of the bid. -6- The other half of the project has to be a bigger pipe so we can't do that. We will do that only in the daytime. That happens to be between the Pelican Wall and Dover Drive. We are guaranteeing that we will keep access open to each business y at all times and we have come up with the plan that we can do the work so that we won't close down any business. We are asking that you approve these plans and specifications with bonus and penalty clauses to ensure that our contractor will meet the deadlines and the schedules that we have told the people down there we will meet. All the work will be done by Christmas but it does provide that if it is not, the contractor has to stop during the Christmas season and not interrupt the business community during that season and come back after January. Caltrans is going to begin their work during February so we will be done by February 1 at with all this work. If you approve the specifications now we will advertise this project and bring it back for award at the July Board. This will allow for the successful contractor to order the necessary pipe so that the actual construction can begin September 13. It is a very detailed schedule of work. The estimated cost for the whole project is $1.8 million. Director Debay: Were you able to get rid of the backup bells on the trucks at night? TMD: We could not so what we have put in the specifications is that in the area that we are going to rehab all the kits, and the excavations will be done daylight ``..� only and rehab will be done at night when we have an advantage of lower flows. We have to do the rehab in a live sewer so there won't be alot of noisy equipment at night. Director Sansone: I move the actions with the changes that Tom and I discussed earlier on laterals. Director ?: One question on the liners. What is the life expectancy of that? TMD: We would expect that liner to have a 40 or 50 years life expectancy. #31 - CRYSTAL COVE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-36 TMD: This project is the construction of a new pump station to serve the Newport Beach down coast, an area just south the city. The pump station will be built adjacent to and across the highway from Crystal Cove. We've received bids from this project a couple of weeks ago and we had bids that ranged from just under $1 .0 million to approximately $1.3 million. The low bid and the second low bid were separated by less than $4,000 on a $1 .0 million estimate. Our original estimate was $1.4 million but we've been receiving very low bids so we lowered the engineers estimate prior to bidding to $1 .0 million so we were y within $7,000 of the bid. -6- We are pleased with these results. It is a very good bidding result and we recommend tonight that you approve two addendums that we issued that clarify the project, make minor technical changes and award the bid to the low bidder, Schuler Engineering Corporation. #34 - SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES FOR PARK STANTON PLACE SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENTS IN THE CITY OF STANTON JC: I will entertain discussion. Director Sapien: I submitted this request ---------- and City of Stanton's general plan. There was considerable discussion at the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committee and decided not to pursue ------ --------------- with the senior citizen population growing and for affordable housing. Director Dunlap: The problem I have with this proposal is that it changes the fee schedule that has been developed. If it is fair in every case is not the issue here. My concern is taking it out of context. What it does is basically disrupts the entire equity position of our fee schedule. -------- each of our cities have an obligation for housing whether it be for seniors or another part of our population. We are moving as aggressively as we can and trying to solve without taking one piece of a total fee structure, disturbing the equity position of all the other players. I just oppose to support this from being out of context. We would have to ----- the entire fee schedule for every District, for every single hookup. I don't think it is the right ----- Director Catlin: I would have to echo Director Dunlap. I have some concern on �./ this because we are all in the redevelopment. I would have to agree with the staff's position on our ----- It would be inequitable in doing this. It would disrupt our financing -------- I just don't think we should open this up. Director Kerry: I don't know exactly what the situation is ------- set aside that they are suppose to be using to help our low cost ------- There may be some way of going through them. There may be another total approach to get that funding. This is an appropriate fee; it's just a question as to who pays now. Director Collins: I think we are all sensitive especially since it's a political force. We are very sensitive to senior housing and affordable housing. We all have mandates that we have to live by. I am really concerned with messing with a fee structure that makes decisions on the fly. Tape ended. -7- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 61 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON MAY 129 1993 PN{TATfoN . 9 `oyolilan o GIs J2 o uoo• T�, s:- S/oc. 19Se AgNCH COON' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Noe. 1, 2,3, 5, B, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on May 12, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2,3. 5,5, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: - ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS \..Iy DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Robert Richardson, Chairman Thomas E. Lutz Fred Barrere,Chairman pro tom Gem Beyer James M.Ferryman Nate Reade • Thomas R. Safeties Leslie Pomious • Roger Stanton Wiliam G. Steiner v DISTRICT NO.2: _>L Jahn Collins, Chairman George Scott Henry W. Wedaa, Chairmen pro tem John M.Gullixsan Fred Batters Gen Bayer _ Bob Ben _� Berry Dena Buck Catlin MWIy McCbnhan Wiliam D. Mahoney James H.Flora Maria Moreno Norman Z.Eckermde 3_ Carrey J.Nelsen Glen Parker * Iry Pickier Tom Daly * Miguel Pu ido Thomas E.LuT, 1_ Roger Stanton William G. Steiner George L.Zlaket Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO.3: Sol A. Sorption, Chairman Don Martin: Burnie Dunlop. Chairmen pro tam Carrey J. Nelson Bock Catlin Molry Mcclanhen Jahn Collin George Scott _ James V.Evans Margie L. Rice James H.Flora William D. Mahone a_ Don R.Griffin Arthur Brown Gail Kerry Cecilia L.Age x Frank Laszlo Gwen A.Forsythe Thomas E. LWz Roben Richardson Eva G.Miner Wally Linn In,Pickier _ Tom Daly x Jim Silva Earle Robitaille _L Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket .E— Raper Stanton William G. Stain, _1L Charles Sylvia Ronald Bates DISTRICT NO.5: Z John C.Cox, Jr., Chairman Jan Debay Phil Someone, Chairman pro ter Jan Debay William G.Steiner Roger Stamen DISTRICT NO. 6: _E_ James A.Warner, Chairman Anhur Perry . Evelyn Han.Chairman We tem John C. Cox. Jr. Wiliam G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: _� Charles E. Puckett.Chairman Thomas R.SaltarelF y_ James A.Warner, Chairman pro lem Mika Schaefer Fred Barrere Gene Beyer Jan Debay Phil Sansone Barry Hammond Mike Ward • Ted Moreno Miguel Pulido • Wiliam G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: Grace Winchell, Chairman Eerie Robitaille _ Victor Leipzig, Chairman pro tern x Jim Silva Roger Stanton Wlliem G.Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M.Gullixson, Chairman Henry W.Wades Fred Barrere, Chairman pro tam Gen Beyer x Glenn Parker Burnie Dunlap c g_ Iry Pickle, Tom Daly x William G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Fear A. Swan,Chairman Darryl Miller "J x _ Leslie Pontious, Chairman pro ter Charles E. Puckett 3_ Fred Barrere Gene Beyer Barry Hammond Mike Ward is William G. Stainr Roger Stanton —2— 05/12/93 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Corinne Clawson, Patti Gorczyca, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, Kim Patton, Mary Simpson, Dale Sparks, Chuck Winsor, '. Ray Young, Paula Zellor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Carolyn Bruskin, Jamil Demir, Domenic A. Defeo, Jr., Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Phil Stone DISTRICT 1 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tern of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1. It was then moved: That Director Robert Richardson be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Richardson as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Fred Barrera be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was �..✓ polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Barrera as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 2 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman oro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2. It was then moved: That Directors Henry W. Wedaa and John Collins be nominated as candidates for the office of Chairman. The vote was then polled by written ballot, following which the Assistant Secretary announced that Director Collins had been elected Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Henry W. Wedaa be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Barrera as Chairman pro tem. -3- 05/12/93 DISTRICT 3 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared `.� nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3. 1 It was then moved: That Director Sal Sapien be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sapien as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Burnie Dunlap be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Dunlap as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 5 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5. It was then moved: That Director John C. Cox, Jr. be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Cox as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Phil Sansone be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sansone as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 6 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman Pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6. It was then moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Cox as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Evelyn Hart be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hart as `.� Chairman pro tem. -4- 05/12/93 DISTRICT 7 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman Pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared J nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7. It was then moved: That Director Charles E. Puckett be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled , and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Puckett as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Wahner as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 11 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 . It was then moved: That Director Grace H. Winchell be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Winchell as �..