HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-04-14 ' B,,\lAryory O)e
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
ojrY L 9
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX$127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272&8127
\ / 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714)962-2411
April 7, 1993
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 11, 13 & 14
WEDNESDAY. APRIL 14. 1993 - 7:30 P.M.
108" Eris Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
u
The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of
Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and
date.
As Stpfrd secretary
Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings:
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 21st, at 5:30 p.m.
CONSERVATION, RECYCLE - Tuesday, April 27th, at 11:30 a.m.
6 REUSE COMMITTEE at SCAQMD offices, Diamond Bar
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, April 28th, at 5:30 p.m.
PERSONNEL COMMITTEE - Thursday, April 29th, at 5:30 p.m.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
0 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
11C)OM ELLIS AVEMIE
vo.BOX etn
fOUMAW VALLEY.OLIEOPMA W71
,,,.I W-2.11 �A/
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Meetinas Executive Committee Meetinas
April Apr 14, 1993 Apr 28, 1993
May May 12, 1993 May 26, 1993
June Jun 09, 1993 Jun 23, 1993
July Jul 14, 1993 Jul 28, 1993
August Aug 11, 1993 None Scheduled
September Sep 08, 1993 Sep 22, 1993
October Oct 13, 1993 Oct 27, 1993
November Nov 10, 1993 None Scheduled
December Dec 08, 1993 None Scheduled
January Jan 12, 1994 Jan 26, 1994
February Feb 09, 1994 Feb 23, 1994
March Mar 09, 1994 Mar 23, 1994
April Apr 13, 1994 Apr 27, 1994
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127 a 10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 9272"127
Telephone: (714)962.2411
JOINT BOARDS
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
(SUPPLEMENTAL)
APRIL 14, 1993 - 7:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code
Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the
meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda
item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be
submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in
compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda
posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda Items:
�.s (a) Consideration of items pertaining to Repairs and Modifications to
Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040
(1) Verbal report of Staff
(2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated
April 8, 1993 (Copy attached)
(3) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to issue a
purchase order to Sur-Lite Corporation in an amount not to
exceed $129,400.00 for Repairs and Modifications to Flares at
Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040
N../
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
April 8, 1993 109m ELLIS AVENUE
00 SOXFOUNTAIN VALLEv,CALIFORNIA 92729-8127
P1A1962-0A11
STAFF REPORT
Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants 1 and 2
Specification No. R-040
At both treatment plants, the Districts have installed flares for the burning
of excess digester gas in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) operating requirements. This gas, a byproduct of the sewage
treatment process, will be the fuel used in our new Central Power Generation
project. After Central Power Generation is operational, the flares will only be
needed for standby, to burn the gas if Central Power Generation facilities are off
line.
The flares were installed under several contracts. The most recent,
completed in January, included four new flares. They were purchased separately
from the manufacturer by the Districts and installed by a construction contractor.
`.F.� In total, the Districts operate six flares, three at each plant, all manufactured by
Sur-Lite Corporation of Santa Fe Springs, California, which is the only commercial
manufacturer approved by SCAQMD to meet the stringent standards of "best
available control technology" established for flaring wastewater treatment plant
digester gas. The Districts received permits to construct (PTC) from SCAQMD to
construct the flare systems. They had been operating successfully in a trial period;
however, recent emission testing performed to confirm compliance with SCAQMD
requirements have shown that the flares are exceeding the permitted emission level
of oxides of nitrogen, an air pollutant that contributes to smog formation.
The two flares tested (one at each plant) were inspected by the
manufacturer, who discovered that the burners were deformed by high heat. In
order to preclude the issuance of a notice of violation by SCAQMD, staff
immediately filed for a variance under the SCAQMD "breakdown" rule. The
variance was granted for 30 days effective, Monday, March 15.
On an emergency basis, staff issued a purchase agreement under its
procurement authority for replacement burners from Sur-Lite for two flares (one at
each plant), at a cost of approximately $25,000. With the purchase agreement the
flare manufacturer (Sur-Lite) also agreed to investigate and define the cause of
extreme temperature conditions currently being experienced that apparently
damaged the flares, and to make appropriate recommendations for a remedy.
_ Sur-Lite has completed their investigation and made substantial
modifications to the flare at each plant that had failed the test. Among other
' problems, staff believes that the original design and control mechanisms for the
flares may not have been satisfactory. (These were not furnished by Sur-Lite.)
The control system for the flares is very complicated, at best, and an inexact,
cutting-edge technology. Because our use of the digester gas is highly valuable
today, depending upon how many of our existing engines and boilers are operating,
the gas flow conditions that the flares and their controllers must face are highly
variable. Because of these wide ranging conditions, the Districts had been
operating the flares with a higher temperature to ensure that the SCAQMD
minimum temperature requirement of 14000 F would not be violated. This may
have contributed to burner problems. The high temperatures have now been
lowered due to reconfiguration of the flares and changes to the flare operating
parameters. Emission tests have been performed on the two modified flares and,
as of this writing, the flare at Plant 2 has passed. The Plant 1 flare has yet to
pass, possibly because of control problems. Sur-Lite will continue to investigate,
define and correct the problem with the Plant 1 flare and conduct a re-test.
Sur-Lite recommends that the remaining four flares be inspected and any
damaged burners be replaced and the flares modified to match the Plant 2 flare
which is now in compliance. These modifications include a new burner
configuration with more burners and relocation of temperature-sensing
thermocouples. Additionally, Sur-Lite recommends the addition of two more
thermocouples at each flare and changes to the control program.
Staff believes Sur-Lite is best qualified to make the required inspections
and repairs because of their experience in the design of these flares. Actual costs
will not be known until the inspections and repairs are complete; however, full
burner replacement and necessary control modifications (not a part of the original
Sur-Lite purchase order) should not exceed $115,000. Also, staff recommends
that Sur-Lite perform monthly inspections, in an additional amount not to exceed
$600 per month, to ensure that the flares remain in adequate operating condition
to achieve consistent long-term compliance with SCAQMD's operating
requirements. This price includes a substantial discount to the Districts as
compensation for experiencing the above problems. However, Sur-Lite has not
been requested to pay the entire repair and replacement cost because the higher
temperatures and other control changes made by the Districts may also have
contributed to the flare problems.
Staff recommends authorization to issue a purchase order to Sur-Lite
Corporation for Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants 1 and 2, Specification
No. R-040, in an amount not to exceed $115,000.00 plus $600 per month for
monthly inspection for up to a two-year period, for a total amount not to exceed
$129,400.00 plus tax. Staff is applying for an extension of the operating variance
provided by SCAQMD to allow time to repair the remaining flares.
wpdoelenew-04=40893..
•• -2.
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 8127.108" Ellis Avenue
of Orange County,California fountain Valley,CA 92728-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
u JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 14, 1993 - 7:30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code
Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the
meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda
item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be
submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in
compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda
posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
(1 ) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
(3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member
agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board
Meeting folders)
(5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific
agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As
determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific
item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
(6) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal
reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These
reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chairman
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
`r�
04/14/93
(7) EACH DISTRICT
ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following
minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered
by the Chairman:
District 1 - March 10, 1993 regular
District 2 - March 10, 1993 regular
District 3 - March 10, 1993 regular
District 5 - March 10, 1993 regular
District 6 - March 10, 1993 regular
District 7 - March 10, 1993 regular
District 11 - March 10, 1993 regular
District 13 - March 10, 1993 regular
District 14 - March 10, 1993 regular
(8) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint
and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once
and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented
unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See
pages = " and "B"
03110/93 03l24/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - S 677,448.08 $977,467.70
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,421,117.67 765,184.02
Joint Working Capital Fund - 179,797.23 483,815.16
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 1,988.14 219,122.16
DISTRICT NO. 1 - .00 58,477.70
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 332,769.99 35,648.62
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 301,248.87 13,380.71
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 83,994.99 8,750.59
DISTRICT NO. 6 - .00 29.51
DISTRICT NO, 7 - 40,098.12 11,147.61
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 1,149.30 5,275.06
DISTRICT NO. 13 .00 .00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 929.85 45,943.50
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 23,221.93 3,218.68
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,303.10 .00
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 7,747.69 .00
- $3.073.814.96 $2.627.461.02
-2-
04/l 4/`,)J
(9) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 96)
All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as
not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any
particular item is requested to be removed from the consent
calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public
in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these
items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by
one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous
ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All
items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered
in the regular order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the
consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state
their name, address and designate by letter the item to be
removed from the consent calendar.
The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted
from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the
consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and
recommendation and awarding Purchase of One Steam Sterilizer Unit
(Autoclave), Specification No. E-226 (Revised), to Amsco Scientific,
Division of American Sterilizer Company, for a total amount not to
exceed $27,145.00 plus sales tax. See page C
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to
Hewlett-Packard Company in the amount of $62,000.00, plus tax and
freight, for Purchase of Gas Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer
System, Specification No. E-228.
(c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 4 to the plans
and specifications for Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job
No. 1-9, and Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall, Job
No. J-22-2, authorizing an addition of $83,741 .00 to the contract
with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich and Sons, for three items of
additional work, granting a time extension of 14 calendar days for
completion of said additional work, and one item pertaining to a
contract-authorized sales tax adjustment, and one other contract
`.d adjustment. See page D
-3-
04/14/93
�..✓
(9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(d) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 20 to the plans
and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant
No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $53,586.00 to the
contract with Hunter Corporation for 12 items of additional work or
other contract adjustments. See page E
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to
negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the Professional Services Agreement
with John Carollo Engineers for design and construction services,
preparation of operations and maintenance manuals, and training
services re Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-42, to change the scope of work and to provide for additional
design services to investigate new technology for modifications to
enhance advanced treatment effectiveness and efficiency and provide
operational flexibility and reliability.
(f) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit
proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for
engineering evaluation and design and construction support services
required for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant
No. 1, Job No. P1-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility
Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55.
(g) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional
Services Agreement with CH2M Hill for design and programming
services required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring
and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the
Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for
said services. See page E
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-37, approving said
agreement with CH2M Hill for said services, on an hourly-rate
basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to
exceed $690,148.00. See page _G
-4-
1
04/14/93
(9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(h) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional
Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers to prepare plans and
specifications and to provide construction support services for
Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean
Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34:
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the
Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for
said services. See page H
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-38, approving said
agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said services, on an
hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to
exceed $950,252.00. See page
DISTRICTS 1 & 7
(i) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit
a proposal and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement with
Boyle Engineering Corporation for the preparation of plans and
specifications for Gisler-Red Hill Parallel Force Main, from College
Avenue Pump Station to Iowa Street, Contract No. 7-23.
DISTRICT 3
(j) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional
Services Agreement with The Keith Companies to design Replacement
of Westminster Avenue Force Mains (First and Second Units), and
New Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 3-36R
(1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the
Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for
said services. See page J
(2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-44-3, approving said
agreement with The Keith Companies for said services, on an
hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to
exceed $85,683.00. See page K
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
(10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any
..
-5-
04/14/93
111) ALL DISTRICTS
Jai Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee and
consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees'
written reports of their meetings on March 17, 1993 and March 24,
1993, respectively (Copies enclosed with Directors' agenda material)
(bl Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said
Committees:
(1) Consideration of claim of Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and
Ferdon for additional fees for special Co-Bond Counsel services
re Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series
(Executive Committee will report its recommendation on the
claim in closed session).
(2) Consideration of the following actions relative to Investment
Management Policy and Reserve Repurchase Agreements:
(a) Consideration of motion appointing Merrill Lynch,
Districts' underwriter, to serve as the primary dealer for
reverse repurchase transactions
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-40, Designating a
Districts' Treasurer and Authorizing the Districts'
Treasurer and the Orange County Tax-Collector-Treasurer
to Invest and/or Reinvest Districts' Funds. See page I
(c) Consideration of motion approving Statement of
Investment Policy for Funds Controlled by Districts'
Treasurer.
(d) Consideration of motion approving Reverse Repurchase
Agreement Guidelines/Master Repurchase Agreement
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to proceed with
a $50 million investment program and to report to
Directors on investment performance in accordance with
adopted policies and guidelines.
(f) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to lease the
Bloomberg financial reporting system.
[ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 71 �...�
-6-
04/14/93
`./ (11) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6)
(b) (3) Consideration of the following actions relative to Fixed Floating
Interest Rate Swap 11993 SWAP):
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to proceed with
preliminary 1993 SWAP structuring, utilizing underwriters
Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber on a fee contingency
basis, subject to final authorization by the Boards to
conduct the transaction
Ib) Consideration of motion directing staff and General
Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide special
bond counsel services for the 1993 SWAP for
consideration by the Boards
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to Standard and Poor's Rating Agency for
review of 1993 SWAP structures in an amount not to
exceed $30,000.
(d) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to Moody's Rating Agency for review of
1993 SWAP structures in an amount not to exceed
$30,000.
(4) Consideration of the following actions relative to Advanced
Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series I:
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff and Merrill
Lynch to proceed with preliminary steps necessary to
structure and bring to market the 1993 Series I, on a fee
contingency basis, subject to final authorization by the
Boards to conduct the transaction.
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff and General
Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide special
bond counsel services for the 1993 Series I for
consideration by the Boards.
(5) Consideration of the following actions relative to Course of
Construction Master Program:
(a) Consideration of motion directing staff and Robert F.
Driver Company to implement the Master Course of
�..✓ Construction Program
(ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 81
-7-
04/14/93
(11) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from page 7)
(b) (5) (b) Consideration of motion appointing Zurich Insurance
Company as the insurance carrier for the Master Course
of Construction Program, at an estimated annual
premium not to exceed $125,625.00 in accordance with
terms summarized below:
PREMIUM RATE: $.125 per $100 per year
LIMITS: $45,000,000 per Occurrence
Sublimits:
Earthquake: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence
and Annual Aggregate
Flood: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence
and Annual Aggregate
Transit: $500,000
Offsite Storage: $500,000
Debris Removal: $5,000,000
Expediting Expense: $250,000
Extra Expense: $1,000,000
DEDUCTIBLES:
All Other Perils: $10,000
Flood: $50,000
Earthquake: 5% of values at risk at time of
loss subject to $100,000
minimum.
TOTAL INSURABLE VALUES: $100,500,000
[ITEM (11)(b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 91
-8-
04/14/93
...
(11) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from page B)
(b) (6) Consideration of the following actions relative to Biofiltration
Demonstration Project, amending November 18, 1992 action as
follows:
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager
to execute a grant agreement with the Southern
California Edison Company for partial funding of said
project in the amount of $50,000.00.
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager
to execute a specific-term employment agreement with
Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering services for said project
for up to a twelve-month period, at an hourly rate of
$21.63 per hour, for a maximum amount not to exceed
$45,000.00.
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to proceed with
the Biofiltration Demonstration Project.
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Building Committee and consideration of motion to
receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the
meeting on March 18, 1993 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda
material)
(b) Consideration of action on the following item recommended by the
Building Committee:
(1) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-41, approving plans and
specifications for Office Trailer Relocation at Plants Nos. 1 and
2, Specification No. M-044, and authorizing the General
Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids (tentative bid
date May 11, 1993). See page M
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee and
consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's
written report of the meeting on March 25, 1993 (Copy enclosed with
Directors' agenda material).
[ITEM (13)(B) CONTINUED ON PAGE 101
-9-
04/14/93
(13) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from page 9)
(b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by the
Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee:
(1) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to complete
negotiations for an agreement with the OCWD in form approved
by General Counsel that would provide up to 50 mgd of
secondary effluent to the OCWD for recycling purposes at no
charge, with a provision to, at any time, reevaluate the
valuation and pricing for secondary effluent; and to provide for
purchase of GAP water for 20 years at the audited cost to
operate and maintain the GAP facility. (The current 0&M cost
is $460.50 per mg or $150 per AF.) The contract would
provide that the Districts' cost would not exceed the 0&M cost
or the lowest cost of any GAP customer, whichever is less.
(2) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to execute an
agreement with OCWD for pilot plant testing of UV light
disinfection technology, with estimated $180,000 costs to be
shared equally in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the
Districts' portion of out-of-pocket costs for outside consulting
services, and $40,000 for the Districts' in-house laboratory
services.
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of the following actions relative to Secondary Treatment
Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2:
(a) Verbal report of Staff
(b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for said project, clarifying miscellaneous mechanical and
electrical items.
(c) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and
specifications for said project, making miscellaneous clarifications.
(d) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 3 to the plans and
specifications, making changes to the General and Special Provisions
re Insurance Requirements.
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-42, receiving and filing bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Secondary
Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2 to Margate �...�
Construction, Inc., in the total amount of $14,496,000.00. See page
N
-10-
04/14/93
1151 ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of the following actions relative to Priority Projects Element of
Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1:
(a) Verbal report of Staff
(b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and
specifications for said project, changing the bid date and establishing
a date and time for job walk.
jcl Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and
specifications for said project, making miscellaneous technical
clarifications.
(d) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-43, receiving and filing bid
tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Priority
Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total
amount of $3,398,000.00. See page Q .
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers
and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the
Committee's written report of the meeting on March 30, 1993 (Copy
enclosed with Directors' agenda material).
(b) Consideration of action on the following Items recommended by the
Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers:
11) Approve the three-phase approach for the Computerized
Facilities Records and Drawings Systems, Job No. J-25-1, and
authorize preceding with implementation.
(2) Authorize the Special Selection Committee Re Computers to
solicit proposals and negotiate Professional Services Contractls)
for the phased approached for consideration by the Boards.
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business
set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards,
the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to
consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel
matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or
54957.6.
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b)
matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee
compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure
under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by
the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not
available for public inspection. At such time as final actions
are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the
minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information.
11
04/14/93
(17) ALL DISTRICTS - (Continued from page 11) -
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) Reconvene in regular session
(c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed
session.
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(19) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(20) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(21) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(22) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(23) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(24) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(25) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(26) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(27) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(28) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(29) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(30) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-12-
04/14/93
(31) DISTRICT 13
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(32) DISTRICT 13
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(33) DISTRICT 14
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(34) DISTRICT 14
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(35) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of actions pertaining to request to reduce sewer connection
fees for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton:
(a) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated April 7,
1993. Seepage P
(b) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter dated March 17,
1993, from Jan Development Co., requesting reduction of connection
fees (attached to Staff Report).
�..✓ (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter dated March 18,
1993, from District Chairman Sal Sapien requesting consideration of a
reduction of connection fees for said project (attached to Staff
Report).
(d) Discussion
(a) Consideration of action(s) on request to reduce sewer connection fees
(36) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any
(37) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-13-
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127.108"Ellis Avenue
of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92728-9127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
APRIL 14, 1993 AT 7:30 P.M.
The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine
items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-
explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the
bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS
9(a): AWARD PURCHASE OF ONE STEAM STERILIZER UNIT (AUTOCLAVE).
�./ SPECIFICATION NO. E-226 (REVISED.
An autoclave is needed by the Molecular Microbiology section of the
Laboratory Division to replace the existing unit which is twenty-two years old. The
existing equipment, due to its age, undergoes continuous maintenance which often
leaves it unavailable for sterilizing media and labware as well as destroying
pathogenic microorganisms necessary for safe disposal. Complete ultraclean
sterilization is critical to the molecular biology research and development work.
Funds have been allocated for a modern steam sterilizer in the 1992-93 capital
equipment budget.
On Tuesday, March 16, 1993, sealed bids were received for purchase of
a new autoclave. Three bids and one "no bid" were received. The bids ranged
from a low of $27,145.00 to a high bid of $36,575.00, plus applicable sales tax.
A copy of the bid tabulation and recommendation is attached to the supporting
agenda material.
Staff recommends that award be made to American Sterilizer Company,
the lowest responsible bidder, for One Steam Sterilizer Unit (Autoclave),
Specification No. E-226 (Revised), for an amount not to exceed $27,145.00, plus
applicable sales tax.
April 14, 1993
9(b): PURCHASE OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPH/MASS SPECTROMETER
SYSTEM. SPECIFICATION NO. E-228.
The Laboratory is responsible for performing analyses of wastewater,
industrial source control, ocean monitoring and sludge samples in support of the
various activities of the Districts. Gas chromatograph/mass spectrometry (GC/MS)
is one of the most basic and powerful instruments for the identification and
quantification of organic compounds in these samples.
Currently, the Laboratory analyzes industrial source control and NPDES
samples for 31 volatile organic compounds following EPA Method 601/602. This
method utilizes a gas chromatograph equipped with two detectors in series, a
photo ionization detector (PID) and an electrolytic conductivity detector (ELCD).
However, according to EPA Method 601/602, positive identification and
confirmation of these volatile compounds requires the detection of each compound
on either two different detectors or by GC/MS. Only 12 of the original 31 volatile
compounds are actually detected by our present PID plus ELCD system. Also,
there are an additional 12 compounds that are not identified by this system that
can be analyzed using GC/MS technology. The PID and ELCD detectors require
time-intensive weekly maintenance which results in considerable downtime for the
instruments and delays sample analyses. Laboratory personnel spend
approximately five hours per week performing this maintenance which results in an
annual cost of about 48,500. Moreover, stability characteristics of the PID and
ELCD require weekly external standard calibration and the volatile standards are
expensive and unstable. Six standard mixtures at $30 per ampule are prepared on
a weekly basis throughout the year. This represents a cost of over $9,000/year for
the purchase of volatile standards for Method 601/602.
Three GC/MS systems were evaluated; the Hewlett Packard 5972 GC/MS
system (an updated version of the 5971), the Varian Saturn, and the VG Fisons
MD800. The Varian system was rejected because it utilizes ion trap technology
which is not EPA-approved for Method 624. The Fisons MD800 system costs
463,390 plus tax and freight and was rejected because it utilizes a four-rod
quadrupole that makes it susceptible to misalignment problems. The Hewlett
Packard 5972 GC/MS system costs $62,000 plus tax and represents a cost
savings of $1,390. The Hewlett Packard 5972 GC/MS system is recommended
because of the detector's past performance in our Laboratory and the following
proprietary qualifications:
-2.
April 14, 1993
1) This system is equipped with a patented, proprietary one-piece
quadrupole mass spectrometer. This major design advantage
eliminates the drift and misalignment problems commonly
encountered with conventional four-rod quadrupole designs.
2) This system is equipped with a patented, proprietary quartz Ion
focus lens. This lens system prevents contamination from entering
the quadrupole by screening our contaminants before they enter the
quadrupole and provides for very rapid cleaning and replacement.
Since this instrument will be used for very "dirty" samples, this
option will considerably reduce the downtime associated with
system maintenance.
3) This system is equipped with electronic pressure control of carrier
gas eliminating pressure pulses during injection, resulting in
improved instrument performance.
4) This instrument is equipped with dual filaments that are computer
selected. This feature reduces downtime due to changing of burned
out filaments because it does not require shutting down the
Instrument when the first filament burns out. Shutting down and
restarting the system requires several hours.
5) The system software is compatible with the existing system and
operates in the Windows environment which provides a common
interface and user environment. Also, this software autotunes the
mass spectrometer to specifications required by EPA criteria, saving
analyst time required for manual tuning.
6) Our existing support equipment is a Tekmar purge and trap
concentrator and two sixteen-sample position autosampler and is
completely compatible with the Hewlett Packard 5972 GC/MS
system.
Based on the savings for the maintenance of the PID and ELCD detectors
($8,500/year) and the savings in calibration solutions ($9,000/year), the payback
period for this system would be approximately 3.5 years.
Staff therefore recommends a Hewlett Packard 5972 model for the
Purchase of Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer System, Specification No. E-228,
from the Hewlett Packard Company, for an amount not to exceed $62,000.00,
plus tax and freight.
-3-
April 14, 1993
9(c): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO 4 TO INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND
UTILITY CORRIDOR, JOB NO. 1-9. AND REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF
STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB NO. J-22-2.
Job No. 1-9, Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, provides for
construction of a new 120-Inch effluent pipeline connecting Reclamation Plant
No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2. This $21.3 million project also includes
Installation of a new fiber-optic communications cable system between the Control
Centers at Plant 1 and Plant 2, and installation of a new digester gas pipeline and
industrial water pipeline. Job No. J-22-2, Replacement of Portion of Standby
Ocean Outfali, increases the size of the old standby ocean outfall pipeline within
Plant 2 from 78 inches to 120 Inches and Increases the capacity of the natural gas
service to serve the new co-generation facility. Change Order No. 4 adds
$83,741.00 and 14 calendar days to the contract with Colich and Sons.
Job No. 1-9
Item 1 adds $74,536.00 to the contract for emergency repairs made to
the existing 84-inch interplant reinforced concrete pipeline south of the effluent
junction box (EJB) at Garfield Avenue, in the west levee of the Santa Ana River. A
leak in this pipeline was discovered late last Fall. Colich and Sons, the contractor,
had the necessary equipment on site to do this work and with the approaching
winter storms, an immediate repair to this line, built in 1965, was necessary.
The repair of the pipe was completed in a two-phase process. The first
phase involved stabilizing the ground below the 84-inch RCP by pressure grouting.
(This work was accomplished by a specialty grouting contractor and payment was
issued under a separate purchase order not associated with this contract.) The
second phase of the repairs involved excavation and shoring In order to provide
access through the south side of the EJB, structural repairs to the 84-inch RCP,
installation and removal of an extensive dewatering system to control both ground
water, and diversion of effluent from the EJB. This item Includes all costs for the
second phase repair. The majority of this emergency work was performed during
the months of December 1992 and January 1993 and was interrupted several
times due to the heavy rains.
Item 2 reduces the amount of retention on the contract progress
payments from ten percent (10%) to a total fixed amount of $1,000,000.00 (about
4-1/2% of the ultimate contract amount) for the remainder of the project. This is
being done for a couple of reasons. First, in consideration of the fact that a
markup of only 5% was charged in Item 1, whereas Section 10-6 of the Districts'
-4-
April 14, 1993
..i General Provisions allows a 15% mark-up on labor and materials. In addition, the
contract is presently over eighty percent (80%) complete and the Districts have
taken beneficial occupancy of two thirds of the completed 120-inch RCP interplant
pipeline for use as emergency storage of effluent in storm conditions, if needed.
Item 3 is a time extension of 14 days due to inclement weather
conditions. The contract included an allowance for inclement weather; the 14 days
is an increase for days exceeding the allowance.
Job No. J-22-2
Item 4 adds $8,566.00 to the contract for a differential sales tax
adjustment on materials purchased from October 1992 through January 1993.
Because a state sales tax increase was rumored during preparation of the contract
bidding documents, and the project included large material purchases, a stipulation
was included that the bid was to be based on a 6.5% sales tax rate. It also stated
that the contractor could recover any increase in actual sales tax over 6.5% on
purchased materials during the life of the contract. The plans and specifications for
the project were approved at the meeting of the Joint Boards on January 9, 1991
and a state sales tax increase went into effect on July 15, 1991. The present
sales tax rate of Los Angeles County is 8.25%, with Orange County and Riverside
County at 7.75%. Approximately 80% of the materials, which include the large
120-inch reinforced concrete pipe, are being purchased from Hydro Conduit
Corporation in Riverside County. Approximately 15% of the materials, including
specified pipe bedding materials, are being purchased in Orange County. The sales
tax adjustment was calculated from purchase invoices. Some additional sales tax
increases for materials purchases are expected for this job and Job No. 1-9 and will
be paid for on a future change order.
Item 5 adds $639.00 to the contract for removal and capping of an
existing 6-inch natural gas pipeline found to be in conflict with construction of the
new 120-inch reinforced concrete ocean outfall pipeline. It was necessary to
remove interfering portions of the existing gas pipe in order to continue with
excavation and placement of the new 120-inch sewer pipe.
If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change
orders to date on this contract will be $324,666.00 with 14 calendar days time
extension. This represents an increase of 1.52% over the original contract
amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 4 adding $83,741 .00
and 14 calendar days to the contract with Colich and Sons.
-5-
April 14, 1993
91d1: APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 20 TO CENTRAL POWER
GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1 .
Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, is part
of the $70 million master-planned Central Power Generation System which is being
built under several contracts at both plants. This $16.6 million contract includes
installation of three pre-purchased digester gas burning, spark-ignited, 3472
horsepower engines with generators which are each capable of producing 2500
kilowatts of electrical power. Change Order No. 20 adds $53,586.00 for twelve
items of additional work. Essentially, this contract is now complete.
Item 1, in the amount of $14,519.00, is for providing one five-micron
natural gas filtering station for each of the three gas driven engines in the Central
Power Generation Facility. As previously reported to the Directors, these filters are
not required in the contract documents but are recommended by the engine
manufacturer and the Districts' consulting engine expert, Advanced Engine
Technologies Corporation (AETC)•
Item 2, a no-cost item, assigns values for the remaining contract
retention into eight milestone events required to complete the project. The
respective assigned retention amount will be released to the contractor upon
completion of each milestone. The milestones are the result of changed start-up
requirements pertaining to resolution of the engine issue with the manufacturer,
Cooper, as previously reviewed by the Boards. Item 3, in the amount of
$4,912.00, is for providing a temporary shelter for Districts'-supplied electrical load
banks required for load testing of the engine generator sets. Initial testing will be
against the load banks to avoid possible plant interruptions. The load banks must
be located outside and require protection from weather. Item 4, in the amount of
$609.00, is for providing additional safety signs inside the Central Power
Generation Facility to help protect employees from hot equipment, excessive noise,
and to prohibit smoking to prevent possible explosions in hazardous areas. Item 5,
in the net amount of $3,290.00, is for providing raceway and cable for absorption
chiller controls which were not specifically defined in the contract documents. This
item includes a credit for raceway and cable shown in the contract documents but
no longer required under the final controls design.
Item 6, in the amount of $6,676,00, is for chemical treatment of water in
each engine jacket water, heat recovery, steam condensate, boiler feedwater, hot
water, and chilled water systems to prevent scaling and corrosion inside the piping
and equipment. Item 7, in the amount of $1,679.00, is for providing connection of
the steam and heat reservoir piping systems into the existing plant piping systems.
These connections are not shown in the contract documents but are required to
-6-
April 14, 1993
operate these systems inside the Central Power Generation Facility. Item 8, in the
amount of $9,942.00, is for providing support for the original equipment lubricating
oil filter test performed by the Districts' consulting engine expert, AETC. This test
was performed to determine if the filters specified by Cooper function as intended
by the engine manufacturer. Preliminary reports on the results indicate that the
filters do not function as intended and, as the Directors are aware, that issue is
currently being addressed with Cooper.
Item 9, in the amount of $1,988.00, is for fire alarm system control panel
modifications required to operate the duct-mounted smoke detector located in the
HVAC Room necessary to provide interlocking with Air Handling Unit 3 to
shutdown the fan in the event of a fire. The conduit and wiring were not shown in
the contract documents. Item 10, in the amount of $449.00, is for providing 120
VAC control power for the automatic governor loading controls located in the
medium voltage switchgear. This work is not shown in the contract documents
but is required to operate the loading controls which are needed for parallel
operation of generators. Item 11, in the amount of $7,342.00, is for removing and
rerouting 12 KV conduit. The existing raceways at Tunnel Intersection H for these
circuits are incorrectly shown on the contract drawings. This item also includes
additional conduit for control wiring to the medium voltage switchgear located in
the Electric Service Center. Southern California Edison will not allow this wiring to
be routed through their enclosures as shown on the contract drawings.
Item 12, in the amount of $2,280.00, is for work involved in relocating
the 12 KV electrical pull box located in the basement of the Central Power
Generation Facility into Intersection I of Tunnel No. 6. Conflicts with adjacent
piping systems inside the basement rendered use of the electrical pull box
impractical. Staff recommended moving the box into the tunnel intersection where
more access is available to pull both contract-specified and future cables through
the box. Because the move benefitted the contractor, the contractor provided fifty
percent (50%) of the labor and materials required to move the box at no cost.
Except for Items 11 and 12, the above described changes would have
been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase.
Portion of Items 11 and 12 involve rework. If the Directors approve this change
order, the total cost of the change orders, to date on this contract, will be
$1,255,088.00 with 268 calendar days time extension. This represents an
increase of 8.14% over the original contract amount. Of this amount, 1.55%
represents the cost of correcting deficiencies in the gas-driven engines and related
equipment which were improperly manufactured and prepared for storage by the
engine manufacturer which has been previously reported to the Directors.
-7-
April 14, 1993
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 20 adding $53,586.00
to the contract with Hunter Corporation. There is no time extension associated
with this change order.
9(e): AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM
NO. 2 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN
CAROLLO ENGINEERS RE SECONDARY TREATMENT IMPROVEMENTS
AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P11-36. AND SECONDARY TREATMENT
EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. 132-42.
In October 1989, the Directors awarded a professional services
agreement for preparation of plans and specifications for design and construction
support services to expand the secondary treatment facilities' capacity from 46
million gallons per day (MGD) to 80 MGD at Plant No. 1, and from 75 MGD to 90
MGD at Plant No. 2. This design and construction effort includes extensive
structural and mechanical modifications to existing facilities, expansion of
secondary facilities and provides for various miscellaneous support facilities. Job
No. P7-36, the secondary treatment expansion at Plant No. 1, is under design with
completion scheduled this year. Job No. P2-42, the secondary expansion at Plant
No. 2, is divided into two contracts; Job No. P2-42-1 is the electrification of pump
drives at Plant No. 2 and 132-42-2 is the secondary treatment expansion. Job No.
P2-42-2 was bid in March and award of a construction contract is recommended
under a separate item (see Item 14.)
As the design for the Plant No. 1 secondary treatment expansion has
progressed, several modifications and changes have been identified that staff
believes will enhance the treatment process, provide operational flexibility, increase
reliability and improve our ability to continue to meet our NPDES Ocean Discharge
Permit requirements imposed by the U.S. EPA and the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board. These Include: a) modifications to the existing air diffusion
headers; b) provide an automatic influent control system; c) increase return
activated sludge flow rates; and d) provide pumping flexibility in the plant effluent
pump station.
The major change is the proposed modification of the air diffusion
headers. During the activated sludge secondary treatment process, air is
introduced into the wastewater in huge aerator basins to stimulate the biological
removal of pollutants. There are several types of devices that can be used to help
attain broad diffusion of the air with the wastewater. During the preliminary design
-8-
April 14, 1993
�..i of the system expansion at Plant No. 1, it was proposed to use the same type of
air diffusers that are currently utilized in the Plant No. 1 secondary treatment
facility. The existing system, which has worked very well, uses a round membrane
tube, or "sock" design to diffuse the air.
Because the air diffusion is so critical to effectiveness and efficiency of
the secondary treatment process, the Operations and Engineering staffs are
recommending that the consultant investigate, test a new flat plate design to
determine if an alternative to the existing system could result in substantial savings
in future energy costs and more effective treatment removal rates. (This is not an
issue at Plant No. 2 because that plant uses pure oxygen in its secondary treatment
system rather than air.)
The proposed new work would include a detailed study of the
performance of the new plate design at other facilities, and a report on the
economics related to power savings that could be expected. Since there are no
two treatment plants with identical sewage characteristics or operating modes, a
pilot study is also advisable. The engineer would also provide support for a pilot
project to test the plate diffusers. If the tests determine that a new device is
appropriate, it would be designed into the existing basins when the final P1-36
project is let for bidding, in about one year.
`j Staff is therefore recommending that the Selection Committee be
authorized to negotiate Addendum No. 2 with John Carollo Engineers to change the
scope of work to provide the additional engineering services for the design of
Secondary Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-36, and Secondary
Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, to include the above described
work. Fallowing the Selection Committee's negotiations, the proposed addendum
will be presented to the Boards for consideration.
9(f): AUTHORIZE SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND
NEGOTIATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR CHEMICAL
AND WASTEHAULER FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB
NO. P7-46, AND CHEMICAL AND PLANT WATER FACILITY
MODIFICATIONS AT PLANT NO, 2. JOB NO, P2-55.
This project is a continuation of a series of projects to modify or upgrade
existing facilities to eliminate hazards, improve reliability and efficiency and
accommodate future master-planned construction. This project will provide
-9-
April 14, 1993
alternate chemicals to replace gaseous chlorine applications now used In the
treatment plants; modifications to our wastehauler receiving facilities to correct
deficiencies and improve operational flexibility and reliability; and improvements to
our plant water facilities and digester gas compressors.
Elimination of Gaseous Chlorine. Chlorine is a very hazardous substance
that is widely used at the Districts' facilities and treatment plants worldwide for
odor control and disinfection. Recently published standards revisions contain
requirements which may restrict Its use but still not eliminate the potential of a
calamity from a major leak. The Districts have tested alternative chemicals and are
currently using bleach as a substitute in some foul air scrubbers and are testing
hydrogen peroxide for odor control in the plant influent. The proposed project will
Investigate using alternative chemicals for all chlorine applications in the treatment
plants.
Wastehauler Facility Modifications. At Plant No. 1, we have a dump
facility that accepts pumped wastes from septic systems as well as certain high-
solids industrial waste that are trucked to the plant by wastehaulers. It is the only
one of its kind in the area. Although our wastehauler dump facility is relatively
new, it has experienced continual problems because of clogging of the system
which results in high maintenance. When the system was designed the significant
amount of debris that is often in the trucked wastes was unknown. The project
consultant will investigate Innovative dump methods and alternatives, contents of
waste, and recommend modifications to allow us to more readily accommodate the
waste on a continuing basis. A secondary system for placing certain high-strength
waste directly into the sludge digesters will also be considered to determine if It
would be more efficient. Improvements to control odors and security will also be
modified as necessary.
Plant Water Supply. At Plant No. 2, current plant water (secondary
treated wastewater) used for operational requirements averages 7.5 million gallons
per day (mgd), with a range reported in December 1992 of 5.58 mgd to 9.09 mgd.
This water has many uses, including cooling, heating and washing. The plant
water source is currently secondary effluent from Plant No. 1. Recently, the Plant
No. 1 effluent was routed to the 84-inch Interplant line from an old 42-inch line and
the 42-inch line has been demolished to make way for the new interplant utility
construction project, Job No. 1-9, now nearly complete. With the diversion of the
secondary effluent to the 84-inch interplant line and combination of this flow with
primary effluent, a decrease in plant water quality has been observed at Plant No. 2
which has impacted the operational and maintenance reliability of systems using
the plant water.
-10-
April 14, 1993
It is therefore proposed to evaluate and recommend alternatives to
provide secondary effluent from the Plant No. 2 secondary facility. Items for
consideration will include gravity and pump facilities, filtration, constructability and
costs. The evaluation will also address the effects of a new filtration system to be
installed at the existing plant water station (Job No. P2-43-1) on the quality of the
plant water.
Diaester Gas Cornoressors. An evaluation of the plant water used for
cooling digester gas compressors is proposed to determine the feasibility of
providing an improved cooling system to extend the service life of the compressors.
The plant water now used for cooling, partly because of the water quality problem
discussed above, may not be the best cooling source. Alternatives include a closed
loop cooling system for the digester gas compressors with filtration and chemical
treatment. The evaluation will address water quality and flow requirements and
determine the best water source for the cooling system.
Staff is recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to
solicit proposals and negotiate a professional services agreement providing for
engineering evaluation, preparation of design and plans and specifications, for
Chemical and Wastehauler Facility Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-46,
and Chemical and Plant Water Facility Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55.
Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the agreement will be presented
�..i to the Directors for consideration.
9(g): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND
APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH CH2M HILL
FOR EXPANSION OF EXISTING COMPUTERIZED MONITORING AND
CONTROL SYSTEMS AT PLANTS 1 AND 2. JOB NO, J-31 .
Over the past few years the Directors have approved contracts to install
computer systems to monitor and operate various portions of the treatment plant
processes. These include the control system for the Ocean Outfall Booster Station
(OOBS) at Plant No. 2, a new pump station telemetry system for outlying pumping
stations, replacement of the existing obsolete computer monitoring system at Plant
No. 2, and a new computer monitoring system for Plant No. 1. The Districts
currently operate 31 local computer control systems installed under several
different plant projects.
The largest of the Districts' computer instrumentation projects are Jobs
Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44, Plant 1 Control Center Instrumentation and Replacement of
Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, respectively, bid together at a
cost of $3.8 million. This project is now underway. When completed, this
-11-
April 14, 1993
baseline system will allow access to different process monitoring units from various
locations throughout the plants and provide an orderly method to sound necessary
alarms and store process data. However, additional work is needed to complete
the system, including the intertie of the 31 existing and planned additional
computer monitoring systems. This work was not included in the original contract
because all of the systems were not complete and there was no way of knowing
exactly what would be required until now.
It now appears that this work could best be combined with other needed
work, including the upgrade of the control system for OOBS. It is also
recommended that computer graphics, representing new plant processes which
have been added since the J-23-2 and P2-44 supervisory control and data
acquisition (SCADA) project was awarded, be added to assist staff in operating and
controlling the facilities.
About five years ago, the OOBS control system was installed. Since
then, the control system has not met expectations. The system was installed
under Job No. J-15A, which has yet to be accepted by the Directors because of
several outstanding items, all of which are being resolved with the contractor.
However, the specific computer control system is based on now-outdated
technologies and, in fact, various pieces of hardware already cannot be replaced
because manufacturers no longer make the parts. Therefore, it may be less costly
to replace the system than continue to maintain it. (We have not paid the original
contractor for this work, reserving funds to insure that deficient portions, or the
complete system, can be replaced.)
Jobs Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 include the installation of new computer
monitoring systems. The specifications for those projects required that the
contractor install equipment which could receive and deliver messages to and from
the OOBS computer control system. This requirement was common to each
manufacturer who bid the project, i.e., each has a different language and had to
interlink their system with the existing OOBS system. Since the OOBS computer
control system is not satisfactory, staff believes it would compound the OOBS
problems to tie the system into the Districts-wide monitoring computer network.
Therefore, in December 1992, the intertie was deleted and a credit for $87,438.00
was received.
The credit for deleting the intertie to the OOBS computer control system,
added to the cost of replacing worn out hardware, is approximately equal to the
cost of designing and building a simpler system using the most modern technology;
that is, programmable logic computer-based control equipment (PLCs). Our staff is
familiar with PLC equipment since we have about thirty separate functions now in
-12-
April 14, 1993
�./ progress using the PLCs. Parts replacement is much simpler: there are no hard
drives as the older GOBS computer control systems contain. Therefore, staff
believes that the GOBS project should be reanalyzed by control systems engineers
who can make recommendations about whether the staff position is correct and
find the most economical way to upgrade the reliability of the existing OOBS
control system, either by repair or replacement.
To address these issues, in January the Directors authorized the Selection
Committee to solicit proposals for a professional services agreement for Expansion
of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job
No. J-31.
The Selection Committee has negotiated a professional services
agreement with CH2M Hill to prepare the design plans and specifications, and
provide construction support services, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus
direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, for an amount not to exceed
$690,148.00.
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and
adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with CH2M
Hill. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the supporting
�./ agenda documents.
9(h): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND
APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN
CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR STANDBY POWER RELIABILITY
MODIFICATIONS. JOB NO. J-33, AND OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY
UPGRADES. JOB NO. J-34.
At the regular meeting in December, the Directors received a report from
staff regarding the major impacts on our facilities of the intense rain storm which
passed through Orange County on December 7, 1992. That storm produced the
highest flows ever treated through the plant, a rate of 485 million gallons per day,
sustained for about two hours. Staff was very pleased that the facilities were able
to handle this flow without major incident, nonetheless we have had several
debriefing meetings to analyze the storm effects and the operational lessons that
could be learned from the storm and where our system needs improvement to
minimize potential failures during emergency situations such as were experienced
on December 7.
-13-
April 14, 1993
As part of that exercise, we have anticipated, based on the most current
information, what might have happened if certain critical facilities failed. The key
to keeping our treatment plants operating and to avoiding pollution during natural or
man-made emergency situations is system reliability and redundancy. The
Directors have repeatedly supported this concept and its importance. Our
standards provide for backup equipment at every level, as well as several sources
of power to ensure service under the most difficult circumstances. Electrical
outages, for instance, are most likely to occur during a severe storm event.
Because of that, the Districts have two sources of Edison power at each plant plus
standby electrical generation. Soon our power supply will have even higher
reliability when the Central Power Generation project is on line.
Nonetheless, because of the December 7 storm experience, staff
evaluations have identified the need for increased standby power at various critical
locations within both plants, including the outfall disposal facilities. The first is the
addition to and modification of existing standby electrical and engine-driven
equipment. The standby power work will include critical deployment of new and
existing standby generators, the securing of the necessary South Coast Air Quality
Management District permits for this equipment, providing two sources of fuel to
standby engines used to drive standby pumps, and other work to increase electrical
reliability. The second is modifications to our standby ocean outfall (old Ocean
Outfall No. 1), including raising the height and seismic strengthening of the older of
the two surge towers on the outfall system. The ocean outfall modifications would
be largely structural. The work would include a re-valving and re-piping adjacent to
the older surge tower, raising the height of the surge tower, and changes to our
California Regional Water Quality Control Board/U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit to allow use of our standby outfall in an
extreme storm situation. By using the standby ocean outfall, the Districts would be
able to safely increase the treatment plant flow-through.
In January, because of the urgency of these projects, the Directors
authorized the Selection Committee to negotiate with John Carollo Engineers for
this work. Carollo has a blend of experience and expertise which should allow this
important project to move at an accelerated pace. Carollo prepared that portion of
our 1989 Master Plan which deals with both these issues. They have performed
past designs for the Districts which are very similar and were successfully
completed. Those projects include the raising of Surge Tower No. 1, the design of
our Ocean Outfall system and several projects to increase electrical reliability
including standby power generating equipment facilities. The estimated
construction cost for both projects, Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job
No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34, is $20 million. A
project report will be prepared on all the work items, with design following on
-14-
April 14, 1993
�./ about half the work. The remaining portion of the work will be Identified in the
project report for future design, and the fees for that design work will be
negotiated separately.
The Selection Committee has negotiated a fee for the engineering
services with John Carollo Engineers, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus
direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, for an amount not to exceed
$950,252.00.
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and
adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with John
Carollo Engineers. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the
supporting agenda documents.
DISTRICTS 1 AND 7
9(i): AUTHORIZING SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND
NEGOTIATE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR GISLER-RED
HILL PARALLEL FORCE MAIN, FROM COLLEGE AVENUE PUMP STATION
TO IOWA STREET, CONTRACT NO, 7-23.
The College Avenue Pump Station and Force Main, Contract No. 7-1C,
was constructed in 1967 and delivers flow from the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer,
Contract No. 7-1 B, south of and parallel to the 405 Freeway, to the Gisler-Red Hill
Trunk Sewer (Schedule C). The pump station, located on College Avenue at Gisler
Avenue, about 1/4-mile east of Harbor Boulevard, serves portions of the cities of
Irvine, Tustin, Costa Mesa and Santa Ana. The single force main includes 1,833
linear feet of 21-inch Techite pipe in Gisler Avenue from College Avenue to east of
Iowa Street. Between 1967 and 1982, the Districts used Techite pipe as an
alternate material for force main construction. In the past two years, the Districts
have experienced failures in the Techite pipe force mains. The Districts have since
learned that others have also experience problems with the pipe and that Techite
pipe manufacturer's claims regarding the pipe's quality are false.
Mr. David Griffin, an attorney specializing in Techite pipe failure cases,
was retained to review the potential of recovering costs from the manufacturers of
Techite pipe. At a special Districts 3 and 7 Adjourned Board Meeting in January,
the Directors authorized funds to allow staff and counsel to take samples of the
Techite pipe; prepare's brief; and, if the testing supports it, file a claim against the
Techite pipe manufacturer.
-15-
April 14, 1993
Staff now believes that, based on the facts presented by Mr. Griffin in his
report, all Techite pipe Installed by the Districts' (including the College Avenue
Pump Station Force Main) should be replaced or taken out of service, as soon as
possible to minimize the potential for further failure.
The Districts are currently preparing plans for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor,
Contract No. 14-1-1A, part of which is in Gisler Avenue from Cinnamon Avenue
past Iowa Street. The Districts have incorporated the construction of a parallel
force main into the plans for the Baker-Gisler Interceptor, from Cinnamon Avenue
to the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer (Schedule C), approximately 700 linear feet.
This will avoid repeated, prolonged excavations in Gisler Avenue. This project will
be designed using a coated ductile iron pipe parallel force main for the remaining
length of the College Avenue Pump Station Force Main.
Staff recommends that the Directors authorize the Selection Committee
to solicit a proposal and negotiate a professional services agreement with Boyle
Engineering Corporation for the preparation of plans and specifications for Gisler-
Red Hill Parallel Force Main, from College Avenue Pump Station to Iowa Street,
Contract No. 7-23. Boyle is the designer of the much larger Baker-Gisler
Interceptor, into which portions of this work could easily be included. The
estimated cost of the new force main is $300,000.
DISTRICT 3
9(j): RECEIVE. FILE AND APPROVE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION
AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE KEITH
COMPANIES FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES RE
REPLACEMENT OF WESTMINSTER AVENUE FORCE MAINS. (FIRST AND
SECOND UNITS) AND NEW WESTSIDE PUMP STATION FORCE MAIN,
CONTRACT NO, 3-36R.
The western portion of District No. 3 drains to a collection system served
by the Seal Beach Pump Station located on the northeast corner of Seal Beach
Boulevard and Westminster Avenue. Wastewater from this system is pumped
easterly through a dual force main system to a gravity sewer located half-way
between Boise Chica Avenue and Springdale Avenue. Both force mains are made
of 30-Inch diameter Techite pipe. The first of these mains, the Westminster
Avenue Force Main, First Unit, Contract No. 3.13, was installed in 1970, the
Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, in 1978.
-16-
April 14, 1993
The most recent of several breaks in these lines occurred on August 19,
1991 . The same line previously broke a few hundred feet away in March 1990,
necessitating repairs at that time. (Repair kits are becoming exceedingly hard to
find because Techite pipe is no longer manufactured.) While replacing the most
heavily damaged 20-foot portion of the pipe, staff was able to view adjacent pipe
sections on both sides of the broken pipe and found them cracked as well.
In September 1991, the Directors authorized the Selection Committee to
solicit proposals and negotiate a professional services agreement for preparation of
a project report, plans and specifications, and to provide construction support
services for the Replacement of the Westminster Avenue Force Main, First Unit,
Contract No. 3-13R-2. That project has been held in abeyance pending a
determination on the condition of Unit 2. At an Adjourned District No. 3 Board
meeting on January 20, 1993, the Directors viewed a videotape of the
Westminster Avenue Force Main, Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, which showed
that both force mains need replacing.
At the Adjourned meeting of District No. 3 in January, the Directors
authorized staff to retain Special Counsel to prepare a claim against the
manufacturer for the replacement costs of the Westminster Avenue dual force
mains and to take samples necessary to support the claim. In addition, the
Directors authorized the issuance of purchase orders to two laboratories to perform
the analytical and forensic work. Staff prepared plans for the removal of a section
of each of the two force mains. Bids were received and a contract awarded to
Colich & Sons for the removal of the samples. The work is complete. The two
samples are being shipped to a laboratory in Colorado. It is expected that the
laboratory results will be received in about a month. The claim will then be
prepared by staff, General Counsel and Special Counsel, Mr. David Griffin.
The Selection Committee has negotiated a Professional Services
Agreement with The Keith Companies for preparation of a project report, plans and
specifications and construction support services, for an amount not to exceed
$85,683.00, based on hourly rates, plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultants fees and fixed profit.
The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection
Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and
adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with The
Keith Companies. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached the
supporting agenda documents.
-17-
April 14, 1993
ALL DISTRICTS
11 : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF FISCAL POLICY/EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEES.
The Fiscal Policy Committee met on March 17, 1993, and the Executive
Committee on February 24, 1993. Enclosed for the Directors are written reports
on their deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards.
12: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE.
The Building Committee met on March 18, 1993. Enclosed for the
Directors is a written report on the Committee's deliberations and recommendations
for consideration by the Boards.
13: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CONSERVATION.
RECLAMATION AND RECYCLE COMMITTEE.
The Conservation, Reclamation and Recycle Committee met on March 25,
1993. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations and
recommendations for consideration by the Boards.
14: APPROVE ADDENDA NOS. 1 . 2 AND 3 AND AWARD SECONDARY
TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-42-2.
In accordance with our 1989 Master Plan, construction plans and
specifications have been prepared for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2. In October 1989, the Directors authorized the design and
construction of a series of projects that will upgrade and expand the existing
secondary treatment capacity at both plants. Job No. P7-36, additional secondary
treatment at Plant No. 1, is currently under design and will be submitted to the
Directors for approval when plans, specifications and funding are in place.
In March, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for
construction of Job No. P2-42-2, which will extend the existing twelve secondary
treatment clarifiers at Plant No. 2 an additional 50 feet south, toward the Talbert
Flood Control Channel. This modification will provide additional treatment by using
more area for settling solids and produce a higher quality effluent while treating an
additional 15 million gallons per day (MGD), increasing the capacity from 75 to 90
MGD. Work also includes replacement of the clarifier internal mechanisms and
drives, constructing an additional dissolved air flotation thickener, rehabilitating
three existing dissolved air flotation thickeners and construction of a new waste
sidestream pump station.
-18.
April 14, 1993
Permits have been received from the South Coast Air Quality
Management District, Orange County EMA and the California Coastal Commission.
Other agencies involved in the permitting process were the California Department
of Fish and Game and the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife Services.
Permit requirements and our own environmental mitigation measures are Included in
the plans and specifications.
(1) Addendum No. 1
Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications modifies the
Schedule of Prices to include a separate line item for Builders' All-
Risk Insurance. Clarifications of structural, mechanical and electrical
items and corrections to miscellaneous Items In the bid documents
are Included.
(2) Addendum No. 2
Addendum No. 2 provides for further clarification of
miscellaneous mechanical and electrical items.
(3) Addendum No. 3
Addendum No. 3 makes changes to the insurance requirements
in the General and Special Provisions.
(4) Award Job No. 152-42-2
On March 16, 1993, six bids were received for Secondary
Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2. The bids
ranged from a high of $16,517,131 .00 to a low of $14,496,000.00
submitted by Margate Construction, Inc. A complete bid tabulation
and recommendation is attached with the supporting agenda
material.
Staff recommends approval of Addenda Nos. 1, 2 and 3, receiving and
filing the bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding a contract to Margate
Construction, Inc., for their low bid of $14,496,000,00. The engineer's estimate
was $22,000,000.
Ift./
-19-
April 14, 1993
15: APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 1 AND AWARD OF CONSTRUCTION OF \r
PRIORITY PROJECTS ELEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS
TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-43-1.
Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No.
P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No.
P2-43, include over 100 relatively small miscellaneous improvements to various
facilities throughout both treatment plants. The proposed improvements will
improve safety, process reliability and performance, and replace obsolete
equipment and systems with improved ones.
These items have been split between five smaller projects categorized as
higher priority projects at each plant, lower priority projects at each plant, and
security and landscaping improvements at Plant No. 1. This job, Priority Projects
Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, is the first in
the series of five construction projects to be ready for bidding.
There are forty-nine items of work included in these construction
documents. The following summarizes the larger items of work to be constructed:
- Walkways at the grit screws for improved maintenance access and
safety
- Platforms at the belt presses for improved maintenance access and
safety
Modifications at an effluent junction box for an emergency valve
bypass to the outfall pipe
Chemical storage tank containment areas to prevent contamination
- Walkways at the rectangular primary basins for improved operations
access and safety
- Paving for improved drainage in specified areas
- Bleach storage facility for the North Complex Foul Air Scrubbers
- Test meter facility for large flow meters
- Air filters for the fresh air supply to the Ocean Outfall Booster
Station
New strainers for the plant water system
- A bypass to the plant water pump station for added reliability
Rehabilitation of the truck wash facility
- Addition of a standby fan at the trunkline scrubbers
- Replacement of the demisting sections of the scrubbers
- Removal and replacement of asbestos insulated steam piping
- Addition of a caustic storage tank for venting of chlorine gas at the
chlorine station
-20-
April 14, 1993
- Handrails and stairs for improved access and safety at the circular
clarifiers
- Anionic emulsion polymer storage and feed facility.
The Directors approved the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-43-1
in March 1993.
(1) AddendumNo. 1
Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for this project set
forth a date and time for a job walk for the asbestos insulation removal
task and changed the bid date from March 11, 1993, to March 23,
1993.
(2) Addendum No. 2
Addendum No. 2 included numerous miscellaneous changes and
clarifications.
(3) Award of Job No. P2-43-1
On March 23, 1993, ten bids were received for the subject
..i construction project. The bids ranged from a high of $4,482,725.00
to a low of $3,398,000.00 submitted by Pascal & Ludwig Engineers. A
complete bid tabulation is attached to the agenda.
Staff recommends approval of Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 and award to
Pascal & Ludwig Engineers for their low bid of $3,398,000.00. The engineer's
estimate for the work was $4,800,000.
16: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPECIAL SELECTION
COMMITTEE RE COMPUTERIZATION.
The Special Joint Works Selection Committee Re Computerization met on
March 30, 1993. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations
and recommended action for consideration by the Boards.
-21-
April 14, 1993
17: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION.
From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed
session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending
litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public
disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation
where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing
item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the
regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards.
DISTRICT 3
35: CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO REDUCE SEWER CONNECTION FEES
FOR PARK STANTON PLACE SENIOR CITIZENS APARTMENTS.
Enclosed with the supporting agenda documents is a staff report and
copies of letters requesting consideration of a reduction in the sewer connection
fees for the Park Stanton Place Senior Citizens Apartments in the City of Stanton.
jeral
Ivester
pager
JWS:jt
-22-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
ui ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
108C ELL19 AVENUE
AD Box al.RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 11
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92929-8127
7141962-2411
March 24, 1993
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Meetina Date: March 24. 1993 - 5:30 o.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Director Gail Kerry
Evelyn Hart Vice Joint Chairman Betty Mrgudich, Rourke, Woodruff
Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman and Spradlin
Robert Richardson Chairman, District 1 James Parker, Rourke, Woodruff
Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 and Spradlin
John C. Cox, Jr. Chairman, District 5 Ed Long, Mudge Rose
James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Elke Chenevey, Merrill Lynch
Charles E. Puckett Chairman, District 7
Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 STAFF:
�..i John M. Gullixson Chairman, District 13
Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Roger R. Stanton County Supervisor Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering
William Steiner County Supervisor Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of
Absent: Maintenance
Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of
Buck Catlin Past Joint Chairman Operations
Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 2 Patti Gorzcyca, Financial Manager
Ed Torres, Air Quality Manager
1) Report and Recommendations of the Fiscal Policy Committee.
Fiscal Policy Committee Chairman Puckett reported that the Committee
met on March 17th and considered several items of business. Enclosed
is a copy of the Committee's report on their deliberations. The following
summarizes the recommended action items:
March 24, 1993
A. Advance Refunding Certificates of Participation 1992 Series -
Soecial Counsel Fees.
Mudge Rose was engaged to provide special bond counsel
services in connection with the Advanced Refunding Certificates
of Participation 1992 Series, on a per diem rate basis for an
amount not to exceed $110,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses.
Mr. Ed Long of Mudge Rose appeared before the Fiscal Policy
Committee and reported that the transaction had required a much
greater effort than originally anticipated and his firm had incurred
fees totaling $280,000, and the reasons therefore as described in
his letter of January 7, attached to the Fiscal Policy Committee
Report. Mr. Long requested that the Directors approve an
adjustment in the Mudge Rose fees to $180,000, and stated that
his firm would absorb the balance of $100,000.
The Fiscal Policy Committee deliberated the request of Mudge
Rose at considerable length and recommended to the Executive
Committee that the Boards respectfully deny the request for a fee
increase, and that payment be made in the amount of the original
contract fee of $110,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses.
Executive Committee Recommendation: Mr. Long met with the
Executive Committee in closed session and presented his request
for a fee increase; following which he was excused and the
Committee deliberated the Mudge Rose request at considerable
length.
The Executive Committee recommends that the Boards approve
an increase in the fee from $110,000 to $150,000, plus out-of-
pocket expenses, provided that Mudge Rose execute a waiver and
release of any and all other fees for this transaction.
B. Investment Management Policy and Reverse Repurchase
Agreements.
At the January 27th Executive Committee meeting Director Swan
asked for a review of the Districts' investment policy, now
administered solely by the County Treasurer, to determine the
2
March 24, 1993
desirability of providing staff with the flexibility of managing a
portion of the Districts' reserve fund investment portfolio, for the
following reasons:
- Such a program would not be unique and, in fact, is practiced by
many agencies in California.
- Based on the market history for the past five years the Districts
could expect to realize substantial annual investment interest
earnings from such a program. (Had such a program been in
place for the past 18 months, it would have earned additional
interest in the amount of $2.2 million.)
- The risks associated with such a program are no greater than
risks associated with the Districts' existing debt financing and
related transactions.
A report prepared by the Districts' financial team was reviewed by
the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Committee at their
February meetings and it was the consensus of the Directors that
implementation of such a program would be beneficial to the
Districts, and staff and counsel were directed to draft the
necessary implementation documents for review by the
Committee.
The Committee reviewed the various documents necessary to
implement the changes in the Districts' investment management
program; as well as a memorandum from Past Joint Chairman
A. B. Catlin, which raised several questions concerning such a
program, and the information provided by staff in response to
Director Catlin's questions. Staff also reported that they had
reviewed internal control requirements with the Districts'
independent auditing firm and referred to KPMG's letter. (Copies
attached to Fiscal Policy Committee Report.)
Staff also reported that the matter had been discussed at great
length with the Orange County Treasurer, who indicates support
for the reverse repurchase program which is the same practice he
utilizes and is largely responsible for his ability to realize such an
excellent record of investment returns for funds deposited in the
-3-
March 24, 1993
County's commingled investment pool. However, since
implementation of such a program contemplates the naming of
both a District Treasurer, as well as utilization of the County
Treasurer's services, Mr. Citron has requested that County
Counsel clarify whether or not that would impact the duties that
the County Treasurer provides on behalf of the Districts.
At the Executive Committee meeting staff and counsel reviewed
the County Treasurer's questions (see enclosed memorandum
from the General Counsel dated March 23, 1993 [gray]). A
resolution of this issue by County Counsel is anticipated prior to
the meeting of the Joint Boards on April 14th.
Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive
Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's
recommendation that a revised investment policy/reverse
repurchase policy be implemented by the following actions,
subject to satisfactory resolution of any questions by the Orange
County Treasurer pertaining to banking services provided by his
office on behalf of the Districts:
(1) Appoint Merrill Lynch, the Districts' underwriter who also
works closely with the County Treasurer's investment
program, to serve as the primary dealer for reverse
repurchase transactions. Merrill Lynch would charge no
remuneration on investments, since a spread is already
included in the price of the securities.
(2) Approve the following documents necessary to implement
the program:
(a) Resolution Designating a Districts' Treasurer and
Authorizing the Districts' Treasurer and the Orange
County Tax Collector-Treasurer to Invest and/or
Reinvest Districts' Funds;
(b) Statement of Investment Policy for Funds Controlled
by Districts' Treasurer;
-4-
March 24, 1993
(c) Reverse Repurchase Agreement Guidelines/Master
Repurchase Agreement.
(3) Authorize staff to proceed with a $50 million investment
program and to report to the Directors on investment
performance in accordance with adopted policies and
guidelines.
(4) Authorize staff to lease the Bloomberg financial reporting
system. (The estimated annual cost is within staff's
purchasing authority. The first year's costs, including
installation and other one-time costs is expected to be
$21,000.)
Director Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
C. Strategy for Fixed Floating Interest Rate Swao (1993 Swao).
The Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed a strategy for a fixed
floating interest rate swap in 1993 that could earn the Districts an
estimated $1 - 2+ million in interest annually.
Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive
Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's
recommendation that the following actions be approved:
(1) Authorize staff to proceed with preliminary 1993 SWAP
structuring for consideration by the Committee in April,
utilizing Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber on a fee
contingency basis, subject to final authorization to conduct
the transaction by the Boards.
(2) Direct staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three
firms to provide special bond counsel services for the 1993
SWAP for consideration by the Committee at the next
meeting.
-5-
March 24, 1993
(3) Authorize staff to issue purchase orders to both the Rating
Agencies, Standard and Poor's and Moody's, for review of
1993 SWAP structures in amounts not to exceed $30,000
each.
The financial team will report back to the Fiscal Policy Committee
with a proposed structure and contractual arrangements with
underwriters and bond counsel for final approval before
proceeding with any transaction.
Director Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
D. Advanced Refunding Certificates of Particioation. 1993 Series I.
The Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed a proposal for Advance
Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series I, which
would refund the remaining Series B COP's, and potentially save
the Districts approximately $2.5 million.
Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive
Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's
recommendation that the following actions be approved:
(1) Authorize staff and Merrill Lynch to proceed with
preliminary steps necessary to structure and bring to
market the Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993
Series I, once the target 3% level is achieved. Staff and
the financing team will report next month to the Fiscal
Policy on the recommended advance refunding structure
and potential savings.
(2) Direct staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three
firms to provide special bond counsel services for
Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series 1, for
consideration by the Committee at the next meeting.
-6-
March 24, 1993
The financial team will report back to the Fiscal Policy Committee
with a proposed structure and contractual arrangements with
underwriters and bond counsel for final approval before
proceeding with any transaction.
Director Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
E. Course of Construction Master Program.
The Districts' insurance broker, Robert F. Driver Company, has
recommended that the Districts consider a Course of Construction
Master Insurance Program wherein the Districts would insure all-
risk contingencies on all facilities under construction, in lieu of
requiring each individual construction contractor to provide
insurance on their individual projects. Under such a program it is
estimated that the Districts could save approximately $61,000
annually, based on a construction activity level of $100.5 million.
�./
Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive
Committee concurs with the Fiscal Policy Committee's
recommendation that the following actions be approved:
(1) Direct staff and Robert F. Driver to implement the Master
Course of Construction Program and to report to the
Committee semiannually with program results.
(2) Select Zurich Insurance Company as the insurance carrier
for the Master Course of Construction Program, at an
estimated annual premium not to exceed $125,625 in
accordance with the terms of the enclosed report, as
summarized on the following page:
-7-
March 24, 1993
PREMIUM RATE: $.125 per $100 per year
LIMITS: $45,000,000 per Occurrence
Sublimits:
Earthquake: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence
and Annual Aggregate
Flood: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence
and Annual Aggregate
Transit: $500,000
Offsite Storage: $500,000
Debris Removal: $5,000,000
Expediting Expense: $250,000
Extra Expense: $1,000,000
DEDUCTIBLES:
All Other Perils: $10,000
Flood: $50,000
Earthquake: 5% of values at risk at time of
loss subject to $100,000
minimum.
TOTAL INSURABLE VALUES: $100,500,000
v
-8-
March 24, 1993
2) Public Notification Proaram Reauired by AB 2588 - Toxics Hot Soots
Information Assessment Act, 1987.
At the October 1992 Executive Committee meeting, staff reported to the
Directors on the requirements of AB 2588 to determine toxic air
emissions from specified facilities, conduct health risk assessments and
to notify the public adjacent to the facilities of potential impacts. The
Districts' treatment plants in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach are
subject to the requirements of AB 2588.
SCAQMD has determined that a theoretical risk of contracting cancer
greater than 10 in-a-million poses a potential health risk and requires
public notification. Based on this criterion, a total of approximately 300
households located in Costa Mesa on the east side of the Santa Ana
River across from Plant 1, and in Huntington Beach on the west side of
Brookhurst across from Plant 2 may be impacted. No homes in Fountain
Valley or Newport Beach are affected. Staff briefly reviewed the
enclosed (tan) report which provides more detailed information.
Nwo, The required public notification, is in the form of an official notice
prepared by the SCAQMD and mailed by the Districts, a draft copy of
which is attached to the staff report. The Districts may also include
additional information pertaining to the matter with the SCAQMD notice
and staff has drafted a package which it proposes to send along with
SCAQMD's notice. Draft copies of the proposed Districts' letter and
information to be sent along with the official SCAQMD notice is attached
to the staff report.
In addition to the notification, staff is proposing to conduct community
meetings to which the public will be invited, after first providing
information and briefings to the Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley, Huntington
Beach and Newport Beach city staffs.
After reviewing the staff report and proposed Districts' letter and
information to be sent to the 300 households in Costa Mesa and
Huntington Beach with the SCAQMD's official notice, the Committee
directed staff to proceed with the plan outlined for compliance with the
AB 2588 requirements.
-9-
March 24, 1993
3) Biofiltration Demonstration Project.
Last November the Boards authorized staff to conduct a biofiltration
demonstration project to study the feasibility of utilizing this technology
to remove toxic, volatile organic and odorous air emissions from our
treatment plant. The purpose of the research project is to develop sound
technical and scientific information that can be utilized in arguing for
rational air quality standards that could potentially save the Districts
significant capital and operating costs, yet still be appropriate.
At the time of Board approval staff indicated that an interest in grant
funding participation in the project had been expressed by the South
Coast Air Quality Management District ($124,568) and the Water
Environment Research Federation ($30,000)• Since then Southern
California Edison Company has also expressed an interest. The project
funding allocation is as follows:
Demonstration Project Funding
November
Current 1992
Source Proposal Proposal
SCAQMD $125,000 $124,568
WERF 30,000 30,000
SCE 50,000 -0-
Sanitation Districts 75,000 125,432
Total $280,000 $280,000
Staff briefly reviewed the enclosed report (salmon) which explains the
project and its status in more detail, and recommended that the Board
action of November 18, 1992, authorizing staff to Conduct the
Biofiltration Demonstration Project, be amended to add the following:
A. Authorize the General Manager to execute a grant agreement with
the Southern California Edison Company for partial funding of the
Biofiltration Project in the amount of $50,000.
-10-
March 24, 1993
B. Authorize the General Manager to execute a specific-term-
employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering
services for up to a twelve (12) month period, at an hourly rate
for total compensation of $21.63 per hour, for a maximum
amount not to exceed $45,000.
C. Authorize the Biofiltration Demonstration to immediately proceed.
Executive Committee Recommendation: The Executive Committee
concurs with staff's recommendation to amend the previous Board
action for the Biofiltration Demonstration Project and authorize the
project to proceed.
4) Status Reoort Re Central Power Generation System Projects.
Staff provided the Committee with a verbal status report on progress
towards completion of the Central Power Generation System projects at
�./ Plants Nos. 1 and 2.
JWS:sc
Enclosures
wpd-W.A...MW32493..
-11-
r RESOLUTION NO. 93-
DESIGNATING A DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND AUTHORIZING THE
DISTRICTS'TREASURER AND THE ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER/TAX
COLLECTOR TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS AND
REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 73-18
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE
COUNTY,CALIFORNIA,DESIGNATING A DISTRICTS'TREASURER AND
AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND THE COUNTY OF
ORANGE TREASURER/TAX COLLECTOR TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST
DISTRICTS' FUNDS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 73-18
rrrrrrrrrrrr
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and
14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That is hereby appointed as Treasurer of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California.
Section 2: The authority of the Boards of Directors to invest or reinvest
Districts' surplus funds or to sell or exchange securities so purchased or to deposit for
safekeeping the funds and investments of the Districts with depositories as provided for in
California Government Code Sections 53608 and 53630, is hereby delegated to the Districts'
Treasurer, as authorized by California Government Code Section 53607.
Section : The Districts' Treasurer is authorized to direct that the Districts'
surplus funds or any portion thereof be deposited into the care, custody and control of the
Treasurer/Tax Collector of the County of Orange for purposes of investment or reinvestment,
pursuant to California Government Code Section 53684.
1
Section 4: That the Treasurer/Tax Collector of the County of Orange (County
Treasurer) be and is hereby authorized and directed to invest or to reinvest all funds belonging 'fir
to the Districts, which have been transferred to the County Treasurer, in those instruments as
authorized by California Government Code Section 53601 and/or in deposits with depositories,
as authorized by California Government Code Section 53635. The County Treasurer is further
authorized and directed to sell or exchange securities so purchased and to terminate or renew
deposits so made. Each of these authorizations is to continue until the further order of the
Boards of Directors of the Districts or the Districts' Treasurer.
Section 5: - That these investments, deposits, sales of investments, termination
or renewal of deposits, are to be made by the Districts' Treasurer and Treasurer/Tax Collector
of the County of Orange only after consultation with and direction by the General Manager of
the Districts or his designee.
Section 6: That the Districts' Treasurer and Treasurer/Tax Collector of the ,
County of Orange, upon confirmation by the General Manager of the Districts, are hereby
authorized and directed to prepare such records of account as are necessary to effect the transfer
of funds required to make the indicated investments.
Section 7: In the event of the temporary absence of the Districts' Treasurer,
the Districts' General Manager is hereby delegated the authority to appoint an Acting Treasurer
to carry out the powers and duties of the office of the Districts' Treasurer.
Section 8: Resolution No. 73-18 is hereby repealed.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held , 1993
nw:pj(Baq
2 `�
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
March 17, 1993
tOBGG ELLIS AVENUE
P.O..BOX 6127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.MIAORN1A 2272118127
71AI SS2 2an
REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: March 17, 1993
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Charles E. Puckett , Chairman William Mahoney, Joint Chairman
James V. Evans Elks Chenevey, Merrill Lynch
Don Griffin Mike Stamenson, Merrill Lynch
John Gullixson Ed Long, Mudge Rose
Iry Pickier Ted Davidson, Robert F. Driver
James Wahner John Coan, Paine Webber
Grace Winchell Tom Woodruff, General Counsel
Evelyn Hart
Peer Swan STAFF PRESENT
ABSENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
None. Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering
Gary Hasenstab, Director of Personnel
Robert J. Ooten, Assistant Director of
Operations
Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager
1 . 1990-92 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND INTEREST RATE
MONITORING.
The financing team continues to monitor the interest cost and investment earnings
of the 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program, Series A, B, and C Certificates of
Participation (COP) issues and to provide periodic reports to the Directors. Staff
reviewed the enclosed report (pink) which provides the details for the following
summary:
Total Net True
COP Interest Interest Interest Interest
ISSUE Paid Earned (Cost) Earninas (Cost) Earninas
SERIES A $ 6,882,170 $10,646,049 $3,763,879 . 1.6949%
SERIES B 14,650,096 13,919,512 (730,584) ( 0.3563%)
SERIES 1,153.189 1 ,606.733 453,544 4,0426%
yam/ COMBINED $22.685.455 $26,172,294 $3.486.839 1.6636°h
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee '
Page 2
March 17, 1993
2. ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION 1992 SERIES -
SPECIAL COUNSEL FEES.
Last year, the Boards selected a financing team for the Districts' recent Refunding
Certificates of Participation 1992 Series, consisting of PaineWebber as underwriter
and remarketing agent; Mudge Rose and Rourke & Woodruff as co-special counsel;
and Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe as underwriter's counsel.
The arrangement with Mudge Rose to provide co-bond counsel services required in
connection with the advance refunding was in accordance with the terms and
conditions of a letter agreement dated June 18, 1992 (copy enclosed). The letter
agreement set forth fees for services based on per diem rates, for an amount not
to exceed $110,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses.
During November, as the transaction was nearing closure, staff was given an oral
indication that Mudge Rose was incurring greater than anticipated staff costs due
to the complexity of the advance refunding structure and necessary legal
documentation and review. The transaction closed December 3, 1992.
In two letters (copies enclosed), Mudge has reported that the transaction required
a much greater effort than they had anticipated, totaling $280,000. Mr. Ed Long
of Mudge Rose attended the meeting and reviewed the reasons for the overrun as
explained in his January 7th letter. As stated in their March 11 th letter, Mudge
Rose proposed to reduce the total fee for services to $180,000, plus expenses,
and they would absorb the balance of $100,000 in an effort to resolve this.
The Fiscal Policy Committee deliberated the request of Mudge Rose at considerable
length and recommends that the Boards respectfully deny his request for a fee
increase, and that payment be made in the amount of the original contract fee of
$110,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses.
(Note: The legal fees authorized to be paid to Rourke, Woodruff & Spradlin for the
special bond counsel services related to this transaction totaled $15,000. The
actual amount paid was $2,788. There is no request for any adjustment or
increase in that amount.)
3. INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT POLICY AND REVERSE REPURCHASE
AGREEMENTS.
At the January 27,1993 Executive Committee meeting, Director Swan asked for a
review of the Districts' investment policy, now administered solely by the County
Treasurer, to determine the desirability of providing staff the flexibility of managing
a portion of the Districts' reserve fund investment portfolio.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 3
March 17, 1993
In response to the direction from the Executive Committee, staff and
representatives of Merrill Lynch, the Districts' underwriter, reviewed an Investment
Management Policy and Reverse Repurchase Agreements Report with the Fiscal
Policy Committee in February. In summary, staff and the financial consultant
reported that:
- Such a program would not be unique and, in fact, is practiced by many
agencies in California.
- Based on the market history for the past five years, the Districts could expect
to realize substantial annual investment earnings from such a program.
- The risks associated with such a program are no greater than risks associated
with the Districts' existing debt financing and related transactions.
- This is a policy decision of the Boards, and if the Directors deem it appropriate
to implement such a program, it would be necessary to revise the Boards'
existing resolutions, adopt a new investment management policy and
guidelines, name a Districts' Treasurer, and make a distinction between that
position and the County Treasurer, and open a separate investment account
with a bank or other financial institution.
It was the consensus of the Fiscal Policy Committee members that implementation
of such a program would be worthwhile, and the Committee directed staff, General
Counsel and the financial consultant to draft the necessary implementation
documents for consideration by the Committee at its March meeting. However,
because this would be a significant change to current policy and practice, the
Committee also requested that the matter be agendized for a joint meeting with the
Executive Committee on February 24th for review and any further direction prior to
proceeding.
At the February 24, 1993 joint Fiscal and Executive Committee meeting, Districts'
staff and representatives of Merrill Lynch gave an oral presentation and answered
specific questions. In addition to the information and documents requested by the
Fiscal Policy Committee, it was suggested that the Districts' independent
accounting firm review the proposal, and that a sample earnings report for the
previous 18 months be prepared assuming such a practice had been in place.
Staff reported that they had met with the Districts' auditing firm, and discussed
the following draft documents with the Orange County Treasurer which were
reviewed by the Committee and are enclosed herewith:
�✓ A. Resolution Designating a Districts' Treasurer and Authorizing the Districts'
Treasurer and the Orange County Tax Collector-Treasurer to Invest and/or
Reinvest Districts' Funds (tan);
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 4
March 17, 1993
B. Statement of Investment Policy for Funds Controlled by Districts' Treasurer
(yellow);
C. Reverse Repurchase Agreement Guidelines/Master Repurchase Agreement
(green);
D. Sample 18-month Program Earnings Report (pink);
E. Districts' Auditor, KPMG, Letter Addressing Accounting Requirements
(salmon).
The Committee also discussed questions raised by former Joint Chairman
A. B. Buck Catlin about changing the Districts' investment policy. His
memorandum and the additional information supplied by staff in response to his
questions are also enclosed (blue).
Staff also reported that the matter had been discussed at great length with the
Orange County Treasurer, who indicates support for the reverse repurchase
program which is the same practice he utilizes and is largely responsible for his _.
ability to realize such an excellent record of investment returns for funds deposited l '
in the County's commingled investment pool. Since implementation of such a �..✓
program contemplates the naming of both a Districts' Treasurer as well as
utilization of the County Treasurer's services, Mr. Citron has requested that County
counsel clarify whether or not that would impact the duties that the County
Treasurer provides on behalf of the Districts.
The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends that a revised investment policy/reverse
repurchase policy be implemented by the following actions, subject to satisfactory
resolution of any questions by the Orange County Treasurer pertaining to banking
services provided by his office on behalf of the Districts:
A. Appoint Merrill Lynch, the Districts' underwriter who also works closely with
the County Treasurer's investment program, to serve as the primary dealer of
Districts' choice. Merrill Lynch would charge no remuneration on
investments, since a spread is already included in the price of the securities.
B. Approve the following documents necessary to implement the program:
(1) Resolution Designating a Districts' Treasurer and Authorizing the
Districts' Treasurer and the Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector to
Invest and/or Reinvest Districts' Funds;
(2) Statement of Investment Policy for Funds Controlled by Districts'
Treasurer;
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 5
March 17, 1993
(3) Reverse Repurchase Agreement Guidelines/Master Repurchase
Agreement.
C. Authorize staff to proceed with a $50 million investment program and to
report to the Directors on investment performance in accordance with adopted
policies and guidelines.
D. Authorize staff to lease the Bloomberg financial reporting system. (The
estimated annual cost is within staff's purchasing authority. The first year's
costs, including installation and other one-time costs is expected to be
$21 ,000.)
4. STRATEGY FOR FIXED TO FLOATING INTEREST RATE SWAP 0 993 SWAP).
At the January 20, 1993 Fiscal Policy Committee Meeting, staff presented the
1992 Annual Finance Program Report. The Report included a preliminary 1993
program calendar indicating staff and financing team would be returning to the
Committee with a proposed strategy for managing a Fixed to Floating-Interest Rate
SWAP Program.
Both Merrill Lynch and PaineWebber have been working closely with staff on
�✓ potential SWAP structures, and both have agreed upon the proposed fixed to
floating rate strategy. Estimated earnings under the structures being considered
may range from $1-2+ million annually. Both firms have also agreed to proceed
with the structuring and with rating agency discussions on a contingency basis,
i.e., no fees will be paid unless a SWAP is initiated.
The enclosed bound report detailing the proposed SWAP strategy, prepared by
staff, Merrill Lynch, and PaineWebber was reviewed by staff for the Committee.
The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the following actions:
A. Authorize staff to proceed with preliminary 1993 SWAP structuring for
consideration by the Committee in April, utilizing Merrill Lynch and
PaineWebber on a fee contingency basis, subject to final authorization to
conduct the transaction by the Boards.
B. Direct staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide for
special bond counsel services for the 1993 SWAP consideration by the
Committee at the next meeting.
C. Authorize staff to issue purchase orders to both the Rating Agencies,
Standard and Poor's and Moody's, for review of 1993 SWAP structures in
�� amounts not to exceed $30,000 each.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 6
March 17, 1993
The financial team will report back to the Fiscal Policy Committee with a
proposed structure and contractual arrangements with underwriters and bond
counsel for final approval before proceeding with any transaction.
5. ADVANCE REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION. 1993 SERIES I.
Staff reported that they and Merrill Lynch have been monitoring recently declining
municipal interest rates to determine if it would be advantageous to refund the
remaining Series B COPs. The market continues to respond to President Clinton's
economic plan and fundamental market and technical forces.
