Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-02-10 N\iPbON COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS e' OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 'oN P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 ��HCE coup (714)962-2411 February 4, 1993 NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1. 2. 3. 5, 6. 7. 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will be held at the above hour and date. �4e� Assistant 17 grd,#cretary Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 17th, at 5:30 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - Wednesday, February 24th, at 5:30 p.m. CONSERVATION, RECYCLE - Thursday, February 25th, at 5:30 p.m. & REUSE COMMITTEE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 21 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 10844 EWS AVENUE v0.SOX 0127 FOUNTAIN VAU.EY.CALIFORNIA 82728Z I 0141 8 6 2-2 411 JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetinos February Feb 10, 1993 Feb 24, 1993 March Mar 10, 1993 Mar 24, 1993 April Apr 14, 1993 Apr 28, 1993 May May 12, 1993 May 26, 1993 June Jun 09, 1993 Jun 23, 1993 July Jul 14, 1993 Jul 28, 1993 August Aug 11, 1993 None Scheduled 1 J September Sep 08, 1993 Sep 22, 1993 �•s' October Oct 13, 1993 Oct 27, 1993 November Nov 10, 1993 None Scheduled December Dec 08, 1993 None Scheduled January Jan 12, 1994 Jan 26, 1994 February Feb 09, 1994 Feb 23, 1994 m, BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127•108" Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California fountain Valley,CA 9272"127 Telephone: (714)962-2441 JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA FEBRUARY 10, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specific agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. (6) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel 02/10/93 (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: District 1 - January 13, 1993 regular District 2 - January 13, 1993 regular District 3 - January 13, 1993 regular, and January 20, 1993 adjourned District 5 - January 13, 1993 regular District 6 - January 13, 1993 regular District 7 - January 13, 1993 regular, and January 20, 1993 adjourned District 11 - January 13, 1993 regular District 13 - January 13, 1993 regular District 14 - January 13, 1993 regular (8) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District.) See pages "A" and "B" 1 1 01/27/93 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - S 423,834.71 $ 1,221,939.47 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 970,961.11 1,873,435.73 Joint Working Capital Fund - 190,785.88 578,787.33 Self-Funded insurance Funds - 350.32 226,462.83 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 340.00 1,715.71 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 5,126.17 47,155.67 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 24,756.18 33,688.41 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 1,128.66 8,400.02 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 872.96 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 11,329.68 115,285.98 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 59.33 13,216.80 DISTRICT NO, 13 - 0.00 75.38 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 4,738.89 9,306.52 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 339.09 44,686.90 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,060.62 32.31 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 14.40 6,602.85 - 51.635.825.04 S4.181 .664.87 -2- v n 02/10/93 1 CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(i) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of motion receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding purchase order contract for Purchase of Twenty-Five (25) Sets of Filter Media (Belts), Specification No. P-130, to Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. for a total amount not to exceed $83,600.00 plus sales tax. See page C (b) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to PacTel Meridian Systems for Amendment No. 1 to the Telephone System Maintenance Agreement for the Districts' telephone PBX and related equipment (Specification No. S-069), to extend said agreement for a one-year period from February 22, 1993 through February 21, 1994, for an amount not to exceed $30,936.00 for existing equipment. (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No.18 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $267,851 .00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for six items of additional work, and `..� granting a time extension of 90 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page D -3- a o 02/10/93 ( ) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (d) Consideration of the following actions relative to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preliminary design report for Rehabilitation of Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-41, and Rehabilitation of Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48: (1) Consideration of motion to receive, file and approve Selection Committee certification of the final negotiated fee for said services. See page E (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-12, approving said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $59,806.00. See page F (a) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit a proposal and negotiate Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for design, construction support services and preparation of operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, / Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional effort required to complete seismic retrofitting of non-structural items. (f) Consideration of motion authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2. (g) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 56714 issued to Bell Securities and Investigations, Inc. for 24-hour guard service at Central Power Generation Buildings at Plants 1 and 2 and for worker's compensation surveyance, providing for an extension of guard services through the month of March at Plant No. 1 and through the month of May at Plant No. 2, increasing the total authorized amount from $25,000.00 to $50,000.00. -4- d c 02/10/93 1 DISTRICTS 3 & 11 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (h) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-17, approving and authorizing execution of Indemnification Agreement and Collectible Work Authorization with Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) for relocation of 8-inch and 2-inch gas mains required in connection with Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1; and authorizing payment to SCGC in an amount not to exceed $64,000.00 for said relocation. See page G_ DISTRICT 3 (i) Consideration of the following actions relative to Lampson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2: (1 ) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of $149,630.71 to the contract with Peter C. David, Inc. for nine items of added or deleted work; granting a time extension of 50 calendar days for completion of said additional work; and for contract-specified deduction for liquidated damages for 155 days based on the rate of $200.00 per day. See page H ..✓ (2) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of $5,912.00 to the contract with Peter C. David, Inc. for adjustment of engineer's quantities. See page 1 (3) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-18-3, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page J -5- r o 02/10/93 ( ) DISTRICT 7 - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (j) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-19-7, authorizing the General Manager to execute a Supplemental Agreement with Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company IAT&SF), to install and maintain a new manhole within AT&SF's right-of-way in connection with Abandonment of Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20; and authorizing payment to AT&SF in the amount of $150.00. See page K END OFCONSENT CALENDAR 0) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of items deleted from Consent Calendar if any -6- v c 02/10/93 (11) ALL- DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee and Executive Commitee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committees' written reports of their meetings on January 20, 1993, and January 27, 1993, respectively (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said committees: (1) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-13, Revising Districts' Procedures for Settlement of Claims Made Against the Districts; Settlement of Claims Made by the Districts; Collection of Delinquent Accounts Owing to the Districts; and Settlement of Civil or Administrative Enforcement Actions; and rescinding Resolution No. 88-61 . See page L (2) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-14, re Adopting a Policy Pertaining to Future Areas to be Served by the Districts, and rescinding Resolution No. 85-207. See page M (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee's written report of the meeting on January 28, 1993 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee: (1) Consideration of motion to receive and file Staff Report dated January 21, 1993 re Wastewater Quality, Treatment and Diversion Study (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (2) Consideration of motion to receive and file the Wastewater Quality, Treatment and Diversion Study dated October 1992 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material). (3) Consideration of motion authorizing and directing staff to proceed with preliminary planning and evaluation of alternatives pertaining to possible interplant diversion of wastewater flows to optimize water quality for reclamation; and that staff be authorized to discuss with the Orange County Water District, and other affected parties, the planning and funding of design and construction of such projects. -7- s a 02/10/93 03) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2): (a) Verbal report of Staff and General Counsel (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 5 to the plans and specifications for said project, making miscellaneous technical clarifications and modifications. (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Culp Construction Company dated January 20, 1993, protesting award of Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) to the apparent three low bidders, alleging that their bids do not meet the specifications. See page N (d) Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel's Memorandum dated January 25, 1993, relative to bid protest. See page Q (a) Oral comments, if any (f) Staff and Counsel response to comments (g) Board consideration of said protest (h) Consideration of motion rejecting the bid protest filed by Culp Construction Company; or other action deemed appropriate by the Boards. (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-15, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation, waiving the bid irregularity of Javaid Contractors, Inc., and awarding contract for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) to Javaid Contractors, Inc., in the total corrected amount of $2,284,864.00; or other action deemed appropriate by the Boards. See page P 8 i S 02/10/93 (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions relative to Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28 (Rebid): (a) Verbal report of Staff and General Counsel (b) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said job, making miscellaneous clarifications to the contract documents.. (c) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Canus Corporation dated January 20, 1993, protesting award of Job No. J-28 (Rebid) to the apparent low bidder, alleging that the bid did not meet the specifications. See page 0 Id) Consideration of motion to receive and file General Counsel's Memorandum dated January 29, 1993 relative to said protest. See page R (e) Oral comments, if any (f) Staff and Counsel response to comments (g) Board consideration of said protest (h) Consideration of motion rejecting bid protest filed by Canus Corporation, or other action deemed appropriate by the Boards. (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 93-16, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for said project to Soffa Electric, Inc., in the total amount of $312,000.00; or other action deemed appropriate by the Boards. See page S -9- �J o 02/10/93 (15) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or 54957.6. Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors on any of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. 116) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (18) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (19) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (20) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (21) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any 1221 DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn -10- 02/10/93 (23) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (24) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (25) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (26) 'DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (27) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (28) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn (29) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (30) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (32) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn (33) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (34) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn -11- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 6127.10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 9272"127 Telephone:(714) 962-2411 �.- JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE FEBRUARY 10, 1993 AT 7:30 P.M. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self- explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9(a): AWARDING PURCHASE OF TWENTY-FIVE (25) SETS OF FILTER MEDIA (BELTS). SPECIFICATION NO. P-130. The Districts' operate twenty-three (23) belt filter presses to dewater digester sludge prior to transport off-site for beneficial reuse. Each press is operated approximately 5,000 hours per year. The average life of a set of belts for these units is approximately 4,000 hours. Districts' staff has previously performed extensive filter belt evaluations and performance testing to prequalify filter belt manufacturers. Of the fourteen belts tested from five manufacturers, only two belts met the test criteria. The Districts prequalified the two suppliers as satisfactory for the filter press dewatering needs. In order to maintain a supply of replacement belts, staff has solicited sealed bids for twenty-five sets of belts to be delivered at a rate of five sets every other month for ten months. Sealed bids were received from the two prequalified suppliers, Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. and National Filter Media Corporation. The bids ranged from a high of $96,900.00 to a low of $83,600.00. Staff recommends award of Purchase of Twenty-Five Sets of Filter Media (Belts), Specification No. P-130, to be made to Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc., the lowest bidder, in the amount of $83,600.00, plus sales tax. Freight is included in the bid price. The low bid represents a decrease of approximately 3% from the current `. year's contract with Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. February 10, 1993 9(b): APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 1 RE EXTENSION OF TELEPHONE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT (SPECIFICATION NO. 5-0691. The Districts own a complex and advanced telephone system which includes voice mail, automated attendant and digital communications features. During the past year the system has been maintained by the supplier, PacTel Meridian Systems (PTMS). Last year, the services of PTMS and capabilities of other vendors of similar services were evaluated by staff. PTMS was determined to be the superior choice for maintenance services because of the size of the firm, the size of their parts inventory (nearly twice that of other firms), the quality of the service provided during the past year, and their reputation within the industry; and a one- year maintenance agreement was awarded by the Boards. The primary factor in calculating PBX maintenance costs is the "port" or termination count for phones, trunks, data connections, etc. Last year's costs were $2,282 per month, or $27,384 per year, with a per port cost of $56.64 per year. With the last year's PBX system growth, our port count has increased and this year's costs are $2,578 per month, or $30,936 per year, with a reduced per port cost of $54.84 per year. Staff recommends Amendment No. 1 to the Telephone System Maintenance Agreement with PTMS be approved to extend it for the period February 22, 1993 to February 21, 1994, for an amount not to exceed $30,936 for existing equipment. 9(c): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 18 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. J-19-1. Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, is part of the $66 million master-planned Central Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at both plants. This $16.5 million contract includes installation of three prepurchased digester gas burning, spark-ignited, 3472 horsepower engines with generators, which are each capable of producing 2500 kilowatts of electrical power. Change Order No. 18 adds $267,851.00 and 90 calendar days to the contract for six items of additional work, including costs for correcting deficiencies in the gas-driven engines and related equipment which were improperly manufactured and prepared for storage by the engine manufacturer. The need for this work was previously reported to the Directors on November 18, 1992 and December 9, 1992 in conjunction with discussions regarding the Central Power Generation System engine problems. -2- February 10, 1993 Item 1, in the amount of $239,541.00, Is for the correction of certain deficiencies of the gas-drive engines and related support equipment as recommended by the Districts' consulting engine expert, Advanced Engine Technologies Corporations (AETC). The engine manufacturer, Cooper Industries, supplied this equipment as part of the Electrical Equipment Purchase Contract, Job No. J-19A, for installation by a separate Districts' construction contractor (Hunter Corporation) under this contract. Under the terms of Job No. J-19A, the engine manufacturer is responsible for preserving and packaging this equipment for storage and also for providing Installation advice during the Installation of the equipment. The equipment was sealed and wrapped for storage by the engine manufacturer and delivered to the job site. The seals and wrapping were not removed by the Districts or the installation contractor after they arrived on site until the equipment was Installed in Its permanent location. The installation of the equipment was witnessed by the engine manufacturer's installation advisors. In September 1992, an inspection of the various on- and off-engine components and systems was performed by staff under the guidance of the engine expert, AETC. This inspection revealed deficiencies and contaminations of the components and systems which are to be corrected under this item. The deficiencies and contaminations are due to Improper preservation and storage of the equipment by the engine manufacturer, and for poor workmanship of items installed on the engines by the engine manufacturer. Work associated with on- engine fuel, air, and jacket-water systems, intake air silencers, lube oil coolers, . . engine lube oil pumps, lube oil filter/strainers, and contractor supervision and expenses are examples of work included in this item. This Item adds 90 calendar days to the contract and resolves all claims regarding time extensions and contractor supervision costs through January 18, 1993. The Installation contractor, Hunter Corporation, was unable to finish the project on schedule due to changes associated with the engines, associated support equipment, and planned revisions to the startup procedures recommended by AETC. Additional contractor supervision cost, job expenses and time extensions to complete the project as a result of revised and delayed startup procedures for the engines and generators will be included in a future change order. At this time, Cooper Industries denies responsibility for these deficiencies. Work to correct the engine and appurtenant equipment was authorized to be initiated by the Boards on December 9, 1992 to minimize costs due to delays. The Boards also directed the General Counsel to seek remedies and cost recovery from Cooper for breach of contract. Final resolution of this dispute with the engine manufacturer will be settled at a later date. -3- February 10, 1993 Item 2, in the amount of $3,930.00, is for removing the 2-inch pressure regulating valves originally supplied by the engine manufacturer and replacing them with 1-inch regulating valves. The original valves, supplied by Cooper, were too large to accurately regulate natural gas being supplied to the engines. The Districts will seek reimbursement for this item from Cooper. Item 3, in the amount of $13,353.00, is for installation of a metering cabinet required by Southern California Edison in the Central Power Generation Building. The metering cabinet is a new requirement by SCE and was not included in the contract documents. Item 4, in the amount of $1,938.00, is for providing additional raceway and cable for a dedicated light circuit for the elevator lights which is needed to meet requirements of the National Electric Code but was not required by the contract documents. Item 5, in the amount of $9,044.00, is for elevating the temperature of the flushing fluids during lube oil pipe flushing operations to 150oF, as recommended by AETC. This elevated temperature provides higher turbulence of the flushing fluid which provides more efficient cleaning of the interior of the pipe. Item 6, a no-cost item, is for reducing the retention funds held for this project to five percent of the original contract amount of $15,410,855.00. This reduction was negotiated as part of the settlement for cost and time extensions in Item 1 of this change order. No retention will be held for work performed under contract change orders, and securities held as substitution for retention will be reduced from $815,000.00 to $770,543.00. Except for Items 1 and 2, the above described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. Items 1 and 2 involve work to restore equipment which was improperly designed, manufactured, or prepared for storage by Cooper Industries, and these costs will be settled at a later date as described above. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $1,130,992.00 with 268 calendar days time extension. This represents an increase of 7.34% over the original contract, of which 1.58% is for deficient equipment provided by the engine manufacturer, Cooper. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 18 for a net addition of $267,851.00 and 90 calendar days to the contract with Hunter Corporation. -4- February 10, 1993 9(d): RECEIVE AND FILE SELECTION COMMITTEE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR REHABILITATION OF CLARIFIERS 3. 4 AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P11-41 . AND REHABILITATION OF CLARIFIERS D THROUGH 0 AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-48. In August the Directors authorized staff to solicit proposals for a professional services agreement for rehabilitation and correction of deficiencies on older primary clarifiers at the two treatment plants. In the last six months, 60 million gallons per day of new primary clarifier treatment facilities have been completed and placed in service at Reclamation Plant No. 1 (Job No. P1-33). The addition of this primary treatment capacity will now allow staff to take the older clarifiers, some of which date back to 1954, out of service for the needed rehabilitation work described below. The needed rehabilitation includes improvement to nearly all facets of the primary clarifiers. The estimated cost is $6 million, broken down as follows: Estimated Item Cost Rehabilitation of clarifier collectors, bridges and coatings $2,950,000 Dome support rehabilitation 500,000 Underground concrete pipe rehabilitation 1,450,000 Equipment replacement 1,000,000 Electrical upgrades 100,000 $6,000,000 The largest single item, estimated at $2.95 million, is for rehabilitation of clarifier collectors, bridges and coatings. Also included in the project is the recoating of various ferrous metal surfaces for which the original coatings are deteriorating. About nine years ago, the Districts installed the most extensive odor control facilities in the western United States to be good neighbors to the residents around the two treatment plants. Those facilities have been extremely successful, and have virtually eliminated odor complaints. However, covering the clarifiers creates an extremely corrosive atmosphere within the domes. Prior to the installation of the odor control dome covers on the primary clarifiers, some maintenance and -5- February 10, 1993 rehabilitation was done on the twenty existing clarifiers. This work was completed between 1984 and 1987. Included in this work was the coating of ferrous metal surfaces to protect them once the covers were installed. Nonetheless, corrosion has occurred. Thus far, nearly all of the corrosion is relatively minor; however, it is clear that the polyurethane coatings installed between 1984 and 1987, and additional coatings applied when the domes were installed, will not last and must be replaced. The center columns of the clarifiers include baffles that distribute the incoming raw wastewater evenly and assure slow velocities in the settling basins. These baffles need to be recoated or, if economically feasible, replaced with lighter fiberglass baffles. (Fiberglass baffles would eliminate the need for future coating and reduce the weight which will aid in stability during an earthquake.) The "beaches", which remove the scum by skimming and scraping, are also in need of repair and modification. Some of these are well over 25 years old. Various other miscellaneous ferrous appurtenances within the dames will need to be recoated or replaced with nonferrous material. Accelerated distress and corrosion have been noticed in the dome supports at the point where they connect to the clarifiers. The supports must be rebuilt to include more corrosion resistant provisions which will prevent further deterioration. (Separately, Counsel and an independent consultant are investigating whether or not the contractor or designer made errors in the original Installation of the domes for which cost reimbursement could be sought.) About four years ago, failures of certain underground concrete piping occurred. The pipes deliver raw wastewater to the basins and remove primary treated water from the basins. When originally installed, some as long as 40 years ago, the concrete piping did not include a protective liner because it was not a standard procedure then. While the rehabilitation work is being done on the clarifiers, liners will be installed on pipes that have not suffered significant corrosion and/or the pipes will be replaced with lined concrete pipe if corrosion is found to be severe. The pipes will be inspected as part of the design process to determine their exact condition and the necessary work will be included in the construction contract. The work will also Include replacement of worn valves and pumps, seventeen sulfide monitors, modification to scum collection equipment, and electrical system upgrades to meet the latest National Fire Protection Association recommendations. -6- February 10, 1993 Other work associated with the clarifiers, which is already under design in separate miscellaneous improvement projects, includes the seismic retrofit of mechanical systems that will be bid in the same construction contract. This work, already approved by the Directors, will be identified separately. Finally, in August we included soil solidification as part of our earthquake upgrade program. This is no longer included in this project because recent tests have indicated that a specialty contractor is needed and, since other structures are also in need of this soil grouting, a separate plant-wide soil grouting contract is planned. The Selection Committee solicited proposals from four firms and received proposals from all of them. The Committee has negotiated a professional services agreement with John Carollo Engineers to prepare the preliminary design report, based on hourly rates plus overhead, plus direct expenses, subconsultants fees, and fixed profit, for an amount not to exceed $59,806.00 Once the preliminary design report is completed, a determination will be made regarding an agreement for preparing plans and specifications, and providing construction support services. The actions appearing on the agenda are to receive and file the Selection Committee's certification of the final negotiated fee for the above work and adoption of a resolution approving the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers. Copies of the certification and resolution are attached with the v supporting agenda documents. 91e1: AUTHORIZING SELECTION COMMITTEE TO NEGOTIATE ADDENDUM NO. 3 TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO. P1-38. AND MISCELLANEOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO FACILITIES AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-43. On June 12, 1991, the Board awarded a Professional Services Agreement to John Carollo Engineers to provide engineering services for the design of Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43. Both projects included over 100 relatively small miscellaneous improvements to various facilities throughout both treatment plants. Two addenda have previously been authorized for this project. Addendum No. 1 provided for a change in the wording for the errors and omissions insurance coverage with no change in the contract amount. Addendum No. 2 provided for a number of additional tasks deemed necessary that could most effectively be completed through this design contract. Addendum No. 2 added $76,750; the total amended contract amount is $1,991,565. -7- February 10, 1993 The original scope of work required the consultant to provide the detailed design for the seismic retrofit of nonstructural items at both treatment plants. The nonstructural items include above-ground piping systems, a ducting system, electrical raceways, electrical equipment, mechanical equipment, chemical storage tanks, scrubbers, and bookshelves and storage racks in various buildings. This detailed design is based on earlier studies by Dames & Moore which identified the need for the work. When the proposals were solicited for the project, the extent of the seismic retrofit of nonstructural items was estimated to require 5000 hours of design work. All consultants that submitted proposals to perform the engineering services were required by the Scope of Work to use this estimate in their proposals. The exact effort was unknown at the time because a detailed field investigation by qualified structural engineers to observe the existing conditions of the seismic restraints on all nonstructural systems had to be made as part of the project's early work to quantify the extent of the retrofit. The Districts' staff engineers are not afforded the time to conduct this type of detailed investigation due to their heavy project loads. Therefore, the RFP fixed the number of hours at 5,000 so that all the proposals would be comparable, with the provision that an adjustment would be made once the full effort had been defined. The full investigation, now completed, shows that a total of approximately 8,000 hours of design work Is required for the complete task, which equates to an additional 3,000 hours of design work. Staff is recommending that the Selection Committee be authorized to negotiate Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for the additional work described above. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the addendum will be presented to the Directors for consideration. 91f1: AUTHORIZING SELECTION COMMITTEE TO SOLICIT PROPOSALS AND NEGOTIATE PROFESSIONAL SERWCES AGREEMENT FOR FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 1. JOB NO, P11-40-2. AND FACILITY MODIFICATIONS AND SAFETY UPGRADES AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-47-2. Through the routine activities of design, construction, operations and maintenance of our 294 million gallon per day capacity sewage treatment plants, small jobs are continually identified by staff which require evaluation and possible upgrading or modification. These small projects, which require more time than available for Districts' staff to evaluate and design in-house because of limited staff resources, are assembled into larger projects for ease of project management when using outside services. A number of these small jobs have been assembled for the -8- February 10, 1993 subject projects, Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job `-' No. P1-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2. Staff has prepared a scope of work outlining the improvements to facilities at both the Huntington Beach Treatment Plant and Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. The work will improve aspects of our activities pertaining to safety, operations, maintenance, aesthetics and odor control. There are a total of sixty-two separate items of work between the two facilities. Fourteen tasks will provide safer work environments, thirty-three tasks will Improve operations and plant efficiency, one task will be completed to meet South Coast Air Quality Management District permit requirements, nine tasks will improve odor control, three tasks will improve plant aesthetics, and two tasks will improve facilities and equipment access for operations and maintenance work. The tasks are an accumulation of relatively minor modifications or restorations deemed necessary by operations, maintenance, safety and engineering staffs. All of the work is on existing process equipment, and will require extensive coordination to accommodate ongoing plant operations during construction. The estimated total project cost is $3.5 million. Staff recommends that the Selection Committee be authorized to solicit proposals and negotiate a professional services agreement to prepare the studies, construction plans and specifications, provide construction support services, and prepare record drawings for Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2. Following the Selection Committee's negotiations, the agreement will be presented to the Boards for consideration. 9(g): APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO PURCHASE ORDER NO. 56714 FOR EXTENSION OF GUARD SERVICES RE CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEMS AT PLANTS 1 AND 2. The Directors are aware that the rebuilding of the Central Power Generation System engines at Plant No. 2 and the correction of deficiencies in the Plant No. 1 engines are now in progress. Staff has hired a security firm to secure the Central Power Generation facilities and buildings at both treatment plants to allow entry to only those individuals authorized to have access to the building and the equipment to avoid compromising the evidence being accumulated by the forensic team and to prevent other related problems. A purchase order was issued under staff-authorized procurement authority to Bell Security and Investigations, Inc., to provide a guard for around-the-clock security at both plants, as well as -9- February 10, 1993 providing workers' compensation surveillance as required. Once the forensic work is completed, the security can be somewhat relaxed. It is anticipated that guard services, which in the future will only be used when staff inspectors are not present, will now be required through March at Plant No. 1, and through May at Plant No. 2. Therefore, the action appearing on the agenda is to request authorization for Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 56714 to Bell Security and Investigations, Inc., to increase the maximum authorized amount not to exceed $25,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 for an extension of the security services. DISTRICTS 3 AND 11 9(h): APPROVE AGREEMENT AND WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY FOR RELOCATION OF 8-INCH AND 2-INCH GAS MAINS DURING CONSTRUCTION OF SLATER AVENUE PUMP STATION - SEWAGE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO, 11-17-1. During the past several years, the Directors have taken many actions necessary for the replacement of the Slater Avenue Pump Station, gravity sewers and force mains. The 1989 Master Plan and Environmental Impact Report recommended construction of a new sewage pumping station, replacement of gravity and force mains in Slater Avenue between Goldenwest Street and Nichols Avenue, a new gravity sewer line in Goldenwest Street between Slater Avenue and Heil Avenue and, in the future, an interceptor in Heil Avenue extending from Goldenwest Street west to Springdale Avenue, where existing sewer lines will be relieved. These facilities will correct existing capacity and structural deficiencies at an estimated cost of $13 million. A project report on all facilities was completed in 1990. Professional Service Agreements for the design of the pump station and the sewage facilities in both Slater Avenue and Goldenwest Street were awarded in September 1990. The first contract includes the pump station end influent and effluent force mains in Slater Avenue at a cost of $7 million, and the sewer line in Goldenwest Street at an approximate cost of $3 million. The Directors will soon be considering the approval of the plans and specifications for the first of several projects for the Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements. During the utility search phase of the design process, a conflict in both alignment and profile was found to exist between with Southern California Gas Company's existing gas mains and the proposed Slater Avenue Pump Station's wetwell location, because the pump station's below-grade `0e -10- February 10, 1993 wetwell will extend under Slater Avenue. It is necessary to relocate about 237 ..i feet of 8-inch gas main and 9 feet of 2-inch gas main to allow the construction of the Slater Avenue Pump station's wetwell. The Southern California Gas Company has estimated the cost of the main relocation to be $61,069.00, not Including contingencies. Final payment will be based on actual costs. The recommended action Is to authorize the General Manager to execute a Collectible Work Authorization and Indemnification Agreement, in a form approved by General Counsel, to Southern California Gas Company in an amount not to exceed $64,000.00 for relocation of the Gas Company's mains. DISTRICT 3 90): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDERS NOS, 1 AND 2 TO LAMPSON INTERCEPTOR SEWER. CONTRACT NO. 3-24-2. AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE. This $1.0 million project within the City of Garden Grove Includes the construction of a gravity sewer pipe and appurtenances within the Lampson Avenue right-of-way in Garden Grove from Knott Avenue to Santa Rosalie Street (just west of Beach Boulevard). Portions were constructed using tunneling techniques to minimize disruptions to traffic where the sewer goes under existing facilities such as a flood control channel. The contract is now complete. (1) Change Order No. 1 Change Order No. 1 adds $149,630.71 and 50 calendar days to the contract for ten items of work. Almost all work items deal with undisclosed structures and utilities encountered during construction of the sewer. Item 1, In the amount of $83,311.30 and 15 calendar days time extension, is for utilizing permanent-type solid sheeting in a jacking pit In Lampson Avenue in lieu of temporary shields due to the presence of undisclosed telephone ducts not shown on the drawings. The temporary shields and the permanent solid sheeting are both necessary safety installations to protect workmen in the jacking pit. However, the Contractor could not utilize the preplanned temporary shields due to the Interference of the undisclosed utilities in conjunction with the known presence of gas lines. Installing the permanent sheeting Is much more labor intensive. The undisclosed utilities were telephone ducts whose location was not provided by the utility company when requested _11_ February 10, 1993 by the design engineer. The amount includes a credit from the Contractor for not using the shields. Item 2, in the amount of $28,807.78 and 4 calendar days time extension, provides for the excavation, hauling and disposing of undisclosed concrete and timbers left underground from previous construction by others that created extra work and delay to the contractor. Item 3, in the amount of $10,104.00 and 3 calendar days time extension, is for the repair of an undisclosed water line that was broken when encountered. Item 4, in the amount of $876.04 and 1 calendar day time extension, is for the excavation around a purported 2-inch gas line, shown on the drawings but never located, causing the contractor a delay. Item 5, in the amount of $20,514.00 and 2 calendar days time extension, is for added work in which the contractor realigned and reinstalled previously laid pipe to make a connection to the stub in an existing manhole which was not built as shown on the drawings. This required a major amount of tunneling work. Item 6, in the amount of $27,295.32 and 5 calendar days time extension, is for excavation around ten separate undisclosed utilities, including water, oil, and telephone lines, an unmarked 12- inch steel pipe, and two locations where undisclosed, buried beams and timber were encountered. Item 7, in the amount of $9,943.00 and 8 calendar days time extension, Is for employing Southern California Edison to remove a power pole that was too close to the revised sewer alignment. The power pole relocation was required because of a number of undisclosed underground telephone lines that could not be relocated. Item 8, in the amount of $5,041.86 and 1 calendar day time extension, is for repairing a 6-inch sewer line not shown on the plans and replacing a number of traffic loops, also not shown on the plans. Item 9 is a credit in the amount of $5,263.49 for repairs to Lampson Avenue that were damaged by the contractor. The City repaired the street and billed the District. Item 10, in the amount of $31,000.00, is a deduction from the contract for liquidated damages due to late completion of the contract. With the allowed time extensions, the contractor was 155 days late in completing the contract, and therefore was charged damages at the contract-specified rate of $200.00 per day. -12- February 10, 1993 With the exception of Items 9 and 10, all of the changes were the result of utility interference. The plans were submitted to, and reviewed by, all utility companies and the best available information was used. (2) Change Order No. 2 Change Order No. 2 is the adjustment of engineer's estimated quantities to actual for a net addition of $5,912.00. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 1 for a net addition of $149,630.71 and 50 calendar days, and Change Order No. 2 for a net addition of $5,912.00 to the contract with Peter C. David Co., Inc. (3) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Peter C. David Co., Inc. has fulfilled contractual obligations while being assessed liquidated damages for the extended time of completion. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached with the supporting agenda documents, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $1,036,542.71 . DISTRICT 7 9(j): APPROVE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH ATCHISON. TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY RE ABANDONMENT OF NAVY WAY PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAIN AND CONSTRUCTION OF REPLACEMENT GRAVITY SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-20. The Navy Way Pump Station, built in 1969, serves a 950-acre watershed located north of the Tustin U.S. Marine Air Station, and generally east of Red Hill Avenue. As previously discussed with the Board, the Districts have experienced problems with Techite sewer force main pipe. Navy Way Pump Station has a single-barrel force main of 16-inch Techite pipe, 2600 feet long. Considering the problems with Techite pipe and because of a recent capacity purchase in the Irvine Ranch Water District's Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer (HATS), last year the Board authorized construction of a gravity sewer to HATS and abandonment of the Navy Way Pump Station. The Professional Services Agreement for the design of the Navy Way Pump Station Abandonment and Construction of Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20, was awarded to Boyle Engineering Corporation in July 1992. -13- February 10, 1993 Contract No. 7-20 requires construction of approximately 6,200 feet of 21-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) sewer pipe. The new sewer will connect to the Browning Avenue Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2A, north of the pump station wetwell within the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (AT&SF) right-of- way. The Browning Avenue Subtrunk Sewer is within the AT&SF right-of-way under an existing agreement dated February 1, 1963, Santa Fe's Secretary's Contract No. CL-67910. A Supplemental Agreement is now required to install and maintain the new manhole on the existing sewer. The only additional condition of the Supplemental Agreement drafted by AT&SF is that District No. 7 shall pay "a one-time administrative charge for preparation and administration of this additional installation." Staff recommends approval of a resolution authorizing the General Manager to execute the Supplemental Agreement on behalf of District No. 7 and authorizing payment to Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company in the amount of $150.00. General Counsel has approved the agreement as to form. ALL DISTRICTS 11: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF FISCAL POLICY/EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on January 20, 1993 and the Executive Committee met on January 29, 1993. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on their deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 12: REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE. The Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee met on January 28, 1993. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on its deliberations. 13: ACTIONS RE AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR OPERATIONS CENTER EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2. JOB NO. P2-23-5-1(REBID NO. 21. On November 13, 1991, the Directors approved the Plans and Specifications for the Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1. The expansion of the Operations Center includes the addition of 8,900 square feet of basement and first-floor facilities, the remodeling of 1,800 square feet of the existing building, and a 4,500 square-foot enclosed electric cart parking/charging area. The work includes new locker facilities, offices, elevator and general upgrades to the existing building which was built in 1977. -14- February 10, 1993 On October 6, 1992, nine bids were received for said contract ranging s from a high of $3,238,400.00 to a low of $2,537,193.00. Several bidders filed protests and following staff and General Counsel's recommendation, the Directors rejected all bids and directed staff to rebid the project. On December 8, 1992, twelve bids were received for Job No. P2-23-5-1(Rebid), ranging from a high of $2,784,700.00 to a low of $2,323,982.00. However, on January 13, 1993, following General Counsel's recommendation, the Directors again rejected all bids, due to bid irregularities. Bids were subsequently received on January 19, 1993, for Job No. P2-23-5-1(Rebid No. 2). The bids ranged from a high of $2,670,147.00 to a low of $2,284,864.00. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material. (1) AddendumNo. 5 Addendum No. 5 provides for minor modifications and clarifications to the plans and specifications and changes to Section 2-3 of the General Provisions and the Schedule of Prices regarding what amounts will prevail when there are discrepancies between unit prices and total price. (2) Receive and File Bid Protest A protest on the low bid has been received from Culp Construction, fourth low bidder, noting that the three low bidders did not fully comply with bid specification forms which ask that bidders list the license numbers of all subcontractors named in the proposal. Districts' Counsel has determined that there is 92 legal merit to this protest, as state law does not require the listing of subcontractor license numbers as a part of the bid forms. (3) Receive Opinion from General Counsel Attached with the supporting documents is General Counsel's Opinion Memorandum dated January 25, 1993 which states that the above-noted irregularities may be waived. Staff recommends receiving the January 25, 1993 Opinion and waiving the irregularities in the bids. -15- February 10, 1993 Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 5; receiving and filing the bid tabulation and recommendation; receiving and rejecting the protest filed by Culp Construction Company dated January 20, 1993;, receiving and filing Counsel's Memorandum dated January 25, 1993; and waiving the bid irregularity and awarding a contract to Javaid Contractors, Inc., for their low bid of $2,284,864.00. The engineer's estimate was $2,800,000.00. 14: ACTIONS RE AWARD OF PUMP STATION TELEMETRY AND MONITORING SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-28 (REBID). In January 1992, the Directors approved plans and specifications for Job No. J-28, which upgrades the pump station telemetry and monitoring systems for the outlying collection system pump stations operated by the Districts. This action is in accordance with the 1989 Master Plan, which recommended replacement of the aforementioned systems due to degraded reliability and unavailability of spare parts. In August 1992, bids were received for the project. However, a software licensing dispute arose and, upon advice of counsel, all bids were rejected and the Boards directed staff to reformulate and rebid the job following the resolution of the software licensing issue. (1) Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications makes several modifications and technical clarifications as a result of questions by various contractors during the bidding process. (2) Bid Protest On January 12, 1993, seven bids were received for said contract. The bids ranged from a high of $604,933.00, to a low of $312,000.00, submitted by Soffa Electric, Inc. A complete bid tabulation and recommendation is attached with the supporting agenda material. The Districts received a letter of protest from Canus Corporation dated January 20, 1993 requesting a formal review of the low bidder's proposed system, claiming that the bid submitted is too low. -16- February 10, 1993 (31 Receive Opinion from General Counsel Attached with the supporting documents is General Counsel's Opinion Memorandum dated January 29, 1993 which states that the protest carries no merit. Staff therefore recommends approval of Addendum No. 1; receiving and filing the bid tabulation and recommendation; receiving and filing Counsel's Memorandum dated January 29, 1993; receiving and rejecting the protest filed by Canus Corporation dated January 20, 1993; and awarding a contract to Soffa Electric, Inc. for their low bid of $312,000.00. The engineer's estimate was $400,000.00. 15: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. 4Ge ester M ger JWS:jt _17_ RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CAUCORNIA 109«Ews AVENUE PO BOX 8127 FOOWAIN VALLEY,CALROYMA 92729.8127 January 28, 1993 71.1%23e11 REPORT OF THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE AND REUSE COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: JANUARY 28, 1993 - 5:30 PM COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Present: John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Frank Laszlo Blake P. Anderson, Director of Technical Services Carrey J. Nelson Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Leslie A. Pontious Charles Egigian Nichols, Conservation, Recycle Phil Sansone and Reuse Manager Sal Sapien Susan M. Bradford, Principal Environmental Specialist Peer Swan Bob Omen, Assistant Director of Operations Henry W. Wedaa Wendy Sevenandt, Associate Engineer Vladimir Kogan, Air Quality Scientist Absent: OTHERS PRESENT: Bernie Dunlap Betty Mrgudich, General Counsel's Office Glenn Parker Iry Pickler Robert Richardson Grace Winchell 1) Wastewater Quality. Treatment and Diversion Study The enclosed Wastewater Quality, Treatment and Diversion Study, Final Report, by the Boyle Engineering Corporation, dated October 1992, and the enclosed staff summary report thereon (pink), dated January 21, 1993, were reviewed by Staff. The study was prepared to assess the impact of the Santa Ana River Interceptor, and existing and planned groundwater improvement and reclamation projects in the upper basin and in Orange County on the recyclability of water from Reclamation Plant No. 1, vis-&-vis the Orange County Water District's (OCWD) Water Factory 21 and the Green Acres Project. Staff reported that the Districts' content of dissolved salts (TDS) in the sewage has been increasing and is presently at a concentration of about 1,100 milligrams per liter (mg/1). The OCWD must have TDS levels below 1,050 mg/l according to its permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Report of the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee January 28, 1993 Committee discussion focused on possible new alternatives in addition to those discussed in the staff report. These included adding more treatment capacity at Plant No. 2, adding more satellite treatment capacity, greater source control of salts, such as through bans on water softeners, adding more reverse osmosis treatment at OCWD, greater control of brines tributary to SARI, and in-plant diversions. Committee Recommendation: The Committee recommends that the Directors receive and file the staff report, dated January 21, 1993, and the Wastewater Quality, Treatment and Diversion Study, dated October 1992, and direct Staff to proceed with preliminary planning and evaluation of alternatives pertaining to possible interplant diversion of wastewater flows to optimize water quality for recycling; and that Staff be authorized to discuss with the Orange County Water District, and other affected parties, the planning and funding of design and construction of such projects. The Staff will provide periodic updates to the Committee. 2) Fuel Cell Technology as a Potential Energy Source in POTW Applications At the last Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee meeting, Staff was directed to evaluate usefulness of fuel cell technology in meeting the Districts' energy requirements and in achieving air quality objectives. Staff reported on the potential use i and benefit of fuel cells at our facilities using the enclosed discussion outline (white) and the staff report (blue). Staff has conducted discussions with the only manufacturer of commercially available fuel cells in the United States, technical and scientific specialists and representatives of utility companies related to development, production and operation of the fuel cells. Additional information on fuel cells (green) was made available by Director Wedaa. Committee Action: The Committee authorized and directed Staff to pursue possible installation of a 200 kilowatt fuel cell system on our premises by the Gas Company, manufactured by International Fuel Cells of Connecticut. Timing would be late 1993 or in 1994. The unit would be owned, installed and operated by the Gas Company for research and marketing purposes. The Districts would supply a site and buy energy for 95% of the market price. The Committee authorized and directed Staff to maintain contacts with the fuel cell developer and other participants of two current fuel cell demonstration projects, utilizing landfill and digester gas. Staff was directed to report back to the Committee on the proposed location, cost to the Districts and contractual requirements for demonstrating a fuel cell owned by the Gas company. Staff will also report back from time-to-time on the progress of fuel cell technology research and development. Ref#330039.rp -2- E661 aagoloo U011dt/Od Ao-) 9UIer33UIDU3 3-YAOS poda& 1egIj ApnjS uoisjanip pue ;uawleeil 'Apleno jalemalseM r moat- oil - i - As r N610 t 933 — o � - z 0 , - n ( 9 'l M • o A � I 7 ' 8 u - 1 ,Ge eue 1 7 - c I 1 .O 4 S - PAN LY COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Wastewater Quality, Treatment and Diversion Study Final Report Prepared by QppiESSlq� �oppDVESSjn S y Fc+ y 3y mw z No.46970 m c> r.A19322 m c E%P. 30 95 a y Wy A iy C10 F�\e 9lFOf' ALVf " OF CAO William R. Everest, PE Julius Y. Ma, PE Principal Engineer Associate Civil Engineer October 1992 wW BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION r r Sable of Contents r Pace CHAPTER 1 -EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................. 1-1 Introduction....................................................................................................... 1-1 r Existing CSDOC Conveyance and Treatment System...................................... 1-1 Wastewater Quality Data Analysis..................................................................... 1-1 Brineflow and Quality Analysis.......................................................................... 1.2 BrineRouting Analysis...................................................................................... 1-2 Recommendationsand Conclusions................................................................ 1-3 CHAPTER 2-INTRODUCTION.............................................................................. 2-1 ProjectOverview............................................................................................... 2-1 r StudyObjectives............................................................................................... 2-1 r Scope-of-Work.................................................................................................. 2-2 Task 1 -Existing Sewage Conveyance and Treatment System.................. 2-2 r Task 2-Wastewater Quality Assessment................................................... 2-3 Task 3- Brine Quantity and Quality Assessment........................................ 2-3 Task 4- Routing Analysis........................................................................... 2-3 Task5- Recommendations....................................................................... 2-4 Task 6- Documentation Report.................................................................. 2-4 Task 7- Project Management and Meetings.............................................. 2-4 StudyTeam....................................................................................................... 2-4 r Acknowledgments............................................................................................ 2-5 CHAPTER 3-EXISTING CSDOC SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND TREATMENT SYSTEM.................................................................... 3.1 ExistingTreatment and Conveyance System.................................................... 3-1 r General...................................................................................................... 3-1 Reclamation Plant Number 1...................................................................... 3-1 TreatmentPlant Number 2......................................................................... 3-2 OrangeCounty Water District........................................................................... 3-3 r Green Acres Prot'ect................................................................................... 3-3 WaterFactory 21........................................................................................ 3-3 r r Table of Contents (continued) Page -^ Summary of Master Plan Recommended Improvements.................................. 3.4 General...................................................................................................... 3.4 Future Facility Needs ................................................................................. 3-4 Future Programs........................................................................................ 3.5 Compliance with Regulatory Agency Requirements.......................................... 3-6 General...................................................................................................... 3.6 Compliance with NPDES Requirements..................................................... 3-7 .. Current Hydraulic Condition of Reclamation Plant Number 1, Treatment Plant Number 2 and Their Tributary Trunks...................................... 3-9 Current Routing and Sewerage Diversions........................................................ 3-10 Upstream Diversion.................................................................................... 3-10 Plant Number 1 and Plant Number 2 Diversion .......................................... 3-12 CHAPTER 4-WASTEWATER QUALITY DATA ANALYSIS.................................. 4-1 d Upstream Sewers Sampling Results................................................................. 4.1 TDS/EC Correlation of Plant Number 1 Influent and Effluent ............................ 4-3 Sampling Results for Plant Number 1 Influent Interceptors............................... 4.4 m Discussion of Wastewater Quality Problems..................................................... 4.6 Nitrogen Concentrations in Plants Number 1 and 2 Influent....................... 4-6 Nitrogen Problem in the Plant Number 1 Filter Press Filtrate...................... 4.7 TDS Problem in the Influent and Effluent of Plant Number 1....................... 4-8 Source Water Supplies..................................................................... 4.8 Water Factory 21,Brine Recycling..................................................... 4.9 Water Conservation.......................................................................... 4-9 Home Water Softeners...................................................................... 4.11 CHAPTER 5-BRINEFLOW AND QUALITY ANALYSIS......................................... 5-1 Current Brine Disposal Practices....................................................................... 5-1 Identification of Potential Brine Sources............................................................ 5-2 Estimated Quality and Quantity of Brineflow............................................... 5.2 Projected Brineflow and Quality in SARI..................................................... 5-3 Potential Problems in Brine/Wastewater Quality Control .................................. 5.6 Hydraulic Deficiency of SARI in Santa Ana Canyon.................................... 5-6 Hydraulic Limitations m Plant Numbers 1 and 2 Influent Sewers................ 58 Planned Capacity Improvement in CSDOC Treatment Plants.................... 58 .e Table of Contents(continued) Pace CHAPTER 6.BRINE ROUTING ANALYSIS.......................__.............................. 6-1 Brine/Sewage Routing Alternatives................................................................... 6-2 The Baseline Alternative............................................................................. 6-2 The New Interceptors Alternative................................................................ 6-3 The La Palma/Magnolia Route......................................................... 6-3 ,., The Santa Ana River Route............................................................... 6-4 The Glassell/Grand Route................................................................ 6-5 Downstream Interplant Bypass/Diversion Alternative................................. 6-6 Description of the Proposed Irvine Brineline...................................................... 6-7 Routing of Water Factory 21 Brine and Plant Number 1 WasteSidestreams........................................................................................... 6-8 CostEstimates.................................................................................................. 6-9 CHAPTER 7-RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS................................. 7-1 Recommendations............................................................................................ 7-1 Source Control Strategies.......................................................................... 7-1 Sampling............................................................................................. 7-1 Discharge Qualtyy Goals...................................................................... 7-2 �. Discharge Quantity Limit..................................................................... 7-2 RoutingStrategy........................................................................................ 7-2 r Conclusions...................................................................................................... 7-2 Appendices Appendix A- Reference Material Appendix B -Wastewater Quality Data r r V List of Tables Table Pacle 3.1 Comparison of CSDOC NPDES Requirements, Annual Average Influent and 'r Ocean Effluent Discharge Values, 1990-1991 ............................................... 3-8 3.2 Reclamation Plant Number 1 - Influent Interceptors...................................... 3-9 33 Treatment Plant Number 2- Influent Interceptors......................................... 3-10 3-4 Comparison of Rated Capacity and Projected Total Flow in Influent Interceptors...................................................................................... 3-12 4-1 Upstream Sewers Sampling Results ............................................................ 4-2 4.2 Development of the TDS/EC Correlation...................................................... 4-3 4-3 OCWD Water Factory 21 Influent 0-1 -TDS/EC Correlation ........................ 4-4 4-4 Plant Number 1 Interceptors Sampling......................................................... 4-5 4.5 Summary of Water Quality Information-CSDOC Nitrogen (follows page)... 4-6 ,d 4-6 Comparison of Source Water and Effluent Water Qualities........................... 4-10 5.1 Summary of Brineflow Projections Tributary to CSDOC Facility Area (follows page)........................................................ 5-2 r 5-2 Brine Loading Projections Tributary to Plant Number 1 ................................ 5-3 53 Wastewater Quality Projection in SARI +� (Immediately Upstream of Plant Number 1).................................................. 5-5 6-1 Size and Length of Proposed Brine Interceptors.......................................... 6-6 6-2 Capital Costs of Proposed Brine Interceptors............................................... 6.11 6.3 Capital and O& M Costs of Interplant Diversion Alternative ......................... 6.12 6-4 Comparison of Annualized Costs of Routing Alternatives............................. 6-13 .d r se List of Figures Follows Figure Paae 3-1 Service Area Map of CSDOC........................................................................ 3-1 " 3-2 Reclamation Plant Number 1 Process Flow Diagram ................................... 3-2 3-3 Treatment Plant Number 2 Process Flow Diagram....................................... 3-3 34 CSDOC Joint Treatment Plant Flow Schematic............................................ 3-9 3.5 Flow Schematic of Interplant Diversion......................................................... 3-13 4-1 Upstream Trunk Sampling Sites Location Map ............................................ 4-1 4-2 TDS and Conductivity versus Time ., Water Factory 21 Influent 0-1....................................................................... 44 4-3 Chemical Quality of Colorado River and State Water Project........................ 4-8 44 TDS Concentration versus Time Water Factory 21 Influent Q-1 ....................................................................... 4.10 5-1 Location of Existing and Potential Brine Sources......................................... 5-2 .d 5.2 SARI Sewer Capacity Deficiencies................................................................ 5-6 6-1 Potential Brine Interceptor Routes................................................................ 6-3 r 6.2 Interplant Diversion ABernative..................................................................... 6-7 6-3 Irvine Brineline Alignment............................................................................. 6-7 .d CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY a INTRODUCTION The main objective of this study is to Investigate alternatives for Improving effluent wastewater quality for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) Reclamation Plant Number 1. Brine and other discharges with high total dissolved solids (TDS) content tributary to CSDOC's service area are the primary focus. Brine from existing or potential desalters and reclamation projects, if discharged to local sewers, would significantly increase the TDS concentrations of the influent and effluent wastewater of CSDOC treatment plants. The quality of the secondary effluent from CSDOC Reclamation Plant Number 1 is of concern because of on-going and potential uses of reclaimed wafer from this treatment plant by the Orange County Water District (OCWD), which diverts a portion of the secondary effluent from Plant Number 1 'd for further treatment in the Green Acres Project for irrigation and in Water Factory 21 for groundwater injection (Talbert Barrier Project). w EXISTING CSDOC CONVEYANCE AND TREATMENT SYSTEM Review of the existing and planned conveyance and treatment facilities indicated that CSDOC Is able to provide adequate treatment for the projected wastewater flow within its service area. If brine from the Upper Santa Ana River Basin or within CSDOC service area were to be segregated for disposal to Plant Number 2, a new brine Interceptor other than the SARI would be needed because of capacity limitations in most of the Influent interceptors. Existing diversion facilities for influent wastewater between the two treatment plants are limited to the 78- .. inch bypass pipeline on Ellis Avenue for Plant Number 1 to Plant Number 2 and the pump station/force main on Ellis Avenue for Plant Number 2 to Plant Number 1. The rated capacity of these diversion facilities are 98 mgd and 19 mgd, respectively. r WASTEWATER QUALITY DATA ANALYSIS All the influent Interceptors tributary to Plant Number 1 were sampled during this study. Results indicated a TDS range of 1050 - 1583 mg/L and a Nitrogen (TKN) range of 37-48 mg/L. A correlation between TDS and EC (electrical conductivity) was established using the data from _ 11 r the SARI and Talbert Interceptor. The ratio of TDS/EC was determined to be about 0.65 and this ratio was applied in later sampling results to determine the TDS values. Among the Plant Number 1 influent interceptors, the SARI was found to have the highest TDS concentrations. m Nitrogen and TDS concentrations in the Plant Number 1's influent and effluent were Identified to be the two main problems of concern. Possible explanations given for the recent Increase of effluent nitrogen concentrations include the recycle of Plant Number 1 fitter press filtrate/washwaters and the result of area wide water conservation efforts. The TDS concentrations in the secondary effluent from Plant Number 1 have increased from 1,000 mg/L to 1,200 mg/L over a 2-year period from 1990 to 1991. Explanations proposed for the Increase include water conservation, source water quality of Colorado River versus State Water Project, increased number of home water softeners and return of Water Factory 21 brine back to Plant Number 1. BRINEFLOW AND QUALITY ANALYSIS Existing and potential brine sources were identified and tabulated. The amount of brineflow tributary to Plant Number 1 was determined to be about 30 mgd (Including about 4 mgd of raw sewage flow in SARI). OCWD has proposed a dedicated brineline (Irvine Brineline) which would convey brine from several desalters and reclamation plants in Orange County directly to the ocean through the CSDOC Interplant ocean outfall. If brine were allowed to co-mingle with municipal sewage, the projected TDS and total nitrogen concentrations of SARI (immediately upstream of Plant Number 1) would be 1,840 mg/L and 46 mg/L, respectively. It SARI flow were to be treated at Plant Number 1, the projected combined influent TDS and total nitrogen concentrations would then be 1,584 mg/L and 42 mg/L, respectively. BRINE ROUTING ANALYSIS Five alternatives were considered for Improving the effluent quality of Plant Number 1 by segregating the brineflow from SARI or routing the entire SARI flow to Plant Number 2. The baseline alternative, which is also known as the wastewater desalination alternative, would require no action from CSDOC. OCWD would have to upgrade and expand its treatment plants e, to treat the effluent with higher TDS and nitrogen concentrations. The three new Interceptor alternatives would consider the construction of segregated brinelines (La Palma/Magnolia, Santa Ana River Parallel and Glassell/Grand) to convey brineflow to Plant Number 2, thus bypassing Plant Number 1. The interplant diversion alternative would continue the bypass of 12 r the entire SARI flow to Plant Number 2. Under this alternative, anew 40 mgd pump station and force main along Ellis Avenue would be needed to divert flow from the Knott Interceptor to Plant Number 1 in order to maintain a balanced flow to both treatment plants. .. Order•cf•magnitude estimates prepared for the five alternatives Indicated that the capital costs range from $8.1 million to$55 million. The present worth costs range from $14.4 million to$55 million. The interplant diversion alternative has the lowest capital cost of$8.1 million and lowest present worth cost of$14.4 million. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS The interplant diversion alternative is the recommended routing option because of its lower capital and present worth cost. Under this alternative, all brineflows tributary to Plant Number 1 except those to be handled by the proposed Irvine Brineline would be conveyed by the SARI and then diverted to Plant Number 2. It is also recommended that the filter press filtrate be diverted to Plant Number 2, that the Water Factory 21 brine be continued to discharge to the Plant Number 1 interplant ocean outfall, and that the Irvine Brineline be constructed. Source control strategies including sampling, quality goals and quantity limits are also suggested for Identification and controlling of existing and potential brineflow to CSDOC's service area. It is suggested that TDS and boron be included in the source control sampling r program because of their significance in reclaimed water applications. It is also suggested that the amount of brineflow that can be discharged into the CSDOC treatment system should be .. limited. In this case, the ammonia nitrogen concentration in the CSDOC combined ocean discharge is the limiting parameter. Projected heavy metal concentrations in the ocean s, discharge resulting from the projected brineflow should also be below the specified NPDES permit limits. r 1-3 er CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION PROJECT OVERVIEW ` This study investigates a potential management program for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) regarding brine and other discharges with high total dissolved solids -• (TDS) contents. Improving the wastewater quality of the effluent from CSDOC Reclamation Plant Number 1 is the main purpose of this study. Orange County Water District (DOWD), who is the co-sponsor of this study, is concerned about the effluent from CSDOC's Plant Number 1 _ because they treat the secondary effluent for subsequent groundwater injection for the Talbert Barrier (Water Factory 21) project and wastewater reuse for the Green Acres Project. As a part of this study, various potential sources of brine and other high TDS discharges will be r+ identified and the respective quantity and qualities of brineflows will be projected. Wastewater characteristics of the major trunklines to CSDOC's Plant Number 1 will be evaluated to Identify potential problems relating to wastewater qualities of the effluent. Several options to divert _ brineflows tributary to CSDOC Plant Number 1 to Plant Number 2 will be studied. System diversion options within the CSDOC wastewater conveyance system will also be Investigated. Capital and O&M costs associated with these options will be estimated. .. STUDY OBJECTIVES There are four major objectives for this study: 1) To review brine quantity and quality from the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) and other trunklines feeding into CSDOC Plant Number 1. 2) To project flow and quality of other potential brine sources from the upper Santa Ana Basin (conveyed by SARI) and other parts of Orange County. Brine producers include Industries, dairies, groundwater desalting projects, and wastewater reclamation projects both for irrigation or for groundwater recharge by spreading and injection. 21 m 3) To evaluate various flow routing strategies. Investigate and estimate costs of new regional brine interceptors. Explore potential system diversion options between Plant Number 1 and Plant Number 2 to balance hydraulic loading as well as to improve effluent quality of Plant Number 1. 4) To select the best strategy or combination of strategies regarding source control, flow e, routing, collection system and/or in-plant diversions. Recommendations would focus on minimizing the effects of increased brineflows on plant treatment processes, process equipment,Water Factory 21 effluent quality, and Green Acres Project effluent quality. d SCOPE-OF-WORK The scope-of-work to be completed under this contract is delineated below. There are six task areas that are included and will be described briefly: TASK 1 Existing Sewage Conveyance and Treatment System Evaluation m The current flow tributary to Plants Number 1 and 2 will be evaluated,with special emphasis on the flow in the SARI, the other trunklines feeding Into Plant Number 1, and the interplant trunkline for influent diversion from Plant Number 1 to Plant Number 2. Current and projected hydraulic capacities of the CSDOC trunklines will be tabulated and compared based on the 1989 CSDOC Master Plan. Describe briefly the current treatment and conveyance facilities of CSDOC including the influent from OCWD's Water Factory 21, which is located adjacent to CSDOC Plant Number 1. - Summarize the recommended improvements according to the CSDOC Master Plan regarding ® treatment and conveyance facilities. Evaluate the process performance of Plant Number 1 and Plant Number 2 with special emphasis on the effluent quality of Plant Number 1. .. Delineate in detail the current diversion procedures for all trunklines to Plants Number 1 and 2. Diversions would include upstream diversions of trunklines and in-plant bypass of trunklines from Plant Number 1 to Plant Number 2. 