✓ Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Victor Leipzig be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Leipzig as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 13 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman Pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13. It was then moved: That Director John Gullixson be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Gullixson as Chairman. -5- 05/12/93 It was further moved: That Director Fred Barrera be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Barrera as Chairman pro tem. DISTRICT 14 This being the annual meeting at which Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14. It was then moved: That Director Peer A. Swan be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Swan as Chairman. It was further moved: That Director Leslie A. Pontious be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Pontious as Chairman pro tem. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized Domenic A. Recognition of persons who wish to Defeo, Jr., a former employee of the be heard on matters of general Districts, who addressed the Boards interest regarding his recent termination from employment with the Districts during his probationary period and requested a review. In response to Directors' questions regarding the policies and procedures for grievances for terminated probationary employees, the Joint Chairman and General Counsel explained that this was an administrative matter handled through the Personnel Office and no action could be taken at this time. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman briefly reviewed the Presentation of PRIDE Awards to Districts' PRIDE program which rewards employees employees for creative suggestions with an economic or safety benefit to the Districts. He reported that at its last meeting, the Fiscal Policy Committee approved ten PRIDE cost-saving or safety suggestion awards to employees totaling $4,856.00. Chairman Mahoney then asked Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations, to come forward and assist in the presentation of the maximum award amount of $1.500.00 to employee Dale Sparks. Mr. Ooten reported that Dale Sparks' suggestion, resulting in automation of a task that was previously done manually, is estimated to save the Districts approximately $30,000.00. The Joint Chairman commended the employee for his PRIDE suggestion and presented Mr. Sparks with his $1,500.00 cash award and certificate of u appreciation. -6- 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the Report of the Joint Chairman tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, May 19th, at 5:30 p.m. Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Ocean Monitoring - Wednesday, May 26th, at 4:30 p.m., immediately preceeding the Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees' meeting Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees - Wednesday, May 26th, at 5:30 p.m. (Directors Eva Miner and Maria Moreno were also invited to attend.) Personnel Committee - Thursday, May 27th, at 5:30 p.m. Engineering and Construction Committee - Wednesday, June 2nd at 5:30 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that in 1981 Report of the General Manager the Districts were one of the founding members of the Southern California Energy Coalition, which is a consortium of both private and public organizations, started in Orange County, that are high-energy users. The users in this consortium agreed with the Southern California Edison (SCE) to reduce energy demands during peak periods. SCE then pays the members a standby amount so that if they have to call upon them they can shed energy load so Edison's system doesn't go down or into rolling brown-outs. Since this program has been implemented the Districts have `..✓ received $1.2 million and never had to shed except during practice runs. Mr. Sylvester then reported that for 1992 the Districts received a check for $185,000.00. The General Manager then stated that staff had been unsuccessful trying to schedule a second new Directors' Orientation and Treatment Plant tour. He suggested that those Directors that would like a briefing and plant tour contact him and arrangements would be made on an individual basis. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -7- 05/12/93 \� DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -8- 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and �..� are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 04/07/93 04/21/93 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 956,513.63 $630,705.82 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,087,962.84 529,701 .49 Joint Working Capital Fund - 131 ,944.79 123,995.89 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 8,033.69 30,169.91 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 427.97 52.51 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 26,457.32 79,681 .69 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 18,672.11 22,146.81 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 256,915.82 20,767.24 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 292.61 48.49 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 41,914.99 20,910.08 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 461 .19 924.10 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 95.61 .00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 39,938.96 333.83 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 28,365.75 53.64 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,285.88 .00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 9,650.54 302.61 53.609.933.70 $1.459,794.11 �✓ ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Five Flatbed Trucks. Specification No. A-168. to That the bid tabulation and recommendation Los Angeles Freightliner/GMC re award of Purchase of Five Flatbed Trucks, Specification No. A-168, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Los Angeles Freightliner/GMC for a total amount not to exceed $115,530.80 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Microcomputer Hardware. Software and Associated Peripherals, That the bid tabulation and recommendation Specification No. E-229. to GST. Inc. re award of purchase order contract for Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, Specification No. E-229, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to GST, Inc. for nine systems, for a total amount not to exceed $31,557.25 plus sales tax. -9- 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizina staff to issue a Purchase order to bioMerieux Vitek. Inc. for That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to Purchase of bioMerieux Vitek Jr. issue a purchase order to bioMerieux Vitek, Bacteria Identification System Inc. in the amount of $37,130.00, plus (Specification No. E-230) sales tax and freight, for Purchase of bioMerieux Vitek Jr. Bacteria Identification System, (Specification No. E-230). Approving Change Order No. 21 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the plans and specifications for Job No. J-19-1 That Change Order No. 21 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1 , Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $192,366.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for three items of additional work or other contract adjustments, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Job No. P1-38-2 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-45, approving plans and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish May 18, 1993 as the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. �..' ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee certification John Carollo Engineers for design, of the final negotiated fee relative to construction support services and Addendum No. 3 to the Professional preparation of operation and Services Agreement with John Carollo maintenance manuals for Job Engineers for design, construction support Nos. P7-38 and P2-43 services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional engineering services for seismic work as provided in the agreement and to incorporate additional changes in the scope of work, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-46, approving Addendum No. 3 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $527,600.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount not to exceed $1,991,565.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,519,165.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a �..' part of these minutes. -10- 05/12193 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approvina Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Dames & Moore. Inc.. a Delaware Resolution No. 93-47, approving Addendum Corporation for Job Nos. P1-38-3 and No. 3 to the Professional Services P2-43-2 Agreement with Dames & Moore, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, to conduct Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, providing for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said agreement with no change in the maximum authorized compensation of $840,620.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting That the Selection Committee certification Engineers for Job Nos. P1-40-2 and of the final negotiated fee relative to the P2-47-2 Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-48, approving said agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for said services, on an hourly-basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $549,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is Professional Services Agreement hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum with Brown and Caldwell Consulting_ No. 2 to the Professional Services Engineers for planning. design and Agreement with Brown and Caldwell construction services for Job Consulting Engineers for planning, design Nos. J-11-1. J-26. J-27. P2-23-5-1. and construction services in connection with P2-35-2. P2-35-3. P2-35-4 and master-planned support facilities at Plants 1 P2-35-5 and 2 (includes Job Nos. J-11-1, J-26, J-27, P2-23-5-1, P2-35-2, P2-35-3, P2-35-4 and P2-35-5) providing for changes to the original scope of work. _11_ 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate an That the Selection Committee be, and is `r..