Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-11-18 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS s OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127 10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018 (714)N2-2411 November 12, 1992 NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14 WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of October 14, 1992, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the above hour and date. Astist&nt B d ec terry Or Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings: AD HOC COMMITTEE RE - Thursday, November 19th, at 4 : 30 p.m. SERVICE TO OUTSIDE AREAS FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Thursday, November 19th, at 5: 30 p.m. JOINT WORKS - Monday, November 30th, at 8:00 a.m. SELECTION COMMITTEE NOTE: This Joint Board Meeting Notice reflects the Boards, change in meeting date from November 11th to November 18th because of the Holiday. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS el ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 108AA ELLIS AVENUE 20 OOX SI27 PoUMAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA Wn O+n W.2an JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings November Nov 18, 1992** None Scheduled December Dec 09, 1992 None Scheduled January Jan 13, 1993 Jan 27, 1993 February Feb 10, 1993 Feb 24, 1993 March Mar 10, 1993 Mar 24, 1993 April Apr 14, 1993 Apr 28, 1993 May May 12, 1993 May 26, 1993 June Jun 09, 1993 Jun 23, 1993 July Jul 14, 1993 Jul 28, 1993 1 , August Aug 11, 1993 None Scheduled �•r' September Sep 08, 1993 Sep 22, 1993 October Oct 13, 1993 Oct 27, 1993 November Nov 10, 1993 None Scheduled ** Holiday - New meeting date due to Veterans' Day Holiday BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County SankMan Dicta P.O.Box 8127.10844 HIS Avenue '4 of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92n"127 7"phone:(714)962-2411 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 18, 1992 - 7 :30 P.M. In accordance with the requirements of California Government Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written materials relating to each agenda item are available for public inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary. In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72 hours prior to the meeting date. (1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation (2) Roll call (3 ) Appointment of chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4 ) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders) (5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards on specs is agenda items or matters of general interest should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman, speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes. (6 ) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general interest to the Directors. These reports are for information only and require no action by the Directors. (a) Report of Joint Chairman (b) Report of General Manager (c) Report of General Counsel 11/18/92 (7) EACH DISTRICT ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the following minutes will be deemed approved as i ) mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: �✓ District 1 - October 14, 1992 regular District 2 - October 14, 1992 regular District 3 - October 14, 1992 regular District 5 - October 14, 1992 regular District 6 - October 14, 1992 regular District 7 - October 14, 1992 regular District 11 - October 14, 1992 regular District 13 - October 14, 1992 regular District 14 - October 14 , 1992 regular (8 ) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows: (Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will be regarded as the same for each District represented unless a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any District. ) See pages "A" and "B" 10/07/92 10/21/92 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 509 ,266.57 $1,046,825.28 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1 ,197 ,111.28 1 ,815,355.25 Joint Working Capital Fund - 127,164.09 162,949 .23 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 103,318.25 84,269 .12 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 5,403. 35 59 ,850.89 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 28,273.17 605,423 .84 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 39,355.06 42,436.47 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 29,264.05 8,570.11 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 3, 324. 32 57. 31 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 9,551.76 15,831.84 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 8 ,499.21 6,721 .97 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 879.20 -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 - 8,966.49 319,754.53 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - -0- 1,953.40 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3, 316.51 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 115.47 2,685.87 12,073 ,808.78 $4,172,685.11 -2- 11/18/92 ti (9 ) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(1) All matters placed on the consent calendar are considered as not requiring discussion or further explanation and unless any particular item is requested to be removed from the consent calendar by a Director, staff member, or member of the public in attendance, there will be no separate discussion of these items. All items on the consent calendar will be enacted by one action approving all motions, and casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included on the consent calendar. All items removed from the consent calendar shall be considered in the regular order of business. Members of the public who wish to remove an item from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by the chair, state their name, address and designate by letter the item to be removed from the consent calendar. The Chairman will determine if any items are to be deleted from the consent calendar. Consideration of action to approve all agenda items appearing on the consent calendar not specifically removed from same, as follows: ALL DISTRICTS (a) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-155, receiving �./ and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Chlorine in Bulk, Specification No. C-029, to DX Systems company for the price of $229.40 per ton, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions (Estimated annual cost $917,600.00 plus sales tax) . See page .1c., (b) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-156, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. P-136 . to Imperial West Chemical Company, at the unit price of $204.77 per dry ton, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions (Estimated annual cost $1,146,712.00) . See page "D" (c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, and Replacement of Portion of standby Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-22-2, authorizing an addition of $212,764.00 to the contract with Colich Bros. , Inc. dba Colich and Sons for six items of additional work, and granting a time extension of �i seven calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page -3- 11/18/92 (9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) J (d) Consideration of motion approving Change order No. 15 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $9,758.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for four items of additional work. See page IF. (a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 15 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, authorizing a net addition of $75,527.46 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation for eight items of added or deleted work. See page "G" (f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 14 to the plans and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing a net addition of $20,044.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for nine items of added or deleted work. See page ..H" (g) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-157, approving v and authorizing execution of Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for right-of-way required to operate and maintain Southern California Edison-s substation at Plant No. 2 to accommodate the interconnection of Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2. See page "I" DISTRICT 2 (h) Consideration of the following actions relative to the plans and specifications for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) , Contract No. 2-26-3; Ratella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street) , Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract - No. 2-29: (1) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of $29,774.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for one item of additional work, and granting a time extension of 126 calendar days for completion of said additional work. See page "J" [ITEM (9) (h) CONTINUED ON PAGE 5] -4- 11/18/92 V (9 ) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) (h) (2) Consideration of motion approving Change N + Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net deduction of $94,677 .50 from the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for an adjustment of engineer's quantities. See page "K" ( 3) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-159-2, accepting said contract as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. See page "L" DISTRICT 7 (i) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-160-7, approving and authorizing execution of a Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for right-of-way required to operate and maintain voltage transformer and conduits necessary to provide electrical service to Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2. See page .,M" a \� END OF CONSENT CALENDAR ( 10) ALL DISTRICTS Consi eion of items deleted from Consent Calendar, if any -5- 11/18/92 a (11) ALL DISTRICTS Ver al Report on the National water Research Institute by -- Districts' representative, Past Joint Chairman A. B. "Buck" Catlin. (12) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Fiscal Policy Committee's written report of their meeting held on October 21, 1992, and the Executive Committee's written report of the meeting held on October 28, 1992 (Copies enclosed with Directors' agenda material) . (b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended by said Committee: (1 ) Consideration of the following actions relative to Biofiltration Demonstration Project: (a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to conduct Biofiltration Demonstration Project to study the performance of biofilters for treating toxic, volatile organic and odorous compounds from Districts' off-gases. (kl) Consideration of motion approving and authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement with USC, in form approved by the General Counsel, relative to services needed for the Biofiltration Demonstration Project in an amount not to exceed $80,800.00. (c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to secure the services of construction contractors in accordance with established procurement procedures, to construct the necessary support facilities to conduct pilot testing of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project (estimated amount $25,000.00) . (d) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to secure the services of contract analytical laboratories, in accordance with established procurement procedures, to conduct the necessary testing relative to the Biofiltration Demonstration Project (estimated amount $65,000.00) . [ITEM ( 12) (b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7] I l -6- s 11/18/92 (12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6) (b) (2) (a) Consideration of motion approving and authorizing General Manager to execute a Grant Agreement with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for partial funding of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project in the amount of $124,568.00. (f) Consideration of motion approving and authorizing General Manager to execute a Grant Agreement with water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) for partial funding of .the Biofiltration Demonstration Project in the amount of $50,000.00. (13 ) ALL DISTRICTS (a) Report of the Building Committee and consideration of motion to receive, file and approve the Committee' s - written report of the meeting on October 29, 1992 (Copy enclosed with Directors' agenda material) (b) Consideration of action on the following item recommended by the Building Committee: (1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1, making miscellaneous technical modifications. (2) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3-1, changing the date for receipt of bids from September 29 , 1992 to October 6, 1992, and making miscellaneous technical modifications. ( 3) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-158, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and rejecting all bids for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1; and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid) (Tentative bid date December 8, 1992) . See page "N'- _7- Lr/ 11/18/92 (14) ALL DISTRICTS Closed Session: During the course of conducting the business set forth on this agenda as a regular meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the Boards in closed session to consider matters of pending or potential litigation, or personnel matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9 or 54957.6 . Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real property; (b) matters of pending or potential litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards during a permitted closed session and are not available for public inspection. At such time as final actions are taken by the Directors onany of these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required disclosures of information. (a) Convene in closed session, if necessary (b) Reconvene in regular session (c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered in closed session. (15) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (16) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (17 ) DISTRICT 1 Con�tion of motion to adjourn (18) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (19) DISTRICT 2 Con�tion of motion to adjourn (20) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (21) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (22) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (23) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn -8- 11/18/92 (24 ) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 25 ) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn (26 ) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 27 ) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn ( 28 ) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any (29 ) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn ( 30) DISTRICT 13 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 31) DISTRICT 13 Consideration of motion to adjourn ( 32) DISTRICT 14 Other business and communications or supplemental agenda items, if any ( 33) DISTRICT 14 Consideration of motion to adjourn -9- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,CA 9272E-8127 Telephone: (714) 962-2411 JOINT BOARDS MEETING DATE NOVEMBER 18, 1992 AT 7 : 30 P.M. The following is a brief explanation of the more important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid since the last Joint Board meeting. ALL DISTRICTS 9 (a) : AWARD PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN BULK, SPECIFICATION NO. C-029. The Districts use bulk chlorine for odor control in a system consisting of one centralized 25-ton tank and associated distribution equipment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, and two centralized 25-ton tanks and related distribution piping and equipment at Treatment Plant No. 2. Our bulk chlorine usage has dropped to about 4,000 tons per year from 6,000 tons per year for odor mitigation. This decrease is partly due to the drought and the resulting decrease in wastewater flows and partly due to increased operating efficiencies. The Districts also used approximately 300 tons of chlorine purchased in one-ton cylinders during the 1991-92 fiscal year under a separate contract as backup for the bulk stations and for remote areas of the plants with lower usage rates. On October 13, 1992, four sealed bids were opened for supplying bulk chlorine for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1992, with option to renew for four additional one- year extensions periods. Two bids and two "no bids" were received . The high bid was $265.00 per ton. The low bidder was DX Systems Company at $229.40 per ton, plus sales tax. This price represents a $43.40 per ton price increase (approximately 23%) from the current contract price. The nation-wide demand for �� -1- November 18 , 1992 chlorine has escalated due to its use in the manufacture of PVC pipe and fittings, which is a rapidly growing industry. In addition, the number of chlorine manufacturers has declined due to economic and environmental pressures. Estimated annual cost for the new contract, based on 4,000 tons, is $917,600.00, plus sales tax. The budget amount for the purchase of chlorine is $1 ,134,000.00, including $150,000.00 for one-ton cylinders on a separate contract with Continental Chemical Company. Staff recommends award of a contract to DX Systems Company for purchase of bulk chlorine for the unit price of $229.40 per ton, plus sales tax, for a one-year period, with provisions for four one-year extensions under mutually agreeable terms. 9 (b) : AWARD PURCHASE OF FERRIC CHLORIDE, SPECIFICATION NO. P-136. The Districts add ferric chloride chemical to the wastewater to enhance solids settling during primary treatment and to control digester gas sulfide levels. Ferric chloride can also be used as a backup chemical for plant odor control. The use of enhanced primary treatment assists the Operations Division in continuing to meet the NPDES 301 (h) ocean discharge waiver �../ permit limitations and AQMD permit requirements. Sealed bids were received on October 13, 1992, for furnishing and delivering ferric chloride for a one-year period, beginning December 1, 1992, with an option for four one-year extensions. Four bids and five "no bids" were received. The low bid received was $204 .77 per dry ton, and the high bid was $1 ,330.00 per ton, plus applicable sales tax. The low bid represents an increase of $44.66 per ton, approximately 28% more than the current year's contract with Imperial West Chemical Co. , which expires November 30, 1992. The price for ferric chloride usually fluctuates widely due to product demand. This product contains chlorine and hydrochloric acid, and both of these chemicals have undergone recent price increases. The Districts' contract with Chemwest for fiscal year 1987-88 was for $221 .00 per ton and was $263.00 per ton in 1988-89. In 1989-90, the contract with Imperial West was for $234.00 per ton. Additionally, AQMD regulations have nearly totally eliminated production of ferric chloride in the greater Los Angeles basin, which means the product must be transported from some distance, which greatly adds to the cost due to freight charges. Based on an estimated annual usage of 5,600 dry tons, the estimated cost is $1,146 ,712.00, plus sales tax. The budget figure for this purchase is $1 , 310,000.00. -2- \� November 18, 1992 Staff recommends award of a contract to Imperial West Chemical Company for Purchase of Ferric Chloride for the unit price of $204.77 per dry ton, plus applicable sales tax, for a one-year period, with provisions for four one-year extensions. 9 (c) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND UTILITY CORRIDOR, JOB NO. I-9, AND REPLACEMENT OF PORTION OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB NO. J-22-2. Job No. I-9, Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, provides for construction of a new 120-inch effluent pipeline, in the westerly levee of the Santa Ana River, connecting Reclamation Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2. This $21 . 3 million project also includes installation of a new fiber optic communications cable system between the control centers at Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2, and installation of a new digester gas pipeline and industrial water pipeline. Job No. J-22-2, Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall, increases the size of the old ocean outfall pipeline in Plant No. 2 from 78-inch to 120-inch, and increases the capacity of the natural gas service to serve the new Co-generation facility. Change Order No. 2 adds $212,764.00 and seven days to the contract with Colich and Sons . Items 1 and 2 add $61,539.00 to the contract for additional work in removal of the existing 48-inch interplant pipeline inside the new 120-inch pipeline tunnels under Hamilton Avenue and Adams Avenue. The contract drawings required the Contractor to remove this pipeline prior to installation of the new 120-inch reinforced concrete pipe. During removal, the existing 48-inch interplant line was found to be of heavier construction with reinforcing steel than shown on the contract drawings. This resulted in the Contractor expending additional labor and equipment for removal inside the confined work area of the tunnel. Items 1 and 2 were planned as a potential change order during original design of the job. In design of Contract I-9 , staff found conflicting historical information regarding the construction of this fifty-four year old pipeline. Some drawings indicated that the line was built with certain thicknesses of concrete with reinforcing steel; others indicated no reinforcing steel. Staff elected to show the thinner sections of concrete pipe with no steel, knowing that it would cause a change order, if in fact, the heavier sections with reinforcing steel were found. The alternative would have been to show the heavier sections of pipe and the reinforcing. It is very difficult to negotiate deductive change orders. It is much easier to control costs through additive change orders. `/ -3- November 18 , 1992 Item 3, in the amount of $15,267.00, is for removal of an undisclosed manhole on the existing 48-inch interplant line constructed in 1938. The manhole was encountered during tunneling operations for the new 120-inch pipeline under Adams Avenue. The contractor was instructed to remove the manhole and proceed with tunneling operations. Item 4, in the amount of $6, 352.00, is for an addition of three large fiberglass pull boxes inside a Reclamation Plant No. 1 utility tunnel to facilitate installation of the new fiber optic cable. Congestion inside the tunnels from the large number of existing utility lines forced the contractor to install a greater number of conduit bends than anticipated on the new interplant fiber optic cable system. This required the addition of intermediate pull boxes in order to insert the new fiber optic cable through the conduit system. Item 5, in the amount of $117,205.00, is for mitigation measures necessary for the many federal and state permits discussed below. The permits were received after the contract was bid and include conditions (i.e. , mitigation measures) added by the regulating agencies. The mitigation costs include grading work in the Talbert Marsh Wetlands between Treatment Plant No. 2 and Pacific Coast Highway adjacent to the Santa Ana River. The 950-linear-foot replacement of the standby ocean outfall was originally planned for construction with future Job No. P2-42-2, the Secondary Treatment Expansion at Treatment Plant No. 2, since that work interfered with the existing ocean outfall alignment. To complete the work within the Talbert Marsh as soon as possible before the marsh is revegetated, the Directors authorized staff to negotiate with CALTRANS in April 1991 to add this work to the initial 900 feet already installed under an existing reimbursement contract with CALTRANS. However, as it turned out, the necessary environmental permits could not be secured in time, so the change order authorized in 1991 was not executed. Subsequently, this work was included in the Job No. I-9, Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, which included similar 120-inch pipe. Because there was no certainty at the time of bidding that all necessary permits could be obtained during the term of the contract, the pipe was made a separate bid item to allow its deletion if the permits were not received; and, since any mitigation measures were unknown, none were included. (In the event of further permit delays, the installation would have been included in a future, separate contract. ) Combining the pipe purchase with the interplant pipeline gave us an exceptionally low price for this relatively short length of pipe. -4- `� November 18 , 1992 Although all permits and conditions necessary to begin construction were not completed until August 1992, a meeting was held in February 1991 with representatives of the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy (Conservancy) , U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) , U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) , California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) and the Orange County Environmental Management Agency (EMA) . It was their collective opinion that to obtain the necessary permits, OCSD should: (1 ) fill the Talbert Channel remnant isolated by the outfall crossing to eliminate expected nuisance; (2) agree to mitigation because disruptive activities would occur; and ( 3 ) determined that an acceptable mitigation appeared to be possible by creating dunes on the new fill and changing an ajacent half-acre site which was to be dunes into wetlands habitat. Staff proceeded with the design of the half-acre restoration of the Conservancy. The restoration plan was submitted, along with other exhibits prepared by staff, to support the permit applications. The grading plan was modified in response to comments from the Department of Fish and Wildlife and by staff to accommodate gas service pipeline routing and to reflect actual construction requirements. The total expense to the Conservancy for the restoration plan and for construction monitoring will amount to less than $20,000.00. A permit for the Department of Fish and Game had no significant restrictions except that landscaping be done with California native species. A permit was also required from Orange County EMA and was was received in April 1991 . A coastal development permit and then an amendment required to correct the project description, including approval from the City of Huntington Beach, were also obtained. A landscaping plan for the secondary clarifier expansion prepared in consultation with the Department of Fish and Game using only suitable California native species had to be approved by the Executive Director of the Coastal Commission. Staff hired a landscape architect for approximately $2,000. 00 to develop the plan. A written statement required from the State Lands Commission that no state lands were involved in the project took nine months to obtain, which allowed the permit to be issued in August 1992, 13 months after the permit application was made, and well after award of Job No. I-9. The Corps of Engineers permit involved review of the project by many agencies. Seven agencies suggested restrictions �/ -5- November 18, 1992 which were addressed by staff. A permit was issued after about nine months, which contained preconstruction conditions that the marsh restoration grading plan and restoration plan be specifically approved by both the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game. This required working through the Conservancy and their wetlands consultants to revise the grading plan to suit the regulatory agencies. The necessary approvals were obtained in August 1992 after an additional four months. The addition of the mitigation measures was also a planned change order. They could not be included in the original contract since the required mitigation measures were not known at the time. The work proceeded slowly. Staff did not expect to have to do as much work as was required to obtain the permits . However, it should be noted that these permits include all work necessary for the Secondary Treatment Expansion at Treatment Plant No. 2, a $36 million project which will be advertised in about six months. In that light the permit conditions may not seem excessive. Pushing both these projects now is certainly in the Districts best interest since the permit conditions and required mitigation would be much more severe if the marsh were fully vegetated. Item 6 adds $12,401 .00 to the contract for a differential sales tax adjustment on materials purchased through June 1992. The contract documents specify that the contractor may recover from the Districts any increase in sales tax over 6 .5 percent on purchased materials during the life of the contract. The above-described changes would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase and are not for replacement work. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $240,925.00 and 23 calendar days time extension. This represents an increase of 1. 13% over the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 adding $212,764.00 and seven calendar days to the contract with Colich and Sons. 9 (d) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 15 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 , JOB NO. J-19-1 . Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, is part of the $66 million master-planned Central Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at -6- `/ November 18, 1992 both plants. This $16 .0 million contract includes installation of three prepurchased digester gas burning, spark-ignited, 3472 horsepower engines with generators, which are each capable of producing 2500 KW of electrical power. Change Order No. 15 in the amount of $9,759.00 is for four items of additional work. Item 1 , in the amount of $1,873.00, is for additional circuits to provide future control power from the standby battery system to the medium-voltage switchgear. Item 2, in the amount of $2,180.00, is for providing conduits and cables for two chiller flow switches required for operation of the chillers. Item 3, in the amount of $1,528.00, is for providing raceway and cable for the interconnection of the grounding transformer to the switchgear. This work was omitted from the contract documents . Item 4, in the amount of $4,178.88, is for modifying grating support angles and aluminum railings which conflicted with the installation of the Districts-supplied generator engines and related piping. A portion of Item 2 involves rework, and the appropriate cost will be negotiated with the designer. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $615,445.00 with 103 calendar days time extension. This represents a total adjustment of 4.0% over the original contract amount. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 15 for an addition of $9,759 .00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9 (e) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 15 TO CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2. Job No. J-19-2 at Plant No. 2 is part of the new $66 million master-planned Central Power Generation System which is being built under several contracts at both plants. This $21 million contract includes installation of five prepurchased digester-gas burning, spark-ignited 4167 horsepower engines with generators, which are each capable of producing 3000 KW of electrical power, plus three prepurchased gas compressors. Change Order No. 15 is a net addition of $75,527.46 to the contract for eight items of added and deleted work. Item 1 is the addition of signal cable for the monitoring of total power generated by the engine/generators that had been omitted from the drawings, at a cost of $3,892.00. Item 2 is the revision of high voltage electrical cable splicing procedures to `/ -7- November 18, 1992 a means better suited for wet conditions with a resulting credit of $10,923 .00. Item 3 is the replacement of existing high voltage cable racks in various electrical manholes that were badly deteriorated, at a cost of $21,786 .00. Item 4 is the installation of electrical circuits for the operation of the steam turbine that were not shown on the drawings, at a cost of $41,859.00. The contractor was required to provide a steam turbine and generator to meet the intent of the specifications. It was not known prior to bid what manufacturer would provide the steam turbine package. Therefore, the complete electrical systems could not be designed until the manufacturer's drawings were developed. Item 5 was the addition of more electrical circuit testing due to changes in electrical circuits, at a cost of $6,100.00. Item 6 is the alteration and rerouting of the blow-off drain of a plant water strainer that was causing flooding when activated, at a cost of $8,296.17, Item 7 is the addition of a seal in the Operators Control Room to prevent engine fumes from entering at a cost of $3,245.00. Item 8 is the replacement of the specified pressure switches present in the air compressor because they were preventing the compressors from running continuously, at a cost of $1,272.29 . Items 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase. Item 2 is a credit for work not performed and materials not utilized. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders on this contract will be $1,673,998.01 and 218 calendar days time extension. This represents an increase of 8.5% over the original contract amount. The high change order percentage on this project is due to electrical changes, electrical omissions and late delivery of gas compressors, which was reviewed in considerable detail by the Boards when Change Order No. 8 was approved. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 15 for a net addition of $75,527.46 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this change order. November 18, 1992 9(f) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 14 TO CONSTRUCTION OF DIGESTERS NOS. 11-16 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-34-3; REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 9 AND 10 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-35-2; AND INSTALLATION OF WASTE DIGESTER GAS FLARE FACILITIES AT PLANTS 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-21. This $27.8 million project includes the construction of new Digesters 11-16 (Job No. P1-34-3 ) , the rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 (Job No. P1-35-2) and the construction of new Digester Gas Flare facilities at Plants 1 and 2 (Job No. J-21) . Change Order No. 14 adds a net of $20,044.00 for eight items of additional work and one item of deleted work to Job No. P1-34-3 . Item 1, in the amount of $3,062.00, is for the addition of vapor seals around power cable in Power Building No. 5. The vapor seals were required by NFPA 820 (National Fire Protection Code) to separate two areas within the building which have different classifications and were not shown on the contract documents. Item 2 is the deletion of a concrete sealer which was specified to be applied to the exterior digester walls. This deletion resulted in a credit of $3,500.00. Item 3, in the amount of $944.00, is for modifications to existing piping to accommodate contractor-installed sludge meters. A conflict was discovered between the specified size and the actual size of the existing piping where the sludge meters were to be installed. Item 4, in the amount of $635.00, is for increased access to the existing and new piping systems for maintenance cleaning purposes. Item 5 involves the modification of three safety relief valves on the bottom sludge transfer pumps for $944 .00. The valves were required to be increased in size from 2 inches to 3 inches to prevent future clogging. Item 6, for $9,956.00, is for the relocation of the supply air fans on the roof of Control Building 11-14. The two fans were required to be relocated to conform with NFPA-820 (National Fire Protection Code) . This relocation resulted in the installation of approximately 24 feet of additional ductwork. Item 7, for $1,078.00, is the relocation of the two stairways from the roof of Control Building 11-14 to the digester domes. The walkways, as shown on the Contract Drawings, conflicted with HVAC ductwork. Item 8, in the amount of $1,073.00, is for the installation of pneumatic valve operators at two existing sludge feed valves for Digesters 7 and 8 . The operators were shown on the contract plans to be existing, but were not. �� -9- November 18 , 1992 Item 9 involves modifications to exterior lighting around the digester facility for $5,856 .00 . These modifications were required to provide safe and satisfactory lighting at night around the digester facility. All of these items, excluding Item 7, would have been included in the original design if discovered or known in the design phase and do not include errors and omissions. Item 7, involves rework, and reimbursement will be negotiated with the Design Engineer. If the Directors approve Change Order No. 14 as recommended, the total changes on this project will have added $652, 359.54 and a total of 27 calendar days time extension to the contract. This represents an increase of 2.4% over the original contract amount. Of this amount, $353 ,670.00, or 1. 3%, was for undisclosed utilities, substructures and soil problems. The project is largely complete and in the testing phase and staff does not expect any significant future changes on this project. However, the contract contains a bonus/penalty provision for early/late completion. At this time the contractor is ahead of schedule and it appears that the early completion bonus will be $822,000. The Directors may recall that a few years ago digester capacity lagged treatment capacity and for this reason this project was accelerated and an early completion bonus included to insure timely completion of the digesters. The early completion means that sludge can digest for a longer time than our fifteen- day minimum regulation requirement, which was marginal before this project. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 14 for an addition of $20,044.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. 9 (g) : APPROVE DEDICATION OF EASEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON RE CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM PROJECT (JOB NO. J-19-2) . In April 1988, the Directors approved a Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison (Edison) for right-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the electrical substation, Orcogen, and appurtenances at Treatment Plant No. 2. Edison now needs a larger easement. The additional area is needed by for the installation of switchgear, safety equipment and a metering device to accommodate the interconnection of the Central Power Generation project (Job -10- `� November 18, 1992 No. J-19-2) . The existing duct bank, transformer and new equipment will be owned by Edison who needs the operating easement for the repair and maintenance of the electric service. The new easement encompasses all of the old easement, but is 400 square feet larger. Staff therefore recommends approval of the resolution to grant the new easement to Edison. Separately, Edison will quitclaim the smaller easement granted in 1988 to the Districts. The form of easement and quitclaim have been approved by General Counsel. DISTRICT 2 9(h) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NOS. 8 AND 9 TO PORTION OF EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER, BETWEEN BROADWAY AND ORANGETHORPE AVENUE (INCLUDING CITY OF ANAHEIM STREET IMPROVEMENTS) , CONTRACT NO. 2-26-3; KATELLA RELIEF SEWER, BETWEEN EUCLID STREET AND WALNUT STREET (NINTH STREET) , CONTRACT NO. 2-28; AND ORANGEWOOD DIVERSION SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-29 , AND ACCEPTING CONTRACT AS COMPLETE. This project is the construction of a vitrified clay and two reinforced concrete gravity sewer lines and appurtenances. Contract No. 2-26-3, Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue (Including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) ; Contract No. 2-28, Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street; and Contract No. 2-29, Orangewood Diversion Sewer, in the total amount of $8 . 3 million, are located within the City of Anaheim and the City of Fullerton. The contract is now complete. (1) Change Order No. 8 Change Order No. 8 adds $29,774.00 and 128 days to the contract for one item of added work. Reference is made to Item 5 of Change Order No. 1 which was for demobilizing the contractor and interrupting the completion of work on Contract No. 2-29 . This was due to undisclosed telephone ductbanks at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and State College Boulevard. The undisclosed ductbanks interfered with the completion of the installation of the new sewer line. This item is for remobilizing the contractor to complete the original contract work and for added work due to the relocation of the ductbanks. The relocation of the ductbanks was accomplished by PACBELL, which took nearly a year. The �� -11- November 18, 1992 final sewer installation work was also scheduled to be completed between the football and baseball seasons at Anaheim Stadium which caused much of the delay. (2) Change Order No. 9 Change Order No. 9 is the adjustment of engineer' s quantities for a net deduction of $94,677 .50. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 8 for an addition of $29,774 .00 and 128 calendar days and Change Order No. 9 for a net deduction $94,677.50 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Company. ( 3) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Steve Bubalo Construction Company has fulfilled all contractural obligations within the specified and extended time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the agenda material, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $8,649,790.08. DISTRICT 7 9(1) : APPROVE GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON RE CONTRACT NO. 7-11-2. The Directors are aware that the Michelson Pump Station has been rebuilt on a new site within the Park Place development located between Michelson Avenue and the San Diego Freeway east of Jamboree Boulevard within the City of Irvine. The station receives power from Southern California Edison (Edison) , which requires dedication of a power easement for that service. Within our fee-owned parcel, Edison is requesting an 11 ' by 6 ' power easement and a 19' by 18' pad for the voltage transformer. The recommended action is to adopt a resolution authorizing the General Manager to execute the grant of easement to Southern California Edison Company for the necessary power easement in a form approved by General Counsel. -12- `� November 18 , 1992 ALL DISTRICTS 11: REPORT ON NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (NWRI) . Past Joint Chairman A. B. "Buck" Catlin, the Districts' representative on the National Water Research Institute board of directors will present a verbal report on the accomplishments of the Institute. The Districts are one of five agencies that formed NWRI to conduct multi-disciplinary water quality research and associated activities with the goal of protecting and enhancing water resources. The administrative functions are financed by the five member agencies and the research work is funded by Joan Irvine Smith. 12: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE AND FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEES. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on October 21 , 1992 and the Executive Committee met on October 28, 1992. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on the Committees , deliberations and recommended actions for consideration by the Boards. \� 13 : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE. The Building Committee met on October 29, 1992. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on the Committee' s deliberations and its recommended actions for consideration by the Boards. 14: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. J. Wayne Sylvester General Manager -13- RE: AGENDA ITEM N0 , 12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS 4f ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1ID644 ELLI6 AVENUE October 28, 1992 2n 80x912, FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92720.8121 014)962.2411 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: October zu, ivvz 5:9 p.m. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Director Fred Barrera Evelyn Hart Vice Joint Chairman Director John Collins Buck Catlin Past Joint Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Counsel Norman E. Culver Past Joint Chairman Greg Beshouri , AETC Dan Griset Chairman, District 1 Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 2 Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 STAFF: Ruthelyn Plummer Chairman, District 5 James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Charles E. Puckett Chairman, District 7 Blake Anderson, Director of Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Technical Services John M. Gullixson Chairman, District 13 Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Gary Hasenstab, Director of Don Roth County Supervisor Personnel Gary Streed, Director of Finance Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Absent: Maintenance Bob Oaten, Assistant Director Roger Stanton County Supervisor of Operations Ed Torres, Air Quality Manager 1) Report and Recommendations of the Fiscal Policy Committee. The Fiscal Policy Committee met on October 21st and considered several items of business. Enclosed is a copy of the Committee's report on their deliberations. The Executive Committee reviewed the following items: A. Results of Ne otiations re Reimbursement for Errors and Omissions hange Orders on Lonstruction Projects. At the September Joint Board meeting, the Boards asked staff to report back to the Directors on negotiations with consulting design engineers pertaining to reimbursement for design errors and omissions for certain specified items on construction change orders on four contracts. (1 of 4) Executive Committee Report October 28, 1992 Following a discussion of the enclosed staff report entitled "Results of Negotiations re Reimbursement for Errors and Omissions Change Orders", the Committee approved the report. B. Review of Construction Project Change Order Practices. Staff reported that in response to the recent discussions and concerns expressed by Directors regarding construction contract change orders, a detailed report describing the Districts' policies, procedures and practices pertaining to such change orders had been prepared with the hope that it would be helpful to the Board Members. Following a discussion of the report, it was the consensus that the Districts' construction management practices were appropriate and effective. 2) Air Quality Compliance Issues. A. Compliance with AB 2588 Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Notification Obligations. Utilizing the attached outline, the staff reviewed the enclosed separate staff report (gray) outlining the requirements for the .... Districts to comply with the AB 2588 Air Toxics "Hot Spots" public notification requirements. Following the review and Committee discussion, staff was directed to proceed with the proposed compliance actions regarding public notification obligations under AB 2588, as described in the report. B. Authorization to Conduct Biofiltration Demonstration Project and Enter Into Grant Agreements with SCAQMD and WERF for Partial Funding. The Districts are faced with complying with new and evolving local , state and federal regulations that will limit the amount of toxic and volatile organic emissions from our treatment plant. Within a couple of years we will be required to develop a risk reduction plan and implement control strategies to achieve specified emission reductions. Staff has identified biofiltration as a promising technology to cost-effectively achieve required emission reductions. However, this technology must be proven before it can be applied at our facilities or other treatment plants. Staff reported that it is therefore recommending that a biofiltration demonstration project be conducted; and reviewed with the Directors the enclosed (tan) separate staff report describing the proposed project, utilizing the attached outline. (2 of 4) • Executive Committee Report October 28, 1992 Staff further reported that concurrently with the investigation of new technologies to meet increasingly stringent emission standards, at the urging of the Directors staff has been seeking outside funding sources for studying new technologies. A favorable response has been received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) for grant monies to partially fund the proposed biofiltration demonstration project. Estimated cost sharing would be as follows: SOURCE AMOUNT SCAQMD 124,568 WERF 30,000 CSDOC 125,432 Total $280,000 Southern California Edison has also indicated an interest and may fund up to $50,000, in which case the Sanitation Districts' funding level would be reduced to as low as $76,000. Executive Committee Recommendation: Following a discussion by the Directors, the Committee recommended the following actions: 1. Authorize staff to conduct the biofiltration demonstration project to study the performance of biofilters for treating toxic, volatile organic and odorous compounds from our off-gases. 2. Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with USC for services pertaining to the biofiltration demonstration project, in an amount not to exceed $80,800. 3. Authorize staff to secure the services of construction contractors in accordance with established procurement procedures, to construct the necessary support facilities to conduct pilot testing of the biofiltration demonstration project (estimated amount is $25,000). 4. Authorize staff to secure the services of contract analytical laboratories, in accordance with established procurement procedures, to conduct the necessary testing pertaining to the biofiltration demonstration project (estimated amount is $65,000). 5. Authorize staff to enter into a grant agreement with South Coast Air Quality Management District for partial funding of the biofiltration demonstration project in the amount of $124,568. (3 of 4) Executive Committee Report , October 28, 1992 6. Authorize staff to enter into a grant agreement with the Water Environment Research Foundation for partial funding of the biofiltration demonstration project in the amount of $50,000. Staff will report back to the Directors on the outcome of the grant applications with SCAQMD, WERF and SCE prior to proceeding with the biofiltration demonstration project. 3) Closed Session. The Committee concurred in closed session to consider reports and recommendations of staff and counsel pertaining to a matter of pending litigation. JWS:sc Enclosures L/ (4 of 4) COUNTY SANITATION Dumas October 22, 1992 W ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFONNIA 1 e EW AWE vo WT9+n i WMN VAI ..MMR"WR lF) n1.Mz 11 REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE Meetino Date: October 21, 1992 FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT: Charles E. Puckett, Chairman William Mahoney, Joint Chairman James V. Evans Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel John Gullixson Peggy McBride, KPMG Peat Marwick Evelyn Hart Steve Sardegna, KPMG Peat Marwick Iry Pickler Cody Press, Merrill Lynch Peer Swan Melissa Waters, Merrill Lynch James Wahner John Coan, PaineWebber Grace Winchell STAFF PRESENT: ABSENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Don Griffin Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance Blake Anderson, Director of Technical Services Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of Maintenance Dan Dillon, Accounting Manager Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager 1. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN DAILY EFFORT IPRIDE). The Committee reviewed the enclosed staff report (lavender) summarizing several PRIDE proposals evaluated over the past few months. Cash awards totaling $9,123.00 and Certificates of Commendation were approved for the 15 PRIDE proposals estimated to save approximately $190,000.00. Those employees earning the maximum $1,500.00 award will be recognized at the November Board meeting. 2. ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT AND MANAGEMENT LETTER FOR YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1992. Staff reviewed the draft Audit Report for the year ended June 30, 1992 and noted that once again the auditor's opinion expressed no defects in procedures or control. \. wl Letters to the Boards, reporting compliance with all COP issue covenants and petty cash policies, were included with the Annual Audit Report. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 2 October 22, 1992 Peggy McBride, the Audit Partner from KPMG Peat Marwick, reviewed the conduct �.✓ of the audit and the results. She reported that this year's audit was the smoothest in her experience with the Districts, that no significant audit adjustments were proposed and that the 1991-92 Audit Report and Financial Reports were consistent with the prior year. Steve Sardegna, Audit Manager, discussed the Management Letter and staff's response. He noted that these were not major concerns, but were areas of recommended policy and procedural changes that the Directors should be aware of. The Audit Report will be mailed by KPMG Peat Marwick directly to the Board members for consideration at the November regular meeting. 3. INTEREST RATE MONITORING/SUMMARY OF SWAP EARNINGS. The financing team gave a report on the interest cost and investment earnings of the 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program, Series A, B and C Certificates of Participation (COP) issues to the Directors. The attached staff report (pink) provides the details for the following summary and presents the three-year SWAP earnings and reversal analysis: Total Net True COP Interest Interest Interest Interest ISSUE Paid Earned Earnings Cost SERIES A $ 6,034,981 $ 9,039,677 $ 3,004,786 (1.5884%) SERIES 11 ,558,791 9,639,910 (1,918,881) 1.1895% SERIES C 318.620 538.689 220,069 (5.8847%1 COMBINED $17,912,302 $19,218.276 $ 1 .305.974 (1.8941°�) 4. STATUS OF SWAP REVERSAL. On September 28, 1992, the Fiscal Policy Committee considered whether Districts 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 should remain in the Series B 3-year SWAP transaction, or whether the Districts should capture the current high reversal profit by entering a reversal SWAP transaction. At the meeting the Committee directed the financing team to negotiate a reversal of the existing 3-year SWAP, when appropriate, subsequent to the release of the latest unemployment figures, with the concurrence of the Chairman of the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Joint Chairman. The Joint Boards, at the October 14th meeting, ratified the Fiscal Policy Committee's action and the financing team began the necessary steps to implement the reversal SWAP. Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 3 October 22, 1992 The financing team gave a brief status presentation on the reversal SWAP and the market to the Committee, noting that the market has behaved somewhat adversely during this process, and the Committee further directed staff to execute the reversal if total projected profits exceed $7,000,000 or fall below $6,000,000, The total projected profits as of the meeting date are $6,684,000. 5. REFUNDING OF CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, 1992 SERIES. At the October 14th meeting, the Boards approved the Fiscal Policy and Executive Committees' recommendation to authorize a financing team consisting of PaineWebber, Underwriter; Mudge Rose and Rourke & Woodruff, Co-special Counsel; Orrick Herrington and Sutcliffe, Underwriter's Counsel; and staff, to conduct an advanced refunding of certain COPS. The refunding of Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series, includes Districts 1, 2 and 3 1986 $117 million COP issue, and one term bond of the 1991 Series B COP issue of Districts 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 . The restructuring was proposed because it could potentially save the Districts a considerable amount of interest expense while improving some provisions of the indentures. The Joint Boards authorized the financing team to determine and implement the best combination of debt financing alternatives to obtain the most favorable terms and conditions for the advance refunding, based on the market conditions. Staff and the underwriter updated the Committee on the status of the COP issue and concurrent long-term SWAP including ongoing negotiations, the target interest rates, and the potential issue dates. The Committee and the financing team discussed the particular interest rate sensitivity of this issue and reviewed the enclosed schedule of Reversal SWAP rates (yellow). The Committee directed staff to continue to monitor the prospective refunding rates while completing the remainder of the negotiations and to target the issue below a 5.60% Reversal SWAP rate. 6. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS. A. Results of Negotiations re Reimbursement for Errors and Omissions Change Orders on Construction Pro i acts. At the September Joint Board meeting, the Boards asked staff to report back to the Directors on negotiations with consulting design engineers pertaining to reimbursement for design errors and omissions for certain specified items on construction change orders on four contracts. The Committee reviewed the enclosed staff report entitled "Results of Negotiations re Reimbursement for Errors and Omissions on Change Orders" and recommends approval. 4 Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee Page 4 October 22, 1992 ` B. Review of Construction Proiect Chanoe Order Practices. Staff reported that in response to the recent discussions and concerns expressed by Directors regarding construction contract change orders, a detailed report describing the Districts' policies, procedures and practices pertaining to such change orders had been prepared with the hope that it would be helpful to the Board Members. Following a review of the report it was the consensus of the Committee that the Districts' construction management practices were very effective, and the Committee concurred with staff that the report should be reviewed with the Directors at the Executive Committee meeting and at the regular Joint Board meeting in November. JWS:lc KF:RFPC10.21 Enclosures COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS m ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA October 14, 1992 1(IB ELLIS AVENUE G 0 BOx 127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.,CALIFORNIAOPN 92]2BR12] STAFF REPORT P14191 Proposed PRIDE Awards During the past few months, several Personal Responsibility in Daily Effort (PRIDE) proposals have been evaluated. Following is a summary of those safety or cost- saving proposals that staff recommends for certificates and cash awards, in accordance with the Board approved PRIDE program. These 15 PRIDE proposals are estimated to save the Districts over $190,000 and the awards total $9,123.00. PRIDE No 125 - Underground Emergency Location and Identification. This is a safety suggestion which has resulted in the labeling of the utility system lines within the tunnels throughout the plants. This should allow an easier and faster identification and response to problems that may occur, saving time and limiting damage. The minimum safety award of $100.00 is recommended. PRIDE No. 178 - Distribution of Filtrate Solids. This suggestion to reroute the filtrate solids from the dewatering facility to the solids digestion system and back to the primary basins has the effect of increasing primary capacity and improving retention time. The results are an estimated $44,400.00 annual savings in chemicals, improved treatment and increased digester gas production. Staff recommends the maximum award of $1,500.00. PRIDE No. 212 - Lock-Out Switch for Screen Pump and Catwalk. This PRIDE suggestion is estimated to save $13,345.00 annually from the installation of equipment stop devices on the primary basin catwalks, These devices will prevent damage to basin skimming equipment, saving repair labor and materials while improving reliability. The award of 10% of the annual savings is recommended, in the amount of $1,335.00. PRIDE No. 215 - Activated Sludae Plant Power Reduction. Reconfiguring the Plant 2 Activated Sludge Plant to allow the rerouting of flows between the east and west reactors will result in more efficient utilization of the equipment and reduced electrical power requirements. The first year savings from this suggestion are estimated to be $80,000.00 and the maximum $1,500.00 award is recommended. Proposed PRIDE Awards Page 2 October 14, 1992 ' PRIDE No. 217 - Magnetic Starters for Control Launder Valve Motor. Implementation of this suggestion has reduced the failure rate of the motors that control the launder valves on the primary basins by preventing the simultaneous starting of the forward and reverse relays. Staff recommends an award of $924.00, 10% of the first year savings, to be shared by the six employees who submitted this suggestion. PRIDE No. 219 - Activated Sludge Plant Flow Optimization. This suggestion has resulted in the reduction of flow to the Activated Sludge Plant by reducing the DAF recirculation flow that was recycled through the Activated Sludge Plant influent wet well; also reducing the power required for pumping. The annual savings are estimated to be $8,427.00 and an award of $843.00 is recommended. PRIDE No. 221 - In-Line Ferrous Filter. This suggestion is to install a clear filter on the lines from the ferrous chloride pumping station prior to the meters which have periodically plugged. Use of these filters will delay the plugging while allowing the operators to view the ferrous chloride batches. Repair, maintenance and operations labor savings are estimated to be $1,000.00 each year and, therefore, a $100.00 award is proposed. PRIDE No 222 - Grit Screw Conveyor Switch Relocation. Relocation of the switch to operate the grit screw conveyor to a more convenient and accessible location has been considered a safety suggestion and the $100.00 minimum award is recommended. PRIDE No. 223 - Area Safety Lighting for Chlorine Delivery. This safety suggestion has resulted in the installation of a light over the chlorine delivery truck to assist the driver and operators in the safe handling of this chemical. The safety award of $100.00 is recommended. PRIDE No 224 Valve Stem Protection Caps Stem Activated Sludge Plant. This is suggestion to cover the pointed stem end of the knife gate valves at the Activated Sludge Plant to reduce the likelihood of injury to the Operations and Maintenance staff. A $100.00 safety award is proposed. Proposed PRIDE Awards Page 3 October 14, 1992 PRIDE No. 227 - Green Acres/City Water Use Reduction. Either Green Acres Project or City water is used to keep the polymer lines clear at the new P1-33 primary treatment facilities. This proposal to reduce, automate and regulate the flushing process from continual flushing to as- needed flushing is estimated to save $1,709.00 a year after amortization of implementation costs. Therefore, a $171 .00, or 10%, award is proposed. PRIDE No. 229 - Wind Direction and Velocity Printout Reduction. Reducing the frequency of wind direction and velocity information printed in a report from every five minutes to three times an hour has resulted in reduced paper use and storage requirements. A $100.00 minimum award is recommended. PRIDE No. 230 - Watch Your Step. This is a safety suggestion to extend and mark a small step outside the belt press building which was a trip and fall hazard. A $100.00 safety award is proposed. PRIDE No. 245 - Extend Laser Printer Toner Cartridge Life. Toner cartridges for laser printers are delivered set at a medium toner disbursement rate. This suggestion to inform all of our users that this rate is adjustable and of the techniques to extend the production from 4,000 pages to 11,000 is estimated to save $6,500.00 annually. A $650.00 award is recommended. PRIDE No. 252 - Ellis Ave. Pump Station Operation. Recently the Sunflower Trunk has been diverted to Plant 1 during the daily low flow period in order to maintain the plant's target operational flows. This diversion will allow us to discontinue the use of pumps at the Ellis Avenue Pump Station thereby reducing costs for flow control by staff, periodic pump station maintenance and power for the pumps. This suggestion is estimated to save in excess of $26,000.00 each year and, therefore, the maximum award of $1,500.00 is recommended. GGS:lc REF:WPDOCS%FPC.MTGIPMDE.SR1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA October 14, 1992 1�FILs aVExuF PO Box 9127 FW WMN VALLEY,CALIFOANM 92729.8127 n1n9922n1 STAFF REPORT 1990-1992 Capital Improvement Program Certificates of Participation Monitoring The Districts' financing team continues to monitor the interest cost and investment interest earnings of the 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program COP issues, including the three-year SWAP transaction. The enclosed schedules show the net interest earnings to date of the Series A and C variable rate COP issues, the reduced interest cost of the Series B fixed rate COP issue and the past and potential earnings of the SWAP. SERIES A. B AND C NET INTEREST COST SUMMARY The Estimated Series A Net Debt Service to Date schedule (blue) indicates that while the variable daily interest rate paid by the Districts since December 1990 has ranged from 1.00% to 9.75%, the average has been 3.24%. Overall interest earnings on the Series A proceeds, including the reimbursement amount for 1989-90 improvements, on deposit with the Orange County Treasurer, continue to exceed interest costs, resulting in a net positive cash flow. The Estimated Series B Net Debt Service to Date schedule (gold) displays the net interest cost of the fixed rate issue. There are three types of investment earnings on this transaction: Interest earned on unspent proceeds deposited with the Trustee or the County, interest earnings on the ten-year Guaranteed Investment Contract (GIC) for the debt service reserve fund, and net SWAP earnings (discussed below). The Estimated Series C Net Debt Service to Date Schedule (white) indicates that the average variable daily interest rate paid by the Districts since September 1, 1992, has been 2.71 %. Overall interest earnings on Series C proceeds, including the reimbursement amount on deposit with the Orange County Treasurer, as well as earnings on proceeds invested by the Franklin and Fidelity funds, exceed interest costs, resulting in a net positive cash flow. The pertinent interest cost, investment earnings and resulting all-in true interest cost (TIC) figures for each issue and for all issues combined through October 13, 1992, are summarized below: 1990-92 COP Monitoring Page 2 October 14, 1992 COP Total Net True Interest Interest Interest Interest Paid Earned Earninas Cost SERIES A $ 6,034,981 $ 9,039,677 $3,004,786 (1.5884%) SERIES B 11,558,791 9,639,910 (1,918,881) 1.1895% SERIES C 318,620 538.689 220,069 (5,8847%1 COMBINED $17,912,302 $19,218,276 $1,305,974 (1,8941%) SWAP EARNINGS SUMMARY The enclosed Summary of Weekly Analyses (pink) for the Districts' three-year SWAP transaction summarizes that transaction's net profit performance through October 13, 1992. The SWAP has produced net profit to the Districts through October 13, 1992. Column D reports the accumulated net earnings to date while columns E and F report the potential total net earnings. Potential earnings in column E are calculated using the average J. J. Kenny Index from column H and the higher potential earnings reported in column F assume the current, below average, index reported in column G will continue for the remainder of the SWAP. REVERSAL SWAP STATUS The Summary of Reversal SWAP Analyses and the 3-Year SWAP vs. Current Reversal Profits (green) and the Potential Earnings Summary (gray) have been prepared for use in evaluating the termination of the existing SWAP by executing a Reversal SWAP. The reports indicate that the potential profits from a Reversal SWAP are currently $4,028,903, approximately halfway between the expected profits from remaining in the existing SWAP at average rates experienced to date and today's current-low rate. At the last meeting, the Committee directed staff to proceed with a Reversal SWAP as soon as appropriate. Staff and the financing team have monitored market expectations regarding interest rates, actions by the Federal Reserve Board and economic indicator, and are expecting to execute the Reversal SWAP during the week of the Committee meeting. PG:Ic REF:RC.VrMSR 10.21 �/ KRRILL LYNDN A W. Draft Owd $IN,aW,OM Canty Swltstle0 Districts of Oren9e Canty Certificates; of Pertlelptla CePl tel Imwovwwt g Prrw 19%-92 Ear lx 6 ............................................ ESTINIITED STATES A NET DEBT SERVICE TO 067E A B C D E T D N I 6 C L N IMereet Cate I.twnt EArninp ...................................... ............................................................................................... Principal Oocsterdiw Pracee, InSwtd Kith Trustee _-_ Proceeds Imated Nlth Canty___.____ •................... ..................................... .------------------------- Total not Principal An. Perledle IAN9e)t Proceeds An. Peddle A.Isinx Boost A". Periolic Investment Tint C t)/ All-In MUsdiry Vl6(1) Debt Eerda W Trustee Tleld Eemlas Art. N/ Canty Vleld(2) Eernige Eeminp In, EnnfW TIC .............. ....... ............. .............. ....... ............ ......... ... ....... ............ ............... ............. ............. 12/m/% -- 12/31M E1W,000,000 5.8m1 E424,905.00 M8,7M,OM.W 7.50m2M S ,225.W SL9,DDO,OW.00 B.Mm 13W,310.22 E574,035.22 $149,130.22 (1.81322n) 01/01/91 -- 01/31,91 1W,OW,DW 3.1552 262,9W.01) 40.025.00.01) 6.9201 232,476.54 49,880,OW.00 E.8%1 369,52T.67 602,006.21 339.106.21 (4.100511) Swint •- 02/28/91 1W,0W,0W 2.6161 21e.01011.33 35,277,0110.01) 6.5061 191;260.14 49,851),W6.01) E.87m IM,6%.n 559.956.47 341.948.14 (4.1576151) 03/01/91 -- 0/31/91 1W,000,0W 3.TIES 30,6n.W 22,054,000.W 6.3251 116,242.% 49,SO 000.W 9.DOm 374,1W.M 4%,342.% 1M,M796 (2.1966625) O4/01/91 •- 06/30/91 1W,DW,OW 3.Mn 2D0,55D.n 13,046,0W.W 6.105B 66,371.53 49,MO,OW.W 5.61m 357,8l9.W 424,260.53 143,702.19 (1.747t2m) 0/01/91 -- 0/31/91 1W,OW,OW 3.619K 301.616.67 B,WI,OW.W 5.892C 39,2M.91 49,860,000.00 D.54m 3%,979.33 3%,2M.24 92647.55 0.1266711) W 06/01/91 -- 06/30/91 1W, O,OW 3.3651 210,416.67 3,017.000.11D 5.907C 14,851.1E 49,21S0,000.00 m 8.21 341,262.13 356,113.52 75,6%.w (0.9M3731) 071ofni -- 07/31/91 1W,OW,OW 3.S6m 297,175.00 0.00 N/A O.W 49,MD,OW.W 8.12m 337,521.33 331',521.53 40,W.B (0.49055m) 011/01/91 •- M/31/91 i OWDO DID OW 1.19m 324,M6.67 O.W N/A O.W W m 49,MO,000.W B.Itm 337,1W.67 337,tm.67 12,259.W (0.14M1m) 0/01/91 -- W/30/91 IW, ,OW 4.M51 40,416.67 O.W N/A O.W 49,650,000. 8.48 352,485.A 352,4M.33 (52,01.33) 0.6435153 10/01/91 -- 10/31/91 1W,OW,OW 3.Wn 3T,2M.33 0.01) N/S O.W 49,M0,000.W S.13m 337,%v.w 337.937.01) 10,03.67 MINIM) 11/01/91 -- 11/30/91 1W,OW,OW 3.3601 25,6,6M.67 O.W N/A O.W 49,MO,OW.W 8.13m 337,937.W 337.937.W 41,m.n (0.5017921) 12/01/91 •• 12/31/91 1WOW,OW 4.13n 3M,758.33 O.W N/A O.W {9,MO,DOO.W e.ltm 337,105.67 337,105.67 ($652.67) (0.09 %) MOM -- 01/31/92 1W,OW,DW 2.0691 1T,MS.m 0.01) N/A 0.00 49•8801000.W 9.30m 3M,570.W SM,S70.a 214,124.17 (2.6034653) 02/01/92 •• 021n192 1W,W0,000 1.9E93 165,718.39 0.00 N/A 0.01) 4918801000.01) 9.29m 356,1%.33 3M,154.33 220,05.% (2.6M20m) 03101M -- 03/31/92 1DO W) OW 2.M61 23B,W.W O.W M/A O.W 49,MD,OM.W 9.46m 393.220.67 393.220.67 19,376.58 (1.OM141) M/01/92 -- M/30/n IW,OW,OW 3.Mn 30,555.56 O.W N/A O.W 49•MO,OW.W 9.SDm 3M,570.W 3M,570.W 81,014.M (0.9m02m) 05/01/W •- 05/31/92 1W,000,OW 3.1841 265,322.5E O.W N/A O.W 49,MO,000.W 9.15m 3W,335.W ]M,335.W 115,012.42 (1.19m9m) W/01/92 -- W/30/92 1DO ON ON 1.Mn 155,558.11 O.W N/6 0.W 49,860,000.W 1.07m 3T,C 9.67 3TrOW.67 221,451.33 (2.6925541) 07/01/W •- 07/31/92 1W,OW,DW 1.am 150,8W.42 0.DO N/A O.To 4S,No DO 9.Wm 376,1n.33 376,1n.33 225.371.92 (2.74m231) W/01/92 •- W/31/92 1W,WO,DW 2.19m 1M,1%.92 0.W N/A 0.W M W 49, 0,W0. 9.Mm 375,762.67 375,762.67 In:563.T5 (2.34131m) W/011W -- W/30/92 1W,OW,OW =.eMi 240,OW.W O.W N/A O.W 49,M0,000.W 9.Otm 374,515.67 374,515.67 1M515.67 (1.6355321) 10/01/92 -- 10,13/92 1W,OW,OW 2.30t1 M,1%.44 O.W N/A O.W 49,MO,WO.W 9.OIm 162,2%.12 162,2%.12 79.095.6E (0.96IMS) ...-""... ............ ............ ............ ............... .....I....... .-........... 3.240%M.OM,891.22 5924.714.25 M,114,963.M M,039.6T.60 E3,OM,7M.3E 0.5551"%) MERRILL LYNCH S 00. $117,555,000 Draft Dated m 9n Co y Sanitati Districts of Orerg oun e Cty COPS -- Capital lsproveaent Progress t0/17/92 1990-92 Series B ............................................................. ESTIMATED SERIES B NET DEBT SERVICE TO DATE A B C D E F G N 1 J Interest Costs Imeatae0t Earni rya .................................... ..............................---........-----.....................------------- Principal Outstandirg Proceeds Irrvested with Tn tee Proceeds Iro,ested with Canty ------------------------------------ -------------------------------------- .....--------------------.--..-------- Primipal F1aad Periodic Debt Umpent Proceeds Avg. Periodic Reisbursesent Avg. Periodic Outstanding Rate Service w/ Trustee Yield Earnings Ant. w/ County Yield Eamings .................................... ------------------------ ------------ ------------------------- -...._.----- 03/03/92 •• 03/09/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 42,893,663 4.223% 34,742 12,366,000 9.460% 22,439 03/10/92 •• 03/16/92 117,555,000 6.960% 156,SD5 41,679,172 4.223% 33,759 12,368,DDO 9.460% 22,439 03/17/92 •• 03/23/92 117,555,000 6.960% 156,805 41,679,172 4.223% 33,759 12,368,DDO 9.460% 22.439 03/24/92 -- 03/30/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,BOS 37,BSO,240 4.223% 30,682 12,365,000 9.46U% 22,439 03/31/92 -• 04/06/92 117,555,000 6.E60% 134,405 37,880,240 4.088% 29,698 12,368,OOD 9.300% 22,059 04/07/92 •• 04/13/92 117,555,000 6.960% 156,8D5 37,022,901 4.085% 29,026 12,368,DDO 9.300% 22,059 04/14/92 -- 04/20/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 37,022,807 4.088% 29,026 12,366 000 9.300% 22,059 04/21/92 •• 04/27/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 33,696,588 4.088% 26,41a 12,368,000 9.300% 22,059 04/28/92 -• 05/04/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 33,696,595 3.968% 25,642 12,368,ODO 9.I50X 21,703 05/05/92 -- 05/11/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 32,047,512 3.966% 24,387 12,368,000 9.15D% 21,703 05/12/92 -- 05/18/92 117.555,000 6.860% 156,805 32,041.512 3.968% 24,387 12,30,000 9.150% 21,M3 OS/19/92 -- 05/25/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 27,472,264 3.968% 20,906 12,368,000 9.150% 21,703 05/26/92 -- 06/01/92 117,555,000 6.86U% 134,405 27,472,264 3.968% 20,906 12,365,000 9.150% 21, OS 06/02/92 -- 06/03/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 24,605,907 3.884% 18,329 12,368,000 9.07D% 21,514 06109M -- 06/15/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 24,608,907 3.884% 18,329 12,368,000 9.07U% 21,914 06/16/92 -- 06/22/92 117,555,000 6.660% 156,805 24,608,907 3.854% 18,329 12,368,000 9.070% 21,514 06/23/92 •• 06/29/92 117,555,ODO 6.860% 156,805 9,071,269 3.884% 6,756 12,368,000 9.070X 21,514 06/30/92 -- 07/06/92 117,555,ODO 6.860% 156.805 8,542,672 3.525% 5,775 12,368,000 9.050% 21,466 07/07/92 -- 07/13/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 8,542,672 3.525% 5,775 12,368:000 9.050% 21,466 07/14/92 •- 07/20/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,8D5 7,916,590 3.525% 5,352 12,365,000 9.050% 21,466 07/21/92 •• 07/27/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,a05 7,916,590 3.525% 5,352 12,365 000 9.050% 21,466 07/28/92 -- 08/03/92 117,555,000 6.860% 134,405 7,128,113 3.422% 4,678 12,365:000 9.040% 21,442 08/04/92 -- 08/10/92 117,555,000 6.86D% 156,BD5 7,128,713 3.422% 4,678 12,368,000 9.040% 21,442 05/11/92 -- 011/17/92 117,555.000 6.86OX 156,805 6267,762 3.422% 4,113 12,368,000 9.040% 21,442 08/18/92 -• 08/24/92 117,553,000 6.ium 156,805 6:267,762 3.422% 4,113 12,365,000 9.040% 21,42 08/25/92 -- 08/31/92 117,555,000 6.860% 134,4D5 5,692,347 3.422% 3,735 12,368,000 9.040% 21,442 09/01/92 •• 09/07/92 117,555,000 6.860X 156,805 5,692,347 3.162% 3,452 12,365,000 9.010% 21,371 09/06/92 -- 09/14/92 117,555,000 6.960% 156,805 5,692,347 3.162% 3,f52 12,368,000 9.010% 21,371 09/15/92 -- 09/21/92 117,555,000 6.a60% 156,805 5,206,844 3.162% 3,157 12,368.000 9.010% 21,371 09/22/92 -- 09/28/92 117,555,000 6.a6O% 156,805 4,827,958 3.1629 2,927 12366,000 9.01OX 21.371 09/29/92 •• 10/05/92 117,555,000 6.11M 156,805 4,827,958 3.162% 2,927 12:368,000 9.010% 21,371 10/06/92 -- 10/12/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 4,827,958 3.162% 2,927 12,368,000 9.010% 21,371 -... .. ..---..- --- ......--.... $11,558,791 Oe ,750,090 ':Si_555,,m MERRILL LYNCH 8 CO. S117,555,000 Draft Dated Co unty Sanitation Districts of Orange Canty COPS -- Capital Improvement Progres 10/13/92 1M-92 Series B ------------------------------------------------------------- ESTIMATED SERIES B NET DEBT SERVICE TO DATE -- PAGE 2 K L M N 0 P 0 R S Investment Earnings -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------GIC Earrings_________._ - -------------- SNAP - ----- - ____________ Total Net Invested Avg. Reserve Faxi Fleeting Fixed Net Investment Lint Cost)/ All-In Funds TWO In GIC Int. Paid Int. Rer'd Earnings Earnings Int Earnings TIC ____________ _________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ 03/03/92 -- 03/09/92 9,513625 8.010% 14,614 49,331 120,905 71,577 143373 f13432) 0.624526% 03/10/92 -• 03/16/92 9,513:625 8.010% 14,614 59,626 120,9DB 61,282 132:094 (24:711) 1.145925% 03/17/92 -- 03/23/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 63,916 120,9D8 56,993 127,804 (29,001) 1.343368% 03/24/92 -- 03/30/92 9,513,625 8.CIO% 14,614 79,144 120,908 41,764 109,499 f47,306) 2.19%53% 03/31/92 -- 04/06/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 72,709 103,636 30,926 97,298 f37,107) 1.725239% 04/07/92 -- 04/13/92 9,513,625 8.01OX 14,614 72,495 120,908 48,413 114 113 (42,693) 1.954951% 04/14/92 -- 04/20/92 9,913,625 8.010% 14.614 76,356 120,908 44,553 110:252 (46,553) 2.164449% 04/21/92 -- 04/27/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 80,216 120,908 40,692 103,784 (53,022) 2.465193% 04/28/92 -- 05/D4/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 830433 120,9D8 37,475 99435 (57,371) 2.667402% 05/05/92 -- 05/11/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 77,428 120,908 43,480 104:185 (52,620) 2.446527% 05/12/92 -- 05/18/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 77,428 120,908 43,480 104,185 f52.620) 2.446527% 05/19/92 -- 05/25/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 75,283 120,908 45,625 102,848 (53,957) 2.508680X 05/26/92 -- 06/01/92 9,513,625 8.010X 14,614 71,208 103,636 32,428 89,651 (44,754) 2.080781% 06/02/92 -- 06/05/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 66,275 120,908 54.633 - 109,090 f47,715) 2.218478% 06/09/92 -- 06/15/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 56,878 120,905 64.071 118,527 f>0,278) 1.779704% 06/16/92 -- 06/22/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 54,693 120,908 66,215 120,672 (36,133) 1.679982% 06/23/92 -- 06/29/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 55,122 120,908 65,736 105,671 I48,135) 2.237977% 06/30/92 -- 07/06/92 9,513,625 8.010X 14,614 47,401 120,908 73,508 115,363 IN,K2) 1.926513% 07/07/92 -- 07/13/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 39,036 120,908 81,873 123.728 (33,077) 1.537900% 07/14/92 -- 07/20/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 44,827 12D,908 76,082 117,514 (39,292) 1.926825% 07/21/92 -- 07/27/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 49,760 120,908 71,148 112,581 (44,225) 2.056185% 07/28/92 -- 08/03/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 48,902 103,636 54,734 95,468 f38,936) 1.810305% OB/04/92 -- D8/10/92 9,513,625 8.01DX 14,614 49,331 120,905 71,577 112,312 (44,493) 2.066679X 08/11/92 -- 08/17/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 50,832 120,908 70,076 110,246 (46,560) 2.16475D% 08/18/92 -- 08/24/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 50,832 120.908 70,076 110,246 (46 560) 2.164750% 08/25/92 -• 08/31/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 55,122 103,636 48,514 88,306 (46:099) 2.143319X D9/01/92 -- 09/07/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 58,933 120,90E 61,926 101,363 (55,442) 2.577740% 09/08/92 -- 09/14/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 61,127 120,908 59,781 99,218 (57,587) 2.677462% D9/15/92 -- 09/21/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 63,916 120,908 56,993 96,136 (60.670) 2.820787% 09/22/92 -- 09/28/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 71,422 120,908 49,456 88,399 (68 406) 3.180494% 09/29/92 -- 10/05/92 9,513,625 8.010% 140614 72,924 120,903 47,984 86,898 (69:908) 3.250299% 10/06/92 -- 10/12/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 53,192 120,908 67,717 1D6,630 (50,175) 2.332861% ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ - c1_096,087 a=S5_674,334 yS8-912,663 _$3,238,330 $9,639,910 ($1,918_881) _1_13"56% MERRILL LYNCH 6 W. Dceft Rated . . . ........ . . f98,500.ODD 10/13/92 Cemty Senitetiae Districts of anew. Canty CDPs -- CSPitel lWavenet Pro9rda 199a-92 Series C ..................................... ESTIMATED SERIES C MET DEBT SERVICE TO DATE A 9 C D E f 6 H 1 i IT L N Interest Caste Imas.t EerniW ........................................... ..................................................................................................................................... Prfecipsl Outgtarellrg Prasaeh Ilrvested with FrenkliD Pmeels In ted with Fidelity Pracemis Irvestei with CaintY ........................................... ........................................... ........................................... .............. Prircl Del An. Perledic DART IMomew Praeeede An. Periodic Ilmpeet Proceeds A,. Periodic Reinurowevet Avg. Wimlc OuntaMiry Yield Service W Truss. Yield (1) Eernfngs W T.tee Yield (2) Eanins Mt. W Caleney Yield (3) Ignites -- --- 09/01/92 -• 09/30/92 t93,500,00D 2.W% 5236,694 m "a,591 5.545% S1DS,1M S35,AA0,591 3.162E SW,M $10,499,y46 9.010E Sn.m 10/01/92 -• 10/13/92 90,500,000 2.304% 111,%? 35,4A0,591 5.222% n,1M W,AA0,591 3.162E 43,M5 10,499,746 9.010E 33,69A ..... ............ -_-.. ...... ............ 010,6M SM7,36E $lit,1R S111,450 om==ms Mmeswev s® emmav® (1) Avenge Yield Thragh acta0ar 13, 1992. (2) Average Yield Thr-mh September 30, 19D2. (3) Avenge Yield mro gh Septmber 30, 1992. W/01/92 .. W/30/92 rU IL LYN"S W. Draft Dated C90,SW,OW Canty Supitalm Districts Tr spars Canty COPS -- series leprm®ent PreSrr 1990.92 Series C ESTIMATED WHEN C NET Wtt SERVICE W DATE -- PASE 2 N 0 P 0 R S InvVatrrd Eamirys .......................................................... Resern fud Eemir •• Tetel Net Invested A". Reserve Fund Imeatmrt (IM Lank)/ All-In Ftrds Yield (2) Fidelity Eernlrya IM Eerairps TIC ................. .......... ............ ............ ............. ............ W,01M -- W/30/92 59,150,DW 3.162% M,392 SST0,A31 5141,T3D (y.Mt%F?%) 10/01/92 -- 10/13/92 9,930,M 3.1621 11,W2 5160,250 s1D,311 (4.1001631) ............ ............ ............ ............ t16,6W ssm'sW P220,OW •(S.M7161) ( I\ 30c SUMMARY Of o YEAR SWAP ANALYSES A 8 C D E F G H SWAP PAYMENTS ACCRUED CSDOC POTENTIAL POTENTIAL AVERAGE ANALYSIS MADE BY SWAP PAYMENTS NET PROF TI PROEITASSUMING PROFIT CURRENT J.J.KENNY DATE CSDOC TO CSDOC TO DATE AVG. JJK to DATE ASSUMING J.J. KENNY M107181 TO (D=B+q CURRENT JJK PRESENT 07AWN2 (3,230,023.16 4,381,63237 1,151AM.21 4,482,411.43 8,025,818.05 2.64% 4.14% 0211M (3,230,023.16 4,446,072.23 1,216,049.07 4,614,187.12 8246,679S3 2.55% 4.10% QUM (3,484,37582 4,766,790.77 1,282,414.45 4,746,364.00 7,908,089.77 2.70% 4.06% 02f25/92 (3,484,375.82 4,829,94687 1,345571.05 4,950,745.29 8,332,8.59.17 2.52% 4.03% OW/92 (3,485,29939 4,914,225.75 1,428,92.636 4,974,17230 8,862,50656 2.30% 4.00% 03/10/92 (3,485,29939 4,985,937.61 1,500,638.22 5,107,495.84 7,784,7b5.84 2.78% 3.96% 03/17/92 (3,711,876 5,273,959.94 1,562,08337 5,206,503.75 7,343,663.84 2.98% 3.93% 03/24/92 (3,711,876 5,331,127.04 1,619,250.47 5,277,77752 5,768,55554 3.69% 3.91% 03/31/92 (3,711,8765 5,355,835.23 1,643,958.66 5,289,244.46 6,415,969.16 3.39% 3.90% 04/07/92 (3,711,876 5,404,23231 102,355.74 5,35P12.54 6,445509.18 338% 388% 04/14/92 (4,0D7,60336 5,748,57051 1,740,967.15 5,389,095.20 6,062,261.69 3.56% 3.87% 04/21/92 (4,OD7,60336 5,795484.65 1,788,081.29 5,404,446.96 5A94284.78 3.74% 3.87% 04/28/92 (4,OD7,60336 5,836,596.02 1,828,992.66 5,409,022.06 5,366,402.66 3,M 3.87% 05/05/92 (4,OD7,60336 5,874,29852 1,866,695.16 5,41408.43 5,964,025.13 3.61% 3.87% ON1M (4,00760336 5,886,78159 1,879,178.23 5,395,52558 6,232,751.13 3A7% 3.87% 05/19/92 (4,338,958.97 6,296,032.10 1,957,073.13 5,462,27557 6,188,205.07 351% 3.86% 05/26/92 (4,338958.9/ 6,341,862.69 2,002,903.71 5,496,551.45 6,585,74751 332% 3.85% ONO2J92 (4,338,958.97 6,985,581.07 2,046,622.10 5,507,944.97 7,055,35859 3.09% 3.85% 0609/92 (4,A38,958.97 6,429,299.46 2,090,340.49 5,559,647.19 7,939,752.% 2.65% 3.83% 06/16/92 (4,661,636.06 6,816,20230 2,154,566.24 5,631,06536 8,148,530.24 255% 3.81% 0623/92 (4,661,636.06 6,882,567.13 2,220,931.07 5,703,829.19 8,118,110.84 257% 3.79% 06/30/92 (4,661,636.06 6,948,503.99 2,286,867.93 5,7701452 8,823,598.04 2.21% 3.77% 07/07/92 (4,661,636.06 7,022,141.03 2,360,504.97 5,868,281.24 9,589,237.27 1.82% 3.74% 07/14/92 (4,893,988.43 7,336,47257 2,442,484.14 5,973,210.76 9,081,785.28 2.09% 3.71% 07/21M (4,893,988.43 7,412,67655 2,518,688.12 6,052,186.82 8,654,81759 232% 3.69% 07/28,M (4,893,989.43 7,483,960.71 2,589,972.28 6,125,443.67 8,739,435.81 2.28% 3.67% OW04/92 (4,893,988.43 7538,828.61 2,644,840.18 6,M,097.66 8,694,362.08 230% 3.64% 08/11/92 (4,893,998.43 7,61054023 2,716,551.80 6,271987.89 8,574,731.47 2.37% 3.62% 08/18/92 (5,097,09753 7,883,W25 2,786,766.72 6,323,348.71 8,583,844.41 2.37% 3.61% 0825/92 (5,097,09753 7,954,079.91 2,956,98238 6,386,940.41 8,22395939 257% 3.59% 09/01/92 (5,097,09753 8,002,74432 2,905,646.79 6,433503.82 7,716,W.92 2.85% 357% 09/08/92 (5,097,097,53 8,064,830.89 2,967,73336 6,475,058.46 7,726,415.66 2.85% 3.56% 09/15/92 (5,331,986.27 8,359,666.78 3,027,68051 6514,052.18 7,507,668.11 2.98% 3,55% 09/22/92 (5,331,%6 8,41034.29 3,084,848.02 6,549,844.19 6,911,958.72 3.33% 354% 09/29/92 (5,331,986.27 8,466,514.87 3,134528.60 6555,129.01 6,793,379.79 3.40% 3.54% 11V06/92 (5,331,986. 8,514,698.2D 3,182,711.93 6,598,076.00 8,347,819.17 2.487, 352% 10/13/92 (5,331,986. 8,5W60.83 3,250,574.56 6,643,26051 8,572,434.87 235% 351% 3 YEAR SWAP ANALYSIS SUMMARY OF REVERSAL ANALYSES A B C D POTENTIAL CURREM' AVERAGE ANALYSIS DATE REVERSAL PROW REVERSAL RATE 3 YEAR FD[ED PAYOR 5r1/91 to PRESENT 02118,92 2,551,319.52 4.46% 5.22% MOM 2,234,773.08 4.58% 5.22% 03/03,92 2,154,656.68 4.60% 5.19% 0370i92 2,015,772.24 4.66% 5.17% 03117.92 1,511,506.21 487% 5.16% 0324/92 1,578,999.22 4.84% 5.14% 03/31,92 1,849,600.83 4.70% 5.14% 04107M 2,307,661.75 4.49% 5.12% 04/14/92 2,688X4.49 4.31% 5.10% 04/2102 2,441,426.07 4.42% 5.08% 04/2m 2,485,124.45 4.39% 5.06% 05/05,92 2,656,335.51 4.30% 5.05% M202 2,664,237.92 4.29% 5.05% 05/19192 2,902,140.33 4.15% 5.01% 0526y2 2,335,258.47 4.42% 5.01% 06/02,92 2,506,474.80 4.32% 4.98% 06/09i92 2,681,691.12 4.22% 4.98% 06116/92 2,769,727.42 4.17% 4.96% 0623/92 2,725,148.56 4.18% 4.93% 0620/92 2,89703.66 4.09% 4.90% 07/07,92 3,278,899.33 3.88% 4.87% 07/14192 3,500,904.33 3.74% 4.84% 0721,92 3,754,981.00 3.59% 4.81% 072M 3,931,347.35 3.53% 4b0% 08/04,92 3,780,109.75 3.59% 4.80% 08/11g2 4,099,829.18 3A0% 4.8D% MOM 4,130,021.19 3.36% 4.79% 08/25,92 4,047,120.53 3.38% 4.79% 09/01,92 4,055,298.77 3.31% 4.75% 09/08,92 4,558,783.21 3.01% 4.74% 09/15/92 4,441,265.90 3.05% 4.72% 09/mm 4,368,090.40 3.06% 4.69% 09/29,92 4,456,040.30 2.97% 4.68% 10106,92 4,787,898.20 3.02% 4.67% 10/13,92 4,028,903.29 3.15% 4.67% CSDOC 3 Year Swap vs. Current Reversal Profits PROFITS FOR THE PERIOD FROM 10/13/92 THROUGH THE TERMINATION DATE OF 05/07/94. A B C D Assumed Present Value Present Value Present Value Reversal J.J. Kenny Avera a Potential Profits C& 4.67% Reversal Profits Difference 1.500% 6,767,558 4,028,903 2,738,654 2.000% 5,925,444 4,028,903 1,896,541 2.350% (1) 5,335,965 4,028,903 1,307,061 2.500% 5,083,331 4,028,903 1,054,427 3 000% 41241217 4 028 903 21 314 '' „"...,... 31sP.. 0 •I $, .': ,'tiQ�,$i90y3, fi,w.d=,.. 4,02$;9�13.`'t 'r�,C 3500% 3,399,104 4,028,903 (629,800) 4.000% 2,556,990 4,028,903 (1,471,913) 4.500% 1,714,877 4,028,903 (7,314,026) 5.000% 872,763 4,028,903 (3,156,140) 5.500% 30,650 4,028,903 (3,998,253) 6.000% (811,463) 4,028,903 (4,940,367) 6.500% (1,653,577) 4,028,903 (5,682,480) 7.000% (2,495,690) 4,028,903 (6,524,594) (t)Cwren JJ.Kemyrnd" (2)Cwren ReVe w Rate 10/13/92 Potential Earnings Summary 3-Year Series B SWAP A B C D E F Potential Potential Additional Additional Potential Analysis Net Profit Total Profit At Total Profit At Profit At Profit At Reversal Date To Date Average JJK Current JJK Avg JJK Curr JJK Profit n.dud.a el cndudea In I C - B I I D - B I Monthly Recaru 9/10/91 481,170 4,043,207 2,794,658 3,562,037 2,313,488 1,433,672 10/08/92 548,280 3,720,461 4,565,240 3,172,181 4,016,960 1,988,095 11/12/91 693,716 3,880,558 4,709,655 3,186,842 4,015,939 2,505,892 12/10/91 829,134 4,005,842 4,323,756 3,176,708 3,494,622 3,233,444 1/14/92 977,060 4,096,135 8,312,737 3,119,075 7,335,677 3,105,739 2/18/92 1,282,414 4,746,364 7,908,090 3,463,950 6,625,676 2,551,320 3/17/92 1,562,083 5,206,504 7,343,664 3,644,421 5,781,581 1,511,506 4114/92 1,740,967 5,389,095 6,062,262 3,648,128 4,321,295 2,688,224 5/19/92 1,957,073 5,462,275 6,188,205 3,505,202 4,231,132 2,902,140 6/16/92 2,154,566 5,631,065 7,148,530 3,476,499 4,993,964 2,769,727 7/14/92 2,442,484 5,973,211 9,081,785 3,530,727 6,639,301 3,500,904 '/18/92 2,786,767 6,323,349 8,583,844 3,536,582 5,797,077 4,130,021 �/l 5/92 3,027,681 6,514,052 7,507,668 3,486,371 4,479,987 4,441,265 Weekly Reoort: 9/22192 3,084,848 6,549,844 6,911,859 3,464,996 3,827,011 4,368,090 9129/92 3,134,529 6,555,129 6,793,380 3,420,600 3,658,851 4,456,040 10/06/92 3,182,712 6,598,076 8,347,819 3,415,364 5,165,107 4,287,898 10/13/92 3,250,574 6,643,260 8,572,435 3,392,686 5,321,861 4,028,903 SWAP 1.XLS 4:29 PM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS & ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA tOBCC ELLIS AVENUE oa 9UM 6127 October 21 , 1992 FIX1M11N VALLEY CALIFORNIA 92126.8127 014)962-2411 REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION Tracking of the SWAP Interest Rate Date Rate 4/29/92 5.80% 5/6/92 5.70% 6/10/92 5.70% 9/9/92 5.30% 9/23/92 5.30% 10/6/92 5.23% 10/8/92 5.30% 10/13/92 5.35% 10/15/92 5.45% 10/20/92 5.55% Proposed SWAP Interest Rate Target Ceiling: 5.60% COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA • October 15, 1992 t o9AA Fuls AVENUE vn Box Blz> FOONfAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728.B127 `a✓ mA�9Bz.zan STAFF REPORT Review of Construction Contract Change Order Practices I. PREFACE AND SUMMARY Change orders are an integral part in the construction of any project. It matters not whether the project is a highway, a battleship, an office building, a space vehicle, a sewage treatment plant or, perhaps something that everyone can relate to a little easier, the design and building of a personal residence. The fact is, it' s virtually impossible to build anything without some changes. Why is this? Why can' t a project be designed and built without the need to make changes? There are several reasons. Some of the major ones are: (a) actual field or site conditions vary from what was anticipated (this is a frequent cause) ; (b) for a variety of reasons the owner (the person or entity for whom the project is being constructed) decides that a change is desirable, i.e. , new information becomes available, or a change in need from what was originally envisioned takes place between the original planning phase and the construction phase; or that a change would better accommodate a future event, or sometimes it simply looks and is different once it starts to be erected than it was envisioned or looked like on paper, etc; (c) or it is determined that it won't work, be as efficient, or be as safe as originally thought; (d) sometimes changes are "planned," for example, when a specific piece of equipment to be installed is not known until after the project is bid; and (e) human errors are made. Most of the Sanitation Districts projects are considerably different than typical public works jobs such as roads, buildings, water, storm- water, and sewer. The nature of our sewage treatment facilities, currently a more than $1 billion complex, is becoming increasingly sophisticated, consisting of advanced electro-mechanical facilities with bio-chemical processes. The fact that we must modify or construct new facilities and concurrently operate and maintain the treatment plants in compliance with a host of regulatory and other requirements, complicates and exacerbates the design, construction and coordination efforts required, and increases the potential for change orders on our huge public works projects. Nobody likes to have to make changes--for any reason. Nonetheless, we have to acknowledge that they are inevitable. That doesn't mean we have to unequivocally accept the fact, but we do have to realize that they will occur and deal with them, one at a time, as best we can. It is important to note that the Districts' change order experience compares favorably with other agencies. P Every owner establishes policies and procedures to meet their particular needs for addressing change orders. Because very few people have experience in massive, complex construction programs like the Sanitation Districts, the issue of change orders is often misunderstood. The purpose of this report is to help provide a better understanding of the Districts' change order polices and practices, and the reasons therefor. II. BACKGROUND Change order management is an integral part of managing construction contracts responsible for building the Districts' collection, treatment and disposal facilities. While some change orders are planned for in the design process, most are not. Change orders arise for a variety of reasons. Staff has prepared this report to review the construction contract change order practices of the County Sanitation Districts, and review typical projects completed by the Districts, comparing our record and results with that experienced by others. For these reasons, this report includes a review of the Districts' design process and the staff that performs this work. This agency has historically contracted most of its design engineering services with private consulting engineering firms, with the Districts' design staff managing the design work including plan review. This practice is believed to be the most efficient and cost-effective way because is avoids the build up of a big staff and the policy has been periodically reviewed and sustained by the Boards. Many large sewering agencies, such as the Los Angeles Sanitation Districts and the City of Los Angeles, have large, in-house design staffs which prepare plans and specifications. While these agencies also use private consultants to prepare plans and specifications, the consultants are mainly used to shave peak work loads. CSDOC has a very small staff and we prepare plans and specifications only for emergencies or very unique projects. CSDOC design staff manages the design and construction of the projects, secures permits and approvals, and provides overall compliance of the projects with the Master Plan, EIRs and regulatory directives. Total expenditures for capital projects currently ranges between $80 and $100 million annually. However, our design staff of seven professional architects and engineers cannot perform in-depth quality assurance program on all these plans. For these reasons, quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) requirements are included in all design contracts with outside consultants. III. CHANGE ORDERS Change orders are a normal part of any large, complex construction project. Change orders are extremely useful for changing contract goals and for managing all Districts' work to maintain operation of the sewerage facilities with the greatest reliability, economy and safety. -2- Background Many steps are involved in preparing and managing a Sanitation Districts construction project. General planning begins with forecast needs based on (a) flow increases and (b) regulatory requirements. General planning leads to the preparation of a Master Plan which identifies and schedules planned projects over a particular period of time. The Sanitation Districts' 1989 Master Plan identifies projected new construction and replacement projects for facilities expansion and Improvement through the year 2020 totaling $1.5 billion. The design of each project starts with the Engineering design staff preparing a scope of work by Engineering design staff with concurrence from Maintenance and Operations staff. This scope of work is used to solicit proposals from qualified consultants who then provide the following: ° Feasibility Studies ° Project Report ° Plans and Specifications ° Construction Assistance o Shop Drawing and Submittal Review ° Training • Start-up Assistance ° Preparation of Operation and Maintenance Manuals. Types of Change Orders Approximately 80% of the consultant's work involves the preparation of the plans and specifications. The remaining work includes providing assistance during the construction period and preparing the other items noted above. For most Districts projects ranging from $5 to $35 million, this process can take many years. Frequently, the time period between project inception to start-up of the facilities can be as long as eight to ten years. In between, circumstances can occur or be discovered which can lead to changes, not all of which can be made without change orders. There are many types or categories of change orders including: ° Design errors. Design errors generally result from mistakes between different sections of the contract documents which conflict with each other or documents that fail to correctly incorporate existing as-built information. • Design omissions. Certain work necessary to complete the construction is omitted from the contract documents. • Changed regulatory requirements. Sometimes changes are made during construction to comply with the latest standards and .codes. ° Work added by Staff. Sometimes, since the construction work takes place several years after the design, additional needs or improved configurations are identified by staff during the construction phase. -3- r Other work not directly related to the project may need to be done because it is most economical to complete with onsite contractors, equipment and labor. Certain changes may be made to accommodate ongoing or future construction identified after the plans and specifications were completed. ° Emergency mer work. Frequently the construction crews are utilized during egencies to repair Districts' facilities or do other work not directly related to the contract. This can be very economical since move-in/move-out costs can be avoided if necessary equipment is available onsite. Unidentified obstructions. Most frequently these are underground obstructions in streets or within the treatment plants, i .e. , underground pipes and/or structures not known to exist at the time of design. ° Bonuses and penalties. To facilitate early start-up or penalize late completion. ° Changes to suit equipment. Our designers are required to a Ccommotlate several manufacturers (two minimum) for equipment. Sometimes, accepted low bid equipment requires accommodation changes. Allowing multiple equipment manufacturers to bid results In overall cost reduction. ° Adtliti ons for other a encies. Frequently, other public agencies and sometimes private ask us to perform added work for which they reimburse the Districts. Appendix 1 gives a more detailed overview of change order types; and Appendix 2, which has been extracted from the General Provisions of the Districts' Plans and Specifications, details payment procedures for extra work. Construction Although there are occasional errors and omissions, the Districts' facilities are well designed and well built. The bottom line is that the Districts facilities effectively perform the necessary function they were intended to perform and enable the Districts to meet regulatory requirements. The Districts have never received a violation of their NPDES permit as a result of construction deficiencies. The Districts' facilities do not fail with the frequency that many agencies experience because of the unique blend of talents brought to each project by Districts' engineering, operations and maintenance personnel and the experienced consultants who perform the design work and provide construction support. Treatment Projects The Districts' wastewater facilities' construction projects are unique when compared to most other public works and general construction -4- projects. The Districts' facilities construction or modification projects must be integrated into the existing treatment plants in a manner that will not interrupt the ongoing operations and treatment of sewage. This is an extremely difficult task to orchestrate. Staff must be assured that the hydraulic (flow) demands on our system will be met and that we are able to maintain process efficiency and control at all times so that we continue to meet the NPDES ocean discharge permit standards for protecting the ocean and air quality. We cannot allow the treatment plants to shut down and cause us to violate environmental standards. As a result, we must often make special accommodations in managing our construction program. In doing this, we have been very successful ; as stated before, we have never received an NPDES permit violation. Within this context, construction of major public works facilities by this agency and others requires the ability to respond to field changes in the most expeditious and economical method. Change orders are a normal , important element of any construction contract. It would be unusual for a major construction contract to be completed without some deviation from the original documents. Table A shows the source of change orders for each of the four jobs the Directors asked to be reviewed. Note that the percentage of actual design omissions and errors is very small in relation to the project's total cost and within ranges well within industry standards. While staff, consultants and the contractors would all prefer error-free jobs, design omissions and errors do not usually represent a large part of the total project cost. It must also be recognized that each of our treatment projects is very �✓ unique in terms of what are generally considered typical public works jobs; i.e. , roads, buildings and water, stormwater and sewers. They are often the first of a kind, and not repeat projects. They are very complex, and encompass hundreds of drawings and pages of specifications. Changes that are not (and sometimes cannot be) anticipated in design, are made during construction. The change-order program is a management tool necessary for total project implementation. Because of the large volume ($80-$100 million per year) of wastewater facilities' construction work, the Directors are presented each month with a variety of change orders. Determination of Value (Change Order Management Procedures) The General Provisions of the Districts' construction specifications, which establish the procedural parameters for the issuance of change orders (Appendix 2) , are designed to keep total project costs to a minimum. Most change orders are based on the following: Labor: State rates, plus insurance, plus 15% for overhead and profit. Materials: Cast plus 15% for overhead and profit. Equipment: State rates (50% of State rates for standby). �J -5- TABLE A Analysis of Reasons for Change Orders Submitted to September 9, 1992 Board .......... ........ ......... ..... .... ...... ....... .......... .... . .. .......... ............... ................................. ...... ......... .. ....... . ........... ............................................................. ... . ... ................................................................. ........m. zT O AM w . PERCENT : PERCENTS VORKNOT MUTRACT UNDIMMEDce st :CQaPLETE - co- .... ..................................-.. ........ .. ........ ..........................�%,.; RELATE D...... ................ . ......... BYRMNER 40MMON5 PAN fAcluTIES CHAMES To PosTRAO J-17 100% $7,090,000 14.99% 3.69%M 1.36% 8.98% 0.76% 0.30% J-19-1 92% $16.410,855 3.90% 0.31% 0,86% 0.31% 0.62% 1.80% PI.34-3 J-21 99% $27,205,378 212% 0.19% 1.30% 0.22% 0.28% 0133% Pl.35-2 P2-42-1 91% $9,369,000 1.72% 0.00% 0.260/6 0.42% 0.70% 0.34% Compared to a 1992 survey of 17 large California contracting agencies reported in the August 1992 Civil Engineering magazine, the Districts' profit and overhead markups are the lowest. The Districts' change order policy, as defined by the General Provisions, does not provide a bonanza for contractors. There is a commonly held perception, probably from the aerospace industry, that contractors bid low hoping to recoup and make huge profits on change orders. This is not possible under the Districts' change order procedures. At best, the change order policies provide a measure to avoid losses and lawsuits which could arise from changed conditions. Our contractors would much prefer not to have change orders. Sometimes, work done under change orders costs less than bid prices would normally generate. This is because bidders generally add a certain amount of contingency in their bids to account for unknown site conditions; such a contingency is not needed by the contractor, who is already familiar with the site, as part of his change order price. At the Districts, this has been proven by adding work under change orders to existing contracts when solicitation of public bids produced costs that staff believed were excessive. Determining the amount a consultant should be charged for extra work because of a change order is also a very difficult task. If an omitted work item is added under change order, it can logically be argued that the consultant did not create extra costs for the Districts if, in fact, adding the omitted work is done at the same cost as it would have been had it been bid. For this reason, in many contracts the Districts bid work under unit prices, and if additional work is done, it is paid at the bid unit price. Districts' staff supports and follows a policy to resolve change orders as quickly as possible. For this reason, the Directors see monthly change orders on their agenda. The Districts' conduct the largest public works program within Orange County, requiring capital expenditures of between $80-$100 million a year for contracts involving the collection, treatment plant and disposal facilities. While expeditious resolution of change orders requires that Directors and staff take more frequent actions and spend more time on change order analyses, the policy is one of the most effective management tools to control change order pricing. It avoids the "growth" of change orders over time and late claims for delays and extended overhead when projects do not proceed on schedule. As the Directors will note from a review of the change orders, most of them seek to avoid time extensions, and it is very rare indeed that extended overhead charges are allowed. This can be attributed to the management practice of paying for changes when they are identified. The Districts' change orders contain one of the following statements to avoid future "growth". "The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change -6- Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order." or: "The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order." Many agencies do not take all change orders to the governing board but, instead, grant staff authorization to issue change orders up to a certain amount (typically $10,000 to $50,000) and only require change orders over that amount to be approved by the board. In fact, such a policy has been suggested by the Directors in the past on several occasions but staff has always resisted it. Staff believes that there is a certain discipline that is brought to the entire change order process by requiring all change orders to be approved by the Boards and will continue to support that practice. IV. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS The Districts' staff would prefer fobs to be completed without change orders, particularly those change orders that result from errors and omissions. Our design consultants share this concern. Change orders do not benefit our contractors and certainly are not a convenient means of managing the work. However, it can be safely said that no amount of effort will - completely eliminate changes on extremely complex jobs nor will extra effort completely eliminate errors and omissions. Because the Districts' small design management staff is not able to provide the full plan check review that some other agencies are providing, we do have a quality assurance program in our design contracts. Our contract documents include the following requirements. Excerpt from the Request for Proposals: "E. ENGINEER CONSULTANT shall maintain in full force and effect standard industry form professional negligence errors and omissions insurance coverage for the benefit of itself and DISTRICT in an amount of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000), in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph. If the policy of insurance is written on a -7- 'claims made' basis, said policy shall be continued in full force and effect at all times during the term of this Agreement and for a period of five (5) years from the date of the completion of the engineering services hereunder. In the event of termination of said policy, ENGINEER CONSULTANT shall obtain continuing insurance coverage for the benefit of DISTRICT for the prior acts or omissions of ENGINEER CONSULTANT during the course of performing services under the terms of this Agreement. Said coverage shall be evidenced by either a new policy evidencing no gap in coverage, or by obtaining separate extended 'tail ' coverage with the present or new carrier. "In the event the present policy of insurance is written on an 'occurrence' basis, said policy shall be continued in full force and effect during the term of this Agreement and for a period of five (5) years following the completion of the services provided for in this Agreement. In the event of termination of said policy, new coverage shall be obtained for the required period to insure for the prior acts of ENGINEER CONSULTANT during the course of performing services under the terms of this Agreement. "ENGINEER CONSULTANT shall provide to DISTRICT a certificate of insurance in a form acceptable to DISTRICT indicating the deductible or self-retention amounts and the expiration date of said policy, and shall provide renewal certificates within ten (10) days after expiration of each policy term. "ENGINEER CONSULTANT shall be responsible for and shall defend and hold harmless and indemnify DISTRICT and all its officers, agents and employees from all costs and claims for damages to real or personal property to any third party resulting from the intentional misconduct or negligence of ENGINEER CONSULTANT, its employees or its agents, in relation to the rendition of services pursuant to this Agreement." Excerpt from the Scope of Work: "QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) "The Consultant shall administer a program of QA procedures for producing quality work. Specific procedures shall cover, but not be limited to, planning, coordination, checking, reviewing, and scheduling the work. "All documents prepared by the Consultant shall be subject to the Consultant's in-house procedures prior to submittal to the Districts for review. Each submittal shall be accompanied by a written statement from the principal-in-charge of the project stating that the documents being submitted have been checked. -8- "Discipline checks shall be made of all design calculations, drawings, specifications, construction cost estimates, and reports. An integrated design review shall be performed for multidisciplinary documents to provide coordination and avoid conflicts In the documents. Checking shall be performed by qualified individuals who are not directly involved in the design or supervision of the work." Professional societies have been most concerned about errors and omissions and have developed standards and guidelines. The American Institute of Architects, in their "Handbook of Professional Practices", sets this standard of quality (the American Society of Civil Engineers has similar language): "Law sets a standard for the performance of architects and indeed all professionals--a standard of reasonable care. ..In performing professional services, the law requires the architect to use ordinary care and skill . Specifically, the architect is required to do what a reasonably prudent architect would do in the same community and be in the same time frame given the same or similar facts and circumstances." The architect' s guidelines go on to state that, "Physicians are not required to guarantee a return to good health or lawyers an acquittal . Similarly, architects are not legally required to guarantee that a building will function perfectly, that its roof will not leak or that the lowest bid will be within budget." The guidelines also add, "Even though the the law sets a standard of reasonable care for professionals, project participants often come to the bargaining table with differing expectations. Many clients do not understand that architects are neither able nor required to perform perfectly (emphasis added). No amount of effort, care and consciousness on the architect's part can foresee every aspect of transforming a design on paper into reality." Professional designers are dedicated and make every effort to do the very best job they can, but this alone will not eliminate errors and omissions. The Districts' construction program involves the creation of custom-made products in the field. Change orders are necessary when foundation, materials, weather, design problems, fabrication and erection difficulties dictate some deviation from the original plan defined by the contract documents. Recent changes required as a result of errors and/or omissions have not been excessive. Table B, which details the change orders on four recently completed, non-related projects designed by four separate consultants, indicates our recent track record regarding errors and omissions. Staff has attempted to gather information from other agencies on frequency of change orders, amount of changes and, particularly, information regarding change orders as a result of errors and omissions. Table C gives the following results of a recent random survey of agencies willing to share their change order experience. -9- TABLE Recent CSDOC Construction Projects I............ . .... ......... ......... 31GINAL. OTAL% . ........... ................................. ... ..... .... .......... ........ .............................. .................... ................. .......... .. .........DOWAACTNO TOR .................- . ......... ......... .......... . ....- P no N --COMMA T 090MIE .... ......................--............ �.. M� -1--l-I........... .........................--- --.. .. ..... ......... .................... ............... .......... ........... -...... .........-. ....... .......... ........................... ....... GRANOEIME11-- .. ....... ............... .. ... ......... .......... .. ...... . ......... 0.06%due to early completion bonus. P11-20/1`11-31 Headworks No.2 $31,458,000 7.73% 2.37% 2.22%due to untoreseen soils and I foundation conditions. 2.71%due to untoreseen subsudece PI-33 Primary Clarifiers $39,657,000 6.62% 1.14% soils condition. No.6.15 1.54%due to added work by other agencies. New 0.83%due to an undisclosed utilities. J-23-1 Operation& Maintenance $3,675,000 4.44% 1.18% 0.89%due to changes required by other Building agencies. 7-11-1 Pump Station 3.48%due to changes requested by 7-11-2 Abandonment& RelDcations $3,104,348 6.56% 0.02% 1 local agencies. 7-11.3 1.96%due to untoresearl obstructions. TABLE C CHANGE ORDER AGENCY EXPERIENCE I 1 California Department of Corrections 3% for same design. `a•✓ 5-10% for custom design. California Water Resources Control 5% allowance for work Board related to project. Environmental Protection Agency 5% allowance for work related to project. LACSD 'In-house' design For projects over $1 million, 4.66%. Corps of Engineers, Portland District About 10%. CALTRANS About 7%. LA Department of Sanitation About 9%. LA Department of Harbors About 10%. CSDOC 5.24%* *Average of last 12 plant projects, with value of $207 million, Including new construction and rehabilitation projects. See attached Table D. It has been our practice that should the added cost of an errors and omissions change order exceed the added value, the consultant is asked to reimburse the Districts the difference. For example, if the error results in removal of completed work, the value of the work removed would be charged to the designer. If it requires added work, some portion of the added cost would be charged to the designer. The Districts' overall experience seems to compare favorably with other agencies doing large public works projects for total change orders executed, including errors and omissions. V. DESIGN DIVISION STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES All construction projects share fundamental objectives. First, the projects must be functional , i.e., designed and built to serve their intended purpose. Assuming that function can be carried out, the second is the total project cost. These costs include the following items: -10- �ABLE D Change Order Summary of Recent Plant Projects .......... ...... ...... ................ -4v�. ................ .-................. ............. ........... .................... ...............-................ . .... .......... .. . . ... .. ...... ....................... .... ............ ............. .......... .. ........... .... ...... ..... .. .. . .. .... ........ .......................................... Q . ..................... -- -.-- : . ....................... ....................................... .... ..... ......... .......... . ......... .. ..%QQ.............. ........... .............. 70744. ARlfJECT ... ....... .................. ....... .............d4BN ......... ...... .......... ...... .. .......... .. E ..................... MW�OSTX -........................ .... ........ -....... .............. .................8EG ...... . ................................. ....... ..... ..... . ........ CLO .1.... .......... .......... - * -i "' VWL .... .........- .............. ........ .. ........ .............. .. ........: .........................-.. Mits ............... ........... . ................................. ......... C A ............................ .. .....................1-1......=.- ........ ..-- --%�. .....................I.........................-..... ..............................-. ....... .......... ...... . ............ ......... .....................-.....-.-..... ......... .................... ...... ................. . .... .. ..... ......... ........... ..... ....... ...... .... ............ . ........ ...... ........ ........ ... ... ........ ......... ............. ............... ...........-.........I............... .. .... ............. ..................... ... ......... ......... --------- .......................... PI.20 $31.458,000 7.73% 1.15% 2,2P% 1.99% 2.37% PI.21 $4.618.000 3.63% 0.00% 0.44% G39% 2.80% P1-33 $39,657,000 6.62% 1.25% 2.71% 1.52% 1,14% P1-34-1 $13,098,000 4.52% 0.85% 0.43% 2.06% 1.18% PI-34-2 $19,085.000 5.58% 1.38% 0.82% 1.16% 2.22% PI-34-3 $27,206,378 2,32% 0.19% 1.30% 0.22% 0.61% P2-28-1 $3,747,747 3.99% 0.00% 0.61% 0.63% 2.76% P2-37 $5,395,000 11A8% 0.18% 2.79% 0.85% 7.35% P242-1 $9.369,000 1,72% O.OD% 0.26% 0.42% 1.04% J-15 $18,476243 3.85% 0.87% 1.68% 0.59% 0.71% J-1 9-1 $15,410,855 3.90% • 0.31% 0,86% 0.31% 2.42% J-19-2 $19.753.000 8.61% • 1.15% 1.78% 3.28% TOTAL $207,273,223 4-�i AVERAGE 5.30% 0.61% 1.38% 0.99% 2.32% STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION o Consultant charges for design • Staff charges for design management e Construction bid price a Staff charges for construction management • Change orders. These costs, to some degree, can be changed by increasing one cost to decrease another. For instance, change orders could hopefully be reduced if staff allocated more resources to plan checking or if additional staff were hired to do plan checking or if some form of value engineering is undertaken. Appendix 3 provides a breakdown of the Engineering Department's Planning and Design Division. Districts' staff averages between two and three hours of plan checking for each 100 hours of consultant design time, low compared to other agencies. For example, one agency we are aware of has one hour of staff time for every five hours of consultant's time. The largest part of the workload assigned to the Planning and Design Division includes management of the preparation of contract documents for all collection system, treatment and disposal projects designed by consultants. Additional functions include the staff work necessary for the acquisition of required easements, projects by developers, annexations, EIR activities for all public agency projects within the Districts' service area, permitting activities, review approvals of design plans for tract sewers, connections to Districts' facilities by others, and various administrative, illustrative, and graphics work. Staff, generally, does not prepare plans and specifications unless the project is of smaller size or emergency in nature. Although the emergency projects, of which there are about one-half dozen per year, are generally bid within staff authority, i.e. , under $25,000, each year staff prepares plans and specifications for two or three projects larger than that amount which require Board approval. Thus, the main activity within our Planning and Design Division is the preparation of the large contracts for plant and collection works. These projects include the addition of new facilities improvements, repair and rehabilitation of older facilities, and treatment expansion facilities. Paralleling this work is the preparation of the necessary master-planning documents which is continuous. These documents become the blueprint for the future sewerage works. Planning activity has been paramount in the Planning and Design Division' s workload. This planning activity has been most successful , to wit the Districts have never received an .NPDES violation because of inadequate or non-existent facilities. Each design contract is managed by a Districts' staff project engineer within the Planning and Design Division of the Engineering Department. The staff engineer is generally managing between 5 and 15 projects at any one time, depending on the size of the projects, as shown in Appendix 3. The in-house responsibilities include review of the consultant's design effort, obtaining review from affected operating departments within the Districts' organization, and securing the necessary permits for the project from the South Coast Air Quality Management District, County and cities, federal and state agencies, �..✓ -11- e the Coastal Commission, the Division of Industrial Safety, and others. Most projects have between 50 and 300 sheets of plans and hundreds of pages of detailed specifications. �...J Plans are reviewed to ensure the best utility information available. All plans are transmitted to utility companies, including power, telephone, cable, gas, oil , water and local sewering agencies as well as others for review. Reviews are made at both the preliminary and final stages. Although the staff overseas and monitors the consulting design engineers' work, our historical practice and staffing levels do not provide for a detailed review of the consultants' designs. To do so would be counter to the Directors' philosophy of minimizing staff and hiring consultants on an as-needed basis to do the design work. After design is completed and plans and specifications are approved by the Boards of Directors, the project is advertised for bids pursuant to the Boards' procurement policy and applicable state laws. During this phase, contractors comments and questions are evaluated and frequently, addenda are issued to clarify questions that arise. The entire design process described above results in a set of plans and specifications with the best information reasonably available and prepared in a cost-effective manner. This set of documents is then considered complete with all known ambiguities answered and is ready for bidding. In some circumstances, better information could be obtained, but the cost may not be beneficial to the total project cost and, thus, the planned use of change orders is an integral part of the design stage to minimize total project cost. An example of this is the preparation of plans and specifications for trunk sewer construction projects. Information regarding existing utilities is gathered from owners and placed on the plans in the locations indicated. Unfortunately, such information is always less than perfect. When it appears that the utility is close to the proposed location of a sewer conduit, staff will hire contractors to excavate and determine the utility's exact location. -The downside of advance excavation is extra move-in/move-out costs and inconvenience to motorists. Unless a utility has the high potential for conflict, the practice has been to solve the conflict problem when the contract is in progress via change order, rather than expose each and every utility prior to the start of construction. Staff believes that this is an economical policy. VI. SELECTION OF DESIGN CONSULTANT The Districts' long-standing policy has been to minimize staffing levels within the Engineering Department as shown in Appendix 3. Accordingly, the Districts contract with consultants for the design of most major projects. (Minor projects, especially projects with a high degree of urgency, are designed in-house.) -12- A design contract starts when staff prepares a scope of work outlining ! the services requested. The scope must be general in nature yet specific enough to allow the consultants to prepare a design proposal fee estimate. Design contracts are awarded in accordance with a procurement policy approved by the Boards of Directors (Selection and Procurement of Engineering and Architectural Services) . Proposals are generally requested from three or more qualified firms. Sometimes, specialized and continuation services are negotiated sole source. The Requests for Proposals require that the consultant respond to the Scope of Work by outlining an approach to the design, information on the design team, and the maximum charge. The Directors authorize the Selection Committee to review the proposals and negotiate a fee for consideration of awarding a design agreement by the full Board(s). The professional services agreement is generally awarded to the firm with the lowest fee proposal . (It should be noted that, based on State laws, many public agencies do not use consultant fees as the basis for awarding professional contracts. Fees are negotiated following selection of the consultant, based solely on qualifications.) Upon receipt of the Selection Committee' s recommendation, the Directors award a professional services agreement and the design begins. Completion of a District project involves many consultants. For instance, in most cases soils consultants are hired separately to provide soils and foundation material information for the design engineers. The construction includes surveyors, also hired by separate bidding. Finally, testing services are provided by labs, also through the bidding process. Bidding of each of these components assures the Districts the lowest cost for these items of work, but leads to more complicated project management for Districts' staff. Conflicts and misunderstandings can arise which the Districts staff note as an error or omission should a change order be necessary to resolve the problem. One might think that agencies that have both design and plan check may be able to avoid some of these difficulties, however our investigations show that does not appear to be the case. Districts' consultants know that to receive a request for proposal they must do quality work and when errors or omissions occur, assist In their resolution without compensation. If the added value of the change is less than the added costs, reimbursement of the difference from the consultant may be appropriate. Because of the anticipation of reduced initial costs and other reasons considered to be in the best public interest, by state law public works construction contracts are awarded to the lowest, bondable bidder. This provision itself increases the risk of disagreements and conflicting interpretations of the contract documents which, like most communication devices, are not perfect. In fact, the very nature of a low bid forces the low bidder to look for possible conflicts which can lead to changes. The design process has to be an efficient and cost-effective communication tool . "Cost-effectiveness" of a design document, while not easily measured, simply means that the engineering effort devoted �.✓ -13- to producing a set of contract documents has to stop at a point beyond 1 which further "perfection" or strengthening of these documents makes no economic sense. Because of this economic reality, all construction cost estimates set aside a certain amount for contingencies (or change orders) during construction. While a considerable amount of engineering work is done during the design phase, not all contingencies can be predicted nor all ambiguities removed to completely eliminate the possibility of errors or omissions being discovered during construction. For this reason, project engineering is less than fully complete at the end of the design phase and some of the engineering effort must go into making final refinements during the construction phase. These refinements, made in the field, in conjunction with the on-going construction and based on the then known construction constraints, are much more cost effective than any attempt to produce a perfect design. It is not simply a matter of paying twice for the same service, but one of cost effectiveness and efficiency in the allocation of resources where they provide the most value in completing the job. The cost of a so-called "perfect" design, which could not in any event be achieved, would be unbearable and unattainable for any owner. VII. CONCLUSION In summary, while the change order costs are understandably difficult to bear, the reality of any construction project which brings together entities with competing interests (owner and contractor) are: 1) the contract documents will inevitably contain errors, omissions, conflicts and ambiguities because of virtual impossibility of achieving perfection; 2) such errors, omissions and ambiguities can be reduced but not eliminated, and then only through the commitment of disproportionate additional costs to the design process; and 3) that such resources are generally more efficiently allocated to the resolution of the problems as they arise during construction. Our change order record compares favorably with that experienced by other agencies. TMD:jt ENG/TMG:SR4 -14- APPENDIX 1 DISCUSSION OF CHANGE ORDERS BY TYPES 1. Work Not Directly Related to the Contract This is always add-on work to the contract for either emergency or other reasons. A. Emergency. Occasionally the need for emergency repair work arises unexpectly when contractors are already at work on the site and in the vicinity. This type of work is assigned to the contractors with the best labor and equipment pool immediately available to do the work. B. Non-Emergency. In most cases this is maintenance or operation-oriented work deemed by staff to be desirable to accommodate ongoing treatment plant operations. The work is assigned to a construction contract to avoid potential conflicts caused by bringing other contractors into the construction contract work area, and to avoid the additional charge of move-in/move-out that would be incurred if a new contractor is brought in. The most pressing reason is to avoid delays or conflicts with the construction contract in progress since claims for overhead extensions would result. Completion of this type of work could possibly be delayed to avoid the issuance of change orders. However, delay often may adversely affect operation of treatment and disposal systems, may cause additional inconvenience by doubling move-in both within the plant or to the motoring public, and may not result in any total project savings. In most cases, staff believes that this work cannot be done at lower cost through bidding since the use of on-site contractor's labor and equipment eliminates the high charges associated with separate contractors, such as contract documents, formal plans and specifications, move-in and move-out. 2. Undisclosed Utilities Undisclosed utilities represent a significant number of change orders and change order items. However, as a percentage of the total project, our experience has been that the changes are not excessive. Undisclosed facilities conflicts are generally caused by incomplete records of facilities built long ago. In the treatment plant, the as-builts belong to the Districts; in the collection system, they belong to the cities and the many public and licensed operators, i.e. , utilities. 1-1 Construction of facilities has been continuous in Fountain Valley Y since the early 1920's and within the Huntington Beach plant since 1952. Undisclosed facilities are encountered because as-built information is sometimes poor on older records. Several factors affect the designers ability to secure correct data, including the availability of good as-built plans and the effort placed to secure the information. The professional engineering services procurement method leads, perhaps indirectly, to problems with undisclosed utilities. Designers know they must be very competitive to obtain Districts contracts and rely on as-built information provided by the Districts and/or local agencies or utility owners and do not allocate resources for independent and exhaustive searches. However, overall , total project costs, i.e., the sum of consulting design and construction management costs, construction and change orders may not be adversely affected. To improve the treatment plant utility information produced from past and future projects, staff has been developing recommendations that will soon come before the Boards that include additional staff to beter record as-built information and a computer-assisted design (CAD) system to log plant utilities. This will not entirely resolve the problem of undisclosed utilities/facilities since many facilities have been in the ground thirty years or more, but the problem can be eventually minimized. 3. Design Changes In this category are two subcategories which may be broadly classified as (a) changes desired and identified after the contract is in place, and (b) design errors. A good analogy for design changes is the addition of a room to a house. Once under construction, new ideas emerge and are incorporated into the work, generally at extra cost. a. Changed Conditions. The majority of design changes are the result of new information such as changed conditions or operational plans identified after design. Construction of a major facility is generally an 8- to 10-year project, starting in the planning phase, continuing to design and finished when the construction contract is accepted by the Districts as complete. These changes are submitted to the Boards of Directors for approval before any authority is granted. In general , the changes come about because once projects are in the construction phase staff can then determine the need for improvements. Most changes are identified to improve the long-term maintenance and operation of the facilities, such as added valves, change in piping to avoid conflicts, adding access doors, changing the location of components for a variety of reasons, etc. b. Design Errors and Omissions. Design errors and omissions are on csidered changes which cost the Districts additional money. An example would be construction of a wall which later has to be cored because an opening was not identified for a pipeline. Staff \� 1-2 and the design engineers share the responsibility for that type of change, and in many cases the consultants pay for the changes other than added value. Whether or not the design engineer reimburses the Districts, the actual change order must be submitted to the Boards of Directors for approval . 