HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-05-12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
R.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
�/ o.yY• 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
'"IIIHII ""ce cW (714)962-2411
May 6, 1993
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. 1. 2. 3. S. 6. 7. 11, 13 & 14
WEDNESDAY MAY 12, 1993 - 7:30 P.M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Califomia
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of
Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and
date.
Assistant li a d e
cretary
Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings:
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, May 19th, at 5:30 p.m.
SPECIAL JOINT WORKS - Wednesday, May 26th, at 4:30 p.m.
SELECTION COMMITTEE RE (immediately preceding the Executive
OCEAN MONITORING Committee meeting)
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE/ - Wednesday, May 26th, at 5:30 p.m.
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
PERSONNEL COMMITTEE - Thursday, May 27th, at 5:30 p.m.
ENGINEERING AND - Wednesday, June 2nd, at 5:30 p.m.
CONSTRUCTION COMMITTEE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
10044 ELLIS AVENUE
PO.BOX 0127 -
MWAIN VALLEY,"LIFORNIA 9212�
P141 98 2-24 11
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings
May May 12, 1993 May 26, 1993
June Jun 09, 1993 Jun 23, 1993
July Jul 14, 1993 Jul 28, 1993
August Aug 11, 1993 None Scheduled
September Sep 08, 1993 Sep 22, 1993
October Oct 13, 1993 Oct 27, 1993
November Nov 10, 1993 None Scheduled
December Dec 08, 1993 None Scheduled
January Jan 12, 1994 Jan 26, 1994
February Feb 09, 1994 Feb 23, 1994
March Mar 09, 1994 Mar 23, 1994
April Apr 13, 1994 Apr 27, 1994
May May 11, 1994 May 25, 1994
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue
C of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 9272E-0127
Telephone: (714)962.2411
JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 12, 1993 - 7:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code
Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the
meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda
item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be
submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in
compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda
posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
(3) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member
agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board
Meeting folders)
(4) EACH DISTRICT
Annual election of Chairmen and Chairmen pro tem of the Boards:
(a) District 1
(b) District 2
(c) District 3
(d) District 5
(a) District 6
(f) District 7
(g) District 11
(h) District 13
(i) District 14
(5) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(6) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific
agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As
determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific
item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
05/12/93
(7) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal
reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These D
reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chairman
(b) Report of General Manager
Ic) Report of General Counsel
(8) EACH DISTRICT
ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following
minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered
by the Chairman:
District 1 - April 14, 1993 regular
District 2 - April 14, 1993 regular
District 3 - April 14, 1993 regular
District 5 - April 14, 1993 regular
District 6 - April 14, 1993 regular
District 7 - April 14, 1993 regular
District 11 - April 14, 1993 regular
District 13 - April 14, 1993 regular
District 14 - April 14, 1993 regular
(9) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint
and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once
and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented
unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See
pages "A" and "B"
40 /07/93 04 21 9
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - S 956,513.63 $630,705.82
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,087,962.84 529,701.49
Joint Working Capital Fund - 131,944.79 123,995.89
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 8,033.69 30,169.91
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 427.97 52.51
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 26,457.32 79,681.69
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 18,672.11 22,146.81
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 256,915.82 20,767.24
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 292.61 48.49
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 41,914.99 20,910.08
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 461.19 924.10
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 95.61 .00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 39,938.96 333.83
DISTRICTS NOS 5 & 6 JOINT - 28,365.75 53.64
DISTRICTS NOS 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,285.88 .00
DISTRICTS NOS 7 & 14 JOINT - 9,650.54 302.61
53.609.933.70 $1.459.794.11 -
-2-
05/12/93
(10) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 1o(a) THROUGH 10(c)
All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as
not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any
particular item is requested to be removed from the consent
calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public
in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these
items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by
one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous
ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All
items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered
in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted
from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the
consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding Purchase of Five Flatbed Trucks,
Specification No. A-168, to Los Angeles Freightliner/GMC for a total
amount not to exceed $115,530.80 plus sales tax. See page C
Ib) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding purchase order contract for
Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals,
Specification No. E-229, for nine systems, to GST, Inc. for a total
amount not to exceed $31,557.25 plus sales tax. See page D
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to
bioMerieux Vitek, Inc. in the amount of $37,130.00, plus sales tax
and freight, for Purchase of bioMerieux Vitek Jr. Bacteria Identification
System, (Specification No. E-230).
-3-
05/12/93
(10) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 21 to the plans
and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant
No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $192,366.00 to the
contract with Hunter Corporation for three items of additional work or
other contract adjustments. See page E
(e) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-45, approving plans and
specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous
Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1 , Job No. P1-38-2, and
authorizing the General Manager to establish May 18, 1993 as the
date for receipt of bids. See page F
(f) Consideration of the following actions relative to Addendum No. 3 to
the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for
design, construction support services and preparation of operation and
maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to
Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional
engineering services for seismic work as provided in the agreement
and to incorporate additional changes in the scope of work:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the
Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for
said services. See page G
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-46, approving Addendum
No. 3 to said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said
additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus
overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed
profit, for an additional amount not to exceed $527,600.00,
increasing the total authorized compensation from an amount
not to exceed $1,991 ,565.00 to an amount not to exceed
$2,519,165.00. See page H
-4- .►
05/12/93
...
(10) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(g) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-47, approving Addendum No. 3 to
the Professional Services Agreement with Dames & Moore, Inc., a
Delaware Corporation, to conduct Seismic Study Element of
Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous
Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, providing
for a reallocation of the costs among categories within said
agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized compensation
of $840,620.00. See page I
(h) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional
Services Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for Facility
Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P11-40-2,
and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-47-2:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Selection
Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said
services. See page J
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-48, approving said
agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for said
services, on an hourly-basis for labor plus overhead, direct
expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total
amount not to exceed $549,000.00. See page K
(i) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to
negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement
with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for planning, design
and construction services in connection with master-planned support
facilities at Plants 1 and 2 (includes Job Nos. J-11-1, J-26, J-27,
P2-23-5-1, P2-35-2, P2-35-3, P2-35-4 and P2-35-5) providing for
changes to the original scope of work.
(j) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit
proposals and negotiate an agreement for Environmental and
Geotechnical Services, Specification No. 5-070, for various collection
system and treatment plant projects to be constructed over the next
three years.
-5-
05/12/93
(10) DISTRICTS 1 & 2 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(k) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Memory Lane Interceptor, Contract No. 2-30,
authorizing a net addition of $78,273.22 to the contract with Mladen
Buntich Construction Company for five items of additional or modified
work. Seepage L
DISTRICT 2
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-51-2, approving an exchange of
ownership Agreement between the City of Placentia and County
Sanitation District No. 2 providing for transfer of ownership of the
Palm Avenue Purchase to the City of Placentia. See page M
DISTRICT 5
(m) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-53-5, accepting Improvements to
Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, as
complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and
approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page N
DISTRICT 7
(n) Consideration of the following actions relative to Abandonment of
Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for said project, granting a time
extension of 33 calendar days to the contract with Silveri &
LeBouef for completion of said work due to inclement weather.
See page O
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-55-7, accepting said project
as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion
and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page P
-6-
05/12/93
(10) DISTRICT 7 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(o) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-56-7, approving and authorizing
execution of Grant of Easement to Crow Winthrop Development for
10' right-of-way required to install a new sewer line over the
northeasterly corner of District's Michelson Pump Station site,
Contract No. 7-11-2 in exchange for a Quitclaim of abandoned sewer
line in a 10' easement located on said site from Crow Winthrop
Development. See page 0
(p) Consideration of motion to receive and file Summons and Complaint
for Order Relieving Petitioner from provisions of Government Code,
Section 945.4, Loyd T. Nitzen, 11 vs. Orange County Sanitation
District, Case No. 708855, relative to an application for leave to file
late claim that was denied by the District in connection with a vehicle
accident in the vicinity where routine sewer maintenance was being
performed in the City of Tustin by District's crews, and authorize the
District's General Counsel to appear and defend the interests of the
District.
DISTRICT 11
`..i (q) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-57-11, approving Amendment
No. 1 to Lease Agreement with General Telephone Company re Slater
Avenue Pump Station, authorizing an extension of lease agreement for
an additional three years at the current rate of $1,900.00 per year.
See page R
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(11) ALLDISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any
-7-
05/12/93
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee and
consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees'
written reports of their meetings on April 21, 1993 and April 28,
1993, respectively (Copies enclosed with Directors' agenda material)
(b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said
Committees:
(1) Consideration of the following actions relative to Advance
Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, and the
Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP):
(a) Consideration of motion approving selection of Orrick,
Herrington and Sutcliffe to serve as special bond counsel
on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation
1993 Series 1, and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate
SWAP, (1993 SWAP), and requesting a fee proposal for
consideration by the Boards at a future meeting.
(b) Consideration of motion approving selection of Rourke,
Woodruff & Spradlin to serve as co-counsel on the
Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation
1993 Series 1, and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate
SWAP, (1993 SWAP), and requesting a fee proposal for
consideration by the Boards at a future meeting.
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing staff
and General Counsel to request that Merrill Lynch,
Districts' underwriter, utilize either the firm of Brown and
Wood or the firm of Jones, Hall, Hill and White to serve
as underwriter's counsel on the Advance Refunding
Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series.
(2) Consideration of the following actions relative to
Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program:
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing staff
and General Counsel to take steps necessary to seek
approval by the State Legislature of an Owner-Controlled
Wrap-Up Insurance Program for Districts' construction
projects.
(b) Considerations of motion authorizing and directing staff
and Robert F. Driver Associates, Districts' insurance
consultant/broker, to report back with further information
on an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program for
Districts' construction projects, a draft of such a plan and
an implementation schedule
[ITEM (12)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 91
-B-
05/12/93
....
021 ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 8)
(b) (3) Consideration of motion declaring the 1993-94 Sewer Use Fees
and Connection Fees will not increase from rates established for
the 1992-93 fiscal year and will continue to be in effect for
1993-94, provided the Governor and State Legislature do not
confiscate Districts' property taxes, as follows:
ANNUAL SEWER USE FEES - 1993-94
District Single-Family Multi-Family Non-Residential
No. Residential Residential Properties
1 $ 83.24 $49.94/Unit $59.52/1,000 SF
2 71.52 42.91/Unit 51.14/1,000 SF
3 73.89 44.33/Unit 52.83/1,000 SF
5 96.75 58.05/Unit 69.1811,000 SF
6 76.47 45.88/Unit 54.68/1,000 SF
7 50.09 30.05/Unit 35.81/1,000 SF
11 60.00 36.00/Unit 42.90/1,000 SF
\� 13 100.00 60.00/Unit 71.50/1,000 SF
14 NONE- District No. 14 is fully funded by IRWD
CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION FEES - 1993-94
DISTRICTS NO, 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 11 & 13
RESIDENTIAL $2,350/DWELLING UNIT
NON-RESIDENTIAL $470/1,000 SQUARE FEET,
$2,350 MINIMUM
DISTRICT NO. 14
NONE - District No. 14 if fully funded by IRWD
[ITEM (12)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 101
-9-
05/12/93
02) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from page 9)
(b) (4) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing staff and
General Counsel to draft an amendment to the Districts'
Ordinance Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative
Fees, Non-Compliance Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous
Charges for introduction and first reading at the regular June
meeting of the Boards of Directors, to adjust or establish said
fees in the amounts determined necessary to recover the
Districts' costs.
(5) Consideration of motion directing that no further study be given
to the issue of modifying sewer connection fees and that no
change be made to the existing policy that does not allow fee
adjustments
(NOTE: District 3 Directors also see separate Agenda
Item No. 34)
(6) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-49, amending Classification
and Compensation Resolution No. 79-20, as amended,
establishing a 1993 Summer Work Program for painting,
grounds maintenance and pump station maintenance work. See
page $
(7) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-50, Urging Equitable
Alloction of Property Taxes and State Support of School
Funding in California before consideration of further Property
Tax Shifts. See page I
(8) Consideration of the following actions relative to Districts' Two-
Way Radio System/County-Wide 800 MHz Radio System:
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing staff to
continue to monitor the progress and development of the
proposed new County-Wide 800 MHz Radio System and
upon receipt of additional information assess the
advisability of the Districts' participation in the system
and report back to the Boards; and, in the interim,
continue to maintain the Districts' existing 453 MHz
Two-Way Radio system in a state of readiness and repair
to meet the Districts' day-to-day and emergency radio
communications needs.
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to Motorola Communications and
Electronics, Inc. in the amount of $38,383.00 plus sales
tax, for Purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment
(Specification No. E-227).
-1a
4
05/12/93
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee and consideration
of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the
meeting on April 27, 1993 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material)
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business
set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,
the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to
consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel
matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or
54957.6.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b)
matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee
compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure
under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by
the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not
available for public inspection. At such time as final actions
are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the
minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information.
(14) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from page 10)
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) Reconvene in regular session
(c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed
session.
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(16) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(17) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
�. -11-
05/12/93
(18) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(19) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(20) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(21) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(22) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(23) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(24) DISTRICT 13
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(25) DISTRICT 13
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(26) DISTRICT 14
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(27) DISTRICT 14
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(28) DISTRICTS 5 & 6
(a) Verbal report of staff
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-52, approving plans and
specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity
Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive,
Contract No. 5-37-4, and authorizing the General Manager to establish
the date for receipt of bids (tentative bid date is June 8, 1993). See
page V
(29) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(30) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-12-
a
05/12/93
(31) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of the following actions relative to Crystal Cove Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-36:
(a) Verbal report of Staff
(b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for said project, making miscellaneous modifications and
clarifications.
(c) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and
specifications for said project, making miscellaneous modifications and
clarifications.
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-54-5, receiving and filing bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Crystal
Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, to Schuler Engineering
Corporation, in the total amount of $993,442.00. See page V
(32) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(33) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(34) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of request to reduce sewer connection charges for Park
Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton (Copies of
requests included with salmon-colored staff report dated April 7, 1993,
attached to the Fiscal Policy Committee Report and Executive Committee
Report enclosed with supporting agenda material)
(a) Discussion
(b) Consideration of the following alternative actions:
[ITEM (34) CONTINUED ON PAGE 141
`.J -13-
05/12/93
e
(34) DISTRICT 3 (Continued from page 13)
(b) (1) Consideration of motion to deny the request and directing that
no further study be given to the issue of establishing a separate
class of sewer connection charges and that no change be made
to the existing policy that does not allow fee adjustments.
(NOTE: District 3 Directors see also separate Agenda
Item (12)(b)(5).)
-or-
(2) Consideration of actions relative to proposed Ordinance
No. 320, An Ordinance of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California,
Amending Ordinance No. 317, Providing for a Separate Class of
Connection Charges for Certain Minimum Size Dwelling Units:
See page W
(a) Consideration of motion making finding that adoption of
said Ordinance is statutorily exempt pursuant to
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Sections 15307 and 15308 in that the Ordinance
establishes regulatory processes to be taken by the �*✓
District to assure the protection of the environment and
natural resources.
(b) Consideration of motion to read said Ordinance No. 320
by title only, and waive reading of entire ordinance (must
be adopted by unanimous vote of Directors present).
(c) Consideration of motion to introduce said Ordinance
No. 320 and pass to second reading and hearing on
June 9, 1993.
(35) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(36) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-14-
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
-� JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
MAY 12, 1993 AT 7:30 P.M.
The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine
items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-
explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the
bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting.
EACH DISTRICT
4: ANNUAL ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN AND CHAIRMAN PRO TEM OF EACH
DISTRICT'S BOARD.
In accordance with the Districts' rules of procedure (see following
excerpt), a Chairman and Chairman pro tem for each District Board is elected
annually at the May meeting.
Excerpt from Rules of Procedure for Meetings
"7. Chairman of the District - A Chairman (and Chairman pro tem) shall
be elected by majority vote as the first order of business by the
members of each District's Board of Directors at the first meeting in
May of each year, and said Chairman (and Chairman pro tem) shall
serve at the pleasure of the majority of said members."
For the information of the new Directors, the Districts' regulations provide
that each Chairman automatically becomes a member of the Executive Committee,
which ordinarily meets monthly at the call of the Joint Chairman. This Committee
also includes the Joint Chairman, Vice Joint Chairman and the representatives of
the County Board of Supervisors. The Executive Committee's function is to study
and make recommendations to the Joint Boards concerning major issues and policy
matters.
May 12, 1993
The current Chairmen and Chairmen pro tam are as follows:
District No. Chairman Chairman oro tem
1 Robert Richardson Fred Barrera
2 Henry W. Wedaa John Collins
3 Sal A. Sapien Burnie Dunlap
5 John C. Cox, Jr. Phil Sansone
6 James A. Wahner Evelyn Hart
7 Charles E. Puckett James A. Wahner
11 Grace Winchell Victor Leipzig
13 John M. Gullixson Fred Berrara
14 Peer A. Swan Leslie A. Pontious
Nominations for Joint Chairman are made at the regular June meeting and
the election takes place at the regular July meeting. Nominations and election of
the Vice Joint Chairman are conducted at the regular July meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS
10(a): AWARD OF FIVE FLATBED TRUCKS. SPECIFICATION NO, A-168.
Five flatbed trucks are needed for the Plant Maintenance, Mechanical
Maintenance and the Collection Facilities Divisions of the Operations and
Maintenance Department. These vehicles will be used for needs in plant piping
work, central power generation system repairs and maintenance, and sewer line
cleaning operations Four will be replacing 1970's vintage trucks. The replaced
vehicles will be sent to auction.
Sealed bids were received on April 15, 1993 for the purchase of the five
flatbed trucks. Six bids were received. The low bid was for $115,530.80 and the
high bid was $124,000.00, plus applicable sales tax.
As part of our program to comply with SCAOMD regulations, the Districts
are investigating the conversion of selected vehicles from gasoline power to liquid
propane or other alternate fuel that will assist in meeting clean air goals versus
-2-
May 12, 1993
V operating on the new reformulated gasolines. The above purchases are therefore
recommended with confirmation from the manufacturer that the vehicles can use
either the reformulated gasolines or be converted to use "clean burn" alternative
fuel.
Staff recommends award be made to Los Angeles Freightliner/GMC, the
lowest responsible bidder, for the Purchase of Five Flatbed Trucks, Specification
No. A-168, for the total price of $115,530.80, plus applicable sales tax.
10(b): AWARD PURCHASE OF MICROCOMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE
AND ASSOCIATED PERIPHERALS, SPECIFICATION NO. E-229.
The Districts utilize microcomputers (also known as personal computers,
or "PCs") for a wide variety of applications, technically and administratively, within
each department and at each of the two treatment plants. Uses include word
processing; spread sheets for data analysis and reporting; data base management
for data collection, analysis, manipulation and storage; data acquisition for
laboratory instruments; data modeling and statistical analysis; graphical data
representation for analysis; and many more. The necessary growth of the Districts'
activities to keep pace with growing system demands and the attendant need for
more sophisticated management and operational "tools" to optimize efficiency and
effectiveness requires periodic purchases of additional microcomputer systems with
related hardware, software and peripheral equipment. Three times each year, staff
prepares a schedule of current computer needs and solicits formal competitive bids.
Sealed bids were opened April 20, 1993 and five bids were received.
Staff recommends award of Specification No. E-229, Purchase of Microcomputer
Hardware, Software and Associated Peripherals, to GST, Inc., Santa Ana, the
lowest responsible bidder, for a total of $31,557.25, plus sales tax.
A total of 9 new systems are needed, together with related peripherals
and equipment. These systems will be allocated as follows:
4CV. Cost Dept./Use
2 $4,583.50 Accounting: Replace obsolete systems for
Principal Account and Financial Technician
0 804.00 Information Services: Upgrade monitor on an
existing system
2 4,765.50 Operations and Maintenance: One system for
supervisor and one system to be used by
engineering interns
-3-
May 12, 1993
0tv. Cost Dept./Use `..�
3 5,849.25 Operations: New systems (one each) for
operations supervisors, and new systems
(one for Plant 1, one for Plant 2) for Training
Section
2 15,555.00 Laboratory: Color notebook computers for
Molecular Biology Section. One each grant
contract with NWRI and one each for training
and meeting demonstrations off site. New
network-connected high speed laser printer
S31 .557.25 Iglus sales taxi
10(c): AWARD PURCHASE OF BIOMERIEUX VITEK JR. AUTOMATED
BACTERIA IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM, SPECIFICATION NO. E-230.
As a part of the Districts' NPDES ocean monitoring program, the
Laboratory Division performs bacteriological analyses on about 8,400 marine water
samples annually. Quality Assurance (QA) procedures require that duplicate
analyses and second-method verification (identification to genus and species) be
performed on at least ten percent of these samples. Currently, the verification
procedure is performed using the manual API system. The API system uses
complex biochemical tests utilizing procedures and a data base devised for medical
laboratory applications. The API methods are labor intensive and the data base is
not always appropriate for identifying microorganisms found in the marine
environment.
To improve our efficiency, accuracy and performance in the second-
method verification, four automated bacteria identification systems were
investigated. These systems included bioMdrieux Vitek Jr., MIDI (Microbial
Identification Systems), Biolog and Microscan. The investigation revealed the
following:
The MIDI microbial identification system is based on fatty acids. The
protocol requires a multistep, 4-hour extraction procedure and uses
hazardous solvents.
The Biolog system does not have a built-in incubator, requires manual
inoculation of isolates into the test cards, and requires 24-hour
incubation.
The Microscan system will not identify bacillus bacteria, and its
companion software program lacks flexibility in identifying atypical
organisms.
-4-
May 12, 1993
The bioM3rieux Vitek Jr. has none of the limitations encountered with
the other systems. This system can identify a wide range of isolates,
including those from environmental sources. Its software is
compatible with environmental isolates and the company will instruct
us on how to tailor the program to meet our needs. It automatically
inoculates the reaction cards, incubates the cards in an internal
incubator, and begins reading the cards after 15 minutes. The
instrument will continue to read biochemical reactions for up to 18
hours, but the majority of isolates are identified in hour hours or less
because of constant interaction between the system and the built-in
incubator. The purchase price includes setup, training, and free
software updates. A 24-hour on-call service engineer is available for
repairs or information.
Payback Analysis (Annual Basis) for bioM6rieux Vitek Jr.
No. of Cost
Analysis Old Method New Method Savings
Labor Materials Total Labor Materials FTtal
840 $8,925 $3,780 $12,705 $1,785 1 $2,940 1 $4,725 $7,980
Payback 4.6 Years
Based on these comparisons, staff recommends the purchase of the
bioMErieux Vitek Jr. Automated Bacterial Identification System, Specification No.
E-230, in the amount of $37,130.00, plus sales tax and freight.
10ld): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO, 21 TO CENTRAL POWER
GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1.
Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1,
designed by Brown and Caldwell, is part of the $66 million master-planned Central
Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at both
plants. This $16.6 million contract includes installation of three prepurchased
digester-gas burning, spark-ignited, 3472 horsepower engines with generators that
are each capable of producing 2500 kilowatts of electrical power. Change Order
No. 21 adds $192,366.00 and 67 calendar days to the contract for three items of
-5-
May 12, 1993
additional work, including costs for further delays resulting from deficient lube oil
filters provided by the engine manufacturer, Cooper Industries. The delay costs
have been previously reported to the Directors in conjunction with discussions
regarding the Central Power Generation System engine problems
Item 1, in an amount not to exceed $187,454.00, is for additional
contractor extended overhead costs for the period of January 19, 1993 through
June 18, 1993. These costs are associated with further delays in starting up the
owner-supplied equipment (engines) and revised start-up procedures as described in
previous Change Order No. 18, Item 1, approved by the Directors on February 10,
1993. As reported to the Boards, the start-up of the engines has most recently
been delayed by inadequate lube oil filters provided by the engine manufacturer,
Cooper. The negotiated cost for extended overhead declines as time goes on; full
payment may not be required. Approval now will allow monthly payments as
needed and a final accounting will be provided in a future change order. This item
includes a 67-calendar day extension of time for delays associated with this lube oil
filter element dispute. At this time, Cooper Industries continues to deny
responsibility for these deficiencies. Work to correct the engine and appurtenant
equipment was authorized to be initiated by the Boards on December 9, 1992 to
minimize costs due to delays. The Boards also directed the General Counsel to
seek remedies and cost recovery from Cooper for breach of contract. Final
resolution of this dispute with the engine manufacturer will be settled at a later
date.
L/
Item 2, in the amount of $3,221.00, is for adding telephone cables for
service to the elevator car, electric room, and control room not included in the
original contract. Telephone service to the elevator car is required by state codes
and must be completed prior to commissioning the elevator. Telephone service to
the control and electric rooms is required for Districts operational staff currently
occupying portions of the building.
Item 3, in the amount of $1,691.00, is for revising pressure relief valve
and pressure switch settings for the starting and instrument air receivers to
pressures less than the maximum allowable pressure stamped on the tanks as
required by ASME pressure vessel codes. The pressure relief valves were
recalibrated and certified off site and reinstalled.
Except for Items 1 and 3, the above described changes would have been
included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. Item 1
is the result of manufacturing problems. A portion of Item 3 involves rework. If
the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date
on this contract will be $1,447,454.00 with 335 calendar days time extension.
This represents an increase of 9.39% over the original contract. Of this amount,
-6-
May 12, 1993
2.77% represents the cost of correcting deficiencies in the gas-driven engines and
related equipment which were improperly manufactured and prepared for storage
by the engine manufacturer.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 21 for a net addition of
$192,366.00 and 67 calendar days to the contract with Hunter Corporation.
10le): APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRIORITY PROJECTS
ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT
PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-38-2.
Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-38,
and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43,
include over 100 relatively small miscellaneous improvements to various facilities
throughout both treatment plants. The proposed improvements will enhance
safety, process reliability and performance, and replace obsolete equipment and
systems.
These items have been split among five smaller projects, which have
been categorized as higher priority projects at each plant, lower priority projects at
each plant, and security and landscaping improvements at Plant No. 1 . This
project, Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No. 1, is the second in the series of five construction projects to be bid.
There are twenty-one items of work included in these construction
documents. The following summarizes the larger items of work to be undertaken:
- Demolition of the old City Water Pump Station.
- Prechlorination system modifications to convert system from manual
control to flow paced control.
- Modifications to improve operations and safety at the Chlorine
Building.
- Chemical storage tank containment areas to prevent contamination.
- Modifications to the primary treatment facilities to improve sludge
density control, scum removal and pumping, and to provide safer
access to the scum removal point at the circular basins.
- Replacement of all sewage diversion gates at the Metering and
Diversion Structure.
- Construction of two new scrubbers to operate in series with the
Headworks scrubbers to treat peak loads of hydrogen sulfide from
the influent trunks to reduce odors.
- Replacement of the paging system at both plants.
- Automatic transfer switch at the plant water pumps.
-7-
May 12, 1993
Piping modifications at grit chambers to alleviate plugging problems.
Staff has accelerated the bidding process to take advantage of the
excellent bidding climate.
Staff recommends the approval of the plans and specifications, and
authorization to receive bids on May 18, 1993 for Priority Projects Element of
Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2. The engineer's estimate is
$5,000,000.
101fj: RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND
APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR ADDITIONAL
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RE JOBS NOS. P1-38 AND
P2-43•
In June 1991, the Directors awarded a professional services agreement to
John Carollo Engineers for preparation of plans and specifications for design and
construction support services for miscellaneous facilities at both plants, to design
the replacement of equipment which is obsolete or has reached the end of its
useful life span, rehabilitation of facilities which are in need of repair, or
modification of process elements to improve plant-wide performance. Addendum
No. 1 revised the errors and omissions insurance requirements, and Addendum No.
2 increased the scope of work to include several small items which, because of
their small scale in relation to the large number of items in the miscellaneous
improvement projects, could best be included in this design contract thereby
benefiting from economies of scale.
Addendum No. 3 provides for additional engineering services to complete
the design for seismic retrofit of nonstructural items, and to incorporate smaller
scope changes, such as recessing two new scrubbers for aesthetics, using polymer
blending systems and controls as requested by our operations staff, and replacing
worn fans, pumps and tanks in areas related to items in the original scope of work.
The original scope of work required the consultant to provide the detailed
design for the seismic retrofit of nonstructural items at both treatment plants. The
nonstructural items include above-ground piping systems, a ducting system,
electrical raceways, electrical equipment, mechanical equipment, chemical storage
tanks, scrubbers, and bookshelves and storage racks in various buildings. This
detailed design is based on earlier studies by Dames & Moore Inc. which identified
the need for the work.
-8-
May 12, 1993
When the proposals were solicited for the project, the extent of the
seismic retrofit of nonstructural items was estimated to require 5,000 hours of
design work. All consultants that submitted proposals to perform the engineering
services were required by the Scope of Work to use this estimate in their
proposals. The exact effort was unknown at the time because a detailed field
investigation by qualified structural engineers to observe the existing conditions of
the seismic restraints on all nonstructural systems had to be made as part of the
project's early work to quantify the extent of the retrofit. The Districts' staff
engineers are not afforded the time to conduct this type of detailed investigation
due to their heavy project loads. Therefore, the RFP fixed the number of hours at
5,000 so that all the proposals would be comparable, with the provision that an
adjustment would be made once the full effort had been defined. The full
investigation, now completed, shows that a total of approximately 8,000 hours of
design work is required for the complete task, which equates to an additional
3,000 hours of design work.
As authorized by the Directors in February, the Selection Committee has
negotiated Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with John
Carollo Engineers for the additional professional services, based on hourly rates
plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, for the
additional contract amount of $527,600.00, as follows:
Proposed
Existing Proposed Amended
Aoreement Addn. No. 3 Aoreement
Engineering Services, direct
labor at hourly rates plus
overhead at 156%,
not to exceed $1,420,359.20 $439,800.00 $1,860,159.20
Construction Support Services
and 0&M Manual Preparation,
direct labor at hourly rates
plus overhead at 160%, not
to exceed 223,425.80 0.00 223,425.80
Direct Expenses, at cost,
not to exceed 76,690.00 35,000.00 111,690.00
Subconsultants, not to exceed 34,200.00 0.00 0.00
Fixed Profit 236,890.00 52,800.00 289,690.00
Total Amended Contract, not to exceed $1,991,565.00 3527.600.00 52.519.165.00
-9-
May 12, 1993
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above additional work,
and adoption of a resolution approving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional
Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Miscellaneous Improvements
to Facilities at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Jobs Nos. P1-38 and P2-43. Copies of the
certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents.
101g1: APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO DAMES & MOORE, INC. FOR SEISMIC
STUDY ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES
AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2. JOBS NOS. P7-38-3 AND P2-43-32.
In October 1990, the Boards awarded a Professional Services Agreement
to Dames and Moore to provide engineering services for the Seismic Study Element
of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Jobs Nos.
P7-38-3 and P2-43-2. This project was for the structural and geotechnical
investigation of Districts' facilities, focusing on older facilities originally designed
under less stringent criteria. Headworks B and C at Plant No. 2 were high on the
rehabilitation priority list, and in November 1991 the Directors authorized
Addendum No. 1 to the Dames and Moore contract for the design of a seismic
retrofit to these facilities. Addendum No. 2, approved in May 1992, provided for
reallocation of funds between categories at no increase in contract amount and
changed the firm's name to Dames & Moore, Inc.
Dames & Moore has requested that the contract amounts be adjusted
again to more closely reflect actual expenditures. Specifically, it is requested that
the amount for Subcontractors Fees be reduced by $27,000.00, Direct Expenses
be increased by $10,000.00, and Direct Labor be increased by $17,000.00.
Dames & Moore has made this request because they were able to complete most
of the work for B and C Headworks design with in-house staff on their recently
acquired CADD system, in lieu of using outside subcontractors. No additional work
has been added to the contract. There is no change in the maximum authorization
of $840,620.00, as follows:
-10-
May 12, 1993
Proposed
Existing Proposed Amended
Agreement Addn. No. 3 Agreement
Engineering Services, direct
labor at hourly rates plus
overhead at 180%,
not to exceed $627,540.00 $17,000.00 $644,540.00
Direct Expenses, at cost,
not to exceed 22,800.00 10,000.00 32,800.00
Subconsultants, not to exceed 120,000.00 (27,000.00) 93,000.00
Fixed Profit 70 280.00 0.00 70,280.00
Total Contract, not to exceed 5840.620.00 S 0 00 5840.620.00
The action appearing on the agenda is to adopt a resolution approving
Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with Dames & Moore,
Inc. for design of Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to
Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of
Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2. A copy
of the resolution is attached with the supporting agenda documents.
10(h): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND
APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH LEE & RO
CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY
UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-40-2. AND FACILITY
MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO, 2. JOB NO,
P2-47-2•
Through the routine activities of design, construction, operations and
maintenance of our 294 million gallon per day capacity sewage treatment plants,
small jobs are continually identified by staff which require evaluation and possible
upgrading or modification. These small projects, which require more time than
available for Districts' staff to evaluate and design in-house because of limited staff
resources, are assembled into larger projects for ease of project management when
using outside consulting services. A number of these small jobs have been
assembled for the subject projects, Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at
Plant No. 1, Job No. 127-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2.
v
_11_
May 12, 1993
Staff has prepared a scope of work outlining the recommended
improvements to facilities at both the Huntington Beach Treatment Plant and
Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. The work will improve aspects of our activities
pertaining to safety, operations, maintenance, aesthetics and odor control. There
are a total of sixty-two separate items of work between the two facilities.
Fourteen tasks will provide safer work environments, thirty-three tasks will improve
operations and plant efficiency, one task will be completed to meet South Coast Air
Quality Management District permit requirements, nine tasks will improve odor
control, three tasks will improve plant aesthetics, and two tasks will improve
facilities and equipment access for operations and maintenance work.
The tasks are an accumulation of relatively minor modifications or
restorations deemed necessary by operations, maintenance, safety and engineering
staffs. All of the work is on existing process equipment, and will require extensive
coordination to accommodate ongoing plant operations during construction. The
estimated total project cost is $3.5 million.
In February, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit
proposals for a professional services agreement for the above described work.
Proposals were received from three firms. The Selection Committee has negotiated
a professional services agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers to prepare
the design report, plans and specifications, and provide construction support
services, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants
fees, and fixed profit, for an amount not to exceed $549,000.00.
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work, and
adoption of a resolution approving a Professional Services Agreement with Lee &
Ro Consulting Engineers. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached
with the supporting agenda documents.
101i): AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM
NO. 2 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH BROWN AND
CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS RE MASTER-PLANNED SUPPORT
FACILITIES AT PLANTS 1 AND 2. JOBS NOS. J-11-1. J-26, J-27,
P2-23-5-1. P2-35-2. P2-35-3. P2-35-4 AND P2-35-5.
In May 1989, the Boards awarded a professional services agreement to
Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers to provide engineering services for the
design of eight separate master-planned support facilities for Plants 1 and 2. The
Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2 , Job No. P2-23-5-1(Rebid No. 2) is
now under construction with completion expected a year from now.
-12-
May 12, 1993
In May 1991, Addendum No. 1 was approved by the Boards providing for
extra costs because of delays in finalizing the projects. Several of the projects
have been delayed and changed in the interim. For example, the 1992 Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) passed by Congress in July required changes to the
plans and specifications, including adding an elevator and other exit requirements.
Other changes include relocating proposed buildings, and providing additional
power supply requirements. Also, an alternate city water supply may be required.
Additional changes will significantly reduce the original scope of work. Other work
has been delayed due to budgetary constraints. The Operations Center Expansion,
which was bid three times, was finally awarded in February 1993. Therefore,
certain scope changes, and possible contract adjustments, may be appropriate.
Accordingly, staff is recommending that the Selection Committee solicit a
proposal and negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement
with Brown and Caldwell Consulting Engineers for additions and deletions to the
scope of work, and costs for delays re master-planned support facilities at Plants 1
and 2: Jobs Nos. J-11-1, J-26, J-27, P2-23-5-1, P2-35-2, P2-35-3, P2-35-4 and
122-35-5. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed
addendum will be presented to the Boards for consideration.
10(j): AUTHORIZE THE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND
NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND
GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, SPECIFICATION NO. 5-070, FOR
COLLECTION SYSTEM AND TREATMENT PLANT PROJECTS.
Environmental and geotechnical services for the Districts' design and
construction projects have traditionally been provided by consultants acting as
subconsultants to the Districts' consulting design engineers. Soils explorations are
usually performed during the design phase of a project, with professional services
contracts administered by the Districts' staff.
Specialized environmental and geotechnical services are required for
many projects, including liquefaction potential of the soils at Plants 1 and 2, and
other issues which require environmental and seismic expertise from speciality
consultants. The problem of liquefaction potential requires design and testing of
various alternatives for the design of each project. In addition, during excavation
for trunk sewers contaminated soil from leaking underground tanks is often
encountered requiring risk assessment and/or soils testing as well as advice on how
to best resolve the problem.
Because of the volume of collection system and treatment plant work,
and the need to be able to resolve environmental or seismic problems with
minimum project delays, staff is recommending that the Selection Committee be
-13-
May 12, 1993
authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate an agreement to provide environmental
and geotechnical services on an as-needed basis. This work would be done by a
consultant(s) under contract with the Districts, rather than as a subcontractor to
our designers. There should be no increase in cost, only a shift in contract
administration from the design consultant to the Districts' staff.
Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed
agreement will be presented to the Boards for consideration.
DISTRICTS 1 AND 2
10(k): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO MEMORY LANE
INTERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 2-30.
This $3.5 million project within the Cities of Orange and Santa Ana
includes the construction of a new 2.2-mile gravity sewer line and appurtenances
in Memory Lane from the Santa Ana River to the Santa Ana Freeway, in Owens
Drive from the Santa Ana Freeway to Parker Street, in Parker Street from Owens
Drive to La Vets Avenue and in Parker Street to Batavia Street. Portions are being
constructed using boring techniques where open excavations were prohibited, such
as crossing the Santa Ana Freeway. Funding is being shared with the City of
Santa Ana at $1.3 million, the City of Orange at $700,000.00, with Districts 1 and
2 sharing the remaining $1.5 million. Change Order No.t adds $78,273.22 to the
contract for five items of additional work.
Item 1, in the amount of $12,939.06, is for additional work and delays
caused by undisclosed underground utilities encountered during excavation and
pipe laying operations, including sewer, water and gas lines in Memory Lane, City
of Santa Ana; and water and gas lines in Parker Street, City of Orange.
Item 2, a credit in the amount of $25,000.00, is for the substitution of
30-inch diameter, Class 52 ductile iron polyethylene-lined and polyvinyl-wrapped
pipe for the specified 30-inch diameter vitrified clay pipe.
Item 3, in the amount of $32,905.16, is for undisclosed rock conditions
that were found during the excavation for the sewer line in Parker Street, north of
Town and Country Road. Item 4, in the amount of $10,302.00, is for extra work
involved when a broken water main flooded the trench in Memory Lane in Santa
Ana. Item 5, in the amount of $47,127.00, is for extending the jacked casing on
both sides of the freeway right-of-way, required by CALTRANS field engineer, and
because of an undisclosed concrete thrust block for a 16-inch water line.
CALTRANS ordered the majority of the extension, well beyond that required on the
CALTRANS permit at the time of the construction.
-14-
May 12, 1993
The above-described changes would have been included in the original
design if discovered or known in the design phase. There is no replacement work.
If the Directors approve this change order, the total of the change orders to date on
this contract will be $78,273.22 with no calendar days time extension. This
represents an increase of 2.3% over the original contract amount.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for a net addition of
$78,273.22 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction Company, Inc.
There is no time extension associated with this change order.
DISTRICT 2
100): APPROVE EXCHANGE OF OWNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 AND CITY OF PLACENTIA RE PALM
AVENUE PURCHASE. CONTRACT NO. 2-33.
The Palm Avenue Purchase sewer, built in 1962, was purchased by
County Sanitation District No. 2 (CSD 2) in 1964 from the Yorba Linda Water
District for $32,000. The 15-inch Palm Avenue Purchase sewer runs 2,850 feet
from Kraemer Boulevard to Valencia Avenue and flows to the Yorba Linda Pump
Station. The Carbon Canyon-Palm Drive Interceptor, Contract No. 2-17-2, is a
4,135-foot, 39-inch sewer constructed in 1974, parallel to the Palm Avenue
Purchase sewer, to serve new development. The Palm Avenue Purchase sewer no
v longer has a major value to the District as a trunk sewer and can be abandoned.
However, it does have value to the City of Placentia as a local collector, and the
City of Placentia has requested that the District transfer ownership of the Palm
Avenue Purchase to the City. Transfer of the sewer would relieve the Districts of
the costs of abandonment and all maintenance and repair responsibilities.
An exchange of ownership agreement has therefore been prepared to
transfer ownership of the Palm Avenue Purchase sewer from CSD 2 to Placentia.
General Counsel has approved the agreement in form. The action appearing on the
agenda is to approve the exchange of ownership Agreement between CSD 2 and
the City of Placentia. Staff recommends approval.
v
-15-
May 12, 1993
DISTRICT 5
10(m): APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS TO BAYSIDE
DRIVE TRUNK SEWER. PHASE 3. CONTRACT NO, 5-34-3 AS
COMPLETE, AND EXECUTION OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION AND
APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT.
This $4.8 million project within the City of Newport Beach includes the
construction of a new sewer line in Pacific Coast Highway through Corona del Mar.
Portions were constructed using tunneling techniques where excavations are deep.
Included in this contract is the repair of several sewer laterals installed by the City
of Newport Beach to the Sanitation District's old sewer line, thereby allowing
abandonment of the old line, as well as a new median in Pacific Coast Highway,
southerly of Hazel Drive. This contract is now complete.
Silveri and LeBouef have fulfilled all contractual obligations within the
specified and extended time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the
resolution attached with the agenda material, authorizing acceptance of the work
as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of
Completion as required. The final project cost is $4,757,710.00.
DISTRICT 7
10(n): APPROVAL FOR CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE
ABANDONMENT OF RED HILL PUMP STATION. PHASE 1 . CONTRACT
NO, 7-14-1-1. AS COMPLETE.
This Phase 1 project, within the City of Tustin and unincorporated County
territory, includes the construction of a gravity sewer pipe in easements from
Pavilion Drive to Lambert Street. The project will allow flows tributary to the Red
Hill Pump Station to be directed to the Irvine Ranch Water District's (IRWD)
Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer (HATS). In the near future, this project will be
followed by the Phase 2 project which is the actual abandonment of the Red Hill
Pump Station. That work must await completion of certain other sewers by IRWD.
The contract is now complete.
(1) Chance Order No. 1
Change Order No. 1 grants a 33-calendar day time extension to the
contract for inclement weather.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for the addition
of 33 calendar days to the contract.
-16-
May 12, 1993
(2) Acceptance of Contract as Complete
Silveri and LeBouef JV have fulfilled all contractual obligations
within the allotted and extended time. Staff therefore recommends
adoption of the resolution attached with the supporting agenda
documents, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete,
execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice
of Completion as required. The final project cost is $90,732.00.
10(0): APPROVING EXCHANGE OF SEWER LINE EASEMENTS BETWEEN
DISTRICT 7 AND CROW WINTHROP AT MICHELSON PUMP STATION.
CONTRACT NO, 7-11-2.
Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2, has been recently
upgraded and relocated to a new site within the Park Place Development located
between Michelson Avenue and the San Diego Freeway east of Jamboree
Boulevard in the City of Irvine. Over the northeasterly corner of the District's fee-
owned pump station site parcel, dedicated by Crow Winthrop, Crow is requesting a
ten-foot wide easement required for a new sewer line to be owned by Crow.
Concurrently, an older sewer will be abandoned, and Crow is quitclaiming a ten-
foot easement to the Districts. There is no monetary exchange involved.
The recommended action is to adopt a resolution authorizing the General Manager
to execute the Grant of Easement to Crow Winthrop Development in a form
approved by General Counsel. The General Manager has authority to accept the
Quitclaim.
10(p): RECEIVE AND FILE SUMMONS FROM LOYD T. NITZEN. Il, RE VEHICLE
ACCIDENT AND AUTHORIZE GENERAL COUNSEL TO TAKE
APPROPRIATE ACTIONS.
The District was recently served with a Summons and Complaint for
Order Relieving Petitioner from provisions of Government Code, Section 945.4,
with regard to the request to file late claim that was denied by the District re Loyd
T. Nitzen, ll, vs Orange County Sanitation District, Case No. 708855 (Claim No. 7-
CSD-93-L-1), for alleged personal injuries and property damage in connection with
a vehicle accident in the City of Tustin where routine sewer maintenance was
being performed by District crews.
The General Counsel stated that this claim is an automobile accident
which did not Involve District vehicles. A line-cleaning crew was operating in the
Tustin vicinity, with the manhole area where they were working coned off and
protected in accordance with standard traffic control and safety measures. The
-17-
May 12, 1993
claimant was southbound and turned left in front of and around the District's
vehicle which was parked and coned, and turned in front of oncoming traffic,
thereby causing a collision.
The routine action appearing on the agenda is to receive and file
Summons and Complaint and authorize the District's General Counsel to appear
and defend the interests of the District.
DISTRICT 11
10(g): AUTHORIZE EXTENSION OF LEASE AGREEMENT WITH GTE FOR RIGHT-
OF-WAY LEASE AND RENTAL PAYMENTS FOR EMERGENCY
GENERATOR AT SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION.
In 1988, the District obtained a lease from GTE for a small parcel
adjacent to the Slater Avenue Pump Station for placement of a trailer containing an
emergency generator. This is a critical pump station and the generator is on-site to
avoid a sewage spill in the event of a power outage.
It was expected that the new Slater Avenue Pump Station, which will
have a built-in emergency generator, would be completed within the five-year term
of the lease, however, the project has been delayed for various reasons.
Staff therefore recommends that the Directors authorize an extension of
the term of the lease for an additional three years to February 1, 1996, at the same
rate, $1,900 per year. The new pump station will be constructed and operational
by the end of the three-year period. The action appearing on the agenda is to
adopt a resolution amending the original authorization and approving a three-year
extension of the lease.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
ALL DISTRICTS
12: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF FISCAL POLICY/EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEES.
The Fiscal Policy Committee met on April 21, 1993, and the Executive
Committee met on April 28, 1993. Enclosed for the Directors are written reports
on their deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards.
_18_
May 12, 1993
13: REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE.
The Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee met on April 27, 1993.
Enclosed for the Directors is a written report of its meeting.
14: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION.
From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed
session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending
litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public
disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation
where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing
item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the
regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards.
DISTRICTS 5 AND 6
28: APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REPLACEMENT OF
PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER. BETWEEN THE ARCHES
(NEWPORT BOULEVARD) AND DOVER DRIVE, CONTRACT NO. 5-37-4.
In July 1992, the Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement
with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway
...� Gravity Sewer, between Bitter Point Pump Station and Dover Drive,
Contracts 5-37-3 and 5-37-4. The 1989 Master Plan had found that the existing
sewer is hydraulically inadequate to meet long-term flow projections. The sewer,
built in 1936, is also failing and its replacement and/or rehabilitation for structural
reasons is more urgent now then for future hydraulic needs. CALTRANS is
planning to reconstruct and resurface Coast Highway between Newport Boulevard
and Dover Drive in Newport Beach between February and June 1994. Therefore,
this project has been accelerated to be completed prior to the start of the
CALTRANS work.
Plans and specifications are complete for Contract No. 5-37-4, the reach
between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive. The CALTRANS work
is being coordinated with the Districts' project, the needs of the adjacent business
and residential communities, and with the needs identified by the City of Newport
Beach. The sewer line work between Newport Boulevard and Dover Drive is
scheduled to begin construction in September 1993 with completion by January
1994.
-19-
May 12, 1993
There have been several public meetings between the Districts'
engineering staff and the Mariners Mile Business Association, as well as the
adjacent business and residential communities. As a result, a portion of the sewer
replacement will include rehabilitation by either the Insituform method or by
insertion of a high density polyethylene pipe Into the existing pipe (approximately
3,200 feet of 24-inch pipe). The balance of the project will involve replacement of
approximately 3,100 feet of 30-Inch pipe and reconstruction of all manholes.
As part of Contract No. 5-37-4, the Districts will identify utilities that will
have a critical bearing on the selected alignment for future Contract No. 5-37-3,
between the Arches and Bitter Point Pump Station, tentatively scheduled for fall
1994. The specifications provide for a bonus of $500 per day for early job
completion plus a $1,000 per day bonus for early completion of the rehabilitation
work. Late completion will result in identical liquidated damage assessments.
Westerly of the Arches, Pacific Coast Highway has already been
reconstructed by CALTRANS. Alignment studies are still being conducted by the
Districts' consultant to determine the optimal alignment for this reach to minimize
disruptions to a newly reconstructed Pacific Coast Highway. This reach will
involve full replacement with larger carrier pipes to meet future hydraulic capacity
requirements. The design of this reach will be completed by year-end with
construction starting after Contract No. 5-37-4 is completed.
Staff recommends approval of the plans and specifications and
authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Contract
No. 5-37-4. The bid date is tentatively set for June 8, 1993. The engineer's
estimate is $1.8 million.
DISTRICT 5
31: APPROVAL OF ADDENDA NOS.1 AND 2 AND AWARD CRYSTAL COVE
PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO. 5-36.
In March, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract
No. 5-36, the new Crystal Cove Pump Station, which will serve the down coast
developing areas adjacent to Crystal Cove. This pump station is an essential
element within the new South Coast Trunk Sewer System, Phase 2, which was
recently awarded to Mike Prlich & Sons under Contract No. 5-35-2. The Crystal
Cove Pump Station will receive flow from the upstream gravity sewer system and
discharge flow into the new double-barrel force main system being built under
Contract No. 5-35-2.
-20-
May 12, 1993
(1) Addendum No. 1
Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications makes
modifications to the plans to include the revised location of new
drainage ditches installed by the County of Orange which are
interfering with the new pump station driveway location.
(2) Addendum No. 2
Addendum No. 2 makes several modifications and technical
clarifications to the plans, specifications, permits and appendix,
clarifying CALTRANS permit conditions, electrical standards, and
structural details in response to questions raised during the bidding
phase.
(3) Award of Contract
On April 13, 1993, 13 bids were received for said contract. The
bids ranged from a high of $1,331,633.00 to a low of
$993,442.00, submitted by Schuler Engineering Corporation. A
complete bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda
material.
Staff recommends approval of Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 and award to
Schuler Engineering Corporation in their low bid amount of $933,442.00. The
engineer's estimate was $1.0 million.
DISTRICT 3
34: REQUEST TO CONSIDER MODIFIED SEWER CONNECTION FEES FOR
LOW INCOME/SENIOR CITIZEN PROJECTS.
At the April 14th meeting, District 3 Directors received a request to
reduce sewer connection fees from Jan Development Co., and Chairman Sal Sapien
for the Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton. After
considerable discussion, because sewer connection fees are administered in
accordance with a uniform policy adopted by all Districts and any modifications
could have Districts'-wide implications, the matter was referred to the Fiscal Policy
Committee.
The Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee reviewed the
issue at length and, for the reasons set forth in the enclosed reports of their
meetings dated April 22, 1993 and April 28, 1993, respectively, have
-21-
May 12, 1993
recommended that no further study be given to the Issue of modifying sewer
connection fees and that no change be made to the existing policy that does not
allow for any fee adjustments. (See Agenda Item No. 02)(b)(5).)
Chairman Sapien has requested that the matter be placed on the May 12,
1993 agenda for separate consideration by District No. 3 Directors. He has also
directed staff and the General Counsel to draft an ordinance for introduction in the
event the Directors give favorable consideration to the request. The agenda lists
discussion of the issue and alternative actions for consideration.
J. ay a ylvester
G er er JWS:jt
_22_
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
1C6iC ELLI9 AVENUE
PO 90%9127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAUEOFNA 9212"127
April 28, 1993 17141M2-2411
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: Aoril 28. 1993 - 5:30 o.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General
Evelyn Hart Vice Joint Chairman Counsel
Buck Catlin Past Joint Chairman Director Frank Lazio
Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman
Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 STAFF:
John C. Cox, Jr. Chairman, District 5
James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Charles E. Puckett Chairman, District 7 Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering
Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Blake Anderson, Director of
Roger R. Stanton County Supervisor Technical Services
William Steiner County Supervisor Gary Hasenstab, Director of
Personnel
Absent: Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of
Maintenance
Robert Richardson Chairman, District 1 Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of
Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 2 Operations
John Gullixson Chairman, District 13 Steve Hovey, Manager of
Barry Hammond Director Information Services
1) Report and Recommendations of the Fiscal Policy Committee.
Fiscal Policy Committee Chairman Puckett reported that the Committee
met on April 21st and considered several items of business. Enclosed
is a copy of the Committee's report on their deliberations. The following
summarizes the recommended action items:
April 28, 1993
A. Selection of Firms to Provide Bond Counsel and Underwriter's
Counsel Services.
The Joint Boards have previously directed the General Counsel to
submit a list of firms for consideration by the Directors for
providing bond counsel services for upcoming transactions. The
Fiscal Policy Committee considered the qualifications of several
firms as summarized in the General Counsel' s memorandum of
April 7, 1993, and recommended that Orrick, Herrington and
Sutcliffe be selected as bond counsel, Rourke, Woodruff &
Spradlin as co-counsel; and that Merrill Lynch, the Districts'
underwriter, be requested to utilize Brown and Wood or Jones,
Hall, Hill and White as underwriter's counsel.
Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive
Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's
recommendations, as follows:
(1) That Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe be selected to serve
as special bond counsel on the Advance Refunding
Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, and the Fixed-
to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP, (1993 SWAP), and that a
fee proposal be requested for consideration by the Directors
at a future meeting.
(2) That Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin be selected to serve as
co-counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of
Participation 1993 Series 1, and the Fixed-to-Floating
Interest Rate SWAP, (1993 SWAP), and that a fee proposal
be requested for consideration by the Directors at a future
meeting.
(3) That Merrill Lynch, the Districts' underwriter, be requested
to utilize the firm of Brown and Wood or the firm of Jones,
Hall, Hill and White to serve as underwriter's counsel on the
Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993
Series. (The Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP (1993
SWAP) does not require underwriter's counsel, since it is
not a public offering.)
-2-
April 28, 1993
It was noted that if the underwriter submits a compelling
reason to use a different, qualified firm as counsel, the
Directors would consider such a request.
Director Stanton requested that his abstention from voting
on this item be made a matter of record.
B. Owner-Controlled Wrap -Up Insurance Program.
The Fiscal Policy Committee is considering an owner controlled
wrap-up insurance program for the Districts which would
incorporate contractors' workers' compensation, general liability,
excess liability, excess automobile and project errors and
omissions insurance for all construction projects into a centralized
and coordinated insurance and loss prevention program. Based on
the Districts' master-planned construction program over the next
three years it is estimated that the Districts could realize
approximately $2,528,000 in project insurance cost savings over
that period. The Committee is still developing the details of such
a program and whether or not it should be implemented by the
Districts.
Before a wrap-up program could be implemented it would require
approval of the State Legislature. There is currently a bill being
drafted which requests authorization for two other POTWs in
addition to two other public entities. Accordingly, it may be
advantageous for the Districts to piggy-back on to this proposed
bill rather than "go it alone." The Committee therefore
recommended that the necessary legislative authorization be
sought and that the proposed program be drafted in more detail.
Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive
Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's
recommendations, as follow:
0) That staff and general counsel be authorized and directed
to take steps necessary to seek approval by the State
Legislature of an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance
Program for Districts' construction projects,
-3-
April 28, 1993
(2) That staff and Robert F. Driver Associates, the Districts'
insurance consultant/broker, be authorized and directed to
return to the Fiscal Policy Committee with further
information on an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance
Program for Districts' construction projects, a draft of such
a plan and an implementation schedule for consideration by
the Districts.
C. 1993-94 Sewer Use and Connection Fee Recommendations•
The Districts are fortunate in that they are able to increase sewer
use and connection fees to offset the rising costs of providing
sewerage service brought about by stricter regulatory
requirements, new development and growth within our service
area, and inflation. Unfortunately, it is more difficult for our
member agencies to replace revenues or finance added costs
shifted by the state and the staff is extremely sensitive to that.
Accordingly, for the second year in a row, the General Manager
has directed staff to prepare a "hold-the-line budget" (actually the
1992-93 budgets were reduced and are expected to be reduced
again in 1993-94) and is recommending that sewer use and
connection fees=be increased in 1993-94. These are the same
rates originally adopted for 1991-92 and 1992-93, except that
user fees for 1992-93 were ultimately increased to offset the
confiscation of property taxes by the State in September 1992.
If the state confiscates the Districts' remaining property taxes in
1993-94, as they have declared their intent to do, then the only
real alternative deemed viable by the Boards last year is to
increase user fees to make up for that loss in property taxes. To
do otherwise would seriously jeopardize the Districts' operational
and fiscal integrity and excellent standing in the financial
community and, in fact, most likely end up costing our ratepayers
substantially more in the long-run for increased interest and other
costs. If the State confiscates the Districts' remaining $30.7
million in property taxes, it would require a $35.67 increase in the
average single-family annual sewer use fee, from $71.28 to
$106.55, or 50%.
_4-
April 28, 1993
The Fiscal Policy Committee concurs with the staff's
recommendation to hold sewer use and connection fees at the
current rates.
Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive
Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's
recommendation that the Boards declare that the current 1992-93
sewer use fees and connection fees will not be increased next
year and will continue at the same rates for 1993-94, provided
the Governor and State Legislature do not confiscate Districts'
property taxes, as follows:
ANNUAL SEWER USE FEES - 1993-94
District Single-Family Multi-Family Non-Residential
No. Residential Residential Properties
1 $ 83.24 $49.94/Unit $59.52/1,000 SF
2 71 .52 42.91/Unit 51.14/1,000 SF
3 73.89 44.33/Unit 52.83/1,000 SF
5 96.75 58.05/Unit 69.18/1,000 SF
6 76.47 45.88/Unit 54.68/1,000 SF
7 50.09 30.05/Unit 35.81/1 ,000 SF
11 60.00 36.00/Unit 42.90/1,000 SF
13 100.00 60.00/Unit 71 .50/1,000 SF
14 NONE - District No. 14 is fully funded by IRWD
CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION FEES - 1993-94
DISTRICTS NOS. 1 . 2. 3. 4. 6, 7. 11 & 13
RESIDENTIAL: $2,350/DWELLING UNIT
NON-RESIDENTIAL: $470/1,000 SQUARE FEET, $2,350
MINIMUM
DISTRICT NO. 14
NONE - District No. 14 is fully funded by IRWD.
-5-
April 28, 1993 '
D. Adjustment of Source Control Administrative Fees. Non-
Compliance Semolina Fees and Miscellaneous Charges and Fees.
Sewer use and connection fees, the major source of fee revenue
for the Districts, are established by ordinance adopted by the
Boards. Separate and apart from these fees is an ordinance that
establishes miscellaneous fees and charges for administering the
Districts' Source Control Program. These include fees for
wastewater discharge permits, treatment and disposal of trucked
wastes, fees for the collection and processing of water
consumption and tax data, and fees for sampling non-compliant
dischargers.
Staff has reviewed these fees that are intended to recover certain
costs of administering the Source Control Program and determined
that they are not recovering the current costs due to new
requirements and program changes, and a recommendation to
recover heretofore unrecovered capital costs for out-of-district
waste-haulers.
The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends that the fee ordinance
for Miscellaneous Source Control Program costs be amended to
establish the fees in an amount required to recover current costs.
Executive Committee Recommendation: The Fiscal Executive
Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee and
recommends that staff and General Counsel be directed to draft
an amendment to the Districts' Ordinance Establishing Source
Control Fees,Administrative Fees,Non-Compliance Sampling Fees
and Miscellaneous Charges for introduction and first reading at the
regular June meeting of the Boards of Directors, to adjust or
establish said fees in the amounts determined necessary to
recover the Districts' costs. (Said fees are shown on Tables I and
II of the enclosed Staff Report.)
E. aor est to Consider Modified Sewer Connection Fees for Low
Income/Senior Citizen Projects.
At the April 14th meeting, the District No. 3 Directors considered
-6-
` April 28, 1993
a request from District 3 Chairman Sal Sapien for reduced
connection fees for the Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen
Apartments in the City of Stanton. After a lengthy discussion
regarding the equitability of connection fees, and the need for
lower priced housing, the matter was deemed a Districts' policy
issue and referred to the Fiscal Policy Committee for further
consideration.
The Fiscal Policy Committee discussed the issue at considerable
length and concluded the following:
• The purpose of the connection fee is that those placing a
demand on the system should pay for it.
• There is not necessarily a relationship between the size of
a dwelling and its occupancy and, therefore, the demand
placed on the sewerage system.
• Lowering connection fees for one user shifts the cost of
capital facilities to other users. Reducing connection fees
for one project would result in higher fees for other projects
or higher debt issues, thereby raising annual charges which
service debt and are paid by everyone.
• In the future, as additional senior facilities are constructed
in response to this area's and the country's aging
population, the shift would worsen, the day of reckoning
would simply be delayed and new or increased taxes/user
fees would ultimately be required.
• A reduction in connection fees would not produce a
significant change in the development's project costs. For
instance, for the Park Stanton project, a $500 reduction in
connection fees would save $167,500, or 0.7% of the
project's estimated total cost of $23,000,000.
• Other similar projects that paid the full connection fee have
been built in many cities, and it would be discriminatory to
now reduce fees for such new projects. To date, no
requested fee adjustments have been approved.
-7-
April 28, 1993
• Members were concerned about a general policy which may
lead to much higher administrative costs; for instance, each
project would have to be monitored by staff. Some low
income projects revert after a number of years to a different
status which may not include low income provisions.
Members were concerned that the administrative costs may
be excessive to monitor such a program.
For the above reasons,the Fiscal Policy Committee recommended
that no further study be given to the issue of modifying sewer
connection fees and that no change be made to the existing
policy.
The Executive Committee entered into a lengthy discussion of the
issues pertaining to granting fee reductions for low income/senior
citizen housing projects. District 3 Chairman Sapien, questioned
why the matter had been referred to the Fiscal Policy Committee.
He observed that the original request for a reduction of the sewer
connection fee for the Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen
Apartments in the City of Stanton had been submitted to District
3 which had not yet had a chance to consider it because it had
been sent to the Committee. He further observed his request was
not a request for a permanent policy change and urged that it
simply be referred back to District 3 to consider if it wishes to
grant the request.
Joint Chairman Mahoney, stated that it was the Boards practice
to refer Issues for Joint Districts review if they potentially have
Districts'-wide implications. Because the connection fee policy is
a uniform policy adopted by all Districts, and because if variances
are granted to one property it would shift portions of the capital
financing obligation to all other properties, it was deemed
appropriate for the Fiscal Policy Committee, on which all Districts
are represented,to review the matter from a Districts'-wide policy
perspective.
Supervisor Stanton commented on various types of low income
and senior citizen projects and observed that the Boards,
individually or jointly, could grant such requests for fee
adjustments and not necessarily set a broad precedent for other
-8-
April 28, 1993
projects. He urged that the Directors follow a policy that would
allow the flexibility of considering, on a case-by-case basis, and
granting, if warranted, requests for financial relief in the form of
connection fee reductions for worthwhile projects.
In response to a request from Director Swan regarding the legality
of selective fee reductions, the General Counsel reported that
Federal and State facilities construction grant regulations, which
the Districts are subject to, provide that all users of a sewerage
system be required to pay their proportionate share of the costs
of said system and that it could potentially be held that selective
reductions of fees may violate that requirement and jeopardize the
Districts' grant monies.
Although it was the consensus of the Executive Committee to
support the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation that no
further study be given to this issue of modifying sewer connection
fees and that no change be made to the existing policy, it was
also pointed out that the Chairman or a Board Member of District
3 could request that the issue of connection fee adjustments for
low income/senior citizen projects, or the specific request to
reduce the connection fee for the Park Stanton Place Senior
Citizen Apartments, be agendized for the May regular Board
Meeting for District 3. District 3 Chairman Sapien and some other
District 3 Directors indicated their desire to do so.
Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive
Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's
recommendation that no further study be given to the issue of
modifying sewer connection fees and that no change made to the
existing policy that does not allow fee adjustments.
Directors Lazio, Sapien and Stanton requested that their votes in
opposition to the recommendation be made a matter of record.
F. 1993 Summer Work Program Summary,
For several years, the Boards have authorized a summer work
program which allows us to complete backlogged routine painting,
-9-
April 28, 1993
`/
groundskeepingand general cleanup work which can best be done
in the warm summer months when temporary help (mostly
students) is available. Staff is recommending continuation of the
summer work program for 1993. The estimated cost is $225,000
for materials, supplies and wages for 38 part-time helpers from
May 24, 1993, through September 24, 1993. Our Maintenance
Department has determined that the summer work program saves
approximately $150,000 annually from what it would cost to
perform the equivalent amount of work with full-time, permanent
'staff.
The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends approval of the program
for 1993.
Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive
Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's
recommendation that the summer work program for 1993 be
authorized.
G. Uraina Eauitable Allocation of Prooertv Taxes and State Su000rt
for School Fundina in all California Counties Before Consideration
of Further Property Tax Shifts,
Director Swan reported that he was active in a coalition of public
agencies and private Interests that is working on strategies
pertaining to the State's proposal to further shift property taxes
from counties, cities and special districts to schools, and is urging
the State to first correct a situation that has resulted in an unfair
and inequitable allocation of property taxes for school funding that
currently exists in Orange County and some others because of
Proposition 13 and the Serrano Priest decision Isee blue-colored
summary enclosed with Fiscal Policy Committee Report). Because
of this Orange County's schools currently receive approximately
$50 million less in taxes and State school funding support than
the State-wide average.
Director Swan underscoredthe unfairness and inequity in this and
urged that the Directors take a position that before any further
property tax shifts from counties, cities and special districts to
-10.
April 28, 1993
schools are considered, equitable allocation of school property
taxes and State school funding support be achieved in all
California counties.
Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive
Committee recommends that the Boards of Directors adopt a
resolution urging that no further shift of property taxes from
counties, cities and special districts to fund schools be considered
until the following goals have been met:
That no county in California be asked to contribute any
additional amount of its 1 % ad valorem property tax to
fund K-14 education until all counties in the state match
that county's level of contribution of the 1 % ad valorem
property tax; and,
That all publicly-funded school systems in each county
contributing at least 40% of its property tax to education
will, at a minimum, receive the State Average Daily
Attendance funding per student.
The staff was directed to draft a resolution and place it on the
agenda for the regular May meeting of the Joint Boards for
consideration by the Directors.
2) Districts' Two-Way Radio System/County-Wide 800 MHz Radio System.
At the March 10th Joint Board meeting, following a discussion of the Districts'
two-way radio system, vis-a-vis the county-wide 800 MHz system, the
Directors deferred consideration of the proposed Purchase of Two-Way Radio
Equipment (Specification No. E-227) pending a staff review and report on the
appropriateness of the Districts' participating in the county-wide 800 MHz
system.
Staff reviewed the enclosed separate report (white). Because of the many
unknowns, at this stage, pertaining to the new county-wide 800 MHz system
implementation and their affect on the potentially significant impacts on the
Districts' two-way radio communication needs, staff has concluded that there
_11_
April 28, 1993
is insufficient information to enable a knowledgeable determination on
participation in the new 800 MHz system at this time. Staff, therefore,
recommended that the Districts continue to monitor the development of the
County-wide 800 MHz System until more information is available and then
report back to the Directors; and that, in the interim, the Districts should
maintain the existing 453 MHz System to meet current needs.
Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs
with the staff and recommends the following actions:
(1) Continue to monitor the progress and development of the proposed new
County-Wide 800 MHz Radio System and upon receipt of additional
information assess the advisability of the Districts' participation in the
system and report back to the Boards; and, in the interim, continue to
maintain the Districts' existing 453 MHz Two-Way Radio System in a
state of readiness and repair to meet the Districts' day-to-day and
emergency radio communications needs.
(2) Approve Purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment (Specification No. E-
227) from Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc., in the amount
of $38,383.00, plus sales tax, for new and replacement equipment for `r
the existing system. (This is the action that was deferred by the Boards
at the regular March 10, 1993 meeting pending a report on the 800 MHz
system.)
3) Status Reoort Re Central Power Generation System Proiects.
Staff provided the Committee with a verbal status report on progress towards
completion of the Central Power Generation System projects at Plants Nos. 1
and 2.
JWS:eyr
Enclosures
wpdoc\9mku c93%063893.ecm
-12-
�I
CouNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
April 22, 1993
Revised n ORANGE C0U1RY. CAgFONNIA
,pBY EW6.YfNIIE
aO wx am
fO11MNN VY1EY.Cplleamlla 92]28B12)
`� p141 Yn22.11
REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: April 21 . 1993
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
James V. Evans Ralph Hurst, Robert F. Driver Associates
Don Griffin Don McLean, Robert F. Driver Associates
John Gullixson
Iry Pickler STAFF PRESENT
James Wahner
Grace Winchell J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Evelyn Hart Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
Peer Swan Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering
Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel
ABSENT: Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of
Maintenance
None. Robert J. Ooten, Assistant Director of
Operations
\� Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager
Margie Nellor, Source Control Manager
Jim Wybenga, Principal Environmental
Specialist
1 . 1990-92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND INTEREST RATE
MONITORING.
The financing team continues to monitor the interest cost and
investment earnings of the 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program,
Series A, B and C Certificates of Participation (COP) issues and to
provide periodic reports to the Directors. The Committee reviewed a
staff report providing the details for the following summary:
Total Net True
COP Interest Interest Interest Interest
ISSUE Paid Earned (Cost) Earnings (Cost) Earninas
SERIES A 5 7,051,256 $10,979,414 $3,928,157 1.7057%
SERIES B 15,322,119 14,072,921 (1,249,197) (0.5827%)
SERIES 1,319.739 1 ,755.856 436,117 3.3319%
��/ COMBINED $23.693.114 $26.808.191 $3.115.077 1.3614%
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 2
April 22, 1993
Although we have borrowed approximately $316 million since late
1990, we have actually realized a $3,115,077 (1 .36%) interest
earnings to date.
2. STRATEGY FOR FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP (1993
SWAP).
At the regular April Joint Board meeting, the Directors authorized
preliminary work to proceed on structuring a fixed-to-floating interest
rate SWAP (1993 SWAP), subject to final authorization to conduct the
transaction by the Boards. The estimated annual earnings from this
transaction range between $1 and $4 million. Accordingly, the
financing team, consisting of Districts' staff, Merrill Lynch and
PaineWebber, have been working closely with both rating agencies,
Standard and Poor's and Moody's, towards the development of a
1993 fixed-to-floating rate SWAP strategy. Discussions with both
agencies have focused on the Districts' 10-year projections of user
fees, cash reserves, and debt service coverage.
Staff reported that Standard and Poor's (S&P) will use the Districts'
cash flow projections to decide on the extent to which the Districts
may proceed with a fixed-to-floating rate SWAP, which increases the
Districts' variable interest rate exposure. S&P is focusing on the
Districts' strong financial management as evidenced by 10-year cash
flows demonstrating stable and increasing user fees commensurate
with anticipated budget requirements, consistent and ascending cash
reserves, and sufficient debt obligation coverages as required by our
COP covenants. (See cash flows included under Item 6.) Moody's
has not yet indicated whether they will participate in these planning
discussions.
Since the Directors will be considering FY 93-94 user and connection
fee requirements (see Item 6) and bond counsel (see Item 4) between
now and the regular May 12 Joint Board meeting, it is appropriate to
delay consideration of the 1993 SWAP to await the outcomes of these
decisions by the Boards before concluding discussions with the rating
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 3
April 22, 1993
agencies. Staff will return in May to the Committee with a
recommended 1993 SWAP strategy and structure for consideration, as
well as compensation arrangements for Merrill Lynch, PaineWebber
and bond counsel.
3. ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION. 1993
SERIES 1 .
At the April Joint Board meeting, the Directors authorized preliminary
work to proceed on structuring the Refunding Certificates of
Participation, 1993 Series 1 , subject to final authorization to conduct
the transaction by the Boards, and once a targeted 3% savings level is
achieved. The transaction would achieve at least a $2.5 million
interest cost savings once the targeted 3% savings level is achieved.
Staff reported that they and Merrill Lynch have been monitoring
recently declining municipal interest rates to determine if it would be
advantageous to refund the remaining 1990-92 Series B COPs. The
market has worsened since the March Fiscal Policy Committee, making
an advance refunding of the remaining Series B less attractive.
However, a number of key market strategists continue to expect long-
term interest rates to decline further this year. Such movement would
then allow the Districts to proceed with an advance refunding which
would achieve the targeted 3% savings.
The enclosed report (green) indicates that the market was between 72
and 87 basis points away from the 3% targeted savings level in early
April. It is about 10 basis points closer today.