22 TASK 2 Wastewater Quality Assessment .., Summarize all available wastewater quality data from sampling results of CSDOC and OCWD with special emphasis on SARI and the other trunklines tributary to Plant Number 1. Coordinate .n upstream sampling of major trunklines to Identify potential quality problems in these trunk sewers. Evaluate trunkline wastewater quality using parameters such as TDS, total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), total nitrogen (TN), ammonia as nitrogen (NH3-N), and specific conductance (EC). Determine a correlation between EC and TDS of Plant Number 1 influent and effluent based on available sampling results. Identity problem areas including trunkline qualities and in- plant waste sidestream recycling which have been affecting the wastewater quality of the Plant Number 1 effluent. TASK 3 Brine Quantity and Quality Assessment Identity potential brine sources from and within the service area of CSDOC Including contribution from SARI. Brine producers may include potential Orange County and Upper ,., Santa Ana Basin desalting plants for wastewater reclamation and groundwater cleanup, OCWD's desalters in Orange County, industries, and dairies. Estimate quality and quantity of brineflow from all sources. Project quality and flow of SARI. Describe briefly the brine disposal solutions of identified brine sources such as the Arlington Desalter, and OCWD's existing and proposed desalters. Identity problem areas and delineate all assumptions. TASK 4 Routing Analysis Review the existing and recommended CSDOC sewage conveyance system for possible upstream re-routing of brine and high TDS flows. Identity and analyze the feasibility of constructing dedicated brine interceptors to segregate SARI brine from sewage flow. Describe -- briefly the proposed Irvine brineline to collect brine from all OCWD's existing and proposed desalters and convey the flow directly to the ocean using the CSDOC's Interplant ocean outfall. Determine the effect on the effluent quality of Plant Number 1 after implementation of the ., selected routing aflernative(s) including the resulting hydraulic impacts to both treatment plants. •+ Describe possible alternatives for re-routing Plant Number 1 waste sidestreams to Plant Number 2 instead of recycling them back to Plant Number 1. Brine and high TDS wastewaters from OCWD WF 21 and Green Acres treatment plant will also be considered for re-routing. Estimate the capital and O&M costs of all routing alternatives. 2-3 ee TASK 5 Recommendations Select and recommend the optimum routing option based on cost and other limiting factors. Recommend source control strategies that would monitor the existing and future brine dischargers to control the quality of the wastewater effluent. TASK 6 Documentation Report r Prepare a draft report summarizing findings of the study. Prepare a final report Incorporating the comments from CSDOC and OCWD staffs. 4tl TASK 7 Project Management and Meetings r Provide project management and interaction with CSDOC and OCWD throughout the preparation of the study. Attend monthly meetings with CSDOC and OCWD staffs and prepare ., meeting minutes. Make two presentations to the CSDOC/OCWD management boards in their monthly joint meeting. STUDY TEAM The project team includes members from Boyle, CSDOC and OCWD: Boyle Engineering Corporation ,r Project Director- Philip Stone Project Manager -William Everest Project Engineer-Julius Me Project Engineer- David Philips " County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Project Director-Tom Dawes, CSDOC Engineering •+ Project Advisor - Blake Anderson, CSDOC Technical Services Project Manager -Wendy Sevenandt, CSDOC Engineering Team Member - Susan Bradford,CSDOC Technical Services Team Member -Charles Nichols, CSDOC Technical Services Team Member -Chris Pelletia, CSDOC Source Control Team Member - Paul Mitchell, CSDOC Engineering ,.Y 2-4 .., Orange County Water District John Chautty Nereus Richardson Steve Conklin Jim Reilly ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For their assistance during the course of this study, we wish to express our appreciation to the following: 1) CSDOC Engineering, Operations and Technical Services Divisions, especially Blake Anderson, Director of Technical Services, Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering, Bob Ooten, Director of Operations, and Wendy Sevenandt, Project Manager and director of the Task Force; 2) CSDOC's Project Task Force members Susan Bradford, Charles Nichols, Chris m Pelletia, and Paul Mitchell; 3) Orange County Water District, who sponsored and provided numerous water quality information and advice from its staff, especially John Chaufty, Nick Richardson, Steve Conklin, and Jim Reilly; 4) Management and staff of several agencies who provided water quality, technical and institutional information, especially: Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority and Irvine Ranch Water District. .d .d 2-5 m CHAPTER 3 EXISTING CSDOC SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND TREATMENT SYSTEM r EXISTING TREATMENT AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEM General r The County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC) provide wastewater management ..� services for metropolitan Orange County and promote a balanced environmental protection program of water, air and land resources. CSDOC serves over 2 million people in a 439 square mile area which Includes 23 of Orange County's 29 cities. The CSDOC is comprised of 9 districts. Each is a separate public corporation headed by a representative from each city and sanitary district and a member from the Board of Supervisors. Each District owns and operates its own Interceptor sewers and ,.� pumping stations. Collectively the districts own more than 800 miles of subtrunk and trunk sewers, 33 pumping stations, 2 wastewater treatment plants and ocean disposal facilities. The treatment plants process more than 260 mgd of wastewater. Of this amount 20 percent is a result of industrial and commercial operations and 80 percent is from residential properties. Surface water and runoff are not allowed into the system and are collected and conveyed by a .+ separate storm drain system owned and operated by the Orange County Environmental Management Agency (OCEMA). Figure 3-1 shows a map of CSDOC's service area. r Reclamation Plant Number 1 d+ Treatment Plant Number 1, which is normally referred to as Reclamation Plant Number 1, is located in the City of Fountain Valley. It is fed by six influent Interceptors. The metering and r, diversion structure at Plant Number 1 is able to divert up to 100 mgd of influent to Plant Number 2. The Headworks for Plant Number 1 consists of four mechanically cleaned bar screens r followed by eight pumps. Wastewater passes through the screens and is pumped to grit chambers where gritty materials like sand and gravel are allowed to settle out. The screenings and grit are hauled by truck to a landfill. Following the pretreatment steps, wastewater flows to " primary sedimentation basins where organic solids are settled out. Solids are pumped to the solids processing tanks or digesters where they undergo anaerobic decomposition. Fifty r percent of the solid materials, called sludge, is converted to methane gas which is used to 3-1 LA HABRA r FILLLE TON , ' - V YORBA Y �I3J PLACENTIA LINDA .A J BUENA LA PARK PALMA J� CYPRE973 ,. ANAH IM g Y VILLA 9 'STA/NTON( PARK o LOS IALAMITOS . ORANGE / } GARDEN \ GROVE ESTMINSTER �^ •, , ..SANTA TUSTIN q ANA F `q. FOUNTAIN •. VALLEY p HUNTINGTON , BEACH i PACIFIC COSTA MESA IRV OCEAN m all COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY & ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT WASTEWATER QUALITY, TREATMENT AND DIVERSION STUDY 90 E CSDOC FIGURE E/7G//7EER//7G CORPORRT/O/7 1501 quail Street P.O. Box 3030 SERVICE AREA 3-1 Newport Beach, California 92658-9020 power engines and boilers at the treatment plant. The remaining sludge is dewatered to about 23 percent solid material. One hundred percent of the dewatered material is recycled for composting or used as a soil additive. After pretreatment, ferric chloride and anionic polymers are added to the wastewater to enhance the settling process during primary sedimentation. Approximately 65 percent of the solids in the wastewater are removed at this point and pumped to the digesters. Secondary treatment at Plant Number 1 Includes both trickling filter and activated sludge processes. Primary treated water is distributed to trickling filters and aeration basins where organic solids in the water are consumed by microorganisms. Trickling filter effluent also goes to aeration basins because the quality of the effluent does not meet the standards for Plant Number water system. Part of the effluent from the activated sludge plant is diverted for further treatment for reuse by OCWD and the remainder is discharged to the ocean. Sludge y from the trickling filter's settling basins is returned to the primary basins while the sludge from the activated sludge process is recycled or pumped to digesters for treatment. A portion of secondary treated water from the activated sludge process is conveyed to OCWD's Water Factory 21 for tertiary treatment prior to groundwater recharge. A portion is also .d delivered to OCWD's Green Acres Project (GAP) facilities for tertiary treatment prior to landscape irrigation. The balance Is conveyed by either of three interplant pipelines to the " outfall booster complex at Plant Number 2 where it is mixed with treated wastewater from Plant Number 2 and disposed of in the ocean. Figure 3-2 presents a process flow diagram of Reclamation Plant Number 1. Treatment Plant Number 2 Plant Number 2 is located in the City of Huntington Beach. It is fed by five Interceptor sewers. In addition, a diversion structure allows any of the six sewers tributary to Plant Number 1 to be diverted to Plant Number 2 to balance wastewater flows with the plants' capacities. Plant Number 2 headworks consists of five bar screens followed by five pumps. The two plants are operated in a similar manner except that not all wastewater at Plant Number 2 undergoes secondary treatment and Plant Number 2 has no trickling filters. Secondary effluent from Plant Number 1 and Plant Number 2 is combined with the remaining advanced primary treated effluent from Plant Number 2 prior to discharge to the ocean. There are two outfall booster stations which operate in parallel to pump effluent from both plants through a 120-inch outfall. The ten-foot diameter outfall extends four miles into the ocean with a one mile diffuser section 3-2 e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e a TO OCWD MR RECLAMATION CHLORINE TRICKUNG FILTER INRUEM BAR POLYMER ICKUNO EITLUENT DIVERSION SCREENS CRe FlLIFAS NR STRUCNRE CAM S /�'� AERARON INELUEM WASTEWATER g�,� C ARInE S CIARIFlERS BRINE jFRO FERRIC CHLORIDE III I�FlLL SLUDGE p SCREENINGS TO WAS BKK PRIMARY LANDFlLL RESINS DIGESTER UNDERFLOIN SKIMMINGS GAS TO ORNx ENGINES OAE INTERPVJlT PRIWM 'ANAEROBIC SEWER RECYCIF SWIXsGE DIGESTERS THICKENED PUMP STARON S-U FlE11a1E BELr / D106IED PRESSES FERROUS SWDGE CHLORIDE ELLS P AMMO 1 UMP STARON POLYMEP SWDCE PLANT NO. 1 REUSE SECONDARY EF m SOURCE: 1990 CSDOC Annual Report, Figure E.3 BOyLE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS FIGURE EnlGinEERm OF ORANGE COUNTY RECLAMATION PLANT NOA . C13RP0RHT/Or1 & ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 1501 quail Street P.O. Box 3030 WASTEWATER QUALITY , TREATMENT PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM 3-2 Newport Beach, California 92658-9020 AND DIVERSION STUDY V which Iles at a 200 foot depth. There are two other discharge points to be used only in the case of an emergency. One discharge to a 78-inch 7,200-foot-long outfall located off of the mouth of the Santa Ana River which discharges to the ocean. The other emergency discharge point Is overflow to the Santa Ana River,which can be used only if the first two discharge points cannot ,r be utilized and only after the wastes have received chlorination. Figure 3-3 presents a process flow diagram of Treatment Plant Number 2. V ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT TREATMENT PLANTS Green Acres Project ,r This project supplies reclaimed municipal wastewater to parks, greenbelts, nurseries, schoolyards, golf courses, and industrial sites within a five-mile radius of Water Factory 21. Phase I of the project has been operated since fall of 1991, and is capable of providing up to V 7.5 MG of water each day for those uses. A second phase expansion of the project could provide a combined 15 mgd or more of reclaimed water within the next five years. The Green Acres treatment plant Is located adjacent to Water Factory 21 and uses secondary effluent supplied by the CSDOC Reclamation Plant Number 1. The treatment processes include `+ coagulation, direct filtration and chlorination. Product water is stored on site in a reservoir prior to pumping for distribution. Water Factory 21 r This advanced wastewater treatment plant, in operation since 1976, is located adjacent to the CSDOC Reclamation Plant Number 1. The plant also uses secondary effluent from CSDOC's Plant Number 1 for further treatment to produce high quality water for groundwater injection. Facilities of Water Factory 21 include a 15 mgd Vestment plant that provides chemical clarification, recarbonation, multi-media filtration, carbon adsorption, and chlorination, and a 5 mgd reverse osmosis demineralization plant. Twenty-three multiple-point wells inject the finished water into the underground aquifers, creating a coastal barrier to prevent seawater .. intrusion. Until the past year, the treated water was required to be blended with deep well water prior to injection according to the discharge permit. Recently, OCWD obtained a revised permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board to inject unblended treated water that meets specific and more stringent water quality requirements. .e 3-3 ,r H 1 H H 1 E E 1 H 1 1 H E E E E H 1 E PUNT N0. I SECONDARY EFFLUENT 120' INTERPIANT SEWER MEAN LL CHLORINE UNE TO PI-ANT CHLORINE PRIMARY EFFLUENT FERRIC N0. I BAR CHLORIDE 1 SECONDARY OUTFAU SCREENS CRR FUEM BOOSTER C O%YCEN PUMP INFLUENTAERATION STATIONS WASTEWATER 5(MM�S POLYMER CLARIFIERS GRIT TO BKK SKIMMINGS LANDFILL RAS SCREENINGS TO WAS BKK PRIMARY LANDFILL BASINS PRIMARY EFFLUENT DIGESTER UNDERFLOW GAS TO ENGINES DAF PRIMARY ANAEROBIC DUN SLUDGE DIGESTERS THICKENED SLUDGE FERROUS CHLORIDE DIGESTED BELT SLUDGE PRESSES POLYMER FILTRATE RELYCLE PUMP STATION SLUDGE REUSE �w SOURCE; 1990 CSDOC Annual Report, Figure E.3 BOYLE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS EnGInEER/na OF ORANGE COUNTY TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 FIGURE IJ . CORPORRTIOn & ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 1501 Quail Street P.0_ Bo: 3030 PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM 3-3 Newport Beach, California 92658.9020 WASTEWATER QUALITY, TREATMENT AND DIVERSION STUDY SUMMARY OF MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS General CSDOC's waste management program is based on a 50 percent secondary treatment level. Although CSDOC's current NPDES permit for ocean discharge does not require full secondary treatment of the wastewater, future discharge requirements may be more restrictive. In order to plan for future discharge requirements, three treatment scenarios were developed. The preliminary preferred alternative is to proceed with planning based on current NPDES permit discharge concentration levels. This atemative was determined to be the most appropriate because of its balance between effects on natural resources and considerations to resource allocations. Treatment plant sites are master planned to allow the full secondary treatment alternative fl it is determined necessary at a later date. .y Regardless of the facility requirements for varying levels of secondary treatment, future facilities will still have to be sized for the increase in flow rates. Sewage flows are expected to increase from 260 mgd in 1990 to 399 mgd by 2020. This will require: 57 miles of new trunk sewers, r added treatment plant capacity and a new parallel 10-toot diameter ocean outfall. .d In addition to constructing new facilities for increased wastewater flow, CSDOC's plans for future management include: continued source control; expansion of water reclamation facilities; promotion of water conservation; and maximizing the recycling of water treatment by-products. Future Facility Needs Additional facilities required include: �^ Trunk Sewers - Among the future facilities recommended for construction, CSDOC's Master Plan identifies necessary sewer improvements. In addition to constructing new trunk sewers, r older facilities will need to be replaced or rehabilitated. Treatment Plants - By the end of the thirty year planning period, it is planned that the headworks at Plant Number 1 will provide total pumping capacity of 450 mgd plus a standby of 127 mgd, which would be capable of handling an average daily flow rate of 240 mgd. It is ^y anticipated that Plant Number 2 headworks will have sufficient capacity to convey flows throughout the planning period. 3-4 Reclamation Plant Number 1 has a capacity of 90 mgd plus 18 mgd standby with the completion of P1-33 primary sedimentation basin. Treatment Plant Number 2 has a rated capacity of 156 mgd plus 30 mgd standby. This totals 246 mgd plus 48 mgd standby. By the year 2020 it is projected that Plant Number 1 will need facilities to treat 219 mgd of wastewater and Plant Number 2, 180 mgd. After 2020, additional capacity of both plants would be increased until a capacity of 240 mgd is reached at each plant. Facility expansion is planned in increments generally between 30 and 60 mgd each, over the planning period, so that the rate of expansion matches growth rate. Diversion Facilities - Currently flows are diverted from Plant Number 1 to Plant Number 2 by a 78-inch pipeline which feeds a 96-inch Interplant Interceptor. With increased treatment capacity ,d at Plant Number 1 diverted flows will decrease until the year 2020. After 2020, diversion flows will increase with increased capacity in Plant Number 2, requiring a second 78-inch diversion line from the metering and diversion structure at Plant Number 1 to the 96-inch Interplant Interceptor and replaced Magnolia-Bushard Interceptor. Effluent Lines - There are three interplant effluent lines which run from Plant Number 1 adjacent to the Santa Ana River to the outfall Booster Station at Plant Number 2. The master plan has Identified the construction of a 120-inch line as a required facility once the capacity of the 66- and 84-inch effluent lines has been exceeded. c' Outfalls - With peak wet weather flows of 480 mgd, the capacity of the 120-inch ocean outfall is exceeded. This requires the use of the 78-inch outfall for relief. However, since the use of the 78-inch line is designated for emergency use only, this outfall is required to be modified to a 120-inch diameter and extended in length. Future Programs CSDOC's master plan also calls for the continuation of wastewater management programs including the following: ® Sludge Management- CSDOC will continue the development of reuse alternatives of sludge. _ Wastewater Reclamation - Currently CSDOC provides up to 15 mgd of wastewater to OCWD for wastewater reclamation. This supply will be increased in the future, due to planned expansions of WF 21 and Green Acres treatment plants. The current and future flows for these two projects may total 40 to 50 mgd. Also, studies have identified numerous potential upstream reclamation plant sites for reclaiming up to an additional 43 mgd for the purpose of groundwater recharge, 3-5 landscape irrigation and industrial uses. The study Identified the economic viability of constructing these plants in the near future. m Water Conservation -This item is important to reducing flows and potentially reducing the size .d of future treatment facilities. CSDOC will continue its role in promoting water conservation through cooperative efforts with local government agencies. .., Source Control - The principle behind source control is that it is easier to manage toxics and their impact on the environment before they enter the wastewater stream then afterwards when they are diluted. CSDOC will continue Its source control program by minimizing wastes through motivating industry to utilize substitute materials and processes which are less harmful to the environment. COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATORY AGENCY REQUIREMENTS General CSDOC treatment facilities are required to operate in accordance with the requirements of federal, state and local laws and regulations. Agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB), the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAOMD), and the California Department of Health Services (DHS) are governing the operation of the CSDOC treatment facilities through the issuing of permits and orders. The regulatory permit goals are established to protect the public -• health and preserve beneficial uses of the coastal waters along the Orange County shores and preserve air quality. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, issued to CSDOC by the CRWQCB, Santa Ana Region, outlines the effluent quality for ocean discharge from the treatment plants. Specific quantities or concentrations of chemical or biological constituents are included in the permit requirements. The following section will summarize the quality and — quantity of treated wastewater that is discharged to the ocean. Comparisons were made - - between NPDES requirements and the influent and effluent values to indicate CSDOC's treatment performance. 3{ r r r Compliance with NPDES Requirements r Since April 1, 1985, CSDOC has been operating under the Federal Clean Water Act, Section 301 (h) modified permit as stipulated In CRWOCB Santa Ana Region, Order Number 84-1, and the Final Decision Fact Sheet issued February 22, 1985 by the EPA Region IX. r This NPDES permit delineates the required quality of the effluent for ocean discharge. The discharge limits set forth in the permit are in accordance with all the provisions of the California Ocean Plan and the Federal Clean Water Act. Under the current permit, CSDOC Is to remove r 75 percent of the suspended solids and is limited to 189,000 pounds per day of biological oxygen demand (BOD) in the blended final effluent. A list of the regulated contaminants and their respective limits are tabulated in Table 3.1. The data in Table 3-1 show that all discharge limits for the ocean effluent have been met. Brine is usually characterized by hlgh TDS concentrations. Although TDS is not a regulated parameter in the NPDES permit, high TDS Influent will affect the performance and efficiency of the treatment processes, especially for Reclamation Plant Number 1 where part of the effluent Is r reclaimed for irrigation and groundwater Injection. r CSDOC has Instituted aggressive programs to monitor the quality of the ocean effluent. As one of the permit conditions, CSDOC is administering an ocean monitoring program which measures the conditions of the marine environment off Orange County's coast. Over the years, the results of the monitoring program demonstrate that CSDOC is successfully protecting the public health and the coastal waters of Orange County. V r r V V r 3-7 r TABLE 3-1 COMPARISON OF CSDOC NPDES REQUIREMENTS,ANNUALAVERAGE INFLUENT AND OCEAN EFFLUENT DISCHARGE VALUES, 1990-1991 NPDES NPDES CSDOC Combined Average ,�. 30-Day 7-Day NPDES Constkuent Average Average Maximum Influent Effluelu BOD mg/I 100 150 - 250 70 lb/day 189.000 284,000 - 163,000 Suspended Solids ,., mg/I 60 143 - 241 44 lb/day 121,000 271,000 - 96.000 Grease&Oil r mg/I 25 40 75 56 13.6 lb/day 47,000 76.000 - 29,700 Settleable Solids, ml/I 1.0 1.5 3.0 - 0.5 Toxicity,to 1.5 2.0 2.5 - .62 Turbidity, NTU 75 100 225 - 33 H 6t09 7.6 7.6 CSDOC Combined Effluent .e NPDES Influent 12-Month Constituent, mall 6-Month Median 12-Month Average Median Cadmium 0.02 0.0044 0.0012 Chromium 0.10 0.022 0.0065 Copper 0.30 0.154 0.044 Lead 0.10 0.014 0.0025 Mercury 0.001 0.0007 0.0002 Nickel 0.10 0.034 0.024 Silver 0.03 0.019 0.0075 Zinc 0.30 0.162 0.056 Cyanide 0.10 <0.02 <0.020 Arsenic 0.01 0.0024 0.002 _ Ammonla-N 30 23 24 Phenols (non-chlorinated) 0.50 <0.013 ND (chlorinated) 0.15 ND ND _ Alddn&Dleldrin 0.0003 ND ND Chlordane&Related 0,0003 ND ND DPT&Derivatives 0.00007 <0.00005 ND Endrin 0.0003 ND ND HCH 0.0006 0.00001 0.00001 PCBS 0.00045 ND ND Toxaphene 0.00105 ND ND Notes: ND = Non-detected. r -- = Not determined. Mass loading based on flow of 262 mgd. Source: CSOOC Annual Report, 1991. 3-8 CURRENT HYDRAULIC CONDITION OF RECLAMATION PLANT NUMBER 1, TREATMENT PLANT NUMBER 2 AND THEIR TRIBUTARY TRUNKS r Based on the 1991 Annual Report, the average wastewater flow treated at Plant Number 1 was .� 62 mgd and at Plant Number 2 was 217 mgd. Expansion of Plant Number 1 is due this year to treat an average flow of 90 mgd. The master plan also indicated that by the year 2020, each plant will need about 200 mgd capacity to treat the projected wastewater flows. As described in a previous section of this chapter, Reclamation Plant Number 1 is fed by six ,r major Influent Interceptors. It's service area is generally to the east of Euclid Avenue and includes five sanitation districts: 1, 2, 7, 13 and 14. Plant Number 1 also receives sewage and industrial brine conveyed through the Santa Ana River Interceptor from the Upper Santa Ana River Basin. Normally, average flow to Plant Number 1 accounts for more than half of the total flow to the CSDOC treatment system. Part of the flow tributary to Plant Number 1 is currently w being diverted to Plant Number 2 through the 78-Inch pipeline on Ellis Avenue to the Interplant Interceptor along Brookhurst Avenue. All influent Interceptors to Plant Number 1 converge at the Metering and Diversion structure near the main entrance of the plant. Table 3-2 lists the -- size, rated capacity and current flow in the interceptors. In the 1989 Master Plan, a parallel to ,r the Euclid Interceptor was recommended to Increase Its capacity. Figure 34 shows a flow schematic of the CSDOC joint treatment plant. "r TABLE 3-2 RECLAMATION PLANT NUMBER 1 INFLUENT INTERCEPTORS Rated0) Current(2) Pipe Size Pipe Size Capacity Flow Trunk Sewer Upstream of Plant to M&D Imodl fmadl Baker Gisler(3) 90" 78" 107 10.0 Sunflower 84" 84" 81 23 Talbert 48" 48" 25 19.6 Newhope-Placentia 51" 64" 48 28.2 Santa Ana River 84" 84" 186 33.3 Euclid 42" 42" 25 11.4 Total 125.5 (1) Based on d/D = 0.92 and Manning's n= 0.013. (2) Average of July and August, 1991. (3) Replaces the Airbase Trunk. 3-9 84" SANTA ANA RIVER 48" TALBERT 51" NEWHOPE- 7B' AIR BASE PLACENTIA 42" EUCLID 84" SUNFLOWER ���,��"•.,, 84" INTERPLA OO p ol000 � � i 78" DIVERSION LINE r94, f m 1 PLANT N0. 1 3Y ELLIS AVE. FORCE MAIN 96" INTERPLANT INTERCEPTOR I� ELLIS AVENUE ak ral PUMP STATION 5C MAGNOLIA - BUSHARD TRUNK 78" MILLER - HOLDER TRUNK 1989 CSDOC MASTER PLAN, Volume 2, Part 1, Figure 3-2. fm BOWLE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANG, Er7G1r7EER1r7G & ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTF COF J=0JgJ 7T10r7 1501 Quail Street P.Q. sox 3030 WASTEWATER QUALITY, TREATMENT Newport Beach, California 92658-9020 AND DIVERSION STUDY NO SCALE T - 66' INTERPLANT 120' INTERPLANT 427 DISTRICTS 5 @ 6 ] T4vrR � RIVCR 1ffi' - 120' OUTFALL 76' OUTFALL k3 r ¢po 00e 0 2 0 � �= ~ yo© o° DOO - ©© o BE] . e`b0 \ / PLANT NO. 2 Be COAST TRUNK SEWER : COUNTY FIGURE ICT CSDOC JOINT TREATMENT PLANT FLOW SCHEMATIC 3-4 V Treatment Plant Number 2 in Huntington Beach is fed by five major influent intercepters. Its service area is generally to the west of Euclid Avenue and south of Plant Number 1 and includes four sanitation districts: 3, 5, 6, and 11. Note that Districts 5 and 6 serving the cities of Costa Mesa and Newport Beach convey sewage to Plant Number 2 by pumping. The Interplant .e Interceptor along Brookhurst Avenue conveys flow from the Knott Interceptor and the by- passed flow from Plant Number 1 to Plant Number 2. Table 3-3 lists the size, rated capacity and current flow in the interceptors. It should be clarified that the Interplant Interceptor on Brookhurst Avenue is different from the two interplant ocean outfalls along the Santa Ana River on the east side of Plant Number 1. The latter pipelines convey primary or secondary treated .. wastewater to Plant Number 2 ocean ouffall booster pump station. Together with the effluent from Plant Number 2, the combined effluent is discharged to the ocean through a 120-inch ocean outfall pipeline. In the 1989 Master Plan, the Bushard Interceptor, which connects to the Magnolia Interceptor, is recommended for replacement due to aging and to increase its r, capacity. TABLE 3-3 TREATMENT PLANT NUMBER 2 INFLUENT INTERCEPTORS Pipe Size Ratednl Current(2) Upstream of Metering Capacity Flow ,r Trunk Sewer Structure (mod) (mad) - Coast 84' 56 6 Miller-Holder 78' 63 19.3 d Magnolia-Bushard 54' 35 11 Knott (Interplant) 96' 131 65.9 Districts 5&6 42' 21 13 V Total 115.2 Based on d/D = 0.92 and Manning's n= 0.013. (2) Average of July and August, 1991. CURRENT ROUTING AND SEWERAGE DIVERSIONS Upstream Diversion .7 Reclamation Plant Number 1 and Treatment Plant Number 2 have two distinct sewage -- conveyance systems. Diversion between the two systems is possible at one upstream location. The Orangethorpe Trunk in Fullerton, which connects the Euclid Interceptor and the 3.10 Magnolia-Bushard Interceptor, can be used to divert flow from Plant Number 1 tributary area to Plant Number 2 tributary area. After the completion of the 1989 Master Plan hydraulic analysis, the diversion was discontinued to avoid overloading the aging Magnolia-Bushard Interceptor which is due to be replaced in the near future. Within each plant's service area, sewerage diversions are necessary to avoid overloading certain trunklines. Also, as part of the contingency plan, diversion between trunks will help to .. minimize public health hazards due to blockage or damage in trunks. Detailed diversion flow control locations can be found in the 1989 Master Plan. For example, the diversion between the Santa Ana Trunk (Talbert) and the Sunflower Interceptor is necessary to relieve the capacity in the Santa Ana Trunk and diversion is possible at two of their tributary trunks: the lower Main a, Street-Broadway trunks and the Haiti Street trunk. For the Plant Number 2 system, the diversion between the Magnolia-Purchase trunk and the Knott Interceptor at the intersection of Boise Avenue and Magnolia Street is necessary to avoid overloading the Magnolia-Bushard. One major part of this study is to identify possible upstream diversions and routings that can convey about 30 mgd of brine from the Upper Santa Ana River Basin to Treatment Plant Number 2. Boyle has performed preliminary analysis by looking at the rated rapacity and projected flow in all the major trunks feeding Plants Number 1 and 2. Results of the analysis indicate that it is not possible to convey 30 mgd of brine through either system without constructing a new brine interceptor. Table 3-4 lists the major trunklines and their rated capacity and projected flow according to the 1989 Master Plan hydraulic analysis. The data in Table 3-4 indicate that there is not enough excess capacity in any trunklines to allow an additional 30 mgd of flow. In fact,the projected total flow in some trunklines exceeds their rated capacities. Excess flows to these trunklines, if they develop, would be diverted or other improvements would be required. r 3-11 .r YI .y TABLE 3-4 COMPARISON OF RATED CAPACITY AND PROJECTED TOTAL FLOW IN INFLUENT INTERCEPTORS Rated Projected Capacity Capacity Total Flow Improvement Trunk Sewer m d 1 (mad) a1 Recommendednt .. Plant Number 1 Euclid 25 20.5 Yes Newhope-Placentia 48 85.9 Yes r SARI 186 137.4 — Sunflower 81 85.0 Yes Talbert 25 25.6 — Baker-Gisler 107 87.9 — Plant Number 2 Coast 56 18.2 — Miller-Holder 63 64.4 — Magnota-Bushard 35 30.7 Yes Knott(Interplant) 131 134.7 — r Districts 5&6 21 11.6 — (1) Based on d/D = 0.92, Manning's n - 0.013. (2) 1989 Master Plan, Boyle's hydraulic analysis based on existing and planned land uses. Excess flows would be diverted or capacity Improvements would be required. (a) 1989 Master Plan recommended. r Plant Number 1 and Plant Number 2 Diversion .r Presently, diversion between each plant's influent flow is possible at two locations using two separate pipelines. The Influent flows from the Santa Ana River Interceptor and the Sunflower Interceptor which are tributary to Plant Number 1 are currently being diverted to Plant Number 2 through the 78-inch bypass trunk along Ellis Avenue to the Interplant Interceptor on Brookhurst Street. This bypass pipeline has a rated capacity of about 98 mgd. The Master Plan has d+ identified the construction of a second 78-inch diversion line paralleling the existing bypass pipeline to provide capacity for potential Increase of diverted flows in the future. The Diversion is controlled at the Metering and Diversion structure at Plant Number 1. During 1991, an average flow of about 70 mgd was diverted. Upon the completion of the Plant Number 1 expansion this year, the Sunflower flow which averages about 20 to 25 mgd will not be diverted to Plant Number 2. 3-12 .. CSDOC reports that diversion of influent flow from Plant Number 2 to Plant Number 1 occurs every morning to maintain minimum flow to Plant Number 1. A pump station at the intersection of Ellis Avenue and Bushard Street pumps raw sewage from the Magnolia-Bushard Trunk to the Plant Number 1 Metering &Diversion structure through a 33-Inch Techite-lined force main along Ellis Avenue. It is reported that an average of about 1.5 million gallons is diverted everyday. One option to control the effluent quality of Plant Number 1, which will be described in detail In .. later paragraphs, is the construction of a new bypass force main which will pump up to 40 mgd of raw sewage from trunks tributary to Plant Number 2 to Plant Number 1. The purpose of this diversion would be to replace the Santa Ana River Interceptor Flow which is tributary to Plant Number 1 so that CSDOC could continue to divert its flow to Plant Number 2 while still maintaining a balanced flow to both treatment plants. Figure 3-5 illustrates a schematic of the potential flow diversions between the two treatment plants. Wastewater quality information presented later indicates that SARI's flow has the highest current and projected TDS values. r r r r 3-13 Sewage Flow 480 mgd ( Ultimate ) (1/3) (2/3) I60 Ingd 320 mgd Treatment SARI Flow Reclamation Plant Number 2 go Plant Number 1 240 mgd 120 mgd 240 mgd I I W I Potential L——————- Diversion -——————J 40 mgd COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS BOS OF ORANGE COUNTY Flow Schematic of Interplant FIGURE El7GirlEER//7G/7 . CORPORRT/O!7 & ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Quail Diversion 3-5 New l Street P.O. Box 658- WASTEWATER QUALITY TREATMENT Newport Beach, Cal!lornla 92858-9029 , AND DIVERSION STUDY CHAPTER 4 WASTEWATER QUALITY DATA ANALYSIS " During the course of the study, wastewater quality information was obtained from past sampling results, from published reports and from special sampling. Boyle coordinated with CSDOC to test all influent trunklines tributary to Plant Number 1 to assess the quality of the influent sewers. Existing and projected brine quality will be discussed in the next chapter. r As part of the feasibility study to identify the potential location of new, upstream wastewater reclamation plants, CSDOC has several on-going programs to sample the upstream sewer r trunks to assess the quality of the raw sewage in the sewers. Attempts were also made to correlate the electrical conductivity (EC) and total dissolved solids (TDS) content of the influent raw sewage. Special samplings at two of the Plant Number 1 influent interceptors were performed to assess the TDS/EC ratio. This ratio is used in later sampling analyses to determine the TDS levels of various trunk sewers, since EC is a very rapid test. This chapter presents a summary of all the wastewater quality information. UPSTREAM SEWERS SAMPLING RESULTS Two distinct upstream samplings of the sewers were completed in September and October of d 1991. Samplings called Carbon Canyon and Plant Number 3 were performed as part of the planning process to locate the potential location of another proposed wastewater reclamation plant. Wastewater quality parameters such as TDS, total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) and total `y suspended solids (TSS) were tested to assess the general quality of the flow in the sewers. Figure 4-1 presents a location map of the sampling sites. Potential locations for the proposed - wastewater reclamation plant are also shown in the figure. Table 4.1 lists the result of the samplings. 4-1 m RIAL RELIEF INT RCEP OR ST IMPERIA LEGEND - - - IGHWAY TRU I -' -- — •SAMPLING LOCATION _ i • POTENTIAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION PLANT LOCATION 9Ng At 0Q� - - I� ----- --__-- RT SIA B ULLERTON cm Z Y a1flPq,t ..... .tom.. AA LI HI EL F �..�.iy... T 3AN ET O FE E �ORA GETH RPE TRUNK LL 1 T POTENTIAL CRESCENT Ali Ad BASIN WWRIP i TDS = 1740 I i ! TKN - 36 TDS = 1362 ( g/L1 m TKN = 40 z ;-- (mg/L) W.._.._ _..__... = TDS = 1187 j TKN = 39 cc 3 -- - —'W (mg/L) ! O = —•i i. r I - ? c B0WLE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGI E/7G1r1EER//70 & ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTR C0RP0RRT/0/7 1501 Quail Street O.O. Box 3030 WASTEWATER QUALITY, TREATMEN Newport Beach, California 92658-9020 AND DIVERSION STUDY �u� ........... / 1 1 .............. yJ._. .._.. _.._.._. i Lu v W _.._ P �2 TDS = 1625 Ey . / TKN = 108'VORRA (mg/L) tTDS = 1491 TDS = 1209 - °$ TKN = 39 TKN = 33 Y (mg/L) .. (mg/L) ; IL aiN - SS A ATWOb' )S = 925 TDS . 1557 x CN = 16 upl I Z TKN = 13 '._..x _-.._. mg/L) _'. 'O) - `u8'SP O (mg/L) INTERCEPTOR y TDS = 1572 c Q�dF'Q C TKN = 50 SANjA� _ a POTENTIAL POTENTIAL FOREBAY WWRP LA PALMA WWRP "'� ''•.r i 5 SUB- Ru :O o .o o COUNTY FIGURE CT UPSTREAM TRUNK r SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND RESULTS 4-1 r TABLE 4-1 UPSTREAM SEWERS SAMPLING RESULTSII) r Sampling Sampling TKN (mc/I) TSS (ma/I) TDS (mg/Il Location Data(2) Average l ange Average -Flange Average Range r Carbon Can von Miller/La Palma 09/91 50 17.66 154 79-206 1572 1350.1800 Miller/Miraloma 09/91 13 7-16 117 76-216 1557 1280-1800 Rose/Palm 09/91 33 30-37 165 134-214 1209 1000-1600 Kraemer/ Yorba Linda 09/91 39 3045 188 130-276 1491 1120-2000 Yorba Linda Pump Station 09/91 108 75-154 241 168-364 1626 1400-1800 r Plant 3 Magnolia/ La Palma 10/91 36 34-38 -- — 1740 1440-2300 Euclid/West 10/91 39 37-43 — — 1187 820-1770 Euclid/East 10/91 41 3845 — — 1362 996-2020 State College/ Orangethorps 10/91 16 11-20 — — 925 772-1430 r 11l Sampling by CSDOC. r (2) Samples are composite of samples taken over a 24-hour period. r The data in Table 4.1 show that the TDS levels of the sewage samples taken at upstream sewers are relatively high. The average TDS values of the Carbon Canyon sampling range from 1209 mg/L to 1626 mg/L which is considerably higher than 1170 mg/L, the 1991 average TDS r value of the secondary affluent of Plant Number 1. As indicated in Figure 4-1, the Carbon Canyon trunk and its tributaries converge to the SARI. These high TDS flows together with other high TDS flows in the SARI from the Upper Santa Ana Basin would make the SARI the saltiest trunk in the Plant Number 1 system. Subsequent samplings from the Plant Number 1 r Metering & Diversion structure of all the influent interceptors have confirmed that SARI is the trunk with the highest TDS values. The other set of upstream sampling also shows elevated levels of TDS, especially at the Magnolia/La Palma location. This set of sampling is on trunks tributary to Plant Number 2. The significance of these samplings could be the costs of the potential wastewater reclamation plant. With such high TDS contents in the influent, the capital and operation costs of the plant would be high to produce reclaimed water that is suitable for either irrigation or groundwater r 4-2 r r ' injection. Conventional wastewater reclamation plants are unable to produce reclaimed water with TDS level significantly lower than the influent water. Advanced treatment processes such r as reverse osmosis, nanofiltration or electrodlalysis reversal would need to be utilized to reduce the TDS level In the reclaimed water. r TDS/EC CORRELATION OF PLANT NUMBER 1 INFLUENT AND EFFLUENT r Special arrangement were made in November of 1991 with the CSDOC laboratory to sample r and test two influent interceptors of the Plant Number 1 system. Samples were taken at immediate upstream locations of the Metering &Diversion structure over a 24-hour period. The data present in Table 4.2 are results of the composite samples. TDS/EC ratios were calculated r for each day and an average value was determined over the 8-day sampling period. A value of 0.65 for the TDS/EC ratio was obtained for both the SARI and Talbert trunk. The determined r ratio is used in later sampling to determine the TDS values when only EC was measured in the samples. TABLE 4-2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE TDS/EC CORRELATIONM r Sampling Santa Ana River Interceptor Talbert Trunk Date l TDS EC TDS/EC TDS EC TDS/EC r 11/20/91 1269 2200 0.58 1031 1567 0.66 11/21/91 1300 2280 0.67 999 1617 0.62 r 11/22/91 1735 2400 0.72 990 1567 0.63 11/23/91 1752 2433 0.72 1156 1783 0.65 11/24/91 1287 2100 0.61 1019 1500 0.68 11/25/91 1784 2744 0.65 990 1517 0.65 r 11/26/91 1517 2267 0.67 1139 1717 0.66 11/27/91 2021 2833 0.71 1164 1800 0.65 Average 1583 2407 0.65 1061 1634 0.65 r (1) Results of composite of samples taken over a 24-hour period. r (2) Sampling at Immediate upstream of M&D structure, Plant 1. Information obtained from OCWD for the TDS and EC values of the WF 21 influent (0-1) was also used to develop a correlation of TDS/EC. Note that WF 21 is taking the secondary effluent r from the activated sludge treatment Vain of Plant Number 1. Table 4-3 lists the 2-year values of TDS and EC of the WF 21 influent O-1. An average value of the ratio was determined each r 4-3 r r r month and the overall average value of the TDS/EC ratio was calculated to be 0.59 over a 2- year period. Figure 4-2 shows plots of TDS, EC and the TDS/EC ratio of WF 21 influent Q-1. r TABLE 4-3 OCWD WATER FACTORY 21 INFLUENT 0-1(1) TDS/EC CORRELATION TDS(2) Conductivity, EC(3) Date (mg/1) (µmho/cm) TDS/EC Ratio 01/90 1033 1763 0.58 02/90 1019 1714 0.59 03/91) 982 1730 0.57 04/90 1003 1757 0.57 05/90 1024 1830 0.56 06/90 1033 1748 0.59 07/90 953 1582 0.60 08/90 1050 1589 0.66 09/90 1120 1732 0.64 10/90 1089 1732 0.62 11/90 1066 1768 0.60 r 12/90 1200 1798 0.67 01/91 1100 1909 0.58 02/91 1177 2051 0.57 ,r 03/91 1100 2074 0.63 04/91 1220 2142 0.57 05/91 1170 2122 0.55 06/91 1161) 2037 0.57 r 07/91 — — — 08/91 1145 2028 0.66 09/91 1130 1989 0.57 10/91 1213 2022 0.60 r 11/91 1260 2100 0.60 12/91 1238 2063 0.60 Average 1108 1882 0.59 r (1) Influent to OCWD treatment train for groundwater injection. 'tl (2) Average of daily grab samples. (3) Average of hourly readings on continuous EC chart SAMPLING RESULTS FOR PLANT NUMBER 1 INFLUENT INTERCEPTORS CSDOC had completed a thorough sampling of the influent interceptors to both Plants Number 4-4 r Figure 4-2 TDS & CONDUCTIVITY vs TIME WATER FACTORY 21 INFLUENT 2400 2200 T 2000 g 1800 8 1600 E 1400 C 1200 1000 800 66789101112123466789101112123466788101112 89 90 1 91 MONTH/YEAR TOSECTIWCHT 0.8 0.7 R A T 0.6 I O 0.64 0. 6878910111212346878910111212346878910t112 69 90 1 91 MONTH/YEAR nwTio.cnT r I and 2 from January 1985 to February 1986. Wastewater samples were analyzed for their mineral contents, physical characteristics and several heavy metal concentrations. Values for — conductivity and ammonia are listed in Table 4-4. The TDS values are calculated by applying an assumed TDS/EC ratio of 0.65. r During the course of this study, Boyle coordinated with CSDOC to sample and test the Plant Number 1 influent Interceptors at two separate dates. Sampling and testing were performed in `+ November 20 to 27 of 1991 and January 13 to 21 of 1992, respectively. All testing was performed by the CSDOC laboratory. Average values and ranges of the results are listed in r Table 4-4. Note that the TDS values of the latest sampling are calculated using the 0.65 TDS/EC ratio. TABLE 4-4 PLANT NUMBER 1 INTERCEPTORS SAMPLING Sampling EC (µmho/cm) TKN (ma/I) TDS (mg/I) Sewer Trunk Date Average RRan a Average Range Average Ran e Set 1(1) SARI 85-86 2656 17004500 45.3 26-81 [1726] — r Talbert 85-86 1517 1200-2200 22.2 17-28 1986] — Euclid 85-86 1614 600-2100 20.1 17-24 [1049] — Newhope 85-86 1955 1600-2500 20.3 17-24 [1271] — Sunflower 85-86 2298 1500-3800 21.8 15-31 [1494] — r Alrbase 85-86 1159 600-2200 34.5 27-57 [753 — Set 2(2) ,r SARI 11/91 2407 2100-2833 — — 1583(4 1269.2021 Talbert 11/91 1634 1500-1800 — — 1061 990-1164 S (3) r SARI 01/92 2113 1600-2400 37 3242 [1373] (5) Talbert 01/92 1614 1500-1800 44 35-52 [1050] Euclid 01/92 1837 1700-2000 37 3446 [1194 r Newhope 01/92 2042 1700-2200 39 3643 [1327; Sunflower 01/92 1929 1400-2400 48 36-56 [12541 Alrbase 01/92 1900 1700-2000 37 3442 [1235] r (1) Sampling period,01/85 to 02/86. (2) Sampling period, 11/20/91 toll/27/91. (3) Sampling pperiod.01/13/92to01/21/92. (4) Arlington Desalter on line. (1) Arlington Desalter off line. [ J Computed TDS values by applying TDS/EC ratio of 0.65. r r 4-5 r The data in Table 4-4 show that the TDS concentrations of most of the influent interceptors have Increased since the last sampling period. Possible reasons for the TDS increase are discussed In details in the next section. However, the SARI TDS concentrations have decreased from values of 1726 mg/L to 1373 mg/L. There might be two possible reasons for the decrease: 1) the Arlington Desalter, which contributes about 1 mgd of brine with TDS concentrations of 5,000 mg/L,was not operating at the time of the last sampling. The TDS would be about 1,600 mg/L If the brine from Arlington were in SARI. This estimate was confirmed by an earlier sampling in November of 1991. The SARI TDS concentration at that time was found to be 1,583 mg/L when the Arlington Desalter was running; 2) the flow of municipal sewage in the lower reach of SARI was lower in 1985.1986 than in 1991-1992. Municipal flow would dilute the brineflows with high TDS contents from the upper SARI reaches. DISCUSSION OF WASTEWATER QUALITY PROBLEMS One of the major purposes of this study is to assess the potential water quality problems of r, Plant Number 1 effluent that would affect the quality of the reclaimed water produced from Water Factory 21 and Green Acres Project. As mentioned earlier, OCWD is taking the d secondary activated sludge effluent from Plant Number 1 for further treatment to produce reclaimed water. Two potential problems have been identified: the nitrogen and TDS concentrations of Plant Number 1 influent and effluent. r Nitrogen Concentrations in Plants Number 1 and 2 Influent Table 4-5 lists the TKN and Ammonia-N (NH3-N) concentrations in the Influent and effluent wastewater of Plants Number 1 and 2. The values of TKN and NH3-N in the influent for both Plants Number 1 and 2 have increased slightly from 1990 to 1991. The same Increasing trend can be seen in the activated sludge effluent of Plant Number 1. Plant Number 2 TKN and NH3- N in the activated sludge effluent did not show any noticeable Increase, possibly because of the oxygenated process employed which is able to remove ammonia by nitrification. Plant Number 1 employs air activated sludge process which typically does not remove any NH3-N unless sufficient detention time is provided in the aeration basins. .d .d r 4-6 es H l I l H [ l H ( [ ( [ l [ I H ( ( I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY& ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Wastewater Quality,Treatment and Diversion Study Table 4-5 Summary of Water Quality Information-CSDOC Nitrogen C. I I)... TKN, mg/L NM3-N, RDA .............................................................. ................................................................... Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 1 Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 1 Date ------------------------------ ------------------ Filter Press ------------------------------ ------------._ -------- Filter Press Inf. T.F. Eff. A.S. Eff. Inf. A.S. Eff. Filtrate Inf. T.F. Eff. A.S. Eff. Inf. A.S. Eff. Filtrate ......... .............................. .................. ............ .............................. ....................... ............ Jul-88 36 33 14 36 24 19 29 12 25 23 Aug-88 30 40 14 41 28 20 39 13 26 25 Sep-as 36 30 22 34 22 18 28 16 23 21 Oct-as 35 37 27 40 26 22 33 21 26 22 Nov-88 31 --- 19 40 30 22 39 24 26 23 Dec-all 32 42 24 38 28 21 31 20 26 23 Jan-89 38 48 24 38 30 24 37 20 25 23 Feb-89 36 42 20 37 30 21 39 16 26 26 Mar-89 36 50 6.8 36 29 20 31 6.7 25 25 Apr-89 34 24 3.2 30 35 20 21 1 25 24 May-89 34 48 13 40 26 21 26 6.8 24 22 Jun-89 34 32 21 39 25 20 30 19 25 21 Jul-89 32 44 16 42 26 20 30 16 26 22 Aug-89 32 30 16 42 21 19 26 13 23 20 Sep-89 34 55 21 35 22 17 24 14 22 20 Oct-89 29 30 19 36 22 19 27 13 23 20 Nov-89 30 34 17 33 21 21 30 16 23 20 Dec-89 29 58 21 36 27 21 41 18 22 20 Jan-90 33 45 22 38 25 22 36 20 24 20 Feb-90 27 40 22 36 24 21 39 20 22 20 Her-90 26 42 23 34 24 20 35 20 22 21 Apr-90 28 42 26 38 26 19 36 24 24 22 May-90 28 33 26 36 24 20 28 23 23 20 Jun-90 34 32 20 36 24 19 30 18 21 19 Jul-90 33 48 /6 36 22 18 37 14 21 18 Aug-90 28 37 16 36 25 19 29 12 22 19 Sep-90 31 28 22 38 26 19 23 18 24 Inf. 21 Oct-90 32 31 21 38 24 19 26 18 22 (4) 20 Nov-90 32 40 23 38 25 19 33 18 23 22.9 19 Dec-90 34 36 26 38 26 20 30 22 22 22.4 20 Jon-91 38 48 27 40 26 20 34 22 23 22.9 20 Feb-91 36 38 26 41 25 (2) 22 31 20 23 23.3 21 (3) Mar-91 37 37 26 43 26 430 22 24 20 24 23.7 21 390 Apr-91 38 26 28 42 26 430 22 19 22 24 24.4 20 390 may-91 36 26 24 40 24 22 18 23 24 24.2 21 Jun-91 37 26 26 40 26 24 19 24 24 24.1 21 ........................................................................ ................................................................... Sources: (1) Anuual Report. 1989, 1990 8 1991. COX Updated: 3-17-92 (2) Range of Results for Mar - Apr 91. COX agcsdmn (3) Average of Results for Mar - Apr 91. COX (4) Internal memo, Greg Fannon to Bob Osten, July 18, 1991. COX One possible explanation for the increase in influent NH3-N concentrations was due to water conservation in Orange County. A memo, dated July 18, 1991 from Greg Pamson to Bob Ooten (Reference), revealed that CSDOC has been monitoring the effect of water conservation measures on influent concentrations of NH3-N. The memo reported a 6.8%decrease in influent flow and a 6.6% increase in NH3-N concentrations of the Plant Number 2 Influent from the last quarter of 1990 to the first quarter of 1991. CSDOC is aware of the recent nitrogen increase and r is considering partial nitrification to decrease the nitrogen in the effluent. The current NPDES permit limits the NH3-N concentration of the ocean effluent discharge to 30 mg/L. Nitrogen Problem in the Plant Number 1 Filter Press Filtrate Another related problem for nutrient concentrations in Plant Number 1 effluent is the recycling of the filter press filtrate in the Plant Number 1 treatment system. It is reported that the filtrate has been recycled back to the distribution structure feeding the secondary clarifiers. This could d cause an increase in nitrogen concentrations in the secondary effluent. Boyle coordinated with CSDOC operation division to investigate the quality of the filtrate and Its possible effect on the ,m secondary effluent. A memo, dated October 15, 1991 from Susan Bradford to Blake Anderson (Reference), reported the flow and mass loading of the filtrate together with some washwater m which is being recycled back to Plant Number 1. The combined waste sidestream has a TKN mass loading of 2,900 lb/day and ammonia mass loading of 2,640 lb/day. Preliminary calculation by Boyle, based on an average flow of 50 mgd to Plant Number 1. shows that the waste sidestreams recycling could cause a 6 mg/L Increase in ammonia or a 7 mg/L increase in TKN concentrations in the secondary effluent. A possible solution to this problem is to re-route the filtrate and other waste sidestreams to Plant Number 2. There had been opposition from the EPA that the routing of the filtrate to Plant Number 2 influent would be a concern regarding influent sampling. The major concern is the samples that are required to be taken at Plant Number 2 headwork would not be representative of the raw influent sewage from the plant's service area. CSDOC is negotiating with the EPA and the CRWOCB to allow re-routing of the sidestreams. Preliminary responses are positive from both agencies. m m 47 r TDS Problem In the Influent and Effluent of Plant Number 1 r TDS was one of the parameters tested in the recent sampling of the Plant Number 1 Influent Interceptors. TDS values were also calculated for the 1985-1986 sampling based on the r established TDS/EC ratio of 0.65. As Indicated in Table 4-4, a slight increase in TDS concentrations is noticed in almost all of the influent interceptors except the SARI and the Sunflower Interceptor. Possible explanations were given for the decrease in SARI's TDS r concentrations. No explanation could be found for the decrease in TDS values for the Sunflower Interceptor except for better source control from the industrial discharges. In Table 4-3, the TDS concentrations of the Water Factory 21 0-1 influent were listed. This r Influent stream is part of the secondary effluent stream from the activated sludge treatment train of Plant Number 1. There has been steady increase of TDS concentrations from 1,000 mg/L to about 1,200 mg/L over a 2-year period. OCWD reported that the TDS concentration goal of its r Green Acres Project influent is set at 1,050 mg/L. Presently, OCWD blends the effluent from Green Acres treatment plant with deep well water to lower the TDS values before distribution. Source Water Supplies r The relatively high TDS concentrations in the reclaimed water for the Green Acres Project could also pose potential problems for its application as irrigation water. As described briefly in the original scope-of-work, high TDS Irrigation water could decrease the number of plant species the water can be used on and shorten the application period of such irrigation projects. The r relatively high concentrations of TDS in the wastewater effluent of Plant Number 1 is due primarily to the higher TDS levels in the source water supply. There have been Important source water TDS changes occurring, primarily in the past ten years. Firstly, the Colorado " River, which is the major imported supply, had a TDS level of about 700 mg/I throughout the - 1970's. In the exceedingly wet period of 1983 (Lake Mead spilled for the first time in many, r many years) the Colorado River began a trend downward to TDS levels of 520 mg/I in 1985- 1988. Since that time, as a sustained drought period has progressed, there has been a gradual climb; at the end of 1991 the Colorado River was at 650 mg/I and salt levels were still increasing. Similarly, but to a lesser extent, the State Water Project (SWP) water supply quality through a period from 1983 through 1988 where TDS levels were generally between 250 and r 300 mg/I. As the drought progresses, SWP water has climbed to TDS levels of 350-400 mg/i. A blend of Colorado River and SWP water has supplied the Diemer Filtration Plant in Yorba r Linda, which furnishes about 1/3 of the potable water supply to the CSDOC service area. More recently, 100 percent Colorado River water has been supplied to the Diemer plant. Figure 4-3 r 4-8 r 800 TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS(ma/L) :•maw?ccmcurw,pua[ ¢' O•i70Yi666nE67Pi696' 6a0•'703cl GOT-'700•:680'.602•i 637-:529ni86 1-[600-:609-:616 700 L.. 1............. L.... `.......... ........._......... ........ .. .. v 600 .._.. ._......'._.................. ......... .... . Soo 400 va 300 TOTAL HARDNESS(m9/L 32. 331- 328' 322. 330- 326• 335- 329. 332. 324- 298- 278. 270. 270- 282. 293. 303 200 d 100 0 7d/75 ]5/76 76/]] 77f79 7N79 M/BO 80/91 81/82 81/93 83/Bd 84/ES 95/98 96/97 197M 88/99 1 89/90 90/91 Chemical Quality of Colorado Ricer Water at Whasett Intake Pumping Plant 500 •memow rnuiaenx..wnce m 4bo TOTAL DISSOLVW 60LIDS(m6/L) ' . ........ ... . ... ._ .......... ......._............... ....... ............_.......... ..._ ... 90�'.2 6a� 2S6�IS40� 366�:SNn:S74� J6n;lH�:46H E267a i46N146Y:fI6..7mFli44... J81-:7J 8 m 400 +. ° .' ..........i...-.....j..........1..........j.._...... ..........I.......... ......... .. 360 _!... . ....... ° ........i............................. ....... . 300 _. :.... _......... ....._...... ... 260 200 160 100 60 TOTAL HARDNESS(m6/L) 143- 130. 137- 160- 199- 199- 206- 196- 136- 154- 169n 127. 127. 130- 139. 133. 127 0 ]d/l5 ]5p6 ]e/r7 77pa 78!]9 79/90 80/91 et/B2 82/a3 83/86 ed/95 a5/96 86/87 97186 1 89/B9 99/90 90/01 Chemical Quality of Edmund G. Brown California Aqueduct Water, West Branch ,d B042E FIGURE Er7G1r7EER1r7G Chemical duality of Colorado River ARA - C13RPORRT1Or7 and State Water Project 4-3 1507 Quail Street P.O. Box 3030 Newport Beach, California 92658-9020 (Source: MWDSC Annual Report 1991) shows TDS and total hardness concentrations of the Colorado River water and the State Water Project. The groundwater supplies in the Santa Ana River Basin, which furnish the other 2/3 of the potable water supply, has shown a fairly stable TDS level. During 1990-91, the average TDS concentration of water produced from the groundwater basin was 472 mg/I. Table 4-6 compares the source water and effluent wastewater TDS concentrations of Orange County and the City of Los Angeles. Included in the table is the reclaimed water quality goal of a. the Green Acres Project. Water Factory 21 Brine Recycling m Another related problem that caused the TDS levels in the Plant Number 1 effluent to increase is r the recycling of Water Factory 21 brine into Plant Number 1 treatment system. During 1991,the brine was reportedly recycled back to the secondary clarifier Number 2. The effluent from this clarifier goes to the activated sludge treatment train which explain the increase in TDS levels in the Water Factory 21 0-1 influent. Information obtained from OCWD indicated that the brine discharge has an average flow of 0.9 mgd with a TDS concentration of about 5,850 mg/I. Depending on the flow in the Plant Number 1 treatment system, the resulting TDS concentration Increase would range from 100 mg/I to 150 mg/I. Figure 4-4 shows the increase in TDS levels from 1990 to 1991; the stepped curve compares the average annual TDS values in 1990 and 1991. Since April 1992, WF 21 brine had been re-routed to the interplant ocean outfali for eventual disposal to the ocean. r Water Conservation The recent increase in the TDS levels in the wastewater effluent from the CSDOC treatment plants can also be explained by the on-going drought condition in California which has triggered significant conservation and water supply measures. Due to the drought, the delivery of State Water Project water has been decreased to the treatment plants operated by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California which is the wholesaler of all the imported water in Orange County. These treatment plants and particularly the Diemer filtration plant in .. Yorba Unda which serves a large portion of CSDOC tributary area, use more Colorado River water which has relatively higher TDS concentrations than the State water. Also, the on-going water conservation programs instituted by most water suppliers have decreased the water portion of the wastewater flow which could cause the increase in the 'solids' concentrations such as TDS and other constituents in the effluent wastewater. r 4-9 r m TABLE 4-6 COMPARISON OF SOURCE WATER AND EFFLUENT WATER QUALITIES m Source Water Reclaimed City of LA m Water OCWD Hyperion Colorado State Quell WF 21 !Seconds Constituent Unit RiverM Water(2) Goals) Influent(4) E1nueMlsr General Physical EC µmho/cm 948 663.8 750-2500 (1938) 1070 m TDS mg/I 610 368.8 1260 (696) pH unit 8.35 8.15 4.5-9 - 7.4 Total Alk mg/I 128 89 92-519 282 216 Total Hardness mg/I 298 147 362 207 m MBAS mg/I - - .53 .17 COD mg/I -- - 42 - TOC mg/I - - 13.9 - Susp. Solids mg/I -- - 5.3 11 ,y Color unit - - 35 - Temperature F - - - Cyanide(T) mg/I - - 8.8 - CyanUe(F) mg/I - - - ,d D. Sulfide mg/I -- -T.Toxic Organics mg/I - -- - Oil&Grease mg/I -- --- - m General Minerals m Boron mg/I .23 .27 .75 1.9 .74 Calcium mg/I 71.7 29.5 97 64 Magnesium mg/I 28.8 17.8 29 17 Potassium mg/I 4.4 4 20 11.2 Sodium mg/I 90.7 74.5 271 128 Silica mg/I 9.9 11.5 18 23.5 Chloride mg/I 76 103 142-M 392 143 m Fluoride mg/I .31 .14 1 .84 .67 Nitrate-N mg/I .48 1 530 2.5 1.4 Sulfate mg/I 250 73 316 142 Ammonia-N mg/I -- - 530 24.6 11.2 d Org-N mg/I -- - 1.8 1.8 TKN mg/1 -- - 26.2 - )1) 1989-1990 Average. (2) 1989-1990 Average. ajExcerpts from PRC/JMM Reportfor OCWD,September 1981. OCWD Water Factory 21 Influent 0-1, November 1991. Same as CSDOC Plant 1 secondary effluent. (5) 1988 Average. .. ) ) Calculated Value using TDS/EC Ratio of 0.65. 4-10 m Figure 4-4 TDS CONCENTRATION vs TIME WATER FACTORY 21 INFLUENT 1400 r: P - - MONTHLY AVERAGE YEARLY AVER 1300 T D S 1200 m 9 1100 L 1000 900 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I 90 1 91 MONTH/YEAR TDSTIM.CHT r Home Water Softeners As the mineral content of potable water supplies increases, there will be a gradual increase in V the number of persons who install home water softeners. Consumers install these for a number of reasons which include spotting and filming of dishes and glassware, laundry soap consumption, and film buildup on plumbing fixtures such as shower glass. There is little information available on the number of these units in the CSDOC service area or the rate at r which they are being installed. The net effect on sewage quality Is that from time to time the units are recharged and the brine waste is discharged to the sewer system along with the salt regenerant,thus increasing the salt content of the sewage flow. r r r r r r r V r r 4-11 r r CHAPTER 5 BRINEFLOW AND QUALITY ANALYSIS " Brine discharges from various existing and potential sources in Orange County and from the Upper Santa Ana River Basin contribute high levels of TDS and other constituents to the treatment system of CSDOC. These flows would affect the quality of the wastewater effluent from the treatment plant because secondary biological processes do not materially alter TDS r levels. The effluent from Reclamation Plant Number 1 is the source of the reclaimed water for irrigation and groundwater recharge reuses. Understanding the sources, the quantities and qualities of the brineflows are important to formulate control strategies to improve the quality of r the wastewater effluent. r The following sections summarize the efforts to identify existing and potential brine sources from CSDOC's service area including flows from the Upper Santa Ana River Basin conveyed by r the SARI. The quantity and quality of the brine were studied and projected with particular emphasis on the brineflow in the SARI. r CURRENT BRINE DISPOSAL PRACTICES r Several existing and proposed brine sources in Orange County discharge brine to the local sewers. For instance, the Tustin Nitrate Removal Demonstration plant of OCWD is currently discharging about 0.11 mgd of brine to the sewer on Main Street. This sewer will convey flow to the Red Hill Interceptor and then to the Sunflower Interceptor, which is a major influent r interceptor of the Plant Number 1. The proposed Irvine Desafler and Tustin Desa@er of OCWD are also using sewer discharges as their original brine disposal solutions. A proposed ,r brineline, which will be discussed in the next chapter, would convey all brineflows from these desalting plants including the Tustin Nitrate Demonstration Plant to CSDOC's interplant ocean ouffall for eventual disposal to the ocean. Brine dischargers including industries, dairies and desaflers are discharging their brines to the r SARI. The SARI was constructed in the mid 1970's as a dedicated brine conveying pipeline to carry high TDS flows from the Upper Santa Ana River Basin to the CSDOC treatment system. Presently, about haft of the flow in SARI is municipal sewage from Corona and parts of Riverside County. Future desaflers and potential brine sources will also use SARI for brine disposal. The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA), the agency responsible for the 5-1 r V operation of upper reaches of SARI, has an agreement with CSDOC to purchase up to 30 mgd of flow and treatment rights. Currently, SAWPA has bought B mgd of treatment capacity in CSDOC treatment system for the flows in SARI. IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL BRINE SOURCES Existing and potential brine sources are identified in the CSDOC service area. All flows tributary to both Plants Number 1 and 2 will be considered. The brine sources are divided Into five r, general categories which represent the responsible agencies that have existing or potential projects which would produce brine. The brine sources are grouped as follow: 1. OCWD Wellhead Treatment Plants 2. Orange County Potential Wastewater Reclamation Plants 3. Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Basin Plan Desalters 4. California Department of Health Services Regulations-Wastewater Reclamation Plant ,r Discharges 5. Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority-Arlington Desalter and Brine Flows Information was obtained from agencies and reports including OCWD, CSDOC Master Plan, SAWPA, CRWQCB-Santa Ana Region Basin Plan Amendments, State Water Resource Control Board Inland Surface Waters Plan, California Department of Health Services Guidelines for Groundwater Recharge and Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Brackish ,., Groundwater Desalting Study report. All of the mentioned reports and plans are listed in the reference section. Estimated Quality and Quantity of Brineflow ., Table 5-1 lists all the identified existing and potential brine sources tributary to the CSDOC facility area. Information presented in the table includes tributary area, estimated year of operation, probability of construction, proposed treatment process, product and brineflow, rates, and brine quality estimates of TDS and total nitrogen concentrations. Note that the quantity of brine from each source is discounted according to its respective probability. The planning period is assumed to be 20 years from 1990 to 2010. The concentrations given for TDS and total nitrogen are based on the proposed treatment processes with the assumed removal efficiencies which are listed in the footnotes of Table 5.1. Reverse osmosis (RO), electrodialysis reversal (EDR) and ion exchange (IX) are the primary treatment processes considered in this study. Figure 5-1 presents a location map of all potential brine sources. 5-2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Table it Summary of Flow Projections Tributary to CSDOC Facility Area ..................................................................... Scarce I iv` I tWerrtim I i P<as. I r ( I t 12rim Fromm A. _.i stall"_ Diteoetal<6.1) I la6) ( yI Os Ice.Y ................................................................................... ^ .........CORD MLLREM (ENCIrda TREATMENT PINTS Stamp ------------------ r Tmtfn Nitrate Rashest a 19W 1W As .5 .W .0SIM 84 on D Plain (W LIW) IN .5 .t .02 320W 310 Tustin Desalter 0 1993 9S RD 2 .< .i 9500 140 r Irvin Dealt" 0 19% 95 RDIOR 0.6 1.95 1.85 6000 61 Tort Untie Smatter- PI S.A. Cartoon 1995 TS IW/WR 2 .L .3 9600 6B r Pardon Grove It Nitrate Rowel Plan M MI a IN 2 .O< .02 800 no IkeminSter Nitrate =3 50 IN 1.5 .W .02 WO 700 Raovat Plant n r Be . Walter R 2005 50 RO/Fal 2 .35 .18 9800 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_..._.. wSlE m RECWIATIW r "is IN Doe ------------------ annheia Fardey PI 1996 W W 16 2.0 1.73 Ma 123 to Pales tat Bat BANCI R 1998 60 W 10 1.8 .72 Sim 123 MmOa/N. Irvin 0 Hills W W 1s i.a .18 ]DW 123 Craven Win M 1995 let W W 3.6 3.6 g000 123 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- M - BASIN " DESALTERS-AIT.SC W Chirp DeSatte PI 1995 100 RD/EW 11.4 IM 1.71 5900 IS SE Chiro Oesetter H 1W5 100 RO/EDR 12.2 1.115 1.83 59W n Ry R1ver6ide-Cotta H 1995 50 RO/EDR 10 1.5 .25 5900 n TWecal PI 1995 50 RO/EDR 16.9 2.S4 1.3 59110 n aeaer Hill al 1995 50 Ro/EDR 4.9 .A .37 5900 n r Baas will (3) PI 200O W IN 6.3 .A .2 1 (W 450 .-_--...-_•.............................................................................................•__--•-••-•---------.-......... 1MSIEMATER RECLUaTIW r FLUFFS _- -- ----------------- -traudater RMerse Pit W Br-in (WW)(6) 2010 iW W W 6 6 SOW bD ................................................................................................................... ......'__.___._._.. r sAtlA <5) .____' I I I I I I I 7 20W I 100 -- Arlington Walter H 19W 1W W 3.6 1.1 1.1 51W W Can tin) ---------------------- r -- I datrisl Brine, H 19W 1W VA 3 3 t{ry Wta...................................... 1W .......__.__________-_-- Bata: ............. ....-...... __...._..______. ...........__.. Updated: 6.25-92 (1) Tributary to Plat 1 (P1), Plat 2 (P2), or distimM a own Or tha prapoea I Irvin What in (0). we (2) Brim flow distanced aeoortling to ,rojaot pratbitity. (lovzun (3) Brectia6 Proudater Pectination Study, 1991. W m, Boyle. (() Amme 59 ad Ni I INN unex! for BrmNWatar reehera, 80C of ftw resira trataat aid W W On recovery. (5) FION projection given by Bill DUFdy, SAIPA tarter consultant. (6) tan exchange, Wotess asSFmea to have 9BS ester recovery and Wk nitrate rejectim rate. r (7) WON processes .. 1a have 85N waW recovery, 97Z TDs rejection Intl M nitrate rejection, Nanette Irvin, water wove" atiteted at M Arlington, water recovery reportecl at M. r i -iE1t.� �►'•":LfiNlll.E N � tloi•�,�/� L� ��-{+ .�ifi11�1�__ q�� ?H�Fl■ p� '� �'�y11is11 �e'1� i•r iiauis '� ���h +�■�-r�ti�i �� c WASTEWATER PIP DIVERSIONAND INDUSTRIALBRINE. � DAIRY WASTES ES IDENTIFICATION OF BRINE SOURCES UPPER BASIN DESALTERS BRINE FLOW PROBABILITYOF K: � wwRP SOURCE IMGD.1__ CONSTRUCTION i GW RECHARGE DESALTER . WELLHEAD TREATMENT PLANTS Tustin Nitrate(1) 0.11 On Line Tustin Desalter(1) 0.40 95 /^ - f Irvine Desalter(1) 1.95 95 rfS Yorba Linda Desalter 0.40 75 Garden Grove II Desalter 0.04 60 Westminster Nitrate 0.03 50 Rossmoor Desalter 0.35 50 \ WASTEWATER RECLAMATION PLANTS i_�N, \\\ Anaheim Forebay/ La Palma 2.88 60 \ Seal Beach 1.80 40 Orange/N. Irvine(1) 1.80 10 Crescent Basin 3.60 100 UPPER SANTA ANA BASIN SAWPA Desalters 9.80 Varied ELSALTER Industrial/Dairies 10.00 100 WWRP GIN Recharges 6.0 100 1 (1) Brine to be handled by the Proposed Irvine Brineline. E COUNTY FIGURE IICT LOCATION OF EXISTING AND POTENTIAL BRINE SOURCES 5-1 Projected Brineflow and Quality in SARI v, The SARI is an influent interceptor to the Reclamation Plant Number 1. Brine loadings tributary to Plant Number 1 are extracted from Table 5-1 and summarized in Table 5-2. The low estimate and high estimate columns in Table 5-2 delineate the estimated amount of brineflows tributary to Plant Number 1. For the purpose of analysis, it is assumed that all brineflow tributary to Plant Number 1 except those to be handled by the proposed Irvine Brineline would end up in the Otl SARI eventually. TABLE 5-2 W BRINE LOADING PROJECTIONS TRIBUTARY TO PLANT NUMBER 1 (1) Source Brineflow, mad r 1. OCWD Wellhead Treatment Plants 0.3 2. OCWD Reclamation Plants 1.73 SUBTOTAL-Orange County(2) 2.0 .d 3. SAWPA Current Sewage 4.0 4. SAWPA Current Brineflow 4.1 r 5. SAWPA Proposed Desafters 6.2 6. SAWPA Proposed Brineflow 7.0 m 7. Upper Basin - Potential Groundwater Recharge 6_0 SUBTOTAL-Upper Basin 27.30 r TOTAL 29.3 Notes: (1) By the year 2010. r (2) Excludes all brineflows to be handled by the proposed Irvine Brineline. Based on the estimated concentrations of TDS and total nitrogen from all potential brine sources tributary to Plant Number 1, a projection of the final quality of the brine and combined m flows in the SARI is made. The results are listed in Table 5-3. The brineflow is based on the data given in Table 5-2 and the municipal sewage flow is taken from the projected average flow in the 1999 CSDOC Master Plan Hydraulic Analysis. The TDS and total nitrogen concentrations 5-3 ., of the municipal sewage flow are estimated from recent samplings of the Plant Number 1 influent Interceptors and from the 1991 CSDOC Annual Report. As indicated in Table 5.3, the weighted average of the TDS and total nitrogen concentrations of the combined flow of SARI are 1,840 mg/L and 46 mg/L, respectively. If the entire SARI flow were to be treated at Plant r, Number 1, which is projected to have a capacity of 200 mgd by the year 2010, the combined flow to Plant Number 1 would have TDS and total nitrogen concentrations of 1,584 mg/I and 42 mg/I, respectively. The projected brineflow from treatment of effluent from Upper Santa Ana River Basin's d+ wastewater reclamation plants for groundwater recharge Is based on the anticipated Groundwater Recharge Guidelines by the California Department of Health Services. It Is assumed that 50 mgd of secondary effluent would be diverted for further treatment for subsequent groundwater recharge projects in the Upper Basin. It is also assumed that 80 percent of the flow would require RO treatment and that the RO process has 85 percent w water recovery. - Potential brine sources that have been discussed and are not included in the list in Table 5.1 Include the following: 1) brine from nitrogen removal from the Upper Santa Ana Basin ,r wastewater treatment plants to comply with the CRWOCB Santa Ana Region's Basin Plan Amendment for Total Inorganic Nitrogen (TIN) in all discharges to surface water bodies; 2) brine from Upper Santa Ana Basin wastewater treatment plants to comply with the California r State Water Resource Control Board Inland Surface Waters Plan. The estimated brine flow from these sources is more than 30 mgd. If these brineflows were realized in the future, a new parallel brine interceptor would have to be constructed to handle these flows. r 54 YY ,., TABLE 5-3 WASTEWATER QUALITY PROJECTION IN SARI (Immediately Upstream of Plant Number 1) Total Flow Weighted Average component (madl(mad TDS Tofa1 N• I. Brinell (t) 1. OCWD Wellhead Treatment Projects 0.3 9,600 68 r 2. OC Wastewater Reclamation Plants 1.7 7,700 123 3. SAWPA Desalters 6.2 5,800 84 4. SAWPA's Other Flows 7.0 2,000 100 5. CDHS Wastewater . Reclamation Plants Groundwater Recharge 6.0 5,000 60 6. Current Flow 4.1 s97 r TOTAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE 25.3 4,240 87.3 If. Municipal Sewaae Flow 94.7 1.200 (z) , 5 (3) III. Combined Flow (SARI) TOTAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE 120 (5) 1,840 46 IV. Reclamation Plant Number 1 (4) 200 1,584 42 ,r (Assumes SARI Flow to be treated at Plant Number 1) r (t) Based on data from Table 5-1. (2) 1991 average of all Influent Interceptors to Plant Number 1 excluding SARI. (3) 1991 average of Plant Number 1 Influent(TKN). r (4) Assumed that the entire SARI flow is treated at Plant Number 1. (5) Master Plan projected flow. r r 5-5 r r POTENTIAL PROBLEMS IN BRINE/WASTEWATER QUALITY CONTROL a Hydraulic Deficiency of SARI in Santa Ana Canyon There are identified capacity problems in the SARI reach in the Santa Ana Canyon. The 1989 r CSDOC Master Plan indicated that at ultimate flows,the SARI reach between Grove Street and Yorba Linda Regional Park would be overloaded. Figure 5.2 shows the SARI capacity deficiency in this reach, assuming a 30 mgd flow at the county line from upper basin, and the ultimate flow in the other SARI tributaries. Planning is underway for a relief sewer in this SARI reach. Future recommendations for brineflow control or diversion could coordinate with this proposed relief sewer. Hydraulic Limitations in Plant Nos. 1 and 2 Influent Sewers r. The hydraulic capacity of all major influent interceptors were discussed in Chapter 3. Table 3-4 compared the rated and projected capacities in the interceptors. It can be seen that there are no interceptors other than the SARI which have excess capacity for a 30 mgd brineflow. r Diverting the 30 mgd brineflow from SARI into any other interceptors beside the SARI is not possible. This limitation has ruled out all upstream diversion possibilities for segregating the r brine from the sewage flow in the SARI. Possible strategies for improving the quality of Plant Number 1 influent might include continuing diversion of SARI flow from Plant Number 1 to Plant Number 2 and construction of a new brine interceptor to convey brineflow from the upper SARI reaches to Plant Number 2. These brine routing options together with other downstream diversion options will be discussed in detail in the next chapter. Planned Capacity Improvement in CSDOC Treatment Plants V Reclamation Plant Number 1 and Treatment Plant Number 2 are projected to require treatment capacity of 200 mgd each by the year 2020. If the entire SARI flow, which has a projected total flow of about 120 mgd, were to divert to Plant Number 2, the hydraulic flow between the two r treatment plants would be out of balance. Plant Number 1 would operate below the design capacity while Plant Number 2's rapacity would be overloaded. Therefore, the control/diversion strategies proposed from this study must also consider the hydraulic balance of the two treatment plants. Information obtained from CSDOC management indicated that the planned ultimate capacity of Plant Number 1 and Plant Number 2 should be about the same .d because of institutional issues as well as space utilization. 5-6 r s� r FIAW VS CAPACITY uo mA uo m2^ cnew+*v DEIFC � w cna� Ono wVERSDEFWY c?� 0 SANTA ANA .q� RIVER INTERCEPTOR RECLAMATION PLANT #9 o ED Wastewater Quality , Treatment & Diversion Study — TREATMENT PLANT #2 Bcv�e \\ 13. on SARI SEWER FIG. PACFC BEAN \O x.'