Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-04-14 ' B,,\lAryory O)e COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ojrY L 9 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX$127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272&8127 \ / 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 April 7, 1993 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY. APRIL 14. 1993 - 7:30 P.M. 108" Eris Avenue Fountain Valley, California u The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. As Stpfrd secretary Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 21st, at 5:30 p.m. CONSERVATION, RECYCLE - Tuesday, April 27th, at 11:30 a.m. 6 REUSE COMMITTEE at SCAQMD offices, Diamond Bar EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 28th, at 5:30 p.m. PERSONNEL COMMITTEE - Thursday, April 29th, at 5:30 p.m. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 11C)OM ELLIS AVEMIE vo.BOX etn fOUMAW VALLEY.OLIEOPMA W71 ,,,.I W-2.11 �A/ JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetinas Executive Committee Meetinas April Apr 14, 1993 Apr 28, 1993 May May 12, 1993 May 26, 1993 June Jun 09, 1993 Jun 23, 1993 July Jul 14, 1993 Jul 28, 1993 August Aug 11, 1993 None Scheduled September Sep 08, 1993 Sep 22, 1993 October Oct 13, 1993 Oct 27, 1993 November Nov 10, 1993 None Scheduled December Dec 08, 1993 None Scheduled January Jan 12, 1994 Jan 26, 1994 February Feb 09, 1994 Feb 23, 1994 March Mar 09, 1994 Mar 23, 1994 April Apr 13, 1994 Apr 27, 1994 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 9272"127 Telephone: (714)962.2411 JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA (SUPPLEMENTAL) APRIL 14, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (18) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda Items: �.s (a) Consideration of items pertaining to Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040 (1) Verbal report of Staff (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated April 8, 1993 (Copy attached) (3) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to issue a purchase order to Sur-Lite Corporation in an amount not to exceed $129,400.00 for Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040 N../ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA April 8, 1993 109m ELLIS AVENUE 00 SOXFOUNTAIN VALLEv,CALIFORNIA 92729-8127 P1A1962-0A11 STAFF REPORT Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants 1 and 2 Specification No. R-040 At both treatment plants, the Districts have installed flares for the burning of excess digester gas in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) operating requirements. This gas, a byproduct of the sewage treatment process, will be the fuel used in our new Central Power Generation project. After Central Power Generation is operational, the flares will only be needed for standby, to burn the gas if Central Power Generation facilities are off line. The flares were installed under several contracts. The most recent, completed in January, included four new flares. They were purchased separately from the manufacturer by the Districts and installed by a construction contractor. `.F.� In total, the Districts operate six flares, three at each plant, all manufactured by Sur-Lite Corporation of Santa Fe Springs, California, which is the only commercial manufacturer approved by SCAQMD to meet the stringent standards of "best available control technology" established for flaring wastewater treatment plant digester gas. The Districts received permits to construct (PTC) from SCAQMD to construct the flare systems. They had been operating successfully in a trial period; however, recent emission testing performed to confirm compliance with SCAQMD requirements have shown that the flares are exceeding the permitted emission level of oxides of nitrogen, an air pollutant that contributes to smog formation. The two flares tested (one at each plant) were inspected by the manufacturer, who discovered that the burners were deformed by high heat. In order to preclude the issuance of a notice of violation by SCAQMD, staff immediately filed for a variance under the SCAQMD "breakdown" rule. The variance was granted for 30 days effective, Monday, March 15. On an emergency basis, staff issued a purchase agreement under its procurement authority for replacement burners from Sur-Lite for two flares (one at each plant), at a cost of approximately $25,000. With the purchase agreement the flare manufacturer (Sur-Lite) also agreed to investigate and define the cause of extreme temperature conditions currently being experienced that apparently damaged the flares, and to make appropriate recommendations for a remedy. _ Sur-Lite has completed their investigation and made substantial modifications to the flare at each plant that had failed the test. Among other ' problems, staff believes that the original design and control mechanisms for the flares may not have been satisfactory. (These were not furnished by Sur-Lite.) The control system for the flares is very complicated, at best, and an inexact, cutting-edge technology. Because our use of the digester gas is highly valuable today, depending upon how many of our existing engines and boilers are operating, the gas flow conditions that the flares and their controllers must face are highly variable. Because of these wide ranging conditions, the Districts had been operating the flares with a higher temperature to ensure that the SCAQMD minimum temperature requirement of 14000 F would not be violated. This may have contributed to burner problems. The high temperatures have now been lowered due to reconfiguration of the flares and changes to the flare operating parameters. Emission tests have been performed on the two modified flares and, as of this writing, the flare at Plant 2 has passed. The Plant 1 flare has yet to pass, possibly because of control problems. Sur-Lite will continue to investigate, define and correct the problem with the Plant 1 flare and conduct a re-test. Sur-Lite recommends that the remaining four flares be inspected and any damaged burners be replaced and the flares modified to match the Plant 2 flare which is now in compliance. These modifications include a new burner configuration with more burners and relocation of temperature-sensing thermocouples. Additionally, Sur-Lite recommends the addition of two more thermocouples at each flare and changes to the control program. Staff believes Sur-Lite is best qualified to make the required inspections and repairs because of their experience in the design of these flares. Actual costs will not be known until the inspections and repairs are complete; however, full burner replacement and necessary control modifications (not a part of the original Sur-Lite purchase order) should not exceed $115,000. Also, staff recommends that Sur-Lite perform monthly inspections, in an additional amount not to exceed $600 per month, to ensure that the flares remain in adequate operating condition to achieve consistent long-term compliance with SCAQMD's operating requirements. This price includes a substantial discount to the Districts as compensation for experiencing the above problems. However, Sur-Lite has not been requested to pay the entire repair and replacement cost because the higher temperatures and other control changes made by the Districts may also have contributed to the flare problems. Staff recommends authorization to issue a purchase order to Sur-Lite Corporation for Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040, in an amount not to exceed $115,000.00 plus $600 per month for monthly inspection for up to a two-year period, for a total amount not to exceed $129,400.00 plus tax. Staff is applying for an extension of the operating variance provided by SCAQMD to allow time to repair the remaining flares. wpdoelenew-04=40893.. •• -2. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.108" Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 u JOINT BOARDS AGENDA REGULAR MEETING APRIL 14, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1 ) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. (6) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel `r� 04/14/93 (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - March 10, 1993 regular District 2 - March 10, 1993 regular District 3 - March 10, 1993 regular District 5 - March 10, 1993 regular District 6 - March 10, 1993 regular District 7 - March 10, 1993 regular District 11 - March 10, 1993 regular District 13 - March 10, 1993 regular District 14 - March 10, 1993 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See pages = " and "B" 03110/93 03l24/93 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - S 677,448.08 $977,467.70 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,421,117.67 765,184.02 Joint Working Capital Fund - 179,797.23 483,815.16 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 1,988.14 219,122.16 DISTRICT NO. 1 - .00 58,477.70 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 332,769.99 35,648.62 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 301,248.87 13,380.71 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 83,994.99 8,750.59 DISTRICT NO. 6 - .00 29.51 DISTRICT NO, 7 - 40,098.12 11,147.61 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 1,149.30 5,275.06 DISTRICT NO. 13 .00 .00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 929.85 45,943.50 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 23,221.93 3,218.68 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,303.10 .00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 7,747.69 .00 - $3.073.814.96 $2.627.461.02 -2- 04/l 4/`,)J (9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 96) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Purchase of One Steam Sterilizer Unit (Autoclave), Specification No. E-226 (Revised), to Amsco Scientific, Division of American Sterilizer Company, for a total amount not to exceed $27,145.00 plus sales tax. See page C (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Hewlett-Packard Company in the amount of $62,000.00, plus tax and freight, for Purchase of Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer System, Specification No. E-228. (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. 1-9, and Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-22-2, authorizing an addition of $83,741 .00 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich and Sons, for three items of additional work, granting a time extension of 14 calendar days for completion of said additional work, and one item pertaining to a contract-authorized sales tax adjustment, and one other contract `.d adjustment. See page D -3- 04/14/93 �..✓ (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 20 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $53,586.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for 12 items of additional work or other contract adjustments. See page E (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design and construction services, preparation of operations and maintenance manuals, and training services re Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, to change the scope of work and to provide for additional design services to investigate new technology for modifications to enhance advanced treatment effectiveness and efficiency and provide operational flexibility and reliability. (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for engineering evaluation and design and construction support services required for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55. (g) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill for design and programming services required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page E (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-37, approving said agreement with CH2M Hill for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $690,148.00. See page _G -4- 1 04/14/93 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (h) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers to prepare plans and specifications and to provide construction support services for Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page H (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-38, approving said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $950,252.00. See page DISTRICTS 1 & 7 (i) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit a proposal and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the preparation of plans and specifications for Gisler-Red Hill Parallel Force Main, from College Avenue Pump Station to Iowa Street, Contract No. 7-23. DISTRICT 3 (j) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies to design Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Mains (First and Second Units), and New Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 3-36R (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page J (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-44-3, approving said agreement with The Keith Companies for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $85,683.00. See page K END OF CONSENT CALENDAR (10) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any .. -5- 04/14/93 111) ALL DISTRICTS Jai Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees' written reports of their meetings on March 17, 1993 and March 24, 1993, respectively (Copies enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (bl Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said Committees: (1) Consideration of claim of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon for additional fees for special Co-Bond Counsel services re Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series (Executive Committee will report its recommendation on the claim in closed session). (2) Consideration of the following actions relative to Investment Management Policy and Reserve Repurchase Agreements: (a) Consideration of motion appointing Merrill Lynch, Districts' underwriter, to serve as the primary dealer for reverse repurchase transactions (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-40, Designating a Districts' Treasurer and Authorizing the Districts' Treasurer and the Orange County Tax-Collector-Treasurer to Invest and/or Reinvest Districts' Funds. See page I (c) Consideration of motion approving Statement of Investment Policy for Funds Controlled by Districts' Treasurer. (d) Consideration of motion approving Reverse Repurchase Agreement Guidelines/Master Repurchase Agreement (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to proceed with a $50 million investment program and to report to Directors on investment performance in accordance with adopted policies and guidelines. (f) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to lease the Bloomberg financial reporting system. [ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 71 �...� -6- 04/14/93 `./ (11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (b) (3) Consideration of the following actions relative to Fixed Floating Interest Rate Swap 11993 SWAP): (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to proceed with preliminary 1993 SWAP structuring, utilizing underwriters Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber on a fee contingency basis, subject to final authorization by the Boards to conduct the transaction Ib) Consideration of motion directing staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services for the 1993 SWAP for consideration by the Boards (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Standard and Poor's Rating Agency for review of 1993 SWAP structures in an amount not to exceed $30,000. (d) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Moody's Rating Agency for review of 1993 SWAP structures in an amount not to exceed $30,000. (4) Consideration of the following actions relative to Advanced Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series I: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff and Merrill Lynch to proceed with preliminary steps necessary to structure and bring to market the 1993 Series I, on a fee contingency basis, subject to final authorization by the Boards to conduct the transaction. (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services for the 1993 Series I for consideration by the Boards. (5) Consideration of the following actions relative to Course of Construction Master Program: (a) Consideration of motion directing staff and Robert F. Driver Company to implement the Master Course of �..✓ Construction Program (ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 81 -7- 04/14/93 (11) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from page 7) (b) (5) (b) Consideration of motion appointing Zurich Insurance Company as the insurance carrier for the Master Course of Construction Program, at an estimated annual premium not to exceed $125,625.00 in accordance with terms summarized below: PREMIUM RATE: $.125 per $100 per year LIMITS: $45,000,000 per Occurrence Sublimits: Earthquake: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate Flood: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate Transit: $500,000 Offsite Storage: $500,000 Debris Removal: $5,000,000 Expediting Expense: $250,000 Extra Expense: $1,000,000 DEDUCTIBLES: All Other Perils: $10,000 Flood: $50,000 Earthquake: 5% of values at risk at time of loss subject to $100,000 minimum. TOTAL INSURABLE VALUES: $100,500,000 [ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 91 -8- 04/14/93 ... (11) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from page B) (b) (6) Consideration of the following actions relative to Biofiltration Demonstration Project, amending November 18, 1992 action as follows: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to execute a grant agreement with the Southern California Edison Company for partial funding of said project in the amount of $50,000.00. (b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to execute a specific-term employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services for said project for up to a twelve-month period, at an hourly rate of $21.63 per hour, for a maximum amount not to exceed $45,000.00. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to proceed with the Biofiltration Demonstration Project. (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Building Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on March 18, 1993 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (b) Consideration of action on the following item recommended by the Building Committee: (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-41, approving plans and specifications for Office Trailer Relocation at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (tentative bid date May 11, 1993). See page M (13) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on March 25, 1993 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). [ITEM (13)(B) CONTINUED ON PAGE 101 -9- 04/14/93 (13) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from page 9) (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee: (1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to complete negotiations for an agreement with the OCWD in form approved by General Counsel that would provide up to 50 mgd of secondary effluent to the OCWD for recycling purposes at no charge, with a provision to, at any time, reevaluate the valuation and pricing for secondary effluent; and to provide for purchase of GAP water for 20 years at the audited cost to operate and maintain the GAP facility. (The current 0&M cost is $460.50 per mg or $150 per AF.) The contract would provide that the Districts' cost would not exceed the 0&M cost or the lowest cost of any GAP customer, whichever is less. (2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to execute an agreement with OCWD for pilot plant testing of UV light disinfection technology, with estimated $180,000 costs to be shared equally in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the Districts' portion of out-of-pocket costs for outside consulting services, and $40,000 for the Districts' in-house laboratory services. (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2: (a) Verbal report of Staff (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, clarifying miscellaneous mechanical and electrical items. (c) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, making miscellaneous clarifications. (d) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications, making changes to the General and Special Provisions re Insurance Requirements. (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-42, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2 to Margate �...� Construction, Inc., in the total amount of $14,496,000.00. See page N -10- 04/14/93 1151 ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1: (a) Verbal report of Staff (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, changing the bid date and establishing a date and time for job walk. jcl Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, making miscellaneous technical clarifications. (d) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-43, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount of $3,398,000.00. See page Q . (16) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on March 30, 1993 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (b) Consideration of action on the following Items recommended by the Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers: 11) Approve the three-phase approach for the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawings Systems, Job No. J-25-1, and authorize preceding with implementation. (2) Authorize the Special Selection Committee Re Computers to solicit proposals and negotiate Professional Services Contractls) for the phased approached for consideration by the Boards. (17) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. 11 04/14/93 (17) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from page 11) - (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (18) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (21) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (22) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (29) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn -12- 04/14/93 (31) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (33) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (34) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn (35) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of actions pertaining to request to reduce sewer connection fees for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton: (a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated April 7, 1993. Seepage P (b) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter dated March 17, 1993, from Jan Development Co., requesting reduction of connection fees (attached to Staff Report). �..✓ (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter dated March 18, 1993, from District Chairman Sal Sapien requesting consideration of a reduction of connection fees for said project (attached to Staff Report). (d) Discussion (a) Consideration of action(s) on request to reduce sewer connection fees (36) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (37) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn -13- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-9127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE APRIL 14, 1993 AT 7:30 P.M. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self- explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a): AWARD PURCHASE OF ONE STEAM STERILIZER UNIT (AUTOCLAVE). �./ SPECIFICATION NO. E-226 (REVISED. An autoclave is needed by the Molecular Microbiology section of the Laboratory Division to replace the existing unit which is twenty-two years old. The existing equipment, due to its age, undergoes continuous maintenance which often leaves it unavailable for sterilizing media and labware as well as destroying pathogenic microorganisms necessary for safe disposal. Complete ultraclean sterilization is critical to the molecular biology research and development work. Funds have been allocated for a modern steam sterilizer in the 1992-93 capital equipment budget. On Tuesday, March 16, 1993, sealed bids were received for purchase of a new autoclave. Three bids and one "no bid" were received. The bids ranged from a low of $27,145.00 to a high bid of $36,575.00, plus applicable sales tax. A copy of the bid tabulation and recommendation is attached to the supporting agenda material. Staff recommends that award be made to American Sterilizer Company, the lowest responsible bidder, for One Steam Sterilizer Unit (Autoclave), Specification No. E-226 (Revised), for an amount not to exceed $27,145.00, plus applicable sales tax. April 14, 1993 9(b): PURCHASE OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPH/MASS SPECTROMETER SYSTEM. SPECIFICATION NO. E-228. The Laboratory is responsible for performing analyses of wastewater, industrial source control, ocean monitoring and sludge samples in support of the various activities of the Districts. Gas chromatograph/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) is one of the most basic and powerful instruments for the identification and quantification of organic compounds in these samples. Currently, the Laboratory analyzes industrial source control and NPDES samples for 31 volatile organic compounds following EPA Method 601/602. This method utilizes a gas chromatograph equipped with two detectors in series, a photo ionization detector (PID) and an electrolytic conductivity detector (ELCD). However, according to EPA Method 601/602, positive identification and confirmation of these volatile compounds requires the detection of each compound on either two different detectors or by GC/MS. Only 12 of the original 31 volatile compounds are actually detected by our present PID plus ELCD system. Also, there are an additional 12 compounds that are not identified by this system that can be analyzed using GC/MS technology. The PID and ELCD detectors require time-intensive weekly maintenance which results in considerable downtime for the instruments and delays sample analyses. Laboratory personnel spend approximately five hours per week performing this maintenance which results in an annual cost of about 48,500. Moreover, stability characteristics of the PID and ELCD require weekly external standard calibration and the volatile standards are expensive and unstable. Six standard mixtures at $30 per ampule are prepared on a weekly basis throughout the year. This represents a cost of over $9,000/year for the purchase of volatile standards for Method 601/602. Three GC/MS systems were evaluated; the Hewlett Packard 5972 GC/MS system (an updated version of the 5971), the Varian Saturn, and the VG Fisons MD800. The Varian system was rejected because it utilizes ion trap technology which is not EPA-approved for Method 624. The Fisons MD800 system costs 463,390 plus tax and freight and was rejected because it utilizes a four-rod quadrupole that makes it susceptible to misalignment problems. The Hewlett Packard 5972 GC/MS system costs $62,000 plus tax and represents a cost savings of $1,390. The Hewlett Packard 5972 GC/MS system is recommended because of the detector's past performance in our Laboratory and the following proprietary qualifications: -2. April 14, 1993 1) This system is equipped with a patented, proprietary one-piece quadrupole mass spectrometer. This major design advantage eliminates the drift and misalignment problems commonly encountered with conventional four-rod quadrupole designs. 2) This system is equipped with a patented, proprietary quartz Ion focus lens. This lens system prevents contamination from entering the quadrupole by screening our contaminants before they enter the quadrupole and provides for very rapid cleaning and replacement. Since this instrument will be used for very "dirty" samples, this option will considerably reduce the downtime associated with system maintenance. 3) This system is equipped with electronic pressure control of carrier gas eliminating pressure pulses during injection, resulting in improved instrument performance. 4) This instrument is equipped with dual filaments that are computer selected. This feature reduces downtime due to changing of burned out filaments because it does not require shutting down the Instrument when the first filament burns out. Shutting down and restarting the system requires several hours. 5) The system software is compatible with the existing system and operates in the Windows environment which provides a common interface and user environment. Also, this software autotunes the mass spectrometer to specifications required by EPA criteria, saving analyst time required for manual tuning. 6) Our existing support equipment is a Tekmar purge and trap concentrator and two sixteen-sample position autosampler and is completely compatible with the Hewlett Packard 5972 GC/MS system. Based on the savings for the maintenance of the PID and ELCD detectors ($8,500/year) and the savings in calibration solutions ($9,000/year), the payback period for this system would be approximately 3.5 years. Staff therefore recommends a Hewlett Packard 5972 model for the Purchase of Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer System, Specification No. E-228, from the Hewlett Packard Company, for an amount not to exceed $62,000.00, plus tax and freight. -3- April 14, 1993 9(c): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO 4 TO INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR, JOB NO. 1-9. AND REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB NO. J-22-2. Job No. 1-9, Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, provides for construction of a new 120-Inch effluent pipeline connecting Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2. This $21.3 million project also includes Installation of a new fiber-optic communications cable system between the Control Centers at Plant 1 and Plant 2, and installation of a new digester gas pipeline and industrial water pipeline. Job No. J-22-2, Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfali, increases the size of the old standby ocean outfall pipeline within Plant 2 from 78 inches to 120 Inches and Increases the capacity of the natural gas service to serve the new co-generation facility. Change Order No. 4 adds $83,741.00 and 14 calendar days to the contract with Colich and Sons. Job No. 1-9 Item 1 adds $74,536.00 to the contract for emergency repairs made to the existing 84-inch interplant reinforced concrete pipeline south of the effluent junction box (EJB) at Garfield Avenue, in the west levee of the Santa Ana River. A leak in this pipeline was discovered late last Fall. Colich and Sons, the contractor, had the necessary equipment on site to do this work and with the approaching winter storms, an immediate repair to this line, built in 1965, was necessary. The repair of the pipe was completed in a two-phase process. The first phase involved stabilizing the ground below the 84-inch RCP by pressure grouting. (This work was accomplished by a specialty grouting contractor and payment was issued under a separate purchase order not associated with this contract.) The second phase of the repairs involved excavation and shoring In order to provide access through the south side of the EJB, structural repairs to the 84-inch RCP, installation and removal of an extensive dewatering system to control both ground water, and diversion of effluent from the EJB. This item Includes all costs for the second phase repair. The majority of this emergency work was performed during the months of December 1992 and January 1993 and was interrupted several times due to the heavy rains. Item 2 reduces the amount of retention on the contract progress payments from ten percent (10%) to a total fixed amount of $1,000,000.00 (about 4-1/2% of the ultimate contract amount) for the remainder of the project. This is being done for a couple of reasons. First, in consideration of the fact that a markup of only 5% was charged in Item 1, whereas Section 10-6 of the Districts' -4- April 14, 1993 ..i General Provisions allows a 15% mark-up on labor and materials. In addition, the contract is presently over eighty percent (80%) complete and the Districts have taken beneficial occupancy of two thirds of the completed 120-inch RCP interplant pipeline for use as emergency storage of effluent in storm conditions, if needed. Item 3 is a time extension of 14 days due to inclement weather conditions. The contract included an allowance for inclement weather; the 14 days is an increase for days exceeding the allowance. Job No. J-22-2 Item 4 adds $8,566.00 to the contract for a differential sales tax adjustment on materials purchased from October 1992 through January 1993. Because a state sales tax increase was rumored during preparation of the contract bidding documents, and the project included large material purchases, a stipulation was included that the bid was to be based on a 6.5% sales tax rate. It also stated that the contractor could recover any increase in actual sales tax over 6.5% on purchased materials during the life of the contract. The plans and specifications for the project were approved at the meeting of the Joint Boards on January 9, 1991 and a state sales tax increase went into effect on July 15, 1991. The present sales tax rate of Los Angeles County is 8.25%, with Orange County and Riverside County at 7.75%. Approximately 80% of the materials, which include the large 120-inch reinforced concrete pipe, are being purchased from Hydro Conduit Corporation in Riverside County. Approximately 15% of the materials, including specified pipe bedding materials, are being purchased in Orange County. The sales tax adjustment was calculated from purchase invoices. Some additional sales tax increases for materials purchases are expected for this job and Job No. 1-9 and will be paid for on a future change order. Item 5 adds $639.00 to the contract for removal and capping of an existing 6-inch natural gas pipeline found to be in conflict with construction of the new 120-inch reinforced concrete ocean outfall pipeline. It was necessary to remove interfering portions of the existing gas pipe in order to continue with excavation and placement of the new 120-inch sewer pipe. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $324,666.00 with 14 calendar days time extension. This represents an increase of 1.52% over the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 adding $83,741 .00 and 14 calendar days to the contract with Colich and Sons. -5- April 14, 1993 91d1: APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 20 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1 . Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, is part of the $70 million master-planned Central Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at both plants. This $16.6 million contract includes installation of three pre-purchased digester gas burning, spark-ignited, 3472 horsepower engines with generators which are each capable of producing 2500 kilowatts of electrical power. Change Order No. 20 adds $53,586.00 for twelve items of additional work. Essentially, this contract is now complete. Item 1, in the amount of $14,519.00, is for providing one five-micron natural gas filtering station for each of the three gas driven engines in the Central Power Generation Facility. As previously reported to the Directors, these filters are not required in the contract documents but are recommended by the engine manufacturer and the Districts' consulting engine expert, Advanced Engine Technologies Corporation (AETC)• Item 2, a no-cost item, assigns values for the remaining contract retention into eight milestone events required to complete the project. The respective assigned retention amount will be released to the contractor upon completion of each milestone. The milestones are the result of changed start-up requirements pertaining to resolution of the engine issue with the manufacturer, Cooper, as previously reviewed by the Boards. Item 3, in the amount of $4,912.00, is for providing a temporary shelter for Districts'-supplied electrical load banks required for load testing of the engine generator sets. Initial testing will be against the load banks to avoid possible plant interruptions. The load banks must be located outside and require protection from weather. Item 4, in the amount of $609.00, is for providing additional safety signs inside the Central Power Generation Facility to help protect employees from hot equipment, excessive noise, and to prohibit smoking to prevent possible explosions in hazardous areas. Item 5, in the net amount of $3,290.00, is for providing raceway and cable for absorption chiller controls which were not specifically defined in the contract documents. This item includes a credit for raceway and cable shown in the contract documents but no longer required under the final controls design. Item 6, in the amount of $6,676,00, is for chemical treatment of water in each engine jacket water, heat recovery, steam condensate, boiler feedwater, hot water, and chilled water systems to prevent scaling and corrosion inside the piping and equipment. Item 7, in the amount of $1,679.00, is for providing connection of the steam and heat reservoir piping systems into the existing plant piping systems. These connections are not shown in the contract documents but are required to -6- April 14, 1993 operate these systems inside the Central Power Generation Facility. Item 8, in the amount of $9,942.00, is for providing support for the original equipment lubricating oil filter test performed by the Districts' consulting engine expert, AETC. This test was performed to determine if the filters specified by Cooper function as intended by the engine manufacturer. Preliminary reports on the results indicate that the filters do not function as intended and, as the Directors are aware, that issue is currently being addressed with Cooper. Item 9, in the amount of $1,988.00, is for fire alarm system control panel modifications required to operate the duct-mounted smoke detector located in the HVAC Room necessary to provide interlocking with Air Handling Unit 3 to shutdown the fan in the event of a fire. The conduit and wiring were not shown in the contract documents. Item 10, in the amount of $449.00, is for providing 120 VAC control power for the automatic governor loading controls located in the medium voltage switchgear. This work is not shown in the contract documents but is required to operate the loading controls which are needed for parallel operation of generators. Item 11, in the amount of $7,342.00, is for removing and rerouting 12 KV conduit. The existing raceways at Tunnel Intersection H for these circuits are incorrectly shown on the contract drawings. This item also includes additional conduit for control wiring to the medium voltage switchgear located in the Electric Service Center. Southern California Edison will not allow this wiring to be routed through their enclosures as shown on the contract drawings. Item 12, in the amount of $2,280.00, is for work involved in relocating the 12 KV electrical pull box located in the basement of the Central Power Generation Facility into Intersection I of Tunnel No. 6. Conflicts with adjacent piping systems inside the basement rendered use of the electrical pull box impractical. Staff recommended moving the box into the tunnel intersection where more access is available to pull both contract-specified and future cables through the box. Because the move benefitted the contractor, the contractor provided fifty percent (50%) of the labor and materials required to move the box at no cost. Except for Items 11 and 12, the above described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. Portion of Items 11 and 12 involve rework. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders, to date on this contract, will be $1,255,088.00 with 268 calendar days time extension. This represents an increase of 8.14% over the original contract amount. Of this amount, 1.55% represents the cost of correcting deficiencies in the gas-driven engines and related equipment which were improperly manufactured and prepared for storage by the engine manufacturer which has been previously reported to the Directors. -7- April 14, 1993 Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 20 adding $53,586.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9(e): AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS RE SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P11-36. AND SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. 132-42. In October 1989, the Directors awarded a professional services agreement for preparation of plans and specifications for design and construction support services to expand the secondary treatment facilities' capacity from 46 million gallons per day (MGD) to 80 MGD at Plant No. 1, and from 75 MGD to 90 MGD at Plant No. 2. This design and construction effort includes extensive structural and mechanical modifications to existing facilities, expansion of secondary facilities and provides for various miscellaneous support facilities. Job No. P7-36, the secondary treatment expansion at Plant No. 1, is under design with completion scheduled this year. Job No. P2-42, the secondary expansion at Plant No. 2, is divided into two contracts; Job No. P2-42-1 is the electrification of pump drives at Plant No. 2 and 132-42-2 is the secondary treatment expansion. Job No. P2-42-2 was bid in March and award of a construction contract is recommended under a separate item (see Item 14.) As the design for the Plant No. 1 secondary treatment expansion has progressed, several modifications and changes have been identified that staff believes will enhance the treatment process, provide operational flexibility, increase reliability and improve our ability to continue to meet our NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit requirements imposed by the U.S. EPA and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. These Include: a) modifications to the existing air diffusion headers; b) provide an automatic influent control system; c) increase return activated sludge flow rates; and d) provide pumping flexibility in the plant effluent pump station. The major change is the proposed modification of the air diffusion headers. During the activated sludge secondary treatment process, air is introduced into the wastewater in huge aerator basins to stimulate the biological removal of pollutants. There are several types of devices that can be used to help attain broad diffusion of the air with the wastewater. During the preliminary design -8- April 14, 1993 �..i of the system expansion at Plant No. 1, it was proposed to use the same type of air diffusers that are currently utilized in the Plant No. 1 secondary treatment facility. The existing system, which has worked very well, uses a round membrane tube, or "sock" design to diffuse the air. Because the air diffusion is so critical to effectiveness and efficiency of the secondary treatment process, the Operations and Engineering staffs are recommending that the consultant investigate, test a new flat plate design to determine if an alternative to the existing system could result in substantial savings in future energy costs and more effective treatment removal rates. (This is not an issue at Plant No. 2 because that plant uses pure oxygen in its secondary treatment system rather than air.) The proposed new work would include a detailed study of the performance of the new plate design at other facilities, and a report on the economics related to power savings that could be expected. Since there are no two treatment plants with identical sewage characteristics or operating modes, a pilot study is also advisable. The engineer would also provide support for a pilot project to test the plate diffusers. If the tests determine that a new device is appropriate, it would be designed into the existing basins when the final P1-36 project is let for bidding, in about one year. `j Staff is therefore recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate Addendum No. 2 with John Carollo Engineers to change the scope of work to provide the additional engineering services for the design of Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, to include the above described work. Fallowing the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed addendum will be presented to the Boards for consideration. 9(f): AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND NEGOTIATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CHEMICAL AND WASTEHAULER FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P7-46, AND CHEMICAL AND PLANT WATER FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO, 2. JOB NO, P2-55. This project is a continuation of a series of projects to modify or upgrade existing facilities to eliminate hazards, improve reliability and efficiency and accommodate future master-planned construction. This project will provide -9- April 14, 1993 alternate chemicals to replace gaseous chlorine applications now used In the treatment plants; modifications to our wastehauler receiving facilities to correct deficiencies and improve operational flexibility and reliability; and improvements to our plant water facilities and digester gas compressors. Elimination of Gaseous Chlorine. Chlorine is a very hazardous substance that is widely used at the Districts' facilities and treatment plants worldwide for odor control and disinfection. Recently published standards revisions contain requirements which may restrict Its use but still not eliminate the potential of a calamity from a major leak. The Districts have tested alternative chemicals and are currently using bleach as a substitute in some foul air scrubbers and are testing hydrogen peroxide for odor control in the plant influent. The proposed project will Investigate using alternative chemicals for all chlorine applications in the treatment plants. Wastehauler Facility Modifications. At Plant No. 1, we have a dump facility that accepts pumped wastes from septic systems as well as certain high- solids industrial waste that are trucked to the plant by wastehaulers. It is the only one of its kind in the area. Although our wastehauler dump facility is relatively new, it has experienced continual problems because of clogging of the system which results in high maintenance. When the system was designed the significant amount of debris that is often in the trucked wastes was unknown. The project consultant will investigate Innovative dump methods and alternatives, contents of waste, and recommend modifications to allow us to more readily accommodate the waste on a continuing basis. A secondary system for placing certain high-strength waste directly into the sludge digesters will also be considered to determine if It would be more efficient. Improvements to control odors and security will also be modified as necessary. Plant Water Supply. At Plant No. 2, current plant water (secondary treated wastewater) used for operational requirements averages 7.5 million gallons per day (mgd), with a range reported in December 1992 of 5.58 mgd to 9.09 mgd. This water has many uses, including cooling, heating and washing. The plant water source is currently secondary effluent from Plant No. 1. Recently, the Plant No. 1 effluent was routed to the 84-inch Interplant line from an old 42-inch line and the 42-inch line has been demolished to make way for the new interplant utility construction project, Job No. 1-9, now nearly complete. With the diversion of the secondary effluent to the 84-inch interplant line and combination of this flow with primary effluent, a decrease in plant water quality has been observed at Plant No. 2 which has impacted the operational and maintenance reliability of systems using the plant water. -10- April 14, 1993 It is therefore proposed to evaluate and recommend alternatives to provide secondary effluent from the Plant No. 2 secondary facility. Items for consideration will include gravity and pump facilities, filtration, constructability and costs. The evaluation will also address the effects of a new filtration system to be installed at the existing plant water station (Job No. P2-43-1) on the quality of the plant water. Diaester Gas Cornoressors. An evaluation of the plant water used for cooling digester gas compressors is proposed to determine the feasibility of providing an improved cooling system to extend the service life of the compressors. The plant water now used for cooling, partly because of the water quality problem discussed above, may not be the best cooling source. Alternatives include a closed loop cooling system for the digester gas compressors with filtration and chemical treatment. The evaluation will address water quality and flow requirements and determine the best water source for the cooling system. Staff is recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate a professional services agreement providing for engineering evaluation, preparation of design and plans and specifications, for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the agreement will be presented �..i to the Directors for consideration. 9(g): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CH2M HILL FOR EXPANSION OF EXISTING COMPUTERIZED MONITORING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AT PLANTS 1 AND 2. JOB NO, J-31 . Over the past few years the Directors have approved contracts to install computer systems to monitor and operate various portions of the treatment plant processes. These include the control system for the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (OOBS) at Plant No. 2, a new pump station telemetry system for outlying pumping stations, replacement of the existing obsolete computer monitoring system at Plant No. 2, and a new computer monitoring system for Plant No. 1. The Districts currently operate 31 local computer control systems installed under several different plant projects. The largest of the Districts' computer instrumentation projects are Jobs Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44, Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, respectively, bid together at a cost of $3.8 million. This project is now underway. When completed, this -11- April 14, 1993 baseline system will allow access to different process monitoring units from various locations throughout the plants and provide an orderly method to sound necessary alarms and store process data. However, additional work is needed to complete the system, including the intertie of the 31 existing and planned additional computer monitoring systems. This work was not included in the original contract because all of the systems were not complete and there was no way of knowing exactly what would be required until now. It now appears that this work could best be combined with other needed work, including the upgrade of the control system for OOBS. It is also recommended that computer graphics, representing new plant processes which have been added since the J-23-2 and P2-44 supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) project was awarded, be added to assist staff in operating and controlling the facilities. About five years ago, the OOBS control system was installed. Since then, the control system has not met expectations. The system was installed under Job No. J-15A, which has yet to be accepted by the Directors because of several outstanding items, all of which are being resolved with the contractor. However, the specific computer control system is based on now-outdated technologies and, in fact, various pieces of hardware already cannot be replaced because manufacturers no longer make the parts. Therefore, it may be less costly to replace the system than continue to maintain it. (We have not paid the original contractor for this work, reserving funds to insure that deficient portions, or the complete system, can be replaced.) Jobs Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 include the installation of new computer monitoring systems. The specifications for those projects required that the contractor install equipment which could receive and deliver messages to and from the OOBS computer control system. This requirement was common to each manufacturer who bid the project, i.e., each has a different language and had to interlink their system with the existing OOBS system. Since the OOBS computer control system is not satisfactory, staff believes it would compound the OOBS problems to tie the system into the Districts-wide monitoring computer network. Therefore, in December 1992, the intertie was deleted and a credit for $87,438.00 was received. The credit for deleting the intertie to the OOBS computer control system, added to the cost of replacing worn out hardware, is approximately equal to the cost of designing and building a simpler system using the most modern technology; that is, programmable logic computer-based control equipment (PLCs). Our staff is familiar with PLC equipment since we have about thirty separate functions now in -12- April 14, 1993 �./ progress using the PLCs. Parts replacement is much simpler: there are no hard drives as the older GOBS computer control systems contain. Therefore, staff believes that the GOBS project should be reanalyzed by control systems engineers who can make recommendations about whether the staff position is correct and find the most economical way to upgrade the reliability of the existing OOBS control system, either by repair or replacement. To address these issues, in January the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals for a professional services agreement for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31. The Selection Committee has negotiated a professional services agreement with CH2M Hill to prepare the design plans and specifications, and provide construction support services, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, for an amount not to exceed $690,148.00. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting �./ agenda documents. 9(h): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR STANDBY POWER RELIABILITY MODIFICATIONS. JOB NO. J-33, AND OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES. JOB NO. J-34. At the regular meeting in December, the Directors received a report from staff regarding the major impacts on our facilities of the intense rain storm which passed through Orange County on December 7, 1992. That storm produced the highest flows ever treated through the plant, a rate of 485 million gallons per day, sustained for about two hours. Staff was very pleased that the facilities were able to handle this flow without major incident, nonetheless we have had several debriefing meetings to analyze the storm effects and the operational lessons that could be learned from the storm and where our system needs improvement to minimize potential failures during emergency situations such as were experienced on December 7. -13- April 14, 1993 As part of that exercise, we have anticipated, based on the most current information, what might have happened if certain critical facilities failed. The key to keeping our treatment plants operating and to avoiding pollution during natural or man-made emergency situations is system reliability and redundancy. The Directors have repeatedly supported this concept and its importance. Our standards provide for backup equipment at every level, as well as several sources of power to ensure service under the most difficult circumstances. Electrical outages, for instance, are most likely to occur during a severe storm event. Because of that, the Districts have two sources of Edison power at each plant plus standby electrical generation. Soon our power supply will have even higher reliability when the Central Power Generation project is on line. Nonetheless, because of the December 7 storm experience, staff evaluations have identified the need for increased standby power at various critical locations within both plants, including the outfall disposal facilities. The first is the addition to and modification of existing standby electrical and engine-driven equipment. The standby power work will include critical deployment of new and existing standby generators, the securing of the necessary South Coast Air Quality Management District permits for this equipment, providing two sources of fuel to standby engines used to drive standby pumps, and other work to increase electrical reliability. The second is modifications to our standby ocean outfall (old Ocean Outfall No. 1), including raising the height and seismic strengthening of the older of the two surge towers on the outfall system. The ocean outfall modifications would be largely structural. The work would include a re-valving and re-piping adjacent to the older surge tower, raising the height of the surge tower, and changes to our California Regional Water Quality Control Board/U.S. Environmental Protection Agency NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit to allow use of our standby outfall in an extreme storm situation. By using the standby ocean outfall, the Districts would be able to safely increase the treatment plant flow-through. In January, because of the urgency of these projects, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate with John Carollo Engineers for this work. Carollo has a blend of experience and expertise which should allow this important project to move at an accelerated pace. Carollo prepared that portion of our 1989 Master Plan which deals with both these issues. They have performed past designs for the Districts which are very similar and were successfully completed. Those projects include the raising of Surge Tower No. 1, the design of our Ocean Outfall system and several projects to increase electrical reliability including standby power generating equipment facilities. The estimated construction cost for both projects, Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34, is $20 million. A project report will be prepared on all the work items, with design following on -14- April 14, 1993 �./ about half the work. The remaining portion of the work will be Identified in the project report for future design, and the fees for that design work will be negotiated separately. The Selection Committee has negotiated a fee for the engineering services with John Carollo Engineers, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, for an amount not to exceed $950,252.00. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting agenda documents. DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 9(i): AUTHORIZING SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND NEGOTIATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR GISLER-RED HILL PARALLEL FORCE MAIN, FROM COLLEGE AVENUE PUMP STATION TO IOWA STREET, CONTRACT NO, 7-23. The College Avenue Pump Station and Force Main, Contract No. 7-1C, was constructed in 1967 and delivers flow from the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-1 B, south of and parallel to the 405 Freeway, to the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer (Schedule C). The pump station, located on College Avenue at Gisler Avenue, about 1/4-mile east of Harbor Boulevard, serves portions of the cities of Irvine, Tustin, Costa Mesa and Santa Ana. The single force main includes 1,833 linear feet of 21-inch Techite pipe in Gisler Avenue from College Avenue to east of Iowa Street. Between 1967 and 1982, the Districts used Techite pipe as an alternate material for force main construction. In the past two years, the Districts have experienced failures in the Techite pipe force mains. The Districts have since learned that others have also experience problems with the pipe and that Techite pipe manufacturer's claims regarding the pipe's quality are false. Mr. David Griffin, an attorney specializing in Techite pipe failure cases, was retained to review the potential of recovering costs from the manufacturers of Techite pipe. At a special Districts 3 and 7 Adjourned Board Meeting in January, the Directors authorized funds to allow staff and counsel to take samples of the Techite pipe; prepare's brief; and, if the testing supports it, file a claim against the Techite pipe manufacturer. -15- April 14, 1993 Staff now believes that, based on the facts presented by Mr. Griffin in his report, all Techite pipe Installed by the Districts' (including the College Avenue Pump Station Force Main) should be replaced or taken out of service, as soon as possible to minimize the potential for further failure. The Districts are currently preparing plans for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, Contract No. 14-1-1A, part of which is in Gisler Avenue from Cinnamon Avenue past Iowa Street. The Districts have incorporated the construction of a parallel force main into the plans for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Cinnamon Avenue to the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer (Schedule C), approximately 700 linear feet. This will avoid repeated, prolonged excavations in Gisler Avenue. This project will be designed using a coated ductile iron pipe parallel force main for the remaining length of the College Avenue Pump Station Force Main. Staff recommends that the Directors authorize the Selection Committee to solicit a proposal and negotiate a professional services agreement with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the preparation of plans and specifications for Gisler- Red Hill Parallel Force Main, from College Avenue Pump Station to Iowa Street, Contract No. 7-23. Boyle is the designer of the much larger Baker-Gisler Interceptor, into which portions of this work could easily be included. The estimated cost of the new force main is $300,000. DISTRICT 3 9(j): RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE KEITH COMPANIES FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES RE REPLACEMENT OF WESTMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAINS. (FIRST AND SECOND UNITS) AND NEW WESTSIDE PUMP STATION FORCE MAIN, CONTRACT NO, 3-36R. The western portion of District No. 3 drains to a collection system served by the Seal Beach Pump Station located on the northeast corner of Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue. Wastewater from this system is pumped easterly through a dual force main system to a gravity sewer located half-way between Boise Chica Avenue and Springdale Avenue. Both force mains are made of 30-Inch diameter Techite pipe. The first of these mains, the Westminster Avenue Force Main, First Unit, Contract No. 3.13, was installed in 1970, the Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, in 1978. -16- April 14, 1993 The most recent of several breaks in these lines occurred on August 19, 1991 . The same line previously broke a few hundred feet away in March 1990, necessitating repairs at that time. (Repair kits are becoming exceedingly hard to find because Techite pipe is no longer manufactured.) While replacing the most heavily damaged 20-foot portion of the pipe, staff was able to view adjacent pipe sections on both sides of the broken pipe and found them cracked as well. In September 1991, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a professional services agreement for preparation of a project report, plans and specifications, and to provide construction support services for the Replacement of the Westminster Avenue Force Main, First Unit, Contract No. 3-13R-2. That project has been held in abeyance pending a determination on the condition of Unit 2. At an Adjourned District No. 3 Board meeting on January 20, 1993, the Directors viewed a videotape of the Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, which showed that both force mains need replacing. At the Adjourned meeting of District No. 3 in January, the Directors authorized staff to retain Special Counsel to prepare a claim against the manufacturer for the replacement costs of the Westminster Avenue dual force mains and to take samples necessary to support the claim. In addition, the Directors authorized the issuance of purchase orders to two laboratories to perform the analytical and forensic work. Staff prepared plans for the removal of a section of each of the two force mains. Bids were received and a contract awarded to Colich & Sons for the removal of the samples. The work is complete. The two samples are being shipped to a laboratory in Colorado. It is expected that the laboratory results will be received in about a month. The claim will then be prepared by staff, General Counsel and Special Counsel, Mr. David Griffin. The Selection Committee has negotiated a Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies for preparation of a project report, plans and specifications and construction support services, for an amount not to exceed $85,683.00, based on hourly rates, plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees and fixed profit. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached the supporting agenda documents. -17- April 14, 1993 ALL DISTRICTS 11 : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF FISCAL POLICY/EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on March 17, 1993, and the Executive Committee on February 24, 1993. Enclosed for the Directors are written reports on their deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 12: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE. The Building Committee met on March 18, 1993. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on the Committee's deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 13: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CONSERVATION. RECLAMATION AND RECYCLE COMMITTEE. The Conservation, Reclamation and Recycle Committee met on March 25, 1993. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 14: APPROVE ADDENDA NOS. 1 . 2 AND 3 AND AWARD SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-42-2. In accordance with our 1989 Master Plan, construction plans and specifications have been prepared for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2. In October 1989, the Directors authorized the design and construction of a series of projects that will upgrade and expand the existing secondary treatment capacity at both plants. Job No. P7-36, additional secondary treatment at Plant No. 1, is currently under design and will be submitted to the Directors for approval when plans, specifications and funding are in place. In March, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for construction of Job No. P2-42-2, which will extend the existing twelve secondary treatment clarifiers at Plant No. 2 an additional 50 feet south, toward the Talbert Flood Control Channel. This modification will provide additional treatment by using more area for settling solids and produce a higher quality effluent while treating an additional 15 million gallons per day (MGD), increasing the capacity from 75 to 90 MGD. Work also includes replacement of the clarifier internal mechanisms and drives, constructing an additional dissolved air flotation thickener, rehabilitating three existing dissolved air flotation thickeners and construction of a new waste sidestream pump station. -18. April 14, 1993 Permits have been received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District, Orange County EMA and the California Coastal Commission. Other agencies involved in the permitting process were the California Department of Fish and Game and the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife Services. Permit requirements and our own environmental mitigation measures are Included in the plans and specifications. (1) Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications modifies the Schedule of Prices to include a separate line item for Builders' All- Risk Insurance. Clarifications of structural, mechanical and electrical items and corrections to miscellaneous Items In the bid documents are Included. (2) Addendum No. 2 Addendum No. 2 provides for further clarification of miscellaneous mechanical and electrical items. (3) Addendum No. 3 Addendum No. 3 makes changes to the insurance requirements in the General and Special Provisions. (4) Award Job No. 152-42-2 On March 16, 1993, six bids were received for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2. The bids ranged from a high of $16,517,131 .00 to a low of $14,496,000.00 submitted by Margate Construction, Inc. A complete bid tabulation and recommendation is attached with the supporting agenda material. Staff recommends approval of Addenda Nos. 1, 2 and 3, receiving and filing the bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding a contract to Margate Construction, Inc., for their low bid of $14,496,000,00. The engineer's estimate was $22,000,000. Ift./ -19- April 14, 1993 15: APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 1 AND AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION OF \r PRIORITY PROJECTS ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-43-1. Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, include over 100 relatively small miscellaneous improvements to various facilities throughout both treatment plants. The proposed improvements will improve safety, process reliability and performance, and replace obsolete equipment and systems with improved ones. These items have been split between five smaller projects categorized as higher priority projects at each plant, lower priority projects at each plant, and security and landscaping improvements at Plant No. 1. This job, Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, is the first in the series of five construction projects to be ready for bidding. There are forty-nine items of work included in these construction documents. The following summarizes the larger items of work to be constructed: - Walkways at the grit screws for improved maintenance access and safety - Platforms at the belt presses for improved maintenance access and safety Modifications at an effluent junction box for an emergency valve bypass to the outfall pipe Chemical storage tank containment areas to prevent contamination - Walkways at the rectangular primary basins for improved operations access and safety - Paving for improved drainage in specified areas - Bleach storage facility for the North Complex Foul Air Scrubbers - Test meter facility for large flow meters - Air filters for the fresh air supply to the Ocean Outfall Booster Station New strainers for the plant water system - A bypass to the plant water pump station for added reliability Rehabilitation of the truck wash facility - Addition of a standby fan at the trunkline scrubbers - Replacement of the demisting sections of the scrubbers - Removal and replacement of asbestos insulated steam piping - Addition of a caustic storage tank for venting of chlorine gas at the chlorine station -20- April 14, 1993 - Handrails and stairs for improved access and safety at the circular clarifiers - Anionic emulsion polymer storage and feed facility. The Directors approved the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-43-1 in March 1993. (1) AddendumNo. 1 Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for this project set forth a date and time for a job walk for the asbestos insulation removal task and changed the bid date from March 11, 1993, to March 23, 1993. (2) Addendum No. 2 Addendum No. 2 included numerous miscellaneous changes and clarifications. (3) Award of Job No. P2-43-1 On March 23, 1993, ten bids were received for the subject ..i construction project. The bids ranged from a high of $4,482,725.00 to a low of $3,398,000.00 submitted by Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the agenda. Staff recommends approval of Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 and award to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for their low bid of $3,398,000.00. The engineer's estimate for the work was $4,800,000. 16: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPECIAL SELECTION COMMITTEE RE COMPUTERIZATION. The Special Joint Works Selection Committee Re Computerization met on March 30, 1993. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations and recommended action for consideration by the Boards. -21- April 14, 1993 17: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. DISTRICT 3 35: CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO REDUCE SEWER CONNECTION FEES FOR PARK STANTON PLACE SENIOR CITIZENS APARTMENTS. Enclosed with the supporting agenda documents is a staff report and copies of letters requesting consideration of a reduction in the sewer connection fees for the Park Stanton Place Senior Citizens Apartments in the City of Stanton. jeral Ivester pager JWS:jt -22- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ui ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 108C ELL19 AVENUE AD Box al.RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92929-8127 7141962-2411 March 24, 1993 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meetina Date: March 24. 1993 - 5:30 o.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Director Gail Kerry Evelyn Hart Vice Joint Chairman Betty Mrgudich, Rourke, Woodruff Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman and Spradlin Robert Richardson Chairman, District 1 James Parker, Rourke, Woodruff Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 and Spradlin John C. Cox, Jr. Chairman, District 5 Ed Long, Mudge Rose James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Elke Chenevey, Merrill Lynch Charles E. Puckett Chairman, District 7 Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 STAFF: �..i John M. Gullixson Chairman, District 13 Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Roger R. Stanton County Supervisor Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering William Steiner County Supervisor Gary Streed, Director of Finance Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Absent: Maintenance Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Buck Catlin Past Joint Chairman Operations Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 2 Patti Gorzcyca, Financial Manager Ed Torres, Air Quality Manager 1) Report and Recommendations of the Fiscal Policy Committee. Fiscal Policy Committee Chairman Puckett reported that the Committee met on March 17th and considered several items of business. Enclosed is a copy of the Committee's report on their deliberations. The following summarizes the recommended action items: March 24, 1993 A. Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1992 Series - Soecial Counsel Fees. Mudge Rose was engaged to provide special bond counsel services in connection with the Advanced Refunding Certificates of Participation 1992 Series, on a per diem rate basis for an amount not to exceed $110,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses. Mr. Ed Long of Mudge Rose appeared before the Fiscal Policy Committee and reported that the transaction had required a much greater effort than originally anticipated and his firm had incurred fees totaling $280,000, and the reasons therefore as described in his letter of January 7, attached to the Fiscal Policy Committee Report. Mr. Long requested that the Directors approve an adjustment in the Mudge Rose fees to $180,000, and stated that his firm would absorb the balance of $100,000. The Fiscal Policy Committee deliberated the request of Mudge Rose at considerable length and recommended to the Executive Committee that the Boards respectfully deny the request for a fee increase, and that payment be made in the amount of the original contract fee of $110,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses. Executive Committee Recommendation: Mr. Long met with the Executive Committee in closed session and presented his request for a fee increase; following which he was excused and the Committee deliberated the Mudge Rose request at considerable length. The Executive Committee recommends that the Boards approve an increase in the fee from $110,000 to $150,000, plus out-of- pocket expenses, provided that Mudge Rose execute a waiver and release of any and all other fees for this transaction. B. Investment Management Policy and Reverse Repurchase Agreements. At the January 27th Executive Committee meeting Director Swan asked for a review of the Districts' investment policy, now administered solely by the County Treasurer, to determine the 2 March 24, 1993 desirability of providing staff with the flexibility of managing a portion of the Districts' reserve fund investment portfolio, for the following reasons: - Such a program would not be unique and, in fact, is practiced by many agencies in California. - Based on the market history for the past five years the Districts could expect to realize substantial annual investment interest earnings from such a program. (Had such a program been in place for the past 18 months, it would have earned additional interest in the amount of $2.2 million.) - The risks associated with such a program are no greater than risks associated with the Districts' existing debt financing and related transactions. A report prepared by the Districts' financial team was reviewed by the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee at their February meetings and it was the consensus of the Directors that implementation of such a program would be beneficial to the Districts, and staff and counsel were directed to draft the necessary implementation documents for review by the Committee. The Committee reviewed the various documents necessary to implement the changes in the Districts' investment management program; as well as a memorandum from Past Joint Chairman A. B. Catlin, which raised several questions concerning such a program, and the information provided by staff in response to Director Catlin's questions. Staff also reported that they had reviewed internal control requirements with the Districts' independent auditing firm and referred to KPMG's letter. (Copies attached to Fiscal Policy Committee Report.) Staff also reported that the matter had been discussed at great length with the Orange County Treasurer, who indicates support for the reverse repurchase program which is the same practice he utilizes and is largely responsible for his ability to realize such an excellent record of investment returns for funds deposited in the -3- March 24, 1993 County's commingled investment pool. However, since implementation of such a program contemplates the naming of both a District Treasurer, as well as utilization of the County Treasurer's services, Mr. Citron has requested that County Counsel clarify whether or not that would impact the duties that the County Treasurer provides on behalf of the Districts. At the Executive Committee meeting staff and counsel reviewed the County Treasurer's questions (see enclosed memorandum from the General Counsel dated March 23, 1993 [gray]). A resolution of this issue by County Counsel is anticipated prior to the meeting of the Joint Boards on April 14th. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation that a revised investment policy/reverse repurchase policy be implemented by the following actions, subject to satisfactory resolution of any questions by the Orange County Treasurer pertaining to banking services provided by his office on behalf of the Districts: (1) Appoint Merrill Lynch, the Districts' underwriter who also works closely with the County Treasurer's investment program, to serve as the primary dealer for reverse repurchase transactions. Merrill Lynch would charge no remuneration on investments, since a spread is already included in the price of the securities. (2) Approve the following documents necessary to implement the program: (a) Resolution Designating a Districts' Treasurer and Authorizing the Districts' Treasurer and the Orange County Tax Collector-Treasurer to Invest and/or Reinvest Districts' Funds; (b) Statement of Investment Policy for Funds Controlled by Districts' Treasurer; -4- March 24, 1993 (c) Reverse Repurchase Agreement Guidelines/Master Repurchase Agreement. (3) Authorize staff to proceed with a $50 million investment program and to report to the Directors on investment performance in accordance with adopted policies and guidelines. (4) Authorize staff to lease the Bloomberg financial reporting system. (The estimated annual cost is within staff's purchasing authority. The first year's costs, including installation and other one-time costs is expected to be $21,000.) Director Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. C. Strategy for Fixed Floating Interest Rate Swao (1993 Swao). The Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed a strategy for a fixed floating interest rate swap in 1993 that could earn the Districts an estimated $1 - 2+ million in interest annually. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation that the following actions be approved: (1) Authorize staff to proceed with preliminary 1993 SWAP structuring for consideration by the Committee in April, utilizing Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber on a fee contingency basis, subject to final authorization to conduct the transaction by the Boards. (2) Direct staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services for the 1993 SWAP for consideration by the Committee at the next meeting. -5- March 24, 1993 (3) Authorize staff to issue purchase orders to both the Rating Agencies, Standard and Poor's and Moody's, for review of 1993 SWAP structures in amounts not to exceed $30,000 each. The financial team will report back to the Fiscal Policy Committee with a proposed structure and contractual arrangements with underwriters and bond counsel for final approval before proceeding with any transaction. Director Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. D. Advanced Refunding Certificates of Particioation. 1993 Series I. The Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed a proposal for Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series I, which would refund the remaining Series B COP's, and potentially save the Districts approximately $2.5 million. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation that the following actions be approved: (1) Authorize staff and Merrill Lynch to proceed with preliminary steps necessary to structure and bring to market the Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series I, once the target 3% level is achieved. Staff and the financing team will report next month to the Fiscal Policy on the recommended advance refunding structure and potential savings. (2) Direct staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services for Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series 1, for consideration by the Committee at the next meeting. -6- March 24, 1993 The financial team will report back to the Fiscal Policy Committee with a proposed structure and contractual arrangements with underwriters and bond counsel for final approval before proceeding with any transaction. Director Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. E. Course of Construction Master Program. The Districts' insurance broker, Robert F. Driver Company, has recommended that the Districts consider a Course of Construction Master Insurance Program wherein the Districts would insure all- risk contingencies on all facilities under construction, in lieu of requiring each individual construction contractor to provide insurance on their individual projects. Under such a program it is estimated that the Districts could save approximately $61,000 annually, based on a construction activity level of $100.5 million. �./ Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation that the following actions be approved: (1) Direct staff and Robert F. Driver to implement the Master Course of Construction Program and to report to the Committee semiannually with program results. (2) Select Zurich Insurance Company as the insurance carrier for the Master Course of Construction Program, at an estimated annual premium not to exceed $125,625 in accordance with the terms of the enclosed report, as summarized on the following page: -7- March 24, 1993 PREMIUM RATE: $.125 per $100 per year LIMITS: $45,000,000 per Occurrence Sublimits: Earthquake: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate Flood: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate Transit: $500,000 Offsite Storage: $500,000 Debris Removal: $5,000,000 Expediting Expense: $250,000 Extra Expense: $1,000,000 DEDUCTIBLES: All Other Perils: $10,000 Flood: $50,000 Earthquake: 5% of values at risk at time of loss subject to $100,000 minimum. TOTAL INSURABLE VALUES: $100,500,000 v -8- March 24, 1993 2) Public Notification Proaram Reauired by AB 2588 - Toxics Hot Soots Information Assessment Act, 1987. At the October 1992 Executive Committee meeting, staff reported to the Directors on the requirements of AB 2588 to determine toxic air emissions from specified facilities, conduct health risk assessments and to notify the public adjacent to the facilities of potential impacts. The Districts' treatment plants in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach are subject to the requirements of AB 2588. SCAQMD has determined that a theoretical risk of contracting cancer greater than 10 in-a-million poses a potential health risk and requires public notification. Based on this criterion, a total of approximately 300 households located in Costa Mesa on the east side of the Santa Ana River across from Plant 1, and in Huntington Beach on the west side of Brookhurst across from Plant 2 may be impacted. No homes in Fountain Valley or Newport Beach are affected. Staff briefly reviewed the enclosed (tan) report which provides more detailed information. Nwo, The required public notification, is in the form of an official notice prepared by the SCAQMD and mailed by the Districts, a draft copy of which is attached to the staff report. The Districts may also include additional information pertaining to the matter with the SCAQMD notice and staff has drafted a package which it proposes to send along with SCAQMD's notice. Draft copies of the proposed Districts' letter and information to be sent along with the official SCAQMD notice is attached to the staff report. In addition to the notification, staff is proposing to conduct community meetings to which the public will be invited, after first providing information and briefings to the Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, Huntington Beach and Newport Beach city staffs. After reviewing the staff report and proposed Districts' letter and information to be sent to the 300 households in Costa Mesa and Huntington Beach with the SCAQMD's official notice, the Committee directed staff to proceed with the plan outlined for compliance with the AB 2588 requirements. -9- March 24, 1993 3) Biofiltration Demonstration Project. Last November the Boards authorized staff to conduct a biofiltration demonstration project to study the feasibility of utilizing this technology to remove toxic, volatile organic and odorous air emissions from our treatment plant. The purpose of the research project is to develop sound technical and scientific information that can be utilized in arguing for rational air quality standards that could potentially save the Districts significant capital and operating costs, yet still be appropriate. At the time of Board approval staff indicated that an interest in grant funding participation in the project had been expressed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District ($124,568) and the Water Environment Research Federation ($30,000)• Since then Southern California Edison Company has also expressed an interest. The project funding allocation is as follows: Demonstration Project Funding November Current 1992 Source Proposal Proposal SCAQMD $125,000 $124,568 WERF 30,000 30,000 SCE 50,000 -0- Sanitation Districts 75,000 125,432 Total $280,000 $280,000 Staff briefly reviewed the enclosed report (salmon) which explains the project and its status in more detail, and recommended that the Board action of November 18, 1992, authorizing staff to Conduct the Biofiltration Demonstration Project, be amended to add the following: A. Authorize the General Manager to execute a grant agreement with the Southern California Edison Company for partial funding of the Biofiltration Project in the amount of $50,000. -10- March 24, 1993 B. Authorize the General Manager to execute a specific-term- employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services for up to a twelve (12) month period, at an hourly rate for total compensation of $21.63 per hour, for a maximum amount not to exceed $45,000. C. Authorize the Biofiltration Demonstration to immediately proceed. Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee concurs with staff's recommendation to amend the previous Board action for the Biofiltration Demonstration Project and authorize the project to proceed. 