Staff, Merrill Lynch, bond counsel and underwriter's counsel will to
continue to monitor market performance and will proceed with
preliminary steps to structure and bring to market the Refunding
Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series 1 , once the 3% level is
achieved, probably in June or July.
Since the Directors will be considering bond counsel between now and
the regular May 12 Joint Board meeting (see Item 4), it is appropriate
to delay consideration of the transaction awaiting the outcome of
�1
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 4
April 22, 1993
this decision by the Boards. Staff will return in May to the Committee
with an update and any recommended 1993 refunding actions for
approval, as well as compensation arrangements for Merrill Lynch and
bond counsel.
Staff also has submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board
the enclosed March 25, 1993 letter (gold), requesting consideration of
refinancing of a 1990-92 Series B term bond with State Revolving
Fund (SRF) bonds. The interest rate would be one-half of the state
general obligation bond rate (currently less than 2%). The state
intends to respond to our request at its June 1993 hearing.
4. SELECTION OF FIRMS TO PROVIDE BOND COUNSEL AND
UNDERWRITER'S COUNSEL SERVICES.
The Joint Boards directed staff and General Counsel to submit a list of
three firms to provide special bond counsel services for Refunding
Certificates of Participation, 1993, Series 1 , and the Fixed-to-Floating
Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP), for consideration by the Fiscal
Policy Committee at this meeting.
General Counsel has reviewed the qualifications of several bond
counsel firms to provide special bond counsel services for both
potential transactions. General Counsel reviewed the enclosed (gray)
April 7, 1993 memorandum summarizing his review discussions and
proposals from several firms. A copy of the 1992 California bond
counsel rankings is also enclosed (pink).
Recommended Action
The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends:
1 . That the Boards select Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe to serve as
special bond counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of
Participation, 1993 Series 1 , and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest
Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP). A service and compensation
agreement will be considered at a later meeting.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 5
April 22, 1993
2. That the Boards select Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin as special
co-bond counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of
Participation, 1993 Series 1 , and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest
Rate SWAP, (1993 SWAP). A service and compensation
agreement will be considered at a later meeting.
3. That the Boards request the law firms of either Brown & Wood or
Jones, Hall, Hill & White to serve as underwriter's counsel on the
Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series.
(The Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP [1993 SWAP] does not
require underwriter's counsel, since it is not a public offering.)
5. POTENTIAL OWNER CONTROLLED WRAP-UP INSURANCE PROGRAM.
Districts' staff and insurance broker, Robert F. Driver Associates, have
worked closely to prepare a new Districts'.insurance program concept
which they presented for consideration by the Committee. The
concept, referred to as an Owner-Controlled Wrap-up Insurance
Program, is a centralized and coordinated insurance and loss
prevention program that provides coverages for job site construction
and contractor risk for all participating parties. Wrap-up insurance
coverages include workers' compensation, general liability, excess
liability, excess automobile and project errors and omissions.
Implementation of such a program by the Districts would require
specific approval by the State Legislature. The Districts' Risk
Management Task Force is also currently reviewing the proposed
program.
Based on a $200 million Districts' construction program during three
years (1993/94 - 1995/96), it is estimated that the Districts could
realize approximately $2,528,000 in projected insurance cost savings
over the three years.
The Committee, staff and consultants reviewed the concept at length
using the enclosed bound report on the program's advantages,
expected cost savings, management of a successful wrap-up program,
and first steps to forming a wrap-up program.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 6
April 22, 1993
Recommended Actions
The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends:
1 . Staff and general counsel be authorized to take steps necessary to
seek approval by the State Legislature.
3. Staff and Robert F. Driver Associates return to the Fiscal Policy
Committee with a draft of program details, staffing and other
costs, and an implementation schedule for further consideration.
6. 1993-94 SEWER USE AND CONNECTION FEE RECOMMENDATIONS.
Each property connected to a sewer system in each of the Districts,
except District No. 14, pays an annual sewer use fee which partially
finances operating, maintenance, replacement (OM&R) costs and debt
service used to fund sewerage system improvements. (Properties in
District No. 14 are billed by the IRWD.) Each District, except District
No. 13, also receives a share of the ad valorem property tax which is
applied to debt service. New development must pay a one-time sewer
connection fee which finances capital expansion of the sewerage
system. Again, District No. 14 is the exception because IRWD pays
its share of capital expansion.
Last year, because of the poor economic climate, staff recommended
and the Boards agreed not to increase user or connection fees over the
1991-92 rates. In order to do this, certain Districts' programs were
scaled back.
Subsequently, the Governor and State Legislature confiscated a portion
of the Districts' property taxes and shifted them to help finance
schools. After lengthy deliberations, the Boards concluded that they
had no really viable alternative but to increase the user fees to make
up for the confiscation of property taxes by the State. Again this year,
the State has proposed confiscating the balance of the Districts'
historical share of the property tax. Whether that happens and the
extent of the confiscation are not known at this time, and will not be
known before budgets must be completed for 1993-94.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 7
April 22, 1993
Economic conditions have generally not improved. Although the
Districts enjoy the ability to increase fees to pay for the rising costs of
wastewater services, the staff is sensitive to the continuing economic
situation and the very difficult financial problems our members
agencies are struggling with, exacerbated by the state's reduction of
revenues at other levels of local government; most of which are unable
to be replaced by fees.
Although costs of complying with stricter environmental and public
health standards continue to rise, the General Manager has directed
staff to again prepare a "hold-the-line" budget for 1993-94, and is
recommending that sewer use and connection fees not be increased in
1993-94. These are the same rates adopted for 1991-92 and 1992-
93, except that user fees for 1992-93 were ultimately increased for
the confiscation of property taxes approved by the State in September
1992.
However, if the Governor's proposal to eliminate the remainder of the
Districts' property tax revenue is approved by the State Legislature, as
in last year the Districts will have no alternative but to raise user fees
to make up for the property tax loss.
The Committee reviewed the enclosed report, dated April 15, 1993
(ivory), and preliminary summary cash flows (tan) addressing the
impacts of continuing the service and connection fee rates, as well as
the potential loss of remaining ad valorem property taxes.
Director Swan distributed the enclosed blue package of information
from another group he works with, regarding the proposed property
tax shift, for the Directors' information.
Recommended Action
The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the Directors declare that
the current 1992-93 sewer use fees and connection fees will not be
increased next year and will continue at the same rates for 1993-94,
provided the Governor and State Legislature do not confiscate
Districts' property taxes, as follows:
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 8
April 22, 1993
ANNUAL SEWER USE FEES - 1993-94
District Single-Family Multi-Family Non-Residential
No. Residential Residential Properties
1 $ 83.24 $49.94/Unit $59.52/1,000 SF
2 71.52 42.91/Unit 51.14/1,000 SF
3 73.89 44.33/Unit 52.83/1,000 SF
5 96.75 58.05/Unit 69.18/1,000 SF
6 76.47 45.88/Unit 54.68/1,000 SF
7 50.09 30.05/Unit 35.8111,000 SF
11 60.00 36.00/Unit 42.90/1,000 SF
13 100.00 60.00/Unit 71.50/1,000 SF
14 NONE - District No. 14 is fully funded by IRWD
CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION FEES - 1993-94
DISTRICTS NOS. 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 11 & 13
RESIDENTIAL: $2,350/DWELLING UNIT
NON-RESIDENTIAL: $470/1,000 SQUARE FEET, $2,350 MINIMUM
DISTRICT NO. 14
NONE - District No. 14 is fully funded by IRWD.
The Committee also noted that should the balance of the Districts'
property taxes be confiscated, the rates would increase between
30% and 92%.
7.(a) DISTRICTS' ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SOURCE CONTROL FEES
ADMINISTRATIVE FEES. NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES AND
MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES.
The Committee reviewed the enclosed staff report (buff) regarding
potential revisions to the Ordinance Establishing Source Control Fees,
Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Fees, and Miscellaneous
Charges (Fee Ordinance). The fees and charges established by the
Fee Ordinance pursuant to the February 7, 1992 Wastewater
Discharge Regulations (WDR Ordinance) are intended to provide
revenue to assist in the enforcement of the WDR Ordinance and
recover costs of administering the Districts' Source Control Program,
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 9
April 22, 1993
and certain costs of operation and maintenance of the Districts'
sewerage system (annual sewer use fees for industrial dischargers
are direct charges pursuant to other WDR provisions). These include
fees for wastewater discharge permits; fees for the treatment and
disposal of trucked wastes; fees for the collection and processing of
water consumption data and tax data; and fees for sampling non-
compliant dischargers. An evaluation of the present fees and charges
has shown that for a number of cases, revisions at this time may be
appropriate to reflect the actual cost of providing services for which
the fees are levied.
Staff reported that the Districts' Source Control Division periodically
reviews fees and charges established in the Fee Ordinance as they
relate to costs associated with the pretreatment program. Based on
this review, the actual costs for the following fees and charges have
changed in accordance with changes in sewerage system and
administrative costs:
• Fees for the issuance of Class I and Class 11 Permits;
• Waste hauler charges; and
• Non-compliance sampling fees and analytical charges.
In addition, to ensure that the full costs of the waste hauler program
are recovered, two new fees should be considered for incorporation
into the Districts' fee structure:
• Charges for prearranged discharges to the Waste Hauler Station
after regular operating hours; and
• Charges for emergency discharges to the Waste Hauler Station
after regular operating hours.
Recommended Action
The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the Directors adjust the
fees according to the estimated cost increases, in order that costs
would be directly recovered from the applicable users, in accordance
.� with Table I and Table 11 of the staff report.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 10
April 22, 1993
7.(b) STUDY RE MODIFIED SEWER CONNECTION FEES FOR LOW
INCOME/SENIOR CITIZEN PROJECTS
At the Regular Board Meeting on April 14, 1993, the Directors of
District No. 3 received a request for a reduction in sewer connection
fees for the Park Stanton Senior Citizen Apartments within the City
of Stanton. The project includes 335 affordable senior citizen
apartments, located on Katella Avenue just west of Beach Boulevard.
The request was made by the developer and District No. 3 Chairman
Sapien. Both pointed out that this is a much-needed project to serve
the growing senior population. For the Park Stanton Senior Citizen
Apartment project, 30 of the 335 units are designated as Very Low
Income units and the other 305 units will be available for Low to
Moderate Income senior citizens. Because the units are smaller than
a typical single-family dwelling, ranging from 450 square feet to 750
square feet, a reduction in the connection fee of $2,350 per dwelling
unit was requested.
The issue was discussed at the April Board meeting by the Directors
of all of the Districts. It was deemed a policy matter and referred to
the Fiscal Policy Committee for further consideration.
The Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed the staff report and discussed
the issues related to reducing connection fees in the context of the
intent and purpose of the connection fee to finance the actual capital
costs of new sewerage facilities to serve the development for which
the fee is charged. In terms of financing of the needed construction
and rehabilitation of the collection, treatment and disposal facilities
operated by the Districts, the Directors noted that connection fees
only partially finance capital projects, including sewers, the treatment
facilities and the outfall system. As pointed out in the April 7, 1993
staff report on this subject (salmon copy enclosed), these capital
charges are not sufficient to cover the need for new facilities, and
over the last few years the Districts have issued about $400 million
in debt to build needed facilities. The cost of capital facilities is not
as directly related to average flows, or lower than average flows, as
the operational costs of the system. Capital facilities are built for
peak conditions and can be more closely charged on a per-dwelling
unit basis than operational costs, (financed by user fees) which are
reduced by lower flows. The Committee also noted the following:
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 11
April 22, 1993
• The purpose of the connection fee is that those placing a demand
on the system shall pay for it.
• There is not necessarily a relationship between the size of a
dwelling and its occupancy and, therefore, the demand place on
the sewerage system.
• Lowering connection fees for users shifts the cost of capital
facilities to other users. Reducing connection fees for one project
would result in higher fees for other projects or high debt issues,
thereby raising annual charges which service debt and are paid by
everyone.
• In the future, as additional senior facilities are constructed in
response to this area's and the country's aging population, the
shift would worsen, the day of reckoning would simply be
delayed, and that new or increased taxes/user fees would
ultimately be required.
• A reduction in connection fees would not produce a significant
change in the development's project costs. For instance, for the
Park Stanton project, a $500 reduction in connection fees would
save $167,500, .7% of the project's estimated total cost of
$23,000,000.
• Other similar projects that paid the full connection fee have been
built in many cities, and it would be discriminatory to now reduce
fees for such new projects. To date, no requested fee
adjustments have been approved.
• Members were concerned about general policy which may lead to
much higher administrative costs; for instance, each project would
have to be monitored by staff. Some low income projects revert
after a number of years to a different status which may not
include low income provisions. Members were concerned that
the administrative costs may be excessive to monitor such a
program.
r
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 12
April 22, 1993
Recommendation
For the above reasons, the Fiscal Policy Committee recommends that
no further study be given to this issue of modifying sewer connection
fees and that no change be made to the existing policy.
B. CORF 1993-94 BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS.
The "2020 VISION" Master Plan adopted by the Directors in 1989
provided a schedule of facilities needed to meet projected
wastewater treatment needs for thirty years. Each year these
projections are reevaluated by staff in light of current flow
requirements, required levels of treatment, both in terms of
compliance with higher environmental standards imposed by
regulatory agencies as well as growth within the service area, and
economic conditions, and a 10-year capital outlay revolving fund
)CORF) budget for jointly owned treatment facilities is prepared.
The preliminary 1993-94 CORF Budget presented for the
Committee's consideration amounts to $70.0 million, down from
$80.6 million for 1992-93, and from $114.1 million for 1991-92
The Committee reviewed two draft preliminary estimates of the
1993-94 CORF construction budget, including 10-year projections
and costs to complete the master-planned facilities, and directed
staff to include the approved preliminary CORF Budget for 1993-94
in the Joint Works Budget to be considered by the Committee at the
May meeting.
9. PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS.
During the annual budget preparation process, the staff evaluates
personnel requirements for the upcoming and future fiscal years.
This review of staffing needs takes into consideration programs set
forth in the Boards' 30-year Wastewater Management Action Plan,
"2020 VISION," adopted by the Directors in 1989, anticipated new
or expanded regulations and programmatic changes, the start up of
new facilities and the ongoing maintenance and operation of the
existing joint works treatment facilities and the individual Districts'
collection systems.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 13
April 22, 1993
Last year, the Directors adopted a personnel budget with a decrease
of five authorized positions. For 1993-94, staff is proposing a further
net reduction of one authorized position at an estimated annual
savings of $42,732.
The Committee reviewed a staff report detailing the proposed
changes, and directed staff to include the changes in the Joint Works
Operating Budget to be considered at the May Committee meeting.
10, PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN DAILY EFFORT (PRIDE).
The Committee reviewed several PRIDE suggestions that staff had
submitted for consideration and evaluation. Certificates and cash
awards totaling $4,856.30, in accordance with the Board-approved
PRIDE program were approved. These ten PRIDE proposals are
estimated to save the Districts approximately $62,035.
11 . 1993 SUMMER WORK PROGRAM.
For several years, the Boards have authorized a summer work
program which allows us to complete backlogged routine painting,
groundskeeping and general cleanup work which can best be done in
the warm summer months when temporary help (mostly students) is
available. Staff has recommended continuation of the summer work
program for 1993. The estimated cost is $225,000 for materials,
supplies and wages for 38 part-time helpers from May 24, 1993,
through September 24, 1993. Our Maintenance Department has
determined that the summer work program saves approximately
$150,000 annually from what it would cost to perform the
equivalent amount of work with full-time, permanent staff.
Recommended Action
The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends that the Directors approve
and authorize the summer work program for 1993 in an estimated
amount of $225,000.
JWS:lc
\� REF:J:IN DOCTK.MTG\RFKC 21.93
Enclosures
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
c 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 9270E-7018
�I �44'°ecWY� (714)9822411
March 25, 1993
Mr. John P. Caffrey
Acting Chairman
State Water Resources Control Board
901 P. Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Re: SRF Loan for Interplant Pipeline, Job No. 1-9
Dear Mr. Caffrey:
The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) are interested in
participating in the SRF Loan Program to the maximum extent practical. The
Districts, therefore, respectfully request consideration of refinancing for the
Interplant Pipeline Job No. 1-9 under the provisions of Section 633(d)(2), which
provides that the SRF may be used to refinance local debt obligations at or
below market rates where the debt was incurred after March 7, 1985. Our debt
for this project was incurred in 1991 . It is our further understanding that the
refinancing of existing debt obligations are eligible to receive SRF loan funding if
the project construction was initiated after October 1, 1988. The Districts
began construction of the $23 million Interplant Pipeline project on
September 11, 1991 .
We understand that our participation in the program would be mutually
beneficial. Since construction of Job No. 1-9 is scheduled for completion during
May 1993, the Districts could benefit the SRF program by beginning repayment
of the SRF loan by May 1993 and, as a result, much needed inflow of loan
repayments to the SRF Loan Program would be provided in the near future. In
addition, the Districts would agree to a shorter repayment period of 14 years
(2007). The Districts would benefit from significant interest cost savings if a
portion of its $117,555,000 Series B Certificates of Participation Issue dated
May 7, 1991 could be refinanced under the SRF program.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
Mr. John P. Caffrey 10944 ELLIS AVENUE
Ro 8OX e,n
State Water Resources Control Board FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CAUFORNA 9272,
Page 2
March 25, 1993
We have been informed that the SRF loan program policy requires that applicants
solicit the participation of Minority and Women Business Enterprises (MBE/WBE)
on SRF loan projects. The Districts have not applied for state or federal financial
participation since 1983 and, therefore, have not solicited MBE/WBE
participation on construction projects. In our judgment, the retroactive
application of MBE/WBE requirements to projects being considered for
refinancing local debt is impractical. In the future, the Sanitation Districts would
include MBE/WBE participation requirements for projects where SRF loans may
be possible.
Therefore, in order to accommodate this mutually beneficial transaction, we
respectfully request that the SWRCB waive the SRF loan policy requirement for
MBE/WBE participation for this project, and give favorable consideration to SRF
refinancing for the Districts' Interplant Pipeline Job No. 1-9 project.
Our staff would welcome the opportunity to discuss our application with the
SWRCB or your staff at your convenience.
Thank you for your consideration.
Si rely,
J. ayne ylvester
G eral nager
JWS:lc
NE F:J:\W PDO CSU W SLLTJ W 53.8
cc: James M. Stubchaer, SWRCB Member
Marc Del Piero, SWRCB Member
Walt Pettit, SWRCB
Harry Schueller, SWRCB
Farouk Ismail, SWRCB
Gary D. Hoffmann, SWRCB
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager
Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering
1 _
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY
Information for:
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
ADVANCE REFUNDING
CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, 1993 Series I
April21, 1993
l
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, 1993 Series I
Table of Contents
HISTORICAL RATE CHART
TRADITIONAL FIXED RATE ADVANCE REFUNDING
TRADITIONAL REFUNDING w/ INVERSE FLOATERS
SYNTHETIC FIXED RATE ADVANCE REFUNDING
e . � �°'ti
� `, ', �
`° `. i
en' e6B
� � '� �
i
E '; `
� ' `i
'� ` ���
til `;
o �: +.
' }� t, r��
b �
� L r6i
� ,� � ���6
0 1
� i r6j��8
L
� s l �'�c
b �
� �' ��
r�
£�
�6/
� � � � ��
� � �
��
v.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation
1993 Series I
Rates as of 04/07/93
TRADTTIOM REEUNDiNG TRU TURE )INV RS ;F.L04
CURRENT MKT CURRENT MKT
as of 04/07/93 LESS 81 BP
PAR AMOUNT $55,030,000 $58,030,000
GROSS SAVINGS ($735,563) $2,470,122
PV SAVINGS % -0.746% 3.011%
ARBITRAGE TIC 5.663% 4.835%
AVG. ANNUAL SAVINGS ($31,301 $105,112
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation
1993 Series I
Rates as of 04/07/93
TRADITION Y;;FIXW1ZA1" N VA.( E,�I+UNDING-,STRCJCTURE >,F
CURRENT MKT CURRENT MKT
as of 04/07/93 LESS 87 BP
PARAMOUNT $54,825,000 $58,045,000
GROSS SAVINGS ($947,066) $2,477,079
PV SAVINGS % -0.980% 3.000%
ARBITRAGE TIC 5.720% 4.831%
AVG. ANNUAL SAVINGS ($40,301 $105,408
v
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation
1993 Series I
Rates as of 04/07/93
UNDINGiSTRIICTt
CURRENT MKT CURRENT MKT
as of 04/07/93 LESS 72 BP
PARAMOUNT $55,405,000 $58,050,000
GROSS SAVINGS ($335,758) $2,486,206
PV SAVINGS % -0.308% 3.032%
ARBITRAGE TIC 5.556% 4.830%
AVG. ANNUAL SAVINGS ($14,288 $105,796
Soda 5e�utesJ'�attteyaltt .
992Onda� tnsel
TOaRti 5.:'.
The top California bond counsel firms are ranked accord-
ing to the number of long-term new issues they served on in
1992. Principal
Mkt. Amount
Bond Counsel Issues Rank Share ($ mil.)
Orrick, Herrington
& Sutcliffe 210 1 24.8% $11,303
Jones Hall Hill & White 168 2 19.8 2,791
Brown & Wood 86 3 10.1 2,130
Stradling, Yocca,
Carlson & Rauth 53 4 6.3 983
Best, Best & Krieger 36 5 4.2 301
Sturgis, Ness, Brunsell
& Sperry 32 6 3.8 187
O'Melveny & Myers 29 7 3.4 2,890
Brown & Diven 23 8 2.7 100
Arnelle & Hasde 21 9 2.5 1,173
Pamela S. Jue, P.C. 15 10 1.8 924
COUNTY SANrrmim DISTRICTS
April 15, 1993 .1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10040 ELLIB AVEWE
PO BO%B127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,GLIFOANIA 92728.8121
17141952.2411
STAFF REPORT
1993-94 SEWER USE AND CONNECTION FEE RECOMMENDATIONS
SUMMARY
Each property connected to a sewer system in each of the Districts, except
District No. 14, pays an annual sewer use fee which partially finances
operating, maintenance, replacement (OM&R) costs and debt service used to
fund sewerage system improvements. (Properties in District No. 14 are
billed by the IRWD.) Each District, except District No. 13, also receives a
share of the ad valorem property tax which is applied to debt service. New
development must pay a one-time sewer connection fee which finances
capital expansion of the sewerage system. Again, District No. 14 is the
exception because IRWD pays its share of capital expansion.
Last year, because of the poor economic climate, staff recommended and
the Boards agreed not to increase user or connection fees over the 1991-92
rates. In order to do this, certain Districts' programs were scaled back.
Subsequently, the Governor and State Legislature confiscated a portion of
the Districts' property taxes and shifted them to help finance schools. After
lengthy deliberations, the Boards concluded that they had no really viable
alternative but to increase the user fees to make up for the confiscation of
property taxes by the State. Again this year, the State has proposed
confiscating the balance of the Districts' historical share of the property tax.
Whether that happens and the extent of the confiscation are not known at
this time, and will not be known before budgets must be completed for
1993-94.
Economic conditions have generally not improved. Although the Districts
enjoy the ability to increase fees to pay for the rising costs of wastewater
services, the staff is sensitive to the continuing economic situation and the
very difficult financial problems our members agencies are struggling with,
exacerbated by the state's reduction of revenues at other levels of local
government; most of which are unable to be replaced by fees.
1993-94 Fee Recommendations
Page 2
April 15, 1993
Although costs of complying with stricter environmental and public health
standards continue to rise, the General Manager has directed staff to again
prepare a "hold-the-line" budget for 1993-94, and is recommending that
sewer use and connection fees not be increased in 1993-94. These are the
same rates adopted for 1991-92 and 1992-93, except that user fees for
1992-93 were ultimately increased for the confiscation of property taxes
approved by the State in September 1992.
However, if the Governor's proposal to eliminate the remainder of the
Districts' property tax revenue is approved by the State Legislature, as in last
year the Districts will have no alternative but to raise user fees to make up
for the property tax loss.
BACKGROUND
During the 1980's and early 1990's, each of the Districts has had to
consider the adoption of a sewer use fee for ongoing operations,
maintenance and rehabilitation costs. Although property taxes, connection
fees and federal and state construction grants have historically been the
major sources of financing of Districts' activities, they became inadequate
over the past decade. After the passage of Proposition 13, all ad valorem
property tax revenue has been used in the Operating Funds for maintenance,
operations and rehabilitation. Beginning in 1991-92, ad valorem property tax
receipts were dedicated to be first used to repay the principal and interest
due for COP issues. No property tax revenue has been directly available for
capital improvements. The costs of providing service have risen beyond the
ability of the property tax apportionments to keep pace with the increasingly
stringent requirements of the federal, state and regional regulatory agencies
for wastewater treatment to protect public health and the environment.
In addition to new regulatory requirements, cost increases are also
attributable to inflation, and to additional flows generated by the natural
population increases from the excess of births over deaths and in-migration
and additional residential, commercial and industrial development. Federal
and state assistance from the clean water grant program has essentially
been eliminated by Congress because of federal funding problems.
1993-94 Fee Recommendations
Page 3
April 15, 1993
All Districts except Nos. 13 and 14 currently receive an allocation of the 1 %
basic property tax levy equal to approximately 3% of the 1 % basic levy (i.e.,
$30/year on a $100,000 home). District No. 13 is fully funded by user fees
and District No. 14 is fully funded by the IRWD.
FUTURE FINANCING PROJECTIONS
As a part of the rate setting process, staff has analyzed Statements of
Projected Cash Flows for Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 and 13 prepared
in accordance with the adopted "2020 VISION" Financial Plan
recommendations, adjusted to reflect changing circumstances. Under the
Plan, each District's share of the treatment plant construction, and its
respective trunk sewer construction projects are to be financed by a
combination of increased connection fees to pay for new capacity and
borrowing to pay for rehabilitation and improved treatment. Debt retirement
and operating and maintenance costs are to be paid by a combination of
property taxes and the annual sewer use fees, under the following
assumptions:
1. Renewal of NPDES Permit and Continuation of Current Treatment
Levels (301 (h) Waiver)
This scenario represents the minimum probable level of construction,
rehabilitation and operations and maintenance costs. For the first
five years of the planning period, the differences between renewal
of our existing permit and full secondary treatment are not
significant. Increased annual flow projections and new sewer
service connections have been revised downward from the 1989
Master Plan to reflect current and expected economic development
and levels of flow.
2. Connection Fees
' The capital facilities connection fee includes the cost of future and
existing facilities on a per unit basis. The reason to include future
costs is that any new flow will require new, additional facilities and
capacity.
1993-94 Fee Recommendations
Page 4
April 15, 1993
The Board-approved connection fee policy provides for an annual
adjustment of fees to reflect changes in the Engineering News
Record-LA construction cost index. Connection fees are uniform
throughout the Districts. Staff is recommending that the fees for
1993-94 remain unchanged from the 1991-92 and 1992-93 rates of
$2,350 per residential unit and $470 per 1,000 square feet of floor
area for non-residential properties. A 5% per year increase is
projected from 1994-95 through 2001-2002 for cash flow analysis.
3. Debt/Borrowing
Over the next 10 years, all of the Districts except Nos. 13 and 14
are projected to issue additional COP-type debt to meet a portion of
Joint Works treatment facilities improvements. Borrowing has been
a part of.the long-range financial plan for capital improvements since
1979 when the policy of using all property tax revenues for
operations, maintenance and rehabilitation was implemented.
Extensive use of the now discontinued Federal and State Clean
Water Grant Program enabled the Districts to stretch out their
reserves and other income and to generally avoid borrowing until
1990. Three primary reasons to issue debt are: to protect and to
preserve capital reserves; to avoid major increases and fluctuations
in user fees from year-to-year; and to spread the cost of facilities
over their useful lives.
The cash flow projections include periodic COP issues to meet
capital project award and cash flow requirements, and to avoid
federal interest earnings restrictions and penalties.
4. Reserves
As a part of the financial plan developed by the team of Directors,
staff and consultants, the Boards have implemented a plan to build
reserves for certain future events. The current reserve policy calls
for Dry Period Funding Reserves, Contingency Reserves, Capital
Project Reserves, Insurance Reserves, Environmental Requirement
Reserves, and Debt Service Reserves. When an adequate funding
level for these reserves has been reached, a Fee Stabilization Fund
will be created.
1993-94 Fee Recommendations
' Page 5
April 15, 1993
5. Capital Improvement Projects
As the Directors are aware, the Districts are continuing to
experience reductions in flow from previous years. This flow
reduction and the economic climate have caused staff to review the
timing of the capital improvement program. Accordingly, projects
for certain additional capacity and improved treatment are proposed
to be delayed, resulting in the ability to postpone some COP issues.
6. Ad Valorem Property Taxes
The cash flow projections are based on the continuing receipt of ad
valorem property taxes at the same level as allocated by the County
for 1992-93. However, the Governor's state budget submittal
proposes a final shift of all remaining local property tax revenues
from certain special districts which perform enterprise activities to
school districts. Should the legislature ultimately implement this
proposal, the revenue loss would need to be made up from
i increased sewer user fees. The impact on user fees is also shown
on the cash flow projections. This proposal is discussed more
thoroughly later in this report.
1993-94 USER FEE RECOMMENDATIONS
Taking all the above assumptions into consideration and the current and
projected near-term economic climate, staff is again preparing a "hold-the-
line" budget. The portion of each individual District's total operations,
maintenance and COP service budget, determined largely by the Joint
Operating Fund budget to operate and maintain the treatment and disposal
facilities, is approximately 51 %. Keeping this significant portion of the
operating budget constant and rescheduling certain capital projects, thereby
minimizing additional borrowing and subsequent repayment will allow the
Districts to maintain the 1992-93 user fee rates for 1993-94 subject to the
final determination by the Governor and the State Legislature regarding
taking of our property taxes.
1993-94 Fee Recommendations
Page 6
April 15, 1993
The following table shows the single-family residential user fee rates for
1993-94 that were anticipated in September 1992 when the 1992-93 rates
were adjusted for the property tax confiscation by the State, the predicted
rates in the "2020 VISION" Master Plan, and the revised rates now
proposed.
ANNUAL SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USER FEES
1993-94
Anticipated When Predicted
92-93 Rates Were in 1992-93 and
District Adjusted "2020 VISION" Proposed 93-94
1 $103.56 $100.00 $83.24
2 81.95 75.00 71.52
3 79.43 100.00 73.89
5 102.53 100.00 96.75
6 81.91 100.00 76.47
7 50.47 50.00 50.09
11 77.93 175.00 60.00
13 100.00 95.00 100.00
Weighted Avg. IL $90.44 $71 .28
GOVERNOR'S PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX SHIFT
The Governor's state budget proposal includes a $150 million shift of the
remainder of local property tax revenues from certain enterprise special
districts (i.e., water, sewer, solid waste, etc.) to school districts. The
proposal is estimated to affect about 1 ,500 special districts statewide,
including the Sanitation Districts. The Governor's budget message states,
"This amount represents the current estimated amount of property tax
revenue that is subsidizing enterprise functions which, by definition, should
be self-supporting from charges for services." In other words, the taxes
should be replaced by fees.
1993-94 Fee Recommendations
Page 7
April 15, 1993
As mentioned above, under Assumption 6, the user fee rates proposed by
staff were calculated by including the Districts' historical share of the
property tax as a revenue item in the operating funds. Attachment A
summarizes the impact of the Governor's proposal to eliminate the $30.7
million in annual property tax revenues allocated to the Districts for
1992-93. This preliminary $30.7 million that the Governor proposes to shift
from the Sanitation Districts to school districts represents 20% of the
preliminary operating budget which includes required reserves carried
forward from year to year. However, the impact on operating revenues is
far greater. The $30.7 million loss in property tax allocations would
represent 31 % of the Districts' $99.4 million operating fund cash flow
requirements for 1993-94.
Should the Governor's proposal ultimately be adopted by the Legislature, the
Districts would have no viable alternative but to increase sewer use fees to make
up for the $30.7 million property tax loss. Use fees would have to be increased an
average of 50% or $35.67 per year. The percentage increase in fees ranges from
30°% to 92% while the dollar increases range from $25.05 to $88.74 per year.
Staff continues to monitor the Governor's proposal and will keep the Directors
�./ advised.
GGS:lc
REF:JAS..w.F.MMMUSEFEE.3
Enclosures
1 4131/03 U 036.XLS 10:39 AM
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.1 TRW 14 Reamed 4127I93
STATEMENT W PROJECTED CASH FLOW No Fee Unpa For 83-94
N6CJL YFAR91952-1903 TNROUGN 2001.2W2 Rep Tan.Cmetmt At 92-93 Level
Ran,A9mry 0.......
Eetimettl 5Rv TOttl 5-Yeah,T01x
LINE 1B93 B3 19B}90 199484 1BB895 1996.97 1992.1997 I997-t002 1UYsw 701 LINE
1 OPERATINO FUND 1
2 9eeme.8 Cam,Over Fnrn Lear Yes 113,401,000 148.)53,000 1851395.W0 178,258.000 106.843.600 113.481.000 188,958.500 113,481.000 2
3 REVENUE 3
4 Uwex 1%The A600etien 30J43.000 30.743,00D 30.743.WD 30,743.000 30.743,O00 153,715,O00 153,715,0D0 307.430,000 4
6 Fees:Industrial When 5.095.000 8,29O.O00 7,797,00D 0,907,WO 10.313,O00 39.752,000 78.86D.O00 119,732.000 5
0 U.Fan 62.910.000 83,051,000 07.431.000 73.))9,O0D 80.617.000 34),)90.000 533.525,O00 691,321.WO 6
Intwaet 9 Nion-no.Inane 1AW5.OW 11,242,000 12,295,ODO 13.002,000 13.439.000 04.673.000 68.5351000 133,108.WO )
8 Troutw tract,COP F6M. 2.BG9,OW 3.213,000 2.874,000 2.919,000 3,001,000 14,530,000 15,<O9.OW 30,205,000 8
9 Other Re-nu. 3,463,000 0 0 0 0 3,483.000 0 3.483.000 9
10 TOTAL REVENUE 120.423.O00 115,029.000 120.840.000 129.37D.U00 1U.1)3,000 523,835.000 881.424,000 1.485,259,WO 10
11 TOTAL AVAIIABEWROING 233.904.O00 284,7112.000 208.23S.000 307.828,00D 324,016,54X) 737.316.00 1,050.380.500 1.598.740.00D 11
12 EXPENDITURES 12
13 Shot.x Jaunt Wrote M A O 47,IM,OOO 49.048.W0 53,513,000 58,065,000 64.751.00O 272.915,000 434.857,000 707J72,000 13
14 CMrmhor SWtem M 60 n8 Other Oper. 11,316,000 12.585.W0 13,928,000 11.092.00t) 11.572.000 01,094,000 87.301,000 128.395,000 14
IS COP Servos 25,697,O00 38.154,0DO 40.535,O00 50,227,500 59.)3).WO 214.390.500 343,200.000 557,550,500 15
10 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 84,151,000 99,387.WO 107,077,000 120.704.500 136,050,000 548,359,500 845,364.00O 1,393,723,600 18
17 Reserve.6 Owry-Ovw to Neat Year 149.753.WO I65.395,000 178,258.WD IB6,843.600 188.856.500 16e,960,600 206.D36,500 205015,500 17
19 Next Year's Dm Forma Furvlinp Remosimnb 41,365.000 48.800,000 531201,WD 59,660.O00 67.12QW0 67.126,000 92,838,000 92.530,000 IB
19 ]O%Ceo9o9ern,Far lean COP wviul 11.695.WO 12.252,600 13,494.400 14,116.2W 15.3)1,W0 15,3)1,OW 2].91],5W 23.81310W 19
20 Fortieth of lnurame Fare,Urplos or Krelici0 OL703.Or 104,182.4W 111.562.600 113.1A.3W IW.459.SW IW,558,8W B8,6B],9W B8,663.9. 20
21 USER FEE DATA 21
22 SiWirr Fernih Resitlmu Lear Fee 171.29 171.29 175.16 I63.19 $90.67 1138.25 22
22.1 SFR Fee 98L93 Than Are Rust OV Fees 1105.95 9111.72 e118.56 1125.85 1172.42 22.1
22.2 6FR Fort From 2020 Visitors Mssompan 190.48 $91.27 1112.58 1112.04 41MA2 22.2
23 Numher of EAuivalenl 0weilirq Umt. 860,221 8811991 804.400 867,816 071.481 B99,881 23
24 Exime.el Um Fen,Excu6e.IFWD 01.318.000 01,451,000 65.831.000 )2.1)9.000 )9.01),00O 124.414.OW 24
4127/93 CF 9MALIF 10:39 AM
COUNTY SAMTATNIN 01 CT NO.1 THBU 14 8wiav44/2T013
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW P .2
FISCAL YEARS 1992 1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002
E.11.m S-Year Tad SYw Tdd
NNE 1992.93 1993-M t994-95 1995.96 IM-97 199?1997 1997Q002 IOY..TOtd UNE
25 CAPITAL FUND(S) 25
26 R —.&C.,.—.Emn Wt Y.. 180583,000 198.820.00D 221.235.DOO 245,934,550 280.198.050 188.503.000 201.890.700 168,563.000 26
27 1 ENUE 27
28 Cme&uct,m mama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
29 F.. Cmiwcem 4.162.000 5.676.000 7.930.000 10,011,000 12A47.000 40.7M.00O 95.897.000 136.022.000 28
30 . ..md Wwt. 2.3".000 2,505.000 2,674,000 g855,000 3.051.000 13.433.00D 18,095.000 32,180,000 30
31 U..F.. 8.000.000 8,400,000 10,200,000 5.500.000 4.700.000 3Q800.000 8.500.000 45,300.000 31
32 Sda 01 C. ..iry RgHU 1.303.000 1,421,000 744,000 2,033.000 2,917,000 8,318.000 2.226,000 10,544.000 32
33 Avyxstien Faaa 500.000 0 O 0 0 600,000 0 500.000 33
34 W.,..BMiacvllmswalncmro 13.1%.000 151094.000 I6.79I.ODO 18,193,000 19.483.000 82]45,000 88.855.000 171601,000 m
35 TTmd.P�me sOem COP F.d 76.315.000 86.580,000 94.785.550 101,318.600 88.220,650 447,200,700 787.950 417,980.050 35
36 OtM Rw.q. 9.787.000 1.400.000 500.000 2.585,000 0 14272000 8.000 14.280.000 >8
37 TOTAL REVENUE 114.600.000 121.075.000 133,MM,%O 142.490,500 132218.650 843,994,700 215.028.950 849,023.850 37
30 TOTAL AVAILA81E FUNDING 283.180,000 319.895.000 354.939.550 398,431,050 392A04700 812.657700 4 918,850 1.027.500.650 38
39 EXPENOITUIRS 39
40 Use M Jain Wm4a Teatmmt%mt 80.000.000 70.031,OD0 62,427,000 99,905,000 89,130,000 401,493,000 182,981.060 5&4474.000 40
41 Uu.d C~..Synam 18,302,ODO 22,429.000 25,I08,000 24.553.000 201186.000 113.744000 73.773.000 187.521,000 41
42 OIM1m 8.041.000 1,200,000 1,200.000 3.785.000 1,200,000 15.420,000 8000000 21426,000 42
43 TOTAL C% MDITWES O4.343.000 98,BBO,000 108.905,000 128.243.000 110,516,000 530.967.000 262764000 793,421,000 43
44 Ce td&Em4m.W Rq Nmww 198,820.000 221.235.000 245.9N.550 280.188,050 281,090.700 281,880.700 234,105550 234,166.550 44
45 S .d 100000.000 C.P"Nmmv. 1Og000,000 100,0D0,000 100,000.000 100,000,000 100.000.000 100,000.000 100,000.000 100,000,000 45
45 M..d 410.000,000 Ewi,.n R..we W..800,000 11.235.000 35.934.550 10.080.050 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 46
47 Pm d.wun..Re.Sm9.a w 10..nI 88,820,000 n1.235.000 1J5.93a,550 150.189.060 1T1.890. 1T169OT00 Ilia,165,850 124,165.850 47
40 Sm&Fatly RwNnw Cmmc6.n F.. $2.350 32,350 $2,470 $2.590 $2.720 $3.480 48
49 Nwm m d Now E9uivalmt Owdliq Udta 1,770 2,415 3,210 3.065 4.260 0.575 48
50 E.im WCmnactmn Fm In— 04,150,000 85.675.00D $7.929.000 a10,010,000 112.947,000 622,981.00D 50
I
4127183 6 93B.XL5 10.39 AM C
COUNTY SANITATION DISTNCT NO.1 THRO 14 Nwi%W 4127193
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED T 514 TIM Pe90 3
FISCAL MRS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2001-2002
&Yw TOW &Yew Teal
LINE IB9DB3 188&94 199L95 199586 1900.07 19021087 I907-2002 1O,Ywx TOW LINE
51 Dow FUND151 51
62 Reewvse 6 CNMOvW Fan Loot Yew 22.000 20.000 17.000 14.000 12.000 22,000 10.00D 22,000 52
63 IEVENUE 53
54 TOF Levy 12,000 12,000 12,000 13,000 13.000 62.000 28.000 90.000 54
55 Leven to 5ecNlnews lncwne 2.000 11000 1.000 1,000 1.000 01000 1.000 YO00 05
56 OIHer Nooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50
57 TOTALREENUE 14,M 13.000 13,000 14,000 14,000 6BWD 28.000 STAN 57
56 TOTAL AVAMBIE FUNDING 36.OD0 3],OOD 30,000 38.000 20,000 90000 30.000 II91000 58
59 EXPENDITURES 58
00 BwN PrleripN 0lntrest I6,000 16.000 15,000 16,000 16,000 00.000 31,000 111.00U 00
51 Trnmr Ip CgitM FrArb 0 0 O 0 0 0 8.000 81000 61
82 T0TAL EXPIRI TUIE6 18.000 10000 16,000 16,000 10000 00.000 38.000 119,000 62
63 Reservx B CwM-Ovw to Not Yew 20.000 17,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 10.000 0 0 63
54 Next Yew's Dry Poria6 Neel o Reewemenls 20 W0 1),OOD 14.000 121000 101000 10,000 0 0 64
55 FUM BNncs w IDNicol 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 05
60 cm LANDS 06
57 Rwwvw 6 Cwq.m&Frern Loot Yew 33,446,000 60.193.650 40.908.650 44,823.100 49.03.600 33.446,000 52,932.950 331445oOOD 07
69 REVENUE Be
68 New Boo-ot9 113,750,000 54,5001000 IO1.00O000 IIIW0,000 88.000,000 481,250,000 0 481.25(LO00 00
70 Invrw A Olin 210091000 3,213.000 2.574.000 2.S%9.000 3.061.000 14,536,000 13.658.000 30,205,000 70
71 Total Nevnue I 6.fi1B.000 8)]1300D 105.5)4.000 113818,000 101.061.000 505J86.000 15,669.000 521o55,000 71
72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 150.065.000 133.905,650 147.402.650 158.742.100 150,114,600 539.232.000 68,001.850 55419011000 72
73 EXPENDITURES 73
74 ggect Cam Trwetere to UNtal Faoseoe Furr0 75.315.000 88.5801000 84J05.550 101,318.500 80.220.850 447.200,700 )0),960 447,988,550 74
75 Mtwot EnneB Trnslne to Owe9rN FP 2.889,000 3.213.000 2,574,000 218181000 3,081.000 14,530,000 15.6691000 30,205.000 75
75 Con of bwnn 5,087,350 3.225,000 6.200.000 5.550,000 4,900.000 24,502.350 0 24.502.350 70
)) Other 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O A
78 Total EFpereit,os 63.071.350 93.010.000 102.538.550 109.888,900 B),I81.840 4e8,299050 16,456950 502,750.00D )e
)9 Rsewvoo O Cww-was to Next Yew 66.193,050 40,880.050 44,923.100 49,053.600 52.032.950 52.932,950 $2.145.000 52,145.000 79
80 Rqu'seE boost Swice Romves 33.270.000 38.495,000 41,085.000 47.245000 12,115.ON 61,145.000 52,145,000 52.I4500D 80
81 FurN Oelrtow 32.923.050 4.393.850 3,228.IOD 1.808500 )0).850 )8).96 0 D 01
4121193 CF 93B.XL5 10:39 AM
COUNTY SANITATION OHITRICT NO.1 THRV 14 Restated V27193
STATEMEIIT OF F ECTED CASH FLOW page 4
NSCAL MRS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002
8•Yau Tet! o-Yeer T.
LINE 199203 109156 1094-98 198696 1998-97 1992.1997 1997-2002 iOYeer TOW UK
02 SUMMARY 82
93 Wwrvw 5 C.,Over From Last Year 316.612.000 414,790.660 427.535.650 469,129.650 496.097.150 316.512,000 523.790.150 315.512.000 93
04 Tottl Revenue 351.668.000 303,830.000 381031.38D 398.899.500 371408650 1 ))3.403700 1.092150950 2,805,934,860 64
05 Total AveilaNe Fualarg 687.188,000 715,616.E50 788,58).200 854,929,180 W,N3,800 2.089.195,700 1,015,941.100 9,IB1,N6A60 86
06 Total E.,.itu,e. 252.361350 291OBt000 319.437.550 350.732.000 343))3650 1.505.400.550 1.124.813,950 2,690,019.600 N
87 Reserves 6 Carry Over to Nat Year 414,086,680 4]),835650 409.129.050 490.09).150 523.790,150 $23.790.150 491,327,150 491.327.150 87
RESERVES ANALYSIS
BB Nat Yeeir Dry Parcel Funeral Roauaammw 41,318.000 48.9)),000 53,215,000 59.882.000 67,136,000 87,136,000 92.539,000 92.839.000 as
09 Contingence,Reaerver.20%ol Opm Reins 11.696.000 12,232,600 12,494,400 14.110.200 15,])1,000 15,271,000 23.813.600 23,813,600 as
90 0.Service Reserve.seal Food Se1wes 06.193.550 40.586.660 44.923.100 49.053.600 32,932,960 52,932,950 52,143,000 52,145,000 90
91 Cattails,Removes.Share 014100.000,000 100.00D.000 100.000.000 100.000.000 Io0000.o00 100.000.000 1o0,000,000 100.000.000 100,0001000 91
92 Enwnmrntal Rag Re.,above.1110.000.000 10,000OOO 10.000,000 10,000.000 101000.000 10.000.000 10,000,ODD 10.000'000 10,0oGoo0 92
93 Insuwca Flat nveal Op., .ACOI IS3.323.000 21841)60D 24),49).160 203.365.380 278,450,200 276460200 MAMBO 212920850 93
94 Appaprie.e6 Reserves 414.786.850 427.535,660 469,129.650 496,097,150 523,700,150 523.790,160 491,32),150 481,327.150 94
95 Unrpwopi..Nwrvaa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06
96 Total Wrnvsa 414.706.850 427.535.S50 469,129,650 496,097.150 523.790,150 523,700,160 49132),150 491.327,150 90
DEBT SERVICE RATIOS
97 Sanirn 1im Cwerpe,M'mimum 1.25 5.20 3.27 3.08 4.32 4.52 5.26 97
98 Su vIdineta Use Caere,.,Minimum 1.00 3.07 1 81 1.82 1.03 1.46 1.44 98
99 A6Jiturad Bahl Test 1 Sr 6 Sub I.Minimum 1.25 2.61 2.08 1.90 1.59 1.40 1.52 99
4127/93 Page 1
RESERVES BAIANCES ANALYSIS No A...Changes Fr 93-94
PROJECTED CASH FLOWS R6Pxry Taxes Comlent At 92-93 Uval
9FASEO 4427.93
pit 199293 1993-M 1994-05 1995W96 1996w8T 1997-98 1998.99 1999,2M 200401 2001v02
DISTRICT NO 1
18 Next Yw'.Ory Period Funding Regibernants 4.176.000 5.129,000 5.272.000 5.947AW 6,730,000 71512.000 7,683.WD 8.268.WD 8,738.000 9,213,01EK,
19 Contingenry Reeervea.20%o1 Opr R9mts 1.044.000 1,074.000 1,115,WO 1.285.000 1.407.030 1.540.000 1.886,000 1,847,000 2,023.00) 2.216.00D
20 Inarmu Reserves.-OpreBng 8,053,000 4.480,000 4.227,000 3.077,000 3.455,000 3.407.000 4.02t,00M0 4.456,000 A639,000 4,584,000
79 0.M Service Reserves eed Fum exlance 9,111.550 5.554.850 5,794.00 6,068,650 8.228.000 6.228,000 6.228,000 0,226.000 6,226,000 6.226.000
45 Capita Reserves,50re e11100.000,000 9,870,050 8.070.000 0,870,000 91870,000 0.870.000 8,870.000 01870.000 9.870.000 9.870,000 9.870,000
46 FmOenmenW Rp Res,Shane of 810,M,OW 987.000 987,00D 987,000 907.000 987.000 907,000 087.000 887,000 887,000 987,000
47 he.-.. Resrves..Cepal 706.000 2.285.000 3.884,000 6.213.000 8.802.850 8.023.050 4,162.050 2.478,250 1.013,450 1219,35M
96 AppopristM patentee 32.027.650 29.375.650 31,309.650 34,047,850 37,495,650 35.665.850 34,835.050 34.152.25D 33,496.450 32,855.650
DISTRICT NO 2
18 Next Year a Dry Period Fuming Rpuiremanb 12.980.000 15.419,000 16,676,000 18.875.000 20,754,000 23.074,000 24.317.04)(1 25.676.00(1 27.181.0W 28,707."
19 Catangenry Reewves.20%of Op.lgml. 3.496.000 3.034.000 4.076.013D 4,094.000 4.748.000 5,195.000 5,687.00D 6,227,000 6,820.000 7.470.000
20 Insurance Ras.rven.Opwating 21,525,000 23.097.OW 25.380.000 25.242,000 23.007,000 19,920,000 18.131.000 18.449,000 20,804,000 23.311,000
79 Oeld Service Reserve.and Fum BYanee 19.352.650 13.105.550 13.805.000 15,156.W0 16.500.000 1e,508,000 IQ508,000 16,50AM 18,506,000 18,500.000
45 Coaxial Reserve,Shane 01100.000.00D 28,750,000 20.750.000 28.750.000 25,750,000 20.750.000 28,750,000 28,750,000 28.750.000 28,750,000 28,750,000
40 Enwrunentax Rep Re.,%we o7 S I D.WO,OW 2,875.0DO 2.875.000 2.875.000 2,875.0x) 2.875.0001 2.975.0001 2.1375,000 2.075.000 2,875.000 2.e75.000
47 lmurance Rnarvw CeptN 33.720.000 42,045.000 52.311.550 54.855.550 62,300.550 50.701.550 50,572.550 61."9.550 64.207,550 68,126.550
96 ApryOpieted Reserves 122.707.650 129.605,650 143,876.550 149.958.550 158,990,550 153.021.550 155,839.550 160,532.550 167.143.550 175.825.550
DSTRICT NO3
10 Next Yaa.Gy Pmpd Fund"Rpubrrw1. 11737,000 16.564.000 17.170,000 18.980.000 21.709,000 24.414.000 25,87S.M 27.066,000 28.586.000 30,211.00D
19 Contipmp Meme.,20%010per Rgmle 3,984,000 4.247,000 4,418.000 4,514,000 4,892,000 5,340.000 5.84e,000 0.398.001) 6,997.000 7.856.000
20 Immance Re.rverf,,trarq 27,90AMO 29,828,000 33.082,000 35.092,000 31.880.000 26,033,000 24.027.0321 21.919.000 20.356,000 19.392,000
79 Deal Samoa Reserves we Finial Samna 20,518,500 12,273.500 13,030.500 15,2050W 17,035,000 17,035,000 17.095,OW 17.035.000 17.035,000 17,035.000
45 Capital Reserve,Shane o181 W,W0.OW 31,1170.000 31,870.000 31,870,000 31,870.000 31.870.00D 31.870,000 31.070,000 31,870.000 31,870,000 31.870,000
40 Environmental Rate Iles,S6ere 0110.000.0410 3.187.000 3.187,000 3,187,000 3.187.000 3.197,0011 3.187.000 3,187,000 3,187,000 3,187.000 3.107,000
47 Inwrance Reesrv.4-CNiIN 18,805,000 25.692.OW 33.544000 36241.500 41,074,SW 31.810.500 28.088.500 24.608,50D 21.189,500 17.880,50D
88 A,,w,w ltl Mwvx 119,987.501) 123,881,5W 137.619.500 145,159,500 M.735.500 140.207.500 135.731.SW 132,WB.500 129.220.500 127,220.500
CF 938 2.%LS 11:12 AM
4127M3 Poo0 2
RESERVES BALANCES ANALYSIS NO Are CNnges Fr 93�94
PROJECTED CASH FLOWS PrOpeM Toes Cenrnt At 92.93 LWW
REVWED427-93
FM 19B 43 1993.94 199495 1995.90 1988.9) 1997-99 MW99 19W2000
DISTRICT NO 5
IB Not Yer's Dry PriW Funding Rpuiremente 2.072.000 2.370.000 2.525.000 2.838.000 3,111,000 3.398.000 3.542,000 3,886.000 3.808.000 4,o49.0130
19 Cen6manw Reserves.20%o1 OW R4". 400.000 476,000 510.000 558.000 607.000 659,04DO 710,000 )T,OW 845,000 919,000
M Moumce Resnver Ogren, 9,414,0W 10,490.000 11.510.004) 11,914.000 11.N9,000 11,574,O4H) 11,212.00o 10.OSdOW 9,939.000 0.953.000
79 Not Service Reaervee and Fund BAexs 3.808.000 I,800.000 2,031.000 2,200,000 t381,OW 2,381.OW 2.381,000 2.381.000 2.381,000 2.381,000
45 Genial Reeerree.Sore al$100.000.000 4,440A00 4.440.000 4.440.00D 4.H0.000 4.N0.000 4.440.000 4.440.OW 4."0.O00 4.MO.OW 4,440,000
40 Enrbonondol A,Ree,Some Ot 110.000.000 4 .Ooo 444,OW 444,000 444,000 444.0W 444.0W 4,14,000 4441000 4 .oc0 444.000
47 Insurance Reenrs -Capitl 4.9)B.OW 5.]90.OW ).041.OW 8.680.WD 10.280.OW 9,]OB4OW 9.51).OW ),892.OW 5,091,W0 5,933,OW
80 Appepired Romovet 25,720,000 W.410.000 2B.W7.O0G 31,981,000 33.182AW 3MM.000 31,252,000 30.117.000 28,748,000 27.119,000
PSTWCT NO 0
IB Nest Yesi a Dry Penal Funding Rgwemenla 2.011.000 2.192,MO 2,533,000 3,171,000 3,527,000 SAM.= 4.106.000 4,407.000 4,955.000 4,915.000
19 COntingenc,Reeennos.20%41 Open Root, 507.000 584,000 no.OW 700.000 )S).OW 840.O0D 920,000 1.006.000 1.105,000 1.211,000
20 inunrge Rasvves—Operating 0,062.000 7,n0.OW 8,121,000 7,920,5W 7.023.500 7.304.500 7.150.SW 7,400.500 7.9M,5W 8.725,500
79 0.1 Service Reserves end Fund Mount ;980,600 1,505,600 2.2N.800 2.199.600 2.474.eW 2.400,000 2.40D.OW 2.4(NO.6W 2A00.000 2A00.000
45 C Wtd Reserves,%do.o1 S 100.000,000 6.470,OD0 5,470.000 5,470,000 5.470,000 5,470,000 5.470.000 5,470,000 5,470,000 5,470.W0 5.4M,000
46 FnNrrmMtal Roc;Rums,Stuart of 110,000.000 547.04M 547,000 547.000 547.000 547.000 547.001) 547.000 547.000 547,OOU 547.000
Q honor. Weerver-Cepitel I016.0001 217,000 1,096,000 2.140,000 3,3M.000 1092.4001 12.010.4001 16.001,4001 0.434,4004 19.173.4001
90 AppWWW Reserves 1).02).000 18,105.60) 20530,000 22.I5S.100 23.943.100 19.754,100 0.971,100 10.IA.1W 14.053,100 13,495,100
DISTRICT NO)
IB Not,Y..Dry Prod Funding RadwemM. 3.407.000 3.843.000 4.866,0430 5.344,OW O.M.000 6,90e,000 7.124,000 7,401.OW 7.835,W0 8.231.StV
19 Contingent,Resrvee.20%ol Open Rpmta 997.00M) 1.039.000 1.208.O00 1,224,000 1,327.000 1.480,O00 1.SBB.OW 1.701.OW 1,848,000 2.00B.WO
20 Ineuranu Renrve6 Operating 14.O67.000 10,948.O4)(t 17,403.000 18.303.000 17.624.W0 15.825,000 14,849,OW 13,450.000 12.089.000 10.800.000
79 OWt Snrice Remvo end Fund BY-not 1,900,350 3.459.350 4.101.350 5.130.350 4.983.350 4,170,000 4,170.000 4,170,000 4,170,00D 4.170.W0
45 Cepitd Rewv.,SNre 01 SI W,000.OW 7.130,000 7.130,000 7.130.000 7.1W,OW 7.13D. M 7,130.000 7.130.000 7,1W,OW 7.130.000 ),I 30,000
40 Environmental Roo Roe,SNre M$10.O00.000 713,000 713,000 713,O00 7I3,OW 713.000 713.000 713.000 713,OW 713,O00 713,000
47 Insurance 11esnver<ep0d 17.219.000 19.526,000 22.315.00D 25.400.O0D 29.W4,W0 IS.BN,380 24J02.]SO ]9.893,350 33.398,350 23.350.360
85 Apprepnrtl Ron.. 45.493.350 52.761.350 07.M8.350 63.310.350 55.913.3W 62.274.3W 00.314,3W 58,517.350 57.183,350 58.410.3W
Cf 9]B t.Rls_11:13 AM
4/27193 Pete 3
KSME9 BALANCES ANALYSIS No For Matrices Far,93.94
PROJECTED CASN FLOWS PralreM Tease Canelatt At 92 93 Lrei
REVISED 4-27-83
Flat 1992.93 IM-94 199495 1995.98 1996-97 1997-98 1990.99 199�9� 0m1 2114)0Ol 2MI-02
MSTMT NO II
18 Next Yew's Dry PmiOd Fwdbp Rpuiremwrb 2.874.WD 3,111.OW 3,807.000 4.221.OW 4J17,000 5.337,000 5,584,000 5,884.000 5.177,000 6.504,000
18 Cateapmov ReFwn.20%of Ow Rpmis ))0.WO fasi 970.000 901,000 1,028.000 1,121.000 1.223.000 1.934.OW 1456,000 1,590.000
20 lnwuras famervr--0pwetirrp 10,580,W0 1016%.WO 8.)11.IXM 9.491,WO 9.312.OW 8.648.000 8,))4.000 9,306,000 10.224,000 11,5)).WO
78 Dole Service tnxan end FUM Bei 8.355.WO 2,804,000 3.335,000 3.W2.WO 3A27." 3.427.OW 3,427,000 3.427.OW 3.427.000 3.427.DW
45 Capittl reserves,8twe at l l W.DO0.W0 5,900.WD 5,980.WO 5.980.WO 5,981).000 5.980.WO 5.880.000 51980.WO 5.980,000 5,980,000 5,980,000
46 FnmanmentN Rea two.Sous of l l O,OW.OW 598.WD 598,000 598.OW 590.W0 590,W0 598.000 598.0W 598,OW 598.000 598.000
47 Inrrance Rnuvee CpiW 5,718,WD 7,284,D00 9.207.OW 10,357.11W 12.402.000 11.221,000 11.190,00C, 11,211,W0 11,302,OW 11,473.W0
96 A,,,, W Wurvea 34,686,000 31,258,000 33,016.000 34,630,000 37,464,OOD 36,332,OW 36.))6.000 3).)20.OW 39.164,000 41,149.WD
MSTRICT NO 13
18 Next Ysari Dr,P.rW FuMiry Rquiremmb 318.000 329.00(1 356,WO 388,OW 418,OW 453,WO 492,000 534,OW 579,000 629.000
19 Coxurpmw fNmvee.20%of Oper Ramis 127.OW 131,600 142AW 154.2W 167.4W 181.200 196.6W 213.4W 231.6W 251.80(1
20 Mewence fleservas-Opariwo 682,W0 28O.4W 96D.OW 920,BW 989,W0 1.043.8W 1,012,400 972,611r) 949AW 929AW
79 Debt Service Rrwv..eM Frmd Belurce 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
45 C Jxl Reserves SM1ms at 31 W,W0,OW 650.WD 65O,W0 650.0W BW.OW 650,OW 65D.000 65D.WD 6W,OW 650.00C) 650,fm
46 Envirmurtntel Ras tax.Some W 91 O.OW,OW 05.WD 65.00C, 65.W0 65.W0 65,00C, 65.000 65.OW BROW 651W0 65.000
47 hawsers RawrvepCasoal 7,843.WO 0.782,OW 5,777,W0 4,631,W0 3,704,OW 3,413,WD 3,425.W0 3,858,OW 4,782,OW 6.321,000
96 Appepdeted Re.ervaa 91085.W0 8.724,OW 7.851.000 0,015,WD 6.073.W0 5,800.0m 5.841.OW 8.298.00) ).25).OW 8.846.W0
DISTRICT NO 14
18 Naat Year.Dry Pawed Fundirp RK--nls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
19 COn5a9rq Rwaervas,20%0 Opw"a 256.OW 261,WO 202.000 30,000 330.OW 357.WD 386.WD 418.OW 453.000 492.000
20 1.....e Reaervewopwmirp 414,01W 591,440 650.WO 611,W0 432.WO 304I,WD 333.WO 356,000 379,000 4p4,000
79 Debt S.....Ra.mv.a mk FurW BNance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
45 Cepitel Reserves,SNre of 4lW.OW,WD 5.040.OW 5.840.OW BB40.OW 5.840.00 5,940,OW 5.84(%= 5.1140.0W 5.040,4W 5.840.00(1 5.840,000
4e Environmental Rp am.Some of 110. 0 .(S)0 584,0W W4.OW 584.00r) 584,000 5114.00C) 584,000 5B4,WO 584,000 684.000 584.000
47 Interco Raawves-Capted 3W,OW 352,OW 659.0010 699,OW 809.WO 815,DW 902.WO 992.o 985.000 I,065.000
90 Apprristr Rr-as 7.454,aW 1.028.OW 8.023.W0 8,039,OW 7,995.11C0 719041 ems.W0 0.080,W0 8.241,000 8.405,000
CF B3B 2.XL4 11:12 AM
4/27/93 Page 4
PESEPVE9 BALANCES ANALYSIS No Pab C apn For 93-94
PROJECTED C 511 FLOLVS Neparry Texas CmNmt At 93 93 Lwtl
REVISED 4�2)-93
net 109 -03 1993-94 1994- 1995.90 1888.87 1997-98 199999 19992WO 300601 2WI.02
ALL NSTMCT SUMMARY
18 Nest Year Dry Feriae Poedin9 Pwieir—re. 41,])5,000 46.077,000 53,215,000 59,563.000 67,130.000 M,081,m 78.803,000 82,981,000 117.619.004) 83,5391000
19 Centin0sery Weaves.2M of Op.,PyMe 11,095.000 12.252.600 I3A94.400 14,110.2W 16,271,000 16J21.200 18,229,000 19.921.400 21.7U.6W 33.813,600
20 9nma,w PewrvewOPtrMlp 90.703,000 ID4182.400 II1,640,608 113,1)),300 106.559.600 94,853= 00,517,000 88,007,100 87.399.900 88.603,900
79 ONo 6ervica Wwreat sel Fund St.. 86.193,650 40.880.850 44,923.100 40,053.800 62.002.950 50,145,000 52.145,000 53.146.000 53,145.000 52.145,000
45 Copilot Rwwvw.S5we 0$100,900.00D 100.000.900 100.000.000 100,000,000 t00.000.00D 100,000.000 100,000,000 100,000,000 100,000.000 IOO.00D.000 IM.MI000
40 FmirmrmnrN Pp Fe,More at 410.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10,000.W0 10,000,000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.000.000 10.0001OOD
47 lnmtnw Pwnwa.COIN 88,830.000 111.235.000 135,934.550 150.108.050 171.800.700 144,348,060 138,810.050 130,O111,250 126,274.450 124.155,550
90 Apprwdeled Petnvee 414,786.650 427.535.050 409.129,650 486.097.150 523.700,150 493,159.350 480.504,550 483.672.760 465.118,050 491,337,150
414,786,650 437,535.650 489,129.650 496.087.150 523.M,150 493,159.350 486,504,550 483.0)3]50 485,118,950 491.3]),I60
CF-93B 2.%l3 1102 AM
- A
4/27193
P909 5
RESERVES BAIANCES ANALYSIS N.R.1.Qa.9..Par 0Y04
PROJECTED CASH MCNYS ft F Tax C vrl At 92-931 W
RE41BW 47.93
R°I 1992-93 199394 1994.95 1995-90 1998.97 199798 1998.99 199� 2004),01 2MI42
PROJECTED SNGLE FAMILY USE FEES
22 1 83.24 83.24 95.00 1ISM 14000 160.00 170.00 178.00 190.00 189.00
22 2 71.52 71.52 70.00 83.00 Saco IOD.00 11000 120.00 1}0.00 M0.00
22 3 73.89 73.89 75W 80.00 8500 95.00 105w 118.00 1M.OD 138.00
22 5 90.)5 9BJ5 100.00 102.50 105.00 110.00 11500 120.00 125.00 1".00
22 8 )a4) )54) 85.00 95.00 105.00 115.00 130.00 146.0 ISOM 118A0
22 T 5D.09 So.09 50.09 52.50 55.00 57.50 80.00 82.00 87.SO 73.80
22 11 Baca 80.00 75.00 95.00 115.00 130.OD 145.00 IBOAO 175.00 ISOM
22 13 100.00 100.00 102.50 105.00 107.50 110.00 102.50 105.00 107.50 110.00
22 We,gMeE Ave )1.28 )1.29 78.18 83.19 90.6) 101.35 110.60 119.80 128.90 13837
MASTER PLAN SINGLE FAMILY USE FEES
22.2 1 100.00 100.00 MOD I25.00 MOD MCI) 175.00 1M.00 MIND 225.00
22.2 2 60.00 7500 75.OD 100.00 100.00 1M." 125.00 1M OD 150.00 180.00
22.2 3 100m 100 00 100.01) 1 MOD 1 MIND I M.00 1M.00 I M.00 200.00 200.00
22.2 5 100.00 100.00 125.00 1 M.M 1 M.00 126.0 1S0.00 I00.00 100.00 I MCI)
22.2 B 75.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 ISOM 1M.00 125.00 ISOM 175.00 1TIM
22.2 ) saw 50.00 50.00 )S.DD MOD M.00 75.00 105.00 125.00 125.00
22.2 11 150.00 175.00 I75.00 175.00 MOD 1115.00 1715.00 MOD 178.00 200.00
}}.2 13 90.00 95.00 9580 100.00 106.00 110.00 IIO.OD 115.00 12O.OD 130.00
W.19.1.0 AV. 82.97 9040 01.22 112.58 112.54 12185 14350 150.54 17002 174.49
M Faa 0 92.93 Tax..a.SaW M F.4
22.1 1 108.29 I20.00 139.93 184.03 1M.22 194.07 199.41 204.23 209.03
22.1 2 105.40 111.70 116.81 121.42 MI$ 142.00 152.59 M 31 172.03
22.1 3 111.01 112.04 116.93 121.80 131M 141.51 15"os 161.22 121.08
22.1 5 185.55 IN." 190.0 122.93 197.42 20I.A 208.47 21 I.D3 215.50
22.1 8 110.12 11880 IM." IM.42 148.34 103.25 178.18 193.12 20003
22.1 2 61.23 01.21 as." 88.02 98A5 90.90 93.24 98.09 102.92
22.1 11 IMAD 115.02 134.81 IMA4 169.26 183.99 198.)1 213.45 22017
22.1 13 100.00 102g} 104.R 1W.49 109.85 103.06 104.90 107.55 IWA6
22.1 W*SiSai A. 108.95 111.23 118.03 125.95 136.43 145.58 154.35 153.42 17246
CF 920IIA 11:12AM
4/27193 Papa 8
RESEWES BAIANOES ANALYSIS No Pete Qo19u Far 9194
F110JECTEO CASH FLVW6 Nw.PW Taxes Ceneunt At 92-93 LwH
BENSEB 4.27 93
Bet 1992=93 1993.94 19".96 1995.96 1990.97 1997.98 1998.99 198� 20 01 3W1 03
CASH FLOW MWECTEO EWA
23 1 73.990 74,W0 74.2W 74,410 74.700 n.080 75,WO 75.490 75,990 76,580
23 2 270.733 271.483 272,483 273.733 275,233 277,233 277.233 270.733 282,233 284,733
23 3 282.909 203.380 283.988 284,788 285,789 286,030 280.936 288.WB 209,238 290.389
23 5 20.904 29.954 27,029 27.129 27.254 27,404 27.4154 27,554 27,704 27.854
23 9 43,272 43.372 43.472 43,572 43.972 43.772 43,772 43.972 43,072 44,072
23 7 104,511 104,581 114,60, 104,811 105,011 105,201 105,201 1051581 10,961 106.461
23 11 51.003 51.233 51.433 51.733 52,W3 $2,433 52.433 52.808 53.103 53,558
23 13 8,740 6.940 7,140 7.440 7.740 8,140 9,140 8,840 9,240 8,940
23 Te1N 880,221 851,991 864,406 867,616 071.481 870.241 876,241 881.746 $07,521 093,580
CF 939 2.%lS 11:13 AM
4127/93 Page 7
RESERVES BALANCES ANALYSIS No Rate Ch"es Fm 83.94
PROJECTED CASH ROWS RpporN Tens Constant Al 92.93 LeW
REA9 4,27.9a
Rel 1992.93 1993m94 1994-N 1005 88 1990.17 1998&99 1909m2000 200001 2001-02
TOTAL USE FEE PROJECTIONS USING MASTER PLAN RATES AND CASH FLOW EOW
1 7,399,000 7.40Sm000 7.420.000 9.301.250 9.337.500 9.382.800 13,135.500 13.210.700 IB.IB8.000 17.226A00
2 10.243.900 2%361,225 20,436,225 27,373.300 27.523.30E 34,a04,125 34,654.12E 34,986.020 42.334.950 42.700.950
3 20,298.800 20,338.000 20,308,00E 35.598,500 35.723.60E 35.967.250 80.214.150 50,415.40E 67.647.a00 68,077,000
5 1800,40E 2695.400 3,370.525 3.381.125 3,408,750 3.425.S00 4,110.600 4,133,10E 4,15S,a00 4,874.450
6 3.245.400 4,337.200 4,3Q,200 4,367,200 4,367,200 5.471,500 5.471.500 61580.e00 7,095,100 7.712.600
7 5.225.550 5.228.050 5.233.060 71980,825 7,075.825 7.894.575 7,094.575 13,195.125 13.248,129 13.307.625
11 7.602,450 8,905,776 9,00077E 9.053.275 9.114,525 9.175.775 9.175.775 9,241.40E 9.307.025 10.711.600
13 605.600 659.300 678,300 744,000 312.700 895,400 896,40E 983,000 1,100,800 1,292,20E
Tetel 71372180 77991.750 78,893975 97.679,475 90,161,300 108]ee,625 125,551,625 132.730.800 150,892,200 156,012.025
TOTAL USE FEE PROJECTIONS UMNO CAW FLOW RATES AND U9N FLOW EWa
24 1 a.158,928 6.164,754 7.049.000 8.557.150 10A68A00 1zma.000 12.700.200 13.210.750 13.670.200 14.163.600
24 2 19.362.024 19,410,404 21.253,674 22,719.830 24.220.504 27.723,300 30,495.830 33,587,860 30,a9O.2SO 39,802.820
24 3 20,909.993 20.939,839 21.209.10E 22.763,030 24.291.960 27.259.110 30.128.400 33,130,120 30.154.750 39.202.380
24 5 2.002,952 2.407,800 2.702.900 2.780.723 2,861.670 3,014,440 3.151.400 3.30 .400 3,463.000 3.621,020
24 a 3.309,010 3,316,057 3,095.120 4.138,340 4,586,560 51033J80 5.090.360 0.301,440 7.035.020 7J12,600
24 7 5.234,95E 6.237.400 9.242,460 6.502,570 5,775,805 6.062.509 a,318,000 6,597,503 7,152,366 7.710.423
24 11 3.054,980 3.073,960 3.857,475 4.914.635 8.988.545 6.81a.290 7.602,765 9.449.290 9.307.028 10.170.020
24 13 074.000 694.00E 731,060 781,20E 832,050 896.400 834.350 007,200 993.300 1,093,400
24 Total 01.317,843 61.450.655 05,831.588 72,170.504 79,014,914 88.604,428 96.970.935 105,530.793 114,474,453 123.560.003
TOTAL USE FEE PROJECTIONS USING RATES IF 92.93 TAXES RAISED BY FEES AND CASH FLOW EOU,
1 8.020.00E 0,90400E 10.412,000 12,313.00E 13.880,00E 14,004,335 15.053.29E 15.619.580 10.003.222
2 20.815,00E 30,453,000 31,919.000 33,420,00E 30.922,00E 39,012,784 12.605,516 45.808.234 48.981,031
3 31,458,OOO 31,817,000 33,301,000 34,B10,00E 37.777,000 40.804.265 43.00 ,932 46,031,594 40.a79,259
5 5.004.00E 5,088,00E 5.177,00E 51256.000 5.410,000 5.534.705 5.989,030 5,840.340 a.004,864
6 4,778.00E 5,154,000 5.696,00E 8,040,OOD a,493,000 7.145,575 7.817,482 6,491.896 8.100.197
7 8,494.000 8.499.00D 8,780.00E 9.033.000 9.310.O0 9.563.743 9.842.703 10.393.954 10.957.245
11 5,133,00E 5,918.000 6.974.00E 8.049.000 6.675.000 9.547.005 10.483.404 11.351.950 12.220,43E
13 694 000 732.00E 701.00E 832,000 925.000 034,727 907,013 993,718 1,093.0.ID
Tatty 92.194.000 86.574.000 102.922.00E 109.700,OOO I19.547.00D 127.647.239 130.094.155 145.037.078 154,107.905
CF 93B 2.XL5 11:12 AM
4/27193 Page B
RESERVES BALANCES ANALYSIS No Bete Cbegee For 93.94
PROJECTED f SH f 0iA S Pmp.rt,Time.Conetml At 92 93 Lwd
REVISED 4 27 93
Ref 1992,93 1993*94 91 94.95 199596 1996W47 1997%98 1986-99 199920N 2N0.01 2W1-02
DEBT SEIMCE RATIOS
Minn.1
97 Seem Den Cevmo90.Mn 1.25 276 1.69 2.03 2.28 2.47 2.48 2.56 2.57 2.58 2.58
98 9ubmdinm.lim Cvverpe.Mn 1.00 1.87 1.19 1.20 1.39 1.47 1 AA 1.49 1.50 1.50 1.50
99 AiAlmon a Bo e.Tee119r 6 Sub 1.Mn 1.25 1.93 1.32 1.43 1.43 1.52 1.55 1.59 L59 1.69 1.00
Mebim 2
97 Swor Um Ceverpe.Mn 1.25 4.92 3.0 3.40 3.22 3.10 3.06 3.19 3.35 3.52 3.70
9B Submdirule Dn Cevmpe,M i 1.00 3.22 2.03 2.09 1.91 1.80 1.74 1.91 1.91 2.00 2.10
99 Additioml Bondh,Tine I S B Sub I.Min 1.25 2.95 2.16 2.12 1.85 1.73 1.75 1.87 1'95 2.04 2.14
Mvu ct 3
97 Swim Lien Coverpe.M..1.25 5.47 3.39 3.74 3.44 2.97 2.62 2.60 2.76 2.83 2.90
98 Subwdinere Den Cevope,Mt 1.00 3.22 2.00 2.02 1.82 1.55 1.36 1.39 1.43 IAT 1.50
99 AdditbnN Bend.T..,1 Sr 8 Sub I.Mn 1.25 2.58 2.07 1.97 1.70 1.55 1.46 1.49 1.52 1.56 1.60
Mon.,5
97 Swim Uen COvm.9e.Mn 1.25 5.00 3.00 3.()4 2.81 2.66 2.39 2.31 2.22 2.11 1.98
BB SuberdineU Gen C msev.Mn 1.00 3.16 2.01 1.94 1.73 1.61 1.42 1.37 1.32 1.25 1.18
99 Additional BoMRwI(Sr B SW 1.Min 1.25 2.02 2.43 1.95 1.69 1.59 1.50 1.45 1.41 1.35 1.29
Dono,6
BJ St ior Gen Coverge.Mn 1.25 8.50 10.12 6.97 4.17 3.81 3.08 3.17 3.29 3.42 3.64
98 Submdimim Wn Cevnp.,Mm 1.00 3.22 2.54 2.13 1.55 1.47 1.24 1.27 1.32 1.37 1.46
99 Additional BaMe Tee,l Sr 6 Sub 1.Min 1.25 2.64 2.60 2.19 1,55 1.50 1.37 1.41 1.44 1.49 1.55
M.rim T
87 St.lien Coverpe,Mon 1.25 9.69 7.33 5.08 4.28 3.57 3.05 3.13 3.19 3.35 3.53
9B Submdonete Lien Coverpe.Mn 1.00 4.67 3.32 2.30 1.98 1.68 IAA 1.48 1.51 1.58 1.66
99 Addilimml Bond.Tnt 1 Sr B Sub 1,Mon 1.25 5.29 3.42 2A3 1.76 1.64 1.53 1.48 1.52 1.58 1.66
DiOnot 11
87 Sow.Gen Coverge,Mn 1.25 11.15 8.70 6.23 5.30 4.71 4.02 4.26 4.52 4.00 5.08
98 Submdinete Den Coverp.,Mn 1.00 3.06 1.97 1.08 1]I 1.67 lAl 1.59 1.69 1.79 1.90
99 Additi-I SoMe Le,I Sr B Sub I.Mn 1.26 2.74 1.97 1.89 1.58 1.64 1.57 1.66 1.75 1.04 1.95
Cf 938_2XL5_I 1:12 AM
u
4127/93 Pogo 9
RESERVES BAIANCES ANALYSIS NO R.I.Ch.,..Fee 93.94
FHOJECTED CASH FLOWS PraaaM Taxes Ceo.lml A191A3 Level
MVISED 4 27 93
B'I 1992-93 1993.94 1994.99 1995.96 1990.97 107,90 1999s9 j888.mo MOMDI 2001 02
DI.".l 13
97 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 DOD 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
90 DEBT SERVICE FATIOS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.Oo 0.00 0.00 O.DD 0.00 DOC
99 Seaim Um C...'. NDIVIO1 Normal IDIV/01 IDIVl01 mviol ND W01 INVIDI IDIVI01 IDIVI01 IDIVIOI
mill
97 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
99 DEBT SERVICE RATIOS O.D0 OAO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.DO 0.00 0.00 0.00
99 Sera lien Cevwp. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CF 930 9.%L6 11:12 AM
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT W.1 Renard 4127193
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Retina A9exy Row..Ien.