The Committee reviewed the enclosed bound report which identifies current
potential Series B refunding savings from traditional, inverse floater and synthetic
fixed rate advance refunding structures. The report identifies a target 3% level of
savings under the most cost-effective structure, for a minimum total savings of
approximately $2.5 million. -
Staff is also concurrently pursuing the possible refunding of either the Series B
2007 or 2016 term bonds under the State Water Resources Control Board
(SWRCB) Revolving Fund (SRF loan program). Staff is pursuing with the SWRCB
the potential of refunding either term bond using the Interplant Pipeline Project, Job
No. 1-9. If the Districts are able to obtain certain SRF program waivers, be
approved for refinancing, and have the project placed on the State Water
Resources Control Board project priority listing for the IFFY 94, then the Districts
could receive a loan with a fixed interest rate of potentially less than 2%. Such
loans for refinancing purposes are limited by SRF policy to approximately $20
million. If this SRF option is made available, one of these Series B term bonds
could be excluded from this action.
Merrill Lynch, the Districts' underwriter for the three 1990-92 Series COP issues,
has agreed to proceed with structuring the transaction on a contingency basis.
Should an advance refunding be completed, Merrill Lynch will be compensated
through the underwriter's spread.
The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the following actions:
A. Authorize staff and the Merrill Lynch to proceed with preliminary steps
necessary to structure and bring to market the Refunding Certificates of
Participation, 1993 Series I, once the target 3% level is achieved. Staff and
the Financing Team will report next month to the Fiscal Policy on the
recommended advance refunding structure and potential savings.
B. Direct staff and General Counsel to submit a list of three firms to provide
special bond counsel for Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1993 Series I,
for consideration by the Committee at the next meeting.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 7
March 17, 1993
The financial team will report back to the Fiscal Policy Committee with a
proposed structure and contractual arrangements with underwriters and bond
counsel for final approval before proceeding with any transaction.
6. COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION MASTER PROGRAM.
At the November 1992 Fiscal Policy Committee meeting, Districts' staff and
insurance broker, Robert F. Driver Co., presented a new program concept pertaining
to insuring construction projects for consideration by the Fiscal Policy Committee.
The proposed course of construction master insurance program was reviewed by
the Districts' Risk Management Task Force and submitted to the Fiscal Policy
Committee for review and approval. A course of construction policy provides
normal "all-risk" property insurance on all facilities under construction until
completion and acceptance, in place of the coverage currently required of
construction contractors on an individual project basis.
The November report recommended that the Districts take control of course of
construction policy coverage on upcoming new construction projects and identified
two implementation options. It will enable the Districts to control coverage,
achieve consistency of coverage and realize insurance cost savings on construction
�...� contracts.
The Fiscal Policy Committee directed Robert F. Driver to solicit proposals for course
of construction coverage, and to require the contractor to be responsible for a
reasonable deductible for each loss. The Committee recommended that the
program be implemented for at least one year with staff reporting semiannually on
program results.
The enclosed bound report which presents the results of the Master Course of
Construction marketing including coverage, terms and premium comparison for all
proposals and the Summary of Contractors' Insurance Bids for P2-42-2 (white)
were reviewed for the Committee by staff and Robert F. Driver.
The Fiscal Policy Committee recommends the following actions:
A. Direct staff and Robert F. Driver to implement the Master Course of
Construction Program and to report to the Committee semiannually with
program results.
B. Select Zurich Insurance Company as the insurance carrier for the Master
Course of Construction Program for a premium rate of $.125 per year per
$100 of construction project bid, an estimated annual premium not to exceed
`� $125,625, in accordance with the terms of the enclosed report.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 8
March 17, 1993
7. SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL PLAN REPORT.
During a recent review of the Self-Funded Health Plan budget and costs, the
Committee asked staff for additional information. The Directors expressed concern
over the rate of expenditures compared to the budget and what cost containment
practices were in effect.
The Committee and staff reviewed the enclosed (gray) staff report, which presents
an overview of the plan and cost containment measures in effect.
JWS:lc
REF.RFK3.17
Enclosures
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
41 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10844 EILBAVENUE
P.O.BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272B41127
March 10, 1993 014)962-2411
STAFF REPORT
1990-1992 Capital Improvement Program Certificates
of Particiostion Monitoring
The Districts' financing team continues to monitor the interest cost and investment
interest earnings of the 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program COP issues. The
enclosed schedules show the net interest earnings to date of the Series A and C
variable rate COP issues, and the reduced interest cost of the Series B fixed rate COP
issue.
SERIES A. B AND C NET INTEREST COST SUMMARY
The Estimated Series A Net Debt Service to Date schedule (blue) indicates that while
the variable daily interest rate paid by the Districts since December 1990 has ranged
from 1 .00% to 9.75%, the average has been 3.088%. Overall interest earnings on
the Series A proceeds, including the reimbursement amount for 1989-90
L improvements on deposit with the Orange County Treasurer, continue to exceed
interest costs, resulting in a net positive cash flow.
The Estimated Series B Net Debt Service to Date schedule (gold) displays the net
interest cost of the fixed rate issue. There are three types of investment earnings on
this transaction: Interest earned on unspent proceeds deposited with the Trustee or
the County, interest earnings on the ten-year Guaranteed Investment Contract (GIC)
for the debt service reserve fund, and net SWAP earnings. The total SWAP reversal
earnings have been shown as a single deposit on November 5, 1992 and, therefore,
depict an elevated one-time earnings for Series B.
The Estimated Series C Net Debt Service to Date Schedule (white) indicates that the
average variable daily interest rate paid by the Districts since September 1, 1992, has
been 2.342%. Overall interest earnings on Series C proceeds, including the
reimbursement amount on deposit with the Orange County Treasurer, as well as
earnings on proceeds invested by the Franklin and Fidelity funds, exceed interest
costs, resulting in a net positive cash flow.
1990-92 COP Monitoring '
Page 2
March 10, 1993
`/
The pertinent interest cost, investment earnings and resulting all-in true interest cost
(TIC) figures for each issue and for all issues combined through March 8, 1993 are
summarized below:
COP Total Net True
Interest Interest Interest Interest
Paid Earned (Cost) Earnings (Cost) Earninas
SERIES A $ 6,882,170 $10,646,049 $3,763,879 1.6949%
SERIES B 14,650,096 13,919,512 (730,584) (0.3563%)
SERIES 1,153,189 1,606.733 453.544 4.0426%
COMBINED $22.685,455 $26,172,294 $3 486 83 1.66360&
PG:Ic
RERCAS3 PC3.17
V
h1F.RR0.1.L1� CO. 6IM91 � \ -.
cowry swwiw Dic0im a o�c%e6T
C"-W wl aFenidwiw
lag Se,-A lPecpvn
199O925ecwA
FS M)SK AN DMTSM"CETODATO
A B c D K F O B 1 I K L M
Li1nN Co}4 k1YfWeLnl Fiednu
Feimwowwemy I F,oae.31eea.dMTlutlee 91o:ee.a.mea.Bllcol.6y
TaW d%
fRinciMl field PerieAv UWnl T9 AR Fedcdic Mit w,ccwmt AM FMadic 61Eu (I16Cow Aw
Ouuwdin6 Yield Deb 9erviee WTlupw Yield Faniliy Aml.r/Cowry Yield F F ilp MFimicyc 11C
I --
I19590-MINI fIW.OWAW 3.155% NN.9W.W NATBOW m TJW% M68,335.W 319,880.MW /600): fW9.81033 60ZM 21 fb9.IW.3l (IA13325%)
OININI-ONIN1 IWWO.WO ).155% 3619W.W I 3O0M.W0.W 6930% 191.53/N <9.880.00000 8.89055 W�27.0 601W631 339,IW 14 (3.15MM )
ON)1N1-ON/91 IWOW.OW 3.616% 3M.W/.N I1O33.O D0d 636 116.241% <9,880.000.00 BBMS ]68,69 W SA.9N33 ISAW S (AIS )
O,01L91-ONI91 IWWOWO 3.71mIWN )W.55933 I 33,ON000OO 631M 11633156 <9,8W.M.00 961m 3N,10000 SWI5156 14O66119 (1.74 d
06Oimi-O 1,501 10000O.W0 3.16M 3W.538.3I 110%.omw 610M 66JT1.91 e9.880.000A0 1.61M 353.BA.W 535JW.N 15130119 (I.1T71%)
OIN191-ONI91 IWWOWO 3.619% WL6166T 1 1.001AWOO S.W93% A,1/1.9I NAWWOW ISSM 331=33 3XII3.N 9I.61T95 (O M5T1%)
O A)INI-0N3091 IWOWW0 1%9i MOAI66T I 1.01T,WOm 5.9 WA IA/51.N 39,3WOWW 6310% N1J6133 156.113.33 35.696/5 (0.mm)
WNINI-W91N1 IWW9W0 3.366% 39T,ITS.W 1 OW WA OW 59,BWWO.W 611M 337.100 IITJ31l) SO.N6M (0.59055M)
040191-ONI91 IW,OWOW 3AA% 3N./d66T 1 O.W WA am
39.8WOWW 8.lM 3A,IWT 11T,105.33 113W.W (0158810%)
09A191-IW.KWI IWWOWO 3.BM% SOSAI6ID 1 0.W WA 0.W N.380,WO.W IAM 333,03.11 3515M.D (539IIJ)) O&31TM
1PV191-1l' l IWWO.W0 3.92MISM 331.N1.W 1 OW WA am
e9,880,000W B.IW% )1T9lTW 333.91T.W 10.M163 losol M)
1191N1-INd91 IWOWOW 3.560% 3 1?R.31 1 000 WA OW 59.8W.OWW I.IW% 33T91T.W 333,9AW (7.016) (O()MOm)
I3N191-INI91 IWOWWO AI33% IKTN.1) OW WA OW e9,880,000W 9.IIM 3KSMW 3IT.SM.6T (T.116O O09W36%
01N193-019193 IW.0W.0W 1069% 131313.M 1 O.W WA O.W 59.880.OW.W 9.3W% 3WIM33 )KIN..W )11,135.% 2QW16%i)
WNN3-O"Im IWOWWO 1.9/M IM,M.A I OW WA OW 59,/80.WO.W 9190% 1M,IN.13 N6.INJ3 13031198 2vmloii
O3XI192-ON193 IWW0600 1M6% Ad,M3.M I OW WA O.W 59.880.0W.W 93C0% 39)SXW WIMP IN.3M58 (IAT915%)
MIM-O IM IM000,OW ).66M WSJSS.N 1 am
WA 0W 59.990.OWW 9.15m 186330.W )8(13WW 15,0M65 0).9M03M)
OSO193-ON193 IWWOOW 1.1/M 1MJII5/ 1 OW WA OW 59.880. W.W 9150% 3WJ)1W MO3IS.W 115,OI1.33 (1.A W
06UIM-O alm lmooli UOO 1.86M 15"58.33 I O.W WA O.W 39.890.0W.W 90M: 3AAW.6) 3rWV 331,531.)) 2d9355M)
W9193-W919I IWW9W0 IA10% IW,80651 1 0.W WA OW 59,880,W9W 905(N 375.MW 33611/J) ASJ31M 2U131m)
O lm-ON193 IWWaW0 119M IM,IM.93 OW WA am
59,88QOW.W 9.0M5 37015.67 331A1M 191563.A 2NI119%)
O➢N193-09/ im IWWQWO 3880% 35OW0.W O.W WA OW 59889WO.W 9.010% AIJI5.63 3N.515.6T 1NJI)6T (1615513%)
10N193-1O'I193 1W.Wa O 1310% 174.1WO am
WA OW 39.e8O000.W /880% 3T1.111W M.dWW 1WA9.33 (11M)"d
11N193-TWIM IWWO.OW 10➢M M0133 O.W WA O.W 59,88O.W6W 6M0% W"1.33 N➢WI33 IN,953.W 2)T03T6%)
1N0193-01 5193 IWWO.WO 3,IN% 3W,M133 O.W WA OW 59.8W.WOW LIM{ 3W.591.I3 339.M,67 111011W (I.38931W8)
01919)-ONNI IWOW.OW IAA% 116.SM.N I am
WA O.W 39.880.WOW I.IM3 331.351T 339.35167 IM,01633 231S13M)
039193-ON49J IW.WO,OW NSM 194CM.M I O.W WA OW 59,MO,WOW 8.150% 3IIJ326/ )N.J326T 153J6911 (1.139109A)
I
I
I
IWM 16M1169.M I 655M A24,7I615 1. M B.AIJN.K 81016049.14 M,36187938 (169951%)
MERRILL L NCN&CO. 03/0893
117,555,000 n
County Sanitation Districts ofOmngc County
CON-Capi W Improvcmcnt Program
1990-92 Series B
ESTIMATED SERIES B NET DEBT SERVICE TO DATE
A B C D E F O H I 3
Interest Cost Investment Earnings
Principal OUL+tanding Proceeds Invested with Tmstx Proceeds Invnted with County
I
Principal Fixed Periodic Debt Unspent Proceeds Avg. Periodic Reimbursement Avg. Periodic
Outstanding Retc Smice w/Trust" Yield Esmings Amt.w/County Yield Earnings
I
05/07/91 - O"IMI EI 17 55,000 6.860% 537 IS20 5 b I E90,185,195.00 5.892e/. 363,952.86 E12368,000.00 8.540% 72341.33
0610191 - 0613091 117,555,000 6,860% 672,022.75 I 90,185,195.00 5.910% 438,077.67 12368,000.00 8.210% 83,459.59
07/0I91 - 07/3191 117,555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 98,427,937.00 5.910% 443,859.79 12,36SX0,00 S.120% 85,293.15
09/0191 - 0E/319I 117,555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 83,655277.00 5.780% 410,667.19 123689M.00 8.110% 85,190.11
09/0191 - 095091 117,555,000 6.960% 672,022.75 76,674,244.00 5.620% 354,171.99 12,369,000.00 8AW1.. 86,20327
IOro191 - 10/31/91 117,55SAW 6.860% 672,022.75 I 70.614y19.00 5382% 322,778.70 12,368,000.00 8.130-A 85,400.19
IIA0191 - 115091 117,555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 65,953.754.00 5.005% 270,902.50 12368,000.00 8.130'R 92,645.35
12/0191 - 1213191 117,555,000 6.960% 672,02,235 I 55,611AM.00 4.793% 226392.72 12368,000.00 8.110% 85,190.11
OIN192 - 01/3192 117,555AW 6.860% 672=.75 I 53AS0375.00 4.793% 215,955.72 12368,000.00 9300Y. 97,690.26
02/0192 - 02r2992 117,555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 46AS3,795.00 4.264% ISSR55.39 12368,000.00 9190$A 91}89.39
0310192 - 03/3192 117,555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 37.880240.00 4.223% t35,863A5 12368,000.00 9A60% 99370.95
04/0192 - 04/30/92 117,555,000 6.960% 672,022.75 I 33.696,598.00 4.08gY. 113,220.54 12368,000.00 9.300% 94538.96
05/0192 - 05/3192 117555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 27,472,263.00 3.968% 92583.78 1230,000.00 9.150% 96,114.61
06/0192 - 06/3092 117,355,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 9,071,269.00 3.894% 28,95SA7 12368,000.00 9.070% 92,200.90
07/0192 - 07/3I92 117555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 7,129,713.00 3.530% 21372.47 12368,00000 9.050% 95,064.19
08/0192 - O&131192 117,555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 5,692346.00 3A22% 16,543.99 12368,000.00 9.040% 94959.13
0910192 - 09/3092 117555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 4,827,958.00 3.162% 12,547.40 12368,000.00 9.010% 91,590.97
10/0192 - 10/31/92 117,555,000 6.860Y. 672,022.75 I 4,479,415.00 3.170% 12,060.06 12368,OU0.00 8.940% 93,908.70
1110192 - 118092 117555,000 6.860Y. 672,022.75 I 3,924552.00 3.022% 9,74923 12368,000.00 SAWK 90369A6
12/0192 - 1213192 117555,000 6.860% 672,022.75 I 1,713375,00 3.153% 4588.42 1236SAW.00 SA20% $8,446.45
01/0193 - OI/3193 117,555,000 6160% 672,022.75 I 1586,651.44 3.119% 4,201.45 1236SAM.00 8.170% 85,920.37
0210193 - 022893 117,555,000 6.8wA 672,022.75 I 1369,446.05 3.048% 3,201.78 12368,000.00 8.140% 77,230.54
I
I
E14,650,095.95 I 4.324% f3,659,695.56 8.684% E1,954,221.94
WRRILL LM sCO. 03N893
117,555,ON o
Courtly Sniblim Din ofg pCw ly
CON-Capital Imp9wallmd Pw
1990.925cnwB
ESTIMATED SERIES B NET DEBT SERVICE TO DATE-Pap 2
K L M N O P Q R S T
Inrmmwl Emn'nw
GIC Emllinp Swap Emllinp
TMI Nd
1.wl Avg R.Fm Flalny Find Nc1 R.1 InwY (Il6 COMP NI-U
Fml6 Yrcld In GIC la Paid OB. d Em N rfl Emninp IIO Emninp TIC
05I)7/B- 03ON91 $9.513,625.0 8.010% 51919.54 U89,216J2 (568.401.68) 0.51932%
(WI)IN1- 06 "I 9,513,625.00 8.010% 63,503.45 8610,3"..61 (N10,5T9.61) 174.4 0.10 (69'L56165) 5.33155%
OTNIMI- OTGI91 9913,625.N 8.010% 65,6M.0 356."LM (3%Q591.20) D8,183.9T (/33,838.18) 4.65413%
OMIN1- 08G191 9,513,625.00 8.010% 65,6M.23 601."9.72 (60LN8.72) IN,028.81 (511,993.N) 5.69339%
MMIAH - 09G091 9,513,625.00 8.010% 63,303.45 QZ916.23 (63;916.n) T0,%145 (NI,ON.30) 6.6d902%
MINI - 10A191 9,513,625.00 Ilkim 65,620.0 6U,9U.96 (60,913.99) M,6113.16 (N;139.61) 6.18"M
I INIBI - Ila"] 9,513,625.N 8.010% 63,503.45 M(W1.59 3,IN,NB.N ;T15.W01 3,132,O55M ;6N,03155 (M.3%70%)
Mimi - IMIM 9,513,625.111) 8.010% 65,6211.23 372-M33 (372,279.33) 4.913.73 (66T,109.02) 7.15769%
OINIB2- OV3192 9,513.625. 0 8.010% 65.6"M 619,151.N (119.151.N) (39,88613) (711,90T.58) 7.63935%
OWDIM- 021M92 9,513,625.N 8.010% 61,386.67 256J5266 (234.352,M) 56a78.T9 (615,N3.%) 6.60S50%
03N193- 035IM 9,313,625.N 8.010% 65,6M.M 2M.M.18 (2 ,STT.Iq 74,2TIA5 (597,745.30) 6A1365%
NN192- OUM 9,513,625.N 8410% 63.M3.45 293,TM.T9 (M5,726.79) (24d6J.85) (696,486.N) 7.67289%
MIM- 0551N2 9,513,625.N 8.010% 65,620.0 331.333.61 3,109,N8.60 2,TTT,71199 3,N2,031.61 2,3051),N8.86 (25.32130%)
MIM- 003M 9,513,623.00 SBIM 63,M3.I5 322,677.09 (3216T3.09) (138,016.27) (810,037.N) 8.69122%
0761192- MIM 9,513,625.111) BDI636 65,6".13 D2.35137 (232.352-37) (50,293.30) (722,318.23) 7.7M5%
OS0192- OBO192 9,513,625.N 8.010% 65.6M.13 203,IN.10 (20.109.10) (25,NS.73) (6N,N8.30) 7.68922%
O9NIM- MM 9,513,625.N 8.010% 63,503.45 234.998.50 (236,888.50) (67,29.68) (739,269A3) 7.010%
IMIM- I"Im 9,513,625.00 9.010% 65,6".M 284.634.33 (2U.636.33) (I D.U5.34) (mftilo9) BAU32%
11N192- 11/3092 9,513,625.N 8.010% 63,503.45 M.393.03 3,039.979.18 2,U5,585.15 31661N9.N 6,66;056.29 S,TN,033.54 (6112365%)
IMIM- IMIM 9,513,625.00 8.010% 65,6M.0 IS8,655.10 (513X7.65) S.SN13%
OINIAa- OWIN3 9,513,623.00 8.010% 124,8N.11 214,911.93 (437.110.84 6.90453%
02AIIN3- Nf18lU 9,513,625.00 8.010% BO,43131 (591,5NA6) 6.36762%
8.010% S1,405,562.% 35.M.013.38 $9.252.115.38 S3.437,101N U,66;N9.N S13919,511.16 (3730,58,1.69) 03563015%
MERRISYNCH&CO. 0NOW3
9s.saoaoo
Conoty SeniMion Districts ofO.%.County
COPS—Capital Improvemad Program
1990-92 Series C
ESTIMATED SERIES C NE f DEBT SERVICE TO DATE
A B C D E F O H 1 3
Intmest Coate Investment Eaminae
Pmieipd Oatatmding Pmceeds Inverted with Franklin Proceeds Invested with Fidelity
Pai.ipd Avg. Periodic Debt I Unspent Proceed. Avg. Periodic Umper8 Proceeds Avg. Periodic
Outstanding Yield Service w/Tmstee Yield Earnings w/Tm.t. Yield Eemings
I
I
09Po192-09/3092 598,500,000 2.883% 5236,673.61 I E38,440,590.70 5.500% E173.772.53 E35,361,487.19 3.162% E91,945.07
10101/92-10/3192 98.500,000 2.410% 197,794.32 I 35,440,590.70 -2.730% (39,129.51) 32,875,072.11 3.170'.b 89,499.70
11/0192-11/3092 98,500,000 2.090% 171,554.17 37,284,233.36 2.300vh 70,492.52 29.724.927.62 3.022% 73.831.93
1210192-12/3192 98,500,000 2A34% 199,790.93 I 37,284,233.36 3.600% 110,320A7 23,227,145.05 3.153% 60,193.31
0110193-0113193 98,500,000 1.979% 154aM.58 I 37,284,233.36 4.530% 148,074.59 20,650,797.91 3.118% 56.447.29
0210193-02128/93 98,500,000 2.353% 193,142.08 I 37,294,233.36 6.290% 179,904.09 18,299,418.74 3.049% 42.794.21
I
2.342% SI,I53,169.60 I 3.248% E593,424.69 7.112% 5413,701.39
MERRIL(-.4CH k CO. 0341893
598,500,000 n
County Sanitatim Districts ofOsmge County
COPS—Capita Imptovement Pmpnm
1990-92 Series C
ESTIMATED SERIES C NET DEBT SERVICE TO DATE—PAGE 2
K L M N O P Q R S
Inmeenno tFeminm
Proceeds Invested with County Reserve Fund Eamings
Told Net
Reimbursement Avg. Periodic Invested Avg. Reserve Food Inveement (Int CostY All-In
Aunt w/County Yield Eamings Funds Yield Fidelity Esmings hot Eamiop TIC
09d1192—MO92 SIO,499,745.65 9.010% $77.755.63 $9.950,000.00 3.162% $25,396.97 5369,070.22 $132,396,61 (7.08069%)
10/0192-10131192 10,499,745.65 8.940% 79,72317 9,950,000.00 3.170% 26,316.20 105,609.66 (92,184.66) 4.93012%
11/0192-113092 10,499,745.65 8.880% 76,633.76 9,850,000.00 3.022% 24,465.79 245.413.90 73,859.73 (3.95008%)
129192-123192 10,499,745.65 9.420% 72,663.99 9,930,000.OD 3.133% 25,526.34 268,704.11 69,91328 (3.68534%)
01101193-013193 10,499,745.65 8.170% 75.206.95 9,850,000.00 3.119% 26,924.18 306.652.99 152,41&41 (8.15147%)
0210193-02/2893 10,499,745.65 9.140% 65.364.44 9,950,000.00 3.048% 23,029.39 311,292.13 118,140.04 (6.31823%)
8.593% 5447,548.06 3.125% $152,058.86 111,606,733.01 5453,543.41 (4.04265%)
MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER S FEROON
1..N.m[ry urv[ 21 eT FLOOR s einev:x.w.
vew I......w ronx lome-a.e wAaxlxOrorv.o.c.z0.., lee.
z 1ae to,... 333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE ........ease
`� ea0 nr vzNO[ LOS ANG E LES, CALI FORN IA 90071-1525 e0n[voo.xonwsuoa[c[xrRs
awr[l..0 213-613-1 11 2 su.o.T.rumen only[
..w ronx,N.1. .01 n.1..[.C..IL.avoroa+
[Ia-v[-1e00 +o Pee0.8100
.ca1x u:
NO....coano..rz AD L. ,0 12.zu-.vo-use 00., o[u.AIx
ax[wnw no«o Ro.o eioo.o ,soo[.R.R1s.rRAxc[
RAne1RR.«r,«[w�uea o,oe+ 1o>a u1 z.e1.m. .1
ao1-ease..+
ro RArvoRON3-«on1[uu01«a
e-1 ronwo«o«a-cxoN[.xw.m-xu
EOWARO W. LONG TOKYO 109..MAN
epRT... mal
WRIT[R'0 oI.Ml....[.
(213)229-2301
(Voicemail)
January 7, 1993
Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca
Financial Manager
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Dear Ms. Gorczyca:
District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 recently closed a
very successful refunding transaction, the $160, 600, 000 Refunding
Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series (the "Refunding
COPS") . The Refunding COPS produced for the Districts savings in
excess of $7,700,000.
Mudge Rose served as co-bond counsel in the Refunding
COPS financing. In that regard, I provide herewith a copy of our
services contract, dated June 18, 1992 (the "Services Contract") .
Rourke & Woodruff also served as co-bond counsel.
The Refunding COPS financing was a ''synthetic fixed"
structure and, accordingly, the Services Contract provided for
payment of Mudge Rose time charges up to $110,000.
Substantial work on the financing began at the end of
June; the financing closed on December 3, 1992. Work to complete
the file continued through December. Accordingly, services were
rendered for six months in bringing the financing to completion.
Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca
January 7, 1993
Page 2
During this six month period, Mudge Rose rendered
services to the Districts which resulted in $261,770 of time
charges. Attached hereto are graphic depictions of the accrual
of the services charges over the six-month period, both on a
month-by-month and cumulative basis.
We have not yet billed the Districts for the services
rendered. We are writing to you at this time to seek the
necessary authorization from the Districts' staff, Fiscal Policy
Committee and Boards to bill all or substantially all of our time
charges.
We do not make this request lightly, but we believe we
are justified in doing so. In this regard, we point out the
following for your consideration:
Unanticipated Changes in Circumstances
When the Services Contract was presented to the Districts in
June, the Districts and we each anticipated certain matters. In
fact, several significant matters turned out not to be as
anticipated. As examples,
Anticipated Matter Actual Occurrence
The financing would progress In fact, the financing
in a prompt manner, as had (through no fault of the
past financings for the Districts or Mudge Rose) took
Districts. Ninety to 120 days six months to complete. This
would have been expected. resulted in uncontemplated
additional effort by Mudge
Rose.
The financing would involve In fact, District Nos. 5, 6, 7
only Districts 1, 2 and 3 . and 11 were added to the
financing. This addition
resulted in uncontemplated
additional effort by Mudge
Rose.
Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca
January 7, 1993
Page 3
Anticipated Matter Actual Occurrence
AIG-FP, the counterparty on In fact, the documents
the swap underlying the presented by AIG-FP were quite
transaction, was prepared to different, from a business and
enter into the same legal point of view, from
transaction with the Districts those used in the SCPPA
as it had with SCPPA, with financing. Mudge Rose
substantially the same terms, analyzed the differences for
documents and bank and the Districts, and assisted at
insurer, with only minor length in negotiating and
differences. The SCPPA adjusting the documents to
transaction, in which Mudge provide a better deal for the
Rose served as bond counsel Districts. As a result of
and which was the first these efforts, the Districts
financing of this type, received the best deal from
provided to SCPPA the most AIG-FP since the SCPPA
favorable terms of any of such transaction. These efforts,
transactions. however, resulted in
uncontemplated additional work
by Mudge Rose.
In fact, the documents
presented by the bank started
out like the SCPPA standby
agreement. However, the bank
(not Mudge Rose or the
Districts) changed the
approach, to be a letter of
credit. After substantial
negotiation by Districts staff
and Mudge Rose, we produced a
letter of credit agreement
better than the originally
presented standby agreement.
As you know, we were required
to go back to the Hoards for
approval of this new approach.
This resulted in
uncontemplated additional
effort by Mudge Rose.
Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca
January 7, 1993
Page 4
Anticipated Matter Actual Occurrence
In fact, the insurer also
presented different document
provisions, including those
seeking to preclude the
Districts from terminating the
swap. As you know, the
ability to terminate the swap
was a very basic premise of
the Districts undertaking the
transaction; it was discussed
and agreed to at the very
first meeting with AIG-FP.
Mudge Rose and the Districts
staff aggressively negotiated,
and Mudge Rose prepared, the
provisions which allowed the
Districts the needed
termination rights. This
resulted in uncontemplated
additional effort by Mudge
Rose.
National Westminster and FGIC In fact, FGIC did consent
would promptly render the without significant
necessary consents, without negotiation. National
significant negotiation. Westminster, however, required
the negotiation and
preparation of an amendment to
the underlying documents for
their financing. As you know,
Districts 13 and 14 are
required to take additional
action in this regard.
Beneficial Service to the Districts
The Mudge Rose effort in this financing was strong, responsive
and of very significant assistance to the Districts, from both a
legal and a business point of view.
(1) Mudge Rose identified business points, and worked
constantly with Districts staff to negotiate the best
results for the Districts.
Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca
January 7, 1993
Page 5
(2) Mudge Rose and Districts staff succeeded in negotiating
terms for the financing which make the financing
demonstrably better for the Districts than similar
financings done for other borrowers. We know that you, as
part of your diligence, have documented a number of these
successes.
(3) Mudge Rose worked tirelessly toward the success of the
financing. Our people worked long into the night many
nights, and worked over a number of weekends, to secure the
success of the financing. In November alone, our people
including Carolyn Clark and Leeanna Izuel (who were
responsible for the letter of credit and insurance related
documents, and the principal financing documents) , Sam Poss
(who was responsible for the swap and liquidity guaranty and
related documents) and Brant Freer (who was responsible for
the Federal tax exemption matters) , put in 595 hours.
Carolyn and Leeanna each put in over 180 hours that month.
All told, we put in over 1,250 hours to accomplish the
financing.
Services contract Authority
The Services Contract provides, after establishing the $110, 000
cap, that
"The cap applies to ordinary services in the
contemplated financing, and does not apply to
charges for additional services required due
to circumstances beyond the control of Mudge
Rose such as substantial changes in the
structure of the contemplated financing,
material time delays, or adverse litigation
or legislation. We will notify the Districts
before expending any substantial time in
providing any such additional services. "
In this regard, we note that
(a) The greatly increased level of services was beyond the
ordinary, was due to circumstances beyond the control of
Mudge Rose, and resulted very substantially from changes
from the contemplated structure and from material time
delays.
(b) Clearly the level of services required to complete the
financing was significantly greater than the $110,000
Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca
January 7, 1993
Page 6
contemplated in the Services Contract in June, as over
$117, 000 of services were required in November alone.
(c) We notified Districts staff, in early November, that
significant additional services were required to complete
the assignment to the satisfaction of the Districts. At
that time, Districts staff advised us that
(i) Districts staff had authority from the Boards at
that time to pay Mudge Rose compensation for services
up to $110,000,
(ii) any additional compensation for Mudge Rose
services would have to be approved by the Boards, with
direction from the Fiscal Policy Committee, and
(iii) the Districts desired for us to continue the
level of services needed to complete the financing, and
to submit the compensation issue to the Boards once the
work was complete and the time expended was known.
(d) At all times in our dealings with the Districts and
Districts staff, we have been treated professionally, `—
honestly and fairly, and we have had no reason to believe
that the matter of additional compensation would be treated
in any other fashion.
I appreciate your cooperation in this regard. If you,
the Fiscal Policy Committee or the Boards wish us to provide
additional information, please do not hesitate to let me know.
Sincerely,
Edward W. L
EWL:mdt
v
MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER S, FERDON
uo.Auo.N uNa 21 Sr FLOOR
Nzw.own,icw To•x ooaa •eae wsaxo+ox.o.c.aoavan
a i esi o >oo0 333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE
+oa •:sSass
`/ uo n• vcxuc LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90071-I52S ....... ccxac
Sw+c�sso 21 3-61 3-11 1 2 sn no•rN ruoLc•S•wc
xaw roan.N.+. mi �.oiu wcST PALM CACN.rL.33w1.A334
a y.aaa. soo NO,.00...GO
xo•nS CmvO•Arc CCNTw+wo •.c aiM M1C
ONa u••c•roxo•o•o noo.o z a-aeo see t.we oc u•A..
>ataa.•A•.S.AANCC
eA11a V•AMp M FRJ OIIS CTo>aS)-IO>e a •h er V T
aa�-a]SCOO•
ro•ANoxoN a> No•,exiLoiNo
a-i +a lrwxeNON a.CN ON c.NiNATo nV
LOW MAN W. aoeo +oxvo me.,.•AN
•An+xu Qom a•a>zeei
w•ocrS o+sa+N�.ec•
(213) 229-2301
(Voicemul)
March 11, 1993
Ms. Patricia M. Gorczyca
Financial Manager
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Dear Ms. Gorczyca:
I refer you to my January 7, 1993 letter, concerning
additional billing with respect to the Districts' Refunding
Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series financing. The
reasons and bases for the additional billing are spelled out in
that letter.
I have also had extensive discussions with the
Districts' Staff (in particular you and Messrs. Sylvester and
Streed) concerning the reasons and bases for the additional
billing.
This letter confirms that, as a result of those
discussions, I have proposed that the additional billing be
$70, 000. This would result in a total service charge billing of
$180, 000 (the June 1992 contract amount of $110, 000, plus the
additional $70, 000) .
This letter also confirms that I have advised you that
the total amount of our booked (vs. billed) service charges with
respect to the financing is approximately $280, 000. Accordingly,
the proposed adjustment would result in a write-off by Mudge Rose
of approximately $100, 000 of service charges.
If you have any questions with respect hereto, please
do not hesitate to call me .
Sincerely,
Edward W. Zong
EWL:sb
MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER & FERDON
.uo[x ux[ SUITE 2020 +m...w.
.[w.own.xew♦own ioov w x� crow.ec.]wa>
_ u.000 333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE a . ..ea
[a
]— LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071
uc>nx wcw�a awn wo.xo+ ...... c[x.wc
wm�... 213-613-1 1 12 ms xoww ruV.q owrv[
may-uoo .o>.uoum
,. —LC:
.o++a cowrow.rc cwi[w.wo z a aeo u]e z.w[oe u.aw
A.e.00.o
.ews r..♦..v n....once. ^• . .
zoi »none. ♦ .ex . w».eu m.....
] i0u • v . nxtlO.nV
♦ .O'O[.o.n.0
0l1)OiIO�
wq♦O a Ou[O xVna[+
(213) 229-2301
June 18, 1992
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708-7018
Attention: Mr. Gary Streed
Ladies and Gentlemen:
At the request of Patricia Gorczyca of the Districts'
Staff, we submit the following proposed arrangement for our
services and compensation in connection with the proposed advance
refunding of the outstanding 1986 Certificates of Participation of
District Nos. 1, 2 and 3 (now projected for late 1992 (the
"Refunding Financing") .
The arrangement proposed herein is separate from the
Districts' services agreements with Rourke i Woodruff. The Rourke
8 Woodruff services and compensation related to the financing
program are to be as provided for under such agreements.
If the Districts' accept this proposal, this letter will
constitute the agreement between the Districts and Mudge Rome with
respect to the matters covered hereby.
Services to be Provided
Different financing structures require bond counsel to
prepare and review distinct documents and legal issues. Without _
detailing the specifics of the different structures being
considered, we will provide the following services to the Districts
in connection with the Refunding Financing:
• assist the Districts ' in the review of financing
structures proposed, and the selection of the actual
structure to be used in the Refunding Financing; and
• advise the Districts concerning the relationship of the
Districts' outstanding borrowings to the proposed
Refunding Financing structure; and
• prepare or participate in the preparation of all
documents, review all legal issues and render advice with
respect to the structure selected by the Districts for
the Refunding Financing. Such documents would include,
as needed, ordinances, resolutions, acquisition
agreements, installment purchase agreements, interest
rate swap agreements, trust agreements, purchase
contracts, letters of credit, liquidity agreements, -
reimbursement agreements, resolutions, offering
documents, legal opinions and closing papers.
Individuals to Provide Services
All services hereunder would be provided by personnel
located in our Los Angeles office (although, if needed, the
resources of our other offices will be available) .
Edward Long (Partner, Finance) and Brant Freer (Partner,
Tax) will direct and be responsible for the Mudge Rose services to
the Districts. Other attorneys located in the Loa Angeles Office
will assist in providing the Mudge Rose services.
Charoes
We propose that, in general, we be compensated for our
services on the basis of our normal billing rates for the .services
provided. Based on that general approach, we propose that:
Services
Our service charges with respect to the Rafunding
Financinq will be subject to a cap (set forth below) , which
will limit the amount which we may charge the Districts for
such services. The cap applies to ordinary services in the
contemplated financing, and does not apply to charges for
additional services required due to circumstances beyond the
+scV0V\9eev\os000sanoo 2
control of Mudge Rose such as substantial changes in the
structure of the contemplated financing, material time delays,
or adverse litigation or legislation. We will notify the
Districts before expending any substantial time in providing
any such additional services.
The Districts are considering at this time two different
Certificates of Participation structures for the Refunding
Financing: (a) a regular fixed rate refunding (the Regular
Structure-) ; and (b) a synthetic fixed rate structure, using
variable rate obligations, insurance, liquidity and a long-
term interest rate swap (the "synthetic Fixed Structure-) .
The number of hours of services required for Mudge Rose
to complete the Refunding Financing will vary depending upon
which of the structures is utilized. We agree that the
following cap amounts will apply to the Refunding Financing:
(a) if the Regular Structure is utilized, a cap of
$80, 000;
(b) if the Synthetic Fixed Structure is utilized, a cap
of $110,000.
We would forego billing for services with respect to the
Refunding Financing until the closing or until the financing
is abandoned.
Expenses
Separately, we would be reimbursed for costs and charges
incurred in rendering services to the Districts.
Reimbursement would cover reproduction costs; telephone and
telecopier charges; word processing charges; messenger,
delivery and mail services; printing costs; preparation and
binding of transcripts, if any; and travel and transportation
costs; and similar charges and costs. We would bill for such
charges and costs at the time of billing for the related
services.
��c\+mr\rr�u\caooacooe 3
Termination
This agreement may be terminated by either party at any
time, without cause. In such event, the Districts agree to pay for `.
all services rendered and related costs and charges incurred up to
the time of notification of termination.
--------------------------------
we thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal.
If we may provide additional information, please do not hesitate to
call upon me.
If this proposal is acceptable to the Districts, please
indicate your acceptance by returning to us a copy of this letter
dated and signed by an authorized official of the Districts.
Very truly yours,
MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE
ALEXANDER & FERDON
By L-�GJ
Edward ong
cc: Thomas Woodruff, Esq.
ACCEPTED this Bth day of
July , 1992:
COUNTY
rSTAT D STRI
CT
S OF
Oy IA
BTGralima6ker
a Official is C\10O\MLL6\Ce00c1=o0c 4
CSDOC --REFUNDING COPS
Mudge Rose Cumulative Effort
300
250 _ ......... ......... ... ...................... ......_ ..
N 200 ... . . . ........
0
o �
o �
1 5 0 ... .................. .........
4 O
U �
m 100 .......
50
0
Jul-92 Sep-92 Nov-92
Aug-92 Oct-92 Dec-92
CSDOC —REFUNDING COPS
Mudge Rose Monthly Effort
120 -
100 - ........... .............
80 - ...........
0
0 '0
6D - ......................... .............
d) 0
40 - ........... ........ ................................
(A
20 - ..........
D 7
Jul-92 Sep-9 2 Nov-9 2
Aug-9 2 Dct-92 Dec-9 2
COMPARISON OF BOND COUNSEL FEES
COMPARABLE BTNTHETIC FI%ED RAZE TRANSACTIONS
ISSUER PAR AMOUNT FEE TIME FRAME HOURS FIRM STRUCTURE FEE ARRANGEMENT
San Diego County Regional 4141,600,000 /2001000 8/92-10/14192 BOB Ordck Similar to CSOOC Straight Hourly Agmament
Transportation Commission No Maximum
Scuthem California Aeaoo. 4293,000,000 $300,000 12/9O4/17/91 1,871.2 Mudge Rove Fina Ever Tremaction Total Foe
of Public Power Authadtiee Negotiated a End
New Jerery Sport.and $209,990,000 6200,000 2/92-11192 Flat Fes Mudge Rwe Similar to CSDOC Total Fee
ExpaeWon Authority No Hour. Negotiated at End
Loa Angalae County 6200,ODO,000 6180,000 3/92.6/92 Not Avdl, O-Melvaney Two Separate leauae No Increase Rpumt
Tramportation Commission Negotiated of Beginning,
Lump Sum
City of Anaheim 6130,000,000 /110,000 7192-1193 Not Avail. Jonas Hell Complete Structure Flat Fee Negotiated at
Charge-fixed to Beginning-No Fee
Synthtic fixed;dual track In.....
Orionis County Sanitation 411B01800,000 11110,000 6/92-12192 1,259 Mudge Rode Advance Refunding Re Fee Negotiated at
Districts of Orange County Flowing to Fixed Beginn n, In.....Odgimlly
SWAP to Maturity Requosted of up to 4181,000
6180,000 for Total Cote of $280,000.
Requested Increase Now
At$70,000 Far .Total
Fee of$180.000
3111/93 SFRT.%LS
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
21 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
I,a.BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-0127
March 18, 1993 nln 062.2411
(Revised)
MEMORANDUM
TO: Director Buck Catlin
SUBJECT: Districts' Investment Policies
Thank you for your thoughtful review and memorandum regarding investment
policies. You have raised very important questions which are certainly relevant and
need to be addressed.
First, let me emphasize that Districts' staff has neither a position nor a
recommendation on this issue. We are simply responding to a directive from the
Executive Committee and attempting to provide the Directors with the best
�./ information possible to aid them in evaluating this matter and arrive at a Board
policy decision.
Accordingly, we are pleased to provide you with the following information to
address each of the issues raised in your March B, 1993, memo. For ease of
review, we have restated each of the issues using the exact language in your
memo.
1. Issue: There is an investment risk associated with reverse repurchase
agreements. The District is not only at risk with respect to broker.
but also at risk with respect to a volatile interest rate market.
The policy that we have been asked to draft sets forth careful controls
and procedures to reduce broker risk and to effectively manage
interest rate risks. With regard to broker risk, there are no immediate
plans to use the services of a broker. The Districts would work solely
with SEC registered dealers, in particular our current underwriter
Merrill Lynch. The City of Orange used an unqualified broker not
governed by SEC scrutiny which would not be allowed under the
District's proposed Master Purchase Agreement.
Director Buck Catlin
Districts' Investment Policies
Page 2
March 18, 1993 (Revised)
Under the proposed reverse repurchase program, there is limited
dealer risk because of the collateralization portion of the transaction.
If Merrill Lynch disappears with the Districts' $50 million in Treasury
securities, the Districts have the commensurate cash and securities in
a separate custodial account.
With regard to interest rate risk, once the reverse repurchase
agreement is in place, there is no interest rate risk because both rates
are set by the agreement and purchase. The Treasury market can,
however, fluctuate during the 90-day period which will affect the
value of the Treasurys providing collateral. If, in a worst case
scenario, treasury rates would increase by three points or more, the
Districts would be required to buy some additional Treasurys at
higher, more attractive rates to provide additional collateral.
2. Issue: There is the moral issue of utilizing County Sanitation funds to
double-dip. by taking advantaae of the District's ability to issue tax-
exempt debt. Why would a broker loan money at 3,25% when the
broker could invest at 5.6% in U.S. aovernment obligations? - -
because the broker is exchanaina a short-term loan for the security of
a Iona-term investment.
Perhaps there is a misunderstanding with regard to how Districts' debt
issuance proceeds are handled. The Districts do = deposit debt
proceeds into the County commingled pool and, in fact, are actually
prevented from doing so by the transaction documents. We would
not support the use of bond proceeds to fund a reverse repurchase
program. Under a reverse repurchase program, the Districts would
borrow and lend both in the taxable market.
Regarding the second point, dealers do not invest in securities.
Dealers hold an Inventory of securities only for a short period of time,
not for investment. Dealers receive their compensation from the
market-determined price of the securities. The Districts are not
charged a broker fee.
Director Buck Catlin
Districts' Investment Policies
Page 3
March 18, 1993 (Revised)
3. Issue: The District currently earns 8.17%. Is an additional 2.35%
worth the tremendous risk associated with brokers? The City of
Orange lost $7 million trustino brokers. as did many other
oovernmental agencies.
The City of Orange, and other agencies involved in the ITM and similar
scandals, were victims of fraud and illegal operations. It is not a
problem inherent to brokers. As noted above under Issue 1, the City
of Orange used an unqualified broker not governed by the SEC which
would not be allowed under Districts' procedures. Staff, in
consultation with the Districts' independent auditors, has implemented
a system of internal controls to avoid such problems.
4. Issue: The Orange County Treasurer has over $5 billion to invest. not
$1 billion. There is a tremendous advantage in havino such a sizable
portfolio to invest. especially with the expertise of Bob Citron.
This conclusion implies two advantages to having the County
Treasurer investing Districts' funds: expertise and the size of the
portfolio. Certainly no one questions Bob Citron's expertise and long
history of above market earnings. It is not proposed to withdraw any
Districts' funds from the County. In fact, the draft reverse repurchase
agreement policy under consideration assumes continued investment
of all Districts' reserves by the County Treasurer. The proposed
program requires pre-approved investments and quarterly reports, and
will operate under a strict investment policy, a master agreement, and
careful accounting procedures. Should the program under
consideration be approved by the Joint Boards and demonstrate
effective management and sufficient earnings, broader investment
proposals may be considered by the Joint Boards in the future.
With regard to the magnitude of the County's portfolio, the key
advantage to the County's and other substantial investment programs
(a Districts' $50 M reverse repurchase program would be considered
substantial) is the attention received from the investment community
which produces beneficial financial advice and program monitoring.
Director Buck Catlin
Districts' Investment Policies
Page 4
March 18, 1993 (Revised)
5. Issue: The City of Anaheim has five employees charaed with handling
the City's $200 million portfolio. The District would likely reauire
eauivalent staffing to handle their own oortfolio.
It is our understanding that the City of Anaheim's program requires
five people because that group's responsibility also involves daily cash
management, revenue collection, and other fiscal duties, as well as
investment. In our case, different divisions within our Finance
Department handle those other duties. The County of Orange has
three individuals investing and managing their $5 billion portfolio.
Staff has very carefully evaluated the investing and accounting efforts
necessary to administer the proposed $50 million reverse repurchase
agreement program and is comfortable that the proposed program can
be accomplished without additional staff. One reason for this is that
our Financial Manager has been working on several "special projects"
which are winding down, thus freeing time for other work such as
this.
6. Issue: As District staff admits in the proposal. investment
performance will be reduced as short-term interest rates rise.
Certainly one of the givens is that performance will fluctuate over
time. Historically, the yield curve, which determines short and long-
term rates, is usually positively sloped; that is, long-term rates will be
higher than short-term. The difference between the two is referred to
as spread. Clearly, the spread between the two can contract or
expand over time, permitting a lesser or greater return. The current
market spread is especially attractive for a reverse repurchase
program.
If the program is approved, the financial team will monitor the
relationship between short and long-term rates, and the treasury and
reverse repo market using a sophisticated on-line, computerized
financial markets monitoring system called Bloomberg. The
Bloomberg system is the same one used by dealers such as Merrill
Lynch, the County of Orange, Orange County Water District, Irvine
Ranch Water District and other public agencies with substantial
investment programs.
Director Buck Catlin
Districts' Investment Policies
i Page 5
March 18, 1993 (Revised)
Once again, I would like to thank you for your thoughtful review and comments. If
you have further questions or would like additional information, please feel free to
contact our Finance Director, Gary Streed, or our Financial Manager, Patti
Gorczyca. They would also be pleased to discuss this matter with your City's
financial staff. We will be providing your memo and a copy of this memorandum
to the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee for their
consideration.
J. Wayne Sylvester
General Manager
JWS:lc
`� flEF:C:\IWGOtG\rPC.MTGIMMPGFPC3.1]
Attachment
cc: William D. Mahoney, Joint Chairman
Charles E. Puckett, Fiscal Policy Committee Chairman
MEMORANDUM
To: Bill Mahoney, Joint Boards Chairman, CSDOC
Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, CSDOC
Chuck Puckett, Fiscal Policy Committee Chairman
FROM: Buck Catlin, Director Districts 2 & 3
DATE: March 8, 1993
SUBJECT: Reverse Repurchase Agreements Policy
I have referred our prospective revisions to the Districts'
Investment Management Policy to the city of Fullerton's Finance
Department for review with me. After a lengthy examination of the
implications incident to separately managing a portion of the
reserve fund portfolio, we have drawn a number of negative
conclusions that give me pause in recommending approval of these
revisions, viz. :
1. There is an investment risk associated with reverse
repurchase agreements. The District is not only at risk with
respect to the broker, but also at risk with respect to a volatile
interest rate market.
2. There is the moral issue of utilizing County sanitation
funds to double dip, by taking advantage of the District's ability
to issue tax-exempt debt. Why would a broker loan money at 3.25%
when the broker could invest at 5.6% in U.S. government
obligations? -- because the broker is exchanging a short-term loan
for the security of a long-term investment.
3 . The District currently earns 8.17%. Is an additional 2.35%
worth the tremendous risk associated with brokers? The City of
Orange lost $7 million trusting brokers, as did many other
governmental agencies.
4. The Orange County Treasurer has over $5 billion to invest,
not $1 billion. There is a tremendous advantage in having such a
sizable portfolio to invest, especially with the expertise of Bob
Citron.
5. The city of Anaheim has five employees charged with
handling the City's $200 million portfolio. The District would
likely require equivalent staffing to handle their own portfolio.
6. As District staff admits in the proposal, investment
performance will be reduced as short-term interest rates rise.
Conclusion Two. Concerns me in that tax free municipal bonds
were intended to provide facilities for public use and not for the
benefit of private financial companies to leverage profits or gain
better corporate income tax positions. Although legal, this does
not sit well with the public.
Conclusion Three and Four. Rather than accept the additional
risk with a private firm, I feel reassured with the expertise of
the Orange County Treasurer, notwithstanding the potential 2.35%
interest gain for the District.
Conclusion Five. I am not persuaded that overseeing this new
proposal will not require additional staff time and resources.
Accordingly, Pq District 2 and 3 Director, I am not supportive of
the opos visions to the Investment Management Policy.
A.B. Catlin
Director, Districts 2 & 3
ABC:mp
RESOLUTION NO. 93-
DESIGNATING A DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND AUTHORIZING THE
DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND THE ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER-
TAX COLLECTOR TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING A DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND
AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND THE COUNTY OF
ORANGE TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST
DISTRICTS' FUNDS
kkkkkkkkkkkk
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and
14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That is hereby appointed as Treasurer of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California.
Section 2: The authority of the Boards of Directors to invest or reinvest Districts'
surplus funds or to sell or exchange securities so purchased or to deposit for safekeeping the
funds and investments of the Districts with depositories as provided for in California Government
Code Section 53608 and 53630, is hereby delegated to the Districts' Treasurer, as authorized by
California Government Code Section 53607.
Section : The Districts' Treasurer is authorized to direct that the Districts' surplus
funds or any portion thereof be deposited into the care, custody and control of the Treasurer-Tax
Collector of the County of Orange for purposes of investment or reinvestment.
1
Section 4: That the Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County of Orange (Co. Treasurer)
be and is hereby authorized and directed to invest or to reinvest all funds belonging to the
Districts which have been transferred to the Co. Treasurer, in those instruments as authorized by
California Government Code Section 53601 and/or in deposits with depositories, as authorized by
California Government Code Section 53635. The Co. Treasurer is further authorized and
directed to sell or exchange securities so purchased and to terminate or renew deposits so made.
Each of these authorizations is to continue until the further order of the Boards of Directors of
the Districts or the Districts' Treasurer.
Section : That these investments, deposits, sales of investments, termination or
renewal of deposits, are to be made by the Districts' Treasurer and Treasurer-Tax Collector of
the County of Orange only after consultation with and direction by the General Manager of the
Districts or his designee.
Section That the Districts' Treasurer and Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County of
Orange, upon confirmation by the General Manager of the Districts, are hereby authorized and
directed to prepare such records of account as are necessary to effect the transfer of funds
required to make the indicated investments.
Section 7: In the event of the temporary absence of the Districts' Treasurer, the
Districts' General Manager is hereby delegated the authority to appoint an Acting Treasurer to
carry out the powers and duties of the office of Districts' Treasurer.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held , 1993.
akF:C:I VlPOCCSUESOS\Tu.Re
2
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (DISTRICTS)
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
FOR FUNDS CONTROLLED BY
DISTRICTS' TREASURER
March 10, 1993
Introduction
This statement is intended to specify policies for prudent investment of the
Districts' reserve funds not required for the immediate needs of the Districts and
to provide guidelines for suitable investments and safeguards for sound
investment strategies. The ultimate goal is to enhance financial return to the
Districts while protecting its cash reserves.
The investment policies and practices of the Districts' are based on federal,
�. state and local law and prudent cash management principles. The primary goals
of these policies are:
1 . To assure compliance with all federal, state and local laws governing the
investment of monies under the control of the Districts'.
2. To protect the principal monies entrusted to the Districts'.
3. To generate the maximum amount of investment income within the
parameters of this Statement of Investment Policy and the guidelines for
suitable investments.
I. AUTHORITY FOR MANAGING INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
A. Districts' Treasurer
The responsibility for the day-to-day investment of Districts'
cash is delegated to the Districts' Treasurer.
B. Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County of Oranae
The Districts may transfer all or a portion of their funds, and
responsibility for safekeeping and investment thereof, to the
Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County of Orange, who shall
manage such funds pursuant to his or her separate policies
and procedures and applicable provisions of the California
Government Code.
II. SCOPE
In accordance with Resolution No. , the District's Treasurer
is authorized to invest the Districts' funds in accordance with the
California Government Code Section 53600 at. seq. This investment
policy applies to all the Districts' reserve funds and investment
activities.
All monies entrusted to the Districts' Treasurer will be pooled in an
actively managed portfolio. The Districts' Treasurer will monitor,
evaluate and react to changing economic conditions that affect the
portfolio.
III. OBJECTIVES
A. Safety of Principal
Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the Districts'
investment policy. Each investment transaction shall seek to
ensure that capital losses are avoided, whether from institutional
default, broker-dealer default, or erosion of market value of
securities. The Districts shall seek to preserve principal by
mitigating the two types of risk, credit risk and market risk.
1 . Credit Risk. Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to
failure of an issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by
investing in only very safe institutions and by diversifying the
portfolio so that the failure of any one issuer would not
unduly harm the Districts' cash flow.
Page 2
2. Market Risk. The risk of market value fluctuations due to
overall changes in the general level of interest rates, shall be
�..i mitigated by limiting the weighted average maturity of the
Districts' portfolio to no greater than five years. It is
explicitly recognized herein, however, that in a diversified
portfolio, occasional measured losses are inevitable, and must
be considered within the context of the overall investment
return.
B. Liquidity
Liquidity is the second most important objective of the Districts'
investment policy. It is important that an investment contain the
feature of being easily sold at any time with a minimal risk of loss
of some portion of principal or interest. The Districts may
experience unexpected or unusual circumstances that result in
some investments needing to be sold to meet a contingency.
Therefore, the Districts shall maintain a high degree of liquidity in
its total cash reserves portfolio and will at all times maintain a
15% target level of highly liquid securities.
C. Return on Investment
The Districts' portfolio shall be designed to attain a better than
market-average rate of return through economic cycles. The
market-average rate of return is defined as the average return on
three-month U.S. Treasury Bills. Whenever possible, consistent
with risk limitations as defined herein and prudent investment
principles, the Treasurer shall seek to augment returns above the
market average rate of return.
IV. SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES
To protect against potential losses caused by collapse of individual
securities dealers, all securities owned by the Districts, including
collateral on repurchase agreements, but necessarily excluding securities
used as collateral for reverse repurchase agreements, shall be held in
safekeeping with "perfected interest" by a third party bank trust
department, acting as agent for the Districts under the terms of a
custody agreement executed by the bank and by the Districts. All
securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery vs.
payment procedures.
i Page 3
V. REPORTING
The Districts' Treasurer shall render a report no less than quarterly to
the Districts' Fiscal Policy Committee, Executive Committee and Joint
Boards of Directors detailing the type of investment, institution, date of
maturity, amount of deposit, current market value for all securities with
a maturity of more than 12 months, rate of interest, and such other data
as may be required by the Joint Boards of Directors. The report shall
also detail all repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and shall
reflect the relationship of the data in the report to this statement of
investment policy.
The Districts' Treasurer shall prepare a Quarterly Portfolio Performance
Analysis Report, for review by the Fiscal Policy Committee and the
Districts' independent auditors, showing average daily funds invested,
interest earned, yield and average life, and current market value. Other
subject matter would include the general condition of the portfolio,
outlook for future interest rates, and planned strategy for executing
future investment transactions.
VI. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
Generally, investments shall be made in the context of the "prudent S%.101
investor" rule, which states that:
"Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under
circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence,
discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of their
own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering
the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income
to be derived."
The Districts' investments are governed by the California Government
Code, Sections 53600 et sec. Within the context of those provisions,
the following investments are authorized, as further limited herein:
A. United States Treasury Bills, Bonds and Notes, or those certificates
of indebtedness for which the full faith and credit of the United
States are pledged for payment of principal and interest. There is
no limitation as to the percentage of the portfolio which can be
invested in this category.
Page 4
B. Covered call options on U.S. Treasury instruments described in A
above. Such options may not exceed 30 days.
C. Obligations issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association
(FNMA), the Federal Farm Credit Bank System (FFCB), the Federal
Home Loan Bank Board (FHLB), and the Federal National Mortgage
Association (FEMA). Although there is no percentage limitation on
these issues, the "prudent investor" rule shall apply for a single
agency name.
D. Bills of exchange or time drafts drawn on and accepted by a
commercial bank, otherwise known as banker's acceptances.
Banker's acceptances purchased may not exceed 270 days to
maturity or 40% of the market value of the portfolio. No more
than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be invested in
banker's acceptances issued by any one bank.
E. Commercial paper ranked P1 by Moody's Investor Services or Al
by Standard and Poor's, and issued by a domestic corporation
having assets in excess of $500,000,000 and having an A or
better rating on its long-term debentures as provided by Moody's
or Standard and Poor's. Purchases of eligible commercial paper
may not exceed 180 days to maturity nor represent more than
10% of the outstanding paper of an issuing corporation.
Purchases of commercial paper may not exceed 15% of the market
value of the portfolio. No more than 10% of the market value of
the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper issued by any
one corporation.
F. Negotiable certificates of deposit (NCD) issued by a nationally or
state-chartered bank or a state or federal savings and loan
association. Any negotiable certificates of deposit eligible for
investment shall be rated in a rating category of "A" or its
equivalent or better by a nationally recognized rating service.
Purchases of negotiable certificates of deposits may not exceed
30% of the market value of the portfolio and Districts' total
investment shall not exceed the maximum deposit as provided in
Government Code Section 53638.
G. Repurchase agreements. The Districts may invest in repurchase
agreements with banks and dealers with which the Districts have
entered into a repurchase contract which specifies terms and
conditions of repurchase agreements. The maturity of repurchase
Page 5
agreements shall not exceed one year. The market value of
securities used as collateral for repurchase agreements shall be
monitored daily by the Districts' Treasurer and will not be allowed
to fall below 100% of the value of the repurchase agreement. In
order to conform with provisions of the Federal Bankruptcy Code
which provides for the liquidation of securities held as collateral for
repurchase agreements, only securities that are direct obligations
of, or that are fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the
United States or any agency of the United States shall be eligible
collateral.
H. Reverse repurchase agreements. The Districts may invest only
with those banks and dealers with which the Districts have entered
into a repurchase agreement (see standard form of agreement
attached to Districts' Reverse Repurchase Agreement Guidelines)
outlining terms and conditions of repurchase and reverse
repurchase agreements. No more than $50 million of the market
value of the investment portfolio may be invested in reverse
repurchase agreements. The Districts may invest in reverse
repurchase agreements for two purposes:
1 . The Districts may enter into a reverse repurchase agreement
when an unanticipated cash outflow can, in the judgment of
the Treasurer, be met more advantageously by entering into a
reverse repurchase agreement than by selling securities
outright. In such a case, the reverse repurchase shall not
exceed one year, and shall be matched to a known cash
inflow of sufficient size to repay the principal and interest of
the reverse repurchase agreement.
2. The Districts may enter into reverse repurchase agreements
when funds obtained through the reverse can be reinvested in
a higher yielding security to obtain additional interest income
for the Districts at a spread deemed to be acceptable by the
Treasurer under then prevailing market conditions. Reverse
repurchase agreements entered into in accordance with this
paragraph may not exceed one year to maturity, and must be
matched as to maturity and dollars invested with its
corresponding reinvestment.
I. County of Orange Commingled Investment Pool. The Districts'
Treasurer may invest up to 100% of its cash in the County of
Orange Commingled Investment Pool established by the Treasurer-
Page 6
Tax Collector of the County of Orange for the benefit of local
agencies up to the maximum permitted by the Treasurer-Tax
..i Collector of the County of Orange.
J. Local Agency Investment Fund. The Districts may invest in the
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) established by the California
State Treasurer for the benefit of local agencies up to the
maximum permitted by state law or LAW rules.
K. Time Deposits. The Districts may invest in non-negotiable time
deposits collateralized in accordance with the California
Government Code, in those banks and savings and loan
associations which meet the requirements for investment in
negotiable certificates of deposit. Since time deposits are not
liquid, no more than 25% of the portfolio may be invested in this
category.
L. Medium-term notes of a maximum of five years maturity issued by
corporations organized and operating within the United States or
by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any
state and operating within the United States. Notes eligible for
investment shall be rated in a rating category of "A" or its
equivalent, or better, by a nationally recognized rating service. No
more than 30% of the fund may be invested in medium term
notes.
M. Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management
companies, otherwise known as mutual funds, as defined in
Section 23701(m) of the Revenue and Taxation Code, investing in
the securities and obligations as authorized by subdivisions (A) to
(L), inclusive, of that section and which comply with the
investment restrictions (California Government Code) commencing
with Section 53601. No more than 15% of the fund may be
invested in mutual funds. Companies shall either:
1 . Attain the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical
rating provided by not less than two of the three largest
nationally recognized rating services, and;
2. Have an investment registered with the Securities and
Exchange Commission with not less than five years'
experience investing in the securities and obligations as
authorized by subdivisions (a) to (m), inclusive and with
a i Page 7
assets under management in excess of five hundred million
dollars ($500,000,000). The purchase price of shares of
beneficial interest, (mutual funds) purchase pursuant to this
subdivision shall not include any commission that these
companies may charge.
N. Collateralized Negotiable Investment. The Districts may invest in
notes, bonds, or other obligations which are at all times secured by
a valid first priority security interest. The securities serving as
collateral shall be placed by delivery or book entry into the custody
of a trust company or the trust department of a bank which is not
affiliated with the issuer of the secured obligation, and the security
interest shall be perfected in accordance with the requirements of
the Uniform Commercial Code or Federal regulations applicable to
the types of securities in which the security interest is granted.
0. Ineligible investments. Investments not described herein,
including, but not limited to common stocks are prohibited from
use. Any potential exceptions to the policy will be submitted to
the Boards of Directors for review and policy determinations.
VII. QUALIFIED DEALERS AND INSTITUTIONS
The Districts shall transact business only with banks, savings and loans,
and registered investment securities dealers. The purchase by the
Districts of any investment other than those purchased directly from the
issuer, shall be purchased either from an institution licensed by the State
of California as a broker-dealer, as defined in Section 25004 of the
California Corporations Code, who is a member of a the National
Association of Securities Dealers, or a member of a federally regulated
securities exchange, a national or state-chartered bank, a federal or
state association (as defined by Section 5102 of the California Financial
Code), or a brokerage firm designated as a Primary Government Dealer
by the Federal Reserve Bank.
The Districts' Treasurer shall investigate all institutions which the
Districts select to do business with in order to determine if they are
adequately capitalized, make markets in securities appropriate to the
Districts' needs, and agree to abide by the conditions set forth in the
Districts' Investment Policy.
Page 8 �./
Vill. INVESTMENT CONTROLS
The Districts' Director of Finance has developed a system of internal
investment controls and a segregation of responsibilities of investment
functions in order to assure an adequate system of internal control over
the investment function. These controls include:
• Separating investment transaction authority from accounting and
record keeping;
• Custodial safekeeping of investments;
• Periodic statements from custodial banks;
• Clear designation of authority and chain of command;
• Written confirmation of telephone transactions;
• Two signatures to authorize a transaction;
• Minimizing the number of authorized investment officials;
• Documentation of transactions and strategies;
• Review of contracts and agreements by legal counsel
IX. POLICY REVIEW
This Investment Policy shall be reviewed at least annually to ensure its
consistency with the overall objectives of safety of principal, liquidity,
and return on investment, and its relevance to current law, financial and
economic trends, and to meet the needs of the Districts.
REFZAWP CSVNVEST.KY TW
Page 9
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY (DISTRICTS)
TREASURER
REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT GUIDELINES
March 10, 1993
INTRODUCTION
The Districts recognize that the reverse repurchase agreement (Reverse Repo)
can be an effective investment vehicle for increasing the overall earnings on its
cash reserves and, therefore, the Districts' Statement of Investment Policy
permits the Districts to invest in reverse repurchase agreements not exceeding
$50 million of the Districts' total cash reserves.
GENERAL GUIDELINES
To protect the Districts' cash reserves invested through repurchase agreements,
the following guidelines are hereby established governing the Districts' use of
repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements.
These safety measures include:
a) careful selection of banks and securities dealers.
b) proper collateralization procedures and pricing practices.
c) delivery of collateral to the Districts or its custodian; and
d) use of a master repurchase agreement.
SELECTION OF BANK AND DEALERS
The Districts' Treasurer shall exercise special caution in selecting parties with
whom to conduct repurchase transactions and be able to identify the parties
acting as principals to the transaction. Such requirements are detailed in the
Districts' Master Repurchase Agreement, described below.
COLLATERALIZATION PRACTICES
Proper collateralization practices are necessary to protect the Districts' cash
invested in repurchase agreements. Risk is significantly reduced through
physical delivery of underlying securities for safekeeping with the Districts'
custodian. Overcollateralization, commonly referred to as "haircuts," or marking
to market practices, shall be mandatory procedures. Such requirements are
detailed in the Districts' Master Repurchase Agreement, described below.
MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT
The master repurchase agreement is an "umbrella" contract that will govern all
individual repurchase agreement transactions between the Districts and a
depository or securities dealer. The master agreement provides the general
terms under which each transaction will be conducted. The master agreement
establishes the legal responsibilities of both parties in each transaction, recites
what laws will govern the transaction, and provides contractual rights for the
Districts in the event that the other party defaults. In any event of default,
these contractual rights are particularly important to the Districts, because
receivers and bankruptcy courts tend to recognize the claims of parties to a
written contract more readily than those whose interests are undocumented.
The Districts' Master Repurchase Agreement, a standard copy of which is
attached hereto, contains each of the following provisions and safeguards:
Definitions: The agreement sets forth definitions for such terms as act of
insolvency, default, purchased securities, margin amount, confirmation,
income margin excess, market value, price differential, pricing rate,
purchase date, and repurchase price.
Execution Procedures: The agreement indicates how a repurchase
transaction is initiated, whether confirmations are necessary, and how the
agreement is terminated.
Representations: The agreement provides certain representations
between the buyer and seller. These representations include expectations
of the two parties, and a reaffirmation of legal authority to transact
business.
Event of Default: The most important provision of the agreement is the
concise listing of events of default. The agreement identifies those
conditions under which special remedies become necessary. Events of
default include acts of insolvency, misrepresentations, failure to deliver,
and other events that would threaten the interests of one of the parties.
It also establishes the liability of the defaulting party.
Page 2
z Governing Law: The agreement establishes the State of California as the
jurisdiction governing transactions.
u Purchased Securities (Repo "Collateral"): The agreement identifies what
securities constitute eligible instruments for delivery under the repurchase
transaction.
Substitution: The agreement indicates whether the seller may substitute
securities, and if so, the limitations on such substitutions. It identifies
who pays for the cost of transferring substituted securities.
Overcollateralization (Haircuts): The agreement provides for excess
collateral as a protection for investors. The Districts have established a
collateralization ratio of 2% in the master agreement.
Marking to Market: The agreement provides for "margin maintenance" or
other methods for valuing and adjusting the collateral securities held
under the repurchase agreement, so that price losses in the marketplace
are compensated by the seller delivering additional collateral to
safekeeping.
Supplemental Terms and Conditions: The agreement may be amended or
supplemented, as necessary.
..r Accounting Procedures: The Districts' Director of Finance has developed
a system of internal investment controls and a segregation of
responsibilities of investment functions in order to assure an adequate
system of internal control over the investment function. The following
accounting procedures are required to assure proper accounting for
reverse repurchase agreements:
• The underlying securities will be included as investments (assets) in
the Districts' financial statements. The securities will be included in
the Districts' investment footnote disclosure as "investments held
by broker-dealers under reverse repurchase agreements."
• The payment required to repurchase the securities will be shown as
a liability in the Districts' financial statements with a caption such
as "obligations under reverse repurchase agreements."
• The Districts will track income on the securities net of interest
expense on the repurchase liability in separate general ledger
accounts from other investment income.
• Financial statement disclosures regarding the market value of the
securities and credit exposure will be prepared.
Page 3
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES ,
The following additional implementation guidelines are established to direct and
govern the Districts' reverse repurchase agreements:
A. The Districts' Treasurer may invest up to $50 million of its cash
reserves in reverse repurchase agreements via pre-approval of
investments by the Fiscal Policy Committee.
B. The Districts' Treasurer will report quarterly to the Fiscal Policy
Committee, Executive Committee and Joint Boards of Directors on
reverse repurchase agreement investment performance.
V
REF:CAWP CSVNVEST.GLY MRSEAM -
Page 4
r a�iCtiJ , 4;*0na :Zia AVvd4a, nLvetur:, Jraa .v 70LJ704 (l1YU Vie
z boo
MISTER REPURCAASF ACRFFMFiVT
THIS MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT is made and entered into,to be effecttve
this _ day of 1993, by and between:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. I OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
hereinafter referred to as "Buyer";
AND
MERRILL LYNCH GOVERNMENT SECURITIES INC., hereinafter
referred to as "Seller".
WITNESSETH:
Section 1: Annlicability. From time to time, the parties hereto may enter into
transactions in which one party ("Seller") agrees to transfer to the other ("Buyer") securities or
r.. financial instruments ("Securities") against the transfer of funds to Buyer, with a simultaneous
agreement by Buyer to transfer to Seller such Securities at a date certain or on demand, against
the transfer of funds by Seller. Each such transaction shall be referred to herein as a
"Transaction" and shall be governed by this Agreement, including any supplemental terms or
conditions contained in Annex I, attached hereto.
Section 2: Definition .
(a) "Act of Insolvency", with respect to any party, (i) the commencement by
such party as debtor of any case or proceeding under any bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization, liquidation, dissolution or similar law, or such party seeking the appointment of
a receiver, trustee, custodian or similar official for such patty or any substantial part of its
property; or(ii) the commencement of any such case or proceeding against such party or another
seeking such an appointment, or the filing against a parry of an application for a protective
decree under the provisions of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, which (A) is
consented to or not timely contested by such party, (B) results in the entry of an order for relief,
such an appointment, the issuance of such a protective decree or the entry of an order having
a similar effect, or (C) is not dismissed within 15 days; (iii) the making by a party of a general
assignment for the benefit of creditors; or(iv) the admission in writing by a party of such parry's
inability to pay such parry's debts as they become due.
(b) "Additional Purchased Securities", securities provided by Seller to Buyer
pursuant to Section 4(a) hereof;
ttv:vl(afAm:,trva 1
UJ-1.11J il:4 .hl :cVa lv VaAE, 6UUL11aW:. J[aA ra bQLJ904 -VUb- u:G
(c) "Buyer's Margin Amount", with respect to any Transaction as of any date,
the amount obtained by application of a percentage (which may be equal to the percentage that
is agreed to as the Seller's Margin Amount under subparagraph (q) of this Section), agreed to
by Buyer and Seller prior to entering into the Transaction, to the Repurchase Price for such
Transaction as of such date;
(d) "Confirmation", the meaning specified in Section 3(b) hereof;
(e) "Income", with respect to any Security at any time, any principal thereof
then payable and all interest dividends or other distributions thereon;
(f) "Margin Deficit", the meaning specified in Section 4(a) hereof.
(g) "Margin Excess", the meaning specified in Section 4(b) hereof;
(h) "Market Value", with respect to any Securities as of any date, the price
for such Securities on such date obtained from a generally recognized source, plus accrued
Income to the extent not included therein (other than any Income credited or transferred to, or
applied to the obligations of, Seller pursuant to Section 5 hereof) as of such date(unless contrary
to market practice for such Securities);
(i) "Price Differential", with respect m any Transaction hereunder as of any
date, the aggregate amount obtained by daily application of the Pricing Rate for such
Ttansactions to the Purchase Price for such Transaction on a 360-day per year basis for the
actual number of days during the period commencing on (and including) the Purchase Date for
such Transaction and ending on (but excluding) the date of determination (rrxluced by any
amount of such Price Differential previously paid by Seller to Buyer with respect to such
Transaction);
0) "Pricing Rate", the per annum percentage rate for determination of the
Price Differential;
(k) "Prime Rate", the prime rate of U.S. money center commercial bank. as
published in "The Wall Street foumal";
(1) "Purchasing Date", the date on which Purchased Securities are transferred
by Seller to Buyer,
(m) "Purchase Price", (i) on the Purchase Date, the price at which Purchased
Securities are transferred by Seller to Buyer, and (it) thereafter, such price increased by the
amount of any cash transferred by Buyer to Seller pursuant to Section 4(b) hereof and decreased
by the amount of any cash transferred by Seller to Buyer pursuant to Section 4(a) hereof or
applied to reduce Seller's obligations under clause (ii) of Section 5 hereof;
rcw:viwss,mn,na 2
" V�tL'y: tt:{p8a fEWI AVUhhL, aVV ULVr:, Jr Ea 1J yp(Vyeµ ;Jpy, VI
z
\.� (n) "Purchased Securities", the Securities transferred by Seller to Buyer in a
Transaction hereunder, and shall include only those Securities authorized under Government
Code Section 53635. The term "Purchased Securities", with respect to any Transaction at any
time, also shall include Additional Purchased Securities delivered pursuant to Section 4(a) and
shall exclude Securities returned pursuant to Section 4(b);
(o) "Repurchase Date", the date on which Seller is to repurchase the Purchased
Securities from Buyer, including any date determined by application of the provisions of Sections
3(c) or 11 hereof.
(p) "Repurchase Price", the price at which Purchased Securities are to be
transferred from Buyer to Seller upon termination of a Transaction, which will be determined
in each case (including Transactions terminable upon demand), as the sum of the Purchase Price
and the Price Differential as of the date of such determination, increased by any amount
determined by the application of the provisions of Section 11 hereof:
(q) "Seller's Margin Amount", with respect to any Transaction as of any date,
the amount obtained by application of a percentage (which may be equal to the percentage that
is agreed to as the Buyer's Margin Amount under subparagraph (c) of this Section), agreed to
by Buyer and Seller prior to entering into the Transaction, to the Repurchase Price for such
Transaction as of such date.
�r Section3: Initiation: Confirmation: Termination.
(a) An agreement to enter into a Transaction may be made orally or in writing
at the initiation of either Buyer or Seller. On the Purchase Date for the Transaction, the
Purchased Securities shall be transferred to Buyer or its agent against the transfer of the
Purchase Price to an account of Seller.
(b) Upon agreeing to enter into a'rransacnon nereunder, buyer or Scllcr (vi
both), as shall be agreed, shall promptly deliver to the other party, a written confirmation of
each Transaction (a "Confirmation"). The Confirmation shall describe the Purchased Securities
(including CUSPID number, if any), identify Buyer and Seller, and set forth (i) the Purchase
Date, (ii) the Purchase Price, (iii) the Repurchase Date, unless the Transaction is to be
terminable on demand, (iv) the Pricing Rate or Repurchase Price applicable to the Transactinn,
and (v) additional terms or conditions of the Transaction not inconsistent with the Agreement.
The Confirmation. together with this Agreement, shall constitute conclusive evidence of the
terms agreed between Buyer and Seller with respect to the Transaction to which the
Confirmation relates, unless with respect to the Confirmation, specific objection is made
promptly after receipt thereof. In the event of any conflict between the terms of such
Confirmation and this Agreement, this Agreement shall prevail.
(c) In the case of Transactions terminable upon demand, such demand shall
be made by Buyer or Seller, no later than such time as is customary in accordance with market
TLw:ry'(055)Ip/IIK) 3
w-ic'a: u :.a:.:u rcvm r,cvar:n, sv�ror,urr, ucn :v 9L:aaar rUU�:Vio ,
a
practice, by telephone or otherwise on or prior to the business day on which such termination
will be effective. On the date specified in such demand, or on the date fixed for termination in
the case of Transactions having a fixed term, termination of the Transaction will be effected by
transfer to Seller or its agent of the Purchased Securities and any income in respect thereof
received by Buyer (and not preciously credited or transferred to, or applied to the obligations
of, Seller pursuant to Section 5 hereof) against the transfer of the Repurchase Price to an account
of Buyer.
Section 4: Marein Maintenance,
(a) If at any time the aggregate Market Value of all Purchased Securities
subject to all Transactions in which a particular party hereto is acting as Buyer is less than the
aggregate Buyer's Margin Amount for all such Transactions (a "Margin Deficit"), then Buyer
may, by notice to Seller, require Seller in such Transaction, at Seller's option, to transfer to
Buyer cash or additional securities reasonably acceptable to Buyer ("Additional Purchased
Securities"), so that the cash and aggregate Market Value of the Purchased Securities, including
any such Additional Purchased Securities, will thereupon equal or exceed such aggregate Buyer's
Margin Amount (decreased by the amount of any Margin Deficit as of such date arising from
any Transactions in which such Buyer is acting as Seiler).
(b) If at any time the aggregate Market Value of all Purchased Securities
subject to all Transactions in which a particular party hereto is acting as Seller exceeds the
aggregate Seller's Margin Amount for all such Transactions at such time (a "Margin Excess"),
then Seller may, by notice to Buyer, require Buyer in such Transactions, at Buyer's option, to
transfer cash or Purchased Securities to Seller, so that the aggregate Market Value of the
Purchased Securities, after deduction of any such cash or any Purchased Securities so
transferred, will thereupon not exceed such aggregate Seller's Margin Amount (increased by the
amount of any Margin Excess as of such date arising from any Transactions in which such Seller
is acting as Buyer).
(c) Any cash transferred pursuant to this Section shall be attributed to such
Transactions as shall be agreed upon by Buyer and Seller.
(d) Seller and Buyer may agree, with respect to any or all Transactions
hereunder, that the respective rights of Buyer or Seller (or both) under subparagraphs (a) and
(b) of this Paragraph may be exercised only where a Margin Deficit of Margin Excess exceeds
a specified dollar amount or a specified percentage of the Repurchase Price for such
Transactions (which amount or percentage shall be agreed to by Buyer and Seller prior to
entering into any such Transactions).
(e) Seller and Buyer may agree, with respect to any or all Transactions
hereunder, that the respective rights of Buyer and Seller under subparagraphs (a) and (b) of this
Section to require the elimination of a Margin Deficit or a Margin Excess, as the case may be,
may be exercised whenever such a Margin Deficit or Margin Excess exists with respect to any --
'�LW:pj(Bf31W/IIMI 4
drtc-:, lt: crill taus avuaas. auvusurr. sraa 7V 86uy54 1'Ullbi!11D
single Transaction hereunder (calculated without regard to any other Transaction outstanding
under this Agreement),
Section 5: Incomt Payments. Where a particular Transaction's term extends over
an Income Payment date on the Securities, subject to that Transaction, Buyer shall, as the parties
may agree with respect to such Transaction (or, in the absence of any agreement, as Buyer shall
reasonably determine in its discretion), on the date such Income is payable either (i) transfer to
or credit to the account of Seiler an amount equal to such Income Payment or Payments with
respect to any Purchased Securities subject to such Transaction; or (ii) apply the Income
Payment or Payments to reduce the amount to be transferred to Buyer by Seller upon termination
of the Transaction. Buyer shall not be obligated to take any action pursuant to the preceding
sentence to the extent that such action would result In the creation of a Margin Deficit, unless
prior thereto or simultaneously therewith Seller transfers to Buyer cash or Additional Purchased
Securities sufficient to eliminate such Margin Deficit.
Section 6: &=e ntylntezesl. Although the parties intend that all Transactions
hereunder be sales and purchases and not loans, in the event any such Transactions are deemed
to be loans, Seller shall be deemed to have pledged to Buyer, as security for the performance
by Seller of its obligations under each such Transaction, and shall be deemed to have granted
to Buyer a security interest in, all of the Purchased Securities with respect to all Transactions
hereunder and all proceeds thereof.
Section 7; Pavmenl and Transfer. Unless otherwise mutually agreed,all transfers
of funds hereunder shall be immediately available funds. All Securities transferred by one party
hereto to the other party (i) shall be in suitable form for transfer or shall be accompanied by
duly executed instruments of transfer or assignment in blank and such other documentation as
the party receiving possession may reasonably request; (ii) shall be transferred on the book-entry
system of a Federal Reserve Bank; or (iii) shall be transferred by any other method mutually
acceptable to Seller and Buyer. As used herein with respect to Securities, "transfer" is intended
to have the same meaning as when used in Section 5313 of the California Uniform Commercial
Code, or, where applicable, in any Federal Regulation governing transfers of the Securities.