4. Other Contract Changes This category includes time extensions, payment of bonuses, charges for liquidated damages and adjustment of the engineer's originally estimated quantities. A contractor is affected by many forces outside of its direct control , Including strikes, weather, equipment suppliers and, most importantly, the Districts' ongoing operational requirements which often do not allow for process equipment access or shutdowns as originally scheduled. These time extensions do not generally result in any added cost. Another type of added work which arises occasionally is work for other agencies. An example would include adding or connecting a sewer lateral for a city in conjunction with a District's collection system sewer project. The Districts would pay the contractor for the change order and then seek reimbursement from the city. This type of change order work is accomplished as a courtesy and helps build good will . The Districts do not normally solicit this extra work but do it by request from the city or agency. Changes that result in extra costs, or deductions, include the payment of bonuses for early completion, now specified in most contracts to help assure that we meet regulatory requirements, or minimize inconveniences to the public; and deductions for late completion (liquidated damages). Both serve as an incentive for timely completion of the work. The adjustment of engineer's estimated quantities to actual quantities, although generally associated with an overall contract price adjustment, are not typically considered as an addition or deduction to the project cost. 5. Change Order Negotiations The attached chart shows the development and resolution of change order issues. Costs and/or time are negotiated between staff and the contractor. Costs are controlled by the General Provisions. They may be based on time and materials, or a negotiated price which is based on time and materials. Overhead/profit of 15% is allowed on labor and materials; equipment is paid at rates determined by the State. State prevailing wage rates are used for estimating labor charges. Time extensions are based on delays in the project's critical path. Most change order items do not have a time extension. 1-3 CHANGE ORDER PROCEDURE Flow Diagram Amoum/Rme Yes ' proved Slag rector A�moum% AmounURms Yes as po etl Shan Prepparare Time girre rin F.C.O. Change prder Engineering Sigrred M Yes F.C.O. Cobrador Yes Change Order Rwiex Yes tr/ Anpup rov ervime0 r General Counsel Field Charge es No No No Order(F.C.O.) No IDEWRFY NEED Prepared by nspecmr Yes No Charge Ober Designer AP by Staff oard board of Contractor Smfl Osdslan Directors to Proceed Yes NEGOTIATE WORK Other as No COST,AND TERMS Oth Yes No No No No CHANGE ORDER DENIAL APPENDIX 2 Excerpts from General Provisions, Section 10, EXTRA WORK: "10-6 EXTRA WORK "A. General "The Districts reserve and shall have the right, when confronted with unpredicted conditions, emergencies, or unforeseen events, to revise the details of the contemplated work or to add work of a different character or function and have the Contractor perform such revised or added work as "Extra Work", when such Extra Work is considered by the Districts to be vitally appurtenant to the satisfactory completion of the Project. "Extra Work" is defined as new or unforeseen work, or added work of a different character or function and for which no basis for payment is prescribed; or that involving revisions of the details of the work in such manner as to render inequitable payment under items upon which the Contractor bid; or that work to be done under "stipulated prices" as given in the bidding schedule. "The signing of the Contract by the Contractor will be deemed to be an agreement on his part to perform Extra Work, as and when ordered by the Engineer. Notice to the sureties on the Contractor' s bonds will not be given unless the estimated total value of the Contract, as changed or supplemented, shall exceed the original total price bid by more than twenty-five percent (25%). "If required Extra Work results in delay to the Contract work, the Contractor will be given an equivalent extension of time. "D. Procedure for Extra Work "1. Upon decision of the Districts to have Extra Work performed, the Engineer will so inform the Contractor, acquainting the Contractor with the essential details of the new work. The Contractor shall thereupon prepare a price for said work based upon an estimate of cost and submit said price and estimate to the Districts whose approval shall be secured before work is started; excepting that the Engineer may, when in the best interests of the Districts, order the Contractor to proceed with the Extra Work in advance of 2-1 submitting the prices and cost estimate. The Districts reserve the right to reject any claims for Extra Work or for additional payment claimed as a result of extending the work under the bid prices which has not been approved by the Engineer in the manner herein provided. 112. Prices for Extra Work shall be prepared by the Contractor in one of the following methods, as requested by the Districts and submitted to the Engineer for approval: "a) For a stated unit price or lump sum amount based upon current prevailing fair prices for materials, labor, plant, overhead and profit. "b) On a direct cost plus a percentage basis (force account by the Contractor). All work done by the Contractor on a cost plus a specified percentage basis will be computed in the manner hereinafter described, and the compensation thus provided shall be accepted as payment in full by the Contractor, and no additional payment will be allowed for use of small tools, which have a replacement value of $500.00 each or less, site superintendent's services, timekeeper's services, pickup or yard trucks, except as specifically essential to the work, nor any other overhead expenses incurred in the prosecution of the force account work. 01) For all materials purchased and used in the specific work, the Contractor will receive the actual cost of such materials, including freight and delivery charges, as shown by original receipted bills, to which will be added an amount equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the sum thereof. It shall be understood, however, that such salvage value as may be agreed upon between the Districts and the Contractor for materials which are not permanently incorporated in the work will be deducted from the total amount as derived above. 112) For all labor, including foremen, engaged in the specific operation, the Contractor will receive the wage prevailing and paid on the Project including fringe benefits for each and every hour that said labor, including foremen, is actually engaged in such work. In addition, the Contractor shall be paid a sum equal to the 2-2 Worker's Compensation Insurance Premiums and the actual cost of Social Security taxes, computed on the base rate for the class of work involved, for the actual amount of the payroll V. involved. The Contractor will be allowed to add fifteen percent (15%) markup to these costs. 113) For any machinery or equipment which is deemed necessary or desirable to use, the Contractor will be allowed a rental price for each and every hour that said machinery or equipment is in use or delayed as a result of the Districts on such worksite. "Equipment charges for Extra Work, or for delays in work, shall be in accordance with the current State of California, Department of Transportation, Division of Construction of Labor Surcharge and Equipment Rental Rates, as follows: "(a) Working Equipment Rates, 100% of the price listed. "(b) Standby Equipment Rates, 50% of the price listed. "No markup percentage for overhead or profit shall be added to the working or standby rates. �..i 113. Labor, materials and equipment may be furnished by the Contractor, Subcontractor, material man or others on the behalf of Contractor to perform the "Extra Work". However, the Districts will deal directly with and make payments to the Contractor. When "Extra Work" paid for on a direct cost plus a specified percentage basis is performed by forces other than the Contractor's organization, the Contractor shall reach agreement with other forces as to the distribution of the payment made by the Districts for such "Extra Work". The specified percentage contained herein shall be the total percentage to be added to the direct cost whether Incurred by the Contractor, Subcontractors, or other forces. 04. Upon receipt of the Contractor's price, the Engineer will make an analysis thereof and adopt one of the following procedures: "a) Accept the Contractor's price for lump sum or unit price amount in the original or amended form and direct the Contractor to proceed with the work; or 2-3 direct the Contractor to perform the work on a cost-plus basis. No claim for "Extra Work" costs shall be valid unless made in writing by the Contractor and approved in writing by the Districts. "b) Have the work performed by the Districts' forces on a separate contract, without undue interference or hindrance to the Contractor and without claim or suit by the Contractor for damages on account thereof." 2-4 .� APPENDIX 3 ❑RGANIZATION CHART TOM DAWES DIR. OF ENG. ADMINISTRATION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND DESIGN JACK VINCENT MGR. OF ENG. 3� DENNIS MAY PAUL MITCHELL GEORGE THUR❑ CHUCK WINSOR SPCL, PROJECTS PLANT DSGN. MGR. ELECTL✓INST. MGR, COLL. DSGN, MGR. CIE � BUD PALM JOHN DETTLE )E PROJECT MGR. PROJECT MGR. WENDY SEVENANDT JIM HARRIS PROJECT MGR, PROJECT MGR. X X w ROGER CARRILL❑ MATTHEW SMITH PROJECT MGR, PROJECT MGR, 0 N DESIGN PROJECT MANAGERS DESIGN RESPONSIBILITIES JAN 1990 - DEC 1992 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D • a • p • u u u • e e • • a • p • u u u • e e a • • • p • u 11 u • c a e n e r r r, 19 r . r r n l r r e fi n I r . • o • • B B • S S S a S B S S S 1 9 S 1 B • B S S B • 91 S S S S B B B S D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o I 1 1 1 1 1 1 : x : x : x : x x 1 x 1 Jim Harris Job No. L VNIM S•eeNpr L.pwienn pl PI.]e ]e w D... OxNNIiry Rullrin•I ..._......_...._ ------- age Hw IM Flail11n p P1 Ptd4] xxpO Cb ..—... . .._..........._..._..._.. S Olpe•Ip•1410 nP1 P1J•'] 24.00 CB' ..._... . Cs MI,W pI Dl9•np•)•rd 9.1 PI P, M1 BOO CS --------Cs MI,•6 el Dbnbr.9 utl 101,PI PIJ63 3.00 CS -cs 0—O Wl Ben,.Sullen.1P] 1is 2000 Cb---CS C-N.P—cenrnin IIS. ]]Op CS- —t9 ..I P— I Oannllon 11.1 is"p— --0 CS Cemnl P—:c.,.,.nn 1'I0.2 ]a oO Cb—-----------------__--_---___________—_— c.nnwcwpl,.o,wm.9.n J'va Lw p_ ---_________p cs ------___________— Electr :efp,ofPunppnrnnP] P2.1.1 x).o0p__.__.______.__._.__.__..__.__.___.... So".. I,WPw1on•112 1`2.x.1 1..00 D...------._..___.__—__.__D c4 c9 R•pl.c•menr of CemplpNeJ MCNloiiry Slol•m P2-1. .DOD- —_._......----.__D P,im•ry Clo ier•16Q7 0 PI Plr31 32,W P p MilcNbraou lmpw•m•m• P1 ]S )OOP- -P Mhcellwou ZZ.— Px'.] I'm P— --p R•b6 el ppnl.r•i.J.R.L.M.N.0 P1'19 IS.w Toll V•lu 2•1.]O Wendy Sevenandt J.1,N.. IIMILI CompmnluJ F•cililin D—Irp 6Y.Ym J-26J 1b0 P .._...._._.__._.... Prlmnv Clorlli—1.21•1 PI PI-]I 32.60 P P D— . —...... .. .. .p AcuOv L..'No.lmp. I,Np PI-0B'1 1.13 P. —P D .. LISlm MbnOwau lmpw•mw,M Pld•'1 1.66 P —P p .—ZooM Mingllwou lmpn•mm1• PI ]9'. 1..16 P I D ul,om Mi•nOwau lmpor.mw• P2�41 6.. P---P p No-.rpml Minnllw.0 lmpor.mlr,lo Px.NJ 12.70 P---PD Pronn Ap•FI,•Pra.n IN 6n1.m MM. PI 316 ]00 P--------- P,eeo.NOFF•Pror.W.: I.lem Me!• P240 1.1 p--------- Wn1•wNp..lo,Dir...l.nv Tm1.6YWr 009 D- b — F¢IIilYlmpronm.nloWS• yUp9rW P6.0 6.00 P F.eIli1Y Impnrem.nl•.rd...I,U.,. P}a 4.60 P HNW.1 DIpn1•ro 1,J.R.L.M.N,0 P2-39 1600 0"Y C.mgeu Ind..02.11 P— Mq.nm•.+10 Ti—k 6.Ne•1 Mml No.1 R-03I 0.09 D— —D Prpn.CWI.R,6.T,U,6 R mw Foo.p M.1 PNt low 1 TeW V/u• y]JI (L) N 0 P.PI•Irrlipq D Owlsn Ln cs c( .rrswp«r - DESIGN 1. JNSIBILITIES JAN 1990 - DEC 1992 i M A M J J A 5 O N D J f M A As J J A 5 0 N D J i M A M J J A S 0 N 0 0 p 0 p 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 p p p 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o I 1 I I I z x x x x x z z z z x z Chuck Winsor JPb No. IMID cpnecl-system.ID,th-werM P,pq.Dot,) ...It- _._..........0 e,mam,. JObe,.I-Sswe, 2.2e "to D-. _too t_......_._...._D CS -...................__._...__. _. CS M.m.,r L.rw m1mcocts,sew., 2.30 3A) D--- ..._....___.._._...._..._.........._. ._._...._D cs. toot..__.............. MW.,.o,wq.001n.ARUW Se-1. 2.6.x 0". lememminl.,amol servo 3-262 0.)bD... ....._-----............__........_...__............................._..............D cs. ......_....................__........__............_.._cS o.wgnw..am SWIn Post,Sown 3.26 1.,.D... __........____ my, to 0uu,some 9 Rocky P,,Pwnp$meow 6.32 042 D_ _ ___��. _��.��__...__....._._...._...___._..._......._..._.._.......toot.._.D cs toot.. Imww.m.nu ID Set,.-p.P-P SMnon 633 1.3. D_ ---- 0 Cs _... Imwm'.1D 0eyae.01.llu sewn.Ph.2 .312 2.3)D- -.-.---_D cY .------__._cs Imw.•.1D a.Yae.O,.nvk$.wort Pn.3 5.Se.3 ..oa 0__.___________p CS, ------cs SaNh Lav,iruN$ewer.T.I fid6�1 1.00 M -09 ._h Cost, Sew.,,Ph.2 fi�Obd 1]6 D D L,pW Cer.Puns SLm- fide 1.00 D --0 ABwrem 0 P,SM.e,Tulm NIIN ).le 2-06 P......_.......... . . .. ......._.. .............. ._._... .. ...... ._toot A6tnem RN Ph-1 0.10 D... ..._.._.. ._.._.........-0 CS -... ALx4m Res NM P.S.Phw2 ).le-1�2 0.13 L.mm N.ryM.Sower St.- ).le 0.11 mp,oumere.......11.e1 Pun031Nim ).l-1 0]6 P- ... --P Ses.e.-Der.C-fts Ar.3WNui"oh' Tell 11- ]L00 John Dettle Jebxt. iMlu ROheD of CYprv.eve.S.".Awe' 2.9-R1 210 0---- ReDlntoYas.PS.PMmouch.Abagpmp bD O.Ib P---- -- -P D- ---- 51u]y,pA6Wonl1 7-1.1 0.0. P- -----P RMou,nn.101.In SIDhen at Del.Ch.-I 7l0d 0.20 P-- - ----p rr-Policy,t 3tlel"Rail Awn 1�3E2 0.24 D- Impwemem.1....S11.1P-P Sttllm 171 ..1. D- "so.DIPntimelOrry.pNbr3.wn )-O 0A6 1----- O'l.PwkA-Awn th"Ism 1�10 0.60 D---- C me-NLLAwnst.- 1�1p 0so D------ ehWmNevYweYPunPSlNim 720 1.14 P- -P D- T.<.I....asm 12. ..1. P f I.,.Sown Mh.p P -P PIochowe Lme.LW 51 to N.w1eN 1,- 200 P- Tptl Vlu 10,30 (V W 0 D PI.nN q N D. -.oleo cs-OonvuPOm sweD,e DESIGN RESPONSIBILITIES JAN 1990 - DEC 1992 J F M A M J J A 6 O N D J F M A M J l A B 0 N D J F M A M l J A s D N D r r n 6 . e n 1 e r 1 V . [ [ r 11 1 P r • e n e 1 1 Y . 1 F e r [ • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 • • • • • • 0 • 0 • • 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 } } } } 3 } Roger Carrillo JaC Now F MIL1 Rwl Suenaa In cen.Den.at P+ 0.12 D- --------0 Dlrglnlwip.Iw Aemlrmnni..Fnxllee Mw2 D-----------D cs -- SeMm1a 51ufY fNrmnl.I MVc lmperemem. PL343 D.}I D-------------0 Sebm1e 51ufY FNmem el Mbw lmpwremem. P}JY} 0.3. D— --0 Selemle Re11o111.1 B&C N.MworY. 1`3�434-0 I.... D- --..______._.0 Owre0aln Cemn fe1w1w.1 PI-1 N.2 P2Q3-6.1 2.00 D— --D w«eFVr aYN n Rvn...3 P2 36 2 2.00 D--------------— __________ MJlyenwvOWp.elPlwx3 P2 36 3364 3.W D— Cma Mwq.mw10111e n PS P2-366 1.60 .0aMta.1C 1-.1 l.Impa,at P, P3 11116 2.OD D— MAd 6 cmr.rMw of f.M.N"I P1 J-2, OAO D— New Pneanxl-. n Pl.M Ne.1 J-21 0.•0 P —P p Deme MRemwMOl ,WL&a 0lEp.tl P3 YT OJO P------------------------ M6cR.vitlen[eCen.Mld M039 0.12 0— --006 D.IoneH Mw Pu•Wner s.nem Ip Ld M00• CanVq CwN.r/06M BYMiry at PI l-2}1 160 CL Tae1 VYu 39.69 Matthew Smith Jd No. 2IM1LI wMe1Y CINllne le.2}n PI PI.32 32... RMdnR.u.n el PlMo.anir..".at Pl 1,141 2.W P------- R.ndelPlMwcl.ONnDwu0nP2 P24e em fa-------- 3e1.mmRnl.0lelIM-1 wn Pl P1ae-1.1 ..Go la—------ .—I.RmmN.I Oec wdwM. P2432 1 10.06 o------- Za—ReVo"I.I01rw1ve.elP2 P243d-2 0.00 P— .—M,R1n P1w1w 1`2J3 2 0.60 CS -- Imluwl s.mpel. 0.26 D——O M-- TMYVeIue Moo (J P.%er[r1y D oe F N cs.c� l/ i DESIGN it ONSIBILITIES , JAN 1990 - DEC 1992 J f M A M J J A 0 O N D l F M A M J J A 6 0 N D J F M A M J J A ] O N 0 P r11 n e , r n 1 0 r 1 v a n 6 r , r • 1 0 r v • n 6 , r n 1 0 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 o e o Y 6 6 p Y 0 0 p G 0 D a 0 D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o t t t t 1 1 + i t t + + : z x x 3 : z z z z z z Bud Palmquist Job No. F Wlu Mee.1.Bu.0 Anwv.,M.T1. 1.10 080 Soli.11.1 Sail,".arm.A.1.1...Pole 231 ].00 P._........__._........._......____..............__.__.._.................P nA..I slat Be..pile.Im.rt.Me,Lw., 3"0 Dn P—._._......_._.________..._.........._........_........__.._.PO i.AIR ... ...._...................................—__ Mal TA.Sl Avn e Or.,NM nrPo An 3.]6R M. P--........_ ._._..........................................._.P 0... ..._.........__........................—_.... PI.n.01 S...'IPCN ar.vlt,sewed 6.3)J>a 3.00 P........_.___................._.__.._...____..._._._.____P D._ 61PMn n Pnga.W Cron 11 S.A.Rlv.r 6..116 S 638 1.65 D .-D Mee.D1.1.State APM1pn 6 Riler]Ipwn x Ploln t 6d0 ].O D--------------0 FAAR,.11.1 Se—, p�li 31,0 D- - — Mof.to Sail"...rinl.rnptar Linda,R.A.Rlvol b41-0 OAx D— --0 nNpullenel Ml[iholvo no 6utlm hlld IAp 0— ----0 .—Itre Cott-Se—"A" ,'an )46 0.15 D -.0 PueM1m Lim,LA.St o Rommel IL P P Slate,Ave,P.S. ILl) 1260 0 6.4np1.1v my Slenen.0..m'n1..S-chop Cnolnal M.1.IA.1 0.30 D— -----'-D 9.,101.1.r 1 m.,eaN,..—R M.Firs... I..l.u.z 2w0 0_. __.—�___� _p fiappi Palette MrrN N�p.r.Ap CM1.I.fn N LIM] 13.10 D Y n C Tr. %ebm D Te1Y V.lu 41.33 W D P.Pl.mlrq p.ppyn N Cs-CRhaeaoal Rea l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Al ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA + October 15, 1992 10W EWa AVENUE *o.au.a+a� STAFF REPORT 10UNEAIN VAULEV.CAUFORNIA 9272a.8137 nlu Uaa411 Results of Ne otiations re Reimbursement for rrors an ssions C ange Urcrers I. PREFACE At the regular Board Meeting of September 9, 1992, the Directors requested a report from staff discussing the results of change order reimbursement negotiations with professional engineers responsible for the preparation of design plans and specifications on four treatment plant construction projects. As part of staff's report on change orders to the Directors, change order items which involve errors and omissions are routinely noted in the General Manager's Agenda Report. The Manager's Agenda Report for September 9 noted that certain change order items on the four projects were determined by staff to be the result of consultant errors and omissions. The Directors added other items to be considered and requested that a report be submitted to the Fiscal Policy Committee and, ultimately, to the Boards of Directors giving the results of staff's negotiations with the consultants. II. RESULTS �..� Table 1 gives the results of staff analysis and negotiations. TABLE 1 9/9/92 Agenda Reimbursement Reimbursement Item No. and Change Order/ Recommended Agreed to by (Job No.) Items Nos. by Staff Consultant 9(c) C.O. 12: 1, 3, Job No. J-17 7, 10, 11, 12 and 13 (add 5*, 6*, 8* and 9*) $8,476.00 $8,476.00 9(d) C.O. 13: 5 Job No. J-19-1 (add 1*, 2*, 3* and 4*) 39148.14 3,148.14 9(e) C.O. 13 (add Job No. P1-34-3 1* and 2*) 456.00 456.00 9(f) C.O. 5: 2, 3 Job No. P2-42-1 and 6 (add 5*) 2,313.25 2,131.25 *Change order items added by Directors for consideration of partial reimbursement by designers. Appendix A gives an explanation of the logic used to develop the staff recommendation for each item listed above. Table 2 shows the source of change orders for each of the four jobs the Directors asked to be reviewed. Note that the percentage of actual design omissions and errors is very small in relation to the project's total cost and within ranges well within industry standards. While staff, consultants and the contractors would all prefer error-free jobs, design omissions and errors do not usually represent a large part of the total project cost. TMD:jt ENG/TMD/SR3 .► -2- TABLE 2 Analysis of Reasons for Change Orders Submitted to September 9, 1992 Board ........... TOTAL Wc 0 ----- - Mu PPERCENT: WOAKNOF CAUSED MA ... .............. ... ....... ... ........ . am - BY DESIGNM OMISSIONS. MUTES CHANGES TDIDWRACT - . .. .......... ..... ................ ERttORS 22 2: .. ...... ......... ........ J-17 IOD% $7,00.000 14.99% 3.59% 1.36% 8.9B% 0.76% 0.30% J-19-1 92% $15,410,855 3.90% 0.31% 0.86% 0.31% 0.62% 1.80% Pt-34-3 J-21 99% $27,205,378 2.32% 0.19% 1.30% 0.22% 0.28% 0,33% PI-35-2 P2-42-1 91% $9,369.000 1.72% O.00k 0.26% 0.42% 0.700A 0.34% APPENDIX A TO STAFF REPORT, DATED OCTOBER 15,1992 REGARDING Results of Negotiations re Reimbursement for Error and Omissions Change Orders and Review of Construction Contract Change Order Practices COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 1992 r W The purpose of this report is to provide additional information and clarification for specific items of work for four (4) change orders that were presented to the Board of Directors at their regular meeting on Wednesday, September 9, 1992. The specific items in questions are the result of omissions or ,r errors in the design drawings by the consulting engineers that resulted in plan changes and consequently, extra work. As noted in the Manager's Report of subject meeting, there will be a partial recovery of costs from the consulting engineer. u rl r r r r r TABLE OF CONTENTS r Section I - Central Laboratory J-17 J.R. Roberts Corporation Change Order 12 r Items 1,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,17 and 13 4.1 Section II- Central Power Generation System At Plant No. 1 J-19 Hunter Corporation Change Order 13 Items 1,2,3 ,4 and 5 r Section III- Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 At Plant No. 1 P1-34-3 Advanco Constructors Change Orders 13 Items 1 and 2 ✓ Section IV - Electrification of Pump Drives �..✓ At Plant No. 2 P2-42-1 Ziebarth & Alper Construction Co. Change Order 5 Items 2,3,5 and 6 ✓ Y/ ✓ ✓ Yi C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: _J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY. JOB NO. J-17 ' DESIGNER BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION .I Item I - ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FOR A. C. UNITS The Contractor was directed to furnish and install two additional 14-inch x 26-inch steel beams, one under Air Conditioner No. 2 and the other under Air Conditioner No. 3. The actual structural steel layout of specified air conditioner units was different than shown on the contract drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 19) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,282.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $ 710.00 O MATERIAL : $ 197.00 0 EQUIPMENT: $ 300.00 00 MARK-UP : $ 85.00 $ 40.50 ..r TOTAL: $1282 . 00 $ 42 .50 Item 1 Continued Next Page r r r C.O. No. Twelve ( 12) Item 1 ., Job No. J-17 r Justification For Recommended Allocation r Districts policy dictates that equipment or materials may not be recommended from one source which is called "sole sourcing" . r Contract specifications call for a particular type of equipment or equal. Therefore, after that contract has been awarded, the Contractor will search for the piece of equipment that meets the specifications at the lowest possible price. + Neither the Design nor the Districts know what the actual physical dimensions of the equipment may be until it is presented r to the Districts by the Contractor for review. Therefore another structural member had to be added under the proposed air conditioner unit in order to be safely mounted on the roof. This could have been avoided if the contract included language �Jr that any necessary modifications for "or equal" equipment is the responsibility of the contractor. + r r + r / r v r _ C. 0. NO. Twelve (1" CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 ...r DESIGNER BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION Item - DOUBLE STUD WALL AT STAIRS NO. 1 AND 3 The Contractor was directed to provide double studs for radius walls of stairs No. 1 and No. 3 in order to fill five-inch gap between landing and framing. The gap was created by a dimensional error between the Structural and Architectural Drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: RFI 159 and 160, JRR CDR 36R) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1.992.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days _ RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $ 880 .00 $ 880. 00 MATERIAL : $ 851 .60 $ 851 .60 EQUIPMENT: 0 . 00 0 .00 MARK-UP : $ 260 .40 $ 260 .40 .i TOTAL: $1992 . 00 $1992 .00 U C.O. No. Twelve VI Item 3 Job No. J-17 U Justification For Recommended Allocation L There was a dimensional error between the structural and architectural drawings. This error created a gap between the Ij stair landing pan and the metal studwall. The engineer was y assessed 100% of the cost of this item. I ! YI li ` ,N L IV L L L �LI L _ C. 0. N0. Twelve (121 CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 _ JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY JOB NO J-17 DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION item 5 - ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL SUPPORTS FOR ELEVATOR The Contractor was directed to furnish and install additional structural supports for the elevator. These were required by the State Elevator Inspector in order to meet code. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 60R) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6.500.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days A 111T 1 RECOMNENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR :$ 4500 .00 0 - MATERIAL :$ 1500.00 0 _ EQUIPMENT:$ 131 .00 0 -..r MARK-UP : $ 369.00 $ 184.50 TOTALS 6500 .00 $ 184. 50 C.O. No. Twelve (12) L Item 5 Job No. J-17 -} Justification For Recommended Allocation �li The State of California elevator inspector required additional structural support for the elevator guide rails after the rails V were installed. It is the engineers responsibility to design per code. The cost of this item of work would have increased the bid by an equivalent amount. Staff recommends that the designer reimburse for added costs, at 50% of the overhead and profit. y I L Ff b V L L �L L C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION Item 6 - SHEET METAL COVERS FOR A. C. FILTER UNITS The Contractor was directed to provide sheet metal covers for the four air conditioner filter units. The covers are necessary to protect against water leakage through the A.C. platform into the building. The covers were not shown or called out on the Contract Drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 50) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: f 1,279.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days III i RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $ 548 ,00 0 MATERIAL : $ 548.00 0 EQUIPMENT: $ 0 .00 0 MARK-UP : $ 182.00 0 .. TOTAL:$ 1278 . 00 0 n . C.O. No. Twelve Item 6 Job No. J-17 .� I Justification For Recommended Allocation r' This item was added by staff to prevent problems, should a leak occur. It is part of the "belt and suspender " approach that staff uses is, always backups. It is not a designer error. , n r+ n ^I n C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE Seotember 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION .. Item 7 - RESURVEY CURB The Contractor was required to recalculate and to resurvey the curb for the sample drop off turnout. This was due to an error in the curve data on the Contract Drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 72) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 956.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days e _i RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $ 819.00 $ 819 .00 MATERIAL : 0 .00 0 EQUIPMENT: 0 .00 0 .� MARK—UP : $ 137 .00 $ 137 .00 TOTAL: $ 956.00 $ 956 .00 � L C.O. No. Twelve 1 ' V Item 7 Job No. J-17 I Justification For Recommended Allocation II There was a- error in the curve date on the contract drawings. The contractors surveyor was required to recalculate and restake curb at the sample drop turn out. The engineer was assessed 100% of the cost of this item. I � v L' L I � V u I � u L' I ' 1 u L C. 0. NO. Twelve (121 CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION item 8 - VARIOUS DRYWALL REVISIONS The Contractor was directed to furr walls, columns, and steel posts in Rooms 103, 105, 115. 121. 212, 213, 222, 227, 229, and 231,. soffit in Room 115. The Contractor also provided a stainless steel cap for sill and ceramic tile for window jambs of Room 118. The furring of walls and columns is required for casework to line up and to cover vent ducts. The stainless steel cap and ceramic tile is to extend maintenance. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 71R and 77R. FCO 40) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 13,140.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days • C. O. NO. Twelve (12) W Date September 9, 1992 ` Page 2 Job: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 Li II L,i Item 8 - VARIOUS DRYWALL REVISIONS 11 Li It Lj L i I r L u RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS u COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $ 9, 911 .00 0 I I MATERIAL : $ 2,170 .00 0 L EQUIPMENT: $ 0 0 MARK-UP $ 1,059.00 0 , I TOTAL: $ 13,140.00 0 U 1 ILIi r r C.O. No. Twelve r Item 8 Job No. J-17 r Justification For Recommended Allocation r This is the furring if walls, columns, steel post, soffit and the rear of a drinking fountain added by change orders. The cost of r this item should not be the responsibility of the engineer. W y J r r r r C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION Item 9 - MODIFY SITE WORK The Contractor was directed to construct, pursuant to the revised design, the .. loading dock, concrete ramp, six-foot cross gutter, front entry sidewalk, handicap ramp, and to add handicap ramp, bollard, and wire mesh at rear sidewalk. Also to remove plaster and install 3/4-inch channel screed at two locations on the north face of the building, replaster and refog seal , the entire panel . The Contractor was also directed to delete 4118 linear feet of asphalt paving, 24 linear feet of curb, and 170 square feet of gutter. The revisions are required in order to comply with Federal Registar, Americans with Disabilities Act Title 24, Access to Public Buildings. Deleted items of work to be completed by others. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 41, JRR CDR 78R) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,694.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 20 Calendar Days r x RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $ 9,159.00 0 MATERIAL : 0 .00 0 EQUIPMENT: 0 .00 p MARE-UP $ 535 .00 0 TOTAL: $ 9,694 .00 0 C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) r CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 DATE September 9,1992 ITEM 9 -MODIFY SITE WORK Page 2 r r r r /f l L U C.O. No. TwelveI Item 9 u Job No. J-17 - u Justification For Recommended Allocation v The District directed design changes were made to enhance the use of the facility and to meet the requirements of Americans with Disabilities Act, Title 24, Access to Public Buildings. This Act u took effect after the project was designed, therefore the engineer should not be responsible for these costs. 6i u U �r L L u li U C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY. JOB NO. J-17 DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION _ Item 10 - MODIFY GRAVITY CONVEYORS, DISH SINK, AND HOOD The Contractor was directed to revise the gravity conveyers, dish sink and hood in Room 118. This work consisted of notching and rewelding supports, relocating mounting clips, conveyor modifications, and additional engineering to accomplish the new layout. The Contractor was also directed to fabricate and install stainless steel support legs for hood and 316 stainless steel valve handle guide for dish sink. Revisions were necessary in order for the roam to function as intended. Weight of hood would not allow anchoring into wall only. 30-inch valve extensions required suppport. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 92R) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,622.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days � — r RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CEANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR $ 5, 882 .00 $4 ,451 .00 MATERIAL : $ 740.00 $ 607 .00 EQUIPMENT: 0 n ...i MARK-UP 0 TOTAL: $ 6, 622.00 $5,058 .00 C. O. NO. Twelve (12) DATE September 9, 1992 Page 1 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 ITEM 10 - ADDITIONAL LAB CHASES kFa r �T• x 'r , � . ... r r �r r r r L1 U L C.O. No. Twelve L! Item 10 Job No. J-17 - V Justification For Recommended Allocation Rework of equipment was necessary because of incomplete information on specified equipment and omission of details from .J the contract drawings. The engineer should pay $5,058. of the cost of this item. L li Y.1 �r ( I W Lj Ir i L L u �I j W C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION _ Item 11 - ADDITIONAL LAB CHASES The Contractor was directed to furnish and install four extra lab chases to conceal power, telephone, and data conduit to the lab tops from the second floor ceiling. The Contract Drawings did not show the lab casework being fed from below. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 95) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,548.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Days RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $ 1 ,032 .00 $ 50. 00 MATERIAL : $ 516 .00 0 .... EQUIPMENT: 0 O MARK-UP 0 0 TOTAL: $ 1, 548. 00 $ 50 .00 C. O. NO. Twelve (12 ) DATE September 9, 1992 Page 2 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 -moo, ITEM 11 - ADDITIONAL LAB CHASES r r r r r r r"".00 r d r 'df r r r r 11 I �II 1 C.O. No. Twelve Item 11 �f Job No. J-17 Justification For Recommended Allocation 11 v The lab chases were omitted from the contract drawings. since the cost of this item of work would have increased the bid 1 amount, the engineer should only be responsible for the staff W costs. This item had been negotiated with the Contractor and with no overhead and profit included. LI L I 1 ! r L i� b/ J L L C. 0. N0. Twelve I121 CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 DESIGNER BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION v Item 12 - ADDITIONAL FRAMING AND FIRE RATED DRYWALL r The Contractor was directed to provide additional framing and drywall for fire rated wall in soffit area above Rooms 234 and 236. This work was necessary as there was not enough clearance in the soffit to allow for the HVAC ductwork and r maintain the one-hour fire rating required for the corridor. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 98) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,074.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days d NO PICTURE AVAILABLE v,l V r J RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $ 800.00 0 MATERIAL : $ 120.00 0 EQUIPMENT: 0 0 MARK-UP : $ 154.00 $ 77.00 ,ram TOTAL: $1,074.00 $ 77.00 r U C.O. No. Twelve Item 12 J Job No. J-17 � I V Justification For Recommended Allocation u The engineer did not coordinate between the mechanical and architectural drawings. This lack of coordination required j . additional framing and drywall in order to maintain a one hour 6d fire rating of the corridor. If shown on the plans, the bid prices would have been higher. The staff recommends that the designer share in the added profit and overhead costs. L W I ' 11r �.F i w +II L II �'Wj r _L C. 0. NO. Twelve f121 CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION Item 1 - VELOCITY STACKS FOR EXHAUST FANS The Contractor was directed to furnish and install five additional velocity stacks for Exhaust Fans EF-3, 6, 6, 8, and 13. The stacks were not installed due to a conflict in the Contract Drawings. The HVAC system could not be balanced without the installation of these stacks. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 99) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 1,617.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days V r 1 C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) V DATE September 9, 1992 Page 2 U JOB: LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 ITEM 13 - VELOCITY STACKS FOR EXHAUST FANS u ' , u RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS LAHORCOST: $ 925.00 TOTAL ASSIGHM TO DESIGNER: MATERIAL : $ 460.00 0 EQUIPMENT: 0 0 MARK-UP $ 232 .00 $ 116.00 v TOTAL: $1,617 .00 $ 116.00 V �L r V v V u L u `. L, L r r C.O. No. Twelve r Item 13 Job No. J-17 %W Justification For Recommended Allocation v Only two exhaust fans were called out to have velocity stacks. Seven are required in order to balance the HVAC system. Since ,r the cost of this item of work would have increased the bid amount, Staff recommends that the designer share in its added profits and overhead. r r rl`� r' 1� r b1 �I r r C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 r DESIGNER• BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Item 1 - CONDUIT AND WIRING FOR EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURES This item is for providing conduit, wiring, and junction boxes to provide power for the emergency light fixtures in the Central Power Generation Building. These light fixtures were omitted in the contract documents. Emergency battery packs for type B fixtures are included in this item. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. r (Reference: J191-040) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: E 18,550.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days r " NO PICTURES AVAILABLE " r rr� .w r rl RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS r COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $ 11 ,345.00 0 MATERIAL : $ 4,285.00 0 EQUIPMENT: $ 500.00 0 .� MARE-UP : $ 2,420 .00 $ 835.00 r TOTAL: $ 18,550 .00 $ 835.00 r ii C.O. No. Thirteen li Item 1 y Job No. J-19-1 UO V Conduit And Wiring For Emergency Light Fixtures � I v This item for providing conduit, wiring, and junction boxes to provide power for the emergency light fixtures inside the Central j Generation Building. Contract changes of this scope are more `; costly than original contract costs due to lost productivity, increased field engineering and supervision. The consultant omitted these items from the original design and should reimburse the Districts for these added cost. L' y i� y Yd � j VI L L` l C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 DESIGNER: BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Item 2 - POWER, CONTROL, SIGNAL RACEWAY, AND CABLE FOR ENGINE CONTROLS This item is for providing conduit, supports, wiring, wire terminations and additional testing required to provide power and controls to the owner-supplied engine controls. The contract documents did not provide the correct number of circuits required to operate the control features provided with the engine controls. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)l of the General Provisions. (Reference: J191-031) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 18,191.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days I v� jl 4r C. O. NO. Thirteen (13) DATE September 9, 1992 1 Page 2 kw �ll I V JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT No. 1 J-19-1 � I ITEM 2- POWER, CONTROL, SIGNAL RACEWAY, AND CABLE FOR ENGINE V CONTROLS L � i W It LI L L L RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: �( LABOR : $ 12,397.00 0 MATERIAL : $ 3,221.00 0 EQUIPMENT: $ 200.00 0 L MARK-UP $ 2,373.00 0 TOTAL: $ 18,191.00 $ 682.00 I ! V U C.O. No. Thirteen Item 2 Job No. J-19-1 Power, Control, Signal Raceway, And Cable For Engine Controls Y�1 This item for providing conduit, supports, wiring, wiring terminations, and additional testing to provide power for the v generator engine controls. Contract changes of this scope are more costly than original contract costs due to lost productivity, increased field engineering and supervision. The .r consultant omitted these items from the original design and should reimburse the Districts for these added cost. Yd r� r •.I r� r C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No 1 Job No J-19-1 DESIGNER: BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Item 3 - ELEVATOR SHAFT REVISIONS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE' This item is for providing a ladder, receptacle, junction box, light fixture, switch and associated conduit and wiring in the elevator shaft to comply with state elevator code requirements. These items were not provided for in the contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. (Reference: J191-043) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,014.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ill � , •I i a C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) DATE September 9, 1992 II Page 2 .J �I L JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1. _ L ITEM 3 - ELEVATOR SHAFT REVISIONS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE L If Wd L `L I .J L L L RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION L OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR $ 2,098 .00 0 MATERIAL : $ 1,257.00 0 L EQUIPMENT: $ 135.00 0 �I MARK_Dp : $ 524.00 $ 262.00 TOTAL: $ 4,014.00 S 262.00 ( 'L �U hJ r r ..W, r C.O. No. Thirteen r Item 3 Job No. J-19-1 r Elevator Shaft Revisions For Code Compliance r This item for providing facilities in the elevator shaft to allow safe access and working conditions for maintenance personnel working inside shaft. These items are required by state elevator codes. Contract changes of this scope are more costly than original contract costs due to lost productivity, increased field engineering and supervision. The consultant omitted these items from the original design and should reimburse the Districts for these added cost. r r r r r r C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 .y DESIGNER: BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Item 4 - ENGINE STATUS PANEL COMPONENTS AND CABLE This item is for adding push-buttons, indicating lights, and tarminal boards to the engine status panel shown on contract drawings 2E27 and 2E44. These changes to the panel are required for compatibility between the owner-supplied equipment and contractor-furnished control panel . These panel components were not required in the contract documents. This item includes credit for deleting control raceway and cable between the status panel and the uninterruptible power supply that is no longer required. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)l of the General Provisions. (Reference: J191-044) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,921.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days r NO PICTURES AVAILABLE " se\ � r r RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $ 583 . 00 0 MATERIAL : $1 ,117 .00 0 EQUIPMENT: 0 0 MARK—UP : $ 221 .00 0 r TOTAL:$1 ,921 .00 0 L L C.O. No. Thirteen Item 4 6 Job No. J-19-1 U Engine Status Panel Components And Cable it This item for adding push-buttons, indicating lights, and terminal boards to the engine status panel. These items are for compatibility with the owner supplied equipment and were 6,, overlooked by staff, Cooper Industries, and the designer. This is a small omission which can be expected on projects of this ` I complexity. U L I � U u L L L L L LW I _ C. 0. NO.-Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1 \I DESIGNER: BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS r Item 5 - GLASS BLOCK MODIFICATIONS This item is for providing lintels and flashing at the second floor level for ,r glass block windows and revising wall openings for glass block at the front door in the Central Power Building. Contract drawings require glass -block windows that are thirty-two feet in height which exceeds the allowable unsupported height allowed by the building code. This item includes support angles'and weather flashing at the second floor level for three high windows on the north side of the building. This item also includes widening of the wall opening on both sides of the front door to include space for the glass block expansion joints. Contract drawings show a 16-inch opening on both sides of the door. Sixteen and one half inches are required to install the glass block and expansion joints. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to ,. Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,603.00 r TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 46,279.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days r RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS r COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $ 2, 585.00 $982 . 30 MATERIAL : $ 548 .00 EQUIPMENT: 0 $208024 MARK-UP : $ 470.00 $178 .60 r TOTAL: $ 3,603 .00 $1,369 .14 1 son won now Now zl T „ - SNOISVJI3IOOW MDOW SSV'IO T-6I-f -oN 9of I -ON INVU I WRISAS NOIIVESNS0 MaMOd gVEINSJ :BOf t Z661 ' 6 uagwa3daS SdVO ( FI ) uaaiilgl 'ON 'O'? i u . u C.O. No. Thirteen V Item 5 Job No. J-19-1 Glass Block Modifications Ir This item for adding support lintels for glass block windows and also for reworking the openings around the front door to allow v room for installation of glass expansion joints. The designer detailed a dimension on the plans which did not allow 'enough room to install the glass block expansion joint at the front door. L This opening in the concrete wall at the front door had to be widened on half inch after concrete had been poured. Costs associated with chipping out and grouting back the concrete wall are being charged to the designer. y L V �.1 I Li I ' v L L y L C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) r CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE September 9. 1992 Zurn Constructors. Inc. JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-34-3: Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-35-2: and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare r Facilities at Plants 1 and 2. Job No. J-21 DESIGNER: JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS r Ite - LPDG PIPING MODIFICATION The Contractor was directed to reroute the low pressure digester gas piping r (LPDG) on the east wall of Control Building 11-14 when conflicts were discovered. The 20-inch ductile iron piping, as shown on the contract drawings, interferes with an HVAC exhaust fan at the same elevation. The most cost effective solution was to reroute the piping over the exhaust fan. The work was r negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-052) r ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,105.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days r r ' C9 r RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $ 859 .00 0 MATERIAL : $ 3471 .00 0 EQUIPMENT: $ 863 .00 0 r MARK-UP 912 .00 $ 456 .00 TOTAL: $6,105 .00 $ 456.00 u U C.O. No. Thirteen Item 1 U Job No. P1-34-3 L� Reconfigure LPDG Piping The item would have been avoided if the contractor had been given 111 clear information with which to work. The plans for this Li piping were lacking essential information and the contractor was given supplemental information which conflicted with the original drawings. For these reasons, a design fee j � equal to 7. 5% of the extra costs should be refunded by the design L� consultant. - U i �J I L U IL IY�III r u U Ly C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE September 9. 1992 Zurn Constructors. Inc. JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-34-3: Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plan= No. 1. Job No. PS-35-2: and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare _ Facilities at Plants 1 and 2. Job No. J-21 DESIGNER: JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS Item 2 - GAS PIPE SUPPORT CHANGE The pipe support detail shown on the contract drawings for the LPDG piping on the roof of the Control Buildings indicates a flush mounted pipe. The piping, however, must be supported in order to clear the 12-inch parapet curb and also to maintain a slope down to the drip traps. Since the parapet was incorporated in the roofing membrane system, it was decided to direct the Contractor to change the specified support detail to a concrete saddle type with a galvanized retainer strap in order to support the piping at the correct elevation and provide seismic restraint. The work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-53) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,852.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days _ RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $ 4722.00 0 MATERIAL : $ 3270 .00 0 EQUIPMENT: $ 1064 .00 0 MARK-UP : $ 796 .00 0 TOTAL: $ 9852 .00 0 JOB: CONSTRUCTION OF DIGESTERS NOS. C. O. NO. Thirteen ( 13 ) 11-16 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 DATE September 9 , 1992. JOB NO. P1-34-3 Page 2 ITEM 2 - GAS PIPE SUPPORT CHANGE C J � i Q :� • QI _ y L C.O. No. Thirteen II Item 2 u Job No. P1-34-3 L LPDG Piping Supports L The item would have been avoided if the correct detail had been shown on the plans. However, the contractor's bid would have been higher by this same amount. The change is a result of a L drafting error and as such no refunded monies are necessary from the consultant. L L L u L L L L C. 0. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth 6 Alper and C.S. Alper DATE September 9. 1992 Construction Co. r JOB: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1 .� DESIGNER: JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS Item 2 - FILTER CONTROL POWER After installation was complete, it was later determined that the Ocean Outfall Booster Station Harmonic Filter Control Power from Panel 'AL' should be connected to Panel 'BL' for Pumps Nos. 3, 4, and S. In case of a power failure on Panel 'AL', the facility would lose all filter control to all pumps. Therefore, the Contractor was instructed to disconnect and reconnect the control power on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2) (B) . (Reference: PCH No. 026) . ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 411.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days see 00 • AA 1 ; r r RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $358 .00 $179 .00 MATERIAL : 0 0 EQUIPMENT: 0 0 MARK-UP : $ 53.00 $ 26.50 _ TOTAL:$411 .00 $205.50 ITEM 2 CONTINUED NEXT PAGE r C. O. NO. FIVE ( 5 ) DATE September 9, 1992 Page 2 JOB: ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 `/ P2-42-1 M ITEM 2 FILTER CONTROL POWER r r r r . r r r 1 ; Ld V IN C.O. No. Five (5) Item 2 Job No. P2-42-1 u 1 Justification For Recommended Allocation y In order to assure the reliability of the Ocean Outfall Booster 11 Station in the event of a power failure, approximately one-half of the available power was placed on one power feed (Bus A) and `r the other half on a second power feed (Bus B) . The Designer and the Districts shared in this change. II L ' t �Ir ••� 1 i ; IL; L L L 1 L W C. 0. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR:_Ziebarth & Alper and C.S Alper DATE September 9. 1992 Construction Co. J08: Electrification of Pump Drives at Trgatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1 DESIGNER: JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS Item 3 - PRESSURE SWITCHES Problems were experienced with the pressure switches that regulate the flow for the seal water of the ten new pumps installed in Headworks 8 and C. The pressure switches initially specified did not work properly due to the dirty plant water. The Contractor was instructed to replace the ten switches with a better design that was more suitable to the dirty water conditions at a firm price in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) . (Reference: Jahn Carollo Engineers' letter dated April 15, 1992 and PCH No. 027) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,875.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days s b 4 T� or RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CEANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR $ 720.00 $ 180 .00 MATERIAL : $ 2900.00 $ 725 .00 EQUIPMENT: $ 560 .00 140.00 MARK-UP : $ 695 .00 $ 173 .75 TOTAL: $ 4875 .00 $1218 .75 ITEM 2 CONTINUED NEXT Page C. O. NO. FIVE ( 5) y DATE September 9 , 1992 Page 2 ..1 JOB: ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 P2-42-1 ITEM 3 PRESSURE SWITCHES al y- •J I r 4 r r _ N%wo� r i � 64 C.O. No. Five (5) II Item 3 L Job No. P2-42-1 i ! V Justification For Recommended Allocation u The Districts utilizes plant water throughout their operations for the cooling of engines, seal water for pumps, wash down of � . facilities and many other general uses. The quality of the water y varies from time to time , depending on the amount of foreign matter that may find its way into the system, such as algae debris, snails, etc. Therefore, the Districts share the greatest percentage of responsibility, however, the Designer has been associated with the Districts operations for a long time and is very familiar with these operations. Therefore, they are subject to some liability in this occurrence. L ` ,r I V r L L i r L LJ Ir 1111 C. 0. NO. Five (5) CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper DATE September 9. 1992 Construction Co. JOB: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1 DESIGNER: JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS Item 5 - REMOVE CONCRETE PADS The contract drawings did not provide for the removal of the existing reinforced concrete pads that supported the two engines, lube oil, and heat recovery units in the Primary Effluent Pumping Station. These concrete pads sticking above the operating floor presented an obstruction to the operation and maintenance of the new electric motors that replaced the engines. The Contractor was instructed to provide labor and equipment on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2) (B) . (Reference: PCH No. 031) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,252.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: LABOR : $ 3,952.00 -0 MATERIAL : $ 1,740.00 0 EQUIPMENT: $ 1,500.00 0 MARK-UP : $ 1,060.00 0 TOTAL:$ 8,252 .00 _ 0 ITEM 5 CONTINUED NEXT PAGE r C. O. NO. FIVE (5) DATE September 9, 1992 PAGE 2 JOB: ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2 _ JOB NO. P2-42-1 ITEM 5 - REMOVE CONCRETE PADS r r r r r W u u C.O. No. Five ( 5) Item 5 Job No. P2-42-1 r W Justification For Recommended Allocation During the preliminary design review process in which Operations and Maintenance personnel were involved, particularly the review meetings, no request was made by them to remove the engine and heat recovery equipment concrete pads. v While the Contractor was in the area performing other demolition work and after the stated equipment had been removed, it became apparent that leaving the concrete pads would be a safety hazard. W The Districts benefited having the work performed while the Contractor was in the area since the work was on a time and material basis with no additional costs later for an additional move in and move out for this or any other Contractor. i r v W 1,I V 1 C. 0. N0. Five (51 .. CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper DATE September g. 1992 Construction Co. JOB: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1 `DESIGNER: JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS .. Item 6 - MODIFY LIGHTING FIXTURES ' The contract drawings specified 21 120 volt lighting fixtures for Headworks C when in fact there is 480 volt power existing. The Contractor had already purchased and received the lighting fixtures when the error was discovered. The Contractor returned the lighting fixtures ballast housings to the manufacturer but was assessed a handling and restocking fee. Work was performed on a force account in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2) (B) . (Reference: PCH No. 032) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 889.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 17,689.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days r 1 1 } i li V u u C.O. No. Five (5) Item 6 y Job No. P2-42-1 vl Justification For Recommended Allocation The Designer shall be charged the full amount of the plan change -- due to his error in the contract drawings and specifications. V L r L RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS L COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: L LABOR : 0 0 L MATERIAL : $780.00 $788.00 EQUIPMENT: 0 MARK-UP : $109 .00 $109.00 TOTAL:$889.00 $889.00 L ITF.MR 5 rnMTTMnFn NEXT PA( r LL L V L I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ,{ b ORANGE COUNtY, CALIFORNIA i tOBO<FWG GVENNE PO.BO%B127 MWNN VP Y.GL6 IA 92720d127 October 22, 1992 v1"I862.pA11 STAFF REPORT AB 2588 AIR TOWS "HOT SPOTS" NOTIFICATION OBLIGATIONS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIONS TO COMPLY BACKGROUND The Sanitation Districts' staff is preparing to implement the next phase of the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB 2588), the public notification requirement AB 2588 is a multi-phase, multi-year program designed to quantify and characterize emissions of air toxics from stationary sources and to notify the public of potentially significant "theoretical" health risks associated with facility emissions. All of the provisions of AB 2588 are applicable to the Sanitation Districts' wastewater treatment facilities in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach. Beginning in 1989, facilities that emit toxic air contaminants were required to provide the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) with an emissions inventory every two years. The emissions data are used by SCAQMD to place facilities into priority categories. Facilities in the highest theoretical emission category must conduct a ./ health risk assessment report and submit it to SCAQMD. The Sanitation Districts have complied with these provisions. After preliminary review, these health risk assessment reports were forwarded for approval to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CALEPA). Approximately 350 health risk assessment reports are expected to be submitted to SCAQMD (42 from Orange County), about 150 of which have now been reviewed and forwarded to the CALEPA. To date, CALEPA has not approved any of the 150 health risk assessment reports submitted by the SCAQMD. AS 2588 also requires that upon approval of the health risk assessment report, the operator of the facility must notify all potentially exposed persons about its results if, in the judgement of the SCAQMD, the health risk assessment report indicates that there is a "significant health risk" associated with emissions from the facility. A determination of what is a significant health risk, for purposes of controlling emissions and reducing risk, has yet to be decided by SCAQMD; however, the development of guidelines for the notification procedure have been completed by SCAQMD, which is given considerable latitude by the state with respect to the notification process. SCAQMD has decided what risk level will trigger public notification, what notification procedure will be employed, and will identify which facilities must notify potentially exposed individuals and will ensure that notifications are consistent with the established procedure. SCAQMD staff, together with other legislative, scientific, business and environmental \r� representatives have worked on this complex issue since February 1991. The Sanitation Districts' staff members were active participants throughout the development of the notification guidelines. SCAOMD GUIDELINES On October 2, 1992 the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted its AB 2588 notification procedure guidelines. Sanitation Districts' staff believes these guidelines are a reasonable compromise between the proposals by SCAQMD, the public sector, the business and environmental communities. The major points of the adopted guidelines are the following: 1. Notification Levels The trigger level of the notification procedure has been established by the SCAQMD Board as a 10-in-a-million carcinogenic risk, for the Maximally Exposed Individual (MEI) as a result of exposure to emissions from an individual facility. The definition of MEI contains an extremely conservative assumption that the individual is continuously exposed to the highest possible annual concentration throughout a lifetime span of 70 years, 365 days per year, 24 hours- a-day. For the maximally exposed individual workers (employment population) the assumed exposure is for 46 years of employment, 240 days-per-year, 8 hours- per-day. 'There is an additional special provision requiring notification of affected .,sensitive receptors" (schools, hospitals, day care centers, etc.) who are assumed to �.J have 70-year continuous exposure. For noncarcinogenic toxic exposure a corresponding trigger level is characterized by a Hazard Index (HI) equal to 1.0 (0.5 for lead exposure). Hazard Index is defined as the sum of an individual's daily intake from all routes of exposure for a toxic contaminant divided by the acceptable daily intake for the contaminant. 2. Public Notification Letter from SCAQMD Public notification will consist of notification letters mailed to every residence, business and sensitive receptor containing persons theoretically exposed to a 10- in-a-million risk. SCAQMD will develop the notification language for each emitting facility and each facility is responsible for distributing the letters to the addresses within the potentially exposed area. The letter will be written in both English and Spanish. SCAQMD will evaluate if other non-English languages should be used for the notification letter. Sanitation Districts' staff does not anticipate that other languages will be declared necessary by the SCAQMD for the neighborhoods adjacent to our two facilities. 2 The letter will identity our facilities by full name and address and will provide a name and telephone number of a contact person at our facilities to answer questions. The actual cancer risk value will not be stated in the letter. Instead,the increased chance of developing cancer will be referred to as greater than or equal to 10-in-one-million, 100-in-one-million, etc. For noncancer exposures, one letter for chronic health risk and another letter for acute health risk is being proposed. However, SCAQMD is considering consolidating these two letters. The letter will also contain an area map with a zone of impact and a risk comparison graph or table containing other relative risk information such as breathing background ambient air in the South Coast Basin and breathing air while driving a car on the freeway. 3. Public Notification Letter from Emitting Facilities (Sanitation Districts) All facilities, including the Sanitation Districts, will have the option to accompany the SCAQMD letter with their own letter in the same envelope. The letter may provide supplemental information, including the facility's efforts to reduce emissions of toxic air contaminants. The facility letter must be reviewed and approved by SCAQMD. Sanitation Districts' staff are in the early stage of developing the content and format of the letter. 4. Public Notification Meetings and Library Reference Material ... In addition to notification letters, facilities must sponsor a public meeting at which additional information about the facility's risk assessment report can be provided and questions can be answered. The facility may announce the public meeting and state the location, date and time in the notification letter. SCAQMD may establish guidelines for the meeting and may send a representative to participate in the meetings. One copy of the health risk assessment report must also be sent to the closest public library and, if asked, to the library of any school within the zone of impact. 5. Notification Schedule The notification procedure must be initiated no later than 30 days after the health risk assessment report has been approved by CAL-EPA. Since AB 2588 requires facilities to submit thew Emissions Inventory Report every two years, the same frequency is recommended for the notification procedure. Facilities with a cancer risk of more than 100-in-one-million may be asked to notify the affected population on a yearly basis if deemed necessary by SCAQMD. 3 Y HOW THE SANITATION DISTRICTS ARE AFFECTED Staff completed the initial AB 2588 Air Toxics Emission Inventory and health risk assessment reports in June 1991. The reports were received by SCAQMD in December 1991 and have been sent to CAL-EPA for its consideration and approval. So far no response has been received from CAL-EPA. It is our understanding that the large number of reports combined with limited qualified CAL-EPA staff are responsible for this protracted delay. Without CALEPA's final determination, Sanitation Districts' staff can only estimate what is in store for us based on the preliminary results included in our health risk assessment reports. The basic conclusion of our reports is that among the more than 60,000 residents surrounding our two treatment plants, only about 300 MEI households may be exposed to a theoretical cancer risk greater than 10-in-a-million. For those approximately 300 households with a risk above the notification level, the Sanitation Districts will be obligated to send them notification letters and to conduct a public meeting. No workers have a theoretical cancer risk of greater than 10-in-a-million at either of our two facilities or within businesses adjacent to our facilities. No sensitive receptors (schools, hospitals, etc.) receive significant cancer risk due to toxics emissions from our plants. Non-carcinogenic health risk (acute and chronic) for both residential and working population is much lower than the notification level established by SCAQMD. `✓ PROPOSED STEPS 1. Sanitation Districts' Worker Notification Sanitation Districts' employees have expressed continuing interest in the results of the AB 2588 testing program and potential health impacts on them. Fortunately, we will be able to provide them with encouraging news because our employees have neither carcinogenic nor non-carcinogenic health risks above the level considered "significant". Even though we are not obligated to notify them, staff proposes to conduct briefing meetings for our employees to communicate the results of the AB 2588 testing program, discuss potential health affects and inform them about our efforts to reduce our emissions and the resulting risk. 2. Public Notification Approximately 300 residences are located within the 10-in-one-million zone of impact (approximately 1/4 of a mile from our facilities' fencelines) and, therefore, must be notified. Upon final approval of the Sanitation Districts' health risk assessment report, staff proposes to prepare a letter, after collaboration with the 1� 4 1 r SCAQMD, to the affected residents which will be included with the SCAQMD letter (We were required to follow a similar public notification procedure as part of our SCAQMD permitting requirements for the central power generating facilities, and we sent out our own letter). Our letter will provide information about our facilities, sources of toxic's emission inside the plants, the reasons we have emissions, and a chart that puts our risk in relative significance with many of the other common day-to-day risks we all encounter. Our letter will also describe the emission reduction measures we have already initiated as well as future emission reduction measures. Residents will also be informed about the availability of the Sanitation Districts' health risk assessment reports in the public libraries closest to our facilities. We will also announce the public meetings (one for each of our facilities). 3. Public Meetings The two public meetings should be organized at a time convenient for the residents (e.g., weekends, evenings) and coordinated with SCAQMD whose representative we will strongly recommend be present at the meetings. Sanitation Districts' staff intends to conduct public meetings that will be informative, open and honest. The meetings will be conducted at times and locations that will be convenient and accessible to our neighbors. This will be a collaborative effort of our technical and public information staff to assure the highest quality meetings possible. Staff will also prepare written materials for distribution and discussion during the meeting. 