FISCAL YEARS 1962-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 Prep To..COmtent At 92 93 Level
No Fee Change 93-94
BerrpwlnB In 96�97
NO COP In 20%Conrin9errcy
1992.1997 1967-2002
LINE 188283 188384 1984-98 188B 9B 1B95-97 B.Y.,Total B.Yesr Total 10-Yell Total LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
I
2 Roeawe A Cory-0var Fran Leer year 8125.000 11.273.000 10.999,OW 10.679 000 10 WB 000 9.125.000 11 WO WO 9126 OW 2
J REVENUE
a
4 Shen of l%Tea Alb-lien 1.85610D0 1.085.OW I.855,000 1.855,000 1,955,000 9.276.000 9,275.000 1111.1150.000 4
5 Foes:lnMnRlel Waste 400.O00 460.000 629,00D EOB.000 699,Wo 2.090,000 6,425,000 11.121.0011, B
B Uesr Few 6,159,000 6.iII 7.048.000 9.557.000 10.468.WD 39,399,000 00.204.000 104,992,000 B
Interest a Miewlleteern Inerae I.158,000 763,000 740.000 762,000 708.000 4,204.000 4,966.OW 9.090.000 )
8 Treater farm COP Fund, 920,000 440,000 340.000 356.00"0 369.000 2,1281000 1,670.WO 3,096.000 8
9 gate Rxrnw 307,000 0 0 0 0 307,000 0 307,000 8
10 TOTAL REVENUE 10409.000 9,668,00D 10.519,000 12.120000 14.188 W0 68996.000 87500.000 144658000 10
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 19,624,000 2098800D 21.211100D 22.802.000 26.075000 66120,000 69.260O00 153J8D.W0 11
12 EXPENDITURES 12
13 Stares of Jelnl Woke M A 0 4.572.000 4,718.000 6,1e1.000 5,710,O01) 6,281.000 26,473.O011 42,181.000 611.451 13
14 Collection SWarm M A O and Other Oper. 650,000 650.000 583.000 )1).00O 763,000 3.463,000 4.375,000 7,028.000 14
15 COP Sorolw 3 12B 000 4.888.000 4 B)0.000 b 469 WO 6 441 000 24 694 W D 38]11 000 81,305,000 16
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,351.000 10.257,000 10.644,000 11,e93O041, 13478000 64.520000 e8267O00 1377117000 19
17 Reswes A Carry-Owr to Neat year 11,273,O00 10.699.000 10,074.O430 10.809,000 11,000,000 11,600,000 19,993,OW 15,993,OW 17
18 Hart Yuis Dry Period Ponding ReeullemeMe 4,176.000 5,129,000 5.272,000 5,947.000 6.738.000 6.738,000 8,213.000 9,213.000 18
19 20%Cenlin9ewy We anal COP..,I.N 1,044.000 1,074000 108000 1,265.000 1A0).000 1.40],000 3.216.OW 22100W IB
20 Portion of lneurenw Aid.6urplue rr lDe114111 B.OSJ.000 4.498000 422]000 3.B]].000 3455,000 34650W 4664000 4b640W W
21 USER FEE DATA 21
22 &1 Ford,Residene6 Wet Fee $03.24 $83.24 $95,00 $115.00 $140.00 I105.00 22
22.1 SIR Fee If 92.93 bees Federal By Fee 0108.29 6120,00 $139.93 $104.03 $209.03 22.1
22.2 SFR Fee From 20W Vilon Mesterplen 1100.00 0100.00 1100.00 $125.00 4125.00 $225.00 22.2
23 Player,of E4ul—khrt Dwe111n9 Unlre 73,990 74,060 74.200 74,410 ]4,]00 ]).200 23
24 Eellmeled War Fax 46,159,000 /8.185,000 17.049,WO $8,557,000 $10,458,000 $14,282,000 24
F..NAXU4.n=l- Wee1-Pnea
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 R—i-d 4127M
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW P.B.2
FISCAL YEARS 1 BB2.19B3 THROUGH MI-2002
1992 1997 1997-2002
LINE 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995416 1990-97 5-Yean Totel 5-Veer Telel 10Nwn Toth LINE
25 CAPITAL FUNDISI 26
26 Nemec B Con,<var Fran Lam Y., 10,440,000 11.5,13.000 13.122,000 14,841 000 17.070.000 10.440,000 19.659,650 10,440,000 26
27 REVENUE 27
20 CensSuotlen Glen. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
28 few: Connocton 105.000 329.000 51910" 761p00 978.000 2.743,000 B.OBO= 11.823.000 28
30 Indu.IIW WaetB 125.000 131.000 138,000 145.000 1511DOo 691.000 111 1.574.000 30
31 User Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
32 Swo of Capadty Fights I30,000 141.000 71,000 202.000 280.000 824.000 221,000 1,045.000 32
33 Ann aaeRon Feee 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 33
34 Intenet A MHoallemew In.One 783.000 878,000 991.000 1.131.000 1,302.000 5.085.000 5.122.000 10.207,0D0 34
35 Traneler Pro—d.lion COP Fund 6.019,000 ).36).000 8.310,000 10,176,ODD 9,342,850 43,204,654 0 43,204,650 35
36 Oth.,Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36
37 TOTAL REVENUE 8,222.000 8836000 10.029.000 12.4050DD 12056650 52647,050 15,308000 57963,650 37
38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 18062.000 20.479,000 23,151.000 27,248,000 29125050 02.987.650 34865650 70293650 38
39 E%PENDTTURES 39
40 SMn 41 Joint W.A.Treeonont Plent 5.9581000 6.954,000 8.186.000 9,921000 8.861.000 39.669.000 18.108.000 50.039.000 40
41 M.1no,CD11e6en BYetem 1.0001000 403,004 126,000 255,000 615.000 21386.000 6.158.000 0,557.000 41
42 Otiv1 1.001,00D 0 0 0 0 1.061.001) 0 1.001.000 42
43 TOTAL E%PENMTURES 8,019.000 ),35).000 8,310.000 10.176.000 9468000 43328000 24328000 57658000 43
44 Cepitel S EnAvonnental Rep Room— 11,633,000 13.122,000 14,841.000 17.070.000 19.659.650 19.859.050 10,837.060 10.637.650 44
45 Shire of 100.000.000 Capitol Rftrve 9.870,000 9.8701000 9.870,000 9.070.000 9,070,000 9,970,000 8.070,000 9,8]O,000 45
40 SMre of a10,000.000 Eron on Room— 86),000 90]000 9B).DDD 98],000 BB) 0 OO 9B). D BB),000 907.000 46
47 Portion of to unnco Rxene 786 000 2 295 000 3 984 000 0213000 a 802 SS,000 8 802 650 219 E.
219 360 47
48 61n9Ie Femlly Reticle.Con tionFee 02,350 $2.350 $2,470 $2,590 02.720 03,480 48
49 Nunler of New EWIvMent Dwellln9 U.I. ]O 140 210 290 360 700 49
50 Eetineted Connection Foo lno9ne 1165.000 0329.000 0519.000 $751,000 0878,000 02.435.000 50
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.1 R.vived 4137I93
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pao.3
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001.2002
1992-1997 1997-2002
UNE 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-98 1996-87 5-Yoor Total 5.Yoor Tool 1PYoor Total LINE
61 BOND FUNd31 51
52 Rwrvw B CNW-Uwr Fmm Loot Ywr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52
53 REVENUE 63
54 Too Levy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54
55 Inbrwt&Mi.oalwwwwo 1.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55
56 dBoo I.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51
67 TOTAL REVENUE 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 57
58 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 O O O 0 0 O 58
68 EXPENDITURES 59
80 Bang,Portman,a Inmea, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60
BI Trenete,to Capital Fedlillw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 61
82 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02
e3 Rwervw&Cpny-Over to Naot Ywr 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 63
84 11a.1 Ye m a On,Period Fundln0 Rwulramwle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64
05 Frr.d Saw—er ID.0ei0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 as
65 COP FUNDS ee
67 flow—&C.,,—,From Leal Year 5,040.000 9.111.050 5,554,650 5.794,650 810681650 5,040000 9.228.000 5.040,000 67
&B REVENUE 99
B9 New Borrowing 12,]2],000 4,000,000 9.ODG000 I l'oW.000 10,000,000 46,727,000 0 40.727.000 69
70 Inlarwt&Oth.r, 820,000 440.002 J40,000 358,002 389,"1 2,125,000 1,970,000 8995.000 70
71 Total Raranue 1934).000 4,440.000 9.340,000 11.358,000 to,
o 389.000 40,832.000 1e)0.000 50.722.000 71
72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 18.397,000 13.661.050 14894.650 17,150,650 18.437,050 53892,000 8.096.000 $6.782.000 72
73 EXPENDITURES 73
74 Pat!.Coal Dawn.to Capitol Faollitiw Fund 8.019,000 ),35).000 0.310.000 10.176,000 9,342.650 43,204A50 0 43,204.650 74
75 Interest Earned Twundw.to Opwanin9 Fwd 620,000 440,000 340.000 356,000 369,000 2.125.000 1.870,000 3,995.000 75
78 Color.11.... 636.350 200,000 460,000 550,000 500,000 2.338,350 0 2.338.360 76
]) DIM, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ]]
78 Total Expw8lurae 0.275 360 7,887.000 8.100.000 11,082 000 10,211,650 47.566.000 1.8)0.000 49.536.000 78
79 Narrow.&Corry.—m Nwil Year 911111860 6.664.00 5,704,650 8.0891650 8,228,000 6,226.000 6.226,000 6.226.000 79
80 ReaWred Dahl Bonn.R.... 4.526.000 4728.000 5.178.000 5,720,000 8.220.000 6.226.000 6.226.000 6,226,000 80
81 Fund Bal.no. 4 BBfi 880 B20 B50 818 B50 342.650 0 0 0 0 111
of Ml ma..
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 1 Revi,eE 4127193
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW P.,4
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
1992-1997 1997 2002
LINE 1992-93 1993-94 1994.95 199546 1998-97 5 Year Total 5-Y9er Total 10-Year Tolel LINE
82 SUMMARY 82
93 Roxorvns&Carry Me,Frem Leal Yee, 24,005,000 32.027,050 29,375.650 31.309,850 34,047,850 24,005,OOo 37.405,550 24.005,000 83
84 Total Revenue 33,069,000 22959000 298111000 358419000 39,590.650 150.394,850 104838000 2832301150 84
85 Total Available Funding 57.673.000 54,986.650 $9.203,050 07.198.550 70,638.300 162.999,650 142.321.050 207.035,050 85
06 Tend Expenlllu,x 25.845.350 25.611.000 27.954.000 33.151.000 33 152,650 145,514 000 10B 466.000 254.979 000 Be
87 Reserves&Car,Over to Next Your 32,027.850 29 376.050 31.309.650 34.047.650 37,485,650 37.485,650 32 856.650 32,858 650 87
RESERVES ANALYSIS
88 Next Yaeie On,Period Funding Refulrentand. 4,1141,000 5,129,000 5,272,000 5,947.000 6.738,000 8.738.000
2163,0000 9.230" 88
1.40].00 00 .00Be Cwtnwney flerorv .20%of Op.,Reeml 1.041,000 1.074,000 1,1)6.000 1,28fi,000 tp0],000 . 89
90 Debt Service Haeerves and Fund Belanw 9.111.650 5.554,850 5.794.650 61060.660 0.22a.000 8,226.000 6,225.000 6.226,000 90
91 Copled Nxarvx.Slam of a100,000.000 9.870.000 9,870,000 9.870.000 9187IL000 9,870,000 9,070,000 9,8>0,000 9.870,000 B1
92 EnvironmenMl Rae Rm.Sinew of 410,000,000 967.000 987.000 987.000 907.000 987.000 987.000 98).000 987.000 92
93 Inwrenw Remax. e,039.000 0,761.000 8,211,000 9,890,000 12 257,850 12,257.060 4.344,850 4,344 850 93
94 Total Appropriated Rxervx 32.027.850 29,375.e50 31.309,650 34,047,850 37,485.650 37.406,1150 32,050,650 32,858,850 94
95 Un.ppmp,laled Re.ervx 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 95
96 Total Rxarve. 32,02].650 28,37S 650 31309650 34047650 37,485.B50 37485p50 32.655,650 1 32858650 90
DEBT SERVICE RATIOS
97 SwJor Lion Coverage.Min 1.25 2.76 159 2.03 2.28 2.47 2.58 97
98 Suber®nets Lien Cover...Min 1.00 1.87 1.19 1.29 1.39 1.47 1.50 9B
99 Additional Senate Tee'I S,&Sub 1.Min 1.25 1.93 1.32 1.43 1.43 1.52 1.60 99
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 Raviad 4127M80
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW fretin9 Afenvy Differentia-
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROOOH 2O01-2D02 prop Talmo Cemdnt At 92-93 Laved
No Fes Chengere For 93.94
No COP In 20%Contin9ercy
Eatimeted 5-Yeer Total 5-Y..,TOIN
LINE 1992.93 1993.94 1994-05 199696 199697 1992-1997 1997Q002 10-Yeer Total LINE
I OPERATING FUND 1
2 Reserves 5 terry-Over Frem Lest Year 28.808,000 38.001.000 42.150.000 46.134.000 48.311.000 26 0011000 40.507.000 20.809,000 2
3 REVENUE 3
4 Share of l%Tax Allocation 9,199,000 911991000 9.199.000 9.198.000 91199,000 45.995.000 45.996,000 91,990,000 4
5 Fa-:1ndu.rrie1 Was. 2.250,000 2.588,000 2.971L000 3,422.000 3.935.000 15.171.000 30,512.000 45.683.000 5
6 Use,F... 19.303,000 19.418.000 21.254.000 22,720.000 24.221,000 106.974,000 169,590,000 279,5a4,000 0
] Inters..O M...Iran..-income 4,213,000 2,807,000 3.101.000 3,317,000 3.390,000 16.830,000 10.082.000 34.918,WO ]
B Threats,/ram COP Fund. 921,000 870.000 610.000 BB0.000 950.000 4.426,000 4,850,000 9,376,000 of
9 Or.,Revenue 1307,000 0 0 0 0 1,307,000 0 1.307.000 9
10 TOTAL REVENUE 37,153.000 3419881000 37.340,000 39.527.000 41.703.000 IM.M9.000 289129.000 459.636,000 10
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 03.951.000 72.987,000 79,490.000 05.661.000 90.014,000 217517.000 317.636.000 486,040.000 11
12 EXPENDITURES 12
13 Share of blot Woke M e 0 15.381.000 15.974.000 17.401.000 19,M>,000 21.126.000 89.051.000 141,8110.000 230,940,000 13
14 Castration Syerem M 6 O and OINar 0esr. 2.099.000 2.295.000 2,919.000 2.765.000 2.803,000 12,981,000 151105.000 27,786,000 14
15 COP SoMet 84110.000 13889000 12970000 15378.000 1)J)9DOD W.2)8000 101 OJ40DD 168352000 15
16 TOTAL EXPMOTUMS 25.950.000 30.837000 33.366.000 37360000 41.607.000 169010000 258088000 427,078,000 16
17 R-arvas a Corry-Guar to Near Yaer 39.001.000 42.150.000 48.134.000 49,311,000 49,607.000 48.507A00 59.568.000 59.658.000 17
18 Wet Yens Dry peeled Funding W4Wmr-nu 12.90.000 16.419.000 16,678.000 18,675.000 M.nei.000 20.754,000 28,707.000 28.787.000 is
19 20%ContlnpurfY R»(.1 COP urfulfe) 3 W 000 3,034,000 4,076,000 4,394,000 4 J4B 000 4.J46.000 J 4)0000 ]4]0 D00 19
10 laenlen el I-urance Nee,Surplus or Gotkitl 1 000 23 OW Ooo 26 3110000 28 242 000 23 00>Oo0 2300]000 23 311.000 23.it I,WO 20
21 USER FEE DATA 21
22 Hindle Pemily Roidfne.War Fee 071.52 071.52 078.00 I93.00 088.00 1140.0D 22
22.1 SFR Fort If 02.93 Term Are Raised by Foe 11105.40 0111.76 $1111.61 4121.42 0172.03 22.1
22.2 Not Fare From M20 Vision Meeterpintn 100.00 O75.00 O76.00 $roo 0 0100.00 1150.00 22.2
23 Nianbar,of Eoul-lase Dwelling UNte 270.793 271,403 272.483 273.733 275.233 287.233 23
24 b9meted User Fen 918,363,000 $19.410.000 #21.254.000 122.7M.000 $24,221,000 140,212,6M 24
Ci}we.M1E�.N]Ip�MO M vqe]
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 Review!4127193
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 2
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002
5-Year Total S.Ywr Total
LINE 1992.93 1993.84 1994-85 1995-90 188E-8T 19924887 1997$002 10-Year Tmel LINE
25 CAPITAL FUNDI51 25
26 Rwerwe&Carry-over From Last Year 57.204.000 65,354.000 74.270.000 83.936.550 86,491.550 57,704.000 93.985.550 57.704AOO 26
27 REVENUE 27
28 C......der,Grants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
29 Feee: Conversion 1.7113,000 2.350,000 3,088,000 3,885,000 5,4tO.000 16.526.000 39,500,000 55,026,000 29
30 Induselal Wen,. 1.1501000 1,208.000 1.268, 0 1,331.000 11398,00. 6,355.000 8.110,000 14,4M.000 30
31 We,Fee. O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
32 Sale of Capacity Many 325.000 409.000 205,000 586,000 911.000 2.386.000 040.000 3,026.000 32
33 Annaeelion Few 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 33
34 Interest&Mi...Iran...lncrme 4,302.000 4,949,000 5,008.000 6.041.000 0,397.000 27.357.000 32.007,000 60.244,000 34
36 Transfer Proceeds from COP Fund 20,273.000 22,317,000 25,029.550 24,300,000 24.300.MO 1la,219,550 0 118,219.550 35
36 Other Rwanve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36
37 TOTAL REVENUE 27.923.000 31233 36190.550 341 38"iI 1611849550 01.137.000 249.900.550 37
38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 85.627.000 98.587,000 109.488.550 120.079.550 124.837.560 228647.550 175,122.550 302,B84,550 b
39 EXPENDITURES 39
40 6Bue at foim Wehe Trainman,Nett 17.268,000 20,165.000 23.722,000 28,753,000 25.652.000 115,650.000 52.063,000 168.213.000 40
41 Eastern Collection System 3.000.000 2.152.000 1.010.000 4,836.00[1 5.200.000 1),00).000 22.708.000 39.715,000 41
42 Ome, 5,000 O O O 0 5.000 0 5.000 42
43 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 20.279.000 22.317.000 25.632000 33.588.000 30052,000 132562.000 75,371,000 207.933.000 43
44 Carried&Ewinm--el Peq Rwervp 65.354A00 74,270.000 03.936,550 06,491.550 93,905.550 83,985,550 99.751,550 99.0,51.550 44
45 Sierra of 100.000.000 Costal Reserve 29,775O000 28,750.000 2e.250.000 28,750.000 28.250.000 28.760.000 26,760,000 20,750.000 45
46 Shea of 110.000,000 Erwiron Reserve 2,875.000 2,875,000 2.11 2.876.000 2,8]5,000 2.B]5,000 2,8]5 000 2,83,000 46
47 Portion of I.Is ee Far.Sursw or IDe6a111 33,729,000 42,645,000 51 311.550 54 066,550 82.360.550 BR,3B0 550 88,120,550 89.128.550 47
48 Sinpla Family Roadway Connombn Fee $2.350 $2.350 $2.470 $2.590 112,720 13,480 48
49 Number 4f New E4svorest DWMIin9 Units 700 1,000 1.250 11500 2AO0 2.500 49
60 Eeimaled Connection Fare Income 11,763,000 42,350.000 /3,Oee.000 $3.895,000 151440. 0 111,700,000 50
ro� we0r, no.
COUNry SAMrAT1ON DISTRICT NO.2 Rwlsed 4mre3
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Fear 3
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
5.Yea,Total 5-Yea,Total
LINE 1992-93 1993-94 199495 1995-96 1995-97 1992.1997 1997-2002 10-YxrTolel LINE
51 BOND FUNDISI 51
52 Ream as&Carry-Owr From Look Year O O 0 0 O O 0 0 52
53 REVENUE 53
54 Tax Larry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54
55 Interest&Miccalleneeue Imen. 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O 55
56 Other In. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58
57 TOTAL REVENUE 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 57
5& TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 58
59 EXPENDITURES 59
80 Bend Principal&Inbound 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 SO
81 Traealer to Cepltal Froietaa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61
82 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82
63 R..&Ceny-Cver t0 Neat Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63
64 Next Yeai s My Period Fundln9 RorlulremenU O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 54
65 Fund Balance or IOelicltl O 0 O 0 O O O 0 B5
86 COPFUNDS 88
57 Reaervr&Cmry over From Leet Yee. 8,020,000 19.352,550 13185 550 13 8011080 15.158,000 9,020,000 1B,SOB,CO0 91020,000 BT
68 REVENUE 89
89 New Borrowing 33.269.000 17,000,000 27.000,000 27.000,000 27,000,000 131,269.000 0 131.261.000 69
TO Inures,&Or", 821,000 976,000 010.000 869.000 950,000 4,429.000 4.950.000 9.376.000 70
Tl Tend l Revenue 341090,000 17,978,000 27,810.000 27.859000 27,950,000 135,895,000 4.960.000 140,645,000 Tl
72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 42.110,000 37.328,550 40.995550 41675.000 43.106,000 143.715,000 21458000 149665000 72
93 EXPENDITURES 30.852,000 73
74 Project Coal ransient to t Fiul Facilities FUM 20.273,000 22.317,000 25.029,650 24,300,000 24,300,000 110.219,550 0 116,211,550 74
75 Inlerom Earned Transfers b Operating Fund 821.000 976.000 810,000 869,000 950.000 4.426.000 4.980.000 9.370.000 75
ro Coate of Imarenee 1,663.450 850.000 1,350,000 1.350.000 1.350,000 6.563.450 0 0,563,450 78
71 Other 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 TT
TB Total Eapsnditurea 22,757.450 24.143.000 27.189,550 28,519.000 26.600.000 127.209.000 4.950.000 132,159,000 38
79 lleserv®&Cenyrovor to Nest Y., 19,352.550 13.105.550 13,806,000 15,156.000 18,506,000 18.500.000 18,508,000 IB-508,000 79
80 Repaired Debt Service Feaervea 11,609,000 12.456,000 13.808,000 15,156.000 16.506,000 IB,506,000 18.506,000 18,508.000 80
81 Fund Balance 7,746.550 729.550 0 0 0 0 0 0 81
as.N-x„.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.2 Randall 427193
STATEMENT OF PRCL ECTE0 CASH FLOW Is .s 4
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 TNROUON 2001-2002
5.Year Teal 5-Year Teal
LINE 1992.93 1993-94 1994.95 1995.90 1996.97 1992.1997 1997-2002 1O.Year Teal LINE
82 SUMMARY 82
83 Roperves S Carry-Oven From lead Year 92,532.000 122.TI7.550 129,005.550 143.878,550 149,950,550 92,532,000 158.908.550 92.532,000 93
04 Total prevented 991all 04.195.000 100,349,550 103.539.006 107998000 496247.550 366219000 960.463650 84
B5 Total Available Funding 191.098,000 206,902,550 229,954.100 247,415.550 257,957,550 507,))9.550 514,214,550 942,995.550 as
86 Tour Expenditures 6S.990.460 77.297000 86.0)7.550 9),457,000 99.999.000 420.781.000 330.389.000 )67.1)0,000 86
97 Reserves S Carry-Over or Next Year 122.707,550 129,605.550 143,070,650 149,958.550 150.998.560 1 156.998.550 175,825.550 1 175.825,550 97
RESERVES ANALYSIS
88 Next Year'.01,Period Funding Raduimmenu 12,980.000 15,419,000 10,678.000 I91675.000 ".754.000 ".754.000 29J8).000 26J8).000 BS
89 Cen11ngeney Reserved,20%el Oper Rome 3.490.000 3,634.000 4,07e,000 4,384,660 4.746.000 4.746.000 ],4]Bp00 J,4)0,800 e9
90 Debt Berman Res—so and Fund Balenve 19,352.550 13.IB8.650 13,6061000 15.158.000 18.506,000 16.606.000 16.506.000 16,500,000 90
91 Cartel Reaarvo,Bbera of 0100,000.000 20.750.000 20.750.000 2B.760,000 28,760,000 20.750,000 28.750.000 29,]60,000 28.)60.900 91
82 Envlrenmenal nee Rea,Sbara of 110,000,000 2.8)6,000 2,8]6,000 2,0]5.000 2,075,000 2.875.000 2.976.000 2.BJ5.000 2.8)6,000 93
93 Introduce Reserves 56.254,000 $5.742.000 77,591,1160 W,109,550 85.307.550 n.397.550 91.437.650 91.437.650 93
94 Total Appropriated Reaexas 122,707,650 129,a05,550 143,876.550 149.958.550 150.998,560 159,898.550 LJ8,825,850 1J8.935.550 94
95 Unppreprleted Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95
88 Tend neaarvad 122,707,560 129,606,550 143,876,550 149,950,660 16B 89it 168 988 560 1]6 826 669 1]6 B2fi fi60 98
DEBT SERVICE RATIOS
97 Senior Lis r Leverage,Min 1.25 4.02 3.05 3.40 3.22 3.10 3.70 97
96 Subordinate Lien Coverage,Min 1.00 3.22 2.03 2.09 1.91 1 90 2.10 99
9B Addltlonn Bonds Year I Sr 8 Sub),Min 1.25 2.B6 2.16 2.12 1.B5 1 73 2.14 99
- rtlPoB.rB u1_M1prl
CW SANITATION DISTRICT NO,3 8wind4-27-93
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pacing Agency 6ranaione
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002 Prop Taxes Constant at 92-93 Leval
No Fee Clung-Fer 92.93
No COP in 20%Continigenog
Bernwing in 96.92
bees-! 5-Year Tonal 5-Year Total
LINE 1992-93 1993-94 1994-H 1995-96 1995-97 1992-199T 1997-2002 IOXcar Total LINE
1 OPERATING FUND
1
2 Reeerv-B CelrpOval From last You 34441N W 45,807.000 501639.OW S5.Ne.0 56578,000 34,µ8.000 50,569.OW 34,µe.000 2
3 REVENUE 3
4 S,em of l%Tax Allocation 10.518.000 10.5191000 101510.000 10.518.000 10,518.OW 52.590,000 52.590,O01) 10511SO,OW 4
5 Feee:Inewtriel Waste 1,900,0W 2.185.000 2,513,000 2,990.000 3.324,000 12.912.01M 25,772.000 38,584.000 5
8 Vice,Fe- 20.010.01)0 30.940.000 21,299.000 22.703.000 24.292,001) 110,224,00 I641,427,00O 276,051.000 8
2 Iner-tS bSe-Ila—om ln-r— 4,055.O04) 3.532,000 3,890,000 4.199.OW 4,307,000 19.991.000 20.674.000 4g8551000 T
e Lwfer fern COP F—d. SW.OW 984.BW 777.000 887.000 920.0W 4.104.000 5.110.000 9,214.OW 9
9 Other Re-rna 2µ,OW 0 0 0 0 744O01) 0 7µ,W0 9
10 TOTAL REVENUE 38033.000 38,159.000 39,005.000 41.247.000 43411.000 M.455,400 270523OW 471,028.000 10
I TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 73.081.OW 93A811,O4)(11 891e4,14.OW 96.535.O00 101987.000 234.903.000 30111,142.000 505.476,OW 11
12 EXPENDTURES 12
13 SMre Of imm Wohs M 80 15,386.000 15,079.O1M 17,467,000 19,214,W0 21,135.000 89,0e1.000 141.936.000 231,017,000 13
14 Colmotion Scat—M B O end pincer Oyer. 4.435,000 5.357.O00 4.025,W0 3,358.000 3,324,000 21.097,000 19.265,1000 40,382.000 14
15 COP Servi— 7.053.000 Mimi 12.264,000 15.389.000 19.959.O01) 88,156.000 110.062.O40D 178910.000 15
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 22.424.OW 33.127.000 34,350.W0 37,959.OW 43.410,000 178.334.000 221.1111113.OW 44a.212.000 Is
17 Rwrv-B Cnry Over to Nett Yaer 45.5417.000 W,839.O00 55.288,000 58,57111,000 58.589.0W 58.569.000 57.259,OW 67.259.000 lT
18 Newt Yasls Co,Perisd Fulling ReWiremenx 13.702.OW 18.584.000 17.128.000 19.9W.000 21.70111.001) 21.709.W0 30.211.000 W,211.OW 18
19 20%C—fing—eyR-Iasd COP-rvi-1 3.984,000 4,247,0W 4,418.000 4.514.W0 4,892 4092,000 T.858,000 2850,000 19
20 Poreon of lmeanw Re,SurpN.or lDe0ci0 2T.908.OW 29.8200W 33.0920W 35,082.W0 31,9118.000 31.988.W0 19.392.000 19.392= 20
21 USER FEE DATA
31
22 Single Ferns,R-i00-e Usat F— 073.89 073.89 4T5.00 $80.00 185.00 6135.00 22
22.1 SFR Fee H 92-93 Tat-An Reid by F— $111.01 $112.04 6116.93 1121 80 81 T1.00 22.1
22.2 SFR Fee From 2020 VWccn Meabrplen 61W.00 SI04.00 liI0i $125,00 1125.00 $=.00 22.2
23 Numbn of Equivalent Dwelling Unix 282,988 283.388 283.998 284,788 285,788 291,530 23
24 Esemtled lher Fees 120.910.000 620.940.0010 021,299,000 $22,763,000 124,292,000 139,357.630 24
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT M.3 Penrod 447-93
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pace 2
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1913 THROUGH MI.2002
6-year T.H1 5-Teel Toul
LINE 1992-93 1993-94 1994.95 1996-W IW697 1992.1887 1997-201 MY-T0tl LINE
25 CAPITAL FUN0151 25
26 Pro-.S C.111-A ar F- Uol Year 48.02b 000 53.88R 000 60)49,000 88.B01 000 71.298 800 48.025.000 )e 131 6W 411026 000 26
21 REVENUE 27
20 Conetmctlon Glen 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
29 Fe.a'. Connection le"I 1A10.000 1,976,OW 2.590.000 3,126.000 10,OH.OW I8.171,000 28.215.000 29
30 Iodwtriel Wool. 708.000 )]9.OW 8561000 941,000 1.035,000 4.314.000 8,954.000 11,288.000 W
31 Uaer Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
32 Selo of Capacity Rlchln 414.000 451.000 226,000 645.000 590.000 2AM0.000 705.000 3.335.00D 32
33 An....ran Fee. 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 33
34 Iin-09 Mi...0--aa.-1--- 3J]].000 4,248.000 4.795.000 5.180,000 5AS9.000 23.473.000 23.004.000 46.477,000 34
35 Traneler P-,,..d.1-COP Fvnd 23.947,000 N,395.OW 31.893.000 35.345.500 31,500.000 147.480.500 0 147.401 35
36 01her Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 36
37 TOTAL REVENUE 28.184.000 31.282.000 39.748000 45]0)500 42.023.000 1117941.600 40,834.000 236,)]9.500 37
3e TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING ))209.000 88,144.000 100.494.000 114308.500 113.321,500 238966.600 124.908500 204800.600 3e
39 EXPENDITURES 39
40 8hee of Joint Works Treelrmnt Float 19.044.000 22,228.000 28.182.000 31,710,000 20.290.000 127,434.000 SS.078,000 185.513.000 40
43 Dlovon C.Seencr Sao,.. 500.000 2.16).000 5.731,000 11.3001000 8.900,000 28.590.000 131980.000 42.658,000 41
42 DIM, 9.803.000 0 0 0 0 3.803.000 0 3.003.000 42
43 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 23.347.000 24398000 31e03000 43.010000 37100.000 169.635000 73039.000 231.874000 43
44 Cdolal 6 Envlrannwolel Rep Reserves 53.852.000 00.749.000 68.801.OW 71.298.50) 76.131,500 78.131.500 52.926.500 52.926.500 44
46 Shore of 100.000.000 CepON Reaewe 31,8)0.000 31,870.000 31,8)0,001) 31.870.000 31.870.000 31,870,000 31.870.000 31.870.000 45
45 Shore of$10,000.000 Ernewon Pesewe 3.187 000 3,107,000 9 18),000 3.187 000 3.187 GOO 3.187 000 3.187.000 46
47 Pollen al Inkeekres Roo,Surplus or Mallull 18805.000 25.892000 335"000 35,2416W 410)4800 410]46W 1)Be95W 1),3.I9J,o00 989.500 47
48 Sk.01e FaMly Rwi6wue Canneellan Fare $2.350 $2,350 $2,470 12.BW F2.720 03.400 48
49 Nwnkw of New Eerdvolonl DmIlin9 Unils 400 Boo .00 11000 1.150 I'm 49
50 Ee6meled Cenma6en Fee lmeme 19401000 01.410.000 $1976.000 $2,590000 $3.128,000 F4.002,000 50
,
t.NIIW>I.M1-NN,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.J MVIVE 4-27-93
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Poll.3
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH MI-2002
5-Year Total 5-Yaer Total
LINE 199293 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996.97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total LINE
fit BOND FUNDI51 51
52 Rovrves 6 Carry-Owr From East Yesr O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 52
53 REVENUE 53
54 T.LSYy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54
55 Inlera.l B Mlsollwtsom Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 55
58 Olbw Instant. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SS
57 TOTAL REVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57
6B TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 58
69 EXPENDITURES 59
60 Send Princlpel 6 lnletest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O BO
BI Tmmlar to Cepilel FadliBss 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01
82 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62
63 Flats.6 C.".0ans 10 Nut Yes, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 03
84 Nest Year'.NY PaMd Fuadlnp Rs.ltwltent. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 64
05 Fund Sa ama Or IDa1Ia0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e6
08 COP FUNDS N
67 Ross..6 Carrlpsr From East Y., 6.844 000 20.610.1100 12 2>J 800 13.030.600 15.285.000 6,044.000 17.035.000 B 844000 67
BB REVENUE Be
OS Now Sorrowing 30.970.000 1),000000 35,000.000 40.000.000 35.000,000 165.970,000 0 155.970.000 89
70 Intwest 6 OtSar 506.000 584.000 777,000 007,000 970.000 4,104.000 a 110 000 9,214,000 70
71 Total Raven. 39.470.000 17904000 38777000 40887000 36070.000 1]00)4000 8110000 1761114000 ]I
72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 46.320.000 38502600 49050500 54497 SW 51255000 178910000 22148000 182028000 72
)J EXPENDITURES 73
74 Project Cast Transient t.Capital Faollllies FUM 23.347.000 24,386,000 31,893.000 38,345.600 31.600.000 147.490,500 0 147.4110,500 74
75 Innrosl timed Tumlm 1.Gallatin,Fund 506,000 084.000 777,000 867.000 970.000 4,104,000 511101000 0.214.000 75
76 Coal.of lss. 1.948,500 850.000 1.760,000 2.000,000 1,760,000 6,298.600 0 11,290,500 76
)) Odhoo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ))
76 Total E.pmdllures 25.0011500 20.229.000 34.420000 30212,500 34220.000 169593000 5.110.000 104893000 78
70 Reserves 0 Catryeyst to No.t Yor 20.518.500 12.273,500 13,630,600 15,286,000 17.035.000 17,035,000 17.035.000 17.035.000 79
e0 Xapulrod Debt Bono'.Rasonnt 10,986= 11535,000 13288000 15.285.000 17.035.000 17.035.000 1].035,000 17,035.000 80
91 Fund Billions 8833500 730500 348500 0 0 0 0 0 81
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO,3 Rmi..d 4 27 93
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW P.9s 4
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 20U1-2002
6-yeor Total 5-Y-,Tom
LINE 1992-93 1993.94 1994.95 1995.98 1990-97 1892.1997 19972002 10-Y..r Total LINE
02 9U6 ARY 82
93 Reserve S From Lest Yeer 89,317,000 119.987.500 123.661.500 137.519.500 145.159.500 89,317,000 151.735.500 09.317.000 83
84 Total Revenue 10)293.000 87.425.000 114,527,000 127,821,500 121,404,000 558,470,500 324 517000 882 987,500 04
96 Telel AvelMbb Funding 196,010,000 207,412,500 238,188.500 265,341,000 255,563,500 847,787.500 478,252,500 972,304.500 55
80 Total E.Fendltures 76,622.500 83.751.000 100.669.000 120181500 114.028,000 490052000 34803300O 945.004,000 Be
07 Redamee 6 Calrv'0WI to Next Year 119.987,500 123.681.500 137.519.500 145,159500 151735500 151735500 127.220.500 127.220,500 8)
RESERVES ANALYSIS
88 Next Years Ors P.rba Funding Requirements 13.737,000 I8.564.000 1),I)8.000 18.980.000 21.709,000 21.709.000 30,211.000 30.211,000 88
09 Committee.,Resenay.20%ol Open From 3,904,000 4.247.000 4.418.000 4,514,000 4.882.000 4.892.000 ].555.0.. ],858,0.0 BB
90 0ebl Service Reserves and Fund Belenee 20,918.500 12.273,500 13,63C,500 15,285,000 17,035.000 17.035.000 17.036.000 17.035.000 90
91 Capital Bosom".S"m of It100,000,000 31.870.000 31,070.000 31.970.000 31,870,000 31,e70,00at 31,970,000 31,8]0,0.0 31,B70,000 91
92 Environmental Rod Fort.She.of 010,000.000 3,1e7.000 3,187,000 3.197.000 3.187.000 3,107.000 3,187.000 3.18].000 3.1e).000 92
93 In.urenoe a..,.. 48711000 55520000 57.238.000 71.323.500 73.042.500 73.042,600 37.261,600 37201600 93
94 Total Appreprleled Reservr 119,807.500 123,581,500 137,519.500 145.159.500 151,735.500 151.736.500 127,22o,500 12),230.800 04
95 UnepplOprleted Ross.. O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 96
80 Total Reserve. 119907.500 123661500 13J519.500 145159500 151735500 151 ]35500 12)2T0500 12]220600 98
DEBT SERVICE RATIOS
97 Sender Use COvem9e,Min 1.25 5A7 3.39 3.74 3.44 2.97 2.9. 97
98 Subordinate Lien Cmmmge.Min 1.00 3.22 2,00 2.02 1,82 1.55 1.50 98
99 Additional Benda Test 1 Sr B Sub I.Min 1.25 2.5. 2.O7 1.97 1.70 1.55 1,60 99
cam NA.mu enr�e.w uJ,N..r
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5 Rendered 4127193
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Poor,A9enoy Mammal...
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH MI-2002 Ford Tames Demand At 92-93 LwMs
N.From Changed toe 92.93
Bernmen9ln M97
No COP in 20%Comingmoy
Eedimeled 5-Year Total B-Yeer Trial
LINE 1992-93 1993.94 1994.94 199596 1996.97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10 Y.,Twel LINE
1 OPERATING FUND 1
2 Rederyed B Carry-Mew From Last Year 8.765.000 11.952.000 13.336.000 14.551.000 15 311 000 8,705,000 16 88)000 a)68 000 2
3 REVENUE 3
4 Shan,of l%To.Ali...thin 2.388.000 2.398,000 2.395,000 2.398.000 2,398,WO 11.900,000 11,900.000 23,960,000 4
4 F. led-ftiel Wurs 50.000 58.000 87.000 )),000 99,000 341,000 687,000 1.028.000 5
6 User Fwe 2.003.000 2,608.000 2.703.000 2.781.000 2.1182.000 13.65).000 IGA30.000 30,197.000 6
Idxedt 9 Mi mNlanpm lrcyme 1.411.000 890.000 984.000 1.054,000 1,093,000 5.432.000 5,342,000 10,))4.000 T
8 Fenster teem COP Funds 407,000 171.000 115.000 127,000 130,000 956.000 715.000 1.673,000 e
9 Ones,Revenue 464000 0 0 0 0 484000 0 464000 9
10 TOTAL REVENUE 7331000 9123000 9265000 8434000 8578000 33732000 34354.000 80099000 10
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 18098000 10075000 18001000 20906000 21689.000 41497000 61021000 70851.000 11
12 EXPENDITURES 12
13 Share of John Work.M B 0 1,570,000 1.820.000 1,792.000 1,950.000 2,150,000 9.090.000 14,481,000 23,569.000 13
14 Collection System M 6 0 and Other Game. 759,000 789,000 797,000 837.000 879.000 4,031,000 5.090.000 9,129.000 14
15 COP SnM., 1,015,000 2,360,000 2 471 000 2070000 3 19)000 12)11 000 0 831 GO0 30,232,000 15
19 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4.144000 4739.000 5060000 6878000 6222000 28830000 37.100000 62930000 IB
17 Worvx B Cu'.M.,he hamt Year 11.952.000 13.336,000 14.551,000 16.311,000 15.667.000 15.807.000 13.921.000 13.821,000 O
is Nor,Y..,.Dry Perl.d Furring Ra.ulramede 2.072.000 2.370,000 2.5281000 2.838.000 3.1 t1,000 3.111,000 4.049.000 4,049,000 10
19 20%Cia,ungeraY Rea lend COP..Most 466000 470.000 418,000 558000 BOT000 60)000 918000 919000 19
20 Portion of Insurance Rare,Surplus or lDetl.ial 9414000 10490000 11510000 11914000 11949000 11949000 8953000 8953000 20
21 USER FEE DATA 21
22 SirNle Family Food—War Fear $96.75 $90.75 0100.00 $102.60 1108.00 9130.00 22
22.1 WR Fee If 92 93 Team Are Raised by Fears $105.05 1189.66 1190.03 $192.93 $215.50 22.1
22.2 SFR Fee From 2020 Melon Moremminn 0100.00 1100.00 $125.00 1126.00 1124.00 $176.00 22.2
23 Number of E4uWelent Dwelling Unit. 28,904 28.954 17,029 27,129 27,264 28,004 23
24 Estimated War Fuss 12,003,000 02,608,000 12.703.000 12J91,000 12,882,000 03,840520 24
GQA XES rXr7r10 Pro W_ r t
COUNTY SANITATION DISTNLT M.5 Revised 412793
STATEMENT OF FROJECTEO CASH ROW Fors 2
FISCAL YEAFlS 1992-19*3 THBOLPOH MI-M2
5-Ymr Total 6-Year Taltl
LINE 199293 1993.94 19940.95 less-go 1996-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 IU-Year Total LINE
25 CAPITAL FUNDIM 25
26 Mervee a Crrye rFrom Last Yoor 5B94W00 9860000 11.274000 11925000 14484000 5084000 15134000 5994000 26
27 REVEMIE 27
29 Cms,1.len Grosso, 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
29 Fen: Concoction 118,000 178.000 247.000 324.000 408.000 1.273.000 2.371.000 3,644.000 29
30 IndusVisl W.I. 5.000 5,000 5.000 5.000 5.000 26.000 25.000 MIXING 30
31 User Fen 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
32 Sole of Cepaolty Rights 50.000 64.000 32.000 91,OkD 126.000 371.000 100,000 471.000 32
33 Anco9rien Fen 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 33
34 Imorest a Miacallanarr lcoome 551.000 749.000 822.000 835.000 1.048.000 4,106.000 4,699.000 e.705,000 34
35 Trereler Proceeds from COP FUM 6,278.000 0,052,000 4.050.000 3,150.000 3.150.000 23,480,000 O 23,480000 35
36 Oliver Revenue.Ee Adj.IRWD Con.16 Sole 3543000 1400000 500000 2505000 0 8.028000 0 8028000 96
37 TOTAL REVENUE 10553000 9246000 5.856.000 7090.000 4738.000 37283.000 7095.000 44.378.000 37
38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 18247.000 19.108000 16,830000 19.015.000 18.202.000 42.977.000 22.229.000 50.072,000 38
38 EXPENDITURES 39
40 SVsn of Joins Works Trestment Plms 2.880.000 3.137.000 3,693.000 4.476.000 3.993,000 1).88),000 8.197.000 29.184,000 40
41 Dismiss CelYrien System 3,5M,000 4,685.000 L312.000 75.000 75.000 8.747.O1113r 3.215.MG 12.962.000 41
42 Omrs 109000 0 O O 0 108000 0 109.000 42
43 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8.387.000 7.832000 5008000 4,651.000 4.088.000 27.843.000 11,412.000 39.255.000 43
44 Capital S E monmermal Flee Heeanm 9,s60.000 11.274.000 11.925.000 14.464.000 15.134.000 15.134.000 10,817,000 10.817.000 44
45 Seam of 100,000.000 CepIW Reomm 4.440.000 4,440,000 4,440.000 4.440,000 4.440.0t10 4.440.000 4.440,000 4.440,000 45
48 61rn.1 IMIX)0.000 Emimn From- 444000 444.00W 444000 444,000 444.000 444.000 44e 002 444.000 46
47 Portion of lmurerce For,Sorplur or l0efieitl 4976000 6390 7041000 8580000 10250000 10250000 8833000 5933000 47
4e Sm,le Fronk,ResNecoe Cennec0on F. $2.350 $2.350 02.470 MEN 82.720 $3.480 48
49 Number of New E4uivaNnt OweNrt9 Unity 50 75 100 126 ISO 150 49
50 Ea9rmtef Concoction Fas lnnme $118,000 8178.000 $247,000 $324,O00 k40e.000 $522,000 50
CWNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5 Revised 4127/93
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 3
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002
5-YwrToMl 5-Ywr Total
LINE 1992.93 199Y94 1994.95 1995-98 1998.97 1992.1997 1997-2002 10-Ywr Tewl LINE
51 BOND FUNDISI 51
52 Mervw&Cw,,Owr From Lee.Ywr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53
63 REVENUE 53
64 Tea Levy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54
55 Interest&Miacellanwue Inwme 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55
56 01M,Irwoma 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56
57 TOTAL REVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57
58 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 58
58 EXPENDTURES 59
80 Bend Pincipel&howest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BD
81 Tmwior to Capital Facilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 at
62 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92
63 Res—&Ca,,Owr 1e Navt Yee, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63
64 N.Ywi a Dry Perbd Fuming ReWi,xwnb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84
65 Fund Golan.a,IDeliei0 0 0 0 O U 0 20 65
66 COP FUNDS 66
87 Rwervee&Carryover Fem Leal Year 8873000 3WB.WO 1808000 2.031.000 2.MG.WG 9673000 2,381.000 9079000 B)
89 REVENUE as
69 New Borrowing 540,000 5,000,000 4,500,000 3.500.000 3,500,000 17,040,000 0 17,040.000 69
TO Intewt&Ot., 407000 171000 116000 127,000 138000 858000 715000 1673.000 70
71 TetN Revwve 847000 5.171.000 4616000 3627000 3.638000 17998000 715,000 18.713.000 Jt
72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 10920000 8079000 6421000 5.658.000 5844.000 27671000 3096000 20386000 72
73 EXPENDITURES 73
74 P,.jwa Cast Tranalen u Capital Facilities Food 6.278.000 6,952,000 4.050.000 3.150.000 31150,000 23.400.000 0 23.480.000 74
75 In.awl Eamed Tmwlen ro Deccan,Food 407,000 171.000 11SWG 127,000 136,000 958.000 715,000 1.673.000 75
JB Costs of 1wu. 27.000 250,000 226,000 175.000 175.000 852.000 0 852.000 78
)) Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ))
78 Tout E,os ndlwow 6,712,000 7,273,000 4,390,000 3,452,000 J 48J 000 25,290,000 716 000 1 26 005 000 78
79 Rwervw&Carry-over u NNO Year 3.805,000 1.808.000 2.091.000 2.206.000 2.331.000 2,381.000 2,381 000 2.381.000 79
80 RoWlred Debt Service Rssmas, 1.556000 1806,000 2031000 2.208.000 2381,000 2381000 2,381,000 2,381.000 80
81 FuMBelurw 2352000 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 81
..1W 1P'.essellers.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.5 Reverse 4/27193
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CAM FLOW Pepe 4
FISCAL YEARS 1092-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
5-Year Tend 5-Yesr Total
LINE 199293 199394 1994-95 1905.00 199697 1992-1997 1997-2002 1O.Yesr T.nI LINE
92 SVMMAHY 82
03 Nonerves 0 Car,,Over from Leer Year 24.132,000 25,720,000 26,416,000 26.507,000 31.901,000 24.132,000 33.102.000 24.132,000 83
04 T.I.1 Pavane 18,831,000 20640000 19538000 17.152000 14,954MQ 88013000 43184000 1311]]000 04
65 Toms Available Funding 42.983.000 46,280,000 42,852.000 45.650.000 48.938,000 112,145,000 76,348,000 ISS,309,000 05
88 Tetel Exp.Milum 17243,000 19e44000 14446000 13819000 13769000 79989000 4922)000 128,190.000 05
07 Reserves 6 Cmrr,'Over is Next Year 25720000 20416000 20,507,000 31981000 33182000 33182000 27.119.000 27119000 07
RESERVES ANALYSIS
88 Next Year's Dry Period Funding Ib4airarnnU 2,072.000 2,370,000 2,525.000 2.838.000 3.111,000 3,111,000 4.149,000 4.149.00* 89
99 Cengng ry ency Resees,20%o1 On.Fig., 460,000 478,000 516,000 559.000 607.000 007.000 819,000 919,090 09
90 Cebl Sarvlee Reserves and Fund Belance 3.908.000 1.808.000 2.031.000 2.206,000 2.301.000 2.381.000 2,3e1.0" 2.381.000 90
91 Central Reserves.Brute.11100.000,000 4,440.000 4.440,000 4,440.000 4.440,000 4.440,000 4,440.000 4,440.000 4.440000 9t
92 EnvirOnmenlel Ree Res,Sher..1$10.000.000, 444.000 444.000 444,000 444,000 444.001) 444.000 444.000 444000 92
93 Insurance Reserves 14390000 16880000 19551000 21484000 22199000 23199000 14888000 14888000 93
94 Appropriated Reserves 25.720,000 26.4111.000 20,607.000 31,981.000 33,182,000 33.182.000 27,119,000 27.119.000 94
95 Unepproprleled Reserves 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 95
96 TOUT Reserves 05720000 26428000 28,607,000 31901000 33183000 33182000 27118000 27118000 96
DEBT SERVICE RATIOS
97 Senior Lien Coverage.Min 1.25 5.00 3.00 3.04 2.01 2.66 1.98 97
BB Subordinate Lien Covers",Min 1.00 3.10 2.01 1.94 1.73 1.61 1.18 98
99 Addlrlenal Bantle Test 1 Sr 8 Sub 1.M.1.25 2.02 2.43 I.S5 1.89 1.59 1.29 99
In.n>m em w.e.e.r
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.B Bwleed 4/23193
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CAM FLOW Rating Agern,Dl.wslme,
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1893 TNROUGN 2001-M02 Prep Teaw Constant At 93 93 Lower
No Fee Changes For 93-94
Sommuln,In 88-97
NO COP In 20%Centimeters,
E.BmsM 5 Yen Total 5 Yom Text
LINE 1996.97 1992-1997 I987-2002 10-Year Toel LINE
1 OPERATING FUND 1
2 Reaews 6 Carry-O,,or From Last Year 6,737,000 8.640,000 10.066.000 11.293.000 11]99.500 0,737,000 12.117,500 6,737,000 2
3 REVENUE 3
4 Share e11%Tax Allocation 1,458,000 1.459,000 1,459,000 1,459.000 1,459.000 7,286,000 7,296,000 14,800,000 4
5 Few:Ind-I,mI Wool. 175,000 201.000 231.WO 266.WO "Stow 1.1781000 2.376.000 3.554.000 5
6 U.er Fees 3.W9,W0 3.317.000 3.895.000 4,139.000 4.588.000 18.048,000 31,195.000 50,941,010 e
J eem.l 6 MlmNlnwow Income 754.000 BB9,OW 787,000 051.000 881,SW 3,951,OW 4,739.000 B.M0.000 J
B Transfer from COP Fund. 1W,W0 144.W0 121,0M 133,000 140,000 WB.OW 722,000 1,SW.000 B
B Other Rwsnrx 127000 0 0 0 0 127O00 0 127O00 9
10 TOTAL REVENUE 8924000 5.809.OW 8.293.000 8,145000 ).3)2000 32.248000 47,028,000 )92)2040 10
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 12ee1,000 14.448000 16.359.000 1/1141000 191)1,600, 389830041 09143500 86008000 11
12 EXPENDITURES 12
13 Share of Mike Works M 60 2,536,04)(1 2.517,OOO 2.878.000 3,107.OW 3.484,000 14.903,000 23,39e,000 38,078,000 13
14 Collector,System M 60 am Othan qgr. 201.000 001,0*0 310.000 332,000 349.000 1,600,000 2.020,000 3.619,000 14
15 COP Sells. 1184000 1,405.W0 1 B)1.OW 2.842.600 3221000 10.8535m. to.,..So, 29459.60D 15
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4021.004) 4383.000 6.000.e00 0.341500 7.064.000 29600501) 44,292000 71.157500 10
17 R... ..6 Carry-Ori.r le No..Ywr 8,640.000 10,056,000 11.293,O0() 11.799.500 12,117.500 12.117,5W 14,651,500 14.951.600 LJ
19 Next Yoeis Dry Paled Funding,Requirements 2.011.000 2.192.000 2,633,000 3.171.000 3.627,O04) 3.527,O00 4,915.000 4,915.000 1s
19 20%CwMngesay Rae l sort COP.ervkel 667OW 584000 6390W M0000 )6)WO )6).WO 1.211000 1211 WO 19
M Pont..el Imam er,Res.9urolue Or IUalt00 5 002 WO )290 000 8.121.000 7.928.50c, 7.923.500 7.023.500 S) 500 6)Rfi 500 20
21 USER FEE DATA 21
22 Who.Pomil,Rwixems We,Fee O70.47 #70.47 085.00 $95.00 $105.00 I176.0f) 22
22.1 6FR Fare 0 92-93 To.An Relent It,Few $110.12 0110.58 $120.48 $130.42 1200.03 22.1
22.2 SFR Fee From 20W V410r,MwmM.n 175.W $1041.04) I100.00 $10O0() 4100.00 $176.00 22.2
23 Number of EausolaO DNtlllno Units 43.272 43,372 43,472 43,572 43,872 44,172 23
24 Wmtled Use,Few /3.WB.OW $3.317.000 $3.895.000 14,139,000 $4.58e.0W $7,7110.100 24
<Fe w..�as-uam�etewa_Meg
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6 Se rie nd 4I2M3
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pe9e 2
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002
Enimaled 5 Year Total 5 Year Total
LINE 199243 1993.94 1994-95 IM-96 199&97 1992-1997 1991.2002 10.Yew Total ONE
25 CAPITAL FUND51 25
26 Sue.B Call-,From Lwt Year 3.888.000 5,401.000 9.2M.000 7.113.000 8.15J 000 3 888,000 9,351.000 3,666,000 26
27 REVENUE 27
26 C4muuction G.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
29 Free: Connection 235.000 235.000 20,000 259.000 272.000 1.248.000 1.580000 2,828,000 29
30 InMtn.1 Waste 61.000 89.000 98.000 108.000 119.000 495,000 798.000 1.293.01 30
31 Use,Face 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
32 Sele of Capacity Rights 71.000 78.000 39.000 111.000 164.000 453,000 120.000 573.000 32
33 Annatal Feu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33
34 Interest&AS...11-e0m Inecm9 300.000 431.000 495,000 585,OW 549.000 2.477.000 1.011.000 3.488,000 34
35 Transfer Proceeds from COP Funa 4.152.000 5,456,000 5,750.GG0 8.100.000 5.425.000 20,689.000 74.600 20,963.600 35
36 Olher Rwenoe 1.012,000 O O O O 1.012.000 0 1.012.000 36
37 TOTAL REVENUE 5,887000 8,289,000 6.035.000 9.144,000 6.619.000 34,574.000 3.583.800 38.157.600 37
38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 9,653.000 11.890,000 12869.000 15.257.000 14,770,000 38,240.000 12.934.800 41,823.600 38
39 EXPENDITURES 39
40 Share of Joint Work.T,eetment Plant 3.202.000 3.831.000 4.509.000 5.405.000 4,875,000 21,902.000 10,011.000 31.973.000 40
41 District Collection Si B7O,000 1.BR5,000 1.247.000 ".01 550,000 4,342,000 S.BMOS() 11.022.000 41
42 DIMI.Co.,Trnk Wrath From F5 O 0 0 2.685000 0 2,686.000 0 2.586.000 42
43 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4.152.000 5,456.000 5.756,000 8.100.000 5.425.000 28.889,000 15 B91,000 45.580.000 43
44 Ceptel&Eminst-tci Rep Rwervee 5,401,000 0.234.000 7.113,000 81157.000 9.351,000 9.351.000 13,ne.4001 13.750.4001 44
45 Share of 100.000,000 Coal Reserve 5,470.000 5.470,000 6.470,000 5.470.000 5,470,000 5.470.000 6.470.000 5,470,000 45
46 Share of$10,000.000 Emimn Reserve 547,000 847.000 547.000 547,000 54],000 fi4J 000 54].000 54].000 46
4J PoFBon of lru0rww0 Reactor 1818.0001 21 J,000 11096,000 3 140.000 3.334000 3.3.4,000 19.]J9.4001 9]73 4001 47
48 Single Finally Residence Connetion Fee $2,350 $2.350 82.4J0 $21590 42,720 03.490 48
49 Numbs of Now Equivalent Dwelling Unite I 100 100 ISO 100 100 49
50 E.OmetW Cloneotion Fee 1-ma 8235,000 4235,000 4247,ODO $259p00 S272.000 $340.000 50
Wt .3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.8 Rameed a/23/93
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pao.3
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
5 Year Total 5 Ycor Total
LINE 1992-93 1993.94 1991 1995-96 1996-97 1992-1997 1997 2002 10 Y.,TObl LINE
51 BOND FUN0151 - 51
52 Beservn 8 Carry-OVBr From Lmt Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52
53 REVENUE 53
54 Tex LwV O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54
65 Interwar 0 MiscellBneow Income 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55
56 OIM,Incomo 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 58
57 TOTAL REVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57
58 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50
59 EXPENDITURES 59
60 Good Principal 6lnlsrwat 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 60
91 Tremler m CePlbl Facill9w 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 61
e2 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 O 63
93 Ressrva@ 9 Grr,-Over b Nest Year 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 63
04 Nast Year's Dry Pariod Fuadn,Wauhanbnb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64
65 Fmd Sal—at Galosh) 0 0 0 a 0 0 O 65
66 COP FUNDS da
67 Reserves A Ca,r worn Form Last Year 348000 3995600 1005000 2220000 2199000 348.000 2.474.d00 348,000 07
68 REVENUE 88
89 New Betrayal., 7.148.000 4.500.000 8.500.000 9.500.000 6.000.000 32,649.000 0 32.640,000 69
TO Iroo.a dMr 100000 144000 121000 133.000 140,000 638000 723000 1380000 70
71 Total Raeanw 7248000 4.Sa4.000 6.621.000 8.633.000 0.140000 33.286.000 MOOD 34.008,000 71
72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 7596000 7630600 6428800 10857600 9339600 33,634.000 3195,000 34.358000 72
73 EXPENDITURES 73
74 Project Coat Transfer@ N Capitol Fav199x Fund 4,152.000 61456.000 5.]56,000 8,100.000 5,425,000 MISSING 74,000 20,963,000 74
75 Inbreat Emmd T.N.to O,..d,Fund 100,000 144.000 121,000 133.000 140.000 038.000 722.000 1,300,000 75
76 Coab.11.... 357.400 225,000 325.000 425,000 300.000 1,832,400 0 1,632,400 70
TT Other 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 T]
7e Total Expen®turns 4,609,400 5,625,000 6,202.000 81850.000 5,955.000 J1159400 ]N0000 31956000 JB
79 Really@@ O Carryover to Next Year 2,986,800 1.805.300 2,224,600 2.198,600 2.474.600 2,474.600 2,400,000 2,400,000 ],
80 Real Deal So lea Rotarvea 1 125.000 1.350 000 1.675.000 21100.000 2.400 0000 3.400.000 2.400.000 2.400,000 e0
01 Fwd Balama 1,881,600 455,800 549,600 Holm ]4.000 74,600 0 0 81
case aa.Ne-.mw.v:.w Nn
COUNIY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.6 R.Ised 4423/93
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pegs 4
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THRWGH MI-2002
5 Year Total 5 Yser Total
LINE 1902-93 1993-94 1994.95 1995-96 1996-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Y.r Tatty LINE
82 SUMMARY 62
83 Reserves S Com Aver From Lot Year 1O.751,000 17,027,600 10.105.600 20.630.600 22.150,100 10,751.000 23,943.100 1OJ51,000 83
64 Total From. 19.058000 16.742,000 19.549,000 24,625.000 20.131.000 100.106.000 61331800 151.437.600 84
85 Total Available Funding 29.810.000 33.769.000 37.854,000 45,255,600 42.287.100 110.857.000 76,274,100 162.188.900 e5
BB Total Expmdllvrss, 12.782.400 15.660.000 17.024.000 23.099.500 10.344.000 06,913.900 81.]]9800 149693500 88
87 B..rv.0 Cerry,OY.,to Next Year 17.027.800 18.105.1100 20.1130,600 22,166.100 23.943.100 1 23,943.100 13.495 100 1 13,495 too 87
RESERVES ANALYSIS
eB Next Ymr's Ory period Funding Ractimmmb 2,011.000 2.192.000 2.533.000 3,171.000 3.527.000 3.527.000 4.918.000 4,915.000 Bs
89 Contingency Revs ,20%at Otter Room 667,000 504,000 639,000 700,000 767,000 787,000 1,211,000 1.211.000 88
80 Debt Sorrier,Reality.and Fund Selersa 2.986.800 1.905.800 2.224.600 21199.600 2.474.600 2.474.000 2.400.000 2.400.000 SO
91 Cepitel Reserves,St—el 9100,000,000 5,470,09e 5,470,000 5,470,000 5.470,000 5,470,000 5.470.000 6,4M,000 5.470.000 81
82 E—ironmonml Reg Res,She.of$10.000.000 547.000 547.000 547.000 547.000 547.000 547,000 847.000 547.000 92
83 Insumme Reserves 6448000 ]50]000 9217000 10.008500 11167600 11167,600 1047900 11.047.9001 93
94 Appropdeted Reserves 17,027.000 18.100,600 20,030.600 22.150,100 23,943,100 23.943,100 13,485,100 13.495.100 94
98 Un.prAlliatad ReaerveB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95
96 Total Passives 17,027,000 18,105,600 20,630,640 22,156,100 23 943100 28 943100 13,496,100 13 495 1S0 98
DEBT SERVICE RATIOS
87 Senior LMn Coverage,Min 1.25 8.50 10.12 0.87 4.17 3.81 3.64 97
88 9Werdlmta Lim Cewrege,Mln 1.00 3.22 2.54 2.13 1.55 1A7 1.46 H
99 Additional Bond.Test 1 Sr 0 Evil),Min 1.25 2.04 2,80 2.19 1.55 1.60 1.55 H
d Y,C IM Nt
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.T Robed 4127M3
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Rating Agemy Dimetlmn
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002 Prop Tapes Constant At 92.93 Lauri
No Fee Cbenees in 93-94
No COP in 20%Contingency
Ei t mated 5-Your To41 6-Vur Tod,
LINE 1992-93 1993-94 199495 1995-90 1996-97 19921997 19972002 10-Year Tetel LINE
1 OPERATING FUND 1
2 Rmenm B Corry-Ouer From Les,Your 13]2).000 18.471.000 21.831 iOOO 23.537.000 24,871.000 13,777.000 25,113,000 13,7)).00D 2
3 REVENUE 3
4 6Mn of 1%Tax Allmslien 3,257,000 3,257,000 3,257.000 3,252,000 3.257.000 19,285.000 16.285,000 32,570,000 4
5 Fees:Ind—Inel Waste 840.000 966,000 1.111,000 1.278.000 1.420,000 5.605.000 11,405.000 17.O70.000 5
8 Um Fem 6.235.000 5.237.000 5,242.000 5.503.000 5,778.000 28,993,000 33,958.000 001951.000 8
T Interest B MneNlanmus Income 1,888.000 1,423.000 I.800,000 1,700,000 1.761,000 8.158.000 8,129.000 10,287.000
B Trensler from COP Funds 151.000 163.000 227.000 277.000 301.000 111191000 1,272,000 2,391.000 8
9 Other Pavane 367,000 0 0 0 0 352,000 0 357.000 9
10 TOTAL REVENUE 11.508,000 11,04e.000 11,432.000 12.021,000 12.565.0D0 58,5]],000 71,049,000 129.626.000 10
it TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 26.285.000 29.517.000 33,268.000 35.558,000 37.436.000 22,354,000 98,IO2,000 143.403.000 Il
12 EXPENDITURES 12
13 Shers el Joint W.A.M&0 3.399.000 3,507.000 31856.000 4.244,000 4.06B.000 19.675.000 31,352,000 51,028,000 13
14 C011mtien 9ntem M&O end OlM,Died. 1,688.000 I.4187,000 2.481.000 I,875,000 1.069,000 9.6W.000 11,062.000 21.202.000 f4
IS COP Srvice 1.827,000 2.492.000 3,392.000 4.568.00O 5,e86.000 17965,000 32.101,000 501068,000 IS
10 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6.014,000 7,600,000 9,731,000 IO1607.000 12.323,0DO 47.241.000 75.115000 122.350.000 18
IT Rmowers B Carry-Wu to Next Year 19,471,000 21,831,000 23.537.000 24,871,000 25.113,000 25.113.000 21.O47,000 21,047,000 tT
18 Nest YmM1 Dry Period Funding Requirements 3.407,000 3.843,000 4.866,000 5.344,000 0,162,000 6,102,000 8.231.000 8.231.000 10
19 20%Contingency Res l epcl COP sr,iml 997,000 1.039.000 1,280.000 1.224.000 1,]2T.002 1,]3T,000 R,OOB4OOr] 2,OO8,000 19
20 Portion el Insurance Res,Surplus or IDoficitl 14,007.000 16.949000 IT.403.000 18,303,000 17.624.000 1T.024.000 10.800000 1 10808000 20
21 USERFEEDATA 21
22 Single Family Residence User Fee $50.09 $60.09 $50.09 $52.50 $55.00 472.50 22
22.1 SFR Fee It 92-93 Tepu Are Faleed by Fees $81.23 $61.21 083.58 086.02 *102.92 22.1
22.2 SFR Fee From 2020 Vision Mas,srplan 350.00 $50.00 F50.00 476.00 475.00 0125.00 22.2
23 Number of Equivalent Grudging Units 104.611 104,581 104.881 104,011 105.011 107,001 23
24 Estimated User Fees $S.235,000 36,237.000 $5,242.000 45,503,000 $5J36,000 gJe1.923 24
e11 Ar u.4,N 9,9Wit Far
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.J Raeind V2793
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pep 2
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2W2
5-Year Total 5-Year Tonl
LINE 1992.93 1893.94 199"S 1905.80 1996-97 I092-I997 1887-2002 10-YnrToral LINE
25 CAPITAL FUNDI51 25
26 Ro mis A Cm,,-mrsr From Lee,Year 19.810,000 25.062,000 27.471.000 30.158.000 33.303000 18810000 30,817000 18810000 20
27 REVENUE 27
29 CemOVafen Grn0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2B
29 Finite: Connection I111.000 235.000 371.000 518.000 680,000 1,922.000 9.055,000 9.8)).000 29
30 InOue,riel Wnro 201.000 211,000 222.000 233.000 245,000 1.112.000 1,422.000 2.534.000 30
31 War Fax 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 31
32 Se1e of Cooled,Fip6Y 83.000 1011000 51.000 144.000 200.000 588.000 I60.000 749,000 32
33 Ar meatien Fen 0 0 0 0 33
34 Intarea,B Miacol mono ,Imams 1.591.000 1,962.000 2.043,000 2.250.000 2.489.000 10,235.000 11,561.aW 21.796.000 34
35 Transfer Proceeds loom COP Fund 8,040,000 8.951.000 11.MB,Wo 10,840.000 7.853,000 47,998,OW 713.350 49.711.350 35
38 Other Revenue 3.249,000 0 O 0 0 3.248.O00 0 3.249.000 36
37 TOTAL REVENUE 13,888.000 11.360000 14.395,000 13.905.000 11.487000 95.105.000 21911,350 87AI6A50 37
38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 33.7O11000 38,422.000 41.898.OW 44.143. 0 44,770,000 84.815,000 58.828.350 1O0826,350 39
38 EXPENDITURES 39
40 SM.el Joint Worse Treemom,Plant 1,280.000 4.972.000 5.852.000 7.093.000 6.329.000 28.505.000 12.990.000 41,495,000 40
41 Diane,COlNmen SYetem 4.3911.O00 3,879.000 6,850.000 3,70,O00 1.52iOW 18.493,000 14.045.000 34.138,000 41
42 Over 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
43 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8.046.000 9.951,000 II7080110 10.040.000 7,853.000 479980W 271136.00)(D 75.533.000 43
44 Capital 6 Emimoremal Re,Rnervea 25.062.000 27.471,O0D W.158.O00 33,303,0001 38.917.0410 35.917,W0 31,193.350 31,193.350 44
45 Share.1100.OW,0W Coaitel Rear-, 7.130.O0O 7.130.000 J.IWIp 7,130.000 7,130,000 7.1W.000 7.130.000 7,1 W,GW 45
46 Share of 010,000,001)Emimn Roeme 713.000 713.0110 713.0100 713,000 713.OW 1 7130100 713000 1 713000 46
47 Portion 011neuurms fln,Surplm at lDalitdrl 1J218000 18628W0 223150W 254WW0 280J0000 290)4000 3d 350960 23,360.350 47
49 &nole Family Reaidom»Connection Fee 02.350 82.350 $2.470 02,590 $2.720 $3,400 48
49 NumMr of New E4uNe1ea1 DWallin9 Unix. 50 100 IN 2W 250 TOO 49
EO Estmeated Correction Fee Income 8118.004, 1235.W0 837I,e00 F519.000 F8B0.000 12.430,000 50
csr are as cl.-.».R see,
,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.] Bevisatl 4127/93
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 3
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01 2002
5-Veer Total 5-Yen Tood
ONE 1992-93 1993.94 1994-95 1995-96 1990-97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-Year Total UNE
51 BOND FUNDISI 51
52 Rosary..&Ceny-0ver From Lap Year O O O 0 0 O O O 52
53 REVENUE 53
54 Tax Lavy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54
55 Interest&M6.0 aneaw Ineems 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55
56 Oaner Inca", 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50
57 TOTAL REVENUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67
59 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50
69 EXPENDITURES 59
SO Bend Pnnapal IS Murrell 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 BO
S1 Transfer Is Capital Facilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61
62 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 62
03 R...rvw&Carry-N.,1a Next Year O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03
64 Neal Years Dry Period Funding Re4usenwrls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04
05 Fungi Balance or IDefic111 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 05
66 COP FUNDS as
oT Revervee&Cerry-uvsr From Last Year 3,089,000 1.960.350 3.459.350 4.101.350 5.139350 3.089.000 4,083,350 3,009,000 97
60 REVENUE a8
69 New Borrowing 7.913.000 11,000,000 13.00010" 12.500,01D0 0.000.000 52,413,000 0 52.413.000 a9
70 Intsreal A Other 151,000 163.000 227,000 2]],000 301,000 "118,000 1,272.000 2.391.000 ]O
TI Total Revsrwe 8.O64.000 11.163.000 13,227.000 12.777,000 8.301.000 53.532.000 1,272.000 54,004,000 71
72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 11,153,000 13.123.350 10,686.350 16,870,350 13.437350 56621,000 6.155.350 57.893.000 72
73 EXPENDITURES 73
A Project Cost Transient to Capitol Feeilitin Fund 8.64a,000 8,951,000 11,708.000 10.840,000 7.853.000 47.998.000 713,350 40,711.350 74
75 Interest Earned Trendier.to Occasion,Fund 161,000 153.000 227.000 2]],000 301.000 11119.000 1.272.000 2p81,000 76
7a Co.,.01 Wde nce 395.650 550,000 0501000 025.000 400,000 2,020,050 0 2,020,650 76
T] Other .O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 ]J
79 Tend Expenditures 9.192.650 9,064,O00 12,505.000 11.742.000 0.554,000 51,737.050 1.985.350 53.723000 79
79 R...—&Cerryawr 10 War Year 1,860.350 3,459.350 4.101,350 5.138,350 4.883,350 4.883,350 4.170,000 4.170.000 79
BO Request!DMt Somice Bassrvoe 1,945,000 2,495,000 3,145.000 3,]]0,000 4.170.000 4.170.000 4.170,000 4,170.000 00
81 Fund Balms 16.350 964,350 950,350 1,308,350 713,350 713,350 0 O 91
CWNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.9 Revised 4127re3
STATEMENT OF PNO3ECTEO CASH FLOW Ford.4
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
5-Year Total 5-Year Total
LINE 1992-93 1993-94 199495 1995.96 199657 1092-1997 1992-2002 IO-Yesr Total LINE
82 SUMMARY 82
63 Res6rves 6 Carr,- .,Frans Lest Year 36,836,000 45.493.350 52.761.360 $7.790,350 63,310,350 36.676.000 88.913.350 36.078.000 83
84 Total Revenue 33,470,000 33.589,000 38,068,000 38,783.000 32,333,000 177,214.000 94.232.360 271.446.350 94
85 Total Available Funding 70,146,000 "Af12,350 91,020.350 96,679.350 95.643.350 213,890.000 181.145,"0 30BA 22.350 85
e6 Total Expenditures 24.652.650 26301,000 34,024,000 33,269.000 28,730000 140,970.050 104,J35 350 251.712.000 86
BT Reserves 6 Carry-Over,to NLBt Year 45493.350 52261,350 67J90.350 63,310.350 66,913,350 1 66,913.350 56.410,350 1 58410.350 87
RESERVES ANALYSIS
88 Next Year's Dry period Fundln9 R...nan a. 3,407,000 3.843,000 4,006,000 5.344.000 8,162,000 0,102.000 0.231A00 0,231.000 88
89 Contingency Reaervm,20% al Oper Rqmt 997.000 1.o39p00 1.268.000 1.224.000 1,327,000 1.327.000 1,008,000 2.008.000 89
90 Debt Servlee Reserves and Fund Callen 1,900,350 3.459.350 4.101,350 5.135,350 4,803,350 4.883.350 4,130,000 4,120.000 90
91 Capital,Reserves.SM1are of$100.000.000 7,130,000 7,130,000 7,130,000 7.130.000 7.130,000 7,130,000 2,130MO 7.130,000 91
82 Enalronmental He4 Rea.Stara.1610.000.000 713,000 713.000 713.000 713.000 113,000 713.000 713,000 713.000 92
93 Insurance Reeervea 31286,000 38.5]].000 39,718,000 43,283,000 48,688,000 48898000 34158350 34.168.360 93
S4 Appropriated Reserves 45,493.350 52.761,350 57,796.350 03.310,350 06,913.350 88,813,350 56,410.350 56.410,350 94
95 Unappropriated Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95
96 Total A.... 45,493,350 52,701,350 57,796.350 53.310.350 66.913,350 68 913350 56,410 350 50,410,350 95
OEBT SERVICE RATIOS
ST Smier Lien Leveread,Min 1.25 9.69 7.33 6.08 4.28 3.52 3.53 97
96 Subordineta Use Cartledge,Mn 1.00 4.67 3.32 2.30 1.90 1.68 1.66 98
99 Additiaml Bends Test I Sr 8 But,I.Min 1.25 6.29 3.42 2.43 1.78 1.64 1.00 99
.... ..so NHm
COUNTY SANITATION DISTMCT NO.n Re feed 4127193
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Bating Annoy Dis0 rsslans
FIWAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 20011002 Prop Teie Canelem At 92-93 Leval
No Fee Ching-For 93.94
Emmering In 96.97
Nor COP In 20%Conlingen0y
Estimated SXeer Teul 6-Year Tatel
LINE 799223 1993-94 1994-95 1995.96 1990.97 1992.97 1997-2DO2 10-Yeor Taus LINE
1 OPERATING FUND 1
2 Raseran B Carry-Over From Usl Ter 12.995000 14,D12 OOO 14,5]5.000 14A82,OOO 14.681,000 12.335.000 15,047,000 12,335.000 2
3 REVENUE 3
4 S5ere 9f 1%To.AllaegOn 21059.000 21O69100D 2.059.000 2.059,000 2.059,000 10.295.000 10.295.000 20,590,000 4
5 Feet:InMlrlel Were 29O,0W 322,000 370,000 42O.00O 490.000 1,888,000 3.804.000 5,692.000 5
6 Use,Fee 3.O65,OW 3,074,000 3,857.000 4.915,000 51990.000 2O,9O1.01DO 42,802,000 53,503,000 e