�"LIZ cmmm ft s92458-"2o' CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES 5_2 \ 714 i 4763300 at ultimate flows CHAPTER 6 BRINE ROUTING ANALYSIS The main purpose of brine routing is to improve the wastewater quality of the effluent from Reclamation Plant Number 1 by routing all brineflows to Treatment Plant Number 2. Brine sources tributary to Plant Number 2 will not be Included in this analysis. It is also assumed that the brine sources tributary to Plant Number 1 except those to be handled by the proposed Irvine Brineline would and up in the SARI so that efforts could be concentrated on diverting or paralleling the SARI. Several alternatives were considered in analyzing the brine routing and wastewater quality control for Plant Number 1. The baseline alternative, which is basically a no action alternative, ,r would let all brineflows go to existing sewers or interceptors. CSDOC would not consider how to Improve the quality of the effluent except to operate within the discharge limits of the NPDES v permit. OCWD would have to upgrade Its treatment plant to handle Influent secondary treated wastewater with higher concentrations of TDS, nitrogen and other minor constituents. The second alternative is the new interceptor alternative which Includes several options of constructing new brine interceptors to convey brine directly to Treatment Plant Number 2. The third alternative is the interplant bypass pipeline alternative which involves the continued diversion of the SARI flow and the construction of an interplant bypass force main and a pump station to divert sewage flow normally tributary to Plant Number 2 over to Plant Number 1. r Each of the above alternatives will be discussed in this chapter. A summary of the proposed Irvine Brineline by OCWD in south Orange County to convey existing and potential brine from ` its tributary area to the Interplant ocean outfall will be Included. Potential strategies to route Plant Number 1 waste sidestreams and Water Factory 21 brine to Plant Number 2 will also be discussed. Finally, cost estimates for all brine routing alternatives will be given In the last section. "- s-t BRINE/SEWAGE ROUTING ALTERNATIVES The Baseline Alternative This alternative is a no action alternative. Under this alternative, CSDOC would maintain the existing treatment and sewage conveyance system without any major improvements to divert brine or sewage for wastewater quality control in Plant Number 1. However, CSDOC will still follow the Master Plan recommended improvements and operate the treatment system to comply with the NPDES requirements. OCWD's treatment plants, which use the secondary ,., effluent from Reclamation Plant Number 1, will have to upgrade their treatment process to account for the degraded Influent quality caused by the projected brineflows. This alternative would increase the capital and operation costs of the Water Factory 21 and the Green Acres Project. Higher TDS and nitrogen concentrations In the influent water would mean more treatment would be needed to produce reclaimed water that would be suitable for groundwater Injection or irrigation. r The main objective of this study is to devise strategies to improve the effluent quality of the Reclamation Plant Number 1 which in turn would improve the quality of the reclaimed water produced from Water Factory 21 and the Green Acres Project treatment plant. However, the effect of this baseline alternative on the Green Acres Project (GAP) and the Water Factory 21 (WF 21) will be briefly discussed below. m The data from Table 5-3 indicated that if the projected SARI flow(including brineflow)were to be treated at Plant Number 1, the combined flow would have a TDS concentration of about 1,584 mg/l. Compared to the current average Influent TDS concentration of 1,200 mg/l, it would be a 32 percent increase. In order to not exceed the TDS concentration limit of 1,050 mg/I, the GAP -- would require a reverse osmosis (RO) treatment plant to demineralize part of the Influent flow. -• To estimate the capacity of the RO plant, the GAP influent flow is assumed to be 15 mgd and the RO process is assumed to have recovery of 80 percent and salt rejection of 98 percent. Based on mass balance, the RO feed flow is determined to be about 7 mgd. For the WF 21,the _ influent flow is assumed to be 25 mgd and that the existing RO plant capacity would have already been expanded to 15 mgd. Higher TDS content in the influent would require a higher operating pressure of the RO system to maintain the desired salt rejection rate. A higher operating cost would be expected because of increased pressure required to remove the excess TDS content. Preliminary order-of-magnitude estimates of the costs to upgrade the GAP and the WF 21 indicate that the capital cost would be about $10 million for the GAP and 6-2 w the total O&M costs would be about$2.5 million per year with$1.5 million for the GAP and$1.0 million for the WF 21. These costs are included in a later section to compare the relative costs d of the various alternatives. d The New Interceptors Alternative Three routing options were considered in this alternative. Taking into consideration the d capacity deficiency of the SARI reach at Santa Ana Canyon, all three of these options include the construction of a parallel interceptor at the SARI Santa Ana Canyon reach. The capacity of .. the new brine interceptors is assumed to be 30 mgd which is the maximum capacity of SARI flow from SAWPA's service area to the CSDOC treatment system. In Chapter 5, the projected brineflow from Plant Number 1 tributary area was 29.3 mgd (including about 4 mgd of current sewage flow). For the purpose of analysis, 30 mgd is assumed to be the capacity of the new interceptors. d The La Palma/Magnolia route would divert SARI brineflow directly to Plant Number 2 tributary r system. The Santa Ana River route would follow the existing alignment of the SARI. The Glassell/Grand route will divert the SARI brineflow through the southeastern part of the CSDOC service area. The last two routing options would also require flow diversions at Plant Number 1 to Plant Number 2, possibly through the interplant interceptors on Ellis Avenue and Brookhurst Street. Figure B-1 shows the location of the three brine interceptors. r Under these new brine interceptor options, CSDOC has the potential savings of the capital cost to construct the parallel interceptor at the Santa Ana Canyon area. If the parallel interceptor were to be built,the capital cost would be about$4 million. Discussion of other possible capital savings to CSDOC is also included in the following section on the proposed La Palma/Magnolia Interceptor. The La Palma/Magnolia Route r This potential new interceptor route starts from the SARI reach adjacent to Yorba Linda Regional Park, parallels the SARI along La Palma Avenue to Grove Street, and then extends westward to Magnolia Street following La Palma Avenue. The pipeline would then continue r south paralleling the alignment of the Magnolia-Bushard Trunk. This route would end at Ellis Avenue where the Bushard Street Trunk would convey the flow to Plant Number 2. This option would require that the Bushard Street Trunk be oversized to accommodate the potential - 6-3 ,r 9 r R jjj GARDEN GROV II r�-• NITRATE REMO AL PLA I LROSSMOOR DESALTER SEAL BEACH WWRP' - ,A ems, �?rkl EST] ITRA L •. EMO' 41 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Vo OF ORANGE COUNTY & ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT WASTERWATER DUALITY, TREATMENT w AND DIVERSION STUDY FIGURE 6-1 POTENTIAL BRINE INTERCEPTOR ROUTES _ =1I _ r Jl h x y � �i 4 INDUSTRIAL BRINE DAIRY WASTES r ` UPPER BASIN! DESALTERS y �.. _ - �.^ •Y W WRP YORBA LIND --SALTER GW RECHARGE A P MA-WWRP ANA M POREB Y W WRP i iESCENT BASIN W Li VT ORANGE WRP { TUSTIN DESALTER IINSTER - �-- E'p'f'r:" __ ' .TUSTIN NITRATE DEMO. PLANT AL PLANT 7. i ��• 777777 N r^ � Q 1 IgVINE DESALTER . LEGEND LA PALMA / MAGNOLIA ROUTE - SANTA ANA RIVER ROUTE -�"'--V - GLASSEL / GRAND ROUTE tz. -. r •. \_ ------ PROPOSED HiVINE BRINELINE ROUTE P2 TO P7 DIVERSION PIPELINE brineflow. Capacity improvement for the Bushard Street Trunk was recommended In the 1989 CSDOC Master Plan. This routing option would convey brineflow in the SARI from the SAWPA service area to Treatment Plant Number 2 directly. The sewage flow from Orange County to the SARI could be treated in Plant Number 1 if future expansion of the plant requires more Influent flow. Under this option, the existing and potential brineflows from OCWD's desalters would be handled by the atl proposed Irvine Brineline. ,r A potential benefit to CSDOC for this routing option is the savings of about $4 million for the rehabilitation of the existing Magnolia-Bushard Interceptor. That reach of the proposed brine interceptor paralleling the Magnolia-Bushard Interceptor could be oversized to accommodate the projected sewage flow in that sewer. This 20 year old sewer line could then be abandoned in place or be used as a standby interceptor. Preliminary estimate for this route reveals that about 12 miles of 42-inch, 3 miles of 54-inch and 7 miles of 60-inch pipe are needed. This option requires the longest length of pipeline among the three routes and is the option with the highest capital cost. The Santa Ana River Route This interceptor route also starts from the SARI reach adjacent to Yorba Linda Regional Park and parallels the SARI alignment along the Santa Ana River to Plant Number 1. The entire flow of this potential interceptor would then be diverted at Plant Number 1 to Plant Number 2 through the interplant influent interceptor. Construction of this SARI parallel would probably be the least costly option among all the _ proposed interceptors because of its shorter length and less traffic and utilities obstructions. Boyle has reviewed the construction plans of the SARI along the alignment of this proposed route. Most segments of the existing SARI easement are wide enough to accommodate another 42-inch pipe. Some lengths of the proposed pipe would be located beneath the river and some portion might require shoring during construction to protect the existing SARI pipe. The design and construction of this SARI parallel may present an engineering challenge, but it is a technically feasible option. This option would segregate the brineflow from the SARI, thus allowing the sewage flow in the SARI to be treated at Plant Number 1, if required. Diversion facilities would be needed at Plant 6-4 Number 1 metering and diversion structure to handle the flow from this SARI parallel interceptor. Preliminary estimates for pipeline size and length indicate that this route requires the shortest length of pipe. About 17 miles of 42-inch pipe is required. The Glassell/Grand Route e. This proposed route also starts from the SARI reach in Yorba Linda Regional Park, parallels the SARI to Grove Street, and then takes a sharp southerly turn to the AT&SF railroad easement until it meets Glassell Street. The pipeline would then continue south along Glassell Street and Grand Avenue to Dyer Road. The final length of the pipeline would follow the alignment of the Santa Ana Trunk (which is also called the Talbert Trunk) to Plant Number 1. This pipeline route would be constructed through most of the densely developed sections of .. several cities. Significant utilities obstructions,traffic, commercial and residential inconvenience are expected along the proposed route. Similar to the Santa Ana River Route, this option would also segregate the brine from SARI flow and require diversion at Plant Number 1. Preliminary calculation indicated that the total length of pipe required is about 20 miles with 14 miles of 42-inch pipe and 6 miles of 48-inch pipe. Table 6-1 summarizes the size and length requirements of the three interceptor routes. fi-5 YY TABLE 6.1 SIZE AND LENGTH OF PROPOSED BRINE INTERCEPTORS Length Route Location Slope Sizem miles .y 1. La Palma/ Yorba Linda Regional Park 0.0031 42" 12 Magnolia to Magnolia Maggnolia to Ball (2) 0.0014 54" 3 d' Balfto Ellis )2) 0.0014 60" 7 Total 22 2. Santa Ana Yorba Linda Regional Park 0.0031 42" 4 River to Linda Vista Linda Vista to Plant Number 1 0.0027 42" 13 r Total 17 3. Glassell/ Yorba Linda Regional Park 0.0024 42" 10 Grand to Santiago Creek Santiago Creek to Warner 0.0060 42" 4 Warner to Plant Number 1 0.0012 48" S Total 20 11) Based on 0 = 30 mgd,d/D - 0.75 and Manning's n = 0.013. er (2) Pipeline oversized to accommodate the projected flow in the Magnolia-Bushard Interceptor. Downstream Interplant Bypass/Diversion Alternative This alternative considers diverting 40 mgd of the influent sewers tributary to Plant Number 2 to .+ Plant Number 1. The purpose is to balance the flow to the two treatment plants assuming that the entire flow of the SARI is to be diverted to Plant Number 2. The projected ultimate flow of SARI is about 120 mgd. Under this alternative, the SARI flow will continue to be diverted to Plant Number 2 and no upstream diversion of brineflow is provided. It is also assumed that all brineflows tributary to Plant Number 1 would end up in SARI except brineflows from the proposed Irvine Brineline. 66 r Facilities required for this alternative Include a 40 mgd pump station, 8,000 feet of 48-Inch force main and possible improvements for the metering and diversion structure at Plant Number 1. The force main route would start from the intersection of Ellis Avenue and Bushard Street, continue east along Ellis Avenue paralleling the existing 33-Inch force main until it reaches the metering and diversion structure. A new pump station would replace the existing one on Ellis Avenue. The existing 33-inch force main, with capacity of about 19 mgd, along Ellis Avenue would be used as a standby interplant diversion pipeline. The sizing of the pump station and new parallel force main is based on the ultimate projected ^• flow to the two treatment plants, which is 480 mgd. For each treatment plant, the planned capacity is 240 mgd. Of the total flow, about two-thirds will be from Plant Number 1 tributary d area. If no interplant diversion is provided, the flow to Plant Number 1 and Plant Number 2 would be 320 mgd and 160 mgd, respectively. This alternative proposes to divert the entire SARI projected flow of 120 mgd to Plant Number 2; the remaining flow to Plant Number 1 would then be 200 mgd which is 40 mgd less than the planned capacity,thus requiring diversion from Plant Number 2 tributary area. Figure 3-5 in Chapter 3 presents a flow schematic of this diversion alternative. The feasibility of using a gravity sewer instead of pumping has been investigated. The conclusion is that it is not feasible to construct a gravity sewer for diversion of e sewage from Plant Number 2 tributary area to Plant Number 1 because the slope would be insufficient to support an adequate flow. The proposed pump station would convey sewage from the Knott Interceptor to Plant Number 1. The 1989 CSDOC Master Plan projected the flow in the Knott Interceptor to be about 110 mgd at the Intersection of Ellis Avenue and Bushard Street. If necessary, standby capacity could also be made to divert sewage from the Magnolia-Bushard Interceptor. r Figure 6-2 shows the facilities and locations of this alternative. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED IRVINE BRINELINE Boyle has recently completed a study for the OCWD regarding the feasibility of constructing a dedicated brineline in the Tustin/Irvine area to convey existing and potential brineflows from its tributary area to the interplant ocean outfall pipeline along the Santa Ana River. Figure 6-3 shows the alignment of the proposed Irvine Brineline. A force main route and an alternate gravity line route are shown on the figure. The proposed brineline has two main reaches: the Tustin reach and the Irvine reach. Both the force main and gravity line routes of 6-7 WESTMINSTE �1(1�pp�y T I r '�ni--• 3 r 1 r yp' � �Iv a s. �- MEMOPIAL PAN MR 9YI � I I ] I rF � \ ■ U TJ ,M p 9 F I �.. � 1 n Icamnervl I {��-, d ro>✓r=u I x � 9 it p I it d `( f � 1 t �.3'', Irv+ e4 � p�1y�..N !t tYl^ I _ NI�•Iµ( I II I i ._ ly ±,r . _� r4 «r.,riooE.s r ac • r If li"lf Illl d ,� + _ uu T ems. I L ♦ I z I 1 .. .o ape ` nl u. fill: x eTre,J}1` ESTIMIN TER NTEPso _: 4717., ix+P:. �II .II �� vetnr c tC - l _I 61q.e".P °" vvv LM ndl sel Y T I �c' '. wFvi MlvyT, p �M, �I HHYI c I d f po r ISOR5A7d �iiii}:Y_ 11 u, lI Id I' �ILJL ,Isll �� L, I meRxe (CL05E0) n s a'LPF'Nl�t , o we51�111 k'A 1kUH °�° • 20 _ I LL Go J :...... 7 7 "4/IrRerspprg ' oce.M n _' — !I r ( I • I T __ .. f __ c44ks a �� �qk sx S� e e. ;A 9 ��I • l' -J ,e h \.� '. IY � Scale: 1" = 2000' +'I Hann I;: l li .•� Se..v e, 21� bpi LEGEND »« - - `------- UN1'IM({NN 4l:ACH I- •CORP NOUNp..RI ' .ram. $.bll KNOTT INTERCEPTOR _ uN.•�u ' _ MAGNOLIA-BUSHARD p i wb / TRUNK .a�K.oNw� F „ „ . . v w. �C. I' rqub MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK PROPOSED PUMP , 1 « STATION bR i3 PROPOSED INTERPLANT 1 • � ' DIVERSION PIPELINE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY INTERPLANT DIVERSION FIG. /304�LE & ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT WASTEWATER QUALITY, TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE 6-2 AND DIVERSION STUDY � p •-I W W In = --- - 1`` x ¢ ~ F TRU UNK � � •_I � � MY TLE STR ET = O TRUN Q.s^ - � I 7 = W 2 l\ M n - 1 IxEDINGER AVENUE Zcc Iuj \\n W a. IT _ . J y i p O DYER RDA F- TRUNK ILI I J t7 RUWK G ..... .. IL Z W� R m _ U P TRUN 8rF UNF WER - , 1 tERC PTOR Z RECLAM " M s 9i ED ILL NK M r NENK RBA N '� %''• KER— I$___ INTFRCEPS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF MOM eovt.E ertawimww tc cowwowarinn ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Imm [onsuitim snwnssrs i srcnitscts WASTEWATER DUALITY , TREATMEN' 4. F Z TUSTIN DESALTER Nam. ~ "1" p 0.4 MGD ,• l r ¢ l O .iy .. z TUSTIN NITRATE REMOVA� DEMONSTRATION PLANT �+ 0.11 MGD (. ` W y `.�, SCALE: 1" = 4000' Y� ' LEGEND > ' 0.11 MGD AVERAGE G : SE0434T Sj0 BRINEFLOW 4 G� FORCE MAIN �C�ac"Ea.eiCSDOC �0 ROUTE NAVY WAY P.S., QCO (v� (TO BE ABAND.) q9i( GRAVITATENE ALTERN ROUTE IRWD P.S.•e. (ABAND.) II IN IRVINE DESALTER 9 t95 MGD iRANGE COUNTY AND IRVINE BRINELINE ALIGNMENT FIG. 6-3 AND DIVERSION STUDY the Irvine reach would continue along Irvine Center Drive until joining the Tustin reach at the junction of Red Hill Avenue and Edinger Avenue. The force main route of the Tustin reach would take a southwesterly route along Newport Avenue and the gravity route would continue west on 17th Street and then go south on Prospect Street to the junction. The combined flow from the Tustin and Irvine reaches would then be conveyed along Edinger Avenue and Santa Ana River where it joins with the flow in the existing interplant ocean outfall pipeline. r The estimated peak brineflow from the Irvine Brineline is about 3.5 mgd. The average brineflow from all existing and proposed desalters and wellhead treatment plants of OCWD accounts for about 2.5 mgd of the total flow. Preliminary cost estimates prepared for the study indicated that the capital costs for the construction of the Irvine Brineline would be about$11.83 million for the ,., force main option and about$12.12 million for the gravity line option. ROUTING OF WATER FACTORY 21 BRINE AND PLANT NUMBER 1 WASTE SIDESTREAMS r In Chapters 4 and 5, the wastewater quality problems associated with the recycling of the WF 21 brine and Plant Number 1 filtrate and waste sidestreams back to the Plant Number 1 r treatment system were identified. r WF 21 brine has been recycled back to the secondary clarifier Number 2 of Plant Number 1. Previous discussion revealed that the effect of the brine on the effluent quality is significant. The r TDS concentrations of the effluent from Plant Number 1 would increase by 100 to 150 mg/L depending on the wastewater flow of the plant. Modification of the routing of the WF 21 brine was completed in April 1992. The brine now discharges to the interplant ocean outfall on the r east side of Plant Number 1 along the Santa Ana River. The flow in this pipeline will eventually go to the ocean outfall without further treatment. This brine routing would continue as long as all the physical and chemical constituents of the combined effluent flow are in compliance with the limits of the NPDES permit. OCWD reports that the average brineflow from WF 21 for 1991 is 0.9 mgd which is less than 0.4 percent of the CSDOC combined average ocean effluent discharge of 260 mgd for 1991. CSDOC also reported that the filtrate from the filter press dewatering units and other waste washwater streams from Plant Number 1 have been returned to the secondary clarifier Number 2 in the trickling filter treatment train. Previous results showed that these waste sidestrears have increased the nitrogen concentrations of the affluent by about 6 mg/L of ammonia-N or 7 6.8 the Irvine reach would continue along Irvine Center Drive until joining the Tustin mach at the junction of Red Hill Avenue and Edinger Avenue. The force main route of the Tustin reach would take a southwesterly route along Newport Avenue and the gravity route would continue west on 17th Street and then go south on Prospect Street to the junction. The combined flow from the Tustin and Irvine reaches would then be conveyed along Edinger Avenue and Santa Ana River where it joins with the flow in the existing interplant ocean outfall pipeline. The estimated peak brineflow from the Irvine Brineline is about 3.5 mgd. The average brineflow from all existing and proposed desalters and wellhead treatment plants of OCWD accounts for about 2.5 mgd of the total flow. Preliminary cost estimates prepared for the study Indicated that the capital costs for the construction of the Irvine Brineline would be about$11.83 million for the force main option and about$12.12 million for the gravity line option. ROUTING OF WATER FACTORY 21 BRINE AND PLANT NUMBER 1 WASTE SIDESTREAMS In Chapters 4 and 5, the wastewater quality problems associated with the recycling of the WF 21 brine and Plant Number 1 filtrate and waste sidestreams back to the Plant Number 1 treatment system were identified. WF 21 brine has been recycled back to the secondary clarifier Number 2 of Plant Number 1. Previous discussion revealed that the effect of the brine on the effluent quality is significant. The r TDS concentrations of the effluent from Plant Number 1 would increase by 100 to 150 mg/L depending on the wastewater flow of the plant. Modification of the routing of the WF 21 brine was completed in April 1992. The brine now discharges to the interplant ocean oulfall on the r east side of Plant Number 1 along the Santa Ana River. The flow in this pipeline will eventually go to the ocean outfall without further treatment. This brine routing would continue as long as all the physical and chemical constituents of the combined effluent flow are in compliance with the limits of the NPDES permit. OCWD reports that the average brineflow from WF 21 for 1991 .. is 0.9 mgd which is less than 0.4 percent of the CSDOC combined average ocean effluent discharge of 260 mgd for 1991. CSDOC also reported that the filtrate from the filter press dewatering units and other waste washwater streams from Plant Number 1 have been returned to the secondary clarifier Number 2 in the trickling filter treatment train. Previous results showed that these waste sidestreams have increased the nitrogen concentrations of the effluent by about 6 mg/L of ammonia-N or 7 6-8 mg/L of TKN. The TDS concentrations of the waste sidestreams are not known; they would probably contribute to some extent the Increase of TDS concentrations In the effluent. CSDOC is negotiating with the EPA and the CRWOCB to divert these waste sidestreams to Treatment Plant Number 2 through the Interplant sewer on Ellis Avenue. Previous objections from the EPA centered on the Issue of representative sampling of the influent sewage of Plant Number 2. EPA's focus is that if the sidestreams are diverted to the influent of Plant Number 2, any sample taken from the headworks of Plant Number 2 would not be representative of the raw sewage from its service area. Recent contacts with these two regulatory agencies have resulted in positive responses and CSDOC will continue to pursue the approval of this sidestreams diversion issue. If approval were obtained, capacity in the sidestreams pump station of Plant Number 1 would be available to pump the filtrate and other washwaters to the Ellis interplant sewer. A small `tl diameter pipeline would be required to connect the pump station and the Interplant sewer. This diversion strategy could also be used for the WF 21 brine if future situations prohibit the direct discharge of brine to the ocean outfall. ` COST ESTIMATES Order-of-magnitudes estimates of probable capital cost are provided for the three new interceptor routes and are presented in Table 6-2. Similar capital and O&M costs are estimated for the interplant diversion alternative in Table 6.3. Table 6-4 presents a comparison of the annualized costs of the alternatives. The O&M costs of the proposed new interceptors are assumed to be negligible. The cost data given in Table 6-2 are based on several construction factors and thus the unit costs given are varied. The depth of the cover,the amount of utility obstructions, and the extent of traffic interference are the major factors contributing to the estimate of the unit costs. The estimates also include the cost to modify the Metering and Diversion structure at Plant Number 1 for brine diversion. It is noted that construction costs given are to be used for comparison of the routing alternatives only. More precise costs must be obtained by a detailed study of the ., pipeline alignments. ., The capital and O&M costs given in Table 6-3 are based on the assumptions that land at the existing Ellis Avenue pump station is available or could be acquired for the expanded capacity. 6-9 r The 0&M costs are comprised mainly of two components: the maintenance of the force main/pump station and the energy cost for pumping. Pumping energy required is estimated by using 67 percent of the energy requirement at peak flow condition, which represents the average energy requirement for the typical diurnal flow pattern. The pumps would operate on a r pump curve based on the characteristics of the influent flow. Energy cost is assumed to be $0.08 per kwhr. CSDOC may be able to obtain interruptible energy which is at much lower r cost, however,the higher cost is assumed for this cost estimate. r r r r r r r r 6-10 r TABLE 6-2 CAPITAL COSTS OF PROPOSED BRINE INTERCEPTORS Unit Cost r Route Description - Lenath $/LFl m� n I. La Palma/Magnolia Route 1. 42', 15'cover 64,500' 340 21.9 2. 54", 18'cover 16,000- 432 7.0 3. 60', 18'cover 37,500' 480 18.0 4. Diversion Facilities I11 - - 1.0 5. Contingency and Services 15% 12 le Total 5 s, 6. Potential CSDOC Savings(2) (8.0) It. Santa Ana River Route r 1. 42"In roads,20'cover 22,000' 360 7.9 2. 42"In river, 12'cover 68,000, 295 20.0 3. Diversion Facilities It> - - 1.0 r 4. Contingency and Services 15% 41 i7 ml a Total `+ 5. Potential CSDOC Savings (3) (4.0) III. Glassell/Grand Route 1. 42", 15'cover 52,300' 340 17.8 2. 42'.20'cover 22,400' 360 8.1 3. 48", 12'cover 30,500' 385 11.7 etl 4. Diversion Facilities ltl - - 1.0 5. Contingency and Services 15% �Q r 2'b-mm� Total 6. Potential CSDOC Savings DI (8.0) r 111 Cost to modify the Metering and Diversion structure at Plant Number 1 for brine diversion. (2) Capital saving or $4 million for Santa Ana Canyon Parallel Interceptor and $4 million for Magnolia-Bushard Interceptor Rehabilitation. .. (3) Capital saving of$4 million for Santa Ana Canyon Parallel Interceptor only. r 6-11 .d TABLE 6-3 CAPITAL AND 0 & M COSTS OF INTERPLANT DIVERSION ALTERNATIVE .. I. Capital Costs .d 1. Pump Station 40 mgd capacity 80'pumping head $3,000,000 2. Force Main 48-Inch .d 8,000 LF at$385/LF $3,080.000 3. Diversion Facilities(1) $1.000.000 Subtotal $7,080,000 4. Contingency and Services at 15% $1.afi2.000 ,r 5. Total Capital Cost 142 ll. 0 &M Costs 1. Maintenance Pump Station $ 200,000 Pipeline,$3,000/mlle/year $ 10,000 r 2. Energy $0.08/kwhr $ 270,000 67%of peak flow energy(2) 365 days/year 3. Total 0&M Cost $ 480.00g (1) Modification of Metering and Diversion structure at Plant Number 1. (2) Represent average energy requirement of the diumal flow pattern. r 6-12 `+ TABLE 6-4 COMPARISON OF ANNUALIZED COSTS OF ROUTING ALTERNATIVES Total Potential Capital O&M Annualized Present CSDOC(4) Cost Cost Cost(+) Worth(2) Savings Alternatives ($ million) ($ million) ($ million) ($ million) ($million) 1. La Palma/Magnolia Route 55.0 -- 4.40 55.0 8.0 .. 2. Santa Ana River Route 33.2 - 2.66 33.2 4.0 3. Glassell/Grand Route 44.4 -- 3.55 "A 4.0 r 4. Interplant Diversion 8.1 0.5 1.15 14.4 - 5. Wastewater Desallnatlon (3) 10.0 2.5 3.3 40.5 - (1) Amortization for n = 50 years, 1= 8%,CRF - 0.08. (2) includes present worth of O&M costs over 50 years. Refer to page 6-2 for cost components. (4) Capital Costs for Santa Ana Canyon Parallel Interceptor and Magnolla-Bushard Interceptor Rehabilitation. r The data In Tables 6-2 and 6-4 indicate that among the proposed new interceptors, the Santa Ana River route has the shortest length of pipe and the lowest capital cost of$33.2 million. The proposed interplant diversion alternative has a capital cost of$8.1 million and a O&M cost of ,. about $0.5 million per year. Comparing the annualized costs among the different routing alternatives, the interplant diversion alternative has the lowest present worth, at $14.4 million. The capital and 0&M costs of upgrading the OCWD's treatment plants for additional wastewater desalination are also given. r r r 6-13 W CHAPTER 7 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS The quality of the wastewater effluent from the CSDOC Reclamation Plant Number 1 could be Improved by implementing one of the routing strategies described in Chapter 6 to direct or .. bypass all brineflows to Plant Number 2. On the other hand, CSDOC should maintain an active and aggressive source control program to monitor all existing and potential industrial as well as other brine discharges. The following section will briefly described the recommended routing and source control strategies. Source Control Strategies The existing source control ordinances do not provide monitoring and sampling for brine or other industrial discharges with only high TDS content. Sampling and monitoring of industrial discharges are focused on heavy metals and toxic organics. It Is therefore recommended that ^� CSDOC modify its existing source control ordinance to include TDS concentrations and EC monitoring in its industrial and other brine discharge permits. Industrial brine sources should Include all major water conditioning companies, electronic industries with water purification equipment, medical and chemical testing laboratories, dairies, and other discharges with potential high TDS content. Municipal brine sources would include all wellhead treatment plants, wastewater reclamation plants and regional groundwater treatment plants that include brine-producing facilities. .. Sampling CSDOC should continue to sample all major industrial and municipal discharges for heavy metals and toxic organics. EC and TDS concentrations for sampling should be added to all existing and potential brine dischargers. Sampling for general minerals and other water quality parameters should also be done at least once every year to establish baseline references. Minerals and parameters such as chloride, boron, alkalinity, hardness and pH are essential to determine the overall quality of the effluent wastewater. 7-1 Discharge Qualfty Goals CSDOC could revise the existing source control quality limits considering not only the NPDES requirements, but also the quality of the reclaimed water to be produced. Maximum concentration limits for TDS, heavy metals and other related minerals could be established in the discharge permits from brine sources and other industries. One example would be to establish a limit for boron, which is not currently regulated. High levels of boron in the reclaimed water could inhibit the normal growth of certain plants and vegetation. Discharge Quarttity Limit Considering the capacity of the existing and potential brine interceptors, it is recommended that — CSDOC limit the brine inflow quantity according to the quality limits of the NPDES permit. The main parameter would be nitrogen which has a NPDES limit of 30 mg/L as ammonia nitrogen. In Chapter 5, the estimated nitrogen concentration of brineflow alone is about 87 mg/L. Ytl Combinined with the nitrogen from other municipal, commercial and industrial discharges, the nitrogen limit would easily be exceeded. If the present treatment processes were not to be. modified to increase nitrogen removal, a discharge quantity limit must be set for brine. Routing Strategy r Comparing the cost estimates for the four routing alternatives, the interplant diversion alternative has the lowest present worth cost of $14.4 million, and is therefore the recommended routing strategy. Several advantages of this alternative are given: a, 1. It has the lowest capital cost,total annualized cost and present worth cost. 2. It would allow the continued diversion of the entire SARI flow to Plant Number 2. CONCLUSIONS The existing and planned facilities of the CSDOC treatment and conveyance system are able to provide adequate treatment for the projected wastewater flow within its service area. However, .. the hydraulic condition of the present system cannot handle segregated projected flow of 30 mgd from the Upper Santa Ana River Basin without the construction of a new brine interceptor. Upstream or downstream diversions of the existing sewers to provide capacity for the projected brineflow are almost impossible because of capacity limitations in the influent interceptors. Evaluation of the recent and past samplings of the major influent interceptors to Reclamation Plant Number 1 revealed that the SARI and the Sunflower interceptors have the highest TDS 7-2 concentrations. Recent sampling of the Sunflower Interceptor showed a decrease in TDS levels. The TDS and nitrogen concentrations of the influent and effluent wastewater have increased steadily over the past two years. Explanations proposed for the changes include water conservation, quality Of the source water and the recycling of waste sidesireams of Plant Number 1. Recycling of the Water Factory 21 brine back to Plant Number 1 has also been Identified as a past cause of TDS concentration increase in the effluent. Brine sources from various existing and potential wellhead treatment plants, wastewater reclamation plants, industrial and dairy discharges have been identified. The quantity of brine .., produced from these projects, which are tributary to the Plant Number 1 service area, are estimated to range up to 29.3 mgd (including 4 mgd of current sewage flow). All these brineflows, except those to be handled by the proposed Irvine Brineline, are assumed to converge to the existing SARI or the proposed SARI parallel interceptor. For the purpose of cost estimation, 30 mgd was assumed to be the projected brineflow. A projection of the quality of the brineflow alone indicated that the combined TDS concentration would be 4,240 mg/L and the combined nitrogen concentration would be 87.3 mg/L. If the brine is co-mingled with .. municipal sewage in the SARI, the projected quality of the combined SARI flow would result in TDS and nitrogen concentration of 1,840 mg/L and 46 mg/L, respectively (Table 5-3). .. Various brine and wastewater routing alternatives have been presented. Three of them involved upstream segregation of brineflow by proposed brine interceptors and the last one concerned the diversion of downstream sewage flow from Plant Number 2 to Plant Number 1. The baseline (no action) alternative was discussed and its potential effects on the Green Acres . Project and the WF 21 were also evaluated. All of these aftematives are proposed to divert brine from Plant Number 1 treatment system to Improve the quality of the effluent which In turn would improve the quality of the reclaimed water to be produced from this effluent. A cost comparison of the alternatives indicated that the interplant diversion alternative has the lowest present worth cost. Re-routing of the Plant Number 1 waste sidestreams and the Water Factory 21 brine are recommended to Improve the quality of the effluent wastewater. v The interplant diversion altemative is the recommended routing altemative because of lower cost. This will require a modification to the CSDOC Master Plan. A source control program outline is also suggested regarding the sampling, quality goals and quantity limit of existing and potential brineflows. It is also recommended that the Irvine Brineline be constructed as a wastewater quality improvement project. r 7-3 J W W iJ W li >J U I � , j U I� i ! Id W J APPENDICES , I J APPENDIX A REFERENCE MATERIAL r Bill Dandy&Associates; Krieger&Steward, Inc., February 1982. "Alignment Study for Santa Ana Regional Interceptor Reach IV-D and E"-prepared for SAWPA. California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region, April 1991. 'Upper Santa Ana River Watershed Nitrogen&TDS Studies-Staff responses.' YY California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region, November 1991. 'Proposed Basin Plan Amendment - Revised Waste Load Allocation for Total Inorganic Nitrogen in •+ POTW Effluent Discharge to the Santa Ana River and Its tributary." California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region, November 1991.'Dratt a, Water Quality Assessment for Santa Ana Region.' California Department of Health Services. "Inland Surface Waters Plan." County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (CSDOC), February 1989. "Collection,Treatment, and Disposal Facilities Master Plan -Volume 1, Summary Report.' ., CSDOC, February 1989. "Collection,Treatment, and Disposal Facilities Master Plan-Volume 2, Joint Works Treatment and Proposed Facilities! CSDOC, February 1989. "Collection,Treatment, and Disposal Facilities Master Plan- Hydraulic Model Schematics." CSDOC, 1989. "Annual Report- Engineering and Operation,Volume 1 of 3." r CSDOC, 1990. "Annual Report- Planning, Construction,Operation and Programs,Volume 1 CSDOC, 1991. "Annual Report Excepts-Wastewater Quality Data." CSDOC, September 1987. "Action Plan for Balanced Environmental Management." CSDOC, June 1990. "Wastewater and Environmental Management for Orange County." CSDOC, "M&D Structure Schematics .3 sheets." r CSDOC, "Stringfellow Average Annual Discharge 12/85-6/90, Summary Report.' CSDOC, "Flow data of Plant 1 and Plant 2 for July&August 1991' CSDOC, "Extracts from Conservation, Reclamation and Reuse Committee minutes for Feb., March, and April regarding proposed water reclamation plants." CSDOC, "Discharge Data Report-SARI at Green River, 2/88 .8/91'-CSDOC Source Control Division. r CSDOC and Chino Basin Municipal Water District, October 1958. 'Wastewater Interceptor Capacity Agreement." .. CSDOC and Orange County Water District, "Forebay WRP Feasibility Study- Draft Report.' James M. Montgomery Consulting Engineers,July 1990. "Nitrogen and TDS Studies Santa Ana River Watershed" - prepared for Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority. MacDonald-Stephen Engineers, Inc., July 1991. "La Palma Water Reclamation Feasibility Study"-prepared for Orange County Water District and CSDOC. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, June 1991. 'Brackish Groundwater Study' r prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation. Orange County Water District (OCWD), May 1990. 'Irvine Desalter Facility Plan and Project Report." OCWD, March 1991. "Engineer's Report for the Tustin Desalter Project." OCWD, 1990-1991. "Annual Report" OCWD, 1990. "Engineer's Report." OCWD, 1991. "Engineer's Report." OCWD, 1991. 'Table-Water Treatment Projects Providing Brine Waste to CSDOC Sewer.' ,., prepared by Jim Reilly. OCWD, August 1991. "Location maps,Water Quality results of Tustin Desalter and Tustin e. Nitrate Removal Plant" OCWD, 1991. "Water Quality Analysis of Water Factory 21 Q-1 for October„November and December, 1991." r OCWD, "Groundwater Management Plan"- 1991 Update. OCWD, June 1991. "Water Reclamation Requirements- Order No. 9146."-issued by California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region. OCWD, "Water Factory 21 0-1 Influent-Conductivity, TDS data from 1989.1991.' OCWD, "Water Factory 21 0-1 Influent-Influent Nitrogen Profile of 1987-1991." ,. OCWD, "1990-91 Engineer's Report," February 1992. Toups Corporation, April 1976. "Amended Project Report for the SARI."-prepared for SAWPA. .. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), "Letter to CSDOC dated March 2,1984 regarding influent sampling/waste sidestreams recycling Issues.' USEPA, "Letter dated May 2, 1985 to CSDOC regarding waste sidestreams recycling issues.' Willdan Associates, October 1989. "SAWPA Santa Ana River Interceptor Reach IV-D and E Preliminary Design Report."- prepared for SAWPA. Communications CSDOC's memo, Susan Bradford to Blake Anderson, October 8 and 15 1991. 'Plant No. 1 Filter Press Filtrate Quality.' m CSDOC's memo, Greg Pamson to Bob Ooten,July 18, 1991. "Rise in Ammonia Concentrations and decrease in influent flow." SAWPA's memo, "Status Report on Chino Desalting System." no. 1141. r Boyle's memo, David Philip to Bill Everest, September 1991. "Telephone contact with Bill Dandy r, regarding SARI flow and load projections." r m r V s r d L�1 W ri W I W 7 � W id APPENDIX B v WASTEWATER QUALITY DATA " i b.l W it V r W [ l t l [ l ( t [ l [ l 1 I [ [ 1 1 [ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY f ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Wastewater Quality, Diversion and Trestment Study TWO A•1 Sunitary of Water Quality Infolt etion - &IRI f STRINGFELLOW ................................................................................ ............................. SARI STRINGFELLOW ............ ......... ......................................................... ........................... Prado OC Line Green River Breen River 90M 9/91 1991 1990 1989 1988 86.90 An 8/91 CSDOC Party ter Unit (1) (2) (3) (3) (3) (3) (4) IS) LIMITS ............ ......... ......... ......... .................. .................. ........................... TDS aw/L 2060 --- --- ... ... ... conductivity ulho ... --- ... ••• --- PN units 7 6.9 ••• ••• --• PCB me/L ND ••• ••• •.• ••• Pesticide M/L ND --- ••• ••• --- TSS mg/L 592 592 520 ••• --- ... BCD mg/L 615 615 435 --- .-- --- CSC mg/L <25 <25 6.7 --- --- --- As RN/L --- ..• --. •-• --- ND 2 AS om/L <.02 <.02 --- <.03 ND NO 5 Cd ng/L <.02 <.02 <.02 <.02 .013 ND 1 Cr ng/L <.03 <.03 <.03 .04 .019 NO 2 Cu ag/L .15 .15 .21 .31 .a09 ND 3 NN3 a0/L 15.5 11.7 11.7 18.7 31.9 --- ... --- Ni ag/L <.03 <.03 <.03 .07 .008 ND 10 N9 a9/L ... --- --- --- -- a .03 Pb ag/L <,03 <.03 <.1 .11 .007 NO 2 2n mg/L .18 .18 .28 .5 .008 :oil 10 Cyanide am/L --- --- ... •-• -- .011 5 Total Toxic orpanies a0/L •-- --- --- --- .004 NO .58 -------------------------------- --------- ------------------ ------------------ ............................. Sources: Updated: 3-24-92 (1) Water Resources Report, August 1991. OM. Sanpli ng at Trade Den. WQSARI (2) Stapling Report. 9/13/91. OCWD. Stapling at OC Line. (3) Stapling Reports from Green River Station, 1988-1991. CSDOC (4) Sumnry Report, 11/01/90. SAWA. (5) Discharge Report, August 1991. SAWA [ I i t . ( ( 1 ( l [ ( [ l 1 1 [ l [ 1 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY 8 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Wastewater Duality, Diversion and Treatment Study Table A-2 Summary of Water Duality Information - CSDOC Trunkli:e Sampling Results ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) Cagmted Sampling Sampling EC (ud:o/cN ISM (mg/L) INS (ng/U IDS (ng/L) IDS Location Date An. Range Avg. Range Avg. Range Avg. Range (ng/L) -------------------- ------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ ------------ Carbon Camon ----- --------- MILter/La Pane 9/91 --- --- 50 17-66 154 79-206 1572 1350-1800 --- Niller/Niralamn 9/91 --- ... 13 7-16 117 76.216 1557 1280.1800 ... Rose/Palm 9191 --- --- 33 30-37 165 134-214 1209 10DO-1600 ... Kra eanr/Yorba Linda 9/91 --- --- 39 30-45 188 130-276 1491 1120-2000 --- Ymrbe Linda Pump Ste 9/91 --- --- 108 74-154 241 168-364 1626 1400-1800 --- Plant 3 ....-------- Nagnolia/La Palma 10/91 --- --- 36 34-38 --- --- 1740 1440-2300 --- Euclid/Wemt 10/91 --- --- 39 37-43 --- --- 1157 820-1770 ... Euclid/East 10/91 --- --- 41 38-45 ... --- 1362 996-2020 --- S. Col/Orangetho:pe 10/91 --- --- 16 11-20 --- --- 925 M-1430 --- Plant 1 Trur*s ................ SARI 11/91 2407 2100-2833 --- --- ... --- 1583 1269-2021 --- Talbert 11/91 1634 1500-1500 --- --- --- --- 1D61 990-11" --- SARI 85-86 2656 170D-4500 45.3 26-61 --- ... ... --- 1726 TALBERT 85-86 1517 1200-2200 22.2 17-28 --- --- --- --- 986 EUCLID 85-86 1614 600-2100 20.1 17-24 --- --- --- --- 1049 NEWHOPE 85-86 1955 1600-2500 20.3 17-24 --- --- ... ... 1271 SUNFLOWER 85-86 2298 1500-38M 21.8 15-31 --- --- --- --- 14% AIRBASE 85-86 1159 600-2200 34.5 27-57 --- --- --- ... 753 SARI 1/92 2113 16OD-2400 37 32-42 --- --- --- --- 1373 TALBERT 1/92 1614 ISM-1700 44 35.52 --- --- ... ... 1050 EUCLID 1/92 1S37 1700-2000 37 34-46 -- --- --- ... 1194 NEWHOPE 1/92 2042 1700-2200 39 36-43 ... --- --- --- 1327 SUNFLOWER 1/92 1929 1700-2000 48 36-56 --- --- --- --- 1254 AIRBASE 1/92 1900 1700-2200 37 34.42 ... --- --- ... 1235 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes: (1) TOS/EC Ratio of 0.65 applied. Updated: 3.24-92 =IBM [ 1 1 [ l 1 1 t 1 1 [ [ t 1 t 1 [ 1 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY B ORANGE COUNTY LATER DISTRICT Wastewater Duality, Diversion and Tree Study Table A3 Summary of Water Quality Information - CSDOC Plants ................................................................................................................................................................... Plant Number 1 Plant Number 2 ...................... ................................................................................... ....................................................... Influent T.F. Effluent A.S. Effluent Influent A.S. Effluent Average Average Average Average Average 1989 1990 1991 1989 1990 1991 19B9 1990 1991 1989 1990 1991 1989 1990 1991 Parameter Unit (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) IS) (1) (2) (3) (1) (2) IS) (1) (2) (3) ............ ......... ........................... ........................... ........................... ........................... ........................... TDSmg/L ... ... ... ... ... ... ... -.- --. ... ... ... .. ... ... MCOuct lvity uNio .-. .-- --- -.- --- --- .-- ... ... ___ . TSS mg/L 225 223 228 31 43 39 6.8 7.2 5.5 230 251 244 22 14 15 TM mg/L 34 30 34 39 40 35 17 21 23 37 37 39 28 24 25 NH3 ea/L 21 20 21 32 32 27 15 18 19 25 23 23 23 20 20 PH units 7.6 7.6 7.5 7.9 7.9 7.9 --- --- --- 7.5 7.5 7.6 --- --- --- Turbidity NTU --- --- ... 22 21 23 3.1 2.8 2.7 --- --- --- 8.4 5.1 6 PCB ug/L 80 NO 80 ... ... --- .-- --- --- 80 NO 80 --- --- --- Pesticides u9/L 80 .11 80 ... ... --- --- --- --- 80 .13 80 --- --- ... BOD M/L 230 240 250 ... --- --- --- --- --- 240 240 250 .-- --- --- cow mg/L --- --- --- 26 25 27 3.5 4.8 4.8 --- --- --- 11.8 <7.0 7.2 DSc mg/L 46.6 42.1 44.9 3.5 6.1 5.1 <2.5 <2.5 1 47.9 60.7 59.1 3 <2.5 1.9 As u9/L ... ... ... -.. ... ... ... ... AS ug/L 19 21 23 9 10 12 4 3 4 16 17 1B 7 4 4 Cd ug/L a 5.1 5.1 4 2.1 3.1 3 1.6 2 7 3.8 4.2 2 <,7 .8 Cr ug/L 51 35 28 17 12 11 11 5 4 41 25 21 11 4 3 Cu ug/L 216 162 156 76 67 68 30 13 15 184 150 153 28 12 1B Ni ug/L 60 44 49 40 30 34 30 23 27 40 35 30 20 16 19 Ngug/L --- --- ... ... ... --- ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Pb ug/L 40 24 18 10 9 5 10 4 2 40 23 13 10 <5 1 Zn ug/L 170 157 174 70 69 78 50 49 50 160 145 159 40 45 34 .................................................................................................................................................................... Sources: Updated: 3-24-92 (1) Amuel Report, 1909. CSDOC vgplantl (2) Anneal Report, 1990. CSDOC (3) Annual Report, 1991. CSDOC COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY d ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Wastewater Quality, Diversion and Treatment Study Table A•4 Summary of Water Quality Information - CSDOC Nitrogen CSDOC(1) ........................................................................ ................................................................... TKN, mg/L 1013-10, mg/L .............................................................. ................................................................... Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 1 Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 1 Date ------------------------------ ------------------ Filter Press .............................. ..---.................. Filter Press Inf. T.F. Eff. A.S. Elf. Inf. A.S. Eff. Filtrate Inf. T.F. Eff. A.S. Eff. Inf. A.S. Eff. Filtrate ......... .............................. .................. ............ .............................. ....................... ............ Jul•N 36 33 14 36 24 19 29 12 25 23 AUO.88 30 40 14 41 28 20 39 13 26 25 Sep•88 36 30 22 34 22 18 28 16 23 21 Oct-88 35 37 27 40 26 22 33 21 26 22 Ww-88 31 ... 19 40 30 22 39 24 26 23 DW-88 32 42 24 38 28 21 31 20 26 23 Jan-89 38 48 24 38 30 24 37 20 25 23 Feb-89 36 42 20 37 30 21 39 16 26 26 Mar-89 36 50 6.8 36 29 20 31 6.7 25 25 Apr•89 34 24 3.2 30 35 20 21 1 25 24 May-89 34 48 13 40 26 21 26 6.8 24 22 Jun•89 34 32 21 39 25 20 30 19 25 21 Jul-89 32 44 16 42 26 20 30 16 26 22 Aug-89 32 30 16 42 21 19 26 13 23 20 Sp-89 34 55 21 35 22 17 24 14 22 20 Oct-89 29 30 19 36 22 19 27 13 23 20 Nov-89 30 34 17 33 21 21 30 16 23 20 Dec-89 29 SB 21 36 27 21 41 1B 22 20 Jan-90 33 45 22 38 25 22 36 20 24 20 Feb-90 27 40 22 36 24 21 39 20 22 20 Mar•90 26 42 23 34 24 20 35 20 22 21 Apr-90 28 42 26 38 26 19 36 24 24 22 May-90 28 33 26 36 24 20 28 23 23 20 Jun-90 34 32 20 36 24 19 30 18 21 19 Jul-90 33 48 ib 36 22 18 37 14 21 18 AW-90 28 37 16 36 25 19 29 12 22 19 Sp-90 31 28 22 38 26 19 23 18 24 Inf. 21 Oct-90 32 31 21 38 24 19 26 1B 22 (4) 20 Nov90 32 40 23 38 25 19 33 111 23 22.9 19 Dec-90 34 36 26 38 26 20 30 22 22 22.4 20 Jan-91 38 48 27 40 26 20 34 22 23 22.9 20 Feb-91 36 38 26 41 25 (2) 22 31 20 23 23.3 21 (3) Mar-91 37 37 26 43 26 4SO 22 24 20 24 23.7 21 3" Apr-91 38 26 28 42 26 430 22 19 22 24 24.4 20 390 May-91 36 26 24 40 24 22 18 23 24 24.2 21 Jun-91 37 26 26 40 26 24 19 24 24 24.1 21 ........................................................................ ................................................................... Sourcaes (1) A.I. Report. 1999, 1990 d 1991. CWM Updated: 3.24.92 (2) Range of Results for Mar - Apr 91. CSOOC wgcsclmn (3) Average of Raw Its for Mar - Apr 91. CSDOC (4) Internal memo, Greg Pem w to Bob Ooten, July 18, 1991. CSDOC se COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY b - ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Wastewater Quality, Diversion and Treatment Stutly Table A-5 Sumaary of Water Quality Information - WF21 Influent Nitrogen, TOE b Conductivity .......................................................................................................... r OCUD WF21 Influent .......................................................................................................... Date TEN IN NW TOE Conductivity mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L unho/cm3 ......... .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. r Jan-87 Plant Down . .. .. Feb-87 Plant Dawn . Apr-87 12 12.1 .1 Apr-87 13 1 . .2 r Nay87 15.3 15 .1 174 Jun-87 7 17 10 Jul-87 Plant Dam --- Aup-87 4.3 11. 17 Sap-87 4.5 13.3 7 we Oct-87 L10 11.3 1.3 Nov87 10 14.9 1.3 Dec... 14.7 14.9 .2 r Jan•88 17.8 17.9 .1 F0.88 19 19.1 .1 Mar-88 18.6 18.8 .2 Apr-8B 17.8 18.1 .3 McY-88 22 22.2 .2 Jun•88 16.4 16.6 .2 Jul-88 13.3 13.5 .2 Aug-8B 12.2 12.7 .5 Sep'BB 14 14.4 .4 ,r Oct-BB 21.7 22 .3 Nov-88 24 24.1 .1 Dec-88 22.9 23.4 .5 .......................................................................................................... Jan-89 24.7 24.9 .2 ... 1549 Feb-89 Plant Dam ... --- .-- 1530 Mar-89 Plant Dan --- ... -•• ... Apr-89 2.8 24.3 21.5 --- 1577 May-89 9 23.5 14.5 PRO 1519 we Jun-89 20.3 20.4 .1 945 16M Jul-89 19.5 19.6 .1 934 1566 Aug-89 18.8 19.5 .7 '957 1612 Sep-89 Plant Down --- ... •-- 1605 Oct-89 19 19.3 .3 --- 1499 Nov-89 17 17.1 .1 886 1438 Dec-89 20.3 20.4 .1 922 1604 ........................................................................... .________........_. Jan-90 22.2 22.3 .1 1033 1763 Feb-90 21.5 21.6 .1 1019 1714 Nar-90 25.7 25.8 .1 982 1730 Apr-90 32.3 32.4 .1 1003 1757 May-90 36.2 37.2 1 1024 1830 Jun-" 25.5 26.7 1.2 1033 1748 yr Jul.90 27 34 7 953 1582 Aug-90 18 28 10 1050 1589 Sep-90 20.7 26.3 5.6 1120 1732 Oct-90 25 25.8 .8 1089 1732 we Nov.90 22.3 24.1 1.8 1066 1768 Oec-90 2D 20.7 .7 1200 1798 ........................................................................... Jan-91 29 29.3 .3 1100 19D9 Feb-91 28.3 29 .7 1177 2051 Mar-91 29.5 30.6 1.1 1100 2074 Apr-91 31 35.9 4.9 1220 2142 May91 31.1 32.3 .5 1170 2122 Jun-91 36.7 37.2 .5 MO 2037 we Jul-91 Plant Down --- ... ... ... Aug-91 1145 2028 Sep-91 1130 1989 -- Oct-91 21.9 ... 4.5 1213 2022 Nov-91 26.2 .-- 2.5 1260 2100 Dec-91 35.5 ... 2 1236 2063 ........................................................................................................... Updated: 3.24.92 r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY AND ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Table A-6 Summary of Flow Projections Tributary to CSDOC Service Area ................................-------------------- ..... ............ ................... SenateTPit to y Fear start % Prob- TPmce ct iree[M Brune Brine Brine Nuelity (1) Disco.ted r (mgtl) (NOT I Law) IDS I Tat N ....................................................................................................................................... OLLO WELLHEAD (ExcLWe TREATMENT PLANTS Bien) mN Tustin xItrata Removal 0 1990 100 RD .5 .09 .09 5520 84 DeaO Plant (ON LINE) I% .5 .02 .O2 32000 310 Tustin Desalter 0 1993 95 AO 2 .4 .4 9500 140 Irvine Desalter 0 TWA 95 RO/EDR 4.6 1.95 1.85 woo 61 Yxba LIMB Desalter- P1 S.A. Canyon I 75 RO/EDR 2 .4 .3 9600 M eas Garden Grave II Nitrate Aeauval Plant P2 2001 60 Ix 2 .04 .D2 800 no Westminster Nitrate nos 50 IN 1.5 .03 .02 we no `. Removal Plan[ P2 sea SPPOr Deselter P2 2005 50 RO/EDR 2 .35 .18 me 6 s WASTEWATER RECLAMATION PLANTS IN OW .. Anaheim foretay/ P1 1996 60 R0 16 2.88 1.n me in Le Palma r $eel Beaah P2 1996 40 RO 10 1.8 .72 5100 in -- Orange/N. Irvine 0 nos to RO 10 1.6 .15 T000 In ,d Crescent Basin P2 1995 100 NO 20 3.6 3.6 7000 123 RIMM' BASIN PUN ---------------------- .� OEULTERS-ALT.SC .................. SW Chim Deselter P1 1995 in RO/EOA 11.4 1.71 I.71 5900 73 BE Chino Deset Ur Pi 1995 100 RO/EOR 12.2 1.0 1.83 5900 73 r tiveralda-001[nn P1 I995 50 RO/EDR to 1.5 .75 5900 73 lareanl Pi 1995 50 M/EDR 16.9 2-54 1.3 5900 M ass Bunker Hill Pi 1995 50 RO/EDR 4.9 .74 .37 590D 73 B.ker Hill (3) P1 2000 50 IN 1 6.8 .4 .2 400 450 ............................... WASTEWATER RECLAMATION PUNTS --0r0udwa[er Recharge P1 RO Brim (COHS)(4) MIO 100 Re 40 6 6 5000 60 ................................................................................................................... ................... SAWA I I I I I ] I 7 2000 100 -- Arligton Deselter P1 199D to80 3.6 1.1 1.1 Sim M m If ... ... -- IMntrbl Brim, PI 1990 100 N/A 3 3 Dairy Wastes "t0 100 ..............................................................(6)-(])..............---.-.---......--------- ------------------- Notes: up0steei: 6-25-92 r (1) Tributary to Plant 1 (PIT, Plant 2 (Pb, or discharge to seem throno the prapoaW Irvine Brineljne un. (2) Brim flow discaattet accerdirg to projeet probability. it.. (A Brackish DrermelWater ROCINNS ins Study, 1991. RWOSC, Boyle. (4) Ass.e 50 Had will OP mast M BO%for grarRlater reehame, of flow requires treatment am! M FAR 0% recovery. (5) Ft. projections given by Bil! 0-*, SAWA foresee o0o uLtant. m (6) Ion exchame panes. ..mess to he me SOL .ter resewry aM 9M nitrrte rejection .is. (]) RO/EDR processes Unme to have 11511 Water recovery, M TOS rejection Plus LESS nitrate rejection, eAcept Irvine, Water recovery eatiotM et M Arlington, Water recovery mmrtN at TlS. Wad COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY & ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Wastewater Quality, Treatment and Diversion Study Table A-7 Brine Loading Projections Tributary to Plant 1 envelope Updated: 7-6-92 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Flow, mgd (1) --------------------------------------------- --------- ------------------ 1. Current Flow (2) ,., - Industrial Brine 3 - Arlington Desalter 1.1 --------------------------------------------- --------- ------------------ Subtotal 4.1 --------------------------------------------- --------- ------------------ 2. OCWD Wellhead Project m - Yorba Linda Desalter .3 --------------------------------------------- --------- ------------------ Sutotal .3 --------------------------------------------- --------- ------------------ 3. Wastewater Reclamation Plants In OCWD - Anaheim Forebay/La Palma 1.73 --------------------------------------------- --------- ------------------ .. Sutotal 1.73 ----------------------------- --------- ------------------ m 4. SAWPA Desalters - SW Chino Desalter 1.71 - SE Chino Desalter 1.83 ,d - Riverside/Colton .75 - Temescal Desalter 1.3 - Bunker Hill Desalter .37 - Bunker Hill Nitrate Removal .2 --------------------------------------------- --------- ------------------ Sutotal 6.2 --------------------------------------------- --------- ------------------ 5. SAWPA - Industrial Brine & Dairy Wastes 7 - Groundwater Recharge r, Assume 50 mgd diverted, 80% RO treatment with 15% reject flow 6 --------------------------------------------- --------- ------------------ Subtotal 13 --------------------------------------------- --------- ------------------ TOTAL 25.3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CO(INTY AND ORANGE COUNTY PATER DISTRICT r WaeteRBter Quality, Divarsian AM Treatment Study Table A-8 Water Quality coaparlaon of RAN Water Supply, Wastewater Treetmmt FloM Effluent and Source Control Regulatlona ----••---------------------------------------•-•-----...............-----...............----------.........------......-------- RAN Water Source Ca w"t ....... ........................ OCWU City of LA Colorado State City of Raalafead NF 21 Hyperion COirtituent unit River Water L.A. ca slater awtity Influent Secordary <1) (2) (A (4) Curls (5) (6) Effluent (7) ............... ............ ........................ ........................ .............. ............... ...."--------- Gen. Physical r ............. EC uNhO/cn 948 663.8 750-2500 (1938) 10" TDS ag/L 610 368.8 1260 (6%> PH wit 8.35 8.13 5.5-11 4.5.9 7.4 Total AIR. mg/L 128 89 92-519 2112 216 r Total Hardness NAGA 298 147 362 207 MBAs ma/L ••• ••• .53 .17 COD ffwL •-- ••• 42 ••• TDC mg/L •-- --- 13.9 ... Susp• Solids DNA --• --- 5.3 11 Color wit ••• ••• 35 ••- Terry. F ... ••• 140 •-- Cyanfde(T) an/L •.. --- 10 5 8.8 ••- Cyonfde(F) M/L ••• •-• 2 ••• y D. Sulfide MIL ••. .•• 1 •-- T. Texic Organics ORA ••• ... .58 ... Oil 8 Grease mg/L ••• ... 600 ••- ............... ............ ........................ ........................ .............. ............... ............... r Gen. Mirmrals --------------- Boron e9/L .23 .27 .75 1.9 .74 Caloium eC/L 71.7 29.5 97 54 Magnasiva M/L 28.8 17.8 29 17 r Potassim NSA 4.4 4 20 11.2 swim mg/L 90.7 74.5 271 12B SILICA mg/L 9.9 11.5 18 23.5 chloride ap/L 76 103 142.355 392 143 Fluoride eGA .31 .14 1 .64 .67 Nltrete•N eaWL .48 1 5.30 2.5 1.4 Sulfate M/L 250 73 316 142 Anmonfa-H A8/L ... --- 5.30 24.6 11.2 Ore.-N mg/L --- --- 1.8 1.8 TI01 mg/L ••• --- 26.2 ••• --------------• ............ ........................ ..............--------.. .............. ---............ ............... Trace Metals ------ie ---- us/L 73.7 167.8 5000 215 360 Mn ug/L 9.7 17.5 200 59 58 Ag uo/L ND RD 5 5 --- 4.4 .5 Al ug/L 61.3 74.5 5000 45 Ica As ug/L 2.7 2 3 2 Ica <5 5 So w/L 154 45.5 --- 60 50 Be ug/L ••• --- 100 Q ... Cd ug/L MD w 15 1 10 1.8 10 Co ug/L --- --- ... ... 50 q ••- Cr W/L NO ND 10 2 100 2.1 20 Cu ug/L 13.7 ND 15 3 200 25 10 Ng ug/L NO ND -- .03 --- 4.5 1 - Ni ug/L •-- --- 12 10 200 33 37 Pb u9/L w No 5 2 5000 s1 33 Se ug/L 2 ND --- -- 20 e5 1 2n ug/L NO ND 25 10 2000 62 38 ---------------------------------------------------------- .................................................................... (1) 1989-IWO Avera9A. updated; 7-6-92 (2) 1989-1990 Average. Scurce.cel (3) City of Los Angeles Pretrestmsnt Requirements, June 1983. (4) CSDOC Wastewater Discharge RegulatlArS, Sept. 1969. (5) ENcerpts from PRC/JMM Report for OCWD, Sept. 1981. (6) OCR, Water Factory 21 Influent, Nov. 1991. (7) 1988 Average. ( ) Calculated Value usiM TDS/EC Ratio of 0.65. e� W CWNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE Cm1NTY 8 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT Table A-9 Brine end wastewater Duality Projection ................................................................................................................................................................ COOC Raw Water Quality IIDDC 'a" fft ffod Perennial I (6Nmonth Median) I Source trot I --Irvim(1)-..Twtln(2) Arlington(3) Average I Guslllne4) 1199gUality nt 1.9(w)b-1s333mgdl (GIN)2307 ............................................................................................................................................................. ("IL) TDS --- --- 1442 1530 11D6 1366 E42403 (5) (12001 1664 1667 Total Nitrogen ... .-- 61 140 89 96 1871 (6) --- ... --- Anamnla-M 30 ... ... --- --- --- C63) (7) 24 (8) 30 30 ....................................................................._______.............................................................................. Cadmfun .02 1 .0004 .001 .005 .CD2i .0105 .0012 .0022 .0023 Chronim .1 2 .0016 .009 .0012 .0039 .0195 .0065 .008 .DOB Copper .3 3 .0028 .014 .0247 .0138 .069 .044 .047 .047 Lead .1 2 (.001) (.001) (.001) (.001) .005 .0025 .0028 .0028 Mercury .001 .03 (.0005) (.0005) (.0005) (.0005) .0025 .0002 .00045 .00046 Nickel .1 10 (.03) .04 (.03) .033 .165 .024 .04 .04 Silver .03 5 .0003 (.0001) (.0001) .00017 .00085 .0075 .007 .007 Zinc .3 10 .047 .015 .05 .037 .185 .056 .07 .07 Arsenic .01 2 (.005) (.005) (.005) (.005) .025 .002 .0045 .0046 ................................................................................................................................................................ Noteet ( ) Detection limit sesuned. Updated: 7.6.92 ( 1 Previously determined. A-9 (1) Irvire Oesalter Project Report, OCND. (2) Tustin Deselter Project Report, DCWD. (3) Arlington Deealter Facility Plan and Project Report, SAWA. (4) Assunes NO process with 80% recovery and 98% salt/heavy metals rejection Brim concentration factor . S.C. (5) Table 5.3. (6) Table 5.3. (7) 1991 CSOOC influent ratio of T%N to NH3 • 0.72. (0) 1991 CSDOC canmined effluent ammonia-N concentration. (9) Masimm allowable brine flaw, G(b) = 60 ngd assunn non-SAWPA flaw = 333 sqd in the year 2010. (10) Minimm mn-SAWPA flow required, GIN) a 165 mgd, assures brirnflow, a 30 mgd before the year 2010, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ELLIS January 21 , 1993 1pBPC BOX01z27 ` FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92729-9127 n1n%2-2n1 STAFF REPORT Wastewater Quality. Treatment and Diversion Study BACKGROUND In the early 1970s, the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County (Districts) entered into agreements and permits with the Santa Ana Watershed Protection Agency (SAWPA) which were based on the mutual benefits to be achieved by the upper and lower Santa Ana River basins through the protection of the water quality in the Santa Ana River watershed. Orange County Water District (OCWD) is a member of SAWPA and implements many water quality improvement projects for protection of the Orange County groundwater basin. Through one of the agreements, SAWPA owns wastewater flow capacity of 30 million gallons per day (mgd) in the Districts' Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI). The SARI is tributary to Reclamation Plant No. 1 and has a capacity range from 30 mgd at the Riverside County line to 200 mgd at Plant No. 1. SAWPA currently discharges about 8 mgd into the SARI which has an average flow of 33 mgd at the Fountain Valley Reclamation Plant. SAWPA flow includes 15,000 to 35,000 gallons per day of treated water from the Stringfellow Waste Disposal site. (This treated water from Stringfellow meets the provisions of the Districts' industrial waste control ordinance and produces an effluent that exceeds the removal requirements for heavy metals and organics.) The capacity owned by SAWPA is intended for upper basin discharges that are high in total dissolved solids (TDS), generally salts (i.e., minerals) in solution. Upstream groundwater improvement projects (desalting) and water reclamation projects are planned which would primarily discharge to the SARI line. The brines and other discharges with high TDS would significantly increase the TDS concentration of wastewater tributary to the Districts' treatment plants. Most of these discharges are tributary to Reclamation Plant No. 1. Since the secondary effluent from Plant No. 1 is the source water for reclamation at the OCWD for the Green Acres Project (GAP) and Water Factory 21 (WF21), a high TDS problem is now foreseen because high TDS is a problem for water reclamation. The Districts' treatment processes do not remove TDS nor is TDS removal required for ocean discharge. The WF21 removes TDS using reverse osmosis but more energy is required as the TDS concentration increases, which increases water reclamation costs. The GAP process does not remove TDS. STUDY OBJECTIVES The Districts retained Boyle Engineering Corporation to conduct the Wastewater Quality, Treatment and Diversion Study to identify and recommend alternatives to insure high quality effluent water for Reclamation Plant No. 1. This study is included as an enclosure. Four major study objectives were: 1. To review brine quantity and quality from SARI and other trunk lines tributary to Reclamation No. 1. 2. To project flow and quality of other potential brine sources from the Upper Santa Ana Basin (conveyed by SARI) and other parts of Orange County (several desalting projects are now proposed in Orange County). Brine producers include industries, dairies, groundwater desalting projects, and wastewater reclamation projects both for irrigation or for groundwater recharge by spreading and Injection. 3. To evaluate various flow routing strategies. Investigate and estimate costs of new regional brine interceptors. Explore potential system diversion options between Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 to balance hydraulic loading as well as to improve effluent quality of Plant No. 1 for reclamation purposes. 4. To select the best strategy or combination of strategies regarding source control, flow routing, collection system and/or in-plant diversions. Recommendations would focus on minimizing the effects of increased brine flows on plant treatment processes, process equipment, WF21 influent quality and GAP effluent quality. STUDY SUMMARY Boyle achieved the objectives by evaluating the existing sewage conveyance and treatment system, assessing the wastewater quality, assessing the brine quantity and quality, analyzing alternatives routing strategies and making recommendations for the optimum solutions to ensure the highest quality treated water is available for reclamation at the OCWD facilities. The study was managed and coordinated by both the Districts and OCWD staff. _2_ `� Existina Conveyance and Treatment System The long range master plan provides for increasing the existing capacity of Plant No. 1 from 108 total mgd to 240 mgd plus standby; and Plant No. 2 from 186 total mgd to 240 mgd plus standby. Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley is fed by six influent interceptors plus a diversion pump station. The metering and diversion structure at Plant No. 1 is able to divert up to 100 mgd of influent to Plant No. 2. A pump station in Fountain Valley is able to divert up to 19 mgd of raw sewage from the Magnolia-Bushard Trunk tributary to Plant No. 2 to Plant No. 1. Other upstream diversions for the raw sewage are limited. If brine from the Upper Santa Ana River Basin or within the Districts' service area were to be segregated for disposal to Plant No. 2, a new brine interceptor other than the SARI would be needed because of capacity limitations in most of the influent interceptors. If the entire flow in the SARI line were to continue to be diverted to Plant No. 2, additional facilities for diversion of flow from the trunk lines tributary to Plant No. 2 would be needed to balance the flow between the two treatment facilities. Wastewater Quality Data Analysis All influent Interceptors tributary to Plant No. 1 were sampled for the study. Among the Plant No. 1 influent interceptors, the SARI was found to have the highest TDS concentrations. The parameters of TDS and nitrogen were identified as having the highest potential to impact water reclamation at the OCWD's WF21 and GAP. An Increase in the TDS concentration in the secondary effluent from Plant No. 1 was observed over a two-year period. Explanations for the Increase include water conservation, source water quality and increased Upper Basin groundwater rehabilitation projects. Brine Flow and Quality Analysis Existing and potential future brine sources were identified. The amount of brine flow tributary to Plant No. 1 is estimated to be about 30 mgd by the year 2010. OCWD is studying a dedicated brine line (Irvine Brine Line) which would convey brine from several desalters and reclamation plants in the eastern service area directly to the ocean through the Districts' interplant ocean outfall. -3- The projected TDS and total nitrogen concentration of flow in the SARI would be 1,840 milligrams per liter (mg/1) and 46 mg/l, respectively. The projected TDS and total nitrogen concentrations of the combined sewer flows tributary to Plant No. 1 (including SARI) would then be 1,584 mg/I and 42 mg/I, respectively. The water quality goal for reclaimable effluent is a concentration of 1,050 mg/I TDS and 30 mg/I total nitrogen. Brine Routina Analysis Five alternatives were considered for improving the effluent quality of Reclamation Plant No. 1. The baseline alternative, which is also known as the wastewater desalination alternative, would require no action by the Districts. OCWD would have to upgrade and expand its treatment plant to treat the effluent with higher TDS and nitrogen concentrations. Three new interceptor alternatives considered the construction of segregated brine lines (La Palma/Magnolia, Santa Ana River Parallel and Glassell/Grand) to convey brine flow to Plant No. 2, thus bypassing Plant No. 1. The interplant diversion alternative would continue the bypass of the entire SARI flow to Plant No. 2. Under this alternative, a new 40 mgd pump station and force main along Ellis Avenue would be needed to divert flow from the Knott Interceptor to Plant No. 1 in order to maintain a balanced flow to both treatment plants. COMPARISON OF COSTS OF ROUTING ALTERNATIVES Capital O&M Present Cost Cost Worth Alternatives IS million) (S million) (S million) 1. La Palma/Magnolia Route 55.0 --- 55.0 (CSD) 2. Santa Ana River Route 33.2 --- 33.2 (CSD) 3. Glassell/Grand Route (CSD) 44.4 --- 44.4 4. Interplant Diversion (CSD) 8.1 0.5 14.4 5. Wastewater Desalination 10.0 2.5 40.5 (OCWD) -4- 1 Study Recommendations an l i s �.. The interplant diversion alternative is the recommended routing option because of its lower capital and present worth cost. Under this alternative, all brine flows tributary to Plant No. 1, except those to be handled by the proposed Irvine Brine Line, would be conveyed by the SARI and then diverted to Plant No. 2. It is also recommended that the filter press filtrate/washwater be diverted to Plant No. 2 and that the WF21 brine discharge to the interplant ocean outfall be continued. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Districts receive and file the staff report and Wastewater Quality, Treatment and Diversion Study, and direct staff to proceed with the necessary planning and scheduling activities; and that staff be authorized to discuss with the Orange County Water District, and other affected parties, the planning and funding of the future design and construction of the preferred alternative, a new 40 mgd pump station and force main along Ellis Avenue to divert flow from the Knott Interceptor tributary to Plant No. 2 to insure high quality effluent at Plant No. 1. During the planning stage, the project should be presented to the Cities of Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach for review and scheduling, and the 1989 Master Plan should be amended. At a later date, authority for design and construction would be requested if it is determined that the project should go forward. %w.o Cc Q720�WASE R.m 5- i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS el ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA ilB ELUS AVENUE GU eox 8127 E01Nram VALI.Er.uuroHNIA 82721.8127 tun 962 11 January 21, 1993 STAFF REPORT FUEL CELL TECHNOLOGY AS A POTENTIAL ENERGY SOURCE AND AIR POLLUTION CONTROL STRATEGY 1) Background and Summary At the last Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee meeting, Director Wedaa inquired as to the potential use of fuel cell technology at the Districts. He asked if fuel cells are a viable alternative to the Districts for meeting their energy requirements and achieving our air basin's air quality objectives. Director Wedaa informed the Committee that the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the Gas Company are promoting the commercial use of fuel cells in the South Coast Air Basin. The Gas Company is providing small (200 kW) natural gas fuel cell power plants for up to ten commercial or industrial firms for the production of electric power. Utilizing natural gas, these "turn key" plants will be located at various firms and operated by the �s Gas Company. The firm will pay the Gas Company a fee for use of the electricity produced by the fuel cell. The Committee directed Staff to investigate this emerging issue and report back to the Committee. Staff has conducted an initial evaluation of the potential use and benefit of fuel cells at our facilities and has held preliminary discussions with the only manufacturer of commercially available fuel cells in the United States and with the Gas Company. The purpose of this staff report is to describe fuel cells, to discuss their potential value to the Districts, and provide a recommendation to use one of the Gas Company's fuel cells on-site, and to monitor fuel cell research that will be conducted by EPA and the City of Baltimore. 2) Fuel Cell Technology Fuel cells operate like a wet-cell battery, such as the one found in automobiles, except that gases rather than liquids are used in the galvanic action that produces the electric power. In the case of the space program, hydrogen and oxygen are combined to produce energy and water. In the case of commercial and industrial fuel cells, natural gas and air are used. In both systems, no combustion takes place. It's the chemical reaction of the two gases that produces energy. f Staff Report Fuel Cell Technology as a Potential Energy Source and Air Pollution Control Strategy January 21, 1993 The principles of fuel cell technology have been known for approximately one hundred years. Its first practical application began in the 1960s with the advent of the Apollo-manned space program which utilized inboard fuel cells for producing electric power and water for the extended periods necessary to sustain a manned-space vehicle in deep space. Fuel cells were selected because they required little maintenance, were very fuel efficient, and relatively compact compared to other power plants. They were, however, extremely expensive to construct and operate, and could not produce large amounts of energy. The commercial and industrial application of fuel cells large enough to provide sufficient energy to make them practical is still in the development stage. In the United States, there is only one company providing fuel cells to the Gas Company. Prior to 1990, there were fewer than 150 prototype units manufactured and tested around the United States. Today, this company, International Fuel Cells (IFC) of South Windsor, Connecticut, is producing 200 kilowatt units (200 kilowatts is approximately equivalent to the peak power demand of 200 households) for approximately a dozen United States and a dozen international customers. Most of their customers are gas and/or electric utilities who are interested in extending this cutting-edge technology to practical day-to-day applications. 3) Fuel Cells and the Districts The key question for the Districts to consider, is whether this technology holds promise for our long term facilities construction and operating strategy. Can this technology fit in with our existing master plan (or should our master plan be modified) and meet our obligations to operate efficiently and reliably? Can fuel cells also help us achieve our clean air goals? As you might expect, the answers to these questions are not easy — at least not for the immediate future. First, the Districts are on the threshold of operating two central power generation facilities at our Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach wastewater treatment plants that use state-of-the-art internal combustion reciprocating engines. Having useful lives of approximately 20 years, and costing $67 million, these new power plants are currently our significant investment in future electric energy recovery and clean air requirements. These facilities will utilize digester gas which is a by-product of our wastewater sludge treatment process. The methane gas contained in our digester gas will be used as fuel for these new engines which are guaranteed by their manufacturer to achieve the stringent air emission requirements of the SCAQMD -2- \./ Staff Report Fuel Cell Technology as a Potential Energy Source and Air Pollution Control Strategy January 21, 1993 through the year 2004. In 2004, potentially more stringent air quality standards will be established and it is unknown at this time if the engines could meet those more stringent standards without additional emission controls being installed. Therefore, as a practical matter, we are already committed to a long-term program of energy recovery using these new and expensive facilities. Secondly, fuel cell technology is not yet proven as a long-term, cost effective and reliable source of energy. It appears to be very promising, but it remains only that, a promise. Most observers will tell you that its wide-spread practical application is at least a decade away. Third, the cost of fuel cell technology is not competitive with today's electrical costs. The Districts currently pay an average of approximately 8 cents-per-kilowatt-hour. The projected cost to generate power from our Central Power Generation System is between 4 and 51k cents-per-kilowatt-hour. The true cost of electricity produced by fuel cell technology ranges from 12 to 20 cents-per-kilowatt-hour. This cost differential makes its widespread application uneconomical at this time . However, as production of fuel cell units reach higher quantities and improvements are made, the cost will undoubtedly drop. Also, the Gas Company, as part of its marketing strategy for their demonstration units, will subsidize a portion of this we cost by charging less than the prevailing Edison Company equivalent price for the electricity produced by the Gas Company units. Therefore, for the next 10 to 20 years, the use of fuel cell technology to meet the Districts' primary energy needs appears to be unrealistic. Nevertheless, a set of questions remain to be answered. Should the Districts actively participate in the research and application of this technology in wastewater treatment plants? Can we facilitate the development of this technology if we support research projects? As air quality regulations become more stringent and as our new engines age and eventually wear out, is fuel cell technology our future answer? 