4) Status Reoort Re Central Power Generation System Projects. Staff provided the Committee with a verbal status report on progress towards completion of the Central Power Generation System projects at �./ Plants Nos. 1 and 2. JWS:sc Enclosures wpd-W.A...MW32493.. -11- r RESOLUTION NO. 93- DESIGNATING A DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS'TREASURER AND THE ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER/TAX COLLECTOR TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 73-18 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY,CALIFORNIA,DESIGNATING A DISTRICTS'TREASURER AND AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER/TAX COLLECTOR TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 73-18 rrrrrrrrrrrr The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That is hereby appointed as Treasurer of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California. Section 2: The authority of the Boards of Directors to invest or reinvest Districts' surplus funds or to sell or exchange securities so purchased or to deposit for safekeeping the funds and investments of the Districts with depositories as provided for in California Government Code Sections 53608 and 53630, is hereby delegated to the Districts' Treasurer, as authorized by California Government Code Section 53607. Section : The Districts' Treasurer is authorized to direct that the Districts' surplus funds or any portion thereof be deposited into the care, custody and control of the Treasurer/Tax Collector of the County of Orange for purposes of investment or reinvestment, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53684. 1 Section 4: That the Treasurer/Tax Collector of the County of Orange (County Treasurer) be and is hereby authorized and directed to invest or to reinvest all funds belonging 'fir to the Districts, which have been transferred to the County Treasurer, in those instruments as authorized by California Government Code Section 53601 and/or in deposits with depositories, as authorized by California Government Code Section 53635. The County Treasurer is further authorized and directed to sell or exchange securities so purchased and to terminate or renew deposits so made. Each of these authorizations is to continue until the further order of the Boards of Directors of the Districts or the Districts' Treasurer. Section 5: - That these investments, deposits, sales of investments, termination or renewal of deposits, are to be made by the Districts' Treasurer and Treasurer/Tax Collector of the County of Orange only after consultation with and direction by the General Manager of the Districts or his designee. Section 6: That the Districts' Treasurer and Treasurer/Tax Collector of the , County of Orange, upon confirmation by the General Manager of the Districts, are hereby authorized and directed to prepare such records of account as are necessary to effect the transfer of funds required to make the indicated investments. Section 7: In the event of the temporary absence of the Districts' Treasurer, the Districts' General Manager is hereby delegated the authority to appoint an Acting Treasurer to carry out the powers and duties of the office of the Districts' Treasurer. Section 8: Resolution No. 73-18 is hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held , 1993 nw:pj(Baq 2 `� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA March 17, 1993 tOBGG ELLIS AVENUE P.O..BOX 6127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.MIAORN1A 2272118127 71AI SS2 2an REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE Meeting Date: March 17, 1993 FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Charles E. Puckett , Chairman William Mahoney, Joint Chairman James V. Evans Elks Chenevey, Merrill Lynch Don Griffin Mike Stamenson, Merrill Lynch John Gullixson Ed Long, Mudge Rose Iry Pickier Ted Davidson, Robert F. Driver James Wahner John Coan, Paine Webber Grace Winchell Tom Woodruff, General Counsel Evelyn Hart Peer Swan STAFF PRESENT ABSENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance None. Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel Robert J. Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager 1 . 1990-92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND INTEREST RATE MONITORING. The financing team continues to monitor the interest cost and investment earnings of the 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program, Series A, B, and C Certificates of Participation (COP) issues and to provide periodic reports to the Directors. Staff reviewed the enclosed report (pink) which provides the details for the following summary: Total Net True COP Interest Interest Interest Interest ISSUE Paid Earned (Cost) Earninas (Cost) Earninas SERIES A $ 6,882,170 $10,646,049 $3,763,879 . 1.6949% SERIES B 14,650,096 13,919,512 (730,584) ( 0.3563%) SERIES 1,153.189 1 ,606.733 453,544 4,0426% yam/ COMBINED $22.685.455 $26,172,294 $3.486.839 1.6636°h Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee ' Page 2 March 17, 1993 2. ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION 1992 SERIES - SPECIAL COUNSEL FEES. Last year, the Boards selected a financing team for the Districts' recent Refunding Certificates of Participation 1992 Series, consisting of PaineWebber as underwriter and remarketing agent; Mudge Rose and Rourke & Woodruff as co-special counsel; and Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe as underwriter's counsel. The arrangement with Mudge Rose to provide co-bond counsel services required in connection with the advance refunding was in accordance with the terms and conditions of a letter agreement dated June 18, 1992 (copy enclosed). The letter agreement set forth fees for services based on per diem rates, for an amount not to exceed $110,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses. During November, as the transaction was nearing closure, staff was given an oral indication that Mudge Rose was incurring greater than anticipated staff costs due to the complexity of the advance refunding structure and necessary legal documentation and review. The transaction closed December 3, 1992. In two letters (copies enclosed), Mudge has reported that the transaction required a much greater effort than they had anticipated, totaling $280,000. Mr. Ed Long of Mudge Rose attended the meeting and reviewed the reasons for the overrun as explained in his January 7th letter. As stated in their March 11 th letter, Mudge Rose proposed to reduce the total fee for services to $180,000, plus expenses, and they would absorb the balance of $100,000 in an effort to resolve this. The Fiscal Policy Committee deliberated the request of Mudge Rose at considerable length and recommends that the Boards respectfully deny his request for a fee increase, and that payment be made in the amount of the original contract fee of $110,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses. (Note: The legal fees authorized to be paid to Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin for the special bond counsel services related to this transaction totaled $15,000. The actual amount paid was $2,788. There is no request for any adjustment or increase in that amount.) 3. INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT POLICY AND REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS. At the January 27,1993 Executive Committee meeting, Director Swan asked for a review of the Districts' investment policy, now administered solely by the County Treasurer, to determine the desirability of providing staff the flexibility of managing a portion of the Districts' reserve fund investment portfolio. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 3 March 17, 1993 In response to the direction from the Executive Committee, staff and representatives of Merrill Lynch, the Districts' underwriter, reviewed an Investment Management Policy and Reverse Repurchase Agreements Report with the Fiscal Policy Committee in February. In summary, staff and the financial consultant reported that: - Such a program would not be unique and, in fact, is practiced by many agencies in California. - Based on the market history for the past five years, the Districts could expect to realize substantial annual investment earnings from such a program. - The risks associated with such a program are no greater than risks associated with the Districts' existing debt financing and related transactions. - This is a policy decision of the Boards, and if the Directors deem it appropriate to implement such a program, it would be necessary to revise the Boards' existing resolutions, adopt a new investment management policy and guidelines, name a Districts' Treasurer, and make a distinction between that position and the County Treasurer, and open a separate investment account with a bank or other financial institution. It was the consensus of the Fiscal Policy Committee members that implementation of such a program would be worthwhile, and the Committee directed staff, General Counsel and the financial consultant to draft the necessary implementation documents for consideration by the Committee at its March meeting. However, because this would be a significant change to current policy and practice, the Committee also requested that the matter be agendized for a joint meeting with the Executive Committee on February 24th for review and any further direction prior to proceeding. At the February 24, 1993 joint Fiscal and Executive Committee meeting, Districts' staff and representatives of Merrill Lynch gave an oral presentation and answered specific questions. In addition to the information and documents requested by the Fiscal Policy Committee, it was suggested that the Districts' independent accounting firm review the proposal, and that a sample earnings report for the previous 18 months be prepared assuming such a practice had been in place. Staff reported that they had met with the Districts' auditing firm, and discussed the following draft documents with the Orange County Treasurer which were reviewed by the Committee and are enclosed herewith: �✓ A. Resolution Designating a Districts' Treasurer and Authorizing the Districts' Treasurer and the Orange County Tax Collector-Treasurer to Invest and/or Reinvest Districts' Funds (tan); Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 4 March 17, 1993 B. Statement of Investment Policy for Funds Controlled by Districts' Treasurer (yellow); C. Reverse Repurchase Agreement Guidelines/Master Repurchase Agreement (green); D. Sample 18-month Program Earnings Report (pink); E. Districts' Auditor, KPMG, Letter Addressing Accounting Requirements (salmon). The Committee also discussed questions raised by former Joint Chairman A. B. Buck Catlin about changing the Districts' investment policy. His memorandum and the additional information supplied by staff in response to his questions are also enclosed (blue). Staff also reported that the matter had been discussed at great length with the Orange County Treasurer, who indicates support for the reverse repurchase program which is the same practice he utilizes and is largely responsible for his _. ability to realize such an excellent record of investment returns for funds deposited l ' in the County's commingled investment pool. Since implementation of such a �..✓ program contemplates the naming of both a Districts' Treasurer as well as utilization of the County Treasurer's services, Mr. Citron has requested that County counsel clarify whether or not that would impact the duties that the County Treasurer provides on behalf of the Districts. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends that a revised investment policy/reverse repurchase policy be implemented by the following actions, subject to satisfactory resolution of any questions by the Orange County Treasurer pertaining to banking services provided by his office on behalf of the Districts: A. Appoint Merrill Lynch, the Districts' underwriter who also works closely with the County Treasurer's investment program, to serve as the primary dealer of Districts' choice. Merrill Lynch would charge no remuneration on investments, since a spread is already included in the price of the securities. B. Approve the following documents necessary to implement the program: (1) Resolution Designating a Districts' Treasurer and Authorizing the Districts' Treasurer and the Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector to Invest and/or Reinvest Districts' Funds; (2) Statement of Investment Policy for Funds Controlled by Districts' Treasurer; Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 5 March 17, 1993 (3) Reverse Repurchase Agreement Guidelines/Master Repurchase Agreement. C. Authorize staff to proceed with a $50 million investment program and to report to the Directors on investment performance in accordance with adopted policies and guidelines. D. Authorize staff to lease the Bloomberg financial reporting system. (The estimated annual cost is within staff's purchasing authority. The first year's costs, including installation and other one-time costs is expected to be $21 ,000.) 4. STRATEGY FOR FIXED TO FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP 0 993 SWAP). At the January 20, 1993 Fiscal Policy Committee Meeting, staff presented the 1992 Annual Finance Program Report. The Report included a preliminary 1993 program calendar indicating staff and financing team would be returning to the Committee with a proposed strategy for managing a Fixed to Floating-Interest Rate SWAP Program. Both Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber have been working closely with staff on �✓ potential SWAP structures, and both have agreed upon the proposed fixed to floating rate strategy. Estimated earnings under the structures being considered may range from $1-2+ million annually. Both firms have also agreed to proceed with the structuring and with rating agency discussions on a contingency basis, i.e., no fees will be paid unless a SWAP is initiated. The enclosed bound report detailing the proposed SWAP strategy, prepared by staff, Merrill Lynch, and PaineWebber was reviewed by staff for the Committee. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the following actions: A. Authorize staff to proceed with preliminary 1993 SWAP structuring for consideration by the Committee in April, utilizing Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber on a fee contingency basis, subject to final authorization to conduct the transaction by the Boards. B. Direct staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide for special bond counsel services for the 1993 SWAP consideration by the Committee at the next meeting. C. Authorize staff to issue purchase orders to both the Rating Agencies, Standard and Poor's and Moody's, for review of 1993 SWAP structures in �� amounts not to exceed $30,000 each. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 6 March 17, 1993 The financial team will report back to the Fiscal Policy Committee with a proposed structure and contractual arrangements with underwriters and bond counsel for final approval before proceeding with any transaction. 5. ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION. 1993 SERIES I. Staff reported that they and Merrill Lynch have been monitoring recently declining municipal interest rates to determine if it would be advantageous to refund the remaining Series B COPs. The market continues to respond to President Clinton's economic plan and fundamental market and technical forces. The Committee reviewed the enclosed bound report which identifies current potential Series B refunding savings from traditional, inverse floater and synthetic fixed rate advance refunding structures. The report identifies a target 3% level of savings under the most cost-effective structure, for a minimum total savings of approximately $2.5 million. - Staff is also concurrently pursuing the possible refunding of either the Series B 2007 or 2016 term bonds under the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Revolving Fund (SRF loan program). Staff is pursuing with the SWRCB the potential of refunding either term bond using the Interplant Pipeline Project, Job No. 1-9. If the Districts are able to obtain certain SRF program waivers, be approved for refinancing, and have the project placed on the State Water Resources Control Board project priority listing for the IFFY 94, then the Districts could receive a loan with a fixed interest rate of potentially less than 2%. Such loans for refinancing purposes are limited by SRF policy to approximately $20 million. If this SRF option is made available, one of these Series B term bonds could be excluded from this action. Merrill Lynch, the Districts' underwriter for the three 1990-92 Series COP issues, has agreed to proceed with structuring the transaction on a contingency basis. Should an advance refunding be completed, Merrill Lynch will be compensated through the underwriter's spread. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the following actions: A. Authorize staff and the Merrill Lynch to proceed with preliminary steps necessary to structure and bring to market the Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series I, once the target 3% level is achieved. Staff and the Financing Team will report next month to the Fiscal Policy on the recommended advance refunding structure and potential savings. B. Direct staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide special bond counsel for Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series I, for consideration by the Committee at the next meeting. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 7 March 17, 1993 The financial team will report back to the Fiscal Policy Committee with a proposed structure and contractual arrangements with underwriters and bond counsel for final approval before proceeding with any transaction. 6. COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION MASTER PROGRAM. At the November 1992 Fiscal Policy Committee meeting, Districts' staff and insurance broker, Robert F. Driver Co., presented a new program concept pertaining to insuring construction projects for consideration by the Fiscal Policy Committee. The proposed course of construction master insurance program was reviewed by the Districts' Risk Management Task Force and submitted to the Fiscal Policy Committee for review and approval. A course of construction policy provides normal "all-risk" property insurance on all facilities under construction until completion and acceptance, in place of the coverage currently required of construction contractors on an individual project basis. The November report recommended that the Districts take control of course of construction policy coverage on upcoming new construction projects and identified two implementation options. It will enable the Districts to control coverage, achieve consistency of coverage and realize insurance cost savings on construction �...� contracts. The Fiscal Policy Committee directed Robert F. Driver to solicit proposals for course of construction coverage, and to require the contractor to be responsible for a reasonable deductible for each loss. The Committee recommended that the program be implemented for at least one year with staff reporting semiannually on program results. The enclosed bound report which presents the results of the Master Course of Construction marketing including coverage, terms and premium comparison for all proposals and the Summary of Contractors' Insurance Bids for P2-42-2 (white) were reviewed for the Committee by staff and Robert F. Driver. The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the following actions: A. Direct staff and Robert F. Driver to implement the Master Course of Construction Program and to report to the Committee semiannually with program results. B. Select Zurich Insurance Company as the insurance carrier for the Master Course of Construction Program for a premium rate of $.125 per year per $100 of construction project bid, an estimated annual premium not to exceed `� $125,625, in accordance with the terms of the enclosed report. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 8 March 17, 1993 7. SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL PLAN REPORT. During a recent review of the Self-Funded Health Plan budget and costs, the Committee asked staff for additional information. The Directors expressed concern over the rate of expenditures compared to the budget and what cost containment practices were in effect. The Committee and staff reviewed the enclosed (gray) staff report, which presents an overview of the plan and cost containment measures in effect. JWS:lc REF.RFK3.17 Enclosures COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 41 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 EILBAVENUE P.O.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272B41127 March 10, 1993 014)962-2411 STAFF REPORT 1990-1992 Capital Improvement Program Certificates of Particiostion Monitoring The Districts' financing team continues to monitor the interest cost and investment interest earnings of the 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program COP issues. The enclosed schedules show the net interest earnings to date of the Series A and C variable rate COP issues, and the reduced interest cost of the Series B fixed rate COP issue. SERIES A. B AND C NET INTEREST COST SUMMARY The Estimated Series A Net Debt Service to Date schedule (blue) indicates that while the variable daily interest rate paid by the Districts since December 1990 has ranged from 1 .00% to 9.75%, the average has been 3.088%. Overall interest earnings on the Series A proceeds, including the reimbursement amount for 1989-90 L improvements on deposit with the Orange County Treasurer, continue to exceed interest costs, resulting in a net positive cash flow. The Estimated Series B Net Debt Service to Date schedule (gold) displays the net interest cost of the fixed rate issue. There are three types of investment earnings on this transaction: Interest earned on unspent proceeds deposited with the Trustee or the County, interest earnings on the ten-year Guaranteed Investment Contract (GIC) for the debt service reserve fund, and net SWAP earnings. The total SWAP reversal earnings have been shown as a single deposit on November 5, 1992 and, therefore, depict an elevated one-time earnings for Series B. The Estimated Series C Net Debt Service to Date Schedule (white) indicates that the average variable daily interest rate paid by the Districts since September 1, 1992, has been 2.342%. Overall interest earnings on Series C proceeds, including the reimbursement amount on deposit with the Orange County Treasurer, as well as earnings on proceeds invested by the Franklin and Fidelity funds, exceed interest costs, resulting in a net positive cash flow. 1990-92 COP Monitoring ' Page 2 March 10, 1993 `/ The pertinent interest cost, investment earnings and resulting all-in true interest cost (TIC) figures for each issue and for all issues combined through March 8, 1993 are summarized below: COP Total Net True Interest Interest Interest Interest Paid Earned (Cost) Earnings (Cost) Earninas SERIES A $ 6,882,170 $10,646,049 $3,763,879 1.6949% SERIES B 14,650,096 13,919,512 (730,584) (0.3563%) SERIES 1,153,189 1,606.733 453.544 4.0426% COMBINED $22.685,455 $26,172,294 $3 486 83 1.66360& PG:Ic RERCAS3 PC3.17 V h1F.RR0.1.L1� CO. 6IM91 � \ -. cowry swwiw Dic0im a o�c%e6T C"-W wl aFenidwiw lag Se,-A lPecpvn 199O925ecwA FS M)SK AN DMTSM"CETODATO A B c D K F O B 1 I K L M Li1nN Co}4 k1YfWeLnl Fiednu Feimwowwemy I F,oae.31eea.dMTlutlee 91o:ee.a.mea.Bllcol.6y TaW d% fRinciMl field PerieAv UWnl T9 AR Fedcdic Mit w,ccwmt AM FMadic 61Eu (I16Cow Aw Ouuwdin6 Yield Deb 9erviee WTlupw Yield Faniliy Aml.r/Cowry Yield F F ilp MFimicyc 11C I -- I19590-MINI fIW.OWAW 3.155% NN.9W.W NATBOW m TJW% M68,335.W 319,880.MW /600): fW9.81033 60ZM 21 fb9.IW.3l (IA13325%) OININI-ONIN1 IWWO.WO ).155% 3619W.W I 3O0M.W0.W 6930% 191.53/N <9.880.00000 8.89055 W�27.0 601W631 339,IW 14 (3.15MM ) ON)1N1-ON/91 IWOW.OW 3.616% 3M.W/.N I1O33.O D0d 636 116.241% <9,880.000.00 BBMS ]68,69 W SA.9N33 ISAW S (AIS ) O,01L91-ONI91 IWWOWO 3.71mIWN )W.55933 I 33,ON000OO 631M 11633156 <9,8W.M.00 961m 3N,10000 SWI5156 14O66119 (1.74 d 06Oimi-O 1,501 10000O.W0 3.16M 3W.538.3I 110%.omw 610M 66JT1.91 e9.880.000A0 1.61M 353.BA.W 535JW.N 15130119 (I.1T71%) OIN191-ONI91 IWWOWO 3.619% WL6166T 1 1.001AWOO S.W93% A,1/1.9I NAWWOW ISSM 331=33 3XII3.N 9I.61T95 (O M5T1%) O A)INI-0N3091 IWOWW0 1%9i MOAI66T I 1.01T,WOm 5.9 WA IA/51.N 39,3WOWW 6310% N1J6133 156.113.33 35.696/5 (0.mm) WNINI-W91N1 IWW9W0 3.366% 39T,ITS.W 1 OW WA OW 59,BWWO.W 611M 337.100 IITJ31l) SO.N6M (0.59055M) 040191-ONI91 IW,OWOW 3AA% 3N./d66T 1 O.W WA am 39.8WOWW 8.lM 3A,IWT 11T,105.33 113W.W (0158810%) 09A191-IW.KWI IWWOWO 3.BM% SOSAI6ID 1 0.W WA 0.W N.380,WO.W IAM 333,03.11 3515M.D (539IIJ)) O&31TM 1PV191-1l' l IWWO.W0 3.92MISM 331.N1.W 1 OW WA am e9,880,000W B.IW% )1T9lTW 333.91T.W 10.M163 losol M) 1191N1-INd91 IWOWOW 3.560% 3 1?R.31 1 000 WA OW 59.8W.OWW I.IW% 33T91T.W 333,9AW (7.016) (O()MOm) I3N191-INI91 IWOWWO AI33% IKTN.1) OW WA OW e9,880,000W 9.IIM 3KSMW 3IT.SM.6T (T.116O O09W36% 01N193-019193 IW.0W.0W 1069% 131313.M 1 O.W WA O.W 59.880.OW.W 9.3W% 3WIM33 )KIN..W )11,135.% 2QW16%i) WNN3-O"Im IWOWWO 1.9/M IM,M.A I OW WA OW 59,/80.WO.W 9190% 1M,IN.13 N6.INJ3 13031198 2vmloii O3XI192-ON193 IWW0600 1M6% Ad,M3.M I OW WA O.W 59.880.0W.W 93C0% 39)SXW WIMP IN.3M58 (IAT915%) MIM-O IM IM000,OW ).66M WSJSS.N 1 am WA 0W 59.990.OWW 9.15m 186330.W )8(13WW 15,0M65 0).9M03M) OSO193-ON193 IWWOOW 1.1/M 1MJII5/ 1 OW WA OW 59.880. W.W 9150% 3WJ)1W MO3IS.W 115,OI1.33 (1.A W 06UIM-O alm lmooli UOO 1.86M 15"58.33 I O.W WA O.W 39.890.0W.W 90M: 3AAW.6) 3rWV 331,531.)) 2d9355M) W9193-W919I IWW9W0 IA10% IW,80651 1 0.W WA OW 59,880,W9W 905(N 375.MW 33611/J) ASJ31M 2U131m) O lm-ON193 IWWaW0 119M IM,IM.93 OW WA am 59,88QOW.W 9.0M5 37015.67 331A1M 191563.A 2NI119%) O➢N193-09/ im IWWQWO 3880% 35OW0.W O.W WA OW 59889WO.W 9.010% AIJI5.63 3N.515.6T 1NJI)6T (1615513%) 10N193-1O'I193 1W.Wa O 1310% 174.1WO am WA OW 39.e8O000.W /880% 3T1.111W M.dWW 1WA9.33 (11M)"d 11N193-TWIM IWWO.OW 10➢M M0133 O.W WA O.W 59,88O.W6W 6M0% W"1.33 N➢WI33 IN,953.W 2)T03T6%) 1N0193-01 5193 IWWO.WO 3,IN% 3W,M133 O.W WA OW 59.8W.WOW LIM{ 3W.591.I3 339.M,67 111011W (I.38931W8) 01919)-ONNI IWOW.OW IAA% 116.SM.N I am WA O.W 39.880.WOW I.IM3 331.351T 339.35167 IM,01633 231S13M) 039193-ON49J IW.WO,OW NSM 194CM.M I O.W WA OW 59,MO,WOW 8.150% 3IIJ326/ )N.J326T 153J6911 (1.139109A) I I I IWM 16M1169.M I 655M A24,7I615 1. M B.AIJN.K 81016049.14 M,36187938 (169951%) MERRILL L NCN&CO. 03/0893 117,555,000 n County Sanitation Districts ofOmngc County CON-Capi W Improvcmcnt Program 1990-92 Series B ESTIMATED SERIES B NET DEBT SERVICE TO DATE A B C D E F O H I 3 Interest Cost Investment Earnings Principal OUL+tanding Proceeds Invested with Tmstx Proceeds Invnted with County I Principal Fixed Periodic Debt Unspent Proceeds Avg. Periodic Reimbursement Avg. Periodic Outstanding Retc Smice w/Trust" Yield Esmings Amt.w/County Yield Earnings I 05/07/91 - O"IMI EI 17 55,000 6.860% 537 IS20 5 b I E90,185,195.00 5.892e/. 363,952.86 E12368,000.00 8.540% 72341.33 0610191 - 0613091 117,555,000 6,860% 672,022.75 I 90,185,195.00 5.910% 438,077.67 12368,000.00 8.210% 83,459.59 07/0I91 - 07/3191 117,555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 98,427,937.00 5.910% 443,859.79 12,36SX0,00 S.120% 85,293.15 09/0191 - 0E/319I 117,555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 83,655277.00 5.780% 410,667.19 123689M.00 8.110% 85,190.11 09/0191 - 095091 117,555,000 6.960% 672,022.75 76,674,244.00 5.620% 354,171.99 12,369,000.00 8AW1.. 86,20327 IOro191 - 10/31/91 117,55SAW 6.860% 672,022.75 I 70.614y19.00 5382% 322,778.70 12,368,000.00 8.130-A 85,400.19 IIA0191 - 115091 117,555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 65,953.754.00 5.005% 270,902.50 12368,000.00 8.130'R 92,645.35 12/0191 - 1213191 117,555,000 6.960% 672,02,235 I 55,611AM.00 4.793% 226392.72 12368,000.00 8.110% 85,190.11 OIN192 - 01/3192 117,555AW 6.860% 672=.75 I 53AS0375.00 4.793% 215,955.72 12368,000.00 9300Y. 97,690.26 02/0192 - 02r2992 117,555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 46AS3,795.00 4.264% ISSR55.39 12368,000.00 9190$A 91}89.39 0310192 - 03/3192 117,555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 37.880240.00 4.223% t35,863A5 12368,000.00 9A60% 99370.95 04/0192 - 04/30/92 117,555,000 6.960% 672,022.75 I 33.696,598.00 4.08gY. 113,220.54 12368,000.00 9.300% 94538.96 05/0192 - 05/3192 117555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 27,472,263.00 3.968% 92583.78 1230,000.00 9.150% 96,114.61 06/0192 - 06/3092 117,355,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 9,071,269.00 3.894% 28,95SA7 12368,000.00 9.070% 92,200.90 07/0192 - 07/3I92 117555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 7,129,713.00 3.530% 21372.47 12368,00000 9.050% 95,064.19 08/0192 - O&131192 117,555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 5,692346.00 3A22% 16,543.99 12368,000.00 9.040% 94959.13 0910192 - 09/3092 117555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 4,827,958.00 3.162% 12,547.40 12368,000.00 9.010% 91,590.97 10/0192 - 10/31/92 117,555,000 6.860Y. 672,022.75 I 4,479,415.00 3.170% 12,060.06 12368,OU0.00 8.940% 93,908.70 1110192 - 118092 117555,000 6.860Y. 672,022.75 I 3,924552.00 3.022% 9,74923 12368,000.00 SAWK 90369A6 12/0192 - 1213192 117555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 1,713375,00 3.153% 4588.42 1236SAW.00 SA20% $8,446.45 01/0193 - OI/3193 117,555,000 6160% 672,022.75 I 1586,651.44 3.119% 4,201.45 1236SAM.00 8.170% 85,920.37 0210193 - 022893 117,555,000 6.8wA 672,022.75 I 1369,446.05 3.048% 3,201.78 12368,000.00 8.140% 77,230.54 I I E14,650,095.95 I 4.324% f3,659,695.56 8.684% E1,954,221.94 WRRILL LM sCO. 03N893 117,555,ON o Courtly Sniblim Din ofg pCw ly CON-Capital Imp9wallmd Pw 1990.925cnwB ESTIMATED SERIES B NET DEBT SERVICE TO DATE-Pap 2 K L M N O P Q R S T Inrmmwl Emn'nw GIC Emllinp Swap Emllinp TMI Nd 1.wl Avg R.Fm Flalny Find Nc1 R.1 InwY (Il6 COMP NI-U Fml6 Yrcld In GIC la Paid OB. d Em N rfl Emninp IIO Emninp TIC 05I)7/B- 03ON91 $9.513,625.0 8.010% 51919.54 U89,216J2 (568.401.68) 0.51932% (WI)IN1- 06 "I 9,513,625.00 8.010% 63,503.45 8610,3"..61 (N10,5T9.61) 174.4 0.10 (69'L56165) 5.33155% OTNIMI- OTGI91 9913,625.N 8.010% 65,6M.0 356."LM (3%Q591.20) D8,183.9T (/33,838.18) 4.65413% OMIN1- 08G191 9,513,625.00 8.010% 65,6M.23 601."9.72 (60LN8.72) IN,028.81 (511,993.N) 5.69339% MMIAH - 09G091 9,513,625.00 8.010% 63,303.45 QZ916.23 (63;916.n) T0,%145 (NI,ON.30) 6.6d902% MINI - 10A191 9,513,625.00 Ilkim 65,620.0 6U,9U.96 (60,913.99) M,6113.16 (N;139.61) 6.18"M I INIBI - Ila"] 9,513,625.N 8.010% 63,503.45 M(W1.59 3,IN,NB.N ;T15.W01 3,132,O55M ;6N,03155 (M.3%70%) Mimi - IMIM 9,513,625.111) 8.010% 65,6211.23 372-M33 (372,279.33) 4.913.73 (66T,109.02) 7.15769% OINIB2- OV3192 9,513.625. 0 8.010% 65.6"M 619,151.N (119.151.N) (39,88613) (711,90T.58) 7.63935% OWDIM- 021M92 9,513,625.N 8.010% 61,386.67 256J5266 (234.352,M) 56a78.T9 (615,N3.%) 6.60S50% 03N193- 035IM 9,313,625.N 8.010% 65,6M.M 2M.M.18 (2 ,STT.Iq 74,2TIA5 (597,745.30) 6A1365% NN192- OUM 9,513,625.N 8410% 63.M3.45 293,TM.T9 (M5,726.79) (24d6J.85) (696,486.N) 7.67289% MIM- 0551N2 9,513,625.N 8.010% 65,620.0 331.333.61 3,109,N8.60 2,TTT,71199 3,N2,031.61 2,3051),N8.86 (25.32130%) MIM- 003M 9,513,623.00 SBIM 63,M3.I5 322,677.09 (3216T3.09) (138,016.27) (810,037.N) 8.69122% 0761192- MIM 9,513,625.111) BDI636 65,6".13 D2.35137 (232.352-37) (50,293.30) (722,318.23) 7.7M5% OS0192- OBO192 9,513,625.N 8.010% 65.6M.13 203,IN.10 (20.109.10) (25,NS.73) (6N,N8.30) 7.68922% O9NIM- MM 9,513,625.N 8.010% 63,503.45 234.998.50 (236,888.50) (67,29.68) (739,269A3) 7.010% IMIM- I"Im 9,513,625.00 9.010% 65,6".M 284.634.33 (2U.636.33) (I D.U5.34) (mftilo9) BAU32% 11N192- 11/3092 9,513,625.N 8.010% 63,503.45 M.393.03 3,039.979.18 2,U5,585.15 31661N9.N 6,66;056.29 S,TN,033.54 (6112365%) IMIM- IMIM 9,513,625.00 8.010% 65,6M.0 IS8,655.10 (513X7.65) S.SN13% OINIAa- OWIN3 9,513,623.00 8.010% 124,8N.11 214,911.93 (437.110.84 6.90453% 02AIIN3- Nf18lU 9,513,625.00 8.010% BO,43131 (591,5NA6) 6.36762% 8.010% S1,405,562.% 35.M.013.38 $9.252.115.38 S3.437,101N U,66;N9.N S13919,511.16 (3730,58,1.69) 03563015% MERRISYNCH&CO. 0NOW3 9s.saoaoo Conoty SeniMion Districts ofO.%.County COPS—Capital Improvemad Program 1990-92 Series C ESTIMATED SERIES C NE f DEBT SERVICE TO DATE A B C D E F O H 1 3 Intmest Coate Investment Eaminae Pmieipd Oatatmding Pmceeds Inverted with Franklin Proceeds Invested with Fidelity Pai.ipd Avg. Periodic Debt I Unspent Proceed. Avg. Periodic Umper8 Proceeds Avg. Periodic Outstanding Yield Service w/Tmstee Yield Earnings w/Tm.t. Yield Eemings I I 09Po192-09/3092 598,500,000 2.883% 5236,673.61 I E38,440,590.70 5.500% E173.772.53 E35,361,487.19 3.162% E91,945.07 10101/92-10/3192 98.500,000 2.410% 197,794.32 I 35,440,590.70 -2.730% (39,129.51) 32,875,072.11 3.170'.b 89,499.70 11/0192-11/3092 98,500,000 2.090% 171,554.17 37,284,233.36 2.300vh 70,492.52 29.724.927.62 3.022% 73.831.93 1210192-12/3192 98,500,000 2A34% 199,790.93 I 37,284,233.36 3.600% 110,320A7 23,227,145.05 3.153% 60,193.31 0110193-0113193 98,500,000 1.979% 154aM.58 I 37,284,233.36 4.530% 148,074.59 20,650,797.91 3.118% 56.447.29 0210193-02128/93 98,500,000 2.353% 193,142.08 I 37,294,233.36 6.290% 179,904.09 18,299,418.74 3.049% 42.794.21 I 2.342% SI,I53,169.60 I 3.248% E593,424.69 7.112% 5413,701.39 MERRIL(-.4CH k CO. 0341893 598,500,000 n County Sanitatim Districts ofOsmge County COPS—Capita Imptovement Pmpnm 1990-92 Series C ESTIMATED SERIES C NET DEBT SERVICE TO DATE—PAGE 2 K L M N O P Q R S Inmeenno tFeminm Proceeds Invested with County Reserve Fund Eamings Told Net Reimbursement Avg. Periodic Invested Avg. Reserve Food Inveement (Int CostY All-In Aunt w/County Yield Eamings Funds Yield Fidelity Esmings hot Eamiop TIC 09d1192—MO92 SIO,499,745.65 9.010% $77.755.63 $9.950,000.00 3.162% $25,396.97 5369,070.22 $132,396,61 (7.08069%) 10/0192-10131192 10,499,745.65 8.940% 79,72317 9,950,000.00 3.170% 26,316.20 105,609.66 (92,184.66) 4.93012% 11/0192-113092 10,499,745.65 8.880% 76,633.76 9,850,000.00 3.022% 24,465.79 245.413.90 73,859.73 (3.95008%) 129192-123192 10,499,745.65 9.420% 72,663.99 9,930,000.OD 3.133% 25,526.34 268,704.11 69,91328 (3.68534%) 01101193-013193 10,499,745.65 8.170% 75.206.95 9,850,000.00 3.119% 26,924.18 306.652.99 152,41&41 (8.15147%) 0210193-02/2893 10,499,745.65 9.140% 65.364.44 9,950,000.00 3.048% 23,029.39 311,292.13 118,140.04 (6.31823%) 8.593% 5447,548.06 3.125% $152,058.86 111,606,733.01 5453,543.41 (4.04265%) MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER S FEROON 1..N.m[ry urv[ 21 eT FLOOR s einev:x.w. vew I......w ronx lome-a.e wAaxlxOrorv.o.c.z0.., lee. z 1ae to,... 333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE ........ease `� ea0 nr vzNO[ LOS ANG E LES, CALI FORN IA 90071-1525 e0n[voo.xonwsuoa[c[xrRs awr[l..0 213-613-1 11 2 su.o.T.rumen only[ ..w ronx,N.1. .01 n.1..[.C..IL.avoroa+ [Ia-v[-1e00 +o Pee0.8100 .ca1x u: NO....coano..rz AD L. ,0 12.zu-.vo-use 00., o[u.AIx ax[wnw no«o Ro.o eioo.o ,soo[.R.R1s.rRAxc[ RAne1RR.«r,«[w�uea o,oe+ 1o>a u1 z.e1.m. .1 ao1-ease..+ ro RArvoRON3-«on1[uu01«a e-1 ronwo«o«a-cxoN[.xw.m-xu EOWARO W. LONG TOKYO 109..MAN epRT... mal WRIT[R'0 oI.Ml....[. (213)229-2301 (Voicemail) January 7, 1993 Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca Financial Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Dear Ms. Gorczyca: District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 recently closed a very successful refunding transaction, the $160, 600, 000 Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series (the "Refunding COPS") . The Refunding COPS produced for the Districts savings in excess of $7,700,000. Mudge Rose served as co-bond counsel in the Refunding COPS financing. In that regard, I provide herewith a copy of our services contract, dated June 18, 1992 (the "Services Contract") . Rourke & Woodruff also served as co-bond counsel. The Refunding COPS financing was a ''synthetic fixed" structure and, accordingly, the Services Contract provided for payment of Mudge Rose time charges up to $110,000. Substantial work on the financing began at the end of June; the financing closed on December 3, 1992. Work to complete the file continued through December. Accordingly, services were rendered for six months in bringing the financing to completion. Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca January 7, 1993 Page 2 During this six month period, Mudge Rose rendered services to the Districts which resulted in $261,770 of time charges. Attached hereto are graphic depictions of the accrual of the services charges over the six-month period, both on a month-by-month and cumulative basis. We have not yet billed the Districts for the services rendered. We are writing to you at this time to seek the necessary authorization from the Districts' staff, Fiscal Policy Committee and Boards to bill all or substantially all of our time charges. We do not make this request lightly, but we believe we are justified in doing so. In this regard, we point out the following for your consideration: Unanticipated Changes in Circumstances When the Services Contract was presented to the Districts in June, the Districts and we each anticipated certain matters. In fact, several significant matters turned out not to be as anticipated. As examples, Anticipated Matter Actual Occurrence The financing would progress In fact, the financing in a prompt manner, as had (through no fault of the past financings for the Districts or Mudge Rose) took Districts. Ninety to 120 days six months to complete. This would have been expected. resulted in uncontemplated additional effort by Mudge Rose. The financing would involve In fact, District Nos. 5, 6, 7 only Districts 1, 2 and 3 . and 11 were added to the financing. This addition resulted in uncontemplated additional effort by Mudge Rose. Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca January 7, 1993 Page 3 Anticipated Matter Actual Occurrence AIG-FP, the counterparty on In fact, the documents the swap underlying the presented by AIG-FP were quite transaction, was prepared to different, from a business and enter into the same legal point of view, from transaction with the Districts those used in the SCPPA as it had with SCPPA, with financing. Mudge Rose substantially the same terms, analyzed the differences for documents and bank and the Districts, and assisted at insurer, with only minor length in negotiating and differences. The SCPPA adjusting the documents to transaction, in which Mudge provide a better deal for the Rose served as bond counsel Districts. As a result of and which was the first these efforts, the Districts financing of this type, received the best deal from provided to SCPPA the most AIG-FP since the SCPPA favorable terms of any of such transaction. These efforts, transactions. however, resulted in uncontemplated additional work by Mudge Rose. In fact, the documents presented by the bank started out like the SCPPA standby agreement. However, the bank (not Mudge Rose or the Districts) changed the approach, to be a letter of credit. After substantial negotiation by Districts staff and Mudge Rose, we produced a letter of credit agreement better than the originally presented standby agreement. As you know, we were required to go back to the Hoards for approval of this new approach. This resulted in uncontemplated additional effort by Mudge Rose. Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca January 7, 1993 Page 4 Anticipated Matter Actual Occurrence In fact, the insurer also presented different document provisions, including those seeking to preclude the Districts from terminating the swap. As you know, the ability to terminate the swap was a very basic premise of the Districts undertaking the transaction; it was discussed and agreed to at the very first meeting with AIG-FP. Mudge Rose and the Districts staff aggressively negotiated, and Mudge Rose prepared, the provisions which allowed the Districts the needed termination rights. This resulted in uncontemplated additional effort by Mudge Rose. National Westminster and FGIC In fact, FGIC did consent would promptly render the without significant necessary consents, without negotiation. National significant negotiation. Westminster, however, required the negotiation and preparation of an amendment to the underlying documents for their financing. As you know, Districts 13 and 14 are required to take additional action in this regard. Beneficial Service to the Districts The Mudge Rose effort in this financing was strong, responsive and of very significant assistance to the Districts, from both a legal and a business point of view. (1) Mudge Rose identified business points, and worked constantly with Districts staff to negotiate the best results for the Districts. Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca January 7, 1993 Page 5 (2) Mudge Rose and Districts staff succeeded in negotiating terms for the financing which make the financing demonstrably better for the Districts than similar financings done for other borrowers. We know that you, as part of your diligence, have documented a number of these successes. (3) Mudge Rose worked tirelessly toward the success of the financing. Our people worked long into the night many nights, and worked over a number of weekends, to secure the success of the financing. In November alone, our people including Carolyn Clark and Leeanna Izuel (who were responsible for the letter of credit and insurance related documents, and the principal financing documents) , Sam Poss (who was responsible for the swap and liquidity guaranty and related documents) and Brant Freer (who was responsible for the Federal tax exemption matters) , put in 595 hours. Carolyn and Leeanna each put in over 180 hours that month. All told, we put in over 1,250 hours to accomplish the financing. Services contract Authority The Services Contract provides, after establishing the $110, 000 cap, that "The cap applies to ordinary services in the contemplated financing, and does not apply to charges for additional services required due to circumstances beyond the control of Mudge Rose such as substantial changes in the structure of the contemplated financing, material time delays, or adverse litigation or legislation. We will notify the Districts before expending any substantial time in providing any such additional services. " In this regard, we note that (a) The greatly increased level of services was beyond the ordinary, was due to circumstances beyond the control of Mudge Rose, and resulted very substantially from changes from the contemplated structure and from material time delays. (b) Clearly the level of services required to complete the financing was significantly greater than the $110,000 Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca January 7, 1993 Page 6 contemplated in the Services Contract in June, as over $117, 000 of services were required in November alone. (c) We notified Districts staff, in early November, that significant additional services were required to complete the assignment to the satisfaction of the Districts. At that time, Districts staff advised us that (i) Districts staff had authority from the Boards at that time to pay Mudge Rose compensation for services up to $110,000, (ii) any additional compensation for Mudge Rose services would have to be approved by the Boards, with direction from the Fiscal Policy Committee, and (iii) the Districts desired for us to continue the level of services needed to complete the financing, and to submit the compensation issue to the Boards once the work was complete and the time expended was known. (d) At all times in our dealings with the Districts and Districts staff, we have been treated professionally, `— honestly and fairly, and we have had no reason to believe that the matter of additional compensation would be treated in any other fashion. I appreciate your cooperation in this regard. If you, the Fiscal Policy Committee or the Boards wish us to provide additional information, please do not hesitate to let me know. Sincerely, Edward W. L EWL:mdt v MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER S, FERDON uo.Auo.N uNa 21 Sr FLOOR Nzw.own,icw To•x ooaa •eae wsaxo+ox.o.c.aoavan a i esi o >oo0 333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE +oa •:sSass `/ uo n• vcxuc LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90071-I52S ....... ccxac Sw+c�sso 21 3-61 3-11 1 2 sn no•rN ruoLc•S•wc xaw roan.N.+. mi �.oiu wcST PALM CACN.rL.33w1.A334 a y.aaa. soo NO,.00...GO xo•nS CmvO•Arc CCNTw+wo •.c aiM M1C ONa u••c•roxo•o•o noo.o z a-aeo see t.we oc u•A.. >ataa.•A•.S.AANCC eA11a V•AMp M FRJ OIIS CTo>aS)-IO>e a •h er V T aa�-a]SCOO• ro•ANoxoN a> No•,exiLoiNo a-i +a lrwxeNON a.CN ON c.NiNATo nV LOW MAN W. aoeo +oxvo me.,.•AN •An+xu Qom a•a>zeei w•ocrS o+sa+N�.ec• (213) 229-2301 (Voicemul) March 11, 1993 Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca Financial Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Dear Ms. Gorczyca: I refer you to my January 7, 1993 letter, concerning additional billing with respect to the Districts' Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series financing. The reasons and bases for the additional billing are spelled out in that letter. I have also had extensive discussions with the Districts' Staff (in particular you and Messrs. Sylvester and Streed) concerning the reasons and bases for the additional billing. This letter confirms that, as a result of those discussions, I have proposed that the additional billing be $70, 000. This would result in a total service charge billing of $180, 000 (the June 1992 contract amount of $110, 000, plus the additional $70, 000) . This letter also confirms that I have advised you that the total amount of our booked (vs. billed) service charges with respect to the financing is approximately $280, 000. Accordingly, the proposed adjustment would result in a write-off by Mudge Rose of approximately $100, 000 of service charges. If you have any questions with respect hereto, please do not hesitate to call me . Sincerely, Edward W. Zong EWL:sb MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER & FERDON .uo[x ux[ SUITE 2020 +m...w. .[w.own.xew♦own ioov w x� crow.ec.]wa> _ u.000 333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE a . ..ea [a ]— LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 uc>nx wcw�a awn wo.xo+ ...... c[x.wc wm�... 213-613-1 1 12 ms xoww ruV.q owrv[ may-uoo .o>.uoum ,. —LC: .o++a cowrow.rc cwi[w.wo z a aeo u]e z.w[oe u.aw A.e.00.o .ews r..♦..v n....once. ^• . . zoi »none. ♦ .ex . w».eu m..... ] i0u • v . nxtlO.nV ♦ .O'O[.o.n.0 0l1)OiIO� wq♦O a Ou[O xVna[+ (213) 229-2301 June 18, 1992 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018 Attention: Mr. Gary Streed Ladies and Gentlemen: At the request of Patricia Gorczyca of the Districts' Staff, we submit the following proposed arrangement for our services and compensation in connection with the proposed advance refunding of the outstanding 1986 Certificates of Participation of District Nos. 1, 2 and 3 (now projected for late 1992 (the "Refunding Financing") . The arrangement proposed herein is separate from the Districts' services agreements with Rourke i Woodruff. The Rourke 8 Woodruff services and compensation related to the financing program are to be as provided for under such agreements. If the Districts' accept this proposal, this letter will constitute the agreement between the Districts and Mudge Rome with respect to the matters covered hereby. Services to be Provided Different financing structures require bond counsel to prepare and review distinct documents and legal issues. Without _ detailing the specifics of the different structures being considered, we will provide the following services to the Districts in connection with the Refunding Financing: • assist the Districts ' in the review of financing structures proposed, and the selection of the actual structure to be used in the Refunding Financing; and • advise the Districts concerning the relationship of the Districts' outstanding borrowings to the proposed Refunding Financing structure; and • prepare or participate in the preparation of all documents, review all legal issues and render advice with respect to the structure selected by the Districts for the Refunding Financing. Such documents would include, as needed, ordinances, resolutions, acquisition agreements, installment purchase agreements, interest rate swap agreements, trust agreements, purchase contracts, letters of credit, liquidity agreements, - reimbursement agreements, resolutions, offering documents, legal opinions and closing papers. Individuals to Provide Services All services hereunder would be provided by personnel located in our Los Angeles office (although, if needed, the resources of our other offices will be available) . Edward Long (Partner, Finance) and Brant Freer (Partner, Tax) will direct and be responsible for the Mudge Rose services to the Districts. Other attorneys located in the Loa Angeles Office will assist in providing the Mudge Rose services. Charoes We propose that, in general, we be compensated for our services on the basis of our normal billing rates for the .services provided. Based on that general approach, we propose that: Services Our service charges with respect to the Rafunding Financinq will be subject to a cap (set forth below) , which will limit the amount which we may charge the Districts for such services. The cap applies to ordinary services in the contemplated financing, and does not apply to charges for additional services required due to circumstances beyond the +scV0V\9eev\os000sanoo 2 control of Mudge Rose such as substantial changes in the structure of the contemplated financing, material time delays, or adverse litigation or legislation. We will notify the Districts before expending any substantial time in providing any such additional services. The Districts are considering at this time two different Certificates of Participation structures for the Refunding Financing: (a) a regular fixed rate refunding (the Regular Structure-) ; and (b) a synthetic fixed rate structure, using variable rate obligations, insurance, liquidity and a long- term interest rate swap (the "synthetic Fixed Structure-) . The number of hours of services required for Mudge Rose to complete the Refunding Financing will vary depending upon which of the structures is utilized. We agree that the following cap amounts will apply to the Refunding Financing: (a) if the Regular Structure is utilized, a cap of $80, 000; (b) if the Synthetic Fixed Structure is utilized, a cap of $110,000. We would forego billing for services with respect to the Refunding Financing until the closing or until the financing is abandoned. Expenses Separately, we would be reimbursed for costs and charges incurred in rendering services to the Districts. Reimbursement would cover reproduction costs; telephone and telecopier charges; word processing charges; messenger, delivery and mail services; printing costs; preparation and binding of transcripts, if any; and travel and transportation costs; and similar charges and costs. We would bill for such charges and costs at the time of billing for the related services. ��c\+mr\rr�u\caooacooe 3 Termination This agreement may be terminated by either party at any time, without cause. In such event, the Districts agree to pay for `. all services rendered and related costs and charges incurred up to the time of notification of termination. -------------------------------- we thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. If we may provide additional information, please do not hesitate to call upon me. If this proposal is acceptable to the Districts, please indicate your acceptance by returning to us a copy of this letter dated and signed by an authorized official of the Districts. Very truly yours, MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER & FERDON By L-�GJ Edward ong cc: Thomas Woodruff, Esq. ACCEPTED this Bth day of July , 1992: COUNTY rSTAT D STRI CT S OF Oy IA BTGralima6ker a Official is C\10O\MLL6\Ce00c1=o0c 4 CSDOC --REFUNDING COPS Mudge Rose Cumulative Effort 300 250 _ ......... ......... ... ...................... ......_ .. N 200 ... . . . ........ 0 o � o � 1 5 0 ... .................. ......... 4 O U � m 100 ....... 50 0 Jul-92 Sep-92 Nov-92 Aug-92 Oct-92 Dec-92 CSDOC —REFUNDING COPS Mudge Rose Monthly Effort 120 - 100 - ........... ............. 80 - ........... 0 0 '0 6D - ......................... ............. d) 0 40 - ........... ........ ................................ (A 20 - .......... D 7 Jul-92 Sep-9 2 Nov-9 2 Aug-9 2 Dct-92 Dec-9 2 COMPARISON OF BOND COUNSEL FEES COMPARABLE BTNTHETIC FI%ED RAZE TRANSACTIONS ISSUER PAR AMOUNT FEE TIME FRAME HOURS FIRM STRUCTURE FEE ARRANGEMENT San Diego County Regional 4141,600,000 /2001000 8/92-10/14192 BOB Ordck Similar to CSOOC Straight Hourly Agmament Transportation Commission No Maximum Scuthem California Aeaoo. 4293,000,000 $300,000 12/9O4/17/91 1,871.2 Mudge Rove Fina Ever Tremaction Total Foe of Public Power Authadtiee Negotiated a End New Jerery Sport.and $209,990,000 6200,000 2/92-11192 Flat Fes Mudge Rwe Similar to CSDOC Total Fee ExpaeWon Authority No Hour. Negotiated at End Loa Angalae County 6200,ODO,000 6180,000 3/92.6/92 Not Avdl, O-Melvaney Two Separate leauae No Increase Rpumt Tramportation Commission Negotiated of Beginning, Lump Sum City of Anaheim 6130,000,000 /110,000 7192-1193 Not Avail. Jonas Hell Complete Structure Flat Fee Negotiated at Charge-fixed to Beginning-No Fee Synthtic fixed;dual track In..... Orionis County Sanitation 411B01800,000 11110,000 6/92-12192 1,259 Mudge Rode Advance Refunding Re Fee Negotiated at Districts of Orange County Flowing to Fixed Beginn n, In.....Odgimlly SWAP to Maturity Requosted of up to 4181,000 6180,000 for Total Cote of $280,000. Requested Increase Now At$70,000 Far .Total Fee of$180.000 3111/93 SFRT.%LS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 21 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLIS AVENUE I,a.BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-0127 March 18, 1993 nln 062.2411 (Revised) MEMORANDUM TO: Director Buck Catlin SUBJECT: Districts' Investment Policies Thank you for your thoughtful review and memorandum regarding investment policies. You have raised very important questions which are certainly relevant and need to be addressed. First, let me emphasize that Districts' staff has neither a position nor a recommendation on this issue. We are simply responding to a directive from the Executive Committee and attempting to provide the Directors with the best �./ information possible to aid them in evaluating this matter and arrive at a Board policy decision. Accordingly, we are pleased to provide you with the following information to address each of the issues raised in your March B, 1993, memo. For ease of review, we have restated each of the issues using the exact language in your memo. 1. Issue: There is an investment risk associated with reverse repurchase agreements. The District is not only at risk with respect to broker. but also at risk with respect to a volatile interest rate market. The policy that we have been asked to draft sets forth careful controls and procedures to reduce broker risk and to effectively manage interest rate risks. With regard to broker risk, there are no immediate plans to use the services of a broker. The Districts would work solely with SEC registered dealers, in particular our current underwriter Merrill Lynch. The City of Orange used an unqualified broker not governed by SEC scrutiny which would not be allowed under the District's proposed Master Purchase Agreement. Director Buck Catlin Districts' Investment Policies Page 2 March 18, 1993 (Revised) Under the proposed reverse repurchase program, there is limited dealer risk because of the collateralization portion of the transaction. If Merrill Lynch disappears with the Districts' $50 million in Treasury securities, the Districts have the commensurate cash and securities in a separate custodial account. With regard to interest rate risk, once the reverse repurchase agreement is in place, there is no interest rate risk because both rates are set by the agreement and purchase. The Treasury market can, however, fluctuate during the 90-day period which will affect the value of the Treasurys providing collateral. If, in a worst case scenario, treasury rates would increase by three points or more, the Districts would be required to buy some additional Treasurys at higher, more attractive rates to provide additional collateral. 2. Issue: There is the moral issue of utilizing County Sanitation funds to double-dip. by taking advantaae of the District's ability to issue tax- exempt debt. Why would a broker loan money at 3,25% when the broker could invest at 5.6% in U.S. aovernment obligations? - - because the broker is exchanaina a short-term loan for the security of a Iona-term investment. Perhaps there is a misunderstanding with regard to how Districts' debt issuance proceeds are handled. The Districts do = deposit debt proceeds into the County commingled pool and, in fact, are actually prevented from doing so by the transaction documents. We would not support the use of bond proceeds to fund a reverse repurchase program. Under a reverse repurchase program, the Districts would borrow and lend both in the taxable market. Regarding the second point, dealers do not invest in securities. Dealers hold an Inventory of securities only for a short period of time, not for investment. Dealers receive their compensation from the market-determined price of the securities. The Districts are not charged a broker fee. Director Buck Catlin Districts' Investment Policies Page 3 March 18, 1993 (Revised) 3. Issue: The District currently earns 8.17%. Is an additional 2.35% worth the tremendous risk associated with brokers? The City of Orange lost $7 million trustino brokers. as did many other oovernmental agencies. The City of Orange, and other agencies involved in the ITM and similar scandals, were victims of fraud and illegal operations. It is not a problem inherent to brokers. As noted above under Issue 1, the City of Orange used an unqualified broker not governed by the SEC which would not be allowed under Districts' procedures. Staff, in consultation with the Districts' independent auditors, has implemented a system of internal controls to avoid such problems. 4. Issue: The Orange County Treasurer has over $5 billion to invest. not $1 billion. There is a tremendous advantage in havino such a sizable portfolio to invest. especially with the expertise of Bob Citron. This conclusion implies two advantages to having the County Treasurer investing Districts' funds: expertise and the size of the portfolio. Certainly no one questions Bob Citron's expertise and long history of above market earnings. It is not proposed to withdraw any Districts' funds from the County. In fact, the draft reverse repurchase agreement policy under consideration assumes continued investment of all Districts' reserves by the County Treasurer. The proposed program requires pre-approved investments and quarterly reports, and will operate under a strict investment policy, a master agreement, and careful accounting procedures. Should the program under consideration be approved by the Joint Boards and demonstrate effective management and sufficient earnings, broader investment proposals may be considered by the Joint Boards in the future. With regard to the magnitude of the County's portfolio, the key advantage to the County's and other substantial investment programs (a Districts' $50 M reverse repurchase program would be considered substantial) is the attention received from the investment community which produces beneficial financial advice and program monitoring. Director Buck Catlin Districts' Investment Policies Page 4 March 18, 1993 (Revised) 5. Issue: The City of Anaheim has five employees charaed with handling the City's $200 million portfolio. The District would likely reauire eauivalent staffing to handle their own oortfolio. It is our understanding that the City of Anaheim's program requires five people because that group's responsibility also involves daily cash management, revenue collection, and other fiscal duties, as well as investment. In our case, different divisions within our Finance Department handle those other duties. The County of Orange has three individuals investing and managing their $5 billion portfolio. Staff has very carefully evaluated the investing and accounting efforts necessary to administer the proposed $50 million reverse repurchase agreement program and is comfortable that the proposed program can be accomplished without additional staff. One reason for this is that our Financial Manager has been working on several "special projects" which are winding down, thus freeing time for other work such as this. 6. Issue: As District staff admits in the proposal. investment performance will be reduced as short-term interest rates rise. Certainly one of the givens is that performance will fluctuate over time. Historically, the yield curve, which determines short and long- term rates, is usually positively sloped; that is, long-term rates will be higher than short-term. The difference between the two is referred to as spread. Clearly, the spread between the two can contract or expand over time, permitting a lesser or greater return. The current market spread is especially attractive for a reverse repurchase program. If the program is approved, the financial team will monitor the relationship between short and long-term rates, and the treasury and reverse repo market using a sophisticated on-line, computerized financial markets monitoring system called Bloomberg. The Bloomberg system is the same one used by dealers such as Merrill Lynch, the County of Orange, Orange County Water District, Irvine Ranch Water District and other public agencies with substantial investment programs. Director Buck Catlin Districts' Investment Policies i Page 5 March 18, 1993 (Revised) Once again, I would like to thank you for your thoughtful review and comments. If you have further questions or would like additional information, please feel free to contact our Finance Director, Gary Streed, or our Financial Manager, Patti Gorczyca. They would also be pleased to discuss this matter with your City's financial staff. We will be providing your memo and a copy of this memorandum to the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee for their consideration. J. Wayne Sylvester General Manager JWS:lc `� flEF:C:\IWGOtG\rPC.MTGIMMPGFPC3.1] Attachment cc: William D. Mahoney, Joint Chairman Charles E. Puckett, Fiscal Policy Committee Chairman MEMORANDUM To: Bill Mahoney, Joint Boards Chairman, CSDOC Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, CSDOC Chuck Puckett, Fiscal Policy Committee Chairman FROM: Buck Catlin, Director Districts 2 & 3 DATE: March 8, 1993 SUBJECT: Reverse Repurchase Agreements Policy I have referred our prospective revisions to the Districts' Investment Management Policy to the city of Fullerton's Finance Department for review with me. After a lengthy examination of the implications incident to separately managing a portion of the reserve fund portfolio, we have drawn a number of negative conclusions that give me pause in recommending approval of these revisions, viz. : 1. There is an investment risk associated with reverse repurchase agreements. The District is not only at risk with respect to the broker, but also at risk with respect to a volatile interest rate market. 2. There is the moral issue of utilizing County sanitation funds to double dip, by taking advantage of the District's ability to issue tax-exempt debt. Why would a broker loan money at 3.25% when the broker could invest at 5.6% in U.S. government obligations? -- because the broker is exchanging a short-term loan for the security of a long-term investment. 3 . The District currently earns 8.17%. Is an additional 2.35% worth the tremendous risk associated with brokers? The City of Orange lost $7 million trusting brokers, as did many other governmental agencies. 4. The Orange County Treasurer has over $5 billion to invest, not $1 billion. There is a tremendous advantage in having such a sizable portfolio to invest, especially with the expertise of Bob Citron. 5. The city of Anaheim has five employees charged with handling the City's $200 million portfolio. The District would likely require equivalent staffing to handle their own portfolio. 6. As District staff admits in the proposal, investment performance will be reduced as short-term interest rates rise. Conclusion Two. Concerns me in that tax free municipal bonds were intended to provide facilities for public use and not for the benefit of private financial companies to leverage profits or gain better corporate income tax positions. Although legal, this does not sit well with the public. Conclusion Three and Four. Rather than accept the additional risk with a private firm, I feel reassured with the expertise of the Orange County Treasurer, notwithstanding the potential 2.35% interest gain for the District. Conclusion Five. I am not persuaded that overseeing this new proposal will not require additional staff time and resources. Accordingly, Pq District 2 and 3 Director, I am not supportive of the opos visions to the Investment Management Policy. A.B. Catlin Director, Districts 2 & 3 ABC:mp RESOLUTION NO. 93- DESIGNATING A DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND THE ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER- TAX COLLECTOR TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING A DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS kkkkkkkkkkkk The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That is hereby appointed as Treasurer of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California. Section 2: The authority of the Boards of Directors to invest or reinvest Districts' surplus funds or to sell or exchange securities so purchased or to deposit for safekeeping the funds and investments of the Districts with depositories as provided for in California Government Code Section 53608 and 53630, is hereby delegated to the Districts' Treasurer, as authorized by California Government Code Section 53607. Section : The Districts' Treasurer is authorized to direct that the Districts' surplus funds or any portion thereof be deposited into the care, custody and control of the Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County of Orange for purposes of investment or reinvestment. 1 Section 4: That the Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County of Orange (Co. Treasurer) be and is hereby authorized and directed to invest or to reinvest all funds belonging to the Districts which have been transferred to the Co. Treasurer, in those instruments as authorized by California Government Code Section 53601 and/or in deposits with depositories, as authorized by California Government Code Section 53635. The Co. Treasurer is further authorized and directed to sell or exchange securities so purchased and to terminate or renew deposits so made. Each of these authorizations is to continue until the further order of the Boards of Directors of the Districts or the Districts' Treasurer. Section : That these investments, deposits, sales of investments, termination or renewal of deposits, are to be made by the Districts' Treasurer and Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County of Orange only after consultation with and direction by the General Manager of the Districts or his designee. Section That the Districts' Treasurer and Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County of Orange, upon confirmation by the General Manager of the Districts, are hereby authorized and directed to prepare such records of account as are necessary to effect the transfer of funds required to make the indicated investments. Section 7: In the event of the temporary absence of the Districts' Treasurer, the Districts' General Manager is hereby delegated the authority to appoint an Acting Treasurer to carry out the powers and duties of the office of Districts' Treasurer. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held , 1993. akF:C:I VlPOCCSUESOS\Tu.Re 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (DISTRICTS) STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY FOR FUNDS CONTROLLED BY DISTRICTS' TREASURER March 10, 1993 Introduction This statement is intended to specify policies for prudent investment of the Districts' reserve funds not required for the immediate needs of the Districts and to provide guidelines for suitable investments and safeguards for sound investment strategies. The ultimate goal is to enhance financial return to the Districts while protecting its cash reserves. The investment policies and practices of the Districts' are based on federal, �. state and local law and prudent cash management principles. The primary goals of these policies are: 1 . To assure compliance with all federal, state and local laws governing the investment of monies under the control of the Districts'. 2. To protect the principal monies entrusted to the Districts'. 3. To generate the maximum amount of investment income within the parameters of this Statement of Investment Policy and the guidelines for suitable investments. I. AUTHORITY FOR MANAGING INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO A. Districts' Treasurer The responsibility for the day-to-day investment of Districts' cash is delegated to the Districts' Treasurer. B. Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County of Oranae The Districts may transfer all or a portion of their funds, and responsibility for safekeeping and investment thereof, to the Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County of Orange, who shall manage such funds pursuant to his or her separate policies and procedures and applicable provisions of the California Government Code. II. SCOPE In accordance with Resolution No. , the District's Treasurer is authorized to invest the Districts' funds in accordance with the California Government Code Section 53600 at. seq. This investment policy applies to all the Districts' reserve funds and investment activities. All monies entrusted to the Districts' Treasurer will be pooled in an actively managed portfolio. The Districts' Treasurer will monitor, evaluate and react to changing economic conditions that affect the portfolio. III. OBJECTIVES A. Safety of Principal Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the Districts' investment policy. Each investment transaction shall seek to ensure that capital losses are avoided, whether from institutional default, broker-dealer default, or erosion of market value of securities. The Districts shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating the two types of risk, credit risk and market risk. 1 . Credit Risk. Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of an issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by investing in only very safe institutions and by diversifying the portfolio so that the failure of any one issuer would not unduly harm the Districts' cash flow. Page 2 2. Market Risk. The risk of market value fluctuations due to overall changes in the general level of interest rates, shall be �..i mitigated by limiting the weighted average maturity of the Districts' portfolio to no greater than five years. It is explicitly recognized herein, however, that in a diversified portfolio, occasional measured losses are inevitable, and must be considered within the context of the overall investment return. B. Liquidity Liquidity is the second most important objective of the Districts' investment policy. It is important that an investment contain the feature of being easily sold at any time with a minimal risk of loss of some portion of principal or interest. The Districts may experience unexpected or unusual circumstances that result in some investments needing to be sold to meet a contingency. Therefore, the Districts shall maintain a high degree of liquidity in its total cash reserves portfolio and will at all times maintain a 15% target level of highly liquid securities. C. Return on Investment The Districts' portfolio shall be designed to attain a better than market-average rate of return through economic cycles. The market-average rate of return is defined as the average return on three-month U.S. Treasury Bills. Whenever possible, consistent with risk limitations as defined herein and prudent investment principles, the Treasurer shall seek to augment returns above the market average rate of return. IV. SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES To protect against potential losses caused by collapse of individual securities dealers, all securities owned by the Districts, including collateral on repurchase agreements, but necessarily excluding securities used as collateral for reverse repurchase agreements, shall be held in safekeeping with "perfected interest" by a third party bank trust department, acting as agent for the Districts under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and by the Districts. All securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery vs. payment procedures. i Page 3 V. REPORTING The Districts' Treasurer shall render a report no less than quarterly to the Districts' Fiscal Policy Committee, Executive Committee and Joint Boards of Directors detailing the type of investment, institution, date of maturity, amount of deposit, current market value for all securities with a maturity of more than 12 months, rate of interest, and such other data as may be required by the Joint Boards of Directors. The report shall also detail all repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and shall reflect the relationship of the data in the report to this statement of investment policy. The Districts' Treasurer shall prepare a Quarterly Portfolio Performance Analysis Report, for review by the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Districts' independent auditors, showing average daily funds invested, interest earned, yield and average life, and current market value. Other subject matter would include the general condition of the portfolio, outlook for future interest rates, and planned strategy for executing future investment transactions. VI. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS Generally, investments shall be made in the context of the "prudent S%.101 investor" rule, which states that: "Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived." The Districts' investments are governed by the California Government Code, Sections 53600 et sec. Within the context of those provisions, the following investments are authorized, as further limited herein: A. United States Treasury Bills, Bonds and Notes, or those certificates of indebtedness for which the full faith and credit of the United States are pledged for payment of principal and interest. There is no limitation as to the percentage of the portfolio which can be invested in this category. Page 4 B. Covered call options on U.S. Treasury instruments described in A above. Such options may not exceed 30 days. C. Obligations issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), the Federal Farm Credit Bank System (FFCB), the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLB), and the Federal National Mortgage Association (FEMA). Although there is no percentage limitation on these issues, the "prudent investor" rule shall apply for a single agency name. D. Bills of exchange or time drafts drawn on and accepted by a commercial bank, otherwise known as banker's acceptances. Banker's acceptances purchased may not exceed 270 days to maturity or 40% of the market value of the portfolio. No more than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be invested in banker's acceptances issued by any one bank. E. Commercial paper ranked P1 by Moody's Investor Services or Al by Standard and Poor's, and issued by a domestic corporation having assets in excess of $500,000,000 and having an A or better rating on its long-term debentures as provided by Moody's or Standard and Poor's. Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed 180 days to maturity nor represent more than 10% of the outstanding paper of an issuing corporation. Purchases of commercial paper may not exceed 15% of the market value of the portfolio. No more than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper issued by any one corporation. F. Negotiable certificates of deposit (NCD) issued by a nationally or state-chartered bank or a state or federal savings and loan association. Any negotiable certificates of deposit eligible for investment shall be rated in a rating category of "A" or its equivalent or better by a nationally recognized rating service. Purchases of negotiable certificates of deposits may not exceed 30% of the market value of the portfolio and Districts' total investment shall not exceed the maximum deposit as provided in Government Code Section 53638. G. Repurchase agreements. The Districts may invest in repurchase agreements with banks and dealers with which the Districts have entered into a repurchase contract which specifies terms and conditions of repurchase agreements. The maturity of repurchase Page 5 agreements shall not exceed one year. The market value of securities used as collateral for repurchase agreements shall be monitored daily by the Districts' Treasurer and will not be allowed to fall below 100% of the value of the repurchase agreement. In order to conform with provisions of the Federal Bankruptcy Code which provides for the liquidation of securities held as collateral for repurchase agreements, only securities that are direct obligations of, or that are fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the United States or any agency of the United States shall be eligible collateral. H. Reverse repurchase agreements. The Districts may invest only with those banks and dealers with which the Districts have entered into a repurchase agreement (see standard form of agreement attached to Districts' Reverse Repurchase Agreement Guidelines) outlining terms and conditions of repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements. No more than $50 million of the market value of the investment portfolio may be invested in reverse repurchase agreements. The Districts may invest in reverse repurchase agreements for two purposes: 1 . The Districts may enter into a reverse repurchase agreement when an unanticipated cash outflow can, in the judgment of the Treasurer, be met more advantageously by entering into a reverse repurchase agreement than by selling securities outright. In such a case, the reverse repurchase shall not exceed one year, and shall be matched to a known cash inflow of sufficient size to repay the principal and interest of the reverse repurchase agreement. 2. The Districts may enter into reverse repurchase agreements when funds obtained through the reverse can be reinvested in a higher yielding security to obtain additional interest income for the Districts at a spread deemed to be acceptable by the Treasurer under then prevailing market conditions. Reverse repurchase agreements entered into in accordance with this paragraph may not exceed one year to maturity, and must be matched as to maturity and dollars invested with its corresponding reinvestment. I. County of Orange Commingled Investment Pool. The Districts' Treasurer may invest up to 100% of its cash in the County of Orange Commingled Investment Pool established by the Treasurer- Page 6 Tax Collector of the County of Orange for the benefit of local agencies up to the maximum permitted by the Treasurer-Tax ..i Collector of the County of Orange. J. Local Agency Investment Fund. The Districts may invest in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) established by the California State Treasurer for the benefit of local agencies up to the maximum permitted by state law or LAW rules. K. Time Deposits. The Districts may invest in non-negotiable time deposits collateralized in accordance with the California Government Code, in those banks and savings and loan associations which meet the requirements for investment in negotiable certificates of deposit. Since time deposits are not liquid, no more than 25% of the portfolio may be invested in this category. L. Medium-term notes of a maximum of five years maturity issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States. Notes eligible for investment shall be rated in a rating category of "A" or its equivalent, or better, by a nationally recognized rating service. No more than 30% of the fund may be invested in medium term notes. M. Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies, otherwise known as mutual funds, as defined in Section 23701(m) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, investing in the securities and obligations as authorized by subdivisions (A) to (L), inclusive, of that section and which comply with the investment restrictions (California Government Code) commencing with Section 53601. No more than 15% of the fund may be invested in mutual funds. Companies shall either: 1 . Attain the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two of the three largest nationally recognized rating services, and; 2. Have an investment registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years' experience investing in the securities and obligations as authorized by subdivisions (a) to (m), inclusive and with a i Page 7 assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). The purchase price of shares of beneficial interest, (mutual funds) purchase pursuant to this subdivision shall not include any commission that these companies may charge. N. Collateralized Negotiable Investment. The Districts may invest in notes, bonds, or other obligations which are at all times secured by a valid first priority security interest. The securities serving as collateral shall be placed by delivery or book entry into the custody of a trust company or the trust department of a bank which is not affiliated with the issuer of the secured obligation, and the security interest shall be perfected in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code or Federal regulations applicable to the types of securities in which the security interest is granted. 