I.e.,6 Misnllsreee lno9me 1.159.000 1.001.000 1,023.000 1,027.000 1.047.000 5,267.000 51805,000 11,062.000 )
8 Toosler for.COP Wnb 264.000 335.00O 184,000 1901000 103,000 1.108.000 1.030.000 2,100.000 8
9 Otiar Reeve 157.000 0 D 0 0 157.00O 0 I57 000 9
10 TOTAL REVENUE 8,994O0O 0,701000 7.493,000 6,617,000 9.))9,000 39.084.000 63.536.000 103,200,000 10
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 19.319.000 2OW3.00O 22,068000 23,099.000 24,460.000 6198800O 78,583,000 115,535.000 11
12 EXPENDITURES 12
13 Sbere of Joint Works M 8 O 9.O2O.00O 3,123,000 3.435.000 3.))9.000 4.157.000 17.52O.000 2).91),000 45.437.000 13
14 Colleegon System M 9 O eM Other Opsr. 005.000 908,000 1.463,OOO 1.126,000 982,000 5.3%.000 5.699.000 11,O39,OW 14
15 COP Sarvloe 1416.000 2197.000 2.698WO 3.513,000 4,2)4,000 14099000 26290.000 39394000 16
16 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6307.000 8.228,000 7,580,000 8418.000 9,413O0D 38962000 5a913000 95984.00) 16
I] Rearver,9 Lerry-Onrr to Nnl Tom 14.012.000 14.575,000 14,482,000 14,681.000 15,047,000 16.047,000 I9,671.00O 19,071.000 17
18 Neat Year's Dry Period Funding R84Wrenenls 2.654,000 3.114.00r) 3.]93.000 4,2O9.00O 4.)0).000 4,)O].000 8.6O4,WO 6.504.000 18
19 20%Domingetey Re front COP—lee) ]]8.000 808000 978.00O 961.000 1.O29.OW 1O20.OW I,fiW,DOO 1,bW.000 19
20 Portion of Insurance For.Surque or IDefiasO 1O59O0W 10658000 9)11.000 9491000 9312OW 8.12000 11.8)]WO 116))000 20
21 USER FEE DATA 21
22 Smile Family Presidents User Fe $60.00 $60.O0 $75.00 195.01D $115.00 $19O.01) 22
22.1 SIR Fee if 92.93 Teem Au Ralsed by Fees $100.19 0115.O2 0134.O1 $154.54 0228.17 22.1
22.2 SM Fee From 2O2O MSI0n 03asempsen 0150.00 417S.W F175.010 FI75.00 4175.00 82OO.00 22.2
23 NI el E4ul osem Dwelll',Units 51.093 61.223 51.433 $1,703 52,093 58,983 23
24 Estimated User F. $3,065,000 03.074.000 F3,857.000 F4,916.O0O $S.M.= 81O,247,27O 24
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 Hrvbed 4127I83
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Paw 2
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH MI1 !002
Estimated S-Veer Total S-Ywr Total
LINE 1992-93 1993.94 1904-95 1995-96 1096-97 1992-97 1997-2002 10-VearTmal LINE
25 CAPITAL FUND151 25
28 Few.8 Carryover From Lear Year 8,580.000 12.286,000 13,882.000 15.785,000 16,935,000 8,5B0.000 IB.9B0.000 0.580,000 20
27 REVENUE 27
28 Construction Grants 0 O 0 O O 0 0 28
28 Fwe: Connection 353,000 470.000 741,000 900,000 952.000 3.423,000 6.925.000 9.348.000 29
30 Industrial Waste 80.000 84,000 88,000 92.000 97,000 N1.000 563.000 1.004,000 30
31 User Few 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
32 Sao of Capacity Rights 78.000 85.000 43.000 12L000 169,000 497,000 135.000 032.000 32
33 Annexation Few 500.000 0 0 0 0 500J000 0 500.000 33
34 Interest 0 Marcel enea-Income 722.000 927,000 1,051.000 1,160,000 1.273,000 6.133.000 0.363.000 11,49e,000 34
35 Transfer Pmceede from COP Fund 4.600,000 11,252.000 8.019.000 8.408,000 7.650.000 39.929.000 0 39.929.000 36
36 Other Revenue 1,983.000 0 O O 0 1.983.000 6.000 1,991.000 3e
37 TOTAL REVENUE 6.316.000 12.810.000 9.942.000 10.989.000 10.141.000 51.900,W 12.994.000 64.900.000 37
38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 16.896,000 25,114,000 23,604,000 26.494.000 2T.070.000 00,48e000 31.974.000 73,400,000 38
39 EXPENDITURES 39
40 Shere Of Joint Works Trwrment PIwr 3,600.000 4,202,000 4,946.000 5,994.000 5,348.000 24,090.000 10.979.000 35,068.000 40
41 Oatdet Collection system 1100010O0 T,OSo.MO 3,073.000 3.545.000 2.749.000 17,419,000 2.945,000 20.361,000 41
42 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
43 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4.600.000 11.252.000 8.018.000 e639.000 8.096.000 41,506,000 13.923.000 55.429.000 43
44 Capital G Ewlrervmntel Fee Reserves 12,286.000 I3,11152,000 15,785,000 16,935,000 18,980,000 18.980.000 18.051.000 18,061,000 44
45 Share of 100,000,000 Capital Reserve 5,990.0p0 8.980.000 8.980.000 5.980.000 5.980.000 81980,000 5.980.000 5,880.000 45
46 Share of 110.000.000 Enown Reserve 589.000 68B.OU0 596 0 598.000 598,000 598,000 598.000 698.000 48
47 Perti9e of lmwenw Res,SmplOe Or(Deficitl 87111001) 7,284000 9,207,000 10.357.000 12.4 40 02.000 1 2000 11 473000 11.471,000 47
46 Single Family Mallows Connection Fee $2.350 02,350 $2.470 $2,590 $2.720 $3.480 48
49 Number of New Equivalent Dwelling Units 150 200 300 350 350 375 48
60 Estimated Cenmetion Fw Income 0353,000 9470,000 0741.000 F907,000 $952.000 11,305.000 50
. N. leWxs.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 Bwised 4/27/83
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 3
FISCAL YEAR31992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
6-Year Total 6 Year Total
LINE 1992-93 199394 199455 1995-90 1996-87 1992-97 1997-2002 10-Year Tool LINE
51 BOND FUNDISI 61
52 Resew"Is Carry-O✓er Ftem Lee,Yeer 22000 20,000 17,000 14.000 12.000 22000 10.000 22.000 52
53 REVENUE 53
54 Tex Levy 12.000 12.000 12.000 13,000 13,000 02.000 2BADD 90.000 54
55 Interest 9MlsaNlaneoue lrrrome 2.000 1.000 1,Wo 1,000 1,000 6,000 1.O013 7,000 56
58 DIM,Mwrns 0 0 O O 0 0 D 0 58
57 TOTALXEVENUE 14,000 13.001 13.000 14.000 14,000 68.000 29,000 97.000 57
68 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 36.000 331000 30.000 28,000 20,000 90.000 39,000 119.000 56
fig EXPENDITURES 59
60 Bend Rineipal B Interest 16.000 18.000 ie,00o 161000 181000 80.000 31.00D 111.000 Bo
BI Transfer W Capital Facilities 0 O 0 O 0 0 8.000 8.000 8t
62 TOTAL EXPENDITURES IS,000 16000 10000 10.000 16000 80.000 39.000 119000 82
W Reserves 8 Cin y-Over to Next Year 20,000 17,000 14,W 12.000 10.000 10,000 0 0 03
64 Next Yesi s Dry Period Funding Re4uiremonls 20,000 17,000 MOOS 12.000 10.000 10,000 0 0 64
86 Fund Balance or IDBlWW 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 95
69 CW FUNDS 66
87 Rwervo 6 Cerrynwr Frem Lee,Year 432.000 81356.000 2.804.000 3.335.000 3,002,000 432.000 3,427.000 432,000 W
BB REVENUE Be
Be New Eritrean, 13,183,000 81000,000 SA0 OS* 8,500,MO 8.500.000 45,183.000 0 46.183.000 69
TD Intsreel B Osten 294,000 335.000 I04.000 190.000 193.000 1.180.000 1,030,000 2,196.000 70
71 Total Rwenue 13.447.000 8.335.000 9.194000 CAWOOD 6.693.000 48349.000 1,030.000 47.379.000 TI
72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 13,879.000 14691.000 11.989.000 12.025.000 11.885.000 46781.000 41457.000 47,1311.000 72
73 EXPENDITURES 73
74 Project Cost Territory to Capful Frei Fund 4.600.OW 11.252.000 8.010.000 0.408.000 7.650.000 39,929.000 0 39,929.000 74
75 Inletest Earned Tremfers to Cornering Fund 264,000 335.000 184,000 1901000 193,000 1.166.000 1,030,000 2.196.000 75
)6 Cents 01 Issue- 659,000 300000 450.000 425,000 425,000 2.259,000 0 2,259.000 TO
)) OIM1er O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 ))
78 Total Expenditures 5,523,000 11,887,000 8,853.OW 91023,000 8,268,000 43.354,000 1,030,000 44,384.000 76
79 0oaerves 9 Cenycver to Next Ymr 8,35B4O00 2,804.000 3,335.000 3,002,000 3.427,000 3.427.000 3,427.000 3,427,000 79
00 Resulted Mal Ssrvies Reserves 1.827.O00 2127.000 2.6)),OW 3,002.000 3.427.000 3427,000 3.427000 3,427,000 90
01 Fund Belame 6.529000 8)).000 750OW 0 0 0 0 0 all
am.a_R _ .-Passe
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.11 flwised 4/21V93
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 4
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001.2002
5-Year Total S-Yesr Teta1
LINE 1992.93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-93 1992-97 1992-2002 10-Year Total UNE
B2 SUMMARY 82
83 Rani&Carry Ovar From Lest Year 21,369.000 34,084,000 31.256.000 33,616.000 34,630,000 21,369,000 37,464.000 21.369.000 83
84 Total Ravanus 20,761.000 25,957,000 26,632.000 20,010,Oe0 28,627,000 137,987,000 77,589,000 215,676000 84
85 Total Available Funding 50.130.000 60.641,000 57,080,000 81.626.Oee 63.257.000 159.356.000 115.053.000 236.945.000 85
86 Toted Expenditures 15.448,000 29.383.000 24.274.0,00 26.995.Oee 25.793,000 121.892,000 73.904.000 195.796.000 88
87 Reserves&Carry-Over,to Next Year 87
RESERVES ANALYSIS
88 Next Year a Dry Period Funding Requirements 3.674.000 3.131.000 3,907,000 4,221,000 4.717,000 4,717.000 0,504,000 8.504:000 88
09 Contingency Reserve,209E of Oper Rome 778.000 006.000 978,000 981.000 1,020,000 1.028,Oee 1,59e,000 1,590,000 08
90 Debt Service Reserves and Fund Balance 8.356.000 2.804,000 3.335.000 3,002,000 3.427,000 3,427.000 3.427:000 3,42T,000 90
91 Capital Reserves,Share of Bl ee,000,000 5.990.000 5,900,000 5,980,000 5.980,OOe 5,980,000 5,980.000 5,98e000 5.990,Do0 91
92 Envinormembel Real Rise.Share at$10.000.000 598.000 590,000 598.000 590,000 698,000 590.000 593,000 598.000 82
93 Insuraxafles— 16,298.0.0 17,939,000 18.919.000 19.848.000 21.714.000 21.714.000 23.050.000 23,050,000 93
94 Approprieled Rmarv» 34,084,000 31.268,000 33,616.000 34.630,000 37,464,000 37,464,000 41,149,000 41.149.000 94
95 Unappropriated Rarm— 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 95
96 Talal Reserves 34,684.000 31258000 33616.000 34,930.000 37,464,000 32.464,000 41.149.000 41.149.000 96
DEBT SERVICE RATIOS
97 Same,Lien C—iinge,Min 1.25 11.15 &70 8.23 5.30 4.71 5.08 97
98 Subordirab Lien Coverage,Min IX0 3.05 1.97 1.68 1.71 1.07 1.90 98
99 Addlllonal Banda Two l Sr&Sub I.Min L25 2.74 1.97 1.89 1.50 1.04 1.95 99
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 Remixed 04127193
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pep 1
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2001-2002
Eellmetil 5-Year Talal S`Ymer TOW
LINE 1992.93 1993.94 19.4-95 1995.99 199597 1992-1997 1907.M2 I&Yaar Tetel LINE
1 OPERATING FUND 1
2 Reeervw 6 CGG,Over From Unit Yem 1.012,000 1,127,000 1,247,000 11359,000 1p98,000 1,012000 1876000 1,012.000 2
3 REVENUE 3
4 SMIs 0f I%Tax AlbuWn 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 4
5 Faec:Inetindal Waste 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
B Ueer F. 674,000 694,000 732,000 701,000 832,000 3,713,000 5.0011000 8,714,000 8
Intoet 3 Mumallermov.lrwame 75,000 04,000 92,000 100,000 10&000 480.0100 007,000 1.067,000 T
a Tritest.,from COP Funde 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e
9 Other Revenue 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
10 TOTAL REVENUE 750.000 778.000 e24,000 ee1000 940000 4173.000 61108000 9,791.000 10
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 1,252,000 11805.000 2071000 2240000 2.409,000 6186000 7182000 10,793.000 11
12 EXPENDITURES 12
13 SM.Of Joint Work.M 9 O 434.000 448.000 493.000 542.000 5801000 2,513,000 4.4106,000 a,518,000 13
14 Collection System M 80 end Odi Ooor. 173,000 182,000 191.000 201,000 211,4100 958,000 1,227,000 2.188.000 14
16 COP Soi 28.000 28.000 29000 28.000 29.000 140.000 140.000 280,000 15
18 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 635,000 958,000 712,000 ))1.000 835.000 3811000 8372000 e.983.000 I9
17 Removes 6 Cerry-Over to Next Year 1.127,000 1,247,O0O 1,359,000 1,459,000 1.574,000 1,574,000 1.81010" 1.810.000 17
to Next Years Dry Per"FunWn9 Ro4uinmente 318,000 329.000 350.000 306,000 416.000 418,000 6281000 629.000 IB
19 20%Center,.,Fee Well COP eervicel 127,000 131.000 142,400 164.200 1W,000 la).DOD 261.000 2fi1 600 18
20 Portion Of Insurance Re.Surialue or IDeficill OB2.000 760400 980a00 928,800 9B80DO BBB 000 928400 928400 20
21 USER FEE DATA 21
22 Sin&Femlly Nseid..Ueer Fe $100.00 $100.00 $102.50 $105.00 1107.50 1110.00 22
22.1 BAR Fee IF 92.93 Taxes Are Reled by Feem $100.00 $102.52 1104.97 1107.49 $109.96 22.1
22.2 SFR Fee From 2020 Melon Meoleelen $90 00 195.00 195.00 1100.00 11105.00 $130.00 22.2
23 Number of E4uivilent D"lln9 Unit. 5J40 0.940 7,140 7,440 ).)40 10,740 23
24 Fatimeted Goer Fee $074,000 0094.000 6732,000 $781.000 1e32.000 i1,101,400 24
CFI>_putt_M]m-sae N.1-Iqr]
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 13 Reviled 04I21/99
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pepe 2
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002
5-Ynr Total 5-Ym]Teb1
LINE 1992-93 109394 1994.98 1995.96 1996-9) 1992.1987 19973002 1O.Yeer Total LINE
25 CAPITAL FUNDISI 25
26 Rat-of 6 Cer,y,nea From Use,Year 8454000 8568000 )47)000 8462000 6346000 8404000 4499000 9464.000 26
27 REVENUE 27
28 Construction Grenta 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
29 Feet: Cpnnanlen 470.000 470,000 741,000 ))7,000 1,068,000 3,546.000 11,215.000 14J51.000 29
30 Intandal Weele 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
31 War Fan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31
32 Sale of Capacity RiOltte 81000 9.000 5,000 13,000 18.000 53.000 15.000 58.000 32
33 Annexe,lpn Feu 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 33
34 Ina araat 6 Mioeellamm—lmema 639.000 5901000 4M.000 420,000 349.000 2.471.000 1,709.000 4.180.000 34
35 Trainer Prppeeda nrem COP Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35
35 OIM,Morse, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39
37 TOTAL REVENUE 1.117000 1047000 1.241.000 1210000 1488000 60'M000 12939000 19008000 37
38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 10,681.000 8608000 8718000 7702,000 6,901000 18534.000 17438000 28473,000 38
39 EXPENDITURES 39
40 Sltaq of Join,Werke Trenment Plant 390.000 455.000 5301000 849,000 579,000 2,609.000 11I91.e00 3.800.000 40
41 Gnrin Cnllac0on System 458.000 473,000 490,000 507,000 623,000 2,449.000 3.211,000 6.600.000 41
42 OINar,Jt E4Wry 6 Din Capacity 1.1))000 1.200.000 1.200 000 1,200,000 1,200,000 5,977,000 6,000 000 11,977,000 42
43 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2.023,000 2.128.000 2.220.00) 2.350.000 2,302,000 11,035.000 10.402,000 21,437,000 43
44 Cpllal S Emironmentel Mp Hoene, 0,558,000 7,477,000 6.482.000 5.340.000 4,499,000 4.499.000 7.036.000 7.030,000 44
45 SMFe of 100,000.000 Capitol Reserve 6601000 680,000 660.000 860,000 550.000 650.000 650.000 0601000 45
48 SNere at 110.000.000 Eny0pn Reserve 65,000 BB 000 65,000 05,000 0 86.00 85,000 00 11,000 4S
65.0
4) Portion el Inauraie Rn,Surlln or 10allalll 7,643,000 6,762,000 5,777,000 4 831 000 3)64 NO 3)SI 000 8.321 000 5 321 000 47
48 Slnpla FemNy Mid..Cpnmatlpn Are $2,360 02.360 $2.470 12,590 $2,720 $3.490 46
49 NumSa on New EpuWelent DYnlllnp Ual. 200 200 300 300 400 900 49
50 Ea,imeme,Cennm,lpn Fee imam. 0470,000 1470.000 1741.000 1777.000 1110881000 $3.132,000 50
t,m.auw,T�.mM,NH,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.13 RWI.Od 04127193
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Paps 3
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2001-2002
5 Y..r Tend 5-Ymr Teel
LINE 1992.93 1993-94 1994.95 19969E 1990.97 19921997 1997-2002 10-Year Talal LINE
51 BOND FUNDISI 61
52 Reservm 9 Carry-Over From teat Year O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62
63 REVENUE 53
54 Tarr Lwy O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 54
55 Intarwt 3 Miscellaneous Income 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 55
56 Caner Income 0 0 0 0 56
57 TOTAL REVENUE O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57
58 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55
59 EXPENDTURES 59
BO Bond PareaN l 9 fivenoal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90
91 Transfer t0 Capital Faallidas 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 9t
62 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 62
63 Resomes B Catty-Over to Neat Year 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 93
64 Next Ymr-o Div Parini Funding Requirements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Be
65 Fund Sean..or IDelclO 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 65
BB COP FUNDS 9B
67 Rxervas 9 Can,—.F nn Unit Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67
60 REVENUE BB
09 New Sorrowing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 69
70 Willett 9 016er 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 TO
TI Total Revenue 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O TI
72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 72
73 EXPENDITURES 73
74 Proleol Co.,Tnnalen la Cepltal Fecllilim Fund 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 74
75 Intermt Earned Transfam to Opereling Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
TB Co..61 I—n x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TB
n Otnm O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 n
79 Total Eapendlmroe 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 TB
79 Ream m B Carry'owr 16 Naal Ymr 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 T9
BO Mqulred Debt Service Rmarne 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 90
01 Fund Balance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91
C rl aaergYtlM-p:N ton
COUNTY SANITATION MSTNICT NO. 13 Beviw00012)I93
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Peed A
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROUGH 2O01-2002
6Aan Total 5-Yar Total
LINE 1992.93 1993-94 199495 1995-H 1996.97 1992-1997 1997-2002 10-4rer To.l LINE
82 SUMMARY 02
83 Mnrva 8 Cerry-Ooar From Lou Year IO.478,000 9.885.000 8.724.000 7,851,000 81015,000 10,478.000 8.073.000 10,476.000 B]
Bs Total Revenue 1.007000 1,025.000 2.O65.000 2.091000 2.395.000 10243.000 18,581000 20.790000 BO
05 Total Available Funding 12.303.000 11,510.000 10.709.000 9,902,000 9.210,000 20.719.000 24.620.000 39.268.000 05
86 Total Expenditures 2,656,000 2.)BB 000 2.9]8,000 3.12).000 3.1]).000 14.040.000 16.))4.000 30.020.000 Be
B) Raerva 1.Noxt Yen 9 665,000 8,724,000 7.851,000 8.015 000 6.073.000 1 6.073.000 8.846.000 8,848,000 B)
RESERVER ANALYSIS
00 Part Yeaia Dry Period Fwr6n9 Ite nanranb 318,000 329,000 358,000 388,000 4I8.000 418,000 629.000 629.000 Be
91 Continedncy Rnerva.20%el Opn Mont 127.000 131.600 142.400 156.20D 167.00D 107,000 251,B00 251.600 91
69 M5t Sur Rxerva land Food Belarro 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 89
90 Cepiul Boeervaa.SMre of B100,000.000 650.000 050.000 850.000 BSOAOD 850.000 650,000 6501000 050.000 90
92 Envi,..—nlal flag Bow.Slnu el 4110.000.000 WOOD 65.000 65.000 65,000 65.000 65.000 65.000 55.000 92
93 In.urance Feserv.. 8.525,000 7.540.400 9,837.000 5.659.800 4,))3000 I773000 7.M0.400 7.250,400 93
94 ApprepruteG Pasrva 9,805.000 8,726.000 7.851,000 O.B16,0p0 6.073.000 11A73.000 9.806.000 8.848,000 90
95 Unappropriated llaerva 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95
90 Total Reserva 9 685,000 B 72/ODD 7,851,000 6 815,000 6.073 000 60)]000 0 8d0.000 roaroari8 0 e 000 96
DEBT SERVICE RATIOS
97 Senior Um OOvnaoe BgVAH IDIVpl FOIVADI 9OIVAR IONVgl IDIVNI 97
98 SuberErub Lion COueroq 05.00 42.69 69.32 40,10 50.71 130.81 9B
99 Additional Bond.Tal l Sr B Sub 1 35A9 05.00 42.96 49.95 48.43 I10.14 99
.pw wrm--ro:2e wJp r
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.14 Rxis sd a27M3
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Page 1
FISCAL YEAR91992-1903 THROUGH MI-2002
61
imtle6 5-Year Total S.F.Telal
LINE 1 1893-94 199"s 1995-96 1996-97 92-198 1 -Y—T UNE
1 OPERATING FUND 1
2 Rwervro&Carry-Over Fmm Lost Yesr 474 COO 070,00085 000 940 000 9111000 476 WO 70,000 474 2
3 REVENUE 3
4 Sbre 81196 Tea A0ex8on 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
5 Fax:Ind.WW Wnto O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 5
6 Ueer Fax 1.600.00D 1,600,000 1.600.0W 1.600.000 1.600,000 e.000.0W 11.218.000 19.218.000 e
) Inlewt&NSe0allerwOw In. 41,000 54,000 64.000 66,000 59,000 264,000 VI1000 555,000 T
8 TTxeler Imm COP 1.& 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 8
8 Olmor A. 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 8
10 TOTAL REVENUE 164 64 1000 1654W0 18W0 1 666 000 1659000 B 2114,M OW 19773000 10
11 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 2115000 2] 4000 518000 R606 WO 2575000 8756000 12251000 47,000 11
12 E%PENOITURE9 12
13 Sinsrs el Jint WsrBe III&0 834.000 1361.O00 847.OW 1.042.000 1,148.000 4.830.000 ),TW.OW 12.530,000 13
14 Colbe9an Sysxm M&0..4 OIMr Open. 449.000 446.000 404,O00 493,O00 502,000 2,341.000 2,830.O00 5.171.000 14
15 COP Ssrv . 185 85000 1650W 165 16800 85000 826.M 1,41,50,000 15
le TOTAL E%PENDITURES 1445000 14)2000 IS)B 000 1B900W 1013000 7998000 11355001) 19351000 IB
17 Rxervx&Carry-Owr to Nsot Yxr 87O,OW 852,000 940.000 91B4O00 7112.000 762,WO s88,000 896,W0 17
18 Nxt Ye.M1 Dry PxieO F—c in9 gsyuirorxnts O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 18
18 20%CeMing,Rx Wd COPesrviwl 258,000 261000 282000 305000 330000 000 48 000 492000 19
20 Pertien of In.. .»Res.Su,pWB or lOslltiO 414000 591,202 658000 Bll.ODO 432000 432,000 4 1,200 404000 20
21 USER FEE DATA a
22 Single FrtrBly Resilmce Lsssr Fee 90 90 FO W W F0 22
22.1 WR Fee It 100%Teaw Ane gvert" 221
22.2 SFR Fee Frem 2020 Vi itst Mealerplan 22.2
23 Number 01 E@rivalxt Dws%w Units 0 0 O 0 0 0 23
24 Eslintat"User Fax 00 80 60 FO FO 90 24
COUNTY BANRATION MSTNCT NO, 14 Romed 4127I93
STATEMFM OF PROJECTED CASH ROW page 2
FISCAL YMRS 1992-1993 THBWGH 2001-2002
S.YearTOlel S-Year Tons
LINE 1992-93 1..3�94 199495 1995-98 1996.97 1992-1997 1997- 2 1DXeer Tiogl LINE
25 CAPITAL FUNDI51 25
26 8esomos 308npever From Last Year SASOOOO 8784000 611B000 70930 7,123000 5 00 72 5180000 26
27 REVENUE ]]
20 Coatruotien also. O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 29
29 F—: Connee is,n O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 29
30 Industrial Waste 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 30
31 Us.,Fees 8.000,000 0.400,000 10.200,000 51500.000 4.700.000 36,900,00p 0,500,000 45,300,000 31
32 Sale of Cepecly Rights 76.000 83,000 72.000 118.000 185,000 515.000 130,000 645.OD0 32
33 Amaaation Fen 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 33
34 Interest S Misalleaeue Income 424.000 481.000 491,000 504,000 509,000 2,409,000 2,588,000 5,008.000 34
35 Trereler Proved.from COP Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35
36 Other Bwena O 0 0 O 0 0 36
37 TOTAL REVENUE 8 . a INFLOW 10783000 6123000 5374000 39724000 1128000 50953000 37
38 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNNING 13.BW.000 16748000 17539000 13 6000 1249)01)0 44904000 10482000 58133000 36
39 E%PENDITUOES 39
40 Shso el Joint Wort.T..nt Plant 3.510,000 4,097.008 4,622.000 5.844,000 5.214.000 23.487.000 10.703,000 34.190,000 40
41 Might C011sctipn Systgm 1.500,000 4.875.000 5.634,000 239.000 50.000 12.298.000 250.000 12,540,000 41
42 On. 1886000 O O O O I Bag,got, 0 09800 42
43 TOTAL E%PENORUOES fi898000 997 10458000 6,083,000 5264000 37671000 10953000 48624000 43
44 Capital B Enin orunenul 9p 9sssrvn 8,704.000 6,776,000 7.093.000 7,123.000 7,233,000 7,233,000 7.509,000 7.509.000 44
45 Share of I M000,000 Capita 9n.— 5.840.000 6.040.000 5.040,000 5,840.000 5.840,000 5,,hio.o0 5,840.000 5.840.000 45
46 Shen 6f 910.000,OD0 E.,on Bnerve 684,000 5S4G00 584000 504000 2
84 884000 504000 6400. 46
47 Ponsin of lnurerce Rn.Surolu,er lMGat1 38000 36 659000 e88000 609000 809000 1OB5000 1085000 47
48 Snele family Neaidaa Cwow.e.n Fa $2,350 02.350 02.470 $2,590 02.720 03.400 48
49 Number 0f New E4uivWm Dwelling UrvN 0 0 0 0 0 0 49
SO Fa4meted Conneclion Fe6lrc.ms $0 $0 90 $0 90 O0 50
.rw,em�rp:ae wa-Ne.a
COUNTY SANITATION DISMICT NO.14 R"wiml 4127M
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CAM FLOW Pepe 3
FISCAL YEARS 1992.1993 THROUGH 2O01.2002
S.Yxr To,., 5-Yesr Tool
LINE 8 8- > >. 0 Llxf
51 BCND FUND(S) 61
52 Rarorvn&Carry-der From Last Year 0 0 0 O 0 52
53 REVENUE 53
54 Tea Larry 0 0 0 54
55 Interest&Mlaoelleneox Worms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55
59 Other 0 O O0 O 0 58
57 TOTAL REVENUE a 0 0 It 0 0 0 0 57
58 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 59
59 EXPENDITURES 59
80 Bend Prlrwlprl&Interest O 0 O 0 0 0 O O 80
at Trxrtrr to Capful Froode. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 81
82 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82
83 Fnervw&Corry-der Is Neat Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e3
54 Neat Yxi s Dry Period FundM9 Re4ulramenb 0 0 0 Q O 0 84
BS Fund Balance or Idllcitl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85
88 COP FUNDS BB
e> Reserves IS Deny—From Last Year 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 87
88 REVENUE 88
89 New Berrewin9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89
70 Intern,to 01", 0 0 a 0 0 0 O 0 70
71 Total Reverwa 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 71
72 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDING 0 0 0 O 0 72
73 EXPENDITURES 73
74 Prelxt Cost Tordi to Capital Faeill0es Fund 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 74
75 Ideas,Earned Tionesta.to Deeming Fund 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78
78 Co..el Issuenes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78
» 00wo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D
78 Total EaxnNlurx 0 O 0 a 0 O 0 0 78
79 Reserves&Cerry<yn a Neat Year 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79
90 W4ulred Debt Senlx Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 so
81 Fund Menx 8t
CF l4 10ndl9 aI➢ai_10'.38 WPa,a
COUNTY SANITATION DISTINCT NO.14 R-iesd 4127M3
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED CASH FLOW Pope 4
FISCAL YEARS 1992-1993 THROIIOH MI-2002
5-YOOr Tool 5-Yxr Total
LINE 19 4- 1990-97 99 - 99 997- 02 el LINE
02 SUMMARY 82
03 Rxervx A Derry-Outr From Lam Yeer 5,654,000 7.454.000 7.029,000 8,023,000 0.039,000 5.664.000 7.995,000 5.654.000 93
84 Total Revenue 1 141 12,427,000 7,789,000 7,033,000 41100B 000 22718,000 70,720,000 64
86 Tonal Auallable Funding 15,786,000 W072.000 20.055,000 16.812.000 16.072,000 63,062.000 30,713,000 78.380.000 09
00 Total Errpendlluas 8,341,000 10 444 0 ])]3 000 7,077,000 45,887,000 22,308,000 87 9)5 00 08
87 Rxervx 8 CarrytNnn to Nem Year 7454000 7620000 0023000 8039000 )995000 7995000 0405000 8405000 87
RESERVES ANALYSIS
88 Nam Yxi s Dry PerlOd Funding IleRuirwnents 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O BB
89 COntinBanoy A--.20%01 O,R00mt 256,000 261.000 282.000 305.000 330.000 330.000 492.000 492,000 se
BO Coal Servix Rxerxa end Fund Sol4nx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90
91 Capital Rxervx,Stairs of 4100.000,000 51840.000 6.840.000 5,840.000 5.840.OW 5.840,000 5,840,000 fi,840.000 6.840,000 91
82 Enuinnataud Rsg Ram.BM1ere o1110.000.001 504.000 584,000 584.000 584.000 684,000 564.000 584.000 684.000 92
93 Ixwexe Rxervx 74000 B43 OOo 1317000 131COW 1 41000 1241000 1469 1489000 83
94 Appropilsied Raearvx 7.454.000 7.628,000 6.023.000 8.039.000 7.996.000 7,995.000 S.4O5.000 8,405,(100 94
95 UrreppropJeNd Rxrvx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 95
80 Total Rxervx 7,454,000 7,628,000 B 0 3 O 0 0 95 000 )89S 0 0 B 005 405 000 BB
DEBT SERVICE RATIO$
97 Sanlor Lien COxuae B)
98 Subordinate Lion Courage 5.22 5.52 4.96 4.63 4.15 4.75 BB
99 Additbrwl Sends Test 1 Sr B Bub 1 5.96 5.22 6.52 4.95 4.63 5.85 99
PROVIDED TO FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE APRIL 22, 1993 BY DIRECTOR SWAN
- BACKGROUND ON 1993 PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX SHIFT
In 1993 It appears that Orange County will again be required to shift additional
proceeds of the 1% property tax now being used to fund county, city, and special
districts, to fund schools. This will have the effect of reducing the state's obligation
to fund schools, thus reducing the state deficit. During 1992 this state-mandated
shift pitted cities, the county, special districts, and the school districts against each
other in fights to protect diminishing, but needed, funds.
There appears to be several hems at play that make the shift situation In Orange
County especially unfair:
1. When the legislature allocated the 1% property tax in 1978 after the passage
of Prop. 13, It did so proportionally to how taxes were being collected prior
to Prop. 13's passage. In Orange County's case this allocation resulted in
close to 45% of the 1% being allocated to K-14 schools (the state provides
the rest out of proceeds from Income taxes and other funds), with the
remaining 55% being allocated to all other entities. This contrasts sharply
with the statewide average of 35%to schools and 65%to fund all other levels
of local government.
Since 1978 Orange County has been penalized hundreds of millions of
dollars, getting less than the average share of state funds for schools and
committing less to local government than any other county in the state.
2. One would think that because of the disproportional contribution by Orange
County residents to their local schools that these schools would be the best-
funded, richest schools in the state. Not so.
Due to an allocation process in the early 1970's after the Serrano Priest
decision, 22 of the 29 K-14 districts (the vast majority) have become 'poor'
districts; that is, the amount allocated per student is less than the state
average per student. This resulted in a roughly $60 million shortfall to the
Orange County schools during the 1990-91 school year versus the state
average.
So, not only are we paying disproportionally more for schools In Orange
County, we are also allowed disproportionally less from the state to run
them. This situation has become worse during the past several years as a
consequence of our urbanization and growing foreign-born population.
The 1992 and the proposed 1993 tax shift compound an already
unacceptable situation for Orange County residents.
In 1993, with another large budget deficit projected, the state is planning to
shift even more of the 1% property tax to fund the state's obligation to
schools and reduce state budget obligations.
What happens to the schools? Do they benefit from this unfairness? No!
The added taxes transferred to the schools are offset dollar for dollar by a
reduction in state funding. In fact, the schools get less, because they are
charged for the collection of these funds and have to pay higher fees -
principally in the form of higher water, sewer, and other utility rates that are
increased to offset the decrease in receipt of local property taxes caused by
the shift.
The proposed tax shift is a long-term solution to the short-term problem of
a large state government deficit caused by an economic downturn. On the
short term the State should focus on helping businesses succeed, by
reducing taxation and eliminating regulation in order to Increase earnings,
improve tax collection, and reduce social/welfare expenditures. Long term
the State should commit to better balance the contributions being asked of
the various counties to correct the gross inequities that currently exist. The
State should commit to reallocate funds back to counties In a manner to
equalize each county's contribution to schools from local property taxes.
. . • . GANA Ili199 1IMMEN
lik- mEMEMEMoll
• •
IMMIN
41 MEN
4r 7
3 t ( Fi
� t e Y%a"•°`'ad,,tf3. r r r r �' r ej f ,� ^a2M'Ly�£�"t
E
I v F.�•i+ a7
- �y�r;pgfp
v.,ys� �qr" r $ �S�j� SE•�.. 1 ®Ew q: q
MM
1 11
• . : . : v • : • • 1
ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX LOSSES FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS IN ORANGE COUNTY
92-93 AV Est. 93-94 Total 92-94
District Tax Loss AV Tax Loss AV Tax Loss
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
East Orange County Water Dist. $215, 106 $399, 483 $614 , 589
E1 Toro Water District $223 , 906 $415, 825 $639, 731
Irvine Ranch Water District $118,525 $220, 118 $338, 643
Laguna Beach County Water Dist . $418, 000 $776, 286 $1 , 194 , 286
Los Alisos Water District $301, 397 $559, 737 $861 , 134
Moulton Niguel Water District $4 ,805,418 $8 , 924 , 348 $13 , 729, 766
Orange County Water District $2,749, 250 $5, 105,750 $7 , 855, 000
Santa Margarita Water District $505,935 $939, 594 $1', 445, 529
Santiago County Water District * $98, 000 $882, 000 $980, 000
South Coast Water District $753,000 $1 , 398,429 $2 , 151 , 429
Yorba Linda Water District $242, 000 $449, 429 $691, 429
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS $10, 430, 537 $20,070, 997 $30,501„ 534
* Santiago CWD lost 10% of total revenue in 92-93 budget's 35/10 test.
GOVERNOR'S LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROPOSAL
o $ 150 million from "enterprise" districts
o $2.075 billion in general property taxes
from cities, counties, special districts
o $300 million from redevelopment agencies
o $70 million one-time from counties
Causes of 1993 . 94 Shortfalls
1992 - 93 Revenues 2.7 billion
Shortfall from Predictions
Due to Economv
Automatic Repeal 15 billion
of 1991 - 92
1/2 4 Sales Tax
Reinstitution of .3 billion
Suspended Business
Tax Break (1991 - 92)
Snack Tax Repeal .54 billion
by Voters (Nov. '92)
3% Inflation in Some Costs, 2.46 billion
Prop. 98 guarantees, other
TOTAL 75 billion
` April 15, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
BI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
STAFF REPORT 10EAA EWB AVENUE
OO.BOX 0127
v� DISTRICTS ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING FOUNTAIN M419A2-2411A82028-B12>
mA�esx-zA++
SOURCE CONTROL FEES,
ADMINISTRATIVE FEES,
NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES,
AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES
1.0 SUMMARY
Districts' staff is requesting guidance regarding potential revisions to the Ordinance
Establishing Source Control Fees, Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance Fees, and
Miscellaneous Charges (Fee Ordinance). The fees and charges established by the Fee
Ordinance pursuant to the February 7, 1992 Wastewater Discharge Regulations (WDR
Ordinance) are intended to provide revenue to assist in the enforcement of the WDR
Ordinance and recover costs of administering the Districts' Source Control Program, and
certain costs of operation and maintenance of the Districts' sewerage system. Annual
sewer use fees for direct industrial dischargers are charged pursuant to provisions
contained in the WDR Ordinance. These include fees for wastewater discharge permits;
fees for the treatment and disposal of trucked wastes; fees for the collection and
processing of water consumption data and tax data; and fees for sampling non-compliant
dischargers. An evaluation of the present fees and charges has shown that for a number
of cases, revisions at this time may be appropriate to reflect the actual cost of providing
. / services for which the fees are levied. This report provides background information for
consideration of potential changes to the existing fees
2.0 BACKGROUND
The Districts' Source Control Division periodically reviews fees and charges established
in the Fee Ordinance as they relate to costs associated with the pretreatment program.
Based on this review, the actual costs for the following fees and charges have changed in
accordance with changes in sewerage system and administrative costs:
■ Fees for the issuance of Class I and Class II Permits;
■ Waste hauler charges; and
■ Non-compliance sampling fees and analytical charges.
In addition, to insure that the full costs of the waste hauler program are recovered, two
new fees should be considered for incorporation into the Districts' fee structure:
■ Charges for pre-arranged discharges to the Waste Hauler
Station after regular operating hours; and
J
■ Charges for emergency discharges to the Waste Hauler
Station after regular operating hours.
Fiscal Policy Staff Report
April 15, 1993
Page 2
In each case, our options are as follows:
A. Keep the fees at the same level - in this case, there would be
no impact on permittees, but cost recovery would be
transferred to other revenue sources/users. For some fees,
this places an unfair burden on dischargers who subsidize
costs related to discharge violations, permitting, monitoring &
sampling, and other administrative actions.
B. Adjust the fees according to the estimated cost increases - in
this case costs would be directly recovered from the
applicable users with some impacts for permittees.
C. Adjust the fees to an interim level to be determined - in this case some of
the direct costs would be recovered from the applicable users with an
impact on permittees, while some costs would be transferred to other
revenue sources/users.
3.0 PERMIT FEES
Permit fees are intended to recover the administrative costs of issuing permits. These
costs include processing and review of permit applications, facility inspections to verify
manufacturing and pretreatment information provided in permit applications, producing
and transmitting the permit, and maintenance of the permit data management system.
Pursuant to revisions to the Federal pretreatment regulations (40 Code of Federal
Regulations 403.8), permits for Class I industrial users must contain statements of
duration and non-transferability, effluent limits for all standards, self-monitoring,
sampling, reporting, record keeping and notification requirements, and statements of
applicable civil and criminal penalties for discharge violations.
In accordance with these requirements, the Districts have revised the permit application
and permit format for all Class I Users, which increased the administrative costs for
issuance of permits from WO/year to $335/year. Revisions have also been made to
Class If permits resulting in a cost increase of S33/year to S70/year. These fees are
shown in Table 1.
4.0 WASTE HAULER PROGRAM
The Districts operate a Waste Hauler Station at Plant No. I in Fountain Valley for the
disposal of non-hazardous liquid wastes received by truck. Materials accepted include
biodegradable wastes from non-industrial sources such as septic tanks, cesspools,
chemical toilets, and grease traps. Non-hazardous industrial liquid waste is accepted only
on a case-by-case basis pending certification that the waste is non-hazardous and meets
the Districts' industrial discharge standards.
Fiscal Policy Staff Report
April 15, 1993
Page 3
Each waste hauler is issued a Districts permit and is given a Districts numbered
registration decal for trucks which have been inspected and registered with the Orange
County Health Care Agency. Currently the Districts have issued 60 permits to waste
haulers for the disposal of non-industrial waste. Decals have been issued to 140-150
trucks operated by the waste haulers (the number varies as waste hauling companies add
or retire trucks from their fleet). To recover costs for activities relating to the
administration of the program and treatment of waste discharges, the Districts charge
waste haulers disposal fees, permit fees and decal fees.
4.1 Waste Hauler Discharge Fees
The Fee Ordinance currently includes a disposal charge of $0.02 per gallon of truck
capacity for loads originating in-District and $0.04 per gallon for out-of-District loads.
The out-of-District fee has heretofore been arbitrarily set at double the in-District fee.
The fee is based on the maximum capacity of the truck because it is not feasible to
measure the actual volume in each truck. The trucks range in size from 300 gallons to
5,000 gallons.
Potential revisions to the waste hauler discharge fees are $0.035/gallon for waste
originating within the Districts and $0.11/ gallon for waste originating outside of the
Districts (see Table I). These changes reflect the costs of treating wastes, administering
.../ a manifest program for hauled wastes, and recovering capital costs for wastes originating
outside of the Districts as discussed below.
4.1.1 Treatment Costs
A review of the charge for treating and disposing of septage and other hauled wastes as
shown in the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Cost Allocation Study, James
M. Montgomery, 1993 revealed that the present charge for use of$0.02 per gallon should
be revised to $0.03' per gallon based on the volume and strength of wastes treated, and
the Districts' annual operations and maintenance, and capital cost allocations.
4.1.2 Manifest Costs
In addition, in accordance with Section 306.2.B of the Ordinance, a waste manifest,
which documents the sources of all wastes to be discharged to the Waste Hauler Station,
is being implemented for the first time in April 1993 to track discharges and enforce
permit conditions. Similar systems have been implemented at other local agencies, and
have been effective in tracking waste sources, and averting the discharge of hazardous
wastes.
As part of the manifest program, each truck coming into the Waste Hauler Station will
provide a completed manifest form prior to entrance. The manifest will be examined to
ensure that it is complete and legible, and that the waste loads are acceptable for
' Septage Is typically of much higher strength than domestic sewage. Organic loadings range from 30-
60 times greater.
Fiscal Policy Staff Report
April 15, 1993
Page 4
discharge. If any discrepancies are noted, the driver will be interviewed, and access will
be denied until proper documentation is produced. Manifests will be verified on a
random basis by confirmation with the generator of the wastes. This will be done by
telephone or by inspecting the generator's facility.
Based on the estimated number of manifests to be processed each year and the average
yearly discharge of wastes at the Waste Hauler Disposal Station, the cost of
administering the manifest program is $0.005 ('fi.c) per gallon.
4.1.3 Capital Recovery Charges - Waste Originating Out-of-District
Capital funding by users in the Districts' service area is provided in part through
annexation and connection fees. For waste brought to the Waste Hauler Station from
outside of the Districts' service area, a portion of these capital recovery costs are
captured through the $0.04/gallon discharge fee.
A review of the avoided costs has shown that out-of-Districts wastes discharged at the
Waste Hauler Disposal Station should be assessed a capital recovery charge of
$0.075/gallon. This charge assumes that capital costs for an out-of-District single family
home with a septic tank should be equivalent to the capital costs for a single family
home connected to the Districts' sewerage system. Thus the charge is based on an
equivalent annexation fee component and a connection fee component.
4.2 Waste Hauler Station Costs
The Waste Hauler Station's hours of operation are Monday through Friday, 5:30 AM to
5:30 PM. To meet special and emergency discharge conditions, the Districts have
developed procedures that allow waste haulers to discharge after regular operating
hours; however, to insure that hazardous wastes are not discharged during these times, it
is necessary to call in staff to sample, review manifests and identify waste loads.
To recover the costs of operating and manning the Station at times other than the
designated operating hours, two new charges should be considered as shown below:
■ An after hours charge of $85 per truck load for pre-arranged
discharges, such as the disposal of chemical toilet wastes
during festivals and sporting events; and
■ An after hours charge of $100 per truck load for emergency
discharges, such as septic tank back-ups or restaurant grease
trap overflows.
1
Fiscal Policy Staff Report
April 15, 1993
Page 5
..i 5.0 NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES
5.1 Violation Processing and Sampling Costs
Non-compliance sampling fees have been established in the Fee Ordinance for the
administrative, field, and analytical costs of re-sampling an industry found to be in
violation of its discharge requirements based on sampling conducted by the Districts or
by the industry. The fees are $200.00 for a minor violation' and $455.00 for a major
violation' plus laboratory costs. A review of the administrative and sampling costs
revealed that some adjustments should be made to reflect Districts' costs in processing
these violations. These revised fees are shown in Table II.
5.2 Analytical Costs
In conjunction with the non-compliance sampling fees, analytical costs have been
established in the Fee Ordinance. A review of the Districts' analytical costs reveals that
due to changes in procedures and equipment, there have been concomitant changes in
analytical costs for 24 previously identified constituents. In addition, there are charges
for 15 new constituents not previously listed. These have been added to account for
regulations which would limit their discharge. These charges are itemized in Table II.
' A minor violation is any discharge that exceeds a permit limit by less than 20%; a pH discharge less
than or equal to 5.0. but greater than 6.0; or a pH discharge greater than 12.0.
'A major violation is any discharge which exceeds a permit limit by more than 20%; or a pH discharge
less than 5.0.
r
Fiscal Policy Staff Report
April 15, 1993
Page 6
TABLE I
SOURCE CONTROL FEES, ADMINISTRATIVE FEES,
AND MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES
Proposed Charee Current Charge
Permit Fees:
A Class I Permit $335.00/yr $250.00/yr
B. Class II Permit $70.00/yr $33.33/yr
C. Class LII Permit No Change $75.00/3 yr
D. Special Purpose Discharge No Change $250.00/yr
Permit
E. Waste Hauler Discharge No Change $75.00/yr
Permit
F. Transportable Treatment No Change $250.00/yr
Unit
Waste Hauler Fees:
G. Permit Decal Initial Issue No Change $25.00
H. Permit Decal Replacement No Change $50.00
1. Entry Card Initial Issue No Change $50.00
J. Entry Card Replacement No Change $100.00
R. Charge for Use - Waste $0.035/gallon of $0.02/gallon of
Originating Within District truck capacity truck capacity
L. Charge for Use - Waste $0.11/gallon of $0.04/gallon of
Originating Outside District truck capacity truck capacity
M. After Hours Discharge - $85.00/load --
Prearranged
N. After Hours Discharge - $100.00/load ---
Emergency
Administrative/Processing Fees:
O. Districts Collection of Tax No Change $100.00/permit
Data
P. Districts Collection of Water No Change $100.00/permit
Consumption Data
Q. Appeal Hearing Filing Fee No Change $400.00
Fiscal Policy Staff Report
April 15, 1993
Page 7
r./
TABLE 11
NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES
Proposed Chary e Current Charee
Cost of Processing and Sampling $225.00/event $200.00/event
a Minor Violation
Cost of Processing and Sampling $500.00/yr $455.00/yr
a Major Violation
Costs for Analyses:
1. Heavy Metals - this one $19.00 $16.00
price includes analysis for
all the following:
Cadmium Lead
Chromium Silver
Copper Zinc
Nickel
2. Aluminum $19.00 ---
3. Antimony $19.00 ---
4. Arsenic $19.00 $16.00
.. 5. Gold $19.00 ---
6. Mercury $145.00 $130.00
7. Molybdenum $19.00 ---
8. Palladium $19.00 ---
9. Platinum $19.00 ---
10. Selenium $19.00 ---
11. Thallium $19.00 ---
12. 601/602 $152.00 $84.00
13. 604 $223.00 $153.00
14. 606 $254.00 $180.00
15. 608 $254.00 $193.00
16. 610 $37.00 ---
17. 612 $200.00
18. 624 $219.00 $225.00
19. 625 $445.00 $375.00
20. Ammonia Analysis as $26.00 $24.00
Nitrogen
Fiscal Policy Staff Report
April 15, 1993
Page 8
TABLE 11 CONTINUED
NON-COMPLIANCE SAMPLING FEES
Pr000sed CharEe Current Charee
21. Biochemical Oxygen $29.00 $24.00
Demand
22. BOD and Suspended $36.00 $30.00
Solids Analysis
23. Chemical Oxygen Demand $14.00 $12.00
24. Conductivity $7.00 $6.00
25. Cyanide (Amenable) $67.00 $48.00
26. Cyanide (Total) $42.00 $30.00
27. Dissolved Mineral Solids $13.00 $12.00
28. Gamma Radiation $115.00 ---
Determination
29. Gross Alpha and Beta $50.00 ---
Determination `.
30. Tritium Determination $50.00 ---
31. Grease and Oil (Hexane $79.00 $73.00
Soluble Matter)
32. Grease and Oil (Mineral $79.00 $73.00
Partition)
33. Total Organic Nitrogen $26.00 $24.00
34. pH $7.00 $7.00
35. Phenol $55.00 $73.00
36. Suspended Solids (Total) $7.00 $6.00
37. Suspended Solids (Total $14.00 $12.00
and Volatile)
38. Total Dissolved Solids $9.00 --
39. Total Sulfides $20.00 ---
COUNTY SANRATION DISTRICT
N ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
, April 7, 1993 PO eo G12�E
iWMUN Va Y.MWOMu ez)zeblz
a1n9A24411
STAFF REPORT
Reauest for Consideration of Reduced Connection Fees for Park
Stanton Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton
The District has received the attached communications from Jan Development Co.,
and Director Sal Sapien, Chairman of Sanitation District No. 3, requesting
consideration of a reduction in connection fees for a large Senior Citizen
Apartment Project within the City of Stanton.
The project includes 335 affordable senior citizen apartments located on Katella
Avenue, just west of Beach Boulevard. Chairman Sapien points out that this is a
much needed project to serve the senior population. The units range from 450
square feet to 750 square feet plus common areas. Under the Districts' ordinance,
the connection fee would be $2,350 per unit or $787,250 for the project. The
City of Stanton would receive five percent of this amount, $39,362.50, which is
the standard provision for all cities for administering the District's connection fee
ordinance.
The District has two connection fee rates. The $2,350 residential development fee
applies to dwelling units. Non-residential development is charged a fee of $470 per
thousand square feet (minimum $2,350). The square footage area fees are used
on industrial and commercial facilities which generally have lower sewage flows per
thousand square feet than residential.
Connection fees are collected to support the construction of the facilities necessary
to serve new development. Those facilities include the large trunk sewers which
collect sewage from the cities and convey it to the treatment plants, the treatment
works, and facilities for the disposal of sewage treatment by-products and disposal
of the treated effluent. The current connection fee of $2,350 per unit, which has
not been raised for two years, is an important component of the Districts' overall
financing program for capital expansion construction. The only other source of
funds for facilities improvements is borrowing in the municipal securities market.
The $2,350 per unit does not meet the Districts' capital needs; consequently, in
recent years, the Districts have issued certificates of participation totaling nearly
$400 million for additional funding of sewerage system improvements and
replacements. The certificates are repaid by annual property taxes and user
charges collected on the property tax bill.
I
Staff Report
April 7, 1993
Page Two
The issue of totally equitable connection fees is a difficult one with no easy
answers. For example, one home may be occupied by a single occupant, while the
next door house could have five occupants. It could be argued that the connection
fees for the single occupant house, as well as the annual user fee, should be lower;
however, the occupancy could change tomorrow. The same is true of a smaller
apartment versus a larger apartment.
Conversely, an argument can be made that the size of a dwelling is somewhat
independent of the amount of flow received by the sewage system. Sewers must
be designed and constructed for peak flows. Since these peak flows are somewhat
independent of individual sewage discharge, an equal connection fee may be
appropriate. The same is true of most of the components of the treatment and
disposal facilities which again are designed and constructed for peak conditions.
The cost of treating the sewage, however, is very dependent on the amount and
strength of the sewage received. This cost is the operations and maintenance
expenses, which are not funded through the capital connection fee charge. The
operations and maintenance charges are funded largely through the annual user fee
and that portion of the one-percent basic property tax levy received by the
Districts. Smaller apartments pay less property tax and multiple family dwelling
units pay a lower annual user fee than a single family dwelling.
Some believe that a senior citizen, a low income senior citizen, or low income units
in general should receive a lower connection fee. It may be that such a fee
reduction is appropriate and, if the Directors concur, it is recommended that staff
be directed to do a study and make recommendations. If a study is undertaken, it
would be appropriate to consider certain guidelines. First, since the cities collect
our connection fees, and retain a portion thereof, should a request for a fee
adjustment be made by the governing board of the agency requesting the
connection fee reduction? Should the agency requesting the reduction be required
to give up an equivalent portion of the five percent collection fee which they now
receive? Should the reduction request be considered on a case-by-case basis or
should the entire connection fee schedule be restructed? If restructured, how
many different categories should be considered?
The Districts' connection fee for any residential project is one of many fees
charged. If a request for a lower rate is going to be considered and/or approved,
should it be conditional on all fees charged on that development by the agency
agreeing to use the same reduction factor?
Staff Report
April 7, 1993
Page Three
In summary, the issue of totally equitable capital connection fees, annual user fees,
and most other fees is most difficult, at best. To the extent practicable, the
Districts' fees are based on sound guidelines and principles as well as pragmatic
considerations. Reduction in the collection of one fee will shift recovery of the loss
to another fee and source. If cost shifting is appropriate, guidelines should be
incorporated to ensure that fees for all services also share in the burden. Requests
for fee adjustments are received periodically. To date none have been granted by
the Boards.
TMD:jt
wwoc�cn-W wta,..,t
Attachments (2)
March 18, 1993
Wayne Sylvester, General Manages
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
Re: Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartment Project
Dear Mr. Sylvester.
The purpose of this letter is seek consideration of a reduction of the connection fee structure for
the above project.
Park Stanton Place which will commence construction within 120 days, is designed as a 335 unit
affordable Senior Citizen Apatmem Project, to be located on Karelia Avenue in the City of
Stanton. The project will be of significant benefit to the City of Stanton, and the County of
Orange as a whoie since it will provide much-needed housing for our growing Senior population.
I00% of the units will be affordable, and 30 units will be reserved for very low income Seniors.
The project will allow Stanton to comply with its obligations pursuant to the Regional Housing
Needs Assessment as well as the housing goals in the General Plan.
it appears to me that there should be some distinction made between normal residential dwelling
units which are charged a connection fee of$2,350, and a Senior Project such as Park Stanton
Place. 73 of the units are oniv 450 square feet, 238 units are only 550 square feet, and the
remaining 28 units are a maximum of 750 square feet The size of the units, as well as the
restriction of the units to occ.:pancy by Senior Citizens only would indicate to me that they are
likely to have much less of an impact to the wastewater treatment facilities of the Districts than
a single family dwelling unit. Accordingly, it would seem appropriate for the Districts to adopt
a fee structure that accounts for these types of dwelling units.
I am reaueseng that this maser be placed on the District No. 3 Board of Directors Meeting for
April la. 1993.
sincerely,-
L
Sal Sapien
Chairman
District No. 3
Sanitation Districts of Orange County
J�JDEVELOPMENT CO .
8383 WILSHIRE BLVD.. SUITE 634. BEVERLY HILLS. CA 90211
12131 653 6677
March 17 , 1993
Mr. Wayne Sylvester
General Manager
Orange County Sanitation Department
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Ca. 92728-8127
RE: PARR STANTON SENIORS APARTMENTS
7622 KATELLA AVENUE
STANTON, CA.
Dear Mr. Sylvester:
We are writing to request your consideration in re-classifying our
project's designation to determine the appropriate Orange county
Sanitation Departments Connection Fee. The project cannot afford
the current inappropriate residential classification.
The reason the proposed project requires this re-classification is
because: (1) the project is loot Senior Citizen, which does not _
place such a burden on the sewer system, with no families or
children present; (2) the project is a Low-Income project and
cannot economically support a very high connection fee; (3) each
unit is very small in size (approximately 500 square feet) and will
not place the same burden as residential households on the sewer
system; (4) the project is sorely needed in this community and is
not feasible without your consideration.
Please review whether a more appropriate designation might not be
commercial or something other than residential, to more accurately
reflect the nature of this particular project.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Very truly y/ours,��,
./�YLLlJ(/ /<C I l
Edward M. Czuker)
Vice President
EMC/cmw
cc: File
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
el ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10e Ews AVENUE
April 15, 1993 oo.9ox9,2]
/ Y FWMPIN VALLEY,CP2F9XNIP 92729-9127
pt<19622P11
STAFF REPORT
PROPOSED PRIDE AWARDS
During the past few months, several Personal Responsibility in Daily Effort
(PRIDE) proposals have been evaluated. Following is a summary of those
safety or cost-saving proposals that staff recommends for certificates and
cash awards, in accordance with the Board-approved PRIDE program. Seven
of these ten PRIDE proposals are estimated to save the Districts
approximately $62,035 annually, while the other three are safety
improvements. The ten recommended awards total $4,856.30.
PRIDE No. 176 - Valve Stem View Port
This proposal will extend the life of stem valves, stems and valve seats by
creating a view port to aid an operator when opening and closing the valve
to ensure it is not overtorqued. The proposed award for this suggestion is
10% of the first year's savings, or $873.60.
PRIDE No. 226 - Jacking Tool
This suggestion proposes designing a "Jacking Tool" to be attached to high
rate mixing pumps to aid in deragging of the pumps, thereby providing
greater safety for the worker and less damage to the pumps during
maintenance. An award of $127.00, or 10% of the first year's savings is
proposed.
PRIDE No. 240 - Super Shredder Transoort Fixture
This suggestion proposes a safer method for moving the shredder in order to
perform maintenance on it by fabricating a fixture or rack for this purpose.
The suggestion improves safety and the proposed award is $100.
.J
i,
Proposed PRIDE Awards
Page 2
April 15, 1993
PRIDE No. 242 - High Temp Oven Cleaning
Using a high temperature oven to clean laboratory glassware results in more
effective, efficient and economical cleaning and eliminates the release of all
volatile solvents to the air. The first year's savings are estimated to be
$14,000 and the cash award for this suggestion is $1,400.00
PRIDE No. 259 - Pump Packing Protection
This suggestion recommends that sensors be placed on various plant process
pumps which will shut down the pumps in the event of a loss of pressure or
water. The proposal should have the result of less pump wear, and
therefore maintenance, and the minimum of $100.00 is proposed for a cash
award.
PRIDE No. 264 - Reinformed Sludge Judge
This suggestion increases the life span of a "Sludge Judge" at the Dissolved
Air Floatation Units by modifying the couplings. This life extension results in
an estimated $1 ,406.00 annual savings. The proposed cash award for this
suggestion is $140.60.
PRIDE No. 265 - Simple Activated Sludge Reactor Ventilation
This suggestion recommends a procedural change that reduces labor and
electrical costs associated with taking an Activated Sludge Reactor out of
service. Using a smaller fan for ventilating through a high pressure relief
valve results in an estimated annual savings of $1 ,787.00 over the current
method. The cash award for this suggestion is 10% or $178.70.
PRIDE No. 267 - Condensate U-Tube Drain Traps
This proposal recommends installation of an automatic U-tube or water leg
type piping system that would replace manually operated drain valves on the
low pressure digester gas system for the purpose of draining water. This
Proposed PRIDE Awards
Page 3
April 15, 1993
change significantly reduces the labor that is required to perform the
function manually with a very low material and installation cost. Staff
estimates the first year's savings to be in excess of $30,000.00, and the
maximum PRIDE award of $1,500.00 is proposed.
PRIDE No. 268 - Grit Drain Flushing System
This suggestion proposes a modification to the grit withdrawal drain lines at
the Headworks because of numerous, costly problems with the lines
becoming plugged. This recommendation has an estimated net annual
savings of $3,364.00 with 10%, or $336.40, being recommended for a
cash award.
PRIDE No. 296 - Chemical Soill Isolation
This suggestion recommends installation of hose winders with ropes and
J flags to easily and quickly isolate an area that may be affected by a chemical
spill. Staff proposes a $100.00 award for this safety suggestion.
GGS:Ic
REF:J:\WPDOC\FPC.MTG\PRIDE94.93
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
108"ELLI9 AVENUE
PO BOX 8127
FWMAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92729-8127
March 29, 1993 014)992-2411
STAFF REPORT
1993 SUMMER WORK PROGRAM
For several years, the Directors have authorized a Summer Work
Program for reducing the backlog of painting, groundskeeping and
general clean-up work around the treatment plant facilities.
Attached are listings of typical work assignments. This type of
work can best be accomplished in the summer because the weather
is suitable and the temporary help (mostly students) is more
readily available during those months.
Last year the Boards authorized a maximum of 37 Part-Time
Assistant positions, working for a flat fee of $6.00 per hour.
The total cost budgeted was not to exceed $250, 000.00, including
labor, materials and supplies.
This year we request authorization to hire a maximum of 38
people; and also request authorization for up to 8 temporary
upgrades at a 5.5% salary rate increase for those existing full-
time maintenance employees to be designated as temporary crew
leaders, as in the past. It is proposed that the basic salary
rate for the Part-Time Assistants be $6.00 per hour and the
maximum expenditure for the entire program not exceed
$225,000. 00, including labor, materials and supplies. Staff
estimates that implementation of this project will save
approximately $150,000 per year.
