HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-11-18 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
s OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 8127.FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728-8127
10844 ELLIS. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708-7018
(714)N2-2411
November 12, 1992
NOTICE OF ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 & 14
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1992 - 7:30 P.M.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting of October 14,
1992, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County,
California, will meet in an adjourned regular meeting at the
above hour and date.
Astist&nt B d ec terry
Or
Tentatively-Scheduled Upcoming Meetings:
AD HOC COMMITTEE RE - Thursday, November 19th, at 4 : 30 p.m.
SERVICE TO OUTSIDE AREAS
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - Thursday, November 19th, at 5: 30 p.m.
JOINT WORKS - Monday, November 30th, at 8:00 a.m.
SELECTION COMMITTEE
NOTE: This Joint Board Meeting Notice reflects the Boards,
change in meeting date from November 11th to November 18th
because of the Holiday.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
el ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
108AA ELLIS AVENUE
20 OOX SI27
PoUMAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA Wn
O+n W.2an
JOINT BOARD AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING DATES
Joint Board Meetings Executive Committee Meetings
November Nov 18, 1992** None Scheduled
December Dec 09, 1992 None Scheduled
January Jan 13, 1993 Jan 27, 1993
February Feb 10, 1993 Feb 24, 1993
March Mar 10, 1993 Mar 24, 1993
April Apr 14, 1993 Apr 28, 1993
May May 12, 1993 May 26, 1993
June Jun 09, 1993 Jun 23, 1993
July Jul 14, 1993 Jul 28, 1993 1 ,
August Aug 11, 1993 None Scheduled �•r'
September Sep 08, 1993 Sep 22, 1993
October Oct 13, 1993 Oct 27, 1993
November Nov 10, 1993 None Scheduled
** Holiday - New meeting date due to Veterans' Day Holiday
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County SankMan Dicta P.O.Box 8127.10844 HIS Avenue
'4 of Orange County,California Fountain Valley,CA 92n"127
7"phone:(714)962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 18, 1992 - 7 :30 P.M.
In accordance with the requirements of California Government
Code Section 54954.2, this agenda is posted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date and time above. All written
materials relating to each agenda item are available for public
inspection in the Office of the Board Secretary.
In the event any matter not listed on this agenda is
proposed to be submitted to the Boards for discussion and/or
action, it will be done in compliance with Section 54954.2, or
as set forth on a supplemental agenda posted not less than 72
hours prior to the meeting date.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance and Invocation
(2) Roll call
(3 ) Appointment of chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(4 ) Consideration of motion to receive and file minute excerpts
of member agencies relating to appointment of Directors, if
any. (See listing in Board Meeting folders)
(5) Public Comments: All persons wishing to address the Boards
on specs is agenda items or matters of general interest
should do so at this time. As determined by the Chairman,
speakers may be deferred until the specific item is taken
for discussion and remarks may be limited to five minutes.
(6 ) The Joint Chairman, General Manager and General Counsel
present verbal reports on miscellaneous matters of general
interest to the Directors. These reports are for
information only and require no action by the Directors.
(a) Report of Joint Chairman
(b) Report of General Manager
(c) Report of General Counsel
11/18/92
(7) EACH DISTRICT
ACTION: If no corrections or amendments are made, the
following minutes will be deemed approved as i )
mailed and be so ordered by the Chairman: �✓
District 1 - October 14, 1992 regular
District 2 - October 14, 1992 regular
District 3 - October 14, 1992 regular
District 5 - October 14, 1992 regular
District 6 - October 14, 1992 regular
District 7 - October 14, 1992 regular
District 11 - October 14, 1992 regular
District 13 - October 14, 1992 regular
District 14 - October 14 , 1992 regular
(8 ) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion ratifying payment of
claims of the joint and individual Districts as follows:
(Each Director shall be called only once and that vote will
be regarded as the same for each District represented unless
a Director expresses a desire to vote differently for any
District. ) See pages "A" and "B"
10/07/92 10/21/92
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 509 ,266.57 $1,046,825.28
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1 ,197 ,111.28 1 ,815,355.25
Joint Working Capital Fund - 127,164.09 162,949 .23
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 103,318.25 84,269 .12
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 5,403. 35 59 ,850.89
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 28,273.17 605,423 .84
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 39,355.06 42,436.47
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 29,264.05 8,570.11
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 3, 324. 32 57. 31
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 9,551.76 15,831.84
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 8 ,499.21 6,721 .97
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 879.20 -0-
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 8,966.49 319,754.53
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - -0- 1,953.40
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3, 316.51 -0-
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 115.47 2,685.87
12,073 ,808.78 $4,172,685.11
-2-
11/18/92
ti (9 ) CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEMS 9(a) THROUGH 9(1)
All matters placed on the consent calendar are
considered as not requiring discussion or further
explanation and unless any particular item is
requested to be removed from the consent calendar by
a Director, staff member, or member of the public in
attendance, there will be no separate discussion of
these items. All items on the consent calendar will
be enacted by one action approving all motions, and
casting a unanimous ballot for resolutions included
on the consent calendar. All items removed from the
consent calendar shall be considered in the regular
order of business.
Members of the public who wish to remove an item
from the consent calendar shall, upon recognition by
the chair, state their name, address and designate
by letter the item to be removed from the consent
calendar.
The Chairman will determine if any items are to be
deleted from the consent calendar.
Consideration of action to approve all agenda items
appearing on the consent calendar not specifically
removed from same, as follows:
ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-155, receiving
�./ and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and
awarding contract for Purchase of Chlorine in Bulk,
Specification No. C-029, to DX Systems company for
the price of $229.40 per ton, plus sales tax, for a
one-year period beginning December 1, 1992, with
provision for four one-year extensions (Estimated
annual cost $917,600.00 plus sales tax) . See page
.1c.,
(b) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-156, receiving
and filing bid tabulation and recommendation and
awarding contract for Purchase of Ferric Chloride,
Specification No. P-136 . to Imperial West Chemical
Company, at the unit price of $204.77 per dry ton,
plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning
December 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year
extensions (Estimated annual cost $1,146,712.00) .
See page "D"
(c) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 2 to the plans and specifications for
Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job
No. I-9, and Replacement of Portion of standby
Ocean Outfall, Job No. J-22-2, authorizing an
addition of $212,764.00 to the contract with Colich
Bros. , Inc. dba Colich and Sons for six items of
additional work, and granting a time extension of
�i seven calendar days for completion of said
additional work. See page
-3-
11/18/92
(9) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued) J
(d) Consideration of motion approving Change order
No. 15 to the plans and specifications for Central
Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job
No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $9,758.00
to the contract with Hunter Corporation for four
items of additional work. See page IF.
(a) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 15 to the plans and specifications for
Central Power Generation System at Treatment
Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, authorizing a net
addition of $75,527.46 to the contract with
Brinderson Corporation for eight items of added or
deleted work. See page "G"
(f) Consideration of motion approving Change Order
No. 14 to the plans and specifications for
Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3;
Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and
Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare
Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21,
authorizing a net addition of $20,044.00 to the
contract with Advanco Constructors, Division of
Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for nine items of added
or deleted work. See page ..H"
(g) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-157, approving v
and authorizing execution of Grant of Easement to
Southern California Edison Company for
right-of-way required to operate and maintain
Southern California Edison-s substation at Plant
No. 2 to accommodate the interconnection of
Central Power Generation System at Treatment
Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2. See page "I"
DISTRICT 2
(h) Consideration of the following actions relative
to the plans and specifications for Portion of
Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and
Orangethorpe Avenue (including City of Anaheim
Street Improvements) , Contract No. 2-26-3;
Ratella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and
Walnut Street (Ninth Street) , Contract No. 2-28;
and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract -
No. 2-29:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Change
Order No. 8 to the plans and specifications
for said project, authorizing an addition of
$29,774.00 to the contract with Steve Bubalo
Construction Co. for one item of additional
work, and granting a time extension of 126
calendar days for completion of said
additional work. See page "J"
[ITEM (9) (h) CONTINUED ON PAGE 5]
-4-
11/18/92
V (9 ) ALL DISTRICTS - (CONSENT CALENDAR Continued)
(h) (2) Consideration of motion approving Change
N + Order No. 9 to the plans and specifications
for said project, authorizing a net
deduction of $94,677 .50 from the contract
with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for an
adjustment of engineer's quantities. See
page "K"
( 3) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-159-2,
accepting said contract as complete,
authorizing execution of a Notice of
Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement. See page "L"
DISTRICT 7
(i) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-160-7,
approving and authorizing execution of a Grant of
Easement to Southern California Edison Company
for right-of-way required to operate and maintain
voltage transformer and conduits necessary to
provide electrical service to Michelson Pump
Station, Contract No. 7-11-2. See page .,M"
a
\� END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
( 10) ALL DISTRICTS
Consi eion of items deleted from Consent Calendar,
if any
-5-
11/18/92
a
(11) ALL DISTRICTS
Ver al Report on the National water Research Institute by --
Districts' representative, Past Joint Chairman A. B. "Buck"
Catlin.
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Executive Committee and consideration of
motion to receive, file and approve the Fiscal Policy
Committee's written report of their meeting held on
October 21, 1992, and the Executive Committee's written
report of the meeting held on October 28, 1992 (Copies
enclosed with Directors' agenda material) .
(b) Consideration of action on the following items recommended
by said Committee:
(1 ) Consideration of the following actions relative to
Biofiltration Demonstration Project:
(a) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to
conduct Biofiltration Demonstration Project to
study the performance of biofilters for treating
toxic, volatile organic and odorous compounds
from Districts' off-gases.
(kl) Consideration of motion approving and
authorizing the General Manager to execute an
agreement with USC, in form approved by the
General Counsel, relative to services needed for
the Biofiltration Demonstration Project in an
amount not to exceed $80,800.00.
(c) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to
secure the services of construction contractors
in accordance with established procurement
procedures, to construct the necessary support
facilities to conduct pilot testing of the
Biofiltration Demonstration Project (estimated
amount $25,000.00) .
(d) Consideration of motion authorizing staff to
secure the services of contract analytical
laboratories, in accordance with established
procurement procedures, to conduct the necessary
testing relative to the Biofiltration
Demonstration Project (estimated amount
$65,000.00) .
[ITEM ( 12) (b) CONTINUED ON PAGE 7] I l
-6- s
11/18/92
(12) ALL DISTRICTS (Continued from page 6)
(b) (2) (a) Consideration of motion approving and
authorizing General Manager to execute a Grant
Agreement with South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) for partial funding
of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project in
the amount of $124,568.00.
(f) Consideration of motion approving and
authorizing General Manager to execute a Grant
Agreement with water Environment Research
Foundation (WERF) for partial funding of .the
Biofiltration Demonstration Project in the
amount of $50,000.00.
(13 ) ALL DISTRICTS
(a) Report of the Building Committee and consideration of
motion to receive, file and approve the Committee' s -
written report of the meeting on October 29, 1992 (Copy
enclosed with Directors' agenda material)
(b) Consideration of action on the following item recommended
by the Building Committee:
(1) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to
the plans and specifications for Operations Center
Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1, making
miscellaneous technical modifications.
(2) Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 2 to
the plans and specifications for Operations Center
Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-3-1, changing
the date for receipt of bids from September 29 , 1992
to October 6, 1992, and making miscellaneous
technical modifications.
( 3) Consideration of Resolution No. 92-158, receiving and
filing bid tabulation and recommendation and
rejecting all bids for Operations Center Expansion at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1; and authorizing the
General Manager to establish the date for receipt of
bids for Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid) (Tentative bid date
December 8, 1992) . See page "N'-
_7-
Lr/
11/18/92
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Closed Session: During the course of conducting the
business set forth on this agenda as a regular
meeting of the Boards, the Chairman may convene the
Boards in closed session to consider matters of
pending or potential litigation, or personnel
matters, pursuant to Government Code Sections 54956.9
or 54957.6 .
Reports relating to (a) purchase and sale of real
property; (b) matters of pending or potential
litigation; (c) employee compensation; or which are
exempt from public disclosure under the California
Public Records Act, may be reviewed by the Boards
during a permitted closed session and are not
available for public inspection. At such time as
final actions are taken by the Directors onany of
these subjects, the minutes will reflect all required
disclosures of information.
(a) Convene in closed session, if necessary
(b) Reconvene in regular session
(c) Consideration of action, if any, on matters considered
in closed session.
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(16) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(17 ) DISTRICT 1
Con�tion of motion to adjourn
(18) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(19) DISTRICT 2
Con�tion of motion to adjourn
(20) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(21) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(22) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(23) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-8-
11/18/92
(24 ) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 25 ) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(26 ) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 27 ) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn
( 28 ) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
(29 ) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
( 30) DISTRICT 13
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 31) DISTRICT 13
Consideration of motion to adjourn
( 32) DISTRICT 14
Other business and communications or supplemental agenda
items, if any
( 33) DISTRICT 14
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-9-
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts P.O.Box 8127•10844 Ellis Avenue
of Orange County, California Fountain Valley,CA 9272E-8127
Telephone: (714) 962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
MEETING DATE
NOVEMBER 18, 1992 AT 7 : 30 P.M.
The following is a brief explanation of the more
important, non-routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda
and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are
enclosed with the agenda material summarizing the bills paid
since the last Joint Board meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS
9 (a) : AWARD PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN BULK, SPECIFICATION NO.
C-029.
The Districts use bulk chlorine for odor control in a
system consisting of one centralized 25-ton tank and associated
distribution equipment at Reclamation Plant No. 1, and two
centralized 25-ton tanks and related distribution piping and
equipment at Treatment Plant No. 2.
Our bulk chlorine usage has dropped to about 4,000 tons
per year from 6,000 tons per year for odor mitigation. This
decrease is partly due to the drought and the resulting decrease
in wastewater flows and partly due to increased operating
efficiencies. The Districts also used approximately 300 tons of
chlorine purchased in one-ton cylinders during the 1991-92 fiscal
year under a separate contract as backup for the bulk stations
and for remote areas of the plants with lower usage rates.
On October 13, 1992, four sealed bids were opened for
supplying bulk chlorine for a one-year period beginning
December 1, 1992, with option to renew for four additional one-
year extensions periods. Two bids and two "no bids" were
received . The high bid was $265.00 per ton. The low bidder was
DX Systems Company at $229.40 per ton, plus sales tax. This
price represents a $43.40 per ton price increase (approximately
23%) from the current contract price. The nation-wide demand for
�� -1-
November 18 , 1992
chlorine has escalated due to its use in the manufacture of PVC
pipe and fittings, which is a rapidly growing industry. In
addition, the number of chlorine manufacturers has declined due
to economic and environmental pressures. Estimated annual cost
for the new contract, based on 4,000 tons, is $917,600.00, plus
sales tax. The budget amount for the purchase of chlorine is
$1 ,134,000.00, including $150,000.00 for one-ton cylinders on a
separate contract with Continental Chemical Company.
Staff recommends award of a contract to DX Systems
Company for purchase of bulk chlorine for the unit price of
$229.40 per ton, plus sales tax, for a one-year period, with
provisions for four one-year extensions under mutually agreeable
terms.
9 (b) : AWARD PURCHASE OF FERRIC CHLORIDE, SPECIFICATION NO.
P-136.
The Districts add ferric chloride chemical to the
wastewater to enhance solids settling during primary treatment
and to control digester gas sulfide levels. Ferric chloride can
also be used as a backup chemical for plant odor control. The
use of enhanced primary treatment assists the Operations Division
in continuing to meet the NPDES 301 (h) ocean discharge waiver �../
permit limitations and AQMD permit requirements.
Sealed bids were received on October 13, 1992, for
furnishing and delivering ferric chloride for a one-year period,
beginning December 1, 1992, with an option for four one-year
extensions. Four bids and five "no bids" were received. The low
bid received was $204 .77 per dry ton, and the high bid was
$1 ,330.00 per ton, plus applicable sales tax. The low bid
represents an increase of $44.66 per ton, approximately 28% more
than the current year's contract with Imperial West Chemical Co. ,
which expires November 30, 1992. The price for ferric chloride
usually fluctuates widely due to product demand. This product
contains chlorine and hydrochloric acid, and both of these
chemicals have undergone recent price increases. The Districts'
contract with Chemwest for fiscal year 1987-88 was for $221 .00
per ton and was $263.00 per ton in 1988-89. In 1989-90, the
contract with Imperial West was for $234.00 per ton.
Additionally, AQMD regulations have nearly totally eliminated
production of ferric chloride in the greater Los Angeles basin,
which means the product must be transported from some distance,
which greatly adds to the cost due to freight charges. Based on
an estimated annual usage of 5,600 dry tons, the estimated cost
is $1,146 ,712.00, plus sales tax. The budget figure for this
purchase is $1 , 310,000.00.
-2- \�
November 18, 1992
Staff recommends award of a contract to Imperial West
Chemical Company for Purchase of Ferric Chloride for the unit
price of $204.77 per dry ton, plus applicable sales tax, for a
one-year period, with provisions for four one-year extensions.
9 (c) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO INTERPLANT PIPELINE AND
UTILITY CORRIDOR, JOB NO. I-9, AND REPLACEMENT OF PORTION
OF STANDBY OCEAN OUTFALL, JOB NO. J-22-2.
Job No. I-9, Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor,
provides for construction of a new 120-inch effluent pipeline, in
the westerly levee of the Santa Ana River, connecting Reclamation
Plant No. 1 and Treatment Plant No. 2. This $21 . 3 million
project also includes installation of a new fiber optic
communications cable system between the control centers at
Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2, and installation of a new digester
gas pipeline and industrial water pipeline. Job No. J-22-2,
Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall, increases the
size of the old ocean outfall pipeline in Plant No. 2 from
78-inch to 120-inch, and increases the capacity of the natural
gas service to serve the new Co-generation facility. Change
Order No. 2 adds $212,764.00 and seven days to the contract with
Colich and Sons .
Items 1 and 2 add $61,539.00 to the contract for
additional work in removal of the existing 48-inch interplant
pipeline inside the new 120-inch pipeline tunnels under Hamilton
Avenue and Adams Avenue. The contract drawings required the
Contractor to remove this pipeline prior to installation of the
new 120-inch reinforced concrete pipe. During removal, the
existing 48-inch interplant line was found to be of heavier
construction with reinforcing steel than shown on the contract
drawings. This resulted in the Contractor expending additional
labor and equipment for removal inside the confined work area of
the tunnel. Items 1 and 2 were planned as a potential change
order during original design of the job. In design of Contract
I-9 , staff found conflicting historical information regarding the
construction of this fifty-four year old pipeline. Some drawings
indicated that the line was built with certain thicknesses of
concrete with reinforcing steel; others indicated no reinforcing
steel. Staff elected to show the thinner sections of concrete
pipe with no steel, knowing that it would cause a change order,
if in fact, the heavier sections with reinforcing steel were
found. The alternative would have been to show the heavier
sections of pipe and the reinforcing. It is very difficult to
negotiate deductive change orders. It is much easier to control
costs through additive change orders.
`/ -3-
November 18 , 1992
Item 3, in the amount of $15,267.00, is for removal of an
undisclosed manhole on the existing 48-inch interplant line
constructed in 1938. The manhole was encountered during
tunneling operations for the new 120-inch pipeline under Adams
Avenue. The contractor was instructed to remove the manhole and
proceed with tunneling operations.
Item 4, in the amount of $6, 352.00, is for an addition of
three large fiberglass pull boxes inside a Reclamation Plant No.
1 utility tunnel to facilitate installation of the new fiber
optic cable. Congestion inside the tunnels from the large number
of existing utility lines forced the contractor to install a
greater number of conduit bends than anticipated on the new
interplant fiber optic cable system. This required the addition
of intermediate pull boxes in order to insert the new fiber optic
cable through the conduit system.
Item 5, in the amount of $117,205.00, is for mitigation
measures necessary for the many federal and state permits
discussed below. The permits were received after the contract
was bid and include conditions (i.e. , mitigation measures) added
by the regulating agencies. The mitigation costs include grading
work in the Talbert Marsh Wetlands between Treatment Plant No. 2
and Pacific Coast Highway adjacent to the Santa Ana River. The
950-linear-foot replacement of the standby ocean outfall was
originally planned for construction with future Job No. P2-42-2,
the Secondary Treatment Expansion at Treatment Plant No. 2, since
that work interfered with the existing ocean outfall alignment.
To complete the work within the Talbert Marsh as soon as possible
before the marsh is revegetated, the Directors authorized staff
to negotiate with CALTRANS in April 1991 to add this work to the
initial 900 feet already installed under an existing
reimbursement contract with CALTRANS. However, as it turned out,
the necessary environmental permits could not be secured in time,
so the change order authorized in 1991 was not executed.
Subsequently, this work was included in the Job No. I-9,
Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, which included similar
120-inch pipe.
Because there was no certainty at the time of bidding that
all necessary permits could be obtained during the term of the
contract, the pipe was made a separate bid item to allow its
deletion if the permits were not received; and, since any
mitigation measures were unknown, none were included. (In the
event of further permit delays, the installation would have been
included in a future, separate contract. ) Combining the pipe
purchase with the interplant pipeline gave us an exceptionally
low price for this relatively short length of pipe.
-4-
`�
November 18 , 1992
Although all permits and conditions necessary to begin
construction were not completed until August 1992, a meeting was
held in February 1991 with representatives of the Huntington
Beach Wetlands Conservancy (Conservancy) , U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (COE) , U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) , California
Department of Fish and Game (DFG) and the Orange County
Environmental Management Agency (EMA) . It was their collective
opinion that to obtain the necessary permits, OCSD should: (1 )
fill the Talbert Channel remnant isolated by the outfall crossing
to eliminate expected nuisance; (2) agree to mitigation because
disruptive activities would occur; and ( 3 ) determined that an
acceptable mitigation appeared to be possible by creating dunes
on the new fill and changing an ajacent half-acre site which was
to be dunes into wetlands habitat.
Staff proceeded with the design of the half-acre
restoration of the Conservancy. The restoration plan was
submitted, along with other exhibits prepared by staff, to
support the permit applications. The grading plan was modified
in response to comments from the Department of Fish and Wildlife
and by staff to accommodate gas service pipeline routing and to
reflect actual construction requirements. The total expense to
the Conservancy for the restoration plan and for construction
monitoring will amount to less than $20,000.00.
A permit for the Department of Fish and Game had no
significant restrictions except that landscaping be done with
California native species.
A permit was also required from Orange County EMA and was
was received in April 1991 .
A coastal development permit and then an amendment
required to correct the project description, including approval
from the City of Huntington Beach, were also obtained. A
landscaping plan for the secondary clarifier expansion prepared
in consultation with the Department of Fish and Game using only
suitable California native species had to be approved by the
Executive Director of the Coastal Commission. Staff hired a
landscape architect for approximately $2,000. 00 to develop the
plan. A written statement required from the State Lands
Commission that no state lands were involved in the project took
nine months to obtain, which allowed the permit to be issued in
August 1992, 13 months after the permit application was made, and
well after award of Job No. I-9.
The Corps of Engineers permit involved review of the
project by many agencies. Seven agencies suggested restrictions
�/ -5-
November 18, 1992
which were addressed by staff. A permit was issued after about
nine months, which contained preconstruction conditions that the
marsh restoration grading plan and restoration plan be
specifically approved by both the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
and California Department of Fish and Game. This required
working through the Conservancy and their wetlands consultants to
revise the grading plan to suit the regulatory agencies. The
necessary approvals were obtained in August 1992 after an
additional four months.
The addition of the mitigation measures was also a planned
change order. They could not be included in the original
contract since the required mitigation measures were not known at
the time. The work proceeded slowly. Staff did not expect to
have to do as much work as was required to obtain the permits .
However, it should be noted that these permits include all work
necessary for the Secondary Treatment Expansion at Treatment
Plant No. 2, a $36 million project which will be advertised in
about six months. In that light the permit conditions may not
seem excessive. Pushing both these projects now is certainly in
the Districts best interest since the permit conditions and
required mitigation would be much more severe if the marsh were
fully vegetated.
Item 6 adds $12,401 .00 to the contract for a differential
sales tax adjustment on materials purchased through June 1992.
The contract documents specify that the contractor may recover
from the Districts any increase in sales tax over 6 .5 percent on
purchased materials during the life of the contract.
The above-described changes would have been included in
the original design if discovered or known in the design phase
and are not for replacement work. If the Directors approve this
change order, the total cost of the change orders to date on this
contract will be $240,925.00 and 23 calendar days time extension.
This represents an increase of 1. 13% over the original contract
amount.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 2 adding
$212,764.00 and seven calendar days to the contract with Colich
and Sons.
9 (d) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 15 TO CENTRAL POWER
GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1 , JOB NO. J-19-1 .
Job No. J-19-1, Central Power Generation System at Plant
No. 1, is part of the $66 million master-planned Central Power
Generation System which is being built under several contracts at
-6- `/
November 18, 1992
both plants. This $16 .0 million contract includes installation
of three prepurchased digester gas burning, spark-ignited, 3472
horsepower engines with generators, which are each capable of
producing 2500 KW of electrical power. Change Order No. 15 in
the amount of $9,759.00 is for four items of additional work.
Item 1 , in the amount of $1,873.00, is for additional
circuits to provide future control power from the standby battery
system to the medium-voltage switchgear. Item 2, in the amount
of $2,180.00, is for providing conduits and cables for two
chiller flow switches required for operation of the chillers.
Item 3, in the amount of $1,528.00, is for providing raceway and
cable for the interconnection of the grounding transformer to the
switchgear. This work was omitted from the contract documents .
Item 4, in the amount of $4,178.88, is for modifying grating
support angles and aluminum railings which conflicted with the
installation of the Districts-supplied generator engines and
related piping.
A portion of Item 2 involves rework, and the appropriate
cost will be negotiated with the designer. If the Directors
approve this change order, the total cost of the change orders to
date on this contract will be $615,445.00 with 103 calendar days
time extension. This represents a total adjustment of 4.0% over
the original contract amount.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 15 for an
addition of $9,759 .00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation.
There is no time extension associated with this change order.
9 (e) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 15 TO CENTRAL POWER
GENERATION SYSTEM AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO.
J-19-2.
Job No. J-19-2 at Plant No. 2 is part of the new $66
million master-planned Central Power Generation System which is
being built under several contracts at both plants. This $21
million contract includes installation of five prepurchased
digester-gas burning, spark-ignited 4167 horsepower engines with
generators, which are each capable of producing 3000 KW of
electrical power, plus three prepurchased gas compressors. Change
Order No. 15 is a net addition of $75,527.46 to the contract for
eight items of added and deleted work.
Item 1 is the addition of signal cable for the monitoring
of total power generated by the engine/generators that had been
omitted from the drawings, at a cost of $3,892.00. Item 2 is the
revision of high voltage electrical cable splicing procedures to
`/ -7-
November 18, 1992
a means better suited for wet conditions with a resulting credit
of $10,923 .00. Item 3 is the replacement of existing high
voltage cable racks in various electrical manholes that were
badly deteriorated, at a cost of $21,786 .00.
Item 4 is the installation of electrical circuits for the
operation of the steam turbine that were not shown on the
drawings, at a cost of $41,859.00. The contractor was required
to provide a steam turbine and generator to meet the intent of
the specifications. It was not known prior to bid what
manufacturer would provide the steam turbine package. Therefore,
the complete electrical systems could not be designed until the
manufacturer's drawings were developed. Item 5 was the addition
of more electrical circuit testing due to changes in electrical
circuits, at a cost of $6,100.00. Item 6 is the alteration and
rerouting of the blow-off drain of a plant water strainer that
was causing flooding when activated, at a cost of $8,296.17,
Item 7 is the addition of a seal in the Operators Control Room to
prevent engine fumes from entering at a cost of $3,245.00.
Item 8 is the replacement of the specified pressure switches
present in the air compressor because they were preventing the
compressors from running continuously, at a cost of $1,272.29 .
Items 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 would have been included in
the original design if discovered or known in the design phase.
Item 2 is a credit for work not performed and materials not
utilized. If the Directors approve this change order, the total
cost of the change orders on this contract will be $1,673,998.01
and 218 calendar days time extension. This represents an
increase of 8.5% over the original contract amount. The high
change order percentage on this project is due to electrical
changes, electrical omissions and late delivery of gas
compressors, which was reviewed in considerable detail by the
Boards when Change Order No. 8 was approved.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 15 for a
net addition of $75,527.46 to the contract with Brinderson
Corporation. There is no time extension associated with this
change order.
November 18, 1992
9(f) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 14 TO CONSTRUCTION OF
DIGESTERS NOS. 11-16 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO.
P1-34-3; REHABILITATION OF DIGESTERS 9 AND 10 AT
RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-35-2; AND
INSTALLATION OF WASTE DIGESTER GAS FLARE FACILITIES AT
PLANTS 1 AND 2, JOB NO. J-21.
This $27.8 million project includes the construction of
new Digesters 11-16 (Job No. P1-34-3 ) , the rehabilitation of
Digesters 9 and 10 (Job No. P1-35-2) and the construction of new
Digester Gas Flare facilities at Plants 1 and 2 (Job No. J-21) .
Change Order No. 14 adds a net of $20,044.00 for eight items of
additional work and one item of deleted work to Job No. P1-34-3 .
Item 1, in the amount of $3,062.00, is for the addition
of vapor seals around power cable in Power Building No. 5. The
vapor seals were required by NFPA 820 (National Fire Protection
Code) to separate two areas within the building which have
different classifications and were not shown on the contract
documents. Item 2 is the deletion of a concrete sealer which was
specified to be applied to the exterior digester walls. This
deletion resulted in a credit of $3,500.00.
Item 3, in the amount of $944.00, is for modifications to
existing piping to accommodate contractor-installed sludge
meters. A conflict was discovered between the specified size and
the actual size of the existing piping where the sludge meters
were to be installed. Item 4, in the amount of $635.00, is for
increased access to the existing and new piping systems for
maintenance cleaning purposes.
Item 5 involves the modification of three safety relief
valves on the bottom sludge transfer pumps for $944 .00. The
valves were required to be increased in size from 2 inches to 3
inches to prevent future clogging.
Item 6, for $9,956.00, is for the relocation of the
supply air fans on the roof of Control Building 11-14. The two
fans were required to be relocated to conform with NFPA-820
(National Fire Protection Code) . This relocation resulted in the
installation of approximately 24 feet of additional ductwork.
Item 7, for $1,078.00, is the relocation of the two stairways
from the roof of Control Building 11-14 to the digester domes.
The walkways, as shown on the Contract Drawings, conflicted with
HVAC ductwork. Item 8, in the amount of $1,073.00, is for the
installation of pneumatic valve operators at two existing sludge
feed valves for Digesters 7 and 8 . The operators were shown on
the contract plans to be existing, but were not.
�� -9-
November 18 , 1992
Item 9 involves modifications to exterior lighting around
the digester facility for $5,856 .00 . These modifications were
required to provide safe and satisfactory lighting at night
around the digester facility.
All of these items, excluding Item 7, would have been
included in the original design if discovered or known in the
design phase and do not include errors and omissions. Item 7,
involves rework, and reimbursement will be negotiated with the
Design Engineer.
If the Directors approve Change Order No. 14 as
recommended, the total changes on this project will have added
$652, 359.54 and a total of 27 calendar days time extension to the
contract. This represents an increase of 2.4% over the original
contract amount. Of this amount, $353 ,670.00, or 1. 3%, was for
undisclosed utilities, substructures and soil problems. The
project is largely complete and in the testing phase and staff
does not expect any significant future changes on this project.
However, the contract contains a bonus/penalty provision for
early/late completion. At this time the contractor is ahead of
schedule and it appears that the early completion bonus will be
$822,000. The Directors may recall that a few years ago digester
capacity lagged treatment capacity and for this reason this
project was accelerated and an early completion bonus included to
insure timely completion of the digesters. The early completion
means that sludge can digest for a longer time than our fifteen-
day minimum regulation requirement, which was marginal before
this project.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 14 for an
addition of $20,044.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors,
Inc. There is no time extension associated with this change
order.
9 (g) : APPROVE DEDICATION OF EASEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON RE CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM PROJECT
(JOB NO. J-19-2) .
In April 1988, the Directors approved a Grant of
Easement to Southern California Edison (Edison) for right-of-way
required for construction, operation and maintenance of the
electrical substation, Orcogen, and appurtenances at Treatment
Plant No. 2. Edison now needs a larger easement.
The additional area is needed by for the installation of
switchgear, safety equipment and a metering device to accommodate
the interconnection of the Central Power Generation project (Job
-10- `�
November 18, 1992
No. J-19-2) . The existing duct bank, transformer and new
equipment will be owned by Edison who needs the operating
easement for the repair and maintenance of the electric service.
The new easement encompasses all of the old easement, but is 400
square feet larger.
Staff therefore recommends approval of the resolution to
grant the new easement to Edison. Separately, Edison will
quitclaim the smaller easement granted in 1988 to the Districts.
The form of easement and quitclaim have been approved by General
Counsel.
DISTRICT 2
9(h) : APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NOS. 8 AND 9 TO PORTION OF
EUCLID INTERCEPTOR SEWER, BETWEEN BROADWAY AND
ORANGETHORPE AVENUE (INCLUDING CITY OF ANAHEIM STREET
IMPROVEMENTS) , CONTRACT NO. 2-26-3; KATELLA RELIEF
SEWER, BETWEEN EUCLID STREET AND WALNUT STREET (NINTH
STREET) , CONTRACT NO. 2-28; AND ORANGEWOOD DIVERSION
SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-29 , AND ACCEPTING CONTRACT AS
COMPLETE.
This project is the construction of a vitrified clay and
two reinforced concrete gravity sewer lines and appurtenances.
Contract No. 2-26-3, Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between
Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue (Including City of Anaheim
Street Improvements) ; Contract No. 2-28, Katella Relief Sewer,
between Euclid Street and Walnut Street; and Contract No. 2-29,
Orangewood Diversion Sewer, in the total amount of $8 . 3 million,
are located within the City of Anaheim and the City of Fullerton.
The contract is now complete.
(1) Change Order No. 8
Change Order No. 8 adds $29,774.00 and 128 days to
the contract for one item of added work. Reference is
made to Item 5 of Change Order No. 1 which was for
demobilizing the contractor and interrupting the
completion of work on Contract No. 2-29 . This was due to
undisclosed telephone ductbanks at the intersection of
Orangewood Avenue and State College Boulevard. The
undisclosed ductbanks interfered with the completion of
the installation of the new sewer line. This item is for
remobilizing the contractor to complete the original
contract work and for added work due to the relocation of
the ductbanks. The relocation of the ductbanks was
accomplished by PACBELL, which took nearly a year. The
�� -11-
November 18, 1992
final sewer installation work was also scheduled to be
completed between the football and baseball seasons at
Anaheim Stadium which caused much of the delay.
(2) Change Order No. 9
Change Order No. 9 is the adjustment of engineer' s
quantities for a net deduction of $94,677 .50.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 8 for an
addition of $29,774 .00 and 128 calendar days and Change Order
No. 9 for a net deduction $94,677.50 to the contract with Steve
Bubalo Construction Company.
( 3) Acceptance of Contract as Complete
Steve Bubalo Construction Company has fulfilled all
contractural obligations within the specified and
extended time. Therefore, staff recommends adoption of
the resolution attached to the agenda material,
authorizing acceptance of the work as complete, execution
of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the Notice
of Completion as required. The final project cost is
$8,649,790.08.
DISTRICT 7
9(1) : APPROVE GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
RE CONTRACT NO. 7-11-2.
The Directors are aware that the Michelson Pump Station
has been rebuilt on a new site within the Park Place development
located between Michelson Avenue and the San Diego Freeway east
of Jamboree Boulevard within the City of Irvine. The station
receives power from Southern California Edison (Edison) , which
requires dedication of a power easement for that service.
Within our fee-owned parcel, Edison is requesting an 11 '
by 6 ' power easement and a 19' by 18' pad for the voltage
transformer.
The recommended action is to adopt a resolution
authorizing the General Manager to execute the grant of easement
to Southern California Edison Company for the necessary power
easement in a form approved by General Counsel.
-12- `�
November 18 , 1992
ALL DISTRICTS
11: REPORT ON NATIONAL WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE (NWRI) .
Past Joint Chairman A. B. "Buck" Catlin, the Districts'
representative on the National Water Research Institute board of
directors will present a verbal report on the accomplishments of
the Institute.
The Districts are one of five agencies that formed NWRI
to conduct multi-disciplinary water quality research and
associated activities with the goal of protecting and enhancing
water resources. The administrative functions are financed by
the five member agencies and the research work is funded by Joan
Irvine Smith.
12: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE AND FISCAL
POLICY COMMITTEES.
The Fiscal Policy Committee met on October 21 , 1992 and
the Executive Committee met on October 28, 1992. Enclosed for
the Directors is a written report on the Committees ,
deliberations and recommended actions for consideration by the
Boards.
\� 13 : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE.
The Building Committee met on October 29, 1992. Enclosed
for the Directors is a written report on the Committee' s
deliberations and its recommended actions for consideration by
the Boards.
14: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION.
From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to
convene in closed session to consider purchase and sale of real
property, potential or pending litigation, personnel matters or
other matters which are exempt from public disclosure under the
California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a situation
where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the
agenda, this standing item is placed on the agenda each month
providing for a closed session at the regular meeting, if deemed
necessary by the Boards.
J. Wayne Sylvester
General Manager
-13-
RE: AGENDA ITEM N0 , 12 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
4f ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
1ID644 ELLI6 AVENUE
October 28, 1992 2n 80x912,
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92720.8121
014)962.2411
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: October zu, ivvz 5:9 p.m.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
William D. Mahoney Joint Chairman Director Fred Barrera
Evelyn Hart Vice Joint Chairman Director John Collins
Buck Catlin Past Joint Chairman Thomas L. Woodruff, General
Don R. Griffin Past Joint Chairman Counsel
Norman E. Culver Past Joint Chairman Greg Beshouri , AETC
Dan Griset Chairman, District 1
Hank Wedaa Chairman, District 2
Sal A. Sapien Chairman, District 3 STAFF:
Ruthelyn Plummer Chairman, District 5
James A. Wahner Chairman, District 6 Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Charles E. Puckett Chairman, District 7 Blake Anderson, Director of
Grace Winchell Chairman, District 11 Technical Services
John M. Gullixson Chairman, District 13 Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering
Peer A. Swan Chairman, District 14 Gary Hasenstab, Director of
Don Roth County Supervisor Personnel
Gary Streed, Director of Finance
Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of
Absent: Maintenance
Bob Oaten, Assistant Director
Roger Stanton County Supervisor of Operations
Ed Torres, Air Quality Manager
1) Report and Recommendations of the Fiscal Policy Committee.
The Fiscal Policy Committee met on October 21st and considered several
items of business. Enclosed is a copy of the Committee's report on their
deliberations. The Executive Committee reviewed the following items:
A. Results of Ne otiations re Reimbursement for Errors and Omissions
hange Orders on Lonstruction Projects.
At the September Joint Board meeting, the Boards asked staff to
report back to the Directors on negotiations with consulting design
engineers pertaining to reimbursement for design errors and omissions
for certain specified items on construction change orders on four
contracts.
(1 of 4)
Executive Committee Report
October 28, 1992
Following a discussion of the enclosed staff report entitled "Results
of Negotiations re Reimbursement for Errors and Omissions Change
Orders", the Committee approved the report.
B. Review of Construction Project Change Order Practices.
Staff reported that in response to the recent discussions and concerns
expressed by Directors regarding construction contract change orders,
a detailed report describing the Districts' policies, procedures and
practices pertaining to such change orders had been prepared with the
hope that it would be helpful to the Board Members.
Following a discussion of the report, it was the consensus that the
Districts' construction management practices were appropriate and
effective.
2) Air Quality Compliance Issues.
A. Compliance with AB 2588 Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Notification
Obligations.
Utilizing the attached outline, the staff reviewed the enclosed
separate staff report (gray) outlining the requirements for the ....
Districts to comply with the AB 2588 Air Toxics "Hot Spots" public
notification requirements.
Following the review and Committee discussion, staff was directed to
proceed with the proposed compliance actions regarding public
notification obligations under AB 2588, as described in the report.
B. Authorization to Conduct Biofiltration Demonstration Project and
Enter Into Grant Agreements with SCAQMD and WERF for Partial Funding.
The Districts are faced with complying with new and evolving local ,
state and federal regulations that will limit the amount of toxic and
volatile organic emissions from our treatment plant. Within a couple
of years we will be required to develop a risk reduction plan and
implement control strategies to achieve specified emission reductions.
Staff has identified biofiltration as a promising technology to
cost-effectively achieve required emission reductions. However, this
technology must be proven before it can be applied at our facilities
or other treatment plants. Staff reported that it is therefore
recommending that a biofiltration demonstration project be conducted;
and reviewed with the Directors the enclosed (tan) separate staff
report describing the proposed project, utilizing the attached outline.
(2 of 4)
• Executive Committee Report
October 28, 1992
Staff further reported that concurrently with the investigation of new
technologies to meet increasingly stringent emission standards, at the
urging of the Directors staff has been seeking outside funding sources
for studying new technologies. A favorable response has been received
from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the
Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) for grant monies to
partially fund the proposed biofiltration demonstration project.
Estimated cost sharing would be as follows:
SOURCE AMOUNT
SCAQMD 124,568
WERF 30,000
CSDOC 125,432
Total $280,000
Southern California Edison has also indicated an interest and may fund
up to $50,000, in which case the Sanitation Districts' funding level
would be reduced to as low as $76,000.
Executive Committee Recommendation:
Following a discussion by the Directors, the Committee recommended the
following actions:
1. Authorize staff to conduct the biofiltration demonstration project
to study the performance of biofilters for treating toxic, volatile
organic and odorous compounds from our off-gases.
2. Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with USC for services
pertaining to the biofiltration demonstration project, in an amount
not to exceed $80,800.
3. Authorize staff to secure the services of construction contractors
in accordance with established procurement procedures, to construct
the necessary support facilities to conduct pilot testing of the
biofiltration demonstration project (estimated amount is $25,000).
4. Authorize staff to secure the services of contract analytical
laboratories, in accordance with established procurement procedures,
to conduct the necessary testing pertaining to the biofiltration
demonstration project (estimated amount is $65,000).
5. Authorize staff to enter into a grant agreement with South Coast Air
Quality Management District for partial funding of the biofiltration
demonstration project in the amount of $124,568.
(3 of 4)
Executive Committee Report ,
October 28, 1992
6. Authorize staff to enter into a grant agreement with the Water
Environment Research Foundation for partial funding of the
biofiltration demonstration project in the amount of $50,000.
Staff will report back to the Directors on the outcome of the grant
applications with SCAQMD, WERF and SCE prior to proceeding with the biofiltration
demonstration project.
3) Closed Session.
The Committee concurred in closed session to consider reports and
recommendations of staff and counsel pertaining to a matter of pending
litigation.
JWS:sc
Enclosures
L/
(4 of 4)
COUNTY SANITATION Dumas
October 22, 1992 W ORANGE COUNTY, CAUFONNIA
1 e EW AWE
vo WT9+n
i WMN VAI ..MMR"WR lF)
n1.Mz 11
REPORT OF THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
Meetino Date: October 21, 1992
FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE: OTHERS PRESENT:
Charles E. Puckett, Chairman William Mahoney, Joint Chairman
James V. Evans Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel
John Gullixson Peggy McBride, KPMG Peat Marwick
Evelyn Hart Steve Sardegna, KPMG Peat Marwick
Iry Pickler Cody Press, Merrill Lynch
Peer Swan Melissa Waters, Merrill Lynch
James Wahner John Coan, PaineWebber
Grace Winchell
STAFF PRESENT:
ABSENT:
J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Don Griffin Gary G. Streed, Director of Finance
Blake Anderson, Director of Technical
Services
Tom Dawes, Director of Engineering
Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of
Operations
Ed Hodges, Assistant Director of
Maintenance
Dan Dillon, Accounting Manager
Patti Gorczyca, Financial Manager
1. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IN DAILY EFFORT IPRIDE).
The Committee reviewed the enclosed staff report (lavender) summarizing several
PRIDE proposals evaluated over the past few months. Cash awards totaling
$9,123.00 and Certificates of Commendation were approved for the 15 PRIDE
proposals estimated to save approximately $190,000.00. Those employees
earning the maximum $1,500.00 award will be recognized at the November Board
meeting.
2. ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT AND MANAGEMENT LETTER FOR YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 1992.
Staff reviewed the draft Audit Report for the year ended June 30, 1992 and noted
that once again the auditor's opinion expressed no defects in procedures or control.
\. wl Letters to the Boards, reporting compliance with all COP issue covenants and petty
cash policies, were included with the Annual Audit Report.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 2
October 22, 1992
Peggy McBride, the Audit Partner from KPMG Peat Marwick, reviewed the conduct �.✓
of the audit and the results. She reported that this year's audit was the smoothest
in her experience with the Districts, that no significant audit adjustments were
proposed and that the 1991-92 Audit Report and Financial Reports were consistent
with the prior year.
Steve Sardegna, Audit Manager, discussed the Management Letter and staff's
response. He noted that these were not major concerns, but were areas of
recommended policy and procedural changes that the Directors should be aware of.
The Audit Report will be mailed by KPMG Peat Marwick directly to the Board
members for consideration at the November regular meeting.
3. INTEREST RATE MONITORING/SUMMARY OF SWAP EARNINGS.
The financing team gave a report on the interest cost and investment earnings of
the 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program, Series A, B and C Certificates of
Participation (COP) issues to the Directors. The attached staff report (pink)
provides the details for the following summary and presents the three-year SWAP
earnings and reversal analysis:
Total Net True
COP Interest Interest Interest Interest
ISSUE Paid Earned Earnings Cost
SERIES A $ 6,034,981 $ 9,039,677 $ 3,004,786 (1.5884%)
SERIES 11 ,558,791 9,639,910 (1,918,881) 1.1895%
SERIES C 318.620 538.689 220,069 (5.8847%1
COMBINED $17,912,302 $19,218.276 $ 1 .305.974 (1.8941°�)
4. STATUS OF SWAP REVERSAL.
On September 28, 1992, the Fiscal Policy Committee considered whether Districts
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 should remain in the Series B 3-year SWAP transaction, or
whether the Districts should capture the current high reversal profit by entering a
reversal SWAP transaction. At the meeting the Committee directed the financing
team to negotiate a reversal of the existing 3-year SWAP, when appropriate,
subsequent to the release of the latest unemployment figures, with the concurrence
of the Chairman of the Fiscal Policy Committee and the Joint Chairman.
The Joint Boards, at the October 14th meeting, ratified the Fiscal Policy
Committee's action and the financing team began the necessary steps to implement
the reversal SWAP.
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 3
October 22, 1992
The financing team gave a brief status presentation on the reversal SWAP and the
market to the Committee, noting that the market has behaved somewhat adversely
during this process, and the Committee further directed staff to execute the
reversal if total projected profits exceed $7,000,000 or fall below $6,000,000,
The total projected profits as of the meeting date are $6,684,000.
5. REFUNDING OF CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION, 1992 SERIES.
At the October 14th meeting, the Boards approved the Fiscal Policy and Executive
Committees' recommendation to authorize a financing team consisting of
PaineWebber, Underwriter; Mudge Rose and Rourke & Woodruff, Co-special
Counsel; Orrick Herrington and Sutcliffe, Underwriter's Counsel; and staff, to
conduct an advanced refunding of certain COPS. The refunding of Certificates of
Participation, 1992 Series, includes Districts 1, 2 and 3 1986 $117 million COP
issue, and one term bond of the 1991 Series B COP issue of Districts 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 and 11 . The restructuring was proposed because it could potentially save the
Districts a considerable amount of interest expense while improving some
provisions of the indentures. The Joint Boards authorized the financing team to
determine and implement the best combination of debt financing alternatives to
obtain the most favorable terms and conditions for the advance refunding, based on
the market conditions.
Staff and the underwriter updated the Committee on the status of the COP issue
and concurrent long-term SWAP including ongoing negotiations, the target interest
rates, and the potential issue dates.
The Committee and the financing team discussed the particular interest rate
sensitivity of this issue and reviewed the enclosed schedule of Reversal SWAP rates
(yellow). The Committee directed staff to continue to monitor the prospective
refunding rates while completing the remainder of the negotiations and to target the
issue below a 5.60% Reversal SWAP rate.
6. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT CHANGE ORDERS.
A. Results of Negotiations re Reimbursement for Errors and Omissions Change
Orders on Construction Pro i acts.
At the September Joint Board meeting, the Boards asked staff to report back to
the Directors on negotiations with consulting design engineers pertaining to
reimbursement for design errors and omissions for certain specified items on
construction change orders on four contracts. The Committee reviewed the
enclosed staff report entitled "Results of Negotiations re Reimbursement for
Errors and Omissions on Change Orders" and recommends approval.
4
Report of the Fiscal Policy Committee
Page 4
October 22, 1992 `
B. Review of Construction Proiect Chanoe Order Practices.
Staff reported that in response to the recent discussions and concerns
expressed by Directors regarding construction contract change orders, a
detailed report describing the Districts' policies, procedures and practices
pertaining to such change orders had been prepared with the hope that it would
be helpful to the Board Members.
Following a review of the report it was the consensus of the Committee that
the Districts' construction management practices were very effective, and the
Committee concurred with staff that the report should be reviewed with the
Directors at the Executive Committee meeting and at the regular Joint Board
meeting in November.
JWS:lc
KF:RFPC10.21
Enclosures
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
m ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
October 14, 1992
1(IB ELLIS AVENUE
G 0 BOx 127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.,CALIFORNIAOPN 92]2BR12]
STAFF REPORT P14191
Proposed PRIDE Awards
During the past few months, several Personal Responsibility in Daily Effort (PRIDE)
proposals have been evaluated. Following is a summary of those safety or cost-
saving proposals that staff recommends for certificates and cash awards, in
accordance with the Board approved PRIDE program. These 15 PRIDE proposals are
estimated to save the Districts over $190,000 and the awards total $9,123.00.
PRIDE No 125 - Underground Emergency Location and Identification.
This is a safety suggestion which has resulted in the labeling of the utility
system lines within the tunnels throughout the plants. This should allow an
easier and faster identification and response to problems that may occur,
saving time and limiting damage. The minimum safety award of $100.00 is
recommended.
PRIDE No. 178 - Distribution of Filtrate Solids.
This suggestion to reroute the filtrate solids from the dewatering facility to the
solids digestion system and back to the primary basins has the effect of
increasing primary capacity and improving retention time. The results are an
estimated $44,400.00 annual savings in chemicals, improved treatment and
increased digester gas production. Staff recommends the maximum award of
$1,500.00.
PRIDE No. 212 - Lock-Out Switch for Screen Pump and Catwalk.
This PRIDE suggestion is estimated to save $13,345.00 annually from the
installation of equipment stop devices on the primary basin catwalks, These
devices will prevent damage to basin skimming equipment, saving repair labor
and materials while improving reliability. The award of 10% of the annual
savings is recommended, in the amount of $1,335.00.
PRIDE No. 215 - Activated Sludae Plant Power Reduction.
Reconfiguring the Plant 2 Activated Sludge Plant to allow the rerouting of
flows between the east and west reactors will result in more efficient utilization
of the equipment and reduced electrical power requirements. The first year
savings from this suggestion are estimated to be $80,000.00 and the
maximum $1,500.00 award is recommended.
Proposed PRIDE Awards
Page 2
October 14, 1992 '
PRIDE No. 217 - Magnetic Starters for Control Launder Valve Motor.
Implementation of this suggestion has reduced the failure rate of the motors
that control the launder valves on the primary basins by preventing the
simultaneous starting of the forward and reverse relays. Staff recommends an
award of $924.00, 10% of the first year savings, to be shared by the six
employees who submitted this suggestion.
PRIDE No. 219 - Activated Sludge Plant Flow Optimization.
This suggestion has resulted in the reduction of flow to the Activated Sludge
Plant by reducing the DAF recirculation flow that was recycled through the
Activated Sludge Plant influent wet well; also reducing the power required for
pumping. The annual savings are estimated to be $8,427.00 and an award of
$843.00 is recommended.
PRIDE No. 221 - In-Line Ferrous Filter.
This suggestion is to install a clear filter on the lines from the ferrous chloride
pumping station prior to the meters which have periodically plugged. Use of
these filters will delay the plugging while allowing the operators to view the
ferrous chloride batches. Repair, maintenance and operations labor savings are
estimated to be $1,000.00 each year and, therefore, a $100.00 award is
proposed.
PRIDE No 222 - Grit Screw Conveyor Switch Relocation.
Relocation of the switch to operate the grit screw conveyor to a more
convenient and accessible location has been considered a safety suggestion
and the $100.00 minimum award is recommended.
PRIDE No. 223 - Area Safety Lighting for Chlorine Delivery.
This safety suggestion has resulted in the installation of a light over the
chlorine delivery truck to assist the driver and operators in the safe handling of
this chemical. The safety award of $100.00 is recommended.
PRIDE No 224 Valve Stem Protection Caps Stem Activated Sludge Plant.
This is suggestion to cover the pointed stem end of the knife gate valves at the
Activated Sludge Plant to reduce the likelihood of injury to the Operations and
Maintenance staff. A $100.00 safety award is proposed.
Proposed PRIDE Awards
Page 3
October 14, 1992
PRIDE No. 227 - Green Acres/City Water Use Reduction.
Either Green Acres Project or City water is used to keep the polymer lines clear
at the new P1-33 primary treatment facilities. This proposal to reduce,
automate and regulate the flushing process from continual flushing to as-
needed flushing is estimated to save $1,709.00 a year after amortization of
implementation costs. Therefore, a $171 .00, or 10%, award is proposed.
PRIDE No. 229 - Wind Direction and Velocity Printout Reduction.
Reducing the frequency of wind direction and velocity information printed in a
report from every five minutes to three times an hour has resulted in reduced
paper use and storage requirements. A $100.00 minimum award is
recommended.
PRIDE No. 230 - Watch Your Step.
This is a safety suggestion to extend and mark a small step outside the belt
press building which was a trip and fall hazard. A $100.00 safety award is
proposed.
PRIDE No. 245 - Extend Laser Printer Toner Cartridge Life.
Toner cartridges for laser printers are delivered set at a medium toner
disbursement rate. This suggestion to inform all of our users that this rate is
adjustable and of the techniques to extend the production from 4,000 pages to
11,000 is estimated to save $6,500.00 annually. A $650.00 award is
recommended.
PRIDE No. 252 - Ellis Ave. Pump Station Operation.
Recently the Sunflower Trunk has been diverted to Plant 1 during the daily low
flow period in order to maintain the plant's target operational flows. This
diversion will allow us to discontinue the use of pumps at the Ellis Avenue
Pump Station thereby reducing costs for flow control by staff, periodic pump
station maintenance and power for the pumps. This suggestion is estimated to
save in excess of $26,000.00 each year and, therefore, the maximum award
of $1,500.00 is recommended.
GGS:lc
REF:WPDOCS%FPC.MTGIPMDE.SR1
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
October 14, 1992
1�FILs aVExuF
PO Box 9127
FW WMN VALLEY,CALIFOANM 92729.8127
n1n9922n1
STAFF REPORT
1990-1992 Capital Improvement Program Certificates
of Participation Monitoring
The Districts' financing team continues to monitor the interest cost and investment
interest earnings of the 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program COP issues, including
the three-year SWAP transaction. The enclosed schedules show the net interest
earnings to date of the Series A and C variable rate COP issues, the reduced interest
cost of the Series B fixed rate COP issue and the past and potential earnings of the
SWAP.
SERIES A. B AND C NET INTEREST COST SUMMARY
The Estimated Series A Net Debt Service to Date schedule (blue) indicates that while
the variable daily interest rate paid by the Districts since December 1990 has ranged
from 1.00% to 9.75%, the average has been 3.24%. Overall interest earnings on
the Series A proceeds, including the reimbursement amount for 1989-90
improvements, on deposit with the Orange County Treasurer, continue to exceed
interest costs, resulting in a net positive cash flow.
The Estimated Series B Net Debt Service to Date schedule (gold) displays the net
interest cost of the fixed rate issue. There are three types of investment earnings on
this transaction: Interest earned on unspent proceeds deposited with the Trustee or
the County, interest earnings on the ten-year Guaranteed Investment Contract (GIC)
for the debt service reserve fund, and net SWAP earnings (discussed below).
The Estimated Series C Net Debt Service to Date Schedule (white) indicates that the
average variable daily interest rate paid by the Districts since September 1, 1992, has
been 2.71 %. Overall interest earnings on Series C proceeds, including the
reimbursement amount on deposit with the Orange County Treasurer, as well as
earnings on proceeds invested by the Franklin and Fidelity funds, exceed interest
costs, resulting in a net positive cash flow.
The pertinent interest cost, investment earnings and resulting all-in true interest cost
(TIC) figures for each issue and for all issues combined through October 13, 1992,
are summarized below:
1990-92 COP Monitoring
Page 2
October 14, 1992
COP Total Net True
Interest Interest Interest Interest
Paid Earned Earninas Cost
SERIES A $ 6,034,981 $ 9,039,677 $3,004,786 (1.5884%)
SERIES B 11,558,791 9,639,910 (1,918,881) 1.1895%
SERIES C 318,620 538.689 220,069 (5,8847%1
COMBINED $17,912,302 $19,218,276 $1,305,974 (1,8941%)
SWAP EARNINGS SUMMARY
The enclosed Summary of Weekly Analyses (pink) for the Districts' three-year SWAP
transaction summarizes that transaction's net profit performance through October 13,
1992. The SWAP has produced net profit to the Districts through October 13, 1992.
Column D reports the accumulated net earnings to date while columns E and F report
the potential total net earnings. Potential earnings in column E are calculated using
the average J. J. Kenny Index from column H and the higher potential earnings
reported in column F assume the current, below average, index reported in column G
will continue for the remainder of the SWAP.
REVERSAL SWAP STATUS
The Summary of Reversal SWAP Analyses and the 3-Year SWAP vs. Current Reversal
Profits (green) and the Potential Earnings Summary (gray) have been prepared for use
in evaluating the termination of the existing SWAP by executing a Reversal SWAP.
The reports indicate that the potential profits from a Reversal SWAP are currently
$4,028,903, approximately halfway between the expected profits from remaining in
the existing SWAP at average rates experienced to date and today's current-low rate.
At the last meeting, the Committee directed staff to proceed with a Reversal SWAP
as soon as appropriate. Staff and the financing team have monitored market
expectations regarding interest rates, actions by the Federal Reserve Board and
economic indicator, and are expecting to execute the Reversal SWAP during the week
of the Committee meeting.
PG:Ic
REF:RC.VrMSR 10.21 �/
KRRILL LYNDN A W. Draft Owd
$IN,aW,OM
Canty Swltstle0 Districts of Oren9e Canty
Certificates; of Pertlelptla
CePl tel Imwovwwt g Prrw
19%-92 Ear lx 6
............................................
ESTINIITED STATES A NET DEBT SERVICE TO 067E
A B C D E T D N I 6 C L N
IMereet Cate I.twnt EArninp
...................................... ...............................................................................................
Principal Oocsterdiw Pracee, InSwtd Kith Trustee _-_ Proceeds Imated Nlth Canty___.____
•................... ..................................... .------------------------- Total not
Principal An. Perledle IAN9e)t Proceeds An. Peddle A.Isinx Boost A". Periolic Investment Tint C t)/ All-In
MUsdiry Vl6(1) Debt Eerda W Trustee Tleld Eemlas Art. N/ Canty Vleld(2) Eernige Eeminp In, EnnfW TIC
.............. ....... ............. .............. ....... ............ ......... ... ....... ............ ............... ............. .............