4. Cost of Program Staff estimates the cost of the AB 2588 notification to be less than $10,000 (approximately $1,000 for letter preparation and distribution and about 200 hours of staff time for development of materials and attending meetings). Funds are already earmarked in the existing budget under an AB 2588 line item and all tasks can be completed within existing staff authorities. RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff requests concurrence of the proposed steps to comply with AB 2588 by the Directors. VK/cmc Ref#: 240169.RP 5 POTWs and Air Quality Overview • Historically, POTWs had to deal with odor emissions and criteria pollutant emissions • Late 1980's, toxics and reactive organic gas emissions • Risk assessments now required • Larger POTWs tend to exceed threshold levels considered "significant" • Public notification now required •Technology not established to control air toxics Existing Air Toxic Legislation/Rules • The Toxic Hot Spot Assessment and Information Act of 1987 (AB 2588) • SCAQMD Rule 1401 - New Source Review for Carcinogens Our Obligations Under SCAQMD Rule 1401 : • Estimate carcinogenic emissions from new or modified sources e Model theoretical risk from emissions on workers and community • Install technology if threshold risk is exceeded Our Obligations Under AB 2588: • Inventory emissions from existing facilities i Model theoretical risk impact from emissions on workers and community • Inform public of risk What Has This Cost the Sanitation Districts? SCAQMD Rule 1401 o Required for the following projects Central generation (Plants 1 and 2) Waste gas flares (Plants 1 and 2) Primary treatment expansion (Plant 1 ) Secondary expansions (Plants 1 and 2) o We have spent $600,000 in studies o No cost for T-BACT to date What Has This Cost the Sanitation Districts? AB 2588 • 1990-91 sampling , analysis, modelling and reporting cost $1 .1 million • 1992 Biennial update $200,000 • Future biennial updates approximately $50,000 using more in-house work What are our Future Obligations? Mandatory ® Notify public under AB 2588 • New source review under SCAQMD Rule 1401 o Respond to new control mandates Optional • Reduce impact of toxic emissions on community • Reduce cost of complying with Air Quality mandates AB 2588 Public Notification Requirements • Notification level is 10-in-a-million • Mandatory SCAQMD letter • Optional facility letter • Mandatory public meetings • Mandatory library copies AB 2588 Notification Staff's Proposal • Prepare facility letter to accompany SCAQMD letter and send to approximately 300 households • Hold employee briefing meetings prior to public meetings • Hold two public meetings - Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach ® Prepare written materials for meetings AB 2588 Notification Cost For Staff's Proposal • Approximately $1 ,000 for mailings • 200 staff hours for development of materials and attending public meetings • Funding under previous AB 2588 authorization AB 2588 Notification ® No formal Board action required for compliance, but staff is seeking concurrence on proposed actions COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS eI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA 1084LA ELLIS AVENUE GO BOX 8127 FOUNTAIN VALLEY,"LIFORNIA 92IM-0127 `III, 0 Ia1002-2a11 October 22, 1992 STAFF REPORT AIR TOXICS, VOC, AND ODOR CONTROL BIOFILTRATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT INTRODUCTION The Sanitation Districts are faced with complying with local, state and federal regulations that will limit the amount of toxic and volatile organic emissions from our treatment plants. Within the next couple of years we will be required to develop a risk reduction plan and implement control strategies to achieve specified emission reductions. Staff believes that biofilters represent a promising technology for POTWs to cost-effectively achieve required toxic and volatile organic emission reductions while mitigating any potential odor problem. However, this technology must be proven before it can be applied at our facilities, or at other POTWs. Staff is therefore recommending a biofiltration demonstration project. GRANT FUNDING In previous discussions with the Directors pertaining to compliance with evolving air quality regulations of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), the California Air Resources Board (CARS) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), staff has been urged to seek funding from other sources, including the regulators, for development of new control technologies. Staff has investigated other funding sources for air toxics demonstration projects and has identified three potential sources for funding a biofiltration demonstration project. Biofiltration is a promising control technology for the treatment of POTW off-gases because of its potential to cost- effectively remove not only toxics and VOCs, but also odorous compounds. Staff has concluded that biofiltration is one control technology that is a good potential candidate for application at our treatment plants. The Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF), which is a nationally recognized organization for funding research projects in the field of wastewater, and only recently air quality, has indicated it is willing to help fund a research project at POTW to demonstrate biofiltration technology for removing toxic and VOC emissions. The Sanitation Districts' staff has submitted a proposal to WERF requesting $30,000 to demonstrate this technology. The Technology Advancement Office of the SCAQMD provides funding for new and innovative projects. Sanitation Districts' staff believes that biofiltration will qualify as an innovative technology based on preliminary discussions with SCAQMD staff. SCAQMD's Technology Assessment Committee, consisting of three SCAQMD Board members, has unanimously endorsed the project at a $125,000 funding level, and will convey it to the full board for its consideration. If our proposal is accepted, SCAQMD may fund up to almost one-half of the project cost. In addition, Southern California Edison (SCE) is active in co-sponsoring innovative research. Preliminary discussions with SCE staff indicate that they may be willing to co- sponsor this study in an amount up to $50,000. BIOFILTRATION TECHNOLOGY Biofiltration is a gas treatment technology that utilizes microorganisms to biologically degrade the VOC and toxic compounds that are contained in off-gases. It uses very little energy other than a fan to evacuate the air space of the process unit and distribute it to the biofilter, and a pump to occasionally flush the reactor to control pH, or feed nutrients to the microorganisms. In biofiltration, off-gases are passed through a wet, biologically active porous medium. Pollutants such as toxics, VOCs and hydrogen sulfide pass from the air to the water in the biofilter where they are degraded by the microorganisms. The potential advantages of biofiltration are that the pollutants are converted to harmless products, no hazardous residues are generated, and operating costs are significantly lower than traditional treatment technologies such as the wet scrubbers we presently use. In addition, biofilters do not require large amounts of energy or chemicals (as do incinerators or scrubbers) or costly regeneration procedures (as activated carbon does). WHY WE SHOULD DEMONSTRATE THE FEASIBILITY OF BIOFILTRATION Staff estimates that it costs us approximately $80,000 to $100,000 annually to operate and maintain one packed tower scrubber, which is only effective in removing odorous compounds. The Sanitation Districts operate thirty-three scrubbers. This amounts to an annual operating cost of approximately $2.9 million. Staff does not know the cost of operating a biofilter because there is not enough information available at this time. However, we do know that biofilters require limited chemicals and energy and have few mechanical parts that would require maintenance. Thus, staff anticipates that they would be substantially cheaper to operate than scrubbers. Biofilters are expected to remove not only odors, but toxic and smog-producing emissions as well. This is very important because the EPA, CARE and SCAQMD are developing 2 rules that will require POTWs to control these emissions and to reduce risk to the public. For instance, SB 1731, which became law this year, will require all stationary sources that emit significant quantities of toxic to develop and implement a risk reduction program. In addition, SCAQMD has proposed Rule 1402 for adoption in early 1993. Rule 1402 would require the Sanitation Districts to develop and implement a risk-reduction program for all of our existine facilities. Rule 1401, which was adopted in 1990, already obligates us to control emissions from our new or modified facilities. Although they are effective in mitigating odors, we know that our existing packed tower scrubbers are ineffective in removing toxic and VOC pollutants. Therefore, we have two options. Our first option is to install additional conventional scrubber control technology such as activated carbon to remove the pollutants. This technology has a high annual operating cost and results in the generation of a hazardous waste. The Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts use this technology and they are facing increasingly high disposal costs for the spent activated carbon. Our second option is to develop other control strategies that are potentially more cost-effective, such as biofiltration, or other means such as process modifications and/or upstream source control. If the Sanitation Districts can demonstrate the reliability of biofiltration we could save millions of annual operating dollars, reduce our liability associated with the disposal of a hazardous waste, and comply with SCAQMD, CARB and EPA requirements. STATUS OF BIOFILTER TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT The Europeans have utilized biofiltration for many years. In the United States, however, the technology is in its early stages of development. Most of the work so far has focused on soil bed biofilters to treat soil and/or groundwater contaminated with hydrocarbons. Some work has been done on using biofilters (usually soil bed and compost) for treating odors from wastewater pump stations. But little, if any, data is available on toxic and VOC removal from these systems. Researchers at several universities, including the University of Southern California (USC), have been studying biofilters. Most of the research has been on hydrocarbon removal. USC recently received a grant from the SCAQMD to evaluate biofilter removal of hydrocarbons from leaking underground storage tanks. RMT Inc., an environmental engineering consulting firm, has teamed up with a European-based firm to evaluate the performance of biofilters in removing volatile organic air emissions from dry cleaners and bakeries. The SCAQMD and SCE are funding these projects. 3 Biofiltration holds considerable promise for treating the high concentrations of toxic and volatile organic pollutants found in industrial settings. However, the ability of biofilters to remove the very low concentration of toxics and volatile organic compounds typically present in POTW air emissions has not been demonstrated. Research on the optimum support medium for the microorganisms, biofilter configuration, and removal effectiveness is needed to determine whether biofiltration is a reliable technology for POTWs. Staff concludes that because the cost of traditional control strategies is so substantial, the expense of research is well justified. PROPOSED PROTECT TEAM Sanitation Districts' staff has prepared and submitted preliminary proposals to WERF, SCAQMD and SCE to determine their willingness to fund biofilter research. Staff anticipates that WERF and SCAQMD will make decisions on the proposals in November 1992. Because of the complexity of this project, outside resources and expertise are required. Staff has identified a highly qualified team of professionals which consists of our in-house air quality specialists, specialist on biofilters from the Civil Engineering Department of USC and environmental engineers from Schaefer Dixon Associates, an environmental engineering consulting firm. USC has a professor in their Civil Engineering Department with considerable experience with biofilters, who has been successful in obtaining grants from SCAQMD for biofilter research; and USC is relatively close (most researchers in this field are either out of state or in northern California). Schaefer Dixon Associates (SDA) was identified because our proposal to WERF emphasized evaluating European biofiltration technology to which SDA has direct access because of their affiliation with Huntingdon West, a London-based engineering firm. SDA also has experience with biotechnology related to treatment of contaminated soil. PROPOSED PROTECT The proposal demonstration project consists of five steps: Step I - Literature Search and Review Step II - Development of Experimental Protocol Step III - Bench-Scale Testing Program Step IV - Pilot-Scale Testing Program Step V - Conceptual Design Report and Cost Estimates for a Full-Scale Biofilter The first required step is a review of existing United States and overseas literature pertaining to biofiltration. Next would be to develop detailed protocols to test the performance of bench-scale and pilot-scale biofilters. A site adjacent to the headworks scrubbers at our Fountain Valley plant is proposed as the test site. If the biofilters prove effective and reliable, the final step in this phase would be to develop a conceptual 4 design and cost estimates for a full-scale biofilter. It is anticipated that the demonstration project will have a duration of one-and-a-half years. Upon completion of this demonstration project, the Sanitation Districts would likely pursue funding from WERF, SCAQMD, CARB, EPA or private interests; and solicit proposals to design, construct and test the performance of a full-scale biofilter at our treatment plant. The conceptual design report will provide sufficient information to fully describe the necessary parameters of a full-scale biofilter. ESTIMATED COST AND FUNDING Staff estimates the total cost of the project at $280,000. This cost and anticipated funding is broken down as follows: DEMONSTRATION PROJECT COST DESCRIPTION AMOUNT Internal Sanitation Districts' Labor $62,000 (includes benefits and overhead) �..i Equipment and Materials $ 39,000 Travel $ 5,000 Subcontracts 1. USC $ 80,800 2. Schaefer Dixon Associates $ 3,200 3. Outside Analytical Laboratory $ 65,000 4. Construction Services $ 25,000 Total $280.000 DEMONSTRATION PROJECT FUNDING SOU RC AMOUNT SCAQMD $124,568 WERF $ 30,000 SANITATION DISTRICTS $125.432 Total 280 000 5 Staff estimates approximately 1,100 staff hours will be spent on this project over the one- and-a-half-year period. Equipment and material costs include purchase of two pilot scale biofilters, air blowers, flow regulators, sampling canisters, cleaning equipment and miscellaneous equipment and supplies. Staff has budgeted $65,000 to conduct contract analytical testing for which we currently have no in-house capabilities. The budget for constructing the support facilities that will house the bench and pilot-scale biofilters is $25,000. In addition, staff has discussed funding with SCE, who may fund up to $50,000 for the project. If all of the requested amount of funding is approved, the cost to the Sanitation Districts for this project may be as low as $76,000. RECOMMENDATIONS If the Directors concur with staffs recommendations, the following actions would be appropriate: 1) Authorize staff to conduct the biofiltration demonstration project to study the performance of biofdters for treating toxic, volatile organic and odorous compounds from our off-gases. 2) Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with USC for services pertaining to the biofiltration demonstration project in an amount not to exceed $80,800. 3) Authorize staff to secure the services of construction contractors to construct the necessary support facilities to conduct pilot testing of the biofiltion demonstration project (estimated amount is $25,000). 4) Authorize staff to secure the services of contract analytical laboratories in accordance with established procurement procedures, to conduct the necessary testing pertaining to the biofiltration demonstration project (estimated amount is $65,000). 5) Authorize staff to enter into a grant agreement with SCAQMD for partial funding of the biofiltration demonstration project in the amount of $124,568. 6) Authorize staff to enter into a grant agreement with the Water Environment Research Foundation for partial funding of the biofiltration demonstration project in the amount of $30,000. 6 Note that the services required of Schaefer Dixon Associates (estimated amount is $3,200), is within staffs exacting procurement authority in accordance with established procurement procedures. Staff will report back to the Directors after receiving notice from WERF and SCAQMD prior to proceeding with the project. Also, if SCE indicates an interest in participating, staff will report back and request authority to enter into a grant agreement with SCE, which could reduce the Sanitation Districts' costs from about $125,000 to about $76,000. EMT/cmc Ref#: 240170.RP Air Toxics Control Technology Why Should We Develop Short and Long-Term Strategies to Reduce Toxic Air Emissions? • Existing and emerging federal , state and regional requirements • Informed community • Present high cost of existing control technology and limited development of new control technology Air Toxics Coi _ _rol Technology Legislative/Re ulatory Mandates • Federal Clean Air Act Standards 90% reduction mandated 1995 deadline for development of regulations for POTWS • California SB 1731 Requires air districts to define "significant" risk Requires facilities to develop risk reduction plan by July 1993 Implement risk reduction measure within five years Air Toxics Control Technology Leg islative./Rea ulatory Mandates • SCAQMD Rule 1401 - Requires measurement, modelling and risk assessment - New expansions will continue to trigger this rule - Significant Risks will trigger installation of technology Air Toxics Control Technology Legislative /Regulatory Drivers Mandates • SCAQMD proposed rules 1401 . 1 - New source review for non-carcinogens - Will increase compliance costs associated with capital development projects 1402 - Establishes existing facility risk levels - Requires facilities to develop risk reduction plan - implement risk reduction measures within three years Air Toxics Control Technology Reasons to Evaluate Cost Effective Control Strategies • Federal requirement to install MACT is technology based not risk based • Technologies may be available that reduce costs for removing odorand also control toxic emissions • Sanitation Districts spend approximately $3 million annually operating odor control scrubbers Air Toxics Co'k . ,rol Technology Control Strategies Available To POTWs • Traditional control strategies - Often not cost-effective - Cross-media impacts • Untraditional control strategies - Should be focus of POTWs risk reduction program - Requires research to define performance and reliability Air Toxics Control Technology Traditional Control Strategies Available to POTWs • scrubbers • incineration e condensation • Often not cost-effective • Limited effectiveness • Cross-media impacts Air Toxics Col . ..rol Technology Potential Control Strategies Available to POTWs • Looking for cost-effective solution - Source control - Operational modifications - Physical modifications Biofiltration • Should be focus of POTW's risk reduction program • Requires research to define performance, reliability and cost Air Toxics Control Technology Research On Potential Control Strategies • Required to cost-effectively implement risk reduction measures • May have secondary benefit in reducing emissions of other pollutants of concern • Usually requires significant lead-time to complete; therefore, Staff proposes to undertake research on biofiltration Air Toxics Cot .rol Technology Biofiltration Technology • Vapor-phase treatment technology • Biological process for removing odors, toxics and VOCs with microorganisms • No or limited cross-media impact • Low operating costs Air Toxics Control Technology Pro Posed Biofiltration Project • Demonstration project consists of five steps: -Literature search and review II -Development of Experimental Protocol III -Bench-scale testing program IV -Pilot-scale testing program V -Conceptual design report and cost estimates for a full-scale biofilter Air Toxics Cot .rol Technology Proposed Biofiltration Project O Test removal efficiency for - Hydrogen sulfide - Reactive organic compounds - Toxics • Plant 1 headworks is the proposed test site Air Toxics Control Technology Proposed Biofiltration Project Team • Sanitation Districts • University of Southern California • Schaefer Dixon Associates • Analytical Laboratory Air Toxics Coi . _rol Technology Proposed Biofiltration Project Schedule • Project Duration - 1 .5 years • Begin work in December 1992 S Complete work in April-May 1994 Air Toxics Control Technology Proposed Biofiltration Pro"ect Cost Description Cost Internal Labor and benefits $62 ,000 Travel $59000 Equipment & Materials $39,000 Contract services • USC $805800 • SDA $ 35200 • Laboratory $655000 • Construction contractor 25 000 TOTAL 280 000 ( ' Air Toxics Col . .rol Technology Proposed Biofiltration Pro"ect - Expected Outcome • Demonstrate reliability of biofiltration to remove low concentration of toxic & VOC emissions • Develop engineering parameters necessary to design full-scale biofilter • Pursue funding to design and construct full- scale biofilter Air Toxics Control Technology Proposed Biofiltration Project - Expected Outcome s Cost effective control strategy for POTWs • May satisfy BACT and MACT requirements • A technology with limited cross-media impacts Air Toxics Col .rol Technology Proposed Biofiltration Project Funding • Proposals for co-funding were sent to : - Water Environment Research Foundation - South Coast Air Quality Management District Air Toxics Control Technology Proposed Biofiltration Project Funding • Expect decisions on funding in November, if proposals are accepted , distribution would be as follows: Source Cost Percent SCAQMD $1249568 45 WERF $ 30 ,000 11 Sanitation Districts $1255432 44 • Southern California Edison has also expressed interest in project. No funding decision at this time . i Air Toxics Control Technology Staff Recommendations • Authorize staff to conduct the biofiltration demonstration project to study the performance of biofilters for treating toxic, volatile organic and odorous compounds from our off-gases • Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with USC for services pertaining to the biofiltration demonstration project in an amount not to exceed $80 ,800 Air Toxics Control Technology Staff Recommendations • Authorize staff to secure the services of construction contractors to construct the necessary support facilities to conduct pilot testing of the biofiltration demonstration project (estimated amount is $25 ,000) • Authorize staff to secure the services of contract analytical laboratories in accordance with established procurement procedures to conduct the necessary testing pertaining to the biofiltration demonstration project (estimated amount is $65,000) Air Toxics Control Technology Staff Recommendations ® Authorize staff to enter into a grant agreement with SCAQMD for partial funding of the biofiltration demonstration project in the amount of $124,568 • Authorize staff to enter into a grant agreement with the Water Environment Research Foundation for partial funding of the biofiltration demonstration project in the amount of $30,000 Air Toxics Control Technology Staff Recommendations • Staff will report back to the Boards on the grant applications from SCAQM ® , WERF and SCE COUNTY SANITATION DISTNICTS of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA RE: AGENDA ITEM NO . 13 10844 ELLIS AVENUE October 29 , 1992 PO BO[Bfn FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIAOUWA 92728.B122 91u962.2a11 REPORT OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE Meeting Date: October 29 , 1991 -- 5 : 30 p.m. COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT: Present: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Norman E. Culver, Chairman Thomas M. Dawes, Fred Barrera Director of Engineering John Collins Blake P. Anderson, Barry Denes Director of Technical Don R. Griffin Services Eva G. Miner Carrey Nelson Richard Partin Charles Sylvia Jim Wahner James Flora Jack Kelly Jim Silva ...� Absent: Miguel Pulido 1 . ACTIONS RE OPERATIONS CENTER EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB 90. P2-23-5-1 . On October 6 , nine bids were received for the expansion of the existing Operations Center at Plant No. 2 . The work included the addition of new locker rooms, offices, and remodeling of existing rooms, as well as a cart storage area. Since the bid opening, three protests have been submitted by The Gorham Co. , Corona, CA, second low bidder; Lewis Jorge Construction Management Inc. , Baldwin Park, CA, third low bidder; and Dover Elevator Company, Anaheim, CA. , a supplier. Dover has since withdrawn their protest. Enclosed is a Staff Report dated October 22, 1992 (tan) which provides additional information and copies of correspondence received on the bid. Counsel has recommended that we reject the low bid (see attached Memorandum dated October 23 , 1992) . Staff has ..r recommended rejecting all bids and rebidding the project. Report of the Building Committee ' October 29, 1992 Page Two Following a discussion regarding the protests and the options available to the Districts relative to awarding the bid to the second low bidder versus rejecting all bids and rebidding the project, the following actions were recommended. Recommendation• 1 . That the Boards approve Addenda 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 . The addenda provide additional technical clarification to the plans and specifications and extend the date for receipt of bids. 2. That the Boards reject all bids, and authorize the General Manager to establish the bid date for Job No. P2-23-5-1(Rebid) . A tentative bid date of December 8, 1992 is anticipated. 2. TOUR OF NEW CENTRAL LABORATORY The new Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17 , is complete and was accepted by the Directors at the last Board meeting. A short tour of the facility was conducted. The members that went on the tour were pleased with the facility. TMD:jt ENG/BLOG.C"/BCR.1092 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA October 22, 1992 +QBC<ELLIS AVENUE 00 8Z 9127 FWNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127 n1n962.2A11 STAFF REPORT Protests Filed on Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2 Job No. P2-2 -5-1 This project, the expansion of the Operations Center at Plant No. 2, includes the addition of new locker rooms, offices and remodeling existing rooms, as well as the addition of a cart storage area. On October 6, 1992, nine bids were received, ranging from a high of $3,238,400 to a low of $2,537,193 submitted by Javaid Contractors, Inc. Since the bid opening three protests have been received from general counsel for The Gorham Co. , the second low bidder (pink attachment) , Lewis Jorge Construction Management Inc, the third low bidder (gray attachment) and Dover Elevator Company, a supplier (salmon attachment). Dover Elevator Company has since withdrawn their protest (green attachment). The protests are based on two separate issues. The first is bidding irregularities contained in the low bidder's proposal alleging violations of the Public Contracts Code Section 4100 which requires that the prime contractor list the name, license number and location of each subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the General Contractor in or about the construction of the improvements in an amount in excess of one-half of one percent of the General Contractor's total bid, and the portion (type) of the work which will be done by each subcontractor. The second issue is the lack of bonding capacity by the Surety listed on the low bidder's proposal. In addition to the above protests, correspondence has been received (purple attachment) from the Center for Contract Compliance alleging violations of Labor Code 1774 (payment of prevailing wages) by the low and second bidders on other jobs within this region, and substantially more severe allegations against the second bidder ranging from poor workmanship and excessive change order requests to actual termination of contract by another agency in Southern California. Counsel has reviewed the protests and the allegations and has submitted an opinion dated October _, 1992 (ivory). In light of all the complex issues which could arise by awarding this contract to the low bidder, staff and Counsel are recommending that all bids be rejected and the project rebid at the earliest possible date after approval of the plans and specifications which will incorporate the changes in Addenda 1 and 2 as Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1(Rebid). SR.1092.2 LEVINE & ERIKSEN ATTORNEYN AT LAW �RCO LfRIRBEN 2660NORTH 5ANTIAOO BOULEVARD MARC R.LEVINE ORANGE,CALIFORNIA 92667 ANTHONY C-MORGA'i TELEPHONE 1714)974-0100 FAC£IMII•n PII41974.6972 VIA U.S. MAIL AND FACSIMILE 0 14) 962-5018 October 7, 1992 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127 Attention: Tom Dawes Re.: Our Client: The Gorham Company, Inc. Project: Operations Center Expansion Plant No. 2 Subject: Protest of Bid Submitted by Javaid Contractors, Inc. Dear Mr. Dawes: our firm is general counsel to The Gorham Company. We have been asked to review the bids submitted to the Orange County Sanitation District in connection with the above-referenced project, our review indicates that the apparent low bidder for the project is Javaid Contractors, Inc. The apparent second low bidder is The Gorham Company, Inc. A review of the Javaid bid indicates certain irregularities which in our opinion render their bid unresponsive. Pages 8 of your Proposed Form of Bid for the above-referenced project states the applicable law with respect to this issue in the bid document. This language is derived from Public Contracts Code Section 4100 and states: "Any officer, department, board or commission taking bids for the construction of any public work or improvement shall provide in the specifications prepared for the work or improvement or in the general conditions under which bids will be received for the doing of the work incident to the public work or improvement that any person making a bid or offer to perform the work, shall, in hie or her bid or offer, set forth: (a) The name and the location of the place of business of each subcontractor who will perform work or _C�11VC b LM11hJ C�V i. i14�Oi ti"'OJi � IJ� i 111 I I i.0 .II+ . � County Sanitation Districts of orange County Attn: Tom Dawes Re: our Client: The Gorham Company, Inc. Project: operations Center Expansion Plant No. 2 Subject: Protest of bid submitted by Javaid Contractors, Ina. Page Two October 7, 1992 labor or render service to the prime contractor in or about the construction of the work or improvement, or a subcontractor licensed by the State of California who, under subcontract to the prime contractor, specially fabricates and installs a portion of the work or improvement according to detailed drawings contained in the plans and specifications, in an amount in excess of 1/2 of 1t of the prime contractor's total bid or, in the case of bids or offers for the construction of streets or highways, including bridges, in excess of 1/2 of 1t of the prime contractor's total bid or $10,000.00, whichever is greater. $' Public Contract Code requires the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County to utilize competitive bidding after publication of notices inviting bids when the amount of work is in a sum such as that involved in this project. Javaid Contractors, Inc. 's bid fails to list the subcontractors who are to perform the following categories of work: 1. Dewatering. 7. Toilet Accessories. 2. Demolition. S . Elevator Installation. 9 . Reber. 9. Lockers and Benches. 4. Acoustical Ceilings. 10. Fire Sprinkler. 5. Toilet Partitions. 11. Site utilities. 6. Shower Partitions. 12. Roll-Up Grilles. Public Contracts Code Section 4106 states that: "If a prime contractor fails to specify a subcontractor or if a prime contractor specifies more than one subcontractor for the same portion of work to be performed under County sanitation Districts of Orange County Attn: Tom Dawes Re: Our Client: The Gorham Company, Inc. Project: Operations Center Expansion Plant No. 2 Subject: Protest of bid submitted by Javaid Contractors, Inc. Page Three October 7 , 1992 contract in excess of 1/2 of It of the prime contractor's total bid, the prime contractor agrees that he or she is fully qualified to perform that portion himself or herself, and that the prime contractor shall perform that portion himself or herself." "If after award of contract, the prime contractor subcontracts, except as provided for in Sections 4107 or 4109, any such portion of the work, the prime contractor shall be subject to the penalties named in Section 4111. " Public Contracts Code Section 4109 provides that: r..� "Subletting or subcontracting of any portion of the work in excess of 1/2 of 1% of the prime contractor's total bid as to which no subcontractor was designated in the original bid shall only be permitted in cases of public emergency or necessity, and then only after a finding reduced to writing as a public record of the awarding authority setting forth the facts constituting the emergency or necessity." It is the reasonable belief of The Gorham Company that Javaid Contractors, Inc. does not intend to, nor do they have the qualifications to, perform the trades for which they have failed to list subcontractors as set forth above. It is believed that each of these particular portions of the construction work will exceed in value one-half (1/2) of one percent (14) of the total contract amount. From practical experience, I can confidently state that an elevator manufacturer will only supply elevator equipment to a project if the manufacturer is permitted also to install it. I cannot see any rational basis under which Javaid Contractors, Inc. or the County Sanitation Districts of orange County believes that Javaid Contractors, Inc. will provide and install the .elevator equipment in this project. themselves. I am sure you can draw the same reasonable conclusions regarding the other unlisted categories. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Attn: Tom Dawes �..i Re: Our client: The Gorham Company, Inc. Project: Operations Center Expansion Plant No. 2 Subject: Protest of bid submitted by Javaid Contractors, Inc. Page Four October 7, 1992 As I am sure you are aware, the subcontractor listing law was enacted by the legislature based on their finding that the practice of job bidding and bid pedaling in connection with the construction of public improvements deprives the public of the full benefits of fair competition among prime contractors and subcontractors. In fact, this legislative finding is set forth in Public Contracts Code Section 4101. Furthermore, a stiff penalty is provided in the Public Contracts Code for those prime contractors who choose to circumvent the requirement of listing subcontractors. I would refer you above to the quotation from Public Contracts Code section 4106 which refers to Public Contracts Code Section 4110. That section provides a penalty against the prime contractor who violates this subcontractor listing law of having their contract canceled or the prime contractor assessed a penalty in an amount of not more than ten percent (104) of the amount of the subcontract involved. A violation of this particular subcontractor listing law also subjects Javaid Contractors, Inc. to disciplinary action by the Contractors State License Board pursuant to Public contracts Code Section 4111. The Gorham Company, in submitting its bid to the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, strictly complied with all laws regulating the presentation of their bid. In lieu of this, they are the lowest "responsible" bidder on this project. By this letter, we are hereby requesting that you reject the bid of Javaid Contractors, Inc. My client trusts that the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County will continue to uphold the legislative intent of Public Contracts Code with respect to competitive bidding and subcontractor listing laws. Also, as shown by the enclosed copy of the Federal Register dated July 1, 1992, M.C.A. Insurance Company has an Underwriting Linitation of $2,397,000.00. The bid submitted by Javaid Contractors, Inc. was $2 ,537, 193.00. Therefore, Javaid will not be able to provide bonds under these conditions. we would appreciate your communication to this office of your intention with respect to this matter so that appropriate action may be taken on my client's behalf. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Attn: Tom Dawes Re: Our Client: The Gorham Company, Inc. Project: Operations Center Expansion Plant No. 2 Subject: Protest of bid submitted by Javaid Contractors, Inc. Page Five October 7, 1992 I trust you will take the appropriate action. ycu "' er truly, M• r R. virie M :mw cc: The Gorham Company 29880 Fedend Rphtse I Val, 57. No. IV / Wedne.d■y, July i. 7o01 / Notion s,ratcoru ORNMRAL IltsinkXCt CO"AWY. BUSINESS ADDRESS: 2330 Whiteford Road, York, ?A 17402. UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $bell/ 000. SURETY LICENSES O/: AL, GA, ID, IN, IA, KS, KF, LA, MD, MS. NO, NE, NV, NM, ND, ON, OR, PA, SC, SD, TN, UT, VA, WV, WY. INCORPORATEt TH: Pennaylvenia. Lendea AssuraAes et Anoxiea Ina. (The) .5/ BUSINESS ADDRESS: 10 East 50th Street, 27th Floor, NOW York, NY 10022. UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $17,185,000. SURETY LICENSES C/t AS, IA, ME, MI, MN, NJ, NY, ND, ON, UT, VT. INCORPORATED IN: Now York. Luxbsxashs Mutual Casualty OsmpaaY, BUSINESS ADDRESS: 1 Kemper Drive, Long Grove, IL 50049-0001. UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: 4105,148,000. SURETY LICENSES C/: AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, DC, FL, CA, MI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, NO, N^, N8, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, MC, ND, ON, 09, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, IN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI, WY. INCOMRAT£D IN: Illinois. MASS40husetts say Insuraaos Cmpany. BUSINESS ADDRESS: 100 North Parkway, Worcester, MA 01605. UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/t $1,307,900. SURETY LICENSES a/: At,, AR, CA, CO, CT, DC, FL, GA, IL, IN, IA, KS, XY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, NO, NE, NC, NJ, NY, NC, ON, OK, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI. INCORPORATED IN: Massachusetts. NOA Insurance CGspeh . BUSINESS ADDRESS: 484 Central AveDus, Newark, NJ 07107-2096. UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $2,397,000. SURETY LICENSES c/t AL, AX, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, DC. FL, GA, NI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, TY, LA, ME, MD, MA, NI, MN, MS, No, MT, WE, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, we, ND, ON, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV, WI, WY. INCORPORATED IN: Oklahoma. Merchants Beading Company (Mutual) . BUSINESS ADDRESS: 2100 Grand AVsnua, Dee Moines, IA 50312 . UNDERWRITINO LIMITATION b/: $922,000. SURETY LICENSES 0/9 AL, AZ, CA, CO, FL, GA, ID, I , IN, IA, KS, LA, M1, 10, NO, MT, NE, NV, NM, NC. ND, OK, 01, PA, 90, TX, UT, VA, WA, WI, WY. INCORPORATED IN: IOWR. Miohigan Killers Mutual Insurance COAPUY. BUSINESS ADDRESS: Post Office Box 30060, Laming, MI 4890t . UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $6,352, 000. SURETY LICENSES c/: AZ, AR, CA, CO, DC, FL, 10, IN, KS, KY, MI, No, NE, NJ, NY, NO, ON, OK, PA, TX, UT, VA, WA. INCORPORATED :0; Michigun. See Footnotes at and of circular. TOTOL P.OB LEWIS JORGE October 6, 1992 Ms. Rita J. Brown Secretary Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92708 RE: Project No. P2-23-5-1 Dear Ms. Brown: Please accept this letter as our formal protest regarding the competitive bids received for the Operations Expansion at Plant No. 2. The apparent (2) low bidder's did not completely list all of the required information on the bid form. They have excluded the subcontractors license number either in part or entirely for each trade. Therefore, we feel that these two bids should be disqualified for non compliance with the bid form requirements. Please advise me of the pending action which the Board of Directors will take on this matter. Very truly yours, LEWIS JORGE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC. Robert M. Lewis President RML/sm 5140 Commerce Drm•901e91a Pars-CA•91706•i818)814.4727 •Fay(818)814-3048 •License'8.473790•General Connacror/Consmrdion Manager - .: ,.m "ROM DOVEICO ORAPIGE CiY RO2.'02 ELEVATORS DOWER ELEVATOR COMPANY 280E flloeer Way Anaheim, calltornle SM (71 4)68E-Ml Fur:(711)ON-2078 October 8 , 1992 county Sanitation District of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain. Valley, CA 92728-8127 Attn: Tom Dawes Subject: Water Treatment Plant Operation Center Building Dear John: This letter is to inform you, that Dever Elevator company, is in protest of Javaid contractors being awarded a contract for the Water Treatment Plant Operation Center Building in Huntington Beach. Our office phoned in a bid for the proposed elevator to Javaid Contractors on October 6, 1992 , but they still failed to list an elevator contractor in their bid. since Javaid Contrac- tors can not build an elevator without an elevator contractor, we do not understand how they will be able to fulfill your contract requirements. Dover Elevator Company asks that you please recon- sider Javaid Contractors proposed bid, before you choose to award them a contract. Sincerely, Dover Elevatoor� Company �I /� Gro Rocco Aracri Sales Representative 10-16-22 '10:24 PM FROM DOYEICO ORANGE CTY F02/02 1 EUVATORS DOWER ELEVATOR COMPANY 2M Ricker Way Anaheim, California OM p14)"0-1331 Pax:(714)004078 October 16, 1992 county Sanitation District of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127 ATTH$ Tom Dawes SUBJ: Water Treatment Plant Operation Center Building Huntington Beach, CA Dear Tom$ This letter is to inform you, that Dover Elevator Company has been in contact with Javaid contractors, in regards to the Water Treatment Plant Operation Center located in Huntington Beach, CA. Javaid Contractors has informed us, that they had every intent to list an elevator contractor on the proposed project. Javaid Con- tractors did not list an elevator contractor in their bid be- cause, they felt that the cost of the elevator would be less than 1\2%, which would not have required them to list an elevator con- tractor. Javaid Contractors has informed Dover Elevator Company, that they will issue us a contract for the proposed elevator, if they are awarded the contract. Dover Elevator company apologizes for any misunderstanding that our protest letter may have caused and would have no objections to working with Javaid Contractors on this project. If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, ,,,,"�� � Rocco /yrJ sari �� Sales Representative •R M A N q 9 p QF � 0 4 z 9 9 �+ October 15, 1992 , r E P Jew CENTER FOR CONTRACT COMPLIANCE Mr. Carrillo Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Ave Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 "Absolute Privilege" RE: Water Treatment Plant Operation Center Bldg Expansion @ Plant 2 (P22351) CONTRACTOR: Javaid Contractors Inc Dear Mr. Carrillo: As you may be aware, the Center for Contract Compliance (CCC) is a non-profit organization concerned with those laws that govern public works construction. To achieve this objective, the CCC works closely with awarding agencies entrusted with the enforcement of those laws. one of the services the CCC offers awarding agencies are the results of our investigations which include, but are not limited to, on-site worker interviews, Certified Payroll Record audits, past violations (Labor Code, Public Contract Code, License, etc. . . ) and numerous other types of information that are compiled during those thorough investigations. That information, of course, can be critically useful in an awarding agencies contract decision making process. The purpose of this letter is to inform your agency that some discrepancies have been discovered concerning the above referenced contractors "Sub-List". Please review the following: Contractor Portion of Work Tri-Con Earthwork & Concrete Attached You will find copies of "Stop Notices" issued by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement against Tri-Con the listed subcontractor of record for Javaid Contractors Inc. , the apparent low bidder. Please note the amounts are rather large and all are for non-payment of prevailing wage, showing a continuous history of total disregard for the Public Works Labor Code. 205 W. Fin!Street. Suite 104 0 Tustin CA 92680• i714 730.9620 0 Fax (7141730.964" v U Contractor Portion of Work McKinney Construction Steel Stud/Drywall & Plastering Once again we've attached copies of a "Stop Notice" issued by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement against McKinney Construction another listed subcontractor of record for Javaid Contractors Inc. , the apparent low bidder. This is proof and verification of the findings of our on-site interviews which deemed that McKinney Construction does not pay prevailing wage. Due to the facts and information provided, the Center for Contract Compliance requests that Javaid Contractors Inc. be deemed "Non Responsive" and they be removed as the "Low Bidder" for this project. It is our pleasure to work with agencies such as yours to insure equity and fair play in the competitive bid process. Working together, we can insure that all "Le itimate" contractors have a chance when bidding against less scrupulous ones. Thank you for your stringent attention to this matter and i am looking forward to your response. If you have any questions regarding our investigation, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, CENTER FOR CONTRACT COMPLIANCE Alex Esparza Field Investigator AE/rp cc: Mr. Jim Lintern, Director, CCC Mr. Roger Miller, Regional Manager, USE Legal Council �ABOR COMMISSIONER,STATE OF CALIFORNIA eefnmanl of Indugrifl Relations Ow.den or Label standard\Entafcement' B 1 OF FIELD ENFORCEMENT C 1 v D IA_ JlN IlO.Ow.f, Will Recto MAR 1 o +NOusr,� los Moak. a M32 3 1992 ♦ .....wfu: .,,,4! pth 49C+FRlt 897-2905 4'1 ' C.C.C_ r State of California, Dept. of Gen. Serv. Office-of the State Architect 400 r'PI' St., 5th Fl. °ar cALtrpP .Sacramento, CA 95814 L _1 e.rv, —•�. �.-- ...u.•,ease re a�:: :.—T'_.... March 12, 1992 26-PW-21715/739 NOTICE TO WITHHOLD f x.xs r ee4i...f Leo Carrillo Stato Bunch - Campground to-finb, - CIMLrn:t 10777 .0 etexr�i.e fni.��_ ._.-..«.._ .�..-.��.- .� �.... .. ... .. .. .. ... .... ... Triton, Inc. (4181 Sunsweps Dr. , Sfodio City, CA 911`04) SouthueAt Buitdera Clod), Inc. ( 11344 - 6L6 St. , 1102. Sfmin Muuicn, CA 91)401) i Eoclosrd are a NO'riCE OF WAGES OWED and NOTICE OF ITNAI : Y ASSESSMENT pertaining for the above•named protect. You re doected to withhold and retain from any paymentsj�ee due ilia t wral cn NW nlimlor the total nutt of S�01,101.85. whim .s the sum of all wades and ppanallics Iotfeilod putsuanl to the provienns of Labor Coda Section 1727 as evudonced by the attached pinlice ill Wag#%Ovend anrd Notice($) of N.natfy Assessment. IL /ou receive notice of a suit filed by the contractor to recover the prevailing wages and/or the Penalties La at Code Section 1731 requires you retain the above stated sum pending the outcome of the suit. It no such notice of suit is received within the 90 day AS office. cesfap.tn acceptance,or compietion of the project, all monies withheld shall be remitted to AS office. If within the aloremenlioned period• the contractor consents in writing with the Notice of Wages Owed and/or Nrttice of Penally Assessment, the amount withheld shall be remitted to this office. I declare under penalty of perjury ay follows: I am an authorized rep.esentalive acting for the State Labor Commissioner. 1 exacule this Declaration on behalf of the worAr•,s whose names all. set forth on Ill* attached AOtices. I have read the foragniog Notice !o Withhold and I have made an imesltg7lion of the facts relating thereto• and based on all the facts known to me at this time and based an all o111he statements and information given to me at this time. I am informed and believe that the foregoing Notice to Withhold Is true and correct, and that the facts have been found to support this Notice. Sincerely. STATE LABOR COMMISSIONER By t4aa.CC—.':ae ....... Labor Standards Investigator aw ,t nlol NOf,te fO wIINNOLO LABOR COMMISSIONER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I I' Daparfinent of Imru6lnal Relaoone DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT I I t Bureau of Palo Enforcement Sr,N� °` {y ^` t07S0ne6roadivay,Rm4iIiII1iSb!9 Los AnSelea,CA 90012(;aS)Sf1y^-df&f —. Q J tF .0 r LAS VIRCENRS MUNICIPAL 'WATER DISTRICT ATTN : DAVID R. LIPPMAN 4232-LAS VIRCENES ROAD L CALABASAS, CA 91302-1994 J JULY 29, 1992 2ti-PN-21715/739 NOTICE OF PENALTY ASSESSMENT REC . F4C. EYPNS . LY , SLUDGE FORCE PAIR r .c OUTNNFST BUILDLNG CLUB, INC. + T ICON OENF.RAL BUILDING-Co _ _ _—_— _"_' _ This office has determined that the above-named contractorlsl has faired to pay the prevailing wages as mQuired by Labor Code Sections 1774 ana 1815 to laborers ana!or mechanics engaged in the execution of the above public works contract. Therefore, the following assessment is made per Labor Code Sections 1775 and 1813: 158A) Penalties for straight time work paid it!less than the prevailing-sage(ale atS25per worker per day per violation equals S22�20_9 -U rs L Penalties for overtime worked but not paid at me premium prevailing wage rate at $25 per worker per day per violation equals S 1 .850.00 Penalties for failure to keep and/or lurnish required payroll records at S25 per worker per day per violation equals S -._.—_ (55 Total number of violations. Total sum due 5'31 ,050.00 This Notice is given pursuant to the provisions of Section 1727 or the Labor Code. You are nereby required to withhold any and all payments which are now or hereafter may become due 10 the Contractor hdreinabove named to the extent of the total claim as heremabove shown. Executed on IULY 29 . 19')2 at LOS ANGELES , California. STATE LABOR COMMISSIONER By N. C, I..S . I . ~61NEv6-.-q fyv: nMtaq P�n/M1,AuuvtM ASOR COMMISSIONER,STATE Of CALIFORNIA J—` - ee��Frtment of Illdatlrial Relevant Iv,Sron of Laenr SMaaaree Enfereelnent ' BURS OF FIELD ENFORCEMENT 107 1 09000MAY. Suitt 5439 d 1NOUSTq. 'Oki 11e0[t3. CA M19 1 ..•-'wili�•• W ;2131 e20.2200 I �,�,•�• •''••�•p , Broer: I LAS VMIGENES MWICIPAL WATER DIMICP ' ATIN: DAVID R. LIPPMAN sA�Ft. eater r 4232 LAS VIRGENFS ROAD °ttAL'r CALABASAS, CA 91302-1094 ) l__ J .,awG l73H.. ,a..e.• JIILY 29, 1992 j ��6�7d-?1715 • • NOTICE TO WITHHOLD .•u,caie..0 r tee��,e•,v+ee+ ..-- __—._ .. ._�_-_ �. RErIONAL FACILITY _%P.a.NS10N Ty, ,LlflXZ FORCE NAIi! SOU'1•IIhtST BUILD1.1G CLUB, TNC. l T.RTCON GC•NrRAL BUILDING CO. Enclosed are 3 NOTICE OF WAGES OWED anti NOTICE OF PENAL./ ASSESSMENT Pertaining !0 the above-named project. V v I ,)Ct,,d.2f—e1 to withhold and retain Lem any dayfnanls dua the gtpa,al contractor the total amount df j a1y.- 9—_— 'whlCn 's ale turn of 311 wages and penal ties 'nt le.tad pursuant to the provisions Of Labor Cade Section 1727 as evidenced by the atlacnea of Ct of^ragas ..wed and Notica(s) of Penalty Assessment. If gu face"*rintrca of a suit !Fled by the contractot to rocaver:he p:evmbrtg wages and/or :he Penalets La for Coca St:d.0 u n 1731 roques Iron retain *ne above statee sum oenang the outcome of the suit. It no SUC nOLCti of salt is received ithin the 9f1 day pperWd 3f:er CeSsat:oo acceptance. or completion or the protect, all .ninnies Nonald shall a* remitted to (?,is orrice. If .,thin the ifoforhantloned oei rod, the contractor consents 'n writing with the Nottce of Wages Owed anc:or Nri:ce of Penalty Assessment, the amount withheld snail be ten111ted to this office. I cec!are under penalty of pequey As follows: I am An Julhod.4ed refutsalltative acting for the State Labor Commissioner. 7 execute this 0eeiaraCon On Cenalf of the -or:re-s whose names ate set !otfh on the attaened notices. I nave read the foregoing Notice to Withhold and I have made an investigation of the facts relating thereto, and based on all the facts +nOwn to me at this time and based on all of me statements and information given io me at !hd time. i am informed and believe that (he foregoing .aolice to Wtthnmd is true and correct, and th a: the facts have been found to support this Aobce. Sincerely. STATE LABOR COMMISSIONER By •w" •� Mill OOT,ea TONITMXOLO LABOR COMMISSIONER. STATE OF CALIFORNIA Department of Industrial Reatons DIVISION OF LABOR STANOAROS ENFORCEMENT 1 Bureau of Field Enforcement OF EpL OF. 7h 107 South Broadway.Rns5101 5,. •'tuhi1K P �• LOe Angeles,CA 90012 �a.13�a44 YfRf Q yt a\ 1 m TO: _ s'SH At, O r LAS VTRGENP.S MUNICIPAL WATER DIST,1 A'•;, f ATTN: DAVID R . L'IPPMAN :f ' 4232 LAS VIRGENES ROAD Cq LIFp RNLI L CALABASAS . CA 91302-1994 J DATE: JULY 29 , 1992 InpITWRe�e�s�� rnber. NOTICE OF WAGES OWED Contract Number Sub•Cunnactor : r_�, I -F66N-.C^NE{,1L, ' UI-1,44,1YC_C0 . Ocneral Conuactor SOUTHWEST BII'1LDTN ' CLUB INC. . IRolect Name and Adress RRG , PAC. "t%P. IV, SLUDGE FORCE MAZY _ Please take notice that the p wn(s) named on Zzhibit'A•.attached hereto and mace a part hereof, have performed lalxx as stated on Exhibit"A"for the sub•conaaetor or generaul conaactur,named above,or other person($) acting by your authority on the work of improvement in progress or being completed at your properry at the project shown above. Total vaaae of the labor so performed is the sum PS�J'—=3, •9- and no payments have been made for Ume foregoing abor except as indicated on Exhibit 'A",and there now remains due,owing and unpaid 19_,SAC,detlucUng all Just credits and offsets. The labor wits performed for and furnished to tht above named general eoneactoron thc above named project, This Noubc is given pursuant to Uhe provisions of section 1727 of the Labor Coda. You sre hereby required pursuant to said section to withhold any and all payments which are or hercofter may become due to the contractor hcrvINbove Mrnad to the extent of the total claim as hertinabove shown. JULY 29 92 LOS ANGELES Exeemed on California STATE LABOR COOMMMMIIISSIONER By _s 011 JBR M. UIIWENBEC , L.S . I . NY n prHm NOTICE Or WAGES OWED Z. i j!'•'T_ 4 OWN I+ ' �•.. I � h.; }4tl t CABO�FOF°i�.Ii�S iFIFJ�RaSTATE OF�ALIFOPPIIA�i +'`�4u pt. 'r6''� tn ai' �.�a�''C. ��� e aN.Dfar Bgi{A;I a.htra�, - � nDf�li�.BlirTdirds knfOK[ 'u, ;u+*�jy,Y �ra t'F'T.' yaYi� •. r � k �^ .• , t�r .a. ' e'T ' a r i1°fin N .le,4z5 rY ff haul a tF#Dusrp 5 t jr •wenorxo ao n � Y � C y o � _ g 'a • eec � y ' ���}r. by i $OSq$feaE,SAve „1 y orcALu r t:eg na Beach"MCa 92651+ i ' PgAEMEi{RM, Wide row'n .az�ta�ts oAnn may', r w o,play.•. Ix snyl,Niraw,,�aurnuraav . erc' h�'.,, tO"tC19924e: . )G c�'i4aY . .::sev. Re'F'J. �.t, .. 7�'W0572 79r ". :'" }C94 f ` ', • °I r ry..tl.6 yid Sr{' r,` J4;tiIF'}tiif'47r , 3I 2a' i, "1g$'s�y si A`M DED { w 0 iCy:TO I H O 199 'ii{f W. 1,, �,rfl 7n8dnhWRA'R> ii Nb!ikJ$(de r'9e 7!kf .V'�� ilvmM ��' aoam.Axe IY....... xuw.aN. , « •ia:g rGt.�ry 1^'{' n - tl:r r :r.fj' liauiie ° ieechaC�.�'' ��eppr�,�{{ x�i %Ad��� a ' 43i ° r » .`. } 't! 'n•i . Ceri B�11 'Renove on , d onwt �v.-, AoGi a.. °•., .i:..� rana.aoxTaAernN - iu Dre ,�1 �7,,f u �, li • 1 ( I [• i #'Be e B ers f ;!r v,:Moi lldlc�Sj 5� f n a« 'Fd �"�t •s�L�yt IVaK'ONTNACTONy •t�� } °• t ;gin ey .0 s c yi on "avt� r ` maw y tR !n+;,aWET,!')a " ' '�Y �q�OTICE.OF W GES b24 VJEOa ' IT CE OFr'Eg".Y ASSESr ambra ict9h ixR f { ..i}• a+Yt} r 4#isyi/Qy;?d � _ 1 ,,T # °y 7t'T' AOr` t' sp t •'!Q('¢N r. 'n ,�a�" ^V4o ra• F c e o wl[nfflia�l1 and a am row� ap a manj d T genei1i n rac he toEa� Y° -op$ which It the,' 0 5II Cade a d be altle3 forfe1t,d pursuant to theprowslons of #� A L'abor,CSBe SectiorTel 27/5rbJldencl•d'b�' e'3t1ahCdN(�iceofWages Owed andNotice#s) of Penalt211.1 VI j $ , ia'a .�u,� I` �, o , ee99 a r)o to o a . Ile y, a con rac or o IIecover a prevailing wages an/or �+en�s13M i oF1.CSdd'Sectibn 731s'regUffes`yI .tetilHIth4,abovaLstated;sUrnpendingtheoutcomeot,thetult, if r Fa no }JEEM h cite, d 3terved, thlrh1ha 901fay"g lod a(teF C Issationpacceptance;of completion jr obr a8 p81 BNI1 'CJ1�hIshhelds#hs ybee re I�tea.tb i offloe �f yvltnin the afore 6rltioned enotl+`(he + 7 pfrac @F tbh q jlr1lWFlflhg'WIW' h � of t"~a 61 Owed�e r 4 ke of e�altJ;AsseismehA•'(fie.,s t'. W( amaJnt w hheld all be Femltt2dd t61216 Icf elr 'pluln ervoi a 9' Xff , oll : 'ti i4 Jf. v 2• a fY 4r �N_, } i deelare,under penal�y of Port�,•a3�fo��ows am, n•auf�ior zer presen Etivle attl r 4he Stllla�e": A Labor.Commits 7 execute tt is Declaration n;behalf of the workers whose names are set forth on I the attached notices ''.I„have read;the foregoing-No ice to Withhold and I have made an investigation of the facts relating thereto and.based,on all the;tacts know to me at this time and based on all of the -stattements and Information given to,mel yti,�h ls,time I arrt'p+Informed and bel lave that the foregoing INotice to tWlthholdf If true an tl correOpend t a t e btts have been found to support this Notice �t2�Li�Wr• t:r 4• I " SinterBy F'� }'il* STATE BOR COS I • !� cc,,.. ( ♦ �rJ+' _. .. ydie Fsilkerson " a '. �iuy• a �` Ai<t'- �I r z�.1�a; ro,` -I�'�k�'�s �>R r � �_„•�___ iw_r_I�ryil NDTIC[ TO WITIiMOLD W n1 MAN, 0 t• c F z y 9 9 4 �L y , re . P J CENTER FOR CONTRACT COMPLIANCE October 15, 1992 Mr. Carrillo Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Ave Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 "Absolute Privilege" RE: Water Treatment Plant Operation Center Bldg Expansion @ Plant 2 (P22351) CONTRACTOR: The Gorham Company Inc. Dear Mr. Carrillo: fir' The Center for Contract Compliance (CCC) is a non-profit organization concerned with compliance of those laws that govern public works including, but not limited to the payment of the required prevailing wage. To achieve this objective, the CCC works closely with awarding agencies and the public agencies entrusted with the enforcement of these laws. One of the services the CCC offers to awarding agencies are the results of our investigations. This information may be useful to you in your contract decision making process. We believe the public interest is best served when public contracts are awarded to responsible and responsive bidders. The lowest responsible/responsive bidder best responds in quality, fitness and capacity to the particular requirements of the proposed work. It has come to our attention that The Gorham Company Inc. , is the second low bidder on the above mentioned project. We would like to inform you of The Gorham Company's poor performance record and history of public works violations. On the Bear Gulch Elementary School project, The Gorham Company was found to be in violation of Labor Code 1774, non payment of prevailing wages and were fined a total of $19,000.00. This project was also finished several months - behind its scheduled completion time. For more information concerning this project, please contact Ingrid Vogel at 714-989-8541. 205 W. First Stn_t S-to 104 0 Tcsen. CA 92680 0(714i 730-962C 0 Fax(714)730-9647 1 v In the City of Alhambra, Gorham was the Prime Contractor for the restoration of Fire station #72. Gorham again was found innvv olation of 1774 but wa av 1 wFian they reari2e3'"f� a CCC was on to_11iy� Tome a Iona SeUry-b�IIsl 4' eh�arndm any was hr 1m o_rfffTue--Vo excessive cnange order requests, p� oor workmanship awn — running over the hverae ails,tm at cevecomlhc 818-570-5007 and speakcon a e City with Mrs. Vangie Shock or contact the inspector, Jack Carraher, at 818-570-5044. The Gorham Company was the General Contractor on a City Hall Renovation project for the City of Signal Hill. For information regarding his performance, contact Mr. Ron Williamson, Public Works, at 213-426-7333. The City of Laguna Beach also has a project constructed by The Gorham Company and it too has some problems. First of all, three of the subcontractors on this project were found in violation of Labor Code 1774. B & M Construction was fined $6,435. 06, Ken Killinger Concrete was fined $5,845.12 and Environments West was fined a total of $2,663.00. The Gorham Company also violated sections 4106, 4107.5 and 4109 of the Public Contract Code by ewit i 1 in subcontr without notifying or POrOVal rom the 1 v. a City was a er Orange County office for further action. Also, after reviewing the subcontractor list submitted by The Gorham Company, we discovered that they were in violation of Public Contract Code 4100, et seq. The Gorham Company failed to list at least six subcontractors who will be performing work in excess of lhalf of 1 percent of the total contract price. Not listing these subcontractors at the time of bid gives The Gorham Company an unfair advantage over the other bidders because they do not have to list the prices which subsequently makes the Gorham Company's bid price much lower than the other contractors. This violation alone should show that this contractor is "Non Responsive" and they should be removed as the "second low bidder". It is at this time that the Center for Contract Compliance requests that The Gorham Company be found "Non Responsive" for their failure to comply with the Public Contract Code and for their history of poor performance as a contractor. C I{ If you need any further assistance in this matter, please feel free to call me at 714-730-9620. Sincerely, CENTER FOR CONTRACT COMPLIANCE Alex Esparta Field Investigator AE/rp Co. Mr. Jim Lintern, Director, CCC Mr. Roger Miller, Regional Manager, DLSE Legal Counsel 1A11- ��M�ISSIONER,STALE OF CALIFORNIA DrRlnrarnlo Indudrhl Rdltlenl ' Division of Labe,Shndrdl Eelemarn.nl ' BUREAU OF FIELD ENFORClishNf INDUSl ' 700 South Pack Avenua, Suit* 830-A 0 .,. ;;., , .A/q� \ Pomona, California 91766 , I 0714 .627-2267 .... ..... q l I Central School District a't. 9457' Foothill BOU.19vard +re o, 0019 Rancho Cudamongai CA 91730 November 20, 1989 26-p(V_09/,no/�o1—�_•„— NOTICE TO WITHHOLD Bear Culeh•Elementary School (Phase III) The Corham Co., Inc. Enclosed are a NOTICE OF WAGES 01'7ED and NOTICE OF PENAL'Y ASSESSMENT pertaining to Ilse above-named project. You dire t q to withhold and retain from any payments due the tiqoneral contraclor the total amount of S 2414-12.._..., which is fist sum of all wages and penalties for ailed pursuant to it,e provisions of Labor Code Section 1727 as evidenced by file attached Notice of Wages Ov ed and Notice($) of penally Assessment. It you receive nolite of a suit tiled by the contractor to recover the peevaling wages and/or the Penalties Labor Code Section 1731 requires you retain lice above staled sum panJing the outcome of the suit. It AO such notice of suit is received within the 90 day filled after cassatinn acceptance. or completion of the Proecl, all monies withheld shall be remitted to tMs office It with,, -Ae aforementioned period, tilt conlracior Consents,in willing will, the Notice of Wages OWed and/or Fichte of Penalty Assessment, the amount withhold 'shall be remitted to this office. declare undo, penal) 01 periury as follows! I am an authorized sev,ese„Iblive acting for if,* State abor Commissioner, Y execute this Declaration on behalf of the wo(k.rs whose names are set forll, on the attached notices. I have read the Jereyoinq Notice to WllIhhofd and I have made an investigation of the facts totaling thereto, and based on all Iho laels Known to me it this time and based on all of file slalemenb and informallon;given to me at this time. I am informed and believe that the foregoing Notice to and N true and correct, and [flat the facts have been found to support Ihis Notice. Sincerely, STATE LABOR COMMISSIONER r ubber ey Cap, y La or Commie Sion er COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS V BI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 108,U ELL16 AVENUE 9o.Box Z FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA BR728-B127 (7141962R411 RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS NOVEMBER 18, 1992 - 7:30 P.M. D p FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WEANING CAPITAL FNOCESSING DATE lu/ul/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CCU NTT CLAIMS PAID 10/41192 POSTING DATE 1:/17/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1250F4 AMERICAR TELEPHONE { TELEGRAPH 11.504.41 ' LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 125005 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC $50.09 LAB SERVICES 195006 ACTION RENTALS $1.844.25 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 125007 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC 647P.125.04 125008 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC t993.02 AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLIES PI-35-2, J-21 125009 AIR PROOLCTS s CHEMICAL IN s16.815.ud AIR RI CRY GEN SEB OEM PUBLICATION AGREEMENT ORY CEN 9YIR N.O.B-9-B9 D 125011 AMER SOCIETY LI CIVIL EM6R &21W.U4 PUBLICATION 123011 AMERICAM NI-I IFT t721.BB T RENTAL EQUIPMENT 145012 AM WELL II CORPORATION /390.nY 2 MACHINE PARTS p 125014 ANTHONYBLAKE P AN OERSONCONTR $97256.06 CELLULAR TELEPHONE RSIMpUR86M6NT D 125014 AN PLUS PEST CONTROL a250.61 125015 A PLUS SYSTEMS t561.69 P68R CONTROL eeRVIC88 NOTICES ERVICE A ADS REE m 12501E ABC LABORATORIES 41.300.06 SERVICE SERVICES m 125018 AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY $7.529.52 ULABNIFORM R RENT 3 18501E ABATER SERVICES NSTRUM INC 3T.529.52 MISTER RENTALS # IYS 019 AURORA INSTRUMENT t1J.661.5u METER OO 145020 AURORA PU NP f1A.,.11 MPmP ECHANICAL 125022 AUTO SHOP EOUISUPPL CO .167.05 MBCIUUIICAL RBPAIRB 125023 BC INDUSTRIAL SUP/LT INC $3,187.66 ROPE D 125024 BRN SAFETY t3.1BT.66 SAFETYRESIDUALSSUPPLIES REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91 r 125025 BAY SAF ETV { SUPPLY $2,303.67 BATTER EUPPLIBB F— 125026 BATTERY DIAGNOSTICS 53.350.34 LAB SRI88 p 12502E 0CA TEN O:AT ENTERPRISES N TES INC $1.575.00 LAB WASHSUPPLIESTIC 125021 PCACON BRD EN T[RPR IS GS INC. f1$181.82 CAR YABE EQUIPMENT y 125029 YT BILL LARD OR $560.93 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 125029 DON RAC7ATON SERVICE iSB0.9J TRUCK REPAIRS - .� 125031 BON N-RUES S91.55 TRUCK RBPAIRe t") 123032 BRERMER FIEDLERINSTRUMENT 6 ASSOC IN $1.297.32 CHLORINATION PARTS � 125033 BROOMS INSTRUMENT DIY. 53,191.78 CNLORIBIIRION BUPPLI88 fn 125034 BROWN { CALDWELL CONSULTING f53 d14.54 ERIUMIA RIND SSRVIC68 J-19 125035 BURKEER EN EMPORIUM $76.55 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 125036 BURN E' ENGINEERING CO t1.176.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 12503E BUSY AND REET) ![S INC S4.18B.0u SURVEYING SERVICES EIMBUR M.O. 6-10-92 125436 GAR" 4 STREET) $1.021.93 PETTY GIN REIMBURSEMENT 125039 CN2M HILL 31$129.31 ELECTRIRINO SERVICES 125040 C M I $325.96 LAB PASTE 125041 CRC PRESS INC $658.47 LAE SUPPLIES 1250E CS COMPAAT 9BSB.47 CHARDWARE ONFERENCE 125043 1992 CYPCA SRTC l510.04 INSTRUMENT REGISTRATION 125044 CAL SOUII EQUIPMENT CO i$29.69 IEGULATOR PARTS 125045 CALTROL INC t29.69 REGULATOR PARTS 125046 CALIF ASSOC OF BRb TOENEIE 1935.u4 REFUND REGISTRATION SPECS 12504E CALIFORNIA PORE FABRICATORS 433.15 GAYETY PLANE 6 SPECS PEES 125040 JOHN CAROLED MACHINERY .376.51 GAYETY BUPPLIEB 12504E CENT CAR SAFE ENGINEERS /1$0.637.35 BNOIRBBSUPP SERVICES P1-36, PI-38 125049 CENTURY SAFETY INST { SUPP fB.637.J5 SAFETY SUPPLIES ri b I N FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YCRBING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/ul/91 PAGE Y REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANCL CDO MTV CLAIMS PAID lu/47/92 POSTING DATE 10/07192 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT UESCRIPTION 125050 CHEN TOO LABORATORY INC t36o.ou LAB SERVICES 125051 CHEVRON USA INC 1969.8E 125052 COAST APPLIANCE PARTS $88.42 ELECTRIC PARTS SUPPLIES 125053 COASTAL CFLORINATION 1240.00 125054 COLE FARMER INSTRUMENT CO $512.13 CHLORINATION TION PARTS LAB SUPPLIES PUBLICATION 125056 COMPREE PLACEMENT COUNCIL $220.OU PUBLICATION b 12505E COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 1268.14 MACHINE BUPPLI89 m 125058 COMPUTER INC. 3$1 a.DO COMPUTER 90FTMAR6/HAROMgRE 125D5B COMP USEgVL fl a.DO Z COMPUTER 86RVICB9 Cy 125060 CONSOLE 4M PARTS LEC / DIV 6280.0E ELECTRIC PARTS b 125061 CONTINENTAL ELECTRICAL DIST 65.118.