Anticipated costs from May 24, 1993 through September 24, 1993,
and crew assignments, are summarized as follows:
Salaries & Wages $150,000.00
Materials & Supplies 75,000.00
Total $225,000.00
PLANT NO. 1 PLANT NO. 2 PUMP STATIONS TOTAL
1 Warehouse Helper 1 Warehouse Helper
10 Painters/2 Crews 15 Painters/3 Crews 25 Painters/5 Crews
4 Grounds /1 Crew 4 Grounds /1 Crew 8 Grounds /2 Crews
4 Helpers/l Crew 4 Helpers/ 1 Crew
15 Total 19 Total 4 Total 38 Total
r
1
PLANT NO. 1 SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE
GROUNDS CREW
1. Center of Plant
a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds.
2 . North Side Tree Row on Ellis
a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds.
3. Trees (Exit Road)
a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds.
4 . West Tree Row (Ward) Factory 21
a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds.
5. East Tree Row (Next to River)
a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds.
PLANT NO. 1 SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE
TUNNEL PAINT AND CLEAN-UP CREWS
1. Diversion Structure
a. Gate Stands
b. Piping and Equipment
2. Plant Tunnels
a. Clean
b. Paint
3 . Sedimentation Basins
a. Piping and Drive Motors
b. Walkways
C. Final Basin Piping, Pumps, etc.
4 . Aeration Basins
a. Piping on Landing
b. Exposed Tunnel Piping
PUMP STATION SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE
GROUND, PAINT AND CLEAN-UP CREW
1. Structures - Exterior
a. Clean
b. Paint, as necessary
2. Structures - Interior
a. Clean
b. Paint, as necessary
3 . Grounds
a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds
PLANT NO. 2 SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE
GROUND CREWS
1. Tree Row - North End (Behind Nursery)
a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds.
2 . Tree Row - West Side (Brookhurst)
a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds.
3 . Tree Row - South End (Behind Warehouse and Sample Building)
a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds.
4 . Tree Row - East Side (River Bed)
a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds.
5. Sludge Bed Area and Truck Wash
a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds.
6. Center of Plant (Basins, Digesters, Buildings, etc. )
a. Weed, trim, clean and spray for weeds.
7 . Right-of-Way (To Adams)
PLANT NO. 2 SUMMER PROGRAM WORK SCHEDULE
TUNNEL PAINT AND CLEAN-UP CREWS
1. Oxygen Plant (Paint as Needed)
a. Cold Boxes, LOX Tanks
b. Piping and Equipment
2 . Reactor Basins and Final Basins (Paint as Needed)
a. Mixers and Piping
b. Piping, Pumps and Motors
3 . Sedimentation Basins (Paint as Needed)
a. Pump Rooms
b. Piping and Pumps
4 . Digesters (Paint)
a. Piping
b. Pump Rooms
5. Odor Control Equipment (Paint)
a. Piping, Pumps, Motors
6. Buildings
a. Clean
b. Paint as Needed
O. Tunnels
a. Clean
b. Paint Piping as Needed
i
AN OWNER-CONTROLLED
WRAP-UP INSURANCE PROGRAM
FOR
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Presented By
Robert F. Driver Associates
April 7, 1993
[ t 1 1 1 I t 1 t ( ( L t 1 E ! l
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
What is Wrap-Up Insurance? 3
Wrap-up: The Advantages 5
Expected Cost Savings 7
Wrap-up Insurance Companies 10
Management of a Successful Wrap-up Program 11
Public Entity Wrap-ups - In Process and Completed 16
First Steps to Forming a Wrap-up Program 18
APPENDICES
• Advantages of Wrap-up Insurance Programs 20
• Common Objections and Responses 23
• Legislative Approval 27
0 § 4420 Unfair and Coercive Insurance Requirements 28
WHAT IS WRAP-UP INSURANCE?
An "Owner-Controlled" Insurance Program is a centralized and
coordinated insurance and loss prevention program that provides
coverages for job-site construction risk for all participating parties.
3
WRAP-UP COVERAGES
INCLUDE:
• WORKERS' COMPENSATION
• GENERAL LIABILITY
• EXCESS LIABILITY
• EXCESS AUTOMOBILE
• PROJECT ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
• DESIGN PROFESSIONALS ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
4
WRAP-UP ADVANTAGES
• ASSURES PROTECTION OF OWNERS ASSETS
• INSURANCE PREMIUM DIVIDENDS RETURNED TO OWNER
• PROVIDES SUBSTANTIAL COST SAVINGS
• IMPROVED PUBLIC RELATIONS
• EFFICIENT CLAIMS HANDLING
5
I l - l I I l I [ [ 1
MORE ADVANTAGES
• COORDINATED LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM
• COORDINATED CLAIMS MANAGEMENT
• MINIMIZATION OF INTER-CONTRACTOR
(OR INTER-INSURANCE) LAWSUITS
• EDUCATION AND TRAINING
• IMPROVED OWNER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
• ELIMINATION OF DUPLICATE COVERAGES
6
t t f Q l t f 1
EXPECTED COST SAVINGS
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Projected Insurance Costs * $80000,000 ,
Less Volume Purchase Discount (5%) ( 400,000)2
Less Contractor/Subcontractor Markups (12%) ( 960,000)3
Historical Water Treatment Plant Dividend (12.6%) (1,008,000)°
Total Estimated Insurance Program Cost $5,632,000
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total Insurance Cost Savings (30% of
Projected Insurance Costs) $2,3689000
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Estimated Wrap-up Premium $6,640,0005
* Based on $200,000,000 in project contracts
7
NOTES ON EXPECTED COST SAVINGS
' Projected Insurance Costs are estimated at 4% based on 3 year Capital
Improvements budget of $200,000,000. Underwriters estimate insurance
costs at between 3% to 5% of total contract value. Underwriters
contacted for this information include Argonaut, CIGNA, Home and
National Union.
z Our experience indicates that volume purchase of insurance can provide
insureds with a discount on overall premium. As evidenced by the recent
implementation of the CSDOC Master Course of Construction Program,
savings as high as 30% is possible.
' Contractor and subcontractors often markup insurance premiums by
adding overhead or administrators changes. This information was
provided by SVRDRUP of Irvine, a construction management firm with
national experience.
The Historical Water Treatment Plant dividend of 12.6% was provided
by Argonaut Insurance Company. Their average dividend on all types of
wrap-ups is 27.4%. CSDOC's actual wrap-up dividend may differ due to
actual loss experience.
8
t t [ I t t t t ` t i @ t t t i k 1
5 Premiums will be paid on a project by project basis. Dividends are
typically calculated at strategic points throughout the term of the contract
with successive calculations continuing after the end of the policy term.
Dividends can be negotiated as a reduction in premium paid at inception
of the program. This estimate does not include a reduction.
The Robert F. Driver Associates compensation is yet to be negotiated.
Standard commissions on Wrap-up Programs are approximately 5.7%.
It would not be reasonable for Driver to assume a commission level of
5.7% without consideration of a good portion of the funds being utilized
for services necessary to support the administrative and engineering costs
associated with a wrap-up.
9
t [ t t a [ t t t t t t t t t t [
WRAP—UP INSURANCE COMPANIES
Insurance Company Best's Guide Rating California Status
Argonaut Insurance A+, Superior; Class IX, Admitted
Company Policyholders' Surplus of
$250,000,000 to
$500900%000
National Union Insurance A+ + , Superior; Class XV, Admitted
Company Policyholders' Surplus of
$2,000,000,000 or more
Home Insurance Company A-, Excellent; Class XV, Admitted
Policyholders' Surplus of
$750,000,000 to
$1,000,000,000
CIGNA Insurance Company A-, Excellent; Class XIV, Admitted
Policyholders' Surplus of
$1,500,000,000 to
$2,000,000,000
10
e e [ t [ [ t t t ` t t t t e [ [ t
l
MANAGEMENT OF A SUCCESSFUL
WRAP-UP PROGRAM
Key assignments of responsibility for:
• Insurance Broker
• Risk Management Staff
• Safety Management
• Insurance Carriers
11
e e e e e e e f e e e e e e e e e
INSURANCE BROKER RESPONSIBILITIES:
• Underwriting and completion of data
• Assist in development of project insurance manual
• Attend all preconstruction meetings
• Enroll new contractors/subcontractors
• Issue policies and certificates
• Monitor payroll reporting
• Oversee claims administration
• Coordinate and develop loss control programs
• Provide assistance to Risk Management as needed
12
a t t I a t t t t t t t t a t t
RISK MANAGEMENT STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES:
• Creating annual project goals
• Reviewing all requests for proposals, contracts, leases
• Appraising contractor's insurance certificates for coverage not included in
wrap-up
• Periodically reviewing project blueprints to provide recommendations
• Identify problem areas to designers, contractors engineers before and during
construction
• Produce reports to update and inform management of wrap-up program status,
problems and completed goals
13
l
SAFETY MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES:
• All parties must be involved
• Development of Safety Manual and Employee Handbook
• Training for contractors and employees
• Safety Inspections
• Safety Reports
14
[ [ l 1 [ I I I I I I I I I 1 I I
INSURANCE CARRIERS RESPONSIBILTTIES:
• Background and familiarity with wrap-up insurance
• Examination and underwriting of risk
• On-site visits
• Regular meetings with Robert F. Driver Associates and CSDOC
• Loss prevention services
• Claims services
• Provide extensive support to Safety Management Program
15
I 1 1 1 ( l ( 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 t
PUBLIC ENTITY WRAP-UPS
Entity Project Status
Atlanta (MARTA) Rapid Transit Completed
Baltimore (MTA) Rapid Transit In Process
City of Fresno Wastewater Treatment Seeking Legislative
Approval
Los Angeles County
Transportation Commission Rapid Transit Completed Two In Process
Metropolitan Washington
Airport Authority Airport In Process
County of Riverside Hospital Seeking Legislative
Approval
County of San Bernardino Hospital Seeking Legislative
Approval
16
Entity PrQeec Status
City of San Diego Wastewater Treatment Seeking Legislative
Approval
San Francisco (BART) Rapid Transit Completed Two
In Process on Third
17
t t< [ [ [ [ t [ [ [ [ [ t [ [ [ [
FIRST STEPS TO FORMING A WRAP-UP
1. Management and Joint Boards Approval of Program and Concept
2. Legislative Authorization
18
APPENDICES `
19
t [ t f f I t C 1 ( f & l E ( � ' l
ADVANTAGES OF WRAP-UP INSURANCE PROGRAM
There are significant advantages in instituting a wrap-up insurance program for large scale construction projects.
Standardization of Contractor's Insurance.
W tap-ups eliminate conflicting insurance provisions, remove overlapping policies and close coverage "gaps." Wrap-ups also provide
the flexibility to write special coverages to meet specific needs of the owner.
Obtaininr Hieher Limits.
Contractors typically purchase $2 - $10 million in general liability coverage. These limits may not adequately pay for major
accidents. Under an owner controlled insurance program an owner can purchase adequate limits to meet their perceived exposures
without eliminating competitive bids.
Specific Proiect Limitations.
An owner need not worry about the contractor's policy being eroded by a major accident that happens while the contractor is working
for another owner/project. '
Elimination of need to verify every policy provided by contractors.
This process is usually performed through the customary exchange of insurance certificates and can be very time consuming.
Eliminating this requirement keeps the project moving, the selection process is not delayed by insurance verification.
Improved Construction Site Safety.
Safety is the most important aspect of any wrap-up program. A pro-active, successful program requires everyone's participation and
safety is no exception - it is everyone's responsibility.
20
fl I l [ I I [ t I t `" I I. t I
Provide a coordinated aooroach to chums manaeement.
A wrap-up program permits the use of one agency to provide all of the on-site claims administration. This simplifies the process
and eliminates the conflicts which arise when multiple insurance carriers each share an insurable interest in one claim. A wrap-up
eliminates this needless delay.
Minimize infer-contractor lawsuits.
Construction work can involve very hazardous activities such as blasting, demolition and excavation, inherent dangers that make any
major construction project a natural and prolific breeding ground for litigation. Consolidating the insurance protection into one set
of policies to cover all of the insureds helps eliminate the endless possibilities for cross-claims among the engineers, architects,
contractors and subcontractors.
Price
A wrap-up program reduces cost in the following ways:
Generates volume discounts.
It is realistic to expect significant savings under a wrap-up approach through a reduction of administrative costs from multiple
policies. Other projects have reported savings between 25 percent and 37 percent over the traditional approach of insurance
placement.
Offers ooaortunitles for dividends as a result of pod loss ¢Whence.
Any dividends or return premiums due to good loss experience are returned to the owner versus the contractor; thus the owner's costs
are reduced even further.
21
F,liminates contractor's mark-up on insurance premiums.
The cost is reduced by direct purchase of the liability, workers' compensation and builder's risk policies rather than reimbursing the
contractors through overhead expenses.
Enhances cash flow.
The reserve requirements under the workers' compensation insurance policies can be met by negotiating a letter of credit. This allows
the organization to maximize its investment earnings.
Public Relations
Wrap-ups enhance public relations by the following ways:
Expediting claim payment to injured Parties.
The purchaser of the wrap-up insurance policies controls the insurance carrier, the claims adjusters and any other party with an
insurable interest. If someone is not paid, the owner knows it and can control its image by managing the adjusting activities,
especially with prompt claims payment.
Encouraging/supporting minority business enterprises.
Many minority or small contractors have difficulty purchasing all or part of the insurance required to bid on construction contracts.
Wrap-ups eliminate the cost and unavailability of insurance as a "structural barrier."
22
fl l [ l [ [ fl [ I 1`` " [ [ [ [ I [ I C [
OBJECTIONS/RESPONSES TO INSTITUTING A WRAP-UP PROGRAM
When you consider instituting a wrap-up insurance program, as with anything new, involved parties will invariably have objections
or concerns. Some common objections and concerns are discussed below:
Disruption of Contractor's Insurance.
Contractors already provide workers' compensation covemee.
Traditionally, contractors provide minimum or limited coverage for workers' compensation and employers' liability. By default, it
is possible that the owner will become liable for any uninsured contractor. A wrap-up program provides adequate coverage for all
insured parties.
Contractors are currently Payine for their coveraee.
A wrap-up does not require duplicate reporting or payment. The payroll hours from the wrap-up program are not reported to the
contractor's primary insurance carrier and the premium for the program is paid by the owner. The contractors do not incur any
additional cost.
Chaneine the workers' compensation procedure is confusine.
The contractors complain that their employees already know how to report injuries/accidents through their procedures. The wrap-up
requires a new workers' compensation insurance carrier with different procedures, which can be confusing to their employees. In
reality, each construction site still has the same rules: the employee reports the injury to a supervisor, gets a form from the on-site
trailer, goes to the nearest treating facility and returns to work when released from treatment. From the worker's point of view,
nothing has changed. The owner, however, has controlled the claim activity and the cost by standardizing where and how medical
treatment is obtained.
23
l
Administrative burden is too great.
When the contract is issued to the prime contractor, that firm and each subcontractor has a set period of time (normally 2 weeks)
to complete and return enrollment forms to the insurance administrator. During construction, the contractors may be required to
complete other forms, such as monthly reports and claim forms, but these forms duplicate similar reporting required by the
contractor's current insurer. Under a wrap-up program each contractor receives an "Insurance Manual" which contains instructions
on completing all forms (see sample document, Appendix I).
Contractors do not understand wrap-ups.
This has an easy cure: early, frequent and complete communications. Once the contractors understand how the program benefits
them, the objections disappear.
Wrap-ups still require the contractors to maintain their own insurance.
True. Even under a wrap-up, to protect the owner, every contractor must still provide certificates of insurance to ensure there is
off-site coverage. There is no additional cost to the contractor under this requirement unless the exposure (such as automobile
liability) is not provided under the wrap-up program. Then, and only then, the owner reimburses the contractor for the additional
coverage related to the project based on a percentage of the verified premium. No one should cancel a policy; the contractors need
their own insurance for other contracted work.
Vague Savinz .
Cost of insurance is buik into the contractor's overhead.
It is hard to prove contractors have removed all of their insurance costs from their bid, but the bidding competition itself will
eliminate the majority of the cost. The procurement process should require the contractor to bid with and without insurance costs
as a line item. Expected figures can be compared to national standards; the cost range will be less for wrap-ups.
24
t I t l t I t I t t``' I t t I t I I ` ( l
Difficaft to predict the Adare.
What if the project doesn't continue, the plans change, the insurance carrier cancels the policy or is not there to write the insurance?
People argue it is easier to change all of these events when the contractors are responsible for providing their own insurance. While
it may be easier for the owner to follow the traditional approach where all of the work involved in obtaining the project insurance
is transferred to the contractors, still the same events could happen regardless of the method employed to provide insurance.
Insurance Market Commitment.
Limited number of carriers willing to write wma-ups.
There are specialty areas as in any field. The important point is the quality of the carriers. Those currently involved in wrap-up
insurance are top-rated carriers.
Insurance carrier could become insolvent.
The contractors assume the same risk with their policies; however, if a carrier became insolvent the contractor might not have the
resources to expeditiously find another qualified carrier. By operating a wrap-up, the owner already has information on other carriers
willing to underwrite the exposure.
Fear that an insurance carrier would cancel the araiect.
Most contractors' insurance policies cover one year at a time. Wrap-up's, because they are project insurance, can be written for
longer period of time such as three to five years. Also the policy can be a non-cancelable policy due to the volume and length of
commitment.
25
e e t t t I t t e t e [ [ e I t t
Administrative Burden.
Increased requirement for meetings. gathering of data.
It is true that this requirement imposes a burden, but it is a positive addition: Wrap-ups provide more control and more useful
information than might otherwise be captured and thus contribute to the overall efficiency and success of the project.
Demands on time. attention and resources.
Any major project needs more personnel, paperwork, computers and space for the owner; with a wrap-up program, much of the work
associated with the procurement of insurance is transferred from the contractors to the owner. However, arguably, the owner is not
increasing work as much as substituting work involved with reviewing contractor's coverage and claim problems for control up front.
Management e"erdse needed.
One of the benefits of wrap-up programs is the transferability of documents and information. When one examines the documentation
from several major wmp-ups that have been in effect during the past 15 years, one discovers that a given document has probably
been duplicated, slightly modified and reused by other entities--over and over again. A start-up program can use the documents and
procedures already developed at other projects. Alternative resources, such as the insurance brokers or carriers, also can be called
on to help perform the administrative work.
Disincentive for Loss Control
Zack ofperforamce incentive.
Critics claim that without penalties or claim deductibles, contractors do not have any incentive to operate safely. To counter this
impression, it is necessary to reward the positive. A strong program with incentives can be created and supplemented by use of
deductibles.
26
I [ I I l I I I I (' I I I I I I I , l
C
LEGISLATIVE APPROVAL
Due to the existence of Government Code 4420, specifically Chapter 6 "Unfair and Coercive Insurance Requirements", it is necessary
for public entities to obtain Legislative exception to Code 4420 to institute an Owner Controlled Insurance Program.
The pertinent portion of Code 4420 is attached at the end of this section. You will note that there has been legislative exception made
for three large mass transit projects in the state, namely, Bay Area Rapid Transit, Southern California Rapid Transit District and
Santa Clara County.
It is not necessary that your entity initiate specific separate legislation to accomplish a change in Code 4420, rather the change can
be made by introducing a rider to a pending bill. We suggest the Districts General Counsel make contact with the local legislative
representative who is sympathetic to the construction you plan and work with that legislator to add pertinent exception wording to
a pending bill.
Your legislative representative and General Counsel can provide input for specific wording, but the following is offered as a
suggestion:
"State Government Code 4420, Chapter 6 shall not apply to construction and/or renovation of any Wastewater
Treatment projects for counties with a population over 200,000."
The reasons for this exception can be laid out as you desire but primarily the reasons are:
1. Improved safety of the construction site
2. Improved control of insurance costs associated with the project, etc.
This legislative approval should be addressed prior to completion of construction bid documents in order that design of insurance
wording in the bid documents can be described and addressed properly.
27
1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 `" 1 1 1 1 1 1 [ ` F 1
CHAPTER 6. UNFAIR AND COERCIVE INSURANCE REQUIROV M
§ 4420. Bids on public buildings or construction contracts; applicability of chapter; public agency, defined
No officer or employee of this state, or of any public agency or of any public authority, and no person acting or
purporting to act on behalf of any officer, employee, or public agency or authority, except a public agency or authority created
pursuant to agreement or compact with another state, shall, with respect to any public building or construction contract which
is about to be or which has been competitively bid, require the bidder to make application to, or furnish financial data to. or
to obtain or procure any suM bond or contract of insurance §pacified in connection with the contract. or specified by any
law, ordinance, or regulation, from, a particular surety or insurance com ag y. agent or broker. No officer or employee, or
person, firm, or corporation acting or purporting to act on behalf of ally officer or employee, shall negotiate, make application
for, obtain, or procure any such surety bond or contract of insurance (except contracts of insurance for builder's risk or
owner's protective liability) which can be obtained or procured by the bidder, contractor, or subcontractor.
This chapter shall not apply to any project under design or construction on August 4, 1967, by or on behalf of a public
agency or authority if Ig agency or authority was then engaged in insurance activity with respect to the project that otherwise
would be prohibited by this chapter.
This chapter shall not apply to the construction of any exclusive public mass transit guideway project in any county
with a population exceeding 6,000,000, or in the County of Santa Clara, or in the City and County of San Francisco. or any
exclusive tmblic mass transit guideway prpject undertaken by the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit BARTI District.
As used in this section, "public agency" means any city, county, city and county, district, municipal or public
corporation, or any agency or instrumentality thereof.
(Amended by Stats.1981, c. 481, p. 1824, § 1; Stats.1984, c. 141; § 1, eff. May 31 1984; Stats.1989, c. 99, § 1.)
Historical Note
1984 Legislation
Section 2 of Stats.1984, c. 141, provides: "The Legislature finds that due to the unique circumstances
concerning the construction of a light rail system in the county of Santa
Clara a general statute cannot be made applicable."
Additions in text are indicated by underline.
28
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
April 21, 1993 tOIWI PD.eLLIS WX812pNllF
"'✓ STAFF REPORT wuxrux vau14lg62-N" 9272e-9127
p 141998�8411
COUNTY OF ORANGE 800 MHz SYSTEM
AND ITS IMPACT ON CSDOC
TWO-WAY RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
Summary
The Districts benefit from the use of a two-way radio system that enables staff to
communicate vital information necessary in the day-to-day operation of our two
wastewater treatment plants and the collection systems, as well as help in the
administration of the industrial source control program and the management of the master
planned construction program. A recent inquiry by the Boards of Directors raised the
issue of the new 800 MHz radio system being developed by the County of Orange. This
report presents a detailed examination of the issues and presents staffs conclusions and
recommendations to the Directors for their consideration.
The report begins with a background summary of the history of the Districts' radio use
and its present inventory and valuation. The discussion portion of the report clarifies the
./ issues involved regarding the 800 MHz radio system, covering pending rule changes from
the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), technical issues, public response and
the response of special interest groups, and the status of the County's efforts to institute
an 800 MHz system as a response to the FCC's changes. The discussion concludes with
a summary of the features of the County's new system and its potential impact on the
Districts. This report then concludes with staffs conclusions and recommendations.
Background
In 1970 the Districts obtained a license from the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC)to operate a two-way radio system in the Private Land Mobile Radio Services band
according to Part 90 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Title R7, Telecommunications.
This license provided the Districts permission to operate at 453.375 MHz (receive) and
458.375 MHz (transmit) in repeater mode with a call sign of KTC872. This radio system
has enabled the Districts staff to benefit from the ability to communicate with operators
at treatment structures throughout both plants, with inspectors in the field, as well as
maintenance personnel at various locations throughout the Districts' far-reaching
collection system. The radio units used include, a base station, mobile radios installed
in cars, trucks, vans and other vehicles, portable hand-held units, and sub-base station
1
April 21, 1993
desk sets in certain administrative offices. In addition to the normal radio traffic, the staff
also uses these frequencies for a voice paging system. This enables staff wearing these
pagers to be paged anywhere within the Districts' service area. The present inventory
of equipment includes the following:
EXISTING DISTRICTS' TWO-WAY RADIO SYSTEM
uantit Equipment Type Approx. Cost to Replabe
Unit Total
125 Mobile radios $2,800 $350,000
150 Portable radios $1.500 $225,000
25 Desk sets $700 $ 17,500
2 Transmitter & Base stations $24.000 $ 48,000
(one spare)
1 Paging encoder & console $1,500 $ 1,500
2 Repeaters (one spare) $15,000 $30,000
2 Antenna (one spare) $1,000 $ 2,000
1 Recording monitor $6,944 $ 6944
300 Pagers $300 $90:000
TOTAL $770.944
The Districts' radio system has been in constant use for 23 years. The repeaters have
been refurbished recently and the antenna was inspected last year. Radio units, over a
period of time, wear out and require replacement. The March 1993 meeting agenda of
the Joint Boards included a discussion about a proposed replacement of some units, as
well as some new units for expanding needs, totalling 42 units at a cost of$38,383 plus
tax. One of the issues raised at that time was the advisability of continuing to invest in
this radio system in light of the movement to a county-wide 800 MHz radio system by
many public agencies in Orange County. The balance of this report will present the
status of the County's 800 MHz radio system, the reasons for this change, and the impact
such a change will have for the Districts.
2
April 21, 1993
Discussion
Following years of inquiry and discussion, on November 6, 1992 the FCC released a
Notice of Proposed Rule Making (PR Docket No. 92-235) in the matter of"Replacement
of Part 90 by Part 88 to Revise the Private Land Mobile Radio Services and Modify the
Policies Governing Them." This Rule was drafted to promote the more efficient use of
the frequency bands below 512 MHz allocated to the private land mobile radio (PLMR)
services, of which the Districts radio frequency is a part. The FCC document, over 430
pages in length, presents a large volume of technical details relating to the proposed
changes. This report will only attempt to highlight the key elements of this rule as it
relates to the County's efforts to develop an 800 MHz radio system and the impact on the
Districts.
Overview of PR Docket No. 92-235:
There are four changes proposed by the FCC in this docket for the PLMR services:
1. Implementation of spectrum efficiency standards to increase the capacity, in terms
of number of available channels, of several bands by 300 to 500 percent. These
standards would generally reduce channel spacing from the present 16 KHz to
6.25 kHz or less.
2. Channel exclusivity option in the bands above 150 MHz. This would be
accomplished using a market-based approach called "exclusive use overlay,"
which involves achieving exclusivity through concurrence of existing users.
3. Consolidation of the current 19 radio services provided by the FCC.
4. New technical and operational standards, such as:
a. Significant reduction in permissible transmitting power levels which will
permit more efficient geographic co-channel reuse.
b. Centralized trunking.
C. Set aside channels for specific operational characteristics.
d. Designate channels for new high-technology type operation.
e. Simplification of rules, in general.
Reason for the FCC or000sal:
In the past seven decades, PLMR has become the largest and most important area
regulated by the FCC. The number of available channels within the PLMR service is
rapidly dwindling and the competition for the remaining space is climbing. The FCC,
following an inquiry made in July 1991, perceived an opportunity to expand the number
�.J 3
April 21, 1993
of channels by "squeezing" more out of the existing bandwidth. All of the four previously
mentioned changes covered in the FCC proposal hinge on this single point. The method
of meeting this goal and Its Impact are the greatest source of debate within the
community of radio users. The following section will illustrate the debate over this point.
(It should be noted that this proposal is openly directed at increasing FCC revenues
through the sale of the increased channels obtained as a result of these changes. In fact,
the entire Docket No. 92-235 proposal was drafted by an economist (Dr. Doron Fertig,
Ph.D.), not a technician. This has added fuel to the fire of debate over the technical
soundness of the proposal's details.)
Channel soacino:
Present tolerances allow for a spacing of 8 kHz above and below each assigned
frequency. The resulting total width is 16 kHz. The FCC, having received an outcry over
the impact that their proposed change will make if instituted too quickly, proposes a two-
step change. The first step would shrink the overall width to 12.5 kHz. The final step
would shrink the width to 6.25 kHz. The rationale for making the change in two steps is
that the first step (proposed for 1996) should sufficiently minimize the technical changes
necessary for existing equipment to reduce obsolescence and enable users to continue
to experience close to expected depreciation on their existing inventory of radio
equipment before the final step is instituted. The final step would occur in 2004. In every
instance, however, it is acknowledged that modifications will be necessary to radio
equipment to enable it to work within this reduced bandwidth tolerance.
Public Response to Docket No. 92-235:
By the FCC's own admission, the public response to the proposed changes has been
strident. The original NPRM when it was released on November 6, 1992 had a reply
comment date of February 26, 1993. The volume of comments received has prompted
the FCC to extend this date to May 28, 1993. In a telephone conversation with Dr. Fertig
on March 30, 1993, he stated that the tenor of the comments received by the FCC is
such that it is doubtful that the proposed changes will occur in exactly the same fashion
as originally outlined and that the time frame may be altered somewhat. However, they
are still committed to the goal of obtaining more channels. He also stated that the FCC
is aware that many public agencies such as ours may be severely impacted by such a
change, especially when available funds are so scarce. He stated that it is the goal of
their proposal that changes required to existing equipment be kept in the $100 per unit
range and that an upper limit of $300 per unit will be set to limit the financial burden to
agencies. He did not have an answer to the question of whether or not a radio might be
deemed too old by the manufacturer to upgrade and yet still too new to be normally
considered fully depreciated and otherwise obsolete. Dr. Fertig concluded the interview
4
April 21, 1993
... by stating that the FCC is limiting its responsibility to limit negative fiscal impact for
changes to the PLMR service to 10 years. Based on the shrinking availability of
channels, unless these changes are implemented by the year 2004, drastic changes will
need to be imposed after that date, regardless of the costs to users.
Associated Public-Safety Communication Officers Response:
The PLMR service is composed of such a broad range of interests that special
organizations were established long ago to act as a voice In representing the user
community to the FCC. Since the Districts acquired their radio system, the staff has
worked through the County of Orange's GSA Communications Division in almost all
dealings with the FCC.
The County Communication Division is a member of CPRA (California Public-Service
Radio Association) which is the California chapter of APCO (Associated Public-Safety
Communications Officers). APCO is the FCC-designated frequency coordinator for all
police, fire and public safety agencies in the U.S. and Canada. Both APCO and CPRA
have been active since the 1930's in representing the interests of their members in all
dealings with the FCC. (As of this writing, Steve Hovey, the Districts Information Services
Manager is obtaining his own membership with APCO and CPRA to enable the Districts
to have a more direct voice in dealing with the FCC.)
./ APCO began work on its response when the FCC made its first inquiry in 1991 and
APCO saw the direction that the PLMR service was heading. The technological features
which the FCC is seeking to extend to the PLMR services already exist for the 800 MHz
band. APCO perceived the FCC's push to the PLMR service users to adapt and change
as an opportunity to recommend a better solution to its community of public safety-related
organizations. The "better" solution involved the use of"trunking" radio frequencies and
thereby enabling diverse agencies throughout a given geographic region, i.e., a county,
to have the capability, when needed, to share a common channel or channels for
coordination during emergencies. It was through the recommendation of APCO, and in
particular its California chapter, CPRA, that the entire 800 MHz proposal was drafted for
the County of Orange. In other words, the 800 MHz radio system is a local response to
the FCC's proposed changes, not a direct mandate of the FCC.
Status of the County's efforts and costs:
The County was alerted by APCO in early 1990 regarding changes the FCC was
considering but had not yet announced. Various cities and agencies in the County
(including the Districts) were contacted by the County in the spring of 1990 to assess
initial interest in the new 800 MHz band system. No firm commitment was sought at that
time due to the lack of specifics regarding costs, etc. Since that time, specifications have
5
April 21, 1993 \
been drawn up and proposals from various vendors have been solicited. At this point in
time, the negotiations have narrowed down to two vendors. Original proposals were
received February 3, 1992. Extensive analysis of the competing proposals revealed that
costs were significantly higher than projected and the technical problems more significant
than expected. In fact, the technical problems posed by each proposer were such that
neither would be able to receive a license from the FCC.
The present status of the project is that an evaluation process is underway to determine
the adherence of each proposal's technical content to the corresponding specifications
outlined in the RFP. It is anticipated that within the next two months the County Selection
Committee will be able to obtain authority to negotiate a contract with a single
recommended vendor.
There are many hurdles which this project faces that were not anticipated when originally
envisioned three to four years ago. One of the biggest problems is funding. The county
backbone system was originally projected to cost$41 million. The cost estimates are now
up to$49 million and climbing. Bond financing was originally envisioned, but that solution
now looks as if it may end up costing at least $61 million. All of the cities and agencies
originally contacted have the same question regarding the costs. Unfortunately, until the
selection process is completed and authority granted to negotiate with a single vendor,
no one is at liberty to divulge projected costs. The downside of this situation is that until
agencies can determine individual costs, no commitment of participation can be obtained
from organizations like ours. It is expected that this selection process and subsequent
granting of authorization will be completed this summer. At that time the Districts and all
other agencies and services, both city, county and otherwise, will be polled for their
interest and commitment in participating. During this survey, more detail will be available
to enable each organization to determine what their projected costs would be.
It was assumed from the start that the cost of the county's backbone system would be
shared by its participants. The impetus for those joining the new system was to obtain
more subscribers so that the overall cost to all would be minimized. However, two new
issues have entered into the picture: The first issue is a technical one — some radio
engineers are beginning to question the theoretical limits of the proposed system. The
essential question is whether this system will be "oversubscribed" and become so
crowded by traffic as to become virtually unworkable. It is generally agreed that there
may be a limit to how many users this system will bear. There is no plan as to what can
be done to overcome the practical limit when it is reached. This concern is especially felt
by the Districts' staff as the Districts' two-way radio system requires relatively high traffic
volume because of the nature of the communications needed to continuously operate our
two expansive treatment plants, when compared to other public service agencies.
The second issue which has recently been raised is the method of cost sharing. In
6
April 21, 1993
today's fiscal reality, one-time cost recovery Is being perceived as possibly not as
valuable as an on-going revenue source. The possibility has been raised that the County
may elect to absorb the entire cost of the backbone system and institute an annual "user
fee" for all participants. The answer as to how the cost will be shared is still unknown
and awaits the County's decision.
Basic features of the proposed 800 MHz radio system:
The basic concept of the new 800 MHz radio system is closely paralleled by the cellular
telephone network. No one agency or organization will lay claim to a particular radio
frequency. A range of frequencies will be "trunked" in a fashion similar to the way a
telephone PBX system works. Modern micro-electronics will enable the creation of"talk
groups" and "subgroups". This means that the Districts will use the radio system exactly
as we do now. Vector Control and Animal Control, police, fire, etc., will also use the
same radio system but will be on separate "talk groups". As a result, only Districts' staff
will hear Districts' staff and vice versa. The other agencies will only hear their own traffic,
as well. (There is no theoretical limit to the size of a talk group.) "Subgroups", if we
chose to implement, would enable us to segregate on-air traffic further to subgroups
within the Districts, such as Source Control Inspectors, vs Operations staff, etc. When
necessary, the new radios will also be able to function in "simplex" mode (direct radio-to-
radio communication), which the Districts can already do with its 453 MHz radios.
The new system would provide significant improvements in the range of coverage due
to the installation of mountain-top repeaters. This would be part of the over-all cost of the
County backbone system. Another advantage of the new system would be redundancy.
The County would be carpeted with repeater "cells" in such a way that if one went
"down", the surrounding cells would automatically take up the slack so that no
degradation of signal would occur. In an emergency, it would be less likely that there
would be a "single point of failure" as there is now with the Districts' single tower
(although there is a spare antenna, transmitter and repeater in storage). The new radio
system would also provide the Districts with a built-in mutual aid channel to enable staff
to coordinate with other services and agencies In times of emergencies such as
earthquake, toxic spills, etc.
Impact on the Districts:
There are some details concerning the impact that the new 800 MHz radio system will
have on the Districts which are known at this point in time:
1. Reouires forfeiture of existing 453 MHz System. Adoption of the new system will
require us to relinquish our present 453 MHz radio frequency license. In other
7
April 21, 1993 --
words, we would not be able to adopt the new system keep the old one as well.
(If the Districts do not adopt the new system, we will retain the 453 MHz radio
system but it may have it's own limited life span of cost effectiveness by the year
2004 due to possible expensive modifications to our system mandated by the FCC
proposed changes.)
2. Current equipment would be obsolete. All radios and pagers which the Districts
now own would be obsolete if the Districts adopt the new 800 MHz system. In
addition, it is not technically possible to modify any of our present radios to utilize
the new 800 MHz system. Therefore, all of our present radios and pagers would
become surplus.
3. Cost estimates. Projections of a "per radio" cost were $2500 for mobile radios,
$1,500 for portables, $600 for desk sets and $7000 for base stations (the true
costs may end up being much more). Our present inventory consists of 125
mobile radios, 150 portable radios, 25 desk sets and 2 base stations. The costs
would be nearly the same as if the Districts were replacing its present inventory:
$680,944 (plus pagers). This price would not include replacing our voice pagers,
as mentioned below. Other administrative equipment would also be needed but no
projection of costs is available. In addition, considerable costs would be required
for communications consulting, installation, coordination, and licensing.
4. New 800 MHz System will not accommodate voice paging. Voice paging will not
be available with the new system. The Districts' 300 voice pagers would become
surplus. Voice paging will not be possible with any of the options available.
Paging will be limited to either a beeper or an alphanumeric display pager. The
Districts' service options for paging will be limited to:
a. Contracting with the County for use of its current 900 MHz paging system.
There is a cost for this "service" and would only be slightly less than the
next choice.
b. Contract with a private paging firm for paging service.
Either solution will be less flexible than our present method of paging. Many plant
phones are currently restricted to prevent unauthorized telephone calls out of the
plant. However, the Districts' present PBX and paging system allow calls on any
phone in the plant to access the paging system. Either of the two options above
would require an "outside" call in order to page someone inside the plant. This
outside call would not be possible with our currently restricted phones. This would
also increase PBX traffic on the Districts' outbound trunks, limiting their availability.
5. 800 MHz System will not be available for two to three years. Assuming a County
contract is signed with the selected vendor by mid to late 1993, it will be at least
two more years before the County of Orange will have its backbone system
8 `a,d
1
April 21, 1993
complete. If a decision was made for the Districts to join this new system, the
Districts would not be able to begin work on our portion of the 800 MHz system
until mid to late 1995, following the completion of the County's backbone system.
Consequently, the present 453 MHz system will need to continue to be maintained
for a minimum of two to three years regardless of whether or not the Districts elect
to join the new 800 MHz system.
Conclusions
It is obvious to staff that, based on the Input received from the FCC, APCO and Orange
County Communications Division, our present 453 MHz frequency radio system will
approach the end of its effective use over the next 10 years. It is also apparent that if
the Districts continue to use the 453 MHz system, we will be required to pay for
modifications to our existing equipment at some point during the next 10 years. The
exact dates that these costs will occur and the exact amounts are still undetermined. Our
view of the County's proposed 800 MHz radio system Is as follows:
Positive: 1. New technology providing frequency trunking, greater coverage and
talk-group capabilities which are not possible now at the 453 MHz
frequency.
2. Mutual Aid channel capability for emergency use.
Negative: 1. New technology is untested and unproven. Districts' day-to-day
need for radio communication to assist in operations precludes
experimenting with new technology and risking communication
disruption.
2. Mutual Aid channel only available through use of County backbone
system. This system is not fully designed yet. A minimum of two
years will be required to build and lest the system.
3. Costs for new system backbone are completely unknown. Method
of cost recovery is undetermined. Cost of replacing existing radio
equipment will be significant.
4. The new system may be undersized and oversubscribed. The
Districts may discover (too late) that the traffic load on the system
will severely limit its usefulness.
r 9
April 21, 1993
Recommendation
Because of the many unknowns at this stage pertaining to the new County-wide system
implementation and their affect on the potentially significant impacts on the Districts two-
way radio communication needs, staff has concluded that there is insufficient information
to enable a knowledgeable determination on participation of the new 800 MHz system at
this time. Staff, therefore, recommends the following actions:
1. Continue to monitor the progress and development of the proposed new
County-wide 800 MHz Radio System, and upon receipt of additional
information, assess the advisability of the Districts participation in the
system and report back to the Boards; and, for the interim continue to
maintain the Districts' existing 453 MHz Two-Way Radio System in a state
of readiness and repair to meet the Districts day-to-day and emergency
radio communications needs.
2. Approve purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment(Specification No. E-227)
from Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc., in the amount of
$38,383.00 plus sales tax. (This is the action that was deferred by the
Boards at the regular March 10, 1993 meeting pending a report on the 800
MHz Radio System.)
10
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO, 13 AI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
108a ELLIS AVENUE
PO
BOM"'a'
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92928.8127
OIA1SE2-0Atl
April 27, 1993
REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE
MEETING DATE: APRIL 27. 1993 - 11:30 AM
COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Pr n :
John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
John J. Collins Charles Egigian Nichols, Conservation, Recycle
Burnie Dunlap and Reuse Manager
James M. Ferryman Ed Torres, Air Quality Manager
Frank Laszlo
William D. Mahoney
Maria Moreno
Henry W. Wedaa
Absent: OTHERS PRESENT:
�.Ai Victor Leipzig Betty Mrgudich, General Counsel's Office
Ted R. Moreno La Ronda Bowen, Public Advisor, SCAQMD
Carrey J. Nelson David Rutherford, Public Information Specialist,
Glenn Parker SCAQMD
Iry Pickler
Leslie A Pontious
Robert Richardson
Phil Sansone
Sal Sapien
Peer Swan
AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT ISSUES
The Committee met at the Southern California Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) headquarters in Diamond Bar. The SCAQMD staff reported on the full
range of programs and management of the district. The Committee toured the
SCAQMD facilities including the laboratory and the on-site fuel cell equipment. The
fuel cell is identical to the equipment being contemplated for installation by the
Sanitation Districts.
CEN:gc
Ref #330157.rp
✓ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
St ORANGE COUNTY, CAUEORNPA
F
1pPC ELLIBOX AVENUE2A.BOX 0127
fOUNLIN VRLIFv,GLIfOPN1182]2B91BJ
f]tn B82Y.tt
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
MAY 12, 1993 - 7:30 P.M.
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKIN6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/93 PAGE I
V
REPORT NUMBER AP 9]
C 4 SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS
D _ .. _ .. ._. ..
CLAIMS PA10 04/07/93 POSTING GATE 09/07/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMDUNT DESCRIPTION
128927 A6 TECH CUMPANV $69.328.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.O.10-9-91
12892E AGA CORPORATION $1.674.98 GAUOB
128929 AM BEST COMPANY $90.00 BOOKS
128930 A 7 a 1 f3.831.6b LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
229931 AMERICAN TELEPHONE a TELEGRAPH $1.21401 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES _-_-
228932 A T a 7 i165.77 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
228933 ACLU-LABS RESEARCH INC 450.60 1" SERVICES
y 12893E ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP }3y.188r04 ENGIN66R3NG SBEVICEE. M.O.11-18-92
m 128935 AIR ACCESSORIES CO $55.96 FILTER
Z 128936 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC SIB0.66 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS
C 120937 AIR PRODUCTS a CHEMICAL . IN $603.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLT98. .
y 12093E ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT $27.19 ASPHALT
128939 AMEN SOCIETY FOR HICRDBIOLG 1452.40 PUBLICATION
^-' 12894C AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTN _ . _. $436. 4 LAB SUPPLIES
m 128941 AMICON, INC 1929.46 LAB SUPPLIES- - - -- - _
3 128942 AMAESCO. INC 497.86 LAB BUPPLI68
128943 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION .. . %23.643.00 SEWER REPAIR -DIET SR6
-It 128944 ANDATACO $645.71 _-_ LAB SUPPLIES - -
128945 BLAME P ANDERSON 67J.85 CBLLUIJIR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT
1 120946 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL 6230.00 _ SERVICE AGREEMENT
128947 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 1972.9E
NOTICES 6 ADS _ - . .
>D 12894E APPLIED DATA ENS INC 4164.10 LAB SUPPLIES
128949 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING ;2.101.3i _
_ _ PAYROLL SERVICES ____ _ __
126950 ORFIKK PORTABLE
IL SERVICES 393.64 PORTABLE REETROOM _ -
ty 128952 BAM LANDFILL 33r793r64 RESIDUALS REMOVAL N.O.10-9-91
N 12895E BATTERY
SPECIALTIES _- . - ATRBRIE
129953 BA%TCR DIAGNOSTICS INC LAB SUPPLIES
120954 ROBERT VEIN WILLIAM FROST $2,442.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-33
128955 BELL SECURITY _ _. _ _6915.0k TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES
C7 128956 VT DILLARD INC 1616.97 — - MECHANICAL REPAIRS - - ---- '- -
N 128957 BIOMERIEU% TITER INC 140.E29.1b AB EQEIPME BMBNT
12695E 810 TECH NE7. INC . .. $27.51 -128959 BON-A-RUES f305.al TRUCE 'PARTS
12896C BOVLE ENGINEERINb CORP $49.101.18 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-7-1
128961 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC _ __1918.20.. _ ELECTRIC PARTS
-- ENGINEERING-SERVICES-PI=]T
12896E BROWN a CALDWEJANITORIAL
CONSULTING $1,650.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
128963 BUDGET JANITORIAL fir 250.00 TRAINING VIDEO
126965 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE __. . ...._ ;15r92. _ ..—_.VALVES. _.. ._ _.__.. ......_..__. ...__ -. __ ._...._.__._...
120965 GANMC ENGINEERING CO S510,904.41 03
128967 GART G STN EEO f2.904.83 PETTY UBLI CASH RBIMBVRBBMENT
128968 CRC PRESS INC "49.45 PUBLICATION
12F968 CS COMPANY $782.16
_ . ..—VALVE PARTS___._
12E970 CALIFORNIA AU IOMA TIC GATE 1181.1E SERVICE AGREEMENT
128971 CAV S CAMERAS AEU VIDEO1NEEK .237.49_ CAMERA REPAIRS
328911 JOhN CAP OLLO ENGINEERS t29r2]7r 71 � ENGIN88RING SERVICES P2-36; Pt-34
128972 CENTURY PAINT $215.32 PAINT BUPPLI68
V✓
ri
N FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YVRMIN4 CAPITAL PPUOESS ING GATE 3/71/93 YA4E <
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAN6E COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/07/93 POSTING GATE 49/47/93
WARRANT NO. VLN04R AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
128973 CtNTUAY SAFETY INST L SUIY /19.b60.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128974 SOUTHERN CAL MATLRLAL HANULINU 56.878.23 STORAGE UNIT
128975 COLICM AND SONS $1.774,936.40 CONSTRUCTION I-9
128976 COLLEGE PLACEMENT COUNCIL *237.05 SUBSCRIPTION
128977 COMPRESSOR COMFONENTS OF CA 22.605.OT FITTINGS
126978 COMPUSA. INC. 665.38 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
128979 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIV $16.37 TRUCK PARTS
n 12898C CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 46,735.27 ELECTRIC PARTS
On TOOLS 12P981 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $1.200.52 f7l 2 12896 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 91.616.25 CHLORINS M.0.10-9-91
C 128983 COSTAR INDUSTRIES
USTRIES INC i1.198.O6 INSTRUMENT PARTS
Da 128985 STATER CARP ,255.47 LAB SUPPLIES '
128985 STATE BOARD OF E0UIL12Ai10N f295.A7 UNDERGROUND NHL BTORAO6 P669
--i 128997 DAPPER TIRE - 451h.51 TIRES
GLASS
ITl 128988 DE GUE LLE f SUNS GLASS CO f167.eB LAB S
3 128989 DELTA FOAM YXUDVC7S f169.57 LAB SUPPLIES
# 126990 DELTRON INC i169.84 INLTHVMHNT PARTS _
l0 128991 DE2URIN ANDIORENVIRONMENTAL
CS CO 93,867.75 ANIONIC
128992 DIATEC EN YIASSOCIATE $1.293.60 ANIONIC POLYMBA M.O.0-12-92
128992 DIGITALPO ASSOCIATES $1.154.30 PRINTING
128997 DIGITAL ENTERPRISES
CORP $3,393.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE R
r 128995 DUNNDT WARERYR ESES INCIbC i3.393.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE i REPAIRS
r 128995 OVNN COYAROS CORP i314.L3 _ FAINT SUPPLIES
Ly NGS
121996 D�VALS SALES i1]2.96 INSFITTRUMENT
126997 EIM CO/Ntlt SUPPLY f4.,93.8A INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
�--. ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-46
N 12899E EnA SERVICES INC i2$192.11 LAD SUPPLIER " ' "
129000 E S S $715.11
� 129001 EAGLE NIS TRIBUTIxU 3715.10 SAFETY BUPPLI68
129002 ELSTMRN INC t6$915.08_ _ OFFICE BUPPLIES
RV
_. ..ELECTRICAL SERVICES
129002 ELECTRO-TEST INC .542.04
N 129004 ENCHANO DYNAMIC StRY10ES iJ.592.0U PROFESSIONAL 86RVIC68
129009 ENCHANTER ER INC i3A920.00 ... DCBAN MONITORING HDRAWA 0-92
129005 JOSEFN EVANS f2.500.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHmMWAL
129006 CHARLES EVANS 6 ASSOC. $59.201.00 CONSULTING 86RVIC68 - LAB
L29007 FALCON DISPOSAL SLRVICE f3.900.40_ RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
12900E FEDERAL ERF PE55 CORP 1368.10
. . _. AIR FREIGHT_—. .
129009 FISCHEROAS F68.10 PROPANE
129011 FISHNET L SCIENTIFIC
CO -, fy$294.81 CHLLAB SUPPLIES
PARTS
129011 FISHER SCIE Ni If IC CO 329 A.81 LAB BUPPLIBB _....-
129012 FISONS INSTRUMENTS i13.54 LAB BUPPLI68
129013 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. f29fi.O4.- CONCRETE CUTTING
_. - -
129C19 FLU-SYSTEMS f3.129.0E PUMP PARTS
1291 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $61.03
FILM
129016 THL FNRBVR0 CO . 0 .4b INSTRU
MENT SUPPL
IES
129017 GET. INC. $244.96 OFPICE eOPPLIHE
129F18 GANANL LUMBER CO $865.22 LUMBER/HARDARE
ri
t � �
W
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3131/93 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP13
CUUNTVCLAI SANITATION 04/ 7/93DISTRICTS Of ORATES COUNTY ..
CLAIMS PAID 09/0%/9! POSTING DATE 01/07/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR ANUUNT DESCRIPTION
129019 6ARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY 36.917.78 CHEMICALS
129520 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. s1.297.4k INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
129021 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $170.24 TELEPHONE SERVICES -
129022 BIENLICh-MIICHELL INC $1.567.52 PUMP PARTS
129023 N GLANTI 6 SON $565.75 BUILDING MATERIALS
129G24 DON GREEK T ASSOCIATES 41,755.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 "
129025 HB TYPE 6 GRAPHICS $1.992.79 PAINTING
a 129026 MACH COMPANY $325.22 CAN SUPPLIES
G� 129027 PL HAWN CO INC $207.03 FILTERS '
r1l 12902E HELLO 4252.10 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT
Z 129C29 HOERBIGLR CVS CALIF INC s211.31 COMPRESSOR PARTS
C7 189030 RC ROFFMAN ANU/OR 1SCO S9J9.45 LAB SUPPLIES -
n PAINT SUPPLIES
129031 PS HUGHES CO INC f76A.0G OFFICE SUPPLIES
129033 HUNTINGTON VALLEY
RSCHWI STA Sir$77•44
f l INSTRUMENTATION
PARTS -'
129077 HUNTING TON VALLEY SCHY7NN L iT 1.19
g 129031 ISC 56.214.43 IERRIC CHLORIDE SERVN.D. CES
11-
129675 IMPERIAL PEST CHEMICAL i88.321.29 _ FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O. 11-18-92
� 129636 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PpUUVtTS il•913.23
CONNECTORS
129038 ING ANFARTEET s25.00 OFFGHT
ICE
P 12903E INAR AM PAPER $7$145.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES
129040 JLA CREDIT WEST N S $434.16 HICROFJANITORIAL
SUPPLE LEASE
n 129041 GREAT CATCHING
SANITARY SUTG s931.16 DIRECTORS-
SUPPLIES
G
r DIRBCMRB' MEETING EXPENSE
r 129042 JIM-S SUSPENSION
3398.00 TRUCK REPAIRS - -- - - -
129C92 JOHNS SUSPENSION SERVICE 220.31 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
O 129644 JONESTD NE SUPPLY $228.]1
129 G91 JON ES CHEMICALS INC $A 0]113 .. CHEMICALS
129045 KCTTENBUR6 MARINE 671.08 NAQIINB SUPPLIES
129046 KING BEARING INC 1669.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES
129047 KNOK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2,773.10 - roNETRUCTION SERVICES I-9
(") 129048 MARTIN KORDICK SR $3.248.25
N 129049 THE LAST POND 3655.00 COMPUTER SERVICES
129050 LAYMANr 40NES V EYE, LAWYERS 9733.50 LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER IND.
129C51 LEGI-TECH s320.00 PUBLICATION" - -
129052 LEE E RO CONSULTING LN4R 318r687.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38-5
129053 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $6.502.71 3EIP FIELD SAMPLING PROGRAM
OCEAN MONITORING
129055 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $255.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
129056 HOT ANALYTIC COMPANY 3235.00 LAB SERVICES
129057 MEC ANALYTICAL SYSTEMS INC. it$223.62 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
129057 "PS s$46.93 INSTRUMENT PARTS
12905E NSA 11T.93
129059 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC s2.$42.87 MBCNRUICAL PARTS
129061 NARY AC ELECTRONICS 834.54 INSTRUMENT N PARTS "-
129061 MATT - CENTR INC $831.59 CHLORINATION PARTS
129063 MEKHREY CENTRAL TYFLYF1TlK I i196.71 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
129064 MEMNREK Sias.%? LAB SUFFUSE
129069 MICP046E OF CLNRIi08 SgBa.g7 OFFICE BQUIPNBNT
ri
w "
ri
3
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL - PROCESSING DATE 3/31193 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP Y3
COUNTY SANITATION LISTR ICTS OE U DATE
CLAIMS PAID L4/01/93 POSTING L4/07199/W/9]
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129065 MIDWAY MFG C MACHINING $23,229.20 MECHANICAL PARTS
129066 MINULSOTA WESTERN VISUAL TRES. 397.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES
129061 MISSION INDUSTRIES 16.222.6E UNIFORM SERVICE
129668 HEADER SUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $16.746.97 CONSTRUCTION 2-30
129069 MONTGOMERY MATSON 112.923.53 ENGINEERING SERVICES
129070 MOORE A TABER $24.750.00 BACKPILLING SERVICES
129071 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC 6166.96 HARDWARE
a 129072 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION AS 1173.26 BOOKS _
m 129073 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE A 382.00 SUBSCRIPTION
rn 129074 THE OHMAIIT CORP f934.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS
Z 129075 DR SYSTEMS CO 313.913.0E
l7 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 _
n 129076 OMEGA ENGINIERIN69 INC 91.261.7b INSTRUMENT PARTS
129077 ON-LINE ELECTRONICS S207.b4 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
129CIB ORACLE CORPORATION 61.0U.LW TRAINING REGISTRATION _
FFI 129079 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $119.24 TRUCK PARTS
3 129080 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO 11.534.83 CHEMICALS
129081 ORANGE COURIER $133.50. COURIER SERVICES _
LC) 129082 ORANGE VALVE 1 FITIINU ED. $1.875.50 FITTINGS
SECURITY SERVICES
129083 OSCAR-S LOCK A SAFE $117.62
I 129084 OXYGEN SERVICE - $2.560.12 SPECIALTY GASSES
n 129086 COUNTY OF ORANSANITATION
$8.433.69 WORKERS COMTA MSING SERVICES
P DISTRIBUTION
r 229087 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT /8 r L35.69 COMPUTER HARDWARE
r 129008 PC SYSTEMS DE S[6H _.. _ f495.65 _
12908E PSSI f2r 284.55 BH118R VIDEO INSPECTION - - -- '- '
C7 129069 PACIFIC PARTS s2068.54 INSTRUMENTATION
.. SAFETY SUPPLIES
C 129090 PACIFIC SAFETY CQUIPMENT CO S101.96 - -' - SEWER R6PAIR8
129091 PACIFIC SEWER MAINTENANCE C $2.714.00
129092 PACIFIC BELL s651.93
TELEPHONE 88RVIC68
129093 FACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS _ . 17.734.00,__- TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS _
n 129094 FAURE JANITORIAL SUPP 1235.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
N LEGAL 88RVIC68 14-1-3A
129096 PALAIENIr TV LEX. WILNlF• f$36.78 CABLE 88RVIC68
329097 PARAGON UNLIMCAOLLITED
.. . $36.7E - TRUCK PARTS
129096 PARTS UNLEMITED ,290.42
12909E ROMERT PE TEARS f29G.42 GASNIBHMENT OVERPAYMENT
129100 PIMA GBO SYSTEMS INC 31629190.51 ,. POSTAGE
MACHINE H L M.O.5-8-91
129101 PITNET ROWER CREU11 [OxY f190.51 P08TAG6 AGREEMNLBASS
129102 POLYMETpI CIN INC. 61.436.45 SERVICE AGREEMENT
129202 PRESENTS INC 515.172.49 _. CATIONIC POLYMER M;0.3-11-92 - -
129303 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS s45 6.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES
129164 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICL $96.00 ICE
1291CS PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY $564.76 PUMP PARTS
129166 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. 42,099.14 GROUNDBKEEPING-SUPPLIES
1291L7 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 64064.16 INSTRUMBNTATION INSPECTION H.O.7-17-91
12910E OUESTRON CORP S5r432.J0 LAD SUPPLIES
129109 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES INC $29,687.76 COMPUTER 88RVIC68 M.0.0-12-92- --'---
129110 A M CONTROLS $151.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS
ri
F
ri
L7I FUND NO 9199 - Jl UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCE351N6 GATE 3/33/93 PAGE 5
REPURI NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ... ..
CLAIMS PAID 44/07/93 POSTING DATE 04/07/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129111 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO 4109.91 LAB SUPPLIES
129112 RED VALVE CO INC 35b5.11 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129113 REDI EXPRESS 569.30 MESSENGER SERVICES
129114 RUSH MARINE STUDIES. INC $560.4. OCEAN MONITORING
129125 NCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY 33,423.04 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
129116 RDbINSON FERTILIZLk CU 31,331.79 CHEMICALS
129117 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL $949.4. INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
n 129118 SAFETY-KLLEN CORI $2,025.59 PARTS CLEANER
m' 129119 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 3533.tl0 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
Z 129120 SANTA BANK $2,956.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30
a 129121 DOUG SARVIS $375.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
129122 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS IHT-L $36.701.53 OCEAN MONITORING H.O.6-10-92
129223 C 0 WINANT Ph 0 31.304.60 OCEAN MONITORING
--1 229124 SLA-BIND ELECTRONICS INC Slr i13.4V LAB SUPPLIES
IT I29125 SENTEA SVSTEMS INC :25.2fit 85 INSTRUMENT
3 129126 SHASTA ELECTRIC f10.600.00 ELECTRIC SERVICES
41, 129127 SNUKELUCK SALES _. $6,066.30 _ _ HARDWARE
LID129128 SILVERS INSTRUMENTATION $102.74 LAB SUPPLIES -
129129 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO 9412.41 LAB SUPPLIES
I 129130 SILVERI 3 LE BOUEF 5733.50 CONSTRUCTION 7-30-1-1
n 129131 SKYPAPK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI $490.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EIANS'
r 129132 SLIDE MASTER 4433.12 PRESENTATION AIDS
r 129133 SMITH-EMERY CO 41,430.60 SOILS TESTING
129134 SO COAST AIR YUALITY 6610.V0 -- PERMIT FEES-- -
129135 SCAVMD UPDATE TRAINING ie91.67 TRAINING REGISTRATION
Cn 129136 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO .. f903r901.60 POWER
—{ 129137 SO CAL GAS CO S1 B.50tl.03 NATURAL GAB
129138 THL INANE COMPANY f700.60 TRAINING REGISTRATION
n 129139 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO 59.200.17. DIESEL FUEL
129140 STARLING INSTRUMENT CO INC i250.00 METER -
N 129141 STAMEN 2 SPASSOFF PE i3r220.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
129142 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO 31.380.85_ INSTRUMENT
129143 SPEC TECH INC $432.49 WELDING SUPPLIES
129144 STATEWIOE INSTALLERS $525.00 LAB EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION
129245 SUMMIT STEEL }1.700.26. METAL
129246 SUNSLT FOND 319.21 TRUCK PARTS---
129147 SUPELCO INC $477.95 LAB SUPPLIES
129148 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS '155.46 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
129149 TST NAMEPLATE 6 ENGRAVING CO $417.65 BNOINIRRING BERVICEe
129150 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMPANY $2,229.62 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
129151 THOMPSUD INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 4335.52. MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
129152 TONV•S LUCK L SAFE SCKYICE $154.79 SECURITY SERVICES - - - -- '
129153 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO $3,424.4. CONTRACT GROUNDSREEPING H.O.11-13-91
129154 TRANSERA CORE/NTb INTERNATION. $075.00 COMPUTER BOFTNARE
129155 TRANSNATION INC $77.55 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129156 TRAVEL EALCUTIVES $1.195.96 TRAVEL SERVICES
n
ri
1
FUND NO 9199 - JI DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31193 PAGE G
REPORT NUMULM AP43
CUUNIT SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CGUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 64/G7/93 POSTING DATE 09707/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR ANUUNI OLSCRIPTION
129157 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY INC 41.060.09 TRUCK PARTS
12915E JG TUCKER S SON INL 49.498.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS .. _
129159 TUSTIN DODGE s253.ra TRUCK PARTS
129160 TWINING LABORATORICS OF 53.360.G4 LAS SERVICES
129161 TYLAN GENERAL 32.592.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES .
129162 UHLER. INC s251039.22 CONSTRUCTION 5-32, 5-33
129163 THE UNISOURCE CORF $399.bO OFFICE SUPPLIES
PARCEL SERVICES
m 12916E UNITED PARCEL SLKVICL $522.63 SAFETY VIDEO RBNTAL9
129165 UNITED TAPE CORPORATION 563.9b SAF SUPPLIES
Z 129166 VWR SCIENTIFIC 51.359.29 LABl gUPP SUPPBING SUPPLIES
129167 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 3159.20
n 129168 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 9410.53 LAB SUPPLIES
PLUMBINGLIERVICBB
129169 VERVE-S PLUMBING $1.045.00 PUBLICATION
--1 129170 WATER ENVIRDNMLNT FED. .3167.61 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92
m 129171 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 523.6A2.50
3129172 ROURKE 6 WOODRUFF s OR s13.494.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92
4t 129173 XEROX CORP $2.485.80 COPIER LEADER
LO 12917E GEORGE TAROLLY CO $996.69 LAB SUPPLIES
129175 GEORGE YAROLLY CO $267.77 INSTRUMBNT SUPPLIES
119176 TANDLEY INSTRUMENTS 3259.05 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIESOFFICE SUPPLIES'"' - " - - -
129177 RICHARD YOUNG PROD 573.79 CGNPUTBR SOFTWARE
1- 129178 ZENOGRAPHICS $36.27
r ----------------9 . .
d TOTAL CLAIMS PAID E9/G7/93 $3.609.933.70 _
N xx xx axxxvnxxaxxv-
.�_ SUMMARY AMOUNT
t7 RI OPER FUND $427.97
N 62 OPEN FUND $2,900.21
62 CAP FAC FUND $23,557.11
R3 OPBR FUND $17,675.56
R3 CAP FAC FUND $796.55
F5 OPER FUND $1,194.00
K5 CAP FAC POND 6255,721.02
66 OPEN FUND $292.61
E7 OPBR FUND $31,142.06
R7 CAP FAC FUND $10 772.93' -_.... . . _... _. .__.
RI1 OPER FOND 6061.19
013 OPEN FUND $95.61
016 CAP FAC FUND $39,936.96
0566 OPEN FUND $4,149.52
6566 CAP FAC FUND $24,216.23
9667 OPEN FUND 62,285.8E - - - - -- ��-- -
87616 OPER FUND $9,650.54
,IT OPER FUND $956,523.63
CORP 62,007,962.5E - - - �- _-
n SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $8,033.69
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $13_ _1,900.79
p1 . . _ _. _._ _ ..... . ..