Sedan g: SeRre ation of Purchased Securities. To the extent required by
applicable law, all Purchased Securities in the possession of Seller shall be segregated from other
securities in its possession and shall be identified as subject to this Agreement. Segregation may
he accomplished by appropriate identification on the books and records of the holder, including
a financial intermediary or a clearing corporation. Tide to all Purchased Securities shall pass
to Buyer, and unless otherwise agreed by Buyer and Seller, nothing in this Agreement shall
preclude Buyer from engaging in repurchase transactions with Purchased Securities or otherwise
pledging or hypothecating the Purchased Securities, but no such transaction shall relieve Buyer
of its obligations to transfer Purchased Securities to Seller pursuant to Sections 3, 4 or 11
hereof, or of Buyer's obligation to credit or pay Income to, or apply Income to the obligations
of, Seller pursuant to Section 5 hereof.
riw:sirotAmm�r 5
w-:cyo ut4aau rau51 auuaaa, autroaurr, araA iG ae[�l164 tlIUI/Ulf
1
Section 9: Substitutions.
(a) If Buyer consents to the substitution of Purchased Securities, such
substituted securities shall consist of U.S. Treasury Bills, or those securities as authorized by
law and as identified by Buyer, with the same or better credit quality than the original securities
being held,and the Seller shall absorb all costs associated with accomplishing such substitutions.
(b) Seller is not permitted to substitute other securities for those subject to this
Agreement, and therefore must keep Buyer's securities segregated at all times, unless in this
Agreement Buyer grants Seller the right to substitute other securities. If Buyer grants the right
to substitute, this means that Buyer's securities will likely be commingled with Seller's own
securities during the trading day. Buyer is advised that, during any trading day that Buyer's
securities are commingled with Seller's securities, they will be subject to liens granted by Seller
to its Clearing Bank and may be used by Seller for deliveries on other securities transactions.
whenever the securities are commingled, Seller's ability to resegregate substitute securities for
Buyer will be subject to Seller's ability to satisfy the clearing lien or to obtain substitute
securities.
Section I : Reoresenredons. Each of Buyer and Seller represents and warrants to
the other that (i) it is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement, to enter into the
Transactions contemplated hereunder and to perform its obligations hereunder and has taken all
necessary action to authorize such execution, delivery and performance; (ii) it will engage in
such Transactions as principal (or, if agreed in writing, in advance of any Transaction by the l
other party hereto, as agent for a disclosed principal; (iii) the person signing this Agreement on
its behalf is duly authorized to do so on its behalf(or on behalf of any such disclosed principal);
(iv) it has obtained all authorizations of any governmental body required in connection with this
Agreement and the Transactions hereunder, and such authorizations are in full force and effect;
and (v) the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the Transactions
hereunder will not violate any law, ordinance, charter, by-law or rule applicable to it or any
agreement by which it is bound or by which any of its assets are affected. On the Purchase Date
for any Transaction, Buyer and Seller shall each be deemed to repeat all the foregoing
representations made by it.
Section 11: Events of Default. In the event that (i) Seller fails to repurchase or
Buyer fails to transfer Purchased Securities upon the applicable Repurchase Date; (ii) Seller or
Buyer fails, after one business day's notice, to comply with Section 4 hereof; (iii) Buyer fails
to comply with Section 5 hereof; (iv) an Act of Insolvency occurs with respect to Seller or
Buyer; (v)any representation made by Seller or Buyer shall have been incorrect or untrue in any
material respect when made or repeated or deemed to have been made or repeated; or(vi) Seller
or Buyer shall adroit to the other its inability to, or its Intention not to, perform any of its
obligations hereunder (each an "Event of Default"):
(a) At the option of the nondefaulting party, exercised by written notice to the
defaulting party (which option shall be deemed to have been exercised, even if no notice is
rtw.pjm55LM+m
U,1-lc-:i 1L:4Chfit :t4idl fVU:_C, r?VvuaU'rr, arhh iv UUM4 ruuGrultl
..� given, immediately upon the occurrence of an Act of Insolvency), the Repurchase Dare for each
Transaction hereunder shall be deemed immediately to occur.
(b) In all Transactions in which the defaulting party is acting as Seller, if the
nondefaulting parry exercised or is deemed to have exercised the option referred to in
subparagraph (a) of this Section, (i) the defaulting party's obligations hereunder to repurchase
all Purchased Securities in such Transactions shall thereupon become immediately due and
payable; (ii)to the extent permitted by applicable law, the Repurchase Price with respect to each
such Transaction shall be increased by the aggregate amount obtained by daily application of(x)
the greater of the Pricing Rate for such Transaction or the Prime Rate to (y) the Repurchase
Price for such Transaction as of the Repurchase Date as determined pursuant to subparagraph
(a) of this Section (decreased as of any day by (A) any amounts retained by the nondefaulting
party with respect to such Repurchase Price pursuant to clause (iii) of this subparagraph; (B) any
proceeds from the sale of Purchased .Securities pursuant to subparagraph (d)(i) of this Section;
and (C)any amounts credited to the account of the defaulting party pursuant to subparagraph (e)
of this Section, on a 360-day per year basis for the actual number of days daring the period from
and including the date of the Event of Default giving rise to such option to but excluding the
date of payment of the Repurchase Price as so increased; (iii)all Income Paid after such exercise
or deemed exercise shall be retained by the nundefaulting party and applied to the aggregate
unpaid Repurchase Prices owed by the defaulting party; and (iv) the defaulting party shall
immediately deliver to the nondefaulting party any Purchased Securities subject to such
Transactions then in the defaulting parry's possession.
(c) In all Transactions in which the defaulting party is acting as Buyer, upon
tender by the nondefaulting parry of payment of the aggregate Repurchase Prices for all such
'Transactions, the defaulting Party's right, title and interest in all Purchased Securities subject
to such Transactions shall be deemed transferred to the nondefaulting party, and the defaulting
party shall deliver all such Purchased Securities to the nondefaulting party.
(d) After one business day's notice to the defaulting party (which notice need
not be given if an Act of Insolvency shall have occurred, and which may be the notice given
under subparagraph (a)of this Section or the notice referred to in clause (ii) of the first sentence
of this Section, the nondefaulting party may:
(i) as to Transactions in which the defaulting party is acting as Seller,
(A)immediately sell, in a recognized market at such price or prices as the nondefaulting
parry may reasonably deem satisfactory, any or all Purchased Securities subject to such
Transactions and apply the proceeds thereof to the aggregate unpaid Repurchase Prices
and any other amounts owing by the defaulting party hereunder, or (B) in its sole
discretion elect, in lieu of selling all or a portion of such Purchased Securities, to give
the defaulting party credit for such Purchased Securities in an amount equal to the price
therefor on such date, obtained from a generally recognizrd source or the most recent
closing bid quotation from such a source, against the aggregate unpaid Repurchase Prices
and any other amounts owing by the defaulting party hereunder; and
nw:saa1900/t1ri3 7
U]-14-SJ {{:4v and rnti6 nuuLnn, (wvusurr, Aran 1'd YoLJnQ ruu.: Ar'!
(ii) As to Transactions in which the defaulting party is acting as Buyer,
(A) purchase securities ("Replacement Securities") of the same class and amount as any
Purchased Securities that are not delivered by the defaulting party to the nondefaulting
party as required hereunder, or (B) in its sole discretion elect, in lieu of purchasing
Replacement Securities, to be deemed to have purchased Replacement Securities at the
price therefor on such date, obtained from a generally-recognized source or the most
recent closing bid quotation from such a source.
(a) As to Transactions in which the defaulting party is acting as Buyer, the
defaulting party shall be liable to the nondefaulting party (i) with respect to Purchased Securities
(other than Additional Purchased Securities), for any excess of the price paid (or deemed paid)
by the nondefaulting party for Replacement Securities therefor over the Purchase Price for such
Purchased Securities; and (ii) with respect to Additional Purchased Securities, for the price paid
(or deemed paid) by the nondefaulting party for the Replacement Securities therefor. In
addition, the defaulting party shall be liable to the nondefaulting party for interest on such
remaining liability with respect to each such purchase (or deemed purchase) of Replacement
Securities from the date of such purchase (or deemed purchase) until paid in full by Buyer.
Such interest shall be at a rate equal to the greater of the Pricing Rate for such transaction or
the Price Rate.
(f) For purposes of this Section 11, the Repurchase Price for each Transaction
hereunder in respect of which the defaulting party is acting as Buyer shalt not increase above
the amount of such Repurchase Price for such Transaction determined as of the date of the
exercise or deemed exercise by the nondefaulting party of its option under subparagraph (a) of
this Section.
(g) The defaulting party shall be liable to the nondefaulting party for the
amount of all reasonable legal or other expense incurred by the nondefaulting patty in connection
with or as a consequence of an Event of Default, together with interest thereon at a rate equal
to the greater of the Pricing Rate for the relevant Transaction or the Prime Rate.
(h) The nondefaulting patty shall have, in addition to its rights hereunder, any
rights otherwise available to it under any other agreement or applicable law.
Section 2: Single Agreement. Buyer and Seller acknowledge that,and have entered
hereunto, and will enter into each Transaction hereunder in consideration of and in reliance upon
the fact that, all Transactions hereunder constitute a single business and contractual relationship
and have been made in consideration of each other. Accordingly, each of Buyer and Seller
agrees (i) to perform all of its obligations in respect of each Transaction hereunder, and that a
default in the performance of any such obligations shall constitute a default by it in respect of
all Transactions hereunder; (ii) that each of them shall be entitled to set off claims and apply
property held by them in respect of Transaction against obligations owing to them in respect of
any other Transactions hereunder; and (iii) that payments, deliveries and other transfers made
by either of them in respect of any Transaction shall be deemed to have been made in
nw:�tess�n�ror 8 �"/
uJ'tt'Y] 11::ons: rays, aVuanz, Wuvu:urr, uan ,a y,t,tY7s ru:wtu
i
1 consideration of payments, deliveries and other transfers in respect of any other Transactions
hereunder, and the obligations to malce any such payments, deliveries and other transfers may
be applied against each other and netted.
Section 13: Notices and Other Communications. Unless another address is
specified in writing by the respective patty to whom any notice or other communication is to he
given hereunder, all such notices or communications shall be in writing or confirmed in writing
and delivered at the respective addresses set forth in Annex If, attached hereto.
Section 14: Entire Agreement: Severabilily. This Agreement shall supersede any
existing agreements between the parties containing general terms and conditions for repurchase
transactions. Each provision and agreement herein shall be treated as separate and independent
from any other provision or agreement herein and shall be enforceable, notwithstanding the
unenforeeability of any such other provision or agreement.
Section15: NQn--Assienahility: Termination. The rights and obligations of the
parties under this Agreement and under any Transaction shall not be assigned by either party
without the prior written consent of the other parry. Subject to the foregoing, this Agreement
and any Transactions shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit ur the parties and their
respective successors and assigns. This Agreement may be cancelled by either party upon giving
written notice to the other, except that this Agreement shall, notwithstanding such notice, remain
applicable to any Transactions then outstanding.
Section I : Governing law. This Agreement shall be governed by the law of the
State of California, without giving effect to the conflict of law principles thereof.
Section 17: No Waivers, Etc. No express or implied waiver of any Event of Default
by either party shall constitute a waiver of any other Event of Default and no exercise of any
remedy hereunder by any parry shall constitute a waiver of its right to exercise any other remedy
hereunder. No modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement and no consent by
any party to a departure herefrom shall be effective unless and until such shall be in writing and
duly executed by both of the parties hereto. Without limitation on any of the foregoing, the
failure to give a notice pursuant to subparagraphs 4(a) or 4(b)hereof will not constitute a waiver
of any right to do so at a later date.
Section IS. Use of Emylovee Plan Assets.
(a) If assets of an employee benefit plan subject to any provision of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of I R74 ("ERISA") are intended to be used by either
party hereto (the "Plan Party") in a Transaction, the Plan Party shall so notify the other parry
prior to the Transaction. The Plan Party shall represent in writing to the other party that the
Transaction does not constitute a prohibited transaction under ERISA or is otherwise exempt
therefrom, and the other party may proceed in reliance thereon but shall not be required so to
proceed.
nw:rrt'tstavtt,m 9
W'r C'dJ IGieau rava ruu6La, "vv'Jaurr, Jrar. 1v d04Jd3i rJw u:i
(b) Subject to the last sentence of subparagraph (a) of this Section, any such
Transaction shall proceed only if Seller furnishes or has furnished to Buyer its most recent
available audited statement of its financial condition and its most recent subsequent unaudited
statement of its financial condition.
(c) By entering into a Transaction pursuant to this Section, Seller shall be
deemed (i) to represent to Buyer that since the date of Seller's latest such financial statements.
there has been no material adverse change in Seller's financial condition which Seller has not
disclosed to Buyer; and (ii) to agree to provide Buyer with future audited and unaudited
statements of its financial condition as they are issued, so long as it is a Seller in any outstanding
Transaction involving a Plan Party.
Section 19: Itn=,
(a) The parties recognize that each Transaction is a "repurchase agreement"
as that term is defined in Section 101 of Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended (except
insofar as the type of Securities subject to such Transaction or the term of such Transaction
would render such definition inapplicable), and a "securities contract" as that term is defined in
Section 741 of Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended.
(b) It is understood that either party's right to liquidate securities delivered to
it in connection with Transactions hereunder or to exercise any other remedies pursuant to
Paragraph 11 hereof, is a contractual right to liquidate such Transaction as described in Sections
555 and 559 of Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended.
Section 20: Disclosure Relating to Certain Federal Protccdotm, The parties
acknowledge that they have been advised that:
(a) In the case of Transactions in which one of the parties is a broker or dealer
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") under Section 15 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("1934 Act"), the Securities Investor.Protection Corporation
has taken the position that the provisions of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970
("SIPA") do not protect the other party with respect to any Transaction hereunder,
(b) In the case of Transactions in which one of the parties is a government
securities broker or a government securities dealer registered with the SEC under Section 15C
of the 1934 Act, SIPA will not provide protection to the other party with respect to any
Transaction hereunder; and
(c) In the case of Transactions in which one of the parties is a financial
institution, funds held by the financial institution pursuant to a Transaction hereunder are not a
deposit and therefore are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corpnration, the Federal
Savings & Loan Insurance Corporation or the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund, as
applicable.
nwgjl s"11l.sa 10
04-14-$4 i1:40M faux auuiaf„ aVVLaurr, oraA /V 0043034
Section 21: Governing Lbw. The laws of the State of California govern all
transactions pursuant to this Agreement. The parties acknowledge that all Purchased Securities
shall be lawful for the purpose of govemmental investment by the Buyer and shall be limited as
described in Section 22 below. Because Buyer is a governmental entity and is prohibited by
applicable law from making loans, the panics hereby (i) agree that all transactions conducted
pursuant to this Agreement must be interpreted as purchases and sales of securities; and (ii)
expressly reconfirm the provisions of Section 6 of the Agreement.
Scoligp..22: Permissible Purchased Securities. Only those investments, as described
in California Government Code Section 53601, may be Purchased Securities pursuant to this
Agreement.
Section 23: Seller's Financial Condition.
(a) Seller shall maintain compliance with applicable federal regulatory
standards and guidelines regarding capital adequacy and net capitalization.
(b) Any transaction undertaken pursuant to this Agreement shall proceed only
if Seller furnishes or has furnished to Buyer its most oxen available audited statement of
financial condition and its most recent subsequent unaudited statements of financial condition.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Seller fails to furnish its most recent audited and/or
unaudited financial statements, the Buyer shall provide written notice to the Seller of such
failure, and the Seller must provide the appropriate financial statements within thirty (30)
calendar days of receipt of such notice.
(e) By entering into a transaction pursuant to this Agreement, Seller shall be
deemed to represent to Buyer that since the date of Seller's latest financial statements, there has
been no material adverse change in Seller's financial condition which Seller has not disclosed
in writing to Buyer, and Seller further agrees to provide Buyer with future audited and unaudited
statements of financial condition as they are issued.
Section-24: pgliverv. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7, all transactions
shall be accomplished through "delivery vs. payment", unless the parties otherwise agree prior
to the transfer of funds.
Section 25: Milgrgin Ratios. Unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties to the
transaction, for purposes of calculating the margin amount, the following ratios shall be applied
daily to the market value of Purchased Securities, depending on their maturity:
Maturity of U.S. Agency
Purchased U.S. Treasury Discount and
Securities Securities Coupon Securities
1 - 5 years 102% 102%
rvw,glnsswrntro) 11
9J'!L"JJ 11,4Jxm rnva auu:nn, nucurtur r. ,rn; i,� y0[.ty�4 Ie:J/Uifl �.
i
section 6: Margin Maintenance. For term repurchase agreements, a custodian
of the Seller shall maintain the required margin amount, or the required margin ratios shall be
increased as mutually agreed in writing to compensate for possible market price losses or gains.
If the dealer does not mark daily, the margin ratios shall be increased.
Section 27; Authorized Personnel. Only those persons identified below may
execute transactions pursuant to this Agreement. These signatories are those who are legally
authorized to sign by Resolution of the appropriate governing body or by corporate Ordinance.
Section 28: Conflict. In the event of a conflict between this Master Repurchase
Agreement and Annex I or Annex 11, the Annex shall prevail over the inconsistent portion of
the Master Repurchase Agreement. In the event of a conflict between Annex I and Annex II,
Annex I shall prevail.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. I OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, for itself and on behalf of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and Id of Orange
County, California
By
I. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
By
Districts' Tr=urer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
THOMAS L. WOODRUFF
DISTRICT COUNSEL
By
MERRILL LYNCH GOVERNMENT SECURITIES, INC.
By
Its
By
Its
nw:nm+»vnvn 12
AUVAAC. VVVL'L jr,. Jr la LV y04J70q tMiV10
7
l�
w1P`
ANNEX I
SUPPLEMENTAL PROVMONS
TO MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT
THESE SUPPLEMENTAL PROVISIONS TO MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT
are made and entered into, to be effective this _ day of , 1993, by and
between:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, Wilornia,
hereinafter referred to as "Buyer";
AND
MERRILL LYNCH GOVERNMENT SECURITIES INC., hereinafter
referred to as "Seller".
WITNESSETH;
The parties hereto agree that, notwithstanding any prior agreements between them, the
following terms and conditions shall govern all transactions hereafter entered into between them
in which one party ("Seller') agrees to transfer to the other ("Buyer") securities or financial
instruments ("Securities")against the transfer of funds by Buyer, with a simultaneous agreement
by Buyer to transfer to Seller such Securities at a date certain or on demand, against the transfer
of funds by Seller (each such transaction referred to herein as a "Transaction"):
Section 1: Disclosure Relatine to Certain Federal Protections. The parties
acknowledge that they have been advised that:
(a) In the case of Transactions in which one of the parties is a broker or dealer
registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") under Section 15 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("1934 Act"), the Securities Investor Protection Corporation
has taken the position that the provisions of the Securities Invcstur Protection Act of 1970
("SIPA") do not protect the other party with respect to any transaction hereunder;
(b) In the case of Transactions in which one of the parties is a government
securities broker or a government securities dealer registered with the SEC under Section 15C
of the 1934 Act, SIPA will not provide protection to the other party with respect to any
Transaction hereunder; and
rLW:OI(a5!)Oltlgi 1
UJ-IL-DJ IIYVt.� tAvr :vviuA, nvwAv::, J(An wAUAJOJ� �._. ..,,
(c) In the case of Transactions in which one of the parties is a financial
institution, funds held by the financial institution pursuant to a Transaction hereunder are not a
deposit and therefore are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal
Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation or the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund,
as applicable.
Section 2: Transfer. As used herein, and in any prior agreement between the
parties with respect to Transactions hereunder, "transfer" is intended to have the same meaning
as when used in Section 8313 of the California Uniform Commercial Code, or where applicable,
in any federal regulation governing transfer of the Securities.
Section 3: Stg "m anon. Seller shall be required to segregate purchased
Securities in its possession from other securities in its possession and to identify such Purchased
Securities as subject to this Agreement(and any prim agreement between the parties with respect
to any Transactions hereunder), solely to the extent that such segregation and identification are
required by applicable law or to effect validly a transfer hereunder.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, for itself and on behalf of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, and to of Orange County, California
By_.
I. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
By
Districts' Treasurer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
TROMAS L. WOODRUFF
DISTRICT COUNSEL
By
MERRILL LYNCH GOVERNMENT SECURITIES INC.
By
its
By
Iu
. Vu ♦/� w'•I t!•fJ114 •euw ,., .mu✓YJuw,.tl •J •IVLJJJt 1VlV/ VIV
i
ANNEX II
NAMES AND ADDRESSES FOR COMMUNICATIONS
BETWEEN PARTIES
For; County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California
108" Ellis Avenue
Post Office Box 8127
Fountain Valley, Ca. 92728-8127
Attn.:
For: Merrill Lynch Government Securities Inc.
World Financial Center - North Tower
New York, New York 10281-11308
Atm.:
TL1V:Plt���11W
( i
March 11, 1993
18-MONTH PROGRAM PERFORMANCE
ASSUMPTIONS
DATE ACTION ISSUE COUPON/MATURITY PRICE
9/3/91 PURCHASE $50 MILLION TREASURY 7.25 8/31/96 100.00%
9/3/91 REV REPO $50 MILLON TREASURY 7.25 8/31/96 5.65%
ANALYSIS
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F)
QUARTER CSDOC CSDOC PROFIT CSDOC
ENDING TREA COUPON REV REPO REV REPO THIS CUMULATIVE
DATE EARNINGS RATE PAID INT EXPENSE QUARTER PROFIT
(B-D)
11/30/91 $876,373.63 5.65 $685,376.39 $190,997.24 $190,997.24
02/29/92 $906,250.00 4.80 $602,116.67 $304,133.33 $495,130.57
05/31/92 $906,250.00 4.10 $519,959.72 $386,290.28 $881,420.85
08/31/92 $906,250.00 3.90 $494,595.83 $411,654.17 $1,293,075.02
11/30/92 $911,256.90 3.40 $426,499.31 $484,757.59 $1,777,832.61
02/28/93 $901,243.09 3.45 $428,015.63 $473,227.47 $2,251,060.08
05/31/93 $906,250.00 3.30 $418,504.17 $487,745.83 $2,738,805.90
KRCAMDOCS\FMMTG\PEV .CHT
KPMG- Peat Marwick
cenified Public Accountants
Orange County Office Telephone 714 850 4300 Telelac 714 85D 4488
Center Tower
650 Town Center Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
March 10, 1993
Ms.Patricia Gorczyca
Orange County Sanitation Districts
P.O. Box 8127
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
Dear Patti:
It was a pleasure meeting with you, Gary Stteed and Dan Dillon last week to discuss your
proposed new investment policy.
As you have recognized, an important aspect of implementing the policy is providing
appropriate internal controls over investment transactions to reduce the risk of losses of
public funds. Some of the key internal control elements,which should be documented in a
formal written policy,include:
• Control of collusion
• Separation of dudes
• Separating transaction authority from accounting and recordkeeping
• Custodial safekeeping
• Clear designation of authority
• Written confirmation of telephone transactions
• Minimizing the number of authorized investment officials
• Documentation of transactions and strategies
• Review of contracts and agreements by legal counsel
I have enclosed for your reference a copy of the"Investment Portfolio Guidelines"used by
the City of Orange. The sections on evaluating and authorizing institutions, telephone wire
transfers and safekeeping should be of particular interest.
KPMG Peat Marwick
Ms.Patricia Gorcryca
March 10, 1993
Page 2
I have also enclosed a sample"Legal Investment Report"farm. A form such as this should
be completed for each investment to ensure that the investment is suitable under the
Districts' investment policy and applicable laws. The form should be approved by the
investment manager prior to initiating any investment transactions.
I hope this information is helpful. Please call me if you have any questions of if I can be of
further assistance.
Very mdy yours,
KPMG PEAT MARWICK
Steven L. Sardegna
Senior Manager
SLS:gv
Enc.
- COUNTY SANITATION DImius
d of ORANGE COUNTY. CAOFORNIA
108 A ews Av Nue
PO BOX W27
March 10, 1993 r WCN VALar.c MRNiA 9272"127
tf
STAFF REPORT
Self-Funded Health Plan Overview
During a recent review of the Self-Funded Health Plan budget and costs, the
Committee asked staff for additional information. The Directors expressed concern
over the rate of expenditures compared to the budget and what cost containment
practices were in effect.
The budget recommended by staff and approved by the Boards for 1992-93 was
for a total of $1,577,000 for self-funded medical and dental claims. This
recommendation was a decrease from the 1991-92 budget amount of
$2,031,000. The claims reduction experienced during the three quarters prior to
the budget preparation that caused us to (ewer our 1992-93 projection was
attributed to changes in the mix of employees in the fund, increased premium co-
payments by employees, and other cost containment measures. However, we
now know that a substantial amount of fourth quarter claims caused the budget
recommendation for 1992-93 to be too low. Use of 12-month data for the
1991-92 costs have resulted in a recommended budget of $2,077,000, an
increase of $500,000. Had this been the adopted budget, costs for the first six
months of 1992-93 would be 61 % of the budget allocation.
The Districts offer two prepaid health maintenance organization (HMO) health
insurance plans also. Of the current 610 employees and retirees insured, 199 are
covered by an HMO and 411 participate in the self-funded plan. About half of
those in the self-funded plan are individuals only, from whom no premium is
collected. Two-party and family coverages require a premium contribution from
the employee approximately equal to their premium for HMO coverage.
The Districts utilize the services of Association Administrators and Consultants
(AA&C) for third-party administration of the indemnity health coverage. The
Districts' self-funded group health plan is backed up by stop loss coverage with
Anthem Life Insurance Company. There is a specific cap of $75,000 per claim, an
annual aggregate cap of approximately $3,000,000, and a stop loss maximum
reimbursement of $1 ,000,000.
r '
U
Self-Funded Health Plan Overview
Page 2
March 10, 1993
As a part of this program, the Districts offer the American Health Network of
Preferred Provider Organizations (PPO). Employees are encouraged to utilize both
PPO physicians and hospitals in the plan by waiving the medical care deductible for
all charges from a PPO provider and by paying 90% of the covered charge, rather
than 80%. Utilization management analysis is now performed by Anthem Health
Systems, Incorporated, in association with the PPO network. Their services
include preadmission screening, continued stay review, discharge planning, various
review procedures, and ongoing case management. As a result of this intensive
process, PPO utilization has increased from 49% to 62% in the last year, and the
average hospital stay has decreased from 4.8 to 3.9 days. AA&C also performs
case management activities with regard to both hospital charges and injuries or
illnesses resulting in multiple treatment expenses.
Prescription drug coverage is now provided through Pharmaceutical Card System,
with the employee paying $7 for each generic prescription, and $10 for brand-
name prescriptions. The Districts are billed at wholesale cost for the balance, plus
an administrative fee. This program appears to be cutting our prescription related
costs approximately 10%.
For the first six months, the cost for full family coverage under the indemnity
program is approximately $850 per month. Effective July 1, 1993, the employees'
share of this cost will be $160.00. Employees who have HMO coverage with
Kaiser will pay about $149 per month, and those with FHP will pay about $163.
The long-term intent is to encourage participation in HMO plans, as they represent
a less costly benefit. Annual increases in employee contribution rates were
negotiated for the first time in 1990 in pursuit of that goal.
Workers' Compensation cases are aggressively managed by a third-party
administrator, Keenan and Associates. Keenan has a cost containment program
that reviews all medical expenses resulting from Workers' Compensation cases.
The audit of such charges resulted in a savings of $16,000 in 1992, which
represented a 22% savings increase over the prior year. In addition, the Districts
have adopted avery aggressive position with regard to the acceptance and
settlement of Workers' Compensation claims.
The Districts also have a proactive safety program designed to reduce the
frequency and severity of accidents. As a result of all of these efforts, our costs
associated with Workers' Compensation claims are a fraction of the amount spent
on a per capita basis by other large sanitation districts.
r
r.. Self-Funded Health Plan Overview
Page 3
March 10, 1993 -
Most health care cost containment initiatives focus on a plan design elements,
including alternate delivery systems, flexible benefits and managed care. Of these,
the Districts are currently utilizing HMO health services and performing managed
care activities through our third-party administrators. With respect to the
remaining area, flexible benefits, we are currently working with our broker-of-
record, Robert F. Driver Company, to determine if it has merit for consideration in
negotiations with employee groups this fall when current MOU's expire.
GGS:lc
REF:CA P00CS%RC.W01SRFPC3.11e
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
Information for:
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
Regarding:
Strategies for Managing a Fixed-to-Floating
Interest Rate Swap Program
March 17, 1993
Merrill Lynch & Co. PaineWebber Incorporated
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
March 17, 1993
Strategies for Managing a Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate Swap Program
Table of Contents
CURRENT OBJECTIVES A
CURRENT MARKET ENVIRONMENT B
INTEREST RATE SWAP MECHANICS C
ADDITIONAL ISSUES D
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION E
H ld H H H [ H H H f F H H H H H fl l � E fl
CURRENT OBJECTIVES
t t( t t t t t t a /� t t t t t t tl F e
CURRENT OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES OF A FIXED-TO-FLOATING
INTEREST RATE SWAP PROGRAM
• Opportunity to Reduce Current Fixed Rate Interest Costs
• Maintain Current Attractive Variable Rate Financing
Program
• Maintain or Strengthen Districts' Credit Rating
• Design a Swap Program Which Can Be Managed in Changing
Interest Rate Environments
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County l
CURRENT MARKET ENVIRONMENT
CURRENT MARKET ENVIRONMENT
TEN YEAR FIXED-TO-FLOATING SWAP RATE
Vs. J.J. KENNY INDEX
(03/08/88 - 03/08/93)
s . . . . . . . . .
s
a6 - - - - - - - -
U
N
a
A
v 4 - --
y
d
a
y
2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - -
w
0
03/08/88 05/02/89 06/26/90 08/20/91 03/08/93
—J.J. Kenny Index 10 Ye1r FXR
Current Interest Rate Environment is Lowest in 16 Years.
County Sanitation Disvicts of Orange County 2
V
CURRENT MARKET ENVIRONMENT
SPREAD BETWEEN TEN YEAR FIXED RECEIVOR
SWAP RATE and J.J. KENNY INDEX
(03/08/88 - 03/08/93)
4 - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . .
s
N
d
N
U
y
N
9
N
y
N I
C1.
W
m
N
A 0 wvv
fx
_1
03/08/88 03/28/89 04/17/90 05/07/91 03/08/93
Current Yield Curve is Historically Steep.
County Sanitarian Districts of Orange County 3
INTEREST RATE SWAP MECHANICS
INTEREST RATE SWAP MECHANICS
BENEFITS OF FIXED-TO-FLOATING
INTEREST RATE SWAP
• Converts a Portion of Fixed Rate Debt to Floating Rate Debt
• Immediate Reduction in Debt Service Provides Lower All-In
Interest Cost
• Swap Program is Easily Implemented with Execution Immediately
Following Approval by Districts
• Ability to Garner Additional Savings with Swap Restructuring or
Reversal
• No Put Risk, Remarketing Fees, or Letter of Credit Associated with
Traditional Floating Rate Debt
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 4
i
INTEREST RATE SWAP MECHANICS
FIXED-TO-FLOATING
INTEREST RATE SWAP STRUCTURE
Fixed Payment (%)
Fixed Receivor Rate
I
CSDOC MERRILL
LYNCH
Variable Payment(%)
d.J. Kenny Index
FIXED RATE
BONDHOLDERS
Country Sanitation Districts of Orange County 5
INTEREST RATE SWAP MECHANICS
INTEREST RATE SWAP PRICING
(FIXED RECEIVOR RATES as of 03/08/9a)
MATURITY FIXED RECEIVOR
YEARS) RATE
1 2.53%
2 2.88%
3 3.23%
5 3.78%
7 4.04%
10 4.28%
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 6
Il I a t I I I I I I Il I t
INTEREST RATE SWAP MECHANICS
FIXED-TO-FLOATING
INTEREST RATE SWAP YIELD CURVE
(Fixed Receivor Rates as of 03/08/93)
5
s
4 . . _ . . . . . . - . .
� [,,,Fixed Receivor Rates
p Profit*
3
2
u" J.J. Kenny as or 03/02/93
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
*Assuming Current JJ Kenny Term of Swap (Years)
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 7
INTEREST RATE SWAP MECHANICS
EXPECTED SAVINGS ON TEN YEAR SWAP
ASSUMED AVG. PRESENT VALUE
OF J.J. KENNY POTENTIAL
OVER 10YEARS PROFIT
1.00% $45,154,956
1.87%(1) 33,177,879
2.00% 31,388,201
2.50% 24,504,824
3.00% 17,621,446
3.50% 10,738,069
4.00% 3,854,691
4.28%(2) 0
4.50% (3,028,686)
(1)Current JJK Index (2)Current 10 Year Fmd Becemor Rate
HISTORY OF SHORT-TERM RATES
(Average J.J. Kenny to March 8, 1993)
01/01/93 to Date: 2.06%
01/01/92 to Date: 2.71%
01/01/91 to Date: 3.51%
01/01/90 to Date: 4.27%
01/01/89 to Date: 4.80%
01/01/88 to Date: 4.91%
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 8
ADDITIONAL ISSUES
C � �
ADDITIONAL ISSUES
RATING AGENCY CONCERNS
• Amount of Variable Rate Debt Outstanding and Associated Floating Rate Exposure
• Final Maturity of Variable Rate Debt
• Ability of Districts to Withstand "Worst Case Scenarios" (i.e. counterparty default,
rising floating rates, etc.)
METHODS OF MITIGATING
RATING AGENCY CONCERNS
• Application of Interest Rate Cap to Currently Outstanding Variable Rate Debt
• Shorten Maturity of Swap
• Base Swap on Smaller Notional Amount
County Sanitation Districts ofOmnge County 9
ADDITIONAL ISSUES
ADDITIONAL INTEREST RATE SWAP
MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES
• Upfront Reversal
- Locks in Guaranteed Profit for Term as Determined by Districts
• Swap Extension
- Benefits Districts in Rising Interest Rate Environment
• Swap Reversal
- Similar to Transaction Implemented in November - Benefits Districts in Falling
Interest Rate Environment
County Sanitation Districts of Omnge County 10
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
RECOMMENDATION
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
• Authorize Merrill Lynch/PaineWebber to Serve as Interest
Rate Swap Bankers
• Direct Staff and Swap Banking Team to Obtain Guidance
from Rating Agencies Regarding Swap Structure and Terms
• Direct Staff to Report Back to Fiscal Policy Committee in
April With Recommended Swap Structure and
Implementation Plan
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 11
( l �
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
Information for:
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
Regarding:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 1990-92 SERIES B
1993 Advance Refunding Analyses
March 17, 1993
I [ I I I C I �" t [ I I I l I � I I
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
Information for:
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
Regarding:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 1990-92 SERIES B
1993 Advance Refunding Analyses
March 17, 1993
l [ [ [ ! t l t t [ l l [ I
SERIES B ADVANCE REFUNDING
STRUCTURING ALTERNATIVES
• Traditional Fixed Rate Advance Refunding
• Inverse Floater Derivative Products
- (To Achieve Additional Interest Savings)
• Synthetic Fixed Rate Advance Refunding
(Similar to 1992 Advance Refunding Structure)
• State Revolving Fund Opportunities
- (Could Apply to Either 2007 or 2016 Term of Series B)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Capital Improvement Program - 1990-92 SERIES B
1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation
Rates as of 03/08/93
TRADITIONAL FIXED RATE ADVANCE REFUNDING STRUCTURE
CURRENT MKT CURRENT MKT
as of 03/08/93 LESS 47 BP
PAR AMOUNT $56,300,000 $58,070,000
GROSS SAVINGS $615,081 $2,501,145
PV SAVINGS % 0.776% 3.000%
ARBITRAGE TIC 5.306% 4.825%
AVG. ANNUAL SAVINGS $26,174 $106,432
E t I I I I E
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Capital Improvement Program - 1990-92 SERIES B
1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation
Rates as of 03/08/93
TRADITIONAL REFUNDING STRUCTURE w/ INVERSE FLOATERS
CURRENT MKT CURRENT MKT
as of 03/08/93 LESS 40 BP
PAR AMOUNT $56,510,000 $58,020,000
GROSS SAVINGS $843,424 $2,466,590
PV SAVINGS % 1.034% 3.000%
ARBITRAGE TIC 5.248% 4.837%
"G. ANNUAL SAVINGS $35,890 $104,961
I I I I I I t l ( ° I I I I I I I I
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Capital Improvement Program - 1990-92 SERIES B
1993 Refunding Certificates of Participation
Rates as of 03/08/93
SYNTHETIC FIXED RATE ADVANCE REFUNDING STRUCTURE
CURRENT MKT CURRENT MKT
as of 03/08/93 LESS 32 BP
PAR AMOUNT $56,855,000 $58,050,000
GROSS SAVINGS $1,215,584 $2,486,206
PV SAVINGS % 1.472% 3.000%
ARBITRAGE TIC 5.153% 4.830%
AVG. ANNUAL SAVINGS $51,727 $105,796
[ [ I a a a [ a a a [ [ a a a a [ [
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
• Direct Staff and Finance Team to Take Necessary Steps to
Proceed with Advance Refunding of Remaining Series B
Obligations
• Direct Staff to Implement Advance Refunding Should
Prevailing Market Rates Achieve 3.00% Target Savings Level
• Direct Staff to Proceed with Most Cost Effective Financing
Structure to Achieve Target Savings Level
• Direct Staff to Report on Status of Market Conditions and
Advance Refunding at Next Fiscal Policy Committee
l l l 1 [ l 1 l [ i l l l [ 1 1 l ` [ 1
RIERRIU.LYNCN6Cll. OKYI) PAGE I
Cumry fumnGOW 4QpeCaury Ttlimrl AOruv RefOf
CImpwvmlPyu�ImOK5aa0 C'rmmlMWb
f%JnK01»)ReOotliif Ce06en Mheeluim
frOelJe l:CmiOietfo llhe
fOWCFbIUbYGifUHDe REi DINGCA MMWINigI M)fl
fvnm OseaJq ilm�Fs. Tdtl
Cavuy NOm oiOYye Cfm�g
WAmwrt UYPp]0 n 1 o 0 sln.
fnnO.e sw. OnpwamvPe/wpq».hpC
ilsil®oflel Demur e 1 sssAOoceeOow M�
Aarown o e I e
aJmtl»I lh. AW lAA— 0 e 1 e ,9f Re0vW1. Mimi
RbvM l»I�—I R-6n, 0 0 0 CN 61e P»MI
0.ebWI»I0.mreiW BWne: 41Rj11 01 131Y11 GORve IU00m4
TOW. w4w7l p 1 M.W7.
TaW hAwmI ReOUWd'. Ulpnp00
1 I»f F—I pJIWf
%T.eim�J. MU»f
ue I
I Pmw OmJbR<evWy4VA. 41A,f]I
RNMyEuwDepeb. P4nlns P I s)Y)U»
C.aspe4 Moll; I SPAT
lailmw. npeP e I IPPP
Dmo•RofAmvGeRvai. 0 • I 0
DdifmJaRm�e AymO. YVil f I xw I"111
`nve ehemue. n 0 I 3)I0
-
RawMf ;Ttl e I 11n SAYING6MULYUf
Tmtl We ygAj11 P I f1e.1W11 ^
- OmNRMIfr fuse%
TMUw Swy Wiwi
Td i,—VJut Awys W00/Ib
gnm'e Fwtl MluYmmi 0
Nn Tatl Peml VJie Swya � {—N,W
DNAN[MG DATES
iV Swede%of Refetlelh Olnpi
0.m Ug09J
pLvnal MIMI
iw Oma. PqN)
Fw R W g1
F. sOmOb Ines. ONDP
Peuu
FINANCMG INWR Mll -
A Tne0mal. f10WN
Ae bTe%IneW: 141M
pn RameFmti f411f)11
I.b0un0u01EFmd 0.flflf
W
l Al IOe�� umle
�le 1()0
1 C 1 1 1 1 L [ I , [ [ l L [ [ [ 1 I
9(E91N11TNLT1•m. o1ABA)
cawT smm Ix,wu aomB�cawr
Cquul l^Y^'®Pag®191U933aie 6
s54J W.W0199I SI 2adR Cw6ow a Rniiryen
3da.Ya x:9afim6vq MM Beniu
Turd NmW I OwuudW S.J056%
swl sael Tad DdrBnlu I u6r aoa IMmw PV
We IWa Yidd Isiee PvrPl loam Odr Sawa Na Amd I Sev+e Swilar F. Snv®
1 -
1 Olgl% 225U% 1250% IOO WO iS.OW ]]6,15J 17I.I13 ))LIA )99.'3) 28.111 09869N 11,115
3 O2A1% 1,151,199 1.714 9 096 11 1100]]
WN191 E.500% 250W4 IMOW ffi,000 1.151.199 I114]99 I.16n.59n 3.191.05) Rp55 09124 (110.779)
1 W m L. q, I,W,g6 091N)6 114902
5 f&01% J]OW JNg1{ IWOW 315.OW I...m I.)D.M ),1]1.9]J 3,19],05) ES,WO 000W (111,0]2)
6 OYDI% I,g m I,M;W6 0863510 ot"
WNI% LfQM JSOINi IWOW AIS.OW I.HI.W6 1,]39.086 ),I TJ.1]) 1,191,0A 2]ABU 081J519 1110,1291
9 02AIA] I,439.099
9 .. , , 1 . O..n3T53 1JI,.pN
].tMi Jn0011 100.0 2 .0 9 IJAM ).1]3.IW 3.9>,053 33,855 OBUd]) IIW.R 5
1
10 GVDIB 1.433. W I , I O]]991 1
11 WUI% 10K 100W I .OW I.03.g1 1.lxW 3.I71.Y I 1.19),W) I.WS 5 106.3151
13 OVOIM1/E], IADd8 07N IM6
13 0&'Ol LEW IIM IWOW )IS.OW IA2],319 1. ;3I3 I16.615 ).19].053 21,118 07 (103.657)
11 OIA00 I164 621 0
7022% 12;Wl
15 OnW14?000 LIM 1M IWOW 330.000 I.4n I.M.631 J.19].OS] 25& 0680W 0d105
16 WA14001 1,113. i IA1J,91 13)As3
Il WAIIA01 1. % 1U IWO NS, W 1 1 3,171,363 I 3910)] 25, p 06,9m (IW.
19 O f 1.,05.3.6 1.403 06)2g1 III,173
19 WR`03W UM UA IWW LbS. W 5,M3. 6A95.W) 6,9^,OS) E6.X 0616W] I )
0 oEAIM 1. g323 I 06W1% 1..
21 WAI11003 lnµ I.BM IW.O 1,E75.000 I.Ib.J_^B S.SBI.)EB 6.81.655 1 6.919,2b 21515 0. , WAS"
23 0 1/lOd 1.2d659 I.Hb59 I wo .5.145
23 W 19µ 1.9M IWW 1,413. W 1, d.65 5.689.659 69 ,)In I 6,921,1A 24n03 0.SW29 (0.7
2 QVOI4 1655 I,W3655 I 05Id91 42
2S 08?01W SOA SON IWW 4.7I0.000 1.03,655 5.803,65 489].)10 I 6.T.Po 2;37o OSWb Ki3s
26 03`0I/1006 91U28 914728 I 0512911 5;)d
27 0S01/2006 S.ISOK S.ISW{ IW000 1.915,OOD M7.M 5.M.. 4991,155 1 4919,WA 35.305 0199663 I37.115
30 Otooino0] w].391 e11,J91 I 0g6150 2],])s
M WAIROd 530'M f30M IOO.OW 1.3W.W0 oot 6,052JW 6,n99.]q I 6.935.000 35,313 O.g11]1 I2;tlN1
IO 0101/11169 Moot Illo$tis'.. 0161918 JS)JJ
JI WAI/'AN SENA s.250% IOO.OW ]$,WO 11"S ]8).0N 1.193.12n I.s2s.zW z4d) 0119381 23.016
3E U1014 )14W5 M.W5 042704 11.U16
31 o2volmW S.2NA S.I10% IW.UW BO,OW 110W5 190.W5 1.500.190 I I.szs.'AD 25,010 012]O±i 122.132
31 0`A@010 101,935 7n955 I 0.4239 2..1
35 0n01/A10 5150% SISO% 100.000 BS.00D ]d.639 10%639 I.SW.910 1 1,5+3,E00 EL'9J 03N7 9 122.46
M 0101/1011 )W,639 MAY) I 0.3d]W .2.1.
31 0&01/2011 SISD% SJSO% IOO,ODJ 9000D 70,639 )95,W9 1,501,219 IS'_S.q] 33.923 0381565 113.]dl
)8 OL01/3013 1W,IB6 )0),186 1 036046 .2..7
N (WI/1W3 51n0% SJ10% IW.OW 95,OW MM.Im.5% l9n,ln6 1,501,)1] I.S25.Np 23Rffi OWSIS 1221.11
1D U 14?01) ms" Boom 0355515 33!.0
11 MIA013 Slb% SlY3% IMWO IW,WO W.SW BW.SA 1,501.195 1,525.20D 3J,OD5 03M121 I21.83.
43 OEAV20H 69).81J 01.871 I o.U]J]] 9.n38
q WA1Qg1 5150% SRUM IOSOW BRA.WD W].nA 8.]e].0]) 9.g5]45 1 9.5I0.200 2J,155 033639 I14,&0
N OEA1MIS 1)],1$0 J11,420 I OJ201W II,NN
15 OVOLM15 Sq0% Sq0% IOO.OW B,S10,00J 2".W0 9,W4.979 9.q;810 1 9,5I I.IW 243W 03olM 14d11
W 00`01 o16 2N9)n 211.91n OMM 1.329
Il Wg14016 AISO% S110% 50000p 8,9A,OW IK918 9.3)1.9]8 9,119.955 1 9,YW,Np ]n.z15 Oz95WD 1.220
I
M.100.OW 441.6NA155 I04,97QJ53 Id,91055 1 IOS.SB51M 615,00I 400.6N1
[ f f 1 1 t [ ( l ( ( [
F9AIR03.LY m&m.. O 3 PME3
Co 9 =U Maol CaWy
CWiW Impwaeev fltgw 199092 Sme B
t541W.00D 19➢)RefudLBCm�fiduefPeluiptlim
Stl1e6Ws3: RNutle6Cdl Snvi¢
91maN
TOM
L106 Pra RQim6e6 h6aW Td Td
1 OM193 SOWN M.m )99,M3 M.M)
2 OMIM 1.5965M I'm.m
m m 5250R 1,591.526 C591.5M 3.197.03
6 OMINS I,S91,SM 1,591.SM
S OMIN5 SAWN I,SW.SM 1.5965M 3.10.033
6 0]p1.96 1.S96.SM 1,596.SM
T OM196 3.fi00N OWNS I,SM,5M 3.197.033
1 OMIM I.MSM 1.m5M
10 OMIM 5M014 I.MSM 1.393.526 1,192.031
11 OMIM 590053 1,596SM 1.591.SM 3.197.053
12 OMIA9 I.MSM 1.591,326
13 OMIA9 6W0% 1.591.5M 1.591.3M 3.197.053
I6 OMIy2000 1.39y5M I}965M
IS 0091/ 6.IWN LM5M 1.SW.SM 3.1W.053
16 ON= 1.WSM 1.591.SM
19 mlV j 6.2M I.518.526 1."I.SM 1.193p3
IB O IV 2 1.M526 1.591,SM
19 0841 O2 6250N 1.92MW 1.3965M 5,321.SM 6,T_2,03
M O2 lI 3 1.4,1M 116111M
21 OM140W 6.60055 31955.OW 1A111M 3A33.IM 6.919.260
22 OYOVMM 1.355.M 1,355,560
23 OMl2 63WN A21%M 1,355.SW 5.M5.W 6921.IM
25 OM1/MOS I=M 1.2M.W
25 O 1 3 6.6WN 6.6MOW 1.220.1M S.M w 6,921,610
M OM122006 1,OP,60 1.021.610
22 O 1V 61M 1.30AW 1.035,6W S.8R,410 6919.9W
21 MMI/ 7 W5.W0 935AW
A OM12W7 610VA 5.015.W0 9M.OW 6.OWOW 6,925.OW
M OM122W1 M16W M16W
31 OMI M01 0.000N 0 M;600 M2 1,525.M0
32 OMI/20W M16W M1."
33 OMll 0000N 0 M16W mm 1}25.m
H OM1/2010 M;6O0 M;6W
35 OM1R010 0.000N 0 M16W MM600 1.525,200
M 0M11M11 762.60U 261600
33 OMI/3011 0.000N 0 M26W M26W 1.S2312W
30 OMI/M12 M16W M16W
N 0M1/M12 000014 0 mw 3616W 1.$25,200
00 OMIM13 7616M 3616W
61 OMI/M1) 000015 0 M1600 7616W 1.525.M0
62 OMIM16 M16W 362,6W
11 OMIIMI6 6000N 2."5.W0 M2. W 1,263,6W 9,510.2W
N OMIIMI5 Mom 523.OM
65 OMIM15 6(XAM 1.665.OW S23,0511 1,91S.050 9,511.IW
65 OMIM16 m..IW M9.IW
63 OMIM16 6WDN 1,9M.W0 M..IW 9,239,IW 9,501,MB
S1,6M,OW 33.9551636 105,515,6M 10.595.616
I t t
MMRJU LY�A M PAM I
C"��a��
cmWID'. '. IPVQM�a
WMOXIMR,Rwamc�orp�
E— [)—D D".
1. lt� F.
I D"'M 0 0 ..t M.I 0. MWI
2 .:m I MIX 1.M:26 .Im
I ODOM 0 I.-MIN 'M . ,.I :::,.
OVOM m MI 09174M
MI MIX 0 :.4A5S3
3 GO'D 41 ::"m :: X 3811157 A"At
=m M5. .M, DID= 1.,W
7 01,01mm IM526 1IM'mm ."U'D 1:3.km
41 MINI SID ON1712 311.1.
9 000 a? ::I'm ;:Mm:,m 0�77 :::t"m
1.MIN
m I" .1�91 LMI�l
MI-, ::=5X a739600 OWN
:2 0 0 IN MIN .92
:3 m :2KI" ::Msm 0=
4 02,04NOOD 0 0 IMIU IMw .1,11%
" = 1.MIN MIX owim 1.091.565
:,6 02,01*001 0 0 MIX IM526
=1 1.02.600 M'. M.261.1m
:98 02,04HOD 0 0 0 :63243L 0
0 0 616011' 0
0 .601. 0
21 .4DD) I&,6X 0
22 OPOn 0 0 0 0.1.
n .:= 0
DD'
7. owl'MI 0 0 0 0 0
11 nm 0 0 0 0 'Us. 0
X m,`H,D6 a a 0 1 12917 1
27 .,,D 04 0
IS =aODS 0 0 9Xt62
0 0 04
OPOI 0 0 0 SO
'"'D 1.;" 0
DUDI't"I 0 a 0
It 010(t] 0 0 0 �61918
0
32 02,01'"'D 0 0 0
33 DIXI 0 04M2
'"D` III"
1. mi"D 0 1 0 o.t5969 0
0 0 m
I, ...:o 0 0 0.1.
m on= 0 0 0
37 m m: 0 0 0 0
IS m:m 2 0 a 0 :Zml 0
39 DADO :2 0 0 0
0 DVOM3 I a 03,151, 0
.1 =:) 0 a 03463
12 m mi. 0 0 0 0 .,3732
,3 =14 G
:, ...5 0. :;m;I
OlV0=5 0 2W
0 0 Ism
0 0 0 03
17 =m 0 0 0
'I'momo I.Otm 26.371.603 W.Min 11.132.391
ca
t t( t t t t t t t �' t t t t t t t t
MEARILLLMCHAM Y1WNl ME
Camry Svtlh4m Lbpi4dOuye CavYy I-47Rl C� A6 WE.
C4+W Ralae�miml Hgvn IF3M1T.SmnB Cimml Mu1u W
tiR0AW019AReF�NryCCtllulsdMlYiptlm
StlWJV I:('am%iMSaw61Y
SdIR &tJ4lYw"w RFNINDIW C.WDIDATE INFO0.N .
swum: Rd d, 6aFRe¢ TaM
Camry4wYvm PWiN ofPuyv Camry
Frt AmmiC 1$0'AAT " I FMpW Capd Mpo�miml WaWY41MIE91.5eiaC
bif®w/Ir Dsmw[ 0 01 0 FII1.f1f,OTCae6meofFuhpOul
Aauu.aswec a o I o
RdsW If911aleeMAemvYAmual e o 1 e %dhvs R<6vd# a910K
0.tleN 1»I flE�ylAvpN ArnYI e o 1 o G4 We'. FROINI
RtleM IMI Re�me MNBNn¢: k1$n1 o I 41AJT GO Wim: IOIROM/
Taalamm 1®ieTl 1R W,]YJII
Tdtl Nt AmaW ReflvWl Ff1,61gDD
IW1R.F. Nil;bxf
%Tuufmal YF34%
I R.Ca .Rafiutlhy COH. k.m7l
ReRamWEaoo.upm: iflpl.MF >E I ssr,reaala
um.mRsp.o: MM)
IFµW o I Ml,ln
comdlumm o I IW,W]
DepmoFAmueONbaL DaW 3 eauv 0.al5®mw: Drywt o
No
I0
9" 0 II .113
R.-W{ µF 1w11a1
annNas AHALrsIs
Trollb Fg1yT m I 162.2tl]11 —_
p RWt , lva
T�. Fx,fllLlaf
TUJReml vYuesmp: s1.sT.990
Rueae Fie Ae��mmn: o
Na TdR Weml VWs3awP: _—_•••sun9M
M"CMODAM
PV Sa.cpa%af0.aERtldW losfl]%
ow MOM
Rlnvet. mm
r Eu� eaolM
am. Bn MADM
Fmt ReLaStl LweL M
YUMuay fLOI/IF
FMANCMO MN0.NATION
NWnFe Tne Nleel 4Mx
A0.NThS MeeD: 4..
19f1 ReweFbvl WT 71
IA r®$aa6: owl
4emurt Nmwmr. OM
A,W: 16.IY
1m19w.;tt2cx s.w Wro9)93
la.ci sNeMIN o:leB.aw.9r o.nq
oV+A mP19.Nm vmm®199n9;s.0 e
W.Waaoo 1%)w6wnc.1a9M�aP.nem1]�9B
si,w1.2 9dm61p0eq 9B.iw
TaJa I aOWMN 183N
9vs1 9BiJ iaJ ms..m I O9p pm Dsmv6 PY
Om 9w Yie10 No PlOspl 0aas OM 9Bvi91 NMA9wa I 9ev® Srin1 Pm Yn�
1 0401M 1.7001t Il%M 100d.O ISA% 677,514 ML,511 69;514 1 199,163 106,749 0988IS2 105,41
3 MD:M I.)s1,B% 1.)H,B95 096<Bl5 1235,074
33.1w
J WDINI 3d0n 30)0% 100.000 MS,000 I.M.B% I1]9,895 1.091)69 J.191,05) IO;MO 0%2111 (1]],1%)
1 0201M 1?%%) 1.)Sa%1 1 0919951 117,135
5 BDIM 2,130", ;l%% IW.000 Ma000 1.)%,%) 1.3,503 J.091.9)a ).191,0] IdA79 09%101 (221.9f0)
6 01.01M 1,)13,%) I.H5.661 097712412 111191
1 0401M )OHMS )WW1 IQ000 NQOd UWA0J I11903 ],WI,Ji] 1 ],191,05) IdA% O.Bs6N3 (124011)
9 02dM 039,60) 1,11903 0916M 1143N
9 (WDIM ].lbl{ JJ%M 100.000 IIS,OOD 1„3)ZM 1,]31,W] J.ON.SW 3.191,033 IOSAN 0.B16353 (111.963
10 OMIIM 1.0);6% 1.9);6% 077A5) 111.%l
11 OWDIM ).LDN )S%IS 1000M 125.0OD I.Inm I1S1,691 J, s0'V,D) 1.191,05) Iat,Nd 0.IM31 (I13.913)
13 0201M 1,)25,086 1,)25,OB6 O)60323 MIMI
IJ WOIM ).1Wt ).)9WS IQ.OQ 1Po,000 1.)13,W6 1.763.086 ).0➢0.1)2 1.197.0I 106,%1 0.113137 111 227
11 Wg14I)OG 1.J14))0 1.)14110 I 0.]3NJ1 MN.21)
IS (DUVIOW 3.990% O9BWS IQOOD N0.000 IA14P0 U041J0 ),d)sN I J.IM,osl IOl.3U 0)01161 (114151)
16 01)0001 I,M11.616 1,301,616 I 0691091 IDl,df
Is M14I/1011 LIMBO llllMl 1000% MOODI.MI1.616 1,)8).616 ;O)5.313 I ).19J,%l 101,(31 0.6]4I3 1I11.
IB OL01/I% 391 2 1, ,id 1,297.764 I 0658916 I%,21721]
19 0! I.. M 4,2114"6 1%0% I, a0 1, 9,70, 5,5I11d 48I5,Po9 1 49033 10.65 ... (I24.933
)
0 mItI0J 12 ],N I 06M19PZM
21 08,0I4( 139DK 1.390% IQ0 1,Po001) 1,107,096 I,601,3% 6,811192 4919.240 Id,14 0613,440 (MAN)
3 0201N 1.111.036 1,111,0% 0 L46.M
13 00014004 LNp{ LNO% 100.000 1,%, O 1 1,m 5,14 % 6.8I7,073 1 6,91,13 OdB mml )
31 OL01/10M I.031. IAIW I 037110 17I.M
2 01,01AM005 If914 I.590B IQOW 1A0 I.M.1% SOKI 6814216 I 691 % IOS,N 03376I 159119 1
% M1AMOG min MIR
I 0.51N13 97,637
2) OWI/1106 16800, 1.6301t 100.000 S.OM.000
, K , 414116 1 6y19.%0 10, % ... (N33)
)
L O101R00) I720 M I 05191" 11,%S
3 %NIRO 1.7M al % IQ000 s.M % 12 4m,?" 6A31.1Po 1 695. d IW, W 0306913 ( 6N)
MI Ol01/NOS A32I 6%)21 I 09% 9 51607
)I OB01/00B I.IM L % IQO% IIaWO 4311 7A31 1,1 {d2 1 1,335,100 IOU% 048))33 (1,,%)
32 OL01/'009 A Gsxm I 0471949 31,39
)) I LOWS 4.180% 1W0 115, % MAO 7AM 1,12;)11 I 1,535,200 I4916 ONWJI (;%))
N MM10
630%6 63atl6 1 0449916 50,M9
]S Q AB%% L9%M 100000 IQW 6 11a911 1,131,711 I 1.533.100 103,428 0439016 13. 1
36 0201mil wjiol 607.1911 I 0.1190% 0
210
)] MIM1 b% 1)5.0 L9 LMJM IOOA00 00 ,t9B d) )1;B% 1.1A'1,)% I I,SiS,IW 10]Id. OA930 IB 11.3111
12 6N,1% 611.)96 o.N%51 19.193
W 0] I/10
]9 011NI4013 1lNI% 4%OM iQ000 I20.OQ 611,1% 171,7% IA19,371 1,313.300 IWAi9 0.39%I1 (1,961)
10 0YOV1013 d1.519 611339 OJIOOW 11,211
11 63 3 MI C3 1J L94 A9%M IQW MO 61 O IPo, 1,sN I 1,13;W) 300 I,S73, IO11W 0.)9W71 (1,116)
N WNIM/1011 6R06) 0..311851 N, W
I1 L9IJ% IQO% 8.10. 0 4A63 9,7M063 91Po123 9,31a3W IdA 0%SWI I1.N0 1
. MMI 435 914 % 0.3%539 W."s
65 IMIS 49110% 1.9I06 IQ0 9,533.000 Os'm 8,9M636 9, Q231 9,511.100 IdF9 0)1618] 6.037
16 M1M16
211,1d 111,104 038033 13,516
O WNI/A16 4.9104 1..9M1% IOOA% t,%0,000 233.Id 9.I83.Id 9A06.3W 9,109,200 101.993 0
330070 IB,aW
I
SB.O]Q%O 15,011,29I 103,031,191 IW.01,291 I05.583.135 3,%1.]45 I,318.9111
. .....
J-
A. 3
"0 WL
1 4
-TI
X
MERR)LLLWCHICO. OIW] P G l
CawrySu1011m�'v MUu0e Cnmry lYJyoW A6wIURa6y.
C%dd Wpw®Yflpgam l%69l,laeB Mlnaribvflvhm
f]6.fI401DIMRmvIMgGti6ale NWhpyn CumIMUYn
]ehGuk I:CmMN6mm!We
SOURCFSLIpFSW WNp3 RENNgNGCANpOAICdfOYM.VbN Y
Ewmv: pe0m®110 6amlflm. Tg
C rySIIYum U oFQu�Ca
FUMeuxt fYJ10PY0 p I I16.f10.Op C%ap Nal0np ofm lswm.EeieC
pn Remun)Id ltammu a o I a s)1)sssamCm NmEme arFtlmR.tim
nmu.eRmtll a o I a
R6uNIW11rvm9A®mllAmu! 0 s I e xarWue ReEVMri 6]9iMt
RMrdIWI FNeyulAaamlAmul 0 s l o CA 0.N. fflNu01
RebaNlWl OermeFUW BJuae: 61)BJ)1 01 AIY,I71 CN Pre: )o]W]16
TW Eavm fS0�11 p I $M W.))1
--- TmIPU MIuml Rellvtld: f]16»,[N
I 199]W�mv Flutl: t9.fl lb)]
%TmurmN. a]vlOw
I puceCrvlNRe6wtiiy C00.. 41AJ)I
Re0uxy Facmr p{ult WlpPot p I I>J.I10.00)
um.,a%Iwm snm o I [am
Ce0 eF0umc lagaoo 0 1 Ippoo
OepdorAavdlwa. 0 0I 0
Rplma Rome Oryup: 4W 01 AI�})1
4uvurePmum: )14 0I IIAll6 ._..........
FmN¢ 4
ml9 01 A)]J OAVMGEANALTEIE
TdY Lb plWJll p I IC0.6pJ11
1�Wxwea. s]am%
Twlarm,s.;�: lea>aa
TW Reaml Vahv Saviy. f5]),6N
Warne FW MjuWmY: 0
NtlTaYfluml VYue Srum'. f]JI6R
PNANC)ROOATES
— VV Sailp a%orRebvWdW Im16X
M1N6 OI919]
Pdavr6 OJ019J
Fw Waa[ OS9191
F.[ter Sflg19l
F.Refw blNuaet pp19]
LY NWuhy OS9V16
FiN.WCOW OR0LA.R1pN
A2iEyvThr Wev[
MNTue Wm[ ]]S9%
19RI Ruart Fw6 HO
09)J%
W%
10WN�gdpa0
0uumv Puvw: O
IA]s]113.
AWy011E
[ L [ [ [ [ fl [ t r [ [ [ l t l [ [ fl
FffAPB.L LYNCB6 W. OS/0891
CaNy ,v D'eP v ,; C 3
S*5, Ni Imsllhapeml9'P9L9vmB
1cwJ.2019➢3 Pafin6vgCanifimrefPWeplim
Bdeble2. 9a6vdi9fkh 9meim
TUY pmW I 04Ya p 3.247M
9miY 9eW . TaW Dep 9m'm I Beq qw f)w.wa PV
Als Ilse Ye Ns P-Wa ]rveu 0.h 9mo Im Amid I Shim Sn Seem zimw
1 CIMI:M 1250% I2NM I60000 45.00D ]RIN "303 767,I84 1 199,2W );0)9 00]IN )1.666
3 %KI191 I.N3,163 I,N),S6) 0961N4 N8.]l0
3 (SWIAS 23M{ 3.SOOl{ Itl1.000 315,000 I,N),16) I..,46) ;16;]35 ).19]A53 N.NB 09)]Hp (113.]99
4 ( AS I,N0,425 1.4NA25 09U))5 144,199
S w05 3,2w, 3,200% law MISAW 1,440425 I1M,425 3,I60AM 3.197A3 M.20) 0wW1 (108.416)
6 .!M 1,".,5 1,435."S 06612M 1a,995
l 060U96 xflMl ).S00% 1Ww Saw 1.41S. 4S 1.721.15 3.161.9% ),191.05) 35.163 OBIMSS (IW,676)
9 O2NIM 1,4MAM 1,4)0810 083NY I38.OM
9 QNIT SW016 SBWN IW.OW )gI,OpD IAMAM IIMAM] ),1611N 1.191,05] 35,)1) Ot03191 (M in)
10 om m 1.425.I10 IA25.IM 0.781879 I)5.N4
11 M:M 40MI6 4WS$ MOOW )1(S W 1.435.IW 1,])5,IM 3,169.N0 I ;W.053 M.7I3 0761"? (IN.107)
12 WN199 1.419A93 1.4148M I 01424W 13;M1
3 pN199 425M 4250% IWAW 325AW 1.41803 I.743A93 3,162.795 1 3.191,W3 34159 6721425 (105.162)
N W014000 IAIIAM 1.411,9M I 0]049M 131,4W
IS 4MOI420W 445 44M% lawMM 1.411AISS 1.731.916 3,10.W3 3.197,03 33.010 ON6M5 (1W,412)
16 m AlW1 I,b 421 1.4 421 0669342 IM.933
Il Q.OVN01 4.wSi 4.dw, IWOW MS,OW I,wA21 I159,421 3.I63.90 3,193A53 33.210 0022" OW.9W)
IS m12W2 I.IK2M x3942% 1 0635552 IM,553
19 WNI/MM 415096 4.1NM IW.WO 4.03,000 ], S,56 5,491,2M 6A8],51) 1 6.=03 34.SW 0619M3 (I0IA76)
m (X2w1f2W1 I.30.Wo I.M." 1 0034" 110,M1
21 WC)4W3 4.9M 4850% IWOW 4,M5w 1.2N,W0 S.M4W0 OJ113w 1 6,919$ M. ONW19 (86.311)
M 0NI12W4 1.1"w 1.10.W9 1 0.57M04 91,951
M Mglc2m, 4.951M 435ft IW.WO 4.05AW 1,193,W9 SAftm 4885.118 1 4931,IM 35,N3 0.5M)5) (0j31)
24 W914W5 I.W)AM I,W3AM 1 0.54W11 14,SW
25 401Nlf2m, 5.OMP S.WfM IWWO 4.1M,W0 I.W3AM 5,M)AM 6,1131,615 1 4MIAM 34.W5 O.SMI66 (546(k)
M a]PoI/2W6 SHAM 9646M 1 0.51&11 A"
27 WNI/10f6 SA 5.I50P IWAW 4,955AW wAM 5.919.6% 6,584.315 I 6,919.M 35,645 0.50)W2 (MASI)
M 02.01I2007 W].w 937.4XRS 04W531 43.134
a Wg1AW] &2w, i.%q6 law s?I1pOp l3l.w (W;016 6A0.133 1 4941AIN N.869 0417149 (24.89])
M OLTI/AIW 701,436 M1.476 1 0.0570 M,M9
21 I410141118 5.254PM SSSOM ]am 9sm 701.46 194476 1.07,953 1 1,525 37.20 0.45311M (I0,9M)
32 W91/NW 09]45 699,245 1 0442255 211,019
33 (XLDI4W9 5.35 M 5.Mm )WWo Kw 09.Ms 1N.245 I,40.4W I 1.52 = 34110 0.4M941 (11.43)
34 OLAI401a 06AM 06AM 1 0410M 31,616
35 (NIMIM10 UMM SHOM M000 95AW 6M,8M 791AM 1.40.615 I 1.525.M )4525 0.4W1W 01,9&4)
M Mimi 04M6 042% 1 0.2987M 21.235
37 01,401m,I SJSO% ll O 100900 law 6w,M6 1Km 1,40,M3 1 1.525, M6W 0.M8535 (12.315)
M 03AI4012 01A21 01.01 1 03701 MA73
39 (1WIM13 fl b SAMM MYOW 105AW 01.621 l%A21 1.Y 243 1 1.52S41M M9M Ol68Wl (12.551)
40 a] IW3 08113 08113 1 0.3940 24526
41 QgV3013 dl 0 LVOM IW.WO 135'm 04113 M]AI3 1,49;M5 I 1,525,3W );3)5 0350297 (14,01)
42 ayOVID14 05,1M 05,1M 1 ONI30 M237
4) IwIM14 "all "WSS Saw 8.10A00 05.1M 11,190136 9.4]44]3 I 9.51011p 33.121 0.33MI3 (14.348)
M W014015 40,929 aIAM 03241M 17.542
45 06M401S S1WM dllOM IWOM O. WAW 4am 9,WBM 9.471,855 1 9311.IW 33$45 031M22 (6,594)
0 MIM16 20,01 2W,433 1 O.W747 S. W
41 IwIM16 S.SMM `L3M% IMWO 8.9J11.000 2W,483 9,2M493 9.410.%5 1 9.5a" 31,235 O M38 2,94
1
M510.0W 49.232,01: 14)4,1Q01: 101.14xo1: 1 1W.515A36 e43A24 sn,m:
a t ( l i e I [ e
MERMLLLTMCNt CO. 0]9N)] GnGEI
fmuy SUYYm Uehie4afQugeCmRy T�ehexul AL Refs.
Cµml lmpormmJ w,&,, IDAOLS fl` B C/ l M I Flame
F1AON,CN 199)ReOovN®Ceu6vnofPuvptin Coml MUW Lu tl BP
OdW41:cmeomso.�mnlxe
SOURCFseuFs oFFlOim RFFlmnwocwolMnrelNFOR]unoN
Smm: Re0m0n0 kSmePz TdY
cwlrcy stlman umm oraMa ca.Rr
Pe.....—. •xn]RPFR n I 1HA»Aoo ommlmwa.aF�IF�lwun.s�c
phvq®®/La+p t 0 0 o 111)S)),WJCnvOob MPumptin�
.mue0lxee[ 0 RGm :" Wed MouOAmuY: 0 11 o o o
Jmo1 xar4KR[MH U914%
RWIPm�MRmmlNgYll 0 0 0 OYOm: aWwl
RtleMIWl Resew FUMBWu-. MW71 01 41]FJ]I wPIce lolW
TmlSavm SS;If,)]1 ]0I wlw?1
Ta Pu.]mw ReOvext wlN
I IP)IPade b IMI
%TdWme4 U.OIOK
Ibu I
I RmwCvnenbRWnnaa COM1: 41]4])I
MefxiJny Fuoo MI.W. )o uT,OM,'M
Nmenim%Faun IN= o I wsAPs
l:aGarluwi¢: IWAT 0 0 0 0 IW.tl
l]yonor.]mmn Wavt
6M SdmRmwRlom: 41RJ]I 0 41]BS]I
WMoem Pmtlun My] 0 Xp)]l
RvuWiq. IH 0 149 SnVM65 NMLT515
TMYUn ]6]IWjll f0 W.19B�1
Oseaw RuelYtl: 4F]Nll
Tm Ooe Sm�V" A.Mb.%0
iW%em1 Vtla Sm®. slouN
IlrMefmtl Mrymm[ 0
NaTaul flav0 VMusmp: FIS)19N
FlNnNCMO Wm
PV 9nvglr%eflsOUNMPv OW)0%
Due MIMI
omreen Osvw]
Fvaaw. 009w)
Fvu ReFeMeONmec .1`16
Ltl MCOmy: 0R9Y16
FIHANCQNMPoRWTION
NtftIl v'. IU69%
nBmThe Wud 19YM
1%]Revry sp Mn
Utlewntlq 6pM 0
WMdellevi®: 0}TM
.Mv{vlilc' 16.IH
l t 1 1 1 1 l l t � ' t l t l
Jw911a;1.VNtHaOD. wN9193
Camp 9meo 3Mrer.o3a�ep Crony
Cybl lvpo�m P�gvo 19P)9{9vr 9
fJ4w4am I99J 9.mtlipG]dr.x9MgYim
Se0e00sY 9<Bemf®Na59mes
Tab6 OmWi i% 463691
SaW Seel T" DaM Sem I OM Um Dsmum PV
9m Vim Pim Fxpl 4amen Pb f W N 1 9nee inn► Fm Smrp
I
I =m 1.9N% I.BN% Imml IswO M.m Ns.JY! Ns.Sf! 1W.363 Io;NI 09tl1» M.1311
x OYOIM I.MI.OM I.MIA]6 O"m 3341M
OLOIM ;OA% E.N6M ImQO J]S,91q I,]61,M 1,)MAM ),OT,w3 I 1.197.03 ImwO 0.9f211w (IM.»6)
1 wm% 1.156.79E IJSI,M 0.919)N x2;063
s mWm 3.]99% 3.)SBN ImM )90.0w I}5].b3 1,)$1.776 ),b1,195 3,197,w3 IO;9N Or"m I21&W
6 0]m% 1}SI,T6 IA31.)]6 I a8M33 3AMI
mim )bB% J.Oi% Im.0.V ]940w 1,131,776 1.M .))6 ;w].55] 1 1,19],w) 101.5w 0.B361J) 12U.312
9 M)Im 1,»;As I,AS,)]5 1 OQ591] xll}Iz
9 mglm 1]99% ]YA% ImQO NS.Ow I.3mAm ;)34]]5 ).tlM.9]O I ],19),Os) IOasR 0916119 (I N,z10)
10 0].OI% 1.J]98H 1}WH 0.]96905 (IMAM
II =41% )6N% ]6N% 1mOw 915,m0 I,J»,9 S 1.m.us ).w].]N 1,19],wJ IOI.NI aallimmill,7MI4 (I M.W
IS mqm 1.»I.MS 1})1,3fs I a)59)19 M.'"
1) Nql% ].BY% ].BY% ImOw 04000 I}JI.MS 1,761,b5 J.09L»9 1 J.191ASJ IW.43 07UM (IM.I]w
Is wAH4100 1}D.011 1.J».011 I Omlm 123.3
I] mNAICW lbM l0N% Im.wO 950,Ow 1}2;011 I.11;011 J.w6.0Y1 ;191.w2 IOI,wO 8~1 ll»,M9)
16 0].NI/lml 1}115OJ 1.3».9w 063b51 IAS,SM
1) mNlgml 1198% 119M Im00D �6f,N0 I.M.1m 1.:Iw.m) 109L9w 1 J.19),w) IW,3M m6mm (Ix1,N3)
I9 0A1/Sw I,Mm,N3 5.514.NI I 0.6593H 193.IA
19 =141pw Uq% tJYN ImMO 0314mO ;Mm,193 S.s1a193 6A11,ffi I 493;w) Iw.]N 0.61M91 (10111B)
m OO.DIROw Ululs 162AIf 0617 IN.11l
EI NNIItmf a9Nlf] 9.ap% Im00D a]N,000 I.z1;6N ljl 6 4013.3)5 6,919}N Ib,wS 06126W (143,919
R 02N1/MW 1.119JH SONA)9 I 0599Y19 193,9111
U IXWI f l54% aSYM ImOw <.sTO.00D I,IIa9N 1.01 N 4819,%9 I 4931.IM 101.133 OXNw 119,%)
N 4XMI4t 03 1.0146w SAID. ) as]w10 119j99
» mp%N a6Yn l6N% ImOw y9mOw IAI46w Smm, 69EI.EIS 1 4921.6p ImMs a556&) (61.123)
36 wA1Rw6 mm"sms 999A55 a5mss 40%
21 MIAIN6 liY% alY% Im00D sA]4090 99➢A55 5.919A55 4919,111 4919.%1 IOIAN 0.513W (54650)
M 00m2N1 MA I mml 0.sI93M );x19
M OaNlI2m) a]SN% a19BM ImtlA S.M1m0 )MAGI 40HABl 4BE4.761 1 4933,OOp Iw}l9 050NN (2;)131
)I M14K)0B aBY1S 191M ImNO IIS.Om N1»l 75�573mm 1,6Y;191 I 1}»,3m 10.03 Ob2962 Imp
]] w.Nl/!m➢ MIN 654)96 0, 199 5 53.76E
» MNIMIO l94% a9Nk Imo» IM,wO Wall ]N5)B6 I.RI}ll I,s;s,MO Iw,6M 01»NS (3,)65)
M OLDIg010 6NA» 7W17 I 0559NS 51,557
)5 mNdmil 1919N {Mpl Im9m 135,000 61;913 Mk?24 1,<M,6N I 1,525,]OD Ib.SN 0<)9N0 (9M0)
56 IOWIMIl 6N,1N N4)N asvl)6 soim
» MIM12 aHB% aNB% 1m0o0 us,No 6µ3N ]»,)xi I,4x119 I}ss,MO Im,)» a"10 O.IX)
M w.N1=2 611.J95 m.us 0.NBIM 59,375
N mNl/301E l9NN lMM9 Im9m IW,mO N;»5 637MI 1,Q;70 1 I.s»]m IwA31 0.)ASOB (7,I96)
W mNl%» w],9x1 N],RI 1 0399N0 14512
N a MIM14 MB% aTN% 100990 IaaN N1931 6U�wlM,334 LQO,BIz Lsss.mo 1b}10 OlIM1 2)MI
47.579
93 NNI%19 a5V41,15 aNf11 ImNO 41JO.ON 04}N 4669}34 9.N4N1 1 9.514200 101,533 035W7 (9A21
N CoXIM35 - 9];9s0 <3;950 0MM3l 11A62
95 NN mI6 l9NN l9Y% ImOm 9,SIQON m.00 &96;9M 9,N5,9m 9}I1,lw Iw.11m O.NSrI 5.219
96 OLNIM16 M.670 331,6M 0.3MO 15,9M
97 O6NI/]016 aW% a9Y% ImNO 9AN.Om 3x1,610 91I81.6M 9.N>.15I 9,MNAllO IbAN O)MIN IB,9b
I
__N�mO 4s.0A,0i6 Iw.119a96 Iw}IMW I I0.se5.63l ;L66.sN Itsl.9sx
1
1
1
1
i
i, �
� �
t
t
t
1
1
1
1
[ L [ [ [ [ t [ [ [ [ e [ [ [ [ l e e
0 _.NCNLN OlAW J PACE
CIPWI iYbnG pw I.eG RmOatS Wb
4yl�o/®IFIm®IWOFaa®e ne..�wwa S.
s%L»am IW)RtlOWgCetltvlearleOgYW ce,wrneu
IItlleOUe l:C®Immteemsta
slRmGuatmxorwxGs � onulpxocwwluTE wroRwJnox
sous: Rdmdry bWIt I1F0 AH
ul.roauEm%I wwi%era.rW�
Re Miwu'. U6&ss.Ptl p I t10.Rn,Ptl C%btllApavoml RvpmIWYRA 3a1nC
MU mv�uuo/Ia Wav6 0 • I 0 Uny33JNCeYOwn ofPaury�b�
Rm Nmue 0 01 0
RtladlWl Nlam ArmNAmW 0 01 0 %ur]we0.de@S MIMI
PdaellWl PvagJAmml Aavul 0 01 0 fiY We 10.01A1
OWeeW IWl0.vaw Fud BYvm: IIflJ)1 01 ll'It.111 fiONs: IVI.O'ON
TWISwme UI,011j]I W I t6WU.331
TOW YUNnomY Reflvv4d f1I.6M.fW
I HMR—F : W,31J2n
%Tuulmtl: U910%
M1e:
RmwCOnaIm WOVMvy COR 41TLln
ReMN,q Frew IXpae. U5�59A W USA39A
Utlawumy9pu0 fHy3 0 sWb
Cmn M4vuim. IWAW O I IO1.OM
ENp�]orA�.e morel: a R I o
trLl Ser¢Rne�e pym'1', 41n)n 01 un.3n
wJ.uo o I v;uo --
Rwitl'mg JJ]s o I JSn MvwatANALYW3
Ta . WI,011))I b MI,OU�1
ObWun P%OlOOI s.IJ1M
TgyplygWvp; fl)II.M
TMtl1M VO0m Yr6g: tfb%s
IW W Futl AEjemimt' 0
NOTgtl Ilmtl VAn&my'. f)3F,06J
iwANCMGMTFS
_ ws%merxxR.e.wWRe Ems%
OtlaQ ONllfl]
F. OY➢IAJ
F INeef OWIAJ
FW Pw. og,o m
f0u Re0etlN mmu[ OH01AJ
W NWOCy 0001116
F CWGMFbRAUT
AOibyeTV Nmat JIAM
AWnTn .
LtlmOOF
I M73
OYI Rane FlOLL t4o"m
I]We^mV 3Pm 0W3%
Noevmflmotm: 0]IF%
[ L I I 1 l l l t I I I 1 [ l l l 1
1.®lual.crllcxa onn%
��]6Nuem osuiro arw.T��Kl
QR6911mpwems6 9q®1990.9}.8�e 9
sWAu.66o 19919KmA�yCgifiYnae�l:y.m�
31e.66.z S6m6%im5mm
TaW6 I O�OON6u6 S.Isxm
9ssl 9msl TOW IMh Sim Oh aA� 0.ran ry
OY Ib YW6 I,u F.Wd smw Pm Snip
I
1 WNI% S.IOp{ 5.100% IOOLW xS,OW 121501 )K,901 lN,S01 )99.261 N.)62 O.9S 6! N,IN
3 %AI% I.M,165 I,K9,165 0%x563 IN,)M
I OS01% $.1(0X 5.10p% IWWO x100W L. 794) 1. 9790 ),IN.)% I ).19).W) K.]E 011418 19t1%)
l Wilms I.M,190 1.12190 0.91N11 1 7
5 OW193 s.IWIY SIWM IOJ 000 MQ000 I.K;)90 I.]O;ISO ;115.180 1.19].OSI Sl,l]l 0191611 (9x,95))
6 W.OI% I,QQIW 1.616.IW I 0K9111 141.1611
) OIg1% S.IWF S.IOOK 100.0W ES.WO I.AIb.IW IAILIW ),10,)x0 1 ;197.OSJ 19.733 OM315 (9409KM)
9 0301M 1.620,I0 1,QD.IN1 ommi 1%.9W
9 OLD19) 5.1001t S.IW% 100.00D xS000D I,49.IN 1.Q1.753 I,IN,x95 I I.19),M) N,)51 01053N 1MAB
to oY(N% I.QI li) I.M.)5) 1 0185)M I%Ax5
11 (M()Im S.IWIS 5.100% IOp.000 ]Ipp)p I.QI.)% 1.]xl,l% ;IQ.%K 1 S19).0% %,SN O165W1 131N
Ix ON)199 1Aµ1W 1AµIW 0727M m
13 Otgl% 5.1614 SIOp% IW WO )xg0]D I,Nt101 1.]N,10) ),IN,WS I 3,197,03 N.BK 07M53 (99,639)
19 0]AIQOIp I.N5911 111 , 3 0.]091W U4610
IS ()VI)1 ]IN S.IOOK S.IWY 1000p0 %S,NO I.NS.W) I.M.W I,IK,f85 1.19].OS) 301N 0.6915% (34N6)
16 WAI/Agl I.M.KO 1.%1.ND 1 0.6)916] 1)5391
Il MNIM01 S.IWiI S.IW1l 100.000 )SOAW I.M.NO 1.l475 I.INAW I 1.197,W3 32231 o.W]1W (0A13)
11 Ox.01lNM I.M.47S 1.%d91s 0.6N1E IN.916
19 OV()1=1 S.IWM S.IW% Im WD tWS,OW 1.1NA)S S,I 03 4611.9f0 49C403I 50.101 O'6 (91A10)
x0 W.OIMM I.M.W3 5. 031 0601916 I20A13
xl OONIMW S.IWif 5.10DK IW.OW t%OWO I,IM,M3 S.SBa,051 6A60.I0 019AK 31.113 0.S9%32
MA31EE MWMOOxLAANAO)IIIIIMMgMMOWWMMW SA004 iA0p6 KD.000 6AIf,,0o1 .