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 125062 CONTINENTAL CAIRHEMICAL TOOLS INC $3.232.50 TOOLS 125063 CONTINENTAL CONSULTANTS CO 6l.232.5V CHLORINE NG ERVICE f71 125064 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C .557.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES 3 125065 COOPER IkDUSTWHOLESALES INC fJ$929.13 ELECTRIC P PARTS OD 125065 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $259.1] ELECTRIC PARTS OD 12506E STA TC OF CALIFORNIA .141.55 ENGINEERING FEE SE -SERVICES PI-38- 125067 DANES L MTIRE f8$124.32 TIREMEeRING SERVICES PI-18-3 I 12506E DANIELS LIRE SERVICE 5121.6E TIRES b 125070 MSk/DUELER 5931.6E GAUGE r 125071 DE GUELLE t SONS 6lAYS CO .944.85 CLASS f- 125071 DELL COMPUTER E CORP f15$199.03 COMPUTER PARTS 125073 DEW PAR SALES t SERYI'CE f199.U3 BLBCTRIC PARTS 17 125014 DIALOG NFO/OR CS CO f1 d30.00 VALVES N 115075 DIALOG ENVIROATIONNMENTAL {CR01CC{ $35751.92 ANIONIC POLYMER 125076 DIATEC CMYIRONMCNTAL t1$247.29 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-12-92 .� 12507E DIGILIPPO UIEOCIATES 5297.29 PRINTING f") MOTE DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP f399.0V SERVICE AGREEMENT 16507E DOpg00 LRTL RPRISL{ INC 429.00.YO PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 R6PAIP9 y 125079 DURO-SLMSE CORP $924.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS 125060 EPE TECHROLOGIES 6250.JU INSTRUMENT PARTS 125081 EASTMAN INC 67.977.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 125082 ELECTRD,TF.ST INC $366.46 BLBCTRIC PARTS 125083 ENCHANTER INC $4,480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 125084 FOR COPIER PRODUCTS 6164.0 OFFICE SUPPLIES 125085 PST SAND AND GRAVEL INC $236.12 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 125OB6 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5.98U.0O RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 125007 JOHN 8 FALKENSTEIN PE $3.400.04 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16 12508E FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 6178.Ou AIR FREIGHT 125009 FERRELLGAS t76.55 PROPANE 125090 FILTER SUPPLY CO 4 f953.43 PUMP PARTS 125091 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURA 5350.0U PUBLICATION 125092 FISCHER t PONTLR CO 52.176.69 CHLORINATION PARTS 125093 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $948.65 LAB BUPPLI89 125094 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $219.82 LAB SUPPLIES 125095 FLO-SYSTEMS 61,394.81 PUMP PARTS b D I W FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST YO PM ING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/4l/92 PAGE 3 - REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COON 7Y CLAIMS PAID 11/67/92 POSTING DATE 1,101/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 125096 FLOOPAMICS INC $180.52 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 125097 FORMA SCIENTIFIC. INC. $3.496.86 INSTRUMENT 125098 CLIFFORD A FORKCRT $21.307.03 SURVEYING SERVICES H.O.6-30-92 I25099 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMARA slal.ee FILM 125100 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY S31bUb.54 WATER USE D 125101 FOUNTAIN VALLEY FAINT $234.64 PAINT SUPPLIES 1251L2 FOX ENTERPRISES 33.650.Uu SAFETY CONSULTANT m 125103 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES 578.54 FITTINGS m 125104 THE FOXBORO CO 9872.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES l7 1251CS DST. INC. s706.u4 OFFICE SUPPLIES D 125106 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO $3.951.69 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL 12510 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 51.973.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES --1 125106 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $3.650.37 TELEPHONE SERVICES m 125104 6ILRLICh-MITCHELL INC 93.659.84 MECHANICAL PARTS 125110 GRAHAM L JAMES $843.25 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.B-14-91 4k 125111 YY GRAINGER INC 6333.14 ELECTRIC PARTS 00 125112 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $2,292.32 PHOTO SUPPLIES 125113 DUN GREEK L ASSOCIATES s16.472.au SURVEY SERVICES M.O.6-20-92 125114 HACM COWFANY 51.696.0 LAB SUPPLIES D 125115 MATCH L KIRK INC $719.37 INSTRUMENT PARTS T— 125116 PL HAYN CO INC $136.69 FILTER C— 125117 HELPMATES TEMPORARY SERVICES 51.377.2a TEMPORARY SERVICES ty 125118 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC $1,416.23 COMPRESSOR PARTS 125119 J.T. HORVATH L ASSOC. 33.a00.O0 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 3-23-1, J-17 !n 125120 PS HUGHES CO INC $1.376.82 PAINT SUPPLIES 125121 HUNTER CORPORATION $108.260.7a CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 225122 HUNTIN610K BEACH RUBBER SIX 9352.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES n 125123 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C $150.74 BICYCLE PARTS 125124 IBM COPP/PC BOOKS 6 SPECIA 1,587.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES Cn 125125 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $25.78J.51 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-14-90 125126 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $896.25 CONNECTORS 125127 INFOTRIEVE 625.5a PUBLICATION 125128 INGRAM PAPER $191.19 PAPER 125129 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $135.47 TRUCE PARTS 125130 INTEGRATED BUSINESS INT9 INC 554.547.46 OFFICE FURNITURE N.O.4-8-92 125131 J G GLASS CORPORATION $1.361.53 REFUND PLAN CHECK BALANCE 125132 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP S1.b35.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 125133 JAYS CATERING $275.91 DIRECTORS' MEETING EKPRNSES 125134 JCNSEN INSTRUMENTS CO $1.029.26 GAUGE 125135 JM JOHNSOR GENERAL CONTR 51.950.06 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-17 125136 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY s139.13 ELECTRIC PARTS 125137 JONES CHEMICALS INC 35.968.07 CHEMICALS 125136 JONES INDUSTRIAL HANDWARL C 3605.54 HARDWARE 125139 KALLEENOS COMPUTER PRODUCTS $119.66 PUBLICATION 125140 KEENAN L ASSOCIATES 52.475.u4 SAFETY SUPPLIES 125141 KELLY SEFVICES s89.16 TEMPORARY SERVICES D n r o FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORNINU CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE la/v1192 PAGE 9 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 11A7192 POSTING DATE IU/U7/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 125142 KING BEARING INC S1.54e.0 MACHINE SUPPLIES 125153 KNOA INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 69.J15.29 PIPING 125144 MARTIN KOROICK SR 53.194.BU CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 125145 LA LIOUIG MANGLING SYSTEMS 5102.E PUMP PARTS 125146 LAB SAFETY SUFPLY CO S98.38 LAB SUPPLIES 125147 LANTRONIR 5161.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1251AC LEGI -TECH 5275.0b COMPUTER SERVICES m 125349 LIESERT CORPORATION S4'.80.53 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS ME 225150 KP LINDSTROM INC 51.205.0 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL n 125151 ARTHUR D LITTLE, INC 554.18 PUBLICATION 125152 LOCAL AGENCY 14.V00.Ob LAFCO PROCESSING FEE 125153 SOTS LVNCh CORP S128.58 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES m125154 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $933.33 OCEAN MONITORING 3 125155 MDT BIOLCGIC COMPANY $245.76 SERVICE AGREEMENT 125156 MPS $338.6. PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 3B 125157 MACOMCO 5133.78 SERVICE AGREEMENT CO 125158 MA6NETEK NATIONAL ELECTRIC 31.325.23 PUMP PARTS i 125159 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 531.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 125160 MATT CHLOR INC S2.UOB.l. CHLORINATION PARTS 125161 MCKINLEY EQUIFMENT CORP 176.37 TRUCK PARTS F— 125162 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO $50.99 INSTRUMRNT SUPPLIES r 125163 MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER 511.661.JU WATER CONSERVATION PROJECT ty 125164 MICROAGE OF CERRITOS 9108.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE 125165 MIDWAY MFG A MACHINING 514.674.13 IMPELLER 125166 MILLTRONICS S3.U69.78 INSTRUMENT PARTS 125167 MISCO $46/.56 TAPES 125168 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO $107.WU ELECTRIC PARTS (� 125169 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO 3630.UO PUBLICATION 125170 JAMES M MONT60MERY 911.421.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES N 125171 MONTGOMERY LABORAIURILS 11.b05.J0 LAB SERVICES 125172 MOTION IRDUSTRIES INC 112.35 MECHANICAL PARTS 125173 MULLEN L ASSOC INC 33,297.54 ENGINEERING SERVICES 125174 BASCO WEST INC $249.21 LAB SUPPLIES 125175 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTAL 125176 NCWARN ELECTRONICS $598.57 ELECTRIC PARTS 125177 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $5.94 WATER USE 125178 NORTHWESTERN CARBON $4.278.88 CHEMICALS 125179 NUTECH CORPORATION $21,694.63 1." EQUIPMENT 125100 OFFICE ELECTRONICS. INC. 5217.29 PAPER 125182 01 CORPORATION 186.25 LAB SUPPLIES 125182 OFFICE PFVILION/INTERIOR RES 299.35 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS 125283 CA SYSTEPS CO 538.183.U6 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91 125184 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $82.b7 TRUCK PARTS 125185 ORANGE COURIER SIIA.JU COURIER SERVICES 125IB6 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. 51.335.67 FITTINGS - 125187 ORION RESEARCH $291.0. INSTRUMENT r U: FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/01192 FADE 5 REPORT NUMBER AF63 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COU U TV CLAIMS PAID 1L107/92 POSTING DATE l0107/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OESCRIPTION 12518E OXYGEN SERVICE $5.417.77 SPECIALTY GASES 125309 COUNTY OF ORANGE 569.176.00 USSR FEE DATA H.O.11-11-91 125190 CSOOC SELF FUNDED MEDICAL 1 3100.000.00 MEDICAL PREMIUM ADVANCE 125191 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $2.103.14 SAFETY SUPPLIES 125192 PACIFIC BELL 6226.86 TELEPHONE SERVICES 125193 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS f6.89b.J0 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS a 125194 PAK WEST S2.106.5. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES m 125195 PALMIERI. TYLER, WIENER. 51.536.40 LEGAL SERVICES 19-1-1A m 125196 PARAGON CABLE 534.95 CABLE SERVICES Z C 125197 PARAMOUNT TANK INC $434.37 TANK TESTING a 12519E PICKWI ELM ER CORPORATION 31.927.95 LAB 9UPPLIEB 125200 PIMAYISR PAPER S113.51 PACKING MATERIALS m 125201 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS INC f217.592.23 RESIDUALS REMOVAL N.0.5-8-91 m 125202 PITIES SOOES 3333.87 POSTAGE R MACHINE LEADS 3 125293 PLAINS TRUESALOE HARDWARE 331.C7 RENTAL � 125203 POLYMETEIG E. INC. .252.33 CANTON EQUIPMENT W 12520S POSITIVE INC $22$241.70 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.1-11-92 125206 HAROLD POSITIVE FORMULATORS, INC. 1252.60 CHEMICALS 1 12520E NRROLD PRIMROSE ICE a225.60 ICE a 125206 TRUF PROJECT SOLUTREETIONS CARE $2.225.00 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES P r 12520E THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS G0. 49 S150.90 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 r 125209 p t S AUTOMATION CROW a150.93 ELECTRIC PARTS 125211 CAVALCADE ELECTRIC ESCROW TORS f999292.50 ELECTRIC M ORNAGBMENT SYSTEM M.0.8-12-92 Nl7 125212 RPM ELECTRIC M. f9.377.13 INSTRUME MOTOR REPAIRS 125213 RACO MFG. t HOES COCU 576.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS .� 125213 RED WING EXP SHOES $576.6E COURIER CAS BHO88 � 125215 RCDI EXPRESS 005.11 COURIER SERVICES 125216 MCJUNKIN-REPUSLICBLIC SUPPLY 1L002.88 HARDWARE 12521E REMOLD INC. f112.89 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES N 125210 ROMAN ENGINEERING CO /11284.36 ELECTRIC PART 12521E JOSENIUM PRODUCTS Co $755.37 ELECTRIC BUPPLI88 125220 GAIETY T NYECORP f SON IN $173.31 STEEL TS 125221 SAFELY KLEIN COUP $521.73 PARTS CLEANER 125222 SANDERS ENGINEERING 3521.73 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 125223 SANCON ENGINEERING INC i1R$980.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 888VIC88 125223 SANTA PC INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 3985.69 PLUMBING 9UPPLIEB 125229 DEUG SARYI$ 5675.0 FIRST AID/CPR TRAINING 12522 SETYVES f1.124.0u LAB RIRVICEB 125226 SECURITY SPECIALISTS $313.01 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 125228 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 3662.52 TOOLS HARDWARE 12522E SIGMILD CN SALES i$78.11 TOOLS 125230 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO •70.11 LAB 9UPPLIEB 125231 SKALCR. INC f$1.311.50 LRB 9UPPLIEB 125232 SKIPRBK YRLX-IN MEDICAL CLI 31.311.50 - PRE-EMPLOYMENT H PHYSICAL EXAMS 125233 SOUTHEEMERY CO f981.09 802E TESTING M.O.7-17-91 125231 SOUTHERN CALIF CDI SON CO fl.:B 9.99 POWER a ri m FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST WCRXINb CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE !4/el/92 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTT CLAIMS PAID 10/07/92 POSTING DATE 10147/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 125234 SO CAL GAS CO $5.640.35 NATURAL GAB 125235 SOUThLRN COUNTIES OIL CO $26.948.46 DIESEL/UNLEADSO FUEL 125236 SOUVENIR FHOTO 4103.3b PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 125237 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC 5624.08 VALVE PARTS 125238 SPEX INOLSTRIES INC $517.18 LAB SUPPLIES 12-239 - SPRINGER-VERLAG 3109.1b PUBLICATIONS a 128240 SRCCO PLEAIBLE 173.46 TRUCK PARTS 125241 STARNA CELLS. INC. $414.77 LAB SUPPLIES m 125242 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS 1780.6. LAB EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION O 125243 STERLING ART 9175.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES n 125244 SUMMIT STEEL $1,308.57 STEEL 125245 SUPELCO INC $152.72 LAB SUPPLIES 125246 70 SCIENTIFIC GLASS $94.49 LAB SUPPLIES 125247 TIF INSTRUMENTS INC $71.75 ELECTRIC PARTS m 125248 TEKDRAULICS $1.871.25 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 125249 TELFCELL, INC 564.26 OPERATING SUPPLIES 4h 125250 CHARLES E THOMAS $356.22 TRUCK PARTS 00 125251 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1571.69 HARDWARE 125252 TONY•S LOCK 1 SAFE SERVICE 573.47 LOCK RE-KEYING 125253 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO 54.172.37 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING W.O.11-13-91 y 125254 VESTRONICS $1,154.22 INSTRUMENT PARTS T— 125255 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY JUL $667.14 TRUCK PARTS r 125256 JG TUCKER L SON INC 43,987.86 INSTRUMENT PARTS ey 125257 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $5.665.56 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 12525E UNITED CONCRETE COMPANIES 5561.U5 CONCRETE CN 125259 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $345.64 PARCEL SERVICES 125260 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP 6250.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT A 125261 'MARK D SOOSEY $14.696.75 WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE H.0.3-I1-92 I7 125262 YVR SCIENTIFIC $2,700.74 LAB SUPPLIES —i 125263 VALIN CORPORATION - 5711.59 REGULATOR PARTS Ln 125264 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO S1..J3.25 PLUMBING SUPPLIED 125265 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 52.695.50 LAB SUPPLIES 125266 VERNE'S PLUMBING $110.00 PLUMBING SERVICES 125267 VILLAGE NURSERIES $294.67 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 125268 VEATHER AKD VINO INSTRUMENT $290.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES 125269 VEST COAST INSTRUMENTS 5173.1V INSTRUMENT PARTS 125270 WESCL $217.61 ELECTRIC PARTS 125271 VHESSOE VAREC 98.352.78 VALVE 125272 WHITNEY PACHINERY INC S15.a87.77 TRUCK PARTS 125273 U17EG SCIENTIFIC $905.10 LAB SUPPLIES 125274 WORDPERFECT CORP - $156.06 SUBSCRIPTION 125275 XEROX CUPP 41.594.7. COPIER LEASES 125276 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $155.5. VALVE TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/07/92 S2.03.808.O8 b I V FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/01/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/07/92 POSTING DATE 10/07/92 SUMMARY AMOUNT #1 OPER FUND $4,723.35 01 CAP FAC FUND $680.00 b p2 OPEN FUND $10,829.38 m 02 CAP FAC FUND 09,443.79 'm p3 OPEN FUND - 939,355.06 az p5 OPEN FUND $21,385.32 p5 CAP FAC FUND $7,078.73 46 OPEN FUND $3,324.32 p7 OPEN FUND $0,363.76 m 07 CAP FAC FUND $1,188.00 3 #11 OPEN FWD $5,201.71 p11 CAP FAC FUND - $3,297.30 Y13 OPER FUND $879.20 00 014 OPEN FUND $4,250.00 I #14 CAP FAC FUND $4,716.49 , p667 OPEN FUND $3,316.51 a p7614 OPER FUND 5115.47 r JT OPEN FUND $509,266.57 r- CORP $1,197,121.28 d SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $103,320.25 JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 4127,164.09 -------------- 62,073,80E 78 .............. N ri tI FUND NO 9159 - JT DIST 6EAKIN4 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1./14/92 PAGE 1 REPORT LUUNIT SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNII NUMtlEX AFa! CLAIMS PAID 1./21192 POSTING DATE 16121/92 WARRANT NO. VLNDUR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1253:1 AG TLLH COMPANY 31L9.035..1 'RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.O.30-9-91 1253L2 ACTION RENTALS $385.54 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1253.3 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES 39T3.71 LAB SUPPLIES 1253.4 AIR Fh CbLCTS 6 CHEMICAL IN 60V.315.UU 06M AGREEMENT 0X9 OBN SYBT M.0.8-9-59 125J(S ALUPICM CHEMICAL CO stl 3.65 LAB SUPPLIES 1253(6 ALHNheRA FOUNUNY CO LTD 64.N57..9 MAIUOLE COVERS y 1253J7 ALLIED SUPPLY CO $3,112.16 VALVE Cil 1253)6 AMERICAN FISMENIL5 SUCILIT 632.vu PUBLICATION Z 1253,9 ROSCO INC a/OR AMERICAN SEALS $5.811.91 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 125310 AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLLCTN 39J.6u PUBLICATION y 125311 AMLRICAH WATER WORKS ASSOC. 31.722.44 LAB SUPPLIES 125312 BLARE P ANDERSON 697.5b REIMBURSEMBNT - CELLULAR TELEPHONE 125313 ANIATEN - DISTRIBUTION 3934.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES FY1 125319 ANTHONY-5 HCCh a HAChINL. INC. 6766.41 MACHINE RBPAIRB/PARTS 3 125315 ABC LABORATORILS 61.732.50 SERVICE AGRBBMENT •125316 AWDA7IL TLSIINU LABORATORY S10UO.04 LAB SERVIC88 125317 ARMUR VAC SWLLFING SEPVICL 1724.4J STREET SWEEPING SERVICES 00 12531E ASSUCIAIEL SOILS kNbIbELNIN6 39.313.5. SOIL TBSTING 125319 BNR LANDFILL •3.021.32 ,RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 125326 bRW SAFETY E SIMPLY 61.18O.b9 SAFETY SUPPLIES 3a 125321 BANANA WLULPRINT 32.976.65 ELUSPRINTINO SERVIC68 r 125322 BANCLAIS LAW PU6LIShEAS 1211.0 SUBSCRIPTION r 125323 PAITERY SPECIALTIES 1636.1. RATTERIBS t7 125324 6AXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC $8,865..b LAB SUPPLIES N 125325 WT UILLAPU INC $522.49 MECHANICAL RBPAIRB 125326 bOLSA RADIATOR SLNVICE a624.96 RADIATOR REPAIRS 125327 hON A-RUES 3222.33 TRUCK PARTS 125328 TMi BOND NUVLM 164.99 PUBLICATION 125329 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $1.406.39 MOTOR 125330 STLVE BLUALO CONSTRUCTION LU l82..8 W.4r CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3. 2-28, 2-29 125331 UUUGET JANITORIAL Sllb50.00 JANITORIAL SERVICBS 125332 RUILOLP•S EMPORIUM Sk J.75 HARDWARE 125333 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFF $2.010.62 PUBLICATION 12533E GARY 6 STRLED 16I11b.71 PSTTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 125335 hUTLLN PAPER Cb RPANV 31.189.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12533b CLFA 37S.UO LAB SUPPLIES 125337 CH2M PILL 19.372.28 BROINBBRINO SERVICES 125338 CAL bLA55 FOR RLSLARCH INC. 3349.97 LAB SUPPLIES 125339 CALIXOL INC 11.467.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS 125340 CAL hLST EhTLRFMISLS 61b.479.73 BOUND ABSORPTION PANELS PI-34-2 125341 CAPITOL LNDUINY. INC. 327.2E OFPICB SUPPLIES 12b342 CENTURY SAFETT INSI a SUFF 11.932.2h SAFETY SUPPLIES 12b343 uICN CLPLN VIC 3611.99 TRUCK PARTS 125344 CHLMICAL LX4I1,ELNINb 353.9r PUBLICATION I25345 CHLVNON USA INC $5.048.7. OIL 6 INTENDS 125346 CINCULITIN6 AIR 312U.Uu AIR CONDITIONER PARTS rA 1 N FUND NO 9199 JT OIS1 VCKKIN6 CAPITAL PNOCLSSINO LATE Au/l V/92 PAGE 2 R LPJRT NUMBLR AP46 CJUNIT SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COON TT CLAIMS PAID lu12L/92 POSTING DAIS 16,21/9, SARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 125347 CLAMK CGKSULTAOTS 61.b80.uJ CONSULTING SERVICES 125346 COASTAL CHLORINATION s2.88U..: WATER SYSTEM CHLORINATION SERVICES 12b389 THE CJ89 GROUP a89.... PUBLICATION 12535b CULICh AND SGNS $747.3.7... CONSTRUCTION I-9 125351 COMPRLSSbR COMPONENTS OF CA ab.6A1.39 PUMP PARTS 125352 COMPUSA, l..C. sA.kas.3b COMPUTER SERVICES y 125353 CONFUSLI,VE a1V d2 COMPUTER SERVICES m 125354 CONANU*S PHOTUGRAPHT S1b9.38 PHOTO SERVICES m 125355 CONNELL OR PARTS / DIV $139.52 TRUCK PARTS Z 125356 COASOLIUATLD ELECTRICAL LIST 61..172.45 ELECTRICAL PARTS y 125357 CONSGLIDATEG .LASTICS EU 582.6J LAB SUPPLIES 12535E CGNIIAEHT.L AIR IUCLS 1,.0 +d.146.dJ TOOLS 125359 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 63.232.5i CHLORINE H.0.9-9-91 m 12536G CONTINLb ML GFAPhICS S1u5.38 BLUBPRINTING g 125361 CONTNACIUN•S BOOK STONE al.447.6. PUBLICATION 125362 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS U L 6+3.123.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1-9 125363 COOPLB IADUSTAIES INC aT.b92.17 COMPUTER PARTS m 125364 COSTA MESA AUTO SUFPLY +998.93 TRUCK PARTS . 125365 CJUNIV YHOLLSALE ELECTRIC 69..5 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 125366 CYNLCLA s2.2b Y.0Y SERVICE AGREEMENT n 125367 CAL IDLY MELLOGG UNIT a5.uuu.JJ LAB SERVICES F— 12536E STATE OF CALIFORNIA a9.231..0 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE T— 125369 SIATL OF CALIFORNIA S23U.43 DIESEL USE TAR ly 125370 STATE b4ARU Of LQUILIZATION 1473.33 UNDERGROUND PUEL STORAGE TAX 125371 OE ANEA CORFORATIUN s15u.Ju RENTAL EQUIPMENT � 125372 HSK/OECKEN $212.11 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES A 125373 OIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 11.714.52 CHEMICALS 125375 DUNN WAIERPR ISES INC > 556G.Ub PLANT NAINTBES 8 REPAIRS --A 125375 DUNN tUYARO6 SAFETY a560.97 PAINT SUPPLIES ti 12537E LU FGNT CO SAi CIY SERVICES aL l53.S9 LAB SUPPLIER 125370 LIE M INSTFLM CNTS V f96.31 IREIGHT T SUPPLIES 125379 EAM CG/Nb5 SU FP LT a9.31 FREIGHT 125380 EA6TMAR INC 62.966.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 125380 EALHRK/tR INC a5.u9G..Y OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 125382 FALCON a2.l8...0 REmcosl SIDUAL 125383 FALCON DISPOSAL SEPVIEt i5.98u../ MINSTRUCT REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 1- 125383 FASTENING U 1'SOLUTIONS PE a3$212.67 CONSTRUCTION eBRVICee I-9. 1-16 125365 FCOLRAING SOLUTIONS INC a212... OFFICE FREIGHT SUPPLIES 125385 FEDERAL EXPRESS CU xI $79b sV AIR ANEIGXT 12538E FILTLHLINE 525.89 PROPANE 125388 FILTEMLINE CORP s52U.N9 CHLORINATION PARTS 125389 FILTER 3Af PLY GU a969.61 PUMP PARTS 125399 FISHER A SFOkILRCIENTIFIC EO a6..59.6u CHLORINATION PARTS 125391 FISHER SCILNIIFI[ co $5.259.49 LAB SUPPLIES 125391 FLU SYSTEMS V a5.259.A9 PIMP PARTS ' 125392 FDD11 TAli. VALLEY [ANLNp a82.11+ PILM C!J I N IN FUND NO 9194 JT U1ST 6CMb ING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 16/1R/92 PAGL 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CUUNIT SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS kAID 16/21/92 POSTING DATE 16021/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 125393 FOUNIA14 VALLEY TAINT $209.14 PAINT SUPPLIES 125394 1OA INb UbIRIAL SALES $317.47 FITTINGS 125395 lhC FJABLRU CU 62P632.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 125396 CITY OF FULLLRTDk SI%I.93 WATER USE 125397 GA1I.AFL LUMNER CO s2.W51.97 BUILDING MATERIALS 12539E GANNAIT CALLAIIAN CUMFANY 63.33J.56 OPERATING SUPPLIES 125395 GENEk AL BIN01NG CUNF 617b.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES Y 1254G0 6iNLRAL cLECTRIC SUFFLV CO. 6196.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES n' 1254:1 GENERAL ILLLPhONE CU $4.771.19 TELEPHONE SERVICES rn 125902 GEORGE LEECH A ASSOCIATES 6223.72 DRUIDS C 125A0 GIERLICh•NITCMELL INC 517.252.64 MECHANICAL PARTS n 1254(4 DON GREEN A ASSOCIATES 113,191... SURVEYING SERVICES H.O.6-10-92 1254:b GERALU L GREER CO INC 9231.66 TRUCK PARTS 12L4G6 hSW TECnNGLJGY 6771.761.7. CONSTRUCTION P2-49 FEI t25967 PATCH A KIRK INC f2t4.06 ENGINE PARTS 3 12546B HOERbIGLR CVS CALIF INC 9423.63 COMPUTER PARTS 12b90 HORIZON NIGH REACH A EWUIP s101.85 TRUCK PARTS OO 125416 J.T. HORVATH 6 ASSOC. s3.a00.uu CONSTRUCTION SBRVICSS J-23-1, J-17 125411 RS hUGhLS CU INC 1%9.68 HARDWARE I 12b912 CITY OF HUNTINGTON bCACh 121.7b WATER USE D 125413 HUNTINGTON HONbA 61••91.V2 LAS SUPPLIES r 12b911 hYCLONE LABORATORIES INC $3.318.76 LAR SUPPLIES f— 125415 IRD MEChANALVSIS 63.W23.30 TOOLS l7 125416 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL 659.59b.ua FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-14-90 125417 INDUSTRIAL. TM.LADEO PRODUCTS $173.75 CONNECTORS N 125418 INDUSTRIAL LAS/L S39.Uu SUBSCRIPTION ---1 125619 INFORTLAl SYSTEMS. INC. fl H9u.Vu SERVICE AGREEMENT 125920 INSIDE L.P.A. A765.4u LAS SUPPLIES f") 125921 INIERMLC 13.936.51 LAB SUPPLIES 125422 INIEkSTAIL bnTILRV SVSILMS 1726.66 BATTERIES Cl 125423 IRVINE OCSk10P GRAPHICS 4118.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 123924 IRVINE RANCH .ATER UISTk ICT 592.7b WATER USE 125425 JLA CREDIT CCRP $145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 125426 GAEA1 WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 32.J21.87 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 125427 JM JOHNSON GENERAL CONTN 32.500.GU DOOR RELOCATIONS 12542B JGHNSIW.E SUFPLV f1.261.2b ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 125429 JGNLS CHEMICALS IWC 62.031.53 CHSMICIILS 125430 JONES INCUSIAIAL HARDWARE C 6166.G1 HARDWARE 125431 RAN PRODUCTS 4992.17 TOOLS 125432 RLLLV SERVICES $312.38 TEMPORARY SERVICES 125433 KING WLAAING INC 5290.5b MACHINE SUPPLIES 12543/ KNGA ITULbIRIAL SU6ILILS s795.79 LAB SUPPLIES 125435 MAPIl1, NChUICk SH f1.97U.BU CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 125436 LA CELLULAR 1LLLFHUNE CU 6136.49 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 125437 LIMITDROUE CORP 62.898.9e ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 12543E LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS. CU. /\` $1.6.82 DEFERRED COMP TRANSFER F S FUND NO 9199 JI LIST >LSK IN4 CAI IIPL PROCLSSINb DATE 10/14/92 VA4[ 4 RLFORT SUNKEN APi3 COUNTY CLAI SANITATION UISIR ICOS Of ORANGE 6121/9 CLAIMS FAIO 14/21/92 POSTING DATE 14/21/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OLSCNLPllON 125439 RP LINLSIRUM INC 63.42A.0, CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 121444 RCL LANORATORIIO $4.965.04 LAB SERVICES. 125441 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY 4243.2b LAB SUPPLIES 125442 MPS 561.2. PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 12b443 MACOMCO 452W.bb SERVICE AGREEMENT 12b444 MAO SYSILKS 513..31 INSTRUMENT PARTS n 12b445 MAINTLGANCE PRODUCTS INC S3.966.2b MECHANICAL SUPPLIES m' 12544b MAMIIIL 4 VAL.L SUFPLY S2..1...3 PLUMBING SUPPLIES Z 125447 MANVAC ELECTRONICS 1111.3b INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES CO 12544b MNTf ChLOR INC 62.ebb.v4 CHLORIRRTION PARTS n 12N49 MECHANICAL CHIVES CO 4497.17 INSTRUMENT 125450 MICRO MUIION 33.414.18 INSTRUMENT 12bib1 MICRGAGL OF CERRITOS $3.6Yb.17 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 3 125452 MIO.AY MFG 4 MACMININO 51.465..0 NECRANICAL PARTS 12b453 MILLTRUNICS 52.204.41 INSTRUMENT PARTS 4k 125454 MINNES.IA WLSTEAh VISUAL THIS. $144.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00 125455 ALAULN DLKTICM CONSTRUCTION 65u2.bUb.9. CONSTRUCTION 2-30 12b45b NON160MLRV LAbORAIURILS >S15.Vi LAB SERVICES 12S457 MOTION IAGUSTPIES INC Y1b3.34 HARDWARE a 12b456 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 569.JS SAFETY FILM RENTALS r 125459 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS $116.53 PRINTING r 12b460 NEWARK LLECTRbb1CS 51bb.45 ELECTRIC PARTS d 12L461 NORES IRICUCTS 61.006.15 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1254621 OM SVSICMS C. Fit.A70.91 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 Cn 125463 OPERATION TCENNOLOGT INC S1.185.25 SERVICE AGREEMENT --i 125464 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO IAFTS C 5154.16 TRUCK PARTS 125465 ORANGE COUNTY LhCMICAL LO 4743.74 CHEMICALS c") 125466 ORANGE VALVE 4 FITTING CO. 419.743.18 FITTINGS 12546T OSCAR'S LOCK A SAFE 523U.64 SECURITY SUPPLIES Cn 12'-466 UAYLEN SERVICI $1.415.33 SPECIALTY GASES 125469 COUNTY SANITATION 015THICT 343.240.21 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 125470 FACCO.SALES 60l.82 PAINT SUPPLIES 125471 PACIFIC FARTS 52.632.66 INSTRUMENT PARTS 125472 PACIFIC SAFLIV LGUIPMLNI CO 42.622.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES 12-473 PACIFIC ECLL 115..E TELEPHONE SBRVICSS 125474 FALTLL MERIDIAN SVSIEMS S97..b9 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 125475 FAGCRLI Y1b2..L PAGER RENTALS 12E47b FARAGDN CABLE $66.78 CABLE SERVICES 125477 FLAT MAR2ICK MAIN 4 CO 516.060.Uu AUDITING SERVICES M.0.3-13-91 12547P FEF.AMGN IhE55 PIC FRI.u. PUBLICATION 125479 FICKVICK FAFEW 5346.1. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 12548E PIMA 696 SVSIEKS INL S115.121.S6 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 1254MI PITHi.Y bC>ES 526b.:b POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 125462 SCOTT FOLK 52.144.0 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL 125483 FULYMLTRICS. INL, S32b..: EQUIPMENT RENTAL 125484 POLYFUNL INC S13.IUb.3. CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.]-11-92 Ib E11 FUND NO 9159 JT UIST LCFM INI CPF IIAL PROCESSING DAZE /0/14/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CbUhT. SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAN6L COUNIV CLAIM$ PAID 1U/21/92 POSTING DATE 1Y/21/92 WARRANT HU. VERDUN AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 125485 F06EN ELECTED SUFPLV EU S97.2u ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 12548E PHECISICN JNLULTRILS Abu.Yu ELECTRIC PARTS 1254E7 HAROLD PRIMROSE 1CL S/96... ICE 12548E PRLFLSSICKAL SERVICE IND. SL99.uU SOIL TESTING 125489 THE PR UJECT SOLUTIONS CO. S4.966..0 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECIIOM M.0.7-17-91 125490 UUESTRON CONY S1.2G4..0 LAB SUPPLIES n 125491 STEVE P. RADOS• INC. sabl.Gle.l. CONSTRUCTION 14-1-IA-2 125452 RAINbbk LISPOSAL CO S1.429.49 TRASH REMOVAL T77 12b493 RAININ INSTRUMENT CU $2.942.13 LAB SUPPLIES Z 125494 NECK INC $145.996.11 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 C 125495 THE REb1S7LR $3.198.3. NOTICES 6 ADS D 125496 REMOTE MUCH NLSLTTING SYS7 aO•JUU.GU POSTAGE 125497 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY aS.b6U.b. PLUMBING SUPPLIES m12549E RONAN ENGINEERING CO S1.6s..61 ELECTRIC PARTS 3 125499 THOMAS L. ROOD S2•.OU.CJ DEFERRED CGMP EMERGENCY WITHDRAWAL 12b5IC ROSEMOUNT s592.1b INSTRUMENT PARTS 4L 125561 JOSEFH T MTLNSON L SON IN Sb45.64 METAL 00 125512 SAIL7Y ALLEN CORP sob.?. SAFETY SUPPLIES 1 1255C3 SANTA FL INDUSTRIAL PLASTIES s2.520.u6 PLI ING SUPPLIES 1255L4 DUUG SARVIS 337b.u4 FIRST AID/CPR TRAINING a 1255F5 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L $137.705.79 OCRAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92 r 125b C6 SEA EIML ELECTRONICS INC s1.396.aU LAB SUPPLIES 12550 SHAMkOCR SUPPLE 42.472.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS Ip 12bbL8 SHASIA ELECTRIC sab.398.Y. ELECTRICAL SERVICES J-27 12b51.9 ShUALLUCK SALLS ab.226.15 HARDWARE � . 12b511 SMITH EMERY C. - 42.562.UY SOIL TESTING M.0.6-10-92 A 125511 SO COAST AIR QUALITY 6I6.UU PERMIT FEES 125512 SUCTH COAST bATLR s95.., WATER USE Cl 125513 SOUTFLRN CALIF EDISON LO S73s122.1b POWER 125514 SO CAL GAS CU 39.153.16 NATURAL GAS N 125b15 UESTALLUV INC .817.82 MELDING SUPPLIES 12bb16 SPLL INDUSTRIES INC $597.64 LAB SUPPLIES 125517 SACCO FLEXIBLE $2.125.79 TRUCK PARTS 125516 JAMES STANFILL CUNSTkUg10h S2.406.Yu CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 125519 STATE STRLLT BANN sll•UTS.ub MP TRUSTEE SERVICES 125526 STATLRIVE INSTALLERS _ s116R.JJ LAB SUPPLIES 125b21 SUNSET FCRO 495.55 TRUCK PARTS 12552E SUPELCO INC 464.71 CONNECTORS 12b523 SUFLF THEM CVRP S2.U23.11 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 125594 SUPER FU6Lh FFODUCTS S155.1b JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 125525 TERURAULIIS .118.0 MECHANICAL PARTS 12S526 TEHRAN COMPANY f9.71 G..J LAB SUPPLIRS 125527 THCMFSON INDUSTPIAL SUPPLY 41.155.u1 HARDWARE 125526 TOUY•S LUCK L SAFE SLRVICL 4816.11 LOCKSMITH SERVICES 12b529 TOVI.L CREATIVE SERVICES 5552.b1 PRINTING 12553E TUVO LAND5CAF[NG CU S4.172.37 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.11-13-91 W Lz FUND NO 9199 Jl DIST bCRRIN4 CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE lu/14/92 FALL L RLPONT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SAh IIATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COU BY CLAIMS PAID 1L/21/92 POSTING DATE 14/21/92 RAMPANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 12S531 TRUCK L AUTO SUFFLY INC 4182.19 TRUCK PARTS 125532 JG TUCAER 6 SON INC /6.85W.29 INSTRUMENT PARTS 125533 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 6.66.5. LAS SUPPLIES 12b535 US ALTO GLASS IENTLRS b133.71 TRUCK PARTS 125535 UNUERGROURU SERVICE ALERT $218.4. CONTRACT SERVICES 125536 VNITLO NCTTINGHAM 51.163..1 RENTAL RQUIPMRNT a 125537 UNITIO FARCLL SLRVICE SA45.64 PARCEL SERVICES Gl 12b538 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP »L7... SERVICE AGREEMENT m 125539 SUPEh INIlNOENT OF DOCUMENTS bSV O.G. SUBSCRIPTION aZ 125540 VbR SCILNIIFIL $7.767.91 LAB SUPPLIES 12bS61 VALLEY GIRLS SUPFLI CO $788.9V PLUMBING SUPPLIE6 12b542 VLRNE'S PLUMBING b145... PLUMBING SERVICES 12bb43 VENTER SYSTEMS S077.5. COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT m 12b544 WASOINGTOh VISTA INT. hU7LL Sb50.u. TRAINING REGISTRATION 3 125645 WEAThLh AND WIND INSTRUMENT Si91.36 SAFETY SUPPLIES # 125546 WESTERN HI&M4AY FRUDUCTS IN S3Tb.G5 TRUCK PARTS W I25547 WESTLRN STATES ChEMICAI SUPFLI 482,961.23 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-0-90 I2S546 LLSTIN ENGINEERING S1.527.39 ENGINEERING SSRVICSS 1 125549 ROURKE . WOODRUFF S ON S1b6A61.65 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 a 12b55G WJRUYENF ELT CU6F 139..J COMPUTER SOFTWARE f— 125551 VLNTUhA SOFTWARE INC. b161.b3 SERVICE AGREEMENT 1— 12b5S2 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $569.16 VALVE 12b553 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS $551.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS CJ 125bS4 SIEBARTH L ALPEK/C.S. ALIEN 977H68.6L CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 ... .. .. ...... ;0 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID L/21/92 S4.172 Jtl5.11 � c_v__cez--zcsecze C6 N SUMMARY ANOIMT 01 OPER FUND 02,796.1E 01 CAP PAC FUND $57,054.71 02 OPBR FUND $9,405.30 62 CAP PAC PUMD 0596,018.5E 63 OPEN FUND $42,194.99 M3 CAP PAC FUND $241.40 M5 OVER FUND $4,033.37 05 CAP PAC FUND $4,536.74 16 OPER FUND $57.31 07 OPER FUND $13,950.99 07 CAP PAC FOND $1,672.85 011 OPEN FUND $6,721.97 114 OPBR FUND $47.76 914 CAP PAC PUMO $329,706.77 6566 OPEN FUND $1,270.90 0566 CAP SAC FUND $692.50 CA 0761E OPER FUND $2,685.87 a, JT OPER FUND $1.046,625.26 CORP 61,815,355.25 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $84,269.12 JT WORKING CAPITAL $142,949.23 ------------------- CA 177 AAA.11 RESOLUTION NO. 92-155 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN BULK, P FICTI NNO. - 2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN BULK, SPECIFICATION NO. C-029, TO DX SYSTEMS COMPANY The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of contract be made to DX Systems Company for Purchase of Chlorine in Bulk, Specification No. C-029, and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposal submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That a Purchase Contract for Specification No. C-029 be awarded to DX Systems Company for the price of $229.40 per ton plus sales tax, furnished and delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor, for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terms; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign said Purchase Contract with said supplier to supply chlorine in bulk pursuant to the specifications and purchase contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said material are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992. "C-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1" ` COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS BI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA October 20, 1992 tOBaa EWfi PVENUE 11127 MEMORANDUM Pa Bo.FOR FWNTNN VP0.EY.OP4E(fPNIP 892B,BI B] 171.19624a11 To: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager Re: PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN BULK SPECIFICATION NO. C-029 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, October 13, 1992, for the purchase and delivery of Chlorine in Bulk for a one-year period, beginning December 1, 1992. Tabulation of bids is as follows: Unit Price Vendor Per Ton 1. DX Systems Company S 229.40 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 2. All Pure Chemical Co. 265.00 Santa Fe Springs, CA 3. Jones Chemical NO BID Torrance, CA 4. Imperial West Chemical Co. NO BID Antioch, CA It is recommended the award be made to OX Systems Company, the lowest responsible bidder, for a one-year contract period, starting December 1, 1992. The total estimated annual cost of 5917,600.00, plus sales tax, is based on furnishing 4,000 tons at a unit price of $229.40 per ton. Provisions are in the specifications for four consecutive one-year contract extensions. Respectf41lly submitted: Ted Hoffman~ Purchasing Manager We hereby concur wi h the above recommendation: G y G. Str Robert J. Ooten irector o 'nance _ Assistant Director of Operations IIC-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2" RESOLUTION NO. 92-156 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF FERRIC CHLORIDE, SPECIFICATION N . P-1 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF FERRIC CHLORIDE, SPECIFICATION NO. P-136, TO IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL COMPANY t t t t t t t t t k k t k k k t t t The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of contract be made to Imperial West Chemical Company for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. P-136, and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposal submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That a Purchase Contract for Specification No. P-136 be awarded to Imperial West Chemical Company for the unit price of $204.77 per dry ton plus sales tax, furnished and delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor, for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions upon mutually-agreeable terns; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign said Purchase Contract with said supplier to supply ferric chloride pursuant to the specifications and purchase contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said material are hereby rejected. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992. "D-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1" = COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS el ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA October 20, 1992 101W E.I.AVENUE MEMORANDUM PC egx 9127 FnUPRAIN VA l Y,uumeMA 92728.8127 TO. J.Wayne Syroester,General Manager ntn asz.xn FROM: Katherine Yuosh, Senior Buyer RE: PURCHASE OF FERRIC CHLORIDE SPECIFICATION NO P-136 Sealed bids were opened Tuesday. October 13. 1992 for the purchase and delivery d Femie Chlonde for a one year period beginning December 1, ifin Tabulation of bide is as followe' Vendor Cast Par Dry Ton Freight Tmel 1. Imperial West Chemical Co. 6 156AD E48.37 S 204.77 Audi CA 2. E I,du Pont de Nemours 8 Co. 257.95 none 257.95 Wilmington,DE 3. I.G.Industrial Corp. 257.00 5D.00 3D7.00 Pancho Cucamonga.CA a. Ashland Chemical 1.090.00 240.00 1,330.00 Orange,CA 5. All Pum Chemical Company NO BID Santa Fe Springs,CA 6. Commerce Chemical Company NO BID GN or Industry.CA 7. SMP/Lacroix NO BID Huntington Beads.CA S. Western States Chemical Supply Corp. NO BID Orange,CA 9. Jones Chemises.Inc. NO BID Torrance.CA it is recommended the award be made to ImOerial Wen Chemieal'Co..the lowest responsible bidder.for a one year smract period.starting December 1. 1992. The total estimated annual Cost of$1.146.712.00.plus applicable sales tax.is based on furnishing 5,60D tons.at a unit Few of S2D4.77 per dry ton. The new bid price Is higher than the existing Contact with Imperial West Chemcal Company by$44.66 per dry ton. Provisions we in the spedfcadons for up to a four one(1)you combed extensions. Respectfully�submitted: � E� �af Katherina Yaros h, Senior Buyer We hereby concur with Me forego/:�B recommendation: Ted Hof ghan, Perm ing Manager treed, Robed J.Ooten Toreson of Fmn Assume Director of Operations '-r-'2rr AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2rr COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 ' P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. N0. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: COLICH BROS. , INC. , dba DATE November 18, 1 3 COLICH AND SONS JOB:_ Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9; and Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall , Job No. A -2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (geduet) $ 212,764.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. JOB NO. 1-9 Item 1 - REMOVAL OF 48-INCH CONCRETE ARCH PIPE IN TUNNEL UNDER HAMILTON AVENUE The Contract Drawings directed the Contractor to remove the existing 48-inch interplant pipeline inside the new 120-inch pipeline tunnel from Station 145+45 to 146+70 under Hamilton Avenue, for a total length of 125 linear feet. The existing 48-inch pipe encountered was a solid, steel reinforced poured-in-place concrete arch (type A) rather than the segmented unreinforced concrete block pipe (type B) shown on Sheet O-6A of the Contract Drawings. Removal of the Type A pipe required considerable more labor and equipment in the confined area of the tunnel . This work included two parallel concrete saw cuts along the bottom of the concrete arch on both sides, jackhamnering out a circular cut inside the pipe at 8-foot intervals, cutting reinforcing steel , splitting the pipe apart from the inside with hydraulic jacks, and removal of the cut and split sections of pipe with a loader. Removal of the Type B segmented pipe would have resulted in less effort, as the unreinforced pipe would have been removed in many pieces, using only the loader. The Districts' record drawings of this pipeline, installed in 1938, indicate segmented unreinforced block pipe (type B). This information was given to the Designer for incorporation into the Contract Drawings. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #5 ) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 30,732.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS. , INC. dba DATE November 16, 1992 LICH AND SO . JOB: Inter lant Pi eline and Utilit Corridor Job No. I-9; and Replacement of Portion of tandby cean utfall , Job No. J-22- ITEM 2 - REMOVAL OF 48-INCH CONCRETE ARCH PIPE IN TUNNEL UNDER ADAMS AVENUE The Contract Drawings directed the Contractor to remove the existing 48-inch interplant pipeline inside the new 120-inch pipeline tunnel from Station 63+50 to 65+10 under Adams Avenue, for a total length of 160 linear feet. The existing 48-inch pipe encountered was a solid, steel reinforced poured-in-place concrete arch (type A) rather than the segmented unreinforced concrete block pipe (type B) shown on sheet D-6A of the Contract Drawings. Removal of the Type A pipe required considerable more labor and equipment in the confined area of the tunnel. This work included two parallel concrete saw cuts along the bottom of the concrete arch on both sides, jackhamoering out a circular cut inside the pipe at 8-foot intervals, cutting reinforcing steel , splitting the pipe apart from the inside with hydraulic jacks, and removal of the cut and split sections of pipe with a loader. Removal of the Type B segmented pipe would have resulted in less effort, as the unreinforced pipe would have been removed in many pieces. using only the loader. The Districts' record drawings of this piepline, installed in 1938, indicate segmented unreinforced block pipe (type B). This information was given to the Designer for incorporation into the Contract Drawings. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #6 ) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 30,807.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 3 - REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED MANHOLE An undisclosed concrete manhole was encountered at Station 63+70 during tunneling operations for the 120-inch pipeline under Adams Avenue. Upon investigation, the concrete manhole base and shafting was found to be integrated into the existing 48-inch interplant pipeline. Removal of this manhole was required in order to continue with construction of the tunnel and installation of the new 120-inch interplant pipeline. The Contractor was directed to remove interfering portions of the manhole base and shafting and proceed with tunneling operations. Work included in this item consisted of saw cutting the concrete base inside the tunnel , breaking up the pieces with a jackhammer and removing with a loader. Shafting was removed separately from outside of the tunnel . The Contract Drawings did not show this manhole nor require its removal . This item of work was accomplished on a time and material basis pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #4) �...✓ ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 15,267.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: COLICH BROS. , INC. dba DATE November 18, 1992 COLICH AND TO7H JOB: Interplant Pipeline and Uti lit Corridor, Job No. I-9• and Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean utfal , ob No. J-2 -2 ITEM 4 - FIBEROPTIC PULL BOX ADDITION The Contractor was directed to furnish and install three additional fiberglass pull boxes inside Tunnel No. 8 at Reclamation Plant 1. The pull boxes were necessary to allow the Contractor to pull the new f1beroptic interplant cable inside the tunnel area of Plant 1 to the new Control Center. Without the additional pull boxes, the excessive number of conduit bends and offsets in the tunnel area would have made installation of the cable an impossibility. Work associated with this item consisted of furnishing and installing two each 30-inch x 24-inch x 12-inch NEMA 4X and one each 36-inch x 48-inch x 16-inch NEMA 4X pull boxes and conduit connectors in three locations inside Tunnel No. 8. The Contract Drawings and Detailed Specifications did not specify pull boxes to be installed in the tunnel area of Reclamation Plant 1. This item of work was accomplished on a time and material basis pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #3) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,352.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days ITEM 5 - TALBERT MARSH MITIGATION The Contractor was directed to perform grading work on the talbert Channel as shown on revised Contract Drawing Nos. 2, 3, 4 and new Drawing No. 6. This work consisted of removing approximately 9500 cubic yards in the mud fiats area between Reclamation Plant 2 and Pacific Coast Highway and filling approximately 6000 cubic yards of the old Talbert Channel in the same area adjacent to the Santa Ana River. Also included in this item was an extension of the existing plant water piping system to serve future landscaping needs for the Huntington Beach Wetlands Conservancy. The work covered by this item was not included in the original contract as the Districts had not received permits from the Department of the Army, ERA, State Fish and Game and Coastal Commission at the time Contracts I-9 and J-22-2 went out to bid. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH #2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 117,205.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 7 Calendar Days "E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER �.,.� C. 0. NO. Two (2) CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS. , INC. dba DATE November 18, 192 OLI H AND SON JOB: In lant Pi eline and Utilit Corridor Job No. I-9• and Replacement of Portion of Stantlby Ocean utfall , Job No. J-22- ITEM 6 - SALES TAX ADJUSTMENT - Job No. I-9 and Job No. J-22-2 were bid based on a sales tax rate of 6.5 percent for purchased materials. Section 51, the contract proposal , allows the Contractor to submit invoices and obtain a sales tax adjustment based on the increase in sales tax rate over 6.5 percent during the life of the contract. The sales tax adjustment Included in this item is based on material invoices submitted by the Contractor from October 21, 1991 through June 12, 1992. This Item was accomplished on a time and material basis pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 12,401.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 212,764.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 7 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that seven days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be Incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date September 11, 1991 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date May 2, 1993 Time Extension this C.O. 7 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 23 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 623 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date May 25, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 21 328 600.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 12 228 1 1. 0 This Change (Add) (Dedue8) $ ,764.00 Amended Contract Price $ 1,5 9,5 5.00 "E-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Two 2 CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS. INC. dba DATE November 1 1 2 COLI H AN JOB: Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9 Board Authorization Date: November 18, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: .(Engineering managei ebnstructiodManager Da e APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO (F,ORRM: m �Z wy Y1'z0-g .l7kta� O .�'l" erector of Engineering Date eneral ounsel a e COLICH BROS., INC., dba COLICH AND SONS ACCEPTED BY: 0-19�9Z CdAtractor Date "E-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE `..� FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fifteen (1915) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE Novem Fr 18, 92 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 9,759.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes In the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - BATTERY SYSTEM CABLE ° This item is for providing twenty-four VDC control power circuits to the medium voltage switchgear. Conduit and wire are routed to provide for future installation of battery systems fuses and clips. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(1) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH No. J191-037) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,873.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:- 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - RACEWAY AND CABLE FOR CHILLER FLOW SWITCHES This item is for providing conduit and cables for chiller flow switches FSL-453 and FSL-473. The required conduit and cables were shown incorrectly routed to the TE-473 and TE-453 in the contract documents. This item includes cost for replacing conduit already installed by the Contractor. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(1) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH No. J191-057) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,180.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 3 - RACEWAY AND CABLE FOR NEUTRAL GROUNDING TRANSFORMER This item is for providing raceway and cable for the interconnection of the grounding transformer neutral CT to the medium voltage switchgear. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(1) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH No. J191-050) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,528.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fifteen (15) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE November 18, 1 2 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 Item 4 - MISCELLANEOUS SUPPORTS, GRATING AND RAILING MODIFICATIONS This item is for modifying aluminum handrails to clear engine flywheels, modifying engine grating supports conflicting with the flywheel guards, and trimning grating support angles to allow installation of lube oil tubing to the engines. Work was required at each of the three engines and includes painting of the modified supports. This item was negotiated with Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(1) of the General Provisions. (Reference: RFI Nos. J191-192, 200 and 202) C ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,178.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 9,759.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days 1 / The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously Issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date February 21, 1991 Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days Original Completion Date October 12, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 103 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 703 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date January 23, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 15 410 855.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 5,686. This Change (Add) (Bedust) $ �J Amended Contract Price $ 1�520 "F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fifteen (15) CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE Novem er 18, 1992 JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1 Board Authorization Date: November 18, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: / / REC,O�MMENENDED BY: , , nq neering Manager construction Manager Date APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Director of Engineer ng ate Cieneqyl Lounsel Me HUNTER CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: (wry A 1a-8-kz- Contractor Date "F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fifteen ("I CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE November 9 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (geduet) $ 75,527.46 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Item 1 - SIGNAL CABLE The Contract Drawings did not provide for the required signal cable for the watts transducer in the electrical switchgear to each of the five engine control panels furnished by the Districts. This provides for the monitoring of the total power generated that is essential in operating the Central Generation Facility. The Contractor was instructed to furnish the necessary labor, conduit and wiring on a negotiated firm lump sum basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2)(A). (Reference: Brown a Caldwell letter dated January 13, 1992 and PCH No. 084). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,892.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - REVISE ELECTRICAL CABLE SPLICES Staff determined that standard butt splice for high voltage electrical cable are better suited for the condition in which they will be installed instead of the specified multi tap cable splice kit which is a mechanical splice. The standard splices will be in electrical manholes where water is present and are more waterproof than the mechanical splice. The Contractor was instructed to use the standard splice on the cable on a negotiated basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(A). (Reference: PCH No. 086). CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (10,923.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 �..� CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fifteen ("I CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE November 19, 1 92 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 Item 3 - REPLACE CABLE RACKS Upon entry into the four existing electrical manholes in order to pull and splice the 12KV high voltage cable, the existing cable racks were found to be badly deteriorated. The deterioration was due to the racks, which are constructed of galvanized steel channels, standing in water. The Contractor was instructed to provide new racks constructed of fiberglass on a time and material basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2)(B). (Reference: PCH No. 090) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 21,786.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - CONTROLS FOR STEAM TURBINE The Contract Drawings and Specifications did not provide for the electrical power or operating controls of the Contractor furnished steam turbine unit in the Central Generation Facility. This included power for the vacuum recirculation water pumps, interface between the steam turbine and the medium voltage switchgear to disperse the power produced by the steam turbine generator, Interface between turbine control panel provided by the Districts and the switchgear and other operating controls. The Contractor was instructed to provide the conduit, wiring and labor necessary on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(2)(b)(B). (Reference Brown 8 Caldwell letters dated January 6, and February 20, 1992 and PCH No. 094). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 41,859.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 5 - ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT TESTING Due to the many additions to the electrical circuits that were not a part of the original contract documents, additional NETA Testing was required. META (National Electrical Testing Association) testing is a standard by which the testing of the differential circuits for the generators and distribution systems were performed. This testing is performed by licensed specialty contractors only. The Contractor was instructed to perform the work on a negotiated firm price basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2) (A). (Reference: PCH No. 103). ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,100.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "G-2" AGENDA ITEM WE) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fifteen CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE November 18, 1(1 25) JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 Item 6 - PUMP STRAINER PIPING The contract drawings provided for the three inch blow off drain line from the plant water strainer located in the Plant water Pump Station to a floor drain and from there to an existing sump pump. When the strainer activated and discharged the cleaning water, the eisiting drain and sump pump system was found to be inadequate, causing flooding of the area and damaging electrical equipment. The Contractor was instructed to reroute the blow off drain line to an existing sump pump discharge header and adding an isolation and a check valve. The work was performed on a force account in accordance with General Provisons Section 10-6(b) (2)(B). (Reference PCH No. 1D2) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,296.17 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 - SEAL CONTROL ROOM The contract drawings did not provide for the sealing of the Operating Control Room in the Central Generation Facilities, particularly where electrical duct banks entered the floor and in the ceiling that is covered with corregated roof deck. During the operation of the engines, fumes would drift into the Control Room creating an irritating atmosphere. Also, the seal on the electrical duct bank would restrain flames and fumes from entering the room in the event of a fire. The Contractor was instructed to install the seals on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(B). (Reference PCH No. 104) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,245.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 8 - REPLACE PRESSURE SWITCHES The pressure switches as specified in the contract documents for the two Instrument Air Compressors created problems in the operation of said compressors. The units would operate for only a short period of time and then shut down. Then they would start up again causing the starters to overheat. The Contractor was instructed to provide new adjustable differential pressure switches on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(B). (Reference Brown and Caldwell 's letter dated May 6, 1992, RFI No. 365 and PCH No. 105) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,272.29 TIME ESTERNSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days `...� "G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 �.� CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fifteen ("I CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE Novembers 8, 199192 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 - TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 75,527.46 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date March 19, 1990 Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days Original Completion Date March 17, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 218 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 948 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date October 21, 1992 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 19,753000.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1,598:469.64 This Change (Add) (Beoust) $ 75,527.46 Amended Contract Price $ 21,426,997.1 "G-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHARGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fifteen (151 CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE November 18, 1992 JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 Board Authorization Date: November 18, .1992 COUNTY OF SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED /BY: RECOMMENDED BY: EWneer ng anager a Construction Manager Date APPROV D BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: a /s, ctorf Engineering a e e( Counsel Date BRINDERSON CORPORATION ACCEPTED BY: Contractor "G-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fourteen (14) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE November 18, 1992 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 1U at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 antl 2, Job No. J-21 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Dedaet) $ 20,044.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or.deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Job No. PI-34-3 Item 1 - ADDED VAPOR SEALS TO POWER BUILDING 5 The Contractor was directed to add vapor seals around the power cable leading from the basement of Power Building 5 into the switchgear located in the main floor of this building. This allows cable to pass from a classified area to a non-classified area without violating the NFPA-820 code. Vapor seals for this area were not shown on the contract drawings. This area was classified as a change order during construction on the P1-34-1 project and as such as not included in the P1-34-3 project. The work was accomplished on a force account basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (B) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-P1343-051) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,062.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 2 - DELETE CONCRETE SEALER ON EXTERIOR DIGESTER WALLS The Contractor was directed to delete the specified concrete sealer on the exterior digester walls. It was determined that the specified sealer was not necessary and may in fact compromise the conformity of the "sacked" concrete surfaces. The credit was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO-P1343-055) CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (3,500.00) TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fourteen (13) 19 CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE November 18, 92 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 1 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, J0b No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants I and 2, Job No. J-21 Item 3 - MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING PIPING TO ACCOMMODATE NEW SLUDGE METERS The contract plans called for two 4-inch magnetic flow meters to be installed into an existing 4-inch diameter pipe. The existing line was discovered to be actually 6 inches in diameter. The Contractor was directed to add four 6" x 4" reducers to shorten the 4-inch pipe lengths included in the meter sections in order to accommodate the existing piping. This item includes the extra labor and materials associated with the reducers which were not shown on the contract plans. The work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-P1343-048) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 944.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 4 - ADDED ACCESS TO JUNCTION BOXES The contract provides for two ,)unction boxes to be installed below grade into an existing 12-inch RCP storm drain line located in the East Perimeter Road. Due to previous history with the existing line and the limited access for cleaning, the Contractor was directed to raise the boxes to grade, thereby adding access to the two referenced boxes. In order to reduce costs, the Districts furnished manhole covers and frames to the Contractor. The remaining work of added framing, concrete and adjusting the manhole to grade was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2) (A). (Reference: PCH-P1343-017) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 635.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fourteen (14) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE November 18, 1992 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21 Item 5 - SLUDGE PRESSURE RELIEF MODIFICATIONS The Contractor was directed to install three 3-inch safety relief valves for the bottom sludge transfer pumps. The contract documents did not clearly show the required valve size . The Contractor sized the valves as 2 inches from infor- mation received from the pump manufacturer and the valve manufacturer. The District required 3-inch valves to eliminate the possibility of future clogging. This item provides for the difference in material costs only difference between the 2-inch and 3-inch valve sizes. The costs were negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 940.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days �i Item 6 - RELOCATE SUPPLY FANS In order to conform to NFPA-820, the fire protection code used as a design criteria for the project, the Contractor was directed to relocate the supply fans on the roof of Control Building 11-14. The fans were located in a hazardous area per the contract drawings and as such would require explosion-proof housing in order to meet the code. The most cost-effective solution was to move the fans out of the classified area and extend the ductwork out to reach the new location. This item includes labor and material for the installation of 24 feet of additional fiberglass ductwork associated with two supply fans. This work was performed on a force account basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-P1343-050) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,956.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 7 - RELOCATE STAIRS ON CONTROL BUILDING ROOF The Contractor was directed to relocate the stairways on the Control Building 11-14 roof when they were discovered to interfere with the HVAC ductwork not yet installed. The two stairways which lead from the roof area up to the digester domes were installed per plans before the conflict was discovered. The most cost effective solution was to relocate the stairs to a new location to avoid the interference. The work was performed on a force account basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-P1343-054) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,078.