3,609,933.70
� FUND NO 9199 - JT 015T WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 4/15/93 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP A3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS AINS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
229197 A6 TECH COMPANY $28.961.79 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.O.10-8-91
129198 A T A T $4,913.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
129199 ADVANCE SCALE CO $138.00 SCALE REPAIRS
129200 46GREKO. INC $21.181.72 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT
129201 AIR PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL IN 352.296.00 06M AGREEMENT CRY. GEN. SYST M.O.8-9-89
129202 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 35.068.00 SEWER REPAIRS DIET 7
229203 ANIKTER - DISTRIBUTION $106.48 LAB SUPPLIES
n 129204 ANODYNE INC 93,060.04 ECSA DEPOSIT REFUND
129205 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 3753.7E NOTICE 6 BOB
m 129206 ARATEK SERVICES INC 31.589.89 UNIFORM RENTALS
0 129207 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 31.732.30 INSTRUMENT PARTS
y 12920E ARMOR - VAC 9546.00 STREET SWEEPING
129209 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP 3397.73 HLEC7RIC PARTS
129210 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC $300.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE MAULING
129211 ART WORKS 3177.60 FEARING SERVICES
m 129212 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. 1130.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
3 129213 ASSOCIATED DIESEL $696.15 FILTER
129214 BKK LANDFILL $3.977.28 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91
129215 BMF CORP. FIRE PROTECTION CO 3300.00 PIPE REPAIRS
129216 BRW SAFETY A SUPPLY $1,932.76 SAFETY SUPPLIES
129217 BAKERS SQUARE 0522 $100.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
129210 BANANA BLUEPRINT 317.992.86 PRINTING
129219 BANK OF THE WEST $2,931.49 CONSTRUCPION RETENTION J-23-2
r 129220 B BATEMAN $
551.88 BATTERIES
COMP DISTRIBUTION
p 129222 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $
$91.57 COMPRESSOR
129222 BAUER COMPRESSOR 397.57 LAB SU980R REPAIRS
129223 BAKTCR DIAGNOSTICS INC 3T.497.77 LAB SUPPLIES --
129224 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS 3098.00 SERVICE AGREEMENTS
129225 BELL SECURITY 91,814.75 _ _ _ TEMPORARY SECURITY_ SERVICES
[-� 129226 SIOSAFETY SYSTEMS. INC. $19.46 LAB'SUPPLIE9 - - - - ---
129227 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $440.20 RADIATOR REPAIRS
(n 129228 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $5,655.00
ENGINEERING SERVICES
129229 BRINDERSON CORP 316.210.05
'- CONBTRUCI'ION - PIPE SPOOLS
129230 BUDGET JANITORIAL 31.650.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
129231 GARY 6 STREED $4.173.81 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
129232 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY 3427.66 -OFFICE SUPPLIES - - " -
129233 CEPA $1.108.86 LAB SUPPLIES
129234 C.G.I. SYSTEMS 11,208.95 RELAY REPAIR
129235 C N 1 3323.61 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS
129236 INC PRESS INC 3388.27 LAB SUPPLIES
129237 CS COMPANY $51T.45 GAUGE
12923E CALTROL INC $5,723.78 INSTRUMENTS
129239 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC $677.03 TRUCK REPAIRS
129240 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC SATE 385.06 SERVICE AGREEMENT
129241 CALIF. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS $399.39 FITTINGS "
229242 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS $79.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
w
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 2
N REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE u4/21/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129243 JOMN CAROLED ENGINEERS 38.473.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38
129244 CENTURY SAFETY INST L SUPP 13.832.10 SAFETY SUPPLIES
129245 CHROME CRANKSHAFT INC 9370.90 MACHINE SUPPLIES
129246 CHURCH ENGINEERING INC $8.456.27 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-R1
129247 CITY OFFICE FURNITURE INC $412.54 OFFICE FURNITURE
129248 CLEVELAND COTTON PROD $134.16 LAB SUPPLIES
129249 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $72.57 SERVICE AGREEMENT
129250 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO 6104.B4 LAB SUPPLIES
129251 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 35.333.63 HARDWARE
EQUIPMBNT
m 229252 COMPUTER GRAPHICS GROUP s6.675.11 OFFICE
Z 129253 COMPUSA. INC. 33.B13.26 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
C 129254 COMPUSLRVE $24.20 COMPUTER SERVICES
a 129255 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIV $17.12 TRUCK PARTS
129256 CON-WAY WESTERN EXPRESS $67.47 FREIGHT
—I 12925? CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST S4.448.25 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
m 12925E CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTYAYS S1.727.70 PREIGNT
3129259 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO f2B1.46. LAB SUPPLIES
129260 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC i1.340.B4 TOOLS
l0 129261 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $6.745.00 SOILS REPORT
129262 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $422.46 TRUCK PARTS
129263 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $488.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
129264 CYSEREX $523.83 INSTRUMENT PARTS
r 129265 UNIVERSITY UNION S215.50 TRAINING REGISTRATION
T— 129266 DAILY PILOT 9515.00 NOTICES 6 ADS
IO 129267 DAMES L MOORE $3.651.27 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3
12926E J.Y. D-ANGELO CO INC $2,507.34 PIPE PARTS
N 129269 DATA V12 INC S50.00 LAB SUPPLIES
—I 129270 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
129271 BE GUELLE A SONS SLABS CO $941.53 GLASS
n 129272 DELPHIN COMPUTER SUPPLY i140.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES
129273 DENVILLE SCIENTIFIC INC S101.97 LAB SUPPLIES
Cn 129274 DEIURIK AND/OR CS CO $1.022.67 VALVE
129275 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 35.788.61 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.9-12-92
129276 DIFELIPPO ASSOCIATES $4.059.12 PRINTING
129277 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP id336T7.63 COMPUTER 90FTNAUR
12927E DISCO PRINT COMPANY $905.00 INSTRUMENT
129219 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE 1N $742.50 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
129260 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $7,645.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
129281 ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC 95,400.00 INSURANCE CONSULTANT -
129282 DUNN EDWARDS CORP S491.13 PAINT SUPPLIER
229283 D4VALS SALES S234.00 FITTINGS
129284 EIMCO PROCESS EQUIP CO 31.874.85 MRCHANICAL PARTS
129205 ESP NORTH s85.03 ELECTRIC PARTS
129206 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING $375.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES
129287 EASTMAN INC $9,106.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES --
129288 ECOANALTSIS INC $45.480.80 COMPLIANCE DATABASE SYST M.O.1-13-93
W
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15193 PAGE 3
o TY NUMBER AP 13
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/23/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129209 ELCCTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES f3.103.OG ELECTRICAL SERVICES
129290 EMERGENCY LIFELINE INC $5.326.88 EMERGENCY SUPPLIES
129291 ENCHANTER INC $4,400.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92
129292 ENGINEERED COMFORT SYSTEMS 51.061.80 ELECTRIC PART
129293 ENTECH LAB AUTOMATION $9,845.55 LAB SUPPLIES
129294 EIT $1,386.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129295 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC $502.00 LAB SAMPLES
D 129296 ERSHIGS INC $266.08 FITTINGS _
CD 129297 ESSENCE GROUP $375.27 COMPUTER PARTS
m 12929A EXCHANGER WORKS DIV. $1.617.13 MECHANICAL PARTS
Z 129299 MARSMALL FAIRRES f128.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
O 129300 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5.980.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
a
129302 CHEMFILTER
INC $1.163.47 EQUIPMFILTERS
m 129303 FILTER SUPPLY CO $3.247.21 SAFETY
m 129304 FIRE CASTER f3$256.45 SAFETY 9UPPLIP8
3 129305 FIRST COMPANY ,273.56 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
LI
129306 FISHER 6 PORTER CO i5.2T3.56 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
4L 129306 FLUID SCIENTIFIC CO 3425.62 LAM 9UPPLI89
1D 129300 CLIFF HANDLING STSTENS f1.014.21 PUMP
12930E CLEF FORD p NTAIEPT S2056.00 SURVEYING SERVICES N.0.6-30-92
129310 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 36,739.60 HATER USE
n 129311 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 1139.60 PAINT 9UPPLI89
r 129312 FREEDOM BY SUPPLY 311.90 TRUCE PARTS
r 129313 FREEDOM IMAGING 3942.00 LAB EQUIPMENT
CJ 12931J BUD FRET f42.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
129324 CITY OF FULLERTON 00 HATER USE
129315 65T. INC. .2N 1
OFFICE SUPPLIES
129316 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO f580.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
129317 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO f5.009.92 TELEPHONE SERVICES
n 129318 GLOBAL N-MITCHERI INC f29$138.02 M121 ANrCALSUPPLIES
PARTS
129320 GLOBAL ENGINEERING f129.30 LAB 9UPPLI89
12932O GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS f129.3U �Ew`
129322 DON
EEK AAN FEINTING f109520.00 PRINTING "
129323 DON GREEN f ASSOCIATES f562.00 SURVEYING SERVICE- M.0.6-10-92
129324 MSO TECHNOLOGY f114.562.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2, P2-44
129325 HARM Eft EQUIPMENT CO 3193.91 TRUCK PARTS
129326 MACH COMPANY 3206.15 TEST RIT
129326 FEED A HARPER $4,578.38 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
129328 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTI $1,620.00 CONTAINER
PARTS
12932E HAUSERpE CONTAINERS $1.620.00 CONTAINER ESNTA19
129330 HAUS HAWNENGINEERING EEIING $1,071.00 LAB SERVICES
12933O PL OCO INC 33.U96.05 - FILTERS
129331 HELLO s$80.00 TRAINING SUPPLIES
129333 J.M. HEMP L ERSOC 333.18 DEFERRED CORPGI9TAATION
Y-OFF
129334 G. PITfl ICE HER SHELM AN $33J.18 ELECTRIC C PAY-OFF
129330 HILTI INC 3495.65 LLBCTRIC PARTS
W
E� 3
I FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE A
t REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/22/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129335 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE $2.882.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES
129336 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC $129.27 COMPRESSOR PARTS
129337 HOKE CONTROLS DIV/HOME. INC. *138.23 VALVE
12933A HORIZON HIGH REACH A EQUIP 3439.58 TRUCK PARTS
129339 RS HUGHES CO INC 1207.22 HARDWARE
129340 HUNTER CORPORATION S56.070.5U CONSTRUCTION J-19-1
129341 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH SIS.33 WATER USE
129342 HUNTS FINAL PHASE $27.035.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE fi REPAIRS
m 129343 IRO MECHANALYSIS $2.146.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS
m 129349 ISC 151616.00 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES
Z 129345 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $48.499.89 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92
C7 129346 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $1.191.17 CONNECTORS
n 129347 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. 3342.43 TRUCK PARTS
129348 PACTEL TCLETRAC $4,208.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
-1 129349 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 3145.70 WATER USE
3 129350 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP $275.48 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
129351 KAMAN BEARINGS L SUPPLY 128.99 HARDWARE
129352 KEENAN SUPPLY $221.68 VALVES
LD 129353 KING BEARING INC $87.07 HARDWARE
12935E KNOS INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 12,074.69 ELECTRIC PARTS
129355 MARTIN KORDICK SR 11.333.30 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
y 129356 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO 172.30 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERV. AGREEMENT
r 129357 LA TRONICS $80.01 CAMERA
r 12935E LEE a PO CONSULTING ENGR $19,567.07 ENGINEERING SERVICES Pl-39-5
t7 129359 LEUPOLD L STEVENS 1284.24 CHARTS
129360 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS. CO. S1.007.50 DEFERRED COMP DEPOSIT
N 129361 KP LINDSTROM INC i1.625.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL
129362 LOS ANGELES TIMES $162.59 BLBSCRIPTION
129363 MACDONALD-STEPHENS LAB $3,514.00 LAB SERVICES
129364 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC $6.900.23 MECHANICAL PARTS
129365 MANHOLE ADJUSTING S2.260.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING
Cn 129366 MARINE L VALVE SUPPLY 1937.65 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
129367 WATT - CHLOR INC 31061.13 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
129368 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS $64.75 LAB SUPPLIES
129369 MCKINLEY EQUIPMENT CORP 1437.13 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
129370 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO 1267.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129371 MICRO MOTION $727.34 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129372 MIDWAY MFG L MACHINING $3,640.00 FITTINGS
129373 MILLTRONICS $3,860.20 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129374 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES 1131.82 MISCBL LAN BOOS SUPPLIES
129375 MISSION INDUSTRIES /3.038.46. UNIFORM RENTALS
129376 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO $875.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129377 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $58,662.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-30
129378 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $6.53 WATER USE
229379 NORSKOG ELECTRIC VEHICLES $67.066.34 ELECTRIC CARTS M.O.1-13-93
129380 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE A $142.00 SUBSCRIPTION
W
J=
� FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSIM6 DATE 4/IS/93 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE O4/21193
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129381 DX SYSTEMS CO $23.336.30 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91
129382 ON LINE SOLUTIONS $430.00 COMPUTER SERVICES
129383 OPAMP TECHNICAL BOOKS $82.64 LAB SUPPLIES
129383 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $241.02 TRUCK PARTS
129385 ORANGE VALVE L FITTING CO. S1.670.31 FITTINGS
129396 ORITEX CORP - S1r286.02 MACHINE PARTS
129387 OXYGEN SERVICE $2.458.45 SPECIALTY CASES
129388 COUNTY OF ORANGE S4.310.64 SERVICE AGREEMENT - RADIOS
m 129390 COUNTY SANITATION ORATION f2]$310.95 MORRBR9 COMP REIMBUR98MBNT
z 129391 PGC SCI CN TIFICS CORPORATION AT10N ,121.80 LAB SUPPLIES
VIDEO
129392 PSSI $2r$80.81 INWERSTRUMENT
VIDEO INSPHCTION
C 129392 PACIFIC PARTS f80.81 INSTRUMENT PARTS
Y 129393 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 51.069.9E SAFETY NE SERVICES
129395 PACIFIC RILL f59.66 TELEPHONE SYSTEM
m 129395 PACTEL JANITORIAL
SYSTEMS $1.A62.87 TELBPH0N8 9Y9THM MODIFICATIONS
3 129397 PADRE JANITORIAL RDPP f5.$72.50 JANITORIAL 9UPPLI¢9
129398 PAGE MWE $68.96 PAGER
CKI RENTALS
it 12939E PAk WEST S36.96 PACKING SERVICES
BOXES
VICE
129399 PARAGON CABLE 536.1E CABLE PARTS
129400 PARTS UNLIMITED S819.55 TRUCK PARTS
12940 POT PENDERGRAFT S460.00 DEFERRED COMP
DISTRIBUTION
129402 PERKCN-ELVER CORPORATION 31.241. 2 LAB SUPPLI69
129403 PERNA SEAL 6064.52HARDWARE
CHEMICAL
129405 PEROX IOAT ION SYSTEMS INC S3.641.42 RESIDUALS
O 129306 PIMA GPO SYSTEMS INC i156$275.30 POSTAGE
REMOVAL M.O.$-8-91
129A07 POLNET BRICS $193.95 POSTAGE MACNINH LEASE
N 129A06 POLY FABRICS f193.95 PITH
129809 POLTPUPE INC $13.968.22 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
129409 POWER ELECTRO INDUSTRIES
SUPPLY CO $68.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
ARTS
C-Y 129410 PRECISION IN DU9 TRIES 31.095.95 IONSTRUCTI PARTS
129412 NINE AURLICM L SONS ilA•O74.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-35-2
N 129A13 THE PROJECTS CONNECTION $T9.35 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
I
129A1} THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. S3.968.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91
12941 ODES TRON CORP f93.00 LAB SUPPLIES
12941
5 RAN COMPUTER SERVICES
ICES INC ST,187.06 COMPUTE R SERV
ICES
12941 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO $1.569.4
1 TRASH REMOVAL
129417 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO 31,lfi2.69 LAB SUPPLIES
129418 THE REGISTER $79.95 NOTICES fi ADS
129319 REISH MARINE STUDIES, INC 510160.00 OCAN MONITORING
1292O REMOTE METER RESETTING SVST .080.O POSTAGE
12942 P SUPPLY $3 . 2 PLUMBING SIPPLIHR
129422 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CORP ,929.80 LA RUPPLIB9
129423 POSEMOU INC. $2,920.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS
12942 PEGGY WILCOX $5.552. 8 DEFERRED COMP DIS
TRIB UTION
129425 RUSSELLCS CONST. CU. $300.00 CONSTRUCTION 19
129126 S.S. MECHANICAL $22.309.20 CON9TRULTION Pl-33-1 t"
lIl
C
FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP93
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/21/93 POSTING DATE 09/21/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129427 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS 5979.59 ELECTRIC PARTS
129428 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 5/.828.52 PLUMING SUPPLIES
129429 SANTA BANK 96,518.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30
129430 DOUG SARVIS 5375.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
129431 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS 1NT•L 517.676.95 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92
129432 SCIENTIFIC ELECTRONICS SEAV. $1.294.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129433 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES INC 52.097.25 SPECIALTY GASES
129434 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS INC $334.00 LAB SUPPLIES
229435 SECURITY SPECIALISTS 5160.00 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
Z 129436 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 52.039.33 TOOL PARTS
129437 SHURELLCK SALES $T.766.98 FIWINGS
12993E SLIDE MASTER 556.03 SLIDES
129439 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP $323.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129990 90 COAST AIR QUALITY $1,260.00 PERHIT FEES
129941 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY 51.690.00 PERMIT FEES
3 229492 SO CALIF ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 5120.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
129993 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $11,064.57 POWER
129999 SO CAL GAS CO 915.579.24 NATURAL GAS
129495 SOUVENIR PHOTO 4672.77 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
129996 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2,342.41 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
129947 STAMEN 2 SPASSOFF PE 56.72D.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2
a 129440 VESTALLOY INC 5735.91 ELECTRIC PARTS
129999 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC $597.97 PLUMING SUPPLIES
LAB SUPPLIES
129451 SPY% INDUSTRIES INC S326.b2
CJ 129451 SPYGLASS INC 1157.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
129453 SUMMI FLEXIBLE $1.203.36 MOSE
ETA
� 129A53 SUMMIT STEEL 31.055.fil TRUCK PARTS
A 129A55 SUN ELECTRIC CORP ,152.22 LAB SUPPLIES
129456 SUPELCE INC a1.178.86 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
129457 SYMANTEC CORP 578.86
229458 TEKTRAULICS &674.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES
129A59 THERMONI% INC SBB9.35 LAB SUPPLIES
129959 CHERLE ENVIRONMENTAL 5390.35 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129960 CH ARLES C TNOMAS f291.96 98NRITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
129461 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $360.91 OIL 6 GREASE
229462 TONY•S LOCK 3 SAFE SERVICL 5397.91 KEYS/LOCKS
129463 TRANSMATION INC 12.281.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129464 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES ♦206.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-20-92
129465 TRUCK f AUTO SUPPLY INC S192.69 TRUCK PARTS
129466 TRUESOAIL LABS 575.00 LAB SERVICES
129467 JG TUCKER 6 SON INC $314.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS
12996E TYLAN GENERAL 53.993.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES
229469 US AUTO GLASS CENTERS $164.57 TRUCK PARTS
129470 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $967.00 LAB SUPPLIES
229471 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5788.91 PARCEL SERVICES
129472 US DEPT OF COMMERCE MIT $31.50 PUBLICATION
Cd Ce/
V FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING C49174L PROCESSING DATE 4/15193 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/2l/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129473 VWR SCIENTIFIC 47.031.59 LAS SUPPLIES
129474 VALIN CORPORATION $861.66 RSOULATOR PARTS
129475 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $5.022.08 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
129476 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $252.00 MOTOR RBPAIRS
129477 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS S827.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES
129478 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 51.628.17 LAB SUPPLIES
n 129479 VERTEX SYSTEMS 51.007.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
129480 VILLAGE NURSERIES 3375.81 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
m 129481 CARL WARREN 8 CO $300.00 INSURANCE CLRINS ADMINISTRATOR
129482 WEATHER AND WIND INSTRUMENT $290.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES
n 129483 WEST COAST ENVIRONMENTAL $2.371.10 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
129484 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 520.302.97 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92
129485 WESTIN ENGINEERING $540.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
-i 129486 ROURKE 0 WOODRUFF A SPRADLIN $61,676.39 _ LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92
m 129487 XEROX CORP $1.819.29 COPIER LEASES
129488 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $445.31 VALVES
129489 RICHARD B EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
10 -----------------
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 $1,459.794.11
n ocavvev eeeav=evv
r
r
� BUMMAAY AMOUNT _.
N 41 OPER FUND 452.51
p2 OPER FUND $5,270.05
A 42 CAP PAC FUND $74,412.64
Cl 43 OPER FOND $29,699.77
-I 43 CAP PAC FUND $2,447.04 -- _
45 OPER FUND $4,125.34
45 CAP FAC FM $16,641.90
46 OPER FUND $40.49
47 OPRR POND $0,349.24
47 CAP PAC FUND $12,560.84
413 OPBR FUND $924.10 -
414 OPER FUND $54.00
414 CAP PAC FUND 4278.95
E566 OPER FUND $53.64
R7614 OPER FUND $302.61
3T OPER POND $630,705.82
CORF $529,701.49
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FY $30,169.91
0T DIST WORKING CAPITAL $123,995.89
-------------------
$1,459,794.11
b0
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS-
VI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
April 20,1993 1e uu9 Awuus
00 Wll 0127
MWAUX V, ..GLIr M 927254
MEMORANDUM n'^I �°" �/
TO: J.Wayne Sylvester
FROM: Teti Hoffman
SUB1ECf: PURCHASE OF FIVE FLAT BED TRUCKS
SPECIFICATION NO.A•108
Sealed bids were opened Tuesday,April 15,1993,for the Purchase of Five Flat Bed Trucks. Tabulation of bids Is
as follows:
DEALER UNm PRICE TOTAL PRICE
Los Angeles Freightliner/GMC S23,106.16 $115,530.80
Anaheim,CA
Inland Empire White GINC 23,269.00 116,345.00
Riverside,CA
Fuller Ford 23,789.00 118,945.00
Chula Vista,CA
Western Truck Exchange 23,909.00 119,S45.00
Los Angeles, CA
Wettruk International 24,535.63 122,678.15
La Mirada,CA
Carmenita Truck Center 24,800.00 124,000.00
Santa Fe Springs,CA
Its recommended theaward be made to Los AngelaS Freightliner/GMC,the low bidder forthelr proposed amount
of$11S,530.80,plus all applicable sales tall Sufficient funds have been budgeted for this purchase.
Respectfully}ubrinit",
I
Teti Hoffman '
Purchasing Manager
We hereby concur/with the above recommendation:
1' l
ry G.Streell1(
- Director of Mance
Edwin E.Hodges
Assistant Director of Mal nance
NCR AGENDA ITEM #10(a) - ALL DISTRICTS NCR
April 20, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
d ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
1081E Eu15 AVENUE
VQ BOX 0127
/ rOUNTMN VALLEY.C UMPNIA 927284127
V 91E19622 11
MEMORANDUM
To: J.Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
From: Katherine Yaro5h, Senior Buyer
Re: PURCHASE OF MICROCOMPUTER HARDWARE,SOFTWARE AND ASSOCIATED PERIPHERALS,
SPECIFICATION NO.E-229
Sealed bids Were Opened April 20,1993, for the Purchase of Microcomputer Hardware, Software and Associated
PenpheMIS. Tabulation Of bids IS as follows:
Vendor Price
OST,Inc., Santa Ana 5 31,557.25
MICTOAge Computer, Fountain Valley $32,388.00
COMP USA,Fountain Valley S 34,491,25
JIT, Carlsbad $35,253.00
Computer Datacom, Inc., In lne $37,274.85
The above Cost figures represent twenty-two (22) different Items of Various quantities. Bid proposals Were
received from flvevendors. Analyzing all bids,staff recominBnds award to 05T,Inc.,the lowest responsible bidder
for all Items, for a total Cost of$31,557.25,plus sales tax
Respectfully Submitted.
Submitted. 1
f5 a-L-rL41tJ yw YM OO.II
Katherine YaroSh
Senior Buyer
We hereby,PDntuf WRA the foregoing recommendations:Ted Hoffman,
Purchasing Manager
37 c6& ib*o�
Steve Hovey, ry 0.StreelF,
Information Services Managef I Director of Finance
"D" AGENDA ITEM #10(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "DR
Page 1 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Twenty-One (21 )
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: May 12, 1993
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 , JOB NO. J-19-1
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (DedLIetl $ 192,366.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - EXTENDED OVERHEAD COST
This item is for additional contractor extended supervision and engineering cost for
the period of January 19, 1993 through the currently anticipated completion date
of June 18, 1993. Contractor's daily rates shall not exceed the rates shown on
the following schedule:
Period Beginning Period Ending Rate\Calendar Day
January 19, 1993 February 18, 1993 $ 1 ,712.00
February 19, 1993 April 10, 1993 $ 1 ,190.00
April 11, 1993 June 18, 1993 $ 1 ,068.00
The delays associated with these costs have been caused by further delays in
starting up the owner supplied equipment and also revised startup procedures.
These extended overhead costs shall not apply in the event that completion of the
contract is delayed by Contractor's failure to complete work in accordance with the
contract documents or if the contract is complete prior to June 18, 1993 Final
accounting for this item will be provided in a future change order.
�..s�
"E-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1"
Page 2 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Twenty-One (211
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: May 12. 1993
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-19-1
The time extension associated with this item represents the calendar days between
February 19, 1993 and April 26, 1993. Startup testing of the facility was stopped
on February 19, 1993 due to inadequate engine lube oil filters provided by the
engine manufacturer. Startup testing is scheduled to resume April 26, 1993 with
alternate filter elements. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in
accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM NOT TO EXCEED: $ 187,454.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 67 Calendar Days
�...i ITEM 2 - FACILITY TELEPHONE LINES
This item is for providing telephone service for the elevator car, electric room and
control room. Telephone service to the elevator car is required by state codes and
must be completed prior to commissioning the elevator. Telephone service to the
control and electric rooms are required for District personnel currently occupying
the control room. The work also includes revisions to the elevator mechanical
room door hardware required by state elevator codes. This item was accomplished
by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO J191-026, RFI J191-270)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 3,221 .00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 3 - REVISE PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE SETTINGS
This item is for providing pressure relief valve settings for the starting and
instrument air receivers at pressures less than the maximum allowable pressure
stamped on the tanks. The work includes revising four relief valve settings for the
starting air receivers to 250 psig and revising two relief valve settings for the
instrument air receivers to 100 psig.
"E-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2"
Page 3 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Twenty-One (21)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: May 12, 1993
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 , JOB NO. J-19-1
Settings for the control pressure switches for the instrument and starting air
compressors are also revised to operate the compressors at pressures less than the
pressure relief valve settings. This item of work was negotiated with the
Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH J191-068)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1 ,691 .00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 192,366.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 67 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract
and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued �+.✓
Change Orders. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that 67 days extension of time is
required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date February 21, 1991
Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date October 12, 1992
Time Extension this Change Order 67 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 335 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 935 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date September 12, 1993
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 15,410,855.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1 ,255,080.00
This Change (Add) 1Dedu1 $ 192,366.00
Amended Contract Price $ 16,858,309.00
�d
"E-3" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3"
Page 4 of 4
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Twenty-One (21)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: May 12, 1993
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1
Board Authorization Date: May 12, 1993
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY: RECOMMENDED BY:
Engineering Manager I d6nstruction Manager Date
APPROVED B(Y:/�/�J� APPROVED AS TO FORM: ,L
Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date
HUNTER CORPORATION
ACCEPTED BY:
� Y-*73
Contractor Date
(J-19-1\C0.21)
"E-4" AGENDA ITEM #10(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-45 1.
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS �d
FOR JOB NOS. P1-38-2
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRIORITY -
PROJECTS ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO
FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-38-2
tttttttt:ttt:ttttttttttttttttttttt
WHEREAS, John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, have
completed preparation of the plans and specifications for
Priority .Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to
Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed project for Priority Projects
Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2, is hereby approved. Said project was
included in the Program Environmental Impact Report on the 1989
Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan
approved on July 19, 1989. A Notice of Determination was filed
by the Secretary on July 20, 1989, in accordance with the
Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
"F-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1"
Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors
by John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers' , for Priority
Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36-2, are hereby approved and adopted;
and,
Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to
advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of
the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and,
Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to
establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly
opened and read; and,
Section 5. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director
of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on
behalf of the Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12,
1993.
RCU.045
"F-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of 9 u
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX a127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ( ,
4^nce cook (714)962-2411
March 9, 1993
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Addendum No. 3 to Professional Services Agreement
with John Carollo Engineers for Additional Design Services in Connection with
Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job P1-38, and Miscellaneous
Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2.43
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional services, the Selection
Committee has negotiated the following fee with John Carollo Engineers for Addendum No. 3 to the
Professional Services Agreement for additional design services, on an hourly-rate basis, including
labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, in an amount not to 1 /
exceed $527,600.00.
Existing Change per Amended
Agreement Addn. No. 3 Aareement
Engineering Services, direct
labor at hourly rates plus
overhead at 156%,
not to exceed $1,420,359.20 $439,800.00 $1,860,159.20
Construction Support Services
and 0&M Manual Preparation,
direct labor at hourly rates
plus overhead at 160%, not
to exceed 223,425.80 0.00 223,425.80
Direct Expenses, at cost,
not to exceed 76,690.00 35,000.00 111,690.00
Subconsultants, not to exceed 34,200.00 0.00 34,200.00
Fixed Profit 236,890.00 52,800.00 289,690.00
Total Contract, not to exceed 41.991.565.00 5527.600.00 42.519.165.00
"G-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(f) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
el ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
11094G ELLIS AVENUE
Boards of Directors ao Sox 9127
March 9, 1993 FOUNIAIN VALLEY,CAUFO NIA 92)2e.8I2)
Page Two nIAI 952-2a1 1
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the
services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant.
Is/William Mahoney /s/Evel" Hart
William Mahoney Evelyn Hart
Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
/s/Thomas M. Dawes
Thomas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
Selection Committee
V�
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(f) ( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-46
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO
ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN. CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
SERVICES AND PREPARATION OF OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE MANUALS FOR JOB NO. P1-38 AND
JOB NO. P2-43
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2 , 3 , 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN,
CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES AND PREPARATION OF
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS
IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB
NO. P1-38, AND MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO
FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-43, PROVIDING
FOR ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES IN THE SCOPE OF
WORK FOR SEISMIC WORK AS PROVIDED IN THE AGREEMENT
AND TO INCORPORATE ADDITIONAL CHANGES
xx++xx++xx++x++++x+++xx+++xx++x+++
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an
agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design and construction
support services and preparation of operation and maintenance
manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to
Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43 ; and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for
revisions to the errors and omissions insurance requirements;
and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for
changes in the scope of work and additional design services to
include safety items, landscaping design and odor control
enhancements; and,
"H-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(f) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1"
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said
\� agreement to provide for additional engineering services in the
scope of work for seismic work as provided in the agreement and
to incorporate additional changes; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of
Directors on January 13, 1993, the Selection Committee has
negotiated and certified a fee for said additional services, in
accordance with established procedures for the selection of
professional services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 3 dated May 12, 1993, to that
certain Professional Services Agreement dated June 12, 1991, by
and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself
and on behalf of Districts 'Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and
John Carollo Engineers for design and construction support
services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for
Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional engineering
services in the scope of work for seismic work as provided in the
agreement and to incorporate additional changes, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
"H-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(f) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2"
Section 2. That the contract provision for fees be
increased by an amount not to exceed $527,600.00, as follows,
which increases the total authorized compensation from
$1,991,565.00 to an amount not to exceed $2,519, 165.00:
Existina
Aareement Addendum Amended
As Amended No. 3 Agreement
Professional Services,
at hourly rates for
labor plus overhead at
156%, not to exceed $1,420,359.20 $439,800.00 $1,860,159.20
Construction Support
Services and
Preparation of 0&M
Manuals, at hourly
rates for labor plus
overhead at 160%,
not to exceed 223,425.80 0.00 223,425.80
Direct Expenses, not
to exceed 76,690.00 35,000.00 111,690.00
Subconsultant Fees,
not to exceed 34,200.00 0.00 34,200.00
Fixed Profit 236,890.00 52,800.00 289,690.00
TOTAL, not to exceed 31.991.565.00 5527.600.00 32.519.165.00
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District
No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to
execute said Addendum No. 3 in form approved by the General
Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993.
xnou.ors
"H-3" AGENDA ITEM #10(f) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-47
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH DAMES & MOORE. INC.
TO CONDUCT SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT OF JOB
NOS. Pl-38-3 AND P2-43-2
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH DAMES & MOORE, INC. TO CONDUCT
SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS
TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-38-3, AND
SEISMIC STUDY ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS
TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-43-2,
PROVIDING FOR REALLOCATION OF COSTS AMONG CATEGORIES
WITHIN SAID AGREEMENT
x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
WHEREAS, the Districts have heretofore entered into an
agreement with Dames & Moore, Inc. to conduct Seismic Study
Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of
Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2 , Job
No. P2-43-2 ; and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to said agreement provided for
expanding the scope of work to include preparation of plans and
specifications for Seismic Retrofitting of Headworks B and C at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2-1; and,
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to said agreement provided for
reallocation of costs among categories within said agreement,
with no change in the total maximum authorized compensation, and
provided for a name change to Dames & Moore, Inc. , a Delaware
Corporation; and,
"]-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(9) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1"
WHEREAS, it is now deemed appropriate to further amend said
agreement to provide for a reallocation of costs among Categories
within said agreement, with no change in the maximum authorized
compensation; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Addendum No. 3 dated May 12, 1993, to that
certain Professional Services Agreement dated October 10, 1996,
by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and
14, and Dames & Moore, Inc. to conduct Seismic Study Element of
Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. 1 ,
P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements `,•s'
to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, providing for
reallocation of costs among categories within said agreement,
with no change in the total maximum authorized compensation, is
hereby approved and accepted; and,
"I-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2"
Section 2. That said reallocation of costs shall be as
follows and shall not change the maximum authorized compensation
of $840,620.00:
Existina
Agreement Addendum Amended
As Amended No. 3 Agreement
Professional Services,
at hourly rates for
labor plus overhead at
180%, not to exceed $627,540.00 $17,000.00 $644,540.00
Direct expenses, not
to exceed 22,800.00 10,000.00 32,800.00
Subconsultant Fees,not to exceed 120,000.00 (27,000.00) 93,000.D0
Fixed Profit 70,280.00 0.00 70,280.00
TOTAL, not to exceed 3840.820.00 S .00 3640.620.00
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District
No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to
execute said Addendum No. 3 in form approved by the General
Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993.
aeD21.017
"I-3" AGENDA ITEM #10(g) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
s /1\ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O.BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 -
10814 ELLIS.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 9 2 70 0-7018
(714)962-2411
March 9, 1993
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with Lee & Ro
Consulting Engineers in Connection with Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the
Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for the
preparation of a project report, design, construction plans and specifications and construction
support services in connection with Jobs Nos. P1d0-2 and P247-2, on an hourly-rate basis
including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants, and fixed profit, in an amount
not to exceed $549,000.00.
Engineering Services,
direct labor at hourly rates
plus overhead at 155%1,
not to exceed $487,178.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 3,500.00
Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 12,ODO.00
Fixed Profit 46,322.00
TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed s549.000.00
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the
services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant.
s/William Mahoney Is/Evelyn Hart
William Mahoney Evelyn Hart
Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
/s/rhomas M. Dawes
Thomas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
Selection Committee
"in AGENDA ITEM #10( h) ( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS Bill
RESOLUTION NO. 93-48
APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH LEE & RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR
JOB NOS. P1-40-2 AND P2-47-2
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
LEE & RO CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR FACILITY
MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 1,
JOB NO. P1-40-2, AND FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND
SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-47-2
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County
have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the
selection of professional services; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been
`..J negotiated with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for Facility
Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of
Directors on February 10, 1993, the Selection Committee,
established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and
certified the final negotiated fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
"K-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-1"
Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement
dated May 12, 1993, by and between County Sanitation District
No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for
Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and Lee & Ro
Consulting Engineers for Facility Modifications and Safety
Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-2, and Facility
Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-47-2, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby
authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said
agreement, as follows:
Professional Services at hourly
rates for labor, plus overhead
at 155%, not to exceed $487,178.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 3,500.00
Subconsultant Fees, not to exceed 12,000.00
Fixed Profit 46,322.00
TOTAL, not to exceed 5549.000.00
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District
No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for Districts
Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and
directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993.
ruciel.wa
"K-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "K-2"
Page 1 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. One (1 )
DATE: May 12, 1993
CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
JOB: MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-30
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Dedast) $ 78,273.22
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES
The Contractor encountered various underground utilities not shown on the
contract drawings while excavating and placing the new 30-inch sewer line. On
�-� Memory Lane, the Contractor encountered an undisclosed 6-inch water line, a
10-inch corrugated line with a 2-inch gas line inside and an 8-inch sewer line, all
between Stations 13+50 and 23+79. On Parker Street, the Contractor
encountered an undisclosed 6-inch water line and two 2-inch gas lines, all between
Stations 99+51 and 102+ 18. These undisclosed lines caused delay to the
Contractor. The costs for this extra work includes labor and equipment. This work
was performed on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions
Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO No. 1-6)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 12,939.06
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2 - DUCTILE IRON PIPE IN LIEU OF VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE
The contract documents specified the use of 30-inch diameter vitrified clay pipe in
a type 4 bedding (reinforced concrete) for a gravity sewer. The Contractor
requested that in lieu of vitrified clay he be allowed to use 30-inch diameter Class
52 ductile iron polyethylene lined and polyvinyl wrapped pipe with a type 2 bedding
(crushed rock). This substitution has been approved by the Ductile Iron Pipe
Research Association and is considered equal to or better than the Vitrified Clay
under the conditions being placed. Also, the use of the Ductile Iron
"L-1" AGENDA ITEM #10( k) - DI'STRICTS 1 8 2 "L-1"
Page 2 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 108" ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. One (1)
DATE: May 12, 1993
CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
JOB: MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 2-30
pipe speeds up the Contractor's operations and consequently causes less time to
move through the residential and commercial areas. These areas were along Parker
Street and under the Santa Ana River. The work was performed on a negotiated
basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)21a) and results in a
deduction to the contract price.
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 125,000.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 3 - UNDISCLOSED ROCK CONDITIONS
The Contractor encountered rock and large cobbles on Parker Street, north of Town
and Country Road. Boring No. 9, taken at Station 106+00, did not indicate either
rock or cobbles in this area. These nesting cobbles were found from 20 to 40 feet
below the surface. The Contractor's beam drilling operations and excavation
operations were delayed along with extra hauling to remove rock from site. The
costs are on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section
10-602(b)(2) and (3)•
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 32,905.16
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"L-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(k) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "L-2"
Page 3 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 - 108" ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. One (1)
DATE: May 12. 1993
CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
JOB: MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT NO, 2-30
ITEM 4 - BROKEN WATERMAIN
A 6-inch watermain, crossing the sewer line excavation at Station 12+30 on
Memory Lane, broke during the excavating process. The water line was found to
be an old, fragile transite pipe which could not be anticipated. The broken water
line flooded the excavation. The contractor pumped out the trench and repaired
the water line, all of which delayed the contract work. The total costs amounted
to $15,445.00. The contractor was deemed partially responsible for the damage.
Therefore, the cost pro-ration was negotiated with the contractor to provide that
District would pay for two-thirds of the cost of the damage. Thus, the contractor
is to receive a credit of $10,302.00. This item was accomplished by the
Contractor's Force Account pursuant to General Provisions Section 10-6(B)2(b)(2)
and (3).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 10,302.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 5 - EXTENDED JACKED CASING
The rebuilding of the 1-5 Freeway at the intersection of Memory Lane Alley required
that the sewer line under the freeway be encased in a 36-inch steel pipe and
concrete grout. As part of interim freeway phasing, CalTrans ordered an additional
81 linear feet of encasement on the east side of the crossing. This encasement
was a CalTrans requirement. Also, an unknown concrete thrust block on a 16-inch
water line required moving the bore pit 12 feet to the east, for a total casing
extension of 93 feet. The Contractor accomplished the work on a contract unit
price basis pursuant to General Provisions Section 1 0-6(B)2(a), as follows:
"L-3" AGENDA ITEM #10( k) - DISTRICTS 1 8 2 "L-3"
Page 4 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. One(l)
DATE: May 12, 1993
CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO INC
JOB: MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR SEWER CONTRACT NO 2-30
Bid Item 13; 60-inch steel casing with 30-inch VCP pipe
additional pipe 93 feet x $670.00/LF: = $62,310.00
Partial credit for Bid Item 6; 30-inch VCP pipe with Type II
bedding. Subtract 93 feet x $131.00/LF: $(12,183.00)
Credit from elimination of jacking ph component: $(3,000.00)
Total, Item No. 5 = $47,127.00
TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 78,273.22
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
This change order includes all extra work and delays encountered by the Contractor
from the beginning of the project, Station 1 +68.03 Santa Ana River through Town
and Country Road on Parker Street, City of Orange, Station 106+00.
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract
and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued
Change Orders. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this
Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs,
expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except
as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
"L-4" AGENDA ITEM #10(k) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "L-4"
Page 5 of 6
\✓ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. One (1 )
DATE: May 12. 1993
CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
JOB: MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 2-30
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date June 30, 1992
Original Contract Time 300 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date April 25, 1993
Time Extension this Change Order 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 0 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time Not Applicable
Revised Final Completion Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 3,471,857.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00
This Change (Add) Qedaet) $ 78,273.22
Amended Contract Price $ 3,550,130.22
"L-5" AGENDA ITEM #10( k) - DISTRICTS 1 8 2 "L-5"
Page 6 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 108" ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. One (1)
DATE: May 12, 1993
CONTRACTOR: MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
JOB: MEMORY LANE INTERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT NO, 2-30
Board Authorization Date: May 12, 1993
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY: RECOMMENDED BY:
/9 93
An ineering Manager Date onstruction Manager Date
APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Director of Engineering Date ' General Counsel Date
MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY, INC.
ACCEPTED BY: /q
ontractor at
ENG\2•30\w.1
"L-6" AGENDA ITEM #10( k) - DISTRICTS 1 & 2 "L-6"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-51-2
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF PLACENTIA
FOR EXCHANGE OF OWNERSHIP RE PALM AVENUE
PURCHASE, CONTRACT NO. 2-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING EXCHANGE OF
OWNERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF PLACENTIA
RE PALM AVENUE PURCHASE, CONTRACT NO. 2-33
++tr+t#t#iwwiktifft++iiiiii#t#wt##
WHEREAS, District is the owner of the Palm Avenue Purchase
Sewer in the City of Placentia, as shown in Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and,
WHEREAS, said sewer can now be best utilized and maintained
as a local collector sewer by the City; and,
WHEREAS, District and City have agreed to exchange ownership
of said Palm Avenue Purchase, Contract No. 2-33, as it appears to
be in the best interests of both the District and the City of
Placentia.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 2 of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Agreement dated May 12, 1993,
by and between County Sanitation District No. 2 and the City of
Placentia, exchanging ownership of the Palm Avenue Purchase,
Contract No. 2-33, from the District to the City, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the transfer of ownership of said Palm
Avenue Purchase shall be at no cost to the City; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in
form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993. _
\�
RAem osi
"M" AGENDA ITEM #10( 1 ) - DISTRICT 2 "M"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-53-5
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-34-3 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING IMPROVEMENTS
TO BAYSIDE DRIVE TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 3 , CONTRACT
NO. 5-34-3, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
t ttttt+tt++t++t+++++tttt++t++++t+t
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Silveri & LeBouef, has
completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the
contract for Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3 ,
Contract No. 5-34-3 , on October 15 , 1992 ; and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of
Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having
been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract,
which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed;
and,
Section 3 . That Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer,
Phase 3 , Contract No. 5-34-3 , is hereby accepted as completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated
September 10, 1991; and,
Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is
hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion
therefor; and,
Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Silveri &
LeBouef, setting forth the terms and conditions for acceptance of
"N-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(m) - DISTRICT 5 "N-1"
Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No.
5-34-3, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the
General Counsel; and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District
No. 5, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993.
RC54D.D53
"N-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(m) - DISTRICT 5 "N-2"
Page 1 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. No. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: SILVERI & LEBOUEF JV DATE: May 12. 1993
JOB: ABANDONMENT OF RED HILL PUMP STATION. PHASE 1. CONTRACT
NO. 7-14-1-1
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) S 0.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - TIME EXTENSION
Due to the record rainfall in December 1992 and January 1993, which either
prevented the contractor to work during the rainfall or the resultant flooding of lv/
undeveloped job site, the contractor is granted thirty-three (33) calendar days of
time extension. Granting of the time extension is in accordance with the General
Provisions Section 6-4.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 0.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 33 Calendar Days
TOTAL COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 0.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 33 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract
and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued
Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 33 days extension of time to
perform the work Is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect,
incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be
incurred by Contractor.
"0-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(n) (1) - DISTRICT 7 "0-1"
Page 2 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. No. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: SILVERI & LEBOUEF JV DATE: May 12, 1993
JOB: ABANDONMENT OF RED HILL PUMP STATION, PHASE 1. CONTRACT
NO, 7-14-1-1
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date November 14, 1992
Original Contract Time 60 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date January 2, 1993
Time Extension this C.O. 33 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 33 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 93 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date February 4, 1993
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date February 4, 1993
Original Contract Price $ 90,732.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0
This Change (Add) (Dedwet) $ 0
Amended Contract Price $ 90,732.00
"0-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(n) (1 ) - DISTRICT 7 "0-2"
Page 3 of 3
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. No. One (1)
CONTRACTOR: SILVER] & LEBOUEF JV DATE: May 12, 1993
JOB: ABANDONMENT OF RED HILL PUMP STATION. PHASE 1. CONTRACT
NO. 7-14-1-1
Board Authorization Date: May 12, 1993
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY:
ngineering Manager Date Xonstruction Manager Date
APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Director of Engineering Date Gener9l Counsel Date
SILVERI & LEBOUEF
ACCEPTED BY: l/
C ,tractor
(7-14-1-1\C0.1)
"0-3" AGENDA ITEM #10(n) (1 ) - DISTRICT 7 "0-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-55-7
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-14-1-1 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING ABANDONMENT
OF RED HILL PUMP STATION, PHASE 1, CONTRACT
NO. 7-14-1-1, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
x txxxxtxtttttttttttttttxxttxxxtttx
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Silveri & LeBouef, JV, has
completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the
contract for Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1,
Contract No. 7-14-1-1, on February 4, 1993; and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of
..i
Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having
been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract,
which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed;
and,
Section 3. That Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station,
Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1, is hereby accepted as completed
in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated
November 4, 1992; and,
Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is
hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion
therefor; and,
Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Silveri &
LeBouef, JV, setting forth the terms and conditions for
"P-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(n) (2) - DISTRICT 7 "P-1"
acceptance of Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1,
Contract No. 7-14-1-1, is hereby approved and accepted in form
approved by the General Counsel; and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District
No. 7, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993.
RC5A0.055
"P-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(n) (2) - DISTRICT 7 "P-2"
�i RESOLUTION NO. 93-56-7
AUTHORIZING GRANT OF EASEMENT TO
CROW WINTHROP DEVELOPMENT RE
CONTRACT NO. 7-11-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A GRANT OF
EASEMENT TO CROW WINTHROP DEVELOPMENT
RE MICHELSON PUMP STATION, CONTRACT
NO. 7-11-2
WHEREAS, Crow Winthrop Development has heretofore dedicated
a site to the Districts for the Michelson Pump Station, and by
separate action has quitclaimed a ten-foot wide sewer easement
through said site to the District; and,
WHEREAS, Crow Winthrop Development has requested a new
ten-foot wide sewer easement through said site for construction
of a sewer to serve the adjacent Park Place development.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7 of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated
March 24, 1993, wherein a ten foot right-of-way required to
install a new sewer line over the northeasterly corner of
District's Michelson Pump Station Site, Contract No. 7-11-2, is
granted to Crow Winthrop Development, is hereby approved; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement
is granted is more particularly described and shown on
Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of this
"0-1" AGENDA ITEM #10(o) - DISTRICT 7 "0-1"
resolution; and,
Section 3 . That said easement is hereby granted for no fee;
and,
Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized and
directed to execute said easement on behalf of County Sanitation
District No. 7.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993.
WD.056
"0-2" AGENDA ITEM #10(o) - DISTRICT 7 "0-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-57-21
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LEASE
AGREEMENT WITH GTE RE SLATER AVENUE
PUMP STATION
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT
FOR LEASE OF REAL PROPERTY WITH GENERAL TELEPHONE
COMPANY FOR PLACEMENT OF EMERGENCY GENERATOR ON
PROPERTY ADJACENT TO THE SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION
r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr*rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11
of Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That an Agreement for Lease of Real Property by
and between General Telephone Company, dba GTE California
Incorporated (Lessor) , and County Sanitation District No. 11
(Lessee) , wherein Lessor agreed to lease approximately 1,206
square feet of property adjacent to the District's Slater Avenue
Pump Station, in the vicinity of Slater Avenue and Gothard Street
in the City of Huntington Beach, to Lessee for the purpose of
placing an on-site generator to serve said pump station in an
emergency, was approved on February 10, 1988; and,
Section 2. That the term of said lease shall be extended
for three (3) years commencing February 1, 1993; and,
Section 3. That payment to General Telephone Company in the
amount of $1,900.00 per year for said lease is hereby authorized,
in accordance with the provisions of said agreement; and,
Section a. That the Chairman and Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Amendment
No. 1 to said lease agreement in form approved by the General
Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993.
RMO.057
"R" AGENDA ITEM #10(q) - DISTRICT 11 "R"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-49
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79-20 (CLASSIFICATION
AND COMPENSATION RESOLUTION) RE 1993 SUMMER
WORK PROGRAM
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION
RESOLUTION NO. 79-20, AS AMENDED, RE 1993 SUMMER
WORK PROGRAM FOR PAINTING AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: -
Section 1. That a 1993 Summer Work Program for painting,
groundskeeping and general cleanup work around the treatment -
plant facilities is hereby authorized and established; and,
Section 2. That Exhibit "Be of Resolution No. 79-20, as
amended, is hereby further amended to add temporary, part-time
classifications thereto, as set forth below:
EXHIBIT "B<"
OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE CLASSIFICATIONS
Aooroximate
Monthly
Position Authorized Ranae Hourly Eauivalent
Classification Classification Personnel No. Rate Salary
30645 Part-time 38 — 58.00/hr. —
Assistant max
and that the General Manager is authorized to employ temporary,
part-time personnel in said classification; ' and,
"S-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (6) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-1"
Section 3. - That the General Manager is hereby authorized to
temporarily upgrade up to eight, full-time, permanent,
Maintenance Department employees to Temporary Crew Leader status
and to increase their compensation one salary range (5.5%) during
the period set forth below in Section 7; and,
Section 4. That the authorized annual expenditure for said
Summer Work Program should not exceed $225,000.00; and,
Section 5. That Resolution No. 92-46 is hereby rescinded;
and,
Section 6. That any other resolution or motion that
conflicts herewith is hereby repealed and made of no further
effect; and,
Section 7. That the authorizations contained herein shall
become effective May 24, 1993, and terminate September 24, 1993.
v�
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993.
RPERM.051
"S-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (6) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-50
URGING EQUITABLE ALLOCATION OF PROPERTY TAXES AND
STATE SUPPORT OF SCHOOL FUNDING IN ALL CALIFORNIA
COUNTIES BEFORE CONSIDERATION OF FURTHER PROPERTY
TAX SHIFTS
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
URGING EQUITABLE ALLOCATION OF PROPERTY TAXES AND
STATE SUPPORT OF SCHOOL FUNDING IN ALL CALIFORNIA
COUNTIES BEFORE CONSIDERATION OF FURTHER PROPERTY
TAX SHIFTS
tttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
WHEREAS, pursuant to Proposition 13, the state-wide average
allocation of the 1% ad valorem property tax is 35% to schools
and 65% to fund all other levels of local government; but in
Orange County 45% is allocated to schools leaving only 55% to
fund all other levels of local government; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Serrano Priest decision, the
Average Daily Attendance (ADA) amount per student allocated by
the state to Orange County schools is approximately $50 million
per year less than the state-wide average allocation; and,
WHEREAS, these actions create an unfair and inequitable
situation that has resulted in orange County paying
disproportionately more for schools resulting in $268 million
less being available for funding other local government services;
while at the same time also receiving disproportionately less in
state financial support for schools amounting to $50 million less
annually; and,
WHEREAS, the Governor and Legislature of the State of
California shifted $1.3 billion from Counties, Cities and Special
"T-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (7) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-1"
Districts property taxes and other revenues in Fiscal Year
1992-93 to help meet the state's obligation to fund schools and
`.../ balance the state's budget; and,
WHEREAS, the Governor and Legislature of the State of
California are proposing to shift an additional $2.6 billion from
Counties, Cities and Special Districts property taxes and other
revenues in 1993-94 to help balance the state's budget; and,
WHEREAS, these property tax shifts are placing an undue
financial strain on local governments requiring them to take a
combination of drastic measures that include cuts or elimination
of vital municipal services and programs, laying off public
employees, and passing through the property tax shift to citizens
in the form of higher taxes and fees; and further property tax
shifts will only exacerbate this situation.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Directors hereby urge that no further
shift of property taxes from Counties, Cities and Special
Districts to fund schools be considered until the following goals
have been met:
A. That no county in California be asked to contribute any
additional amount of its 1% ad valorem property tax to fund K-14
education until all counties in the state match that county's
level of contribution of the 1% ad valorem property tax; and,
B. That all publicly-funded school systems in each county
V�
"T-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (7) 7 ALL DISTRICTS "T-2"
contributing at least 40% of its property tax for education will,
at a minimum, receive the state Average Daily Attendance funding
per student.
Section 2. That the Secretary of the Boards of Directors be
directed to provide copies of this resolution to the Governor and
the Members of the Legislature of the State of California, and to
public agencies and other interested parties in Orange County as
deemed appropriate.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993.
RAU63.06O
"T-3" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (7) - ALL DISTRICTS "T-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-52
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR CONTRACT NO. 5-37-4
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 5 AND 6 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC
COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, BETWEEN THE
ARCHES (NEWPORT BOULEVARD) AND DOVER DRIVE,
CONTRACT NO. 5-37-4
WHEREAS, Boyle Engineering Corporation, Districts'
engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and
specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity
Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive,
Contract No. 5-37-4.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 5 and 6 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed project for Replacement of
Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, between The Arches (Newport
Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4, is hereby
approved. Said project was included in the Program Environmental
Impact Report on the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal
Facilities Master Plan approved on July 19, 1989. A Notice of
Determination was filed by the Secretary on July 20, 1989, in
accordance with the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
"U-1" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICTS 5 & 6 11U-1"
Section 2. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors
by Boyle Engineering Corporation, Districts' engineers' , for
Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity Sewer, between The
Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract No. 5-37-4,
are hereby approved and adopted; and, -
Section 3. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to
advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of
the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and,
Section 4. That the General Manager be authorized to
establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly
opened and read; and,
Section 5. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director
of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on
behalf of the Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12,
1993.
xcao.orz
"U-2" AGENDA ITEM #28(b) - DISTRICTS 5 8 6 "U-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-54-5
`✓ AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 5-36
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CRYSTAL COVE
PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-36
*rrrr*rrr+rr+**rr*rrarrrrrrrrrrrrr
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a
project which is a portion of the previously-approved
1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines,
the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this
project was approved by the District's Board of Directors on
July 19, 1989; and,
Section 2. That the written recommendation this day
submitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts' Director of
Engineering that award of contract be made to Schuler Engineering
Corporation for Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, and
the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are
hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That the contract for Crystal Cove Pump Station,
Contract No. 5-36, be awarded to Schuler Engineering Corporation,
in the total amount of $993,442.00 in accordance with the terms
"V-1" AGENDA ITEM #31 (d) - DISTRICT 5 "V-1"
of their bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 4. That the chairman and Secretary of District
No. 5 are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a
contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the
specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved
by the General Counsel; and,
Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby
rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held May 12, 1993.
RCW.054
"V-2" AGENDA ITEM #31(d) - DISTRICT 5 "V-2"
ORDINANCE NO. 320
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 317 PROVIDING FOR A SEPARATE CLASS
OF CONNECTION CHARGES FOR CERTAIN MINIMUM SIZE DWELLING
UNITS
WHEREAS, the District has established a requirement that all residential structures
seeking to connect to the District's sewer facilities apply for and receive a connection permit and
to pay a connection charge, all as prescribed in Ordinance No. 317, as amended; and,
WHEREAS, connection charges are assessed to provide for the cost of construction of
wastewater collection, treatment and disposal facilities necessary to serve new development or
new connection of existing structures; and,
WHEREAS, the connection charges presently in effect provide for a uniform rate of
$2,350.00 for each residential dwelling unit without regard for size, use or number of plumbing
fixtures; and,
WHEREAS, the existing connection charges were adopted after the completion of the
master plans of capital facilities for both the joint treatment works and the District's sewer
system, together with related financial and engineering reports; and,
WHEREAS, the District has recently evaluated and considered the financial and
engineering impacts of development of extremely small individual dwelling units within multi-
residential projects to accommodate independent retired or senior citizen dwelling needs.
1
"W_1" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) (2) - DISTRICT 3 11W-111
1
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of
Orange County, California, does hereby FIND as follows:
Section 1: That there is a considerable increase in the retired and elderly or
"senior" citizen population within the District, many of which are in need of lower cost housing
accommodations.
Section 2: That there are residential housing projects being developed within
the District containing small individual living accommodations with minimum plumbing fixtures
and typically limited to single person occupancy.
Section 3: That as a class, the development and occupancy of the small
dwelling units places a proportionately smaller burden on the District and joint works sewerage
facilities.
Section 4: That the present schedule of residential dwelling unit connection
charges may be inequitable when applied to certain low cost, minimum size dwelling units as
a class.
Section 5: That the District will be impacted financially by the adoption of a
separate class of reduced-connection charges for low cost, minimum size dwelling units that
qualify and meet the criteria for such reduced charges, as provided herein, which impacts will
be reviewed and evaluated periodically by the District.
2
"W-2" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "W-2"
NOW, TBERE 'ORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of
Orange County California, does hereby ORDAIN:
Section 1: That Section 702 of Ordinance No. 315 is hereby amended, by
adding Subsection B(6) to read as follows:
"702. DISTRICT NO, 2 CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION
CHARGES.
A. . . .
B. District Connection Charge Amounts.
(6) Capital facilities connection charges for new construction
residential dwelling units of less than 600 square feet that
satisfy all of the following criteria shall be $_ per
dwelling unit:
(a) The unit is designed to accommodate not more than
2 persons.
(b) The unit contains only one toilet fixture and one
bath/shower fixture.
(c) The unit is a component of a multi-unit residential
project designed to accommodate retired or "senior"
citizen residents only.
''. 3
"W-3" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "W-3"
(d) The project has been approved for development by
the city or county as a special housing project to
accommodate retired or senior citizens with a low
cost housing facility.
(e) That all other permitting authorities for the project
provide a reduction in their fees to be assessed on
the project.
(t) The local sewering agency concurs in the request
for approval of these reduced fees.
(g) The city, or county, responsible for issuing the building
permit for the project concurs with the request for approval
of these reduced fees and agrees to waive its 5%
administrative fee for collecting District sewer connection
charges for the project.
(h) The developer must submit an application and
receive approval of the Board of Directors of
District for the charge established by this
Subsection in accordance with Subsection()below.
4
"W- AG=NDA IT_M #34(b) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "W-4"
(7) The developer of a multi-dwelling unit project designed to
accommodate retired or "senior" citizen residents may
apply to the District for a connection permit and pay the
connection charge as established in Subsection (6) above.
The developer-applicant must establish that all the criteria
have been met and that the city or county, as the
development approval authority, has certified the project as
providing low-cost housing accommodations for retired or
senior citizens.
The Board of Directors has absolute discretion and
authority to grant or deny the application based upon the
information provided and taking into consideration the
financial and engineering impacts upon the District and
upon the project."
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held this_day of , 1993.
n012UMW:pjM)
V 5
"W-S" AGENDA ITEM #34(b) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "W-5"
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 19 2, 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
APRIL 14, 1993
_ 0ITATfON
;Ai�e`o9°11mn OooIJl9
� set P O
0
N
Sioc. 195p
ONgNGE COUN
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanhation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 5.
7. 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on April 14, 1993,at 7:30 P.m.,in the
Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was
called and the Secretary reported B quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, B, 7, 11, 13 and 14
as follows:
ACME ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DIRECTORS
DWRICT NO. l: Roben Richardson, Chairman Thomas E. LuR
Fred Banera.Chairmen pm tam Gem Beyer
' James M. Ferryman Nate Meade
Thomas R. Sanarelli Leslie Fontious
Roger Samon William G. Stainer
• DISTRICT NO.2: Henry W.Wedaa, Chairman John M.Gueiason
John Collins, Chairman pro tam George Scott
a_ Fred Banera Gene Beyer
Bob Bell Barry Denes
• Burk Catlin Molly McClenelan
• Wiliam D. Mahoney James H.Flom
Maria Morem Norman Z. Eckenrade
L Carmy J. Nelsen Glenn Parker
try Pic*her Tom Daly
Miguel Pulieo _X Thomas E. Lutz
Roper Stanton William G.Steiner
George L.Baker Sheldon Singer
DISTRICT NO. 3: Sal A. Sapien, Chairman Don Maniner
Burnie Dunlap, Chairman pro tam y_ Caney J. Nelson
Buck Catlin Melly McClamhan
John Collin George Scott
James V.Evam Margie L Rice
X James H. Flora William D.Mahoney
_X Don R.Griffin Anhui Brown
Gail Kerry Cecilia L. Age
Frank Laszlo Gwen A. Forsythe
Thames E. Lutz RobW Richardson
• Eva G. Miner Wally Linn
• IN Rose, Tom Daly
Jim Silva lane Plainville
Sheldon Singer George L. Zlaket
y Roger Stanton William G.Steiner
y_ Charles Selina _ Ronald Bates
DISTRICT NO. S: L John C. Cos,Jr., Chairman Jan Debay
Phil Samam Jan Debay
William G.Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: . James A.Waller, Chairman Anhur Perry
. Evelyn Han.Chairman pro tam John C. Us,Jr.
y_ William G. Steiner _ Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.7: ,y_ tlanes E. Puckett, Chairman Thomas R. Saltarelli
• James A.Waller, Chairman pro tam Mike Schaefer
• Fred Banera Gene Beyer
• Jan Debay Phil Sansone
Barry Hammond Mike Ward
Too Morem Miguel Pulido
X William G. Steiner Roper Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 11: i_ Grace Wnchell, Chairman Eade Rubileille
z Victor Leipzig, Chairmen We tam Jim SING
i Roger Stanton William G. Steiner
eJ DISTRICT NO. 13: ,Jl_ John M.Guliason, Caiman _ Henry W. Wedge
i Fred Barrels.Chairman pro tam Gem Beyer
i Glenn Parker Burnie Dunlap
r X IN Romer Tam Daly
William G. Steiner Roper Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 14: Peer A. Swan,Chairman Dary[hiller
Leslie Pantious, Chairman pro tam Charles E. Puckett
Fred Banera Gene Beyer
v Berry Hammond Mike Ward
William G. Stein Roger Stanton
—2—
04/14/93
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manger,
Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes,
Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board
Secretary, Susan Bradford, Chris Cervellone,
Corinne Clawson, Patti Gorczyca,
Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, John Linder,
Margie Nellor, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten,
Mary Simpson, Ed Torres, Chuck Winsor,
Ray Young
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Edward Czuker, Harvey Hunt, Bill Knopf,
Jim Parker, Phil Stone
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file resolution of the
Board of Supervisors re change in That Resolution No. 93-252 from the Board
appointment of active and alternate of Supervisors re change in appointment of
representatives active and alternate representatives, be, and
is hereby, received and ordered filed, as
follows:
Districts Active Director Alternate Director
1,2,3 & 11 Roger R. Stanton William G. Steiner
5,6,7,13 & 14 William G. Steiner Roger R. Stanton
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed recently
Presentation of Districts' pin to new seated Director William Steiner to the Boards
Director and presented him with a pin bearing the
Districts' logo. The pin is similar to the
service pins given to employees and recognize the Directors for their service on the
Boards of the Sanitation Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the
Report of the Joint Chairman tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as
follows:
Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, April 21st, at 5:30 p.m.
Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee - Tuesday, April 27th, at 11:30 a.m.,
at the South Coast Air Quality Management District offices in Diamond Bar
Executive Committee - Wednesday, April 28th, at 5:30 p.m.
(Directors Barry Hammond and Frank Laszlo were also invited to attend.)
Personnel Committee - Thursday, April 29th, at 5:30 p.m.
-3-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager stated that he was
Report of the General Manager trying to schedule a second tour for the new
Directors who were unable to attend the
`.J orientation and treatment plant tour held on January 30th. He requested those
Directors to complete and turn in to the Board Secretary a form included in their
folders indicating alternative dates. Mr. Sylvester stated that once the tour date
was set, all Directors would be notified and are encouraged to attend.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments
Aooroval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments
Aooroval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments
Aooroval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
-4-
04/14/93
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District
claims set forth on pages "A" and "B"
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and
are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
03/10/93 03/24/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - S 677,448.08 $977,467.70
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,421,117.67 765,184.02
Joint Working Capital Fund - 179,797.23 483,815.16
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 1,988.14 219,122.16
DISTRICT NO. 1 - .00 58,477.70
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 332,769.99 35,648.62
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 301,248.87 13,380.71
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 83,994.99 8,750.59
DISTRICT NO. 6 - .00 29.51
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 40,098.12 11 ,147.61
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 1,149.30 5,275.06
DISTRICT NO. 13 - .00 .00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 929.85 45,943.50 °
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 23,221 .93 3,218.68
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,303.10 .00 ,
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 7,747.69 .00
- 53.073.814.96 52,627,461 .03 l /
-5-
04/14/y;
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Purchase of One Steam
Sterilizer Unit (Autoclave). That the bid tabulation and recommendation
Specification No. E-226 (Revised), to re award of Purchase of One Steam Sterilizer
�...� Amsco Scientific. Division of Unit (Autoclave), Specification No. E-226
American Sterilizer Company (Revised), be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Amsco
Scientific, Division of American Sterilizer Company, for a total amount not to
exceed $27,145.00 plus sales tax.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue a purchase
order to Hewlett-Packard for Purchase That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to
of Gas Chromatograph/Mass issue a purchase order to Hewlett-Packard
Spectrometer System, Specification Company in the amount of $62,000.00,
No. E-228 plus tax and freight, for Purchase of Gas
Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer System,
Specification No. E-228.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 4 to the
plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and
Nos. 1-9 and J-22-2 specifications for Interplant Pipeline
and Utility Corridor, Job No. 1-9, and
`...' Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-22-2, authorizing an
addition of $83,741 .00 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich and
Sons, for three items of additional work, granting a time extension of 14 calendar
days for completion of said additional work, and one item pertaining to a contract-
authorized sales tax adjustment, and one other contract adjustment, be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Director Collins stated that he believed many
Approving Change Order No. 20 of the items in change orders for this project
to the plans and specifications for and others are a result of inefficiencies or
Job No. J-19-1 inadequacies of the design engineer and
cited examples in Change Order No. 20. He
observed that although the change order cost for omitted work may not be any
more than would have been paid if included in the original bid, he was concerned
that there may be other incidental costs. He also noted that the contractor should
not be penalized or the work delayed because of these deficiencies. He asked that
staff include the name of the design engineer in the change orders and develop a
system to rate design engineers' proficiency to be considered in future work.
Director Collins then moved approval of Change Order No. 20 with the specific
recommendation that the design engineer's name be shown in the minutes for this
project.
-6-
04/14/93
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 20 to the plans and specifications for Central Power
Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, designed by Brown and
Caldwell, authorizing an addition of $53,586.00 to the contract with Hunter
Corporation for 12 items of additional work or other contract adjustments, be, and
is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is
Professional Services Agreement with hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum
John Carollo Engineers for design and No. 2 to the Professional Services
construction services. Preparation Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for
of operations and maintenance design and construction services,
manuals. and training services for preparation of operations and maintenance
Job Nos. P1-36 and P2-42 manuals, and training services re Secondary
Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1 , Job
No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, to
change the scope of work and to provide for additional design services to
investigate new technology for modifications to enhance advanced treatment
effectiveness and efficiency and provide operational flexibility and reliability.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to solicit proposals and negotiate a That the Selection Committee be, and is
Professional Services Aoreement for hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and
Job Nos. P1-46 and P2-55 negotiate a Professional Services Agreement
for engineering evaluation and design and
construction support services required for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility
Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility
Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with CH2M Hill for design That the Selection Committee certification
and programming services for Job of the final negotiated fee relative to the
No. J-31 Professional Services Agreement with CH2M
Hill for design and programming services
required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at
Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 93-37, approving said agreement with CH2M Hill for said services, on an
hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees
and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $690,148.00. Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-7-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Aoprovina Professional Services
Agreement with John Carollo That the Selection Committee certification
Enaineers to prepare plans and of the final negotiated fee relative to the
\.J specifications and to provide Professional Services Agreement with John
construction support services for Job Carollo Engineers to prepare plans and
Nos. J-33 and J-34 specifications and to provide construction
support services for Standby Power
Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Gutfall Reliability Upgrades, Job
No. J-34, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 93-38, approving said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said
services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed
$950,252.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy
and Executive Committee Committee's meeting and Executive
Committee's meeting held on March 17,
1993 and March 24, 1993, respectively, be and are hereby, received, ordered filed
and approved.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be
made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS
Discussion re Investment
Management Policy and Proposed
Reserve Repurchase Investment
Program
Verbal report of staff
The Districts' Financial Manager, Patti Gorczyca, reported that the Fiscal
Policy and Executive Committees are recommending revisions to the
Districts' investment management policy to implement provisions for reverse
repurchase transactions, subject to satisfactory resolution of any questions
by the Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector (County Treasurer( pertaining
to banking services provided by his office on behalf of the Districts. Based
on recent performance of the securities market, the Districts could expect to
earn approximately $1 .2 million annually from this program. The proposal
provides that the Districts would appoint a separate Treasurer and dealer to
manage the program, and the County Treasurer would continue to provide
other Treasury and investment services as in the past.
-8-
04/14/93
The office of County Counsel has reviewed the March 23, 1993, letter from
the General Counsel (included in the Directors' original April 14 agenda
package), which concluded that the Districts are empowered to appoint their
own Treasurer, who could be a person other than the County Treasurer, and
that there are no prohibitions or restrictions imposed on either the County
Treasurer or the Districts relating to the ability of the Districts to transfer
their funds to the County Treasury for purposes of deposit and investment,
or for the County to provide other Treasury services. County Counsel has
concurred with General Counsel's opinion. ,
Ms. Gorczyca further reported that the County Treasurer performs other
banking and investment services for the Districts and has since our
inception. General Counsel and County Counsel agreed that the County
Treasurer would not be impaired from continuing to provide both services
should the Districts decide to appoint a separate Treasurer. Those services
could be provided under a simple agreement between the Districts and the
County, but the County Treasurer expressed that he would be obligated to
charge a fee for these services as he would no longer be performing all of
the Treasurer functions. The County Treasurer has not yet determined an
appropriate charge, but has offered the Districts another alternative for
consideration.
Ms. Gorczyca reported that since the Executive Committee meeting, the
County Treasurer has offered to make the reverse repurchase investments
on behalf of the Districts for a $200 flat fee per transaction and referred
Directors to a letter dated April 12, 1993, from Robert L. Citron, included in
their meeting folders. The County Treasurer's alternative proposal provides �✓
the Districts with perhaps the best of both worlds. It supports the financial
goal of the Districts' reverse repurchase program, since it does allow us to
achieve the same improved yield on cash reserves as anticipated, and
actually reduces the costs of the program. If a separate Districts' Treasurer
were to engage in reverse repurchases, the Districts would incur costs of
custodial bank services considerably in excess of the $200 flat fee. Also, it
has always been the Districts' intent to carry out the reverse repurchase
program in partnership with the County Treasurer in order to tap the
established expertise of Bob Citron. Additionally, the Districts would retain
the benefit of all the Treasury services as currently provided by the County
Treasurer at no charge. The basic difference is that if the Districts were to
appoint a separate Treasurer, we would "direct" rather than "request" the
reverse repurchase investments and would need to negotiate a fee for other
banking services amenable to both the County Treasurer and Districts.
The Financial Manager advised the Board Members that based on the County
Treasurer's alternative proposal, if the Directors wished to proceed with the '
reverse repurchase program, the Joint Boards now had the option of either
approving the original proposal providing for the appointment of a separate ,
Districts' Treasurer and dealer to manage the reverse repurchase program, or
approving the County Treasurer's proposed alternative reverse repurchase
program.
-9-
04/14/93
Following a brief discussion, the following action was taken.
Authorizing the County
Treasurer to make reverse
repurchase investments on
behalf of the Districts
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the County Treasurer be, and is hereby, confirmed as the Districts'
Treasurer; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the County Treasurer be, and is hereby, authorized,
upon request by the Districts' financial staff, to make reverse repurchase
investments in U.S. Treasuries securities of a maximum amount of
$50 million, not to exceed ten-year maturities, and that payment of those
securities be made by reversing the securities against themselves; and
authorizing payment to the County Treasurer of a $200 flat fee per
transaction; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized
to confirm in writing with the County Treasurer, on behalf of the Districts,
this action of the Boards.
Directors A. B. Catlin and Roger R. Stanton requested that their abstention
from voting on this item be made a matter of record.
Authorizing lease of
Bloomberg financial reporting
system
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to lease the Bloomberg financial
reporting system to provide financial market monitoring to aid staff in
administering the reverse repurchase and other Districts' financial programs.
Directors A. B. Catlin and Roger Stanton requested that their abstention
from voting on this item be made a matter of record.
-10-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Fixed Floating Interest Rate
Swat) 0993 SWAM
Authorizing staff to proceed
with preliminary 1993 SWAP
structuring. utilizing
underwriters Merrill Lynch and
Paine Webber
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to proceed with preliminary
1993 SWAP structuring, utilizing underwriters Merrill Lynch and
PaineWebber on a fee contingency basis, subject to final authorization by
the Boards to conduct the transaction.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Directing staff and General
Counsel to submit a list of
three firms to provide special
bond counsel services
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, directed to submit a list
of three firms to provide special bond counsel services for the 1993 SWAP
for consideration by the Boards.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to Standard and
Poor's Rating Agency for
review of 1993 SWAP
structures
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to
Standard and Poor's Rating Agency for review of 1993 SWAP structures in °
an amount not to exceed $30,000.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record
-11-
04/14/93
Authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to Moody's
Rating Agency for review of
1993 SWAP structures
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to
Moody's Rating Agency for review of 1993 SWAP structures in an amount
not to exceed $30,000.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Advanced Refunding
Certificates of Participation. 1993
Series I
Authorizing staff and Merrill
Lynch to proceed with
preliminary steps necessary
to structure and bring to market
the 1993 Series I
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff and Merrill Lynch be, and are hereby, authorized to proceed with
preliminary steps necessary to structure and bring to market the 1993
Series I, on a fee contingency basis, subject to final authorization by the
Boards to conduct the transaction.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Authorizing staff and General
Counsel to submit a list of three
firms to provide special bond
counsel services
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized to submit a
list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services for the 1993
Series I for consideration by the Boards.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
12-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS `..�
Actions re Course of Construction
Master Program
Directing staff and Robert F. _
Driver Company to implement
the Master Course of
Construction Program
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff and Robert F. Driver Company be, and are hereby, directed to
implement the Master Course of Construction Program.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Appointing Zurich Insurance
Company as the insurance
carrier for the Master Course of
Construction Program
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Zurich Insurance Company be, and is hereby, appointed as the
insurance carrier for the Master Course of Construction Program, at an
estimated annual premium not to exceed $125,625.00 in accordance with
terms summarized below:
-13-
04/14/93
PREMIUM RATE: $.125 per $100 per year
LIMITS: $45,000,000 per Occurrence
Sublimits:
Earthquake: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence
and Annual Aggregate
Flood: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence and
Annual Aggregate
Transit: $500,000
Offsite Storage: $500,000
Debris Removal: $5,000,000
Expediting Expense: $250,000
Extra Expense: $1,000,000
DEDUCTIBLES:
All Other Perils: $10,000
Flood: $50,000
Earthquake: 5% of values at risk at time of
loss subject to $100,000 minimum.
TOTAL INSURABLE VALUES: $100,500,000
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
-14-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions relative to Biofiltration
Demonstration Project amending
November 18, 1992 actions
Authorizing the General
Manager to execute a grant
agreement with the Southern
California Edison Company -
for Partial funding
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the General Manger be, and is hereby, authorized to execute a grant
agreement with the Southern California Edison Company for partial funding
of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project in the amount of $50,000.00.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Authorizing the General
Manager to execute a
specific-term employment
agreement with Shabbir S.
Basra! for engineering services
Moved, seconded and duly carried: �..
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute a
specific-term employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering
services for the Biofiltration Demonstration Project for up to a twelve-month
period, at an hourly rate of $21 .63 per hour, for a maximum amount not to
exceed $45,000.00.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Authorizing staff to proceed
with the Biofiltration
Demonstration Proiect
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to proceed with the Biofiltration
Demonstration Project.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this _
item be made a matter of record. `
-15-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
report of the Building Committee That the written report of the Building
Committee's meeting held on March 18,
1993, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving plans and specifications
for Specification No. M-044 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Resolution No. 93-41 , approving plans and
specifications for Office Trailer Relocation at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification
No. M-044, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt
of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve the written
report of the Conservation. Recycle That the written report of the Conservation,
and Reuse Committee Recycle and Reuse Committee's meeting
held on March 25, 1993, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to complete
negotiations for an agreement with That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to
the OCWD providing uo to complete negotiations for an agreement with
50 mad of secondary effluent to the the OCWD, in form approved by General
OCWD for recycling purposes Counsel, that would provide up to 50 mgd
of secondary effluent to the OCWD for
recycling purposes at no charge, with a provision to, at any time, reevaluate the
valuation and pricing for secondary effluent; and to provide for purchase of GAP
water for 20 years at the audited cost to operate and maintain the GAP facility.
The contract would provide that the Districts' cost would not exceed the 0&M
cost or the lowest cost of any GAP customer, whichever is less.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to execute an
agreement with OCWD for pilot plant That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to
testing of UV light disinfection execute an agreement with OCWD for pilot
technology plant testing of UV light disinfection
technology, with estimated $160,000 costs
to be shared equally in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the Districts' portion
of out-of-pocket costs for outside consulting services, and $40,000 for the
Districts' in-house laboratory services.
-16-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions relative to Secondary
Treatment Expansion at Plant
No. 2. Job No. P2-42-2
Approving Addendum No. 1 to
the plans and specifications for
Job No. P2-42-2
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Secondary
Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, clarifying
miscellaneous mechanical and electrical items, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Addendum No. 2 to
the plans and specifications for
Job No. P2-42-2
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Secondary
Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, making miscellaneous
clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Addendum No. 3 to
the plans and specifications for
Job No. P2-42-2
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications, making changes to
the General and Special Provisions re Insurance Requirements, be, and is
hereby approved.
Awarding Job No. P2-42-2
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-42, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for
Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, to
Margate Construction, Inc., in the total amount of $14,496,000.00. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. '
-17-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions relative to Priority Projects
Element of Miscellaneous
Improvements to Facilities at Plant
No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1
Approving Addendum No. 1 to
plans and specifications for
Job No. P2-43-1
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Priority Projects
Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-43-1 , changing the bid date and establishing a date and time for job
walk, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Addendum No. 2 to
the plans and specifications for
Job No. P2-43-1
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Priority Projects
Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-43-1, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is
hereby, approved.
Awarding Job No. P2-43-1
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-43, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for
Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1 , to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount
of $3,398,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive. file and approve written
report of the Special Joint Works That the written report of the Special Joint
Selection Committee re Computers Works Selection Committee re Computers'
meeting held on March 30, 1993, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
v�
-18-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving the three-phase approach
for the Computerized Facilities That the three-phase approach for the
Records and Drawings Systems. Computerized Facilities Records and
Job No. J-25-1 Drawings Systems, Job No. J-25-1, be, and
is hereby, approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That preceding with implementation of three-phase approach,
be, and is hereby, authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Special Selection
Committee Re Computers to solicit That the Special Selection Committee Re
proposals and negotiate Professional Computers be, and is hereby, authorized to
Services Contract(sl solicit proposals and negotiate Professional
Services Contract(s) for the phased
approached for consideration by the Boards.
ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors of
General Counsel's Comments Prior to the need for a closed session as authorized
Closed Session by Government Code Section 54956.9 to
review:
11 Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and
general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to the co-generation
internal combustion engines.
2) Review of claim filed by Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, Attorneys
at Law and receive recommendation of General Counsel re possible litigation.