12/m/% -- 12/31M E1W,000,000 5.8m1 E424,905.00 M8,7M,OM.W 7.50m2M S ,225.W SL9,DDO,OW.00 B.Mm 13W,310.22 E574,035.22 $149,130.22 (1.81322n)
01/01/91 -- 01/31,91 1W,OW,DW 3.1552 262,9W.01) 40.025.00.01) 6.9201 232,476.54 49,880,OW.00 E.8%1 369,52T.67 602,006.21 339.106.21 (4.100511)
Swint •- 02/28/91 1W,0W,0W 2.6161 21e.01011.33 35,277,0110.01) 6.5061 191;260.14 49,851),W6.01) E.87m IM,6%.n 559.956.47 341.948.14 (4.1576151)
03/01/91 -- 0/31/91 1W,000,0W 3.TIES 30,6n.W 22,054,000.W 6.3251 116,242.% 49,SO 000.W 9.DOm 374,1W.M 4%,342.% 1M,M796 (2.1966625)
O4/01/91 •- 06/30/91 1W,DW,OW 3.Mn 2D0,55D.n 13,046,0W.W 6.105B 66,371.53 49,MO,OW.W 5.61m 357,8l9.W 424,260.53 143,702.19 (1.747t2m)
0/01/91 -- 0/31/91 1W,OW,OW 3.619K 301.616.67 B,WI,OW.W 5.892C 39,2M.91 49,860,000.00 D.54m 3%,979.33 3%,2M.24 92647.55 0.1266711)
W 06/01/91 -- 06/30/91 1W, O,OW 3.3651 210,416.67 3,017.000.11D 5.907C 14,851.1E 49,21S0,000.00 m 8.21 341,262.13 356,113.52 75,6%.w (0.9M3731)
071ofni -- 07/31/91 1W,OW,OW 3.S6m 297,175.00 0.00 N/A O.W 49,MD,OW.W 8.12m 337,521.33 331',521.53 40,W.B (0.49055m)
011/01/91 •- M/31/91 i OWDO DID OW 1.19m 324,M6.67 O.W N/A O.W W m 49,MO,000.W B.Itm 337,1W.67 337,tm.67 12,259.W (0.14M1m)
0/01/91 -- W/30/91 IW, ,OW 4.M51 40,416.67 O.W N/A O.W 49,650,000. 8.48 352,485.A 352,4M.33 (52,01.33) 0.6435153
10/01/91 -- 10/31/91 1W,OW,OW 3.Wn 3T,2M.33 0.01) N/S O.W 49,M0,000.W S.13m 337,%v.w 337.937.01) 10,03.67 MINIM)
11/01/91 -- 11/30/91 1W,OW,OW 3.3601 25,6,6M.67 O.W N/A O.W 49,MO,OW.W 8.13m 337,937.W 337.937.W 41,m.n (0.5017921)
12/01/91 •• 12/31/91 1WOW,OW 4.13n 3M,758.33 O.W N/A O.W {9,MO,DOO.W e.ltm 337,105.67 337,105.67 ($652.67) (0.09 %)
MOM -- 01/31/92 1W,OW,DW 2.0691 1T,MS.m 0.01) N/A 0.00 49•8801000.W 9.30m 3M,570.W SM,S70.a 214,124.17 (2.6034653)
02/01/92 •• 021n192 1W,W0,000 1.9E93 165,718.39 0.00 N/A 0.01) 4918801000.01) 9.29m 356,1%.33 3M,154.33 220,05.% (2.6M20m)
03101M -- 03/31/92 1DO W) OW 2.M61 23B,W.W O.W M/A O.W 49,MD,OM.W 9.46m 393.220.67 393.220.67 19,376.58 (1.OM141)
M/01/92 -- M/30/n IW,OW,OW 3.Mn 30,555.56 O.W N/A O.W 49•MO,OW.W 9.SDm 3M,570.W 3M,570.W 81,014.M (0.9m02m)
05/01/W •- 05/31/92 1W,000,OW 3.1841 265,322.5E O.W N/A O.W 49,MO,000.W 9.15m 3W,335.W ]M,335.W 115,012.42 (1.19m9m)
W/01/92 -- W/30/92 1DO ON ON 1.Mn 155,558.11 O.W N/6 0.W 49,860,000.W 1.07m 3T,C 9.67 3TrOW.67 221,451.33 (2.6925541)
07/01/W •- 07/31/92 1W,OW,DW 1.am 150,8W.42 0.DO N/A O.To 4S,No DO 9.Wm 376,1n.33 376,1n.33 225.371.92 (2.74m231)
W/01/92 •- W/31/92 1W,WO,DW 2.19m 1M,1%.92 0.W N/A 0.W M W 49, 0,W0. 9.Mm 375,762.67 375,762.67 In:563.T5 (2.34131m)
W/011W -- W/30/92 1W,OW,OW =.eMi 240,OW.W O.W N/A O.W 49,M0,000.W 9.Otm 374,515.67 374,515.67 1M515.67 (1.6355321)
10/01/92 -- 10,13/92 1W,OW,OW 2.30t1 M,1%.44 O.W N/A O.W 49,MO,WO.W 9.OIm 162,2%.12 162,2%.12 79.095.6E (0.96IMS)
...-""... ............ ............ ............ ............... .....I....... .-...........
3.240%M.OM,891.22 5924.714.25 M,114,963.M M,039.6T.60 E3,OM,7M.3E 0.5551"%)
MERRILL LYNCH S 00.
$117,555,000 Draft Dated
m 9n Co y Sanitati Districts of Orerg oun e Cty
COPS -- Capital lsproveaent Progress t0/17/92
1990-92 Series B
.............................................................
ESTIMATED SERIES B NET DEBT SERVICE TO DATE
A B C D E F G N 1 J
Interest Costs Imeatae0t Earni rya
.................................... ..............................---........-----.....................-------------
Principal Outstandirg Proceeds Irrvested with Tn tee Proceeds Iro,ested with Canty
------------------------------------ -------------------------------------- .....--------------------.--..--------
Primipal F1aad Periodic Debt Umpent Proceeds Avg. Periodic Reisbursesent Avg. Periodic
Outstanding Rate Service w/ Trustee Yield Earnings Ant. w/ County Yield Eamings
.................................... ------------------------ ------------ ------------------------- -...._.-----
03/03/92 •• 03/09/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 42,893,663 4.223% 34,742 12,366,000 9.460% 22,439
03/10/92 •• 03/16/92 117,555,000 6.960% 156,SD5 41,679,172 4.223% 33,759 12,368,DDO 9.460% 22,439
03/17/92 •• 03/23/92 117,555,000 6.960% 156,805 41,679,172 4.223% 33,759 12,368,DDO 9.460% 22.439
03/24/92 -- 03/30/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,BOS 37,BSO,240 4.223% 30,682 12,365,000 9.46U% 22,439
03/31/92 -• 04/06/92 117,555,000 6.E60% 134,405 37,880,240 4.088% 29,698 12,368,OOD 9.300% 22,059
04/07/92 •• 04/13/92 117,555,000 6.960% 156,8D5 37,022,901 4.085% 29,026 12,368,DDO 9.300% 22,059
04/14/92 -- 04/20/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 37,022,807 4.088% 29,026 12,366 000 9.300% 22,059
04/21/92 •• 04/27/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 33,696,588 4.088% 26,41a 12,368,000 9.300% 22,059
04/28/92 -• 05/04/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 33,696,595 3.968% 25,642 12,368,ODO 9.I50X 21,703
05/05/92 -- 05/11/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 32,047,512 3.966% 24,387 12,368,000 9.15D% 21,703
05/12/92 -- 05/18/92 117.555,000 6.860% 156,805 32,041.512 3.968% 24,387 12,30,000 9.150% 21,M3
OS/19/92 -- 05/25/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 27,472,264 3.968% 20,906 12,368,000 9.150% 21,703
05/26/92 -- 06/01/92 117,555,000 6.86U% 134,405 27,472,264 3.968% 20,906 12,365,000 9.150% 21, OS
06/02/92 -- 06/03/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 24,605,907 3.884% 18,329 12,368,000 9.07D% 21,514
06109M -- 06/15/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 24,608,907 3.884% 18,329 12,368,000 9.07U% 21,914
06/16/92 -- 06/22/92 117,555,000 6.660% 156,805 24,608,907 3.854% 18,329 12,368,000 9.070% 21,514
06/23/92 •• 06/29/92 117,555,ODO 6.860% 156,805 9,071,269 3.884% 6,756 12,368,000 9.070X 21,514
06/30/92 -- 07/06/92 117,555,ODO 6.860% 156.805 8,542,672 3.525% 5,775 12,368,000 9.050% 21,466
07/07/92 -- 07/13/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 8,542,672 3.525% 5,775 12,368:000 9.050% 21,466
07/14/92 •- 07/20/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,8D5 7,916,590 3.525% 5,352 12,365,000 9.050% 21,466
07/21/92 •• 07/27/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,a05 7,916,590 3.525% 5,352 12,365 000 9.050% 21,466
07/28/92 -- 08/03/92 117,555,000 6.860% 134,405 7,128,113 3.422% 4,678 12,365:000 9.040% 21,442
08/04/92 -- 08/10/92 117,555,000 6.86D% 156,BD5 7,128,713 3.422% 4,678 12,368,000 9.040% 21,442
05/11/92 -- 011/17/92 117,555.000 6.86OX 156,805 6267,762 3.422% 4,113 12,368,000 9.040% 21,442
08/18/92 -• 08/24/92 117,553,000 6.ium 156,805 6:267,762 3.422% 4,113 12,365,000 9.040% 21,42
08/25/92 -- 08/31/92 117,555,000 6.860% 134,4D5 5,692,347 3.422% 3,735 12,368,000 9.040% 21,442
09/01/92 •• 09/07/92 117,555,000 6.860X 156,805 5,692,347 3.162% 3,452 12,365,000 9.010% 21,371
09/06/92 -- 09/14/92 117,555,000 6.960% 156,805 5,692,347 3.162%
3,f52 12,368,000 9.010% 21,371
09/15/92 -- 09/21/92 117,555,000 6.a60% 156,805 5,206,844 3.162% 3,157 12,368.000 9.010% 21,371
09/22/92 -- 09/28/92 117,555,000 6.a6O% 156,805 4,827,958 3.1629 2,927 12366,000 9.01OX 21.371
09/29/92 •• 10/05/92 117,555,000 6.11M 156,805 4,827,958 3.162% 2,927 12:368,000 9.010% 21,371
10/06/92 -- 10/12/92 117,555,000 6.860% 156,805 4,827,958 3.162% 2,927 12,368,000 9.010% 21,371
-... .. ..---..- --- ......--....
$11,558,791 Oe ,750,090 ':Si_555,,m
MERRILL LYNCH 8 CO.
S117,555,000 Draft Dated
Co
unty Sanitation Districts of Orange Canty
COPS -- Capital Improvement Progres 10/13/92
1M-92 Series B
-------------------------------------------------------------
ESTIMATED SERIES B NET DEBT SERVICE TO DATE -- PAGE 2
K L M N 0 P 0 R S
Investment Earnings
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------GIC Earrings_________._ - -------------- SNAP - ----- -
____________ Total Net
Invested Avg. Reserve Faxi Fleeting Fixed Net Investment Lint Cost)/ All-In
Funds TWO In GIC Int. Paid Int. Rer'd Earnings Earnings Int Earnings TIC
____________ _________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________
03/03/92 -- 03/09/92 9,513625 8.010% 14,614 49,331 120,905 71,577 143373 f13432) 0.624526%
03/10/92 -• 03/16/92 9,513:625 8.010% 14,614 59,626 120,9DB 61,282 132:094 (24:711) 1.145925%
03/17/92 -- 03/23/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 63,916 120,9D8 56,993 127,804 (29,001) 1.343368%
03/24/92 -- 03/30/92 9,513,625 8.CIO% 14,614 79,144 120,908 41,764 109,499 f47,306) 2.19%53%
03/31/92 -- 04/06/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 72,709 103,636 30,926 97,298 f37,107) 1.725239%
04/07/92 -- 04/13/92 9,513,625 8.01OX 14,614 72,495 120,908 48,413 114 113 (42,693) 1.954951%
04/14/92 -- 04/20/92 9,913,625 8.010% 14.614 76,356 120,908 44,553 110:252 (46,553) 2.164449%
04/21/92 -- 04/27/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 80,216 120,908 40,692 103,784 (53,022) 2.465193%
04/28/92 -- 05/D4/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 830433 120,9D8 37,475 99435 (57,371) 2.667402%
05/05/92 -- 05/11/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 77,428 120,908 43,480 104:185 (52,620) 2.446527%
05/12/92 -- 05/18/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 77,428 120,908 43,480 104,185 f52.620) 2.446527%
05/19/92 -- 05/25/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 75,283 120,908 45,625 102,848 (53,957) 2.508680X
05/26/92 -- 06/01/92 9,513,625 8.010X 14,614 71,208 103,636 32,428 89,651 (44,754) 2.080781%
06/02/92 -- 06/05/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 66,275 120,908 54.633 - 109,090 f47,715) 2.218478%
06/09/92 -- 06/15/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 56,878 120,905 64.071 118,527 f>0,278) 1.779704%
06/16/92 -- 06/22/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 54,693 120,908 66,215 120,672 (36,133) 1.679982%
06/23/92 -- 06/29/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 55,122 120,908 65,736 105,671 I48,135) 2.237977%
06/30/92 -- 07/06/92 9,513,625 8.010X 14,614 47,401 120,908 73,508 115,363 IN,K2) 1.926513%
07/07/92 -- 07/13/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 39,036 120,908 81,873 123.728 (33,077) 1.537900%
07/14/92 -- 07/20/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 44,827 12D,908 76,082 117,514 (39,292) 1.926825%
07/21/92 -- 07/27/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 49,760 120,908 71,148 112,581 (44,225) 2.056185%
07/28/92 -- 08/03/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 48,902 103,636 54,734 95,468 f38,936) 1.810305%
OB/04/92 -- D8/10/92 9,513,625 8.01DX 14,614 49,331 120,905 71,577 112,312 (44,493) 2.066679X
08/11/92 -- 08/17/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 50,832 120,908 70,076 110,246 (46,560) 2.16475D%
08/18/92 -- 08/24/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 50,832 120.908 70,076 110,246 (46 560) 2.164750%
08/25/92 -• 08/31/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 55,122 103,636 48,514 88,306 (46:099) 2.143319X
D9/01/92 -- 09/07/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 58,933 120,90E 61,926 101,363 (55,442) 2.577740%
09/08/92 -- 09/14/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 61,127 120,908 59,781 99,218 (57,587) 2.677462%
D9/15/92 -- 09/21/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 63,916 120,908 56,993 96,136 (60.670) 2.820787%
09/22/92 -- 09/28/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 71,422 120,908 49,456 88,399 (68 406) 3.180494%
09/29/92 -- 10/05/92 9,513,625 8.010% 140614 72,924 120,903 47,984 86,898 (69:908) 3.250299%
10/06/92 -- 10/12/92 9,513,625 8.010% 14,614 53,192 120,908 67,717 1D6,630 (50,175) 2.332861%
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
- c1_096,087 a=S5_674,334 yS8-912,663 _$3,238,330 $9,639,910 ($1,918_881) _1_13"56%
MERRILL LYNCH 6 W. Dceft Rated
. . . ........ . .
f98,500.ODD 10/13/92
Cemty Senitetiae Districts of anew. Canty
CDPs -- CSPitel lWavenet Pro9rda
199a-92 Series C
.....................................
ESTIMATED SERIES C MET DEBT SERVICE TO DATE
A 9 C D E f 6 H 1 i IT L N
Interest Caste Imas.t EerniW
........................................... .....................................................................................................................................
Prfecipsl Outgtarellrg Prasaeh Ilrvested with FrenkliD Pmeels In ted with Fidelity Pracemis Irvestei with CaintY
........................................... ........................................... ........................................... ..............
Prircl Del An. Perledic DART IMomew Praeeede An. Periodic Ilmpeet Proceeds A,. Periodic Reinurowevet Avg. Wimlc
OuntaMiry Yield Service W Truss. Yield (1) Eernfngs W T.tee Yield (2) Eanins Mt. W Caleney Yield (3) Ignites
-- ---
09/01/92 -• 09/30/92 t93,500,00D 2.W% 5236,694 m "a,591 5.545% S1DS,1M S35,AA0,591 3.162E SW,M $10,499,y46 9.010E Sn.m
10/01/92 -• 10/13/92 90,500,000 2.304% 111,%? 35,4A0,591 5.222% n,1M W,AA0,591 3.162E 43,M5 10,499,746 9.010E 33,69A
..... ............ -_-.. ...... ............
010,6M SM7,36E $lit,1R S111,450
om==ms Mmeswev s® emmav®
(1) Avenge Yield Thragh acta0ar 13, 1992.
(2) Average Yield Thr-mh September 30, 19D2.
(3) Avenge Yield mro gh Septmber 30, 1992.
W/01/92 .. W/30/92
rU IL LYN"S W. Draft Dated
C90,SW,OW
Canty Supitalm Districts Tr spars Canty
COPS -- series leprm®ent PreSrr
1990.92 Series C
ESTIMATED WHEN C NET Wtt SERVICE W DATE -- PASE 2
N 0 P 0 R S
InvVatrrd Eamirys
..........................................................
Resern fud Eemir
•• Tetel Net
Invested A". Reserve Fund Imeatmrt (IM Lank)/ All-In
Ftrds Yield (2) Fidelity Eernlrya IM Eerairps TIC
................. .......... ............ ............ ............. ............
W,01M -- W/30/92 59,150,DW 3.162% M,392 SST0,A31 5141,T3D (y.Mt%F?%)
10/01/92 -- 10/13/92 9,930,M 3.1621 11,W2 5160,250 s1D,311 (4.1001631)
............ ............ ............ ............
t16,6W ssm'sW P220,OW •(S.M7161)
( I\ 30c
SUMMARY Of o YEAR SWAP ANALYSES
A 8 C D E F G H
SWAP PAYMENTS ACCRUED CSDOC POTENTIAL POTENTIAL AVERAGE
ANALYSIS MADE BY SWAP PAYMENTS NET PROF TI PROEITASSUMING PROFIT CURRENT J.J.KENNY
DATE CSDOC TO CSDOC TO DATE AVG. JJK to DATE ASSUMING J.J. KENNY M107181 TO
(D=B+q CURRENT JJK PRESENT
07AWN2 (3,230,023.16 4,381,63237 1,151AM.21 4,482,411.43 8,025,818.05 2.64% 4.14%
0211M (3,230,023.16 4,446,072.23 1,216,049.07 4,614,187.12 8246,679S3 2.55% 4.10%
QUM (3,484,37582 4,766,790.77 1,282,414.45 4,746,364.00 7,908,089.77 2.70% 4.06%
02f25/92 (3,484,375.82 4,829,94687 1,345571.05 4,950,745.29 8,332,8.59.17 2.52% 4.03%
OW/92 (3,485,29939 4,914,225.75 1,428,92.636 4,974,17230 8,862,50656 2.30% 4.00%
03/10/92 (3,485,29939 4,985,937.61 1,500,638.22 5,107,495.84 7,784,7b5.84 2.78% 3.96%
03/17/92 (3,711,876 5,273,959.94 1,562,08337 5,206,503.75 7,343,663.84 2.98% 3.93%
03/24/92 (3,711,876 5,331,127.04 1,619,250.47 5,277,77752 5,768,55554 3.69% 3.91%
03/31/92 (3,711,8765 5,355,835.23 1,643,958.66 5,289,244.46 6,415,969.16 3.39% 3.90%
04/07/92 (3,711,876 5,404,23231 102,355.74 5,35P12.54 6,445509.18 338% 388%
04/14/92 (4,0D7,60336 5,748,57051 1,740,967.15 5,389,095.20 6,062,261.69 3.56% 3.87%
04/21/92 (4,OD7,60336 5,795484.65 1,788,081.29 5,404,446.96 5A94284.78 3.74% 3.87%
04/28/92 (4,OD7,60336 5,836,596.02 1,828,992.66 5,409,022.06 5,366,402.66 3,M 3.87%
05/05/92 (4,OD7,60336 5,874,29852 1,866,695.16 5,41408.43 5,964,025.13 3.61% 3.87%
ON1M (4,00760336 5,886,78159 1,879,178.23 5,395,52558 6,232,751.13 3A7% 3.87%
05/19/92 (4,338,958.97 6,296,032.10 1,957,073.13 5,462,27557 6,188,205.07 351% 3.86%
05/26/92 (4,338958.9/ 6,341,862.69 2,002,903.71 5,496,551.45 6,585,74751 332% 3.85%
ONO2J92 (4,338,958.97 6,985,581.07 2,046,622.10 5,507,944.97 7,055,35859 3.09% 3.85%
0609/92 (4,A38,958.97 6,429,299.46 2,090,340.49 5,559,647.19 7,939,752.% 2.65% 3.83%
06/16/92 (4,661,636.06 6,816,20230 2,154,566.24 5,631,06536 8,148,530.24 255% 3.81%
0623/92 (4,661,636.06 6,882,567.13 2,220,931.07 5,703,829.19 8,118,110.84 257% 3.79%
06/30/92 (4,661,636.06 6,948,503.99 2,286,867.93 5,7701452 8,823,598.04 2.21% 3.77%
07/07/92 (4,661,636.06 7,022,141.03 2,360,504.97 5,868,281.24 9,589,237.27 1.82% 3.74%
07/14/92 (4,893,988.43 7,336,47257 2,442,484.14 5,973,210.76 9,081,785.28 2.09% 3.71%
07/21M (4,893,988.43 7,412,67655 2,518,688.12 6,052,186.82 8,654,81759 232% 3.69%
07/28,M (4,893,989.43 7,483,960.71 2,589,972.28 6,125,443.67 8,739,435.81 2.28% 3.67%
OW04/92 (4,893,988.43 7538,828.61 2,644,840.18 6,M,097.66 8,694,362.08 230% 3.64%
08/11/92 (4,893,998.43 7,61054023 2,716,551.80 6,271987.89 8,574,731.47 2.37% 3.62%
08/18/92 (5,097,09753 7,883,W25 2,786,766.72 6,323,348.71 8,583,844.41 2.37% 3.61%
0825/92 (5,097,09753 7,954,079.91 2,956,98238 6,386,940.41 8,22395939 257% 3.59%
09/01/92 (5,097,09753 8,002,74432 2,905,646.79 6,433503.82 7,716,W.92 2.85% 357%
09/08/92 (5,097,097,53 8,064,830.89 2,967,73336 6,475,058.46 7,726,415.66 2.85% 3.56%
09/15/92 (5,331,986.27 8,359,666.78 3,027,68051 6514,052.18 7,507,668.11 2.98% 3,55%
09/22/92 (5,331,%6 8,41034.29 3,084,848.02 6,549,844.19 6,911,958.72 3.33% 354%
09/29/92 (5,331,986.27 8,466,514.87 3,134528.60 6555,129.01 6,793,379.79 3.40% 3.54%
11V06/92 (5,331,986. 8,514,698.2D 3,182,711.93 6,598,076.00 8,347,819.17 2.487, 352%
10/13/92 (5,331,986. 8,5W60.83 3,250,574.56 6,643,26051 8,572,434.87 235% 351%
3 YEAR SWAP ANALYSIS
SUMMARY OF REVERSAL ANALYSES
A B C D
POTENTIAL CURREM' AVERAGE
ANALYSIS DATE REVERSAL PROW REVERSAL RATE 3 YEAR FD[ED PAYOR
5r1/91 to PRESENT
02118,92 2,551,319.52 4.46% 5.22%
MOM 2,234,773.08 4.58% 5.22%
03/03,92 2,154,656.68 4.60% 5.19%
0370i92 2,015,772.24 4.66% 5.17%
03117.92 1,511,506.21 487% 5.16%
0324/92 1,578,999.22 4.84% 5.14%
03/31,92 1,849,600.83 4.70% 5.14%
04107M 2,307,661.75 4.49% 5.12%
04/14/92 2,688X4.49 4.31% 5.10%
04/2102 2,441,426.07 4.42% 5.08%
04/2m 2,485,124.45 4.39% 5.06%
05/05,92 2,656,335.51 4.30% 5.05%
M202 2,664,237.92 4.29% 5.05%
05/19192 2,902,140.33 4.15% 5.01%
0526y2 2,335,258.47 4.42% 5.01%
06/02,92 2,506,474.80 4.32% 4.98%
06/09i92 2,681,691.12 4.22% 4.98%
06116/92 2,769,727.42 4.17% 4.96%
0623/92 2,725,148.56 4.18% 4.93%
0620/92 2,89703.66 4.09% 4.90%
07/07,92 3,278,899.33 3.88% 4.87%
07/14192 3,500,904.33 3.74% 4.84%
0721,92 3,754,981.00 3.59% 4.81%
072M 3,931,347.35 3.53% 4b0%
08/04,92 3,780,109.75 3.59% 4.80%
08/11g2 4,099,829.18 3A0% 4.8D%
MOM 4,130,021.19 3.36% 4.79%
08/25,92 4,047,120.53 3.38% 4.79%
09/01,92 4,055,298.77 3.31% 4.75%
09/08,92 4,558,783.21 3.01% 4.74%
09/15/92 4,441,265.90 3.05% 4.72%
09/mm 4,368,090.40 3.06% 4.69%
09/29,92 4,456,040.30 2.97% 4.68%
10106,92 4,787,898.20 3.02% 4.67%
10/13,92 4,028,903.29 3.15% 4.67%
CSDOC
3 Year Swap vs. Current Reversal Profits
PROFITS FOR THE PERIOD FROM 10/13/92 THROUGH THE TERMINATION DATE OF 05/07/94.
A B C D
Assumed Present Value Present Value Present Value Reversal
J.J. Kenny Avera a Potential Profits C& 4.67% Reversal Profits Difference
1.500% 6,767,558 4,028,903 2,738,654
2.000% 5,925,444 4,028,903 1,896,541
2.350% (1) 5,335,965 4,028,903 1,307,061
2.500% 5,083,331 4,028,903 1,054,427
3 000% 41241217 4 028 903 21 314
'' „"...,... 31sP.. 0 •I $, .': ,'tiQ�,$i90y3, fi,w.d=,.. 4,02$;9�13.`'t 'r�,C
3500% 3,399,104 4,028,903 (629,800)
4.000% 2,556,990 4,028,903 (1,471,913)
4.500% 1,714,877 4,028,903 (7,314,026)
5.000% 872,763 4,028,903 (3,156,140)
5.500% 30,650 4,028,903 (3,998,253)
6.000% (811,463) 4,028,903 (4,940,367)
6.500% (1,653,577) 4,028,903 (5,682,480)
7.000% (2,495,690) 4,028,903 (6,524,594)
(t)Cwren JJ.Kemyrnd"
(2)Cwren ReVe w Rate
10/13/92
Potential Earnings Summary
3-Year Series B SWAP
A B C D E F
Potential Potential Additional Additional Potential
Analysis Net Profit Total Profit At Total Profit At Profit At Profit At Reversal
Date To Date Average JJK Current JJK Avg JJK Curr JJK Profit
n.dud.a el cndudea In I C - B I I D - B I
Monthly Recaru
9/10/91 481,170 4,043,207 2,794,658 3,562,037 2,313,488 1,433,672
10/08/92 548,280 3,720,461 4,565,240 3,172,181 4,016,960 1,988,095
11/12/91 693,716 3,880,558 4,709,655 3,186,842 4,015,939 2,505,892
12/10/91 829,134 4,005,842 4,323,756 3,176,708 3,494,622 3,233,444
1/14/92 977,060 4,096,135 8,312,737 3,119,075 7,335,677 3,105,739
2/18/92 1,282,414 4,746,364 7,908,090 3,463,950 6,625,676 2,551,320
3/17/92 1,562,083 5,206,504 7,343,664 3,644,421 5,781,581 1,511,506
4114/92 1,740,967 5,389,095 6,062,262 3,648,128 4,321,295 2,688,224
5/19/92 1,957,073 5,462,275 6,188,205 3,505,202 4,231,132 2,902,140
6/16/92 2,154,566 5,631,065 7,148,530 3,476,499 4,993,964 2,769,727
7/14/92 2,442,484 5,973,211 9,081,785 3,530,727 6,639,301 3,500,904
'/18/92 2,786,767 6,323,349 8,583,844 3,536,582 5,797,077 4,130,021
�/l 5/92 3,027,681 6,514,052 7,507,668 3,486,371 4,479,987 4,441,265
Weekly Reoort:
9/22192 3,084,848 6,549,844 6,911,859 3,464,996 3,827,011 4,368,090
9129/92 3,134,529 6,555,129 6,793,380 3,420,600 3,658,851 4,456,040
10/06/92 3,182,712 6,598,076 8,347,819 3,415,364 5,165,107 4,287,898
10/13/92 3,250,574 6,643,260 8,572,435 3,392,686 5,321,861 4,028,903
SWAP 1.XLS 4:29 PM
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
& ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
tOBCC ELLIS AVENUE
oa 9UM 6127
October 21 , 1992
FIX1M11N VALLEY CALIFORNIA 92126.8127
014)962-2411
REFUNDING CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION
Tracking of the SWAP Interest Rate
Date Rate
4/29/92 5.80%
5/6/92 5.70%
6/10/92 5.70%
9/9/92 5.30%
9/23/92 5.30%
10/6/92 5.23%
10/8/92 5.30%
10/13/92 5.35%
10/15/92 5.45%
10/20/92 5.55%
Proposed SWAP Interest Rate Target Ceiling: 5.60%
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
• October 15, 1992
t o9AA Fuls AVENUE
vn Box Blz>
FOONfAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA 92728.B127
`a✓ mA�9Bz.zan
STAFF REPORT
Review of Construction Contract
Change Order Practices
I. PREFACE AND SUMMARY
Change orders are an integral part in the construction of any project.
It matters not whether the project is a highway, a battleship, an
office building, a space vehicle, a sewage treatment plant or, perhaps
something that everyone can relate to a little easier, the design and
building of a personal residence. The fact is, it' s virtually
impossible to build anything without some changes.
Why is this? Why can' t a project be designed and built without the
need to make changes? There are several reasons. Some of the major
ones are: (a) actual field or site conditions vary from what was
anticipated (this is a frequent cause) ; (b) for a variety of reasons
the owner (the person or entity for whom the project is being
constructed) decides that a change is desirable, i.e. , new information
becomes available, or a change in need from what was originally
envisioned takes place between the original planning phase and the
construction phase; or that a change would better accommodate a future
event, or sometimes it simply looks and is different once it starts to
be erected than it was envisioned or looked like on paper, etc; (c)
or it is determined that it won't work, be as efficient,
or be as safe as originally thought; (d) sometimes changes are
"planned," for example, when a specific piece of equipment to be
installed is not known until after the project is bid; and (e) human
errors are made.
Most of the Sanitation Districts projects are considerably different
than typical public works jobs such as roads, buildings, water, storm-
water, and sewer. The nature of our sewage treatment facilities,
currently a more than $1 billion complex, is becoming increasingly
sophisticated, consisting of advanced electro-mechanical facilities
with bio-chemical processes. The fact that we must modify or
construct new facilities and concurrently operate and maintain the
treatment plants in compliance with a host of regulatory and other
requirements, complicates and exacerbates the design, construction and
coordination efforts required, and increases the potential for change
orders on our huge public works projects.
Nobody likes to have to make changes--for any reason. Nonetheless, we
have to acknowledge that they are inevitable. That doesn't mean we
have to unequivocally accept the fact, but we do have to realize that
they will occur and deal with them, one at a time, as best we can. It
is important to note that the Districts' change order experience
compares favorably with other agencies.
P
Every owner establishes policies and procedures to meet their
particular needs for addressing change orders. Because very few
people have experience in massive, complex construction programs like
the Sanitation Districts, the issue of change orders is often
misunderstood. The purpose of this report is to help provide a better
understanding of the Districts' change order polices and practices,
and the reasons therefor.
II. BACKGROUND
Change order management is an integral part of managing construction
contracts responsible for building the Districts' collection,
treatment and disposal facilities. While some change orders are
planned for in the design process, most are not. Change orders arise
for a variety of reasons. Staff has prepared this report to review
the construction contract change order practices of the County
Sanitation Districts, and review typical projects completed by the
Districts, comparing our record and results with that experienced by
others. For these reasons, this report includes a review of the
Districts' design process and the staff that performs this work.
This agency has historically contracted most of its design engineering
services with private consulting engineering firms, with the
Districts' design staff managing the design work including plan
review. This practice is believed to be the most efficient and
cost-effective way because is avoids the build up of a big staff and
the policy has been periodically reviewed and sustained by the Boards.
Many large sewering agencies, such as the Los Angeles Sanitation
Districts and the City of Los Angeles, have large, in-house design
staffs which prepare plans and specifications. While these agencies
also use private consultants to prepare plans and specifications, the
consultants are mainly used to shave peak work loads. CSDOC has a
very small staff and we prepare plans and specifications only for
emergencies or very unique projects.
CSDOC design staff manages the design and construction of the
projects, secures permits and approvals, and provides overall
compliance of the projects with the Master Plan, EIRs and regulatory
directives. Total expenditures for capital projects currently ranges
between $80 and $100 million annually. However, our design staff of
seven professional architects and engineers cannot perform in-depth
quality assurance program on all these plans. For these reasons,
quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) requirements are
included in all design contracts with outside consultants.
III. CHANGE ORDERS
Change orders are a normal part of any large, complex construction
project. Change orders are extremely useful for changing contract
goals and for managing all Districts' work to maintain operation of
the sewerage facilities with the greatest reliability, economy and
safety.
-2-
Background
Many steps are involved in preparing and managing a Sanitation
Districts construction project. General planning begins with forecast
needs based on (a) flow increases and (b) regulatory requirements.
General planning leads to the preparation of a Master Plan which
identifies and schedules planned projects over a particular period of
time. The Sanitation Districts' 1989 Master Plan identifies projected
new construction and replacement projects for facilities expansion and
Improvement through the year 2020 totaling $1.5 billion.
The design of each project starts with the Engineering design staff
preparing a scope of work by Engineering design staff with concurrence
from Maintenance and Operations staff. This scope of work is used to
solicit proposals from qualified consultants who then provide the
following:
° Feasibility Studies
° Project Report
° Plans and Specifications
° Construction Assistance
o Shop Drawing and Submittal Review
° Training
• Start-up Assistance
° Preparation of Operation and Maintenance Manuals.
Types of Change Orders
Approximately 80% of the consultant's work involves the preparation of
the plans and specifications. The remaining work includes providing
assistance during the construction period and preparing the other
items noted above. For most Districts projects ranging from $5 to $35
million, this process can take many years. Frequently, the time
period between project inception to start-up of the facilities can be
as long as eight to ten years. In between, circumstances can occur or
be discovered which can lead to changes, not all of which can be made
without change orders. There are many types or categories of change
orders including:
° Design errors. Design errors generally result from mistakes between
different sections of the contract documents which conflict with
each other or documents that fail to correctly incorporate existing
as-built information.
• Design omissions. Certain work necessary to complete the
construction is omitted from the contract documents.
• Changed regulatory requirements. Sometimes changes are made during
construction to comply with the latest standards and .codes.
° Work added by Staff. Sometimes, since the construction work takes
place several years after the design, additional needs or improved
configurations are identified by staff during the construction
phase.
-3-
r
Other work not directly related to the project may need to be done
because it is most economical to complete with onsite contractors,
equipment and labor.
Certain changes may be made to accommodate ongoing or future
construction identified after the plans and specifications were
completed.
° Emergency mer work. Frequently the construction crews are utilized
during egencies to repair Districts' facilities or do other work
not directly related to the contract. This can be very economical
since move-in/move-out costs can be avoided if necessary equipment
is available onsite.
Unidentified obstructions. Most frequently these are underground
obstructions in streets or within the treatment plants, i .e. ,
underground pipes and/or structures not known to exist at the time
of design.
° Bonuses and penalties. To facilitate early start-up or penalize
late completion.
° Changes to suit equipment. Our designers are required to
a Ccommotlate several manufacturers (two minimum) for equipment.
Sometimes, accepted low bid equipment requires accommodation
changes. Allowing multiple equipment manufacturers to bid results
In overall cost reduction.
° Adtliti ons for other a encies. Frequently, other public agencies
and sometimes private ask us to perform added work for which they
reimburse the Districts.
Appendix 1 gives a more detailed overview of change order types; and
Appendix 2, which has been extracted from the General Provisions of
the Districts' Plans and Specifications, details payment procedures
for extra work.
Construction
Although there are occasional errors and omissions, the Districts'
facilities are well designed and well built. The bottom line is that
the Districts facilities effectively perform the necessary function
they were intended to perform and enable the Districts to meet
regulatory requirements. The Districts have never received a
violation of their NPDES permit as a result of construction
deficiencies. The Districts' facilities do not fail with the
frequency that many agencies experience because of the unique blend of
talents brought to each project by Districts' engineering, operations
and maintenance personnel and the experienced consultants who perform
the design work and provide construction support.
Treatment Projects
The Districts' wastewater facilities' construction projects are unique
when compared to most other public works and general construction
-4-
projects. The Districts' facilities construction or modification
projects must be integrated into the existing treatment plants in a
manner that will not interrupt the ongoing operations and treatment of
sewage. This is an extremely difficult task to orchestrate. Staff
must be assured that the hydraulic (flow) demands on our system will
be met and that we are able to maintain process efficiency and control
at all times so that we continue to meet the NPDES ocean discharge
permit standards for protecting the ocean and air quality. We cannot
allow the treatment plants to shut down and cause us to violate
environmental standards. As a result, we must often make special
accommodations in managing our construction program. In doing this,
we have been very successful ; as stated before, we have never received
an NPDES permit violation.
Within this context, construction of major public works facilities by
this agency and others requires the ability to respond to field
changes in the most expeditious and economical method. Change orders
are a normal , important element of any construction contract. It
would be unusual for a major construction contract to be completed
without some deviation from the original documents.
Table A shows the source of change orders for each of the four jobs
the Directors asked to be reviewed. Note that the percentage of
actual design omissions and errors is very small in relation to the
project's total cost and within ranges well within industry standards.
While staff, consultants and the contractors would all prefer
error-free jobs, design omissions and errors do not usually represent
a large part of the total project cost.
It must also be recognized that each of our treatment projects is very
�✓ unique in terms of what are generally considered typical public works
jobs; i.e. , roads, buildings and water, stormwater and sewers. They
are often the first of a kind, and not repeat projects. They are very
complex, and encompass hundreds of drawings and pages of
specifications. Changes that are not (and sometimes cannot be)
anticipated in design, are made during construction.
The change-order program is a management tool necessary for total
project implementation. Because of the large volume ($80-$100 million
per year) of wastewater facilities' construction work, the Directors
are presented each month with a variety of change orders.
Determination of Value (Change Order Management Procedures)
The General Provisions of the Districts' construction specifications,
which establish the procedural parameters for the issuance of change
orders (Appendix 2) , are designed to keep total project costs to a
minimum. Most change orders are based on the following:
Labor: State rates, plus insurance, plus 15% for overhead
and profit.
Materials: Cast plus 15% for overhead and profit.
Equipment: State rates (50% of State rates for standby).
�J
-5-
TABLE A
Analysis of Reasons for Change Orders
Submitted to September 9, 1992 Board
..........
........ ......... ..... .... ...... ....... ..........
.... . .. .......... ...............
................................. ...... .........
.. .......
. ...........
............................................................. ... . ... .................................................................
........m.
zT
O AM
w
.
PERCENT : PERCENTS VORKNOT
MUTRACT UNDIMMEDce st
:CQaPLETE - co-
.... ..................................-..
........ .. ........ ..........................�%,.; RELATE D...... ................ . .........
BYRMNER 40MMON5
PAN fAcluTIES CHAMES
To PosTRAO
J-17 100% $7,090,000 14.99% 3.69%M 1.36% 8.98% 0.76% 0.30%
J-19-1 92% $16.410,855 3.90% 0.31% 0,86% 0.31% 0.62% 1.80%
PI.34-3
J-21 99% $27,205,378 212% 0.19% 1.30% 0.22% 0.28% 0133%
Pl.35-2
P2-42-1 91% $9,369,000 1.72% 0.00% 0.260/6 0.42% 0.70% 0.34%
Compared to a 1992 survey of 17 large California contracting agencies
reported in the August 1992 Civil Engineering magazine, the Districts'
profit and overhead markups are the lowest.
The Districts' change order policy, as defined by the General
Provisions, does not provide a bonanza for contractors. There is a
commonly held perception, probably from the aerospace industry, that
contractors bid low hoping to recoup and make huge profits on change
orders. This is not possible under the Districts' change order
procedures. At best, the change order policies provide a measure to
avoid losses and lawsuits which could arise from changed conditions.
Our contractors would much prefer not to have change orders.
Sometimes, work done under change orders costs less than bid prices
would normally generate. This is because bidders generally add a
certain amount of contingency in their bids to account for unknown
site conditions; such a contingency is not needed by the contractor,
who is already familiar with the site, as part of his change order
price. At the Districts, this has been proven by adding work under
change orders to existing contracts when solicitation of public bids
produced costs that staff believed were excessive.
Determining the amount a consultant should be charged for extra work
because of a change order is also a very difficult task. If an
omitted work item is added under change order, it can logically be
argued that the consultant did not create extra costs for the
Districts if, in fact, adding the omitted work is done at the same
cost as it would have been had it been bid. For this reason, in many
contracts the Districts bid work under unit prices, and if additional
work is done, it is paid at the bid unit price.
Districts' staff supports and follows a policy to resolve change
orders as quickly as possible. For this reason, the Directors see
monthly change orders on their agenda. The Districts' conduct the
largest public works program within Orange County, requiring capital
expenditures of between $80-$100 million a year for contracts
involving the collection, treatment plant and disposal facilities.
While expeditious resolution of change orders requires that Directors
and staff take more frequent actions and spend more time on change
order analyses, the policy is one of the most effective management
tools to control change order pricing. It avoids the "growth" of
change orders over time and late claims for delays and extended
overhead when projects do not proceed on schedule. As the Directors
will note from a review of the change orders, most of them seek to
avoid time extensions, and it is very rare indeed that extended
overhead charges are allowed. This can be attributed to the
management practice of paying for changes when they are identified.
The Districts' change orders contain one of the following statements
to avoid future "growth".
"The additional work contained within this Change Order can be
performed incidental to the prime work and within the time
allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the
Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change
-6-
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will
be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted and
approved by this Change Order."
or:
"The additional work contained within this Change Order can be
performed incidental to the prime work and within the time
allotted for the original Contract and any extensions to the
Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that days extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but
that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs,
expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by
Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this
Change Order."
Many agencies do not take all change orders to the governing board
but, instead, grant staff authorization to issue change orders up to a
certain amount (typically $10,000 to $50,000) and only require
change orders over that amount to be approved by the board. In fact,
such a policy has been suggested by the Directors in the past on
several occasions but staff has always resisted it. Staff believes
that there is a certain discipline that is brought to the entire
change order process by requiring all change orders to be approved by
the Boards and will continue to support that practice.
IV. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
The Districts' staff would prefer fobs to be completed without change
orders, particularly those change orders that result from errors and
omissions. Our design consultants share this concern. Change orders
do not benefit our contractors and certainly are not a convenient
means of managing the work.
However, it can be safely said that no amount of effort will -
completely eliminate changes on extremely complex jobs nor will extra
effort completely eliminate errors and omissions. Because the
Districts' small design management staff is not able to provide the
full plan check review that some other agencies are providing, we do
have a quality assurance program in our design contracts. Our
contract documents include the following requirements.
Excerpt from the Request for Proposals:
"E. ENGINEER CONSULTANT shall maintain in full force and effect
standard industry form professional negligence errors and
omissions insurance coverage for the benefit of itself and
DISTRICT in an amount of not less than One Million Dollars
($1,000,000), in accordance with the provisions of this
paragraph. If the policy of insurance is written on a
-7-
'claims made' basis, said policy shall be continued in full
force and effect at all times during the term of this
Agreement and for a period of five (5) years from the date
of the completion of the engineering services hereunder. In
the event of termination of said policy, ENGINEER CONSULTANT
shall obtain continuing insurance coverage for the benefit
of DISTRICT for the prior acts or omissions of ENGINEER
CONSULTANT during the course of performing services under
the terms of this Agreement. Said coverage shall be
evidenced by either a new policy evidencing no gap in
coverage, or by obtaining separate extended 'tail ' coverage
with the present or new carrier.
"In the event the present policy of insurance is written on
an 'occurrence' basis, said policy shall be continued in
full force and effect during the term of this Agreement and
for a period of five (5) years following the completion of
the services provided for in this Agreement. In the event
of termination of said policy, new coverage shall be
obtained for the required period to insure for the prior
acts of ENGINEER CONSULTANT during the course of performing
services under the terms of this Agreement.
"ENGINEER CONSULTANT shall provide to DISTRICT a certificate
of insurance in a form acceptable to DISTRICT indicating the
deductible or self-retention amounts and the expiration date
of said policy, and shall provide renewal certificates
within ten (10) days after expiration of each policy term.
"ENGINEER CONSULTANT shall be responsible for and shall
defend and hold harmless and indemnify DISTRICT and all its
officers, agents and employees from all costs and claims for
damages to real or personal property to any third party
resulting from the intentional misconduct or negligence of
ENGINEER CONSULTANT, its employees or its agents, in
relation to the rendition of services pursuant to this
Agreement."
Excerpt from the Scope of Work:
"QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA)
"The Consultant shall administer a program of QA procedures
for producing quality work. Specific procedures shall
cover, but not be limited to, planning, coordination,
checking, reviewing, and scheduling the work.
"All documents prepared by the Consultant shall be subject
to the Consultant's in-house procedures prior to submittal
to the Districts for review. Each submittal shall be
accompanied by a written statement from the
principal-in-charge of the project stating that the
documents being submitted have been checked.
-8-
"Discipline checks shall be made of all design calculations,
drawings, specifications, construction cost estimates, and
reports. An integrated design review shall be performed for
multidisciplinary documents to provide coordination and
avoid conflicts In the documents. Checking shall be
performed by qualified individuals who are not directly
involved in the design or supervision of the work."
Professional societies have been most concerned about errors and
omissions and have developed standards and guidelines. The American
Institute of Architects, in their "Handbook of Professional
Practices", sets this standard of quality (the American Society of
Civil Engineers has similar language):
"Law sets a standard for the performance of architects and indeed
all professionals--a standard of reasonable care. ..In
performing professional services, the law requires the architect
to use ordinary care and skill . Specifically, the architect is
required to do what a reasonably prudent architect would do in the
same community and be in the same time frame given the same or
similar facts and circumstances."
The architect' s guidelines go on to state that,
"Physicians are not required to guarantee a return to good health
or lawyers an acquittal . Similarly, architects are not legally
required to guarantee that a building will function perfectly,
that its roof will not leak or that the lowest bid will be within
budget."
The guidelines also add,
"Even though the the law sets a standard of reasonable care for
professionals, project participants often come to the bargaining
table with differing expectations. Many clients do not understand
that architects are neither able nor required to perform perfectly
(emphasis added). No amount of effort, care and consciousness on
the architect's part can foresee every aspect of transforming a
design on paper into reality."
Professional designers are dedicated and make every effort to do the
very best job they can, but this alone will not eliminate errors and
omissions. The Districts' construction program involves the creation
of custom-made products in the field. Change orders are necessary
when foundation, materials, weather, design problems, fabrication and
erection difficulties dictate some deviation from the original plan
defined by the contract documents. Recent changes required as a
result of errors and/or omissions have not been excessive. Table B,
which details the change orders on four recently completed,
non-related projects designed by four separate consultants, indicates
our recent track record regarding errors and omissions.
Staff has attempted to gather information from other agencies on
frequency of change orders, amount of changes and, particularly,
information regarding change orders as a result of errors and
omissions. Table C gives the following results of a recent random
survey of agencies willing to share their change order experience.
-9-
TABLE
Recent CSDOC Construction Projects
I............ . .... .........
......... 31GINAL. OTAL%
. ........... .................................
... ..... ....
.......... ........
..............................
.................... ................. ..........
.. .........DOWAACTNO TOR
.................- . .........
......... .......... . ....-
P no N --COMMA T 090MIE
.... ......................--............ �.. M� -1--l-I...........
.........................--- --.. ..
..... ......... .................... ............... .......... ........... -...... .........-. ....... .......... ...........................
....... GRANOEIME11--
.. ....... ............... .. ... .........
.......... .. ......
. .........
0.06%due to early completion bonus.
P11-20/1`11-31 Headworks No.2 $31,458,000 7.73% 2.37% 2.22%due to untoreseen soils and
I foundation conditions.
2.71%due to untoreseen subsudece
PI-33 Primary Clarifiers $39,657,000 6.62% 1.14% soils condition.
No.6.15 1.54%due to added work by other
agencies.
New 0.83%due to an undisclosed utilities.
J-23-1 Operation& Maintenance $3,675,000 4.44% 1.18% 0.89%due to changes required by other
Building agencies.
7-11-1 Pump Station 3.48%due to changes requested by
7-11-2 Abandonment& RelDcations $3,104,348 6.56% 0.02% 1 local agencies.
7-11.3 1.96%due to untoresearl obstructions.
TABLE C
CHANGE ORDER
AGENCY EXPERIENCE I 1
California Department of Corrections 3% for same design. `a•✓
5-10% for custom design.
California Water Resources Control 5% allowance for work
Board related to project.
Environmental Protection Agency 5% allowance for work
related to project.
LACSD 'In-house' design For projects over $1
million, 4.66%.
Corps of Engineers, Portland District About 10%.
CALTRANS About 7%.
LA Department of Sanitation About 9%.
LA Department of Harbors About 10%.
CSDOC 5.24%*
*Average of last 12 plant projects, with value of $207 million,
Including new construction and rehabilitation projects. See attached
Table D.
It has been our practice that should the added cost of an errors and
omissions change order exceed the added value, the consultant is asked
to reimburse the Districts the difference. For example, if the error
results in removal of completed work, the value of the work removed
would be charged to the designer. If it requires added work, some
portion of the added cost would be charged to the designer.
The Districts' overall experience seems to compare favorably with
other agencies doing large public works projects for total change
orders executed, including errors and omissions.
V. DESIGN DIVISION STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES
All construction projects share fundamental objectives. First, the
projects must be functional , i.e., designed and built to serve their
intended purpose. Assuming that function can be carried out, the
second is the total project cost. These costs include the following
items:
-10-
�ABLE D
Change Order Summary
of Recent Plant Projects
.......... ...... ...... ................ -4v�. ................ .-................. ............. ...........
.................... ...............-................ . .... .......... .. . . ... .. ...... ....................... .... ............
............. ..........
.. ........... .... ......
..... .. .. . .. ....
........ .......................................... Q
. ..................... -- -.-- : . ....................... .......................................
.... ..... ......... .......... . ......... .. ..%QQ..............
...........
.............. 70744.
ARlfJECT ... ....... ..................
.......
.............d4BN ......... ...... .......... ......
.. .......... .. E
..................... MW�OSTX -........................ .... ........ -....... .............. .................8EG ...... . .................................
....... ..... ..... . ........
CLO .1.... .......... .......... - * -i "' VWL
.... .........- .............. ........ ..
........ .............. .. ........:
.........................-.. Mits
............... ........... . ................................. ......... C A
............................ .. .....................1-1......=.- ........ ..-- --%�. .....................I.........................-..... ..............................-. ....... .......... ...... . ............ .........
.....................-.....-.-..... ......... .................... ...... ................. . .... ..
..... ......... ........... .....
....... ...... .... ............ . ........ ......
........ ........ ... ... ........ ......... ............. ............... ...........-.........I............... .. .... .............
..................... ... ......... ......... ---------
..........................
PI.20 $31.458,000 7.73% 1.15% 2,2P% 1.99% 2.37%
PI.21 $4.618.000 3.63% 0.00% 0.44% G39% 2.80%
P1-33 $39,657,000 6.62% 1.25% 2.71% 1.52% 1,14%
P1-34-1 $13,098,000 4.52% 0.85% 0.43% 2.06% 1.18%
PI-34-2 $19,085.000 5.58% 1.38% 0.82% 1.16% 2.22%
PI-34-3 $27,206,378 2,32% 0.19% 1.30% 0.22% 0.61%
P2-28-1 $3,747,747 3.99% 0.00% 0.61% 0.63% 2.76%
P2-37 $5,395,000 11A8% 0.18% 2.79% 0.85% 7.35%
P242-1 $9.369,000 1,72% O.OD% 0.26% 0.42% 1.04%
J-15 $18,476243 3.85% 0.87% 1.68% 0.59% 0.71%
J-1 9-1 $15,410,855 3.90% • 0.31% 0,86% 0.31% 2.42%
J-19-2 $19.753.000 8.61% • 1.15% 1.78% 3.28%
TOTAL $207,273,223 4-�i
AVERAGE 5.30% 0.61% 1.38% 0.99% 2.32%
STILL UNDER CONSTRUCTION
o Consultant charges for design
• Staff charges for design management
e Construction bid price
a Staff charges for construction management
• Change orders.
These costs, to some degree, can be changed by increasing one cost to
decrease another. For instance, change orders could hopefully be
reduced if staff allocated more resources to plan checking or if
additional staff were hired to do plan checking or if some form of
value engineering is undertaken. Appendix 3 provides a breakdown of
the Engineering Department's Planning and Design Division.
Districts' staff averages between two and three hours of plan checking
for each 100 hours of consultant design time, low compared to other
agencies. For example, one agency we are aware of has one hour of
staff time for every five hours of consultant's time.
The largest part of the workload assigned to the Planning and Design
Division includes management of the preparation of contract documents
for all collection system, treatment and disposal projects designed by
consultants. Additional functions include the staff work necessary
for the acquisition of required easements, projects by developers,
annexations, EIR activities for all public agency projects within the
Districts' service area, permitting activities, review approvals of
design plans for tract sewers, connections to Districts' facilities by
others, and various administrative, illustrative, and graphics work.
Staff, generally, does not prepare plans and specifications unless the
project is of smaller size or emergency in nature. Although the emergency
projects, of which there are about one-half dozen per year, are
generally bid within staff authority, i.e. , under $25,000, each year
staff prepares plans and specifications for two or three projects
larger than that amount which require Board approval.
Thus, the main activity within our Planning and Design Division is the
preparation of the large contracts for plant and collection works.
These projects include the addition of new facilities improvements,
repair and rehabilitation of older facilities, and treatment expansion
facilities. Paralleling this work is the preparation of the necessary
master-planning documents which is continuous. These documents become
the blueprint for the future sewerage works. Planning activity has
been paramount in the Planning and Design Division' s workload. This
planning activity has been most successful , to wit the Districts have
never received an .NPDES violation because of inadequate or
non-existent facilities.
Each design contract is managed by a Districts' staff project engineer
within the Planning and Design Division of the Engineering Department.
The staff engineer is generally managing between 5 and 15 projects at
any one time, depending on the size of the projects, as shown in
Appendix 3. The in-house responsibilities include review of the
consultant's design effort, obtaining review from affected operating
departments within the Districts' organization, and securing the
necessary permits for the project from the South Coast Air Quality
Management District, County and cities, federal and state agencies, �..✓
-11-
e
the Coastal Commission, the Division of Industrial Safety, and others.
Most projects have between 50 and 300 sheets of plans and hundreds of
pages of detailed specifications.
�...J Plans are reviewed to ensure the best utility information available.
All plans are transmitted to utility companies, including power,
telephone, cable, gas, oil , water and local sewering agencies as well
as others for review. Reviews are made at both the preliminary and
final stages.
Although the staff overseas and monitors the consulting design
engineers' work, our historical practice and staffing levels do not
provide for a detailed review of the consultants' designs. To do so
would be counter to the Directors' philosophy of minimizing staff and
hiring consultants on an as-needed basis to do the design work.
After design is completed and plans and specifications are approved by
the Boards of Directors, the project is advertised for bids pursuant
to the Boards' procurement policy and applicable state laws. During
this phase, contractors comments and questions are evaluated and
frequently, addenda are issued to clarify questions that arise.
The entire design process described above results in a set of plans
and specifications with the best information reasonably available and
prepared in a cost-effective manner. This set of documents is then
considered complete with all known ambiguities answered and is ready
for bidding.
In some circumstances, better information could be obtained, but the
cost may not be beneficial to the total project cost and, thus, the
planned use of change orders is an integral part of the design stage
to minimize total project cost. An example of this is the preparation
of plans and specifications for trunk sewer construction projects.
Information regarding existing utilities is gathered from owners and
placed on the plans in the locations indicated. Unfortunately, such
information is always less than perfect. When it appears that the
utility is close to the proposed location of a sewer conduit, staff
will hire contractors to excavate and determine the utility's exact
location. -The downside of advance excavation is extra move-in/move-out costs and
inconvenience to motorists. Unless a utility has the high potential
for conflict, the practice has been to solve the conflict problem when
the contract is in progress via change order, rather than expose each
and every utility prior to the start of construction. Staff believes
that this is an economical policy.
VI. SELECTION OF DESIGN CONSULTANT
The Districts' long-standing policy has been to minimize staffing
levels within the Engineering Department as shown in Appendix 3.
Accordingly, the Districts contract with consultants for the design of
most major projects. (Minor projects, especially projects with a high
degree of urgency, are designed in-house.)
-12-
A design contract starts when staff prepares a scope of work outlining !
the services requested. The scope must be general in nature yet
specific enough to allow the consultants to prepare a design proposal
fee estimate.
Design contracts are awarded in accordance with a procurement policy
approved by the Boards of Directors (Selection and Procurement of
Engineering and Architectural Services) . Proposals are generally
requested from three or more qualified firms. Sometimes, specialized and
continuation services are negotiated sole source.
The Requests for Proposals require that the consultant respond to the
Scope of Work by outlining an approach to the design, information on
the design team, and the maximum charge. The Directors authorize the
Selection Committee to review the proposals and negotiate a fee for
consideration of awarding a design agreement by the full Board(s).
The professional services agreement is generally awarded to the firm
with the lowest fee proposal . (It should be noted that, based on State
laws, many public agencies do not use consultant fees as the basis
for awarding professional contracts. Fees are negotiated following
selection of the consultant, based solely on qualifications.) Upon
receipt of the Selection Committee' s recommendation, the Directors
award a professional services agreement and the design begins.
Completion of a District project involves many consultants. For
instance, in most cases soils consultants are hired separately to
provide soils and foundation material information for the design
engineers. The construction includes surveyors, also hired by
separate bidding. Finally, testing services are provided by labs,
also through the bidding process. Bidding of each of these components
assures the Districts the lowest cost for these items of work, but
leads to more complicated project management for Districts' staff.
Conflicts and misunderstandings can arise which the Districts staff
note as an error or omission should a change order be necessary to
resolve the problem. One might think that agencies that have both
design and plan check may be able to avoid some of these difficulties,
however our investigations show that does not appear to be the case.
Districts' consultants know that to receive a request for proposal
they must do quality work and when errors or omissions occur, assist
In their resolution without compensation. If the added value of the
change is less than the added costs, reimbursement of the difference
from the consultant may be appropriate.
Because of the anticipation of reduced initial costs and other reasons
considered to be in the best public interest, by state law public
works construction contracts are awarded to the lowest, bondable
bidder. This provision itself increases the risk of disagreements and
conflicting interpretations of the contract documents which, like most
communication devices, are not perfect. In fact, the very nature of a
low bid forces the low bidder to look for possible conflicts which can
lead to changes.
The design process has to be an efficient and cost-effective
communication tool . "Cost-effectiveness" of a design document, while
not easily measured, simply means that the engineering effort devoted �.✓
-13-
to producing a set of contract documents has to stop at a point beyond
1 which further "perfection" or strengthening of these documents makes
no economic sense. Because of this economic reality, all construction
cost estimates set aside a certain amount for contingencies (or change
orders) during construction. While a considerable amount of
engineering work is done during the design phase, not all
contingencies can be predicted nor all ambiguities removed to
completely eliminate the possibility of errors or omissions being
discovered during construction. For this reason, project engineering
is less than fully complete at the end of the design phase and some of
the engineering effort must go into making final refinements during
the construction phase. These refinements, made in the field, in
conjunction with the on-going construction and based on the then known
construction constraints, are much more cost effective than any
attempt to produce a perfect design. It is not simply a matter of
paying twice for the same service, but one of cost effectiveness and
efficiency in the allocation of resources where they provide the most
value in completing the job. The cost of a so-called "perfect"
design, which could not in any event be achieved, would be unbearable
and unattainable for any owner.
VII. CONCLUSION
In summary, while the change order costs are understandably difficult
to bear, the reality of any construction project which brings together
entities with competing interests (owner and contractor) are: 1) the
contract documents will inevitably contain errors, omissions,
conflicts and ambiguities because of virtual impossibility of
achieving perfection; 2) such errors, omissions and ambiguities can be
reduced but not eliminated, and then only through the commitment of
disproportionate additional costs to the design process; and 3) that
such resources are generally more efficiently allocated to the
resolution of the problems as they arise during construction.
Our change order record compares favorably with that experienced by
other agencies.
TMD:jt
ENG/TMG:SR4
-14-
APPENDIX 1
DISCUSSION OF CHANGE ORDERS BY TYPES
1. Work Not Directly Related to the Contract
This is always add-on work to the contract for either emergency or
other reasons.
A. Emergency. Occasionally the need for emergency repair work arises
unexpectly when contractors are already at work on the site and in
the vicinity. This type of work is assigned to the contractors
with the best labor and equipment pool immediately available to do
the work.
B. Non-Emergency. In most cases this is maintenance or
operation-oriented work deemed by staff to be desirable to
accommodate ongoing treatment plant operations. The work is
assigned to a construction contract to avoid potential conflicts
caused by bringing other contractors into the construction
contract work area, and to avoid the additional charge of
move-in/move-out that would be incurred if a new contractor is
brought in. The most pressing reason is to avoid delays or
conflicts with the construction contract in progress since claims
for overhead extensions would result.
Completion of this type of work could possibly be delayed to avoid
the issuance of change orders. However, delay often may adversely
affect operation of treatment and disposal systems, may cause
additional inconvenience by doubling move-in both within the plant
or to the motoring public, and may not result in any total project
savings.
In most cases, staff believes that this work cannot be done at lower
cost through bidding since the use of on-site contractor's labor and
equipment eliminates the high charges associated with separate
contractors, such as contract documents, formal plans and
specifications, move-in and move-out.
2. Undisclosed Utilities
Undisclosed utilities represent a significant number of change orders
and change order items. However, as a percentage of the total
project, our experience has been that the changes are not excessive.
Undisclosed facilities conflicts are generally caused by incomplete
records of facilities built long ago. In the treatment plant, the
as-builts belong to the Districts; in the collection system, they
belong to the cities and the many public and licensed operators, i.e. ,
utilities.
1-1
Construction of facilities has been continuous in Fountain Valley Y
since the early 1920's and within the Huntington Beach plant since
1952. Undisclosed facilities are encountered because as-built
information is sometimes poor on older records.