0. Ineligible investments. Investments not described herein, including, but not limited to common stocks are prohibited from use. Any potential exceptions to the policy will be submitted to the Boards of Directors for review and policy determinations. VII. QUALIFIED DEALERS AND INSTITUTIONS The Districts shall transact business only with banks, savings and loans, and registered investment securities dealers. The purchase by the Districts of any investment other than those purchased directly from the issuer, shall be purchased either from an institution licensed by the State of California as a broker-dealer, as defined in Section 25004 of the California Corporations Code, who is a member of a the National Association of Securities Dealers, or a member of a federally regulated securities exchange, a national or state-chartered bank, a federal or state association (as defined by Section 5102 of the California Financial Code), or a brokerage firm designated as a Primary Government Dealer by the Federal Reserve Bank. The Districts' Treasurer shall investigate all institutions which the Districts select to do business with in order to determine if they are adequately capitalized, make markets in securities appropriate to the Districts' needs, and agree to abide by the conditions set forth in the Districts' Investment Policy. Page 8 �./ Vill. INVESTMENT CONTROLS The Districts' Director of Finance has developed a system of internal investment controls and a segregation of responsibilities of investment functions in order to assure an adequate system of internal control over the investment function. These controls include: • Separating investment transaction authority from accounting and record keeping; • Custodial safekeeping of investments; • Periodic statements from custodial banks; • Clear designation of authority and chain of command; • Written confirmation of telephone transactions; • Two signatures to authorize a transaction; • Minimizing the number of authorized investment officials; • Documentation of transactions and strategies; • Review of contracts and agreements by legal counsel IX. POLICY REVIEW This Investment Policy shall be reviewed at least annually to ensure its consistency with the overall objectives of safety of principal, liquidity, and return on investment, and its relevance to current law, financial and economic trends, and to meet the needs of the Districts. REFZAWP CSVNVEST.KY TW Page 9 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (DISTRICTS) TREASURER REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT GUIDELINES March 10, 1993 INTRODUCTION The Districts recognize that the reverse repurchase agreement (Reverse Repo) can be an effective investment vehicle for increasing the overall earnings on its cash reserves and, therefore, the Districts' Statement of Investment Policy permits the Districts to invest in reverse repurchase agreements not exceeding $50 million of the Districts' total cash reserves. GENERAL GUIDELINES To protect the Districts' cash reserves invested through repurchase agreements, the following guidelines are hereby established governing the Districts' use of repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements. These safety measures include: a) careful selection of banks and securities dealers. b) proper collateralization procedures and pricing practices. c) delivery of collateral to the Districts or its custodian; and d) use of a master repurchase agreement. SELECTION OF BANK AND DEALERS The Districts' Treasurer shall exercise special caution in selecting parties with whom to conduct repurchase transactions and be able to identify the parties acting as principals to the transaction. Such requirements are detailed in the Districts' Master Repurchase Agreement, described below. COLLATERALIZATION PRACTICES Proper collateralization practices are necessary to protect the Districts' cash invested in repurchase agreements. Risk is significantly reduced through physical delivery of underlying securities for safekeeping with the Districts' custodian. Overcollateralization, commonly referred to as "haircuts," or marking to market practices, shall be mandatory procedures. Such requirements are detailed in the Districts' Master Repurchase Agreement, described below. MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT The master repurchase agreement is an "umbrella" contract that will govern all individual repurchase agreement transactions between the Districts and a depository or securities dealer. The master agreement provides the general terms under which each transaction will be conducted. The master agreement establishes the legal responsibilities of both parties in each transaction, recites what laws will govern the transaction, and provides contractual rights for the Districts in the event that the other party defaults. In any event of default, these contractual rights are particularly important to the Districts, because receivers and bankruptcy courts tend to recognize the claims of parties to a written contract more readily than those whose interests are undocumented. The Districts' Master Repurchase Agreement, a standard copy of which is attached hereto, contains each of the following provisions and safeguards: Definitions: The agreement sets forth definitions for such terms as act of insolvency, default, purchased securities, margin amount, confirmation, income margin excess, market value, price differential, pricing rate, purchase date, and repurchase price. Execution Procedures: The agreement indicates how a repurchase transaction is initiated, whether confirmations are necessary, and how the agreement is terminated. Representations: The agreement provides certain representations between the buyer and seller. These representations include expectations of the two parties, and a reaffirmation of legal authority to transact business. Event of Default: The most important provision of the agreement is the concise listing of events of default. The agreement identifies those conditions under which special remedies become necessary. Events of default include acts of insolvency, misrepresentations, failure to deliver, and other events that would threaten the interests of one of the parties. It also establishes the liability of the defaulting party. Page 2 z Governing Law: The agreement establishes the State of California as the jurisdiction governing transactions. u Purchased Securities (Repo "Collateral"): The agreement identifies what securities constitute eligible instruments for delivery under the repurchase transaction. Substitution: The agreement indicates whether the seller may substitute securities, and if so, the limitations on such substitutions. It identifies who pays for the cost of transferring substituted securities. Overcollateralization (Haircuts): The agreement provides for excess collateral as a protection for investors. The Districts have established a collateralization ratio of 2% in the master agreement. Marking to Market: The agreement provides for "margin maintenance" or other methods for valuing and adjusting the collateral securities held under the repurchase agreement, so that price losses in the marketplace are compensated by the seller delivering additional collateral to safekeeping. Supplemental Terms and Conditions: The agreement may be amended or supplemented, as necessary. ..r Accounting Procedures: The Districts' Director of Finance has developed a system of internal investment controls and a segregation of responsibilities of investment functions in order to assure an adequate system of internal control over the investment function. The following accounting procedures are required to assure proper accounting for reverse repurchase agreements: • The underlying securities will be included as investments (assets) in the Districts' financial statements. The securities will be included in the Districts' investment footnote disclosure as "investments held by broker-dealers under reverse repurchase agreements." • The payment required to repurchase the securities will be shown as a liability in the Districts' financial statements with a caption such as "obligations under reverse repurchase agreements." • The Districts will track income on the securities net of interest expense on the repurchase liability in separate general ledger accounts from other investment income. • Financial statement disclosures regarding the market value of the securities and credit exposure will be prepared. Page 3 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES , The following additional implementation guidelines are established to direct and govern the Districts' reverse repurchase agreements: A. The Districts' Treasurer may invest up to $50 million of its cash reserves in reverse repurchase agreements via pre-approval of investments by the Fiscal Policy Committee. B. The Districts' Treasurer will report quarterly to the Fiscal Policy Committee, Executive Committee and Joint Boards of Directors on reverse repurchase agreement investment performance. V REF:CAWP CSVNVEST.GLY MRSEAM - Page 4 r a�iCtiJ , 4;*0na :Zia AVvd4a, nLvetur:, Jraa .v 70LJ704 (l1YU Vie z boo MISTER REPURCAASF ACRFFMFiVT THIS MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT is made and entered into,to be effecttve this _ day of 1993, by and between: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. I OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, hereinafter referred to as "Buyer"; AND MERRILL LYNCH GOVERNMENT SECURITIES INC., hereinafter referred to as "Seller". WITNESSETH: Section 1: Annlicability. From time to time, the parties hereto may enter into transactions in which one party ("Seller") agrees to transfer to the other ("Buyer") securities or r.. financial instruments ("Securities") against the transfer of funds to Buyer, with a simultaneous agreement by Buyer to transfer to Seller such Securities at a date certain or on demand, against the transfer of funds by Seller. Each such transaction shall be referred to herein as a "Transaction" and shall be governed by this Agreement, including any supplemental terms or conditions contained in Annex I, attached hereto. Section 2: Definition . (a) "Act of Insolvency", with respect to any party, (i) the commencement by such party as debtor of any case or proceeding under any bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, liquidation, dissolution or similar law, or such party seeking the appointment of a receiver, trustee, custodian or similar official for such patty or any substantial part of its property; or(ii) the commencement of any such case or proceeding against such party or another seeking such an appointment, or the filing against a parry of an application for a protective decree under the provisions of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, which (A) is consented to or not timely contested by such party, (B) results in the entry of an order for relief, such an appointment, the issuance of such a protective decree or the entry of an order having a similar effect, or (C) is not dismissed within 15 days; (iii) the making by a party of a general assignment for the benefit of creditors; or(iv) the admission in writing by a party of such parry's inability to pay such parry's debts as they become due. (b) "Additional Purchased Securities", securities provided by Seller to Buyer pursuant to Section 4(a) hereof; ttv:vl(afAm:,trva 1 UJ-1.11J il:4 .hl :cVa lv VaAE, 6UUL11aW:. J[aA ra bQLJ904 -VUb- u:G (c) "Buyer's Margin Amount", with respect to any Transaction as of any date, the amount obtained by application of a percentage (which may be equal to the percentage that is agreed to as the Seller's Margin Amount under subparagraph (q) of this Section), agreed to by Buyer and Seller prior to entering into the Transaction, to the Repurchase Price for such Transaction as of such date; (d) "Confirmation", the meaning specified in Section 3(b) hereof; (e) "Income", with respect to any Security at any time, any principal thereof then payable and all interest dividends or other distributions thereon; (f) "Margin Deficit", the meaning specified in Section 4(a) hereof. (g) "Margin Excess", the meaning specified in Section 4(b) hereof; (h) "Market Value", with respect to any Securities as of any date, the price for such Securities on such date obtained from a generally recognized source, plus accrued Income to the extent not included therein (other than any Income credited or transferred to, or applied to the obligations of, Seller pursuant to Section 5 hereof) as of such date(unless contrary to market practice for such Securities); (i) "Price Differential", with respect m any Transaction hereunder as of any date, the aggregate amount obtained by daily application of the Pricing Rate for such Ttansactions to the Purchase Price for such Transaction on a 360-day per year basis for the actual number of days during the period commencing on (and including) the Purchase Date for such Transaction and ending on (but excluding) the date of determination (rrxluced by any amount of such Price Differential previously paid by Seller to Buyer with respect to such Transaction); 0) "Pricing Rate", the per annum percentage rate for determination of the Price Differential; (k) "Prime Rate", the prime rate of U.S. money center commercial bank. as published in "The Wall Street foumal"; (1) "Purchasing Date", the date on which Purchased Securities are transferred by Seller to Buyer, (m) "Purchase Price", (i) on the Purchase Date, the price at which Purchased Securities are transferred by Seller to Buyer, and (it) thereafter, such price increased by the amount of any cash transferred by Buyer to Seller pursuant to Section 4(b) hereof and decreased by the amount of any cash transferred by Seller to Buyer pursuant to Section 4(a) hereof or applied to reduce Seller's obligations under clause (ii) of Section 5 hereof; rcw:viwss,mn,na 2 " V�tL'y: tt:{p8a fEWI AVUhhL, aVV ULVr:, Jr Ea 1J yp(Vyeµ ;Jpy, VI z \.� (n) "Purchased Securities", the Securities transferred by Seller to Buyer in a Transaction hereunder, and shall include only those Securities authorized under Government Code Section 53635. The term "Purchased Securities", with respect to any Transaction at any time, also shall include Additional Purchased Securities delivered pursuant to Section 4(a) and shall exclude Securities returned pursuant to Section 4(b); (o) "Repurchase Date", the date on which Seller is to repurchase the Purchased Securities from Buyer, including any date determined by application of the provisions of Sections 3(c) or 11 hereof. (p) "Repurchase Price", the price at which Purchased Securities are to be transferred from Buyer to Seller upon termination of a Transaction, which will be determined in each case (including Transactions terminable upon demand), as the sum of the Purchase Price and the Price Differential as of the date of such determination, increased by any amount determined by the application of the provisions of Section 11 hereof: (q) "Seller's Margin Amount", with respect to any Transaction as of any date, the amount obtained by application of a percentage (which may be equal to the percentage that is agreed to as the Buyer's Margin Amount under subparagraph (c) of this Section), agreed to by Buyer and Seller prior to entering into the Transaction, to the Repurchase Price for such Transaction as of such date. �r Section3: Initiation: Confirmation: Termination. (a) An agreement to enter into a Transaction may be made orally or in writing at the initiation of either Buyer or Seller. On the Purchase Date for the Transaction, the Purchased Securities shall be transferred to Buyer or its agent against the transfer of the Purchase Price to an account of Seller. (b) Upon agreeing to enter into a'rransacnon nereunder, buyer or Scllcr (vi both), as shall be agreed, shall promptly deliver to the other party, a written confirmation of each Transaction (a "Confirmation"). The Confirmation shall describe the Purchased Securities (including CUSPID number, if any), identify Buyer and Seller, and set forth (i) the Purchase Date, (ii) the Purchase Price, (iii) the Repurchase Date, unless the Transaction is to be terminable on demand, (iv) the Pricing Rate or Repurchase Price applicable to the Transactinn, and (v) additional terms or conditions of the Transaction not inconsistent with the Agreement. The Confirmation. together with this Agreement, shall constitute conclusive evidence of the terms agreed between Buyer and Seller with respect to the Transaction to which the Confirmation relates, unless with respect to the Confirmation, specific objection is made promptly after receipt thereof. In the event of any conflict between the terms of such Confirmation and this Agreement, this Agreement shall prevail. (c) In the case of Transactions terminable upon demand, such demand shall be made by Buyer or Seller, no later than such time as is customary in accordance with market TLw:ry'(055)Ip/IIK) 3 w-ic'a: u :.a:.:u rcvm r,cvar:n, sv�ror,urr, ucn :v 9L:aaar rUU�:Vio , a practice, by telephone or otherwise on or prior to the business day on which such termination will be effective. On the date specified in such demand, or on the date fixed for termination in the case of Transactions having a fixed term, termination of the Transaction will be effected by transfer to Seller or its agent of the Purchased Securities and any income in respect thereof received by Buyer (and not preciously credited or transferred to, or applied to the obligations of, Seller pursuant to Section 5 hereof) against the transfer of the Repurchase Price to an account of Buyer. Section 4: Marein Maintenance, (a) If at any time the aggregate Market Value of all Purchased Securities subject to all Transactions in which a particular party hereto is acting as Buyer is less than the aggregate Buyer's Margin Amount for all such Transactions (a "Margin Deficit"), then Buyer may, by notice to Seller, require Seller in such Transaction, at Seller's option, to transfer to Buyer cash or additional securities reasonably acceptable to Buyer ("Additional Purchased Securities"), so that the cash and aggregate Market Value of the Purchased Securities, including any such Additional Purchased Securities, will thereupon equal or exceed such aggregate Buyer's Margin Amount (decreased by the amount of any Margin Deficit as of such date arising from any Transactions in which such Buyer is acting as Seiler). (b) If at any time the aggregate Market Value of all Purchased Securities subject to all Transactions in which a particular party hereto is acting as Seller exceeds the aggregate Seller's Margin Amount for all such Transactions at such time (a "Margin Excess"), then Seller may, by notice to Buyer, require Buyer in such Transactions, at Buyer's option, to transfer cash or Purchased Securities to Seller, so that the aggregate Market Value of the Purchased Securities, after deduction of any such cash or any Purchased Securities so transferred, will thereupon not exceed such aggregate Seller's Margin Amount (increased by the amount of any Margin Excess as of such date arising from any Transactions in which such Seller is acting as Buyer). (c) Any cash transferred pursuant to this Section shall be attributed to such Transactions as shall be agreed upon by Buyer and Seller. (d) Seller and Buyer may agree, with respect to any or all Transactions hereunder, that the respective rights of Buyer or Seller (or both) under subparagraphs (a) and (b) of this Paragraph may be exercised only where a Margin Deficit of Margin Excess exceeds a specified dollar amount or a specified percentage of the Repurchase Price for such Transactions (which amount or percentage shall be agreed to by Buyer and Seller prior to entering into any such Transactions). (e) Seller and Buyer may agree, with respect to any or all Transactions hereunder, that the respective rights of Buyer and Seller under subparagraphs (a) and (b) of this Section to require the elimination of a Margin Deficit or a Margin Excess, as the case may be, may be exercised whenever such a Margin Deficit or Margin Excess exists with respect to any -- '�LW:pj(Bf31W/IIMI 4 drtc-:, lt: crill taus avuaas. auvusurr. sraa 7V 86uy54 1'Ullbi!11D single Transaction hereunder (calculated without regard to any other Transaction outstanding under this Agreement), Section 5: Incomt Payments. Where a particular Transaction's term extends over an Income Payment date on the Securities, subject to that Transaction, Buyer shall, as the parties may agree with respect to such Transaction (or, in the absence of any agreement, as Buyer shall reasonably determine in its discretion), on the date such Income is payable either (i) transfer to or credit to the account of Seiler an amount equal to such Income Payment or Payments with respect to any Purchased Securities subject to such Transaction; or (ii) apply the Income Payment or Payments to reduce the amount to be transferred to Buyer by Seller upon termination of the Transaction. Buyer shall not be obligated to take any action pursuant to the preceding sentence to the extent that such action would result In the creation of a Margin Deficit, unless prior thereto or simultaneously therewith Seller transfers to Buyer cash or Additional Purchased Securities sufficient to eliminate such Margin Deficit. Section 6: &=e ntylntezesl. Although the parties intend that all Transactions hereunder be sales and purchases and not loans, in the event any such Transactions are deemed to be loans, Seller shall be deemed to have pledged to Buyer, as security for the performance by Seller of its obligations under each such Transaction, and shall be deemed to have granted to Buyer a security interest in, all of the Purchased Securities with respect to all Transactions hereunder and all proceeds thereof. Section 7; Pavmenl and Transfer. Unless otherwise mutually agreed,all transfers of funds hereunder shall be immediately available funds. All Securities transferred by one party hereto to the other party (i) shall be in suitable form for transfer or shall be accompanied by duly executed instruments of transfer or assignment in blank and such other documentation as the party receiving possession may reasonably request; (ii) shall be transferred on the book-entry system of a Federal Reserve Bank; or (iii) shall be transferred by any other method mutually acceptable to Seller and Buyer. As used herein with respect to Securities, "transfer" is intended to have the same meaning as when used in Section 5313 of the California Uniform Commercial Code, or, where applicable, in any Federal Regulation governing transfers of the Securities. Sedan g: SeRre ation of Purchased Securities. To the extent required by applicable law, all Purchased Securities in the possession of Seller shall be segregated from other securities in its possession and shall be identified as subject to this Agreement. Segregation may he accomplished by appropriate identification on the books and records of the holder, including a financial intermediary or a clearing corporation. Tide to all Purchased Securities shall pass to Buyer, and unless otherwise agreed by Buyer and Seller, nothing in this Agreement shall preclude Buyer from engaging in repurchase transactions with Purchased Securities or otherwise pledging or hypothecating the Purchased Securities, but no such transaction shall relieve Buyer of its obligations to transfer Purchased Securities to Seller pursuant to Sections 3, 4 or 11 hereof, or of Buyer's obligation to credit or pay Income to, or apply Income to the obligations of, Seller pursuant to Section 5 hereof. riw:sirotAmm�r 5 w-:cyo ut4aau rau51 auuaaa, autroaurr, araA iG ae[�l164 tlIUI/Ulf 1 Section 9: Substitutions. (a) If Buyer consents to the substitution of Purchased Securities, such substituted securities shall consist of U.S. Treasury Bills, or those securities as authorized by law and as identified by Buyer, with the same or better credit quality than the original securities being held,and the Seller shall absorb all costs associated with accomplishing such substitutions. (b) Seller is not permitted to substitute other securities for those subject to this Agreement, and therefore must keep Buyer's securities segregated at all times, unless in this Agreement Buyer grants Seller the right to substitute other securities. If Buyer grants the right to substitute, this means that Buyer's securities will likely be commingled with Seller's own securities during the trading day. Buyer is advised that, during any trading day that Buyer's securities are commingled with Seller's securities, they will be subject to liens granted by Seller to its Clearing Bank and may be used by Seller for deliveries on other securities transactions. whenever the securities are commingled, Seller's ability to resegregate substitute securities for Buyer will be subject to Seller's ability to satisfy the clearing lien or to obtain substitute securities. Section I : Reoresenredons. Each of Buyer and Seller represents and warrants to the other that (i) it is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement, to enter into the Transactions contemplated hereunder and to perform its obligations hereunder and has taken all necessary action to authorize such execution, delivery and performance; (ii) it will engage in such Transactions as principal (or, if agreed in writing, in advance of any Transaction by the l other party hereto, as agent for a disclosed principal; (iii) the person signing this Agreement on its behalf is duly authorized to do so on its behalf(or on behalf of any such disclosed principal); (iv) it has obtained all authorizations of any governmental body required in connection with this Agreement and the Transactions hereunder, and such authorizations are in full force and effect; and (v) the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the Transactions hereunder will not violate any law, ordinance, charter, by-law or rule applicable to it or any agreement by which it is bound or by which any of its assets are affected. On the Purchase Date for any Transaction, Buyer and Seller shall each be deemed to repeat all the foregoing representations made by it. Section 11: Events of Default. In the event that (i) Seller fails to repurchase or Buyer fails to transfer Purchased Securities upon the applicable Repurchase Date; (ii) Seller or Buyer fails, after one business day's notice, to comply with Section 4 hereof; (iii) Buyer fails to comply with Section 5 hereof; (iv) an Act of Insolvency occurs with respect to Seller or Buyer; (v)any representation made by Seller or Buyer shall have been incorrect or untrue in any material respect when made or repeated or deemed to have been made or repeated; or(vi) Seller or Buyer shall adroit to the other its inability to, or its Intention not to, perform any of its obligations hereunder (each an "Event of Default"): (a) At the option of the nondefaulting party, exercised by written notice to the defaulting party (which option shall be deemed to have been exercised, even if no notice is rtw.pjm55LM+m U,1-lc-:i 1L:4Chfit :t4idl fVU:_C, r?VvuaU'rr, arhh iv UUM4 ruuGrultl ..� given, immediately upon the occurrence of an Act of Insolvency), the Repurchase Dare for each Transaction hereunder shall be deemed immediately to occur. (b) In all Transactions in which the defaulting party is acting as Seller, if the nondefaulting parry exercised or is deemed to have exercised the option referred to in subparagraph (a) of this Section, (i) the defaulting party's obligations hereunder to repurchase all Purchased Securities in such Transactions shall thereupon become immediately due and payable; (ii)to the extent permitted by applicable law, the Repurchase Price with respect to each such Transaction shall be increased by the aggregate amount obtained by daily application of(x) the greater of the Pricing Rate for such Transaction or the Prime Rate to (y) the Repurchase Price for such Transaction as of the Repurchase Date as determined pursuant to subparagraph (a) of this Section (decreased as of any day by (A) any amounts retained by the nondefaulting party with respect to such Repurchase Price pursuant to clause (iii) of this subparagraph; (B) any proceeds from the sale of Purchased .Securities pursuant to subparagraph (d)(i) of this Section; and (C)any amounts credited to the account of the defaulting party pursuant to subparagraph (e) of this Section, on a 360-day per year basis for the actual number of days daring the period from and including the date of the Event of Default giving rise to such option to but excluding the date of payment of the Repurchase Price as so increased; (iii)all Income Paid after such exercise or deemed exercise shall be retained by the nundefaulting party and applied to the aggregate unpaid Repurchase Prices owed by the defaulting party; and (iv) the defaulting party shall immediately deliver to the nondefaulting party any Purchased Securities subject to such Transactions then in the defaulting parry's possession. (c) In all Transactions in which the defaulting party is acting as Buyer, upon tender by the nondefaulting parry of payment of the aggregate Repurchase Prices for all such 'Transactions, the defaulting Party's right, title and interest in all Purchased Securities subject to such Transactions shall be deemed transferred to the nondefaulting party, and the defaulting party shall deliver all such Purchased Securities to the nondefaulting party. (d) After one business day's notice to the defaulting party (which notice need not be given if an Act of Insolvency shall have occurred, and which may be the notice given under subparagraph (a)of this Section or the notice referred to in clause (ii) of the first sentence of this Section, the nondefaulting party may: (i) as to Transactions in which the defaulting party is acting as Seller, (A)immediately sell, in a recognized market at such price or prices as the nondefaulting parry may reasonably deem satisfactory, any or all Purchased Securities subject to such Transactions and apply the proceeds thereof to the aggregate unpaid Repurchase Prices and any other amounts owing by the defaulting party hereunder, or (B) in its sole discretion elect, in lieu of selling all or a portion of such Purchased Securities, to give the defaulting party credit for such Purchased Securities in an amount equal to the price therefor on such date, obtained from a generally recognizrd source or the most recent closing bid quotation from such a source, against the aggregate unpaid Repurchase Prices and any other amounts owing by the defaulting party hereunder; and nw:saa1900/t1ri3 7 U]-14-SJ {{:4v and rnti6 nuuLnn, (wvusurr, Aran 1'd YoLJnQ ruu.: Ar'! (ii) As to Transactions in which the defaulting party is acting as Buyer, (A) purchase securities ("Replacement Securities") of the same class and amount as any Purchased Securities that are not delivered by the defaulting party to the nondefaulting party as required hereunder, or (B) in its sole discretion elect, in lieu of purchasing Replacement Securities, to be deemed to have purchased Replacement Securities at the price therefor on such date, obtained from a generally-recognized source or the most recent closing bid quotation from such a source. (a) As to Transactions in which the defaulting party is acting as Buyer, the defaulting party shall be liable to the nondefaulting party (i) with respect to Purchased Securities (other than Additional Purchased Securities), for any excess of the price paid (or deemed paid) by the nondefaulting party for Replacement Securities therefor over the Purchase Price for such Purchased Securities; and (ii) with respect to Additional Purchased Securities, for the price paid (or deemed paid) by the nondefaulting party for the Replacement Securities therefor. In addition, the defaulting party shall be liable to the nondefaulting party for interest on such remaining liability with respect to each such purchase (or deemed purchase) of Replacement Securities from the date of such purchase (or deemed purchase) until paid in full by Buyer. Such interest shall be at a rate equal to the greater of the Pricing Rate for such transaction or the Price Rate. (f) For purposes of this Section 11, the Repurchase Price for each Transaction hereunder in respect of which the defaulting party is acting as Buyer shalt not increase above the amount of such Repurchase Price for such Transaction determined as of the date of the exercise or deemed exercise by the nondefaulting party of its option under subparagraph (a) of this Section. (g) The defaulting party shall be liable to the nondefaulting party for the amount of all reasonable legal or other expense incurred by the nondefaulting patty in connection with or as a consequence of an Event of Default, together with interest thereon at a rate equal to the greater of the Pricing Rate for the relevant Transaction or the Prime Rate. (h) The nondefaulting patty shall have, in addition to its rights hereunder, any rights otherwise available to it under any other agreement or applicable law. Section 2: Single Agreement. Buyer and Seller acknowledge that,and have entered hereunto, and will enter into each Transaction hereunder in consideration of and in reliance upon the fact that, all Transactions hereunder constitute a single business and contractual relationship and have been made in consideration of each other. Accordingly, each of Buyer and Seller agrees (i) to perform all of its obligations in respect of each Transaction hereunder, and that a default in the performance of any such obligations shall constitute a default by it in respect of all Transactions hereunder; (ii) that each of them shall be entitled to set off claims and apply property held by them in respect of Transaction against obligations owing to them in respect of any other Transactions hereunder; and (iii) that payments, deliveries and other transfers made by either of them in respect of any Transaction shall be deemed to have been made in nw:�tess�n�ror 8 �"/ uJ'tt'Y] 11::ons: rays, aVuanz, Wuvu:urr, uan ,a y,t,tY7s ru:wtu i 1 consideration of payments, deliveries and other transfers in respect of any other Transactions hereunder, and the obligations to malce any such payments, deliveries and other transfers may be applied against each other and netted. Section 13: Notices and Other Communications. Unless another address is specified in writing by the respective patty to whom any notice or other communication is to he given hereunder, all such notices or communications shall be in writing or confirmed in writing and delivered at the respective addresses set forth in Annex If, attached hereto. Section 14: Entire Agreement: Severabilily. This Agreement shall supersede any existing agreements between the parties containing general terms and conditions for repurchase transactions. Each provision and agreement herein shall be treated as separate and independent from any other provision or agreement herein and shall be enforceable, notwithstanding the unenforeeability of any such other provision or agreement. Section15: NQn--Assienahility: Termination. The rights and obligations of the parties under this Agreement and under any Transaction shall not be assigned by either party without the prior written consent of the other parry. Subject to the foregoing, this Agreement and any Transactions shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit ur the parties and their respective successors and assigns. This Agreement may be cancelled by either party upon giving written notice to the other, except that this Agreement shall, notwithstanding such notice, remain applicable to any Transactions then outstanding. Section I : Governing law. This Agreement shall be governed by the law of the State of California, without giving effect to the conflict of law principles thereof. Section 17: No Waivers, Etc. No express or implied waiver of any Event of Default by either party shall constitute a waiver of any other Event of Default and no exercise of any remedy hereunder by any parry shall constitute a waiver of its right to exercise any other remedy hereunder. No modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement and no consent by any party to a departure herefrom shall be effective unless and until such shall be in writing and duly executed by both of the parties hereto. Without limitation on any of the foregoing, the failure to give a notice pursuant to subparagraphs 4(a) or 4(b)hereof will not constitute a waiver of any right to do so at a later date. Section IS. Use of Emylovee Plan Assets. (a) If assets of an employee benefit plan subject to any provision of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of I R74 ("ERISA") are intended to be used by either party hereto (the "Plan Party") in a Transaction, the Plan Party shall so notify the other parry prior to the Transaction. The Plan Party shall represent in writing to the other party that the Transaction does not constitute a prohibited transaction under ERISA or is otherwise exempt therefrom, and the other party may proceed in reliance thereon but shall not be required so to proceed. nw:rrt'tstavtt,m 9 W'r C'dJ IGieau rava ruu6La, "vv'Jaurr, Jrar. 1v d04Jd3i rJw u:i (b) Subject to the last sentence of subparagraph (a) of this Section, any such Transaction shall proceed only if Seller furnishes or has furnished to Buyer its most recent available audited statement of its financial condition and its most recent subsequent unaudited statement of its financial condition. (c) By entering into a Transaction pursuant to this Section, Seller shall be deemed (i) to represent to Buyer that since the date of Seller's latest such financial statements. there has been no material adverse change in Seller's financial condition which Seller has not disclosed to Buyer; and (ii) to agree to provide Buyer with future audited and unaudited statements of its financial condition as they are issued, so long as it is a Seller in any outstanding Transaction involving a Plan Party. Section 19: Itn=, (a) The parties recognize that each Transaction is a "repurchase agreement" as that term is defined in Section 101 of Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended (except insofar as the type of Securities subject to such Transaction or the term of such Transaction would render such definition inapplicable), and a "securities contract" as that term is defined in Section 741 of Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended. (b) It is understood that either party's right to liquidate securities delivered to it in connection with Transactions hereunder or to exercise any other remedies pursuant to Paragraph 11 hereof, is a contractual right to liquidate such Transaction as described in Sections 555 and 559 of Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended. Section 20: Disclosure Relating to Certain Federal Protccdotm, The parties acknowledge that they have been advised that: (a) In the case of Transactions in which one of the parties is a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") under Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("1934 Act"), the Securities Investor.Protection Corporation has taken the position that the provisions of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 ("SIPA") do not protect the other party with respect to any Transaction hereunder, (b) In the case of Transactions in which one of the parties is a government securities broker or a government securities dealer registered with the SEC under Section 15C of the 1934 Act, SIPA will not provide protection to the other party with respect to any Transaction hereunder; and (c) In the case of Transactions in which one of the parties is a financial institution, funds held by the financial institution pursuant to a Transaction hereunder are not a deposit and therefore are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corpnration, the Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corporation or the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund, as applicable. nwgjl s"11l.sa 10 04-14-$4 i1:40M faux auuiaf„ aVVLaurr, oraA /V 0043034 Section 21: Governing Lbw. The laws of the State of California govern all transactions pursuant to this Agreement. The parties acknowledge that all Purchased Securities shall be lawful for the purpose of govemmental investment by the Buyer and shall be limited as described in Section 22 below. Because Buyer is a governmental entity and is prohibited by applicable law from making loans, the panics hereby (i) agree that all transactions conducted pursuant to this Agreement must be interpreted as purchases and sales of securities; and (ii) expressly reconfirm the provisions of Section 6 of the Agreement. Scoligp..22: Permissible Purchased Securities. Only those investments, as described in California Government Code Section 53601, may be Purchased Securities pursuant to this Agreement. Section 23: Seller's Financial Condition. (a) Seller shall maintain compliance with applicable federal regulatory standards and guidelines regarding capital adequacy and net capitalization. (b) Any transaction undertaken pursuant to this Agreement shall proceed only if Seller furnishes or has furnished to Buyer its most oxen available audited statement of financial condition and its most recent subsequent unaudited statements of financial condition. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Seller fails to furnish its most recent audited and/or unaudited financial statements, the Buyer shall provide written notice to the Seller of such failure, and the Seller must provide the appropriate financial statements within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of such notice. (e) By entering into a transaction pursuant to this Agreement, Seller shall be deemed to represent to Buyer that since the date of Seller's latest financial statements, there has been no material adverse change in Seller's financial condition which Seller has not disclosed in writing to Buyer, and Seller further agrees to provide Buyer with future audited and unaudited statements of financial condition as they are issued. Section-24: pgliverv. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7, all transactions shall be accomplished through "delivery vs. payment", unless the parties otherwise agree prior to the transfer of funds. Section 25: Milgrgin Ratios. Unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties to the transaction, for purposes of calculating the margin amount, the following ratios shall be applied daily to the market value of Purchased Securities, depending on their maturity: Maturity of U.S. Agency Purchased U.S. Treasury Discount and Securities Securities Coupon Securities 1 - 5 years 102% 102% rvw,glnsswrntro) 11 9J'!L"JJ 11,4Jxm rnva auu:nn, nucurtur r. ,rn; i,� y0[.ty�4 Ie:J/Uifl �. i section 6: Margin Maintenance. For term repurchase agreements, a custodian of the Seller shall maintain the required margin amount, or the required margin ratios shall be increased as mutually agreed in writing to compensate for possible market price losses or gains. If the dealer does not mark daily, the margin ratios shall be increased. Section 27; Authorized Personnel. Only those persons identified below may execute transactions pursuant to this Agreement. These signatories are those who are legally authorized to sign by Resolution of the appropriate governing body or by corporate Ordinance. Section 28: Conflict. In the event of a conflict between this Master Repurchase Agreement and Annex I or Annex 11, the Annex shall prevail over the inconsistent portion of the Master Repurchase Agreement. In the event of a conflict between Annex I and Annex II, Annex I shall prevail. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. I OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and Id of Orange County, California By I. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager By Districts' Tr=urer APPROVED AS TO FORM: THOMAS L. WOODRUFF DISTRICT COUNSEL By MERRILL LYNCH GOVERNMENT SECURITIES, INC. By Its By Its nw:nm+»vnvn 12 AUVAAC. VVVL'L jr,. Jr la LV y04J70q tMiV10 7 l� w1P` ANNEX I SUPPLEMENTAL PROVMONS TO MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT THESE SUPPLEMENTAL PROVISIONS TO MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT are made and entered into, to be effective this _ day of , 1993, by and between: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, Wilornia, hereinafter referred to as "Buyer"; AND MERRILL LYNCH GOVERNMENT SECURITIES INC., hereinafter referred to as "Seller". WITNESSETH; The parties hereto agree that, notwithstanding any prior agreements between them, the following terms and conditions shall govern all transactions hereafter entered into between them in which one party ("Seller') agrees to transfer to the other ("Buyer") securities or financial instruments ("Securities")against the transfer of funds by Buyer, with a simultaneous agreement by Buyer to transfer to Seller such Securities at a date certain or on demand, against the transfer of funds by Seller (each such transaction referred to herein as a "Transaction"): Section 1: Disclosure Relatine to Certain Federal Protections. The parties acknowledge that they have been advised that: (a) In the case of Transactions in which one of the parties is a broker or dealer registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") under Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("1934 Act"), the Securities Investor Protection Corporation has taken the position that the provisions of the Securities Invcstur Protection Act of 1970 ("SIPA") do not protect the other party with respect to any transaction hereunder; (b) In the case of Transactions in which one of the parties is a government securities broker or a government securities dealer registered with the SEC under Section 15C of the 1934 Act, SIPA will not provide protection to the other party with respect to any Transaction hereunder; and rLW:OI(a5!)Oltlgi 1 UJ-IL-DJ IIYVt.� tAvr :vviuA, nvwAv::, J(An wAUAJOJ� �._. ..,, (c) In the case of Transactions in which one of the parties is a financial institution, funds held by the financial institution pursuant to a Transaction hereunder are not a deposit and therefore are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation or the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund, as applicable. Section 2: Transfer. As used herein, and in any prior agreement between the parties with respect to Transactions hereunder, "transfer" is intended to have the same meaning as when used in Section 8313 of the California Uniform Commercial Code, or where applicable, in any federal regulation governing transfer of the Securities. Section 3: Stg "m anon. Seller shall be required to segregate purchased Securities in its possession from other securities in its possession and to identify such Purchased Securities as subject to this Agreement(and any prim agreement between the parties with respect to any Transactions hereunder), solely to the extent that such segregation and identification are required by applicable law or to effect validly a transfer hereunder. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and to of Orange County, California By_. I. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager By Districts' Treasurer APPROVED AS TO FORM: TROMAS L. WOODRUFF DISTRICT COUNSEL By MERRILL LYNCH GOVERNMENT SECURITIES INC. By its By Iu . Vu ♦/� w'•I t!•fJ114 •euw ,., .mu✓YJuw,.tl •J •IVLJJJt 1VlV/ VIV i ANNEX II NAMES AND ADDRESSES FOR COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN PARTIES For; County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 108" Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, Ca. 92728-8127 Attn.: For: Merrill Lynch Government Securities Inc. World Financial Center - North Tower New York, New York 10281-11308 Atm.: TL1V:Plt���11W ( i March 11, 1993 18-MONTH PROGRAM PERFORMANCE ASSUMPTIONS DATE ACTION ISSUE COUPON/MATURITY PRICE 9/3/91 PURCHASE $50 MILLION TREASURY 7.25 8/31/96 100.00% 9/3/91 REV REPO $50 MILLON TREASURY 7.25 8/31/96 5.65% ANALYSIS (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) QUARTER CSDOC CSDOC PROFIT CSDOC ENDING TREA COUPON REV REPO REV REPO THIS CUMULATIVE DATE EARNINGS RATE PAID INT EXPENSE QUARTER PROFIT (B-D) 11/30/91 $876,373.63 5.65 $685,376.39 $190,997.24 $190,997.24 02/29/92 $906,250.00 4.80 $602,116.67 $304,133.33 $495,130.57 05/31/92 $906,250.00 4.10 $519,959.72 $386,290.28 $881,420.85 08/31/92 $906,250.00 3.90 $494,595.83 $411,654.17 $1,293,075.02 11/30/92 $911,256.90 3.40 $426,499.31 $484,757.59 $1,777,832.61 02/28/93 $901,243.09 3.45 $428,015.63 $473,227.47 $2,251,060.08 05/31/93 $906,250.00 3.30 $418,504.17 $487,745.83 $2,738,805.90 KRCAMDOCS\FMMTG\PEV .CHT KPMG- Peat Marwick cenified Public Accountants Orange County Office Telephone 714 850 4300 Telelac 714 85D 4488 Center Tower 650 Town Center Drive Costa Mesa, CA 92626 March 10, 1993 Ms.Patricia Gorczyca Orange County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 Dear Patti: It was a pleasure meeting with you, Gary Stteed and Dan Dillon last week to discuss your proposed new investment policy. As you have recognized, an important aspect of implementing the policy is providing appropriate internal controls over investment transactions to reduce the risk of losses of public funds. Some of the key internal control elements,which should be documented in a formal written policy,include: • Control of collusion • Separation of dudes • Separating transaction authority from accounting and recordkeeping • Custodial safekeeping • Clear designation of authority • Written confirmation of telephone transactions • Minimizing the number of authorized investment officials • Documentation of transactions and strategies • Review of contracts and agreements by legal counsel I have enclosed for your reference a copy of the"Investment Portfolio Guidelines"used by the City of Orange. The sections on evaluating and authorizing institutions, telephone wire transfers and safekeeping should be of particular interest. KPMG Peat Marwick Ms.Patricia Gorcryca March 10, 1993 Page 2 I have also enclosed a sample"Legal Investment Report"farm. A form such as this should be completed for each investment to ensure that the investment is suitable under the Districts' investment policy and applicable laws. The form should be approved by the investment manager prior to initiating any investment transactions. I hope this information is helpful. Please call me if you have any questions of if I can be of further assistance. Very mdy yours, KPMG PEAT MARWICK Steven L. Sardegna Senior Manager SLS:gv Enc. - COUNTY SANITATION DImius d of ORANGE COUNTY. CAOFORNIA 108 A ews Av Nue PO BOX W27 March 10, 1993 r WCN VALar.c MRNiA 9272"127 tf STAFF REPORT Self-Funded Health Plan Overview During a recent review of the Self-Funded Health Plan budget and costs, the Committee asked staff for additional information. The Directors expressed concern over the rate of expenditures compared to the budget and what cost containment practices were in effect. The budget recommended by staff and approved by the Boards for 1992-93 was for a total of $1,577,000 for self-funded medical and dental claims. This recommendation was a decrease from the 1991-92 budget amount of $2,031,000. The claims reduction experienced during the three quarters prior to the budget preparation that caused us to (ewer our 1992-93 projection was attributed to changes in the mix of employees in the fund, increased premium co- payments by employees, and other cost containment measures. However, we now know that a substantial amount of fourth quarter claims caused the budget recommendation for 1992-93 to be too low. Use of 12-month data for the 1991-92 costs have resulted in a recommended budget of $2,077,000, an increase of $500,000. Had this been the adopted budget, costs for the first six months of 1992-93 would be 61 % of the budget allocation. The Districts offer two prepaid health maintenance organization (HMO) health insurance plans also. Of the current 610 employees and retirees insured, 199 are covered by an HMO and 411 participate in the self-funded plan. About half of those in the self-funded plan are individuals only, from whom no premium is collected. Two-party and family coverages require a premium contribution from the employee approximately equal to their premium for HMO coverage. The Districts utilize the services of Association Administrators and Consultants (AA&C) for third-party administration of the indemnity health coverage. The Districts' self-funded group health plan is backed up by stop loss coverage with Anthem Life Insurance Company. There is a specific cap of $75,000 per claim, an annual aggregate cap of approximately $3,000,000, and a stop loss maximum reimbursement of $1 ,000,000. r ' U Self-Funded Health Plan Overview Page 2 March 10, 1993 As a part of this program, the Districts offer the American Health Network of Preferred Provider Organizations (PPO). Employees are encouraged to utilize both PPO physicians and hospitals in the plan by waiving the medical care deductible for all charges from a PPO provider and by paying 90% of the covered charge, rather than 80%. Utilization management analysis is now performed by Anthem Health Systems, Incorporated, in association with the PPO network. Their services include preadmission screening, continued stay review, discharge planning, various review procedures, and ongoing case management. As a result of this intensive process, PPO utilization has increased from 49% to 62% in the last year, and the average hospital stay has decreased from 4.8 to 3.9 days. AA&C also performs case management activities with regard to both hospital charges and injuries or illnesses resulting in multiple treatment expenses. Prescription drug coverage is now provided through Pharmaceutical Card System, with the employee paying $7 for each generic prescription, and $10 for brand- name prescriptions. The Districts are billed at wholesale cost for the balance, plus an administrative fee. This program appears to be cutting our prescription related costs approximately 10%. For the first six months, the cost for full family coverage under the indemnity program is approximately $850 per month. Effective July 1, 1993, the employees' share of this cost will be $160.00. Employees who have HMO coverage with Kaiser will pay about $149 per month, and those with FHP will pay about $163. The long-term intent is to encourage participation in HMO plans, as they represent a less costly benefit. Annual increases in employee contribution rates were negotiated for the first time in 1990 in pursuit of that goal. Workers' Compensation cases are aggressively managed by a third-party administrator, Keenan and Associates. Keenan has a cost containment program that reviews all medical expenses resulting from Workers' Compensation cases. The audit of such charges resulted in a savings of $16,000 in 1992, which represented a 22% savings increase over the prior year. In addition, the Districts have adopted avery aggressive position with regard to the acceptance and settlement of Workers' Compensation claims. The Districts also have a proactive safety program designed to reduce the frequency and severity of accidents. As a result of all of these efforts, our costs associated with Workers' Compensation claims are a fraction of the amount spent on a per capita basis by other large sanitation districts. r r.. Self-Funded Health Plan Overview Page 3 March 10, 1993 - Most health care cost containment initiatives focus on a plan design elements, including alternate delivery systems, flexible benefits and managed care. Of these, the Districts are currently utilizing HMO health services and performing managed care activities through our third-party administrators. With respect to the remaining area, flexible benefits, we are currently working with our broker-of- record, Robert F. Driver Company, to determine if it has merit for consideration in negotiations with employee groups this fall when current MOU's expire. GGS:lc REF:CA P00CS%RC.W01SRFPC3.11e COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Information for: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE Regarding: Strategies for Managing a Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate Swap Program March 17, 1993 Merrill Lynch & Co. PaineWebber Incorporated COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE March 17, 1993 Strategies for Managing a Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate Swap Program Table of Contents CURRENT OBJECTIVES A CURRENT MARKET ENVIRONMENT B INTEREST RATE SWAP MECHANICS C ADDITIONAL ISSUES D FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION E H ld H H H [ H H H f F H H H H H fl l � E fl CURRENT OBJECTIVES t t( t t t t t t a /� t t t t t t tl F e CURRENT OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVES OF A FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP PROGRAM • Opportunity to Reduce Current Fixed Rate Interest Costs • Maintain Current Attractive Variable Rate Financing Program • Maintain or Strengthen Districts' Credit Rating • Design a Swap Program Which Can Be Managed in Changing Interest Rate Environments County Sanitation Districts of Orange County l CURRENT MARKET ENVIRONMENT CURRENT MARKET ENVIRONMENT TEN YEAR FIXED-TO-FLOATING SWAP RATE Vs. J.J. KENNY INDEX (03/08/88 - 03/08/93) s . . . . . . . . . s a6 - - - - - - - - U N a A v 4 - -- y d a y 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - w 0 03/08/88 05/02/89 06/26/90 08/20/91 03/08/93 —J.J. Kenny Index 10 Ye1r FXR Current Interest Rate Environment is Lowest in 16 Years. County Sanitation Disvicts of Orange County 2 V CURRENT MARKET ENVIRONMENT SPREAD BETWEEN TEN YEAR FIXED RECEIVOR SWAP RATE and J.J. KENNY INDEX (03/08/88 - 03/08/93) 4 - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . s N d N U y N 9 N y N I C1. W m N A 0 wvv fx _1 03/08/88 03/28/89 04/17/90 05/07/91 03/08/93 Current Yield Curve is Historically Steep. County Sanitarian Districts of Orange County 3 INTEREST RATE SWAP MECHANICS INTEREST RATE SWAP MECHANICS BENEFITS OF FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP • Converts a Portion of Fixed Rate Debt to Floating Rate Debt • Immediate Reduction in Debt Service Provides Lower All-In Interest Cost • Swap Program is Easily Implemented with Execution Immediately Following Approval by Districts • Ability to Garner Additional Savings with Swap Restructuring or Reversal • No Put Risk, Remarketing Fees, or Letter of Credit Associated with Traditional Floating Rate Debt County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 4 i INTEREST RATE SWAP MECHANICS FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP STRUCTURE Fixed Payment (%) Fixed Receivor Rate I CSDOC MERRILL LYNCH Variable Payment(%) d.J. Kenny Index FIXED RATE BONDHOLDERS Country Sanitation Districts of Orange County 5 INTEREST RATE SWAP MECHANICS INTEREST RATE SWAP PRICING (FIXED RECEIVOR RATES as of 03/08/9a) MATURITY FIXED RECEIVOR YEARS) RATE 1 2.53% 2 2.88% 3 3.23% 5 3.78% 7 4.04% 10 4.28% County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 6 Il I a t I I I I I I Il I t INTEREST RATE SWAP MECHANICS FIXED-TO-FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP YIELD CURVE (Fixed Receivor Rates as of 03/08/93) 5 s 4 . . _ . . . . . . - . . � [,,,Fixed Receivor Rates p Profit* 3 2 u" J.J. Kenny as or 03/02/93 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 *Assuming Current JJ Kenny Term of Swap (Years) County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 7 INTEREST RATE SWAP MECHANICS EXPECTED SAVINGS ON TEN YEAR SWAP ASSUMED AVG. PRESENT VALUE OF J.J. KENNY POTENTIAL OVER 10YEARS PROFIT 1.00% $45,154,956 1.87%(1) 33,177,879 2.00% 31,388,201 2.50% 24,504,824 3.00% 17,621,446 3.50% 10,738,069 4.00% 3,854,691 4.28%(2) 0 4.50% (3,028,686) (1)Current JJK Index (2)Current 10 Year Fmd Becemor Rate HISTORY OF SHORT-TERM RATES (Average J.J. Kenny to March 8, 1993) 01/01/93 to Date: 2.06% 01/01/92 to Date: 2.71% 01/01/91 to Date: 3.51% 01/01/90 to Date: 4.27% 01/01/89 to Date: 4.80% 01/01/88 to Date: 4.91% County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 8 ADDITIONAL ISSUES C � � ADDITIONAL ISSUES RATING AGENCY CONCERNS • Amount of Variable Rate Debt Outstanding and Associated Floating Rate Exposure • Final Maturity of Variable Rate Debt • Ability of Districts to Withstand "Worst Case Scenarios" (i.e. counterparty default, rising floating rates, etc.) METHODS OF MITIGATING RATING AGENCY CONCERNS • Application of Interest Rate Cap to Currently Outstanding Variable Rate Debt • Shorten Maturity of Swap • Base Swap on Smaller Notional Amount County Sanitation Districts ofOmnge County 9 ADDITIONAL ISSUES ADDITIONAL INTEREST RATE SWAP MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES • Upfront Reversal - Locks in Guaranteed Profit for Term as Determined by Districts • Swap Extension - Benefits Districts in Rising Interest Rate Environment • Swap Reversal - Similar to Transaction Implemented in November - Benefits Districts in Falling Interest Rate Environment County Sanitation Districts of Omnge County 10 FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDED ACTIONS • Authorize Merrill Lynch/PaineWebber to Serve as Interest Rate Swap Bankers • Direct Staff and Swap Banking Team to Obtain Guidance from Rating Agencies Regarding Swap Structure and Terms • Direct Staff to Report Back to Fiscal Policy Committee in April With Recommended Swap Structure and Implementation Plan County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 11 ( l � COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Information for: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE Regarding: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 1990-92 SERIES B 1993 Advance Refunding Analyses March 17, 1993 I [ I I I C I �" t [ I I I l I � I I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Information for: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE Regarding: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 1990-92 SERIES B 1993 Advance Refunding Analyses March 17, 1993 l [ [ [ ! t l t t [ l l [ I SERIES B ADVANCE REFUNDING STRUCTURING ALTERNATIVES • Traditional Fixed Rate Advance Refunding • Inverse Floater Derivative Products - (To Achieve Additional Interest Savings) • Synthetic Fixed Rate Advance Refunding (Similar to 1992 Advance Refunding Structure) • State Revolving Fund Opportunities - (Could Apply to Either 2007 or 2016 Term of Series B) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Capital Improvement Program - 1990-92 SERIES B 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation Rates as of 03/08/93 TRADITIONAL FIXED RATE ADVANCE REFUNDING STRUCTURE CURRENT MKT CURRENT MKT as of 03/08/93 LESS 47 BP PAR AMOUNT $56,300,000 $58,070,000 GROSS SAVINGS $615,081 $2,501,145 PV SAVINGS % 0.776% 3.000% ARBITRAGE TIC 5.306% 4.825% AVG. ANNUAL SAVINGS $26,174 $106,432 E t I I I I E COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Capital Improvement Program - 1990-92 SERIES B 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation Rates as of 03/08/93 TRADITIONAL REFUNDING STRUCTURE w/ INVERSE FLOATERS CURRENT MKT CURRENT MKT as of 03/08/93 LESS 40 BP PAR AMOUNT $56,510,000 $58,020,000 GROSS SAVINGS $843,424 $2,466,590 PV SAVINGS % 1.034% 3.000% ARBITRAGE TIC 5.248% 4.837% "G. ANNUAL SAVINGS $35,890 $104,961 I I I I I I t l ( ° I I I I I I I I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Capital Improvement Program - 1990-92 SERIES B 1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation Rates as of 03/08/93 SYNTHETIC FIXED RATE ADVANCE REFUNDING STRUCTURE CURRENT MKT CURRENT MKT as of 03/08/93 LESS 32 BP PAR AMOUNT $56,855,000 $58,050,000 GROSS SAVINGS $1,215,584 $2,486,206 PV SAVINGS % 1.472% 3.000% ARBITRAGE TIC 5.153% 4.830% AVG. ANNUAL SAVINGS $51,727 $105,796 [ [ I a a a [ a a a [ [ a a a a [ [ FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ACTIONS • Direct Staff and Finance Team to Take Necessary Steps to Proceed with Advance Refunding of Remaining Series B Obligations • Direct Staff to Implement Advance Refunding Should Prevailing Market Rates Achieve 3.00% Target Savings Level • Direct Staff to Proceed with Most Cost Effective Financing Structure to Achieve Target Savings Level • Direct Staff to Report on Status of Market Conditions and Advance Refunding at Next Fiscal Policy Committee l l l 1 [ l 1 l [ i l l l [ 1 1 l ` [ 1 RIERRIU.LYNCN6Cll. OKYI) PAGE I Cumry fumnGOW 4QpeCaury Ttlimrl AOruv RefOf CImpwvmlPyu�ImOK5aa0 C'rmmlMWb f%JnK01»)ReOotliif Ce06en Mheeluim frOelJe l:CmiOietfo llhe fOWCFbIUbYGifUHDe REi DINGCA MMWINigI M)fl fvnm OseaJq ilm�Fs. Tdtl Cavuy NOm oiOYye Cfm�g WAmwrt UYPp]0 n 1 o 0 sln. fnnO.e sw. OnpwamvPe/wpq».hpC ilsil®oflel Demur e 1 sssAOoceeOow M� Aarown o e I e aJmtl»I lh. AW lAA— 0 e 1 e ,9f Re0vW1. Mimi RbvM l»I�—I R-6n, 0 0 0 CN 61e P»MI 0.ebWI»I0.mreiW BWne: 41Rj11 01 131Y11 GORve IU00m4 TOW. w4w7l p 1 M.W7. TaW hAwmI ReOUWd'. Ulpnp00 1 I»f F—I pJIWf %T.eim�J. MU»f ue I I Pmw OmJbR<evWy4VA. 41A,f]I RNMyEuwDepeb. P4nlns P I s)Y)U» C.aspe4 Moll; I SPAT lailmw. npeP e I IPPP Dmo•RofAmvGeRvai. 0 • I 0 DdifmJaRm�e AymO. YVil f I xw I"111 `nve ehemue. n 0 I 3)I0 - RawMf ;Ttl e I 11n SAYING6MULYUf Tmtl We ygAj11 P I f1e.1W11 ^ - OmNRMIfr fuse% TMUw Swy Wiwi Td i,—VJut Awys W00/Ib gnm'e Fwtl MluYmmi 0 Nn Tatl Peml VJie Swya � {—N,W DNAN[MG DATES iV Swede%of Refetlelh Olnpi 0.m Ug09J pLvnal MIMI iw Oma. PqN) Fw R W g1 F. sOmOb Ines. ONDP Peuu FINANCMG INWR Mll - A Tne0mal. f10WN Ae bTe%IneW: 141M pn RameFmti f411f)11 I.b0un0u01EFmd 0.flflf W l Al IOe�� umle �le 1()0 1 C 1 1 1 1 L [ I , [ [ l L [ [ [ 1 I 9(E91N11TNLT1•m. o1ABA) cawT smm Ix,wu aomB�cawr Cquul l^Y^'®Pag®191U933aie 6 s54J W.W0199I SI 2adR Cw6ow a Rniiryen 3da.Ya x:9afim6vq MM Beniu Turd NmW I OwuudW S.J056% swl sael Tad DdrBnlu I u6r aoa IMmw PV We IWa Yidd Isiee PvrPl loam Odr Sawa Na Amd I Sev+e Swilar F. Snv® 1 - 1 Olgl% 225U% 1250% IOO WO iS.OW ]]6,15J 17I.I13 ))LIA )99.'3) 28.111 09869N 11,115 3 O2A1% 1,151,199 1.714 9 096 11 1100]] WN191 E.500% 250W4 IMOW ffi,000 1.151.199 I114]99 I.16n.59n 3.191.05) Rp55 09124 (110.779) 1 W m L. q, I,W,g6 091N)6 114902 5 f&01% J]OW JNg1{ IWOW 315.OW I...m I.)D.M ),1]1.9]J 3,19],05) ES,WO 000W (111,0]2) 6 OYDI% I,g m I,M;W6 0863510 ot" WNI% LfQM JSOINi IWOW AIS.OW I.HI.W6 1,]39.086 ),I TJ.1]) 1,191,0A 2]ABU 081J519 1110,1291 9 02AIA] I,439.099 9 .. , , 1 . O..n3T53 1JI,.pN ].tMi Jn0011 100.0 2 .0 9 IJAM ).1]3.IW 3.9>,053 33,855 OBUd]) IIW.R 5 1 10 GVDIB 1.433. W I , I O]]991 1 11 WUI% 10K 100W I .OW I.03.g1 1.lxW 3.I71.Y I 1.19),W) I.WS 5 106.3151 13 OVOIM1/E], IADd8 07N IM6 13 0&'Ol LEW IIM IWOW )IS.OW IA2],319 1. ;3I3 I16.615 ).19].053 21,118 07 (103.657) 11 OIA00 I164 621 0 7022% 12;Wl 15 OnW14?000 LIM 1M IWOW 330.000 I.4n I.M.631 J.19].OS] 25& 0680W 0d105 16 WA14001 1,113. i IA1J,91 13)As3 Il WAIIA01 1. % 1U IWO NS, W 1 1 3,171,363 I 3910)] 25, p 06,9m (IW. 19 O f 1.,05.3.6 1.403 06)2g1 III,173 19 WR`03W UM UA IWW LbS. W 5,M3. 6A95.W) 6,9^,OS) E6.X 0616W] I ) 0 oEAIM 1. g323 I 06W1% 1.. 21 WAI11003 lnµ I.BM IW.O 1,E75.000 I.Ib.J_^B S.SBI.)EB 6.81.655 1 6.919,2b 21515 0. , WAS" 23 0 1/lOd 1.2d659 I.Hb59 I wo .5.145 23 W 19µ 1.9M IWW 1,413. W 1, d.65 5.689.659 69 ,)In I 6,921,1A 24n03 0.SW29 (0.7 2 QVOI4 1655 I,W3655 I 05Id91 42 2S 08?01W SOA SON IWW 4.7I0.000 1.03,655 5.803,65 489].)10 I 6.T.Po 2;37o OSWb Ki3s 26 03`0I/1006 91U28 914728 I 0512911 5;)d 27 0S01/2006 S.ISOK S.ISW{ IW000 1.915,OOD M7.M 5.M.. 4991,155 1 4919,WA 35.305 0199663 I37.115 30 Otooino0] w].391 e11,J91 I 0g6150 2],])s M WAIROd 530'M f30M IOO.OW 1.3W.W0 oot 6,052JW 6,n99.]q I 6.935.000 35,313 O.g11]1 I2;tlN1 IO 0101/11169 Moot Illo$tis'.. 0161918 JS)JJ JI WAI/'AN SENA s.250% IOO.OW ]$,WO 11"S ]8).0N 1.193.12n I.s2s.zW z4d) 0119381 23.016 3E U1014 )14W5 M.W5 042704 11.U16 31 o2volmW S.2NA S.I10% IW.UW BO,OW 110W5 190.W5 1.500.190 I I.szs.'AD 25,010 012]O±i 122.132 31 0`A@010 101,935 7n955 I 0.4239 2..1 35 0n01/A10 5150% SISO% 100.000 BS.00D ]d.639 10%639 I.SW.910 1 1,5+3,E00 EL'9J 03N7 9 122.46 M 0101/1011 )W,639 MAY) I 0.3d]W .2.1. 31 0&01/2011 SISD% SJSO% IOO,ODJ 9000D 70,639 )95,W9 1,501,219 IS'_S.q] 33.923 0381565 113.]dl )8 OL01/3013 1W,IB6 )0),186 1 036046 .2..7 N (WI/1W3 51n0% SJ10% IW.OW 95,OW MM.Im.5% l9n,ln6 1,501,)1] I.S25.Np 23Rffi OWSIS 1221.11 1D U 14?01) ms" Boom 0355515 33!.0 11 MIA013 Slb% SlY3% IMWO IW,WO W.SW BW.SA 1,501.195 1,525.20D 3J,OD5 03M121 I21.83. 43 OEAV20H 69).81J 01.871 I o.U]J]] 9.n38 q WA1Qg1 5150% SRUM IOSOW BRA.WD W].nA 8.]e].0]) 9.g5]45 1 9.5I0.200 2J,155 033639 I14,&0 N OEA1MIS 1)],1$0 J11,420 I OJ201W II,NN 15 OVOLM15 Sq0% Sq0% IOO.OW B,S10,00J 2".W0 9,W4.979 9.q;810 1 9,5I I.IW 243W 03olM 14d11 W 00`01 o16 2N9)n 211.91n OMM 1.329 Il Wg14016 AISO% S110% 50000p 8,9A,OW IK918 9.3)1.9]8 9,119.955 1 9,YW,Np ]n.z15 Oz95WD 1.220 I M.100.OW 441.6NA155 I04,97QJ53 Id,91055 1 IOS.SB51M 615,00I 400.6N1 [ f f 1 1 t [ ( l ( ( [ F9AIR03.LY m&m.. O 3 PME3 Co 9 =U Maol CaWy CWiW Impwaeev fltgw 199092 Sme B t541W.00D 19➢)RefudLBCm�fiduefPeluiptlim Stl1e6Ws3: RNutle6Cdl Snvi¢ 91maN TOM L106 Pra RQim6e6 h6aW Td Td 1 OM193 SOWN M.m )99,M3 M.M) 2 OMIM 1.5965M I'm.m m m 5250R 1,591.526 C591.5M 3.197.03 6 OMINS I,S91,SM 1,591.SM S OMIN5 SAWN I,SW.SM 1.5965M 3.10.033 6 0]p1.96 1.S96.SM 1,596.SM T OM196 3.fi00N OWNS I,SM,5M 3.197.033 1 OMIM I.MSM 1.m5M 10 OMIM 5M014 I.MSM 1.393.526 1,192.031 11 OMIM 590053 1,596SM 1.591.SM 3.197.053 12 OMIA9 I.MSM 1.591,326 13 OMIA9 6W0% 1.591.5M 1.591.3M 3.197.053 I6 OMIy2000 1.39y5M I}965M IS 0091/ 6.IWN LM5M 1.SW.SM 3.1W.053 16 ON= 1.WSM 1.591.SM 19 mlV j 6.2M I.518.526 1."I.SM 1.193p3 IB O IV 2 1.M526 1.591,SM 19 0841 O2 6250N 1.92MW 1.3965M 5,321.SM 6,T_2,03 M O2 lI 3 1.4,1M 116111M 21 OM140W 6.60055 31955.OW 1A111M 3A33.IM 6.919.260 22 OYOVMM 1.355.M 1,355,560 23 OMl2 63WN A21%M 1,355.SW 5.M5.W 6921.IM 25 OM1/MOS I=M 1.2M.W 25 O 1 3 6.6WN 6.6MOW 1.220.1M S.M w 6,921,610 M OM122006 1,OP,60 1.021.610 22 O 1V 61M 1.30AW 1.035,6W S.8R,410 6919.9W 21 MMI/ 7 W5.W0 935AW A OM12W7 610VA 5.015.W0 9M.OW 6.OWOW 6,925.OW M OM122W1 M16W M16W 31 OMI M01 0.000N 0 M;600 M2 1,525.M0 32 OMI/20W M16W M1." 33 OMll 0000N 0 M16W mm 1}25.m H OM1/2010 M;6O0 M;6W 35 OM1R010 0.000N 0 M16W MM600 1.525,200 M 0M11M11 762.60U 261600 33 OMI/3011 0.000N 0 M26W M26W 1.S2312W 30 OMI/M12 M16W M16W N 0M1/M12 000014 0 mw 3616W 1.$25,200 00 OMIM13 7616M 3616W 61 OMI/M1) 000015 0 M1600 7616W 1.525.M0 62 OMIM16 M16W 362,6W 11 OMIIMI6 6000N 2."5.W0 M2. W 1,263,6W 9,510.2W N OMIIMI5 Mom 523.OM 65 OMIM15 6(XAM 1.665.OW S23,0511 1,91S.050 9,511.IW 65 OMIM16 m..IW M9.IW 63 OMIM16 6WDN 1,9M.W0 M..IW 9,239,IW 9,501,MB S1,6M,OW 33.9551636 105,515,6M 10.595.616 I t t MMRJU LY�A M PAM I C"��a�� cmWID'. '. IPVQM�a WMOXIMR,Rwamc�orp� E— [)—D D". 1. lt� F. I D"'M 0 0 ..t M.I 0. MWI 2 .:m I MIX 1.M:26 .Im I ODOM 0 I.-MIN 'M . ,.I :::,. OVOM m MI 09174M MI MIX 0 :.4A5S3 3 GO'D 41 ::"m :: X 3811157 A"At =m M5. .M, DID= 1.,W 7 01,01mm IM526 1IM'mm ."U'D 1:3.km 41 MINI SID ON1712 311.1. 9 000 a? ::I'm ;:Mm:,m 0�77 :::t"m 1.MIN m I" .1�91 LMI�l MI-, ::=5X a739600 OWN :2 0 0 IN MIN .92 :3 m :2KI" ::Msm 0= 4 02,04NOOD 0 0 IMIU IMw .1,11% " = 1.MIN MIX owim 1.091.565 :,6 02,01*001 0 0 MIX IM526 =1 1.02.600 M'. M.261.1m :98 02,04HOD 0 0 0 :63243L 0 0 0 616011' 0 0 .601. 0 21 .4DD) I&,6X 0 22 OPOn 0 0 0 0.1. n .:= 0 DD' 7. owl'MI 0 0 0 0 0 11 nm 0 0 0 0 'Us. 0 X m,`H,D6 a a 0 1 12917 1 27 .,,D 04 0 IS =aODS 0 0 9Xt62 0 0 04 OPOI 0 0 0 SO '"'D 1.;" 0 DUDI't"I 0 a 0 It 010(t] 0 0 0 �61918 0 32 02,01'"'D 0 0 0 33 DIXI 0 04M2 '"D` III" 1. mi"D 0 1 0 o.t5969 0 0 0 m I, ...:o 0 0 0.1. m on= 0 0 0 37 m m: 0 0 0 0 IS m:m 2 0 a 0 :Zml 0 39 DADO :2 0 0 0 0 DVOM3 I a 03,151, 0 .1 =:) 0 a 03463 12 m mi. 0 0 0 0 .,3732 ,3 =14 G :, ...5 0. :;m;I OlV0=5 0 2W 0 0 Ism 0 0 0 03 17 =m 0 0 0 'I'momo I.Otm 26.371.603 W.Min 11.132.391 ca t t( t t t t t t t �' t t t t t t t t MEARILLLMCHAM Y1WNl ME Camry Svtlh4m Lbpi4dOuye CavYy I-47Rl C� A6 WE. C4+W Ralae�miml Hgvn IF3M1T.SmnB Cimml Mu1u W tiR0AW019AReF�NryCCtllulsdMlYiptlm StlWJV I:('am%iMSaw61Y SdIR &tJ4lYw"w RFNINDIW C.WDIDATE INFO0.N . swum: Rd d, 6aFRe¢ TaM Camry4wYvm PWiN ofPuyv Camry Frt AmmiC 1$0'AAT " I FMpW Capd Mpo�miml WaWY41MIE91.5eiaC bif®w/Ir Dsmw[ 0 01 0 FII1.f1f,OTCae6meofFuhpOul Aauu.aswec a o I o RdsW If911aleeMAemvYAmual e o 1 e %dhvs R<6vd# a910K 0.tleN 1»I flE�ylAvpN ArnYI e o 1 o G4 We'. FROINI RtleM IMI Re�me MNBNn¢: k1$n1 o I 41AJT GO Wim: IOIROM/ Taalamm 1®ieTl 1R W,]YJII Tdtl Nt AmaW ReflvWl Ff1,61gDD IW1R.F. Nil;bxf %Tuufmal YF34% I R.Ca .Rafiutlhy COH. k.m7l ReRamWEaoo.upm: iflpl.MF >E I ssr,reaala um.mRsp.o: MM) IFµW o I Ml,ln comdlumm o I IW,W] DepmoFAmueONbaL DaW 3 eauv 0.al5®mw: Drywt o No I0 9" 0 II .113 R.-W{ µF 1w11a1 annNas AHALrsIs Trollb Fg1yT m I 162.2tl]11 —_ p RWt , lva T�. Fx,fllLlaf TUJReml vYuesmp: s1.sT.990 Rueae Fie Ae��mmn: o Na TdR Weml VWs3awP: _—_•••sun9M M"CMODAM PV Sa.cpa%af0.aERtldW losfl]% ow MOM Rlnvet. mm r Eu� eaolM am. Bn MADM Fmt ReLaStl LweL M YUMuay fLOI/IF FMANCMO MN0.NATION NWnFe Tne Nleel 4Mx A0.NThS MeeD: 4.. 19f1 ReweFbvl WT 71 IA r®$aa6: owl 4emurt Nmwmr. OM A,W: 16.IY 1m19w.;tt2cx s.w Wro9)93 la.ci sNeMIN o:leB.aw.9r o.nq oV+A mP19.Nm vmm®199n9;s.0 e W.Waaoo 1%)w6wnc.1a9M�aP.nem1]�9B si,w1.2 9dm61p0eq 9B.iw TaJa I aOWMN 183N 9vs1 9BiJ iaJ ms..m I O9p pm Dsmv6 PY Om 9w Yie10 No PlOspl 0aas OM 9Bvi91 NMA9wa I 9ev® Srin1 Pm Yn� 1 0401M 1.7001t Il%M 100d.O ISA% 677,514 ML,511 69;514 1 199,163 106,749 0988IS2 105,41 3 MD:M I.)s1,B% 1.)H,B95 096<Bl5 1235,074 33.1w J WDINI 3d0n 30)0% 100.000 MS,000 I.M.B% I1]9,895 1.091)69 J.191,05) IO;MO 0%2111 (1]],1%) 1 0201M 1?%%) 1.)Sa%1 1 0919951 117,135 5 BDIM 2,130", ;l%% IW.000 Ma000 1.)%,%) 1.3,503 J.091.9)a ).191,0] IdA79 09%101 (221.9f0) 6 01.01M 1,)13,%) I.H5.661 097712412 111191 1 0401M )OHMS )WW1 IQ000 NQOd UWA0J I11903 ],WI,Ji] 1 ],191,05) IdA% O.Bs6N3 (124011) 9 02dM 039,60) 1,11903 0916M 1143N 9 (WDIM ].lbl{ JJ%M 100.000 IIS,OOD 1„3)ZM 1,]31,W] J.ON.SW 3.191,033 IOSAN 0.B16353 (111.963 10 OMIIM 1.0);6% 1.9);6% 077A5) 111.%l 11 OWDIM ).LDN )S%IS 1000M 125.0OD I.Inm I1S1,691 J, s0'V,D) 1.191,05) Iat,Nd 0.IM31 (I13.913) 13 0201M 1,)25,086 1,)25,OB6 O)60323 MIMI IJ WOIM ).1Wt ).)9WS IQ.OQ 1Po,000 1.)13,W6 1.763.086 ).0➢0.1)2 1.197.0I 106,%1 0.113137 111 227 11 Wg14I)OG 1.J14))0 1.)14110 I 0.]3NJ1 MN.21) IS (DUVIOW 3.990% O9BWS IQOOD N0.000 IA14P0 U041J0 ),d)sN I J.IM,osl IOl.3U 0)01161 (114151) 16 01)0001 I,M11.616 1,301,616 I 0691091 IDl,df Is M14I/1011 LIMBO llllMl 1000% MOODI.MI1.616 1,)8).616 ;O)5.313 I ).19J,%l 101,(31 0.6]4I3 1I11. IB OL01/I% 391 2 1, ,id 1,297.764 I 0658916 I%,21721] 19 0! I.. M 4,2114"6 1%0% I, a0 1, 9,70, 5,5I11d 48I5,Po9 1 49033 10.65 ... (I24.933 ) 0 mItI0J 12 ],N I 06M19PZM 21 08,0I4( 139DK 1.390% IQ0 1,Po001) 1,107,096 I,601,3% 6,811192 4919.240 Id,14 0613,440 (MAN) 3 0201N 1.111.036 1,111,0% 0 L46.M 13 00014004 LNp{ LNO% 100.000 1,%, O 1 1,m 5,14 % 6.8I7,073 1 6,91,13 OdB mml ) 31 OL01/10M I.031. IAIW I 037110 17I.M 2 01,01AM005 If914 I.590B IQOW 1A0 I.M.1% SOKI 6814216 I 691 % IOS,N 03376I 159119 1 % M1AMOG min MIR I 0.51N13 97,637 2) OWI/1106 16800, 1.6301t 100.000 S.OM.000 , K , 414116 1 6y19.%0 10, % ... (N33) ) L O101R00) I720 M I 05191" 11,%S 3 %NIRO 1.7M al % IQ000 s.M % 12 4m,?" 6A31.1Po 1 695. d IW, W 0306913 ( 6N) MI Ol01/NOS A32I 6%)21 I 09% 9 51607 )I OB01/00B I.IM L % IQO% IIaWO 4311 7A31 1,1 {d2 1 1,335,100 IOU% 048))33 (1,,%) 32 OL01/'009 A Gsxm I 0471949 31,39 )) I LOWS 4.180% 1W0 115, % MAO 7AM 1,12;)11 I 1,535,200 I4916 ONWJI (;%)) N MM10 630%6 63atl6 1 0449916 50,M9 ]S Q AB%% L9%M 100000 IQW 6 11a911 1,131,711 I 1.533.100 103,428 0439016 13. 1 36 0201mil wjiol 607.1911 I 0.1190% 0 210 )] MIM1 b% 1)5.0 L9 LMJM IOOA00 00 ,t9B d) )1;B% 1.1A'1,)% I I,SiS,IW 10]Id. OA930 IB 11.3111 12 6N,1% 611.)96 o.N%51 19.193 W 0] I/10 ]9 011NI4013 1lNI% 4%OM iQ000 I20.OQ 611,1% 171,7% IA19,371 1,313.300 IWAi9 0.39%I1 (1,961) 10 0YOV1013 d1.519 611339 OJIOOW 11,211 11 63 3 MI C3 1J L94 A9%M IQW MO 61 O IPo, 1,sN I 1,13;W) 300 I,S73, IO11W 0.)9W71 (1,116) N WNIM/1011 6R06) 0..311851 N, W I1 L9IJ% IQO% 8.10. 0 4A63 9,7M063 91Po123 9,31a3W IdA 0%SWI I1.N0 1 . MMI 435 914 % 0.3%539 W."s 65 IMIS 49110% 1.9I06 IQ0 9,533.000 Os'm 8,9M636 9, Q231 9,511.100 IdF9 0)1618] 6.037 16 M1M16 211,1d 111,104 038033 13,516 O WNI/A16 4.9104 1..9M1% IOOA% t,%0,000 233.Id 9.I83.Id 9A06.3W 9,109,200 101.993 0 330070 IB,aW I SB.O]Q%O 15,011,29I 103,031,191 IW.01,291 I05.583.135 3,%1.]45 I,318.9111 . ..... J- A. 3 "0 WL 1 4 -TI X MERR)LLLWCHICO. OIW] P G l CawrySu1011m�'v MUu0e Cnmry lYJyoW A6wIURa6y. C%dd Wpw®Yflpgam l%69l,laeB Mlnaribvflvhm f]6.fI401DIMRmvIMgGti6ale NWhpyn CumIMUYn ]ehGuk I:CmMN6mm!We SOURCFSLIpFSW WNp3 RENNgNGCANpOAICdfOYM.VbN Y Ewmv: pe0m®110 6amlflm. Tg C rySIIYum U oFQu�Ca FUMeuxt fYJ10PY0 p I I16.f10.Op C%ap Nal0np ofm lswm.EeieC pn Remun)Id ltammu a o I a s)1)sssamCm NmEme arFtlmR.tim nmu.eRmtll a o I a R6uNIW11rvm9A®mllAmu! 0 s I e xarWue ReEVMri 6]9iMt RMrdIWI FNeyulAaamlAmul 0 s l o CA 0.N. fflNu01 RebaNlWl OermeFUW BJuae: 61)BJ)1 01 AIY,I71 CN Pre: )o]W]16 TW Eavm fS0�11 p I $M W.))1 --- TmIPU MIuml Rellvtld: f]16»,[N I 199]W�mv Flutl: t9.fl lb)] %TmurmN. a]vlOw I puceCrvlNRe6wtiiy C00.. 41AJ)I Re0uxy Facmr p{ult WlpPot p I I>J.I10.00) um.,a%Iwm snm o I [am Ce0 eF0umc lagaoo 0 1 Ippoo OepdorAavdlwa. 0 0I 0 Rplma Rome Oryup: 4W 01 AI�})1 4uvurePmum: )14 0I IIAll6 ._.......... FmN¢ 4 ml9 01 A)]J OAVMGEANALTEIE TdY Lb plWJll p I IC0.6pJ11 1�Wxwea. s]am% Twlarm,s.;�: lea>aa TW Reaml Vahv Saviy. f5]),6N Warne FW MjuWmY: 0 NtlTaYfluml VYue Srum'. f]JI6R PNANC)ROOATES — VV Sailp a%orRebvWdW Im16X M1N6 OI919] Pdavr6 OJ019J Fw Waa[ OS9191 F.[ter Sflg19l F.Refw blNuaet pp19] LY NWuhy OS9V16 FiN.WCOW OR0LA.R1pN A2iEyvThr Wev[ MNTue Wm[ ]]S9% 19RI Ruart Fw6 HO 09)J% W% 10WN�gdpa0 0uumv Puvw: O IA]s]113. AWy011E [ L [ [ [ [ fl [ t r [ [ [ l t l [ [ fl FffAPB.L LYNCB6 W. OS/0891 CaNy ,v D'eP v ,; C 3 S*5, Ni Imsllhapeml9'P9L9vmB 1cwJ.2019➢3 Pafin6vgCanifimrefPWeplim Bdeble2. 9a6vdi9fkh 9meim TUY pmW I 04Ya p 3.247M 9miY 9eW . TaW Dep 9m'm I Beq qw f)w.wa PV Als Ilse Ye Ns P-Wa ]rveu 0.h 9mo Im Amid I Shim Sn Seem zimw 1 CIMI:M 1250% I2NM I60000 45.00D ]RIN "303 767,I84 1 199,2W );0)9 00]IN )1.666 3 %KI191 I.N3,163 I,N),S6) 0961N4 N8.]l0 3 (SWIAS 23M{ 3.SOOl{ Itl1.000 315,000 I,N),16) I..,46) ;16;]35 ).19]A53 N.NB 09)]Hp (113.]99 4 ( AS I,N0,425 1.4NA25 09U))5 144,199 S w05 3,2w, 3,200% law MISAW 1,440425 I1M,425 3,I60AM 3.197A3 M.20) 0wW1 (108.416) 6 .!M 1,".,5 1,435."S 06612M 1a,995 l 060U96 xflMl ).S00% 1Ww Saw 1.41S. 4S 1.721.15 3.161.9% ),191.05) 35.163 OBIMSS (IW,676) 9 O2NIM 1,4MAM 1,4)0810 083NY I38.OM 9 QNIT SW016 SBWN IW.OW )gI,OpD IAMAM IIMAM] ),1611N 1.191,05] 35,)1) Ot03191 (M in) 10 om m 1.425.I10 IA25.IM 0.781879 I)5.N4 11 M:M 40MI6 4WS$ MOOW )1(S W 1.435.IW 1,])5,IM 3,169.N0 I ;W.053 M.7I3 0761"? (IN.107) 12 WN199 1.419A93 1.4148M I 01424W 13;M1 3 pN199 425M 4250% IWAW 325AW 1.41803 I.743A93 3,162.795 1 3.191,W3 34159 6721425 (105.162) N W014000 IAIIAM 1.411,9M I 0]049M 131,4W IS 4MOI420W 445 44M% lawMM 1.411AISS 1.731.916 3,10.W3 3.197,03 33.010 ON6M5 (1W,412) 16 m AlW1 I,b 421 1.4 421 0669342 IM.933 Il Q.OVN01 4.wSi 4.dw, IWOW MS,OW I,wA21 I159,421 3.I63.90 3,193A53 33.210 0022" OW.9W) IS m12W2 I.IK2M x3942% 1 0635552 IM,553 19 WNI/MM 415096 4.1NM IW.WO 4.03,000 ], S,56 5,491,2M 6A8],51) 1 6.=03 34.SW 0619M3 (I0IA76) m (X2w1f2W1 I.30.Wo I.M." 1 0034" 110,M1 21 WC)4W3 4.9M 4850% IWOW 4,M5w 1.2N,W0 S.M4W0 OJ113w 1 6,919$ M. ONW19 (86.311) M 0NI12W4 1.1"w 1.10.W9 1 0.57M04 91,951 M Mglc2m, 4.951M 435ft IW.WO 4.05AW 1,193,W9 SAftm 4885.118 1 4931,IM 35,N3 0.5M)5) (0j31) 24 W914W5 I.W)AM I,W3AM 1 0.54W11 14,SW 25 401Nlf2m, 5.OMP S.WfM IWWO 4.1M,W0 I.W3AM 5,M)AM 6,1131,615 1 4MIAM 34.W5 O.SMI66 (546(k) M a]PoI/2W6 SHAM 9646M 1 0.51&11 A" 27 WNI/10f6 SA 5.I50P IWAW 4,955AW wAM 5.919.6% 6,584.315 I 6,919.M 35,645 0.50)W2 (MASI) M 02.01I2007 W].w 937.4XRS 04W531 43.134 a Wg1AW] &2w, i.%q6 law s?I1pOp l3l.w (W;016 6A0.133 1 4941AIN N.869 0417149 (24.89]) M OLTI/AIW 701,436 M1.476 1 0.0570 M,M9 21 I410141118 5.254PM SSSOM ]am 9sm 701.46 194476 1.07,953 1 1,525 37.20 0.45311M (I0,9M) 32 W91/NW 09]45 699,245 1 0442255 211,019 33 (XLDI4W9 5.35 M 5.Mm )WWo Kw 09.Ms 1N.245 I,40.4W I 1.52 = 34110 0.4M941 (11.43) 34 OLAI401a 06AM 06AM 1 0410M 31,616 35 (NIMIM10 UMM SHOM M000 95AW 6M,8M 791AM 1.40.615 I 1.525.M )4525 0.4W1W 01,9&4) M Mimi 04M6 042% 1 0.2987M 21.235 37 01,401m,I SJSO% ll O 100900 law 6w,M6 1Km 1,40,M3 1 1.525, M6W 0.M8535 (12.315) M 03AI4012 01A21 01.01 1 03701 MA73 39 (1WIM13 fl b SAMM MYOW 105AW 01.621 l%A21 1.Y 243 1 1.52S41M M9M Ol68Wl (12.551) 40 a] IW3 08113 08113 1 0.3940 24526 41 QgV3013 dl 0 LVOM IW.WO 135'm 04113 M]AI3 1,49;M5 I 1,525,3W );3)5 0350297 (14,01) 42 ayOVID14 05,1M 05,1M 1 ONI30 M237 4) IwIM14 "all "WSS Saw 8.10A00 05.1M 11,190136 9.4]44]3 I 9.51011p 33.121 0.33MI3 (14.348) M W014015 40,929 aIAM 03241M 17.542 45 06M401S S1WM dllOM IWOM O. WAW 4am 9,WBM 9.471,855 1 9311.IW 33$45 031M22 (6,594) 0 MIM16 20,01 2W,433 1 O.W747 S. W 41 IwIM16 S.SMM `L3M% IMWO 8.9J11.000 2W,483 9,2M493 9.410.%5 1 9.5a" 31,235 O M38 2,94 1 M510.0W 49.232,01: 14)4,1Q01: 101.14xo1: 1 1W.515A36 e43A24 sn,m: a t ( l i e I [ e MERMLLLTMCNt CO. 0]9N)] GnGEI fmuy SUYYm Uehie4afQugeCmRy T�ehexul AL Refs. Cµml lmpormmJ w,&,, IDAOLS fl` B C/ l M I Flame F1AON,CN 199)ReOovN®Ceu6vnofPuvptin Coml MUW Lu tl BP OdW41:cmeomso.�mnlxe SOURCFseuFs oFFlOim RFFlmnwocwolMnrelNFOR]unoN Smm: Re0m0n0 kSmePz TdY cwlrcy stlman umm oraMa ca.Rr Pe.....—. •xn]RPFR n I 1HA»Aoo ommlmwa.aF�IF�lwun.s�c phvq®®/La+p t 0 0 o 111)S)),WJCnvOob MPumptin� .mue0lxee[ 0 RGm :" Wed MouOAmuY: 0 11 o o o Jmo1 xar4KR[MH U914% RWIPm�MRmmlNgYll 0 0 0 OYOm: aWwl RtleMIWl Resew FUMBWu-. MW71 01 41]FJ]I wPIce lolW TmlSavm SS;If,)]1 ]0I wlw?1 Ta Pu.]mw ReOvext wlN I IP)IPade b IMI %TdWme4 U.OIOK Ibu I I RmwCvnenbRWnnaa COM1: 41]4])I MefxiJny Fuoo MI.W. )o uT,OM,'M Nmenim%Faun IN= o I wsAPs l:aGarluwi¢: IWAT 0 0 0 0 IW.tl l]yonor.]mmn Wavt 6M SdmRmwRlom: 41RJ]I 0 41]BS]I WMoem Pmtlun My] 0 Xp)]l RvuWiq. IH 0 149 SnVM65 NMLT515 TMYUn ]6]IWjll f0 W.19B�1 Oseaw RuelYtl: 4F]Nll Tm Ooe Sm�V" A.Mb.%0 iW%em1 Vtla Sm®. slouN IlrMefmtl Mrymm[ 0 NaTaul flav0 VMusmp: FIS)19N FlNnNCMO Wm PV 9nvglr%eflsOUNMPv OW)0% Due MIMI omreen Osvw] Fvaaw. 009w) Fvu ReFeMeONmec .1`16 Ltl MCOmy: 0R9Y16 FIHANCQNMPoRWTION NtftIl v'. IU69% nBmThe Wud 19YM 1%]Revry sp Mn Utlewntlq 6pM 0 WMdellevi®: 0}TM .Mv{vlilc' 16.IH l t 1 1 1 1 l l t � ' t l t l Jw911a;1.VNtHaOD. wN9193 Camp 9meo 3Mrer.o3a�ep Crony Cybl lvpo�m P�gvo 19P)9{9vr 9 fJ4w4am I99J 9.mtlipG]dr.x9MgYim Se0e00sY 9<Bemf®Na59mes Tab6 OmWi i% 463691 SaW Seel T" DaM Sem I OM Um Dsmum PV 9m Vim Pim Fxpl 4amen Pb f W N 1 9nee inn► Fm Smrp I I =m 1.9N% I.BN% Imml IswO M.m Ns.JY! Ns.Sf! 1W.363 Io;NI 09tl1» M.1311 x OYOIM I.MI.OM I.MIA]6 O"m 3341M OLOIM ;OA% E.N6M ImQO J]S,91q I,]61,M 1,)MAM ),OT,w3 I 1.197.03 ImwO 0.9f211w (IM.»6) 1 wm% 1.156.79E IJSI,M 0.919)N x2;063 s mWm 3.]99% 3.)SBN ImM )90.0w I}5].b3 1,)$1.776 ),b1,195 3,197,w3 IO;9N Or"m I21&W 6 0]m% 1}SI,T6 IA31.)]6 I a8M33 3AMI mim )bB% J.Oi% Im.0.V ]940w 1,131,776 1.M .))6 ;w].55] 1 1,19],w) 101.5w 0.B361J) 12U.312 9 M)Im 1,»;As I,AS,)]5 1 OQ591] xll}Iz 9 mglm 1]99% ]YA% ImQO NS.Ow I.3mAm ;)34]]5 ).tlM.9]O I ],19),Os) IOasR 0916119 (I N,z10) 10 0].OI% 1.J]98H 1}WH 0.]96905 (IMAM II =41% )6N% ]6N% 1mOw 915,m0 I,J»,9 S 1.m.us ).w].]N 1,19],wJ IOI.NI aallimmill,7MI4 (I M.W IS mqm 1.»I.MS 1})1,3fs I a)59)19 M.'" 1) Nql% ].BY% ].BY% ImOw 04000 I}JI.MS 1,761,b5 J.09L»9 1 J.191ASJ IW.43 07UM (IM.I]w Is wAH4100 1}D.011 1.J».011 I Omlm 123.3 I] mNAICW lbM l0N% Im.wO 950,Ow 1}2;011 I.11;011 J.w6.0Y1 ;191.w2 IOI,wO 8~1 ll»,M9) 16 0].NI/lml 1}115OJ 1.3».9w 063b51 IAS,SM 1) mNlgml 1198% 119M Im00D �6f,N0 I.M.1m 1.:Iw.m) 109L9w 1 J.19),w) IW,3M m6mm (Ix1,N3) I9 0A1/Sw I,Mm,N3 5.514.NI I 0.6593H 193.IA 19 =141pw Uq% tJYN ImMO 0314mO ;Mm,193 S.s1a193 6A11,ffi I 493;w) Iw.]N 0.61M91 (10111B) m OO.DIROw Ululs 162AIf 0617 IN.11l EI NNIItmf a9Nlf] 9.ap% Im00D a]N,000 I.z1;6N ljl 6 4013.3)5 6,919}N Ib,wS 06126W (143,919 R 02N1/MW 1.119JH SONA)9 I 0599Y19 193,9111 U IXWI f l54% aSYM ImOw <.sTO.00D I,IIa9N 1.01 N 4819,%9 I 4931.IM 101.133 OXNw 119,%) N 4XMI4t 03 1.0146w SAID. ) as]w10 119j99 » mp%N a6Yn l6N% ImOw y9mOw IAI46w Smm, 69EI.EIS 1 4921.6p ImMs a556&) (61.123) 36 wA1Rw6 mm"sms 999A55 a5mss 40% 21 MIAIN6 liY% alY% Im00D sA]4090 99➢A55 5.919A55 4919,111 4919.%1 IOIAN 0.513W (54650) M 00m2N1 MA I mml 0.sI93M );x19 M OaNlI2m) a]SN% a19BM ImtlA S.M1m0 )MAGI 40HABl 4BE4.761 1 4933,OOp Iw}l9 050NN (2;)131 )I M14K)0B aBY1S 191M ImNO IIS.Om N1»l 75�573mm 1,6Y;191 I 1}»,3m 10.03 Ob2962 Imp ]] w.Nl/!m➢ MIN 654)96 0, 199 5 53.76E » MNIMIO l94% a9Nk Imo» IM,wO Wall ]N5)B6 I.RI}ll I,s;s,MO Iw,6M 01»NS (3,)65) M OLDIg010 6NA» 7W17 I 0559NS 51,557 )5 mNdmil 1919N {Mpl Im9m 135,000 61;913 Mk?24 1,<M,6N I 1,525,]OD Ib.SN 0<)9N0 (9M0) 56 IOWIMIl 6N,1N N4)N asvl)6 soim » MIM12 aHB% aNB% 1m0o0 us,No 6µ3N ]»,)xi I,4x119 I}ss,MO Im,)» a"10 O.IX) M w.N1=2 611.J95 m.us 0.NBIM 59,375 N mNl/301E l9NN lMM9 Im9m IW,mO N;»5 637MI 1,Q;70 1 I.s»]m IwA31 0.)ASOB (7,I96) W mNl%» w],9x1 N],RI 1 0399N0 14512 N a MIM14 MB% aTN% 100990 IaaN N1931 6U�wlM,334 LQO,BIz Lsss.mo 1b}10 OlIM1 2)MI 47.579 93 NNI%19 a5V41,15 aNf11 ImNO 41JO.ON 04}N 4669}34 9.N4N1 1 9.514200 101,533 035W7 (9A21 N CoXIM35 - 9];9s0 <3;950 0MM3l 11A62 95 NN mI6 l9NN l9Y% ImOm 9,SIQON m.00 &96;9M 9,N5,9m 9}I1,lw Iw.11m O.NSrI 5.219 96 OLNIM16 M.670 331,6M 0.3MO 15,9M 97 O6NI/]016 aW% a9Y% ImNO 9AN.Om 3x1,610 91I81.6M 9.N>.15I 9,MNAllO IbAN O)MIN IB,9b I __N�mO 4s.0A,0i6 Iw.119a96 Iw}IMW I I0.se5.63l ;L66.sN Itsl.9sx 1 1 1 1 i i, � � � t t t 1 1 1 1 [ L [ [ [ [ t [ [ [ [ e [ [ [ [ l e e 0 _.NCNLN OlAW J PACE CIPWI iYbnG pw I.eG RmOatS Wb 4yl�o/®IFIm®IWOFaa®e ne..�wwa S. s%L»am IW)RtlOWgCetltvlearleOgYW ce,wrneu IItlleOUe l:C®Immteemsta slRmGuatmxorwxGs � onulpxocwwluTE wroRwJnox sous: Rdmdry bWIt I1F0 AH ul.roauEm%I wwi%era.rW� Re Miwu'. U6&ss.Ptl p I t10.Rn,Ptl C%btllApavoml RvpmIWYRA 3a1nC MU mv�uuo/Ia Wav6 0 • I 0 Uny33JNCeYOwn ofPaury�b� Rm Nmue 0 01 0 RtladlWl Nlam ArmNAmW 0 01 0 %ur]we0.de@S MIMI PdaellWl PvagJAmml Aavul 0 01 0 fiY We 10.01A1 OWeeW IWl0.vaw Fud BYvm: IIflJ)1 01 ll'It.111 fiONs: IVI.O'ON TWISwme UI,011j]I W I t6WU.331 TOW YUNnomY Reflvv4d f1I.6M.fW I HMR—F : W,31J2n %Tuulmtl: U910% M1e: RmwCOnaIm WOVMvy COR 41TLln ReMN,q Frew IXpae. U5�59A W USA39A Utlawumy9pu0 fHy3 0 sWb Cmn M4vuim. IWAW O I IO1.OM ENp�]orA�.e morel: a R I o trLl Ser¢Rne�e pym'1', 41n)n 01 un.3n wJ.uo o I v;uo -- Rwitl'mg JJ]s o I JSn MvwatANALYW3 Ta . WI,011))I b MI,OU�1 ObWun P%OlOOI s.IJ1M TgyplygWvp; fl)II.M TMtl1M VO0m Yr6g: tfb%s IW W Futl AEjemimt' 0 NOTgtl Ilmtl VAn&my'. f)3F,06J iwANCMGMTFS _ ws%merxxR.e.wWRe Ems% OtlaQ ONllfl] F. OY➢IAJ F INeef OWIAJ FW Pw. og,o m f0u Re0etlN mmu[ OH01AJ W NWOCy 0001116 F CWGMFbRAUT AOibyeTV Nmat JIAM AWnTn . LtlmOOF I M73 OYI Rane FlOLL t4o"m I]We^mV 3Pm 0W3% Noevmflmotm: 0]IF% [ L I I 1 l l l t I I I 1 [ l l l 1 1.®lual.crllcxa onn% ��]6Nuem osuiro arw.T��Kl QR6911mpwems6 9q®1990.9}.8�e 9 sWAu.66o 19919KmA�yCgifiYnae�l:y.m� 31e.66.z S6m6%im5mm TaW6 I O�OON6u6 S.Isxm 9ssl 9msl TOW IMh Sim Oh aA� 0.ran ry OY Ib YW6 I,u F.Wd smw Pm Snip I 1 WNI% S.IOp{ 5.100% IOOLW xS,OW 121501 )K,901 lN,S01 )99.261 N.)62 O.9S 6! N,IN 3 %AI% I.M,165 I,K9,165 0%x563 IN,)M I OS01% $.1(0X 5.10p% IWWO x100W L. 794) 1. 9790 ),IN.)% I ).19).W) K.]E 011418 19t1%) l Wilms I.M,190 1.12190 0.91N11 1 7 5 OW193 s.IWIY SIWM IOJ 000 MQ000 I.K;)90 I.]O;ISO ;115.180 1.19].OSI Sl,l]l 0191611 (9x,95)) 6 W.OI% I,QQIW 1.616.IW I 0K9111 141.1611 ) OIg1% S.IWF S.IOOK 100.0W ES.WO I.AIb.IW IAILIW ),10,)x0 1 ;197.OSJ 19.733 OM315 (9409KM) 9 0301M 1.620,I0 1,QD.IN1 ommi 1%.9W 9 OLD19) 5.1001t S.IW% 100.00D xS000D I,49.IN 1.Q1.753 I,IN,x95 I I.19),M) N,)51 01053N 1MAB to oY(N% I.QI li) I.M.)5) 1 0185)M I%Ax5 11 (M()Im S.IWIS 5.100% IOp.000 ]Ipp)p I.QI.)% 1.]xl,l% ;IQ.%K 1 S19).0% %,SN O165W1 131N Ix ON)199 1Aµ1W 1AµIW 0727M m 13 Otgl% 5.1614 SIOp% IW WO )xg0]D I,Nt101 1.]N,10) ),IN,WS I 3,197,03 N.BK 07M53 (99,639) 19 0]AIQOIp I.N5911 111 , 3 0.]091W U4610 IS ()VI)1 ]IN S.IOOK S.IWY 1000p0 %S,NO I.NS.W) I.M.W I,IK,f85 1.19].OS) 301N 0.6915% (34N6) 16 WAI/Agl I.M.KO 1.%1.ND 1 0.6)916] 1)5391 Il MNIM01 S.IWiI S.IW1l 100.000 )SOAW I.M.NO 1.l475 I.INAW I 1.197,W3 32231 o.W]1W (0A13) 11 Ox.01lNM I.M.47S 1.%d91s 0.6N1E IN.916 19 OV()1=1 S.IWM S.IW% Im WD tWS,OW 1.1NA)S S,I 03 4611.9f0 49C403I 50.101 O'6 (91A10) x0 W.OIMM I.M.W3 5. 031 0601916 I20A13 xl OONIMW S.IWif 5.10DK IW.OW t%OWO I,IM,M3 S.SBa,051 6A60.I0 019AK 31.113 0.S9%32 MA31EE MWMOOxLAANAO)IIIIIMMgMMOWWMMW SA004 iA0p6 KD.000 6AIf,,0o1 . I 1,17t101 1,17MW 0 SM741 WM3 5.10 % S.IOp IW0 6 % W 03 4eKW I Q,1M 5315 0. 6% 11M WIM I.M,1Q IM,143 05 11.939 0g1W S.I(m Slop 100 A,lSW 5 .4 ]% =m) (58.074) w lT mols moil o3mm MM x) MN sAp la . a I 3M 6I.05 1 419.9 49 0W (14N ) S1A"s Slow 1 0. W A11 Qw,"S gW 6Wf, D AM% p )9}67cw 6)QM I 01 19 NA%] 31 Oe91/NO) S.IOJ% S.IN% IWOCO I10,T0 6146Q W% IAl),yi 1 1333.Np 51915 0K1751 (15A]o) 32 WAIMM 6]SSW WQSW I OMl% 15.911 % fl amlo SAWw sAaOM IMpJO IssaW 6l).SU W 38) 1.01;16s I 1Ax5.xW s)Als OMM O5.]Q) 3e WAIM10 6)0195 W50. 9s % 4OIM10 0.100% EIOp{ IW.0o0 I140W 6]0)93 WSSW 1.115.H0 I,s3f1W 69,610 0 S�M3 (x7v % WpllNll 66053 M95J OM163 17»0 I) MNIMII 0.100% SIW% 100.000 IK,000 W.M3 W495J I.Q)A05 1 ISri xOO SI,US O)95161 (1)M % WRIMIx 6W.M 6W311 O3WEl %.Ex % MIM1] SI00% 6.IW% IOOpoO I15,000 6WAS nkmMANS 1,()I,IW I 13x5,IDo Sl.N3 OS]SSW (11,191) 10 W.OIM1] 639.615 SKM I 03WI3 M Q MIMI) 0.1W% 0.100% IW.00D 155,000 05.6W WS.6W IA)4l% 1 ISx5,31p 30A10 O%69% (la%11 Q OSOIMI6 W5.]13 WQ)3] 1 OJI79W ll,l% O 01611M11 0.100% AIOp1 IoO.OW a150000 WQ])) IAOQE) 9.KLK5 9.SIQEO N,ll3 Q3 m 120%1 K WNIMIS M.M 01 R I O))WM xM% N pii1m, a100N SIOON IW.OW 8,563,000 M. 9,W.Sw 9,K0,115 1 9,SII,IW 50.]Bf 0.)EM (eAl1) K WA)IM16 Y193f0 E9300 1 0.3I001 I;KS Q MOIM16 5.100% 0.100% IOOAW 9,OW.OW E9,3p0 9,xA,500 9A%,OW I 9308,311D NAW 0)06110 ;9Q I 56ASSOW 47SIt831 IM,>MA51 101.)WA51 105385,Q6 1]13y31 t59%5 ION, l [{fl [ 1 fl [ l t [ l l l l l fl fl (\I [ l meanll.L�... _xnm. o)mx) �� vocal Camp SUWaOa�CbOW afQup C�vW Synllwne FwJY u Atlniuv Per$.%ueeue GpW Inymavil Pryun 19p%,BmbB Crmml MaFee be li BF [iP,ObAb 199)Peflmtilf C W ISJu NPM2PIOr1 SluNk 1:Cunldvd$gpapnVW BgIMBOnwq OPF)IxW POFlPlCMOCMrgMIHMfgWqqx BwM: PnOmtiy Bewv Ma. Ta cawr favuxm dmm of aM J�aPY MAmwi¢ f14M0.M0 b I f]AobAw Gp0)Ilmpwemml P.gwI0t0A),OatlrC b%aMw/WOIIOaF[ 0 0 I o f]]t,JJJ.W]c wfLNtlpnbl AmuM0var0 0 a I o RJ%W IMIfYSVAmmJAmin 0 0 o %orlum ReMWM: mml PYr1e01wlPoWptl Amity 0 0 1 B GBOMe: Owwl PYIe11Ml RrawfW Be4—noe: 41u,071 a I 41tU71 GOfOw ]0000N TpJSaem k;ttl,]tl b b; 71 -- Taw Puxmml wnm0el ulA4wo J9il Pewee PmM1 pJIM xTm.rm.n w.sbx uw: I Nem'e OlnN bpeOotlmgC00.: 41'ly71 0.e0uiEinp E'nw[Iey m: yl,OlO,)la b I UI,OMjN 1..rjag SpM JOJ,y® o I IM.M cm an.m�am ]agaao 0 ]w,aM IaYwil orAmueamlcer. 0 0 B oasm�m Pawe nvam 4]tU71 a 4ma. Lumna Fmrvm: ]oc?aB o Joc,]sP — 0.om�iP: VSI 0 USI SAVMOf A%ALY91S TWlllra J6i,]]P]]1 W H),]]Pjtl pmvOpyalyy; 1 1% TaMdm BMnV: f4el]q TdYflamJ Vtlm LtLp: fl.%1.1W PmmeFutlMfmNwc 0 _—___ Na TaW AaW VeNl OMO'V' fl.%J.%0 FlHAHCMO UATIB 34)3)% Bne6 0Y919) Ckliene6' 01919] F Nlwl (bU19) Fw Oar. wg191 %w NPMeONNr[ UM M Ir MW10- OB9Ina EM.WCMa MFOPMA m AN'AO lnuvt gS]01%ffi . av)tB]e Nemml Fwm e S 19al RmwFrmG H,IRlj IGtlewnmi83pv1 097 t NL Luwerca PmNum OM Arngelile: 1173, t I t t t t 1 t t f 6 I t t t t 1 1 l E 1 60]tRRL LTIICHA W. O3 m cur sawam 13�or0�.�ma4r Cry8411v0nor®me nos.a 199J92 sam a sse,osoaW 199l Ra6Mig(:nffie4u orP.ni�.l� SOFeAAe2: Refim1vg D4M Swim i9W ae�m1 0�6.�m6=¢ aWol% Bmvl Bail imY Mtl 9w'ra Ddl 0m� OiI 5Pv du RW YvM 94re P4914T1 West RMSwim Na Reela6 Servsa Ssrmp I. rv0w I -- 1 """M43W% 4.1m IMM0 wim 693.698 693.6W 1 199m 105.566 0.W81" 101,314 2 029194 1.M.3W 1.3 .WS 0954W M.M 3 089194 4.7W% 4,IM 100000 3XM 1.M.395 I,IOI,M 3,094.7%0 3,IW.053 Imm 0.942086 om!I4) 4 02N195 1.179.747 1A79.M 0.91W31 WI)49 5 N't)IM 4580K 4180% 100000 335.= 1,379.747 1.714.147 X0 M I %193.W3 102359 OW8180 (ICKM3) 6 mim 1.371141 1.371.741 1 0.871000 in"] 1 MIMS 4.180% 4, 0 Imm 350000 1.371.741 1,E1,741 3093.481 1 3IW.053 103.572 0.8563w (105,SIq 8 %9191 1,36I,T6 1,363,316 1 0 BM127 IX616 9 08/019/ 438M 4 m IM" M5,000 I.M3.316 1,12$336 3,091,151 3.IW.053 IOS.M2 0816410 (IM010) 10 02N1m 1,354,652 1.354.653 0.797159 IW,4M 11 =m 4180% 4.180% IO3.. 385.OW 1.354.W2 1,139,632 3.094.%4 1 3.M.053 10;149 0.))8M1 (10..847) 12 py0199 I,M5,451 1,343,451 1 0760006 IW.339 13 QNIr91 4.380% 43M IW.M 405.= I.M5.451 1.15O451 3.W5XI 1 3.10,053 101,152 0.14M5 (113,141) H 02AV20W 1.333,D1 035.111 1 0]245W IM399 15 0 42p80 4.7M 4.7M IW.WB 4A.OW 1,335,111 1,755,771 3,W1.M2 1 3.1r.053 1WA11 0105W (11).Zl) 16 O2Po113001 1.325.133 0 733 OW(MI16 IW,4W 11 Mffln(01 4180% 4Im Iwm MO,OW I.M.733 1.765.733 3.01.466 3,1W.053 IOS.A3 0.6145M (11;185) IB mv)l 2 1,315.217 1.315.217 1 0.65WA IM.593 19 NOI)I 2 4180% 4.180% IWOW 4.190.W0 1,315,217 5,505.211 6,8A,4M 1 6,922W3 101.619 064M89 (116.943) A ON012W3 1,215.016 1.215,06 1 0.621925 161,W4 21 W I1 4.7m 4.1110K IW.WO 4385,W2 1.215.016 5.60O06 6A15.152 1 6A19,240 1010W 0.613119 (99911) R 0bM4m)N 1.11%235 1.110.275 1 0398660 146,84) 23 OW1QW0 4.7M 4.7m IWOW 4,M." 1.11%215 3jW.215 6A15,549 6.921.IA 103.511 O.M4543 (slf M ON119W5 I,WO4M I.M4M 0.57mm M.181 25 WNI/ 4.18014 4.18(K IMM) 4.BA.OW I.W0.454 5.m4M "Mm I 6.921,W0 IWi32 O551HA (W.W1) 26 (MM&M)16 W5,256 W5.256 1 OM4159 104.600 n f46012006 4.180% 4, W IWOW 5,045,OW W5,256 5,93O2M 015.512 1 &919.960 IO4.M 0.5313T (46b341) 28 (Xwl OD) 164A81 164.681 1 U181W B3,113 29 =1R0p1 4 M 4.7m IW.WO 5.290.W0 164681 61 M01 &919.M1 1 CIM.000 1W,639 0.SW564 (21,699) 30 OL01/3038 638,250 63&250 1 0.491619 613 31 (Y01/30W 41W% 4.180% Iwm 145.M 6M$ 7mm 1,421,4W I 1.525X9 IW.101 0®M55 (9.933) 32 0Y0112009 6M.184 6M.M I 0.411M1 W,214 33 W411/'OO9 4.7m 4180% IMM ISOOW 6M,184 1M.M IA19.568 I 1.30; 10.632 0.N0441 OVI5) M (MI]I 010 631.199 631.193 0449589 5..016 35 =IMIO 4980% 15B0% IW.WO 1Wm 631.193 791.1% 1.422398 I,MS,2W 10 0.438W1 (12555) M ()M)IM11 621,315 M.315 0.428636 51,962 31 MI)I 011 1180% 15W16 IWWO 16&OW 623,315 192.315 1A19.750 1,525.A0 IW,450 0418528 Oz; ) M MIMI2 M.432 623.432 0.4g659 56,812 39 WNIM32 Ims 11W6 IWOW 115,OW 623.432 1W,432 1.421.863 1525,2W 10,337 0.399022 (14 1) 40 0VW)IMI3 619,M9 619.2" 0389513 55ASI M (OX)IM13 11W% 1RJ% IWWO ISS.W 619.249 IIN.249 I423,498 Ij25.=) I0I,7M 0.380425 (15A44) 42 MIM14 614.BW 614.828 M371455 54,01 43 (XPMM14 15&1% 11W% In= II.Mm 614,1118 8,1948M 9,4W,655 9,51%M 1W545 0.362696 (11,129) M MIM15 419.3W 419,3M 0.3M143 36,733 45 (4A)IMIS 19,10, 1980% 10OW0 &MM 419J &989Am 9'4 651 1 9.511.IW Im; OM5192 (441) M 0291MI6 214503 214.5W 1 0337M 19.434 41 (0NIM16 19W% 1MOK Imm 8,913AW 2145W 9,IN,SOI 9.404.W5 9.N8.3W 1041% 03TM16 16351 I 5&OSO,CW 45,W9,330 103,OA,210 I01,099,310 10.585.436 2.tl6,A15 1.565,560 3/17/93 a COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JOB NO. P2-42-2 SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT 2 SUMMARY OF CONTRACTORS' INSURANCE BIDS AND DISTRICTS' COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION(COCI PROGRAM SAVINGS CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR TOTAL INSURANCE DISTRICTS' CDC PROGRAM BID BID CDC PREMIUM SAVINGS MARGATE CONSTRUCTION 14,496,000 54,000 36,240 17,760 ZIEBARTH & ALPER (JV) 14,990,000 55,000 37,475 17,525 HUNTER CORPORATION 15,004,781 82,781 37,512 45,269 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS 15,296,800 53,000 38,242 14,758 STEVE P. RADOS, INC. 16,187,000 30,000 40,468 (10,468) KIEWIT PACIFIC COMPANY 16,517,131 60,000 41,293 18,707 CDC_BIDI.XLS 3:41 PM COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION MASTER PROGRAM PROPOSAL FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY March 17, 1993 Presented by: Ted E. Davidson Senior Vice President Diana J. Sutton Account Executive , J COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION MASTER PROGRAM PROPOSAL TABLE OF CONTENTS r Pie Numbers r I. Introduction 1 II. Schedule of Projects 2 r ' III. Marketing Results 5 IV. Our Recommendation 9 V. Appendix • Specimen Policy Form r • Bid Specification Wording • Sample Certificate of Insurance r r r J J D=ODUCI'ION J J J J J J I� r j INTRODUCTION r We have prepared the following Course of Construction Program Proposal for your review. As discussed in our previous report "Course of Construction Master Program", the advantages of implementing an owner controlled Master Program lower insurance costs, administration control and coverage consistencies. r This proposal is based on the Schedule of Projects provided by County Sanitation Districts of Orange County under Section II of this proposal. Our marketing results including coverage, d+ terms and premium comparisons for all proposals. Our recommended program is Proposal I, the Zurich Insurance Company. A specimen policy form is included for your review. We appreciate this opportunity to provide you with a program designed to be the most comprehensive coverage, and low cost program to meet the Districts' Course of Construction insurance needs. r r r r r r r r I u -2 J �.