3) Review and consideration of possible settlement of enforcement action
initiated by Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Convene in closed se Sion pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at
8:30 p.m. pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s)
of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code
Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of
Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings.
ALL DISTRICTS At 9:50 p.m. the Boards reconvened in '
Reconvene in regular session regular session.
-19-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Denvina claim of Mudge Rose Guthrie
Alexander and Ferdon for additional That the claim of Mudge Rose Guthrie
fees for special Co-Bond Counsel Alexander and Ferdon for additional fees for
services re Advance Refundina special Co-Bond Counsel services re
Certificates of Participation. Advance Refunding Certificates of
1992 Series Participation, 1992 Series, be, and is
hereby, respectively denied.
Director Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a
matter of record.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Settlement Agreement
with Velie Circuits oertainina to That the proposed Settlement Agreement
Enforcement Action re Industrial with Velie Circuits pertaining to Enforcement
Waste Permit No. 6-1-144 Action re Industrial Waste Permit
No. 6-1-144, as recommended by staff and
General Counsel, be, and is hereby, approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager is hereby authorized to execute said
agreement, in form approved by General Counsel.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item
relative to Repairs and Modifications
�../ Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2.
Specification No. R-040
Verbal staff report
Director of Engineering, Tom Dawes, reported that recently staff did some
testing on two of the six new digester gas flares. One was tested at each
plant and it was discovered that the flares were not in compliance with
Districts' AQMD requirements, by a minor amount. Staff notified the South
Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as required, and a
variance was granted for 30 days to fix the two flares. The flares were
repaired under emergency staff authority, tested and are now operating
within the limits imposed by SCAQMD.
Mr. Dawes further reported that staff then began an inspection of the other
four flares and believes they are also in need of repair. The major work
needed is to replace burners, which actually melted down due to excessive
temperatures, and to modify certain controls which will change the air and
digester gas mix and burning temperatures. SCAQMD is being requested to
grant a second variance for the other flares.
-20-
04/14/93
Mr. Dawes stated authority was being requested to hire the burner
manufacturer, Sur-Lite Corporation, to do the repairs and to conduct monthly
inspections.of the burners while they are in operation, for up to two years.
It is expected that they will be taken out of service and placed in a standby
mode before the two-year period is up as the central generation facilities
should be brought on line by then.
Following a brief discussion, the following actions were taken.
Authorizing consideration of
Supplemental Agenda Item
relative to Repairs and
Modifications to Flares at Plant
Nos 1 and 2, Specification
No. R-040
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of a
supplemental agenda item relative to Repairs and Modifications to Flares at
Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040, which was not posted 72
hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request to take said
action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted.
Receive and file Staff Report
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report dated April 8, 1993, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed.
Authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to Sur-Lite
Corporation for Repairs and
Modifications to Flares at Plants
Nos. 1 and 2, Specification
No. R-040
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Sur-Lite
Corporation in an amount not to exceed $129,400.00 for Repairs and
Modifications to Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040.
-21-
04/14/93
DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to negotiate a Professional Services That the Selection Committee be, and is
Agreement with Boyle Enaineering hereby, authorized to solicit a proposal and
Corporation for the preparation of negotiate a Professional Services Agreement
plans and specifications for Contract with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the
No. 7-23 preparation of plans and specifications for
Gisler-Red Hill Parallel Force Main, from
College Avenue Pump Station to Iowa Street, Contract No. 7-23.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
-22-
04/14/93
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: -
Journment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with The Keith Companies That the Selection Committee certification
to design Contract No. 3-36R of the final negotiated fee relative to the
Professional Services Agreement with The
Keith Companies to design Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Mains (First
and Second Unitsl, and New Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract
No. 3-36R, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution
No. 93-44-3, approving said agreement with The Keith Companies for said
services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $85,683.00. ..✓
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Actions pertaining to request to
reduce sewer connection charges for
Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen
Apartments in the City of Stanton
Receive and file Staff Report
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report dated April 7, 1993, re Request for Consideration of
Reduced Connection charges for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen
Apartments in the City of Stanton, be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed.
-23-
04/14/93
Receive and file letter from
Jan Development Co.
reauesting reduction of
connection charges
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the letter from Jan Development Co. dated March 17, 1993, requesting
reduction of connection charges for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen
Apartments in the City of Stanton, be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed.
Receive and file letter from
District Chairman Sal Sapien
requesting consideration of
reduction of connection charges
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the letter four District Chairman Sal Sapien dated March 18, 1993,
requesting consideration of a reduction of sewer connection charges for Park
Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed.
Referring request to Fiscal
Policy Committee
Following a motion to have staff conduct a study on whether a reduction of
connection charges for low income and/or senior citizen housing is
appropriate, the General Counsel was asked to comment. Mr. Woodruff
reported that this is not the first time that a request of this nature has been
presented to the Districts, but none have been granted. There have been
similar requests in several of the other Districts. He pointed out that the
request is to reduce the sewer connection charges. These charges are
established by ordinances that are adopted after a variety of procedural
requirements have been satisfied. The ordinances have no provision for the
waiver or modification of any charges.
Mr. Woodruff pointed out that in order to effectively reduce the sewer
connection charges, the Board would need to conduct hearings and process
an ordinance amendment, which would probably include various findings
that would have to be made in order to justify the amendment.
-24-
04/14/93
He further advised that in the early 1970's and 1980's, the Districts
received certain grant monies under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
Hundreds of millions of dollars were received for the building of Plant 1 and
Plant 2 facilities. One of the statutory requirements under federal law was
that the Districts had to adopt a comprehensive revenue program. One
component of that program was that there be an established uniform, fair
and equitable levy of charges and assessments, and that all parties must pay
on a fair and equitable basis. He stated that if one property owner was
allowed to pay a lesser charge than all other owners in that area, the District
could be found in violation of the requirement which might jeopardize the
District's grant monies.
The Directors then entered into a discussion regarding the equitability of
connection charges, the financial impact on the District and other aspects of
reducing charges for some properties, and the uniformity of fee policies
among the several Districts. During the discussion the Chair also recognized
Mr. Edward Czuker, Vice President of Jan Development Company, the
project's developer, who addressed the Directors in support of his request
for a sewer connection charge reduction.
Following further discussion, a substitute motion was moved, seconded and
duly carried that the issue of reducing sewer connection charges for low
income and/or senior citizen housing be referred to the Fiscal Policy
Committee for review and report back.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
6
Assistant Siefitdry Althe Boards of Directors
of County S nation istricts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11 , 13 and 14
-25-
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE 3/G4/93 PAGE 1
PEP ORI NUMBLR AP 43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF GRAN 6E COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 03/16/93 RUST IN 0ATI uS/1L/93
i.l
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT ULSCPIPTION
1 , 128330 ASH BUSINESS MACHINES $044•8. SERVICE AGREEMENT
i.__ 128331 _ AMERICAN TELEPHONE L 1ELE6RAPH IL.5.3.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
126332 ADVANCED EBOTRE TECH CORP 315.710.00 ENGINE TESTING SSRYICES M.0.11-18-92
i . 128333 AIR CDLD SOFTLY INC 171.70 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS
120334 ALFA-LAVAL INC $170.44 BOOR
- " 128335- ALLIED SUPPLY CO $876.89 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
� .. 126336 BLAME P ANUERSON $144.91 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT
128337 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 34.13tl.41 NOTICES 6 ADS
128336 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS INC $145.71 LAB SUPPLIES
a.:, 128339 ABC LABORATORIES $235.90 LAB SERVICES
128340 ARATEA SERVICES INC 45,000.87 UNIFORM RENTALS
128341 ARMOR - VAC ie47.6u VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
128342 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC $494.15 WASTE HAULING FEES
128343 ART WORMS $18.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES
` - 120344 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $1,236.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
128345 AUTO SHOP EWUIPMENT CO 3506.43 TRUCK PARTS
128346 AWARDS 4 TROPHIES 3100.85 AWARDS 6 PLAQUES
128347 BFI PORTABLE SERVICES $85.31 - RENTAL EQUIPMENT
X ® 128348 BKK LANDFILL $7.G63.64 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
S 128349 SRW SAFETY 3 SUPPLY $1.133.86 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128350 BAKER PLYWOOD CC INC 31.927.13 BUILDING MATERIALS
�. 128351 BARCLAYS LAY PUBLISHERS $243.64 BOORS
128352 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $709.82 BATTERIES
a 128353 SAUER COMPRESSOR $684.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES
126354 BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 34.953.bl LAB SUPPLIES
�. 128355 BEACH PAVING INC. 44,200.00 PAVING SERVICES
128356 DON C BEATTIE P.E. $200.60 MACHINE REPAIRS
�. 128357 BELL SECURITY $15.766.50 TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES
128351 Y7 BILLARD INC $225:41 MACHINE REPAIRS
128359 - BI'SAFETY STETIMS. INC. 66837 - LAB SUPPLIES
128360 BISHOP COMPANY $212.45 TOOLS
128361 BUEHRINGER MANNHCIM $233.19 LAB SUPPLIES
128362 SOLER RADIATOR SERVICE 338.60 - - RADIATOR REPAIRS
0 I 128363 BOHNEMANN PUMPS. INC $22.903.26 PUMP PARTS
128364 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $35,973.85 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-20
126365 BRENNER-FIEDLER L ASSOC IN $173.41 PUMP PARTS
V 128366 BKOOKLVN TNERMOMETLA CU IN 3109.55 LAR SUPPLIES
128367 BUILDER-S EMPORIUM $L9.49 HARDWARR/LUMBER
126368" THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFF 3465.00 SUBSCRIPTION
��. 128369 BURKE ENGINEERING CO ic34.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS
128370 GARY G SYNCED $5,308.13 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
126371 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY $708.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128372 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS. INL $3,381.53 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128373 IS COMPANY 91.357.2i VALVE PARTS
128374 1993 CYPCA CONFLKENCE $2.23i.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
128375 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO INC $237.69 CHEMICALS
0
FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROLESSIN6 DATE 3/C4/93 PAGE 2
; L:,I REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CDUN TV
CLAIMS FAID 03/10/93 POSTING DATE 03/10/93
V � WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
I 120376 CALTROL INC 35..BU.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
128377 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $312.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128378 JOHN CAROLED ENGINEERS 39.161.45 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36
128379 CENTURY SAFETY INST 6 SUPP s8.696.05 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128388 BRUCE CHAFMAN 45,300•00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
120381 CLARK CONSULTANTS $3.48C.4: CONSULTING SERVICES
128382 COLICH AND SONS $962,241.60 CONSTRUCTION I-9
128383 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER 3585.b9 2-WAY RADIO EQUIPMENT
126304 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS Of CA $3.136.78 PUMP PARTS
126385 COMPUSA, INC. 5274.57 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
128386 CONNELL 69 PANTS / DIV 350.91 TRUCK PARTS
126387 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4.926.73 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
12838E CONSULIOA7LD FREIbHTWAYS S452.bb FREIGHT CHARGES
124389 CONTINENTAL AIR IDOLS INC $2,724.04 TOOLS
1 128390 ' CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 61.616.25 CHLORINE
I28391 CONTINENTAL GRAFHICS 3120.3. OFFICE SUPPLIES
128392 CONTROLCO s602.3N ELECTRIC PARTS
128393 COSTA MESA AUTO SUFFLY S5b4.24 TRUCK PARTS
X , 128394 COSTAR DORF $288.77 LAB SUPPLIES
_ 128395 COUNTY WHOLESALE LLECTRIC 459i.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
128396 CHARLES P CROWLEY CO $176.26 INSTRUMENT PARTS
lb 128397 DML INC $1,364.67 ENGINE PARTS
126398 D 6 S CONVEYORS 11.332.60 CONVEYOR REPAIRS
126399 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 9468.58 TIRES
y IS 128400 DAPPER TIRE $742.40 TIRES
1 126401 FLIER C DAVID CU $172.317.24 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2
n7 1284C2 PETER C DAVID CD S1O3.654.27 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2
128403 DEAVER MANUFACTURING CO. $327.05 TRUCK PARTS
128404 DECRA-TREND 3199.67 HARDWARE
128405 CC GUELLE 6 SONS GLASS CO S29.09 BUILDING MATERIALS
128406 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 33,750.51 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.6-12-92
128407 DIFILIPPO ASSUCIAILS $677.21 PRINTING
120408 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT COOP 3751.04 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
126489 SVCON CORP $137.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128416 DISCO PRINT LOMPANY $2.136.94 OFFICE FURNITURE
128411 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN $13:810.86 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL
128412 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $44972.1E PLANT MAINTENANCE A REPAIRS
120413 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY 4620.09 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128414 OURO-SENSE CORP 3177.bB MECHANICAL PARTS
128415 EASTMAN INC 12,940.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES
228416 ECOANALYSIS INC 6220.04 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91
128417 ECONOMICS PRESS INC 32.704.60 PUBLICATIONS
12B41B EDUCATIONAL DCVELOPHENT SPLC 1659.66 EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS
128419 ELECT AIR TOOL CU $2.973.64 MECHANICAL PARTS
128420 ELECTRU DYNAMIC SERVICES $3,220.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ELECTRICAL
128421 INCH AN TEA 1 $4.480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92
/ 1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL Pk OLLSSINN DATE 3/U4/93 PAGE 3
-,4 REFORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID E3/]O/93 POSTING DATE 63/14/93
I!
Y AR0.ANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
128422 ESSENCE GROUP $399.21 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
128423 CHARLES EVANS L ASSOC. S112,041.00 LAB SERVICES M.0.11-I8-92
128424 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICL $3,640.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
128425 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP 396.60 AIR FREIGHT
- �. 128426 FISCHER Y PORTER CO 55.253.6b CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
128427 FISHER SCIENIIFIC CO 68r6U4.27 LAB SUPPLIES
128428 FISONS INSTRUMENTS 5262.91 LAB SUPPLIES
128429 FLO-SYSTEMS $5,296.07 PUMP PARTS
128436 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS s126.Lu PUMP PARTS
128431 FLUID TECH $956.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
,., 128432 FOLSOM LAKE FORD $10,506.24 VEHICLE M.O.4-8-92
128433 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 5705.63 FILM
128434 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $243.41 PAINT SUPPLIES
128435 FOR INDUSTRIAL SALES 5170.12 MECHANICAL PARTS
228436 THE FOXBORO CO 33,744.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS
128437 FREEDOM IMAGING $57.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128438 CITY OF FULLERTON s25.53 WATER USE
m 128459 GANAHL LUMBER CU $2.128.77 HARDWARE
X 128440 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY $1,943.81 CHEMICALS
128441 GALES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS sl.bG0.0u PUMP PARTS
128442 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 31.021.5E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
' 128443 GENERAL TELEPHONE CU 3224.30 TELEPHONE SERVICES
j RE 128444 LIFE TECHNOLOGILS/618CO/BHL $168.76 LAB SUPPLIES
n 128445 GIERLICH-MIICHLLL INC $4.416.54 MECHANICAL PARTS
• 128446 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTOKS a330.80 FILM
W 120447 DUN GREEK 3 ASSOCIATES $2,245.O, SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92
128448 - HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO $875.3V TRUCK PARTS
128449 HACH COMPANY 51.696.09 LAB SUPPLIES
128450 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTI 5136.43 SCRUBBER PARTS
' 128451 PC HAWN CO INC $302.09 ELECTRIC PARTS
_ 126452 HOEMBIGER CVS CALIF INC 5586.29 COMPRESSOR PARTS
128453 RS HUGHES CO INC 42,709.25 PAINT SUPPLIES
128454 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11.032.50 WATER USE
128455 HUNTINGTON BEACH HUBBEG STA S10.bb OFFICE SUPPLIES
120456 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL SJ6.55U.66 FERRIC CHLORIDE H.O.11-18-92
120457-"" INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION HUYTHS 4133.00 EDGED
TV 12845N INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SHOE CO. 33.595.Lb SAFETY SHOES
128459 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $668.56 CONNECTORS
128440 INGRAM PAPER $1,266.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128461 IRVINE RANCH ATER DISTRICT S160.94 WATER USE
128462 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY $OPP 5685." JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
228463 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO $105.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS
. 128464 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $156.43 ELECTRIC PARTS
120465 JONES CHEMICALS INC 62,165.69 CHEMICALS
` .. 120466 JORDAN CONTROLS INC $78.46 INSTRUMENT
128467 KELLY PIPE CO $737.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING TAIL 3/64/93 PAGE 0
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OE ORANGE COUNTY
.� CLAIMS PAID 63/14193 POSTING DATE 03/14/93
�I
WARRANT NO. YLNDUR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
/? 12P068 KING BEARING INC $4,234.14 MACHINE SUPPLIES
228469 KNOX INUUbTRIAL SUPPLIL4 11.398.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128470 MARTIN KOROICK SR 52.841.9G CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
128471 LA IRONIC$ 5416.19 CAMERA
126472 LAYMAN. JONES 6 DYE. LAWYERS $1.615..5 LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER INDUSTRIES
228473 LEGI-TECH s320.11O COMPUTER SERVICES
128474 LECO CORPORATION $962.99 LAB SUPPLIES
128475 LEWCO ELECTRIC Cu s3a4.6E TRUCK PARTS
128676 - ' LIEBERT CORPORATION $364.14 FREIGHT
126477 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 5139.904.LL POOLED EMIR. ESTIM. PLAN H.O.12-13-89
12897E NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $933.33 OCEAN MONITORING
128479 MPS 51b.96 PHOTOGRAPHIC 3ERVICE8
12868E MACOMCO 6320.bb SERVICE AGREEMENT
128481 AA6NETEN NATIONAL LLECTRIL 31,657.13 ELECTRIC PARTS
126482 MAN T IN 6323.02 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
126483 MARVAC ELECTRONICS a150.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
120484 MATT - CHLOR INC $7.856.96 VALVE PARTS
RI 128485 MCCOV SHEET METAL MONKS IN 3189.64 ELECTRIC PARTS
X 128466 MICNOAGE of CENR/TUS $3.527.14 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
= 128487 MIDWAY MFG A NACHININ4 $2.370.50 MECHANICAL PARTS
128408 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES 3190.82 FITTINGS
� . 1284999 MISSION INDUSTRIES $1,724.64 SAFETY SUPPLIES
I2P190 MTTC HELL INSTRUMENT CO 3969.60 ELECTRIC PARTS
128391 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION s197.106.66 CONSTRUCTION 2-30
Om • 128392 NATIONAL FIRE PNOTLCTIOU AS 1509.22 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128693 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICLS INC s750.0U VACUUM TRUCK SERVICE8
128494 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL •138.70 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
. 128495 CITY OF NLWPORI BEACH 32a.2u WATER USE
128496 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICLS 3515.51 SAFETY GLASSES
128497 THE ONMAR7 CORP $1,292.15 INSTRUMENT PARTS
12B490 D1 SISTLM$ CO 334.♦61.Ob CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91
128499 ORACLE CORP OX AT ION 3100.Gs TRAINING REGISTRATION
120500 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL $131.59 ELBC7 RIC SUPPLIES
120501 ORANGE COAST PETROLEUM LLUIF 3340.66 TRUCK PARTS
128502 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO TANIS C $61.20 TRUCK PARTS
128503 ORANGE COURIER $267.0C FREIGHT
' 128504 ORANGE VALVE t fl ill6G CO. $1.229.22 FITTINGS
128505 ORGANON TEKNIKA S1u2.36 LAB SUPPLIES
128506 OR"El TONP $1.842.10 PUMP PARTS
121507 OKYGEN SLRYICL fa.041.90 SPECIALTY GASES
128508 COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICT 31.900.14 WORKERS COMP INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
128509 PSI s1S3.62 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
128510 PSSI 31.32b.50 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
125511 FACIFIC FARTS S449.31 INSTRUMENT
128512 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 51.195.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES
129513 PACIFIC BELL 3453.1E TELEPHONE SERVICE8
f
e
FUND NO 9159 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROLESSIN4 DATE 3/W4/93 PAGE 5
RLPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COON TT
CLAIMS PAID u3/10193 POSTING DATE 03/19/13
LI 'I
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
G; - 128514 PACIFIC PATEN CONDITIONIND C $68.96 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
W _ 122515 PACTLL MER101AN SYSTLMS 51.627.:. TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
128526 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPP $2,492.79 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
120517 PAX WEST $1.13208 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
128518 PALMIERI, TILER, WILNER, SM63.65 LEGAL SERVICES 14-1-1A
120519 PARAGON CABLE L36.78 CABLE SERVICES
12tl520 PERXIN-LLMER CORPORATION i5u1.15 LAB SUPPLIES
128521 PIINkT BOWES 4530..4 SERVICE AGREEMENT
` 125522 PITNEY BOWLS CPEUII LORP 5183.18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE
128523 POLYMETH ICS. INC. 31.436.U5 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128524 POLYFURE INC 51/.268.19 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
128525 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO $161.75 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
9 228526 PRECISION GLASS 'LOVING 3228.40 LAB SUPPLIES
128527 HAROLD PA
IMF OS F. ICL $126.00 ICE
128528 THE FROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $4,960.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
120529 RPM ELECTRIC M07UKS 32.330.83 ELECTRIC PARTS
128530 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO 43.138.82 TRASH REMOVAL
128531 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO $121.47 LAB SUPPLIES
X 0 128532 RECYC INC $29 a61.95 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.G.3-13-91
_ 128433 REMOTE LILA RESETTING. SY'S/ 55.000.00 POSTAGE
128534 COMMUNITY BUSINESS WRAPHICS S1c5.10 PRINTING
TA 128535 NCJUNKIN-REFUSLIC SUPPLY 61.926.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
128536 RESEARCH FROOUCIS IN T. CORP $73.96 LAB SUPPLIES
128537 REYES ENUINELRINL CO 34.868.75 HARDWARE
y Ap 12853E RICH COLOR LAD $29.63 PRINTING
I 128539 ROCKWELL E114INLERIN6 L EWUIF S1H52.60 MACHINE PARTS
LP 120540 RODNEY-HUNT CO 13.733.54 BAR SCREEN PARTS
128541 ROSEMOUNT INC. 5929.69 ELECTRIC PARTS
128542 RTAN-HERCO $4,608.73 ELECTRIC METER
128543 SAFETY-XLEEN CORP 12,653.61 PARTS CLEANER
128544 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1,132.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
128545 SANVA DANK 4b3.0I2.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30
126546 DOUG SARVIS 61,125.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
126547 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INPL $31i.658.55 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92
126548 SCIMED A CORP )156.50 LAB SUPPLIES
128549 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES INC 5733.7H SAFETY SUPPLIES
128550 SEA COAST DESIGNS SL.6L5.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128551 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 5723.U6 LAB SUPPLIES
128552 SNASTA ELECTRIC S1C.593.UJ OFFICE EQUIPMENT
� . 120553 SHURFLUCK SALES $2,143.12 HARDWARE
126554 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION 5397.50 LAB SUPPLIES
-' - 128555 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO 4269.09 LAS SUPPLIES
128556 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI $864.6G PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
228557 SLIDE MASTER $77.58 PRESENTATION AIDS
125558 SMITH PIPE S SUPPLY INC Si75.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
128559 SO COAST AIN QUALITY $15.056.00 PERMIT FEES
7
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3104/93 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
_ _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Si CLAIMS FAID 43/10/93 POSTING DATE 63/16/93
• WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT Ut SCPIPi ION
' � • 128560 SCAOMD UPDATE TRAINING i125.L.. TRAINING REGISTRATION
128561 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 525.696.82 POWER
120562 SO CAL GAS CD $40,604.67 NATURAL OA8
126563 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CU $1,314.86 DIESEL FUEL
., 128564 SOUVENIR PHOTO $19.55 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
120565 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER $2.25 DRINKING WATER/COOLBR RENTALS
126566 SPARLIN4 INSTRUMENT CO INC i2.969.15 METER
128567 STAMEN 2 SPASSOff FL 35.950.40 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-29-182
129568 YESTALLOY INC 91.043.35 HARDWARE
128569 SPEAKER SUPPORT $72.73 PRESENTATION AIDS
128570 SPEK INDUSTRIES INC . 3579.39 LAB SUPPLIES
-' 126571 SACCO FLEAIBLE $484.96 TRUCK PARTS
128572 STANCO.S VACUUM SERVCE 31.072.57 VANUM TRUCK SERVICES
128573 JAMES STANFILL CONSTRUCTION i1000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
128574 STEMMERS THEE SERVICE $600.00 LANDSCAPING
128575 SUNN IT STEEL 4984.84 METAL
128576 SUPELCO INC 9103.31 LAB SUPPLIES
12857T SUPER CHEM COOP 32.L4A.iy CHEMICALS
X * 128575 SUPER ICE CORP 382.82 LAB SUPPLIES
= 128579 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMPANY $920.33 TRUCK PARTS
128500 TECH SYSTEMS $211.53 TRUCK PARTS
CD 12BSB1 CM AR LES E THOMAS 3818.21 TRUCK PARTS
128582 THUN PEON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 31.968.24 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
128583 TDNY.S LOCH A SAFE SLRVI CC 4268.71 KEYS AND LOCKS
Oa , 128584 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL 3479.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES
I 128585 TUTU LANDSCAPING CO 37.238.77 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.11-13-91
128586 WESTRONICS 3125.98 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
. 120587 TRAVEL EXECUTIVLS 3138.40 TRAVEL SERVICES
128565 TRAVEL TRAVEL $143.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
128589 TRUCK E AUTO SUPPLY INC $1,552.66 TRUCK PARTS
128590 JG TUCKER A SON INC $2.507.67 INSTRUMENT
120591 UHLER. INC S1U2.065.65 CONSTRUCTION 5-32
126592 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $269.09 LAB SUPPLIES
d 128593 UNOCAL $121.52 UNLEADED GASOLINE
128594 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $400.30 PARCEL SERVICES
- 12S595 DATAVAULT 0 S SAFE DEPOSIT LO. 31.405.LL COMPUTER DATA STORAGE
12859E VG/F1SIONS INSTRUMENTS $9,299.53 LAB EQUIPMENT
128597 VYR SCIENTIFIC $6,979.67 LAB SUPPLIES
128599 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 46.678.47 PLUMBING PARTS
I „ 120599 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS 3696.VT OFFICE SUPPLIES
128600 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $164.29 LAB SUPPLIES
128601 VARNCR ACOUSTICS. INC. Sl.4C5.44 BUILDING MATBRIALS
. 128f C2 VAUGHAN COMPANY $4,961.25 PUMP PARTS
128603 VERNE-S PLUMBING 3230.0L PLUMBING SERVICES
16 12860R VERTEX SYSTEMS $8,037.50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
i 128E G5 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL f19.91 BOOK
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PhOCESSING GATE 3/04/93 PAGE 7
N EPURT NUMNLR AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF URAN6E 'COON TY
� CLAIMS PAID 03/16/93 POSTING DATE 43/14/93
,I WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT 3ESCAIPTION
^, 126606 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEU. $29.69 PUBLICATION
-•i 126607 WESTERN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY 43.1b6.69 MRCMARICAL REPAIRS
' 128688 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY Si4.982.90 CAUSTIC SODA 14.0.8-12-92
128609 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY $110.42 PUBLICATION
126610 WITE6 4515.7E LAB SUPPLIES
128611 - ROURKE S WGDDRUFF S ON 156,152.50 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92
120612 XEROX COOP s1V.G09.39 COPIER LEASES
126613 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $642.74 VALVES
- - 228614 GEORGE YARDLEY CO S356.74 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
128615 JOHNSON YOKOGAVA CORP $868.63 CHART PAPER
.. 128616 ZIEPARTH S ALPER/C.S. ALPER $16,096.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1
. _ . -----------------
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 03/10/93 S3.073.814.9b
SUMMARY AMOUNT
X ! R2 OPER FUND $404.99
_ N2 CAP PAC PUSH) $332,365.00
t R3 OVER FUND $25,267.36
03 CAP PAC FUND $275,982.51
1 _ R5 OVER FWD $2,026.94
a 05 CAP FAC FUND $82,968.05
07 OVER EDGE) $4,029.23
V 07 CAP FAC FUND $36,069.89
012 OPEN FUND $821.30
011 CAP PAC FUND $328.00
014 OFOR FUND $66.00
424 CAP FAC FUND $863.85
j 0586 OPBR FUND $4,079.98
056E CAP FAC FUND $19,142.95
' 0667 OPER FUND $2,303.10
47614 OVER FUND $7,747.69
JT OVER FUND $677,448.08
-" CORP $1,421,117.67
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $1,988.14
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $179,797.23
a. $3,073,824.97
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WURKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3118/93 PAGE 1
{ li REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF 0RANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATE 03/24/93
.JAI
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
120651 46 TECH COMPANY $107.149.99 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.10-9-91
128652__ A T 6 T 53.820.73 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES .
128653 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC $150.00 LAB SERVICES
128654 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES $420.60 CHILLER REPAIRS
128655 AIR PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL IN 634.1164.6, OAK AGREEMENT CRY. GEN. SYST M.O.8-9-8!
_
128656 ALLIED SUPPLY CO 51.258.15 VALVE
so 128657 AMBER STEEL COMPANY f6U.0O PLAN 6 SPECS REFUND
128658 _ AMERICAII TYFE CULTURE COLLLLIN $99.75 LAB SUPPLIES
128659 - - AMENSHAM CORP $326.70 LAB SUPPLIES
128660 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 3664.01, EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS - DIST 7
�••_ _ 126661 ANIATER - DISTRIBUTION $426.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES
- 128662 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL 6230.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128663 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 1374.79 NOTICES 6 ADS
128664 APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS INC $4,649.73 LAB SUPPLIES _. .
_ 126665 ACS UPPLIEO COMPUTER SOLUTION $145.68 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
128666 ABC LAB ORA TOF IES 31.395.00 LAB SUPPLIES
�•/ 128661 _ ARATEK SERVICES INC $2.56 UNIMPRI SERVICE
m 12866E ANENS INDUSTRIES INC 33.643.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
>< 120669 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT f2.E91.Ji INSTRUMENT
120670 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC 9450.U0 - WASTE HAULING PEE
tz 128671 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERY. $130.00 MASTS OIL REMOVAL
1p'. 128672 ARIA 512.803.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES M.0.1-13-92.
_ 128673 _ ATCHISON TOPEKA 6 SANTA FL MR $150.00 SUPPLY AGREEMENT
t" 126674- AUTOMATIC DATA PRGCLSSIN6 $7.553.25 PAYROLL PROCESSING SERVICES
1 94 128675 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC $518.29 TRUCK PARTS
1-- 129676 BKK LANDFILL 32.766.46 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.30-9-91 _
128677' - ERN SAFETY 8 SUPPLY 347.05 SAFETY SUPPLIES
�~ 128678 BANANA BLUEPRINT $15.465.79 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES
128679 BANK GF AMERICA $1,203.67 _ DEFERRED COMP TRANSFER _
128680 - BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS $177.26 PUBLICATION
126681 B BATEMAN 0675.U0 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
_ 128692 BAITLRY SPECIALTIES $546.16 BATTERIES
128683 - BAUER COMPRESSOR 3190.64 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS' "
i . 126684 BARTER DIA6M06TICS INC $7,412.66 LAB SUPPLIES
120665 _ BEACH PAVING INC. 619.775.U6 _ PAVING SERVICES
126661 - BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS 69.347.38 LAB SUPPLIES
128681 BELL SECURITY $3.888.75 TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES
128688 010-PAD LABORATORIES $161.07 LAB SUPPLIES
120689 BIOR E CLARA 110N SYXPOSIUN $550.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
��. 128690 BORNEMANN PUMPS. INC $12.810.6: PUMPS
• 1_ _ ___12869! BOVLE ENGINEERING CURP $5,099.35 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-19
128692 BRLNNER-FIEULER 6 ASSOC IN $212.67 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
128693 bRITHINEE LLECTRIG 91.026.59 ELECTRIC PARTS
128694 BROWN AUTOMATION $2.272.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
L -- 120695 _- - BUILDERS EMPORIUM 6201.26 HARDWAR6/LUMBER
128696 BURKE ENGINEERING CO $774.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CUUNTV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
�r CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATE 63/24/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
II � 128697 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC 312.148.OJ SURVEY SERVICES RKS S-051
i.� 120698 BUSINESS LAWS INC $53.00 BOOK
_ 128699 GARY G STREED 52.35b.84 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
128700 CRC PRESS INC $87.45 BOOKS
128701 CS COMPANY $4,248.10 VALVE
128702 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC Sbb%.85 TRUCK PARTS
40 128743 CALIF SOCIETY OP MUNILIPAL S85.O6 MEMBERSHIP DUBS
__.._ 1287G4 CARLETON ENGINEERS 611.326.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
120705 CENTURY SAFETY INST S SUPP S2.651.65 SAFETY SUPPLIES
122TOG CHURCH ENGINEERING INC $5.109.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-RI
128707 COLE-PARKER INSTRUMENT CO $344.53 LAB SUPPLIES
128708 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA ss.078.56 MECHANICAL PARTS
128709 COMPUSA. INC. S987.85 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
128714 CONNiLL GM PARTS / DIY 3120.38 TRUCK PARTS
126721 - CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL UIST $12.025.29 ELECTRIC PARTS - -
128712 CONTINENTAL AIR IDOLS INC $5,346.39 TOOLS
128713 CONTROL CABLES INC S196.67 TRUCK PARTS
128714 - CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $5,740.63 CONSULTING SERVICES
X 128715 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS s1.271dO TRUCK PARTS
_ _ 126726 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW MAINT. $2.250.D0 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES
_ 128717 CAL POLY KELL06G UNIT $215.50 TRAINING RBGISTMTION
IA4 12STIS STATE WATER RESOURCES CO6Tk OL $6.72 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEES
128719 DAILY PILOT 640.u0 NOTICES 6 ADS
—1 - 128720 J.Y. D'ANGELO CO INC $7,515.57 PIPE
128721 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.06 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
128722 DEAVER MANUFACTURING CO. $19.84 TRUCK PARTS
N - 128T23 DELTA TECH SERVICE INC 314.008.85 HIGH VOLUME OIL FLUSH
IN 126724 DE2URIK AND/OM CS CO 311,260.35 VALVE
198725 DIFILIP'PO ASSOCIATLS $2,395.58 _ PRINTING
128726 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 49.953.60 - SERVICE AGREEMENT
126727 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN S1.774.51 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL
128728 DORADO ENTERPRISLS INC $11,582.99 _ PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
128729 -" ROBERT'F DRIVER ASSOC 320.D00.00 INSURANCE DEPOSIT
'! 128730 DUNN EDWARDS CORP $787.72 PAINT SUPPLIES
_128731 EASTMAN INC S4.659.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES
_ 126732 ECOANALYSIS INC S5.OB1.09 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91
128733 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES $3,680.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - ELECTRICAL
128734 EMED S67.5B SAFETY SUPPLIES
- - 128735 ENCHANTER INC 35..40.00 OCEAN MONITORING 6-10-92
128736 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC $862.00 LAB SERVICES
12673T MARSHALL FAIRRLS 5128.L8 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128738 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 15.200.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
r♦ 128739 FEDERAL LKPkLSS CORP 4185.75 AIR FREIGHT
128740 FERKELLGAS 4122.58 PROPANE
128741 FISCHER A PORTER CO $6,782.68 CHLORINATION PARTS
228742 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO S.7.635.45 LAB SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PRDCESSIN6 DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 3
; .• REPORT NUMBER AP43
I` COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICTS OF ORAN6E COUNTY
!d CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATE 63/24/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
128743 FISONS INSTRUMENTS 5126.64 LAB SUPPLIES
128199.. FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. f159.0u CONCRETE CUTTING
_ •i - 120796 FLO-SYSTEMS $8,157.46 MECHANICAL PARTS
128146 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS s76.05 PUMP PARTS
128747 FLUID TECHNOLOGIES $265.25 OIL TESTING SERVICES
126746 CLIFFORD A FORKLRT $6.412.25 SURVEYING SERVICE SPEC 9-051
oll 128749 FOSS MARITIME CO $1,061.66 JANITORIAL SERVICES
128750 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $299.78 FILM
128751 FOUNTAIN VALLEY - PAINT 1243.87 PAINT SUPPLIES
Amp. 128152 BUD FRET $21.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
220753 CITY OF FULLERTON $30.6. WATER USE
-128754 GANAHL LUMBER CO $301.98 LUMBER/NARDWARE
i 128755 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS 16.963.56 PIPE
120756 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 9172.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
120757 - GENERAL TELEPHONE CO 44.554.65 TELEPHONE SERVICES
128758 TOM GERLINGER ab.000.ou DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
128759 _ N GLANT2 6 SON $26.96 PAINT SUPPLIES
128760 - GOVaT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $355.06 MEMBERSHIP DUES
fYl 126761 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $233.23 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
X 12ST62 _ GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $5.626.25 FILM
2 r- 128763 - HSU TECHNOLOGY $152.624.88 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2
w 128769 FRED A HARPER 31,500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128765 __ _ HARE IN610N INGO$TRIAL PLASTI .1,682.68 VALVE
1 i.f 126T66 BASCO OIL CO INC S147.40 OIL 6 GREASE
A 128767 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS 11.620.Oa CONTAINER RENTALS
_ 128760 _ PL HAWN CO INC $1.940.36 FILTERS
' -�-- 124770 - - HEW1E HAYCOCK CKA .111.00 SERVICE
AGREEMENT - -
lN Y' 128771 HEYLE T7 PACKARD f1$197.78 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128771 __ HILTI INC 5197.7E TOOLS
CK
�• 126773 MI STANDARDAUTOMOTIVE 181.89 TRUCK PARTS
_ 126773 HOCNHUSHE CVO CALIF INC 5125.75 COMPRESSOR PARTS
12P771 _ RS ER CORPORATION
CO INC ".590.75 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
�. 128716 HUNTER CORPORATION f159.$27.80 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1
+,. 128777 HUNTINGTON BEACH HOUSES
SCHWI SlA 130.13 OFFICE 9UPPLIEB
_ 126777 RUNT IN4TON PALLET SCMYINM L a130.50 INSTRUMENTATION
PARTS
-- 126779 ISC 39.O28.SU - INSTRUMENTATION CONSULTING
128780 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL i69.$95.3C FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.I1-18-92
120781 INDUSTRIAL TMNEAOEO PRODUCTS 260.03 CONNECOFFICETORS
UP
-' 129782 - INTERN PAPER - $280.33 - OFFICE SUPPLIER
_. 120783 JLAINTERSTATE BATTERY SYS TE NS 11.087.3V BATTERMICROFIEB
�.. _ 128784 JLA CREDIT CORP f195.32 MICROFICHE: READER LEASE
128789 6ALAT WESTERN SANITARY SVhP $393.38 JANITORIAL MEETINGS
128786 JENSE CATERING 3910.. HIRDCTORB' MEETING EXPENSE
196787 _ JENSEN SUSPENSION
INSTRUMENTS CO 5$50.33 TRUCKHARDWARE
129708 - JAMS SBEARINGS I VICE 392.56 TRUCE REPAIRS ""- --
�F 12818E KAM AN BEARINGS • SUPPLY 592.Stl INeTRVNeNT SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING, CAPITAL PROCESSING DAIL 3/18/93 PAGE 4
i Ul REPOhT NUMBER AP43
.. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ONAN6E COUNTY
AEI
CLAIMS PAID 63/24/93 POSTING DAIL u3/14193
WARRANT NO. VENDOR ANOINT DESCRIPTION
11..i 126765 KARCHER INSULATION INC $1.900.06
!.` 128190 KEENAN A ASSOCIATES $2.475.60 ELECTRIC PARTS
129791 KING BEARING INC S4.452.41 SAFETY SUPPLIES
1 . 120792 KNOW INDUSTRIAL SUPPLILS $4.423.11 MACHINE SUPPLIES
128793 MARTIN KOROICK SN $2,900.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128794 LA CELLULAh TELEPHONE CO 869.4E CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
r 128795 LEE L RO CONSULTING LN4N $11.306.24 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
126796 KP LINDSTROM INC 64.932.b0 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5
128797 SOLO-LYNCH CORP 6156.26 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL
122798 MPS 42b1.64 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
126799 MAC00NALD-STEPMENS LAB $11.210.00 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
128800 MACOMCO S520.65 LAB SERVICES
128801 MARVAC ELECTRUNILS S62.6S SERVICE AGREEMENT
126862 MATT CHLOR INC 67.164.32 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
-4 - 128803 MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS $41.72 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
228804 MICRO NOTION S1.431.27 LAB SUPPLIES
128805 MIDWAY MFU B MACHINING $12.647.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
. 128806 MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES Cu 4a25.82 BUILDING REPAIRS
128867 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES 6472.41 SAFETY SUPPLIES
_ ! 128008 JAMES M MONTGOMERY 41u2.721.9b WELDING SUPPLIES
128609 ON MONTGDMERY ENGINEERS $3.124.28 ENGINEERING SERVICES H.0.12-12-90
228810 TON MOORE $3.975.08 ENGINEERING SERVICES
120811 NATIONAL PLANT SERYICLS INC S1.567.54 CONSULTING SERVICES
128812 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 469.35 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
Lb , 128E 13 NENARK ILEC IRUNICS 6126.b4 SAFETY FILM RENTAL
J- ' 128814 OCR REPROGRAPHICS INC 6121.22 ELECTRIC PARTS
126815 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERYICLS SIG5.44 LAB SUPPLIES
- 128B16 OFFICE PAVILION/INTENIUN WES 47.Ob2.b9 SAFETY GLASSES
_ 128817 DX SYSTEMS CO S29.633.42 OFFICE PARTITIONS
128818 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL $36.71 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91
128819 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C 6344.9b ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
_ 12RE20 OMANGE COUNTY FARM SUFPLY C 478.96 TRUCK PARTS
128821 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. S1.444.27 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES
i:• 128822 OXYGEN SERVICE 62.611.01 FITTINGS
1266.3 COUNTY SANITA7ION DISTRICT S3.6I1.17 SPECIALTY GASSES
128324 CSOOC SELF-FU14UED MEDICAL I 6240.006.60 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
j 126825 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 67.bB7.39 PREMIUM ADVANCE
128826 R06ERi L CITRON 6108.66 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT
128827 PACIFIC PARTS 33.931.41 92/93 PROPERTY TAX
128828 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 5876.83 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
�• 12BR 29 PACIFIC BELL SS1.68 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128830 PACIFIC VATER CONDITIONING C 36B.40 TELEPHONE SERVICES
128831 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSILMS $429.19 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
120632 PRUKL JANITORIAL SUPP 6462.72 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
12SO33 PAGLNET $67.5. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
!' 128834 PAK VEST 9547.10 PAGER RENTAL
�• JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
A
r`
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE 311E I93 PALL 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
LLAIMS PAID U:/24/93 POSTING DATE 03/24/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
!! IR8835 FARKSON CONPUNATION $644.51 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
128836 PARTS UNLIMITED 11.550.7i TRUCK PARTS
128837 STEVE PELLETIER 68.500.V6 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
128630 ROY PENDER6RAFT 4460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128839 PERKIN-ELMLR CUhPURATION 35.469.53 LAB SUPPLIES
128840 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS INC 1195,885.44 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.5-8-91
128041 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $69.88 HARDWARE
126642 POLVPURE INC >28.133.65 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-I1-92
120043 PORVENE ROLL-A-DOOR 3127.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
128044 POWER ELECTXO SUPPLY CO 1136.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
128845 PRECISION INDUSTRIES $402.22 HARDWARE
120046 PRESENTATION Pk00UCTS 3806.Bi OFFICE SUPPLIES
128847 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $04.06 ICE
128648 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 43.100.60 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91
128849 STEVE P. IlOOS. INC. S163.809.00 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A-2
125850 RED WING SM 0E5 362b.77 SAFETY SHOES
128851 REDI EXPRESS $92.95 MESSENGER SERVICES
128652 THE RE6IS7ER 31.357.2G NOTICES 6 ADS
m 126853 REMUTL METER RLSLTTING SYSI 35.G00.00 POSTAGE
X 128854 COMMUNITY BUSINESS GRAPHICS 6112.3b PRINTING
128655 -- MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY 34.U61.2G PLUMBING SUPPLIES
l'!J 128656 ROBBINS SCIENTIFIC $3.012.05 LAB EQUIPMENT
128857 J R ROBERTS CORP 6135.2TD.38 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1
128858 ROSEMOUNT INC. $949.84 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
128659 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL $1,167.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
128860 ARNOLD S RUMMELSBURG. G.E. $2.183.76 ENGINEERING SERVICES
VT 120861 PEGGY SILCOX 3540.U0 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128862 RUSSELL-S COMET. CO. 2300.00 CONSTRUCTION
120863 JOSEPH T RYERSON G SUN IN $629.46 STEEL
128864 SKC WEST $977.5b SAFETY SUPPLIES
128865 SAFETY YLST 3288.31 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128866 SANOFI DIAGNOSTICS PASTEUR $456.70 LAB SUPPLIES
128867 SANTA FE BAG CO 1242.4b BUILDING SUPPLIES
�- 128868 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $765.03 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
120869 SEA COAST DESIGNS $412.57 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
128870 SNURELUCK SALES 17.026.26 HARDWARE
128871 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION $102.74 LAB SUPPLIES
126872 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO $345.08 LAB SUPPLIES
128B73 SKYPARM WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI 52.923.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
128E 74 SMITH FIRE WALK;
SUPPLY INC 637.0E PLUMBING BUPPLIEB
128875 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $5.597.00 PERMIT FEES
120876 SO CALIF CUASTAL WATER 1c95.558.0U BCCWRP M.O.5-8-91
128877 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 3241.6b0.41 POWER
126078 SO CAL GAS CO 62.376.23 NATURAL GAS _
4. 128079 $O CALIF WATER CO $36.96 WATER USE - -
128880 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CU 65.170.88 DIESEL/UNLEADED• MEL
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YURKINO CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
. .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
\I •I CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATE 63/24/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
128881 SPAMKLETTS DRINKING WATER 61.871.BG DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
128002 NESTALLOY INC $179.78 STEEL
12SB83 SPEAKER SUPPORT f69.65 PRESENTATION AIDS
128089 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCL SYS 13.G29.16 TRAINING REGISTRATION
128885 STERLING ART 190.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128886 STEVENS PUBLISHING CORP S.99.44 SUBSCRIPTION
128807 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO $88.43 TOOLS
_ 128BB8 TCN ASSOCIATES $1,106:69 LAB SUPPLIES
. ' 128889 TAYLOR-DO AN All ' COMPANY A213 61 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
128890 THOX PEON IN DO S1,IAL SUPPLY $69.48 HARDWARE
128691 TRANSMATION INC $323.03 PUMP PARTS
126892 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $
945.U0 TRAVEL SERVICES
128093 TRAVEL TRAVEL $V81.60 TRAVEL SERVICES
128894 ., TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY INC SIB4.11 TRUCK PARTS
128895 J6 TUCKER B SON INC 1637.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS
128096 TUSTIN DODGE $23.45 TRUCK PARTS
r 128897 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $1.728.06 LAB SERVICES
128898 UNITED INDUSTRIAL TINE $442.91 TRUCK PARTS
X 128899 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $209.81 PARCEL SERVICES
128900 VNR SCIENTIFIC, 95,394.11 LAB SUPPLIES
126901 VALIN CORPORATION i1.591.T1 FILTER
128902 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO S1.178.69 PLUNGING SUPPLIES
128903 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS 461.49 PRINTING
1 1289C9 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $293.58 LAB SUPPLIES
t" A 128905 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 313.650.29 CAUSTIC SODA N.0.8-12-92
1 _ 128906 VESTAVA INTERNATIONAL $68.74 TRUCK PARTS
120907 WHESSDE VAREC S1i6.99 FREIGHT
128908 VILLDAN ASSOCIATLS S21.352.61 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-31
120909 _ ROURKE L WOODRUFF 6 OR 199.629.66 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92
128910 AEROX CORP f9.168.65 COPIER LEASES
128911 GEORGE YARDLEY CU - 5126.95 VALVES
129912 NORMAN E CULVER 1239.45 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128913 RICHARD B EDGAR 1200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
126914 ROBERT M MAIN $116.06 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
-----------------
TOTAL CLAIMS PAIL t3/C4/93 1L.627,461.02
i FUND NO 9199 - JT DIRT WORKING CAPITAL PROCES3ING DATE 03/18/93 PAGE 7
DISTRICTS
REPORT NUMBER A 93
COUNTY SANITATION
/24/93 POSTING DATEE03/29 93
SUMMARY AMOUNT
.� Np1 OPEN FUND {6.70
XI CAP FAC FUND $58,631.00
92 OPER FUND $3,916.94
2 CAP FAC FUND 031r 731.68
3 OPBR FUND 11�197.01
3 CAP FAC FUND 2:193.70
5 OPER FOND 5726.59
65 CAP FAC FUND 13:024.00
6 OPER FUND t29.51
8 7 OPER FOR 6 79.09
7 CAP FAC FUND 6:368.52
pIII OPER FUND 2,325.20
11 814 CAP FAC FUND 8 5,943.50
586 OPEN FUND 3.50
586 CAP FAC FOND 13,163.18 8JT OPER FOND 9 7.467.70
WAY 763,188.02
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS 219.122.16
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 483,025.16
137 $2,627,461.02
X vavaav aea
W
I
V t .�
1
1 '
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
5-12-93
1 ) Presentation of Pride Suggestion Awards
At its last meeting, the Fiscal Policy Committee
approved ten Pride cost-saving or safety
suggestion awards to employees, totaling
$4,856.30.
The ten Pride proposals are estimated to save
approximately $62,035 annually.
Tonight we would like to recognize an employee
who received the maximum $ 1500 for his
suggestion.
I would like to ask his Department Head,
Bob Ooten, to introduce the employee and give a
brief summary of the suggestion.
Dale Sparks: Pride No. 267 - Condensate
U-Tube Drain Traps.
Present certificate and check.
-Item 2 on Next Page-
2) Upcoming Meetings
A. Fiscal Policy Committee - The Fiscal Policy
Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday,
May 19th, at 5:30 p.m.
B. Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Ocean
Monitoring - The Special Joint Works Selection
Committee re Ocean Monitoring is scheduled to
meet on Wednesday, May 26th, at 4:30 p.m.,
(immediately preceding the Executive/Fiscal Policy
Committees meeting).
C. Executive Committee/Fiscal Policy Committee -
The Executive and Fiscal Policy Committees are
scheduled to meet on Wednesday. May 26th, at
5 :30 p.m.
Invite two of the following Directors to attend and
participate in the discussions:
Victor Leipzig and Thomas Lutz
-or-
Eva Miner or Maria Moreno
D. Personnel Committee - The Personnel Committee
is scheduled to meet on Thursday. May 27th. at
5:30 p.m.
E. Engineering and Construction Committee - The
Engineering and Construction Committee is
scheduled to meet on Wednesday. June 2nd. at
5:30 p.m.
wpdoc\gm\jcrpts93\jc05.01
End of Report -
' MEETINODATE May 12, 1993 TIME 7 :30 D.LI. DISTRIDTS 122.3.5.6.7, 11. 13 & 14
DISTRICT I JOINT BOARDS
ILUU) . . . . . . . RICNARDSON .. . ✓ (GEYER) . . . . .. ... BARRERA .....
IBEYER) . . .. . . BARAMA ...... ✓ IDENESI ......... BEIr........
IREADE) . . .. . . FERRYMAN . ... IWCLANAHANI .... CATLIN ......
(FONTIOUSI . . . . SALTARELLI . .. ISCOTII . ........ COLLWS .... _
`J ISTEINERI . . . . . STANTON .. . .. J/ IDENAY) ......... COX ........
ISONEI ....... DEBAY.......
OISTRICT2 (NELSON ........ OUNIAP......
IOULLMSONJ ��WEDAA . . . . . L/ (RICEI .......... iMWi.......
ISCOTT) . . . . LUNS .. . Je IREADEI ......... FERRYMAN ... _
IBEYER .. . ... BARRERA ... ... JG IMAHONEY)....... BIiIN ....... ATE
IDENESI ...... ........ J.10 (BROVMI.. ....... GRPFIN ......
IMaCLANAHAN) . CATLIN . .. .... . IWEDAAI ........ GULLU(SON ...
IFLORAI . . .... MAHONEY . ... . . IWAM ......... HAMMOND ...
IECKENRODEI . . MORENO.MARUL ICOX1 ........... HART........ _
(PARKER) . . . . . NELSON ....... IAGE1 ........... XERSY .......
IDALYI . .. . . . . RCKLEfl ....... (FORSYTHD ...... UZSLO ......
ILUTZ) ... . . .. RILIDO ....... (SILVA) .......... EBIIBIB ......
ISTEINENI ..... STANTON ..... .e IRIOIARDSONI .... LUTZ .. ...... —_
(SINGER( . . . ... ZLAKET ....... _L/ IFLOMI ......... WHONEY ....
ILWNI ........... MWER . ...... _
DISTRICT J IECKENIIOOE) ..... MOIIENO."UL
IMARTINEZI... . SAREN .IyL� IFULIDOI ......... MOLLENO,TED _
WELSONI .. DUNWP............ ! (PARKER) ........ NELSON ......
IMOCLANAHANI . CATLIN . ...... IOUNLAR ........ PARIO:R ...... —
ISCOTT) . . ... COLLINS ...... (DALYI ..... ..... RCXLEII .....
(RICE) . . . . . . . ..BWNS........ (MCIQTI) .... PoNTOUB ....
IMAHONEY) . . . .liGBS ........ ISALTARELLD .... RIGLETT ..... _
IBRO. ...... GRIFFIN ....... �� (LUTZ) ........,. MLWO ....
IAOE) ICERRYLAML . . . ..... ILUTZI .......... SIW ARELLI ..
IFOIISYIHEI LABZlO ....... 9_ (RONTIO 11)......... SANS NE ....
IRICNARDSONI . LUTZ . . . . ..... IDEBAYI ......... SANSONE ..
ILINN) . . . . . . . . MINER ........ �_ (MARTW@1....... SAREN . ...
IDALYI .. . .. . . RCXIER ....... $[ g IROWAILLE) ...... SILVA . .... —
IROBITAILLEI . . . SILVA .. .... allKEn ........ SINGER .... _
IZLAKETI . . SINGER ., �- (STEGER) ........ STANTON
TE —
ISINERI ..... STANTON ... A (STANTON) .......
(RATES) . . . .. SVLVIA ..... :MILLEN ......... SWAN ....... _
(BATES) ......... SYLVIA ...... _
DISTRICT6 IRERRY/SWEAMIU WAHNER .....
IDEBAYI .. . . . . COX IOULLMSONI .. . .. . WEDAA ......
IDEBAYI _.. .. . SAN50NE ..... (NOBITAILLEI ...... WINCHELL .... —
(STANTON) . ... STEINER. ...... (SINGERI . . . . ..... ZLAKET ...... — —
DISTRICT 6 STAFF OTHERS
IE£RRY) . .... WANNER .... SYLVESTER . 1� WOODRUFF.
BROWN.... ANWAR ...
(COX( . . . . .. . . HART......... ANDERSON . DEMIR
ISTANTONI . . . . STEINEq....... CLAWSON.. FLEMWG...
DISTRICT 7 DAWES.... HOHENER ..
(SALTARELLI) .. WAHNEf .....
OOM ZYCA .
IBEYEAFERI ... G AHNEfl .... HODGES .. HUNT .. ..
IBEVENI . ..... BARREN ...... HODGES ... HUNT .....
WARD)NEI .... HAMMO . . . .. .. KYLE ..... KNOPF ..., YZ
WUl.JD ...... HORENO. . . LINGER .... LEE ....
IPULB)OI ...... MOPENO.TEO NICHOL LWDSIROM
ISTANTONI .... STEINER. . . . . . . NIWOLB ... LYNW ....
OOTEN .... SHAW ....
DISTRICT I SIMPSON .. WAGON . , .
IROBITAILLEI ... WL.L....... STNEED ... YOUNG.A.
VINUNT
ISILVA) ....... WINSO . ..
ISTINEfl ..... STANTON
(/.E���S,Y�E/��� �✓
DISTRICT 13 I{/ / j#• /L i &
IRE 1 . . .. . GULLIXBON . .. / _ ♦_ I(�(J.�Aw/P��Ow.�/i )( lfJ�
ISEVENI .... PANDER . ...... l�7Qa{Ap
(DUNIAR . . ... PARKER .......
IDALYI . . . . . STEI ER....... pys�'Yq-
(STANTONI . . .. STEINEq.......
DISTRICT 10 /y
:MILLET( . . . SWAN ...
TT) . .. . PoNTOUS UB .....(BEYER
WARD; .. .. . . BABBEOA ......
WARD; ... HAMMOND .
ISTANTONI . . .. STEINEfl....... V 4/16I93
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
May 12 , 1993 BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION FIRM
Please Print Please Print
S
DISTRICT 2
IS ... WEOM .......SCOTn .. . —_
ISOOTR .. . COLLMB ...... _
IS ERI . . . ... B FMM......
IDENESI . . .... e... ......... _
INEDLANAHAN) . QATLM .......
(FLORA) . . . .. . MAHONEY ..... —_
IEO NRODEI .. MORENO.UAIM _
IPAF¢ RI . .. . . NELSON ....... _ _
IDAM ... . . .. PIOALER.......
ILUTZI . . . . ... v,.T,. .......
ISnNERI ... . . STANTON ..... '
ISWGERI . . .... ZLAKEf .......
COUNTY SjioN DISTRIcfs
OF O E CAONW,
P.0.Box 8127 -
Fountain Valley,California 92728-8127
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS
OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM
�../ TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING.
AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE
SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUTES. y /
DATE: S-' al93 AGENDA ITEM NO. b
NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) DdM,6-Al;
6 A+ D6 69 ok
HOME ADDRESS: /0c2.Fo LJ4//Ar-1'exfI 3
E 9I1r FaZ
(NUMBER/STREET)
�ov ✓rsiu UAGL6y (ia� 9�7��
/� (CIT ZIP CODE)
TELEPHONE: 7 6///3- 00YJY
REPRESENTING: ,4.2Cf'i
fil (SELF OR NAME OF ORGANIZATION
F28A
5/12/93 JOINT BOARD MEETING
#4 - ANNUAL ELECTIONS OF DISTRICT CHAIRMAN AND CHAIRMAN PRO TEM
DISTRICT 1 - Robert Richardson nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded
that nominations be closed. Fred Barrera nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved
and seconded that nominations be closed.
DISTRICT 2 - John Collins and Henry Wedaa nominated for Chairman. Vote was
polled by written ballot, following which it was announced that John Collins had
been elected Chairman. Henry Wedaa nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved
and seconded that nominations be closed.
DISTRICT 3 - Sal Sapien nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nominations be closed. Burnie Dunlap nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved
and seconded that nominations be closed.
DISTRICT 5 - John C. Cox, Jr. nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nominations be closed. Phil Sansone nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and
seconded that nominations be closed.
DISTRICT 6 - James Wahner nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nominations be closed. Evelyn Hart nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and
seconded that nominations be closed.
DISTRICT 7 - Charles Puckett nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nominations be closed. James Wahner nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved
and seconded that nominations be closed.
DISTRICT 11 - Grace Winchell nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nominations be closed. Victor Leipzig nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved
and seconded that nominations be closed.
DISTRICT 13 - John Gullixson nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nominations be closed. Fred Barrera nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved and
seconded that nominations be closed.
DISTRICT 14 - Peer Swan nominated for Chairman. Moved and seconded that
nominations be closed. Leslie Pontious nominated for Chairman pro tem. Moved
and seconded that nominations be closed.
-1-
# 6 - PUBLIC COMMENTS
Domenic A. Defeo, Jr.: I was hired in November 1992 by the Districts as a
mechanic at Plant No. 1. 1 received a two month evaluation that had six line
items. The first one was fair as far as my knowledge of equipment, the rest were
all good. I received a four month evaluation in the middle of my third month and
the top box went from fair to good; all the rest remained fair. I was terminated
the same day.
1 asked for a meeting with Mr. Pigmon and Mr. Jean Taisne. The outcome was
that I was terminated. I asked Mr. Gary Hasenstab to look into it and 1 never got a
reply. I thought that this was my only recourse in coming here and to plead my
case.
I am attending Rancho Santiago College in the ------- and wastewater treatment, ----
----- hydraulics ------ I have thirteen years in the Army Reserves and have been a
professional and I think it is very unprofessional the way this matter was handled.
I was hoping that this could be looked into in a professional manner. Thank you
for your time.
JC: Thank you, Mr. Defeo.
Director M. Moreno: Can we ask questions?
JC: This is an administrative matter. We can't take action but you can ask a
question?
Director M. Moreno: Within the system, is there a union? Is that an option that
you have?
Defeo: No. As a probationary employee, I was told that I couldn't ------- until my
probation was over. As a District employee, I was told I had no rights. -----------
so I had no protection.
Director M. Moreno: That's what I wanted to know. Thank you.
JC: Is there anyone else that wishes to address the Board?
Director Gullixson: In the terms of our procedure, does this type of matter
necessarily come before the Executive Committee in sometimes closed session as
a Personnel Committee or how do we work this?
JC: Are you asking whether this has been before a Board committee?
Director Gullixson: I am wondering if he has the procedure for directing his
grievances to our Executive Committee or is this strictly through our Personnel
Office ---- at his discretion.
-2-
# 6 - PUBLIC COMMENTS
Domenic A. Defeo, Jr.: I was hired in November 1992 by the Districts as a
`J mechanic at Plant No. 1. 1 received a two month evaluation that had six line
items. The first one was fair as far as my knowledge of equipment, the rest were
all good. I received a four month evaluation in the middle of my third month and
the top box went from fair to good; all the rest remained fair. I was terminated
the same day.
1 asked for a meeting with Mr. Pigmon and Mr. Jean Talsne. The outcome was
that I was terminated. I asked Mr. Gary Hasenstab to look into it and I never got a
reply. I thought that this was my only recourse in coming here and to plead my
case.
I am attending Rancho Santiago College in the ------- and wastewater treatment, ----
----- hydraulics ------ I have thirteen years in the Army Reserves and have been a
professional and I think it is very unprofessional the way this matter was handled.
I was hoping that this could be looked into in a professional manner. Thank you
for your time.
JC: Thank you, Mr. Defeo.
Director M. Moreno: Can we ask questions?
JC: This is an administrative matter. We can't take action but you can ask a
question?
Director M. Moreno: Within the system, is there a union? Is that an option that
you have?
Defeo: No. As a probationary employee, 1 was told that I couldn't ------- until my
probation was over. As a District employee, I was told I had no rights. -----------
so I had no protection.
Director M. Moreno: That's what I wanted to know. Thank you.
JC: Is there anyone else that wishes to address the Board?
Director Gullixson: In the terms of our procedure, does this type of matter
necessarily come before the Executive Committee in sometimes closed session as
a Personnel Committee or how do we work this?
JC: Are you asking whether this has been before a Board committee?
Director Gullixson: I am wondering if he has the procedure for directing his
grievances to our Executive Committee or is this strictly through our Personnel
Office ---- at his discretion.
-2-
TLW: Mr. Defeo is a probationary employee as is true in most all public agencies.
Where he says he has no rights that sounds harsh but that is not totally accurate
but substantially accurate. Probationary employees essentially serve --- and the
agency as the employer need not give cause, need not give it with particular
`.. reasons or whatever. The termination procedure is such then that while it is in
review, the alternate decision rests with the General Manager.
Director ?: How long is the probationary period?
TLW: Six months, there is provision for extension but it is essentially six months.
#7a - JOINT CHAIRMAN REPORT
JC: Any further questions? Then we will move on the reports. This evening it is
my pleasure to be able to make a PRIDE presentation. As you know I always like
to have those employees who have submitted suggestions to the District to save a
substantial sum of money to the Districts and are thereby rewarded. The
maximum amount come before the Boards and receive their compensation and
recognition.
At the last Fiscal Policy Committee there were ten PRIDE cost savings or safety
awards by our employees totaling $4,856.00 that we paid in PRIDE awards. The
ten PRIDE proposals are estimated to save approximately $62,035 annually.
Tonight we will recognize an employee that received the maximum $1,500 for his
suggestion. At this time I would like to ask Bob Ooten to come forward to
introduce our PRIDE employee.
....
B0: Thank you, Mr. Chairman and the Boards of Directors. I would like to
introduce to you Dale Sparks, one of our senior operations staff. Dale came up
with an automated means of doing something that we do manually. Cost of about
$5.00 a day. By applying this automated means at the plant, we expect to save
$1,300.00 a year and about $30,000 in staff ------- For that I recommend that
Dale receive the maximum PRIDE award of $1,500.00 and a certificate of ------.
JC: Dale, we appreciate your contribution to the Districts. We want you to know
that it certainly is appreciated and hopefully you will have some more of those for
us. Thank you.
The Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, May 19th, at
5:30 p.m.
The Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Ocean Monitoring is to meet on
Wednesday, May 26th, at 4:30 p.m. (immediately preceding the Executive/Fiscal
Policy Committee's meeting).
The Executive and Fiscal Policy Committees will be meeting on Wednesday,
May 26th at 5:30 p.m. I would like to Invite Eva Miner and Maria Moreno.
-3-
Personnel Committee is scheduled
to meet on Thursday, May 27th, at 5:30 p.m.
The newly-formed Engineering and Construction Committee will meet on
Wednesday, June 2nd, at 5:30 p.m.
#7b - GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
JWS: Just two brief items. In 1981 the Sanitation Districts were one of the
founding members of the Southern California Energy Coalition which is a
consortium of both private and public organizations actually started in Orange
County that are high energy users. The users under this consortium agreed to
shave energy demands during peak periods and in turn Edison pays us a standby
amount so that if they have to call upon us, we can shed load for them so their
system doesn't go down or they go Into rolling brown-outs. Over the 11 or
12 years that we have been in that program we have received $1.2 million and
never had to shed except during practice runs. I am pleased to inform you that for
1992 we just received a check last month for $185,000.
We have struck out in trying to schedule a second new Directors' Orientation and
Treatment Plant Tour. I would like to suggest to those of you that would like a
briefing and a plant tour, if you would give me a call we will arrange to do that at a
convenient time for you.
#12b1 - ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION 1993
SERIES 1. AND THE FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST SWAP (1993 SWAP)
JC: I would like to point out that there are some action things that we want to
approve but there has been a request that the wording in 12(b)(1)(0 in the second
line thereof should say "and General Counsel recommend" and to delete request.
Director Swan- -----------------
JC: After the word White we would insert "or other acceptable counsel" to clear
that up.
Director Stanton: He ask that the record show that he abstains on all of Item #12.
#12b2 - OWNER-CONTROLLED WRAP-UP INSURANCE PROGRAM
Director Parker: Is the wrap-up program self-insured or a conventional?
JWS: It would be conventional insurance.
-4-
#14 - CLOSED SESSION
TLW: We will be going into closed session tonight to again review the status of
the District's position relative to the construction contract and the engine generator
purchase contracts respectively, with Brinderson Corporation (J-19-2) and Cooper
(J-19A). The discussion will point to the preparation for the pending arbitration for
resolution of the disagreements.
#26 - REPLACEMENT OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY GRAVITY SEWER, BETWEEN
THE ARCHES (NEWPORT BOULEVARD) AND DOVER DRIVE, CONTRACT NO.
5-37-4
TMD: Mr. Chairman, this issue is a joint District 5 and 6 issue. It is a
rehabilitation of a sewer in Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) that was built in 1936.
We are ---- with this in a rather fast pace because we are trying to get all this work
done before Caltrans rebuilds PCH behind The Arches and Dover Drive within
Newport Beach.
We have had alot of work in getting this project ready. We did studies on this
sewer and we are now going to show you what we found to see the inside of this
sewer. This is electronically-controlled. (Gave a visual presentation)
That is a separation in joints that you are seeing there. We are going with the
flow. We have it blocked; this is about 3:00 in the morning at low flow. That
spray you see is the cleaning equipment in front of it. Now you will see the cracks
in the sewer. The sewer is ready to fail here. I have about six hours of tape to
show you but this sewer is in very bad shape. This project will do a couple of
things.
We've had an awful lot of meetings down there with the business community.
They are very worried in these hard economic times about the impact this will have
on them. The people that live adjacent to the business community especially on
the hills are concerned. They are concerned about noise. The reason that I
mention that is there is alot of thought of whether we should work days or work
nights. Working nights has less impact on the business and traffic but people
can't sleep. We have had alot of meetings with the Mariners Mile Association and
at the City Hall where we had public meetings to build consensus and we've done
that. We have a general sign-off from the people that are the most concerned.
About half the project we're going to work around the clock on it to get it done
beginning September 13, the first Monday after school starts. We are going to
insert a liner in this pipe and we will use the old pipe as a carrier but it will be a
structural liner on the inside.
-5-
The other half of the project has to be a bigger pipe so we can't do that. We will
do that only in the daytime. That happens to be between the Pelican Wall and
Dover Drive. We are guaranteeing that we will keep access open to each business
at all times and we have come up with the plan that we can do the work so that
we won't close down any business.
We are asking that you approve these plans and specifications with bonus and
penalty clauses to ensure that our contractor will meet the deadlines and the
schedules that we have told the people down there we will meet. All the work will
be done by Christmas but it does provide that if it is not, the contractor has to
stop during the Christmas season and not interrupt the business community during
that season and come back after January.
Caltrans is going to begin their work during February so we will be done by
February 1st with all this work. If you approve the specifications now we will
advertise this project and bring it back for award at the July Board. This will allow
for the successful contractor to order the necessary pipe so that the actual
construction can begin September 13. It is a very detailed schedule of work. The
estimated cost for the whole project is $1.8 million.
Director Debay: Were you able to get rid of the backup bells on the trucks at
night?
TMD: We could not so what we have put in the specifications is that in the area
that we are going to rehab all the kits, and the excavations will be done daylight
only and rehab will be done at night when we have an advantage of lower flows.
We have to do the rehab in a live sewer so there won't be alot of noisy equipment
at night.
Director Sansone: I move the actions with the changes that Tom and I discussed
earlier on laterals.
Director ?: One question on the liners. What is the life expectancy of that?
TMD: We would expect that liner to have a 40 or 50 years life expectancy.
#31 - CRYSTAL COVE PUMP STATION. CONTRACT NO. 5-36
TMD: This project is the construction of a new pump station to serve the Newport
Beach down coast, an area just south the city. The pump station will be built
adjacent to and across the highway from Crystal Cove.
We've received bids from this project a couple of weeks ago and we had bids that
ranged from just under $1.0 million to approximately $1.3 million. The low bid and
the second low bid were separated by less than $4,000 on a $1.0 million estimate.
Our original estimate was $1.4 million but we've been receiving very low bids so
we lowered the engineers estimate prior to bidding to $1.0 million so we were
L� within $7,000 of the bid.
-6-
The other half of the project has to be a bigger pipe so we can't do that. We will
do that only in the daytime. That happens to be between the Pelican Wall and
Dover Drive. We are guaranteeing that we will keep access open to each business
y at all times and we have come up with the plan that we can do the work so that
we won't close down any business.
We are asking that you approve these plans and specifications with bonus and
penalty clauses to ensure that our contractor will meet the deadlines and the
schedules that we have told the people down there we will meet. All the work will
be done by Christmas but it does provide that if it is not, the contractor has to
stop during the Christmas season and not interrupt the business community during
that season and come back after January.
Caltrans is going to begin their work during February so we will be done by
February 1 at with all this work. If you approve the specifications now we will
advertise this project and bring it back for award at the July Board. This will allow
for the successful contractor to order the necessary pipe so that the actual
construction can begin September 13. It is a very detailed schedule of work. The
estimated cost for the whole project is $1.8 million.
Director Debay: Were you able to get rid of the backup bells on the trucks at
night?
TMD: We could not so what we have put in the specifications is that in the area
that we are going to rehab all the kits, and the excavations will be done daylight
``..� only and rehab will be done at night when we have an advantage of lower flows.
We have to do the rehab in a live sewer so there won't be alot of noisy equipment
at night.
Director Sansone: I move the actions with the changes that Tom and I discussed
earlier on laterals.
Director ?: One question on the liners. What is the life expectancy of that?
TMD: We would expect that liner to have a 40 or 50 years life expectancy.
#31 - CRYSTAL COVE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-36
TMD: This project is the construction of a new pump station to serve the Newport
Beach down coast, an area just south the city. The pump station will be built
adjacent to and across the highway from Crystal Cove.
We've received bids from this project a couple of weeks ago and we had bids that
ranged from just under $1 .0 million to approximately $1.3 million. The low bid and
the second low bid were separated by less than $4,000 on a $1 .0 million estimate.
Our original estimate was $1.4 million but we've been receiving very low bids so
we lowered the engineers estimate prior to bidding to $1 .0 million so we were
y within $7,000 of the bid.
-6-
We are pleased with these results. It is a very good bidding result and we
recommend tonight that you approve two addendums that we issued that clarify
the project, make minor technical changes and award the bid to the low bidder,
Schuler Engineering Corporation.