Several factors affect the designers ability to secure correct data,
including the availability of good as-built plans and the effort
placed to secure the information. The professional engineering
services procurement method leads, perhaps indirectly, to problems
with undisclosed utilities. Designers know they must be very
competitive to obtain Districts contracts and rely on as-built
information provided by the Districts and/or local agencies or utility
owners and do not allocate resources for independent and exhaustive
searches. However, overall , total project costs, i.e., the sum of
consulting design and construction management costs, construction and
change orders may not be adversely affected.
To improve the treatment plant utility information produced from past
and future projects, staff has been developing recommendations that
will soon come before the Boards that include additional staff to
beter record as-built information and a computer-assisted design (CAD)
system to log plant utilities. This will not entirely resolve the
problem of undisclosed utilities/facilities since many facilities have
been in the ground thirty years or more, but the problem can be
eventually minimized.
3. Design Changes
In this category are two subcategories which may be broadly classified
as (a) changes desired and identified after the contract is in place,
and (b) design errors. A good analogy for design changes is the
addition of a room to a house. Once under construction, new ideas
emerge and are incorporated into the work, generally at extra cost.
a. Changed Conditions. The majority of design changes are the result
of new information such as changed conditions or operational plans
identified after design. Construction of a major facility is
generally an 8- to 10-year project, starting in the planning
phase, continuing to design and finished when the construction
contract is accepted by the Districts as complete.
These changes are submitted to the Boards of Directors for
approval before any authority is granted. In general , the changes
come about because once projects are in the construction phase
staff can then determine the need for improvements. Most changes
are identified to improve the long-term maintenance and operation
of the facilities, such as added valves, change in piping to avoid
conflicts, adding access doors, changing the location of
components for a variety of reasons, etc.
b. Design Errors and Omissions. Design errors and omissions are
on csidered changes which cost the Districts additional money. An
example would be construction of a wall which later has to be
cored because an opening was not identified for a pipeline. Staff
\�
1-2
and the design engineers share the responsibility for that type of
change, and in many cases the consultants pay for the changes other
than added value.
Whether or not the design engineer reimburses the Districts, the
actual change order must be submitted to the Boards of Directors for
approval .
4. Other Contract Changes
This category includes time extensions, payment of bonuses, charges
for liquidated damages and adjustment of the engineer's originally
estimated quantities.
A contractor is affected by many forces outside of its direct control ,
Including strikes, weather, equipment suppliers and, most importantly,
the Districts' ongoing operational requirements which often do not
allow for process equipment access or shutdowns as originally
scheduled. These time extensions do not generally result in any added
cost.
Another type of added work which arises occasionally is work for other
agencies. An example would include adding or connecting a sewer
lateral for a city in conjunction with a District's collection system
sewer project. The Districts would pay the contractor for the change
order and then seek reimbursement from the city. This type of change
order work is accomplished as a courtesy and helps build good will .
The Districts do not normally solicit this extra work but do it by
request from the city or agency.
Changes that result in extra costs, or deductions, include the payment
of bonuses for early completion, now specified in most contracts to
help assure that we meet regulatory requirements, or minimize
inconveniences to the public; and deductions for late completion
(liquidated damages). Both serve as an incentive for timely
completion of the work.
The adjustment of engineer's estimated quantities to actual
quantities, although generally associated with an overall contract
price adjustment, are not typically considered as an addition or
deduction to the project cost.
5. Change Order Negotiations
The attached chart shows the development and resolution of change
order issues. Costs and/or time are negotiated between staff and the
contractor. Costs are controlled by the General Provisions. They may
be based on time and materials, or a negotiated price which is based
on time and materials. Overhead/profit of 15% is allowed on labor and
materials; equipment is paid at rates determined by the State. State
prevailing wage rates are used for estimating labor charges.
Time extensions are based on delays in the project's critical path.
Most change order items do not have a time extension.
1-3
CHANGE ORDER PROCEDURE
Flow Diagram
Amoum/Rme Yes
' proved
Slag rector
A�moum% AmounURms Yes
as po etl
Shan Prepparare Time girre rin
F.C.O. Change prder Engineering
Sigrred M Yes
F.C.O. Cobrador Yes Change Order Rwiex Yes
tr/
Anpup rov ervime0 r General Counsel
Field Charge es No No No
Order(F.C.O.) No
IDEWRFY NEED Prepared by
nspecmr Yes No Charge Ober
Designer AP by
Staff
oard board of
Contractor Smfl Osdslan Directors
to Proceed Yes NEGOTIATE WORK
Other
as No COST,AND TERMS
Oth
Yes No
No
No
No
CHANGE ORDER DENIAL
APPENDIX 2
Excerpts from General Provisions, Section 10, EXTRA WORK:
"10-6 EXTRA WORK
"A. General
"The Districts reserve and shall have the right, when
confronted with unpredicted conditions, emergencies, or
unforeseen events, to revise the details of the
contemplated work or to add work of a different character
or function and have the Contractor perform such revised or
added work as "Extra Work", when such Extra Work is
considered by the Districts to be vitally appurtenant to
the satisfactory completion of the Project.
"Extra Work" is defined as new or unforeseen work, or added
work of a different character or function and for which no
basis for payment is prescribed; or that involving
revisions of the details of the work in such manner as to
render inequitable payment under items upon which the
Contractor bid; or that work to be done under "stipulated
prices" as given in the bidding schedule.
"The signing of the Contract by the Contractor will be
deemed to be an agreement on his part to perform Extra
Work, as and when ordered by the Engineer. Notice to the
sureties on the Contractor' s bonds will not be given unless
the estimated total value of the Contract, as changed or
supplemented, shall exceed the original total price bid by
more than twenty-five percent (25%).
"If required Extra Work results in delay to the Contract
work, the Contractor will be given an equivalent extension
of time.
"D. Procedure for Extra Work
"1. Upon decision of the Districts to have Extra Work
performed, the Engineer will so inform the Contractor,
acquainting the Contractor with the essential details
of the new work. The Contractor shall thereupon
prepare a price for said work based upon an estimate of
cost and submit said price and estimate to the
Districts whose approval shall be secured before work
is started; excepting that the Engineer may, when in
the best interests of the Districts, order the
Contractor to proceed with the Extra Work in advance of
2-1
submitting the prices and cost estimate. The Districts
reserve the right to reject any claims for Extra Work
or for additional payment claimed as a result of
extending the work under the bid prices which has not
been approved by the Engineer in the manner herein
provided.
112. Prices for Extra Work shall be prepared by the
Contractor in one of the following methods, as
requested by the Districts and submitted to the
Engineer for approval:
"a) For a stated unit price or lump sum amount based
upon current prevailing fair prices for materials,
labor, plant, overhead and profit.
"b) On a direct cost plus a percentage basis (force
account by the Contractor). All work done by the
Contractor on a cost plus a specified percentage
basis will be computed in the manner hereinafter
described, and the compensation thus provided shall
be accepted as payment in full by the Contractor,
and no additional payment will be allowed for use
of small tools, which have a replacement value of
$500.00 each or less, site superintendent's
services, timekeeper's services, pickup or yard
trucks, except as specifically essential to the
work, nor any other overhead expenses incurred in
the prosecution of the force account work.
01) For all materials purchased and used in the
specific work, the Contractor will receive the
actual cost of such materials, including
freight and delivery charges, as shown by
original receipted bills, to which will be
added an amount equal to fifteen percent (15%)
of the sum thereof. It shall be understood,
however, that such salvage value as may be
agreed upon between the Districts and the
Contractor for materials which are not
permanently incorporated in the work will be
deducted from the total amount as derived
above.
112) For all labor, including foremen, engaged in
the specific operation, the Contractor will
receive the wage prevailing and paid on the
Project including fringe benefits for each and
every hour that said labor, including foremen,
is actually engaged in such work. In addition,
the Contractor shall be paid a sum equal to the
2-2
Worker's Compensation Insurance Premiums and
the actual cost of Social Security taxes,
computed on the base rate for the class of work
involved, for the actual amount of the payroll
V. involved. The Contractor will be allowed to
add fifteen percent (15%) markup to these
costs.
113) For any machinery or equipment which is deemed
necessary or desirable to use, the Contractor
will be allowed a rental price for each and
every hour that said machinery or equipment is
in use or delayed as a result of the Districts
on such worksite.
"Equipment charges for Extra Work, or for
delays in work, shall be in accordance with the
current State of California, Department of
Transportation, Division of Construction of
Labor Surcharge and Equipment Rental Rates, as
follows:
"(a) Working Equipment Rates, 100% of the
price listed.
"(b) Standby Equipment Rates, 50% of the
price listed.
"No markup percentage for overhead or profit
shall be added to the working or standby rates.
�..i 113. Labor, materials and equipment may be furnished by the
Contractor, Subcontractor, material man or others on
the behalf of Contractor to perform the "Extra Work".
However, the Districts will deal directly with and make
payments to the Contractor. When "Extra Work" paid for
on a direct cost plus a specified percentage basis is
performed by forces other than the Contractor's
organization, the Contractor shall reach agreement with
other forces as to the distribution of the payment made
by the Districts for such "Extra Work". The specified
percentage contained herein shall be the total
percentage to be added to the direct cost whether
Incurred by the Contractor, Subcontractors, or other
forces.
04. Upon receipt of the Contractor's price, the Engineer
will make an analysis thereof and adopt one of the
following procedures:
"a) Accept the Contractor's price for lump sum or unit
price amount in the original or amended form and
direct the Contractor to proceed with the work; or
2-3
direct the Contractor to perform the work on a
cost-plus basis. No claim for "Extra Work" costs
shall be valid unless made in writing by the
Contractor and approved in writing by the
Districts.
"b) Have the work performed by the Districts' forces on
a separate contract, without undue interference or
hindrance to the Contractor and without claim or
suit by the Contractor for damages on account
thereof."
2-4 .�
APPENDIX 3
❑RGANIZATION CHART
TOM DAWES
DIR. OF ENG.
ADMINISTRATION CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT
PLANNING AND DESIGN
JACK VINCENT
MGR. OF ENG.
3�
DENNIS MAY PAUL MITCHELL GEORGE THUR❑ CHUCK WINSOR
SPCL, PROJECTS PLANT DSGN. MGR. ELECTL✓INST. MGR, COLL. DSGN, MGR.
CIE �
BUD PALM JOHN DETTLE
)E PROJECT MGR. PROJECT MGR.
WENDY SEVENANDT JIM HARRIS
PROJECT MGR, PROJECT MGR.
X X
w ROGER CARRILL❑ MATTHEW SMITH
PROJECT MGR, PROJECT MGR,
0
N DESIGN PROJECT MANAGERS
DESIGN RESPONSIBILITIES
JAN 1990 - DEC 1992
J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D
• a • p • u u u • e e • • a • p • u u u • e e a • • • p • u 11 u • c a e
n e r r r, 19 r . r r n l r r e fi n I r .
• o • • B B • S S S a S B S S S 1 9 S 1 B • B S S B • 91
S S S S B B B S
D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o I 1 1 1 1 1 1 : x : x : x : x x 1 x 1
Jim Harris Job No. L VNIM
S•eeNpr L.pwienn pl PI.]e ]e w D...
OxNNIiry Rullrin•I ..._......_...._ -------
age Hw IM Flail11n p P1 Ptd4] xxpO Cb ..—... . .._..........._..._..._.. S
Olpe•Ip•1410 nP1 P1J•'] 24.00 CB' ..._... . Cs
MI,W pI Dl9•np•)•rd 9.1 PI P, M1 BOO CS --------Cs
MI,•6 el Dbnbr.9 utl 101,PI PIJ63 3.00 CS -cs
0—O Wl Ben,.Sullen.1P] 1is 2000 Cb---CS
C-N.P—cenrnin IIS. ]]Op CS- —t9
..I P— I Oannllon 11.1 is"p— --0 CS
Cemnl P—:c.,.,.nn 1'I0.2 ]a oO Cb—-----------------__--_---___________—_—
c.nnwcwpl,.o,wm.9.n J'va Lw p_ ---_________p cs ------___________—
Electr :efp,ofPunppnrnnP] P2.1.1 x).o0p__.__.______.__._.__.__..__.__.___....
So".. I,WPw1on•112 1`2.x.1 1..00 D...------._..___.__—__.__D c4 c9
R•pl.c•menr of CemplpNeJ MCNloiiry Slol•m P2-1. .DOD- —_._......----.__D
P,im•ry Clo ier•16Q7 0 PI Plr31 32,W P p
MilcNbraou lmpw•m•m• P1 ]S )OOP- -P
Mhcellwou ZZ.— Px'.] I'm P— --p
R•b6 el ppnl.r•i.J.R.L.M.N.0 P1'19 IS.w
Toll V•lu 2•1.]O
Wendy Sevenandt J.1,N.. IIMILI
CompmnluJ F•cililin D—Irp 6Y.Ym J-26J 1b0 P .._...._._.__._....
Prlmnv Clorlli—1.21•1 PI PI-]I 32.60 P P D—
. —...... .. .. .p
AcuOv L..'No.lmp. I,Np PI-0B'1 1.13 P. —P D ..
LISlm MbnOwau lmpw•mw,M Pld•'1 1.66 P —P p
.—ZooM Mingllwou lmpn•mm1• PI ]9'. 1..16 P I D
ul,om Mi•nOwau lmpor.mw• P2�41 6.. P---P p
No-.rpml Minnllw.0 lmpor.mlr,lo Px.NJ 12.70 P---PD
Pronn Ap•FI,•Pra.n IN 6n1.m MM. PI 316 ]00 P---------
P,eeo.NOFF•Pror.W.: I.lem Me!• P240 1.1 p---------
Wn1•wNp..lo,Dir...l.nv Tm1.6YWr 009 D-
b —
F¢IIilYlmpronm.nloWS• yUp9rW P6.0 6.00 P
F.eIli1Y Impnrem.nl•.rd...I,U.,. P}a 4.60 P
HNW.1 DIpn1•ro 1,J.R.L.M.N,0 P2-39 1600 0"Y C.mgeu Ind..02.11 P—
Mq.nm•.+10 Ti—k 6.Ne•1 Mml No.1 R-03I 0.09 D— —D
Prpn.CWI.R,6.T,U,6 R mw Foo.p M.1 PNt low 1
TeW V/u• y]JI
(L)
N
0 P.PI•Irrlipq
D Owlsn
Ln cs c( .rrswp«r -
DESIGN 1. JNSIBILITIES
JAN 1990 - DEC 1992
i M A M J J A 5 O N D J f M A As J J A 5 0 N D J i M A M J J A S 0 N 0
0 p 0 p 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 p p p 0 0 10 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o I 1 I I I z x x x x x z z z z x z
Chuck Winsor JPb No. IMID
cpnecl-system.ID,th-werM P,pq.Dot,) ...It- _._..........0
e,mam,. JObe,.I-Sswe, 2.2e "to D-. _too t_......_._...._D CS -...................__._...__. _. CS
M.m.,r L.rw m1mcocts,sew., 2.30 3A) D--- ..._....___.._._...._..._.........._. ._._...._D cs. toot..__..............
MW.,.o,wq.001n.ARUW Se-1. 2.6.x 0".
lememminl.,amol servo 3-262 0.)bD... ....._-----............__........_...__............................._..............D cs. ......_....................__........__............_.._cS
o.wgnw..am SWIn Post,Sown 3.26 1.,.D... __........____
my, to 0uu,some 9 Rocky P,,Pwnp$meow 6.32 042 D_ _ ___��. _��.��__...__....._._...._...___._..._......._..._.._.......toot.._.D cs toot..
Imww.m.nu ID Set,.-p.P-P SMnon 633 1.3. D_ ---- 0 Cs _...
Imwm'.1D 0eyae.01.llu sewn.Ph.2 .312 2.3)D- -.-.---_D cY .------__._cs
Imw.•.1D a.Yae.O,.nvk$.wort Pn.3 5.Se.3 ..oa 0__.___________p CS, ------cs
SaNh Lav,iruN$ewer.T.I fid6�1 1.00 M -09
._h Cost,
Sew.,,Ph.2 fi�Obd 1]6 D D
L,pW Cer.Puns SLm- fide 1.00 D --0
ABwrem 0 P,SM.e,Tulm NIIN ).le 2-06 P......_.......... . . .. ......._.. .............. ._._... .. ...... ._toot
A6tnem RN Ph-1 0.10 D... ..._.._.. ._.._.........-0 CS -...
ALx4m Res NM P.S.Phw2 ).le-1�2 0.13
L.mm N.ryM.Sower St.- ).le 0.11
mp,oumere.......11.e1 Pun031Nim ).l-1 0]6 P- ... --P
Ses.e.-Der.C-fts Ar.3WNui"oh'
Tell 11- ]L00
John Dettle Jebxt. iMlu
ROheD of CYprv.eve.S.".Awe' 2.9-R1 210 0----
ReDlntoYas.PS.PMmouch.Abagpmp bD O.Ib P---- -- -P D- ----
51u]y,pA6Wonl1 7-1.1 0.0. P- -----P
RMou,nn.101.In SIDhen at Del.Ch.-I 7l0d 0.20 P-- - ----p
rr-Policy,t 3tlel"Rail Awn 1�3E2 0.24 D-
Impwemem.1....S11.1P-P Sttllm 171 ..1. D-
"so.DIPntimelOrry.pNbr3.wn )-O 0A6 1-----
O'l.PwkA-Awn th"Ism 1�10 0.60 D----
C me-NLLAwnst.- 1�1p 0so D------
ehWmNevYweYPunPSlNim 720 1.14 P- -P D-
T.<.I....asm 12. ..1. P
f I.,.Sown Mh.p P -P
PIochowe Lme.LW 51 to N.w1eN 1,- 200 P-
Tptl Vlu 10,30
(V
W
0
D PI.nN q
N D.
-.oleo
cs-OonvuPOm sweD,e
DESIGN RESPONSIBILITIES
JAN 1990 - DEC 1992
J F M A M J J A 6 O N D J F M A M J l A B 0 N D J F M A M l J A s D N D
r r n 6 . e n 1 e r 1 V . [ [ r 11 1 P r • e n e 1 1 Y . 1 F e r [
• • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 0 • • • • • • 0 • 0 • • 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 } } } } 3 }
Roger Carrillo JaC Now F MIL1
Rwl Suenaa In cen.Den.at P+ 0.12 D- --------0
Dlrglnlwip.Iw Aemlrmnni..Fnxllee Mw2 D-----------D cs --
SeMm1a 51ufY fNrmnl.I MVc lmperemem. PL343 D.}I D-------------0
Sebm1e 51ufY FNmem el Mbw lmpwremem. P}JY} 0.3. D— --0
Selemle Re11o111.1 B&C N.MworY. 1`3�434-0 I.... D- --..______._.0
Owre0aln Cemn fe1w1w.1 PI-1 N.2 P2Q3-6.1 2.00 D— --D
w«eFVr aYN n Rvn...3 P2 36 2 2.00 D--------------—
__________
MJlyenwvOWp.elPlwx3 P2 36 3364 3.W D—
Cma Mwq.mw10111e n PS P2-366 1.60
.0aMta.1C 1-.1 l.Impa,at P, P3 11116 2.OD D—
MAd 6 cmr.rMw of f.M.N"I P1 J-2, OAO D—
New Pneanxl-. n Pl.M Ne.1 J-21 0.•0 P —P p
Deme MRemwMOl ,WL&a 0lEp.tl P3 YT OJO P------------------------
M6cR.vitlen[eCen.Mld M039 0.12 0— --006
D.IoneH Mw Pu•Wner s.nem Ip Ld M00•
CanVq CwN.r/06M BYMiry at PI l-2}1 160 CL
Tae1 VYu 39.69
Matthew Smith Jd No. 2IM1LI
wMe1Y CINllne le.2}n PI PI.32 32...
RMdnR.u.n el PlMo.anir..".at Pl 1,141 2.W P-------
R.ndelPlMwcl.ONnDwu0nP2 P24e em fa--------
3e1.mmRnl.0lelIM-1 wn Pl P1ae-1.1 ..Go la—------
.—I.RmmN.I Oec wdwM. P2432 1 10.06 o-------
Za—ReVo"I.I01rw1ve.elP2 P243d-2 0.00 P—
.—M,R1n P1w1w 1`2J3 2 0.60 CS --
Imluwl s.mpel. 0.26 D——O M--
TMYVeIue Moo
(J
P.%er[r1y
D oe F
N cs.c�
l/ i
DESIGN it ONSIBILITIES ,
JAN 1990 - DEC 1992
J f M A M J J A 0 O N D l F M A M J J A 6 0 N D J F M A M J J A ] O N 0
P r11
n e , r n 1 0 r 1 v a n 6 r , r • 1 0 r v • n 6 , r n 1 0 r
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 6 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 o e o Y 6 6 p Y 0 0 p G 0
D a 0 D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o t t t t 1 1 + i t t + + : z x x 3 : z z z z z z
Bud Palmquist Job No. F Wlu
Mee.1.Bu.0 Anwv.,M.T1. 1.10 080
Soli.11.1 Sail,".arm.A.1.1...Pole 231 ].00 P._........__._........._......____..............__.__.._.................P
nA..I slat Be..pile.Im.rt.Me,Lw., 3"0 Dn P—._._......_._.________..._.........._........_........__.._.PO
i.AIR ... ...._...................................—__
Mal TA.Sl Avn e Or.,NM nrPo An 3.]6R M. P--........_ ._._..........................................._.P 0... ..._.........__........................—_....
PI.n.01 S...'IPCN ar.vlt,sewed 6.3)J>a 3.00 P........_.___................._.__.._...____..._._._.____P D._
61PMn n Pnga.W Cron 11 S.A.Rlv.r 6..116 S 638 1.65 D .-D
Mee.D1.1.State APM1pn 6 Riler]Ipwn x Ploln t 6d0 ].O D--------------0
FAAR,.11.1 Se—, p�li 31,0 D- - —
Mof.to Sail"...rinl.rnptar Linda,R.A.Rlvol b41-0 OAx D— --0
nNpullenel Ml[iholvo no 6utlm hlld IAp 0— ----0
.—Itre Cott-Se—"A" ,'an )46 0.15 D -.0
PueM1m Lim,LA.St o Rommel IL P P
Slate,Ave,P.S. ILl) 1260 0
6.4np1.1v my Slenen.0..m'n1..S-chop Cnolnal M.1.IA.1 0.30 D— -----'-D
9.,101.1.r 1 m.,eaN,..—R M.Firs... I..l.u.z 2w0 0_. __.—�___� _p fiappi Palette
MrrN N�p.r.Ap CM1.I.fn N LIM] 13.10 D
Y n C Tr. %ebm D
Te1Y V.lu 41.33
W
D P.Pl.mlrq
p.ppyn
N Cs-CRhaeaoal Rea l
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
Al ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
+ October 15, 1992
10W EWa AVENUE
*o.au.a+a�
STAFF REPORT 10UNEAIN VAULEV.CAUFORNIA 9272a.8137
nlu Uaa411
Results of Ne otiations re Reimbursement for
rrors an ssions C ange Urcrers
I. PREFACE
At the regular Board Meeting of September 9, 1992, the Directors
requested a report from staff discussing the results of change order
reimbursement negotiations with professional engineers responsible for
the preparation of design plans and specifications on four treatment
plant construction projects. As part of staff's report on change
orders to the Directors, change order items which involve errors and
omissions are routinely noted in the General Manager's Agenda Report.
The Manager's Agenda Report for September 9 noted that certain change
order items on the four projects were determined by staff to be the
result of consultant errors and omissions. The Directors added other
items to be considered and requested that a report be submitted to the
Fiscal Policy Committee and, ultimately, to the Boards of Directors
giving the results of staff's negotiations with the consultants.
II. RESULTS
�..� Table 1 gives the results of staff analysis and negotiations.
TABLE 1
9/9/92 Agenda Reimbursement Reimbursement
Item No. and Change Order/ Recommended Agreed to by
(Job No.) Items Nos. by Staff Consultant
9(c) C.O. 12: 1, 3,
Job No. J-17 7, 10, 11, 12
and 13 (add 5*,
6*, 8* and 9*) $8,476.00 $8,476.00
9(d) C.O. 13: 5
Job No. J-19-1 (add 1*, 2*,
3* and 4*) 39148.14 3,148.14
9(e) C.O. 13 (add
Job No. P1-34-3 1* and 2*) 456.00 456.00
9(f) C.O. 5: 2, 3
Job No. P2-42-1 and 6 (add 5*) 2,313.25 2,131.25
*Change order items added by Directors for consideration of
partial reimbursement by designers.
Appendix A gives an explanation of the logic used to develop the staff
recommendation for each item listed above.
Table 2 shows the source of change orders for each of the four jobs
the Directors asked to be reviewed. Note that the percentage of
actual design omissions and errors is very small in relation to the
project's total cost and within ranges well within industry standards.
While staff, consultants and the contractors would all prefer
error-free jobs, design omissions and errors do not usually represent
a large part of the total project cost.
TMD:jt
ENG/TMD/SR3
.►
-2-
TABLE 2
Analysis of Reasons for Change Orders
Submitted to September 9, 1992 Board
...........
TOTAL Wc 0 ----- -
Mu
PPERCENT: WOAKNOF CAUSED MA
... .............. ...
....... ... ........ .
am
-
BY DESIGNM OMISSIONS. MUTES CHANGES
TDIDWRACT - .
.. ..........
..... ................
ERttORS
22 2: .. ...... ......... ........
J-17 IOD% $7,00.000 14.99% 3.59% 1.36% 8.9B% 0.76% 0.30%
J-19-1 92% $15,410,855 3.90% 0.31% 0.86% 0.31% 0.62% 1.80%
Pt-34-3
J-21 99% $27,205,378 2.32% 0.19% 1.30% 0.22% 0.28% 0,33%
PI-35-2
P2-42-1 91% $9,369.000 1.72% O.00k 0.26% 0.42% 0.700A 0.34%
APPENDIX A
TO
STAFF REPORT, DATED OCTOBER 15,1992
REGARDING
Results of Negotiations re Reimbursement for
Error and Omissions Change Orders
and
Review of Construction Contract
Change Order Practices
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF
ORANGE COUNTY
1992
r
W
The purpose of this report is to provide additional information
and clarification for specific items of work for four (4) change
orders that were presented to the Board of Directors at their
regular meeting on Wednesday, September 9, 1992.
The specific items in questions are the result of omissions or
,r errors in the design drawings by the consulting engineers that
resulted in plan changes and consequently, extra work. As noted
in the Manager's Report of subject meeting, there will be a
partial recovery of costs from the consulting engineer.
u
rl
r
r
r
r
r
TABLE OF CONTENTS
r Section I - Central Laboratory J-17
J.R. Roberts Corporation
Change Order 12
r Items 1,3,5,6,7,8,9,10,17 and 13
4.1 Section II- Central Power Generation System At
Plant No. 1 J-19
Hunter Corporation
Change Order 13
Items 1,2,3 ,4 and 5
r Section III- Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16
At Plant No. 1 P1-34-3
Advanco Constructors
Change Orders 13
Items 1 and 2
✓ Section IV - Electrification of Pump Drives
�..✓ At Plant No. 2 P2-42-1
Ziebarth & Alper Construction Co.
Change Order 5
Items 2,3,5 and 6
✓
Y/
✓
✓
Yi
C. 0. NO. Twelve (12)
CONTRACTOR: _J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY. JOB NO. J-17
' DESIGNER BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
.I
Item I - ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FOR A. C. UNITS
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install two additional 14-inch x
26-inch steel beams, one under Air Conditioner No. 2 and the other under Air
Conditioner No. 3. The actual structural steel layout of specified air
conditioner units was different than shown on the contract drawings. This item
was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the
General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 19)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,282.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $ 710.00 O
MATERIAL : $ 197.00 0
EQUIPMENT: $ 300.00 00
MARK-UP : $ 85.00 $ 40.50
..r TOTAL: $1282 . 00 $ 42 .50
Item 1 Continued Next Page
r
r
r
C.O. No. Twelve ( 12)
Item 1 .,
Job No. J-17
r
Justification For Recommended Allocation
r
Districts policy dictates that equipment or materials may not be
recommended from one source which is called "sole sourcing" . r
Contract specifications call for a particular type of equipment
or equal. Therefore, after that contract has been awarded, the
Contractor will search for the piece of equipment that meets the
specifications at the lowest possible price. +
Neither the Design nor the Districts know what the actual
physical dimensions of the equipment may be until it is presented r
to the Districts by the Contractor for review. Therefore another
structural member had to be added under the proposed air
conditioner unit in order to be safely mounted on the roof.
This could have been avoided if the contract included language �Jr
that any necessary modifications for "or equal" equipment is the
responsibility of the contractor. +
r
r
+
r
/ r
v r
_ C. 0. NO. Twelve (1"
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
...r DESIGNER BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Item - DOUBLE STUD WALL AT STAIRS NO. 1 AND 3
The Contractor was directed to provide double studs for radius walls of stairs
No. 1 and No. 3 in order to fill five-inch gap between landing and framing. The
gap was created by a dimensional error between the Structural and Architectural
Drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: RFI 159 and 160, JRR CDR
36R)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1.992.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
_ RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $ 880 .00 $ 880. 00
MATERIAL : $ 851 .60 $ 851 .60
EQUIPMENT: 0 . 00 0 .00
MARK-UP : $ 260 .40 $ 260 .40
.i TOTAL: $1992 . 00 $1992 .00
U
C.O. No. Twelve VI
Item 3
Job No. J-17 U
Justification For Recommended Allocation
L
There was a dimensional error between the structural and
architectural drawings. This error created a gap between the Ij
stair landing pan and the metal studwall. The engineer was y
assessed 100% of the cost of this item.
I !
YI
li
` ,N
L
IV
L
L
L
�LI
L
_ C. 0. N0. Twelve (121
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
_ JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY JOB NO J-17
DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
item 5 - ADDITIONAL STRUCTURAL SUPPORTS FOR ELEVATOR
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install additional structural
supports for the elevator. These were required by the State Elevator Inspector
in order to meet code. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 60R)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6.500.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
A
111T 1
RECOMNENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR :$ 4500 .00 0
- MATERIAL :$ 1500.00 0 _
EQUIPMENT:$ 131 .00 0
-..r MARK-UP : $ 369.00 $ 184.50
TOTALS 6500 .00 $ 184. 50
C.O. No. Twelve (12) L
Item 5
Job No. J-17 -}
Justification For Recommended Allocation �li
The State of California elevator inspector required additional
structural support for the elevator guide rails after the rails V
were installed. It is the engineers responsibility to design per
code. The cost of this item of work would have increased the bid
by an equivalent amount. Staff recommends that the designer
reimburse for added costs, at 50% of the overhead and profit.
y
I
L
Ff
b
V
L
L
�L
L
C. 0. NO. Twelve (12)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Item 6 - SHEET METAL COVERS FOR A. C. FILTER UNITS
The Contractor was directed to provide sheet metal covers for the four air
conditioner filter units. The covers are necessary to protect against water
leakage through the A.C. platform into the building. The covers were not shown
or called out on the Contract Drawings. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: JRR CDR 50)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: f 1,279.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
III
i
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $ 548 ,00 0
MATERIAL : $ 548.00 0
EQUIPMENT: $ 0 .00 0
MARK-UP : $ 182.00 0
.. TOTAL:$ 1278 . 00 0
n .
C.O. No. Twelve
Item 6
Job No. J-17 .�
I
Justification For Recommended Allocation r'
This item was added by staff to prevent problems, should a leak
occur. It is part of the "belt and suspender " approach that
staff uses is, always backups. It is not a designer error.
,
n
r+
n
^I
n
C. 0. NO. Twelve (12)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE Seotember 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
.. Item 7 - RESURVEY CURB
The Contractor was required to recalculate and to resurvey the curb for the
sample drop off turnout. This was due to an error in the curve data on the
Contract Drawings. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 72)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 956.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
e
_i
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $ 819.00 $ 819 .00
MATERIAL : 0 .00 0
EQUIPMENT: 0 .00 0
.� MARK—UP : $ 137 .00 $ 137 .00
TOTAL: $ 956.00 $ 956 .00
� L
C.O. No. Twelve 1 '
V
Item 7
Job No. J-17
I
Justification For Recommended Allocation II
There was a- error in the curve date on the contract drawings.
The contractors surveyor was required to recalculate and restake
curb at the sample drop turn out. The engineer was assessed 100%
of the cost of this item.
I �
v
L'
L
I �
V
u
I �
u
L'
I '
1 u
L
C. 0. NO. Twelve (121
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
item 8 - VARIOUS DRYWALL REVISIONS
The Contractor was directed to furr walls, columns, and steel posts in Rooms
103, 105, 115. 121. 212, 213, 222, 227, 229, and 231,. soffit in Room 115. The
Contractor also provided a stainless steel cap for sill and ceramic tile for
window jambs of Room 118. The furring of walls and columns is required for
casework to line up and to cover vent ducts. The stainless steel cap and
ceramic tile is to extend maintenance. This item was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: JRR CDR 71R and 77R. FCO 40)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 13,140.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days
•
C. O. NO. Twelve (12) W
Date September 9, 1992 `
Page 2
Job: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
Li
II
L,i
Item 8 - VARIOUS DRYWALL REVISIONS
11
Li
It
Lj
L
i
I
r
L
u
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
u
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $ 9, 911 .00 0 I I
MATERIAL : $ 2,170 .00 0 L
EQUIPMENT: $ 0 0
MARK-UP $ 1,059.00 0 , I
TOTAL: $ 13,140.00 0 U
1
ILIi
r
r
C.O. No. Twelve
r Item 8
Job No. J-17
r
Justification For Recommended Allocation
r
This is the furring if walls, columns, steel post, soffit and the
rear of a drinking fountain added by change orders. The cost of
r this item should not be the responsibility of the engineer.
W
y
J
r
r
r
r
C. 0. NO. Twelve (12)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Item 9 - MODIFY SITE WORK
The Contractor was directed to construct, pursuant to the revised design, the
.. loading dock, concrete ramp, six-foot cross gutter, front entry sidewalk,
handicap ramp, and to add handicap ramp, bollard, and wire mesh at rear
sidewalk. Also to remove plaster and install 3/4-inch channel screed at two
locations on the north face of the building, replaster and refog seal , the entire
panel . The Contractor was also directed to delete 4118 linear feet of asphalt
paving, 24 linear feet of curb, and 170 square feet of gutter. The revisions
are required in order to comply with Federal Registar, Americans with
Disabilities Act Title 24, Access to Public Buildings. Deleted items of work to
be completed by others. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant
to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO 41, JRR
CDR 78R)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,694.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 20 Calendar Days
r x
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $ 9,159.00 0
MATERIAL : 0 .00 0
EQUIPMENT: 0 .00 p
MARE-UP $ 535 .00 0
TOTAL: $ 9,694 .00 0
C. 0. NO. Twelve (12)
r CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17 DATE September 9,1992
ITEM 9 -MODIFY SITE WORK Page 2
r
r
r
r
/f
l
L
U
C.O. No. TwelveI
Item 9 u
Job No. J-17 -
u
Justification For Recommended Allocation
v
The District directed design changes were made to enhance the use
of the facility and to meet the requirements of Americans with
Disabilities Act, Title 24, Access to Public Buildings. This Act u
took effect after the project was designed, therefore the
engineer should not be responsible for these costs.
6i
u
U
�r
L
L
u
li
U
C. 0. NO. Twelve (12)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY. JOB NO. J-17
DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION _
Item 10 - MODIFY GRAVITY CONVEYORS, DISH SINK, AND HOOD
The Contractor was directed to revise the gravity conveyers, dish sink and hood
in Room 118. This work consisted of notching and rewelding supports, relocating
mounting clips, conveyor modifications, and additional engineering to accomplish
the new layout. The Contractor was also directed to fabricate and install
stainless steel support legs for hood and 316 stainless steel valve handle guide
for dish sink. Revisions were necessary in order for the roam to function as
intended. Weight of hood would not allow anchoring into wall only. 30-inch
valve extensions required suppport. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR
CDR 92R)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,622.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 14 Calendar Days
� — r
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CEANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR $ 5, 882 .00 $4 ,451 .00
MATERIAL : $ 740.00 $ 607 .00
EQUIPMENT: 0 n
...i MARK-UP 0
TOTAL: $ 6, 622.00 $5,058 .00
C. O. NO. Twelve (12)
DATE September 9, 1992
Page 1
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
ITEM 10 - ADDITIONAL LAB CHASES
kFa
r
�T• x
'r
, � . ...
r
r
�r
r
r
r
L1
U
L
C.O. No. Twelve L!
Item 10
Job No. J-17 -
V
Justification For Recommended Allocation
Rework of equipment was necessary because of incomplete
information on specified equipment and omission of details from .J
the contract drawings. The engineer should pay $5,058. of the
cost of this item.
L
li
Y.1
�r
( I
W
Lj
Ir
i
L
L
u
�I j
W
C. 0. NO. Twelve (12)
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
_ Item 11 - ADDITIONAL LAB CHASES
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install four extra lab chases to
conceal power, telephone, and data conduit to the lab tops from the second floor
ceiling. The Contract Drawings did not show the lab casework being fed from
below. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 95)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,548.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 1 Calendar Days
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $ 1 ,032 .00 $ 50. 00
MATERIAL : $ 516 .00 0
.... EQUIPMENT: 0 O
MARK-UP 0 0
TOTAL: $ 1, 548. 00 $ 50 .00
C. O. NO. Twelve (12 )
DATE September 9, 1992
Page 2
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
-moo, ITEM 11 - ADDITIONAL LAB CHASES
r
r
r
r
r
r
r"".00
r d
r 'df
r
r
r
r
11
I
�II
1
C.O. No. Twelve
Item 11 �f
Job No. J-17
Justification For Recommended Allocation
11
v
The lab chases were omitted from the contract drawings. since
the cost of this item of work would have increased the bid 1
amount, the engineer should only be responsible for the staff W
costs. This item had been negotiated with the Contractor and
with no overhead and profit included.
LI
L
I
1 !
r
L
i�
b/
J
L
L
C. 0. N0. Twelve I121
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
DESIGNER BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
v
Item 12 - ADDITIONAL FRAMING AND FIRE RATED DRYWALL
r The Contractor was directed to provide additional framing and drywall for fire
rated wall in soffit area above Rooms 234 and 236. This work was necessary as
there was not enough clearance in the soffit to allow for the HVAC ductwork and
r maintain the one-hour fire rating required for the corridor. This item was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2)(A) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: JRR CDR 98)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM $ 1,074.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 3 Calendar Days
d
NO PICTURE AVAILABLE
v,l
V
r
J RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $ 800.00 0
MATERIAL : $ 120.00 0
EQUIPMENT: 0 0
MARK-UP : $ 154.00 $ 77.00
,ram TOTAL: $1,074.00 $ 77.00
r
U
C.O. No. Twelve
Item 12 J
Job No. J-17
� I
V
Justification For Recommended Allocation
u
The engineer did not coordinate between the mechanical and
architectural drawings. This lack of coordination required j .
additional framing and drywall in order to maintain a one hour 6d
fire rating of the corridor. If shown on the plans, the bid
prices would have been higher. The staff recommends that the
designer share in the added profit and overhead costs. L
W
I '
11r
�.F
i
w
+II
L
II
�'Wj r
_L
C. 0. NO. Twelve f121
CONTRACTOR: J.R. Roberts Corporation DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: CENTRAL LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
DESIGNER: BOYLE ENGINEERING CORPORATION
Item 1 - VELOCITY STACKS FOR EXHAUST FANS
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install five additional velocity
stacks for Exhaust Fans EF-3, 6, 6, 8, and 13. The stacks were not installed
due to a conflict in the Contract Drawings. The HVAC system could not be
balanced without the installation of these stacks. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: JRR CDR 99)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: S 1,617.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 7 Calendar Days
V
r
1
C. 0. NO. Twelve (12) V
DATE September 9, 1992
Page 2 U
JOB: LABORATORY, JOB NO. J-17
ITEM 13 - VELOCITY STACKS FOR EXHAUST FANS
u
' ,
u
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
LAHORCOST: $ 925.00 TOTAL ASSIGHM TO DESIGNER:
MATERIAL : $ 460.00 0
EQUIPMENT: 0 0
MARK-UP $ 232 .00 $ 116.00 v
TOTAL: $1,617 .00 $ 116.00
V
�L
r
V
v
V
u
L
u
`. L,
L
r
r
C.O. No. Twelve
r Item 13
Job No. J-17
%W
Justification For Recommended Allocation
v
Only two exhaust fans were called out to have velocity stacks.
Seven are required in order to balance the HVAC system. Since
,r the cost of this item of work would have increased the bid
amount, Staff recommends that the designer share in its added
profits and overhead.
r
r
rl`�
r'
1�
r
b1
�I
r
r
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1
r
DESIGNER• BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Item 1 - CONDUIT AND WIRING FOR EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURES
This item is for providing conduit, wiring, and junction boxes to provide power
for the emergency light fixtures in the Central Power Generation Building.
These light fixtures were omitted in the contract documents. Emergency battery
packs for type B fixtures are included in this item. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions.
r (Reference: J191-040)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: E 18,550.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
r
" NO PICTURES AVAILABLE "
r
rr�
.w
r
rl
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
r
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $ 11 ,345.00 0
MATERIAL : $ 4,285.00 0
EQUIPMENT: $ 500.00 0
.� MARE-UP : $ 2,420 .00 $ 835.00
r
TOTAL: $ 18,550 .00 $ 835.00
r
ii
C.O. No. Thirteen li
Item 1 y
Job No. J-19-1
UO
V
Conduit And Wiring For Emergency Light Fixtures
� I
v
This item for providing conduit, wiring, and junction boxes to
provide power for the emergency light fixtures inside the Central j
Generation Building. Contract changes of this scope are more `;
costly than original contract costs due to lost productivity,
increased field engineering and supervision. The consultant
omitted these items from the original design and should reimburse
the Districts for these added cost.
L'
y
i�
y
Yd
� j
VI
L
L`
l
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1
DESIGNER: BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Item 2 - POWER, CONTROL, SIGNAL RACEWAY, AND CABLE FOR ENGINE CONTROLS
This item is for providing conduit, supports, wiring, wire terminations and
additional testing required to provide power and controls to the owner-supplied
engine controls. The contract documents did not provide the correct number of
circuits required to operate the control features provided with the engine
controls. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b)l of the General Provisions. (Reference: J191-031)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 18,191.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
I
v�
jl
4r
C. O. NO. Thirteen (13)
DATE September 9, 1992 1
Page 2 kw
�ll I
V
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT No. 1 J-19-1
� I
ITEM 2- POWER, CONTROL, SIGNAL RACEWAY, AND CABLE FOR ENGINE V
CONTROLS
L
� i
W
It
LI
L
L
L
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: �(
LABOR : $ 12,397.00 0
MATERIAL : $ 3,221.00 0
EQUIPMENT: $ 200.00 0 L
MARK-UP $ 2,373.00 0
TOTAL: $ 18,191.00 $ 682.00
I !
V
U
C.O. No. Thirteen
Item 2
Job No. J-19-1
Power, Control, Signal Raceway, And Cable For Engine Controls
Y�1
This item for providing conduit, supports, wiring, wiring
terminations, and additional testing to provide power for the
v generator engine controls. Contract changes of this scope are
more costly than original contract costs due to lost
productivity, increased field engineering and supervision. The
.r consultant omitted these items from the original design and
should reimburse the Districts for these added cost.
Yd
r�
r
•.I
r�
r
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No 1 Job No J-19-1
DESIGNER: BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Item 3 - ELEVATOR SHAFT REVISIONS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE'
This item is for providing a ladder, receptacle, junction box, light fixture,
switch and associated conduit and wiring in the elevator shaft to comply with
state elevator code requirements. These items were not provided for in the
contract documents. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions. (Reference: J191-043)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,014.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ill
� , •I
i
a
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
DATE September 9, 1992 II
Page 2 .J
�I
L
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 1.
_ L
ITEM 3 - ELEVATOR SHAFT REVISIONS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE L
If
Wd
L
`L
I
.J
L
L
L
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION L
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR $ 2,098 .00 0
MATERIAL : $ 1,257.00 0 L
EQUIPMENT: $ 135.00 0 �I
MARK_Dp : $ 524.00 $ 262.00
TOTAL: $ 4,014.00 S 262.00 ( 'L
�U
hJ
r
r
..W,
r
C.O. No. Thirteen
r Item 3
Job No. J-19-1
r
Elevator Shaft Revisions For Code Compliance
r
This item for providing facilities in the elevator shaft to allow
safe access and working conditions for maintenance personnel
working inside shaft. These items are required by state elevator
codes. Contract changes of this scope are more costly than
original contract costs due to lost productivity, increased field
engineering and supervision. The consultant omitted these items
from the original design and should reimburse the Districts for
these added cost.
r
r
r
r
r
r
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1
.y DESIGNER: BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Item 4 - ENGINE STATUS PANEL COMPONENTS AND CABLE
This item is for adding push-buttons, indicating lights, and tarminal boards to
the engine status panel shown on contract drawings 2E27 and 2E44. These changes
to the panel are required for compatibility between the owner-supplied equipment
and contractor-furnished control panel . These panel components were not
required in the contract documents. This item includes credit for deleting
control raceway and cable between the status panel and the uninterruptible power
supply that is no longer required. This item was negotiated with the Contractor
pursuant to Section 10-6(b)l of the General Provisions. (Reference: J191-044)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,921.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
r
NO PICTURES AVAILABLE "
se\ �
r
r
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $ 583 . 00 0
MATERIAL : $1 ,117 .00 0
EQUIPMENT: 0 0
MARK—UP : $ 221 .00 0
r
TOTAL:$1 ,921 .00 0
L
L
C.O. No. Thirteen
Item 4 6
Job No. J-19-1
U
Engine Status Panel Components And Cable
it
This item for adding push-buttons, indicating lights, and
terminal boards to the engine status panel. These items are for
compatibility with the owner supplied equipment and were 6,,
overlooked by staff, Cooper Industries, and the designer. This
is a small omission which can be expected on projects of this ` I
complexity.
U
L
I �
U
u
L
L
L
L
L
LW I
_ C. 0. NO.-Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE September 9. 1992
JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1. Job No. J-19-1
\I DESIGNER: BROWN AND CALDWELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS
r Item 5 - GLASS BLOCK MODIFICATIONS
This item is for providing lintels and flashing at the second floor level for
,r glass block windows and revising wall openings for glass block at the front door
in the Central Power Building. Contract drawings require glass -block windows
that are thirty-two feet in height which exceeds the allowable unsupported
height allowed by the building code. This item includes support angles'and
weather flashing at the second floor level for three high windows on the north
side of the building. This item also includes widening of the wall opening on
both sides of the front door to include space for the glass block expansion
joints. Contract drawings show a 16-inch opening on both sides of the door.
Sixteen and one half inches are required to install the glass block and
expansion joints. This item was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to
,. Section 10-6(b)1 of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,603.00
r TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 46,279.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
r
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
r COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $ 2, 585.00 $982 . 30
MATERIAL : $ 548 .00
EQUIPMENT: 0 $208024
MARK-UP : $ 470.00 $178 .60
r TOTAL: $ 3,603 .00 $1,369 .14
1
son
won
now
Now
zl
T „ -
SNOISVJI3IOOW MDOW SSV'IO
T-6I-f -oN 9of I -ON INVU I WRISAS NOIIVESNS0 MaMOd gVEINSJ :BOf
t
Z661 ' 6 uagwa3daS SdVO ( FI ) uaaiilgl 'ON 'O'?
i
u
. u
C.O. No. Thirteen V
Item 5
Job No. J-19-1
Glass Block Modifications
Ir
This item for adding support lintels for glass block windows and
also for reworking the openings around the front door to allow v
room for installation of glass expansion joints. The designer
detailed a dimension on the plans which did not allow 'enough room
to install the glass block expansion joint at the front door. L
This opening in the concrete wall at the front door had to be
widened on half inch after concrete had been poured. Costs
associated with chipping out and grouting back the concrete wall
are being charged to the designer. y
L
V
�.1
I
Li
I '
v
L
L
y
L
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
r CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE September 9. 1992
Zurn Constructors. Inc.
JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1.
Job No. P1-34-3: Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation
Plant No. 1. Job No. P1-35-2: and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare
r
Facilities at Plants 1 and 2. Job No. J-21
DESIGNER: JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
r Ite - LPDG PIPING MODIFICATION
The Contractor was directed to reroute the low pressure digester gas piping
r (LPDG) on the east wall of Control Building 11-14 when conflicts were
discovered. The 20-inch ductile iron piping, as shown on the contract drawings,
interferes with an HVAC exhaust fan at the same elevation. The most cost
effective solution was to reroute the piping over the exhaust fan. The work was
r negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: FCO-052)
r ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,105.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
r
r '
C9
r RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $ 859 .00 0
MATERIAL : $ 3471 .00 0
EQUIPMENT: $ 863 .00 0
r MARK-UP 912 .00 $ 456 .00
TOTAL: $6,105 .00 $ 456.00
u
U
C.O. No. Thirteen
Item 1 U
Job No. P1-34-3
L�
Reconfigure LPDG Piping
The item would have been avoided if the contractor had been given 111
clear information with which to work. The plans for this Li
piping were lacking essential information and the
contractor was given supplemental information which conflicted
with the original drawings. For these reasons, a design fee j �
equal to 7. 5% of the extra costs should be refunded by the design L�
consultant. -
U
i
�J
I
L
U
IL
IY�III
r
u
U
Ly
C. 0. NO. Thirteen (13)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors. Division of DATE September 9. 1992
Zurn Constructors. Inc.
JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1.
Job No. P1-34-3: Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation
Plan= No. 1. Job No. PS-35-2: and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare
_ Facilities at Plants 1 and 2. Job No. J-21
DESIGNER: JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
Item 2 - GAS PIPE SUPPORT CHANGE
The pipe support detail shown on the contract drawings for the LPDG piping on
the roof of the Control Buildings indicates a flush mounted pipe. The piping,
however, must be supported in order to clear the 12-inch parapet curb and also
to maintain a slope down to the drip traps. Since the parapet was incorporated
in the roofing membrane system, it was decided to direct the Contractor to
change the specified support detail to a concrete saddle type with a galvanized
retainer strap in order to support the piping at the correct elevation and
provide seismic restraint. The work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant
to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-53)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,852.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
_ RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $ 4722.00 0
MATERIAL : $ 3270 .00 0
EQUIPMENT: $ 1064 .00 0
MARK-UP : $ 796 .00 0
TOTAL: $ 9852 .00 0
JOB: CONSTRUCTION OF DIGESTERS NOS. C. O. NO. Thirteen ( 13 )
11-16 AT RECLAMATION PLANT NO. 1 DATE September 9 , 1992.
JOB NO. P1-34-3 Page 2
ITEM 2 - GAS PIPE SUPPORT CHANGE
C J �
i Q :� • QI
_ y
L
C.O. No. Thirteen II
Item 2 u
Job No. P1-34-3
L
LPDG Piping Supports
L
The item would have been avoided if the correct detail had been
shown on the plans. However, the contractor's bid would have
been higher by this same amount. The change is a result of a L
drafting error and as such no refunded monies are necessary from
the consultant.
L
L
L
u
L
L
L
L
C. 0. NO. Five (5)
CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth 6 Alper and C.S. Alper DATE September 9. 1992
Construction Co. r
JOB: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1
.� DESIGNER: JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
Item 2 - FILTER CONTROL POWER
After installation was complete, it was later determined that the Ocean Outfall
Booster Station Harmonic Filter Control Power from Panel 'AL' should be
connected to Panel 'BL' for Pumps Nos. 3, 4, and S. In case of a power failure
on Panel 'AL', the facility would lose all filter control to all pumps.
Therefore, the Contractor was instructed to disconnect and reconnect the control
power on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section
10-6(b) (2) (B) . (Reference: PCH No. 026) .
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 411.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
see 00 • AA
1 ;
r r
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $358 .00 $179 .00
MATERIAL : 0 0
EQUIPMENT: 0 0
MARK-UP : $ 53.00 $ 26.50
_ TOTAL:$411 .00 $205.50
ITEM 2 CONTINUED NEXT PAGE
r C. O. NO. FIVE ( 5 )
DATE September 9, 1992
Page 2
JOB: ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2
`/ P2-42-1
M
ITEM 2 FILTER CONTROL POWER
r
r
r
r .
r
r
r
1 ;
Ld
V
IN
C.O. No. Five (5)
Item 2
Job No. P2-42-1
u
1
Justification For Recommended Allocation y
In order to assure the reliability of the Ocean Outfall Booster 11
Station in the event of a power failure, approximately one-half
of the available power was placed on one power feed (Bus A) and `r
the other half on a second power feed (Bus B) . The Designer and
the Districts shared in this change. II
L
' t �Ir
••� 1
i ;
IL;
L
L
L
1 L
W
C. 0. NO. Five (5)
CONTRACTOR:_Ziebarth & Alper and C.S Alper DATE September 9. 1992
Construction Co.
J08: Electrification of Pump Drives at Trgatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1
DESIGNER: JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
Item 3 - PRESSURE SWITCHES
Problems were experienced with the pressure switches that regulate the flow for
the seal water of the ten new pumps installed in Headworks 8 and C. The
pressure switches initially specified did not work properly due to the dirty
plant water. The Contractor was instructed to replace the ten switches with a
better design that was more suitable to the dirty water conditions at a firm
price in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) . (Reference:
Jahn Carollo Engineers' letter dated April 15, 1992 and PCH No. 027)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,875.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
s
b 4
T�
or
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CEANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR $ 720.00 $ 180 .00
MATERIAL : $ 2900.00 $ 725 .00
EQUIPMENT: $ 560 .00 140.00
MARK-UP : $ 695 .00 $ 173 .75
TOTAL: $ 4875 .00 $1218 .75
ITEM 2 CONTINUED NEXT Page
C. O. NO. FIVE ( 5)
y DATE September 9 , 1992
Page 2
..1 JOB: ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2
P2-42-1
ITEM 3 PRESSURE SWITCHES
al
y-
•J I
r
4
r
r
_
N%wo�
r
i �
64
C.O. No. Five (5) II
Item 3 L
Job No. P2-42-1
i !
V
Justification For Recommended Allocation
u
The Districts utilizes plant water throughout their operations
for the cooling of engines, seal water for pumps, wash down of � .
facilities and many other general uses. The quality of the water y
varies from time to time , depending on the amount of foreign
matter that may find its way into the system, such as algae
debris, snails, etc. Therefore, the Districts share the greatest
percentage of responsibility, however, the Designer has been
associated with the Districts operations for a long time and is
very familiar with these operations. Therefore, they are subject
to some liability in this occurrence. L
` ,r
I
V
r
L
L
i
r
L
LJ
Ir
1111
C. 0. NO. Five (5)
CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper DATE September 9. 1992
Construction Co.
JOB: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1
DESIGNER: JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
Item 5 - REMOVE CONCRETE PADS
The contract drawings did not provide for the removal of the existing reinforced
concrete pads that supported the two engines, lube oil, and heat recovery units
in the Primary Effluent Pumping Station. These concrete pads sticking above the
operating floor presented an obstruction to the operation and maintenance of the
new electric motors that replaced the engines. The Contractor was instructed to
provide labor and equipment on a force account basis in accordance with General
Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2) (B) . (Reference: PCH No. 031)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,252.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER:
LABOR : $ 3,952.00 -0
MATERIAL : $ 1,740.00 0
EQUIPMENT: $ 1,500.00 0
MARK-UP : $ 1,060.00 0
TOTAL:$ 8,252 .00 _ 0
ITEM 5 CONTINUED NEXT PAGE
r C. O. NO. FIVE (5)
DATE September 9, 1992
PAGE 2
JOB: ELECTRIFICATION OF PUMP DRIVES AT TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2
_ JOB NO. P2-42-1
ITEM 5 - REMOVE CONCRETE PADS
r
r
r
r
r
W
u
u
C.O. No. Five ( 5)
Item 5
Job No. P2-42-1
r
W
Justification For Recommended Allocation
During the preliminary design review process in which Operations
and Maintenance personnel were involved, particularly the review
meetings, no request was made by them to remove the engine and
heat recovery equipment concrete pads.
v
While the Contractor was in the area performing other demolition
work and after the stated equipment had been removed, it became
apparent that leaving the concrete pads would be a safety hazard. W
The Districts benefited having the work performed while the
Contractor was in the area since the work was on a time and
material basis with no additional costs later for an additional
move in and move out for this or any other Contractor.
i
r
v
W
1,I
V
1
C. 0. N0. Five (51
.. CONTRACTOR: Ziebarth & Alper and C.S. Alper DATE September g. 1992
Construction Co.
JOB: Electrification of Pump Drives at Treatment Plant No. 2. Job No. P2-42-1
`DESIGNER: JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
.. Item 6 - MODIFY LIGHTING FIXTURES '
The contract drawings specified 21 120 volt lighting fixtures for Headworks C
when in fact there is 480 volt power existing. The Contractor had already
purchased and received the lighting fixtures when the error was discovered. The
Contractor returned the lighting fixtures ballast housings to the manufacturer
but was assessed a handling and restocking fee. Work was performed on a force
account in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2) (B) .
(Reference: PCH No. 032)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 889.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 17,689.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
r
1
1
}
i
li
V
u
u
C.O. No. Five (5)
Item 6 y
Job No. P2-42-1
vl
Justification For Recommended Allocation
The Designer shall be charged the full amount of the plan change --
due to his error in the contract drawings and specifications.
V
L
r
L
RECOMMENDATION FOR ALLOCATION
OF EXTRA COSTS ON CHANGE ORDERS L
COST: TOTAL ASSIGNED TO DESIGNER: L
LABOR : 0 0 L
MATERIAL : $780.00 $788.00
EQUIPMENT: 0
MARK-UP : $109 .00 $109.00
TOTAL:$889.00 $889.00 L
ITF.MR 5 rnMTTMnFn NEXT PA( r
LL
L
V L
I
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
,{ b ORANGE COUNtY, CALIFORNIA
i
tOBO<FWG GVENNE
PO.BO%B127
MWNN VP Y.GL6 IA 92720d127
October 22, 1992 v1"I862.pA11
STAFF REPORT
AB 2588 AIR TOWS "HOT SPOTS" NOTIFICATION OBLIGATIONS
AND
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS TO COMPLY
BACKGROUND
The Sanitation Districts' staff is preparing to implement the next phase of the Air Toxics
"Hot Spots" Information and Assessment Act of 1987 (AB 2588), the public notification
requirement AB 2588 is a multi-phase, multi-year program designed to quantify and
characterize emissions of air toxics from stationary sources and to notify the public of
potentially significant "theoretical" health risks associated with facility emissions. All of
the provisions of AB 2588 are applicable to the Sanitation Districts' wastewater
treatment facilities in Fountain Valley and Huntington Beach.
Beginning in 1989, facilities that emit toxic air contaminants were required to provide the
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) with an emissions inventory
every two years. The emissions data are used by SCAQMD to place facilities into
priority categories. Facilities in the highest theoretical emission category must conduct a
./ health risk assessment report and submit it to SCAQMD. The Sanitation Districts have
complied with these provisions. After preliminary review, these health risk assessment
reports were forwarded for approval to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard
Assessment (OEHHA) of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CALEPA).
Approximately 350 health risk assessment reports are expected to be submitted to
SCAQMD (42 from Orange County), about 150 of which have now been reviewed and
forwarded to the CALEPA. To date, CALEPA has not approved any of the 150 health
risk assessment reports submitted by the SCAQMD.
AS 2588 also requires that upon approval of the health risk assessment report, the
operator of the facility must notify all potentially exposed persons about its results if, in
the judgement of the SCAQMD, the health risk assessment report indicates that there is
a "significant health risk" associated with emissions from the facility. A determination of
what is a significant health risk, for purposes of controlling emissions and reducing risk,
has yet to be decided by SCAQMD; however, the development of guidelines for the
notification procedure have been completed by SCAQMD, which is given considerable
latitude by the state with respect to the notification process. SCAQMD has decided
what risk level will trigger public notification, what notification procedure will be
employed, and will identify which facilities must notify potentially exposed individuals
and will ensure that notifications are consistent with the established procedure.
SCAQMD staff, together with other legislative, scientific, business and environmental
\r�
representatives have worked on this complex issue since February 1991. The Sanitation
Districts' staff members were active participants throughout the development of the
notification guidelines.
SCAOMD GUIDELINES
On October 2, 1992 the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted its AB 2588 notification
procedure guidelines. Sanitation Districts' staff believes these guidelines are a
reasonable compromise between the proposals by SCAQMD, the public sector, the
business and environmental communities. The major points of the adopted guidelines
are the following:
1. Notification Levels
The trigger level of the notification procedure has been established by the
SCAQMD Board as a 10-in-a-million carcinogenic risk, for the Maximally
Exposed Individual (MEI) as a result of exposure to emissions from an individual
facility. The definition of MEI contains an extremely conservative assumption
that the individual is continuously exposed to the highest possible annual
concentration throughout a lifetime span of 70 years, 365 days per year, 24 hours-
a-day. For the maximally exposed individual workers (employment population)
the assumed exposure is for 46 years of employment, 240 days-per-year, 8 hours-
per-day. 'There is an additional special provision requiring notification of affected
.,sensitive receptors" (schools, hospitals, day care centers, etc.) who are assumed to �.J
have 70-year continuous exposure.