I
1,17t101 1,17MW 0 SM741
WM3
5.10 % S.IOp IW0 6 % W 03 4eKW I Q,1M 5315 0. 6% 11M WIM I.M,1Q IM,143 05 11.939
0g1W S.I(m Slop 100 A,lSW 5 .4 ]% =m) (58.074)
w lT mols moil o3mm MM
x) MN sAp la . a I 3M 6I.05 1 419.9 49 0W (14N
)
S1A"s Slow 1 0. W A11
Qw,"S gW 6Wf, D AM% p )9}67cw
6)QM I 01 19 NA%]
31 Oe91/NO) S.IOJ% S.IN% IWOCO I10,T0 6146Q W% IAl),yi 1 1333.Np 51915 0K1751 (15A]o)
32 WAIMM 6]SSW WQSW I OMl% 15.911
% fl amlo SAWw sAaOM IMpJO IssaW 6l).SU W 38) 1.01;16s I 1Ax5.xW s)Als OMM O5.]Q)
3e WAIM10 6)0195 W50. 9s
% 4OIM10 0.100% EIOp{ IW.0o0 I140W 6]0)93 WSSW 1.115.H0 I,s3f1W 69,610 0 S�M3 (x7v
% WpllNll 66053 M95J OM163 17»0
I) MNIMII 0.100% SIW% 100.000 IK,000 W.M3 W495J I.Q)A05 1 ISri xOO SI,US O)95161 (1)M
% WRIMIx 6W.M 6W311 O3WEl %.Ex
% MIM1] SI00% 6.IW% IOOpoO I15,000 6WAS nkmMANS 1,()I,IW I 13x5,IDo Sl.N3 OS]SSW (11,191)
10 W.OIM1] 639.615 SKM I 03WI3 M
Q MIMI) 0.1W% 0.100% IW.00D 155,000 05.6W WS.6W IA)4l% 1 ISx5,31p 30A10 O%69% (la%11
Q OSOIMI6 W5.]13 WQ)3] 1 OJI79W ll,l%
O 01611M11 0.100% AIOp1 IoO.OW a150000 WQ])) IAOQE) 9.KLK5 9.SIQEO N,ll3 Q3 m 120%1
K WNIMIS M.M 01 R I O))WM xM%
N pii1m, a100N SIOON IW.OW 8,563,000 M. 9,W.Sw 9,K0,115 1 9,SII,IW 50.]Bf 0.)EM (eAl1)
K WA)IM16 Y193f0 E9300 1 0.3I001 I;KS
Q MOIM16 5.100% 0.100% IOOAW 9,OW.OW E9,3p0 9,xA,500 9A%,OW I 9308,311D NAW 0)06110 ;9Q
I
56ASSOW 47SIt831 IM,>MA51 101.)WA51 105385,Q6 1]13y31 t59%5
ION,
l [{fl [ 1 fl [ l t [ l l l l l fl fl (\I [ l
meanll.L�... _xnm. o)mx) �� vocal
Camp SUWaOa�CbOW afQup C�vW Synllwne FwJY u
Atlniuv Per$.%ueeue
GpW Inymavil Pryun 19p%,BmbB Crmml MaFee be li BF
[iP,ObAb 199)Peflmtilf C W ISJu NPM2PIOr1
SluNk 1:Cunldvd$gpapnVW
BgIMBOnwq OPF)IxW POFlPlCMOCMrgMIHMfgWqqx
BwM: PnOmtiy Bewv Ma. Ta
cawr favuxm dmm of aM J�aPY
MAmwi¢ f14M0.M0 b I f]AobAw Gp0)Ilmpwemml P.gwI0t0A),OatlrC
b%aMw/WOIIOaF[ 0 0 I o f]]t,JJJ.W]c wfLNtlpnbl
AmuM0var0 0 a I o
RJ%W IMIfYSVAmmJAmin 0 0 o %orlum ReMWM: mml
PYr1e01wlPoWptl Amity 0 0 1 B GBOMe: Owwl
PYIe11Ml RrawfW Be4—noe: 41u,071 a I 41tU71 GOfOw ]0000N
TpJSaem k;ttl,]tl b b; 71
-- Taw Puxmml wnm0el ulA4wo
J9il Pewee PmM1 pJIM
xTm.rm.n w.sbx
uw:
I Nem'e OlnN bpeOotlmgC00.: 41'ly71
0.e0uiEinp E'nw[Iey m: yl,OlO,)la b I UI,OMjN
1..rjag SpM JOJ,y® o I IM.M
cm an.m�am ]agaao 0 ]w,aM
IaYwil orAmueamlcer. 0 0 B
oasm�m Pawe nvam 4]tU71 a 4ma.
Lumna Fmrvm: ]oc?aB o Joc,]sP —
0.om�iP: VSI 0 USI SAVMOf A%ALY91S
TWlllra J6i,]]P]]1 W H),]]Pjtl
pmvOpyalyy; 1 1%
TaMdm BMnV: f4el]q
TdYflamJ Vtlm LtLp: fl.%1.1W
PmmeFutlMfmNwc 0
_—___ Na TaW AaW VeNl OMO'V' fl.%J.%0
FlHAHCMO UATIB
34)3)%
Bne6 0Y919)
Ckliene6' 01919]
F Nlwl (bU19)
Fw Oar. wg191
%w NPMeONNr[ UM M
Ir MW10- OB9Ina
EM.WCMa MFOPMA m
AN'AO lnuvt gS]01%ffi . av)tB]e
Nemml Fwm e S 19al RmwFrmG H,IRlj
IGtlewnmi83pv1 097 t
NL
Luwerca PmNum OM Arngelile: 1173,
t I t t t t 1 t t f 6 I t t t t 1 1 l E 1
60]tRRL LTIICHA W. O3 m
cur sawam 13�or0�.�ma4r
Cry8411v0nor®me nos.a 199J92 sam a
sse,osoaW 199l Ra6Mig(:nffie4u orP.ni�.l�
SOFeAAe2: Refim1vg D4M Swim
i9W ae�m1 0�6.�m6=¢ aWol%
Bmvl Bail imY Mtl 9w'ra Ddl 0m� OiI 5Pv
du RW YvM 94re P4914T1 West RMSwim Na Reela6 Servsa Ssrmp I. rv0w
I --
1 """M43W% 4.1m IMM0 wim 693.698 693.6W 1 199m 105.566 0.W81" 101,314
2 029194 1.M.3W 1.3 .WS 0954W M.M
3 089194 4.7W% 4,IM 100000 3XM 1.M.395 I,IOI,M 3,094.7%0 3,IW.053 Imm 0.942086 om!I4)
4 02N195 1.179.747 1A79.M 0.91W31 WI)49
5 N't)IM 4580K 4180% 100000 335.= 1,379.747 1.714.147 X0 M I %193.W3 102359 OW8180 (ICKM3)
6 mim 1.371141 1.371.741 1 0.871000 in"]
1 MIMS 4.180% 4, 0 Imm 350000 1.371.741 1,E1,741 3093.481 1 3IW.053 103.572 0.8563w (105,SIq
8 %9191 1,36I,T6 1,363,316 1 0 BM127 IX616
9 08/019/ 438M 4 m IM" M5,000 I.M3.316 1,12$336 3,091,151 3.IW.053 IOS.M2 0816410 (IM010)
10 02N1m 1,354,652 1.354.653 0.797159 IW,4M
11 =m 4180% 4.180% IO3.. 385.OW 1.354.W2 1,139,632 3.094.%4 1 3.M.053 10;149 0.))8M1 (10..847)
12 py0199 I,M5,451 1,343,451 1 0760006 IW.339
13 QNIr91 4.380% 43M IW.M 405.= I.M5.451 1.15O451 3.W5XI 1 3.10,053 101,152 0.14M5 (113,141)
H 02AV20W 1.333,D1 035.111 1 0]245W IM399
15 0 42p80 4.7M 4.7M IW.WB 4A.OW 1,335,111 1,755,771 3,W1.M2 1 3.1r.053 1WA11 0105W (11).Zl)
16 O2Po113001 1.325.133 0 733 OW(MI16 IW,4W
11 Mffln(01 4180% 4Im Iwm MO,OW I.M.733 1.765.733 3.01.466 3,1W.053 IOS.A3 0.6145M (11;185)
IB mv)l 2 1,315.217 1.315.217 1 0.65WA IM.593
19 NOI)I 2 4180% 4.180% IWOW 4.190.W0 1,315,217 5,505.211 6,8A,4M 1 6,922W3 101.619 064M89 (116.943)
A ON012W3 1,215.016 1.215,06 1 0.621925 161,W4
21 W I1 4.7m 4.1110K IW.WO 4385,W2 1.215.016 5.60O06 6A15.152 1 6A19,240 1010W 0.613119 (99911)
R 0bM4m)N 1.11%235 1.110.275 1 0398660 146,84)
23 OW1QW0 4.7M 4.7m IWOW 4,M." 1.11%215 3jW.215 6A15,549 6.921.IA 103.511 O.M4543 (slf
M ON119W5 I,WO4M I.M4M 0.57mm M.181
25 WNI/ 4.18014 4.18(K IMM) 4.BA.OW I.W0.454 5.m4M "Mm I 6.921,W0 IWi32 O551HA (W.W1)
26 (MM&M)16 W5,256 W5.256 1 OM4159 104.600
n f46012006 4.180% 4, W IWOW 5,045,OW W5,256 5,93O2M 015.512 1 &919.960 IO4.M 0.5313T (46b341)
28 (Xwl OD) 164A81 164.681 1 U181W B3,113
29 =1R0p1 4 M 4.7m IW.WO 5.290.W0 164681 61 M01 &919.M1 1 CIM.000 1W,639 0.SW564 (21,699)
30 OL01/3038 638,250 63&250 1 0.491619 613
31 (Y01/30W 41W% 4.180% Iwm 145.M 6M$ 7mm 1,421,4W I 1.525X9 IW.101 0®M55 (9.933)
32 0Y0112009 6M.184 6M.M I 0.411M1 W,214
33 W411/'OO9 4.7m 4180% IMM ISOOW 6M,184 1M.M IA19.568 I 1.30; 10.632 0.N0441 OVI5)
M (MI]I 010 631.199 631.193 0449589 5..016
35 =IMIO 4980% 15B0% IW.WO 1Wm 631.193 791.1% 1.422398 I,MS,2W 10 0.438W1 (12555)
M ()M)IM11 621,315 M.315 0.428636 51,962
31 MI)I 011 1180% 15W16 IWWO 16&OW 623,315 192.315 1A19.750 1,525.A0 IW,450 0418528 Oz; )
M MIMI2 M.432 623.432 0.4g659 56,812
39 WNIM32 Ims 11W6 IWOW 115,OW 623.432 1W,432 1.421.863 1525,2W 10,337 0.399022 (14 1)
40 0VW)IMI3 619,M9 619.2" 0389513 55ASI
M (OX)IM13 11W% 1RJ% IWWO ISS.W 619.249 IIN.249 I423,498 Ij25.=) I0I,7M 0.380425 (15A44)
42 MIM14 614.BW 614.828 M371455 54,01
43 (XPMM14 15&1% 11W% In= II.Mm 614,1118 8,1948M 9,4W,655 9,51%M 1W545 0.362696 (11,129)
M MIM15 419.3W 419,3M 0.3M143 36,733
45 (4A)IMIS 19,10, 1980% 10OW0 &MM 419J &989Am 9'4 651 1 9.511.IW Im; OM5192 (441)
M 0291MI6 214503 214.5W 1 0337M 19.434
41 (0NIM16 19W% 1MOK Imm 8,913AW 2145W 9,IN,SOI 9.404.W5 9.N8.3W 1041% 03TM16 16351
I
5&OSO,CW 45,W9,330 103,OA,210 I01,099,310 10.585.436 2.tl6,A15 1.565,560
3/17/93
a
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
JOB NO. P2-42-2 SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION AT PLANT 2
SUMMARY OF CONTRACTORS' INSURANCE BIDS AND
DISTRICTS' COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION(COCI PROGRAM SAVINGS
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR TOTAL INSURANCE DISTRICTS' CDC PROGRAM
BID BID CDC PREMIUM SAVINGS
MARGATE CONSTRUCTION 14,496,000 54,000 36,240 17,760
ZIEBARTH & ALPER (JV) 14,990,000 55,000 37,475 17,525
HUNTER CORPORATION 15,004,781 82,781 37,512 45,269
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS 15,296,800 53,000 38,242 14,758
STEVE P. RADOS, INC. 16,187,000 30,000 40,468 (10,468)
KIEWIT PACIFIC COMPANY 16,517,131 60,000 41,293 18,707
CDC_BIDI.XLS
3:41 PM
COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION
MASTER PROGRAM PROPOSAL
FOR
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY
March 17, 1993
Presented by:
Ted E. Davidson
Senior Vice President
Diana J. Sutton
Account Executive
, J
COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION
MASTER PROGRAM PROPOSAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
r Pie Numbers
r
I. Introduction 1
II. Schedule of Projects 2
r
' III. Marketing Results 5
IV. Our Recommendation 9
V. Appendix
• Specimen Policy Form
r • Bid Specification Wording
• Sample Certificate of Insurance
r
r
r
J
J
D=ODUCI'ION
J
J
J
J
J
J I�
r
j INTRODUCTION
r
We have prepared the following Course of Construction Program Proposal for your review. As
discussed in our previous report "Course of Construction Master Program", the advantages of
implementing an owner controlled Master Program lower insurance costs, administration control
and coverage consistencies.
r
This proposal is based on the Schedule of Projects provided by County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County under Section II of this proposal. Our marketing results including coverage,
d+ terms and premium comparisons for all proposals. Our recommended program is Proposal I,
the Zurich Insurance Company. A specimen policy form is included for your review.
We appreciate this opportunity to provide you with a program designed to be the most
comprehensive coverage, and low cost program to meet the Districts' Course of Construction
insurance needs.
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
I
u
-2
J
�.{ SCHEDULE OF PROJECTS
J
J
J
J
J
'%jol
i
�w
W SCHEDULE OF PROJECTS
r
The following Schedule of Projects was developed with the assistance of the District's Staff.
We submitted this schedule to provide underwriters with a typical District construction year so
s, that this proposal could be developed. This program is designed to address any and all
construction projects undertaken by the Districts.
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
2
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT SCHEDULE
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
PIKIECT ID START DATE )ONION VALUE • PROJECT DESCRIPTION
P1-36 August 1993 2 years $35,000,000 The secondary treatment expansion at Plant No.
6 menthe 1. This project expands our existing
secondary treatment capacity from 66 Md to 80
Md. The work includes the addition of large
elactrlc motors and blawers, refurbishing of
the existing reactor Death including news
piping and an air diffusion system, the
construction of tan new secaWry, clarifiers,
three nw dissolved air flotation units, a
secondary water pop plant Cfor the Orange
Canty Water District), and related
facilities. The work Is largely structural
concrete, most below grand. However, It does
Include substantial mechanical and electrical
work.
P2-35-2 S June 1993 1 year $7,000,000 Warehouse and Maintenance Buildings at Plant
P2-35-3 3 months No. 2. This project is the construction of
approximately 60,000 square fast of buildings
and warehouse facilities, all with tilt-up
construction.
P1-37 December 1993 2 years $32,000,000 Primary treatment facilities. This project is
8 months the construction of up to 72 Md of primary
treated basins. This work is the building of
reinforced co erote tanks, Including covers
similar to buildings.
P2-42-2 June 1993 2 years $25,000,000 Secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 2.
1 month This project Is modification to existing
secondary facilities end Includes the
lengthening of twelve secondary clarifiers.
The lengthening is 50 fast long and will
require dwetering for this below grade
construction. The work is largely reinforced
concrete construction with mechanical
additions. At" included is the construction
of an above ground dissolved air flotation
tank.
` Subject to change after receipt of bids.
3
County sanitation Districts of orange Canty
Construction Project Schehlle
Page 2
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
PROJECT ID START DATE PERIOD VALUE a PROJECT DESCRIPTION
J-26 November IW3 ➢ months $1,500,000 Personnel Building at Plant No. 1. This is
the construction of an approximately 5,000
square foot building using framed, above grade
construction.
TOTAL: $100,500,000
Subject to change after receipt of bids.
DATE: December 31, 1W2
PANELA\WP\CSDOC\CST-PRJ.SCN
4
J
J
J NARUE.TING RESULTS
J
J
J
J
J
J
�1
J
J
COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION
MASTER PROGRAM PROPOSAL
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
MARCH 1, 1993
PROPOSALI PROPOSALII PROPOSAL HI
INSURANCE COMPANIES: Zurich Insurance Company Insurance Company of North Albert Insurance Carpany
America
BEST'S 0110E RATING: A, Excellent; Class xV, A. Excellent; Class xIV, A, Excellent; Class V111,
Policyholders' Surplus of Policyholders' Surplus of Policyholders' Surplus of
52,000,000,000 or more $1,500,000,000 to $100,000,000 to $250,000,000
$2,000,000,000
CALIFORNIA STAWS: Admitted Admitted Admitted
POLICY YEAR: Three Years Optional Extensions One Year TMo Years
available after three years.
EFFECTIVE DATE: To be determined Same as Proposal 1 Same as Proposal 1
COVERAGE: "All Risk" Builders' Risk Same as Proposal 1 "All Risk" Builders' Risk
including Earthquake and Flood. including Flood and excluding
Earthquake.
LIMITS: $45,000,000 Per Occurrence $50,000,000 Per Occurrence 550,000,000 Per Occurrence
Slblimita:
Earthquake: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence and $5,000,000 Per occurrence, 25% of Estimated contract value
Annual Aggregate Annual Aggregate subject to for land Movement, per
maximun of $10.000,000 Annual occurrence and annual aggregate
Aggregate for all contractors
If sad; 510,000,000 Per Occurrence and $10,000,000 Per Occurrence, 550,000,000 Per Occurrence and
Annual Aggregate Annual Aggregate subject to Amaral Aggregate
maximum $25,000,000 Annual
Aggregate for all contracts
Transit: $500,000 $250,000 Per Contract (Options 25% of Contract Value
up to $1,000,000 available)
Offsite Storage; $500,OOD $250,OOD Per Contract (Options 25% of Contract Value
up to $1,000,000 available)
5
PROPOSAL I PROPOSAL n PROPOSAL III
s blimits:
(continued)
Debris R.val: $5,000,000 $50,000,000 25% of contract Value
Expe,dit in,
Expense: $250,000 $250,000 coverage available at
additional premftm
Extra E.pn , $1,000,000 Nan. coverage available at
additional premium. More
inforestion fa needed.
DEDUCTIBLES:
All other Perils: $10,000 510,000 $5,000 for projects tp to
$10,000,000 contract Value
$10,000 for projects up to
350,OOO,ODD Contract Value
flood: $50,000 $250,000 5100,000
Earthquake: 5% of values at risk at time of 5% of values at risk time of 5% of values at risk time of
lass subject to $100.000 loss subject to 5250,000 loss subject to 5250,000
minimum. minimm. mini mum.
TOTAL INSURABLE VALUES: $100,500,000 $100,500,000 a100,50D,000
ANNUAL RATE: 5.125 5.245 $.1825
ANNUAL PREMIUM: $125,625 • $246,225 • $183,413
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS: Deposit prmmiva of 525,000 Rates proposed are a Mini mum premi us per project
required. cmposite including is SSCD.
Earthquake and flood.
Projects declared under Return proof ua available if
policy covered to Deposit Premi Ora of S250 total final contract value
completion. required. is less than estimated
value.
• Projects other than
wastewater treatment to be
admitted and written at
rate to be agreed.
• Does not represent actual premium due to different project terms. Premiums are provided for comparison only.
6
PROPOSAL I PROPOSAL II PROPOSAL III
agmt)tauL CONDITIONS: After addition of project
(Conti mass) to this policy there will
be no cancellation of the
project.
Rates for full land
movement coverage to be
verified upon binding.
• Rates subject to increase
for renovation.
• Projects other than
wastewater treatment to be
submitted and written at
rate to be agreed.
2/22/93-CZOCNCM-PROP.93
7
r
ADDITIONAL MARKETING RESULTS
r
We also approached National Union (AIG), Home Insurance Company and Reliance National.
Declinations were received from these insurance companies due to limited reinsurers that provide
reinsurance for the limits specified in this proposal. Rates were expected to match those in our
comparison. Reliance National could not provide earthquake capacity.
If additional Earthquake coverage is desired on individual projects, excess coverage is available
at competitive rates. Excess All Risk limits are available for projects larger than $45,000,000.
Any excess coverage desired would be provided by other insurance companies.
r
r
r
`� 8
1
u
1
-J
J OUR RECCbR ENDATION
1
r
1
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
.I
i OUR RECOMMENDATION
We recommend the following action:
1. Selection of Proposal I, Zurich Insurance Company for a three year policy tern.
The Zurich proposal has the following advantages:
• Three year term with guaranteed rate including Farhquake and
Flood. An extension is available at the end of three years. .
The policy rate will be reevaluted at this time and is subject to
change due to market conditions.
• High sublimity for Transit, Offsite Storage and Debris Removal.
• Extra Expense offered at no additional premium.
• Lowest annual rate offered.
We have reviewed the Zurich policy form included in this proposal and find it to
be acceptable.
2. All future construction projects requiring Course of Construction insurance will
be provided coverage under the Master Program.
9
;J
J
J ASIX
J
u
U
J
J
J
J
J
uapdR "zb s�'i�-41 MTS DHS.SERVICE Bae 772 E7% P.E.zz9002i022
COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION INSURANCE POLICY
POLICY NO.
THE INSURANCE COMPANIES SUBSCRIBING HERETO (HEREINAFTER CALLED THE
INSURERS) EACH ONLY FOR ITSELF AND NOT ONE FOR ANOTHER BY THIS JOINT
POLICY OF INSURANCE DO INSURE
r
AND THEIR WHOLLY OWNED OR MAJ9
CONTROLLED SUBSIDIARIES. !�''
r
1
In Witness Whereof the Insurers,
through ENCON Underwriting Agency, Inc.
duly authorized by them for this purpose,
have executed and signed this policy.
PER: PER.•
DATED: DATED:
THIS POLICY CONTAINS CERTAIN CONDITIONS WHICH MAY LIMIT THE AMOUNT
PAYABLE.
ENDORSMIENTS ATTACHFD:
ENDORSEMENT No. 1 -
"' ENDORSEMINT NO. 2 -
ENDORSEMERT NO. 7 -
ENDORSEMENT NO. a -
,� ENDORSEMENT NO. S -
ENDORSBf(8NT NO. 6 -
ENDOR8931ENT NO. 7
ENDORSEMENT NO. 8 -
eC/e7
�`YFlN 20 '93*'I5 4e MTS INS.SER/ICE 818 772 2798 P.3,22
Builders Risk Policy
Page 1
BUILDERS RISK POLICY
DECLARATIONS
1. a) NAMED INSUREDS
.r
b) ADDITIONAL INSURED:
All hereinafter " ferred to as the INSURED.
I
2. LOSS PAYABLE:
3 . TERM OF INSURANCE: Both 12:01 A.N. Standard Time at Project Site.
Effective Data: Expiration Dates
4 . LIMITS AND DEDUCTIBLES:
ITEM LIMIT
Policy limit for any cne $
lose or occurrence
SUBLIMITS DEDUCTIBLES
Project Site - Physical Damage $ $ Except
Earthquake - Annual aggregate $ S
Flood - Annual Aggregate $ $
r, Transit S S
Off Site S $
Delay in Completion Coverage $ Day waitinc
Period
Dabrie Removal $ S
06/92
ua}�N �d '93 1t�42 MTS INS.SERVICE 618 7-2 2796 - P.4%2Z0004/022
w I
Builders Risk Policy
Page 2
a S. DESCRIPTION 0? PROJECT:
m
6. IACATION OF PROJECT: '
7 . ESMI FATED TOT T:
\� S. PREHIM( AND ADJUSTMENT:
a) Adjustment Rate (par Annum) $ per $100 of total
project cost
b) Annual Premium (Provisional) $
c) Term Premium (Provisional) $
d) Minimum Earned Premium $
a) Installment $ Due
f) Installment $ Due
q) Installment $ Due
06/92
uif�ifJ cO '93 'ig%2 MTS IMS.SERVICE 018 772 2796 R.522fl 005/022
ti Builders Risk Policy
page 3
SUBSCRIBING INSURERS AND PERCENT SUBSCRIBED
PSimary Insurars �reent Subscribed
First $ any one occurrence but in the aggregate per
annum for each of the perils of Flood and Earthquake excess of any
deductibles.
� 4
* 9 IDSVIM
r
S any ccurrence but in the aggregate per antrum
for each of the p a or Flood and Earthquake excess of the
�.../ Primary $ any one occurrence but in the aggregate
per annum for each of the perils of Flood and Earthquake which in
turn excess of the deductibles.
+ Second Excess Inge
5 any one occurrence but in the aggregate per
antrum for each of the perils of Flood and Earthquake excess of
$ any one occurrence but in the aggregate per annum
for each of the perils of Flood and Earthquake which in turn excess
of the deductibles.
ea/92
��.J *.'0 '9S`1T:43 MTS INS.SERVICE SIB 77Z 2796 p,6/ZTUUtl/U2L
Builders Risk Policy
Page a
+ Third Excess Insurers percent eubscribed
9 any one occurrence but in the aggregate per annum
for each of the perils of Flood and Earthquake excess of
$ . any one occurrence but in the aggregate per annum
for each of the perils of Flood and Earthquake which in turn excess
of the deductibles.
i
I
• The coverage provided by the Excess Insurers is subject to the
following Drop-Down Clause:
In the event of reduction or exhaustion of the underlying annual
aggregata limit(s) in respect of Flood and Earthquake, it is agreed
that such insurances an is afforded by the Excess layer(s) shall
respond excess of such reduced amount, or in the avant of
exhaustion of such underlying amount the Excess layer(s) will
respond as underlying insurance.
sa/92
a 'Al14:aa nrs r+s;SERVICE 818 772 2796 P,7,aO87i022
m Builders Risk Policy
page S
� PART A - COVERAGE
I. INSURING AGREEMENT:
Subject to the limitations, exclusions, terms and conditions
contained herein, this Policy insures, in respect of occurrences
happening during the term of this Policy, against:
'- Physical lama or damage to the property insured, except as
excluded hereunder.
2. PROPERTY INSURED:
a) AT PROJECT SITES
(1) Permanent Works - All , gu m t, machinery and
supplies of any a property of the
INSURED or o rs the INSURED may have
assumed r i ty, value of which has been
includ Total Project Cost on the
Dacl a or to be used in or incidental tol
the di OR
n, demolition of existing structures,
erection r fabrication and/or reconstruction and/or
repair the project insured, commencing When the
property becomes at the INSURED'S risk at the sit&, and
while there awaiting, during and subsequent to erection
and/or fabrication and/or repair and/or testing;
(2) Temporary Works - All scaffolding, formwork, fences,
shoring, hoarding, falsawork and temporary buildings all
incidental to the project and the value of which has been
included in the Estimated Total Project Cost on the
Declarations Page.
b) TRANSIT:
Transit coverage shall only apply provided that a specific
sublimit is indicated on the Declarations Page with re&peet to
., property to enter into and form a part of the project insured,
from the commencement of loading at the original point of
shipment anywhere in Canada or the States of the United States
of America, its territories and possessions, until arrival at
"d the site including shipments on inland or coastal waters but
excluding ocean marine shipments.
The Insured agrees to keep records of all shipments insured
hereunder and make them available to the Insurers upon
request.
06/92
'93 z.'44 n78 !NS.SEPVICE 818 772 Z796 P.6iZZ3 aoniu2Y
Builders Risk Policy
Page c
PART A - COVERAGE (Continued)
2 . PROPERTY INSURED: (Continued)
b) TRANSIT: (Continued)
This coverage shall be void if the Insured enters into any
special agreement with carriers, releasing them from their
common law or statutory liability or agreeing that this
insurance shall in any way inure to the benefit of such
carriers; however, the Insured may, without prejudice to this
coverage, accept such bills of lading, receipts, or contracts
of transportation as are ordinarily i ad by carriers
containing a limitation as to the Val operty insured.
c) OFF SITE:
Off site coverage shall that a specific
aubllmit is indicated o e s Page with respect Co
property to enter in n fo a of the project insured,
anywhere in Can s of the United States of
America, its a sseasions, but excluding such
property whi n c of manufacturing or processing at
the manufactu a plier's site.
3 . LIMITS OF LIABILIT
The Insurers shall not be liable for more than the amounts shown
in the Declarations, Section 4 , in any one loss or occurrence.
The insurance as provided under this Policy shall not be reduced '.
by the sum paid in any one loss or occurrence except as respects
the perils of Flood and Earthquake.
4 . DEBRIS REMOVAL:
a) This Policy covers expenses incurred during the currency of
this Policy for the removal of debris of the property covered
hereunder which may be occasioned by loss caused by any of the
perils insured against in this Policy. However, the total
liability under this Polley for loss to property and removal
of debris shall not exceed the Limit of Liability stated on
the Declarations Page.
b) This debris removal coverage does not apply to pollutants and
contaminants clean up and removal costs.
c) This debris removal coverage does not apply to debris removal
expense as excluded under Perils Excluded 1 n) contained
herein.
i
o6/92
"JLiN lb '9Yi!r45 MTS !MS.SER`JICE SIB 772 2796 p,9/Ez9 Vuaivi2
Builders Risk Policy
Page 7
i PART A - COVERAGE (Continued)
5. TESTZNGt
a) This policy is extended to provide coverage for testing,
including, but not limited to, hot tasting, start up, and/or
commissioning operations, and including the separate testing
of individual components of the entire project.
b) The premium stated in this Policy includes a testing period
e. as shown on attached Testing Endorsement. Subject to prior
notification, it is agreed thnt exti of the period for
hot testing shall be covered at exisana olicy rates.
' 6. DEDUCTIBLE:
From the amount of each claim o age arising out of
one occurrence when finall ere shall be deducted
the applicable amount as ed aelarations, and then the
liability under this P hal only the amount of such loss
,- in excess there* a limits act forth in the
Declarations. ! f a one physical damage deductible
applies to a si le e, only the highest deductible will
apply to the er s. Deductibles for physical damage and
delay in completio sea shall each apply separately.
7. TERMINATION OF LZADILITY:
The property referred to herein shall be insured until they
project has been formally accepted by the OWNER or the expiry
data of the Policy stated on the Declarations Page, or
cancellation of the Policy, whichever first occurs. Subject to
Insurers' agreement, this Policy may he extended by the NAKED
INSURED by payment of additional premium to ba agreed.
PART B - EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS
THIS POLICY SHALL NOT PAY FOR:
1. PERILS EXCLUDED:
a) Consequential lose or damage of any kind or description
including loss of market or delay, whether caused by a peril
insured or otherwise, but this exclusion shall not apply to
delay in completion coverage when it is provided hereunder;
b) Cost of making good faulty or defective workmanship or
material, but this exclusion shall not apply to physical
damage resulting from such faulty or defective workmanship or
material;
06/92
•fRfi ±:7 '93 46 MTS II�SD SERVICE 819 772 2796 •��•���
P.10Z
Builders Risk Policy
Page s
P11RT 8 - EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS (Continued)
1. PERILS EXCLUDED: (Continued)
c) Loss or damage caused by fault, defect, error or omission in
design, plan or specification, but this exclusion shall not
apply to physical loss or damage resulting from such fault,
defect, error or omission in design, plan or specification;
d) Wear and tear, gradual deterioration, inherent vice, latent
4 defect, corrosion, rust, dampness or dryness of the
atmosphere, unless direct physical loan) o image by a peril
insured ensues and then this Poli cover for such
ensuing loss or damage only;
e) Loss or damage directl occasioned by,
happening through or in invasion, acts of
foreign enemies, h i ti r war be declared or
not) , civil w 11 revolution, insurrection,
military or s ial law or confiscation or
m nationalize n i on or destruction of or damage to
property by t order of any government or public or
local authors
f) Lose or damage arising directly or indirectly from nuclear
reaction, nuclear radiation or radioactive contamination,
however such nuclear reaction, nuclear radiation or
radioactive contamination may have been caused; nevertheless
if a fire arises directly or indirectly from nuclear
reaction, nuclear radiation or radioactive contamination, any ,
loss or damage arising directly from that fire shall (subject )
to the provisions of this Policy) be covered, excluding
however all loss or damage caused by nuclear reaction,
nuclear radiation or radioactive contamination arising
directly or indirectly from that fire;
g) Loss due to disappearance or revealed by inventory shortage
alone;
h) Infidelity or dishonesty of the Insured or any of the
Insured's employees, or persons to whom the insured property
is entrusted;
i) Loss or damage to insured property while covered by Ocean
Marine Insurance or while water-borne in the course of ocean
shipment;
06/9a
O1/74ti"Z'3 '93 1446 IM?S INS.SERVICE ele 772 2796 .- P.
Builders Risk Policy
Page 9
PART B - EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS (Continued)
1. PERILS EXCLUDED: (Continued)
j) Loss, damage, costs, expenses, fines or penalties incurred or
sustained by or imposed on the Insured at the order of any
government agency, court or other authority arising from any
cause whatsoever beyond the demolition of any damaged portion
of the project no longer useful for its intended purpose;
k) The expense tot
1. Extract Pollutants and/or Contaminants from the debris or;
2. Extract Pollutants and/or Contaminants To and or water;
or
7 . Remove, restore or replace p 1 ontaminated
land or water; or
4 . Remove or transport ro abris to a site for
storage or decon t reams because the property or
.debris is nts and/or Contaminants
whether or a , transport, or decontamination )
is required or lation.
1) Debris removal as occasioned by the enforcement of any
Federal or any Government Agency, political body or state or
municipal law or ordinance which necessitates the demolition
of any building or any portion of any building covered
hereunder which has not suffered damage by any of the perils
insuradl
m) Loss or damage covered under any written or implied guarantee
or warranty by any contractor, manufacturer or supplier, but
only to the extent of recovery from such written or implied
guarantee or warranty by such contractor, manufacturer or
supplier;
n) Lass or damage caused by, resulting from, contributed to or
made worse by actual, alleged or threatened release,
® discharge, escape or dispersal of contaminants or pollutants,
all whether direct or indirect, proximate or remote or it
whole or in part caused by, contributed to or aggravated bl
_ any physical damage insured by this Policy;
This exclusion shall not apply when loss or damage is directly
causad by fire, lightning, aircraft impact, explosion
rupture, riot, civil commotion, smoke, vehicle impact.
windstorm, hail, vandalism, malicious mischief.
06/91
°1IAN zO '9Y1Y-"47 MTS INS.SERVICE 91S 772 2796 P. 1222012/022
W Builders Risk Policy
Page 10
PART B - EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS (Continued)
1. PERILS EXCLUDED: (Continued)
o) It is understood and agreed that this policy does not cover
the cost of removing asbestos material from property insured,
unless the asbestos is itself damaged by a direct physical
loss from any external cause covered heroin. However, the
Insurers will not pay for the costs to remove the undamaged
portion of any asbestos material; or the increased costs of
demolishing, rebuilding, repairing or the loss of use of the
undamagad portion of property insured, as a result of the
enforcement of any law or ordinance regulating asbestos
material.
2 . PROPERTY EXCLUDED:
a) Land and land values; howeAs n included in the
contract bid documents earth to be used in
completion of the j t uded;
b) Contractors' t unless the value of same is
reported t J additional premium 1s paid at a
rota to be ' •
c) or aircraft;
or a ant licensed for highway use, rolling stack,
or aircraft;
d) Water and watercraft;
a) Accounts, bills, currency, stamps, deeds, evidence of debt,
checks, money, securities, plans, blueprints, models,
renderings, specifications or other property of a similar
nature;
f) Existing property at the project site unless separately
"Glared to the Insurers in advance.
PART C - DEFINITIONS
1. NAMED INSURED:
The NAMED INSURED shall be deemed the sole and irrevocable agent
of each and every INSURED under this Policy for the purpose of:
r
a) giving to or receiving from the Insurers notice of
cancellation;
.. b) giving instructions to or agreeing with the Insurers for
alterations of this Policy;
c) making or receiving payments of premiums or adjustments of
premium.
e6/92
V a�JFNi Z� 'S3'0 4S MTS INS.SERVICE 918 772 - �
2795 P.13%2_ 13/u[Y
Builders Risk Policy
Page 11
PART C - DEFINITIONS (Continued)
2. ADDITIONAL INSURED:
The ADDITIONAL INSURED shall include all persons, firms or
corporations specifically named or falling within the general
description stated on the Declarations Page.
3. INSURED:
The INSURED shall mean all persons, firms or corporations
included as the NAMED INSURED and ADDITIONAL INSURED.
4. FLOOD:
Wherever in this Policy the term "f o o*it shall be held
to mean:
a) A general and tempera mplete inundation of
normally dry land fro
1. The overlto o waters;
2. The un 1 accumulation or runoff of surface
waters s Cal
3. Mudslides .a. mudflows) which are caused by flooding as
defined in subparagraph a) 2. , above and are akin to a
river of liquid and flowing mud on the surfaces of normally
dry land areas, as when earth is carried by a current of
water and deposited along the path of the current;
.. 4. Tsunami caused by earthquake or seaquake.
b) The collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake
or other body of water as a result of erosion or undermining
caused by waves or currents of water exceeding the cyclical
levels which result in flooding as defined in a) 1. above.
r S. EARTHDUAXE: 1
Wherever in this Policy the term "earthquake" occurs, it shall
include, but not be limited to, shocks, tremors, volcanic action,
mud flow, earth rising Or shifting, land slide, subsidence, or
any other earth movement.
06/92
u4/TFN 20 'W 15148 MTS INS.SOWICE 818 772 2796 P. 14/2'a14/022
Builders Risk Policy
Page 12
PART C - DEFINITIONS (Continued)
S. OCCURRENCE:
In the event of a loss, disaster or casualty or a series of
losses, disasters or casualties caused by one peril insured,
acting alone or in combination with other perils insured, there
shall be doomed to have been one OCCURRENCE. In respect of the
perils of FLOOD and EARTHQUAKE and WINDSTORM, OCCURRENCE Shall
mean all losses arising as a result of such FLOOD or EARTHQUAKE
or WINDSTORM during a continuous period of seventy-two
(721 hours.
7. POLLUTANTS AND/OR CONTAMINANTS1
Any material which, after its release, can ausa or threaten
damage to human health or human velfa&, ,.d
as or threatens
damage, deterioration, loss of val lity or loss of
use to property insured hereunder of limited to,
bacteria, fungi, virus or h s listed in the
-. Federal Water Pollution C Air Act, Resource
Conservation and Rac et Toxic Substances
Control Act, or ate the U.S. Environmental
Protection Age
8. TESTING t
a) Hot Testing
Any start up, commissioning or other forms of testing making
use of any feedstock including operational or performance
test. Hot testing shall be deemed to have commenced upon the
introduction of feedstock.
b) Cold Testing
'- Any testing, exclusive of Hot Testing as defined above,
including but not limited to electrical, mechanical,
hydraulic, hydrostatic, and pneumatic.
c) For the purpose of the foregoing definitions, the start
up and testing of building systems shall be considered to be
Cold Testing.
9. CONSTRUCTION TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT-
Contractors' tools and equipment that do not become a Permanent
part of the project.
r
06/92
O1.JPN E0 '9Y 15:49 NTS INS.SERVItt 91B 772 2796 P. SE2'c41d/022
Builders Risk Policy
Page 13
PART C - DEFINITIONS (Continued)
10. INSURANCE MANAGERI
The INSURANCE MANAGER is ENCON Underwriting Agency, Inc. acting
aa. an agent of the Insurers for the purposes of issuing and
Signing this Policy and for the issuing and receiving of notices
as provided by this Policy. The INSURANCE MANAGER is not a party
to this Policy.
PART D - CONDITIONS
I. OTHER INSURANCE:
If, on the happening of any loss or gs to the property
insured, there is in force other covering the same
interest, other than excess ins n , olicy shall act as
contributory insurance and sh
1 t 1 for more than the
proportion of such loss a as the amount of
insurance under this the total amount of
,r insurance on the p o sunder whether or not all
suchothar ins 4"au—
W a Clause.
Permission a INSURED to have excess insurance
overthe L a ity set forth on the Declarations Page
Without
prejud a to this policy and the existence of such
insurance, i Y, shall not reduce any liability under this
Policy.
2. OCCUPANCY:
' Permission is granted for occupancy of the project insured
hereunder for the purpose it was intended.
1. PREMIUM ADJUSTMENT:
The premium stated on the Declarations Page is provisional.
Within thirty (30) days after completion of the project, the
NAMED INSURED shall report the Final Total Project Cost to the
INSURANCE MANAGER. The actual premium shall be calculated from
the inception date of the Policy, on the total cast so reported
at rata(s) shown in this Policy. If the premium so calculated
exceeds the provisional premium, the NAMED INSURED shall pay to
the Insurers the amount of such excess. If such premium is less
than the provisional premium, the Insurers shall refund to the
NAMED INSURED the amount of the difference, subject to the
minimum earned premium stated herein.
4 . CONTROL.
This insurance shall not be invalidated by any act or neglect of
r, which the INSURED, or any employee of the INSURED, has neither
knowledge nor control.
06/92
va JRN 20 '?315 50 MTS INS.SERVICE 61E 772 2756
P.SEi22016/022
Builders Risk Policy
Page 16
PART D - CONDITIONS (Continued)
5. CONPORMANCE TO STATUTES:
To the extent that any of the provisions of this Policy are
governed by federal or state statutes, the comparable provisions
of this Policy shall be deemed to be amended in accordance with
such statutes.
6. CLAIM AGAINST TRANSIT CARRIER AND/OR BAILEE,.
No claim for loss or damage during trans t shall be payable
hereunder until the INSURED has filed aim with and made
reasonable efforts to secure payme the transporting
carrier and the carrier has denied 1 1
7. MISREPRESENTATION
If any person or entit yi urance falsely describes
the property to the e o usurers or misrepresents or
.d fraudulently omi a any circumstances which is
material to b a Insurers in order to enable thaw i
to judge the a ertaken, this Policy shall be void as I
to any propert lation to which the misrepresentation or
omission is me 1.
S. ERRORS I OMISSIONS,
No unintentional Errors or omissions in any intormation required
to be reported to the Insurers at the time of inception will
prejudice the Insured's right of recovery, but will be reported
to the Insurers as soon as practicable when discovered.
9. MATERIAL CHANGE:
Any change, material to the risk and within the control and
knowledge of the INSURED, which increases the exposure of loss to
the Insurers, shall be promptly reported within 30 days in
writing to the Insurers.
10. ASSIGNMENT:
The Insured agrees not to transfer any legal rights or interests
in the Policy without the Insurers' written consent.
11. CHANCY O8 INTEREST:
,r The Insurers shall be liable for loss or damage occurring after
an authorized assignment under the Bankruptcy Act of change of
title by succession, by operation of law or by death.
06/92
MTS IN9.SET"/ICE 91a 772 2796 P..7 LW47/UEY
Builders Risk Policy
Page 15
PART D - CONDITIONS (Continued)
12. FRAUD=
Any fraud or willfully false statement in a statutory declaration
in relation to any of the particulars herein shall invalidate the
Claim of the person or entity making the declaration.
13. NOTICE AND DROOP OF LOSS:
In the &vent of lose or damage the INSURED shall:
a) give written advice thereof to the Insurers within sixty (60)
dayal
b) protect the property from further lose
c) exhibit to any person des all that
.� remains of any prope iA1]kkatqr1rs
d) produce for 1 unt, bills, invoices
and vouche a a Ccuments pertaining to the
interest of under or a certified copy thereof
if originals b t, at such reasonable time and place as may
be designat y the Insurers or their representatives and
permit extracts and copies thereof to be made(
a) file with the Insurers, within six (6) months from the date of
loss, a detailed sworn proof of loss. Failure by the INSURED
to report the said loss or damage and to file said sworn proof ,
of loss an hareinbefore provided, shall invalidate any claim i
under this Policy for such loss.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, all claims for lose or damage
under this Policy must be filed with the Insurers within the
sixty (60) day period immediately following the expiration or
termination of this Policy.
14. WHO MAY GIVE NOTICE AND PROOF:
Notice of loss may be given, and proof of loss may be made, by
the Agent of the INSURED in case of absence or inability of the
INSURED to give notice or Take the proof, and absence or
inability being satisfactorily accounted for, or in the like
came, or it the INSURED refuses to do so, by a person to whom any
Part of the insurance money is payable.
O6/92
O3/7"e0 •93'15:51 MTS INS.SERVICE 218 772 2796 "'Altl/V'LL
r -
Builders Risk Policy I
Page 16
PART D - CONDITIONS (Continued)
Is. VALUATION:
Claims shall he settled under this Policy on the basis of the
actual cost of repair and/or replacement with materials of like
kind and quality less BETTERMENT as of the date of loss or
damage, but in no event to exceed the Limit of Liability. It is
understood that the foregoing shall include overhead and profit
in the same proportion as that of the contract bid documents.
16. PARTIAL LASS:
The Insurers hereby grant permission to repair any partial damage
to the property insured which can be qftni eniontly and
advantageously undertaken. The Insur reimburse the
INSURED who has suffered the los f Lai cost of such
repairs, subject always to th Les and Limits
of Liability stated on t
17. DUE DILIGENCE:
The INSUM shn d 1 genes and do and concur in doing
all things reason practicable to avoid or diminish any lossi
of or damage to property herein insured.
...
18. SUBROGATION:
If the Insurers pay a claim under this Policy, they will be
subrogated, to the extent of such Payment, to all the Insured's
rights of recovery from other persons, organizations and
entities. The insured will execute and deliver instruments and
papers and do whatever else is necessary to secure such rights.
,., The Insurers will have no rights of subrogation against:
a) any person or entity, which is a Named Insured or an
Additional Insured:
b) any other parson or entity, which the Insured has waived its
rights of subrogation against in writing before the time of
loss)
e) notwithstanding the foregoing, it is a condition of this
Policy that the Insurers shall be subrogated to all the
Insured's rights of recovery against any Arehiteee or
Engineer, whether named as an Insured or not, for any loss or
damage arising out of the performance of professional services
in their capacity as such and caused by any error, omission,
deficiency or act of the Architect or Engineer, by any persor
eaployed by them or by any others for whose acts they art
legally liable.
e6/92
".Ptl �0 '93'15'S2 MTS INS.SftVICE S18 772 2796 P. 19i22a1a,uzz
Builders Risk Policy
Page 17
PART D - coNDiTioNs (continued)
18. SUBROGATION: (Continued)
In no event shall the Insured waive his right of subrogation
against architects, engineers and manufacturers/suppliers of
equipment or material.
The Insured will act in concert with the Insurers and all
other interests concerned in the exercise of such rights of
recovery.
If any amount is recovered as a result of such proceedings,
the net amount recovered after deducting the costs of
recovery, will accrue first to the Insur in proportion to
their respective interests. Any exee is amount will be
remitted to the Insured. If h recovery, the
interests instituting the pro d the expense of
the proceedings proport
The Insured w n ess to prejudice such
rights of r
l9'J APPRAISAL:
v/ It the Insured the Insurers fail to agree as to the amount Of
loss, each shall, on the written demand of either, made within
sixty (60) days after receipt of proof of lose by the Insurers,
select a competent and disinterested appraiser, and the appraisal
shall be made at a reasonable time and place. The appraisers
shall first select a competent and disinterested umpire, and .
failing for fifteen (15) days to agree upon such umpire, then an '
the request of the Insured or the Insurers, such umpire shall be i
selected by a judge of a court of record in the state in which
such appraisal is pending. The appraisers shall than appraise
the loss, stating separately the replacement cost at the time of
lose and the amount of loss. The Insured and the insurers shall
each pay his or their chosen appraiser and shall bear equally the
other expenses of the appraisal and umpire. The Insurers shall
not be held to have waived any of their rights by any act
relating to appraisal.
m
06/92
""7PiV20 '93 15:52 M7S INS.SERVP_E 818 772 279E
Builders Risk Policy
Page is
PLAT D - CONDITIONS (Continued)
20. ENTRY, CONTROL, ABANDONMENT.
Attar the loss or damage to the property insured, the Insurers
shall have an immediate right of access and entry by accredited
agents sufficient to enable them to survey and examine the
property, and to make an estimate of the loss or damage and,
after the INSURED has secured the property, a further right of
access and entry sufficient to enable them to make an
appraissaant or particular estimate of the loss or damage, but
the Insurers shall not be entitled to the control or possession
Of the property insured, and without the neent of the Insurers
there can be no abandonment of the insured.
21. SUE AND LABORS
In case of loss or e, 1 wful and necessary for
the INSURED, his r , ervants and assigns to sue,
labor and n a ut the defense, safeguard and
-, recovery re arty hereunder or any part thereof
without p is insurance, nor shall the acts of the
INSURED or ur rs, in recovering, saving and preserving the
property IN in case of loss or damage be considered a waiver
or an aeeap nee of abandonment. The expenses so incurred shall
`a✓ be borne by the INSURED and the Insurers proportionately to the
extent of their respective interests.
W Any payment made pursuant to their cause, shall not serve to
increase the Limit of Liability at the project site, as stated on
the Daolarations Page.
22. RECORDS:
a) Books and records will he kept by the INSURED in such manner
that the total contract price of the operations covered by
this Policy and the exact amount of any loss or damage can he
accurately determined.
b) The INSURED shall allow any person designated by the Insurers
to inspect and audit the INSURED'S records at any reasonable
time and place and permit extracts and copies thereof to be
made.
27 . sUIT AGAINST INSURERS:
Every action or proceeding against the Insurers for the recovery
Of any claim or by virtue of this Policy shall be absolutely
barred unless commenced within one (1) year next after which the
loss or damage occurs.
O8/92
Vl/7RN 29 '93 1S 53 MTS !H&SERVICE BIB 772 2796 +/V+-
P.21 22/
Builders Risk Policy
Page 19
PART D - CONDITIONS (Continued)
24. INSPECTION:
The Insurers may inspect the property insured at any reasonable
time at the Insurers' option. These inspections are for the
benefit of the Insurers only. The Insurers' right to inspect or
make any inspection neither states nor implies that the INSORED'S
property or operations are safe, harmless to health or in full
compliance with any laws, rules and regWivons.
25. NOTICES:
It is agreed that any t e a by this Policy
to be given to the in given by the INSURED
to the INSURANCE erwriting Agency, Inc. ,
11177 Merit Drive, 00, 1 a, Texas 75251.
16. CANCELLATIONAA
r Thia Policy cancelled by the NAMED INSURED or by the
Insurers, by ma' i or delivering to the other at the address
shown on the icy, stating when such cancellation shall be
effective.
`-� Cancellation by the insurers shall not be sooner than ninety (90)
days thereafter, unless such cancellation is for non-payment of
premium in which case coverage provided by this Policy shall
cease ton (10) days after written notice has been mailed or
delivered by the Insurers. The mailing or delivery of notice as
aforesaid, shall be sufficient proof of notice and the date and .
hour of cancellation stated in the notice shall terminate '
coverage under this policy.
Earned premium shall be computed pro rate and unearned premium,
if any, shall be returned to the NAMED INSURED as aocn as
practicable. in the event of cancellation of the Policy by the
NAMED INSURED prior to the completion of the project, the earned
premium shall be computed in accordance with the customary short
rate table and subject to the minimum earned premium stated on
the Declarations Page.
Cancellation shall not affect coverage on any shipment in transit
on the data of cancellation. coverage will continue in full
force until such property is delivered and accepted.
06192
f I. GENERAL STATEMENT
As cost control is a major concern for the Districts, contractor is instructed to quote Course of
Construction described below as a separate line item, which will be deducted if the Districts
elect to provide the Course of Construction coverage.
H. COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION INSURANCE
1) Contractor shall provide a separate line item quote for "all-risk"
,r course of construction insurance naming as the insured the interests
of the owner/districts and all contractors/sub-contractors, as their
interests may appear, in all property materials which will become
a part of the entire structure at one hundred percent (100%) of the
replacement value. Policy deductible shall not exceed $10,000.
2) The contractor responsible to provide as part of this policy
coverage for the perils of earthquake and flood. Earthquake
deductible shall not exceed 5% of the value at risk at the time of
the loss. Flood deductible shall not exceed $50,000.
A) Earthquake Limit $10,000,000
`.. B) Flood Limit $10,000,000
3) The course of construction policy will exclude contractor's
equipment, tools, appliances and other property owned, rented or
used by the contractor which does not become a part of the
completed structure.
4) At its sole option, the Districts may elect to provide the course of
construction coverage as described above. If such option is
exercised the contractor will credit the Districts' account with the
line item amount listed for course of construction coverage.
.. 5) If the Owner/Districts provides coverage, the contractor will be
responsible for a deductible amount $10,000 on each and every
loss except for the perils of Earthquake and Flood which the
District will assume.
r
rT 3101/93-CWOC\CRS-CSTR.ITT
r
EVIDENCE OF PROPERTY INSURANCE DAM
�03/02/93
THIS IS EVIDENCE THAT INSURANCE AS IDENTIFIED BELOW HAS BEEN ISSUED. IS IN FORCE.AND CONVEYS ALL
THE RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES AFFORDED UNDER THE POLICY.
_. woueEn cosrrar
ROBERT F. DRIVER ASSOCIATES Zurich Insurance Company
a� 3636 BIRCH STREET #230
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
(714) 756-0271
Dole W&COOE
uexmen Eons ease suaaFa
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
r P.O. Box 8127 ET An laaoa+n
Fountain Valley, CA 92728 oaEav�a
ma xEsucea wem EeDDxe ouEo:
PROPERTY INFORMATION
LOcenDaoE6lAVMn AS RESPECTS:
Project address and description.
i
COVERAGE INFORMATION
� <YOOxr Of DellRelOE oFOUCna1E
1 "All Risk' Builder's Risk and Earthquake and Flood. t15.000,000 ' See Below
eductible: $10,000 All Other Perils
$50,000 Flood
5% of Total Values at risk at time of lose for
Earthquake. $100,000 minimum applies.
i
! REMARKS(including Special ConORlmm)
Sublimits:
S10,000,000 Per Occurrence and Aggregate Earthquake
r $10,000,000 Per Occurrence and Aggregate Flood
$500,000 Transit
$500,000 Offaite Storage
$5,000,000 Debris Removal
$250,000 Expediting Expense
$1,000,000 Extra Exnensa
.CANCELLATION
THE POLICY IS SUBJECT TO THE PREMIUMS. FORMS.AND RULES IN EFFECT FOR EACH POLICY PERIOD.
3S�O5
THE POLICY BE TERMINATED.THE COMPANY WILL GIVE THE ADDITIONAL INTEREST IDENTIFIED BELOW
WRITTEN NOTICE.AND WILL SEND NOTIFICATION OF ANY CHANGES TO THE POLICY THAT WOULD AFFECT THAT
INTEREST.IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS OR AS REQUIRED BY LAW.
ADDITIONAL INTEREST
'��wJ1E um,wORfn wNMe OvwrEeEeT
ntractor aoe'a'wEe , AOOInONALe D
LOSS MA E Oi Fn
sawiuee ac wunasof o assn or coenwr
I
rI
ACORD 2712/88)
` y�/YI93
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
� cH
County Sanaaaon Districts P.O.Box 127.10844 EIIIS Avenue
of Orange County,California Fountain valley,CA 9272MI27
,4 Telephone:(714)962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
APRIL 14, 1993 - 7:30 P.M.
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4
Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular
Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts:
(4)(a) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file Resolution No. 93-252
from the Board of Supervisors re change in appointment of active and
alternate representatives, as follows:
Districts Active Director Alternate Director
1,2,3 & 11 Roger R. Stanton William G. Steiner
5,6,7,13 & 14 William G. Steiner Roger R. Stanton
In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code
Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the
meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda
item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be
submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in
compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda
posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date.
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items:
(a) Consideration of items pertaining to Repairs and Modifications to
Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040
(1) Verbal report of Staff
(2) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated
April 8, 1993 (Copy attached)
(3) Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to issue a
�J purchase order to Sur-Lite Corporation in an amount not to
exceed $129,400.00 for Repairs and Modifications to Flares at
Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040
` COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
01 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
k
April 8, 1993 1a Buy%se VENUE
PC FOUWA N VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92729-9127
p1A1952.2A11
STAFF REPORT
Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants 1 and 2.
Specification No. R-040
At both treatment plants, the Districts have installed flares for the burning
of excess digester gas in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) operating requirements. This gas, a byproduct of the sewage
treatment process, will be the fuel used in our new Central Power Generation
project. After Central Power Generation is operational, the flares will only be
needed for standby, to burn the gas if Central Power Generation facilities are off
line.
The flares were installed under several contracts. The most recent,
completed in January, included four new flares. They were purchased separately
from the manufacturer by the Districts and installed by a construction contractor.
In total, the Districts operate six flares, three at each plant, all manufactured by
Sur-Lite Corporation of Santa Fe Springs, California, which is the only commercial
manufacturer approved by SCAQMD to meet the stringent standards of "best
available control technology" established for flaring wastewater treatment plant
digester gas. The Districts received permits to construct (PTC) from SCAQMD to
construct the flare systems. They had been operating successfully in a trial period;
however, recent emission testing performed to confirm compliance with SCAQMD
requirements have shown that the flares are exceeding the permitted emission level
of oxides of nitrogen, an air pollutant that contributes to smog formation.
The two flares tested (one at each plant) were inspected by the
manufacturer, who discovered that the burners were deformed by high heat. In
order to preclude the issuance of a notice of violation by SCAQMD, staff
immediately filed for a variance under the SCAQMD "breakdown" rule. The
variance was granted for 30 days effective, Monday, March 15.
On an emergency basis, staff issued a purchase agreement under its
procurement authority for replacement burners from Sur-Lite for two flares (one at
each plant), at a cost of approximately $25,000. With the purchase agreement the
flare manufacturer (Sur-Lite) also agreed to investigate and define the cause of
extreme temperature conditions currently being experienced that apparently
damaged the flares, and to make appropriate recommendations for a remedy.
Sur-Lite has completed their investigation and made substantial
i modifications to the flare at each plant that had failed the test. Among other
problems, staff believes that the original design and control mechanisms for the
flares may not have been satisfactory. (These were not furnished by Sur-Lite.)
�...� The control system for the flares is very complicated, at best, and an inexact,
cutting-edge technology. Because our use of the digester gas is highly valuable
today, depending upon how many of our existing engines and boilers are operating,
the gas flow conditions that the flares and their controllers must face are highly
variable. Because of these wide ranging conditions, the Districts had been
operating the flares with a higher temperature to ensure that the SCAQMD
minimum temperature requirement of 14000 F would not be violated. This may
have contributed to burner problems. The high temperatures have now been
lowered due to reconfiguration of the flares and changes to the flare operating
parameters. Emission tests have been performed on the two modified flares and,
as of this writing, the flare at Plant 2 has passed. The Plant 1 flare has yet to
pass, possibly because of control problems. Sur-Lite will continue to investigate,
define and correct the problem with the Plant 1 flare and conduct a re-test.
Sur-Lite recommends that the remaining four flares be inspected and any
damaged burners be replaced and the flares modified to match the Plant 2 flare
which is now in compliance. These modifications include a new burner
configuration with more burners and relocation of temperature-sensing
thermocouples. Additionally, Sur-Lite recommends the addition of two more
thermocouples at each flare and changes to the control program.
Staff believes Sur-Lite is best qualified to make the required inspections
and repairs because of their experience in the design of these flares. Actual costs
will not be known until the inspections and repairs are complete; however, full
burner replacement and necessary control modifications (not a part of the original
Sur-Lite purchase order) should not exceed $115,000. Also, staff recommends
that Sur-Lite perform monthly inspections, in an additional amount not to exceed
$600 per month, to ensure that the flares remain in adequate operating condition
to achieve consistent long-term compliance with SCAQMD's operating
requirements. This price includes a substantial discount to the Districts as
compensation for experiencing the above problems. However, Sur-Lite has not
been requested to pay the entire repair and replacement cost because the higher
temperatures and other control changes made by the Districts may also have
contributed to the flare problems.
Staff recommends authorization to issue a purchase order to Sur-Lite
Corporation for Repairs and Modifications to Flares at Plants 1 and 2, Specification
No. R-040, in an amount not to exceed $115,000.00 plus $600 per month for
monthly inspection for up to a two-year period, for a total amount not to exceed
$129,400.00 plus tax. Staff is applying for an extension of the operating variance
provided by SCAQMD to allow time to repair the remaining flares.
wpEoc\en9\R-000\000893.er
-2-
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
4-28-93
1 ► Presentation of Plaque and Resolution to Retiring
Supervisor/Director Don R. Roth.
2) Upcoming Meetings
A. Fiscal Policy Committee - The Fiscal Policy
Committee is scheduled to meet
on Wednesday. April 21 st. at 5:30 p.m.
B. Conservation, Recycle & Reuse Committee -
The Conservation, Recycle & Reuse Committee is
scheduled to meet on Tuesday. April 27th.
at 11 :30 a.m. at SCAQMD offices in Diamond Bar.
C. Executive Committee - The Executive Committee is
scheduled to meet on Wednesday, April 28th,
at 5:30 p.m.
Invite two of the following Directors to attend and
participate in the discussions:
Barry Hammond and Frank Laszlo
-or-
Victor Leipzig or Tom Lutz
-Item 2 Continued on Next Page-
—� D. Personnel Commmittee - The Personnel Committee
is scheduled to meet on Thursday. April 29th, at
5:30 p.m.
- End of Report -
w pd o c\g m\jcrpt s93\jc04.01
MErnNGDATE 04/14/93 Tw1E 7:30 P.M. owns rs 1,2,3,5,6,7, 11, 13 S 14
DISTRICT 1 Nel#03 IJOINTER BOARDS
ILURI ....... RKSIAADSON ... meIBEYERI . ... ..... BAMEM .....
IBEYEPI ...... BARREM ...... ,0 IDENESI HAUN .... BELL . ....... ✓
IPEAOEI . ..... RDBWMAN .... JL IscoU......... GRN ......
IPormousl.... SALTaREw .... scorn ......... mums ..... JC —
ISTEINERI ..... 6TANTON ..... IOESA. ......... COX —........ .�
(NELSONS ....... DEBAY....... J� _
DISTIIICf 2 )f FRIM .NI ........ BBNMR...... A� _
IOULTn . . .MSONI ... WEDAA ....... r IRICD ........... EVANPERRY AN ... � —
(S R) . . . .. . COLLNS ...... AL IPEAOEI ......... RORA ... . —
IBEYEPI ...... BARKER....... JL IMAHONEVI....... ROM ....... JL
IDENES) ...... BELL ......... JG IBROWNI......... GROFIN ...... J/ _
IMcCIANAHAJ4. GTLM ....... 1L IWEDAAI .. OULLaSOIL ... —
IFLOMI .. MAHOMEV ..... 40-0 (WARM . .. MMMOND
(ECKENRODS .. MINUEND.MARIA gC (Cox) .. . . . .... .. HART. . ...... _
(PARKER) ..... NELSON....... .Mev IAOE1 . . . . .
... ... KEPPY ....... —
WALYI ....... POPULAR....... L (FORSYTHE) ...... U1ZBL0 ......
(LUTZ) ....... . . ISILVAI . .. .
S II ..... M (RIOIA ...... FP
ISDIGER( ...... KLAKET . . . . . .. �/ (FLOR I .. ....... MAH2 10N EY...........
(UNNI ..... ...... MWER ..
DISTRIff] IECKENRODEI ..... MORENO. MMRI
A..
/(AARTINE .... AHEN . ...... Al PULDO) . . ....... MORENO.TIED A —
IIMIMEeLG90AMMI N.N..II..... IY ....... . [PARADE ........ NELSON ...................
GRN ....... . (OUNILAR PARKER
(SCOTn ...... COLLINS .... MALY) .......... PNXA ....
.
RICE)RICE) ........ EN ( UCMTn .. PONnOUS
MAHONM.... IALTARELLO . .. PAD ELT
GRN ....... &U Z) ........ MILBIB ......ROWI....IAGE)
—
_—_........ KERRY . ....... ..JG ILUTp .......... EwRARUSOLI _—
IFU HARDS ... LASZLO ....... : I (IDPOEBMATIO)US..I....... SANSO Ew .::GHCHaRDSOM LUTE ......... Y ....... SANE ..
ILINNI . .. ..... M01ER ........ (MAPTNES....... SAPMN ....
(DALYI ... ... %OILER ....... IROBrtAIIw ...... SttVA ....
(POBITAILLEI ... SILVA ........ _ RLAKETI ........ MGM ......
RIAKETI .. SINGER ....... JL ISTENM ........ STANTON .... ��
ISTENERI . ... . STANTON ..... J/ ISTANTONI ....... STEINEP......
IBATESI . .. . .. SYLVIA . ... ... JL IMILLERI ......... SWAN . .....
IBATESI ......... 6YLVU ..::
DISTRICTS IPEPMISOM ..7 . WAHNEP ...
IDEMYI .... .. SCOXAN ✓ N IOULLMSON) ...... WEDAA .. . —_
IDEMYI . .. . STET .. T ISINGM..ROBITAIE ...... WINO(ELL ..
ISTANTONI . . . . STEINEP....... � � (SINGES ......... ZIAKET .....
r STAFF OTHERS
DISTRICT. ... . . . WANNER ...... IP SY�TER . JL �M.
ICOKI ... . . . . . HART......... .e BROWN....— ANWAR(STANTON) . . . . STENER....... .L ANDERSON . j DEMO( ....
CLAWSON-JL REENaw...
DISTRICT T DAWES...._,f MHSIER .. _
ISALTARELUI .. PULKETT ...... ✓ GORCZYCA .JL HOUGH....
MSENSTAS HOWARD .. _
(SCHER) ... WAHNEfl . . .. . . HODGES ... NUM ..... .
:SANSO . . . . . . MPIIEM . . .. . .
WARD)
. . . . DE BAY. . . . . . . . UNDER
" LEE . " " ��
AVARDI . ... .. HORENO, . . LINGER ....�- LEE . ROM
IPULD01 . ... .. MOPENO,TED . . �� ti NELLOP ...AZ LYNCH .OM
ISTANTON) .. .. STENER. ...... NICHOLS...� LYNCH .... _
DOTER .. SHAW _
DISTRICT 11 SIIMPSO OUNO....
IROBITAILLEI ... WNCHELL ..... . TREE VINCED ...
. . .
N STEINERI . . . .. STANTON ..... WN,SO,R.•�..,,M, %pi^ p�
CA44�
I E ..... OULLC(S ..
ISERI .... PRKR.k ......
DUNLA ..... PP .......
(DALY) ... . . . . PICKUP
F/^•^�{rF
....... l
ISTANTONI ... . STEINER....... . / ro- '-
DISTRICT 1A IVAI I"^�
IMILLEPI .. . ... SWAN . . ...... We
IP ER) . . .. . PGNTIDUB ... _
IBAM) . . . . . . HAAMMONMOND ....
......
(STANTON) . . _
STANT . . . . BTFINEP....... . 6/10/93
REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARDS ON SPECIFIC AGENDA ITEMS
OR MATTERS OF GENERAL INTEREST SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS FORM
TO THE BOARD SECRETARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BOARD MEETING.
AS DETERMINED BY THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKERS MAY BE DEFERRED UNTIL THE
SPECIFIC ITEM IS TAKEN FOR DISCUSSION AND REMARKS MAY BE LIMITED TO
FIVE MINUT/EESS. 4 .}-
DATE: - I — i AGENDA ITEM NO.
NAME: (PLEASE PRINT) /�U M1C/�'�
HOME ADDRESS: �3 U J Wl �N �I�� D L
(NUMBER STREET)
B -H . CA q(o21l
(CITY ZIP CODE
TELEPHONE: LZI-j3 co 5-3i� (o-7 rr7
REPRESENTING: 5LtSE�
(SELF OR NAME OF ORGANIZATION)
F28A
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
April 14 , 1993 BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
Please Print Please Print
6hG ARD czuk K S DE✓eL0FtlQJ T
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
100U ELLI9 AVENUE
AO SOX B127
FOUNI.N VLL Y.GUFOANN 92MA127
n1n 9624A11
March 18, 1993
STAFF REPORT
UPDATE ON THE DISTRICTS' PUBLIC NOTIFICATION PROGRAM
REQUIRED BY AB 2588 (THE TOXIC NOT SPOTS INFORMATION AND
ASSESSMENT ACT)
BACKGROUND
The Toxic Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act (AB 2588) was
adopted by the California Legislature in 1987. AS 2588 required
specified facilities to inventory and report their emissions of
toxic compounds to the regional Air Quality Management Districts.
Facilities with emissions determined to be significant were
required to perform a health risk assessment to assess their
impact, if any, on the adjacent community and workers. Owners of
facilities where the theoretical risk is determined to be
significant, are required to notify the affected residents.
The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) are
subject to AS 2588 and complied by submitting an emissions
inventory report to the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) . The Districts then volunteered to perform a
health risk assessment to determine any impact of our emissions
on the community. The results of our studies, which were
submitted to SCAQMD in May of 1991, indicate that certain
residents surrounding our two treatment plants (a total of
approximately 300 houses) , have a theoretical risk of contracting
cancer greater than 30-in-a-million, which is the potential
impact threshold established by SCAQMD.
At the October 28, 1992, Executive Committee Meeting, Staff
informed the Directors about the October 2, 1992, adoption of the
AS 2588 public notification guidelines by the SCAQMD Board of
Directors; and about the requirements to notify the impacted
community about the results of our health risk assessment reports
which were prepared for each treatment plant in 1990. The 300t
homes that may be impacted includes households in Huntington
Beach, across the street from Plant No. 2 on Brookhurst, and
households in Costa Mesa which are on the east side of the Santa
Ana River, across from Plant No. 1 (see attached maps) . No
households in Fountain Valley or Newport Beach are within the 10-
in-a-million theoretical risk level and we, therefore, have no
notification obligations under AS 2588.
Staff Report: Public Notification Program
March 18, 1993
Page 2 of 3
The adopted SCAQMD guidelines require owners of facilities that
pose a theoretical risk to the community of 10-in-a-million to
send a public notification letter to affected residents which
will be written by SCAQMD and distributed by the facility. In
addition, public meetings must be held for those residents in the
affected community to communicate the results of the health risk
assessment reports, provide any additional relevant information,
answer questions, and receive community input. SCAQMD staff will
monitor the public meetings and will also be available to answer
questions.
The SCAQMD guidelines give affected facilities' owners the option
to send a separate letter with the SCAQMD notice to communicate
any additional information that they feel is necessary. However,
SCAQMD reserves the right to review and approve any such letter
that is sent with their notice.
In October 1992, the Executive Committee authorized and directed
staff to prepare a facility letter for distribution. The
Executive Committee expressed interest in reviewing the letter
before it was sent out if the notification schedule would allow
it.
STATUS OF PUBLIC NOTIFICATION LETTER
AND PUBLIC MEETING:
We cannot provide the notification letters and hold the public
notification meetings until SCAQMD has approved our health risk
assessment reports which we submitted to them in May 1991. To
date, our reports have not been approved. However, we expect
this to occur soon because other industries have recently
received approval of their health risk assessments. We are
obligated to conduct the public meetings 30-days after our
reports have been approved.
In preparation for the public meetings, staff has developed
presentation materials on the results of our air toxic emissions
testing and health risk assessments. A modified version of this
presentation has been given to Districts' employees. The
employee presentations have provided staff with valuable feedback
that will be used to prepare the presentations to the public.
Staff is also proposing to give separate presentations to key
staff for the cities of Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley,
Costa Mesa and Newport Beach.
Staff Report: Public Notification Program
March 18, 1993
...i Page 3 of 3
STATUS OF NOTIFICATION
SCAQMD, at its September Board of Directors meeting, provided a
draft of their proposed public notification letter that will be
distributed to residents by the impacted facilities (copy
attached) . However, this letter is only a draft, and to date,
has not been finalized. Based upon SCAQMDs' draft notification
letter, staff has prepared a draft of the proposed Districts'
letter for review and comment by the Directors (copy attached) .
Staff's purpose for the facility letter is to provide
supplemental information to the community about who we are, what
we do, how the risk we pose compares to other everyday risks,
what we have done to control air emissions, and what we plan to
do to reduce emissions in the future.
The date of mailing and public meetings will be fixed once Air
Quality Management Districts approves the health risk assessment
and directs us to distribute the notice.
EMT:dk
Attachments
Ref#:340042 .rp
South Coast
AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
21865 E Copley Dnve, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 (714) 396-2000
PROPOSED SAMPLE NOTIFICATION LETTER
[date]
Dear Neighbor.
Under state law known as the Air Toxia "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment
Act of 1987 (AB 2588), some facilities identified by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (District) are required to inform their neighboring area of
potential health risks associated with the facility's routine emissions of toxic air
pollutants.
This letter is to inform you that [facility name], located at [facility address],
releases compounds which in sufficient quantities may cause potential health effects.
Other homes or businesses in your general neighborhood (as shown in the attached
map) are also receiving this letter. Receipt of this letter does not mean that this
facdity is in violation of any District rules.
As part of its routine operations, [facility name] [uses and] emits substances such as
[emitted substance(s)] into the air [to produce product or service]. Tbese emitted
substances are toxic air pollutants and your exposure to these substances may
increase your chance of [contracting cancer and/or experiencing health effects].
The estimated long-term risk is based on [facility name]'s [year] reported emissions
and the assumptions that: 1) exposure as a resident is 24 hours a day, 365 days per
year, for 70 years or, as a worker in the area, for 8-9 hours a day, 251 days per year,
for 40-46 years, and 2) exposure is at the point outside the facility where its emission
impacts are the greatest
<Based on these assumptions, your added risk of contracting cancer may be
increased by [ten, one hundred, one thousand,etc] but less than [upper limit based
on facility risk assessment rounded to nearest 10] chances in a million. If the above
assumptions for long-term exposure do not apply to and/or are different for you,
your risk of cancer could be lower, accordingly.
In order to give you an idea of different risk levels, the attached figure will provide
you with risks associated with other sources or activities for comparison. While
marry of these risk levels are rough estimates, we hope that it helps you to better
understand the cancer risk estimates.>
<Your long-term exposure to emissions from [facility name] may also increase the
possibility that you experience [state adverse chronic health effect(s)]. If the above
assumptions for long-term exposure do not apply to and/or are different for you,
your risk of these health effects could be lower, accordingly.>
<In addition, your short-term exposure to emissions from [facility name] may also
__ increase the possibility that you experience [state adverse acute health efrect(s)].
This statement assumes that you will be exposed to maximum emissions for
approximately one hour or more at the point outside the facility where its emission
impacts are the greatest If these conditions do not apply to and/or are different for
you,your risk could be lower, accordingly.>
As a result of measures voluntarily undertaken by the facility, required by District
rules, or due to other reasons, the facility's present air toxic emissions and resulting
potential health risk may be different than what is indicated in this notice. The
District as well as state and federal governments have many programs to reduce the
public's exposure to toxic air pollutants. In addition, data obtained through the AB
2588 program will be used to direct future development of rules and programs at the
District To find out more about these programs, please write or call the District at
the address provided below.
For more information regarding the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program, please refer to
the enclosed information sheet If you have additional questions regarding the
procedure or requirements for compliance with the state law for AB 2588, please
contact:
Toxics Branch/Stationary Source Compliance
SCAQMD
21865 East Copley Drive
Diamond Bar, California 91765
(714)396-3600.
The health risks mentioned in this notice are summarized in a document known as a
health risk assessment which is prepared by the facility and reviewed by the District and state health experts. The facility's health risk assessment document is available
for your review at the District headquarters library at the above address. If you
have questions related to the facility operations, please contact [facility contact
name] at [phone number].
If you are interested in attending a public meeting to discuss the information in this
letter or are interested in having a copy of the facility's health risk assessment
document placed at your local library, please fill out and return the enclosed
postcard.
Note: Businesses receiving this notice should post it in an area(s)where it is most
likely to be viewed and easily read by employees.
' N,ICs�1af�E�J: -This is A GQrn��(1y- .�(f,-� '
94 f[a MA. f/)nf�Gl 416�� -i- ma M^n loo' I�1y—.
fYO� �
Q iN � { -ra
. $A�i I��wiia� , ii '•; i •• n �l7 ,"e' tC n pa;•�-i • u ar �c
F $1, I�A. ' I •9�NN �•,� per • � '' iy
yyi� '�i ;t '> ur •• �:r'e� .. u-.._ M �^q�(�1��+` �,_Lf a q� • � _ m ',
fW,
�(A�•,: � e• AV 6 - If'j �9d MOIi M f.
;e 2 \ •d VALLEY 2
etvo
i-
`•N�,aS I < uw.tvll••x.i ' 1 ,a.,Mi I • � Jillrr
�,�,
G 1 � '•n G' • fi,
S'�y' �'a•, � / � i rFp �. AGs rr .L .I+"^I :, G.� � br. _� _ I �i� — �"_ . �
•l 6/; n _!`' • _ e% 1L..�m�ai ICgr 8 —9 _- J �._ "' off.
• �py��� 4 ,r.... � � 'a.P i I r,a sE $ e r
'lip N 4
: "7'.,1A .9n ••,-�',, a x `ya + _9 • yy r• . s ii
AN
A.� G,'I lli� . $ jl .. i , •.„g 11'�""tr d"G[i l�'I iAlev $
I!H ' $ae yMAP
�Added Lifetime Risk >
(per million people exposed)
Ambient
Am6MnI M1200
In-Cor . 72
Imtnr 220
F,
ON SIDO 3
,,oy 10 Gas Station 3
Maximum Individual Lifetime Cancer Risk 1500
1\
Facility 10
M \\
ADDED r.rx-ETEAF RISK
This figure depicts maximum individual lifetime cancer risks associated with four
environments: ambient, in-car, gas station and [facility name]. The actual risk at
any location ranges from zero to the maximum value presented.
Ambient
Ambient refers to the surrounding environment, specifically the air breathed in
daily. The California Air Resources Board and the District operate ten toxic air
monitoring stations throughout the South Coast Air Basin. Of these ten stations,
five complete data sets of air concentrations of select air pollutants have been
gathered. The maximum individual lifetime cancer risk from ambient air in the
South Coast Air Basin is calculated to range from 600 to 1,300 chances in a million
based on measured concentrations at these monitoring sites. The cancer risk
calculated assumes that the maximum exposed individual breathes measured
concentrations of ambient air continuously for 24 hours per day, 365 days per year,
and 70 years.
In-Car
In-car refers to the commuting environment, specifically the air breathed in while
driving a car. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the District
sponsored a study in 1989 to characterize the air in motor vehicles during one's
commute. The maximum individual lifetime cancer risk from air in a motor vehicle
during one's commute in the South Coast Air Basin is calculated to be 72 chances in
a million. The cancer risk calculated assumes that the maximum exposed individual
breathes the 1989 measured concentrations of commuter air continuously for the
entire commute, which is assumed to last 1 hour per day, 365 days per year, and 70
years.
Gas Station
Gas station refers to the re-fueling environment, specifically the air breathed in
while refueling a car at a gasoline station. The U.S. EPA and District sponsored a
study in 1990 to characterize the breathing zone of individuals refueling their
personal cars at self-serve gasoline stations. The maximum individual lifetime
cancer risk from air at a gasoline station while refueling one's car in the South Coast
Au Basin is calculated to be 3 chances in a million. The calculated cancer risk
assumes that the maximum exposed individual breathes the 1990 measured
concentrations associated with refueling a car continuously for the entire refueling
period, which is assumed to last 15 minutes per week, 52 weeks per year, and 70
years.
Facili
Facility refers to the surrounding environment, specifically the air breathed in while
living or working near [facility name] that emits specific substances into the air.
The state Au Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act (AB 2588)
requires all facilities emitting specific substances into the air to inventory their
emissions. The facility cancer risk calculated from these inventories assumes that
the individual breathes projected air concentrations continuously for 24 hour per
day, 365 days per year, and 70 years as a resident at a point outside the facility
_ where the facility's emission impacts are greatest.
DRAFT
DATE
Dear Neighbor,
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and
Assessment Act of 1987, the Orange County Sanitation Districts have conducted
a study to determine the theoretical health risks, if any, associated with air
emissions from our [Fountain Valley or Huntington Beach] treatment plant. The
purpose of our writing to you is to is to notify you of the results of that study. We
are pleased to inform you that the study results indicate that the risk level is
consistent with what regulators consider acceptable for our type of facility.
Enclosed is a legal notice from the South Coast Air Quality Management District
discussing the issue of air contaminants. Because legal notices can be difficult to
understand and may prompt additional questions, we are also providing you with
the enclosed pamphlet to help interpret what these air contaminants are, where
they come from, how health risk is determined, just what it means, and what we
do to reduce any air emissions from our treatment plant. We have also included a
general information pamphlet to provide you with more information about the
Sanitation Districts.