{ SCHEDULE OF PROJECTS J J J J J '%jol i �w W SCHEDULE OF PROJECTS r The following Schedule of Projects was developed with the assistance of the District's Staff. We submitted this schedule to provide underwriters with a typical District construction year so s, that this proposal could be developed. This program is designed to address any and all construction projects undertaken by the Districts. r r r r r r r 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SCHEDULE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PIKIECT ID START DATE )ONION VALUE • PROJECT DESCRIPTION P1-36 August 1993 2 years $35,000,000 The secondary treatment expansion at Plant No. 6 menthe 1. This project expands our existing secondary treatment capacity from 66 Md to 80 Md. The work includes the addition of large elactrlc motors and blawers, refurbishing of the existing reactor Death including news piping and an air diffusion system, the construction of tan new secaWry, clarifiers, three nw dissolved air flotation units, a secondary water pop plant Cfor the Orange Canty Water District), and related facilities. The work Is largely structural concrete, most below grand. However, It does Include substantial mechanical and electrical work. P2-35-2 S June 1993 1 year $7,000,000 Warehouse and Maintenance Buildings at Plant P2-35-3 3 months No. 2. This project is the construction of approximately 60,000 square fast of buildings and warehouse facilities, all with tilt-up construction. P1-37 December 1993 2 years $32,000,000 Primary treatment facilities. This project is 8 months the construction of up to 72 Md of primary treated basins. This work is the building of reinforced co erote tanks, Including covers similar to buildings. P2-42-2 June 1993 2 years $25,000,000 Secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 2. 1 month This project Is modification to existing secondary facilities end Includes the lengthening of twelve secondary clarifiers. The lengthening is 50 fast long and will require dwetering for this below grade construction. The work is largely reinforced concrete construction with mechanical additions. At" included is the construction of an above ground dissolved air flotation tank. ` Subject to change after receipt of bids. 3 County sanitation Districts of orange Canty Construction Project Schehlle Page 2 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT PROJECT ID START DATE PERIOD VALUE a PROJECT DESCRIPTION J-26 November IW3 ➢ months $1,500,000 Personnel Building at Plant No. 1. This is the construction of an approximately 5,000 square foot building using framed, above grade construction. TOTAL: $100,500,000 Subject to change after receipt of bids. DATE: December 31, 1W2 PANELA\WP\CSDOC\CST-PRJ.SCN 4 J J J NARUE.TING RESULTS J J J J J J �1 J J COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION MASTER PROGRAM PROPOSAL COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY MARCH 1, 1993 PROPOSALI PROPOSALII PROPOSAL HI INSURANCE COMPANIES: Zurich Insurance Company Insurance Company of North Albert Insurance Carpany America BEST'S 0110E RATING: A, Excellent; Class xV, A. Excellent; Class xIV, A, Excellent; Class V111, Policyholders' Surplus of Policyholders' Surplus of Policyholders' Surplus of 52,000,000,000 or more $1,500,000,000 to $100,000,000 to $250,000,000 $2,000,000,000 CALIFORNIA STAWS: Admitted Admitted Admitted POLICY YEAR: Three Years Optional Extensions One Year TMo Years available after three years. EFFECTIVE DATE: To be determined Same as Proposal 1 Same as Proposal 1 COVERAGE: "All Risk" Builders' Risk Same as Proposal 1 "All Risk" Builders' Risk including Earthquake and Flood. including Flood and excluding Earthquake. LIMITS: $45,000,000 Per Occurrence $50,000,000 Per Occurrence 550,000,000 Per Occurrence Slblimita: Earthquake: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence and $5,000,000 Per occurrence, 25% of Estimated contract value Annual Aggregate Annual Aggregate subject to for land Movement, per maximun of $10.000,000 Annual occurrence and annual aggregate Aggregate for all contractors If sad; 510,000,000 Per Occurrence and $10,000,000 Per Occurrence, 550,000,000 Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate Annual Aggregate subject to Amaral Aggregate maximum $25,000,000 Annual Aggregate for all contracts Transit: $500,000 $250,000 Per Contract (Options 25% of Contract Value up to $1,000,000 available) Offsite Storage; $500,OOD $250,OOD Per Contract (Options 25% of Contract Value up to $1,000,000 available) 5 PROPOSAL I PROPOSAL n PROPOSAL III s blimits: (continued) Debris R.val: $5,000,000 $50,000,000 25% of contract Value Expe,dit in, Expense: $250,000 $250,000 coverage available at additional premftm Extra E.pn , $1,000,000 Nan. coverage available at additional premium. More inforestion fa needed. DEDUCTIBLES: All other Perils: $10,000 510,000 $5,000 for projects tp to $10,000,000 contract Value $10,000 for projects up to 350,OOO,ODD Contract Value flood: $50,000 $250,000 5100,000 Earthquake: 5% of values at risk at time of 5% of values at risk time of 5% of values at risk time of lass subject to $100.000 loss subject to 5250,000 loss subject to 5250,000 minimum. minimm. mini mum. TOTAL INSURABLE VALUES: $100,500,000 $100,500,000 a100,50D,000 ANNUAL RATE: 5.125 5.245 $.1825 ANNUAL PREMIUM: $125,625 • $246,225 • $183,413 ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS: Deposit prmmiva of 525,000 Rates proposed are a Mini mum premi us per project required. cmposite including is SSCD. Earthquake and flood. Projects declared under Return proof ua available if policy covered to Deposit Premi Ora of S250 total final contract value completion. required. is less than estimated value. • Projects other than wastewater treatment to be admitted and written at rate to be agreed. • Does not represent actual premium due to different project terms. Premiums are provided for comparison only. 6 PROPOSAL I PROPOSAL II PROPOSAL III agmt)tauL CONDITIONS: After addition of project (Conti mass) to this policy there will be no cancellation of the project. Rates for full land movement coverage to be verified upon binding. • Rates subject to increase for renovation. • Projects other than wastewater treatment to be submitted and written at rate to be agreed. 2/22/93-CZOCNCM-PROP.93 7 r ADDITIONAL MARKETING RESULTS r We also approached National Union (AIG), Home Insurance Company and Reliance National. Declinations were received from these insurance companies due to limited reinsurers that provide reinsurance for the limits specified in this proposal. Rates were expected to match those in our comparison. Reliance National could not provide earthquake capacity. If additional Earthquake coverage is desired on individual projects, excess coverage is available at competitive rates. Excess All Risk limits are available for projects larger than $45,000,000. Any excess coverage desired would be provided by other insurance companies. r r r `� 8 1 u 1 -J J OUR RECCbR ENDATION 1 r 1 J J J J J J J .I i OUR RECOMMENDATION We recommend the following action: 1. Selection of Proposal I, Zurich Insurance Company for a three year policy tern. The Zurich proposal has the following advantages: • Three year term with guaranteed rate including Farhquake and Flood. An extension is available at the end of three years. . The policy rate will be reevaluted at this time and is subject to change due to market conditions. • High sublimity for Transit, Offsite Storage and Debris Removal. • Extra Expense offered at no additional premium. • Lowest annual rate offered. We have reviewed the Zurich policy form included in this proposal and find it to be acceptable. 2. All future construction projects requiring Course of Construction insurance will be provided coverage under the Master Program. 9 ;J J J ASIX J u U J J J J J uapdR "zb s�'i�-41 MTS DHS.SERVICE Bae 772 E7% P.E.zz9002i022 COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION INSURANCE POLICY POLICY NO. THE INSURANCE COMPANIES SUBSCRIBING HERETO (HEREINAFTER CALLED THE INSURERS) EACH ONLY FOR ITSELF AND NOT ONE FOR ANOTHER BY THIS JOINT POLICY OF INSURANCE DO INSURE r AND THEIR WHOLLY OWNED OR MAJ9 CONTROLLED SUBSIDIARIES. !�'' r 1 In Witness Whereof the Insurers, through ENCON Underwriting Agency, Inc. duly authorized by them for this purpose, have executed and signed this policy. PER: PER.• DATED: DATED: THIS POLICY CONTAINS CERTAIN CONDITIONS WHICH MAY LIMIT THE AMOUNT PAYABLE. ENDORSMIENTS ATTACHFD: ENDORSEMENT No. 1 - "' ENDORSEMINT NO. 2 - ENDORSEMERT NO. 7 - ENDORSEMENT NO. a - ,� ENDORSEMENT NO. S - ENDORSBf(8NT NO. 6 - ENDOR8931ENT NO. 7 ENDORSEMENT NO. 8 - eC/e7 �`YFlN 20 '93*'I5 4e MTS INS.SER/ICE 818 772 2798 P.3,22 Builders Risk Policy Page 1 BUILDERS RISK POLICY DECLARATIONS 1. a) NAMED INSUREDS .r b) ADDITIONAL INSURED: All hereinafter " ferred to as the INSURED. I 2. LOSS PAYABLE: 3 . TERM OF INSURANCE: Both 12:01 A.N. Standard Time at Project Site. Effective Data: Expiration Dates 4 . LIMITS AND DEDUCTIBLES: ITEM LIMIT Policy limit for any cne $ lose or occurrence SUBLIMITS DEDUCTIBLES Project Site - Physical Damage $ $ Except Earthquake - Annual aggregate $ S Flood - Annual Aggregate $ $ r, Transit S S Off Site S $ Delay in Completion Coverage $ Day waitinc Period Dabrie Removal $ S 06/92 ua}�N �d '93 1t�42 MTS INS.SERVICE 618 7-2 2796 - P.4%2Z0004/022 w I Builders Risk Policy Page 2 a S. DESCRIPTION 0? PROJECT: m 6. IACATION OF PROJECT: ' 7 . ESMI FATED TOT T: \� S. PREHIM( AND ADJUSTMENT: a) Adjustment Rate (par Annum) $ per $100 of total project cost b) Annual Premium (Provisional) $ c) Term Premium (Provisional) $ d) Minimum Earned Premium $ a) Installment $ Due f) Installment $ Due q) Installment $ Due 06/92 uif�ifJ cO '93 'ig%2 MTS IMS.SERVICE 018 772 2796 R.522fl 005/022 ti Builders Risk Policy page 3 SUBSCRIBING INSURERS AND PERCENT SUBSCRIBED PSimary Insurars �reent Subscribed First $ any one occurrence but in the aggregate per annum for each of the perils of Flood and Earthquake excess of any deductibles. � 4 * 9 IDSVIM r S any ccurrence but in the aggregate per antrum for each of the p a or Flood and Earthquake excess of the �.../ Primary $ any one occurrence but in the aggregate per annum for each of the perils of Flood and Earthquake which in turn excess of the deductibles. + Second Excess Inge 5 any one occurrence but in the aggregate per antrum for each of the perils of Flood and Earthquake excess of $ any one occurrence but in the aggregate per annum for each of the perils of Flood and Earthquake which in turn excess of the deductibles. ea/92 ��.J *.'0 '9S`1T:43 MTS INS.SERVICE SIB 77Z 2796 p,6/ZTUUtl/U2L Builders Risk Policy Page a + Third Excess Insurers percent eubscribed 9 any one occurrence but in the aggregate per annum for each of the perils of Flood and Earthquake excess of $ . any one occurrence but in the aggregate per annum for each of the perils of Flood and Earthquake which in turn excess of the deductibles. i I • The coverage provided by the Excess Insurers is subject to the following Drop-Down Clause: In the event of reduction or exhaustion of the underlying annual aggregata limit(s) in respect of Flood and Earthquake, it is agreed that such insurances an is afforded by the Excess layer(s) shall respond excess of such reduced amount, or in the avant of exhaustion of such underlying amount the Excess layer(s) will respond as underlying insurance. sa/92 a 'Al14:aa nrs r+s;SERVICE 818 772 2796 P,7,aO87i022 m Builders Risk Policy page S � PART A - COVERAGE I. INSURING AGREEMENT: Subject to the limitations, exclusions, terms and conditions contained herein, this Policy insures, in respect of occurrences happening during the term of this Policy, against: '- Physical lama or damage to the property insured, except as excluded hereunder. 2. PROPERTY INSURED: a) AT PROJECT SITES (1) Permanent Works - All , gu m t, machinery and supplies of any a property of the INSURED or o rs the INSURED may have assumed r i ty, value of which has been includ Total Project Cost on the Dacl a or to be used in or incidental tol the di OR n, demolition of existing structures, erection r fabrication and/or reconstruction and/or repair the project insured, commencing When the property becomes at the INSURED'S risk at the sit&, and while there awaiting, during and subsequent to erection and/or fabrication and/or repair and/or testing; (2) Temporary Works - All scaffolding, formwork, fences, shoring, hoarding, falsawork and temporary buildings all incidental to the project and the value of which has been included in the Estimated Total Project Cost on the Declarations Page. b) TRANSIT: Transit coverage shall only apply provided that a specific sublimit is indicated on the Declarations Page with re&peet to ., property to enter into and form a part of the project insured, from the commencement of loading at the original point of shipment anywhere in Canada or the States of the United States of America, its territories and possessions, until arrival at "d the site including shipments on inland or coastal waters but excluding ocean marine shipments. The Insured agrees to keep records of all shipments insured hereunder and make them available to the Insurers upon request. 06/92 '93 z.'44 n78 !NS.SEPVICE 818 772 Z796 P.6iZZ3 aoniu2Y Builders Risk Policy Page c PART A - COVERAGE (Continued) 2 . PROPERTY INSURED: (Continued) b) TRANSIT: (Continued) This coverage shall be void if the Insured enters into any special agreement with carriers, releasing them from their common law or statutory liability or agreeing that this insurance shall in any way inure to the benefit of such carriers; however, the Insured may, without prejudice to this coverage, accept such bills of lading, receipts, or contracts of transportation as are ordinarily i ad by carriers containing a limitation as to the Val operty insured. c) OFF SITE: Off site coverage shall that a specific aubllmit is indicated o e s Page with respect Co property to enter in n fo a of the project insured, anywhere in Can s of the United States of America, its a sseasions, but excluding such property whi n c of manufacturing or processing at the manufactu a plier's site. 3 . LIMITS OF LIABILIT The Insurers shall not be liable for more than the amounts shown in the Declarations, Section 4 , in any one loss or occurrence. The insurance as provided under this Policy shall not be reduced '. by the sum paid in any one loss or occurrence except as respects the perils of Flood and Earthquake. 4 . DEBRIS REMOVAL: a) This Policy covers expenses incurred during the currency of this Policy for the removal of debris of the property covered hereunder which may be occasioned by loss caused by any of the perils insured against in this Policy. However, the total liability under this Polley for loss to property and removal of debris shall not exceed the Limit of Liability stated on the Declarations Page. b) This debris removal coverage does not apply to pollutants and contaminants clean up and removal costs. c) This debris removal coverage does not apply to debris removal expense as excluded under Perils Excluded 1 n) contained herein. i o6/92 "JLiN lb '9Yi!r45 MTS !MS.SER`JICE SIB 772 2796 p,9/Ez9 Vuaivi2 Builders Risk Policy Page 7 i PART A - COVERAGE (Continued) 5. TESTZNGt a) This policy is extended to provide coverage for testing, including, but not limited to, hot tasting, start up, and/or commissioning operations, and including the separate testing of individual components of the entire project. b) The premium stated in this Policy includes a testing period e. as shown on attached Testing Endorsement. Subject to prior notification, it is agreed thnt exti of the period for hot testing shall be covered at exisana olicy rates. ' 6. DEDUCTIBLE: From the amount of each claim o age arising out of one occurrence when finall ere shall be deducted the applicable amount as ed aelarations, and then the liability under this P hal only the amount of such loss ,- in excess there* a limits act forth in the Declarations. ! f a one physical damage deductible applies to a si le e, only the highest deductible will apply to the er s. Deductibles for physical damage and delay in completio sea shall each apply separately. 7. TERMINATION OF LZADILITY: The property referred to herein shall be insured until they project has been formally accepted by the OWNER or the expiry data of the Policy stated on the Declarations Page, or cancellation of the Policy, whichever first occurs. Subject to Insurers' agreement, this Policy may he extended by the NAKED INSURED by payment of additional premium to ba agreed. PART B - EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS THIS POLICY SHALL NOT PAY FOR: 1. PERILS EXCLUDED: a) Consequential lose or damage of any kind or description including loss of market or delay, whether caused by a peril insured or otherwise, but this exclusion shall not apply to delay in completion coverage when it is provided hereunder; b) Cost of making good faulty or defective workmanship or material, but this exclusion shall not apply to physical damage resulting from such faulty or defective workmanship or material; 06/92 •fRfi ±:7 '93 46 MTS II�SD SERVICE 819 772 2796 •��•��� P.10Z Builders Risk Policy Page s P11RT 8 - EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS (Continued) 1. PERILS EXCLUDED: (Continued) c) Loss or damage caused by fault, defect, error or omission in design, plan or specification, but this exclusion shall not apply to physical loss or damage resulting from such fault, defect, error or omission in design, plan or specification; d) Wear and tear, gradual deterioration, inherent vice, latent 4 defect, corrosion, rust, dampness or dryness of the atmosphere, unless direct physical loan) o image by a peril insured ensues and then this Poli cover for such ensuing loss or damage only; e) Loss or damage directl occasioned by, happening through or in invasion, acts of foreign enemies, h i ti r war be declared or not) , civil w 11 revolution, insurrection, military or s ial law or confiscation or m nationalize n i on or destruction of or damage to property by t order of any government or public or local authors f) Lose or damage arising directly or indirectly from nuclear reaction, nuclear radiation or radioactive contamination, however such nuclear reaction, nuclear radiation or radioactive contamination may have been caused; nevertheless if a fire arises directly or indirectly from nuclear reaction, nuclear radiation or radioactive contamination, any , loss or damage arising directly from that fire shall (subject ) to the provisions of this Policy) be covered, excluding however all loss or damage caused by nuclear reaction, nuclear radiation or radioactive contamination arising directly or indirectly from that fire; g) Loss due to disappearance or revealed by inventory shortage alone; h) Infidelity or dishonesty of the Insured or any of the Insured's employees, or persons to whom the insured property is entrusted; i) Loss or damage to insured property while covered by Ocean Marine Insurance or while water-borne in the course of ocean shipment; 06/9a O1/74ti"Z'3 '93 1446 IM?S INS.SERVICE ele 772 2796 .- P. Builders Risk Policy Page 9 PART B - EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS (Continued) 1. PERILS EXCLUDED: (Continued) j) Loss, damage, costs, expenses, fines or penalties incurred or sustained by or imposed on the Insured at the order of any government agency, court or other authority arising from any cause whatsoever beyond the demolition of any damaged portion of the project no longer useful for its intended purpose; k) The expense tot 1. Extract Pollutants and/or Contaminants from the debris or; 2. Extract Pollutants and/or Contaminants To and or water; or 7 . Remove, restore or replace p 1 ontaminated land or water; or 4 . Remove or transport ro abris to a site for storage or decon t reams because the property or .debris is nts and/or Contaminants whether or a , transport, or decontamination ) is required or lation. 1) Debris removal as occasioned by the enforcement of any Federal or any Government Agency, political body or state or municipal law or ordinance which necessitates the demolition of any building or any portion of any building covered hereunder which has not suffered damage by any of the perils insuradl m) Loss or damage covered under any written or implied guarantee or warranty by any contractor, manufacturer or supplier, but only to the extent of recovery from such written or implied guarantee or warranty by such contractor, manufacturer or supplier; n) Lass or damage caused by, resulting from, contributed to or made worse by actual, alleged or threatened release, ® discharge, escape or dispersal of contaminants or pollutants, all whether direct or indirect, proximate or remote or it whole or in part caused by, contributed to or aggravated bl _ any physical damage insured by this Policy; This exclusion shall not apply when loss or damage is directly causad by fire, lightning, aircraft impact, explosion rupture, riot, civil commotion, smoke, vehicle impact. windstorm, hail, vandalism, malicious mischief. 06/91 °1IAN zO '9Y1Y-"47 MTS INS.SERVICE 91S 772 2796 P. 1222012/022 W Builders Risk Policy Page 10 PART B - EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS (Continued) 1. PERILS EXCLUDED: (Continued) o) It is understood and agreed that this policy does not cover the cost of removing asbestos material from property insured, unless the asbestos is itself damaged by a direct physical loss from any external cause covered heroin. However, the Insurers will not pay for the costs to remove the undamaged portion of any asbestos material; or the increased costs of demolishing, rebuilding, repairing or the loss of use of the undamagad portion of property insured, as a result of the enforcement of any law or ordinance regulating asbestos material. 2 . PROPERTY EXCLUDED: a) Land and land values; howeAs n included in the contract bid documents earth to be used in completion of the j t uded; b) Contractors' t unless the value of same is reported t J additional premium 1s paid at a rota to be ' • c) or aircraft; or a ant licensed for highway use, rolling stack, or aircraft; d) Water and watercraft; a) Accounts, bills, currency, stamps, deeds, evidence of debt, checks, money, securities, plans, blueprints, models, renderings, specifications or other property of a similar nature; f) Existing property at the project site unless separately "Glared to the Insurers in advance. PART C - DEFINITIONS 1. NAMED INSURED: The NAMED INSURED shall be deemed the sole and irrevocable agent of each and every INSURED under this Policy for the purpose of: r a) giving to or receiving from the Insurers notice of cancellation; .. b) giving instructions to or agreeing with the Insurers for alterations of this Policy; c) making or receiving payments of premiums or adjustments of premium. e6/92 V a�JFNi Z� 'S3'0 4S MTS INS.SERVICE 918 772 - � 2795 P.13%2_ 13/u[Y Builders Risk Policy Page 11 PART C - DEFINITIONS (Continued) 2. ADDITIONAL INSURED: The ADDITIONAL INSURED shall include all persons, firms or corporations specifically named or falling within the general description stated on the Declarations Page. 3. INSURED: The INSURED shall mean all persons, firms or corporations included as the NAMED INSURED and ADDITIONAL INSURED. 4. FLOOD: Wherever in this Policy the term "f o o*it shall be held to mean: a) A general and tempera mplete inundation of normally dry land fro 1. The overlto o waters; 2. The un 1 accumulation or runoff of surface waters s Cal 3. Mudslides .a. mudflows) which are caused by flooding as defined in subparagraph a) 2. , above and are akin to a river of liquid and flowing mud on the surfaces of normally dry land areas, as when earth is carried by a current of water and deposited along the path of the current; .. 4. Tsunami caused by earthquake or seaquake. b) The collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or other body of water as a result of erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding the cyclical levels which result in flooding as defined in a) 1. above. r S. EARTHDUAXE: 1 Wherever in this Policy the term "earthquake" occurs, it shall include, but not be limited to, shocks, tremors, volcanic action, mud flow, earth rising Or shifting, land slide, subsidence, or any other earth movement. 06/92 u4/TFN 20 'W 15148 MTS INS.SOWICE 818 772 2796 P. 14/2'a14/022 Builders Risk Policy Page 12 PART C - DEFINITIONS (Continued) S. OCCURRENCE: In the event of a loss, disaster or casualty or a series of losses, disasters or casualties caused by one peril insured, acting alone or in combination with other perils insured, there shall be doomed to have been one OCCURRENCE. In respect of the perils of FLOOD and EARTHQUAKE and WINDSTORM, OCCURRENCE Shall mean all losses arising as a result of such FLOOD or EARTHQUAKE or WINDSTORM during a continuous period of seventy-two (721 hours. 7. POLLUTANTS AND/OR CONTAMINANTS1 Any material which, after its release, can ausa or threaten damage to human health or human velfa&, ,.d as or threatens damage, deterioration, loss of val lity or loss of use to property insured hereunder of limited to, bacteria, fungi, virus or h s listed in the -. Federal Water Pollution C Air Act, Resource Conservation and Rac et Toxic Substances Control Act, or ate the U.S. Environmental Protection Age 8. TESTING t a) Hot Testing Any start up, commissioning or other forms of testing making use of any feedstock including operational or performance test. Hot testing shall be deemed to have commenced upon the introduction of feedstock. b) Cold Testing '- Any testing, exclusive of Hot Testing as defined above, including but not limited to electrical, mechanical, hydraulic, hydrostatic, and pneumatic. c) For the purpose of the foregoing definitions, the start up and testing of building systems shall be considered to be Cold Testing. 9. CONSTRUCTION TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT- Contractors' tools and equipment that do not become a Permanent part of the project. r 06/92 O1.JPN E0 '9Y 15:49 NTS INS.SERVItt 91B 772 2796 P. SE2'c41d/022 Builders Risk Policy Page 13 PART C - DEFINITIONS (Continued) 10. INSURANCE MANAGERI The INSURANCE MANAGER is ENCON Underwriting Agency, Inc. acting aa. an agent of the Insurers for the purposes of issuing and Signing this Policy and for the issuing and receiving of notices as provided by this Policy. The INSURANCE MANAGER is not a party to this Policy. PART D - CONDITIONS I. OTHER INSURANCE: If, on the happening of any loss or gs to the property insured, there is in force other covering the same interest, other than excess ins n , olicy shall act as contributory insurance and sh 1 t 1 for more than the proportion of such loss a as the amount of insurance under this the total amount of ,r insurance on the p o sunder whether or not all suchothar ins 4"au— W a Clause. Permission a INSURED to have excess insurance overthe L a ity set forth on the Declarations Page Without prejud a to this policy and the existence of such insurance, i Y, shall not reduce any liability under this Policy. 2. OCCUPANCY: ' Permission is granted for occupancy of the project insured hereunder for the purpose it was intended. 1. PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT: The premium stated on the Declarations Page is provisional. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the project, the NAMED INSURED shall report the Final Total Project Cost to the INSURANCE MANAGER. The actual premium shall be calculated from the inception date of the Policy, on the total cast so reported at rata(s) shown in this Policy. If the premium so calculated exceeds the provisional premium, the NAMED INSURED shall pay to the Insurers the amount of such excess. If such premium is less than the provisional premium, the Insurers shall refund to the NAMED INSURED the amount of the difference, subject to the minimum earned premium stated herein. 4 . CONTROL. This insurance shall not be invalidated by any act or neglect of r, which the INSURED, or any employee of the INSURED, has neither knowledge nor control. 06/92 va JRN 20 '?315 50 MTS INS.SERVICE 61E 772 2756 P.SEi22016/022 Builders Risk Policy Page 16 PART D - CONDITIONS (Continued) 5. CONPORMANCE TO STATUTES: To the extent that any of the provisions of this Policy are governed by federal or state statutes, the comparable provisions of this Policy shall be deemed to be amended in accordance with such statutes. 6. CLAIM AGAINST TRANSIT CARRIER AND/OR BAILEE,. No claim for loss or damage during trans t shall be payable hereunder until the INSURED has filed aim with and made reasonable efforts to secure payme the transporting carrier and the carrier has denied 1 1 7. MISREPRESENTATION If any person or entit yi urance falsely describes the property to the e o usurers or misrepresents or .d fraudulently omi a any circumstances which is material to b a Insurers in order to enable thaw i to judge the a ertaken, this Policy shall be void as I to any propert lation to which the misrepresentation or omission is me 1. S. ERRORS I OMISSIONS, No unintentional Errors or omissions in any intormation required to be reported to the Insurers at the time of inception will prejudice the Insured's right of recovery, but will be reported to the Insurers as soon as practicable when discovered. 9. MATERIAL CHANGE: Any change, material to the risk and within the control and knowledge of the INSURED, which increases the exposure of loss to the Insurers, shall be promptly reported within 30 days in writing to the Insurers. 10. ASSIGNMENT: The Insured agrees not to transfer any legal rights or interests in the Policy without the Insurers' written consent. 11. CHANCY O8 INTEREST: ,r The Insurers shall be liable for loss or damage occurring after an authorized assignment under the Bankruptcy Act of change of title by succession, by operation of law or by death. 06/92 MTS IN9.SET"/ICE 91a 772 2796 P..7 LW47/UEY Builders Risk Policy Page 15 PART D - CONDITIONS (Continued) 12. FRAUD= Any fraud or willfully false statement in a statutory declaration in relation to any of the particulars herein shall invalidate the Claim of the person or entity making the declaration. 13. NOTICE AND DROOP OF LOSS: In the &vent of lose or damage the INSURED shall: a) give written advice thereof to the Insurers within sixty (60) dayal b) protect the property from further lose c) exhibit to any person des all that .� remains of any prope iA1]kkatqr1rs d) produce for 1 unt, bills, invoices and vouche a a Ccuments pertaining to the interest of under or a certified copy thereof if originals b t, at such reasonable time and place as may be designat y the Insurers or their representatives and permit extracts and copies thereof to be made( a) file with the Insurers, within six (6) months from the date of loss, a detailed sworn proof of loss. Failure by the INSURED to report the said loss or damage and to file said sworn proof , of loss an hareinbefore provided, shall invalidate any claim i under this Policy for such loss. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all claims for lose or damage under this Policy must be filed with the Insurers within the sixty (60) day period immediately following the expiration or termination of this Policy. 14. WHO MAY GIVE NOTICE AND PROOF: Notice of loss may be given, and proof of loss may be made, by the Agent of the INSURED in case of absence or inability of the INSURED to give notice or Take the proof, and absence or inability being satisfactorily accounted for, or in the like came, or it the INSURED refuses to do so, by a person to whom any Part of the insurance money is payable. O6/92 O3/7"e0 •93'15:51 MTS INS.SERVICE 218 772 2796 "'Altl/V'LL r - Builders Risk Policy I Page 16 PART D - CONDITIONS (Continued) Is. VALUATION: Claims shall he settled under this Policy on the basis of the actual cost of repair and/or replacement with materials of like kind and quality less BETTERMENT as of the date of loss or damage, but in no event to exceed the Limit of Liability. It is understood that the foregoing shall include overhead and profit in the same proportion as that of the contract bid documents. 16. PARTIAL LASS: The Insurers hereby grant permission to repair any partial damage to the property insured which can be qftni eniontly and advantageously undertaken. The Insur reimburse the INSURED who has suffered the los f Lai cost of such repairs, subject always to th Les and Limits of Liability stated on t 17. DUE DILIGENCE: The INSUM shn d 1 genes and do and concur in doing all things reason practicable to avoid or diminish any lossi of or damage to property herein insured. ... 18. SUBROGATION: If the Insurers pay a claim under this Policy, they will be subrogated, to the extent of such Payment, to all the Insured's rights of recovery from other persons, organizations and entities. The insured will execute and deliver instruments and papers and do whatever else is necessary to secure such rights. ,., The Insurers will have no rights of subrogation against: a) any person or entity, which is a Named Insured or an Additional Insured: b) any other parson or entity, which the Insured has waived its rights of subrogation against in writing before the time of loss) e) notwithstanding the foregoing, it is a condition of this Policy that the Insurers shall be subrogated to all the Insured's rights of recovery against any Arehiteee or Engineer, whether named as an Insured or not, for any loss or damage arising out of the performance of professional services in their capacity as such and caused by any error, omission, deficiency or act of the Architect or Engineer, by any persor eaployed by them or by any others for whose acts they art legally liable. e6/92 ".Ptl �0 '93'15'S2 MTS INS.SftVICE S18 772 2796 P. 19i22a1a,uzz Builders Risk Policy Page 17 PART D - coNDiTioNs (continued) 18. SUBROGATION: (Continued) In no event shall the Insured waive his right of subrogation against architects, engineers and manufacturers/suppliers of equipment or material. The Insured will act in concert with the Insurers and all other interests concerned in the exercise of such rights of recovery. If any amount is recovered as a result of such proceedings, the net amount recovered after deducting the costs of recovery, will accrue first to the Insur in proportion to their respective interests. Any exee is amount will be remitted to the Insured. If h recovery, the interests instituting the pro d the expense of the proceedings proport The Insured w n ess to prejudice such rights of r l9'J APPRAISAL: v/ It the Insured the Insurers fail to agree as to the amount Of loss, each shall, on the written demand of either, made within sixty (60) days after receipt of proof of lose by the Insurers, select a competent and disinterested appraiser, and the appraisal shall be made at a reasonable time and place. The appraisers shall first select a competent and disinterested umpire, and . failing for fifteen (15) days to agree upon such umpire, then an ' the request of the Insured or the Insurers, such umpire shall be i selected by a judge of a court of record in the state in which such appraisal is pending. The appraisers shall than appraise the loss, stating separately the replacement cost at the time of lose and the amount of loss. The Insured and the insurers shall each pay his or their chosen appraiser and shall bear equally the other expenses of the appraisal and umpire. The Insurers shall not be held to have waived any of their rights by any act relating to appraisal. m 06/92 ""7PiV20 '93 15:52 M7S INS.SERVP_E 818 772 279E Builders Risk Policy Page is PLAT D - CONDITIONS (Continued) 20. ENTRY, CONTROL, ABANDONMENT. Attar the loss or damage to the property insured, the Insurers shall have an immediate right of access and entry by accredited agents sufficient to enable them to survey and examine the property, and to make an estimate of the loss or damage and, after the INSURED has secured the property, a further right of access and entry sufficient to enable them to make an appraissaant or particular estimate of the loss or damage, but the Insurers shall not be entitled to the control or possession Of the property insured, and without the neent of the Insurers there can be no abandonment of the insured. 21. SUE AND LABORS In case of loss or e, 1 wful and necessary for the INSURED, his r , ervants and assigns to sue, labor and n a ut the defense, safeguard and -, recovery re arty hereunder or any part thereof without p is insurance, nor shall the acts of the INSURED or ur rs, in recovering, saving and preserving the property IN in case of loss or damage be considered a waiver or an aeeap nee of abandonment. The expenses so incurred shall `a✓ be borne by the INSURED and the Insurers proportionately to the extent of their respective interests. W Any payment made pursuant to their cause, shall not serve to increase the Limit of Liability at the project site, as stated on the Daolarations Page. 22. RECORDS: a) Books and records will he kept by the INSURED in such manner that the total contract price of the operations covered by this Policy and the exact amount of any loss or damage can he accurately determined. b) The INSURED shall allow any person designated by the Insurers to inspect and audit the INSURED'S records at any reasonable time and place and permit extracts and copies thereof to be made. 27 . sUIT AGAINST INSURERS: Every action or proceeding against the Insurers for the recovery Of any claim or by virtue of this Policy shall be absolutely barred unless commenced within one (1) year next after which the loss or damage occurs. O8/92 Vl/7RN 29 '93 1S 53 MTS !H&SERVICE BIB 772 2796 +/V+- P.21 22/ Builders Risk Policy Page 19 PART D - CONDITIONS (Continued) 24. INSPECTION: The Insurers may inspect the property insured at any reasonable time at the Insurers' option. These inspections are for the benefit of the Insurers only. The Insurers' right to inspect or make any inspection neither states nor implies that the INSORED'S property or operations are safe, harmless to health or in full compliance with any laws, rules and regWivons. 25. NOTICES: It is agreed that any t e a by this Policy to be given to the in given by the INSURED to the INSURANCE erwriting Agency, Inc. , 11177 Merit Drive, 00, 1 a, Texas 75251. 16. CANCELLATIONAA r Thia Policy cancelled by the NAMED INSURED or by the Insurers, by ma' i or delivering to the other at the address shown on the icy, stating when such cancellation shall be effective. `-� Cancellation by the insurers shall not be sooner than ninety (90) days thereafter, unless such cancellation is for non-payment of premium in which case coverage provided by this Policy shall cease ton (10) days after written notice has been mailed or delivered by the Insurers. The mailing or delivery of notice as aforesaid, shall be sufficient proof of notice and the date and . hour of cancellation stated in the notice shall terminate ' coverage under this policy. Earned premium shall be computed pro rate and unearned premium, if any, shall be returned to the NAMED INSURED as aocn as practicable. in the event of cancellation of the Policy by the NAMED INSURED prior to the completion of the project, the earned premium shall be computed in accordance with the customary short rate table and subject to the minimum earned premium stated on the Declarations Page. Cancellation shall not affect coverage on any shipment in transit on the data of cancellation. coverage will continue in full force until such property is delivered and accepted. 06192 f I. GENERAL STATEMENT As cost control is a major concern for the Districts, contractor is instructed to quote Course of Construction described below as a separate line item, which will be deducted if the Districts elect to provide the Course of Construction coverage. H. COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION INSURANCE 1) Contractor shall provide a separate line item quote for "all-risk" ,r course of construction insurance naming as the insured the interests of the owner/districts and all contractors/sub-contractors, as their interests may appear, in all property materials which will become a part of the entire structure at one hundred percent (100%) of the replacement value. Policy deductible shall not exceed $10,000. 2) The contractor responsible to provide as part of this policy coverage for the perils of earthquake and flood. Earthquake deductible shall not exceed 5% of the value at risk at the time of the loss. Flood deductible shall not exceed $50,000. A) Earthquake Limit $10,000,000 `.. B) Flood Limit $10,000,000 3) The course of construction policy will exclude contractor's equipment, tools, appliances and other property owned, rented or used by the contractor which does not become a part of the completed structure. 4) At its sole option, the Districts may elect to provide the course of construction coverage as described above. If such option is exercised the contractor will credit the Districts' account with the line item amount listed for course of construction coverage. .. 5) If the Owner/Districts provides coverage, the contractor will be responsible for a deductible amount $10,000 on each and every loss except for the perils of Earthquake and Flood which the District will assume. r rT 3101/93-CWOC\CRS-CSTR.ITT r EVIDENCE OF PROPERTY INSURANCE DAM �03/02/93 THIS IS EVIDENCE THAT INSURANCE AS IDENTIFIED BELOW HAS BEEN ISSUED. IS IN FORCE.AND CONVEYS ALL THE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES AFFORDED UNDER THE POLICY. _. woueEn cosrrar ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOCIATES Zurich Insurance Company a� 3636 BIRCH STREET #230 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 (714) 756-0271 Dole W&COOE uexmen Eons ease suaaFa County Sanitation Districts of Orange County r P.O. Box 8127 ET An laaoa+n Fountain Valley, CA 92728 oaEav�a ma xEsucea wem EeDDxe ouEo: PROPERTY INFORMATION LOcenDaoE6lAVMn AS RESPECTS: Project address and description. i COVERAGE INFORMATION � <YOOxr Of DellRelOE oFOUCna1E 1 "All Risk' Builder's Risk and Earthquake and Flood. t15.000,000 ' See Below eductible: $10,000 All Other Perils $50,000 Flood 5% of Total Values at risk at time of lose for Earthquake. $100,000 minimum applies. i ! REMARKS(including Special ConORlmm) Sublimits: S10,000,000 Per Occurrence and Aggregate Earthquake r $10,000,000 Per Occurrence and Aggregate Flood $500,000 Transit $500,000 Offaite Storage $5,000,000 Debris Removal $250,000 Expediting Expense $1,000,000 Extra Exnensa .CANCELLATION THE POLICY IS SUBJECT TO THE PREMIUMS. FORMS.AND RULES IN EFFECT FOR EACH POLICY PERIOD. 3S�O5 THE POLICY BE TERMINATED.THE COMPANY WILL GIVE THE ADDITIONAL INTEREST IDENTIFIED BELOW WRITTEN NOTICE.AND WILL SEND NOTIFICATION OF ANY CHANGES TO THE POLICY THAT WOULD AFFECT THAT INTEREST.IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS OR AS REQUIRED BY LAW. ADDITIONAL INTEREST '��wJ1E um,wORfn wNMe OvwrEeEeT ntractor aoe'a'wEe , AOOInONALe D LOSS MA E Oi Fn sawiuee ac wunasof o assn or coenwr I rI ACORD 2712/88) ` y�/YI93 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS � cH County Sanaaaon Districts P.O.Box 127.10844 EIIIS Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain valley,CA 9272MI27 ,4 Telephone:(714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA APRIL 14, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: (4)(a) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file Resolution No. 93-252 from the Board of Supervisors re change in appointment of active and alternate representatives, as follows: Districts Active Director Alternate Director 1,2,3 & 11 Roger R. Stanton William G. Steiner 5,6,7,13 & 14 William G. Steiner Roger R. Stanton In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (18) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items: (a) Consideration of items pertaining to Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040 (1) Verbal report of Staff (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated April 8, 1993 (Copy attached) (3) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to issue a �J purchase order to Sur-Lite Corporation in an amount not to exceed $129,400.00 for Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040 ` COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 01 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA k April 8, 1993 1a Buy%se VENUE PC FOUWA N VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92729-9127 p1A1952.2A11 STAFF REPORT Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants 1 and 2. Specification No. R-040 At both treatment plants, the Districts have installed flares for the burning of excess digester gas in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) operating requirements. This gas, a byproduct of the sewage treatment process, will be the fuel used in our new Central Power Generation project. After Central Power Generation is operational, the flares will only be needed for standby, to burn the gas if Central Power Generation facilities are off line. The flares were installed under several contracts. The most recent, completed in January, included four new flares. They were purchased separately from the manufacturer by the Districts and installed by a construction contractor. In total, the Districts operate six flares, three at each plant, all manufactured by Sur-Lite Corporation of Santa Fe Springs, California, which is the only commercial manufacturer approved by SCAQMD to meet the stringent standards of "best available control technology" established for flaring wastewater treatment plant digester gas. The Districts received permits to construct (PTC) from SCAQMD to construct the flare systems. They had been operating successfully in a trial period; however, recent emission testing performed to confirm compliance with SCAQMD requirements have shown that the flares are exceeding the permitted emission level of oxides of nitrogen, an air pollutant that contributes to smog formation. The two flares tested (one at each plant) were inspected by the manufacturer, who discovered that the burners were deformed by high heat. In order to preclude the issuance of a notice of violation by SCAQMD, staff immediately filed for a variance under the SCAQMD "breakdown" rule. The variance was granted for 30 days effective, Monday, March 15. On an emergency basis, staff issued a purchase agreement under its procurement authority for replacement burners from Sur-Lite for two flares (one at each plant), at a cost of approximately $25,000. With the purchase agreement the flare manufacturer (Sur-Lite) also agreed to investigate and define the cause of extreme temperature conditions currently being experienced that apparently damaged the flares, and to make appropriate recommendations for a remedy. Sur-Lite has completed their investigation and made substantial i modifications to the flare at each plant that had failed the test. Among other problems, staff believes that the original design and control mechanisms for the flares may not have been satisfactory. (These were not furnished by Sur-Lite.) �...� The control system for the flares is very complicated, at best, and an inexact, cutting-edge technology. Because our use of the digester gas is highly valuable today, depending upon how many of our existing engines and boilers are operating, the gas flow conditions that the flares and their controllers must face are highly variable. Because of these wide ranging conditions, the Districts had been operating the flares with a higher temperature to ensure that the SCAQMD minimum temperature requirement of 14000 F would not be violated. This may have contributed to burner problems. The high temperatures have now been lowered due to reconfiguration of the flares and changes to the flare operating parameters. Emission tests have been performed on the two modified flares and, as of this writing, the flare at Plant 2 has passed. The Plant 1 flare has yet to pass, possibly because of control problems. Sur-Lite will continue to investigate, define and correct the problem with the Plant 1 flare and conduct a re-test. Sur-Lite recommends that the remaining four flares be inspected and any damaged burners be replaced and the flares modified to match the Plant 2 flare which is now in compliance. These modifications include a new burner configuration with more burners and relocation of temperature-sensing thermocouples. Additionally, Sur-Lite recommends the addition of two more thermocouples at each flare and changes to the control program. Staff believes Sur-Lite is best qualified to make the required inspections and repairs because of their experience in the design of these flares. Actual costs will not be known until the inspections and repairs are complete; however, full burner replacement and necessary control modifications (not a part of the original Sur-Lite purchase order) should not exceed $115,000. Also, staff recommends that Sur-Lite perform monthly inspections, in an additional amount not to exceed $600 per month, to ensure that the flares remain in adequate operating condition to achieve consistent long-term compliance with SCAQMD's operating requirements. This price includes a substantial discount to the Districts as compensation for experiencing the above problems. However, Sur-Lite has not been requested to pay the entire repair and replacement cost because the higher temperatures and other control changes made by the Districts may also have contributed to the flare problems. Staff recommends authorization to issue a purchase order to Sur-Lite Corporation for Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040, in an amount not to exceed $115,000.00 plus $600 per month for monthly inspection for up to a two-year period, for a total amount not to exceed $129,400.00 plus tax. Staff is applying for an extension of the operating variance provided by SCAQMD to allow time to repair the remaining flares. wpEoc\en9\R-000\000893.er -2- REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN 4-28-93 1 ► Presentation of Plaque and Resolution to Retiring Supervisor/Director Don R. Roth. 2) Upcoming Meetings A. Fiscal Policy Committee - The Fiscal Policy Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday. April 21 st. at 5:30 p.m. B. Conservation, Recycle & Reuse Committee - The Conservation, Recycle & Reuse Committee is scheduled to meet on Tuesday. April 27th. at 11 :30 a.m. at SCAQMD offices in Diamond Bar. C. Executive Committee - The Executive Committee is scheduled to meet on Wednesday, April 28th, at 5:30 p.m. Invite two of the following Directors to attend and participate in the discussions: Barry Hammond and Frank Laszlo -or- Victor Leipzig or Tom Lutz -Item 2 Continued on Next Page- —� D. Personnel Commmittee - The Personnel Committee is scheduled to meet on Thursday. April 29th, at 5:30 p.m. - End of Report - w pd o c\g m\jcrpt s93\jc04.01 MErnNGDATE 04/14/93 Tw1E 7:30 P.M. owns rs 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13 S 14 DISTRICT 1 Nel#03 IJOINTER BOARDS ILURI ....... RKSIAADSON ... meIBEYERI . ... ..... BAMEM ..... IBEYEPI ...... BARREM ...... ,0 IDENESI HAUN .... BELL . ....... ✓ IPEAOEI . ..... RDBWMAN .... JL IscoU......... GRN ...... IPormousl.... SALTaREw .... scorn ......... mums ..... JC — ISTEINERI ..... 6TANTON ..... IOESA. ......... COX —........ .� (NELSONS ....... DEBAY....... J� _ DISTIIICf 2 )f FRIM .NI ........ BBNMR...... A� _ IOULTn . . .MSONI ... WEDAA ....... r IRICD ........... EVANPERRY AN ... � — (S R) . . . .. . COLLNS ...... AL IPEAOEI ......... RORA ... . — IBEYEPI ...... BARKER....... JL IMAHONEVI....... ROM ....... JL IDENES) ...... BELL ......... JG IBROWNI......... GROFIN ...... J/ _ IMcCIANAHAJ4. GTLM ....... 1L IWEDAAI .. OULLaSOIL ... — IFLOMI .. MAHOMEV ..... 40-0 (WARM . .. MMMOND (ECKENRODS .. MINUEND.MARIA gC (Cox) .. . . . .... .. HART. . ...... _ (PARKER) ..... NELSON....... .Mev IAOE1 . . . . . ... ... KEPPY ....... — WALYI ....... POPULAR....... L (FORSYTHE) ...... U1ZBL0 ...... (LUTZ) ....... . . ISILVAI . .. . S II ..... M (RIOIA ...... FP ISDIGER( ...... KLAKET . . . . . .. �/ (FLOR I .. ....... MAH2 10N EY........... (UNNI ..... ...... MWER .. DISTRIff] IECKENRODEI ..... MORENO. MMRI A.. /(AARTINE .... AHEN . ...... Al PULDO) . . ....... MORENO.TIED A — IIMIMEeLG90AMMI N.N..II..... IY ....... . [PARADE ........ NELSON ................... GRN ....... . (OUNILAR PARKER (SCOTn ...... COLLINS .... MALY) .......... PNXA .... . RICE)RICE) ........ EN ( UCMTn .. PONnOUS MAHONM.... IALTARELLO . .. PAD ELT GRN ....... &U Z) ........ MILBIB ......ROWI....IAGE) — _—_........ KERRY . ....... ..JG ILUTp .......... EwRARUSOLI _— IFU HARDS ... LASZLO ....... : I (IDPOEBMATIO)US..I....... SANSO Ew .::GHCHaRDSOM LUTE ......... Y ....... SANE .. ILINNI . .. ..... M01ER ........ (MAPTNES....... SAPMN .... (DALYI ... ... %OILER ....... IROBrtAIIw ...... SttVA .... (POBITAILLEI ... SILVA ........ _ RLAKETI ........ MGM ...... RIAKETI .. SINGER ....... JL ISTENM ........ STANTON .... �� ISTENERI . ... . STANTON ..... J/ ISTANTONI ....... STEINEP...... IBATESI . .. . .. SYLVIA . ... ... JL IMILLERI ......... SWAN . ..... IBATESI ......... 6YLVU ..:: DISTRICTS IPEPMISOM ..7 . WAHNEP ... IDEMYI .... .. SCOXAN ✓ N IOULLMSON) ...... WEDAA .. . —_ IDEMYI . .. . STET .. T ISINGM..ROBITAIE ...... WINO(ELL .. ISTANTONI . . . . STEINEP....... � � (SINGES ......... ZIAKET ..... r STAFF OTHERS DISTRICT. ... . . . WANNER ...... IP SY�TER . JL �M. ICOKI ... . . . . . HART......... .e BROWN....— ANWAR(STANTON) . . . . STENER....... .L ANDERSON . j DEMO( .... CLAWSON-JL REENaw... DISTRICT T DAWES...._,f MHSIER .. _ ISALTARELUI .. PULKETT ...... ✓ GORCZYCA .JL HOUGH.... MSENSTAS HOWARD .. _ (SCHER) ... WAHNEfl . . .. . . HODGES ... NUM ..... . :SANSO . . . . . . MPIIEM . . .. . . WARD) . . . . DE BAY. . . . . . . . UNDER " LEE . " " �� AVARDI . ... .. HORENO, . . LINGER ....�- LEE . ROM IPULD01 . ... .. MOPENO,TED . . �� ti NELLOP ...AZ LYNCH .OM ISTANTON) .. .. STENER. ...... NICHOLS...� LYNCH .... _ DOTER .. SHAW _ DISTRICT 11 SIIMPSO OUNO.... IROBITAILLEI ... WNCHELL ..... . TREE VINCED ... . . . N STEINERI . . . .. STANTON ..... WN,SO,R.•�..,,M, %pi^ p� CA44� I E ..... OULLC(S .. ISERI .... PRKR.k ...... DUNLA ..... PP ....... (DALY) ... . . . . PICKUP F/^•^�{rF ....... l ISTANTONI ... . STEINER....... . / ro- '- DISTRICT 1A IVAI I"^� IMILLEPI .. . ... SWAN . . ...... We IP ER) . . .. . PGNTIDUB ... _ IBAM) . . . . . . HAAMMONMOND .... ...... (STANTON) . . _ STANT . . . . BTFINEP....... . 6/10/93 REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING. AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUT/EESS. 4 .}- DATE: - I — i AGENDA ITEM NO. NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) /�U M1C/�'� HOME ADDRESS: �3 U J Wl �N �I�� D L (NUMBER STREET) B -H . CA q(o21l (CITY ZIP CODE TELEPHONE: LZI-j3 co 5-3i� (o-7 rr7 REPRESENTING: 5LtSE� (SELF OR NAME OF ORGANIZATION) F28A PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY April 14 , 1993 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM Please Print Please Print 6hG ARD czuk K S DE✓eL0FtlQJ T COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 100U ELLI9 AVENUE AO SOX B127 FOUNI.N VLL Y.GUFOANN 92MA127 n1n 9624A11 March 18, 1993 STAFF REPORT UPDATE ON THE DISTRICTS' PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROGRAM REQUIRED BY AB 2588 (THE TOXIC NOT SPOTS INFORMATION AND ASSESSMENT ACT) BACKGROUND The Toxic Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act (AB 2588) was adopted by the California Legislature in 1987. AS 2588 required specified facilities to inventory and report their emissions of toxic compounds to the regional Air Quality Management Districts. Facilities with emissions determined to be significant were required to perform a health risk assessment to assess their impact, if any, on the adjacent community and workers. Owners of facilities where the theoretical risk is determined to be significant, are required to notify the affected residents. The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) are subject to AS 2588 and complied by submitting an emissions inventory report to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) . The Districts then volunteered to perform a health risk assessment to determine any impact of our emissions on the community. The results of our studies, which were submitted to SCAQMD in May of 1991, indicate that certain residents surrounding our two treatment plants (a total of approximately 300 houses) , have a theoretical risk of contracting cancer greater than 30-in-a-million, which is the potential impact threshold established by SCAQMD. At the October 28, 1992, Executive Committee Meeting, Staff informed the Directors about the October 2, 1992, adoption of the AS 2588 public notification guidelines by the SCAQMD Board of Directors; and about the requirements to notify the impacted community about the results of our health risk assessment reports which were prepared for each treatment plant in 1990. The 300t homes that may be impacted includes households in Huntington Beach, across the street from Plant No. 2 on Brookhurst, and households in Costa Mesa which are on the east side of the Santa Ana River, across from Plant No. 1 (see attached maps) . No households in Fountain Valley or Newport Beach are within the 10- in-a-million theoretical risk level and we, therefore, have no notification obligations under AS 2588. Staff Report: Public Notification Program March 18, 1993 Page 2 of 3 The adopted SCAQMD guidelines require owners of facilities that pose a theoretical risk to the community of 10-in-a-million to send a public notification letter to affected residents which will be written by SCAQMD and distributed by the facility. In addition, public meetings must be held for those residents in the affected community to communicate the results of the health risk assessment reports, provide any additional relevant information, answer questions, and receive community input. SCAQMD staff will monitor the public meetings and will also be available to answer questions. The SCAQMD guidelines give affected facilities' owners the option to send a separate letter with the SCAQMD notice to communicate any additional information that they feel is necessary. However, SCAQMD reserves the right to review and approve any such letter that is sent with their notice. In October 1992, the Executive Committee authorized and directed staff to prepare a facility letter for distribution. The Executive Committee expressed interest in reviewing the letter before it was sent out if the notification schedule would allow it. STATUS OF PUBLIC NOTIFICATION LETTER AND PUBLIC MEETING: We cannot provide the notification letters and hold the public notification meetings until SCAQMD has approved our health risk assessment reports which we submitted to them in May 1991. To date, our reports have not been approved. However, we expect this to occur soon because other industries have recently received approval of their health risk assessments. We are obligated to conduct the public meetings 30-days after our reports have been approved. In preparation for the public meetings, staff has developed presentation materials on the results of our air toxic emissions testing and health risk assessments. A modified version of this presentation has been given to Districts' employees. The employee presentations have provided staff with valuable feedback that will be used to prepare the presentations to the public. Staff is also proposing to give separate presentations to key staff for the cities of Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Costa Mesa and Newport Beach. Staff Report: Public Notification Program March 18, 1993 ...i Page 3 of 3 STATUS OF NOTIFICATION SCAQMD, at its September Board of Directors meeting, provided a draft of their proposed public notification letter that will be distributed to residents by the impacted facilities (copy attached) . However, this letter is only a draft, and to date, has not been finalized. Based upon SCAQMDs' draft notification letter, staff has prepared a draft of the proposed Districts' letter for review and comment by the Directors (copy attached) . Staff's purpose for the facility letter is to provide supplemental information to the community about who we are, what we do, how the risk we pose compares to other everyday risks, what we have done to control air emissions, and what we plan to do to reduce emissions in the future. The date of mailing and public meetings will be fixed once Air Quality Management Districts approves the health risk assessment and directs us to distribute the notice. EMT:dk Attachments Ref#:340042 .rp South Coast AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 21865 E Copley Dnve, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 (714) 396-2000 PROPOSED SAMPLE NOTIFICATION LETTER [date] Dear Neighbor. Under state law known as the Air Toxia "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB 2588), some facilities identified by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (District) are required to inform their neighboring area of potential health risks associated with the facility's routine emissions of toxic air pollutants. This letter is to inform you that [facility name], located at [facility address], releases compounds which in sufficient quantities may cause potential health effects. Other homes or businesses in your general neighborhood (as shown in the attached map) are also receiving this letter. Receipt of this letter does not mean that this facdity is in violation of any District rules. As part of its routine operations, [facility name] [uses and] emits substances such as [emitted substance(s)] into the air [to produce product or service]. Tbese emitted substances are toxic air pollutants and your exposure to these substances may increase your chance of [contracting cancer and/or experiencing health effects]. The estimated long-term risk is based on [facility name]'s [year] reported emissions and the assumptions that: 1) exposure as a resident is 24 hours a day, 365 days per year, for 70 years or, as a worker in the area, for 8-9 hours a day, 251 days per year, for 40-46 years, and 2) exposure is at the point outside the facility where its emission impacts are the greatest <Based on these assumptions, your added risk of contracting cancer may be increased by [ten, one hundred, one thousand,etc] but less than [upper limit based on facility risk assessment rounded to nearest 10] chances in a million. If the above assumptions for long-term exposure do not apply to and/or are different for you, your risk of cancer could be lower, accordingly. In order to give you an idea of different risk levels, the attached figure will provide you with risks associated with other sources or activities for comparison. While marry of these risk levels are rough estimates, we hope that it helps you to better understand the cancer risk estimates.> <Your long-term exposure to emissions from [facility name] may also increase the possibility that you experience [state adverse chronic health effect(s)]. If the above assumptions for long-term exposure do not apply to and/or are different for you, your risk of these health effects could be lower, accordingly.> <In addition, your short-term exposure to emissions from [facility name] may also __ increase the possibility that you experience [state adverse acute health efrect(s)]. This statement assumes that you will be exposed to maximum emissions for approximately one hour or more at the point outside the facility where its emission impacts are the greatest If these conditions do not apply to and/or are different for you,your risk could be lower, accordingly.> As a result of measures voluntarily undertaken by the facility, required by District rules, or due to other reasons, the facility's present air toxic emissions and resulting potential health risk may be different than what is indicated in this notice. The District as well as state and federal governments have many programs to reduce the public's exposure to toxic air pollutants. In addition, data obtained through the AB 2588 program will be used to direct future development of rules and programs at the District To find out more about these programs, please write or call the District at the address provided below. For more information regarding the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program, please refer to the enclosed information sheet If you have additional questions regarding the procedure or requirements for compliance with the state law for AB 2588, please contact: Toxics Branch/Stationary Source Compliance SCAQMD 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California 91765 (714)396-3600. The health risks mentioned in this notice are summarized in a document known as a health risk assessment which is prepared by the facility and reviewed by the District and state health experts. The facility's health risk assessment document is available for your review at the District headquarters library at the above address. If you have questions related to the facility operations, please contact [facility contact name] at [phone number]. If you are interested in attending a public meeting to discuss the information in this letter or are interested in having a copy of the facility's health risk assessment document placed at your local library, please fill out and return the enclosed postcard. Note: Businesses receiving this notice should post it in an area(s)where it is most likely to be viewed and easily read by employees. ' N,ICs�1af�E�J: -This is A GQrn��(1y- .�(f,-� ' 94 f[a MA. f/)nf�Gl 416�� -i- ma M^n loo' I�1y—. fYO� � Q iN � { -ra . $A�i I��wiia� , ii '•; i •• n �l7 ,"e' tC n pa;•�-i • u ar �c F $1, I�A. ' I •9�NN �•,� per • � '' iy yyi� '�i ;t '> ur •• �:r'e� .. u-.._ M �^q�(�1��+` �,_Lf a q� • � _ m ', fW, �(A�•,: � e• AV 6 - If'j �9d MOIi M f. ;e 2 \ •d VALLEY 2 etvo i- `•N�,aS I < uw.tvll••x.i ' 1 ,a.,Mi I • � Jillrr �,�, G 1 � '•n G' • fi, S'�y' �'a•, � / � i rFp �. AGs rr .L .I+"^I :, G.� � br. _� _ I �i� — �"_ . � •l 6/; n _!`' • _ e% 1L..�m�ai ICgr 8 —9 _- J �._ "' off. • �py��� 4 ,r.... � � 'a.P i I r,a sE $ e r 'lip N 4 : "7'.,1A .9n ••,-�',, a x `ya + _9 • yy r• . s ii AN A.� G,'I lli� . $ jl .. i , •.„g 11'�""tr d"G[i l�'I iAlev $ I!H ' $ae yMAP �Added Lifetime Risk > (per million people exposed) Ambient Am6MnI M1200 In-Cor . 72 Imtnr 220 F, ON SIDO 3 ,,oy 10 Gas Station 3 Maximum Individual Lifetime Cancer Risk 1500 1\ Facility 10 M \\ ADDED r.rx-ETEAF RISK This figure depicts maximum individual lifetime cancer risks associated with four environments: ambient, in-car, gas station and [facility name]. The actual risk at any location ranges from zero to the maximum value presented. Ambient Ambient refers to the surrounding environment, specifically the air breathed in daily. The California Air Resources Board and the District operate ten toxic air monitoring stations throughout the South Coast Air Basin. Of these ten stations, five complete data sets of air concentrations of select air pollutants have been gathered. The maximum individual lifetime cancer risk from ambient air in the South Coast Air Basin is calculated to range from 600 to 1,300 chances in a million based on measured concentrations at these monitoring sites. The cancer risk calculated assumes that the maximum exposed individual breathes measured concentrations of ambient air continuously for 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, and 70 years. In-Car In-car refers to the commuting environment, specifically the air breathed in while driving a car. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the District sponsored a study in 1989 to characterize the air in motor vehicles during one's commute. The maximum individual lifetime cancer risk from air in a motor vehicle during one's commute in the South Coast Air Basin is calculated to be 72 chances in a million. The cancer risk calculated assumes that the maximum exposed individual breathes the 1989 measured concentrations of commuter air continuously for the entire commute, which is assumed to last 1 hour per day, 365 days per year, and 70 years. Gas Station Gas station refers to the re-fueling environment, specifically the air breathed in while refueling a car at a gasoline station. The U.S. EPA and District sponsored a study in 1990 to characterize the breathing zone of individuals refueling their personal cars at self-serve gasoline stations. The maximum individual lifetime cancer risk from air at a gasoline station while refueling one's car in the South Coast Au Basin is calculated to be 3 chances in a million. The calculated cancer risk assumes that the maximum exposed individual breathes the 1990 measured concentrations associated with refueling a car continuously for the entire refueling period, which is assumed to last 15 minutes per week, 52 weeks per year, and 70 years. Facili Facility refers to the surrounding environment, specifically the air breathed in while living or working near [facility name] that emits specific substances into the air. The state Au Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act (AB 2588) requires all facilities emitting specific substances into the air to inventory their emissions. The facility cancer risk calculated from these inventories assumes that the individual breathes projected air concentrations continuously for 24 hour per day, 365 days per year, and 70 years as a resident at a point outside the facility _ where the facility's emission impacts are greatest. DRAFT DATE Dear Neighbor, Pursuant to the provisions of the California Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987, the Orange County Sanitation Districts have conducted a study to determine the theoretical health risks, if any, associated with air emissions from our [Fountain Valley or Huntington Beach] treatment plant. The purpose of our writing to you is to is to notify you of the results of that study. We are pleased to inform you that the study results indicate that the risk level is consistent with what regulators consider acceptable for our type of facility. Enclosed is a legal notice from the South Coast Air Quality Management District discussing the issue of air contaminants. Because legal notices can be difficult to understand and may prompt additional questions, we are also providing you with the enclosed pamphlet to help interpret what these air contaminants are, where they come from, how health risk is determined, just what it means, and what we do to reduce any air emissions from our treatment plant. We have also included a general information pamphlet to provide you with more information about the Sanitation Districts. To learn even more about this issue, we encourage you to attend a community gathering being held for your convenience on DATE at PLACE at TIME. This meeting will also provide our staff with the opportunity to hear your views that will help us plan and manage our facilities that are so vital to protecting public health and the environment, and continue to be good neighbors. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but would like more information, please contact our Public Information Office at (714) 962-2411, ext. 2055. DO AIR CONTAMINANTS POSE A HEALTH RISK? "CLEARING THE AIR" RISK ASSESSMENT STUDY RESULTS BY THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Who are the Orange County Sanitation Districts? We are a public agency that manages the regional wastewater facilities that collect, treat and safely dispose of wastewater and its residuals for 2.1 million county residents and businesses. We have a treatment plant located in Fountain Valley on Ellis Avenue at the San Diego Freeway, and one located in Huntington Beach on Brookhurst Street near Pacific Coast Highway. Our sole mission is to protect public health and the environment, including Orange County's precious coastal water resources. Why are we providing you with this information? State law, AB2588, the "Air Toxic 'Hot Spots' Information and Assessment Act of 1987," directed many business and public facilities to conduct studies every two years and determine the health risks associated with air contaminants and to inform the Air Quality Management District (AQMD) and the public of the results. The Sanitation Districts' first study was conducted in 1990 and submitted to the AQMD for review in 1991 . The AQMD has now finished their evaluation of the information and authorized it to be disseminated to the public. Where do these air contaminants come from? Air contaminants are released from the wastewater that comes from homes and businesses just like yours. Some of them, like ammonia and hydrogen sulfide, are inherent in wastewater. Others, like organic compounds and metal particles, come mostly from industry, but some come from household products like cleaners, 1 solvents and paint. Another, chlorine, is added to your drinking water supply to make it safe and it is also added at the wastewater treatment plant for disinfection and to prevent odors. Why are there treatment plant emissions? Emissions are released at certain steps in the processing of wastewater, which is done in accordance with strict federal and state regulations. Our multi-step treatment process is similar to nature's way of cleaning wastewater. As we remove and treat solid organic material from the wastewater, we use aeration or other processes that cause turbulence. These processes cause some contaminants in the water or solids to evaporate into the atmosphere. Some of the gas that is produced during treatment of the solids is disposed of by burning which also contributes to air emissions. Some is used as an energy source to operate the plants. What kind of air contaminants do the plants emit? These emissions include volatile organic compounds, hydrogen sulfide, chlorine, ammonia and possibly metal particles. How are the health risks determined? In most cases, scientists use data compiled from tests on laboratory animals and then apply the numbers to humans using very conservative assumptions and "factors of safety," to estimate the theoretical human risk of exposure. Because scientists are uncertain whether humans would have the same health response to chemicals as the laboratory animals, they use very conservative and protective assumptions. How can exposure to air emissions pose a health risk? Laboratory tests on animals, and experiences in a limited number of industrial settings, indicate that some emissions have the potential to pose immediate or 2 long-term health effects, including cancer. Possible contact can come from breathing, touching or eating. But, the effects of exposure depends on many factors including location relative to the source; the strength of the emission; how long and how often a person is exposed to the source; and how sensitive one is based on age and general health condition. What kind of exposure is used to determine potential health risk? Regulators use "maximum exposure" to calculate the health risk potential. A person would receive maximum exposure if they were to stand in one place and receive continuous exposure to a maximum concentration (breathing it, eating and touching it) 24 hours a day for 365 days a year, for 70 years. What do regulators consider as "acceptable risk?" There is no consistent value agreed upon by health experts. The risk limits used by local, state and federal agencies to establish human health protection regulations range between 1-in-l-million to 100-in-1-million. The South Coast Air Quality Management District considers a risk of less than 10-in-a-million acceptable for a facility. How do these health risks compare to everyday activities in Orange County7 Deaths over a 70-year lifetime Smoking 84,000 in-l-million people Alcohol 3,500 in-1-million people Diagnostic Medical X-Rays 1,400 in-l-million people 4 tbsp/day peanut butter 700 in-l-million people 1 pt milk/day 140 in-1-million people 1/2 Ib/wk charcoal broiled steak 21 in-1-million people 3 Here are some other lifetime cancer risks associated with breathing air across the entire South Coast Air Basin over 70-year lifetime. Surrounding air - 1,300 in-l-million people (24 hours, 365 days) Commuting in car - 72 in-1-million people 1 hr/day, 365 days) Refueling at a gas station - 1 in-l-million people (15 min/wk, 52 wks/yr) According to calculated estimates, what is the theoretical cancer risk from air emissions from the treatment plants? The theoretical risk of contracting cancer due to "maximum exposure" to air contaminants from the treatment plant is 10-in-l-million people. What about other health effects? The risk of suffering non-cancer, immediate health effects (i.e., respiratory problems) or long term health effects (damage to an organ or organ system) is .... determined by a "Hazard Indicie, (HI)." The HI is a hypothetical risk calculation using maximum exposure and coming up with a ratio when the exposure dosage is divided by the safe dosage. A ratio equalling less than 1.0 is considered by regulators to pose no health effects. The HI for those living around the treatment plants is less than 0.32, which is 3 times lower than what is considered acceptable. What has been done to control air emissions from the plants? In the past five years, the Sanitation Districts have spent more than $80 million on plant improvements to control air emissions and odors. In addition, we have significantly reduced the amount of toxic pollutants industry discharges into the sewer system. Most of our treatment plant facilities are now enclosed or covered to trap emissions, which are then processed through air scrubbers. 4 �./ We are also constructing Central Power Generation facilities that will replace 28 internal combustion engines with eight new, state-of-the-art, clean-burning engines and electric motors, which will essentially eliminate the need to burn excess gas, and we've installed more efficient gas-burning flares. These facility will significantly reduce emissions of criteria pollutants such as oxides of nitrogen and carbon monoxide. What is being done to reduce air emissions in the future? In addition to the capital improvement costs, we spend about $8 million a year on air quality improvement measures. We are creating an Air Quality Risk Reduction Program that will outline a long-term plan to further modify treatment facilities and operational practices; enhance industrial source control efforts to reduce the discharge from industry of toxic pollutants; and explore new technology. We have a continuing commitment to install the best available technology on all new treatment process. Can we completely stop emissions? No. We must continue to operate the treatment plant to provide essential wastewater management services for Orange County to protect public health and the environment. Unfortunately, there is no existing technology that can completely remove all emissions. We do, however, build and operate our treatment plants using state-of-the-art techniques. Is there anything the public can do to help reduce contaminants from entering the treatment plants? Yes. Hazardous chemicals found in household cleaning supplies cannot be removed during the treatment process and can eventually end up in the air. It is important that you and your neighbors try to reduce the use of household hazardous products and dispose of them safely. The first step is to shop wisely. 5 You can recognize hazardous materials by looking for key words on the label-- corrosive, flammable, reactive, or poison. Try to use less harmful or more natural v cleaning products like vinegar, borax, lemon, and baking soda. For more information contact our Public Information Office at (714) 962-2411 extension 2055. afeo�(ep e —� to slooUDS (OMIT. "r (9-ol) 4laldosl WA z WN I w 005 0 (S-O[) —J I spoiluao 0E'Zbb — {l slomi snsuao (IN3931 .01 - e am S_ol n• != II � n... j I •' _ r. MVdWl dO 3NOZ 4 .ON 1NVld vo,,,img eum°°°°o A,auo6,uoyy�y+ spuq —77 i i 01 `� • I � 5- / ai I ,• � n.uwe I II \ JJ5 I I 7�1 7i . p y. a I ajeoAea I— io siao4os RU` WN 2 WN i 'W oos J (s-OL) 4laldosl . — — — — (s-ol.) 4laldosl L f - splojluao 0E'266 r sioel1 snsuep C . CIN3J3l r I 1�� py 01 I /ax 01 J 5- I s01 �- I., ' C I � I _ L- C _ r� 638 . 07 J ' 638 .—��� 638 . 08 �639. 06 ' \` � 2. 01 636 . 01 z 63�,` � ` ---��- -�'� ,� 632. 02 'I 631 . 03 .6.36 ; 02 -5 �Cto ; . 03 — i 634 Y.IBs M.MYIIQO.Y1y PLANT NO2 ZONE OF IMPACT ...u..c r FIGURE 5.1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIfDRNIA 1CB40 ELLIS AVENUE v0 90x 9121 FWNFAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92]29412] 71AI992.2A11 Match 18, 1993 STAFF REPORT Biofiltration Demonstration Project OVERVIEW Last November, the Boards authorized staff to conduct a Biofiltration Demonstration Project to study the feasibility of biofiltration to remove toxic, volatile organic, and odorous air emissions from our treatment plants. The estimated cost of the demonstration project is $280,000. In November, staff had communicated to the Directors that other parties may be interested in co-funding this research project, including the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) . Approval was given to enter into grant contracts with both SCAQMD ($124,568) and WERF ($30,000) , along with authorization to contract with others that will be working with the Districts on this project. Subsequently, Southern California Edison (SCE) has also expressed an interest in providing some funding. However, staff did not then have firm commitments from any of the potential funding participants. Because of that, staff also indicated that they would report back to the Directors after receiving notice from WERF and SCAQMD prior to proceeding with the project, and that authorization would be requested to enter into a grant agreement with SCE if SCE decided to provide some funding to this project. The purpose of this staff report is to update the Directors on the status of grant negotiations with SCAQMD, WERF, and SCE; to request authorization to proceed with the research; and to request authorization to execute a specific term employment agreement with Shabbir Basrai to assist the Air Quality Division in accomplishing the research efforts. Staff Report: Biofiltration Demonstration Project March 18, 1993 Page 2 of 5 SCOPE OF RESEARCH The research work consists of five tasks, as follows: 1. Task I - Review of literature on biofiltration. 2 . Task II - Development of experimental protocols. 3 . Task III - Testing of bench scale biofilters. 4 . Task IV - Testing of pilot scale biofilters. 5. Task V - Conceptual design of full-scale biofilter. STATUS OF FUNDING PARTICIPANTS The SCAQMD Board of Directors formally approved funding participation in our research project at their December Board meeting in the amount of $125, 000. Discussions with SCAQMD staff indicate that we should have a contract in place by the first week in April. WERF's research council formally approved our research project in the amount of $30,000, at their November meeting. Conversations with WERF staff indicate that we should have a contract in place by April 15, 1993 . Districts' staff have met with SCE staff several times to work out the terms of a contractual agreement. SCE expects to contract with the Districts by mid-April in an amount of $50,000. To date, however, no contracts have been signed with any of the funding participants due to their internal delays in processing contracts and our ongoing attempts to finalize contract language. The current proposal for the demonstration project funding is compared below with November's proposal: DEMONSTRATION PROJECT FUNDING CURRENT NOVEMBER SOURCE PROPOSAL PROPOSAL SCAQMD $125, 000 $124, 568 WERF 30, 000 30,000 SCE 50, 000 -0- Sanitation Districts 75.000 125.432 TOTAL $280,000 $280,000 Staff Report: Biofiltration Demonstration Project March 18, 1993 + Page 3 of 5 RECOMMENDATION TO PROCEED WITH PROJECT Although the grant agreements have not yet been finalized, we do have verbal commitments. Staff, therefore, recommends that the Biofiltration Demonstration Project proceed pending the finalization of the research grants for the following reasons: 1. The 1990 Federal Clean Air Act, requires that EPA develop air toxic control performance criteria for municipal wastewater treatment plants by 1995. The Districts, along with a small handful of other wastewater agencies, are moving forward with original research to have a factual basis for establishing performance criteria, because it is better to have the facts at hand when we deal with EPA on these cutting edge issues in order to best make our case for rational standards. If we do not begin the project soon, we will not have the information we seek in time to effectively use it in arguing our position with the regulators. 2. SCAQMD, WERF, and SCE have all committed through either resolution by their governing Board, or other action to co- fund the project. 3 . The inherent bureaucratic procedures of the three co-funding participants has resulted in delays in establishing the project contracts (our original anticipated contract start date was January 1, 1993) . Further delays are possible, with each of the three parties funding the project at different times. Implementation of the project could be delayed further if we wait for all parties to reach agreement. 4. Research grant money from WERF and SCAQMD are on a calendar year cycle. Further delays in implementing this research could adversely impact our ability to obtain follow-up research funding, since we would not have collected enough data to develop a follow-up research proposal (full scale demonstration of biofiltration) within the prescribed funding cycle. 5. Several key workshops on biofiltration are planned for April, May, and June of 1993. It is important that staff attend these meetings which will be funded by the research funds. r Staff Report: Biofiltration Demonstration Project March 18, 1993 Page 4 of 5 .r 6. Last, but certainly not least, the potential capital and operational savings to the Districts for air quality control measures by influencing regulatory standard-setting based on the successful outcome of research, such as this, are very substantial; thus, justifying the research work regardless of whether outside funding participation is available. REQUEST TO HIRE SPECIFIC TERM EMPLOYEE When the proposed biofiltration project was first presented to the Directors for consideration, staff estimated that 1,100 manhours would be required to accomplish the work. Staff felt that the work could be accomplished concurrently with their other air quality management responsibilities using existing staff resources. However, two factors have arisen that may prevent staff from meeting its obligations under the research grant with existing personnel. The first is the level of data collection, Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) , and reporting expected by the co-funding participants exceeds that which was originally anticipated by the Districts. We now estimate the labor hours required to accomplish the project to be around 1,500 hours (an increase of 36 percent) . Secondly, since our November report to �..i the Directors, several new rules have either been adopted or are being proposed by SCAQMD and the California Air Resources Board that require Districts' staff to commit significant resources to track, review, analyze, and work with SCAQMD and other POTWs during rule implementation and/or development. For these reasons, staff recommends that a specific-term contract engineer be engaged to provide assistance to the Air Quality Division for the research project. Upon completion of the research, the person would be terminated. The specific-term-contract engineer will work full time and exclusively on the biofiltration project. Duties will include collecting data, overseeing QA/QC, developing technical reports and budget reports for the funding agencies, searching library databases for literature and retrieving information, providing technical input into the development of experiments, administering subcontracts and contracts with the funding participants, overseeing the testing programs for the biofilters, and coordinating meetings with research participants. Districts' staff has sought qualified candidates. The most qualified candidate that staff interviewed is Shabbir S. Basrai. Mr. Basrai is a chemical engineer who has been working in the air pollution field for the past five years. His experience with managing large air quality related projects, coupled with his Staff Report: Biofiltration Demonstration Project March 18, 1993 -+ Page 5 of 5 educational background in microbiology, qualify him for the position and will minimize any "learning curve" he would otherwise have to undergo to work effectively in this capacity. Other candidates did not posses these qualifications. Staff, therefore, recommends approval of a specific-term- employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for a 12 month period, at an hourly rate of $21.63 per hour, for a total amount not to exceed $45,000. Because the person would not be eligible for typical employee benefits under the terms of the specific- term-employment agreement, the added manhours required can be absorbed by the original budget amount of $280,000. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS Amend authorization of November 18, 1993, authorizing staff to conduct Biofiltration Demonstration Project to add the following: 1. Authorize the General Manager to execute a grant .�. agreement with the Southern California Edison Company for partial funding of the Biofiltration Project in the amount of $50,000. 2. Authorize the General Manager to execute a specific- term-employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services for up to a twelve (12) month period, at a hourly rate for total compensation of $21.63 per hour, for a maximum amount not to exceed $45,000. Staff also recommends that the Directors authorize the Biofiltration Demonstration to immediately proceed pending execution of the grand funding participation agreements. EMT:dk Ref#340037 .rp e COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA - RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 'OBAAKLIS."EN°E PC BOX 8127 FW WAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92729-8127 March 18, 1993 711I962-2411 REPORT OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE Meeting Date: March 18. 1993 -- 5:30 p.m. COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: James A. Wahner, Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Fred Barrera Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Bob Bell Engineering John Collins Roger Carrillo, Staff Architect Jan Debay James H. Flora Don R. Griffin Gail Kerry Thomas E. Lutz Eva Miner �../ Carrey Nelson Sheldon S. Singer Charles Sylvia George L. Zlaket Absent: Barry Hammond Miguel Pulido Jim Silva 1. Review of the Buildina Committee's Resoonsibilities and Recent Activities. For the benefit of new Committee Members the General Manager summarized the committee responsibilities and recent activities. The Building Committee was formed by the Boards of Directors to provide guidance and direction for planning and construction of nontreatment plant facilities. These generally include office buildings, shops, warehouses, laboratories, security and landscaping. The Districts attempt to locate these facilities on the plant perimeter and give special attention to architectural treatment so that they help screen the �..i treatment facilities and provide a pleasant structure, as well as landscaping, that Report of the Building Committee March 18, 1993 Page Two blends into the surrounding community. The General Manager also summarized the major elements of the Districts 30-Year Wastewater Management Action Plan, "2020 Vision" for the Directors. In recent years, the Committee has overseen the remodeling and enlargement of the administrative facilities, the new Control Center at Plant No. 1, and our new Central Laboratory at Plant No. 1, as well as some eight separate shop additions. Also, at Plant No. 2 a contract has recently been awarded for the enlargement of that Operations Center and work is expected to start soon. At the March Board Meeting, the Directors accepted as complete the new Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building across from our new Central Laboratory at Plant No. 1. Yet to be completed are four other associated contracts that will provide the necessary interior furnishings and computer equipment. All of those contracts, including the installation of our new central computer system, the telemetry system for our outlying pumping stations, and installation of interior partitioning and furniture have been awarded and are expected to be completed soon. 2. Proposed Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Specification No. M-044. For many years the Districts have utilized office trailers for temporary quarters until permanent office space could be built; or for activities that are considered somewhat transient in nature, such as the construction management offices. We periodically relocate our construction management offices to an area that is close to the major upcoming construction work. This project is the relocation of thirteen existing office trailers located at both treatment plants to new uses. Several of the trailers are located adjacent to the old laboratory and are proposed to be relocated to new uses at both Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2. Source Control inspectors are moving into recently completed facilities near our shop, and two trailers previously used by that group located in the south central portion of the plant are proposed to be relocated to Plant No. 2. Finally, our construction trailers at Plant No. 2 are proposed to be relocated to other uses to clear the way for the construction of our new Maintenance Building and Warehouse. -2- Report of the Building Committee March 18, 1993 �--..E Page Three At the meeting, staff provided plans to show the intended new uses. At Plant No. 2 about half of the trailers will be used to upgrade and relocate the Construction Management office at Plant No. 2. The existing Plant No. 2 Construction Management office is housed in trailers, most of which are sixteen years old and in need of repair. Staff is proposing that all of the trailers be reused within the plant interior, some for storage of materials. The estimated cost for the trailer relocation, utility hookups, and paving at the new sites for the trailers is $150,000.00. Recommendation The Committee recommends approval of the plans and specifications for Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for said project. 3. Status Report on Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Construction �./ of Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-2. and Warehouse Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-3. The Committee has previously approved the location, architectural treatment, and size for these new facilities. The Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2 is a 29,750 square foot facility located just south of the main entrance, adjacent to Brookhurst Street. The Warehouse facility, at 29,600 square feet, is located on the southwesterly corner of the plant boundary near Brookhurst Street. The estimated cost of the Maintenance Building is $3,500,000 and the Warehouse Building is $4,000,000. Staff reported that the plans are approximately 80 percent complete and that they would be ready for submittal to the City of Huntington Beach for plan checking in about four months. 4. Status Report on Additional Building Committee Projects. A. Reclamation Plant No. 1. Personnel Office: The Districts Personnel Office is currently housed in trailers until a new Personnel Building is designed and built. Brown and Caldwell, as part of a larger professional services contract awarded a few years ago for the design of several support facilities, began preliminary work -3- Report of the Building Committee - March 18, 1993 Page Four on the building. Last year work was suspended as part of an addendum to the Brown and Caldwell contract. New layouts are being prepared by staff for consideration and approval prior to commencing final design. Demolition of Old Laboratory for Administration Office Annex: Staff reported that plans and specifications for the demolition of the old laboratory are about 50 percent complete. This site will be used in the future for the Administration Building annex to house the Technical Services Divisions which are not in the new laboratory, and the Management Information Services Division. The long-term plan calls for moving most of the Technical Services Department into the new building, estimated at about 18,000 square feet. B. Treatment Plant No. 2. Security and Landscaping Requirements: A contract is in preparation for additional landscaping and security improvements. It is expected that these plans will be ready for Committee review next fall. Demolition of Old Structures (Temporary Warehouse): Plans for demolishing old structures, once the new Warehouse and Maintenance Buildings are complete, should be ready in the Fall. 5. Status of Claim re Professional Services for Design of Administration Building Addition. Job No. J-7-4. The Committee previously directed Counsel to file claims against the architect who prepared the plans and specifications for the Administration Building Addition. Subsequently, a lawsuit was filed against the architect, Pulaski and Arita Architects. Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering, updated the members on the status of the lawsuit. TMD:jt wpAeden9leener4ne\W 199].hcr -4- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS RE: AGENDA ITEM N0, 13 FI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA JOE44 EUUS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA M728-8127 `y all)S82-NIII March 25, 1993 REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION. RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: MARCH 25, 1993 - 5:30 PM COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Pr n : John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager John J. Collins Charles Egigian Nichols, Conservation, Recycle Burnie Dunlap and Reuse Manager James M. Ferryman Susan M. Bradford, Principal Environmental Specialist Frank Laszlo Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations Victor Leipzig Ted R. Moreno Carrey J. Nelson Iry Pickier Phil Sansone Sal Sapien Absen : Maria Moreno Glenn Parker Leslie A. Pontious Robert Richardson Peer Swan Henry W. Wedaa 1) DISTRICTS' ON-SITE RECYCLED WATER NEEDS Reclaimed Water Pricing Staff reported that pursuant to a 1972 agreement, the Districts have been providing the Orange County Water District (OCWD) with treated secondary effluent at no cost for use in their water recycling programs. The Districts' 1989 Master Plan �EFi Report of the Conservation, , Recycle and Reuse Committee March 25, 1993 *.W identified the demand for recycled water for operational needs at Plants No. 1 and No. 2 to meet a portion of our treatment plant operating water use requirements. Staff reported on the most cost-effective manner to meet the Districts' recycled water needs using the enclosed staff report (lavender) and enclosed discussion outline (white). Use of recycled (tertiary) water for certain treatment plant processes is less costly than potable water, will replace treatment plant (secondary) water, will ensure maximum safety for the Districts' employees, and will help conserve water resources. Staff summarized the Districts' Master Plan where it was assumed that recycled water would be supplied by the OCWD Green Acres Project (GAP) at minimal cost and the Districts would in turn supply the OCWD with secondary effluent for recycling purposes. In December 1991, the Districts began receiving approximately 1.4 million gallons per day (mgd) of GAP water from the OCWD. The Districts' recycled water needs are expected to increase with expansion of Plant No. 1 and delivery of recycled water to Plant No. 2. The Districts have been receiving GAP water pending a new contract with the OCWD to define the terms and conditions of its acquisition. For the reasons stated above, the 1972 agreement needs updating and the Directors have previously given staff the following directives towards that end: - Negotiate an agreement with the OCWD to provide secondary treated effluent at no cost, provided that the price for GAP water to the Districts not exceed the OCWD's best pricing to other customers. - Include language in any agreement that acknowledges the changing nature of water pricing and provides for modifications to the agreement to reflect such changes and the change in cost and policy of providing secondary treated effluent to the OCWD. - Evaluate the option and cost of producing recycled water with on-site Districts' facilities as an alternative to acquiring GAP water. The Districts engaged a consultant to prepare a feasibility study for producing recycled water on-site that would meet Department of Health Services standards, using small, modular treatment plants and ultraviolet (UV) light disinfection. The present worth cost for the on-site facilities is estimated at $7.6 million. -2- ' Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee `-� March 25, 1993 The staff from both districts have negotiated a preliminary agreement on the price of GAP water, wherein the Districts would only pay the audited O&M costs for the amount of GAP water used by the Districts. Current O&M costs are approximately $460.50 per million gallons ($150 per acre foot). Based upon the current OCWD price proposal, the present worth cost for GAP water was estimated at $4.7 million in comparison to $7.6 million for on-site facilities. The terms of the contract negotiated with the OCWD for long-term supply of GAP water also include a provision that the Districts would pay the audited O&M costs, or the lowest price paid for GAP water by any other GAP customer, whichever is less. In turn, the Districts will continue to provide the OCWD with treated secondary water at no cost, provided that the issue of secondary water valuation and pricing can be revisited at any time. Should the OCWD be unable to provide the Districts with GAP water due to increased community demand for recycled water, then the OCWD will give the Districts 24 months in which to complete on-site water recycling facilities. The Committee reviewed in detail the assumptions used to complete the economic analysis. It was noted that the analysis used a 4% inflation rate and that for �..i the equal comparison of projects, the salvage value equalled zero after 20 years. If the Districts were to complete its own on-site modular water recycling facility, it would not be used to supply recycled water to customers off-site. UV Light Disinfection Pilot Proigct Both the Orange County Water District and the Sanitation Districts are interested in maximizing the use of recycled water. To best achieve that goal, the chlorine residual now present in GAP water needs to be reduced. Chlorine is currently used for disinfecting GAP water. Staff from both districts are, therefore, recommending that a joint pilot plant test be conducted to determine the feasibility of UV light disinfection in lieu of chlorination for water and wastewater treatment processes. Staff reviewed the information in the enclosed staff report (lavender) and the Committee discussed UV disinfection pilot testing including successful demonstrations at other facilities. Staff described that UV pilot testing is still a sufficiently new and evolving technology that pilot testing is required to match the UV system to the Districts unique secondary clarifier flow characteristics. -3- Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee March 25, 1993 RECOMMENDATIONS The Committee recommends the following actions: A) Authorize staff to complete negotiations for an agreement with the OCWD in a form approved by the General Counsel that would: 1) provide up to 50 mgd of secondary effluent to the OCWD for recycling purposes at no charge, with a provision to, at any time, reevaluate the valuation and pricing for secondary effluent; and 2) provide for purchase of GAP water for 20 years at the audited cost to operate and maintain the GAP facility. (The current O&M cost is $460.50 per mg or $150 per AF). The contract would provide that the Districts' cost would not exceed the O&M cost or the lowest cast of any GAP customer, whichever is less. B) Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with the OCWD for pilot plant testing of UV light disinfection technology, with estimated $160,000 cost to be shared equally in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the Districts' share of out-of-pocket costs for outside consulting services, and $40,000 for the Districts' laboratory services. 2) UPDATE ON SITING FOR A WATER RECYCLING FACILITY The 1989 Master Plan emphasizes the importance of water recycling to conserve water resources. The 30-year Master Plan provides for construction and operation of up to three new upstream wastewater recycling plants. Staff reviewed the enclosed staff report (blue) providing a status update on continuing efforts to acquire sites for water recycling plants. The Committee discussed the status of activities on several sites including the Waste Water Disposal Company site in Fullerton at State College Boulevard and Orangethorpe, the Ball-Harbor site being surplused by Orange County General Services Administration, the La Palma site near SR 57 and SR 91 in Anaheim, the Crescent Basin site near I-5 and Brookhurst Avenue in Anaheim, and the State College Boulevard-Winston Road site in Anaheim. The Committee emphasized their support for continuing with water recycling site acquisition, noting that land values are favorable for immediate purchase. In the discussion that followed on project cost-effectiveness, staff emphasized that water recycling facilities are costly, that water pricing is dynamic, and that historically water pricing has been subsidized not market-based. Currently, the cost-effectiveness of water -4- \./ Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee March 25, 1993 recycling is marginal. California is finally starting to move towards market-based water pricing and eventually the cost curves will cross, but the Districts need to proceed cautiously by obtaining guaranteed markets for recycled water prior to a major facility undertaking. 3) OTHER BUSINESS The Committee considered an invitation by Director Wedaa to visit the headquarters of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for an upcoming meeting. The meeting could provide the opportunity to inspect the SCAQMD's laboratory and fuel cell facilities and discuss air quality management matters. Staff was directed to determine alternative dates and times with SCAQMD for such a meeting and poll the Committee on their availability. CEN:gc Attachments Ref#330134.rp -5- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS i W ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA March 18, 1993 119 ELUS AVENJE " W.8'2] FWNLIN VLLLEV,CALIF0"IA 92720-8121 ..� n+u W2.241 1 STAFF REPORT STATUS OF ANAHEIM FOREBAY WATER RECYCLING PLANT SITING 1) BACKGROUND The Districts' 1989 Master Plan identifies increased water recycling as one of the Districts' major programmatic goals. Several goals were adopted including construction and operation of up to three new upstream water recycling plants. The Master Plan assumes that these would be accomplished partly with the Orange County Water District. Accordingly, there are numerous ongoing efforts pertaining to the Districts acquisition of land in the Anaheim Forebay area. A minimum five acres is required for up to a 10 million-gallon-per-day (mgd) facility. If a site can be acquired in the near future, and allowing for permitting, design and construction of the facility of seven to ten years, recycled water could be provided by the year 2000. The location of the sites under consideration are shown in the attached Figure 1. The status of the six potential sites �./ considered to date is given below. 2) WASTE WATER DISPOSAL COMPANY SITE The Waste Water Disposal Company (WWDC) site, located near State College Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue, is a 5.74 acre parcel located in Fullerton. Staff has negotiated intermittently for the past two years with W WDC to determine the purchase terms and conditions. Prior to reaching any agreement on the property, an environmental assessment is required to determine if any soil contamination is present from the oil waste operations that have occurred at this site for the past 60 years. As authorized by the Boards a letter agreement prepared by counsel has been executed by WWDC and the Districts reaffirming the Districts interest in this property and the terms under which WWDC would conduct and pay for an environmental site assessment. The agreement does not commit the Districts to purchase of the property or any liability if the property is determined to be contaminated. The site environmental assessment should be completed in two to three months. The Districts' staff will be able to interact with the consultant during the assessment process. Results of the environmental assessment will provide the Districts with information necessary to determine the feasibility of this site for acquisition. t Staff Report Status of Water Recycling Site Acquisition March 18, 1993 3) BALL/HARBOR SITE The Orange County General Services Agency (GSA) has a surplus parcel of 11.68 acres near the intersection of Ball Road and Harbor Boulevard in Anaheim (see attached Figure 2). The Agricultural Commissioner's Sealer of Weights and Measures buildings are located on a portion of this property. Approximately half of the parcel is undeveloped and has been historically used for agricultural purposes. The GSA is currently having the property appraised and will provide this information to the Districts when available in the next two to three months. Staff has completed a preliminary feasibility evaluation of the site. In an overview sense, staff has determined that the property is feasible for a water recycling facility of the size and scope desired by the Districts. The property was evaluated using the characteristics developed for the past site studies including the nature of the site, the water reuse market in the vicinity of the site, the socio- environmental factors and costs. The surrounding area is a blend of commercial and residential property. The State College trunkline is approximately 1.5 miles from this site and would be the source of wastewater for the water recycling facility. The Harbor/Ball site is within a four-mile radius to approximately 37 potential recycled water users. Identified potential users include parks, school yards, freeway greenscape, and some industries. This location is also close to potential recycled water users such as the Disneyland, and Anaheim's commercial/recreational areas, which includes the sports complex and stadium. Anaheim also has a proposed "Garden District" landscape plan for certain streets. In the past, the City of Anaheim has shown interest in siting of a reclamation plant in Anaheim and the new City Hall building has been plumbed to receive recycled water. The GSA property near Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road is located in an area containing residential and commercial zoning. This site is closer to residential properties than the other sites under consideration. There has been no contact with the public regarding this site; however, staff is developing a public information and survey program to determine the level of public acceptance for the proposed water recycling facility siting. Environmental considerations include assessment of past agricultural practices and their potential impact on the subsurface and groundwater. The GSA desires to lease the property. Terms for a lease option are currently being explored by the Districts and GSA. A draft lease has been provided by GSA to the Districts' staff to determine the feasibility of a long-term lease and staff is currently reviewing the lease with legal counsel. -2- Staff Report Status of Water Recycling Site Acquisition f March 18, 1993 Staff has had several meetings with GSA to determine the feasibility of siting a water recycling plant at this location. GSA's staff has been highly motivated in helping the Districts' staff determine the feasibility of siting a reclamation plant on this parcel. Additional meetings with GSA are planned to continue site evaluation. Staff has recently met with City of Anaheim to determine the city's level of support for siting of a water recycling facility at this location. Staff from the city's planning department is reviewing current and future land use in the area surrounding the Harbor/Ball site to help determine feasibility of this parcel for a water recycling facility. 4) DISNEYLAND SITE The Districts' staff has met with Disney Development Company (DDC) officials several times in the past year to discuss the potential for delivery of recycled water to the proposed theme park expansion. The Disneyland draft environmental impact report identifies many potential uses for recycled water in their proposed theme park expansion. Also discussed was the possibility of siting a water recycling facility on Disneyland's property. No decision has been made yet by DDC concerning the potential siting of a water recycling facility on Disney property. Staff will continue to monitor this with DDC on a monthly basis for an update on their recycled water needs for the theme park expansion. 5) LA PALMA SITE Located near the intersection of State Route 57 and State Route 91 is the 15 acre La Palma site in Anaheim. It is presently used for strawberry fields. In addition, there are two oil wells on the site. High concentrations of total dissolved solids (TDS) in the wastewater tributary to this site could require additional desalting of the recycled water and increase the cost to produce recycled water. Additional monitoring of the TDS levels in the adjacent Carbon Canyon Interceptor has been planned for March - April, 1993 to verify the wastewater quality. 6) CRESCENT BASIN SITE The Crescent Basin site is a 10-acre parcel located near the Interstate 5 Freeway and Brookhurst Avenue in Anaheim. This site is used for flood control purposes. The County Environmental Management Agency (EMA) staff has reaffirmed the need to retain flood control capacity down stream of this site, should it be used for a water recycling facility. Costs for flood control channel improvements would be $6 to S7 million in addition to fair market value cost for the land. For these reasons and the fact that this site is located to the west of most potential recycled water users, the Crescent -3- Staff Report Status of Water Recycling Site Acquisition March 18, 1993 Basin site is not a preferred site. Staff is requesting a letter from the EMA setting forth their position on requiring the additional flood control improvements, should the property be used for a water recycling facility. 7) ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION SITE Staff met several times last year with representatives of Rockwell to determine the feasibility of acquiring a five-to-ten acre parcel as Rockwell plans to downsize their Anaheim operations complex. Rockwell officials have decided to retain the 200-acre parcel; therefore, this location is no longer an option. 8) STATE COLLEGE/WINSTON ROAD SITE A parcel at the corner of State College Boulevard and Winston Road in Anaheim (Figure 3) is currently being investigated by staff. The property is zoned for light industry and was originally to be used for an industrial development. Environmental site assessment efforts for subsurface contamination are apparent. The surrounding area is commercial/industrial and staff will continue to research this site and assess its feasibility for a water recycling facility. 9) REVIEW OF OTHER AVAILABLE PROPERTY The availability of other properties in the Anaheim Forebay area is being monitored to be able to make a complete evaluation of potential water recycling facility sites. Consulting services for approximately $5,000 are being considered to help report the availability five-to-ten acre parcels on a monthly basis. The consultant will provide information on the price, motivation of the seller, land use, zoning, and proximity to industrial as well as residential areas. This information will help staff keep updated on potential 'hew' sites. SMB:ahh REF #330112.RP 4 �i Staff Report Status of Water Recycling Site Acquisition March 18, 1993 FIGURE 1. Potential Sites for an Upstream Water Recycling Facility in North Orange County Waste Water Disposal Company Crescent Basin F1, W ULLIR TOH4 CFM 7BLL2W4 0 ,,,� PHriY� NEI8i La Palma Dm6LRW T0W � ^� u.s.� �6 W0WT0® N. gu�ur� Pam AW0 ECI dRE ..a0� I • A. �. �. Staff Report Status of Water Recycling Site Acquisition ` - March 18, 1993 �•r FIGURE 2. GSA Surplus Property Near Harbor and Ball in Anaheim ! VERMO.VT AVE. Y � couvey OF ORA,VGE HARBOR / Lu 6L VO, _-- COMPLEX :AUAPAT/OA/TAUKO Ir NE/G11/N6 2W CHUB?AT/ON 4. -6- Staff Report Status of Water Recycling Site Acquisition March 18, 1993 v FIGURE 3. State College Boulevard/Winston Road Site ' s � �: �a :.•..M y4 'x 4 ws Ex � ..`55R s, SYG •.. EW. s - . i b py'` °'. + .�I:i 'Sd '^°�4 b NOY M� VV S�iY e .. m � 4 • � wcwa,�r�` "�� 1 "• � _ .. € I 3 SITE �w -7- e THE DISTRICTS' NEED FOR ON-SITE RECYCLED WATER USE • ENSURE MAXIMUM EMPLOYEE SAFETY • LESS COSTLY THAN POTABLE WATER • WILL REPLACE SOME TREATMENT PLANT (SECONDARY) WATER • WILL HELP CONSERVE WATER RESOURCES TABLE I SUMMARY OF PLANT NO. 1 WATER USES Potable Recycled Plant Water Water Water Domestic Uses Blower Building Primary Clarifiers Boiler Water Headworks Washdown Evaporators* Scrubbers Secondary Clarifiers Eye Wash Plant Irrigation Washdown Stations Chemical Mixing Digester Gas Handling Hot Water Loop General Cooling Admin. Irrigation Washdown Chlorination Central Central Generation* Generation* Belt Press Wash Headworks Washdown Blower Building Cooling *Under Construction TABLE 2 WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS FROM 1992 THROUGH 2O10 WATER USES (mgd) 1992 2010 PLANT 1 Ave. Peak Ave. Peak Potable Water .11 1.47 .21 3.16 Recycled Water .97 1.76 2.68 4.81 Plant Water 5.24 6.32 7.61 9.96 u PLANT 2 Ave. Peak Ave. Peak Potable Water .25 1.73 .22 1.48 Recycled Water .72' .72' .72 .72 Plant Water 7.78 9.07 6.67 7.78 * Not Presently Available DISTRICTS' OPTIONS FOR A RECYCLED WATER SUPPLY 1) GREEN ACRES PROJECT RECEIVE RECYCLED WATER FROM THE OCWD VIA EXISTING PIPELINE 2) INSTALLATION OF ON-SITE WATER RECYCLING FACILITIES DISTRICTS' OPTIONS FOR A RECYCLED WATER SUPPLY 2) INSTALLATION OF ON-SITE WATER RECYCLING FACILITIES Ultraviolet Disinfection Alternative Polymer Alum Secondary Effluent :TT Granular Rapid Flocculation Media Mix Filtration Reclaimed Wastewater UV Disinfection PRESENT-WORTH COSTS Green Acres Project On-Site Water Recycling $ 4.7 million $ 7.6 million Green Acres Project Water Districts pay Operations & Maintenance costs for the amount of Green Acres Project water used. ($460.50 per million gallons) ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT DISINFECTION PILOT PLANT Determine specific criteria (UV dose and operational parameters) required to maintain reliability of UV disinfection treatment. Identify and define parameters that affect UV disinfection efficiency when using the Districts' secondary effluent. --u RECOMMENDATIONS A) Authorize staff to complete negotiations for an agreement with the OCWD in a form approved by the General Counsel that would: 1) Provide up to 50 mgd of secondary effluent to the OCWD for recycling purposes at no charge, with a provision to, at any time, reevaluate the valuation and pricing for secondary effluent. 2) Provide for purchase of GAP water for 20 years at the audited cost to operate and maintain the GAP facility. (The current O&M cost is $460.50 per mg or $150 per AF.) The contract would provide that the Districts' cost would not exceed the O&M cost or the lowest cost of any GAP customer, whichever is less. 9' RECOMMENDATIONS B) Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with the OCWD for pilot plant testing of UV light disinfection technology, costs to be shared equally in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the Districts' share of out-of-pocket costs for outside consulting services. (Estimated total cost to the Districts, including in- house laboratory services, is $80,000.) 1� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 0 01 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA March 18, 1993 IOM< AVENUE a0.E0.E+n ' MWMN V"UY.CgtlfU B2]28Al2) 9141es2A 11 STAFF REPORT SUPPLY OF RECYCr ED WATER FOR DISTRICTS' TREATMENT PLANT 1) BACKGROUND The Districts' 1989 Master Plan identified the desirability of using recycled water at Plants No. 1 and No. 2 to meet a portion of our plant operating water requirements. Use of recycled (tertiary) water for certain treatment plant processes is less costly than potable water, will replace treatment plant (secondary) water, will ensure maximum safety for the Districts' employees, and will help conserve water resources. In the Master Plan, it was assumed that this water would be supplied by the Orange County Water District (OCWD) at a minimal cost and the Districts would, in turn, continue to supply the OCWD with secondary effluent for recycling purposes. In 1991, the Districts began receiving Green Acres Project (GAP) recycled water from the OCWD at an average rate of approximately 1.4 million gallons per day (mgd) at Plant No. 1. Plans are underway to provide recycled water to Plant No. 2. The Districts have �✓ been receiving GAP water pending negotiation of a contract with the OCWD to define the terms and conditions of its acquisition. The Districts have a long-standing policy of making their treated secondary effluent available for water recycling. Pursuant to a 1972 agreement, the Districts have provided the OCWD with up to 15 mgd of secondary effluent free of charge over the past 20 years for use in Water Factory 21 and since 1991 for GAP. As the OCWD's needs for secondary effluent increase (they estimate an eventual demand of up to 50 mgd) the Districts must treat additional effluent to the secondary level to meet both our NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit requirements and the OCWD's needs. The recommended agreement with the OCWD will reiterate the Districts' support for water recycling and the Boards' current policy of supplying its effluent at no cost to the OCWD. The agreement will also provide language that will allow for review of the value and cost of our secondary effluent at any time. 2) DISTRICTS' TREATMENT PLANT RECYCLED WATER NEEDS The Districts' 1989 Master Plan identified the use of three different water supplies at Plants No. 1 and No. 2 in order to meet various treatment plant water needs, ensure maximum safety, and still conserve potable water supplies. Table 1 summarizes that information. r s s Staff Report Supply of Recycled Water March 18, 1993 TABLE 1 SUMMARY OF PLANT NO. 1 WATER USES Potable Recycled Plant Water Water Water Domestic Uses Blower Building Primary Clarifiers Washdown Boiler Water Headworks Secondary Clarifiers Washdown Evaporators' Scrubbers Digester Gas Handling Cooling Eye Wash Stations Plant Irrigation Chlorination Hot Water Loop Chemical Mixing Central Generation' Admin. Irrigation General Washdown Belt Press Wash Central Generation' Headworks Washdown Blower Building Cooling n er onstrucnon At Plant No. 1, all three water supplies are used including potable water supplied through the City of Fountain Valley, recycled GAP water currently supplied by the OCWD, and plant water (disinfected secondary effluent). Table 2 summarizes current and projected water use at Plants No. 1 and No. 2, respectively. TABLE 2 WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS FROM 1992 THROUGH 2O10 WATER USES (mgd) 1992 2010 PLANT 1 Average Peak Average Peak Potable Water 11 1.47 .21 3.16 Recycled Water 97 1.76 2.68 4.81 Plant Water 5.24 6.32 7.61 9.96 PLANT 2 Average Peak Average Peak Potable Water .25 1.73 .22 1.48 Recycled Water .72' .72' 72 .72 Plant Water 7.78 9.07 6.67 7.78 Not Presently Available -2- ` a 3 Staff Report Supply of Recycled Water March 18, 1993 Due to the higher cost of potable water and our interest in conserving water supplies, the Districts have implemented measures to reduce water use. Total water use has been significantly reduced. In addition, as GAP becomes available in appropriate quantities, it can be used and replace the use of water from other sources. Potable water is only used for employee needs and for treatment processes requiring a very high quality water. This has allowed the Districts to shift some of its treatment processes to recycled water that meets strict California Department of Health Services (DHS) standards. This action is consistent with state law that declares it is unreasonable and a waste to use potable water in circumstances where recycled water is available, meets water quality needs, and is economically feasible. The Districts' water demands continue to increase as construction of new facilities is completed. This is especially true at Plant No. 1 as wastewater flows are expected to increase over the next 20 years from 55 mgd to 150 mgd. Staff continues to identify the most suitable water supply for each treatment process based on maintaining maximum employee safety, while keeping in mind the water quality needed for each job and the cost effectiveness of each type of water utilized. 3) OPTIONS FOR RECYCLED WATER SUPPLY �✓ The Districts and the OCWD first formalized their working relationship in 1972 with an agreement that provided the OCWD with up to 15 mgd of secondary treated effluent for water recycling purposes at no cost. The 30-year agreement also defined the terms for the Districts to receive desalting brines from the OCWD. Revisions to the 1972 agreement are needed to reflect changes that have occurred or that are anticipated in the future, including the Districts' cost for GAP water. Last year, the Districts' Master Plan water recycling goals were reviewed with the Directors and the Boards who reiterated support for water recycling. Staff was also authorized to negotiate a new agreement with the OCWD to: 1) continue providing secondary treated effluent to the OCWD at no cost, but with provisions to reopen the issue of valuation of secondary effluent; and 2) purchase GAP water at a price no greater than any other GAP water customer. The Directors and the Boards also directed staff to evaluate the option of the Districts constructing and operating their own on-site water recycling facilities as an alternative to purchasing GAP water. Over the past two years, staff from both districts have been discussing appropriate revisions to the 1972 agreement. A range of alternatives for GAP water pricing have been explored including the Districts buying a percentage of the GAP facility and "owning" a reserved capacity of GAP water; the feasibility of the Districts producing their �./ -3- Staff Report Supply of Recycled Water March 18, 1993 own recycled water using small, on-site modular treatment plant additions; and the pricing options on continuing to receive GAP water from the OCWD at some agreed to cost based on different assumptions. The Districts also have the option of increasing use of potable water to meet their needs; however, this is not in keeping with the Districts' commitment to water recycling and conservation measures, nor is it cost effective. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California projections for increased water costs are significant. By the year 2000, potable water is expected to increase from $988 per-million-gallons (mg) to $2,084 per mg [or $679 per acre foot (AF)I. It would cost the Districts over $1.9 million for 912 mg (or 2,800 AF) of potable water for that year versus $420,000 for an equivalent amount of GAP water. (A) Option 1 - GAP Recycled Water The Districts have the option to continue receiving GAP water. Staff from both districts have negotiated and reached preliminary agreement on terms for the Districts' purchase of GAP water from the OCWD. The cost of GAP water to the Districts for the 20-year term would be the operations and maintenance (O&M) costs that the OCWD incurs to produce this water. This cost is and would continue to be the lowest price paid by any GAP water retailer. The current O&M cost is $460.50 per mg (or $150 per AF). The OCWD would provide the Districts an annual audit of O&M costs. Should the OCWD determine that they can no longer provide the Districts with GAP water, then the Districts would receive a 24-month notification from the OCWD that GAP water service will be reduced or eliminated. This would give the Districts adequate time to install their own small, modular water recycling facilities (discussed below). The present worth cost for the OCWD GAP option is $4.7 million. GAP water meets stringent DHS safety standards for recycled water. It is filtered and chlorinated at the OCWD facility. Use of this water in treatment processes that may produce a spray or involve potential human contact, affords maximum safety to Districts' employees. However, the GAP water contains a chlorine concentration of approximately 5 milligrams per liter (mg/L). This high concentration of chlorine has presented a problem in some of our treatment plant processes and therefore limits its use in certain applications. For example, chlorine apparently breaks down the chemicals used in polymer mixing requiring the Districts to use excessive amounts of polymer for biosolids dewatering at a considerably higher cost. We expect that this problem can be solved by the use of ultraviolet (UV) disinfection technology in lieu of chlorination as discussed later in this report. -4- Staff Report Supply of Recycled Water March 18, 1993 Another GAP water purchase option was originally proposed by OCWD. It would have required the Districts to pay the going retail rate for GAP water, currently at $497 per mg ($162 per AF) and reserve a 2,800 AF volume of GAP water. Its present worth cost is $14 million. This option was rejected by the Districts because of the less costly on-site option discussed below which has led to the O&M cost pricing structure. (B) Option 2 - On-Site Production of Recycled Water A study was conducted to determine the feasibility of the Districts producing their own recycled water using small, modular treatment facilities. These facilities would use UV light disinfection as opposed to high levels of chlorine. Such facilities would be under the Districts' control. The Districts could receive GAP water for the next two years until the facilities are installed. The present worth cost for installation of the Districts' own on-site water recycling treatment facilities is estimated at $7.6 million. On-site water recycling treatment facilities would be modular in nature and could be installed simply on a concrete pad, approximately 60 x 80 feet in size. The facilities would include filtration and disinfection by ultraviolet light (UV) treatment. A small amount of chlorine disinfectant would be added to prevent bacterial regrowth in the water distribution system. The facilities would have a 20-year life and back-up water to this system would be potable water supplies from the cities. The Districts' staff and consultant investigated the use of UV disinfection as a cost-effective alternative to high-dose chlorination. UV disinfection is desirable compared to chlorination as expenses are lower, large chlorine contact chambers are not required, and the risk of leaks from on-site chlorine storage is minimized. Although UV disinfection is a relatively new technology, there are more than 400 wastewater treatment plants in the United States that use UV systems and an estimated 100 to 200 more facilities are planning to use UV. Like GAP water, the recycled water produced by on-site facilities would meet the stringent DHS safety standards for the protection of the Districts' employees. Pathogen removal would be monitored by the Districts' laboratory staff. Water produced by on- site facilities would have only a small amount of residual chlorine to prevent bacterial regrowth and biofilm formation in pipes. Therefore, this water could be used in more treatment processes than OCWD's current recycled water can because of the GAP water's high chlorine level. � -5- l Staff Report Supply of Recycled Water March 18, 1993 4) ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT DISINFECTION PILOT PLANT TESTING Both districts are interested in maximizing the use of recycled water. To achieve that goal the Sanitation Districts desire recycled water without high residual chlorine. This can best be achieved with the use of UV disinfection. The OCWD also wants to evaluate UV disinfection for Phase II of GAP and for Water Factory 21. Therefore, both districts are interested in evaluating UV light disinfection as an alternative to chlorination. The results from these studies will benefit the Districts by providing information on the feasibility of using UV disinfection as a potential alternative disinfectant to chlorine. Staff from both agencies are recommending that a joint pilot plant test be conducted to determine the feasibility of UV disinfection for our respective water and wastewater treatment processes. A pilot test facility is available and a desirable site for testing has been determined adjacent to the GAP facility at the OCWD. Joint piloting efforts would require consulting services from a firm(s) with hands-on experience in UV disinfection and the required microbiological analyses. The OCWD would be the lead agency for the proposed pilot testing. The estimated cost for outside consulting services is $80,000 shared equally by the OCWD and the Districts. In addition, the Sanitation Districts would provide in-house laboratory services in an estimated amount of $40,000 for conducting microbiological analyses for the pilot plant. The OCWD would provide the labor and other in-house services to operate the pilot plant and conduct the testing. 5) CONCLUSIONS It is more economical, $4.7 million vs. $7.6 million present worth cost, for the Districts to buy GAP water than to install and operate small, modular water recycling facilities at Plants No. 1 and No. 2. In the future, should the OCWD determine that it is no longer able to supply the Districts with recycled water due to other community demands, then the Districts would have the option to install and operate small, modular water recycling facilities to meet its water needs. 6) RECOMMENDATIONS Staff recommends the following actions: A) Authorize staff to complete negotiations for an agreement with the OCWD in a form approved by the General Counsel, that would; 1) provide up to 50 mgd of secondary effluent to the OCWD for recycling purposes at no charge, with a provision to, at any time, reevaluate the valuation and pricing for secondary effluent; and 2) provide -6- �/ Staff Report Supply of Recycled Water March 18, 1993 for purchase of GAP water for 20 years at the audited cost to operate and maintain the GAP facility. (The current O&M cost is $460.50 per mg or $150 per AF). The contract would provide that the Districts' cost would not exceed the O&M cost or the lowest cost of any GAP customer, whichever is less. B) Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with the OCWD for pilot plant testing of UV light disinfection technology, costs to be shared equally in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the Districts' share of out-of-pocket costs for outside consulting services. (Estimated total cost to the Districts', including in-house laboratory services, is $80,000.) SMB:ahh Ref#230415.rp �r -7- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS el ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA tU9C<ELU9 AVENUE AGENDA ITEM NO. 16 yp Spy 9127 FWHgIN V1LLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272"127 March 30, 1993 71.199E-2Ar1 REPORT OF THE SPECIAL JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE RE: COMPUTERS Meeting Date: March 30, 1993 -- 5:30 0. m. COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF MEMBERS: William Mahoney, Joint Chairman Thomas M. Dawes, Director of Evelyn Hart, Vice Joint Chairman Engineering Charles Puckett, Chairman, Fiscal Wendy Sevenandt, Staff Policy Committee Engineer Steve Hovey, Manager of AB ENT: Information Services Gary Streed, Director of Buck Catlin, Past Joint Chairman Finance Peer Swan, Chairman, District No. 14 1 . Computerized Facilities Record and Drawings System. Job No. J-25-1. The Committee members reviewed the proposed Computerized Facilities Record and Drawings System, Job No. J-25-1 (see enclosed Staff Report). The Committee considered dividing the work into phases and reviewed the Scope of Work for the first phase and approved the list of firms to receive a Request For Proposal for the Phase I work. The Phase I work would include a Needs Assessment. This work would begin with the review of previously prepared staff work which outlines the broad scope of the project. The project will provide a computerized data logging and retrieving system to develop utility system drawings using as-built information. The Phase I work would identify sources of information, need for information, develop a conceptual system design, and make recommendations to produce a product that can be easily used and updated. The final outcome of the Phase I work would be the preparation of a detailed Scope of Work outlining the project for implementation. The Scope of Work would be used for Phases 11 and III. Phase II would be the development of plans and specifications to purchase the necessary computer hardware and software and evaluate computer systems; while Phase III would provide for the actual work (i.e.: development of plant and collection facilities record systems drawings). Staff estimates that the Phase I work will be about $125,000.00; while Phase II and III work would be approximately $2,075,000.00. `. 2. Recommendations The Committee recommends that the Boards of Directors approve the following actions: A. Approve the three-phase approach for the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawings Systems, Job No. J-25-1, and authorize preceding with implementation. B. Authorize the Special Selection Committee Re Computers to solicit proposals and negotiate Professional Services Contract(s) for the phased approach for consideration by the Boards. Final Committee recommendations will be brought back to the Boards of Directors for approval. TMD:jac ENGW-25-1\033093.scr Enclosure u ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 01 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA March 24, 1993 1p MIS AV NU6 flo WX 8127 F WAIN VLL .UUMAN1A 92n"127 91a196L2an STAFF REPORT Solicitation of Proposals for Computerized Facilities Record and Drawings System Job No. J-25-1 Phase I - Needs Assessment SUMMARY For sometime, the Special Joint Works Selection Committee has been considering a Computerized Facilities Record and Drawings System. The Committee members have decided to execute a phased approach to implement this project. This staff report describes the phases to be implemented, presents the Phase 1--Needs Assessment Scope of Work, and identifies potential firms qualified to receive Requests for Proposals. PROJECT PHASES A phased approach to assess the needs of the Districts, select the equipment and software to handle the data, and convert the data to electronic format will allow the Districts to obtain a quality product, yet allow the solicitation of fee proposals. This project is now proposed to be implemented in three phases with three separate professional services agreements. The three phases are summarized as follows: Phase I• The first phase would be a needs assessment to determine the characteristics and requirements of a computerized facility records and drawing system. This assessment will identify information to be included in the computerized map and database, set the priorities regarding information to be included during the initial data conversion to meet budgetary goals, estimate costs, develop a conceptual design for the system, evaluate and maximize the use of existing hardware and software, and address adherence to the Information Services Master Plan for computer systems. A project approach will be developed by the consultant which provides guidelines for the procurement of hardware and software, implementation of the system and management of the data. � 1 Phase II: The second phase provides for the selected firm to develop computer specifications for the acquisition of the computer hardware and software in conformance with the Information Services Master Plan, assist in the evaluation of hardware and software systems which will meet the needs identified in the first phase, and prepare plans for the layout of the system including network links at the Districts offices. Hardware and software would be procured and installed during this phase through the Districts' bid process. The Information Services Division will be heavily involved during the system evaluation and procurement. • Phase III• The third phase will provide for the selected firm to build the database structure allowing for expansion, develop CAD drawing standards, develop data management procedures, develop system operation manuals, provide data conversion, develop the maps for the plant and collection system drawings and record system, and provide training. A quality assurance and quality control plan for the conversion effort will be developed to include monitoring of production costs, verification of billing and monitoring the status of project. This third phase could include a pilot project to check results prior to full system implementation. The pilot project could cover a small portion of the plant to verify that the output is usable. The firm selected for the Phase I work need not necessarily be selected for Phases II and III. SCOPE OF WORE - PHASE I The Phase I--Needs Assessment Scope of Work is included as Attachment A. The project goals and characteristics of the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System are defined and the project description for Phase I is detailed. FIRMS FOR CONSIDERATION On May 6, 1992, presentations were made before the Special Joint Works Selection Committee by the following firms: 1. Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers/RJN Group, Inc. (A Joint Venture) 2. John Carollo Engineers/Boyle Engineering Corp./Psomas (A Joint Venture) 3. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. 2 �� An issue of concern has been discussed regarding the use of a y firm during the needs assessment that markets hardware or software. The objectivity of the firm may be lost since they would prefer to sell their product. Many wastewater design firms have developed computer software for the hydraulic modeling and design of collection systems. Further advancements have seen firms tie a hydraulic modeling program into a graphics program to show routing strategies and pipeline profiles. Having this expertise demonstrates the firm-s qualifications for performing collection system projects. The Districts' should benefit by considering only firms that have developed this expertise. The following firms could be considered for the needs assessment: 1) Black & Veatch teamed with PlanGraphics, Irvine, California Black & Veatch is an established consulting firm that has a strong background in wastewater design. In 1991, Black & Veatch formed a business alliance with PlanGraphics to share technical support to meet project requirements. PlanGraphics is an independent multidisciplinary consulting firm that specializes in the design and implementation of automated mapping and facilities management (AM/FM) and geographic information systems (GIS) . PlanGraphics has performed nearly 400 needs assessment projects for AM/FM and GIS. The City of Long Beach was contacted as a client reference for PlanGraphics for needs assessment and system selection consulting services for a GIS system. The contact recommended the firm highly and said that they would definitely consider the firm for additional work. The contact stated that Psomas did not perform well for the City and that a Boyle storm drain mapping project was not implemented as a true relational database. 2) Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates (RBF) , Irvine, California RBF is a full service consulting firm providing planning, engineering, surveying, GIS, and related professional services. RBF has a strong background in computer aided drafting and design and GIS implementation for roadways and underground utilities. RBF completed a GIS Master Plan for the Rancho California Watei District (RCWD) . The project parallels the work proposed in the CSDOC Facility Mapping project. They are currently in the implementation phase of the RCWD utility mapping project. As a part of the RCWD project, RBF is integrating RJN's "CASSWORKS" for sewer modeling and Oracle for the database. This experience with 3 CASSWORKS, GIS and Oracle would benefit the CSDOC project when integrating the Computerized Maintenance Management System. 3) Other firms that may qualify for providing services to conduct the needs assessment have just recently contacted the Engineering staff expressing an interest in the project. The firms are CH2MHill and Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. The Engineering staff would conduct an interview with a tour of the firm's computer/GIS facilities prior to selecting the firms as a recepient of a Request for Proposal. At the meeting, staff will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each firm. The committee members may now of other qualified firms that could be considered to perform the needs assessment. It is recommended that a short list be developed of two or more firms that would receive the Request for Proposals for the Scope of Work. Staff presents the following firms for consideration in making a short list: FIRM STRENGTHS Black & Veatch/P1anGraphics Wastewater Design Experience, FM/GIS Experience J.M. Montgomery Wastewater Design Experience, FM/GIS Experience RBF Wastewater Design Experience, FM/GIS Experience Carollo Wastewater Design Experience Boyle Wastewater Design Experience, Computerized Systems Development without Relational Database Lee & Ro Wastewater Design Experience RJN Wastewater Design Experience, FM/GIS Experience Camp Dresser & McKee Wastewater Design Experience, Some FM/GIS Experience implemented as tools for projects. CH2MHill Wastewater Design Experience, FM/GIS Experience 4 COST ESTIMATE The preliminary estimate of costs to conduct the studies and install the system is detailed on the next page and summarized below: DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION COSTS Consulting Services Phase I $ 125, 000 Phase II $ 75, 000 Phase III $2 ,000, 000 Total Consulting Services $2, 200, 000 Computer Equipment Hardware/Software $ 125, 000 Installation $ 10,000 Total Computer Equipment $ 135, 000 Districts Staff $ 465, 000 Total Development and Installation Cost $2,800,000 The estimated annual operation cost is based upon two full-time people at $45, 000 per year and an overhead rate of but. ANNUAL SYSTEM OPERATIONAL STAFFING COST $ 144,000 With minor reorganization within the Engineering Department, the positions necessary to develop, install and operate the system could be provided within existing authorized staffing levels and no new positions would have to be added. 5 COST ESTIMATE A. CONSULTING STAFF PHASE I - NEEDS ASSESSMENT Needs Assessment 400 hrs * $80/hr $ 32,000 Research Base Map 80 hrs * $80/hr $ 6,400 Conceptual Design 600 hrs * $80/hr $ 48,000 Cost Analysis 80 hrs * $80/hr $ 6,400 Implementation Plan 80 hrs * $80/hr $ 6,400 Procurement Approach 80 hrs * $80/hr $ 6,400 Technical Memorandum 160 hrs * $80/hr $ 12,800 Scope of Work 80 hrs * $80/hr $ 6 400 Bub-total Phase I 124,800 PHASE II - COMPUTER SYSTEM ACQUISITION Plans and Specifications 600 hrs * $80/hr $ 48,000 Systems Evaluation 160 hrs * $80/hr $ 12,800 Sub-total Phase II 60,800 PHASE III - SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT Database Development 1440 hrs * $80/hr $ 115,200 CAD Standards 320 hrs * $80/hr $ 25,600 Data Management Procedures 320 hrs * $80/hr $ 25,600 Operation Manuals 320 hrs * $80/hr $ 25,600 Data Conversion 11295 sheets * 2 hr/sht * $70/hr $1,581,300 Field Work 2080 hrs * $80/hr $ 166,400 Training 1000 hrs * $80/hr $ 80 000 Sub-total Phase III $2,019,700 consulting services Bub-total $2,195,700 ---------- B. COMPUTER EQUIPMENT Computer Equipment - Initial System $ 60,000 - $13,000 per Station * 5 $ 65,000 - Installation $ 10,000 Sub-total 335,000 C. DISTRICTS STAFF DRAWING DEVELOPMENT COSTS Duration of project 3 people * 2 yrs * $50,000/yr $ 300,000 overhead @ 60% $ 180,000 Sub-total 480,0 0 ORAMD TOTAL (A, 8, AND C) $2,810,700 ANNUAL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE CHARGES 2 people @ $45,000 per year $ 90,000 overhead @ 60E $ ""0V 47 ��e,uuu Ypdoc\"\1.25-1\032445.SR V ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 01 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA March 24, 1993 10B°°fL115°VEN1E V O W.8121 FMWMN VL Y.0 IFMNW 921 4127 r 7I4I962.2411 ATTACHMENT "A" SCOPE OF WORK Computerized Facilities Record and Drawings System Phase I Job No. J-25-1 I. SUMMARY Conduct a needs assessment to determine the characteristics and requirements for a computerized system which will be used to develop and maintain a facility and utility atlas of Reclamation Plant No. 1 , Treatment Plant No. 2 and interconnecting utilities, and a facilities layout, land use map and hydraulic model of the Districts' collection system. II. BACKGROUND To meet the Districts' growing wastewater load requirements and to comply with stringent federal and state environmental regulations, new facilities have been constructed and existing facilities have been modified through many construction contracts. Facilities have also been modified by the Districts' staff. Record drawings of the construction projects are kept on file. Although these drawings adequately document the facilities constructed, they do not describe the treatment process as a complete system comprised of the individual process units, utilities, system interfaces, instrumentation, and electrical network, nor are they cross referenced. Due to the layered construction of most treatment processes, information for the process systems must be located through many construction projects. Minor in-house modifications, including those made in an emergency, are not documented. With the continual expansion and modification of the District facilities, the ability to access process information readily is critical. Combining the information from project drawings, information gathered from Districts' staff, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS, W ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844EW6 AVENUE / and investigation of actual plant installations to generate a complete°4a'etlt%an map would be invaluable for design, operations, maintenance WnTAT EA TO 4 C N.A 8210E functions. 1/ An evaluation of the Trunk Sewer Conveyance System resulted from the 1989 Master Plan project. Land use areas were determined and flows projected. The data was entered, in spreadsheet format, to a hydraulic model to simulate flow through the trunk system and pump stations. The results of the model led to the recommendations for future expansion as described In the Master Plan. The land use mapping information and hydraulic modeling data are available In hardcopy for establishing a computerized system to be used by Districts' staff in locating information on the trunk sewers and projecting flows and system expansions. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The J-25 project will be implemented in three phases using three separate professional services agreements. The three phases are briefly described as follows: Ph : The first phase, this phase, is to conduct an assessment to determine the characteristics and requirements of a computerized facility records and drawing system. This assessment shall identify information to be included in the computerized map and database, develop a conceptual design for the system, evaluate and maximize the use of existing hardware and software, and address adherence to the Information Services Master Plan for computer systems. The needs assessment shall result in a project approach to procure hardware and software, implement the system and manage the data. The Consultant shall prepare a scope of work incorporating Districts' comments to accomplish the second phase. Phase II: The second phase will be to develop computer specifications for the acquisition of the computer hardware and software in conformance with the Information Services Master Plan, evaluate and procure hardware and software systems which will meet the needs identified in the first phase, and prepare plans for the layout of the system including network links at the Districts offices. The Consultant for this phase will prepare a scope of work for the third phase. -2 �� Phase III: The third phase will be to build the database structure allowing for expansion; develop CAD drawing standards, data management procedures, and system operation manuals; provide data conversion and develop the maps for the plant and collection system drawings and record system; and provide training. A quality assurance and quality control plan for the conversion effort will be developed to include monitoring of production costs, verification of billing and status of project. IV. TOTAL PROJECT GOALS The consultant shall understand the total project goals so that a proposal can be completed for the needs assessment portion of the project. The description below identifies the two mapping projects and the District's idea of information to be included for the drawings and a relational database. This information shall be refined through the needs assessment. The first project will produce an automated computer generated map depicting the facilities and utilities for Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley, Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach and all interconnecting utilities and facilities. A layered utility map will be completed to show all plant processes, utilities, and structures as they are actually installed. The second mapping project will be a facilities map, land use map and hydraulic modeling computer system portraying the Districts service area of Orange County with the Districts' trunk sewer system superimposed upon the base map of the service area. This system will generate a layered computer map which will classify the land use, show the collection system, maintain information pertinent to the collection system, and model the collection system for planning purposes. Further detail of what the Districts wish to accomplish with the Facilities Records and Drawings System is described below. This description is to act as a guide for the needs assessment. The task of producing the drawings or database will be performed under another phase. 1. PLANTS AND INTERCONNECTING UTILITIES A. FACILITY AND UTILITY MAP A facility and utility computerized mapping system with a relational database will be implemented for Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment �..i -3- r Plant No. 2 as well as all interconnecting utilities which shall depict each plant as a group of processes which are interrelated to make a complete system. These maps will show the plants in plan view, with all tanks, basins, buildings, diversion structures, roadways, equipment, piping, valves, gates, stop logs, weirs, other piping appurtenances, manholes, underground pull boxes, power distribution panels, power distribution transformers, motor control centers, branch circuit panels, motors, free standing control panels, computer work stations, duct banks, telephone and data networks, fiber optics, conduits, cable raceways, and the point of electric service (with meter number) shown. The drawings will use the Districts established plant coordinate and grid system. All coordinates which are field verified will be indicated as such. A base map for each plant will be developed in a layered method to show the plant perimeter, river and other surrounding features, roadways, tunnels, duct banks, tanks, and a footprint of basins, buildings and other structures. All existing facilities and facilities under construction will be included and identified. Tunnels, duct banks and roadways will also be identified. Topographic features and the superimposition of areal photographs with the facility maps will be included if the assessment phase recommends a system with these capabilities. All utilities will be depicted in a layered method as developed in the conceptual design for this project with the option to select specific utilities for viewing and printing. Sectional views at areas of intensive piping and cross sections of various areas in tunnels and at tunnel intersections will be produced. These sections will be accessible from the graphics screen through menu driven commands. Cross-sections will identify the elevation of the utilities, pipe service and size, conduits and cable trays. Cross-section drawings will be created in sufficient quantity such that there is no section in the tunnels which does not have a representative cross-section drawing. References between the plan view and the cross-sections are required. Categories of pipe service will be as identified in the 1991 Edition of the Standard Specifications. Piping information which will be shown on the drawings include line size, material of construction, process flow direction, and the process material being conveyed. This information can be in a code form developed in the standards. -4- Identification of conduit size and contents of the duct banks will be included. Capabilities will be provided to allow the generation of a conduit schedule. Information will be contained in a relational database which identifies construction projects by Districts' job numbers and makes reference to shop drawings. Through computer commands, the information will appear in the respective areas on the drawing or printed in a report format. 2. COLLECTION SYSTEM A computer aided facilities management and modeling system will be established at the District offices to allow data access, data control, facilities mapping and collection system planning by District personnel. The computer system will consist of a central relational database linked with the CAD system for mapping and a hydraulic modeling program for the sewer system. The facility map shall show: The entire Districts service area District boundaries Drainage basin boundaries Composite land use map showing planning zones City, County, and State roads and highway right-of-ways The complete collection system including pump stations, pipes, diversion structures, manholes and nodes Facilities numbering system for easy reference Land parcels in the unincorporated area of District 7 System software with the capability of measuring land areas to eliminate hand planimetering methods should be provided. The software will automatically store area data to appropriate spaces in the relational database. Modeling software shall give Districts' personnel the ability to determine sewage flow projections, insert new sewage lines, determine the normal and optimal routing of sewage flows, and assess impacts of expansion and growth. Through the facility map and relational database, the system shall have the capability for data storage and manipulation and report generation. At a minimum, the information shall consist of: -5- The Consultant must provide a statement acknowledging that no kickbacks, fees or remuneration of any type may be received from any manufacturer or supplier for which a recommendation is made on the project. In submitting a proposal, the Consultant must acknowledge that the proposal is based on a comprehensive and complete review of the request for proposal including this scope of work which is an attachment to the request for proposal. VIII. SCHEDULE The tentative schedule for this project is as follows: Approval of Professional Services Agreement: DAY 1 Completion of Needs Assessment Technical Memorandum: DAY 1 + 8 MONTHS - Completion of Phase II and III Scope of Work: DAY 1 + 9 MONTHS The Consultant shall develop a graphic schedule to display the proposed schedule above with milestones identified. This schedule must be revised and submitted monthly with the monthly project status report. STAFF ASSISTANCE The Districts' staff member assigned to work with the Consultant on the project is Wendy Sevenandt, (714) 962-2411. wpdoc%engy-25-1\sow -12 Identification of conduit size and contents of the duct banks will be included. Capabilities will be provided to allow the generation of a conduit schedule. Information will be contained in a relational database which identifies construction projects by Districts' job numbers and makes reference to shop drawings. Through computer commands, the information will appear in the respective areas on the drawing or printed in a report format. 2. COLLECTION SYSTEM A computer aided facilities management and modeling system will be established at the District offices to allow data access, data control, facilities mapping and collection system planning by District personnel. The computer system will consist of a central relational database linked with the CAD system for mapping and a hydraulic modeling program for the sewer system. The facility map shall show: The entire Districts service area District boundaries Drainage basin boundaries Composite land use map showing planning zones City, County, and State roads and highway right-of-ways The complete collection system including pump stations, pipes, diversion structures, manholes and nodes Facilities numbering system for easy reference Land parcels in the unincorporated area of District 7 System software with the capability of measuring land areas to eliminate hand planimetering methods should be provided. The software will automatically store area data to appropriate spaces in the relational database. Modeling software shall give Districts' personnel the ability to determine sewage flow projections, insert new sewage lines, determine the normal and optimal routing of sewage flows, and assess impacts of expansion and growth. Through the facility map and relational database, the system shall have the capability for data storage and manipulation and report generation. At a minimum, the information shall consist of: L/ -5- This system must be able to handle the information described above for the Plants and Interconnecting Utilities and the Collection System and the Power System Studies, Job No. J-25-2. This computer system will be used to incorporate changes to the master files Including new plans, record drawings, maintenance changes, and associated data. Planning for the integration of the mapping systems with the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) shall be addressed in the needs assessment. RJN's CASSWORKS is the CMMS which is in the stage of being implemented. Data used in the CMMS which overlaps with the mapping systems shall be identified. Functions that the Maintenance Division could perform with the aid of computerized mapping system shall be identified and the method to integrate the system functions shall be discussed. A graphic depiction of the system configuration and information flaw path shall be developed. Interface with other systems shall be shown with the system configuration. A description of system interface requirements shall be provided. The needs assessment shall clearly delineate the requirements for system integration as opposed to system interfacing. 2. Recommendation for Base Maps For the collection system, the consultant shall investigate mapping systems completed by other agencies that cover the Districts service area. The source agencies, costs, accuracy, and level of detail for the mapping systems shall be identified. Comparisons shall be made between the base maps available and the Districts' needs for the collection system mapping and modeling. Recommendation shall be made for procurement of the collection system base map which is the most cost effective. Reformatting to meet the Districts' needs shall be identified and procedures to periodically update the base map using the source agencies database shall be produced. If the source agency documents are not adequate, other methods of acquiring the data shall be identified and costs estimated to generate the base map. For the plants and interconnecting utilities, the consultant shall Identify the method for developing the base map and level of accuracy obtainable. The entities and data to be entered into the base map shall be determined and layers assigned. Identification of conduit size and contents of the duct banks will be included. Capabilities will be provided to allow the generation of a conduit schedule. Information will be contained in a relational database which identifies construction projects by Districts' job numbers and makes reference to shop drawings. Through computer commands, the information will appear in the respective areas on the drawing or printed in a report format. 2. COLLECTION SYSTEM A computer aided facilities management and modeling system will be established at the District offices to allow data access, data control, facilities mapping and collection system planning by District personnel. The computer system will consist of a central relational database linked with the CAD system for mapping and a hydraulic modeling program for the sewer system. The facility map shall show: The entire Districts service area District boundaries Drainage basin boundaries Composite land use map showing planning zones City, County, and State roads and highway right-of-ways The complete collection system including pump stations, pipes, diversion structures, manholes and nodes Facilities numbering system for easy reference Land parcels in the unincorporated area of District 7 System software with the capability of measuring land areas to eliminate hand planimetering methods should be provided. The software will automatically store area data to appropriate spaces in the relational database. Modeling software shall give Districts' personnel the ability to determine sewage flow projections, insert new sewage lines, determine the normal and optimal routing of sewage flows, and assess impacts of expansion and growth. Through the facility map and relational database, the system shall have the capability for data storage and manipulation and report generation. At a minimum, the information shall consist of: � -5- Facilities reference number (Station #, ID # or other identification) Sewer reference names �O Construction contract number and date Location and limits of sewer lines Pipe elevation, size, material of construction, coating or liner, roughness Record slope of pipe Flow monitoring data (design d/D ratio, velocity, flowrate) Type and size of manholes Surface elevation and diameter of manhole ring and cover Surface elevation of surrounding land or street Invert elevation of pipe entering manhole Invert elevation of pipe leaving manhole Distance between manholes Pump station locations Pumping equipment data Force Main length and size Modeled D/d ratio, velocity, and capacity Excess capacity District 7 (unincorporated area) track number, connection permit nos., dates, and addresses Industrial dischargers to corresponding manholes or nodes Additional data determined valuable will be added into the system. The database software will automatically import all data generated by the sewer model and provide for report generation. Report formats will be developed with the Districts input. The goal of this project is to not duplicate the information included in the existing maintenance management system, but to link the projects together to make all maintenance information accessible and perform modeling and data retrieval while in the graphics screen. The Consultant shall gather, review, and integrate the existing record data provided by the Districts and data from the 1989 Master Plan gravity system computer model. The results of the 1989 Master Plan modeling effort will be reproduced via this integrated computer aided facilities management, information and modeling system. Hardcopy gravity system maps at 1"=4000' scale and hardcopy color coded land use mapping at 1"=4000' will be available at the Districts office. Hardcopy tabulations of model system input data and output reports and model schematics will be available at the Districts' office. -6- Note that existing system model data includes only those manhole nodes necessary to account for points of inflow to the CSDOC system, '..� diversions, and changes in pipe size or slope. WORK ELEMENTS The Consultant shall provide a needs assessment for a computer aided facility and information management system to manage the Districts' records and drawings. The assessment shall refine the system descriptions above and determine the characteristics and requirements of the computerized map and relational database system through the tasks described below. 1. Assess the Needs of the Districts' Divisions The consultant shall conduct meetings and interviews with Districts' staff from various Divisions to the assess the functional requirements of the Divisions and identify mapping uses and database information. From the meetings and interviews, a list of potential applications for the automated mapping system shall be developed. From the list of potential applications, the priorities for the project shall be identified through discussion with Districts staff. The assessment shall establish the graphic information and non-graphic data �./ to be entered during the initial data capture and the data to be entered for the long range goals. The activities the system is to perform and performance requirements shall be described. The number of system users shall be identified along with projected growth estimates. An assessment of the source data shall be made to catalog the availability, quality, location of information, and quantity of information to be stored. The source data shall be identified and specific details for available data shall be summarized including location of information, format, accuracy of data and conversion methods for each data type. The needs assessment shall address the Districts' planned applications, assess the Districts existing computer systems and incorporation of the existing equipment with the,planned system, discuss additional equipment needs, address existing and planned system used by Orange County and the cities served by the Districts, systems used by other Consultants and Contractors who have projects with the Districts, assess the availability of personnel qualified to use the system through the three project phases and system operations, and assess the cost of system implementation and operation. -7 This system must be able to handle the information described above for the Plants and Interconnecting Utilities and the Collection System and the Power System Studies, Job No. J-25-2. This computer system will be used to incorporate changes to the master files including new plans, record drawings, maintenance changes, and associated data. Planning for the integration of the mapping systems with the Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) shall be addressed in the needs assessment. RJN's CASSWORKS is the CMMS which is in the stage of being implemented. Data used in the CMMS which overlaps with the mapping systems shall be identified. Functions that the Maintenance Division could perform with the aid of computerized mapping system shall be identified and the method to integrate the system functions shall be discussed. A graphic depiction of the system configuration and information flow path shall be developed. Interface with other systems shall be shown with the system configuration. A description of system interface requirements shall be provided. The needs assessment shall clearly delineate the requirements for system integration as opposed to system interfacing. 2. Recommendation for Base Maps For the collection system, the consultant shall investigate mapping systems completed by other agencies that cover the Districts service area. The source agencies, costs, accuracy, and level of detail for the mapping systems shall be identified. Comparisons shall be made between the base maps available and the Districts' needs for the collection system mapping and modeling. Recommendation shall be made for procurement of the collection system base map which is the most cost effective. Reformatting to meet the Districts' needs shall be identified and procedures to periodically update the base map using the source agencies database shall be produced. If the source agency documents are not adequate, other methods of acquiring the data shall be identified and costs estimated to generate the base map. For the plants and interconnecting utilities, the consultant shall identify the method for developing the base map and level of accuracy obtainable. The entities and data to be entered into the base map shall be determined and layers assigned. -8- 3. Formulate Conceptual Design +.� The consultant shall develop a conceptual design that defines the applications for the various Divisions, lists the system data requirements, identifies graphic information and layers and non-graphic attributes, defines needs regarding data and drawing management, identifies means to manage data and maintain the system, identifies responsible Divisions for maintaining information, develops report formats and identifies staffing and training requirements. The conceptual design shall establish standards for the drawings. A conceptual database model shall be developed that shows the data structure for the graphic and non-graphic attributes and how the data is accessed. The conceptual design shall include a general configuration of the hardware and software and address expandability. The conceptual design must take into account the Districts' Information Services Division Master Plan for computer systems. The configuration shall show the proposed locations, type of work stations, software configuration, location and type of peripherals, data storage requirements, network connections and servers, and the interface with existing equipment. The use of existing resources shall be considered in the conceptual design. The consultant shall evaluate conceptual system design alternatives and describe potential vendor packages for the hardware and software. The consultant shall analyze the costs and benefits of the alternatives. 4. Analyze the Costs and Benefits of the Conceptual Design The consultant shall analyze the recommended conceptual design for its costs during start-up and long-term operation and maintenance. These cost estimates shall be balanced against the anticipated benefits of implementation to determine general budgeting requirements and payback period. 5. Prepare an Implementation Plan The consultant shall formulate a staged implementation strategy for first implementing a pilot project and then moving to full system implementation. Recommendations for the budget requirement and Districts staffing needs shall be made for the stages of the implementation plan. Tasks shall be identified and a schedule developed. Responsibilities for accomplishing the tasks shall be assigned. -9- The planning strategy shall result in a plan that takes the broad scope of the Districts' needs into account. At this juncture, the Districts' Board of Directors may need to review and approve the plans for the implementation 1%9+� of a pilot project. 6. Hardware and Software Procurement Approach A project approach to procure hardware and software shall be produced. As a minimum, hardware and software shall be evaluated on features, data Integration capabilities, Incorporation of Industry standard formats, adherence to the Districts' Information Services Master Plan for computer system acquisition, performance, user interface, equipment cost, software cost, functionality in handling Districts' needs, compatibility with existing systems, reliability, expandability, ease of learning and ease of use. The Information Services Division has developed a Master Plan for acquiring computer equipment and is described in the Staff Report included as Exhibit 1. The Staff Report included as Exhibit 2 updates this Master Plan. This Master Plan and industry approved standards shall be assessed for system selection. Deviations in system selection not consistent with this Master Plan or industry standards must be justified in the needs assessment document. Compatibility or system integration with the Computerized Maintenance Management System shall be considered and addressed. Other information which the Consultant perceives to be important in the selection shall be included in the needs assessment. The assessment shall address links to the existing networks, system configuration and software programs necessary including but not limited to drafting program, database, modeling program, file manager, and a text editor. 7. Needs Assessment Technical Memorandum A report shall be generated that summarizes all aspects of the needs assessment as outlined above and as determined pertinent to the selection of the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawings System. Five copies of this report shall be submitted to the Districts for review and comment. Ten bound final copies of the document incorporating all comments shall be submitted to the Districts. 