For noncarcinogenic toxic exposure a corresponding trigger level is characterized
by a Hazard Index (HI) equal to 1.0 (0.5 for lead exposure). Hazard Index is
defined as the sum of an individual's daily intake from all routes of exposure for a
toxic contaminant divided by the acceptable daily intake for the contaminant.
2. Public Notification Letter from SCAQMD
Public notification will consist of notification letters mailed to every residence,
business and sensitive receptor containing persons theoretically exposed to a 10-
in-a-million risk. SCAQMD will develop the notification language for each
emitting facility and each facility is responsible for distributing the letters to the
addresses within the potentially exposed area. The letter will be written in both
English and Spanish. SCAQMD will evaluate if other non-English languages
should be used for the notification letter. Sanitation Districts' staff does not
anticipate that other languages will be declared necessary by the SCAQMD for
the neighborhoods adjacent to our two facilities.
2
The letter will identity our facilities by full name and address and will provide a
name and telephone number of a contact person at our facilities to answer
questions. The actual cancer risk value will not be stated in the letter. Instead,the increased chance of developing cancer will be referred to as greater than or
equal to 10-in-one-million, 100-in-one-million, etc.
For noncancer exposures, one letter for chronic health risk and another letter for
acute health risk is being proposed. However, SCAQMD is considering
consolidating these two letters. The letter will also contain an area map with a
zone of impact and a risk comparison graph or table containing other relative risk
information such as breathing background ambient air in the South Coast Basin
and breathing air while driving a car on the freeway.
3. Public Notification Letter from Emitting Facilities (Sanitation Districts)
All facilities, including the Sanitation Districts, will have the option to accompany
the SCAQMD letter with their own letter in the same envelope. The letter may
provide supplemental information, including the facility's efforts to reduce
emissions of toxic air contaminants. The facility letter must be reviewed and
approved by SCAQMD. Sanitation Districts' staff are in the early stage of
developing the content and format of the letter.
4. Public Notification Meetings and Library Reference Material
... In addition to notification letters, facilities must sponsor a public meeting at which
additional information about the facility's risk assessment report can be provided
and questions can be answered. The facility may announce the public meeting
and state the location, date and time in the notification letter. SCAQMD may
establish guidelines for the meeting and may send a representative to participate
in the meetings. One copy of the health risk assessment report must also be sent
to the closest public library and, if asked, to the library of any school within the
zone of impact.
5. Notification Schedule
The notification procedure must be initiated no later than 30 days after the health
risk assessment report has been approved by CAL-EPA. Since AB 2588 requires
facilities to submit thew Emissions Inventory Report every two years, the same
frequency is recommended for the notification procedure. Facilities with a cancer
risk of more than 100-in-one-million may be asked to notify the affected
population on a yearly basis if deemed necessary by SCAQMD.
3
Y
HOW THE SANITATION DISTRICTS ARE AFFECTED
Staff completed the initial AB 2588 Air Toxics Emission Inventory and health risk
assessment reports in June 1991. The reports were received by SCAQMD in December
1991 and have been sent to CAL-EPA for its consideration and approval. So far no
response has been received from CAL-EPA. It is our understanding that the large
number of reports combined with limited qualified CAL-EPA staff are responsible for
this protracted delay. Without CALEPA's final determination, Sanitation Districts'
staff can only estimate what is in store for us based on the preliminary results included in
our health risk assessment reports.
The basic conclusion of our reports is that among the more than 60,000 residents
surrounding our two treatment plants, only about 300 MEI households may be exposed
to a theoretical cancer risk greater than 10-in-a-million. For those approximately 300
households with a risk above the notification level, the Sanitation Districts will be
obligated to send them notification letters and to conduct a public meeting.
No workers have a theoretical cancer risk of greater than 10-in-a-million at either of our
two facilities or within businesses adjacent to our facilities.
No sensitive receptors (schools, hospitals, etc.) receive significant cancer risk due to
toxics emissions from our plants.
Non-carcinogenic health risk (acute and chronic) for both residential and working
population is much lower than the notification level established by SCAQMD. `✓
PROPOSED STEPS
1. Sanitation Districts' Worker Notification
Sanitation Districts' employees have expressed continuing interest in the results of
the AB 2588 testing program and potential health impacts on them. Fortunately,
we will be able to provide them with encouraging news because our employees
have neither carcinogenic nor non-carcinogenic health risks above the level
considered "significant".
Even though we are not obligated to notify them, staff proposes to conduct
briefing meetings for our employees to communicate the results of the AB 2588
testing program, discuss potential health affects and inform them about our efforts
to reduce our emissions and the resulting risk.
2. Public Notification
Approximately 300 residences are located within the 10-in-one-million zone of
impact (approximately 1/4 of a mile from our facilities' fencelines) and, therefore,
must be notified. Upon final approval of the Sanitation Districts' health risk
assessment report, staff proposes to prepare a letter, after collaboration with the 1�
4
1
r
SCAQMD, to the affected residents which will be included with the SCAQMD
letter (We were required to follow a similar public notification procedure as part
of our SCAQMD permitting requirements for the central power generating
facilities, and we sent out our own letter).
Our letter will provide information about our facilities, sources of toxic's emission
inside the plants, the reasons we have emissions, and a chart that puts our risk in
relative significance with many of the other common day-to-day risks we all
encounter. Our letter will also describe the emission reduction measures we have
already initiated as well as future emission reduction measures. Residents will
also be informed about the availability of the Sanitation Districts' health risk
assessment reports in the public libraries closest to our facilities. We will also
announce the public meetings (one for each of our facilities).
3. Public Meetings
The two public meetings should be organized at a time convenient for the
residents (e.g., weekends, evenings) and coordinated with SCAQMD whose
representative we will strongly recommend be present at the meetings. Sanitation
Districts' staff intends to conduct public meetings that will be informative, open
and honest. The meetings will be conducted at times and locations that will be
convenient and accessible to our neighbors. This will be a collaborative effort of
our technical and public information staff to assure the highest quality meetings
possible. Staff will also prepare written materials for distribution and discussion
during the meeting.
4. Cost of Program
Staff estimates the cost of the AB 2588 notification to be less than $10,000
(approximately $1,000 for letter preparation and distribution and about 200 hours
of staff time for development of materials and attending meetings). Funds are
already earmarked in the existing budget under an AB 2588 line item and all
tasks can be completed within existing staff authorities.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Staff requests concurrence of the proposed steps to comply with AB 2588 by the
Directors.
VK/cmc
Ref#: 240169.RP
5
POTWs and Air Quality Overview
• Historically, POTWs had to deal with odor
emissions and criteria pollutant emissions
• Late 1980's, toxics and reactive organic gas
emissions
• Risk assessments now required
• Larger POTWs tend to exceed threshold levels
considered "significant"
• Public notification now required
•Technology not established to control air toxics
Existing Air Toxic Legislation/Rules
• The Toxic Hot Spot Assessment and
Information Act of 1987 (AB 2588)
• SCAQMD Rule 1401 - New Source Review for
Carcinogens
Our Obligations Under SCAQMD Rule 1401 :
• Estimate carcinogenic emissions from new or
modified sources
e Model theoretical risk from emissions on
workers and community
• Install technology if threshold risk is exceeded
Our Obligations Under AB 2588:
• Inventory emissions from existing facilities
i Model theoretical risk impact from emissions
on workers and community
• Inform public of risk
What Has This Cost the Sanitation Districts?
SCAQMD Rule 1401
o Required for the following projects
Central generation (Plants 1 and 2)
Waste gas flares (Plants 1 and 2)
Primary treatment expansion (Plant 1 )
Secondary expansions (Plants 1 and 2)
o We have spent $600,000 in studies
o No cost for T-BACT to date
What Has This Cost the Sanitation Districts?
AB 2588
• 1990-91 sampling , analysis, modelling and
reporting cost $1 .1 million
• 1992 Biennial update $200,000
• Future biennial updates approximately $50,000
using more in-house work
What are our Future Obligations?
Mandatory
® Notify public under AB 2588
• New source review under SCAQMD Rule 1401
o Respond to new control mandates
Optional
• Reduce impact of toxic emissions on
community
• Reduce cost of complying with Air Quality
mandates
AB 2588 Public Notification Requirements
• Notification level is 10-in-a-million
• Mandatory SCAQMD letter
• Optional facility letter
• Mandatory public meetings
• Mandatory library copies
AB 2588 Notification
Staff's Proposal
• Prepare facility letter to accompany SCAQMD
letter and send to approximately 300
households
• Hold employee briefing meetings prior to
public meetings
• Hold two public meetings - Fountain Valley and
Huntington Beach
® Prepare written materials for meetings
AB 2588 Notification
Cost For Staff's Proposal
• Approximately $1 ,000 for mailings
• 200 staff hours for development of materials
and attending public meetings
• Funding under previous AB 2588 authorization
AB 2588 Notification
® No formal Board action required for
compliance, but staff is seeking concurrence
on proposed actions
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
eI ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
1084LA ELLIS AVENUE
GO BOX 8127
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,"LIFORNIA 92IM-0127
`III, 0 Ia1002-2a11
October 22, 1992
STAFF REPORT
AIR TOXICS, VOC, AND ODOR CONTROL
BIOFILTRATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
INTRODUCTION
The Sanitation Districts are faced with complying with local, state and federal regulations
that will limit the amount of toxic and volatile organic emissions from our treatment
plants. Within the next couple of years we will be required to develop a risk reduction
plan and implement control strategies to achieve specified emission reductions. Staff
believes that biofilters represent a promising technology for POTWs to cost-effectively
achieve required toxic and volatile organic emission reductions while mitigating any
potential odor problem. However, this technology must be proven before it can be
applied at our facilities, or at other POTWs. Staff is therefore recommending a
biofiltration demonstration project.
GRANT FUNDING
In previous discussions with the Directors pertaining to compliance with evolving air
quality regulations of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), the
California Air Resources Board (CARS) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), staff has been urged to seek funding from other sources, including the regulators,
for development of new control technologies. Staff has investigated other funding
sources for air toxics demonstration projects and has identified three potential sources
for funding a biofiltration demonstration project. Biofiltration is a promising control
technology for the treatment of POTW off-gases because of its potential to cost-
effectively remove not only toxics and VOCs, but also odorous compounds. Staff has
concluded that biofiltration is one control technology that is a good potential candidate
for application at our treatment plants.
The Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF), which is a nationally recognized
organization for funding research projects in the field of wastewater, and only recently
air quality, has indicated it is willing to help fund a research project at POTW to
demonstrate biofiltration technology for removing toxic and VOC emissions. The
Sanitation Districts' staff has submitted a proposal to WERF requesting $30,000 to
demonstrate this technology.
The Technology Advancement Office of the SCAQMD provides funding for new and
innovative projects. Sanitation Districts' staff believes that biofiltration will qualify as an
innovative technology based on preliminary discussions with SCAQMD staff.
SCAQMD's Technology Assessment Committee, consisting of three SCAQMD Board
members, has unanimously endorsed the project at a $125,000 funding level, and will
convey it to the full board for its consideration. If our proposal is accepted, SCAQMD
may fund up to almost one-half of the project cost.
In addition, Southern California Edison (SCE) is active in co-sponsoring innovative
research. Preliminary discussions with SCE staff indicate that they may be willing to co-
sponsor this study in an amount up to $50,000.
BIOFILTRATION TECHNOLOGY
Biofiltration is a gas treatment technology that utilizes microorganisms to biologically
degrade the VOC and toxic compounds that are contained in off-gases. It uses very little
energy other than a fan to evacuate the air space of the process unit and distribute it to
the biofilter, and a pump to occasionally flush the reactor to control pH, or feed
nutrients to the microorganisms. In biofiltration, off-gases are passed through a wet,
biologically active porous medium. Pollutants such as toxics, VOCs and hydrogen sulfide
pass from the air to the water in the biofilter where they are degraded by the
microorganisms.
The potential advantages of biofiltration are that the pollutants are converted to
harmless products, no hazardous residues are generated, and operating costs are
significantly lower than traditional treatment technologies such as the wet scrubbers we
presently use. In addition, biofilters do not require large amounts of energy or chemicals
(as do incinerators or scrubbers) or costly regeneration procedures (as activated carbon
does).
WHY WE SHOULD DEMONSTRATE THE FEASIBILITY OF BIOFILTRATION
Staff estimates that it costs us approximately $80,000 to $100,000 annually to operate and
maintain one packed tower scrubber, which is only effective in removing odorous
compounds. The Sanitation Districts operate thirty-three scrubbers. This amounts to an
annual operating cost of approximately $2.9 million. Staff does not know the cost of
operating a biofilter because there is not enough information available at this time.
However, we do know that biofilters require limited chemicals and energy and have few
mechanical parts that would require maintenance. Thus, staff anticipates that they would
be substantially cheaper to operate than scrubbers.
Biofilters are expected to remove not only odors, but toxic and smog-producing emissions
as well. This is very important because the EPA, CARE and SCAQMD are developing
2
rules that will require POTWs to control these emissions and to reduce risk to the
public.
For instance, SB 1731, which became law this year, will require all stationary sources that
emit significant quantities of toxic to develop and implement a risk reduction program.
In addition, SCAQMD has proposed Rule 1402 for adoption in early 1993. Rule 1402
would require the Sanitation Districts to develop and implement a risk-reduction
program for all of our existine facilities. Rule 1401, which was adopted in 1990, already
obligates us to control emissions from our new or modified facilities.
Although they are effective in mitigating odors, we know that our existing packed tower
scrubbers are ineffective in removing toxic and VOC pollutants. Therefore, we have
two options. Our first option is to install additional conventional scrubber control
technology such as activated carbon to remove the pollutants. This technology has a
high annual operating cost and results in the generation of a hazardous waste. The Los
Angeles County Sanitation Districts use this technology and they are facing increasingly
high disposal costs for the spent activated carbon. Our second option is to develop other
control strategies that are potentially more cost-effective, such as biofiltration, or other
means such as process modifications and/or upstream source control. If the Sanitation
Districts can demonstrate the reliability of biofiltration we could save millions of annual
operating dollars, reduce our liability associated with the disposal of a hazardous waste,
and comply with SCAQMD, CARB and EPA requirements.
STATUS OF BIOFILTER TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
The Europeans have utilized biofiltration for many years. In the United States, however,
the technology is in its early stages of development. Most of the work so far has focused
on soil bed biofilters to treat soil and/or groundwater contaminated with hydrocarbons.
Some work has been done on using biofilters (usually soil bed and compost) for treating
odors from wastewater pump stations. But little, if any, data is available on toxic and
VOC removal from these systems.
Researchers at several universities, including the University of Southern California
(USC), have been studying biofilters. Most of the research has been on hydrocarbon
removal. USC recently received a grant from the SCAQMD to evaluate biofilter
removal of hydrocarbons from leaking underground storage tanks. RMT Inc., an
environmental engineering consulting firm, has teamed up with a European-based firm to
evaluate the performance of biofilters in removing volatile organic air emissions from dry
cleaners and bakeries. The SCAQMD and SCE are funding these projects.
3
Biofiltration holds considerable promise for treating the high concentrations of toxic and
volatile organic pollutants found in industrial settings. However, the ability of biofilters
to remove the very low concentration of toxics and volatile organic compounds typically
present in POTW air emissions has not been demonstrated. Research on the optimum
support medium for the microorganisms, biofilter configuration, and removal
effectiveness is needed to determine whether biofiltration is a reliable technology for
POTWs. Staff concludes that because the cost of traditional control strategies is so
substantial, the expense of research is well justified.
PROPOSED PROTECT TEAM
Sanitation Districts' staff has prepared and submitted preliminary proposals to WERF,
SCAQMD and SCE to determine their willingness to fund biofilter research. Staff
anticipates that WERF and SCAQMD will make decisions on the proposals in
November 1992.
Because of the complexity of this project, outside resources and expertise are required.
Staff has identified a highly qualified team of professionals which consists of our in-house
air quality specialists, specialist on biofilters from the Civil Engineering Department of
USC and environmental engineers from Schaefer Dixon Associates, an environmental
engineering consulting firm. USC has a professor in their Civil Engineering Department
with considerable experience with biofilters, who has been successful in obtaining grants
from SCAQMD for biofilter research; and USC is relatively close (most researchers in
this field are either out of state or in northern California). Schaefer Dixon Associates
(SDA) was identified because our proposal to WERF emphasized evaluating European
biofiltration technology to which SDA has direct access because of their affiliation with
Huntingdon West, a London-based engineering firm. SDA also has experience with
biotechnology related to treatment of contaminated soil.
PROPOSED PROTECT
The proposal demonstration project consists of five steps:
Step I - Literature Search and Review
Step II - Development of Experimental Protocol
Step III - Bench-Scale Testing Program
Step IV - Pilot-Scale Testing Program
Step V - Conceptual Design Report and Cost Estimates for a Full-Scale
Biofilter
The first required step is a review of existing United States and overseas literature
pertaining to biofiltration. Next would be to develop detailed protocols to test the
performance of bench-scale and pilot-scale biofilters. A site adjacent to the headworks
scrubbers at our Fountain Valley plant is proposed as the test site. If the biofilters prove
effective and reliable, the final step in this phase would be to develop a conceptual
4
design and cost estimates for a full-scale biofilter. It is anticipated that the
demonstration project will have a duration of one-and-a-half years.
Upon completion of this demonstration project, the Sanitation Districts would likely
pursue funding from WERF, SCAQMD, CARB, EPA or private interests; and solicit
proposals to design, construct and test the performance of a full-scale biofilter at our
treatment plant. The conceptual design report will provide sufficient information to fully
describe the necessary parameters of a full-scale biofilter.
ESTIMATED COST AND FUNDING
Staff estimates the total cost of the project at $280,000. This cost and anticipated
funding is broken down as follows:
DEMONSTRATION PROJECT COST
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
Internal Sanitation Districts' Labor $62,000
(includes benefits and overhead)
�..i Equipment and Materials $ 39,000
Travel $ 5,000
Subcontracts
1. USC $ 80,800
2. Schaefer Dixon Associates $ 3,200
3. Outside Analytical Laboratory $ 65,000
4. Construction Services $ 25,000
Total $280.000
DEMONSTRATION PROJECT FUNDING
SOU RC AMOUNT
SCAQMD $124,568
WERF $ 30,000
SANITATION DISTRICTS $125.432
Total 280 000
5
Staff estimates approximately 1,100 staff hours will be spent on this project over the one-
and-a-half-year period. Equipment and material costs include purchase of two pilot scale
biofilters, air blowers, flow regulators, sampling canisters, cleaning equipment and
miscellaneous equipment and supplies. Staff has budgeted $65,000 to conduct contract
analytical testing for which we currently have no in-house capabilities. The budget for
constructing the support facilities that will house the bench and pilot-scale biofilters is
$25,000.
In addition, staff has discussed funding with SCE, who may fund up to $50,000 for the
project. If all of the requested amount of funding is approved, the cost to the Sanitation
Districts for this project may be as low as $76,000.
RECOMMENDATIONS
If the Directors concur with staffs recommendations, the following actions would be
appropriate:
1) Authorize staff to conduct the biofiltration demonstration project to study the
performance of biofdters for treating toxic, volatile organic and odorous
compounds from our off-gases.
2) Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with USC for services pertaining to the
biofiltration demonstration project in an amount not to exceed $80,800.
3) Authorize staff to secure the services of construction contractors to construct the
necessary support facilities to conduct pilot testing of the biofiltion demonstration
project (estimated amount is $25,000).
4) Authorize staff to secure the services of contract analytical laboratories in
accordance with established procurement procedures, to conduct the necessary
testing pertaining to the biofiltration demonstration project (estimated amount is
$65,000).
5) Authorize staff to enter into a grant agreement with SCAQMD for partial funding
of the biofiltration demonstration project in the amount of $124,568.
6) Authorize staff to enter into a grant agreement with the Water Environment
Research Foundation for partial funding of the biofiltration demonstration project
in the amount of $30,000.
6
Note that the services required of Schaefer Dixon Associates (estimated amount is
$3,200), is within staffs exacting procurement authority in accordance with established
procurement procedures.
Staff will report back to the Directors after receiving notice from WERF and SCAQMD
prior to proceeding with the project. Also, if SCE indicates an interest in participating,
staff will report back and request authority to enter into a grant agreement with SCE,
which could reduce the Sanitation Districts' costs from about $125,000 to about $76,000.
EMT/cmc
Ref#: 240170.RP
Air Toxics Control Technology
Why Should We Develop Short and Long-Term
Strategies to Reduce Toxic Air Emissions?
• Existing and emerging federal , state and
regional requirements
• Informed community
• Present high cost of existing control
technology and limited development of new
control technology
Air Toxics Coi _ _rol Technology
Legislative/Re ulatory Mandates
• Federal Clean Air Act Standards
90% reduction mandated
1995 deadline for development of regulations
for POTWS
• California SB 1731
Requires air districts to define "significant"
risk
Requires facilities to develop risk reduction
plan by July 1993
Implement risk reduction measure within five
years
Air Toxics Control Technology
Leg islative./Rea ulatory Mandates
• SCAQMD Rule 1401
- Requires measurement, modelling and risk
assessment
- New expansions will continue to trigger this
rule
- Significant Risks will trigger installation of
technology
Air Toxics Control Technology
Legislative /Regulatory Drivers Mandates
• SCAQMD proposed rules
1401 . 1
- New source review for non-carcinogens
- Will increase compliance costs associated
with capital development projects
1402
- Establishes existing facility risk levels
- Requires facilities to develop risk reduction
plan
- implement risk reduction measures
within three years
Air Toxics Control Technology
Reasons to Evaluate Cost Effective Control
Strategies
• Federal requirement to install MACT is
technology based not risk based
• Technologies may be available that reduce
costs for removing odorand also control toxic
emissions
• Sanitation Districts spend approximately
$3 million annually operating odor control
scrubbers
Air Toxics Co'k . ,rol Technology
Control Strategies Available To POTWs
• Traditional control strategies
- Often not cost-effective
- Cross-media impacts
• Untraditional control strategies
- Should be focus of POTWs risk
reduction program
- Requires research to define performance
and reliability
Air Toxics Control Technology
Traditional Control Strategies Available to POTWs
• scrubbers
• incineration
e condensation
• Often not cost-effective
• Limited effectiveness
• Cross-media impacts
Air Toxics Col . ..rol Technology
Potential Control Strategies Available to POTWs
• Looking for cost-effective solution
- Source control
- Operational modifications
- Physical modifications
Biofiltration
• Should be focus of POTW's risk reduction
program
• Requires research to define performance,
reliability and cost
Air Toxics Control Technology
Research On Potential Control
Strategies
• Required to cost-effectively implement risk
reduction measures
• May have secondary benefit in reducing
emissions of other pollutants of concern
• Usually requires significant lead-time to
complete; therefore,
Staff proposes to undertake research on
biofiltration
Air Toxics Cot .rol Technology
Biofiltration Technology
• Vapor-phase treatment technology
• Biological process for removing odors, toxics
and VOCs with microorganisms
• No or limited cross-media impact
• Low operating costs
Air Toxics Control Technology
Pro Posed Biofiltration Project
• Demonstration project consists of five steps:
-Literature search and review
II -Development of Experimental Protocol
III -Bench-scale testing program
IV -Pilot-scale testing program
V -Conceptual design report and cost
estimates for a full-scale biofilter
Air Toxics Cot .rol Technology
Proposed Biofiltration Project
O Test removal efficiency for
- Hydrogen sulfide
- Reactive organic compounds
- Toxics
• Plant 1 headworks is the proposed test site
Air Toxics Control Technology
Proposed Biofiltration Project Team
• Sanitation Districts
• University of Southern California
• Schaefer Dixon Associates
• Analytical Laboratory
Air Toxics Coi . _rol Technology
Proposed Biofiltration Project Schedule
• Project Duration - 1 .5 years
• Begin work in December 1992
S Complete work in April-May 1994
Air Toxics Control Technology
Proposed Biofiltration Pro"ect Cost
Description Cost
Internal Labor
and benefits $62 ,000
Travel $59000
Equipment & Materials $39,000
Contract services
• USC $805800
• SDA $ 35200
• Laboratory $655000
• Construction
contractor 25 000
TOTAL 280 000
(
' Air Toxics Col . .rol Technology
Proposed Biofiltration Pro"ect - Expected
Outcome
• Demonstrate reliability of biofiltration to remove
low concentration of toxic & VOC emissions
• Develop engineering parameters necessary to
design full-scale biofilter
• Pursue funding to design and construct full-
scale biofilter
Air Toxics Control Technology
Proposed Biofiltration Project - Expected
Outcome
s Cost effective control strategy for POTWs
• May satisfy BACT and MACT requirements
• A technology with limited cross-media impacts
Air Toxics Col .rol Technology
Proposed Biofiltration Project Funding
• Proposals for co-funding were sent to :
- Water Environment Research
Foundation
- South Coast Air Quality Management
District
Air Toxics Control Technology
Proposed Biofiltration Project Funding
• Expect decisions on funding in November, if
proposals are accepted , distribution would be
as follows:
Source Cost Percent
SCAQMD $1249568 45
WERF $ 30 ,000 11
Sanitation
Districts $1255432 44
• Southern California Edison has also expressed
interest in project. No funding decision at this
time .
i
Air Toxics Control Technology
Staff Recommendations
• Authorize staff to conduct the biofiltration
demonstration project to study the performance
of biofilters for treating toxic, volatile organic
and odorous compounds from our off-gases
• Authorize staff to enter into an agreement with
USC for services pertaining to the biofiltration
demonstration project in an amount not to
exceed $80 ,800
Air Toxics Control Technology
Staff Recommendations
• Authorize staff to secure the services of
construction contractors to construct the
necessary support facilities to conduct pilot
testing of the biofiltration demonstration project
(estimated amount is $25 ,000)
• Authorize staff to secure the services of
contract analytical laboratories in accordance
with established procurement procedures to
conduct the necessary testing pertaining to the
biofiltration demonstration project (estimated
amount is $65,000)
Air Toxics Control Technology
Staff Recommendations
® Authorize staff to enter into a grant agreement
with SCAQMD for partial funding of the
biofiltration demonstration project in the
amount of $124,568
• Authorize staff to enter into a grant agreement
with the Water Environment Research
Foundation for partial funding of the
biofiltration demonstration project in the
amount of $30,000
Air Toxics Control Technology
Staff Recommendations
• Staff will report back to the Boards on the grant
applications from SCAQM ® , WERF and SCE
COUNTY SANITATION DISTNICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
RE: AGENDA ITEM NO . 13
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
October 29 , 1992 PO BO[Bfn
FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIAOUWA 92728.B122
91u962.2a11
REPORT OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: October 29 , 1991 -- 5 : 30 p.m.
COMMITTEE MEMBERS: STAFF PRESENT:
Present: J. Wayne Sylvester,
General Manager
Norman E. Culver, Chairman Thomas M. Dawes,
Fred Barrera Director of Engineering
John Collins Blake P. Anderson,
Barry Denes Director of Technical
Don R. Griffin Services
Eva G. Miner
Carrey Nelson
Richard Partin
Charles Sylvia
Jim Wahner
James Flora
Jack Kelly
Jim Silva
...� Absent:
Miguel Pulido
1 . ACTIONS RE OPERATIONS CENTER EXPANSION AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB
90. P2-23-5-1 .
On October 6 , nine bids were received for the expansion of
the existing Operations Center at Plant No. 2 . The work
included the addition of new locker rooms, offices, and
remodeling of existing rooms, as well as a cart storage area.
Since the bid opening, three protests have been submitted by
The Gorham Co. , Corona, CA, second low bidder; Lewis Jorge
Construction Management Inc. , Baldwin Park, CA, third low
bidder; and Dover Elevator Company, Anaheim, CA. , a supplier.
Dover has since withdrawn their protest.
Enclosed is a Staff Report dated October 22, 1992 (tan)
which provides additional information and copies of
correspondence received on the bid.
Counsel has recommended that we reject the low bid (see
attached Memorandum dated October 23 , 1992) . Staff has
..r
recommended rejecting all bids and rebidding the project.
Report of the Building Committee '
October 29, 1992
Page Two
Following a discussion regarding the protests and the options
available to the Districts relative to awarding the bid to the
second low bidder versus rejecting all bids and rebidding the
project, the following actions were recommended.
Recommendation•
1 . That the Boards approve Addenda 1 and 2 to the plans
and specifications for Operations Center Expansion at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 . The addenda provide
additional technical clarification to the plans and
specifications and extend the date for receipt of bids.
2. That the Boards reject all bids, and authorize the
General Manager to establish the bid date for Job No.
P2-23-5-1(Rebid) . A tentative bid date of December 8,
1992 is anticipated.
2. TOUR OF NEW CENTRAL LABORATORY
The new Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17 , is complete and
was accepted by the Directors at the last Board meeting. A
short tour of the facility was conducted. The members that went
on the tour were pleased with the facility.
TMD:jt
ENG/BLOG.C"/BCR.1092
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
AI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
October 22, 1992 +QBC<ELLIS AVENUE
00 8Z 9127
FWNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA 92728.8127
n1n962.2A11
STAFF REPORT
Protests Filed on
Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2
Job No. P2-2 -5-1
This project, the expansion of the Operations Center at Plant No. 2, includes
the addition of new locker rooms, offices and remodeling existing rooms, as well
as the addition of a cart storage area. On October 6, 1992, nine bids were
received, ranging from a high of $3,238,400 to a low of $2,537,193 submitted by
Javaid Contractors, Inc.
Since the bid opening three protests have been received from general counsel for
The Gorham Co. , the second low bidder (pink attachment) , Lewis Jorge
Construction Management Inc, the third low bidder (gray attachment) and Dover
Elevator Company, a supplier (salmon attachment). Dover Elevator Company has
since withdrawn their protest (green attachment).
The protests are based on two separate issues. The first is bidding
irregularities contained in the low bidder's proposal alleging violations of the
Public Contracts Code Section 4100 which requires that the prime contractor list
the name, license number and location of each subcontractor who will perform
work or labor or render service to the General Contractor in or about the
construction of the improvements in an amount in excess of one-half of one
percent of the General Contractor's total bid, and the portion (type) of the
work which will be done by each subcontractor. The second issue is the lack of
bonding capacity by the Surety listed on the low bidder's proposal.
In addition to the above protests, correspondence has been received (purple
attachment) from the Center for Contract Compliance alleging violations of Labor
Code 1774 (payment of prevailing wages) by the low and second bidders on other
jobs within this region, and substantially more severe allegations against the
second bidder ranging from poor workmanship and excessive change order requests
to actual termination of contract by another agency in Southern California.
Counsel has reviewed the protests and the allegations and has submitted an
opinion dated October _, 1992 (ivory).
In light of all the complex issues which could arise by awarding this contract
to the low bidder, staff and Counsel are recommending that all bids be rejected
and the project rebid at the earliest possible date after approval of the plans
and specifications which will incorporate the changes in Addenda 1 and 2 as
Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1(Rebid).
SR.1092.2
LEVINE & ERIKSEN
ATTORNEYN AT LAW
�RCO LfRIRBEN 2660NORTH 5ANTIAOO BOULEVARD
MARC R.LEVINE ORANGE,CALIFORNIA 92667
ANTHONY C-MORGA'i TELEPHONE 1714)974-0100
FAC£IMII•n PII41974.6972
VIA U.S. MAIL AND
FACSIMILE 0 14) 962-5018
October 7, 1992
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92728-8127
Attention: Tom Dawes
Re.: Our Client: The Gorham Company, Inc.
Project: Operations Center Expansion Plant No. 2
Subject: Protest of Bid Submitted by
Javaid Contractors, Inc.
Dear Mr. Dawes:
our firm is general counsel to The Gorham Company. We have been
asked to review the bids submitted to the Orange County
Sanitation District in connection with the above-referenced
project, our review indicates that the apparent low bidder for
the project is Javaid Contractors, Inc. The apparent second low
bidder is The Gorham Company, Inc. A review of the Javaid bid
indicates certain irregularities which in our opinion render
their bid unresponsive.
Pages 8 of your Proposed Form of Bid for the above-referenced
project states the applicable law with respect to this issue in
the bid document. This language is derived from Public Contracts
Code Section 4100 and states:
"Any officer, department, board or commission
taking bids for the construction of any
public work or improvement shall provide in
the specifications prepared for the work or
improvement or in the general conditions
under which bids will be received for the
doing of the work incident to the public work
or improvement that any person making a bid
or offer to perform the work, shall, in hie
or her bid or offer, set forth: (a) The name
and the location of the place of business of
each subcontractor who will perform work or
_C�11VC b LM11hJ C�V i. i14�Oi ti"'OJi � IJ� i 111 I I i.0 .II+ . �
County Sanitation Districts of orange County
Attn: Tom Dawes
Re: our Client: The Gorham Company, Inc.
Project: operations Center Expansion Plant No. 2
Subject: Protest of bid submitted by Javaid Contractors, Ina.
Page Two
October 7, 1992
labor or render service to the prime
contractor in or about the construction of
the work or improvement, or a subcontractor
licensed by the State of California who,
under subcontract to the prime contractor,
specially fabricates and installs a portion
of the work or improvement according to
detailed drawings contained in the plans and
specifications, in an amount in excess of 1/2
of 1t of the prime contractor's total bid or,
in the case of bids or offers for the
construction of streets or highways,
including bridges, in excess of 1/2 of 1t of
the prime contractor's total bid or
$10,000.00, whichever is greater. $'
Public Contract Code requires the County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County to utilize competitive bidding after publication of
notices inviting bids when the amount of work is in a sum such as
that involved in this project.
Javaid Contractors, Inc. 's bid fails to list the subcontractors
who are to perform the following categories of work:
1. Dewatering. 7. Toilet Accessories.
2. Demolition. S . Elevator Installation.
9 . Reber. 9. Lockers and Benches.
4. Acoustical Ceilings. 10. Fire Sprinkler.
5. Toilet Partitions. 11. Site utilities.
6. Shower Partitions. 12. Roll-Up Grilles.
Public Contracts Code Section 4106 states that:
"If a prime contractor fails to specify a
subcontractor or if a prime contractor
specifies more than one subcontractor for the
same portion of work to be performed under
County sanitation Districts of Orange County
Attn: Tom Dawes
Re: Our Client: The Gorham Company, Inc.
Project: Operations Center Expansion Plant No. 2
Subject: Protest of bid submitted by Javaid Contractors, Inc.
Page Three
October 7 , 1992
contract in excess of 1/2 of It of the prime
contractor's total bid, the prime contractor
agrees that he or she is fully qualified to
perform that portion himself or herself, and
that the prime contractor shall perform that
portion himself or herself."
"If after award of contract, the prime
contractor subcontracts, except as provided
for in Sections 4107 or 4109, any such
portion of the work, the prime contractor
shall be subject to the penalties named in
Section 4111. "
Public Contracts Code Section 4109 provides that:
r..� "Subletting or subcontracting of any portion
of the work in excess of 1/2 of 1% of the
prime contractor's total bid as to which no
subcontractor was designated in the original
bid shall only be permitted in cases of
public emergency or necessity, and then only
after a finding reduced to writing as a
public record of the awarding authority
setting forth the facts constituting the
emergency or necessity."
It is the reasonable belief of The Gorham Company that Javaid
Contractors, Inc. does not intend to, nor do they have the
qualifications to, perform the trades for which they have failed
to list subcontractors as set forth above. It is believed that
each of these particular portions of the construction work will
exceed in value one-half (1/2) of one percent (14) of the total
contract amount. From practical experience, I can confidently
state that an elevator manufacturer will only supply elevator
equipment to a project if the manufacturer is permitted also to
install it. I cannot see any rational basis under which Javaid
Contractors, Inc. or the County Sanitation Districts of orange
County believes that Javaid Contractors, Inc. will provide and
install the .elevator equipment in this project. themselves. I am
sure you can draw the same reasonable conclusions regarding the
other unlisted categories.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Attn: Tom Dawes �..i
Re: Our client: The Gorham Company, Inc.
Project: Operations Center Expansion Plant No. 2
Subject: Protest of bid submitted by Javaid Contractors, Inc.
Page Four
October 7, 1992
As I am sure you are aware, the subcontractor listing law was
enacted by the legislature based on their finding that the
practice of job bidding and bid pedaling in connection with the
construction of public improvements deprives the public of the
full benefits of fair competition among prime contractors and
subcontractors. In fact, this legislative finding is set forth
in Public Contracts Code Section 4101. Furthermore, a stiff
penalty is provided in the Public Contracts Code for those prime
contractors who choose to circumvent the requirement of listing
subcontractors. I would refer you above to the quotation from
Public Contracts Code section 4106 which refers to Public
Contracts Code Section 4110. That section provides a penalty
against the prime contractor who violates this subcontractor
listing law of having their contract canceled or the prime
contractor assessed a penalty in an amount of not more than ten
percent (104) of the amount of the subcontract involved. A
violation of this particular subcontractor listing law also
subjects Javaid Contractors, Inc. to disciplinary action by the
Contractors State License Board pursuant to Public contracts Code
Section 4111.
The Gorham Company, in submitting its bid to the County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County, strictly complied with all
laws regulating the presentation of their bid. In lieu of this,
they are the lowest "responsible" bidder on this project. By
this letter, we are hereby requesting that you reject the bid of
Javaid Contractors, Inc. My client trusts that the County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County will continue to uphold the
legislative intent of Public Contracts Code with respect to
competitive bidding and subcontractor listing laws.
Also, as shown by the enclosed copy of the Federal Register dated
July 1, 1992, M.C.A. Insurance Company has an Underwriting
Linitation of $2,397,000.00. The bid submitted by Javaid
Contractors, Inc. was $2 ,537, 193.00. Therefore, Javaid will not
be able to provide bonds under these conditions.
we would appreciate your communication to this office of your
intention with respect to this matter so that appropriate action
may be taken on my client's behalf.
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Attn: Tom Dawes
Re: Our Client: The Gorham Company, Inc.
Project: Operations Center Expansion Plant No. 2
Subject: Protest of bid submitted by Javaid Contractors, Inc.
Page Five
October 7, 1992
I trust you will take the appropriate action.
ycu "' er truly,
M• r R. virie
M :mw
cc: The Gorham Company
29880 Fedend Rphtse I Val, 57. No. IV / Wedne.d■y, July i. 7o01 / Notion
s,ratcoru ORNMRAL IltsinkXCt CO"AWY. BUSINESS ADDRESS:
2330 Whiteford Road, York, ?A 17402. UNDERWRITING
LIMITATION b/: $bell/ 000. SURETY LICENSES O/: AL, GA, ID, IN,
IA, KS, KF, LA, MD, MS. NO, NE, NV, NM, ND, ON, OR, PA, SC,
SD, TN, UT, VA, WV, WY. INCORPORATEt TH: Pennaylvenia.
Lendea AssuraAes et Anoxiea Ina. (The) .5/
BUSINESS ADDRESS: 10 East 50th Street, 27th Floor, NOW York,
NY 10022. UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $17,185,000.
SURETY LICENSES C/t AS, IA, ME, MI, MN, NJ, NY, ND, ON, UT,
VT. INCORPORATED IN: Now York.
Luxbsxashs Mutual Casualty OsmpaaY, BUSINESS ADDRESS:
1 Kemper Drive, Long Grove, IL 50049-0001. UNDERWRITING
LIMITATION b/: 4105,148,000. SURETY LICENSES C/: AL, AK, AZ,
AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, DC, FL, CA, MI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY,
LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, NO, N^, N8, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY,
MC, ND, ON, 09, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, IN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA,
WV, WI, WY. INCOMRAT£D IN: Illinois.
MASS40husetts say Insuraaos Cmpany. BUSINESS ADDRESS:
100 North Parkway, Worcester, MA 01605. UNDERWRITING
LIMITATION b/t $1,307,900. SURETY LICENSES a/: At,, AR, CA, CO,
CT, DC, FL, GA, IL, IN, IA, KS, XY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN,
MS, NO, NE, NC, NJ, NY, NC, ON, OK, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VT,
VA, WA, WV, WI. INCORPORATED IN: Massachusetts.
NOA Insurance CGspeh . BUSINESS ADDRESS:
484 Central AveDus, Newark, NJ 07107-2096. UNDERWRITING
LIMITATION b/: $2,397,000. SURETY LICENSES c/t AL, AX, AZ, AR,
CA, CO, CT, DE, DC. FL, GA, NI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, TY, LA,
ME, MD, MA, NI, MN, MS, No, MT, WE, NV, NH, NJ, NM, NY, we,
ND, ON, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, WA, WV,
WI, WY. INCORPORATED IN: Oklahoma.
Merchants Beading Company (Mutual) . BUSINESS ADDRESS:
2100 Grand AVsnua, Dee Moines, IA 50312 . UNDERWRITINO
LIMITATION b/: $922,000. SURETY LICENSES 0/9 AL, AZ, CA, CO,
FL, GA, ID, I , IN, IA, KS, LA, M1, 10, NO, MT, NE, NV, NM,
NC. ND, OK, 01, PA, 90, TX, UT, VA, WA, WI, WY.
INCORPORATED IN: IOWR.
Miohigan Killers Mutual Insurance COAPUY.
BUSINESS ADDRESS: Post Office Box 30060, Laming, MI 4890t .
UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $6,352, 000. SURETY LICENSES c/:
AZ, AR, CA, CO, DC, FL, 10, IN, KS, KY, MI, No, NE, NJ, NY,
NO, ON, OK, PA, TX, UT, VA, WA. INCORPORATED :0; Michigun.
See Footnotes at and of circular.
TOTOL P.OB
LEWIS JORGE
October 6, 1992
Ms. Rita J. Brown
Secretary
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 1
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
RE: Project No. P2-23-5-1
Dear Ms. Brown:
Please accept this letter as our formal protest regarding the
competitive bids received for the Operations Expansion at Plant No.
2. The apparent (2) low bidder's did not completely list all of the
required information on the bid form. They have excluded the
subcontractors license number either in part or entirely for each
trade. Therefore, we feel that these two bids should be disqualified
for non compliance with the bid form requirements.
Please advise me of the pending action which the Board of Directors
will take on this matter.
Very truly yours,
LEWIS JORGE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC.
Robert M. Lewis
President
RML/sm
5140 Commerce Drm•901e91a Pars-CA•91706•i818)814.4727 •Fay(818)814-3048 •License'8.473790•General Connacror/Consmrdion Manager
- .: ,.m "ROM DOVEICO ORAPIGE CiY RO2.'02
ELEVATORS
DOWER ELEVATOR COMPANY
280E flloeer Way
Anaheim, calltornle SM
(71 4)68E-Ml
Fur:(711)ON-2078
October 8 , 1992
county Sanitation
District of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain. Valley, CA 92728-8127
Attn: Tom Dawes
Subject: Water Treatment Plant Operation Center Building
Dear John:
This letter is to inform you, that Dever Elevator company, is in
protest of Javaid contractors being awarded a contract for the
Water Treatment Plant Operation Center Building in Huntington
Beach. Our office phoned in a bid for the proposed elevator to
Javaid Contractors on October 6, 1992 , but they still failed to
list an elevator contractor in their bid. since Javaid Contrac-
tors can not build an elevator without an elevator contractor, we
do not understand how they will be able to fulfill your contract
requirements. Dover Elevator Company asks that you please recon-
sider Javaid Contractors proposed bid, before you choose to award
them a contract.
Sincerely,
Dover Elevatoor� Company
�I /�
Gro
Rocco Aracri
Sales Representative
10-16-22 '10:24 PM FROM DOYEICO ORANGE CTY F02/02
1 EUVATORS
DOWER ELEVATOR COMPANY
2M Ricker Way
Anaheim, California OM
p14)"0-1331
Pax:(714)004078
October 16, 1992
county Sanitation District of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728-8127
ATTH$ Tom Dawes
SUBJ: Water Treatment Plant Operation Center Building
Huntington Beach, CA
Dear Tom$
This letter is to inform you, that Dover Elevator Company has
been in contact with Javaid contractors, in regards to the Water
Treatment Plant Operation Center located in Huntington Beach, CA.
Javaid Contractors has informed us, that they had every intent to
list an elevator contractor on the proposed project. Javaid Con-
tractors did not list an elevator contractor in their bid be-
cause, they felt that the cost of the elevator would be less than
1\2%, which would not have required them to list an elevator con-
tractor. Javaid Contractors has informed Dover Elevator Company,
that they will issue us a contract for the proposed elevator, if
they are awarded the contract. Dover Elevator company apologizes
for any misunderstanding that our protest letter may have caused
and would have no objections to working with Javaid Contractors
on this project.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
,,,,"��
�
Rocco /yrJ
sari
�� Sales Representative
•R
M A N q
9 p QF
� 0 4
z
9
9 �+
October 15, 1992 , r E P Jew
CENTER FOR CONTRACT COMPLIANCE
Mr. Carrillo
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Ave
Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
"Absolute Privilege"
RE: Water Treatment Plant Operation Center Bldg Expansion
@ Plant 2 (P22351)
CONTRACTOR: Javaid Contractors Inc
Dear Mr. Carrillo:
As you may be aware, the Center for Contract Compliance
(CCC) is a non-profit organization concerned with those
laws that govern public works construction. To achieve
this objective, the CCC works closely with awarding
agencies entrusted with the enforcement of those laws.
one of the services the CCC offers awarding agencies are
the results of our investigations which include, but are
not limited to, on-site worker interviews, Certified
Payroll Record audits, past violations (Labor Code, Public
Contract Code, License, etc. . . ) and numerous other types
of information that are compiled during those thorough
investigations. That information, of course, can be
critically useful in an awarding agencies contract
decision making process.
The purpose of this letter is to inform your agency that
some discrepancies have been discovered concerning the
above referenced contractors "Sub-List". Please review
the following:
Contractor Portion of Work
Tri-Con Earthwork & Concrete
Attached You will find copies of "Stop Notices" issued by
the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement against
Tri-Con the listed subcontractor of record for Javaid
Contractors Inc. , the apparent low bidder.
Please note the amounts are rather large and all are for
non-payment of prevailing wage, showing a continuous
history of total disregard for the Public Works Labor
Code.
205 W. Fin!Street. Suite 104 0 Tustin CA 92680• i714 730.9620 0 Fax (7141730.964"
v
U
Contractor Portion of Work
McKinney Construction Steel Stud/Drywall & Plastering
Once again we've attached copies of a "Stop Notice" issued
by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement against
McKinney Construction another listed subcontractor of
record for Javaid Contractors Inc. , the apparent low
bidder.
This is proof and verification of the findings of our
on-site interviews which deemed that McKinney Construction
does not pay prevailing wage.
Due to the facts and information provided, the Center for
Contract Compliance requests that Javaid Contractors Inc.
be deemed "Non Responsive" and they be removed as the "Low
Bidder" for this project.
It is our pleasure to work with agencies such as yours to
insure equity and fair play in the competitive bid
process. Working together, we can insure that all
"Le itimate" contractors have a chance when bidding
against less scrupulous ones.
Thank you for your stringent attention to this matter and
i am looking forward to your response.
If you have any questions regarding our investigation,
please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
CENTER FOR CONTRACT COMPLIANCE
Alex Esparza
Field Investigator
AE/rp
cc: Mr. Jim Lintern, Director, CCC
Mr. Roger Miller, Regional Manager, USE
Legal Council
�ABOR COMMISSIONER,STATE OF CALIFORNIA
eefnmanl of Indugrifl Relations
Ow.den or Label standard\Entafcement'
B 1 OF FIELD ENFORCEMENT C 1 v D
IA_ JlN IlO.Ow.f, Will Recto MAR 1 o +NOusr,�
los Moak. a M32 3 1992 ♦ .....wfu: .,,,4!
pth 49C+FRlt 897-2905 4'1 '
C.C.C_
r State of California, Dept. of Gen. Serv.
Office-of the State Architect
400 r'PI' St., 5th Fl. °ar cALtrpP
.Sacramento, CA 95814
L _1
e.rv, —•�. �.-- ...u.•,ease re a�:: :.—T'_....
March 12, 1992 26-PW-21715/739
NOTICE TO WITHHOLD
f x.xs r ee4i...f
Leo Carrillo Stato Bunch - Campground to-finb, - CIMLrn:t 10777
.0 etexr�i.e fni.��_ ._.-..«.._ .�..-.��.- .� �.... .. ... .. .. .. ... .... ...
Triton, Inc. (4181 Sunsweps Dr. , Sfodio City, CA 911`04)
SouthueAt Buitdera Clod), Inc. ( 11344 - 6L6 St. , 1102. Sfmin Muuicn, CA 91)401)
i
Eoclosrd are a NO'riCE OF WAGES OWED and NOTICE OF ITNAI : Y ASSESSMENT pertaining for
the above•named protect.
You re doected to withhold and retain from any paymentsj�ee due ilia t wral cn NW nlimlor the total nutt
of S�01,101.85. whim .s the sum of all wades and ppanallics Iotfeilod putsuanl to the provienns of
Labor Coda Section 1727 as evudonced by the attached pinlice ill Wag#%Ovend anrd Notice($) of N.natfy
Assessment.
IL /ou receive notice of a suit filed by the contractor to recover the prevailing wages and/or the Penalties
La at Code Section 1731 requires you retain the above stated sum pending the outcome of the suit. It
no such notice of suit is received within the 90 day AS office.
cesfap.tn acceptance,or compietion of
the project, all monies withheld shall be remitted to AS office. If within the aloremenlioned period• the
contractor consents in writing with the Notice of Wages Owed and/or Nrttice of Penally Assessment, the
amount withheld shall be remitted to this office.
I declare under penalty of perjury ay follows: I am an authorized rep.esentalive acting for the State
Labor Commissioner. 1 exacule this Declaration on behalf of the worAr•,s whose names all. set forth on
Ill* attached AOtices. I have read the foragniog Notice !o Withhold and I have made an imesltg7lion
of the facts relating thereto• and based on all the facts known to me at this time and based an all o111he
statements and information given to me at this time. I am informed and believe that the foregoing
Notice to Withhold Is true and correct, and that the facts have been found to support this Notice.
Sincerely.
STATE LABOR COMMISSIONER
By
t4aa.CC—.':ae .......
Labor Standards Investigator
aw ,t nlol NOf,te fO wIINNOLO
LABOR COMMISSIONER, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I I'
Daparfinent of Imru6lnal Relaoone
DIVISION OF LABOR STANDARDS ENFORCEMENT I I t
Bureau of Palo Enforcement Sr,N� °` {y ^`
t07S0ne6roadivay,Rm4iIiII1iSb!9
Los AnSelea,CA 90012(;aS)Sf1y^-df&f
—. Q J
tF .0
r LAS VIRCENRS MUNICIPAL 'WATER DISTRICT
ATTN : DAVID R. LIPPMAN
4232-LAS VIRCENES ROAD
L CALABASAS, CA 91302-1994 J
JULY 29, 1992 2ti-PN-21715/739
NOTICE OF PENALTY ASSESSMENT
REC . F4C. EYPNS . LY , SLUDGE FORCE PAIR
r .c OUTNNFST BUILDLNG CLUB, INC. +
T ICON OENF.RAL BUILDING-Co _ _ _—_— _"_' _
This office has determined that the above-named contractorlsl has faired to pay the prevailing wages as
mQuired by Labor Code Sections 1774 ana 1815 to laborers ana!or mechanics engaged in the
execution of the above public works contract. Therefore, the following assessment is made per Labor
Code Sections 1775 and 1813:
158A) Penalties for straight time work paid it!less than the prevailing-sage(ale atS25per
worker per day per violation equals S22�20_9
-U rs L Penalties for overtime worked but not paid at me premium prevailing wage rate at
$25 per worker per day per violation equals S 1 .850.00
Penalties for failure to keep and/or lurnish required payroll records at S25 per
worker per day per violation equals S -._.—_
(55 Total number of violations. Total sum due 5'31 ,050.00
This Notice is given pursuant to the provisions of Section 1727 or the Labor Code. You are nereby
required to withhold any and all payments which are now or hereafter may become due 10 the Contractor
hdreinabove named to the extent of the total claim as heremabove shown.
Executed on IULY 29 . 19')2 at LOS ANGELES , California.
STATE LABOR COMMISSIONER
By
N. C, I..S . I .
~61NEv6-.-q fyv: nMtaq P�n/M1,AuuvtM
ASOR COMMISSIONER,STATE Of CALIFORNIA J—` -
ee��Frtment of Illdatlrial Relevant
Iv,Sron of Laenr SMaaaree Enfereelnent '
BURS OF FIELD ENFORCEMENT
107 1 09000MAY. Suitt 5439 d 1NOUSTq.
'Oki 11e0[t3. CA M19 1 ..•-'wili�•• W
;2131 e20.2200 I �,�,•�• •''••�•p
,
Broer:
I
LAS VMIGENES MWICIPAL WATER DIMICP '
ATIN: DAVID R. LIPPMAN sA�Ft. eater r
4232 LAS VIRGENFS ROAD °ttAL'r
CALABASAS, CA 91302-1094 )
l__ J
.,awG l73H.. ,a..e.•
JIILY 29, 1992 j ��6�7d-?1715 • •
NOTICE TO WITHHOLD
.•u,caie..0 r tee��,e•,v+ee+ ..-- __—._ .. ._�_-_ �.
RErIONAL FACILITY _%P.a.NS10N Ty, ,LlflXZ FORCE NAIi!
SOU'1•IIhtST BUILD1.1G CLUB, TNC.
l T.RTCON GC•NrRAL BUILDING CO.
Enclosed are 3 NOTICE OF WAGES OWED anti NOTICE OF PENAL./ ASSESSMENT Pertaining !0
the above-named project.
V v I ,)Ct,,d.2f—e1 to withhold and retain Lem any dayfnanls dua the gtpa,al contractor the total amount
df j a1y.- 9—_— 'whlCn 's ale turn of 311 wages and penal ties 'nt le.tad pursuant to the provisions Of
Labor Cade Section 1727 as evidenced by the atlacnea of Ct of^ragas ..wed and Notica(s) of Penalty
Assessment.
If gu face"*rintrca of a suit !Fled by the contractot to rocaver:he p:evmbrtg wages and/or :he Penalets
La for Coca St:d.0 u n 1731 roques Iron retain *ne above statee sum oenang the outcome of the suit. It
no SUC nOLCti of salt is received ithin the 9f1 day pperWd 3f:er CeSsat:oo acceptance. or completion or
the protect, all .ninnies Nonald shall a* remitted to (?,is orrice. If .,thin the ifoforhantloned oei rod, the
contractor consents 'n writing with the Nottce of Wages Owed anc:or Nri:ce of Penalty Assessment, the
amount withheld snail be ten111ted to this office.
I cec!are under penalty of pequey As follows: I am An Julhod.4ed refutsalltative acting for the State
Labor Commissioner. 7 execute this 0eeiaraCon On Cenalf of the -or:re-s whose names ate set !otfh on
the attaened notices. I nave read the foregoing Notice to Withhold and I have made an investigation
of the facts relating thereto, and based on all the facts +nOwn to me at this time and based on all of me
statements and information given io me at !hd time. i am informed and believe that (he foregoing
.aolice to Wtthnmd is true and correct, and th a: the facts have been found to support this Aobce.
Sincerely.
STATE LABOR COMMISSIONER
By
•w" •� Mill OOT,ea TONITMXOLO
LABOR COMMISSIONER. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Department of Industrial Reatons
DIVISION OF LABOR STANOAROS ENFORCEMENT 1
Bureau of Field Enforcement OF
EpL OF. 7h
107 South Broadway.Rns5101 5,. •'tuhi1K P �•
LOe Angeles,CA 90012
�a.13�a44 YfRf Q yt
a\
1
m
TO: _ s'SH At, O
r LAS VTRGENP.S MUNICIPAL WATER DIST,1 A'•;, f
ATTN: DAVID R . L'IPPMAN :f '
4232 LAS VIRGENES ROAD Cq LIFp RNLI
L CALABASAS . CA 91302-1994 J
DATE: JULY 29 , 1992 InpITWRe�e�s�� rnber.
NOTICE OF WAGES OWED
Contract Number
Sub•Cunnactor : r_�,
I -F66N-.C^NE{,1L, ' UI-1,44,1YC_C0 .
Ocneral Conuactor
SOUTHWEST BII'1LDTN ' CLUB INC. .
IRolect Name and Adress
RRG , PAC. "t%P. IV, SLUDGE FORCE MAZY _
Please take notice that the p wn(s) named on Zzhibit'A•.attached hereto and mace a part hereof, have performed
lalxx as stated on Exhibit"A"for the sub•conaaetor or generaul conaactur,named above,or other person($)
acting by your authority on the work of improvement in progress or being completed at your properry
at the project shown above.
Total vaaae of the labor so performed is the sum PS�J'—=3, •9- and no payments have been
made for Ume foregoing abor except as indicated on Exhibit 'A",and there now remains due,owing and unpaid
19_,SAC,detlucUng all Just credits and offsets. The labor wits performed for and
furnished to tht above named general eoneactoron thc above named project,
This Noubc is given pursuant to Uhe provisions of section 1727 of the Labor Coda. You sre hereby required
pursuant to said section to withhold any and all payments which are or hercofter may become due to the contractor
hcrvINbove Mrnad to the extent of the total claim as hertinabove shown.
JULY 29 92 LOS ANGELES
Exeemed on California
STATE LABOR COOMMMMIIISSIONER
By _s 011 JBR
M. UIIWENBEC , L.S . I .
NY n prHm NOTICE Or WAGES OWED
Z.
i j!'•'T_ 4 OWN
I+ '
�•.. I � h.; }4tl
t CABO�FOF°i�.Ii�S iFIFJ�RaSTATE OF�ALIFOPPIIA�i +'`�4u pt. 'r6''� tn ai' �.�a�''C. ���
e aN.Dfar Bgi{A;I a.htra�, -
� nDf�li�.BlirTdirds knfOK[ 'u, ;u+*�jy,Y �ra t'F'T.' yaYi� •. r � k �^ .• , t�r .a.
' e'T ' a r i1°fin N .le,4z5 rY ff haul a tF#Dusrp 5 t
jr
•wenorxo ao n � Y �
C y o � _ g 'a • eec � y ' ���}r. by i
$OSq$feaE,SAve „1 y orcALu
r t:eg na Beach"MCa 92651+
i ' PgAEMEi{RM, Wide row'n
.az�ta�ts
oAnn may', r w o,play.•. Ix snyl,Niraw,,�aurnuraav
. erc' h�'.,, tO"tC19924e: . )G c�'i4aY . .::sev. Re'F'J. �.t, .. 7�'W0572 79r ". :'"
}C94 f ` ', • °I r ry..tl.6 yid Sr{'
r,` J4;tiIF'}tiif'47r , 3I 2a' i, "1g$'s�y
si A`M DED { w 0 iCy:TO I H O 199 'ii{f
W. 1,, �,rfl 7n8dnhWRA'R> ii Nb!ikJ$(de r'9e 7!kf .V'�� ilvmM ��'
aoam.Axe IY....... xuw.aN. , « •ia:g rGt.�ry 1^'{' n - tl:r r :r.fj'
liauiie ° ieechaC�.�'' ��eppr�,�{{ x�i %Ad��� a ' 43i ° r » .`. } 't! 'n•i .
Ceri B�11 'Renove on , d onwt �v.-, AoGi a.. °•., .i:..�
rana.aoxTaAernN - iu Dre ,�1 �7,,f u �, li • 1 ( I [•
i #'Be e B ers f ;!r v,:Moi lldlc�Sj 5� f n a« 'Fd �"�t •s�L�yt
IVaK'ONTNACTONy •t��
} °• t ;gin ey .0 s c yi on "avt� r ` maw
y tR !n+;,aWET,!')a
" ' '�Y �q�OTICE.OF W GES b24
VJEOa ' IT CE OFr'Eg".Y ASSESr ambra ict9h ixR f { ..i}•
a+Yt} r 4#isyi/Qy;?d � _ 1 ,,T # °y 7t'T' AOr` t' sp t •'!Q('¢N r. 'n
,�a�" ^V4o ra• F c e o wl[nfflia�l1 and a am row� ap a manj d T genei1i n rac he toEa�
Y° -op$ which It the,' 0 5II Cade a d be altle3 forfe1t,d pursuant to theprowslons of
#� A
L'abor,CSBe SectiorTel 27/5rbJldencl•d'b�' e'3t1ahCdN(�iceofWages Owed andNotice#s) of Penalt211.1 VI j $ , ia'a .�u,� I` �, o , ee99 a r)o to o a . Ile y, a con rac or o IIecover a prevailing wages an/or �+en�s13M i oF1.CSdd'Sectibn 731s'regUffes`yI .tetilHIth4,abovaLstated;sUrnpendingtheoutcomeot,thetult, if
r Fa no }JEEM h cite, d 3terved, thlrh1ha 901fay"g lod a(teF C Issationpacceptance;of completion
jr obr a8 p81 BNI1 'CJ1�hIshhelds#hs ybee re I�tea.tb i offloe �f yvltnin the afore 6rltioned enotl+`(he + 7
pfrac @F tbh q jlr1lWFlflhg'WIW' h � of t"~a 61 Owed�e r 4 ke of e�altJ;AsseismehA•'(fie.,s t'.