� agreement for Environmental and hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and Geotechnical Services. Specification negotiate an agreement for Environmental No. 5-070 and Geotechnical Services, Specification No. 5-070, for various collection system and treatment plant projects to be constructed over the next three years. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive. file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committee Committee's meeting and Executive Policy Committee's meeting held on April 21, 1993 and April 28, 1993, respectively, be and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP) Approving Orrick. Herrington and Sutcliffe to serve as special bond counsel Moved, seconded and duly carried: That selection of Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe to serve as special bond counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP, (1993 SWAP), be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby request a fee proposal for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -12- 05/12/93 Aporovina Rourke. Woodruff & Spradlin to serve as co-counsel Moved, seconded and duly carried: _ That selection of Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin to serve as co-counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP, (1993 SWAP), be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby request a fee proposal for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Directina staff and General Counsel to recommend that - Merrill Lynch utilize Brown and Wood or Jones. Hall. Hill or other acceptable counsel to serve as underwriter's counsel Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized and directed to recommend that Merrill Lynch, Districts' underwriter, utilize either the firm of Brown and Wood or the firm of Jones, Hall, Hill and White, or other acceptable counsel, to serve as underwriter's counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -13- 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program �./ Authorizina staff and General Counsel to take steps necessary to seek approval by the State Legislature of an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized to take steps necessary to seek approval by the State Legislature of an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program for Districts' construction projects. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizing staff and Robert F. Driver Associates. Districts' insurance consultant/broker. to report back with further information on an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up �..J Insurance Program Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and Robert F. Driver Associates, Districts' insurance consultant/broker, be, and are hereby, authorized and directed to report back with further information on an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program for Districts' construction projects, a draft of such a plan and an implementation schedule. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Declaring the 1993-94 Sewer Use Fees and Connection Fees will not That the Boards of Directors do hereby increase from rates established for declare that the 1993-94 Sewer Use Fees the 1992-93 fiscal year and Connection Fees will not increase from rates established for the 1992-93 fiscal year and will continue to be in effect for 1993-94, provided the Governor and State Legislature do not confiscate Districts' property taxes, as follows: -14- 05/12/93 ANNUAL SEWER USE FEES - 1993-94 District Single-Family Multi-Family Non-Residential No. Residential Residential Properties 1 S 83.24 $49.94/Unit $59.52/1,000 SF 2 71 .52 42.91/Unit 51 .14/1,000 SF 3 73.89 44.33/Unit 52.83/1,000 SF 5 96.75 58.05/Unit 69.18/1,000 SF 6 76.47 45.88/Unit 54.68/1,000 SF 7 50.09 30.05/Unit 35.81/1,000 SF 11 60.00 36.00/Unit 42.90/1,000 SF 13 100.00 60.00/Unit 71,50/1,000 SF 14 NONE - District No. 14 is fully funded by IRWD CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION FEES - 1993-94 DISTRICTS NO. 1. 2. 3. 5. 6, 7. 11 & 13 RESIDENTIAL $2,350/DWELLING UNIT �,.✓ NON-RESIDENTIAL $470/1,000 SQUARE FEET, $2,350 MINIMUM DISTRICT NO. 14 NONE - District No. 14 if fully funded by IRWD Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff and General Counsel to draft an amendment to the That staff and General Counsel be, and are Districts' Ordinance Establishing hereby, authorized and directed to draft an Source Control Fees. Administrative amendment to the Districts' Ordinance Fees. Non-Comoliance Sampling Fees Establishing Source Control Fees, and Miscellaneous Charges Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges for introduction and first reading at the regular June meeting of the Boards of Directors, to adjust or establish said fees in the amounts determined necessary to recover the Districts' costs. -15- 05/12/93 Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICTS 1 .2.5.6.7.11 .13&14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Directing that no further study be given re modifying sewer connection That the Boards of Directors do hereby fees direct that no further study be given to the issue of modifying sewer connection fees and that no change be made to the existing policy that does not allow fee adjustments. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Amending Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20. That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt as amended establishing a 1993 Resolution No. 93-49, amending Summer Work Program Classification and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a 1993 Summer Work Program for painting, grounds maintenance and pump station maintenance work. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Urging Equitable Allocation of Property Taxes and State Support of That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt School Funding in California Resolution No. 93-50, Urging Equitable Allocation of Property Taxes and State Support of School Funding in California before consideration of further Property Tax Shifts. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -16- 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Districts' Two-Way Radio System/County-Wide 800 MHz Radio System Authorizing staff to continue to monitor the orogress and development of the proposed new County-Wide 800 MHz Radio System Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to continue to monitor the progress and development of the proposed new County-Wide 800 MHz Radio System and, upon receipt of additional information, assess the advisability of the Districts' participation in the system and report back to the Boards; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff in the interim continue to maintain the Districts' existing 453 MHz Two-Way Radio system in a state of readiness and repair to meet the Districts' day-to-day and emergency radio communications needs. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Motorola Communications and Electronics. Inc. for Purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment (Specification No. E-227) Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. in the amount of $38,383.00 plus sales tax, for Purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment (Specification No. E-227). Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -17- 05/12/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve the written report of the Conservation. Recycle That the written report of the Conservation, 4� and Reuse Committee Recycle and Reuse Committee's meeting held on April 27, 1993, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors of General Counsel's Comments Prior to the need for a closed session as authorized Closed Session by Government Code Section 54956.9 to review: 1) Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to the co-generation internal combustion engines. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at 8:07 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:28 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. DISTRICTS 1 & 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and No. 2-30 specifications for Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30, authorizing a net addition of $78,273.22 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company for five items of additional or modified work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993. _7 g_ 05/12/93 DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving an exchange of ownership Agreement with the City of Placentia That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-51-2, approving an `..� exchange of ownership Agreement between the City of Placentia and County Sanitation District No. 2, providing for transfer of ownership of the Palm Avenue Purchase to the City of Placentia. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. - DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993. DISTRICT 7 Actions relative to Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station. Phase 1. Contract No. 7-14-1-1 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-14-1-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: �✓ That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1, granting a time extension of 33 calendar days to the contract with Silveri & LeBouef for completion of said work due to inclement weather, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Contract No. 7-14-1-1 as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-55-7, accepting Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1 as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -19- 05/12/93 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Grant of Easement to Crow Winthrop Development for 10' That the Board of Directors hereby adopts right-of-way re Contract No. 7-11-2 Resolution No. 93-56-7, approving and authorizing execution of Grant of Easement to Crow Winthrop Development for 10' right-of-way required to install a new sewer line over the northeasterly corner of District's Michelson Pump Station site, Contract No. 7-11-2 in exchange for a Quitclaim of abandoned sewer line in a 10' easement located on said site from Crow Winthrop Development. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file Summons and Complaint for Order Relieving That the Summons and Complaint for Order Petitioner from provisions of Relieving Petitioner from provisions of Government Code, Section 945.4. Government Code, Section 945.4, Loyd T. Loyd T. Nitzen II vs. Orange County Nitzen, II vs. Orange County Sanitation Sanitation District, Case No. 708855 District, Case No. 708855, relative to an application for leave to file late claim that was denied by the District in connection with a vehicle accident in the vicinity where routine sewer maintenance was being performed in the City of Tustin by District's crews, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby, authorized to appear and defend the interests of the District. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Amendment No. 1 to Lease Agreement with General Telephone That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Company re Slater Avenue Pump Resolution No. 93-57-11, approving Station Amendment No. 1 to Lease Agreement with General Telephone Company re Slater Avenue Pump Station, authorizing an extension of lease agreement for an additional three years at the current rate of $1 ,900.00 per year. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993. -20- 05/12/93 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Accepting Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3. Contract That the Board of Directors hereby adopts No. 5-$4-3. as complete Resolution No. 93-53-5, accepting Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICTS 5 & 6 Actions re Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer. between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive. Contract No, 5-37-4 Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that the 1989 Master Plan had found that the existing sewer in Pacific Coast Highway was hydraulically inadequate to meet long-term flow projections. The sewer, built in 1936, is also failing and its replacement and/or rehabilitation for structural reasons is more urgent now than for future hydraulic needs. CALTRANS is planning to reconstruct and resurface Coast Highway between Newport Boulevard and Dover Drive in Newport Beach between February and June 1994. Therefore, this project has been accelerated in order to be completed prior to the start of the CALTRANS work. The Director of Engineering then narrated a brief video depicting the inside of the failing sewer. Mr. Dawes stated that plans and specifications are now complete for this project, the reach between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive. The CALTRANS work is being coordinated with the Districts' project, the needs of the adjacent business and residential communities, and with the needs identified by the City of Newport Beach. The sewer line _ work between Newport Boulevard and Dover Drive is scheduled to begin - construction in September 1993 with completion by January 1994. -21- 05/12/93 He further stated that there have been several public meetings between the Districts' engineering staff and the Mariners' Mile Business Association, as well as the adjacent business and residential communities. As a result, a portion of the sewer replacement will include rehabilitation by either the y insituform method or by insertion of a high density polyethylene pipe into the existing pipe (approximately 3,200 feet of 24-inch pipe) to minimize construction impacts on the community. Mr. Dawes explained alternatives considered and several of the measures being taken to mitigate impacts on the business and residential communities. The balance of the project will involve replacement of approximately 3,100 feet of 30-inch pipe and reconstruction of all manholes. Mr. Dawes also stated that as part of Contract No. 5-37-4, the Districts will identify utilities that will have a critical bearing on the selected alignment for future Contract No. 5-37-3, between the Arches and Bitter Point Pump Station, tentatively scheduled for fall 1994. The specifications provide for a bonus of $500 per day for early job completion plus a $1,000 per day bonus for early completion of the rehabilitation work. Late completion will result in identical liquidated damage assessments. The engineer's estimate for this project is $1 .8 million. He then reported that westerly of the Arches, Pacific Coast Highway has already been reconstructed by CALTRANS. Alignment studies are still being conducted by the Districts' consultant to determine the optimal alignment for this reach to minimize disruptions to a newly reconstructed Pacific Coast Highway. This reach will involve full replacement with larger carrier pipes to `./ meet future hydraulic capacity requirements. The design of this reach will be completed by year-end with construction starting after Contract No. 5-37-4 is completed. Approving plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-37-4 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-52, approving plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:35 p.m., May 12, 1993. -22- 05/12/93 DISTRICT 5 Actions re Crystal Cove Pump Station. �..✓ Contract No, 5-36 Verbal staff Report The Director of Engineering reported that in March, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-36, the new Crystal Cove Pump Station, which will serve the down coast developing areas adjacent to Crystal Cove. This pump station is an essential element within the new South Coast Trunk Sewer System, Phase 2, which was recently awarded to Mike Prlich & Sons under Contract No. 5-35-2. The Crystal Cove Pump Station will receive flow from the upstream gravity sewer system and discharge flow into the new double-barrel force main system being built under Contract No. 5-35-2. Mr. Dawes stated that on April 13, 1993, 13 bids were received for this project. The bids ranged from a high of $1,331,633.00 to a low of $993,442.00, submitted by Schuler Engineering Corporation and recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-36 �.✓ Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, making miscellaneous modifications and clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-36 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, making miscellaneous modifications and clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. -23- 05/12/93 Awarding Contract No. 5-36 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-54-5, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, to Schuler Engineering Corporation, in the total amount of $993,442.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:38 p.m., May 12, 1993. DISTRICT 3 At the April 14th meeting, District 3 Consideration of request to reduce Directors received a request to reduce sewer sewer connection charges for Park connection fees from Jan Development Co., Stanton Place Senior Citizen and Chairman Sal Sapien, Stanton City Apartments in the City of Stanton Councilman, for the Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton. After considerable discussion, because sewer connection fees are administered in accordance with a uniform policy adopted by all Districts and any modifications could have Districts'-wide implications, the matter was referred to the Fiscal Policy Committee. The Joint Chairman recognized District 3 Chairman Sapien who stated that he had submitted this request that is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Stanton. He noted that the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee reviewed the issue at length and have recommended that no further study be given to the issue of modifying sewer connection fees and that no change be made to the existing policy that does not allow for any fee adjustments. The other Districts concurred in that recommendation earlier on the agenda. He also noted that he believed support for this type of project is important with a growing senior citizen population and limited availability of affordable housing. Chairman Sapien had requested that the matter be placed on the May 12, 1993 agenda for separate consideration by District No. 3 Directors. He also directed staff and the General Counsel to draft an ordinance for introduction in the event the Directors give favorable consideration to the request. -24- 05/12/93 The Board then entered into a discussion of the issue during which several Directors spoke in support and in opposition to granting a reduction in fees for the project. At issue was the equitability of adjusting fees for one segment of the community and its impact on others in the overall fee structure, and on the relevant programs of both the Districts and the cities as well, notwithstanding the worthiness of the project. It was also pointed out that any such adjustment could also impact the other Sanitation Districts and that if it were to be considered, it should be in the context of providing an overall evaluation of the entire fee _ structure. Although support for projects of this type was expressed, it was the consensus that reduction of the sewer connection charge was inappropriate at this time. It was then moved and seconded that no action be taken on the request for a reduction of the District 3 sewer connection charges for the Park Stanton Place project. Following a roll call vote the Assistant Secretary reported that the motion had passed by virtue of 10 Directors voting in favor, and 5 Directors against. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried that the matter of reviewing the Districts' fee structure be referred to the Joint Boards for consideration. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:02 p.m., May 12, 1993. AW,V1 la Assistant Se tar f the Boards of Directors of County Sanitati Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -25- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/93 PAGE 1 R EP DRY NUMBER AP43 CLUNTY SAUIIATION OISTRIGTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/07/93 POSTING DATE 04/97/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIP710N _ . 128921 AG TECH CUMPANY 169.328.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.30-9-91 128928 AGA CORPORATION $1.074.90 DRUGS 128929 AM BEST COMPANY $90.00 BOORS 120930 A T L T $3,631.66 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SBRVICBS 128931 AMERICAN TELEPHONE i TELEORAFH $1,214.71 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 128932 A T L T $185.17 LONG DISTANCE TELBPHONS SERVICES 128933 ACLU-LABS RESEARCH INC $50.60 LAS SERVICES 128934 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP 43V.398.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES. M.O.11-I8-92. 128935 AIR ACCESSORIES CO f55.96 FILTER 120936 AIM COLD SUPPLY INC $160.86 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS - 128937 AIR PRODUCTS L CHEMICAL . IN $603.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES-_ 128938 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT f27.19 ASPHALT - _ - - - 128939 AMEN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLB $452.40 PUBLICATION 12094C AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTN -. . . ._. 6436.71, LAB SUPPLIES_. 128942 AMICON. INC f$97.86 LAB SUPPLIES 120943 ANAHEIM INC 643.00 LAB SUPPLIES 128944 ANANEIX SEWER CONSTRUCTION .. _ _ A23 r643.00. BANBR REPAIR 0I8T Sib 128919 ANDa UC0 3615.T1 --� �� LAB SUPPLIES--- -- �---- -- _ - � �--- -- - -� fTi CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT X 12894E BLAME P SI CONTROL 230.