To learn even more about this issue, we encourage you to attend a community
gathering being held for your convenience on DATE at PLACE at TIME. This
meeting will also provide our staff with the opportunity to hear your views that will
help us plan and manage our facilities that are so vital to protecting public health
and the environment, and continue to be good neighbors.
If you are unable to attend this meeting, but would like more information, please
contact our Public Information Office at (714) 962-2411, ext. 2055.
DO AIR CONTAMINANTS POSE A HEALTH RISK?
"CLEARING THE AIR"
RISK ASSESSMENT STUDY RESULTS
BY THE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Who are the Orange County Sanitation Districts?
We are a public agency that manages the regional wastewater facilities that
collect, treat and safely dispose of wastewater and its residuals for 2.1 million
county residents and businesses. We have a treatment plant located in Fountain
Valley on Ellis Avenue at the San Diego Freeway, and one located in Huntington
Beach on Brookhurst Street near Pacific Coast Highway. Our sole mission is to
protect public health and the environment, including Orange County's precious
coastal water resources.
Why are we providing you with this information?
State law, AB2588, the "Air Toxic 'Hot Spots' Information and Assessment Act of
1987," directed many business and public facilities to conduct studies every two
years and determine the health risks associated with air contaminants and to
inform the Air Quality Management District (AQMD) and the public of the results.
The Sanitation Districts' first study was conducted in 1990 and submitted to the
AQMD for review in 1991 . The AQMD has now finished their evaluation of the
information and authorized it to be disseminated to the public.
Where do these air contaminants come from?
Air contaminants are released from the wastewater that comes from homes and
businesses just like yours. Some of them, like ammonia and hydrogen sulfide, are
inherent in wastewater. Others, like organic compounds and metal particles, come
mostly from industry, but some come from household products like cleaners,
1
solvents and paint. Another, chlorine, is added to your drinking water supply to
make it safe and it is also added at the wastewater treatment plant for disinfection
and to prevent odors.
Why are there treatment plant emissions?
Emissions are released at certain steps in the processing of wastewater, which is
done in accordance with strict federal and state regulations. Our multi-step
treatment process is similar to nature's way of cleaning wastewater. As we
remove and treat solid organic material from the wastewater, we use aeration or
other processes that cause turbulence. These processes cause some contaminants
in the water or solids to evaporate into the atmosphere. Some of the gas that is
produced during treatment of the solids is disposed of by burning which also
contributes to air emissions. Some is used as an energy source to operate the
plants.
What kind of air contaminants do the plants emit?
These emissions include volatile organic compounds, hydrogen sulfide, chlorine,
ammonia and possibly metal particles.
How are the health risks determined?
In most cases, scientists use data compiled from tests on laboratory animals and
then apply the numbers to humans using very conservative assumptions and
"factors of safety," to estimate the theoretical human risk of exposure. Because
scientists are uncertain whether humans would have the same health response to
chemicals as the laboratory animals, they use very conservative and protective
assumptions.
How can exposure to air emissions pose a health risk?
Laboratory tests on animals, and experiences in a limited number of industrial
settings, indicate that some emissions have the potential to pose immediate or
2
long-term health effects, including cancer. Possible contact can come from
breathing, touching or eating. But, the effects of exposure depends on many
factors including location relative to the source; the strength of the emission; how
long and how often a person is exposed to the source; and how sensitive one is
based on age and general health condition.
What kind of exposure is used to determine potential health risk?
Regulators use "maximum exposure" to calculate the health risk potential. A
person would receive maximum exposure if they were to stand in one place and
receive continuous exposure to a maximum concentration (breathing it, eating and
touching it) 24 hours a day for 365 days a year, for 70 years.
What do regulators consider as "acceptable risk?"
There is no consistent value agreed upon by health experts. The risk limits used by
local, state and federal agencies to establish human health protection regulations
range between 1-in-l-million to 100-in-1-million. The South Coast Air Quality
Management District considers a risk of less than 10-in-a-million acceptable for a
facility.
How do these health risks compare to everyday activities in Orange County7
Deaths over a 70-year lifetime
Smoking 84,000 in-l-million people
Alcohol 3,500 in-1-million people
Diagnostic Medical X-Rays 1,400 in-l-million people
4 tbsp/day peanut butter 700 in-l-million people
1 pt milk/day 140 in-1-million people
1/2 Ib/wk charcoal broiled steak 21 in-1-million people
3
Here are some other lifetime cancer risks associated with breathing air
across the entire South Coast Air Basin over 70-year lifetime.
Surrounding air - 1,300 in-l-million people
(24 hours, 365 days)
Commuting in car - 72 in-1-million people
1 hr/day, 365 days)
Refueling at a gas station - 1 in-l-million people
(15 min/wk, 52 wks/yr)
According to calculated estimates, what is the theoretical cancer risk from air
emissions from the treatment plants?
The theoretical risk of contracting cancer due to "maximum exposure" to air
contaminants from the treatment plant is 10-in-l-million people.
What about other health effects?
The risk of suffering non-cancer, immediate health effects (i.e., respiratory
problems) or long term health effects (damage to an organ or organ system) is ....
determined by a "Hazard Indicie, (HI)." The HI is a hypothetical risk calculation
using maximum exposure and coming up with a ratio when the exposure dosage is
divided by the safe dosage. A ratio equalling less than 1.0 is considered by
regulators to pose no health effects. The HI for those living around the treatment
plants is less than 0.32, which is 3 times lower than what is considered
acceptable.
What has been done to control air emissions from the plants?
In the past five years, the Sanitation Districts have spent more than $80 million on
plant improvements to control air emissions and odors. In addition, we have
significantly reduced the amount of toxic pollutants industry discharges into the
sewer system. Most of our treatment plant facilities are now enclosed or covered
to trap emissions, which are then processed through air scrubbers.
4
�./ We are also constructing Central Power Generation facilities that will replace 28
internal combustion engines with eight new, state-of-the-art, clean-burning engines
and electric motors, which will essentially eliminate the need to burn excess gas,
and we've installed more efficient gas-burning flares. These facility will
significantly reduce emissions of criteria pollutants such as oxides of nitrogen and
carbon monoxide.
What is being done to reduce air emissions in the future?
In addition to the capital improvement costs, we spend about $8 million a year on
air quality improvement measures. We are creating an Air Quality Risk Reduction
Program that will outline a long-term plan to further modify treatment facilities and
operational practices; enhance industrial source control efforts to reduce the
discharge from industry of toxic pollutants; and explore new technology. We have
a continuing commitment to install the best available technology on all new
treatment process.
Can we completely stop emissions?
No. We must continue to operate the treatment plant to provide essential
wastewater management services for Orange County to protect public health and
the environment. Unfortunately, there is no existing technology that can
completely remove all emissions. We do, however, build and operate our
treatment plants using state-of-the-art techniques.
Is there anything the public can do to help reduce contaminants from entering the
treatment plants?
Yes. Hazardous chemicals found in household cleaning supplies cannot be
removed during the treatment process and can eventually end up in the air. It is
important that you and your neighbors try to reduce the use of household
hazardous products and dispose of them safely. The first step is to shop wisely.
5
You can recognize hazardous materials by looking for key words on the label--
corrosive, flammable, reactive, or poison. Try to use less harmful or more natural
v
cleaning products like vinegar, borax, lemon, and baking soda.
For more information contact our Public Information Office at (714) 962-2411
extension 2055.
afeo�(ep e —�
to slooUDS (OMIT.
"r (9-ol) 4laldosl
WA z WN I w 005 0 (S-O[)
—J I spoiluao 0E'Zbb —
{l slomi snsuao
(IN3931
.01
-
e am
S_ol
n• != II �
n... j I •' _ r.
MVdWl dO 3NOZ 4 .ON 1NVld vo,,,img eum°°°°o
A,auo6,uoyy�y+ spuq
—77
i
i
01 `� •
I
� 5-
/
ai I ,• � n.uwe
I II \
JJ5 I
I
7�1
7i . p
y. a
I
ajeoAea I—
io siao4os
RU` WN 2 WN i 'W oos J
(s-OL) 4laldosl . — — — —
(s-ol.) 4laldosl L
f -
splojluao 0E'266 r
sioel1 snsuep C .
CIN3J3l r
I 1��
py 01
I
/ax 01 J
5- I
s01 �-
I.,
' C I �
I _
L- C
_ r�
638 . 07 J
' 638 .—���
638 . 08
�639. 06 '
\` � 2. 01
636 . 01 z 63�,` � `
---��- -�'� ,� 632. 02
'I
631 . 03
.6.36 ; 02
-5 �Cto ;
. 03 —
i
634 Y.IBs M.MYIIQO.Y1y
PLANT NO2 ZONE OF IMPACT
...u..c r FIGURE 5.1
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIfDRNIA
1CB40 ELLIS AVENUE
v0 90x 9121
FWNFAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92]29412]
71AI992.2A11
Match 18, 1993
STAFF REPORT
Biofiltration Demonstration Project
OVERVIEW
Last November, the Boards authorized staff to conduct a
Biofiltration Demonstration Project to study the feasibility of
biofiltration to remove toxic, volatile organic, and odorous air
emissions from our treatment plants. The estimated cost of the
demonstration project is $280,000.
In November, staff had communicated to the Directors that other
parties may be interested in co-funding this research project,
including the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) and the Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) .
Approval was given to enter into grant contracts with both SCAQMD
($124,568) and WERF ($30,000) , along with authorization to
contract with others that will be working with the Districts on
this project. Subsequently, Southern California Edison (SCE) has
also expressed an interest in providing some funding. However,
staff did not then have firm commitments from any of the
potential funding participants. Because of that, staff also
indicated that they would report back to the Directors after
receiving notice from WERF and SCAQMD prior to proceeding with
the project, and that authorization would be requested to enter
into a grant agreement with SCE if SCE decided to provide some
funding to this project.
The purpose of this staff report is to update the Directors on
the status of grant negotiations with SCAQMD, WERF, and SCE; to
request authorization to proceed with the research; and to
request authorization to execute a specific term employment
agreement with Shabbir Basrai to assist the Air Quality Division
in accomplishing the research efforts.
Staff Report: Biofiltration Demonstration Project
March 18, 1993
Page 2 of 5
SCOPE OF RESEARCH
The research work consists of five tasks, as follows:
1. Task I - Review of literature on biofiltration.
2 . Task II - Development of experimental protocols.
3 . Task III - Testing of bench scale biofilters.
4 . Task IV - Testing of pilot scale biofilters.
5. Task V - Conceptual design of full-scale biofilter.
STATUS OF FUNDING PARTICIPANTS
The SCAQMD Board of Directors formally approved funding
participation in our research project at their December Board
meeting in the amount of $125, 000. Discussions with SCAQMD staff
indicate that we should have a contract in place by the first
week in April. WERF's research council formally approved our
research project in the amount of $30,000, at their November
meeting. Conversations with WERF staff indicate that we should
have a contract in place by April 15, 1993 . Districts' staff
have met with SCE staff several times to work out the terms of a
contractual agreement. SCE expects to contract with the
Districts by mid-April in an amount of $50,000. To date,
however, no contracts have been signed with any of the funding
participants due to their internal delays in processing contracts
and our ongoing attempts to finalize contract language.
The current proposal for the demonstration project funding is
compared below with November's proposal:
DEMONSTRATION PROJECT FUNDING
CURRENT NOVEMBER
SOURCE PROPOSAL PROPOSAL
SCAQMD $125, 000 $124, 568
WERF 30, 000 30,000
SCE 50, 000 -0-
Sanitation
Districts 75.000 125.432
TOTAL $280,000 $280,000
Staff Report: Biofiltration Demonstration Project
March 18, 1993
+ Page 3 of 5
RECOMMENDATION TO PROCEED WITH PROJECT
Although the grant agreements have not yet been finalized, we do
have verbal commitments. Staff, therefore, recommends that the
Biofiltration Demonstration Project proceed pending the
finalization of the research grants for the following reasons:
1. The 1990 Federal Clean Air Act, requires that EPA develop
air toxic control performance criteria for municipal
wastewater treatment plants by 1995. The Districts, along
with a small handful of other wastewater agencies, are
moving forward with original research to have a factual
basis for establishing performance criteria, because it is
better to have the facts at hand when we deal with EPA on
these cutting edge issues in order to best make our case for
rational standards. If we do not begin the project soon, we
will not have the information we seek in time to effectively
use it in arguing our position with the regulators.
2. SCAQMD, WERF, and SCE have all committed through either
resolution by their governing Board, or other action to co-
fund the project.
3 . The inherent bureaucratic procedures of the three co-funding
participants has resulted in delays in establishing the
project contracts (our original anticipated contract start
date was January 1, 1993) . Further delays are possible,
with each of the three parties funding the project at
different times. Implementation of the project could be
delayed further if we wait for all parties to reach
agreement.
4. Research grant money from WERF and SCAQMD are on a calendar
year cycle. Further delays in implementing this research
could adversely impact our ability to obtain follow-up
research funding, since we would not have collected enough
data to develop a follow-up research proposal (full scale
demonstration of biofiltration) within the prescribed
funding cycle.
5. Several key workshops on biofiltration are planned for
April, May, and June of 1993. It is important that staff
attend these meetings which will be funded by the research
funds.
r
Staff Report: Biofiltration Demonstration Project
March 18, 1993
Page 4 of 5 .r
6. Last, but certainly not least, the potential capital and
operational savings to the Districts for air quality control
measures by influencing regulatory standard-setting based on
the successful outcome of research, such as this, are very
substantial; thus, justifying the research work regardless
of whether outside funding participation is available.
REQUEST TO HIRE SPECIFIC TERM EMPLOYEE
When the proposed biofiltration project was first presented to
the Directors for consideration, staff estimated that 1,100
manhours would be required to accomplish the work. Staff felt
that the work could be accomplished concurrently with their other
air quality management responsibilities using existing staff
resources. However, two factors have arisen that may prevent
staff from meeting its obligations under the research grant with
existing personnel. The first is the level of data collection,
Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) , and reporting expected
by the co-funding participants exceeds that which was originally
anticipated by the Districts. We now estimate the labor hours
required to accomplish the project to be around 1,500 hours (an
increase of 36 percent) . Secondly, since our November report to �..i
the Directors, several new rules have either been adopted or are
being proposed by SCAQMD and the California Air Resources Board
that require Districts' staff to commit significant resources to
track, review, analyze, and work with SCAQMD and other POTWs
during rule implementation and/or development.
For these reasons, staff recommends that a specific-term contract
engineer be engaged to provide assistance to the Air Quality
Division for the research project. Upon completion of the
research, the person would be terminated.
The specific-term-contract engineer will work full time and
exclusively on the biofiltration project. Duties will include
collecting data, overseeing QA/QC, developing technical reports
and budget reports for the funding agencies, searching library
databases for literature and retrieving information, providing
technical input into the development of experiments,
administering subcontracts and contracts with the funding
participants, overseeing the testing programs for the biofilters,
and coordinating meetings with research participants.
Districts' staff has sought qualified candidates. The most
qualified candidate that staff interviewed is Shabbir S. Basrai.
Mr. Basrai is a chemical engineer who has been working in the air
pollution field for the past five years. His experience with
managing large air quality related projects, coupled with his
Staff Report: Biofiltration Demonstration Project
March 18, 1993
-+ Page 5 of 5
educational background in microbiology, qualify him for the
position and will minimize any "learning curve" he would
otherwise have to undergo to work effectively in this capacity.
Other candidates did not posses these qualifications.
Staff, therefore, recommends approval of a specific-term-
employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for a 12 month
period, at an hourly rate of $21.63 per hour, for a total amount
not to exceed $45,000. Because the person would not be eligible
for typical employee benefits under the terms of the specific-
term-employment agreement, the added manhours required can be
absorbed by the original budget amount of $280,000.
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Amend authorization of November 18, 1993, authorizing staff to
conduct Biofiltration Demonstration Project to add the following:
1. Authorize the General Manager to execute a grant
.�. agreement with the Southern California Edison Company
for partial funding of the Biofiltration Project in the
amount of $50,000.
2. Authorize the General Manager to execute a specific-
term-employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for
engineering services for up to a twelve (12) month
period, at a hourly rate for total compensation of
$21.63 per hour, for a maximum amount not to exceed
$45,000.
Staff also recommends that the Directors authorize the
Biofiltration Demonstration to immediately proceed pending
execution of the grand funding participation agreements.
EMT:dk
Ref#340037 .rp
e
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
- RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 'OBAAKLIS."EN°E
PC BOX 8127
FW WAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92729-8127
March 18, 1993 711I962-2411
REPORT OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: March 18. 1993 -- 5:30 p.m.
COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
James A. Wahner, Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Fred Barrera Thomas M. Dawes, Director of
Bob Bell Engineering
John Collins Roger Carrillo, Staff Architect
Jan Debay
James H. Flora
Don R. Griffin
Gail Kerry
Thomas E. Lutz
Eva Miner
�../ Carrey Nelson
Sheldon S. Singer
Charles Sylvia
George L. Zlaket
Absent:
Barry Hammond
Miguel Pulido
Jim Silva
1. Review of the Buildina Committee's Resoonsibilities and Recent Activities.
For the benefit of new Committee Members the General Manager
summarized the committee responsibilities and recent activities. The Building
Committee was formed by the Boards of Directors to provide guidance and
direction for planning and construction of nontreatment plant facilities. These
generally include office buildings, shops, warehouses, laboratories, security and
landscaping. The Districts attempt to locate these facilities on the plant perimeter
and give special attention to architectural treatment so that they help screen the
�..i treatment facilities and provide a pleasant structure, as well as landscaping, that
Report of the Building Committee
March 18, 1993
Page Two
blends into the surrounding community. The General Manager also summarized the
major elements of the Districts 30-Year Wastewater Management Action Plan,
"2020 Vision" for the Directors.
In recent years, the Committee has overseen the remodeling and
enlargement of the administrative facilities, the new Control Center at Plant No. 1,
and our new Central Laboratory at Plant No. 1, as well as some eight separate
shop additions. Also, at Plant No. 2 a contract has recently been awarded for the
enlargement of that Operations Center and work is expected to start soon.
At the March Board Meeting, the Directors accepted as complete the new
Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building across from our new Central
Laboratory at Plant No. 1. Yet to be completed are four other associated contracts
that will provide the necessary interior furnishings and computer equipment. All of
those contracts, including the installation of our new central computer system, the
telemetry system for our outlying pumping stations, and installation of interior
partitioning and furniture have been awarded and are expected to be completed
soon.
2. Proposed Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Specification
No. M-044.
For many years the Districts have utilized office trailers for temporary
quarters until permanent office space could be built; or for activities that are
considered somewhat transient in nature, such as the construction management
offices. We periodically relocate our construction management offices to an area
that is close to the major upcoming construction work.
This project is the relocation of thirteen existing office trailers located at both
treatment plants to new uses. Several of the trailers are located adjacent to the
old laboratory and are proposed to be relocated to new uses at both Plant
No. 1 and Plant No. 2. Source Control inspectors are moving into recently
completed facilities near our shop, and two trailers previously used by that group
located in the south central portion of the plant are proposed to be relocated to
Plant No. 2. Finally, our construction trailers at Plant No. 2 are proposed to be
relocated to other uses to clear the way for the construction of our new
Maintenance Building and Warehouse.
-2-
Report of the Building Committee
March 18, 1993
�--..E Page Three
At the meeting, staff provided plans to show the intended new uses. At
Plant No. 2 about half of the trailers will be used to upgrade and relocate the
Construction Management office at Plant No. 2. The existing Plant No. 2
Construction Management office is housed in trailers, most of which are sixteen
years old and in need of repair. Staff is proposing that all of the trailers be reused
within the plant interior, some for storage of materials.
The estimated cost for the trailer relocation, utility hookups, and paving at
the new sites for the trailers is $150,000.00.
Recommendation
The Committee recommends approval of the plans and specifications for
Office Trailer Relocations at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, and
authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for said project.
3. Status Report on Preparation of Plans and Specifications for the Construction
�./ of Maintenance Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-2. and Warehouse
Building at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-35-3.
The Committee has previously approved the location, architectural
treatment, and size for these new facilities. The Maintenance Building at Plant
No. 2 is a 29,750 square foot facility located just south of the main entrance,
adjacent to Brookhurst Street. The Warehouse facility, at 29,600 square feet, is
located on the southwesterly corner of the plant boundary near Brookhurst Street.
The estimated cost of the Maintenance Building is $3,500,000 and the Warehouse
Building is $4,000,000. Staff reported that the plans are approximately 80 percent
complete and that they would be ready for submittal to the City of Huntington
Beach for plan checking in about four months.
4. Status Report on Additional Building Committee Projects.
A. Reclamation Plant No. 1.
Personnel Office: The Districts Personnel Office is currently housed in
trailers until a new Personnel Building is designed and built. Brown and
Caldwell, as part of a larger professional services contract awarded a few
years ago for the design of several support facilities, began preliminary work
-3-
Report of the Building Committee -
March 18, 1993
Page Four
on the building. Last year work was suspended as part of an addendum to
the Brown and Caldwell contract. New layouts are being prepared by staff
for consideration and approval prior to commencing final design.
Demolition of Old Laboratory for Administration Office Annex: Staff
reported that plans and specifications for the demolition of the old laboratory
are about 50 percent complete. This site will be used in the future for the
Administration Building annex to house the Technical Services Divisions
which are not in the new laboratory, and the Management Information
Services Division. The long-term plan calls for moving most of the Technical
Services Department into the new building, estimated at about 18,000
square feet.
B. Treatment Plant No. 2.
Security and Landscaping Requirements: A contract is in preparation
for additional landscaping and security improvements. It is expected that
these plans will be ready for Committee review next fall.
Demolition of Old Structures (Temporary Warehouse): Plans for
demolishing old structures, once the new Warehouse and Maintenance
Buildings are complete, should be ready in the Fall.
5. Status of Claim re Professional Services for Design of Administration Building
Addition. Job No. J-7-4.
The Committee previously directed Counsel to file claims against the
architect who prepared the plans and specifications for the Administration Building
Addition. Subsequently, a lawsuit was filed against the architect, Pulaski and
Arita Architects. Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering, updated the members on
the status of the lawsuit.
TMD:jt
wpAeden9leener4ne\W 199].hcr
-4-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
RE: AGENDA ITEM N0, 13 FI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
JOE44 EUUS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA M728-8127
`y all)S82-NIII
March 25, 1993
REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION. RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE
MEETING DATE: MARCH 25, 1993 - 5:30 PM
COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Pr n :
John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
John J. Collins Charles Egigian Nichols, Conservation, Recycle
Burnie Dunlap and Reuse Manager
James M. Ferryman Susan M. Bradford, Principal Environmental Specialist
Frank Laszlo Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations
Victor Leipzig
Ted R. Moreno
Carrey J. Nelson
Iry Pickier
Phil Sansone
Sal Sapien
Absen :
Maria Moreno
Glenn Parker
Leslie A. Pontious
Robert Richardson
Peer Swan
Henry W. Wedaa
1) DISTRICTS' ON-SITE RECYCLED WATER NEEDS
Reclaimed Water Pricing
Staff reported that pursuant to a 1972 agreement, the Districts have been
providing the Orange County Water District (OCWD) with treated secondary effluent at
no cost for use in their water recycling programs. The Districts' 1989 Master Plan
�EFi
Report of the Conservation, ,
Recycle and Reuse Committee
March 25, 1993 *.W
identified the demand for recycled water for operational needs at Plants No. 1 and No. 2
to meet a portion of our treatment plant operating water use requirements. Staff
reported on the most cost-effective manner to meet the Districts' recycled water needs
using the enclosed staff report (lavender) and enclosed discussion outline (white). Use
of recycled (tertiary) water for certain treatment plant processes is less costly than
potable water, will replace treatment plant (secondary) water, will ensure maximum
safety for the Districts' employees, and will help conserve water resources.
Staff summarized the Districts' Master Plan where it was assumed that recycled
water would be supplied by the OCWD Green Acres Project (GAP) at minimal cost and
the Districts would in turn supply the OCWD with secondary effluent for recycling
purposes. In December 1991, the Districts began receiving approximately 1.4 million
gallons per day (mgd) of GAP water from the OCWD. The Districts' recycled water
needs are expected to increase with expansion of Plant No. 1 and delivery of recycled
water to Plant No. 2. The Districts have been receiving GAP water pending a new
contract with the OCWD to define the terms and conditions of its acquisition.
For the reasons stated above, the 1972 agreement needs updating and the
Directors have previously given staff the following directives towards that end:
- Negotiate an agreement with the OCWD to provide secondary treated
effluent at no cost, provided that the price for GAP water to the Districts
not exceed the OCWD's best pricing to other customers.
- Include language in any agreement that acknowledges the changing nature
of water pricing and provides for modifications to the agreement to reflect
such changes and the change in cost and policy of providing secondary
treated effluent to the OCWD.
- Evaluate the option and cost of producing recycled water with on-site
Districts' facilities as an alternative to acquiring GAP water.
The Districts engaged a consultant to prepare a feasibility study for producing
recycled water on-site that would meet Department of Health Services standards, using
small, modular treatment plants and ultraviolet (UV) light disinfection. The present
worth cost for the on-site facilities is estimated at $7.6 million.
-2-
' Report of the Conservation,
Recycle and Reuse Committee
`-� March 25, 1993
The staff from both districts have negotiated a preliminary agreement on the price
of GAP water, wherein the Districts would only pay the audited O&M costs for the
amount of GAP water used by the Districts. Current O&M costs are approximately
$460.50 per million gallons ($150 per acre foot). Based upon the current OCWD price
proposal, the present worth cost for GAP water was estimated at $4.7 million in
comparison to $7.6 million for on-site facilities.
The terms of the contract negotiated with the OCWD for long-term supply of
GAP water also include a provision that the Districts would pay the audited O&M costs,
or the lowest price paid for GAP water by any other GAP customer, whichever is less.
In turn, the Districts will continue to provide the OCWD with treated secondary
water at no cost, provided that the issue of secondary water valuation and pricing can be
revisited at any time. Should the OCWD be unable to provide the Districts with GAP
water due to increased community demand for recycled water, then the OCWD will give
the Districts 24 months in which to complete on-site water recycling facilities.
The Committee reviewed in detail the assumptions used to complete the
economic analysis. It was noted that the analysis used a 4% inflation rate and that for
�..i the equal comparison of projects, the salvage value equalled zero after 20 years. If the
Districts were to complete its own on-site modular water recycling facility, it would not
be used to supply recycled water to customers off-site.
UV Light Disinfection Pilot Proigct
Both the Orange County Water District and the Sanitation Districts are interested
in maximizing the use of recycled water. To best achieve that goal, the chlorine residual
now present in GAP water needs to be reduced. Chlorine is currently used for
disinfecting GAP water. Staff from both districts are, therefore, recommending that a
joint pilot plant test be conducted to determine the feasibility of UV light disinfection in
lieu of chlorination for water and wastewater treatment processes.
Staff reviewed the information in the enclosed staff report (lavender) and the
Committee discussed UV disinfection pilot testing including successful demonstrations at
other facilities. Staff described that UV pilot testing is still a sufficiently new and
evolving technology that pilot testing is required to match the UV system to the Districts
unique secondary clarifier flow characteristics.
-3-
Report of the Conservation,
Recycle and Reuse Committee
March 25, 1993
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Committee recommends the following actions:
A) Authorize staff to complete negotiations for an agreement with the OCWD in
a form approved by the General Counsel that would: 1) provide up to 50 mgd of
secondary effluent to the OCWD for recycling purposes at no charge, with a provision to,
at any time, reevaluate the valuation and pricing for secondary effluent; and 2) provide
for purchase of GAP water for 20 years at the audited cost to operate and maintain the
GAP facility. (The current O&M cost is $460.50 per mg or $150 per AF). The contract
would provide that the Districts' cost would not exceed the O&M cost or the lowest cast
of any GAP customer, whichever is less.
B) Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with the OCWD for pilot plant
testing of UV light disinfection technology, with estimated $160,000 cost to be shared
equally in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the Districts' share of out-of-pocket costs
for outside consulting services, and $40,000 for the Districts' laboratory services.
2) UPDATE ON SITING FOR A WATER RECYCLING FACILITY
The 1989 Master Plan emphasizes the importance of water recycling to conserve
water resources. The 30-year Master Plan provides for construction and operation of up
to three new upstream wastewater recycling plants. Staff reviewed the enclosed staff
report (blue) providing a status update on continuing efforts to acquire sites for water
recycling plants.
The Committee discussed the status of activities on several sites including the
Waste Water Disposal Company site in Fullerton at State College Boulevard and
Orangethorpe, the Ball-Harbor site being surplused by Orange County General Services
Administration, the La Palma site near SR 57 and SR 91 in Anaheim, the Crescent
Basin site near I-5 and Brookhurst Avenue in Anaheim, and the State College
Boulevard-Winston Road site in Anaheim.
The Committee emphasized their support for continuing with water recycling site
acquisition, noting that land values are favorable for immediate purchase. In the
discussion that followed on project cost-effectiveness, staff emphasized that water
recycling facilities are costly, that water pricing is dynamic, and that historically water
pricing has been subsidized not market-based. Currently, the cost-effectiveness of water
-4- \./
Report of the Conservation,
Recycle and Reuse Committee
March 25, 1993
recycling is marginal. California is finally starting to move towards market-based water
pricing and eventually the cost curves will cross, but the Districts need to proceed
cautiously by obtaining guaranteed markets for recycled water prior to a major facility
undertaking.
3) OTHER BUSINESS
The Committee considered an invitation by Director Wedaa to visit the
headquarters of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for an
upcoming meeting. The meeting could provide the opportunity to inspect the
SCAQMD's laboratory and fuel cell facilities and discuss air quality management
matters. Staff was directed to determine alternative dates and times with SCAQMD for
such a meeting and poll the Committee on their availability.
CEN:gc
Attachments
Ref#330134.rp
-5-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
i W ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
March 18, 1993 119 ELUS AVENJE
" W.8'2]
FWNLIN VLLLEV,CALIF0"IA 92720-8121
..� n+u W2.241 1
STAFF REPORT
STATUS OF ANAHEIM FOREBAY WATER RECYCLING PLANT SITING
1) BACKGROUND
The Districts' 1989 Master Plan identifies increased water recycling as one of the
Districts' major programmatic goals. Several goals were adopted including construction
and operation of up to three new upstream water recycling plants. The Master Plan
assumes that these would be accomplished partly with the Orange County Water District.
Accordingly, there are numerous ongoing efforts pertaining to the Districts
acquisition of land in the Anaheim Forebay area. A minimum five acres is required for
up to a 10 million-gallon-per-day (mgd) facility. If a site can be acquired in the near
future, and allowing for permitting, design and construction of the facility of seven to ten
years, recycled water could be provided by the year 2000. The location of the sites under
consideration are shown in the attached Figure 1. The status of the six potential sites
�./ considered to date is given below.
2) WASTE WATER DISPOSAL COMPANY SITE
The Waste Water Disposal Company (WWDC) site, located near State College
Boulevard and Orangethorpe Avenue, is a 5.74 acre parcel located in Fullerton. Staff
has negotiated intermittently for the past two years with W WDC to determine the
purchase terms and conditions. Prior to reaching any agreement on the property, an
environmental assessment is required to determine if any soil contamination is present
from the oil waste operations that have occurred at this site for the past 60 years.
As authorized by the Boards a letter agreement prepared by counsel has been
executed by WWDC and the Districts reaffirming the Districts interest in this property
and the terms under which WWDC would conduct and pay for an environmental site
assessment. The agreement does not commit the Districts to purchase of the property or
any liability if the property is determined to be contaminated.
The site environmental assessment should be completed in two to three months.
The Districts' staff will be able to interact with the consultant during the assessment
process. Results of the environmental assessment will provide the Districts with
information necessary to determine the feasibility of this site for acquisition.
t
Staff Report
Status of Water Recycling Site Acquisition
March 18, 1993
3) BALL/HARBOR SITE
The Orange County General Services Agency (GSA) has a surplus parcel of 11.68
acres near the intersection of Ball Road and Harbor Boulevard in Anaheim (see
attached Figure 2). The Agricultural Commissioner's Sealer of Weights and Measures
buildings are located on a portion of this property. Approximately half of the parcel is
undeveloped and has been historically used for agricultural purposes. The GSA is
currently having the property appraised and will provide this information to the Districts
when available in the next two to three months. Staff has completed a preliminary
feasibility evaluation of the site.
In an overview sense, staff has determined that the property is feasible for a water
recycling facility of the size and scope desired by the Districts. The property was
evaluated using the characteristics developed for the past site studies including the
nature of the site, the water reuse market in the vicinity of the site, the socio-
environmental factors and costs.
The surrounding area is a blend of commercial and residential property. The
State College trunkline is approximately 1.5 miles from this site and would be the source
of wastewater for the water recycling facility. The Harbor/Ball site is within a four-mile
radius to approximately 37 potential recycled water users. Identified potential users
include parks, school yards, freeway greenscape, and some industries. This location is
also close to potential recycled water users such as the Disneyland, and Anaheim's
commercial/recreational areas, which includes the sports complex and stadium.
Anaheim also has a proposed "Garden District" landscape plan for certain streets. In the
past, the City of Anaheim has shown interest in siting of a reclamation plant in Anaheim
and the new City Hall building has been plumbed to receive recycled water.
The GSA property near Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road is located in an area
containing residential and commercial zoning. This site is closer to residential properties
than the other sites under consideration. There has been no contact with the public
regarding this site; however, staff is developing a public information and survey program
to determine the level of public acceptance for the proposed water recycling facility
siting. Environmental considerations include assessment of past agricultural practices
and their potential impact on the subsurface and groundwater.
The GSA desires to lease the property. Terms for a lease option are currently
being explored by the Districts and GSA. A draft lease has been provided by GSA to
the Districts' staff to determine the feasibility of a long-term lease and staff is currently
reviewing the lease with legal counsel.
-2-
Staff Report
Status of Water Recycling Site Acquisition
f March 18, 1993
Staff has had several meetings with GSA to determine the feasibility of siting a
water recycling plant at this location. GSA's staff has been highly motivated in helping
the Districts' staff determine the feasibility of siting a reclamation plant on this parcel.
Additional meetings with GSA are planned to continue site evaluation. Staff has
recently met with City of Anaheim to determine the city's level of support for siting of a
water recycling facility at this location. Staff from the city's planning department is
reviewing current and future land use in the area surrounding the Harbor/Ball site to
help determine feasibility of this parcel for a water recycling facility.
4) DISNEYLAND SITE
The Districts' staff has met with Disney Development Company (DDC) officials
several times in the past year to discuss the potential for delivery of recycled water to the
proposed theme park expansion. The Disneyland draft environmental impact report
identifies many potential uses for recycled water in their proposed theme park expansion.
Also discussed was the possibility of siting a water recycling facility on Disneyland's
property. No decision has been made yet by DDC concerning the potential siting of a
water recycling facility on Disney property. Staff will continue to monitor this with DDC
on a monthly basis for an update on their recycled water needs for the theme park
expansion.
5) LA PALMA SITE
Located near the intersection of State Route 57 and State Route 91 is the 15 acre
La Palma site in Anaheim. It is presently used for strawberry fields. In addition, there
are two oil wells on the site. High concentrations of total dissolved solids (TDS) in the
wastewater tributary to this site could require additional desalting of the recycled water
and increase the cost to produce recycled water. Additional monitoring of the TDS
levels in the adjacent Carbon Canyon Interceptor has been planned for March - April,
1993 to verify the wastewater quality.
6) CRESCENT BASIN SITE
The Crescent Basin site is a 10-acre parcel located near the Interstate 5 Freeway
and Brookhurst Avenue in Anaheim. This site is used for flood control purposes. The
County Environmental Management Agency (EMA) staff has reaffirmed the need to
retain flood control capacity down stream of this site, should it be used for a water
recycling facility. Costs for flood control channel improvements would be $6 to S7
million in addition to fair market value cost for the land. For these reasons and the fact
that this site is located to the west of most potential recycled water users, the Crescent
-3-
Staff Report
Status of Water Recycling Site Acquisition
March 18, 1993
Basin site is not a preferred site. Staff is requesting a letter from the EMA setting forth
their position on requiring the additional flood control improvements, should the
property be used for a water recycling facility.
7) ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION SITE
Staff met several times last year with representatives of Rockwell to determine
the feasibility of acquiring a five-to-ten acre parcel as Rockwell plans to downsize their
Anaheim operations complex. Rockwell officials have decided to retain the 200-acre
parcel; therefore, this location is no longer an option.
8) STATE COLLEGE/WINSTON ROAD SITE
A parcel at the corner of State College Boulevard and Winston Road in Anaheim
(Figure 3) is currently being investigated by staff. The property is zoned for light
industry and was originally to be used for an industrial development. Environmental site
assessment efforts for subsurface contamination are apparent. The surrounding area is
commercial/industrial and staff will continue to research this site and assess its feasibility
for a water recycling facility.
9) REVIEW OF OTHER AVAILABLE PROPERTY
The availability of other properties in the Anaheim Forebay area is being
monitored to be able to make a complete evaluation of potential water recycling facility
sites. Consulting services for approximately $5,000 are being considered to help report
the availability five-to-ten acre parcels on a monthly basis. The consultant will provide
information on the price, motivation of the seller, land use, zoning, and proximity to
industrial as well as residential areas. This information will help staff keep updated on
potential 'hew' sites.
SMB:ahh
REF #330112.RP
4 �i
Staff Report
Status of Water Recycling Site Acquisition
March 18, 1993
FIGURE 1. Potential Sites for an Upstream Water Recycling Facility
in North Orange County
Waste Water Disposal Company Crescent Basin
F1, W
ULLIR TOH4 CFM
7BLL2W4 0 ,,,� PHriY� NEI8i
La Palma
Dm6LRW T0W � ^�
u.s.�
�6 W0WT0®
N.
gu�ur�
Pam AW0 ECI
dRE
..a0�
I • A.
�. �.
Staff Report
Status of Water Recycling Site Acquisition ` -
March 18, 1993 �•r
FIGURE 2. GSA Surplus Property Near Harbor and Ball in Anaheim
! VERMO.VT AVE.
Y
� couvey
OF
ORA,VGE
HARBOR
/ Lu
6L VO,
_-- COMPLEX
:AUAPAT/OA/TAUKO Ir
NE/G11/N6
2W CHUB?AT/ON
4.
-6-
Staff Report
Status of Water Recycling Site Acquisition
March 18, 1993
v
FIGURE 3. State College Boulevard/Winston Road Site
' s � �: �a :.•..M y4 'x 4 ws Ex �
..`55R s, SYG •.. EW. s - . i b py'` °'. + .�I:i 'Sd '^°�4
b NOY M� VV S�iY e ..
m � 4 • � wcwa,�r�` "�� 1
"• � _ .. € I 3 SITE
�w
-7-
e
THE DISTRICTS' NEED FOR ON-SITE RECYCLED WATER USE
• ENSURE MAXIMUM EMPLOYEE SAFETY
• LESS COSTLY THAN POTABLE WATER
• WILL REPLACE SOME TREATMENT PLANT
(SECONDARY) WATER
• WILL HELP CONSERVE WATER RESOURCES
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF PLANT NO. 1 WATER USES
Potable Recycled Plant
Water Water Water
Domestic Uses Blower Building Primary Clarifiers
Boiler Water Headworks Washdown
Evaporators* Scrubbers Secondary Clarifiers
Eye Wash Plant Irrigation Washdown
Stations Chemical Mixing Digester Gas Handling
Hot Water Loop General Cooling
Admin. Irrigation Washdown Chlorination
Central Central Generation*
Generation* Belt Press Wash
Headworks Washdown
Blower Building Cooling
*Under Construction
TABLE 2
WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS FROM 1992 THROUGH 2O10
WATER USES
(mgd) 1992 2010
PLANT 1
Ave. Peak Ave. Peak
Potable Water .11 1.47 .21 3.16
Recycled Water .97 1.76 2.68 4.81
Plant Water 5.24 6.32 7.61 9.96
u PLANT 2
Ave. Peak Ave. Peak
Potable Water .25 1.73 .22 1.48
Recycled Water .72' .72' .72 .72
Plant Water 7.78 9.07 6.67 7.78
* Not Presently Available
DISTRICTS' OPTIONS FOR A RECYCLED WATER SUPPLY
1) GREEN ACRES PROJECT
RECEIVE RECYCLED WATER FROM THE
OCWD VIA EXISTING PIPELINE
2) INSTALLATION OF ON-SITE
WATER RECYCLING FACILITIES
DISTRICTS' OPTIONS FOR A RECYCLED WATER SUPPLY
2) INSTALLATION OF ON-SITE WATER RECYCLING FACILITIES
Ultraviolet Disinfection Alternative
Polymer
Alum
Secondary
Effluent
:TT Granular
Rapid Flocculation Media
Mix Filtration
Reclaimed
Wastewater
UV Disinfection
PRESENT-WORTH COSTS
Green Acres Project On-Site Water Recycling
$ 4.7 million $ 7.6 million
Green Acres Project Water
Districts pay Operations & Maintenance costs
for the amount of Green Acres Project water
used. ($460.50 per million gallons)
ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT DISINFECTION PILOT PLANT
Determine specific criteria (UV dose and operational parameters)
required to maintain reliability of UV disinfection treatment.
Identify and define parameters that affect UV disinfection efficiency
when using the Districts' secondary effluent.
--u
RECOMMENDATIONS
A) Authorize staff to complete negotiations for an agreement with
the OCWD in a form approved by the General Counsel that
would:
1) Provide up to 50 mgd of secondary effluent to the OCWD for
recycling purposes at no charge, with a provision to, at any time,
reevaluate the valuation and pricing for secondary effluent.
2) Provide for purchase of GAP water for 20 years at the audited
cost to operate and maintain the GAP facility. (The current
O&M cost is $460.50 per mg or $150 per AF.) The contract
would provide that the Districts' cost would not exceed the O&M
cost or the lowest cost of any GAP customer, whichever is less.
9'
RECOMMENDATIONS
B) Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with the OCWD for
pilot plant testing of UV light disinfection technology, costs to be
shared equally in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the
Districts' share of out-of-pocket costs for outside consulting
services. (Estimated total cost to the Districts, including in-
house laboratory services, is $80,000.)
1� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
0 01 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
March 18, 1993 IOM< AVENUE
a0.E0.E+n
' MWMN V"UY.CgtlfU B2]28Al2)
9141es2A 11
STAFF REPORT
SUPPLY OF RECYCr ED WATER FOR DISTRICTS' TREATMENT PLANT
1) BACKGROUND
The Districts' 1989 Master Plan identified the desirability of using recycled water
at Plants No. 1 and No. 2 to meet a portion of our plant operating water requirements.
Use of recycled (tertiary) water for certain treatment plant processes is less costly than
potable water, will replace treatment plant (secondary) water, will ensure maximum
safety for the Districts' employees, and will help conserve water resources.
In the Master Plan, it was assumed that this water would be supplied by the
Orange County Water District (OCWD) at a minimal cost and the Districts would, in
turn, continue to supply the OCWD with secondary effluent for recycling purposes. In
1991, the Districts began receiving Green Acres Project (GAP) recycled water from the
OCWD at an average rate of approximately 1.4 million gallons per day (mgd) at Plant
No. 1. Plans are underway to provide recycled water to Plant No. 2. The Districts have
�✓ been receiving GAP water pending negotiation of a contract with the OCWD to define
the terms and conditions of its acquisition.
The Districts have a long-standing policy of making their treated secondary
effluent available for water recycling. Pursuant to a 1972 agreement, the Districts have
provided the OCWD with up to 15 mgd of secondary effluent free of charge over the
past 20 years for use in Water Factory 21 and since 1991 for GAP. As the OCWD's
needs for secondary effluent increase (they estimate an eventual demand of up to
50 mgd) the Districts must treat additional effluent to the secondary level to meet both
our NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit requirements and the OCWD's needs.
The recommended agreement with the OCWD will reiterate the Districts' support
for water recycling and the Boards' current policy of supplying its effluent at no cost to
the OCWD. The agreement will also provide language that will allow for review of the
value and cost of our secondary effluent at any time.
2) DISTRICTS' TREATMENT PLANT RECYCLED WATER NEEDS
The Districts' 1989 Master Plan identified the use of three different water supplies
at Plants No. 1 and No. 2 in order to meet various treatment plant water needs, ensure
maximum safety, and still conserve potable water supplies. Table 1 summarizes that
information.
r
s s
Staff Report
Supply of Recycled Water
March 18, 1993
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF PLANT NO. 1 WATER USES
Potable Recycled Plant
Water Water Water
Domestic Uses Blower Building Primary Clarifiers Washdown
Boiler Water Headworks Secondary Clarifiers Washdown
Evaporators' Scrubbers Digester Gas Handling Cooling
Eye Wash Stations Plant Irrigation Chlorination
Hot Water Loop Chemical Mixing Central Generation'
Admin. Irrigation General Washdown Belt Press Wash
Central Generation' Headworks Washdown
Blower Building Cooling
n er onstrucnon
At Plant No. 1, all three water supplies are used including potable water supplied
through the City of Fountain Valley, recycled GAP water currently supplied by the
OCWD, and plant water (disinfected secondary effluent). Table 2 summarizes current
and projected water use at Plants No. 1 and No. 2, respectively.
TABLE 2
WATER DEMAND PROJECTIONS FROM 1992 THROUGH 2O10
WATER USES
(mgd) 1992 2010
PLANT 1
Average Peak Average Peak
Potable Water 11 1.47 .21 3.16
Recycled Water 97 1.76 2.68 4.81
Plant Water 5.24 6.32 7.61 9.96
PLANT 2
Average Peak Average Peak
Potable Water .25 1.73 .22 1.48
Recycled Water .72' .72' 72 .72
Plant Water 7.78 9.07 6.67 7.78
Not Presently Available
-2-
` a
3
Staff Report
Supply of Recycled Water
March 18, 1993
Due to the higher cost of potable water and our interest in conserving water
supplies, the Districts have implemented measures to reduce water use. Total water use
has been significantly reduced. In addition, as GAP becomes available in appropriate
quantities, it can be used and replace the use of water from other sources. Potable
water is only used for employee needs and for treatment processes requiring a very high
quality water. This has allowed the Districts to shift some of its treatment processes to
recycled water that meets strict California Department of Health Services (DHS)
standards. This action is consistent with state law that declares it is unreasonable and a
waste to use potable water in circumstances where recycled water is available, meets
water quality needs, and is economically feasible.
The Districts' water demands continue to increase as construction of new facilities
is completed. This is especially true at Plant No. 1 as wastewater flows are expected to
increase over the next 20 years from 55 mgd to 150 mgd. Staff continues to identify the
most suitable water supply for each treatment process based on maintaining maximum
employee safety, while keeping in mind the water quality needed for each job and the
cost effectiveness of each type of water utilized.
3) OPTIONS FOR RECYCLED WATER SUPPLY
�✓ The Districts and the OCWD first formalized their working relationship in 1972 with an
agreement that provided the OCWD with up to 15 mgd of secondary treated effluent for
water recycling purposes at no cost. The 30-year agreement also defined the terms for
the Districts to receive desalting brines from the OCWD. Revisions to the 1972
agreement are needed to reflect changes that have occurred or that are anticipated in
the future, including the Districts' cost for GAP water.
Last year, the Districts' Master Plan water recycling goals were reviewed with the
Directors and the Boards who reiterated support for water recycling. Staff was also
authorized to negotiate a new agreement with the OCWD to: 1) continue providing
secondary treated effluent to the OCWD at no cost, but with provisions to reopen the
issue of valuation of secondary effluent; and 2) purchase GAP water at a price no
greater than any other GAP water customer. The Directors and the Boards also
directed staff to evaluate the option of the Districts constructing and operating their own
on-site water recycling facilities as an alternative to purchasing GAP water.
Over the past two years, staff from both districts have been discussing appropriate
revisions to the 1972 agreement. A range of alternatives for GAP water pricing have
been explored including the Districts buying a percentage of the GAP facility and
"owning" a reserved capacity of GAP water; the feasibility of the Districts producing their
�./ -3-
Staff Report
Supply of Recycled Water
March 18, 1993
own recycled water using small, on-site modular treatment plant additions; and the
pricing options on continuing to receive GAP water from the OCWD at some agreed to
cost based on different assumptions.
The Districts also have the option of increasing use of potable water to meet their
needs; however, this is not in keeping with the Districts' commitment to water recycling
and conservation measures, nor is it cost effective. The Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California projections for increased water costs are significant. By the year
2000, potable water is expected to increase from $988 per-million-gallons (mg) to $2,084
per mg [or $679 per acre foot (AF)I. It would cost the Districts over $1.9 million for 912
mg (or 2,800 AF) of potable water for that year versus $420,000 for an equivalent
amount of GAP water.
(A) Option 1 - GAP Recycled Water
The Districts have the option to continue receiving GAP water. Staff from both
districts have negotiated and reached preliminary agreement on terms for the Districts'
purchase of GAP water from the OCWD. The cost of GAP water to the Districts for
the 20-year term would be the operations and maintenance (O&M) costs that the
OCWD incurs to produce this water. This cost is and would continue to be the lowest
price paid by any GAP water retailer. The current O&M cost is $460.50 per mg (or
$150 per AF). The OCWD would provide the Districts an annual audit of O&M costs.
Should the OCWD determine that they can no longer provide the Districts with GAP
water, then the Districts would receive a 24-month notification from the OCWD that
GAP water service will be reduced or eliminated. This would give the Districts adequate
time to install their own small, modular water recycling facilities (discussed below). The
present worth cost for the OCWD GAP option is $4.7 million.
GAP water meets stringent DHS safety standards for recycled water. It is filtered
and chlorinated at the OCWD facility. Use of this water in treatment processes that may
produce a spray or involve potential human contact, affords maximum safety to Districts'
employees. However, the GAP water contains a chlorine concentration of approximately
5 milligrams per liter (mg/L). This high concentration of chlorine has presented a
problem in some of our treatment plant processes and therefore limits its use in certain
applications. For example, chlorine apparently breaks down the chemicals used in
polymer mixing requiring the Districts to use excessive amounts of polymer for biosolids
dewatering at a considerably higher cost. We expect that this problem can be solved by
the use of ultraviolet (UV) disinfection technology in lieu of chlorination as discussed
later in this report.
-4-
Staff Report
Supply of Recycled Water
March 18, 1993
Another GAP water purchase option was originally proposed by OCWD. It
would have required the Districts to pay the going retail rate for GAP water, currently at
$497 per mg ($162 per AF) and reserve a 2,800 AF volume of GAP water. Its present
worth cost is $14 million. This option was rejected by the Districts because of the less
costly on-site option discussed below which has led to the O&M cost pricing structure.
(B) Option 2 - On-Site Production of Recycled Water
A study was conducted to determine the feasibility of the Districts producing their
own recycled water using small, modular treatment facilities. These facilities would use
UV light disinfection as opposed to high levels of chlorine. Such facilities would be
under the Districts' control. The Districts could receive GAP water for the next two
years until the facilities are installed. The present worth cost for installation of the
Districts' own on-site water recycling treatment facilities is estimated at $7.6 million.
On-site water recycling treatment facilities would be modular in nature and could
be installed simply on a concrete pad, approximately 60 x 80 feet in size. The facilities
would include filtration and disinfection by ultraviolet light (UV) treatment. A small
amount of chlorine disinfectant would be added to prevent bacterial regrowth in the
water distribution system. The facilities would have a 20-year life and back-up water to
this system would be potable water supplies from the cities.
The Districts' staff and consultant investigated the use of UV disinfection as a
cost-effective alternative to high-dose chlorination. UV disinfection is desirable
compared to chlorination as expenses are lower, large chlorine contact chambers are not
required, and the risk of leaks from on-site chlorine storage is minimized. Although UV
disinfection is a relatively new technology, there are more than 400 wastewater treatment
plants in the United States that use UV systems and an estimated 100 to 200 more
facilities are planning to use UV.
Like GAP water, the recycled water produced by on-site facilities would meet the
stringent DHS safety standards for the protection of the Districts' employees. Pathogen
removal would be monitored by the Districts' laboratory staff. Water produced by on-
site facilities would have only a small amount of residual chlorine to prevent bacterial
regrowth and biofilm formation in pipes. Therefore, this water could be used in more
treatment processes than OCWD's current recycled water can because of the GAP
water's high chlorine level.
� -5-
l
Staff Report
Supply of Recycled Water
March 18, 1993
4) ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT DISINFECTION PILOT PLANT TESTING
Both districts are interested in maximizing the use of recycled water. To achieve
that goal the Sanitation Districts desire recycled water without high residual chlorine.
This can best be achieved with the use of UV disinfection. The OCWD also wants to
evaluate UV disinfection for Phase II of GAP and for Water Factory 21. Therefore,
both districts are interested in evaluating UV light disinfection as an alternative to
chlorination. The results from these studies will benefit the Districts by providing
information on the feasibility of using UV disinfection as a potential alternative
disinfectant to chlorine.
Staff from both agencies are recommending that a joint pilot plant test be
conducted to determine the feasibility of UV disinfection for our respective water and
wastewater treatment processes. A pilot test facility is available and a desirable site for
testing has been determined adjacent to the GAP facility at the OCWD. Joint piloting
efforts would require consulting services from a firm(s) with hands-on experience in UV
disinfection and the required microbiological analyses. The OCWD would be the lead
agency for the proposed pilot testing. The estimated cost for outside consulting services
is $80,000 shared equally by the OCWD and the Districts. In addition, the Sanitation
Districts would provide in-house laboratory services in an estimated amount of $40,000
for conducting microbiological analyses for the pilot plant. The OCWD would provide
the labor and other in-house services to operate the pilot plant and conduct the testing.
5) CONCLUSIONS
It is more economical, $4.7 million vs. $7.6 million present worth cost, for the
Districts to buy GAP water than to install and operate small, modular water recycling
facilities at Plants No. 1 and No. 2. In the future, should the OCWD determine that it is
no longer able to supply the Districts with recycled water due to other community
demands, then the Districts would have the option to install and operate small, modular
water recycling facilities to meet its water needs.
6) RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends the following actions:
A) Authorize staff to complete negotiations for an agreement with the OCWD in
a form approved by the General Counsel, that would; 1) provide up to 50 mgd of
secondary effluent to the OCWD for recycling purposes at no charge, with a provision to,
at any time, reevaluate the valuation and pricing for secondary effluent; and 2) provide
-6- �/
Staff Report
Supply of Recycled Water
March 18, 1993
for purchase of GAP water for 20 years at the audited cost to operate and maintain the
GAP facility. (The current O&M cost is $460.50 per mg or $150 per AF). The contract
would provide that the Districts' cost would not exceed the O&M cost or the lowest cost
of any GAP customer, whichever is less.
B) Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with the OCWD for pilot plant
testing of UV light disinfection technology, costs to be shared equally in an amount not
to exceed $40,000 for the Districts' share of out-of-pocket costs for outside consulting
services. (Estimated total cost to the Districts', including in-house laboratory services, is
$80,000.)
SMB:ahh
Ref#230415.rp
�r -7-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
el ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
tU9C<ELU9 AVENUE
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16 yp Spy 9127
FWHgIN V1LLEY.CALIFORNIA 9272"127
March 30, 1993 71.199E-2Ar1
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE
RE: COMPUTERS
Meeting Date: March 30, 1993 -- 5:30 0. m.
COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF MEMBERS:
William Mahoney, Joint Chairman Thomas M. Dawes, Director of
Evelyn Hart, Vice Joint Chairman Engineering
Charles Puckett, Chairman, Fiscal Wendy Sevenandt, Staff
Policy Committee Engineer
Steve Hovey, Manager of
AB ENT: Information Services
Gary Streed, Director of
Buck Catlin, Past Joint Chairman Finance
Peer Swan, Chairman, District No. 14
1 . Computerized Facilities Record and Drawings System. Job No. J-25-1.
The Committee members reviewed the proposed Computerized Facilities
Record and Drawings System, Job No. J-25-1 (see enclosed Staff Report). The
Committee considered dividing the work into phases and reviewed the Scope of
Work for the first phase and approved the list of firms to receive a Request For
Proposal for the Phase I work.
The Phase I work would include a Needs Assessment. This work would
begin with the review of previously prepared staff work which outlines the broad
scope of the project. The project will provide a computerized data logging and
retrieving system to develop utility system drawings using as-built information.
The Phase I work would identify sources of information, need for information,
develop a conceptual system design, and make recommendations to produce a
product that can be easily used and updated.
The final outcome of the Phase I work would be the preparation of a detailed
Scope of Work outlining the project for implementation. The Scope of Work would
be used for Phases 11 and III. Phase II would be the development of plans and
specifications to purchase the necessary computer hardware and software and
evaluate computer systems; while Phase III would provide for the actual work (i.e.:
development of plant and collection facilities record systems drawings). Staff
estimates that the Phase I work will be about $125,000.00; while Phase II and III
work would be approximately $2,075,000.00. `.
2. Recommendations
The Committee recommends that the Boards of Directors approve the
following actions:
A. Approve the three-phase approach for the Computerized Facilities
Records and Drawings Systems, Job No. J-25-1, and authorize
preceding with implementation.
B. Authorize the Special Selection Committee Re Computers to solicit
proposals and negotiate Professional Services Contract(s) for the
phased approach for consideration by the Boards.
Final Committee recommendations will be brought back to the Boards of
Directors for approval.
TMD:jac
ENGW-25-1\033093.scr
Enclosure u
' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
01 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
March 24, 1993 1p MIS AV NU6
flo WX 8127
F WAIN VLL .UUMAN1A 92n"127
91a196L2an
STAFF REPORT
Solicitation of Proposals
for
Computerized Facilities Record and Drawings System
Job No. J-25-1
Phase I - Needs Assessment
SUMMARY
For sometime, the Special Joint Works Selection Committee has
been considering a Computerized Facilities Record and Drawings
System. The Committee members have decided to execute a phased
approach to implement this project. This staff report describes
the phases to be implemented, presents the Phase 1--Needs
Assessment Scope of Work, and identifies potential firms
qualified to receive Requests for Proposals.
PROJECT PHASES
A phased approach to assess the needs of the Districts, select
the equipment and software to handle the data, and convert the
data to electronic format will allow the Districts to obtain a
quality product, yet allow the solicitation of fee proposals.
This project is now proposed to be implemented in three phases
with three separate professional services agreements. The three
phases are summarized as follows:
Phase I•
The first phase would be a needs assessment to determine the
characteristics and requirements of a computerized facility
records and drawing system. This assessment will identify
information to be included in the computerized map and
database, set the priorities regarding information to be
included during the initial data conversion to meet
budgetary goals, estimate costs, develop a conceptual design
for the system, evaluate and maximize the use of existing
hardware and software, and address adherence to the
Information Services Master Plan for computer systems. A
project approach will be developed by the consultant which
provides guidelines for the procurement of hardware and
software, implementation of the system and management of the
data.
� 1
Phase II:
The second phase provides for the selected firm to develop
computer specifications for the acquisition of the computer
hardware and software in conformance with the Information
Services Master Plan, assist in the evaluation of hardware
and software systems which will meet the needs identified in
the first phase, and prepare plans for the layout of the
system including network links at the Districts offices.
Hardware and software would be procured and installed during
this phase through the Districts' bid process. The
Information Services Division will be heavily involved
during the system evaluation and procurement.
• Phase III•
The third phase will provide for the selected firm to build
the database structure allowing for expansion, develop CAD
drawing standards, develop data management procedures,
develop system operation manuals, provide data conversion,
develop the maps for the plant and collection system
drawings and record system, and provide training. A quality
assurance and quality control plan for the conversion effort
will be developed to include monitoring of production costs,
verification of billing and monitoring the status of
project. This third phase could include a pilot project to
check results prior to full system implementation. The
pilot project could cover a small portion of the plant to
verify that the output is usable.
The firm selected for the Phase I work need not necessarily be
selected for Phases II and III.
SCOPE OF WORE - PHASE I
The Phase I--Needs Assessment Scope of Work is included as
Attachment A. The project goals and characteristics of the
Computerized Facilities Records and Drawing System are defined
and the project description for Phase I is detailed.
FIRMS FOR CONSIDERATION
On May 6, 1992, presentations were made before the Special Joint
Works Selection Committee by the following firms:
1. Lee & Ro Consulting Engineers/RJN Group, Inc. (A Joint
Venture)
2. John Carollo Engineers/Boyle Engineering Corp./Psomas (A
Joint Venture)
3. James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc.
2 ��
An issue of concern has been discussed regarding the use of a
y firm during the needs assessment that markets hardware or
software. The objectivity of the firm may be lost since they
would prefer to sell their product.
Many wastewater design firms have developed computer software for
the hydraulic modeling and design of collection systems. Further
advancements have seen firms tie a hydraulic modeling program
into a graphics program to show routing strategies and pipeline
profiles. Having this expertise demonstrates the firm-s
qualifications for performing collection system projects. The
Districts' should benefit by considering only firms that have
developed this expertise. The following firms could be
considered for the needs assessment:
1) Black & Veatch teamed with PlanGraphics, Irvine, California
Black & Veatch is an established consulting firm that has a
strong background in wastewater design. In 1991, Black &
Veatch formed a business alliance with PlanGraphics to share
technical support to meet project requirements.
PlanGraphics is an independent multidisciplinary consulting
firm that specializes in the design and implementation of
automated mapping and facilities management (AM/FM) and
geographic information systems (GIS) . PlanGraphics has
performed nearly 400 needs assessment projects for AM/FM and
GIS.
The City of Long Beach was contacted as a client reference
for PlanGraphics for needs assessment and system selection
consulting services for a GIS system. The contact
recommended the firm highly and said that they would
definitely consider the firm for additional work. The
contact stated that Psomas did not perform well for the City
and that a Boyle storm drain mapping project was not
implemented as a true relational database.
2) Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates (RBF) , Irvine,
California
RBF is a full service consulting firm providing planning,
engineering, surveying, GIS, and related professional
services. RBF has a strong background in computer aided
drafting and design and GIS implementation for roadways and
underground utilities. RBF completed a GIS Master Plan for
the Rancho California Watei District (RCWD) . The project
parallels the work proposed in the CSDOC Facility Mapping
project. They are currently in the implementation phase of
the RCWD utility mapping project. As a part of the RCWD
project, RBF is integrating RJN's "CASSWORKS" for sewer
modeling and Oracle for the database. This experience with
3
CASSWORKS, GIS and Oracle would benefit the CSDOC project
when integrating the Computerized Maintenance Management
System.
3) Other firms that may qualify for providing services to
conduct the needs assessment have just recently contacted
the Engineering staff expressing an interest in the project.
The firms are CH2MHill and Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. The
Engineering staff would conduct an interview with a tour of
the firm's computer/GIS facilities prior to selecting the
firms as a recepient of a Request for Proposal.
At the meeting, staff will discuss the advantages and
disadvantages of each firm. The committee members may now of
other qualified firms that could be considered to perform the
needs assessment. It is recommended that a short list be
developed of two or more firms that would receive the Request for
Proposals for the Scope of Work. Staff presents the following
firms for consideration in making a short list:
FIRM STRENGTHS
Black & Veatch/P1anGraphics Wastewater Design Experience,
FM/GIS Experience
J.M. Montgomery Wastewater Design Experience,
FM/GIS Experience
RBF Wastewater Design Experience,
FM/GIS Experience
Carollo Wastewater Design Experience
Boyle Wastewater Design Experience,
Computerized Systems
Development without Relational
Database
Lee & Ro Wastewater Design Experience
RJN Wastewater Design Experience,
FM/GIS Experience
Camp Dresser & McKee Wastewater Design Experience,
Some FM/GIS Experience
implemented as tools for
projects.
CH2MHill Wastewater Design Experience,
FM/GIS Experience
4
COST ESTIMATE
The preliminary estimate of costs to conduct the studies and
install the system is detailed on the next page and summarized
below:
DEVELOPMENT AND INSTALLATION COSTS
Consulting Services
Phase I $ 125, 000
Phase II $ 75, 000
Phase III $2 ,000, 000
Total Consulting Services $2, 200, 000
Computer Equipment
Hardware/Software $ 125, 000
Installation $ 10,000
Total Computer Equipment $ 135, 000
Districts Staff $ 465, 000
Total Development and Installation Cost $2,800,000
The estimated annual operation cost is based upon two full-time
people at $45, 000 per year and an overhead rate of but.
ANNUAL SYSTEM OPERATIONAL STAFFING COST $ 144,000
With minor reorganization within the Engineering Department, the
positions necessary to develop, install and operate the system
could be provided within existing authorized staffing levels and
no new positions would have to be added.
5
COST ESTIMATE
A. CONSULTING STAFF
PHASE I - NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Needs Assessment 400 hrs * $80/hr $ 32,000
Research Base Map 80 hrs * $80/hr $ 6,400
Conceptual Design 600 hrs * $80/hr $ 48,000
Cost Analysis 80 hrs * $80/hr $ 6,400
Implementation Plan 80 hrs * $80/hr $ 6,400
Procurement Approach 80 hrs * $80/hr $ 6,400
Technical Memorandum 160 hrs * $80/hr $ 12,800
Scope of Work 80 hrs * $80/hr $ 6 400
Bub-total Phase I 124,800
PHASE II - COMPUTER SYSTEM ACQUISITION
Plans and Specifications 600 hrs * $80/hr $ 48,000
Systems Evaluation 160 hrs * $80/hr $ 12,800
Sub-total Phase II 60,800
PHASE III - SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
Database Development 1440 hrs * $80/hr $ 115,200
CAD Standards 320 hrs * $80/hr $ 25,600
Data Management Procedures 320 hrs * $80/hr $ 25,600
Operation Manuals 320 hrs * $80/hr $ 25,600
Data Conversion 11295 sheets * 2 hr/sht * $70/hr $1,581,300
Field Work 2080 hrs * $80/hr $ 166,400
Training 1000 hrs * $80/hr $ 80 000
Sub-total Phase III $2,019,700
consulting services Bub-total $2,195,700
----------
B. COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
Computer Equipment - Initial System $ 60,000
- $13,000 per Station * 5 $ 65,000
- Installation $ 10,000
Sub-total 335,000
C. DISTRICTS STAFF
DRAWING DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Duration of project 3 people * 2 yrs * $50,000/yr $ 300,000
overhead @ 60% $ 180,000
Sub-total 480,0 0
ORAMD TOTAL (A, 8, AND C) $2,810,700
ANNUAL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE CHARGES
2 people @ $45,000 per year $ 90,000
overhead @ 60E $ ""0V
47 ��e,uuu
Ypdoc\"\1.25-1\032445.SR
V
' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
01 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
March 24, 1993 10B°°fL115°VEN1E
V O W.8121
FMWMN VL Y.0 IFMNW 921 4127
r 7I4I962.2411
ATTACHMENT "A"
SCOPE OF WORK
Computerized Facilities Record and Drawings System
Phase I
Job No. J-25-1
I. SUMMARY
Conduct a needs assessment to determine the characteristics and
requirements for a computerized system which will be used to develop and
maintain a facility and utility atlas of Reclamation Plant No. 1 , Treatment
Plant No. 2 and interconnecting utilities, and a facilities layout, land use map
and hydraulic model of the Districts' collection system.
II. BACKGROUND
To meet the Districts' growing wastewater load requirements and to comply
with stringent federal and state environmental regulations, new facilities
have been constructed and existing facilities have been modified through
many construction contracts. Facilities have also been modified by the
Districts' staff. Record drawings of the construction projects are kept on
file. Although these drawings adequately document the facilities
constructed, they do not describe the treatment process as a complete
system comprised of the individual process units, utilities, system interfaces,
instrumentation, and electrical network, nor are they cross referenced. Due
to the layered construction of most treatment processes, information for the
process systems must be located through many construction projects. Minor
in-house modifications, including those made in an emergency, are not
documented.
With the continual expansion and modification of the District facilities, the
ability to access process information readily is critical. Combining the
information from project drawings, information gathered from Districts' staff,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS,
W ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10844EW6 AVENUE /
and investigation of actual plant installations to generate a complete°4a'etlt%an
map would be invaluable for design, operations, maintenance WnTAT EA TO 4 C N.A 8210E
functions. 1/
An evaluation of the Trunk Sewer Conveyance System resulted from the
1989 Master Plan project. Land use areas were determined and flows
projected. The data was entered, in spreadsheet format, to a hydraulic
model to simulate flow through the trunk system and pump stations. The
results of the model led to the recommendations for future expansion as
described In the Master Plan. The land use mapping information and
hydraulic modeling data are available In hardcopy for establishing a
computerized system to be used by Districts' staff in locating information on
the trunk sewers and projecting flows and system expansions.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The J-25 project will be implemented in three phases using three separate
professional services agreements. The three phases are briefly described as
follows:
Ph :
The first phase, this phase, is to conduct an assessment to determine the
characteristics and requirements of a computerized facility records and
drawing system. This assessment shall identify information to be
included in the computerized map and database, develop a conceptual
design for the system, evaluate and maximize the use of existing
hardware and software, and address adherence to the Information
Services Master Plan for computer systems. The needs assessment shall
result in a project approach to procure hardware and software, implement
the system and manage the data. The Consultant shall prepare a scope
of work incorporating Districts' comments to accomplish the second
phase.
Phase II:
The second phase will be to develop computer specifications for the
acquisition of the computer hardware and software in conformance with
the Information Services Master Plan, evaluate and procure hardware and
software systems which will meet the needs identified in the first phase,
and prepare plans for the layout of the system including network links at
the Districts offices. The Consultant for this phase will prepare a scope
of work for the third phase.
-2 ��
Phase III:
The third phase will be to build the database structure allowing for
expansion; develop CAD drawing standards, data management
procedures, and system operation manuals; provide data conversion and
develop the maps for the plant and collection system drawings and record
system; and provide training. A quality assurance and quality control plan
for the conversion effort will be developed to include monitoring of
production costs, verification of billing and status of project.
IV. TOTAL PROJECT GOALS
The consultant shall understand the total project goals so that a proposal can
be completed for the needs assessment portion of the project. The
description below identifies the two mapping projects and the District's idea
of information to be included for the drawings and a relational database.
This information shall be refined through the needs assessment.
The first project will produce an automated computer generated map
depicting the facilities and utilities for Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain
Valley, Treatment Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach and all interconnecting
utilities and facilities. A layered utility map will be completed to show all
plant processes, utilities, and structures as they are actually installed.
The second mapping project will be a facilities map, land use map and
hydraulic modeling computer system portraying the Districts service area of
Orange County with the Districts' trunk sewer system superimposed upon
the base map of the service area. This system will generate a layered
computer map which will classify the land use, show the collection system,
maintain information pertinent to the collection system, and model the
collection system for planning purposes.
Further detail of what the Districts wish to accomplish with the Facilities
Records and Drawings System is described below. This description is to act
as a guide for the needs assessment. The task of producing the drawings or
database will be performed under another phase.
1. PLANTS AND INTERCONNECTING UTILITIES
A. FACILITY AND UTILITY MAP
A facility and utility computerized mapping system with a relational
database will be implemented for Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment
�..i -3-
r
Plant No. 2 as well as all interconnecting utilities which shall depict each
plant as a group of processes which are interrelated to make a complete
system.
These maps will show the plants in plan view, with all tanks, basins,
buildings, diversion structures, roadways, equipment, piping, valves,
gates, stop logs, weirs, other piping appurtenances, manholes,
underground pull boxes, power distribution panels, power distribution
transformers, motor control centers, branch circuit panels, motors, free
standing control panels, computer work stations, duct banks, telephone
and data networks, fiber optics, conduits, cable raceways, and the point
of electric service (with meter number) shown. The drawings will use the
Districts established plant coordinate and grid system. All coordinates
which are field verified will be indicated as such.
A base map for each plant will be developed in a layered method to show
the plant perimeter, river and other surrounding features, roadways,
tunnels, duct banks, tanks, and a footprint of basins, buildings and other
structures. All existing facilities and facilities under construction will be
included and identified. Tunnels, duct banks and roadways will also be
identified. Topographic features and the superimposition of areal
photographs with the facility maps will be included if the assessment
phase recommends a system with these capabilities.
All utilities will be depicted in a layered method as developed in the
conceptual design for this project with the option to select specific
utilities for viewing and printing. Sectional views at areas of intensive
piping and cross sections of various areas in tunnels and at tunnel
intersections will be produced. These sections will be accessible from the
graphics screen through menu driven commands.
Cross-sections will identify the elevation of the utilities, pipe service and
size, conduits and cable trays. Cross-section drawings will be created in
sufficient quantity such that there is no section in the tunnels which does
not have a representative cross-section drawing. References between the
plan view and the cross-sections are required.
Categories of pipe service will be as identified in the 1991 Edition of the
Standard Specifications. Piping information which will be shown on the
drawings include line size, material of construction, process flow
direction, and the process material being conveyed. This information can
be in a code form developed in the standards.
-4-
Identification of conduit size and contents of the duct banks will be
included. Capabilities will be provided to allow the generation of a
conduit schedule.
Information will be contained in a relational database which identifies
construction projects by Districts' job numbers and makes reference to
shop drawings. Through computer commands, the information will
appear in the respective areas on the drawing or printed in a report
format.
2. COLLECTION SYSTEM
A computer aided facilities management and modeling system will be
established at the District offices to allow data access, data control,
facilities mapping and collection system planning by District personnel.
The computer system will consist of a central relational database linked
with the CAD system for mapping and a hydraulic modeling program for
the sewer system.
The facility map shall show:
The entire Districts service area
District boundaries
Drainage basin boundaries
Composite land use map showing planning zones
City, County, and State roads and highway right-of-ways
The complete collection system including pump stations,
pipes, diversion structures, manholes and nodes
Facilities numbering system for easy reference
Land parcels in the unincorporated area of District 7
System software with the capability of measuring land areas to eliminate
hand planimetering methods should be provided. The software will
automatically store area data to appropriate spaces in the relational
database. Modeling software shall give Districts' personnel the ability to
determine sewage flow projections, insert new sewage lines, determine
the normal and optimal routing of sewage flows, and assess impacts of
expansion and growth.
Through the facility map and relational database, the system shall have
the capability for data storage and manipulation and report generation.
At a minimum, the information shall consist of:
-5-
The Consultant must provide a statement acknowledging that no kickbacks,
fees or remuneration of any type may be received from any manufacturer or
supplier for which a recommendation is made on the project.
In submitting a proposal, the Consultant must acknowledge that the proposal
is based on a comprehensive and complete review of the request for
proposal including this scope of work which is an attachment to the request
for proposal.
VIII. SCHEDULE
The tentative schedule for this project is as follows:
Approval of Professional Services Agreement: DAY 1
Completion of Needs Assessment Technical Memorandum: DAY 1 + 8
MONTHS
- Completion of Phase II and III Scope of Work: DAY 1 + 9 MONTHS
The Consultant shall develop a graphic schedule to display the proposed
schedule above with milestones identified. This schedule must be revised
and submitted monthly with the monthly project status report.
STAFF ASSISTANCE
The Districts' staff member assigned to work with the Consultant on the project
is Wendy Sevenandt, (714) 962-2411.
wpdoc%engy-25-1\sow
-12
Identification of conduit size and contents of the duct banks will be
included. Capabilities will be provided to allow the generation of a
conduit schedule.
Information will be contained in a relational database which identifies
construction projects by Districts' job numbers and makes reference to
shop drawings. Through computer commands, the information will
appear in the respective areas on the drawing or printed in a report
format.
2. COLLECTION SYSTEM
A computer aided facilities management and modeling system will be
established at the District offices to allow data access, data control,
facilities mapping and collection system planning by District personnel.
The computer system will consist of a central relational database linked
with the CAD system for mapping and a hydraulic modeling program for
the sewer system.
The facility map shall show:
The entire Districts service area
District boundaries
Drainage basin boundaries
Composite land use map showing planning zones
City, County, and State roads and highway right-of-ways
The complete collection system including pump stations,
pipes, diversion structures, manholes and nodes
Facilities numbering system for easy reference
Land parcels in the unincorporated area of District 7
System software with the capability of measuring land areas to eliminate
hand planimetering methods should be provided. The software will
automatically store area data to appropriate spaces in the relational
database. Modeling software shall give Districts' personnel the ability to
determine sewage flow projections, insert new sewage lines, determine
the normal and optimal routing of sewage flows, and assess impacts of
expansion and growth.
Through the facility map and relational database, the system shall have
the capability for data storage and manipulation and report generation.
At a minimum, the information shall consist of:
L/ -5-
This system must be able to handle the information described above for the
Plants and Interconnecting Utilities and the Collection System and the Power
System Studies, Job No. J-25-2. This computer system will be used to
incorporate changes to the master files Including new plans, record
drawings, maintenance changes, and associated data.
Planning for the integration of the mapping systems with the Computerized
Maintenance Management System (CMMS) shall be addressed in the needs
assessment. RJN's CASSWORKS is the CMMS which is in the stage of
being implemented. Data used in the CMMS which overlaps with the
mapping systems shall be identified. Functions that the Maintenance
Division could perform with the aid of computerized mapping system shall be
identified and the method to integrate the system functions shall be
discussed.
A graphic depiction of the system configuration and information flaw path
shall be developed. Interface with other systems shall be shown with the
system configuration. A description of system interface requirements shall
be provided. The needs assessment shall clearly delineate the requirements
for system integration as opposed to system interfacing.
2. Recommendation for Base Maps
For the collection system, the consultant shall investigate mapping systems
completed by other agencies that cover the Districts service area. The
source agencies, costs, accuracy, and level of detail for the mapping
systems shall be identified. Comparisons shall be made between the base
maps available and the Districts' needs for the collection system mapping
and modeling. Recommendation shall be made for procurement of the
collection system base map which is the most cost effective. Reformatting
to meet the Districts' needs shall be identified and procedures to periodically
update the base map using the source agencies database shall be produced.
If the source agency documents are not adequate, other methods of
acquiring the data shall be identified and costs estimated to generate the
base map.
For the plants and interconnecting utilities, the consultant shall Identify the
method for developing the base map and level of accuracy obtainable. The
entities and data to be entered into the base map shall be determined and
layers assigned.
Identification of conduit size and contents of the duct banks will be
included. Capabilities will be provided to allow the generation of a
conduit schedule.
Information will be contained in a relational database which identifies
construction projects by Districts' job numbers and makes reference to
shop drawings. Through computer commands, the information will
appear in the respective areas on the drawing or printed in a report
format.
2. COLLECTION SYSTEM
A computer aided facilities management and modeling system will be
established at the District offices to allow data access, data control,
facilities mapping and collection system planning by District personnel.
The computer system will consist of a central relational database linked
with the CAD system for mapping and a hydraulic modeling program for
the sewer system.
The facility map shall show:
The entire Districts service area
District boundaries
Drainage basin boundaries
Composite land use map showing planning zones
City, County, and State roads and highway right-of-ways
The complete collection system including pump stations,
pipes, diversion structures, manholes and nodes
Facilities numbering system for easy reference
Land parcels in the unincorporated area of District 7
System software with the capability of measuring land areas to eliminate
hand planimetering methods should be provided. The software will
automatically store area data to appropriate spaces in the relational
database. Modeling software shall give Districts' personnel the ability to
determine sewage flow projections, insert new sewage lines, determine
the normal and optimal routing of sewage flows, and assess impacts of
expansion and growth.
Through the facility map and relational database, the system shall have
the capability for data storage and manipulation and report generation.
At a minimum, the information shall consist of:
� -5-
Facilities reference number (Station #, ID # or other
identification)
Sewer reference names �O
Construction contract number and date
Location and limits of sewer lines
Pipe elevation, size, material of construction, coating or
liner, roughness
Record slope of pipe
Flow monitoring data (design d/D ratio, velocity, flowrate)
Type and size of manholes
Surface elevation and diameter of manhole ring and cover
Surface elevation of surrounding land or street
Invert elevation of pipe entering manhole
Invert elevation of pipe leaving manhole
Distance between manholes
Pump station locations
Pumping equipment data
Force Main length and size
Modeled D/d ratio, velocity, and capacity
Excess capacity
District 7 (unincorporated area) track number, connection
permit nos., dates, and addresses
Industrial dischargers to corresponding manholes or nodes
Additional data determined valuable will be added into the system. The
database software will automatically import all data generated by the
sewer model and provide for report generation. Report formats will be
developed with the Districts input.
The goal of this project is to not duplicate the information included in the
existing maintenance management system, but to link the projects
together to make all maintenance information accessible and perform
modeling and data retrieval while in the graphics screen.
The Consultant shall gather, review, and integrate the existing record
data provided by the Districts and data from the 1989 Master Plan
gravity system computer model. The results of the 1989 Master Plan
modeling effort will be reproduced via this integrated computer aided
facilities management, information and modeling system.
Hardcopy gravity system maps at 1"=4000' scale and hardcopy color
coded land use mapping at 1"=4000' will be available at the Districts
office. Hardcopy tabulations of model system input data and output
reports and model schematics will be available at the Districts' office.
-6-
Note that existing system model data includes only those manhole nodes
necessary to account for points of inflow to the CSDOC system,
'..� diversions, and changes in pipe size or slope.
WORK ELEMENTS
The Consultant shall provide a needs assessment for a computer aided facility and
information management system to manage the Districts' records and drawings.
The assessment shall refine the system descriptions above and determine the
characteristics and requirements of the computerized map and relational database
system through the tasks described below.
1. Assess the Needs of the Districts' Divisions
The consultant shall conduct meetings and interviews with Districts' staff
from various Divisions to the assess the functional requirements of the
Divisions and identify mapping uses and database information. From the
meetings and interviews, a list of potential applications for the automated
mapping system shall be developed. From the list of potential applications,
the priorities for the project shall be identified through discussion with
Districts staff.
The assessment shall establish the graphic information and non-graphic data
�./ to be entered during the initial data capture and the data to be entered for
the long range goals. The activities the system is to perform and
performance requirements shall be described. The number of system users
shall be identified along with projected growth estimates.
An assessment of the source data shall be made to catalog the availability,
quality, location of information, and quantity of information to be stored.
The source data shall be identified and specific details for available data shall
be summarized including location of information, format, accuracy of data
and conversion methods for each data type.
The needs assessment shall address the Districts' planned applications,
assess the Districts existing computer systems and incorporation of the
existing equipment with the,planned system, discuss additional equipment
needs, address existing and planned system used by Orange County and the
cities served by the Districts, systems used by other Consultants and
Contractors who have projects with the Districts, assess the availability of
personnel qualified to use the system through the three project phases and
system operations, and assess the cost of system implementation and
operation.