W( amaJnt w hheld all be Femltt2dd t61216
Icf
elr 'pluln ervoi a 9' Xff , oll : 'ti i4 Jf. v 2• a fY 4r �N_,
} i deelare,under penal�y of Port�,•a3�fo��ows am, n•auf�ior zer presen Etivle attl r 4he Stllla�e": A
Labor.Commits 7 execute tt is Declaration n;behalf of the workers whose names are set forth on I
the attached notices ''.I„have read;the foregoing-No ice to Withhold and I have made an investigation
of the facts relating thereto and.based,on all the;tacts know to me at this time and based on all of the
-stattements and Information given to,mel yti,�h ls,time I arrt'p+Informed and bel lave that the foregoing
INotice to tWlthholdf If true an tl correOpend t a t e btts have been found to support this Notice
�t2�Li�Wr• t:r 4• I
" SinterBy F'� }'il*
STATE BOR COS I • !� cc,,.. ( ♦ �rJ+'
_. ..
ydie Fsilkerson "
a '. �iuy• a �` Ai<t'- �I r z�.1�a; ro,` -I�'�k�'�s �>R r � �_„•�___ iw_r_I�ryil NDTIC[ TO WITIiMOLD W n1
MAN,
0 t•
c F
z
y
9
9 4
�L y
, re . P J
CENTER FOR CONTRACT COMPLIANCE
October 15, 1992
Mr. Carrillo
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Ave
Box 8127
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
"Absolute Privilege"
RE: Water Treatment Plant Operation Center Bldg Expansion
@ Plant 2 (P22351)
CONTRACTOR: The Gorham Company Inc.
Dear Mr. Carrillo: fir'
The Center for Contract Compliance (CCC) is a non-profit
organization concerned with compliance of those laws that
govern public works including, but not limited to the
payment of the required prevailing wage. To achieve this
objective, the CCC works closely with awarding agencies
and the public agencies entrusted with the enforcement of
these laws.
One of the services the CCC offers to awarding agencies
are the results of our investigations. This information
may be useful to you in your contract decision making
process. We believe the public interest is best served
when public contracts are awarded to responsible and
responsive bidders. The lowest responsible/responsive
bidder best responds in quality, fitness and capacity to
the particular requirements of the proposed work.
It has come to our attention that The Gorham Company Inc. ,
is the second low bidder on the above mentioned project.
We would like to inform you of The Gorham Company's poor
performance record and history of public works violations.
On the Bear Gulch Elementary School project, The Gorham
Company was found to be in violation of Labor Code 1774,
non payment of prevailing wages and were fined a total of
$19,000.00. This project was also finished several months -
behind its scheduled completion time. For more
information concerning this project, please contact Ingrid
Vogel at 714-989-8541.
205 W. First Stn_t S-to 104 0 Tcsen. CA 92680 0(714i 730-962C 0 Fax(714)730-9647
1
v
In the City of Alhambra, Gorham was the Prime Contractor
for the restoration of Fire station #72. Gorham again was
found innvv olation of 1774 but wa av 1
wFian they reari2e3'"f� a CCC was on to_11iy� Tome a
Iona SeUry-b�IIsl 4' eh�arndm any was hr 1m o_rfffTue--Vo
excessive cnange order requests, p� oor workmanship awn —
running over the
hverae
ails,tm at cevecomlhc 818-570-5007 and speakcon a e City
with Mrs. Vangie Shock or contact the inspector, Jack
Carraher, at 818-570-5044.
The Gorham Company was the General Contractor on a City
Hall Renovation project for the City of Signal Hill. For
information regarding his performance, contact Mr. Ron
Williamson, Public Works, at 213-426-7333.
The City of Laguna Beach also has a project constructed by
The Gorham Company and it too has some problems. First of
all, three of the subcontractors on this project were
found in violation of Labor Code 1774. B & M Construction
was fined $6,435. 06, Ken Killinger Concrete was fined
$5,845.12 and Environments West was fined a total of
$2,663.00. The Gorham Company also violated sections
4106, 4107.5 and 4109 of the Public Contract Code by
ewit i 1 in subcontr without notifying or
POrOVal rom the 1 v. a City was a er
Orange County office for further action.
Also, after reviewing the subcontractor list submitted by
The Gorham Company, we discovered that they were in
violation of Public Contract Code 4100, et seq. The
Gorham Company failed to list at least six subcontractors
who will be performing work in excess of lhalf of 1
percent of the total contract price. Not listing these
subcontractors at the time of bid gives The Gorham Company
an unfair advantage over the other bidders because they do
not have to list the prices which subsequently makes the
Gorham Company's bid price much lower than the other
contractors. This violation alone should show that this
contractor is "Non Responsive" and they should be removed
as the "second low bidder".
It is at this time that the Center for Contract Compliance
requests that The Gorham Company be found "Non Responsive"
for their failure to comply with the Public Contract Code
and for their history of poor performance as a contractor.
C
I{
If you need any further assistance in this matter, please
feel free to call me at 714-730-9620.
Sincerely,
CENTER FOR CONTRACT COMPLIANCE
Alex Esparta
Field Investigator
AE/rp
Co. Mr. Jim Lintern, Director, CCC
Mr. Roger Miller, Regional Manager, DLSE
Legal Counsel
1A11- ��M�ISSIONER,STALE OF CALIFORNIA
DrRlnrarnlo Indudrhl Rdltlenl '
Division of Labe,Shndrdl Eelemarn.nl '
BUREAU OF FIELD ENFORClishNf INDUSl '
700 South Pack Avenua, Suit* 830-A 0 .,. ;;., , .A/q� \
Pomona, California 91766 , I
0714 .627-2267
.... ..... q l I
Central School District a't.
9457' Foothill BOU.19vard +re o, 0019
Rancho Cudamongai CA 91730
November 20, 1989 26-p(V_09/,no/�o1—�_•„—
NOTICE TO WITHHOLD
Bear Culeh•Elementary School (Phase III)
The Corham Co., Inc.
Enclosed are a NOTICE OF WAGES 01'7ED and NOTICE OF PENAL'Y ASSESSMENT pertaining to
Ilse above-named project.
You dire t q to withhold and retain from any payments due the tiqoneral contraclor the total amount
of S 2414-12.._..., which is fist sum of all wages and penalties for ailed pursuant to it,e provisions of
Labor Code Section 1727 as evidenced by file attached Notice of Wages Ov ed and Notice($) of penally
Assessment.
It you receive nolite of a suit tiled by the contractor to recover the peevaling wages and/or the Penalties
Labor Code Section 1731 requires you retain lice above staled sum panJing the outcome of the suit. It
AO such notice of suit is received within the 90 day filled after cassatinn acceptance. or completion of
the Proecl, all monies withheld shall be remitted to tMs office It with,, -Ae aforementioned period, tilt
conlracior Consents,in willing will, the Notice of Wages OWed and/or Fichte of Penalty Assessment, the
amount withhold 'shall be remitted to this office.
declare undo, penal) 01 periury as follows! I am an authorized sev,ese„Iblive acting for if,* State
abor Commissioner, Y execute this Declaration on behalf of the wo(k.rs whose names are set forll, on
the attached notices. I have read the Jereyoinq Notice to WllIhhofd and I have made an investigation
of the facts totaling thereto, and based on all Iho laels Known to me it this time and based on all of file
slalemenb and informallon;given to me at this time. I am informed and believe that the foregoing
Notice to and
N true and correct, and [flat the facts have been found to support Ihis Notice.
Sincerely,
STATE LABOR COMMISSIONER r
ubber ey
Cap, y La or Commie Sion er
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
V BI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
108,U ELL16 AVENUE
9o.Box Z
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.CALIFORNIA BR728-B127
(7141962R411
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
NOVEMBER 18, 1992 - 7:30 P.M.
D
p FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WEANING CAPITAL FNOCESSING DATE lu/ul/92 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CCU NTT
CLAIMS PAID 10/41192 POSTING DATE 1:/17/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
1250F4 AMERICAR TELEPHONE { TELEGRAPH 11.504.41 ' LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
125005 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC $50.09 LAB SERVICES
195006 ACTION RENTALS $1.844.25 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
125007 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC 647P.125.04
125008 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC t993.02 AIR
CONDITIONING
SUPPLIES
PI-35-2, J-21
125009 AIR PROOLCTS s CHEMICAL IN s16.815.ud AIR RI CRY
GEN SEB
OEM PUBLICATION
AGREEMENT ORY CEN 9YIR N.O.B-9-B9
D 125011 AMER SOCIETY LI CIVIL EM6R &21W.U4 PUBLICATION
123011 AMERICAM NI-I IFT t721.BB
T RENTAL EQUIPMENT
145012 AM WELL II CORPORATION /390.nY
2 MACHINE PARTS
p 125014 ANTHONYBLAKE P AN OERSONCONTR $97256.06 CELLULAR TELEPHONE RSIMpUR86M6NT
D 125014 AN PLUS
PEST CONTROL a250.61
125015 A PLUS SYSTEMS t561.69 P68R CONTROL eeRVIC88
NOTICES ERVICE A ADS
REE
m 12501E ABC LABORATORIES 41.300.06 SERVICE SERVICES
m 125018 AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY $7.529.52 ULABNIFORM
R RENT
3 18501E ABATER SERVICES
NSTRUM INC 3T.529.52 MISTER RENTALS
# IYS 019 AURORA INSTRUMENT t1J.661.5u METER
OO 145020 AURORA PU NP f1A.,.11 MPmP
ECHANICAL
125022 AUTO SHOP EOUISUPPL CO .167.05 MBCIUUIICAL RBPAIRB
125023 BC INDUSTRIAL SUP/LT INC $3,187.66 ROPE
D 125024 BRN SAFETY
t3.1BT.66 SAFETYRESIDUALSSUPPLIES
REMOVAL M.O.30-9-91
r 125025 BAY SAF ETV { SUPPLY $2,303.67 BATTER EUPPLIBB
F— 125026 BATTERY DIAGNOSTICS
53.350.34 LAB SRI88
p 12502E 0CA TEN O:AT ENTERPRISES
N TES INC $1.575.00 LAB WASHSUPPLIESTIC
125021 PCACON
BRD EN T[RPR IS GS INC. f1$181.82 CAR YABE EQUIPMENT
y 125029 YT BILL LARD OR $560.93 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
125029 DON
RAC7ATON SERVICE iSB0.9J TRUCK REPAIRS -
.� 125031 BON N-RUES S91.55 TRUCK RBPAIRe
t") 123032 BRERMER FIEDLERINSTRUMENT
6 ASSOC IN $1.297.32 CHLORINATION
PARTS
� 125033 BROOMS INSTRUMENT DIY. 53,191.78 CNLORIBIIRION BUPPLI88
fn 125034 BROWN { CALDWELL CONSULTING f53 d14.54 ERIUMIA RIND SSRVIC68 J-19
125035 BURKEER EN EMPORIUM $76.55 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
125036 BURN E' ENGINEERING CO t1.176.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
12503E BUSY AND REET) ![S INC S4.18B.0u SURVEYING SERVICES
EIMBUR M.O. 6-10-92
125436 GAR" 4 STREET) $1.021.93 PETTY GIN REIMBURSEMENT
125039 CN2M HILL 31$129.31 ELECTRIRINO SERVICES
125040 C M I $325.96 LAB
PASTE
125041 CRC PRESS INC $658.47 LAE SUPPLIES
1250E CS COMPAAT 9BSB.47 CHARDWARE
ONFERENCE
125043 1992 CYPCA SRTC l510.04 INSTRUMENT
REGISTRATION
125044 CAL SOUII EQUIPMENT CO i$29.69 IEGULATOR PARTS
125045 CALTROL INC t29.69 REGULATOR PARTS
125046 CALIF ASSOC OF BRb TOENEIE 1935.u4 REFUND
REGISTRATION
SPECS
12504E CALIFORNIA PORE FABRICATORS 433.15 GAYETY PLANE 6 SPECS PEES
125040 JOHN CAROLED
MACHINERY .376.51 GAYETY BUPPLIEB
12504E CENT CAR SAFE ENGINEERS /1$0.637.35 BNOIRBBSUPP SERVICES P1-36, PI-38
125049 CENTURY SAFETY INST { SUPP fB.637.J5 SAFETY SUPPLIES
ri
b
I
N FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST YCRBING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/ul/91 PAGE Y
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANCL CDO MTV
CLAIMS PAID lu/47/92 POSTING DATE 10/07192
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT UESCRIPTION
125050 CHEN TOO LABORATORY INC t36o.ou LAB SERVICES
125051 CHEVRON USA INC 1969.8E
125052 COAST APPLIANCE PARTS $88.42 ELECTRIC PARTS
SUPPLIES
125053 COASTAL CFLORINATION 1240.00
125054 COLE FARMER INSTRUMENT CO $512.13 CHLORINATION
TION PARTS
LAB SUPPLIES
PUBLICATION
125056 COMPREE PLACEMENT COUNCIL $220.OU PUBLICATION
b 12505E COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA 1268.14 MACHINE BUPPLI89
m 125058 COMPUTER INC. 3$1 a.DO COMPUTER 90FTMAR6/HAROMgRE
125D5B COMP USEgVL fl a.DO
Z COMPUTER 86RVICB9
Cy 125060 CONSOLE 4M PARTS LEC / DIV 6280.0E ELECTRIC
PARTS
b 125061 CONTINENTAL ELECTRICAL DIST 65.118.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
125062 CONTINENTAL CAIRHEMICAL
TOOLS INC $3.232.50 TOOLS
125063 CONTINENTAL CONSULTANTS
CO 6l.232.5V CHLORINE NG ERVICE
f71 125064 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C .557.19 ENGINEERING SERVICES
3 125065 COOPER IkDUSTWHOLESALES INC fJ$929.13 ELECTRIC
P PARTS
OD 125065 COUNTY WHOLESALE ELECTRIC $259.1] ELECTRIC PARTS
OD 12506E STA TC OF CALIFORNIA .141.55 ENGINEERING
FEE
SE -SERVICES
PI-38-
125067 DANES L MTIRE f8$124.32 TIREMEeRING SERVICES PI-18-3
I 12506E DANIELS LIRE SERVICE 5121.6E TIRES
b 125070 MSk/DUELER 5931.6E GAUGE
r 125071 DE GUELLE t SONS 6lAYS CO .944.85 CLASS
f- 125071 DELL COMPUTER E CORP f15$199.03 COMPUTER PARTS
125073 DEW PAR SALES t SERYI'CE f199.U3 BLBCTRIC PARTS
17 125014 DIALOG NFO/OR CS CO f1 d30.00 VALVES
N 115075 DIALOG ENVIROATIONNMENTAL
{CR01CC{ $35751.92 ANIONIC
POLYMER
125076 DIATEC CMYIRONMCNTAL t1$247.29 ANIONIC POLYMER M.O.8-12-92
.� 12507E DIGILIPPO UIEOCIATES 5297.29 PRINTING
f") MOTE DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP f399.0V SERVICE AGREEMENT
16507E DOpg00 LRTL RPRISL{ INC 429.00.YO PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 R6PAIP9
y 125079 DURO-SLMSE CORP $924.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS
125060 EPE TECHROLOGIES 6250.JU INSTRUMENT PARTS
125081 EASTMAN INC 67.977.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES
125082 ELECTRD,TF.ST INC $366.46 BLBCTRIC PARTS
125083 ENCHANTER INC $4,480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92
125084 FOR COPIER PRODUCTS 6164.0 OFFICE SUPPLIES
125085 PST SAND AND GRAVEL INC $236.12 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
125OB6 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE $5.98U.0O RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
125007 JOHN 8 FALKENSTEIN PE $3.400.04 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16
12508E FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 6178.Ou AIR FREIGHT
125009 FERRELLGAS t76.55 PROPANE
125090 FILTER SUPPLY CO 4 f953.43 PUMP PARTS
125091 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURA 5350.0U PUBLICATION
125092 FISCHER t PONTLR CO 52.176.69 CHLORINATION PARTS
125093 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO $948.65 LAB BUPPLI89
125094 FISONS INSTRUMENTS $219.82 LAB SUPPLIES
125095 FLO-SYSTEMS 61,394.81 PUMP PARTS
b
D
I
W
FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST YO PM ING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/4l/92 PAGE 3 -
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COON 7Y
CLAIMS PAID 11/67/92 POSTING DATE 1,101/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
125096 FLOOPAMICS INC $180.52 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
125097 FORMA SCIENTIFIC. INC. $3.496.86 INSTRUMENT
125098 CLIFFORD A FORKCRT $21.307.03 SURVEYING SERVICES H.O.6-30-92
I25099 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMARA slal.ee FILM
125100 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY S31bUb.54 WATER USE
D 125101 FOUNTAIN VALLEY FAINT $234.64 PAINT SUPPLIES
1251L2 FOX ENTERPRISES 33.650.Uu SAFETY CONSULTANT
m 125103 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES 578.54 FITTINGS
m 125104 THE FOXBORO CO 9872.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
l7 1251CS DST. INC. s706.u4 OFFICE SUPPLIES
D 125106 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO $3.951.69 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL
12510 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. 51.973.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
--1 125106 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $3.650.37 TELEPHONE SERVICES
m 125104 6ILRLICh-MITCHELL INC 93.659.84 MECHANICAL PARTS
125110 GRAHAM L JAMES $843.25 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.B-14-91
4k 125111 YY GRAINGER INC 6333.14 ELECTRIC PARTS
00 125112 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $2,292.32 PHOTO SUPPLIES
125113 DUN GREEK L ASSOCIATES s16.472.au SURVEY SERVICES M.O.6-20-92
125114 HACM COWFANY 51.696.0 LAB SUPPLIES
D 125115 MATCH L KIRK INC $719.37 INSTRUMENT PARTS
T— 125116 PL HAYN CO INC $136.69 FILTER
C— 125117 HELPMATES TEMPORARY SERVICES 51.377.2a TEMPORARY SERVICES
ty 125118 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC $1,416.23 COMPRESSOR PARTS
125119 J.T. HORVATH L ASSOC. 33.a00.O0 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 3-23-1, J-17
!n 125120 PS HUGHES CO INC $1.376.82 PAINT SUPPLIES
125121 HUNTER CORPORATION $108.260.7a CONSTRUCTION J-19-1
225122 HUNTIN610K BEACH RUBBER SIX 9352.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES
n 125123 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C $150.74 BICYCLE PARTS
125124 IBM COPP/PC BOOKS 6 SPECIA 1,587.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Cn 125125 IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL $25.78J.51 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-14-90
125126 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $896.25 CONNECTORS
125127 INFOTRIEVE 625.5a PUBLICATION
125128 INGRAM PAPER $191.19 PAPER
125129 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $135.47 TRUCE PARTS
125130 INTEGRATED BUSINESS INT9 INC 554.547.46 OFFICE FURNITURE N.O.4-8-92
125131 J G GLASS CORPORATION $1.361.53 REFUND PLAN CHECK BALANCE
125132 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP S1.b35.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
125133 JAYS CATERING $275.91 DIRECTORS' MEETING EKPRNSES
125134 JCNSEN INSTRUMENTS CO $1.029.26 GAUGE
125135 JM JOHNSOR GENERAL CONTR 51.950.06 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-17
125136 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY s139.13 ELECTRIC PARTS
125137 JONES CHEMICALS INC 35.968.07 CHEMICALS
125136 JONES INDUSTRIAL HANDWARL C 3605.54 HARDWARE
125139 KALLEENOS COMPUTER PRODUCTS $119.66 PUBLICATION
125140 KEENAN L ASSOCIATES 52.475.u4 SAFETY SUPPLIES
125141 KELLY SEFVICES s89.16 TEMPORARY SERVICES
D
n
r
o FUND NO 9199 - JT GIST WORNINU CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE la/v1192 PAGE 9
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 11A7192 POSTING DATE IU/U7/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
125142 KING BEARING INC S1.54e.0 MACHINE SUPPLIES
125153 KNOA INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 69.J15.29 PIPING
125144 MARTIN KOROICK SR 53.194.BU CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
125145 LA LIOUIG MANGLING SYSTEMS 5102.E PUMP PARTS
125146 LAB SAFETY SUFPLY CO S98.38 LAB SUPPLIES
125147 LANTRONIR 5161.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1251AC LEGI -TECH 5275.0b COMPUTER SERVICES
m 125349 LIESERT CORPORATION S4'.80.53 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
ME 225150 KP LINDSTROM INC 51.205.0 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL
n 125151 ARTHUR D LITTLE, INC 554.18 PUBLICATION
125152 LOCAL AGENCY 14.V00.Ob LAFCO PROCESSING FEE
125153 SOTS LVNCh CORP S128.58 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
m125154 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $933.33 OCEAN MONITORING
3 125155 MDT BIOLCGIC COMPANY $245.76 SERVICE AGREEMENT
125156 MPS $338.6. PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
3B 125157 MACOMCO 5133.78 SERVICE AGREEMENT
CO 125158 MA6NETEK NATIONAL ELECTRIC 31.325.23 PUMP PARTS
i 125159 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 531.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
125160 MATT CHLOR INC S2.UOB.l. CHLORINATION PARTS
125161 MCKINLEY EQUIFMENT CORP 176.37 TRUCK PARTS
F— 125162 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO $50.99 INSTRUMRNT SUPPLIES
r 125163 MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER 511.661.JU WATER CONSERVATION PROJECT
ty 125164 MICROAGE OF CERRITOS 9108.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE
125165 MIDWAY MFG A MACHINING 514.674.13 IMPELLER
125166 MILLTRONICS S3.U69.78 INSTRUMENT PARTS
125167 MISCO $46/.56 TAPES
125168 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO $107.WU ELECTRIC PARTS
(� 125169 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO 3630.UO PUBLICATION
125170 JAMES M MONT60MERY 911.421.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES
N 125171 MONTGOMERY LABORAIURILS 11.b05.J0 LAB SERVICES
125172 MOTION IRDUSTRIES INC 112.35 MECHANICAL PARTS
125173 MULLEN L ASSOC INC 33,297.54 ENGINEERING SERVICES
125174 BASCO WEST INC $249.21 LAB SUPPLIES
125175 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTAL
125176 NCWARN ELECTRONICS $598.57 ELECTRIC PARTS
125177 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $5.94 WATER USE
125178 NORTHWESTERN CARBON $4.278.88 CHEMICALS
125179 NUTECH CORPORATION $21,694.63 1." EQUIPMENT
125100 OFFICE ELECTRONICS. INC. 5217.29 PAPER
125182 01 CORPORATION 186.25 LAB SUPPLIES
125182 OFFICE PFVILION/INTERIOR RES 299.35 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS
125283 CA SYSTEPS CO 538.183.U6 CHLORINE M.O.10-9-91
125184 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO PARTS C $82.b7 TRUCK PARTS
125185 ORANGE COURIER SIIA.JU COURIER SERVICES
125IB6 ORANGE VALVE 6 FITTING CO. 51.335.67 FITTINGS -
125187 ORION RESEARCH $291.0. INSTRUMENT
r
U: FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/01192 FADE 5
REPORT NUMBER AF63
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COU U TV
CLAIMS PAID 1L107/92 POSTING DATE l0107/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OESCRIPTION
12518E OXYGEN SERVICE $5.417.77 SPECIALTY GASES
125309 COUNTY OF ORANGE 569.176.00 USSR FEE DATA H.O.11-11-91
125190 CSOOC SELF FUNDED MEDICAL 1 3100.000.00 MEDICAL PREMIUM ADVANCE
125191 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $2.103.14 SAFETY SUPPLIES
125192 PACIFIC BELL 6226.86 TELEPHONE SERVICES
125193 PACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS f6.89b.J0 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
a 125194 PAK WEST S2.106.5. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
m 125195 PALMIERI. TYLER, WIENER. 51.536.40 LEGAL SERVICES 19-1-1A
m 125196 PARAGON CABLE 534.95 CABLE SERVICES
Z
C 125197 PARAMOUNT TANK INC $434.37 TANK TESTING
a 12519E PICKWI ELM ER CORPORATION 31.927.95 LAB 9UPPLIEB
125200 PIMAYISR PAPER S113.51 PACKING MATERIALS
m 125201 PIMA SRO SYSTEMS INC f217.592.23 RESIDUALS REMOVAL N.0.5-8-91
m 125202 PITIES SOOES 3333.87 POSTAGE R MACHINE LEADS
3 125293 PLAINS TRUESALOE HARDWARE 331.C7 RENTAL
� 125203 POLYMETEIG E. INC. .252.33 CANTON EQUIPMENT
W 12520S POSITIVE INC $22$241.70 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.1-11-92
125206 HAROLD POSITIVE FORMULATORS, INC. 1252.60 CHEMICALS
1 12520E NRROLD PRIMROSE ICE a225.60 ICE
a 125206 TRUF PROJECT SOLUTREETIONS
CARE $2.225.00 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
P
r 12520E THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS G0. 49 S150.90 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
r 125209 p t S AUTOMATION CROW a150.93 ELECTRIC PARTS
125211 CAVALCADE ELECTRIC
ESCROW TORS f999292.50 ELECTRIC
M ORNAGBMENT SYSTEM M.0.8-12-92
Nl7 125212 RPM ELECTRIC M. f9.377.13 INSTRUME MOTOR REPAIRS
125213 RACO MFG. t HOES COCU 576.60 INSTRUMENT PARTS
.� 125213 RED WING EXP SHOES $576.6E COURIER
CAS BHO88
� 125215 RCDI EXPRESS 005.11 COURIER SERVICES
125216 MCJUNKIN-REPUSLICBLIC SUPPLY 1L002.88 HARDWARE
12521E REMOLD INC. f112.89 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
N 125210 ROMAN ENGINEERING CO /11284.36 ELECTRIC PART
12521E JOSENIUM PRODUCTS Co $755.37 ELECTRIC BUPPLI88
125220 GAIETY
T NYECORP f SON IN $173.31 STEEL
TS
125221 SAFELY KLEIN COUP $521.73 PARTS CLEANER
125222 SANDERS ENGINEERING 3521.73 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
125223 SANCON ENGINEERING INC i1R$980.00 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
888VIC88
125223 SANTA PC INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 3985.69 PLUMBING 9UPPLIEB
125229 DEUG SARYI$ 5675.0 FIRST AID/CPR TRAINING
12522 SETYVES f1.124.0u LAB RIRVICEB
125226 SECURITY SPECIALISTS $313.01 SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
125228 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 3662.52 TOOLS HARDWARE
12522E SIGMILD CN SALES i$78.11 TOOLS
125230 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO •70.11 LAB 9UPPLIEB
125231 SKALCR. INC f$1.311.50 LRB 9UPPLIEB
125232 SKIPRBK YRLX-IN MEDICAL CLI 31.311.50 - PRE-EMPLOYMENT H PHYSICAL EXAMS
125233 SOUTHEEMERY CO f981.09 802E TESTING M.O.7-17-91
125231 SOUTHERN CALIF CDI SON CO fl.:B 9.99 POWER
a
ri
m FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST WCRXINb CAPITAL PROCESSING GATE !4/el/92 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTT
CLAIMS PAID 10/07/92 POSTING DATE 10147/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
125234 SO CAL GAS CO $5.640.35 NATURAL GAB
125235 SOUThLRN COUNTIES OIL CO $26.948.46 DIESEL/UNLEADSO FUEL
125236 SOUVENIR FHOTO 4103.3b PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
125237 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC 5624.08 VALVE PARTS
125238 SPEX INOLSTRIES INC $517.18 LAB SUPPLIES
12-239 - SPRINGER-VERLAG 3109.1b PUBLICATIONS
a 128240 SRCCO PLEAIBLE 173.46 TRUCK PARTS
125241 STARNA CELLS. INC. $414.77 LAB SUPPLIES
m 125242 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS 1780.6. LAB EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION
O 125243 STERLING ART 9175.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES
n 125244 SUMMIT STEEL $1,308.57 STEEL
125245 SUPELCO INC $152.72 LAB SUPPLIES
125246 70 SCIENTIFIC GLASS $94.49 LAB SUPPLIES
125247 TIF INSTRUMENTS INC $71.75 ELECTRIC PARTS
m 125248 TEKDRAULICS $1.871.25 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
125249 TELFCELL, INC 564.26 OPERATING SUPPLIES
4h 125250 CHARLES E THOMAS $356.22 TRUCK PARTS
00 125251 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 1571.69 HARDWARE
125252 TONY•S LOCK 1 SAFE SERVICE 573.47 LOCK RE-KEYING
125253 TOYO LANDSCAPING CO 54.172.37 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING W.O.11-13-91
y 125254 VESTRONICS $1,154.22 INSTRUMENT PARTS
T— 125255 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY JUL $667.14 TRUCK PARTS
r 125256 JG TUCKER L SON INC 43,987.86 INSTRUMENT PARTS
ey 125257 TWINING LABORATORIES OF $5.665.56 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91
12525E UNITED CONCRETE COMPANIES 5561.U5 CONCRETE
CN 125259 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $345.64 PARCEL SERVICES
125260 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP 6250.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
A 125261 'MARK D SOOSEY $14.696.75 WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE H.0.3-I1-92
I7 125262 YVR SCIENTIFIC $2,700.74 LAB SUPPLIES
—i 125263 VALIN CORPORATION - 5711.59 REGULATOR PARTS
Ln 125264 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO S1..J3.25 PLUMBING SUPPLIED
125265 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS 52.695.50 LAB SUPPLIES
125266 VERNE'S PLUMBING $110.00 PLUMBING SERVICES
125267 VILLAGE NURSERIES $294.67 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
125268 VEATHER AKD VINO INSTRUMENT $290.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES
125269 VEST COAST INSTRUMENTS 5173.1V INSTRUMENT PARTS
125270 WESCL $217.61 ELECTRIC PARTS
125271 VHESSOE VAREC 98.352.78 VALVE
125272 WHITNEY PACHINERY INC S15.a87.77 TRUCK PARTS
125273 U17EG SCIENTIFIC $905.10 LAB SUPPLIES
125274 WORDPERFECT CORP - $156.06 SUBSCRIPTION
125275 XEROX CUPP 41.594.7. COPIER LEASES
125276 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $155.5. VALVE
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/07/92 S2.03.808.O8
b
I
V
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/01/92 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10/07/92 POSTING DATE 10/07/92
SUMMARY AMOUNT
#1 OPER FUND $4,723.35
01 CAP FAC FUND $680.00
b p2 OPEN FUND $10,829.38
m 02 CAP FAC FUND 09,443.79
'm p3 OPEN FUND - 939,355.06
az p5 OPEN FUND $21,385.32
p5 CAP FAC FUND $7,078.73
46 OPEN FUND $3,324.32
p7 OPEN FUND $0,363.76
m 07 CAP FAC FUND $1,188.00
3 #11 OPEN FWD $5,201.71
p11 CAP FAC FUND - $3,297.30
Y13 OPER FUND $879.20
00 014 OPEN FUND $4,250.00
I #14 CAP FAC FUND $4,716.49 ,
p667 OPEN FUND $3,316.51
a p7614 OPER FUND 5115.47
r JT OPEN FUND $509,266.57
r- CORP $1,197,121.28
d SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $103,320.25
JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND 4127,164.09
--------------
62,073,80E 78
..............
N
ri
tI
FUND NO 9159 - JT DIST 6EAKIN4 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1./14/92 PAGE 1
REPORT
LUUNIT SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNII NUMtlEX AFa!
CLAIMS PAID 1./21192 POSTING DATE 16121/92
WARRANT NO. VLNDUR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
1253:1 AG TLLH COMPANY 31L9.035..1 'RESIDUALS REMOVAL H.O.30-9-91
1253L2 ACTION RENTALS $385.54 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
1253.3 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES 39T3.71 LAB SUPPLIES
1253.4 AIR Fh CbLCTS 6 CHEMICAL IN 60V.315.UU 06M AGREEMENT 0X9 OBN SYBT M.0.8-9-59
125J(S ALUPICM CHEMICAL CO stl 3.65 LAB SUPPLIES
1253(6 ALHNheRA FOUNUNY CO LTD 64.N57..9 MAIUOLE COVERS
y 1253J7 ALLIED SUPPLY CO $3,112.16 VALVE
Cil 1253)6 AMERICAN FISMENIL5 SUCILIT 632.vu PUBLICATION
Z 1253,9 ROSCO INC a/OR AMERICAN SEALS $5.811.91 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
125310 AMERICAN TYPE CULTURE COLLLCTN 39J.6u PUBLICATION
y 125311 AMLRICAH WATER WORKS ASSOC. 31.722.44 LAB SUPPLIES
125312 BLARE P ANDERSON 697.5b REIMBURSEMBNT - CELLULAR TELEPHONE
125313 ANIATEN - DISTRIBUTION 3934.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES
FY1 125319 ANTHONY-5 HCCh a HAChINL. INC. 6766.41 MACHINE RBPAIRB/PARTS
3 125315 ABC LABORATORILS 61.732.50 SERVICE AGRBBMENT
•125316 AWDA7IL TLSIINU LABORATORY S10UO.04 LAB SERVIC88
125317 ARMUR VAC SWLLFING SEPVICL 1724.4J STREET SWEEPING SERVICES
00 12531E ASSUCIAIEL SOILS kNbIbELNIN6 39.313.5. SOIL TBSTING
125319 BNR LANDFILL •3.021.32 ,RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
125326 bRW SAFETY E SIMPLY 61.18O.b9 SAFETY SUPPLIES
3a 125321 BANANA WLULPRINT 32.976.65 ELUSPRINTINO SERVIC68
r 125322 BANCLAIS LAW PU6LIShEAS 1211.0 SUBSCRIPTION
r 125323 PAITERY SPECIALTIES 1636.1. RATTERIBS
t7 125324 6AXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC $8,865..b LAB SUPPLIES
N 125325 WT UILLAPU INC $522.49 MECHANICAL RBPAIRB
125326 bOLSA RADIATOR SLNVICE a624.96 RADIATOR REPAIRS
125327 hON A-RUES 3222.33 TRUCK PARTS
125328 TMi BOND NUVLM 164.99 PUBLICATION
125329 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC $1.406.39 MOTOR
125330 STLVE BLUALO CONSTRUCTION LU l82..8 W.4r CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3. 2-28, 2-29
125331 UUUGET JANITORIAL Sllb50.00 JANITORIAL SERVICBS
125332 RUILOLP•S EMPORIUM Sk J.75 HARDWARE
125333 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFF $2.010.62 PUBLICATION
12533E GARY 6 STRLED 16I11b.71 PSTTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
125335 hUTLLN PAPER Cb RPANV 31.189.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES
12533b CLFA 37S.UO LAB SUPPLIES
125337 CH2M PILL 19.372.28 BROINBBRINO SERVICES
125338 CAL bLA55 FOR RLSLARCH INC. 3349.97 LAB SUPPLIES
125339 CALIXOL INC 11.467.53 INSTRUMENT PARTS
125340 CAL hLST EhTLRFMISLS 61b.479.73 BOUND ABSORPTION PANELS PI-34-2
125341 CAPITOL LNDUINY. INC. 327.2E OFPICB SUPPLIES
12b342 CENTURY SAFETT INSI a SUFF 11.932.2h SAFETY SUPPLIES
12b343 uICN CLPLN VIC 3611.99 TRUCK PARTS
125344 CHLMICAL LX4I1,ELNINb 353.9r PUBLICATION
I25345 CHLVNON USA INC $5.048.7. OIL 6 INTENDS
125346 CINCULITIN6 AIR 312U.Uu AIR CONDITIONER PARTS
rA
1
N FUND NO 9199 JT OIS1 VCKKIN6 CAPITAL PNOCLSSINO LATE Au/l V/92 PAGE 2
R LPJRT NUMBLR AP46
CJUNIT SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COON TT
CLAIMS PAID lu12L/92 POSTING DAIS 16,21/9,
SARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
125347 CLAMK CGKSULTAOTS 61.b80.uJ CONSULTING SERVICES
125346 COASTAL CHLORINATION s2.88U..: WATER SYSTEM CHLORINATION SERVICES
12b389 THE CJ89 GROUP a89.... PUBLICATION
12535b CULICh AND SGNS $747.3.7... CONSTRUCTION I-9
125351 COMPRLSSbR COMPONENTS OF CA ab.6A1.39 PUMP PARTS
125352 COMPUSA, l..C. sA.kas.3b COMPUTER SERVICES
y 125353 CONFUSLI,VE a1V d2 COMPUTER SERVICES
m 125354 CONANU*S PHOTUGRAPHT S1b9.38 PHOTO SERVICES
m 125355 CONNELL OR PARTS / DIV $139.52 TRUCK PARTS
Z 125356 COASOLIUATLD ELECTRICAL LIST 61..172.45 ELECTRICAL PARTS
y 125357 CONSGLIDATEG .LASTICS EU 582.6J LAB SUPPLIES
12535E CGNIIAEHT.L AIR IUCLS 1,.0 +d.146.dJ TOOLS
125359 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 63.232.5i CHLORINE H.0.9-9-91
m 12536G CONTINLb ML GFAPhICS S1u5.38 BLUBPRINTING
g 125361 CONTNACIUN•S BOOK STONE al.447.6. PUBLICATION
125362 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS U L 6+3.123.25 ENGINEERING SERVICES 1-9
125363 COOPLB IADUSTAIES INC aT.b92.17 COMPUTER PARTS
m 125364 COSTA MESA AUTO SUFPLY +998.93 TRUCK PARTS
. 125365 CJUNIV YHOLLSALE ELECTRIC 69..5 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
125366 CYNLCLA s2.2b Y.0Y SERVICE AGREEMENT
n 125367 CAL IDLY MELLOGG UNIT a5.uuu.JJ LAB SERVICES
F— 12536E STATE OF CALIFORNIA a9.231..0 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
T— 125369 SIATL OF CALIFORNIA S23U.43 DIESEL USE TAR
ly 125370 STATE b4ARU Of LQUILIZATION 1473.33 UNDERGROUND PUEL STORAGE TAX
125371 OE ANEA CORFORATIUN s15u.Ju RENTAL EQUIPMENT
� 125372 HSK/OECKEN $212.11 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
A
125373 OIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 11.714.52 CHEMICALS
125375 DUNN WAIERPR ISES INC > 556G.Ub PLANT NAINTBES 8 REPAIRS
--A 125375 DUNN tUYARO6 SAFETY
a560.97 PAINT SUPPLIES
ti 12537E LU FGNT CO SAi CIY SERVICES aL l53.S9 LAB SUPPLIER
125370 LIE M INSTFLM CNTS V f96.31 IREIGHT T SUPPLIES
125379 EAM CG/Nb5 SU FP LT a9.31 FREIGHT
125380 EA6TMAR INC 62.966.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES
125380 EALHRK/tR INC a5.u9G..Y OCEAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92
125382 FALCON a2.l8...0 REmcosl
SIDUAL
125383 FALCON DISPOSAL SEPVIEt i5.98u../ MINSTRUCT REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
1-
125383 FASTENING
U 1'SOLUTIONS PE a3$212.67 CONSTRUCTION eBRVICee I-9. 1-16
125365 FCOLRAING SOLUTIONS INC a212... OFFICE FREIGHT
SUPPLIES
125385 FEDERAL EXPRESS CU xI $79b sV AIR ANEIGXT
12538E FILTLHLINE 525.89 PROPANE
125388 FILTEMLINE CORP s52U.N9 CHLORINATION PARTS
125389 FILTER 3Af PLY GU a969.61 PUMP PARTS
125399 FISHER A SFOkILRCIENTIFIC
EO a6..59.6u CHLORINATION PARTS
125391 FISHER SCILNIIFI[ co $5.259.49 LAB SUPPLIES
125391 FLU SYSTEMS V a5.259.A9 PIMP PARTS
' 125392 FDD11 TAli. VALLEY [ANLNp a82.11+ PILM
C!J
I
N
IN FUND NO 9194 JT U1ST 6CMb ING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 16/1R/92 PAGL 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CUUNIT SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS kAID 16/21/92 POSTING DATE 16021/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
125393 FOUNIA14 VALLEY TAINT $209.14 PAINT SUPPLIES
125394 1OA INb UbIRIAL SALES $317.47 FITTINGS
125395 lhC FJABLRU CU 62P632.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
125396 CITY OF FULLLRTDk SI%I.93 WATER USE
125397 GA1I.AFL LUMNER CO s2.W51.97 BUILDING MATERIALS
12539E GANNAIT CALLAIIAN CUMFANY 63.33J.56 OPERATING SUPPLIES
125395 GENEk AL BIN01NG CUNF 617b.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES
Y 1254G0 6iNLRAL cLECTRIC SUFFLV CO. 6196.92 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
n' 1254:1 GENERAL ILLLPhONE CU $4.771.19 TELEPHONE SERVICES
rn 125902 GEORGE LEECH A ASSOCIATES 6223.72 DRUIDS
C 125A0 GIERLICh•NITCMELL INC 517.252.64 MECHANICAL PARTS
n 1254(4 DON GREEN A ASSOCIATES 113,191... SURVEYING SERVICES H.O.6-10-92
1254:b GERALU L GREER CO INC 9231.66 TRUCK PARTS
12L4G6 hSW TECnNGLJGY 6771.761.7. CONSTRUCTION P2-49
FEI t25967 PATCH A KIRK INC f2t4.06 ENGINE PARTS
3 12546B HOERbIGLR CVS CALIF INC 9423.63 COMPUTER PARTS
12b90 HORIZON NIGH REACH A EWUIP s101.85 TRUCK PARTS
OO 125416 J.T. HORVATH 6 ASSOC. s3.a00.uu CONSTRUCTION SBRVICSS J-23-1, J-17
125411 RS hUGhLS CU INC 1%9.68 HARDWARE
I 12b912 CITY OF HUNTINGTON bCACh 121.7b WATER USE
D 125413 HUNTINGTON HONbA 61••91.V2 LAS SUPPLIES
r 12b911 hYCLONE LABORATORIES INC $3.318.76 LAR SUPPLIES
f— 125415 IRD MEChANALVSIS 63.W23.30 TOOLS
l7 125416 IMPERIAL VEST CHEMICAL 659.59b.ua FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-14-90
125417 INDUSTRIAL. TM.LADEO PRODUCTS $173.75 CONNECTORS
N 125418 INDUSTRIAL LAS/L S39.Uu SUBSCRIPTION
---1 125619 INFORTLAl SYSTEMS. INC. fl H9u.Vu SERVICE AGREEMENT
125920 INSIDE L.P.A. A765.4u LAS SUPPLIES
f") 125921 INIERMLC 13.936.51 LAB SUPPLIES
125422 INIEkSTAIL bnTILRV SVSILMS 1726.66 BATTERIES
Cl 125423 IRVINE OCSk10P GRAPHICS 4118.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
123924 IRVINE RANCH .ATER UISTk ICT 592.7b WATER USE
125425 JLA CREDIT CCRP $145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE
125426 GAEA1 WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 32.J21.87 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
125427 JM JOHNSON GENERAL CONTN 32.500.GU DOOR RELOCATIONS
12542B JGHNSIW.E SUFPLV f1.261.2b ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
125429 JGNLS CHEMICALS IWC 62.031.53 CHSMICIILS
125430 JONES INCUSIAIAL HARDWARE C 6166.G1 HARDWARE
125431 RAN PRODUCTS 4992.17 TOOLS
125432 RLLLV SERVICES $312.38 TEMPORARY SERVICES
125433 KING WLAAING INC 5290.5b MACHINE SUPPLIES
12543/ KNGA ITULbIRIAL SU6ILILS s795.79 LAB SUPPLIES
125435 MAPIl1, NChUICk SH f1.97U.BU CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
125436 LA CELLULAR 1LLLFHUNE CU 6136.49 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
125437 LIMITDROUE CORP 62.898.9e ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
12543E LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INS. CU. /\` $1.6.82 DEFERRED COMP TRANSFER
F
S FUND NO 9199 JI LIST >LSK IN4 CAI IIPL PROCLSSINb DATE 10/14/92 VA4[ 4
RLFORT SUNKEN APi3
COUNTY CLAI SANITATION UISIR ICOS Of ORANGE 6121/9
CLAIMS FAIO 14/21/92 POSTING DATE 14/21/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OLSCNLPllON
125439 RP LINLSIRUM INC 63.42A.0, CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL
121444 RCL LANORATORIIO $4.965.04 LAB SERVICES.
125441 MDT BIOLOGIC COMPANY 4243.2b LAB SUPPLIES
125442 MPS 561.2. PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
12b443 MACOMCO 452W.bb SERVICE AGREEMENT
12b444 MAO SYSILKS 513..31 INSTRUMENT PARTS
n 12b445 MAINTLGANCE PRODUCTS INC S3.966.2b MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
m' 12544b MAMIIIL 4 VAL.L SUFPLY S2..1...3 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
Z 125447 MANVAC ELECTRONICS 1111.3b INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
CO 12544b MNTf ChLOR INC 62.ebb.v4 CHLORIRRTION PARTS
n 12N49 MECHANICAL CHIVES CO 4497.17 INSTRUMENT
125450 MICRO MUIION 33.414.18 INSTRUMENT
12bib1 MICRGAGL OF CERRITOS $3.6Yb.17 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
3 125452 MIO.AY MFG 4 MACMININO 51.465..0 NECRANICAL PARTS
12b453 MILLTRUNICS 52.204.41 INSTRUMENT PARTS
4k 125454 MINNES.IA WLSTEAh VISUAL THIS. $144.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES
00 125455 ALAULN DLKTICM CONSTRUCTION 65u2.bUb.9. CONSTRUCTION 2-30
12b45b NON160MLRV LAbORAIURILS >S15.Vi LAB SERVICES
12S457 MOTION IAGUSTPIES INC Y1b3.34 HARDWARE
a 12b456 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 569.JS SAFETY FILM RENTALS
r 125459 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS $116.53 PRINTING
r 12b460 NEWARK LLECTRbb1CS 51bb.45 ELECTRIC PARTS
d 12L461 NORES IRICUCTS 61.006.15 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1254621 OM SVSICMS C. Fit.A70.91 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91
Cn 125463 OPERATION TCENNOLOGT INC S1.185.25 SERVICE AGREEMENT
--i 125464 ORANGE COUNTY AUTO IAFTS C 5154.16 TRUCK PARTS
125465 ORANGE COUNTY LhCMICAL LO 4743.74 CHEMICALS
c") 125466 ORANGE VALVE 4 FITTING CO. 419.743.18 FITTINGS
12546T OSCAR'S LOCK A SAFE 523U.64 SECURITY SUPPLIES
Cn 12'-466 UAYLEN SERVICI $1.415.33 SPECIALTY GASES
125469 COUNTY SANITATION 015THICT 343.240.21 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
125470 FACCO.SALES 60l.82 PAINT SUPPLIES
125471 PACIFIC FARTS 52.632.66 INSTRUMENT PARTS
125472 PACIFIC SAFLIV LGUIPMLNI CO 42.622.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES
12-473 PACIFIC ECLL 115..E TELEPHONE SBRVICSS
125474 FALTLL MERIDIAN SVSIEMS S97..b9 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
125475 FAGCRLI Y1b2..L PAGER RENTALS
12E47b FARAGDN CABLE $66.78 CABLE SERVICES
125477 FLAT MAR2ICK MAIN 4 CO 516.060.Uu AUDITING SERVICES M.0.3-13-91
12547P FEF.AMGN IhE55 PIC FRI.u. PUBLICATION
125479 FICKVICK FAFEW 5346.1. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
12548E PIMA 696 SVSIEKS INL S115.121.S6 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91
1254MI PITHi.Y bC>ES 526b.:b POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE
125462 SCOTT FOLK 52.144.0 DEFERRED COMP WITHDRAWAL
125483 FULYMLTRICS. INL, S32b..: EQUIPMENT RENTAL
125484 POLYFUNL INC S13.IUb.3. CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.]-11-92
Ib
E11 FUND NO 9159 JT UIST LCFM INI CPF IIAL PROCESSING DAZE /0/14/92 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CbUhT. SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAN6L COUNIV
CLAIM$ PAID 1U/21/92 POSTING DATE 1Y/21/92
WARRANT HU. VERDUN AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
125485 F06EN ELECTED SUFPLV EU S97.2u ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
12548E PHECISICN JNLULTRILS Abu.Yu ELECTRIC PARTS
1254E7 HAROLD PRIMROSE 1CL S/96... ICE
12548E PRLFLSSICKAL SERVICE IND. SL99.uU SOIL TESTING
125489 THE PR UJECT SOLUTIONS CO. S4.966..0 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECIIOM M.0.7-17-91
125490 UUESTRON CONY S1.2G4..0 LAB SUPPLIES
n 125491 STEVE P. RADOS• INC. sabl.Gle.l. CONSTRUCTION 14-1-IA-2
125452 RAINbbk LISPOSAL CO S1.429.49 TRASH REMOVAL
T77 12b493 RAININ INSTRUMENT CU $2.942.13 LAB SUPPLIES
Z 125494 NECK INC $145.996.11 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91
C 125495 THE REb1S7LR $3.198.3. NOTICES 6 ADS
D 125496 REMOTE MUCH NLSLTTING SYS7 aO•JUU.GU POSTAGE
125497 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY aS.b6U.b. PLUMBING SUPPLIES
m12549E RONAN ENGINEERING CO S1.6s..61 ELECTRIC PARTS
3 125499 THOMAS L. ROOD S2•.OU.CJ DEFERRED CGMP EMERGENCY WITHDRAWAL
12b5IC ROSEMOUNT s592.1b INSTRUMENT PARTS
4L 125561 JOSEFH T MTLNSON L SON IN Sb45.64 METAL
00 125512 SAIL7Y ALLEN CORP sob.?. SAFETY SUPPLIES
1 1255C3 SANTA FL INDUSTRIAL PLASTIES s2.520.u6 PLI ING SUPPLIES
1255L4 DUUG SARVIS 337b.u4 FIRST AID/CPR TRAINING
a 1255F5 SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INT•L $137.705.79 OCRAN MONITORING M.0.6-10-92
r 125b C6 SEA EIML ELECTRONICS INC s1.396.aU LAB SUPPLIES
12550 SHAMkOCR SUPPLE 42.472.01 INSTRUMENT PARTS
Ip 12bbL8 SHASIA ELECTRIC sab.398.Y. ELECTRICAL SERVICES J-27
12b51.9 ShUALLUCK SALLS ab.226.15 HARDWARE
� . 12b511 SMITH EMERY C. - 42.562.UY SOIL TESTING M.0.6-10-92
A 125511 SO COAST AIR QUALITY 6I6.UU PERMIT FEES
125512 SUCTH COAST bATLR s95.., WATER USE
Cl 125513 SOUTFLRN CALIF EDISON LO S73s122.1b POWER
125514 SO CAL GAS CU 39.153.16 NATURAL GAS
N 125b15 UESTALLUV INC .817.82 MELDING SUPPLIES
12bb16 SPLL INDUSTRIES INC $597.64 LAB SUPPLIES
125517 SACCO FLEXIBLE $2.125.79 TRUCK PARTS
125516 JAMES STANFILL CUNSTkUg10h S2.406.Yu CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
125519 STATE STRLLT BANN sll•UTS.ub MP TRUSTEE SERVICES
125526 STATLRIVE INSTALLERS _ s116R.JJ LAB SUPPLIES
125b21 SUNSET FCRO 495.55 TRUCK PARTS
12552E SUPELCO INC 464.71 CONNECTORS
12b523 SUFLF THEM CVRP S2.U23.11 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
125594 SUPER FU6Lh FFODUCTS S155.1b JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
125525 TERURAULIIS .118.0 MECHANICAL PARTS
12S526 TEHRAN COMPANY f9.71 G..J LAB SUPPLIRS
125527 THCMFSON INDUSTPIAL SUPPLY 41.155.u1 HARDWARE
125526 TOUY•S LUCK L SAFE SLRVICL 4816.11 LOCKSMITH SERVICES
12b529 TOVI.L CREATIVE SERVICES 5552.b1 PRINTING
12553E TUVO LAND5CAF[NG CU S4.172.37 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.11-13-91
W
Lz
FUND NO 9199 Jl DIST bCRRIN4 CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE lu/14/92 FALL L
RLPONT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SAh IIATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COU BY
CLAIMS PAID 1L/21/92 POSTING DATE 14/21/92
RAMPANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
12S531 TRUCK L AUTO SUFFLY INC 4182.19 TRUCK PARTS
125532 JG TUCAER 6 SON INC /6.85W.29 INSTRUMENT PARTS
125533 TWINING LABORATORIES OF 6.66.5. LAS SUPPLIES
12b535 US ALTO GLASS IENTLRS b133.71 TRUCK PARTS
125535 UNUERGROURU SERVICE ALERT $218.4. CONTRACT SERVICES
125536 VNITLO NCTTINGHAM 51.163..1 RENTAL RQUIPMRNT
a 125537 UNITIO FARCLL SLRVICE SA45.64 PARCEL SERVICES
Gl 12b538 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP »L7... SERVICE AGREEMENT
m 125539 SUPEh INIlNOENT OF DOCUMENTS bSV O.G. SUBSCRIPTION
aZ 125540 VbR SCILNIIFIL $7.767.91 LAB SUPPLIES
12bS61 VALLEY GIRLS SUPFLI CO $788.9V PLUMBING SUPPLIE6
12b542 VLRNE'S PLUMBING b145... PLUMBING SERVICES
12bb43 VENTER SYSTEMS S077.5. COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
m 12b544 WASOINGTOh VISTA INT. hU7LL Sb50.u. TRAINING REGISTRATION
3 125645 WEAThLh AND WIND INSTRUMENT Si91.36 SAFETY SUPPLIES
# 125546 WESTERN HI&M4AY FRUDUCTS IN S3Tb.G5 TRUCK PARTS
W I25547 WESTLRN STATES ChEMICAI SUPFLI 482,961.23 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-0-90
I2S546 LLSTIN ENGINEERING S1.527.39 ENGINEERING SSRVICSS
1 125549 ROURKE . WOODRUFF S ON S1b6A61.65 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92
a 12b55G WJRUYENF ELT CU6F 139..J COMPUTER SOFTWARE
f— 125551 VLNTUhA SOFTWARE INC. b161.b3 SERVICE AGREEMENT
1— 12b5S2 GEORGE YARDLEY CO $569.16 VALVE
12b553 YARDLEY INSTRUMENTS $551.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS
CJ 125bS4 SIEBARTH L ALPEK/C.S. ALIEN 977H68.6L CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1
... .. .. ......
;0 TOTAL CLAIMS PAID L/21/92 S4.172 Jtl5.11
� c_v__cez--zcsecze
C6
N SUMMARY ANOIMT
01 OPER FUND 02,796.1E
01 CAP PAC FUND $57,054.71
02 OPBR FUND $9,405.30
62 CAP PAC PUMD 0596,018.5E
63 OPEN FUND $42,194.99
M3 CAP PAC FUND $241.40
M5 OVER FUND $4,033.37
05 CAP PAC FUND $4,536.74
16 OPER FUND $57.31
07 OPER FUND $13,950.99
07 CAP PAC FOND $1,672.85
011 OPEN FUND $6,721.97
114 OPBR FUND $47.76
914 CAP PAC PUMO $329,706.77
6566 OPEN FUND $1,270.90
0566 CAP SAC FUND $692.50
CA 0761E OPER FUND $2,685.87
a, JT OPER FUND $1.046,625.26
CORP 61,815,355.25
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $84,269.12
JT WORKING CAPITAL $142,949.23
-------------------
CA 177 AAA.11
RESOLUTION NO. 92-155
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF CHLORINE
IN BULK, P FICTI NNO. - 2
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN BULK,
SPECIFICATION NO. C-029, TO DX SYSTEMS COMPANY
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of contract
be made to DX Systems Company for Purchase of Chlorine in Bulk, Specification
No. C-029, and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposal submitted for
said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That a Purchase Contract for Specification No. C-029 be
awarded to DX Systems Company for the price of $229.40 per ton plus sales tax,
furnished and delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of said
specification and the bid proposal therefor, for a one-year period beginning
December 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions upon
mutually-agreeable terms; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign said Purchase Contract with said
supplier to supply chlorine in bulk pursuant to the specifications and purchase
contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said material are hereby
rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992.
"C-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-1"
` COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
BI ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
October 20, 1992
tOBaa EWfi PVENUE
11127
MEMORANDUM Pa Bo.FOR
FWNTNN VP0.EY.OP4E(fPNIP 892B,BI B]
171.19624a11
To: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager
Re: PURCHASE OF CHLORINE IN BULK
SPECIFICATION NO. C-029
Sealed bids were opened Tuesday, October 13, 1992, for the purchase and delivery of
Chlorine in Bulk for a one-year period, beginning December 1, 1992. Tabulation of
bids is as follows:
Unit Price
Vendor Per Ton
1. DX Systems Company S 229.40
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
2. All Pure Chemical Co. 265.00
Santa Fe Springs, CA
3. Jones Chemical NO BID
Torrance, CA
4. Imperial West Chemical Co. NO BID
Antioch, CA
It is recommended the award be made to OX Systems Company, the lowest responsible
bidder, for a one-year contract period, starting December 1, 1992. The total
estimated annual cost of 5917,600.00, plus sales tax, is based on furnishing 4,000
tons at a unit price of $229.40 per ton. Provisions are in the specifications for
four consecutive one-year contract extensions.
Respectf41lly submitted:
Ted Hoffman~
Purchasing Manager
We hereby concur wi h the above recommendation:
G y G. Str Robert J. Ooten
irector o 'nance _ Assistant Director of Operations
IIC-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(a) - ALL DISTRICTS "C-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 92-156
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF FERRIC
CHLORIDE, SPECIFICATION N . P-1
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF FERRIC CHLORIDE, SPECIFICATION
NO. P-136, TO IMPERIAL WEST CHEMICAL COMPANY
t t t t t t t t t k k t k k k t t t
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the
Boards of Directors by the Districts' Purchasing Manager that award of contract
be made to Imperial West Chemical Company for Purchase of Ferric Chloride,
Specification No. P-136, and the bid tabulation and recommendation, and proposal
submitted for said specification are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That a Purchase Contract for Specification No. P-136 be
awarded to Imperial West Chemical Company for the unit price of $204.77 per dry
ton plus sales tax, furnished and delivered in accordance with the terms and
conditions of said specification and the bid proposal therefor, for a one-year
period beginning December 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions
upon mutually-agreeable terns; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 1, acting for
itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14, are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and sign said Purchase Contract with said
supplier to supply ferric chloride pursuant to the specifications and purchase
contract documents therefor, in form approved by the General Counsel ; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said material are hereby
rejected.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992.
"D-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-1"
= COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
el ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
October 20, 1992
101W E.I.AVENUE
MEMORANDUM PC egx 9127
FnUPRAIN VA l Y,uumeMA 92728.8127
TO. J.Wayne Syroester,General Manager ntn asz.xn
FROM: Katherine Yuosh, Senior Buyer
RE: PURCHASE OF FERRIC CHLORIDE SPECIFICATION NO P-136
Sealed bids were opened Tuesday. October 13. 1992 for the purchase and delivery d Femie Chlonde for a one year period beginning
December 1, ifin Tabulation of bide is as followe'
Vendor Cast Par Dry Ton Freight Tmel
1. Imperial West Chemical Co. 6 156AD E48.37 S 204.77
Audi CA
2. E I,du Pont de Nemours 8 Co. 257.95 none 257.95
Wilmington,DE
3. I.G.Industrial Corp. 257.00 5D.00 3D7.00
Pancho Cucamonga.CA
a. Ashland Chemical 1.090.00 240.00 1,330.00
Orange,CA
5. All Pum Chemical Company NO BID
Santa Fe Springs,CA
6. Commerce Chemical Company NO BID
GN or Industry.CA
7. SMP/Lacroix NO BID
Huntington Beads.CA
S. Western States Chemical Supply Corp. NO BID
Orange,CA
9. Jones Chemises.Inc. NO BID
Torrance.CA
it is recommended the award be made to ImOerial Wen Chemieal'Co..the lowest responsible bidder.for a one year smract period.starting
December 1. 1992. The total estimated annual Cost of$1.146.712.00.plus applicable sales tax.is based on furnishing 5,60D tons.at a unit
Few of S2D4.77 per dry ton. The new bid price Is higher than the existing Contact with Imperial West Chemcal Company by$44.66 per
dry ton. Provisions we in the spedfcadons for up to a four one(1)you combed extensions.
Respectfully�submitted:
� E�
�af
Katherina Yaros h,
Senior Buyer
We hereby concur with Me forego/:�B recommendation:
Ted Hof ghan,
Perm ing Manager
treed, Robed J.Ooten
Toreson of Fmn Assume Director of Operations
'-r-'2rr AGENDA ITEM #9(b) - ALL DISTRICTS "D-2rr
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5 '
P. O. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. N0. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: COLICH BROS. , INC. , dba DATE November 18, 1 3
COLICH AND SONS
JOB:_ Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9; and Replacement
of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall , Job No. A -2
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (geduet) $ 212,764.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby
approved.