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT = 12894E ANTHONY FESI CONTROL _ .. $472.96 .. . ......_._.. _ .__._ ._.. .__. 128948 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $364.70 NOTICES i AS 12894E APPLIED BI03TST EMS INC i364.T0 LAB SUPPLIERS 128950 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING i2.$85.31 __ _ PAYROLL 88RVIC88 ____ 128951 BFI PORTABLE SERVICES 393.64 PORTABLE REMOVAL - - - n /28951 BkK LANDFILL i3.393.64 RSSIDUAL$BATTERIES REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91 1--� 128952 BATTERY SPECIALTIES .. _ 4526.5L. BATTERIES 128953 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC $4.339.83 - LAD SUPPLISB-' 128954 ROBERT bEIN WILLIAM FROST •2.442.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-33 128955 BELL SECURITY _. _...9915.00_._. __. TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES 128956 GT BILLARD INC f616.97 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 128957 SIOMENIEUV VITEK INC $40.629.16 LAB EQUIPMENT 126958 010 TECH NET. INC _ -_iR7.51_ SERVICE AGREEMENT 128959 bON-A-RUES $305.81 .. TRUCE-PARTS 12096C BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $49,101.18 SNGINIRRING BERVICSS 7-7-1 128961 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC .. _ _ __5418.20_ .. ELECTRIC PARTS 128962 BROWN A CALDVELL CONSULTING $2.336.43 _-ENGINEERING-BERVICBS7 PI-=37-__. 128963 BUDGET JANITORIAL $1,650.00 JANITORIAL BUPPLI68 12P964 BUREAU OP BUSINESS PRACTICE _..._ 155.92. _ ,._. TRAINING VIDEO 1296 BURME EN 6INEERING CO . . W1GVE8" 129966 CANT G STR EEC i2r 904 904.8383 PETTY UBLI GIN REIMBURSEMENT 128967 CRC PRESS INC _ _487045 _ ._ VALUE ATION PARTS 12P968 CS COMPANY i149.20 � -�-VALVE-PARTS- -�---"--- ----_-- -- 128969 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE f701.16 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128970 CAL.S CAMERAS AND VIDEO _ - f104.49_ _ CAMERA REPAIRS 128971 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $29,237.71 - ENGINEERING SERVICE9'P1-38;'P1-34--'"'-"__-""-' 128972 CENTURY PAINT $215.31 PAINT BUPPLI68 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST VURBIN6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3131193 PALE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANbL COUNTY . . CLAIMS PAID C4/07/93 POSTING DATE U4/47/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126973 CENTURY SAFETY INST A SUIP f14.b6O.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES 120974 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING 96.818.25 STORAGE UNIT 128975 COLICH AMU SONS 11.774.936.40 CONSTRUCTION I-9 126976 COLLEGE PLACEMENT COUNCIL f237.05 SUBSCRIPTION 128977 COMPRESSOR - COMPONENTS OF CA 92.605.00 FITTINGS 128978 COMPUSA. INC. 305.3E COMPUTER SUPPLIES 128979 CONNELL ON PARTS / DIY $16.37 TRUCK PARTS 12898C CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL UIST $6.735.27 ELECTRIC PARTS 128981 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $1.200.52 TOOLS 128962 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $1.616.25 CHLORINE M.0.30-9-91 128983 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC 31.06b.0u INSTRUMENT PARTS 128984 COSTAR CORP $198.26 LAB SUPPLIES 128985 STATE BOARD OF EQUILIZATION $255.47 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEES 126986 DAPPER TIRE $516.51 TIRES GLASS _ . .. .. _. ._. 128988 DC GUELLE L SUNS GLASS CO S167.88 LAB SUPPLIES I28989 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS f1B9.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS 128990 DELTRON INC i169.84 ITT 12B990 OE2UPIK AND/OR CS CD $6.904.25 ANIONIC M VALVES = 126991 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $3,867.75 ANIONIC POLYMER N.O.8-12-92 T--T 128992 OIFILIFPO ASSOCIATES /1.293.u4 PRINTING UJ 128993 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 31.154.30 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 128994 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $3.393.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 128995 DUNN EDN ARDS COMP i318.43 PAINT SUPPLIES 12899E DIVALS SALES 5132.9E ." _ . . FITTINGS _ _...._ _._._... U 128999 EIM CO/MIS SUPPLY $2.226.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES N ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-44 12899E EMA SERVICES INC - i2$192.11 _ 128999 E S S i192.i1 LAB BDPPLIBE -" 129000 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING $715.10 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129001 EASTMAN INC 36.732.08._._ .. OFFICE SUPPLIES 229002 ELECTRO-TEST INC 1915.04 -ELECTRICAL 88RVIC88 129003 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES $3,542.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 129004 ENCHANTER INC 53A920.00._. _ WERE MONITORING M.0.6-30-92 129005 JOSEFH EVANS 52.500.00 - DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 129006 CHARLES EVANS A ASSOC. $59,201.00 CONSULTING 88RVIC88 - LAB 129007 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S3.900.60_ RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 _ _. .. ..__. 12900E FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 1716.75 AIR"FRBIGHT__.PROPANE 129 FERNEELGPS i68.10 129CIOC10 FISCP EP A PORTER CO 19.513.14 CHLORINATION PARTS ._. LAB SUPPLIES'" 129012 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $ $73.54 LAB SUPPLIES 129013 FISONS INSTRUMENTS f73.51 CONCRETE CUTTING 129C13 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. ,129.04_. ..__. —CONCRETE PARTS 129C14 FLU-SYSTEMS f3.129.0E 129C15 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 461.03 FILM 129017 THE FOKBURO CO $2,404.96 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES '- '" OFPICB-80PPLI88 - __.._.. _..._ ._.. ._ ...._. _. .. 129C17 GET. INC. i2.1U4.96 LUMBER/NAROWARE 129F18 44 Np XL LUMBER CO $B 65.22 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST UURKI46 CAPITAL PKOCESSIN6 DATE 3131193 PA&L 3 A LPORT NUMBER AP93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNT; CLAIMS PAID 04/07/93 POSTING DATE 04/O7/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMUUNT DESCRIPTION 129019 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY 66.U17.78 CMBMICALB ' 129620 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUIPLY CO. A1.291.9i INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129021 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $170.24 TELEPHONE SERVICES '- 129022 BIERLICH-MITCHELL INC S1.5bT.52 PUMP PARTS 129023 N GLANTZ A SON 1585.75 BUILDING MATERIALS 129G29 DON GREEK A ASSOCIATLS 11.755.00 SUPPORTING SERVICES H.0.6-30-92 ' 129025 NB TYPE A GRAPHICS 11.292.79 PRINTING 129026 HACH COMPANY $325.22 LAB SUPPLIES 129027 PL PAWN CO INC $207.03 FILTERS - ' 129028 HELLO $252.70 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT 129C29 MUERGIGLR CVS CALIF I $211.31 COMPRESSOR PARTS 129030 RC HOFFMAN MISR ISC0 690.95 LAB SUPPLIES 129031 RS HUGHES CO INC 176..OL PAINT SUPPLIES 129032 HUNTIN6TON BEACH RUbbLR SIR $1.163.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES 229033 MUHTIN6TON VALLEY SCMWINN L $77.49 BICYCLE PARTS " 129034 IBC 66.i9b.63 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES T+T 129035 IMPERIAL LEST CHEMICAL ieSN23.29 ,. FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O. 11-18-92 X 129G36 INDUSTRIAL THREADCO PRUDUCTS 31•♦73.23 CONNECTORS 2 129C37 ISI INFORTEKT $25.00 FREIGHT 129038 INGRAM PAPER $3,801.A2 OFFICE SUPPLIES UO NCIIOPICNE RRADBR LEASE - .. .. _.. .. 129039 JLAGREAT CREDIT N S a1R5.132 6 1290AP GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPF 1931.1E JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129011 JAV'S SUSPENSION i)9B.03 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE n 129062 JOH•S SUSPENSION SERVICE A33.CO TRUCE IC SUPPLIES -- - - - � 129 N] JON.USTONE SUPPLY R20.31 ELECTRIC BVPPLI68 W 1290A9 JON ES DHENIDALE INC 52.035.63 CXEMICAW 129065 KETTENDURG MARINE $71.08 _ LAB SUPPLIES.._ 129066 KING WEARING INC 6"9.51 NAMES BUPPLI68 229047 KNOK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLILS 52,773.18 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129098 MARTIN KOROICK SN 13.298.25 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 129049 TNL LAST WORD 1855.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 129050 LATHAN. JONES A LYE. LAWYERS $733.50 LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER IND. 129C51 LEGI-TECH $320.00 PUBLICATION - 129052 LEE A NO CONSULTING LNGR $18,687.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-30-5 129053 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 48.562.71 'TRIP FIELD SAMPLING PROGRAM 129054 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL 4933.33 - OC6AM MONITOI1INfi - 129055 NOT BIOLOGIC CONPANV $255.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129056 NEC ANALYTICAL 5YSTENS INC. 11.818.62 LAB SERVICES 129057 MPS $223.74 PROM IURPHIC SERVICES - --' ' 129058 NSA 146.93 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129059 MAINTENANCL PRODUCTS INC $2.323.53 MECHANICAL PARTS 129060 HARVAC ELECTRONICS 192.87 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES — -- - " - — "' - 129061 MATT - CHLOR INC $034.54 CHLORINATION PARTS 129062 MCGANRY CLNTRAL TYPLURITLM 1 6496.7L OFFICE EQUIPMENT 129063 MEMOREX 6357.71 LAB BUPPLI68 12906E HICROAGE OF CLNRITOS 1985.47 OFFICE EQUIPMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/93 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION 61STAILTS Of UNAN6E COUNTY CLAIMS PAID C4/67/93 POSTING DATE 44/67/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129065 MIDWAY MFG E MACHINING S23.229.20 MECHANICAL PARTS 129066 MINNLSOTA WESTLRN Y15UAL TRES. S.7.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129067 MISSION INDUSTRIES P6.222.6G UNIFORM SERVICE 1.9068 MLAOEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $16.746.97 CONSTRUCTION 2-30 129069 MONTGOMERY WATSON 812.923.53 RNGIN88RING SERVICES 129070 MOORE S TABER $24,750.00 BACKFILLING SERVICES 129071 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC $166.96 HARDWARE 129072 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION AS 5173.26 BOOKS _ 129073 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDL A $82.00 SUBSCRIPTION 129074 THE OMMART CORP $934.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129075 OR SYSTEMS CO "S.913.0. CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 129076 OMEGA ENGINEERING. INC $1,261.78 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129077 ON-LINE ELECTRONICS S2D7.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 129078 ORACLE CORPORATION 41.00.