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days "H-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fourteen (14) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE November 18, 1992 Zurn instructors, Inc. JOB: Construction of Di esters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1- 4-3: Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 0 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-21 and Installation of waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2. Job No. J-21 Item 8 - INSTALL VALVE OPERATORS AT DIGESTERS 7 8 8 The installation of these valves was not shown on the contract plans. The Contractor was directed to install pneumatic valve operators on sludge feed valves for Digesters 7 and 8. The valve operators are Districts furnished and are necessary in order for the new Digester Control System to automatically feed these digesters. The electrical wiring hook-up was shown on the contract drawings to existing valves. The extra work included in this item is the installation of the operator and high pressure air piping. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: PCH-P1343-016) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,073.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days Item 9 - EXTERIOR LIGHTING MODIFICATIONS The Contractor was directed to make several modifications to the exterior lighting fixtures in an effort to provide safe and satisfactory lighting around the digester facility. The modifications included the repositioning of some of the exterior lights over doorways and the addition of four D-1 light fixtures. The work was performed on a force account basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(B) of the General Provisions, (Reference: FCO-P1343-047) ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,856.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 20,044.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed Dncidental to the prime work within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "H-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-4" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fourteen (14) CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE November 18, 1992 Zurn Constructors, Inc. JOB: Construction of Di Nsters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1 Job NO. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation _ Plant No. I, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare acilities at Plants 1 and 2, Jo No. J-21 SUMMARY OF MILESTONE TIME Job No. P1-35-2 Original Contract Date January 26, 1991 Original Milestone Time 365 Calendar Days Original Milestone Completion Date January 27, 1992 Milestone Modification This Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Milestone Modification 28 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Time 393 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Date February 24, 1992 Job No. J-21 Original Contract Date January 28, 1991 Original Milestone Time 180 Calendar Days Original Milestone Completion Date July 26, 1991 Milestone Modification This Change Order 0 Calendar Days Total Milestone Modification 25 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Time 205 Calendar Days Revised Milestone Date August 20, 1991 SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Job No. P1-34-3 Original Contract Date January 28, 1991 Original Contract Time - 900 Calendar Days Original Completion Date July 15, 1993 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 27 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 927 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date - August 11, 1993 Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 27,205,378.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 632,315.54 This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 20,044.00 Amended Contract Price $ 27,857,737.54 "H-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-5" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 6 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Fourteen (141 CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE Novem er 88, 19 urn onstruc ors, nc. JOB: Construction of Di esters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, To o. P1- - ehabilitation of Di esters 9 and 30 at Reclamation Plant No. 1 Job o. P1-35- ; and Installation of aste Digester tias Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J- 1 Board Authorization Date: November 18, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUBMITTED BY: RECOMMENDED BY: —fz— L 9ineering Manager Date f,6nstruction Manager Date APPROVE BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ZIel,7� Director o ngine r ng Date enera ounsel awe ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC. ACCEPTED BY: 4 AV e rontrac t r Date d aRA✓ � ��NNS.,-�5�'� "H-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-6" RESOLUTION NO. 92-157 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN A IFORNIA EDISON COMPANY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN SCEC EQUIPMENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE INTERCONNECTION OF CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated November 18, 1992, wherein the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County grant a service easement to the Southern California Edison Company (SCEC) for right-of-way required to operate and maintain SCEC's substation at Plant No. 2 to accommodate the interconnection Of Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement 1s granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement 1s granted to Southern California Edison Company for construction and operation of the substation in order to transform incoming 66 kV power to 12 kV for usage by the Districts; and, Section 4. That said easement is granted at no cost to Southern California Edison Company; and, Section 5. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District "I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(9) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1" No. 1, `acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6. 7, 11. 13 and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Grant of Easement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting November 18, 1992. `ems' "I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(9) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2 P. 0. BOX 8227 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Eight (6) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE November 18, 1 2 JOB: Portion of Euclid Inter ce for Sewer between Broadwa and Orangethor e Avenue (including City of Anaheim treet mprovemen s ontract o. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and walnut reet Ninth Street Contra -28; and Orangewood D version Sewer, Contract No. 2-2 Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 29,774.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Contract No. 2-29 Item 1 - REMOBILIZE TO COMPLETE CONTRACT 2-29 A portion of the contract work was demobilized due to undisclosed telephone ductbanks at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and State College Boulevard. These undisclosed ductbanks interfered with the completion of the installation of the new sewer line per Change Order No. 1, Item 5. This item is for additional work including transporting the remaining pipe to be installed from Plant No. 2 to the job site, demobilization and remobilization of the Contractor's labor, materials and equipment, replacement of curbs and gutters, sidewalks and additional paving. This work could not be completed until PACBELL relocated the Interfering ductbanks. The time extension for this delay is 128 days. This item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions. ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 29,774.00 TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 128 Calendar Days TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 29,774.00 TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 128 Calendar Days The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed Incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 128 days extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order. "J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "J-1" UVUNiY JANO AIIUN U"IKIWb Uh UNANUt CUUNIT Page 2 of Y P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE ` FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. El hit (8) 1 CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE November 18. JOB: Portion of Euclid Interce for Sewer between Broadwayand Oran ethor e Avenue ncludin 1 of Anahim e treet m rovements ontract No. -2 -3; Kate l a Relief Sewer, between EUCIId Street and wa nut Street Ninth Street) , Contract No. -2 and Orangewood Diversion ewer, ontract No. -2Z SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date December 31, 1990 Original Contract Time 400 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 3, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 128 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 128 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 528 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date June 11, 1992 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price E 7 953 755.00 Prey. Auth. Changes $—"170 958 — This Change (Add) (Bedust) E * 0 Amended Contract Price $ ,t% /44,4b/.btl - Board Authorization Date: November 18, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED BY: R 0 I NDED BY, ngineer ng Manager Date Cionstruction Manager Date AP OV Y:/ APP VED AS TO FORM: Patec or of Engineering ate eneral Cou sel ate STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION ACCEPTED BY: � ��pp c.Y,ru� o zo 9t- ntracto Date "J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "J-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine (9) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE November 18, 1992 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Oran ethor a Avenue including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) , contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer. between Euclid Street and walnut Street Ninth Street F Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29 Amount of this Change Order (Add4 (Deduct) $ (94,677.50) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes In the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD: Change in Item Quantity Unit No. Unit Description From To Difference Price TOTAL 5 LF 33-inch VCP 160.00 163.00 3.00 $ 190.00 = $ 570.00 30 VF 120-inch Manholes 22.00 22.50 0.50 1,400.00 = 700.00 25 EA Remove Manholes 17.00 21.00 4.00 500.00 = 2,000.00 41 LF 27-inch VCP 2450.00 2456.00 6.00 150.00 = 900.00 60 VF 84-inch Manholes 60.00 69.75 9.75 750.00 = 7,312.50 71 EA Adjust Manholes 4.00 5.00 1.00 300.00 = 300.00 SUBTOTAL = $11,782.50 DEDUCT: Change in Item Quantity Unit No. Unit Description From To Difference Price TOTAL 3 LF 48-inch RCP 7200.00 7196.00 4.00 $310.00 = ($1,240.00) 7 VF 84-inch Manholes 260.00 189.50 70.50 840.00 = (59,220.00) 8 VF 72-inch Manholes 26.00 24.50 1.50 960.00 = ( 1,440.00) 11 VF 96-inch Manholes 12.00 0.00 12.00 1,000.00 = (12,000.00) 30 LF 24-inch VCP 85.00 84.00 1.00 140.00 = ( 140.00) 31 LF 12-inch VCP 160.00 155.00 5.00 100.00 = ( 500.00) 33 LF 8-inch VCP 330.00 327.00 3.00 90.00 = ( 270.00) 35 LF 8-inch VCP 100.00 80.00 20.00 120.00 = ( 2,400.00) 36 EA 48-inch Manholes 6.00 5.00 1.00 4,500.00 = ( 4,500.00) 43 VF 72-inch Manholes 60.00 58.50 1.50 700.00 = ( 1,050.00) 69 TONS Asphalt 5790.00 5535.00 255.00 40.00 = (10,200.00) 72 SY Cold Planing 6100.00 1600.00 4500.00 3.00 = (13,500.00) SUBTOTAL = (106,460.00) TOTAL DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ ( 94,677.50) TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days "K-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "K-1" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine (9) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE November 18, 1992 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadwa and Orange hor e Avenue including City of Anaheim Street Improvements , Contract No. 2-25-3; Kat�Rel ief Sewer, between Euclid Street and walnut Street Nf nth Street Contract No. 2-2 ; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29 The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor. SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME Original Contract Date December 31, 1990 Original Contract Time 400 Calendar Days Original Completion Date February 3, 1992 Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days Total Contract Time Extension 128 Calendar Days Revised Contract Time 528 Calendar Days Revised Final Completion Due Date June 11, 1992 Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable Original Contract Price $ 7,953,755.00 Prev. Auth. Changes $ 790,712.58 This Change (Addy (Deduct) $ 94,577.50 Amended Contract Price $ 8,853,790.08 "K-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "K-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3 P. 0. BOX 8227 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 \� CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. Nine (9) CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE November 18, 1992 JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadwa and Oran ethor e Avenue including City of Anaheim Street Improvements , Contract No. -3; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and walnut Street Ninth . treet Contract No. 2-28; and.OrangewoodDiversi�ewer, o� ntract No. � Board Authorization Date: November 18, 1992 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDED �B/Y: l / RECOMMENDED BY: Cis.- _f N.,^..-.�. /O _U-9z &;?- Engineering Manager Date Colftstruction Manager Date APPROV BY: APPROVED AS TO yFORM: rector of ng veering ate rjeneral counsel —bate STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION ACCEPTED BY: ontractor Date "K-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "K-3" RESOLUTION NO. 92-159-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NOS. 2-26-3 2-28 AND 2-29 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PORTION OF EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER, BETWEEN BROADWAY AND ORANGETHORPE AVENUE (INCLUDING CITY OF ANAHEIM STREET IMPROVEMENTS), CONTRACT NO. 2-26-3; KATELLA RELIEF SEWER, BETWEEN EUCLID STREET AND WALNUT STREET (NINTH STREET) , CONTRACT NO. 2-28; AND ORANGEWOOD DIVERSION SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-29, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT k k k k k k k R k k k k k k k k The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Steve Bubalo Construction Co., has completed the construction In accordance with the terms of the contract for Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements), Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street) , Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, on June 11, 1992; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terns of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) , Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street) , Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the la,sl "L-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (3) - DISTRICT 2 "L-1" contract therefor, dated December 31, 1990; and, Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and, Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Steve Bubalo Construction Co., setting forth the terns and conditions for acceptance of Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements), Contract 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street) , Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, is hereby approved and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and, Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992. "L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (3) - DISTRICT 2 "L-2" RESOLUTION NO. 92-160-7 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF ANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN ALIF RNIA E ISON OMPAN A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN SCEC EQUIPMENT WHICH WILL PROVIDE POWER TO MICHELSON PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-11-2 x x x x x x x x x x x x x The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated November 18, 1992, wherein the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County grant a service easement to the Southern California Edison Company (SCEC) to operate and maintain SCEC equipment in the vicinity of Michelson Avenue and the San Diego Freeway east of Jamboree Boulevard, in the City of Irvine, which will provide power to the Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said easement is granted to Southern California Edison Company for maintenance and repair of the voltage transformer and conduits necessary to provide electrical service to Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2; and, Section 4. That said easement is granted at no cost to Southern California Edison Company; and, l , "M-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - DISTRICT 7 "M-1" Section 5. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 7 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Grant of Easement in form approved by the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992. "M-2" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - DISTRICT 7 "M-2" RESOLUTION NO. 92-158 REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR CONTRACT NO. P2-23-5-1 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR OPERATIONS CENTER EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23-5-1, AND AUTHORIZING THE GENERAL MANAGER TO ESTABLISH THE DATE FOR REBID OF SAID PROJECT k k k k k k * * k * * * * * k The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY DETERMINE THAT: WHEREAS, the Districts have published Notice Inviting Bids for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1, in accordance with the provisions of Section 20783 of the Public Contracts Code of the State of California, and on October 6, 1992, publicly opened and read all bids submitted; and, WHEREAS, nine bids have been received on Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1, of which three protests have been filed against Javaid Contractors, Inc. , the apparent low bidder, based on bidding irregularities and lack of bonding capacity by the Surety named on the low bidder's proposal ; and, WHEREAS, correspondence from the Center of Contract Compliance alleging violations against the law and second bidders of Labor Code 1774 on other jobs within this region has been received; and, WHEREAS, Staff and General Counsel have recommended that all bids be rejected and the project rebid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDER: Section 1. That the bid tabulation and recommendation of the Director of Engineering to reject all bids be received and ordered filed; and, I "N-1" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1" Section 2. That all bids for said work be, and are hereby, rejected; and, Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish a bid date for rebid of said project. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992. "N-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS; e1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA October 6, 1992 1O Ews AVENUE ?O WXa,27 11:00 a.m. MWAN VALLEY.GUFORM I a, Two (2) Addenda n,ei s�zza„ BID TABULATION H E ET JOB NO. 122-23-5-1 PROJECT TITLE Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Addition of new locker rooms, offices and remodeling of existing roams at Plant No. Operations Center ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $2,800,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT $2,925,000 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Javaid Contractors, Inc. , Rowland Heights, CA $2,537,193.00 2. The Gorham Co. , Inc. , Corona, CA $2,612,130.00 3. Lewis Jorge Construction Management, Inc. , Baldwin Park, CA $29614,229.00* 4. Jahn R. Hundley, Inc., Garden Grove, CA - $2,716,107.00 v 5. Nationwide Construction Company, Inc. Paramount, CA $2,748,692.00 6. K. W. Western, Inc., Newport Beach, CA $2,824,000.00 7. Hayward Construction Company, Inc., Monrovia, CA $2,887,783.00* 8. A. R. Willinger Co. , Inc. , Newport Beach, CA $2,980,000.00 9. Chartered Construction Co., Los Angeles, CA $3,238,400.00* *Corrected totals--addition errors. I have reviewed the proposals and the protests received for the above projects and recommend that all bids be rejected. 7h (Thomas M. Dawes - Director of Engineering "N-3" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-3" COUNTY SANITATION u DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 29 3, 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ON OCTOBER 14, 1992 \� PNJTATloV o9°libe Q°0/s V R s N N GEC ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE 9 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ROLL CALL A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, S. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on October 14, 1992, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Fall wing the Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quoran present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: x Dan Griset, Chairman Robert Richardson =Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tom —Gene Beyer ma=Thos R. Saltarelli —Leslie A. Pontious 7--Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth z James A. Xahner _James Ferryman DISTRICT NO. 2: Henry N. Metlae, Chairman x John M. Gullixson =Jonn Collins, Chairman pro tom —George Scott =Fred Barrera —_Gene Beyer a Buck Catlin Chris Norby —Barry Denes =Bob Bell =William D. Mahoney James H. Flora =Robert H. Main —Norman Culver =Carrey J. Nelson —Glenn Parker a Arthur G. Newton —John 0. Tynes a Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter —Miguel Pulido z Dan Griset =Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Saplen, Chairman Harry M. Dotson x Burnie Dunlap. Chairman pro cam —Carrey J. Nelson 7—Buck Catlin —Chris Narby =John Collins —_George Scott =Noonan Culver Robert H. Main =James V. Evans —Margie L. Rice =James H. Flora —William 0. Mahoney =Don R. Griffin —_Rhonda J. McCune =Frank Laszlo _Gwen A. Forsythe a Pat McGuigan Robert Richardson =Eva G. Miner —_Larry Herman \ / Richard Partin Cecilia L. Age a Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter =Jim Silva —Earle Rcbitaille x Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth a Charles Sylvia _Ronald Bates DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn PI varier, Chairman _Evelyn Hart xroll Sansone, Chairman pro tem John C. Cox, Jr. =Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A. Wollner, Chairman - Dick Sherrick =Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tam —Ruthelyn Plumper x Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Thames R. Saltarelli =James A. Mahner, Chai man pro tem —Nate Reade =Fred Barrera —_Gene Beyer =John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn Plummer a Robert Richardson —Miguel Pulldo =Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton =Sally Anne Sheridan x Barry Hamnond DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Linda Moulton-Patterson =Jack Kelly, Chairman pro two —Don MacAllister =Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M. Gullixson, Chairman Henry M. Medea =Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tell —6ene Beyer =Glenn Parker —Burnie Dunlap a Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter =Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller Leslie A. Pontious, Chairman pro tan z Charles E. Puckett =Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer =Don R. Roth --Roger Stanton =Sally Anne Sheridan x Barry Hammond -2- ' 10/14/92 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, 1 ' Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, �a..✓ Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Catherine Biele, Corrine Clawson, Patti Gorczyca, Ed Hodges, John Linder, Bob Ooten, L. Ellen Ray, Lynn Redman, Mary Simpson, Jack Vincent OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Jamel Demir, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf, John Shaw, Phil Stone ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman briefly commented Report of the Joint Chairman on brochures included in the Directors' meeting folders relative to the increase in sewer service fees. He requested that Directors provide copies of the brochures in their respective city halls to have available to their constituents, informing then of the necessity of increasing sewer service rates because of the recent confiscation of Districts' property taxes by the Governor and State Legislature. He also reported that a short video explaining the Sanitation Districts' wastewater management program and why it was necessary to increase the annual sewer service fees for 1992-93 is almost complete and should be available for distribution soon. Joint Chairman Mahoney then announced that the Fiscal Policy Committee was scheduled to meet on Wednesday, October 21st, at 5:30 p.m. He also reported that the Ad Hoc Committee for Service to Outside Areas was scheduled to meet on Thursday, October 22nd, at 5:30 p.m. Chairman Mahoney also called a meeting of the Executive Committee for Wednesday, October 28th, at 5:30 p.m., and invited Directors Fred Barrera and John Collins to attend. He added that the Building Committee, originally scheduled to meet on November 4th, was now changed to meet on Thursday, October 29th, at 5:30 p.m. Joint Chairman Mahoney also reminded the Directors that next month's regular meeting date of November 11th, at 7:30 p.m. had been rescheduled to November 18th, at 7:30 p.m. due to the Veterans' Day holiday. -3- 10/14/92 ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Sylvester reported that a report Report of the General Manager had been received from the Orange �...� County Treasurer-Tax Collector dated September 1, 1992 on the investment of Districts' reserve funds. The total interest earned on Districts' investments of the Districts' funds for fiscal year 1991-92 was $20.7 million, a net yield of 8.72%. The General Manager further reported that included in the Directors' meeting folders was the final offering statement for the $98.5 million Series C Certificates of Participation issue which was sold on September 1, 1992. ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Sylvester explained that it is a Presentation of mementos re tradition among underwriters to give 190-92 Series C COP issues mementos to key people involved in securities issues like the Districts recent Series C Certificates of Participation. He then had staff distribute mementos from the underwriter, Merrill Lynch, to Directors on the Board during the Series C debt issues. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 9, 1992, and the adjourned meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 9, �✓ 1992. and the adjourned meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 9, 1992, and the adjourned meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 9, 1992, and the adjourned meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 9, 1992, and the adjourned meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or • Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 9, 1992, and the adjourned meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman 1�/ ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. -4- 10/14/92 DISTRICT li There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 9, 1992, and the adjourned meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 9, 1992, and the special meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or pproyal of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the regular meeting held September 9, 1992, and the special meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of Joint and Individual District claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. tJ 9/09/92 9/23/92 ALL DISTRICTS Joating Fund - E 622,250.11 E1,367,972.96 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,264,469.54 1,877,141.52 Joint Working Capital Fund - 113,813.08 139,015.32 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 4919759.53 119,701.16 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 575.28 43,616.49 DIST - 9,492.39 556,758.50 DISTRI - 28,354.35 35,756.81 D STR N . 5 - 57,918.26 261,193.03 DISTRICT NO. 6 - 26.94 182.39 DISTRICT NS.7 - 87,356.73 29,777.25 DI TRI—CT N7. 11 - 6,963.94 880.86 DISTRI T 1 - -0- 37.80 DI TRICT N . 14 - 8,425.66 164,857.73 DI TRI T 0 . 5 8 6 JOINT - -0- 4,710.51 DISTRICTS NOS. &_7 JOINT - 2,638.41 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 8 14 JOINT - 27.10 6 258.93 TT 4, 1.3 $4,607,'861.26 -5- 10/14192 ALL DISTRICTS Act ons re central Laboratory, Job No. J-17 Approving Change Order No. 13 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: the plans and specifications for Job No. J-17 That Change Order No. 13 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net addition of $51,362.52 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for six items of added or deleted work, and granting a time extension of 40 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Job No. J-17 as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-1-37, accepting Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17 as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 14 to the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 14 to the plans Job No. J-19-1 and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $91,002.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for seven items of additional work, be, and is hereby, �... approved. Approving Change Order No. 8 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: lans and specifications for Job No. - -1 That Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for Control Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, authorizing an addition of $21,017.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for one item of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Pum tation Telemetry and Monitoring 3ystem. Job No. J-28 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications for Job No. J-28 That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28, changing the date for receipt of bids from June 9, 1992 to July 7, 1992, be, and is hereby, approved. ... -6- 10/14/92 A rovin Addendum No. 2 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: Mans and s ecifications for Job No. J-ZIJ That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28, changing the date for receipt of bids from July 7, 1992 to August 4, 1992, be, and is hereby, approved. Appr2V ing Addendum No. 3 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: ans and s ecif tattoos for Job No. J-ZU That Addendum No. 3 t'o the plans and specifications for Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28, deleting three pump stations; revising requirements; and making miscellaneous technical modifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 4 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: lens and specifications for Job Na. -J That Addendum No. 4 to the plans and specifications for Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28, deleting one pump station and making miscellaneous technical modifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Rejecting all bids for Job No. J-28 Moved, seconded and duly carried: due �tware ced spot That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-138, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation, rejecting all bids for Pump Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28, due to software license dispute; and, FURTHER MOVED: That Districts' staff and Counsel be, and is hereby, directed to reformulate and rebid the job following resolution of the software licensing issue. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: eiveo ileea ro wr1tFe—n— ri or ,fh Fp iscaPolict That the written report of the Fiscal , ommittee and Executive committee Policy Committee and Executive Committee meetings held on September 23, 1992, be and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. �..� -7- 10/14/92 DISTRICTS 1. ✓ Actions er a2n i3 o e6 a e8m e1n of consulting finance team members for Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series 8,,r2MIE2 Letter A reement with Moved, seconded and duly carried: PaineWebber for untle rwri ing services That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-144, approving Letter Agreement with PaineWebber, dated June 30, 1992, for underwriting services, for an amount not to exceed $8.50 per $1,000 certificate, for a fixed-rate restructuring, or $3.50 per $1,000 certificate for a synthetic fixed-rate restructuring, and rescinding Resolution No. 92-90. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. A rovin Letter A reement with Moved, seconded and duly carried: utl a Rose u hrie Alexander and erdon for special Co-Bond Counsel That the Boards of Directors services hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-145, approving Letter Agreement with Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon, dated June 18, 1992, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, based on per diem rates, for an amount not to exceed $80,000.00 for a fixed-rate issue, plus an �✓ amount not to exceed $30,000.00 for the additional synthetic fixed-rate work, plus expenses, and rescinding Resolution No. 92-91. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. A rovin Memorandum A reement with Moved, seconded and duly carried: Rour e 8 Woo ruf fors ec al Co-Bond Counsel services That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-146, approving Memorandum Agreement with Rourke 8 Woodruff, dated June 30, 1992, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, for a maximum fee not to exceed $15,000.00, and rescinding Resolution No. 92-92. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Authorizin the en a Let of Moved, seconded and duly carried: rrick Herrin ton as un erwr ters counsel That the engagement of Orrick Herrington as underwriters' counsel , and providing for the cost of said services to be included in the cost of issuance paid to PaineWebber, and rescinding Minute Order of July 8, 1992, be, and is hereby, approved. -8- 10/14/92 DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5, 6 7 8 11 - Actions re RefundingCertificates ot Participation, 1 er es Approving Refunding Certificates Moved, seconded and duly carried of Participation, 1Serf er es by each respective District: That its Board of Directors hereby adopts the following resolution , approving Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series, pursuant to the Boards' adopted long-range financial plan: DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. COP MAXIMUM AMOUNT 1 92-147-1 $29,500,000 2 92-148-2 63,500,000 3 92-149-3 59,500,000 5 92-150-5 7,000,000 6 92-151-6 2,2509000 7 92-152-7 5,500,000 11 92-153-11 2,750,000 Said resolutions authorize issuance of Certificates of Participation by each respective District in the principal amounts indicated above and aggregate principal amount not to exceed $170,000,000; and: - Approve and authorize printing and distribution of the Preliminary and Final Official Statement (informs potential investors about terms) - - Authorize payment to the credit rating agencies, Standard and Poor's and Moody's (estimated amount $30,000.00 each) - Authorize completion of the following legal documents: *Acquisition Agreement.......Details each District's participation and projects °Assignment Agreement........Allows Trustee to pay investors *Trust Agreement.............Instructions for Trustee Bank °Escrow Agreement............Sets forth the duties and responsibilities of , the escrow agent *Certificate Purchase Agreement...................Sets forth terms and conditions of sale between Districts and underwriter PaineWebber -9- 10/14/92 a Interest Rate SWAP Agreement...................Sets forth terms and conditions of interest between Districts and counterparty °Liquidity Guarantee Agreement...................Guarantees a liquidity facility at 25 basis points annual fee *Guarantee of American International Group, Inc....Guarantees performance on SWAP agreement *Offering Statement..........Informs potential investors about the terms and conditions of the financing a Standby Bond Purchase Agreement...................Sets forth the terms and conditions of the liquidity facility *Remarketing Agreement.......Sets forth the duties and responsibility of the remarketing agent - Authorize execution and delivery of synthetic fixed rate advance refunding COPS, subsequent to the negotiation process, with final terms to be determined by finance team, but not to exceed $170 million and a term of 25 years - Authorize underwriter's (PaineWebber) fees not to exceed $3.50/$1,000 certificate for synthetic fixed rate transaction - Authorize selection of State Street Bank and Trust Company as Trustee Bank (estimated gross fee over 21-year life of Issue is $70,000.00) - Select KPMG Peat Marwick as verification agent (one-time fee is $3,500.00) ' - Authorize selection of AMBAC as municipal bond insurer (fee is 27 basis points) - Approve Master Interest Exchange (SWAPS) and approve liquidity facility with American International Group, Inc. -10- 10/14/92 - Approve a Mutual Benefit Advances Agreement, sometimes referred to as a "Cross-Collaterilization Agreement", between the participating Districts Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. Authorizin finance team to Moved, seconded and duly carried: determine and im lemen the best combination of financ n a erna- That the finance team be, and is tives to obtain the most favorable hereby, authorized to determine overall terms and conditions for and implement the best he Refundinq Certificates of combination of the debt financing Participation, 1 92 beries alternatives to obtain the most favorable overall terms and conditions for the Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series, based on the market conditions during the transaction time frame; and, FURTHER MOVED: That each District Chairman or Chairman pro tem, Board Secretary, General Manager, Director of Finance, General Counsel and any other duly-constituted officer or agent be, and are hereby, authorized to execute any and all documents necessary and advisable to effectuate the transactions. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file an a rove written report of he Fiscal Po cy That the written report of the Fiscal Committee Policy Committee meeting held on �..� September 28, 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICTS 1 2 3, 5 6 7 8 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratif in al ton of scal Polic Committee in directing staff o That the action of the Fiscal Policy negotiate a reversal of the Committee in directing staff to existin three- ear WAP relative - negotiate a reversal of the existing to the 1990-1992 Ca Ital three-year SWAP relative to the Improvement Program, Series .Is 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program, Issue Series B COP Issue, when deemed appropriate by staff and the financing team, subject to the concurrence of the Chairman of the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Joint Chairman, be, and is hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: anging the regular November 11, 1992 meetin of the oint oards to That the regular Joint Board meeting November la, 19VZ date of November 11, 1992, be, and is _ hereby, changed to Wednesday, November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. due to the Veterans' Day holiday. -11- 10/14/92 ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the eneral Counsel 's Comments Prior to Directors of the need for a closed Closed ess ion session as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9 to review: 1) Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to the co-generation internal combustion engines. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Convene in closed session oursuant o Government ode bection The Boards convened in closed session 54956.9 at 8:03 p.m. pursuant to Govenment Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 8:45 p.m. the Boards reconvened 7n Reconvene in regular session regular session. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to Wednesday, November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:45 p.m., October 14, 1992. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to Wednesday, November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:45 p.m., October 14, 1992. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to Wednesday, November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:45 p.m., October 14, 1992. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to Wednesday, November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:45 p.m., October 14, 1992. ..✓ -12- 10/14/92 DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: 1 J Adjournment �..✓ That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned to Wednesday, November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:45 p.m. , October 14, 1992. DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned to Wednesday, November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:45 p.m. , October 14, 1992. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Chan, an a Order No. 5 to the l ans and s ecif cations for That Change Order No. 5 to the plans ontract No. 5-34-3 and specifications for Improvements to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer, Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, authorizing an addition of $303,271.00 to the contract with Silveri 8 LeBouef for 12 items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. DISTRICTS 5 8 6 Actions re Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky oint Pum t ,ations ontract No. 5-32. and Im on rovements to BayBridge Pum `...� Stati , ontract No. 5-3.3 staff report The Director of Engineering reported that Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, would be upgrading and modernizing three older pump stations in Newport Beach along Pacific Coast Highway. Each pump station will receive major electrical upgrades and other work, but the Bay Bridge Pump Station, which was completed 1n 1966, would receive major mechanical , seismic and architectural upgrades as well. Mr. Dawes advised that six bids had been received, and he recommended approval of Addendum No. 1 and awarding the contract to the corrected low bidder, Uhler, Inc. , in the amount of $1,765,757.00. Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: ions and s ecifications for Contract Nos. -32 and -33 That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, making miscellaneous technical clarifications and modifications, be, and is hereby, approved. l -13- 10/14/92 Awarding Contract Nos. 5-32 and Moved, seconded and duly carried: 5-3T That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-14D, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for said project to Uhler, Inc. , in the total corrected amount of $1,765,757.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: A journment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to Wednesday, November 18, 1992 at 7:3D p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:45 p.m. , October 14, 1992. DISTRICT 5 Actions re South Coast Trunk Sewer Phase 2, contract No. - 5- Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering reported that in March 1988, District 5 entered into a financing and construction agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) which provided for funding of the South Coast Trunk Sewer by IRWD. The South Coast Trunk Sewer will serve the new downcoast development by The Irvine Company located south of Corona del Mar. During 1989 it became apparent that the South Coast Trunk Sewer would be split into two phases. Phase 1, approximately 4,700 feet of sewer between the southerly city limit and a point south of Newport Coast Drive, was completed in January 1991. Phase 2 will begin south of Newport Coast Drive to a point south of Crystal Cove. Because the South Coast Trunk Sewer takes the same alignment of Pacific Coast Highway and because the realignment and widening of Pacific Coast Highway through the Crystal Cove area was delayed by new highway alignment, Phase 2 was also delayed. Mr. Dawes further reported that this contract was originally planned to be included in a larger County of Orange construction project for improvements to Pacific Coast Highway as a separate bid item. However, when bids were received, the bid item for the District 5 work was much higher than anticipated. Therefore, he stated, staff notified the County to have this contract deleted from their project and the District will now bid Contract No. 5-35-2 separately, and noted that some additional work on the plans and specifications would be necessary to accomplish this. The funding for this work would be in accordance with the 1988 agreement with IRWD which provides for IRWD reimbursement of construction costs after project completion. He then recommended approval of the plans and specifications and authorization for the General Manager. to establish the bid date for this contract. -14- 10/14/92 Approving plans an tl specifications Moved, seconded and duly carried: for Contract No. 5-35-2 That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-139-5, approving plans and specifications for South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract No. 5-35-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to Wednesday, November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:45 p.m. , October 14, 1992. DISTRICT 7 Actions re Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2 Approving Change Order No. 3 to the Moved, seconded and duty carried: plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-11-2 That Change Order No. 3 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of $73,000.00 to the contract with Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. for one item of additional work, �...� be, and is hereby, approved. Accepting Contract No. 7-11-2 as Moved, seconded and duly carried: complete That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-141-7, accepting Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2, as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, That the Board of Directors hereby Contract No. 7-14-1-1, % Silveri adopts Resolution No. 92-142-7, 8 LeBouef, JV receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-1-1, to Silveri 8 LeBouef, JV, in the total amount of $90,732.00. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. -15- 10/14192 DISTRICT 7 Actions re adoption of Resolution �.,.� of Necessity to acquire Easement b ondemnation for Abandonment of Overhi ll Pum tat on Phase 1, Contract No. 7-1 - -1 Verbal report of staff and General The Director of Engineering Counsel reported that for several years actions have been taken by the District to allow for the abandonment of ten pump stations on the east side of Tustin Hills. These pump stations currently pump wastewater westerly over the hills, but would otherwise drain easterly towards Peters Canyon Wash and the Irvine Ranch Water District's (IRWD) recently constructed Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer (HATS) , currently in District No. 14 and IRWD. He further reported that in December 1991 the Directors approved a reimbursement agreement with IRWD for construction of two sewer laterals to HATS along with IRWD's construction of certain reaches of HATS through Peters Canyon Wash. These two laterals are for future gravity sewer connections to allow the abandonment of the Bent Tree and Overhill Pump Stations. Mr. Dawes also stated that in June 1992, the Directors approved another agreement with IRWD for District 7 to purchase 3.92 MGD of capacity in the HATS to accommodate flows redirected by the future abandonment of District 7 pump stations. Once the latest reach of HATS is completed and the additional infrastructure is built to allow District 7 to physically make the connections, it will be possible to abandon most of the District 7 pump stations. The Irvine Company has already granted to District 7 one permanent easement for the Bent Tree lateral and another for the Overhill Pump Station. However, a second easement is necessary for abandonment of Overhill Pump Station over a portion of Lot A of Tract No. 5369 which appears to be owned by Trailside Homes, a Joint Venture. This Lot A is a common lot, not developable. Trailside Homes granted an irrevocable offer to dedicate Lot A to the County of Orange in 1979 for park purposes but the offer was never accepted. Trailside Homes may still be the owner. However, property taxes have not been paid and the firm may no longer exist. The former partners of the Trailside Homes joint venture, Cameo Homes and Lucas Development, deny that Trailside Homes exists and will not individually or collectively grant to District 7 the required easement. The Districts have offered to purchase the easement at fair market value of approximately $2,500.00 which is much less than taxes owning on the parcel of approximately $15,000.00. Mr. Dawes stated, therefore, that it was necessary to proceed with eminent domain proceedings. The Assistant General Counsel , John Shaw, then explained eminent domain • procedures to acquire the easement. -16- 10/14/92 Hearing The Chairman announced that this was the time and place fixed by �..� the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 for a hearing relative to adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to acquire an Easement by Condemnation pertaining to Abandonment of Overhill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-9-1. Open hearing The Chairman declared the hearing open at 8:00 p.m. Close hearing The Chairman closed the hearing at 8:01 p.m. Ado tin Resolution of Necessit re Moved, seconded and duly carried: ac uis ion of Easement b condemnation That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-143-7, adopting a Resolution of Necessity to acquire an Easement by Condemnation pertaining to Abandonment of Overhill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-9-1. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to Wednesday, November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:45 p.m., October 14, 1992. Assistant Secr ry the Boards of Directors o Coun o Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 ... -17- FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/03/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCURTY SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF CRANCE COUNTY CLAIMS FAID U9/4'9/92 POSTING 007E 09/09/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124453 ACCU-LAES RESEARCH INC 9320.u0 LAB SERVICES 124494 ACVARCC C(NSIRUCIOPS INC $582.597.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-3, P2-35-2 124495 AIR PNCCLCTS L CHEMICAL IN 116.BIS.Ci OAN AGREEMENT CRY. GEN SYST. M.O.8-9-89 124496 AMER ASSOC OF ENGINEERING ETC 3239.00 PUBLICATIONS 124497 AMERICAN CABLING 3 COMM $254.81 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES 324458 RCRCC INC 1/CO APERICAN SEALS 1446.75 HARDWARE 124454 AFERICAN TYPE CLLIUP.E COLLECT6 SIOO.VU LAB SUPPLIES 124506 OLAME P ANOLRSCN $144.96 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 124501 ANINTEP . DISTRIBUTION 3759.15 ELECTRICAL PARTS 124502 APCO VALVE L FPIPER COPP 59.094.6R FITTINGS 1245C3 A-PLLS SISTEPS 12.558.72 ADVERTISING 1245L4 ABATEM SERVICES INC 37.460.91 UNIFORM RENTALS I24505 ASSOC. ADMINIS. L CONSULTANTS 1765.VC MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR 124506 AUTO SMOF EQUIPMENT CO 31P110•IB PARTS MASHER 124507 RMM LARCf ILL 55.722.5E RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 1245C0 ERA SAFETY L SLPPLY 5708.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES C77 125509 BANANA BLLEPRINT 3511.29 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES X 124510 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 599R.84 BATTERIES = 124!I1 BANTER CIAGNCSTICS INC $10,241.73 LAB SUPPLIES 124512 J L H FERGE INC 362.39 LAB SUPPLIES CD 124513 PIC IECP FI 7. INC $42.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT 124514 BOLEN RADIATOR SERVICE $211.28 TRUCK REPAIRS 224515 BOOT BARN $140.42 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES n 124516 RPEN6ER-FIEOLEN L ASSOC IN $199.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES I 124517 BRCWA 3 CALCUELL CONSLLIING $83.950.55 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19, J-I1-1 �-' 124518 SUILOEP-S EMPGRIUM _ 5290.15 HARDWARE 124529 BURKE ENGINEERING CO S1.069.26 MOTORS 124520 GARY F $TREED 32.390.16 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 124521 C P 1 3949.90 ELECTRIC PARTS 124522 CALTRCL INC $728.27 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124523 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE CO 5310.OJ SEMINAR REGISTRATION 124524 JOHN CAROLED ENGINEERS $155.228.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-34, PI-36, PI-20 124!25 CENTLRY SAFELY EAST L SLFP 31.760.23 SAFETY SUPPLIES 121526 CNEVRCN LSA INC 33024.38 OIL 6 GREASE 124527 CHILTCN BOCK CO $1T7.79 PUBLICATION 124528 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO $5.156.00 LAB EQUIPMENT 124529 COLICH AND SONS 383.166.30 CONSTRUCTION 7-3E-2 124530 CCPPLTER BAY $829.60 LAB SUPPLIES 124511 CCPPLSA. IPC• 33.607.01 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE 1245-2 CC6NELL FP FARIS / DIV $60.64 TRUCK PARTS 129533 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4.675.30 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 124534 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC SI.205.07 TOOLS 124535 CCNVEPSE CCNSULTANTS 0 C 310.104.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9 124E-6 CCCPIP INELSTRIES INC $1,109.31 COMPUTER PARTS 1245.7 C(L611 6XILESALE ELECTRIC $1.574.34 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 12,536 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS 3376.78 SAFETY SUPPLIES FUND NC 9199 • JI FIST YCRNINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/03/92 F06L 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CEUN77 SANI7A7ICN DISTRICTS OF GRANCE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID WJ9/92 POSTING DATE u9/09/92 WARRANT NO. VFNOOA AMOUNT DESCPIPIION 124539 CPCSPE S CEERICN INC. 5300.0R VACUUM TRUCE SERVICES 129544 CHtPLES F CPCWLET CO SM9.58 PUMP PARTS 124541 J.L. O-ANGELO CO INC 31.U69.98 PIPE 12150E DANIELS TIRE SERVICE a653.1N TIRES 124543 DATA STOOP 576.O0 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 124S4/ DE ARIA CORFCRATIOA $3,349.87 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 124545 DIALOG INFGRPATICN SERVICES $39.97 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 124546 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 55.667.9E CHEMICALS 129547 DIGITAL EGUIFPERT COOP $2.000.9N OFFICE EQUIPMENT 124548 CCRACC EATERPRISES INC $13.65J.11 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 120E49 CURN EC61ROS CCRP 5212.2E PAINT SUPPLIES 124550 DYNEX 12.724.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124551 E.C.9. S6B2.UC PUBLICATION 129552 CIP CO/APS SUFFLY 3521.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124553 EASTPAN INC S1.454.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121554 ESENHARC EQUIFMERT- $52.24 TRUCE PARTS fT7 124555 EOUC6TIONAL DEVELOPMENT SPEC 58.50O.Ou ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CONTRIBUTION X 124556 ENCHANTER INC 34.400.03 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 2 1245E7 FALCCN CIEFCIAL SFPVTCE 53.38J.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 124558 JCHN P FALKENSTEIN AE S3.42J.G0 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16 124559 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP $955.00 AIR FREIGHT 224560 FERRELLGAS SLTB.61 PROPANE 124561 CHEMVEST INC $83.98 FREIGHT a 124"2 FTLTERLIRE CORP $96.33 FILTERS N 12A563 FILTER SLPFLIY CC SI.367.U3 FILTERINSURANCE 124564 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INFURA 59JO.00 124565 FI SC HER R PORTER CO 56.796.E0 CHLORINATION PARTS 1245E6 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 31.094.49 LAB SUPPLIES 124SE7 FISGAS IRSTRUMTRiS $999.38 LAB EQUIPMENT 1295EB FLAP/ SCIENTIFIC. INC. $495.30 LAB SUPPLIES 12A569 FELAINEh VALLEY CAPFPA $225.u1 FILM 124570 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES $200.34 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124572 THE FOARERO CD $1.852.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124572 FRAZEE PAINT G VALLCOVER166 $94.73 PAINT SUPPLIES 124573 CITY CF FLLLERTCN $5.50 WATER USE 12457♦ GST. INC. 55.130.12 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 129575 GA6AHL LUMBER CO S476.54 HARDWARE/LUMBER 12057E GENCPAL IELEPHONE CO $239.09 TELEPHONE SERVICES 124577 CLCO6L CCPFUTFR SUFPLIES 5190.89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 124578 6W GRAINGER INC 5506.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124579 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 52.91S.62 PHOTO SUPPLIES 1245EC RCN GPEEN R ASSOCIATES 515.303.P0 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-11-92 124501 DAVIC P. CPIFFIN 53.500.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.12-I1-91 1245E2 ARTHLR C ELY III ASSCC. 52.001.98 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 124503 HSL TECHNOLOGY $388.996.84 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2, P2-E9 124584 HACH COMPANY $72.U0 LAB SUPPLIES C FUND NC 5199 Jl GIST 6EAHIAL CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE ^/O3/92 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AF95 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNT? CLAIMS FAIO 09/09/92 POSTING DATE 09/09/92 UARRAN'7 KC. VEKCCP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 120SB5 HAPPINGIDN INDUSTRIAL ILASTI 3TS1.50 GAUGE 124566 HAULAWAY CONTAINENS $4.660.OJ TRASH REMOVAL SERVICES 1245B7 PL F&VN CO INC $565.90 FILTERS 1245PA HILTI INC 9154.19 CONCRETE 120565 MCBARI CCFF 21.831.8E LAB SUPPLIES 124590 RC HGFFFAK AAD/CR ISCC $1.267.14 LAB SUPPLIES 120591 HORIBA $5.247.43 ELECTRIC PARTS 124592 J.1. HORVATH E ASSOC. 53.000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-07 124593 AS HL'GHES CC INC 1651.63 PAINT SUPPLIES 1245S4 HUNTER CCFFCRATICN 182A.119.50 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 124595 CI7Y OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 523.157.UC WATER USE 224596 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER SIA A19.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES 121597 HUNTINGIOK VALLEY SCHNINN C 5161.36 BICYCLE PARTS 1295SB HYCMACOK CCPPANV $716.62 LAB SUPPLIES 129559 IPPFRI&L VEST CHEMICAL 940.190.68 FERRIC CHLORIDE H.0.11-19-90 128600 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $520.57 CONNECTORS m 121601 INGRAM PAFER 5933.55 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES X 124602 INTERPOLKIAIN SCIENTIFIC COPF 52.329.97 LAB SUPPLIES Z 124603 /R7EPSIATE FATIERY SYSTFPS SB21.N'_ BATTERIES 124604 GRLAI NESTER& SANITARY SUIT $516.98 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124605 JAI-S CATERING 5867.19 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES - --1 124606 JIM.S SUSPENSION SERVICE S25.U0 TRUCE REPAIRS n 124607 JCHNSIOAE SLFFLV 5868.01 ELECTRIC PARTS 1246CO JCNFS CPIPICALS INC 52.091.9E CHEMICALS W 129EL9 JCPCAK ECIIRCLE INC S298.113 INSTRUMENT PARTS 12061. KA&CIER TRSULATICR INC $610.61 INSULATION INSTALLATION 124611 KEENAN L ASSOCIATES S2.475.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES 124612 KING BEARING INC 5395.81 MACHINE SUPPLIES 124613 KRCY INDUS7RIAL SUFFLIES 52.713.90 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT 124614 PARTIN CERDICK SP $1.599.70 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 124615 LAFALE $75.03 MEMBERSHIP FEES 124616 LA CELLOLAM IELEFFONE CC 5093.17 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 124617 LA MOTTO CHEMICAL PRODUCTS - $99.90 CHEMICALS 124618 LANTPCNIY S242.0♦ OFFICE EQUIPMENT 124619 LAUR PARK ENTERPRISE S4.267.98 TRUCE PARTS 124620 LIEREPI CERFCPAl1OK 520.130.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 124622 LIMI TER6UE CORP 59.577.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124622 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S459.000.00 COOP AGREE - MONTROSE CHEMICAL 124623 PAC AFPLIED FNVIKOKMENIAL 5933.33 LAB SERVICES 124624 SL'SAR MLRCCTT $236.30 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 124625 HIS 5510.79 FACTO SERVICES 124626 MAIAIENAACE PROCUCTS INC 52.921.82 MECHANICAL PARTS 124627 MA&L1C MOTORS SISO.G0 TOWING SERVICES 124620 MARTEN $419.24 GROUNOSKEEPING SUPPLIES 124629 M6PVAC ELECTRONICS S7.711 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124630 PA17 - IHLGR INC 51.956.51 CHLORINATION PARTS FUND NC 9199 - JT GIST 6(PKIKG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/03192 FADE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP43 C(UR1Y ZAN17ATICN DISTRICTS OF CRAAGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 49/79/92 POSTING DATE 19139192 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124631 MCBAIA IKSTRLMENTS 5995.NC SERVICE AGREEMENT 1246-2 EICN( PCTICK 52/9.17 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124633 NICROAGE COMPUTER $2.277.63 LAB SUPPLIES 121631 MICROAGC OF CERRITOS 3687.75 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 121615 MICRCPICS CCRPOPATICN 913.398.u5 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 12/636 PILLIRORICS 33.995.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 1246-7 FI3CC S6.875.75 MECHANICAL PARTS 129f38 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL INC $179.95 PUBLICATION 12/639 PONTGONERY LABORATORIES 910.833.75 LAB SERVICES 121640 MCTICK INDUSTRIES INC $1.852.9/ MECHANICAL PARTS 12/6/1 CITY OF AEYP(R7 PEACH $28.22 WATER USE 121642 CCCLPAIICPPL V151CR SERVICES S473.01 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY GLASSES 121613 GX SVSIEFS CO 127.867.71 CHLORINE M.O.1O-9-91 124644 ORANGE COUNTY CHENICAL CO $659.83 CHEMICALS 124645 ORANGE VALVE C FITTING CO. f1.559.97 FITTINGS 191646 GXVGEA SERVICE $557.95 SPECIALTY GASSES 12/617 CCLNIV SARIIATI(K CISTRICI 5915.20 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE rn 121648 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 1295.6E SAFETY SUPPLIES Z 121619 PACIFIC DELL f1 .61 TELEPHONE SERVICES 12/6!1 PETEL PEPIDIPN SYSTEMS 3395 3395.6E TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS W 121651 PEAT PAP4ICN FAIR i [C $10.900.00 AUDITING SERVICES M.O.3-13-91 12/653 FICXLICX PAPER .662.40 OFFICE CONSTRUCTIONES RETENTION 5-34-3 124654 PICKECR BARE 159193.1U 1 124655 PLTYINS BOYES 3$44.06 HARDWARE MACHINE LEASE 121655 PLAINS ICS.TRUEVALUE HARDWARE f1A.08 EQUIPMEB D 12165E PCLYFETNIC S. IN[. .039.O8 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 12/657 OWE RUBE INC f2/$186.03 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92 12965E POWER ONE LINEAR PP OD UCT f186.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124659 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $518.00 ICE 1246E0 PRCFESSICNAL TREE CARE 31.903.00 LANDSCAPING SERVICES 124663 THE FRDCECI SCLUTIONS CO. $2.360.110 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91 124662 QUEST IRTERNAIICAAL INC $938.75 INSTRUMENT 124663 AND ENGINEERING/P.ILLTPONICS 11.113.75 TRANSDUCER 1246E1 PAINPCV OISPCSAL CC f1.430.69 TRASH REMOVAL 124GE5 RECYC IRE 946.904.12 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-13-91' 121666 NEC LIRE SMES $219.98 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 12/667 PLH4TE METER RESETTING SYST f5.400.Ou POSTAGE 12166E MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $3.930.67 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 1246E9 J R PCRERIS $01.143.37 CONSTRUCTION J-17 12/670 RIVAL TRLCN BCCY $376.71 TRUCK PARTS 12/671 AYAA-PERC( $1,786.67 PUMP PARTS 129672 JO BE NI 1 PYERSCK i SIR IN 5646.53 STEEL 120673 SANCON ENGINEERING INC $1.325.CO ENGINEERING SERVICES 12/679 SARTA FE IRCUSTRIAL PLASTICS $105.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124675 SCIEACE FFFLICAIICRS IAT-L $137.693.55 OCEAN MONITORING H.O.6-12-91 124676 SEA COAST DESISKS 527.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES FURS NO 9199 JT OIST WCPKIKG CAPITAL PPOCESSIKG CATE 9/03192 PAGE 5 R EPORI NUMBER AP53 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/09/92 POSTING DATE 09/09/92 WARRANT NO. VEKCGR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 125677 SEARS ROEBUCK L CO $957.19 LAB EQUIPMENT 125676 SEAVENTURES L1.125.JO LAB SERVICES 125679 SECURITY SFECIALISTS f2.159.32- SECURITY SYSTEM PARTS 325620 SENCERE f2.095.05 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT 125681 SHAMROCK SUFFLY $92.02 SAFETY SUPPLIES 125682 SHERWOOD MEDICAL CO f1.99T.P.6 LAB SUPPLIES 125EP3 SPURELUCK SALES $2.955.3A TOOLS 1256E5 SIEVERS IKSTPLPEKTATICN $255.50 LAB SUPPLIES 125685 SIGMA CNEPICAL CO f1.578.55 LAB SUPPLIES 12,686 SILVERI 6 LE UOUEF $53,961.61) CONSTRUCTION 5-35-3 125667 SMITH-EMERY CO 2200.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91 125622 SPITE FIFE L SUPPLY INC $674.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 125FP9 SC CCAS7 AIR CLALITY $292.50 PERMIT FEES/TMINING REGISTRATION 125k50 SCL7PEKK CALIF ECIECK CC f55.730.42 POWER 125691 SC CAL GAS CC $6.831.65 NATURAL GAS 125692 SPLCIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC 5502.61 PLUMBING SUPPLIES ITT 125693 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO $290.87 ELECTRIC PARTS X 124694 SPEC TECH INC $190.39 MELDING SUPPLIES = 125655 SPIN 1KELSTRIES INC 5989.68 LAB SUPPLIES 1256SE STFRLINC ART $01.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES 125697 SUPNIT STEEL f2.505.52 METAL -1 125G9B SUNSET FORD f135.35 TRUCE PARTS 125699 I P F I C $250.00 PUBLICATION n 1247C0 /AVLCR-DUNK VFG COP'GANI f303.19 TRUCE PARTS 1 TPE 7AILCR SANC CC 1127.31 SAND 247,;1 CH POLEF f825.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 125703 TFLE-CELL. INC 153.95 TELEPHONE PARTS 12.T05 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 520.53 HARDWARE 12570E THGFPSOK FLBLISMING GRCUF 1206.09 PUBLICATION 12570E TCKY.S LICK 8 SAFE SERVICE $36.31 INSTRUMENT PART 12570 TRAVEL IFAVEL 23.571.90 TRAVEL SERVICES 12.7G8 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY INC $877.55 TRUCK PARTS 125709 JG TUCKER L SON INC 5397.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS 125710 TUSTIN DODGE SSR.02 TRUCK PARTS 125711 TWINING LABORATCRIES OF 95,320.59 SOIL TESTING 125712 URIIEO PARCEL SERVICE f150.31 PARCEL SERVICES 125713 UK RE[ STATES ELEVAICR LOOP f6R6.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 125714 VWP SCIENTIFIC 56.790.2P LAB SUPPLIES 125715 VAL1N CORPORATION 62T9.65 FILTER 12571E VALLEY CITIES SVFFLY CO 58.627.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 125717 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTNUPEKTS 119.914.17 LAB SUPPLIES 125718 WESTERN STATES CFERICAL SUPT'LY $34.299.61 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-8-90 125719 WESTIN ENGINEERING 1655.01. ENGINEERING SERVICES 125120 WESTNUX INTERNATIONAL 157.88 TRUCK PARTS 125721 WESCC $653.63 ELECTRIC PARTS 124722 WHITNEY PACNINERV INC f111.96 TRUCK PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9103/97 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAIR 05/.9/92 POSTING 061E P9/69/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 12472! RGURKE L LOOCPUFF L CA S68.256.36 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92 124724 PEADY CCFF $8.888.12 COPIER LEASES 124725 GECRGE YARDLEY CC 1256.98 LAB SUPPLIES 124726 ZIEBARTN S ALPER/C.S. ALPER 902.254.G0 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 --------------- TCTAL CLAIMS PAIC 09/09/92 S3.694.e71.32 SUMNARY AMOUNT X1 OPER FUND $65.28 XI CAP FAC FUND $510.00 fTl X2 OPER FUND $2,892.39 X 02 CAP FAC FUND $6,600.00 S X3 OPOR FUND $24,854.35 03 CAP FAC FUND $3,500.00 trJ X! OPER FUND $1,294.26 05 CAP FAC FUND $56,624.00 X6 OPER FUND $26.94 y 47 OPER FUND $3,790.43 I X7 CAP FAC FUND $03,566.30 CT X11 OPER FUND $6,963.94 X14 CAP FAC FUND $8,425.66 X667 OPER FUND $2,638.41 X7B14 OPER FUND $27.10 JT OPER FUND 4622,250.11 CORD $2,264,469.54 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $491,759.53 JT WORKING CAPITAL $113,813.08 --------------- $3,694,071.32 d a - FUND NO 919LJ - JT DIST YCRxINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/IN/92 PAGE 1 PEPORT NUMBER AF43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/23/92 POSTING DATE 09,13/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 126746 AS IECP COMPANY 5119.867.6U RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 124747 ACAC f131.00 PUBLICATION 1247 T9 AS ANALYSIS f1.040.07 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS 124709 p 6 I f1.172.61 LONG DISTANCE REN THL6PH0N8 BERVIC63 124751 ACTION RENTALS E f1s185.00 AIR DUCT RENTAL 120751 AIR DOLT CLEANING s000.o& AIR DUCT CLBANINC 124152 AIRALL COLA SUPPLY INC 1128.91 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS 124754 ALL/EL SIFFLI CC S1.