-7
This system must be able to handle the information described above for the
Plants and Interconnecting Utilities and the Collection System and the Power
System Studies, Job No. J-25-2. This computer system will be used to
incorporate changes to the master files including new plans, record
drawings, maintenance changes, and associated data.
Planning for the integration of the mapping systems with the Computerized
Maintenance Management System (CMMS) shall be addressed in the needs
assessment. RJN's CASSWORKS is the CMMS which is in the stage of
being implemented. Data used in the CMMS which overlaps with the
mapping systems shall be identified. Functions that the Maintenance
Division could perform with the aid of computerized mapping system shall be
identified and the method to integrate the system functions shall be
discussed.
A graphic depiction of the system configuration and information flow path
shall be developed. Interface with other systems shall be shown with the
system configuration. A description of system interface requirements shall
be provided. The needs assessment shall clearly delineate the requirements
for system integration as opposed to system interfacing.
2. Recommendation for Base Maps
For the collection system, the consultant shall investigate mapping systems
completed by other agencies that cover the Districts service area. The
source agencies, costs, accuracy, and level of detail for the mapping
systems shall be identified. Comparisons shall be made between the base
maps available and the Districts' needs for the collection system mapping
and modeling. Recommendation shall be made for procurement of the
collection system base map which is the most cost effective. Reformatting
to meet the Districts' needs shall be identified and procedures to periodically
update the base map using the source agencies database shall be produced.
If the source agency documents are not adequate, other methods of
acquiring the data shall be identified and costs estimated to generate the
base map.
For the plants and interconnecting utilities, the consultant shall identify the
method for developing the base map and level of accuracy obtainable. The
entities and data to be entered into the base map shall be determined and
layers assigned.
-8-
3. Formulate Conceptual Design
+.� The consultant shall develop a conceptual design that defines the
applications for the various Divisions, lists the system data requirements,
identifies graphic information and layers and non-graphic attributes, defines
needs regarding data and drawing management, identifies means to manage
data and maintain the system, identifies responsible Divisions for maintaining
information, develops report formats and identifies staffing and training
requirements. The conceptual design shall establish standards for the
drawings. A conceptual database model shall be developed that shows the
data structure for the graphic and non-graphic attributes and how the data is
accessed.
The conceptual design shall include a general configuration of the hardware
and software and address expandability. The conceptual design must take
into account the Districts' Information Services Division Master Plan for
computer systems. The configuration shall show the proposed locations,
type of work stations, software configuration, location and type of
peripherals, data storage requirements, network connections and servers,
and the interface with existing equipment. The use of existing resources
shall be considered in the conceptual design. The consultant shall evaluate
conceptual system design alternatives and describe potential vendor
packages for the hardware and software. The consultant shall analyze the
costs and benefits of the alternatives.
4. Analyze the Costs and Benefits of the Conceptual Design
The consultant shall analyze the recommended conceptual design for its
costs during start-up and long-term operation and maintenance. These cost
estimates shall be balanced against the anticipated benefits of
implementation to determine general budgeting requirements and payback
period.
5. Prepare an Implementation Plan
The consultant shall formulate a staged implementation strategy for first
implementing a pilot project and then moving to full system implementation.
Recommendations for the budget requirement and Districts staffing needs
shall be made for the stages of the implementation plan. Tasks shall be
identified and a schedule developed. Responsibilities for accomplishing the
tasks shall be assigned.
-9-
The planning strategy shall result in a plan that takes the broad scope of the
Districts' needs into account. At this juncture, the Districts' Board of
Directors may need to review and approve the plans for the implementation 1%9+�
of a pilot project.
6. Hardware and Software Procurement Approach
A project approach to procure hardware and software shall be produced.
As a minimum, hardware and software shall be evaluated on features, data
Integration capabilities, Incorporation of Industry standard formats,
adherence to the Districts' Information Services Master Plan for computer
system acquisition, performance, user interface, equipment cost, software
cost, functionality in handling Districts' needs, compatibility with existing
systems, reliability, expandability, ease of learning and ease of use.
The Information Services Division has developed a Master Plan for acquiring
computer equipment and is described in the Staff Report included as Exhibit
1. The Staff Report included as Exhibit 2 updates this Master Plan. This
Master Plan and industry approved standards shall be assessed for system
selection. Deviations in system selection not consistent with this Master
Plan or industry standards must be justified in the needs assessment
document. Compatibility or system integration with the Computerized
Maintenance Management System shall be considered and addressed. Other
information which the Consultant perceives to be important in the selection
shall be included in the needs assessment.
The assessment shall address links to the existing networks, system
configuration and software programs necessary including but not limited to
drafting program, database, modeling program, file manager, and a text
editor.
7. Needs Assessment Technical Memorandum
A report shall be generated that summarizes all aspects of the needs
assessment as outlined above and as determined pertinent to the selection of
the Computerized Facilities Records and Drawings System. Five copies of
this report shall be submitted to the Districts for review and comment. Ten
bound final copies of the document incorporating all comments shall be
submitted to the Districts.
8. Scope of Work for Phase II
The Consultant shall prepare a scope of work to accomplish the second
phase of the project. The second phase scope of work shall cover, but not
-1 O `�
be limited to, design of the system, system acquisition specifications, pilot
program, database construction requirements, hardware and software
A procurement services including evaluation of systems, and development of
phase three scope of work. All districts comments shall be incorporated into
a final scope of work.
IV. PRE-DESIGN MEETING
Prior to beginning work, a meeting with Districts' staff shall be held to
establish appropriate contacts and review the Consultant's plan to implement
this work.
V. MEETINGS
Project status meetings shall be held a minimum of once a month between
the Districts' and the Consultant's project managers. Additional meetings
shall be held as necessary. All meeting must be documented by the
Consultant with a concurrence of that documentation by the Districts'
project manager.
VI. MONTHLY REPORTS
Monthly progress reports shall be submitted for review and must include as a
minimum: 1) current activities, 2) future activities, 3) potential out-of-scope
items, 4) concerns and possible delays, 5) percentage of completion, and 6)
budget status.
VII. QUALITY ASSURANCE (GA)
The Consultant shall administer a program of QA procedures for producing
quality work. Specific procedures shall cover, but not be limited to,
planning, coordination, checking, reviewing, and scheduling the work.
All documents prepared by the Consultant shall be subject to the
Consultant's in-house procedures prior to submittal to the Districts for
review. Each submittal shall be accompanied by a written statement from
the principal-in-charge of the project which states that the documents have
been reviewed and indicates who has checked the documents being
submitted.
Substitution of the project manager by the Consultant will require the
approval of the Districts. The project is subject to cancellation if this
approval is not obtained by the Districts.
�./ -11-
The Consultant must provide a statement acknowledging that no kickbacks,
fees or remuneration of any type may be received from any manufacturer or
supplier for which a recommendation is made on the project.
In submitting a proposal, the Consultant must acknowledge that the proposal
is based on a comprehensive and complete review of the request for
proposal including this scope of work which is an attachment to the request
for proposal.
Vill. SCHEDULE
The tentative schedule for this project is as follows:
• Approval of Professional Services Agreement: DAY 1
• Completion of Needs Assessment Technical Memorandum: DAY 1 + 8
MONTHS
Completion of Phase II and III Scope of Work: DAY 1 + 9 MONTHS
The Consultant shall develop a graphic schedule to display the proposed
schedule above with milestones identified. This schedule must be revised
and submitted monthly with the monthly project status report.
STAFF ASSISTANCE
The Districts' staff member assigned to work with the Consultant on the project
is Wendy Sevenandt, (714) 962-2411.
wpdo6eng\1-25-1\sow
-12- `�
•t COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
' 1O ELL6 AVENUE
Eo W.Va y..t K)R u SM84127
!� aluacx-Xlt
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
APRIL 14, 1993 - 7:30 P.M.
u
a
� FUND NO 9199 - JT DISI WORKING UFITAE PROCESSING GATE 3/G4/93 FAGS 1
COUNTY
NUMtlLR AV93
COUNTY ILAT SANITATION DISTRICTS
OS OF ORANGE COUNTT
CLAIMS PAID L3/10/93 POSTING OAiE u3/1C/93
a
WARRANT N0. yENUUN AMOUNT Bt5CP1%ION
128330 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES $804.8. SERVICE AGREEMENT
;I 128331 AMERICAN 7LLEPHOhL 6 IELE6PAPH 11.3.3.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
r 128332 " ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP 125.710.OG ENGINE TESTING SERVICES M.0.11-18-92
. 128333 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC 471.70 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS
128334 ALFA-LAVAL INC 4170.a4 BOOK
126335 ALLIED SUPPLY CO S078.89 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
�. 126336 BLAKE P ANDERSON 5144.91 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT
n 128337 A-FLU$ SYSTEMS $4,138.41 NOTICES 6 ADS
Cl 12831E APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS INC $145.71 LAS SUPPLIES
IT7 fib. 128339 ABC LABORATORIES $235.00 LAB SERVICES
z 128340 ARATEA SERVICES INC 35.000.87 UNIFORM RENTALS
t7 128341 ARMOR - VAC 1.47.6. VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
n ® 128342 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC 1494.15 WASTE MAULING FEES
128343 ART WORKS $18.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES
m - 128344 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. 1I.236.00 WASTE OIL REMOVAL
3 r 128345 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CU $506.43 TRUCK PARTS
120346 AWARDS A TROPHIES $140.85 AWARDS 6 PLAQUES
3t - 128347 BIT PORTABLE SERVICES $85.31 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
W 9 12834E BAN LANDFILL 1/.665.64 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
128349 BRY SAFETY 6 SUPPLY $1,133.86 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128350 BAKER PLYWOOD CG INC 51.927.13 BUILDING MATERIALS
�. 128351 BARCLAYS LAY PUBLISHERS 1243.60 BOOKS
r 128352 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 1709.82 BATTERIES
128353 BAKER COMPRESSOR 1684.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES
O 128354 BAAIER DIAGNOSTICS INC 14.953.61 LAB SUPPLIES
N 1288355 BEACH PAVING INC. 34.200.00 PAVING SERVICES
128356 DON C BEATTIE P.E. $200.60 MACHINE REPAIRS
• 128357 BELL SECURITY $15.76b.30 TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES
12835E YT DILLARD INC 5225.41 MACHINE REPAIRS
" -- 128359 -' BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. 38tl.37 LAB SUPPLIES
N - 128360 BISHOP COMPANY $212.45 TOOLS
128361 BOLh RINGER MANNHEIM $233.19 LAB SUPPLIES
128362 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE $38.60 RADIATOR REPAIRS
0 128363 BORNEMANN PUMPS. INC $22,903.26 PUMP PARTS
228364 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP 435.973.85 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-20
` - 128365 BRLNNER-FIEDLER L ASSOC IN $173.47 PUMP PARTS
128366 BROOKLYN THERMOMEIL6 Cu IN $109.55 LAB SUPPLIES
128367 BUILDER-S EMPORIUM $i9.49 HARDWARE/LUMBER
128368" THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFF 1465.00 SUBSCRIPTION
� . 128369 BURKE ENGINEERING CO 1,34.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS
128370 GARY G SYNCED $5,308.13 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
" 228371 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY 170b.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES
. 128372 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS. IML $3,361.53 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128373 IS COMPANY 41.357.22 VALVE PARTS
-" 1283Ti 2993 CWPCA CONFLKENCE $2.232.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
1. 120375 CAL-FAC CHCMICAL CO INC $237.69 CHEMICALS
n FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/C4/93 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP93
_ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF GRANGE COUNTY
�i .. CLAIMS FAIU 03/10/93 POSTING OgTC 43/10/97
WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
128376 CALTROL INC 35..8 O.91 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
128377 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC GATE $312.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128378 JOHN CAROLLO EMCINEERS $9.161.L5 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36
128379 CENTURY SAFETY 1NST 1 SUFP S8.o96.OS SAFETY SUPPLIES
128380 BRUCE CHAPMAN 45.000.LG DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
128381 CLARK CONSULTANTS 5308C.G: CONSULTING SERVICES
r 128382 COLICH AND SONS $9629241,60 CONSTRUCTION I-9
n 128383 COMMUNICATIONS CENTER 1585.b9 2-WAY RADIO EQUIPMENT
228384 COMPRESSOR COMPONLNTS OF CA 33.136.7b PUMP PARTS
m 0 128385 COMPUSA, INC. 1274.57 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
Z 129386 CONNELL GM PARIS / DIV $50.91 TRUCK PARTS
D 126387 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL GIST S4.926.73 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
128388 CONSOLIDATED FREIWHIWAVS 1452.8b FREIGHT CHARGES
12b389 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 52.764.DL TOOLS
128390 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $,.6:6.15 CHLORINE
3 A. 128391 CONTINCNTAL GRAFHICS s120.3. OFFICE SUPPLIES
126392 CONTROLCO 1602.3b ELECTRIC PARTS
# 228393 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $584.24 TRUCK PARTS
00 , 128394 COSTAR CONF SEB6.77 LAB SUPPLIES
128395 COUNTY WHOLESALE LLECINIC 15'..63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
1 128396 CHARLES P CRUWLEV CO 5376.2L INSTRUMENT PARTS
128397 OML INC 31.3b4.67 ENGINE PARTS
n 128398 0 6 S CONVEYORS $1.332.60 CONVEYOR REPAIRS
f— 128399 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 3466.56 TIRES
O • 128460 DAPPER TIRL 4742.40 TIRES
126401 PETER C DAVID Cu 5172.32T.24 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2
(n 1284C2 PETER C DAVID CU $1.3,654.17 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2
128403 DEAVLR MANUFACTURING CO. 1327.65 TRUCK PARTS
A 128404 DECRA-TREND 1199.0 HARDWARE
128495 BE GIIELLE & SONS GLASS CO $29.09 BUILDING MATERIALS
128406 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 53.750.51 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-12-92
In - 128407 DIFILIPPO ASSGCIAILS $677.21 PRINTING
'- 128408 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 5751.04 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
' 128409 SYCON CORP $137.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128410 DISCO PRINT COMPANY $2.13b.94 OFFICE FURNITURE
128411 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN $13,810.66 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL
_ 128412 DURADO ENTERPRISLS INC $44#972,16 PLANT MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS
128413 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANT Sb2O.OG SERVICE AGREEMENT
128414 OURO-SENSE CORP 1177.bb MECHANICAL PARTS
220415 EASTMAN INC 52.940.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128416 FCOANALYSIS INC 5220.06 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91
128417 ECONOMICS FREES INC $2,704.50 PUBLICATIONS
128415 EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SPEC 1659.86 EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS
128419 ELECT AIN TOOL CU $2,973.69 MECHANICAL PARTS
128420 ELECTRU DYNAMIC SERVICES $3.220.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ELECTRICAL
A 128422 ENCHANTER INC 11,480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92
ri
W I_
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PNDLLSSINb DATE 3/U4/93 PAGE 3
FEF ORT NUMBER AP44
Y _ COUNTY SANITATIONDISTR ICI3 OF uDANUE COUNTY
L�I•I .., _, ., .. CLAIMS FAIU i313/1U/9] POSTING GATE C3/lC/93
WARRANT N01 yEFUOfl AHDUNI DLSCRI-IION
128422 ESSENCE GROUP 6399.21 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
I : 128423 CHARLES EVANS A ASSOC. 3820041.UC LAB SERVICES M.O.11-18-92
128424 FALCON DISPOSAL SERyICL 331e40.LG RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
122425 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP S96.CG AIR FREIGHT
128426 FISCHER A PORTER CO 35r253.Cb CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
126427 FISHER SCIEN71FIC Co ab.bU4.27 LAB SUPPLIES
128426 FISONS INSTRUMENTS i2b2.9a LAB SUPPLIES
128429 FLO-SYSTEMS $3129L.07 PUMP PARTS
G'1 128436 FLUID HANOLINU SYSTEMS 5116.LU PUMP PARTS
m ■ 128431 FLUID TECH $956.66 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
Z 128432 FOLSOM LAKE FORD 310.506.24 VEHICLE M.O.4-8-92
CJ
y 128434 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 470b.63 FILM
128435 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $170.12 PAINT SUPPLI88
m 128435 FOE INDUSTRIAL SALES 31]0.12 MECHANICAL PARTS
m - 128437 RE OM IMAGING
CO s3.$57.92 INSTRUMENT PARTS
3 120438 - FREEDOM INFULLE $25.53 WATERSERVICE AGREEMENT
# 128439 CITY OF FULLER TON 325.53 WATER RUSE
E
128440 GARRATAbL LUMBER CU 311128.11 HARDWACHEMICALS
128441 GARRATT-IBERGLAS COMPANY
INSTALLERS
NSTAL i3.943.81 CHEMICALS
I 128442 GATES R FIBERGLASS INSTALL LCO 51,021.5. PUMP PARTS
128443 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. a1.024.50 ELECTRIC SUPPLI88
128444 GENERAL TELEPHONE CU $224.3L TELEPHONE SERVICES
r 128445 LIFE TECHNOLOGIES/6INC 0/BhL i168.54 LAB SUPPLIES
128446 SICRLICH-NITCHLLL INC ix.436.54 FILM
PARTS
C7 ■ 128447 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 5330.80 FILM
128448 OBN GREEN 3 ASSOCIATES 32.245.G.. SURVEYING 86RVICE9 M.0.6-10-92
128449 - HAARER EQUIPMENT CO 4875.3U TRUCE PARTS
128450 EACH SIGN
aL 136.43 LAB SUPPLI88
C"1 128451 PARR INGTDN INUUSTRI AL {LASTI a136.43 ELECTRIC PARTS
128452 PC HAWN CO INC S586.09 COMPRESSOR
PARTS
N - 128453 MOEH HUGHE CVO CALIF INC ,709.25 COMPRESSOR PARTS
129454 RS MUGHES CO INC 11,032.50 PAINT SUPPLIES
126455 CITY OF HU BEACH ON BEACH i11.032.50 WATER
FFIC USE
1 128456 IMPERIAL
BEACH NUBBLE SIA 330.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128457 INDUSTRI WEST INFORMATION
xI iJ64133.00 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0,11-15-92
128457 -- INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ATION CO.YTN$ a1]3.00 SAFES
128458 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SHOE C a3$068.56 SAFETY SHOES
12646D INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS .266.13 CONNECTORS
_ 128461 INGRAM PAPER $11166.94 OFFICE SUPPLI88
• 128462 IRVINE RANCH .SATERANI R151SIC1 $665.1. JATERNITORIAL
USE
RI
128463 JGRLAIENSE WESTERN INSTRUMENTS
SUPP S685.1. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
128463 JOHNST 1N S TRUXEN TB CO a105.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS
. 120465 JONESTOCH SUPPLY 3186.43 ELECTRIC PARTS
12P465 JORD$ CHEMICALS INC 32.$78.46 CHEMICALS
INSTRUMENT
126467 - RELL AN CONTROLS INC 737.46 INSTRUMENT
� 12b46T xELLY F1PE COCY $737.]0 PLUMBING SUPPLI69
W _
Y FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST VOPMING CAI'i IAL PROCLSSINb DAIL 3/64/93 PAGE 4
-!� REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
.I CLAIMS PAID 13/10/93 PUSTIN6 DATE 63/1./93
�1
WARRANT NO. VLNUUR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
12P468 KING BEARING INC $4,234.14 MACHINE SUPPLIES
128469 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPFLIL4 s1.39E.44 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128470 MARTIN KORDICK SR S2,041.94 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
128471 LA TRONICS S47b.19 CAMERA
126472 LAYMANr JONES 1 DYE. LAWVEKS >1.615u5 LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER INDUSTRIES
128473 LEGI-TECH $320.U0 COMPUTER SERVICES
op 128474 LECO CORPORATION 49b2.99 LAB SUPPLIES
n 12B475 LEW CO ELECTRIC CN 1334.6E TRUCK PARTS
128476 LIEBER7 CORPORATION 1S64.74 FREIGHT
m AA 126477 COUNTY SANITATION OISIMILT 1139r964.LG POOLED EHIS. ESTIM. PLAN M.0.12-13-89
2 128478 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $933.33 OCEAN MONITORING
' 128479 KPS 91b.44 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
. 126480 MACOMCu >320.bb SERVICE AGREEMENT
12B4B1 MAb11ETEK NATIONAL LLECTRIL ".657.L3 ELECTRIC PARTS
—1 126482 MAN 7EK 9323.42 JANITORIAL SUPPLIER
3 _ 120403 "ARVAC ELECTRONICS $150.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
-
128484 MATT CHLUN INC SI.556.96 VALVE PARTS
128485 MCCOV SHEET METAL WORKS IN $189.64 ELECTRIC PARTS
00 128486 MICNOAGE uF CEMRIIUS >3.527.14 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
128487 MIDWAY MFG G MACHINING >2.370.5u MECHANICAL PARTS
12848E MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $190.82 FITTINGS
128489 MISSION INDUSTRIES s1.724.66 SAFETY SUPPLIES
n 128490 MITCHCLL INSTRU"ENT CD 3969.46 ELECTRIC PARTS
r 128491 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION 3297.10B.0G CONSTRUCTION 2-30
�y AN 128492 NATIONAL FIRE PNOTLCTIUII AS $569.22 SAFETY SUPPLIES
120493 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES I4L .756.06 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
CF1 - 128494 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL S138.70 SAFETY FILM RENTALS
A i 128495 CITY OF NLWPORI HLACX 32c.2e WATER USE
12B496 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SEPV ICLS 3515.51 SAFETY GLASSES
126497 - THE OMMART COMP $1,292.15 INSTRUMENT PARTS
- - 12849E DA SVSILKS CO 134.4G1.Ob CHLORINE M.0.30-9-91
Cn 120499 ORACLE CORPORATION >700.b4 TRAINING REGISTRATION
128500 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL 3131.19 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
r 128501 ORANGE COAST PETROLLUM EGUIF $.340.6. TRUCK PARTS
128502 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO, FARTS C SN1.20 TRUCK PARTS
126503 ORANGE COURIER S261.6C FREIGHT
* 128501 04AN6E VALVL G F1171kb CU. 11.239.22 FITTINGS
128505 OR 6 ANON TEKNIIIA >1u2.36 LAS SUPPLIES
128506 ORITEK CORP SI.812.10 PUMP PARTS
128907 OXYGEN SLAVICL Scru41.98 SPECIALTY GASES
12B50B COG N 7V SANITATION UISTRICT S1r9BB.14 WORKERS COMP INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
128509 PSI .153.62 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
9 128510 PS SI 41.32b.50 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
128511 PACIFIC FARTS >449.31 INSTRUMENT
128512 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $1.195.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES
� . 228523 PACIFIC BELL 3453.2E TELEPHONE SERVICES
a
FUND NO 9159 - JT DIST WORKING CA{IiAI PROCESSING DATL 3/.4/93 PAGE 5
ALPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY NUMBER AP93
CLAIMS PAID .3/10/93 POSTING DATE 03/16/93
WARRANT NO. VLNDUN AMOUNT uESCR1PTlON
• /. 128511 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C 668.44 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
•.I 128515 PACTEL MERIDIAN SVSTLMS $1,627.5. TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
128516 PADRE JANITORIAL BUFF 52.192.79 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
. I 128517 PAK WEST 51.132.88 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
228510 PALMIERI. T1LEA, WIENER, 6b63.b5 LEGAL SERVICES 14-1-IA
128519 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES
126520 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION 65.1.25 LAB SUPPLIES
or. 128521 PTTNIY BOWES 6530..O SERVICE AGREEMENT
G") 126522 PITNEY BOWLS CREDIT LORP S163.18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE
FTI 128523 POLYMI,TNICS. INC. 51.13W.05 SERVICE AGREEMENT
z I28524 POLYFURE INC s p li$161.75 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
n 128525 POWER ON SLABS
SUPPLY CO $228.40 LLBCTRIC SUPPLIES
P 128521 PRECISION IS IOb SLABS BLOWING 322tl.10 LAB BUPPLIB3
128527 bAROLD PRIMR 4SE ICE 5126.06 ICE
m h . 128529 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $4,160.04 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
3 128529 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS 5..334.83 ELECTRIC PARTS
128530 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO 13.138.82 TRASH REMOVAL
128531 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO 4121.41 LAB SUPPLIES
d 128532 RECYC INC $29,467.95 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91
128533 REMOTE MLTER NLSETTINR SVST 65.0E0.00 POSTAGE
120534 COMMUNITY BUSINESS WMAPMILS 61.5.1G PRINTING
3. 126535 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $1.926.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
r 126536 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CORP $73.96 LAB SUPPLIES
128537 REWES ENGINEERING CO 59.868.75 HARDWARE
t7 , 128530 RICH COLOR LAO 529.63 PRINTING
N 128539 ROCKWELL ENGINLERING 6 EWUIF $1,452.60 MACHINE PARTS
126540 RODNEY-HUNT CO $3,733.54 BAR SCREEN PARTS
-y O 128541 ROSEMOUNT INC. S%29.69 ELECTRIC PARTS
L28542 RYAN-NERCO 61.W00.13 ELECTRIC METER
128543 SAFEIV-KLEEN CORP 52.653.61 PARTS CLEANER
N 128511 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 31..32.66 PLUNGING SUPPLIES
128545 SANWA WAWK 543.912.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30
128546 DOUG SARVIS 51.125.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
0 128547 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT-L 531:.6SB.55 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92
128548 SLIMED A CORP $156.50 LAB SUPPLIES
128549 SCO77 SPECIALTY GASES INC 6733.7V SAFETY SUPPLIES
128550 SEA COAST DESIGNS 41.b L9.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128551 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $723.06 LAB SUPPLIES
128552 SHASTA ELECTRIC SIC.5/3.60 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
• 128553 SHURELUCK SALES 62.143.12 HARDWARE
128554 SILVERS INSTRUMENTATION 6347.50 LAB SUPPLIES
128555 SIGMA CHEMICAL CU $269.09 LAB SUPPLIES
128556 SKYPARA WALK-IN MEDICAL ELI $464.66 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
128557 SLIDE MASTER $77.50 PRESENTATION AIDS
'12BSSB SMITH PIPE A SUPPLY INC 6i75.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
- 128559 $0 COAST RIK QUALITY $15.056.40 PERMIT FEES
A
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/4./93 PAGE 6
0
y REPORT NUNbER AP93
_ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF'y OANGC COUNTY CLAIMS FA10 43/1 G/93 POSTING DATE 63/16/93
WARRANT N0. VENDOR AMOUNT ULSCR1P710N
126560 SCAGMD UPOATL TRAINING S1GS.U. TRAINING REGISTRATION
126561 SOUTHERN CALIF CUISON CO F25.696.82 POWER
128562 SO CAL GAS CO 340.60A.67 NATURAL GAS
128563 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO 41.314.86 DIESEL FUEL
120564 SOUVENIR PHO70 $19.55 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
128565 SPARKLETTS OPINKIN4 U47ER st.h DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
128566 SPARLINb INSTRUMENT CO INC 42.9b9.15 METER
y 128567 STAMEN 2 SPASSOFF FL i5.95G.UO ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-162
C1 128566 WESTALLOY INC $1,043.35 HARDWARE
m 126569 SPEAKER SUPPORT $72.73 PRESENTATION AIDS
Z 128570 EPEE INOU5TRIES INC $579.39 LAB SUPPLIES -
C7 128571 SRECO FLExIBLE S484.96 TRUCK PARTS
n
128573 BT ANC0S5 VACUUN SNP YCE $2.072.57 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
128574 JAMCS STAWFI LL CON811UCE ION >1.900.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
fYl 128579 STEAMERS TN EC SCPVICE i000.00 LANDSCAPING
3 _ 12N575 SUMMIT STEEL s984.64 METAL
120576 SUPELCO INC $103.31 LAB SUPPLIES
4E 128517 SUPER CHEM CDRP YL..0 w 19 CHEMICALS
OD ' 12 B579 SUPER ICE COMP $82.82 LAB SUPPLIES
128579 TAYLGR-DUNN MFG COMPANY SV20.33 TRUCK PARTS
120580 TECH SYSTEMS 4211.53 TRUCK PARTS
D 12B581 CHARLES E THOMAS 4818.21 TRUCK PARTS
r 12BSb2 TXON PSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY IL.968.2U
r MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
128583 TONY-S LOCK L SAFE SLRVICE 3268.7i KEYS AND LOCKS
C7 A 12858E TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL 1179.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES
N 128565 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO s7.238.77 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.11-13-91
129586 WESTRONICS i125.9b INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
128587 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES $138.60 TRAVEL SERVICES
128568 TRAVLL TRAVEL $143.00 TRAVEL SERVICES -
t, 1285B9 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY INC . 31.552.6E TRUCK PARTS
s' 128590 JG TUCKER 6 SON INC $2,507.67 INSTRUMENT
N ~ 128591 UHLER. INC $102.065.65 CONSTRUCTION 5-32
128592 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $269.06 LAB SUPPLIES
d 128593 UNOCAL 3121.52 UNLEADED GASOLINE
128594 UNITED PPRCLL SLRVICE 3V00.30 PARCEL SERVICES
128595 DATAVAULT U S SAFE DEPOSIT CO. i1.405.L: COMPUTER DATA STORAGE
12859E VG/FISIONS INSTRUMENTS 19.299.53 1" EQUIPMENT
128597 VVR SCIENTIFIC $6.979.67 LAB SUPPLIES
128598 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CU $6.676.47 PLUMBING PARTS
• 128599 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS sE96.U7 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128600 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $164.29 LAB SUPPLIES
128601 VARNER ACOUSTICS. INC. $1.405.44 BUILDING MATERIALS
. 12BEG2 VAUGHAN COMPANY S4.901.25 PUMP PARTS
126603 VEANE'S PLUMBING s210.0C PLUMBING SERVICES
128609 VERTEX SYSTEMS Stl.G31.54 - COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
128645 WA TER POLLUTION CONTROL 319.91 BOOK
V
FUND NO 9199 - JT DISI WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/C4/93 PAbE 7
REPORT NUN tlER AP43
LUUNTY SANITA71ON DISTRICTS OF URANLC COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 43/14/93 POSTING RAIL 43/16/93
t WARRANT NO. VLNDUR AMOUNT 3ESCRIPTION
�! 128606 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEU. 129.69 PUBLICATION
.� 128607 WESTERN INDUSTRIAL TLCHNOLOGY 32.1bb.69 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
" 128606 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUf PLY 319.962.90 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92
128669 WEST PUBLISHING COMPANY 3110.42 PUBLICATION
128610 WITL6 $515.76 LAS SUPPLIES
128611 ROURKE 4 G400RUFF f UM $56.152.50 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92
120612 XEROX CORP $14.409.39 COPIER LEASES
128613 GEORGE YARDLEY CO 3642.71 VALVES
n' _�-' 128614 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $356.7, INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
m 128615 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA COMP 3868.63 CHART PAPER
t:1 128616 IILUARTH f ALPER/C.S. ALLEN $16,096.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1
n -----------------
TOTAL CLAIMS FALB O3/10/93 33.073.814.9b
# SUMMARY AMOUNT
00
99
M2 CAP RFAC NFUND ,365.00
E$25,267.00
03 CAP
FUND 275,981.36
51
n R3 CAP FAC FUND i2$1,026.94 -
f— R5 OPER FUND 82,068.05
45 CAPOPEN
FAC FUND f$4,029.03
07 CAP
FUND 36,066.89
Cn 07 CAP PAC FUND f36$821.30
411 OPEN FUND $328.00
414 CAP FAC FUND f$66.00
f14 OPEN FUND 863.00
414 'CAP FAC FUND ,079.98
(n 4586 CAP
POND 19,041.95
4566 CAP FAC FUND f$2,303.10
' 4E67 OPEN FUND $7,747.69
47814 OPEN FUND 77,446.08
JT OPEN FUND ,421,117.07
-' C'ORF E1,921,117.67
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $1,988.14
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $179,797.23
a $3,073,814.97
V
CO
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST MURKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 1
r. �. REPORT NUMBER AP43 1� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 PUSTING DATE 03/24/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
128651 AG TECH COMPANY $137.149.9.
RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
..__ 128652_- A T L T 13.820.73 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
126653 ACLU-LABS RESEARCH INC $150.00 LAS SERVICES
128654 ADVANCED COOLING TECHNOLOGIES 5424.64 CHILLER REPAIRS
128655 AIR PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL IN 334.bb4." O&M AGREEMENT OKY. GEN. SYST M.O.8-9-85
128656 ALLIED SUFPLY CO $1,258.15 VALVE
r 128657 AMBER STEEL 'COMPANY S&U.00 PLAN 6 SPECS BEFORE)
12865E _ AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE CULLLLIN $99.75 LAB SUPPLIES
G� 128659 AMENSHAM CORP $326.70 LAB SUPPLIES
m 128660 ANAHEIM SEDER CONSTRUCTION 166J.OL EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIRS - DIST 7
129661 ANIATCR - DISTRIBUTION $426.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES
y 120662 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL 4230.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128663 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 1374.79 NOTICES A ADS
128669 APPLIED tl105YSTEXS INC 34.649.73 LAB SUPPLIES _
m _ 128665 ACE UPPLIED COMPUTCR SOLUTION $145.60 CUMPUTER SUPPLIES
3 128666 ABC LABORATORIES $1,395.00 LAB SUPPLIES
128667 _ ARATEA SERVICES INC 12.56 UNIFORM SERVICE
12866E AMENS INDUSTRIES INC $3,643.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
128669 ARI20NA INSTRUMENT i2.691.31 INSTRUMENT
I _ 128670 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC $450.U4 HASTE HAULING FEE
128671 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. 4136.00 MASTS OIL REMOVAL - - -
r 10. 228672 AMSA $12,803.00 MEMBERSHIP DUBS M.O.1-13-92.
128673 ATLHISON TOFEKA 6 SANTA FL MR 3150.O0 SUPPLY AGREEMENT
-- 128674-- AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSIN6 $7.553.25 PAYROLL PROCESSING SERVICES
[7 , . 129675 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC S518.29 TRUCK PARTS
(lf 128676 BRA LANDFILL $2,766.46 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
128677 BRN SAFETY 6 SUPPLY 447.05 SAFETY SUPPLIER '
128678 BANANA BLUEPRINT $15,465.79 BLUSPRINTING SERVICES
129679 BANK GF AMERICA $1.203.67 DEFERRED COMP TRANSFER
(1 128680 BARCLAYS LAN PUBLISHERS $177.20 PUBLICATION - -
N
128661 B BATEMAN Sb75.UO DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128683 BATTERY SPECIALTIES $190.64 BATTERCMPFUGI88
128684 - BAUER COMPRESSOR 4TI 1190.64 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS
12B68S BEATER PAYING
INC. INC 47.412.66 LAB SUPPLIES
Y- — 198669 _ _ BEACH PAVING INC. $19.347.38 PAVING PLRVIC69
128687 BELL SE INSTRUMENTS 49.39T.]0 LAB SUPPLIES
128688 BELL SECURITY SS1161.07 TEMPORARY SECURITY 88RVIC88
12868E 810-PAL LABORATORIES $550.00 LAB SUPPTRAINING
IES
REGISTRATION
- 128690 BIONECLAN ATION SYMPOSIUM 1550.00 TRAINING RBGISTIIATION
��• 128691 BORNE XA NN PUMPS, INC PUMPS3$5,099.35 EGIN
____128691 BOYLE -FIEDLERINO CUSP 45$212.67 ENGINEERING 88RVIC88 7-19
128693 BRENNER-F TELLER 6 ASSOC IN ,026.59 ILECTRICNT RUPPLIEB
128694 BRIINIAUT LLECTR IL $2,272.00 INSTRUMENT
PARTS
_ __ 128694 _ BROWN AUTOMATION L2$201.00 INRTRUMBNT PARTS
L -128696 BUILDER-S ENGINEERING
$774.73 MARDNARK/LUMARR
128696 BURKE ENOINEEPIN6 CO Y714.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS
n
FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3118/93 PAGE 2
N REPORT NUMBER AP43
_ ...... _..._ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS FAIR u3/14/93 POSTING DATE u3/E4/93
VAh WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DCSCRIPIION
11 L� 128697 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC 312r19 B.uJ SURVEY SERVICES RBS 5-051
128690 BUSINESS LAGS INC $53.00 BOON
128699 GARY 6 STREED $2.356.84 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
i •� 126700 CPC PRESS INC $87.45 BOOKS
128101 CS COMPANY $4.248.10 VALVE
128702 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC Sb84.65 TRUCK PARTS
` 10 128703 CALIF SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL 185.V6 MEMBERSHIP DUES
1287G4 CARLETON ENGINEERS $11,326.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
m 128705 CENTURY SAFETY INST 8 SUPP l2.651.85 SAFETY SUPPLIES
Fri 128706 CHURCH ENGINEERING INC $5.109.82 ENGINERRING SERVICES 2-9-RI
128707 COLE-PARNER INSTRUMENT CO 4344.53 LAB SUPPLIES
C7 128708 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS Of CA *"078.5u MECHANICAL PARTS
D 124709 COMPUSA. INC. $987.85 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
128710 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIV 3120.38 TRUCK PARTS
—I 120711 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 412.025.29 ELECTRIC PARTS
3 128712 CONTINENTAL AIR IDOLS INC $5.346.39 TOOLS
128713 CONTROL CABLES INC $196.b7 TRUCK PARTS
7t 128714 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $5,740.63 CONSULTING SERVICES
00 128715 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS ilr[71.30 TRUCK PARTS
12B 716 CR TSTAL CLEAR MIND ON MAINT. $2,250.00 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES
_ 128727 CAL POLY KELLOGG UNIT $215.50 TRAINING REGISTRATION
y 228719 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL 46.72 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEES
T— 128719 DAILY PILOT 34D.U0 NOTICES 6 ADS
r 128720 J.Y. DIANGELO CO INC $7.515.57 PIPE
C7 M 128721 DE ANZA CORPORATION $150.U& RENTAL EQUIPMENT
228722 DEAVER MANUFACTURIN4 CO. $19.64 TRUCK PARTS
Cn •• 128T23 DELTA TECH SERVICE INC 314.008.b5 HIGH VOLUME OIL FLUSH
IN 229724 DEZURIH AND/OR CS CO $11,290.35 VALVE
128725 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATLS $2,395.56 PRINTING
.y 128726 - DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 39.953.60 9ERVICE AGREEMENT
—�j A 126727 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN $1074.51 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL
Cn 12Bi28 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $11.582.99 PLANT MAINTENANCE 8 REPAIRS
198729- - ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC - $20.000.00 INSURANCE DEPOSIT
� .. 120730 DOWN EDWARDS CORF $767.72 PAINT SUPPLIES
_126731 EASTMAN INC $4.659.G8 OFFICE SUPPLIES
12$732 ECOANALYSIS INC $5.081.09 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91
128733 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES $3r680.00 SNGINEERING SERVICES - ELECTRICAL
128134 EMED $67.5b SAFETY SUPPLIES
128735 - ENCHANTER INC 45.140.00 OCEAN MONITORING 6-10-92
) 128736 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC $862.00 LAB SERVICES
128737 MARSHALL FAIRRES 3128.Ca DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
12813B FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 15r2DO.60 RESIDUAL$ REMOVAL H.O.10-9-91
128739 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP 4485.75 AIR FREIGHT
128740 FERRELLGAS $122.56 PROPANE
128741 FISCH ER 6 PORTER CO $6,782.68 CHLORINATION PARTS
128742 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 1.7.635.45 LAB SUPPLIES
to
N
t
I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE 3/18193 PAGE 3
REPORT
!� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY NUMBER AP91
CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTIN4 DATL 63/24/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT UESLRIPTION
n 120743 FISONS INSTRUMENTS S124.64 LAB SUPPLIES
_ 128744 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. 5:50.6u CONCRETE CUTTING
128745 _ FLO-SYSTEMS $6,157.46 MRCHANICAL PARTS
. ��• 128146 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS 476.05 PUMP PARTS
129747 FLUID TECHNOLOGIES $265.25 OIL TESTING SERVICES
128746 CLIFFORD A FORKERT S6012.25 SURVEYING SERVICE SPEC S-051
129749 FOSS MARITIME CO S1.062.0L JANITORIAL SERVICES
128750 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $299.78 FILM
m I28751 - FOUNTAIN VALLEY - PAINT $243.87 PAINT SUPPLIES
m rD 128752 BUD FRET 921.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
120753 CITY OF FULLERTON s30.6b WATER USE
D � - - - -- 128154 GANAHL LUMBER CO 3101.98 LUMBER/HARDWARE
i 228755 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS s6.943.5u PIPE
128756 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $172.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
128751 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO s4.550.65 TELEPHONE SERVICES
m 128758 TOM GERLINGER sb.UOO.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
3 128759 N GLANT2 8 SON S24.96 PAINT SUPPLIES
3t 226760 GOV•T FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $355.06 MEMBERSHIP DUES
CO L26761 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $233.23 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
1 128762 _ GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $5.624.26 FILM
r 128763 HSU TECHNOLOGY $152.624.86 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2
a w ... 128764 FRED A HARPER $1,500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION .
128765 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL FLASTI $1,082.46 VALVE
r 1 �•( 128766 - HASCO OIL CO INC $147.40 OIL 8 GREASE
tj 126767 HAULAWAY CONTAINERS s1.b20.04 CONTAINER RENTALS
_ _ 126768 _ PL HAWN CU INC $1.940.36 FILTERS _
N 120769- IPYIN XAYDO CN $135.00 REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT '
�'. 128770 HEWLETT PACMARD $1,111.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128771 _ HILTI INC $197.78 TOOLS
n 126772 HI STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE - $81.89 TRUCK PARTS
_ 126773 HOEKBIGEA CVS CALIF INC s125.87 COMPRESSOR PARTS
Cn 12F774 _ RS HUGHES CO INC $1.540.75 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
128775 HUNTER CORPORATION $154.116.89 CONSTRUCTION J-29-1
129776 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA $27.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128777 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCXWINN C $130.14 BICYCLE PARTS
128776 ISC S9.026.50 INSTRUMENTATION CONSULTING
128779 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL S64.717.3C FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92
12P 780 INDUSTRIAL THNE AGED PRUDUCTS $95.UI CONNECTORS
126781 INGRAM PAPER $280.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES
�. 128782 INTERSTATE BATTCRY SYSTEMS 41.087.3U BATTERIES
128783 JLA CREDIT CORP 3145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE
128784 GRLAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP s883.38 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
128785 JAYS CATERING 6393.29 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE
_ 126786 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO s910.33 HARDWARE
128T87 JIM•S SUSPENSION SERVICE $50.00 TRUCK REPAIRS
yl 128188 KAMAN HEARINGS 6 SUPPLY 492.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
tw
W
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 4
REPOhT NUMBER AP43
E
.. .. COUNTY
CLAI S FAIAl6ON DISTRICTS OF DDATEL COUNTY
3/Z4/9
CLAIMS FA1U 63/24/93 POSTING GATE 43/i4/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT UESCkIPTION
#1, ; 120709 KARCHER INSULATION ING $1.900.06
:.` 120790 KEENAN 8 ASSOCIATES $2.475.60 ELECTRIC PARTS
128791 XING BEARING INC $4,452.01 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128792 KNOB 1NUUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $9,413.41 MACHINE SUPPLIES
129793 MARTIN KORDICK SR $2,900.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128794 LA CELLULAk TELEPHONE CO $69.48 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
228795 LEE A NO CONSULTING LN6N 511.306.24 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES -
a 126796 KP LINDSTROM INC 54.93i.E0 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5
G•1 128797 SOCO-LYNCH CORP $156.26 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL
_ fil128190 MPS $2b1.64 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
tp 120T99 MACDONALD-STEFMENS LAB 511.210.00 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
D 128AOC MACOMCO 5520.65 LAB SERVICES
128801 MARVAC ELECTRUNICS S62.bb SERVICE AGREEMENT
1288G2 _ MATT - CHLOR INC $7.164.32 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
ITT 04 - 126803 MCWAIN INSTRUMENTS $41.72 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
3 128804 MICRO MOTION 11.431.27 LAB SUPPLIES
128005 MIDWAY MFS S MACHINING $12.647.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
. 128806 MINE, SAFETY APPLIANCES CO 6,25.5. BUILDING REPAIRS
00 128067 MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES 1472.W1 SAFETY SUPPLIES
i 128666 JAMES M MONTGOMERY Sl Ui.721.9b MELDING SUPPLIES
128809 JM MONTGOMERY ENGINEERS 33,124.28 ENGINEERING SERVICES M.0.12-12-90
IF
- 126810 TOM MOORE $3.975.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
�.. 128811 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC 91,567.56 CONSULTING SERVICES
126012 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
t$ , 128813 NEWARK ELECTRONICS 5126.bN SAFETY FILM RENTAL
y 128814 OCR REPROGRAi NICS INC $121.22 ELECTRIC PARTS
128815 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICLS 5685.44 LAB SUPPLIES
A - 126816 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIUk SEE S7.O62.69 SAFETY GLASSES
_ 128817 DX SYSTEMS CO Sc991,33.42 OFFICE PARTITIONS
C-1 128818 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL 936.72 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91'
128819 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C /344.9h ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
_ 128820 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUFPLV C 678.96 TRUCK PARTS
w 128821 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. 41,444.27 GROUNDSKESPIHG SUPPLIES
128822 OXYGEN SERVICE 52.611.01 FITTINGS
128823 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 43,612.17 SPECIALTY GASSES
128024 CSODC SELF-FU14UED MEDICAL 1 •260.006.40 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128825 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT ST.O67.39 PREMIUM ADVANCE
128826 ROBERT L CITRON 1168.64 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT
126827 - PACIFIC PARTS $3,931da 92/93 PROPERTY TAX
128828 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 9876.03 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
i.. 128829 PACIFIC BELL 651.68 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128830 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIDNING C $68.44 TELEPHONE SERVICES
128831 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS $429.19 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
128832 PADRE JANITORIAL SUTV s4N2.72 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
129633 PAGENET 567.5b JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
126834 PAK WEST i547.10 PAGER RENTAL
�• JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
CA
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WURKING CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE 3118193 PALL 5
L y j •,! REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION OISIOICTS OF ORAN6C COUhTT
' CLAIMS PAID 04/i4/93 POSTIN4 DATE 03/24/93
L/
! WARRANT N0. YENOUk AMOUNT DESCRIP710N
�! 128935 PARKSON CORPORATION $644.51 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
_ 128836 PARTS UNLIMITED $1,556.71 TRUCK PARTS
128837 STEVE PELLETIER 6b.50b.U4 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
. 0.1 198636 RUT PENUER4RAFT 4460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128839 PERKIN-ELKLK CORPORATION 45.469.53 LAB SUPPLIES
128840 PIMA 6Rb SYSTEMS INC 6295.885.44 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91
r 126841 PLAINS TRULVALUE HARDWARE $69.80 HARDWARE
y _ _ 128642 POLTPURE INC 628.433.b5 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-I1-92
m - 128843 PORVENE ROLL-A-DOOR 6127.06 ELECTRIC PARTS
m a 126644 POWER ELEC7040 SUPPLY LO 4136.39 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
z 128045 PRECISION INDUSTRIES 4401.22 HARDWARE
128046 - PRESENTATION PNOOUCTS SVGA." OFFICE SUPPLIES
n + 128847 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 684.06 ICE
128648 THE FROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $3.100.66 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
m 128849 STEVE P. RADOS. INC. $103.804.00 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-IA-2
128B50 RED WING SHOES 662b.77 SAFETY SHOES
128851 REOI EXPRESS $92.95 MESSENGER SERVICES
00 128052 THE REb1STER 61.357.26 NOTICES A ADS
126853 REMUTE METER RLSLITING SYSI 55.400.60 POSTAGE
i 220854 COMMUN17Y BUSINESS GRAPHICS 6112.36 PRINTING
128855 MCJUNKIN-REPUWLIC SUPPLY 64.061.2C PLUMBING SUPPLIES
128656 ROBBINS SCIENTIFIC $3,019.05 LAB EQUIPMENT
r I 129857 J R ROBERTS CORP 5135.270.38 CONSTRUCTION J-23-1
f 120850 ROSEMOUNT INC. 9949.84 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
f7 , 128859 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL $1.167.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
128860 ARNOLD S RDNNELSBUR6. C.L. $2.183.7, ENGINEERING SERVICES
128861 PEGGY WILCOX 4540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
. • 12PS62 RUSSELL-S COAST. CO. $300.00 CONSTRUCTION
12R863 JOSEPH T RYERSON 6 SUN IN $629.46 STEEL
128064 SAC WEST 5977.56 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128865 SAFETY YLST $299.32 SAFETY SUPPLIES
126066 SANCTI DIAGNOSTICS PASTEUR $458.70 LAB SUPPLIES
128867 SANTA FF BAG CO $242.4. BUILDING SUPPLIES
12886E SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $765.03 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
228869 SEA COAST OESIb NS 5412.57 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
128870 SHURELUCK SALES $7.026.26 HARDWARE
128671 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION $102.74 LAB SUPPLIES
128872 S16MA CHEMICAL CO 5345.Jb LAB SUPPLIES
126673 SKVPAMK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI $2,923.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL SEAMS
128674 SMITH PIPE 6 SUPPLY INC $37.88 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
129475 SO COAST AIR 8UAL17V $5,597.00 PERMIT F8E8
128876 SO CALIF COASTAL WATER 5.95.558.OG SCCMRP M.0.5-8-91
128877 SOUTHERN CALIF 'EDISON CO 5201.6b0.41 POWER
_ 126B7B $O CAL GAS CO 52.378.23 NATURAL GAS
�.. 128679 SO CALIF WATER CO $36.96 WATER USE
128900 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL Cb $5.170.48 DIESEL/UNLEADED-PIIEL
fA
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WURMINW CAPITAL PROCLSSING DAIS 3/18193 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP44
_ LOUNTV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
T \I�rl CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATL 43/24/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
11 'i 128861 SPARKLETTS DRINKING UATEK s1.871.5G DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
428682 .. VESTALLOY INC $179.78 STEEL
128883 SPEAKER SUPPORT $64.65 PRESENTATION AIDS
' • 128884 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCE SYS 43.G24.14 TRAINING REGISTMTION
12B885 STERLING ART 440.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128686 STEVENS PUBLISHING CORP 6s99.44 SUBSCRIPTION
120887 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO $88.43 TOOLS
n _ 128088 TCH ASSOCIATES il.VGfi.69 LAB SUPPLIES
m 128889 TAYLUR-OUNN MIS - COMPANY 5213.c1 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
f7l 128890 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $69.48 HARDWARE
Z 128891 TRANSHATION INC s323.03 PUMP PARTS
C7 128892 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES s455.0U TRAVEL SERVICES
n
128897 TRAVEL TRAVEL s461.46 TRAVEL SERVICES
226994 _ TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY INC 3164.11 TRUCK PARTS
rn ^i... 128895 JG TUCKER 8 SON INC 1.37.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS
3 128896 TUSTIN DODGE $23.45 TRUCK PARTS
Z�k V 228897 TWINING LABORATORIES 01 31.728.00 LAB SERVICES
12889E UNITED INDUSTRIAL TIME $412.91 TRUCK PARTS
128899 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $209.81 PARCEL SERVICES
128900 _ VWR SCIENTIFIC 55.394.11 LAB SUPPLIES
' 126901 VALIN CORPORATION s1.591.71 FILTER
3> 128942 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO S1.1TB.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
r 128903 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS 141.49 PRINTING
1 1289C4 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS s293.58 LAB SUPPLIES
C7 04 128905 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $13.650.29 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92
N 128906 VESTAUX INTERNATIONAL sbtl.7b TRUCK PARTS
128907 WHESSOE VAREC sli6.94 FREIGHT
�•' 128900 VILLDAN ASSOCIATES 521.352.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-31
_ 128909__ ROURKE 6 WOODRUFF L OR 599.629.6E LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92
128910 AEROX CORP $4,166.65 COPIER LEASES
N _ 128911 GEORGE YARDLEY CU $426.95 VALVES
128912 NORMAN E CULVER 4214.45 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
- 126913 RICHARD B EDGAR 4200.UG DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128914 R08LRT H MAIN s116.0B DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
-----------------
IF TOTAL CLAIMS PAIL L3/14/93 SL.627.461.02
tz
s
W
{: 5 REPO FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINGDATE 03/18/93 PAGE 7
REPORT NNBB AP93
- COD SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 03/29/93 POSTING OATH 03/24/93
N .
r SUMMARY AMOUNT
n '
ppI OPE
R FUND 6.70
qI CAP PAC FUND j58,4 1.00
92 OPER FUND f3,916.94
12 CAP FAC FORD 31,731.68
1 3 OPER FUND 11;197.01
3 CAP PAC FWD $2,183.70
5 OPER FUND 5,726.59
95 CAP FAC FUND $3,024.00
6 OPER FUND f29.51
[1 7 OPBR FUND 4, 79.US
M f 7 CAP FAC FUND 6:368.52
Z - III OPER FUND 2,325.20
914 CAP FAC FUND j 5,943.50
n y8ppSEE OPER s s]
—� - 3T6OPERPFUND j9)7:4611
7.70
rylCORPii{765,184.02
3 ? SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS 219,122.16
— - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 483_815.16
CO $2,627,461.02
r �
c7 1
N ..._ .
N
j
i
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIA
March 23, 1993
' ,OMIi FLL6 YVEMUF
MEMORANDUM
w AIN Vn .f FCANM az70e.6127
TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager .
FROM: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer
SUBJECT. PURCHASE OF ONE STEAM STERILIZER UNIT (AUTOCLAVE)
SPECIFICATION NO. E-226 (REVISED)
Sealed bids were opened on Tuesday. March 16, 1993. for the purchase of One Steam Sterilizer Unit
(Autoclave), Specification No. E-226 (Revised). Tabulation of bids received is as follows:
BIDDER BID PRICE
1. Amsco Scientific $27,145.00
Division of American Sterilizer Co.
Apex, NC
2. MDT Corporation $27,685.00
Anaheim, CA
3. Consolidated Stills& Sterilizer $36,575.00
Boston , MA
4. Fisher Scientific Company NO-BID
Tustin, CA
It is recommended the award be made to Amsco Scientific Division of American Sterilizer Company, the
lowest responsible bidder, for their proposal bid amount of$27,145.00, plus all applicable sales taxes.
Respectfully submitted, 11
K K.Lr uJl1,fY W U.f1�--Ol
Katherine Yarosh
Senior Buyer //�'
W"ra c¢r rg recommendation:
Ted Hoffrhan
Purchasing Manager
A p
G .0 ' 41gon
Blake P.Wers6n
Director of Technical Services
ry G. Stree
hector of Finance
.C. AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS" "C',
Page 1 of 6 ,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �✓
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS.. INC. dba C.O. NO.: Four (41
COUCH AND SONS DATE: April 14. 1993
JOB: INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR, JOB NO. 1-9: AND
REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL. JOB
NO. J-22-2
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (9eduetl $ 83,741.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby
approved.
JOB NO. 1-9:
ITEM 1 - EMERGENCY REPAIRS TO EXISTING 84-INCH INTERPLANT PIPELINE
The Contractor was directed to make emergency repairs to the existing 84-inch
interplant reinforced concrete pipeline south of the Effluent Junction Box (EJB) at
Reclamation Plant No. 1. The location of the EJB is at the intersection of Garfield
Avenue and the west levee of the Santa Ana River. The first joint of the existing
84inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) just south of EJB had recently settled
3 inches and separated from the junction box, which resulted in a small amount of
effluent leaking from the broken joint into the surrounding natural ground below the
pipe. Upon investigation it was determined that structural repairs to the RCP were
required immediately to maintain the integrity of this main effluent pipeline
connecting Reclamation Plant No. 1 with the Ocean Outfall Booster Station (COBS)
at Treatment Plant No. 2. The repair of the pipe involved a two step process. The
first phase involved stabilizing the ground below the 84inch RCP and future
120-inch RCP by grouting and mudjacking the soils. The mudjacking raised the
84-inch RCP approximately 1-inch. The second phase of the repairs involved
excavation and shoring in order to provide access through the south side of the
EJB, structural repairs to the 84-inch RCP and installation and removal of an
extensive dewatering system to control both ground water and diversion of effluent
from the EJB. Structural repairs to the 844nch RCP included removing broken and
cracked concrete from around the pipe joint and sandblasting of the joint to provide
a clean bonding surface.
"D-1" AGENDA ITEM k9(0 - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1"
Page 2 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS., INC. dba C.O. NO.: Four (41
COUCH AND SONS DATE: April 14. 1993
JOB: INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR. JOB NO. 1-9: AND
REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL. JOB
NO. J-22-2
Additional structural steel reinforcement was added and the joint was rebuilt with a
high strength rheoplastic mortar. The majority of this emergency work was
performed during the month of December 1992. During the months of December
and January the Contractor experienced several interruptions to the work. These
were due to inclement weather and changes in plant operating procedures resulting
from preparation to divert flows in case of rain. This item of work was
accomplished on a time-and-material basis pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the
`... General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #7 and #7A)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 74,536.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 2 - REDUCTION IN RETENTION
The amount of retained funds on the project will be reduced from ten percent
(10%) of contract work performed to date to a fixed amount of $1,000,000.00 for
all future progress payments. The Districts' General Provisions require that ten
percent (10%) of each progress payment be retained until final payment, or posting
of approved securities as an alternative to retained funds. To date, the contractor
has posted $1,719,311.68 through Progress Payment No. 20. The work is about
eighty percent (80%) complete. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2"
Page 3 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS.. INC. dba C.O. NO.: Four (4)
COUCH AND SONS DATE: April 14. 1993
JOB: INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR, JOB NO, 1-9: AND
REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB
NO. J-22-2
ITEM 3 - TIME EXTENSION FOR WEATHER DELAYS
The contract provides for 14 days of inclement weather which were satisfied as of
February 7, 1992. As of February 24, 1993, the Contractor was delayed 44
calendar days beyond the contract provisions for inclement weather due to rain and
wet conditions. On June 10, 1992, under Change Order No. 1, Item No. 3 the
Board of Directors approved a time extension of 16 calendar days to the contract
for inclement weather. This item for extension of time delay is authorized pursuant
to Section 6-4 of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 0.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days
JOB NO. J-22-2:
ITEM 4 - SALES TAX ADJUSTMENT
The Contract documents for Job No. 1-9 and Job No. J-22-2 specify that bids be
based on a sales tax rate of 6.5% for purchased materials. Section 51 of the
Contract Specifications allows the Contractor to submit invoices and obtain a sales
tax adjustment for an increase in the sales tax rate above 6.5% during the life of
the Contract. The sales tax adjustment included in this item is based on material
invoices submitted by the Contractor from October 10, 1992 through January 18,
1993 for materials purchased in Orange, Los Angeles and Riverside Counties. The
actual sales tax rate under which the materials were purchased is 7.75% for
Orange and Riverside Counties and 8.25% for Los Angeles County.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,566.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days /
"D-3"
AGENDA ITEM k9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3"
Page 4 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS., INC. dba C.O. NO.: Four 14)
COUCH AND SONS DATE: Aoril 14. 1993
JOB: INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR, JOB NO, 1-9: AND
REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB
NO. J-22-2
ITEM 5 - CAP NATURAL GAS PIPELINE AT PLANT 2
The Contractor was directed to cut and cap an existing 6-inch natural gas pipeline
in the utility tunnel adjacent to the Foster Booster Pump Station at Treatment Plant
No. 2. This existing natural gas pipeline was originally cut and capped when the
Southern California Gas Company installed a new natural gas service and meter
station near the Districts' south property line. New natural gas pipelines were
installed from the meter station to serve the plant and provide increased capacity
for the new cogeneration facility. Upon proceeding with excavation for the new
120-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) ocean outfall, the existing gas pipeline was
found to be in conflict. The Contractor was then directed to remove interfering
portions of the gas pipeline and continue excavation for the new 120-inch RCP.
This required purging the pipe and welding a new permanent steel cap on the
existing 6-inch gas pipeline a second time in a location beyond the alignment of the
new 120-inch ocean outfall pipeline. This item of work was accomplished on a
time-and-material basis pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO #10)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 639.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 83,741.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 14 Calendar Days
"D-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-4"
Page 5 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �r+�
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS.. INC. dba C.O. NO.: Four (4)
COUCH AND SONS DATE: Aoril 14, 1993
JOB: INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR. JOB NO. 1-9: AND
REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB
NO J-22-2
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract
and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued
Change Orders. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that 14 days extension of time to
perform the work is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect,
incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be
incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change
Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date September 11, 1991
Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date May 2, 1993
Time Extension this Change Order 14 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 37 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 637 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date June 8, 1993
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 21,328,600.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 240,925.00
This Change (Add) l9edde;) $ 83,741.00
Amended Contract Price $ 21 ,653,266.00
"D-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(0 - ALL DISTRICTS "D-5"
Page 6 of 6
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS.. INC. dba C.O. NO.: Four (4)
COUCH AND SONS DATE: April 14. 1993
JOB: INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR. JOB NO. 1-9: AND
REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB
NO. J-22-2
Board Authorization Date: April 14, 1993
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY:
iG,rco r 8�3 �- 3-8-9j
ngineed Cdnstructlon Manager Date
APPROVED BY: APPROV
ED AS TO FORM:
a., /,,v Lb `� `jJ�
Director of Engineering Date Gene I Counsel Date
COUCH BROS., INC., dba COUCH AND SONS
ACCEPTED BY:
-8-°13
ontractor Date
(1-9\C0.4)
AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-6"
Page 1 of 8 ,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Twenty (20)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: April 14, 1993
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Bedwet) $ 53,586.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ITEM 1 - NATURAL GAS FILTERS FOR ENGINES
This item is for providing one five-micron gas filtering station for each of the three
gas driven engines in the Central Power Generation Facility. These filters are not
required in the contract documents but are recommended by the engine
manufacturer, Cooper Industries, for engine protection in Cooper Energy Service
Engineering Standard SC-9-2. The Districts' Engine Expert, Advanced Engine
Technologies Corporation, recommended that these natural gas filters should be
installed to insure the engine manufacturer will honor all warranties and
maintenance agreements specified in Job No. J-19A, Electrical Equipment Purchase
Contract for Purchase of Spark-Ignited Engines for use in Central Power Generation
System. Each filter station includes a 5-micron filter, two 3-inch isolation valves,
one local differential pressure indicator, and low point drains with associated
piping. Painting will be accomplished on a future field change order. This item
was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of
the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO - 021)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 14,519.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1"
Page 2 of 8
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Twenty (20)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: April 14, 1993
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 . JOB NO J-19-1
ITEM 2 - REDUCTION OF RETENTION
This item is for reduction of project retention as work is completed. Retention will
be reduced in accordance with the following schedule as the items are completed:
Work Item: Maximum Retention Reduction
A) Complete installation of civil, structural, mechanical,
electrical and controls work $267,000.00
B) Full Load Test - Engine-Generator No. One $ 80,000.00
C) Full Load Test - Engine-Generator No. Two $ 70,000.00
D) Full Load Test - Engine-Generator No. Three $ 52,000.00
E) Seven-Day Operational Test, Punch List $101,000.00
F) Spare Parts, 0&M Manuals $ 93,000.00
G) As-Builts Drawings, Interconnection Diagrams $102,000.00
H) Training, Change Order Work $ 5,543.00
This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with
Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 3 - LOAD BANK SHELTER
This item is for providing a temporary shelter for electrical load banks required for
load testing of engine-generator sets. The load banks must be located outside and
require protection from rain. The shelter is required to avoid weather delays while
load testing. The work includes erection, maintenance for three months, and
removal of the structure. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in
accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO J191-030)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,912.00
`...i TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2"
Page 3 of 8 ,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �..✓
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Twenty (20)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: April 14, 1923
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. J-19-1
ITEM 4 - ADDITIONAL SIGNS
This item is for four additional Type Vill ear protection signs, two additional
Type IX high temperature warning signs, and ten additional Type V No Smoking
signs. Work includes signs, mounting hardware and labor in accordance with
Detailed Specification 60-0800. This item of work was negotiated with the
Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions.
(Reference: RFI J191-272)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 609.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 5 - CHILLER CONTROL WIRING
This item is for conduit and raceway required to complete the absorption chiller
control conduit and wiring. Work included revisions to raceway and cable routed
from the chillers to the motor control centers and additional wiring between
equipment manufacturer control devices. Credit for raceway and cable shown in
the contract documents but not required is included. This item of work was
negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General
Provisions. (Reference: PCH J191-067)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 3,290.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3"
Page 4 of 8
\J COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Twenty (20)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: April 14. 1993
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1
ITEM 6 - CHEMICAL TREATMENT OF ENGINE SUPPORT SYSTEMS
This item is for chemical treatment of water in each engine jacket water system,
heat recovery units, steam condensate system, boiler feedwater system, hot water
system and chilled water system to prevent scaling and corrosion inside the piping
and equipment. Work includes labor and materials to provide treatment of water in
accordance with the approved chemical treatment company recommendations.
This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in accordance with
Section 10-61b)1 of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 6,676.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 7 - STEAM AND HEAT RESERVOIR SYSTEM CONNECTIONS
This item is for providing additional labor and materials to tie the steam and heat
reservoir piping systems into the existing plant piping systems. Work included in
the heat reservoir connection included installation of owner supplied expansion
joints, additional fittings, insulation and flushing of existing plant piping. Work
included in the steam system connection includes installation of pipe fittings at the
south wall of Digesters 5 and 6 control room. This item of work was negotiated
with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH J191-071)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,679.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"E-4" AGENDA ITEM#9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4"
Page 5 of 8
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY �..✓
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Twenty (20)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: Aoril 14, 1993
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO J-19-1
ITEM 8 - LUBE OIL FILTER TEST
This item is for providing support for the lube oil filter test performed by the engine
expert, Advanced Engine Technologies Corporation. Work included providing
electrical connection of test pumps, provision of pump starters, installation of
equipment controls and wiring, fabrication of steel pipe fittings, and support labor
to assemble, run, and disassemble test equipment. This item was accomplished by
Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO - 028) �✓
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 9,842.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 9 - SMOKE DETECTOR WIRING
This item is for providing conduit, wiring and fire alarm system control panel
modifications required to operate the duct mounted smoke detector located in the
HVAC Room on the second floor of the Central Power Generation Facility. The
wiring is required to provide interlocking with Air Handling Unit 3 to shut down the
fan in the event of a fire. This item of work was negotiated with the Contractor in
accordance with Section 10-6(b) 1 of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH J191-065)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 1,988.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER 0 Calendar Days
"E-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-5"
Page 6 of 8
V� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Twenty 120)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: April 14. 1993
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1
ITEM 10 - CONTROL POWER FOR LOADING CONTROL DEVICES
This item is for providing 120 VAC control power for the automatic governor
loading controls located in the medium voltage switchgear. This work is required
to operate the loading controls which are needed for parallel operation of the
generators. This item does not include cost to revise the Medium Voltage
Switchgear Operations and Maintenance Manuals. These costs will be negotiated
later when other revisions to the medium voltage switchgear are complete. This
item was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO - 029)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 449.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 11 - MODIFY 12 KV ELECTRICAL CONDUITS
This item is for removing and correctly rerouting conduits for circuits 5-31 and
5-32 previously installed in accordance with Contract Drawing 1E22. The existing
raceways at Tunnel Intersection H for these circuits are incorrectly shown in the
contract drawings. This item also includes additional conduit for control wiring to
the medium voltage switchgear located in the Electric Service Center. This item
was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of
the General Provisions.
(Reference: FCO - 027)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 7,342.00
..J TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"E-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-6"
Page 7 of 8
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA- 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Twenty (201
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: April 14. 1993
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 . JOB NO. J-19-1
ITEM 12 - RELOCATE 12 KV ELECTRICAL PULL BOX
This item is for work involved in relocating the 12 KV electrical pull box located in
the basement of the Central Power Generation Facility into Intersection I of Tunnel
Number 6. Conflicts with adjacent piping systems inside the basement rendered
use of the electrical pull box impractical. The pull box was moved into the tunnel
intersection where more access is available. Cost includes fifty percent (50%) of
labor and materials required to move the box. This item of work was negotiated
with the Contractor in accordance with Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,280.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 53,586.00 �✓
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract
and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued
Change Orders. It is, therefore, mutually agreed that no time is required for this
Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs,
expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except
as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date February 21, 1991
Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date October 12, 1992
Time Extension this Change Order 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 268 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 868 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date July 7, 1993
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
"E-7" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-7"
Page 8 of 8
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. Twenty (20)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE: April 14, 1993
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1
Original Contract Price $ 15,410,855.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1,201 ,502.00
This Change (Add) (9e4ft*) $ 53,586.00
Amended Contract Price $ 16,665,943.00
Board Authorization Date: April 14, 1993
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY: RECOMMENDED BY:
p- ti 3-8-,
gineering Manager Date 01onstruction Manager Date
APPR ED7BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
?�• �/ 13 3
Director of Engineering ate Gener C6unsel F Date
HUNTER CORPORATION
ACCEPTED BY:
1 3-8-9j
Contractor V Date
"E-8" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-8"
e ~ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
e+ >> ^gp
jam@ OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
p4^4ce cW (714)962-2411 ��✓
March 9, 1993
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with CH2M Hill in
Connection with Expansion of Existing Computer Monitoring and Control Systems at
Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the
Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with CH2M Hill for the preparation of a
project report, design, construction plans and specifications and construction support services in
connection with Expansion of Existing Computer Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2,
Job No. J-31, on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultants, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $690,148.00.
Engineering Services, 1 i
direct labor at hourly rates �•✓
plus overhead at 173%),
not to exceed $319,088.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 36,000.00
Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 292,575.00
Fixed Profit 42,485.00
TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed S690.148.00
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the
services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant.
s/William Mahoney Is/Evelyn Hart
William Mahoney Evelyn Hart
Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
Is/Thomas M. Dawes
Thomas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
Selection Committee 1 /
"F" AGENDA ITEM #9(9)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "F"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-37
APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH CH2M HILL FOR DESIGN AND PROGRAMMING
SERVICES FOR JOB NO. J-31
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
CH2M HILL FOR DESIGN AND PROGRAMMING SERVICES
REQUIRED FOR EXPANSION OF EXISTING COMPUTERIZED
MONITORING AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AT PLANTS 1 AND 2,
JOB NO. J-31
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County
have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the
selection of professional services; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been
negotiated with CH2M Hill for design and programming services
required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and
Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of
Directors on January 13, 1993, the Selection Committee,
established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and
certified the final negotiated fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
"G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1"
Section 1. That the proposed Professional Services
Agreement is for a project which is a portion of the previously-
approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan. The project is to be designed as per the Master
Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15163 of the
Districts' Guidelines, a Final Program Environmental Impact
Report on the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Districts'
Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989; and,
Section 2 . That the certain Professional Services Agreement
dated April 14 , 1993 , by and between County Sanitation District
No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for
Districts Nos. 2 , 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and CH2M Hill for
design and planning services required for Expansion of Existing
Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2,
Job No. J-31, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2 . That payment for said services is hereby
authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said
agreement, as follows:
Professional Services at hourly
rates for labor, plus overhead
at 173%, not to exceed $319, 088. 00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 36, 000. 00
Subconsultant fees, not to exceed 292, 575. 00
Fixed Profit 42 ,485. 00
TOTAL, not to exceed 469D. 148. 00
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(g) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2"
4/ Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District
No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for Districts
Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and
directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the
General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1993.
J GJAJ.OV
�J
"G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(9)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 _
° yv 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92108-7018
(714)962-2411
March 9, 1993
Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo
Engineers for Preparation of Project Report, Design and Construction Support Services in
Connection with Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean
Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the
Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with John Carollo Engineers for the
preparation of the project report in connection whh Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job
No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34, on an hourly-rate basis including
labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants, and fixed profit, in an amount not to
exceed $950,252.00. The design, construction plans and specifications and construction support
services portions will be negotiated separately.
Engineering Services, �a•✓
direct labor at hourly rates
plus overhead at 162%1,
not to exceed $821,602.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 21,750.00
Fixed Profit 106,900.00
TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed $950,252.00
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the
services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant.
s/William Mahoney Is/Evelyn Hart
William Mahoney Evelyn Hart
Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman
Selection Committee Selection Committee
/s/Thomas M. Dawes
Thomas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
Selection Committee t /
"H" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "H"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-38
APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES FOR JOB
NO. J-33 AND JOB NO. J-34
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS TO PREPARE PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
SERVICES FOR STANDBY POWER RELIABILITY MODIFICATIONS,
JOB NO. J-33 , AND OCEAN OUTFALL RELIABILITY UPGRADES,
JOB NO. J-34
WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County
have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the
selection of professional services; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been
negotiated with John Carollo Engineers to prepare plans and
specifications and to provide construction support services for
Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean
Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of
Directors on January 13, 1993, the Selection Committee,
established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and
certified the final negotiated fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2 , 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
"I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS " I-1"
Section 1. That the proposed Professional Services
Agreement is for a project which is a portion of the previously-
approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan. The project is to be designed as per the Master
Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15163 of the
Districts' Guidelines, a Final Program Environmental Impact
Report on the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities
Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Districts'
Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989; and,
Section 2. That the certain Professional Services Agreement
dated April 14, 1993, by and between County Sanitation District
No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for l I
Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and John Carollo
Engineers to prepare plans and specifications and to provide
construction support services for Standby Power Reliability
Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability
Upgrades, Job No. J-34, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby
authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said
agreement, as follows:
Professional Services at hourly
rates for labor, plus overhead
at 162%, not to exceed $921,602.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 21,750.00
Fixed Profit 106,900.00
TOTAL, not to exceed 9950.252.00 1 /
"I-2 AGENDA ITEM #9(h)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2"•✓
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District
No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for Districts
Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and
directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the
General Counsel. _
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1993.
RAGW.038
"I-Y AGENDA ITEM N9(h) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-3"
°'�1�r°�°'• COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
V.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
a4 10944 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 921084018
•4'°ce coin (714)962-2411
March 23, 1993
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 3 of
Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with The Keith
Companies in Connection with Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Mains (First
and Second Units), and New Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 3-36R
In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the
Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with The Keith Companies for the preparation
of a project report, design, construction plans and specifications and construction support services
in connection with Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Mains (First and Second Units), and
New Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 3-36R, on an hourly-rate basis including
labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants, and fixed profit, in an amount not to
exceed $85,683.00.
Engineering Services,
direct labor at hourly rates
plus overhead at 150%),
not to exceed $70,507.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 2,500.00
Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 1,500.00
Fixed Profit 11,176.00
TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed 595.683.00
The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the
services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant.
/s/Sal A. Saoien is/Burnie Dunlap
Sal A. Sapien, Chairman Burnie Dunlap, Chairman Pro Tem
District No. 3 District No. 3
Selection Committee Selection Committee
Is/Thomas M. Dawes
Thomas M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
Selection Committee
"in AGENDA ITEM #90 ) (1) - DISTRICT 3 Hill
• RESOLUTION NO. 93-44-3
APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH THE KEITH COMPANIES FOR DESIGN OF
CONTRACT NO. 3-36R
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE KEITH COMPANIES
FOR DESIGN OF REPLACEMENT OF WESTMINSTER
AVENUE FORCE MAINS (FIRST AND SECOND UNITS) ,
AND NEW WESTSIDE PUMP STATION FORCE MAIN,
CONTRACT NO. 3-36R
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 3 of Orange County, California, have heretofore
adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of
professional services; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been
negotiated with The Keith Companies for design of Replacement of
Westminster Avenue Force Mains (First and Second Units) , and New
Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 3-36R; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of
Directors on September 11, 1991, the Selection Committee,
established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and
certified the final negotiated fee for said services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 3 of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement
dated April 14, 1993, by and between County Sanitation District
No. 3 and The Keith Companies to design Replacement of
"K-1" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "K-1"
Westminster Avenue Force Mains (First and Second Units) , and New
Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract No. 3-36R, is hereby
approved and accepted; and, �•✓
Section 2 . That payment for said services is hereby
authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said
agreement, as follows:
Professional Services at hourly
rates for labor, plus overhead
at 150%, not to exceed $70,507.00
Direct Expenses, not to exceed 2,500. 00
Subconsultants Fees, not to exceed 1,500. 00
Fixed Profit 11, 176. 00
TOTAL, not to exceed 585. 683 . 00
Section 3 . That the Chairman and Secretary of District
No. 3 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said
agreement in form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1993.
R4G/BD.O44
"K-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(j ) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "K-2"
\� RESOLUTION NO. 93-40
DESIGNATING A DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND
AUTHORIZING THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND
THE ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER/TAX COLLECTOR
TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST DISTRICTS' FUNDS
AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 73-18
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
DESIGNATING A DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND AUTHORIZING
THE DISTRICTS' TREASURER AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
TREASURER/TAX COLLECTOR TO INVEST AND/OR REINVEST
DISTRICTS' FUNDS AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 73-18
x xxxxxxxx*xxxxxx*xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
\� DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1: That is hereby appointed as
Treasurer of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California.
Section 2: The authority of the Boards of Directors to
invest or reinvest Districts' surplus funds or to sell or
exchange securities so purchased or to deposit for safekeeping
the funds and investments of the Districts with depositories as
provided for in California Government Code Sections 53608 and
53630, is hereby delegated to the Districts' Treasurer, as
authorized by California Government Code Section 53607.
"L-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(b)(2)(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1"
Section 3: The Districts' Treasurer is authorized to direct
that the Districts' surplus funds or any portion thereof be
deposited into the care, custody and control of the Treasurer/Tax
Collector of the County of Orange for purposes of investment or
reinvestment, pursuant to California Government Code
Section 53684.
Section 4: That the Treasurer/Tax Collector of the County
of Orange (County Treasurer) be, and is hereby, authorized and
directed to invest or to reinvest all funds belonging to the
Districts, which have been transferred to the County Treasurer,
in those instruments as authorized by California Government Code
Section 53601 and/or in deposits with depositories, as authorized
by California Government Code Section 53635. The County
Treasurer is further authorized and directed to sell or exchange
securities so purchased and to terminate or renew deposits so
made. Each of these authorizations is to continue until the
further order of the Boards of Directors of the Districts or the
Districts' Treasurer.
Section 5: That these investments, deposits, sales of
investments, termination or renewal of deposits, are to be made
by the Districts' Treasurer and Treasurer/Tax Collector of the
County of Orange only after consultation with and direction by
the General Manager of the Districts or his designee.
"L-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (2) (b) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2"
`,l section 6: That the Districts' Treasurer and Treasurer/Tax
Collector of the County of Orange, upon confirmation by the
General Manager of the Districts, are hereby authorized and
directed to prepare such records of account as are necessary to
effect the transfer of funds required to make the indicated
investments.
Section 7: In the event of the temporary absence of the
Districts' Treasurer, the Districts' General Manager is hereby
delegated the authority to appoint an Acting Treasurer to carry
out the powers and duties of the office of the Districts'
Treasurer.
Section 8: Resolution No. 73-18 is hereby repealed.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1993.
FAU63.ao
"L-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (2)(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-41
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR SPECIFICATION NO. M-044 1 /
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR OFFICE
TRAILER RELOCATION AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2,
SPECIFICATION NO. M-044
x xxxxxxxxxx++++++xx+xxxx++xx+xxx++
WHEREAS, Districts' engineers, have completed preparation of
the plans and specifications for Office Trailer Relocation at
Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That pursuant to the Districts' Guidelines
Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as
amended, the Districts have concurrently undertaken an
environmental review of the proposed project and hereby determine
that said project is categorically exempt from further CEQA
requirements; and,
Section 2. That the project for Office Trailer Relocation
at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, is hereby
approved, and that the Secretary be directed to file any
documents required by said Guidelines Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended; and,
Section 3. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors
"M-1" AGENDA ITEM #12(b) (1) ALL DISTRICTS "M-1"
by the above-referenced Districts, engineers, for Office Trailer
Relocation at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. M-044, are
hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to
advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of
the Public Contracts Code of the State of California; and,
Section 5. That the General Manager be authorized to
establish the date and time at which said bids will be publicly
opened and read; and,
Section 6. That the Secretary and the Districts' Director
of Engineering or his designee be authorized to open said bids on
behalf of the Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1993.
«cu.an
"M-2" AGENDA ITEM #12(b)(1) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 93-42
AWARDING JOB NO. P2-42-2
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SECONDARY TREATMENT EXPANSION
AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-42-2
x xxxxxx+++++xxxxxx+++++++xxxxxxxxx
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a
project which is a portion of the previously-approved
1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, �J
the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this
project was approved by the Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989;
and,
Section 2 . That the written recommendation this day
submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director
of Engineering that award of contract be made to Margate
Construction, Inc. for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, and the bid tabulation and proposal
submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed;
and,
"N-1" AGENDA ITEM #14(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1"
Section 3. That the contract for Secondary Treatment
Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, be awarded to Margate
Construction, Inc. , in the total amount of $14,496,000.00 in
`.
accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained
therein; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District
No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter
into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work,
pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor,
in form approved by the General Counsel; and,
Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby
rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1993.
\� rc3ei.042
"N-2<' AGENDA ITEM #14(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
March 16, 1993 of ORANGE COUNrt, CAUFORNIA
11:00 a.m.
3 Addenda Isar Euis AVEBUE
Go Box OV
i WWN V1 .fJLIFONHIG BE)E
n+n Bez-zn+
BID TABULATION
Job No. P2-42-2
PROJECT TITLE: Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION: Secondary clarifier extension: new flight and chain: new 55-foot
DAF and miscellaneous nipino
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $22.000.000 BUDGET AMOUNT: $22.35O.00O
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TOTAL
CONTRACTOR BID
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1. Margate Construction, Inc., Carson, CA $14,496,000.00
2. Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper Construction Co.,
(a Joint Venture), Inc., Huntington Beach, CA $14,990,000.00
3. Hunter Corporation, Carlsbad, CA $15,004,781.00
4. Advanco Constructors, Div. of Zurn Constructors, Inc.
Upland, CA $15,296,800.00
5. Steve P. Rados, Inc., Santa Ana, CA $16,187,000.00
6. Kiewit Pacific Co., Santa Fe Springs, CA $16,517,131.00
1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low
bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Margate Construction, Inc.
in the bid amount of $14,496,000.00 as the lowest and best bid.
e /1
M. Dawes
Director of Engineering
�a✓
"N-3" AGENDA ITEM #14(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-3"
• RESOLUTION NO. 93-43
AWARDING JOB NO. P2-43-1
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PRIORITY PROJECTS ELEMENT OF
MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT
NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-43-1
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a
project which is a portion of the previously-approved
1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan.