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 129079 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $119.24 TRUCK PARTS 129080 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO S1.534.83 CHEMICALS 129081 ORANGE COURIER S133.50 COURIER SERVICE8 _ m 129082 ORANGE VALVE L PITTING CO. $1.875.50 FITTINGS S 129083 OSCAR-S LOCK A SAFE $117.62 SECURITY BBRVICBS -+ 129084 OXYGEN SERVICE 52.560.1c. SPRCIALTY CRASHES 129085 COUNTY OF ORANGE S5.760.00 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 12908E COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SB.C33.69 WORKERS COMP DISTRIBUTION 129087 PC SYSTEMS DES16N _ .. _ 8995.65 COMPUTER HARDWARE a 129088 PSSI $2.284.55 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 129089 PACIFIC PARTS 32,768.54 INSTRUMENTATION r 129090 PACFC SAFETY EQUIPMENT. CO ._ S101.96 _ SAFETY SUPPLIES 129091 PACIFIC SEWER NAINTENANCL C $2.714.00 SEWER REPAIRS 129092 PACIFIC BELL $651.93 TELEPHONE SERVICES 129093 FACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS " . 0.734.00 .__ TBLBPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 129094 PROBE JANITORIAL SUPP $235.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129095 PALMIERI. TYLEM. 61LNER. 6866.60 LEGAL BBRVICBS 24-1-IA 129096 PARAGON CABLL .. . 336.70 CABLE SERVICES 129097 PARTS UNLIMITED 5112.7E TRUCK PARTS 129098 ROBERT PETERS $296.42 GARNISIMBNT OVERPAYMENT 129099 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $162.168.13 _ RESIDUALS RBNYVAL M.0.5-8-91 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 129101 PITNEY BOWES CREDIT COMP $190.51 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129102 POLYME7fl ICIN INC. 15,172.45 129103 POLYPURC INC $1S.172.49 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 129103 HAROLNTI TION PRODUCTS 2596.00 "' OFFICE"SUPPLIES 129144 MROCES PRIMROSE ICL 564.18 ICE 129166 PROCESS NAL LQUIPMLNT COMPANY .099.14 _ PUMP BKRR ARTS 12916E PROFESSIONAL AI SERVICE IRO. 52.099.14 GROUNDBKBBPING-SUPPLIES 1291LT THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 94.464.16 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 129108 WUESTRON CORP 85.432.50 LAS SUPPLIES _ 129109 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES INC S29.687.76 COMPUTER SERVICES M.O.8-12-92- —" - ' "'- ---"` 129110 R N CONTROLS S151.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/93 PAGE 5 A EPYNT NUMUER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OP ORANGE COUNT' _.. .. CLAIMS PAID U1/67/93 POSTING DATE 04/07/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129111 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO S109.91 LAB SUPPLIES 129112 RED VALVE CO INC f555.11 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129113 REDI EXPRESS 369.3U MESSENGER SERVICES _ 129114 REISH MARINE STUDIES. INC f566.W. OCEAN MONITORING 129115 MCJUNKIN-REFUBLIC SUPPLY f3.123.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIER _ 129116 ROUINSON FENTILIZLH CO 51.331.79 CHEMICALS 129117 ROSEMUUNT ANALYTICAL 6919.1A INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129110 SAFETY-MLLEN CORA 62.82S.50 PARTS CLEANER 129119 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 3533.b0 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129120 SANTA BANK 32.956.00 CONSTRUCTION RETSNTION 2-30 - 129121 DOUG SARVIS $375.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 129122 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L $36,701.53 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 129123 C 0 WINANT PH U $1.300.00 OCEAN MONITORING 229124 SLA-BIND ELECTRONICS INC $1,713.40 LAD SUPPLIES 129126 SENTEA SYSTEMS INC $10.600.05 .. INSTRUMENT - _. ... .. . . _ ... 12912E SMASTA ELECTRIC 3$6,966.30 R TRIC SERVICES >< 129128 SILVERS I SALES _ f6$102.30. _ _ AB HARDWARE X 129120 SILVERS INSTRUMENTATION - 3102.71 LAB BUPPLI68'- s 129129 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO S972.11 LAB SUPPLIES '-' 129330 SILVERI A LE BOUEf 1733.50 CONSTRUCTION7-14-1-1 .. 12913 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLi s190. PRE-ENT NT PHYSICAL SKEWS' --I 129132 SLIDE MASTER f13l.12 12 PRESENTATION AIDE 229177 SMITH-ENTRY CO ;1 S630.00___.__ _PEIMI TESTING n - - _ PERMIT PBES__.__. ...— 129131 SO COAST AIR TRAINING i630.00 1jU 129135 SCAYMD UPDATE TRA tN INC i691.67 TRAINING REGISTRATION 129136 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO . .. i/03.107.60_ __ POWER 129137 SO CAL GAS CO -- _ - s10.508.03 _ NATURAL -_ " _.. ... ._. . __.__.. . . .. .__._ .._. 129138 THL TRANS COMPANY 4700.&0 TRAINING REGISTRATION 129139 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO 59.200.17.. DIESEL FUEL 129110 STARLING INSTRUMENT CO INC s250.00 METER L29111 STAMEN 2 Si ASSDUC PC $3.228.00 INSTRUMENT 96RVICBS 129112 SPECIALIZED T I PRODUCTS CO $1.380.85_ INSTRUMENT 129113 SPEC TECH INC f932.19 �� MELDING SUPPLIES 129111 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS s525.00 LAB EGUIPMBNT INSTALLATION 129145 SUMMIT STEEL 11,700,26. HETAL 12911E SUNSET FOND $19.21 . TRUCE PARTS.._....___._.._ 129117 SUPELCO INC $177.9595 LAB BUPPLI68 129118 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS f155.16 JANITORIAL BUPPLI68 ENGRAVING 129119 T8T NAMEPLATE s ENG RAYING CO 3117.65 ENGIN66RING-9ERVICEH 129150 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMPANY $2,229.62 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 129152 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $335.52. MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 129152 TONT•S LOCK 3 SAFE SERVICE $154.79 SECURITY SERVICES - - - "- ''"- -- --- 129153 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO $3.124.4. CONTRACT GROUNDSKESPING M.O.I1-13-91 129154 TRANSERA CORP/NTH INTERNATION. 9575.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 12915 TRA 'ION INC 977.55 .. INSTRUMENT PARTS. .. _ . .. . .. .... . __. __ . 129156 TRAVEL EL E%LCUTIYCS 31.195.1E TRAVEL 86RVIC68 FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/93 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CUUNIV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF DRAMbL COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 44/67/93 POSTING DATE 09'/01/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT UESCRIPTION 129157 TRUCK f AUTU SUPPLY INC S1.G60.O6 TRUCK PARTS 129158 JG TUCKER G SON INC 34.498.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS _ 129159 TUSTIN DODGE $253.18 TRUCK PARTS 129160 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $3,360.64 LAB SERVICES 129161 TYLAN GENERAL 52.592.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129162 UHLER, INC 5252034.22 CONSTRUCTION 5-32, 5-33 129163 THE UNISOURCE CORE 5399.bO OFFICE SUPPLIES 129164 UNITED PARCEL SLKVILL t522.63 PARCEL SERVICES 129165 UNITED TAPE CORPORATION 363.9E SAFETY VIDEO RENTALS 129166 VWR SCIENTIFIC 51.359.29 LAB SUPPLIES 129167 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO - i159.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129160 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $410.53 LAB SUPPLIER 129169 VERVE-S PLUMBING fi.045.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 129170 WATER ENVIRONMENT FED. S16T.61 PUBLICATION 129171 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23,442.58 CAUSTIC SODA N.O.E-12-92 129172 ROURKE 6 WOODRUFF f OR 613.494.00 LEGAL BERVICBS M.O.2-19-92 129173 XEROX CORP 32 ABS.80 COPIER LARGER f71 LAB SUPPLIES. ._. 129174 GEORGE VANDLLY CO t996.69 S 129175 GEORGE YARDLEY CO 3267.77 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES '—' 119176 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS f254.U5 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES fA OFFICE SUPPLIES 129I1TS RICHGRO YOUNG Yp00 573.79 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 12978 2ENOGRAPHICS f36.27 a 1 ----------------- 10T AL CLAIMS i1iU 41/47/93 f3.649.933.7O SUMMARY AMOUNT - 11 OPER FUND $427.97 12 OPER FUND $2,900.21 02 CAP PAC FUND $23,557.11 13 OPER FUND 617,875.5E 13 CAP FAC FUND $796.55 /S OPSR FUND $1.194.00 15 CAP FAC FUND $255,721.62 46 OPBR FUND $292.61 17 OPRR FUND $31,242.06 17 CAP PAC FUND 610;772.99 - - - "' --- - -- - - -- - OIL OPEN FOND $461.19 113 OPEN FUND $95.61 114 CAP FAC FUND 639,938.9E -' - - - - - - -- 15G6 OPSR FUND $4,149.92 1586 GP FAC FUND $24,216.23 1667 OPER FUND $2,205.88 - 07R16 OPER FUND 69,650.5E JT OPEN FUND $956,513.63 CORF 62,087,962.8E -' - -' -- - — -----� - BELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $8,033.69 JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL FUND $231,944.79 ------------- . ._ . _. _ _... .. . ... `,609,933.70 I !` FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/15/93 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 09/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129197 AS TECH COMPANY 928.961.79 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.30-8-91 12919E A T L T $4,913.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 129199 ADVANCE SCALE CO $136.00 SCALE REPAIRS 229200 AGGREK0. INC 321.181.72 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT 129201 AIR PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL IN $52,296.00 O&M AGREEMENT OZY. GEN. SYST H.0.8-9-89 129202 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 35,868.00 SEWER REPAIRS DIET 7 129203 ANIKTER - DISTRIBUTION $106.48 ERE SUPPLIES 129204 ANODYNE INC 53.000.OV ECSA DEPOSIT REFUND 129205 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $753.78 NOTICE 6 ADS 129206 ARATER SERVICES INC 31.589.89 UNIFORM RENTALS 129207 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 31032.30 INSTRUMENT PARTS 229208 ARMOR - VAC 5596.00 STREET SWEEPING 129209 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP 5397.73 ELECTRIC PARTS 129210 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC 5300.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE HAULING _ 129211 ART WORKS 5177.60 FRAMING SERVICES 129212 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. 5130.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 129213 ASSOCIATED DIESEL $606.15 FILTER X 129214 BAR LANDFILL 33.977.2E RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 = 129215 BMF CORP. FIRE PROTECTION CO 3300.00 PIPE REPAIRS 129216 BRW SAFETY A SUPPLY $1.932.76 SAFETY SUPPLIES 00 129217 BAKERS SQUARE IS22 3300.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 129210 BANANA BLUEPRINT $17,992.66 PRINTING 129219 BANK OF THE WEST $2.937.49 CONSTRUCTION RSTBNTI0N J-23-2 w 129220 B BATEMAN 37G2.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129221 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 3551.88 BATTERIES 129222 BAUER COMPRESSOR 391.57 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS _ 129223 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 97.497.77 LAB SUPPLIES - - 129224 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $898.00 SERVICE AGRESMENTB 129225 BELL SECURITY SLIOL4.15 ._ TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES 129226 BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. 