8. Scope of Work for Phase II The Consultant shall prepare a scope of work to accomplish the second phase of the project. The second phase scope of work shall cover, but not -1 O `� be limited to, design of the system, system acquisition specifications, pilot program, database construction requirements, hardware and software A procurement services including evaluation of systems, and development of phase three scope of work. All districts comments shall be incorporated into a final scope of work. IV. PRE-DESIGN MEETING Prior to beginning work, a meeting with Districts' staff shall be held to establish appropriate contacts and review the Consultant's plan to implement this work. V. MEETINGS Project status meetings shall be held a minimum of once a month between the Districts' and the Consultant's project managers. Additional meetings shall be held as necessary. All meeting must be documented by the Consultant with a concurrence of that documentation by the Districts' project manager. VI. MONTHLY REPORTS Monthly progress reports shall be submitted for review and must include as a minimum: 1) current activities, 2) future activities, 3) potential out-of-scope items, 4) concerns and possible delays, 5) percentage of completion, and 6) budget status. VII. QUALITY ASSURANCE (GA) The Consultant shall administer a program of QA procedures for producing quality work. Specific procedures shall cover, but not be limited to, planning, coordination, checking, reviewing, and scheduling the work. All documents prepared by the Consultant shall be subject to the Consultant's in-house procedures prior to submittal to the Districts for review. Each submittal shall be accompanied by a written statement from the principal-in-charge of the project which states that the documents have been reviewed and indicates who has checked the documents being submitted. Substitution of the project manager by the Consultant will require the approval of the Districts. The project is subject to cancellation if this approval is not obtained by the Districts. �./ -11- The Consultant must provide a statement acknowledging that no kickbacks, fees or remuneration of any type may be received from any manufacturer or supplier for which a recommendation is made on the project. In submitting a proposal, the Consultant must acknowledge that the proposal is based on a comprehensive and complete review of the request for proposal including this scope of work which is an attachment to the request for proposal. Vill. SCHEDULE The tentative schedule for this project is as follows: • Approval of Professional Services Agreement: DAY 1 • Completion of Needs Assessment Technical Memorandum: DAY 1 + 8 MONTHS Completion of Phase II and III Scope of Work: DAY 1 + 9 MONTHS The Consultant shall develop a graphic schedule to display the proposed schedule above with milestones identified. This schedule must be revised and submitted monthly with the monthly project status report. STAFF ASSISTANCE The Districts' staff member assigned to work with the Consultant on the project is Wendy Sevenandt, (714) 962-2411. wpdo6eng\1-25-1\sow -12- `� •t COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA ' 1O ELL6 AVENUE Eo W.Va y..t K)R u SM84127 !� aluacx-Xlt RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS APRIL 14, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. u a � FUND NO 9199 - JT DISI WORKING UFITAE PROCESSING GATE 3/G4/93 FAGS 1 COUNTY NUMtlLR AV93 COUNTY ILAT SANITATION DISTRICTS OS OF ORANGE COUNTT CLAIMS PAID L3/10/93 POSTING OAiE u3/1C/93 a WARRANT N0. yENUUN AMOUNT Bt5CP1%ION 128330 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES $804.8. SERVICE AGREEMENT ;I 128331 AMERICAN 7LLEPHOhL 6 IELE6PAPH 11.3.3.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES r 128332 " ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP 125.710.OG ENGINE TESTING SERVICES M.0.11-18-92 . 128333 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC 471.70 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS 128334 ALFA-LAVAL INC 4170.a4 BOOK 126335 ALLIED SUPPLY CO S078.89 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES �. 126336 BLAKE P ANDERSON 5144.91 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT n 128337 A-FLU$ SYSTEMS $4,138.41 NOTICES 6 ADS Cl 12831E APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS INC $145.71 LAS SUPPLIES IT7 fib. 128339 ABC LABORATORIES $235.00 LAB SERVICES z 128340 ARATEA SERVICES INC 35.000.87 UNIFORM RENTALS t7 128341 ARMOR - VAC 1.47.6. VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES n ® 128342 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC 1494.15 WASTE MAULING FEES 128343 ART WORKS $18.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES m - 128344 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. 1I.236.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL 3 r 128345 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CU $506.43 TRUCK PARTS 120346 AWARDS A TROPHIES $140.85 AWARDS 6 PLAQUES 3t - 128347 BIT PORTABLE SERVICES $85.31 RENTAL EQUIPMENT W 9 12834E BAN LANDFILL 1/.665.64 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 128349 BRY SAFETY 6 SUPPLY $1,133.86 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128350 BAKER PLYWOOD CG INC 51.927.13 BUILDING MATERIALS �. 128351 BARCLAYS LAY PUBLISHERS 1243.60 BOOKS r 128352 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 1709.82 BATTERIES 128353 BAKER COMPRESSOR 1684.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES O 128354 BAAIER DIAGNOSTICS INC 14.953.61 LAB SUPPLIES N 1288355 BEACH PAVING INC. 34.200.00 PAVING SERVICES 128356 DON C BEATTIE P.E. $200.60 MACHINE REPAIRS • 128357 BELL SECURITY $15.76b.30 TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES 12835E YT DILLARD INC 5225.41 MACHINE REPAIRS " -- 128359 -' BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. 38tl.37 LAB SUPPLIES N - 128360 BISHOP COMPANY $212.45 TOOLS 128361 BOLh RINGER MANNHEIM $233.19 LAB SUPPLIES 128362 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $38.60 RADIATOR REPAIRS 0 128363 BORNEMANN PUMPS. INC $22,903.26 PUMP PARTS 228364 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP 435.973.85 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-20 ` - 128365 BRLNNER-FIEDLER L ASSOC IN $173.47 PUMP PARTS 128366 BROOKLYN THERMOMEIL6 Cu IN $109.55 LAB SUPPLIES 128367 BUILDER-S EMPORIUM $i9.49 HARDWARE/LUMBER 128368" THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFF 1465.00 SUBSCRIPTION � . 128369 BURKE ENGINEERING CO 1,34.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS 128370 GARY G SYNCED $5,308.13 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT " 228371 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY 170b.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES . 128372 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS. IML $3,361.53 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128373 IS COMPANY 41.357.22 VALVE PARTS -" 1283Ti 2993 CWPCA CONFLKENCE $2.232.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 1. 120375 CAL-FAC CHCMICAL CO INC $237.69 CHEMICALS n FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/C4/93 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP93 _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF GRANGE COUNTY �i .. CLAIMS FAIU 03/10/93 POSTING OgTC 43/10/97 WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 128376 CALTROL INC 35..8 O.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 128377 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $312.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128378 JOHN CAROLLO EMCINEERS $9.161.L5 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36 128379 CENTURY SAFETY 1NST 1 SUFP S8.o96.OS SAFETY SUPPLIES 128380 BRUCE CHAPMAN 45.000.LG DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 128381 CLARK CONSULTANTS 5308C.G: CONSULTING SERVICES r 128382 COLICH AND SONS $9629241,60 CONSTRUCTION I-9 n 128383 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER 1585.b9 2-WAY RADIO EQUIPMENT 228384 COMPRESSOR COMPONLNTS OF CA 33.136.7b PUMP PARTS m 0 128385 COMPUSA, INC. 1274.57 COMPUTER SOFTWARE Z 129386 CONNELL GM PARIS / DIV $50.91 TRUCK PARTS D 126387 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST S4.926.73 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 128388 CONSOLIDATED FREIWHIWAVS 1452.8b FREIGHT CHARGES 12b389 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 52.764.DL TOOLS 128390 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $,.6:6.15 CHLORINE 3 A. 128391 CONTINCNTAL GRAFHICS s120.3. OFFICE SUPPLIES 126392 CONTROLCO 1602.3b ELECTRIC PARTS # 228393 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $584.24 TRUCK PARTS 00 , 128394 COSTAR CONF SEB6.77 LAB SUPPLIES 128395 COUNTY WHOLESALE LLECINIC 15'..63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1 128396 CHARLES P CRUWLEV CO 5376.2L INSTRUMENT PARTS 128397 OML INC 31.3b4.67 ENGINE PARTS n 128398 0 6 S CONVEYORS $1.332.60 CONVEYOR REPAIRS f— 128399 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 3466.56 TIRES O • 128460 DAPPER TIRL 4742.40 TIRES 126401 PETER C DAVID Cu 5172.32T.24 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2 (n 1284C2 PETER C DAVID CU $1.3,654.17 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2 128403 DEAVLR MANUFACTURING CO. 1327.65 TRUCK PARTS A 128404 DECRA-TREND 1199.0 HARDWARE 128495 BE GIIELLE & SONS GLASS CO $29.09 BUILDING MATERIALS 128406 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 53.750.51 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-12-92 In - 128407 DIFILIPPO ASSGCIAILS $677.21 PRINTING '- 128408 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 5751.04 COMPUTER SOFTWARE ' 128409 SYCON CORP $137.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128410 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $2.13b.94 OFFICE FURNITURE 128411 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN $13,810.66 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL _ 128412 DURADO ENTERPRISLS INC $44#972,16 PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS 128413 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANT Sb2O.OG SERVICE AGREEMENT 128414 OURO-SENSE CORP 1177.bb MECHANICAL PARTS 220415 EASTMAN INC 52.940.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128416 FCOANALYSIS INC 5220.06 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 128417 ECONOMICS FREES INC $2,704.50 PUBLICATIONS 128415 EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SPEC 1659.86 EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS 128419 ELECT AIN TOOL CU $2,973.69 MECHANICAL PARTS 128420 ELECTRU DYNAMIC SERVICES $3.220.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ELECTRICAL A 128422 ENCHANTER INC 11,480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 ri W I_ FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PNDLLSSINb DATE 3/U4/93 PAGE 3 FEF ORT NUMBER AP44 Y _ COUNTY SANITATIONDISTR ICI3 OF uDANUE COUNTY L�I•I .., _, ., .. CLAIMS FAIU i313/1U/9] POSTING GATE C3/lC/93 WARRANT N01 yEFUOfl AHDUNI DLSCRI-IION 128422 ESSENCE GROUP 6399.21 OFFICE EQUIPMENT I : 128423 CHARLES EVANS A ASSOC. 3820041.UC LAB SERVICES M.O.11-18-92 128424 FALCON DISPOSAL SERyICL 331e40.LG RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 122425 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP S96.CG AIR FREIGHT 128426 FISCHER A PORTER CO 35r253.Cb CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 126427 FISHER SCIEN71FIC Co ab.bU4.27 LAB SUPPLIES 128426 FISONS INSTRUMENTS i2b2.9a LAB SUPPLIES 128429 FLO-SYSTEMS $3129L.07 PUMP PARTS G'1 128436 FLUID HANOLINU SYSTEMS 5116.LU PUMP PARTS m ■ 128431 FLUID TECH $956.66 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES Z 128432 FOLSOM LAKE FORD 310.506.24 VEHICLE M.O.4-8-92 CJ y 128434 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 470b.63 FILM 128435 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $170.12 PAINT SUPPLI88 m 128435 FOE INDUSTRIAL SALES 31]0.12 MECHANICAL PARTS m - 128437 RE OM IMAGING CO s3.$57.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS 3 120438 - FREEDOM INFULLE $25.53 WATERSERVICE AGREEMENT # 128439 CITY OF FULLER TON 325.53 WATER RUSE E 128440 GARRATAbL LUMBER CU 311128.11 HARDWACHEMICALS 128441 GARRATT-IBERGLAS COMPANY INSTALLERS NSTAL i3.943.81 CHEMICALS I 128442 GATES R FIBERGLASS INSTALL LCO 51,021.5. PUMP PARTS 128443 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. a1.024.50 ELECTRIC SUPPLI88 128444 GENERAL TELEPHONE CU $224.3L TELEPHONE SERVICES r 128445 LIFE TECHNOLOGIES/6INC 0/BhL i168.54 LAB SUPPLIES 128446 SICRLICH-NITCHLLL INC ix.436.54 FILM PARTS C7 ■ 128447 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 5330.80 FILM 128448 OBN GREEN 3 ASSOCIATES 32.245.G.. SURVEYING 86RVICE9 M.0.6-10-92 128449 - HAARER EQUIPMENT CO 4875.3U TRUCE PARTS 128450 EACH SIGN aL 136.43 LAB SUPPLI88 C"1 128451 PARR INGTDN INUUSTRI AL {LASTI a136.43 ELECTRIC PARTS 128452 PC HAWN CO INC S586.09 COMPRESSOR PARTS N - 128453 MOEH HUGHE CVO CALIF INC ,709.25 COMPRESSOR PARTS 129454 RS MUGHES CO INC 11,032.50 PAINT SUPPLIES 126455 CITY OF HU BEACH ON BEACH i11.032.50 WATER FFIC USE 1 128456 IMPERIAL BEACH NUBBLE SIA 330.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128457 INDUSTRI WEST INFORMATION xI iJ64133.00 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0,11-15-92 128457 -- INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ATION CO.YTN$ a1]3.00 SAFES 128458 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SHOE C a3$068.56 SAFETY SHOES 12646D INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS .266.13 CONNECTORS _ 128461 INGRAM PAPER $11166.94 OFFICE SUPPLI88 • 128462 IRVINE RANCH .SATERANI R151SIC1 $665.1. JATERNITORIAL USE RI 128463 JGRLAIENSE WESTERN INSTRUMENTS SUPP S685.1. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 128463 JOHNST 1N S TRUXEN TB CO a105.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS . 120465 JONESTOCH SUPPLY 3186.43 ELECTRIC PARTS 12P465 JORD$ CHEMICALS INC 32.$78.46 CHEMICALS INSTRUMENT 126467 - RELL AN CONTROLS INC 737.46 INSTRUMENT � 12b46T xELLY F1PE COCY $737.]0 PLUMBING SUPPLI69 W _ Y FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST VOPMING CAI'i IAL PROCLSSINb DAIL 3/64/93 PAGE 4 -!� REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .I CLAIMS PAID 13/10/93 PUSTIN6 DATE 63/1./93 �1 WARRANT NO. VLNUUR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 12P468 KING BEARING INC $4,234.14 MACHINE SUPPLIES 128469 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPFLIL4 s1.39E.44 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128470 MARTIN KORDICK SR S2,041.94 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 128471 LA TRONICS S47b.19 CAMERA 126472 LAYMANr JONES 1 DYE. LAWVEKS >1.615u5 LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER INDUSTRIES 128473 LEGI-TECH $320.U0 COMPUTER SERVICES op 128474 LECO CORPORATION 49b2.99 LAB SUPPLIES n 12B475 LEW CO ELECTRIC CN 1334.6E TRUCK PARTS 128476 LIEBER7 CORPORATION 1S64.74 FREIGHT m AA 126477 COUNTY SANITATION OISIMILT 1139r964.LG POOLED EHIS. ESTIM. PLAN M.0.12-13-89 2 128478 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $933.33 OCEAN MONITORING ' 128479 KPS 91b.44 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES . 126480 MACOMCu >320.bb SERVICE AGREEMENT 12B4B1 MAb11ETEK NATIONAL LLECTRIL ".657.L3 ELECTRIC PARTS —1 126482 MAN 7EK 9323.42 JANITORIAL SUPPLIER 3 _ 120403 "ARVAC ELECTRONICS $150.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES - 128484 MATT CHLUN INC SI.556.96 VALVE PARTS 128485 MCCOV SHEET METAL WORKS IN $189.64 ELECTRIC PARTS 00 128486 MICNOAGE uF CEMRIIUS >3.527.14 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 128487 MIDWAY MFG G MACHINING >2.370.5u MECHANICAL PARTS 12848E MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $190.82 FITTINGS 128489 MISSION INDUSTRIES s1.724.66 SAFETY SUPPLIES n 128490 MITCHCLL INSTRU"ENT CD 3969.46 ELECTRIC PARTS r 128491 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION 3297.10B.0G CONSTRUCTION 2-30 �y AN 128492 NATIONAL FIRE PNOTLCTIUII AS $569.22 SAFETY SUPPLIES 120493 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES I4L .756.06 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES CF1 - 128494 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL S138.70 SAFETY FILM RENTALS A i 128495 CITY OF NLWPORI HLACX 32c.2e WATER USE 12B496 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SEPV ICLS 3515.51 SAFETY GLASSES 126497 - THE OMMART COMP $1,292.15 INSTRUMENT PARTS - - 12849E DA SVSILKS CO 134.4G1.Ob CHLORINE M.0.30-9-91 Cn 120499 ORACLE CORPORATION >700.b4 TRAINING REGISTRATION 128500 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL 3131.19 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES r 128501 ORANGE COAST PETROLLUM EGUIF $.340.6. TRUCK PARTS 128502 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO, FARTS C SN1.20 TRUCK PARTS 126503 ORANGE COURIER S261.6C FREIGHT * 128501 04AN6E VALVL G F1171kb CU. 11.239.22 FITTINGS 128505 OR 6 ANON TEKNIIIA >1u2.36 LAS SUPPLIES 128506 ORITEK CORP SI.812.10 PUMP PARTS 128907 OXYGEN SLAVICL Scru41.98 SPECIALTY GASES 12B50B COG N 7V SANITATION UISTRICT S1r9BB.14 WORKERS COMP INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT 128509 PSI .153.62 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 9 128510 PS SI 41.32b.50 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 128511 PACIFIC FARTS >449.31 INSTRUMENT 128512 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $1.195.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES � . 228523 PACIFIC BELL 3453.2E TELEPHONE SERVICES a FUND NO 9159 - JT DIST WORKING CA{IiAI PROCESSING DATL 3/.4/93 PAGE 5 ALPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY NUMBER AP93 CLAIMS PAID .3/10/93 POSTING DATE 03/16/93 WARRANT NO. VLNDUN AMOUNT uESCR1PTlON • /. 128511 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C 668.44 RENTAL EQUIPMENT •.I 128515 PACTEL MERIDIAN SVSTLMS $1,627.5. TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 128516 PADRE JANITORIAL BUFF 52.192.79 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES . I 128517 PAK WEST 51.132.88 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 228510 PALMIERI. T1LEA, WIENER, 6b63.b5 LEGAL SERVICES 14-1-IA 128519 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 126520 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION 65.1.25 LAB SUPPLIES or. 128521 PTTNIY BOWES 6530..O SERVICE AGREEMENT G") 126522 PITNEY BOWLS CREDIT LORP S163.18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE FTI 128523 POLYMI,TNICS. INC. 51.13W.05 SERVICE AGREEMENT z I28524 POLYFURE INC s p li$161.75 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 n 128525 POWER ON SLABS SUPPLY CO $228.40 LLBCTRIC SUPPLIES P 128521 PRECISION IS IOb SLABS BLOWING 322tl.10 LAB BUPPLIB3 128527 bAROLD PRIMR 4SE ICE 5126.06 ICE m h . 128529 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $4,160.04 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 3 128529 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS 5..334.83 ELECTRIC PARTS 128530 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO 13.138.82 TRASH REMOVAL 128531 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO 4121.41 LAB SUPPLIES d 128532 RECYC INC $29,467.95 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 128533 REMOTE MLTER NLSETTINR SVST 65.0E0.00 POSTAGE 120534 COMMUNITY BUSINESS WMAPMILS 61.5.1G PRINTING 3. 126535 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1.926.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES r 126536 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CORP $73.96 LAB SUPPLIES 128537 REWES ENGINEERING CO 59.868.75 HARDWARE t7 , 128530 RICH COLOR LAO 529.63 PRINTING N 128539 ROCKWELL ENGINLERING 6 EWUIF $1,452.60 MACHINE PARTS 126540 RODNEY-HUNT CO $3,733.54 BAR SCREEN PARTS -y O 128541 ROSEMOUNT INC. S%29.69 ELECTRIC PARTS L28542 RYAN-NERCO 61.W00.13 ELECTRIC METER 128543 SAFEIV-KLEEN CORP 52.653.61 PARTS CLEANER N 128511 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 31..32.66 PLUNGING SUPPLIES 128545 SANWA WAWK 543.912.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30 128546 DOUG SARVIS 51.125.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 0 128547 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT-L 531:.6SB.55 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 128548 SLIMED A CORP $156.50 LAB SUPPLIES 128549 SCO77 SPECIALTY GASES INC 6733.7V SAFETY SUPPLIES 128550 SEA COAST DESIGNS 41.b L9.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128551 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $723.06 LAB SUPPLIES 128552 SHASTA ELECTRIC SIC.5/3.60 OFFICE EQUIPMENT • 128553 SHURELUCK SALES 62.143.12 HARDWARE 128554 SILVERS INSTRUMENTATION 6347.50 LAB SUPPLIES 128555 SIGMA CHEMICAL CU $269.09 LAB SUPPLIES 128556 SKYPARA WALK-IN MEDICAL ELI $464.66 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 128557 SLIDE MASTER $77.50 PRESENTATION AIDS '12BSSB SMITH PIPE A SUPPLY INC 6i75.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES - 128559 $0 COAST RIK QUALITY $15.056.40 PERMIT FEES A FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/4./93 PAGE 6 0 y REPORT NUNbER AP93 _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF'y OANGC COUNTY CLAIMS FA10 43/1 G/93 POSTING DATE 63/16/93 WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT ULSCR1P710N 126560 SCAGMD UPOATL TRAINING S1GS.U. TRAINING REGISTRATION 126561 SOUTHERN CALIF CUISON CO F25.696.82 POWER 128562 SO CAL GAS CO 340.60A.67 NATURAL GAS 128563 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO 41.314.86 DIESEL FUEL 120564 SOUVENIR PHO70 $19.55 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 128565 SPARKLETTS OPINKIN4 U47ER st.h DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 128566 SPARLINb INSTRUMENT CO INC 42.9b9.15 METER y 128567 STAMEN 2 SPASSOFF FL i5.95G.UO ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-162 C1 128566 WESTALLOY INC $1,043.35 HARDWARE m 126569 SPEAKER SUPPORT $72.73 PRESENTATION AIDS Z 128570 EPEE INOU5TRIES INC $579.39 LAB SUPPLIES - C7 128571 SRECO FLExIBLE S484.96 TRUCK PARTS n 128573 BT ANC0S5 VACUUN SNP YCE $2.072.57 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 128574 JAMCS STAWFI LL CON811UCE ION >1.900.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES fYl 128579 STEAMERS TN EC SCPVICE i000.00 LANDSCAPING 3 _ 12N575 SUMMIT STEEL s984.64 METAL 120576 SUPELCO INC $103.31 LAB SUPPLIES 4E 128517 SUPER CHEM CDRP YL..0 w 19 CHEMICALS OD ' 12 B579 SUPER ICE COMP $82.82 LAB SUPPLIES 128579 TAYLGR-DUNN MFG COMPANY SV20.33 TRUCK PARTS 120580 TECH SYSTEMS 4211.53 TRUCK PARTS D 12B581 CHARLES E THOMAS 4818.21 TRUCK PARTS r 12BSb2 TXON PSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY IL.968.2U r MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 128583 TONY-S LOCK L SAFE SLRVICE 3268.7i KEYS AND LOCKS C7 A 12858E TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL 1179.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES N 128565 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO s7.238.77 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.11-13-91 129586 WESTRONICS i125.9b INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 128587 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $138.60 TRAVEL SERVICES 128568 TRAVLL TRAVEL $143.00 TRAVEL SERVICES - t, 1285B9 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY INC . 31.552.6E TRUCK PARTS s' 128590 JG TUCKER 6 SON INC $2,507.67 INSTRUMENT N ~ 128591 UHLER. INC $102.065.65 CONSTRUCTION 5-32 128592 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $269.06 LAB SUPPLIES d 128593 UNOCAL 3121.52 UNLEADED GASOLINE 128594 UNITED PPRCLL SLRVICE 3V00.30 PARCEL SERVICES 128595 DATAVAULT U S SAFE DEPOSIT CO. i1.405.L: COMPUTER DATA STORAGE 12859E VG/FISIONS INSTRUMENTS 19.299.53 1" EQUIPMENT 128597 VVR SCIENTIFIC $6.979.67 LAB SUPPLIES 128598 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CU $6.676.47 PLUMBING PARTS • 128599 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS sE96.U7 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128600 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $164.29 LAB SUPPLIES 128601 VARNER ACOUSTICS. INC. $1.405.44 BUILDING MATERIALS . 12BEG2 VAUGHAN COMPANY S4.901.25 PUMP PARTS 126603 VEANE'S PLUMBING s210.0C PLUMBING SERVICES 128609 VERTEX SYSTEMS Stl.G31.54 - COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 128645 WA TER POLLUTION CONTROL 319.91 BOOK V FUND NO 9199 - JT DISI WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/C4/93 PAbE 7 REPORT NUN tlER AP43 LUUNTY SANITA71ON DISTRICTS OF URANLC COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 43/14/93 POSTING RAIL 43/16/93 t WARRANT NO. VLNDUR AMOUNT 3ESCRIPTION �! 128606 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEU. 129.69 PUBLICATION .� 128607 WESTERN INDUSTRIAL TLCHNOLOGY 32.1bb.69 MECHANICAL REPAIRS " 128606 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUf PLY 319.962.90 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 128669 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY 3110.42 PUBLICATION 128610 WITL6 $515.76 LAS SUPPLIES 128611 ROURKE 4 G400RUFF f UM $56.152.50 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 120612 XEROX CORP $14.409.39 COPIER LEASES 128613 GEORGE YARDLEY CO 3642.71 VALVES n' _�-' 128614 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $356.7, INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES m 128615 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA COMP 3868.63 CHART PAPER t:1 128616 IILUARTH f ALPER/C.S. ALLEN $16,096.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 n ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS FALB O3/10/93 33.073.814.9b # SUMMARY AMOUNT 00 99 M2 CAP RFAC NFUND ,365.00 E$25,267.00 03 CAP FUND 275,981.36 51 n R3 CAP FAC FUND i2$1,026.94 - f— R5 OPER FUND 82,068.05 45 CAPOPEN FAC FUND f$4,029.03 07 CAP FUND 36,066.89 Cn 07 CAP PAC FUND f36$821.30 411 OPEN FUND $328.00 414 CAP FAC FUND f$66.00 f14 OPEN FUND 863.00 414 'CAP FAC FUND ,079.98 (n 4586 CAP POND 19,041.95 4566 CAP FAC FUND f$2,303.10 ' 4E67 OPEN FUND $7,747.69 47814 OPEN FUND 77,446.08 JT OPEN FUND ,421,117.07 -' C'ORF E1,921,117.67 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $1,988.14 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $179,797.23 a $3,073,814.97 V CO FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST MURKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 1 r. �. REPORT NUMBER AP43 1� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 PUSTING DATE 03/24/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 128651 AG TECH COMPANY $137.149.9. RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 ..__ 128652_- A T L T 13.820.73 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 126653 ACLU-LABS RESEARCH INC $150.00 LAS SERVICES 128654 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES 5424.64 CHILLER REPAIRS 128655 AIR PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL IN 334.bb4." O&M AGREEMENT OKY. GEN. SYST M.O.8-9-85 128656 ALLIED SUFPLY CO $1,258.15 VALVE r 128657 AMBER STEEL 'COMPANY S&U.00 PLAN 6 SPECS BEFORE) 12865E _ AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE CULLLLIN $99.75 LAB SUPPLIES G� 128659 AMENSHAM CORP $326.70 LAB SUPPLIES m 128660 ANAHEIM SEDER CONSTRUCTION 166J.OL EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS - DIST 7 129661 ANIATCR - DISTRIBUTION $426.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES y 120662 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL 4230.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128663 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 1374.79 NOTICES A ADS 128669 APPLIED tl105YSTEXS INC 34.649.73 LAB SUPPLIES _ m _ 128665 ACE UPPLIED COMPUTCR SOLUTION $145.60 CUMPUTER SUPPLIES 3 128666 ABC LABORATORIES $1,395.00 LAB SUPPLIES 128667 _ ARATEA SERVICES INC 12.56 UNIFORM SERVICE 12866E AMENS INDUSTRIES INC $3,643.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 128669 ARI20NA INSTRUMENT i2.691.31 INSTRUMENT I _ 128670 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC $450.U4 HASTE HAULING FEE 128671 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. 4136.00 MASTS OIL REMOVAL - - - r 10. 228672 AMSA $12,803.00 MEMBERSHIP DUBS M.O.1-13-92. 128673 ATLHISON TOFEKA 6 SANTA FL MR 3150.O0 SUPPLY AGREEMENT -- 128674-- AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSIN6 $7.553.25 PAYROLL PROCESSING SERVICES [7 , . 129675 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC S518.29 TRUCK PARTS (lf 128676 BRA LANDFILL $2,766.46 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 128677 BRN SAFETY 6 SUPPLY 447.05 SAFETY SUPPLIER ' 128678 BANANA BLUEPRINT $15,465.79 BLUSPRINTING SERVICES 129679 BANK GF AMERICA $1.203.67 DEFERRED COMP TRANSFER (1 128680 BARCLAYS LAN PUBLISHERS $177.20 PUBLICATION - - N 128661 B BATEMAN Sb75.UO DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128683 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $190.64 BATTERCMPFUGI88 128684 - BAUER COMPRESSOR 4TI 1190.64 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS 12B68S BEATER PAYING INC. INC 47.412.66 LAB SUPPLIES Y- — 198669 _ _ BEACH PAVING INC. $19.347.38 PAVING PLRVIC69 128687 BELL SE INSTRUMENTS 49.39T.]0 LAB SUPPLIES 128688 BELL SECURITY SS1161.07 TEMPORARY SECURITY 88RVIC88 12868E 810-PAL LABORATORIES $550.00 LAB SUPPTRAINING IES REGISTRATION - 128690 BIONECLAN ATION SYMPOSIUM 1550.00 TRAINING RBGISTIIATION ��• 128691 BORNE XA NN PUMPS, INC PUMPS3$5,099.35 EGIN ____128691 BOYLE -FIEDLERINO CUSP 45$212.67 ENGINEERING 88RVIC88 7-19 128693 BRENNER-F TELLER 6 ASSOC IN ,026.59 ILECTRICNT RUPPLIEB 128694 BRIINIAUT LLECTR IL $2,272.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS _ __ 128694 _ BROWN AUTOMATION L2$201.00 INRTRUMBNT PARTS L -128696 BUILDER-S ENGINEERING $774.73 MARDNARK/LUMARR 128696 BURKE ENOINEEPIN6 CO Y714.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS n FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3118/93 PAGE 2 N REPORT NUMBER AP43 _ ...... _..._ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAIR u3/14/93 POSTING DATE u3/E4/93 VAh WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DCSCRIPIION 11 L� 128697 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC 312r19 B.uJ SURVEY SERVICES RBS 5-051 128690 BUSINESS LAGS INC $53.00 BOON 128699 GARY 6 STREED $2.356.84 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT i •� 126700 CPC PRESS INC $87.45 BOOKS 128101 CS COMPANY $4.248.10 VALVE 128702 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC Sb84.65 TRUCK PARTS ` 10 128703 CALIF SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL 185.V6 MEMBERSHIP DUES 1287G4 CARLETON ENGINEERS $11,326.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES m 128705 CENTURY SAFETY INST 8 SUPP l2.651.85 SAFETY SUPPLIES Fri 128706 CHURCH ENGINEERING INC $5.109.82 ENGINERRING SERVICES 2-9-RI 128707 COLE-PARNER INSTRUMENT CO 4344.53 LAB SUPPLIES C7 128708 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS Of CA *"078.5u MECHANICAL PARTS D 124709 COMPUSA. INC. $987.85 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 128710 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIV 3120.38 TRUCK PARTS —I 120711 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 412.025.29 ELECTRIC PARTS 3 128712 CONTINENTAL AIR IDOLS INC $5.346.39 TOOLS 128713 CONTROL CABLES INC $196.b7 TRUCK PARTS 7t 128714 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $5,740.63 CONSULTING SERVICES 00 128715 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS ilr[71.30 TRUCK PARTS 12B 716 CR TSTAL CLEAR MIND ON MAINT. $2,250.00 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES _ 128727 CAL POLY KELLOGG UNIT $215.50 TRAINING REGISTRATION y 228719 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL 46.72 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEES T— 128719 DAILY PILOT 34D.U0 NOTICES 6 ADS r 128720 J.Y. DIANGELO CO INC $7.515.57 PIPE C7 M 128721 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.U& RENTAL EQUIPMENT 228722 DEAVER MANUFACTURIN4 CO. $19.64 TRUCK PARTS Cn •• 128T23 DELTA TECH SERVICE INC 314.008.b5 HIGH VOLUME OIL FLUSH IN 229724 DEZURIH AND/OR CS CO $11,290.35 VALVE 128725 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATLS $2,395.56 PRINTING .y 128726 - DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 39.953.60 9ERVICE AGREEMENT —�j A 126727 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN $1074.51 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL Cn 12Bi28 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $11.582.99 PLANT MAINTENANCE 8 REPAIRS 198729- - ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC - $20.000.00 INSURANCE DEPOSIT � .. 120730 DOWN EDWARDS CORF $767.72 PAINT SUPPLIES _126731 EASTMAN INC $4.659.G8 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12$732 ECOANALYSIS INC $5.081.09 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 128733 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES $3r680.00 SNGINEERING SERVICES - ELECTRICAL 128134 EMED $67.5b SAFETY SUPPLIES 128735 - ENCHANTER INC 45.140.00 OCEAN MONITORING 6-10-92 ) 128736 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC $862.00 LAB SERVICES 128737 MARSHALL FAIRRES 3128.Ca DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 12813B FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 15r2DO.60 RESIDUAL$ REMOVAL H.O.10-9-91 128739 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP 4485.75 AIR FREIGHT 128740 FERRELLGAS $122.56 PROPANE 128741 FISCH ER 6 PORTER CO $6,782.68 CHLORINATION PARTS 128742 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 1.7.635.45 LAB SUPPLIES to N t I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE 3/18193 PAGE 3 REPORT !� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY NUMBER AP91 CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTIN4 DATL 63/24/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT UESLRIPTION n 120743 FISONS INSTRUMENTS S124.64 LAB SUPPLIES _ 128744 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. 5:50.6u CONCRETE CUTTING 128745 _ FLO-SYSTEMS $6,157.46 MRCHANICAL PARTS . ��• 128146 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS 476.05 PUMP PARTS 129747 FLUID TECHNOLOGIES $265.25 OIL TESTING SERVICES 128746 CLIFFORD A FORKERT S6012.25 SURVEYING SERVICE SPEC S-051 129749 FOSS MARITIME CO S1.062.0L JANITORIAL SERVICES 128750 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $299.78 FILM m I28751 - FOUNTAIN VALLEY - PAINT $243.87 PAINT SUPPLIES m rD 128752 BUD FRET 921.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 120753 CITY OF FULLERTON s30.6b WATER USE D � - - - -- 128154 GANAHL LUMBER CO 3101.98 LUMBER/HARDWARE i 228755 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS s6.943.5u PIPE 128756 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $172.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 128751 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO s4.550.65 TELEPHONE SERVICES m 128758 TOM GERLINGER sb.UOO.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 3 128759 N GLANT2 8 SON S24.96 PAINT SUPPLIES 3t 226760 GOV•T FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $355.06 MEMBERSHIP DUES CO L26761 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $233.23 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1 128762 _ GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $5.624.26 FILM r 128763 HSU TECHNOLOGY $152.624.86 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2 a w ... 128764 FRED A HARPER $1,500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION . 128765 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL FLASTI $1,082.46 VALVE r 1 �•( 128766 - HASCO OIL CO INC $147.40 OIL 8 GREASE tj 126767 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS s1.b20.04 CONTAINER RENTALS _ _ 126768 _ PL HAWN CU INC $1.940.36 FILTERS _ N 120769- IPYIN XAYDO CN $135.00 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT ' �'. 128770 HEWLETT PACMARD $1,111.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128771 _ HILTI INC $197.78 TOOLS n 126772 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE - $81.89 TRUCK PARTS _ 126773 HOEKBIGEA CVS CALIF INC s125.87 COMPRESSOR PARTS Cn 12F774 _ RS HUGHES CO INC $1.540.75 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 128775 HUNTER CORPORATION $154.116.89 CONSTRUCTION J-29-1 129776 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA $27.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128777 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCXWINN C $130.14 BICYCLE PARTS 128776 ISC S9.026.50 INSTRUMENTATION CONSULTING 128779 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL S64.717.3C FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 12P 780 INDUSTRIAL THNE AGED PRUDUCTS $95.UI CONNECTORS 126781 INGRAM PAPER $280.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES �. 128782 INTERSTATE BATTCRY SYSTEMS 41.087.3U BATTERIES 128783 JLA CREDIT CORP 3145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 128784 GRLAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP s883.38 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 128785 JAYS CATERING 6393.29 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE _ 126786 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO s910.33 HARDWARE 128T87 JIM•S SUSPENSION SERVICE $50.00 TRUCK REPAIRS yl 128188 KAMAN HEARINGS 6 SUPPLY 492.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES tw W FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 4 REPOhT NUMBER AP43 E .. .. COUNTY CLAI S FAIAl6ON DISTRICTS OF DDATEL COUNTY 3/Z4/9 CLAIMS FA1U 63/24/93 POSTING GATE 43/i4/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT UESCkIPTION #1, ; 120709 KARCHER INSULATION ING $1.900.06 :.` 120790 KEENAN 8 ASSOCIATES $2.475.60 ELECTRIC PARTS 128791 XING BEARING INC $4,452.01 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128792 KNOB 1NUUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $9,413.41 MACHINE SUPPLIES 129793 MARTIN KORDICK SR $2,900.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128794 LA CELLULAk TELEPHONE CO $69.48 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 228795 LEE A NO CONSULTING LN6N 511.306.24 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES - a 126796 KP LINDSTROM INC 54.93i.E0 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5 G•1 128797 SOCO-LYNCH CORP $156.26 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL _ fil128190 MPS $2b1.64 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES tp 120T99 MACDONALD-STEFMENS LAB 511.210.00 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES D 128AOC MACOMCO 5520.65 LAB SERVICES 128801 MARVAC ELECTRUNICS S62.bb SERVICE AGREEMENT 1288G2 _ MATT - CHLOR INC $7.164.32 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ITT 04 - 126803 MCWAIN INSTRUMENTS $41.72 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 3 128804 MICRO MOTION 11.431.27 LAB SUPPLIES 128005 MIDWAY MFS S MACHINING $12.647.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES . 128806 MINE, SAFETY APPLIANCES CO 6,25.5. BUILDING REPAIRS 00 128067 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES 1472.W1 SAFETY SUPPLIES i 128666 JAMES M MONTGOMERY Sl Ui.721.9b MELDING SUPPLIES 128809 JM MONTGOMERY ENGINEERS 33,124.28 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.12-12-90 IF - 126810 TOM MOORE $3.975.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES �.. 128811 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC 91,567.56 CONSULTING SERVICES 126012 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES t$ , 128813 NEWARK ELECTRONICS 5126.bN SAFETY FILM RENTAL y 128814 OCR REPROGRAi NICS INC $121.22 ELECTRIC PARTS 128815 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICLS 5685.44 LAB SUPPLIES A - 126816 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIUk SEE S7.O62.69 SAFETY GLASSES _ 128817 DX SYSTEMS CO Sc991,33.42 OFFICE PARTITIONS C-1 128818 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL 936.72 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91' 128819 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C /344.9h ELECTRIC SUPPLIES _ 128820 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUFPLV C 678.96 TRUCK PARTS w 128821 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. 41,444.27 GROUNDSKESPIHG SUPPLIES 128822 OXYGEN SERVICE 52.611.01 FITTINGS 128823 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 43,612.17 SPECIALTY GASSES 128024 CSODC SELF-FU14UED MEDICAL 1 •260.006.40 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128825 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ST.O67.39 PREMIUM ADVANCE 128826 ROBERT L CITRON 1168.64 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT 126827 - PACIFIC PARTS $3,931da 92/93 PROPERTY TAX 128828 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 9876.03 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES i.. 128829 PACIFIC BELL 651.68 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128830 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIDNING C $68.44 TELEPHONE SERVICES 128831 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $429.19 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 128832 PADRE JANITORIAL SUTV s4N2.72 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 129633 PAGENET 567.5b JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 126834 PAK WEST i547.10 PAGER RENTAL �• JANITORIAL SUPPLIES CA FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WURKING CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE 3118193 PALL 5 L y j •,! REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION OISIOICTS OF ORAN6C COUhTT ' CLAIMS PAID 04/i4/93 POSTIN4 DATE 03/24/93 L/ ! WARRANT N0. YENOUk AMOUNT DESCRIP710N �! 128935 PARKSON CORPORATION $644.51 EQUIPMENT RENTAL _ 128836 PARTS UNLIMITED $1,556.71 TRUCK PARTS 128837 STEVE PELLETIER 6b.50b.U4 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL . 0.1 198636 RUT PENUER4RAFT 4460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128839 PERKIN-ELKLK CORPORATION 45.469.53 LAB SUPPLIES 128840 PIMA 6Rb SYSTEMS INC 6295.885.44 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 r 126841 PLAINS TRULVALUE HARDWARE $69.80 HARDWARE y _ _ 128642 POLTPURE INC 628.433.b5 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-I1-92 m - 128843 PORVENE ROLL-A-DOOR 6127.06 ELECTRIC PARTS m a 126644 POWER ELEC7040 SUPPLY LO 4136.39 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES z 128045 PRECISION INDUSTRIES 4401.22 HARDWARE 128046 - PRESENTATION PNOOUCTS SVGA." OFFICE SUPPLIES n + 128847 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 684.06 ICE 128648 THE FROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $3.100.66 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 m 128849 STEVE P. RADOS. INC. $103.804.00 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-IA-2 128B50 RED WING SHOES 662b.77 SAFETY SHOES 128851 REOI EXPRESS $92.95 MESSENGER SERVICES 00 128052 THE REb1STER 61.357.26 NOTICES A ADS 126853 REMUTE METER RLSLITING SYSI 55.400.60 POSTAGE i 220854 COMMUN17Y BUSINESS GRAPHICS 6112.36 PRINTING 128855 MCJUNKIN-REPUWLIC SUPPLY 64.061.2C PLUMBING SUPPLIES 128656 ROBBINS SCIENTIFIC $3,019.05 LAB EQUIPMENT r I 129857 J R ROBERTS CORP 5135.270.38 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1 f 120850 ROSEMOUNT INC. 9949.84 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES f7 , 128859 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL $1.167.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 128860 ARNOLD S RDNNELSBUR6. C.L. $2.183.7, ENGINEERING SERVICES 128861 PEGGY WILCOX 4540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION . • 12PS62 RUSSELL-S COAST. CO. $300.00 CONSTRUCTION 12R863 JOSEPH T RYERSON 6 SUN IN $629.46 STEEL 128064 SAC WEST 5977.56 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128865 SAFETY YLST $299.32 SAFETY SUPPLIES 126066 SANCTI DIAGNOSTICS PASTEUR $458.70 LAB SUPPLIES 128867 SANTA FF BAG CO $242.4. BUILDING SUPPLIES 12886E SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $765.03 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 228869 SEA COAST OESIb NS 5412.57 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 128870 SHURELUCK SALES $7.026.26 HARDWARE 128671 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION $102.74 LAB SUPPLIES 128872 S16MA CHEMICAL CO 5345.Jb LAB SUPPLIES 126673 SKVPAMK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI $2,923.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL SEAMS 128674 SMITH PIPE 6 SUPPLY INC $37.88 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 129475 SO COAST AIR 8UAL17V $5,597.00 PERMIT F8E8 128876 SO CALIF COASTAL WATER 5.95.558.OG SCCMRP M.0.5-8-91 128877 SOUTHERN CALIF 'EDISON CO 5201.6b0.41 POWER _ 126B7B $O CAL GAS CO 52.378.23 NATURAL GAS �.. 128679 SO CALIF WATER CO $36.96 WATER USE 128900 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL Cb $5.170.48 DIESEL/UNLEADED-PIIEL fA FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WURMINW CAPITAL PROCLSSING DAIS 3/18193 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP44 _ LOUNTV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY T \I�rl CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATL 43/24/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 11 'i 128861 SPARKLETTS DRINKING UATEK s1.871.5G DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 428682 .. VESTALLOY INC $179.78 STEEL 128883 SPEAKER SUPPORT $64.65 PRESENTATION AIDS ' • 128884 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCE SYS 43.G24.14 TRAINING REGISTMTION 12B885 STERLING ART 440.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128686 STEVENS PUBLISHING CORP 6s99.44 SUBSCRIPTION 120887 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO $88.43 TOOLS n _ 128088 TCH ASSOCIATES il.VGfi.69 LAB SUPPLIES m 128889 TAYLUR-OUNN MIS - COMPANY 5213.c1 ELECTRIC CART PARTS f7l 128890 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $69.48 HARDWARE Z 128891 TRANSHATION INC s323.03 PUMP PARTS C7 128892 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES s455.0U TRAVEL SERVICES n 128897 TRAVEL TRAVEL s461.46 TRAVEL SERVICES 226994 _ TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY INC 3164.11 TRUCK PARTS rn ^i... 128895 JG TUCKER 8 SON INC 1.37.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS 3 128896 TUSTIN DODGE $23.45 TRUCK PARTS Z�k V 228897 TWINING LABORATORIES 01 31.728.00 LAB SERVICES 12889E UNITED INDUSTRIAL TIME $412.91 TRUCK PARTS 128899 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $209.81 PARCEL SERVICES 128900 _ VWR SCIENTIFIC 55.394.11 LAB SUPPLIES ' 126901 VALIN CORPORATION s1.591.71 FILTER 3> 128942 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO S1.1TB.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES r 128903 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS 141.49 PRINTING 1 1289C4 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS s293.58 LAB SUPPLIES C7 04 128905 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $13.650.29 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 N 128906 VESTAUX INTERNATIONAL sbtl.7b TRUCK PARTS 128907 WHESSOE VAREC sli6.94 FREIGHT �•' 128900 VILLDAN ASSOCIATES 521.352.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-31 _ 128909__ ROURKE 6 WOODRUFF L OR 599.629.6E LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 128910 AEROX CORP $4,166.65 COPIER LEASES N _ 128911 GEORGE YARDLEY CU $426.95 VALVES 128912 NORMAN E CULVER 4214.45 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION - 126913 RICHARD B EDGAR 4200.UG DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128914 R08LRT H MAIN s116.0B DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ----------------- IF TOTAL CLAIMS PAIL L3/14/93 SL.627.461.02 tz s W {: 5 REPO FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 03/18/93 PAGE 7 REPORT NNBB AP93 - COD SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/29/93 POSTING OATH 03/24/93 N . r SUMMARY AMOUNT n ' ppI OPE R FUND 6.70 qI CAP PAC FUND j58,4 1.00 92 OPER FUND f3,916.94 12 CAP FAC FORD 31,731.68 1 3 OPER FUND 11;197.01 3 CAP PAC FWD $2,183.70 5 OPER FUND 5,726.59 95 CAP FAC FUND $3,024.00 6 OPER FUND f29.51 [1 7 OPBR FUND 4, 79.US M f 7 CAP FAC FUND 6:368.52 Z - III OPER FUND 2,325.20 914 CAP FAC FUND j 5,943.50 n y8ppSEE OPER s s] —� - 3T6OPERPFUND j9)7:4611 7.70 rylCORPii{765,184.02 3 ? SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS 219,122.16 — - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 483_815.16 CO $2,627,461.02 r � c7 1 N ..._ . N j i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA March 23, 1993 ' ,OMIi FLL6 YVEMUF MEMORANDUM w AIN Vn .f FCANM az70e.6127 TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager . FROM: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer SUBJECT. PURCHASE OF ONE STEAM STERILIZER UNIT (AUTOCLAVE) SPECIFICATION NO. E-226 (REVISED) Sealed bids were opened on Tuesday. March 16, 1993. for the purchase of One Steam Sterilizer Unit (Autoclave), Specification No. E-226 (Revised). Tabulation of bids received is as follows: BIDDER BID PRICE 1. Amsco Scientific $27,145.00 Division of American Sterilizer Co. Apex, NC 2. MDT Corporation $27,685.00 Anaheim, CA 3. Consolidated Stills& Sterilizer $36,575.00 Boston , MA 4. Fisher Scientific Company NO-BID Tustin, CA It is recommended the award be made to Amsco Scientific Division of American Sterilizer Company, the lowest responsible bidder, for their proposal bid amount of$27,145.00, plus all applicable sales taxes. Respectfully submitted, 11 K K.Lr uJl1,fY W U.f1�--Ol Katherine Yarosh Senior Buyer //�' W"ra c¢r rg recommendation: Ted Hoffrhan Purchasing Manager A p G .0 ' 41gon Blake P.Wers6n Director of Technical Services ry G. Stree hector of Finance .C. AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS" "C', Page 1 of 6 , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �✓ P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS.. INC. dba C.O. NO.: Four (41 COUCH AND SONS DATE: April 14. 1993 JOB: INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR, JOB NO. 1-9: AND REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL. JOB NO. J-22-2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (9eduetl $ 83,741.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. JOB NO. 1-9: ITEM 1 - EMERGENCY REPAIRS TO EXISTING 84-INCH INTERPLANT PIPELINE The Contractor was directed to make emergency repairs to the existing 84-inch interplant reinforced concrete pipeline south of the Effluent Junction Box (EJB) at Reclamation Plant No. 1. The location of the EJB is at the intersection of Garfield Avenue and the west levee of the Santa Ana River. The first joint of the existing 84inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) just south of EJB had recently settled 3 inches and separated from the junction box, which resulted in a small amount of effluent leaking from the broken joint into the surrounding natural ground below the pipe. Upon investigation it was determined that structural repairs to the RCP were required immediately to maintain the integrity of this main effluent pipeline connecting Reclamation Plant No. 1 with the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (COBS) at Treatment Plant No. 2. The repair of the pipe involved a two step process. The first phase involved stabilizing the ground below the 84inch RCP and future 120-inch RCP by grouting and mudjacking the soils. The mudjacking raised the 84-inch RCP approximately 1-inch. The second phase of the repairs involved excavation and shoring in order to provide access through the south side of the EJB, structural repairs to the 84-inch RCP and installation and removal of an extensive dewatering system to control both ground water and diversion of effluent from the EJB. Structural repairs to the 844nch RCP included removing broken and cracked concrete from around the pipe joint and sandblasting of the joint to provide a clean bonding surface. "D-1" AGENDA ITEM k9(0 - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" Page 2 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS., INC. dba C.O. NO.: Four (41 COUCH AND SONS DATE: April 14. 1993 JOB: INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR. JOB NO. 1-9: AND REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL. JOB NO. J-22-2 Additional structural steel reinforcement was added and the joint was rebuilt with a high strength rheoplastic mortar. The majority of this emergency work was performed during the month of December 1992. During the months of December and January the Contractor experienced several interruptions to the work. These were due to inclement weather and changes in plant operating procedures resulting from preparation to divert flows in case of rain. This item of work was accomplished on a time-and-material basis pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the `... General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #7 and #7A) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 74,536.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - REDUCTION IN RETENTION The amount of retained funds on the project will be reduced from ten percent (10%) of contract work performed to date to a fixed amount of $1,000,000.00 for all future progress payments. The Districts' General Provisions require that ten percent (10%) of each progress payment be retained until final payment, or posting of approved securities as an alternative to retained funds. To date, the contractor has posted $1,719,311.68 through Progress Payment No. 20. The work is about eighty percent (80%) complete. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" Page 3 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS.. INC. dba C.O. NO.: Four (4) COUCH AND SONS DATE: April 14. 1993 JOB: INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR, JOB NO, 1-9: AND REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB NO. J-22-2 ITEM 3 - TIME EXTENSION FOR WEATHER DELAYS The contract provides for 14 days of inclement weather which were satisfied as of February 7, 1992. As of February 24, 1993, the Contractor was delayed 44 calendar days beyond the contract provisions for inclement weather due to rain and wet conditions. On June 10, 1992, under Change Order No. 1, Item No. 3 the Board of Directors approved a time extension of 16 calendar days to the contract for inclement weather. This item for extension of time delay is authorized pursuant to Section 6-4 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days JOB NO. J-22-2: ITEM 4 - SALES TAX ADJUSTMENT The Contract documents for Job No. 1-9 and Job No. J-22-2 specify that bids be based on a sales tax rate of 6.5% for purchased materials. Section 51 of the Contract Specifications allows the Contractor to submit invoices and obtain a sales tax adjustment for an increase in the sales tax rate above 6.5% during the life of the Contract. The sales tax adjustment included in this item is based on material invoices submitted by the Contractor from October 10, 1992 through January 18, 1993 for materials purchased in Orange, Los Angeles and Riverside Counties. The actual sales tax rate under which the materials were purchased is 7.75% for Orange and Riverside Counties and 8.25% for Los Angeles County. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,566.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days / "D-3" AGENDA ITEM k9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3" Page 4 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS., INC. dba C.O. NO.: Four 14) COUCH AND SONS DATE: Aoril 14. 1993 JOB: INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR, JOB NO, 1-9: AND REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB NO. J-22-2 ITEM 5 - CAP NATURAL GAS PIPELINE AT PLANT 2 The Contractor was directed to cut and cap an existing 6-inch natural gas pipeline in the utility tunnel adjacent to the Foster Booster Pump Station at Treatment Plant No. 2. This existing natural gas pipeline was originally cut and capped when the Southern California Gas Company installed a new natural gas service and meter station near the Districts' south property line. New natural gas pipelines were installed from the meter station to serve the plant and provide increased capacity for the new cogeneration facility. Upon proceeding with excavation for the new 120-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) ocean outfall, the existing gas pipeline was found to be in conflict. The Contractor was then directed to remove interfering portions of the gas pipeline and continue excavation for the new 120-inch RCP. This required purging the pipe and welding a new permanent steel cap on the existing 6-inch gas pipeline a second time in a location beyond the alignment of the new 120-inch ocean outfall pipeline. This item of work was accomplished on a time-and-material basis pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #10) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 639.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 83,741.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 14 Calendar Days "D-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-4" Page 5 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �r+� P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS.. INC. dba C.O. NO.: Four (4) COUCH AND SONS DATE: Aoril 14, 1993 JOB: INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR. JOB NO. 1-9: AND REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB NO J-22-2 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that 14 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date September 11, 1991 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date May 2, 1993 Time Extension this Change Order 14 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 37 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 637 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date June 8, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 21,328,600.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 240,925.00 This Change (Add) l9edde;) $ 83,741.00 Amended Contract Price $ 21 ,653,266.00 "D-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(0 - ALL DISTRICTS "D-5" Page 6 of 6 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS.. INC. dba C.O. NO.: Four (4) COUCH AND SONS DATE: April 14. 1993 JOB: INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR. JOB NO. 1-9: AND REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB NO. J-22-2 Board Authorization Date: April 14, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: iG,rco r 8�3 �- 3-8-9j ngineed Cdnstructlon Manager Date APPROVED BY: APPROV ED AS TO FORM: a., /,,v Lb `� `jJ� Director of Engineering Date Gene I Counsel Date COUCH BROS., INC., dba COUCH AND SONS ACCEPTED BY: -8-°13 ontractor Date (1-9\C0.4) AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-6" Page 1 of 8 , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty (20) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: April 14, 1993 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Bedwet) $ 53,586.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - NATURAL GAS FILTERS FOR ENGINES This item is for providing one five-micron gas filtering station for each of the three gas driven engines in the Central Power Generation Facility. These filters are not required in the contract documents but are recommended by the engine manufacturer, Cooper Industries, for engine protection in Cooper Energy Service Engineering Standard SC-9-2. The Districts' Engine Expert, Advanced Engine Technologies Corporation, recommended that these natural gas filters should be installed to insure the engine manufacturer will honor all warranties and maintenance agreements specified in Job No. J-19A, Electrical Equipment Purchase Contract for Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for use in Central Power Generation System. Each filter station includes a 5-micron filter, two 3-inch isolation valves, one local differential pressure indicator, and low point drains with associated piping. Painting will be accomplished on a future field change order. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO - 021) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 14,519.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" Page 2 of 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty (20) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: April 14, 1993 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 . JOB NO J-19-1 ITEM 2 - REDUCTION OF RETENTION This item is for reduction of project retention as work is completed. Retention will be reduced in accordance with the following schedule as the items are completed: Work Item: Maximum Retention Reduction A) Complete installation of civil, structural, mechanical, electrical and controls work $267,000.00 B) Full Load Test - Engine-Generator No. One $ 80,000.00 C) Full Load Test - Engine-Generator No. Two $ 70,000.00 D) Full Load Test - Engine-Generator No. Three $ 52,000.00 E) Seven-Day Operational Test, Punch List $101,000.00 F) Spare Parts, 0&M Manuals $ 93,000.00 G) As-Builts Drawings, Interconnection Diagrams $102,000.00 H) Training, Change Order Work $ 5,543.00 This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3 - LOAD BANK SHELTER This item is for providing a temporary shelter for electrical load banks required for load testing of engine-generator sets. The load banks must be located outside and require protection from rain. The shelter is required to avoid weather delays while load testing. The work includes erection, maintenance for three months, and removal of the structure. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO J191-030) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,912.00 `...i TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" Page 3 of 8 , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �..✓ P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty (20) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: April 14, 1923 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-19-1 ITEM 4 - ADDITIONAL SIGNS This item is for four additional Type Vill ear protection signs, two additional Type IX high temperature warning signs, and ten additional Type V No Smoking signs. Work includes signs, mounting hardware and labor in accordance with Detailed Specification 60-0800. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. (Reference: RFI J191-272) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 609.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5 - CHILLER CONTROL WIRING This item is for conduit and raceway required to complete the absorption chiller control conduit and wiring. Work included revisions to raceway and cable routed from the chillers to the motor control centers and additional wiring between equipment manufacturer control devices. Credit for raceway and cable shown in the contract documents but not required is included. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH J191-067) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 3,290.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" Page 4 of 8 \J COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty (20) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: April 14. 1993 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1 ITEM 6 - CHEMICAL TREATMENT OF ENGINE SUPPORT SYSTEMS This item is for chemical treatment of water in each engine jacket water system, heat recovery units, steam condensate system, boiler feedwater system, hot water system and chilled water system to prevent scaling and corrosion inside the piping and equipment. Work includes labor and materials to provide treatment of water in accordance with the approved chemical treatment company recommendations. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-61b)1 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 6,676.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 7 - STEAM AND HEAT RESERVOIR SYSTEM CONNECTIONS This item is for providing additional labor and materials to tie the steam and heat reservoir piping systems into the existing plant piping systems. Work included in the heat reservoir connection included installation of owner supplied expansion joints, additional fittings, insulation and flushing of existing plant piping. Work included in the steam system connection includes installation of pipe fittings at the south wall of Digesters 5 and 6 control room. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH J191-071) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,679.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-4" AGENDA ITEM#9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4" Page 5 of 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �..✓ P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty (20) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: Aoril 14, 1993 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO J-19-1 ITEM 8 - LUBE OIL FILTER TEST This item is for providing support for the lube oil filter test performed by the engine expert, Advanced Engine Technologies Corporation. Work included providing electrical connection of test pumps, provision of pump starters, installation of equipment controls and wiring, fabrication of steel pipe fittings, and support labor to assemble, run, and disassemble test equipment. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO - 028) �✓ ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 9,842.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 9 - SMOKE DETECTOR WIRING This item is for providing conduit, wiring and fire alarm system control panel modifications required to operate the duct mounted smoke detector located in the HVAC Room on the second floor of the Central Power Generation Facility. The wiring is required to provide interlocking with Air Handling Unit 3 to shut down the fan in the event of a fire. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b) 1 of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH J191-065) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 1,988.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days "E-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-5" Page 6 of 8 V� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty 120) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: April 14. 1993 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1 ITEM 10 - CONTROL POWER FOR LOADING CONTROL DEVICES This item is for providing 120 VAC control power for the automatic governor loading controls located in the medium voltage switchgear. This work is required to operate the loading controls which are needed for parallel operation of the generators. This item does not include cost to revise the Medium Voltage Switchgear Operations and Maintenance Manuals. These costs will be negotiated later when other revisions to the medium voltage switchgear are complete. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO - 029) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 449.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 11 - MODIFY 12 KV ELECTRICAL CONDUITS This item is for removing and correctly rerouting conduits for circuits 5-31 and 5-32 previously installed in accordance with Contract Drawing 1E22. The existing raceways at Tunnel Intersection H for these circuits are incorrectly shown in the contract drawings. This item also includes additional conduit for control wiring to the medium voltage switchgear located in the Electric Service Center. This item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO - 027) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 7,342.00 ..J TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "E-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-6" Page 7 of 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA- 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty (201 CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: April 14. 1993 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 . JOB NO. J-19-1 ITEM 12 - RELOCATE 12 KV ELECTRICAL PULL BOX This item is for work involved in relocating the 12 KV electrical pull box located in the basement of the Central Power Generation Facility into Intersection I of Tunnel Number 6. Conflicts with adjacent piping systems inside the basement rendered use of the electrical pull box impractical. The pull box was moved into the tunnel intersection where more access is available. Cost includes fifty percent (50%) of labor and materials required to move the box. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,280.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 53,586.00 �✓ TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 21, 1991 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date October 12, 1992 Time Extension this Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 268 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 868 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date July 7, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable "E-7" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-7" Page 8 of 8 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. Twenty (20) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: April 14, 1993 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1 Original Contract Price $ 15,410,855.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1,201 ,502.00 This Change (Add) (9e4ft*) $ 53,586.00 Amended Contract Price $ 16,665,943.00 Board Authorization Date: April 14, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: p- ti 3-8-, gineering Manager Date 01onstruction Manager Date APPR ED7BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ?�• �/ 13 3 Director of Engineering ate Gener C6unsel F Date HUNTER CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: 1 3-8-9j Contractor V Date "E-8" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-8" e ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS e+ >> ^gp jam@ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 p4^4ce cW (714)962-2411 ��✓ March 9, 1993 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill in Connection with Expansion of Existing Computer Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with CH2M Hill for the preparation of a project report, design, construction plans and specifications and construction support services in connection with Expansion of Existing Computer Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $690,148.00. Engineering Services, 1 i direct labor at hourly rates �•✓ plus overhead at 173%), not to exceed $319,088.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 36,000.00 Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 292,575.00 Fixed Profit 42,485.00 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed S690.148.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. s/William Mahoney Is/Evelyn Hart William Mahoney Evelyn Hart Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee Is/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee 1 / "F" AGENDA ITEM #9(9)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F" RESOLUTION NO. 93-37 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CH2M HILL FOR DESIGN AND PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR JOB NO. J-31 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CH2M HILL FOR DESIGN AND PROGRAMMING SERVICES REQUIRED FOR EXPANSION OF EXISTING COMPUTERIZED MONITORING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AT PLANTS 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-31 WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been negotiated with CH2M Hill for design and programming services required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on January 13, 1993, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" Section 1. That the proposed Professional Services Agreement is for a project which is a portion of the previously- approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be designed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15163 of the Districts' Guidelines, a Final Program Environmental Impact Report on the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989; and, Section 2 . That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated April 14 , 1993 , by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for Districts Nos. 2 , 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and CH2M Hill for design and planning services required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2 . That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Services at hourly rates for labor, plus overhead at 173%, not to exceed $319, 088. 00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 36, 000. 00 Subconsultant fees, not to exceed 292, 575. 00 Fixed Profit 42 ,485. 00 TOTAL, not to exceed 469D. 148. 00 "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" 4/ Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1993. J GJAJ.OV �J "G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(9)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 _ ° yv 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92108-7018 (714)962-2411 March 9, 1993 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for Preparation of Project Report, Design and Construction Support Services in Connection with Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with John Carollo Engineers for the preparation of the project report in connection whh Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $950,252.00. The design, construction plans and specifications and construction support services portions will be negotiated separately. Engineering Services, �a•✓ direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 162%1, not to exceed $821,602.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 21,750.00 Fixed Profit 106,900.00 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $950,252.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. s/William Mahoney Is/Evelyn Hart William Mahoney Evelyn Hart Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee t / "H" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "H" RESOLUTION NO. 93-38 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR JOB NO. J-33 AND JOB NO. J-34 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS TO PREPARE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR STANDBY POWER RELIABILITY MODIFICATIONS, JOB NO. J-33 , AND OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES, JOB NO. J-34 WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been negotiated with John Carollo Engineers to prepare plans and specifications and to provide construction support services for Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on January 13, 1993, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2 , 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS " I-1" Section 1. That the proposed Professional Services Agreement is for a project which is a portion of the previously- approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be designed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15163 of the Districts' Guidelines, a Final Program Environmental Impact Report on the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Districts' Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989; and, Section 2. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated April 14, 1993, by and between County Sanitation District No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for l I Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and John Carollo Engineers to prepare plans and specifications and to provide construction support services for Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Services at hourly rates for labor, plus overhead at 162%, not to exceed $921,602.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 21,750.00 Fixed Profit 106,900.00 TOTAL, not to exceed 9950.252.00 1 / "I-2 AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2"•✓ Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. _ PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1993. RAGW.038 "I-Y AGENDA ITEM N9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-3" °'�1�r°�°'• COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA V.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 a4 10944 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 921084018 •4'°ce coin (714)962-2411 March 23, 1993 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies in Connection with Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Mains (First and Second Units), and New Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 3-36R In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with The Keith Companies for the preparation of a project report, design, construction plans and specifications and construction support services in connection with Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Mains (First and Second Units), and New Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 3-36R, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $85,683.00. Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 150%), not to exceed $70,507.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 2,500.00 Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 1,500.00 Fixed Profit 11,176.00 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed 595.683.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/Sal A. Saoien is/Burnie Dunlap Sal A. Sapien, Chairman Burnie Dunlap, Chairman Pro Tem District No. 3 District No. 3 Selection Committee Selection Committee Is/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "in AGENDA ITEM #90 ) (1) - DISTRICT 3 Hill • RESOLUTION NO. 93-44-3 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE KEITH COMPANIES FOR DESIGN OF CONTRACT NO. 3-36R A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE KEITH COMPANIES FOR DESIGN OF REPLACEMENT OF WESTMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAINS (FIRST AND SECOND UNITS) , AND NEW WESTSIDE PUMP STATION FORCE MAIN, CONTRACT NO. 3-36R WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been negotiated with The Keith Companies for design of Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Mains (First and Second Units) , and New Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 3-36R; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on September 11, 1991, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated April 14, 1993, by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 and The Keith Companies to design Replacement of "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "K-1" Westminster Avenue Force Mains (First and Second Units) , and New Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 3-36R, is hereby approved and accepted; and, �•✓ Section 2 . That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Services at hourly rates for labor, plus overhead at 150%, not to exceed $70,507.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 2,500. 00 Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 1,500. 00 Fixed Profit 11, 176. 00 TOTAL, not to exceed 585. 683 . 00 Section 3 . That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 3 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1993. R4G/BD.O44 "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(j ) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "K-2" \� RESOLUTION NO. 93-40 DESIGNATING A DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND THE ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER/TAX COLLECTOR TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 73-18 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING A DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TREASURER/TAX COLLECTOR TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 73-18 x xxxxxxxx*xxxxxx*xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, \� DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That is hereby appointed as Treasurer of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California. Section 2: The authority of the Boards of Directors to invest or reinvest Districts' surplus funds or to sell or exchange securities so purchased or to deposit for safekeeping the funds and investments of the Districts with depositories as provided for in California Government Code Sections 53608 and 53630, is hereby delegated to the Districts' Treasurer, as authorized by California Government Code Section 53607. "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(b)(2)(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" Section 3: The Districts' Treasurer is authorized to direct that the Districts' surplus funds or any portion thereof be deposited into the care, custody and control of the Treasurer/Tax Collector of the County of Orange for purposes of investment or reinvestment, pursuant to California Government Code Section 53684. Section 4: That the Treasurer/Tax Collector of the County of Orange (County Treasurer) be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to invest or to reinvest all funds belonging to the Districts, which have been transferred to the County Treasurer, in those instruments as authorized by California Government Code Section 53601 and/or in deposits with depositories, as authorized by California Government Code Section 53635. The County Treasurer is further authorized and directed to sell or exchange securities so purchased and to terminate or renew deposits so made. Each of these authorizations is to continue until the further order of the Boards of Directors of the Districts or the Districts' Treasurer. Section 5: That these investments, deposits, sales of investments, termination or renewal of deposits, are to be made by the Districts' Treasurer and Treasurer/Tax Collector of the County of Orange only after consultation with and direction by the General Manager of the Districts or his designee. "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (2) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" `,l section 6: That the Districts' Treasurer and Treasurer/Tax Collector of the County of Orange, upon confirmation by the General Manager of the Districts, are hereby authorized and directed to prepare such records of account as are necessary to effect the transfer of funds required to make the indicated investments. Section 7: In the event of the temporary absence of the Districts' Treasurer, the Districts' General Manager is hereby delegated the authority to appoint an Acting Treasurer to carry out the powers and duties of the office of the Districts' Treasurer. Section 8: Resolution No. 73-18 is hereby repealed. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1993. FAU63.ao "L-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (2)(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-3" RESOLUTION NO. 93-41 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFICATION NO. M-044 1 / A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR OFFICE TRAILER RELOCATION AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2, SPECIFICATION NO. M-044 x xxxxxxxxxx++++++xx+xxxx++xx+xxx++ WHEREAS, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of the plans and specifications for Office Trailer Relocation at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, the Districts have concurrently undertaken an environmental review of the proposed project and hereby determine that said project is categorically exempt from further CEQA requirements; and, Section 2. That the project for Office Trailer Relocation at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, is hereby approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and, Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (1) ALL DISTRICTS "M-1" by the above-referenced Districts, engineers, for Office Trailer Relocation at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and, Section 5. That the General Manager be authorized to establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1993. «cu.an "M-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-42 AWARDING JOB NO. P2-42-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-42-2 x xxxxxx+++++xxxxxx+++++++xxxxxxxxx The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which is a portion of the previously-approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, �J the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989; and, Section 2 . That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Margate Construction, Inc. for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1" Section 3. That the contract for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, be awarded to Margate Construction, Inc. , in the total amount of $14,496,000.00 in `. accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1993. \� rc3ei.042 "N-2<' AGENDA ITEM #14(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS March 16, 1993 of ORANGE COUNrt, CAUFORNIA 11:00 a.m. 3 Addenda Isar Euis AVEBUE Go Box OV i WWN V1 .fJLIFONHIG BE)E n+n Bez-zn+ BID TABULATION Job No. P2-42-2 PROJECT TITLE: Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Secondary clarifier extension: new flight and chain: new 55-foot DAF and miscellaneous nipino ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $22.000.000 BUDGET AMOUNT: $22.35O.00O - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1. Margate Construction, Inc., Carson, CA $14,496,000.00 2. Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper Construction Co., (a Joint Venture), Inc., Huntington Beach, CA $14,990,000.00 3. Hunter Corporation, Carlsbad, CA $15,004,781.00 4. Advanco Constructors, Div. of Zurn Constructors, Inc. Upland, CA $15,296,800.00 5. Steve P. Rados, Inc., Santa Ana, CA $16,187,000.00 6. Kiewit Pacific Co., Santa Fe Springs, CA $16,517,131.00 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Margate Construction, Inc. in the bid amount of $14,496,000.00 as the lowest and best bid. e /1 M. Dawes Director of Engineering �a✓ "N-3" AGENDA ITEM #14(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-3" • RESOLUTION NO. 93-43 AWARDING JOB NO. P2-43-1 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PRIORITY PROJECTS ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-43-1 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which is a portion of the previously-approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of \J 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, "0-1" AGENDA ITEM #15(d) - ALL DISTRICTS 110-11, Section 3. That the contract for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, be awarded to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount of $3,398,000.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1993. .v rc7aj.Of3 "0-2" AGENDA ITEM #15(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS March 23, 1993 of OMNGE COUNTY. GUFOIINIA 11:00 a.m. 2 Addenda 1 e EWSAVUJUE n.c.eos e1n BID TABULATION ^"° vu`a`.MLw °'z'1e'a'°' n1u19s2x11 Job No. P2-43-1 PROJECT TITLE: Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construct miscellaneous improvements to facilities throughout Plant No. 2 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $4.800.O00 BUDGET AMOUNT: $7.000.000 TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID 1. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, Ontario, CA $3,398,000 2. Ziebarth & Alper and C. S. Alper Construction Co., Inc., a Joint Venture, Huntington Beach, CA $3,625,777 3. Christeve Corp., Arcadia, CA $3,635,500 `.a 4. Advanco Constructors, Div. of Zurn Constructors, Inc. Upland, CA $3,676,197 5. Margate Construction, Inc., Carson, CA $3,690,10O 6. Schuler Engineering, Riverside, CA - $3,803,640 7. S. J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc., Santa Ana, CA $4,061,000 8. Amelco Industries, Gardena, CA $4,133,600 9. JW Contracting Corporation, Riverside, CA $4,251,500 10. Scott Co. of California, Gardena, CA $4,482,725 1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers in the bid amount of $53,398,000 as the lowest and best bid. -�t6U� Thomas M. awes Director of Engineering "0-3" AGENDA ITEM #15(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS, W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA IWAA EO.B AVENUE April 7, 1993 R.o.go.212, FMWNN VALLEY.CAUFORNN 9272F p1.1282,E411 ,. J STAFF REPORT Reauest for Consideration of Reduced Connection Fees for Park Stanton Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton The District has received the attached communications from Jan Development Co., and Director Sal Sapien, Chairman of Sanitation District No. 3, requesting consideration of a reduction in connection fees for a large Senior Citizen Apartment Project within the City of Stanton. The project includes 335 affordable senior citizen apartments located on Katella Avenue, just west of Beach Boulevard. Chairman Sapien points out that this is a much needed project to serve the senior population. The units range from 450 square feet to 750 square feet plus common areas. Under the Districts' ordinance, the connection fee would be $2,350 per unit or $787,250 for the project. The City of Stanton would receive five percent of this amount, $39,362.50, which is the standard provision for all cities for administering the District's connection fee ordinance. The District has two connection fee rates. The $2,350 residential development fee applies to dwelling units. Non-residential development is charged a fee of $470 per thousand square feet (minimum $2,350l. The square footage area fees are used on industrial and commercial facilities which generally have lower sewage flows per thousand square feet than residential. Connection fees are collected to support the construction of the facilities necessary to serve new development. Those facilities include the large trunk sewers which collect sewage from the cities and convey it to the treatment plants, the treatment works, and facilities for the disposal of sewage treatment by-products and disposal of the treated effluent. The current connection fee of $2,350 per unit, which has not been raised for two years, is an important component of the Districts' overall financing program for capital expansion construction. The only other source of funds for facilities improvements is borrowing in the municipal securities market. The $2,350 per unit does not meet the Districts' capital needs; consequently, in recent years, the Districts have issued certificates of participation totaling nearly $400 million for additional funding of sewerage system improvements and replacements. The certificates are repaid by annual property taxes and user charges collected on the property tax bill. "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) - DISTRICT 3 "P-110 Staff Report April 7, 1993 ./ Page Two The issue of totally equitable connection fees is a difficult one with no easy answers. For example, one home may be occupied by a single occupant, while the next door house could have five occupants. It could be argued that the connection fees for the single occupant house, as well as the annual user fee, should be lower; however, the occupancy could change tomorrow. The same is true of a smaller apartment versus a larger apartment. Conversely, an argument can be made that the size of a dwelling is somewhat independent of the amount of flow received by the sewage system. Sewers must be designed and constructed for peak flows. Since these peak flows are somewhat independent of individual sewage discharge, an equal connection fee may be appropriate. The same is true of most of the components of the treatment and disposal facilities which again are designed and constructed for peak conditions. The cost of treating the sewage, however, is very dependent on the amount and strength of the sewage received. This cost is the operations and maintenance expenses, which are not funded through the capital connection fee charge. The operations and maintenance charges are funded largely through the annual user fee 1 ./ and that portion of the one-percent basic property tax levy received by the Districts. Smaller apartments pay less property tax and multiple family dwelling units pay a lower annual user fee than a single family dwelling. Some believe that a senior citizen, a low income senior citizen, or low income units in general should receive a lower connection fee. It may be that such a fee reduction is appropriate and, if the Directors concur, it is recommended that staff be directed to do a study and make recommendations. If a study is undertaken, it would be appropriate to consider certain guidelines. First, since the cities collect our connection fees, and retain a portion thereof, should a request for a fee adjustment be made by the governing board of the agency requesting the connection fee reduction? Should the agency requesting the reduction be required to give up an equivalent portion of the five percent collection fee which they now receive? Should the reduction request be considered on a case-by-case basis or should the entire connection fee schedule be restructed? If restructured, how many different categories should be considered? The Districts' connection fee for any residential project is one of many fees charged. If a request for a lower rate is going to be considered and/or approved, should it be conditional on all fees charged on that development by the agency agreeing to use the same reduction factor? "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) - DISTRICT 3 "P-2" I Staff Report April 7, 1993 Page Three In summary, the issue of totally equitable capital connection fees, annual user fees, and most other fees is most difficult, at best. To the extent practicable, the Districts' fees are based on sound guidelines and principles as well as pragmatic considerations. Reduction in the collection of one fee will shift recovery of the loss to another fee and source. If cost shifting is appropriate, guidelines should be incorporated to ensure that fees for all services also share in the burden. Requests for fee adjustments are received periodically. To date none have been granted by the Boards. TMD:jt wpdnc%eM�c�a.m.n..,t Attachments (2) "IP-3" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) - DISTRICT 3 "P-31 I JOWDEVELOPMENT CO . 8363 WILSHIRE BLVD.. SUITE 634. BEVEBLY HILLS. CA 90211 (2131 653.8677 March 17, 1993 Mr. Wayne Sylvester General Manager Orange County Sanitation Department 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca. 92728-8127 RE: PARR STANTON SENIORS APARTMENTS 7622 EATELLA AVENUE STANTON, CA. Dear Mr. Sylvester: We are writing to request your consideration in re-classifying our project's designation to determine the appropriate Orange county Sanitation Departments Connection Fee. The project cannot afford the current inappropriate residential classification. The reason the proposed project requires this re-classification is because: (1) the project is loot Senior Citizen, which does not place such a burden on the sewer system, with no families or children present; (2) the project is a Low-Income project and cannot economically support a very high connection fee; (3) each unit is very small in size (approximately 500 square feet) and will not place the same burden as residential households on the sewer system; (4) the project is sorely needed in this community and is not feasible without your consideration. Please review whether a more appropriate designation might not be commercial or something other than residential, to more accurately reflect the nature of this particular project. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, (� J /J Edward M. Czukerl Vice President EMC/cmw cc: File 11P-4" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) - DISTRICT 3 "P-4" March 18, 1993 Wayne Sylvester, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018 Re: Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartment Project Dear Mr. Sylvester. The purpose of this letter is seek consideration of a reduction of the connection fee structure for the above project. Park Stanton Place which will commence construction within 120 days, is designed as a 335 unit affordable Senior Citizen Apartment Project, to be located on Vatella Avenue in the City of Stanton. The project will be of significant benefit to the City of Stanton, and the County of Orange as a whole since it will provide much-needed housing for our growing Senior population. 100% of the units will be affordable, and 30 units will be reserved for very low income Seniors. The project will allow Stemma to comply with its obligations pursuant to the Regional Housing Needs Assessment as well as the housing goals in the General Plan. It appears to me that there should be some distinction made between normal residential.dwelling units which are charged a connection fee of$2,350, and a Senior Project such as Park Stanton Place. 73 of the units are only 450 square feet, 238 units are only 550 square feet, and the remaining 28 units are a mammum of 750 square feet. The size of the units, as well as the restriction of the units to occupancy by Senior Citizens only would indicate to me that they are likely to have much less of an impact to the wastewater treatment facilities of the Districts than a single family dwelling unit. Accordingly, it would seem appropriate for the Districts to adopt a fee structure that accounts for these types of dwelling units. I am requestieg that this matter be plated on the District No. 3 Board of Directors Meeting for April 14, 1993. Sincerely, Sd-L Sal Sapien Chairman District No. 3 Sanitation Districts of Orange County "P-5" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) - DISTRICT 3 "P-5" COUNTY SANITATION `.r DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON MARCH 10, 1993 �i 901TATION R oQolimo p�Ism d tt` ca 9 y . p Sfoca 195 RgNOE coy ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES :q 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Noe. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was hold on March 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE _ ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: . Robert ochandl Chairman Thomas E Lutes x Fred Barters,Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer ' Z James M. Ferryman Nate Reade L Thomas R.Sitltarelli Leslie Forman _L Roger Stanton Vacant D16TRICT NO.r Henry W.Wedaa.Chairman x Jam M.GNllason John Collins, Chairman pro tem George Scott f_ Fred Barters Gene Beyer L Bob Ben the"Dallas Buck Catlin MOIly McC4nahan William D.Mahoney James H.Flom Maria Moreno Norman Z.Eckenrode Carrey J.Nelson Glenn Parker Z Iry Pickler Tom Daly Miguel Pulido Thomas E.Luts Z Roper Stanton Vacant George L.Zlaket Sheldon Singer DLSTN=M.3: Sal A Sateen,Chairman _ Don Martina • Burnie Contest. Chairman we tom Caney J.Nelson • Buck Catlin Molly McClanahan Z John Collin George Scott Z James V.Evans Margie L Nee • James H.Flora Well D.Mahoney �L Don R.Griffin ArMer Brown _` Gail Kerry Cecilia L.Age • Frank laselo Gwen A.Forsythe Thomas E Luh Robert Maturation g. Eva G.Miner Wally Linn f_ W Picker Tom Daly Jim Silva Fade Robitaille • Sheldon Singer George L.Zeket • Roger Stanton Vacant •_ Charles Sylvia Ronld Bates DISTRICT NO.5: x Jam C.Cox,Jr.,Chairman Jan Debay Vacant x Roger Stanton x Fell Sansone Jan Delay DISTRICT NO. 6: James A.Warner,Chairman Arthur Perry _X Evelyn Hart,Chairman pro tem Jahn C.Coa,Jr. Vacant x Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: x Charles E. Puckett.Chairman _ Thomas R. Saltarelli James A.Warner,Chairman pro tam Mike Schaefer i Fred Banera Gene Beyer Jan DebesY Pol Sanone X Barry Hammond Mike Ward L Ted More. Miguel PNido Vacant x Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: Graze winches.Chairman Earle Robitaille • Victor Wants,Chairman pro tem Jim Silva •_ Roger Stanton Vacant DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M.Gustation,Chairman Henry W.Wedaa Fred Sarera,Chairman pro tam Gen Beyer X Glenn Parker Bumie Dunlap he N.M., Tom Daly Vacant x_ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: a Pee A Gwen, Chairman Darryl Miller g Leslie Pontious,Chairman We tam Charles E. Puckers x Fred Barters Gene Bevel Barry Hamm.nd Mike Ward Vacant s Roger Stanton —2— 03/10/93 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Corinne Clawson, Chloe Dao, Patti Gorczyca, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Bob Ooten, Carol Palmer, Lou Sangermano, Mary Simpson, George Thuro, Chuck Winsor , OTHERS PRESENT: John Shaw, Assistant General Counsel, Jamil Demir, Harvey Hunt, Mary Lee, Phil Stone DISTRICT 5 The Joint Chairman announced that the Election of Chairman pro tem office of Chairman pro tem of District No. 5 had been vacated by a change in Board representation and that election of a new Chairman pro tem would, therefore, be in order. Director Phil Sansone was then duly nominated and elected Chairman pro tem of District No. 5. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that Director Adoption of resolution of appreciation Don Roth had announced his retirement from for retiring Director Don Roth the Boards of Directors, whereupon it was moved, seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-36, expressing their appreciation to retiring Director Don Roth and recognizing his outstanding contributions and dedication to public service. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Joint Chairman Mahoney stated that the resolution and a plaque would be presented to Director Roth at a later date. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized Director Fred Report of the Joint Chairman Barrera who reported on the visit of a Russian delegation that was briefed on the Districts' wastewater management program and toured the Districts' facilities last week. Director Barrera stated that the Russians were officials and others from the City of Novo Kosino, Russia, which is the City of Orange's sister city. Novo , Kosino is on the outskirts of Moscow. He further stated that they were impressed with our facilities and operations and thanked Joint Chairman Mahoney and staff for arranging to accommodate the Russian delegation. The Joint Chairman then expressed appreciation to two Districts' staff members who interpreted for the group. -3- 03/10/93 The Joint Chairman then announced the tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: `✓ Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, March 17th, at 5:30 p.m. Building Committee - Thursday, March 18th, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, March 24th, at 5:30 p.m. (Directors Barry Hammond and Gail Kerry were also invited to attend.) Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee - Thursday, March 25th, at 5:30 p.m. Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers - Tuesday, March 30th, at 5:30 p.m. Chairman Mahoney then recognized Director Buck Catlin, the Districts' representative on the National Water Research Institute (NWRI). Director Catlin requested Dr. Carol Palmer and Dr. Lou Sangermano, Laboratory Manager, to come forward. Director Catlin stated that Drs. Palmer, Sangermano and Tsai of Districts' staff had just been accepted by the American Society for Microbiology to publish and present for peer review the first two papers on research work sponsored by NWRI, which is a tremendous recognition for their work, and for the NWRI and the Districts. At Director Catlin's request, Dr. Palmer described some of the Laboratory's cutting edge research work. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager stated that he had Report of the General Manager been in touch with the new Directors who were unable to attend the orientation and treatment plant tour held on January 30th to schedule a second session. Once arrangements are made the Directors will be advised. Mr. Sylvester then stated that after the closed session for an update on the status of the engine work for the central power generating facilities, a tour of the Plant No. 1's facility would be given for those interested Directors. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered • that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. �J 03/10/93 DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes.of the regular meeting held February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -5- 03/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of Payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 02/10/93 02/24/93 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 742,727.06 S 881,009.32 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1 ,356,661.04 597,536.86 Joint Working Capital Fund - 255,923.68 188,527.46 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 3,503.48 21,008.03 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 2,844.73 1,178.72 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 13,822.88 376,721 .43 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 32,132.85 22,064.58 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 3,800.57 74,531.36 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 2,122.13 278.43 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 5,355.73 64,920.58 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 2,783.41 1 ,254.46 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 104.27 46.19 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 1,238.27 394,015.41 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 3,198.08 26,469.36 `...� DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,787.35 .00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 106.21 262.69 - 52.429.111 .74 S2.649.824.88 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide with Ninety-Day That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Rental of Processina Equipment. Resolution No. 93-20, receiving and filing Specification No. P-137, to bid tabulation and recommendation and Peroxidation Systems. Inc. awarding contract for Purchase of Hydrogen Peroxide with Ninety-Day Rental of Processing Equipment, Specification No. P-137, to Peroxidation Systems, Inc. for a unit price of $2.39 per gallon for the hydrogen peroxide, and $15,000.00 for equipment rental, for a total estimated amount not to exceed $110,600.00 plus sales tax. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. \J -6- 03/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Replacement of of Air Filter Media and Related That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Services. Specification No. 5-068, Resolution No. 93-21, receiving and filing �✓ to P. L. Hawn Company. Inc. bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Replacement of Air Filter Media and Related Services, Specification No. S-068, to P. L. Hawn Company, Inc. for a total amount not to exceed $27,385.24 plus sales tax for a one-year period beginning April 1 , 1993, with option for four one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Job No. J-19-1 That Change Order No. 19 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1 , Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $70,510.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for six items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building. Job No. J-23-1 Approving Change Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications for Job No. J-23-1 Director Collins expressed concern over the way time extensions were spread over several change order items. He stated that since the time extensions mitigated liquidated damages, they equate directly to dollars. He wanted to confirm that it was not the Boards' policy to do negotiations in days. He further requested that this change order be approved showing that the 230 day time extension was equivalent to $115,000.00 in liquidated damages. The Director of Engineering then explained that this project was very late and the contract did have a liquidated damages clause of $500.00 per day. The contractor, however, actually made claims against the Districts for considerable time extensions and made significant claims to recover extended overhead because the contractor claimed that he was delayed and this added to his costs. The final negotiation brought before the Directors, however, gives the contractor zero dollars for the extended overhead and a penalty of $57,500.00 as a resolution of the late completion days versus the claims made. `a✓ -7- 03/10/93 It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications for Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, authorizing a net deduction of $9,661.00 from the contract with J.R. Roberts Corporation for 14 items of added or deleted work, be, and is hereby, approved, amended to reflect that the 230 days time extensions obviate $115,000.00 in liquidated damages. Accepting Job No. J-23-1 as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors herebyadopt Resolution No. 93-22, accepting Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1 as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 specifications for Plant No. 1 Control Center r..� Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2, and Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44, authorizing an addition of $35,125.00 to the contract with HSQ Technology for two items of additional work or revised contract provisions, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Job No. P2-43-1 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-23, approving plans and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, and authorizing the General Manager to receive bids on March 23, 1993. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -B- 03/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Holmes & Narver. That the Selection Committee certification l Inc. for design and construction of the final negotiated fee relative to the �a✓ services for Job Nos. P7-44 and Professional Services Agreement with P2-53 Holmes & Narver, Inc. for design and ' construction services required for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44, and Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-24, approving said agreement with Holmes & Narver, Inc., on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $1,997,510.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS In response for a request for clarification Deferring consideration of Purchase regarding the purchase of radio equipment, of Two-Way Radio Equipment Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of (Specification No. E-227) Maintenance, reported that the proposed purchase is for both new and replacement equipment for the Districts' larger, overall radio communication system which is supplied by Motorola and maintained under contract by the County. Equipment is replaced on about a 15-year cycle and new equipment is added to meet increased communication requirements because of treatment plant expansions. In response to another question as to whether the Districts' two-way radio communication system is connected to the County-wide 800 MHz emergency system, Mr. Hodges advised the Directors that the Districts are not currently involved in the 800 MHz system. Preliminary discussions were held with the County some time ago and at that time it did not appear as if that system would best accommodate the Districts' radio communication needs. Following further discussion the Directors then suggested that staff further review the 800 MHz system with the County and report back. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That consideration of the Purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment (Specification No. E-227(, from Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. in the amount of $38,383.00 plus sales tax, be, and is hereby, deferred to a future meeting pending a staff review and report on the appropriateness of the Districts participating in the County-wide 800 MHz system. -9- 03/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve staff Summary Financial Report for the That the staff Summary Financial Report for `1 six-month period ending the six-month period ending December 31, December 31 . 1992 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive. file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committee Committee's meeting and Executive Committee's meeting held on February 17, 1993 and February 24, 1993, respectively, be and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving donation of laboratory benches and fume hoods to the That the Boards of Directors do hereby Southern California Coastal Water authorize and approve the donation and Research Project Authority transfer of laboratory benches and fume (SCCWRPA) hoods that have been determined to be surplus to the Districts' present or future needs, to the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority ISCCWRPAI. `✓ ALL DISTRICTS The Director of Engineering reported that in Approving plans and specifications accordance with the 1989 Master Plan, in for Secondary Treatment Expansion October 1989, the Directors authorized the at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-2 design and construction of a series of projects that will upgrade and expand the existing secondary treatment capacity at both plants. Accordingly, construction plans and specifications have been prepared for the first of such projects, Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2. He further reported that this project will increase the capacity of the existing advanced secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 2 from 75 million gallons per day (MGD) to 90 MGD. This work will include extension of the existing secondary clarifiers an additional 50 feet, construction of a fourth dissolved air flotation thickener, automated thickened waste activated sludge feed to the existing digesters, and an upgraded sidestream pump station. This expansion also includes a satellite control station that will provide operations staff the ability to control many aspects of the secondary treatment process from a remote location. Also, a small platform will be included that will allow tour groups to view the secondary treatment and look over the Huntington Beach Wetlands to the south. Permits have been received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the Coastal Commission, Fish and Game Department, as well as others. The engineer's estimate for this work is $22,000,000. -10- 03/10/93 It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-25, approving plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job `..✓ No. P2-42-2, and authorizing the General Manager to receive bids on March 16, 1993. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these ' minutes. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors of General Counsel's Comments Prior to the need for a closed session as authorized Closed Session by Government Code Section 54956.9 to review: 11 Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to the co-generation internal combustion engines. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section The Boards convened in closed session at 54956.9 8:20 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Boardls) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:42 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7&11 Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to adiusting the shares of various Districts of the cost of certain improvements to joint facilities Report of General Manager The General Manager reported that in 1989 the Boards adopted a 30-year wastewater management action plan that included provisions for funding approximately one-half of the $1 .5 billion projected capital expenditure needs over that 30-year term by issuance of debt. Since then the Districts have issued three Certificates of Participation: Series A, B and C, which total a little over $317,000,000. _11_ 03/10/93 The COP funds are utilized to construct both treatment facilities at the two treatment plants, as well as individual District trunk sewer projects. One of the requirements for tax-exempt status on the COP issues is that `✓ the funds must be expended within a 24-month period, otherwise the District must pay a penalty into the Federal Treasury on the funds that are unexpended. In arriving at the COP issue amount, we had to make estimates in 1991 for the two-year period of construction for the numerous projects that are included in each of the COP issues. To date our track record has been excellent. However, in District 5 it does not appear as if they will be able to meet the 24-month expenditure commitment for series B. There are a couple of reasons for this. The Districts have been getting excellent construction bids on our projects so the overall construction cost has been reduced significantly. The other reason is staff has had to reschedule projects because of other budgetary considerations. Mr. Sylvester stated that total overall expenditures for the Districts will meet the requirement. However, District 5 will have a shortfall because the estimate was off by a little over 1 % over the three-year period for the A, B and C issues. Staff has been working with bond counsel for some time because we have seen this problem coming and have been trying to figure out how to avoid District 5 having to pay a penalty. The urgency of this matter is because we only have about two months left for draw down of the Series B proceeds. The General Manager reported that Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe, the bond counsel firm, has been working on this and has just within the last few days devised a solution. The solution provides for a reallocation of COP proceeds for both Series B and C. The allocation for Series B between District 5 and the other Districts would be adjusted by $4.3 million. The reverse transaction would take place for Series C. The bottom line is that the transaction would not cost any of the other Districts anything and would potentially save District 5 about $125,000.00 in penalties. The transaction is merely a reallocation of proceeds between Districts for Series B and C, which washes out in the end to a net of zero for each of the Districts. -12- 03/10/93 Authorizing consideration of Supplemental Agenda Item relative to adjusting the shares of various Districts of the cost of certain improvements to joint facilities " Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of a supplemental agenda item relative to adjusting the shares of various Districts of the cost of certain improvements to joint facilities, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated March 10, 1993, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Approving Resolutions re adiustina the shares of various Districts of the cost of certain improvements to joint facilities Moved, seconded and duly carried by each respective District: That its Board of Directors hereby adopts the following resolutions approving adjusting the shares of various Districts of the cost of certain improvements to joint facilities: DISTBICT RESOLUTION NO. 1 93-29-1 2 93-30-2 3 93-31-3 5 93-32-5 6 93-33-6 7 93-34-7 11 93-35-11 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. -13- 03/10/93 DISTRICTS 1 . 6. 7 & 14 Actions re Baker-Gisler Interceptor from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Gisler `O Avenue. Contract No. 14-1-1A-2. and Modifications to Santa Ana/Dyer Road Trunk, Contract No. 1-16 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract Nos. 14-1-1A-2 and 1-16 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of $88,804.00 to the contract with Steve P. Rados, Inc. for 11 items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 44 calendar days for completion of the additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Contract Nos. 14-1-1A-2 and 1-16 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of $14,434.00 to the contract with Steve P. Rados, Inc. for adjustment of engineer's quantities, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Contract Nos. 14-1-1A-2 and 1-16 as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-26, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -14- 03/10/93 DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue purchase order to E. L. Yeager Construction That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to Company. Inc. for removal of a issue a purchase order to E. L. Yeager portion of the abandoned Construction Company, Inc. for removal of a Santa Ana/Dyer Road Trunk Sewer portion of the abandoned Santa Ana/Dyer Road Trunk Sewer for an amount not to exceed $41,000.00. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the ..✓ meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-36 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-27-5, approving plans and specifications for Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the - meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993. -15- 03/10/93 DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors �.,.' of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the .Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ordering Annexation No. 1 - San Joaquin Hills Road Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-28-14, ordering annexation of 54.52 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of San Joaquin Hills Road and Newport Coast Drive in unincorporated County territory (Annexation No. 1 - San Joaquin Hills Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 14). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993. 6!/ ✓ Assistant Secr ry of a Boards of Directors of County Sani ation of Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -16- FUND NO 9I99 - 41 GIST WORMING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/0/93 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAN4E COUNTY CLAIMS PAID L2/16/93 POSTING DATE L2/1G/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127741 AS TECH COMPANY Sbb.730.9. RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 127742 AMERICAN TLLEFNONL S TELEGRAPH 51.363.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 127743 A S 6 DRILLING INC. 11.669.25 DRILLING 88RVICEB 127744 AARON BROTHERS ANT MARTS s:91.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127745 ACROBURR 6217.22 327746 ACTION ELECTRONICS $2.6.96 USER INSTRUMENTFEE OVERPAYMENT 127747 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP 135.320.U4 GINEERIN PARTS 127748 AIR COLD SUPPLY I6C $19.33 AIR CONDITIONING NINSERGI CGS 127749 AIR PRODUCTS A LHLMICAL 1N fV..}2.D0 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS 127750 AIR A WASTE MGMT. ASSOC. 486.00 O&M AGREEMENT TRAT ON T SYST M.0.8-9-89 RAINING REGISTRATION 127751 AMERSHAM CONY SJ98.6W T LAB SUPPLI88 127752 ANAHEIM SHbNES MOBILE HOME f5..24.69 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127753 ANCIENT MARINER RESTAURANT 137.9, 127754 ABC LABORATORIES $235.00 LAB SERVICES OVERPAYMENT LAB ORM RENT 127756 ARMOR BERV ICES INC f9r144.4e UNIFORM RENTALS ITTX 127756 ARMOR - VAC ,913.99 STREET TRUCK SE X 127755 PENURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. l59.9U.99 VACUUM TRUCK NCE ADMINISTRATOR = 127759 DENTAL INSURANCE SERVICES CONSULT. 309.L1. DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINI9TMTOR 227760 BFI PORTABLE SEpV ICES f3U9.1V PORTABLE TOILETS 127761 B.M.I. 1J3...I OFFICE SUPPLIES _{ 127761 SAW SAFETY E SUPPLY SA1.3 1167.7. SAFETY SUPPLIES 127763 BAKER CAC s167.7r OFFICE SUPPLIES 127763 BANK OF THE SETT si1u37.29 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION J-23-2 127765 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 5:.317.29 BATTERIES 12771b BAUER [ODWARDS4P >.26.95 SAFETY ESUPPLIES OVERPAYMENT 127766 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS 18.972.65 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127768 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC aB.912.G5 LAB SUPPLI88 121769 BELL SN SECURITY s.11.53 LAB SUPPLIES 127769 BELL ILAD $14$571.02 TEMPORARY 88CURITY 86RVIC63 127771 B7 tlBIRDAV INC a571.O2 USER MATERIALS 127771 BLOC BIRD MOTEL $193.33 USBR F86 OVERPAYMENT 127773 BOEHRIN6ER CASE MAN NHL IM ,196.48 LAB SUPPLIES 127774 NOISE CASCADE ETC PRODUCTS a196.A8 OFFICE SUPPLI88 127775 BON-A-RUES sJn 6.21 TRUCK PARTS 127776 BDRNBRANN PUMPS, INC a.3$141.25 PUMP PARTS 127777 Y J BRANSFORD f1RT.25 LAB FEE OVERPAYMENT 12TTIS BRENNERSON CORP S ASSOC IN si..tl95... CON SUPPLIES 127779 BRIHDER-S CO s-1.6:A.W. CONSTRUCTION J-19-2 12778C BURLINGTO EENGINEE $tl7A7 HARDWARE 127781 BUSINEGTON ENGINEERING 4.al.63 USER F86 OVERPAYMENT 127762 BUSINESS FUDLISHIRS1PS INC S2S7.0. PUBLICATION 127763 GAMY G STRE ED aa..54.65 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 127784 CS COMPANY a..S195.95 TRAINS 127785 1993 CWPCA CONFERENCE alY S.GL TRAINING REGISTRATION 127785 CAL- SM SSCHE IC a.00.5a THAWING REGISTRATION 127786 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CU INC >.LG.Stl CHEMICALS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WURNIN6 CAPITAL PNOCLSSIN6 DATE 2/43/93 PAGE a NEPURT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION OISTRILTS Of ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PA10 .2/10/93 PUS7IN4 DATE s1/1G/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR APOUAT DESCRIPTION 127787 CALTROL INC a5.5VO.r. FITTINGS 127768 CALIFORNIA PROPERTY MORT 31.N98.86 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127789 JOHN CAROLED LN61NEENS Sc3.973.31 6NGIN88RING 36RVIC83 P1-38 127790 CENTURY FAINT $191.6, PAINT SUPPLIES 127791 CENTURY SAFETY INST a SVFP S.rbe7L3] 9 127792 CHROMALON SALES $1,060.54 SAFETY SUPPLIES ELECTRIC PARTS 127793 CHROME CRANKSHAFT INC 4945.u4 MACHINE PARTS 127794 CONNCH AMU SUNS $59b$139.1. CONSTRUCTION I-9 127796 CONNEC70R TCCFARTS CO a139.1J 12779G CONN CLL GM FARTS / OIV ar5 e.il USER FEE OVERPAYMENT TRUCK PARTS 127790 CONSOLIDATED CHEMICAL ELECTRICAL DIST a7.912.75 ELECTRIC EUPPLI88 127799 CONTINENTAL ANOXIC AL CO a1.232.5G CHLORINE 127800 CONVERSE LOON STURL >.92.85 S0OL9 127601 CONVERSE INDUSTRIES CONSULTANTS 0 C $2r561.12 SOIL GENERATOR PG 127802 COOPER INOUS TFI ES INC S149.77 GENERATOR PARTS 127803 COSTAR 5536.60 LABRENTAL SUPPLIES 227064 R E COULTER CRANE PENILE a536.U4 X 12T8 GA COUNTY YnULLSaII 4EC1Pll i2r u3r.e9 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 2 ELEC�TRIC qU SUP PLIES 1270 CALIF INTEGRATED WASTE PUBLICATION 12T906 SYRCy/BPTCP FEES 311r4G0.00 OCEAN MONITORING 127808 DAISY PL U TIME a197.UU PLUMBING PARTS 127809 DENIALS 7COR SERVICE Sr78..r TIRES a 127810 OE GN2G CORPORATION 6150.6U RENTAL EQUIPMENT N 127811 HSM/OEACO $391.3T ELECTRIC BVPPLIE9 127812 OIL TACO RON a391.09 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127812 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL a5.$54.05 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-12-92 127614 DIGITAL PO UIPMENTTEC iS9.95 PRINTING 127815 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP liA.S53.3r COMPUTER OVERPAYMENT - LIMS/CMNS 127815 DITTY DRUM a53.9V USER F88 OVERPAYMENT 12781E DOVEDO ENTERPRISES INC 39.I66.VG PLANT MAINTENANCE 8 REPAIRS 127818 DOVEP ELEVATOR COMPANY S178.L. SERVICE AGREEMENT 127819 OYNN EDV AEDS CO Ef 978.18 PAINT SUPPLIES 127820 EAGLEYNLX $21569.V6 TOOL PARTS 127821 EAGLE ENTERPRISES a569.62 TOOL 127822 EASTNAN INC S5.691.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127622 ENCHANTER S INC alr4bl.G. COMPUTER CONSULTING 127824 ENCHANTER INC a5$534.57 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 227825 ESSENCES$ INK CO *572.15 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127926 ESSENCE GROEVANP >ST2.1S OFFICE EQUIPMENT 127827 CHAR LEE LVANS I GRAVEL al A$246.6. CONSULTING SERVICES M.O. 11-18-92 127827 FAT SAND DANDISPOSAL GRAVEL ERV INC a296.6L ROAD BASE 127829 FALCON pEXPOESS SERVICE Sb 156U..L RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.O.10-9-91 127830 FEDERAL EXPRESS LOPP a5U5.J5 AIR FNEIGNT 127831 FISRELLGAS a129.5e PROPANE 127832 FISCNER 6 FURTER CO 36.b5b.69 CHLORINATION PARTS 127832 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO - s55tl.6Y LAB SUPPLI89 FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WUHMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/u5/93 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CUUNTY SANIIATIOH UISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAIU .2/14/93 POSTING DATE G2/I1/93 VAPRANT NO. VLROON 6MOUN1 UESCRIPIION 127833 PIECES INSTRUMCNTS 61.6.60 LAB SUPPLIES 127834 FLO-SYSTEMS %187.54 PUMP PARTS 227855 FLUORANICS INC .311.bT CHLORINATION PARTS 127836 FOSS ENVIRONMENTAL 1864.2b JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 127637 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY s3.S17.OG WATER USAGE 127838 FOUNTAIN VALLLV PAINT .136.iO PAINT SUPPLIES 127839 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES S1.07C.56 TOOLS 127840 THL FOXBORO GO *629.29 INSTRUMENT 127841 FREDERICK FUNP L EMGINELAIN 6665.61 CHLORINATION PARTS 127b12 G.C. INDUSTRIES $1.127.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127813 68S INCURFORATLO SIGS.53 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127644 GET, INC. 5668.97 COMPUTER PARTS 127005 GANAML LUMBER CO 6764..W LUMBER 127246 GAS RECOVERY SVSLEMS 91.137.79 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127847 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $2.169.75 FIBERGLASS FABRIGTION 127848 GENERAL BINDING CORP $87.49 EQUIPMENT REPAIR X 127849 GENERAL TELEPHONE CU 6149.b4 TELEPHONE SERVICES Z 127650 GEORGE LEECH A ASSOCIATES 6.9.86 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127851 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC 126.965.17 MECHANICAL PARTS W 127852 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $173.56 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127853 00% GREEN a ASSOCIATES 1166.64 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 127854 H KOCH As SONS 6547.61 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT n 127855 MSG TECONOL06T 53.7.236..4 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2 127856 MACH COMFANT 1643.1. LAB SUPPLIES W 127857 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTI 54.622.W7 PIPE 127858 FL "AWN CO INC 5609.67 FILTER 127859 MERMAN MILLEN INC 1782.16 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127860 HEWLETT PACKARD 669J.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT 127861 HILTI INC sia3.46 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 127862 MIAOW METAL FINISMINN 642b.a. USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127863 J.T. HORVATH s ASSOC. 63.136.6E CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1 127864 AS HUSHES CO INC 61.292.L9 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 127865 MUMANA HOSPITAL 69..35.9i USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127866 HUNGRY TIGER 817CS $2.684.71 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127867 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER SIX $14.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127868 MUNTIN670N SIGNAL OIL CO $"I..% USER PER OVERPAYMENT 127b69 IRD RECMANALVSIS 13.958.7. INSTRUMENT PARTS 127870 IMPERIAL NEST CHEMICAL 33...23.5. FERROUS CHLORIDE H.O.11-18-92 127071 INDUSTRIAL THREADED FRODUCTS $737.14 CONNECTORS 127072 INGRAM PAPER s292.2. In SUPPLIES 127b73 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. 6.7.14 TRUCK PARTS 127F7e IN-N-OUT BURGER $15.52 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127875 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT S94..6 WATER USAGE 127876 J A M DEMURRING S91.0 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127877 GREAT WESTLRN SANITARY SUPP $990.11 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 127878 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO s5G8.58 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/93 PAGE 4 RLPURT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAIU L2/IU/93 PUSIINU GAIL u2/lu/YS WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127919 JIM-S SUSPENSION SLRVICL 125.bL TRUCK PARTS 121880 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARL C 153..br SAFETY SUPPLIES 127881 MAN PRODUCTS 177.8b HARDWARE 127882 METTENBURG MARINE $991.2. LAB SUPPLIES 227883 KING BEARING INC S..3.9.11 MACHINE SUPPLIES 127884 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES ilU•OI U.2u TOOLS 127605 MARTIN KORDICM Sk 43.06.6E 127086 LAUNDERLANO 3765.65 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT SERVICES I-9 227697 LEE L NO CONSULTING THIN 14.543.9, USER EER NG SERVICES ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5 127069 NBC CORP 4G95.33 OCEANJANITORIAL MONITORING SUPPLIBS 32]B09 NBC APPLIED ENY IR ONMENIAL i91S.13 12TO90 MPS OCEAN MONITORING f3O.60 PHOTOGRAPHIC SBRVIC83 127891 NAG SYSTEMS 1617.72 INSTRUMENT PARTS 227893 MART AC ELECTRONICS s11L.24 INSTRUMENT ATI PARTS 127893 MATT - ICHLORNSTRUMENTS INC i4.205.19 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES >rrl< 127895 MCtl AIR (CIRCUITS IS 1400.00 LAB SUPPLIE9 >C 127696 MC CURDY CIRCUITS INC. 82 $7.316.62 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 2 127696 MC DONALDS >316.E2 USER F88 OVERPAYMENT 127897 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS 13u.666.67 REMARKETING AGREEMENT 127898 MICROAGE OF CLMRITOS 413.161.67 CONFUTER SOFTWARE 127899 M CRD SE MI CORP. 11.353.19 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127900 MISCO i1.487.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES D 2279C1 .. MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO a312.00 METER '127902 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES 12.W26.UU LAB SERVICES 1279C3 MONTROY SUFFLY CU 1140.71 SAFETY SUPPLIES 127901 "ORION SALT AND/OR 1179.93 SALT 127905 MOTEL 6 LP f379.79 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127906 NOTION INDUSTRIES INC f4YU.15 MECHANICAL PARTS 1279C7 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY f210.69 JANITORIAL SUPPLIBS 12790E NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS $1.719.28 BUILDING SIGNS 127969 NEWARK ELECTRuNICS .452.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127910 NEWPONI CENTER MEDICAL 02 .6.1b8.23 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127911 NORTHGATE CONFUTLR SYSTEMS 1935.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127912 NORTHWESTERN CARBON $4.297.17 CHEMICALS 127913 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICLS 4514.O5 SAFETY GLASSES 127914 THE OMMART COMP iBEr.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127915 UK SYSTEMS CU 1:9.604.57 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 127916 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PANTS C f.35.2b TRUCK PARTS 127917 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO $2.862.45 CHEMICALS 127918 ORANGE COURIER f3210L FREIGHT 127919 ORANGE VALVE 0 FITTING CO. 1311.38 FITTINGS 127920 OXYGEN SLPVICE S.040..9 SPECIALTY GASES 127921 COUNTY SANIIATIUN DISIRILI Ya.e53.U4 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT 127922 PC SYSTEMS DESIGN $183.974.94 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 127923 PEST $1,526.75 SEWER TV INSPECTION 127924 PACIFIC PARTS $330.37 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 2103/93 PAGE 5 RLPUNT NUMULR AP43 COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID :2/IL/53 LUSTING RAIL .2/14/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AKUUNI ULSCNIPIION 127925 PACIFIC PUULISHLRS Sb7.CL INSTRUMENT PARTS 327926 PACIFIC SAFETY LQDIFRENT CO 14.164.2b SAFETY SUPPLIES 127927 PACIFIC BELL 439.3. TELEPHONE SERVICES 12792A PACIFIC UTILITY FROLUCTS SIL6.L9 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127929 PADRE JANITORIAL DUFF 1..r G9.f. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 127936 PARAGON CADLL 14W.7b CABLE SERVICES 127931 PARSONS TECHNOLOGY a36.25 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 127932 PANTS UNLIFITLU 1964.Ub TRUCK PARTS 127933 PEROSIDATION 13.56b.bu CHEMICALS 127934 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC SIu3.196.Si RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 127935 POLYPURE INC f26.125.U. CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 127936 POWER TRACK INC Seu.55 PUMP PARTS 127937 HAROLD FRINROSE ICL SN Y.u• ICE 127938 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $4,818.4. SOIL TESTING 127939 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 14,960.L6 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 ITT 127940 PULSAFEEDER $160.7. PUMP PARTS X 127941 PUTZKEISTER INC Se.63i.23 PUMP PARTS S 127942 OUESTRON CORP 12.409.LL LAB SUPPLIES 127943 RYC CARWASH 13S.3b USER FEE OVERPAYMENT bO 127944 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO 122b.92 LAB SUPPLIES 127945 RECTC INC 552.467.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-13-91 127946 :EDT EMPRESS f,a 3b MESSENGER SERVICES n 127947 MCJUNKIN-REFUBLIC SUPPLY S3.u18.5. PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1 127948 ROCK INDUSTRIES 1709.73 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT V1 127949 JIM ROY EQUIPMENT aL43.51 LAB SUPPLIES 127950 NOYCE INSTRUMENT 31 u7i.iW INSTRUMENT PARTS 127951 RYCOM INSTRUMENTS INC $334.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127952 JOSEPH T RYERSON 6 SON IN 12.160.4W METAL 127953 SKC WEST 11.876.6, SAFETY SUPPLIES 12T9E4 SAFETY-KLEE1. CORP 11,111.b3 PARTS CLEANER 127955 SANCON ENGINEERING INC a525.4G SEWER REPAIRS 127956 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC ROTUND S764.43 ELECTRIC MOTOR 127957 SANTA FE WAG CO - S29.G3 FREIGHT 127958 SCIENCE APFLICA71ONS INT4L f.55.332.1: OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 127959 SCA COAST DESIGNS f735.61 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 127960 SHAMROCK SCILNIIFIC SPLC SYS s9 e.ba LAB SUPPLIES 127961 SHAMROCK SUFFLY faW0.6b LAB SUPPLIES 127962 SMELDANL, INC SYre]Y.iY USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127963 SHILEY INC 6L,75L96 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 327964 SHURELUCK SALLS ib.bO4.71 HARDWARE/PUMP PARTS 127965 SIOUA HONEY ASSOC 14.547.:2 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127966 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP SY16.22 ELECTRIC PARTS 127961 SOUTH COAST 4ATFR $136.13 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127968 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CU Su.3Ui.76 POWER 227969 SO CAL GAS CO 1.8.674.62 NATURAL GAS 127970 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CU $2,955.66 DIESEL FUEL FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/u3/93 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAID Lc/i4/9] POSTING DATE Y,/11/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127971 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 12r309.20 DRINKING WATER.COOLER RENTALS 127972 STROMBENG PRUOUCTS s9q..E SERVICE AGREEMENT 127973 SUNSET FORD 1]17.L. TRUCK PARTS 127974 SUPER SOLDER SERVICES ♦107.79 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127975 TAGGINr NAOGON MOUILMOME PA. 11,GU3.9b USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127976 TAYLUR-DUWN MF4 COMPANY A622.54 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 127977 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUFFLY 32r506.Z3 MECHANICAL PARTS 127978 TONY-$ LOCK L SAFE SERVICE sYbb.b9 LOCKS, KEYS G SERVICE 127979 TGYO LANDSCAPING CO 19r53..37 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.11-13-91 127980 YRANSMATION INC $1r 375.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1279 TRAVEL EYL$ a355. TRAVEL SERVICES 127962 TRAVEL TRAVEL AYEL 3935... TRAVEL SERVICES 1279638] TUSTI W DODGE SUPPN INC >7tl1.5C TRUCK PARTS 127985 TUSTIN DLABO 131.5E TRUCK PARTS 127966 TWINING LABORATORIES OF >br 151.68 LAB KSERVICES PARTS 12798E US POST GLASS TENS S37.lq TRUCK PARTS ITT>< 327968 US POSTAL SERVICE $.37.1V USER FEE OVERPAYMENT X 127989 UNOCAL 138..86 UNLEADED GASOLINE 2 127990 UNITED CONCRETE RVICLhllS 3353.4E CONCRETE S 127991 UNITED PARCEL SLNVICE 3199.99 PARCEL SERVICES 127992 UNITED PHARMACY INC a.1746.21 USED FEE OVERPAYMENT .--I 227993 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP s196.65 BUILDING AGREEMENT 127994 UNIVERSAL FLOORING SYSTEMS 161.0E BUILDING SUPPLIES n 127995 UNIVERSITY SClLN OF CPYAII a$3.544.3. HATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE PROJECT 127996 YWfl SCIENTIFIC i3.G99.]1 LAB SUPPLIES � 12799E VALCO INSTRUMENTS CO sitl i.ltl LAB SUPPLIES 127998 VARLET CITIES SUPPLY CO $9.91tl.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIEe 127999 VERTEX ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS s2r3U8.95 LAB SUPPLIES 128COO WAREHOUSE SYSTEMS a1.137.69 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 126401 CARE XOWAR RESTAURANT SJ9808.44 USER F¢8 OVERPAYMENT 128002 EARL WARREN S CO S3.3.99 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 128003 YATCRMAN MEMBERSHIP 1363.6E CHAIN 128004 CATS REUSE MINSTRUMEN $1r$77.23 AGENCY MEMBERSHIP 228005 WEST COAST INSTRUMENTS MEN TS 317.23 INSTRUMENT PARTS 128005 WEST NEYPORI OIL CO s15.997.b6 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 128006 WESTERN HIGHMEDICAL FRDU UCTS IN 0001 2 PAINT FEE OVERPAYMENT 120E07 WESTERN MEDICAL WELTER 3b"Il..5 USER FE6 ODARH.O.e-T 128OC9 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $]6$340.25 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92 126010 WHETHER LAB SALES INC 119O.Z5 LAB SUPPLIES 128611 WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC 16.691.38 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 128G11 ICK ROYAL MU63LL $e.95 b.5. USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 128012 XEROX}ERR} CORFYARD >i4.42Y.2. COPIER LEASES 128014 GEORGE YA YOK06 CO Sb93.65 INSTRUMENT PARTS 128015 YORKSON INTERNATIONAL CORP 1397.65 INSTRUMENT PARTS 12BG15 PORK INTERNPTIONPL as89.O2 ELECTRIC PARTS ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID G/IC/93 12.4Z9.311.74 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02/03/93 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/10/93 POSTING DATE 02/10/93 SUMMARY AMOUNT 41 OPER FUND $2,844.73 42 OPER FUND $9,127.73 42 CAP FAC FUND $5,695.15 43 OPER FUND $32,132.85 45 OPER FUND $3,304.57 45 CAP FAC FUND $496.00 46 OPER FUND $2,122.13 47 OPER FUND $5,265.25 47 CAP FAC FUND $90.48 411 OPER FUND $2,793.41 413 OPER FUND $104.27 414 OPER FOND $623.35 f7l 414 CAP FAC FUND $624.92 X 4586 OPER FUND $3,198.08 S 46L7 OPER FUND $2,787.35 47814 OPER FUND 4106.21 w JT OPER FUND $742,727.06 CORP $1,356,661.04 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $3,503.48 a JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $255,923.68 I ______________ V $2,429,111.74 FUND NO 9199 - Jl DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/18/93 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID r2/24/93 PUSTING DATE 62/21/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 12SE38 AS TECH COMPANY 156,843.0. RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-93 12SC39 A T b T $4,101.64 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 128040 A T b T 1186.18 126G41 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC s:3L.WG LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES LAB SERVICES 128042 ACTION DOOR REPAIR COOP a3r910.0b 128043 AIR PROOUCTS A CHLMICAL 1N fJ9.8e4. OVERHEAD DOOR REPAIRS .. 12SC44 ALADDIN HOUSE $961.47 GUM AGREEMENTGEN SVST M.0.0-9-89 BUILDING MATERIALS 128095 ALLIED SUPPLY [0 f27 J.9T VALVE SUPPLIE9 128L16 AMEPICAN 514MA a86U.6k REPAIR PARTS 12SC48 AMICUNoNAHEIM INC SE siln.OG LAB SUPPLIES 12804E ANGEL S SEWER CONSTRUCTION 16.605.60 I"SEWERS REPAIRS 128050 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC UTIONCTS f�.u2i.b6 LAB SUPPLIES 128052 'AN - DISTRIBUTION a190.69 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 128052 ANTHONYTMONY PENT CONTROL s90.Uu MACHINE REPAIRS 228053 ANIMDNYr$ MCCM b MACMINtr INC. se02.24 MACHINE RB PAIR9 128054 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 12.722.86 NOTICES 6 ADS fTl 228455 0.8E LABORATORIES 316.J60.0W SERVICE AGREEMENT X 220056 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC lba T.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS 2 128056 ARMOR - VAC 1500.W4 STREET SHEKPING SERVICES 12805T AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO 419E.D. TRUCK PARTS 128659 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESS3H4 s:u 12ul.b9 PAYROLL NROCESBING SERVICE9 120V60 B b D ENTERPRISES a2U0.b1 INSTRUMENT PARTS 129061 SAW LANDFILL 34.$71.26 RESIDUAL REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 V.1 128062 HIL SAFETY K b SUPPLY 6T1.26 SAFETY SUPPLIE9 N 128063 BINARY CAECA •343.1. DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF 120U64 BANANA MAUEPRINI $9r J43.19 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES 128065 B BATE MAN 1693.35 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128065 BATTERY COMPRESSOR 3ES S.15.J5 MCHINEBATTERIES 128666 BAUEE CONPNESSUP a.15.51 MACHINE PARTS 12006 6AATER DIAOgOSllCS INC a3.291.b LAB SUPPLIE9 128068 BIN--a INC a1.213. . SAFETY EQUIPMENT 128069 BON-A-RUES a115.4393 TRUER PARTS 128070 BORNENA EN PUMPS,INEERI INC ,198.28 PUMP PARTS 128071 BROWN ENGINEERING CYNF i39.29b.26 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-19 12807E BROWN 0 JANITORIAL CONS UL TIg4 $6.650.T3 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-11-1 128L73 BUDGET AND ASSuCI si.650.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 12SET9 BUSH 6Np REEUC TAT LS INC 31Jr592.WW SURVEYING SERVICES EMENT 30-92 1260T5 GARY 4 STRE ED f2$494.57 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 128016 CUTE ER PAPER COMPANY 5999.51 OFFICE 3UPPLIES 12801T CEPA 319D.su LAB SUPPLIES 128079 C M 1 1116.Su ELECTRIC PARTS 128080 CAL-GLASS FOR RCSE A0.CX INC. a914.b9 LAB SUPPLIES 128081 CALIFOL A A $1.2.1.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS 128082 CALIFORNIA AUTO NCUL 61NLERS INC .Lb4.09 TRUCK PARTS 12808E SJOHNUSI CARULLD Eq bINCEFS a$5.549.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-39 128083 SUSIE CAVES [` 15.549.51 DEFERRED COMP NITHDRAMAL FUND NO 9299 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/18/93 PALE 2 REPORT NUMbER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID L4/.9/93 PO4TIN6 DAIL L2/24/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 12BO84 CENTURY SAFETY INST A SUPP 15.727.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128885 DICK CEPEK INC f:b2.Cb TRUCK PARTS 1281186 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT S1.093.99 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128087 CULE-PARNER INSTRUMENT Cu a193.3u LAB SUPPLIES 128088 COMPUSA. INC. S5.749.87 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/SUPPLIER 128089 COMPUSENVE $10.47 COMPUTER SERVICES 128090 CONDENSER A CHILLER SLRVILL S2.214.84 ELECTRIC SERVICES 128092 CONNELL GM PARTS / OIV $662.36 TRUCK PARTS 128092 CONSOLIDATED LLLCTRICAL DIST 15.987.91 ELECTRIC PARTS 128693 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 34.bo9.4+ PUMP PARTS 128094 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO s"674.44 CHLORINE 128695 CONTRACTOR OS BOOK STORE 1283.UL LAB SUPPLIES 128096 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC a..142.9b INSTRUMENT PARTS 128697 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 95A2.iG TRUCK PARTS 128098 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC i2.238.4b ELECTRIC PARTS 128099 VERNE COX CO. REAL ESTATE AFPR ST.L00.0G APPRAISAL SERVICES rn 128100 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $13,616.06 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT SERVICES X 128161 STATE WATER RESOURCES CQMTKUL 1597.56 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEES Z 128102 STATE WRCB/AFRS FEES 19V0.00 OCEAN DISCHARGE FEES 128103 DAILY PILOT SB0.40 NOTICES 6 ADS CIV 128104 J.W. 0•ANGLLO CO INC SI.460.26 PIPE ::; 128105 DANI ELS TIRE SERVICE 11.073.G1 TIRES 128306 DANNY DEXTER $59.57 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF bO 120107 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO 39.19J.60 VALVES I 12810E DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 45.815.07 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-12-92 N 128109 GIFILIFPO ASSOCIATLS 5386.b2 PRINTING 128110 BOLLINGER CORP 1990.31 FILTER 120111 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC 12,040.UO PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 128112 ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC 15,40U.LO INS. CONSULTING SERVICES 128113 EASTMAN INC S4.534.0 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128114 ECOANALYSIS INC 12.767.22 - OCEAN MONITORING H.O.7-17-91 128115 ELECTRO-TEST INC .11.44... ELECTRICAL SERVICES 128116 ELECTED DYNAMIC SERVICES 12.b29.DU ELECTRICAL SERVICES 128117 ENCHANTER INC $3.920.0C OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-I0-92 128128 ENVIREK 51.957.lb TECHNICAL SERVICES 228119 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC A7i2.0e LAB SERVICES 126120 CHARLES EVANS S "SOC. 5112.7be.Lu ENGINE CONSULTING SERV. M.O.2-10-93 126221 FNC CORP $308.O. LAB SUPPLIES 128122 FIT SAND AND GRAVEL INC 3804.14 ROAD BASE 128123 MARSHALL fAIRRES 5126.Cb DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128124 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICL S..6u0.Lu RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 128125 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD SA23.5L AIR FREIGHT 128226 FERRELL&AS lob.1, PROPANE 128227 FISCHER 1 PORTER CO Sl.-63.17 CHLORINATION PARTS 126128 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 1227.57 LAB SUPPLIES 228129 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. 5160.44 CONCRETE CUTTING FUND NO 9199 - JT DISI WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2118193 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP13 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID L:1.4/93 POSTING GAIE CZ/24/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OLSCRIPTION 128130 CLIFFORD A FORKERI 49.186.4J SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 128131 FOSS ENVIRONMENTAL 11..b I.A9 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 12B132 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 8836.4G FILM 128133 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT S716.65 PAINT SUPPLIES 226134 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES 41.5119.41 TOOLS 128135 THE FOXBORO CV itl2).bL ELECTRIC PARTS 226136 FREDSON RV SUPPLY >05.41 TRUCK PARTS 128137 BUD FRLY 521.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128138 GSI. INC. 5:.636.'. PRINTING SUPPLIES 228139 GANAHL LUMBER CO 12.2]].61 BUILDING MATERIALS 128240 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS Sir.50.LL BUILDING MATERIALS 128141 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $1.089.87 TELEPHONE SERVICES 128142 GIERLICM-MITCHELL INC 421.1J2.63 MACHINE SUPPLIES 120143 WW GRAINGER INC 159.16 ELECTRIC PARTS 126144 GRAPHIC CONTROLS 149.9b INSTRUMENT PARTS T'EI 126145 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS SZ55.51 FILM X 126246 DON GREEM 1 ASSOCIATES 145y.Uu SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 2 126147 CHARLES 6 HARDY INC 1.OY.J1 BUILDING MATERIALS 128248 FRED A HARPER 11.5JG.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 12BI49 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLA5T1 1171.211 PIPE 128150 MATCH 6 MIRX INC 56.46 MGCHANICAL PARTS 12B 151 NAULAWAY CONTAINLNS 1810.O0 CONTAINER RENTALS w 120152 Pt. HAWN CO INC Sb05.6. FILTER 1 1281`--3 EG HELLER-S SON INC 599.11 TOOLS W 128154 HELLO S19l..5 COMMUNICATIONS 228155 HEWLETT PACKARD 1690.Ou SERVICE AGREEMENT 128156 HOME CONTROLS DIV/HOKE, INC. 1227.32 VALVES 128157 RS HUGHES CO INC $815.49 PAINT SUPPLIES 120158 HUNTER CORPORATION $349.972.50 CONSTRUCTION 0-19-1 128159 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $22.41 WATER USE 12016D HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER SIX 5165.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128161 HUNTINGTON SUFFLY 1i8.3b HARDWARE 126162 IDEA MAN. INC $372.36 PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS 128163 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL S7y..45.48 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 128164 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 1542.7O CONNECTORS 120165 INSET SYSTEMS 167.6d COMPUTER SOFTWARE 126266 INTEGRATED BUSINESS TNT. INC 14J414b OFFICE SUPPLIES 128167 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 11.639.56 BATTERIES 128160 IRVINE RANCH WATER UISTRILT 583.72 WATER USE 126169 JLA CREDIT CORP 1L.5.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 126170 JACK A CHANGE 11.426.7. FITTINGS 12U171 WILLIAM H JACKSON 1731.28 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF 128172 JANDEL SCIENTIFIC i]y2.G3 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 120273 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP. 13U9.37 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 12B174 JAYS CATERING S)43.3] DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES 128175 JENSEN TOOLS INC S]2.)3 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROLL"IM4 DATE 2/18/93 PAGE R 6LFORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COON TT CLAIMS PAID Ii/L9/93 PO4TING DAIL L2/24/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 128176 JEFFRIE MC KIM JOHNSON 5398.4L BUILDING REPAIRS 126177 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 5231.27 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 128178 JONES CHEMICALS INC 16U9.7L CHEMICALS 128179 JONES INDUSTRIAL HAROWARL C .547.97 ELECTRIC PARTS 128180 JOUAN. INC S1U8.67 LAB SUPPLIES 128182 KAMAN BEARINGS L SUPPLY .73.7C MECHANICAL PARTS 128102 KEENAN t ASSOCIATES s2.475.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128183 ALDEN KELLET CONSULTING .375.06 SITE INSPECTION - DIST 10 128164 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS SWb W.95 PUMP PARTS 128185 KIMANN LE S.16.51 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF 12818E KING BLARING INC S29J9b.57 MACHINE SUPPLIES 128187 RODA INDUSTRIAL SUFPLILS .3-8-36 TOOLS 126188 MARTIN KORUICM SR ".8...7, CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-9 128189 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO SIGO.16 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 128190 LAYNAH. JONES L DYE, LAWYERS 53.492.1E LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER INDUSTRIES 126191 LEGI-TECH s320.0. COMPUTER SERVICES ITT X 120192 LEE L RO CONSULTING CASA 115,772.55 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38-5 S 120193 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIPL INS. CU. 52.961.95 DEFERRED COMP TRANSFERS 126194 KP LINDSTROM INC S4.148.6L CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL C73 128195 LUSTRE-CAL S611.14 DECALS 128196 MPS 5116.73 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 128197 MACOMCO $524.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT 12819E NAG SYSTEMS a801.66 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES I� 128199 NAM LEY•S BOILER RLPAIR C4. INC 5Y1.901.14 BOILER RBPAIRB .� 128200 MARTIN 5538.33 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 126201 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 581.5E INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 126202 MATT - CNLOR INC 5636.1E CHLORINATION PARTS 12820 HEMBREA $357.7i LAB SUPPLIES 129204 MENSCO INC 43.725.15 BUILDING MATERIALS 1282C5 MESA VERDE COUNTRY CLUB s38i.7C5.46 EASEMENT 14-1-IA 12820E MIDWAY MFG t MACHINING 15.983.55 PUMP PARTS 128207 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL INC 5182.10 BOOKS 12b20B MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $327.243.60 CONSTRUCTION 2-30 126209 MONTROY SUPPLY CO SI40.71 SAFETY SUPPLIED 128210 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC 3348.31 BASIN PARTS 126211 NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK 59.5OC.64 COP REFUNDING CONSULTIMG DENO. 126212 NEWARK ELECTRONICS 5IC7.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS 128213 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $5.99 WATER USE 126224 OCB RLPROGRAPMICS INC S189.1G PRINTING 126215 DR SYSTEMS CO $14.761.56 CHLORINE M.0.30-9-91 128216 ORACLE CORPORATION 5561.2E COMPUTER SOFTWARE 121,e17 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO $1,833.83 CHEMICALS 126218 ORANGE COUNTY DIRECT MAIL 5168.i5 MAILING SERVICES 128219 ORANGE VALVE L PITTING CO. $451.24 FITTINGS 125220 OSCAR-S LOCK L SAFE 166.47 LOCKS 128221 OXYGEN SERVICE 51.185.71 SPECIALTY GASES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST NURKING CAPITAL FROCESSING DATE 2/lb/93 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID .2/2d93 PUS71MG DATE L2/24/91 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMUUNT DESCRIPTION 128222 COUNTY OF ORANGE $5.262.43 SERVICE AGREEMENT - MOBILE RADIOS 126223 COUNTY OF ORANGE S-782.G0 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 128224 COUNTY SANITATIuN DISTRICT $1,967.7, DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128225 COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICT $3.BUS.57 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT 12B22b PC SYSTEMS DESIGN $231.65 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 128227 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY .359.25 TOOLS 128229 PACIFIC PARTS 4138.43 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 128229 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT INC 13b8.:2 PUMP PARTS 128230 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIFMENT CO 12.455.10 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128231 PACIFIC BELL 15i.53 TELEPHONE SERVICES 128232 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 1924.19 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 12P233 PADRE JANITORIAL SUFP 11.3G5.b7 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 128234 PAGENET 116.66 PAGER RENTALS 128235 PALMIERI, TYLER. WIENER. 13.246.53 LEGAL SERVICES 14-1-IA 128236 PARKSON CORPORA71ON $6,731.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES - 12B23T PARTS UNLIMITED 11.219.59 TRUCK PARTS X 128230 ROY PENOERGRAF7 146u.0u DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION = 12b239 PERMIN-ELKER CORFORATION $711.85 LAB SUPPLIES 12 B240 PIMA GRU EYE TENS INC $173.680.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 - t" 128241 POLYMETRICS, INC. 5192.LJ SERVICE AGREEMENT 128242 POLYFURE INC $21.021.71 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 228243 POWER TRAIN INDUSTRIES 5356.47 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES UO 126244 MIKE PURLICH 6 SONS 167.500.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-35-2 1 228245 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1959.LT MECHANICAL PARTS 111 128246 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 14.960.uu INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 128217 PROTOTYPE INC 165.6. TRAINING REGISTRATION 128248 PULSAFEEDER Sb.314.5L PUMP PARTS 120249 QSI/LIFEKIT $3.314.76 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128250 QUESTRON CORP 1103.00 LAB SUPPLIES 128251 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO 1112.75 LAB SUPPLIES 128252 RECYC INC $321.7i RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 128253 REbAL RECUUN17ION 13.567.44 SERVICE AWARDS 128254 THE REGISTER A768.4u NOTICES 6 ADS 128255 REISH MARINE STUDIES. INC sb GG.UG OCEAN MONITORING 128256 MCJUNKIN-RCPUBLIC SUPPLY $14,214.91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 128257 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CURF $335.3. LAB SUPPLIES 120258 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL .1.976..7 INSTRUMENT PARTS 128259 PEbGY RUPP $540.06 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 120260 JOSEPH T RYERSON 6 SUN IN 12.585.1L METAL 126261 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 140u.54 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 128262 SANWA BANK 33b.300.4L CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30 128263 SARTORIUS CORP 1630.uO LAB SUPPLIES 128264 SCOTT SPECIALTY uASES INC 3..29 J.:b SAFETY SUPPLIES 120265 SECURITY SPECIALISTS 143D.05 OFFICE REPAIRS 128266 SHASTA ELECTRIC 19.A1.u6 ELECTRIC SERVICES 128267 SHURELUCK SALES 12,45L95 TRUCK PARTS ``r FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/18/93 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/.4/93 PUSTINS DATE Li/24/93 -WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126260 SILVERI 1 LE BOUEF $37,766.70 CONSTRUCTION 2-30 128269 SO COAST AIR QUALITY 155.9b1.67 PERMIT FEES 128270 SO CALIF EDISON CO A2.500.G6 METER 128271 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 1109.473.16 POWER 128272 SO CAL GAS CO $52.5L NATURAL GAS 128273 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CD I.b.141.81 DIESEL FUEL 128274 SOUTHWEST MATERIAL 1947.79 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 128275 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER Si..51.3i DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 128276 STAMEN 2 SFASSOFF FL - 4E.960.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-19-2 12927T SPEAKER SUPPORT 1251..5 PRESENTATION AIDS 128276 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTLMS INC 411.31 VALVE PARTS 128279 STERLING ART 11.039.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128260 STEVEN STOKICH $516.39 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF 128291 SUNSET FORD S105.59 TRUCK PARTS 128282 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1340.G4 FITTINGS 128293 THORPE INSULATION S4b.74 PIPE SUPPLIES m 120284 TONY•S LOCK A SAFE SERVICE $02.62 LOCKS 6 KEYS X 128205 TUVO LANUSCAPIN6 CO 54.172.37 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING H.0.11-13-91 = 126286 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES 55.782.UL TRAVEL SERVICES 1262B7 TRIPLITE 1700.04 INSTRUMENT PARTS 128288 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY INC 1175.34 TRUCK PARTS 128289 JG TUCKER ■ SON INC S..2b T.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS 128290 TUSTIN DOOGE 5641.00 TRUCK PARTS 12b291 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1253.ib PARCEL SERVICES 128292 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP $1.154.00 SERVICE NUMBERS" 128293 MARK D SOBSLT 5.9.393.5E OCEAN MONITORING 120294 VUR SCIENTIFIC A1.384.44 LAB SUPPLIES 128295 VALLEY CITICS SUPPLY CO $1,396.05 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 120296 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL 14.GD2.02 MACHINE REPAIRS 128297 VAN NOSTRAHD REINHOLD 4314.51 BOOKS 128298 VANIER bUSINESS FORMS S7b.6, PRINTING 128299 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $985.87 LAB SUPPLIES 128300 VERNE-S PLUMBING ♦262.13 PLUMBING PARTS 128301 VISUAL PLANNING SYSTEMS 3489.34 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 128-02 UEMAC DIV OF PURITAN-SENNETT 5140.LU USER PER OVERPAYMENT 128E03 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY Si5.442.67 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92 128304 RUSSELL WILD L..I.b9 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128305 ROURKE S WOODRUFF G OR $05,803.57 LROAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 128306 AEROX CORP 5129.3b COPIER LEASES 128307 GEORGE YARDLEY CO bb17.20 VALUES 128308 YORK INTERNATIONAL 1598.31 ELECTRIC PARTS 126309 RICHARD a EU6AR 42JO.60 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID C2/24/93 $2.649.624.eb FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/18/93 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 02/24/93 POSTING DATE 02/24/93 SUMMARY AMOUNT R1 CAP FAC FUND $1,178.72 R2 OPER FOND r $3,886.43 #2 CAP FAC FUND $372,835.00 R3 OPER FUND $22,064.58 85 OPER FUND $5,046.37 05 CAP FAC FOND $69,484.99 #6 OPER FUND $278.43 N7 OPER FUND 44,D65.30 R7 CAP FAC FUND $60,855.48 411 OPER FUND $1,254.46 813 OPEN FUND $46.19 R14 OPER FUND $78.25 R14 CAP FAC FUND $393,937.16 Xq5&6 OPER FUND $53.48 = R5&6 CAP FAC FUND $26,415.88 R7&14 OPER FUND $262.69 ~W JT OPER FUND $981,009.32 COST - $597,536.86 --4 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $21,008.03 CO JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FOND $188,527.46 -------------- V $2,649,629 88 ' 04/14/93 JOINT BOARD MEETING ffA - Received and filed minute excerpts. ##a - JOINT CHAIRMAN'S REPORT The first item is to bring Director Bill Steiner to the front please. Welcome aboard, Bill. As we always do, we give our new members a pin recognizing their membership. It's like Rotary, if you don't wear it, we fine you. Congratulations. For reports, the Fiscal Policy Committee is to meet on Wednesday, April 21 st, at 5:30 p.m. Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee is to meet on Tuesday, April 27th, at 11:30 a.m. at SCAQMD offices in Diamond Bar. WEDAA: Lunch will be served. Executive Committee is to meet on Wednesday, April 28th, at 5:30 p.m. I would like to invite Barry Hammond and Frank Laszlo. Can you gentlemen be at the Executive Committee meeting? Frank responded yes and Barry Hammond was to call staff and let them know whether he can attend or not. Personnel Committee is schedule to meet on Thursday, April 29th, at 5:30 p.m. #4b - GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT I have no special report. I would like to ask the new Directors; we are still trying to put together a second orientation and treatment plant tour for those not able to attend the first one. You have in your folders tonight a pink sheet with some optional dates. I would appreciate it if you would fill it out and either leave it in your folder or leave it with Clerk. Staff will have some additional reports on various agenda items later in the evening. PONTIOUS: She responded that she would like to attend the next orientation and treatment plant tour. All Directors were invited by the JC to attend the next orientation. Once the date is set staff will notify all the Directors. #4c - GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT For the Directors in District No. 6, later in the agenda there is going to be a closed session and at that time we will be asking District No. 6 to take up an action regarding an enforcement action from the Source Control Division relating to an industrial permittee to review and act at that time. #7 - MINUTE EXCERPTS STEINER - Abstained from approving 3/10/93 minutes for District Nos. 5, 6, 7, 13 �..i and 44. #8 - WARRANT ROLL CALL Motion carried. #9d - CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 , JOB NO. J-19-1 COLLINS: As you know I have been concerned about change orders for a couple of years. My concern has been generally in the frequency of the use and amount of money that they demand. More specifically my concern is that these Districts may be paying for the inefficiency or inadequacy of design engineers or contractors. I've also had some concern regarding the proper use or the intended use of some of change orders. I talk to Tom Dawes on a monthly basis to review these things. I believe that after meeting with Tom and discussing alot of these items that in most cases when the change order is properly identified in fitting the parameters of the recoverable cost items situated at the ------ Staff has pursued and ---- the proper monies from either the design engineers or the contractors. However, there is still trouble in some areas of change orders that I believe demand our attention in more specific ways. When a design engineer is not proficient in this work, the inadequacy of his effort is reflected in the contract document and may not be discovered until after the job is well underway. Cost to provide for the omitted work may not be any higher at this time than compared when the contract document was budgeted. So we approve the change order in the ---- days if necessary. But there really is incremental costs to the Districts. Our staff has to deal with the item. The contractor has to spend time dealing with the inadequacy of the design engineer and maybe some of that gets figured back in when we have to renegotiate more time for that project and renegotiate a higher cost for that contractor. Unfortunately, these costs are difficult to quantify and have been sighted. The costs may --------- but they are difficult to ------- Item 9(d) has a case in point. Item 5 specifies we are ask to pay $3,300.00 for controls not specifically defined in the contract documents. Item 7, connections not shown in the contract document. Item 9, conduit wiring not shown in the contract document. Item 10, this work not shown in the contract document. Item 11, items incorrectly shown on the contract documents. Item 12, conflict with adjacent piping systems shown in the contract document. The contractor is not at fault; the contractor is fixing the work and we should not delay the project. However, I would like to recommend a couple of steps. I would like the minutes tonight to show that many of these requests in this item appear to be caused by the design engineer who in this case is Brown and Caldwell. I would like for staff to include the name of the design engineer in change orders when that change order request are caused by that design engineer. I would also like to ask staff to develop a point system to reflect design engineers competency levels. Then when this point system is put together and examined over a period of time I .... would like to stop using design engineering firms that demonstrate inefficiency in inadequate levels of service. The low bidder may not always be the least expensive. Mr. Chairman, I would like to move item #9(d) for the specific recommendation that Brown and Caldwell's name be shown in the minutes as the design engineer for this project. JC: We have a motion and a second to approve the item with Brown and Caldwell's name reflected in the minutes. Deemed approved. #11 a. b - ITEMS RECOMMENDED BY THE FISCAL POLICY AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE'S //-- STANTON: Abstaining from all of item #11 . Ct 1 S #11b - MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER AND FERDON FOR ADDITIONAL FEES FOR SPECIAL CO-BOND COUNSEL SERVICES GULLIXSON: Mr. Chairman on 11(b)(1) I would like to move the approval of the Fiscal Policy Committee recommendation to pay $110,000.00. JC: There is a motion and a second to approve the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation of $110,000.00. For those who are familiar with this, the Executive Committee reviewed the matter based on the Fiscal Policy Committee's recommendation and the Executive Committee recommended $150,000.00. So it's on the table in discussion, we now have a motion for the $110,000.00 recommended by the FPC. I want to make clear that we are not approving what the Executive Committee did. We have a motion and a second. Is there any further discussion? On the advice of General Counsel we are going to hold this matter to Executive session rather than discussing here. I think there are some things that need to be discussed and revealed to the Board and as a result of that we will not act on this at the current time. We will discuss this in closed session and we will reconvene after closed session to take action so it is in fact done publicly. #11 b2 - INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT POLICY AND RESERVE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS GORCZYCA: During the last couple of months, the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committees have recommended revising the investment management program which would implement a reverse repurchase agreement. That approval has been �.i subject to resolution of any certain legal issues ---- to the other Treasurer functions. This program is expected to earn approximately $1.2 million annually . The proposal before you involves the appointment of a separate Districts Treasurer and the continuance of the County's providing other Treasurer functions to that District. As a way of background, the County Treasurer performs other banking and investment services to the Districts and has since our inception. General Counsel and County Counsel have agreed that the County Treasurer would not be impaired from continuing to provide both services should the Districts decide to appoint a separate Treasurer. Those services could be provided under a simple agreement between the Districts and the County, but the County Treasurer expressed that he would be obligated to charge us a fees for those services since he would no longer be providing all of the Treasurer functions to the Districts. Preceding negotiations of that fee, the County Treasurer has offered another alternative for your consideration. The County Treasurer has offered to make the reverse repurchase agreement on behalf of the Districts for a $200 flat fee per transaction. The County Treasurer's alternative proposal to the Districts is perhaps the best of all worlds. It supports the financial goal of the program and that is to achieve a greater yield on our cash reserves but it actually reduces the costs of the program to us. If a separate Districts' Treasurer were to perform the services as previously discussed for the program, the Districts would incur the cost of custodial banking services. It has always staffs intent to implement the program in cooperation with the County to tap the established experience of Bob Citron for this program. Additionally, the Districts would retain all Treasurer functions as currently provided by the County Treasurer at no charge. The basic difference is that if the Districts were to appoint a separate Treasurer, we would "direct" rather than "request" the reverse repurchase investments and would need to negotiate a fee for the other Treasurer services that would be amenable to the Districts and the County. So based on the County's alternative proposal to us, the Joint Boards now have the following action alternatives: 1 . Approve the original proposal providing for the appointment of a separate Districts' Treasurer and dealer to manage the reverse repurchase program as set forth under Agenda Items 11(b)(2)(a-f). or 2. Approve the County Treasurer's proposed alternative reverse repurchase program by taking the following actions: (a) Consideration of motion confirming the County Treasurer as the Districts' Treasurer and authorizing the County Treasurer upon request by the Districts' financial staff, to make reverse repurchase `..� investments in U.S. Treasuries securities of a maximum amount of $50 million, not to exceed ten-year maturities, and that payment of those securities be made by reversing the securities against themselves; and authorizing payment to the County Treasurer of a flat $200 fee per transaction; and authorizing the General Manger to confirm in writing with the County Treasurer on behalf of the Districts, this action of the Boards. (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to lease the Bloomberg financial reporting system to provide financial market monitoring to aid staff in administering the reverse repurchase and other Districts' financial programs. Staff recommends Alternative 2. PUCKETT: As Chairman of the Fiscal Policy Committee, I think this is ----------- recommendation and I move. JC: We have a motion and a second. Before we vote on this, I would like to point out, I was very impressed with reading this. We've had discussions in FPC's and Executive Committee's in regards to the reverse repurchase arrangements and one of the things that hit me is if you will look at page 2 from the letter from Bob Citron. He indicates that the very end of the second paragraph, "The Orange County Treasurer currently has over $900 million securities reversed against themselves" exactly like we are doing it. It is obviously something that many of us have discussed, what is this and is it something that is used. Here Citron is doing It himself and that is basically how Bob does such a good job. We are not doing anything unique here and as a matter of fact 1 really do think it is a good deal that Citron is going to do this for us, uniquely, for $200 a pop. It is really a good deal. I think it is certainly the way to go. Any further comments or discussion? CATLIN: I brought up some issues on this a while back because when it first came out -------------- After considering the two points that we had concerns with; one being risk and one being a moral issue. ----------- We do have reservations over this type of thing on Bob Citron's page 2 where he talks about the negative side. There are risks ------- so what I am going to do is abstain from this because the City of Fullerton ----------------- I see nothing for what it is doing -------- Our financial department -------- going into the risk area so I will abstain. JC: The record will so reflect we have one abstention on this matter. We do have a motion and a second. Is there any further comments or discussion? Stanton: Two abstentions. JC: We have two abstentions, Director Catlin and Director Stanton. Are there any others? Seeing none, is there any opposition to the motion? Thank you, it will be deemed approved. That was recommendation number 2. 1188 - REPAIRS AND MODIFICATIONS TO FLARES AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2, SPECIFICATION NO. R-040 TMD: Item 18 is a request for authority to issue a purchase order to Sur-Lite in the amount of $129,400. About a month ago we did some testing on two of our six digester gas flares. We tested one at each plant and we found the flares to be in non-compliance with our AQMD permits. We notified the South Coast Air District immediately within the sixty minutes that we are required to do so. They granted us a variance after a formal request for thirty days to fix those two flares. We did that and emergency staff authority and we fixed them, tested them and they are `J now operating within the limits imposed by the District. I might add that they weren't out of compliance by very much. They were very, very close but they were out of compliance. The compliance on these flares runs about six or seven parts per million ------- It's a very low compliance requirement, however, the other four flares we believe also need repair. After we fixed those two and placed them back in service, we started an inspection of the other four and we believe they have to be repaired. The repairs consist of replacing burners which actually melted down and to change certain controls which will change the air mix with the digester gas and the amount of digester gas and temperatures that will burn that. We are planning on asking AQMD tomorrow morning, we are going before the hearing board for a second variance to fix the other four, if you so approve this request. The maximum amount that we would is the $129,000 requested. It may be that some of the old burners will not have to be replaced as we get into them and so the amount would be less. We are also asking for the authority to hire the burner manufacturer to do monthly inspections of these while they are in operation for up to two years. We do expect to take them out of service before that as Central Gen is brought on line and we use all that digester gas and we won't be burning it in these flares. The `....