4) Fuel Cell Research Utilizing_Natural Gas If only natural gas is to be used in the fuel cells in our facilities, then our early involvement in their use and testing will provide no significant advantage in advancing this technology. Whether they are operated to support an administration building for us or a corporate headquarters someplace else, will make little technical difference. -3- i Staff Report Fuel Cell Technology as a Potential Energy Source and Air Pollution Control Strategy January 21, 1993 However, there are other benefits to the Districts, including improved public relations, improved relationship with SCAQMD, beginning of the fuel cell application learning annex, and "bargain" electricity prices. The Gas Company has indicated to Districts' Staff a 200 kilowatt fuel cell may be available for the Districts early 1994. The Gas Company would install and operate the 200 kilowatt natural gas fuel cell power plant and would pay for all engineering, project management and construction costs to set up and connect the fuel cell. The Districts would pay only 95% of the equivalent Edison Company cost for the electricity generated by the fuel cell, but may be obligated to later purchase of the fuel cell from the Gas Company. Staff is currently evaluating potential in-plant candidate uses for the fuel cell. If the program is approved by the Directors, staff expects to report details of such a project back to the Committee, including the selected site or sites for the fuel cell, costs to the Districts, and the contractual requirements with the Gas Company when they become defined. 5) Fuel Cell Research Utilizing Digester Gas If digester gas were to be used in our fuel cells, then our active participation in the early research and application of fuel cell technology could be of significant value to its development. Digester gas and landfill gas are both being actively proposed as candidates for fuel cells. There is a tremendous quantity of digester gas produced in the United States. Districts' Staff estimates that approximately 200,000,000 cubic feet of digester gas is produced daily. Fortunately, this is an energy source that is being tapped today by nearly all large wastewater treatment plants by using this fuel in boilers and engines. However, as future air quality regulations became more stringent, today's energy recovery technology may be unable to meet the new standards. Fuel cells hold the promise of being capable of achieving very stringent air quality standards because they don't depend upon combustion to produce energy. This advantage may become very important as the various air quality nonattainment regions of the country begin to grapple with the problem of deteriorating air quality in the face of increasing population and increasing industrial production. Unfortunately, digester gas contains contaminants which must be removed prior to its use in fuel cells. Because of how fuel cells are constructed and the chemical reaction that occurs within them, even minute amounts of undesirable compounds disable or -4- `/ Staff Report Fuel Cell Technology as a Potential Energy �./ Source and Air Pollution Control Strategy January 21, 1993 destroy their inner workings. This fact is a hurdle that research efforts must overcome before fuel cells can be used with digester gas. Research is now planned in Baltimore, Maryland, to study the use of digester gas in fuel cells. Funded by Congress and managed by EPA, this three-year-project will use the technology developed by International Fuel Cells. The system will be installed at a wastewater treatment plant operated by the City of Baltimore. Installation of the fuel cell system is planned for 1994 and the research should be completed by the end of 1995. Staff contacted the City of Baltimore to determine the scope of the work and if the Districts can participate. One possible approach is for the Districts to work through the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA). AMSA has an Air Quality Committee, co- chaired by a Districts' staff member, that works on the policy and technical issues of the 1990 Federal Clean Air Act. With over 125 member agencies representing virtually every large wastewater agency in the country, AMSA can quickly pool its talents to understand the practical needs and restraints for achieving air quality mandates and meet increasing energy demands. Fuel cell technology was presented by Staff at the Pretreatment, Hazardous waste and Air Subcommittee at the California Association of Sanitation Agencies' (CASA) winter meeting at Palm Springs. A detailed presentation to the Managers Meeting will then follow at the next CASA Conference in May to inform the California wastewater treatment community about this potential technology. For the next two or three years, we may wish to only observe and provide input. The early experiences of the Baltimore project will, hopefully, answer many questions about digester gas applications. After that, we may wish to conduct follow-on studies ourselves, or jointly with others, that play off the experience and insights of the Baltimore work. So much is unknown about fuel cell technology and its susceptibility to digester gas contamination that it makes sense to wait and learn from this first-of-a-kind project. 6) Conclusions Staff believes that we should pursue testing a Gas Company fuel cell at our facility. It is a raze opportunity to field-test the newest technological device with an enormous energy and environmental potential, without investing a significant amount of -5- Staff Report Fuel Cell Technology as a Potential Energy Source and Air Pollution Control Strategy January 21, 1993 money into the project. Districts' Staff is also planning to maintain contacts with the developer of the first commercial fuel cells, IFC, and also pursue contacts with other promising, though not yet commercialized, fuel cell technology firms. The development of fuel cell technology is a long-term research need. It is quite possible that it will take one or two decades before its use is widespread. There are many economic and technical hurdles that must be overcome for fuel cells to be of real value to the wastewater industry. Nevertheless, like Edison's light bulb of a 100 years ago, we would still be using gas light if he had decided that the technical uncertainly he faced was too great and that it was unlikely that his new technology would ever become an economical and practical method for lighting households and industry. 7) Recommended Actions It is recommended that the Committee: 1. Authorize Staff to send a letter to the Gas Company formally expressing our interest in fuel cells and our desire to establish a unit at our facilities in the near future. 2. Authorize Staff to prepare a report identifying the proposed location, cost to the Districts, and contractual requirements of the Gas Company to install and operate a fuel cell demonstration unit and to provide a final recommendation to the Committee. 3. Authorize Staff to maintain involvement in the Baltimore Project through our association with AMSA. 4. Report to the Committee from time-to-time, as appropriate, on the progress of fuel cell technology research and development. Ref #330025.rp -6- `/ Fuel Cell Technology as a Potential Energy Source DC power E Ei a " Air Fuel —► �` Water and CO2 '/ Heat Fuel + Air Power + Water + Heat + CO2 + OX + Ox + �9' + V9 + NXise 88 2045 � FUEL CELL POWER SYSTEM Automatic controls Raw Fuel Fuel Power Conditioned fuel processor cell conditioner power Oxidant Heat Water FC25845 R911869 . Our Potential Options 1 . Use natural gas like conventional commercial applications are beginning to do. 2. Use digester gas which is a natural by-product of our sludge treatment process (65% methane gas) . THE:'PG25 ; .t ; `A Packaged Utility System 200-kW FUEL CELL POWER PLANT Power Module4;," 10 x 24 x 11-1/2 feet • Fuel processor • Fuel cell power section • Power conditioner • Customer heat exchanger • Controller • Diagnostics • Weather-proof enclosure FC33455 R921402 Availability of Commercial Fuel Cells • Currently one manufacturer • Has built 24 — 200 kw fuel cells • In limited commercial use • Pilot program by SCAQMD/Gas Company Turn-key Discounted electrical cost - Purchase unit at end of demo l 1 f ZZO P. , RING RACl'ERIS xS� • High electrical efficiency Low operating cost • Automatic unattended operation • Clean, quiet, vibration free operation Good neighbor - locate anywhere • High quality power - computer compatible Large market • Grid-connected or grid-independent capability potential FC28406 ❑ R921102 PC25 . EXHAUST IS CLEAN NOx CO ROG** 40 2500 250 30 2000 200 PPM 20 1500 150 1000 100 10 500 50 Y. 0 <1 0 4 G ` *SCAOMD Measured STD PC25 average *South Coast Air Quality Management District Standard Rule 1110.2, 15% 02, dry basis **Reactive organic gases (non-methane) FC30053 ❑ R911309 Use of. Our Digester Gas as a Fuel Source • Central Generation: 100% of digester gas next 20 years • SCAOMD Rules will continue to ratchet down • Wide use of fuel cells 10 years away • Major projects 10 years from concept to start-up COMMERCIAL FUEL CELL ANAEROBIC DIGESTER GAS TO ENERGY CONVERSION CONCEPT ANAEROBIC I DIGESTERS STEAM PLAFA NT it i I � liilll III I �� ELECTRICAL AND THERMA 200 KW FUEL CALL GAS PRETREATMENT SITE INTERFACES POWER PLANT MODULE FC00007 R92YBf' ` ♦ � Of (DD �4 N N wp %wdoo VIA o N i N 4 Environmental Concerns • Waste methane Uncontrolled sources Greenhouse gas • Criteria pollutants - Products of combustion (I .C. Engines, boilers, flares) Federal ambient air standards Stricter controls on stationary sources e r EPA Estimated Methane Emissions Source Billion Cubic Feet/yr Landfills 750 Wastewater Treatment Plants 170 Animal Waste 450 Coal Mines 800 Objectives Of Baltimore Project • Operate on a fuel with a lower BTU value than natural gas • Remove or control all sulfur compounds • Remove or control other interfering compounds • Develop cost-effective system Value of electricity produced 3 - 9 0/kwh Expected cost to produce 20 - 30 0 /kwh ANAEROBIC DIGESTER PROGRAM SCHEDULE 1992 11993 1994 1995 1996 10/01/92 Contract Start d Phase I - Program Design and Issue Definition - Site Integration - Component Definition - Test Description - Program Cost Update Phase II - Issue Resolution - Component Fabrication and Installation - site Specific Design - Qas Clean Up Module - Fuel Cell Modifications - Demo Project Construction Phase III - Demonstration Test -1 Year Fuel Cell Test - Environmental Testing - Analysis and Teardown FC34675 O 921210 RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 1 . Authorize Staff to formally express our interest to The Gas Company to establish a demo unit at our facilities in the near future. 2 . Authorize Staff to prepare a report including : location, cost, contractual requirements to install and operate a fuel call demo unit and provide recommendation to the Committee. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 3. Authorize Staff to maintain involvement in the Baltimore Project through our association with CASA and AMSA. (Expected to extend into 1996) 4. Report to the Committee from time-to-time, as appropriate, on the progress of fuel cell technology research and development. a ,� - � emu' '."� �•, s �, N Principles of Fuel Cell Operation Background electrodes vary with the nature of the electrolyte,fuel cells combine hydrogen and oxygen ions to form water A fuel cell is an electrochemical engine that converts the chemical energy of a fuel and an oxidant directly to and,in the process,produce a flow of electrons from the anode to the cathode. electricity.The principal components of a fuel cell are catalytically activated electrodes for the fuel(anode) When an acid electrolyte is used,hydrogen gas and the oxidant(cathode)and an electrolyte to conduct dissociates at the negative electrode(anode)to form ions between the two electrodes. Because the operating hydrogen ions(H+)and an equivalent number of conditions of the fuel cell,particularly temperature,and electrons(e): the composition of the electrodes are largely determined by the electrolyte,fuel cells are classified by the type of H2— 2H++2e- electrolyte used. The electrons flow through the external load to the The fuel cell was invented in 1839 by Sir William positive electrode(cathode)where the electrons react Robert Grove,a British jurist,who used hydrogen as with oxygen(02)from the air and water(H20)from the the fuel,oxygen as the oxidant,platinum electrodes, electrolyte to form negatively charged hydroxyl ions and dilute sulfuric acid as the electrolyte.Work on the (OH-), alkaline fuel cell(AFC),which uses an aqueous solution of potassium hydroxide as the electrolyte and pure V2 02+H2O+2e-— 2OH- iydrogen and oxygen as,fuel and oxidant,respectively, was begun in 1932 by Francis T. Bacon of the UX By The hydrogen and hydroxyl ions then combine in the 1965,the AFC was in routine use for space flight. electrolyte to form water,giving the overall Today,four parallel 15-kW AFC modules provide all the electrochemical reaction of gaseous hydrogen end electricity for the Space Shuttle Orbiter. oxygen combining to form water: The AFC,although a mature technology for space H2+ 112 02— H2O applications,requires pure hydrogen and oxygen free of carbon dioxide and to date has not found many The electrochemical conversion of energy in fuel cells terrestrial applications. Other types of fuel cells that takes place at a much higher efficiency than that of can use abundant fuel sources containing hydrogen, combustion in heat engines,which is limited by the such as natural gas and methanol,are being developed Carnot cycle.The theoretical efficiency for the for both stationary power generation and transportation conversion of heat energy into electrical energy in a applications.For transportation uses,fuel cells must hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell is 83%(Glasstone,p. 140). not only be efficient and reliable but must also have Efficiencies of practical cells using pure hydrogen and high power density,rapid start-up,be able to respond to oxygen range from 50%to 60%.Cells using hydrogen frequent load changes,and resist shock and vibration. derived from hydrocarbon sources and oxygen from air Technologies being sponsored by the Department of have somewhat lower efficiencies. Energy(DOE)include the phosphoric acid,proton- exchange membrane,molten carbonate,and solid oxide The theoretical electromotive force(emf)of the fuel cells. hydrogen-oxygen cell operating reversibly at 1 Eiedfochemisf atmosphere and 250C is 1.23 volts(V),but at current rY densities needed for applications,the cell end falls to Except for the molten carbonate fuel cell,all of the fuel 0.7 to 0.8 V due to polarization effects.Cell behavior at cells described here operate in the reverse direction of low current drain(activation polarization)is dominated the electrolysis of water in which electricity is used to by the inherent slowness of the electrode reaction and dissociate water to produce gaseous hydrogen and at high current drain(concentration polarization)by oxygen.Although electrochemical reactions at the the inherent limitations of gaseous and ionic diffusion I the same kind of satisfaction expected from a P.G.Patil,"Fuel Cells for Transportation;presentation at conventional vehicle using an internal combustion 2nd Grove Fuel Cell Symposium,London,Sept 24.27,1991� engine but without the pollution or the noise. Journal ofPomer Sources,37(1992)pp. 171-179. The environmental legislation enabled in California F.C.Schma and E.H.Camem,'Fuel Cells:Power for the and the adoption of similar legislation in the north- Future.'Energy and Enoirodge,M -* the 21et Centu,1991,p eastern United States will require a significant portion ed.J.W.Tester,et al.,Cambridge,MA:M11'Press,1991,pp. 959-97. of the U.S.vehicle market to have zero-emission vehicles by the end of this decade.Fuel cells are one of 'hydrogen and Fuel Cells:The Perfect Drivers for two available technologies that can meet the zero- Transportation,'National Hydrogen Association position emission vehicle requirements. paper,Washington,DC,1992. The United States is a world leader in fuel cell For more Information,Contact: technology and is at the forefront of commercializing - phosphoric acid fuel cells,the most developed fuel cell Pandit G.Patil technology for stationary electricity generation.Also Once of Propulsion Systems under development in the United States are more U.S.Department Inof dependence, advanced fuel cells.These advanced fuel cells include W00 ington,DC 20 Ave.,SW the proton-exchange membrane(PEM),a fuel cell that Washington,DC 20585 (202)086-8055 seems particularly well suited for transportation;the molten carbonate,another well developed fuel cell for use in stationary generation of electricity;and solid oxide and alkaline,both fuel cells having great potential for use in transportation applications. Fuel cells are a proven technology.They have been _ used successfully in the space program for three decades.Global commercial interest and development in fuel cells for transportation is beginning.DOE's -plans call for continued and growing support for the development of this technology to ensure that the United States maintains its lead in this important area. Pabrtatlons S.Glasstone,'Fuel Cell;Energy Deekbook,(DOE/IR 05114-1).Oak Ridge,TN,June 1982,pp.136-144. M. Brumpelt and C.C.Christianson,An Assessment and Comparison of Fuel Cells for Transportation DE 93000002 Applications,(ANL-89/28),Argonne,IL,Sept. 1999. November 1992 w5 Depaztpe o nenVil Principles of Fuel Cell Operation Background electrodes vary with the nature of the electrolyte,fuel cells combine hydrogen and oxygen ions to form water A fuel cell is an electrochemical engine that converts and,in the process,produce a flow of electrons from the the chemical energy of a fuel and an oxidant directly to anode to the cathode. electricity.The principal components of a fuel cell are catalytically activated electrodes for the fuel(anode) When an acid electrolyte is used,hydrogen gas and the oxidant(cathode)and an electrolyte to conduct dissociates at the negative electrode(anode)to form ions between the two electrodes. Because the operating hydrogen ions(H+)and an equivalent number of conditions of the fuel cell,particularly temperature,and electrons(a-): the composition of the electrodes are largely determined by the electrolyte,fuel cells are classified by the type of H2— 2H++2e electrolyte used. The electrons flow through the external load to the The fuel cell was invented in 1839 by Sir William positive electmde(cathode)when the electrons react Robert Grove,a British jurist,who used hydrogen as with oxygen(02)from the air and water(H20)from the the fuel,oxygen as the oxidant,platinum electrodes, electrolyte to form negatively charged hydroxyl ions and dilute sulfuric acid as the electrolyte.Work on the (OH-): alkaline fuel cell(AFC),which uses an aqueous solution of potassium hydroxide as the electrolyte and pure 1/2 02+H2O+2e�20H- ` ,rydrogen and oxygen as fuel and oxidant,respectively, was begun in 1932 by Francis T.Bacon of the U.K.By The hydrogen and hydroxyl ions then combine in the 1965,the AFC was in routine use for space flight. electrolyte to form water,giving the overall Today,four parallel 15-kW AFC modules provide all the electrochemical reaction of gaseous hydrogen and electricity for the Space Shuttle Orbiter. oxygen combining to form water: The AFC,although a mature technology for space H2+ 1/2 02— H2O applications,requires pure hydrogen and oxygen free of carbon dioxide and to date has not found many The electrochemical conversion of energy in fuel cells terrestrial applications. Other types of fuel cells that takes place at a much higher efficiency than that of can use abundant fuel sources containing hydrogen, - such as natural gas and methanol,are being developed Carrocombustion in heat engines,which is limited the for both stationary power generation and transportation convey cycle.The theoretical efficiency for the conversion of heat energy into electrical energy in aapplications.For transportation uses,fuel cells must hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell is 83%(Glasstone,p. 140). not only be efficient and reliable but must also have Efficiencies of practical cells using pure hydrogen and high power density,rapid start-up,be able to respond to oxygen range from 50%to 60%.Cells using hydrogen frequent load changes,and resist shock sand vibration. derived from hydrocarbon sources and oxygen h d Technologies being sponsored by the Department of y from air have somewhat lower efficiencies. Energy(DOE)include the phosphoric acid,proton- exchange membrane,molten carbonate,and solid oxide The theoretical electromotive force(emf)of the fuel cells. hydrogen-oxygen cell operating reversibly at 1 atmosphere and 250C is 1.23 volts(V),but at current Electrochemistry densities needed for applications, the cell emf falls to Except for the molten carbonate fuel cell,all of the fuel 0.7 to 0.8 V due to polarization effects.Cell behavior at cells described here operate in the reverse direction of low current drain(activation polarization)is dominated ` the electrolysis of water in which electricity is used to by the inherent slowness of the electrode reaction and dissociate water to produce gaseous hydrogen and at high current drain(concentration polarization)by oxygen.Although electrochemical reactions at the the inherent limitations of gaseous and ionic diffusion rates.The middle,or operating range,is dominated by are more efficient in converting fuels to electricity and ohmic polarization due to the electrical resistance of the because they produce almost no harmful air or water electrolyte. emissions.The principal by-product of fuel cells using hydrogen-based fuels is water.Almost none of the The electrochemistry of the proton-exchange membrane regulated emissions for passenger cars(hydrocarbons, fuel cell(PEM)is similar to the phosphoric acid fuel cell oxides of nitrogen,carbon monoxide,particulates)are (PAFC)and operates within the same pressure range released from fuel cells,and vehicles powered by fuel but at a lower temperature(about SO°C). cells easily surpass all existing and proposed emission limits.The higher efficiency of fuel cells also means System Configuration and Fuel Processing that less carbon dioxide is produced per kilowatt-hour The major components of a fuel cell system are the (kWh),so fuel cells used in both transportation and power section,fuel processor,and power conditioner.In stationary applications would contribute far less to the power section,individual cells must be connected in global warming than conventional fossil-fuel series due to the low voltage output of a single cell. technologies. Cells are stacked so that the cathode of one cell is in electrical contact with the anode of the next cell while a Publications fuel and air feed system is maintained.Stacking design S.Glasstone,"Fuel Cell,"Energy Handbook, presents a major challenge for system engineering. (DOERR/05114-3)Oak Ridge,TN,June 1982,pp.136-144. M.Krumpelt and C.C.Christianson,An Assessment and Fuel cells under development by DOE require fuel Comparison of Fuel Cells for 7)nn8portationApplications,(ANI.89/28),Argonne,IL,Sept. 1989. processing since they use hydrogen derived from P.G.Patil,"Fuel Cells for Transportation,"Second Grove Fuel alternative fuels. For light hydrocarbon fuels,such as Cell Symposium,London,Sept.24-27,1991. methanol and natural gas,the methane is converted to F.C.Schom and E.H.Camara,"Fuel Cells:Power for the hydrogen and carbon dioxide through steam reforming Future,"Energy and Enuironment in the 21st Century, after sulfur compounds are removed to prevent ed.J.W.Tester,et al.,Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,1991,pp. poisoning of the catalysts and electrodes. 959-971. Auxiliary systems to control temperature and remove For more information,conta& heat are needed since heat is generated within the fuel Pandit G.Peril cell stacks,and the open circuit potential of the stacks Office of Propulsion Systems depends on their operating temperature.Heat removed U.S.Department of Energy from the stacks can be recycled to generate steam 1000 Independence Avenue,SW needed for reformingfuel. Washington, 20685 (202)586-8055 Environmental Benefits DE93000007 Fuel cells are inherently less polluting than November 1992 conventional fossil-fuel technologies because fuel cells Rejected The Fuel Cell Power Plant— j Air j Fuel to Electric Power I I Recovered I I Fuel cell Rejected I Fuel section Power processor conditioner (reformer) (inverter) I I I I I Processes fuel for fuel cell use I Converts processed fuel and air into DC power I Produces AC electric power �., •.� may '_ MIFI - Proton-Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cells Background degradation of the electrocatalyst by carbon monoxide The proton-exchange membrane fuel cell (PEM)uses a (CO).Low-temperature fuel cells need platinum or a proton-conducting polymeric membrane as the noble metal catalyst to catalyze the anodic and electrolyte.This fuel cell is known by several other cathodic fuel cell reactions,but CO is preferentially names,such as the polymer electrolyte fuel cell adsorbed on platinum in an acid electrolyte and blocks the access of hydrogen( (PEFC),the solid polymer fuel cell(SPFC),and the to the surface the solid polymer electrolyte(SPEW")fuel cell.SPEW"was catalyst.This adsorptionn is s inversely related to a registered trademark of the General Electric temperature,being greater at lower temperatures.At 8 a concentration CO greater than a few parts Company(GE).The Hamilton Standard Division of perer million(ppm)in the fuel gas substantially degrades United Technologies Corporation now owns the the performance of the PEM.Thus,for use with technology and trademark. reformed fossil fuels,CO must be reduced to only trace Development History and Current Status levels in the fuel gas.However,if CO contamination occurs,fuel cell performance is completely restored in a In the early 1960s, GE developed a new type of fuel cell short time if pure H2 is supplied to the cell. using a polystyrene-based ion exchange membrane. NASA used this fuel cell in the Gemini program Another requirement for PEMs is the need to humidify beginning in 1964.In 1968,DuPont developed a the fuel and oxidant streams.Failure to maintain at Teflon"-based perfluorinated membrane,Nation", least 400 cam Hg of water vapor pressure results in for chlor-alkali cells.Nation'"consists of a Teflonr" dehydration of the membrane,which leads to very "backbone"with side chains terminating in sulfonic large increases in electrical resistance.The best way to acid functional groups. GE adopted Nall as the maintain sufficiently high water vapor pressures membrane of choice because of its superior perform- without excessively diluting the He and oxygen is to ance and long life.Because its electrolyte is acidic,in pressurize the system.Maintaining a high partial common with other acid-electrolyte fuel cells,the PEM pressure of water in the cell is necessary on the fuel can tolerate carbon dioxide.Thus,it is possible to run side because every proton migrating from the anode to a PEM on a hydrogentcarbon dioxide mixture derived the cathode across the membrane carries water as a from reformed fossil fuels.The PEM technology benefited from the development of a new polymer Exhausl electrolyte membrane by Dow Chemical in the mid- 1980s.Dow Chemical's membrane has a lower electrical resistance than Nationn",which permits After uel vaporizer increased current densities. Water recovery AirWater vaporizer Spent In the late 1980s,General Motors Corporation(GM) fuel concluded that the PEM was unique in that it allowed start-up from ambient temperature at partial load,anPEM important consideration for transportation appli- Coolant cations.The technology also delivered a high powerSlack density,which has a direct impact on weight,volume, and performance considerations.Today, active PEM Exhaust fuel cell R&D projects are under way in North America E (a.,. -'*M,IFC,Ballard, Ergenics,Analytic Power,US Fue; c'ells),in Europe(e.g.,Siemens and DeNora),and (H30HWR in Japan(e.g.,Mitsubishi and Fuji). H30 Air Key Technical Challenges The PEM operates at 80°C. One consequence of this System Ce A PEM Fuel low operating temperature is an extreme sensitivity to y and CO2.A small amount of carbon monoxide(CO) Publications > also forms at equilibrium under the selected reaction conditions.The fuel stream from the reformer J.H.ch olrschenhofer,'Latest Progress in Fuel Cell Energ (consisting Of H2,CO2,water vapor, 1%Or less of CO, Technology,'Proceedings of the enc7th,San sego, A,A and a small amount of=reacted methanol)is fed to Conversion Engineering Conference,San Diego,CA,A the anode side of the fuel cell,where about 80%of the 3-7, 1992,pp.3.335-3.342. H2 is electrochemically oxidized.The depleted fuel W.Podolny and J.Schmitt,'Phwphoric Arid Power Plants in stream is routed to the reformer burner,where the Service;Program and Abstmets:1992 Fuel Cell remaining fuel is burned,providing heat for the Seminar,Tucson,AZ,Nov.29-Dee 2,1992. reforming reaction.Air kept separate from the fuel stream passes through the cathode side of the fuel cell R.Amhara,•A Perspective on PAFC Commercialisation," stack to complete the electrochemical reaction. Proceedings of the Second Grove International Fuel Cell Symposium,London,September 24.27,1991,Journal of To start up the PAFC system,the oil circulating Power Sources,37(1992),pp. 119-132. through the stack is heated in an auxiliary burner M.until the fuel cell reaches about 1300C(266T). Co parisot and C. l Celti for 7 An Assessment and Simultaneously,methanol is pumped through the Comparison of Fuel Cells for 7Yomportoti19 Applications,ANL-89/28,Argonne,iL,Sept 1989. reformer and fuel cell without reacting and then burned in the reformer burner until the reformer A.J.Appleby and F.R.Foulkes,Fuel Cell Handbook,New operating temperature is achieved.Starting at ambient York:Van Nostrand Reinhold,1989. temperatures, the start-up can take more than an hour,but start-up from standby temperatures takes For more inlormofion, Contort: only minutes. Robert A.Kost Office of Propulsion Systems In transportation applications,such as an urban bus, U.S.Department of Energy electric power from the fuel cell drives electric motors 1000 Independence Avenue,SW that provide traction energy to the wheels through a Washington,DC 20585 transmission.Because of the frequent accelerations (202),%6-2334 and decelerations on a typical bus route,the average 1 , power required to complete the route is only about one- Paul R.prokopius half of the peak power required to accelerate the bus. NASA Lewis Research Center To provide the peak power,at the current stage of 21000 Brookpark Road PAFC development,it is desirable to use batteries in Cleveland,OH 44135 (216)433-6124 parallel with the fuel cells.Electrically,fuel cells can respond quickly to changes in the amount of power required by the vehicle,but when the current is increased or decreased the fuel processing rate has to change correspondingly,and the heat removal rate from the fuel cell stack has to be adjusted.In principle, these rate changes should be manageable.But at present it is preferable to run the fuel cell system at constant conditions to provide the average power,and to use the batteries to provide the high power demands of the route and to absorb the excess fuel cell power DE93000003 output during periods of low propulsion power demands. November 1992 `d I% ~ Proton-Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cells Background degradation of the electrocatalyst by carbon monoxide The proton-exchange membrane fuel cell(PEM)uses a (CO).Low-temperature fuel cells need platinum or a proton-conducting polymeric membrane as the noble metal catalyst to catalyze the anodic and electrolyte.This fuel cell is known by several other cathodic fuel cell reactions,but CO is preferentially names,such as the polymer electrolyte fuel cell adsorbed on platinum in an acid electrolyte and blocks (PEFC),the solid polymer fuel cell(SPFC),and the the access of hydrogen (Hp)to the surface of the solid polymer electrolyte(SPEr")fuel cell. SPETAe was catalyst.This adsorption is inversely related to a registered trademark of the General Electric temperature,being greater at lower temperatures.At Company(GE).The Hamilton Standard Division of 80°C, a concentration of CO greater than a taw parts United Technologies Corporation now owns the per million(ppm)in the fuel gas substantially degrades technology and trademark. the performance of the PEM.Thus,for use with reformed fossil fuels,CO must be reduced to only trace Development History and Current Status levels in the fuel gas. However,if CO contamination occurs,fuel cell performance is completely restored in a In the early 1960s,GE developed a new type of fuel cell short time if pure Hp is supplied to the cell. using a polystyrene-based ion exchange membrane. NASA used this fuel cell in the Gemini program Another requirement for PEMs is the need to humidify beginning in 1964. In 1968,DuPont developed a the fuel and oxidant streams.Failure to maintain at Teflo0'-based perfluorinated membrane,Nation"', least 400 man Hg of water vapor pressure results in for chlor-alkali cells. Nafzonvx consists of a Teflon'^' dehydration of the membrane,which leads to very "backbone"with side chains terminating in sulfonic large increases in electrical resistance.The best way to acid functional groups. GE adopted NafiorP as the maintain sufficiently high water vapor pressures membrane of choice because of its superior perform- without excessively diluting the Hz and oxygen is to once and long life. Because its electrolyte is acidic,in pressurize the system. Maintaining a high partial common with other acid-electrolyte fuel cells,the PEM pressure of water in the cell is necessary on the fuel can tolerate carbon dioxide.Thus,it is possible to run side because every proton migrating from the anode to a PEM on a hydrogen/carbon dioxide mixture derived the cathode across the membrane carries water as a from reformed fossil fuels.The PEM technology benefited from the development of a new polymer Exhaust electrolyte membrane by Dow Chemical in the mid- i 1980s.Dow Chemical's membrane has a lower electrical resistance than Nafzonv",which permits Reformer FV:Fuel vaporizer increased current densities. WR:Water recovery Nr WV:Water vaporizer Spent In the late 1980s,General Motors Corporation(GM) m fuel concluded that the PEM was unique in that it allowed (D Removal start-up from ambient temperature at partial load,an PEM important consideration for transportation appli- Coolant cations.The technology also delivered a high power Air Stock density,which has a direct impact on weight,volume, and performance considerations.Today, active PEM Exhaust fuel cell R&D projects are under way in North America FV WV Water E (a., M,IFC, Ballard, Ergenics,Analytic Power,US tank Fue� i'ells),in Europe(e.g.,Siemens and DeNora),and NO WR in Japan(e.g.,Mitsubishi and Fuji). H20 Air Key Technical Challenges woier The PEM operates at 80°C. One consequence of this low operating temperature is an extreme sensitivity to A PEM Fuel Cell System hydration shell.This water must be continuously K B.Prater,"Solid Polymer Fuel Cell Developments at replenished at the anode to keep the membrane from Ballard;Proceedings of the Second Grove International Fuel' dehydrating at the anode. Cell Symposium, London,September 24-27, 1991,Journal 7 of Pourer Sources,37(1992).pp.181-188. System Designs A.P.Meyer,"Status of Solid Polymer Fuel Cell Power Plane The Dow diagram shows a methanol-fueled PEM Development at International Fuel Cells Corporation," system.In addition to a fuel reformer,the system Proceedings of the 24th Intersociety Energy Conversion includes a preoxidizer,where CO is oxidized with a Engineering Conference,Washington,DC,Aug.6-11, precisely controlled amount of air to reduce the 0.5%r 1989,pp.1619-1622. CO coming from the reforming reactor to only a few ppm.A turbocompressor raises the air pressure, M.Erumpelt and C.Christianson,An Assessment and typically to about 3 atm(0.3 MPa).Because of the Comparison of Fuel Cells for Transportation continuous flux of water across the membrane,more Applications,AN1,89/28,Argonne,IL,Sept.1989. water must be injected into the fuel stream than is A.J.Appleby and F.R.Foulkes,Fuel Cell Handbook,New required for reforming.Recovering water from the air York:Van Nostrand Reinhold,1989. stream and recycling it to the evaporator would avoid the necessity for large tanks of makeup water. For more information,contact: Pandit G.Patil Current densities of up to 4 A/em2 have been reported Office of Propulsion Systems for single PEM cells.However,such high current U.S.Department of Energy densities in single cells should not be considered as 1000 Independence Avenue,SW representative of the technology when it is used in Washington,DC 20585 kilowatt-sized power systems nor,indeed,as (202)586-8055 representative of the desired operating point of full- scale power systems.At high current densities,the Nicholas E.Vanderborgh amount of heat generated per unit area is very high, Los Alamos National Laboratory and it is difficult to adequately cool a stack to keep"hot P.O.Box MS- - MEE•18,o.,NM 8 spots"from forming.This localized overheating in the Los Alamos,NM 87545 cell assembly now limits the attainable current density (505)667.6651 to about 1 A/cm2 in large fuel cell stacks. Publications H.F.Creveling,`Research and Development of a Proton Exchange Membrane(PEM)Fuel Cell System for Transportation Applications,"Proceedings of the Annual Automotive Technology Development Contractors' Meeting,Dearborn,MI,October 28-31, 1991,Society of Automotive Engineers,P-256,June 1992,pp.201-211. M.S.Wilson at al.,'Recent Achievements in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Gall(PEFC)Research,"Proceedings ofthe Annual Automotive Technology Development Contractors'Meeting,Dearbom,MI,October 28-32,1991, DE83000004 Society of Automotive Engineers,P-256,Jane 1992,pp.213- 217 November 1992 `r. National Program Plan for Fuel Cells in Transportation Background industry partnerships expands upon the present DOE Fuel cells offer promise as a potential replacement for fuel cell program and establishes the R&D needed for the internal combustion engine(ICE)in vehicles the post-2000 commercialization of fuel cell vehicles because they are: Wile).The goal of the program is to establish FCVs as a cost-effective replacement for ICE vehicles as rapidly • energy efficient as possible. • fuel flexible • clean The objectives of the Program Plan are based on a strategy of proceeding on multiple R&D paths The U.S. automotive industry is striving to produce featuring several fuel cell technologies and vehicle vehicles that incorporate these and other qualities applications.The Program Plan has the following near- through the use of fuel-cell-powered propulsion term and mid-to-long-term objectives: systems.The use of fuel cell technology could result in . By 1995,complete the initial demonstration of fuel reduced petroleum imports,improved national cells in urban transit buses and provide the economics,and improved environmental quality.(See technology basis to develop fuel cell power systems accompanying fact sheet on energy, economic,and for passenger vehicles and locomotives environmental benefits.) • By 1998,establish the feasibility of multiple vehicle s President's National Critical Technologies Panel concepts and fabricate and demonstrate prototypes to 1,. ected fuel cells as one of 22 essential technologies establish the benefits of the technology that the U.S. must develop and use to achieve economic • By 2000,establish commercial viability of FCVs by prosperity and maintain national security. In addition, producing several small fleets(50 to 200 vehicles) the National Energy Strategy(NES)calls on the using one or more fuel cell concepts for public use Department of Energy(DOE)to"accelerate research and development(R&D)of fuel cell vehicles to produce • By 2005,provide first-generation commenial FCVs cost-effective alternatives over the long term."The . By 2011,begin sales of fully competitive FCVs. NES reinforces the DOE Fuel Cell Systems R&D Program by strengthening R&D programs through Research and Development Strategy enhanced Federal support;by encouraging cost-shared efforts among government,industry,and universities; The R&D strategy in the Program Plan is based in part and by promoting industry consortia and cooperative on the following considerations. R&D ventures. • R&D will be linked to both electric vehicle initiatives and alternative fuels development programs and will Program Objectives leverage past and ongoing fuel cell R&D programs To help the nation achieve the energy and for stationary and space applications. environmental objectives of the NES, DOE has • The strategy is based on an evolutionary approach, prepared the Multi-year National Program Plan proceeding from near-term,lowest risk technology for Fuel Cells in Transportation(hereafter called (phosphoric acid fuel cells)and applications(buses) Program Plan). The Program Plan proposes a to longer-term,higher risk technologies(proton- comprehensive cost-shared partnership between exchange membrane and solid oxide fuel cells)and government and industry to accelerate the R&D of fuel applications(automobiles). cell technologies to enable their commercialization by . R&D will proceed along parallel paths to increase the auto industry soon after the year 2000.This chance of eventual success by developing lower risk 1.4ion-focused program based on government and technologies to back up higher risk technologies. Monolithic SOFCs are being developed in the United The whole system most be thermally insulated and States by Allied-Signal,Inc.Monolithic SOFCs have a maintained at a stand-by temperature even when the higher power density than tubular or planar designs, vehicle in not running.A 50-kW monolithic SOFC but monolithic SOFCs are more difficult to fabricate system suitable for automotive propulsion is estimated v and are at an early stage of development. Small to weigh about 100 kg and have a volume of about 200 --� multicell stacks have been built and tested but at L.The fuel-to-electricity energy efficiency of SOFCs is I power levels much less than 1 kW. projected to be about 45%of the fuel's higher heating value. System Designs Publications SOFCs operate at a high temperature and therefore do W.J.Dollard,"SoSd Oxide Fuel Cell Developments at not need platinum or other precious metals as Westinghouse,"Proceedings of the Second Grove catalysts.They are also much more tolerant of fuel International Fuel Cell Symposium,London,September 24- impurities(such as carbon monoxide)than are lower 27,1991,Journal o Pwoer Sources,37,1992, temperature fuel cells. Since SOFCs are based on an f pp.133.140. oxygen-ion-conducting electrolyte,water is produced On M.Hsu,"Planar Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Development," the anode side,where it is readily available for use in Proceedings of the 26eh Intersociety Energy Conversion internal steam-reforming of hydrocarbon fuels. Conference,Boston,MA,Aug.4-9,1991,pp.606-610. Furthermore,the SOFC does not require a water tank or a water recovery system.Because SOFCs operate at K M.Myles at al.,"Monolithic Solid Oxide Fuel Cell temperatures high enough to reform hydrocarbon fuels Development,'Journal of Power Sources,29, 1990,pp. into hydrogen internally,they do not require a 311319. separate external reformer.In a SOFC,carbon G.Hossepian,"Development of Monolithic Solid Oxide Fuel monoxide can be used as a fuel,as can a broad range of Cells"Proceedings of 26th Intersociety Energy other fuels(e.g.,operation on diesel fuel has been Conversion Conference,Boston,MA,Aug.4-9, 1991,pp. shown to be feasible). 589-693. Although SOFCs operate at high temperatures,a M.Krumpelt and C.Christianson,An Assessment and complete SOFC system has fewer components and is Comparison of Fuel Cells for Transportation simpler than power systems based on other types of Applications,ANI.89/28,Argonne,IL,Sept.1989. fuel cells. In addition,because they are solid,all- ceramic structures,SOFCs may need less maintenance A.J.Appleby and F.R.Foulkes,Fuel Cell Handbook,New and be less expensive than other fuel cells.The SOFC York:Van Nostrand Reinhold,1989. system consists of only three major components:a fuel For more information,contact: preheater,a fuel cell,and an air preheater.In the fuel preheater,fuel is vaporized and partially decomposed Pandit G.Patil using the hot air coming from the fuel cell as the heat Office of Propulsion Systems source.The air preheater serves a dual function of fully U.S.Department of Energy 1000 oxidizing unused fuel and preheating the fresh air. Washington,DC 2 Avenue,SW Structurally,the air preheater is a countercurrent Washington, 5 20685 ceramic heat exchanger with an oxidation catalyst (202)fi66.8055 coating on the fuel side. Michael Krumpelt Electrochemical Technology Program Extent Argonne National Laboratory lhermol enclosure 9700 S.Casa Avenue Argonne,IL 604394837 (708)252-8520 Air Air healer Varied Water tank W e H:J I Ann e fvaporalor Methanol tank DE93000005 Schematic of a SOFC System November 1992 V National Program Plan for Fuel Cells in Transportation Background industry partnerships expands upon the present DOE Fuel cells offer promise as a potential replacement for fuel cell program and establishes the R&D needed for the internal combustion engine(ICE)in vehicles the post-2000 commercialization of fuel cell vehicles because they are: (FCVs).The goal of the program is to establish FCVs as a cost-effective replacement for ICE vehicles as rapidly • energy efficient as possible. • fuel flexible • clean The objectives of the Program Plan are based on a strategy of proceeding on multiple R&D paths The U.S. automotive industry is striving to produce featuring several fuel cell technologies and vehicle vehicles that incorporate these and other qualities applications.The Program Plan has the following near- through the use of fuel-cell-powered propulsion term and mid-to-long-tern objectives: systems.The use of fuel cell technology could result in . By 1995,complete the initial demonstration of fuel reduced petroleum imports,improved national economics,and improved environmental quality.(See cells technology o urban transit buses and provide the accompanying fact sheet on energy,economic,and logy basis develop fuel cell power systems environmental benefits.) for passenger vehicles and locomotives • By 1998,establish the feasibility of multiple vehicle 9 President's National Critical Technologies Panel concepts and fabricate and demonstrate prototypes to '-.,elected fuel cells as one of 22 essential technologies establish the benefits of the technology that the U.S. must develop and use to achieve economic • By 2000,establish commercial viability of FCVs by pmsperity and maintain national security. In addition, producing several small fleets(50 to 200 vehicles) the National Energy Strategy(NES)calls on the wing one or more fuel cell concepts for public use Department of Energy(DOE)to"accelerate research and development(R&D)of fuel cell vehicles to produce • By 2005,provide first-generation commercial FCVs cost-effective alternatives over the long term."The . By 2011,begin sales of fully competitive FCVs. NTES reinforces the DOE Fuel Cell Systems R&D Program by strengthening R&D programs through Research and Development Strategy enhanced Federal support;by encouraging cost-shared efforts among government,industry,and universities; The R&D strategy in the Program Plan is based in part and by promoting industry consortia and cooperative on the following considerations. R&D ventures. • R&D will be linked to both electric vehicle initiatives and alternative fuels development programs and will Program Objectives leverage past and ongoing fuel cell R&D programs To help the nation achieve the energy and for stationary and space applications. environmental objectives of the NES, DOE has • The strategy is based on an evolutionary approach, prepared the Multi-year National Program Plan proceeding from near-term,lowest risk technology for Fuel Cells in TFamportation(hereafter called (phosphoric acid fuel cells)and applications(buses) Program Plan).The Program Plan proposes a to longer-term,higher risk technologies(proton- comprehensive cost-shared partnership between exchange membrane and solid oxide fuel cells)and government and industry to accelerate the R&D of fuel applications(automobiles). cell technologies to enable their commercialization by . R&D will proceed along parallel paths to increase the auto industry soon after the year 2000.This chance of eventual success by developing lower risk ,...,sion-focused program based on government and technologies to back up higher risk technologies. r • Additional core research,technology development, environment,health and safety effects;transpor- and systems analyses will be conducted before tation systems requirements). decisions are made on the most promising technology and system configurations. Program Implementation Technical Plan The implementation strategy is based on industry and government sharing risks,benefits,and costs.A The Technical Plan includes the following elements. government and industry alliance will be formed to • Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell(PAFC)—system designs provide the necessary resources and organizational for the near-term integration into appropriate structure to proceed with the development program. transportation systems(buses);demonstration of the This alliance will facilitate program implementation technical feasibility for lowest risk applications with and provide national perspective,consensus, significant benefits(locomotives and trucks). and continuity of effort. • Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell(PEM)—mid- Publications term development of integrated power systems compatible with higher risk applications P.G.Patif'T r U.S.Department of Energy Fuel Cell (automobiles);higher power density and lower cost Program for Transportation Applications;Proceedings 7,the systems in higher risk applications with the promise �0°d Grove Fuel Cell Symposium,7,1992London,Sept 1-179. of greater benefits. 1991,Journal ojPomer Sources,97,1992,pp. 171-179. • Solid Oxide Fuel Cell(SOFC)—basic technology U.S.Department of Energy,Multi-yearNarional development for the demonstration of system Program Plan for Fuel Cells in Transportation,in press. feasibility for long-term applications. • Exploratory Research—development of new For more information, contact: concepts with potentially high payoffs(e.g.,direct Pandit G.Patil methanol oxidation systems and advanced hydrogen Office of Propulsion Systems storage systems). U.S.Department of Energy , 10001ndependence Avenue,SW • Supporting Research—R&D to improve all fuel cell Washington,DC 20585 technologies(e.g.,improved reformers). (202)586-8055 • Supporting Analyses—technical and economic DE93000006 assessments to direct and focus program activities November 1992 and to prioritize R&D(e.g.,economic benefits; 12 3 Smiles I-Draft environmental assessment 4 5 6 1 Henry duty 2-Rod and heavy duty requirements PAK app0mtion; 3-Caabenefl B 9 4-Rao fmsli lin PEM light duty 5-Truck and marine feasi6iliry applications 6-Bosdemo 10 11 7-Bus meet test SOR 8-MOON fuel coo vehicle demo 9-H2 fuel cog vehicle demo Supporting 12 13 14 15 10-Coll/stack proof of principle R&D 11-20 kW stock demo Direct McOH,moteciah,advanc e!H storage 12-Prototype power management system &placatory 2 B 13-H2 storage proof of principle R&D 14-Reformer demo I5-P1010type H2 storage system CY 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Activities Schedule for fuel Cells of Transportation I [� ti Fuel Cell Bus Program Background costs of installation over a longer period than passenger The use of fuel cells to power buses in urban centers cars.The regularity of the transit route structure will decrease our dependence on imported oil and,by permits testing under controlled conditions,and use of reducing air and noise pollution,improve the quality of the technology in urban areas will accentuate the life in our cities. Because fuel cells offer a clean, environmental benefits of fuel cells.Finally,a transit efficient,and fuel-flexible alternative to the internal system provides for a centralized maintenance and combustion engine,the Fuel Cell Systems Research and refueling routine. Development Program of the U.S.Department of Energy(DOE)is developing a fuel cell propulsion Program Objectives system for demonstration in urban transit buses.A fuel- The objectives of the program are to develop and cell-powered bus will have 50%higher fuel economy, demonstrate a methanol-fueled,PAFCtbattery-powered 99%lower emissions,and be 10.20 decibels quieter than urban transit bus to provide energy savings,petroleum a diesel-powered bus. displacement,and air quality improvements.The PAFC was chosen because it is a fairly mature technology, The Fuel Cell Bus Program is a multi-phase effort to having been proven in stationary power generation develop and demonstrate a methanol-fueled,phosphoric applications,and it has demonstrated reliable acid fuel cell(PAFC)propulsion system for small when performance on reformed methanol.Methanol was buses.The when transit bus system was selected as the selected to fuel the PAFC because it can be derived from entry point for application of fuel cells for several non-petroleum sources,such as coal,natural gas,and reasons.A bus is large enough to accomodate a first- biomass;it is easy to transport;and it can be converted "generation fuel cell design,and the long service life of to hydrogen at relatively low temperatures. The use of a transit buses allows amortization of the high initial battery in parallel with the fuel cell minimizes the size Melhonol reformer U 0 Y, Bunery subsplem - i ® Motor tmtroller Fuel all - stock Methanol look K motor Fuel-Cell-Powered Urban Bus n in the years after 2000,as FCVs displace a significant local air quality and carbon dimcide affecting global �'II portion of conventional vehicles that consume climate change that would have been emitted by the �9 petroleum-derived fuels.As part of the national conventional vehicles displaced by FCVs.The program to develop FCVs,DOE estimated the energy, estimated cumulative benefits for the period 1990 to economic,and environmental benefits resulting from 2030 resulting from avoided emissions due to FCVs the use of FCVs as future light-duty passenger comprising 24%of the total light-duty vehicle fleet vehicles.These estimates are based on analyses were about$5 billion for FCVs using methanol supporting the National Energy Strategy. reformed on-board and about$5.8 billion for FCVs using on-board hydrogen.These avoided emissions Estimates of energy,economic,and environmental were calculated using a total-fuel-cycle approach that benefits are based on assumptions about the number of tries to capture the emissions from fuel production as FCVs in the total vehicle fleet,which in turn depend on well as those from use of the fuel in vehicles. The assumptions about the performance and economic details of the analysis are presented in the Multi. competitiveness of both FCVs and conventional and year National Program Plan for Fuel Celia in alternative vehicle systems that will be available at the Transportation. same time.The supporting analysis upon which the estimates are based assumes that FCVs will constitute Future Activities 15%to 50%of the light-duty vehicle fleet by the year 2030 DOE will continue to conduct analyses providing information on system benefits and costs related to Energy Benefits future FCVs.Both absolute and incremental benefits The cumulative energy,economic,and environmental and costs need to be determined for a range of benefits of FCVs were calculated for 1990 to 2030 for technologies,fuels,and infrastructure alternatives. two scenarios, each having a"high"and"loud' Additionally,benefits and costs of FCVs will be penetration case:one for FCVs fueled by methanol and analyzed and compared with other promising the other for FCVs powered directly by hydrogen. alternative systems in order to assess the cost- Methanol-fueled FCVs require on-board reformers and effectiveness of these vehicles. ' have a lower overall vehicle efficiency than FCVs Fulilitafions powered directly by hydrogen that do not require on- board reformers.Energy benefits calculated for both M.M.hlintz and A.D.Vyos,Forecast of D-ansportation scenarios showed a net savings of 2 billion to 4 billion Energy Demand Through the Year 2010,Argonne,IL, barrels of oil per day by 2030 after energy required to 1990(re%ised April 1991). produce fuel for these FCVs was subtracted. U.S.Department of Energy,MuIH•yearNotional Program Economic Benefits Plan for Fuel Cella in Transportation,in press. Total economic benefits range from $26 billion to$42 U.S.Environmental Protection Agency,National Air billion for the methanol-fueled FCV scenario and from Quality and Emission Trends Report,1988,EPA-450/4- $25 billion to$116 billion for the hydrogen-powered 91-003. FCV scenario,depending on the penetration case used. Economic benefits were calculated for each scenario by For more information,contact: subtracting the cost of the fuel for the FCVs and the Pandit G.Patil higher incremental cost of the FCV over a conventional Officaof Propulsion Systems vehicle from the amount of energy savings from U.S.Department of Energy displaced oil.This incremental cost was assumed to 1000 Independence Avenue,SW decrease gradually to zero per vehicle in 2011, after Washington,DC 20585 which significant economic energy benefits were (202)686-8055 estimated to accrue. Detailed energy and economic benefits are contained in the Multi-year National James M.Obi Program Plan for Fuel Cella in Transportation. National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Environmental Benefits Golden,CO 80401 (303)231-7681 The environmental benefits of using FCVs in place of conventional vehicles were estimated in terms of DE93000001 "avoided emissions" regulated pollutants affecting November 1992 n 1 • r cacent of. i Fuel Cell Bus Program Background costs of installation over a longer period than passenger The use of fuel cells to power buses in urban centers cars.The regularity of the transit route structure will decrease our dependence on imported oil and,by permits testing under controlled conditions,and use of reducing air and noise pollution, improve the quality of the technology in urban areas will accentuate the life in our cities. Because fuel cells offer a clean, environmental benefits of fuel cells.Finally,a transit efficient,and fuel-fiendble alternative to the internal system provides for a centralized maintenance and combustion engine,the Fuel Cell Systems Research and refueling routine. Development Program of the U.S. Department of Energy(DOE)is developing a fuel cell propulsion Program Objectives system for demonstration in urban transit buses.A fuel. The objectives of the program are to develop and cell-powered bus will have 50%higher fuel economy, demonstrate a methanol-fueled,PAFC/battery-powered 99%lower emissions,and be 10-20 decibels quieter than urban transit bus to provide energy savings,petroleum a diesel-powered bus. displacement,and air quality improvements.The PAFC was chosen because it is a fairly mature technology, The Fuel Cell Bus Program is a multi-phase effort to having been proven in stationary power generation develop and demonstrate a methanol-fueled,phosphoric applications,and it has demonstrated reliable acid fuel cell(PAFC)propulsion system for small urban performance on reformed methanol. Methanol was buses.The urban transit bus system was selected as the selected to fuel the PAFC because it can be derived from entry point for application of fuel cells for several non-petroleum sources,such as coal,natural gas,and reasons.A bus is large enough to accomodate a first- biomass;it is easy to transport; and it can be converted - generation fuel cell design,and the long service life of to hydrogen at relatively low temperatures.The use of a transit buses allows amortization of the high initial battery in parallel with the fuel cell minimizes the size Melhonol reformer • L/ 0 ki• Boner,whsyetem l® Motor mnooller Fuel(el stock Methanol lank B(motor Fuel-Cell-Powered Urban Bus of the fuel cell required.The PAFC will provide the Pubecations a average power required and will charge the battery Booz,Allen&Hamilton,Inc.,Research and Decelopment� when the bus is idling.The battery will supplement the of a Fuel CelllBattery Powered Bus System:Phase I PAFC by providing additional power(60 kilowatts) Final Technical Report,DOE/CM0650-01,Feb. 1990. needed during acceleration and to meet the fluctuating power demands of stop-and-go operation because the Energy Research Corporation,Research and Development fuel processing of the PAFC system does not allow for of Fuel CelpBattery Powered Bus System:Phase I rapid changes in power levels. Final Technical Report,DOE/CH/10714-01,Feb. 1990. Program Status R.J.Kevala,"Status of Fuel Cell Bus Development Program," The overall program is divided into four phases.The Proceedings of the SAE 1992 Future Transportation P fir' P Technology Conference,Costa Mesa,CA,August 10-13,1992. four•phese structure allows for evaluation of progress at the completion of each significant milestone.Phase I of For more information,contact: the program was completed in 1990 when two industrial contractors completed multi-year,cost-shared Robert A.Kest contracts to demonstrate proof-of-feasibility by building Office of Propulsion Systems and testing PAFC-battery brassboard systems half the U.S.Department of Energy size needed to power an urban bus.Test results from Wash Independence Avenue,SW Washington,DC 20585 Phase I verified the performance predicted by the (202)586-2334 design analysis and confirmed the feasibility of the fuel cell bus concept. In Phase II of the program,which James F.Miller began in April 1991,the objectives are to build three Electrochemical Technology Program 27•ft buses and to design a full-size(40-ft)bus powered ArgonnaNational Laboratory by a PAFC-battery system.The three buses will be 9700 S.Cass Avenue delivered in 1993 and 1994.In Phase III,scheduled to Argonne,IL 60439-4837 begin in 1994,a test-bed bus will be evaluated under (708)252-4537 controlled testing conditions on a track and on a Arthur Kaufman specified route.Under Phase IV,scheduled to begin in H-Power Corporation 1995,the Department of Transportation(DOT)will 60 Montgomery Street field test small fleets of prototype PAFC/battery- Belleville,NJ 07109 powered buses. (201)450-4400 Program Participants Samuel Romano The Fuel Cell Bus Program is sponsored jointly by Georgetown University DOE,DOT's Federal Transit Administration,and the Advanced Vehicle Development California South Coast Air Quality Management Suite 223,The Car Ban District. In Phase I,the industrial contractors were Washington,DC 200057-1079 (202)687-4504 Energy Research Corporation and Booz-Allen& Hamilton,with technical management provided by Argonne National Laboratory and Georgetown University. The Phase 11 prime contractor is H-Power Corporation, who is responsible for power source assembly and system evaluation.The support contractors are Boaz,Allen& Hamilton for system integration;Bus Manufacturing USA, Inc.,for test-bed bus assembly;Transportation Manufacturing Corporation for small-bus engineering and the 40-ft bus design;Fuji Electric for fuel cell fabrication; and Soleq Corporation for the motor, DE93000008 controller,and power conditioning. November 1992 ` 1 `d e4; Department _ Reformer Research for Fuel Flexibility in Fuel Cells Background methanol has been the fuel of choice to date since it Fuel cells operate by electrochemically combining can be derived from norpetroleum sources,is easy to hydrogen and oxygen to produce electricity and water. transport,and can be converted to hydrogen at For transportation applications of fuel cells,oxygen can relatively low temperatures.With reformers,liquid be obtained from the air,and hydrogen can either be fuels for fuel cells can be stored in a manner similar to carried on board the vehicle or derived from gasoline in internal combustion engine vehicles. hydrocarbon fuels by means of a fuel reformer. Reforming methanol to hydrogen involves a reaction of With existing state-of-the-art technology,hydrogen can gaseous methanol and steam on heterogeneous catalytic be stored either as a compressed gas in heavy tanks at surfaces, high pressure,as a meta)hydride,adsorbed on activated CH3OH+H2O— CO2+3 H2 carbon,or as liquid hydrogen at extremely low temperatures.These storage mechanisms all have a The reaction proceeds in two steps; the first being large weight or volume per unit of hydrogen stored.As decomposition of methanol to hydrogen and carbon a result,the amount of hydrogen that can be carried on monoxide and the second a"shift reaction"of carbon board a vehicle is restricted,and the driving range for monoxide and water to carbon dioxide and hydrogen. the vehicle is limited. Both reactions are carried out at 2000C or more and require a catalyst for each reaction.The overall reaction Fuel reformers,as an alternative to hydrogen storage, is endothermic,and the required energy can be supplied can extract hydrogen from carbon-based fuels such as from waste heat generated by other components of the methanol,ethanol,and natural gas that have a high fuel cell system. `tydrogen content.For transportation applications, `t Reformed Most reformers developed to date have been designed for stationary applications;they are large,heavy,and 1 IX Ak lack the fast start-up and dynamic response capabilities necessary for use in fuel-cell power systems for automotive applications. Rumen Program Objectives Rurrar exhoun The Department of Energy s(DOE)Fuel Cell Systems P 0 (f Research and Development(R&D)Program is supedmout sponsoring research on advanced reformer and hydrogen storage technologies to improve the (Clow objective of fuel-cell-powered vehicles. One objective of the program is to develop advanced fuel processing systems to reform methanol,ethanol, natural gas,and other hydrocarbons into hydrogen for • use in transportation fuel cell systems,while a second objective is to develop better systems for on-board hydrogen storage. Development of advanced reformer Empmaior and hydrogen storage technologies will not only provide fuel-flexibility,for fuel-cell-powered vehicles,but will also reduce system size and cost,reduce start-up time, and increase transient response capability. Program Status • 1• �� DOE initiated this project in May 1992 when it awarded a 30-month,cost-shared R&D contract to Melhand b Arthur D. Little,Inc.,of Cambridge,MA.The work will be divided into two phases;the first phase will consist Cross Section of a Methanol Reformer of a feasibility study,and the second phase will be and includes work on the conceptual design of a PEM- testing,Dow Chemical Company for membrane fabri- based propulsion system,R&D on limiting components cation and testing,Ballard Power Systems for fuel cell 4 to advance the technology to meet transportation stack fabrication,GM Research Laboratories for I application needs,and integration and testing of a electrode and catalyst studies,GM AC Rochester (( J complete 10-kilowatt(kW),breadboard PEM fuel cell Division for catalytic components,and GM Advanced <snj system.After a positive evaluation of the 30-kW Engineering Staff for vehicle system engineering. system, the Phase I design will be scaled-up to Technical management for Phase I is provided by demonstrate a 25-kW brassboard system in Phase II, Argonne National Laboratory. scheduled to begin in 1993,to show proof-of-feasibility. Phase III,system scale-up,will consist of laboratory Publications evaluation of a full-size,50-kW propulsion system. In H.F.Creveling,"Research and Development of a Proton- Phase IV,proof-of-concept,the full-size system will be Exchange-Membrane(PEM)Fuel Cell System for installed and evaluated in a test-bed vehicle. Transportation Applications;Proceedings of the Annual Automotive Technology Development Contractors' Program Status Coordination Meeting 1991,Dearborn,MI,Oct.28-31, Research over the past 10 years on the PEM fuel cell 1991,SAE publication P256,pp.201-211,June 1992. has resulted in a tiro-fold improvement in power H.F.Creveling,"Research and Development of a Proton. density.Over the last 5 years,the technology base has Exchange-Membrane(PEM)Fuel Cell System for developed to the point where the performance necessary Transportation Applications,"Program and Abstracts. for transportation applications can be achieved,at an 1992 Fuel Cell Seminar,Tucson,AZ,Nov.29-Dec.2, 1992. acceptable cost,with a hybrid PEM fuel cell/battery system.Although previous applications of the PEM fuel For more information,contact: cell have been only for space missions,Dow Chemical pandit G.Patil recently developed a new membrane with lower Office of Propulsion Systems electrical resistance.This new membrane can carry U.S.Department of Energy higher current densities that should make the PEM fuel 1000 Independence Avenue,SW cell more economical for transportation applications. Washington,DC 20585 Los Alamos National Laboratory has developed a (202)586-8055 method to decrease platinum loading,and manufacturers have developed less expensive graphite Clinton C.Christianson separator plates,similar to those used in PAFC stacks, Electrochemical Technology Program to replace expensive metal plates. Argonne National Laboratory , 9700 S.Cass Avenue ArgoAs part of Phase I activities,state-of-the-art 5-kW PEM (708)2 2IL 60439-4837 70W 52-7563 fuel cell stacks are under test. Research tasks being - addressed in Phase I include fuel-cell components,fuel Howard F.Creveling processing,electronic controls,gas pressurization, Allison Gas Turbine Division water and heat management,and battery type and General Motors Corporation specifications for start-up and to help meet transient Indianapolis,IN power needs. Other areas under study includa.vystem (317)230-4469 conceptual design,trade-off analyses and modelling, and breadboard integration. Program Participants The prime contractor for Phase I is the Allison Gas Turbine Division of General Motors Corporation(GM) who is responsible for overall system integration.The support contractors are Los Alamos National DE93000009 Laboratory for reformer development and fuel cell November 1992 I. Pi b. ,'2 B 111 11 1ergy ,Reformer Research for Fuel Flexibility in Fuel Cells Background methanol has been the fuel of choice to date since it Fuel cells operate by electrochemically combining can be derived from non petroleum sources,is easy to hydrogen and oxygen to produce electricity and water. transport,and can be converted to hydrogen at For transportation applications of fuel cells,oxygen can relatively low temperatures.With reformers, liquid be obtained from the air,and hydrogen can either be fuels for fuel cells can be stored in a manner similar to carried on board the vehicle or derived from gasoline in internal combustion engine vehicles. hydrocarbon fuels by means of a fuel reformer. Reforming methanol to hydrogen involves a reaction of With existing state-of-the-art technology,hydrogen can gaseous methanol and steam on heterogeneous catalytic be stored either as a compressed gas in heavy tanks at surfaces: high pressure,as a metal hydride,adsorbed on activated CH30H+H2O— CO2+3 Hz carbon, or as liquid hydrogen at extremely low temperatures.These storage mechanisms all have a The reaction proceeds in two steps;the first being large weight or volume per unit of hydrogen stored.As decomposition of methanol to hydrogen and carbon a result,the amount of hydrogen that can be carried on monoxide and the second a"shift reaction"of carbon board a vehicle is restricted,and the driving range for monoxide and water to carbon dioxide and hydrogen. the vehicle is limited. Both reactions are carried out at 2000C or more and require a catalyst for each reaction.The overall reaction Fuel reformers, as an alternative to hydrogen storage, is endothermic,and the required energy can be supplied can extract hydrogen from carbon-based fuels such as from waste heat generated by other components of the methanol,ethanol,and natural gas that have a high fuel cell system. Syc rogen content. For transportation applications, N-9c Relormed Most reformers developed to date have been designed gas for stationary applications;they are large,heavy,and (Hp top) Air lack the fast start-up and dynamic response capabilities necessary for use in fuel-cell power systems for automotive applications. Burner Program Objectives Burner exhaust The Department of Energy's(DOE)Fuel Cell Systems Q Q Q QQQ Research and Development(R&D)Pmgram is Superheater sponsoring research on advanced reformer and hydrogen storage technologies to improve the Wolin objective of fuel-cell-powered vehicles. One objective of the program is to develop advanced fuel processing systems to reform methanol,ethanol, natural gas,and other hydrocarbons into hydrogen for use in transportation fuel cell systems,while a second objective is to develop better systems for on-board hydrogen storage. Development of advanced reformer feoparuia and hydrogen storage technologies will not only provide fuel-flexibility for fuel-cell-powered vehicles,but will also reduce system size and cost,reduce start-up time, and increase transient response capability. Program Status DOE initiated this project in May 1992 when it awarded a 30-month,cost-shared R&D contract to Methanol b Arthur D. Little,Inc.,of Cambridge,MA.The work will be divided into two phases:the first phase will consist Cross Section of a Methanol Reformer of a feasibility study,and the second phase will be directed towards the fabrication and test of proofrof- concept reformer and hydrogen storage systems. For hobs information, contact: Robert A.Rost ' The Phase I Feasibility Study will identify the Once of Propulsion Systems reformate requirements for phosphoric acid and proton- U.S.Department of Energy exchange-membrane fuel cells,and examine the system 1000 Independence Avenue,SW "� trade-offs(i.e.,reformer size,weight,efficiency,quality Washington, 4 20585 - of reformate, life,cost,transient response capability, (202)586-2334 start-up time)in the design of reformers for the various Walter F.Podolski hydrocarbon fuels.Steam reforming,partial oxidation, Electrochemical Technology Program or combinations of these processes will be investigated. Argonne National Laboratory The outcome of the Phase I Feasibility Study will be 9700 S.Cass Avenue specifications for the reformer and hydrogen storage Argonne,IL 60439-4837 systems to be developed in Phase II.The Phase 11 (708)252.7558 . work will consist of the fabrication and test of the proof-of-concept reformer and 1-kg hydrogen storage Jeffery M.Bentley systems.This project is expected to be completed by Arthur D.Little November 1994. Acorn Park Cambridge,MA 02140 Publications (617)864-5770 R.Kumar,"Methanol Reformers for Fuel Cell Powered Vehicles:Some Design Considerations,"1990 Fuel Cell Seminar,Phoenix,AZ,November 25-28, 1990,pp. 76-79. R Kumar,"Requirements for a Fuel Cell for Transportation Applications;Proceedings, Workshop on Direct MethanollAir Fuel Cells,Georgetown University, Washington,DC,May 14-16, 1990. R.Kamer et al.,Reformers for the Production of Hydrogen from Methanol and Alternative Fuels for Fuel Cell Powered Vehicles,Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-92/31,August 1992. J.Bentley and P.Teagan,"Comparison of On-Board Reforming and Hydrogen Storage for Fuel Cell Powered Vehicles,"Program and Abstracts:1992 Fuel Cell DE93000010 Seminar,Tueson,AZ,Nov.29-Dec.2, 1992. November 1992 COUNTY SANRATION DISTIOCTS W ORANGE COUNTY. CAUFONNIA 10 CW AV UE no.Wo e+21 iOYNfNM VLLIEY.CLIliO11NIG 91Tl 127 `� n+n 2az2.n RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FEBRUARY 10, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. ri 1 PROCESSING DATE 1/L7/93 PAGE . F+ FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST uU0.KIN4 CAPITAL REPORT NUMBER AP%3 COUNTY SANITATION OISTRILTS OF ORANGE CODA IV CLAIMS PAID (1/13/93 POSTING DATE O1,13/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127012 AMERICAN TELEPnONL L TELEGRAPH $1,363.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 127013 ALFHA6AZ $4.540.41 SPECIALTY GAGES 127014 SLAKE P ANDERSON 156.02 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 121015 ABC LABORATORIES $2.492.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT 127016 PRATER SERVICES INC >5.-186.64 UNIFORM RENTALS 127017 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 3,841.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS 12703E ARROW TRUCK tlOD1ES 6 EUUIP >640.4. TOOL BOY 127019 AStlU RY ENVIRONMENTAL SCPY. f3A.233.21 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 127020 AMSA f375.44 T TRAINING REGISTRATION 2 127021 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSIN4 314.1b9.AJ PAYROLL PROCESSING BERVICE9 CJ 127022 AuaNDi G TROPHIES >38.79 PLAQUES 127023 BKK LANDFILL >3.bbi.b5 RESIDUALS SUPPLIES REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 227025 BAY SAFETY B SUPPLY f2.140.99 SAFETY BUPPLIE9 M 127026 BANANA CLA BLUEPRINT Yb$168.25 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES 3 12702E BATTERIYS LAWECI PUBTIESISNEPS ,625.64 PUBLICATION 127628 BATTERY SPECIALTIES >625..A LBATTERIES 00 12762E BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC f6441i.5b LAB RUENT P QO 127030 BEBCU SECURITY f91A.56 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127031 BELL SLLURITY 43.3Y9.66 TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES 127032 VT RONIXbILLARD INC $875.Q7 MACHINE REPAIRS n 127033 BOOTRBARN DATA MpiNiLNAN D! f2B5.06 COMPUTER DISC MAINTENANCE r 227034 BUOY BARN 5296.9E REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SNO69 f— 127035 MATLOOOKS EMPORIUM 3108.00 BOOKS E/LUMBER tJ 127035 GAR b0UK5 f10b.00 BOOKS 17703E GAMY G $TREED . 63.U20.49 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT N 127030 CLN CORPORATION f187.24 LAB SUPPLIES � 12703E CS COMPANY 95.2E B.bA VALVE PARTS 127039 JO NN CAROlLO ENGINEERS f91.519.69 ENCINBBRING SERVICES P1-36, PI-20 f") 127040 SUSIE CAVES f6.254.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL -1 127041 CENTURY SAFETY INST G SUPP $437.54 SAFETY SUPPLIES ON 127G42 THE COBB GROUP >115.12 SUBSCRIPTION 127043 COCA COLA FOODS DIVISION f25.685.