919.46 - LAB SUPPLIER - -- 129227 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 3590.20 RADIATOR REPAIRS 129226 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP 55.655.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 129229 BRINDERSOM CORP $16,210.05 - CONSTRUCTION - PIPE SPOOLS 129230 BUDGET JANITORIAL 21,650.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129231 GARY 6 STREED $R.173.81 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 129232 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY S92T.66 - OFFICE SUPPLIES ' - - - 129233 CEPA S1.lOB.86 LAB SUPPLIES 129236 C.G.I. SYSTEMS 11,208.95 RELAY REPAIR 129235 C M 1 3323.69 - - ELECTRICAL REPAIRS _ - - 129236 CPC PRESS INC 9388.27 LAS SUPPLIES 129237 IS COMPANY $517.45 GAUGE 12923E CALTROL INC $5,723.78 INSTRUMENTS -- 129239 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC 5677.03 TRUCK REPAIRS 129250 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE 385.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129241 CALIF. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS 3399.39 FITTINGS 129242 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS S79.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15193 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 64/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129243 JOHN CAROLED ENGINEERS t8.473.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38 129244 CENTURY SAFETY INST t SUPP 33.832.20 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129245 CHROME CRANKSHAFT INC $370.00 MACNINE SUPPLIES 129246 CHURCH ENGINEERING INC $8.456.17 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-R1 129247 CITY OFFICE FURNITURE INC 3412.54 OFFICE FURNITURE _ 129295 CLEVELAND COTTON PROD $134.16 LAB SUPPLIES 129249 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $72.57 SERVICE AGREEMENT 129250 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO 31D4.89 LAB SUPPLIES 129251 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $5.333.63 HARDWARE 129252 COMPUTER GRAPHICS GROUP 36.675.11 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 129253 COMPUSA. INC. $3.813.26 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 129254 COMPUSERVE 924.20 COMPUTER SERVICES 129255 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIV t17.12 TRUCK PARTS 129256 CON-WAY WESTERN EXPRESS $67.41 FREIGHT 129257 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 31.448.25 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 129258 CONSUL IDATED FREIGHTYAYS 91.727.70 FREIGHT 129259 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO $282.46. LAB SUPPLIES Fn 129260 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 31.390.8E TOOLS Z 129261 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C t6.7E5.00 SOILS REPORT 129262 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $E22.E6 TRUCK PARTS CG 129263 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 3188.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 12926E CYBE REX 523.83 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129265 UNIVERSITY UNION :215.50 TRAINING REGISTRATION LT1 129266 DAILY PILOT 9515.00 NOTICES 6 JUDE 129267 DAMES L MOORE 13.651.27 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3 N 129268 J.Y. D•ANGELO CO INC S2.507.31 PPIPE PARTS BUPPLI66 129269 DATA VIZ INC 950.00 LAB 129270 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 229271 DE GUELLE 3 SONS GLASS CO •9E1.53 GLASS 129272 DELPHIN COMPUTER SUPPLY 3iE0.9E OFFICE SUPPLIES - 129273 DENVILLE SCIENTIFIC INC $101.97 LAB SUPPLIES 12927E DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO $1,022.67 VALVE 129275 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 35,788.61 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.9-12-92 129276 DIFILIPPU ASSOCIATES $E.059.12 PRIMTING 129277 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP i23.677.63 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 229278 DISCO PRINT COMPANY 1905.00 INSTRUMENT 129279 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN 4742.50 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL 129280 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC 37.6E5.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 129281 ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC $5.E00.00 INSURANCE CONSULTANT 129282 DUNN EDWARDS CORP $E91.13 PAINT SUPPLIES 129283 D•VALS SALES 6231.08 FITTINGS 12928E EIMCO PROCESS EQUIP CO $1,874.85 MECHANICAL PARTS 129285 ESP NORTH $85.03 ELECTRIC PARTS 229286 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING $375.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES 22926T EASTMAN INC $9.106.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129288 ECOANALYSIS INC $45.E80@80 COMPLIANCE DATABASE SYST M.0.1-13-93 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129289 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES $3.703.06 ELECPRICAL SERVICES 129290 EMERGENCY LIFELINE INC 35,326.00 EMERGENCY SUPPLIES 129291 ENCHANTER INC 94.486.00 OCRAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 129292 ENGINEERED COMFORT SYSTEMS $1.067.80 ELECTRIC PART 129293 ENTECH LAB AUTOMATION S9.845.55 LAB SUPPLIES 129294 ELT $1,386.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129295 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC 1582.00 LAB SAMPLES 129296 ERSHIGS INC 3286.08 FITTINGS _ 129297 ESSENCE GROUP 3375.27 COMPUTER PARTS 12929E EXCHANGER WORKS DIV. $1.817.13 MECHANICAL PARTS 129299 MARSHALL FAIRRES $128.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129300 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5,960.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.30-9-91 129301 CHEMWEST INC 52.317.78 EQUIPMENT 129302 FILTER SUPPLY CO 51.163.37 FILTERS 129303 FIRE MASTER 53.297.27 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129304 FIRST COMPANY 5256.45 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES m 129305 FISCHER S PORTER CO $5,273.56 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES X 129306 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 3925.62 LAB SUPPLIES S 129307 FLUID HANOLING SYSTEMS $1.074.21 PUMP 1" 129308 CLIFFORD A FORKERY $2,956.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 129309 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $6,329.40 WATER USE --1 229310 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $739.60 PAINT SUPPLIES 129311 FREDSON RV SUPPLY $77.48 TRUCK PARTS i 129312 FREEDOM IMAGING $576.46 LAB EQUIPMENT W 129313 8U0 FRET 942.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129314 CITY OF FULLERTON $39.00 WATER USE 129315 GET. INC. $107.21 - OFFICE SUPPLIES " 229316 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO $580.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 129317 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $5.004.92 TELEPHONE BERVICES 129316 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC S29.2119.01 MECHANICAL"PARTS 129319 GLOBAL ENGINEERING $136.82 LAB SUPPLIER 129320 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS SL29.3J CANERA 129321 GREAT AMERICAN FRINTING $10,022.63 PRINTING 129322 DON GREEK L ASSOCIATES $520.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 129323 HBO TECHNOLOGY 3114.562.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2, P2-44 129324 MAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 3143.97 TRUCK PARTS 129325 MACH COMPANY $206.15 TEST KIT 129326 FRED A HARPER 41.500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129327 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTI 51.578.38 FILTER PARTS ' 129328 NAULAWAY CONTAINERS 91.620.00 CONTAINER RENTALS 129329 HAUSER ENGINEERING $1.071.00 LAD SERVICES 129330 PL HAWN CO INC 93,696.85 FILTERS 129331 HELLO 4191.05 TELEPHONE SUPPLIES 129332 J.M. HEMP L ASSOC 3H0.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 129333 G. PATRICK MERSHELMAN 3333.18 DEFERRED COMP PAY-OFF 129334 HILTI INC S495.65 ELECTRIC PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 9 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 64/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129335 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE $2.882.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129336 HOERSIGER CVS CALIF INC 1129.27 COMPRESSOR PARTS 129337 HOKE CONTROLS DIV/HONE♦ INC. 1136.23 VALVE 129338 HORIZON HIGH REACH L EQUIP $439.58 TRUCK PARTS 129339 RS HUGHES CO INC $207.22 HARDWARE 129340 HUNTER CORPORATION $56,074.50 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 129341 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $16.33 WATER USE 129342 HUNT-S FINAL PHASE 327.035.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 129343 IND MECHANALTSIS 12.146.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129341 ISC 35.616.00 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES 129345 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $48.999.09 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 129346 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 51.191.11 CONNECTORS 129347 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. %342.,3 TRUCK PARTS 129340 PACTEL TELETRAC 34.208.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 129349 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $145.70 WATER USE 129350 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP $275.48 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129351 KAMAN BEARINGS 6 SUPPLY f28.99 HARDWARE 129352 KEENAN SUPPLY 9221.68 VALVES X 129353 KING BEARING INC $87.07 HARDWARE S 12935, KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2.074.89 ELECTRIC PARTS 129355 MARTIN KOROICK SR $1.333.30 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 129356 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO $72.30 CELLULAR TELEPHONE 88RV. AGREEMENT 129357 LA TRONICS $80.01 CAMERA 129358 LEE 6 RO CONSULTING ENGR 119.567.07 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38-5 w 129359 LEUPOLD L STEVENS 2284.24 CHARTS DEFERRED COMP DEPOSIT J= 129361 LINE OLN NATIONAL LIFE INS. CO. $1,825.00 _ 129362 KP LANGELES INC i1$162.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 129363 LOSMAC NALD-ST TIMES i112.59 SUBLAR SERPTION VICES 129363 MAINTENAN-STE PRODU LAB $6.900.00 _ LAB ANRVIC89 129365 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC ,6.900.23 MECHANICAL PARTS 129366 MANHOLE ADJUSTING 12$437.65 MANHOLE ADJUSTING 12936E MARINE L VALVE SUPPLY i,37.13 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 12936B MATT - ICHLORNSTRUMENTS INC A1.$64.75 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 12936E MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS 07.75 LAB SUPPELECTRIC CE9 129370 MCXINLLY EQUIPMENT CORP $267.73 BLSCTRIC CART PARTS 129371 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO $727.