JOB NO. 1-9
Item 1 - REMOVAL OF 48-INCH CONCRETE ARCH PIPE IN TUNNEL UNDER HAMILTON AVENUE
The Contract Drawings directed the Contractor to remove the existing 48-inch
interplant pipeline inside the new 120-inch pipeline tunnel from Station 145+45
to 146+70 under Hamilton Avenue, for a total length of 125 linear feet. The
existing 48-inch pipe encountered was a solid, steel reinforced poured-in-place
concrete arch (type A) rather than the segmented unreinforced concrete block
pipe (type B) shown on Sheet O-6A of the Contract Drawings. Removal of the Type
A pipe required considerable more labor and equipment in the confined area of
the tunnel . This work included two parallel concrete saw cuts along the bottom
of the concrete arch on both sides, jackhamnering out a circular cut inside the
pipe at 8-foot intervals, cutting reinforcing steel , splitting the pipe apart
from the inside with hydraulic jacks, and removal of the cut and split sections
of pipe with a loader. Removal of the Type B segmented pipe would have
resulted in less effort, as the unreinforced pipe would have been removed in
many pieces, using only the loader. The Districts' record drawings of this
pipeline, installed in 1938, indicate segmented unreinforced block pipe (type B).
This information was given to the Designer for incorporation into the Contract
Drawings. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #5 )
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 30,732.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
"E-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS. , INC. dba DATE November 16, 1992
LICH AND SO
. JOB: Inter lant Pi eline and Utilit Corridor Job No. I-9; and Replacement
of Portion of tandby cean utfall , Job No. J-22-
ITEM 2 - REMOVAL OF 48-INCH CONCRETE ARCH PIPE IN TUNNEL UNDER ADAMS AVENUE
The Contract Drawings directed the Contractor to remove the existing 48-inch
interplant pipeline inside the new 120-inch pipeline tunnel from Station 63+50
to 65+10 under Adams Avenue, for a total length of 160 linear feet. The
existing 48-inch pipe encountered was a solid, steel reinforced poured-in-place
concrete arch (type A) rather than the segmented unreinforced concrete block
pipe (type B) shown on sheet D-6A of the Contract Drawings. Removal of the Type
A pipe required considerable more labor and equipment in the confined area of
the tunnel. This work included two parallel concrete saw cuts along the bottom
of the concrete arch on both sides, jackhamoering out a circular cut inside the
pipe at 8-foot intervals, cutting reinforcing steel , splitting the pipe apart
from the inside with hydraulic jacks, and removal of the cut and split sections
of pipe with a loader. Removal of the Type B segmented pipe would have resulted
in less effort, as the unreinforced pipe would have been removed in many pieces.
using only the loader. The Districts' record drawings of this piepline,
installed in 1938, indicate segmented unreinforced block pipe (type B). This
information was given to the Designer for incorporation into the Contract
Drawings. This work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #6 )
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 30,807.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 3 - REMOVAL OF UNDISCLOSED MANHOLE
An undisclosed concrete manhole was encountered at Station 63+70 during
tunneling operations for the 120-inch pipeline under Adams Avenue. Upon
investigation, the concrete manhole base and shafting was found to be integrated
into the existing 48-inch interplant pipeline. Removal of this manhole was
required in order to continue with construction of the tunnel and installation
of the new 120-inch interplant pipeline. The Contractor was directed to remove
interfering portions of the manhole base and shafting and proceed with
tunneling operations. Work included in this item consisted of saw cutting the
concrete base inside the tunnel , breaking up the pieces with a jackhammer and
removing with a loader. Shafting was removed separately from outside of the
tunnel . The Contract Drawings did not show this manhole nor require its
removal . This item of work was accomplished on a time and material basis
pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #4)
�...✓ ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 15,267.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
"E-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: COLICH BROS. , INC. dba DATE November 18, 1992
COLICH AND TO7H
JOB: Interplant Pipeline and Uti lit Corridor, Job No. I-9• and Replacement
of Portion of Standby Ocean utfal , ob No. J-2 -2
ITEM 4 - FIBEROPTIC PULL BOX ADDITION
The Contractor was directed to furnish and install three additional fiberglass
pull boxes inside Tunnel No. 8 at Reclamation Plant 1. The pull boxes were
necessary to allow the Contractor to pull the new f1beroptic interplant cable
inside the tunnel area of Plant 1 to the new Control Center. Without the
additional pull boxes, the excessive number of conduit bends and offsets in the
tunnel area would have made installation of the cable an impossibility. Work
associated with this item consisted of furnishing and installing two each
30-inch x 24-inch x 12-inch NEMA 4X and one each 36-inch x 48-inch x 16-inch
NEMA 4X pull boxes and conduit connectors in three locations inside Tunnel
No. 8. The Contract Drawings and Detailed Specifications did not specify pull
boxes to be installed in the tunnel area of Reclamation Plant 1. This item of
work was accomplished on a time and material basis pursuant to Section
10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO #3)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,352.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
ITEM 5 - TALBERT MARSH MITIGATION
The Contractor was directed to perform grading work on the talbert Channel as
shown on revised Contract Drawing Nos. 2, 3, 4 and new Drawing No. 6. This work
consisted of removing approximately 9500 cubic yards in the mud fiats area
between Reclamation Plant 2 and Pacific Coast Highway and filling approximately
6000 cubic yards of the old Talbert Channel in the same area adjacent to the
Santa Ana River. Also included in this item was an extension of the existing
plant water piping system to serve future landscaping needs for the Huntington
Beach Wetlands Conservancy. The work covered by this item was not included in
the original contract as the Districts had not received permits from the
Department of the Army, ERA, State Fish and Game and Coastal Commission at the
time Contracts I-9 and J-22-2 went out to bid. This work was negotiated with
the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(B)2(a) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH #2)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 117,205.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 7 Calendar Days
"E-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
�.,.� C. 0. NO. Two (2)
CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS. , INC. dba DATE November 18, 192
OLI H AND SON
JOB: In lant Pi eline and Utilit Corridor Job No. I-9• and Replacement
of Portion of Stantlby Ocean utfall , Job No. J-22-
ITEM 6 - SALES TAX ADJUSTMENT -
Job No. I-9 and Job No. J-22-2 were bid based on a sales tax rate of 6.5 percent
for purchased materials. Section 51, the contract proposal , allows the
Contractor to submit invoices and obtain a sales tax adjustment based on the
increase in sales tax rate over 6.5 percent during the life of the contract.
The sales tax adjustment Included in this item is based on material invoices
submitted by the Contractor from October 21, 1991 through June 12, 1992. This
Item was accomplished on a time and material basis pursuant to Section
10-6(B)2(b) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 12,401.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 212,764.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 7 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that seven days
extension of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but
that no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses
or damages have been or will be Incurred by Contractor, except as expressly
granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date September 11, 1991
Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date May 2, 1993
Time Extension this C.O. 7 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 23 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 623 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date May 25, 1993
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 21 328 600.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 12 228 1 1. 0
This Change (Add) (Dedue8) $ ,764.00
Amended Contract Price $ 1,5 9,5 5.00
"E-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(C) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Two 2
CONTRACTOR: COUCH BROS. INC. dba DATE November 1 1 2
COLI H AN
JOB: Interplant Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job No. I-9
Board Authorization Date: November 18, 1992
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SUBMITTED BY:
RECOMMENDED BY:
.(Engineering managei ebnstructiodManager Da e
APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO (F,ORRM:
m �Z wy Y1'z0-g .l7kta� O .�'l"
erector of Engineering Date eneral ounsel a e
COLICH BROS., INC., dba COLICH AND SONS
ACCEPTED BY:
0-19�9Z
CdAtractor Date
"E-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(c) - ALL DISTRICTS "E-5"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
`..� FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fifteen (1915)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE Novem Fr 18, 92
JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 9,759.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes In the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby
approved.
Item 1 - BATTERY SYSTEM CABLE °
This item is for providing twenty-four VDC control power circuits to the medium
voltage switchgear. Conduit and wire are routed to provide for future
installation of battery systems fuses and clips. This item was negotiated with
the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(1) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH No. J191-037)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,873.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM:- 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - RACEWAY AND CABLE FOR CHILLER FLOW SWITCHES
This item is for providing conduit and cables for chiller flow switches FSL-453
and FSL-473. The required conduit and cables were shown incorrectly routed to
the TE-473 and TE-453 in the contract documents. This item includes cost for
replacing conduit already installed by the Contractor. This item was negotiated
with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(1) of the General Provisions.
(Reference: PCH No. J191-057)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 2,180.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 3 - RACEWAY AND CABLE FOR NEUTRAL GROUNDING TRANSFORMER
This item is for providing raceway and cable for the interconnection of the
grounding transformer neutral CT to the medium voltage switchgear. This item
was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(1) of the
General Provisions. (Reference: PCH No. J191-050)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,528.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"F-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fifteen (15)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE November 18, 1 2
JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1
Item 4 - MISCELLANEOUS SUPPORTS, GRATING AND RAILING MODIFICATIONS
This item is for modifying aluminum handrails to clear engine flywheels,
modifying engine grating supports conflicting with the flywheel guards, and
trimning grating support angles to allow installation of lube oil tubing to the
engines. Work was required at each of the three engines and includes painting
of the modified supports. This item was negotiated with Contractor pursuant to
Section 10-6(b)(1) of the General Provisions. (Reference: RFI Nos. J191-192,
200 and 202) C
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 4,178.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 9,759.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days 1 /
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
Issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required
for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential
costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor,
except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date February 21, 1991
Original Contract Time 600 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date October 12, 1992
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 103 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 703 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date January 23, 1993
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 15 410 855.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 5,686.
This Change (Add) (Bedust) $ �J
Amended Contract Price $ 1�520
"F-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fifteen (15)
CONTRACTOR: HUNTER CORPORATION DATE Novem er 18, 1992
JOB: Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1
Board Authorization Date: November 18, 1992
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY: / / REC,O�MMENENDED BY:
, , nq neering Manager construction Manager Date
APPROVED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Director of Engineer ng ate Cieneqyl Lounsel Me
HUNTER CORPORATION
ACCEPTED BY:
(wry A 1a-8-kz-
Contractor Date
"F-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(d) - ALL DISTRICTS "F-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fifteen ("I
CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE November 9
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (geduet) $ 75,527.46
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby
approved.
Item 1 - SIGNAL CABLE
The Contract Drawings did not provide for the required signal cable for the
watts transducer in the electrical switchgear to each of the five engine control
panels furnished by the Districts. This provides for the monitoring of the
total power generated that is essential in operating the Central Generation
Facility. The Contractor was instructed to furnish the necessary labor, conduit
and wiring on a negotiated firm lump sum basis in accordance with General
Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2)(A). (Reference: Brown a Caldwell letter dated
January 13, 1992 and PCH No. 084).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,892.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - REVISE ELECTRICAL CABLE SPLICES
Staff determined that standard butt splice for high voltage electrical cable
are better suited for the condition in which they will be installed instead of
the specified multi tap cable splice kit which is a mechanical splice. The
standard splices will be in electrical manholes where water is present and are
more waterproof than the mechanical splice. The Contractor was instructed to
use the standard splice on the cable on a negotiated basis in accordance with
General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(A). (Reference: PCH No. 086).
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (10,923.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"G-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
�..� CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fifteen ("I
CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE November 19, 1 92
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2
Item 3 - REPLACE CABLE RACKS
Upon entry into the four existing electrical manholes in order to pull and
splice the 12KV high voltage cable, the existing cable racks were found to be
badly deteriorated. The deterioration was due to the racks, which are
constructed of galvanized steel channels, standing in water. The Contractor was
instructed to provide new racks constructed of fiberglass on a time and material
basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2)(B). (Reference:
PCH No. 090)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 21,786.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 - CONTROLS FOR STEAM TURBINE
The Contract Drawings and Specifications did not provide for the electrical
power or operating controls of the Contractor furnished steam turbine unit in
the Central Generation Facility. This included power for the vacuum recirculation
water pumps, interface between the steam turbine and the medium voltage
switchgear to disperse the power produced by the steam turbine generator,
Interface between turbine control panel provided by the Districts and the
switchgear and other operating controls. The Contractor was instructed to
provide the conduit, wiring and labor necessary on a force account basis in
accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(2)(b)(B). (Reference Brown 8
Caldwell letters dated January 6, and February 20, 1992 and PCH No. 094).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 41,859.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 5 - ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT TESTING
Due to the many additions to the electrical circuits that were not a part of the
original contract documents, additional NETA Testing was required. META
(National Electrical Testing Association) testing is a standard by which the
testing of the differential circuits for the generators and distribution systems
were performed. This testing is performed by licensed specialty contractors
only. The Contractor was instructed to perform the work on a negotiated firm
price basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b) (2) (A).
(Reference: PCH No. 103).
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 6,100.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"G-2" AGENDA ITEM WE) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fifteen CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE November 18, 1(1 25)
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2
Item 6 - PUMP STRAINER PIPING
The contract drawings provided for the three inch blow off drain line from the
plant water strainer located in the Plant water Pump Station to a floor drain
and from there to an existing sump pump. When the strainer activated and
discharged the cleaning water, the eisiting drain and sump pump system was found
to be inadequate, causing flooding of the area and damaging electrical equipment.
The Contractor was instructed to reroute the blow off drain line to an existing
sump pump discharge header and adding an isolation and a check valve. The work
was performed on a force account in accordance with General Provisons Section
10-6(b) (2)(B). (Reference PCH No. 1D2)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 8,296.17
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 7 - SEAL CONTROL ROOM
The contract drawings did not provide for the sealing of the Operating Control
Room in the Central Generation Facilities, particularly where electrical duct
banks entered the floor and in the ceiling that is covered with corregated roof
deck. During the operation of the engines, fumes would drift into the Control
Room creating an irritating atmosphere. Also, the seal on the electrical
duct bank would restrain flames and fumes from entering the room in the event of a
fire. The Contractor was instructed to install the seals on a force account
basis in accordance with General Provisions Section 10-6(b)(2)(B). (Reference
PCH No. 104)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,245.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 8 - REPLACE PRESSURE SWITCHES
The pressure switches as specified in the contract documents for the two
Instrument Air Compressors created problems in the operation of said
compressors. The units would operate for only a short period of time and then
shut down. Then they would start up again causing the starters to overheat.
The Contractor was instructed to provide new adjustable differential pressure
switches on a force account basis in accordance with General Provisions Section
10-6(b)(2)(B). (Reference Brown and Caldwell 's letter dated May 6, 1992,
RFI No. 365 and PCH No. 105)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,272.29
TIME ESTERNSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days `...�
"G-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
�.� CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fifteen ("I
CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE Novembers 8, 199192
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2 -
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 75,527.46
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is
required for this Change Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred
by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order..
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date March 19, 1990
Original Contract Time 730 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date March 17, 1992
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 218 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 948 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date October 21, 1992
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 19,753000.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 1,598:469.64
This Change (Add) (Beoust) $ 75,527.46
Amended Contract Price $ 21,426,997.1
"G-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 5
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHARGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fifteen (151
CONTRACTOR: BRINDERSON CORPORATION DATE November 18, 1992
JOB: CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2
Board Authorization Date: November 18, .1992
COUNTY OF SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED /BY:
RECOMMENDED BY:
EWneer ng anager a Construction Manager Date
APPROV D BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
a /s,
ctorf Engineering a e e( Counsel Date
BRINDERSON CORPORATION
ACCEPTED BY:
Contractor
"G-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(e) - ALL DISTRICTS "G-5"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 6
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fourteen (14)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE November 18, 1992
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 1U at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare
Facilities at Plants 1 antl 2, Job No. J-21
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Dedaet) $ 20,044.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or.deductions from the contract price are hereby
approved.
Job No. PI-34-3
Item 1 - ADDED VAPOR SEALS TO POWER BUILDING 5
The Contractor was directed to add vapor seals around the power cable leading
from the basement of Power Building 5 into the switchgear located in the main
floor of this building. This allows cable to pass from a classified area to a
non-classified area without violating the NFPA-820 code. Vapor seals for this
area were not shown on the contract drawings. This area was classified as a
change order during construction on the P1-34-1 project and as such as not
included in the P1-34-3 project. The work was accomplished on a force account
basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (B) of the General Provisions. (Reference:
FCO-P1343-051)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 3,062.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 2 - DELETE CONCRETE SEALER ON EXTERIOR DIGESTER WALLS
The Contractor was directed to delete the specified concrete sealer on the
exterior digester walls. It was determined that the specified sealer was not
necessary and may in fact compromise the conformity of the "sacked" concrete
surfaces. The credit was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2)(A) of the General Provisions. (Reference FCO-P1343-055)
CREDIT THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ (3,500.00)
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"H-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 6
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fourteen (13)
19 CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE November 18, 92
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 1 at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, J0b No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare
Facilities at Plants I and 2, Job No. J-21
Item 3 - MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING PIPING TO ACCOMMODATE NEW SLUDGE METERS
The contract plans called for two 4-inch magnetic flow meters to be installed
into an existing 4-inch diameter pipe. The existing line was discovered to be
actually 6 inches in diameter. The Contractor was directed to add four 6" x 4"
reducers to shorten the 4-inch pipe lengths included in the meter sections in
order to accommodate the existing piping. This item includes the extra labor
and materials associated with the reducers which were not shown on the contract
plans. The work was negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section
10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-P1343-048)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 944.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 4 - ADDED ACCESS TO JUNCTION BOXES
The contract provides for two ,)unction boxes to be installed below grade into an
existing 12-inch RCP storm drain line located in the East Perimeter Road. Due
to previous history with the existing line and the limited access for cleaning,
the Contractor was directed to raise the boxes to grade, thereby adding access
to the two referenced boxes. In order to reduce costs, the Districts furnished
manhole covers and frames to the Contractor. The remaining work of added
framing, concrete and adjusting the manhole to grade was negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2) (A). (Reference: PCH-P1343-017)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 635.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"H-2" AGENDA ITEM #9( f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 6
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fourteen (14)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE November 18, 1992
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: Construction of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of waste Digester Gas Flare
Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21
Item 5 - SLUDGE PRESSURE RELIEF MODIFICATIONS
The Contractor was directed to install three 3-inch safety relief valves for the
bottom sludge transfer pumps. The contract documents did not clearly show the
required valve size . The Contractor sized the valves as 2 inches from infor-
mation received from the pump manufacturer and the valve manufacturer. The
District required 3-inch valves to eliminate the possibility of future clogging.
This item provides for the difference in material costs only difference between
the 2-inch and 3-inch valve sizes. The costs were negotiated with the
Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 940.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
�i Item 6 - RELOCATE SUPPLY FANS
In order to conform to NFPA-820, the fire protection code used as a design
criteria for the project, the Contractor was directed to relocate the supply fans
on the roof of Control Building 11-14. The fans were located in a hazardous
area per the contract drawings and as such would require explosion-proof housing
in order to meet the code. The most cost-effective solution was to move the
fans out of the classified area and extend the ductwork out to reach the new
location. This item includes labor and material for the installation of 24
feet of additional fiberglass ductwork associated with two supply fans. This
work was performed on a force account basis pursuant to Section 10-6(b) (2) (A) of
the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-P1343-050)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 9,956.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 7 - RELOCATE STAIRS ON CONTROL BUILDING ROOF
The Contractor was directed to relocate the stairways on the Control Building
11-14 roof when they were discovered to interfere with the HVAC ductwork not yet
installed. The two stairways which lead from the roof area up to the digester
domes were installed per plans before the conflict was discovered. The most
cost effective solution was to relocate the stairs to a new location to avoid
the interference. The work was performed on a force account basis pursuant to
Section 10-6(b) (2) of the General Provisions. (Reference: FCO-P1343-054)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,078.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
"H-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-3"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 4 of 6
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fourteen (14)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE November 18, 1992
Zurn instructors, Inc.
JOB: Construction of Di esters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
Job No. P1- 4-3: Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 0 at Reclamation
Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-21 and Installation of waste Digester Gas Flare
Facilities at Plants 1 and 2. Job No. J-21
Item 8 - INSTALL VALVE OPERATORS AT DIGESTERS 7 8 8
The installation of these valves was not shown on the contract plans. The
Contractor was directed to install pneumatic valve operators on sludge feed
valves for Digesters 7 and 8. The valve operators are Districts furnished and
are necessary in order for the new Digester Control System to automatically feed
these digesters. The electrical wiring hook-up was shown on the contract
drawings to existing valves. The extra work included in this item is the
installation of the operator and high pressure air piping. This work was
negotiated with the Contractor pursuant to Section 10-6(b)(2)(A) of the General
Provisions. (Reference: PCH-P1343-016)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 1,073.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
Item 9 - EXTERIOR LIGHTING MODIFICATIONS
The Contractor was directed to make several modifications to the exterior
lighting fixtures in an effort to provide safe and satisfactory lighting around
the digester facility. The modifications included the repositioning of some of
the exterior lights over doorways and the addition of four D-1 light fixtures.
The work was performed on a force account basis pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)(B) of the General Provisions, (Reference: FCO-P1343-047)
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 5,856.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 0 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 20,044.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
Dncidental to the prime work within the time allotted for the original Contract
and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued
Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time extension is
required for this Change Order, and that no direct or indirect, incidental or
consequential costs, expenses, losses or damages have been or will be incurred
by Contractor, except as expressly granted and approved by this Change Order.
"H-4" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-4"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 5 of 6
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fourteen (14)
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors, Division of DATE November 18, 1992
Zurn Constructors, Inc.
JOB: Construction of Di Nsters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1
Job NO. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and 10 at Reclamation
_ Plant No. I, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste Digester Gas Flare
acilities at Plants 1 and 2, Jo No. J-21
SUMMARY OF MILESTONE TIME
Job No. P1-35-2
Original Contract Date January 26, 1991
Original Milestone Time 365 Calendar Days
Original Milestone Completion Date January 27, 1992
Milestone Modification This Change Order 0 Calendar Days
Total Milestone Modification 28 Calendar Days
Revised Milestone Time 393 Calendar Days
Revised Milestone Date February 24, 1992
Job No. J-21
Original Contract Date January 28, 1991
Original Milestone Time 180 Calendar Days
Original Milestone Completion Date July 26, 1991
Milestone Modification This Change Order 0 Calendar Days
Total Milestone Modification 25 Calendar Days
Revised Milestone Time 205 Calendar Days
Revised Milestone Date August 20, 1991
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Job No. P1-34-3
Original Contract Date January 28, 1991
Original Contract Time - 900 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date July 15, 1993
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 27 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 927 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date - August 11, 1993
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 27,205,378.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 632,315.54
This Change (Add) (Deduct) $ 20,044.00
Amended Contract Price $ 27,857,737.54
"H-5" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-5"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 6 of 6
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Fourteen (141
CONTRACTOR: Advanco Constructors Division of DATE Novem er 88, 19
urn onstruc ors, nc.
JOB: Construction of Di esters Nos. 11-16 at Reclamation Plant No. 1,
To o. P1- - ehabilitation of Di esters 9 and 30 at Reclamation
Plant No. 1 Job o. P1-35- ; and Installation of aste Digester tias Flare
Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J- 1
Board Authorization Date: November 18, 1992
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SUBMITTED BY:
RECOMMENDED BY:
—fz— L
9ineering Manager Date f,6nstruction Manager Date
APPROVE BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ZIel,7�
Director o ngine r ng Date enera ounsel awe
ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS, DIVISION OF
ZURN CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
ACCEPTED BY:
4 AV
e
rontrac t r Date
d aRA✓ � ��NNS.,-�5�'�
"H-6" AGENDA ITEM #9(f) - ALL DISTRICTS "H-6"
RESOLUTION NO. 92-157
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN A IFORNIA
EDISON COMPANY
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF
DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT
TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR
RIGHT-OF-WAY TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN SCEC
EQUIPMENT TO ACCOMMODATE THE INTERCONNECTION
OF CENTRAL POWER GENERATION SYSTEM AT
TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. J-19-2
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated November 18, 1992,
wherein the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County grant a service
easement to the Southern California Edison Company (SCEC) for right-of-way
required to operate and maintain SCEC's substation at Plant No. 2 to accommodate
the interconnection Of Central Power Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2,
Job No. J-19-2, is hereby approved; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement 1s granted is
more particularly described and shown on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a
part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That said easement 1s granted to Southern California Edison
Company for construction and operation of the substation in order to transform
incoming 66 kV power to 12 kV for usage by the Districts; and,
Section 4. That said easement is granted at no cost to Southern
California Edison Company; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District
"I-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(9) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-1"
No. 1, `acting for itself and on behalf of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6. 7, 11. 13
and 14, are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Grant of Easement in
form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting November 18, 1992.
`ems'
"I-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(9) - ALL DISTRICTS "I-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 2
P. 0. BOX 8227 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Eight (6)
CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE November 18, 1 2
JOB: Portion of Euclid Inter ce for Sewer between Broadwa and Orangethor e
Avenue (including City of Anaheim treet mprovemen s ontract o. 2-26-3;
Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and walnut reet Ninth Street
Contra -28; and Orangewood D version Sewer, Contract No. 2-2
Amount of this Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ 29,774.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract
and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the
following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
Contract No. 2-29
Item 1 - REMOBILIZE TO COMPLETE CONTRACT 2-29
A portion of the contract work was demobilized due to undisclosed telephone
ductbanks at the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and State College Boulevard.
These undisclosed ductbanks interfered with the completion of the installation of
the new sewer line per Change Order No. 1, Item 5. This item is for additional
work including transporting the remaining pipe to be installed from Plant No. 2
to the job site, demobilization and remobilization of the Contractor's labor,
materials and equipment, replacement of curbs and gutters, sidewalks and
additional paving. This work could not be completed until PACBELL relocated the
Interfering ductbanks. The time extension for this delay is 128 days. This
item of work was accomplished by Contractor's force account pursuant to Section
10-6(b)(2)B of the General Provisions.
ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: $ 29,774.00
TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER ITEM: 128 Calendar Days
TOTAL ADDED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ 29,774.00
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 128 Calendar Days
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed
Incidental to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original
Contract and any extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously
issued Change Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that 128 days extension
of time to perform the work is required for this Change Order, but that no
direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses, losses or
damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor, except as expressly granted
and approved by this Change Order.
"J-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "J-1"
UVUNiY JANO AIIUN U"IKIWb Uh UNANUt CUUNIT Page 2 of Y
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE `
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. El hit (8) 1
CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE November 18.
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interce for Sewer between Broadwayand Oran ethor e
Avenue ncludin 1 of Anahim e treet m rovements ontract No. -2 -3;
Kate l a Relief Sewer, between EUCIId Street and wa nut Street Ninth Street) ,
Contract No. -2 and Orangewood Diversion ewer, ontract No. -2Z
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date December 31, 1990
Original Contract Time 400 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date February 3, 1992
Time Extension this C.O. 128 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 128 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 528 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date June 11, 1992
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price E 7 953 755.00
Prey. Auth. Changes $—"170 958
—
This Change (Add) (Bedust) E * 0
Amended Contract Price $ ,t% /44,4b/.btl -
Board Authorization Date: November 18, 1992
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED BY: R 0 I NDED BY,
ngineer ng Manager Date Cionstruction Manager Date
AP OV Y:/ APP VED AS TO FORM:
Patec or of Engineering ate eneral Cou sel ate
STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION
ACCEPTED BY: � ��pp
c.Y,ru� o zo 9t-
ntracto Date
"J-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (1) - DISTRICT 2 "J-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 1 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Nine (9)
CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE November 18, 1992
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Oran ethor a Avenue
including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) , contract No. 2-26-3; Katella
Relief Sewer. between Euclid Street and walnut Street Ninth Street F Contract
No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29
Amount of this Change Order (Add4 (Deduct) $ (94,677.50)
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes In the contract and/or
contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following
additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved.
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
ADD:
Change in
Item Quantity Unit
No. Unit Description From To Difference Price TOTAL
5 LF 33-inch VCP 160.00 163.00 3.00 $ 190.00 = $ 570.00
30 VF 120-inch Manholes 22.00 22.50 0.50 1,400.00 = 700.00
25 EA Remove Manholes 17.00 21.00 4.00 500.00 = 2,000.00
41 LF 27-inch VCP 2450.00 2456.00 6.00 150.00 = 900.00
60 VF 84-inch Manholes 60.00 69.75 9.75 750.00 = 7,312.50
71 EA Adjust Manholes 4.00 5.00 1.00 300.00 = 300.00
SUBTOTAL = $11,782.50
DEDUCT:
Change in
Item Quantity Unit
No. Unit Description From To Difference Price TOTAL
3 LF 48-inch RCP 7200.00 7196.00 4.00 $310.00 = ($1,240.00)
7 VF 84-inch Manholes 260.00 189.50 70.50 840.00 = (59,220.00)
8 VF 72-inch Manholes 26.00 24.50 1.50 960.00 = ( 1,440.00)
11 VF 96-inch Manholes 12.00 0.00 12.00 1,000.00 = (12,000.00)
30 LF 24-inch VCP 85.00 84.00 1.00 140.00 = ( 140.00)
31 LF 12-inch VCP 160.00 155.00 5.00 100.00 = ( 500.00)
33 LF 8-inch VCP 330.00 327.00 3.00 90.00 = ( 270.00)
35 LF 8-inch VCP 100.00 80.00 20.00 120.00 = ( 2,400.00)
36 EA 48-inch Manholes 6.00 5.00 1.00 4,500.00 = ( 4,500.00)
43 VF 72-inch Manholes 60.00 58.50 1.50 700.00 = ( 1,050.00)
69 TONS Asphalt 5790.00 5535.00 255.00 40.00 = (10,200.00)
72 SY Cold Planing 6100.00 1600.00 4500.00 3.00 = (13,500.00)
SUBTOTAL = (106,460.00)
TOTAL DEDUCTED COST THIS CHANGE ORDER: $ ( 94,677.50)
TOTAL TIME EXTENSION THIS CHANGE ORDER: 0 Calendar Days
"K-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "K-1"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 2 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8127 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Nine (9)
CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE November 18, 1992
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadwa and Orange hor e
Avenue including City of Anaheim Street Improvements , Contract No. 2-25-3;
Kat�Rel ief Sewer, between Euclid Street and walnut Street Nf nth Street
Contract No. 2-2 ; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29
The additional work contained within this Change Order can be performed incidental
to the prime work and within the time allotted for the original Contract and any
extensions to the Contract Time made by this and all previously issued Change
Orders. It is therefore mutually agreed that no time is required for this Change
Order, and no direct or indirect, incidental or consequential costs, expenses,
losses or damages have been or will be incurred by Contractor.
SUMMARY OF CONTRACT TIME
Original Contract Date December 31, 1990
Original Contract Time 400 Calendar Days
Original Completion Date February 3, 1992
Time Extension this C.O. 0 Calendar Days
Total Contract Time Extension 128 Calendar Days
Revised Contract Time 528 Calendar Days
Revised Final Completion Due Date June 11, 1992
Actual Final Completion Date Not Applicable
Time Subject to Liquidated Damages Not Applicable
Original Contract Price $ 7,953,755.00
Prev. Auth. Changes $ 790,712.58
This Change (Addy (Deduct) $ 94,577.50
Amended Contract Price $ 8,853,790.08
"K-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "K-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Page 3 of 3
P. 0. BOX 8227 - 10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708
\� CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO. Nine (9)
CONTRACTOR: Steve Bubalo Construction DATE November 18, 1992
JOB: Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadwa and Oran ethor e
Avenue including City of Anaheim Street Improvements , Contract No. -3;
Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and walnut Street Ninth . treet
Contract No. 2-28; and.OrangewoodDiversi�ewer, o� ntract No. �
Board Authorization Date: November 18, 1992
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RECOMMENDED �B/Y: l / RECOMMENDED BY:
Cis.- _f N.,^..-.�. /O _U-9z &;?-
Engineering Manager Date Colftstruction Manager Date
APPROV BY: APPROVED
AS TO yFORM:
rector of ng veering ate rjeneral counsel —bate
STEVE BUBALO CONSTRUCTION
ACCEPTED BY:
ontractor Date
"K-3" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (2) - DISTRICT 2 "K-3"
RESOLUTION NO. 92-159-2
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NOS. 2-26-3 2-28 AND
2-29 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING PORTION OF EUCLID INTERCEPTOR
SEWER, BETWEEN BROADWAY AND ORANGETHORPE AVENUE
(INCLUDING CITY OF ANAHEIM STREET IMPROVEMENTS),
CONTRACT NO. 2-26-3; KATELLA RELIEF SEWER, BETWEEN
EUCLID STREET AND WALNUT STREET (NINTH STREET) ,
CONTRACT NO. 2-28; AND ORANGEWOOD DIVERSION SEWER,
CONTRACT NO. 2-29, AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
k k k k k k k R k k k k k k k k
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Steve Bubalo Construction Co., has
completed the construction In accordance with the terms of the contract for
Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue
(including City of Anaheim Street Improvements), Contract No. 2-26-3; Katella
Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street) , Contract
No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, on June 11, 1992;
and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Director of Engineering has
recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with
the terns of the contract, which said recommendation is hereby received and
ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and
Orangethorpe Avenue (including City of Anaheim Street Improvements) , Contract
No. 2-26-3; Katella Relief Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street
(Ninth Street) , Contract No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract
No. 2-29, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the
la,sl
"L-1" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (3) - DISTRICT 2 "L-1"
contract therefor, dated December 31, 1990; and,
Section 4. That the Districts' Director of Engineering is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion therefor; and,
Section 5. That the Final Closeout Agreement with Steve Bubalo
Construction Co., setting forth the terns and conditions for acceptance of
Portion of Euclid Interceptor Sewer, between Broadway and Orangethorpe Avenue
(including City of Anaheim Street Improvements), Contract 2-26-3; Katella Relief
Sewer, between Euclid Street and Walnut Street (Ninth Street) , Contract
No. 2-28; and Orangewood Diversion Sewer, Contract No. 2-29, is hereby approved
and accepted in form approved by the General Counsel ; and,
Section 6. That the Chairman and Secretary of District No. 2 are hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992.
"L-2" AGENDA ITEM #9(h) (3) - DISTRICT 2 "L-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 92-160-7
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
ANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN ALIF RNIA
E ISON OMPAN
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY
TO OPERATE AND MAINTAIN SCEC EQUIPMENT
WHICH WILL PROVIDE POWER TO MICHELSON PUMP
STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-11-2
x x x x x x x x x x x x x
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange
County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated November 18, 1992,
wherein the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County grant a service
easement to the Southern California Edison Company (SCEC) to operate and
maintain SCEC equipment in the vicinity of Michelson Avenue and the San Diego
Freeway east of Jamboree Boulevard, in the City of Irvine, which will provide
power to the Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2, is hereby approved;
and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is
more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B", attached hereto
and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That said easement is granted to Southern California Edison
Company for maintenance and repair of the voltage transformer and conduits
necessary to provide electrical service to Michelson Pump Station, Contract
No. 7-11-2; and,
Section 4. That said easement is granted at no cost to Southern
California Edison Company; and, l ,
"M-1" AGENDA ITEM #9( 1 ) - DISTRICT 7 "M-1"
Section 5. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District
No. 7 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Grant of Easement in
form approved by the General Counsel.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992.
"M-2" AGENDA ITEM #90 ) - DISTRICT 7 "M-2"
RESOLUTION NO. 92-158
REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR CONTRACT NO. P2-23-5-1
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 AND 14 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
REJECTING ALL BIDS FOR OPERATIONS CENTER EXPANSION
AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-23-5-1, AND AUTHORIZING
THE GENERAL MANAGER TO ESTABLISH THE DATE FOR REBID
OF SAID PROJECT
k k k k k k * * k * * * * * k
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY DETERMINE THAT:
WHEREAS, the Districts have published Notice Inviting Bids for Operations
Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1, in accordance with the
provisions of Section 20783 of the Public Contracts Code of the State of
California, and on October 6, 1992, publicly opened and read all bids submitted;
and,
WHEREAS, nine bids have been received on Operations Center Expansion at
Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1, of which three protests have been filed against
Javaid Contractors, Inc. , the apparent low bidder, based on bidding
irregularities and lack of bonding capacity by the Surety named on the low
bidder's proposal ; and,
WHEREAS, correspondence from the Center of Contract Compliance alleging
violations against the law and second bidders of Labor Code 1774 on other jobs
within this region has been received; and,
WHEREAS, Staff and General Counsel have recommended that all bids be
rejected and the project rebid.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the bid tabulation and recommendation of the Director of
Engineering to reject all bids be received and ordered filed; and, I
"N-1" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-1"
Section 2. That all bids for said work be, and are hereby, rejected; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager be authorized to establish a bid date
for rebid of said project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting held November 18, 1992.
"N-2" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-2"
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS;
e1 ORANGE COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
October 6, 1992 1O Ews AVENUE
?O WXa,27
11:00 a.m. MWAN VALLEY.GUFORM I a,
Two (2) Addenda n,ei s�zza„
BID TABULATION
H E ET
JOB NO. 122-23-5-1
PROJECT TITLE Operations Center Expansion at Plant No. 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Addition of new locker rooms, offices and remodeling
of existing roams at Plant No. Operations Center
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $2,800,000.00 BUDGET AMOUNT $2,925,000
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Javaid Contractors, Inc. , Rowland Heights, CA $2,537,193.00
2. The Gorham Co. , Inc. , Corona, CA $2,612,130.00
3. Lewis Jorge Construction Management, Inc. ,
Baldwin Park, CA $29614,229.00*
4. Jahn R. Hundley, Inc., Garden Grove, CA - $2,716,107.00 v
5. Nationwide Construction Company, Inc.
Paramount, CA $2,748,692.00
6. K. W. Western, Inc., Newport Beach, CA $2,824,000.00
7. Hayward Construction Company, Inc.,
Monrovia, CA $2,887,783.00*
8. A. R. Willinger Co. , Inc. , Newport Beach, CA $2,980,000.00
9. Chartered Construction Co., Los Angeles, CA $3,238,400.00*
*Corrected totals--addition errors.
I have reviewed the proposals and the protests received for the above projects
and recommend that all bids be rejected.
7h
(Thomas M. Dawes -
Director of Engineering
"N-3" AGENDA ITEM #13(b) (3) - ALL DISTRICTS "N-3"
COUNTY SANITATION
u
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 29 3, 59 69 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
ON
OCTOBER 14, 1992
\� PNJTATloV
o9°libe Q°0/s
V R s N
N
GEC
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
9
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
ROLL CALL
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1,
2, 3, S. 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on October 14, 1992,
at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts- Administrative Offices. Fall wing the Pledge of
Allegiance and Invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a quoran present
for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11. 13 and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: x Dan Griset, Chairman Robert Richardson
=Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tom —Gene Beyer
ma=Thos R. Saltarelli —Leslie A. Pontious
7--Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth
z James A. Xahner _James Ferryman
DISTRICT NO. 2: Henry N. Metlae, Chairman x John M. Gullixson
=Jonn Collins, Chairman pro tom —George Scott
=Fred Barrera —_Gene Beyer
a Buck Catlin Chris Norby
—Barry Denes =Bob Bell
=William D. Mahoney James H. Flora
=Robert H. Main —Norman Culver
=Carrey J. Nelson —Glenn Parker
a Arthur G. Newton —John 0. Tynes
a Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter
—Miguel Pulido z Dan Griset
=Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Saplen, Chairman Harry M. Dotson
x Burnie Dunlap. Chairman pro cam —Carrey J. Nelson
7—Buck Catlin —Chris Narby
=John Collins —_George Scott
=Noonan Culver Robert H. Main
=James V. Evans —Margie L. Rice
=James H. Flora —William 0. Mahoney
=Don R. Griffin —_Rhonda J. McCune
=Frank Laszlo _Gwen A. Forsythe
a Pat McGuigan Robert Richardson
=Eva G. Miner —_Larry Herman
\ / Richard Partin Cecilia L. Age
a Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter
=Jim Silva —Earle Rcbitaille
x Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth
a Charles Sylvia _Ronald Bates
DISTRICT NO. 6: x Ruthelyn PI varier, Chairman _Evelyn Hart
xroll Sansone, Chairman pro tem John C. Cox, Jr.
=Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A. Wollner, Chairman - Dick Sherrick
=Evelyn Hart, Chairman pro tam —Ruthelyn Plumper
x Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman Thames R. Saltarelli
=James A. Mahner, Chai man pro tem —Nate Reade
=Fred Barrera —_Gene Beyer
=John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn Plummer
a Robert Richardson —Miguel Pulldo
=Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
=Sally Anne Sheridan x Barry Hamnond
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Linda Moulton-Patterson
=Jack Kelly, Chairman pro two —Don MacAllister
=Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M. Gullixson, Chairman Henry M. Medea
=Fred Barrera, Chairman pro tell —6ene Beyer
=Glenn Parker —Burnie Dunlap
a Iry Pickier —Fred Hunter
=Don R. Roth =Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Peer A. Swan, Chairman Darryl Miller
Leslie A. Pontious, Chairman pro tan z Charles E. Puckett
=Fred Barrera —Gene Beyer
=Don R. Roth --Roger Stanton
=Sally Anne Sheridan x Barry Hammond
-2-
' 10/14/92
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager, 1 '
Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes, �a..✓
Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant
Board Secretary, Catherine Biele,
Corrine Clawson, Patti Gorczyca,
Ed Hodges, John Linder, Bob Ooten,
L. Ellen Ray, Lynn Redman,
Mary Simpson, Jack Vincent
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
Jamel Demir, Walt Howard, Bill Knopf,
John Shaw, Phil Stone
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman briefly commented
Report of the Joint Chairman on brochures included in the
Directors' meeting folders relative
to the increase in sewer service fees. He requested that Directors provide
copies of the brochures in their respective city halls to have available to
their constituents, informing then of the necessity of increasing sewer
service rates because of the recent confiscation of Districts' property
taxes by the Governor and State Legislature.
He also reported that a short video explaining the Sanitation Districts'
wastewater management program and why it was necessary to increase the
annual sewer service fees for 1992-93 is almost complete and should be
available for distribution soon.
Joint Chairman Mahoney then announced that the Fiscal Policy Committee was
scheduled to meet on Wednesday, October 21st, at 5:30 p.m.
He also reported that the Ad Hoc Committee for Service to Outside Areas was
scheduled to meet on Thursday, October 22nd, at 5:30 p.m.
Chairman Mahoney also called a meeting of the Executive Committee for
Wednesday, October 28th, at 5:30 p.m., and invited Directors Fred Barrera
and John Collins to attend.
He added that the Building Committee, originally scheduled to meet on
November 4th, was now changed to meet on Thursday, October 29th, at
5:30 p.m.
Joint Chairman Mahoney also reminded the Directors that next month's regular
meeting date of November 11th, at 7:30 p.m. had been rescheduled to
November 18th, at 7:30 p.m. due to the Veterans' Day holiday.
-3-
10/14/92
ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Sylvester reported that a report
Report of the General Manager had been received from the Orange
�...� County Treasurer-Tax Collector dated
September 1, 1992 on the investment of Districts' reserve funds. The total
interest earned on Districts' investments of the Districts' funds for fiscal
year 1991-92 was $20.7 million, a net yield of 8.72%.
The General Manager further reported that included in the Directors' meeting
folders was the final offering statement for the $98.5 million Series C
Certificates of Participation issue which was sold on September 1, 1992.
ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Sylvester explained that it is a
Presentation of mementos re tradition among underwriters to give
190-92 Series C COP issues mementos to key people involved in
securities issues like the Districts
recent Series C Certificates of Participation. He then had staff distribute
mementos from the underwriter, Merrill Lynch, to Directors on the Board
during the Series C debt issues.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 9,
1992, and the adjourned meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 9,
�✓ 1992. and the adjourned meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 9,
1992, and the adjourned meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 9,
1992, and the adjourned meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 9,
1992, and the adjourned meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or
• Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 9,
1992, and the adjourned meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman
1�/ ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
-4-
10/14/92
DISTRICT li There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 9,
1992, and the adjourned meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 9,
1992, and the special meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or
pproyal of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
regular meeting held September 9,
1992, and the special meeting held September 16, 1992, the Chairman
ordered that said minutes be deemed approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of Joint
and Individual District claims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages
"A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized
below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts
so indicated. tJ
9/09/92 9/23/92
ALL DISTRICTS
Joating Fund - E 622,250.11 E1,367,972.96
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 2,264,469.54 1,877,141.52
Joint Working Capital Fund - 113,813.08 139,015.32
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 4919759.53 119,701.16
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 575.28 43,616.49
DIST - 9,492.39 556,758.50
DISTRI - 28,354.35 35,756.81
D STR N . 5 - 57,918.26 261,193.03
DISTRICT NO. 6 - 26.94 182.39
DISTRICT NS.7 - 87,356.73 29,777.25
DI TRI—CT N7. 11 - 6,963.94 880.86
DISTRI T 1 - -0- 37.80
DI TRICT N . 14 - 8,425.66 164,857.73
DI TRI T 0 . 5 8 6 JOINT - -0- 4,710.51
DISTRICTS NOS. &_7 JOINT - 2,638.41 -0-
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 8 14 JOINT - 27.10 6 258.93
TT 4, 1.3 $4,607,'861.26
-5-
10/14192
ALL DISTRICTS
Act ons re central Laboratory, Job
No. J-17
Approving Change Order No. 13 to Moved, seconded and duly carried:
the plans and specifications for
Job No. J-17 That Change Order No. 13 to the
plans and specifications for said
project, authorizing a net addition of $51,362.52 to the contract with
J. R. Roberts Corporation for six items of added or deleted work, and
granting a time extension of 40 calendar days for completion of said
additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
Accepting Job No. J-17 as complete Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-1-37,
accepting Central Laboratory, Job No. J-17 as complete, authorizing
execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part
of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 14 to
the plans and specifications for That Change Order No. 14 to the plans
Job No. J-19-1 and specifications for Central Power
Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job
No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of $91,002.00 to the contract with
Hunter Corporation for seven items of additional work, be, and is hereby,
�... approved.
Approving Change Order No. 8 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
lans and specifications for Job
No. - -1 That Change Order No. 8 to the plans
and specifications for Control
Center/Operations and Maintenance Building, Job No. J-23-1, authorizing an
addition of $21,017.00 to the contract with J. R. Roberts Corporation for
one item of additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions relative to Pum tation
Telemetry and Monitoring 3ystem.
Job No. J-28
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
plans and specifications for Job
No. J-28 That Addendum No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Pump
Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28, changing the
date for receipt of bids from June 9, 1992 to July 7, 1992, be, and is
hereby, approved.
... -6-
10/14/92
A rovin Addendum No. 2 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Mans and s ecifications for Job
No. J-ZIJ That Addendum No. 2 to the plans
and specifications for Pump
Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28, changing the
date for receipt of bids from July 7, 1992 to August 4, 1992, be, and
is hereby, approved.
Appr2V ing Addendum No. 3 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ans and s ecif tattoos for Job
No. J-ZU That Addendum No. 3 t'o the plans
and specifications for Pump
Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28, deleting three
pump stations; revising requirements; and making miscellaneous
technical modifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Addendum No. 4 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
lens and specifications for Job
Na. -J That Addendum No. 4 to the plans
and specifications for Pump
Station Telemetry and Monitoring System, Job No. J-28, deleting one
pump station and making miscellaneous technical modifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
Rejecting all bids for Job No. J-28 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
due
�tware ced spot
That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-138, receiving and filing bid tabulation
and recommendation, rejecting all bids for Pump Station Telemetry and
Monitoring System, Job No. J-28, due to software license dispute; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That Districts' staff and Counsel be, and is hereby,
directed to reformulate and rebid the job following resolution of the
software licensing issue. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
eiveo ileea ro wr1tFe—n—
ri
or ,fh Fp
iscaPolict That the written report of the Fiscal ,
ommittee and Executive committee Policy Committee and Executive
Committee meetings held on
September 23, 1992, be and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
�..�
-7-
10/14/92
DISTRICTS 1. ✓ Actions er a2n i3 o e6 a e8m e1n of
consulting finance team members for
Refunding Certificates of
Participation, 1992 Series
8,,r2MIE2 Letter A reement with Moved, seconded and duly carried:
PaineWebber for untle rwri ing
services That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution
No. 92-144, approving Letter Agreement with PaineWebber, dated June 30,
1992, for underwriting services, for an amount not to exceed $8.50 per
$1,000 certificate, for a fixed-rate restructuring, or $3.50 per $1,000
certificate for a synthetic fixed-rate restructuring, and rescinding
Resolution No. 92-90. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
A rovin Letter A reement with Moved, seconded and duly carried:
utl a Rose u hrie Alexander and
erdon for special Co-Bond Counsel That the Boards of Directors
services hereby adopt Resolution
No. 92-145, approving Letter
Agreement with Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander and Ferdon, dated June 18,
1992, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, based on per diem rates,
for an amount not to exceed $80,000.00 for a fixed-rate issue, plus an
�✓ amount not to exceed $30,000.00 for the additional synthetic fixed-rate
work, plus expenses, and rescinding Resolution No. 92-91. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
A rovin Memorandum A reement with Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Rour e 8 Woo ruf fors ec al
Co-Bond Counsel services That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution
No. 92-146, approving Memorandum Agreement with Rourke 8 Woodruff,
dated June 30, 1992, for special Co-Bond Counsel services, for a
maximum fee not to exceed $15,000.00, and rescinding Resolution
No. 92-92. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part
of these minutes.
Authorizin the en a Let of Moved, seconded and duly carried:
rrick Herrin ton as un erwr ters
counsel That the engagement of Orrick
Herrington as underwriters'
counsel , and providing for the cost of said services to be included in
the cost of issuance paid to PaineWebber, and rescinding Minute Order
of July 8, 1992, be, and is hereby, approved.
-8-
10/14/92
DISTRICTS 1 2 3 5, 6 7 8 11 -
Actions re RefundingCertificates
ot Participation, 1 er es
Approving Refunding Certificates Moved, seconded and duly carried
of Participation, 1Serf
er es by each respective District:
That its Board of Directors hereby adopts the following resolution ,
approving Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series,
pursuant to the Boards' adopted long-range financial plan:
DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. COP MAXIMUM AMOUNT
1 92-147-1 $29,500,000
2 92-148-2 63,500,000
3 92-149-3 59,500,000
5 92-150-5 7,000,000
6 92-151-6 2,2509000
7 92-152-7 5,500,000
11 92-153-11 2,750,000
Said resolutions authorize issuance of Certificates of Participation by
each respective District in the principal amounts indicated above and
aggregate principal amount not to exceed $170,000,000; and:
- Approve and authorize printing and distribution
of the Preliminary and Final Official Statement
(informs potential investors about terms) -
- Authorize payment to the credit rating agencies,
Standard and Poor's and Moody's (estimated amount
$30,000.00 each)
- Authorize completion of the following legal
documents:
*Acquisition Agreement.......Details each District's
participation and
projects
°Assignment Agreement........Allows Trustee to pay
investors
*Trust Agreement.............Instructions for
Trustee Bank
°Escrow Agreement............Sets forth the duties
and responsibilities of ,
the escrow agent
*Certificate Purchase
Agreement...................Sets forth terms and
conditions of sale
between Districts and
underwriter PaineWebber
-9-
10/14/92
a Interest Rate SWAP
Agreement...................Sets forth terms and
conditions of interest
between Districts and
counterparty
°Liquidity Guarantee
Agreement...................Guarantees a liquidity
facility at 25 basis
points annual fee
*Guarantee of American
International Group, Inc....Guarantees performance
on SWAP agreement
*Offering Statement..........Informs potential
investors about the
terms and conditions of
the financing
a Standby Bond Purchase
Agreement...................Sets forth the terms
and conditions of the
liquidity facility
*Remarketing Agreement.......Sets forth the duties
and responsibility of
the remarketing agent
- Authorize execution and delivery of synthetic fixed
rate advance refunding COPS, subsequent to the
negotiation process, with final terms to be
determined by finance team, but not to exceed
$170 million and a term of 25 years
- Authorize underwriter's (PaineWebber) fees not to
exceed $3.50/$1,000 certificate for synthetic fixed
rate transaction
- Authorize selection of State Street Bank and Trust
Company as Trustee Bank (estimated gross fee over
21-year life of Issue is $70,000.00)
- Select KPMG Peat Marwick as verification agent
(one-time fee is $3,500.00)
' - Authorize selection of AMBAC as municipal bond
insurer (fee is 27 basis points)
- Approve Master Interest Exchange (SWAPS) and approve
liquidity facility with American International
Group, Inc.
-10-
10/14/92
- Approve a Mutual Benefit Advances Agreement,
sometimes referred to as a "Cross-Collaterilization
Agreement", between the participating Districts
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these
minutes.
Authorizin finance team to Moved, seconded and duly carried:
determine and im lemen the best
combination of financ n a erna- That the finance team be, and is
tives to obtain the most favorable hereby, authorized to determine
overall terms and conditions for and implement the best
he Refundinq Certificates of combination of the debt financing
Participation, 1 92 beries alternatives to obtain the most
favorable overall terms and
conditions for the Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992
Series, based on the market conditions during the transaction time
frame; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That each District Chairman or Chairman pro tem, Board
Secretary, General Manager, Director of Finance, General Counsel and
any other duly-constituted officer or agent be, and are hereby,
authorized to execute any and all documents necessary and advisable to
effectuate the transactions.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file an a rove written
report of he Fiscal Po cy That the written report of the Fiscal
Committee Policy Committee meeting held on �..�
September 28, 1992, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICTS 1 2 3, 5 6 7 8 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratif in al ton of scal Polic
Committee in directing staff o That the action of the Fiscal Policy
negotiate a reversal of the Committee in directing staff to
existin three- ear WAP relative - negotiate a reversal of the existing
to the 1990-1992 Ca Ital three-year SWAP relative to the
Improvement Program, Series .Is 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program,
Issue Series B COP Issue, when deemed
appropriate by staff and the financing
team, subject to the concurrence of the Chairman of the Fiscal Policy
Committee and the Joint Chairman, be, and is hereby, ratified.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
anging the regular November 11,
1992 meetin of the oint oards to That the regular Joint Board meeting
November la, 19VZ date of November 11, 1992, be, and is _
hereby, changed to Wednesday,
November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. due to the Veterans' Day holiday.
-11-
10/14/92
ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the
eneral Counsel 's Comments Prior to Directors of the need for a closed
Closed ess ion session as authorized by Government
Code Section 54956.9 to review:
1) Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the
manufacturer and general contractor on Districts' two jobs relating to
the co-generation internal combustion engines.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Convene in closed session oursuant
o Government ode bection The Boards convened in closed session
54956.9 at 8:03 p.m. pursuant to Govenment
Code Section 54956.9. Confidential
Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors have been
prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.2 and
are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of Confidential
Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings.
ALL DISTRICTS At 8:45 p.m. the Boards reconvened 7n
Reconvene in regular session regular session.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to Wednesday,
November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:45 p.m., October 14, 1992.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned to Wednesday,
November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:45 p.m., October 14, 1992.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned to Wednesday,
November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:45 p.m., October 14, 1992.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to Wednesday,
November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:45 p.m., October 14, 1992.
..✓ -12-
10/14/92
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried: 1 J
Adjournment �..✓
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned to Wednesday,
November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:45 p.m. , October 14, 1992.
DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned to Wednesday,
November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:45 p.m. , October 14, 1992.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Chan,
an a Order No. 5 to the
l ans and s ecif cations for That Change Order No. 5 to the plans
ontract No. 5-34-3 and specifications for Improvements
to Bayside Drive Trunk Sewer,
Phase 3, Contract No. 5-34-3, authorizing an addition of $303,271.00 to the
contract with Silveri 8 LeBouef for 12 items of additional work, be, and is
hereby, approved.
DISTRICTS 5 8 6
Actions re Improvements to Bitter
Point and Rocky oint Pum
t ,ations ontract No. 5-32. and
Im on rovements to BayBridge Pum `...�
Stati , ontract No. 5-3.3 staff report The Director of Engineering
reported that Improvements to
Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract No. 5-32, and
Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract No. 5-33, would be
upgrading and modernizing three older pump stations in Newport Beach
along Pacific Coast Highway. Each pump station will receive major
electrical upgrades and other work, but the Bay Bridge Pump Station,
which was completed 1n 1966, would receive major mechanical , seismic
and architectural upgrades as well.
Mr. Dawes advised that six bids had been received, and he recommended
approval of Addendum No. 1 and awarding the contract to the corrected
low bidder, Uhler, Inc. , in the amount of $1,765,757.00.
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ions and s ecifications for
Contract Nos. -32 and -33 That Addendum No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for
Improvements to Bitter Point and Rocky Point Pump Stations, Contract
No. 5-32, and Improvements to Bay Bridge Pump Station, Contract
No. 5-33, making miscellaneous technical clarifications and
modifications, be, and is hereby, approved. l
-13-
10/14/92
Awarding Contract Nos. 5-32 and Moved, seconded and duly carried:
5-3T
That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-14D, receiving and filing bid tabulation
and recommendation and awarding contract for said project to Uhler,
Inc. , in the total corrected amount of $1,765,757.00. Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
A journment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned to Wednesday,
November 18, 1992 at 7:3D p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:45 p.m. , October 14, 1992.
DISTRICT 5
Actions re South Coast Trunk Sewer
Phase 2, contract No. - 5-
Verbal staff report The Director of Engineering
reported that in March 1988,
District 5 entered into a financing and construction agreement with
Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) which provided for funding of the
South Coast Trunk Sewer by IRWD. The South Coast Trunk Sewer will
serve the new downcoast development by The Irvine Company located south
of Corona del Mar. During 1989 it became apparent that the South Coast
Trunk Sewer would be split into two phases. Phase 1, approximately
4,700 feet of sewer between the southerly city limit and a point south
of Newport Coast Drive, was completed in January 1991. Phase 2 will
begin south of Newport Coast Drive to a point south of Crystal Cove.
Because the South Coast Trunk Sewer takes the same alignment of Pacific
Coast Highway and because the realignment and widening of Pacific Coast
Highway through the Crystal Cove area was delayed by new highway
alignment, Phase 2 was also delayed.
Mr. Dawes further reported that this contract was originally planned to
be included in a larger County of Orange construction project for
improvements to Pacific Coast Highway as a separate bid item. However,
when bids were received, the bid item for the District 5 work was much
higher than anticipated. Therefore, he stated, staff notified the
County to have this contract deleted from their project and the
District will now bid Contract No. 5-35-2 separately, and noted that
some additional work on the plans and specifications would be necessary
to accomplish this. The funding for this work would be in accordance
with the 1988 agreement with IRWD which provides for IRWD reimbursement
of construction costs after project completion.
He then recommended approval of the plans and specifications and
authorization for the General Manager. to establish the bid date for
this contract.
-14-
10/14/92
Approving plans an tl specifications Moved, seconded and duly carried:
for Contract No. 5-35-2
That the Board of Directors
hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-139-5, approving plans and
specifications for South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, Contract
No. 5-35-2, and authorizing the General Manager to establish the date
for receipt of bids. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to Wednesday,
November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:45 p.m. , October 14, 1992.
DISTRICT 7
Actions re Relocation of Michelson
Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2
Approving Change Order No. 3 to the Moved, seconded and duty carried:
plans and specifications for
Contract No. 7-11-2 That Change Order No. 3 to the
plans and specifications for said
project, authorizing an addition of $73,000.00 to the contract with
Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. for one item of additional work, �...�
be, and is hereby, approved.
Accepting Contract No. 7-11-2 as Moved, seconded and duly carried:
complete
That the Board of Directors
hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-141-7, accepting Relocation of
Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2, as complete, authorizing
execution of a Notice of Completion and approving Final Closeout
Agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part
of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding contract for Abandonment
of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, That the Board of Directors hereby
Contract No. 7-14-1-1, % Silveri adopts Resolution No. 92-142-7,
8 LeBouef, JV receiving and filing bid tabulation
and recommendation and awarding
contract for Abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station, Phase 1, Contract
No. 7-14-1-1, to Silveri 8 LeBouef, JV, in the total amount of $90,732.00.
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
-15-
10/14192
DISTRICT 7
Actions re adoption of Resolution
�.,.� of Necessity to acquire Easement
b ondemnation for Abandonment of
Overhi ll Pum
tat on Phase 1,
Contract No. 7-1 - -1
Verbal report of staff and General The Director of Engineering
Counsel reported that for several years
actions have been taken by the
District to allow for the abandonment of ten pump stations on the east
side of Tustin Hills. These pump stations currently pump wastewater
westerly over the hills, but would otherwise drain easterly towards
Peters Canyon Wash and the Irvine Ranch Water District's (IRWD)
recently constructed Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer (HATS) , currently in
District No. 14 and IRWD.
He further reported that in December 1991 the Directors approved a
reimbursement agreement with IRWD for construction of two sewer
laterals to HATS along with IRWD's construction of certain reaches of
HATS through Peters Canyon Wash. These two laterals are for future
gravity sewer connections to allow the abandonment of the Bent Tree and
Overhill Pump Stations.
Mr. Dawes also stated that in June 1992, the Directors approved another
agreement with IRWD for District 7 to purchase 3.92 MGD of capacity in
the HATS to accommodate flows redirected by the future abandonment of
District 7 pump stations. Once the latest reach of HATS is completed
and the additional infrastructure is built to allow District 7 to
physically make the connections, it will be possible to abandon most of
the District 7 pump stations. The Irvine Company has already granted
to District 7 one permanent easement for the Bent Tree lateral and
another for the Overhill Pump Station. However, a second easement is
necessary for abandonment of Overhill Pump Station over a portion of
Lot A of Tract No. 5369 which appears to be owned by Trailside Homes, a
Joint Venture. This Lot A is a common lot, not developable.