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127044 COLE-PARMEA INSTRUMENT CO $262.15 LAB SUPPLIES 127045 COLICH AMC SONS >672.193.OL CONSTRUCTION I-9 227046 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA f1.477.54 PUMP PARTS 127047 COMPUSA. INC. f3.129.59 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 127C4b CONNELL GM FARTS / DIV f21.Sb TRUCK PARTS 127C49 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST f6002.99 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 12705E CUNTINCNIAL AIR IOULS INC $1.547.47 TOOLS 127051 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO S3.x32.50 CHLORINE 127052 CONTRACTOR-S BOOK STORL 5135.5C BOOKS 127053 CONTROLCO 4526.9. ELECTRIC PARTS 127054 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C 15.JS1.b2 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 12T055 COOPER INDUSTRIES IRE $411.24 MECHANICAL PARTS 127C56 COUNTY WHOLESALE LLELIRIC f7b5.V2 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 127057 CRANE VLYOR CORP $1.471.65 PLUMBING SUPPLIES ]a N FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL - PROCESSING DATE 1/07/93 PAGE COUNTY NUMBER AF93 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF 4AEE COUNTY CLAIMS CLAIMS PAID L1/13/53 POSTING DATE 4L/13/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 227058 STATE BOARD OF EQUILIZATION 1251.24 UNDERGROUND PURL STORAGE FEES 127059 OFFICE OF SELF-INS PLANS 335G.32 FRAUD PREVENTION 127060 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 458.96 TIRES 127061 HSK/DECKEM $212.31 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 227062 DE GUELLE 6 SONS GLASS CO 3171.7t GLASS 127063 DELL COMPUTER CORP 13,676.26 COMPUTER PARTS 127664 DEZURIM ANO/OR CS CU $167.1. VALVE n 127065 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 93.621.08 ANIONIC POLYMER N.0.8-12-92 'n 127066 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $750.48 PRINTING m 127067 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC 93.bUL.UC PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS C 127068 EIMCO PROCESS EQUIP CU 31.874.85 MBCHANICAL SUPPLIES 9 127069 EAGLE ENTERFRISLS s74 B.6L HARDWARE 22707C EASTMAN INC $661.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127071 ENCHANTER INC 54,480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 m 127072 ENVIRONMENTAL PROD. USA s2U6.97 CLEANER 3 127073 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC sL.003.14 LAB SERVICES 127074 FST SAND AND GRAVEL INC i391.35 ROAD BASS 00 127075 FALCON DISFOSAL SERVICE 37.L20.4N RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 127076 JOHN 6 FALKENSTEIN PC 33.400.00 CONSTRULTION SERVICES J-22-2, J-16 1 127077 FECEHAL EAPRESS LONP 4498.25 AIR FREIGHT ]a 12707E FERRELLGAS 1102.0U PROPANE 127079 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO 39,854.99 CHLORINATION PARTS r 127080 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $2.995.46 LAB SUPPLIES/FURNITURE 127081 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS 61.119.25 PUMP PARTS O 22TO82 FORMA SCIENTIFIC. INC. 35.1b9.25 LAB SUPPLIES CA 127083 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 418.u9 FILM —1 127084 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES $367.91 OFFICE FURNITURE .� 127085 FREEDOM IMAGING 31,3.98 SERVICE AGREEMENT c- 127086 FURON DEKORON 1.22.42 FREIGHT 127087 GANATL LUMBER CO $222.3b LUMBER N 127GBB GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 1463.1: ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 127089 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO 5763.Us TELEPHONE SERVICES 127090 GIBSON RESEARCH CO 935.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127091 GIERLICH-MITCHLLL INC 316.454.B2 MECHANICAL PARTS 127092 DON GREEK 6 ASSOCIATES s6.u60.0U SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 127093 HS TYPE 6 GRAPHICS $82.98 PRINTING 127694 HAAKER EQUIPMENT Co 5129.27 MECHANICAL PARTS 127095 MACH COMPANY $934.59 LAB SUPPLIES 127096 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTI $163.51 LAB SUPPLIBS 127097 HATCH a KIRK 114C $115.22 MECHANICAL PARTS 12T098 MAULAUAY CONTAINERS 31.480.04 CONTAINER RENTALS 127699 PL HAWN CO INC $213.69 ELECTRIC PARTS 12710C H1LT1 INC $1.643.8. TOOLS 1271C1 J.T. HORVATH 6 ASSOC. 32.352.40 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 3-23-1. P1-38-2 127202 RS HUGHES CO INC $1.300.51 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 1271D3 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH .546.65 WATER USE F IN FUND NO 9299 J7 DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE Ub7/93 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF UKANbE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID L1113/93 POSTING DATE L1/13/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT UESCRIPIION 127164 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER STA $177.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 227105 hVUROTEA 111E $3.410.66 OIL 127106 I A W 9 4120.J6 SUBSCRIPTION 227107 I D E R 4170.92 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 127108 1NG INDUSTRIES S59b.92 SNITCH 127109 INFERIAL ULST CNLMICAL $54.181.93 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-14-90 a 127110 INDUSTRIAL THKEADEO FRDUUCTS 6444.21 CONNECTORS m 127211 INGRAM PAPER 6J42.7V OFFICE SUPPLIES rn 127112 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $3,256.48 BATTERIES Z 127113 CITY OF IRVINE 4570.4. ADJUST MANHOLE GRADES D 127114 IRVINE RANCH LATEA UISTRICT 4154.8i WATER USE 127125 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUFP S1.124.26 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 127116 JIM-S SUSPLNSION ALRVICL $50.0C VEHICLE REPAIRS m 127117 JUhNSON POWLR OF NO.AMENICA 123,641.4, DRIVE SHAFT 3 127110 JOHNSTONE BUFFET $876.8, ELECTRIC PARTS 227119 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE C s13O.29 ELECTRIC PARTS 127120 KEMPER REAL ESTATE HURT CO 4150.06 REAL ESTATE LEGAL REVIEW 00 127121 KING HEARING INC S1.550.60 MACHINE SUPPLIES F 127222 KNOA INDUSTRIAL SUIFLIES 61.b11.94 TOOLS 127123 MARTIN KORDICK SR S..300.35 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 n 127224 LAKEWOOD INSTRUMENTS $2.238.55 INSTRUMENT PARTS r 127125 LANDMARK RESEARCH INT•L CORP 455.7b OFFICE SUPPLIES r 127126 LEGI-TECH $326.00 COMPUTER SERVICES C 127127 LEE 4 NO CONSULTING ENOR 17.b23.94 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-33 y 121126 LILBENT CASSIDY 4 FRIERSON S.3.491.9. ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 127129 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $933.33 OCEAN MONITORING A 12713G NOT BIOLOGIC COMPANY SL45.7N SERVICE AGREEMENT 127131 MPS $457.97 PHOTO SERVICES � 121132 MACOMCO S577.39 SERVICE AGREEMENT On227133 MANLLY`S BOILER REPAIR CO. INC $16.753.64 BOILER REPAIRS 127234 KANTER S766.49 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 127135 MARINE L VALVE SUPPLY $642.65 VALVES 127136 MARRIOTT HOTEL - ORLANDO 4..4i5.61 TRAINING REGISTRATION 127137 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 1356.11 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 127138 KICROAGE OF CERRITOS S417.15 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 127139 MIDWAY MFb 4 MACHINING S3.370.64 MECHANICAL PARTS 127140 MONTGOMERY BROTHERS INC 6402.22 LAB SUPPLIES 127141 JM MONTGOMERY ENGINEERS 4..756.14 ENGINEERING SERVICES 127142 MOORE PRODUCTS CO 41.1112.51 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 127143 MOORE 4 TABER S25.000.44 EMERGENCY PIPING REPAIRS 127244 NATIONAL BUSINESS bONLN`S 469.04 TRAINING REGISTRATION 121145 NATIONAL RENT A FENCE CU $771.8L FENCING RENTAL 127146 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION AS 6412.75 PUBLICATION 127147 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 169.35 SAFETY FILM RENTAL ` 127148 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS $744.79 SAFETY SUPPLIES 127149 NEW HERMES IIIC $115.03 PLASTIC SHEETING 2 n I w n 1 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE 1/.7/9] FALL V RLPGr COUNTY NUMBER AP4] COUNTY CLAI SANITATION 03STRINS OF ORANGE 1/1311 CLAIMS FAiU L3/13/93 POSTING UATL J/13/Y3 n WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 12715C NEWARK ELECTRONICS $271.19 HARDWARE 127251 CITY OF NEAPUbT BEACH f19.6b WATER USE ' 127152 NIAGARA CONSERVATION CORP. 358.63 WATER CONSERVATION SUPPLIES 127253 NORCAL CONTROLS INC 111.221.19 PUMP 127154 NOVELL RESLARCN ORDER DLSK 3269.56 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 227155 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES 4354.15 SAFETY GLASSES 127156 OFFICE PAVILION/INTLFIOR RES sN.Ob T.55 OFFICE FURNITURE a 127157 DA SYSTEMS CO fb2052.26 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 m 127158 ORACLE CORPORATION $3,180.89 TRAINING REGISTRATION m 127159 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C f8A.66 TRUCE PARTS Z 227166 COUNTY CLERK $25.06 AMNEYATION FEE O ]a 127162 ORANGE COURIER $631.01 COURIER SERVICES 127263 OSANGE VALVE • LI7TIN4 CO. S451.72 FITTINGS m 127164 OXYGEN LOCK • SAFC f51J2 SPYS EC m 127165 OXYGEN BLRVTCC 39.234.13 SPECIALTY GASES 3 1211E5 PACIFIC FARTS 31.761.05 FREIGHT 127167 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO s659.02 SAFETY ESERVICES SUPPLIES # 12716T PACIFIC BELL f13.24 I" INOCULATIONS BBIONS CIO 12716E PACIFIC WALK-IN CONICAL isbu.4G LAB INOCULATIONS i 127170 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING L 469.94 RENTAL BQUIPMBNT 127171 FAGTEL MERIDIAN SYS ILXS _ fJr$54.00 TELEPHONE SYSTEM UPGRADES Y 127172 PASENEI $52.39 PAGER RENTALS SUPPLIES U r 127172 PAK JEST $36.78 JANITORIAL eEPPL I69 f- 127173 PANAGUI. CABLE f36.95 CABLE SERVICES C 127175 PARTS RWICK TAU 41.820.90 TRUCKAUDIT PARTS y 127176 FEAT N-ELMER HAIG { CO S1.B20.YU AUDITING ERVEC88 N.0.3-13-91 127177 PIMA IN-ELMEM CORPORATION SG13.J6 LAB DSSUPPLIES 127178 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS IIIC i$13,035.36 RATIONALE REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 127179 POLYNURE INC f13.435.36 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-I1-92 �7 127186 PORTN CURE AND/ f26A.58 LAB SUPPLIES 127181 PORT SUPPLY s601.58 LAB BQUIPMBNT N L27182 POSTMASTER 1946.•] BOLE MAIL POSTAGE 127182 PRESSURE GROUT CO 121.000.44 GROUTING 86RVICEB 127164 THE HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE f128.46 ICE' 127165 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 11,740.GG INSTRUMENTATION REGISTRATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 127186 PROTOTYPE INC f1.7R0.46 TRAINING REGISTMTEON 127187 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY s667..G LANCING 127188 OULS7RON ELECTRIC COIF il.Ttl 5.44 LAB TRIOSUPPLIES 12718E RLN EI SHACK MOTORS 3A.973.1i ELECTRIC RAPAIR9 127190 RADIO GENTS 215.00 RURIMIIC PARTS 227191 THE REGENTS i2Y5.40 TMINING REGISTRATION ES 127192 RCJUIIAOLORLLAB SLFFLY f2.578.55 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 127192 RICH COLOR LAB i25.45 PRINTING 2719 R05ENOUNT/UN 1L4C 5/54.1b INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 127194 RYAN-NEMCU 3647. METAL 127195 SAFETY-ALEEN CORP f113.4LA4 PARTS CLEANER ]a ri V1 FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST 64 PK ING CAPITAL PR OC ESSI N6 OPIL 1/47/93 VALE o RLPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY S-N171TION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID W/13/93 POSTING DATE L1/1S/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT ULSLRIPIION 127196 SANCON ENGINEERING INC aL tl04.44 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 127197 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTILS 4195.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES . 127198 SEA COAST DESIGNS S1021.57 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 127199 CITY OF SEAL BEACH 1535.50 WATER USE - 127260 SHURELUCM SALES 15"48.06 HARDWARE 227201 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO aig4.6a LAB SUPPLIES 1272C2 SN17H-LMLRY CO S3r164.UG SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 h 227203 SOLMAR CORP 54.31U.4G CHEMICALS m 127204 SOUTHERN CALIf EDISON Co 49r7i4.66 POWER rri Z 127205 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO S%b.125.4C DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL tj 127266 SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 32.3L9.S5 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 12720T SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO INC 48.404.65 METER 127268 STAMEN 2 SPASSOFF FL a3.36G.GU ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 127269 WESTALLOY INC 1876.34 WELDING SUPPLIES rrI 127230 SPEAKER SUPPORT >128.12 PRESENTATION AIDS 3 127211 STANCOrS VACUUM SEPVCE S5S6.57 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 127212 STERLING ART $163.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127213 STROMbOTNE PRI..71NG S1.6U5.46 PRINTING 00 127214 SUKM IT STEEL a1 u41.LT METAL I 12T215 SUNSLT FORD $96.53 TRUCK PARTS 127216 SUFELCU INC 1641.3A LAB SUPPLIES n 127217 SUTER CHEM CORP $1,338.05 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES r 127218 TAVLOR-DUNN MPG COMPANY 51.283.78 TRUCK PARTS r 127229 TEKTRONIX INC 61r455.U5 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES c7 127226 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 12.588.6b MACHINE SUPPLIES (n 127221 TOODS LNTERPRISLS. INC. 48.775.16 RECONCILIATION REFUND 127222 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. a7b3.44 SERVICE AGREEMENT p 227223 TRAVEL TRAVEL $1.376.98 TRAVEL SERVICES 227224 TRUCK 6 AUTJ SUPPLY 1NL 92.445.59 TRUCK PARTS 127225 TUSTIN OOUGL S5bl.75 TRUCK PARTS N 127226 US AUTO GLASS CENTERS $55.89 TRUCK PARTS 127227 UNDERWATER KINLTICS S3g9.54 LAB SUPPLIES 127228 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S509.86 PARCEL SERVICES 127229 UNIVERSAL FLOORING SVSILMS $739.99 CARPETING 227230 VWR GCIEN7IFIC Sq.586.63 LAB SUPPLIES 127231 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO 1,315.5.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 127232 VALLLV DETH017 DILSLL $3,247.8, ENGINE PARTS 127233 VARY NOSTXAND REINHOLD 575.bi BOOK 127234 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 1275.32 LAB SUPPLIES 127235 VERNL-S PLUMBING 519.933.b0 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 127216 VILLAGE hUhSERIES $390.64 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 127237 VORTEX INDUSTRIAS $798.43 BUILDING MATERIALS 12723N WALL STRLE7 JOURNAL 1.41.77 PUBLICATION 127239 6ASHINGIUN STATL JLPT CCOLOGV $40.60 PUBLICATION 127240 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SOFTLY $21,885.3. CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92 127241 WESTIN ENGINLLRINW a-.426.94 ENGINEERING SERVICES LIT I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WURNINb CAFITAL FRUC"SING UATL 1/U7/93 FA6L E REFOWI NUMbLN AP43 COUNTY SANITATION D14TRIlTS OF ONANUL LUUNIV CLAIMS PAID L1/13/93 PUSTIN6 DAIL 01/13/93 WARRANT NO. VFNOUR AMOUNT ULSCNIPIION 127242 WHLSSOL VAWLC 16.547.44 FREIGHT 127243 ACRUR CORP i.b.a27.4u COPIER LEASES 127244 GEORGE YARDLEY CO Y577.uL INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 227245 JOHNSON IOAOGAWA CORP 1699.43 INSTRUMENT 127246 YORM INTERNATIONAL $260.43 ELECTRIC PARTS 127247 RICHARD YOUNG FRUU 1154.55 TAPES y 127248 2ALCM INC $6067.5, SOFTWARE SUPPORT ----------------- m m TOTAL CLAIMS PAID C1/11/93 $1,635.825.04 C7 n =444=444=4=====44 � m SUMMARY AMOUNT 3 � R1 CAP FAC FUND $340.00 Y2 OPER FUND $2,420.00 02 CAP FAC FUND 24,716.33 I 03 OPER FUND $29,$39.85 43 CAP FAC I) 719.87 n 45 OPER FUND $408.79 r 45 CAP FAC FUND ,999.60 f— 47 OPER FUND $7,330.08 O R7 CAP FAC FUND 57,$59.33 411 OPEN FUND 111 .80 414 OPER FUND 4627.09 419 CAP FAC FUND 49 103.44 8566 OPER FAC $235.65 t"V 456E CAP FAC FUND ,060.62 R667 OPER FUND 82, $14.40 N 47 619 OPER FUND 434.71 JT OPER FUND $423$970,961.11 SELFCORP E970,350. 2 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE LFUNDSFWD $785.88 JT DIET WORBING GPITAL FUND 4190,705.00 ------------------- $1,635,825.04 a FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCLSSINS DAIL 1/22/93 PAbE 1 R EPOM7 UUMWEN AP43 COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS OF 4MAN4E COUNTY CLAIMS PAID L1/17/93 POSTING DATE L1,17193 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127283 A4 TECH COMPANY s64.317.1u RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 127204 A T 6 1 6.99.33 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 127285 ACLU-LABS RESEARCH INC $230.00 LAB SERVICED 127286 ACTION ELECTRONICS $72.43 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 127287 ADVANCU CONSTRUCTORS INC 6823.704.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-3 127206 AIR PRODUCTS L CHEMICAL IN $17.432.66 O&M AGREEMENT 03Y. GEN GIST M.O.8-9-89 y 1272P.9 ALBLRTSON-S MARKET 46L4 b3bb.52 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT M 121290 ALUERTSONS 86iL 1971.63 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT Z 127291 ALbER7SONS INC 0193L $1,793.99 USER FEB OVERPAYMENT C 127292 ALL METALS fROCL851N6 $84.36 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT y 127293 ALLIED PACIFIC s16.118.02 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127294 ALPMANETICS INC 6990.49 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127295 AMEIRICAN DIETARY PRODUCTS $149.49 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT FIT 227296 AMERICAN SERVICE INDUSTRIES b217.38 MECHANICAL PARTS 3 127297 AMLRICAN 116NA f1.073.7u METER PARTS 12729E ME7EMA INC $/.652.10 MECHANICAL PARTS W127299 ANABOLIC INC 41.1/8.64 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT! 127306 ANAHEIM CAR WASH s229.6b USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 1 1273C1 ANAHEIM CITRUS PRODUCTS $50.b72.90 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1273C2 ANAHEIM INTERNATIONAL INK $189.37 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127303 ANAHEIM MOTEL 533.75 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT r 127304 ANAHEIM ROYAL INC $309.76 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127305 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL 4140.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT t% 127306 A-PLUS SYSTEMS $953.31 NOTICES & ADS y227367 ADC LABORATORIES 62.395.WV LAB SERVICES 12730E AQUATIC TES71N6 LABORATORY S1.P50.66 LAB SERVICES 127309 ARATEK SERVICES INC 17.50 UNIFORM RENTALS 127310 AR120NA INSTRUMENT $1,410.92 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES --A 127311 ARROWHEAD FURITAS WATER$ SI68.63 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT CO 127312 ARTS DISPOSAL SERVICE INC b450.60 HAZARDOUS WASTE REMOVAL 127313 ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES b415.6G LAB SERVICES 127314 AREA 5375.Lu REGISTRATION FEES 127315 AWARDS S TROPHIES $303.75 AWARD PLAGUES 127316 SEA LANDFILL $4,097.76 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 197317 &RW SAFETY S SUPPLY bl.b36.01 SAFETY SUPPLIED 127318 bANCNOFT-WHITNEV CU 4244..4 PUBLICATION 127319 BANK OF THE WEST 639.656.71 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION J-23-2 191320 bARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS s8b.bu PUBLICATIONS 127321 B BATEMAN $600.60 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 127322 DAUER COMPRESSOR $759.17 COMPRESSOR PARTS 197393 DARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC $6.167.95 LAB SUPPLIES 127324 BEACH-LIN CAR WASH $30.94 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127325 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES INC. s388.92 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127326 B1HR FRUCE5S CORP - $2,171.87 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127327 ROBERT bEIN LILLIAH FROST b2.648.77 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-33 12732E BELL SECURITY $5..24.40 TEMP. SERVICES - CENTRAL GEN N to 1 TJ7 1N FUND NO 9399 - JT U15T YOPKIN4 CAPITAL FRUCESSING DATE 1/22/93 FADE 2 PEFUNT BOMBER AF 97 CuLhTVSANITATION D/SINICT$ OF UAN6! GOUN19 CLAIMS P CLAIMS PAIDD D •1/27/93 POSTING DALE L1/17/93 / WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127329 814CYCLE s5b.6U SUBSCRIPTION 127330 BIShuf CUNPANY 1666.8, TOOLS 127331 BLACK BOA CORP $199.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127332 BLACKWELL SCIENTIFIC 565.4. LAB SUPPLIES 127333 008-S LAUNDROMAT 452.84 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 127334 KEVIN BOJAN $605.63 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127335 B00T BARR s329.2U REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES y 127336 NOVEL ENUINLERIN4 CORP 551,647.69 ENGINEERING SERVICES 7-19, 5-37-3 m 121333 BRIGHT ARMOR FLATING se.75 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT Z 127338 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC 43,539.59 ELECTRIC PARTS C 127339 BROADWAY MOTEL, s2B6.75 USER FEB OVERPAYMENT y 127340 BROWN 6 CALDWELL CONSULTING s1T.542.03 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-12-1 127341 BUDGET JANITORIAL 5..650.C6 JANITORIAL SERVICES 127342 BUILOCROS EMPYhl UM 6177.0E HARDWARE/LUMBER m 127343 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFF $347.50 PUBLICATIONS $ 127344 BUNKE EN 6INEERING CO 12.573.98 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127345 BUSH AND ASSOCT AYES INC 44 ob.G9 BURVSYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 7L 127346 GARY 6 STREEO si.i33.61 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 00 127347 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY $183.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12734E CEIA - 6l9G.9G LAB SUPPLIES 127349 C M 1 s2.395.29 METER >0 227350 CRC PRESS INC $273.90 LAB SUPPLIES r 127351 CS COMPANY s1.605.69 VALVES r 127352 CAL-CDMPACK FOODS 63.490.6h USER FEE REFUND Ly 127353 CALTNOL INC s2.286.67 REGULATOR PARTS 127354 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC 5..477.5b TRUCK REPAIRS Cn 127355 CANDY CANE MOTEL 6279.22 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 127356 JOHN CAROLED ENGINEERS $4,596.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES 127357 CASE SWAVNE CO.. INC. 32.175.2b USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127358 CAVALCADE ESCROW CORP 6304.UA ESCROW FEES 127359 CENTRE BRAINS INC. 32O7.27 OBBR FEE OVERPAYMENT N 12736C CMAFMAN HOSPITAL s25.72 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127361 CHURCH ENGINEERING INC s16.620.b6 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-RI 127362 CINEOUMC ThLATMES s917.51 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127363 CIRCUIT INGUSIRIES si.677.32 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127364 CIRTECM INC. 02 squo.53 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127365 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING $1.322..6 TRUCK LIFT 127366 CLLAN CITY LAUNDRIES 436.95 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127367 C0AST FIRE LUDIPMLNT $201.23 SAFETY SUPPLIES 127368 COASTALMOT/ON 511584.04 MEMBERSHIP DUES 127369 COIN LAUNDRY 5733.0 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127370 COIN LAUNDRY 1116.lu USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 127371 COLE-PARMER IN57RUMENT Cu $258.78 LAB SUPPLIES 127372 COr..MCRCIAU DOOR OF O.C.. INC. SJG5.bb BUILDING REPAIRS 127373 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS LF CA 5899.43 COMPRESSOR PARTS 127374 COMPUSA. INC. $718.61 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE N �G V.l FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WURRING CAPITAL FROCLSSIN6 DATE 1/2L/93 PALL 3 a REPORT NUMOiN AP63 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANbE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID e1/27/93 POSTINb GAIL 01/27/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESLFIILIUN 1273T5 CONNECTOR TECHNOL06V CG 45s.92 USER FRS OVERPAYMENT 12737b CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL LIST $0,591.45 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 127377 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 41.972.56 TOOLS 12737E CONTINENTAL WESTERN WATER ib.296.91 USER FES OVERPAYMENT 127379 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS D C $1.376.94 SOIL TESTING 127350 CORONADO SGUARL 495.74 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 227381 COSMOTRUNIC f5u5.A• USER FEE OVERPAYMENT a 127392 COSTA MESA AUTO STIFFLY 5919.6Z TRUCK PARTS 'n 127363 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 4573.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES F17 127389 CROSBY L OVERTON INC. SI05.uOu.uu OIL SPILL CLEAN-UP M.O.1-13-93 2 O 127386 CROCKSTATE TO CONLKCALIFORNIAs15.95O.19 USER FEU OVERPAYMENT TAXES a 127307 STATE OF CALFORIA 31.$42.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE IMES 127388 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1/2.D0 HAZARDOUS WASTE TA%ES � 127369 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $1/0.13 DIESELHAZARD USE TAXES 171 127390 STALL OF CALIFORNIA i$63.O5 HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR TAXES 3 127391 DAILY PILOT 166.75 NOTICES 9 G S At 127392 DAMES IE L NTIRE f3$218.60 RUINBERIN0 SERVICES P1-38-3 00 121393 DATA CI TIRE SERVICE $606.33 TRUER TIR89 127393 DATA CIRCUITS if06.33 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1 127395 DATA JON ENTERPRISES 189.06 USER F88 OVERPAYMENT 3a 127396 DE LE STE ENTERPRISES $1b IT0.06 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT r 127397 DEL ES IE MOBILE ESTATES $170.13 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1— 127396 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS i169.13 LAB 9UPPLI89 12739E CALIF. DEAN OF FISH L SAME 6662.4D LAKE/STREAM SUPPLIES ALTERATION AGREEMENT 2-9-R1 127399 DEZURIN AND/OP CS CO 33.363.32 MIMIC BUPPL I69 N 127401 DIATEG ENVIRONMENTAL 33.63:.36 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-12-92 70 127602 DICEONGITA ELECTRONICS INC 49.363.43 USER F88 EQUIPMENT OVERPAYMENT .'O 127603 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP $$1,006.95 OFFICE BQUIPMBNT 127603 DIGITAL TECNNI6U Ef. INC.ING. fiSbli.76 TELEPHONE 127606 DOCTORS CUNP $301.63 OFFICE EQUIPMENT y 1276L5 DORADO EHOSPITALNTERPRISES OF SIN TA ANA .301.85 USER F86 OVERPAYMENT 127606 DOVERO EVATORR ISLE INC f99820.00 PLANT OR MINANCB 6 REPAIRS 127607 BONER ELEVATOR COMPANY .120.00 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 1276C8 OUXO EOWAPOCORP 61$177.78 PAINT SUPPLIES 127609 DURO-ECHNI CORPO .363.97 USER FEE AO PARTS 127611 DTL TECHNIQUE f1.363.97 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127612 E F HPROCESS sbq.b3 USER FEE IC OVERPAYMENT 127413 EIMCO PROCESS ECU IP CO $2.593.35 MECHANICAL PARTS 127613 EAS EE RV INCS INC 32.633.35 ENGINEERING IERVIC88 J-23-2 127415 EASTMAN INC f7$695.41 OFFICE 9UPPLI89 127416 EAST06ft CENTER 1696.61 USER CFEEAT OVERPAYMENT 127617 ECONOMICS PRESS INC 52.$78.29 PUBLICATION 127618 EL TOROITU INCILL 0227 600.60 USER FEE O MONITORING H.T 127419 ENCHANTER I 32$835.66 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 127919 ENGINEERED STORAGE ib SYSTEMS .835.6E OFFICE FURNITURE 127920 ENVIRONMENTAL NESOU RCL ASSOC 51.04 S.1u LAB SERVICES a 1 W a I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIET WORKING CAPITAL FROCLSS ING DATE 1/1./94' FAGS r REPORT NUNtlEh AP43 C UAV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CQUNIT CLAIMS PA CLAIMS LptD C1/il/93 PU6T IN6 DATE U/11/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR - AMOUNT - OLS[MIPT/ON 127421 ESSENCE LROUP 53.40.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127422 EXTENDED CARE HOSIITAL 4350.93 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127423 MARSHALL IAINNLS aa.S.bb DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 127424 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 45.980.U1l RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 127425 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 4519.56 AIR FREIGHT 127426 FERRELLGAS ilb.55 PROPANE 127427 FILTER SUFFLV Cu 1141..8 FILTER n 1274LS FISCHER a PUNTER CU 44.834.91 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 127429 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO a543.93 LAB SUPPLIES - ITT 127430 FISONS INSTRUMENTS s1.139.26 LAB SUPPLIES Z 127431 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. 11.670.56 CONCRETE CUTTING tl 127432 FLICKINGER CO s26L.11 VALVES Y 127433 FLO-SYSTEMS 11.25U.72 PUMP PARTS 127434 CLIFFORD A FORKLkT 4...4.5.9. SURVEYING SERVICES H.O.6-10-92 127435 FOSS ENVIRONMENTAL $1.006.44 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PIT 127436 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $149.51 FILM S 127437 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 1267.4L PAINT SUPPLIES # 127438 FOUNTAIN VALLEY REGIONAL HUSP $6,090.39 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 00 127439 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES Sb S.39 MECHANICAL PARTS 127440 FREDERICK PUMP 6 ENGINLEKIN 5574.bG CHLORINATION PARTS 127441 FREEDOM 1MAGINu 865.84 LAB SUPPLIES y 127442 BUD FREY $21.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION C- 127443 FRYERS AUTO SPAS 928.64 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT r 127444 CITY OF FULLERTON $44.66 WATER USE O 127445 FUROR DEMUR" 422.4E FREIGHT 127446 GRC RESTAURANTS INC.. 016 $126.46 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT Cn 127447 EST. INC. $465.46 PRINT SUPPLIES -1 127446 GANAHL LUMBER CO 406.61 BUILDING MATERIALS 127449 GARRATT-CALLAh AN COMPANY 53.053.64 CHEMICALS f7 127450 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLLRS s506.0G FIBERGLASS INSTALLATION --1 127451 GEMINI INDUSTRIES 37.746.6: USER FEE OVERPAYMENT Cn 127452 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO lsb G.66 SERVICE AGREEMENT 127453 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 4195.43 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 127454 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO 54.626.06 TELEPHONE SERVICES 127455 6EORGE s SONS COIN-OF LAUNDRY $744.53 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127456 6EORGL LEECH 6 ASSOCIATES a541.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 127457 GIEKLICH-MIICHELL INC s2.122.3G MECHANICAL PARTS 127459 GOLOENGEST LAUNDRY 4211.85 USER PER OVERPAYMENT 127459 GRANDE TORTILLA sb094.32 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12146C GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS a1.736.60 CAMERAS/FILM 127461 DUN GREEK 6 ASSOCIATES s3.553.OG SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 127462 GRUTH EQUIPMENT CORP 5118.74 FREIGHT 127463 GROVE INVESTMENT s37.93 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127464 THE GROVE MOTEL $155.63 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127465 GULLIVERS $588.67 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 1274.6 h A S MANAGCMENI s9bl.Ob USER FEE OVERPAYMENT tz 1 s Ln FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST UDPKIN6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/.i/93 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP 9] COUNTY/ SANITATION DISTRICTS OF UALi COUNTY CLAIMS PAIDD CII CS/2I D /47 POSTINW AIt L1/27/93 WARRANT NO. VLNUUR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127467 HSU TECHNOLOGY $356.928.39 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2 127468 1HL HICMAHL A hALL COMIANY $5.431.63 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 127469 HALVORSEN-STRIP SHOPPING CHI $759.63 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT' 127470 FRED A HARPER 61.50U.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 121471 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASH $1.444.57 MECHANICAL PARTS 197472 HATCH S KIRK INC 4566.4b MECHANICAL PARTS y 127473 HEALTHCARE MEDICAL CENTER 1269.15 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT m 127474 HEWLETT PACKARD 4690.U6 SERVICE AGREEMENT m 127475 HILTI INC 5993.5N TOOLS C 127476 J.T. HORVATH 6 Assoc. 436.36.61 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1 3a 197477 AS HUGHES CO INC $539.12 PAINT SUPPLIES 127470 HUNTER CORPORATION $344,326.13 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 127479 CITY OF HUNTINGTON bEACH 4i2.991.25 WATER USE 121100 HUNIINGION BCH CORY HOSPITA $50.87 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127481 MU Ni IN6 TOh 6EALH PUNDER STA 433.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127482 HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO $342.60 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127483 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY $35.02 HARDWARE 00 121484 HYATT NEUPURTEk 64.338.6V USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127405 IMD INDUSTRIES $163.27, ELECTRIC PARTS 127486 IDEAL UNIFORM RENTAL SERVIC 4500.88 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT n 127487 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $13,640.36 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.1. _,A-90 r &STABS INDEPENDENT CATERING 4176.41 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127489 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MFGS $87.65 CASKET 17 12749C INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 61.126.91, CONNECTORS N127491 INN AT THE PARK 65.293.53 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ,i 127492 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $556.73 BATTERIES �y 127493 INTERSTATE ENGINEERING $790.96 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127494 ISLANDER MOTEL $26.33 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT C-)-I� 127492 JLA CREDIT CURP 6145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE N 12749E JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO $42.67 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127497 JUhNSTUNE SUPPLY 42.654.54 ELECTRIC PARTS 127490 JONES CHEMICALS INC 47.6B3.ifi CHEMICALS 127499 NATHAR MF6 $4,407.12 USER FEB OVERPAYMENT 121SLO KEENAN A ASSOCIATES $4,950.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1275G1 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS 61.444.i6 PUMP PARTS 1275C2 KINNHILL RUBBER 03.626.41 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127563 KNO4 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $3,511.84 TOOLS 127504 MARTIN KORDICA SR $3,144.86 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 1-9 1275CE KRAFT U.S.A. 483.715.YY USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127506 LA FITNESS ANAHLIM INC. 6907.6b USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1275G7 LA PALMA . INTLR HOAR N.223.5T USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127508 LA OUINTA MOTUR INN $2,349.14 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127509 LANDMARK SANK 4557.62 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127526 LAUNDERLAND Al $173.94 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127511 LAUNDERWOPLO •1.160.9i USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127512 CHARLES P. CROWLEY Co. 4860.17 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES is W Ln bo I CA FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCLSSIN6 DATE 1/ii/93 FALL u REFONT NUMBER AP43 LUUNIV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF UkANGL COUNTY CLAIMS &AID -1/i 7/93 POSTING DAIL 61/ii/93 WARRANT N0. VLNDOR AMOUNT ULSCRLPIIDN 127513 CRC PRESS INC. 6.7.4b PUBLICATION 127514 KP LINDSTROM INC 66015.97 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 127515 LORAIN PRODUCTS 61.324.57 RELIANCE POWER SERVICE AGREEMENT 127516 LOS ANGELES TIMES 466.76 NOTICES 6 ADS 127517 M.N.L. LAUNDRY >407.1i USER PER OVERPAYMENT 12751E MPS 684.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES a 227519 MPS PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICL 61.72b.W8 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT G7 127526 RACOMCO 1403.61 SERVICE AGREEMENT FIT 127521 HAG SYSTEMS $24.73 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES Z 127522 MAGIC LAMP HOTEL $375.06 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT C 127523 MANLEY•S BOILER REPAIR CO, INC 61.509.it BOILER PARTS D 217524 808-S BIG LOT $454.24 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127525 MARTIN LUTHER HOSPITAL $743.94 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT --1 127526 MASK TECHNOLOGY 6585.34 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT FT1 197527 MATT - CHLOR INC 57,700.95 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 3 12752E MC CURDY CIRCUITS INC. tl2 $570.53 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127529 MC DONALOS OF AMERICA LAi9.46 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT OD 127536 MC GAW. INC. SbG.379.49 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127531 M C P FOODS ♦2,219.56 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1 127532 METRO CAR WASH $151.04 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT y 127533 MICEL INC 63.11B.T3 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT f— 127534 MIDLAND MFG CORM 67..85.97 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES f— 127535 MIDWAY MFG L MACHINING $2.015.60 MACHINE PARTS O 127536 MISSION INDUSTRIES $519.78 UNIFORM JACKETS 127537 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO 471.66 METER Cn 127538 MONITOR PLATING $464.54 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT --1 127539 MONITOR PUBLISHIN6 CO $165.64 SUBSCRIPTION 127540 MONTGOMERY LAbURATORIES S.B.216..L LAB SERVICES M.0.5-8-91 c-X 127541 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES .204.67 CELLULAR TELEPHONE USAGE --1 127542 MOTOROLA CELLULAR 6ROUP 62.173.61 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SYSTEM Cn 127543 RUDY•S NUN02 LAUN0h1E5 S458.3b USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127-44 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION AS S8.4b PUBLICATION - 127545 NESLAB INSTRUMENTS $3.570.79 LAB SUPPLIES 127546 NEU HCRILONS CONFUTER CLNIL 61.dB6.0V TRAINING R8GISTRATION 127547 NE.FORT DUNES INC $6.362.6G USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127540 NONDSTNUM 6220.1. USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127549 OCL REFRu6kAPhIOS INC 694.2t USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12755E OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE A 6415.0L SUBSCRIPTION 127551 THE Oh MART COAT S1.379.66 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127552 OK SYSTEMS CO $64.627.29 CHLORINE M.O.11-18-92 127553 ORACLE CORPORATION $5.931.96 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 127554 GRANGE CoUkTY AUTO PANTS C 6166.81 TRUCK PARTS 127555 ORANGE COUNTY FAIR S LAPU CIA 68.310.19 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127556 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUVFIY L 6A.766.23 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 127EST ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING LO. $2.313.59 FITTINGS 127555 OXYGEN SERVICE 52.131.5i SPECIALTY GASES b0 aF 1 S FUND NO 9199 - JT DIET WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING UATL ./—/91 PAGE 7 REPORT COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS OF ORANGE, COUNTY NUNbEP AF9! CLAIMS PAID L1/27/93 POSTING DAIL CI 7193 WARRANT N0. VEND0R AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127559 COUNTY OF ORANGE 60.360.3E SERVICE AGREEMENT - RADIOS 127560 C064TY OF ORANGE i.9.14.04 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 127561 ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD 655.000.4E SIPHON CONSTRUCTION 127562 CSUOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL 1 $200,400.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE 227563 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 62K70.17 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 127564 PSI REPAlk SLRYICE6 INC 5329.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS n 127565 PSSI 61.L6O.LO SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 127566 PACIFIC PARTS S1.C89.13 INSTRUMENT PARTS Fri 127567 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 919694.1i SAFETY SUPPLIES 127560 PACIFIC BELL 51.07502 TELEPHONE SERVICES a 127569 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C $48.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 12757E PACTEL MLRIOIAh SYSTEMS A6a9b.CL SERVICE AGREEMENT 127571 FAURE JANITORIAL SUPP $195.0.87 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES T127572 PAGENET A50.00 PAGER RENTALS 3 197573 FAK WEST 4136.07 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 127574 R.F. PAULUS9 INC i119btl0.O4 PIPING INSTALLATION # 127575 ROW PENDERGRAFT A46U.44 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 00 127576 PEIROPRIIE 49i.3b USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 1275577 PHYSIOTRONICS CORP. USA 5156.50 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 12757E PIMA ORO SYSTEMS INC 6163./77.L3 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 Y 127519 PIINLY BOWLS S11792.15 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT r, 127580 PITNEY BORES CREDIT CORP $373.49 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 127561 PLACENTIA LINDA CORM NOSPII 60.380.93 USER FHB OVERPAYMENT 1y 127582 FLOVCLAO LAMINATES INC. $564.17 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT IS7583 POLYMETRICS9 INC. $63,200.26 LAB EQUIPMENT M.0.6-20-92 y 127504 POLYPUML' INC 431,801.45 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 1 197505 PRENTICE - WALL INC $102.50 PUBLICATION 127586 HAAOLD PRIMROSE ICE 692.L4 ICE n 127507 FRINTRONIA $129.25 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT —1 127568 PROFESSIONAL TREE CARE $600.60 LANDSCAPING N 127569 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CD. A5.00.O0 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17791 127590 PROTOTYPE INC 3S.9ia.i5 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 127591 PUBLIC RISK MGMT ASSOC $196.00 PUBLICATION 127592 PURE CHEW PRODUCTS 6601.32 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127593 QUALITY BUILDING bUPPLV $83.72 BUILDING MATERIALS 127590 RAINNUW DISPOSAL CO A..673.96 TRASH REMOVAL 127595 RECYC INC 600.911.5b RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-13-91 127596 RED WING SHOES 6337.91 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 127597 THE REGISTER 519001.90 NOTICES 6 ADS 12759E REISH MARINE STUDIES, INC A19600.00 OCEAN MONITORING 127599 REMOIE METER RESETTING SVSI $5,600.06 POSTAGE 12760E MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY 61.20O.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES I2T601 kESLARCH PRODUCTS INI. CORP SB91..b LAB SUPPLIES 127602 RUBY INN MOTEL 5067.99 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127603 SIR RUUIMAR MOTEL 6369.16 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127604 PE66Y RUPP A590.LL DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 4 W 1 V s FUND NO 9199 - JT WSi WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING LATE 1/2i/93 FADE b EY bUMtlLh AY 47 COUNTYSANITATION DISTRICIS OF uDAN6i CFOUA TV CLAIMS PAID 61/27/93 POSTING DAZE bl/27/93 / WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127605 RUSTY PELICAN a170.u4 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 127666 S L C OIL CORP a440.b6 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT, 127607 S A J CHEVROLET 3b89..3 TRUCK PARTS 127608 SKC VEST s730.54 LAB SUPPLIES 127609 S S 5 PLATING a759.43 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127610 SABATASSO FOOD INC 43.120.7b USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127611 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP a520.26 PARTS CLEANER a 127612 SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA a427.47 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES m 127613 SANCON ENGINEERING INC $5.350.69 ENGINEERING SERVICES Z127614 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS $1,667.42 ELECTRIC MOTORS C 127615 SANTA ANA ENGRAVING CO. $56.64 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT y 127616 SARBS-YUC a48.Vu PUBLICATION 127617 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS a5.:i4.57 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 127626 SARTORIUS CORP 1675.00 LAB SUPPLIES 127619 DOUG SARVIS a1.575.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING T 127626 THE SCHOOLEN CO a240.W0 APPRAISAL SERVICES 7-14 3 127621 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT-L i41.378.63 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-30-92 it 127622 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES INC 45.581.45 SPECIALTY GASES 00 127E23 - SECURITY SPECIALISTS a1.506.06 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 127624 SEES COLOR IEATILES INC 410.258.6b USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127625 SCMICUA 4272.14 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127626 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $802.76 TOOLS t— 121627 SHELL OIL COMPANY 52.528.b6 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT t— 127628 SHURELUCK SALES 39.224.10 MECHANICAL PARTS p 127629 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO a400.65 LAB SUPPLIES 127630 SILVER MOON MOTEL $411.75 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127631 SILVERI 6 LE SOUEF a43.158.6C CONSTRUCTION 7-14-1-1 A 127632 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI $711.50 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 127633 SMITH PIPE A SUPPLY INC 519.30 PLUMBING SUPPLIES (l 127634 SOFT WATER WASH fi49.58 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127635 SOLDER STATION ONE a62.bL USER PEE OVERPAYMENT 127636 SOLDER TECHNOLOGY 415.31 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127637 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $433,663.59 POWER 121638 SO CAL GAS CO a24.079.79 NATURAL GAS 127639 SOUTHERN CALIF TRANE SEM $54.99 PAINT SUPPLIES 127640 $O CALIF WATLR CO a44.3L WATER USE 127641 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CC $13.277.90 DIESEL FUEL 127642 SOUTHWEST FOODS INC. $144.93 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127643 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCE SYS a4.92O.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 127644 SPLEDY CIRCUITS INC $109.24 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127645 SPEA INDUSTRIES INC 5.063.73 LAB SUPPLIES 127646 STAGE STOP MOTEL 4637.2- USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127647 STARbUCK- TRUCK REFINISHING 42,725.06 TRUCK PARTS 127648 STATE COLLEGE CAR WASh $14.56 USER FEB OVERPAYMENT 127649 STATEK CORP $1,921.70 USER PER OVERPAYMENT 127650 STEPAN COMPANY $45.970.52 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT CO FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST VUXhING CAFITAL FROCLSSIN6 DATE 1/22/91 PAGE 9 "FORT NUMS,R AP43 CUb NTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF URAN6E COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 61/27193 POSTING DATE 41/27/93 WARRANT NO. VENDUR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127651 STERLING ANT 156.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127652 STEVENS FUbLISHIN6 CURE 3199..4 SUBSCRIPTION 127653 STINSON ELECTRIC SFECIALTY C $203.95 ELECTRIC PARTS 127654 SUMMER400D CENTER $57.60 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127655 SUMMIT STEEL $5.360.65 STEEL 127656 SUNSET FORD s41.Tb TRUCK PARTS 127657 SWPELCO INC 61,194.63 LAB SUPPLIES y 127658 SUFER CIRCUTS $110.13 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT Gl 127659 SUR-LITE CORPORATION 421.463.82 GAS FURS TESTING M.0.8-10-92 TT7 127666 TAYLOR-DUNN NFL COMPANY S2.439.24 TRUCK PARTS Z 127661 TEXAS COMMENCE BANK S10.364.76 TRUSTEE SERVICES M.0.11-14-90 10 127662 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL 6844.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS a 127663 SO THOMAS INC 43.987.10 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 127664 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 4SBS..4 MSCKANICAL PARTS m 127665 THRIFTY COIN-OP LAUNDRY $112.41 USSR F8S OVERPAYMENT 3 127666 TOLEUO SCALE CORP. 1930.40 SERVICE AGREEMENT 127667 TONY-S LOCK S SAFE SERVICE 3240.57 BUILDING REPAIRS � 127668 TRAFFIC CONTR6L SERVICE INC s2.610.0U CONSTRUCTION LANE CLOSURES 127669 FRAME $1.676.35 PAINT SUPPLIES 1 127610 TRAVELO06E TIFFANY INN S195.b3 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127671 TRIPLE N PACKING $2.699.45 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 227672 TROPICANA INN 439130.b6 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT r 127673 TRUCK S AUTO SUPPLY INC $5.246.51 TRUCK PARTS 127674 JG TUCNER S SON INC $8,641.88 INSTRUMENT PARTS C7 127675 UCI IRVINE 5330.3E USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT N 127676 US AUTO GLASS CENTERS $55.89 TRUCK PARTS 127677 U.S. FOSTAL SERVICE $109.96 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 12767E US POSTAL SERVICE S21.b1 USER PER OVERPAYMENT 127679 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE S362.8b PARCEL SERVICES 127660 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 4146.75 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT CA 127681 VOC TESTING $5.000.00 EMISSIONS TESTING 227682 VWR SCIENTIFIC $2,460.57 LAB SUPPLIES 127683 VACATIONLANU 43.233.8E USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127684 VALLEY CITIES SUPFLY CO 59,736.47 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1276E5 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL $483.56 GENERATOR REPAIRS 127666 VAN WATER .4 ROGERS t1.529.45 CHEMICALS 127647 VANIER bUSINESS FORMS $490.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127688 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 42.991.95 LAB SUPPLIES 127689 VERNE•S PLUMBING S100.Ou PUMP PARTS 127690 VERTEX SYSTEMS S845.40 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 127691 WARREN GORHAM L LAMONT INC $128.71 PUBLICATION 127692 WATER ENVIRONMENT FEU. 4.9.25 PUBLICATION 127693 WELLS MARINE s9.L44.3U USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127694 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 425,493.61 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.0-12-92 127695 VHESSOE VAREC. INC. $726.54 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 127696 VILLUAN ASSOCIATES s11.505.1a ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-31 tz �+ PLND NO 9199 - J7 GIST 60R8ING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1122193 PAGE 1, CJ REPURT NUMBER AP43 CUUNIV SANITA71ON DISTRICTS OF UNAN6E CUUN77 CLAIMS PAID i1/27/93 POSTING 00.1E C1/27/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127697 WIHONICS CORP $3,235.14 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 127698 ROURKE A WOUORUPF A OR 163,314.61 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.$-19-92 127699 W06BY-S WHARF $573.29 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 12770E WORLD CITRUS WEST INC S1.588.77 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127701 XEROX CORP 3279.61 COPIER LEASES 1277C2 TELLUW FREIGHT SYSIEMS .113.72 FREIGHT 1277C3 JOHNSON TUK0GAWA CORP S1.126.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 7a 127764 2IEBARTN A ALPEN/C.S. ALPER S35,U40.46 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 m 127705 2VMARM CORP. S25.i17.G4 WORKSTATION, AUTOTRACE m 127706 RICHARD b EDGAR $200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION Z a _ TOTAL CLAIMS FALL UI/27/93 S4.Ib:.b69.b7 � ccccccc cc ccs ecce_ m 3 0000 SUMMARY AMOUNT 02 OPEN FUND $1,715.72 Y2 OPEN FUND $12,762.91 r Y2 CAP PAC FUND $34,392.76 r Y3 OPER FUND $33,624.41 C Y3 CAP PAC FUND $64.00 05 OPEN FUND 85,209.6E N Y5 CAP FAC FUND $3,190.37 Y6 OPEN POND $872.96 Y7 OPER FUND $3,234.47 f7 Y7 CAP FAC FUND $112,051.51 1 Y11 OPER FUND $13,216.80 N Y13 OPER FUND $75.38 Y14 OPER FUND $207.29 #14 CAP FAC FUND $9,099.23 Y566 OPEN FUND $1,694.12 Y566 CAP PAC FUND $43,002.70 Y667 OPEN FUND $32.31 07614 OPEN FUND $6,602.85 JT OPER FUND $1,221,939.47 CORP $1,873,435.73 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS 8226,462.83 JT WORKING CAPITAL $578,787.33 ------------------- $4,101,664.87 CC COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS January 13, 1993 0 ORANGE CaUNTY, CAUFORNIA 108K EWE>VEM)E M E M O R A N D U M EG.BOX 0127 MWAIN VALLEY,C UFONNIA 8272"127 0141EE24411 TO: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager FROM: Katherine Yarosh, Senior Buyer SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF TWENTY-FIVE (25) SETS OF FILTER MEDIA (BELTS), SPECIFICATION NO. P-130 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, January 12, 1993, for the Purchase of Twenty-Five (25) sets of Filter Media (Belts) , Specification No. P-130, for the Winklepresses. Tabulation of bids is as follows: Supplier Ouantit Cost per set Total Gierlich—Mitchell , Inc. 25 $3,344.00 $83,600.00 National Filter Media Corp. 25 3,876.00 96,900.00 It is recommended that the award be made to Gierlictr-Mitchell , Inc., for a total of $83,600.00, plus sales tax. Respectfully submitted, k p1bixuvw 0.110�'1 Katherine Yarosh Senior Buyer We hereby.concur, with the foregoing recommendation: Ted E. Hoffman, Purchasing Manager \16-u T&'0:t Robert J. Ooten, Gary G. treed Assistant Director of Operations Directo of Finance YFC" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eighteen (18) CONTRACTOR? HUNTER CORPORATION DATE February D,10 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (gedust) $ 267,851.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ITEM 1 - CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IN EQUIPMENT This item is for correction of deficiencies in equipment that was not properly manufactured or preserved by the equipment manufacturer and includes the following items of work: A. On-engine starting air pipe: Remove all foreign matter, including rust, mill scale, weld splatter, grease, paint, and weld wires or spacers. Cost include handling of pipe. B. Fuel gas pipe: Remove all foreign matter, including rust, mill scale, weld splatter, grease, paint, and weld wires or spacers. Cost include handling of pipe. C. Jacket water system: Remove all foreign matter, including rust and scale. After cleaning, preserve the system with a commercial package formulated for medium speed engines. D. Intercoolers and aftercoolers: Steam clean the air side of the 1ntercooler and adapters. Sandblast and repaint adapters showing signs of rust. E. Combustion air manifold: Remove all foreign matter, including dust and sand. F.. On engine starting air valves: Remove slight surface rust on internal cast surface and preserve to prevent future rusting prior to start-up. G. Turbocharger compressor cases and blower wheels: Remove debris, white spots, and debris observed in borescope inspections. H. Engine lube oil pumps: Inspect and clean engine lube oil pumps. I. Pressure Regulator Adapter Spools: Clean weld splatter and deficient welds. J. Engine No. 2 lube oil header: Examine and remove aberration !Iscovered during borescope inspections. "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eighteen (18) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE February1 93 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 K. Piston and art pins: Inspect all pins prior to start-up and replace pins exhibiting rust. L. Lube oil heat exchanger control valves: Deburr and clean out debris from three way valves. M. Intake air silencers: Remove sand, insulation fibers, wires and any other foreign matter from three silencers. Cost includes handling of silencers. N. Flushing of lube oil coolers and lube ail filter/strainers. 0. Lube oil coolers: Remove and reinstall lube Oil coolers for cleaning by engine manufacturer. P. Digester gas duplex filter: Remove and reinstall for realignment of flanges improperly installed by filter manufacturer. Q. Engine inspections: Providing support for various engine inspections. R. Contractor supervision, equipment, insurance, and field office expenses. Costs for this work are itemized below: Labor and Materials to restore engines (Items A - M) $ 46,345.00 Labor and Materials for restoration or repair of $ 22,196.00 miscellaneous items (Items N - Q) Contractor supervision expenses (Item R) $ 171,000.00 Districts acknowledge. that the contract will be further delayed by a revised startup procedure and that on the project schedule the startup would have been successfully completed by January 18, 1993. This change order item does not include any revised startup delays and cost. 1✓ "D-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eighteen CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE February 30, 16 38) JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 Items A through M were accomplished by Contractors's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)2 of the General Provisions. Items N through R were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO -025) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 239,541.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 90 Calendar Days ITEM 2 - NATURAL GAS PRESSURE REGULATING VALVE REPLACEMENT This item is for removing the two inch pressure regulating valves originally supplied by the engine manufacturer. (Tag Nos. 16PRV178, 278 and 378) and replacing them with one inch regulating valves. Cost include pipe demolition and refabrication required to make up the new valve diameter. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(1) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,930.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3 - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON GROSS METERING This item is for raceway, cable, relays and installation of the metering cabinet provided by Southern California Edison in the Central Power Generation Building. Computer programming to recognize alarm points at the M-SCADA computer system is also included. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(1) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH J191-062) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 13,353.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 4 - DEDICATED CIRCUIT FOR ELEVATOR LIGHTS This item is for providing for additional raceway and cable for a dedicated light circuit for the elevator lights which is needed to meet requirements of the National Electric Code. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (1) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH J191-O66) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,983.00 `.d✓ TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "D-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 6 : P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eighteen (18) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE February 1jg JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 ITEM 5 - HEATING FOR LUBE OIL PIPE FLUSHING FLUID This item is for cost associated with elevating the temperature of the flushing fluids during lube oil pipe flushing operations to one hundred fifty degrees Fahrenheit. This elevated temperature provides higher turbulence of the flushing fluid which provides more efficient cleaning of the interior of the pipe. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (1) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,044.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days `..� ITEM 6 - REDUCTION OF CHANGE ORDER RETENTION This item is for releasing retention held for change order work performed on the contract. Securities held as substitution of retention will be reduced from $815,000.00 to $770,543.00. This will reduce the retention held on this project to five percent of the original contract amount of $15,410,855.00. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 0.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 267,851.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 90 Calendar Days "D-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eighteen (18) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE February 16 1993 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 90 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 21, 1991 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date October 12, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 90 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 268 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 868 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date July 7, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $-15 410410 855.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 863 141.00 This Change (Add) (Dedueb) $�L Amended Contract Price $ 1 b ,,547.UU "D-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(d - ALL DISTRICTS "D-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 �✓ CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eighteen (18) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE February 10, 1993 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 Board Authorization Date: February 10, 1993 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: ngineering Manager Date Co truction Manager Date APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Qd'4 / 1 /3 r( irector of Engineering Date Genera ounsel Date HUNTER CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: 2A /--13-91 CAs�ontractor v Date "D-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-6" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS =k OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 6127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 y 10844 ELLIS, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)962-2411 January 20, 1993 Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Califomia 92708 Subject: Certification of Negotiated Fee for Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers in Connection with Rehabilitation of Clarifiers 3,4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P7-41, and Rehabilitation of Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48 In accordance with the Districts' procedures for selection of professional engineering services, the Selection Committee has negotiated the following fee with John Carollo Engineers forthe Rehabilitation of Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41, and Rehabilitation of Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No.2,Job No.P2-48,on an hourly-rate basis including labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses, and fixed profit, in an amount not to exceed $59,806.00. Engineering Services, direct labor at hourly rates plus overhead at 155%), not to exceed $51,606.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 2,000.00 Fixed Profit 6,200.00 TOTAL CONTRACT, not to exceed 559.806.00 The Selection Committee hereby certifies the above final negotiated fee as reasonable for the services to be performed and that said fee will not result in excessive profits for the consultant. /s/wlliam Mahoney Is/Evelyn Hart William Mahoney Evelyn Hart Joint Chairman Vice Joint Chairman Selection Committee Selection Committee /s/Thomas M. Dawes Thomas M. Dawes Director of Engineering Selection Committee "E" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "E" RESOLUTION NO. 93-12 APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT `..� WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT FOR JOB NOS. P1-41 AND P2-48 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGN REPORT FOR REHABILITATION OF CLARIFIERS 3, 4 AND 5 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-41, AND REHABILITATION OF CLARIFIERS D THROUGH Q AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-48 WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County have heretofore adopted a policy establishing procedures for the selection of professional services; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said procedures, an agreement has been negotiated with John Carollo Engineers for preliminary design `...� report for Rehabilitation of Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41, and Rehabilitation of Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2 , Job No. P2-48; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to authorization of the Boards of Directors on August 12, 1992, the Selection Committee, established pursuant to said procedures, has negotiated and certified the final negotiated fee for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Professional Services Agreement dated February 10, 1993, by and between County Sanitation "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" District No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, and John Carollo Engineers, for preparation of a preliminary design report for �•✓ Rehabilitation of Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41, and Rehabilitation of Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said services is hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions set forth in said agreement, as follows: Professional Services at hourly rates for labor, plus overhead at 155%, not to exceed $51,606.00 Direct Expenses, not to exceed 2, 000.00 Fixed Profit 6,200.00 TOTAL, not to exceed $59,806.00 Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as contracting agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 10, 1993. "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-17 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT AND COLLECTIBLE WORK AUTHORIZATION WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY RE CONTRACT NO. 11-17-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT AND COLLECTIBLE WORK AUTHORIZATION WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY (SCGC) FOR RELOCATION OF 8-INCH AND 2-INCH GAS MAINS REQUIRED IN CONNECTION WITH CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT NO. 11-17-1 •t,tilt*,ttr**rt****ff,t*t**tx*fr**Rf,t*• The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Collectible Work Authorization and Indemnification Agreement dated for the relocation of 8-inch and 2-inch gas mains required for the Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1, wherein County Sanitation District No. 11, on behalf of itself and county Sanitation District No. 3, agrees to reimburse the costs of relocation and to indemnify and hold the Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) harmless relative to any taxes and related costs for which they might be liable in connection with said work, is hereby approved; and, Section 2 . That payment to SCGC in an amount not to exceed $64,000.00 for said relocation, is hereby authorized and approved; and, "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - DISTRICTS 3811 "G-1" Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Indemnification Agreement and Collectible Work Authorization on behalf of Districts Nos. 3 and 11 in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 10, 1993. "G-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) - DISTRICTS 3&11 "G-2" COUim SANrBMC d DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 6 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 FIT•TF AVENUE ECUPD'AIN VALLEY, CALIFCRNIA 92708 CHANCE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (11 CONTRA=: Peter C. David Co., Inc. DATE Fehruary 10. 1993 JOB: Lamson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2 Amount of this Change Omer (Add) (Da&ict) $ 149,630.71 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES Upon completing exploratory excavations of all utilities from Station 0+92.75 to Station 1+30 along Ianpson Avenue, the Contractor encountered two 4-inch telephone ducts not shown on the contract drawings. Discovery of these telephone conduits prevented the Contractor from utilizing the tenporary type shields to shore the jacking pit to protect the crew nE mbers. Instead he was required to use the more costly, penTwnent type solid sheeting. Contractor provided a credit for the teuporary type shields not utilized. The Contractor was directed to install the solid sheeting on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 83,311.30 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM 15 Calendar Days Item 2 - UNDISCLOSED CONCRETE AND TIMERS while atteapting to complete the jacking of a 60-inch dianeter steel casing at the intersection of Knott Avenue and I.ampson Avenue for a new 24-inch sewer, undisclosed obstructions of concrete and timbers were encountered. The contractor was directed to excavate the end of the casing to remove the obstruction. The costs for this extra work includes labor, materials and equipmnt. This item was performed on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2)(B). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 28,807.78 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER TTE24: 4 Calendar Days "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) (1) - DISTRICT 3 "H-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 6 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FCONn IN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACOR: Peter C. David Co.. Inc. DATE Febmary 10, 1993 JOB: rammson Interceptor Sewer. Contract No 3-24-2 Item 3 - UNDISCLOSED WATER IJNE The Contractor encountered a 10-inch water line not shown on the contract drawings while excavating and placing the new 24-inch sewer line. The undisclosed line was in Iampson Avenue between Industry street and Monarch Street. The line was inadvertently broken causing flooding of the trench. The Contractor was directed to pump out the trench and repair the water line. The costs for this extra work include labor and equipment. This work was performed an a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2) (B). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 10,104.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days Item 4 - UNDISCOVERED UTILITIES IES The Contractor attempted to locate a 2-inch gas line shown on the contract drawings, but never found. The Contractor and equipment were delayed for a period of time until it was determined that the lines dial not exist. The work was performed on a force amount basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b(2)(B). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 876.04 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: - 1 Calendar Days Item 5 - REALIGNMENT OF SEWER The Contractor was directed to remove five sections of the 24-inch new sewer Line due to misalignment of existing connection on manhole that did not correspond with plans. The new sections of the pipe had to be cut to the correct realignment of the pipe. The slurry was excavated and hauled away. The costs for this extra work includes labor, materials and equipment and it was performed on a force amount basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6B2.b ,ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 20,514.00 TIME EXTENSI0N THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 2 Calendar Days "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( I ) (1) - DISTRICT 3 "H-2" COMM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OPR4GE COUNLR Page 3 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844. ECISS AVENUE FDDWL N VALLEY, CALn13MIDT 92708 CH)VM ORDER C. O. NO. One !1) CONrPACTCIl2: Peter C. David Co.. Inc. DATE Fehivary 10. 1993 JOB:-Lau--an Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2 Item 6 - UNDISCLOSED UTILITIES Between Stations 0+34.75 and 19+19, the Contractor encountered various utilties which were not shown on the plans. These included a 2-inch water line, 3-inch and 4-inch PVC lines, a 10-inch water line, three Chevron oil pipes, a number of telephone ducts at three different locations and a 12-inch uimarked steel pipe. The Contractor was directed to bypass these obstructions which resulted in additional. excavation. This item was performed on a force amount basis in amordance with General Provisions, Section 10-6B2.b. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 27,295.32 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 5 Calendar Days Item 7 - UNDISCLOSED P067ER POLE AND TELEPHONE I AND OTHER OBSTACLES At Station 29+93 and Station 31+40 the Contractor encountered six additional underground 4-inch telephone lines. The sewer line had to be dug under these lines. On Laupson Avenue f= Knott to Western Avenues, the Contractor was directed to repaint the median lines that were badly faded. At Station 30+62 the Contractor encountered a paves pole which was not shown on the plans. The Contractor Toyed Southern California Edison Company to recmve the pole. There was a one-foot discrepancy between the cut sheets and the survey narks at Station 38+30. As a result, the Contractor was directed to pull the shield out and excavate the trench along the correct alignment. These items were performed on a force amount basis in accordance with General Provisions, Section 10-6B2.b. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,943.90 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 8 Calendar Days Item 8 - SLURRYING, CONCRETE AND TIMBER HINDERANCE, ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC IAOP PLACEMENT The Contractor was directed to place slurry over a two-inch line to protect the line fron overburden pressure. This line was not shown on the plans. At Station 39+90 the Contractor damaged a six-inch sewer line which was not shown on the plans. The City of Garden Grove directed the Contractor to replace an additional 13 traffic loops not shown on contract drawings between Monarch and Western Avenues. At Station 0+39 the Contractor encountered concrete and timber, which needed to be renove9. This item was perfomed on a force amount basis in accordance with General Provisions, Section 10-6B2.b. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,041.86 TIME EXTENSIC THIS CHANGE ORDER rIEM: 1 Calendar Day "H-3" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) ( 1) - DISTRICT 3 "H-3" OOMITY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COLUM Page 4 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 FrT,TS AVENUE FOLII= VAISBY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANCE ORDER C. 0. NO. One (1) COd1RACTOR: Peter C. David Co. . Inc. DATE Febnm 10, 1993 JOB: Lamoson Interceptor Sewer Contract No 3-24-2 Item 9 - REPAIR AND PAVE DAPP)® STREET The City of Carden Grove repaired and paved the damaged sections of Lamgson Avenue due to Contractor's work and billed the Districts which is deducted from the Contractor. This item was performed on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(B)(2) (b). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ ( 5,263.49) TIME FXTEISION THIS CHANCE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 10 - LIQUIDATED D� `�.►' Section 50-8, Time of Completion and Liquidated Damages provides for the time of final completion shall. be 120 days after the date contract, including 5 calendar days of inclement weather. Pursuant to Government Code Section 53069.85, the parties to the Construction Agreement agree that if a final completion of all work is not reached within the time specified, plus allaganoe node for delays and extensions under the terns of the contract, the Contractor will pay Districts the su�n of $200.00 per day as liquidated damages. Notice to Proceed - September 10, 1991 120 Calendar Days - January 6, 1992, Work to be Completed 325 Actual Days Worked - July 30, 1992, Actual Completion Date 39 Calendar Days Allowed Due to Change Order 11 Calendar Days Allowed Due to Inclement Weather 325 Days Worked 170 Days Allowed 155 Days Liquidated Damages X $200.00 per Day = $( 31,000.00) CREDIT THIS CHANCE CRDER ITEM: $( 31,000.00) TIM E ENSION THIS CHANCE ORDER rm: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 149,630.71 TOTAL TIM P.SC1EFl4ION THIS CHANGE CEDER: 50 Calendar Days "H-4" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) ( 1 ) - DISTRICT 3 "H-4" CONY Sn*T=N DISTRICTS OF OPANO COUNTY Page 6 of 6 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RrT.TR AVENUE �i FUfMMIN VAIIEY, CAIJFORNIA 92708 Cm*m OHM C. O. NO. One (11 CON1NA=: Peter C. David Co.. Inc. DATE FYbcuary 10. 1993 JOB: Ian Interceptor Sauer. Contract No. 3-24-2 Board Authorization Date: February 10, 1993 COMM SANITATION DISTRICTS OF amm COUNTY, cuam UIIA RAIDED BY: p ,, ENDED BY: ,, sp- h---e' /- - 9J /1"6 E- , ineering Manager Date Construction Manager Date AF7 (I/ APPPOVED AS TO FOfAf: / Dife&rw of Engineering Date GoWbal Counsel Date PElffit C. DAM CO., INC. tfl ��' 9-3 to "H-6" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) ( 1) - DISTRICT 3 "H-6" OOU2rY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 WLIS AVENUE FI UBMIN VALLEY, C19,IF RTTA 92708 CBNb= ORDER �•r' C. 0. NO. One (1) CONTRACTOR. Peter C. David Co.. Inc. DATE Febrcary 10, 1993 JOB: Lamson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time node by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 50 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or cansequent:al costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly gated and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME �J Original Contract Date September 10, 1991 Original Contract Time 120 Calendar Days Original Completion Date January 7, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 50 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 50 Calendar Days Revised Contract Tice 170 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date M mary 26, 1992 Actual Final Completion Date July 30, 1992 Tice Subject to Liquidated Damages 155 Calendar Days Original Contract Price $_ 881,000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 0.00 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 149,630.71 Amended contract Price $ 1,030,630.71 "H-5" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) (1 ) - DISTRICT 3 "H-5" COUTM SANITATLCN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 IRT.TC AVHNU6 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALTFCROIIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRAI.'TOR: Peter C. David Co. . Inc. DATE Fehtvary 10. 1993 JOB: Lamosan Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2 Pnoumt of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 5.912.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following change in the contract w&cr contract work are hereby authorized and as coup y ensatzon therefor, he follaving additions to or r4+rh ticns from the contract price are hereby aWraved. ADJUSIM.ENr OF ENS 'S QUANTITIES ADD: Change in Item Quantity Unit No. Unit Desoriotion Frtm To Difference Price TOPAZ 2 LF 24-inch VCP 2925.00 2930.00 5.00 $ 161.00 = $ 805.00 3 LF 21-inch VCP 983.00 988.00 5.00 151.00 = 755.00 4 LF 48-inch Casing 100.00 140.00 40.00 455.00 = 18,200.00 8 VF 84-inch Manholes 15.00 15.80 0.80 630.00 = 504.00 SUBTOTAL = $ 20,264.00 DEDUCT: Chang in Item Oantity Unit No. Unit Description From To Difference Price TOTAL 6 VF 60-inch Manholes 146.00 112.80 33.20 $ 400.00 -($13,280.00) 7 VF 72-inch Manholes 18.00 16.70 1.30 440.00 =($ 572.00) 9 VF 10-inch VCP 40.00 38.00 2.00 250.00 =( 500.00) SUBTOTAL. =($14,352.00) TOTAL CUSP TBIS CBAIM CFXER: $ 5,912.00 �..� TOTAL TIME MEMISION THIS CBAiM QID U 0 Calendar Days "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( I)(2) - DISTRICT 3 "1-11, COUMT SANr=CN DI9=CM OF CFMM CCUNW Page 2 of 3 P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 RTT•TS AVENUE FOUNIAIN VA=, CA1JFa0aA 92708 CBANM OFUM C. O. NO. Two (2) Can RAC10R: Peter C. David Co.. Inc. GATE February 10, 1993 JOB: Lamoson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2 The additional wrk contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prim work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or dsmeges have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUN[PM OF CONTRACT TDE Original Contract Date September 10, 1991 Original Contract Time 120 Calendar Days Original Ccupletion Date January 7, 1992 Tice Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Tim Hctension 50 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 170 Calendar Days Revised Final Ccvpletion Due Date February 26, 1992 Actual Final. Ccupleti.on Date July 30, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages 155 Calendar Days Original Contract Price $ 881,000.00 Prev. kith. Changes $ 149,630.71 This Change (Add) (DaGh ) $ 5,912.