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129372 MICRO MOTION f727.00 IITTINMBNT PARTS 129373 MIDWAY MFG L MACHINING $3.860.00 FITTINGS 129373 MISSION ICSABRASIVE f]$134.82 IISCELLANT PARTS 129375 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES L13,.82 UNIFORM RENTS SUPPLIES 229376 MISSION INDUSTRIES UME $3$075.00 UNIFORM RENTALS 12937E HITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO ,575.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129378 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION f58.662.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-30 12937E CITY OF ELECTRIC BEACH 66.53 HATER USE 129380 OFFICIAL ELECTRIC VEHICLES i67.066JM ELECTRIC CARTS M.0.1-13-93 129380 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE A ,U2.Op SUBSCRIPTION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15193 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITA710N DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04,11/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129382 DX SYSTEMS CO $23,336.30 CHLORINE M.0.30-9-91 129362 ON LINE SOLUTIONS _ $430.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 129383 OPAMP TECHNICAL BOOKS $62.64 LAB SUPPLIES 129384 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $241.02 TRUCK PARTS 229385 ORANGE VALVE A FITTING CO. $1,670.32 FITTINGS 129386 ORITEX CORP 31.286.02 MACHINE PARTS 129307 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,458.45 SPECIALTY GASES 129380 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4,310.64 SERVICE AGREEMENT - RADIOS 129389 COUNTY SANITATIDN DISTRICT $23.846.52 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT 129390 PGC SCIENTIFIC$ CORPORATION 3310.95 LAB SUPPLIES 129391 PSS1 $2,121.86 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 129392 PACIFIC PARTS $80.81 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129393 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 31.069.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129394 PACIFIC BELL 359.14 TBLEPHONE SERVICES 129395 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $1,462.66 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 129396 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPP $5,934.87 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129397 PAGENET 3T2.50 PAGER RENTALS m 129398 PAK WEST 366.96 PACKING BOXES = 129399 PARAGON CABLE 336.78 CABLE SERVICES 129400 PARTS UNLIMITED $819.55 TRUCK PARTS 129401 ROY PENDERGRAFT $460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129402 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION 31.241.82 LAS SUPPLIES 129403 PERMA SEAL 3864.52 HARDWARE W 129404 PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS INC $3.641.42 CHEMICALS 129405 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $156.083.63 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 EY 229406 PIIN BONE$ $215.3O 129407 POLY FABRICS 3193.95 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 129408 POLYPURE INC 313.472.95 CATIONIC POLYMER H.0.3-11-92 129409 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO $66.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 129410 PRECISION INDUSTRIES $2.095.95 - INSTRUMENT PARTS 129411 MIKE PURLICH 9 SONS $14,040.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-35-2 129412 PROGRAMMER'S CONNECTION $74.35 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 129413 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CD. $3,968.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 129414 QUESTRON CORP 393.00 LAS SUPPLIES 229425 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES INC $1,187.06 COMPUTER SERVICES 129416 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO $1,569.41 TRASH REMOVAL 129417 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO $1,162.69 LAB SUPPLIES 129410 THE REGISTER 179.95 NOTICES 6 A]13 129419 REISH MARINE STUDIES, INC 51.160.00 OCEAN MONITORING - 129420 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYST $5,000.00 POSTAGE 129421 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $3,586.72 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 229422 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CORP $929.80 LAID SUPPLIES 129423 ROSEMOUNT INC. 32,920.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS 229424 PEGGY WILCOX $5.552.18 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129425 RUSSELL•S CONST. CO. 3300.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 129426 S.S. MECHANICAL $22,309.20 CONSTRUCTION PI-33-1 I FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129427 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $479.54 ELECTRIC PARTS 129428 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1.828.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129429 SANTA BANK $6,529.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30 129430 DOUG SARVIS $375.80 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 129431 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L 517.676.95 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 129432 SCIENTIFIC ELECTRONICS SERV. $1.294.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129433 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES INC $2,047.25 SPECIALTY GASES 129434 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS INC $334.00 LAB SUPPLIES 129435 SECURITY SPECIALISTS 3160.00 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 129436 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2,039.33 TOOL PARTS 129437 SHURELUCK SALES $7,786.40 FITTINGS 129439 SLIDE MASTER $56.03 SLIDES 129439 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP S323.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129440 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $1,260.00 PERMIT FEES 129441 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $1.890.00 PERMIT FEES 129442 $O CALIF ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 6120.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 129443 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $17.064.57 POWER m 129444 SO CAL GAS CO $15.579.24 NATURAL GAS X 129445 SOUVENIR PHOTO 6672.77 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 129446 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 62,342.41 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS Ip 129447 STAMEN Z SPASSOFF PE 56.720.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-29-2 - 129448 WESTALLOT INC 735.91 ELECTRIC PARTS 129449 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC :597.47 . PLUMBING SUPPLIES . 229450 SPEX INDUSTRIES INC 3326.b2 LAB SUPPLIES 229451 SPYGLASS INC $157.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE m 129452 SRECO FLEXIBLE 41,283.36 HOSE 129453 SUMMIT STEEL 31.055.61 METAL 129454 SUN ELECTRIC CORP $649.90 TRUCK PARTS 129455 SUPELCO INC $1.152.22 LAB SUPPLIES 129456 SYNANTEC CORP 578.86 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 129457 TEKDRAULICS 3674.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129458 TEKTRONIX INC $804.89 LAB SUPPLIES 129459 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL $340.35 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129460 CHARLES E THOMAS 5241.46 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 129461 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 3360.91 OIL 6 GREASE 129462 TONT•S LOCK 6 SAFE SERVICE 5347.41 KEYS/LOCKS 129463 TRANSMATION INC 41,281.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129464 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES 6206.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-30-92 129465 TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY INC $142.64 TRUCK PARTS 129466 TRUESDAIL LABS 575.00 LAB SERVICES 129461 JG TUCKER A SON INC $314.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129468 TTLAN GENERAL 53.993.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129469 US AUTO GLASS CENTLRS $164.57 TRUCK PARTS 129470 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $967.00 LAB SUPPLIES 129471 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 3789.91 PARCEL SERVICES -- 129472 US DEPT OF COMMERCE MIT $31.5D PUBLICATION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 129473 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,031.59 LAB SUPPLIES 129474 VAL1N CORPORATION $861.66 REGULATOR PARTS 129475 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $5,022.08 PLUMING SUPPLIES 129476 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL f252.00 MOTOR REPAIRS 129477 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $827.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 129478 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 11.628.17 LAD SUPPLIES 129479 VERTEX SYSTEMS 61t G07,50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 129480 VILLAGE NURSERIES $375.81 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 129481 CARL WARREN 4 CO $300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 129482 WEATHER AND WINO INSTRUMENT 3290.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES 129483 WEST COAST ENVIRONMENTAL $2,371.10 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 129484 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 520,302.97 CAUSTIC SODA H.G.8-12-92 129485 WESTIN ENGINEERING 5540.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 129486 ROURKE L WOODRUFF 4 SPRAOLIN 361,676.39 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 129487 XEROX CORP fT.S19.29 COPIER LEASES - - 129488 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $445.31 VALVES 129489 RICHARD 8 EDGAR 3200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION m ----------------- _. x x TOTAL CLAIMS PA10 09/21/93 f1N 59rT94.i1 w SUMMARY AMOUNT V N1 OPER FUND {52.51 42 OPBR FUND 74,412.05 42 OAP PAC FUND $19,699.77 03 OPER FUND j$2,447.04 M3 CAP FAC FUND $4,125.04 R5 OPER FUND 26,641.34 90 N5 CAP FAC FUND j16,$48.49 R6 OPER FOND 349.24 F7 OPER PVND 12,560.84 87 GP FAC FUND {12$924.10 R11 OPER FUND f924.10 _ R14 OPER FUND $54.89 814 CAP FAC FUND $270.95 R566 OPER FUND $53.64 R7614 OPER FUND $302.61 JT OPER FUND $630,705.82 CORP $529,701.49 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FU $30,269.91 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $123,995.89 ------------------- _. $1,459,794.11 V STATE OF CALIFORNIA) j ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on /.t 19 f3 was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 19!?3 .0 IN W�ITNE`SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 141f day of 1993. Penny K i nt Secretary of each of the%6oarqx of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 6 14 of Orange County, California - �. F27A.1