#34 - SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES FOR PARK STANTON PLACE SENIOR
CITIZEN APARTMENTS IN THE CITY OF STANTON
JC: I will entertain discussion.
Director Sapien: I submitted this request ---------- and City of Stanton's general
plan. There was considerable discussion at the Fiscal Policy and Executive
Committee and decided not to pursue ------ --------------- with the senior citizen
population growing and for affordable housing.
Director Dunlap: The problem I have with this proposal is that it changes the fee
schedule that has been developed. If it is fair in every case is not the issue here.
My concern is taking it out of context. What it does is basically disrupts the entire
equity position of our fee schedule. -------- each of our cities have an obligation for
housing whether it be for seniors or another part of our population. We are moving
as aggressively as we can and trying to solve without taking one piece of a total
fee structure, disturbing the equity position of all the other players. I just oppose
to support this from being out of context. We would have to ----- the entire fee
schedule for every District, for every single hookup. I don't think it is the right -----
Director Catlin: I would have to echo Director Dunlap. I have some concern on
�./ this because we are all in the redevelopment. I would have to agree with the
staff's position on our ----- It would be inequitable in doing this. It would disrupt
our financing -------- I just don't think we should open this up.
Director Kerry: I don't know exactly what the situation is ------- set aside that they
are suppose to be using to help our low cost ------- There may be some way of
going through them. There may be another total approach to get that funding.
This is an appropriate fee; it's just a question as to who pays now.
Director Collins: I think we are all sensitive especially since it's a political force.
We are very sensitive to senior housing and affordable housing. We all have
mandates that we have to live by. I am really concerned with messing with a fee
structure that makes decisions on the fly.
Tape ended.
-7-
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 61 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
MAY 129 1993
PN{TATfoN
. 9 `oyolilan o GIs
J2 o uoo• T�,
s:-
S/oc. 19Se
AgNCH COON'
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Noe. 1, 2,3, 5, B,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on May 12, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., in the
Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation the roll was
called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2,3. 5,5, 7, 11, 13 and 14
as follows: -
ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
\..Iy DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: Robert Richardson, Chairman Thomas E. Lutz
Fred Barrere,Chairman pro tom Gem Beyer
James M.Ferryman Nate Reade
• Thomas R. Safeties Leslie Pomious
• Roger Stanton Wiliam G. Steiner
v DISTRICT NO.2: _>L Jahn Collins, Chairman George Scott
Henry W. Wedaa, Chairmen pro tem John M.Gullixsan
Fred Batters Gen Bayer
_ Bob Ben _� Berry Dena
Buck Catlin MWIy McCbnhan
Wiliam D. Mahoney James H.Flora
Maria Moreno Norman Z.Eckermde
3_ Carrey J.Nelsen Glen Parker
* Iry Pickier Tom Daly
* Miguel Pu ido Thomas E.LuT,
1_ Roger Stanton William G. Steiner
George L.Zlaket Sheldon Singer
DISTRICT NO.3: Sol A. Sorption, Chairman Don Martin:
Burnie Dunlop. Chairmen pro tam Carrey J. Nelson
Bock Catlin Molry Mcclanhen
Jahn Collin George Scott
_ James V.Evans Margie L. Rice
James H.Flora William D. Mahone
a_ Don R.Griffin Arthur Brown
Gail Kerry Cecilia L.Age
x Frank Laszlo Gwen A.Forsythe
Thomas E. LWz Roben Richardson
Eva G.Miner Wally Linn
In,Pickier _ Tom Daly
x Jim Silva Earle Robitaille
_L Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket
.E— Raper Stanton William G. Stain,
_1L Charles Sylvia Ronald Bates
DISTRICT NO.5: Z John C.Cox, Jr., Chairman Jan Debay
Phil Someone, Chairman pro ter Jan Debay
William G.Steiner Roger Stamen
DISTRICT NO. 6: _E_ James A.Warner, Chairman Anhur Perry
. Evelyn Han.Chairman We tem John C. Cox. Jr.
Wiliam G. Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: _� Charles E. Puckett.Chairman Thomas R.SaltarelF
y_ James A.Warner, Chairman pro lem Mika Schaefer
Fred Barrere Gene Beyer
Jan Debay Phil Sansone
Barry Hammond Mike Ward
• Ted Moreno Miguel Pulido
• Wiliam G. Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 11: Grace Winchell, Chairman Eerie Robitaille
_ Victor Leipzig, Chairman pro tern x Jim Silva
Roger Stanton Wlliem G.Steiner
DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M.Gullixson, Chairman Henry W.Wades
Fred Barrere, Chairman pro tam Gen Beyer
x Glenn Parker Burnie Dunlap
c g_ Iry Pickle, Tom Daly
x William G. Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Fear A. Swan,Chairman Darryl Miller
"J x _ Leslie Pontious, Chairman pro ter Charles E. Puckett
3_ Fred Barrere Gene Beyer
Barry Hammond Mike Ward
is William G. Stainr Roger Stanton
—2—
05/12/93
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes,
Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board
Secretary, Corinne Clawson, Patti Gorczyca,
Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, John Linder,
Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, Kim Patton,
Mary Simpson, Dale Sparks, Chuck Winsor, '.
Ray Young, Paula Zellor
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Carolyn Bruskin, Jamil Demir, Domenic A.
Defeo, Jr., Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Phil Stone
DISTRICT 1 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and
Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of
Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared
nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tern of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1.
It was then moved: That Director Robert Richardson be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled
and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Richardson as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Fred Barrera be nominated as a candidate for
the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was �..✓
polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Barrera as
Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 2 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and
Chairman oro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of
Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared
nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2.
It was then moved: That Directors Henry W. Wedaa and John Collins be
nominated as candidates for the office of Chairman. The vote was then polled by
written ballot, following which the Assistant Secretary announced that Director
Collins had been elected Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Henry W. Wedaa be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote
was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Barrera as Chairman pro tem.
-3-
05/12/93
DISTRICT 3 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and
Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of
Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared
`.� nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3.
1 It was then moved: That Director Sal Sapien be nominated as a candidate for the
office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and the
Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sapien as Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Burnie Dunlap be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote
was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director
Dunlap as Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 5 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and
Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of
Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared
nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5.
It was then moved: That Director John C. Cox, Jr. be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled
and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Cox as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Phil Sansone be nominated as a candidate for
the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Sansone
as Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 6 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and
Chairman Pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of
Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared
nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6.
It was then moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled
and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Cox as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Evelyn Hart be nominated as a candidate for
the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Hart as
`.� Chairman pro tem.
-4-
05/12/93
DISTRICT 7 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and
Chairman Pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of
Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared J
nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7.
It was then moved: That Director Charles E. Puckett be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled ,
and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Puckett as
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director James A. Wahner be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations,
the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for
Director Wahner as Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 11 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and
Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of
Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared
nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 .
It was then moved: That Director Grace H. Winchell be nominated as a candidate
for the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled
and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Winchell as �..✓
Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Victor Leipzig be nominated as a candidate for
the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Leipzig as
Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 13 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and
Chairman Pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of
Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared
nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13.
It was then moved: That Director John Gullixson be nominated as a candidate for
the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and
the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Gullixson as
Chairman.
-5-
05/12/93
It was further moved: That Director Fred Barrera be nominated as a candidate for
the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations, the vote was
polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Barrera as
Chairman pro tem.
DISTRICT 14 This being the annual meeting at which
Annual election of Chairman and elections are to be held for Chairman and
Chairman pro tem of the Board Chairman pro tem of each of the Boards of
Directors, the Assistant Secretary declared
nominations in order for the offices of Chairman and Chairman pro tem of the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14.
It was then moved: That Director Peer A. Swan be nominated as a candidate for
the office of Chairman. There being no other nominations, the vote was polled and
the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for Director Swan as Chairman.
It was further moved: That Director Leslie A. Pontious be nominated as a
candidate for the office of Chairman pro tem. There being no other nominations,
the vote was polled and the Assistant Secretary cast the unanimous ballot for
Director Pontious as Chairman pro tem.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized Domenic A.
Recognition of persons who wish to Defeo, Jr., a former employee of the
be heard on matters of general Districts, who addressed the Boards
interest regarding his recent termination from
employment with the Districts during his
probationary period and requested a review.
In response to Directors' questions regarding the policies and procedures for
grievances for terminated probationary employees, the Joint Chairman and General
Counsel explained that this was an administrative matter handled through the
Personnel Office and no action could be taken at this time.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman briefly reviewed the
Presentation of PRIDE Awards to Districts' PRIDE program which rewards
employees employees for creative suggestions with an
economic or safety benefit to the Districts.
He reported that at its last meeting, the Fiscal Policy Committee approved ten
PRIDE cost-saving or safety suggestion awards to employees totaling $4,856.00.
Chairman Mahoney then asked Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations, to
come forward and assist in the presentation of the maximum award amount of
$1.500.00 to employee Dale Sparks. Mr. Ooten reported that Dale Sparks'
suggestion, resulting in automation of a task that was previously done manually, is
estimated to save the Districts approximately $30,000.00.
The Joint Chairman commended the employee for his PRIDE suggestion and
presented Mr. Sparks with his $1,500.00 cash award and certificate of
u appreciation.
-6-
05/12/93
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the
Report of the Joint Chairman tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as
follows:
Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, May 19th, at 5:30 p.m.
Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Ocean Monitoring - Wednesday, May
26th, at 4:30 p.m., immediately preceeding the Executive/Fiscal Policy
Committees' meeting
Executive/Fiscal Policy Committees - Wednesday, May 26th, at 5:30 p.m.
(Directors Eva Miner and Maria Moreno were also invited to attend.)
Personnel Committee - Thursday, May 27th, at 5:30 p.m.
Engineering and Construction Committee - Wednesday, June 2nd at 5:30 p.m.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that in 1981
Report of the General Manager the Districts were one of the founding
members of the Southern California Energy
Coalition, which is a consortium of both private and public organizations, started in
Orange County, that are high-energy users. The users in this consortium agreed
with the Southern California Edison (SCE) to reduce energy demands during peak
periods. SCE then pays the members a standby amount so that if they have to call
upon them they can shed energy load so Edison's system doesn't go down or into
rolling brown-outs. Since this program has been implemented the Districts have `..✓
received $1.2 million and never had to shed except during practice runs. Mr.
Sylvester then reported that for 1992 the Districts received a check for
$185,000.00.
The General Manager then stated that staff had been unsuccessful trying to
schedule a second new Directors' Orientation and Treatment Plant tour. He
suggested that those Directors that would like a briefing and plant tour contact him
and arrangements would be made on an individual basis.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered that
said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-7-
05/12/93
\� DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
April 14, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-8-
05/12/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District
claims set forth on pages "A" and "B"
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and �..�
are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
04/07/93 04/21/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 956,513.63 $630,705.82
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,087,962.84 529,701 .49
Joint Working Capital Fund - 131 ,944.79 123,995.89
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 8,033.69 30,169.91
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 427.97 52.51
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 26,457.32 79,681 .69
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 18,672.11 22,146.81
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 256,915.82 20,767.24
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 292.61 48.49
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 41,914.99 20,910.08
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 461 .19 924.10
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 95.61 .00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 39,938.96 333.83
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 28,365.75 53.64
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,285.88 .00
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 9,650.54 302.61
53.609.933.70 $1.459,794.11 �✓
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Purchase of Five Flatbed
Trucks. Specification No. A-168. to That the bid tabulation and recommendation
Los Angeles Freightliner/GMC re award of Purchase of Five Flatbed Trucks,
Specification No. A-168, be, and is hereby,
received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Los Angeles
Freightliner/GMC for a total amount not to exceed $115,530.80 plus sales tax.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Microcomputer Hardware.
Software and Associated Peripherals, That the bid tabulation and recommendation
Specification No. E-229. to GST. Inc. re award of purchase order contract for
Microcomputer Hardware, Software and
Associated Peripherals, Specification No. E-229, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded
to GST, Inc. for nine systems, for a total amount not to exceed $31,557.25 plus
sales tax.
-9-
05/12/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizina staff to issue a Purchase
order to bioMerieux Vitek. Inc. for That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to
Purchase of bioMerieux Vitek Jr. issue a purchase order to bioMerieux Vitek,
Bacteria Identification System Inc. in the amount of $37,130.00, plus
(Specification No. E-230) sales tax and freight, for Purchase of
bioMerieux Vitek Jr. Bacteria Identification
System, (Specification No. E-230).
Approving Change Order No. 21 to Moved, seconded and duly carried:
the plans and specifications for Job
No. J-19-1 That Change Order No. 21 to the plans and
specifications for Central Power Generation
System at Plant No. 1 , Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $192,366.00 to
the contract with Hunter Corporation for three items of additional work or other
contract adjustments, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving plans and specifications for
Job No. P1-38-2 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Resolution No. 93-45, approving plans and
specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to
Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38-2, and authorizing the General Manager to
establish May 18, 1993 as the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
�..' ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Addendum No. 3 to the
Professional Services Agreement with That the Selection Committee certification
John Carollo Engineers for design, of the final negotiated fee relative to
construction support services and Addendum No. 3 to the Professional
preparation of operation and Services Agreement with John Carollo
maintenance manuals for Job Engineers for design, construction support
Nos. P7-38 and P2-43 services and preparation of operation and
maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous
Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous
Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional
engineering services for seismic work as provided in the agreement and to
incorporate additional changes in the scope of work, be, and is hereby, received,
ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 93-46, approving Addendum No. 3 to said agreement with John Carollo
Engineers for said additional services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus
overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for an
additional amount not to exceed $527,600.00, increasing the total authorized
compensation from an amount not to exceed $1,991,565.00 to an amount not to
exceed $2,519,165.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
�..' part of these minutes.
-10-
05/12193
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approvina Addendum No. 3 to the
Professional Services Agreement with That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Dames & Moore. Inc.. a Delaware Resolution No. 93-47, approving Addendum
Corporation for Job Nos. P1-38-3 and No. 3 to the Professional Services
P2-43-2 Agreement with Dames & Moore, Inc., a
Delaware Corporation, to conduct Seismic
Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-38-3, and Seismic Study Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to
Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-2, providing for a reallocation of the costs
among categories within said agreement with no change in the maximum
authorized compensation of $840,620.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting That the Selection Committee certification
Engineers for Job Nos. P1-40-2 and of the final negotiated fee relative to the
P2-47-2 Professional Services Agreement with Lee &
Ro Consulting Engineers for Facility
Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-2, and Facility
Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 93-48, approving said agreement with Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers for said
services, on an hourly-basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed
$549,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is
Professional Services Agreement hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum
with Brown and Caldwell Consulting_ No. 2 to the Professional Services
Engineers for planning. design and Agreement with Brown and Caldwell
construction services for Job Consulting Engineers for planning, design
Nos. J-11-1. J-26. J-27. P2-23-5-1. and construction services in connection with
P2-35-2. P2-35-3. P2-35-4 and master-planned support facilities at Plants 1
P2-35-5 and 2 (includes Job Nos. J-11-1, J-26,
J-27, P2-23-5-1, P2-35-2, P2-35-3, P2-35-4
and P2-35-5) providing for changes to the original scope of work.
_11_
05/12/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to solicit proposals and negotiate an That the Selection Committee be, and is
`r..� agreement for Environmental and hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and
Geotechnical Services. Specification negotiate an agreement for Environmental
No. 5-070 and Geotechnical Services, Specification
No. 5-070, for various collection system and
treatment plant projects to be constructed over the next three years.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive. file and approve written
reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy
and Executive Committee Committee's meeting and Executive Policy
Committee's meeting held on April 21, 1993
and April 28, 1993, respectively, be and are hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be
made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Advance Refunding
Certificates of Participation 1993
Series 1, and the Fixed-to-Floating
Interest Rate SWAP (1993 SWAP)
Approving Orrick. Herrington
and Sutcliffe to serve as
special bond counsel
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That selection of Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe to serve as special bond
counsel on the Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993
Series 1, and the Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP, (1993 SWAP), be,
and is hereby, approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby request a fee
proposal for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
-12-
05/12/93
Aporovina Rourke. Woodruff
& Spradlin to serve as
co-counsel
Moved, seconded and duly carried: _
That selection of Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin to serve as co-counsel on the
Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1993 Series 1, and the
Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate SWAP, (1993 SWAP), be, and is hereby,
approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby request a fee
proposal for consideration by the Boards at a future meeting.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Directina staff and General
Counsel to recommend that -
Merrill Lynch utilize Brown and
Wood or Jones. Hall. Hill or
other acceptable counsel to
serve as underwriter's counsel
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized and directed
to recommend that Merrill Lynch, Districts' underwriter, utilize either the firm
of Brown and Wood or the firm of Jones, Hall, Hill and White, or other
acceptable counsel, to serve as underwriter's counsel on the Advance
Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
-13-
05/12/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up
Insurance Program
�./ Authorizina staff and General
Counsel to take steps
necessary to seek approval by
the State Legislature of an
Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up
Insurance Program
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized to take steps
necessary to seek approval by the State Legislature of an Owner-Controlled
Wrap-Up Insurance Program for Districts' construction projects.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Authorizing staff and Robert F.
Driver Associates. Districts'
insurance consultant/broker. to
report back with further
information on an
Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up
�..J Insurance Program
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff and Robert F. Driver Associates, Districts' insurance
consultant/broker, be, and are hereby, authorized and directed to report back
with further information on an Owner-Controlled Wrap-Up Insurance Program
for Districts' construction projects, a draft of such a plan and an
implementation schedule.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Declaring the 1993-94 Sewer Use
Fees and Connection Fees will not That the Boards of Directors do hereby
increase from rates established for declare that the 1993-94 Sewer Use Fees
the 1992-93 fiscal year and Connection Fees will not increase from
rates established for the 1992-93 fiscal year
and will continue to be in effect for 1993-94, provided the Governor and State
Legislature do not confiscate Districts' property taxes, as follows:
-14-
05/12/93
ANNUAL SEWER USE FEES - 1993-94
District Single-Family Multi-Family Non-Residential
No. Residential Residential Properties
1 S 83.24 $49.94/Unit $59.52/1,000 SF
2 71 .52 42.91/Unit 51 .14/1,000 SF
3 73.89 44.33/Unit 52.83/1,000 SF
5 96.75 58.05/Unit 69.18/1,000 SF
6 76.47 45.88/Unit 54.68/1,000 SF
7 50.09 30.05/Unit 35.81/1,000 SF
11 60.00 36.00/Unit 42.90/1,000 SF
13 100.00 60.00/Unit 71,50/1,000 SF
14 NONE - District No. 14 is fully funded by IRWD
CAPITAL FACILITIES CONNECTION FEES - 1993-94
DISTRICTS NO. 1. 2. 3. 5. 6, 7. 11 & 13
RESIDENTIAL $2,350/DWELLING UNIT �,.✓
NON-RESIDENTIAL $470/1,000 SQUARE FEET,
$2,350 MINIMUM
DISTRICT NO. 14
NONE - District No. 14 if fully funded by IRWD
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff and General Counsel
to draft an amendment to the That staff and General Counsel be, and are
Districts' Ordinance Establishing hereby, authorized and directed to draft an
Source Control Fees. Administrative amendment to the Districts' Ordinance
Fees. Non-Comoliance Sampling Fees Establishing Source Control Fees,
and Miscellaneous Charges Administrative Fees, Non-Compliance
Sampling Fees and Miscellaneous Charges
for introduction and first reading at the regular June meeting of the Boards of
Directors, to adjust or establish said fees in the amounts determined necessary to
recover the Districts' costs.
-15-
05/12/93
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be
made a matter of record.
DISTRICTS 1 .2.5.6.7.11 .13&14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Directing that no further study be
given re modifying sewer connection That the Boards of Directors do hereby
fees direct that no further study be given to the
issue of modifying sewer connection fees
and that no change be made to the existing policy that does not allow fee
adjustments.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be
made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Amending Classification and
Compensation Resolution No. 79-20. That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
as amended establishing a 1993 Resolution No. 93-49, amending
Summer Work Program Classification and Compensation Resolution
No. 79-20, as amended, establishing a
1993 Summer Work Program for painting, grounds maintenance and pump station
maintenance work. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of
these minutes.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be
made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Urging Equitable Allocation of
Property Taxes and State Support of That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
School Funding in California Resolution No. 93-50, Urging Equitable
Allocation of Property Taxes and State
Support of School Funding in California before consideration of further Property
Tax Shifts. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be
made a matter of record.
-16-
05/12/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Districts' Two-Way Radio
System/County-Wide 800 MHz Radio
System
Authorizing staff to continue to
monitor the orogress and
development of the proposed
new County-Wide 800 MHz
Radio System
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to continue to monitor
the progress and development of the proposed new County-Wide 800 MHz
Radio System and, upon receipt of additional information, assess the
advisability of the Districts' participation in the system and report back to
the Boards; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That staff in the interim continue to maintain the
Districts' existing 453 MHz Two-Way Radio system in a state of readiness
and repair to meet the Districts' day-to-day and emergency radio
communications needs.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to Motorola
Communications and
Electronics. Inc. for Purchase of
Two-Way Radio Equipment
(Specification No. E-227)
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to
Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. in the amount of
$38,383.00 plus sales tax, for Purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment
(Specification No. E-227).
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
-17-
05/12/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve the written
report of the Conservation. Recycle That the written report of the Conservation,
4� and Reuse Committee Recycle and Reuse Committee's meeting
held on April 27, 1993, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors of
General Counsel's Comments Prior to the need for a closed session as authorized
Closed Session by Government Code Section 54956.9 to
review:
1) Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and
general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to the co-generation
internal combustion engines.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Convene in closed session pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at
8:07 p.m. pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s)
of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code
Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of
Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings.
ALL DISTRICTS At 8:28 p.m. the Boards reconvened in
Reconvene in regular session regular session.
DISTRICTS 1 & 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 1 to the
plans and specifications for Contract That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and
No. 2-30 specifications for Memory Lane Interceptor,
Contract No. 2-30, authorizing a net
addition of $78,273.22 to the contract with Mladen Buntich Construction
Company for five items of additional or modified work, be, and is hereby,
approved.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993.
_7 g_
05/12/93
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving an exchange of ownership
Agreement with the City of Placentia That the Board of Directors hereby adopts
Resolution No. 93-51-2, approving an `..�
exchange of ownership Agreement between the City of Placentia and County
Sanitation District No. 2, providing for transfer of ownership of the Palm Avenue
Purchase to the City of Placentia. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes. -
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993.
DISTRICT 7
Actions relative to Abandonment of
Red Hill Pump Station. Phase 1.
Contract No. 7-14-1-1
Approving Change Order No. 1
to the plans and specifications
for Contract No. 7-14-1-1
Moved, seconded and duly carried: �✓
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Abandonment
of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1, granting a time
extension of 33 calendar days to the contract with Silveri & LeBouef for
completion of said work due to inclement weather, be, and is hereby,
approved.
Accepting Contract
No. 7-14-1-1 as complete
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-55-7,
accepting Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract
No. 7-14-1-1 as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion
and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-19-
05/12/93
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Grant of Easement to Crow
Winthrop Development for 10' That the Board of Directors hereby adopts
right-of-way re Contract No. 7-11-2 Resolution No. 93-56-7, approving and
authorizing execution of Grant of Easement
to Crow Winthrop Development for 10' right-of-way required to install a new
sewer line over the northeasterly corner of District's Michelson Pump Station site,
Contract No. 7-11-2 in exchange for a Quitclaim of abandoned sewer line in a 10'
easement located on said site from Crow Winthrop Development. Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file Summons and
Complaint for Order Relieving That the Summons and Complaint for Order
Petitioner from provisions of Relieving Petitioner from provisions of
Government Code, Section 945.4. Government Code, Section 945.4, Loyd T.
Loyd T. Nitzen II vs. Orange County Nitzen, II vs. Orange County Sanitation
Sanitation District, Case No. 708855 District, Case No. 708855, relative to an
application for leave to file late claim that
was denied by the District in connection with a vehicle accident in the vicinity
where routine sewer maintenance was being performed in the City of Tustin by
District's crews, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Districts' General Counsel be, and is hereby,
authorized to appear and defend the interests of the District.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Amendment No. 1 to Lease
Agreement with General Telephone That the Board of Directors hereby adopts
Company re Slater Avenue Pump Resolution No. 93-57-11, approving
Station Amendment No. 1 to Lease Agreement with
General Telephone Company re Slater
Avenue Pump Station, authorizing an extension of lease agreement for an
additional three years at the current rate of $1 ,900.00 per year. Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993.
-20-
05/12/93
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m., May 12, 1993.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Accepting Improvements to Bayside
Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3. Contract That the Board of Directors hereby adopts
No. 5-$4-3. as complete Resolution No. 93-53-5, accepting
Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk
Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, as complete, authorizing execution of a
Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICTS 5 & 6
Actions re Replacement of Pacific
Coast Highway Gravity Sewer.
between The Arches (Newport
Boulevard) and Dover Drive. Contract
No, 5-37-4
Verbal staff report
The Director of Engineering reported that the 1989 Master Plan had found
that the existing sewer in Pacific Coast Highway was hydraulically
inadequate to meet long-term flow projections. The sewer, built in 1936, is
also failing and its replacement and/or rehabilitation for structural reasons is
more urgent now than for future hydraulic needs. CALTRANS is planning to
reconstruct and resurface Coast Highway between Newport Boulevard and
Dover Drive in Newport Beach between February and June 1994.
Therefore, this project has been accelerated in order to be completed prior to
the start of the CALTRANS work. The Director of Engineering then narrated
a brief video depicting the inside of the failing sewer.
Mr. Dawes stated that plans and specifications are now complete for this
project, the reach between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover
Drive. The CALTRANS work is being coordinated with the Districts'
project, the needs of the adjacent business and residential communities, and
with the needs identified by the City of Newport Beach. The sewer line _
work between Newport Boulevard and Dover Drive is scheduled to begin -
construction in September 1993 with completion by January 1994.
-21-
05/12/93
He further stated that there have been several public meetings between the
Districts' engineering staff and the Mariners' Mile Business Association, as
well as the adjacent business and residential communities. As a result, a
portion of the sewer replacement will include rehabilitation by either the
y insituform method or by insertion of a high density polyethylene pipe into
the existing pipe (approximately 3,200 feet of 24-inch pipe) to minimize
construction impacts on the community. Mr. Dawes explained alternatives
considered and several of the measures being taken to mitigate impacts on
the business and residential communities. The balance of the project will
involve replacement of approximately 3,100 feet of 30-inch pipe and
reconstruction of all manholes.
Mr. Dawes also stated that as part of Contract No. 5-37-4, the Districts will
identify utilities that will have a critical bearing on the selected alignment for
future Contract No. 5-37-3, between the Arches and Bitter Point Pump
Station, tentatively scheduled for fall 1994. The specifications provide for a
bonus of $500 per day for early job completion plus a $1,000 per day bonus
for early completion of the rehabilitation work. Late completion will result in
identical liquidated damage assessments. The engineer's estimate for this
project is $1 .8 million.
He then reported that westerly of the Arches, Pacific Coast Highway has
already been reconstructed by CALTRANS. Alignment studies are still being
conducted by the Districts' consultant to determine the optimal alignment
for this reach to minimize disruptions to a newly reconstructed Pacific Coast
Highway. This reach will involve full replacement with larger carrier pipes to
`./ meet future hydraulic capacity requirements. The design of this reach will
be completed by year-end with construction starting after Contract
No. 5-37-4 is completed.
Approving plans and
specifications for Contract
No. 5-37-4
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-52, approving
plans and specifications for Replacement of Pacific Coast Highway Gravity
Sewer, between The Arches (Newport Boulevard) and Dover Drive, Contract
No. 5-37-4, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for
receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part
of these minutes.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 8:35 p.m., May 12, 1993.
-22-
05/12/93
DISTRICT 5
Actions re Crystal Cove Pump Station. �..✓
Contract No, 5-36
Verbal staff Report
The Director of Engineering reported that in March, the Directors approved
the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-36, the new Crystal Cove
Pump Station, which will serve the down coast developing areas adjacent to
Crystal Cove. This pump station is an essential element within the new
South Coast Trunk Sewer System, Phase 2, which was recently awarded to
Mike Prlich & Sons under Contract No. 5-35-2. The Crystal Cove Pump
Station will receive flow from the upstream gravity sewer system and
discharge flow into the new double-barrel force main system being built
under Contract No. 5-35-2.
Mr. Dawes stated that on April 13, 1993, 13 bids were received for this
project. The bids ranged from a high of $1,331,633.00 to a low of
$993,442.00, submitted by Schuler Engineering Corporation and
recommended that the contract be awarded to the low bidder.
Approving Addendum No. 1 to
the plans and specifications for
Contract No. 5-36 �.✓
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Crystal Cove Pump
Station, Contract No. 5-36, making miscellaneous modifications and
clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Addendum No. 2 to
the plans and specifications for
Contract No. 5-36
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Crystal Cove Pump
Station, Contract No. 5-36, making miscellaneous modifications and
clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
-23-
05/12/93
Awarding Contract No. 5-36
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-54-5, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for
Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, to Schuler Engineering
Corporation, in the total amount of $993,442.00. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 8:38 p.m., May 12, 1993.
DISTRICT 3 At the April 14th meeting, District 3
Consideration of request to reduce Directors received a request to reduce sewer
sewer connection charges for Park connection fees from Jan Development Co.,
Stanton Place Senior Citizen and Chairman Sal Sapien, Stanton City
Apartments in the City of Stanton Councilman, for the Park Stanton Place
Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of
Stanton. After considerable discussion, because sewer connection fees are
administered in accordance with a uniform policy adopted by all Districts and any
modifications could have Districts'-wide implications, the matter was referred to
the Fiscal Policy Committee.
The Joint Chairman recognized District 3 Chairman Sapien who stated that he had
submitted this request that is consistent with the General Plan of the City of
Stanton. He noted that the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee
reviewed the issue at length and have recommended that no further study be given
to the issue of modifying sewer connection fees and that no change be made to
the existing policy that does not allow for any fee adjustments. The other Districts
concurred in that recommendation earlier on the agenda. He also noted that he
believed support for this type of project is important with a growing senior citizen
population and limited availability of affordable housing. Chairman Sapien had
requested that the matter be placed on the May 12, 1993 agenda for separate
consideration by District No. 3 Directors. He also directed staff and the General
Counsel to draft an ordinance for introduction in the event the Directors give
favorable consideration to the request.
-24-
05/12/93
The Board then entered into a discussion of the issue during which several
Directors spoke in support and in opposition to granting a reduction in fees for the
project. At issue was the equitability of adjusting fees for one segment of the
community and its impact on others in the overall fee structure, and on the
relevant programs of both the Districts and the cities as well, notwithstanding the
worthiness of the project. It was also pointed out that any such adjustment could
also impact the other Sanitation Districts and that if it were to be considered, it
should be in the context of providing an overall evaluation of the entire fee _
structure. Although support for projects of this type was expressed, it was the
consensus that reduction of the sewer connection charge was inappropriate at this
time.
It was then moved and seconded that no action be taken on the request for a
reduction of the District 3 sewer connection charges for the Park Stanton Place
project.
Following a roll call vote the Assistant Secretary reported that the motion had
passed by virtue of 10 Directors voting in favor, and 5 Directors against.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried that the matter of reviewing the
Districts' fee structure be referred to the Joint Boards for consideration.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:02 p.m., May 12, 1993.
AW,V1 la
Assistant Se tar f the Boards of Directors
of County Sanitati Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
-25-
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/93 PAGE 1
R EP DRY NUMBER AP43
CLUNTY SAUIIATION OISTRIGTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/07/93 POSTING DATE 04/97/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIP710N _ .
128921 AG TECH CUMPANY 169.328.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.30-9-91
128928 AGA CORPORATION $1.074.90 DRUGS
128929 AM BEST COMPANY $90.00 BOORS
120930 A T L T $3,631.66 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SBRVICBS
128931 AMERICAN TELEPHONE i TELEORAFH $1,214.71 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
128932 A T L T $185.17 LONG DISTANCE TELBPHONS SERVICES
128933 ACLU-LABS RESEARCH INC $50.60 LAS SERVICES
128934 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP 43V.398.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES. M.O.11-I8-92.
128935 AIR ACCESSORIES CO f55.96 FILTER
120936 AIM COLD SUPPLY INC $160.86 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS -
128937 AIR PRODUCTS L CHEMICAL . IN $603.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES-_
128938 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT f27.19 ASPHALT - _ - - -
128939 AMEN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLB $452.40 PUBLICATION
12094C AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLECTN -. . . ._. 6436.71, LAB SUPPLIES_.
128942 AMICON. INC f$97.86 LAB SUPPLIES
120943 ANAHEIM INC 643.00 LAB SUPPLIES
128944 ANANEIX SEWER CONSTRUCTION .. _ _ A23 r643.00. BANBR REPAIR 0I8T Sib
128919 ANDa UC0 3615.T1 --� �� LAB SUPPLIES--- -- �---- -- _ - � �--- -- - -�
fTi CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT
X 12894E BLAME P SI CONTROL
230.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
= 12894E ANTHONY FESI CONTROL _ .. $472.96 .. . ......_._.. _ .__._ ._.. .__.
128948 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $364.70 NOTICES i AS
12894E APPLIED BI03TST EMS INC i364.T0 LAB SUPPLIERS
128950 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING i2.$85.31 __ _ PAYROLL 88RVIC88 ____
128951 BFI PORTABLE SERVICES 393.64 PORTABLE REMOVAL - - -
n /28951 BkK LANDFILL i3.393.64 RSSIDUAL$BATTERIES REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91
1--� 128952 BATTERY SPECIALTIES .. _ 4526.5L. BATTERIES
128953 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC $4.339.83 - LAD SUPPLISB-'
128954 ROBERT bEIN WILLIAM FROST •2.442.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-33
128955 BELL SECURITY _. _...9915.00_._. __. TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES
128956 GT BILLARD INC f616.97 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
128957 SIOMENIEUV VITEK INC $40.629.16 LAB EQUIPMENT
126958 010 TECH NET. INC _ -_iR7.51_ SERVICE AGREEMENT
128959 bON-A-RUES $305.81 .. TRUCE-PARTS
12096C BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $49,101.18 SNGINIRRING BERVICSS 7-7-1
128961 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC .. _ _ __5418.20_ .. ELECTRIC PARTS
128962 BROWN A CALDVELL CONSULTING $2.336.43 _-ENGINEERING-BERVICBS7 PI-=37-__.
128963 BUDGET JANITORIAL $1,650.00 JANITORIAL BUPPLI68
12P964 BUREAU OP BUSINESS PRACTICE _..._ 155.92. _ ,._. TRAINING VIDEO
1296 BURME EN 6INEERING CO . . W1GVE8"
129966 CANT G STR EEC i2r 904 904.8383 PETTY UBLI GIN REIMBURSEMENT
128967 CRC PRESS INC _ _487045 _ ._ VALUE
ATION
PARTS
12P968 CS COMPANY i149.20 � -�-VALVE-PARTS- -�---"--- ----_-- --
128969 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE f701.16 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128970 CAL.S CAMERAS AND VIDEO _ - f104.49_ _ CAMERA REPAIRS
128971 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $29,237.71 - ENGINEERING SERVICE9'P1-38;'P1-34--'"'-"__-""-'
128972 CENTURY PAINT $215.31 PAINT BUPPLI68
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST VURBIN6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3131193 PALE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANbL COUNTY . .
CLAIMS PAID C4/07/93 POSTING DATE U4/47/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
126973 CENTURY SAFETY INST A SUIP f14.b6O.69 SAFETY SUPPLIES
120974 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING 96.818.25 STORAGE UNIT
128975 COLICH AMU SONS 11.774.936.40 CONSTRUCTION I-9
126976 COLLEGE PLACEMENT COUNCIL f237.05 SUBSCRIPTION
128977 COMPRESSOR - COMPONENTS OF CA 92.605.00 FITTINGS
128978 COMPUSA. INC. 305.3E COMPUTER SUPPLIES
128979 CONNELL ON PARTS / DIY $16.37 TRUCK PARTS
12898C CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL UIST $6.735.27 ELECTRIC PARTS
128981 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $1.200.52 TOOLS
128962 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $1.616.25 CHLORINE M.0.30-9-91
128983 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC 31.06b.0u INSTRUMENT PARTS
128984 COSTAR CORP $198.26 LAB SUPPLIES
128985 STATE BOARD OF EQUILIZATION $255.47 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEES
126986 DAPPER TIRE $516.51 TIRES
GLASS _ . .. .. _. ._.
128988 DC GUELLE L SUNS GLASS CO S167.88 LAB SUPPLIES
I28989 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS f1B9.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS
128990 DELTRON INC i169.84
ITT 12B990 OE2UPIK AND/OR CS CD $6.904.25 ANIONIC
M
VALVES
= 126991 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $3,867.75 ANIONIC POLYMER N.O.8-12-92
T--T 128992 OIFILIFPO ASSOCIATES /1.293.u4 PRINTING
UJ 128993 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 31.154.30 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
128994 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $3.393.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
128995 DUNN EDN ARDS COMP i318.43 PAINT SUPPLIES
12899E DIVALS SALES 5132.9E
." _ . . FITTINGS _ _...._ _._._...
U 128999 EIM CO/MIS SUPPLY $2.226.39 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
N ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-44
12899E EMA SERVICES INC - i2$192.11 _
128999 E S S i192.i1 LAB BDPPLIBE -"
129000 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING $715.10 SAFETY SUPPLIES
129001 EASTMAN INC 36.732.08._._ .. OFFICE SUPPLIES
229002 ELECTRO-TEST INC 1915.04 -ELECTRICAL 88RVIC88
129003 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES $3,542.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
129004 ENCHANTER INC 53A920.00._. _ WERE MONITORING M.0.6-30-92
129005 JOSEFH EVANS 52.500.00 - DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
129006 CHARLES EVANS A ASSOC. $59,201.00 CONSULTING 88RVIC88 - LAB
129007 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S3.900.60_ RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
_ _. .. ..__.
12900E FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 1716.75 AIR"FRBIGHT__.PROPANE
129 FERNEELGPS i68.10
129CIOC10 FISCP EP A PORTER CO 19.513.14 CHLORINATION PARTS
._. LAB SUPPLIES'"
129012 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $
$73.54 LAB SUPPLIES
129013 FISONS INSTRUMENTS f73.51 CONCRETE CUTTING
129C13 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. ,129.04_. ..__. —CONCRETE
PARTS
129C14 FLU-SYSTEMS f3.129.0E
129C15 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 461.03 FILM
129017 THE FOKBURO CO $2,404.96 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
'- '" OFPICB-80PPLI88 - __.._.. _..._ ._.. ._ ...._. _. ..
129C17 GET. INC. i2.1U4.96 LUMBER/NAROWARE
129F18 44 Np XL LUMBER CO $B 65.22
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST UURKI46 CAPITAL PKOCESSIN6 DATE 3131193 PA&L 3
A LPORT NUMBER AP93
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNT;
CLAIMS PAID 04/07/93 POSTING DATE 04/O7/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMUUNT DESCRIPTION
129019 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY 66.U17.78 CMBMICALB '
129620 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUIPLY CO. A1.291.9i INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
129021 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $170.24 TELEPHONE SERVICES '-
129022 BIERLICH-MITCHELL INC S1.5bT.52 PUMP PARTS
129023 N GLANTZ A SON 1585.75 BUILDING MATERIALS
129G29 DON GREEK A ASSOCIATLS 11.755.00 SUPPORTING SERVICES H.0.6-30-92 '
129025 NB TYPE A GRAPHICS 11.292.79 PRINTING
129026 HACH COMPANY $325.22 LAB SUPPLIES
129027 PL PAWN CO INC $207.03 FILTERS - '
129028 HELLO $252.70 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT
129C29 MUERGIGLR CVS CALIF I $211.31 COMPRESSOR PARTS
129030 RC HOFFMAN MISR ISC0 690.95 LAB SUPPLIES
129031 RS HUGHES CO INC 176..OL PAINT SUPPLIES
129032 HUNTIN6TON BEACH RUbbLR SIR $1.163.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES
229033 MUHTIN6TON VALLEY SCMWINN L $77.49 BICYCLE PARTS "
129034 IBC 66.i9b.63 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES
T+T 129035 IMPERIAL LEST CHEMICAL ieSN23.29 ,. FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O. 11-18-92
X 129G36 INDUSTRIAL THREADCO PRUDUCTS 31•♦73.23 CONNECTORS
2 129C37 ISI INFORTEKT $25.00 FREIGHT
129038 INGRAM PAPER $3,801.A2 OFFICE SUPPLIES
UO NCIIOPICNE RRADBR LEASE - .. .. _.. ..
129039 JLAGREAT
CREDIT N S a1R5.132 6
1290AP GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPF 1931.1E JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
129011 JAV'S SUSPENSION
i)9B.03 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE
n 129062 JOH•S SUSPENSION SERVICE A33.CO TRUCE IC SUPPLIES
-- - - -
� 129 N] JON.USTONE SUPPLY R20.31 ELECTRIC BVPPLI68
W 1290A9 JON ES DHENIDALE INC 52.035.63 CXEMICAW
129065 KETTENDURG MARINE $71.08
_ LAB SUPPLIES.._
129066 KING WEARING INC 6"9.51 NAMES BUPPLI68
229047 KNOK INDUSTRIAL SUPPLILS 52,773.18 SAFETY SUPPLIES
129098 MARTIN KOROICK SN 13.298.25 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
129049 TNL LAST WORD 1855.00 COMPUTER SERVICES
129050 LATHAN. JONES A LYE. LAWYERS $733.50 LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER IND.
129C51 LEGI-TECH $320.00 PUBLICATION -
129052 LEE A NO CONSULTING LNGR $18,687.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-30-5
129053 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 48.562.71 'TRIP FIELD SAMPLING PROGRAM
129054 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL 4933.33 - OC6AM MONITOI1INfi -
129055 NOT BIOLOGIC CONPANV $255.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
129056 NEC ANALYTICAL 5YSTENS INC. 11.818.62 LAB SERVICES
129057 MPS $223.74 PROM IURPHIC SERVICES - --' '
129058 NSA 146.93 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129059 MAINTENANCL PRODUCTS INC $2.323.53 MECHANICAL PARTS
129060 HARVAC ELECTRONICS 192.87 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES — -- - " - — "' -
129061 MATT - CHLOR INC $034.54 CHLORINATION PARTS
129062 MCGANRY CLNTRAL TYPLURITLM 1 6496.7L OFFICE EQUIPMENT
129063 MEMOREX 6357.71 LAB BUPPLI68
12906E HICROAGE OF CLNRITOS 1985.47 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/93 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION 61STAILTS Of UNAN6E COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID C4/67/93 POSTING DATE 44/67/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129065 MIDWAY MFG E MACHINING S23.229.20 MECHANICAL PARTS
129066 MINNLSOTA WESTLRN Y15UAL TRES. S.7.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES
129067 MISSION INDUSTRIES P6.222.6G UNIFORM SERVICE
1.9068 MLAOEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $16.746.97 CONSTRUCTION 2-30
129069 MONTGOMERY WATSON 812.923.53 RNGIN88RING SERVICES
129070 MOORE S TABER $24,750.00 BACKFILLING SERVICES
129071 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC $166.96 HARDWARE
129072 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION AS 5173.26 BOOKS _
129073 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDL A $82.00 SUBSCRIPTION
129074 THE OMMART CORP $934.85 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129075 OR SYSTEMS CO "S.913.0. CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91
129076 OMEGA ENGINEERING. INC $1,261.78 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129077 ON-LINE ELECTRONICS S2D7.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
129078 ORACLE CORPORATION 41.00.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
129079 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $119.24 TRUCK PARTS
129080 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO S1.534.83 CHEMICALS
129081 ORANGE COURIER S133.50 COURIER SERVICE8 _
m 129082 ORANGE VALVE L PITTING CO. $1.875.50 FITTINGS
S 129083 OSCAR-S LOCK A SAFE $117.62 SECURITY BBRVICBS
-+ 129084 OXYGEN SERVICE 52.560.1c. SPRCIALTY CRASHES
129085 COUNTY OF ORANGE S5.760.00 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES
12908E COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT SB.C33.69 WORKERS COMP DISTRIBUTION
129087 PC SYSTEMS DES16N _ .. _ 8995.65 COMPUTER HARDWARE
a 129088 PSSI $2.284.55 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
129089 PACIFIC PARTS 32,768.54 INSTRUMENTATION
r 129090 PACFC SAFETY EQUIPMENT. CO ._ S101.96 _ SAFETY SUPPLIES
129091 PACIFIC SEWER NAINTENANCL C $2.714.00 SEWER REPAIRS
129092 PACIFIC BELL $651.93 TELEPHONE SERVICES
129093 FACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS " . 0.734.00 .__ TBLBPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
129094 PROBE JANITORIAL SUPP $235.86 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
129095 PALMIERI. TYLEM. 61LNER. 6866.60 LEGAL BBRVICBS 24-1-IA
129096 PARAGON CABLL .. . 336.70 CABLE SERVICES
129097 PARTS UNLIMITED 5112.7E TRUCK PARTS
129098 ROBERT PETERS $296.42 GARNISIMBNT OVERPAYMENT
129099 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $162.168.13 _ RESIDUALS RBNYVAL M.0.5-8-91
POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE
129101 PITNEY BOWES CREDIT COMP $190.51 SERVICE AGREEMENT
129102 POLYME7fl ICIN INC. 15,172.45
129103 POLYPURC INC $1S.172.49 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
129103 HAROLNTI TION PRODUCTS 2596.00
"' OFFICE"SUPPLIES
129144 MROCES PRIMROSE ICL 564.18 ICE
129166 PROCESS NAL LQUIPMLNT COMPANY .099.14 _ PUMP BKRR
ARTS
12916E PROFESSIONAL AI SERVICE IRO. 52.099.14 GROUNDBKBBPING-SUPPLIES
1291LT THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 94.464.16 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
129108 WUESTRON CORP 85.432.50 LAS SUPPLIES _
129109 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES INC S29.687.76 COMPUTER SERVICES M.O.8-12-92- —" - ' "'- ---"`
129110 R N CONTROLS S151.91 INSTRUMENT PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/93 PAGE 5
A EPYNT NUMUER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OP ORANGE COUNT' _.. ..
CLAIMS PAID U1/67/93 POSTING DATE 04/07/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129111 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO S109.91 LAB SUPPLIES
129112 RED VALVE CO INC f555.11 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129113 REDI EXPRESS 369.3U MESSENGER SERVICES _
129114 REISH MARINE STUDIES. INC f566.W. OCEAN MONITORING
129115 MCJUNKIN-REFUBLIC SUPPLY f3.123.01 PLUMBING SUPPLIER _
129116 ROUINSON FENTILIZLH CO 51.331.79 CHEMICALS
129117 ROSEMUUNT ANALYTICAL 6919.1A INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
129110 SAFETY-MLLEN CORA 62.82S.50 PARTS CLEANER
129119 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 3533.b0 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
129120 SANTA BANK 32.956.00 CONSTRUCTION RETSNTION 2-30 -
129121 DOUG SARVIS $375.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
129122 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L $36,701.53 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92
129123 C 0 WINANT PH U $1.300.00 OCEAN MONITORING
229124 SLA-BIND ELECTRONICS INC $1,713.40 LAD SUPPLIES
129126 SENTEA SYSTEMS INC $10.600.05
.. INSTRUMENT - _. ... .. . . _ ...
12912E SMASTA ELECTRIC 3$6,966.30 R TRIC SERVICES
>< 129128 SILVERS I SALES _ f6$102.30. _ _ AB HARDWARE
X 129120 SILVERS INSTRUMENTATION - 3102.71 LAB BUPPLI68'-
s 129129 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO S972.11 LAB SUPPLIES
'-' 129330 SILVERI A LE BOUEf 1733.50
CONSTRUCTION7-14-1-1
.. 12913 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLi s190. PRE-ENT NT PHYSICAL SKEWS'
--I 129132 SLIDE MASTER f13l.12 12 PRESENTATION AIDE
229177 SMITH-ENTRY CO ;1 S630.00___.__ _PEIMI TESTING
n - - _ PERMIT PBES__.__. ...—
129131 SO COAST AIR TRAINING
i630.00
1jU 129135 SCAYMD UPDATE TRA tN INC i691.67 TRAINING REGISTRATION
129136 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO . .. i/03.107.60_ __ POWER
129137 SO CAL GAS CO -- _ - s10.508.03 _ NATURAL -_ " _.. ... ._. . __.__.. . . .. .__._ .._.
129138 THL TRANS COMPANY 4700.&0 TRAINING REGISTRATION
129139 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO 59.200.17.. DIESEL FUEL
129110 STARLING INSTRUMENT CO INC s250.00 METER
L29111 STAMEN 2 Si ASSDUC PC $3.228.00 INSTRUMENT
96RVICBS
129112 SPECIALIZED T I PRODUCTS CO $1.380.85_ INSTRUMENT
129113 SPEC TECH INC f932.19 �� MELDING SUPPLIES
129111 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS s525.00 LAB EGUIPMBNT INSTALLATION
129145 SUMMIT STEEL 11,700,26. HETAL
12911E SUNSET FOND $19.21
. TRUCE PARTS.._....___._.._
129117 SUPELCO INC $177.9595 LAB BUPPLI68
129118 SUPER POWER PRODUCTS f155.16 JANITORIAL BUPPLI68
ENGRAVING
129119 T8T NAMEPLATE s ENG RAYING CO 3117.65 ENGIN66RING-9ERVICEH
129150 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMPANY $2,229.62 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
129152 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $335.52. MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
129152 TONT•S LOCK 3 SAFE SERVICE $154.79 SECURITY SERVICES - - - "- ''"- -- ---
129153 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO $3.124.4. CONTRACT GROUNDSKESPING M.O.I1-13-91
129154 TRANSERA CORP/NTH INTERNATION. 9575.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
12915 TRA 'ION INC 977.55
.. INSTRUMENT PARTS. .. _ . .. . .. .... . __. __ .
129156 TRAVEL
EL E%LCUTIYCS 31.195.1E TRAVEL 86RVIC68
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/31/93 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CUUNIV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF DRAMbL COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 44/67/93 POSTING DATE 09'/01/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT UESCRIPTION
129157 TRUCK f AUTU SUPPLY INC S1.G60.O6 TRUCK PARTS
129158 JG TUCKER G SON INC 34.498.51 INSTRUMENT PARTS _
129159 TUSTIN DODGE $253.18 TRUCK PARTS
129160 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $3,360.64 LAB SERVICES
129161 TYLAN GENERAL 52.592.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES
129162 UHLER, INC 5252034.22 CONSTRUCTION 5-32, 5-33
129163 THE UNISOURCE CORE 5399.bO OFFICE SUPPLIES
129164 UNITED PARCEL SLKVILL t522.63 PARCEL SERVICES
129165 UNITED TAPE CORPORATION 363.9E SAFETY VIDEO RENTALS
129166 VWR SCIENTIFIC 51.359.29 LAB SUPPLIES
129167 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO - i159.20 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
129160 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $410.53 LAB SUPPLIER
129169 VERVE-S PLUMBING fi.045.00 PLUMBING SERVICES
129170 WATER ENVIRONMENT FED. S16T.61 PUBLICATION
129171 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $23,442.58 CAUSTIC SODA N.O.E-12-92
129172 ROURKE 6 WOODRUFF f OR 613.494.00 LEGAL BERVICBS M.O.2-19-92
129173 XEROX CORP 32 ABS.80 COPIER LARGER
f71 LAB SUPPLIES. ._.
129174 GEORGE VANDLLY CO t996.69
S 129175 GEORGE YARDLEY CO 3267.77 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
'—' 119176 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS f254.U5 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
fA OFFICE SUPPLIES
129I1TS RICHGRO YOUNG Yp00 573.79 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
12978 2ENOGRAPHICS f36.27
a
1 -----------------
10T AL CLAIMS i1iU 41/47/93 f3.649.933.7O
SUMMARY AMOUNT -
11 OPER FUND $427.97
12 OPER FUND $2,900.21
02 CAP PAC FUND $23,557.11
13 OPER FUND 617,875.5E
13 CAP FAC FUND $796.55
/S OPSR FUND $1.194.00
15 CAP FAC FUND $255,721.62
46 OPBR FUND $292.61
17 OPRR FUND $31,242.06
17 CAP PAC FUND 610;772.99 - - - "' --- - -- - - -- -
OIL OPEN FOND $461.19
113 OPEN FUND $95.61
114 CAP FAC FUND 639,938.9E -' - - - - - - --
15G6 OPSR FUND $4,149.92
1586 GP FAC FUND $24,216.23
1667 OPER FUND $2,205.88 -
07R16 OPER FUND 69,650.5E
JT OPEN FUND $956,513.63
CORF 62,087,962.8E -' - -' -- - — -----� -
BELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $8,033.69
JT DIST MORNING CAPITAL FUND $231,944.79
------------- . ._ . _. _ _... .. . ...
`,609,933.70
I !`
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/15/93 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 09/21/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129197 AS TECH COMPANY 928.961.79 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.30-8-91
12919E A T L T $4,913.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
129199 ADVANCE SCALE CO $136.00 SCALE REPAIRS
229200 AGGREK0. INC 321.181.72 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT
129201 AIR PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL IN $52,296.00 O&M AGREEMENT OZY. GEN. SYST H.0.8-9-89
129202 ANAHEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION 35,868.00 SEWER REPAIRS DIET 7
129203 ANIKTER - DISTRIBUTION $106.48 ERE SUPPLIES
129204 ANODYNE INC 53.000.OV ECSA DEPOSIT REFUND
129205 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $753.78 NOTICE 6 ADS
129206 ARATER SERVICES INC 31.589.89 UNIFORM RENTALS
129207 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 31032.30 INSTRUMENT PARTS
229208 ARMOR - VAC 5596.00 STREET SWEEPING
129209 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP 5397.73 ELECTRIC PARTS
129210 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC 5300.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE HAULING _
129211 ART WORKS 5177.60 FRAMING SERVICES
129212 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. 5130.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
129213 ASSOCIATED DIESEL $606.15 FILTER
X 129214 BAR LANDFILL 33.977.2E RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
= 129215 BMF CORP. FIRE PROTECTION CO 3300.00 PIPE REPAIRS
129216 BRW SAFETY A SUPPLY $1.932.76 SAFETY SUPPLIES
00 129217 BAKERS SQUARE IS22 3300.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
129210 BANANA BLUEPRINT $17,992.66 PRINTING
129219 BANK OF THE WEST $2.937.49 CONSTRUCTION RSTBNTI0N J-23-2
w 129220 B BATEMAN 37G2.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
129221 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 3551.88 BATTERIES
129222 BAUER COMPRESSOR 391.57 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS _
129223 BAKTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 97.497.77 LAB SUPPLIES - -
129224 BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS $898.00 SERVICE AGRESMENTB
129225 BELL SECURITY SLIOL4.15 ._ TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES
129226 BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. 919.46 - LAB SUPPLIER - --
129227 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 3590.20 RADIATOR REPAIRS
129226 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP 55.655.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
129229 BRINDERSOM CORP $16,210.05 - CONSTRUCTION - PIPE SPOOLS
129230 BUDGET JANITORIAL 21,650.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
129231 GARY 6 STREED $R.173.81 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
129232 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY S92T.66 - OFFICE SUPPLIES ' - - -
129233 CEPA S1.lOB.86 LAB SUPPLIES
129236 C.G.I. SYSTEMS 11,208.95 RELAY REPAIR
129235 C M 1 3323.69 - - ELECTRICAL REPAIRS _ - -
129236 CPC PRESS INC 9388.27 LAS SUPPLIES
129237 IS COMPANY $517.45 GAUGE
12923E CALTROL INC $5,723.78 INSTRUMENTS --
129239 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC 5677.03 TRUCK REPAIRS
129250 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE 385.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
129241 CALIF. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS 3399.39 FITTINGS
129242 CAREER TRACK SEMINARS S79.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15193 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 64/21/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129243 JOHN CAROLED ENGINEERS t8.473.60 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38
129244 CENTURY SAFETY INST t SUPP 33.832.20 SAFETY SUPPLIES
129245 CHROME CRANKSHAFT INC $370.00 MACNINE SUPPLIES
129246 CHURCH ENGINEERING INC $8.456.17 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-R1
129247 CITY OFFICE FURNITURE INC 3412.54 OFFICE FURNITURE _
129295 CLEVELAND COTTON PROD $134.16 LAB SUPPLIES
129249 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT $72.57 SERVICE AGREEMENT
129250 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO 31D4.89 LAB SUPPLIES
129251 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $5.333.63 HARDWARE
129252 COMPUTER GRAPHICS GROUP 36.675.11 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
129253 COMPUSA. INC. $3.813.26 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
129254 COMPUSERVE 924.20 COMPUTER SERVICES
129255 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIV t17.12 TRUCK PARTS
129256 CON-WAY WESTERN EXPRESS $67.41 FREIGHT
129257 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 31.448.25 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
129258 CONSUL IDATED FREIGHTYAYS 91.727.70 FREIGHT
129259 CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS CO $282.46. LAB SUPPLIES
Fn 129260 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 31.390.8E TOOLS
Z 129261 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C t6.7E5.00 SOILS REPORT
129262 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $E22.E6 TRUCK PARTS
CG 129263 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 3188.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
12926E CYBE REX 523.83 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129265 UNIVERSITY UNION :215.50 TRAINING REGISTRATION
LT1 129266 DAILY PILOT 9515.00 NOTICES 6 JUDE
129267 DAMES L MOORE 13.651.27 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-3
N 129268 J.Y. D•ANGELO CO INC S2.507.31 PPIPE PARTS
BUPPLI66
129269 DATA VIZ INC 950.00 LAB
129270 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
229271 DE GUELLE 3 SONS GLASS CO •9E1.53 GLASS
129272 DELPHIN COMPUTER SUPPLY 3iE0.9E OFFICE SUPPLIES
-
129273 DENVILLE SCIENTIFIC INC $101.97 LAB SUPPLIES
12927E DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO $1,022.67 VALVE
129275 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 35,788.61 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.9-12-92
129276 DIFILIPPU ASSOCIATES $E.059.12 PRIMTING
129277 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP i23.677.63 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
229278 DISCO PRINT COMPANY 1905.00 INSTRUMENT
129279 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN 4742.50 TOXIC WASTE REMOVAL
129280 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC 37.6E5.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
129281 ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC $5.E00.00 INSURANCE CONSULTANT
129282 DUNN EDWARDS CORP $E91.13 PAINT SUPPLIES
129283 D•VALS SALES 6231.08 FITTINGS
12928E EIMCO PROCESS EQUIP CO $1,874.85 MECHANICAL PARTS
129285 ESP NORTH $85.03 ELECTRIC PARTS
229286 EAGLE DISTRIBUTING $375.08 SAFETY SUPPLIES
22926T EASTMAN INC $9.106.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES
129288 ECOANALYSIS INC $45.E80@80 COMPLIANCE DATABASE SYST M.0.1-13-93
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129289 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES $3.703.06 ELECPRICAL SERVICES
129290 EMERGENCY LIFELINE INC 35,326.00 EMERGENCY SUPPLIES
129291 ENCHANTER INC 94.486.00 OCRAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92
129292 ENGINEERED COMFORT SYSTEMS $1.067.80 ELECTRIC PART
129293 ENTECH LAB AUTOMATION S9.845.55 LAB SUPPLIES
129294 ELT $1,386.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129295 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC 1582.00 LAB SAMPLES
129296 ERSHIGS INC 3286.08 FITTINGS _
129297 ESSENCE GROUP 3375.27 COMPUTER PARTS
12929E EXCHANGER WORKS DIV. $1.817.13 MECHANICAL PARTS
129299 MARSHALL FAIRRES $128.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
129300 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5,960.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.30-9-91
129301 CHEMWEST INC 52.317.78 EQUIPMENT
129302 FILTER SUPPLY CO 51.163.37 FILTERS
129303 FIRE MASTER 53.297.27 SAFETY SUPPLIES
129304 FIRST COMPANY 5256.45 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
m 129305 FISCHER S PORTER CO $5,273.56 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
X 129306 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 3925.62 LAB SUPPLIES
S 129307 FLUID HANOLING SYSTEMS $1.074.21 PUMP
1" 129308 CLIFFORD A FORKERY $2,956.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92
129309 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $6,329.40 WATER USE
--1 229310 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $739.60 PAINT SUPPLIES
129311 FREDSON RV SUPPLY $77.48 TRUCK PARTS
i 129312 FREEDOM IMAGING $576.46 LAB EQUIPMENT
W 129313 8U0 FRET 942.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
129314 CITY OF FULLERTON $39.00 WATER USE
129315 GET. INC. $107.21 - OFFICE SUPPLIES "
229316 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO $580.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
129317 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $5.004.92 TELEPHONE BERVICES
129316 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC S29.2119.01 MECHANICAL"PARTS
129319 GLOBAL ENGINEERING $136.82 LAB SUPPLIER
129320 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS SL29.3J CANERA
129321 GREAT AMERICAN FRINTING $10,022.63 PRINTING
129322 DON GREEK L ASSOCIATES $520.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92
129323 HBO TECHNOLOGY 3114.562.00 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2, P2-44
129324 MAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 3143.97 TRUCK PARTS
129325 MACH COMPANY $206.15 TEST KIT
129326 FRED A HARPER 41.500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
129327 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTI 51.578.38 FILTER PARTS '
129328 NAULAWAY CONTAINERS 91.620.00 CONTAINER RENTALS
129329 HAUSER ENGINEERING $1.071.00 LAD SERVICES
129330 PL HAWN CO INC 93,696.85 FILTERS
129331 HELLO 4191.05 TELEPHONE SUPPLIES
129332 J.M. HEMP L ASSOC 3H0.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
129333 G. PATRICK MERSHELMAN 3333.18 DEFERRED COMP PAY-OFF
129334 HILTI INC S495.65 ELECTRIC PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 9
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 64/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129335 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE $2.882.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES
129336 HOERSIGER CVS CALIF INC 1129.27 COMPRESSOR PARTS
129337 HOKE CONTROLS DIV/HONE♦ INC. 1136.23 VALVE
129338 HORIZON HIGH REACH L EQUIP $439.58 TRUCK PARTS
129339 RS HUGHES CO INC $207.22 HARDWARE
129340 HUNTER CORPORATION $56,074.50 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1
129341 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $16.33 WATER USE
129342 HUNT-S FINAL PHASE 327.035.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
129343 IND MECHANALTSIS 12.146.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129341 ISC 35.616.00 INSTRUMENTATION SERVICES
129345 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $48.999.09 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92
129346 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 51.191.11 CONNECTORS
129347 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. %342.,3 TRUCK PARTS
129340 PACTEL TELETRAC 34.208.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
129349 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $145.70 WATER USE
129350 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP $275.48 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
129351 KAMAN BEARINGS 6 SUPPLY f28.99 HARDWARE
129352 KEENAN SUPPLY 9221.68 VALVES
X 129353 KING BEARING INC $87.07 HARDWARE
S 12935, KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $2.074.89 ELECTRIC PARTS
129355 MARTIN KOROICK SR $1.333.30 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
129356 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO $72.30 CELLULAR TELEPHONE 88RV. AGREEMENT
129357 LA TRONICS $80.01 CAMERA
129358 LEE 6 RO CONSULTING ENGR 119.567.07 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38-5
w 129359 LEUPOLD L STEVENS 2284.24 CHARTS
DEFERRED COMP DEPOSIT
J= 129361 LINE OLN NATIONAL LIFE INS. CO. $1,825.00 _
129362 KP LANGELES INC i1$162.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL
129363 LOSMAC NALD-ST TIMES i112.59 SUBLAR SERPTION
VICES
129363 MAINTENAN-STE PRODU LAB $6.900.00 _ LAB ANRVIC89
129365 MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS INC ,6.900.23 MECHANICAL PARTS
129366 MANHOLE ADJUSTING 12$437.65 MANHOLE ADJUSTING
12936E MARINE L VALVE SUPPLY i,37.13 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
12936B MATT - ICHLORNSTRUMENTS
INC A1.$64.75 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
12936E MCBAIN INSTRUMENTS 07.75 LAB SUPPELECTRIC
CE9
129370 MCXINLLY EQUIPMENT CORP $267.73 BLSCTRIC CART PARTS
129371 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO $727.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129372 MICRO MOTION f727.00 IITTINMBNT PARTS
129373 MIDWAY MFG L MACHINING $3.860.00 FITTINGS
129373 MISSION ICSABRASIVE
f]$134.82 IISCELLANT PARTS
129375 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES L13,.82 UNIFORM RENTS SUPPLIES
229376 MISSION INDUSTRIES UME $3$075.00 UNIFORM RENTALS
12937E HITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO ,575.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129378 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION f58.662.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-30
12937E CITY OF ELECTRIC
BEACH 66.53 HATER USE
129380 OFFICIAL
ELECTRIC VEHICLES i67.066JM ELECTRIC CARTS M.0.1-13-93
129380 OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE A ,U2.Op SUBSCRIPTION
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15193 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITA710N DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04,11/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129382 DX SYSTEMS CO $23,336.30 CHLORINE M.0.30-9-91
129362 ON LINE SOLUTIONS _ $430.00 COMPUTER SERVICES
129383 OPAMP TECHNICAL BOOKS $62.64 LAB SUPPLIES
129384 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $241.02 TRUCK PARTS
229385 ORANGE VALVE A FITTING CO. $1,670.32 FITTINGS
129386 ORITEX CORP 31.286.02 MACHINE PARTS
129307 OXYGEN SERVICE $2,458.45 SPECIALTY GASES
129380 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4,310.64 SERVICE AGREEMENT - RADIOS
129389 COUNTY SANITATIDN DISTRICT $23.846.52 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT
129390 PGC SCIENTIFIC$ CORPORATION 3310.95 LAB SUPPLIES
129391 PSS1 $2,121.86 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
129392 PACIFIC PARTS $80.81 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129393 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 31.069.98 SAFETY SUPPLIES
129394 PACIFIC BELL 359.14 TBLEPHONE SERVICES
129395 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $1,462.66 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
129396 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPP $5,934.87 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
129397 PAGENET 3T2.50 PAGER RENTALS
m 129398 PAK WEST 366.96 PACKING BOXES
= 129399 PARAGON CABLE 336.78 CABLE SERVICES
129400 PARTS UNLIMITED $819.55 TRUCK PARTS
129401 ROY PENDERGRAFT $460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
129402 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION 31.241.82 LAS SUPPLIES
129403 PERMA SEAL 3864.52 HARDWARE
W 129404 PEROXIDATION SYSTEMS INC $3.641.42 CHEMICALS
129405 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $156.083.63 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91
EY 229406 PIIN BONE$ $215.3O
129407 POLY FABRICS 3193.95 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE
129408 POLYPURE INC 313.472.95 CATIONIC POLYMER H.0.3-11-92
129409 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO $66.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
129410 PRECISION INDUSTRIES $2.095.95 - INSTRUMENT PARTS
129411 MIKE PURLICH 9 SONS $14,040.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-35-2
129412 PROGRAMMER'S CONNECTION $74.35 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
129413 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CD. $3,968.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
129414 QUESTRON CORP 393.00 LAS SUPPLIES
229425 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES INC $1,187.06 COMPUTER SERVICES
129416 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO $1,569.41 TRASH REMOVAL
129417 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO $1,162.69 LAB SUPPLIES
129410 THE REGISTER 179.95 NOTICES 6 A]13
129419 REISH MARINE STUDIES, INC 51.160.00 OCEAN MONITORING -
129420 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYST $5,000.00 POSTAGE
129421 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $3,586.72 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
229422 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CORP $929.80 LAID SUPPLIES
129423 ROSEMOUNT INC. 32,920.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS
229424 PEGGY WILCOX $5.552.18 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
129425 RUSSELL•S CONST. CO. 3300.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
129426 S.S. MECHANICAL $22,309.20 CONSTRUCTION PI-33-1
I
FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129427 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $479.54 ELECTRIC PARTS
129428 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1.828.52 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
129429 SANTA BANK $6,529.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30
129430 DOUG SARVIS $375.80 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
129431 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L 517.676.95 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92
129432 SCIENTIFIC ELECTRONICS SERV. $1.294.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129433 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES INC $2,047.25 SPECIALTY GASES
129434 SEA-BIRD ELECTRONICS INC $334.00 LAB SUPPLIES
129435 SECURITY SPECIALISTS 3160.00 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
129436 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $2,039.33 TOOL PARTS
129437 SHURELUCK SALES $7,786.40 FITTINGS
129439 SLIDE MASTER $56.03 SLIDES
129439 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP S323.45 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129440 SO COAST AIR QUALITY $1,260.00 PERMIT FEES
129441 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $1.890.00 PERMIT FEES
129442 $O CALIF ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 6120.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
129443 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $17.064.57 POWER
m 129444 SO CAL GAS CO $15.579.24 NATURAL GAS
X 129445 SOUVENIR PHOTO 6672.77 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
129446 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 62,342.41 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
Ip 129447 STAMEN Z SPASSOFF PE 56.720.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-29-2 -
129448 WESTALLOT INC 735.91 ELECTRIC PARTS
129449 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC :597.47 . PLUMBING SUPPLIES .
229450 SPEX INDUSTRIES INC 3326.b2 LAB SUPPLIES
229451 SPYGLASS INC $157.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
m 129452 SRECO FLEXIBLE 41,283.36 HOSE
129453 SUMMIT STEEL 31.055.61 METAL
129454 SUN ELECTRIC CORP $649.90 TRUCK PARTS
129455 SUPELCO INC $1.152.22 LAB SUPPLIES
129456 SYNANTEC CORP 578.86 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
129457 TEKDRAULICS 3674.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES
129458 TEKTRONIX INC $804.89 LAB SUPPLIES
129459 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL $340.35 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129460 CHARLES E THOMAS 5241.46 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
129461 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 3360.91 OIL 6 GREASE
129462 TONT•S LOCK 6 SAFE SERVICE 5347.41 KEYS/LOCKS
129463 TRANSMATION INC 41,281.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129464 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES 6206.00 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-30-92
129465 TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY INC $142.64 TRUCK PARTS
129466 TRUESDAIL LABS 575.00 LAB SERVICES
129461 JG TUCKER A SON INC $314.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129468 TTLAN GENERAL 53.993.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES
129469 US AUTO GLASS CENTLRS $164.57 TRUCK PARTS
129470 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $967.00 LAB SUPPLIES
129471 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 3789.91 PARCEL SERVICES --
129472 US DEPT OF COMMERCE MIT $31.5D PUBLICATION
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 4/15/93 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 04/21/93 POSTING DATE 04/21/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
129473 VWR SCIENTIFIC $7,031.59 LAB SUPPLIES
129474 VAL1N CORPORATION $861.66 REGULATOR PARTS
129475 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $5,022.08 PLUMING SUPPLIES
129476 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL f252.00 MOTOR REPAIRS
129477 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS $827.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES
129478 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 11.628.17 LAD SUPPLIES
129479 VERTEX SYSTEMS 61t G07,50 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
129480 VILLAGE NURSERIES $375.81 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
129481 CARL WARREN 4 CO $300.00 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
129482 WEATHER AND WINO INSTRUMENT 3290.53 SAFETY SUPPLIES
129483 WEST COAST ENVIRONMENTAL $2,371.10 ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
129484 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 520,302.97 CAUSTIC SODA H.G.8-12-92
129485 WESTIN ENGINEERING 5540.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
129486 ROURKE L WOODRUFF 4 SPRAOLIN 361,676.39 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92
129487 XEROX CORP fT.S19.29 COPIER LEASES - -
129488 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $445.31 VALVES
129489 RICHARD 8 EDGAR 3200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
m ----------------- _.
x
x
TOTAL CLAIMS PA10 09/21/93 f1N 59rT94.i1
w SUMMARY AMOUNT
V N1 OPER FUND {52.51
42 OPBR FUND 74,412.05
42 OAP PAC FUND $19,699.77
03 OPER FUND j$2,447.04
M3 CAP FAC FUND $4,125.04
R5 OPER FUND 26,641.34
90
N5 CAP FAC FUND j16,$48.49
R6 OPER FOND 349.24
F7 OPER PVND 12,560.84
87 GP FAC FUND {12$924.10
R11 OPER FUND f924.10 _
R14 OPER FUND $54.89
814 CAP FAC FUND $270.95
R566 OPER FUND $53.64
R7614 OPER FUND $302.61
JT OPER FUND $630,705.82
CORP $529,701.49
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FU $30,269.91
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL $123,995.89
------------------- _.
$1,459,794.11
V STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
j ) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2,
I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting
on /.t 19 f3 was duly posted for public inspection
at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on
19!?3 .0
IN W�ITNE`SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 141f
day of 1993.
Penny K i nt Secretary of
each of the%6oarqx of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 6 14 of
Orange County, California -
�. F27A.1