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1.036.542.71 "1-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "I-2" CODN'1'Y SANLTATSON DISIRICPB OF CRAM COMY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 108" BLLIS AROM POMMIi VALT , CALZ MUM 92708 CERM ORDER C. 0. NO. TW (2) CCNIRAM Rt: Peter C. David OD., Ina. DA7E_FeboMM 10. 1933 OCB: Lmmscn� Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2 _ Board Authorization Date: February 10, 1993 000 M SA4D.TMM M D7S'HMM OF am= C010I1'4, ( umumm RECC ® BY: 797- BY: m7 — -9 _ Eng+ mw ng Manager Data Mnstruction Manager Date : APPR�O--W AAAS,TO PERM: Director of Engineering Date General Counsel Date PBM C. DAVID Co., 1BC. HY• a "I-3" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) (2) - DISTRICT 3 "1-3" RESOLUTION NO. 93-18-3 .ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-24-2 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION. DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-24-2, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT tt+tttttttttttttt+t+ttttttttt++++t The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Peter C. David, Inc. , has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for Lampson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2, on July 30, 1992; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Lampson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated September 10, 1991; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Peter C. David, Inc. , setting forth the terms and conditions for "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) (3) - DISTRICT 3 "J-1" acceptance of Lampson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 3, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 10, 1993. "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( i ) (3) - DISTRICT 3 "J-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-19-7 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH ATCHISON. TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (AT&SF) RE CONTRACT NO. 7-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (AT&SF) TO INSTALL FACILITIES WITHIN AT&SF'S RIGHT-OF-WAY IN CONNECTION WITH ABANDONMENT OF NAVY WAY PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAIN, AND CONSTRUCTION OF REPLACEMENT GRAVITY SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-20 WHEREAS, on February 13 , 1974, the Board of Directors approved Pipeline Licenses with the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (AT&SF) required in the construction of Contract No. 7-2A, 3-C and 3-D subtrunks; and, WHEREAS, in connection with the Abandonment of Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20, it is necessary to enter into a Supplemental Agreement with AT&SF to allow installation and maintenance of a new sewer manhole on the existing sewer on AT&SF property. NOW, THEREFORE, The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, Calfornia, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Supplemental Agreement dated February 10, 1993, wherein the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (AT&SF) grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 the right to install and maintain a new manhole within AT&SF's right-of-way in connection with Abandonment of Navy Way "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(1 ) - DISTRICT 7 "K-1" Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20, is hereby approved and . . accepted; and, Section 2. That payment to AT&SF in the amount of $150.00 for use of said right-of-way, is hereby authorized; and, Section 3 . That the General Manager is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Supplemental Agreement on behalf of the District in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 10, 2993. "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - DISTRICT 7 "K-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-13 REVISING DISTRICTS PROCEDURE FOR SETTLEMENT OF l CLAIMS MADE AGAINST THE DISTRICTS: SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS MADE BY THE DISTRICTS: COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS OWING TO THE DISTRICTS: AND SETTLEMENT OF CIVIC OR ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 , 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING DISTRICT PROCEDURES FOR SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS MADE AGAINST THE DISTRICTS; SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS MADE BY THE DISTRICTS; COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT ACCOUNTS OWING TO THE DISTRICTS; SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL OR ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS; AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 88-61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ WHEREAS, claims for damages alleging personal injuries, including death, and to real and personal property, are periodically made against the Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Districts presently have no liability insurance �d in force, having previously determined to be self-insured; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have the need for the retention of claims administration services and legal counsel who shall be vested within certain limited authority to accomplish a favorable disposition of claims made against the Districts; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have occasion to seek recovery against persons or entities who have caused loss or damage to the Districts, who have been assessed fines, charges or special fees relating to their use of District facilities, or who have been the subject of civil or administrative enforcement proceedings for violation of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance; and, \ / "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #11 (b) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-1" WHEREAS, in the course of conducting the business affairs of the Districts, certain accounts receivable or other obligations owing to the Districts become delinquent, and in fact, uncollectible; and, WHEREAS, cost efficiency relating to collection of delinquent accounts can be greatly improved by the adoption of certain policies relating to the collection of said accounts. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE, RESOLVE AND ORDER: ARTICLE I SETTLEMENT OF LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE AGAINST DISTRICTS Section 1. 1: A liability reserve has been established in \� the amount of $500,000.00 for the payment of claims made against the Districts. Said amount shall continue to be provided for in each annual budget to ensure that sufficient funds are on deposit to provide for payment of those amounts incurred as a liability loss or expense. Section 1.2: Each annual budget shall provide, in addition to the reserve established by Section 1.1, for the sufficient funds to provide a sufficient balance to meet projected expenses for loss and payment of claims during the ensuing fiscal year. Section 1.3: A claims administration firm is authorized to be retained, and said firm is hereby granted authorization to make payments and settlements of claims made against the Districts in an amount not to exceed $1, 000.00 per claimant. "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-2" Said firm shall be retained in accordance with the terms and ' conditions set forth in an agreement approved by the General Counsel. Section 1.4: A committee comprised of the General Manager or his designee, the Director of Finance and the General Counsel are authorized to review and make full settlement of any claims made against the Districts for contract or liability damages not otherwise covered by insurance by payment of a sum not to exceed $25,000.00 per claimant. In the event a claim results in litigation, which is being legally defended by other than the Districts' General Counsel, this committee shall review and provide the approval to the Districts' special legal counsel within the same limits. Section 1.5: All claims for damages resulting in a judgment or a recommended settlement by negotiation in an amount exceeding 1 / $25,000.00 per claimant, shall be submitted to and approved by the Board of Directors of the defendant District or the Joint Boards in the event of claims made against the Joint Districts. Section 1.6: The General Counsel is authorized to retain the services of special legal counsel for purposes of representing the Districts in the defense of any claim or matter of litigation, wherein he determines that specialized expertise or experience is desirable, a conflict of interest exists or could arise with the office of General Counsel or that the workload of the office of General Counsel requires the utilization of special counsel. I , "L-3" AGENDA ITEM #11 (b) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-3" ARTICLE II COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT OBLIGATIONS OWING TO THE DISTRICTS Section 2.1: The Director of Finance is authorized to write off as an uncollectible debt any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts in excess of 90 days and not exceeding the sum of $250.00. Section 2.2: The Director of Finance, in his discretion, is authorized to assign for collection to a person or firm of his choosing, any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts in excess of 45 days and not exceeding the sum of $2,500.00. Ninety (90) days after assigning the obligation for collection, the Director of Finance is authorized to write off as an uncollectible debt, any portion of the obligation which is still outstanding. Section 2.3: The Director of Finance, in his discretion, is authorized to file the necessary proceedings in the Small Claims Court of the appropriate judicial district of the County of Orange in order to collect any delinquent obligation owing to the Districts in excess of 45 days and not exceeding the sum of $2,500.00 or, with the concurrence of General Counsel, not exceeding the sum of $5,000.00. Upon obtaining a judgment in favor of the Districts, the Director of Finance and General Counsel shall take all legal measures necessary to enforce the terms of the judgment. Ninety (90) days after receiving a final judgment in favor of the Districts, the Director of Finance is authorized to write off as an uncollectible debt, any portion of the obligation which is still outstanding. "L-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-4" Section 2.4 : Notwithstanding the authority provided in Sections 2.2 and 2.3 above, any obligation owing to the Districts, not exceeding the sum of $25, 000.00, may be fir' compromised by acceptance of a sum lesser than the full amount due or may be written off as uncollectible, upon that determination being made, after investigation by a committee comprised of the General Manager, or his designee, General Counsel and Director of Finance. Section 2 .5: The Director of Finance shall forward any delinquent obligation in excess of $25,000.00 to the General Counsel for the Districts, who shall submit his recommendation to the Boards of Directors as to the method of collection or disposition of said account. Section 2.6: In addition to the above authorization, the Director of Finance is directed to exercise all available lawful methods to ensure prompt and full recovery of all obligations owing to the Districts. Section 2.7: The Director of Finance is authorized to offset against any sums held on deposit by the Districts on behalf of any person who owes a delinquent obligation to the Districts. Section 2.8: The Director of Finance is authorized to withhold the approval of any such permits otherwise to be issued by the Districts to any person who has an outstanding debt obligation owing to the Districts until such time as said debt obligation is paid in full. Section 2.9: Delinquent obligations, as used in this 1 / `vd "L-5" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-5" Resolution, shall include any invoice submitted by the Districts \� for services rendered or for reimbursement of damages caused to District property or personnel, which has not been paid within (a) the time prescribed by the District ordinance or resolution; or (b) thirty (30) days, whichever is later, from the date of invoice. ARTICLE III COLLECTION OF FEES AND CHARGES RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGES Section 3 . 1: In the event of any fees or charges being owed by an Industrial Waste Permittee up to the amount of $25, 000. 00, a committee comprised of the Director of Finance, Director of Technical Services and General Counsel are authorized to negotiate and enter into, on behalf of the Districts, a settlement agreement relating to the financial obligation owing to the Districts. Said agreement shall be based upon a showing of good cause and a reasonable dispute between the Districts and the Permittee, and can provide for acceptance of a sum lesser than the full amount claimed as due by the District. This agreement may be entered into prior to or during the pending of any litigation action filed by the Districts to collect the amount owed. Section 3 .2 : Upon written request and establishment of good cause by an industrial waste permittee, the committee of the Director of Finance, Director of Technical Services and General Counsel may negotiate and enter into a deferred payment agreement with the permittee in accordance with the guidelines established `J herein. Said agreement may be incorporated as part of or "L-6" AGENDA ITEM #11 (b) ( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-6" separate and in addition to any enforcement compliance agreements authorized by the provisions of the Districts' Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance. Section 3 . 2. 1: The installment payment agreement shall be for a maximum term not to exceed six (6) months. The agreement shall provide for payment of interest on the principal amount owing at a rate equal to prime rate plus 2-1/2%. The prime rate shall be established as the rate set and in effect by Bank of America, San Francisco, California, on the date of the agreement. The agreement shall provide for payment of all costs of preparing and administering the payment agreement, including legal and administrative costs. Section 3 .2.2 : The agreement shall stipulate the penalties to which the permittee shall be subjected in the event of nonpayment of any of the payments specified in the agreement, including initiation of legal action or permit revocation, as recommended by the General Counsel. Section 3 .3 : If the delinquent obligation is greater than $25, 000.00, any compromise settlement or any deferred payment agreement shall be submitted to and approved by the Boards of Directors, who shall prescribe the terms and conditions. "L-7" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-7" ARTICLE IV SETTLEMENT OF CIVIL ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS Section 4. 1: In the event that the Districts initiate or intend to initiate any civil or administrative enforcement actions based upon alleged violations of the Districts, Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance, a committee comprised of the Director of Technical Services, the Source Control Manager and the General Counsel are authorized to negotiate and enter into, on behalf of the Districts, a settlement agreement, which may include both payment to District in an amount up to $25, 000.00 and enforcement compliance orders deemed appropriate to ensure compliance with the Wastewater Discharge Regulations Ordinance. This agreement may be entered into prior to or during the pending of any administrative proceeding or litigation enforcement action. Section 4 . 2: The committee of the Director of Technical Services, Source Control Manager and General Counsel may negotiate and enter into a settlement agreement which includes a - schedule of payments over time by the person or entity which is the subject of the enforcement action. Section 4 . 3 : If the proposed settlement involves payment greater than $25,000. 00, the settlement shall be submitted for approval by the Board of Directors of the involved District or the Joint Boards in the event of an enforcement action involving the Joint Districts. Section 4.4: That Resolution No. 88-61 is hereby repealed "L-8" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-8" and made of no further effect. Section 4.5: This Resolution is effective immediately upon t / adoption. �e•' PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 10, 1993. "L-9" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (1) - ALL DISTRICTS "L-9" RESOLUTION NO. 93-14 `J POLICY PERTAINING TO FUTURE AREAS TO BE SERVED BY THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A POLICY PERTAINING TO FUTURE AREAS TO BE SERVED BY THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 85-207 . � . x r w w r � . r • s WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County,Califomia, ("Districts") provide wastewater collection, treatment and disposal services to serve all or part of 23 Cities and unincorporated areas occupying the central and northwestern areas of Orange County, and for certain areas outside of the Districts boundaries pursuant to service agreements, as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and, WHEREAS, concern has been expressed to the Districts that if the Districts' service areas were to be further expanded by annexation or service agreement, it may impair the ability of the Districts to provide adequate service to areas presently within their jurisdiction; and, WHEREAS, concern has been expressed to the Districts by the City of Fountain Valley over the potential impacts on areas in the vicinity of the treatment plant facilities, if said facilities would need to be expanded to accommodate growth due to annexations of territory or providing service by agreement for areas outside of the present jurisdiction or approved spheres of influence of the Districts or those areas serviced by agreement; and, WHEREAS, in response to such concerns the Boards of Directors approved "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-1" Resolution No. 85-207, adopting a policy pertaining to future areas to be served by the Districts, limiting sewerage service to the then existing service areas; and, WHEREAS, on-site sewerage disposal systems in adjacent communities may contribute to degradation of groundwater basins used by cities and communities within the Districts' service area; and, WHEREAS, the Districts' Boards of Directors believe that it is in the best interests of the communities and cities served by the Districts to assist in preserving Orange County's valuable groundwater supplies from degradation by on-site sewage disposal systems; and, WHEREAS, the Districts' Boards of Directors have been advised that on-site sewage disposal systems within the municipal boundaries of the City of La Habra Heights, which are tributary to the Districts' sewerage system but not within the Districts' service area, may be contaminating the groundwater supply in Orange County; and, WHEREAS, the Districts have studied the impact of allowing said area to discharge into the Districts' sewerage system; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have been advised that the 1989 Master Plans for each District and the 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan that call for the planning and construction of treatment works, disposal facilities, trunk line sewers and related appurtenances are compatible with and can accommodate the wastewater service needs of all those areas presently within the Districts' approved spheres of influence and also within the areas located outside the existing boundaries of the Districts, but which are receiving service pursuant to service agreements; and, WHEREAS, the Boards of Directors have also determined that the master-planned facilities for each District and the Joint Works can also accommodate the wastewater flows "M-2" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-2" from said area within the municipal boundaries of the City of La Habra Heights without causing any adverse impact on the areas in the vicinity of the treatment plants or in the operations of the treatment plants and facilities themselves. NOW, THEREFORE, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That the Districts adopt, as their policy, that they will not approve additional annexations of territory nor approve any service agreement, except for territory presently included in the individual Districts' adopted spheres of influence or which is entitled to receive service pursuant to existing service agreements as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A", except as provided hereafter in Section 2. Section 2: The Districts will provide service to territory within the municipal boundaries of the City of La Habra Heights, as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "B", and allow connection to Districts' sewerage system to reduce degradation of valuable groundwater in Orange County, provided the following conditions are satisfied: A. A local government agency executes the service agreement providing for sewerage services and for payment of one-time fees equivalent to annexation fees, connection fees, and an administrative charge, and annual fees equivalent to sewer service fees, property taxes and an administrative charge, and any other terms and conditions, all as established by the Board of Directors at the time of approval, or as amended from time-to-time, for said service; and, B. The local land use, sewer or water authority agree to require "M-3" AGENDA ITEM #11(b) (2) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-3" connections to the Districts or other sewage treatment systems and discourage on-site disposal systems. �l Section 3: That Resolution No. 85-207, adopted on December 11, 1995, is hereby repealed and made of no further effect. PASSED AND ADOPM at a regular meeting held February 10, 1993. rau31 "M-4" AGENDA ITEM #11(b)(2) - ALL DISTRICTS "M-4" C _ CC S UC- C N C)MPAINY 18 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE.SURE 118.IRVINE.CADFORNN M18.PHONE(714))I)-M2 FAX(714)7II-8 l January 20, 1993 Mr. Roger Carrillo ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 RE: Operations Center Expansion Via Fax & District Bid No. P2-23-5-1 Certified Mail Protest to Bids Received on January 19, 1993 Dear Mr. Carrillo: Culp Construction submitted a bid yesterday to the District on the above referenced project. - After receiving your correspondence today, our office has noted that the bids submitted by Javaid Contractors, RJW Construction Company, and PH Hagopian Contractors are non-responsive to the District's solicitation request and bid requirements. Culp Construction Company considers these bids as non-responsive due to the fact that all three contractor's bids failed to list subcontractor's license numbers in the space provided for in the bid documents. It is clearly stated in the General Provisions, Standard Specifications, and Standard Drawings, 1991 Edition, Section 2-3, Paragraph One, on Page 2-2 that "Bids shall be made only upon the Proposal form furnished by the District and shall be considered a part of the Contract Documents. All bids shall be properly executed with all items on the Proposal form shall be filled in" . The District reiterated it's position on this matter in issuing Addendum No. 5 on January 12, 1993. Page one of this addendum, Item No. 1 again states that "All Bids shall be properly executed with all items on the Proposal form filled in". Culp Construction hereby requests that the District reject and disqualify the bids submitted by Javaid Contractors, RJW Construction Company, and PH Hagopian Contractors and in turn award this contract to Culp Construction Company who has complied with all bid document requirements. "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #13(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1" Page Two Letter to Mr. Roger Carrillo January 20, 1993 I look forward to your favorable and immediate response on this important matter. Sincerely, .ONS Ltr y COMPANY Y Mark E. Albertson Vice President MEA/cc cc: Michael A. Lanphere, Esq. Charles H. Culp Project File 1 I "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2" RESOLUTION NO. 93-15 AWARDING JOB NO. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR OPERATIONS CENTER EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23-5-1 (REBID NO. 2) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which is a portion of the previously-approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989; and, Section 2 . That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Javaid Contractors, Inc. for Operations center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) , and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, "P-1" AGENDA ITEM #13( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS 11P-1" Section 3. That the irregularity in the bid of Javaid Contractors, Inc. , wherein the license numbers of subcontractors named in the proposal were omitted be, and is hereby, waived; and that the contract for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) , be awarded to Javaid Contractors, Inc. , in the total corrected amount of $2,284,864.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the chairman and secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, . �J Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 10, 1993 . "P-2" AGENDA ITEM #13( i ) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS January 19, 1993 d ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 11:00 a.m. Five Addenda ver4 EWS AVENUE vO BOX G127 BID TABULATION FOUNTAIN VAULEY,CAUF0AMA 82728-8' 91.19824411 1 I Job No. P2-23.5-11Rebid No. 21 PROJECT TITLE: Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Addition of new locker rooms. offices. and remodeling of existing rooms at Plant No. 2 Operations Center ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $2.800.000 BUDGET AMOUNT: $2.925,000 TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID 1. Javaid Contractors, Inc., Rowland Heights, CA $2,284,864.00• 2. RJW Construction Co., Inc., Yorba Linda, CA $2,338,536.00 3. P. H. Hagopian Contractor, Inc., Orange, CA $2,356,328.00 4. Culp Construction Company, Irvine, CA $2,361,159.00 5. Chartered Construction Corp., Los Angeles, CA $2,422,000.00 u 6. Roman-Ford IJV7, Los Angeles, CA $2,428,000.00 7. Lewis Jorge Construction Management, Inc. Baldwin Park, CA $2,432,966.00 8. The Gorham Co., Inc., Corona, CA $2,455,605.00 9. FTR International Inc., Irvine, CA $2,500,000.00 10. K. C. Perry, Inc., Santa Fe Springs, CA $2,561,759.00 11. Hayward Construction, Monrovia, CA $2,661,998.000 12. Pinner Construction Co., Inc., Anaheim, CA $2,670,147.00 •comsat XI total. I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Javaid Contractors, Inc. in the bid amount of $2,284,864.00 as the lowest and best bid. M. Dawes Director of Engineering "P-3" AGENDA ITEM #130 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "P-3" CORPORATION CALIFDRNIA OFFICE - 23181 VEROLIGO DRIVE. LAGUNA HILLS CA 92853 Telephone 714 955-99 5 2 Teleccpi 714-955-9314 January 20, 1993 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. I of Orange County,State of California Post Office Box 8127 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley,California 92708 Reference: Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System Job No. J-28 (Rebid) Subject: Bid Challenge Dear Board of Directors: CANUS Corporation participated in the above referenced bid solicitation process. Our proposal is made with a good faith effort to meet, without exception, the requirements of the bid plans and specifications at a minimum cost to the District. CANUS Corporation has requested and been presented with best and final offers from proposed suppliers and vendors. Our suppliers and vendors assure us that we have quotes equal to or below any offered to others (i.e. our competition). Our engineering, construction labor, overhead, and profit have historically been among the most competitive in the industry. CANUS Corporation sincerely questions the ability of any bidder to meet the requirements of the plans and specifications (including hardware/software, engineering, integration, installation, etc.) at a price thirty percent (30%) below the average bid of the next three bidders. CANUS Corporation, therefore, respectfully submits this formal protest to the pending award to Soffit Electric Company and request a formal review of their proposed system as compared to the plans and specifications. Sincerely, y� Ben E.Kirk General Manager BEK:pl pe AGENDA ITEM #14(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "�" RESOLUTION NO. 93-16 AWARDING JOB NO. J-28 (Rebid) A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3 , 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PUMP STATION TELEMETRY AND MONITORING SYSTEM, JOB NO. J-28 (REBID) The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposed construction contract is for a project which is a portion of the previously-approved 1989 Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan. The project is to be constructed as per the Master Plan approval. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and section 15090 of the Districts' Guidelines, the Program Environmental Impact Report on the Collection, Treatment and Disposal Facilities Master Plan covering this project was approved by the Boards of Directors on July 19, 1989; and, Section 2. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Director of Engineering that award of contract be made to Soffa Electric, Inc. for Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28 (Rebid) , and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the contract for Pump Station Telemetry and "S-1" AGENDA ITEM #14( i ) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-1" Monitoring System, Job No. J-28 (Rebid) , be awarded to Soffa Electric, Inc. , in the total amount of $312, 000. 00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and as agent for Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 , are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work, pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 5. That all other bids for said work are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held February 10, 1993 . "S-2" AGENDA ITEM #14( i ) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS January 12, 1993 M ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 11:00 a.m. 1 Addendum 10 "S AVENUE P.o.BOX 0127 FOUM IN VUUY.MLIFORW 02728a127 B I D T A B U L A T I O N OP12822411 Job No. J-28 (Rebid) PROJECT TITLE: Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System Upgrade PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Replacement of existing tone telemetry with a computerized SCADA system. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $400,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT: $400.000.00 ae�==eeeeeeeeeeee�e�e=======e=aeeeee=eeeee===eeveve�=��eseveee====�veevoa TOTAL CONTRACTOR BID 1. Soffa Electric Inc., Commerce, CA $312,000.00 2. Canus Corporation, Laguna Hills, CA E382,119.27* 3. Pouk and Steinle, Inc., Corona, CA $409,783.00 4. Domar Electric, Lake Elsinore, CA $423,500.00 S. Progressive Controls, Brea, CA $490,000.00 6. HSQ Technology, South San Francisco, CA $581,500.00 7. Team Construction Corporation, Garden Grove, CA $604-,933.00* *Corrected totals. I have reviewed the proposals submitted for the above project and find that the low bid is a responsible bid. I, therefore, recommend award to Soffa Electric in the bid amount of $312,000.00 as the lowestand best bid. ahomas . Dawes Director of Engineering "S-3" AGENDA ITEM #14( 1 ) - ALL DISTRICTS "S-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 29 35 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON JANUARY 13, 1993 PHITATION io9olil.. O,dOIST'A J sod (+ Ci S'oca 1954 OggNGE COO ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on January 13, 1993, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 34 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Robert Richardson, Chairman Thomas E. Lutz x Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tam —_Gene Beyer x James M. Ferryman Nate Reade x Thomas R. Saltarelli —Leslie A. Pontlous x Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 2: x Henry W. Medea, Chairman _John M. Gullixson x Jahn Collins, Chairman pro tam George Scott x Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer -7--Bob Bell _Barry Danes 7--Buck Catlin _Molly McClanahan -7--William D. Mahoney James H. Flora =Maria Moreno —_Norman Z. Eckenrode a Carrey J. Nelson Glenn Parker 7--Iry Pickier —Tam Daly _Miguel Pulido _x E. Lutz x Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth _George L. Zlaket =Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Sapien, Chairman _Don Martinez x Burnie Dunlap, Chai man pro tam Carrey J. Nelson x Buck Catlin _Molly McClanahan x John Collins George Scott =James V. Evans —Margie L. Rice =James H. Flora _William D. Mahoney -7--Don R. Griffin Arthur Brown 7--Gall Kerry —Cecilia L. Age =Frank Laszlo —_Gwen A. Forsythe =Thomas E. Lutz Robert Richardson -7--Eva G. Miner _Wally Linn 7--Iry Pickler _Tom Daly =Jim Silva Earle Robitaille x5heldon Singer —George L. Zlaket =Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth x Charles Sylvia _Ronald Bates DISTRICT NO. 5: x John C. Cox, Jr., Chairman Jean Watt -7--Don R. Roth, Chai man pro tem =Roger Stanton x Clarence Turner _Jean Watt DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A. Wahner, Chairman Arthur Perry -7--Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro in —Jan Debay 7--Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Thomas R. Saltarelli x James A. Wahner, Chairman pro tan — - x Fred Barrera Gene Beyer =Barry Hammond - —Mike Ward 7--Ted Moreno _Miguel Pulido -7--Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton 7--Phil Sansone _Jan Oebay DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Earle Robitaille Victor Leipzig. Chairman pro tam xJim Silva z Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M. Gullixson, Chairman _Henry W. Wedaa -7—Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tam Gene Beyer Glenn Parker x Burnie Dunlap x Iry Pickier Tom Daly =Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman _Darryl Miller -7--Leslie A. Pontious, Chairman pro tam Charles E. Puckett x Fred Barrera —_Gene Beyer x Barry Hammond Mike Ward -7--Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton -2- 01/13/93 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Mark Esquer, Gary Hasenstab, Mike Heinz, Ed Hodges, Mike McCarthy, l / Margie Mellor, Bob Ooten, Carol w►' Palmer, Nary Simpson, Jack Vincent, Ray Young OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Jamel Demir, Dan Griset, Bill Knopf, Ruthelyn PI mover, John Shaw .r ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excer s re Boar pan n a That the minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors, appointment of alternate Directors and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: (*Mayor) City/Agency District Active Director Alternate Director Anaheim 2, 3 & 13 Iry Pickier Tom Daly* Brea 2 Carrey J. Nelson Glenn G. Parker 3 Burnie Dunlap* Carrey J. Nelson 13 Glenn G. Parker Burnie Dunlap* Buena Park 3 Don R. Griffin Arthur C. Brown- Cypress 3 Gail Kerry* Cecilia L. Age Fountain Valley 2 & 3 John Collins George Scott Fullerton 2 & 3 A.B. -Buck- Catlin Molly McClanahan* Huntington Beach 3 Jim Silva Earle Robitaille 11 Victor Leipzig Jim Silva 11 Grace H. Winchell* Earle Robitaille Irvine 7 & 14 Barry Hammond Mike Ward• La Habra 2 William D. Mahoney* James H. Flora 3 James H. Flora William D. Mahoney* La Palma 3 Eva G. Miner* Wally Linn Los Alamitos 3 Charles E. Sylvia Ronald Bates* Newport Beach 5 Clarence Turner* Jean Watt 5 John C. Cox, Jr. Jean Watt 6 Evelyn Hart Jan Debay 7 Phil Sansone Jan Debay Placentia 2 Maria Moreno* Norman Z. Eckenrode Santa Ana 1 Robert Richardson Thomas E. Lutz 2 Miguel Pulido Thomas E. Lutz 3 Thomas E. Lutz Robert Richardson 7 Ted R. Moreno Miguel Pulido , Stanton 3 Sal A. Sapien Don Martinez* Villa Park 2 Bob Bell* Barry Denes Yorba Linda 2 Henry W. Medea John M. Gullixson* 13 John M. Gullixson* Henry W. Wedaa ( ' Costa Mesa 1 James M. Ferryman Nate Reade �•✓ Sanitary Dist. 6 James A. Mahner Arthur Perry 7 Janes A. Wahner Pending -3- 01/13/93 DISTRICT 1 The Joint Chairman announced that the Election of Chairman office of Chairman of District No. 1 had been vacated by a change in Board representation and that election of a new Chairman would, therefore, be in order. Director Robert Richardson was then duly nominated and elected Chairman of District No. 1. DISTRICT 5 The Joint Chairman announced that the Election of Chairman office of Chairman of District No. 5 had been vacated by a change in Board representation and that election of a new Chairman would, therefore, be in order. Director John C. Cox, Jr. was then duly nominated and elected Chairman of District No. 5. DISTRICT 11 The Joint Chairman announced that the Election of Chairman pro tem office of Chairman pro tem of District No. 11 had been vacated by a change in Board representation and that election of a new Chairman pro tem would, therefore, be in order. Director Victor Leipzig was then duly nominated and elected Chairman pro tem of District No. 11. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Presentation of resolutions of Chairman presented plaques and appreciation and plaques to resolutions of appreciation to retiring Directors retiring active directors Dan Griset, who represented the City of Santa Ana on the Board of District No. 1; and Ruthelyn Plummer who represented the City of Newport Beach on the Board of District No. 6. The Joint Chairman reported that retiring active directors Pat McGuigan, former representative from Santa Ana; Bob Main, former representative from the Garden Grove Sanitary District; Arthur Newton, former representative from the City of Placentia; and Sally Anne Sheridan, former representative from the City of Irvine, were unable to attend the meeting that evening. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that two Adoption of resolutions of additional Directors had recently appreciation for retiring Directors retired from the Boards. Chairman Mahoney then introduced resolutions expressing the Boards' appreciation to those Directors. It was then moved, seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions expressing their appreciation to the retiring Directors and recognizing their outstanding contributions and dedication to public service: ..� 4 01/13/93 Resolution No. Director City/Agency District 93-10 Barry Denes Villa Park 2 93-11 Richard Partin Cypress 3 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. Joint Chairman Mahoney added that plaques were being prepared and would be formally presented to each of the Directors at a future meeting. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed Presentation of District pins to newly-seated Directors Gail Kerry, new Directors James Ferryman, Thomas E. Lutz, Maria Moreno, Ted R. Moreno and Clarence Turner to the Boards. He then presented pins bearing the Districts' logo to these Directors. The pins are similar to the service pins given to employees and recognize the Directors for their service on the Boards of the Sanitation Districts. ALL DISTRICTS Joint Chairman Mahoney announced that Report of the Joint Chairman a Joint Works Selection Committee was Scheduled to meet Wednesday, January 20th, at 12:00 p.m. He then announced that the Fiscal Policy Committee would meet on Wednesday, January 20th, at 5:30 p.m. It was further announced that an adjourned regular meeting for Districts 3 and 7 would be held on Wednesday, January 20th, at 7:30 p.m. Chairman Mahoney also called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, January 27th, at 5:30 p.m. , and invited Directors Jim Evans and Jim Ferryman to attend and participate in the discussions. He also announced that the Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee was scheduled to meet on Thursday, January 28th, at 5:30 p.m. The Joint Chairman then advised that the Joint Works Selection Committee would meet again on Monday, February 8th, at 12:00 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Sylvester reported that included Report of the General Manager in the Directors' meeting folders were copies of the final offering statement for the 1992 COP Refunding that recently took place. Also included in their folders was a copy of a statement that was published in one of the financial publications summarizing the transaction. The General Manager then reported that the new Directors' orientation and treatment plant tour was scheduled for Saturday, January 30th. He requested the Directors complete and return the forms that would be mailed to them relative to their attendance at this function so that staff could complete the necessary arrangements. l ' -5- 01/13/93 DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or r..� Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 9, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 9, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 9, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 9, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 9, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 9, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT it There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 9, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 9, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held December 9, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -6- 01/13/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A", "B" and "C" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 12/02/92 12/16/92 12/30/92 ALL DISTRICTS -� Joint Operating Fund - $ 775,156.23 $ 923,566.82 $ 958,320.41 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 466,507.84 1,150,363.26 1,948,301.24 Joint Working Capital Fund - 140,120.84 304,305.84 227,653.81 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 143,128.B9 200,407.79 46,760.89 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 1,876.54 5,200.21 340.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 24,293.62 857,839.58 33,432.88 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 37,450.91 55,204.58 11,705.64 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 5,042.39 3,721.95 3,597.70 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 315.37 345.93 -O- DISTRICT NO. 7 - 9,462.94 25,979.38 11,719.57 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 1,758.54 8$ 94.46 635.00 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 5.20 104.47 -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 - 4,897.60 26,864.74 6,990.11 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 3,212.36 21,562.76 4,219.50 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - -0- 1,972.30 31.10 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT 5,218.65 12.53 5,126.85 11,618,447.92 $3,585,846.60 $3,258,834.70 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Two 2 Each Four-Wheel Electric Personnel That the bid tabulation and Carriers, Specification No. A-163, recommendation re award of Purchase to Nordskog Electric Vehicles of Two (2) Each Four-Wheel Electric Company Personnel Carriers, Specification No. A-163, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Nordskog Electric Vehicles Company for a total amount not to exceed $7,198.00 plus sales tax. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Purchase of Fifteen 15 Each Four-Wheel Electric Cargo That the bid tabulation and Carriers, Specification No. A-164, recommendation re award of Purchase to Nordskog Electric Vehicles of Fifteen (15) Each Four-Wheel Company Electric Cargo Carriers, Specification No. A-164, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to to Nordskog ' Electric Vehicles Company for a total amount not to exceed $62,985.00 plus sales tax. -7- 01/13/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Zymark That staff be, and is hereby, Corporation for Purchase of One authorized to issue a purchase order Automated Biochemical Ox en to Zymark Corporation in the amount Demand Analyzer Specification of $125,572.50 plus sales tax and No. E-223 freight, for Purchase of One Automated Biochemical Oxygen Demand Analyzer (Specification No. E-223). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to bioMerieux Vite , That staff be, and is hereby, Inc. for Purchase of Automated authorized to issue a purchase order Bacterial Identification System to bioMerieux Vitek, Inc. in the Specification No. E-224 amount of $37,130.00 plus sales tax and freight, for Purchase of Automated Bacterial Identification System (Specification No. E-224). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase order to Applied That staff be, and is hereby, Biosystems, Inc. for Purchase of authorized to issue a purchase order Automated DNA Sequencing System to Applied Biosystems, Inc. in the Specification No. E-225 total amount of $118,412.00 plus sales tax and freight, for Purchase of Automated DNA Sequencing System (Specification No. E-225). ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: �.�.� Awarding pen Office Furniture Systems and Free Standing That the bid tabulation and Furniture, Specification No. M-042, recommendation re award of Open to Centre 0Int commercial Interiors Office Furniture Systems and Free and or Harpers, Inc. Standing Furniture, Specification No. M-042, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase be, and is hereby, awarded to Centrepoint Commercial Interiors and/or Harpers, Inc. for a total amount not to exceed $222,884.44 plus tax and freight. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Landscape Maintenance, Specification That the Boards of Directors hereby No. M-043, to Toyo Landscaping adopt Resolution No. 93-1, receiving Company and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Landscape Maintenance, Specification No. M-043, to Toyo Landscaping Company for a one-year period beginning February 1, 1993, for the maximum annual amount of $41,092.74, with option for four one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. �� -8- O1/13/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Uniform and Janitorial Articles Rental Service, That bid tabulation and Specification No. P-128, to Mission recommendation re award of Uniform Uniform and Linen Service and Janitorial Articles Rental Service, Specification No. P-128, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Mission Uniform and Linen Service for a three-year period beginning March 1, 1993, with option for two one-year extensions. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Replacement of Air Filter Media and Related That the Boards of Directors hereby Services, Specification No. -066, adopt Resolution No. 93-2, receiving to P. L. Hawn Company and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Replacement of Air Filter Media and Related Services, Specification No. S-066, to P. L. Hawn Company for a total amount not to exceed $29,592.00 plus sales tax for a one-year period beginning January 15, 1993, with option for four one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue purchase orders for disposal of classified That staff be, and is hereby, materials and wastes authorized to issue purchase orders to the following for disposal of classified materials and wastes under the County of Orange Cooperative Agreement, pursuant to the requirements of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, for a one-year period ending October 12, 1993, renewable for two years contingent upon negotiations with the County of Orange in an annual amount not to exceed a total of $100,000.00 (Specification No. S-067) : . Disposal Control Service, Inc. . Greenfield Services . California Chemical Disposal , Inc. Directors Don R. Roth and Roger R. Stanton requested that their abstention from voting on award of purchase order to Disposal Control Service, Inc. due to a conflict in accordance with Government Code Section 84308 be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No. 3 to the plans No. I-9 and specifications for Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, and Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall , Job No. J-22-2, authorizing an addition of $34,610.00 to the contract with Colich Bros. , Inc. dba Colich and Sons for one item pertaining to a contract-authorized sales tax adjustment, be, and is hereby, approved. -9- O1/13/93 ALL DISTRICTS Director Collins requested that Item Approving Change Order No. 17 to Nos. 1 through 9 be included for the plans antl specifications for review and negotiation of cost Job No. J-19-1 recovery from the engineering consultant for this change order. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 17 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing a net addition of $227,666.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for nine items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 75 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34A Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Di ester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. -21 Approving Change Order No. 15 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the lans and s ec ifications for Job Nos. P1- 4-3, PI-35-2 and J-21 That Change Order No. 15 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of $823,704.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for two items of added or deleted work, and for a contract-specified bonus payment for 274 days early completion of certain work, based on the rate of $3,000.00 per day, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Job Nos. P1-34-3, PS-35-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: and J-21 d5 complete That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-3, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Stiffeners for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 Effluent That the Boards of Directors hereby Launders, Job No. P1-33-1, to adopt Resolution No. 93-4, receiving S. S. Mechanical and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Stiffeners for Primary Clarifiers Nos. 6-15 Effluent Launders, Jab No. P1-33-1, to S. S. Mechanical , in the total amount of $39,572.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -10- 01/13/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and negotiate That the Selection Committee be, and a Professional Services Agreement is hereby, authorized to solicit for design and programming services proposals and negotiate a required for Job No. J-31 Professional Services Agreement for design and programming services required for Expansion of Existing Computerized Monitoring and Control Systems at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-31. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with Ecoanalysis, Inc. That the Selection Committee for Phase I Upgrade of Compliance certification of the final negotiated Database Management System, fee relative to the Professional Specification No. 5-064 Services Agreement with Ecoanalysis, Inc. for Phase I Upgrade of Compliance Database Management System, Specification No. S-064, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-5, approving said agreement with Ecoanalysis, Inc. for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, plus direct expenses and fixed profit, for a total .amount not to exceed $90,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection comnittee to solicit proposals and negotiate That the Selection Committee be, and a Professional Services Agreement is hereby, authorized to solicit for design and construction proposals and negotiate a services for Job Nos. P1-44 and Professional Services Agreement for P2-53 design and construction services required for Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-44, and Seismic Retrofit at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-53. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of staff in issuing a purchase order to That the action of staff in issuing a Manley's Boiler Repair Co. , Inc. purchase order to Manley's Boiler for Emergency Repair of No. 1 Repair Co., Inc. for Emergency Repair Boiler at Plant No. 2 and hook-up of No. 1 Boiler at Plant No. 2 and of tem orar auxiliar boiler hook-up of temporary auxiliary Specification No. R-039 boiler, for a total amount not to exceed $50,000.00 (Specification No. R-039), be, and is hereby, ratified. -11- 01/13/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate a Professional That the Selection Committee be, and �✓ Services Agreement with John is hereby, authorized to negotiate a Carollo En 'nee rs to re are lans Professional Services Agreement with antl specifications an to provide John Carollo Engineers to prepare construction support services for plans and specifications and to Job Nos. J-33 and J-34 provide construction support services for Standby Power Reliability Modifications, Job No. J-33, and Ocean Outfall Reliability Upgrades, Job No. J-34. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing renewal of memberships In CASA and AMSA for 1993 That renewal of memberships in the California Association of Sanitation Agencies (CASA) and the Association of Metropolitan Sewerage Agencies (AMSA) for the 1993 calendar year, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Operations Center Ex ansion at Plant N0. 2 _ Job No. P2-23-5-1 Rebid No. 2 Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that twelve bids had been received, for this project, but that the first and second low bidders have requested withdrawal of their bids, citing errors. In addition, although the project bid call was listed in the construction industry' s �.,../ "Green Sheet", advertising in the newspaper was inadvertently overlooked. The Districts are legally required to advertise their projects in a local newspaper of general circulation. Therefore, on counsel 's advice, he recommended that all bids be rejected and authorizing to rebid the project be granted. Approving Addendum No. 3 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: lans and s ec' 'cations for Job No. P2-23-5-1 Rebid That Addendum No. 3 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid) , deleting Earthquake and Tidal Wave insurance requirements from the Schedule of Prices, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 4 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: lans and s ec ificdtions for Job No. P2-23-5-1 Rebid That Addendum No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid) , making miscellaneous technical modifications, be, and is hereby, approved. -12- O1/13/93 Re'ectin all bids for Job Moved, seconded and duly carried: No. P2-23-5-1 Re6id That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-6, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and rejecting all bids for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid) ; and FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to establish the date for receipt of bids for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2). Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to donation of surplus equipment to Tiajuana, Mexico Authorizing consideration of Moved, seconded and unanimously Supplemental Agenda item relative carried: donation of surplus equipment to Tiajuana, Mexico That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of a supplemental agenda item relative to donation of surplus equipment to Tiajuana, Mexico, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. Consideration of Request of Director Fred Barrera reported Director Barrera re donation of that he had received a request surplus equipment to Tiajuana, from the mayor of Tiajuana, Mexico Mexico, for any surplus pumps that might be available as they were in urgent need of equipment to relieve a disaster situation caused by recent storms and flooding. In response to the request from Director Barrera, Staff reported that the Districts did have some surplus equipment that could be made available for relief aid to the city of Tiajuana, Mexico, to assist in relieving the flood conditions in that community. Staff indicated that certain pumps and related items of equipment are not presently being used, and would not foreseeably have any future use for the Districts because of the elimination of several pump stations, that could be made available and disposed of as surplus property. General Counsel advised the Boards of their present resolution relating to the disposition of surplus property. He gave the opinion that the Boards could delegate to the staff authority to make transfers of such surplus equipment for the emergency relief to the City of Tiajuana. After discussion among several members of the Boards, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: -13- 01/13/93 That the Boards hereby authorize and approve the transfer of equipment which is determined by staff to be surplus to the Districts' present or future needs, to the City of Tiajuna, Mexico, upon verification that said transfer would be made to the proper municipal state or federal authorities. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:10 p.m. , January 13, 1993. _ DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to Wednesday, January 20, 1993 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:10 p.m. , January 13, 1993. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Addendum No. 3 to the Professional Services Agreement That the Board of Directors hereby with The Keith Companies for design adopts Resolution No. 93-7-5, and construction services for approving Addendum No. 3 to the Contract Nos. 5-35 and 5-36 Professional Services Agreement with The Keith Companies for design and construction services required for the South Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 5-35, and the Crystal Cove Pump Station, Contract No. 5-36, providing for additional design services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor including overhead, for an additional amount not to exceed $10,000.00, increasing the total authorized compensation from $206,357.00 to an amount not to exceed $216,357.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:10 p.m. , January 13, 1993. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:10 p.m. , January 13, 1993. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to Wednesday, January 20, 1993 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:10 p.m. , January 13, 1993. \J -14- 01/13/93 DISTRICT 2 The General Counsel reported that the Settlement Agreement with nited Source Control Division had determined it ompany that United Oil Company was responsible for the discharge of a large amount of gasoline into the District's sewer, which necessitated a , considerable emergency utilization of District personnel and equipment, and the incurring of disposal charges by the District relating to the contaminants for which the District has been seeking recovery. He then reviewed the terms of a settlement agreement that the District's staff and his office have negotiated providing for United Oil to pay to the District a penalty sum at this time, and to provide for future payments of additional sums to satisfaction of the enforcement action by the District for the unlawful discharge. The District's Source Control Manager provided a summary report of the events and the investigation undertaken by staff and responded to questions by the Directors. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the proposed Settlement Agreement, as submitted by General Counsel and staff be, and is hereby approved, and that the General Manager be authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:15 p.m. , January 13, 1993. DISTRICTS 13 8 14 Tpprovin First Amen ator Reim- bursement A reemant re Ca ita - Im rovement�Prograamm, 1 -1 9 beri, UUPS with ont al Westminster Bank PLC Verbal staff report The Director of Finance reported that when the 1992 advanced refunding took place last month in Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, Districts 13 and 14 did not participate as they were not in the 1986 COP issue nor in the 1990-92 Series A COP issue. A portion of that refunding created a new financing structure that wasn't contemplated or covered in the original agreement with National Westminster Bank. The First Amendatory Reimbursement Agreement is the same agreement the other Districts executed and also provides some flexibility and creative financing opportunities in the future. -15- O1/13/93 Approving First Amendatory Moved, seconded and duly carried Reimbursement Agreement by each respective District: That its Board of Directors hereby adopts the fallowing resolution approving a First Amendatory Reimbursement Agreement re Capital Improvement Program, 1990-1992 Series A COPS with National Westminster Bank PLC: District Resolution 13 93-8-13 14 93-9-14 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m., January 13, 1993. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:18 p.m., January 13, 1993. DISTRICT 11 Actions re Emergency Oil C can-Up Services at Treatment Plant No. 2 and the Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-ZR Verbal report of staff The Assistant Superintendent of Operations and the Source Control Manager reported to the Directors about an oil spill that recently occurred from an unknown source in District 11. Operations Division staff discovered excessive amounts of oil from an unknown source in the Treatment Plant No. 2 primary sedimentation basins during the evening of December 7, 1992. The Districts' Source Control Division was notified of the discovery on Tuesday, December 8, and clean-up efforts were initiated. The clean-up efforts confined the oil to the primary basins and prevented the occurrence Of operational problems in other areas of the plant. To minimize the disposal costs the oil was transferred to holding tanks from which the water was decanted by Crosby 8 Overton. The oil was then transferred by Asbury Environmental Service to an off-site oil refinery and recovery site. In seeking to trace the source of the oil , on Wednesday, December 9, 1992, Collection Facilities Division staff determined that a large quantity of oil was backed-up behind the inverted siphon portion of the Coast Trunk sewer and the clean-up activities at that location were started and continue to date. -16- O1/13/93 The Districts' Source Control staff has been attempting to track the source of the oil but, to date, has been unsuccessful . There are 38 permitted oil well producers that are connected to the Coast Trunk Sewer. Four of these producers are fairly large, discharging up to 20,000 gallons per day of wastewater. Another five producers are in the range of discharging 5,000 to 20,000 gallons per day, with the balance of the producers being quite small producing as little as four barrels of oil per day. Staff is working with the City of Huntington Beach fire department and the sewer department checking any information they might have about abandonments, spills, etc. Staff is also collecting production and wastewater discharge information on the producers from the oil and gas departments. Staff will also be increasing their inspection of these types of facilities in the future to hopefully avoid this type of situation. Districts' staff estimates that the cost of clean-up and remedial activities will not exceed $195,000 for transport and disposal of the oil and an additional $105,000 for cleanup services. Therefore, in accordance with the Districts' emergency procurement provisions, staff requested that the Board ratify staff actions in issuing emergency purchase orders for the emergency cleanup to Crosby 8 Overton Transportation Co. , Inc. , in an amount not to exceed $105,000.00 and to Asbury Environmental Service in an amount not to exceed $195,000.00. Ratifying action of staff in Moved, seconded and duly carried: issuing purchase orders for Contract No. 11-13-2R That the action of staff in Issuing purchase orders for Emergency Oil Clean-Up Services at Treatment Plant No. 2 and the Coast Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 11-13-2R, to Crosby 8 Overton Transportation Co. , Inc. in an amount not to exceed $105,000.00; and to Asbury Environmental Service in an estimated amount not to exceed $195,000.00, be, and is hereby, ratified. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m. , January 13, 1993. ZZ40C As istant Se e r f the Boards of Directors f C4Vty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -17- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11/i1/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 [AUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Of ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/02/92 POSTING DATE 12/02/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR - AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126193 ACGIH. INC. 261.00 PUBLICATION 126185 A T 3 T 33r$50.00 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 126106 ACLU-LABS RESEARCH INC 350.00 LAB SRRVIC88 126187 ADVANCU CONSTRUCTORS INC s29$107.75 CONSTRUCTION PI-30-3 126187 AIR LF PRODUCTS i CHEMICALS 7 $1UT.55 AIR QUALITY ARBTING ' 126189 ALPA-LA VSU INC 3345.93 FREIGHT PARTS 126190 ALLIED SUPPLY CO 305.51 FREIGHT 126192 ANAHEIM INC $$97.25 LAB SUPPLIES 126192 ANAHEIN SAY SHOP INC f97.25 BAN RBPAIRB 126193 ANTSONY-SLABOR MECH 3 MAGXINL. INC. f•$235.00 LAB SERVICES REPAIRS 126193 ABC LABORATORIES $691.00 LAB ORM RENT 126195 ARATEA SERVICES INC ,379.00 UNIFORM RENTALS 126195 ARMOONA INSTRUMENT i1.3T9.00 INSTRUMENT RBPAIRB 126197 ARMOR - VAC 31.608.91 STREET UILDI GSWEEPING MATERIALS >< 126190 ASSOCIATED CONCRETE PROD 1 ,005.50 BUILDING MREMOVAL9 X 126199 SAW SAFETY t0.008.50 GRITTY REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91 S 126199 BRV SAfCTY f SUPPLY S1.780.89 126200 B BATEMAN 3600.6E SAFETY SUPPLIES DEFERREDCOMP DISTRIBUTION 126201 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 31.102.7E BATTERIES 126203 BAXTE COMPRESSOR f58.67 COMPRESSOR PLI REPAIRS 12620J BAKTCR DIAGNOSTICS INC 399i52.48 LAB SUPPLIES n 226205 BELLCO SECURITY s152.08 LAB BUPPLISB F+ 1262 CS BELL SECURITY 3388.09 SAFETY SUPPLIES BRRVICB9 126207 BIO 101r INC $110.05 LAB SUPPLIES 126209 BIOSAFETT SYSTEMS, INC. f$76.06 LAB SUPPLIES 226209 BUENRIN6ER MANNXEIM 376.51 LAB SUPPLI88 126210 BOYLENA NN PUMPS. INC $/.211.51 PUMP PARTS 126211 BROWN ENGINEERING CORP 31.312.18 ENGINEERING SERVICES RESJ-1 92-127 126212 BROWN 3 CEMPOELLRIU CONSULTING SJ1.$12.71 HARDWARE SERVICeS J-19 126213 BUILDER'S ASSOCIATES 312.00 SURVEYING 126213 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC $11.500.09 SURVEYING SRRVIC88 M.0.6-10-92 126215 CART G STPECD $1.609.41 PETTY CABS REINBURSBMBNT 126216 CS COMPANY 31$376.62 1"PLUMBING SUPPLIB9 126217 CAL-GLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. 3388.62 LAB SUPPLIES 12621T CALIFOL INC t99795.17 SERVICE 126219 CALIFORNIA AUTOMATIC SATE 3795.13 ENGINEERING ING SERVICES 126220 JOHN MDT/CASTLE O ENGINEERS l09$104.60 LAB SUPPLIES SB PVIC88 PI-20, P1-39, P1-3 126221 MDT/CASTLE $575.00 LAB SCAPING 226222 CENTURY T/BEGIN ASSOC. INC 9691.00 LANDSCAPING EBRWIEBE 126222 CENTURY PAINT ,859.87 PAINT EKINGSUPPLIESSE 126223 CHURCH ENGINEERINGCHLORINATION INC fl1r869.87 CHLORINATION SERVICES 2-9-RI 126225 COASTAL CNL OCOMPONEN S240.00 CHLORINATION PARTS 126225 COMPRESSOR IDAT COMPONENTS Of CA $S.SSl.13 MECHANCIELECTRIC P PARTS 126227 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST fT.897.13 TOOLS PARTS 126220 CONTINENTAL CAIRHEMICAL TOOLS INC 3296.25 TOOLS 12622P CONTINENTAL CXEN IC AL CO i1.616.2E CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11/24/92 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/62/92 POSTING DATE 12/02/92 WARRANT MD. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126229 CONTRACTOR'S BOOK STORE $299.90 BOOKS 126230 CONTROL DATA CORPORATION $095.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 126231 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC $1.150.16 ELECTRIC PARTS 226232 CHARLES P CROWLEY CO $525.19 - PUMP PARTS 126233 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 5374.Tc TIRES 126234 DEAVER MANUFACTURING CO. 3301.66 TRUCK REPAIRS 126235 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $189.53 LAB SUPPLIES 126236 THE DICKSON COMPANY 359.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 126237 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $192.87 PRINTING 126238 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 51.279.04 HARDWARE 126239 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC A2.370.09 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 12624C DUNN EDWARDS CORP 5161.24- PAINT SUPPLIES 126241 EIMCO PROCESS EQUIP CO 36.749.46 SKIMMER PARTS 126242 EASTMAN INC $2.349.79 OFFICE SUPLLIES FTI 126243 ECOANALYSIS INC 37.L01.75 COMPUTER SOFTWARE >C 126244 EDMUND SCIENTIFIC $84.50 LAB SUPPLIES 126245 EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWARE $62.32 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 11y 126246 EMERALD SYSTEMS 5575.50 OFFICE REPAIRS 126247 ENCHANTER INC 35.b00.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 126268 ENGINEERS SALES-SERVICE CO $1.103.36 MECHANICAL PARTS y 126249 MARSHALL FAIRRES $128.08 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1 126250 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $3,900.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.20-9-91 N 126251 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN PE 53.400.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16 126252 FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP $195.50 AIR FREIGHT 126253 FERRELLGAS $51.03 PROPANE 126254 FILTER SUPPLY CU 3244.9♦ FILTERS 126255 FISCHER A PORTER CO $1,751.72 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 226256 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO S1.b19.64 LAB SUPPLIES 22625T FISONS INSTRUMENTS $178.35 LAB SUPPLIES 226258 FOUNTAIN .VALLEY CAMERA 512.27 FILM 126259 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY 34.431.55 WATER USE 126260 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $9.649.03 PAINT SUPPLIES 226261 F0Y INDUSTRIAL SALES 5249.55 HARDWARE 126262 THE FOXBORO CO $2.854.28 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126263 FRANKLIN INTERNATIONAL INST. $279.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 126264 FRAIEE PAINT A WALLCOVERING 3103.44 PAINT SUPPLIES 126265 BUD FREY $21.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 126266 G.C. INDUSTRIES $645.62 LAB SUPPLIES 126267 GST. INC. $992.42 COMPRESSOR PARTS 126268 GANAHL LUMBER CO $37.53 HARDWARE/LUMBER 226269 GARRATT-CALLAHAN COMPANY 62,991.68 LAB SUPPLIES 126270 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CU. 52.206.80 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 126271 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $112.09 TELEPHONE SERVICES 126272 GENOSTS SIOTECHNOLOGICS $1.480.00 LAB SUPPLIES 126273 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC 31.138.69 MECHANICAL PARTS 126274 WW GRAINGER INC $211.45 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 — JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL a PROCESSING DATE 11/24/92 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/02/92 POSTING DATE 12/02/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126275 THOMAS GRAY S ASSOC INC SB98.V0 LAB SERVICES 126276 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING $163.07 PRINTING 126271 DON GREEN L ASSOCIATES $25,913.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 126278 GREENFIELD, TURDOW. SCHIFF NOS $135.00 MEDICAL SERVICES 126279 M.F. SCIEN71FIC 9228.82 LAB EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 126200 HACH COMPANY $90.3W CHEMICALS 126281 HARBOUR ENGINEERING $8,668.56 PUMP PARTS 126282 FRED A HARFER $1,500.60 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 126283 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL FLASTI $1,598.97 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 126284 MATCH L KIRK INC $239.15 ENGINE PARTS 126285 EG HELLER.S SON INC $82.92 TOOLS 126286 HEWLETT PACKARD $690.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 126287 RC HOFFMAN AND/OR ISCO 921.420.76 LAB SUPPLIES 126288 J.T. HORVATH L ASSOC. $2,822.40 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, 3-17 F17 126289 AS HUGHES CO INC $799.61 PAINT SUPPLIES X 12629D HUNTER CORPORATION 9218,084.46 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 = 126291 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER SIR $39.23 RUBBER STAMPS 126292 NUNTINGTON VALLEY TOOL $60.50 TOOL RENTALS 126293 I 0 E R 1168.51 COMPUTER SERVICES 126294 1.G. INDUSTRIAL CORP. 32.7R 7.83 CHEMICALS 126295 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $18,484.51 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-18-92 a 126296 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $602.51 CONNECTORS IN 126291 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP $1,025.54 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 126298 JAYS CATERING $994.76 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE 126299 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO $1.031.90 INSTRUMENT PARTS 226300 JN JOHNSON GENERAL CONTE S175.OG BUILDING REPAIRS 1263C1 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY $900.54 ELECTRIC PARTS 126302 JONES CHEMICALS INC S4.CT3.95 CHEMICALS 126303 WILLIAM C. JUDD 61,500.00 SEWER CONNECTION FEE REFUND 126304 KALLEEN.S COMPUTER PRODUCTS S163.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES 126305 KEEN-KUT ABRASIVE CO $904.06 TOOLS 126306 KEENAN L ASSOCIATES 32.475.09 SAFETY SUPPLIES - 126307 KING BEARING INC S1.985.00 MECHANICAL PARTS 126308 KNOX INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES $4,519.23 TOOLS 126309 MARTIN KORDICK SR $1,958.87 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 126310 L.A.S. INCORPORATED 97,163.94 INSTRUMENTATION REPAIRS 126311 LA TRONICS $123.79 VIDEO SUPPLIES 126322 LEARN KEY S184.90 TRAINING VIDEO 126313 CHARLES P. CROWLEY CO. S965.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126314 LIMITOROUE CORP $963.93 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 126315 KP LINDSTROM INC 96.473.66 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING H.O.30-10-90 126316 LOS ANGELES TIMES $3.215.29 NOTICES 6 ADS 126317 MARINE L VALVE SUPPLY $427.54 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 126318 MCKENNA ENGR L EQUIP $820.34 PUMP PARTS 126319 MIDWAY MFG L MACHINING $18,981.24 MECHANICAL PARTS 126320 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO $490.00 ELECTRIC PARTS OUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11/24/92 PAGE A REPORT NUMBER AP43 ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/02/92 POSTING DATE 12/02192 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126321 MITCHELL PACIFIC CONSTRUCTORS $2.172.5C CONSTRUCTION 7-11-2 126322 MONTGOMERY LAUORA70RIES $7.197.06 LAB SERVICES 226323 MOORE PRODUCTS CO $164.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126324 MORTON SALT AND/OR $467.26 SALT 126325 NOTION INDUSTRIES INC 61T6.98 MECHANICAL PARTS 126326 NEAL SUPPLY CO 51.303.39 OIL 126327 CUON6 NGUYEN $4.009.00 EMERGENCY DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 126328 NOROAL CONTROLS INC $55.56 MECHANICAL PARTS 126329 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SERVICES S740.70 SAFETY GLASSES 126330 OK SYSTEMS CO 5379738.15 CHLORINS M.0.10-9-91 126331 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO S2.129.15 CHEMICALS 126332 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUPPLY C 3297.23 GROUNOSKEEPING SUPPLIES 126333 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. $994.43 FITTINGS m 126334 ORRICK HERRINGTON G SUTCLIFFE 65.G60.GU ARBITRAGE ANALYSIS 126335 CSOOC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL I 5100.000.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE 2 126336 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $5.402.06 WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT W126337 COUNTY OF ORAN6E $347.40 PERMIT FEES 12633E PSI $151.68 MECHANICAL PARTS 126339 PSSI $937.50 SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 126340 PACIFIC MECHANICAL SUPPLY $90.33 MBCHANCIAL SUPPLIES 126341 PACIFIC PARTS - $1.890.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS - 126342 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $8.579.26 SAFETY SUPPLIES t 126343 PACIFIC BELL 5975.22 TELEPHONE SERVICES 126349 PADRE JANITORIAL BURP 5926.07 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 1263/5 PARTS UNLIMITED Si.121.78 TRUCK PARTS 126346 ROY PENDERGRAFT 9460.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 126347 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION 617.598.9O LAB EQUIPMENT 126348 PERORIDATION SYSTEMS INC 55.603.00 CHEMICALS 126349 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $145,022.50 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 126350 POLYPURE INC $13.128.05 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 126351 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 59.960.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 126352 BRAS INC 5369.06 PRINTING SUPPLIES 126353 QUESTRON COOP $16.800.90 LAB SUPPLIES 126354 RAININ INSTRUMENT CO 5952.75 LAB SUPPLIES 126355 NEIGH MARINE STUDIES. INC $1.160.G6 OCEAN MONITORING 126356 NCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $4.784.84 PLUMBZNG SUPPLIES 126357 ROBBINS SCIENTIFIC $396.56 LAB SUPPLIES 126358 ROSEMOUNT INC. $949.65 INSTRUMENT 126359 PEGGY RUPP $540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 126360 RYAN-NERCO 3729.39 REGULATOR 126361 JOSEPH T RYERSON S SON IN 41.289.46 METAL 126362 S G E INC. S3C7.18 LAB SUPPLIES 1263E3 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $3.392.17 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 126365 DOUG SARVIS S400.00 . CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 126365 SLIMED A CORP $148.50 LAB SUPPLIES 126366 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $68.71 TOOLS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11/24/92 PAGE 5 ' REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/02/92 POSTING DAIS 12/U2/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126367 - SHASTA ELECTRIC SB.V00.60 ELECTRIC SERVICES 126368 SHERWOOD MEDICAL CO $105.26 LAB SUPPLIES 126369 SMURELUCK SALES $6.605.08 TOOLS/HARDWARE 126370 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO 172.18 LAB SUPPLIES 126371 SKVPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI $35.00 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 126372 SOUTHERN CALIF EOISON CO $418,723.19 POWER 126373 SO CAL GAS CO 39.W19.31 NATURAL GAS 12637/ SPARKLETTS DRINKING WATER 92,269.22 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 126375 SPEAKER SUPPORT $374.95 PRESENTATION AIDS 126376 SPECTRUN-HUMAN RESOURCE SVS 9655.00 BOOKS 126377 SPEX INDUSTRIES INC $492.39 1." SUPPLIES 126370 SUPER CHEN CORP 51.338.85 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 126379 TRAVEL TRAVEL 52.869.5E TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 m 126380 NO TRERICE CO $402.62 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES X 126381 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY INC 61.33C.99 TRUCK PARTS S 126382 JG TUCKER S SON INC 1908.08 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126383 US AUTO GLASS CENTERS 538.79 TRUCK PARTS 126384 UNITED NOTTINGHAM 599.05 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 126365 UNITED TAPE CORPORATION $583.98 VIDEO TAPES Y 126386 VWR SCIENTIFIC 62,156.26 LAB SUPPLIES 126387 VALIN CORPORATION $71.41 LAB SUPPLIES 126388 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $2.975.