$52.65 VALVE 124755 pYiT Cx 152.6E INSTRUMENTASUPPLIES PARTS 124756 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC RI UTIONAI$ $634.75 LAB 9UPPLI83 124757 ANIAIEX DISTRIBUTION .331.83 COMPUTER PARTS 124750 A•PI LS 007CRIE $1$231.31 N0TICE8 6 A08 12479E ARC IAE CSERVICES $239.0. LAB SERVICES 12470 ARATET SERVICES INC 3/00.50 UNIFORM RENTALS 124761 ASS TECHNOLOGIES far 000.00 DATA PROCESSING TR SERVICES 124761 DENTAL AOMINIS. t CONSULTANTS 990.00 COBRA ADMINISTRATION CON UFEES LTA fTl 124763 DENTAL INS UpAACE CONSULT, 350.00 DENTAL INSURANCE CONSULTANTS X 124164 AVSA f350.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION S 120764 ACIC DSPCPUST AL SUPPLY CC fl$479.13 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT 124766 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC .117.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES b0 124766 BNN LANDFILL $1.253.13 SAFETYRESIDUALSSUPPLIES REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 124161 BAY SAFETY t SUPPLY f1.253.13 SAFETY SUPPLI88 124769 1,BANANA PLLEPRINI lS.770.00 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES I 124769 0 TEREF AN 3600.65 BATTERIES COMP DISTRIBUTION I 124771 BATTERY DIAGNOSTICS 3110.65 LATT8RI89 1'•' 124712 BAIEPR DIAGN OSIICS INC 17.121.21 LAB ENGINEERING 124773 BCOCAI BETA YILI UN FRCSI f10.618.11 SECURITY VIRVICE9 5-33 124773 BELL SECLP i7Y - S960.49 SECURITY IERVIC68 124775 BIC SAFETY $100.53 LAB SUPPLIES 124776 BCEFAINGEF MAENMCIN $424.66 LAB 9UPPLI83 124777 BUDGET -FIEDLERJANITORIAL 1 ASSOC IN .650.60 LAB SUPPLIJANITORIAL 124778 BUDGET JANITORIAL 31 r 134.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES 12477E BUILT ER rS EMPOA TUN 594.33 HARDWPETTY CASH 124779 BABY G SiAE[D $3.594.33 PETTY CASH RBIMBUR86M6NT 124780 CCfp 9595A0 LAB SUPPLIES 1207 C N 1 1116.50 ELECTRICTRIC R REPAIRS 124/8282 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS. INC $9.152.73 HAIWENAINSTRUMENT AGREEMENT 124783 CS ETRCK S f99242.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124765 LAPIFTPLA SYSTEMS 3292.03 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1241E5 CAL•FAL INC NICAL f.E INC 1197.30 CHEMICALS 1248 CALTROL INC f333.30 INSTRUETNNT SUPPLI69 12478 7 JOHN P [AALIC CC PSI 919r475.4L OCEAN MONITORING M.0.11-14-90 124769 CALIFCPNll ALTL CCLLIEI OA 1M[ f1r639.1tl TRUCE PARTS 124796 CALIFCPNIA SUFRESSIC ESIC 9589.03 SERVICE AGREEMENT / 124756 CAST -RU AlI SUF RE SSICN SYSTEM f599.03 SERVICE AGREEMENT 124191 CAST •PUSCO fL 391.B3 86CURITY SUPPLI69 FORD NC 9199 - JT DIST L(PPIRE CAPITAL PROCESSING DOTE 9/IA/92 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/23/92 POSTING DATE 09/23/92 WARRANT NC. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124792 CE hIURY SAFETY INST L SUPP 52.791.67 SAFETY SUPPLIES 124793 CITY OFFICE FURNITURE INC $1.398.98 OFFICE FURNITURE 124794 COLICM AID SCNS 11.753H98.90 CONSTRUCTION I-9 124795 CCMPLACC S2.191.94 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 12096 COMPLIER BAY $142.23 LAB SUPPLIES 124797 EDhPVTER PRODUCTS PLUS 9166.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124796 COMPUSA. INC. $712.13 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE 124799 COEPCSERVE 321.78 COMPUTER SERVICES 124R00 COAS(LICPTEC ELECTRICAL LIST 95.153.12 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 124SL1 CChTIREKTAL AIR TOCLS INC $183.24 TOOLS 124802 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $4.648.75 CHLORINE M.O.9-9-91 124803 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $3.153.26 ENGINEERING SGOVICES 124804 COSTA MESA AUTC StPPLV 3973.36 TRUCK PARTS 124R05 CCSTPR 599.02 LAB SUPPLIES 1246Ct CCUNIV LHCLEEALE ELECTRIC 1576.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 124867 CPLMICAL FROCESSCRS AND/OR $1.943.70 CHEMICALS 124808 CUNTIN MATHCSON SCIENTIFIC $219.21 LAB SUPPLIES ITT X 124809 CA UEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES $3.45t.30 LAB CERTIFICATION FEES = 124010 STATE WATER RESOLPCES CONIRCL S42.95 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS FEES - PLT 1 124011 STATE WATER RESCLRCCS CORIPCL $32.79 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS FEES - PLT 2 w 129812 CAhIELS 71PE SERVICE $038.77 TIRES 124813 DE AK2A CPRPCRATIOA 1150.V0 EQUIPMENT RENTALS 124814 DE Ah2A SAYSIDE VILLAGE 13,199.87 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 124815 DIFTEC ENVIRONMENTAL 11.830.57 CHEMICALS I 124EI6 CIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES S62.93 PRINTING IV 124811 DIGIIAL EGLIf VEAL CORP $673.46 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 124818 UIONEN CCPP• 17,504.88 SERVICE AGREEMENT 124619 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $1,040.03 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 129P20 DRENELPROC■ EKGR $609.67 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124821 DURN ECORCE CCRF $2.149.10 PAINT SUPPLIES 124822 FIL INSIFLM[K1S INC 346.79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124823 EPA SERVICES IhC $9.989.99 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-44 12R829 EASTMAN INC 33.769.3t OFFICE SUPPLIES 124825 ENCHANTER INC $3.920.GP. OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91 124826 ENVIPCNPERIAL RCSCIIACE ASSCC $646.50 LAB SERVICES 128827 FMM COPIER FFCCtCTS 1539.9E PRINTING SUPPLIES 129B2B PST $ARC ARC ERAVEI IRC 1478.60 ROAD BASE 124029 P.ARSFALL FAIRR[S 3128.06 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 124830 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 37.207.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 124831 JCHN B 6ALMEhSIEIK Ft 33.400.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16 129832 FECEHAL EIPRESS COPE $726.51 AIR FREIGHT 124833 FISCHCR 1 PONTE.R CO 15.957.88 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 229034 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. 5335.9E CONCRETE CUTTING 124835 FLO-SYS1[PS 52.913.3t' PUMP PARTS 124836 FCRFA SCIENTIFIC. INC. $171.37 LAB SUPPLIES 224031 FCUNIGIN VALLEY CAMERA $11.50 FILM a FUND NC %99 - JT DIST WERMINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/10/92 $AGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCLh7Y SAN17A77Ch DISTRICTS OF CRANCE COUNTY CLAIMS PAIL G9/23/92 POSTING DATE 09/23/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124838 FCURTe1h VALLEY FAINT 31,386.00 PAINT SUPPLIES 124E39 FCA 1NDUS7RlAL SALES 51.346.3. TOOLS 124840 THE FOMBORG CO 5496.27 INSTRUMENT 124841 JCRDAK CORTROLS. INC. $1.100.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS 324842 FREECOM IMAGING 1151.0E SERVICE AGREEMENT 124843 PUC FRET 521.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 124944 CITY OF FULLCRTCN $119.91 WATER USE 124845 SA14AHL LUMBER CO SA5.65 HARDWARE/LUMBER 124846 GENERAL ELECTRIC SLPPLY CC. $1.II4.P5 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 124847 GENERAL IELEFHCNE CC $933.67 TELEPHONE SERVICES 12964E GIERLICP-PITQELL IPC s9.027.3C NECHANICAL PARTS 120849 GOOUWAY TOOLS COPP. 11,63 A.82 SLECTRIC PARTS 124850 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $174.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124RE1 GRAPHIC OISIRIBUTCRS f226.2P PHOTO SUPPLIES 1241'.2 CCR CREEP S ASSOCIATES $23.500.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-I1-92 124853 hP 7TFE L EPAFPICS S14.28 PRINTING m 12054 NA14BCUR EAGINEERING $11.695.00 PUMP PARTS X 124655 FRED A HARPER $1.500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 2 1248`6 HARRINGTON INOUSTRIAL FEAST? 5975.20 GAUGE �. 124857 hATCP L MIRK INC $219.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124850 PL PAWN CO INC $116.37 FILTER —I 124859 HELPMATES TEMPORARY SERVICES 3980.38 TEMPORARY SERVICES 124860 HEWLETT PACKARD 5690.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT w 124R61 HE6LETT FACKAPD CPPPAMV 1490.27 LAB SUPPLIES W 1248f2 HI STeNCARC ALIOMITIVE 16.421.45 TRUCK PARTS 124863 J.7. HORVATH S ASSOC. 12Y100.WC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 124869 RS HUGHES CO INC $971.63 SAFETY SUPPLIES 124065 HURTINGTOR REACH RUPREP STA 39.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124666 HLNTIRGTCh SLPPLV 946.22 HARDWARE 124961 IPPERIAL WEST ChEMICAL 501,473.62 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-14-90 124868 INDUSTRIAL THREADED FRODUCTS $1,340.72 CONNECTORS JERSEY INGRAP PAPER 15.939.E-u JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124878 INTERFOUNIAIN SCIENTIFIC CCRP 9427.69 LAB SUPPLIES 124671 PACTEL lEIETRAC 5351.81 COMPUTER SYSTEM RENTAL 124872 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1.292.99 BATTERIES 124873 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $72.14 WATER USE 124074 JLA CRECII CCRF $145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 125875 GREAT 6EEIERN SANIIAhY SLFF 52.082.1P. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 124876 JAY-S C47ERIKG 1160.0G DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES 124877 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO 1104.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124878 JIM.S SUSPENSION SERVICE S2S.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 12409 JP JEPNSOh CENERAL CCNTR 12.931.UU CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4 12<P.RO JCPAS70NE SLFPLY 53C1.4S ELECTRIC PARTS 124881 JCNES GEYICALS INC 32.C40.76 CHEMICALS 124882 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE C $2.746.43 ELECTRICAL PARTS 124883 MARS. ADVANCED MATERIALS INC 30.998.58 LAB SERVICES FUND KC S195 - J1 DIST WCRKIKC. CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/IF/92 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AF43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 09/23/92 POSTING DATE 09/23/92 WARRANT &C. VENCCP AMOUNT OESCRIPTION 124884 NCEVGN A ASSOCIATES 14.950.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES 124885 KING GEARING INC SI.280.75 MECHANICAL PARTS 124806 ANDY INDLSTk IAL SUFFLIES 9273.12 TOOLS 124887 PARllk N(ACICK SR $2.629.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 124RP8 LAU EFFICES CF PCFEAT L LAVCIC 998.11 LEGAL SERVICES - FLORES V. DALEY 124889 LAYFAR. .(ALS L CYE. LAWYERS $15.005.49 LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER IND. L24690 LLVCO ELECTRIC CO $118.65 TRUCK REPAIRS 124091 KP LIN9STROM IEC $7.199.68 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 1241192 MPS 3150.53 PHOTO SERVICES 124993 PSI PETAL ELPFLY INC 5303.55 METAL 124894 MACOPCO S91D.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT 124895 NANTEK $2.346.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124696 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 548.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124657 M41T - CPLCP ARC $2.923.56 CHLORINATION PARTS 124958 0CR PACRER 31.620.D0 CONSULTING SERVICES 124859 MECHANICAL CNENGV SYSTEM S25.E0 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT 124900 MICROAGC OF CCRRITOS 13.894.99 COMPUTER PARTS TYl 124901 MTPWAY KFC 3 MACHINING $4.985.63 MECHANICAL REPAIRS X 124902 FIRE SAFETY AFPLIAACES CC $3.759.95 SAFETY SUPPLIES ._-. 1245(3 PISSICN AEPASIVE SUFFLIES S942.81 MECHANICAL PARTS b0 124944 MITCPELL INSTRUMENT CO $553.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 124905 NLADEN BUNIICN CONSTRUCTION 3541.066.SU CONSTRUCTION 2-30 124906 MORGAN CRANE CO INC $474.85 TRUCK PARTS to 120907 MCSSY YEAR RDO0 $610.31 LAB SUPPLIES 1 124908 PCTICK IACUSIRIES INC $450.72 MECHANICAL PARTS r 1249CS PCICRCLA PAC 36.000.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 124910 STANCARC REF. MATE. PPOGRAP $432.A0 PUBLICATIONS 124911 NATIONAL RESEARCH COUN-CANADA $655.45 PUBLICATIONS 124912 NU-WEST FABRICATION 9700.57 FILTERS 124933 CCCUPATICA)L VISION SERVICES 4503.25 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY GLASSES 124914 CFFICE FI$ILICK/IKTIRICF FES 930,567.11 OFFICE FURNITURE M.0.6-10-92 124915 OF SYSIEPS CC S12.643.18 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 124916 ORACLE CORPORATION $1.750.06 TRAINING REGISTRATION 124917 ORANGE VALVE 3 FITTING CO. $838.11 FITTINGS 124918 CRANEE CVENFEAC COCP COFFIN $217.30 DOOR REPAIRS 124919 CEtC( SELF-FLACEC PECICAL 1 1100.000.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE 12492U CCUNIY SAKITATICK DISTRICT 114.473.05 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 124921 PACCO SALES $564.76 PAINT SUPPLIES 124922 PACIFIC EAFPGY PESOUPCES S5.000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-45-1 124923 PACO FUPFS $220.69 PUMP PARTS 124524 PACIFIC SAFETY EOUIPFEKT CC 32.000.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES 124925 PACIFIC EELL $46.36 TELEPHONE SERVICES 124926 PACICL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 3241.97 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 124927 FAM WEST 5405.37 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 12g92P PARTS LKLIPITED $1.552.78 TRUCK PARTS 124929 FEAT YGRIICN PAIR 9 CC S3.000.0C AUDITING SERVICES M.O.3-13-91 FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/18/92 PAGE 5 REPORT NUMRER AF43 COUNTY SANITAIICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CDUN TV CLAIRE PAID L9/23/92 POSTING DATE t9/23/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 124930 ROY PENCEREPAFI $469.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION 1249l1 PERKIR-ELPER COFFOPATION $3.065.17 LAB SUPPLIES 124932 PLNMA LUERICATICK INC $579.42 MACHINE SUPPLIES 124933 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $125.683.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 124934 PIONEER BANK 524.555.54 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-34-3 124935 PCLYFLPE INC 114,957.77 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.)-17-91 124936 POWER EIECTRC SCPPLY CC 5361.77 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 124927 FCREP (RACK IAC 5100.69 PUMP PARTS 12493E PRLCISION INDUSTRIES 143.54 HARDWARE 124939 FREMIUM CONNECTING POINT S594.E4 COMPUTER PARTS 124940 THE PROJECT SCLUTIONS CO. 54.960.0C INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 124941 PPS INC 51.721.2E GRAPH SERVICES 124545 STFVE F. RACCE. IRC. $203,040.90 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A-2, 1-16 124943 THE REGISTER $245.7C NOTICES 6 ADS 124944 REISH MARINE STUDILS. INC SGS0.00 OCEAN MONITORING 124945 MCJUNNIN-PEFUBLIC $UFPLT 1640.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 12494E Rich COLCP LAE 582.1E PRINTING ITT 124547 PCC911LL ELECIPIC 525.00 REFUND PLANS 6 SPECS FEES X 124948 RCSEPCUhT 91,529.49 INSTRUMENTS ti 124949 FLGGY RUPP $540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION W 124950 SAFETY-KLEEN CORE $260.10 PARTS CLEANER 1249!1 SAKIA AAA RIVER FLCCO $1.250.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES M.O.8-12-92 124952 SAATA FE IRCUSTRIAL FLASTICS $469.90 PLUMBING BUPPLIEB W 1249!3 CCLC SAPLII 32.925.0E FIRST AID/CPR TRAINING 1 124954 SEA-BIRC ELECTPCRICS IAC 5125.CC LAB SUPPLIES N 124955 SEA COAST UESIGNS 543.05 OFFICE MACHINE 124956 SNUAELUCK SALES $2.909.97 GASKETS 1249!7 SILVERI L LE RCUEF 5221.026.50 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3 1249!6 SLIDE PAIIER 9438.33 SLIDES 124959 SIITh-EPEAV CO $1.014.30 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 I24960 SO COAST AIR QUALITY 140G.00 PERMIT FEES 124961 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $3.500.00 SOURCE TESTS 1249E2 SO CALIF ALLIARCE OF PUBLIC $24.000.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES M.O.0-12-92 1249E3 SCUTFERR CALIF ECTSCK CC $919,905.94 POWER 124564 SC CALIF EEISCR CC $25.000.00 DEPOSIT J-19-1 124965 SC CALIF WATER CO 538.41 WATER USE 124466 WESTALLOV INC 591.61 WIRE/CABLE 124967 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS IRC 2516.83 HARDWARE 124968 SPPIAGEA-LERLAG 1756.65 PUBLICATIONS 124969 STAPLES $40.54 OFFICE FURNITURE 124976 STERLING ART 1151.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 124971 SUNSET FORD $44.04 TRUCK PARTS 124972 SUF'ELCO INC 9590.68 LAB SUPPLIES 124973 TCh ASSCCIATES 5995.69 LAB SUPPLIES 124974 TENCRAIILICS 32.J82.05 MECHANICAL PARTS 124975 IELALIOCPIFh CCFFCRAIIGA $119.16 FAX MACHINE REPAIRS FUND NC glgq • JI DIST NCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/I0/92 PAGE E REPORT NUMBER AP43 CCLRTY SANITAIICR DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COUNTY CLAIMS FAID 05/23/92 POSTING DATE C9/23/92 YARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 12491E THCPFSOK IRCLSTPIAL SUPPLY $269.15 MECHANICAL PARTS - 124977 ICKY.S LOCK L SAFE SERVICE 52.357.36 KEYS 6 LOCKS 124978 TRAVEL TRAVEL 1260.00 TRAVEL SERVICES 124979 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY INC 545.29 TRUCK PARTS 124900 UNOCAL $46.10 UNLEADED GASOLINE 124961 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $125.56 PARCEL SERVICES 124982 VLP SCIEA11FIC $3.143.43 LAB SUPPLIES 12490 VALIR CCRPORATION 5589.93 ELECTRIC PARTS 124904 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CD $2.935.25 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 124985 VERTEX SYSTEMS $8.850.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT 124586 VILLAGE KLRSERIES S829.73 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES 1249E7 NEATEER AAC VIAD INSIRUMERT 5597.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES 1249E8 LESTERK STATES CFFPICAL SLFFLY 97,974.06 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.9-8-90 124969 VESCC $1.220.72 ELECTRIC PARTS 124990 NHESSOE VAREC 915.454.91 STEEL 124991 MATEO SCIENTIFIC 1905.1U LAB SUPPLIES 124952 XEROX CCFP 12.278.50 COPIER LEASES Ill 124993 GECREE VARCLEY CC $286.62 PUMP PARTS X 114554 PICHARD E ECGXP 1200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION ............. to TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09/23/92 •$4.607,861.26 lb C1 SUMMARY AMOUNT 11 OPER FUND $242.30 41 CAP FAC FUND $43,374.19 42 OPER FUND $3,773.23 02 CAP FAC FUND $552,985.27 43 OPER FOND $35,756.81 G5 OPER FUND $4,442.59 25 CAP PAC FUND $256,750.44 86 OPER FUND $182.39 07 OPEN FUND $2,072.09 47 CAP FAC FUND $27,705.16 011 OPER FUND $880.86 013 OPER FUND $37.80 K14 OPER FUND $30.94 014 CAP FAC FUND $164,826.79 0566 OPER FUND $3,570.20 0566 CAP FAC FUND $1,140.31 87614 OPER FUND $6,250.93 JT OPER FUND $1,367,972.96 CORP $1,877,141.52 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $119,701.16 JR RKING CAPITAL $139,015.32-- - - =607,861_26 RE: AGENDA ITEM N0. 14 Y0 BRINDERSON CORPORATION November 16, 1992 1� F.rt.i -S w959 SLN 0343 Pa a 19a19 imna Cdh1IXM1a 9P15 (714)752-51M•FM(714)I 11F CORPORATE NEn00l1NRtERS Orange County Sanitation District No. 1 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CA 92728 Attention: Mr. Wayne Sylvester Reference: Central Power Generation Systems at Treatment Plant No. 2 Huntington Beach, California Job No. 1-19-2 Subject: Proposed Settlement Agreement between Brinderson, Cooper & Districts Gentlemen: Section 38 of the above referenced agreement calls for a $2,000,000 letter of credit or other securities in a form approved by the District. Brinderson proposes to provide the following in lieu of the letter of credit. 1. Brinderson agrees that upon execution of this Agreement and approval of Change Order Nos. 15 and 16 by the Board of Directors of District, all sums due and owing Brinderson for accepted and completed work, approximately $600,000, pursuant to the contract and all Change Orders, together with the $500,000 retention, for a total of $1,100,000, shall be held by the District until the final determination and allocation of financial responsibility, as provided for in the Settlement Agreement, is agreed to or ordered by the Arbitrator. 2. Brinderson will advance the full cost and expense, in the estimated amount of $1,218,181, for the Auxiliary Engine System Recovery Work until the final determination and allocation of financial responsibility, as provided for in the Settlement Agreement and ordered by the Arbitrator. National Constructors Orange County Sanitation District No. I Mr. Wayne Sylvester November 16, 1992 Page 2 3. Brinderson's Payment& Performance Bond, in the amount of$21,426,998, with the Aetna shall remain in full force for the completion and final acceptance of the ]-19-2 contract. 4. Our insurance companies have been notified of the Settlement Agreement and have agreed to support Brinderson legally and financially through the completion and final acceptance of the project. In closing I want to add that Brinderson has been in business for over 25 years. Brinderson has never walked away from a project, no matter how severe or costly the dispute. Brinderson is absolutely committed to see this project to the successful completion and acceptance by the District. Very truly yours, BRINDERSON CORPORATION Ron Smith Vice President RS/jik COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ,w'"""- - / W GRANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIR November 18, 1992 1O EWSAKM n.n KX Ein WYMYN V1LLtY.G41WIM�YiTA117) STAFF REPORT CENTRAL POWER GENERATOR SYSTEM AT PLANT NO, I JOB NO, 1-19-1 After Advanced Engines Technology Corporation (AETC) investigated Treatment Plant No. 2 Central Generation facilities, staff issued a purchase order, within staff authority, to AETC to review the work at the Central Generation facilities at Plant No. 1. Preliminary work by AETC indicates that there are also problems at Reclamation Plant No. 1, including the following: • Contamination of the on-engine piping for fuel, water and air. • Lube oil leaks around the turbo-charger oil seal. • The same lube oil and air filter problem identified at Plant No. 2. • Excessive water scale in the engines. • Poor on-engine pipe welding. The engines have not yet been started at Plant No. 1 (nor filled with oil or water.) We have notified Cooper of these problems; however, we have not yet received a satisfactory response. Separately, as the Directors are aware, the lubricating oil piping is proposed to be reconfigured to a Cooper standard. The lube oil piping at Plant No. 1 was designed and configured in the same manner as Plant No. 2. The reconfiguration is nearly done at Plant No. 1 by the Contractor, Hunter, on a time and material basis at a cost of about $200,000. In addition to the lube oil reconfiguration, an unknown quantity of work will have to be performed on the engines prior to start-up. Whether or not Cooper does the work; and whether or not Hunter, or others are asked to do it, job delays have and will occur. The delay costs may approach $100,000. The clean up may add another $100,000. Finally, Directors are aware that the original Purchase Agreement with Cooper provided that Cooper supply installation, start-up, and inspection supervision. Since that was not satisfactory at Plant No. 2, staff believes that these services could best be supplied by AETC at Plant No. 1. Accordingly, staff is requesting that the Directors authorize AETC to provide start- up/inspection services and authorize the General Manager to issue a change order to the purchase order previously issued to AETC, increasing the amount from $25,000 to $166,000. TMD:jac ENG\3710U-19-1.SR1 ' /�/'� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS .���./�,�y}� & ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA November 18, 1992 A+^"'^^7 00.T e,z7 FOUNTAIN VALLEY.UAUFOANA 92728 SIF7 STAFF REPORT 'nuleszz<„ CENTRAL POWER GENERATOR SYSTEM AT PLANT NO, 1 JOB NO, J-19-1 After Advanced Engines Technology Corporation (AETC) investigated Treatment Plant No. 2 Central Generation facilities, staff issued a purchase order, within staff authority, to AETC to review the work at the Central Generation facilities at Plant No. 1. Preliminary work by AETC indicates that there are also problems at Reclamation Plant No. 1, including the following: • Contamination of the on-engine piping for fuel, water and air. • Lube oil leaks around the turbo-charger oil seal. • The same lube oil and air filter problem identified at Plant No. 2. • Excessive water scale in the engines. • Poor on-engine pipe welding. The engines have not yet been started at Plant No. 1 (nor filled with oil or water.) We have notified Cooper of these problems; however, we have not yet received a satisfactory response. Separately, as the Directors are aware, the lubricating oil piping is proposed to be reconfigured to a Cooper standard. The lube oil piping at Plant No. 1 was designed and configured in the same manner as Plant No. 2. The reconfiguration is nearly done at Plant No. 1 by the Contractor, Hunter, on a time and material basis at a cost of about $200,000. In addition to the lube oil reconfiguration, an unknown quantity of work will have to be performed on the engines prior to start-up. Whether or not Cooper does the work; and whether or not Hunter, or others are asked to do it, job delays have and will occur. The delay costs may approach $100,000. The clean up may add another $100,000. Finally, Directors are aware that the original Purchase Agreement with Cooper provided that Cooper supply installation, start-up, and inspection supervision. Since that was not satisfactory at Plant No. 2, staff believes that these services could best be supplied by AETC at Plant No. 1. Accordingly, staff is requesting that the Directors authorize AETC to provide start- up/inspection services and authorize the General Manager to issue a change order to the purchase order previously issued to AETC, increasing the amount from $25,000 to $166,000. TMD:jac ENG\3710U-19-1.SRI f REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN NOVEMBER 17. 1992 1 ) PRESENTATION OF PRIDE SUGGESTION AWARDS AT ITS LAST MEETING , THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE APPROVED 15 PRIDE COST SAVING OR SAFETY SUGGESTION AWARDS TO EMPLOYEES , TOTALING $9, 123 . 00. THE PRIDE PROPOSALS ARE ESTIMATED TO SAVE APPROXIMATELY $190, 000. TONIGHT WE WOULD LIKE TO RECOGNIZE THREE OF THE EMPLOYEES WHO RECEIVED THE MAXIMUM $1500 FOR THEIR SUGGESTION. I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THEIR DEPARTMENT HEAD, BOB OOTEN , TO INTRODUCE EACH OF THE EMPLOYEES AND GIVE A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THEIR SUGGESTIONS . A. JOHN KAVOKLIS: PRIDE NO. 178 - DISTRIBUTION OF FILTRATE SOLIDS. B . DAVID HEINZ: PRIDE NO. 215 - ACTIVATED SLUDGE PLANT POWER REDUCTION . C. JEFFREY REED: PRIDE NO. 252 - ELLIS PUMP STATION OPERATION REDUCTION. -ITEM 2 ON NEXT PAGE- r 2) PRESENTATION OF 35 YEAR SERVICE AWARD TO GREGG PAMSON GREGG PAMSON STARTED WITH THE DISTRICTS 35 YEARS AGO " IN THE LABORATORY. OVER THE YEARS HE WORKED HIMSELF UP TO HEAD THE LABORATORY. GREGG NOW DEVOTES HIS TIME TO OPERATIONAL RESEARCH . HE BRINGS A SENSE OF PRAGMATISM TO HIS RESEARCH AND OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES, AND HELPS EVERYONE ELSE KEEP THEIR FEET FIRMLY PLANTED ON THE GROUND . OVER THE YEARS HIS EFFORTS HAVE CONTRIBUTED SIGNIFICANTLY TO IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY OF OUR OPERATIONS. -ITEM 3 ON NEXT PAGE- `.) 3) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS OF APPRECIATION FOR RETIRING DIRECTORS .. AS YOU KNOW , BECAUSE OF THE RECENT ELECTION AND COUNCIL REORGANIZATIONS , SEVERAL OF OUR DIRECTORS ARE RETIRING FROM THE BOARDS . I WOULD THEREFORE LIKE TO INTRODUCE FOR THE BOARDS' CONSIDERATION , ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS EXPRESSING APPRECIATION TO THOSE DIRECTORS AND RECOGNIZING THEIR OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS TO OUR WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM . RESOLUTION NO. DIRECTOR'S NAME CITY DISTRICTS) 92-154 NORMAN CULVER GARDEN GROVE 3 ... SANITARY DIST . 92-168 DAN GRISET SANTA ANA 1 92-169 PAT MCGUIGAN SANTA ANA 3 92-170 BOB MAIN GARDEN GROVE 2 SANITARY DIST . 92-171 ARTHUR NEWTON PLACENTIA 2 92-172 RUTHELYN PLUMMER NEWPORT BEACH 6 92-173 SALLY ANNE SHERIDAN IRVINE 14 WE WILL HAVE PLAQUES PREPARED AND ASK EACH OF THEM TO RETURN AT A FUTURE MEETING FOR A FORMAL PRESENTATION (WITH THE EXCEPTION OF A SPECIAL PRESENTATION TO NORM CULVER TONIGHT - SEE NEXT ITEM) . -ITEM 4 ON NEXT PAGE- 4) PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE AND RESOLUTION TO RETIRING DIRECTOR NORM CULVER WE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A SPECIAL PRESENTATION TO RECOGNIZE NORM CULVER TONIGHT NORM IS OUR RECORD HOLDER . HE IS RETIRING AFTER 30 YEARS OF SERVICE ON THE SANITATION DISTRICTS' BOARD OF DIRECTORS . NORM IS A PAST JOINT CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT NO . 3 CHAIRMAN , AND HAS BEEN THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE EVER SINCE ITS INCEPTION. (PRESENT RESOLUTION AND PLAQUE TO NORM) (GENERAL MANAGER HAS A STAFF MEMENTO TO PRESENT TO NORM) BEST OF ALL, WE'VE PREPARED A SPECIAL CAKE FOR NORM THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT TO HIM , AND WE HAVE A PIECE OF CAKE FOR EVERYONE ELSE TO ENJOY AS WELL . 5) PRESENTATION OF DISTRICTS' PINS TO NEW DIRECTORS PRESENT PINS TO NEW DIRECTORS (IF ANY ARE IN ATTENDANCE) "' -ITEM 6 ON NEXT PAGE- 6) UPCOMING MEETINGS A. AD HOC COMMITTEE RE SERVICE TO OUTSIDE AREAS - �. THE AD HOC COMMITTEE RE SERVICE TO OUTSIDE AREAS IS SCHEDULED TO MEET TOMORROW , THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 19TH , AT 4:30 P. M. B . FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE IS ALSO SCHEDULED TO MEET TOMORROW , THURSDAY , NOVEMBER 19TH, AT 5:30 P . M. C . JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE (JOINT CHAIRMAN AND VICE JOINT CHAIRMAN ONLY) - THE JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30TH AT 8:00 A . M . 7) PASSING OF FORMER BOARD MEMBER, JACK KELLY (YOU MAY WISH TO COMMENT ON JACK KELLY'S PASSING AND ADJOURN TONIGHT'S MEETING IN HONOR AND MEMORY OF HIM . ) -END OF REPORT- MEERNO DATE NOTdIBL 18A 1992 TIME 7:30 P.H. ENSTFUM 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 L 14 DISTRICTT JOINT BOARDS (MI RDSOM . 91YGGf . . . . . MEYER) ... .... ... . . .. .BARBERA.... MEYER) . . . . . SARRERA. . .. MRSYI... ............G)lEl .. ... (PONROUS) . . . SALTAREI) . .L (Scam ...............fAlEY ....JL —_ (ROTM . . . . . . STAMCN . . .. (0.U)AIE14 .............CGt. ... ...� nRRYMM9. . . WA4mm ...... MAW) . ...............cam ....y — DISTRICT 2 (BELL) . ...............BBB.V .....y — M=WsOIR . . WTDM ..... .e MEL" ..... .........l14EAP _ (SCOTR . . . . . COLLMS ....� (RACE) . ...............EEA1S4 ..... _ MEYER) . . . . . BARREIM....JG ( MCHEIT.............FSpM ..... . — MORBY) . . . . . CAT . . .. .L (AkONNE)..............WW1.. ..... — MEW . . . . . . DENES . . ... .0 _— (RXHAROSW4.. . ....... .iIIEEF.. ... _ _ AORA) . . . YAN L (WEDAA) . . . . . . .. ......YWBIgI (Cam) . . . . 1)YlN (PLUIWAEM . . .I. ... MART , .... . _ (PA ER) . . . . NEL90N. .. ... (MES) . . . . . NEWTON . ...g (MRSYTIE) . . . ... .... .,IA830..... MUNTER) . . . . (0.0PA) iBRNGi7 . . .. . PUlR1O . ....AG (CULVER) . . . . ..'�lAN44R — (ROTM . . . .. . 4TAMION. ...JL (WWROM4... ........ SMBYIIWI OISf7DCT3 MERW"..............MINER J/ (PARKER ..............ID33ON .... ✓ MOTSOM .... 3V ... (TYNE9) ....... ....... — MEISOM .... BMBlBS...... _ — (DDILLAFl ............ ..PARNER . .. .JG — MDRBV) ..... (AGE) . . . ........... . .PARISI . . .... _ (Scam (HUNtM ..... BAAIR . ..... AVER. .... . O"T)....... (RDE . ..... EVA4 ..... . (PUCXD ............ .....PPPOWEUNBI1BE0IRE1 R8...... . MAIiEY flA. . . ... MATAREY . — _ •........... MARINE) . .. . BNfi41. . .. .J/ IBIBBIE�irx) .............. (MRSYTHE) . . . ARrO . . . . . (PIAIOO) ............ ..RCMMWON _ RBWARoaR4 M61MBM1 . . . (STANiOM . ........... .B-T -he _ MERYM4 . . . . MMEA. . . . . . ✓ PN x) . .9. ..... ....... .9ALTARELLI . . _ NUNKGE) . . . . . . PARTM . . . ICOAI . . ............ . •W114lIIE _ MNNTEM . . . . PIORER . . .. PWSON)............ . .WIER . . . . . MOBRAM1LE) . . SILVA . . . . . . R W ONO). ...... .. . . . .811BISB1E0 . . . — (ROT) . . . . . . STANTOH . . . . (ROBRAEEE)..... . ... . . (BALES) . . . . MW . . . . . (ROTM . ...... . . . . . . . ONTTRICTB (WUEA). ...... . . . . . . . .9WAN. . . .. . — �/ MART) . . . . . . PLUMYFR. . . .JL (BATES) . .. . . . . . . . . . .. (WlR . . . . . . . KWMEB. . . .JG (FEHRYYMESXERRICIfINEAOE) .WAHNEIi . .. . — (SiANTQQ. . . . RQM . . . . . . ✓ (OULLStSOM . . . . . . . . . . . . DISTRICT WaTO ATTEFA O B . . . . .W MC . . . .— (9HERRIdR . . . WAHNER . . . ._ /` _ TLUMYER) . . . HART . . . . . . I a4AFE OTNEB (STANTOM. . . . ROM . . . . . .of SYLVESTER. . . . . . ✓ WOOORUPP ..-Age DISTRICT? B�VIN .. . • .. • • — ANWM .. ...— ANDETISCN. . ... . M&TARELO . . PNE . . . . E ) . . . . . WR . . HCUA9WEN.SS O.TN..AB................ MEYER . . . BARRERA. . BoRwYG....... (PLWMce4 . . . . . . . . . . ( W) . . . . . RO SON . 1HHHR1O0pHM 11B00 10.19..1.................... . (STANTOM. . . . RM . .. . . . KNOPF ...... —_ JC M1bYAOND) . . . i11e1mR1 . . . NN R . ...... . JG lFE . . .....JC CT 71 NELLOR . . .. .. (WnT . . lIND4fR011 ..— MDDLTM NELSON. . .... . . PATTERSOM . . WMCHELL . . .�� MCHOl3 . .. .. . . SHAW. ....._ STONE ..... JG (ROM . . . . . . 9TANTON . . . ... RENESO.... . . . — WASON.... . SUPSO �— SSAPSON ..... . . JG YOUNG .. . . . SMEED. ..... . MWAA) . . . . . GLUAMW.._je . ... (BEYER . . . . . RARREP4. . . .. . . . D . . . . .... ... e MUWM . . . . N E ......e SANTOM. . . . RM . .....,. R ..+�- • - _ MILLER) . . . . . SWAN ...... Ryi{N`v' ai�i�0t' MEYER(PWETI) . . . . PONTENI4 .. . (9EY . . . . . / (STANTON). . . . `►" OWA).10N0) . . . iyMiYIEM ... -' ''• '� �^M^'••�V5 V V � 43 9E PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 11/18/92 BOARD MEETING NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM Please Print Please Print �o S r .eiivo so.✓ 11/18/92 JOINT BOARD MEETING NOTES R6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman JC: The next item that I have was not in your agenda packet; however, there is a change in directorship on the Garden Grove Sanitary District. George L. Zlaket has been appointed to the District No. 2 position. I would like to have a motion this evening to approve that. Director Culver then introduced Mr. Zlaket and Joint Chairman Mahoney welcomed him to the Boards. We have a PRIDE program where employees can make suggestions. If in fact there is a savings to the District, we share that savings with them up to $1,500.00 depending upon the savings to the District. I am proud to tell you there were fifteen PRIDE suggestions and awards that were made at the last Fiscal Policy Committee. We have all of those employees who get the maximum amount of $1,500.00 come before the Boards of Directors. We recognize and thank them for their contribution to the Districts and at that time I have the privelege of awarding them with their checks. I will ask that the department head, Bob Ooten if he will come forward this evening and introduce the three employees from his department who are the recipients of the maximum awards. BO: The first one is John Kavoklis. He recommended modification in our dewatering system to change the way our recycle flow is distributed and increase the capacity of the digesters which saves chemicals and increases digester gas production. This will save an estimated $44,400.00. I recommended that he receive the maximum award of $1,500.00. The second award that I have recommended is Dave Heinz. The secondary system uses alot of energy. Dave has made modifications to reduce horse power in the secondary system by one-fourth or 150 hp. The first year savings is estimated to be $80,000.00 and I recommend that he receive the maximum award of $1,500.00. The third award is Jeff Reed. We have a pump station that brings water to Plant No. 1. -------- Jeff recommended that we turn the pump station off, reduce the energy that the pumps were using, reduce the maintenance operation. For this I recommended the maximum award of $1,500.00. JC: I think that it is always exciting to see what our employees are doing for us out there. No only is it a great thing to give them a little bit of money but basically it makes us look good. I 'd like to tell you that this month the PRIDE awards that we granted our employees had a total of $9,123.00. You just saw 50% of that with three individuals. The total savings to the District was $190,000.00. I would say that one of the best programs we have going is the PRIDE award program. It is now my pleasure to make a presentation to a gentleman who has been with the Sanitation Districts for 35 years. Over the years he worked himself up to head the laboratory. He now devotes his time to operational research. He brings a sense of pragmatism to his research and operational activities. He helps everyone else keep their feet firmly planted on the ground. Over the r.r -1- years his efforts have contributed significantly to improving the effectiveness and efficiency of our operations. I introduce to you Mr. Gregg Pamson with the Districts. Mr. Pamson, please come forward. We have a request for Resolutions of Appreciation for retiring Directors. As you know, some of our Directors were not running again for re-election and as a `�../ result they are retiring. I would like to ask for Resolutions of Appreciation for the following Directors: Norman Culver, Dan Griset, Pat McGuigan, Bob Main, Arthur Newton, Ruthelyn Plummer and Sally Anne Sheridan. We will make presentations probably at the January meeting to all of these Directors except for one. That one individual has been around here for 30 years. We would like to recognize Norm Culver tonight. Norm is our record holder. He has been on the Board of Directors the longest. He has served during his tenure as the Joint Chairman of the Districts. He has also served as the Chairman as District No. 3 and he has been the only Chairman of the Building Committee. I 'm going to present a resolution and then I'm going to ask our VJC to present a plaque to him. Norm, it has been a real pleasure personally to serve with you on the Sanitation Districts for the eight years that I have been here. It has been enjoyable having you here. We wish you the very very best. (He then read the resolution.) The VJC then presented Director Culver with his plaque. JC: We now have a presentation that staff would like to make. JWS: Norm, it just seems like the other day you came on the Board. I don't think within those 30 years Norm has missed but one or two meetings and that was because of Illness. Anytime there was a problem that needed to be addressed, r..i Norm was always willing to step forward and say •count me in°. Norm, on behalf of the staff for your 30 years of support and help, I would like to present two mememtos. (He then presented a rhinestone plunger to Norm Culver.) Director Roth: From both Roger Stanton and I, we wanted to recognize you for outstanding service on both the Orange County Sanitation District and also the Garden Grove Sanitation District. We would like to present you with this pen set. What this is is a collector item. --------- Norm Culver then commented on the earlier days of the Sanitation District, on how there were no chairs for their meetings. He commented on the numerous people that he enjoyed working with. He remembered the big 5-mile extension out into the ocean. JC: We had a special cake made for you. I hope you can all see this - it's a man climbing out of a manhole. We want you to take this cake home with you. We also have cake here for everyone else. While they are passing out the cake, I am going to continue on with a couple of items. I am going to introduce George Zlaket. George, please come up and also Barry Hammond. I would like to welcome you and present each of you with a pin. Wear it with pride. One of the things that we've always said here at the Sanitation District is that if you apply yourself, you get more out of it. We're really glad to �../' have you here. -2- We have a couple of upcoming meetings. We have an Ad Hoc Committee re Service to Outside Areas. This committee will be meeting tomorrow, November 19th, at 4:30 P.M. The Fiscal Policy Committee is also scheduled to meet tomorrow, Thursday, November 19th, at 5:30 P.M. As Director Roth said this evening, our Director, friend and City Councilman of Huntington Beach, Jack Kelly passed away. This evening when we adjourn, we will adjourn it in memory of Jack Kelly. Don, thank you for your comments at the beginning of the meeting. #6(b)- Report of the General Manager JWS: Special thanks to our staff members, Anna Ubaldini and Eunice Kizzlah who baked and decorated those cakes last night on their own time. If you recall , the Boards authorized a reversal of the Series B Certificates of Participation SWAP transaction at the last meeting. That SWAP reversal was effectively accomplished on election day because of alot of activity in the market. I would like Gary Streed to brief you on the outcome of that transaction. GGS: The reversal was effected on election day. Early in the morning (our time) there was favorable movement in the market. Remember, the Directors had -------- of between if we would make less than $6.0 million we should bail out. If we should make $7.0 million we should take the money and run. Early in the morning we were at $6.9. We took a vote and ask is that close enough or not. Overwhelming consensus was that it probably was but we ought to confirm that with a couple of Directors. We did that. In the time that it took us to do that, the reversal rate when we were talking of $6.9 was 3.39. It had gotten by noon to 4.44, a considerable move away from us. That amounts to about a little over a million dollars. Your Financial Manager called up Merrill Lynch and said what was good enough this morning is good enough now and prevailed upon them to give us the rate that was in effect in the morning. We took the money at that time. That deal has been concluded and the total earnings on that in 11h years is $6.9 million. The Fiscal Policy Committee will have the detailed report on that tomorrow night. #6(c) - Report of General Counsel TLW: Just briefly, in your agenda package I have included an annual report on the status of various litigation matters. If any Director does have any questions or comments, I ' ll be happy to comment on them. Hopefully next month I ' ll have for you a similar report relating to pertinent legislation that effects the Districts that came out of a past session of the State Legislature. Towards the end of the agenda, we will be convening in closed session to review three items and those will be addressed at that. -3- R9(d)(e) - Central Power Generation System at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 Director Collins: Mr. Chairman, I move that we pull items 9(d) and 9(e). Staff recommendation is to take item 2 which involves rework and negotiate a rebate with the designer. I would like to move that we approve 9(d) by adding items 3 and 4 to be re-negotiated with the designer. TMD: Mr. Chairman, I know Director Collins is concerned that these change order items that are the result of errors or omissions be fairly treated between the Districts and its designers. We will talk to the designers and do as directed by the Boards of Directors. Director Collins: I would like to move on 9(e) the recommended action except that all items except item M4 be negotiated with the engineer of the designer. TMD: Once again, we will do that. These items were all the result of omissions from the plans and specifications. If there are added costs to these items because they were added by change order rather than included in the original contract price, we will do as directed - seek that recovery. Director Pickler: ?? TMD: The discussions with the designer will have nothing to do with the project. The project will continue forward. Director Griffin: ?? Director Collins: There is no intent at this time to have a report back at this time. TMD: As I understand, the motion as amended. Does not take issue with the fact �./ that the change order need be approved but whether or not there is designer responsibility in the change order. JC: Any opposition to the motion? Seeing none, it will be deemed approved. At this time, I would like to ask if Director Catlin if he would give us a report on the National Water Research Institute (NWRI) of which he serves for the Sanitation Districts. Director Catlin: For those Directors who don't know what the NWRI is, I thought it about time since it has been Iii years for a little bit of briefing to see if our money is going to the right place. As a little bit of background, let's tell what the NWRI is. I think Peer Swan deserves a tremendous amount of credit for encouraging Joan Irvine Smith to get interested in water. She has very generously come forward. We formed this organization. The mission is very clearly stated, "To identify and support research activities that address water supply and water quality needs." To that end, five local agencies got together to form this group. Those agencies formed In 1991 and we are one of them. We are contributing $50,000 a year, in addition to what we do in our normal research. Those organizations are the Orange County Water District because of the water table, ourselves, Municipal Water District of Orange County which really wholesales the water to most of the cities except Fullerton, Santa Ana and Anaheim, the San Joaquin Basin Authority which manages the ground water based in the South Orange County and then the Irvine Ranch Water District which Peer heads up. -4- Here is an organization who has two staff members. We picked out a very knowledgeable person in the water district, Ron Lenski. He and his Secretary really run this organization. What we have done is gathered together some nineteen or twenty-two key water people in the country. These are the best talent you can possibly find in water to advise us on this. We also have an inter-agency committee who reviews the role of this organization to see if we are headed in the right place. We are divided into three types of programs. The research project programs are the ones that we are actively involved in now. What we do is grant money on a matching basis for research along the lines to see what can be done toward water quality. We have cooperative programs and then we have developmental programs. The next slide shows the depth of involvement that we have with the United States. I will tell you; we are really gaining credibility. Senator Paul Simon came all the way out here. He is the head of a very important committee to find out what was going on. Here is an organization that wasn't asking for federal money. That made an impression. This is really making an impression across the country. Here we have nineteen states that are involved in this. Orange County Sanitation District and NWRI is really getting a reputation. What do we do? Let's take a look at where the money goes and how we are getting this thing accomplished. Financially what happens is that the NWRI together with Joan Irvine Smith is putting together approximately $500,000 a year. What we are trying to do is also encourage utilities, the power companies, the people that are interested in water, American Water Research Institute to contribute, universities are doing this, the government is putting a little bit in because they have become interested. They are saying that this is a way to make progress with their money and get great mileage out of it. This is where the 1..01 budget is. Let's take a look at a couple that are being done. We have some tremendous projects and I have visited most of these projects to see what they are doing. They are finding what the quality of water is and we are making great progress on it. Here is one that is being done by one of our participants. Let me read what the technology is and you will probably have as hard of time as I have of understanding it. "The development and application of molecular techniques to detect indicator and pathogenic microorganisms and treated wastewater." Very interesting but when I read the terminology of this it takes real experts to do this. We are monitoring this and I think we are making real progress. The final line that I want to say is there are seven projects that are now in the process of and they are all matching funds. The final thing I would like to say is I hope that you will continue to support this program. We couldn't be doing anything better with our money. We are making a reputation and I think there is a by-product of this thing. For those of you who don't know what a 301(h) waiver is, it is one that is very important to us. What we are building is a reputation and I think the by-product of that is nationally EPA recognizes that this is probably the finest and greatest organization of wastewater in the country. -5- Director Swan: The two people working on the staff are part time not full time and we are running a $4.0 million research program; the lowest overhead structure in the country. M13-Building Committee ..� Director Culver: I would like to invite all of the Directors within the coning year to tour the new laboratory facility. It is beautiful and top graded in technology. Make arrangements to come and take a look; it is well worth your time. JC: I agree; I have been through it as well . It is a fantastic operation. I appreciate your comments and I think the point is well taken. I think you would all be proud of the laboratory. (Director Griffin voted no on 813(b)(3)) p15-Supplemental Agenda JC: I would ask Wayne for a brief report as to what we're doing, why we're doing it and then ask for some action to add it to the agenda and then to take further action. JWS: I would like to direct your attention to item (b). The audit report was reviewed by the Fiscal Policy Committee at their October 21st meeting. It was supposed to have been agendized to receive, file and approve at tonight' s board meeting but it was inadvertently omitted from the listing. It was also suppose to have been mailed last week to you by the auditor, Peat Marwick but that slipped through the crack as well . They did Federal Express copies last night and hopefully you received it today. �.. There is a requirement in our Certificates of Participation indentures that it be approved by the Boards by the end of November. We would therefore urge that you consider doing that tonight. As I said, the Fiscal Policy Committee reviewed it with the auditor at the last meeting. Mr. Steve Sardinia of KPMG Peat Marwick is here tonight if there are any questions or if you would like a brief report from him or the Finance Director, Gary Streed. If the Directors are uncomfortable in accepting the report tonight, you could delay action until December. However, we would have to seek waivers and extensions from the COP trustees, banks, insurers and underwriter. The other action item on the supplemental agenda is (c). At last month's meeting the Boards authorized a refunding of the 1986 COP issue and a portion of the 1991 Series B issue. Bond counsel has since determined that an additional board action is necessary before that transaction can be finalized. I would like to ask Gary Streed to brief you on that. GGS: The resolutions that were approved at the last meeting can be improved upon and that is why we are asking to have this on the agenda tonight. The resolutions we had and the agreement we thought we had for the liquidity provision has been improved upon substantially. We now have an irrevocable letter of credit. It is much better than what we thought we were going to be able to get. The bond counsel has found that we would be in a much better position regarding the tax exempt status of these COP's if this board were to take an action identifying and stating that there will some cost savings involved in going -6- through with this transaction. I don't think that I need to mention to you that we wouldn't be doing it if there weren't some cost savings involved. Today in accordance with the guidelines we received from the Board and the Fiscal Policy Committee we locked in the interest rate on the SWAP at 5.55%, a very favorable interest rate on it (Credit should be given to Patti Gorczyca, the Financial �..i Manager). The results in gross savings to us of $7.0 million, the PV of those would be a little over $4.0 million if we can go through with this. There are indeed some cost benefits to doing this and we would like for you to consider the action tonight that finds that. CLOSED SESSION -7- 10/14/92 - Approve a Mutual Benefit Advances Agreement, sometimes referred to as a "Cross-Collaterilization Agreement", between the participating Districts Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. Authorizing finance team to Moved, seconded and duly carried: , determine and implement the best combination of financing Marna- That the finance team be, and is tives to obtain the most favorable hereby, authorized to determine overall terms and conditions for and implement the best the Refunding Certificates of combination of the debt financing Participation, 1992 Series alternatives to obtain the most favorable overall terms and conditions for the Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series, based on the market conditions during the transaction time frame; and, FURTHER MOVED: That each District Chairman or Chairman pro tem, Board Secretary, General Manager, Director of Finance, General Counsel and any other duly-constituted officer or agent be, and are hereby, authorized to execute any and all documents necessary and advisable to effectuate the transactions. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and a rove written report of the Fiscal Policy That the written report of the Fiscal Committee Policy Committee meeting held on September 28, 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 8 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratifying action of Fiscal Policy ommittee in directing staff to That the action of the Fiscal Policy negotiate a reversal of the Committee in directing staff to existing three-year SWAP relative negotiate a reversal of the existing to the 1990-1992 Ca ital three-year SWAP relative to the Improvement Program, Series B OP 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program, Issue Series B COP Issue, when deemed appropriate by staff and the financing team, subject to the concurrence of the Chairman of the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Joint Chairman, be, and is hereby, ratified. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Changing the regular Noveer 11, 1992 meeting of the Jo mb int Boards to That the regular Joint Board meeting November 18 1992 date of November 11, 1992, be, and is hereby, changed to Wednesday, November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. due to the Veterans' Day holiday. -11- 10/14/92 °Interest Rate SWAP Agreement...................Sets forth terms and conditions of interest between Districts and counterparty • *Liquidity Guarantee Agreement...................Guarantees a liquidity facility at 25 basis points annual fee °Guarantee of American International Group, Inc....Guarantees performance on SWAP agreement *Offering Statement..........Informs potential Investors about the terms and conditions of the financing *Standby Bond Purchase Agreement...................Sets forth the terms and conditions of the liquidity facility *Remarketing Agreement.......Sets forth the duties and responsibility of the remarketing agent �..� - Authorize execution and delivery of synthetic fixed rate advance refunding COPS, subsequent to the negotiation process, with final terms to be determined by finance team, but not to exceed $170 million and a term of 25 years - Authorize underwriter's (PaineWebber) fees not to exceed $3.50/$1,000 certificate for synthetic fixed rate transaction - Authorize selection of State Street Bank and Trust Company as Trustee Bank (estimated gross fee over 21-year life of issue is $70,000.00) - Select KPMG Peat Marwick as verification agent (one-time fee is $3,500.00) - Authorize selection of AMBAC as municipal bond insurer (fee is 27 basis points) - Approve Master Interest Exchange (SWAPs) and approve liquidity facility with American International Group, Inc. -10- } r October 14, 1992 agenda material, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, `o, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is $1,950,061.00. 9(g): AWARD ABANDONMENT OF RED HILL PUMP STATION, PHASE 1, CONTRACT NO. 7-14-1-1. In August, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-14-1-1 which provides for the gravity sewer connection as the first phase necessary for the future abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station in the Tustin Hills. This is part of District No. 7's plan to eliminate and abandon nine pump stations in the area, made possible by the recent construction of the Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer (HATS) by Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) in Peters Canyon Wash, and by the Director's approval of a capacity acquisition/flow accommodation agreement with IRWD in June which allows District No. 7 flows to enter into the IRWD system. Final abandonment (Phase 2) must await completion of certain local tract sewers tributary to HATS by various developers. On September 15, 1992, ten bids were received for said contract. The bids ranged from a high of $137,410.00 to a low bid of $90,732.00, submitted by Silveri 6 Le Bouef JV. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda materials. Staff recommends award to Silveri & Le Bouef JV for their low bid of $90,732.00. The engineer's estimate was $140,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS 11: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF FISCAL POLICY/EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES. The Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee met jointly on September 23, 1992. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on their deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards. 12: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE. The Fiscal Policy Committee met separately on September 28, 1992. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on the Committee's deliberations and its recommended action for consideration by the Boards. 13: CHANGE REGULAR NOVEMBER JOINT BOARD MEETING DATE TO NOVEMBER 18 1992. The regularly scheduled November Joint Board Meeting falls on Veteran's Day, Wednesday, November 11, a legal holiday. It is therefore -10- October 14, 1992 DISTRICT 7 `/ 9(f): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO RELOCATION OF MICHELSON PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-11-2, AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE. Contract No. 7-11-2, Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, provides for construction of a reinforced concrete raw sewage pump station, a sewer force main, and gravity sewers and appurtenances in Michelson Drive and easements from Von Kerman Avenue east to Carlson Avenue, all in the City of Irvine, at a cost of $1.9 million. The contract is now complete. (1) Change Order No. 3 Change Order No. 3 is a net addition of $73,000.00 to the contract with Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. for one item of additional work. This item is the result of additional time being required to construct the sewer line caused by reduced working hours. The contract documents, specifically Section 113-6 of the Detailed Specifications, stated that all construction activities related to a new sewer line in Michelson Drive, City of Irvine, would be limited to weekdays between the hours of 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. The Districts' construction permit was approved by the City with the above authorized work hours. The employee who approved and signed the Districts' plans, including all traffic control plans, subsequently left the employ of the City. After the award of the contract and during the preconstruction meeting, the City of Irvine verbally directed the District's contractor to change the working hours to between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. This extended the job, reduced the hours of productive work per shift, and increased the cost of work. If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this contract will be $122,925.00. This represents an increase of 6.7% over the original contract amount, and includes $34,897.00 (1.95) in added work which will be paid by the Irvine Ranch Water District under Change Order No. 1. Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for an addition of $73,000.00 to the contract with Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change order. (2) Acceptance of Contract as Complete Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. has fulfilled all contractual obligations within the specified time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the -9- • October 14, 1992 appropriate to change the regular meeting date to the following Wednesday, November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. 14: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION. From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards. DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 28: APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 AND AWARD OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BITTER POINT AND ROCKY POINT PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 5-32, AND IMPROVEMENTS TO BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-33. In August, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for Contracts Nos. 5-32 and 5-33 to upgrade and modernize three of our older pump stations in Newport Beach along Pacific Coast Highway. Each pump station will receive major electrical upgrades and some other work, but the Bay Bridge Pump Station, completed in 1966, will receive major mechanical, seismic and architectural upgrades as well. (1) Addendum No. 1 Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications makes several technical clarifications as a result of questions during the bidding or phase. (2) Award of Contract On September 15, 1992, six bids were received for said contract. The four lowest bidders all made mathematical errors in their bids and when the corrections were made, the low bidder was Uhler, Inc. The bids ranged from a high of $1,989,000.00 to a low of $1,765,757.00, submitted by Uhler, Inc. A complete, corrected bid tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material. Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 1 , and award to Uhler, Inc. for their corrected low bid amount of $1,765,757.00. The engineer's estimate was $1,850,000. -11- October 14, 1992 DISTRICT 5 %%/ 31: APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOUTH COAST TRUNK SEWER, PHASE 2, CONTRACT NO. 5-35-2. In March 1988, District 5 entered into a financing and construction agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) which provided for funding of the South Coast Trunk Sever by IRWD. The South Coast Trunk Sever, will serve the new downcoast development by The Irvine Company located south of Corona del Mar. In May 1988, the Directors awarded a professional services agreement (design contract) to The Keith Companies for design of the project. During 1989, it became apparent that the South Coast Trunk Sever would have to be split into two phases because The Irvine Company needed to proceed with connection of facilities for the Pelican Point Golf Course and for units in the proximity of Newport Coast Drive; and that new plans for the design and construction of improvements and widening of Pacific Coast Highway through the Crystal Cove area would change the long planned alignment of this project south of Newport Coast Drive. Phase 1, approximately 4,700 feet of sever between the southerly city limit and a point south of Newport Coast Drive, Contract No. 5-35-1, was completed in January 1991. Phase 2, Contract No. 5-35-2, approximately 7,450 feet of sever beginning south of Newport Coast Drive to a point south of Crystal Cove is now ready to proceed. Because the South Coast Trunk Sever takes the same alignment as Pacific Highway (PCH), and because the realignment and widening of PCH through the Crystal Cove area was delayed by the new highway alignment, South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, was concurrently delayed. Contract No. 5-35-2 was originally planned to be included in a larger County of Orange construction project for improvements to Pacific Coast Highway as a separate (but deletable) bid item. However, when bids were received, the bid item for the District 5 work was considerably higher than anticipated. Therefore, staff has decided to notify the County to delete this from their contract. Because this project will now be a District 5 contract, additional work on the plans moat be done in order to accomplish this. The funding for this work will be in accordance with the 1988 agreement with IRWD which provides for IRWD reimbursement of construction costs after project completion. Staff recosmends approval of the plans and specifications and authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Contract No. 5-35-2. The bid date is tentatively set for November 10, 1992. The engineer's estimate for this work is $2,300,000. -12- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 5, 69 79 119 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING ON NOVEMBER 18, 1992 PNiTAT70N JrAJ `to,olilve 0".��� rI' u li 'o Sfoca l9bq �y OAgNOE COO ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ' ROLL CALL An adjourned regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on November 18. 1992. at 7:30 p.m., to the Districts' Administrative Offices. Fallowing the Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows: ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS DISTRICT NO. 1: Dan-6riset. GhaiMae a Robert Richardson xFred Barrera. Chat rman pro tem _Gene Beyer -7--Thomas R. Saltarelli Leslie A. Pontious 7--Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth James A. Wahner _James Ferryman DISTRICT N0. 2: x Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman John M. Gullixson x John Collins, Chairman pro tan —George Scott -7—Fred Barrera —_Gene Beyer 7--Buck Catlin _Chris Norby x Barry Danes _Bob Bell x W1111am D. Mahoney _James H. Flora x Garrey J. Nelson Glenn Parker x Arthur G. Newton —John 0. Tynes xlry Pickier —_Fred Hunter x Miguel Pultdo-7--Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth %George L. Zlaket _Norman Culver DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Sapien, Chairman Harry M. Dotson Burnie Dunlap. Chairmen pro tan x Carrey J. Nelson x Buck Catlin Chris Norby x John Collins —George Scott x Norman Culver —_Robert H. Main x James V. Evans _Margie L. Rice James H. Flora William D. Mahoney x Don R. Griffin —_Rhonda J. McCune x Frank Laszlo Gwen A. Forsythe Pat-MaGulgan A Robert Richardson x Eva G. Miller _Larry Herman x Richard Partin _Cecilia L. Age x Iry Pickier _Fred Hunter x Jim Silva _Earle Robita111e xRoger Stanton Don R. Roth charles Sylvia —Ronald Bates DISTRICT N0. 