The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
\J 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines,
the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection,
Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this
project was approved by the Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989;
and,
Section 2. That the written recommendation this day
submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director
of Engineering that award of contract be made to Pascal & Ludwig
Engineers for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous
Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, and
the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are
hereby received and ordered filed; and,
"0-1" AGENDA ITEM #15(d) - ALL DISTRICTS 110-11,
Section 3. That the contract for Priority Projects Element
of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-43-1, be awarded to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the
total amount of $3,398,000.00 in accordance with the terms of
their bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District
No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter
into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work,
pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor,
in form approved by the General Counsel; and,
Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby
rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held April 14, 1993.
.v
rc7aj.Of3
"0-2" AGENDA ITEM #15(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
March 23, 1993 of OMNGE COUNTY. GUFOIINIA
11:00 a.m.
2 Addenda 1 e EWSAVUJUE
n.c.eos e1n
BID TABULATION ^"° vu`a`.MLw °'z'1e'a'°'
n1u19s2x11
Job No. P2-43-1
PROJECT TITLE: Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous
Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION: Construct miscellaneous improvements to
facilities throughout Plant No. 2
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $4.800.O00 BUDGET AMOUNT: $7.000.000
TOTAL
CONTRACTOR BID
1. Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, Ontario, CA $3,398,000
2. Ziebarth & Alper and C. S. Alper Construction
Co., Inc., a Joint Venture, Huntington Beach, CA $3,625,777
3. Christeve Corp., Arcadia, CA $3,635,500
`.a
4. Advanco Constructors, Div. of Zurn Constructors, Inc.
Upland, CA $3,676,197
5. Margate Construction, Inc., Carson, CA $3,690,10O
6. Schuler Engineering, Riverside, CA - $3,803,640
7. S. J. Amoroso Construction Co., Inc., Santa Ana, CA $4,061,000
8. Amelco Industries, Gardena, CA $4,133,600
9. JW Contracting Corporation, Riverside, CA $4,251,500
10. Scott Co. of California, Gardena, CA $4,482,725
1 have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a
responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers in the bid amount of
$53,398,000 as the lowest and best bid.
-�t6U�
Thomas M. awes
Director of Engineering
"0-3" AGENDA ITEM #15(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "0-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS,
W ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
IWAA EO.B AVENUE
April 7, 1993 R.o.go.212,
FMWNN VALLEY.CAUFORNN 9272F
p1.1282,E411 ,. J
STAFF REPORT
Reauest for Consideration of Reduced Connection Fees for Park
Stanton Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton
The District has received the attached communications from Jan Development Co.,
and Director Sal Sapien, Chairman of Sanitation District No. 3, requesting
consideration of a reduction in connection fees for a large Senior Citizen
Apartment Project within the City of Stanton.
The project includes 335 affordable senior citizen apartments located on Katella
Avenue, just west of Beach Boulevard. Chairman Sapien points out that this is a
much needed project to serve the senior population. The units range from 450
square feet to 750 square feet plus common areas. Under the Districts' ordinance,
the connection fee would be $2,350 per unit or $787,250 for the project. The
City of Stanton would receive five percent of this amount, $39,362.50, which is
the standard provision for all cities for administering the District's connection fee
ordinance.
The District has two connection fee rates. The $2,350 residential development fee
applies to dwelling units. Non-residential development is charged a fee of $470 per
thousand square feet (minimum $2,350l. The square footage area fees are used
on industrial and commercial facilities which generally have lower sewage flows per
thousand square feet than residential.
Connection fees are collected to support the construction of the facilities necessary
to serve new development. Those facilities include the large trunk sewers which
collect sewage from the cities and convey it to the treatment plants, the treatment
works, and facilities for the disposal of sewage treatment by-products and disposal
of the treated effluent. The current connection fee of $2,350 per unit, which has
not been raised for two years, is an important component of the Districts' overall
financing program for capital expansion construction. The only other source of
funds for facilities improvements is borrowing in the municipal securities market.
The $2,350 per unit does not meet the Districts' capital needs; consequently, in
recent years, the Districts have issued certificates of participation totaling nearly
$400 million for additional funding of sewerage system improvements and
replacements. The certificates are repaid by annual property taxes and user
charges collected on the property tax bill.
"P-1" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) - DISTRICT 3 "P-110
Staff Report
April 7, 1993
./ Page Two
The issue of totally equitable connection fees is a difficult one with no easy
answers. For example, one home may be occupied by a single occupant, while the
next door house could have five occupants. It could be argued that the connection
fees for the single occupant house, as well as the annual user fee, should be lower;
however, the occupancy could change tomorrow. The same is true of a smaller
apartment versus a larger apartment.
Conversely, an argument can be made that the size of a dwelling is somewhat
independent of the amount of flow received by the sewage system. Sewers must
be designed and constructed for peak flows. Since these peak flows are somewhat
independent of individual sewage discharge, an equal connection fee may be
appropriate. The same is true of most of the components of the treatment and
disposal facilities which again are designed and constructed for peak conditions.
The cost of treating the sewage, however, is very dependent on the amount and
strength of the sewage received. This cost is the operations and maintenance
expenses, which are not funded through the capital connection fee charge. The
operations and maintenance charges are funded largely through the annual user fee
1 ./ and that portion of the one-percent basic property tax levy received by the
Districts. Smaller apartments pay less property tax and multiple family dwelling
units pay a lower annual user fee than a single family dwelling.
Some believe that a senior citizen, a low income senior citizen, or low income units
in general should receive a lower connection fee. It may be that such a fee
reduction is appropriate and, if the Directors concur, it is recommended that staff
be directed to do a study and make recommendations. If a study is undertaken, it
would be appropriate to consider certain guidelines. First, since the cities collect
our connection fees, and retain a portion thereof, should a request for a fee
adjustment be made by the governing board of the agency requesting the
connection fee reduction? Should the agency requesting the reduction be required
to give up an equivalent portion of the five percent collection fee which they now
receive? Should the reduction request be considered on a case-by-case basis or
should the entire connection fee schedule be restructed? If restructured, how
many different categories should be considered?
The Districts' connection fee for any residential project is one of many fees
charged. If a request for a lower rate is going to be considered and/or approved,
should it be conditional on all fees charged on that development by the agency
agreeing to use the same reduction factor?
"P-2" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) - DISTRICT 3 "P-2"
I
Staff Report
April 7, 1993
Page Three
In summary, the issue of totally equitable capital connection fees, annual user fees,
and most other fees is most difficult, at best. To the extent practicable, the
Districts' fees are based on sound guidelines and principles as well as pragmatic
considerations. Reduction in the collection of one fee will shift recovery of the loss
to another fee and source. If cost shifting is appropriate, guidelines should be
incorporated to ensure that fees for all services also share in the burden. Requests
for fee adjustments are received periodically. To date none have been granted by
the Boards.
TMD:jt
wpdnc%eM�c�a.m.n..,t
Attachments (2)
"IP-3" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) - DISTRICT 3 "P-31
I
JOWDEVELOPMENT CO .
8363 WILSHIRE BLVD.. SUITE 634. BEVEBLY HILLS. CA 90211
(2131 653.8677
March 17, 1993
Mr. Wayne Sylvester
General Manager
Orange County Sanitation Department
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Ca. 92728-8127
RE: PARR STANTON SENIORS APARTMENTS
7622 EATELLA AVENUE
STANTON, CA.
Dear Mr. Sylvester:
We are writing to request your consideration in re-classifying our
project's designation to determine the appropriate Orange county
Sanitation Departments Connection Fee. The project cannot afford
the current inappropriate residential classification.
The reason the proposed project requires this re-classification is
because: (1) the project is loot Senior Citizen, which does not
place such a burden on the sewer system, with no families or
children present; (2) the project is a Low-Income project and
cannot economically support a very high connection fee; (3) each
unit is very small in size (approximately 500 square feet) and will
not place the same burden as residential households on the sewer
system; (4) the project is sorely needed in this community and is
not feasible without your consideration.
Please review whether a more appropriate designation might not be
commercial or something other than residential, to more accurately
reflect the nature of this particular project.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Very truly yours,
(� J /J
Edward M. Czukerl
Vice President
EMC/cmw
cc: File
11P-4" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) - DISTRICT 3 "P-4"
March 18, 1993
Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708-7018
Re: Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartment Project
Dear Mr. Sylvester.
The purpose of this letter is seek consideration of a reduction of the connection fee structure for
the above project.
Park Stanton Place which will commence construction within 120 days, is designed as a 335 unit
affordable Senior Citizen Apartment Project, to be located on Vatella Avenue in the City of
Stanton. The project will be of significant benefit to the City of Stanton, and the County of
Orange as a whole since it will provide much-needed housing for our growing Senior population.
100% of the units will be affordable, and 30 units will be reserved for very low income Seniors.
The project will allow Stemma to comply with its obligations pursuant to the Regional Housing
Needs Assessment as well as the housing goals in the General Plan.
It appears to me that there should be some distinction made between normal residential.dwelling
units which are charged a connection fee of$2,350, and a Senior Project such as Park Stanton
Place. 73 of the units are only 450 square feet, 238 units are only 550 square feet, and the
remaining 28 units are a mammum of 750 square feet. The size of the units, as well as the
restriction of the units to occupancy by Senior Citizens only would indicate to me that they are
likely to have much less of an impact to the wastewater treatment facilities of the Districts than
a single family dwelling unit. Accordingly, it would seem appropriate for the Districts to adopt
a fee structure that accounts for these types of dwelling units.
I am requestieg that this matter be plated on the District No. 3 Board of Directors Meeting for
April 14, 1993.
Sincerely,
Sd-L
Sal Sapien
Chairman
District No. 3
Sanitation Districts of Orange County
"P-5" AGENDA ITEM #35(a) - DISTRICT 3 "P-5"
COUNTY SANITATION
`.r DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
MARCH 10, 1993
�i 901TATION
R oQolimo p�Ism
d tt` ca 9
y .
p Sfoca 195
RgNOE coy
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
:q
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Noe. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was hold on March 10, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., in the
Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called
and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as
follows:
ACTIVE _ ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: . Robert ochandl Chairman Thomas E Lutes
x Fred Barters,Chairman pro tem Gene Beyer
' Z James M. Ferryman Nate Reade
L Thomas R.Sitltarelli Leslie Forman
_L Roger Stanton Vacant
D16TRICT NO.r Henry W.Wedaa.Chairman x Jam M.GNllason
John Collins, Chairman pro tem George Scott
f_ Fred Barters Gene Beyer
L Bob Ben the"Dallas
Buck Catlin MOIly McC4nahan
William D.Mahoney James H.Flom
Maria Moreno Norman Z.Eckenrode
Carrey J.Nelson Glenn Parker
Z Iry Pickler Tom Daly
Miguel Pulido Thomas E.Luts
Z Roper Stanton Vacant
George L.Zlaket Sheldon Singer
DLSTN=M.3: Sal A Sateen,Chairman _ Don Martina
• Burnie Contest. Chairman we tom Caney J.Nelson
• Buck Catlin Molly McClanahan
Z John Collin George Scott
Z James V.Evans Margie L Nee
• James H.Flora Well D.Mahoney
�L Don R.Griffin ArMer Brown
_` Gail Kerry Cecilia L.Age
• Frank laselo Gwen A.Forsythe
Thomas E Luh Robert Maturation
g. Eva G.Miner Wally Linn
f_ W Picker Tom Daly
Jim Silva Fade Robitaille
• Sheldon Singer George L.Zeket
• Roger Stanton Vacant
•_ Charles Sylvia Ronld Bates
DISTRICT NO.5: x Jam C.Cox,Jr.,Chairman Jan Debay
Vacant x Roger Stanton
x Fell Sansone Jan Delay
DISTRICT NO. 6: James A.Warner,Chairman Arthur Perry
_X Evelyn Hart,Chairman pro tem Jahn C.Coa,Jr.
Vacant x Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO.7: x Charles E. Puckett.Chairman _ Thomas R. Saltarelli
James A.Warner,Chairman pro tam Mike Schaefer
i Fred Banera Gene Beyer
Jan DebesY Pol Sanone
X Barry Hammond Mike Ward
L Ted More. Miguel PNido
Vacant x Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 11: Graze winches.Chairman Earle Robitaille
• Victor Wants,Chairman pro tem Jim Silva
•_ Roger Stanton Vacant
DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M.Gustation,Chairman Henry W.Wedaa
Fred Sarera,Chairman pro tam Gen Beyer
X Glenn Parker Bumie Dunlap
he N.M., Tom Daly
Vacant x_ Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 14: a Pee A Gwen, Chairman Darryl Miller
g Leslie Pontious,Chairman We tam Charles E. Puckers
x Fred Barters Gene Bevel
Barry Hamm.nd Mike Ward
Vacant s Roger Stanton
—2—
03/10/93
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes,
Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board
Secretary, Corinne Clawson, Chloe Dao,
Patti Gorczyca, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges,
John Linder, Bob Ooten, Carol Palmer,
Lou Sangermano, Mary Simpson,
George Thuro, Chuck Winsor ,
OTHERS PRESENT: John Shaw, Assistant General Counsel,
Jamil Demir, Harvey Hunt, Mary Lee,
Phil Stone
DISTRICT 5 The Joint Chairman announced that the
Election of Chairman pro tem office of Chairman pro tem of District No. 5
had been vacated by a change in Board
representation and that election of a new Chairman pro tem would, therefore, be
in order.
Director Phil Sansone was then duly nominated and elected Chairman pro tem of
District No. 5.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that Director
Adoption of resolution of appreciation Don Roth had announced his retirement from
for retiring Director Don Roth the Boards of Directors, whereupon it was
moved, seconded and carried by unanimous
acclamation:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-36, expressing their
appreciation to retiring Director Don Roth and recognizing his outstanding
contributions and dedication to public service. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Joint Chairman Mahoney stated that the resolution and a plaque would be
presented to Director Roth at a later date.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized Director Fred
Report of the Joint Chairman Barrera who reported on the visit of a
Russian delegation that was briefed on the
Districts' wastewater management program and toured the Districts' facilities last
week. Director Barrera stated that the Russians were officials and others from
the City of Novo Kosino, Russia, which is the City of Orange's sister city. Novo ,
Kosino is on the outskirts of Moscow. He further stated that they were
impressed with our facilities and operations and thanked Joint Chairman Mahoney
and staff for arranging to accommodate the Russian delegation. The Joint
Chairman then expressed appreciation to two Districts' staff members who
interpreted for the group.
-3-
03/10/93
The Joint Chairman then announced the tentatively scheduled upcoming
meetings as follows:
`✓ Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, March 17th, at 5:30 p.m.
Building Committee - Thursday, March 18th, at 5:30 p.m.
Executive Committee - Wednesday, March 24th, at 5:30 p.m.
(Directors Barry Hammond and Gail Kerry were also invited to attend.)
Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee - Thursday, March 25th, at
5:30 p.m.
Special Joint Works Selection Committee re Computers - Tuesday, March 30th,
at 5:30 p.m.
Chairman Mahoney then recognized Director Buck Catlin, the Districts'
representative on the National Water Research Institute (NWRI). Director Catlin
requested Dr. Carol Palmer and Dr. Lou Sangermano, Laboratory Manager, to
come forward. Director Catlin stated that Drs. Palmer, Sangermano and Tsai of
Districts' staff had just been accepted by the American Society for Microbiology
to publish and present for peer review the first two papers on research work
sponsored by NWRI, which is a tremendous recognition for their work, and for
the NWRI and the Districts. At Director Catlin's request, Dr. Palmer described
some of the Laboratory's cutting edge research work.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager stated that he had
Report of the General Manager been in touch with the new Directors who
were unable to attend the orientation and
treatment plant tour held on January 30th to schedule a second session. Once
arrangements are made the Directors will be advised.
Mr. Sylvester then stated that after the closed session for an update on the
status of the engine work for the central power generating facilities, a tour of the
Plant No. 1's facility would be given for those interested Directors.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
• that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
�J
03/10/93
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes.of the regular meeting held
February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
February 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-5-
03/10/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of Payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District
claims set forth on pages "A" and "B"
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be,
and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
02/10/93 02/24/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 742,727.06 S 881,009.32
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1 ,356,661.04 597,536.86
Joint Working Capital Fund - 255,923.68 188,527.46
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 3,503.48 21,008.03
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 2,844.73 1,178.72
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 13,822.88 376,721 .43
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 32,132.85 22,064.58
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 3,800.57 74,531.36
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 2,122.13 278.43
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 5,355.73 64,920.58
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 2,783.41 1 ,254.46
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 104.27 46.19
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 1,238.27 394,015.41
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 3,198.08 26,469.36
`...� DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,787.35 .00
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 106.21 262.69
- 52.429.111 .74 S2.649.824.88
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding contract for Purchase of
Hydrogen Peroxide with Ninety-Day That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Rental of Processina Equipment. Resolution No. 93-20, receiving and filing
Specification No. P-137, to bid tabulation and recommendation and
Peroxidation Systems. Inc. awarding contract for Purchase of Hydrogen
Peroxide with Ninety-Day Rental of
Processing Equipment, Specification No. P-137, to Peroxidation Systems, Inc. for
a unit price of $2.39 per gallon for the hydrogen peroxide, and $15,000.00 for
equipment rental, for a total estimated amount not to exceed $110,600.00 plus
sales tax. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
\J
-6-
03/10/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding contract for Replacement of
of Air Filter Media and Related That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Services. Specification No. 5-068, Resolution No. 93-21, receiving and filing �✓
to P. L. Hawn Company. Inc. bid tabulation and recommendation and
awarding contract for Replacement of Air
Filter Media and Related Services, Specification No. S-068, to P. L. Hawn
Company, Inc. for a total amount not to exceed $27,385.24 plus sales tax for a
one-year period beginning April 1 , 1993, with option for four one-year
extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving plans and specifications
for Job No. J-19-1 That Change Order No. 19 to the plans and
specifications for Central Power Generation
System at Plant No. 1 , Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $70,510.00 to
the contract with Hunter Corporation for six items of additional work, be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Control Center/Operations
and Maintenance Building. Job
No. J-23-1
Approving Change Order No. 9
to the plans and specifications
for Job No. J-23-1
Director Collins expressed concern over the way time extensions were
spread over several change order items. He stated that since the time
extensions mitigated liquidated damages, they equate directly to dollars.
He wanted to confirm that it was not the Boards' policy to do negotiations
in days. He further requested that this change order be approved showing
that the 230 day time extension was equivalent to $115,000.00 in
liquidated damages.
The Director of Engineering then explained that this project was very late
and the contract did have a liquidated damages clause of $500.00 per day.
The contractor, however, actually made claims against the Districts for
considerable time extensions and made significant claims to recover
extended overhead because the contractor claimed that he was delayed
and this added to his costs. The final negotiation brought before the
Directors, however, gives the contractor zero dollars for the extended
overhead and a penalty of $57,500.00 as a resolution of the late
completion days versus the claims made.
`a✓
-7-
03/10/93
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications for Control
Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, authorizing a
net deduction of $9,661.00 from the contract with J.R. Roberts
Corporation for 14 items of added or deleted work, be, and is hereby,
approved, amended to reflect that the 230 days time extensions obviate
$115,000.00 in liquidated damages.
Accepting Job No. J-23-1
as complete
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors herebyadopt Resolution No. 93-22,
accepting Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job
No. J-23-1 as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion
and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change No. 2 to the plans
and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and
Nos. J-23-2 and P2-44 specifications for Plant No. 1 Control Center
r..� Instrumentation, Job No. J-23-2, and
Replacement of Computerized Monitoring System at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-44,
authorizing an addition of $35,125.00 to the contract with HSQ Technology for
two items of additional work or revised contract provisions, be, and is hereby,
approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving plans and specifications for
Job No. P2-43-1 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Resolution No. 93-23, approving plans and
specifications for Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to
Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, and authorizing the General Manager to
receive bids on March 23, 1993. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
-B-
03/10/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with Holmes & Narver. That the Selection Committee certification l
Inc. for design and construction of the final negotiated fee relative to the �a✓
services for Job Nos. P7-44 and Professional Services Agreement with
P2-53 Holmes & Narver, Inc. for design and '
construction services required for Seismic
Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44, and Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-53, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 93-24, approving said agreement with Holmes & Narver, Inc., on an
hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees
and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $1,997,510.00. Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS In response for a request for clarification
Deferring consideration of Purchase regarding the purchase of radio equipment,
of Two-Way Radio Equipment Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of
(Specification No. E-227) Maintenance, reported that the proposed
purchase is for both new and replacement
equipment for the Districts' larger, overall radio communication system which is
supplied by Motorola and maintained under contract by the County. Equipment is
replaced on about a 15-year cycle and new equipment is added to meet increased
communication requirements because of treatment plant expansions.
In response to another question as to whether the Districts' two-way radio
communication system is connected to the County-wide 800 MHz emergency
system, Mr. Hodges advised the Directors that the Districts are not currently
involved in the 800 MHz system. Preliminary discussions were held with the
County some time ago and at that time it did not appear as if that system would
best accommodate the Districts' radio communication needs. Following further
discussion the Directors then suggested that staff further review the 800 MHz
system with the County and report back.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That consideration of the Purchase of Two-Way Radio Equipment (Specification
No. E-227(, from Motorola Communications and Electronics, Inc. in the amount of
$38,383.00 plus sales tax, be, and is hereby, deferred to a future meeting pending
a staff review and report on the appropriateness of the Districts participating in the
County-wide 800 MHz system.
-9-
03/10/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve staff
Summary Financial Report for the That the staff Summary Financial Report for
`1 six-month period ending the six-month period ending December 31,
December 31 . 1992 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered
filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive. file and approve written
reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy
and Executive Committee Committee's meeting and Executive
Committee's meeting held on February 17,
1993 and February 24, 1993, respectively, be and are hereby, received, ordered
filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving donation of laboratory
benches and fume hoods to the That the Boards of Directors do hereby
Southern California Coastal Water authorize and approve the donation and
Research Project Authority transfer of laboratory benches and fume
(SCCWRPA) hoods that have been determined to be
surplus to the Districts' present or future
needs, to the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority
ISCCWRPAI.
`✓ ALL DISTRICTS The Director of Engineering reported that in
Approving plans and specifications accordance with the 1989 Master Plan, in
for Secondary Treatment Expansion October 1989, the Directors authorized the
at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-2 design and construction of a series of
projects that will upgrade and expand the
existing secondary treatment capacity at both plants. Accordingly, construction
plans and specifications have been prepared for the first of such projects,
Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2.
He further reported that this project will increase the capacity of the existing
advanced secondary treatment facilities at Plant No. 2 from 75 million gallons per
day (MGD) to 90 MGD. This work will include extension of the existing secondary
clarifiers an additional 50 feet, construction of a fourth dissolved air flotation
thickener, automated thickened waste activated sludge feed to the existing
digesters, and an upgraded sidestream pump station. This expansion also includes
a satellite control station that will provide operations staff the ability to control
many aspects of the secondary treatment process from a remote location. Also, a
small platform will be included that will allow tour groups to view the secondary
treatment and look over the Huntington Beach Wetlands to the south. Permits
have been received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District, the
Coastal Commission, Fish and Game Department, as well as others. The
engineer's estimate for this work is $22,000,000.
-10-
03/10/93
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-25, approving plans
and specifications for Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job `..✓
No. P2-42-2, and authorizing the General Manager to receive bids on March 16,
1993. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these '
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors of
General Counsel's Comments Prior to the need for a closed session as authorized
Closed Session by Government Code Section 54956.9 to
review:
11 Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and
general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to the co-generation
internal combustion engines.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Convene in closed session pursuant
to Government Code Section The Boards convened in closed session at
54956.9 8:20 p.m. pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of
the Closed Session held by the Boardls) of Directors have been prepared in
accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained
by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and
Committee Closed Meetings.
ALL DISTRICTS At 8:42 p.m. the Boards reconvened in
Reconvene in regular session regular session.
DISTRICTS 1.2.3.5.6.7&11
Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item
relative to adiusting the shares of
various Districts of the cost of certain
improvements to joint facilities
Report of General Manager
The General Manager reported that in 1989 the Boards adopted a 30-year
wastewater management action plan that included provisions for funding
approximately one-half of the $1 .5 billion projected capital expenditure
needs over that 30-year term by issuance of debt. Since then the Districts
have issued three Certificates of Participation: Series A, B and C, which
total a little over $317,000,000.
_11_
03/10/93
The COP funds are utilized to construct both treatment facilities at the
two treatment plants, as well as individual District trunk sewer projects.
One of the requirements for tax-exempt status on the COP issues is that
`✓ the funds must be expended within a 24-month period, otherwise the
District must pay a penalty into the Federal Treasury on the funds that are
unexpended. In arriving at the COP issue amount, we had to make
estimates in 1991 for the two-year period of construction for the
numerous projects that are included in each of the COP issues. To date
our track record has been excellent. However, in District 5 it does not
appear as if they will be able to meet the 24-month expenditure
commitment for series B. There are a couple of reasons for this. The
Districts have been getting excellent construction bids on our projects so
the overall construction cost has been reduced significantly. The other
reason is staff has had to reschedule projects because of other budgetary
considerations.
Mr. Sylvester stated that total overall expenditures for the Districts will
meet the requirement. However, District 5 will have a shortfall because
the estimate was off by a little over 1 % over the three-year period for the
A, B and C issues. Staff has been working with bond counsel for some
time because we have seen this problem coming and have been trying to
figure out how to avoid District 5 having to pay a penalty. The urgency of
this matter is because we only have about two months left for draw down
of the Series B proceeds.
The General Manager reported that Orrick, Herrington and Sutcliffe, the
bond counsel firm, has been working on this and has just within the last
few days devised a solution. The solution provides for a reallocation of
COP proceeds for both Series B and C. The allocation for Series B
between District 5 and the other Districts would be adjusted by
$4.3 million. The reverse transaction would take place for Series C. The
bottom line is that the transaction would not cost any of the other
Districts anything and would potentially save District 5 about $125,000.00
in penalties. The transaction is merely a reallocation of proceeds between
Districts for Series B and C, which washes out in the end to a net of zero
for each of the Districts.
-12-
03/10/93
Authorizing consideration of
Supplemental Agenda Item
relative to adjusting the shares
of various Districts of the cost
of certain improvements to
joint facilities "
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of a
supplemental agenda item relative to adjusting the shares of various
Districts of the cost of certain improvements to joint facilities, which was
not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request
to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted.
Receive and file Staff Report
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report dated March 10, 1993, be, and is hereby, received
and ordered filed.
Approving Resolutions re
adiustina the shares of various
Districts of the cost of certain
improvements to joint facilities
Moved, seconded and duly carried by each respective District:
That its Board of Directors hereby adopts the following resolutions
approving adjusting the shares of various Districts of the cost of certain
improvements to joint facilities:
DISTBICT RESOLUTION NO.
1 93-29-1
2 93-30-2
3 93-31-3
5 93-32-5
6 93-33-6
7 93-34-7
11 93-35-11
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these
minutes.
-13-
03/10/93
DISTRICTS 1 . 6. 7 & 14
Actions re Baker-Gisler Interceptor
from Reclamation Plant No. 1 to Gisler
`O Avenue. Contract No. 14-1-1A-2. and
Modifications to Santa Ana/Dyer Road
Trunk, Contract No. 1-16
Approving Change Order No. 1
to the plans and specifications
for Contract Nos. 14-1-1A-2
and 1-16
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project,
authorizing a net addition of $88,804.00 to the contract with Steve P.
Rados, Inc. for 11 items of added or deleted work, and granting a time
extension of 44 calendar days for completion of the additional work, be, and
is hereby, approved.
Approving Change Order No. 2
to the plans and specifications
for Contract Nos. 14-1-1A-2
and 1-16
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project,
authorizing an addition of $14,434.00 to the contract with Steve P. Rados,
Inc. for adjustment of engineer's quantities, be, and is hereby, approved.
Accepting Contract
Nos. 14-1-1A-2 and 1-16 as
complete
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-26, accepting
said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion
and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-14-
03/10/93
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue purchase
order to E. L. Yeager Construction That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to
Company. Inc. for removal of a issue a purchase order to E. L. Yeager
portion of the abandoned Construction Company, Inc. for removal of a
Santa Ana/Dyer Road Trunk Sewer portion of the abandoned Santa Ana/Dyer
Road Trunk Sewer for an amount not to
exceed $41,000.00.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the ..✓
meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving plans and specifications
for Contract No. 5-36 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts
Resolution No. 93-27-5, approving plans and
specifications for Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, and authorizing
the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the -
meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993.
-15-
03/10/93
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
�.,.' of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the .Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ordering Annexation No. 1 - San
Joaquin Hills Road Annexation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts
Resolution No. 93-28-14, ordering
annexation of 54.52 acres of territory to the District in the vicinity of San Joaquin
Hills Road and Newport Coast Drive in unincorporated County territory (Annexation
No. 1 - San Joaquin Hills Road Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 14).
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 8:42 p.m., March 10, 1993.
6!/ ✓
Assistant Secr ry of a Boards of Directors
of County Sani ation of
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
-16-
FUND NO 9I99 - 41 GIST WORMING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/0/93 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAN4E COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID L2/16/93 POSTING DATE L2/1G/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
127741 AS TECH COMPANY Sbb.730.9. RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
127742 AMERICAN TLLEFNONL S TELEGRAPH 51.363.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
127743 A S 6 DRILLING INC. 11.669.25 DRILLING 88RVICEB
127744 AARON BROTHERS ANT MARTS s:91.73 OFFICE SUPPLIES
127745 ACROBURR 6217.22
327746 ACTION ELECTRONICS $2.6.96 USER INSTRUMENTFEE OVERPAYMENT
127747 ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP 135.320.U4 GINEERIN PARTS
127748 AIR COLD SUPPLY I6C $19.33 AIR CONDITIONING
NINSERGI CGS
127749 AIR PRODUCTS A LHLMICAL 1N fV..}2.D0 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS
127750 AIR A WASTE MGMT. ASSOC. 486.00 O&M AGREEMENT TRAT ON T SYST M.0.8-9-89
RAINING REGISTRATION
127751 AMERSHAM CONY SJ98.6W T
LAB SUPPLI88
127752 ANAHEIM SHbNES MOBILE HOME f5..24.69
USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127753 ANCIENT MARINER RESTAURANT 137.9,
127754 ABC LABORATORIES $235.00 LAB
SERVICES
OVERPAYMENT
LAB ORM RENT
127756 ARMOR BERV ICES INC f9r144.4e UNIFORM RENTALS
ITTX 127756 ARMOR - VAC ,913.99 STREET TRUCK
SE
X 127755 PENURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. l59.9U.99 VACUUM TRUCK NCE ADMINISTRATOR
= 127759 DENTAL INSURANCE SERVICES
CONSULT. 309.L1. DENTAL INSURANCE ADMINI9TMTOR
227760 BFI PORTABLE SEpV ICES f3U9.1V PORTABLE TOILETS
127761 B.M.I. 1J3...I OFFICE SUPPLIES
_{ 127761 SAW SAFETY E SUPPLY SA1.3 1167.7. SAFETY SUPPLIES
127763 BAKER CAC s167.7r OFFICE SUPPLIES
127763 BANK OF THE SETT si1u37.29 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION J-23-2
127765 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 5:.317.29 BATTERIES
12771b BAUER [ODWARDS4P >.26.95 SAFETY ESUPPLIES
OVERPAYMENT
127766 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS
18.972.65 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127768 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC aB.912.G5 LAB SUPPLI88
121769 BELL SN SECURITY
s.11.53 LAB SUPPLIES
127769 BELL ILAD $14$571.02 TEMPORARY 88CURITY 86RVIC63
127771 B7 tlBIRDAV INC a571.O2 USER
MATERIALS
127771 BLOC BIRD MOTEL $193.33 USBR F86 OVERPAYMENT
127773 BOEHRIN6ER
CASE MAN NHL IM ,196.48 LAB SUPPLIES
127774 NOISE CASCADE ETC PRODUCTS a196.A8 OFFICE SUPPLI88
127775 BON-A-RUES sJn 6.21 TRUCK PARTS
127776 BDRNBRANN PUMPS, INC a.3$141.25 PUMP PARTS
127777 Y J BRANSFORD f1RT.25 LAB
FEE OVERPAYMENT
12TTIS BRENNERSON CORP S ASSOC IN si..tl95... CON SUPPLIES
127779 BRIHDER-S CO s-1.6:A.W. CONSTRUCTION J-19-2
12778C BURLINGTO EENGINEE $tl7A7 HARDWARE
127781 BUSINEGTON ENGINEERING 4.al.63 USER F86 OVERPAYMENT
127762 BUSINESS FUDLISHIRS1PS INC S2S7.0. PUBLICATION
127763 GAMY G STRE ED aa..54.65 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
127784 CS COMPANY a..S195.95 TRAINS
127785 1993 CWPCA CONFERENCE alY S.GL TRAINING REGISTRATION
127785 CAL- SM SSCHE IC a.00.5a THAWING REGISTRATION
127786 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CU INC >.LG.Stl CHEMICALS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WURNIN6 CAPITAL PNOCLSSIN6 DATE 2/43/93 PAGE a
NEPURT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION OISTRILTS Of ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PA10 .2/10/93 PUS7IN4 DATE s1/1G/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR APOUAT DESCRIPTION
127787 CALTROL INC a5.5VO.r. FITTINGS
127768 CALIFORNIA PROPERTY MORT 31.N98.86 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127789 JOHN CAROLED LN61NEENS Sc3.973.31
6NGIN88RING 36RVIC83 P1-38
127790 CENTURY FAINT $191.6,
PAINT SUPPLIES
127791 CENTURY SAFETY INST a SVFP S.rbe7L3] 9
127792 CHROMALON SALES $1,060.54 SAFETY SUPPLIES
ELECTRIC PARTS
127793 CHROME CRANKSHAFT INC 4945.u4 MACHINE PARTS
127794 CONNCH AMU SUNS $59b$139.1. CONSTRUCTION I-9
127796 CONNEC70R TCCFARTS CO a139.1J
12779G CONN CLL GM FARTS / OIV ar5 e.il USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
TRUCK PARTS
127790 CONSOLIDATED CHEMICAL
ELECTRICAL DIST a7.912.75 ELECTRIC EUPPLI88
127799 CONTINENTAL ANOXIC AL CO a1.232.5G CHLORINE
127800 CONVERSE LOON STURL >.92.85 S0OL9
127601 CONVERSE INDUSTRIES
CONSULTANTS 0 C $2r561.12 SOIL GENERATOR
PG
127802 COOPER INOUS TFI ES INC S149.77 GENERATOR PARTS
127803 COSTAR 5536.60 LABRENTAL
SUPPLIES
227064 R E COULTER CRANE PENILE a536.U4
X 12T8 GA COUNTY YnULLSaII 4EC1Pll i2r u3r.e9 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
2
ELEC�TRIC
qU SUP PLIES
1270 CALIF INTEGRATED WASTE PUBLICATION
12T906 SYRCy/BPTCP FEES 311r4G0.00 OCEAN MONITORING
127808 DAISY PL U TIME a197.UU PLUMBING PARTS
127809 DENIALS 7COR SERVICE Sr78..r TIRES
a 127810 OE GN2G CORPORATION 6150.6U RENTAL EQUIPMENT
N 127811 HSM/OEACO $391.3T ELECTRIC BVPPLIE9
127812 OIL TACO RON a391.09 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127812 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL a5.$54.05 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-12-92
127614 DIGITAL PO UIPMENTTEC iS9.95 PRINTING
127815 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP liA.S53.3r COMPUTER OVERPAYMENT
- LIMS/CMNS
127815 DITTY DRUM a53.9V USER F88 OVERPAYMENT
12781E DOVEDO ENTERPRISES INC 39.I66.VG PLANT MAINTENANCE 8 REPAIRS
127818 DOVEP ELEVATOR COMPANY S178.L. SERVICE AGREEMENT
127819 OYNN EDV AEDS CO Ef 978.18 PAINT SUPPLIES
127820 EAGLEYNLX $21569.V6 TOOL
PARTS
127821 EAGLE ENTERPRISES a569.62 TOOL
127822 EASTNAN INC S5.691.62 OFFICE SUPPLIES
127622 ENCHANTER S INC alr4bl.G. COMPUTER CONSULTING
127824 ENCHANTER INC a5$534.57 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92
227825 ESSENCES$ INK CO *572.15 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127926 ESSENCE GROEVANP >ST2.1S OFFICE EQUIPMENT
127827 CHAR LEE LVANS I GRAVEL al A$246.6. CONSULTING SERVICES M.O. 11-18-92
127827 FAT SAND DANDISPOSAL
GRAVEL ERV INC a296.6L ROAD BASE
127829 FALCON pEXPOESS SERVICE Sb 156U..L RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.O.10-9-91
127830 FEDERAL EXPRESS LOPP a5U5.J5 AIR FNEIGNT
127831 FISRELLGAS a129.5e PROPANE
127832 FISCNER 6 FURTER CO 36.b5b.69 CHLORINATION PARTS
127832 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO - s55tl.6Y LAB SUPPLI89
FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WUHMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/u5/93 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CUUNTY SANIIATIOH UISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS FAIU .2/14/93 POSTING DATE G2/I1/93
VAPRANT NO. VLROON 6MOUN1 UESCRIPIION
127833 PIECES INSTRUMCNTS 61.6.60 LAB SUPPLIES
127834 FLO-SYSTEMS %187.54 PUMP PARTS
227855 FLUORANICS INC .311.bT CHLORINATION PARTS
127836 FOSS ENVIRONMENTAL 1864.2b JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
127637 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY s3.S17.OG WATER USAGE
127838 FOUNTAIN VALLLV PAINT .136.iO PAINT SUPPLIES
127839 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES S1.07C.56 TOOLS
127840 THL FOXBORO GO *629.29 INSTRUMENT
127841 FREDERICK FUNP L EMGINELAIN 6665.61 CHLORINATION PARTS
127b12 G.C. INDUSTRIES $1.127.70 INSTRUMENT PARTS
127813 68S INCURFORATLO SIGS.53 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127644 GET, INC. 5668.97 COMPUTER PARTS
127005 GANAML LUMBER CO 6764..W LUMBER
127246 GAS RECOVERY SVSLEMS 91.137.79 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127847 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS $2.169.75 FIBERGLASS FABRIGTION
127848 GENERAL BINDING CORP $87.49 EQUIPMENT REPAIR
X 127849 GENERAL TELEPHONE CU 6149.b4 TELEPHONE SERVICES
Z 127650 GEORGE LEECH A ASSOCIATES 6.9.86 INSTRUMENT PARTS
127851 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC 126.965.17 MECHANICAL PARTS
W 127852 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $173.56 INSTRUMENT PARTS
127853 00% GREEN a ASSOCIATES 1166.64 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92
127854 H KOCH As SONS 6547.61 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
n 127855 MSG TECONOL06T 53.7.236..4 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2
127856 MACH COMFANT 1643.1. LAB SUPPLIES
W 127857 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTI 54.622.W7 PIPE
127858 FL "AWN CO INC 5609.67 FILTER
127859 MERMAN MILLEN INC 1782.16 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127860 HEWLETT PACKARD 669J.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT
127861 HILTI INC sia3.46 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
127862 MIAOW METAL FINISMINN 642b.a. USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127863 J.T. HORVATH s ASSOC. 63.136.6E CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1
127864 AS HUSHES CO INC 61.292.L9 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
127865 MUMANA HOSPITAL 69..35.9i USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127866 HUNGRY TIGER 817CS $2.684.71 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127867 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER SIX $14.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES
127868 MUNTIN670N SIGNAL OIL CO $"I..% USER PER OVERPAYMENT
127b69 IRD RECMANALVSIS 13.958.7. INSTRUMENT PARTS
127870 IMPERIAL NEST CHEMICAL 33...23.5. FERROUS CHLORIDE H.O.11-18-92
127071 INDUSTRIAL THREADED FRODUCTS $737.14 CONNECTORS
127072 INGRAM PAPER s292.2. In SUPPLIES
127b73 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. 6.7.14 TRUCK PARTS
127F7e IN-N-OUT BURGER $15.52 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127875 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT S94..6 WATER USAGE
127876 J A M DEMURRING S91.0 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127877 GREAT WESTLRN SANITARY SUPP $990.11 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
127878 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO s5G8.58 INSTRUMENT PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/03/93 PAGE 4
RLPURT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAIU L2/IU/93 PUSIINU GAIL u2/lu/YS
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
127919 JIM-S SUSPENSION SLRVICL 125.bL TRUCK PARTS
121880 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARL C 153..br SAFETY SUPPLIES
127881 MAN PRODUCTS 177.8b HARDWARE
127882 METTENBURG MARINE $991.2. LAB SUPPLIES
227883 KING BEARING INC S..3.9.11 MACHINE SUPPLIES
127884 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES ilU•OI U.2u TOOLS
127605 MARTIN KORDICM Sk 43.06.6E
127086 LAUNDERLANO 3765.65 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
SERVICES I-9
227697 LEE L NO CONSULTING THIN 14.543.9, USER EER NG SERVICES
ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-38-5
127069 NBC
CORP 4G95.33 OCEANJANITORIAL
MONITORING
SUPPLIBS
32]B09 NBC APPLIED ENY IR ONMENIAL i91S.13
12TO90 MPS OCEAN MONITORING
f3O.60 PHOTOGRAPHIC SBRVIC83
127891 NAG SYSTEMS 1617.72 INSTRUMENT PARTS
227893 MART AC ELECTRONICS s11L.24 INSTRUMENT ATI PARTS
127893 MATT - ICHLORNSTRUMENTS
INC i4.205.19 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
>rrl< 127895 MCtl AIR (CIRCUITS IS 1400.00 LAB SUPPLIE9
>C 127696 MC CURDY CIRCUITS INC. 82 $7.316.62 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
2 127696 MC DONALDS >316.E2 USER F88 OVERPAYMENT
127897 MERRILL LYNCH CAPITAL MARKETS 13u.666.67 REMARKETING AGREEMENT
127898 MICROAGE OF CLMRITOS 413.161.67 CONFUTER SOFTWARE
127899 M CRD SE MI CORP. 11.353.19 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127900 MISCO i1.487.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES
D 2279C1 .. MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO a312.00 METER
'127902 MONTGOMERY LABORATORIES 12.W26.UU LAB SERVICES
1279C3 MONTROY SUFFLY CU 1140.71 SAFETY SUPPLIES
127901 "ORION SALT AND/OR 1179.93 SALT
127905 MOTEL 6 LP f379.79 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127906 NOTION INDUSTRIES INC f4YU.15 MECHANICAL PARTS
1279C7 NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY f210.69 JANITORIAL SUPPLIBS
12790E NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS $1.719.28 BUILDING SIGNS
127969 NEWARK ELECTRuNICS .452.14 INSTRUMENT PARTS
127910 NEWPONI CENTER MEDICAL 02 .6.1b8.23 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127911 NORTHGATE CONFUTLR SYSTEMS 1935.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES
127912 NORTHWESTERN CARBON $4.297.17 CHEMICALS
127913 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICLS 4514.O5 SAFETY GLASSES
127914 THE OMMART COMP iBEr.62 INSTRUMENT PARTS
127915 UK SYSTEMS CU 1:9.604.57 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91
127916 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PANTS C f.35.2b TRUCK PARTS
127917 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO $2.862.45 CHEMICALS
127918 ORANGE COURIER f3210L FREIGHT
127919 ORANGE VALVE 0 FITTING CO. 1311.38 FITTINGS
127920 OXYGEN SLPVICE S.040..9 SPECIALTY GASES
127921 COUNTY SANIIATIUN DISIRILI Ya.e53.U4 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT
127922 PC SYSTEMS DESIGN $183.974.94 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
127923 PEST $1,526.75
SEWER TV INSPECTION
127924 PACIFIC PARTS $330.37
INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE 2103/93 PAGE 5
RLPUNT NUMULR AP43
COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID :2/IL/53 LUSTING RAIL .2/14/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AKUUNI ULSCNIPIION
127925 PACIFIC PUULISHLRS Sb7.CL INSTRUMENT PARTS
327926 PACIFIC SAFETY LQDIFRENT CO 14.164.2b SAFETY SUPPLIES
127927 PACIFIC BELL 439.3. TELEPHONE SERVICES
12792A PACIFIC UTILITY FROLUCTS SIL6.L9 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127929 PADRE JANITORIAL DUFF 1..r G9.f. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
127936 PARAGON CADLL 14W.7b CABLE SERVICES
127931 PARSONS TECHNOLOGY a36.25 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
127932 PANTS UNLIFITLU 1964.Ub TRUCK PARTS
127933 PEROSIDATION 13.56b.bu CHEMICALS
127934 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC SIu3.196.Si RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91
127935 POLYPURE INC f26.125.U. CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
127936 POWER TRACK INC Seu.55 PUMP PARTS
127937 HAROLD FRINROSE ICL SN Y.u• ICE
127938 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. $4,818.4. SOIL TESTING
127939 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 14,960.L6 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91
ITT 127940 PULSAFEEDER $160.7. PUMP PARTS
X 127941 PUTZKEISTER INC Se.63i.23 PUMP PARTS
S 127942 OUESTRON CORP 12.409.LL LAB SUPPLIES
127943 RYC CARWASH 13S.3b USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
bO 127944 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO 122b.92 LAB SUPPLIES
127945 RECTC INC 552.467.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-13-91
127946 :EDT EMPRESS f,a 3b MESSENGER SERVICES
n 127947 MCJUNKIN-REFUBLIC SUPPLY S3.u18.5. PLUMBING SUPPLIES
1 127948 ROCK INDUSTRIES 1709.73 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT
V1 127949 JIM ROY EQUIPMENT aL43.51 LAB SUPPLIES
127950 NOYCE INSTRUMENT 31 u7i.iW INSTRUMENT PARTS
127951 RYCOM INSTRUMENTS INC $334.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS
127952 JOSEPH T RYERSON 6 SON IN 12.160.4W METAL
127953 SKC WEST 11.876.6, SAFETY SUPPLIES
12T9E4 SAFETY-KLEE1. CORP 11,111.b3 PARTS CLEANER
127955 SANCON ENGINEERING INC a525.4G SEWER REPAIRS
127956 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC ROTUND S764.43 ELECTRIC MOTOR
127957 SANTA FE WAG CO - S29.G3 FREIGHT
127958 SCIENCE APFLICA71ONS INT4L f.55.332.1: OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92
127959 SCA COAST DESIGNS f735.61 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
127960 SHAMROCK SCILNIIFIC SPLC SYS s9 e.ba LAB SUPPLIES
127961 SHAMROCK SUFFLY faW0.6b LAB SUPPLIES
127962 SMELDANL, INC SYre]Y.iY USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127963 SHILEY INC 6L,75L96 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
327964 SHURELUCK SALLS ib.bO4.71 HARDWARE/PUMP PARTS
127965 SIOUA HONEY ASSOC 14.547.:2 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127966 SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP SY16.22 ELECTRIC PARTS
127961 SOUTH COAST 4ATFR $136.13 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127968 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CU Su.3Ui.76 POWER
227969 SO CAL GAS CO 1.8.674.62 NATURAL GAS
127970 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CU $2,955.66 DIESEL FUEL
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/u3/93 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS FAID Lc/i4/9] POSTING DATE Y,/11/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
127971 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 12r309.20 DRINKING WATER.COOLER RENTALS
127972 STROMBENG PRUOUCTS s9q..E SERVICE AGREEMENT
127973 SUNSET FORD 1]17.L. TRUCK PARTS
127974 SUPER SOLDER SERVICES ♦107.79 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127975 TAGGINr NAOGON MOUILMOME PA. 11,GU3.9b USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
127976 TAYLUR-DUWN MF4 COMPANY A622.54 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
127977 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUFFLY 32r506.Z3 MECHANICAL PARTS
127978 TONY-$ LOCK L SAFE SERVICE sYbb.b9 LOCKS, KEYS G SERVICE
127979 TGYO LANDSCAPING CO 19r53..37 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.O.11-13-91
127980 YRANSMATION INC $1r 375.63
INSTRUMENT PARTS
1279 TRAVEL EYL$ a355. TRAVEL SERVICES
127962 TRAVEL TRAVEL
AYEL 3935... TRAVEL SERVICES
1279638] TUSTI W DODGE
SUPPN INC >7tl1.5C TRUCK PARTS
127985 TUSTIN DLABO 131.5E TRUCK PARTS
127966 TWINING LABORATORIES OF >br 151.68 LAB KSERVICES
PARTS
12798E US POST GLASS TENS S37.lq TRUCK PARTS
ITT>< 327968 US POSTAL SERVICE $.37.1V USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
X 127989 UNOCAL 138..86 UNLEADED GASOLINE
2 127990 UNITED CONCRETE RVICLhllS 3353.4E CONCRETE
S
127991 UNITED PARCEL SLNVICE 3199.99 PARCEL SERVICES
127992 UNITED PHARMACY INC a.1746.21 USED FEE OVERPAYMENT
.--I 227993 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP s196.65 BUILDING
AGREEMENT
127994 UNIVERSAL FLOORING SYSTEMS 161.0E BUILDING SUPPLIES
n 127995 UNIVERSITY SClLN OF CPYAII a$3.544.3. HATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE PROJECT
127996 YWfl SCIENTIFIC i3.G99.]1 LAB SUPPLIES
� 12799E VALCO INSTRUMENTS CO sitl i.ltl LAB SUPPLIES
127998 VARLET CITIES SUPPLY CO $9.91tl.49 PLUMBING SUPPLIEe
127999 VERTEX ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS s2r3U8.95 LAB SUPPLIES
128COO WAREHOUSE
SYSTEMS a1.137.69 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
126401 CARE XOWAR RESTAURANT SJ9808.44 USER F¢8 OVERPAYMENT
128002 EARL WARREN S CO S3.3.99 INSURANCE CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
128003 YATCRMAN MEMBERSHIP
1363.6E CHAIN
128004 CATS REUSE MINSTRUMEN $1r$77.23 AGENCY MEMBERSHIP
228005 WEST COAST INSTRUMENTS MEN TS 317.23 INSTRUMENT PARTS
128005 WEST NEYPORI OIL CO s15.997.b6 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
128006 WESTERN HIGHMEDICAL
FRDU UCTS IN 0001 2 PAINT FEE
OVERPAYMENT
120E07 WESTERN MEDICAL WELTER 3b"Il..5 USER FE6 ODARH.O.e-T
128OC9 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $]6$340.25 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92
126010 WHETHER LAB SALES INC 119O.Z5 LAB SUPPLIES
128611 WILLAMETTE INDUSTRIES INC 16.691.38 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
128G11 ICK ROYAL MU63LL $e.95 b.5. USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
128012 XEROX}ERR} CORFYARD >i4.42Y.2. COPIER LEASES
128014 GEORGE YA YOK06 CO Sb93.65 INSTRUMENT PARTS
128015 YORKSON INTERNATIONAL
CORP 1397.65 INSTRUMENT PARTS
12BG15 PORK INTERNPTIONPL as89.O2 ELECTRIC PARTS
-----------------
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID G/IC/93 12.4Z9.311.74
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 02/03/93 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/10/93 POSTING DATE 02/10/93
SUMMARY AMOUNT
41 OPER FUND $2,844.73
42 OPER FUND $9,127.73
42 CAP FAC FUND $5,695.15
43 OPER FUND $32,132.85
45 OPER FUND $3,304.57
45 CAP FAC FUND $496.00
46 OPER FUND $2,122.13
47 OPER FUND $5,265.25
47 CAP FAC FUND $90.48
411 OPER FUND $2,793.41
413 OPER FUND $104.27
414 OPER FOND $623.35
f7l 414 CAP FAC FUND $624.92
X 4586 OPER FUND $3,198.08
S 46L7 OPER FUND $2,787.35
47814 OPER FUND 4106.21
w JT OPER FUND $742,727.06
CORP $1,356,661.04
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $3,503.48
a JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $255,923.68
I ______________
V $2,429,111.74
FUND NO 9199 - Jl DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/18/93 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID r2/24/93 PUSTING DATE 62/21/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
12SE38 AS TECH COMPANY 156,843.0. RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-93
12SC39 A T b T $4,101.64 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
128040 A T b T 1186.18
126G41 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC s:3L.WG LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
LAB SERVICES
128042 ACTION DOOR REPAIR COOP a3r910.0b
128043 AIR PROOUCTS A CHLMICAL 1N fJ9.8e4. OVERHEAD DOOR REPAIRS
..
12SC44 ALADDIN HOUSE $961.47 GUM AGREEMENTGEN SVST M.0.0-9-89
BUILDING MATERIALS
128095 ALLIED SUPPLY [0 f27 J.9T
VALVE SUPPLIE9
128L16 AMEPICAN 514MA a86U.6k
REPAIR PARTS
12SC48 AMICUNoNAHEIM INC SE siln.OG LAB SUPPLIES
12804E ANGEL S SEWER CONSTRUCTION 16.605.60 I"SEWERS REPAIRS
128050 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC UTIONCTS f�.u2i.b6 LAB SUPPLIES
128052 'AN - DISTRIBUTION a190.69 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
128052 ANTHONYTMONY PENT CONTROL s90.Uu MACHINE REPAIRS
228053 ANIMDNYr$ MCCM b MACMINtr INC. se02.24 MACHINE RB PAIR9
128054 A-PLUS SYSTEMS 12.722.86 NOTICES 6 ADS
fTl 228455 0.8E LABORATORIES 316.J60.0W SERVICE AGREEMENT
X 220056 ARENS INDUSTRIES INC lba T.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS
2 128056 ARMOR - VAC 1500.W4 STREET SHEKPING SERVICES
12805T AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO 419E.D. TRUCK PARTS
128659 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESS3H4 s:u 12ul.b9 PAYROLL NROCESBING SERVICE9
120V60 B b D ENTERPRISES a2U0.b1 INSTRUMENT PARTS
129061 SAW LANDFILL 34.$71.26 RESIDUAL REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
V.1 128062 HIL SAFETY K b SUPPLY 6T1.26 SAFETY SUPPLIE9
N 128063 BINARY CAECA •343.1. DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
120U64 BANANA MAUEPRINI $9r J43.19 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES
128065 B BATE MAN 1693.35 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128065 BATTERY COMPRESSOR
3ES S.15.J5 MCHINEBATTERIES
128666 BAUEE CONPNESSUP a.15.51 MACHINE PARTS
12006 6AATER DIAOgOSllCS INC a3.291.b LAB SUPPLIE9
128068 BIN--a INC a1.213. . SAFETY EQUIPMENT
128069 BON-A-RUES a115.4393 TRUER PARTS
128070 BORNENA EN PUMPS,INEERI INC ,198.28 PUMP PARTS
128071 BROWN ENGINEERING CYNF i39.29b.26 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-19
12807E BROWN 0 JANITORIAL
CONS UL TIg4 $6.650.T3 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-11-1
128L73 BUDGET AND
ASSuCI si.650.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES
12SET9 BUSH 6Np REEUC TAT LS INC 31Jr592.WW SURVEYING SERVICES EMENT 30-92
1260T5 GARY 4 STRE ED f2$494.57 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
128016 CUTE ER PAPER COMPANY 5999.51 OFFICE 3UPPLIES
12801T CEPA 319D.su LAB SUPPLIES
128079 C M 1 1116.Su ELECTRIC PARTS
128080 CAL-GLASS FOR RCSE A0.CX INC. a914.b9 LAB SUPPLIES
128081 CALIFOL A A $1.2.1.09 INSTRUMENT PARTS
128082 CALIFORNIA AUTO NCUL 61NLERS INC .Lb4.09 TRUCK PARTS
12808E SJOHNUSI CARULLD Eq bINCEFS a$5.549.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-39
128083 SUSIE CAVES [` 15.549.51 DEFERRED COMP NITHDRAMAL
FUND NO 9299 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/18/93 PALE 2
REPORT NUMbER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID L4/.9/93 PO4TIN6 DAIL L2/24/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
12BO84 CENTURY SAFETY INST A SUPP 15.727.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128885 DICK CEPEK INC f:b2.Cb TRUCK PARTS
1281186 COAST FIRE EQUIPMENT S1.093.99 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128087 CULE-PARNER INSTRUMENT Cu a193.3u LAB SUPPLIES
128088 COMPUSA. INC. S5.749.87 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/SUPPLIER
128089 COMPUSENVE $10.47 COMPUTER SERVICES
128090 CONDENSER A CHILLER SLRVILL S2.214.84 ELECTRIC SERVICES
128092 CONNELL GM PARTS / OIV $662.36 TRUCK PARTS
128092 CONSOLIDATED LLLCTRICAL DIST 15.987.91 ELECTRIC PARTS
128693 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 34.bo9.4+ PUMP PARTS
128094 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO s"674.44 CHLORINE
128695 CONTRACTOR OS BOOK STORE 1283.UL LAB SUPPLIES
128096 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC a..142.9b INSTRUMENT PARTS
128697 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 95A2.iG TRUCK PARTS
128098 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC i2.238.4b ELECTRIC PARTS
128099 VERNE COX CO. REAL ESTATE AFPR ST.L00.0G APPRAISAL SERVICES
rn 128100 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $13,616.06 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT SERVICES
X 128161 STATE WATER RESOURCES CQMTKUL 1597.56 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEES
Z 128102 STATE WRCB/AFRS FEES 19V0.00 OCEAN DISCHARGE FEES
128103 DAILY PILOT SB0.40 NOTICES 6 ADS
CIV 128104 J.W. 0•ANGLLO CO INC SI.460.26 PIPE
::; 128105 DANI ELS TIRE SERVICE 11.073.G1 TIRES
128306 DANNY DEXTER $59.57 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
bO 120107 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO 39.19J.60 VALVES
I 12810E DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 45.815.07 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-12-92
N 128109 GIFILIFPO ASSOCIATLS 5386.b2 PRINTING
128110 BOLLINGER CORP 1990.31 FILTER
120111 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC 12,040.UO PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
128112 ROBERT F DRIVER ASSOC 15,40U.LO INS. CONSULTING SERVICES
128113 EASTMAN INC S4.534.0 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128114 ECOANALYSIS INC 12.767.22 - OCEAN MONITORING H.O.7-17-91
128115 ELECTRO-TEST INC .11.44... ELECTRICAL SERVICES
128116 ELECTED DYNAMIC SERVICES 12.b29.DU ELECTRICAL SERVICES
128117 ENCHANTER INC $3.920.0C OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-I0-92
128128 ENVIREK 51.957.lb TECHNICAL SERVICES
228119 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC A7i2.0e LAB SERVICES
126120 CHARLES EVANS S "SOC. 5112.7be.Lu ENGINE CONSULTING SERV. M.O.2-10-93
126221 FNC CORP $308.O. LAB SUPPLIES
128122 FIT SAND AND GRAVEL INC 3804.14 ROAD BASE
128123 MARSHALL fAIRRES 5126.Cb DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128124 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICL S..6u0.Lu RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
128125 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORD SA23.5L AIR FREIGHT
128226 FERRELL&AS lob.1, PROPANE
128227 FISCHER 1 PORTER CO Sl.-63.17 CHLORINATION PARTS
126128 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 1227.57 LAB SUPPLIES
228129 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. 5160.44 CONCRETE CUTTING
FUND NO 9199 - JT DISI WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2118193 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP13
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID L:1.4/93 POSTING GAIE CZ/24/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OLSCRIPTION
128130 CLIFFORD A FORKERI 49.186.4J SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92
128131 FOSS ENVIRONMENTAL 11..b I.A9 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
12B132 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 8836.4G FILM
128133 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT S716.65 PAINT SUPPLIES
226134 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES 41.5119.41 TOOLS
128135 THE FOXBORO CV itl2).bL ELECTRIC PARTS
226136 FREDSON RV SUPPLY >05.41 TRUCK PARTS
128137 BUD FRLY 521.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128138 GSI. INC. 5:.636.'. PRINTING SUPPLIES
228139 GANAHL LUMBER CO 12.2]].61 BUILDING MATERIALS
128240 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS Sir.50.LL BUILDING MATERIALS
128141 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $1.089.87 TELEPHONE SERVICES
128142 GIERLICM-MITCHELL INC 421.1J2.63 MACHINE SUPPLIES
120143 WW GRAINGER INC 159.16 ELECTRIC PARTS
126144 GRAPHIC CONTROLS 149.9b INSTRUMENT PARTS
T'EI 126145 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS SZ55.51 FILM
X 126246 DON GREEM 1 ASSOCIATES 145y.Uu SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92
2 126147 CHARLES 6 HARDY INC 1.OY.J1 BUILDING MATERIALS
128248 FRED A HARPER 11.5JG.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
12BI49 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLA5T1 1171.211 PIPE
128150 MATCH 6 MIRX INC 56.46 MGCHANICAL PARTS
12B 151 NAULAWAY CONTAINLNS 1810.O0 CONTAINER RENTALS
w 120152 Pt. HAWN CO INC Sb05.6. FILTER
1 1281`--3 EG HELLER-S SON INC 599.11 TOOLS
W 128154 HELLO S19l..5 COMMUNICATIONS
228155 HEWLETT PACKARD 1690.Ou SERVICE AGREEMENT
128156 HOME CONTROLS DIV/HOKE, INC. 1227.32 VALVES
128157 RS HUGHES CO INC $815.49 PAINT SUPPLIES
120158 HUNTER CORPORATION $349.972.50 CONSTRUCTION 0-19-1
128159 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $22.41 WATER USE
12016D HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER SIX 5165.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128161 HUNTINGTON SUFFLY 1i8.3b HARDWARE
126162 IDEA MAN. INC $372.36 PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS
128163 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL S7y..45.48 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92
128164 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 1542.7O CONNECTORS
120165 INSET SYSTEMS 167.6d COMPUTER SOFTWARE
126266 INTEGRATED BUSINESS TNT. INC 14J414b OFFICE SUPPLIES
128167 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 11.639.56 BATTERIES
128160 IRVINE RANCH WATER UISTRILT 583.72 WATER USE
126169 JLA CREDIT CORP 1L.5.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE
126170 JACK A CHANGE 11.426.7. FITTINGS
12U171 WILLIAM H JACKSON 1731.28 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
128172 JANDEL SCIENTIFIC i]y2.G3 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
120273 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP. 13U9.37 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
12B174 JAYS CATERING S)43.3] DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES
128175 JENSEN TOOLS INC S]2.)3 INSTRUMENT PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROLL"IM4 DATE 2/18/93 PAGE R
6LFORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COON TT
CLAIMS PAID Ii/L9/93 PO4TING DAIL L2/24/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
128176 JEFFRIE MC KIM JOHNSON 5398.4L BUILDING REPAIRS
126177 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 5231.27 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
128178 JONES CHEMICALS INC 16U9.7L CHEMICALS
128179 JONES INDUSTRIAL HAROWARL C .547.97 ELECTRIC PARTS
128180 JOUAN. INC S1U8.67 LAB SUPPLIES
128182 KAMAN BEARINGS L SUPPLY .73.7C MECHANICAL PARTS
128102 KEENAN t ASSOCIATES s2.475.06 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128183 ALDEN KELLET CONSULTING .375.06 SITE INSPECTION - DIST 10
128164 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS SWb W.95 PUMP PARTS
128185 KIMANN LE S.16.51 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
12818E KING BLARING INC S29J9b.57 MACHINE SUPPLIES
128187 RODA INDUSTRIAL SUFPLILS .3-8-36 TOOLS
126188 MARTIN KORUICM SR ".8...7, CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-9
128189 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO SIGO.16 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
128190 LAYNAH. JONES L DYE, LAWYERS 53.492.1E LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER INDUSTRIES
126191 LEGI-TECH s320.0. COMPUTER SERVICES
ITT X 120192 LEE L RO CONSULTING CASA 115,772.55 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38-5
S 120193 LINCOLN NATIONAL LIPL INS. CU. 52.961.95 DEFERRED COMP TRANSFERS
126194 KP LINDSTROM INC S4.148.6L CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL
C73 128195 LUSTRE-CAL S611.14 DECALS
128196 MPS 5116.73 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
128197 MACOMCO $524.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT
12819E NAG SYSTEMS a801.66 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
I� 128199 NAM LEY•S BOILER RLPAIR C4. INC 5Y1.901.14 BOILER RBPAIRB
.� 128200 MARTIN 5538.33 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES
126201 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 581.5E INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
126202 MATT - CNLOR INC 5636.1E CHLORINATION PARTS
12820 HEMBREA $357.7i LAB SUPPLIES
129204 MENSCO INC 43.725.15 BUILDING MATERIALS
1282C5 MESA VERDE COUNTRY CLUB s38i.7C5.46 EASEMENT 14-1-IA
12820E MIDWAY MFG t MACHINING 15.983.55 PUMP PARTS
128207 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL INC 5182.10 BOOKS
12b20B MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION $327.243.60 CONSTRUCTION 2-30
126209 MONTROY SUPPLY CO SI40.71 SAFETY SUPPLIED
128210 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC 3348.31 BASIN PARTS
126211 NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK 59.5OC.64 COP REFUNDING CONSULTIMG DENO.
126212 NEWARK ELECTRONICS 5IC7.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS
128213 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $5.99 WATER USE
126224 OCB RLPROGRAPMICS INC S189.1G PRINTING
126215 DR SYSTEMS CO $14.761.56 CHLORINE M.0.30-9-91
128216 ORACLE CORPORATION 5561.2E COMPUTER SOFTWARE
121,e17 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO $1,833.83 CHEMICALS
126218 ORANGE COUNTY DIRECT MAIL 5168.i5 MAILING SERVICES
128219 ORANGE VALVE L PITTING CO. $451.24 FITTINGS
125220 OSCAR-S LOCK L SAFE 166.47 LOCKS
128221 OXYGEN SERVICE 51.185.71 SPECIALTY GASES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST NURKING CAPITAL FROCESSING DATE 2/lb/93 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID .2/2d93 PUS71MG DATE L2/24/91
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMUUNT DESCRIPTION
128222 COUNTY OF ORANGE $5.262.43 SERVICE AGREEMENT - MOBILE RADIOS
126223 COUNTY OF ORANGE S-782.G0 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES
128224 COUNTY SANITATIuN DISTRICT $1,967.7, DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128225 COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICT $3.BUS.57 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT
12B22b PC SYSTEMS DESIGN $231.65 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
128227 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY .359.25 TOOLS
128229 PACIFIC PARTS 4138.43 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
128229 PACIFIC PROCESS EQUIPMENT INC 13b8.:2 PUMP PARTS
128230 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIFMENT CO 12.455.10 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128231 PACIFIC BELL 15i.53 TELEPHONE SERVICES
128232 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 1924.19 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
12P233 PADRE JANITORIAL SUFP 11.3G5.b7 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
128234 PAGENET 116.66 PAGER RENTALS
128235 PALMIERI, TYLER. WIENER. 13.246.53 LEGAL SERVICES 14-1-IA
128236 PARKSON CORPORA71ON $6,731.85 PLUMBING SUPPLIES -
12B23T PARTS UNLIMITED 11.219.59 TRUCK PARTS
X
128230 ROY PENOERGRAF7 146u.0u DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
= 12b239 PERMIN-ELKER CORFORATION $711.85 LAB SUPPLIES
12 B240 PIMA GRU EYE TENS INC $173.680.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 -
t" 128241 POLYMETRICS, INC. 5192.LJ SERVICE AGREEMENT
128242 POLYFURE INC $21.021.71 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
228243 POWER TRAIN INDUSTRIES 5356.47 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
UO 126244 MIKE PURLICH 6 SONS 167.500.00 CONSTRUCTION 5-35-2
1 228245 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY 1959.LT MECHANICAL PARTS
111 128246 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 14.960.uu INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91
128217 PROTOTYPE INC 165.6. TRAINING REGISTRATION
128248 PULSAFEEDER Sb.314.5L PUMP PARTS
120249 QSI/LIFEKIT $3.314.76 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128250 QUESTRON CORP 1103.00 LAB SUPPLIES
128251 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO 1112.75 LAB SUPPLIES
128252 RECYC INC $321.7i RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91
128253 REbAL RECUUN17ION 13.567.44 SERVICE AWARDS
128254 THE REGISTER A768.4u NOTICES 6 ADS
128255 REISH MARINE STUDIES. INC sb GG.UG OCEAN MONITORING
128256 MCJUNKIN-RCPUBLIC SUPPLY $14,214.91 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
128257 RESEARCH PRODUCTS INT. CURF $335.3. LAB SUPPLIES
120258 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL .1.976..7 INSTRUMENT PARTS
128259 PEbGY RUPP $540.06 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
120260 JOSEPH T RYERSON 6 SUN IN 12.585.1L METAL
126261 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 140u.54 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
128262 SANWA BANK 33b.300.4L CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30
128263 SARTORIUS CORP 1630.uO LAB SUPPLIES
128264 SCOTT SPECIALTY uASES INC 3..29 J.:b SAFETY SUPPLIES
120265 SECURITY SPECIALISTS 143D.05 OFFICE REPAIRS
128266 SHASTA ELECTRIC 19.A1.u6 ELECTRIC SERVICES
128267 SHURELUCK SALES 12,45L95 TRUCK PARTS ``r
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/18/93 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 12/.4/93 PUSTINS DATE Li/24/93
-WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
126260 SILVERI 1 LE BOUEF $37,766.70 CONSTRUCTION 2-30
128269 SO COAST AIR QUALITY 155.9b1.67 PERMIT FEES
128270 SO CALIF EDISON CO A2.500.G6 METER
128271 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 1109.473.16 POWER
128272 SO CAL GAS CO $52.5L NATURAL GAS
128273 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CD I.b.141.81 DIESEL FUEL
128274 SOUTHWEST MATERIAL 1947.79 EQUIPMENT RENTALS
128275 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER Si..51.3i DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
128276 STAMEN 2 SFASSOFF FL - 4E.960.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-19-2
12927T SPEAKER SUPPORT 1251..5 PRESENTATION AIDS
128276 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTLMS INC 411.31 VALVE PARTS
128279 STERLING ART 11.039.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128260 STEVEN STOKICH $516.39 DEFERRED COMP PAYOFF
128291 SUNSET FORD S105.59 TRUCK PARTS
128282 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1340.G4 FITTINGS
128293 THORPE INSULATION S4b.74 PIPE SUPPLIES
m 120284 TONY•S LOCK A SAFE SERVICE $02.62 LOCKS 6 KEYS
X 128205 TUVO LANUSCAPIN6 CO 54.172.37 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING H.0.11-13-91
= 126286 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES 55.782.UL TRAVEL SERVICES
1262B7 TRIPLITE 1700.04 INSTRUMENT PARTS
128288 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY INC 1175.34 TRUCK PARTS
128289 JG TUCKER ■ SON INC S..2b T.94 INSTRUMENT PARTS
128290 TUSTIN DOOGE 5641.00 TRUCK PARTS
12b291 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1253.ib PARCEL SERVICES
128292 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP $1.154.00 SERVICE NUMBERS"
128293 MARK D SOBSLT 5.9.393.5E OCEAN MONITORING
120294 VUR SCIENTIFIC A1.384.44 LAB SUPPLIES
128295 VALLEY CITICS SUPPLY CO $1,396.05 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
120296 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL 14.GD2.02 MACHINE REPAIRS
128297 VAN NOSTRAHD REINHOLD 4314.51 BOOKS
128298 VANIER bUSINESS FORMS S7b.6, PRINTING
128299 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $985.87 LAB SUPPLIES
128300 VERNE-S PLUMBING ♦262.13 PLUMBING PARTS
128301 VISUAL PLANNING SYSTEMS 3489.34 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES
128-02 UEMAC DIV OF PURITAN-SENNETT 5140.LU USER PER OVERPAYMENT
128E03 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY Si5.442.67 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92
128304 RUSSELL WILD L..I.b9 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128305 ROURKE S WOODRUFF G OR $05,803.57 LROAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92
128306 AEROX CORP 5129.3b COPIER LEASES
128307 GEORGE YARDLEY CO bb17.20 VALUES
128308 YORK INTERNATIONAL 1598.31 ELECTRIC PARTS
126309 RICHARD a EU6AR 42JO.60 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
-----------------
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID C2/24/93 $2.649.624.eb
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 2/18/93 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 02/24/93 POSTING DATE 02/24/93
SUMMARY AMOUNT
R1 CAP FAC FUND $1,178.72
R2 OPER FOND r $3,886.43
#2 CAP FAC FUND $372,835.00
R3 OPER FUND $22,064.58
85 OPER FUND $5,046.37
05 CAP FAC FOND $69,484.99
#6 OPER FUND $278.43
N7 OPER FUND 44,D65.30
R7 CAP FAC FUND $60,855.48
411 OPER FUND $1,254.46
813 OPEN FUND $46.19
R14 OPER FUND $78.25
R14 CAP FAC FUND $393,937.16
Xq5&6 OPER FUND $53.48
= R5&6 CAP FAC FUND $26,415.88
R7&14 OPER FUND $262.69
~W JT OPER FUND $981,009.32
COST - $597,536.86
--4 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $21,008.03
CO JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FOND $188,527.46
--------------
V $2,649,629 88
' 04/14/93 JOINT BOARD MEETING
ffA - Received and filed minute excerpts.
##a - JOINT CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
The first item is to bring Director Bill Steiner to the front please. Welcome aboard,
Bill. As we always do, we give our new members a pin recognizing their
membership. It's like Rotary, if you don't wear it, we fine you. Congratulations.
For reports, the Fiscal Policy Committee is to meet on Wednesday, April 21 st, at
5:30 p.m.
Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee is to meet on Tuesday, April 27th, at
11:30 a.m. at SCAQMD offices in Diamond Bar.
WEDAA: Lunch will be served.
Executive Committee is to meet on Wednesday, April 28th, at 5:30 p.m. I would
like to invite Barry Hammond and Frank Laszlo. Can you gentlemen be at the
Executive Committee meeting? Frank responded yes and Barry Hammond was to
call staff and let them know whether he can attend or not.
Personnel Committee is schedule to meet on Thursday, April 29th, at 5:30 p.m.
#4b - GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
I have no special report. I would like to ask the new Directors; we are still trying
to put together a second orientation and treatment plant tour for those not able to
attend the first one. You have in your folders tonight a pink sheet with some
optional dates. I would appreciate it if you would fill it out and either leave it in
your folder or leave it with Clerk.
Staff will have some additional reports on various agenda items later in the
evening.
PONTIOUS: She responded that she would like to attend the next orientation and
treatment plant tour. All Directors were invited by the JC to attend the next
orientation.
Once the date is set staff will notify all the Directors.
#4c - GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT
For the Directors in District No. 6, later in the agenda there is going to be a closed
session and at that time we will be asking District No. 6 to take up an action
regarding an enforcement action from the Source Control Division relating to an
industrial permittee to review and act at that time.
#7 - MINUTE EXCERPTS
STEINER - Abstained from approving 3/10/93 minutes for District Nos. 5, 6, 7, 13
�..i and 44.
#8 - WARRANT ROLL CALL
Motion carried.
#9d - CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 , JOB
NO. J-19-1
COLLINS: As you know I have been concerned about change orders for a couple
of years. My concern has been generally in the frequency of the use and amount
of money that they demand. More specifically my concern is that these Districts
may be paying for the inefficiency or inadequacy of design engineers or
contractors. I've also had some concern regarding the proper use or the intended
use of some of change orders.
I talk to Tom Dawes on a monthly basis to review these things. I believe that after
meeting with Tom and discussing alot of these items that in most cases when the
change order is properly identified in fitting the parameters of the recoverable cost
items situated at the ------ Staff has pursued and ---- the proper monies from either
the design engineers or the contractors. However, there is still trouble in some
areas of change orders that I believe demand our attention in more specific ways.
When a design engineer is not proficient in this work, the inadequacy of his effort
is reflected in the contract document and may not be discovered until after the job
is well underway. Cost to provide for the omitted work may not be any higher at
this time than compared when the contract document was budgeted. So we
approve the change order in the ---- days if necessary.
But there really is incremental costs to the Districts. Our staff has to deal with the
item. The contractor has to spend time dealing with the inadequacy of the design
engineer and maybe some of that gets figured back in when we have to
renegotiate more time for that project and renegotiate a higher cost for that
contractor. Unfortunately, these costs are difficult to quantify and have been
sighted. The costs may --------- but they are difficult to -------
Item 9(d) has a case in point. Item 5 specifies we are ask to pay $3,300.00 for
controls not specifically defined in the contract documents.
Item 7, connections not shown in the contract document. Item 9, conduit wiring
not shown in the contract document. Item 10, this work not shown in the
contract document. Item 11, items incorrectly shown on the contract documents.
Item 12, conflict with adjacent piping systems shown in the contract document.
The contractor is not at fault; the contractor is fixing the work and we should not
delay the project. However, I would like to recommend a couple of steps. I would
like the minutes tonight to show that many of these requests in this item appear to
be caused by the design engineer who in this case is Brown and Caldwell. I would
like for staff to include the name of the design engineer in change orders when
that change order request are caused by that design engineer. I would also like to
ask staff to develop a point system to reflect design engineers competency levels.
Then when this point system is put together and examined over a period of time I
.... would like to stop using design engineering firms that demonstrate inefficiency in
inadequate levels of service. The low bidder may not always be the least
expensive.
Mr. Chairman, I would like to move item #9(d) for the specific recommendation
that Brown and Caldwell's name be shown in the minutes as the design engineer
for this project.
JC: We have a motion and a second to approve the item with Brown and
Caldwell's name reflected in the minutes. Deemed approved.
#11 a. b - ITEMS RECOMMENDED BY THE FISCAL POLICY AND EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE'S //--
STANTON: Abstaining from all of item #11 . Ct 1 S
#11b - MUDGE ROSE GUTHRIE ALEXANDER AND FERDON FOR ADDITIONAL
FEES FOR SPECIAL CO-BOND COUNSEL SERVICES
GULLIXSON: Mr. Chairman on 11(b)(1) I would like to move the approval of the
Fiscal Policy Committee recommendation to pay $110,000.00.
JC: There is a motion and a second to approve the Fiscal Policy Committee's
recommendation of $110,000.00. For those who are familiar with this, the
Executive Committee reviewed the matter based on the Fiscal Policy Committee's
recommendation and the Executive Committee recommended $150,000.00.
So it's on the table in discussion, we now have a motion for the $110,000.00
recommended by the FPC. I want to make clear that we are not approving what
the Executive Committee did. We have a motion and a second. Is there any
further discussion?
On the advice of General Counsel we are going to hold this matter to Executive
session rather than discussing here. I think there are some things that need to be
discussed and revealed to the Board and as a result of that we will not act on this
at the current time. We will discuss this in closed session and we will reconvene
after closed session to take action so it is in fact done publicly.
#11 b2 - INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT POLICY AND RESERVE REPURCHASE
AGREEMENTS
GORCZYCA: During the last couple of months, the Fiscal Policy and Executive
Committees have recommended revising the investment management program
which would implement a reverse repurchase agreement. That approval has been
�.i subject to resolution of any certain legal issues ---- to the other Treasurer
functions. This program is expected to earn approximately $1.2 million annually .
The proposal before you involves the appointment of a separate Districts Treasurer
and the continuance of the County's providing other Treasurer functions to that
District.
As a way of background, the County Treasurer performs other banking and
investment services to the Districts and has since our inception. General Counsel
and County Counsel have agreed that the County Treasurer would not be impaired
from continuing to provide both services should the Districts decide to appoint a
separate Treasurer. Those services could be provided under a simple agreement
between the Districts and the County, but the County Treasurer expressed that he
would be obligated to charge us a fees for those services since he would no longer
be providing all of the Treasurer functions to the Districts. Preceding negotiations
of that fee, the County Treasurer has offered another alternative for your
consideration.
The County Treasurer has offered to make the reverse repurchase agreement on
behalf of the Districts for a $200 flat fee per transaction.
The County Treasurer's alternative proposal to the Districts is perhaps the best of
all worlds. It supports the financial goal of the program and that is to achieve a
greater yield on our cash reserves but it actually reduces the costs of the program
to us. If a separate Districts' Treasurer were to perform the services as previously
discussed for the program, the Districts would incur the cost of custodial banking
services. It has always staffs intent to implement the program in cooperation with
the County to tap the established experience of Bob Citron for this program.
Additionally, the Districts would retain all Treasurer functions as currently provided
by the County Treasurer at no charge.
The basic difference is that if the Districts were to appoint a separate Treasurer,
we would "direct" rather than "request" the reverse repurchase investments and
would need to negotiate a fee for the other Treasurer services that would be
amenable to the Districts and the County.
So based on the County's alternative proposal to us, the Joint Boards now have
the following action alternatives:
1 . Approve the original proposal providing for the appointment of a separate
Districts' Treasurer and dealer to manage the reverse repurchase program as
set forth under Agenda Items 11(b)(2)(a-f).
or
2. Approve the County Treasurer's proposed alternative reverse repurchase
program by taking the following actions:
(a) Consideration of motion confirming the County Treasurer as the
Districts' Treasurer and authorizing the County Treasurer upon request
by the Districts' financial staff, to make reverse repurchase
`..� investments in U.S. Treasuries securities of a maximum amount of
$50 million, not to exceed ten-year maturities, and that payment of
those securities be made by reversing the securities against
themselves; and authorizing payment to the County Treasurer of a flat
$200 fee per transaction; and authorizing the General Manger to
confirm in writing with the County Treasurer on behalf of the
Districts, this action of the Boards.
(b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to lease the Bloomberg
financial reporting system to provide financial market monitoring to aid
staff in administering the reverse repurchase and other Districts'
financial programs.
Staff recommends Alternative 2.
PUCKETT: As Chairman of the Fiscal Policy Committee, I think this is -----------
recommendation and I move.
JC: We have a motion and a second. Before we vote on this, I would like to point
out, I was very impressed with reading this. We've had discussions in FPC's and
Executive Committee's in regards to the reverse repurchase arrangements and one
of the things that hit me is if you will look at page 2 from the letter from Bob
Citron. He indicates that the very end of the second paragraph, "The Orange
County Treasurer currently has over $900 million securities reversed against
themselves" exactly like we are doing it. It is obviously something that many of us
have discussed, what is this and is it something that is used. Here Citron is doing
It himself and that is basically how Bob does such a good job. We are not doing
anything unique here and as a matter of fact 1 really do think it is a good deal that
Citron is going to do this for us, uniquely, for $200 a pop. It is really a good deal.
I think it is certainly the way to go. Any further comments or discussion?