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 126389 WEST COAST INSTRUMENTS $2,567.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126390 WESTERN PACIFIC EQUIPMENT C 3223.59 FILTER 126391 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY $16.436.78 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.9-12-92 126392 WESCO $3.647.46 ELECTRIC PARTS 126393 VHESSOE VAREC S3.240.22 MECHANICAL PARTS 126394 WITE6 SCIENTIFIC 6052.55 LAB SUPPLIES 126395 BOURKE A WOODRUFF 6 OR $120,367.63 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 126396 XEROX CORP 513.972.7i COPIER LEASES 126397 EVERETT H WORK CO $691.02 ENGINE PARTS 126398 RICHARD YOUNG PROD S9T.lU TRUCK PARTS 126399 RICHARD B EDGAR 3200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/02/92 $1.618.997.9; FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 11/24/92 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/02/92 POSTING DATE 22/02/92 SUMMARY AMOUNT 41 OPER FUND $1,281.54 41 CAP PAC FUND $595.00 42 OPER FUND $6,283.75 42 CAP FAC FUND 418,009.87 A3 OPER FUND $37,450.91 45 OPER FUND $899.19 45 CAP FAC FUND $4,143.20 46 OPER FUND $315.37 _ N7 OPER FUND $2,947.04 47 CAP FAC FWD $6,515.90 m 412 OPER FUND $1,758.54 X 413 OPEN FUND $5.20 Z 414 OPER FUND $111.40 014 CAP PAC FUND $4,786.20 4566 OPER FOND $3,212.36 47614 OPER FUND $5,218.65 JT OPER FWD $775,156.23 Oa CORF $466,507.84 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $143,128.89 JT DIST'WORKING CAPITAL FUND $140,120.04 -------------- $1,618,447.92 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/10/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1./16192 POSTING DATE 12/16/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126439 A-1 FENCE CO INC Sb32.00 FENCE INSTALLATION 126440 AS TECH COMPANY 956.972.85 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 126441 AM BEST COMPANY $43.75 PUBLICATION 126442 ASP ANALYSIS 51.020.00 ENGINE VIBRATION TESTING 226443 AMERICAN TELEPHONE 6 TELEGRAPH 11,363.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE 126A00 A T A T $220.14 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE 126445 ACCURATE CIRCUIT ENGINEERING $218.7U REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT 126646 ACTION DOOR REPAIR CORP S2T6.57 DOOR REPAIRS 126447 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC 51.220.33 REFRIGERANT 126448 AIR INDUSTRIES CORP 55.233.44 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126449 AIR PRODUCTS A CHEMICAL IN $33.630.OV SERVICE AGREEMENT 126450 ALCO BATTERY $626.85 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126451 ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY CO LTD $532.15 PLUIOING PARTS 12E952 ALLIED ELECTRONICS $131.60 ELSCYRIC SUPPLIES rn X 126453 ALTA - ROBBINS $232.18 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES Z 126450 ROBCO INC A/OR AMERICAN SEALS 11.943.b5 GASKETS 126555 ANAHEIM MEDICAL SQUARE 5141.30 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT CO 126456 BLAKE P ANDERSON 5117.51 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 226657 AN TITER - DISTRIBUTION $986.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 126958 AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY $500.00 OCEAN MONITORING CIT 126059 ARATEA SERVICES INC $6,945.59 UNIFORM RENTALS 1 326468 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $1d28.64 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126461 ARROWHEAD PRODUCTS $3.327.10 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126462 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $65.00 WASTE OIL DISPOSAL 126463 ASSOC. ADMINIS. A CONSULTANTS 99D7.79 MEDICAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATION 126464 AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 119.227.7b PAYROLL SERVICES 126963 AWARDS A TROPHIES SSS.13 DIRECTORS' PLAQUES 126466 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC $452.55 SAFETY SUPPLIES 126067 BRA LANDFILL 93.bO7.95 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 126A68 SAW SAFETY A SUPPLY $960.65 SAFETY SUPPLIES 126469 BAKER PLYWOOD CO INC 11.562.76 BUILDING MATERIALS 126470 BANANA BLUEPRINT *12.551.53 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES 126471 BARTLETT CENTER 96.314.38 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT 126672 BATTERY SPECIALTIES S122.66 BATTERIES 126473 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 63,539.36 LAB SUPPLIES 12607/ RAZZ HOUSTON COMPANY $361.51 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126475 BEACH-LIN PLAZA $310.66 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 226476 BENTLEY NEVADA 39.620.32 GAS COMPRESSOR 126477 010 101. INC 5258.6E LAB SUPPLIES 126478 TOM bISTLINE CONST. CO $14,253.00 CONCRETE REPAIRS 126479 BOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 562.50 RADIATOR REPAIRS 1264AO BON-A-R UES 5587.76 TRUCK PARTS 126081 BORNEMANN PUMPS. INC $120963.Uu PUMP PARTS 126482 BOYLE ENGINEERING CORP $42,617.64 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-37-3, 5-19 126083 BRISTOL INDUSTRIES 52.152.97 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126404 @ROADWAY MEDICAL CENTER $519.61 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORNINb CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE 12/1J/92 PAGE . REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/16/92 POSTING BATE 12/16/92 WARRANT 00. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126465 STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION CO S23.04.00 CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3. 2-28, 2-29 126406 STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION LO 62u.066.06 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-26-3 126407 BUDGET JANITORIAL 21.650.00 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 126408 BUILDER'S LMPORIUM 5179.51 HARDWARE/LUMBER 126489 BURKE ENGINEERING CO $55.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 126990 $ART 6 STREEU $4.671.45 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 126491 CM2N HILL 5977.56 ENGINEERING SERVICES 126492 C M 1 62.155.44 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 226493 CS COMPANY $2,481.53 VALVE 126494 CALTROL INC SX.910.41 HARDWARE 126495 CAMPO CONFERENCE •93 9275.66 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 126496 CALIF ASSOC OF SAN AGENCIE 9SC4.46 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 126497 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC 51.234.67 TRUCK PARTS fn 126496 CALIF SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL $50.90 MEMBERSHIP DUES 126499 CALIFORNIA TAKPAYERS• ASSOC. $58.99 SUBSCRIPTION < 1265CO CALMONT EN6 S ELECTS CORP. 3359.12 REFUND USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 126501 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $78,432.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38 OG 226502 CENTURY PAINT $01.62 PAINT SUPPLIES 126503 CENTURY SAFETY IMST G $OPP SB.UB9.58 SAFETY SUPPLIES 126504 AN CHESTERTON LA $980.69 OIL C" 126505 CITY WIRE CLOTH INC 31.750.BU MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 1 126506 CLA-VAL COMPANY 92,421.79 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT N 126507 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING S1Bl.U9 FREIGHT 126008 COAST FIRE EOUIFMENI $542.91 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 126509 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO 5121.45 METER 126510 COLICH AND SUNS $978.086.80 CONSTRUCTION I-9 126511 COLOR CITY INC 51.979.71 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126512 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 6685.0U REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126513 COMPUSA. INC. $697.43 MECHANICAL PARTS 126514 COMPUSERVC $13.03 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 126515 CONARD•S PHOTOGRAPHY 1530.76 COMPUTER SERVICES 126516 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 95.926.89 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 126517 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 53.392.89 TOOLS 126510 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 6:.616.25 CHLORINE M.O.30-9-91 126519 CONTINENTAL LAB PRODUCTS $3,117.06 LAB SUPPLIES 126-20 CONTRACTORS BOOK STORE $405.50 PUBLICATION 126521 CONTROL DATA CLRP A/OR $3,219.25 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 126522 COPY RITE PRESS INC 6:.649.14 PRINTING 12E523 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY 5056.09 TRUCK PARTS 126524 COUNCIL ON EDUCATION 5195.40 TRAINING REGISTRATION 126525 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC &SC8.48 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 126526 THE REGENT$ OF THE UNIVLRSITY 530028.60 WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE 126527 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 623.27 PROCUREMENT FEE 126528 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 514.190.00 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 126529 CALTRANS - PUBLICATION UNIT 5122.64 PUBLICATION 126530 DAILY PILOT 689.4D NOTICES 6 ADS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/1019L PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/16/92 POSTING DATE 12/16/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126531 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE S1.121.Ce TIRES 126532 DE ANZA CORPORATION 3150.DU EQUIPMENT RENTALS 126533 DE ANZA BAYSIDE VILLAGE $3.989.77 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126534 DEBIN ENTERPRISES INC $402.98 ELECTRIC PARTS 126535 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 31.875.46 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-12-92 126536 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $814.59 PRINTING 126537 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC 3992.50 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 126538 DUNN EDWARDS CORP $1,180.51 PAINT SUPPLIES 126539 ECD IELECTRO CHEMICAL BEVI $899.84 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126540 EIMCO PROCESS EQUIP CO $1,874.85 MECHANICAL PARTS 126541 EASTMAN INC $3.493.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 126542 EATON CORP/MSC PRODUCTS 91,022.46 . REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126543 ECOANALVSIS INC $4.073.75 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.7-17-91 126544 EL RANCHO NORTH 5655.41 REFUND USER PER OVERPAYMENT X226545 ENCHANTER INC $3,360.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-12-92 = 226546 ENERGY SAYINGS SYSTEM 3896.Cu MVAC SYSTEM REPAIRS 126547 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $2.600.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.30-9-91 to 126548 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN PE $3.400.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16 126549 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP $862.75 AIR FREIGHT 126550 FERRELL&AS $82.93 PROPANE UU 126551 FILTERLINE CORP 393.95 PUMP PARTS 126552 FINANCIAL MODELING SPECIALISTS 355.60 COMPUTER SOFTMARS LN 226553 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO 53.95T.28 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 126554 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $4.122.01 LAB SUPPLIES 126555 FISONS INSTRUMENTS 3600.0u TRAINING REGISTRATION 126556 FLO-SYSTEMS $169.11 PUMP PARTS 126551 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $169.52 FILM 126558 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $452.36 PAINT SUPPLIES 126559 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES 11,017.65 HARDWARE 12f560 CITY OF FULLERTON $45.75 WATER USE 126561 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 3919.84 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 126562 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $618.36 TELEPHONE SERVICES 126563 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC $1.798.44 PUMP PARTS 126564 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 64.04.Su FILM 126565 GREAT AMERICAN PRINTING 3616.4E PRINTING 126566 DON GREEK A ASSUCIATES 33u.130.06 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 126567 GRUMMAN AEROSPACE CORP 53.12C.a8 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12656E HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 51.831.75 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 126569 HACH COMPANY Si59.49 CHEMICALS 126570 HAMILTON MATERIALS 32.603.73 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126571 HATCH 1 KIRK INC 544.23 MECHANICAL PARTS 126572 PL HAWN CO INC $305.15 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 126573 HERMAN MILLER INC Sb66.L3 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126574 HEWLETT PACKARD 3300.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126575 HILTI INC 3•.69.ib TOOLS 12076 J.T. HORVATH 6 ASSOC. 52.508.80 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/10/92 PAGE 4 . REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/16/92 POSTING DATE 12/16/92 WARRANT ND. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126577 RS HUGHES CU INC ib47.93 SAFETY SUPPLIES 126578 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $21.16 WATER USE 126519 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHYINN C $155.00 BICYCLE PARTS 126566 IC METERS PROPERTIES $4,595.53 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126501 ICN RADIOCHEMICALS DIVISION $1.248.58 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12E582 IMPERIAL WCST CHEMICAL $31.410.44 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-14-90 1265R3 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 3335.17 CONNECTORS 126564 INGRAM PAPER 636.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 126585 INSIDE E.P.A. $460.00 SUBSCRIPTION 126586 INTERCHEM CORP Sl.183.6b REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 726587 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1.90b.71 BATTERIES 126508 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $195.06 WATER USE 226589 JACKSON IMMUNORESEARCM LABS $61.50 LAB SUPPLIES 126590 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP $70.47 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES TIT 126591 JAY-S CATERING 3202.79 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSE X 126592 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO $1.642.69 METERS 126595 JIM.S SUSPENSION SERVICE YICE $25.00 TRUCE REPAIRS w 126594 JM JOHNSON GENERAL CONTE 1995.Cj CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 126595 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE C $2,211.03 TOOLS 126596 KAISER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT $1,943.92 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126597 KAISER ROLLMET 3345.0b REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT i 126598 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS $1.691.53 PUMP REPAIRS 126599 KNOW INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 33.1fi1.66 TOOLS 126600 KNUM INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 5423.62 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126601 MARTIN NORDICK SR $2.348.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 126602 KRAFT FOOD 53.331.81 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126603 LAM-PLATE TECH 3195.08 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126604 LAUNDROMAT $3.34 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126605 LAYMAN. JONES b DYE. LAWYERS 3S.G00.95 LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER INDUST. 126606 CHARLES P. CROWLEY CO. 52.126.61 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 226607 LIDO MARINA VILLAGE 53.411.62 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126606 LIMITORQUE CORP $425.66 ELECTRIC PARTS 126609 LIQUID AIR CORP $569.06 SPECIALTY GASES 226610 LITTLE BUY BLUE MOTEL 5211.82 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126611 HOC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL 3933.33 OCEAN MONITORING 126612 MPS 3527.75 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 126623 MACDONALO-STEPMENS LAB S1 d70.00 LAB SERVICES 126614 MACOMCO $1,103.15 SERVICE AGREEMENTS 126615 MAG SYSTEMS $006.60 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 126b16 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 2143.75 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 126617 MATT - CHLOR INC $613.90 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 126618 MCCOY SHEET METAL WORKS IN 9129.30 METAL 126619 MEADOWLARK MOBILE HOME EST 51.368.00 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 226620 MEASUREMENT CUNTROL SYS INC 5327.38 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 126621 MEMOREX 68#422,65 LAB EQUIPMENT 126622 MICROAGE OF CLRRITOS f6.442.56 OFFICE EQUIPMENT FUND NO 9199 - J7 UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 121"/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/16/92 POSTING DATE L2116192 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126623 MITSUBISHI CONSUMER ELECT $2.201.12 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126624 MLADEN SUNIICH CONSTRUCTION 3556.293.36 CONSTRUCTION 2-30 126625 NOTION INDUSTRIES INC 152:58 HARDWARE 126626 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY SUPPLIES 126627 NEAL SUPPLY CO $135.77 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES ' 126628 NEWPORT AUTO CENTER 6619.39 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126629 NEWPORT HARBOR YACHT CLUB $1,164.15 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126630 NENPORT POWDER COATING $180.01 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126631 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 35.94 WATER USE 126632 NEWPORT CIA MEDICAL BLDG 8 $825.46 REFUND USER PEE OVERPAYMENT 126633 NORTH SUPPLY $228.06 COMMUNICATION SUPPLIES 126634 DX SYSTEMS CO 512.648.19 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 ITT 126635 ONE TECH CIRCUITS INC Si54.76 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT X 126636 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $64.71 TRUCK PARTS = 126637 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO $1,954.03 CDU ICALS 126638 ORANGE COURIER 3143.5U COURIER SERVICES 126639 ORANGE VALVE 8 FITTING CO. 1869.78 FITTINGS 12664C OR ITEX CORP $5.745.58 MECHANICAL PARTS 126641 OXYGEN SERVICE S: 802.46 SPECIALTY OASES Cb 126642 COUNTY OF ORANGE $6,293.59 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 126643 CSD OC SELF-FUNDED MEDICAL 1 320U.600.00 PREMIUM ADVANCK 126644 COUNTY OF ORANGE - $2,782.63 PERMIT FEES 126645 PSOCIPOOL SUPPLY OF OCT $177.38 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 126646 PEST 356W.OG SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 126647 PACCD SALES $116.80 PAINT SUPPLIES 126648 PACIFIC PARTS $4.348.28 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 126649 PACIFIC PUBLISHERS 178.00 BOOK 126650 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMLNT CO $789.45 SAFETY SUPPLIES 126651 PACIFIC BELL $12.94 TELEPHONE SERVICES 126652 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C $68.40 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 126653 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPP- $1,246.50 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 126654 PALMIERI, TYLER. WIENER. $10,460.90 LEGAL SERVICES 14-1-IA 126655 PARAGON CABLE $46.78 CABLE SERVICES 126656 PEAT MARWICK MAIN 6 CO 914.600.00 AUDITING SERVICES M.0.3-13-91 126657 PEOO SYSTEMS $1,176.63 HARDWARE 226658 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $5.263.49 LAB SUPPLIES 126659 PHYSIOTRONICS CORP. USA 1491.3E COMPUTER SOFTWARE 12666C PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $111.333.25 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 126661 PITNEY BOWES $226.29 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 126662 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE $56.32 HARDWARE 126663 PLAN HOLD CORP 1612.48 ENGINEERING SUPPLIES 126664 POLYMETRICS, INC. 1490.50 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 126665 FDLYFURE INC 31G.914.47 CATIONIC POLYMER H.O.3-11-92 126666 POWER ELECTRO SUPPLY CO 5871.42 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 126667 PRECISION INDUSTRIES 11.293.84 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 126668 PREMIUM CONNECTING POINT $231.66 OFFICE SUPPLIES I FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/10/92 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/16/92 POSTING DATE 12/16/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126669 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $164.50 ICE 126670 PROCESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY S3.424.95 PUMP PARTS 126671 THE FROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. $4.653.00 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 126672 QUARTET OVONICS $55.25 ELECTRIC PARTS 126673 STEVE P. RADOS, INC. S15.500.60 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-IA-2 126674 RECYC INC $69.172.C2 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 126675 RED WING SHOES S261.18 SAFETY SHOES 22E676 REDI EMPRESS $243.70 MESSENGER SERVICES 126677 THE REGISTER 64.935.45 NOTICES 6 ADS 126678 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $3,214.39 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 126679 RIP VAN WINKLE $1.424.97 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126680 ROOEWAV INN S1.6C7.31 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12EE81 JIM ROY EQUIPMENT S187.16 PUMP 126682 S S J CHEVROLET $477.22 TRUCK PARTS 126683 BPS TECHNOLOGIES $6.987.98 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT m X 126604 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP $3.218.64 PARTS CLEANER Z 126685 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS S147.92 ELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS 126686 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $928.17 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 0A 12607 SANTA BANK $253,935.30 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 2-30 . 126688 DOUG SARVIS 3400.00 CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 1266P9 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT'L S352.466.74 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 W 126690 SEA-BIRO ELECTRONICS INC 61.C65.06 LAB EQUIPMENT 1 126691 SEAGATE SUBSTRATES 918,309:06 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126692 CITY OF SEAL . BEACH 53550 WATER USE 126693 SNURELUCK SALES 52.480.36 MECHANICAL PARTS 126E94 - SIGMA CHEMICAL CO $554.21 LAB SUPPLIES 126695 SMITH PIPE S SUPPLY INC $233.62 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 126696 SOUTH COAST WATER S95.00 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 126697 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO S.b.U42.24 POWER 126698 SO CAL GAS CU 114000.28 NATURAL GAS 126699 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CU S6.606.93 DIESEL/VNLEADED MEL 126700 STAMEN 2 SFASSOFF PL $6,160.00 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 126702 WESTALLOT INC $204.94 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 12E702 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS $650.00 EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION 126703 SUMMIT STEEL $677.95 METAL 126704 SUNCLIPSE INC 513.324.CO REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126705 SUNCLIPSE $3.570.06 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1267G6 TAYLOR-DUNN MFG COMPANY 1183.75 ELECTRIC CART PARTS 126707 TEKDRAULICS $3.434.11 MECMAMICIL REPAIRS 1267CS TEKTRONIX INC $3.392.57 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1267C9 THOMAS BROS PAIS S1.554.43 REFUND USER FEB OVERPAYMENT 126710 TONY-S LOCK 1 SAFE SERVICE $333.D8 KEYS/LOCKS 126711 TRAVEL TRAVEL 31.547.06 TRAVEL SERVICES M.0.6-30-92 126712 NO TRERICE CO $216.37 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 126113 TRUCK 3 AUTO SUPPLY INC $217.62 TRUCK PARTS 126714 06 TUCKER 1 SON INC 442.499.82 SAFETY SUPPLIES r urvu rv///e V11V - JI U141 WUMNINb CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/lU92 PAGE 7 REPORT COUNTY SANITATION ICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY NUMBER AP93 \` CLAIMS PAID I21i POSTING DATE 12/16/92 \\ WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126715 ULTRA SCIENTIFIC $234.00 LAB SUPPLIES 126716 UNION FOODS $579.52 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126717 UNITED PARCEL SLRVICE $577.84 PARCEL SERVICES 226718 UNIVERSAL ALLOY CORP $3,121.41 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126719 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS $125.00 PUBLICATION 126720 VVR SCIENTIFIC $2,954.12 LAB SUPPLIES 126721 VALIN CORPORATION S58L.Ob REGULATOR PARTS 226722 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $2.591.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 126723 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 62.346.23 LAB SUPPLIES 12E724 WASTE WATER DISPOSAL $47,307.98 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126725 WESTCLIFF BUILDING $498.81 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126726 VEST COAST INSTRUMENTS $2.567.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126727 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY S3u.669.75 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 126728 CITY OF WESTMINSTER $540.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING 226729 WHESSOE VAREC S3.436.34 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 126730 WITE6 SCIENTIFIC 4461.10 LAB SUPPLIES 126731 VENTURA SOFTWARE INC. - S649.03 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 126732 GEORGE YARDLEY CO 3795.31 VALVES 126733 YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEMS S286.80 FREIGHT 126734 DON YODER DEVELOPMENT 01 $242.86 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT ----------------- X TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/16/92 $3.585,846.60 Cd tz SUMMARY AMOUNT V 01 OPER FUND $1,575.21 01 CAP FAC FUND $3,625.00 02 OPER FUND $5,009.01 02 CAP FAC FUND $852,830.57 03 OPER FUND $55,175.74 03 CAP FAC FUND $28.84 05 OPEN FUND $1,380.70 05 CAP FAC FUND $2,341.25 06 OPER FUND $345.93 07 OPER FUND $3,199.02 47 CAP FAC FUND $22,180.36 011 OPER FUND $7,626.50 011 CAP PAC FUND $777.96 013 OPEN FUND $104.47 014 OPER FUND $114.16 014 CAP FAC FUND $26,750.58 45&6 OPER FUND $52.42 05&6 CAP FAC FUND $21,510.34 R6&7 OPER FUND $1,972.30 47&14 OPER FUND $12.53 JT OPER FUND $923,566.82 CORF $1,150,363.26 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $200,407.79 JT WORKING CAPITAL $304,305.84 ___________________ $3,585,646.60 . FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/22/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER APR3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/30/92 POSTING DATE 12/3U/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126769 AS TECH COMPANY 1125.13C.19 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.10-9-91 126750 A T 5 T 539531.58 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 126751 A T L T 5150.12 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 126752 . ADVANCED ENGINE TECH CORP $15.232.20 ENGINE PARTS 126753 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC $171.12 AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLIES 126754 AHLRICAN AIR BALANCE CO INC 5869.93 MACHINE REPAIRS 226755 AMERICAN DISTRICT TELEGRAPH 575.OU SERVICE AGREEMENT 126756 AMERICAN SERVICE INDUSTRIES $511.64 MACHINE PARTS 12675T AMICON. INC $615.66 LAB SUPPLIES 126756 ANAMEIM SEWER CONSTRUCTION $28.562.13 EMERGENCY SEVER REPAIRS 126759 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL 52110.0U SERVICE AGREEMENT 126760 ABC LABORATORIES 5.35.1L LAB SERVICES 126761 ABATER SERVICES INC 57.56 UNIFORM JACKETS m 126762 AR120NA INSTRUMENT $67.07 INSTRUMENT PARTS X 126763 ARMOR - VAC $300.00 STREET SNEEPING SERVICES = 126764 ARROWHEAD ELECTRIC CORP $545.76 ELECTRIC PARTS 126765 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. S84.315.09 EMERGENCY SPILL CLEAN-UP M.O. 1-13-93 12676E ASSOCIATED LABORATORIES $115.00 LAB SERVICES —I 126767 ASSOC. AOMINIS. S CONSULTANTS 5270.0L MEDICAL INSURANCE ADMINISTRATOR f". 126768 AREA $75... PUBLICATION 12"" RALPH W ATKINSON S3.b6S.16 PUMP PARTS �. 126711 BKA LA'UP ILL 33.499.26 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.0.10-9-91 126771 BRW SAFETY S SUFPLY 51.253.13 SAFETY SUPPLIES 126772 BANK OF THE VEST S248.343.90 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION J-23-2 12E773 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS 5328.7E PUBLICATIONS 126774 B BATEMAN 5bo D.60 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 126775 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 5190.61 BATTERIES 126776 BAUER COMPRESSOR $261.06 COMPRESSOR PARTS 12677T BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC S2.320.92 LAB SUPPLIES 126778 BID 101. INC S258.64 LAB SUPPLIES 126779 BISHOPS SANITANY RAINY SUP 5263.77 PAINT SUPPLIES 126780 BOEHRINGER MANNNEIN 52.682.35 LAB SUPPLIES 126781 BON-A-RUES $468.86 TRUCK PARTS 126702 BORNEMANN PUNPS. INC $12.463.00 PUMP PARTS 126783 BROWN A CALDWELL CONSULTING $51,697.96 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-I1-1, J-19 126784 BHT BOOKS 1100.49 PUBLICATION 126785 BURKE EN6INEERING CO 5..729.94 ELECTRIC PARTS 12678b BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC $4.316.66 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 126787 GARY G STALED 55.234.11 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 226788 C M 1 $374.23 LAB SUPPLIES 126789 CRC PRESS INC 4,11L.45 LAB SUPPLIES 12679E CS COMPANY 59.629.65 VALVE PARTS 126791 CAL-PAC CHEMICAL CO INC 5200.58 CHEMICALS _ 126792 CAL7ROL INC $1,395.51 INSTRUMENT 226793 CALIFORNIA CIRCUITS ASSOC $385.60 MEMBERSHIP. FEES 226794 CENTURY SAFETY INST 5 SUPP $2.540.35 SAFETY SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/22/92 PAGE . • REP0RT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/30/92 POSTING DATE 12/30/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126795 CHEVRON USA INC $9.744.L9 GASOLINE 126796 CHLOR-SERV.. INC. f223.00 CHLORINATION PARTS 126797 CHURCH ENGINEERING INC $16.305.95 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-R1 126794 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CU $128.34 LAB SUPPLIES 126799 COLTON EQUIPMENT CO f832.49 TRUCK PARTS 126800 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 56.796.7b MECHANICAL PARTS 126001 COMPUSA. INC. fl.]5L u9 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 126862 COMPUSERVE $45.99 COMPUTER SERVICES I26803 CONOENSER A CHILLER SERVICE S3.221.73 ELECTRIC PARTS 126804 CONNELL BM PARTS / DIV f81.55 TRUCK PARTS 126805 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $2,571.22 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 126806 CONTINENTAL ALE TOOLS INC $710.18 TOOLS/HARDWARE 126807 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $1.61b.25 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 7T7 126008 CONTROL DESIGN SUPPLY 187.02 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES X 226809 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC 46,588.54 GENERATOR PARTS = 126810 COUNCIL ON EDUCATION 3495..0 TRAINING REGISTRATION by 126011 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC f863.5V ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 226612 CHARLES P CROWLEY CO S1.S20.43 PUMP PARTS 126813 CRYSTAL CLEAR WINDOW MAINT. S2.250.U6 WINDOW CLEANING f"1 126814 SYKCD/AFRS FEES 910,000.00 ANNUAL FEES 126815 J.Y. D'ANGELO CO INC 52,647.25 VALVE N 126616 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $960.44 TIRES 126817 DEZURIK AND/OR CS CO $1,355.19 VALVE 126018 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 63.793.36 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-12-92 126819 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $304.93 PRINTING 126826 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP f7.44b.99 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE 126821 EIMCO PROCESS EQUIP CO f3.146.34 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 126822 EMA SERVICES INC f1.5W3.49 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2 126823 EASTMAN INC 33,306.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 126824 ENCHANTER INC $4,480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 126825 Ell $439.27 INSTRUMENT 126026 MARSHALL FAIRRES $128.68 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 126927 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 57.540...0 RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.O.30-9-91 126828 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN PE 13.4UG.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-22-2, 1-16 126829 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP SIb6.75 AIR FREIGHT 226030 FILTER SUPPLY CO '553.24 FILTERS 126631 FISCHER S PORTER CO f5.060.45 CHLORINATION PARTS 126832 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO sb6W.40 LAB SUPPLIES 126033 FLU-SYSTEMS S4'.14.75 PUMP PARTS 126834 FORMA SCIENTIFIC, INC. 5496.5E LAB SUPPLIES 126635 CLIFFORD A FURMERI f8.460.75 SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 126836 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT $39.08 PAINT SUPPLIES 126837 FOX ENTERPRISLS S1025.00 SAFETY CONSULTANT 126838 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES 5223.i6 TRUCK PARTS 126839 THC FOXBORO CO $3.146.07 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126640 FRAZEE PAINT 6 VALLCOVERING f:.9.3b PAINT SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/22/92 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAIO 12/30/92 POSTING, DATE 12/30/92 ' WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126841 BUD FREY $21.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 126842 GET, INC. 61.111.80 COMPUTER SOFTWARB/HARDWARE 126843 GANAML LUMBER CO SIL6.83 LUMBER 126844 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 52.316.56 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 126645 GENERAL OCEANICS. INC. 1269.10 LAB SUPPLIES 126846 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $3.375.74 TELEPHONE SERVICES 126847 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC 515.374.18 MECHANICAL PARTS 126898 YY GRAINGER INC S93.GI TRUCK PARTS 126849 GREAT PACIFIC EQUIPMENT CO. $103.63 TRUCK PARTS 126850 GROIN EQUIPMENT CORP S1.895.00 VALVES 126651 HSQ TECHNOLOGY 1859.296.06 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2 126852 NO TYPE 6 4RAPHICS 6168.75 PRINTING 126853 HARBOUR. ENGINEERING $4.659.25 PUMP PARTS X 126854 FRED A HARPER S1.560.4u DEFERRED COMP P DISTRIBUTION 126855 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTI $259.79 LM 2 126856 HAULAYAY CONTAINERS $2.760.06 CONTAINER RENTAL 126857 FL HAWII CO INC $3,174.32 FILTERS 126B5tl HEYLETT P4CKAR0 $39 B.ES LAB SUPPLIES 126tl 59 HILIT iNC 6312.2E BATTERIES 12686D HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC 12.334.2b C0MPRESS0R PARTS 07 126861 HOKE CONTROLS DIV/WOKE. INC. $236.04 VALVES 126862 J.T. HORVATH 6 ASSOC. 92.508.86 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1 W 126863 HOUSE OF BATTERIES 533.04 BATTERIES 126864 RS NUGHES CO INC 9159.12 PAINT SUPPLIES 126865 HUNTER CORPORATION $244.340.00 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 126866 HUN71MG70N BEACH RUBBER STA $13.GS OFFICE SUPPLIES 226667 HUNTINGTON HONDA 5124.16 LAB SUPPLIES 126868 HUNTINGTON VALLEY TOOL 160.54 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 126869 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C $114.13 BICYCLE PARTS 126870 I.G. INDUSTRIAL CORP. 3b96.39 CHEMICALS 126871 ISCO INC $1,659.35 SAFETY SUPPLIES 126872 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 592.015.92 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-10-92 126873 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS 6bi3.41 COITNECTORS 126874 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $29.42 TRUCK PARTS 126875 INSIDE E.P.P. SS95..L SUBSCRIPTION 12ES76 INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE 3175.04 PUBLICATION 126077 INTEGRATED BUSINESS INT. INC 51.54G.6L OFFICE FURNITURE 126876 INTERNATIONAL SENSOR TECH 1933..E INSTRUMENT PARTS 126879 JLA CREDIT CORP $145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 126800 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 5926.19 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 22EBB1 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO $220.93 METERS 126882 JONES CHEMICALS INC 56.112.15 CHEMICALS 126883 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE C 5369.34 TOOLS 126684 KNOK INDUSTRIAL SUFPLILS 53.481.16 TOOLS 126685 MARTIN KORUICK SR $3.166.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 126886 THE LAST AORD s4IS.J6 TRAINING REGISTRATION FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL _ PH 0CLSSING DATE 12/22/92 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/30/92 POSTING DATE 12/30/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT - DESCRIPTION 126887 LAYMAN. JONES A DYE. LAWYERS 512.397.17 LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER INDUSTRIES 126888 LEGI-TECH 931 U.UO COMPUTER SERVICES 126889 LECO CORPORATION 51.062.36 LAB SUPPLIES 126890 MP LINDSTROM INC $7,980.00 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 226891 LITTLER, MENDELSON. FASTIFF t $65.U. TRAINING REGISTRATION 126892 SOCO-LYNCH CORP s792.16 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 126893 MANTEK 5,13.29 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 126894 MEASUREMENT CONTROL SYS INC 6327.38 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126895 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO $228.98 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126096 METALLURGICAL MATERIALS ASSOC 53.9W0.00 LAB SERVICES 126897 MICROAGE OF CERRITOS $42.71 - COMPUTER SOFTWARE 126898 MICROBIC$ CORPORATION Sb23.54 LAB SUPPLIES 126899 MIDLAND MFG CORP $794.23 CHLORINATION PARTS 126900 MIDWAY MFG S MACHINING $23.726.55 MECHANICAL PARTS rn 126901 M17CHELL INSTRUMENT CO 5895.L0 ELECTRIC PARTS X 126962 MODICON, INC 4359.06 CABLE = 126903 MONTGOMERY BROTHERS INC $1.207.73 LAB SUPPLIES 1269C4 MOTION INDUSTRIES INC SAY3.15 MECHANICAL PARTS 126905, NEAL SUPPLY CO 4469.14 METAL —I 126906 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $215.36 TRUCK PARTS n 126967 ORANGE COUNTY CHEMICAL CO 6789.34 CRSMICALS 126908 ORANGE VALVE G FITTING CO. 5115.01 FITTINGS F 126909 DHITEX CORP 5918.55 MACHINE PARTS 126910 OXYGEN SERVICE SE86.62 SPECIALTY GASES 126911 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 523.355.2L WORKERS COMP REIMBURSEMENT 126912 PACIFIC PARTS S4.478.28 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126913 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $6,396.27 SAFETY SUPPLIES 126914 PACIFIC BELL Sb64.76 TELEPHONE SERVICES 126915 PADRE JANITORIAL SUPP $1.169.01 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 126916 PALMIERI. TYLER. WIENER. 52.386.1L LEGAL SERVICES - BAKER/GISLER COWDEN. 126917 ROY PEBDERGRAFT S460.40 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 126910 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS INC S1G9.00.43 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.5-8-91 126919 POLYFURE INC 515.080.32 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 126920 POWER TRACK INC $248.43 HARDWARE 126921 PRECISION INDUSTRIES 52.058.04 ELECTRIC PARTS 126922 PRESENTATION PRODUCTS 396.1, OFFICE SUPPLIES 126923 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE IND. 517.635.74 SOIL TESTING 126924 BMS INC 31.755.20 PRINTING SUPPLIES 126925 QUALITY REFRIGERATION $300.51 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 126926 RJN COMPUTER SERVICES INC 5145.646.10 - COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE M.0.8-12-92 126927 RMB ENGINEERING/MILLTRONICS $2,203.51 METER 126928 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS 41.Bab.63 PUMP REPAIR 126929 RAINBOW DISPOSAL CO 51.430.09 TRASH REMOVAL 126930 RECVC INC $39,505.65 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 126931 REISH MARINE STUDIES. INC $6E0.0U LAB SERVICES 126932 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $7.729.3T PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1 FUND ND 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/22/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/34/92 POSTING DATE 12/34/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126933 RESTEK CORP 1283.87 LAB SUPPLIES 126934 PEGGY RUPP 1540.40 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 126935 RYAN-HERCO S1.107.44 METER 226936 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $831.78 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 126937 DOUG SARVIS 375O.OD CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 226938 SEA-61RD ELECTRONICS INC $2,229.05 LAB SUPPLIES 226939 SHURELUCK SALES $1.53T.43 HARDWARE 126940 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO 148.63 LAB SUPPLIES 226941 SOFTWARE PUBLISHING CORP 1100.90 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 226942 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $325.60 PERMIT FEES 126943 SCAUMD UPDATE TRAINING 31.030.14 PUBLICATION 12694♦ SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $412.490.06 POWER 126945 $0 CAL GAS CO ST91.45 - NATURAL GAS X 126946 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC $191.72 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 2 126947 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO 1534.9b TOOLS 12E948 JAMES STANFILL CONSTRUCTION $1.300.4D CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 126949 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS 3650.00 LAB EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION -� 126950 SUFELCU INC $b3.64 LAB SUPPLIES 126951 SUPER CHEM CORP S414.62 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES n 126952 TEKTRONIX INC $854.44 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 126953 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL S187.Z4 INSTRUMENT PARTS 126955 TMOMFSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 12$136.65 MECHANICAL PARTS 126956 TRAVEL LOCK 3 SAFE SERVICE ,255.06 LOGE RE-KEYING CE 326956 TRAVEL TRAVEL $3.255.44 TRAVEL SERVICES M.O.6-30-92 126957 TRUCK 3 AUTO SUPPLY INC 3138.18 TRUCK PARTS 126950 TRUCO, INC 3315.49 LAB SUPPLIES 126959 JG TUCKER i SON INC 13.S22.Z3 BLOWER PARTS 126960 CITY OF TUSTIN 43,580.00 MANHOLE ADJUSTING 126961 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1269.88 PARCEL SERVICES 126962 VWR SCIENTIFIC 46.419.85 LAB SUPPLIES 126963 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO $548.18 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 126964 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $121.3. LAB SUPPLIES 226965 VERTEX SYSTEMS 17.:92.54 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 126966 WEST NEWPORT OIL CO 362.627.54 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 126967 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS IN $185.12 SAFETY SIGNS 126966 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPPLY 47.246.JJ CAUSTIC SODA M.0.8-12-92 126969 WITEG SCIENTIFIC 1441.76 LAB SUPPLIES 126910 WON-DOOR 3191.UU BUILDING REPAIRS 126971 ROURKE A WOOURUFF i OR 169.84U.b2 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 126972 GEORGE YARDLEY CO 41.324.92 VALVES 126973 ZIEBARTH 3 ALPEP/C.S. ALPER 3263,836.00 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 126974 ZIEBARTH AND ALFER S11a14.44 CONSTRUCTION P2-41-3 126975 RICHARD B EDGAR 32UD.U0 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 12/39/92 13,258,634.70 I- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIET WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 12/22/92 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 12/30/92 POSTING DATE 12/30/92 SUMMARY AMOUNT 01 CAP PAC FUND $340.00 42 OPEN FUND $752.80 k2 CAP PAC FUND 432,680.0E 43 OPEN FUND $10,440.80 R3 CAP PAC FUND $1,264.84 45 OPER FUND $3,597.70 47 OPEN FORD $8,463.57 47 CAP FAC FUND _ $3,256.00 411 OPEN FUND $635.00 414 CAP PAC FUND $6,990.11 ' m 456E OPEN FUND $3,159.50 X 456E CAP FAC FUND $1,060.00 S 4687 CAP FAC FUND $31.10 87614 OPEN FUND $5,126.85 JT OPER FUND $958,320.41 CORP $1,948,301.24 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $46,760.09 �1 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $227,653.81 81 -------------- $3,258,834.70 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 & 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING January 20, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of January 13, 1993, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 7 of Orange County, California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Assistant Secretary reported a quorum present. DISTRICT 3: DIRECTORS PRESENT: Burnie Dunlap, Chairman pro tem, John Collins, James V. Evans, James H. Flora, Don R. Griffin, Gail Kerry, Frank Laszlo, Eva G. Miner, Earle Robitaille, Sheldon S. Singer, Roger R. Stanton, Charles E. Sylvia DIRECTORS ABSENT: A.B. "Buck" Catlin, Thomas E. Lutz, Iry Pickier, Sal A. Sapien DISTRICT 7: DIRECTORS PRESENT: Fred Barrera, Barry Hammond, Ted Moreno, Don Roth DIRECTORS ABSENT: Charles E. Puckett, Phil Sansone, James A. Wahner STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Penny Kyle, Assitant Board Secretary, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, John Dettle OTHERS PRESENT: Joint Chairman William Mahoney, Vice Joint Chairman Evelyn Hart, Director Carrey J. Nelson, Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, John Shaw, Phil Stone i 01/20/93 Districts 3 & 7 DISTRICTS 3 & 7 Report of staff and counsel re fiberalass pipe force mains The Director of Engineering reported on the history of the Districts' use of Techite pipe as an alternative material for force main construction. Techite pipe was made from fiberglass layers bonded together with glue. He also reported that in the past three years, the Districts have experienced failures in some of the Techite pipe force mains installed in District No. 3. Other pipe has been installed in Districts Nos. 5 and 7 and as a liner in an interplant line. He also explained that the western portion of District No. 3 drains to a collection system served by the Seal Beach Pump Station located on the northeast corner of Seal Beach Boulevard and Westminster Avenue. Wastewater from this system is pumped easterly through a dual force main system to a gravity sewer located half- way between Bolsa Chica Avenue and Springdale Avenue. Both force mains are made of 30-inch diameter Techite pipes. The first of these mains, the Westminster Avenue Force Main, First Unit, Contract No. 3-13; was installed in 1970, the Second Unit, Contract No. 3-13-1, in 1978. Mr. Dawes stated that the most recent of several breaks in these lines occurred on August 19, 1991 . The same line previously broke a few hundred feet away in March 1990 necessitating repairs at that time. The Director of Engineering noted that while replacing the most heavily damaged 20-foot portion of the pipe from the August 1991 break, staff was able to view adjacent pipe sections on both sides of the broken pipe and found them cracked as well. Staff reported to the Directors at the September 11, 1991 Board meeting that the entire line would possibly need to be replaced. Staff estimated the cost to be approximately $5 to $6 million to replace both pipes. The Board authorized staff to solicit proposals and negotiate a professional services agreement for design of Replacement of the Westminster Avenue Force Main (First Unit), Contract No. 3-36. Design for the Second Unit would follow the construction of the First Unit as a second phase via a separate contract. He noted that staff reported to the Directors in December 1991 that information had been obtained indicating that the break may have been due to Techite pipe being inherently defective. Staff and General Counsel have had a number of discussions with David Griffin, a Bakersfield lawyer specializing in pipe technology. Mr. Griffin has represented public agencies with similar Techite pipe problems. He has recovered several large judgments and settlements against the Techite pipe manufacturers for defective material. -2- 01/20/93 Districts 3 & 7 At that time General Counsel and staff recommended, and the Boards concurred, `..� retaining Mr. Griffin within staff authority to review the potential of recovering costs from the manufacturers of Techite pipe. It was further noted that based on potential results of the recommended testing and Mr. Griffin's findings, claims for fraud, breach of contract, negligence and misrepresentation are a distinct possibility, with recoveries for the cost of replacing the Districts' force mains plus legal fees minus depreciation expected. Punitive damages have also been obtained in past cases. Mr. Griffin has advised the Districts of some of the past histories of the Techite pipe manufacturers and the basis for a claim against the Techite pipe manufacturers. Mr. Griffin has indicated that the chances of recovery are good, and recommends proceeding with further testing. Testing of the pipe requires taking pipe samples for laboratory analysis. Mr. Griffin advises that the main items of evidence for this, or any such case, are the samples of the pipe analyzed by a laboratory proving that the pipe is deteriorating at an accelerated pace. The Districts videotaped 1300 feet of the newer Westminster Avenue Force Main, Contract No. 3-13-1 , to determine if taking a sample was justified. The Directors viewed portions of that videotape which showed a radial crack consistent with past Techite pipe failures. Videotaping lengths exceeding 1300 feet would require the Districts to cut access openings in the force mains at 2600 foot intervals. Mr. Dawes also stated that staff has prepared plans for the removal of a segment of pipe from each of the Westminster Force Mains, First and Second Units, with one segment selected which will allow the repair of the cracked `...� pipe that has been discovered on the Second Unit, concurrently with it's use for laboratory analysis. The First Unit has had two recent failures in 1990 and 1991 . Mr. Dawes further reported that Techite pipe was used in District No. 7 at the Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main, and the College Avenue Pump Station and Force Main. No failures have happened on these systems. In July 1992, the Directors authorized construction of a gravity line to the Irvine Ranch Water District's Harvard Avenue Trunk in lieu of constructing a new force main for the Navy Way Pump Station force main. Plans are now being prepared for the abandonment of the Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main and most of the flows to the College Avenue Pump Station are being diverted to the Sunflower Trunk Sewer, greatly reducing the operating pressures in this line. Samples will be taken of the Navy Way Force Main as part of the Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main Abandonment and Construction of Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20. Since the analysis for District No. 3 will precede District No. 7, no actions were being recommended at this time for District No. 7. -3- 01/20/93 Districts 3 & 7 Mr. Dawes concluded that due to the fact that these samples will be used as evidence in a claim, staff recommends the removal of the pipes and selection of segments for laboratory analysis be supervised and documented by a third party with experience in removing the fragile sections of pipe. Mr. Arnold Rummelsburg Is an experienced consultant with the knowledge necessary to supervise and provide forensic documentation of the removal. Corroborating laboratory analyses will also be required from two labs. Also, staff and General Counsel are recommending that Mr. Griffin's authorization be increased from the staff- authorized $25,000.00 to $85,000.00 to cover consultation, compilation of past discovery and testimony, and preparation of a settlement brief. In addition, a contractor will have to be engaged to repair the cracked section(s) of pipe. DISTRICT 3 Actions to evaluation and determination of condition of Techite pipe force mains and viability of claim against oioe manufacturer Authorizing Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 54292 Issued to David R. Griffin. Attorney at Law re Techite Pit)e Moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order No. 54292 issued to David R. Griffin, Attorney at Law, and/or his firm Byrum, Holland & Griffin, increasing the authorized amount from an amount not to exceed $25,000.00 to an amount not to exceed $85,000.00, for services pertaining to evaluation and determination of condition of Techite pipe force mains and viability of claim against pipe manufacturer. Authorizino the General Manager to Issue a purchase order to Arnold Rummelsburg to provide supervision and forensic documentation re Techite Pipe Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to issue a purchase order to Arnold Rummelsburg to provide supervision and forensic documentation in an amount not to exceed $5,000.00, for services pertaining to evaluation and determination of condition of Techite pipe force mains and viability of claim against pipe manufacturer. -4- 01/20/93 Districts 3 & 7 Authorizing the General Manager to issue purchase orders to Houser Labs and Derrick Hull re Techite pipe Moved, seconded and duly carried that the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to issue the following purchase orders to conduct laboratory analyses for services pertaining to evaluation and determination of condition of Techite pipe force mains and viability of claim against pipe manufacturer, in a total amount not to exceed $35,000.00 for the two firms: . Houser Labs - Boulder, Colorado . Derrick Hull, Consultant - Cambridge, England Authorizing receipt of bids from qualified contractors for Repair and Sampling of Westminster Avenue Force Main. Units 1 and 2. Contract No. 3-36, and award contract to lowest responsible bidder Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to receive bids from qualified contractors for Repair and Sampling of Westminster Avenue Force Main, Units 1 and 2, Contract No. 3-36; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to award contract to the lowest responsible bidder, in an amount not to exceed $125,000.00. DISTRICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m., January 20, 1993. -5- 01/20/93 Districts 3 & 7 DISTRICT 7 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:20 p.m., January 20, 1993. u iO Assistant S etary oard of Directors County Sanitation Cristricts Nos. 3 & 7 of Orange County, California -6- BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127. 10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 9272"127 Telephone: (714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA FEBRUARY 10, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 Minute excerpts have been received as set forth below. Pursuant to Regular Agenda Item No. 4, it is appropriate to receive and file said excerpts: (4) (a) DISTRICTS 5. 6 & 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts from the following re election of mayor and appointment of alternate Directors, as follows: ('Mayor) Ci y/Anencv District Active Director Alternate Director Costa Mesa 7 James A. Wahner Mike Scheafer Sanitary Dist. Newport Beach 5 John C. Cox, Jr. Jan Debay Phil Sansone Jan Debay 6 Evelyn Hart John C. Cox, Jr. 7 Jan Debay Phil Sansone (ADDITIONAL ITEMS LISTED ON PAGE 2) SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA ITEMS The following items are hereby submitted to the Boards of Directors for discussion and action at the regular meeting date and time set forth above. r. The need to take the recommended action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted on February 4, 1993. In order for action to be taken on this item, the Boards of Directors shall first determine by a two-thirds vote of the Board members, or if less than two- thirds of the members are present, a unanimous vote of those members present, that the need to take this action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. If the Supplemental Agenda includes items for the Joint boards and/or one or more individual District Boards, each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. (27) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing consideration of items (27)(b) and (c) listed below which arose subsequent to the posting of the agenda and which requires action at this time pursuant to authority of Government Code Section 54954.2(b)(2). (b) Verbal report of General Counsel (c) Consideration of motion to receive, file and deny Application for Leave to Present Late Claim of Loyd T. Nitzen, II dated January 18, 1993 in an undetermined amount for alleged personal injuries and general damages incurred in connection with a vehicle accident in the vicinity where Districts' equipment and routine maintenance was being performed in the City of Tustin, and refer to the District's General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. -2- REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN ... 2/10/93 1) PRESENTATION OF PLAQUES AND RESOLUTIONS TO RETIRING DIRECTORS AS YOU KNOW, SEVERAL OF OUR DIRECTORS RECENTLY RETIRED FROM THE BOARDS AND WE WOULD LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THEIR EFFORTS ON BEHALF OF THE DISTRICTS' WITH THE PRESENTATION OF A PLAQUE AND A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE BOARDS' APPRECIATION FOR THEIR OUTSTANDING SERVICE. OVER THE YEARS, THESE DIRECTORS HAVE NOT ONLY PERFORMED THEIR DUTIES AS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS WITH A HIGH DEGREE OF PROFESSIONALISM AND DEDICATION, BUT THEY HAVE ALSO BEEN EQUALLY INVOLVED IN THE WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OF THE SANITATION DISTRICTS. DIRECTOR'S NAME CITY DISTRICT(S) BARRY DENES VILLA PARK 2 PAT MCGUIGAN SANTA ANA 3 RICHA_RD PARTIN CYPRESS 3 SALLY ANNE SHERIDAN IRVINE 14• *PLAQUE AND RESOLUTIONS WERE HAND - DELIVERED BY DIRECTOR HAMMOND �..../ -ITEM 2 ON NEXT PAGE- 2) PRESENTATION OF DISTRICTS' PIN(S) TO NEW DIRECTOR(S) PRESENT PIN(S) TO THE FOLLOWING NEW DIRECTOR(S) REPLACING DIRECTOR(S) THAT RETIRED LAST MONTH: NAME CITY/AGENCY DISTRICT JAN DEBAY NEWPORT BEACH 7 (THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT SOME NEWLY-APPOINTED DIRECTORS MAY SHOW UP TONIGHT THAT WE HAVE NOT BEEN ADVISED OF.) -ITEM 3 ON NEXT PAGE- V� 3) NEW DIRECTORS ORIENTATION AND PLANT TOUR ..d COMMENT ON NEW DIRECTORS ORIENTATION AND TREATMENT PLANT TOUR ON SATURDAY, JANUARY 30TH. 9 DIRECTORS ATTENDED (4 NEW). 4) BOARD COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS COMMENT ON BOARD COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS. -ITEM 5 ON NEXT PAGE- 5) UPCOMING MEETINGS A. FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 17TH AT 530 P.M. B. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE - THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON WEDNESDAY. FEBRUARY 24TH AT 5:30 P.M. INVITE TWO OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTORS TO ATTEND: BURNIE DUNLAP AND JAMES FERRYMAN OR JAMES FLORA OR BARRY HAMMOND C. CONSERVATION. RECYCLE & REUSE COMMITTEE - THE CONSERVATION, RECYCLE & REUSE COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THURSDAY. FEBRUARY 25TH AT 5:30 P.M. D. JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE - (JOINT CHAIRMAN AND VICE JOINT CHAIRMAN ONLY) - THE JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON TUESDAY, MARCH STH AT 12:00 P.M. -END OF REPORT- MEETING DATE February 10, 1993 TIME 7t30 P.M. DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6,7,11.13 & 14 RML I JOINT BOARDS (LU12) .........18a11S�SSR ... _L (BEYERI ........... mem) .......BARRERA ...... J/ (DENEs) ...........BELL ......... — (flEADE) .......FERRYMAN..... JL _ 0ftCLANAHAN) ......"TUN ....... — (PONTI000) ....SALTAREW .... e (SCO1T) ...........COLLINS — FROTH) ........STANTON ...... —_ (DEBAY) ...........Cox ......... — DISTRICT 3 (SANSONE) .........DESAY ....... — (NELSON) ..........'UN'. .:::::: UNLAP ...... _— (GULIIXSON)....WEDM Ni::::::: (RICE) ............. VANS ....... -- (SCOTT) .......COW S ....... -- (READF) ...........FERRYMAN.... (BEYER) .......BARREM ...... (MAHCNEY).........FLORA roFWEb7 ... ..SELL .......... (BROWN)...........GRRR?j ...... (MACUNARAN)..CATLIN ........ (WEDM) ...........GUWXBON ... —_ (FLORA) .......MAIK)NEY...... (WARD) ............RAMMDND .... (PARKER)..)...MOflENO,MAPoA (COX) .............MMr,....... �' _ (PARKER) ......NELSON ....... (TOE) ..........NERRY .......� .(DALY).........PICKIER....... (FORSYTHE) ........LADTLO.......y/ — (Lm .........PUUDO........ (BOTH) ........ (SINGER).......2U111ET........ (FLORA) ........... NEAT ..... DISTRICT 3 ........MINER........ __ — (ECNENRODE)....... MORENO,MARIA _ (MARTINU).....6APIEN ........ 'LIDO) ...........MORENO.TED . (NELSON) ......DUNIAP ....... (PARKER) ..........NELSON ......JL —_ (M LANAHAN) ..CATUN ........ (OUNLAP) ..........PARKER ...... _ (SCOTT) .......COWNS....... (DALY).............PICKER...... — (ME) .........EVANB (PUCKETT) .........RSTIIIOW.... _ (MANONEY).....FLDRA (6ALTARELLI) .......PUCID:Tf ..... (BROWN).......GRIFFlN ....... (LUTZ) .............PUUDO....... (AGE) .........NERRY ........ -- ILUTA .............RIMW WMi — (FORSYTHE) ....LA6TLO........ -- (STANTON) .........MTN ........ — (RICHARDSON) ..LUTZ .......... (PONTIOUS) ........SALTARELU ... (UNN) .........WNER......... ID My) ...........SANSONE .(Day).........PICNLER ....... (MARTINEZ).........WIEN ....... MOSRAILLE) ...SILVA ......... (ROBRAILLE) .......SILVA ........ (IlAITn.......SINGER........ I7lAKEH...........SINGER.......7 _— (BOTH) ........STANTON ...... (ROTH) ............STANTON ..... — (RATES)........SYVM ........ (KILLER) ...........SWAN ........ IMTES)............SYVU ....... _ DISTRICT S (PERRYBCHEAF ) .. — (OERAY) .......COX (GUWXSON)........WEOAA ....... (STANTON) .....ROTH ......... (ROSITAILE) ....... WINCHED- .... (DEBAY) .......SANSONE ...... (SINGER)...........IIAKET....... DISTRICTS STAFF OTHERS (PERRY) .......WARNER....... SYLVESTER _A_ WOODRUFF (COX) .........HARE........ . BROWN .... , ANWAR .... — (STANTON) .....ROTH ......... JG ANDER6 . _A� DEMR..... CLAWSON.. ✓ FLEMNG... DISTRICT 7 DAWES .... HOHENER.. — (BALTAREW) ...PUCKETT ...... ✓ G0RC2YCA. Ho UGH.... (SCHEAFER) ....WARNER....... � HASENSTAB _JF HOWARD .. (BEYER) .......BARRERA ...... -10'r HOMES ... y HUM ..... (SANSONE) .....DEMY ........ A/ KYLE ...... _✓ KNOPF .... JC (WARD) ........HAMMDND ..... —_ UNDER .... , LEE ....... �✓ (PUUM) .......MoRENO,no .. - NELLOR ... UNDS OM (STANTON) .....ROTH ......... NN Hots ... JG LYNCH .... OOTEN .... SHAW ... DISTRICT 11 SIMPSON (ROBRAILLE) ...WINCHELL ..... ✓ STREED ... YOUNG .... VINCENT (SILVA) ........LEIPZIG........ _ INSOR WINSOR ...(ROTH) ........STANTON ...... ae DISTRICT 13 (M ) .......BLTWXSO ..... _ (DEYER)YER) .......BARBER) ...... (DUNE).) ......PARKER ....... JL (STAYTON) .....PIoxLROTH fl.......(STANTON) .....ROTH ......... DISTRICT 14 (KILLER) .......SWAN ......... ✓ — �/ (PUCKETT) .....TNNIIMNB ..... .w (BEYER) .......BALM ...... JG — (WARD) ........HAM OND ..... JC — (STANTON) .....ROTE ......... �e v1 W89 02/10/93 - JOINT BOARD MEETING #6 Is) - JOINT CHAIRMAN'S REPORT This evening we have a presentation of some plaques and resolutions to retiring Directors. As you know, several of our Directors recently retired from the Boards and we would like to acknowledge their efforts on behalf of the Districts with the presentation of a plaque and a resolution expressing the Boards' appreciation for their outstanding service. Over the years the Directors have not only performed their duties as city council members with a high degree of professionalism and dedication but they have also been equally involved in the wastewater management program of the Sanitation Districts of Orange County. At this time I would like to have Pat McGuigan come forward. (Presented plaque and resolution). MC GUIGAN: Thanked staff for all of their help. Joint Chairman then asked Richard Partin to come forward. (Presented plaque and resolution). PARTIN: Commented that it was a pleasure to serve on this Board. Things get �./ accomplished here, unlike city business. Joint Chairman stated that through Directors like these two we have recognized this evening who have been here in the past who have really made a good part of what we are here today. There have been many before us that have continued or began what we are continuing. I want to again thank each of you for your contributions. He then requested Jan Debay to come forward. She'll be representing District 7 for Newport Beach. He then presented her with a pin with the Districts' logo. For those Directors unable to attend the new Directors' Orientation on January 30th, we had 9 Directors that came out, 4 of which were new. For those of you that weren't able to come, you really missed a good time, I think, in being able to go through the facility and learn a little bit about what we are all about here. We'll try as best we can to have another one so that those that were not able to come will be able to do so. I know it's always difficult to hit a day that everybody can make but I think it really is important for you to go through the facilities and what staff go through the dog-and-pony show. Committee assignments have been made. You will be getting notice of all of those in the mail. They are being put together now and probably be mailed out if not this -1- �..i week, then next week to all of you so you'll know what committee you are on. There is a committee called Stringfellow. If you are interested, it really isn't as bad as it sounds. Some of us have been on Stringfellow and served in the past, but if you would like to find out more about it and see if you are interested in serving either see Wayne or myself and we'll be happy to talk to you. We do have the right to appoint a member to sit on that Board. As a matter of fact they discharge into our facilities so it is not something that I guess we should take lightly, and that we probably should be playing a part in this thing. If you have any interest, see one of us if you will. We'll be happy to discuss. Fiscal Policy Committee will be meeting on Wednesday, 2/17/93 at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee will be meeting on Wednesday, 2/24/93 at 5:30 p.m., and I would like to invite Burnie Dunlap and Jim Ferryman. Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee is scheduled for Thursday, 2/25/93 at 5:30 p.m. There is a Joint Works Selection Committee that has been set for March 9th at 12:00 p.m. A'BIb1 - GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT To follow up on JC's comments about New Directors' Orientation and Tour. All of the new Directors and those Directors that attended the January 30th tour got a copy of an updated version of the Directors' Information book. All of you should have one of these. If you would like a copy of the updated version, if you'll see one of the clerks at the Board Secretary's table before you leave they have a supply there. Also, I would like to add for those of you who weren't able to attend, particularly the new directors, if it is more convenient for you to come in a time that you name it, I will make myself and staff available to give you a briefing and a plant tour. If you would like to do that, just give me a call and we can arrange that. #BIc1 - GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT I have nothing other than to note that Item No. 27 has been added on the Supplemental Agenda for District No. 7. It is not a significant item. It's a small claim but we do have to address it. And there is going to be a closed session related to the engines. #12lb1131 - Wastewater Quality Treatment and Diversion Study -2- DIRECTOR COLLINS: There is no in Stringfellow flow that is going to Plant 2 be redirected to Plant 1. JWS: Yes, I would ask the Director of Engineering to comment on that issue and make a general comment on the Intent of this report. TMD: This report was a report to study various alternatives for improving water quality in the wastewater treated at this plant. And by water quality I am talking about the dissolved minerals so you can think about the salt content of the water. At the present time we are not treating the Santa Ana River Interceptor which is the largest sewer interceptor tributary to this plant. We are diverting that flow to treatment plant 2. The Santa Ana River interceptor does carry the Stringfellow treated wastewater. One of the thoughts in this report was to continue a permanent diversion of that line. Hence that line picks up a lot of brine. Now this brine comes from groundwater rehabilitation projects in the upper base area and in the Corona area as well as within Orange County. It is the saltiest of the water we receive at this plant. As we continue to divert that, the report shows, we would have to bring in other water to this plant which would require construction of a pump station to divert water now tributary to plant no. 2 to this plant so we would have to swap flows. And it quantifies that amount. The reason we would swap the flow is once again to solely provide a better water to the Orange County Water District for their reclamation project. They don't know If they want to do that as they would be asked to pay the lion's share of the charges. They are going to study this a little bit further now that they have that information. But if we do not make that swap, eventually we would have to treat the Stringfellow, which is part of the SARI line, at this plant. The Master Plan calls for building these sites out in equal size and sooner or later we'll have to start doing that. Especially once we bring on more secondary here we would need that water to be treated here. Right now there are no plans to switch but it is something you should be aware of in the future. COLLINS: My concern is not included in this report. I would sincerely hope if it is included that in the future there would be given full before this. SWAN: I would like to point out that the Stringfellow water is being introduced into the system has been treated to almost up to drinking water quality. And, in fact, former Director Edgar drank a glass of the water in front of a number of . As far as the quality of the water coming from that plant seems to be better than some of the water coming out of other parts more industrialized and that is really some of the best water you've got. It has a terrible name on it but as far as the water quality, it's a heck of a lot better than we're getting out of some of the treatment plants in Orange County. STANTON: Since you brought up old wounds, Peer, I was the only person on this -3- board who voted against it. We were told over and over it would only be for three years and we have doubled into the time COLLINS: It is not my intention to open up old wounds. But I just want to make sure that we will be advised of this in the future. #13 - Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) _ TMD: This project is the expansion of our Operations and Control Center at the Huntington Beach treatment plant. It is approximately doubling its size providing office space which is now out in our lunch room down there. It rehabilitates our employees' restrooms, showers and lockers. It is interesting to note that one of the things that we have to do is change the mix of the lockers for our employees to provide far more facilities for our female employees at Plant No. 2 which now make up a good share of our employees. Besides that it Includes the construction of an electric charging area and garage for the golf carts that literally all our employees use these electric carts. This has been bid three times. The first two we had protests over and we have a protest once again. The 4th bidder of 12 that we received is protesting the bottom three in that they did not list all of the contractor license numbers on the subcontractors. That is not a state requirement that they do so. It is our own and you have it within your authority to waive that requirement. The actions tonight are to approve Addendum No. 5 which makes miscellaneous clarifications and added a provision to our standard provisions to reject the protest from Culp Construction Company and to make the award. We did receive 12 bids ranging from a low of $2.28 million to a high of $2.7 million. All 12 bids were under our engineer's estimate of $2.8 million. The recommended action from staff is to approve the award and other actions. #14 - Job No. J-28 (Rebid) TMD: This is the second bid for this one. The first bid had to be rejected because of a software license problem. We did rebid the project and received 12 bids ranging from $312,000 by Soffa Electric to $605,000. There was a protest by the second bidder claiming the first bidder bid too low but he withdrew that protest. Our recommendations are to approve the Addendum No. 1 and to award to the low bidder, Soffa Electric, Inc. in the amount of $312,000.00. Receive and file withdrawal of protest. #27 - DISTRICT 7 TLW: This relates to a claim that arises out of an automobile accident. It did not involve District vehicles. District had a line-cleaning crew operating up in the Tustin area. The manhole area where they were working was coned and protected u -4- �..i off. A vehicle was southbound, turned left in front of and around our vehicle which was parked and coned, and turned in front of oncoming traffic and there was a collision with vehicles a and b. For reasons unbeknownst to me, they have not justified it as far as I can tell from the paperwork at all. It's required to file a claim, as all of you know with your public agencies, that it be filed in a timely manner and they failed to meet the 100-day limit and have shown no valid reason for being late. This claim has already been pursued elsewhere and now they are coming to us. It's my recommendation that we simply take the procedure of denying the application to file a late claim. That will require them, if they want to pursue it against us, to obtain a court order to enforce us to accept the claim. The claim doesn't seem to have much merit and it's my recommendation that application be denied. CLOSED SESSION TLW: Mr. Chairman and members of the boards, we are requesting the boards to meet in closed session pursuant to the provisions of the Brown Act. The purpose of that is for us to review the current status of prior action by this Board to consider whether to initiate litigation arising out of either or both our construction contracts, J-19-2 with the Brinderson Corporation, or J-19A which is the purchase agreement with Cooper-Bessemer Industries. -5- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 3, 59 G, 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON FEBRUARY 10, 1993 PN\TATfON ., 9 "opolilnn O OIs, ZA tt`" oDo Pi R:- Siuo. 1954 OA'NGE COUNT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A modular meeting o1 the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on February 10. 1993, at 7:30 p.m.,in the Districts' Administrative Offices. Following the pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3. 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ` / ACTIVE ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Robert Richardson, Chairmen Thomas E.Lute Fred Berre2, Chairman pre tam Gana Beyer James M.Ferrymen Note Reads Thomas R.SalterYll Leslie Pontives i_ Roder Sumo. Don R. Roth r DISTRICT NO.2: Henry W.Wades, Chairman John M.GWlisson Jahn Collins, Chairman pro tam George Scott i_ Fred Banda Gene Bayer Bob Bell Barry y Danes x_ Buck LWdin Molly McClanahan x William D. Mahoney James H.Flora Maria Moreno Norman Z.Eckenride i Caney J.Nelson Glenn Parker In,Romer Tom Daly • _ Miguel Police Thomas E.LUN y Roger Stanton _ Don R.Roth George L.2laker Sheldon Singer DISTRICT NO.3: Sal A.Super, Chairman Don Madinaz 1� Burnie Dunlap. Chairman pro tam Caney J.Nelson Bock Catlin Molly McClanahan L John Collins George Scott is James V. Evans Margie L.Rice y James H.Flora William D.Mahoney Don R.Griffin Arthur Brown i_ Gag Kelly Cecilia L.Aga L Frank Lasz10 Gwen A. Forsythe L Themes E.Lutz Robert Richardson Eva G. Miner Wally Unn Iry Fielder Tom Daly Jim Silva Earle Roblusile Sheldon Singer George L.Zlaket is Roper Stanton Don R.Roth Charles Sylvia Ronald Bates DISTRICT NO. 5: 1 John C.Co..Jr..Claiman Jan Debsy • Don R. Roth Roper Stanton y Phil Someone Joe Debay DISTRICT NO.B: . James A.Wahner, Chairman Arthur Perry _ Evelyn Ran, Chairman pro tam _� John C.Cos,Jr. y_ Don Rod _ Roper Stanton DISTRICT NO.7: Charles E.Puckett. Chairman Thomas R. Saharelll James A.Wanner,Chairman pro tam Mike Schaefer Fred Samoa Gas Bayer L Jan DeWy Phil Sansone y_ Barry Hammon Mike Ward y_ Ted Moreno Miguel sonde i Don R. Roth Roger Stanton ourrn C1 NO.11: Grace WrKhall, Chairman Earle Ilobitafle �L Vmtor Leipzig, Chairman pro tam Jim Silva y_ Roger Stanton _ Don R.Roth Dlfffl F NO.13: re John M.GWlisson, Chairman Henry W.Wades Fred Somers, Chairman pro tam _ Gene Beyer Z Glenn Parker Burnie Dunlap L Iry Pickier Tom Daly + Don R. Roth Roger Stanton DUrrA T NO.14t Peer A. Swan,Chairman _ Darryl Millar `r ' Leslie Pontius, Chairmen pro tam �_ Charles E.Puckett a/' Fred Senera Gene Boyar • Dairy Hammond Mike Ward x Don R. Roth Roger Stanton —2— 02/10/93 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board `..� Secretary, Corinne Clawson, Gary Hasenstab, Ed Hodges, Charles Nichols, Bob Ooten, Mary Simpson, Jack Vincent OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Pat McGuigan, Richard Partin, John Shaw, Phil Stone DISTRICTS 5. 6 & 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpts re Board Appointments That the minute excerpts from the following re election of mayors, appointment of alternate Directors and seating new members of the Boards, be, and are hereby, received and ordered filed, as follows: ('Mayor) City/Agency District Active Director Alternate Director Costa Mesa 7 James A. Wahner Mike Scheafer Sanitary Dist. Newport Beach 5 John C. Cox, Jr. Jan Debay ` ..� Phil Sansone Jan Debay 6 Evelyn Hart John C. Cox, Jr. 7 Jan Debay Phil Sansone ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman presented resolutions of Presentation of resolutions of appreciation and plaques to retiring Directors appreciation and plagues to retiring Pat McGuigan, who represented the City of Directors Santa Ana on the Board of District No. 3; and Richard Partin who represented the City of Cypress on the Board of District No. 3. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed recently- Presentation of Districts' pin to seated Director Jan DeBay to the Boards and new Director presented her with a pin bearing the Districts' logo. The pin is similar to the service pins given to employees and recognize the Directors for their service on the Boards of the Sanitation Districts. . `ate -3- 02/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman reported that nine �✓ Report of the Joint Chairman Directors had attended the new Directors' Orientation and Treatment Plant Tour held on January 30, 1993. He observed that it is a very interesting and informative session and urged the new Directors that were not able to attend the first one to attend a second session being planned. Chairman Mahoney also reported that assignments to the Boards' Committees had been made and a listing would be mailed to the Directors in the next few days. He further commented on the opening on the Stringfellow Advisory Committee and requested any Director interested in this assignment to contact either he or the General Manager. The Joint Chairman then announced the tentatively scheduled upcoming meetings as follows: Fiscal Policy Committee - Wednesday, February 17th, at 5:30 p.m. Executive Committee - Wednesday, February 24th, at 5:30 p.m. Directors Burnie Dunlap and James Ferryman were invited to attend. Conservation, Recycle and Reuse Committee - Thursday, February 25th, at 5:30 p.m. Joint Works Selection Committee - Tuesday, March 9th, at 12:00 p.m. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager also commented on, Report of the General Manager the new Directors' Orientation and Treatment Plant Tour. He added that the Directors could contact him and he and staff would make themselves available for a separate session for those Directors unable to attend the group tour and orientation. Mr. Sylvester also stated that all of the new Directors and those Directors attending the orientation received a copy of an updated version of the Directors' Information Book. He said that other Directors that would like the updated version could pick one up at the Board Secretary's table that evening. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 02/10/93 DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 13, 1993, and the adjourned meeting held January 20, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 13, 1993, and the adjourned meeting held January 20, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held �..✓ January 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or amendments Approval of Minutes to the minutes of the regular meeting held January 13, 1993, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -5- 02/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 01/13193 01/27193 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - S 423,834.71 $ 1,221,939.47 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 970,961.11 1,873,435.73 Joint Working Capital Fund - 190,785.88 578,787.33 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 350.32 226,462.83 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 340.00 1,715.71 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 5,126.17 47,155.67 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 24,756.18 33,688.41 DISTRICT IN 5 - 1,128.66 8,400.02 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 0.00 872.96 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 11,329.68 115,285.98 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 59.33 13,216.80 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 0.00 75.38 DISTRICT NO. 14 - 4,738.89 9,306.52 �...� DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - 339.09 44,686.90 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 2,060.62 32.31 DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 14.40 6,602,85 - S7.635.825.04 54,181,664.67 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding Twenty-Five 125) Sets of Filter Media (Belts). Specification That the bid tabulation and recommendation No P-130. to Gierlich-Mitchell. Inc. re award of Purchase of Twenty-Five (25) Sets of Filter Media (Belts), Specification No. P-130, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said purchase order contract be, and is hereby, awarded to Gierlich-Mitchell, Inc. for a total amount not to exceed $83,600.00 plus sales tax. -6- 02/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue a purchase l 1 order to PacTel Meridian Systems for That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to �..r Amendment No. 1 to the Telephone issue a purchase order to Pactel Meridian System Maintenance Agreement for Systems for Amendment No. 1 to the the Districts' telephone PBX and Telephone System Maintenance Agreement related equipment ISoecification for the Districts' telephone PBX and related No. 5-0601 equipment (Specification No. 5-060), to extend said agreement for a one-year period from February 22, 1993 through February 21, 1994, for an amount not to exceed $30,936.00 for existing equipment. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 18 to the plans and specifications for Job That Change Order No.18 to the plans and No. J-19-1 specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $267,851 .00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for six items of additional work, and granting a time extension of 90 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo That the Selection Committee certification 1 / Engineers for preliminary design of the final negotiated fee relative to the `✓ report for Job Nos. P1-41 and P2-48 Professional Services Agreement with John Carollo Engineers for preliminary design report for Rehabilitation of Clarifiers 3, 4 and 5 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-41, and Rehabilitation of Clarifiers D through Q at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-48, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-12, approving said agreement with John Carollo Engineers for said services, on an hourly-rate basis for labor plus overhead, direct expenses, subconsultant fees and fixed profit, for a total amount not to exceed $59,806.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -7- 02/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: `i Authorizing the Selection Committee to negotiate Addendum No. 3 to the That the Selection Committee be, and is ` Professional Services Agreement hereby, authorized to solicit a proposal and with John Carollo Engineers for negotiate Addendum No. 3 to the design. construction support services Professional Services Agreement with John and preparation of operation and Carollo Engineers for design, construction maintenance manuals for Job support services and preparation of Nos. P1-38 and P2-43 operation and maintenance manuals for Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-38, and Miscellaneous Improvements to Facilities at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-43, providing for additional effort required to complete seismic retrofitting of non-structural items. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the Selection Committee to solicit proposals and neaotiate a That the Selection Committee be, and is Professional Services Agreement for hereby, authorized to solicit proposals and Job Nos. P1-40-2 and P2-47-2 negotiate a Professional Services Agreement for Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-40-2, and Facility Modifications and Safety Upgrades at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-47-2. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing staff to issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to No. 56714 issued to Bell Securities issue Change Order No. 1 to Purchase Order and Investigations. Inc. for 24-hour No. 56714 issued to Bell Securities and guard service at Central Power Investigations, Inc. for 24-hour guard service Generation Buildings at Plants 1 and 2 at Central Power Generation Buildings at and for worker's compensation Plants 1 and 2 and for worker's surveillance compensation surveillance, providing for an extension of guard services through the month of March at Plant No. 1 and through the month of May at Plant No. 2, increasing the total authorized amount from $25,000.00 to $50,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive. file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy Committee That the written reports of the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committee Committee's meeting and Executive Committee's meeting held on January 20, 1993, and January 27, 1993, respectively, be and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -8- 02/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Revising Districts' Procedures for - Settlement of Claims Made Against That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the Districts: Settlement of Claims Resolution No. 93-13, Revising Districts' Made by the Districts: Collection of Procedures for Settlement of Claims Made Delinquent Accounts Owing to the Against the Districts; Settlement of Claims Districts: and Settlement of Civil or Made by the Districts; Collection of Administrative Enforcement Actions: Delinquent Accounts Owing to the Districts; and rescinding Resolution No. 88-61 and Settlement of Civil or Administrative Enforcement Actions; and rescinding Resolution No. 88-61 . Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adopting a Policy Pertaining to Future Areas to be Served by the Districts That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt and rescinding Resolution No. 85-207 Resolution No. 93-14, re Adopting a Policy Pertaining to Future Areas to be Served by the Districts, and rescinding Resolution No. 85-207. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written report of the Conservation. Recycle That the written report of the Conservation, and Reuse Committee Recycle and Reuse Committee meeting held on January 28, 1993, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Wastewater Quality. Treatment and Diversion Study Receive and file Staff Report dated January 21 , 1993 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Staff Report dated January 21, 1993 re Wastewater Quality, Treatment and Diversion Study be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. -9- 02/10/93 Receive and file Wastewater Quality. Treatment and `✓ Diversion Study Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Wastewater Quality, Treatment and Diversion Study dated October 1992, prepared by Boyle Engineering Corporation, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Authorizing staff to proceed with preliminary planning and evaluation of alternatives re possible interplant diversion of wastewater flows to optimize water quality for reclamation: and authorizing discussions with Orange County Water District. and other affected parties. the planning and funding of design and construction of such projects In response to questions and concern expressed by Director Collins pertaining to the Districts' current policy and practice of diverting the Santa Ana River Interceptor, which transports a portion of District 2 flows and wastewater from the Upper Santa Ana River Basin, including treated wastewater from the Stringfellow pretreatment plant, from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2, the Director of Engineering reported that the Wastewater Quality, Treatment and Diversion Study, conducted by Boyle Engineering Corporation, was done to assess the impact of wastewater conveyed to the Districts' treatment facilities by the Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) and other trunk sewers, and existing and planned groundwater improvement and reclamation projects in both the Upper Basin and Orange County, on the quality and recyclability of water at Reclamation Plant No. 1 which is provided to the Orange County Water District's (OCWD) Water Factory 21 and their Green Acres Project for recycling. The content of total dissolved salts (TDS) in the sewage has been increasing. It presently exceeds the limit for recycling and is projected to increase even further because of proposed brine removal projects to improve Orange County's groundwater. -10- 02/10/93 The purpose of the report was to study various alternatives for improving the quality of the wastewater treated at this plant for recycling. A principal reason for the report was to address the policy and practice of diverting the SARI/Stringfellow wastewater from Plant No. 1 to Plant No. 2. At the present time Plant No. 1 is not treating the SARI interceptor, which is the largest sewer interceptor tributary to Plant No. 1 . That flow is being diverted to Treatment Plant No. 2. One of the alternatives discussed in the report is to continue a permanent diversion of the SARI line which conveys considerable brine from groundwater rehabilitation projects in the Upper Basin area as well as within Orange County. It is the saltiest of the water we receive at Plant No. 1 . The recommended alternative in the report would allow the continued diversion. If flows continue to be diverted, the report shows, it would require other wastewater to be conveyed to Plant No. 1, which would necessitate construction of a new pump station to divert to Plant No. 1 , wastewater now tributary to Plant No. 2 so that flows could be equalized between the two treatment plants as ultimately called for in the Master Plan. The Master Plan provides for building out both plants to equal size. Right now there are no plans to switch but it is something the Directors will have to address in the future. If the pump station to allow long term diversion of SARI is not built, eventually the SARI wastewater would have to be treated at Plant No. 1 . The sole technical reason that flows would be diverted is to provide a better quality water to the Orange County Water District for their reclamation projects. The report has now been referred to the Water District. They are going to study it to determine how they wish to proceed. The staff will keep the Directors fully apprised of any consideration to change the current diversion policy and practice. Director Swan observed that the quality of the treated wastewater from the Stringfellow plant is almost drinking water quality and is better than most industrial discharges to the Districts' sewerage system. Director Stanton expressed his ongoing concern and reminded the Board members that the original proposal from Stringfellow for discharges to the Districts' sewerage system was for a three-year period, but that it had been subsequently extended for two additional three-year periods. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized and directed to proceed with preliminary planning and evaluation of alternatives pertaining to possible interplant diversion of wastewater flows to optimize water quality for reclamation; and, FURTHER MOVED: That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to discuss with the Orange County Water District, and other affected parties, the planning and funding of design and construction of such projects. �..� -11_ 02/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS `..� Actions relative to Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 21 Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that in November the Directors approved plans and specifications for Job No. P2-23-5-1, which expands the Operations Center adding 8,900 square feet of basement and first-floor facilities, the remodeling of 1,800 square feet of existing building, and a 4,500 square foot enclosed electric cart parking/charging area. The work includes new locker facilities, offices, elevator and general upgrades to the existing building which was built in 1977. Mr. Dawes further reported that on October 6, 1992, nine bids were received for this contract ranging from a high of $3,238,400.00 to a low of $2,537,193.00. Several bidders, however, filed protests, and following staff and General Counsel's recommendation, the Directors rejected all bids and authorized rebidding of the project. On December 8, 1992, twelve bids were received, ranging from a high of $2,784,700.00 to a low of $2,323,982.00. However, on January 13, .. 1993, following General Counsel's recommendation, the Directors again rejected all bids due to bid irregularities. Bids were again received on January 19, 1993, ranging from high of $2,670,147.00 to a low of $2,284,864.00. Mr. Dawes reported that a letter protesting award to the low bidder was received from Culp Construction Company stating that the bid did not list all of the contractor license numbers on the subcontractors. The Director of Engineering reported that listing subcontractors' license numbers is not a state bidding law requirement and the Directors have the authority to waive that requirement. Anorovina Addendum No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 5 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2), making miscellaneous technical clarifications and modifications, be, and is hereby, approved. -12- 02/10/93 Receive and file letter from Culp Construction Company protesting award of said lob Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from Culp Construction Company dated January 20, 1993, protesting award of Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) to the apparent three low bidders, alleging that their bids do not meet the specifications, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file General Counsel's Memorandum Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Counsel's Memorandum dated January 25, 1993, relative to bid protest, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Denving protest of award of said job to Javaid Contractors, Inc. Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the request from Culp Construction Company to reject the apparent three low bidders on the basis that the bids did not meet the specifications, be denied. Awarding Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 21 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-15, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation, waiving the bid irregularity of Javaid Contractors, Inc., and awarding contract for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid No. 2) to Javaid Contractors, Inc., in the total corrected amount of $2,284,864.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -13- 02/10/93 ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28 (Rebid) Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that in January 1992, the Directors approved plans and specifications for Job No. J-28, which upgrades the pump station telemetry and monitoring systems for the outlying collection system pump stations operated by the Districts. This action is in accordance with the 1989 Master Plan, which recommended replacement of the aforementioned system due to degraded reliability and unavailability of spare parts. Mr. Dawes further reported that in August 1992, bids were received for this project. However, a software licensing dispute arose and, upon advice of counsel, all bids were rejected and the Boards directed staff to reformulate and rebid the job following the resolution of the software licensing issue. On January 12, 1993, seven bids were received for the project, ranging from a high of $604,933.00 to a low of $312,000.00. The Districts `...� received a letter of protest from Canus Corporation dated January 20, 1993, claiming that the low bid submitted was too low. Mr. Dawes noted, however, that a request to withdraw their bid protest had been received from Canus Corporation dated February 10, 1993. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. J-28 (Rebid) Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28 (Rebid), making miscellaneous clarifications to the contract documents, be, and is hereby, approved. -14- 02/10/93 Receive and file letter from �..� Canus Corporation protesting award of said iob Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from Canus Corporation dated January 20, 1993, protesting award of Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28 (Rebid) to the apparent low bidder, alleging that the bid did not meet the specifications, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file General Counsel's Memorandum Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Counsel's Memorandum dated January 29, 1993 relative to said protest, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Receive and file letter from Canus Corporation withdrawing protest Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the letter from Canus Corporation dated February 10, 1993, withdrawing their bid protest for said job, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed. Awarding Pump Station Telemetry and Monitorina System, Job No. J-28 (Rebid) Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-16, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for said project to Soffa Electric, Inc., in the total amount of $312,000.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -15- 02/10/93 �✓ ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the Directors of General Counsel's Comments Prior to the need for a closed session as authorized Closed Session by Government Code Section 54956.9 to review: 11 Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to the co-generation internal combustion engines. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section The Boards convened in closed session at 54956.9 8:06 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:40 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. \..� DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:40 p.m., February 10, 1993. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:40 p.m., February 10, 1993. DISTRICTS 3 & 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving and authorizing execution of Indemnification Agreement and That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Collectible Work Authorization with Resolution No. 93-17, approving and Southern California Gas Comoanv authorizing execution of Indemnification (SCGC) re Contract No. 11-17-1 Agreement and Collectible Work Authorization with Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) for relocation of 8-inch and 2-inch gas mains required in connection with Slater Avenue Pump Station Sewage System Improvements, Contract No. 11-17-1; and, -16- 02/10/93 FURTHER MOVED: That payment to SCGC in an amount not to exceed $64,000.00 for said relocation be, and is hereby, approved. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. �..� DISTRICT 3 Actions relative to Lamoson Interceptor Sewer, Contract No. 3-24-2 Approving Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-24-2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 1 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of $149,630.71 to the contract with Peter C. David, Inc. for nine items of added or deleted work; granting a time extension of 50 calendar days for completion of said additional work; and for contract-specified deduction for liquidated damages for 155 days based on the rate of $200.00 per day, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-24-2 l„r Moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of $5,912.00 to the contract with Peter C. David, Inc. for adjustment of engineer's quantities, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Contract No 3-24-2 as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Board of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 93-18-3, accepting said project as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the 1 1 meeting so adjourned at 8:40 p.m., February 10, 1993. -17- 02/10/93 DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:40 p.m., February 10, 1993. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:40 p.m. February 10, 1993. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing the General Manager to execute a Supplemental Aareement That the Board of Directors hereby adopts with Atchison Topeka and Santa Fe Resolution No. 93-19-7, authorizing the Railway Company (AT&SFI, to install General Manager to execute a Supplemental and maintain a new manhole within Agreement with Atchison, Topeka and Santa AT&SF's right-of-way in connection Fe Railway Company (AT&SF), to install and with Contract No. 7-20 maintain a new manhole within AT&SF's right-of-way in connection with Abandonment of Navy Way Pump Station and Force Main, and Construction of Replacement Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 7-20; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment to AT&SF in the amount of $150.00 be, and is hereby, authorized. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Application for Leave to Present Late Claim of Loyd T. Nitzen. 11 Authorizing consideration of Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Application for Leave to Present Late Claim of Loyd T. Nitzen. II Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors do hereby authorize consideration of a supplemental agenda item relative to Application for Leave to Present Late Claim of Loyd T. Nitzen, 11, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date because the request to take said action arose subsequent to the agenda being posted. -18- 02/10/93 General Counsel's report The General Counsel stated that this claim is an automobile accident which �..� did not involve District vehicles. A line-cleaning crew was operating in the _ Tustin vicinity, with the manhole area where they were working coned-off and protected in accordance with standard traffic control and safety measures. The claimant was southbound and turned left in front of and around the District's vehicle which was parked and coned, and turned in front of oncoming traffic, thereby causing a collision. It was Counsel's opinion that the claim is not justified and it was his recommendation that application to file a late claim be denied. Receive, file and deny Aoolication for Leave to Present Late Claim of Loyd T, Nitzen. II Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Application for Leave to Present Late Claim of Loyd T. Nitzen, II dated January 18, 1993 in an undetermined amount for alleged personal injuries and general damages incurred in connection with a vehicle accident in the vicinity where Districts' equipment and routine maintenance was being performed in the City of Tustin, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and denied; and, FURTHER MOVED: That said claim be, and is hereby, referred to the District's General Counsel and liability claims administrator for appropriate action. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:40 p.m., February 10, 1993. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:40 p.m., February 10, 1993. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:40 p.m., February 10, 1993. _19_ 02/10/93 DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adiournment �...� That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned. The Chairman then deciared the meeting so adjourned at 8:40 p.m., February 10, 1993. Assistant Secre ;of#e Boards of Directors nit of County Sa ionDWtricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 -20- FUND NO 9199 - Jt DIST 6URKIN6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1/C7/93 FA4E REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID EI/13/93 POSTING DATE 41/13/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127012 AMERICAN TELEPMONL 1 TELEGRAPH $i.363.65 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 127023 ALPHAGAI $4.540.41 SPECIALTY GASES 127014 BLAME P ANDERSON $56.02 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 127015 ABC LABORATORIES $2.492.5U SERVICE AGREEMENT 127016 ANATEK SERVICES INC $5.186.64 UNIFORM RENTALS 127017 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT sBU1.39 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127016 ARROW TRUCK BODIES 6 EQUIP 4640.64 TOOL BOX 127019 ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SERV. $34.133.21 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 127020 AMSA 41T5.4b TRAINING REGISTRATION 127021 AUTOMATIC DATA FROCESSIN6 1149gb9.4,] PAYROLL PROCESSING SERVICES 127022 AWARDS 6 TROPHIES 136.79 PLAQUES 227023 BKK LANDFILL 11.bH2.b5 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 127024 DPW SAFETY 6 SUPPLY s2.140.99 SAFETY SUPPLIES 127025 BANANA BLUEPRINT >b.139.56 BLUBPRINTING SERVICES 127026 BARCLAYS LAW PUBLISHERS 4168.25 PUBLICATION 127027 BATTERY SPECIALTIES s625.64 BATTERIES 127628 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC 46,433..4 LAB SUPPLIES X 227029 BEBCO INDUSTRIES 3414.56 INSTRUMENT PARTS S 227030 BELL SECURITY 43,349.60 TEMPORARY SECURITY SERVICES 227031 WT bILLARD INC S575.07 RUCHING REPAIRS bG 127032 DOLTRONIA DATA MAINTENANCE $285.06 COMPUTER DISC MAINTENANCE 127033 BOOT BARN s246.9b REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 127034 HUILUER•S EMPORIUM &140.84 HARDWARE/LUMBER y 127035 HNI BOOKS $106.0O BOOKS I 227036 GARY G STREET) 13.U20.44 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT N 127037 CLM CORPORATION si0T.29 LAB SUPPLIES 127038 CS COMPANY 15.268.84 VAL" PARTS 127039 JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 1979519.64 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36, PI-20 127040 SUSIE CAY65 $6.250.00 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL - 327041 CENTURY SAFETY INST 6 SUPP $437.54 SAFETY SUPPLIES 127G42 THE COBS GROUP 185.12 SUBSCRIPTION 127043 COCA COLA FOLDS UIVISION 125.bB5.11 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127044 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT Co $262.15 LAB SUPPLIES 127045 COLICH ANC SONS $672.193.UC CONSTRUCTION I-9 127046 COMPRESSOR COMPONLNTS OF CA 41.6TT.56 PUMP PARTS 127047 COMPUSA. INC. $3.129.59 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 127648 CONNELL GM PARTS / DIV 121..b TRUCK PARTS 127049 CONSOLIDATED ELLCTRICAL DIST s6002.99 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 12705C CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $1,547.47 TOOLS 127051 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CU SS.232.50 CHLORINE 127052 CONTNACTOR•S BOOK STORL s135.5C BOOKS 127053 CONTROLCO s916.9,. ELECTRIC PARTS 127054 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C 15.151.b2 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 127655 COOPER INDUSTRIES INC 1411.24 MECHANICAL PARTS 127C56 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 17b5.41 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 127057 CRANE VEYOR CORP 11.471.65 PLUMBING SUPPLIES ' FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING UAIL 1107/93 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION OISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID LIJ13193 POSTING DATE 11/13/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127059 STATE BOARD OF EOUILIIATIDI, S251.21 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAGE FEES 127059 OFFICE OF SELF-INS PLANS 1350.32 MUD PREVENTION 127060 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $58.96 TIRES 127061 HSK/DECKER $212.31 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 127062 DE GUELLE S SONS GLASS CO $171.74 GLASS 227063 DELL COMPUTER COOP 53,676.26 COMPUTER PARTS 227664 DEZURIK AbD/OR CS CU Sih 1.i. VALVE 127065 STATIC ENVIRONMENTAL 53.621.06 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-12-92 121066 DIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES 175U.48 PRINTING 127067 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC t3.buu.u( PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 127068 EIMCO PROCESS EQUIP CO 11.874.85 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 127069 EAGLE ENTERPRISES S7u8.uu HARDWARE 12707C EASTMAN INC $661.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127071 ENCHANTER INC $4,480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 127072 ENVIRONMENTAL PROD. USA S2U6.97 CLEANER 127073 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOC $1,003.11 LAB SERVICES 127074 FIT SAND AND GRAVEL INC 4341.35 ROAD BASE m 127075 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S7,620.U5 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 X 127076 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN PE 53.400.G0 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-22-2, J-16 2 127077 FECERAL EXPRESS CORP $498.25 AIR FREIGHT W 127078 FERRELLGAS 3102.0. PROPANE 127079 FISCHER 6 PORTER CO $9.854.99 CHLORINATION PARTS 127080 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $2.995.46 LAD SUPPLIES/FURNITURE 127081 FLUID HANDLING SYSTEMS 51,119.25 PUMP PARTS n 127GS2 FORMA SCIENTIFIC. INC. 15.154.21 LAB SUPPLIES N 127083 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA 418.64 FILM 127GB4 FOA INDUSTRIAL SALES 3467.41 OFFICE FURNITURE 127085 FREEDOM IMAGING t143.4b SERVICE AGRESMENT 127086 FURON DEKORON 422.42 FREIGHT 227087 GADAHL LUMBER CO 5222.3b LUMBER 127G86 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUFPLV CO. $463..1 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 127089 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO S7b3.YG TELEPHONE SERVICES 127090 GIBSON RESEARCH CO $35.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127091 GIERLICH-MITCNELL INC $16.454.82 MECHANICAL PARTS 127092 DON GREEK A ASSOCIATES 36,16G.6u SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 127693 NB TYPE 4 GRAPHICS $82.90 PRINTING 127694 HARKER EOUIPME111 CO 5.29.2T MECHANICAL PARTS 127095 MACH COMFANY 1934.59 LAB SUPPLIES 127696 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASTI 3163.51 LAB SUPPLIES 127097 HATCH A KIRK 114C $115.22 MECHANICAL PARTS 127098 MAULAWAY CONTAINERS t1,086.U4 CONTAINER RENTALS 127099 PL HAWN CO INC 5213.69 ELECTRIC PARTS 127IGG HILTI INC 34.643.81 TOOLS 227102 J.T. HORVATH G ASSOC. 52,352.GD CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, PI-38-2 127102 RS HUGHES CO INC $1,300.51 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 227103 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH .546.ub WATER USE FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE a/.7/93 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF UHANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID L1/13/93 POSTING DATE LS/13/93 WARRANT NO. VLNUOR AMOUNT UESCRIPTION 127104 HUNTINGTON ' BEACH RUBBER STA 5177.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127105 HTUROTLA INC 53.430.66 OIL 127106 I A W 0 312G.UG SUBSCRIPTION 12720T 1 D E R s170.92 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 127108 IRO INDUSTRIES 6598.92 SWITCH 127109 INFERIAL VEST CHEMICAL $54,181.93 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-14-90 127110 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $444.21 CONNECTORS 127111 INGRAM PAPLA 3342.7V OFFICE SUPPLIES 127112 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 63.256.GB BATTERIES 127113 CITY OF IRVINE 3570.4W ADJUST MANHOLE GRADES 127114 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT 5154.8: WATER USE 227115 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUFP 61,124.26 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 127116 JIM-S SUSPENSION SERVICE S30.0C VEHICLE REPAIRS 127227 JOHNSON POILR OF NO.AMEMICA 513.641.O. DRIVE SHAFT 127218 JOHNSTONE SUPFLY 3878.8, ELECTRIC PARTS 127219 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARCWARL C $430.29 ELECTRIC PARTS 127220 KEMPER REAL ESTATE MGMT CO 3150.00 REAL ESTATE LEGAL REVIEW 127121 KING BEAMING INC $1.550.60 MACHINE SUPPLIES 127122 KNOK INDUSTRIAL 6Uf FLIC3 S1021.9. TOOLS 2 L27123 MARTIN KORDICR SR 5..580.35 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 127124 LAKLWOOU INSTRUMENTS $2,288.55 INSTRUMENT PARTS 227125 LANDMARK RESEARCH INT•L CORP 155.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127126 LEBI-TECH 6320.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 127127 LEE A NO CONSULTING ENGA $7.N23.94 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-33 a 127120 LILULNT CASSIDY A FR IEKSON S.3.491.9. ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 1 127329 NBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL s933.33 OCEAN MONITORING W 227139 MOT BIOLOGIC COMPANY 5:45.7s SERVICE AGREEMENT 127131 MPS $457.97 PHOTO SERVICES 127132 MACOMCO $577.39 SERVICE AGREEMENT 227133 MANLEY•S BOILER REPAIR CO. INC S1U053.OW BOILCR REPAIRS 127134 RANTER S766.49 GROUNDSEEEPING SUPPLIES 127135 MARINE E VALVE SUPPLY $642.65 VALVES - 227136 MARRIOTT HOTEL - ORLANDO 3"4K5.61 TRAINING REGISTRATION 127137 MARVAC ELECTRONICS $356.11 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 127130 MICROAGE OF CERRITUS $417.15 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 227139 MIDWAY MFG 6 MACHINING 93.370.64 MECHANICAL PARTS 127140 MOh TGUMERV BROTHERS INC $402.2. LAB SUPPLIES 121141 JM MUNTGOMLRY ENGINEERS s"750..4 ENGINEERING SERVICES 127142 MOORE PRODUCTS CO $1,182.51 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 127113 MOORE A TABER 3:5.000.46 EMERGENCY PIPING REPAIRS 127144 NATIONAL BUSINESS 60NLN•S 369..6 TRAINING REGISTRATION 127145 NATIONAL RENT A FENCE CU 3TI1.8W FENCING RENTAL 227146 NA71ONAL FIRE PROTECTION AS $412.75 PUBLICATION 127147 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL s69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTAL 127148 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS - 3704.79 SAFETY SUPPLIES 127149 NEW HERMES INC (F $115.03 PLASTIC SHEETING FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PNOCLSSING DATE ./.7/93 IAGL 4 R EPGKT NUMBER AP43 CUUNIV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE IOUhIY CLAIMS PAID E1/13/93 POSTING DAIL a1/13113 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OESCRIPTION 127156 NEWARK ELECTRONICS f271.19 HARDWARE 127251 CITY OF NEWPOK7 BEACH >19.58 WATER USE 127152 NIAGARA CONSERVATION CORP. s58.63 WATER CONSERVATION SUPPLIES 127153 NORCAL CONTROLS INC $1,221.19 PUMP 127154 NOVELL RESEARCH ORDER DLSK $269.36 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 127155 OCCUPATIONAL VISION SLAVICLS 5350.15 SAFETY GLASSES 127156 OFFICE PAVILION/IhTERIJR RES 14067.5'- OFFICE FURNITURE 127157 OR SYSTEMS CO f",352.24 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 127158 ORACLE CORPORATION f3r760.89 TRAINING REGISTRATION 121159 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C s8a.65 TRUCK PARTS 227166 COUNTY CLERK s25.GG ANNEXATION FEE 127161 ORANGE COURIER ♦b23.6C COURIER SERVICES 127162 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. 3801.81 FITTINGS 127163 OSCARrS LOCH S SAFE »1.72 KEYS 127164 OXYGEN SERVICE 44.234.13 SPECIALTY GASES 127165 PACIFIC PARTS $1,761.05 FREIGHT m 127166 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO a659.02 SAFETY SUPPLIES X 127167 PACIFIC BELL $13.2u TELEPHONE SERVICES = 127168 PACIFIC WALK-IN MEDICAL 3136.00 LAS INOCULATIONS 121169 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C fb8.4C RENTAL EQUIPMENT 127170 FACTEL MERIDIAN SYSILMS >3.499.7b TELEPHONE SYSTEM UPGRADES 127171 PAGENET $54.00 PAGER RENTALS 127172 PAK WEST $52.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES Oa 127173 PARAGON CABLE $36.76 CABLE SERVICES L27174 PARTS UNLIMI7LU sl•i9W.9`+ TRUCK PARTS 127175 PEAT MARUI[N MAIN t CC >1 r820.00 AUDITING SERVICES M.O.3-13-91 127176 PERKIN-ELMER CORPORATION $614.30 LAB SUPPLIES 127177 PIMA 4RO SYSTEMS IIYC $109.926.44 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 127178 POLYPURE INC 413,635.36 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 127179 VALIN CORP AND/ $264.56 LAB SUPPLIES 127186 PORT SUPPLY s601.58 LAB EQUIPMENT 127181 POSTMASTER $406.44 BULK MAIL POSTAGE 12718. PRESSURE GROUT CO $21,600.00 GROUTING SERVICES 12710 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE Slf 6.GG ICE 127164 THE PROJECT SULUTIONS CO. 18.928.06 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 127165 PROTOTYPE INC 31.740.4b TRAINING REGISTMTION 127166 PYRAMID FENCE COMPANY 5667..4 FENCING 127187 OULSTRON CORP 11r785.EL LAB SUPPLIES 227188 RPM ELECTRIC MOTORS sa•973.:2 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 127189 RADIO SHACK $32,0 ELECTRIC PARTS 127190 THE REGENTS $295.60 TRAINING REGISTRATION 227191 MCJUIIKIN-NEPUbLIC SUPPLY 32r578.55 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 127192 RICH COLOR LAB 32S.u5 PRINTING 127193 ROSEMOUNT/UNILOC 3754.7E INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 127294 RYAN-HERCU 3b47.8. METAL 127195 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP 3173.4E PARTS CLEANER FUND NO 9299 - JT LIST 60RKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DAIL 1/67/93 PAGE 5 ALFOR7 NUMBER AP43 CUUNTT SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID U1/13/53 PUSTIN6 GATE 61/16/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR ANOUNI ULSCNIP110N 127196 SANCON ENGINEERING INC 11.800.60 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 127197 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASIILS .195.53 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 127190 SEA COAST DESIGNS 11.327.37 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 12T199 CITY OF SEAL BEACH $535.50 WATER USE 127260 SHURELUCK SALES 15.14S.U6 HARDWARE 127201 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO s144.b. LAB SUPPLIES 127202 SMITH-LMLRY CO s3.LG4.UC SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 127203 SOLNA$ CORP 54.31U.Gw CHEMICALS 1272C4 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 19 R14.66 POWER 127205 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO S4b.125.UC DIESEL/UNLEADED FUEL 127266 SPARXLETTS DRINKING WATER 12029.53 DRINKING WATER/COOLER RENTALS 127207 SPARLING INSTRUMENT CO INC 18.404.65 METER 1272Cb STAMEN 2 SPASSOFF FL s3.366.tu ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19-2 127269 WESTALLOY INC $676.34 WELDING SUPPLIES 127210 SPEAKER SUPPORT 1128.12 PRESENTATION AIDS 127211 STANCO•S VACUUM SEPVCE 159b.57 VACUUM TRUCK SERVICES 127212 STERLING ART $163.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES X 127213 STROMUOTNE PRI.TIN6 sE.6U5.4b PRINTING Z 127214 SUMMIT STLEL 11..4L.67 METAL 127215 SUNSET FORD 196.53 TRUCK PARTS t" 127216 SUFELCII INC sub T.3. LAB SUPPLIES 127217 SUPER CHEW CURP 31,338.85 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 127219 TAYL UR-DUNN MPS COMPANY $1.283.78 TRUCK PARTS y 117219 TEKTRONIX INC 61055.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1 127220 THOMPSUN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 52.ae8.6b MACHINE SUPPLIES LIT 127221 TODDS LNTERPRLSLS. INC. $8,775.16 RECONCILIATION REFUND 127222 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. s7b3.66 SERVICE AGREEMENT 127223 TRAVEL TRAVEL 91.376.28 TRAVEL SERVICES 127224 TRUCK 1 AUTO SUPPLY 1NL $2.435.59 TRUCK PARTS 127225 TUSTIN DODGE s5b1.7S TRUCK PARTS 12722b US AUTO GLASS CENTERS $55.89 TRUCK PARTS 121221 UNDERWATER KINETICS 1349.54 LAB SUPPLIES 127225 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE s509.86 PARCEL SERVICES 127229 UNIVERSAL FLOORING SVSTEMS $739.99 CARPETING 121230 YWR SCIENTIFIC 14.586.63 LAB SUPPLIES 127231 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLV CO 43.3.5.15 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 127232 VALLEY OETROIT DIESEL s3.247.84 ENGINE PARTS 127233 YAM NOSIRAND REINHOLD 175.54 BOOK 127234 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $275.32 LAB SUPPLIES 127235 VERNLOS PLUMBING 119.933.b0 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 127236 VILLAGE NURSERIES s3911.WU LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 127237 VORTEX INOUSTRItS $798.43 BUILDING MATERIALS 127238 WALL STRLLT JOURNAL 1.4V.77 PUBLICATION 127239 6ASHIMGION STATL DEFT ECOL06V s40.G0 PUBLICATION 127240 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUFFLY 121.8b5.3U CAUSTIC SODA M.O.0-12-92 127241 WESTIN ENGINELRIN. s..926.94 ENGINEERING SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST VURKINb CAPITAL FROCLSSING VAIL 1/0/93 IAGL 6 REFOKI NUMB LN AP43 LUUNIT SANITATION D14IR11TS OF 4KANGL LUUNIT CLAIMS PAID L1/13/93 PUSTING GAIL C1/13/93 WARRANT NO. VENOUR AMOUNT ULSCNIPTION 127242 VMLSSOE VANLC 46,50.44 FREIGHT 127243 XCROM CORP s.b.<27.4b COPIER LEASES 127244 GEORGE YARDLEY CO 3577.0C INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 127245 JOHNSON FOKOGAVA CORP s5U9.,3 INSTRUMENT 127246 YORK INTERNATIONAL 1260.63 ELECTRIC PARTS 127247 RICHARD YOUNG PROD s154.55 TAPES 127240 2A6EN IhC 16,367.5, SOFTWARE SUPPORT _________________ TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 61/13/93 $1,635.825.04 SUMMARY AMOUNT 41 CAP FAC FUND $340.00 I71 42 OPER FUND $2,706.17 X 42 CAP FAC FUND $2,420.00 = 43 OPER FUND $24,716.33 R3 CAP FAC FUND $39.85 45 OPER FUND $719.07 --1 F5 CAP FAC FUND $408.79 n 47 OPER FUND $3,999.60 47 CAP FAC FUND $7,330.08 C71 412 OPER FUND $59.33 414 OPEN FUND $111.80 R14 CAP PAC FUND $4,627.09 R566 OPER FUND $103.44 . 4566 CAP FAC FUND $235.65 N647 OPER FUND $2,060.62 47614 OPER FUND $14.40 JT OPER FUND $423,834.71 CORP $970,961.11 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $350.32 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $190,785.88 ___________________ $1,635,825.04 FUND NO 9199 - J7 OIS7 WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSINW UATE 1/aa/93 PAbE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF 4NANOE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID .1/E7/93 POSTING DATE ."aTI93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127283 AS TECH COMIANV 5640a7.1. RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.30-9-91 127284 A T L T 64a9.33 LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 12728E ACLU-LABS RESEARCH INC :230.00 LAB SERVICES 127286 ACTION ELECTRONICS $72.43 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 127287 AOVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC $423.704.00 CONSTRUCTION PI-34-3 127205 AIR PRODUCTS L CHEMICAL IN S17032.L0 06M AGREEMENT CRY. GEN SYST M.O.8-9-89 127289 ALBERTSON.S MARKET 46L4 S388.ba USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 121290 ALNERTSONS 662C $971.63 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127291 ALBERTSON$ INC 0193E •1,793.99 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127292 ALL METALS PROCESSING 604.36 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127293 ALLIED PACIFIC si6.118.Ga USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127294 ALPHAMETICS INC 6990..9 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127295 AMU RICM DIETARY FRODUCTS $149.49 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 327296 AMERICAN SERVICE INDUSTRIES b21T.3S MECHANICAL PARTS 127297 AMERICAN S16MA S1.471.7u METER PARTS 1272" KETEMA INC 6a.652.16 MECHANICAL PARTS m 127299 ANABOLIC INC 61,118.64 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT X 127300 ANAHEIM CAR WASH 6,29.6. USER FEE OVERPAYMENT = 1273C1 ANAHEIM CITRUS PRODUCTS S50.672.90 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1273C2 ANAHEIM INTERNATIONAL INN $169.37 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 0 127303 ANAHEIM MOTEL S33.75 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127304 ANAHEIM ROYAL INC $309.16 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127305 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL $140.06 SERVICE AGREEMENT TA 127306 A-PLUS SYSTEMS S953.31 NOTICES 6 ADS 1 BDO1273C07 C LA LAB SERVICES 12738 UATIC TESTELIBORTOY i LAB SERVICES O IM 3 .l . 0004 227309 ABATER SERVICES INC $7.56 UNIFORM RENTALS 127310 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT 51.410.92 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 127321 ARROWHLAO FURITAS WATERS $168.63 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127312 ARTS DISFOSAL SERVICE INC b450.4b HAZARDOUS WASTE REMOVAL 127313 A340CIATEO LABORATORIES 69L5.66 LAB SERVICES 127314 ARIA S315." REGISTRATION FEES 127315 AWARDS 5 TROPHIES 6303.75 AWARD PLAQUES 127316 SKK LANDFILL 64,097.76 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 227317 GAS SAFETY S SUPPLY 41.636.61 SAFETY SUPPLIES 12731E bANCROFI-WHITMEY CO 424...♦ PUBLICATION 127319 BANK OF THE WEST 949.656.71 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION J-23-2 12T320 BARCLAYS LAW PUSLISHLRS SBb.6u PUBLICATIONS 127321 8 BATEMAN S600.64 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 127322 SAUER COMPRESSOR 6759.11 COMPRESSOR PARTS IBISES BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC S6.167.95 LAB SUPPLIES 127324 BEACH-LIN CAN WASH 530.94 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1273a5 BEACON RAY ENTERPRISES INC. s36S.92 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127326 BEHR FROCESS CORP $2.177.87 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127327 ROBERT SEIM ULLIAM FROST 42.646.77 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5-33 327328 BELL SECUNITY 45..24.40 TEMP. SERVICES - CENTRAL GEN FUND NO 9299 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE I/21193 FAGE 2 R LFURI NUMbLR AF43 LWNTI SANITATION UISTNICIS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID L1/27/93 POSTING DATE L1/17/93 / WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT ULSCRIPTION 127329 BloCTCLE s5b.66 SUBSCRIPTION 127330 OISHUI COMPANY S6e6.8, TOOLS 127331 BLACK BOA CORP $199.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES L27332 BLACKWELL SCIENTIFIC $65.6. LAB SUPPLIES 127333 BOB'S LAUNDROMAT SSA.69 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127336 KEVIN BOJAN $683.63 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127335 BOOT BARN 1429.2. REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 127336 BOYLE EN6INEERIN6 CORP 151.891.0 ENGINEERING SRRVICBS 7-19, 5-37-3 127337 BRIGHT ARMOR PLATING $8.75 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127338 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $3,539.59 ELECTRIC PARTS 127339 BRbADVAY MOTEL 1286.75 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127346 6RO.N 6 CALDWELL CONSULTIN. 117.542.U3 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-11-1 127341 BUDGET JANITORIAL 1..650.C4 JANITORIAL SERVICES 127342 bUILDER-S ENPURIVM 1177.66 HARDWARE/LUMBER 127343 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFF $347.50 PUBLICATIONS 127349 BURKE ENGINEERING CO 42.513.90 INSTIUARNT PARTS 227305 BUSH AND ASSOCIATES INC 19.06b.6W SURVEYING SERVICES H.O.6-10-92 X127346 GARY 6 STRIED S:.i33.07 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT = 227367 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY SIA3.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127346 CEFA 1196..: LAB SUPPLIES bG 127349 C M I $2,395.29 METER 127350 CAC PRESS INC $273.90 LAB SUPPLIES 127351 CS COMPANY 111605.69 VALVES W 127352 CAL-COMPACK FOODS 13.99O.6b USER FEE REFUND I 127353 CALTNOL INC 12.286.67 REGULATOR PARTS N 127354 CALIFORNIA AUTO COLLISION INC 1.077.5b TRUCK REPAIRS 227355 CANDY CANE MOTEL $279.22 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127356 JOHN CAROLED ENGINEERS 59.596.75 ENGINEERING SERVICES 127357 CASE SAAYNE CD.. INC. 12.175.2b USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127358 CAVALCAUL ESCROW CORP 1306.UL ESCROW FEES 127359 CENTRE SNANUS INC. $2.7.27 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12736C CMAFMAN HOSPITAL $25.72 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127361 CHURCH ENGINEERING INC $Ib,b20.b6 ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-9-RI 127362 CINEDUME THEATRES 1917.51 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 127363 CIRCUIT INDUSTRIES 1..677.32 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12736E CIRTECH INC. N1 19u0.53 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127365 SOUTHERN CAL MATERIAL HANDLING 11.322.66 TRUCK LIFT 127366 CLLAN CITY LAUNDRIES $36.45 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127367 COAST FIRE EGUIPMLNT $281.23 SAFETY SUPPLIES 127369 COASTALMOIION 01,584.0. MEMBERSHIP DUES 127369 COIN LAUNDRY 5733.67 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127370 COIN LAUNDRY Si16.lu USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127371 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT Cu $258.78 LAB SUPPLIES 127372 COMMERCIAL DOOR OF U.C.. INC. S355.66 BUILDING REPAIRS 127373 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS 6F CA $899.43 COMPRESSOR PARTS 127374 COMFUSA. INC. 1718.U2 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST NURKIN6 CAFIIAL FROCLSSIM6 DATE 1/22/93 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTNICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID .1127/93 POSTINb DATE 6l/27/93 WARRANT NO. VENUUR AMOUNT ULSCAIPTLUN 127375 CONNECTOR TECHNOL66Y CO 65..4E USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 127376 CONSOLIDAIED ELECTRICAL GIST ttl•Y91.a5 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 197377 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC $1.472.56 TOOLS 127378 CONTINENTAL WESTERN WATER .6.294.91 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127379 CONVERSE CONSULTAaTS 0 L 51,378.94 BOIL TESTING 127380 CORONADO SGUARL $45.14 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127381 COSMOTRUNIC 636S." USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127362 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY $829.64 TRUCK PARTS 127363 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 5573.22 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 127384 CROSBY L OVERTON INC. 4105r000.60 OIL SPILL CLEAN-UP M.O.1-13-93 127365 CROCKETT CONTAINLM CORP si5.953.19 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127396 STATE OF CALIFORNIA f1r:7B.1L HAZARDOUS WASTE TREES 127387 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 542.46 HAZARDOUS WASTE TAXES 127388 STATE OF CALIFORNIA $110.13 DIESEL USE TAXES 127389 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ti43.04 HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR TAXES 127390 DAILY PILOT s64.75 NOTICES 6 ADS 127391 DAMES s MOORE 53..57.3a ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-38-3 ITT 127392 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 5218.60 TRUCK TIRES X 127393 DATA CIRCUITS $806.33 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT rZ.. 127394 DATA ELECTRONICS $93.19 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT IF 127395 BE LE JON ENTERPRISES $1.169.66 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127396 DEL ESTE MOBILE ESTATES •170.44 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127397 DELTA FOAM PRODUCTS $149.13 LAB SUPPLIES by 121390 CALIF. DEPT OF FISH G GAME 5662.UU LAKE/STREAM ALTERATION AGREEMENT 2-9-RI I 127399 DEZURIK ANU/OR CS CO .65.843.82 PLUMBING SUPPLIES W 127406 DIAIEC ENVIRONMENTAL s3.68L.86 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-12-92 227401 DICEON ELECTRONICS INC 62,456.27 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127462 O161TAL EQUIPMENT CORP $19,383.43 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 127403 DIGITAL TECNNI40ES9 INC. 53.066.25 TELEPHONE L27404 SYCON CONF S4I1.76 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1274C5 DOCTORS NOSPI7AL OF SANTA ANA t301.83 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127406 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $9.110.89 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 12740T DOVER ELEVATOR COMPANY 5820.0E ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 1274CO OUNN EDWARDS CORP 31.127.b1 PAINT SUPPLIES 127409 DUKO-SENSE CORP 6177.78 MECHANICAL PARTS 127416 OIL TECHNIQUE $2,363.97 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127411 E F NOU6NTON Sb4.b3 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127412 EIMCO PROCESS ECUIP CO - 61.867.78 MECHANICAL PARTS 127413 EMA SERVICES INC $2,583.35 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-23-2 127414 EASTMAN INC S7.J30.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127415 EASTO6N CENTER $695.41 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12741E ECONOMICS PRESS INC 52.556.6L PUBLICATION 127417 EL TOROITO GRILL 6227 578.29 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127410 ENCHANTER INC 12.680.0u OCEAN MONITORING H.O.6-10-92 127419 ENGINEERED STORAGE SYSTEMS 5835.6E OFFICE FURNITURE 127429 ENVIRONMENTAL REGOURCE ASSOC S1.Ob3.16 LAB SERVICES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST VORHIN6 CAPITAL FROCLSSIhG DATE 1/a./93 PAGE R EPOkT NUMOEk AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CUUNIT CLAIMS PAID C1/:T/93 POGTING DATE L1/E7/9S WARRANT NO. VLN04R AMOUNT DESCRIPTION L27421 ESSENCE GROUP $1,417.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127422 EXTLMDED CARE hOL111AL $350.93 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 127423 MARSHALL IAIkkL5 aaLe.V6 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 127424 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 65.980.uV RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 127425 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 4519.56 AIR FREIGHT 127126 FEhRELLbA6 676.55 PROPANE 127427 FILTER SUPPLY CO 611:.Vb FILTER 127428 FISCHER a PUNTER CO 44,834.91 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 127429 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $543.93 LAB SUPPLIES 127430 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $1.139.20 LAB SUPPLIES 127431 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. 61.670.66 CONCRETE CUTTING 127432 FLICKINGEk CO 6:BL.11 VALVES 127433 FLO-SYSTEMS $1,264.12 PUMP PARTS 127434 CLIFFORD A FORMLkT 6...466.9. SURVEYING SERVICES M.0.6-10-92 127435 FOSS ENVIRONMENTAL $1.066.44 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 227436 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA $149.53 FILM 127437 FOUNTAIN VALLEY PAINT 6267.4L PAINT SUPPLIES m 127436 FOUNTAIN VALLEY REGIONAL HUSP S6.00.39 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT X 127439 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES 965.4V MECHANICAL PARTS 2 127440 FREDERICK PUMP 0 ENGINLLNIN 5570.bG CHLORINATION PARTS 127441 FREEDOM IMAGING S65.81 LAB SUPPLIES 127442 BUD FRET S21.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 127443 FRYERS AUTO SPAS $28.64 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127444 CITY OF FULLERTON $44.66 WATER USE 127445 FUROR OCKUNDN a22.12 FREIGHT J: 227446 URC RESTAURANTS INC.. 416 $126.46 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127447 GET. INC. 6465.46 PRINT SUPPLIES 127118 GANAHL LUMBER CO 4176.61 BUILDING MATERIALS 127419 UARRAT7-CALLAhAN COMPANY $3.053.64 CHEMICALS 127450 GATES FIBERGLASS INSTALLLRb »06.00 FIBERGLASS INSTALLATION 127451 GEMINI INDUSTRIES 37.746.62 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 227452 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO S594.44 SERVICE AGREEMENT 127453 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $195.43 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 127454 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $1,626.66 TELEPHONE SERVICES 127455 GEORGE L SONS COIN-DP LAUkURY 6T11.53 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127456 GEORGE LEECH 6 ASSuC1ATLS 1511.40 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 127457 GIEHLICh-MITCNELL INC $9.122.34 MECHANICAL PARTS 127458 GOLDENGEST LAUNDRY 5211.85 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127459 GRANDE TORTILLA 6b.b81.32 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12746C 6RAPhIC DISTRIBUTORS 61{736.66 CAMERAS/FILM 127461 DUN GREEN L ASSOCIATES $3.553.06 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 127462 GROIN EQUIPMENT CORP S118.74 FREIGHT 127463 GROVE INVESTMENT 637.93 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127464 THE GROVE HOTEL $155.63 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 197465 GULLIVLRS $550.67 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1274b6 h L S MANAGEMENT S9b1.0b USER FEE OVERPAYMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YOFKIN6 CAPITAL FROCLSSING DATE 1/.i/93 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF UKANUC CGJNII CLAIMS PAID E1/iT/93 POSTIMu DAIL L1/21/93 / WARRANT NO. VENDUR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127467 HSW TECHNOLOGY 4356.9.8.39 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2 127468 THL RICbANU A HALL COMI-ANT 35.431.63 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127469 HALVORSEN-STRIP SHOPPING CRY 5759.63 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127470 FRED A HARPER a1.50U.60 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 127471 HARRINGTON INDUSTRIAL PLASH 3:.440.57 MECHANICAL PARTS 127472 HATCH 6 KIRK INC 6366.4b MECHANICAL PARTS 127473 HEALTHCARE MEDICAL LLNTER A269.15 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127474 HCWLETI PACKARD 469D.JL SERVICE AGREEMENT 127475 HILTI INC s993.58 TOOLS 127476 J.T. HORVATH 6 ASSOC. 33.136.6E CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1 127477 PS HUGHES CO INC 1539.12 PAINT SUPPLIES 12747E HUNTER CORPORATION 3344.328.13 CONSTRUCTION 3-19-1 127479 CITY OF HUNTINGTON bEACH 4i2.991.2$ WATER USE 127480 HUNTINGTON BCH CONY HOSPITA $50.81 USER FEB OVERPAYMENT 127481 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER SIR 633.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127482 HUNTINGTON SIGNAL OIL CO 6342.80 USER PRE OVERPAYMENT 127483 HUNTINGTON SUPPLY 335.02 HARDWARE R1 127484 HYATT NENFURILR 34.338.69 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT X 127465 IMO INDU57RIES $163.27. ELECTRIC PARTS 2 127486 IDEAL UNIFORM RENTAL SERVIC 6540.68 USER PEE OVERPAYMENT W 127497 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL 973rb40.38 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-14-90 127488 INDEPENDENT CATERING $176.41 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127489 INDUSTRIAL FILTER MF&S 487.65 GASKET 12749C INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRUDUCIS a1r126.9b CONNECTORS 127491 INN Al THE FARR $5,293.53 USER PEE OVERPAYMENT 127492 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS 1558.73 BATTERIES 127493 INTERSTATE ENGINEERING 4790.96 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127494 ISLANDER MOTEL 526.33 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12749B JLA CREDIT CuRF 4145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE - 127496 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO $42.87 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127497 JJHNSTUNE SUFFLY 42.650.5. ELECTRIC PARTS 127496 JONES CHEMICALS INC ST.bB3.76 CHEMICALS 127499 KATNAR MF6 $4.407.12 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 1275CC ALLMAN 6 ASSOCIATES S4r953.04 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1275C1 KENNEDY HYDRAULICS a:H44.o6 PUMP PARTS 1275F2 KIKKHILL RUBBER 43a628..1 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 2275.3 KNDA INDUSTRIAL SUFFLIES 43.511.86 TCM68 127504 MARTIN KOROICK SR 33r144.bG CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 127SC5 KRAFT U.S.A. 683.715.99 USER FEE OVERPAYMBNT 127506 LA FITNESS ANAHLIM INC. 4907.bb USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127567 LA PALMA . INTLR HOSP 41.121.57 USER LIES OVERPAYMENT 127508 LA DUINTA MOTOR INN $2.349.18 USER FEB OVERPAYMENT 1275P9 LANDMARK DANK 4557.Ui USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127516 LAUNUCNLANU 61 Sa13.94 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127511 LAUNDERVOPLD SL 16O.9i USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127112 CHAKLES P. CROVLEV CU. Sb60.17 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES FUND ND 9199 - JT 01 ST uLRKING CAFI TAL PROCESSING 041E 1/2i/93 PA4L u R EFOR7 NUMBER AP43 LUUNTV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID L1/27/93 POSTING DATE L1/27/93 WARRANT NO. VLNOOR AMOUNT ULSCRIPIION 121523 CRC FREES INC. $u7.4t PUBLICATION 127514 KP LINDSTROM INC $6,715.97 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 127515 LGRAIN PkODUCTS 61.324.57 RELIANCE POWER SERVICE AGREEMENT 127516 LOS ANGELES TIMES s6s.76 NOTICES 6 A0S 127517 M.N.E. LAUNDRY $407.12 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127510 MPS 440.38 PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 127519 MPS PH070GRAPHJC SERVICE 61.726..d USER PER OVERPAYMENT 127526 NACONCO 6463.61 SERVICE AGREEMENT 127521 RAG SVSTLMS $24.73 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 127522 MAGIC LAMP NOTLL 5375.06 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127523 MANLET-S BOILER REPAIR CO. INC si.30Y.2k BOILER PARTS 127524 9D6'S BIG SOY $454.24 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127525 MARTIN LUTF.ER HOSFITAL A133.94 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127526 MASK TECHNOLOGY $585.0 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127527 MATT - COLOR INC $7,700.95 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 127528 MC CURDY CIRCUITS INC. 02 *510.53 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127529 MC DONALDS OF AMERICA %A29.4G USER PER OVERPAYMENT M 127536 MC BAN. INC. •bb.379.49 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT = 127531 M C P FOODS $2.219.36 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127532 METRO CAR NASM $151.64 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT by 127533 RIGEL INC $3.118.73 USER FES OVERPAYMENT 127534 MIDLAND MFS CORP 67ru06.91 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 127935 MIDWAY MFG S MACHINING $2,615.66 MACHINE PARTS OO 127536 MISSION INDUSTRIES - $519.78 UNIFORM JACKETS 1 127537 MIICHELL INSTRUMENT CO 67E.GG METER CI 127538 MONITOR PLATING $464.5. USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127539 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO $165.64 SUBSCRIPTION 127540 MONTGOMERY LAbURATORILS L6r21G•u4 LAB SERVICES M.O.5-8-91 127541 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICES 1204.67 CELLULAR TELEPHONE USAGE 127542 MOTOROLA CELLULAR GROUP $2.173.61 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SYSTEM 127543 RUDYrS MUN01 LAbNDNIES 66511.3S USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127544 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION AS 68..0 - PUBLICATION - i27545 NESLAB INSTRUMENTS 63.516.79 LAB SUPPLIES 127546 NEW HCRILONS CONFUTER CLNTL $1.284.0U TRAINING REGISTRATION 127547 NE.PURT DUNES INC $6.362.66 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 227548 NOkDSTM6M 4226.1. USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127E49 OGG REFROGRAPNICS INC 694.2E USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12755C OFFICIAL AIRLINE GUIDE A 3415.0L SUBSCRIPTION 127551 THE ONMART CORP SL.379.6G INSTRUMENT PARTS 127552 DX SYSTEMS CO $64,627.29 CHLORINE M.0.11-18-92 127553 ORACLE CORPORATION $5.931.96 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 127-54 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $166.81 TRUCK PARTS 127555 ORANGE COUNTY FAIR L LXYO CYR 68.310.19 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127556 ORANGE COUNTY FARM SUYFLV C 41.766.23 GROUNDSKEEPING SUPPLIES 127557 ORANGE VALVE L PITTING CO. $2.313.59 FITTINGS 127550 OXYGEN SERVICE s2.131.52 SPECIALTY GASES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING UATE :/c./93 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AF43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID L1/27/93 POSTING DATE C1/27/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT GESCNIPIION 127559 COUNTY OF ORANGE $4.360.36 SERVICE AGREEMENT - RADIOS 127560 COUNTY OF ORANGE "'IA6.46 DATA PROCESSING SERVICES 127561 ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD S55r40C.6L SIPHON CONSTRUCTION 127562 CSUOC SELF-FUWOED MEDICAL I 420C.400.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE 127563 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT $2.270.17 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP 127564 FSI REPAIR SERVICES INC 4529.25 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127565 PSSI f1rLU4.tG SEWER VIDEO INSPECTION 12756E PACIFIC PARTS 41rG89.23 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127567 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT EO 61.694.1: SAFETY SUPPLIES 12756E PACIFIC BELL $1,075.72 TELEPHONE SERVICES 127569 PACIFIC WATER CONDITIONING C 368.4. RENTAL EQUIPMENT 12757E FACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 66.69b.CG SERVICE AGREEMENT 127571 FAURC JANITORIAL SUPP ii.546.87 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 127572 PAULNET 454.00 PAGER RENTALS 127573 FAK WEST $136.47 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 127574 F.F. PAULUS, INC ii1.660.66 PIPING INSTALLATION 127575 ROY PENDERGRAFT 646u.4G DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION X127576 PETROPRIZE 192.3b USER FEE OVERPAYMENT = 127577 PHYSIOTRGNICS CORP. USA 6456.54 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 127576 P1NA URO SYSTEMS INC 6105r471.63 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 OG 127579 PITNEY BOWES S1r792.15 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 127580 P17NEY BOWES CREDIT CORP $373.69 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 127561 PLACENTIA LINDA CORM MOSPI7 $4,380.93 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127582 PLOVELAD LAMINATES INC. 45b4.27 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT b10 127563 POLYMETRICS. INC. 563.200.26 LAB EQUIPMENT M.O.6-30-92 V 127584 FOLYPUkE INC f3:.b01.4S CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 127585 PRENTICE - HALL INC $102.54 PUBLICATION 127586 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE 442.L6 ICE 12750 PRINTRONIA $129.25 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127568 PROFESSIONAL TREE CARE 6b00.60 LANDSCAPING 127589 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 45.G8r.OU INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 127590 PROTOTYPE INC 65.9:..2S COMPUTER SOFTWARE 127591 PUBLIC RISK MGMT ASSOC 6198.00 PUBLICATION 127592 PURE CH EN PRODUCTS $601.32 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 227593 QUALITY BUILDING bUPFLY 503.72 BUILDING MATERIALS 127-94 RAIMkOW DISPOSAL CO S.103.96 TRASH REMOVAL 127595 RECTC INC 144.911.5b RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 127596 RED WIN6 SHOES 4337.9i REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 127597 711E REGISTER 11.407.9C NOTICES 6 ADS 127598 REISH MARINE STUDIES. INC 11r600.GG OCEAN MONITORING 127599 REMOTE METER RESETTING SIST 4S.GYO.OG POSTAGE 127600 MCJUNKIN-REVU5LIC SUPPLY 41.200.11 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 127601 kESEARCk PRODUCTS INT. CURE 1691..b LAB SUPPLIES 127602 RUBY INN MOTEL $467.99 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127603 SIR AUOIMAR MOTEL 1369.15 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127604 PL66Y RUPP 1510.11 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST NCRKIN6 CAFIIAL PROCESSING DATE 1/2t/93 FADE b RLPOHI NUMBLN AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF uRANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID C1/27/93 POSTING DAIS ul/17/93 / WARRANT N0. YENDUR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127605 SUSTI PELICAN 5170.04 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 127666 S I C OIL CORP 5444.66 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127667 S A J CHEVROLET S.09.G3 TRUCK PARTS 127608 SKC WEST $730.54 GAS SUPPLIES 127609 S 15 PLATING $759.43 USER PER OVERPAYMENT 12761E SABATASSO FOOD INC 53.120.7h USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127611 SAFETY-KLEEN CORP 5526.2E PARTS CLEANER 127612 SAFETY SUPPLY OF AMERICA $427.47 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 127623 SANCUN EN61NEERING INC $5.556.64 ENGINEERING SERVICES 127624 SANTA ANA ELECTRIC MOTORS 11.667.42 ELECTRIC MOTORS 127615 SANTA ANA ENGRAVING CO. 556.6E USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127616 SARBS-POC •48.VU PUBLICATION 127617 SANTA FE INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 55..14.57 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 127616 SARTORIUS CORE $675.09 LAB SUPPLIES 127619 DOUG SARVIS S1.575.CG CPR/FIRST AID TRAINING 127620 THE SCHOOLEN CO S240.UO APPRAISAL SERVICES 7-24 127621 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L $41,310.63 OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 m 127622 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES INC 55.581.45 SPECIALTY GASES >G 127623 SECURITY SPECIALISTS 51.506.06 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS = 227624 SEES COLOR IEATILES INC 418.258.Ob USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127625 SENICUA $272.14 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127626 SHAMROCK SUPPLY $602.76 TOOLS 127621 SHELL OIL COMPA14T - 52.528.N6 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 227628 SHURELUCK SALES $9.224.10 MECHANICAL PARTS to 1 197629 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO $400.65 LAB SUPPLIES OO 127630 SILVER MOON MOTEL $411.75 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127631 SILVERI A LE BOUEF $43.158.60 CONSTRUCTION 7-14-1-1 127632 SKYPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL CLI $711.56 PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 127633 SMITH PIPE L SUPPLY INC S19.1C PLUMBING SUPPLIES 12TE34 SOFT WATER WASH $149.58 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127635 SOLDER STATION ONE 562.6L USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 221636 SOLDER TECHNOLOGY $75.31 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127637 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO $433,663.59 POWER 127638 SO CAL GAS CU 524.079.19 NATURAL GAS 127639 SOUTHERN CALIF TRANS SLR $54.99 PAINT SUPPLIES 127640 SO CALIF 6A7LR CD 414.36 WATER USE 127642 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OIL CO $13,277.90 DIESEL FUEL 127642 SOUTHWEST FOODS INC. $144.93 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127643 SPECTRUM-HUMAN RESOURCL SYS 54.920.0E SERVICE AGREEMENT 127644 SPLEUY CIRCUITS INC $109.24 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127645 SPEX INDUSTRIES INC S..963.73 LAB SUPPLIES 127646 STAGE STOP MOTEL Sh87.2`. USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127647 STARbUCM TRUCK REFINISHING S2.725.0L TRUCK PARTS 127640 STATE COLLEGE CAR WASH $14.5. USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127649 STATER COMP 51.921.7E USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127650 STEPAN COMPANY 545.970.52 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WUkkING CAPITAL FROCLSSIN6 DATE 1/2i/93 PAGE 9 6LPGRT NUMBik AP43 COUNTY SANITATION UISTM MIS OF URANbE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID L1/27/93 POSTING DATE ui/27/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127651 STERLING ANY 656.4u OFFICE SUPPLIES 227652 STEVENS PUbLISRIN6 CUNF "99..L SUBSCRIPTION 127653 STINSON ELECTRIC SFECIALTY C $203.95 ELECYRIC PARTS 127654 SUMNERIOOD CENTER $57.66 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127655 SUMMIT STEEL 35.360.65 STEEL 127656 SUNSET FORD 14i.7. TRUCK PARTS 127657 SUPELCO INC 51.184.63 LAB SUPPLIES 127658 SUPER CIRCUYS iE1 G.13 USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 127659 SUR-LITE CORPORATION 621.463.92 GAS FLARE TESTING M.0.8-10-92 12766D TAYLOR-DUNN NP6 COMPANY 92,439.24 TRUCK PARTS 127661 TEXAS COMMERCE BANK 11C.364.76 TRUSTEE SERVICES M.O.I1-14-90 127662 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL 164Y.12 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127663 SO THOMAS INC 13.G87.1D USSR FEE OVERPAYMENT 127664 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 6385..4 MECHANICAL PARTS 127665 THRIFTY COIN-OP LAUNDRY 5112.41 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127666 TOLEDO SCALE CORP. 3930.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT 127667 TONV-S LOCK 6 SAFE SERVICE S246.57 BUILDING REPAIRS X 127669 TRAFFIC CONTRLL SERVICE INC 12.610.DU CONSTRUCTION LANE CLOSURES S 121669 TRANI f1.G1635 PAINT SUPPLIES 127670 TRAVELODGE TIFFANY INN S195.63 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127671 TRIPLE M PACKING S2.699.45 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT -q 127672 TROPICANA INN 63.130.b6 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127673 TRUCK L AUTO SUPPLY INL $5,246.51 TRUCK PARTS C 121174 JO TUCNER 1 SON INC 48.641.68 INSTRUMENT PARTS 127675 UCI IRV INE 6530.3E USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127676 US AUTO GLASS CENTERS $55.89 TRUCK PARTS 127677 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 6109.9b USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12767E US POSTAL SERVICE $21.61 USSR PRE OVERPAYMENT 127679 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 1362.8b PARCEL SERVICES 127660 UNITEC PARCEL SERVICE 1146.75 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127681 VUC TLSTIN6 $5.000.00 EMISSIONS TESTING 127682 VbR SCIENTIFIC S1.460.57 LAB SUPPLIES 127663 VACATIONLAND 13.233.86 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127684 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO S9.736.47 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 127665 VALLEY DETROIT DIESEL 1483.54 GRNRRATOR REPAIRS 127686 VAN WATER .L ROGERS $1.529.45 CHEMICALS 127687 VANIEk BUSINESS FORMS $490.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 127668 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $1,991.95 LAB SUPPLIES 127689 VERNE-S PLUMBING S100.OV PUMP PARTS 127690 VENTER SYSTEMS S845.oj COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 127691 WARREN GORMAM 6 LAMONT INC $128.71 PUBLICATION 127692 6ATER ENVIRONMENT FED. S.9.2B PUBLICATION 127693 WELLS MARINE 19.144.3C USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127694 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUIFLY 125.493.61 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-12-92 127695 WHESSOE VAREC. INC. $726.54 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 12T696 WILLDAN ASSOCIATES $11,505.1. ENGINEERING SERVICES 2-31 FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST 6ORNING CAPITAL (` PROCESSING DATE 1122193 PAGE 1, REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANIIAIION DISTRICTS OF UNAN6E CUUNIY CLAIMS PAID L1127/93 POSTING DALE 11/27/93 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 127697 YINONICS CORP $3,235.14 USER HE OVERPAYMENT 12769E ROURKE I WOUORUFF L OR •t,3014.bi LEGAL SERVICES H.O.2-19-92 127699 WOODYrS WHARF $573.29 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127700 WORLD CITRUS WEST INC 61r5118.77 USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 127701 XEROX CORP $179.61 COPIER LEASES 1277E2 YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEMS .113.72 FREIGHT 127703 JOHNSON YUR06AWA CORP S:.72b.13 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 127704 IIEBARTH 6 ALPER/C.S. ALPER S35r OOO.CO CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 127705 2YMARR CORP. L15r217.U6 WORKSTATION, AUTOTRACE 127706 RICHARD b EDGAR 420C.GC DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ----------------- TOTAL CLAIMS FAIL L1127/93 Lprib:rbb Y.bl m SUMMARY AMOUNT X 2 W EI OPER FUND 12,762.71 92 OPER CFUND $34,392.91 76 R2 CAP FAC FUND $33,624.41 p3 OPER POND f33,$64.00 1>7 R3 CAP PAC FUND f64.00 1 95 OPER POND $3,190.65 37 i--� 45 CAP PAC FUND f3$872.96 O 96 OPER FUND ,234.47 87 CAP POND f2,051.51 07 GP PAC FUND i113,016. 0 R13 OPER FOND f13,$75.38 R14 OPER FUND 675.3E - 414 OPER FUND f099.23 E14 GP PAC FUND $1,004.12 85N6 OPER FUND 43,002.78 R866 GP PAC FUND f43,002.7E 9667 OPER FUND $32.31 JT 19 OPER FU FUND 21,939.47 JT CORF FUND $1,873,435.73 SELF f1,226,462.83 JT W FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS f226,462.83 JT WORKING CAPITAL - $518,7117.33 ------------------- $4,181,664.87 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954.2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Regular Board Meeting on 19ft was duly posted for public inspection at the mai lobby of the Districts ' offices on �TipMf4fA 19YI. IN WITtNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this j1A day of t Penny Kyle, s ant Secretary of each o�a ds�tors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 , 7, 11, 13 6 14 of Orange County, California F27A.1