Trailside Homes granted an irrevocable offer to dedicate Lot A to the
County of Orange in 1979 for park purposes but the offer was never
accepted. Trailside Homes may still be the owner. However, property
taxes have not been paid and the firm may no longer exist. The former
partners of the Trailside Homes joint venture, Cameo Homes and Lucas
Development, deny that Trailside Homes exists and will not individually
or collectively grant to District 7 the required easement. The
Districts have offered to purchase the easement at fair market value of
approximately $2,500.00 which is much less than taxes owning on the
parcel of approximately $15,000.00. Mr. Dawes stated, therefore, that
it was necessary to proceed with eminent domain proceedings.
The Assistant General Counsel , John Shaw, then explained eminent domain
• procedures to acquire the easement.
-16-
10/14/92
Hearing The Chairman announced that this
was the time and place fixed by �..�
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 for a
hearing relative to adoption of a Resolution of Necessity to acquire an
Easement by Condemnation pertaining to Abandonment of Overhill Pump
Station, Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-9-1.
Open hearing The Chairman declared the
hearing open at 8:00 p.m.
Close hearing The Chairman closed the
hearing at 8:01 p.m.
Ado tin Resolution of Necessit re Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ac uis ion of Easement b
condemnation That the Board of Directors
hereby adopts Resolution
No. 92-143-7, adopting a Resolution of Necessity to acquire an Easement
by Condemnation pertaining to Abandonment of Overhill Pump Station,
Phase 1, Contract No. 7-14-9-1. Said resolution, by reference hereto,
is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to Wednesday,
November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 8:45 p.m., October 14, 1992.
Assistant Secr ry the Boards
of Directors o Coun o Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11,
13 and 14
...
-17-
FUND NO 9199 JT GIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/03/92 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCURTY SANITATICN DISTRICTS OF CRANCE COUNTY
CLAIMS FAID U9/4'9/92 POSTING 007E 09/09/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
124453 ACCU-LAES RESEARCH INC 9320.u0 LAB SERVICES
124494 ACVARCC C(NSIRUCIOPS INC $582.597.00 CONSTRUCTION P1-34-3, P2-35-2
124495 AIR PNCCLCTS L CHEMICAL IN 116.BIS.Ci OAN AGREEMENT CRY. GEN SYST. M.O.8-9-89
124496 AMER ASSOC OF ENGINEERING ETC 3239.00 PUBLICATIONS
124497 AMERICAN CABLING 3 COMM $254.81 COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIES
324458 RCRCC INC 1/CO APERICAN SEALS 1446.75 HARDWARE
124454 AFERICAN TYPE CLLIUP.E COLLECT6 SIOO.VU LAB SUPPLIES
124506 OLAME P ANOLRSCN $144.96 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
124501 ANINTEP . DISTRIBUTION 3759.15 ELECTRICAL PARTS
124502 APCO VALVE L FPIPER COPP 59.094.6R FITTINGS
1245C3 A-PLLS SISTEPS 12.558.72 ADVERTISING
1245L4 ABATEM SERVICES INC 37.460.91 UNIFORM RENTALS
I24505 ASSOC. ADMINIS. L CONSULTANTS 1765.VC MEDICAL CLAIMS ADMINISTRATOR
124506 AUTO SMOF EQUIPMENT CO 31P110•IB PARTS MASHER
124507 RMM LARCf ILL 55.722.5E RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
1245C0 ERA SAFETY L SLPPLY 5708.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES
C77 125509 BANANA BLLEPRINT 3511.29 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES
X 124510 BATTERY SPECIALTIES 599R.84 BATTERIES
= 124!I1 BANTER CIAGNCSTICS INC $10,241.73 LAB SUPPLIES
124512 J L H FERGE INC 362.39 LAB SUPPLIES
CD 124513 PIC IECP FI 7. INC $42.92 SERVICE AGREEMENT
124514 BOLEN RADIATOR SERVICE $211.28 TRUCK REPAIRS
224515 BOOT BARN $140.42 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
n 124516 RPEN6ER-FIEOLEN L ASSOC IN $199.26 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
I 124517 BRCWA 3 CALCUELL CONSLLIING $83.950.55 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19, J-I1-1
�-' 124518 SUILOEP-S EMPGRIUM _ 5290.15 HARDWARE
124529 BURKE ENGINEERING CO S1.069.26 MOTORS
124520 GARY F $TREED 32.390.16 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
124521 C P 1 3949.90 ELECTRIC PARTS
124522 CALTRCL INC $728.27 INSTRUMENT PARTS
124523 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE CO 5310.OJ SEMINAR REGISTRATION
124524 JOHN CAROLED ENGINEERS $155.228.31 ENGINEERING SERVICES P1-34, PI-36, PI-20
124!25 CENTLRY SAFELY EAST L SLFP 31.760.23 SAFETY SUPPLIES
121526 CNEVRCN LSA INC 33024.38 OIL 6 GREASE
124527 CHILTCN BOCK CO $1T7.79 PUBLICATION
124528 COLE-PARMER INSTRUMENT CO $5.156.00 LAB EQUIPMENT
124529 COLICH AND SONS 383.166.30 CONSTRUCTION 7-3E-2
124530 CCPPLTER BAY $829.60 LAB SUPPLIES
124511 CCPPLSA. IPC• 33.607.01 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE
1245-2 CC6NELL FP FARIS / DIV $60.64 TRUCK PARTS
129533 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST $4.675.30 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
124534 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC SI.205.07 TOOLS
124535 CCNVEPSE CCNSULTANTS 0 C 310.104.82 ENGINEERING SERVICES I-9
124E-6 CCCPIP INELSTRIES INC $1,109.31 COMPUTER PARTS
1245.7 C(L611 6XILESALE ELECTRIC $1.574.34 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
12,536 CREATIVE SCREEN ARTS 3376.78 SAFETY SUPPLIES
FUND NC 9199 • JI FIST YCRNINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/03/92 F06L 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CEUN77 SANI7A7ICN DISTRICTS OF GRANCE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID WJ9/92 POSTING DATE u9/09/92
WARRANT NO. VFNOOA AMOUNT DESCPIPIION
124539 CPCSPE S CEERICN INC. 5300.0R VACUUM TRUCE SERVICES
129544 CHtPLES F CPCWLET CO SM9.58 PUMP PARTS
124541 J.L. O-ANGELO CO INC 31.U69.98 PIPE
12150E DANIELS TIRE SERVICE a653.1N TIRES
124543 DATA STOOP 576.O0 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
124S4/ DE ARIA CORFCRATIOA $3,349.87 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
124545 DIALOG INFGRPATICN SERVICES $39.97 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
124546 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL 55.667.9E CHEMICALS
129547 DIGITAL EGUIFPERT COOP $2.000.9N OFFICE EQUIPMENT
124548 CCRACC EATERPRISES INC $13.65J.11 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
120E49 CURN EC61ROS CCRP 5212.2E PAINT SUPPLIES
124550 DYNEX 12.724.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124551 E.C.9. S6B2.UC PUBLICATION
129552 CIP CO/APS SUFFLY 3521.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124553 EASTPAN INC S1.454.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES
121554 ESENHARC EQUIFMERT- $52.24 TRUCE PARTS
fT7 124555 EOUC6TIONAL DEVELOPMENT SPEC 58.50O.Ou ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CONTRIBUTION
X 124556 ENCHANTER INC 34.400.03 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91
2 1245E7 FALCCN CIEFCIAL SFPVTCE 53.38J.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
124558 JCHN P FALKENSTEIN AE S3.42J.G0 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16
124559 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP $955.00 AIR FREIGHT
224560 FERRELLGAS SLTB.61 PROPANE
124561 CHEMVEST INC $83.98 FREIGHT
a 124"2 FTLTERLIRE CORP $96.33 FILTERS
N 12A563 FILTER SLPFLIY CC SI.367.U3 FILTERINSURANCE
124564 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INFURA 59JO.00
124565 FI SC HER R PORTER CO 56.796.E0 CHLORINATION PARTS
1245E6 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 31.094.49 LAB SUPPLIES
124SE7 FISGAS IRSTRUMTRiS $999.38 LAB EQUIPMENT
1295EB FLAP/ SCIENTIFIC. INC. $495.30 LAB SUPPLIES
12A569 FELAINEh VALLEY CAPFPA $225.u1 FILM
124570 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES $200.34 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124572 THE FOARERO CD $1.852.19 INSTRUMENT PARTS
124572 FRAZEE PAINT G VALLCOVER166 $94.73 PAINT SUPPLIES
124573 CITY CF FLLLERTCN $5.50 WATER USE
12457♦ GST. INC. 55.130.12 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
129575 GA6AHL LUMBER CO S476.54 HARDWARE/LUMBER
12057E GENCPAL IELEPHONE CO $239.09 TELEPHONE SERVICES
124577 CLCO6L CCPFUTFR SUFPLIES 5190.89 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
124578 6W GRAINGER INC 5506.61 OFFICE SUPPLIES
124579 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS 52.91S.62 PHOTO SUPPLIES
1245EC RCN GPEEN R ASSOCIATES 515.303.P0 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-11-92
124501 DAVIC P. CPIFFIN 53.500.00 LEGAL SERVICES M.0.12-I1-91
1245E2 ARTHLR C ELY III ASSCC. 52.001.98 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
124503 HSL TECHNOLOGY $388.996.84 CONSTRUCTION J-23-2, P2-E9
124584 HACH COMPANY $72.U0 LAB SUPPLIES
C
FUND NC 5199 Jl GIST 6EAHIAL CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE ^/O3/92 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AF95
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNT?
CLAIMS FAIO 09/09/92 POSTING DATE 09/09/92
UARRAN'7 KC. VEKCCP AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
120SB5 HAPPINGIDN INDUSTRIAL ILASTI 3TS1.50 GAUGE
124566 HAULAWAY CONTAINENS $4.660.OJ TRASH REMOVAL SERVICES
1245B7 PL F&VN CO INC $565.90 FILTERS
1245PA HILTI INC 9154.19 CONCRETE
120565 MCBARI CCFF 21.831.8E LAB SUPPLIES
124590 RC HGFFFAK AAD/CR ISCC $1.267.14 LAB SUPPLIES
120591 HORIBA $5.247.43 ELECTRIC PARTS
124592 J.1. HORVATH E ASSOC. 53.000.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-07
124593 AS HL'GHES CC INC 1651.63 PAINT SUPPLIES
1245S4 HUNTER CCFFCRATICN 182A.119.50 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1
124595 CI7Y OF HUNTINGTON BEACH 523.157.UC WATER USE
224596 HUNTINGTON BEACH RUBBER SIA A19.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES
121597 HUNTINGIOK VALLEY SCHNINN C 5161.36 BICYCLE PARTS
1295SB HYCMACOK CCPPANV $716.62 LAB SUPPLIES
129559 IPPFRI&L VEST CHEMICAL 940.190.68 FERRIC CHLORIDE H.0.11-19-90
128600 INDUSTRIAL THREADED PRODUCTS $520.57 CONNECTORS
m 121601 INGRAM PAFER 5933.55 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
X 124602 INTERPOLKIAIN SCIENTIFIC COPF 52.329.97 LAB SUPPLIES
Z 124603 /R7EPSIATE FATIERY SYSTFPS SB21.N'_ BATTERIES
124604 GRLAI NESTER& SANITARY SUIT $516.98 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124605 JAI-S CATERING 5867.19 DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES
-
--1 124606 JIM.S SUSPENSION SERVICE S25.U0 TRUCE REPAIRS
n 124607 JCHNSIOAE SLFFLV 5868.01 ELECTRIC PARTS
1246CO JCNFS CPIPICALS INC 52.091.9E CHEMICALS
W 129EL9 JCPCAK ECIIRCLE INC S298.113 INSTRUMENT PARTS
12061. KA&CIER TRSULATICR INC $610.61 INSULATION INSTALLATION
124611 KEENAN L ASSOCIATES S2.475.00 SAFETY SUPPLIES
124612 KING BEARING INC 5395.81 MACHINE SUPPLIES
124613 KRCY INDUS7RIAL SUFFLIES 52.713.90 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
124614 PARTIN CERDICK SP $1.599.70 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
124615 LAFALE $75.03 MEMBERSHIP FEES
124616 LA CELLOLAM IELEFFONE CC 5093.17 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
124617 LA MOTTO CHEMICAL PRODUCTS - $99.90 CHEMICALS
124618 LANTPCNIY S242.0♦ OFFICE EQUIPMENT
124619 LAUR PARK ENTERPRISE S4.267.98 TRUCE PARTS
124620 LIEREPI CERFCPAl1OK 520.130.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
124622 LIMI TER6UE CORP 59.577.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124622 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT S459.000.00 COOP AGREE - MONTROSE CHEMICAL
124623 PAC AFPLIED FNVIKOKMENIAL 5933.33 LAB SERVICES
124624 SL'SAR MLRCCTT $236.30 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL
124625 HIS 5510.79 FACTO SERVICES
124626 MAIAIENAACE PROCUCTS INC 52.921.82 MECHANICAL PARTS
124627 MA&L1C MOTORS SISO.G0 TOWING SERVICES
124620 MARTEN $419.24 GROUNOSKEEPING SUPPLIES
124629 M6PVAC ELECTRONICS S7.711 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124630 PA17 - IHLGR INC 51.956.51 CHLORINATION PARTS
FUND NC 9199 - JT GIST 6(PKIKG CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/03192 FADE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP43
C(UR1Y ZAN17ATICN DISTRICTS OF CRAAGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 49/79/92 POSTING DATE 19139192
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
124631 MCBAIA IKSTRLMENTS 5995.NC SERVICE AGREEMENT
1246-2 EICN( PCTICK 52/9.17 INSTRUMENT PARTS
124633 NICROAGE COMPUTER $2.277.63 LAB SUPPLIES
121631 MICROAGC OF CERRITOS 3687.75 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
121615 MICRCPICS CCRPOPATICN 913.398.u5 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
12/636 PILLIRORICS 33.995.10 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
1246-7 FI3CC S6.875.75 MECHANICAL PARTS
129f38 MITCHELL INTERNATIONAL INC $179.95 PUBLICATION
12/639 PONTGONERY LABORATORIES 910.833.75 LAB SERVICES
121640 MCTICK INDUSTRIES INC $1.852.9/ MECHANICAL PARTS
12/6/1 CITY OF AEYP(R7 PEACH $28.22 WATER USE
121642 CCCLPAIICPPL V151CR SERVICES S473.01 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY GLASSES
121613 GX SVSIEFS CO 127.867.71 CHLORINE M.O.1O-9-91
124644 ORANGE COUNTY CHENICAL CO $659.83 CHEMICALS
124645 ORANGE VALVE C FITTING CO. f1.559.97 FITTINGS
191646 GXVGEA SERVICE $557.95 SPECIALTY GASSES
12/617 CCLNIV SARIIATI(K CISTRICI 5915.20 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
rn 121648 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO 1295.6E SAFETY SUPPLIES
Z
121619 PACIFIC DELL f1 .61 TELEPHONE SERVICES
12/6!1 PETEL PEPIDIPN SYSTEMS 3395 3395.6E TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
W 121651 PEAT PAP4ICN FAIR i [C $10.900.00 AUDITING SERVICES M.O.3-13-91
12/653 FICXLICX PAPER .662.40 OFFICE CONSTRUCTIONES
RETENTION 5-34-3
124654 PICKECR BARE 159193.1U
1 124655 PLTYINS BOYES 3$44.06 HARDWARE
MACHINE LEASE
121655 PLAINS ICS.TRUEVALUE HARDWARE f1A.08 EQUIPMEB
D 12165E PCLYFETNIC S. IN[. .039.O8 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
12/657 OWE RUBE INC f2/$186.03 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.3-11-92
12965E POWER ONE LINEAR PP OD UCT f186.40 INSTRUMENT PARTS
124659 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICE $518.00 ICE
1246E0 PRCFESSICNAL TREE CARE 31.903.00 LANDSCAPING SERVICES
124663 THE FRDCECI SCLUTIONS CO. $2.360.110 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.O.7-17-91
124662 QUEST IRTERNAIICAAL INC $938.75 INSTRUMENT
124663 AND ENGINEERING/P.ILLTPONICS 11.113.75 TRANSDUCER
1246E1 PAINPCV OISPCSAL CC f1.430.69 TRASH REMOVAL
124GE5 RECYC IRE 946.904.12 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.3-13-91'
121666 NEC LIRE SMES $219.98 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
12/667 PLH4TE METER RESETTING SYST f5.400.Ou POSTAGE
12166E MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY $3.930.67 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
1246E9 J R PCRERIS $01.143.37 CONSTRUCTION J-17
12/670 RIVAL TRLCN BCCY $376.71 TRUCK PARTS
12/671 AYAA-PERC( $1,786.67 PUMP PARTS
129672 JO BE NI 1 PYERSCK i SIR IN 5646.53 STEEL
120673 SANCON ENGINEERING INC $1.325.CO ENGINEERING SERVICES
12/679 SARTA FE IRCUSTRIAL PLASTICS $105.36 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124675 SCIEACE FFFLICAIICRS IAT-L $137.693.55 OCEAN MONITORING H.O.6-12-91
124676 SEA COAST DESISKS 527.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES
FURS NO 9199 JT OIST WCPKIKG CAPITAL PPOCESSIKG CATE 9/03192 PAGE 5
R EPORI NUMBER AP53
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/09/92 POSTING DATE 09/09/92
WARRANT NO. VEKCGR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
125677 SEARS ROEBUCK L CO $957.19 LAB EQUIPMENT
125676 SEAVENTURES L1.125.JO LAB SERVICES
125679 SECURITY SFECIALISTS f2.159.32- SECURITY SYSTEM PARTS
325620 SENCERE f2.095.05 ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT
125681 SHAMROCK SUFFLY $92.02 SAFETY SUPPLIES
125682 SHERWOOD MEDICAL CO f1.99T.P.6 LAB SUPPLIES
125EP3 SPURELUCK SALES $2.955.3A TOOLS
1256E5 SIEVERS IKSTPLPEKTATICN $255.50 LAB SUPPLIES
125685 SIGMA CNEPICAL CO f1.578.55 LAB SUPPLIES
12,686 SILVERI 6 LE UOUEF $53,961.61) CONSTRUCTION 5-35-3
125667 SMITH-EMERY CO 2200.00 SOIL TESTING M.O.7-17-91
125622 SPITE FIFE L SUPPLY INC $674.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
125FP9 SC CCAS7 AIR CLALITY $292.50 PERMIT FEES/TMINING REGISTRATION
125k50 SCL7PEKK CALIF ECIECK CC f55.730.42 POWER
125691 SC CAL GAS CC $6.831.65 NATURAL GAS
125692 SPLCIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC 5502.61 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
ITT 125693 SPECIALIZED PRODUCTS CO $290.87 ELECTRIC PARTS
X 124694 SPEC TECH INC $190.39 MELDING SUPPLIES
= 125655 SPIN 1KELSTRIES INC 5989.68 LAB SUPPLIES
1256SE STFRLINC ART $01.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES
125697 SUPNIT STEEL f2.505.52 METAL
-1 125G9B SUNSET FORD f135.35 TRUCE PARTS
125699 I P F I C $250.00 PUBLICATION
n 1247C0 /AVLCR-DUNK VFG COP'GANI f303.19 TRUCE PARTS
1 TPE 7AILCR SANC CC 1127.31 SAND
247,;1 CH
POLEF f825.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES
125703 TFLE-CELL. INC 153.95 TELEPHONE PARTS
12.T05 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 520.53 HARDWARE
12570E THGFPSOK FLBLISMING GRCUF 1206.09 PUBLICATION
12570E TCKY.S LICK 8 SAFE SERVICE $36.31 INSTRUMENT PART
12570 TRAVEL IFAVEL 23.571.90 TRAVEL SERVICES
12.7G8 TRUCK A AUTO SUPPLY INC $877.55 TRUCK PARTS
125709 JG TUCKER L SON INC 5397.33 INSTRUMENT PARTS
125710 TUSTIN DODGE SSR.02 TRUCK PARTS
125711 TWINING LABORATCRIES OF 95,320.59 SOIL TESTING
125712 URIIEO PARCEL SERVICE f150.31 PARCEL SERVICES
125713 UK RE[ STATES ELEVAICR LOOP f6R6.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
125714 VWP SCIENTIFIC 56.790.2P LAB SUPPLIES
125715 VAL1N CORPORATION 62T9.65 FILTER
12571E VALLEY CITIES SVFFLY CO 58.627.99 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
125717 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTNUPEKTS 119.914.17 LAB SUPPLIES
125718 WESTERN STATES CFERICAL SUPT'LY $34.299.61 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-8-90
125719 WESTIN ENGINEERING 1655.01. ENGINEERING SERVICES
125120 WESTNUX INTERNATIONAL 157.88 TRUCK PARTS
125721 WESCC $653.63 ELECTRIC PARTS
124722 WHITNEY PACNINERV INC f111.96 TRUCK PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9103/97 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS FAIR 05/.9/92 POSTING 061E P9/69/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
12472! RGURKE L LOOCPUFF L CA S68.256.36 LEGAL SERVICES M.O.2-19-92
124724 PEADY CCFF $8.888.12 COPIER LEASES
124725 GECRGE YARDLEY CC 1256.98 LAB SUPPLIES
124726 ZIEBARTN S ALPER/C.S. ALPER 902.254.G0 CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1
---------------
TCTAL CLAIMS PAIC 09/09/92 S3.694.e71.32
SUMNARY AMOUNT
X1 OPER FUND $65.28
XI CAP FAC FUND $510.00
fTl X2 OPER FUND $2,892.39
X 02 CAP FAC FUND $6,600.00
S X3 OPOR FUND $24,854.35
03 CAP FAC FUND $3,500.00
trJ X! OPER FUND $1,294.26
05 CAP FAC FUND $56,624.00
X6 OPER FUND $26.94
y 47 OPER FUND $3,790.43
I X7 CAP FAC FUND $03,566.30
CT X11 OPER FUND $6,963.94
X14 CAP FAC FUND $8,425.66
X667 OPER FUND $2,638.41
X7B14 OPER FUND $27.10
JT OPER FUND 4622,250.11
CORD $2,264,469.54
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $491,759.53
JT WORKING CAPITAL $113,813.08
---------------
$3,694,071.32
d
a -
FUND NO 919LJ - JT DIST YCRxINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/IN/92 PAGE 1
PEPORT NUMBER AF43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/23/92 POSTING DATE 09,13/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
126746 AS IECP COMPANY 5119.867.6U RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
124747 ACAC f131.00
PUBLICATION
1247 T9 AS ANALYSIS f1.040.07 ENGINE OIL ANALYSIS
124709 p 6 I f1.172.61 LONG DISTANCE REN THL6PH0N8 BERVIC63
124751 ACTION RENTALS E f1s185.00 AIR DUCT RENTAL
120751 AIR DOLT CLEANING s000.o& AIR DUCT CLBANINC
124152 AIRALL COLA SUPPLY INC 1128.91 AIR CONDITIONER PARTS
124754 ALL/EL SIFFLI CC S1.$52.65 VALVE
124755 pYiT Cx 152.6E INSTRUMENTASUPPLIES
PARTS
124756 ANGEL SCIENTIFIC RI UTIONAI$ $634.75 LAB 9UPPLI83
124757 ANIAIEX DISTRIBUTION .331.83 COMPUTER PARTS
124750 A•PI LS 007CRIE $1$231.31 N0TICE8 6 A08
12479E ARC IAE CSERVICES $239.0. LAB SERVICES
12470 ARATET SERVICES INC 3/00.50 UNIFORM RENTALS
124761 ASS TECHNOLOGIES far 000.00 DATA PROCESSING TR SERVICES
124761 DENTAL AOMINIS. t CONSULTANTS 990.00 COBRA ADMINISTRATION CON UFEES
LTA
fTl 124763 DENTAL INS UpAACE CONSULT, 350.00 DENTAL INSURANCE CONSULTANTS
X 124164 AVSA f350.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION
S 120764 ACIC DSPCPUST AL SUPPLY
CC fl$479.13 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT
124766 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC .117.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES
b0 124766 BNN LANDFILL $1.253.13 SAFETYRESIDUALSSUPPLIES
REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
124161 BAY SAFETY t SUPPLY f1.253.13 SAFETY SUPPLI88
124769 1,BANANA PLLEPRINI lS.770.00 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES
I 124769 0 TEREF AN 3600.65 BATTERIES
COMP DISTRIBUTION
I 124771 BATTERY DIAGNOSTICS
3110.65 LATT8RI89
1'•' 124712 BAIEPR DIAGN OSIICS INC 17.121.21 LAB ENGINEERING
124773 BCOCAI BETA YILI UN FRCSI f10.618.11 SECURITY
VIRVICE9 5-33
124773 BELL SECLP i7Y - S960.49 SECURITY IERVIC68
124775 BIC SAFETY $100.53 LAB SUPPLIES
124776 BCEFAINGEF MAENMCIN $424.66 LAB 9UPPLI83
124777 BUDGET -FIEDLERJANITORIAL
1 ASSOC IN .650.60 LAB SUPPLIJANITORIAL
124778 BUDGET JANITORIAL 31 r 134.00 JANITORIAL SERVICES
12477E BUILT ER rS EMPOA TUN 594.33 HARDWPETTY CASH
124779 BABY G SiAE[D $3.594.33 PETTY CASH RBIMBUR86M6NT
124780 CCfp 9595A0 LAB SUPPLIES
1207 C N 1 1116.50 ELECTRICTRIC R REPAIRS
124/8282 SUMMIT SOLUTIONS. INC $9.152.73 HAIWENAINSTRUMENT AGREEMENT
124783 CS ETRCK S f99242.43 INSTRUMENT PARTS
124765 LAPIFTPLA SYSTEMS 3292.03 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1241E5 CAL•FAL INC NICAL f.E INC 1197.30 CHEMICALS
1248 CALTROL INC f333.30 INSTRUETNNT SUPPLI69
12478
7 JOHN
P [AALIC CC PSI 919r475.4L OCEAN MONITORING M.0.11-14-90
124769 CALIFCPNll ALTL CCLLIEI OA 1M[ f1r639.1tl TRUCE PARTS
124796 CALIFCPNIA SUFRESSIC ESIC 9589.03 SERVICE AGREEMENT
/ 124756 CAST -RU AlI SUF RE SSICN SYSTEM f599.03 SERVICE AGREEMENT
124191 CAST •PUSCO fL 391.B3 86CURITY SUPPLI69
FORD NC 9199 - JT DIST L(PPIRE CAPITAL PROCESSING DOTE 9/IA/92 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/23/92 POSTING DATE 09/23/92
WARRANT NC. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
124792 CE hIURY SAFETY INST L SUPP 52.791.67 SAFETY SUPPLIES
124793 CITY OFFICE FURNITURE INC $1.398.98 OFFICE FURNITURE
124794 COLICM AID SCNS 11.753H98.90 CONSTRUCTION I-9
124795 CCMPLACC S2.191.94 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
12096 COMPLIER BAY $142.23 LAB SUPPLIES
124797 EDhPVTER PRODUCTS PLUS 9166.47 OFFICE SUPPLIES
124796 COMPUSA. INC. $712.13 COMPUTER HARDWARE/SOFTWARE
124799 COEPCSERVE 321.78 COMPUTER SERVICES
124R00 COAS(LICPTEC ELECTRICAL LIST 95.153.12 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
124SL1 CChTIREKTAL AIR TOCLS INC $183.24 TOOLS
124802 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO $4.648.75 CHLORINE M.O.9-9-91
124803 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 0 C $3.153.26 ENGINEERING SGOVICES
124804 COSTA MESA AUTC StPPLV 3973.36 TRUCK PARTS
124R05 CCSTPR 599.02 LAB SUPPLIES
1246Ct CCUNIV LHCLEEALE ELECTRIC 1576.91 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
124867 CPLMICAL FROCESSCRS AND/OR $1.943.70 CHEMICALS
124808 CUNTIN MATHCSON SCIENTIFIC $219.21 LAB SUPPLIES
ITT X 124809 CA UEPT OF HEALTH SERVICES $3.45t.30 LAB CERTIFICATION FEES
= 124010 STATE WATER RESOLPCES CONIRCL S42.95 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS FEES - PLT 1
124011 STATE WATER RESCLRCCS CORIPCL $32.79 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS FEES - PLT 2
w 129812 CAhIELS 71PE SERVICE $038.77 TIRES
124813 DE AK2A CPRPCRATIOA 1150.V0 EQUIPMENT RENTALS
124814 DE Ah2A SAYSIDE VILLAGE 13,199.87 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
124815 DIFTEC ENVIRONMENTAL 11.830.57 CHEMICALS
I 124EI6 CIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES S62.93 PRINTING
IV 124811 DIGIIAL EGLIf VEAL CORP $673.46 OFFICE EQUIPMENT
124818 UIONEN CCPP• 17,504.88 SERVICE AGREEMENT
124619 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC $1,040.03 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
129P20 DRENELPROC■ EKGR $609.67 INSTRUMENT PARTS
124821 DURN ECORCE CCRF $2.149.10 PAINT SUPPLIES
124822 FIL INSIFLM[K1S INC 346.79 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124823 EPA SERVICES IhC $9.989.99 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-44
12R829 EASTMAN INC 33.769.3t OFFICE SUPPLIES
124825 ENCHANTER INC $3.920.GP. OCEAN MONITORING M.O.7-17-91
124826 ENVIPCNPERIAL RCSCIIACE ASSCC $646.50 LAB SERVICES
128827 FMM COPIER FFCCtCTS 1539.9E PRINTING SUPPLIES
129B2B PST $ARC ARC ERAVEI IRC 1478.60 ROAD BASE
124029 P.ARSFALL FAIRR[S 3128.06 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
124830 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE 37.207.16 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
124831 JCHN B 6ALMEhSIEIK Ft 33.400.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9, 1-16
129832 FECEHAL EIPRESS COPE $726.51 AIR FREIGHT
124833 FISCHCR 1 PONTE.R CO 15.957.88 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
229034 FLAT AND VERTICAL INC. 5335.9E CONCRETE CUTTING
124835 FLO-SYS1[PS 52.913.3t' PUMP PARTS
124836 FCRFA SCIENTIFIC. INC. $171.37 LAB SUPPLIES
224031 FCUNIGIN VALLEY CAMERA $11.50 FILM
a
FUND NC %99 - JT DIST WERMINC CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/10/92 $AGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCLh7Y SAN17A77Ch DISTRICTS OF CRANCE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAIL G9/23/92 POSTING DATE 09/23/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
124838 FCURTe1h VALLEY FAINT 31,386.00 PAINT SUPPLIES
124E39 FCA 1NDUS7RlAL SALES 51.346.3. TOOLS
124840 THE FOMBORG CO 5496.27 INSTRUMENT
124841 JCRDAK CORTROLS. INC. $1.100.63 INSTRUMENT PARTS
324842 FREECOM IMAGING 1151.0E SERVICE AGREEMENT
124843 PUC FRET 521.16 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
124944 CITY OF FULLCRTCN $119.91 WATER USE
124845 SA14AHL LUMBER CO SA5.65 HARDWARE/LUMBER
124846 GENERAL ELECTRIC SLPPLY CC. $1.II4.P5 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
124847 GENERAL IELEFHCNE CC $933.67 TELEPHONE SERVICES
12964E GIERLICP-PITQELL IPC s9.027.3C NECHANICAL PARTS
120849 GOOUWAY TOOLS COPP. 11,63 A.82 SLECTRIC PARTS
124850 GRAPHIC CONTROLS $174.41 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124RE1 GRAPHIC OISIRIBUTCRS f226.2P PHOTO SUPPLIES
1241'.2 CCR CREEP S ASSOCIATES $23.500.00 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-I1-92
124853 hP 7TFE L EPAFPICS S14.28 PRINTING
m 12054 NA14BCUR EAGINEERING $11.695.00 PUMP PARTS
X 124655 FRED A HARPER $1.500.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
2 1248`6 HARRINGTON INOUSTRIAL FEAST? 5975.20 GAUGE
�. 124857 hATCP L MIRK INC $219.69 INSTRUMENT PARTS
124850 PL PAWN CO INC $116.37 FILTER
—I 124859 HELPMATES TEMPORARY SERVICES 3980.38 TEMPORARY SERVICES
124860 HEWLETT PACKARD 5690.60 SERVICE AGREEMENT
w 124R61 HE6LETT FACKAPD CPPPAMV 1490.27 LAB SUPPLIES
W 1248f2 HI STeNCARC ALIOMITIVE 16.421.45 TRUCK PARTS
124863 J.7. HORVATH S ASSOC. 12Y100.WC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17
124869 RS HUGHES CO INC $971.63 SAFETY SUPPLIES
124065 HURTINGTOR REACH RUPREP STA 39.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES
124666 HLNTIRGTCh SLPPLV 946.22 HARDWARE
124961 IPPERIAL WEST ChEMICAL 501,473.62 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.0.11-14-90
124868 INDUSTRIAL THREADED FRODUCTS $1,340.72 CONNECTORS
JERSEY INGRAP PAPER 15.939.E-u JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124878 INTERFOUNIAIN SCIENTIFIC CCRP 9427.69 LAB SUPPLIES
124671 PACTEL lEIETRAC 5351.81 COMPUTER SYSTEM RENTAL
124872 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEMS $1.292.99 BATTERIES
124873 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT $72.14 WATER USE
124074 JLA CRECII CCRF $145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE
125875 GREAT 6EEIERN SANIIAhY SLFF 52.082.1P. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
124876 JAY-S C47ERIKG 1160.0G DIRECTORS' MEETING EXPENSES
124877 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO 1104.27 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124878 JIM.S SUSPENSION SERVICE S2S.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS
12409 JP JEPNSOh CENERAL CCNTR 12.931.UU CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-7-4
12<P.RO JCPAS70NE SLFPLY 53C1.4S ELECTRIC PARTS
124881 JCNES GEYICALS INC 32.C40.76 CHEMICALS
124882 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE C $2.746.43 ELECTRICAL PARTS
124883 MARS. ADVANCED MATERIALS INC 30.998.58 LAB SERVICES
FUND KC S195 - J1 DIST WCRKIKC. CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/IF/92 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AF43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 09/23/92 POSTING DATE 09/23/92
WARRANT &C. VENCCP AMOUNT OESCRIPTION
124884 NCEVGN A ASSOCIATES 14.950.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES
124885 KING GEARING INC SI.280.75 MECHANICAL PARTS
124806 ANDY INDLSTk IAL SUFFLIES 9273.12 TOOLS
124887 PARllk N(ACICK SR $2.629.50 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
124RP8 LAU EFFICES CF PCFEAT L LAVCIC 998.11 LEGAL SERVICES - FLORES V. DALEY
124889 LAYFAR. .(ALS L CYE. LAWYERS $15.005.49 LEGAL SERVICES - COOPER IND.
L24690 LLVCO ELECTRIC CO $118.65 TRUCK REPAIRS
124091 KP LIN9STROM IEC $7.199.68 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL
1241192 MPS 3150.53 PHOTO SERVICES
124993 PSI PETAL ELPFLY INC 5303.55 METAL
124894 MACOPCO S91D.65 SERVICE AGREEMENT
124895 NANTEK $2.346.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124696 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 548.59 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124657 M41T - CPLCP ARC $2.923.56 CHLORINATION PARTS
124958 0CR PACRER 31.620.D0 CONSULTING SERVICES
124859 MECHANICAL CNENGV SYSTEM S25.E0 REFUND USER FEE OVERPAYMENT
124900 MICROAGC OF CCRRITOS 13.894.99 COMPUTER PARTS
TYl 124901 MTPWAY KFC 3 MACHINING $4.985.63 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
X 124902 FIRE SAFETY AFPLIAACES CC $3.759.95 SAFETY SUPPLIES
._-. 1245(3 PISSICN AEPASIVE SUFFLIES S942.81 MECHANICAL PARTS
b0 124944 MITCPELL INSTRUMENT CO $553.00 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
124905 NLADEN BUNIICN CONSTRUCTION 3541.066.SU CONSTRUCTION 2-30
124906 MORGAN CRANE CO INC $474.85 TRUCK PARTS
to 120907 MCSSY YEAR RDO0 $610.31 LAB SUPPLIES
1 124908 PCTICK IACUSIRIES INC $450.72 MECHANICAL PARTS
r 1249CS PCICRCLA PAC 36.000.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
124910 STANCARC REF. MATE. PPOGRAP $432.A0 PUBLICATIONS
124911 NATIONAL RESEARCH COUN-CANADA $655.45 PUBLICATIONS
124912 NU-WEST FABRICATION 9700.57 FILTERS
124933 CCCUPATICA)L VISION SERVICES 4503.25 REIMBURSABLE SAFETY GLASSES
124914 CFFICE FI$ILICK/IKTIRICF FES 930,567.11 OFFICE FURNITURE M.0.6-10-92
124915 OF SYSIEPS CC S12.643.18 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91
124916 ORACLE CORPORATION $1.750.06 TRAINING REGISTRATION
124917 ORANGE VALVE 3 FITTING CO. $838.11 FITTINGS
124918 CRANEE CVENFEAC COCP COFFIN $217.30 DOOR REPAIRS
124919 CEtC( SELF-FLACEC PECICAL 1 1100.000.00 PREMIUM ADVANCE
12492U CCUNIY SAKITATICK DISTRICT 114.473.05 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
124921 PACCO SALES $564.76 PAINT SUPPLIES
124922 PACIFIC EAFPGY PESOUPCES S5.000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES P2-45-1
124923 PACO FUPFS $220.69 PUMP PARTS
124524 PACIFIC SAFETY EOUIPFEKT CC 32.000.11 SAFETY SUPPLIES
124925 PACIFIC EELL $46.36 TELEPHONE SERVICES
124926 PACICL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 3241.97 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
124927 FAM WEST 5405.37 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
12g92P PARTS LKLIPITED $1.552.78 TRUCK PARTS
124929 FEAT YGRIICN PAIR 9 CC S3.000.0C AUDITING SERVICES M.O.3-13-91
FUND NO 9199 - JT UIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/18/92 PAGE 5
REPORT NUMRER AF43
COUNTY SANITAIICN DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CDUN TV
CLAIRE PAID L9/23/92 POSTING DATE t9/23/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
124930 ROY PENCEREPAFI $469.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
1249l1 PERKIR-ELPER COFFOPATION $3.065.17 LAB SUPPLIES
124932 PLNMA LUERICATICK INC $579.42 MACHINE SUPPLIES
124933 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC $125.683.60 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91
124934 PIONEER BANK 524.555.54 CONSTRUCTION RETENTION 5-34-3
124935 PCLYFLPE INC 114,957.77 CATIONIC POLYMER M.O.)-17-91
124936 POWER EIECTRC SCPPLY CC 5361.77 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
124927 FCREP (RACK IAC 5100.69 PUMP PARTS
12493E PRLCISION INDUSTRIES 143.54 HARDWARE
124939 FREMIUM CONNECTING POINT S594.E4 COMPUTER PARTS
124940 THE PROJECT SCLUTIONS CO. 54.960.0C INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
124941 PPS INC 51.721.2E GRAPH SERVICES
124545 STFVE F. RACCE. IRC. $203,040.90 CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A-2, 1-16
124943 THE REGISTER $245.7C NOTICES 6 ADS
124944 REISH MARINE STUDILS. INC SGS0.00 OCEAN MONITORING
124945 MCJUNNIN-PEFUBLIC $UFPLT 1640.38 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
12494E Rich COLCP LAE 582.1E PRINTING
ITT 124547 PCC911LL ELECIPIC 525.00 REFUND PLANS 6 SPECS FEES
X 124948 RCSEPCUhT 91,529.49 INSTRUMENTS
ti 124949 FLGGY RUPP $540.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
W 124950 SAFETY-KLEEN CORE $260.10 PARTS CLEANER
1249!1 SAKIA AAA RIVER FLCCO $1.250.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES M.O.8-12-92
124952 SAATA FE IRCUSTRIAL FLASTICS $469.90 PLUMBING BUPPLIEB
W 1249!3 CCLC SAPLII 32.925.0E FIRST AID/CPR TRAINING
1 124954 SEA-BIRC ELECTPCRICS IAC 5125.CC LAB SUPPLIES
N 124955 SEA COAST UESIGNS 543.05 OFFICE MACHINE
124956 SNUAELUCK SALES $2.909.97 GASKETS
1249!7 SILVERI L LE RCUEF 5221.026.50 CONSTRUCTION 5-34-3
1249!6 SLIDE PAIIER 9438.33 SLIDES
124959 SIITh-EPEAV CO $1.014.30 SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91
I24960 SO COAST AIR QUALITY 140G.00 PERMIT FEES
124961 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY $3.500.00 SOURCE TESTS
1249E2 SO CALIF ALLIARCE OF PUBLIC $24.000.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES M.O.0-12-92
1249E3 SCUTFERR CALIF ECTSCK CC $919,905.94 POWER
124564 SC CALIF EEISCR CC $25.000.00 DEPOSIT J-19-1
124965 SC CALIF WATER CO 538.41 WATER USE
124466 WESTALLOV INC 591.61 WIRE/CABLE
124967 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS IRC 2516.83 HARDWARE
124968 SPPIAGEA-LERLAG 1756.65 PUBLICATIONS
124969 STAPLES $40.54 OFFICE FURNITURE
124976 STERLING ART 1151.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES
124971 SUNSET FORD $44.04 TRUCK PARTS
124972 SUF'ELCO INC 9590.68 LAB SUPPLIES
124973 TCh ASSCCIATES 5995.69 LAB SUPPLIES
124974 TENCRAIILICS 32.J82.05 MECHANICAL PARTS
124975 IELALIOCPIFh CCFFCRAIIGA $119.16 FAX MACHINE REPAIRS
FUND NC glgq • JI DIST NCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 9/I0/92 PAGE E
REPORT NUMBER AP43
CCLRTY SANITAIICR DISTRICTS OF CRANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS FAID 05/23/92 POSTING DATE C9/23/92
YARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
12491E THCPFSOK IRCLSTPIAL SUPPLY $269.15 MECHANICAL PARTS -
124977 ICKY.S LOCK L SAFE SERVICE 52.357.36 KEYS 6 LOCKS
124978 TRAVEL TRAVEL 1260.00 TRAVEL SERVICES
124979 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY INC 545.29 TRUCK PARTS
124900 UNOCAL $46.10 UNLEADED GASOLINE
124961 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE $125.56 PARCEL SERVICES
124982 VLP SCIEA11FIC $3.143.43 LAB SUPPLIES
12490 VALIR CCRPORATION 5589.93 ELECTRIC PARTS
124904 VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CD $2.935.25 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
124985 VERTEX SYSTEMS $8.850.00 COMPUTER DATA SUPPORT
124586 VILLAGE KLRSERIES S829.73 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
1249E7 NEATEER AAC VIAD INSIRUMERT 5597.51 SAFETY SUPPLIES
1249E8 LESTERK STATES CFFPICAL SLFFLY 97,974.06 CAUSTIC SODA M.0.9-8-90
124969 VESCC $1.220.72 ELECTRIC PARTS
124990 NHESSOE VAREC 915.454.91 STEEL
124991 MATEO SCIENTIFIC 1905.1U LAB SUPPLIES
124952 XEROX CCFP 12.278.50 COPIER LEASES
Ill 124993 GECREE VARCLEY CC $286.62 PUMP PARTS
X 114554 PICHARD E ECGXP 1200.00 DEFERRED COMP DISTRIBUTION
.............
to TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 09/23/92 •$4.607,861.26
lb
C1
SUMMARY AMOUNT
11 OPER FUND $242.30
41 CAP FAC FUND $43,374.19
42 OPER FUND $3,773.23
02 CAP FAC FUND $552,985.27
43 OPER FOND $35,756.81
G5 OPER FUND $4,442.59
25 CAP PAC FUND $256,750.44
86 OPER FUND $182.39
07 OPEN FUND $2,072.09
47 CAP FAC FUND $27,705.16
011 OPER FUND $880.86
013 OPER FUND $37.80
K14 OPER FUND $30.94
014 CAP FAC FUND $164,826.79
0566 OPER FUND $3,570.20
0566 CAP FAC FUND $1,140.31
87614 OPER FUND $6,250.93
JT OPER FUND $1,367,972.96
CORP $1,877,141.52
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $119,701.16
JR RKING CAPITAL $139,015.32-- -
- =607,861_26
RE: AGENDA ITEM N0. 14 Y0
BRINDERSON CORPORATION
November 16, 1992 1� F.rt.i -S w959
SLN 0343 Pa a 19a19
imna Cdh1IXM1a 9P15
(714)752-51M•FM(714)I 11F
CORPORATE NEn00l1NRtERS
Orange County Sanitation
District No. 1
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, CA 92728
Attention: Mr. Wayne Sylvester
Reference: Central Power Generation Systems
at Treatment Plant No. 2
Huntington Beach, California
Job No. 1-19-2
Subject: Proposed Settlement Agreement
between Brinderson, Cooper & Districts
Gentlemen:
Section 38 of the above referenced agreement calls for a $2,000,000 letter of credit or
other securities in a form approved by the District.
Brinderson proposes to provide the following in lieu of the letter of credit.
1. Brinderson agrees that upon execution of this Agreement and approval of Change
Order Nos. 15 and 16 by the Board of Directors of District, all sums due and
owing Brinderson for accepted and completed work, approximately $600,000,
pursuant to the contract and all Change Orders, together with the $500,000
retention, for a total of $1,100,000, shall be held by the District until the final
determination and allocation of financial responsibility, as provided for in the
Settlement Agreement, is agreed to or ordered by the Arbitrator.
2. Brinderson will advance the full cost and expense, in the estimated amount of
$1,218,181, for the Auxiliary Engine System Recovery Work until the final
determination and allocation of financial responsibility, as provided for in the
Settlement Agreement and ordered by the Arbitrator.
National Constructors
Orange County Sanitation
District No. I
Mr. Wayne Sylvester
November 16, 1992
Page 2
3. Brinderson's Payment& Performance Bond, in the amount of$21,426,998, with
the Aetna shall remain in full force for the completion and final acceptance of the
]-19-2 contract.
4. Our insurance companies have been notified of the Settlement Agreement and
have agreed to support Brinderson legally and financially through the completion
and final acceptance of the project.
In closing I want to add that Brinderson has been in business for over 25 years.
Brinderson has never walked away from a project, no matter how severe or costly the dispute.
Brinderson is absolutely committed to see this project to the successful completion and
acceptance by the District.
Very truly yours,
BRINDERSON CORPORATION
Ron Smith
Vice President
RS/jik
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
,w'"""- - / W GRANGE COUNTY. CAUFORNIR
November 18, 1992 1O EWSAKM
n.n KX Ein
WYMYN V1LLtY.G41WIM�YiTA117)
STAFF REPORT
CENTRAL POWER GENERATOR SYSTEM AT PLANT NO, I
JOB NO, 1-19-1
After Advanced Engines Technology Corporation (AETC) investigated Treatment Plant No. 2
Central Generation facilities, staff issued a purchase order, within staff authority, to AETC to
review the work at the Central Generation facilities at Plant No. 1. Preliminary work by AETC
indicates that there are also problems at Reclamation Plant No. 1, including the following:
• Contamination of the on-engine piping for fuel, water and air.
• Lube oil leaks around the turbo-charger oil seal.
• The same lube oil and air filter problem identified at Plant No. 2.
• Excessive water scale in the engines.
• Poor on-engine pipe welding.
The engines have not yet been started at Plant No. 1 (nor filled with oil or water.) We have
notified Cooper of these problems; however, we have not yet received a satisfactory response.
Separately, as the Directors are aware, the lubricating oil piping is proposed to be reconfigured
to a Cooper standard. The lube oil piping at Plant No. 1 was designed and configured in the
same manner as Plant No. 2. The reconfiguration is nearly done at Plant No. 1 by the
Contractor, Hunter, on a time and material basis at a cost of about $200,000.
In addition to the lube oil reconfiguration, an unknown quantity of work will have to be
performed on the engines prior to start-up. Whether or not Cooper does the work; and whether
or not Hunter, or others are asked to do it, job delays have and will occur. The delay costs
may approach $100,000. The clean up may add another $100,000.
Finally, Directors are aware that the original Purchase Agreement with Cooper provided that
Cooper supply installation, start-up, and inspection supervision. Since that was not satisfactory
at Plant No. 2, staff believes that these services could best be supplied by AETC at Plant
No. 1. Accordingly, staff is requesting that the Directors authorize AETC to provide start-
up/inspection services and authorize the General Manager to issue a change order to the
purchase order previously issued to AETC, increasing the amount from $25,000 to $166,000.
TMD:jac
ENG\3710U-19-1.SR1
' /�/'� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
.���./�,�y}� & ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
November 18, 1992 A+^"'^^7
00.T e,z7
FOUNTAIN VALLEY.UAUFOANA 92728 SIF7
STAFF REPORT 'nuleszz<„
CENTRAL POWER GENERATOR SYSTEM AT PLANT NO, 1
JOB NO, J-19-1
After Advanced Engines Technology Corporation (AETC) investigated Treatment Plant No. 2
Central Generation facilities, staff issued a purchase order, within staff authority, to AETC to
review the work at the Central Generation facilities at Plant No. 1. Preliminary work by AETC
indicates that there are also problems at Reclamation Plant No. 1, including the following:
• Contamination of the on-engine piping for fuel, water and air.
• Lube oil leaks around the turbo-charger oil seal.
• The same lube oil and air filter problem identified at Plant No. 2.
• Excessive water scale in the engines.
• Poor on-engine pipe welding.
The engines have not yet been started at Plant No. 1 (nor filled with oil or water.) We have
notified Cooper of these problems; however, we have not yet received a satisfactory response.
Separately, as the Directors are aware, the lubricating oil piping is proposed to be reconfigured
to a Cooper standard. The lube oil piping at Plant No. 1 was designed and configured in the
same manner as Plant No. 2. The reconfiguration is nearly done at Plant No. 1 by the
Contractor, Hunter, on a time and material basis at a cost of about $200,000.
In addition to the lube oil reconfiguration, an unknown quantity of work will have to be
performed on the engines prior to start-up. Whether or not Cooper does the work; and whether
or not Hunter, or others are asked to do it, job delays have and will occur. The delay costs
may approach $100,000. The clean up may add another $100,000.
Finally, Directors are aware that the original Purchase Agreement with Cooper provided that
Cooper supply installation, start-up, and inspection supervision. Since that was not satisfactory
at Plant No. 2, staff believes that these services could best be supplied by AETC at Plant
No. 1. Accordingly, staff is requesting that the Directors authorize AETC to provide start-
up/inspection services and authorize the General Manager to issue a change order to the
purchase order previously issued to AETC, increasing the amount from $25,000 to $166,000.
TMD:jac
ENG\3710U-19-1.SRI
f
REPORT OF THE JOINT CHAIRMAN
NOVEMBER 17. 1992
1 ) PRESENTATION OF PRIDE SUGGESTION AWARDS
AT ITS LAST MEETING , THE FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE
APPROVED 15 PRIDE COST SAVING OR SAFETY SUGGESTION
AWARDS TO EMPLOYEES , TOTALING $9, 123 . 00.
THE PRIDE PROPOSALS ARE ESTIMATED TO SAVE
APPROXIMATELY $190, 000.
TONIGHT WE WOULD LIKE TO RECOGNIZE THREE OF THE
EMPLOYEES WHO RECEIVED THE MAXIMUM $1500 FOR THEIR
SUGGESTION.
I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THEIR DEPARTMENT HEAD, BOB OOTEN ,
TO INTRODUCE EACH OF THE EMPLOYEES AND GIVE A BRIEF
SUMMARY OF THEIR SUGGESTIONS .
A. JOHN KAVOKLIS: PRIDE NO. 178 - DISTRIBUTION
OF FILTRATE SOLIDS.
B . DAVID HEINZ: PRIDE NO. 215 - ACTIVATED SLUDGE
PLANT POWER REDUCTION .
C. JEFFREY REED: PRIDE NO. 252 - ELLIS PUMP STATION
OPERATION REDUCTION.
-ITEM 2 ON NEXT PAGE-
r
2) PRESENTATION OF 35 YEAR SERVICE AWARD TO GREGG PAMSON
GREGG PAMSON STARTED WITH THE DISTRICTS 35 YEARS AGO
" IN THE LABORATORY.
OVER THE YEARS HE WORKED HIMSELF UP TO HEAD THE
LABORATORY.
GREGG NOW DEVOTES HIS TIME TO OPERATIONAL RESEARCH .
HE BRINGS A SENSE OF PRAGMATISM TO HIS RESEARCH
AND OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES, AND HELPS EVERYONE ELSE
KEEP THEIR FEET FIRMLY PLANTED ON THE GROUND .
OVER THE YEARS HIS EFFORTS HAVE CONTRIBUTED
SIGNIFICANTLY TO IMPROVING THE EFFECTIVENESS AND
EFFICIENCY OF OUR OPERATIONS.
-ITEM 3 ON NEXT PAGE-
`.)
3) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS OF APPRECIATION FOR RETIRING
DIRECTORS
.. AS YOU KNOW , BECAUSE OF THE RECENT ELECTION AND
COUNCIL REORGANIZATIONS , SEVERAL OF OUR DIRECTORS ARE
RETIRING FROM THE BOARDS .
I WOULD THEREFORE LIKE TO INTRODUCE FOR THE BOARDS'
CONSIDERATION , ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS EXPRESSING
APPRECIATION TO THOSE DIRECTORS AND RECOGNIZING THEIR
OUTSTANDING CONTRIBUTIONS TO OUR WASTEWATER
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM .
RESOLUTION
NO. DIRECTOR'S NAME CITY DISTRICTS)
92-154 NORMAN CULVER GARDEN GROVE 3
... SANITARY DIST .
92-168 DAN GRISET SANTA ANA 1
92-169 PAT MCGUIGAN SANTA ANA 3
92-170 BOB MAIN GARDEN GROVE 2
SANITARY DIST .
92-171 ARTHUR NEWTON PLACENTIA 2
92-172 RUTHELYN PLUMMER NEWPORT BEACH 6
92-173 SALLY ANNE SHERIDAN IRVINE 14
WE WILL HAVE PLAQUES PREPARED AND ASK EACH OF THEM TO
RETURN AT A FUTURE MEETING FOR A FORMAL PRESENTATION
(WITH THE EXCEPTION OF A SPECIAL PRESENTATION TO
NORM CULVER TONIGHT - SEE NEXT ITEM) .
-ITEM 4 ON NEXT PAGE-
4) PRESENTATION OF PLAQUE AND RESOLUTION TO RETIRING
DIRECTOR NORM CULVER
WE WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A SPECIAL PRESENTATION TO
RECOGNIZE NORM CULVER TONIGHT
NORM IS OUR RECORD HOLDER . HE IS RETIRING AFTER
30 YEARS OF SERVICE ON THE SANITATION DISTRICTS' BOARD
OF DIRECTORS .
NORM IS A PAST JOINT CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT NO . 3 CHAIRMAN ,
AND HAS BEEN THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BUILDING COMMITTEE
EVER SINCE ITS INCEPTION.
(PRESENT RESOLUTION AND PLAQUE TO NORM)
(GENERAL MANAGER HAS A STAFF MEMENTO TO PRESENT TO
NORM)
BEST OF ALL, WE'VE PREPARED A SPECIAL CAKE FOR NORM
THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT TO HIM , AND WE HAVE A
PIECE OF CAKE FOR EVERYONE ELSE TO ENJOY AS WELL .
5) PRESENTATION OF DISTRICTS' PINS TO NEW DIRECTORS
PRESENT PINS TO NEW DIRECTORS (IF ANY ARE IN ATTENDANCE)
"' -ITEM 6 ON NEXT PAGE-
6) UPCOMING MEETINGS
A. AD HOC COMMITTEE RE SERVICE TO OUTSIDE AREAS -
�. THE AD HOC COMMITTEE RE SERVICE TO OUTSIDE AREAS
IS SCHEDULED TO MEET TOMORROW , THURSDAY,
NOVEMBER 19TH , AT 4:30 P. M.
B . FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE - THE FISCAL POLICY
COMMITTEE IS ALSO SCHEDULED TO MEET TOMORROW ,
THURSDAY , NOVEMBER 19TH, AT 5:30 P . M.
C . JOINT WORKS SELECTION COMMITTEE (JOINT CHAIRMAN
AND VICE JOINT CHAIRMAN ONLY) - THE JOINT WORKS
SELECTION COMMITTEE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30TH AT 8:00 A . M .
7) PASSING OF FORMER BOARD MEMBER, JACK KELLY
(YOU MAY WISH TO COMMENT ON JACK KELLY'S PASSING AND
ADJOURN TONIGHT'S MEETING IN HONOR AND MEMORY OF HIM . )
-END OF REPORT-
MEERNO DATE NOTdIBL 18A 1992 TIME 7:30 P.H. ENSTFUM 1,2,3,5,6,7,11,13 L 14
DISTRICTT JOINT BOARDS
(MI RDSOM . 91YGGf . . . . . MEYER) ... .... ... . . .. .BARBERA....
MEYER) . . . . . SARRERA. . .. MRSYI... ............G)lEl .. ...
(PONROUS) . . . SALTAREI) . .L (Scam ...............fAlEY ....JL —_
(ROTM . . . . . . STAMCN . . .. (0.U)AIE14 .............CGt. ... ...�
nRRYMM9. . . WA4mm ...... MAW) . ...............cam ....y —
DISTRICT 2 (BELL) . ...............BBB.V .....y —
M=WsOIR . . WTDM ..... .e MEL" .....
.........l14EAP _
(SCOTR . . . . . COLLMS ....� (RACE) . ...............EEA1S4 ..... _
MEYER) . . . . . BARREIM....JG ( MCHEIT.............FSpM ..... . —
MORBY) . . . . . CAT . . .. .L (AkONNE)..............WW1.. ..... —
MEW . . . . . . DENES . . ... .0 _— (RXHAROSW4.. . ....... .iIIEEF.. ...
_ _
AORA) . . . YAN L (WEDAA) . . . . . . .. ......YWBIgI
(Cam) . . . . 1)YlN (PLUIWAEM . . .I. ... MART , .... . _
(PA ER) . . . . NEL90N. .. ...
(MES) . . . . . NEWTON . ...g (MRSYTIE) . . . ... .... .,IA830.....
MUNTER) . . . . (0.0PA)
iBRNGi7 . . .. . PUlR1O . ....AG (CULVER) . . . . ..'�lAN44R —
(ROTM . . . .. . 4TAMION. ...JL (WWROM4... ........
SMBYIIWI
OISf7DCT3 MERW"..............MINER J/
(PARKER ..............ID33ON .... ✓
MOTSOM .... 3V ... (TYNE9) ....... ....... —
MEISOM .... BMBlBS...... _ — (DDILLAFl ............ ..PARNER . .. .JG —
MDRBV) ..... (AGE) . . . ........... . .PARISI . . .... _
(Scam (HUNtM
.....
BAAIR . ..... AVER. .... . O"T).......
(RDE . ..... EVA4 ..... . (PUCXD ............
.....PPPOWEUNBI1BE0IRE1 R8...... .
MAIiEY flA. . . ... MATAREY . —
_
•...........
MARINE) . .. . BNfi41. . .. .J/ IBIBBIE�irx) ..............
(MRSYTHE) . . . ARrO . . . . . (PIAIOO) ............ ..RCMMWON _
RBWARoaR4 M61MBM1 . . . (STANiOM . ........... .B-T -he
_
MERYM4 . . . . MMEA. . . . . . ✓ PN x) . .9. ..... ....... .9ALTARELLI . . _
NUNKGE) . . . . . . PARTM . . . ICOAI . . ............ . •W114lIIE _
MNNTEM . . . . PIORER . . .. PWSON)............ . .WIER . . . . .
MOBRAM1LE) . . SILVA . . . . . . R W ONO). ...... .. . . . .811BISB1E0 . . . —
(ROT) . . . . . . STANTOH . . . . (ROBRAEEE)..... . ... . .
(BALES) . . . . MW . . . . . (ROTM . ...... . . . . . . .
ONTTRICTB (WUEA). ...... . . . . . . . .9WAN. . . .. . —
�/ MART) . . . . . . PLUMYFR. . . .JL (BATES) . .. . . . . . . . . . ..
(WlR . . . . . . . KWMEB. . . .JG (FEHRYYMESXERRICIfINEAOE) .WAHNEIi . .. . —
(SiANTQQ. . . . RQM . . . . . . ✓ (OULLStSOM . . . . . . . . . . . .
DISTRICT WaTO ATTEFA O B . . . . .W MC . . . .—
(9HERRIdR . . . WAHNER . . . ._ /` _
TLUMYER) . . . HART . . . . . . I a4AFE OTNEB
(STANTOM. . . . ROM . . . . . .of SYLVESTER. . . . . . ✓ WOOORUPP ..-Age
DISTRICT? B�VIN .. . • .. • • — ANWM .. ...—
ANDETISCN. . ... .
M&TARELO
. . PNE . . . .
E ) . . . . . WR . . HCUA9WEN.SS O.TN..AB................
MEYER . . . BARRERA. . BoRwYG.......
(PLWMce4 . . . . . . . . . .
( W) . . . . . RO SON . 1HHHR1O0pHM 11B00 10.19..1....................
.
(STANTOM. . . . RM . .. . . . KNOPF ......