5: x Ruthelyn Plumper, Chairman Evelyn Hart —Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tem x John C. Cox, Jr. x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A. Wanner, Chairman _Dick Sherrick x Evelyn Hart, Chatrmmn pro tam Ruthelyn Plummer Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 7: x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman _Thomas R. Saltarelli xJames A. Wahner, Chairman pro tem Nate Reade xFred Barrera —_Gene Beyer John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn Plummer a Robert Richardson _Miguel Pulido x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton _6oi-iy-Anaa-6heWoan x Barry Hammond DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Linda Moulton-Patterson xJim Silva —Don MacAllister x Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M. Gullixson, Chairman Henry W. Wedaa x Fred Barrera, Chat nman pro in —Gene Beyer =Glenn Parker —Burnie Dunlap xiry Pickier —Fred Hunter x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton DISTRICT NO. 14: x Pear A. Swan. Chairmen Darryl Miller x Llalie A. Pontious, Chairman pro ten —Charles E. Puckett x Fred Barrera —_Gene Beyer Don R. Roth Roger Stanton _6aiiY-MMe-NraPidan x Barry Hammond _Z_ 11/18/92 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant Board Secretary, Corrine Clawson, Dan Dillon, Patti Gorczyca, Gary Hasenstab, David Heinz, Ed Hodges, John Kavoklis, John Linder, Margie Nellor, Bob Ooten, Gregg Pamson, Jeffrey Reed, Mary Simpson, Ed Torres, Jack Vincent, Chuck Winsor OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel , Phil Brisell , Mrs. Norman Culver, Jamel Demir, Walt Howard, Harvey Hunt, Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Paul Shoenberger, Ron Smith, Phil Stone x x x x x x x x x x x x x DISTRICT 2 & 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt re Board appointments That the minute excerpt from the Garden Grove Sanitary District re appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the Boards, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed as follows: District Active Director Alternate Director 2 George L. Zlaket Sheldon S. Singer* 3 Sheldon S. Singer* George L. Zlaket * Appointment to be effective 11/30/92 DISTRICT it Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive and file minute excerpt re Board appointments That the minute excerpt from the City of Huntington Beach re appointment of alternate Directors, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed as follows: (* Mayor) Active Director Alternate Director Jim Silva* Don MacAllister ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman briefly reviewed Presentation of PRIDE Awards to the Districts' PRIDE program which employees rewards employees for creative suggestions with an economic benefit to the Districts. He reported that at its last meeting, the Fiscal Policy Committee approved 15 PRIDE cost-saving or safety suggestion awards to employees totaling $9,123.00. -3- 11/18/92 Chairman Mahoney then asked Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations, to come forward and assist in the presentations of the three $1,500.00 awards (maximum award amount) to employees David Heinz, John Kavoklis and Jeffrey Reed. Mr. Ooten reported that David Heinz' suggestion, resulting in reduced electrical power requirements and more efficient utilization of the equipment, is estimated to save approximately $80,000.00 per year. John Kavoklis'suggestion, resulting in a reduction of chemicals, could save the Districts $44,400.00 per year. Jeffrey Reed's suggestion, resulting in discontinuing usage of the pumps at Ellis Avenue Pump Station, will save the Districts an estimated $26,000.00 per year. The Joint Chairman commended the employees for their PRIDE suggestions and presented them with their $1,500 cash awards. ALL DISTRICTS Chairman Mahoney recognized Districts' Presentation of service in to employee, Gregg Pamson, for 35 years District employeeUri gg Pamson of outstanding service to the Districts. Over the years Mr. Pamson has served the Districts in several capacities, including head of the laboratory division. His time is now devoted to operational research. His work has contributed significantly to the effectiveness and efficiency of the Districts' operations. He then presented Mr. Pamson with a plaque recognizing his 35 years of service. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that Adoption of resolutions of several Directors had recently retired appreciation for retiring Directors from the Boards. Chairman Mahoney then introduced resolutions expressing the Boards' appreciation to those retiring Directors. It was then moved, seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation: That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions expressing their appreciation to the retiring Directors and recognizing their outstanding contributions and dedication to public service: Resolution No. Director City/Agency District 92-154 Norman E. Culver Garden Grove 3 Sanitary District 92-168 Dan Griset Santa Ana 1 92-169 Pat McGuigan Santa Ana 1 92-170 Bob Main Garden Grove 2 Sanitary District 92-171 Arthur Newton Placentia 2 92-172 Ruthelyn Plummer Newport Beach 5 92-173 Sally Anne Sheridan Irvine 7 8 14 -4- 11/18/92 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. Joint Chairman Mahoney added that plaques were being prepared and would be �✓ formally presented to each of these Directors at a future meeting. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Presentation of resolution of Chairman presented a plaque and appreciation and plaque to resolution of appreciation to reti rim Director Norman E. Culver retiring Director No roan E. Culver, for years of service who had represented the Garden Grove Sanitary District on the Board of Directors since October 1962. Chairman Mahoney commented that Mr. Culver, on the Board of Directors for 30 years, had served as the Joint Chairman, District No. 3 Chairman and has been the Chairman of the Building Committee since its inception. Directors Don Rath and Roger Stanton also recognized Mr. Culver's outstanding service and presented a momenta from the County of Orange. The General Manager then presented a momenta from the Districts' staff to retiring Director Culver. Mr. Culver expressed his appreciation to the Directors and staff for the recognition. He then commented on the many changes that have occurred during his term on the Boards. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed Presentation of District pins to newly-seated Director George Zlaket Directors and alternate Director Barry Hammond to the Boards. He then presented pins bearing the Districts' logo to Directors Zlaket and Hammond. The pins are similar to the service pins given to employees and recognize the Directors for their service on the Board of the Sanitation Districts. ALL DISTRICTS - Joint Chairman Mahoney regretfully Report of the Joint Chairman announced the passing of Director Jack Kelly who represented the City of Huntington Beach. He announced that the Districts would adjourn this meeting in Director Kelly' s honor and memory. He then announced that the Ad HOC Committee for Service to Outside Areas would meet on Thursday, November 19th, at 4:30 p.m. It was further announced that the Fiscal Policy Committee would meet on Thursday, November 19th, at 5:30 p.m. Chairman Mahoney also called a Joint Works Selection Committee meeting to be held on Monday, November 30th, at 8:00 a.m. ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Sylvester gave a special thanks Report of the General Manager to staff members Anna Ubaldini and Eunice Kizziah who baked and decorated the cakes in recognition of retiring Director Norman E. Culver. -5- �.✓ ' 11/18/92 He then reported on the SWAP reversal relative to the Series B Certificates of Participation issue which was effectively accomplished on election day due to a lot of activity in the market. He then asked the Director of Finance to review the transaction. Mr. Streed then stated that early in the morning on election day there was favorable activity in the market. The financial manager, Patti Gorcyzka, prevailed upon Merrill Lynch and concluded the transaction. The total earnings for the last 1W years is $6.9 million. He stated that the Fiscal Policy Committee would be receiving a more detailed report on this transaction at their next meeting. ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly commented Report of the General counsel on his annual report on the status of various litigation matters that was Included in the Directors' agenda package. He also announced that later in the meeting the Boards would be adjourning to a closed session to review various issues. DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the `..r✓ adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed �...� approved, as mailed. -6- 11/18/92 DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held _ November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Ratification of payment of aint and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual District claims set forth on pages "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts so indicated. 10/07/92 10/21/92 ALL DISTRICTS Joint Operating Fund - $ 509,266.57 $1,046,825.28 Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,197,111.28 1,815,355.25 Joint Working Capital Fund - 127,164.09 162,949.23 Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 103,318.25 84,269.12 DISTRICT NO. 1 - 5,403.35 59,850.89 DISTRICT NO. 2 - 28,273.17 605,423.84 DISTRICT NO. 3 - 39,355.06 42,436.47 DISTRICT NO. 5 - 29,264.05 89570.11 DISTRICT�N — - 3,324.32 57.31 DISTRICT NO. 7 - 9,551.76 15,831.84 DISTRICT NO. 11 - 8,499.21 6,721.97 DISTRICT NO. 13 - 879.20 -0- DISTRICT NO. 14 - 8,966.49 319,754.53 DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - -0- 1,953.40 DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,316.51 -0- DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 115.47 2 685.87 2,073,808.78 4,172,685.11 -7- 11/18/92 ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awardin Purchase of Chlorine in Bulk, Spec fi cation NO. C-029, to That the Boards of Directors hereby DX Systems Company adopt Resolution No. 92-155, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Chlorine in Bulk, Specification No. C-029, to DX Systems Company for the price of $229.40 per tan, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding ch Purase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. P-136, That the Boards of Directors hereby to Imperial West Chemical Company adapt Resolution No. 92-156, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Ferric Chloride, Specification No. P-136, to Imperial West Chemical Company, at the unit price of $204.77 per dry ton, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 2 to the ions and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans Job Nos. I- an J-22-2 and specifications for Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9, and Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall , Job No. J-22-2, authorizing an addition of $212,764.00 to the contract with Colich Bros. , Inc. dba Colich and Sons for six items of additional work, and granting a time extension of seven calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Director Collins requested that Approving Change Order No. 15 to Items 2, 3 and 4 of this change order the plans and specifications for be re-negotiated with the design Job No. J-19-1 engineer for reimbursement of said items. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 15 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $9,758.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for four items of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. .�.✓ -8- 11/18/92 ALL DISTRICTS Director Collins requested that all Approving Change Order No. 15 to items except for Item 4 be plans and specifications for re-negotiated with the design Job No. J-19-2 engineer for reimbursement of said items. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That Change Order No. 15 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, authorizing a net addition of $75,527.46 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation for eight items of added or deleted work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Change Order No. 14 to the plans and spec if 1catlons for That Change Order No. 14 to the plans os Job N . P1-34-1, P1-35-2 and J-21 and specifications for Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing a net addition of $20,044.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for nine items of added or deleted work, be, and is hereby, approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company That the Boards of Directors hereby for right-of-way re Job No. J-19-2 adopt Resolution No. 92-157, approving and authorizing execution of Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for right-of-way required to operate and maintain Southern California Edison's substation at Plant No. 2 to accommodate the interconnection of Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized the Verbal Report on the National Districts' representative to the Water Research Institute NWRI National Water Research Institute (NWRI) , Director Buck Catlin, for a report on NWRI activities. Director Catlin stated that the Districts are one of the five public agencies that form the NWRI which was formed in 1991. The research work is funded, on a matching basis, by Joan Irvine Smith. The Institute's goal is "to identify and support research activities that address water supply and water quality needs". The Districts and the other four member agencies each contribute $50,000.00 per year to the program for the administrative costs. The other agencies involved are the Orange County Water District, Municipal Water District of Orange County, San Joaquin Basin Authority and Irvine Ranch Water District. The Institute has gathered approximately 20 people across the country highly talented in water technology as advisers. There is also an inter-agency committee that reviews the role of the institute to keep it on track and headed in the right direction. -9- 11/18/92 �i The NWRI has three different types of programs. The research projects are what the Districts and others are actively involved in now. NWRI grants money on a matching basis for research to see what can be done toward NWRI' s water quality goals. The other programs are cooperative programs and developmental programs. Director Catlin also used slides with his presentation. He stated that the Institute is gaining credibility. He reported that Senator Paul Simon visited NWRI to review its current work and future plans. NWRI is somewhat unique in that it has not asked for federal monies which is making an impression across the country and in Washington DC. Financially NWRI receives $500,000.00 per year from Joan Irvine Smith. NWRI encourages utilities, power companies, companies interested in water such as the American Water Research Institute and universities to also make financial contributions towards the research. The federal government is also contributing some funds as they have now become interested in the Institute's projects. Director Catlin stated that currently there are seven projects that are now in process, and they all have matching funds. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: Receive, file and approve written reports of the Fiscal Policy That written reports of the Fiscal Committee and Executive Committee Policy Committee's meeting and �.✓ Executive Committee's meeting held on October 21, 1992 and October 28, 1992, respectively, be, and are hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Actions relative to Biofiltration Demonstration Project Authorizing staff to conduct Moved, seconded and duly carried: Biofiltration Demonstration Project That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to conduct Biofiltration Demonstration Project to study the performance of biofilters for treating toxic, volatile organic and odorous compounds from Districts' off-gases. Authorizing the General Manager Moved, seconded and duly carried: to execute an agreement with u5C Tor services needed for That the agreement with USC for Biofiltration Demonstration Project services needed for the Biofiltration Demonstration Project, be, and is hereby, approved in an amount not to exceed $80,800.00; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel . -10- 11/18/92 Authorizing staff to secure the Moved, seconded and duly carried: sere ces of construction contractors to construct the That staff be, and is hereby, necessary support facilities to authorized to secure the services conduct pilot testing of construction contractors in accordance with established procurement procedures, to construct the necessary support facilities to conduct pilot testing of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project. Authorizing staff to secure the Moved, seconded and duly carried: services of contract analytical laboratories to conduct the That staff be, and is hereby, necessary testing authorized to secure the services of contract analytical laboratories, in accordance with established procurement procedures, to conduct the necessary testing relative to the Biofiltration Demonstration Project. Authorizing the General Manager to Moved, seconded and duly carried: execute a Grant Agreement with South Coast Air Qualit Management That the General Manager be, and District S AQMD for partial is hereby, authorized to execute funding a Grant Agreement with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for partial funding of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project in the amount of $124,568.00. Authorizing the General Manager to execute a Grant Agreement with Moved, seconded and duly carried: Water Environment Research Foundation TWERFT for partial That the General Manager be, and funding is hereby, authorized to execute a Grant Agreement with Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) for partial funding of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project in the amount of $50,000.00. ALL DISTRICTS Director Norman Culver, Chairman of Receive, file and approve written the Building Committee, invited the report of the Building Committee Directors to make arrangements with staff and tour the new laboratory facility. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the written report of the Building Committee meeting held on October 29, 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. -11- 11/18/92 ALL DISTRICTS �...� Actions relative to Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: ,61nas and specifications for Job N . P2-23-5-1 That Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1, making miscellaneous technical modifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications for Job No. P2-23-5-1 That Addendum No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1, changing the date for receipt of bids from September 29, 1992 to October 6, 1992, and making miscellaneous technical modifications, be, and is hereby, approved. Rejecting all bids for Job Moved, seconded and duly carried: No. P2-23-5-1 That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-158, receiving and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and rejecting all bids for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized to establish the date for receipt of bids for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid) . Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. Director Don Griffin requested that his vote in opposition to the motion be made a matter of record. ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the General Counsel Is Comments Prior to Directors of the need for a closed Closed Session session as authorized by Government Code Section 54956.9 to review: 1) Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the manufacturer and general contractor an Districts' two jobs relating to the co-generation internal combustion engines. 2) A proposed settlement of litigation entitled, United States Government vs. Montrose Chemical Company, County Sanitation Districts. 3) A proposed settlement agreement with Cherry Textron in regards to violation of wastewater discharge limits contained in Permit No. 1-1-330. -12- 11/18/92 REVISED ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: l I Convene in closed session ursuant �d to overnment ode Section The Boards convened in closed 54956.9 session at 8:28 p.m. pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9. Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings. ALL DISTRICTS At 9:32 p.m. the Boards reconvened in Reconvene in regular session regular session. ALL DISTRICTS Actions re Central--Power Generation System at Plan No. , ob No. J-19-2 Approving Settlement Agreement with Moved, seconded and duly carried: C-B Reci rocatin , Energy Services croup, and Brinderson corporation That the Boards of Directors re Job No. J-19-2 hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-174, approving Settlement Agreement relative to Electrical Equipment Purchase Contract, Job No. J-19A and Construction Agreement, Job No. J-19-2, between the Districts, C-B Reciprocating, Energy Services Group, an unincorporated division of Cooper Industries, Inc., and Brinderson Corporation, in form approved by the General Counsel , and authorize the General Manager and Board Secretary to execute said agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. A rovin A reement with Brinderson Moved, seconded and duly carried: Corporation re Job o. That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-175, approving Agreement between the Districts and Brinderson Corporation pertaining to completion of work for Construction Agreement, Job No. J-19-2, in form approved by the General Counsel , and authorize the General Manager and Board Secretary to execute said agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. A rovin Chan a Order No. 16 to Moved, seconded and duly carried: he plans and spec fications for Job NO. -19-2 That Change Order No. 16 to the plans and specifications for Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, authorizing an addition of $317,000 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation, for lube oil piping revisions and other filters, be, and is hereby, approved. -13- �/ 11/18/92 REVISED Authorizing staff to engage Moved, seconded and duly carried: Advanced Engine Technologies Corporation to conduct forensic That staff be, and is hereby, evaluation of the engine problems authorized to engage Advanced and to oversee the repair Engine Technologies Corporation to conduct forensic evaluation of the engine problems and to oversee the repair, in an amount not to exceed $136,000. Authorizing staff to engage Moved, seconded and duly carried: outside laboratory services to conduct forensic testing That staff be, and is hereby, authorized to engage outside laboratory services to conduct forensic testing in a total amount not to exceed $215,000. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and unanimously Authorizing consideration of carried: Supplemental Agenda item relative to the Annual Autlit Report submitted That the Boards of Directors do by KPMG Peat Marwick, Main 8 Company hereby authorize consideration of supplemental agenda item relative to the Annual Audit Report submitted by KPMG Peat Marwick, Main 8 Company which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date. ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that the Receive and file Annual Audit Annual Audit Report submitted by KPMG Report submitted by KPMG Peat Peat Marwick, Main 8 Company was V..� Marwick, Main 8 Company, Certified reviewed by the Fiscal Policy Public Accountants Committee at the October 21st meeting, as reflected in their report to the Boards that had been received, filed and approved as part of a separate item earlier in the agenda. However, consideration of the audit report by the full Boards had been inadvertently omitted from the November 18th agenda listing. Mr. Sylvester reported that the auditor had sent the reports to the Directors by overnight mail on November 17th. He further stated that a requirement in the Districts' Certificate of Participation indentures is that this report be approved by the Boards by the end of November. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the Annual Audit Report submitted by KPMG Peat Marwick, Main 8 Company, Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved. ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and unanimously Authorizing consideration of carried: Supplemental Agenda item relative to Refunding Certificates of That the Boards of Directors do Participation, IV92 Series hereby authorize consideration of supplemental agenda item relative to Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series, which was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting. -14- 11/18/92 REVISED DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 8 11 Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item relative to Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series Verbal staff report The General Manager reported that last month the Directors authorized a refunding of the 1986 COP issue and a portion of the 1991 Series B issue, designated Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series. Bond counsel has since determined that an additional Board action is necessary before that transaction can be finalized. He then asked Gary Streed, Director of Finance, to further brief the Directors. Mr. Streed stated that the Bond counsel has recommended modifications to resolutions adopted at the last Board meeting. The liquidity agreement will now include an irrevocable letter of credit. He further stated that bond counsel determined the Districts would be in a much better position regarding the tax exempt status of these COPS if the Boards were to take an action identifying and stating there will be some cost savings involved with this transaction. Mr. Streed further reported that due to the Financial Manager's perseverance, the Districts were already able to lock in the interest rate of an extremely favorable 5.55% on the transaction. The results will be a gross savings to the Districts of approximately $7.0 million. Approving Resolutions pertaining to Moved, seconded and duly carried Refunding Certificates of by each respective District: Participation, 1992 Series That its Board of Directors hereby adopts the following resolution approving matters concerning Refunding Certificates of Participation Financing pursuant to Districts' adopted long-range financial plan: DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 1 92-161-1 2 92-162-2 3 92-163-3 5 92-164-5 6 92-165-6 7 92-166-7 11 92-167-11 Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned in memory of Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992. -15- "` 11/18/92 REVISED DISTRICT 2 Actions re Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer. between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) , Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street Ninth Street) , Contract No. 2-2B; and Orangewood Diversion Street, Contract No. 2-29 Approving Change Order No. 8 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: plans and specifications for Contract Nos. 2-26-3, 2-28 and 2-29 That Change Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing an addition of $29,774.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for one item of additional work, and granting a time extension of 128 calendar days for completion of said additional work, be, and is hereby, approved. Approving Change Order No. 9 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried: ions and s ec ifications for Contract Nos. -26-3, 2-28 and 2-29 That Change Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications for said project, authorizing a net deduction of $94,677.50 from the contract with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for an adjustment of engineer' s quantities, be, and 1s hereby, approved. Accepting Contract Nos. 2-26-3, Moved, seconded and duly carried: 2-28 and 2-29 as complete That the Board of Directors hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-159-2, accepting said contract as complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned in memory of Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992. DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned in memory of Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992. -16- 11/18/92 REVISED DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment �.✓ That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned in memory of Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992. DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned in memory of Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Approving Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Comp-any Comp-any That the Board of Directors hereby for right-of-way re Contract adopts Resolution No. 92-160-7, No. 7-11-2 approving and authorizing execution of a Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for right-of-way required to operate and maintain voltage transformer and conduits necessary to provide electrical service to Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned in memory of Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992. DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned in memory of Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992. DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned in memory of Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992. -17- 11/18/92 REVISED �./ DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned in memory of Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9.34 p.m., November 18, 1992. AaC' ss s ant r to of a Boards of Direct o ofCbdnty Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 � -18- FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WINNING CAPITAL FROCESSING DATE lu/ul/92 PAGE 1 REPORT COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY NUMBER AP 9f CLAIMS PAID 1010192 POSTING DATE 1./07/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 125OC4 AMERICAN TELEPHONE L TELLGAAPN f1.501.01 ' LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES 125005 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC 350.0U I" SERVICES 125006 ACTION RENTALS S1.844.25 125007 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC 347u.125.06 RENTAL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 125008 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC 6993.02 CONSTRUCTION PI-33- P PI-35-2, J-21 AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLIES SY9 125010 AIR SOCIETY i CHEMICAL 1N il6.EL5.WJ 0B AGREEMENT O%Y GEN STET M.O.8-9-89 125011 AMEN CAN HI-LIFT OF CIVIL ENGR $ 721.68 PUBLICATION 125022 AMERICAN HIOLIF7 3721.8E RENTAL EQUIPMENT 125012 ANYE LL CCRP OR A710N 3390.eY MACHINE PARTS 125013 BLAME P ANDERSON $97.43 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT 125034 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL 3250.06 PEST CONTROL SERVICES 125015 A PLUS SYSTEMS $561.64 NOTICES 6 ADS 125016 ABC LABORATORIES f2.395.u0 SERVICE AGREEMENT 125017 AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY 41.390.00 LAB SERVICES 12501E ABATE% SERVICES INC $7.529.52 UNIFORM RENTALS 125019 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $10.601.50 METER TT7 125020 AURORA PUMP 413u50.60 PUNIP = 125021 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO $339.11 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 125022 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC $3.167.65 ROPE p0 1250923 BKK LANDFILL 63:167.66 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 125024 BRY IN FE TY L SUPPLY 11J53.96 SAFETY SUPPLIES 125025 BATTERY SFECIALTIES $2.303.67 BATTERIES 125026 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC f3.350.30 LAS SUPPLIES 1 125027 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES INC. 51.575.00 CAR WASH TICKETS F� 12502E YT DILLARD INC $181.82 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 125929 BOLEN RACIATOR SERVICE 3500.93 TRUCK REPAIRS - 125030 BON A-RUES 991.55 TRUCK REPAIRS 125031 BRENNER FIEDLER L ASSOC IN $1.560.11 MECHANICAL PARTS 125032 BROOMS INSTRUMENT DIY. 11.29T.32 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 125033 BROWN L CALDWELL CONSULTING $53.191.79 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19 12503A BUILDER-S EMPORIUM 313.54 HARDWARE/LUMBER 125035 BURME' ENGINEERING CO f1.3T6.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 125036 BUSH AND ASSUCIATES INC 31.188.uu SURVEYING SERVICES M.O. 6-10-92 125037 GARY 0 STREEO 64.937.10 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 125038 CHEM HILL $1.821.93 ENGINEERING SERVICES 125039 C M I 3129.39 ELECTRIC PARTS 125040 INC PRESS INC $325.95 LAB SUPPLIES 225041 IS COMPARY $858.47 HARDWARE 125042 1992 CWPCA ERIC f510.06 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 125043 CAL SOUTF EQUIPMENT CO $273.38 INSTRUMENT PARTS 125044 CALTROL INC $29.69 REGULATOR PARTS 125045 CALIF ASSOC OF SAN AfiENCIE f935.u0 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 225046 CALIFORNIA PIPE FABRICATORS 675.u0 REFUND PLANS R SPECS FEES 125047 CALIF WOCOYORKING MACHINERY 6433.15 SAFETY SUPPLIES 12501E JOHN CAMILLO ENGINEERS 5123.376.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36, PI-38 125E00/19 CENTURY SAFETY INS7 L SUPP $8.637.35 SAFETY SUPPLIES FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST VCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/ul/91 PAGE 2 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID lu/47I92 POSTING DATE 34/u1/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 125050 CHEM FRO LABORATORY INC $36..uu LAB SERVICES 125051 CHEVRON USA INC. 1969.8E PETROLEUM SUPPLIES 125052 COAST AFPLIANCE PARTS - $80.42 ELECTRIC PARTS 125053 COASTAL CHLORINATION 6240.04 CHLORINATION PARTS 125054 COLE FARMER INSTRUMENT CO 5512.13 LAB PUBLICATION N9 125056 COLLEGE PLACEMENT COUNCIL 5220.00 PUBLICATION 125057 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $268.14 MACHINE 9UPPLIE9 125059 COMPUTER INC. 8268.1. COMPUTER SERVICES/NARDXARe 12505E CONNELLRYE 290.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 125059 CONSOLI UM PARES / DIY $200.03 TRUCE PARTS 12506E CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL N19T - l5.718.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 125062 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 43.232.50 TOOLS 125063 CONVERSE AL CHECONSULTANTS CO lS r232.50 ECHLORINENGINEER N.0.ERVICE 125064 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS N C Se60.L9 COMPRESSOR SERVICES 225065 COUNTY WHOLESALES INC f3$929.13 ELECTRIC P PARTS TT7 125066 STATE WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 5929.13 ELECTRIC PARTS X 125067 STATE OF CALIFORNIA .141.55 PROCESSING FEE -SERVICES PATIO- S 125068 DAMES f MTIRE lB$124.32 BNGINHHRING SERVICES P1-38-3 12506E DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $431.66 GAUGE bO 125070 MEK/GEEKER $199.71 GAUGE 12507E DE GUCLLE [ SONS GLASS CO .944.85 0LA99 125072 DELL COMPUTER CORP fI5.999.85 COMPUTER HARDWAKE � 125072 DEW PAP SALES [ SERVICE 3199.03 BLeCTRIC PARTS N 1250i3 OEZURIK AND/OR CS CO 51.230.63 VALVES 12S Oi9 DIALOG 1NFOR RATION SERVICES - S34.DO COMPUTER SOFTWARE 125075 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $1.751.92 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-12-92 125076 OIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $247.29 PRINTING 125077 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 5399.0Y SERVICE AGREEMENT 12507A DORADO EATERPRISLS INC *24.020.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS 125079 DURO-SENSE CORP 5924.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS 125080 ERE TECHNOLOGIES 5250.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS 125082 EASTMAN INC $7.977.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 125082 ELECTRD•TEST INC $366.46 ELECTRIC PARTS 125083 ENCHANTER INC 44.480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-30-92 125084 PKM . COPIER PRODUCTS $164.a3 OFFICE SUPPLIES 125085 FST SAND AND GRAVEL INC 5236.12 ROAD BASE MATERIALS 12l086 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S5.98U.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 125087 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN PE f3.900.04 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9. 1-16 12508E FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP 1178.0u AIR FREIGHT 125069 FERRELLGAS $76.55 - PROPANE 125090 FILTER SUPPLY CO $453.43 PIMP PARTS 125091 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURA f350.0u PUBLICATION 125092 FISCHER L FONTEA CO $2.176.69 CHLORINATION PARTS 125093 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 1948.65 LAB SUPPLIES 12509E FISONS INSTRUMENTS - $219.82 LAB SUPPLIES 125095 FLO-SYSTEMS 91.394.61 PUMP PARTS FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL - PROCESSING DALE l0/41/92 PAGE 3 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNIV SANITATION UISIRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1J/67/92 POSTING RATE la 07/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 125096 FLUORAMICS INC s1B0.52 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES 125097 FORMA SCIENTIFIC. INC. $3.496.96 INSTRUMENT 125090 CLIFFORD A FORMLRT $27.307.03 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92 125099 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA s1Bl.B6 FILM 125I00 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $3.606.54 WATER USE 125101 FOUNTAIN VALLEY FAINT $234.64 PAINT SUPPLIES 1251L2 FOR ENTERPRISES S3.650.Wu SAFETY CONSULTANT 125103 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES 978.54 FITTINGS 125106 THE FOXBORO CO $872.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 125105 GET. INC. $706.W1 OFFICE SUPPLIES 125166 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO $3.951.69 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL 125147 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $1,973.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 125188 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $3.654.37 TELEPHONE SERVICES 195190 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC s3.659.80 MECHANICAL PARTS 125110 GRAMAM G JAMES S843.25 LEGAL SERVICES H.O.8-14-91 ITT 125111 WU GRAINGER INC $333.14 ELECTRIC PARTS 125112 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $2.292.32 PNOTD SUPPLIES = 125113 DON GREEK 0 ASSOCIATES S16 H72.JV SURVEY SERVICES H.O.6-10-92 125119 MACH CONFANY 91.696.0 LAB SUPPLIES 125115 MATCH A KIRK INC $719.37 INSTRUMENT PARTS 125116 PL MAIN CO INC 6136.69 FILTER 1P5117 HELPMATES TEMPORARY SERVICES s1.37T.2u TEMPORARY SERVICES a125118 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC SIr416.23 COMPRESSOR PARTS LN 125119 J.T. HORVATN s ASSOC. S3.u00.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17 129120 RS ,OGRES CO INC $1,376.62 PAINT SUPPLIES 125121 HUNTER CORPORATION $188.260.74 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1 125122 MUNTINbTON BEACH RUBBER SIX $352.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 125123 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C $150.74 BICYCLE PARTS 125124 IBM CORP/PC BOONS L SPECIA $587.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES 125125 INFERIAL WEST CHEMICAL s25.78J.51 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-14-90 125126 INDUSTRIAL FRACASES PRODUCTS $896.25 CONNECTORS 125127 INFOIRIEVE 425.5o PUBLICATION 125128 INGRAM PAPER 1191.79 PAPER 125129 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $135.47 TRUCK PARTS 12SI38 INTEGRATED BUSINESS INT. INC s54.547.46 OFFICE FURNITURE M.O.0-8-92 125131 J G GLASS CORPORATION $1,361.53 REFUND PLAN CHECK BALANCE 195132 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP s1.b35.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 125133 JAY-S CATERING $275.91 DIRECTORS• MEETING EXPENSES 125134 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO S1.429.26 GAUGE 125135 JM JOHNSOK GENERAL CCNTR s1.950.0O CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 3-17 125136 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 9139.13 ELECTRIC PARTS 125137 JONES CHEMICALS INC 35.980.87 CHEMICALS 125136 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARL C 5685.51 HARDWARE 125139 NALLEEN.S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $119.66 PUBLICATION 125140 KEENAN s ASSOCIATES S2.475.u4 SAFETY SUPPLIES 125141 KELLY SEPVICES SSu.16 TEMPORARY SERVICES FUND NO 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE lW/ul/92 PAGE REPORT NUMBER AP45 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CO UNIT CLAIMS PAID 16/67/92 POSTING DATE lU/ul/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 125142 KING BEARING INC S1.5J8.47 MACHINE SUPPLIER 125143 KNOA INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 66.J15.29 PIPING 125144 MARTIN KOROICK SR 33.146.Bu CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9 125145 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $102.71 PUMP PARTS 125146 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO 198.38 LAB SUPPLIES 125147 LAWTRONIK $161.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1251,48 LEGI TECH 3275.04 COMPUTER SERVICES 125149 LIEBERT CORPORATION S4.u80.53 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS 125250 KP LINDSTROM INC $4.205.67 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 125151 ARTHUR 0 LITTLE. INC $54.18 PUBLICATION 12S152 LOCAL AGENCY 44.V00.Ou LAFCO PROCESSING FEE 125153 SJCO -LYNCh COOP $128.58 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 125154 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $933.33 OCEAN MONITORING 125155 MDT 81OLCGIC COMPANY $245.76 SERVICE AGREEMENT 125156 NPS 3308.6V PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES m 125157 MACOMCO $133.78 SERVICE AGREEMENT X 125258 NA6NETEK NATIONAL ELECTRIC $1.325.23 PUMP PARTS s 125159 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 431.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 125160 MATT CHLOR INC 32.JDB.lu CHLORINATION PARTS 125161 MCKINLEY EQUIFMLNI CORP 376.37 TRUCK PARTS --1 125162 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO $54.99 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES n 125163 MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER $11.661.09 WATER CONSERVATION PROJECT 125164 MICROAGE OF CERRITOS $108.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE F 125165 MIDWAY MFG A MACHINING 314.474.13 IMPELLER 125166 MILLTRONICS 33.069.78 INSTRUMENT PARTS 125167 MISCO 1464.56 TAPES 125168 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO $107.60 ELECTRIC PARTS 125169 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO 1630.W0 PUBLICATION 126170 JAMES M MONTGOMERY $11.427.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES 125171 MONTGOMERY LASORATORILS 31005.00 LAB SERVICES 125172 MOTION IKDUSTRIES INC $12.35 MECHANICAL PARTS 125173 MULLEN A ASSOC INC S3.297.Su ENGINEERING SERVICES 125174 NASCO WEST INC $249.21 LAB SUPPLIES 125175 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTAL 125176 NEWARK ELECTRONICS 6598.57 ELECTRIC PARTS 125177 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $5.94 WATER USE 125178 NORTHWESTERN CARBON $4.278.88 CHEMICALS 125179 NUTECH CORPORATION $21.694.63 LAIR EQUIPMENT 12518P OFFICE ELECTRONICS. INC. $277.29 PAPER 125181 01 CORPORATION $06.25 LAB SUPPLIES 125102 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES $99.35 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS 125183 DV SYSTEMS CO 138.183.U6 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 125184 ORANGE. COUNTY AUTO PARTS C S82.67 TRUCK PARTS 125185 ORANGE COURIER $114.40 COURIER SERVICES 125186 ORANGE VALVE A FITTING CO. S1.335.67 FITTINGS 125187 ORION RESEARCH 3241.0u INSTRUMENT FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE lu/ul/92 FAGL 5 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1./u7/92 POSTING DATE 1V/U7/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OESCkIPIION 125188 OXYGEN SERVICE 65.417.77 SPECIALTY GASES 125189 COUNIV OF ORANGL 564.176.Wu USER FEE DATA M.0.11-13-91 125190 CSOOC SELF FUNDED MEDICAL 1 4102.000.00 MEDICAL PREMIUM ADVANCE 125191 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $2.103.14 SAFETY SUPPLIES 125192 PACIFIC SELL $226.88 TELEPHONE SERVICES 125193 FACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 66.6R6.W. TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 125194 PAK WEST 62.106.5. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 125195 PALMIERI. TYLER. WIENER. $1.536.40 LEGAL SERVICES 14-1-1A 125196 PARAGON CAOLL $34.95 CABLE SERVICES 125197 PARAMOUNT TANK INC $434.37 TANK TESTING 125198 PERKIN ELMER CORPORATION $1.927.95 LAB SUPPLIES 125199 PICKWICK PAPER SL13.51 PACKING MATERIALS 125200 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC 9217.592.23 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 125201 PITNEY SCWES $190.51 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 325202 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE 233.87 HARDWARE m 125213 POLYMETRICS. INC. $671.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT >G 125204 POLYPURE INC 522.252.33 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 = 125205 POSITIVE FORMULATORS. INC. 62R1.76 CHEMICALS 125206 NAROLO PRIMROSE ICE 1252.W0 ICE 195207 PROFESSIONAL TREE CARE $2.225.04 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES —I 125205 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 65.3J2.50 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 n 125209 R 6 S AUTOMATION 3150.93 ELECTRIC PARTS I R5210 CAVALCADE ESCROW CORP 69S.2R2.50 MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM M.O.8-12-92 V1 125211 RPM ELC CIA IC MOTORS 39.171.13 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIRS 125212 PACO MFG. L ENGR. CU 664.4. INSTRUMENT PARTS 125213 RED WING SHOES $576.68 REIRBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES 125214 REDI EXPRESS $28.35 COURIER SERVICES 125215 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY s1.005.11 HARDWARE 125216 REMOLD INC. 6112.88 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 125217 RONAN ENGINEERING CO 41.506.79 ELECTRIC PART 125216 R07ANIUM PRODUCTS CO $284.36 ELSCTRIC SUPPLIES 125229 JOSEPH T RYERSON L SON IN $755.37 STEEL 125220 SATETV KLEEN CORP S1T3.46 PARTS CLEANER 125221 SANDERS HYDROSEEDING 5521.73 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 125222 SANCON ENGINEERING INC $18.000.04 ENGINEERING SERVICES 125223 SANTA FC INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $900.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 125224 DOUG 3ARVIS 5675.06 FIRST AID/CPR TRAINING 125225 SEAVENTORES U.12 J.0. LAB SERVICES 125226 SECURITY SPECIALISTS 6320.0U SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS 125227 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 1313.01 HARDWARE 125228 SNURELUCK SALLS s5fi2.52 TOOLS 225229 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO $78.11 LAB SUPPLIES 125230 SKALER. IRC 65U.535.47 LAB SUPPLIES 125231 SKVPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL Cll 61.311.5u PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS 125232 SMITH-EMERY CO 6933.04 SOIL TESTING H.O.7-17-91 125233 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 67..89.99 POWER FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKIN6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE l0/.1/92 PAGE 6 REPORT NUMBER AP63 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 16/07/92 POSTING DATE 1010192 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 12523E $0 CAL GAS CO 65.66J.33 NATURAL OAS 125235 SOUThERN COUNTIES OIL CO 626.968.E6 DIESEL/UNLBADBD FUEL 125236 SOUVENIR FHOTO 6103.3b PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 125237 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC Sb2E.0S VALVE PARTS 125238 SPEK INOLSTRIES INC $517.18 LAB SUPPLIES 225239 SPRINGER`VERLAG 6109.1b PUBLICATIONS 1252E0 SRECO FLEXIBLE $73.E6 TRUCK PARTS 1252E1 STARNA CELLS. INC. 631E.77 LAW BUPPLIBS 1252E2 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS S780.0. LAB EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION 125263 STERLING ART 5175.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES 125244 SUMMIT STEEL $1.368.57 STEEL 125265 SUPELCO INC S152.71 LAB SUPPLIES 1252E6 TG SCIENTIFIC GLASS $94.0 LAB SUPPLIES 125267 TIF INSTRUMENTS INC $71.75 ELECTRIC PARTS 125248 IEKDRAULICS $1.071.25 MECHANICAL RBPAIRS m 1252E9 TELE•CELL. INC $66.26 OPERATING BUPPLIBS X 125250 CHARLES E TMOMAS S356.22 TRUCK PARTS = 125251 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 8571.69 HARDWARE b~0 125252 TOWS LOCK A SAFE SERVICL $73.E7 LUCK RB-KEYING 121211 TOYD LANDSCAPING CO $4.172.37 CONTRACT GROUNDS966PING M.O.11-13-91 12525E MESTRONICS S1.159.22 INSTRUMENT PARTS 125255 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY 1NL 5667.1E TRUCK PARTS n 125256 JG TUCKER 6 SOM INC 63.8S7.86 INSTRUMENT PARTS 125257 1M IN INS LABDRAIORIES OF S5.b65.5I SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91 125258 UNIT EO CONCRETE DDNPANIts s661.05 CONCRETE 125259 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5365.6E PARCEL SERVICES 125260 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP $250.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT 125261 MARK D SOBSLY $14.696.75 WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE M.O.3-11-92 125262 VWR SCIENTIFIC S2.700.19 LAB SUPPLIES 125263 VALIN CORPORATION 5111.59 REGULATOR PARTS 12526E VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO Sl,.J3.25 PLUMBING BUPPLIBS 125265 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $2.695.50 LAB SUPPLIES 125266 VERNE-S PLUMBING $110.00 PLUMBING SBRVICBS 125267 VILLAGE NURSERIES 129E.67 1JNDSGPING SUPPLIES 125268 WEATHER AAO MIND INSTRUMENT $290.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES 125269 WEST COAST INSTRUMENTS 6173.1V INSTRUMENT PARTS 125270 WESCG $217.61 ELECTRIC PARTS 125271 WHESSOL VAREC SB.352.78 VALVE 125272 WHITNEY PACHINERV INC 615..87.77 TRUCK PARTS 125273 MITES SCIENTIFIC 6905.1V LAB SUPPLIES 12527E WORDPERFECT CORP 6156.0E SUBSCRIPTION - 125275 XEROX CBRP $1.594.7. COPIER LHASBS 125276 GEORGE YARDLEY CO SISS.S. VALVE TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/0/92 32.W13.098.18 _aaaaaa aaaas vasav FUND NO 9199 - JT DIRT WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/O2/92 PAGE 7 REPORT NUMBER AP43 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 20/07/92 POSTING DATE 10/07/92 SUMMARY AMOUNT 41 OPER FUND $4,723.35 41 CAP FAC FUND 468O.OD R2 OPER FUND $18,829.38 R2 CAP FAC FOND $9,443.79 X3 OPER FUND $39,355.06 45 OPER FUND $21,305.32 A5 CAP FAC FUND $7,878.73 N6 OPER FUND $3,324.32 E7 OPER FUND $8,363.76 47 CAP FAC FUND $1,188.00 411 OPER FUND $5,201.71 h7 411 CAP FAC FUND $3,297.50 X 013 OPER FUND $879.20 s #24 OPEN FUND $4,250.00 814 CAP FAC FUND $4,726.49 0667 OPER FUND $3,316.51 M7614 OPER FUND $115.47 JT OPER FUND $509,266.57 CORP $1,197,111.20 SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $103,318.25 V JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $127,164.09 ------ $2,073,808.78 FUND NO 91V9 - JT DIST WLRMINb CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1.114/92 PAGE 1 REPORT NUMULN AP43 LEUhTV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE. COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1.121192 POSTING DATE lu/21/92 VARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1253.1 AG TECH CONPANV Al A9.b35.G1 'RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 1253L2 ACTION RENTALS 9385.51 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1253u3 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $970.71 LAB SUPPLIES 12b3A AIR FNCULCTS 6 CHEMICAL IN 6Yu.945.04 06N AGREEMENT OYY GBN 8Y8T M.O.8-9-89 1253(5 ALDRICH CHEMICAL CO $83.65 LAB BUPPLI88 125][6 ALHAPWR♦ FOUNLRY CO LTD 64.bbl.b9 HAMMER COVERS 1253.7 ALLIED SUPFLI CO $3.112.16 VALVE 12531)8 AMERICAN FISHEPILS SOCIETY $32.VU PUBLICATION 1253,9 ROBCO INC S/OR APERICAN SEALS 65.811.91 MECHANICAL BUPPLI88 125310 AMERICAN TVFE CULTURE COLLLCTN NJ.Gu PUBLICATION 125311 AMER ICA. WATER WORKS ASSOC. 61.722.Ou LAB BUPPLI88 125312 bIANL F ANDERSON $97.4b REIMBURSEMENT - CELLULAR TELEPHONE 125313 ANIATER • DISTR16GTION 1434.95 OFFICE BUPPLI88 125314 ANTHONV•S MECH A PAChINi. INC. $766.uu MACNINS RBPAIRS/PARTS 125315 ABC LABORATORIES S1.732.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT ,125316 AYUAIIL ILSTINu LABURATONY $1.30W.4W - LAB SERVICES m 125317 ARMOR VAC SWEEPING SERVICE 572O.b4 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES x 12531E ASSUCIAIEC SOILS ENbINLLFING $4.313.5. BOIL TESTING .s., 125319 bKK LANDFILL 64.u21.32 ,RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91 w 125326 BAN SAFETY L SUFFLY 51.780.b9 SAFETY BUPPLI88 125321 BANANA OLUEPRI11T S2,976.65 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES 125322 bAk CLAIS LAW FUdLISNLRS S211.0 SUBSCRIPTION CO 125323 PATTLRY SPECIALTIES 3636.1• BATTERIES 1 125324 bAATER DIAGNOSIICS INC 68.865.ib LAB BUPPLI88 H-' 12b325 VT UILLAPI, INC S522.49 MECHANICAL REPAIRS 125326 bOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 162A.96 RADIATOR REPAIRS 125327 RON A-RUES $222.33 TRUCK PARTS 12532E THE SONG BUILT $64.99 PUBLICATION 125329 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC 61.JO6.39 MOTOR 125330 STEVE ULBALU CONSTRUCTION LU 582..Bu.bi CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3, 2-28, 2-29 125331 UUUGET JANITORIAL 31.d5 J.uu JANITORIAL SERVICES 125332 EUILDLP-S EMPORIUM 524.15 HARDWARE - 125333 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFF S2.210.62 PUBLICATION 125339 GARY 6 SIPLEO S6plb.T3 PETTY GeN REIN13URBEHENT 125335 bb7LLR PAPER COMPANY 11.169.69 OFFICR BUPPLI88 12533b CLFA s75.V. LAB BUPPLI88 125337 Cn2M HILL 59.372.2E ENGINEERING SERVICES 125338 CAL bLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. 5399.97 LAB SUPPLIES 125339 CALTkOL INC 51..67.53 INSTRUMEM PARTS 125340 CAL VLSI LhTLRPRISLS 616.09.73 BOUND ABSORPTICN PANELS P1-38-2 125341 CAPITOL ENGUIMY. INC. - 621.2b OFFICE SUPPLIES 125342 CENTURY SAFETY INST L SUPP 11.932.2b SAFETY SUPPLIES 125343 VICK CLFER INC $611.99 TRUCK PARTS 125349 CHCMICAL LMb16ELRINU $53.9. PUBLICATION 12b195 CHEVRON USA INC 45.898.7a OIL b GREASE 125346 CINCULITING AIR $72J.Yu AIR CONDITIONER PARTS FUND NO 91S9 JI UIST VCHSINU CAPITAL PNOCLSSING TIME A./14192 PALL 2 RLPUNT NUMbLR AP43 CJUNTV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGL COUNTY CLAIMS PAID lu/2l/92 POSTING DAIL 16/21/92 WARRANT NO. VLNDUR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 125397 CLANK COASULTANTS 61.NSU.41 CONSULTING SERVICES 12534R COASTAL CHLORINATION 12.664..: WATER $TOTEM CHLORINATION SERVICES 125319 INC CONS GROUP /89.V. PUBLICATION 125354 COLICh AND SLNS Y7b7.3u7.u. CONSTRUCTION 1-9 125351 COMPRLSSUR COhPONLNIS OF CA SS.G11.39 PUMP PARTS 125352 COMPUSA. I,.C, 61.228.56 COMPUTER SERVICES 125353 CUMPUSLI,VE 614.3e COMPUTER SERVICES 125354 CONuhU•l FHOTOSNAPHV "b9.38 PHOTO BERVICSS 125355 CONNELL UM PARTS / DIV *139.52 TRUCK PARTS 125356 CONSOLIUATLU LLECTHICAL LIST tl..172.46 RLECTRICAL PARTS 125357 CONSGLIDAIEL VLASTICS CO 682.6J LAB BUPPLIRS 125358 CONIIhLNTAL AIR IUCLS IHC 62.146.b3 TOOLS 125359 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 53.232.5i CHLORINE M.0.9-9-91 125366 CONTIALhTLL GRAPHICS Y1V5.36 BLURPRINTING 125361 CONTRACTUK'S SOON STORE 64.447.6. PUBLICATION m 125362 CONVLRSE CONSULTANTS 6 L 1.3.123.25 RNGINERRING SERVICES I-9 X 125363 COOPLA IADUSTRIES INC &1`042.17 COMPUTER PARTS = 125364 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY Y916.43 TRUCK PARTS 125365 COUN71 WHCLLSALE ELECTRIC 69..5 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES OO 125566 CYIILRLA 62.2b4.uU SERVICE AGREEMENT 125367 CAL FOLY MELL066 UNIT iS.nuu.2L LAB SERVICES 12536E STATE OF CALIF ORNIA Y9.231..0 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE CO 125369 SIA7L OF CALIFORNIA 4230.13 DIESEL USE TAX N 125376 STATC b4ARO Of 46UILI2ATION 6473.34 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAOR TAX 125371 OE ARIA CORPORATION 115u.U, RENTAL EQUIPMENT 125372 PSK/UECKE6 $212.11 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 125373 OIATEC LNVIRGNNLNTAL $1.714.52 CHEMICALS 125374 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC Y9.28S.6U PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 RRPAIRS 125375 DUNN LUWAHOS CURT $560.91 PAINT SUPPLIES 125376 OU PLOT CO SAFETY SLNVICLS 61,653.3% LAD SUPPLIES 125377 LIL LNSTALMENTS INC 646.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 125376 LIM C6/NbS SUPPLY $9.31 FREIGHT 125379 EASTMAN INC $2.966.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES 125360 EJLh ANTLR INC 65."6..b OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 1253bl ENV.IREX 62.576..0 FITTINGS 125302 FALCON DISPOSAL SLRVICL 65.98u..1 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91 125383 JOHN b FALKENSTLIN PC 33.114... CONSTRUCTION BERVICES 1-9. 1-16 125361 FASTENING SOLUTIONS INC $212.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 125385 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 6T13.uu AIR FREIGHT 125386 FLNNELLGAS $25.52 PROPANE 125387 FILTERLINE CORP 652u.89 CHLORINATION PARTS 12631E FILTLR SUFPLV CU 6169.22 PUMP PARTS 125389 FISCHLN Y FONTER CU 16.45.6u CHLORINATION PARTS 12b396 FISHEP SCILNI1f IC CO 64.429.59 LAB BUPPLIRS 125391 FLU SYSTEMS .5.259.49 PUMP PARTS 12/\553392 FOUNTAIN VALLLT CAMLAA B`/ $62.6. FILM /F/ ( C FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WCkNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE l6/L4/92 PAGE 3 REP OR NUMbER AP43 CUUNIT SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGL COUNTY CLAIMS MID lu/21/92 POSTING DAIL 16/21/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 125393 FOUNIA16 VALLEY FAINT $209.14 PAINT SUPPLIES 125394 FbA INLuSINIAL GALES •317.47 FITTINGS 125395 THE FJABLNu CU 42.639.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 125396 C17T OF FUELLRTON $141.93 WATER USE 125397 6ANANL LUMBER CO 6J.ASL.4/ BUILDING MATERIALS 12539E 6ARRAIT CALLAIIAN CUMFANY 43.33U.bb OPERATING SUPPLIES 125399 GENERAL bIN01hG COMP 117b.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12b460 GENERAL LLECINIC SbFILT CO. 6196.9E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 12541.1 GENERAL TLLEPhDNE CD 44.171.19 TELEPHONE BERVICEB 12502 GEORGE LEECH L ASSUCIATLS E223.72 GAUGE 12$4L3 GIENLICh•PITCNELL INC 517.252.64 MECHANICAL PARTS 1254:4 DON ORLIN L ASSOCIATES 113.191... SURVEYING SERVICES N.0.6-10-92 1254Gb GERALU L GREER CO IML 1231.6E TRUCK PARTS 12E4.6 hSb TECnNCLJGV 6771.76L.lu CONSTRUCTION P2-66 12b4u7 HATCH L KIRK INC $214.86 ENGINE PARTS 1254ub HOLRbl GER CVS CALIF INC 6423.63 COMPUTER PARTS TT7 12b4:9 HORIZON HIGH REACH a LWUIP $101.85 TRUCK PARTS S 125414 J.T. HORVATH 1 ASSOC. 63.JG0... CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-21-1, J-17 125411 AS hUGHLS CU INC 4969.66 HARDWARE CG1 12b412 CITY Of HUNTI114101. bLACh 621.Tb WATER USE 125413 NUNTINGTON NO40A i1..91.42 LAB SUPPLIES 12b414 NVCL ONE I. 'ATDRIES INC 43.318.76 LAB SUPPLIES bG 125415 IRG NEChANALISIS 13.u23.38 TOOLS 1 125416 IMPERIAL WL37 CHEMICAL 659.59b.U3 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-16-90 W 125417 INDUSTRIAL THREADED FRODUCTS 6273.15 CONNECTORS 12561E INDUSTRIAL MSTL 139.0u SUBSCRIPTION 125419 INFONTEAI SYSTEMS. INC. s1.49u.VW SERVICE AGREEMENT 12542E INSIDE L.P.A. $165.4. LAB SUPPLIES 125421 INTCRMLC 13.936.51 LAB SUPPLIES 125429 INTERSTATE bATILRY SYGILMS 5796.66 BATTERIES 125423 IRVINL DCSPIOP GRAPHICS 4116.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARB 125424 IRVINE RANCH .ATER UISThICI $92.7b WATER USE 125425 JLA CREDIT "RP $145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE 125426 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 12.J21.67 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 12b427 JM JOHNSON GENERAL CURIA 62.500.1,0 DOOR RELOCATIONS 125420 JGNhSTLhE bUFILV 61.261.25 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 125429 JCNtS LHLMICALS INC 42.431.53 CHEMICALS 125430 JONES INDUSTRIAL MANGWARL O 61G6.41 HARDWARE 125431 RAP PROOLCTS 4499.17 TOOLS 125432 TELLY SERVICES 6312.3E TEMPORARY SERVICES 125433 KING BLARING INC $244.5b MACHINE SUPPLIES 125434 RAGA INDUSTRIAL SUPILILS 6795.74 LAB SUPPLIES 125435 MAPII6 KL6UICh IN 61.97U.Bu CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 125436 LA CLLLULAN 1LLLPHONE CU 4156.49 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES 125437 LIMITOAUUE CORP 12.845.9E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 125438 LINCOLN NATIONLL LIFE INS. CO. S1.8.82 DEFERRBD COMP TRANSFER FUND NO 9199 JT GIST h1kKING CAPITAL PROCLSSIN6 DATE 10/14/92 PAGE 4 REPORT NUMBER AP93 CUUNTT SANITATION OISIRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 10/2092 POSTING DATE 16/21/92 WARRANT NO. VENUUk AMOUNT OLSCNIPIION 125439 AP LINUSIRUH INC $3.42J.0. CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL 12b44U MCL LABOAATORIIS S4.965.0� LAB SERVICES. 125441 NOT BIOLOGIC CONPANV A243.2b LAB SUPPLIES 12b442 MIS $61.2. PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES 125443 NACOKCO 652u." SERVICE AGREEMENT 12b444 HAG SVSILNS S13..J1 INSTRUMENT PARTS 12b445 MAIIYTLKANCE PRODUCTS IKE $3.968.2b MECHANICAL SUPPLIES 12544b MARINE L VALVE SUPPLY $2,.0...3 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 125447 MAMVAC ELECTRONICS 5111.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES 125448 MATE ChLUR INC S4.85b..4 CHLORINATION PARTS 12F449 MECHANICAL CHIVES CO 6391.11 INSTRUMENT 125450 MICNO MUTTON 53N19.18 INSTRUMENT 12501 MICRGAGL OF GLNAITGS s3.b4b.i7 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 12b452 MIOVAY MFG S MACHINING 52.465.:u MECHANICAL PARTS 12b453 MILLTRUI.ICS 42.2414.41 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1254L4 MINNES.IA LLSTLNN VISUAL IRKS. $143.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES rn X 12b455 NLAULA bUhT1CM CONS7hUCT10A 45u2.686.Y. CONSTRUCTION 2-30 S 12b456 MOh TOUMLkl LAhGRATURILS 4315.6E LAB SERVICES 125457 MOTION IkuUSTMILS TUC i1U3.36 HARDWARE OU 12b458 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 569.3b SAFETY FILM RENTALB 125459 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS S118.53 PRINTING 12 b166 ALVANA ELL G IR.hICS $168.65 ELECTRIC PARTS O0 125461 NORLN PROCUCTS 61.1136.1b INSTRUMENT PARTS 1 125462 DX SYSTEMS CG 522.170.91 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91 r 125463 OPERATION TEC,NUt OGT INC s1.AM5.25 SERVICE AGREEMENT 125464 ONAN6E COUNTY AUTO IAhT5 C S154.14 TRUCK PARTS 225465 ORANGE CCUNTT GhEMICAL CO s743.74 CHEMICALS 12546E ORANGE VALVL s FITTING CO. 519.743.1E FITTINGS 125467 OSCAR•S LLCM A SAFE S2310.64 SECURITY SUPPLIES 12E468 UATGEN SEPVICI 44.375.43 SPECIALTY mass 225469 COUNTY SANITATION 015TRICT SA3.240L24 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE 125470 FACCO SALES $87.62 PAINT SUPPLIES 125471 PACIFIC PARTS s2.b32.66 INSTRUMENT PARTS 725472 PACIFIC t{FL11 LUUIPML%l CO s2.b22.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES 125473 PACIFIC bLLL $15..b TELEPHONE SERVICES 12b474 FACILL MEF161AN SYSTEMS 697P.69 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS 12t475 FAGEALI S1b2..4 PAGER RBNTALS 12f176 FARA60h CAULK 536.71, CABLE SERVICES 125477 FEAT MKRJICK MAIN L CO $16.860.0, AUDITING SERVICES M.O.3-13-91 125470 Pin6AMGJ PhESS PIC $80.1. PUBLICATION 225479 FICKVIEA PAFEh 5645.1. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 12548G PIMA GMU SYSTEMS IhL Slib.i21.bb RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91 125481 PITNi,T SCATS s266.lb POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE 125462 SCOTT POLK 42 N44.b7 DEFERRED COUP WITHDRAWAL 195483 FOLVMLTRIC5. INL. - $324... - EQUIPMENT RENTAL 125484 POLTPUAL INC $13.10b.31 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92 FUND NO 9159 • JT DIST LCkKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE IU/14/92 PALL 5 RLPONT NUMBLY AP43 C GUNTI SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAN6L COUNIT CLAIMS PAID 1./21/92 POSTING DATE lU/2l/92 WARRANT MD. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 12L485 F'bWLk LLECTAO SUFPIV LU $97.2. ELECTRIC SUPPLIES 12546f PKECISICh IhOUbTRILS 460.1. ELECTRIC PARTS 125467 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICL 1196.:. ICE 126486 PROFLSSICRAL Sf RV1CL IND. 619J.YG BOIL TESTING 125489 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 54.966..V INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91 125494 OUESTRON CORP i1.2 O4.u+ LAB SUPPLIED 126451 STEVE F. RADOS, INC. SS67..38.1u CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A-2 125452 RAINbON CISPOSAL CO $1.429.49 TRASH REMOVAL 126493 RAISIN INSTRUMENT CO $2.942.13 LAB SUPPLIES 125494 NECTC INC 5145.596.11 RESIDUAI.B REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91 126495 THE REbISTLR 63.198.3u NOTICES 6 ADS 125496 - NEMUTE Mc TLh kLSLTTIAG SVSI 46...O.U. POSTAGE 125497 MCWUUKIN•PCPUBLIC SUFPLV 43.568.Sa PLUMBING SUPPLIER 125498 ROMAN LNGINLEhiNb CO 4L.680.61 ELECTRIC PARTS 125499 THOMAS L. ROOD S2.uOO.0U DEFSRRBD COMP EMERGENCY WITHDRAWAL 1265IC ROSEMOUNT 3592.1E INSTRUMENT PARTS m 1255C1 JOSEPH T NYLHSON C SON IN 5045.64 METAL X 1255T2 SAf LIV KLLEN CORF 686.7. SAFETY SUPPLIES = 1255C3 SANTA FL INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 12.529.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES b0 1255L4 DOUG SARVIS 4375.0. FIRST AID/CPR TRAINING 12550 SCIENCE AFFLICATIONS INT-L $137.706.79 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92 —I 1255C6 SEA LIMO ELECTRONICS INC 61.396.Uu CAN SUPPLIES lid 1255LT SHAMhUCM SOFTLY 42.472.81 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1255[S SRASIA ELECTRIC S8b.398.Ua ELECTRICAL SERVICES J-27 U1 1255L9 SHURLLUCK BALLS ab.220.15 HARDWARE 12551L SMITH EMERY Cu 52.562.Wu SOIL TESTING H.O.6-10-92 125511 SO COAST AIR WUALITY $16.00 PERMIT FBBB 125512 SVLTN COAST VATLR 695..d WATER UBE 125513 SOUTFIkh CAL If EDISON LO 673.122.7E PONIES, 12561A SO CAL LAS CO $9.153.16 NATURAL GRI 12Sb15 NESTALLUT INC "11.82 WELDING SUPPLIES 12551E SPLA INDUSTRIES INC $597.61 LAB SUPPLIES 125517 SRECO FLEPIBLE 42.725.79 TRUCE PARTS 125516 JAhES STANFILL CONSTRUCTION 62.0OO.Ou CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 125519 STATE STRLLT BAhM 611.4T5.04 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES 125524 STAILLIUL INSTALLERS s884.0, LAB SUPPLIBB 125521 SUNSEI FCRU $95.55 TRUCK PARTS 12552i SUPELCO INC 464.71 CONNECTORS 125523 SUPLA CHLM CUPP 42.u23.11 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 125524 SUFLA FULLk FRUUUC7S 4155.Lh JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 125525 TLkORAULICS 4178.N1 MECHANICAL PARTS 125526 TLKMAA COKPANV 19.71G.eb LAB SUPPLIES 125527 THONFSON INUUSTPIAL SUFF-LV 41.155..1 HARDWARE 12552b TUNV•S LUCK L SAFE SLRVICL 1818.14 LOCKSMITH SERVICES 125529 TOWNL CREATIVE SERVICES *552.61 PRINTING 12553E TUVU LANOSCAIING CO 44.172.37 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.11-13-91 FUND NO 9199 JT UIST bCRMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE lu/14/92 PALL 6 REPORT WUNSCH AF43 COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICIS Of ORANGE COUNTY CLAIMS PAID 1U21292 POSTING DATE 16/21/92 WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 125531 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPFLT INC 6182.19 TRUCK PARTS 125532 JG TUCKER 6 SON INC 56.85d.2V INSTRUMENT PARTS 125533 TWINING LAUGRATORIES OF Sb6b.5. LAB SUPPLIER 125534 US 4610 CLASS LINTERS b133.11 TRUCK PARTS - 12b535 UNDERGROU6b SERVICE ALERT $218.OW CONTRACT SERVICES 125536 UNITED NCITINGHAM $1.163..7 RENTAL EQUIPMENT 125537 UNITED FARCEL SERVICE S145.64 PARCEL SERVICES 225538 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP 4827... SERVICE AGREEMENT 125539 SUPEh INTLf DENT OF DOCUMENTS V340.CV SUBSCRIPTION 125b4G V.R SCIENIIFIL $7,767.91 LAB SUPPLIES 12b541 VALLEY CITIES SUPFLY CO 5788.94 PLADMING SUPPLIES 12b542 VERNE-S PLUNWING b145..r PLUMBING SERVICES 12bb43 - VERTEA SYSTEMS $817.5. CONFUTER DATA SUPPORT 12bb44 6ASHIN610N VISTA INT. NOTLL 55SO.V. TRAINING REGISTRATION 125645 WEAThLN AAU 91144) INSTRUMENT 6291.36 SAFETY SUPPLIES m 12554b WESTERN HI&HNAY FKUDUCTS IN 5376.U5 TRUCE PARTS X 125547 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPFLY 582061.23 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-8-90 2 12b54b VLSTIN ENGINEERINO 41,527.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES 125549 NOURKL A WOODRUFF A 0k S1b6.161.65 LNGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92 12b55b WJ6UFEhtEL7 CORP 839..A COMPUTER SOFTWARE 125551 VLNTUkA SOFTWARE INC. b161.63 SERVICE AGREEMENT 12b552 GEONGE TANDLLY CO $569.78 VALVE 125553 YARDLEY - INSTRUMENIS 5551.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS 1 125554 ZIEBARTH L ALEER/C.S. ALFEN 977048.4E CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1 Ol TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1./21/92 54072.685.11 z zzzszzszsszzzz:: SUMMARY AMOUNT M1 OPER FUND 82,796.1E M2 CAP PAC FUND $57,054.71 M2 OPER FUND $9,405.30 M2 CAP PAC FUND $396,010.54 43 OPEN FUND $42,194.99 M3 CAP FAC FUND $242.48 MS OPER FUND $4,033.37 MS CAP FAC FUND $4,536.74 M6 OPEN FUND $57.31 M7 OPER FUND $23,958.99 M7 CAP FAC FUND $1,072.85 M11 OPER FUND $6,721.97 M14 OPER FUND $47.76 M14 CAP FAC FUND $319,706.77 P566 OPEN FUND $1,270.90 M566 CAP FAC FUND $602.50 MIS OPER FORD $2,685.07 JT OPER FUND 1,046,825.28 r C 815,365.2E }{` VGO IIORANCB FUNDS 1 , 9.23 'AXING CAPITAL - 62 94 ---------- t STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. lam/ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 .2, I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Adjourned Regular Board Meettiing. of Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held on /l�p�t� pw �,(�, 19fa_ was duly posted for public inspection at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on 19Q�. IN WWIITNNE-SIS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of 19j&&. Penny Kyle, A t Secretary of each of the B rW of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 6 14 of Orange County, California L