CATLIN: I brought up some issues on this a while back because when it first came
out -------------- After considering the two points that we had concerns with; one
being risk and one being a moral issue. ----------- We do have reservations over
this type of thing on Bob Citron's page 2 where he talks about the negative side.
There are risks ------- so what I am going to do is abstain from this because the
City of Fullerton ----------------- I see nothing for what it is doing -------- Our financial
department -------- going into the risk area so I will abstain.
JC: The record will so reflect we have one abstention on this matter. We do have
a motion and a second. Is there any further comments or discussion?
Stanton: Two abstentions.
JC: We have two abstentions, Director Catlin and Director Stanton. Are there any
others? Seeing none, is there any opposition to the motion? Thank you, it will be
deemed approved. That was recommendation number 2.
1188 - REPAIRS AND MODIFICATIONS TO FLARES AT PLANTS NOS. 1 AND 2,
SPECIFICATION NO. R-040
TMD: Item 18 is a request for authority to issue a purchase order to Sur-Lite in the
amount of $129,400. About a month ago we did some testing on two of our six
digester gas flares. We tested one at each plant and we found the flares to be in
non-compliance with our AQMD permits. We notified the South Coast Air District
immediately within the sixty minutes that we are required to do so. They granted
us a variance after a formal request for thirty days to fix those two flares. We did
that and emergency staff authority and we fixed them, tested them and they are
`J now operating within the limits imposed by the District.
I might add that they weren't out of compliance by very much. They were very,
very close but they were out of compliance. The compliance on these flares runs
about six or seven parts per million ------- It's a very low compliance requirement,
however, the other four flares we believe also need repair. After we fixed those
two and placed them back in service, we started an inspection of the other four
and we believe they have to be repaired. The repairs consist of replacing burners
which actually melted down and to change certain controls which will change the
air mix with the digester gas and the amount of digester gas and temperatures that
will burn that.
We are planning on asking AQMD tomorrow morning, we are going before the
hearing board for a second variance to fix the other four, if you so approve this
request. The maximum amount that we would is the $129,000 requested. It may
be that some of the old burners will not have to be replaced as we get into them
and so the amount would be less.
We are also asking for the authority to hire the burner manufacturer to do monthly
inspections of these while they are in operation for up to two years. We do expect
to take them out of service before that as Central Gen is brought on line and we
use all that digester gas and we won't be burning it in these flares. The
`....� recommended action is to authorize the General Manager to issue that purchase
order so that we can proceed with the upgrading and repair of our flares.
JC: Thank you, Tom. Questions of staff?
COLLINS: It mentions in here that we have increased the temperatures of the
running of these and it also says that other controls and changes made by the
Districts have contributed to the problems. Have we identified what those other
control changes are and the result?
Ti We believe we have. We did make the repairs on the other two and we
made certain changes in the controls. We were running the flares hotter than
required by AQMD. AQMD has an exit from the top of the flare requirement of
1400 degrees. We ran them about 1550 degrees to make sure that we wouldn't
get below that 1400. There is alot of variance in these flares. In doing so, we
believe we may have increased the temperature far greater than that and the
burner level. We believe we have made the necessary adjustments so we can run
these flares about 1500. We still want to be over the 1400 and not do further
damage to those burners.
COLLINS: So the other changes referred in here are changes at the burner level ----
----?
Ti All the changes are at the burner level.
PICKLER: Is it possible that instead of every month you could inspect these
quarterly?
TMD: Yes, sir. We believe that as soon as the Central Gen's are on-line we won't
have to use these flares and we won't be inspecting them but quarterly or less
than that. We just want to be able to have the inspections going while they are
still in use. Hopefully by July Central Gen will be in full operation.
JC: Further questions from staff? We have a motion and a second to approve. Is
there any further discussion? Abstentions? Oppositions? Seeing none, it will be
deemed approved.
#35 - Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments
JC: We have a motion and a second to approve, is that correct to approve the
recommendation? I think what I'd like to have you do is have General Counsel
make some comments before we do that. I thought we would have some
discussion before we had the item moved. Let's have a report from General
Counsel.
TLW: This is not the first time a request of this nature has been presented to the
Districts. There have been similar requests not only in District 3 but several of the
other Districts as well. I would point out to you a couple of things that are
certainly very important from a legal perspective. One, being that the request here
is to reduce the sewer connection fees. Sewer connection fees are established by
ordinance that are adopted after a variety of procedural requirements are satisfied -
notice and hearings and then the ordinances are adopted. Our ordinance has no
provision for the waiver or modification of any fees. The ordinances says this is
the fee - period.
In order to effectively accomplish this, if this is the direction of the Board, what
would have to happen is we would have to process an ordinance amendment and
have hearings and process it to set forth an amendment which would then
necessarily include alot of various findings that would have to be made to justify it.
There is a second point that I feel obligated to bring before the Board. I went back
through my files to a 1979 opinion to the Board of Directors of District 2 on this
very issue on a request for a connection fee waiver for a senior citizen housing
project. I set forth in that opinion which I reaffirmed with the District 3 Directors
tonight the point that I just made and secondly that there is an issue. In the
1970's and early of the 1980's, the Districts did receive certain grant monies
under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Clean Air Act and its grant
program which is no longer in existence. But we got many millions of dollars for
the building of facilities both here at Plant 1 and Plant 2. One of the statutory
requirements under federal law was that we had to adopt a very comprehensive
revenue program. One component of that was that there be a established a
uniform, fair and equitable levy of charges and assessments and that all parties
must pay on a fair and equitable basis.
While it may in fact be somewhat theoretical I would caution that a legal argument
can be made that if in fact property owner "x" is allowed to pay a lesser fee than
all other property owners that it runs afoul of the federal regulations and could in
theory, the federal government could come back and audit and say "you have now
no further compliance with your revenue program in that you have a
disproportionate and an unequal levy assessment of fees". I've heard of instances
across the country on this where it has been challenged periodically. I really don't
know whether EPA has ever done anything about enforcing it to the point of
actually taking the money back from the local agency but I would be remiss if I
didn't at least point that out. At least in theory that argument can be made. The
major point is that we would have to consider the ordinance as an amendment. As
it stands now, there is simply no legal authority to grant waiver.
SAPIEN: ------ reclassify the project commercial rather than residential?
TLW: I guess I have two points on that. I think that the Directors would have to
realistically look at the true facts and see if they could justify such a finding. We
had a very identical situation in District 5 about three years where there was a
dispute. It was a congregate care senior citizen facility, not a low cost one.
There was a legal argument. They threatened to sue the District on that very
point; that it was commercial and not residential. We advised the District and we
got into alot of argument without a law suit with the developer. They finally
backed off and agreed that yes they couldn't make the case, that it really was
commercial. District 5 refused to accept that premise and would not waive the
fees.
I think that it is very tenuous to think that we could make adequate findings of fact
�..i that say a housing project really is commercial. I know that the arguments that
can be brought up by the developers because I have seen them in writing. I've
seen them in South County and in Newport Beach in the case I just shown as an
example. They say this is really commercial, we really aren't in it for the good of
people living in those apartments, we're just in it for the money. That sounds kind
of crass but if you are trying to make your point, you may have to take a moment
and be somewhat crass in your argument.
In theory every development is a commercial venture for somebody and that. be the
developer. I would be very troubled trying to make those findings frankly.
PICKLER: My question is on Jan Development? Aren't they the ones that will pick
up the tab?
(End of tape)
r
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 29 3, 5, 6, 79 11, 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
APRIL 14, 1993
0iTATtON
_., 6 tavclimn O.va�ST
N
44F
Si... 195A
O'99'VGE COUNT
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, B.
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on April 14. 1993, at 7:30 p.m., in the
Districts'Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was
called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 5, 7, 11, 13 and 14
as follows: ,
ACTIYE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
I-xvi" DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. l: . Robert Richardson, Chairman _.Thomas E. Lutz
I x Fred Barters,Chairman pro tam Gene Beyer
James M.Ferryman Nate Reeds
Thomas R. Salterelli UsHe Pontious
i Roger Stanton Wiliam G. Stainer
DISTRICT NO.2: Henry W.Worries, Chairman Jahn M.GNlisson
John Collins, Chairman pro tam George Scot,
Fred Somers Gene Beyer
x Bob Beg Barry Denes _
Buck Catlin Molly McClanahan
William 0.Mahoney James H. Flora
Maria Moreno Norman Z.Eckenrode
Carrey J.Nelson Glerm Parker
In,fickler Tom Daly
_ Miguel Potido Thomas E.l uv
i Roger Stanton William G.Steller
a_ George L Baker Sheldon Singer
DISTRICT NO. 3: Sal A Sapim. Chairman Don Monies
_ Bumie Dunap, Chairman pro tam x Carrey J.Nelson
Buck Ceram Molly McClanahan
John Collins George Scott
X James V.Evans Margie L. Rice
y_ James H.Flora William D.Mahoney
Don R.Griffin Arthur We.
x Gail Nang Cecilia L Age
x Frank Lasalo Gwen A. Forsythe
s_ Thomas E. Lut, Robert Richardson
Eva G. Miner Wally Lim
Iry fickler Tom Daly
Jim Silva Ease Robitaille
Sheldon Singer George L. Zlaket
Roger Stanton William G.Steiner
x Charles Sylvia Ronald Bates
DISTRICT NO.S: i John C. Cos. Jr., Chairman Jan Delay
y_ firil same. _ Jan Debay
William G. Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: James A.Wahnm, Chairman Anna Perry
Evelyn Han,Chairman We tam John C. Cps,Jr.
William G. Steiner _ Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: i Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Thomas R. Saltarelli
James A.Warmer, Chairman pro tam Mike Scheeler
Fred Barren Gene Beyer
i Jan Debav Wail Sansone
Barry Hammond Mike Word
Ted Mores Miguel Niel.
x Wllam G. Stainer Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Wncholl, Chairman Earle Robiaille
L Visor Wpm ,Chairman pro tem Jim Siva
X Roger Stanton Wlliam G. Steiner
DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M.Gullixem, Chairman Henry W.Wedaa
Fred genera,Chairman pro tam Gene Beyer
Glenn Parker Bumie Dunlap
x In,fickler Tom Daly
William G. Steiner Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 14: Peer A.Swan,Chairman Darryl Miller
\`i a Leslie Pontious, Chairman pro tam Charles E. Puckett
i Fred Garton Gene Beyer
Bath HammaM Mike Ward
William G.Show _ Roger Stanton
—2—
04/14/93
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manger,
Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes,
Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board
Secretary, Susan Bradford, Chris Cervellone,
Corinne Clawson, Patti Gorczyca,
Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, John Linder,
Margie Nellor, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, °
Mary Simpson, Ed Torres, Chuck Winsor,
Ray Young
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel,
Edward Czuker, Harvey Hunt, Bill Knopf,
Jim Parker, Phil Stone
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file resolution of the
Board of Supervisors re change in That Resolution No. 93-252 from the Board
appointment of active and alternate of Supervisors re change in appointment of
representatives active and alternate representatives, be, and
is hereby, received and ordered filed, as
follows:
Districts Active Director Alternate Director
1,2,3 & 11 Roger R. Stanton William G. Steiner
5,6,7,13 & 14 William G. Steiner Roger R. Stanton �✓
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed recently
Presentation of Districts' pin to new seated Director William Steiner to the Boards
Director and presented him with a pin bearing the
Districts' logo. The pin is similar to the
service pins given to employees and recognize the Directors for their service on the
Boards of the Sanitation Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced the
Report of the Joint Chairman tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as
follows:
Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, April 21st, at 5:30 p.m.
Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee - Tuesday, April 27th, at 11 :30 a.m.,
at the South Coast Air Quality Management District offices in Diamond Bar
Executive Committee - Wednesday, April 28th, at 5:30 p.m.
(Directors Barry Hammond and Frank Laszlo were also invited to attend.)
Personnel Committee - Thursday, April 29th, at 5:30 p.m.
-3-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager stated that he was
Report of the General Manager trying to schedule a second tour for the new
Directors who were unable to attend the
orientation and treatment plant tour held on January 30th. He requested those
Directors to complete and turn in to the Board Secretary a form included in their
` folders indicating alternative dates. Mr. Sylvester stated that once the tour date
was set, all Directors would be notified and are encouraged to attend.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered that
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
...� March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
-4-
04/14/93
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ,
Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments
Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held
March 10, 1993, the Chairman ordered
that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
Director William G. Steiner requested that his abstention from voting on this item
be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint and
Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District
claims set forth on pages "A" and "B"
attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and
are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated.
03/10/93 03/24/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 677,448.08 $977,467.70
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,421,117.67 765,184.02
Joint Working Capital Fund - 179,797.23 483,815.16
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 1,988.14 219,122.16
DISTRICT NO. 1 - .00 58,477.70
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 332,769.99 35,648.62
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 301,248.87 13,380.71
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 83,994.99 8,750.59
DISTRICT NO. 6 - .00 29.51
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 40,098.12 11,147.61
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 1,149.30 5,275.06
DISTRICT NO. 13 - .00 .00
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 929.85 45,943.50
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 23,221 .93 3,218.68
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,303.10 .00
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 7,747.69 .00
$3.073.814.96 $2.627 461.02
-5-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding Purchase of One Steam
Sterilizer Unit (Autoclave). That the bid tabulation and recommendation
Specification No. E-226 (Revised) to re award of Purchase of One Steam Sterilizer
Amsco Scientific. Division of Unit (Autoclave), Specification No. E-226
i
American Sterilizer Company (Revised), be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Amsco
Scientific, Division of American Sterilizer Company, for a total amount not to
exceed $27,145.00 plus sales tax.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to issue a purchase
order to Hewlett-Packard for Purchase That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to
of Gas Chromatograph/Mass issue a purchase order to Hewlett-Packard
Spectrometer System, Specification Company in the amount of $62,000.00,
No. E-228 plus tax and freight, for Purchase of Gas
Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer System,
Specification No. E-228.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 4 to the
plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 4 to the plans and
Nos. 1-9 and J-22-2 specifications for Interplant Pipeline
and Utility Corridor, Job No. 1-9, and
Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-22-2, authorizing an
addition of $83,741 .00 to the contract with Colich Bros., Inc. dba Colich and
Sons, for three items of additional work, granting a time extension of 14 calendar
days for completion of said additional work, and one item pertaining to a contract-
authorized sales tax adjustment, and one other contract adjustment, be, and is
hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Director Collins stated that he believed many
Approving Change Order No 20 of the items in change orders for this project
to the plans and specifications for and others are a result of inefficiencies or
Job No. J-19-1 inadequacies of the design engineer and
cited examples in Change Order No. 20. He
observed that although the change order cost for omitted work may not be any
more than would have been paid if included in the original bid, he was concerned
that there may be other incidental costs. He also noted that the contractor should
not be penalized or the work delayed because of these deficiencies. He asked that
staff include the name of the design engineer in the change orders and develop a
system to rate design engineers' proficiency to be considered in future work.
Director Collins then moved approval of Change Order No. 20 with the specific
recommendation that the design engineer's name be shown in the minutes for this
project.
-6-
04/14/93
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 20 to the plans and specifications for Central Power
Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, designed by Brown and `..✓
Caldwell, authorizing an addition of $53,586.00 to the contract with Hunter
Corporation for 12 items of additional work or other contract adjustments, be, and
is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to negotiate Addendum No. 2 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is
Professional Services Agreement with hereby, authorized to negotiate Addendum
John Carollo Engineers for design and No. 2 to the Professional Services
construction services. preparation Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for
of operations and maintenance design and construction services,
manuals, and trainino services for preparation of operations and maintenance
Job Nos. P1-36 and P2-42 manuals, and training services re Secondary
Treatment Improvements at Plant No. 1, Job
No. P1-36, and Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42, to
change the scope of work and to provide for additional design services to
investigate new technology for modifications to enhance advanced treatment
effectiveness and efficiency and provide operational flexibility and reliability.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to solicit proposals and negotiate a That the Selection Committee be, and is 1 ,
Professional Services Agreement for hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and `••,✓
Job Nos. Pi-46 and P2-55 negotiate a Professional Services Agreement
for engineering evaluation and design and
construction support services required for Chemical and Wastehauler Facility
Modifications at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-46, and Chemical and Plant Water Facility
Modifications at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-55.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with CH2M Hill for design That the Selection Committee certification
and oroarammina services for Job of the final negotiated fee relative to the
No. J-31 Professional Services Agreement with CH2M
Hill for design and programming services
required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at
Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and
approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 93-37, approving said agreement with CH2M Hill for said services, on an
hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultant fees
and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $690,148.00. Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-7-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with John Carollo That the Selection Committee certification
Engineers to prepare glans and of the final negotiated fee relative to the
�.J specifications and to provide Professional Services Agreement with John
construction support services for Job Carollo Engineers to prepare plans and
Nos. J-33 and J-34 specifications and to provide construction
support services for Standby Power
Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job
No. J-34, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution
No. 93-38, approving said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said
services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed
$950,252.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy
and Executive Committee Committee's meeting and Executive
Committee's meeting held on March 17,
1993 and March 24, 1993, respectively, be and are hereby, received, ordered filed
and approved.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be
made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS
Discussion re Investment
Management Policy and Proposed
Reserve Repurchase Investment
Program
Verbal report of staff
The Districts' Financial Manager, Patti Gorczyca, reported that the Fiscal
Policy and Executive Committees are recommending revisions to the
Districts' investment management policy to implement provisions for reverse
repurchase transactions, subject to satisfactory resolution of any questions
by the Orange County Treasurer-Tax Collector (County Treasurer) pertaining
to banking services provided by his office on behalf of the Districts. Based
on recent performance of the securities market, the Districts could expect to
earn approximately $1 .2 million annually from this program. The proposal
provides that the Districts would appoint a separate Treasurer and dealer to
manage the program, and the County Treasurer would continue to provide
other Treasury and investment services as in the past.
-8-
04/14/93
The office of County Counsel has reviewed the March 23, 1993, letter from
the General Counsel (included in the Directors' original April 14 agenda
package), which concluded that the Districts are empowered to appoint their
own Treasurer, who could be a person other than the County Treasurer, and
that there are no prohibitions or restrictions imposed on either the County
Treasurer or the Districts relating to the ability of the Districts to transfer
their funds to the County Treasury for purposes of deposit and investment,
or for the County to provide other Treasury services. County Counsel has
concurred with General Counsel's opinion. ,
Ms. Gorczyca further reported that the County Treasurer performs other
banking and investment services for the Districts and has since our
inception. General Counsel and County Counsel agreed that the County
Treasurer would not be impaired from continuing to provide both services
should the Districts decide to appoint a separate Treasurer. Those services
could be provided under a simple agreement between the Districts and the
County, but the County Treasurer expressed that he would be obligated to
charge a fee for these services as he would no longer be performing all of
the Treasurer functions. The County Treasurer has not yet determined an
appropriate charge, but has offered the Districts another alternative for
consideration.
Ms. Gorczyca reported that since the Executive Committee meeting, the
County Treasurer has offered to make the reverse repurchase investments
on behalf of the Districts for a $200 flat fee per transaction and referred
Directors to a letter dated April 12, 1993, from Robert L. Citron, included in
their meeting folders. The County Treasurer's alternative proposal provides
the Districts with perhaps the best of both worlds. It supports the financial
goal of the Districts' reverse repurchase program, since it does allow us to
achieve the same improved yield on cash reserves as anticipated, and
actually reduces the costs of the program. If a separate Districts' Treasurer
were to engage in reverse repurchases, the Districts would incur costs of
custodial bank services considerably in excess of the $200 flat fee. Also, it
has always been the Districts' intent to carry out the reverse repurchase
program in partnership with the County Treasurer in order to tap the
established expertise of Bob Citron. Additionally, the Districts would retain
the benefit of all the Treasury services as currently provided by the County
Treasurer at no charge. The basic difference is that if the Districts were to
appoint a separate Treasurer, we would "direct" rather than "request" the
reverse repurchase investments and would need to negotiate a fee for other
banking services amenable to both the County Treasurer and Districts.
The Financial Manager advised the Board Members that based on the County
Treasurer's alternative proposal, if the Directors wished to proceed with the
reverse repurchase program, the Joint Boards now had the option of either
approving the original proposal providing for the appointment of a separate
Districts' Treasurer and dealer to manage the reverse repurchase program, or
approving the County Treasurer's proposed alternative reverse repurchase
program.
-9-
04/14/93
Following a brief discussion, the following action was taken.
Authorizing the County
Treasurer to make reverse
�..' repurchase investments on
behalf of the Districts
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the County Treasurer be, and is hereby, confirmed as the Districts'
Treasurer; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the County Treasurer be, and is hereby, authorized,
upon request by the Districts' financial staff, to make reverse repurchase
investments in U.S. Treasuries securities of a maximum amount of
$50 million, not to exceed ten-year maturities, and that payment of those
securities be made by reversing the securities against themselves; and
authorizing payment to the County Treasurer of a $200 flat fee per
transaction; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized
to confirm in writing with the County Treasurer, on behalf of the Districts,
this action of the Boards.
Directors A. B. Catlin and Roger R. Stanton requested that their abstention
from voting on this item be made a matter of record.
Authorizing lease of
Bloomberg financial reporting
system
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to lease the Bloomberg financial
reporting system to provide financial market monitoring to aid staff in
administering the reverse repurchase and other Districts' financial programs.
Directors A. B. Catlin and Roger Stanton requested that their abstention
from voting on this item be made a matter of record.
-10-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Fixed Floating Interest Rate
Swap (1993 SWAP)
Authorizing staff to proceed �a.✓
with preliminary 1993 SWAP
structuring. utilizing
underwriters Merrill Lynch and
Paine Webber
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to proceed with preliminary
1993 SWAP structuring, utilizing underwriters Merrill Lynch and
PaineWebber on a fee contingency basis, subject to final authorization by
the Boards to conduct the transaction.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Directing staff and General
Counsel to submit a list of
three firms to provide special
bond counsel services
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, directed to submit a list
of three firms to provide special bond counsel services for the 1993 SWAP
for consideration by the Boards.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to Standard and
Poor's Rating Agency for
review of 1993 SWAP
structures
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to
Standard and Poor's Rating Agency for review of 1993 SWAP structures in
an amount not to exceed $30,000.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record
-11-
04/14/93
Authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to Moody's
Rating Agency for review of
1993 SWAP structures
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to
Moody's Rating Agency for review of 1993 SWAP structures in an amount
not to exceed $30,000.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Advanced Refunding
Certificates of Participation. 1993
Series I
Authorizing staff and Merrill
Lynch to proceed with
preliminary steps necessary
to structure and bring to market
the 1993 Series I
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff and Merrill Lynch be, and are hereby, authorized to proceed with
preliminary steps necessary to structure and bring to market the 1993
Series I, on a fee contingency basis, subject to final authorization by the
Boards to conduct the transaction.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Authorizing staff and General
Counsel to submit a list of three
firms to provide special bond
counsel services
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff and General Counsel be, and are hereby, authorized to submit a
list of three firms to provide special bond counsel services for the 1993
Series I for consideration by the Boards.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
12
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS �..✓
Actions re Course of Construction
Master Program
Directing staff and Robert F. ,
Driver Company to implement
the Master Course of
Construction Proaram
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff and Robert F. Driver Company be, and are hereby, directed to
implement the Master Course of Construction Program.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Appointing Zurich Insurance
Company as the insurance
carrier for the Master Course of
Construction Program
Moved, seconded and duly carried: �...�
That Zurich Insurance Company be, and is hereby, appointed as the
insurance carrier for the Master Course of Construction Program, at an
estimated annual premium not to exceed $125,625.00 in accordance with
terms summarized below:
-13-
04/14/U3
PREMIUM RATE: $.125 per $100 per year
LIMITS: $45,000,000 per Occurrence
Sublimits:
Earthquake: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence
and Annual Aggregate
Flood: $10,000,000 Per Occurrence and
Annual Aggregate
Transit: $500,000
Offsite Storage: $500,000
Debris Removal: $5,000,000
Expediting Expense: $250,000
�.,.� Extra Expense: $1,000,000
DEDUCTIBLES:
All Other Perils: $10,000
Flood: $50,000
Earthquake: 5% of values at risk at time of
loss subject to $100,000 minimum.
TOTAL INSURABLE VALUES: $100,500,000
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
-14-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions relative to Biofiltration
Demonstration Proiect amending
November 18, 1992 actions
�a✓
Authorizina the General
Manager to execute a grant
agreement with the Southern
California Edison Company
for partial funding
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the General Manger be, and is hereby, authorized to execute a grant
agreement with the Southern California Edison Company for partial funding
of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project in the amount of $50,000.00.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Authorizing the General
Manager to execute a
specific-term emplovment
agreement with Shabbir S.
Basrai for engineering services
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute a
specific-term employment agreement with Shabbir S. Basrai for engineering
services for the Biofiltration Demonstration Project for up to a twelve-month
period, at an hourly rate of $21.63 per hour, for a maximum amount not to
exceed $45,000.00.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
Authorizing staff to proceed
with the Biofiltration
Demonstration Proiect
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to proceed with the Biofiltration
Demonstration Project.
Director Roger R. Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this
item be made a matter of record.
-15-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and alborove written
report of the Building Committee That the written report of the Building
Committee's meeting held on March 18,
.J 1993, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving plans and specifications
for Specification No. M-044 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt
Resolution No. 93-41, approving plans and
specifications for Office Trailer Relocation at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification
No. M-044, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt
of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve the written
report of the Conservation. Recycle That the written report of the Conservation,
and Reuse Committee Recycle and Reuse Committee's meeting
held on March 25, 1993, be, and is hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to complete
negotiations for an agreement with That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to
the OCWD providing up to complete negotiations for an agreement with
`...� 50 mod of secondary effluent to the the OCWD, in form approved by General
OCWD for recycling purposes Counsel, that would provide up to 50 mgd
of secondary effluent to the OCWD for
recycling purposes at no charge, with a provision to, at any time, reevaluate the
valuation and pricing for secondary effluent; and to provide for purchase of GAP
water for 20 years at the audited cost to operate and maintain the GAP facility.
The contract would provide that the Districts' cost would not exceed the 0&M
cost or the lowest cost of any GAP customer, whichever is less.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing staff to execute an
agreement with OCWD for pilot plant That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to
testing of UV light disinfection execute an agreement with OCWD for pilot
technology plant testing of UV light disinfection
technology, with estimated $160,000 costs
to be shared equally in an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the Districts' portion
of out-of-pocket costs for outside consulting services, and $40,000 for the
Districts' in-house laboratory services.
-16-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions relative to Secondary
Treatment Expansion at Plant
No. 2. Job No. P2-42-2
Approving Addendum No. 1 to
the plans and specifications for
Job No. P2-42-2
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Secondary
Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, clarifying
miscellaneous mechanical and electrical items, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Addendum No. 2 to
the plans and specifications for
Job No. P2-42-2
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Secondary
Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, making miscellaneous
clarifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Addendum No. 3 to
the plans and specifications for
Job No. P2-42-2
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications, making changes to
the General and Special Provisions re Insurance Requirements, be, and is
hereby approved.
Awarding Job No. P2-42-2
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-42, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for
Secondary Treatment Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-42-2, to
Margate Construction, Inc., in the total amount of $14,496,000.00. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
-17-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions relative to Priority Projects
Element of Miscellaneous
Improvements to Facilities at Plant
No. 2. Job No. P2-43-1
Approving Addendum No. 1 to
plans and specifications for
Job No. P2-43-1
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Priority Projects
Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-43-1, changing the bid date and establishing a date and time for job
walk, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Addendum No. 2 to
the plans and specifications for
Job No. P2-43-1
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Priority Projects
Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job
No. P2-43-1, making miscellaneous technical clarifications, be, and is
J hereby, approved.
Awarding Job No. P2-43-1
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-43, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for
Priority Projects Element of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant
No. 2, Job No. P2-43-1, to Pascal & Ludwig Engineers, in the total amount
of $3,398,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a
part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive file and approve written
report of the Special Joint Works That the written report of the Special Joint
Selection Committee re Computers Works Selection Committee re Computers'
meeting held on March 30, 1993, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
-18-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving the three-phase approach
for the Computerized Facilities That the three-phase approach for the
Records and Drawings Systems. Computerized Facilities Records and
Job No. J-25-1 Drawings Systems, Job No. J-25-1, be, and
is hereby, approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That preceding with implementation of three-phase approach, ,
be, and is hereby, authorized.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Special Selection
Committee Re Computers to solicit That the Special Selection Committee Re
proposals and negotiate Professional_ Computers be, and is hereby, authorized to
Services Contracts) solicit proposals and negotiate Professional
Services Contract(s) for the phased
approached for consideration by the Boards.
ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors of
General Counsel's Comments Prior to the need for a closed session as authorized
Closed Session by Government Code Section 54956.9 to
review:
1) Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and
general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to the co-generation
internal combustion engines. �..�
2) Review of claim filed by Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon, Attorneys
at Law and receive recommendation of General Counsel re possible litigation.
3) Review and consideration of possible settlement of enforcement action
initiated by Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Convene in closed session pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9 The Boards convened in closed session at
6:30 p.m. pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s)
of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code
Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of
Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings.
ALL DISTRICTS At 9:50 p.m. the Boards reconvened in
Reconvene in regular session regular session.
-19-
04/14/93
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Denvina claim of Mudge Rose Guthrie
Alexander and Ferdon for additional That the claim of Mudge Rose Guthrie
fees for special Co-Bond Counsel Alexander and Ferdon for additional fees for
services re Advance Refunding special Co-Bond Counsel services re
Certificates of Participation. Advance Refunding Certificates of
1992 Series Participation, 1992 Series, be, and is
hereby, respectively denied.
Director Stanton requested that his abstention from voting on this item be made a
matter of record.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Settlement Agreement
with Velie Circuits pertaining to That the proposed Settlement Agreement
Enforcement Action re Industrial with Velie Circuits pertaining to Enforcement
Waste Permit No. 6-1-144 Action re Industrial Waste Permit
No. 6-1-144, as recommended by staff and
General Counsel, be, and is hereby, approved; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager is hereby authorized to execute said
agreement, in form approved by General Counsel.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item
relative to Repairs and Modifications
Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2.
Specification No. R-040
Verbal staff report
Director of Engineering, Tom Dawes, reported that recently staff did some
testing on two of the six new digester gas flares. One was tested at each
plant and it was discovered that the flares were not in compliance with
Districts' AQMD requirements, by a minor amount. Staff notified the South
Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), as required, and a
variance was granted for 30 days to fix the two flares. The flares were
repaired under emergency staff authority, tested and are now operating
within the limits imposed by SCAQMD.
Mr. Dawes further reported that staff then began an inspection of the other
four flares and believes they are also in need of repair. The major work
needed is to replace burners, which actually melted down due to excessive
temperatures, and to modify certain controls which will change the air and
digester gas mix and burning temperatures. SCAQMD is being requested to
grant a second variance for the other flares.
-20-
04/14/93
Mr. Dawes stated authority was being requested to hire the burner
manufacturer, Sur-Lite Corporation, to do the repairs and to conduct monthly
inspections of the burners while they are in operation, for up to two years.
It is expected that they will be taken out of service and placed in a standby
mode before the two-year period is up as the central generation facilities �,.✓
should be brought on line by then.
Following a brief discussion, the following actions were taken.
Authorizing consideration of
Supplemental Agenda Item
relative to Repairs and
Modifications to Flares at Plant
Nos. 1 and 2. Specification
No. R-040
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of a
supplemental agenda item relative to Repairs and Modifications to Flares at
Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040, which was not posted 72
hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request to take said
action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted.
Receive and file Staff Report
Moved, seconded and duly carried: �✓
That the Staff Report dated April 8, 1993, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed.
Authorizing staff to issue a
purchase order to Sur-Lite
Corporation for Repairs and
Modifications to Flares at Plants
Nos. 1 and 2. Specification
No. R-040
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Sur-Lite
Corporation in an amount not to exceed $129,400.00 for Repairs and
Modifications to Flares at Plants Nos. 1 and 2, Specification No. R-040.
-21-
04/14/93
DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the Selection Committee
to negotiate a Professional Services That the Selection Committee be, and is
Agreement with Boyle Engineerina hereby, authorized to solicit a proposal and
Corporation for the Preparation of negotiate a Professional Services Agreement
plans and specifications for Contract with Boyle Engineering Corporation for the
No. 7-23 preparation of plans and specifications for
Gisler-Red Hill Parallel Force Main, from
College Avenue Pump Station to Iowa Street, Contract No. 7-23.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
-22-
04/14/93
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors `..�
of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared
the meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Professional Services
Agreement with The Keith Companies That the Selection Committee certification
to design Contract No. 3-36R of the final negotiated fee relative to the
Professional Services Agreement with The
Keith Companies to design Replacement of Westminster Avenue Force Mains (First
and Second Units), and New Westside Pump Station Force Main, Contract
No. 3-36R, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and
FURTHER MOVED: That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution
No. 93-44-3, approving said agreement with The Keith Companies for said
services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses,
subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $85,683.00.
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 3
Actions pertaining to request to
reduce sewer connection charges for
Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen
Apartments in the City of Stanton
Receive and file Staff Report
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Staff Report dated April 7, 1993, re Request for Consideration of
Reduced Connection charges for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen
Apartments in the City of Stanton, be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed.
-23-
04/14/93
Receive and file letter from
Jan Development Co.
requesting reduction of
\� connection charges
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the letter from Jan Development Co. dated March 17, 1993, requesting
reduction of connection charges for Park Stanton Place Senior Citizen
Apartments in the City of Stanton, be, and is hereby, received and ordered
filed.
Receive and file letter from
District Chairman Sal Sapien
requesting consideration of
reduction of connection charges
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the letter four District Chairman Sal Sapien dated March 18, 1993,
requesting consideration of a reduction of sewer connection charges for Park
Stanton Place Senior Citizen Apartments in the City of Stanton, be, and is
hereby, received and ordered filed.
Referring request to Fiscal
�...� Policy Committee
Following a motion to have staff conduct a study on whether a reduction of
connection charges for low income and/or senior citizen housing is
appropriate, the General Counsel was asked to comment. Mr. Woodruff
reported that this is not the first time that a request of this nature has been
presented to the Districts, but none have been granted. There have been
similar requests in several of the other Districts. He pointed out that the
request is to reduce the sewer connection charges. These charges are
established by ordinances that are adopted after a variety of procedural
requirements have been satisfied. The ordinances have no provision for the
waiver or modification of any charges.
Mr. Woodruff pointed out that in order to effectively reduce the sewer
connection charges, the Board would need to conduct hearings and process
an ordinance amendment, which would probably include various findings
that would have to be made in order to justify the amendment.
-24-
04/14/93
He further advised that in the early 1970's and 1980's, the Districts
received certain grant monies under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act.
Hundreds of millions of dollars were received for the building of Plant 1 and
Plant 2 facilities. One of the statutory requirements under federal law was
that the Districts had to adopt a comprehensive revenue program. One `a.✓
component of that program was that there be an established uniform, fair
and equitable levy of charges and assessments, and that all parties must pay -
on a fair and equitable basis. He stated that if one property owner was
allowed to pay a lesser charge than all other owners in that area, the District
could be found in violation of the requirement which might jeopardize the
District's grant monies.
The Directors then entered into a discussion regarding the equitability of
connection charges, the financial impact on the District and other aspects of
reducing charges for some properties, and the uniformity of fee policies
among the several Districts. During the discussion the Chair also recognized
Mr. Edward Czuker, Vice President of Jan Development Company, the
project's developer, who addressed the Directors in support of his request
for a sewer connection charge reduction.
Following further discussion, a substitute motion was moved, seconded and
duly carried that the issue of reducing sewer connection charges for low
income and/or senior citizen housing be referred to the Fiscal Policy
Committee for review and report back.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adiournment
That this meeting of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the
meeting so adjourned at 9:50 p.m., April 14, 1993.
44ov4l A r
Assistant Se t y the Boards of Directors
Of County S itation istricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5,
6, 7, 11, 13 and 14
-25-
FUND NO 9199 - JT D1S7 WORKING CAPITAL PROLESSING DATE 3/G4/93 PAGE I
REPORT NUMBLR AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COON TV
CLAIMS PAID 03/16/93 POSTING DATE u3/1U/13
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT ULSCR1PT10N
F . . 120330 ASH BUSINESS MACHINES S404.Uu SERVICE AGREEMENT
_ 128331 _ AMERICAN TELEPHONE 6 TELEGRAPH $1,3.3.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
- 128332 - ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP 525.710.00 ENGINE TESTING SERVICES M.O.11-I8-92
. '. 128333 AIR COLD SUPFLY INC $11.70 AIR CONDITIONING PARTS
128334 ALFA-LAVAL INC S1T0.44 BOOK
128335- ALLIED . SUPPLY CO $578.89 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
129336 BLAKE P ANUERSON $144.91 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT
128337 A-FLUS SYSTEMS 64.138.41 NOTICES 6 ADS
128338 APPLIED SIOSYSTE MS INC $145.71 LAB SUPPLIES
a 128339 ABC LABORATORIES $235.00 LAB SERVICES
128340 ARA01ER SERVICES INCUNIFORM REMALS
� � - 1283A1 ARMOA - VAC $
S9.47.4. VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
128342 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC 9494.15 WASTE HAULING PEES
128343 ART WORKS $10.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES
- - 128344 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. 31.236.DO WASTE OIL REMOVAL
I2B345 AU70 SHOP E6u1FMENT CO $506.43 TRUCK PARTS
12S 346 AWARDS A iR OPH/CS SIUO.85 AWARDS 6 PLAQUES
- -- 128347 BFI PORTABLE SERVICES SS5.31 - RENTAL EQUIPMENT
12830E KKK LANDFILL 51.063.64 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
x 0 128349 BRW SAFETY 6 SUPPLY $1,133.86 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128350 BAKER PLYWOOD CC INC $1,927.13 BUILDING MATERIALS
�. 128351 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS 3243.40 BOOKS
128352 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 5709.82 BATTERIES
Y -- - 128353 SAUER COMPRESSOR 3684.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES
126354 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 39.953.61 LAB SUPPLIES
F. 129355 BEACH PAVING INC. 59.200.00 PAVING SERVICES
128356 DON C BEATTIE P.E. $200.60 MACHINE REPAIRS
1p 128357 BELL SECURITY $15.768.50 TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES
128358 WT DILLARD INC 3225.41 _ MACHINE REPAIRS
128359 " SIOSAFETY SYSTEMS. INC. $88.37 LAB SUPPLIES
128360 BISHOP COMPANY $212.95 TOOLS
128361 BUEhRINGER MANNHEIM $233.19 LAB SUPPLIES
128362 BOLSA RADIATOR -SERVICE 938.40 RADIATOR REPAIRS "
0 120363 SORNEMANN PUMPS. INC $22.903.26 PUMP PARTS
128364 DOYLE ENGINEERING CORP 435.973.8b ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-20
- - 129365 BRENNER-FIEDLER 6 ASSOC IN $173.47 PUMP PARTS
128366 BROOKLYN TMERMOMETLH CO IN $109.55 LAB SUPPLIES
126367 BUILDER-S EMPORIUM SE9.09 HARDWARE/LUMBER
128368" - THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFF 1165.40 SUBSCRIPTION
� .. 126369 BURKE ENGINEERING CO S.34.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS
126370 GARY G SYNCED $5.308.13 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
` - - 126371 BUTLER FAPER COMPANY /708.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128372 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS. INL $3,391.53 SERVICE AGREEMENT
126373 CS COMPANY 3A.357.22 VALVE PARTS
- 128374 1993 CWPCA CONFERENCE 62.23i.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
128375 CAL-PAC CHE NICAL CO INC $231.69 CHEMICALS
- .1
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING URIC 3/E4/93 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CUUNTV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS FAIR 03/10/93 POSTING DATE 03/30/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
! I 128376 CALTROL IWC S5.ub U.93 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIER
120377 CALIFORNIA AU70MATIC GATE 4312.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128370 JOHN CAROLLO ENLINEERS $9.161.05 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36
128379 CENTURY SAFETY INST 8 SUPP se.e96.05 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128388 BRUCE CHAPMAN 35,300.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
128381 CLARM CONSULTANTS S3.49C.01 CONSULTING SERVICES
' 128362 COLICH AND SONS $962.241.60 CONSTRUCTION I-9
128383 COMMUNICATIONS CENTLN 5585.b9 2-MAY RADIO EQUIPMENT
"- 128384 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $3,136.78 PUMP PARTS
i 128385 CONPUSA. INC. $274.57 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
12b386 CONNELL GM PARTS / UIV S50.91 TRUCE PARTS
228367 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 64,926.73 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
126388 CONSULIOAILD FREIoH7VAYS $452.86 FREIGHT CHARGES
128389 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $2.724.06 TOOLS
1 128390 ' CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO S"616.25 CHLORINE
_ 128391 CONTINENTAL GRAPHICS S12013N OFFICE SUPPLIES
., 126392 CONTROLCO f602.3n ELECTRIC PARTS
126393 COSTA MESA AUTO SUFFLY S564.24 TRUCK PARTS
X 12b394 COSTAR CORE $268.77 LAB SUPPLIES
_ 128395 COUN7V WHOLESALE LLECINIC 55V3.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
128396 CMARLES P CRVWLEY CO 5176.2L INSTRUMENT PARTS
ld 128397 OHL INC 81.3b4.67 ENGINE PARTS
128398 D A S CONVEYORS $1.332.00 CONVEYOR REPAIRS
128199 DAN TEES TIRE SERVICE 5468.5W TIRES
Sa • 128460 DAFFER TIN S742.40 TIRES
1 12b4Ol PETER C DAVID CU 4172.327.24 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2
rl3 - 1284C2 PETER C DAVID CO $1.3,654.27 CONSTRUCTION 3-24-2
128403 DEAVER MANUFACTURING CO. $327.05 TRUCK PARTS
120404 DECRA-TRCND 8199.L7 HARDWARE
128405 CC GDELLE a SONS GLASS CO $29.09 BUILDING MATERIALS
126406 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $3,750.51 ANIONIC POLYMER H.O.0-12-92
128407 OIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $677.21 PRINTING
128408 DIGITAL EQUIPMLNT CORP S751.04 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
128409 SYCON CORP 9137.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128410 DISCO PRINT COMPANY 32.136.94 OFFICE FURNITURE
128421 DISPOSAL CONTRUL SERVICE IN $13.010.86 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL
129412 DORADO EN7LRPRISLS INC $44,972.18 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
128413 DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY Sb20.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128414 DU
CORP $177.b8 MECHANICAL PARTS
128915 IASTNAN INC 52.940.19 OPFICB SUPPLI88
228426 FCOANALYSIS INC 5220.0E OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91
228417 ECONOMICS PRESS INC 52.704.00 PUBLICATIONS
' 12841E EDUCATION4L DEVELOPMENT SPLC $659.66 EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS
128419 ELECT AIR TOOL Cu 42,973.69 MECHANICAL PARTS
128420 ELECTRU DYNAMIC SERVICES $3.220.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ELECTRICAL
228421 ENCHANTER InC $4.450.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92
/ I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PNOCESSINO DATE 3/04/93 PAGE 3
P EFORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID L3/10/93 POSTING DATE 63/16/93
YARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OLSCRIP71ON
FT .' 120422 ESSENCE GROUP $399.21 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
128423 CHARLES EVANS L ASSOC. 382.041.0C LAS SERVICES M.O.11-18-92
228424 - FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE s3.690.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
1211425 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 696.GG AIR FREIGHT
- � 120426 FISCHER 4 PORTER CO $5.253.0b CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
228427- FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 68.b U4.27 LAB SUPPLIES
* 128426 FISONS INSTRUMENTS 1262.9i LAB SUPPLIES
128429 FLO-SYSTEMS 45,296.07 PUMP PARTS
-" 120430 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS Fi26.Lu PUMP PARTS
A 120431 FLUID TECH $956.06 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
�. 128432 FOLSOM LANE FORD $10.506.24 VEHICLE M.0.4-8-92
128433 - FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 4705.63 FILM
128434 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $243.41 PAINT SUPPLIES
128435 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES $170.12 MECHANICAL PARTS
" 128436 THE FOXBORO CD S3.744.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS
128437 FREEDOM IMAGING 657.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT
120438 CITY OF FULLERTON V25.53 WATER USE
m 126439 GANAHL LUMBER Co 12.128.77 HARDMARR
X 128440 GARRAIT-CALLAHAN COMPANY 31.943.81 CHEMICALS
= 128441 DRIES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS si.b G0.04 PIMP PARTS
126442 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $1,021.56 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
' 128443 GENERAL TELEPHONE CU 4224.30 TELEPHONE SERVICES
j 121444 LIFE TECHNOLOGILS/GIBCO/BkL 3168.74 LAB SUPPLIES
a 120445 GIERLICH-MITCHLLL INC $4.416.54 MECHANICAL PARTS
128446 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTOMS $330.80 FILM
W 128447 pUN GREEN 6 ASSOCIATES 42.245.01 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92
128448 HARKER EQUIPMENT CO 4615.30 TRUCK PARTS
128449 HACH COMPANY $1,696.09 CAR SUPPLIES
128450 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL FLASTI $136.43 SCRUBBER PARTS
128451 PL HAWN CO INC 33C2.09 ELECTRIC PARTS
126452 HOERbIGER CVS CALIF INC $566.29 COMPRESSOR PARTS
126453 RE HUGHES CO INC $2,709.25 PAINT SUPPLIES
126454 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $11.032.50 WATER USE
128455 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUbBEK STA 430.bb OFFICE SUPPLIES
126456 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $36.554.66 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-18-92
- ' 228457 -""" INDUSTRIAL INFORMATION HUWTkS $133.00 BOORS
v 128450 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SHOE CO. 43.595.4b SAFETY SHOES
128459 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 4668.56 CONNECTORS
128460 INGRAM PAPER 31,266.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128462 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 4166.94 RATER USE
128462 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 3685.12 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
128463 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO S105.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS
. 128464 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 3186.43 ELECTRIC PARTS
12P465 JONES CHEMICALS INC $2,165.69 CHEMICALS
- ' 12P466 JORDAN CONTROLS INC $78.46 INSTRUMENT
128467 WELLY PIPE CO 6737.3u PLUMBING SUPPLIES
41
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DAIL 3/04193 PAGE 4
- REPORT NURSER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION UISIRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
� CLAIMS PAID 63/14/93 POSTING DATE 63/lb/93
t ,I
WARRANT NO. yLNOUN AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
/? 12P468 KING BEARING INC >4.234.14 MACHINE SUPPLIES
126469 KNOK INDUSTRIAL SUPFLILS s1.393.44 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128470 MARTIN KORDICK SR >2,641.94 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
128471 LA THONICS 197b.39 CAMERA
126472 LAYMAN, JONES A DYE. LAWYERS 31,615.•5 LRGAL SERVICES - COOPER INDUSTRIES
128473 LEGI-TECH 1320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES
' 128474 LECO CORPORATION 4962.99 LAS SUPPLIES
128475 LEYCO ELECTRIC Cu 4314.69 TRUCK PARTS
128476 LICBC RT CORPORATION $364.74 FREIGHT
12fi 477 COUNTY SANITATIOn OISTMICT >L39.9G4•L4 POOLED EMIR. ESTIM. PLAN M.0.12-13-89
120478 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $933.33 OCEAN MONITORING
128479 MPS >ib.44 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
126480 MACOMCu 1320.bb SERVICE AGREEMENT
228481 MA6NETEK NATIONAL LLECTRIL >2.657.13 ELECTRIC PARTS
126482 MARTEN $323.42 JANITORIAL SUPPLIER
128483 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 1150.46 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
228464 MATT - CHLON INC $7,856.96 VALVE PARTS
rn 128485 MCCOY SHEET METAL WORKS IN •169.64 ELECTRIC PARTS
X 128486 MICMOAGE OF CENRITUS $3,527.14 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
2 128487 MIDWAY MFG A MACHINING 1.07b.50 MECHANICAL PARTS
12898E MISSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES 4190.82 FITTINGS
128489 MISSION INDUSTRIES S1,724.60 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128490 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO $969.60 ELECTRIC PARTS
128491 MLADEN BUNTICH CONSTRUCTION >297.106.CG CONSTRUCTION 2-30
a i 220492 NATIONAL FIRE FkOTECTIOR AS 15WV.22 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128493 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC a15O.04
VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
12849q NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL i138.70 WATERY FILM RENTALS
. 128495 CITY TI NLYP OR/ BEACH 515.51 WATER USE
128497 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SEPtliCLS .292.15 SAFETY CLASPER
128498 - THE OhMART CORP $4.292.15 INSTRUMENT PARTS
12849E OA SIS TOMS CO s34 HLI.Ob CHLORINE REGISTAkTIO
126500 ORACLE CORPORATION >i00.6A TRAINING REGISTES
128501 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUYPL $340.66 ELECTRIC TSPPLI88
128502 ORANGE COAST PETROLEUM ARUIF >340.66 TRUCK PARTS
' 128502 ORANGE COUNTY OV10 FARTS C 3b1.20 TRUCK PARTS
128503 ORANGE COURIER 1267.00 FREIGHT
* 128504 ORANGE VALVE A FITIIh6 CO. 41,229.22 FITTINGS
128505 ONGA NON TEKNIKA >1u2.3b LAS SUPPLIES
128506 ONI/EA CORP $1.842.10 PUMP PARTS
96 12P 507 0ITG EN SLRVIC, Sc.041.96 SPECIALTY GASES
120508 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S1r988.14 WORKERS COMP INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
120509 PSI *153.62 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
! 128510 PSSI 41.32b.50 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION
128511 PACIFIC FARTS $449.31 INSTRUMENT
128512 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 41,195.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES
126513 PACIFIC BELL $453.28 TELEPHONE SERVICES
FUND NO 9159 - JT DIST WOkKING CAPITAL PPOGESSIN4 DATE 3/u4/93 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
• _ _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COON TV
CLAIMS PAID N3/10/93 POSTING DATE 03/10/93
• �. _ WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
/ 128514 PACIFIC WATCH CONDITIONING C 168.46 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
;a 120515 PACTLL MERIDIAN SYSTLMS 31.627.:. TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
128516 PADAE JANITORIAL SUPF 32.492.79 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
128517 PAK WEST S1.132.B8 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
228518 PALMIERI, TTLEP, WIENER. 41163.b5 LEGAL SERVICES 14-1-1A
128519 PARAGON CABLE $36.78 CABLE SERVICES
12N520 PERKIN-LLMER CORPORATION S501.25 LAB SUPPLIES
128521 PITNEY BOWES 1530.W0 SERVICE AGREEMENT
y 120522 PITNEY BOWLS CREDIT LORP S163.18 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE
120523 POLVMETkICS. INC. $1.436.05 SERVICE AGREEMENT
128524 POLYFURE INC $11.268.19 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
128525 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY GO $161.75 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
9 128526 PRECISION GLASS BLOWING $228.40 LAB SUPPLIES
125527 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICL 3126.0C ICE
128528 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $4,160.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION H.D.7-17-91
12BS29 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS f2.350.83 ELECTRIC PARTS
126530 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO $3,138.82 TRASH REMOVAL
128531 RAININ INSTRUMENT CU 4121.47 LAB SUPPLIES
X - e 128532 RECYC INC S29.467.95 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91
2 128533 REMOTE MLTLR RESETTING SYST $5.000.00 POSTAGE
126534 COMMUNITY BUSINESS bRAPHICS 41,5.10 PRINTING
w 120535 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY 31.926.56 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
128536 RESEARCH PRODUCTS 191. CORF 173.96 LAB SUPPLIES
126537 REWES LNGIkELAING CO S4.868.75 HARDWARE
y Aq 120536 RICH COLOR LAD $29.63 PRINTING
128539 ROCKWELL ENb INLERIN6 L LWUIF $1.452.60 MACHINE PARTS
LIT 120540 RODNEY-HUNT CO 43.733.54 BAR SCREEN PARTS
0 128541 ROSEMOUNT INC. $429.69 ELECTRIC PARTS
128542 RYAN-NERCO 44.6D8.75 ELECTRIC METER
120543 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP $2,653.61 PARTS CLEANER
128544 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $1.232.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
126545 SANTA DANK 143.u12.00 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30
128546 DOUG SARVIS 41.125.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING
128547 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT.L S311.648.95 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-30-92
128540 SCIMED A CORP $156.50 LAB SUPPLIES
128549 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES INC $733.78 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128550 SEA COAST DESIGNS S1.b64.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES
12B551 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 3723.06 LAB SUPPLIES
'- 128552 - SHASTA ELECTRIC 31C.543.6U OFFICE EQUIPMENT
• . 126553 SHURELUCk SALES $2,143.12 HARDWARE
126554 SILVERS INSTRUMENTATION $347.50 LAB SUPPLIES
"- 128555 SIGMA CHEMICAL CU S269.U9 LAB SUPPLIES
126556 SKYPARk WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI 3db4.GG PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
128557 SLIDE MASTER $77.58 PRESENTATION AIDS
128558 SMITH PIPE L SUPPLY INC Si15.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
126559 $O COAST Alk QUALITY S150056.G0 PERMIT FEES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PAOLESSING DATE 3164/93 PALL 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION OISIKICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS FAID 63/10/93 POSTING GAIL 03/16/93
�1
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT UtSCP IP7/ON
128560 SCABNO UPDATL TRAINING $125.6. TRAINING REGISTRATION
128561 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 125.696.02 POWER
128562 SO CAL GAS CO $40,604.67 NATURAL GAS
128563 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CU $1.31U.56 DIESEL FUEL
128564 SOUVENIR PHOTO $19.55 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
128565 SPARMLETTS DRINKING WATER 52.21 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
124566 SPARLINU INSTRUMENT CO INC S219b9.15 METER
120567 STAMEN Z SPASSOPF Ft s5.95G.U0 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3-19-162
128560 VESTALLOY INC 41.043.35 HARDWARE
�! 128569 SPLAKER SUPPORT 572.73 PRESENTATION AIDS
128570 SPEX INDUSTRIES INC . s579.39 LAB SUPPLIES
"- 129571 GRECO FLEAIBLE 3464.96 TRUCK PARTS
128572 STANCOOS VACUUM SERVCE 51.072.57 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
128573 JAMES STANFILL CONSTRUCTION $1.900.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
128574 " ' STEMMERS TREE SERVICE SSoG.00 LANDSCAPING
_ 128575 SUMMIT STEEL $984.84 METAL
128576 SUPLLCO INC $103.31 LAB SUPPLIES
f7l 12857T SUPER CHEM COOP 31.LL..LY CHEMICALS
X 128570 SUPER ICE CORP se2.82 LAB SUPPLIES
S 128579 TAYLUR-DUMN MFG COMPANY S920.33 TRUCK PARTS
128590 TECH SYSTEMS 1211.53 TRUCK PARTS
bGEm 128581 CHARLES E THOMAS 5818.i1 TRUCK PARTS
1285b2 TMON PSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY s1.968.2U MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
126503 TONT•S LOCK L SAFE SERVICE $268.11 KEYS AND LOCKS
1 128504 TOSHIBA INTERNATIONAL 3419.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES
I 128565 TOTO LANDSCAPING CO $7,238.77 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.11-13-91
- 128506 NESTRONICS 4125.95 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
128587 TRAVEL EXECUTIVLS $138.60 TRAVEL SERVICES
.. 128588 TRAVLL TRAVEL $143.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
128589 - TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY INC $1,552.66 TRUCK PARTS
129590 JG TUCKER L SON INC $2,507.67 INSTRUMENT
- 128591 UHLER. INC $192.085.65 CONSTRUCTION 5-32
128592 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $269.00 LAB SUPPLIES
d 128593 UNOCAL 9121.52 UNLEADED GASOLINE
128594 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $400.30 PARCEL SERVICES
128595 DATAVAULT U S SAFE DEPOSIT LO. $1.405.GL COMPUTER DATA STORAGE
f 12859E VG/FISIONS INSTRUMENTS 19.299.53 LAB EQUIPMENT
128597 VVR SCIENTIFIC $6.919.67 LAB SUPPLIES
128598 VALLEY CI71ES SUPPLY CO 36.678.47 PLUMBING PARTS
� .. 128599 VANIER BUSINESS FORMS sb9b.17 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128600 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $164.29 LAR SUPPLIES
228601 VARNCR ACOUSTICS. INC. $1.605.44 BUILDING MATERIALS
. 228662 VAUGHAN COMPANY $4.981.25 PUMP PARTS
128603 VERNE-S PLUMBING 5210.06 PLUMBING SERVICES
128604 VERTEX SYSTEMS s8.037.56 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
128605 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 319.91 BOOK
n
FUND NO 9199 - JT DISI WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSIN6 DATE 3/04193 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
V _ CUUNTY SANITATION 014TRICTS OF URAMUE 'COU AT
i� CLAIMS PAID 03/16/93 POSTING DATE L3/1C/93
WARRANT NO. - VENDOR
4MOUNT DESCRIPTION
^, 126606 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEU. $29.69 PUBLICATION
.� 128607 WESTERN INDUSTRIAL TLCHNOL06Y $2.166.69 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
128608 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUFPLT 524.982.90 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.6-12-92
128609 VEST PUBLISHING COMPANY 3110.42 PUBLICATION
_ 128610 WITE6 $515.76 LAB SUPPLIES
128611 ROURKE S WODDRUFF 4 UK $56,152.50 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92
_ 128612 KEROX CORP f14.609.39 COPIER LEASES
4 228613 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $642.14 VALVES
- - 128614 GEORGE YARDLEY CO 4356.7U INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
129615 JOHNSON YOKOGAWA CORP $868.63 CHART PAPER
.12861E ZIEPARTH 6 ALPER/C.S. ALTER $16,096.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1
.... . -----------------
' TOTAL CLAIMS FAID 03/10/93 $3,073,814.96
...+
SUMMARY AMOUNT
X 42 OPEN FUND $404.99
_ 42 CAP FAC .FUND $332,365.00 -
43 OPEN FWD $25,267.36
43 CAP FAC FUND $275,991.51
-i 45 OPER FUND $1,026.94
45 CAP PAC FUND $82,968.05
I _ 47 OPBR FUND $4,029.23
'J _ 87 CAP FAC FOND $36,068.89
R11 OPEN FUND $921.30
R11 GP FAC FUND $320.00
_ 814 OPER FUND $66.00
414 CAP FAC FUND $863.85
r 4566 OPER FUND $4,079.98
4566 CAP FAC FUND $29,141.95
8607 OPEN FUND $2,303.10
47614 OBER FUND $7,747.69
JT OPER FUND $677,448.08
MAP $1,421,127.67
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $1,988.14
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $179,797.23
a. $3,073,814.97
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST BURNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 1
{ ry REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ...
CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATE 03/24/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
E ' 128651 AO TECH COMPANY 1187.149.9E
I20652 _ A T 6 T f3rB20.1] RESIDUALS RBNOVAL N.0.10-9-91
128653 ACCV-LABS RESEARCH INC $150.00 LONG DIBTANCB TELEPHONE SERVICES--
BAVIC68 -
LAB SERVXCSSEPA
14 128655 ADVANCED COOLING TE
CHNOLOGIES 1924.64 MILLER REPAIRS
12865E _ ALL PRODUCTS 6 CNLM IC AL IN 319rbbb4e ORBVALUE
A00.88MBNT CRY. GEN. BYBT M.0.8-9-89
12865E ALLIED EUFPEY CO ilr$60.00 VALVB
IN 120658 AMBER ERI STEEL E CULTURE
$99.00 PLAN 6 SPIES REFUND
_ 128658 _ AMERICAN TOPE CULTURE CULLLLIN 326.70 LAB SUPPLIES
12865E ANAHEIMM COUP $664.70 LAB BUPPLIS9
128661 ANANEIM SDIST DISTRIBUTION
110N $426.01 OFFICE
SLIER RBPAIRB - DIST 7
�••_ _ 128662 ANIX7ER - DIS CONTRO10N $230.90 SERVICE
SUPPLIES
- 128663 ANTHONYTNONY PEST CONTROL $374.79 SERVICE AOR8SM6NT
128664 A-PLUS
IE SYSTEMS f]79.73 NOTICU9 6 ADS
12866E APPLIED LI06Y STEMS INC f9$145.68 LOB BUPPLI68 ..
_ 128666 ACC (APPLIED BORATO COMPUTER SOLU110q 5195.6E LABCOMPUTER BUPPLI68
I 12866E ABC LABORATORIES f1r392.00 LAB BUPPLIRV
Y 128668 _ ARAIEM INDUSTRIES
INC 42.5E INSTRUMENT
SERVICE
X 12866E - ARENS IN INSTRUME INC $1,691d5 INSTRUMENT eUPPLIEe
X 12866E ARIL ODI INSTRUMENT 32&450.]2 INSTRUMENT
128671 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC $136.90 WASTE OIL INGREM VAL
pO 128672 ASBURT ENVIRONMENTAL SCRY. .803.00 WASTE
EMBE OIL REMOVAL -
�'.� 128672 AMSA f12$150.00 SUPPLABAIP DUES N.O.1-13-92.
_ 12B674 _ AUTOMATI TDATAA L 3ANIA FL NP 3150.O5 SUPPLY AGREEMENT
ESSI
- 126675- - AUTOMATIC DATA YSOCLSSINI $T553.25 PAYROLL PROCESSING BERVIC68AN '
12867E BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC 3518.2E TRUCKRESIDUALS
PARTS
F+ 12B677 BNM LANDFILL f2r 766.4E SAFETY
REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91 _
4J - 128678 BAY SAFETY 6 SUPPLY 465.79 BAFSTY BUPPLI68
� . 12867E BANANA BLUEPRINT RIC f$1,203.67 BLUSPDEFERRED
COO BTRVICES
ANSFE
12867E _ _ BABA OF AMERICA ti$117.20 _ PUBLICATION
COMP TRANSFER _
128680 BARCEAEM LAY PUbLI SN ERS 6.75.00 PUBLICATION - --
120682 B bATEMAN S546.40 BATTERIES
COMP DISTRIBUTION
_ 128682 SA77LPY COMPRESSOR
3596.1E COMPRESSOR
128684 BAUEE COMPRESSOR 3190.6E LAB
RBPAIRB _
r . 12868E BEATER PAVING
INC. INC 19,775.66 LAB BUPPLI68
128661 BEACH PAYING INC. i19.775.40 _ LAB
SERVICES
12968E BECRM AN INSTRUMENTS 19.341.3E TEMPORARY
BUPPLI68
126687 BELL SECURITY ' 33$161.07 LAB SUPPLIES
SECURITY SERVICES
12868E BID-RAG NLABORATORIES $550.00 TRAINING
BUPPLI68
12868E BIONECEAB A710N ST NY051 UM f550.00 - PUMPS
REGISTRATION -"
129690 BOYLENA NN PUMPS. G 312.810.62 ENGINEERING
___128691 BDYLE ENGINEERING CUSP s5 r299.35 INSTRUMENT SERVICES 7-19
128692-' bRENNIN-P IEOLER L ASSOC IN .026.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
� 128693 bRIININ EE LIE CTR IC i1r 026.5E ELECTRIC PARTS
12869E BR O4N AUTOMATION $2,272.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
--'128693 BUILOCR-S LMYOR IUN 201.26 RARDMARB/LUMBRR
128696 BURNE ENGINEERING CO $774.73 INSTRUMENT PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18193 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
__.. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATE 03/24/93
WARRANT NO. yENDON AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
II .� 128697 BUS" AND ASSOCIATES INC 312.14S.U0 SURVEY SERVICES RKS 5-051
128698 BUSINESS LASS INC $53.00 BOOK
_ 128699 GART 6 STREED $2,356.84 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
126700 CRC PRESS INC 387.45 BOOKS
126701 CS COMPANY R4.248.30 VALVE
120702 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC Sbtl9.85 TRUCK PARTS
128703 CALIF SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL $95.06 MEMBERSHIP ODES
128704 CARLETON ENGINEERS 411.325.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
128705 CENTURY SAFETY INST 8 SUPP 32,651.85 SAFETY SUPPLIES
I20706 CHURCH ENGINEERING INC $5.109.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-941
128707 _ COLE-PARKER INSTRUMENT CO 4344.53 LAB SUPPLIES
128706 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $1.018.50 MECHANICAL PARTS
128749 COMPUSA. INC. $987.85 COMPUTER SUPPLIES
128710 CONNiLL OM PARTS / DIV S120.30 TRUCK PARTS
121721 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 312.025.29 ELECTRIC PARTS
128712 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $5,346.39 TOOLS
128713 _ CONTROL CABLES INC 8196.67 TRUCK PARTS
128714 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $5.740.63 CONSULTING SERVICES
m 122725 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS 41.271.30 TRUCK PARTS
_ 128716 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW MAINT. 32,250.00 WINDOW CLEANING SERVICES
_ 120717 CAL POLY KELL0GG UNIT 5215.50 TRAINING REGISTRATION
to 229718 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL $6.72 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEES
128119 DAILY PILOT SV0.U0 NOTICES 6 ADS
120720 J.Y. D'ANGELO EO INC $7,515.57 PIPE
tv A 129721 DE ANZA CORPORATION 4150.06 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
129722 DEAVER MANUFACTURING CD. $19.84 TRUCK PARTS
N 129723 _ DELTA TECH SERVICE INC 314.008.b5 HIGH VOLUME OIL FLUSH '
.. 129124 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO $11,280.35 VALVE
128725 DIFILIPPO ASSGCIATES $2.395.58 _ PRINTING
128726 - - DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 59.953.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT
126727 DISPOSAL CONTROL SERVICE IN 31.774.51 TOXIC WASTE DISPOSAL
120728 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $11.562.99 _ PLANT MAINTENANCE 8 REPAIRS
:. 12ST29 ROBERT'F DRIVER ASSOC $20.400.00 - INSURANCE DEPOSIT -
1. 128730 SUNN EDWARDS CORP $787.72 PAINT SUPPLIES
_128731 EASTMAN INC W4.b59.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES
128732 - ECOANALYSIS INC $5.061.09 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91
128733 ELECTRO DYNAMIC SERVICES 33.680.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES - ELECTRICAL
128734 EKED 467.56 SAFETY SUPPLIES
•' -� 12073B - ENCHANTER INC 15,040.00 OCEAN MONITORING 6-10-92
'. 126736 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC 5862.00 LAB SERVICES
128737 MARSHALL FAIRRES $128.68 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
129738 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5.200.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91
128739 FEDERAL EKPNLSS CORP 3465.75 AIR FREIGHT
_ 128740 FERRELLGAS $122.58 PROPANE
128711 FISCHER 0 PORTER CO $4,792.68 CHLORINATION PARTS '
ry 128742 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 3.7.635.45 LAS SUPPLIES
'i FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 3
:-y ; REPORT NUMBER AP43
! COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
.•I _ _ -- - CLAIMS PAID 03/24/93 POSTING DATE 63/24/93
U I.I
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
? ,' 126743 FISONS INSTRUMENTS f/26.64 LAB SUPPLIES
128744 _ FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. S.54.GG CONCRETE CUTTING
128745 FLO-SYSTEMS $8.157.46 MECHANICAL PARTS
. '�• 128746 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $76.05 PUMP PARTS
128747 FLUID TECHNOLOGIES $2b5.25 OIL TESTING SERVICES
128748 CLIFFORD A FURKLNT 96.472.25 SURVEYING SERVICE OPEC 8-051
r 128749 FOSS MARITIME CO s1.062.V4 JANITORIAL SERVICES
19075D FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $299.78 FILM
r I1•__ - - 198751 - - FOUNTAIN VALLEY - PAINT t293.87 PAINT SUPPLIES
128752 BUD FRET $21.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
126753 CITY OF FULLERTON $30.66 WATER USE -
' 120754 GANAHL LUMBER CO 3301.98 LUMBER/HARDWARE
128755 GA/ES FIBERGLASS INSTALLERS f6.963.54 PIPE
128756 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $172.14 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
126757 - GENERAL TELEPHONE CO 44,554.65 TELEPHONE SERVICES
�•• 128758 TOM GERLINGEK Stl.000.Du DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
128799 N GLANTZ 6 SON $26.96 PAINT SUPPLIES
128760 GOV.I FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC. $355.06 MEMBERSHIP DUES
m 126T61 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $233.23 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
X 120762 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $5.626.25 FILM
CL CONSTRUCTION J-23-2
' r 128764 FRE TECHNOLOGY 3152.621.8E
*'. 128765 HARK A HARPER IND $1.062.68 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
126766 _ __ HASCO ION INDUSTRIAL PLnSiI f3.482.48 VALVE
12876E HASCO OIL CO INC f117.40 OIL i GREASE
A 129767 HAUL AWAY CONTAINERS 31.G20.06 CONTAINER RENTALS
t)v .. _ _ 128768 PL HAWN CO INC f1 T940.36 REIMBURSEMENT
-- 128770 HEWLE HA TDOCN .111.00
RBIMBURSBMBNT AGREEMENT
128771 HEWLETT PACKAxO $1$197.78 TOOLS
AGREEMENT
128771 MIL TI INC f$61.09 TRUCK
�•� 226773 HY STANDARD AUTOMOTIVE 125.87 - TRUCK PARTS"
_ 126773 NOENHUGHE CYO CALIF INC $125.87 COMPRESSORMECHANICAL PARTS
120771 _ AS HU6COR CO INC 54,116.89 CONSTRUCTION
BUPPLIEB
126776 HUNTER CORPORATION t151.$27.89 OFFICE
J-19-1
+;- 12877E HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER
SCHWI SlA f27.80 OFFICE 9UPPLIEB
128776 NU NTINGTON VALLEY SCxYIMN L 5130.13 BICINSTCLERUMENTATION
PARTS
-12:779 IOC f9.028.5U - IERRIC CHLORIDE CONSULTING
12S 780 IMPERIAL I WEST CHEMICAL f64.695.07 CONNECTORS
CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92
128761 INDUSTRIAL THNEA DED PRODUCTS f95.07 CONNECTORS
-- 12B7B1 - IN6R AM PAPER f260.13 OFFICE 9UPPLI89 '-
128782 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS f1.087.30 BATTERIES
12878 JLA CREDIT GORY .32
MICROFICHE READER LEASE
128784 GRLAT WESTERN SANITARY SUMP $883 5883.3E JANITORIAL BUPPLIEB
- 128785
a r• - J S CATERING .3 DIRBCTOR B' ME ETING BYPBNBB
12878E JENOEN INSTRUMENTS CO $910. 3 HRRDWAHE
12978 M• SUSPENSION SLRVICE S5G. 8 TRUCK REPAIRS
12788 KAMAN BEARINGS a SUPPLY $92.58
INSTRUMENT BUPPLI88
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18193 PAGE 4
REP OhI NUMBER AP43
.. _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COU NIT
CLAIMS FAIU 03/24/93 POSTING DATE V3/24/93
ll!.I
i WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMONN7 OESCRIPTION
126789 KARCHER INSULATION INC 61.99O.D6
.•4 12B790 KEENAN A ASSOCIATES $2.475.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
128791 KING BEARING INC $4,452.01 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128792 KNOA INDUSTRIAL SUFFLILS f[.423./1 MACHINE SUPPLIES
128793 MARTIN KOMDICK SR $2,900.30 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128794 LA CELLULAR T6LEPhOME CO $69.48 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-9
126795 LEE 6 NO CONSULTING LN4h $11.306.24 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
128796 KP LINDSTROM INC 64.932.b0 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-30-5
128791 SOCO-LYNCH CORP $156.20 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL
128798 MPS 52bl.64 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
129799 MACDONALD-STEPMENS LAB 611,210.00 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
128800 MACOMCO $520.65 LAB SERVICES
128801 hARVAC ELECTRONICS S02.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT
120862 MATT - CHLOR INC 97,164.32 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
y 12BB 03 MCtlAIN INSTRUMENTS $41.72 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
128804 MICRO NOTION 61N31.27 LAB SUPPLIES
. 128805 MIDWAY RFD 8 MACHINING $12,647.38 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
120806 MINE SAFETY APPLTANCLS CJ 5.25.52 BUILDING REPAIR$
X I28BG7 MT SSION ABRASIVE SUPPLIES $472.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES
S ' 1288G8 JAMES M MONTGGNERY Slu2.721.9b WELDING SUPPLIES
128609 JN MONTGOMERY ENGINEERS $3,124.28 ENGINEERING SERVICES H.O.12-12-90
to
228810 TOM MOORE $3.975.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES
128821 NATIONAL PLANT SERVICES INC f1.567.56 CONSULTING SERVICES
126812 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 569.35 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES
bO , 128813 NEVARM ELECTRONICS 6126.ba SAFETY FILM RENTAL
r 128814 OCS REPRUGRAFMICS INC 5121.22 ELECTRIC PARTS
128815 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICLS f605.44 LAB SUPPLIES
128016 OFFICE PAVILIUN/INTERIUN RES fI.Ob2.69 SAFETY GLASSES
120B1T OK STSTENS CO Ss9.633.02 OFFICE PARTITIONS
^• 126818 ORANGE COAST ELECTRIC SUPPL $36.72 CHLORINE H.0.10-9-91
126819 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C 5344.96 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
126020 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUFPLY C $70.96 TRUCK PARTS
i 128021 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. $1,444.27 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES
128822 4AY6EN SERVICE $2.611.91 FITTINGS
128623 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $3.611.17 SPECIALTY GASSES
-- - 128924 CSDOC SELF-FUNUEO MEDICAL 1 $240.006.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
• 228825 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT f7.bu T.39 PREMIUM ADVANCE
_ 128026 ROBERT L CITRON $108.60 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT
' 128827 PACIFIC PARTS $3,931.41 92/93 PROPERTY TRUE
�• 128828 FACT FIC $AFCTY EYUIPMENT CO 5876.03 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
I.. 12BP 29 PACIFIC BELL $5i.6B SAFETY SUPPLIES
128830 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C 168.40 TELEPHONE SERVICES
128831 PACTEL MCNIDIAN SYSTEMS $429.19 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
128832 PAUNE JANITORIAL 6UPP S482.72 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
128833 PAGLNET f67.56 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
128834 PAK WEST $547.10 PAGER RENTAL
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
FUND NO - 9199 - JT DIST YUNKINU CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 3/18/93 PALL 5
REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION UISIRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY NUMBER AP93
CLAIMS PA10 US/24193 POSTING DATE 03/24/93
WARRANT NO• VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
! ! 128835 FARKSON CORPORATION 5644.51 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
128836 PARTS UNLIMITED $1.550.7i TRUCK PARTS
.� 128837 STEVE PELLETIER $8.506.06 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
128838 NUY PENUERGRAFT 5460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128839 PERKIN-ELMLR CUNPURATION 45.J69.53 LAB SUPPLIES
128840 PIMA 6RU SYSTEMS INC 3295.BB5.44 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91
r 126841 PLAINS TRULVALUE HARDWARE $69.86 HARDWARE
_ 126642 POLVPURE INC 528.433.65 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
120043 PORVENE ROLL-A-DOOR $127.00 ELECTRIC PARTS
128844 POWER ELECTRG SUPPLY CO $136.32 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
228845 PRECISION INOUS7RIES $401.22 HARDWARE
128846 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS "06.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES
120047 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE S84.UL ICE
128648 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $3,100.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
128849 STEVE P. RADOS. INC. $163.804.00 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-3A-2
128850 RED WING SHOES 162b.77 SAFETY SHOES
128851 RIOT EXPRESS $92.95 MESSENGER SERVICES
128852 THE RL61STLR 51.35T.2G NOTICES 6 ADS
X128853 REMOTE METER RESETTING SYSI $5.600.00 POSTAGE
= 128854 COMMUNITY BUSINESS GRAPHICS 5112.3b PRINTING
128855 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $4,961.26 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
tz 128656 ROBBINS SCIENTIFIC $3,012.05 LAB EQUIPMENT
120057 J R ROBERTS CORP $135,270.30 CONSTRUCTION 0-23-1
f 128650 ROSEMOUNT INC. $949.84 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
CO 128859 ROSEMOUNT ANALYTICAL 41.187.65 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
128860 ARNOLD S RUMMELSSUR6, C.L. S2.183.74 ENGINEERING SERVICES
LP 128861 PE66Y WILCOX b540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
120862 RUSSELL'S CONST. CO. $300.00 CONSTRUCTION
129863 JOSEPH T RYERSON S SUN IN $629.46 STEEL
128864 SKC WEST $917.66 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128865 SAFETY WEST 5288.31 SAFETY SUPPLIES
128866 SANOFI DIAGNOSTICS PASTEUR $458.70 LAB SUPPLIES
128867 SANTA FE BAG CO 5242.4b BUILDING SUPPLIES
r' 128068 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 5765.03 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
128869 SEA COAST DESIGNS $412.57 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
126870 SHURELUCK SALES $7.026.26 HARDWARE
128871 SIEVERS INSTRUMENTATION S102.74 CAR SUPPLIES
128872 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO 5345.48 LAB SUPPLIES
. - 126873 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CL1 $2.923.00 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
126874 SMITH PIPE 6 SUPPLY INC 537.80 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
- 1288" SO COAST AIR QUALITY $5,597.00 PERMIT FEES
128876 - SO CALIF CUASTAL WATER 4.95.558.00 SCCWRP M.O.5-8-91
128877 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 4201.660.41 POWER
126878 SO CAL GAS CO $2.378.23 NATURAL GAS
128879 $0 CALIF WATER CO $36.96 WATER USE
128080 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CU 15.170.88 DIESEL/UNLBADED•FUEL
I
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE 3/18/93 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
. .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID O3/24/93 POSTING DATE 63/24/93
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
� � •i 128881 SPARKLE ITS DRINKING WATER 31.871.5O DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS
128682 _ WESTALLOY INC $179.18 STEEL
126883 SPEAKER SUPPORT $64.65 PRESENTATION AIDS
128884 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCL SYS $3.U24.16 TRAINING REGISTRATION
128885 STERLING ART $40.68 OFFICE SUPPLIES
12888E STE V ENS PUbLISHIN6 CORP SL99.66 SUBSCRIPTION
y 128887 SURVEYORS SERVICE CO $88.43 TOOLS
_ 128B88 TCH ASSOCIATES $1.406.69 LAB SUPPLIES
128889 TAYL OR-DUNN MF6 • COMPANY 5213.u1 ELECTRIC CART PARTS
120990 TH OMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY $69.98 HARDWARE
_ 128891 _ TRANSMATIUN INC 5323.03 PUMP PARTS
128892 TRAVEL EXECUTIVES 3455.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
128693 TRAVEL TRAVEL $481.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
228694 TRUCK 8 AUTO SUPPLY INC 3184.11 TRUCK PARTS
^ •+ 228895 JG TUCKER 8 SON INC 4637.99 INSTRUMENT PARTS
126896 TUSTIN DODGE $23.45 TRUCK PARTS
r _ 120897 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 31.728.00 LAB SERVICES
M , 128898 UNITED INDUSTRIAL TINE 3442.91 TRUCK PARTS
X 128899 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1209.81 PARCEL SERVICES
= 120900 VWR SCIENTIFIC $5.394.11 LAB SUPPLIES
129901 VALIN CORPORATION 51.591.71 FILTER
120902 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 31.118.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
128903 VARIER BUSINESS FORMS 341.99 PRINTING
1 1289C4 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $293.56 LAB SUPPLIES
OO A 128905 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUFPLV $13.650.29 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92
.. 128906 WESTRU3 INTERNATIONAL $68.7u TRUCK PARTS
128907 WHESSOE VAREC sli6.94 FREIGHT
128948 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES $21.352.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-31
128909 _ ROURKE S WOODRUFF S OR 399.629.6b LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92
1289ld AEROX CORE $4,168.65 COPIER LEASES
128911 GEORGE YARDLEY CO S446.95 VALVES
126912 NORMAN E CULVER .234.45 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128913 RICHARD B EDGAR 1200.U0 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
128914 RO8LRT H MAIN 3118.Ob DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
-----------------
* TUTAL CLAIMS PAIL L3/14/93 SL.62711.1.02
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 03/18/93 PAGE 7
M1 'L REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANCTS OF ITATION
DATE COTY
03/24
CLAIMS PAID 3/24/93 POSTING E /93
„I
n '� _ aauMMARF {6.70
AMODNT
.i IIFlUND
1 CAP RFAC FUND i58r971.00
2 OPER FUND {{3,916.94
92 CAP PAC FUND S31r731.68
3 OPER FUND 311197.01
3 CAP FAC FUND 2:183.70
5 OPCR FUND 5,726.59
65 CAP FAC FUND 3,024.00
6 OPER FUND 129.51
8 7 OPBR FUND 4,'179.09
7 CAP PAC FUND 6r 360.52
11 OPER FUND 2 325.20
21 CAP FAC FUND 2:949.06
14 CAP FAC FUND 9 Sr 943.50
9566 OPER FUND "
8566 CAP FAC FUND f3 o 28
JT OPER FUND ffff9 7:467.70
CORP 765 184.02
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS 219:122.16
Fr7 -- IT DIET WORKING CAPITAL FUND 403,015.16
X ' .............
S
_W
W
I
1
I
I
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held at the
hour of 7:30 p.m., April 14, 1993, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,
California.
The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order
at 7:30 p.m.
The roll was called and the Assistant Secretary reported a quorum present.
aaaaaaaataaatt aaf attataaaataaa
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing the County Treasurer to
make reverse reourchase That the County Treasurer be, and is hereby,
investments on behalf of the Districts confirmed as the Districts' Treasurer; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the County Treasurer be, and is hereby, authorized, upon
request by the Districts' financial staff, to make reverse repurchase investments in
U.S. Treasuries securities of a maximum amount of $50 million, not to exceed
ten-year maturities, and that payment of those securities be made by reversing the
securities against themselves; and authorizing payment to the County Treasurer of
a $200 flat fee per transaction; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to
confirm in writing with the County Treasurer, on behalf of the Districts, this action
of the Boards.
Directors A. B. Catlin and Roger R. Stanton requested that their abstention from
voting on this item be made a matter or record.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, PENNY KYLE, Assistant Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, do
hereby certify that the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of minute
entries on the meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 14th day of April, 1993.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my he d this 14th day of April, 1993.
Assistant Sec ary the Boards of
Directors of County Oanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13
and 14
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
J
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954. 2,
I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting
on /.(d1,ti" / �/ 19� was duly posted for public inspection
at the main "lobby of the Districts - offices on
19� I.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4"
day of q4M , 19-0.
&n�
Penny xy e, an Secretary of
each of the Bo rds of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11 , 13 & 14 of
Orange County, California
F27A.1