� recommended action is to authorize the General Manager to issue that purchase order so that we can proceed with the upgrading and repair of our flares. JC: Thank you, Tom. Questions of staff? COLLINS: It mentions in here that we have increased the temperatures of the running of these and it also says that other controls and changes made by the Districts have contributed to the problems. Have we identified what those other control changes are and the result? Ti We believe we have. We did make the repairs on the other two and we made certain changes in the controls. We were running the flares hotter than required by AQMD. AQMD has an exit from the top of the flare requirement of 1400 degrees. We ran them about 1550 degrees to make sure that we wouldn't get below that 1400. There is alot of variance in these flares. In doing so, we believe we may have increased the temperature far greater than that and the burner level. We believe we have made the necessary adjustments so we can run these flares about 1500. We still want to be over the 1400 and not do further damage to those burners. COLLINS: So the other changes referred in here are changes at the burner level ---- ----? Ti All the changes are at the burner level. PICKLER: Is it possible that instead of every month you could inspect these quarterly? TMD: Yes, sir. We believe that as soon as the Central Gen's are on-line we won't have to use these flares and we won't be inspecting them but quarterly or less than that. We just want to be able to have the inspections going while they are still in use. Hopefully by July Central Gen will be in full operation. JC: Further questions from staff? We have a motion and a second to approve. Is there any further discussion? Abstentions? Oppositions? Seeing none, it will be deemed approved. #35 - Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments JC: We have a motion and a second to approve, is that correct to approve the recommendation? I think what I'd like to have you do is have General Counsel make some comments before we do that. I thought we would have some discussion before we had the item moved. Let's have a report from General Counsel. TLW: This is not the first time a request of this nature has been presented to the Districts. There have been similar requests not only in District 3 but several of the other Districts as well. I would point out to you a couple of things that are certainly very important from a legal perspective. One, being that the request here is to reduce the sewer connection fees. Sewer connection fees are established by ordinance that are adopted after a variety of procedural requirements are satisfied - notice and hearings and then the ordinances are adopted. Our ordinance has no provision for the waiver or modification of any fees. The ordinances says this is the fee - period. In order to effectively accomplish this, if this is the direction of the Board, what would have to happen is we would have to process an ordinance amendment and have hearings and process it to set forth an amendment which would then necessarily include alot of various findings that would have to be made to justify it. There is a second point that I feel obligated to bring before the Board. I went back through my files to a 1979 opinion to the Board of Directors of District 2 on this very issue on a request for a connection fee waiver for a senior citizen housing project. I set forth in that opinion which I reaffirmed with the District 3 Directors tonight the point that I just made and secondly that there is an issue. In the 1970's and early of the 1980's, the Districts did receive certain grant monies under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Clean Air Act and its grant program which is no longer in existence. But we got many millions of dollars for the building of facilities both here at Plant 1 and Plant 2. One of the statutory requirements under federal law was that we had to adopt a very comprehensive revenue program. One component of that was that there be a established a uniform, fair and equitable levy of charges and assessments and that all parties must pay on a fair and equitable basis. While it may in fact be somewhat theoretical I would caution that a legal argument can be made that if in fact property owner "x" is allowed to pay a lesser fee than all other property owners that it runs afoul of the federal regulations and could in theory, the federal government could come back and audit and say "you have now no further compliance with your revenue program in that you have a disproportionate and an unequal levy assessment of fees". I've heard of instances across the country on this where it has been challenged periodically. I really don't know whether EPA has ever done anything about enforcing it to the point of actually taking the money back from the local agency but I would be remiss if I didn't at least point that out. At least in theory that argument can be made. The major point is that we would have to consider the ordinance as an amendment. As it stands now, there is simply no legal authority to grant waiver. SAPIEN: ------ reclassify the project commercial rather than residential? TLW: I guess I have two points on that. I think that the Directors would have to realistically look at the true facts and see if they could justify such a finding. We had a very identical situation in District 5 about three years where there was a dispute. It was a congregate care senior citizen facility, not a low cost one. There was a legal argument. They threatened to sue the District on that very point; that it was commercial and not residential. We advised the District and we got into alot of argument without a law suit with the developer. They finally backed off and agreed that yes they couldn't make the case, that it really was commercial. District 5 refused to accept that premise and would not waive the fees. I think that it is very tenuous to think that we could make adequate findings of fact �..i that say a housing project really is commercial. I know that the arguments that can be brought up by the developers because I have seen them in writing. I've seen them in South County and in Newport Beach in the case I just shown as an example. They say this is really commercial, we really aren't in it for the good of people living in those apartments, we're just in it for the money. That sounds kind of crass but if you are trying to make your point, you may have to take a moment and be somewhat crass in your argument. In theory every development is a commercial venture for somebody and that. be the developer. I would be very troubled trying to make those findings frankly. PICKLER: My question is on Jan Development? Aren't they the ones that will pick up the tab? (End of tape) r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 29 3, 5, 6, 79 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON APRIL 14, 1993 0iTATtON _., 6 tavclimn O.va�ST N 44F Si... 195A O'99'VGE COUNT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, B. 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on April 14. 1993, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 5, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: , ACTIYE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS I-xvi" DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. l: . Robert Richardson, Chairman _.Thomas E. Lutz I x Fred Barters,Chairman pro tam Gene Beyer James M.Ferryman Nate Reeds Thomas R. Salterelli UsHe Pontious i Roger Stanton Wiliam G. Stainer DISTRICT NO.2: Henry W.Worries, Chairman Jahn M.GNlisson John Collins, Chairman pro tam George Scot, Fred Somers Gene Beyer x Bob Beg Barry Denes _ Buck Catlin Molly McClanahan William 0.Mahoney James H. Flora Maria Moreno Norman Z.Eckenrode Carrey J.Nelson Glerm Parker In,fickler Tom Daly _ Miguel Potido Thomas E.l uv i Roger Stanton William G.Steller a_ George L Baker Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO. 3: Sal A Sapim. Chairman Don Monies _ Bumie Dunap, Chairman pro tam x Carrey J.Nelson Buck Ceram Molly McClanahan John Collins George Scott X James V.Evans Margie L. Rice y_ James H.Flora William D.Mahoney Don R.Griffin Arthur We. x Gail Nang Cecilia L Age x Frank Lasalo Gwen A. Forsythe s_ Thomas E. Lut, Robert Richardson Eva G. Miner Wally Lim Iry fickler Tom Daly Jim Silva Ease Robitaille Sheldon Singer George L. Zlaket Roger Stanton William G.Steiner x Charles Sylvia Ronald Bates DISTRICT NO.S: i John C. Cos. Jr., Chairman Jan Delay y_ firil same. _ Jan Debay William G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: James A.Wahnm, Chairman Anna Perry Evelyn Han,Chairman We tam John C. Cps,Jr. William G. Steiner _ Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: i Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Thomas R. Saltarelli James A.Warmer, Chairman pro tam Mike Scheeler Fred Barren Gene Beyer i Jan Debav Wail Sansone Barry Hammond Mike Word Ted Mores Miguel Niel. x Wllam G. Stainer Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Wncholl, Chairman Earle Robiaille L Visor Wpm ,Chairman pro tem Jim Siva X Roger Stanton Wlliam G. Steiner DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M.Gullixem, Chairman Henry W.Wedaa Fred genera,Chairman pro tam Gene Beyer Glenn Parker Bumie Dunlap x In,fickler Tom Daly William G. Steiner Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: Peer A.Swan,Chairman Darryl Miller \`i a Leslie Pontious, Chairman pro tam Charles E. Puckett i Fred Garton Gene Beyer Bath HammaM Mike Ward William G.Show _ Roger Stanton —2— 04/14/93 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manger, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Susan Bradford, Chris Cervellone, Corinne Clawson, Patti Gorczyca, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Margie Nellor, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, ° Mary Simpson, Ed Torres, Chuck Winsor, Ray Young OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Edward Czuker, Harvey Hunt, Bill Knopf, Jim Parker, Phil Stone ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file resolution of the Board of Supervisors re change in That Resolution No. 93-252 from the Board appointment of active and alternate of Supervisors re change in appointment of representatives active and alternate representatives, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: Districts Active Director Alternate Director 1,2,3 & 11 Roger R. Stanton William G. Steiner 5,6,7,13 & 14 William G. Steiner Roger R. Stanton �✓ ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed recently Presentation of Districts' pin to new seated Director William Steiner to the Boards Director and presented him with a pin bearing the Districts' logo. The pin is similar to the service pins given to employees and recognize the Directors for their service on the Boards of the Sanitation Districts. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the Report of the Joint Chairman tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, April 21st, at 5:30 p.m. Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee - Tuesday, April 27th, at 11 :30 a.m., at the South Coast Air Quality Management District offices in Diamond Bar Executive Committee - Wednesday, April 28th, at 5:30 p.m. (Directors Barry Hammond and Frank Laszlo were also invited to attend.) Personnel Committee - Thursday, April 29th, at 5:30 p.m. -3- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager stated that he was Report of the General Manager trying to schedule a second tour for the new Directors who were unable to attend the orientation and treatment plant tour held on January 30th. He requested those Directors to complete and turn in to the Board Secretary a form included in their ` folders indicating alternative dates. Mr. Sylvester stated that once the tour date was set, all Directors would be notified and are encouraged to attend. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held ...� March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -4- 04/14/93 DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. , Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 03/10/93 03/24/93 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 677,448.08 $977,467.70 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,421,117.67 765,184.02 Joint Working Capital Fund - 179,797.23 483,815.16 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 1,988.14 219,122.16 DISTRICT NO. 1 - .00 58,477.70 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 332,769.99 35,648.62 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 301,248.87 13,380.71 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 83,994.99 8,750.59 DISTRICT NO. 6 - .00 29.51 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 40,098.12 11,147.61 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 1,149.30 5,275.06 DISTRICT NO. 13 - .00 .00 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 929.85 45,943.50 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 23,221 .93 3,218.68 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,303.10 .00 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 7,747.69 .00 $3.073.814.96 $2.627 461.02 -5- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of One Steam Sterilizer Unit (Autoclave). That the bid tabulation and recommendation Specification No. E-226 (Revised) to re award of Purchase of One Steam Sterilizer Amsco Scientific. Division of Unit (Autoclave), Specification No. E-226 i American Sterilizer Company (Revised), be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Amsco Scientific, Division of American Sterilizer Company, for a total amount not to exceed $27,145.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Hewlett-Packard for Purchase That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to of Gas Chromatograph/Mass issue a purchase order to Hewlett-Packard Spectrometer System, Specification Company in the amount of $62,000.00, No. E-228 plus tax and freight, for Purchase of Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer System, Specification No. E-228. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and Nos. 1-9 and J-22-2 specifications for Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. 1-9, and Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-22-2, authorizing an addition of $83,741 .00 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich and Sons, for three items of additional work, granting a time extension of 14 calendar days for completion of said additional work, and one item pertaining to a contract- authorized sales tax adjustment, and one other contract adjustment, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Director Collins stated that he believed many Approving Change Order No 20 of the items in change orders for this project to the plans and specifications for and others are a result of inefficiencies or Job No. J-19-1 inadequacies of the design engineer and cited examples in Change Order No. 20. He observed that although the change order cost for omitted work may not be any more than would have been paid if included in the original bid, he was concerned that there may be other incidental costs. He also noted that the contractor should not be penalized or the work delayed because of these deficiencies. He asked that staff include the name of the design engineer in the change orders and develop a system to rate design engineers' proficiency to be considered in future work. Director Collins then moved approval of Change Order No. 20 with the specific recommendation that the design engineer's name be shown in the minutes for this project. -6- 04/14/93 It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 20 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, designed by Brown and `..✓ Caldwell, authorizing an addition of $53,586.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for 12 items of additional work or other contract adjustments, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is Professional Services Agreement with hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum John Carollo Engineers for design and No. 2 to the Professional Services construction services. preparation Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for of operations and maintenance design and construction services, manuals, and trainino services for preparation of operations and maintenance Job Nos. P1-36 and P2-42 manuals, and training services re Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, to change the scope of work and to provide for additional design services to investigate new technology for modifications to enhance advanced treatment effectiveness and efficiency and provide operational flexibility and reliability. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a That the Selection Committee be, and is 1 , Professional Services Agreement for hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and `••,✓ Job Nos. Pi-46 and P2-55 negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for engineering evaluation and design and construction support services required for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill for design That the Selection Committee certification and oroarammina services for Job of the final negotiated fee relative to the No. J-31 Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill for design and programming services required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-37, approving said agreement with CH2M Hill for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $690,148.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -7- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo That the Selection Committee certification Engineers to prepare glans and of the final negotiated fee relative to the �.J specifications and to provide Professional Services Agreement with John construction support services for Job Carollo Engineers to prepare plans and Nos. J-33 and J-34 specifications and to provide construction support services for Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-38, approving said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $950,252.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committee Committee's meeting and Executive Committee's meeting held on March 17, 1993 and March 24, 1993, respectively, be and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Discussion re Investment Management Policy and Proposed Reserve Repurchase Investment Program Verbal report of staff The Districts' Financial Manager, Patti Gorczyca, reported that the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committees are recommending revisions to the Districts' investment management policy to implement provisions for reverse repurchase transactions, subject to satisfactory resolution of any questions by the Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector (County Treasurer) pertaining to banking services provided by his office on behalf of the Districts. Based on recent performance of the securities market, the Districts could expect to earn approximately $1 .2 million annually from this program. The proposal provides that the Districts would appoint a separate Treasurer and dealer to manage the program, and the County Treasurer would continue to provide other Treasury and investment services as in the past. -8- 04/14/93 The office of County Counsel has reviewed the March 23, 1993, letter from the General Counsel (included in the Directors' original April 14 agenda package), which concluded that the Districts are empowered to appoint their own Treasurer, who could be a person other than the County Treasurer, and that there are no prohibitions or restrictions imposed on either the County Treasurer or the Districts relating to the ability of the Districts to transfer their funds to the County Treasury for purposes of deposit and investment, or for the County to provide other Treasury services. County Counsel has concurred with General Counsel's opinion. , Ms. Gorczyca further reported that the County Treasurer performs other banking and investment services for the Districts and has since our inception. General Counsel and County Counsel agreed that the County Treasurer would not be impaired from continuing to provide both services should the Districts decide to appoint a separate Treasurer. Those services could be provided under a simple agreement between the Districts and the County, but the County Treasurer expressed that he would be obligated to charge a fee for these services as he would no longer be performing all of the Treasurer functions. The County Treasurer has not yet determined an appropriate charge, but has offered the Districts another alternative for consideration. Ms. Gorczyca reported that since the Executive Committee meeting, the County Treasurer has offered to make the reverse repurchase investments on behalf of the Districts for a $200 flat fee per transaction and referred Directors to a letter dated April 12, 1993, from Robert L. Citron, included in their meeting folders. The County Treasurer's alternative proposal provides the Districts with perhaps the best of both worlds. It supports the financial goal of the Districts' reverse repurchase program, since it does allow us to achieve the same improved yield on cash reserves as anticipated, and actually reduces the costs of the program. If a separate Districts' Treasurer were to engage in reverse repurchases, the Districts would incur costs of custodial bank services considerably in excess of the $200 flat fee. Also, it has always been the Districts' intent to carry out the reverse repurchase program in partnership with the County Treasurer in order to tap the established expertise of Bob Citron. Additionally, the Districts would retain the benefit of all the Treasury services as currently provided by the County Treasurer at no charge. The basic difference is that if the Districts were to appoint a separate Treasurer, we would "direct" rather than "request" the reverse repurchase investments and would need to negotiate a fee for other banking services amenable to both the County Treasurer and Districts. The Financial Manager advised the Board Members that based on the County Treasurer's alternative proposal, if the Directors wished to proceed with the reverse repurchase program, the Joint Boards now had the option of either approving the original proposal providing for the appointment of a separate Districts' Treasurer and dealer to manage the reverse repurchase program, or approving the County Treasurer's proposed alternative reverse repurchase program. -9- 04/14/93 Following a brief discussion, the following action was taken. Authorizing the County Treasurer to make reverse �..' repurchase investments on behalf of the Districts Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the County Treasurer be, and is hereby, confirmed as the Districts' Treasurer; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the County Treasurer be, and is hereby, authorized, upon request by the Districts' financial staff, to make reverse repurchase investments in U.S. Treasuries securities of a maximum amount of $50 million, not to exceed ten-year maturities, and that payment of those securities be made by reversing the securities against themselves; and authorizing payment to the County Treasurer of a $200 flat fee per transaction; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to confirm in writing with the County Treasurer, on behalf of the Districts, this action of the Boards. Directors A. B. Catlin and Roger R. Stanton requested that their abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizing lease of Bloomberg financial reporting system Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to lease the Bloomberg financial reporting system to provide financial market monitoring to aid staff in administering the reverse repurchase and other Districts' financial programs. Directors A. B. Catlin and Roger Stanton requested that their abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -10- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Fixed Floating Interest Rate Swap (1993 SWAP) Authorizing staff to proceed �a.✓ with preliminary 1993 SWAP structuring. utilizing underwriters Merrill Lynch and Paine Webber Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to proceed with preliminary 1993 SWAP structuring, utilizing underwriters Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber on a fee contingency basis, subject to final authorization by the Boards to conduct the transaction. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Directing staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, directed to submit a list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services for the 1993 SWAP for consideration by the Boards. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Standard and Poor's Rating Agency for review of 1993 SWAP structures Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Standard and Poor's Rating Agency for review of 1993 SWAP structures in an amount not to exceed $30,000. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record -11- 04/14/93 Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Moody's Rating Agency for review of 1993 SWAP structures Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Moody's Rating Agency for review of 1993 SWAP structures in an amount not to exceed $30,000. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Advanced Refunding Certificates of Participation. 1993 Series I Authorizing staff and Merrill Lynch to proceed with preliminary steps necessary to structure and bring to market the 1993 Series I Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and Merrill Lynch be, and are hereby, authorized to proceed with preliminary steps necessary to structure and bring to market the 1993 Series I, on a fee contingency basis, subject to final authorization by the Boards to conduct the transaction. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizing staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized to submit a list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services for the 1993 Series I for consideration by the Boards. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. 12 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS �..✓ Actions re Course of Construction Master Program Directing staff and Robert F. , Driver Company to implement the Master Course of Construction Proaram Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff and Robert F. Driver Company be, and are hereby, directed to implement the Master Course of Construction Program. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Appointing Zurich Insurance Company as the insurance carrier for the Master Course of Construction Program Moved, seconded and duly carried: �...� That Zurich Insurance Company be, and is hereby, appointed as the insurance carrier for the Master Course of Construction Program, at an estimated annual premium not to exceed $125,625.00 in accordance with terms summarized below: -13- 04/14/U3 PREMIUM RATE: $.125 per $100 per year LIMITS: $45,000,000 per Occurrence Sublimits: Earthquake: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate Flood: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence and Annual Aggregate Transit: $500,000 Offsite Storage: $500,000 Debris Removal: $5,000,000 Expediting Expense: $250,000 �.,.� Extra Expense: $1,000,000 DEDUCTIBLES: All Other Perils: $10,000 Flood: $50,000 Earthquake: 5% of values at risk at time of loss subject to $100,000 minimum. TOTAL INSURABLE VALUES: $100,500,000 Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -14- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Biofiltration Demonstration Proiect amending November 18, 1992 actions �a✓ Authorizina the General Manager to execute a grant agreement with the Southern California Edison Company for partial funding Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manger be, and is hereby, authorized to execute a grant agreement with the Southern California Edison Company for partial funding of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project in the amount of $50,000.00. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizing the General Manager to execute a specific-term emplovment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute a specific-term employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services for the Biofiltration Demonstration Project for up to a twelve-month period, at an hourly rate of $21.63 per hour, for a maximum amount not to exceed $45,000.00. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. Authorizing staff to proceed with the Biofiltration Demonstration Proiect Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to proceed with the Biofiltration Demonstration Project. Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. -15- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and alborove written report of the Building Committee That the written report of the Building Committee's meeting held on March 18, .J 1993, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving plans and specifications for Specification No. M-044 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-41, approving plans and specifications for Office Trailer Relocation at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve the written report of the Conservation. Recycle That the written report of the Conservation, and Reuse Committee Recycle and Reuse Committee's meeting held on March 25, 1993, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to complete negotiations for an agreement with That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to the OCWD providing up to complete negotiations for an agreement with `...� 50 mod of secondary effluent to the the OCWD, in form approved by General OCWD for recycling purposes Counsel, that would provide up to 50 mgd of secondary effluent to the OCWD for recycling purposes at no charge, with a provision to, at any time, reevaluate the valuation and pricing for secondary effluent; and to provide for purchase of GAP water for 20 years at the audited cost to operate and maintain the GAP facility. The contract would provide that the Districts' cost would not exceed the 0&M cost or the lowest cost of any GAP customer, whichever is less. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to execute an agreement with OCWD for pilot plant That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to testing of UV light disinfection execute an agreement with OCWD for pilot technology plant testing of UV light disinfection technology, with estimated $160,000 costs to be shared equally in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the Districts' portion of out-of-pocket costs for outside consulting services, and $40,000 for the Districts' in-house laboratory services. -16- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-2 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-42-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, clarifying miscellaneous mechanical and electrical items, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-42-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, making miscellaneous clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-42-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications, making changes to the General and Special Provisions re Insurance Requirements, be, and is hereby approved. Awarding Job No. P2-42-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-42, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, to Margate Construction, Inc., in the total amount of $14,496,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -17- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1 Approving Addendum No. 1 to plans and specifications for Job No. P2-43-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, changing the bid date and establishing a date and time for job walk, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-43-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is J hereby, approved. Awarding Job No. P2-43-1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-43, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount of $3,398,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive file and approve written report of the Special Joint Works That the written report of the Special Joint Selection Committee re Computers Works Selection Committee re Computers' meeting held on March 30, 1993, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -18- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving the three-phase approach for the Computerized Facilities That the three-phase approach for the Records and Drawings Systems. Computerized Facilities Records and Job No. J-25-1 Drawings Systems, Job No. J-25-1, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That preceding with implementation of three-phase approach, , be, and is hereby, authorized. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Special Selection Committee Re Computers to solicit That the Special Selection Committee Re proposals and negotiate Professional_ Computers be, and is hereby, authorized to Services Contracts) solicit proposals and negotiate Professional Services Contract(s) for the phased approached for consideration by the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors of General Counsel's Comments Prior to the need for a closed session as authorized Closed Session by Government Code Section 54956.9 to review: 1) Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to the co-generation internal combustion engines. �..� 2) Review of claim filed by Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, Attorneys at Law and receive recommendation of General Counsel re possible litigation. 3) Review and consideration of possible settlement of enforcement action initiated by Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at 6:30 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 9:50 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. -19- 04/14/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Denvina claim of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon for additional That the claim of Mudge Rose Guthrie fees for special Co-Bond Counsel Alexander and Ferdon for additional fees for services re Advance Refunding special Co-Bond Counsel services re Certificates of Participation. Advance Refunding Certificates of 1992 Series Participation, 1992 Series, be, and is hereby, respectively denied. Director Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a matter of record. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Settlement Agreement with Velie Circuits pertaining to That the proposed Settlement Agreement Enforcement Action re Industrial with Velie Circuits pertaining to Enforcement Waste Permit No. 6-1-144 Action re Industrial Waste Permit No. 6-1-144, as recommended by staff and General Counsel, be, and is hereby, approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager is hereby authorized to execute said agreement, in form approved by General Counsel. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Repairs and Modifications Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Specification No. R-040 Verbal staff report Director of Engineering, Tom Dawes, reported that recently staff did some testing on two of the six new digester gas flares. One was tested at each plant and it was discovered that the flares were not in compliance with Districts' AQMD requirements, by a minor amount. Staff notified the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as required, and a variance was granted for 30 days to fix the two flares. The flares were repaired under emergency staff authority, tested and are now operating within the limits imposed by SCAQMD. Mr. Dawes further reported that staff then began an inspection of the other four flares and believes they are also in need of repair. The major work needed is to replace burners, which actually melted down due to excessive temperatures, and to modify certain controls which will change the air and digester gas mix and burning temperatures. SCAQMD is being requested to grant a second variance for the other flares. -20- 04/14/93 Mr. Dawes stated authority was being requested to hire the burner manufacturer, Sur-Lite Corporation, to do the repairs and to conduct monthly inspections of the burners while they are in operation, for up to two years. It is expected that they will be taken out of service and placed in a standby mode before the two-year period is up as the central generation facilities �,.✓ should be brought on line by then. Following a brief discussion, the following actions were taken. Authorizing consideration of Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plant Nos. 1 and 2. Specification No. R-040 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of a supplemental agenda item relative to Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: �✓ That the Staff Report dated April 8, 1993, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Sur-Lite Corporation for Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Specification No. R-040 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Sur-Lite Corporation in an amount not to exceed $129,400.00 for Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040. -21- 04/14/93 DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate a Professional Services That the Selection Committee be, and is Agreement with Boyle Engineerina hereby, authorized to solicit a proposal and Corporation for the Preparation of negotiate a Professional Services Agreement plans and specifications for Contract with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the No. 7-23 preparation of plans and specifications for Gisler-Red Hill Parallel Force Main, from College Avenue Pump Station to Iowa Street, Contract No. 7-23. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. -22- 04/14/93 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors `..� of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies That the Selection Committee certification to design Contract No. 3-36R of the final negotiated fee relative to the Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies to design Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Mains (First and Second Units), and New Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 3-36R, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 93-44-3, approving said agreement with The Keith Companies for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $85,683.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Actions pertaining to request to reduce sewer connection charges for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton Receive and file Staff Report Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated April 7, 1993, re Request for Consideration of Reduced Connection charges for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -23- 04/14/93 Receive and file letter from Jan Development Co. requesting reduction of \� connection charges Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from Jan Development Co. dated March 17, 1993, requesting reduction of connection charges for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file letter from District Chairman Sal Sapien requesting consideration of reduction of connection charges Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter four District Chairman Sal Sapien dated March 18, 1993, requesting consideration of a reduction of sewer connection charges for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Referring request to Fiscal �...� Policy Committee Following a motion to have staff conduct a study on whether a reduction of connection charges for low income and/or senior citizen housing is appropriate, the General Counsel was asked to comment. Mr. Woodruff reported that this is not the first time that a request of this nature has been presented to the Districts, but none have been granted. There have been similar requests in several of the other Districts. He pointed out that the request is to reduce the sewer connection charges. These charges are established by ordinances that are adopted after a variety of procedural requirements have been satisfied. The ordinances have no provision for the waiver or modification of any charges. Mr. Woodruff pointed out that in order to effectively reduce the sewer connection charges, the Board would need to conduct hearings and process an ordinance amendment, which would probably include various findings that would have to be made in order to justify the amendment. -24- 04/14/93 He further advised that in the early 1970's and 1980's, the Districts received certain grant monies under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Hundreds of millions of dollars were received for the building of Plant 1 and Plant 2 facilities. One of the statutory requirements under federal law was that the Districts had to adopt a comprehensive revenue program. One `a.✓ component of that program was that there be an established uniform, fair and equitable levy of charges and assessments, and that all parties must pay - on a fair and equitable basis. He stated that if one property owner was allowed to pay a lesser charge than all other owners in that area, the District could be found in violation of the requirement which might jeopardize the District's grant monies. The Directors then entered into a discussion regarding the equitability of connection charges, the financial impact on the District and other aspects of reducing charges for some properties, and the uniformity of fee policies among the several Districts. During the discussion the Chair also recognized Mr. Edward Czuker, Vice President of Jan Development Company, the project's developer, who addressed the Directors in support of his request for a sewer connection charge reduction. Following further discussion, a substitute motion was moved, seconded and duly carried that the issue of reducing sewer connection charges for low income and/or senior citizen housing be referred to the Fiscal Policy Committee for review and report back. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993. 44ov4l A r Assistant Se t y the Boards of Directors Of County S itation istricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -25- FUND NO 9199 - JT D1S7 WORKING CAPITAL PROLESSING DATE 3/G4/93 PAGE I REPORT NUMBLR AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COON TV CLAIMS PAID 03/16/93 POSTING DATE u3/1U/13 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT ULSCR1PT10N F . . 120330 ASH BUSINESS MACHINES S404.Uu SERVICE AGREEMENT _ 128331 _ AMERICAN TELEPHONE 6 TELEGRAPH $1,3.3.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES - 128332 - ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP 525.710.00 ENGINE TESTING SERVICES M.O.11-I8-92 . '. 128333 AIR COLD SUPFLY INC $11.70 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS 128334 ALFA-LAVAL INC S1T0.44 BOOK 128335- ALLIED . SUPPLY CO $578.89 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 129336 BLAKE P ANUERSON $144.91 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 128337 A-FLUS SYSTEMS 64.138.41 NOTICES 6 ADS 128338 APPLIED SIOSYSTE MS INC $145.71 LAB SUPPLIES a 128339 ABC LABORATORIES $235.00 LAB SERVICES 128340 ARA01ER SERVICES INCUNIFORM REMALS � � - 1283A1 ARMOA - VAC $ S9.47.4. VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 128342 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC 9494.15 WASTE HAULING PEES 128343 ART WORKS $10.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES - - 128344 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. 31.236.DO WASTE OIL REMOVAL I2B345 AU70 SHOP E6u1FMENT CO $506.43 TRUCK PARTS 12S 346 AWARDS A iR OPH/CS SIUO.85 AWARDS 6 PLAQUES - -- 128347 BFI PORTABLE SERVICES SS5.31 - RENTAL EQUIPMENT 12830E KKK LANDFILL 51.063.64 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 x 0 128349 BRW SAFETY 6 SUPPLY $1,133.86 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128350 BAKER PLYWOOD CC INC $1,927.13 BUILDING MATERIALS �. 128351 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS 3243.40 BOOKS 128352 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 5709.82 BATTERIES Y -- - 128353 SAUER COMPRESSOR 3684.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES 126354 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 39.953.61 LAB SUPPLIES F. 129355 BEACH PAVING INC. 59.200.00 PAVING SERVICES 128356 DON C BEATTIE P.E. $200.60 MACHINE REPAIRS 1p 128357 BELL SECURITY $15.768.50 TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES 128358 WT DILLARD INC 3225.41 _ MACHINE REPAIRS 128359 " SIOSAFETY SYSTEMS. INC. $88.37 LAB SUPPLIES 128360 BISHOP COMPANY $212.95 TOOLS 128361 BUEhRINGER MANNHEIM $233.19 LAB SUPPLIES 128362 BOLSA RADIATOR -SERVICE 938.40 RADIATOR REPAIRS " 0 120363 SORNEMANN PUMPS. INC $22.903.26 PUMP PARTS 128364 DOYLE ENGINEERING CORP 435.973.8b ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-20 - - 129365 BRENNER-FIEDLER 6 ASSOC IN $173.47 PUMP PARTS 128366 BROOKLYN TMERMOMETLH CO IN $109.55 LAB SUPPLIES 126367 BUILDER-S EMPORIUM SE9.09 HARDWARE/LUMBER 128368" - THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFF 1165.40 SUBSCRIPTION � .. 126369 BURKE ENGINEERING CO S.34.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126370 GARY G SYNCED $5.308.13 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT ` - - 126371 BUTLER FAPER COMPANY /708.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128372 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS. INL $3,391.53 SERVICE AGREEMENT 126373 CS COMPANY 3A.357.22 VALVE PARTS - 128374 1993 CWPCA CONFERENCE 62.23i.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 128375 CAL-PAC CHE NICAL CO INC $231.69 CHEMICALS - .1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING URIC 3/E4/93 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CUUNTV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAIR 03/10/93 POSTING DATE 03/30/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ! I 128376 CALTROL IWC S5.ub U.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIER 120377 CALIFORNIA AU70MATIC GATE 4312.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128370 JOHN CAROLLO ENLINEERS $9.161.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36 128379 CENTURY SAFETY INST 8 SUPP se.e96.05 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128388 BRUCE CHAPMAN 35,300.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 128381 CLARM CONSULTANTS S3.49C.01 CONSULTING SERVICES ' 128362 COLICH AND SONS $962.241.60 CONSTRUCTION I-9 128383 COMMUNICATIONS CENTLN 5585.b9 2-MAY RADIO EQUIPMENT "- 128384 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $3,136.78 PUMP PARTS i 128385 CONPUSA. INC. $274.57 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 12b386 CONNELL GM PARTS / UIV S50.91 TRUCE PARTS 228367 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 64,926.73 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 126388 CONSULIOAILD FREIoH7VAYS $452.86 FREIGHT CHARGES 128389 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $2.724.06 TOOLS 1 128390 ' CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO S"616.25 CHLORINE _ 128391 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS S12013N OFFICE SUPPLIES ., 126392 CONTROLCO f602.3n ELECTRIC PARTS 126393 COSTA MESA AUTO SUFFLY S564.24 TRUCK PARTS X 12b394 COSTAR CORE $268.77 LAB SUPPLIES _ 128395 COUN7V WHOLESALE LLECINIC 55V3.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 128396 CMARLES P CRVWLEY CO 5176.2L INSTRUMENT PARTS ld 128397 OHL INC 81.3b4.67 ENGINE PARTS 128398 D A S CONVEYORS $1.332.00 CONVEYOR REPAIRS 128199 DAN TEES TIRE SERVICE 5468.5W TIRES Sa • 128460 DAFFER TIN S742.40 TIRES 1 12b4Ol PETER C DAVID CU 4172.327.24 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2 rl3 - 1284C2 PETER C DAVID CO $1.3,654.27 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2 128403 DEAVER MANUFACTURING CO. $327.05 TRUCK PARTS 120404 DECRA-TRCND 8199.L7 HARDWARE 128405 CC GDELLE a SONS GLASS CO $29.09 BUILDING MATERIALS 126406 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $3,750.51 ANIONIC POLYMER H.O.0-12-92 128407 OIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $677.21 PRINTING 128408 DIGITAL EQUIPMLNT CORP S751.04 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 128409 SYCON CORP 9137.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128410 DISCO PRINT COMPANY 32.136.94 OFFICE FURNITURE 128421 DISPOSAL CONTRUL SERVICE IN $13.010.86 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 129412 DORADO EN7LRPRISLS INC $44,972.18 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 128413 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY Sb20.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128414 DU CORP $177.b8 MECHANICAL PARTS 128915 IASTNAN INC 52.940.19 OPFICB SUPPLI88 228426 FCOANALYSIS INC 5220.0E OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 228417 ECONOMICS PRESS INC 52.704.00 PUBLICATIONS ' 12841E EDUCATION4L DEVELOPMENT SPLC $659.66 EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS 128419 ELECT AIR TOOL Cu 42,973.69 MECHANICAL PARTS 128420 ELECTRU DYNAMIC SERVICES $3.220.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ELECTRICAL 228421 ENCHANTER InC $4.450.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 / I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PNOCESSINO DATE 3/04/93 PAGE 3 P EFORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID L3/10/93 POSTING DATE 63/16/93 YARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OLSCRIP71ON FT .' 120422 ESSENCE GROUP $399.21 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 128423 CHARLES EVANS L ASSOC. 382.041.0C LAS SERVICES M.O.11-18-92 228424 - FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE s3.690.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 1211425 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 696.GG AIR FREIGHT - � 120426 FISCHER 4 PORTER CO $5.253.0b CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 228427- FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 68.b U4.27 LAB SUPPLIES * 128426 FISONS INSTRUMENTS 1262.9i LAB SUPPLIES 128429 FLO-SYSTEMS 45,296.07 PUMP PARTS -" 120430 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS Fi26.Lu PUMP PARTS A 120431 FLUID TECH $956.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES �. 128432 FOLSOM LANE FORD $10.506.24 VEHICLE M.0.4-8-92 128433 - FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 4705.63 FILM 128434 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $243.41 PAINT SUPPLIES 128435 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES $170.12 MECHANICAL PARTS " 128436 THE FOXBORO CD S3.744.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS 128437 FREEDOM IMAGING 657.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT 120438 CITY OF FULLERTON V25.53 WATER USE m 126439 GANAHL LUMBER Co 12.128.77 HARDMARR X 128440 GARRAIT-CALLAHAN COMPANY 31.943.81 CHEMICALS = 128441 DRIES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS si.b G0.04 PIMP PARTS 126442 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $1,021.56 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES ' 128443 GENERAL TELEPHONE CU 4224.30 TELEPHONE SERVICES j 121444 LIFE TECHNOLOGILS/GIBCO/BkL 3168.74 LAB SUPPLIES a 120445 GIERLICH-MITCHLLL INC $4.416.54 MECHANICAL PARTS 128446 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTOMS $330.80 FILM W 128447 pUN GREEN 6 ASSOCIATES 42.245.01 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 128448 HARKER EQUIPMENT CO 4615.30 TRUCK PARTS 128449 HACH COMPANY $1,696.09 CAR SUPPLIES 128450 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL FLASTI $136.43 SCRUBBER PARTS 128451 PL HAWN CO INC 33C2.09 ELECTRIC PARTS 126452 HOERbIGER CVS CALIF INC $566.29 COMPRESSOR PARTS 126453 RE HUGHES CO INC $2,709.25 PAINT SUPPLIES 126454 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11.032.50 WATER USE 128455 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUbBEK STA 430.bb OFFICE SUPPLIES 126456 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $36.554.66 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92 - ' 228457 -""" INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION HUWTkS $133.00 BOORS v 128450 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SHOE CO. 43.595.4b SAFETY SHOES 128459 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 4668.56 CONNECTORS 128460 INGRAM PAPER 31,266.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128462 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 4166.94 RATER USE 128462 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 3685.12 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 128463 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO S105.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS . 128464 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 3186.43 ELECTRIC PARTS 12P465 JONES CHEMICALS INC $2,165.69 CHEMICALS - ' 12P466 JORDAN CONTROLS INC $78.46 INSTRUMENT 128467 WELLY PIPE CO 6737.3u PLUMBING SUPPLIES 41 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DAIL 3/04193 PAGE 4 - REPORT NURSER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION UISIRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY � CLAIMS PAID 63/14/93 POSTING DATE 63/lb/93 t ,I WARRANT NO. yLNOUN AMOUNT DESCRIPTION /? 12P468 KING BEARING INC >4.234.14 MACHINE SUPPLIES 126469 KNOK INDUSTRIAL SUPFLILS s1.393.44 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128470 MARTIN KORDICK SR >2,641.94 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 128471 LA THONICS 197b.39 CAMERA 126472 LAYMAN, JONES A DYE. LAWYERS 31,615.•5 LRGAL SERVICES - COOPER INDUSTRIES 128473 LEGI-TECH 1320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES ' 128474 LECO CORPORATION 4962.99 LAS SUPPLIES 128475 LEYCO ELECTRIC Cu 4314.69 TRUCK PARTS 128476 LICBC RT CORPORATION $364.74 FREIGHT 12fi 477 COUNTY SANITATIOn OISTMICT >L39.9G4•L4 POOLED EMIR. ESTIM. PLAN M.0.12-13-89 120478 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $933.33 OCEAN MONITORING 128479 MPS >ib.44 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 126480 MACOMCu 1320.bb SERVICE AGREEMENT 228481 MA6NETEK NATIONAL LLECTRIL >2.657.13 ELECTRIC PARTS 126482 MARTEN $323.42 JANITORIAL SUPPLIER 128483 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 1150.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 228464 MATT - CHLON INC $7,856.96 VALVE PARTS rn 128485 MCCOY SHEET METAL WORKS IN •169.64 ELECTRIC PARTS X 128486 MICMOAGE OF CENRITUS $3,527.14 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 2 128487 MIDWAY MFG A MACHINING 1.07b.50 MECHANICAL PARTS 12898E MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES 4190.82 FITTINGS 128489 MISSION INDUSTRIES S1,724.60 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128490 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO $969.60 ELECTRIC PARTS 128491 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION >297.106.CG CONSTRUCTION 2-30 a i 220492 NATIONAL FIRE FkOTECTIOR AS 15WV.22 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128493 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC a15O.04 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 12849q NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL i138.70 WATERY FILM RENTALS . 128495 CITY TI NLYP OR/ BEACH 515.51 WATER USE 128497 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SEPtliCLS .292.15 SAFETY CLASPER 128498 - THE OhMART CORP $4.292.15 INSTRUMENT PARTS 12849E OA SIS TOMS CO s34 HLI.Ob CHLORINE REGISTAkTIO 126500 ORACLE CORPORATION >i00.6A TRAINING REGISTES 128501 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUYPL $340.66 ELECTRIC TSPPLI88 128502 ORANGE COAST PETROLEUM ARUIF >340.66 TRUCK PARTS ' 128502 ORANGE COUNTY OV10 FARTS C 3b1.20 TRUCK PARTS 128503 ORANGE COURIER 1267.00 FREIGHT * 128504 ORANGE VALVE A FITIIh6 CO. 41,229.22 FITTINGS 128505 ONGA NON TEKNIKA >1u2.3b LAS SUPPLIES 128506 ONI/EA CORP $1.842.10 PUMP PARTS 96 12P 507 0ITG EN SLRVIC, Sc.041.96 SPECIALTY GASES 120508 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S1r988.14 WORKERS COMP INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT 120509 PSI *153.62 MECHANICAL REPAIRS ! 128510 PSSI 41.32b.50 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 128511 PACIFIC FARTS $449.31 INSTRUMENT 128512 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 41,195.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES 126513 PACIFIC BELL $453.28 TELEPHONE SERVICES FUND NO 9159 - JT DIST WOkKING CAPITAL PPOGESSIN4 DATE 3/u4/93 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 • _ _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COON TV CLAIMS PAID N3/10/93 POSTING DATE 03/10/93 • �. _ WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION / 128514 PACIFIC WATCH CONDITIONING C 168.46 RENTAL EQUIPMENT ;a 120515 PACTLL MERIDIAN SYSTLMS 31.627.:. TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 128516 PADAE JANITORIAL SUPF 32.492.79 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 128517 PAK WEST S1.132.B8 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 228518 PALMIERI, TTLEP, WIENER. 41163.b5 LEGAL SERVICES 14-1-1A 128519 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES 12N520 PERKIN-LLMER CORPORATION S501.25 LAB SUPPLIES 128521 PITNEY BOWES 1530.W0 SERVICE AGREEMENT y 120522 PITNEY BOWLS CREDIT LORP S163.18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 120523 POLVMETkICS. INC. $1.436.05 SERVICE AGREEMENT 128524 POLYFURE INC $11.268.19 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 128525 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY GO $161.75 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 9 128526 PRECISION GLASS BLOWING $228.40 LAB SUPPLIES 125527 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICL 3126.0C ICE 128528 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $4,160.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION H.D.7-17-91 12BS29 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS f2.350.83 ELECTRIC PARTS 126530 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO $3,138.82 TRASH REMOVAL 128531 RAININ INSTRUMENT CU 4121.47 LAB SUPPLIES X - e 128532 RECYC INC S29.467.95 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 2 128533 REMOTE MLTLR RESETTING SYST $5.000.00 POSTAGE 126534 COMMUNITY BUSINESS bRAPHICS 41,5.10 PRINTING w 120535 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY 31.926.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 128536 RESEARCH PRODUCTS 191. CORF 173.96 LAB SUPPLIES 126537 REWES LNGIkELAING CO S4.868.75 HARDWARE y Aq 120536 RICH COLOR LAD $29.63 PRINTING 128539 ROCKWELL ENb INLERIN6 L LWUIF $1.452.60 MACHINE PARTS LIT 120540 RODNEY-HUNT CO 43.733.54 BAR SCREEN PARTS 0 128541 ROSEMOUNT INC. $429.69 ELECTRIC PARTS 128542 RYAN-NERCO 44.6D8.75 ELECTRIC METER 120543 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP $2,653.61 PARTS CLEANER 128544 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1.232.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 126545 SANTA DANK 143.u12.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30 128546 DOUG SARVIS 41.125.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 128547 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT.L S311.648.95 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-30-92 128540 SCIMED A CORP $156.50 LAB SUPPLIES 128549 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES INC $733.78 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128550 SEA COAST DESIGNS S1.b64.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12B551 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 3723.06 LAB SUPPLIES '- 128552 - SHASTA ELECTRIC 31C.543.6U OFFICE EQUIPMENT • . 126553 SHURELUCk SALES $2,143.12 HARDWARE 126554 SILVERS INSTRUMENTATION $347.50 LAB SUPPLIES "- 128555 SIGMA CHEMICAL CU S269.U9 LAB SUPPLIES 126556 SKYPARk WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI 3db4.GG PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 128557 SLIDE MASTER $77.58 PRESENTATION AIDS 128558 SMITH PIPE L SUPPLY INC Si15.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 126559 $O COAST Alk QUALITY S150056.G0 PERMIT FEES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PAOLESSING DATE 3164/93 PALL 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION OISIKICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAID 63/10/93 POSTING GAIL 03/16/93 �1 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT UtSCP IP7/ON 128560 SCABNO UPDATL TRAINING $125.6. TRAINING REGISTRATION 128561 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 125.696.02 POWER 128562 SO CAL GAS CO $40,604.67 NATURAL GAS 128563 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CU $1.31U.56 DIESEL FUEL 128564 SOUVENIR PHOTO $19.55 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 128565 SPARMLETTS DRINKING WATER 52.21 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 124566 SPARLINU INSTRUMENT CO INC S219b9.15 METER 120567 STAMEN Z SPASSOPF Ft s5.95G.U0 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-19-162 128560 VESTALLOY INC 41.043.35 HARDWARE �! 128569 SPLAKER SUPPORT 572.73 PRESENTATION AIDS 128570 SPEX INDUSTRIES INC . s579.39 LAB SUPPLIES "- 129571 GRECO FLEAIBLE 3464.96 TRUCK PARTS 128572 STANCOOS VACUUM SERVCE 51.072.57 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 128573 JAMES STANFILL CONSTRUCTION $1.900.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 128574 " ' STEMMERS TREE SERVICE SSoG.00 LANDSCAPING _ 128575 SUMMIT STEEL $984.84 METAL 128576 SUPLLCO INC $103.31 LAB SUPPLIES f7l 12857T SUPER CHEM COOP 31.LL..LY CHEMICALS X 128570 SUPER ICE CORP se2.82 LAB SUPPLIES S 128579 TAYLUR-DUMN MFG COMPANY S920.33 TRUCK PARTS 128590 TECH SYSTEMS 1211.53 TRUCK PARTS bGEm 128581 CHARLES E THOMAS 5818.i1 TRUCK PARTS 1285b2 TMON PSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY s1.968.2U MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 126503 TONT•S LOCK L SAFE SERVICE $268.11 KEYS AND LOCKS 1 128504 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL 3419.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES I 128565 TOTO LANDSCAPING CO $7,238.77 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.11-13-91 - 128506 NESTRONICS 4125.95 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 128587 TRAVEL EXECUTIVLS $138.60 TRAVEL SERVICES .. 128588 TRAVLL TRAVEL $143.00 TRAVEL SERVICES 128589 - TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY INC $1,552.66 TRUCK PARTS 129590 JG TUCKER L SON INC $2,507.67 INSTRUMENT - 128591 UHLER. INC $192.085.65 CONSTRUCTION 5-32 128592 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $269.00 LAB SUPPLIES d 128593 UNOCAL 9121.52 UNLEADED GASOLINE 128594 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $400.30 PARCEL SERVICES 128595 DATAVAULT U S SAFE DEPOSIT LO. $1.405.GL COMPUTER DATA STORAGE f 12859E VG/FISIONS INSTRUMENTS 19.299.53 LAB EQUIPMENT 128597 VVR SCIENTIFIC $6.919.67 LAB SUPPLIES 128598 VALLEY CI71ES SUPPLY CO 36.678.47 PLUMBING PARTS � .. 128599 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS sb9b.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128600 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $164.29 LAR SUPPLIES 228601 VARNCR ACOUSTICS. INC. $1.605.44 BUILDING MATERIALS . 228662 VAUGHAN COMPANY $4.981.25 PUMP PARTS 128603 VERNE-S PLUMBING 5210.06 PLUMBING SERVICES 128604 VERTEX SYSTEMS s8.037.56 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 128605 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 319.91 BOOK n FUND NO 9199 - JT DISI WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSIN6 DATE 3/04193 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 V _ CUUNTY SANITATION 014TRICTS OF URAMUE 'COU AT i� CLAIMS PAID 03/16/93 POSTING DATE L3/1C/93 WARRANT NO. - VENDOR 4MOUNT DESCRIPTION ^, 126606 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEU. $29.69 PUBLICATION .� 128607 WESTERN INDUSTRIAL TLCHNOL06Y $2.166.69 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 128608 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUFPLT 524.982.90 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.6-12-92 128609 VEST PUBLISHING COMPANY 3110.42 PUBLICATION _ 128610 WITE6 $515.76 LAB SUPPLIES 128611 ROURKE S WODDRUFF 4 UK $56,152.50 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 _ 128612 KEROX CORP f14.609.39 COPIER LEASES 4 228613 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $642.14 VALVES - - 128614 GEORGE YARDLEY CO 4356.7U INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 129615 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP $868.63 CHART PAPER .12861E ZIEPARTH 6 ALPER/C.S. ALTER $16,096.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 .... . ----------------- ' TOTAL CLAIMS FAID 03/10/93 $3,073,814.96 ...+ SUMMARY AMOUNT X 42 OPEN FUND $404.99 _ 42 CAP FAC .FUND $332,365.00 - 43 OPEN FWD $25,267.36 43 CAP FAC FUND $275,991.51 -i 45 OPER FUND $1,026.94 45 CAP PAC FUND $82,968.05 I _ 47 OPBR FUND $4,029.23 'J _ 87 CAP FAC FOND $36,068.89 R11 OPEN FUND $921.30 R11 GP FAC FUND $320.00 _ 814 OPER FUND $66.00 414 CAP FAC FUND $863.85 r 4566 OPER FUND $4,079.98 4566 CAP FAC FUND $29,141.95 8607 OPEN FUND $2,303.10 47614 OBER FUND $7,747.69 JT OPER FUND $677,448.08 MAP $1,421,127.67 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $1,988.14 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $179,797.23 a. $3,073,814.97 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST BURNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 1 { ry REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ... CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATE 03/24/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION E ' 128651 AO TECH COMPANY 1187.149.9E I20652 _ A T 6 T f3rB20.1] RESIDUALS RBNOVAL N.0.10-9-91 128653 ACCV-LABS RESEARCH INC $150.00 LONG DIBTANCB TELEPHONE SERVICES-- BAVIC68 - LAB SERVXCSSEPA 14 128655 ADVANCED COOLING TE CHNOLOGIES 1924.64 MILLER REPAIRS 12865E _ ALL PRODUCTS 6 CNLM IC AL IN 319rbbb4e ORBVALUE A00.88MBNT CRY. GEN. BYBT M.0.8-9-89 12865E ALLIED EUFPEY CO ilr$60.00 VALVB IN 120658 AMBER ERI STEEL E CULTURE $99.00 PLAN 6 SPIES REFUND _ 128658 _ AMERICAN TOPE CULTURE CULLLLIN 326.70 LAB SUPPLIES 12865E ANAHEIMM COUP $664.70 LAB BUPPLIS9 128661 ANANEIM SDIST DISTRIBUTION 110N $426.01 OFFICE SLIER RBPAIRB - DIST 7 �••_ _ 128662 ANIX7ER - DIS CONTRO10N $230.90 SERVICE SUPPLIES - 128663 ANTHONYTNONY PEST CONTROL $374.79 SERVICE AOR8SM6NT 128664 A-PLUS IE SYSTEMS f]79.73 NOTICU9 6 ADS 12866E APPLIED LI06Y STEMS INC f9$145.68 LOB BUPPLI68 .. _ 128666 ACC (APPLIED BORATO COMPUTER SOLU110q 5195.6E LABCOMPUTER BUPPLI68 I 12866E ABC LABORATORIES f1r392.00 LAB BUPPLIRV Y 128668 _ ARAIEM INDUSTRIES INC 42.5E INSTRUMENT SERVICE X 12866E - ARENS IN INSTRUME INC $1,691d5 INSTRUMENT eUPPLIEe X 12866E ARIL ODI INSTRUMENT 32&450.]2 INSTRUMENT 128671 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC $136.90 WASTE OIL INGREM VAL pO 128672 ASBURT ENVIRONMENTAL SCRY. .803.00 WASTE EMBE OIL REMOVAL - �'.� 128672 AMSA f12$150.00 SUPPLABAIP DUES N.O.1-13-92. _ 12B674 _ AUTOMATI TDATAA L 3ANIA FL NP 3150.O5 SUPPLY AGREEMENT ESSI - 126675- - AUTOMATIC DATA YSOCLSSINI $T553.25 PAYROLL PROCESSING BERVIC68AN ' 12867E BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 3518.2E TRUCKRESIDUALS PARTS F+ 12B677 BNM LANDFILL f2r 766.4E SAFETY REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91 _ 4J - 128678 BAY SAFETY 6 SUPPLY 465.79 BAFSTY BUPPLI68 � . 12867E BANANA BLUEPRINT RIC f$1,203.67 BLUSPDEFERRED COO BTRVICES ANSFE 12867E _ _ BABA OF AMERICA ti$117.20 _ PUBLICATION COMP TRANSFER _ 128680 BARCEAEM LAY PUbLI SN ERS 6.75.00 PUBLICATION - -- 120682 B bATEMAN S546.40 BATTERIES COMP DISTRIBUTION _ 128682 SA77LPY COMPRESSOR 3596.1E COMPRESSOR 128684 BAUEE COMPRESSOR 3190.6E LAB RBPAIRB _ r . 12868E BEATER PAVING INC. INC 19,775.66 LAB BUPPLI68 128661 BEACH PAYING INC. i19.775.40 _ LAB SERVICES 12968E BECRM AN INSTRUMENTS 19.341.3E TEMPORARY BUPPLI68 126687 BELL SECURITY ' 33$161.07 LAB SUPPLIES SECURITY SERVICES 12868E BID-RAG NLABORATORIES $550.00 TRAINING BUPPLI68 12868E BIONECEAB A710N ST NY051 UM f550.00 - PUMPS REGISTRATION -" 129690 BOYLENA NN PUMPS. G 312.810.62 ENGINEERING ___128691 BDYLE ENGINEERING CUSP s5 r299.35 INSTRUMENT SERVICES 7-19 128692-' bRENNIN-P IEOLER L ASSOC IN .026.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES � 128693 bRIININ EE LIE CTR IC i1r 026.5E ELECTRIC PARTS 12869E BR O4N AUTOMATION $2,272.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS --'128693 BUILOCR-S LMYOR IUN 201.26 RARDMARB/LUMBRR 128696 BURNE ENGINEERING CO $774.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18193 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 __.. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATE 03/24/93 WARRANT NO. yENDON AMOUNT DESCRIPTION II .� 128697 BUS" AND ASSOCIATES INC 312.14S.U0 SURVEY SERVICES RKS 5-051 128698 BUSINESS LASS INC $53.00 BOOK _ 128699 GART 6 STREED $2,356.84 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 126700 CRC PRESS INC 387.45 BOOKS 126701 CS COMPANY R4.248.30 VALVE 120702 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC Sbtl9.85 TRUCK PARTS 128703 CALIF SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL $95.06 MEMBERSHIP ODES 128704 CARLETON ENGINEERS 411.325.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 128705 CENTURY SAFETY INST 8 SUPP 32,651.85 SAFETY SUPPLIES I20706 CHURCH ENGINEERING INC $5.109.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-941 128707 _ COLE-PARKER INSTRUMENT CO 4344.53 LAB SUPPLIES 128706 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1.018.50 MECHANICAL PARTS 128749 COMPUSA. INC. $987.85 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 128710 CONNiLL OM PARTS / DIV S120.30 TRUCK PARTS 121721 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 312.025.29 ELECTRIC PARTS 128712 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $5,346.39 TOOLS 128713 _ CONTROL CABLES INC 8196.67 TRUCK PARTS 128714 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $5.740.63 CONSULTING SERVICES m 122725 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS 41.271.30 TRUCK PARTS _ 128716 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW MAINT. 32,250.00 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES _ 120717 CAL POLY KELL0GG UNIT 5215.50 TRAINING REGISTRATION to 229718 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL $6.72 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEES 128119 DAILY PILOT SV0.U0 NOTICES 6 ADS 120720 J.Y. D'ANGELO EO INC $7,515.57 PIPE tv A 129721 DE ANZA CORPORATION 4150.06 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 129722 DEAVER MANUFACTURING CD. $19.84 TRUCK PARTS N 129723 _ DELTA TECH SERVICE INC 314.008.b5 HIGH VOLUME OIL FLUSH ' .. 129124 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO $11,280.35 VALVE 128725 DIFILIPPO ASSGCIATES $2.395.58 _ PRINTING 128726 - - DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 59.953.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT 126727 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN 31.774.51 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL 120728 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $11.562.99 _ PLANT MAINTENANCE 8 REPAIRS :. 12ST29 ROBERT'F DRIVER ASSOC $20.400.00 - INSURANCE DEPOSIT - 1. 128730 SUNN EDWARDS CORP $787.72 PAINT SUPPLIES _128731 EASTMAN INC W4.b59.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES 128732 - ECOANALYSIS INC $5.061.09 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 128733 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES 33.680.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - ELECTRICAL 128734 EKED 467.56 SAFETY SUPPLIES •' -� 12073B - ENCHANTER INC 15,040.00 OCEAN MONITORING 6-10-92 '. 126736 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC 5862.00 LAB SERVICES 128737 MARSHALL FAIRRES $128.68 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 129738 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5.200.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91 128739 FEDERAL EKPNLSS CORP 3465.75 AIR FREIGHT _ 128740 FERRELLGAS $122.58 PROPANE 128711 FISCHER 0 PORTER CO $4,792.68 CHLORINATION PARTS ' ry 128742 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 3.7.635.45 LAS SUPPLIES 'i FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 3 :-y ; REPORT NUMBER AP43 ! COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY .•I _ _ -- - CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATE 63/24/93 U I.I WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ? ,' 126743 FISONS INSTRUMENTS f/26.64 LAB SUPPLIES 128744 _ FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. S.54.GG CONCRETE CUTTING 128745 FLO-SYSTEMS $8.157.46 MECHANICAL PARTS . '�• 128746 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $76.05 PUMP PARTS 128747 FLUID TECHNOLOGIES $2b5.25 OIL TESTING SERVICES 128748 CLIFFORD A FURKLNT 96.472.25 SURVEYING SERVICE OPEC 8-051 r 128749 FOSS MARITIME CO s1.062.V4 JANITORIAL SERVICES 19075D FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $299.78 FILM r I1•__ - - 198751 - - FOUNTAIN VALLEY - PAINT t293.87 PAINT SUPPLIES 128752 BUD FRET $21.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 126753 CITY OF FULLERTON $30.66 WATER USE - ' 120754 GANAHL LUMBER CO 3301.98 LUMBER/HARDWARE 128755 GA/ES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS f6.963.54 PIPE 128756 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $172.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 126757 - GENERAL TELEPHONE CO 44,554.65 TELEPHONE SERVICES �•• 128758 TOM GERLINGEK Stl.000.Du DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 128799 N GLANTZ 6 SON $26.96 PAINT SUPPLIES 128760 GOV.I FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $355.06 MEMBERSHIP DUES m 126T61 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $233.23 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES X 120762 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $5.626.25 FILM CL CONSTRUCTION J-23-2 ' r 128764 FRE TECHNOLOGY 3152.621.8E *'. 128765 HARK A HARPER IND $1.062.68 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 126766 _ __ HASCO ION INDUSTRIAL PLnSiI f3.482.48 VALVE 12876E HASCO OIL CO INC f117.40 OIL i GREASE A 129767 HAUL AWAY CONTAINERS 31.G20.06 CONTAINER RENTALS t)v .. _ _ 128768 PL HAWN CO INC f1 T940.36 REIMBURSEMENT -- 128770 HEWLE HA TDOCN .111.00 RBIMBURSBMBNT AGREEMENT 128771 HEWLETT PACKAxO $1$197.78 TOOLS AGREEMENT 128771 MIL TI INC f$61.09 TRUCK �•� 226773 HY STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE 125.87 - TRUCK PARTS" _ 126773 NOENHUGHE CYO CALIF INC $125.87 COMPRESSORMECHANICAL PARTS 120771 _ AS HU6COR CO INC 54,116.89 CONSTRUCTION BUPPLIEB 126776 HUNTER CORPORATION t151.$27.89 OFFICE J-19-1 +;- 12877E HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER SCHWI SlA f27.80 OFFICE 9UPPLIEB 128776 NU NTINGTON VALLEY SCxYIMN L 5130.13 BICINSTCLERUMENTATION PARTS -12:779 IOC f9.028.5U - IERRIC CHLORIDE CONSULTING 12S 780 IMPERIAL I WEST CHEMICAL f64.695.07 CONNECTORS CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 128761 INDUSTRIAL THNEA DED PRODUCTS f95.07 CONNECTORS -- 12B7B1 - IN6R AM PAPER f260.13 OFFICE 9UPPLI89 '- 128782 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS f1.087.30 BATTERIES 12878 JLA CREDIT GORY .32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 128784 GRLAT WESTERN SANITARY SUMP $883 5883.3E JANITORIAL BUPPLIEB - 128785 a r• - J S CATERING .3 DIRBCTOR B' ME ETING BYPBNBB 12878E JENOEN INSTRUMENTS CO $910. 3 HRRDWAHE 12978 M• SUSPENSION SLRVICE S5G. 8 TRUCK REPAIRS 12788 KAMAN BEARINGS a SUPPLY $92.58 INSTRUMENT BUPPLI88 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18193 PAGE 4 REP OhI NUMBER AP43 .. _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COU NIT CLAIMS FAIU 03/24/93 POSTING DATE V3/24/93 ll!.I i WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMONN7 OESCRIPTION 126789 KARCHER INSULATION INC 61.99O.D6 .•4 12B790 KEENAN A ASSOCIATES $2.475.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 128791 KING BEARING INC $4,452.01 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128792 KNOA INDUSTRIAL SUFFLILS f[.423./1 MACHINE SUPPLIES 128793 MARTIN KOMDICK SR $2,900.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128794 LA CELLULAR T6LEPhOME CO $69.48 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-9 126795 LEE 6 NO CONSULTING LN4h $11.306.24 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 128796 KP LINDSTROM INC 64.932.b0 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-30-5 128791 SOCO-LYNCH CORP $156.20 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 128798 MPS 52bl.64 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129799 MACDONALD-STEPMENS LAB 611,210.00 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 128800 MACOMCO $520.65 LAB SERVICES 128801 hARVAC ELECTRONICS S02.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT 120862 MATT - CHLOR INC 97,164.32 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES y 12BB 03 MCtlAIN INSTRUMENTS $41.72 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 128804 MICRO NOTION 61N31.27 LAB SUPPLIES . 128805 MIDWAY RFD 8 MACHINING $12,647.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 120806 MINE SAFETY APPLTANCLS CJ 5.25.52 BUILDING REPAIR$ X I28BG7 MT SSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $472.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES S ' 1288G8 JAMES M MONTGGNERY Slu2.721.9b WELDING SUPPLIES 128609 JN MONTGOMERY ENGINEERS $3,124.28 ENGINEERING SERVICES H.O.12-12-90 to 228810 TOM MOORE $3.975.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 128821 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC f1.567.56 CONSULTING SERVICES 126812 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 569.35 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES bO , 128813 NEVARM ELECTRONICS 6126.ba SAFETY FILM RENTAL r 128814 OCS REPRUGRAFMICS INC 5121.22 ELECTRIC PARTS 128815 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICLS f605.44 LAB SUPPLIES 128016 OFFICE PAVILIUN/INTERIUN RES fI.Ob2.69 SAFETY GLASSES 120B1T OK STSTENS CO Ss9.633.02 OFFICE PARTITIONS ^• 126818 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL $36.72 CHLORINE H.0.10-9-91 126819 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C 5344.96 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 126020 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUFPLY C $70.96 TRUCK PARTS i 128021 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $1,444.27 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 128822 4AY6EN SERVICE $2.611.91 FITTINGS 128623 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $3.611.17 SPECIALTY GASSES -- - 128924 CSDOC SELF-FUNUEO MEDICAL 1 $240.006.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION • 228825 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT f7.bu T.39 PREMIUM ADVANCE _ 128026 ROBERT L CITRON $108.60 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT ' 128827 PACIFIC PARTS $3,931.41 92/93 PROPERTY TRUE �• 128828 FACT FIC $AFCTY EYUIPMENT CO 5876.03 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES I.. 12BP 29 PACIFIC BELL $5i.6B SAFETY SUPPLIES 128830 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C 168.40 TELEPHONE SERVICES 128831 PACTEL MCNIDIAN SYSTEMS $429.19 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 128832 PAUNE JANITORIAL 6UPP S482.72 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 128833 PAGLNET f67.56 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 128834 PAK WEST $547.10 PAGER RENTAL JANITORIAL SUPPLIES FUND NO - 9199 - JT DIST YUNKINU CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/93 PALL 5 REPORT COUNTY SANITATION UISIRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY NUMBER AP93 CLAIMS PA10 US/24193 POSTING DATE 03/24/93 WARRANT NO• VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION ! ! 128835 FARKSON CORPORATION 5644.51 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 128836 PARTS UNLIMITED $1.550.7i TRUCK PARTS .� 128837 STEVE PELLETIER $8.506.06 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 128838 NUY PENUERGRAFT 5460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128839 PERKIN-ELMLR CUNPURATION 45.J69.53 LAB SUPPLIES 128840 PIMA 6RU SYSTEMS INC 3295.BB5.44 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 r 126841 PLAINS TRULVALUE HARDWARE $69.86 HARDWARE _ 126642 POLVPURE INC 528.433.65 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 120043 PORVENE ROLL-A-DOOR $127.00 ELECTRIC PARTS 128844 POWER ELECTRG SUPPLY CO $136.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 228845 PRECISION INOUS7RIES $401.22 HARDWARE 128846 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS "06.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 120047 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S84.UL ICE 128648 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $3,100.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 128849 STEVE P. RADOS. INC. $163.804.00 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-3A-2 128850 RED WING SHOES 162b.77 SAFETY SHOES 128851 RIOT EXPRESS $92.95 MESSENGER SERVICES 128852 THE RL61STLR 51.35T.2G NOTICES 6 ADS X128853 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSI $5.600.00 POSTAGE = 128854 COMMUNITY BUSINESS GRAPHICS 5112.3b PRINTING 128855 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $4,961.26 PLUMBING SUPPLIES tz 128656 ROBBINS SCIENTIFIC $3,012.05 LAB EQUIPMENT 120057 J R ROBERTS CORP $135,270.30 CONSTRUCTION 0-23-1 f 128650 ROSEMOUNT INC. $949.84 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES CO 128859 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL 41.187.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 128860 ARNOLD S RUMMELSSUR6, C.L. S2.183.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES LP 128861 PE66Y WILCOX b540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 120862 RUSSELL'S CONST. CO. $300.00 CONSTRUCTION 129863 JOSEPH T RYERSON S SUN IN $629.46 STEEL 128864 SKC WEST $917.66 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128865 SAFETY WEST 5288.31 SAFETY SUPPLIES 128866 SANOFI DIAGNOSTICS PASTEUR $458.70 LAB SUPPLIES 128867 SANTA FE BAG CO 5242.4b BUILDING SUPPLIES r' 128068 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 5765.03 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 128869 SEA COAST DESIGNS $412.57 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 126870 SHURELUCK SALES $7.026.26 HARDWARE 128871 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION S102.74 CAR SUPPLIES 128872 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO 5345.48 LAB SUPPLIES . - 126873 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CL1 $2.923.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 126874 SMITH PIPE 6 SUPPLY INC 537.80 PLUMBING SUPPLIES - 1288" SO COAST AIR QUALITY $5,597.00 PERMIT FEES 128876 - SO CALIF CUASTAL WATER 4.95.558.00 SCCWRP M.O.5-8-91 128877 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 4201.660.41 POWER 126878 SO CAL GAS CO $2.378.23 NATURAL GAS 128879 $0 CALIF WATER CO $36.96 WATER USE 128080 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CU 15.170.88 DIESEL/UNLBADED•FUEL I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 . .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID O3/24/93 POSTING DATE 63/24/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION � � •i 128881 SPARKLE ITS DRINKING WATER 31.871.5O DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 128682 _ WESTALLOY INC $179.18 STEEL 126883 SPEAKER SUPPORT $64.65 PRESENTATION AIDS 128884 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCL SYS $3.U24.16 TRAINING REGISTRATION 128885 STERLING ART $40.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12888E STE V ENS PUbLISHIN6 CORP SL99.66 SUBSCRIPTION y 128887 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO $88.43 TOOLS _ 128B88 TCH ASSOCIATES $1.406.69 LAB SUPPLIES 128889 TAYL OR-DUNN MF6 • COMPANY 5213.u1 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 120990 TH OMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $69.98 HARDWARE _ 128891 _ TRANSMATIUN INC 5323.03 PUMP PARTS 128892 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES 3455.00 TRAVEL SERVICES 128693 TRAVEL TRAVEL $481.00 TRAVEL SERVICES 228694 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY INC 3184.11 TRUCK PARTS ^ •+ 228895 JG TUCKER 8 SON INC 4637.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126896 TUSTIN DODGE $23.45 TRUCK PARTS r _ 120897 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 31.728.00 LAB SERVICES M , 128898 UNITED INDUSTRIAL TINE 3442.91 TRUCK PARTS X 128899 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1209.81 PARCEL SERVICES = 120900 VWR SCIENTIFIC $5.394.11 LAB SUPPLIES 129901 VALIN CORPORATION 51.591.71 FILTER 120902 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 31.118.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 128903 VARIER BUSINESS FORMS 341.99 PRINTING 1 1289C4 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $293.56 LAB SUPPLIES OO A 128905 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUFPLV $13.650.29 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92 .. 128906 WESTRU3 INTERNATIONAL $68.7u TRUCK PARTS 128907 WHESSOE VAREC sli6.94 FREIGHT 128948 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES $21.352.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-31 128909 _ ROURKE S WOODRUFF S OR 399.629.6b LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 1289ld AEROX CORE $4,168.65 COPIER LEASES 128911 GEORGE YARDLEY CO S446.95 VALVES 126912 NORMAN E CULVER .234.45 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128913 RICHARD B EDGAR 1200.U0 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 128914 RO8LRT H MAIN 3118.Ob DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ----------------- * TUTAL CLAIMS PAIL L3/14/93 SL.62711.1.02 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/18/93 PAGE 7 M1 'L REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANCTS OF ITATION DATE COTY 03/24 CLAIMS PAID 3/24/93 POSTING E /93 „I n '� _ aauMMARF {6.70 AMODNT .i IIFlUND 1 CAP RFAC FUND i58r971.00 2 OPER FUND {{3,916.94 92 CAP PAC FUND S31r731.68 3 OPER FUND 311197.01 3 CAP FAC FUND 2:183.70 5 OPCR FUND 5,726.59 65 CAP FAC FUND 3,024.00 6 OPER FUND 129.51 8 7 OPBR FUND 4,'179.09 7 CAP PAC FUND 6r 360.52 11 OPER FUND 2 325.20 21 CAP FAC FUND 2:949.06 14 CAP FAC FUND 9 Sr 943.50 9566 OPER FUND " 8566 CAP FAC FUND f3 o 28 JT OPER FUND ffff9 7:467.70 CORP 765 184.02 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS 219:122.16 Fr7 -- IT DIET WORKING CAPITAL FUND 403,015.16 X ' ............. S _W W I 1 I I EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 7:30 p.m., April 14, 1993, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Assistant Secretary reported a quorum present. aaaaaaaataaatt aaf attataaaataaa ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the County Treasurer to make reverse reourchase That the County Treasurer be, and is hereby, investments on behalf of the Districts confirmed as the Districts' Treasurer; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the County Treasurer be, and is hereby, authorized, upon request by the Districts' financial staff, to make reverse repurchase investments in U.S. Treasuries securities of a maximum amount of $50 million, not to exceed ten-year maturities, and that payment of those securities be made by reversing the securities against themselves; and authorizing payment to the County Treasurer of a $200 flat fee per transaction; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to confirm in writing with the County Treasurer, on behalf of the Districts, this action of the Boards. Directors A. B. Catlin and Roger R. Stanton requested that their abstention from voting on this item be made a matter or record. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, PENNY KYLE, Assistant Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of minute entries on the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of April, 1993. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my he d this 14th day of April, 1993. Assistant Sec ary the Boards of Directors of County Oanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) J Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954. 2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on /.(d1,ti" / �/ 19� was duly posted for public inspection at the main "lobby of the Districts - offices on 19� I. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4" day of q4M , 19-0. &n� Penny xy e, an Secretary of each of the Bo rds of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 & 14 of Orange County, California F27A.1