—_
JC
M1bYAOND) . . . i11e1mR1 . . .
NN R . ...... . JG lFE . . .....JC
CT 71 NELLOR . . .. ..
(WnT . . lIND4fR011 ..—
MDDLTM NELSON. . .... . .
PATTERSOM . . WMCHELL . . .�� MCHOl3 . .. .. . . SHAW. ....._
STONE .....
JG
(ROM . . . . . . 9TANTON . . . ... RENESO.... . . . — WASON.... .
SUPSO
�— SSAPSON ..... . . JG YOUNG .. . . .
SMEED. ..... .
MWAA) . . . . . GLUAMW.._je . ...
(BEYER . . . . . RARREP4. . . .. . . .
D . . . . .... ...
e
MUWM . . . . N E ......e
SANTOM. . . . RM . .....,. R ..+�-
• -
_
MILLER) . . . . . SWAN ...... Ryi{N`v' ai�i�0t'
MEYER(PWETI) . . . . PONTENI4 .. .
(9EY . . . . .
/ (STANTON). . . .
`►" OWA).10N0) . . . iyMiYIEM ... -' ''• '� �^M^'••�V5
V V � 43 9E
PUBLIC SIGN-IN SHEET
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
11/18/92 BOARD MEETING
NAME ORGANIZATION/FIRM
Please Print Please Print
�o S r .eiivo so.✓
11/18/92 JOINT BOARD MEETING NOTES
R6(a) - Report of the Joint Chairman
JC: The next item that I have was not in your agenda packet; however, there is
a change in directorship on the Garden Grove Sanitary District. George L.
Zlaket has been appointed to the District No. 2 position. I would like to have
a motion this evening to approve that.
Director Culver then introduced Mr. Zlaket and Joint Chairman Mahoney welcomed
him to the Boards.
We have a PRIDE program where employees can make suggestions. If in fact there
is a savings to the District, we share that savings with them up to $1,500.00
depending upon the savings to the District. I am proud to tell you there were
fifteen PRIDE suggestions and awards that were made at the last Fiscal Policy
Committee. We have all of those employees who get the maximum amount of
$1,500.00 come before the Boards of Directors. We recognize and thank them for
their contribution to the Districts and at that time I have the privelege of
awarding them with their checks.
I will ask that the department head, Bob Ooten if he will come forward this
evening and introduce the three employees from his department who are the
recipients of the maximum awards.
BO: The first one is John Kavoklis. He recommended modification in our
dewatering system to change the way our recycle flow is distributed and increase
the capacity of the digesters which saves chemicals and increases digester gas
production. This will save an estimated $44,400.00. I recommended that he
receive the maximum award of $1,500.00.
The second award that I have recommended is Dave Heinz. The secondary system
uses alot of energy. Dave has made modifications to reduce horse power in the
secondary system by one-fourth or 150 hp. The first year savings is estimated
to be $80,000.00 and I recommend that he receive the maximum award of $1,500.00.
The third award is Jeff Reed. We have a pump station that brings water to Plant
No. 1. -------- Jeff recommended that we turn the pump station off, reduce the
energy that the pumps were using, reduce the maintenance operation. For this I
recommended the maximum award of $1,500.00.
JC: I think that it is always exciting to see what our employees are doing for
us out there. No only is it a great thing to give them a little bit of money
but basically it makes us look good. I 'd like to tell you that this month the
PRIDE awards that we granted our employees had a total of $9,123.00. You just
saw 50% of that with three individuals. The total savings to the District was
$190,000.00. I would say that one of the best programs we have going is the
PRIDE award program.
It is now my pleasure to make a presentation to a gentleman who has been with
the Sanitation Districts for 35 years. Over the years he worked himself up to
head the laboratory. He now devotes his time to operational research. He
brings a sense of pragmatism to his research and operational activities. He
helps everyone else keep their feet firmly planted on the ground. Over the
r.r
-1-
years his efforts have contributed significantly to improving the effectiveness
and efficiency of our operations. I introduce to you Mr. Gregg Pamson with the
Districts. Mr. Pamson, please come forward.
We have a request for Resolutions of Appreciation for retiring Directors. As
you know, some of our Directors were not running again for re-election and as a
`�../ result they are retiring. I would like to ask for Resolutions of Appreciation
for the following Directors: Norman Culver, Dan Griset, Pat McGuigan, Bob Main,
Arthur Newton, Ruthelyn Plummer and Sally Anne Sheridan. We will make
presentations probably at the January meeting to all of these Directors except
for one.
That one individual has been around here for 30 years. We would like to
recognize Norm Culver tonight. Norm is our record holder. He has been on the
Board of Directors the longest. He has served during his tenure as the Joint
Chairman of the Districts. He has also served as the Chairman as District No. 3
and he has been the only Chairman of the Building Committee. I 'm going to
present a resolution and then I'm going to ask our VJC to present a plaque to
him.
Norm, it has been a real pleasure personally to serve with you on the Sanitation
Districts for the eight years that I have been here. It has been enjoyable
having you here. We wish you the very very best. (He then read the
resolution.)
The VJC then presented Director Culver with his plaque.
JC: We now have a presentation that staff would like to make.
JWS: Norm, it just seems like the other day you came on the Board. I don't
think within those 30 years Norm has missed but one or two meetings and that was
because of Illness. Anytime there was a problem that needed to be addressed,
r..i Norm was always willing to step forward and say •count me in°. Norm, on behalf
of the staff for your 30 years of support and help, I would like to present two
mememtos. (He then presented a rhinestone plunger to Norm Culver.)
Director Roth: From both Roger Stanton and I, we wanted to recognize you for
outstanding service on both the Orange County Sanitation District and also the
Garden Grove Sanitation District. We would like to present you with this pen
set. What this is is a collector item. ---------
Norm Culver then commented on the earlier days of the Sanitation District, on
how there were no chairs for their meetings. He commented on the numerous
people that he enjoyed working with. He remembered the big 5-mile extension out
into the ocean.
JC: We had a special cake made for you. I hope you can all see this - it's a
man climbing out of a manhole. We want you to take this cake home with you. We
also have cake here for everyone else.
While they are passing out the cake, I am going to continue on with a couple of
items. I am going to introduce George Zlaket. George, please come up and also
Barry Hammond.
I would like to welcome you and present each of you with a pin. Wear it with
pride. One of the things that we've always said here at the Sanitation District
is that if you apply yourself, you get more out of it. We're really glad to
�../' have you here.
-2-
We have a couple of upcoming meetings. We have an Ad Hoc Committee re Service
to Outside Areas. This committee will be meeting tomorrow, November 19th, at
4:30 P.M.
The Fiscal Policy Committee is also scheduled to meet tomorrow, Thursday,
November 19th, at 5:30 P.M.
As Director Roth said this evening, our Director, friend and City Councilman
of Huntington Beach, Jack Kelly passed away. This evening when we adjourn, we
will adjourn it in memory of Jack Kelly. Don, thank you for your comments at
the beginning of the meeting.
#6(b)- Report of the General Manager
JWS: Special thanks to our staff members, Anna Ubaldini and Eunice Kizzlah who
baked and decorated those cakes last night on their own time.
If you recall , the Boards authorized a reversal of the Series B Certificates of
Participation SWAP transaction at the last meeting. That SWAP reversal was
effectively accomplished on election day because of alot of activity in the
market. I would like Gary Streed to brief you on the outcome of that
transaction.
GGS: The reversal was effected on election day. Early in the morning (our
time) there was favorable movement in the market. Remember, the Directors had
-------- of between if we would make less than $6.0 million we should bail out.
If we should make $7.0 million we should take the money and run. Early in the
morning we were at $6.9. We took a vote and ask is that close enough or not.
Overwhelming consensus was that it probably was but we ought to confirm that
with a couple of Directors. We did that. In the time that it took us to do
that, the reversal rate when we were talking of $6.9 was 3.39. It had gotten
by noon to 4.44, a considerable move away from us. That amounts to about a
little over a million dollars.
Your Financial Manager called up Merrill Lynch and said what was good enough
this morning is good enough now and prevailed upon them to give us the rate that
was in effect in the morning. We took the money at that time. That deal has
been concluded and the total earnings on that in 11h years is $6.9 million. The
Fiscal Policy Committee will have the detailed report on that tomorrow night.
#6(c) - Report of General Counsel
TLW: Just briefly, in your agenda package I have included an annual report on
the status of various litigation matters. If any Director does have any
questions or comments, I ' ll be happy to comment on them.
Hopefully next month I ' ll have for you a similar report relating to pertinent
legislation that effects the Districts that came out of a past session of the
State Legislature.
Towards the end of the agenda, we will be convening in closed session to review
three items and those will be addressed at that.
-3-
R9(d)(e) - Central Power Generation System at Plant Nos. 1 and 2
Director Collins: Mr. Chairman, I move that we pull items 9(d) and 9(e).
Staff recommendation is to take item 2 which involves rework and negotiate a
rebate with the designer. I would like to move that we approve 9(d) by adding
items 3 and 4 to be re-negotiated with the designer.
TMD: Mr. Chairman, I know Director Collins is concerned that these change order
items that are the result of errors or omissions be fairly treated between the
Districts and its designers. We will talk to the designers and do as directed
by the Boards of Directors.
Director Collins: I would like to move on 9(e) the recommended action except that all
items except item M4 be negotiated with the engineer of the designer.
TMD: Once again, we will do that. These items were all the result of omissions
from the plans and specifications. If there are added costs to these items
because they were added by change order rather than included in the original
contract price, we will do as directed - seek that recovery.
Director Pickler: ??
TMD: The discussions with the designer will have nothing to do with the
project. The project will continue forward.
Director Griffin: ??
Director Collins: There is no intent at this time to have a report back at this
time.
TMD: As I understand, the motion as amended. Does not take issue with the fact
�./ that the change order need be approved but whether or not there is designer
responsibility in the change order.
JC: Any opposition to the motion? Seeing none, it will be deemed approved.
At this time, I would like to ask if Director Catlin if he would give us a
report on the National Water Research Institute (NWRI) of which he serves for
the Sanitation Districts.
Director Catlin: For those Directors who don't know what the NWRI is, I thought
it about time since it has been Iii years for a little bit of briefing to see if
our money is going to the right place.
As a little bit of background, let's tell what the NWRI is. I think Peer Swan
deserves a tremendous amount of credit for encouraging Joan Irvine Smith to get
interested in water. She has very generously come forward. We formed this
organization. The mission is very clearly stated, "To identify and support
research activities that address water supply and water quality needs." To that
end, five local agencies got together to form this group. Those agencies formed
In 1991 and we are one of them. We are contributing $50,000 a year, in addition
to what we do in our normal research. Those organizations are the Orange County
Water District because of the water table, ourselves, Municipal Water District
of Orange County which really wholesales the water to most of the cities except
Fullerton, Santa Ana and Anaheim, the San Joaquin Basin Authority which manages
the ground water based in the South Orange County and then the Irvine Ranch
Water District which Peer heads up.
-4-
Here is an organization who has two staff members. We picked out a very
knowledgeable person in the water district, Ron Lenski. He and his Secretary
really run this organization.
What we have done is gathered together some nineteen or twenty-two key water
people in the country. These are the best talent you can possibly find in
water to advise us on this. We also have an inter-agency committee who reviews
the role of this organization to see if we are headed in the right place.
We are divided into three types of programs. The research project programs are
the ones that we are actively involved in now. What we do is grant money on a
matching basis for research along the lines to see what can be done toward water
quality. We have cooperative programs and then we have developmental programs.
The next slide shows the depth of involvement that we have with the United
States. I will tell you; we are really gaining credibility. Senator Paul Simon
came all the way out here. He is the head of a very important committee to find
out what was going on. Here is an organization that wasn't asking for federal
money. That made an impression. This is really making an impression across the
country. Here we have nineteen states that are involved in this. Orange County
Sanitation District and NWRI is really getting a reputation.
What do we do? Let's take a look at where the money goes and how we are getting
this thing accomplished. Financially what happens is that the NWRI together
with Joan Irvine Smith is putting together approximately $500,000 a year. What
we are trying to do is also encourage utilities, the power companies, the people
that are interested in water, American Water Research Institute to contribute,
universities are doing this, the government is putting a little bit in because
they have become interested. They are saying that this is a way to make
progress with their money and get great mileage out of it. This is where the
1..01 budget is.
Let's take a look at a couple that are being done. We have some tremendous
projects and I have visited most of these projects to see what they are doing.
They are finding what the quality of water is and we are making great progress
on it. Here is one that is being done by one of our participants. Let me read
what the technology is and you will probably have as hard of time as I have of
understanding it. "The development and application of molecular techniques to
detect indicator and pathogenic microorganisms and treated wastewater." Very
interesting but when I read the terminology of this it takes real experts to do
this. We are monitoring this and I think we are making real progress.
The final line that I want to say is there are seven projects that are now in
the process of and they are all matching funds. The final thing I would like to
say is I hope that you will continue to support this program. We couldn't be
doing anything better with our money. We are making a reputation and I think
there is a by-product of this thing. For those of you who don't know what a
301(h) waiver is, it is one that is very important to us. What we are building
is a reputation and I think the by-product of that is nationally EPA recognizes
that this is probably the finest and greatest organization of wastewater in the
country.
-5-
Director Swan: The two people working on the staff are part time not full time
and we are running a $4.0 million research program; the lowest overhead
structure in the country.
M13-Building Committee
..� Director Culver: I would like to invite all of the Directors within the coning
year to tour the new laboratory facility. It is beautiful and top graded in
technology. Make arrangements to come and take a look; it is well worth your
time.
JC: I agree; I have been through it as well . It is a fantastic operation. I
appreciate your comments and I think the point is well taken. I think you would
all be proud of the laboratory.
(Director Griffin voted no on 813(b)(3))
p15-Supplemental Agenda
JC: I would ask Wayne for a brief report as to what we're doing, why we're
doing it and then ask for some action to add it to the agenda and then to take
further action.
JWS: I would like to direct your attention to item (b). The audit report was
reviewed by the Fiscal Policy Committee at their October 21st meeting. It was
supposed to have been agendized to receive, file and approve at tonight' s board
meeting but it was inadvertently omitted from the listing. It was also suppose
to have been mailed last week to you by the auditor, Peat Marwick but that
slipped through the crack as well . They did Federal Express copies last night
and hopefully you received it today.
�.. There is a requirement in our Certificates of Participation indentures that it
be approved by the Boards by the end of November. We would therefore urge that
you consider doing that tonight. As I said, the Fiscal Policy Committee
reviewed it with the auditor at the last meeting. Mr. Steve Sardinia of
KPMG Peat Marwick is here tonight if there are any questions or if you would
like a brief report from him or the Finance Director, Gary Streed. If the
Directors are uncomfortable in accepting the report tonight, you could delay
action until December. However, we would have to seek waivers and extensions
from the COP trustees, banks, insurers and underwriter.
The other action item on the supplemental agenda is (c). At last month's
meeting the Boards authorized a refunding of the 1986 COP issue and a portion of
the 1991 Series B issue. Bond counsel has since determined that an additional
board action is necessary before that transaction can be finalized. I would
like to ask Gary Streed to brief you on that.
GGS: The resolutions that were approved at the last meeting can be improved
upon and that is why we are asking to have this on the agenda tonight. The
resolutions we had and the agreement we thought we had for the liquidity
provision has been improved upon substantially. We now have an irrevocable letter of
credit. It is much better than what we thought we were going to be able to get.
The bond counsel has found that we would be in a much better position regarding
the tax exempt status of these COP's if this board were to take an action
identifying and stating that there will some cost savings involved in going
-6-
through with this transaction. I don't think that I need to mention to you that
we wouldn't be doing it if there weren't some cost savings involved. Today in
accordance with the guidelines we received from the Board and the Fiscal Policy
Committee we locked in the interest rate on the SWAP at 5.55%, a very favorable
interest rate on it (Credit should be given to Patti Gorczyca, the Financial
�..i Manager). The results in gross savings to us of $7.0 million, the PV of those
would be a little over $4.0 million if we can go through with this. There are
indeed some cost benefits to doing this and we would like for you to consider
the action tonight that finds that.
CLOSED SESSION
-7-
10/14/92
- Approve a Mutual Benefit Advances Agreement,
sometimes referred to as a "Cross-Collaterilization
Agreement", between the participating Districts
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these
minutes.
Authorizing finance team to Moved, seconded and duly carried: ,
determine and implement the best
combination of financing Marna- That the finance team be, and is
tives to obtain the most favorable hereby, authorized to determine
overall terms and conditions for and implement the best
the Refunding Certificates of combination of the debt financing
Participation, 1992 Series alternatives to obtain the most
favorable overall terms and
conditions for the Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992
Series, based on the market conditions during the transaction time
frame; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That each District Chairman or Chairman pro tem, Board
Secretary, General Manager, Director of Finance, General Counsel and
any other duly-constituted officer or agent be, and are hereby,
authorized to execute any and all documents necessary and advisable to
effectuate the transactions.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and a rove written
report of the Fiscal Policy That the written report of the Fiscal
Committee Policy Committee meeting held on
September 28, 1992, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 8 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratifying action of Fiscal Policy
ommittee in directing staff to That the action of the Fiscal Policy
negotiate a reversal of the Committee in directing staff to
existing three-year SWAP relative negotiate a reversal of the existing
to the 1990-1992 Ca ital three-year SWAP relative to the
Improvement Program, Series B OP 1990-92 Capital Improvement Program,
Issue Series B COP Issue, when deemed
appropriate by staff and the financing
team, subject to the concurrence of the Chairman of the Fiscal Policy
Committee and the Joint Chairman, be, and is hereby, ratified.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Changing the regular Noveer 11,
1992 meeting of the Jo mb
int Boards to That the regular Joint Board meeting
November 18 1992 date of November 11, 1992, be, and is
hereby, changed to Wednesday,
November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m. due to the Veterans' Day holiday.
-11-
10/14/92
°Interest Rate SWAP
Agreement...................Sets forth terms and
conditions of interest
between Districts and
counterparty
• *Liquidity Guarantee
Agreement...................Guarantees a liquidity
facility at 25 basis
points annual fee
°Guarantee of American
International Group, Inc....Guarantees performance
on SWAP agreement
*Offering Statement..........Informs potential
Investors about the
terms and conditions of
the financing
*Standby Bond Purchase
Agreement...................Sets forth the terms
and conditions of the
liquidity facility
*Remarketing Agreement.......Sets forth the duties
and responsibility of
the remarketing agent �..�
- Authorize execution and delivery of synthetic fixed
rate advance refunding COPS, subsequent to the
negotiation process, with final terms to be
determined by finance team, but not to exceed
$170 million and a term of 25 years
- Authorize underwriter's (PaineWebber) fees not to
exceed $3.50/$1,000 certificate for synthetic fixed
rate transaction
- Authorize selection of State Street Bank and Trust
Company as Trustee Bank (estimated gross fee over
21-year life of issue is $70,000.00)
- Select KPMG Peat Marwick as verification agent
(one-time fee is $3,500.00)
- Authorize selection of AMBAC as municipal bond
insurer (fee is 27 basis points)
- Approve Master Interest Exchange (SWAPs) and approve
liquidity facility with American International
Group, Inc.
-10-
} r
October 14, 1992
agenda material, authorizing acceptance of the work as complete,
`o, execution of the Final Closeout Agreement and filing of the
Notice of Completion as required. The final project cost is
$1,950,061.00.
9(g): AWARD ABANDONMENT OF RED HILL PUMP STATION, PHASE 1, CONTRACT
NO. 7-14-1-1.
In August, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for
Contract No. 7-14-1-1 which provides for the gravity sewer connection as the
first phase necessary for the future abandonment of Red Hill Pump Station in
the Tustin Hills. This is part of District No. 7's plan to eliminate and
abandon nine pump stations in the area, made possible by the recent
construction of the Harvard Avenue Trunk Sewer (HATS) by Irvine Ranch Water
District (IRWD) in Peters Canyon Wash, and by the Director's approval of a
capacity acquisition/flow accommodation agreement with IRWD in June which
allows District No. 7 flows to enter into the IRWD system. Final abandonment
(Phase 2) must await completion of certain local tract sewers tributary to
HATS by various developers.
On September 15, 1992, ten bids were received for said contract. The
bids ranged from a high of $137,410.00 to a low bid of $90,732.00, submitted
by Silveri 6 Le Bouef JV. A complete bid tabulation is attached to the
supporting agenda materials.
Staff recommends award to Silveri & Le Bouef JV for their low bid of
$90,732.00. The engineer's estimate was $140,000.00.
ALL DISTRICTS
11: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF FISCAL POLICY/EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES.
The Fiscal Policy Committee and the Executive Committee met jointly
on September 23, 1992. Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on
their deliberations and recommendations for consideration by the Boards.
12: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF FISCAL POLICY COMMITTEE.
The Fiscal Policy Committee met separately on September 28, 1992.
Enclosed for the Directors is a written report on the Committee's
deliberations and its recommended action for consideration by the Boards.
13: CHANGE REGULAR NOVEMBER JOINT BOARD MEETING DATE TO NOVEMBER 18
1992.
The regularly scheduled November Joint Board Meeting falls on
Veteran's Day, Wednesday, November 11, a legal holiday. It is therefore
-10-
October 14, 1992
DISTRICT 7 `/
9(f): APPROVAL OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO RELOCATION OF MICHELSON PUMP
STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-11-2, AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT AS COMPLETE.
Contract No. 7-11-2, Relocation of Michelson Pump Station, provides
for construction of a reinforced concrete raw sewage pump station, a sewer
force main, and gravity sewers and appurtenances in Michelson Drive and
easements from Von Kerman Avenue east to Carlson Avenue, all in the City of
Irvine, at a cost of $1.9 million. The contract is now complete.
(1) Change Order No. 3
Change Order No. 3 is a net addition of $73,000.00 to the
contract with Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. for one item
of additional work.
This item is the result of additional time being required
to construct the sewer line caused by reduced working hours.
The contract documents, specifically Section 113-6 of the
Detailed Specifications, stated that all construction activities
related to a new sewer line in Michelson Drive, City of Irvine,
would be limited to weekdays between the hours of 7 a.m. and 5
p.m. The Districts' construction permit was approved by the
City with the above authorized work hours. The employee who
approved and signed the Districts' plans, including all traffic
control plans, subsequently left the employ of the City. After
the award of the contract and during the preconstruction
meeting, the City of Irvine verbally directed the District's
contractor to change the working hours to between 9 a.m. and 3
p.m. This extended the job, reduced the hours of productive
work per shift, and increased the cost of work.
If the Directors approve this change order, the total cost
of the change orders to date on this contract will be
$122,925.00. This represents an increase of 6.7% over the
original contract amount, and includes $34,897.00 (1.95) in
added work which will be paid by the Irvine Ranch Water District
under Change Order No. 1.
Staff recommends approval of Change Order No. 3 for an
addition of $73,000.00 to the contract with Mitchell Pacific
Constructors, Inc. There is no time extension associated with
this change order.
(2) Acceptance of Contract as Complete
Mitchell Pacific Constructors, Inc. has fulfilled all
contractual obligations within the specified time. Therefore,
staff recommends adoption of the resolution attached to the
-9-
• October 14, 1992
appropriate to change the regular meeting date to the following Wednesday,
November 18, 1992 at 7:30 p.m.
14: AGENDA FOR CLOSED SESSION.
From time to time it is necessary for the Boards to convene in closed
session to consider purchase and sale of real property, potential or pending
litigation, personnel matters or other matters which are exempt from public
disclosure under the California Public Records Act. In order to avoid a
situation where a closed session is needed but does not appear on the agenda,
this standing item is placed on the agenda each month providing for a closed
session at the regular meeting, if deemed necessary by the Boards.
DISTRICTS 5 AND 6
28: APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM NO. 1 AND AWARD OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BITTER POINT
AND ROCKY POINT PUMP STATIONS, CONTRACT NO. 5-32, AND IMPROVEMENTS TO
BAY BRIDGE PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-33.
In August, the Directors approved the plans and specifications for
Contracts Nos. 5-32 and 5-33 to upgrade and modernize three of our older pump
stations in Newport Beach along Pacific Coast Highway. Each pump station will
receive major electrical upgrades and some other work, but the Bay Bridge Pump
Station, completed in 1966, will receive major mechanical, seismic and
architectural upgrades as well.
(1) Addendum No. 1
Addendum No. 1 to the plans and specifications makes several
technical clarifications as a result of questions during the bidding
or phase.
(2) Award of Contract
On September 15, 1992, six bids were received for said contract.
The four lowest bidders all made mathematical errors in their bids
and when the corrections were made, the low bidder was Uhler, Inc.
The bids ranged from a high of $1,989,000.00 to a low of
$1,765,757.00, submitted by Uhler, Inc. A complete, corrected bid
tabulation is attached to the supporting agenda material.
Staff recommends approval of Addendum No. 1 , and award to Uhler,
Inc. for their corrected low bid amount of $1,765,757.00. The engineer's
estimate was $1,850,000.
-11-
October 14, 1992
DISTRICT 5
%%/
31: APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOUTH COAST TRUNK SEWER,
PHASE 2, CONTRACT NO. 5-35-2.
In March 1988, District 5 entered into a financing and construction
agreement with Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD) which provided for funding
of the South Coast Trunk Sever by IRWD. The South Coast Trunk Sever, will
serve the new downcoast development by The Irvine Company located south of
Corona del Mar. In May 1988, the Directors awarded a professional services
agreement (design contract) to The Keith Companies for design of the project.
During 1989, it became apparent that the South Coast Trunk Sever
would have to be split into two phases because The Irvine Company needed to
proceed with connection of facilities for the Pelican Point Golf Course and
for units in the proximity of Newport Coast Drive; and that new plans for the
design and construction of improvements and widening of Pacific Coast Highway
through the Crystal Cove area would change the long planned alignment of this
project south of Newport Coast Drive. Phase 1, approximately 4,700 feet of
sever between the southerly city limit and a point south of Newport Coast
Drive, Contract No. 5-35-1, was completed in January 1991.
Phase 2, Contract No. 5-35-2, approximately 7,450 feet of sever
beginning south of Newport Coast Drive to a point south of Crystal Cove is now
ready to proceed. Because the South Coast Trunk Sever takes the same
alignment as Pacific Highway (PCH), and because the realignment and widening
of PCH through the Crystal Cove area was delayed by the new highway alignment,
South Coast Trunk Sewer, Phase 2, was concurrently delayed.
Contract No. 5-35-2 was originally planned to be included in a larger
County of Orange construction project for improvements to Pacific Coast
Highway as a separate (but deletable) bid item. However, when bids were
received, the bid item for the District 5 work was considerably higher than
anticipated. Therefore, staff has decided to notify the County to delete this
from their contract. Because this project will now be a District 5 contract,
additional work on the plans moat be done in order to accomplish this. The
funding for this work will be in accordance with the 1988 agreement with IRWD
which provides for IRWD reimbursement of construction costs after project
completion.
Staff recosmends approval of the plans and specifications and
authorization for the General Manager to establish the bid date for Contract
No. 5-35-2. The bid date is tentatively set for November 10, 1992. The
engineer's estimate for this work is $2,300,000.
-12-
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 19 29 39 5, 69 79 119 13 AND 14
OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
ON
NOVEMBER 18, 1992
PNiTAT70N
JrAJ `to,olilve 0".���
rI' u li 'o
Sfoca l9bq �y
OAgNOE COO
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA
' ROLL CALL
An adjourned regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 of Orange County, California, was held on
November 18. 1992. at 7:30 p.m., to the Districts' Administrative Offices. Fallowing the
Pledge of Allegiance and invocation the roll was called and the Secretary reported a
quorum present for Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 as follows:
ACTIVE DIRECTORS ALTERNATE DIRECTORS
DISTRICT NO. 1: Dan-6riset. GhaiMae a Robert Richardson
xFred Barrera. Chat rman pro tem _Gene Beyer
-7--Thomas R. Saltarelli Leslie A. Pontious
7--Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth
James A. Wahner _James Ferryman
DISTRICT N0. 2: x Henry W. Wedaa, Chairman John M. Gullixson
x John Collins, Chairman pro tan —George Scott
-7—Fred Barrera —_Gene Beyer
7--Buck Catlin _Chris Norby
x Barry Danes _Bob Bell
x W1111am D. Mahoney _James H. Flora
x Garrey J. Nelson Glenn Parker
x Arthur G. Newton —John 0. Tynes
xlry Pickier —_Fred Hunter
x Miguel Pultdo-7--Roger Stanton _Don R. Roth
%George L. Zlaket _Norman Culver
DISTRICT NO. 3: x Sal A. Sapien, Chairman Harry M. Dotson
Burnie Dunlap. Chairmen pro tan x Carrey J. Nelson
x Buck Catlin Chris Norby
x John Collins —George Scott
x Norman Culver —_Robert H. Main
x James V. Evans _Margie L. Rice
James H. Flora William D. Mahoney
x Don R. Griffin —_Rhonda J. McCune
x Frank Laszlo Gwen A. Forsythe
Pat-MaGulgan A Robert Richardson
x Eva G. Miller _Larry Herman
x Richard Partin _Cecilia L. Age
x Iry Pickier _Fred Hunter
x Jim Silva _Earle Robita111e
xRoger Stanton Don R. Roth
charles Sylvia —Ronald Bates
DISTRICT N0. 5: x Ruthelyn Plumper, Chairman Evelyn Hart
—Phil Sansone, Chairman pro tem x John C. Cox, Jr.
x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 6: x James A. Wanner, Chairman _Dick Sherrick
x Evelyn Hart, Chatrmmn pro tam Ruthelyn Plummer
Don R. Roth —Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 7: x Charles E. Puckett, Chairman _Thomas R. Saltarelli
xJames A. Wahner, Chairman pro tem Nate Reade
xFred Barrera —_Gene Beyer
John C. Cox, Jr. Ruthelyn Plummer
a Robert Richardson _Miguel Pulido
x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
_6oi-iy-Anaa-6heWoan x Barry Hammond
DISTRICT NO. 11: x Grace Winchell, Chairman Linda Moulton-Patterson
xJim Silva —Don MacAllister
x Roger Stanton —Don R. Roth
DISTRICT NO. 13: x John M. Gullixson, Chairman Henry W. Wedaa
x Fred Barrera, Chat nman pro in —Gene Beyer
=Glenn Parker —Burnie Dunlap
xiry Pickier —Fred Hunter
x Don R. Roth _Roger Stanton
DISTRICT NO. 14: x Pear A. Swan. Chairmen Darryl Miller
x Llalie A. Pontious, Chairman pro ten —Charles E. Puckett
x Fred Barrera —_Gene Beyer
Don R. Roth Roger Stanton
_6aiiY-MMe-NraPidan x Barry Hammond
_Z_
11/18/92
STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Wayne Sylvester, General Manager,
Blake P. Anderson, Thomas M. Dawes,
Gary G. Streed, Penny Kyle, Assistant
Board Secretary, Corrine Clawson,
Dan Dillon, Patti Gorczyca,
Gary Hasenstab, David Heinz,
Ed Hodges, John Kavoklis, John Linder,
Margie Nellor, Bob Ooten,
Gregg Pamson, Jeffrey Reed,
Mary Simpson, Ed Torres, Jack Vincent,
Chuck Winsor
OTHERS PRESENT: Thomas L. Woodruff, General Counsel ,
Phil Brisell , Mrs. Norman Culver,
Jamel Demir, Walt Howard, Harvey Hunt,
Bill Knopf, Mary Lee, Paul
Shoenberger, Ron Smith, Phil Stone
x x x x x x x x x x x x x
DISTRICT 2 & 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excerpt
re Board appointments That the minute excerpt from the
Garden Grove Sanitary District
re appointment of alternate Directors, and seating new members of the
Boards, be, and is hereby, received and ordered filed as follows:
District Active Director Alternate Director
2 George L. Zlaket Sheldon S. Singer*
3 Sheldon S. Singer* George L. Zlaket
* Appointment to be effective 11/30/92
DISTRICT it Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive and file minute excerpt
re Board appointments That the minute excerpt from the
City of Huntington Beach
re appointment of alternate Directors, be, and is hereby, received and
ordered filed as follows: (* Mayor)
Active Director Alternate Director
Jim Silva* Don MacAllister
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman briefly reviewed
Presentation of PRIDE Awards to the Districts' PRIDE program which
employees rewards employees for creative
suggestions with an economic benefit
to the Districts. He reported that at its last meeting, the Fiscal Policy
Committee approved 15 PRIDE cost-saving or safety suggestion awards to
employees totaling $9,123.00.
-3-
11/18/92
Chairman Mahoney then asked Bob Ooten, Assistant Director of Operations, to
come forward and assist in the presentations of the three $1,500.00 awards
(maximum award amount) to employees David Heinz, John Kavoklis and Jeffrey
Reed. Mr. Ooten reported that David Heinz' suggestion, resulting in reduced
electrical power requirements and more efficient utilization of the
equipment, is estimated to save approximately $80,000.00 per year. John
Kavoklis'suggestion, resulting in a reduction of chemicals, could save the
Districts $44,400.00 per year. Jeffrey Reed's suggestion, resulting in
discontinuing usage of the pumps at Ellis Avenue Pump Station, will save the
Districts an estimated $26,000.00 per year.
The Joint Chairman commended the employees for their PRIDE suggestions and
presented them with their $1,500 cash awards.
ALL DISTRICTS Chairman Mahoney recognized Districts'
Presentation of service in to employee, Gregg Pamson, for 35 years
District employeeUri
gg Pamson of outstanding service to the
Districts. Over the years Mr. Pamson
has served the Districts in several capacities, including head of the
laboratory division. His time is now devoted to operational research. His
work has contributed significantly to the effectiveness and efficiency of
the Districts' operations.
He then presented Mr. Pamson with a plaque recognizing his 35 years of
service.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman announced that
Adoption of resolutions of several Directors had recently retired
appreciation for retiring Directors from the Boards. Chairman Mahoney
then introduced resolutions expressing
the Boards' appreciation to those retiring Directors.
It was then moved, seconded and carried by unanimous acclamation:
That the Boards of Directors hereby adopt the following resolutions
expressing their appreciation to the retiring Directors and recognizing
their outstanding contributions and dedication to public service:
Resolution No. Director City/Agency District
92-154 Norman E. Culver Garden Grove 3
Sanitary District
92-168 Dan Griset Santa Ana 1
92-169 Pat McGuigan Santa Ana 1
92-170 Bob Main Garden Grove 2
Sanitary District
92-171 Arthur Newton Placentia 2
92-172 Ruthelyn Plummer Newport Beach 5
92-173 Sally Anne Sheridan Irvine 7 8 14
-4-
11/18/92
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these
minutes.
Joint Chairman Mahoney added that plaques were being prepared and would be �✓
formally presented to each of these Directors at a future meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman and Vice Joint
Presentation of resolution of Chairman presented a plaque and
appreciation and plaque to resolution of appreciation to
reti rim Director Norman E. Culver retiring Director No roan E. Culver,
for years of service who had represented the Garden Grove
Sanitary District on the Board of
Directors since October 1962. Chairman Mahoney commented that Mr. Culver,
on the Board of Directors for 30 years, had served as the Joint Chairman,
District No. 3 Chairman and has been the Chairman of the Building Committee
since its inception.
Directors Don Rath and Roger Stanton also recognized Mr. Culver's
outstanding service and presented a momenta from the County of Orange.
The General Manager then presented a momenta from the Districts' staff to
retiring Director Culver.
Mr. Culver expressed his appreciation to the Directors and staff for the
recognition. He then commented on the many changes that have occurred
during his term on the Boards.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman welcomed
Presentation of District pins to newly-seated Director George Zlaket
Directors and alternate Director Barry Hammond
to the Boards. He then presented pins
bearing the Districts' logo to Directors Zlaket and Hammond. The pins are
similar to the service pins given to employees and recognize the Directors
for their service on the Board of the Sanitation Districts.
ALL DISTRICTS - Joint Chairman Mahoney regretfully
Report of the Joint Chairman announced the passing of Director
Jack Kelly who represented the City
of Huntington Beach. He announced that the Districts would adjourn this
meeting in Director Kelly' s honor and memory.
He then announced that the Ad HOC Committee for Service to Outside Areas
would meet on Thursday, November 19th, at 4:30 p.m.
It was further announced that the Fiscal Policy Committee would meet on
Thursday, November 19th, at 5:30 p.m.
Chairman Mahoney also called a Joint Works Selection Committee meeting to be
held on Monday, November 30th, at 8:00 a.m.
ALL DISTRICTS Mr. Sylvester gave a special thanks
Report of the General Manager to staff members Anna Ubaldini and
Eunice Kizziah who baked and
decorated the cakes in recognition of retiring Director Norman E. Culver.
-5- �.✓
' 11/18/92
He then reported on the SWAP reversal relative to the Series B Certificates
of Participation issue which was effectively accomplished on election day
due to a lot of activity in the market. He then asked the Director of
Finance to review the transaction.
Mr. Streed then stated that early in the morning on election day there was
favorable activity in the market. The financial manager, Patti Gorcyzka,
prevailed upon Merrill Lynch and concluded the transaction. The total
earnings for the last 1W years is $6.9 million. He stated that the Fiscal
Policy Committee would be receiving a more detailed report on this
transaction at their next meeting.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Counsel briefly commented
Report of the General counsel on his annual report on the status of
various litigation matters that was
Included in the Directors' agenda package.
He also announced that later in the meeting the Boards would be adjourning
to a closed session to review various issues.
DISTRICT 1 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
adjourned regular meeting held
November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 2 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
`..r✓ adjourned regular meeting held
November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 3 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
adjourned regular meeting held
November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 5 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
adjourned regular meeting held
November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 6 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
adjourned regular meeting held
November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 7 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
adjourned regular meeting held
November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed
�...� approved, as mailed.
-6-
11/18/92
DISTRICT 11 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
adjourned regular meeting held
November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 13 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
adjourned regular meeting held
November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
DISTRICT 14 There being no corrections or
Approval of Minutes amendments to the minutes of the
adjourned regular meeting held _
November 18, 1992, the Chairman ordered that said minutes be deemed
approved, as mailed.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Ratification of payment of aint
and Individual District Claims That payment of Joint and individual
District claims set forth on pages
"A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of these minutes, and summarized
below, be, and are hereby, ratified by the respective Boards in the amounts
so indicated.
10/07/92 10/21/92
ALL DISTRICTS
Joint Operating Fund - $ 509,266.57 $1,046,825.28
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund - 1,197,111.28 1,815,355.25
Joint Working Capital Fund - 127,164.09 162,949.23
Self-Funded Insurance Funds - 103,318.25 84,269.12
DISTRICT NO. 1 - 5,403.35 59,850.89
DISTRICT NO. 2 - 28,273.17 605,423.84
DISTRICT NO. 3 - 39,355.06 42,436.47
DISTRICT NO. 5 - 29,264.05 89570.11
DISTRICT�N — - 3,324.32 57.31
DISTRICT NO. 7 - 9,551.76 15,831.84
DISTRICT NO. 11 - 8,499.21 6,721.97
DISTRICT NO. 13 - 879.20 -0-
DISTRICT NO. 14 - 8,966.49 319,754.53
DISTRICTS NOS. 5 & 6 JOINT - -0- 1,953.40
DISTRICTS NOS. 6 & 7 JOINT - 3,316.51 -0-
DISTRICTS NOS. 7 & 14 JOINT - 115.47 2 685.87
2,073,808.78 4,172,685.11
-7-
11/18/92
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awardin Purchase of Chlorine in
Bulk, Spec fi cation NO. C-029, to That the Boards of Directors hereby
DX Systems Company adopt Resolution No. 92-155,
receiving and filing bid tabulation
and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Chlorine in Bulk,
Specification No. C-029, to DX Systems Company for the price of $229.40 per
tan, plus sales tax, for a one-year period beginning December 1, 1992, with
provision for four one-year extensions. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding ch Purase of Ferric
Chloride, Specification No. P-136, That the Boards of Directors hereby
to Imperial West Chemical Company adapt Resolution No. 92-156,
receiving and filing bid tabulation
and recommendation and awarding contract for Purchase of Ferric Chloride,
Specification No. P-136, to Imperial West Chemical Company, at the unit
price of $204.77 per dry ton, plus sales tax, for a one-year period
beginning December 1, 1992, with provision for four one-year extensions.
Said resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 2 to the
ions and s ecifications for That Change Order No. 2 to the plans
Job Nos. I- an J-22-2 and specifications for Interplant
Pipeline and Utility Corridor, Job
No. I-9, and Replacement of Portion of Standby Ocean Outfall , Job
No. J-22-2, authorizing an addition of $212,764.00 to the contract with
Colich Bros. , Inc. dba Colich and Sons for six items of additional work, and
granting a time extension of seven calendar days for completion of said
additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Director Collins requested that
Approving Change Order No. 15 to Items 2, 3 and 4 of this change order
the plans and specifications for be re-negotiated with the design
Job No. J-19-1 engineer for reimbursement of said
items.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 15 to the plans and specifications for Central Power
Generation System at Plant No. 1, Job No. J-19-1, authorizing an addition of
$9,758.00 to the contract with Hunter Corporation for four items of
additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
.�.✓
-8-
11/18/92
ALL DISTRICTS Director Collins requested that all
Approving Change Order No. 15 to items except for Item 4 be
plans and specifications for re-negotiated with the design
Job No. J-19-2 engineer for reimbursement of said
items.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That Change Order No. 15 to the plans and specifications for Central Power
Generation System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2, authorizing a
net addition of $75,527.46 to the contract with Brinderson Corporation for
eight items of added or deleted work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Change Order No. 14 to
the plans and spec if 1catlons for That Change Order No. 14 to the plans
os Job N . P1-34-1, P1-35-2 and J-21 and specifications for Construction
of Digesters Nos. 11-16 at
Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-34-3; Rehabilitation of Digesters 9 and
10 at Reclamation Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-35-2; and Installation of Waste
Digester Gas Flare Facilities at Plants 1 and 2, Job No. J-21, authorizing a
net addition of $20,044.00 to the contract with Advanco Constructors,
Division of Zurn Constructors, Inc. , for nine items of added or deleted
work, be, and is hereby, approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Grant of Easement to
Southern California Edison Company That the Boards of Directors hereby
for right-of-way re Job No. J-19-2 adopt Resolution No. 92-157,
approving and authorizing execution
of Grant of Easement to Southern California Edison Company for right-of-way
required to operate and maintain Southern California Edison's substation at
Plant No. 2 to accommodate the interconnection of Central Power Generation
System at Treatment Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2. Said resolution, by
reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS The Joint Chairman recognized the
Verbal Report on the National Districts' representative to the
Water Research Institute NWRI National Water Research Institute
(NWRI) , Director Buck Catlin, for a
report on NWRI activities.
Director Catlin stated that the Districts are one of the five public
agencies that form the NWRI which was formed in 1991. The research work is
funded, on a matching basis, by Joan Irvine Smith. The Institute's goal is
"to identify and support research activities that address water supply and
water quality needs". The Districts and the other four member agencies each
contribute $50,000.00 per year to the program for the administrative costs.
The other agencies involved are the Orange County Water District, Municipal
Water District of Orange County, San Joaquin Basin Authority and Irvine
Ranch Water District.
The Institute has gathered approximately 20 people across the country highly
talented in water technology as advisers. There is also an inter-agency
committee that reviews the role of the institute to keep it on track and
headed in the right direction.
-9-
11/18/92
�i The NWRI has three different types of programs. The research projects are
what the Districts and others are actively involved in now. NWRI grants
money on a matching basis for research to see what can be done toward NWRI' s
water quality goals. The other programs are cooperative programs and
developmental programs.
Director Catlin also used slides with his presentation. He stated that the
Institute is gaining credibility. He reported that Senator Paul Simon
visited NWRI to review its current work and future plans. NWRI is somewhat
unique in that it has not asked for federal monies which is making an
impression across the country and in Washington DC.
Financially NWRI receives $500,000.00 per year from Joan Irvine Smith. NWRI
encourages utilities, power companies, companies interested in water such as
the American Water Research Institute and universities to also make
financial contributions towards the research. The federal government is
also contributing some funds as they have now become interested in the
Institute's projects.
Director Catlin stated that currently there are seven projects that are now
in process, and they all have matching funds.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Receive, file and approve written
reports of the Fiscal Policy That written reports of the Fiscal
Committee and Executive Committee Policy Committee's meeting and
�.✓ Executive Committee's meeting held on
October 21, 1992 and October 28, 1992, respectively, be, and are hereby,
received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions relative to Biofiltration
Demonstration Project
Authorizing staff to conduct Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Biofiltration Demonstration Project
That staff be, and is hereby,
authorized to conduct Biofiltration Demonstration Project to study the
performance of biofilters for treating toxic, volatile organic and
odorous compounds from Districts' off-gases.
Authorizing the General Manager Moved, seconded and duly carried:
to execute an agreement with u5C
Tor services needed for That the agreement with USC for
Biofiltration Demonstration Project services needed for the
Biofiltration Demonstration
Project, be, and is hereby, approved in an amount not to exceed
$80,800.00; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized
to execute said agreement in form approved by the General Counsel .
-10-
11/18/92
Authorizing staff to secure the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
sere ces of construction
contractors to construct the That staff be, and is hereby,
necessary support facilities to authorized to secure the services
conduct pilot testing of construction contractors in
accordance with established
procurement procedures, to construct the necessary support facilities
to conduct pilot testing of the Biofiltration Demonstration Project.
Authorizing staff to secure the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
services of contract analytical
laboratories to conduct the That staff be, and is hereby,
necessary testing authorized to secure the services
of contract analytical
laboratories, in accordance with established procurement procedures,
to conduct the necessary testing relative to the Biofiltration
Demonstration Project.
Authorizing the General Manager to Moved, seconded and duly carried:
execute a Grant Agreement with
South Coast Air Qualit Management That the General Manager be, and
District S AQMD for partial is hereby, authorized to execute
funding a Grant Agreement with South
Coast Air Quality Management
District (SCAQMD) for partial funding of the Biofiltration
Demonstration Project in the amount of $124,568.00.
Authorizing the General Manager to
execute a Grant Agreement with Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Water Environment Research
Foundation TWERFT for partial That the General Manager be, and
funding is hereby, authorized to execute
a Grant Agreement with Water
Environment Research Foundation (WERF) for partial funding of the
Biofiltration Demonstration Project in the amount of $50,000.00.
ALL DISTRICTS Director Norman Culver, Chairman of
Receive, file and approve written the Building Committee, invited the
report of the Building Committee Directors to make arrangements with
staff and tour the new laboratory
facility.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the written report of the Building Committee meeting held on
October 29, 1992, be, and is hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
-11-
11/18/92
ALL DISTRICTS
�...� Actions relative to Operations
Center Expansion at Plant No. 2,
Job No. P2-23-5-1
Approving Addendum No. 1 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
,61nas and specifications for Job
N . P2-23-5-1 That Addendum No. 1 to the plans
and specifications for Operations
Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1, making
miscellaneous technical modifications, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Addendum No. 2 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
plans and specifications for Job
No. P2-23-5-1 That Addendum No. 2 to the plans
and specifications for Operations
Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1, changing the date
for receipt of bids from September 29, 1992 to October 6, 1992, and
making miscellaneous technical modifications, be, and is hereby,
approved.
Rejecting all bids for Job Moved, seconded and duly carried:
No. P2-23-5-1
That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-158, receiving and filing bid
tabulation and recommendation and rejecting all bids for Operations
Center Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1; and,
FURTHER MOVED: That the General Manager be, and is hereby, authorized
to establish the date for receipt of bids for Operations Center
Expansion at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-23-5-1 (Rebid) . Said resolution,
by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
Director Don Griffin requested that his vote in opposition to the
motion be made a matter of record.
ALL DISTRICTS General Counsel reported to the
General Counsel Is Comments Prior to Directors of the need for a closed
Closed Session session as authorized by Government
Code Section 54956.9 to review:
1) Request for authorization to initiate litigation against the
manufacturer and general contractor an Districts' two jobs relating to
the co-generation internal combustion engines.
2) A proposed settlement of litigation entitled, United States
Government vs. Montrose Chemical Company, County Sanitation Districts.
3) A proposed settlement agreement with Cherry Textron in regards to
violation of wastewater discharge limits contained in Permit
No. 1-1-330.
-12-
11/18/92
REVISED
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried: l I
Convene in closed session ursuant �d
to overnment ode Section The Boards convened in closed
54956.9 session at 8:28 p.m. pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9.
Confidential Minutes of the Closed Session held by the Board(s) of Directors
have been prepared in accordance with California Government Code Section
54957.2 and are maintained by the Board Secretary in the Official Book of
Confidential Minutes of Board and Committee Closed Meetings.
ALL DISTRICTS At 9:32 p.m. the Boards reconvened in
Reconvene in regular session regular session.
ALL DISTRICTS
Actions re Central--Power Generation
System at Plan No. , ob
No. J-19-2
Approving Settlement Agreement with Moved, seconded and duly carried:
C-B Reci rocatin , Energy Services
croup, and Brinderson corporation That the Boards of Directors
re Job No. J-19-2 hereby adopt Resolution
No. 92-174, approving Settlement
Agreement relative to Electrical Equipment Purchase Contract, Job
No. J-19A and Construction Agreement, Job No. J-19-2, between the
Districts, C-B Reciprocating, Energy Services Group, an unincorporated
division of Cooper Industries, Inc., and Brinderson Corporation, in
form approved by the General Counsel , and authorize the General
Manager and Board Secretary to execute said agreement. Said
resolution, by reference hereto, is hereby made a part of these
minutes.
A rovin A reement with Brinderson Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Corporation re Job o. That the Boards of Directors
hereby adopt Resolution No. 92-175, approving Agreement between the
Districts and Brinderson Corporation pertaining to completion of work
for Construction Agreement, Job No. J-19-2, in form approved by the
General Counsel , and authorize the General Manager and Board Secretary
to execute said agreement. Said resolution, by reference hereto, is
hereby made a part of these minutes.
A rovin Chan a Order No. 16 to Moved, seconded and duly carried:
he plans and spec fications for
Job NO. -19-2 That Change Order No. 16 to the
plans and specifications for
Central Power Generation System at Plant No. 2, Job No. J-19-2,
authorizing an addition of $317,000 to the contract with Brinderson
Corporation, for lube oil piping revisions and other filters, be, and
is hereby, approved.
-13- �/
11/18/92
REVISED
Authorizing staff to engage Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Advanced Engine Technologies
Corporation to conduct forensic That staff be, and is hereby,
evaluation of the engine problems authorized to engage Advanced
and to oversee the repair Engine Technologies Corporation
to conduct forensic evaluation of
the engine problems and to oversee the repair, in an amount not to
exceed $136,000.
Authorizing staff to engage Moved, seconded and duly carried:
outside laboratory services to
conduct forensic testing That staff be, and is hereby,
authorized to engage outside
laboratory services to conduct forensic testing in a total amount not
to exceed $215,000.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and unanimously
Authorizing consideration of carried:
Supplemental Agenda item relative
to the Annual Autlit Report submitted That the Boards of Directors do
by KPMG Peat Marwick, Main 8 Company hereby authorize consideration of
supplemental agenda item relative to
the Annual Audit Report submitted by KPMG Peat Marwick, Main 8 Company which
was not posted 72 hours prior to the Board meeting date.
ALL DISTRICTS The General Manager reported that the
Receive and file Annual Audit Annual Audit Report submitted by KPMG
Report submitted by KPMG Peat Peat Marwick, Main 8 Company was
V..� Marwick, Main 8 Company, Certified reviewed by the Fiscal Policy
Public Accountants Committee at the October 21st
meeting, as reflected in their report
to the Boards that had been received, filed and approved as part of a
separate item earlier in the agenda. However, consideration of the audit
report by the full Boards had been inadvertently omitted from the
November 18th agenda listing. Mr. Sylvester reported that the auditor had
sent the reports to the Directors by overnight mail on November 17th. He
further stated that a requirement in the Districts' Certificate of
Participation indentures is that this report be approved by the Boards by
the end of November.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried:
That the Annual Audit Report submitted by KPMG Peat Marwick, Main 8 Company,
Certified Public Accountants, for the year ending June 30, 1992, be, and is
hereby, received, ordered filed and approved.
ALL DISTRICTS Moved, seconded and unanimously
Authorizing consideration of carried:
Supplemental Agenda item relative
to Refunding Certificates of That the Boards of Directors do
Participation, IV92 Series hereby authorize consideration of
supplemental agenda item relative to
Refunding Certificates of Participation, 1992 Series, which was not posted
72 hours prior to the Board meeting.
-14-
11/18/92
REVISED
DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 8 11
Actions re Supplemental Agenda Item
relative to Refunding Certificates
of Participation, 1992 Series
Verbal staff report The General Manager reported that
last month the Directors
authorized a refunding of the 1986 COP issue and a portion of the 1991
Series B issue, designated Refunding Certificates of Participation,
1992 Series. Bond counsel has since determined that an additional
Board action is necessary before that transaction can be finalized.
He then asked Gary Streed, Director of Finance, to further brief the
Directors.
Mr. Streed stated that the Bond counsel has recommended modifications
to resolutions adopted at the last Board meeting. The liquidity
agreement will now include an irrevocable letter of credit. He
further stated that bond counsel determined the Districts would be in
a much better position regarding the tax exempt status of these COPS
if the Boards were to take an action identifying and stating there
will be some cost savings involved with this transaction. Mr. Streed
further reported that due to the Financial Manager's perseverance, the
Districts were already able to lock in the interest rate of an
extremely favorable 5.55% on the transaction. The results will be a
gross savings to the Districts of approximately $7.0 million.
Approving Resolutions pertaining to Moved, seconded and duly carried
Refunding Certificates of by each respective District:
Participation, 1992 Series
That its Board of Directors
hereby adopts the following resolution approving matters concerning
Refunding Certificates of Participation Financing pursuant to
Districts' adopted long-range financial plan:
DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO.
1 92-161-1
2 92-162-2
3 92-163-3
5 92-164-5
6 92-165-6
7 92-166-7
11 92-167-11
Said resolutions, by reference hereto, are hereby made a part of these
minutes.
DISTRICT 1 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned in memory of
Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992.
-15- "`
11/18/92
REVISED
DISTRICT 2
Actions re Portion of Euclid
Interceptor Sewer. between Broadway
and Orangethorpe Avenue including
City of Anaheim Street
Improvements) , Contract No. 2-26-3;
Katella Relief Sewer, between
Euclid Street and Walnut Street
Ninth Street) , Contract No. 2-2B;
and Orangewood Diversion Street,
Contract No. 2-29
Approving Change Order No. 8 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
plans and specifications for
Contract Nos. 2-26-3, 2-28 and 2-29 That Change Order No. 8 to the
plans and specifications for said
project, authorizing an addition of $29,774.00 to the contract with
Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for one item of additional work, and
granting a time extension of 128 calendar days for completion of said
additional work, be, and is hereby, approved.
Approving Change Order No. 9 to the Moved, seconded and duly carried:
ions and s ec ifications for
Contract Nos. -26-3, 2-28 and 2-29 That Change Order No. 9 to the
plans and specifications for said
project, authorizing a net deduction of $94,677.50 from the contract
with Steve Bubalo Construction Co. for an adjustment of engineer' s
quantities, be, and 1s hereby, approved.
Accepting Contract Nos. 2-26-3, Moved, seconded and duly carried:
2-28 and 2-29 as complete
That the Board of Directors
hereby adopts Resolution No. 92-159-2, accepting said contract as
complete, authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion and
approving Final Closeout Agreement. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 2 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2 be adjourned in memory of
Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992.
DISTRICT 3 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned in memory of
Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992.
-16-
11/18/92
REVISED
DISTRICT 5 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment �.✓
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned in memory of
Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992.
DISTRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 be adjourned in memory of
Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Approving Grant of Easement to
Southern California Edison Comp-any Comp-any That the Board of Directors hereby
for right-of-way re Contract adopts Resolution No. 92-160-7,
No. 7-11-2 approving and authorizing execution
of a Grant of Easement to Southern
California Edison Company for right-of-way required to operate and maintain
voltage transformer and conduits necessary to provide electrical service to
Michelson Pump Station, Contract No. 7-11-2. Said resolution, by reference
hereto, is hereby made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned in memory of
Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992.
DISTRICT 11 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned in memory of
Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992.
DISTRICT 13 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 13 be adjourned in memory of
Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9:34 p.m. , November 18, 1992.
-17-
11/18/92
REVISED
�./ DISTRICT 14 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 14 be adjourned in memory of
Director Jack Kelly. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
9.34 p.m., November 18, 1992.
AaC'
ss s ant r to of a Boards
of Direct o ofCbdnty Sanitation
Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11,
13 and 14
� -18-
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WINNING CAPITAL FROCESSING DATE lu/ul/92 PAGE 1
REPORT
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY NUMBER AP 9f
CLAIMS PAID 1010192 POSTING DATE 1./07/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
125OC4 AMERICAN TELEPHONE L TELLGAAPN f1.501.01 ' LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICES
125005 ACCU-LABS RESEARCH INC 350.0U I" SERVICES
125006 ACTION RENTALS S1.844.25
125007 ADVANCO CONSTRUCTORS INC 347u.125.06 RENTAL CONSTRUCTION
EQUIPMENT
125008 AIR COLD SUPPLY INC 6993.02 CONSTRUCTION PI-33- P PI-35-2, J-21
AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLIES
SY9
125010 AIR SOCIETY
i CHEMICAL 1N il6.EL5.WJ 0B AGREEMENT O%Y GEN STET M.O.8-9-89
125011 AMEN CAN HI-LIFT
OF CIVIL ENGR $
721.68 PUBLICATION
125022 AMERICAN HIOLIF7 3721.8E RENTAL EQUIPMENT
125012 ANYE LL CCRP OR A710N 3390.eY MACHINE PARTS
125013 BLAME P ANDERSON $97.43 CELLULAR TELEPHONE REIMBURSEMENT
125034 ANTHONY PEST CONTROL 3250.06 PEST CONTROL SERVICES
125015 A PLUS SYSTEMS $561.64 NOTICES 6 ADS
125016 ABC LABORATORIES f2.395.u0 SERVICE AGREEMENT
125017 AQUATIC TESTING LABORATORY 41.390.00 LAB SERVICES
12501E ABATE% SERVICES INC $7.529.52 UNIFORM RENTALS
125019 ARIZONA INSTRUMENT $10.601.50 METER
TT7 125020 AURORA PUMP 413u50.60 PUNIP
= 125021 AUTO SHOP EQUIPMENT CO $339.11 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
125022 BC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY INC $3.167.65 ROPE
p0 1250923 BKK LANDFILL 63:167.66 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
125024 BRY IN FE TY L SUPPLY 11J53.96 SAFETY SUPPLIES
125025 BATTERY SFECIALTIES $2.303.67 BATTERIES
125026 BARTER DIAGNOSTICS INC f3.350.30 LAS SUPPLIES
1 125027 BEACON BAY ENTERPRISES INC. 51.575.00 CAR WASH TICKETS
F� 12502E YT DILLARD INC $181.82 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
125929 BOLEN RACIATOR SERVICE 3500.93 TRUCK REPAIRS -
125030 BON A-RUES 991.55 TRUCK REPAIRS
125031 BRENNER FIEDLER L ASSOC IN $1.560.11 MECHANICAL PARTS
125032 BROOMS INSTRUMENT DIY. 11.29T.32 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
125033 BROWN L CALDWELL CONSULTING $53.191.79 ENGINEERING SERVICES J-19
12503A BUILDER-S EMPORIUM 313.54 HARDWARE/LUMBER
125035 BURME' ENGINEERING CO f1.3T6.45 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
125036 BUSH AND ASSUCIATES INC 31.188.uu SURVEYING SERVICES M.O. 6-10-92
125037 GARY 0 STREEO 64.937.10 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT
125038 CHEM HILL $1.821.93 ENGINEERING SERVICES
125039 C M I 3129.39 ELECTRIC PARTS
125040 INC PRESS INC $325.95 LAB SUPPLIES
225041 IS COMPARY $858.47 HARDWARE
125042 1992 CWPCA ERIC f510.06 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
125043 CAL SOUTF EQUIPMENT CO $273.38 INSTRUMENT PARTS
125044 CALTROL INC $29.69 REGULATOR PARTS
125045 CALIF ASSOC OF SAN AfiENCIE f935.u0 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION
225046 CALIFORNIA PIPE FABRICATORS 675.u0 REFUND PLANS R SPECS FEES
125047 CALIF WOCOYORKING MACHINERY 6433.15 SAFETY SUPPLIES
12501E JOHN CAMILLO ENGINEERS 5123.376.51 ENGINEERING SERVICES PI-36, PI-38
125E00/19 CENTURY SAFETY INS7 L SUPP $8.637.35 SAFETY SUPPLIES
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST VCRKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/ul/91 PAGE 2
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID lu/47I92 POSTING DATE 34/u1/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
125050 CHEM FRO LABORATORY INC $36..uu LAB SERVICES
125051 CHEVRON USA INC. 1969.8E PETROLEUM SUPPLIES
125052 COAST AFPLIANCE PARTS - $80.42 ELECTRIC PARTS
125053 COASTAL CHLORINATION 6240.04 CHLORINATION PARTS
125054 COLE FARMER INSTRUMENT CO 5512.13
LAB PUBLICATION
N9
125056 COLLEGE PLACEMENT COUNCIL 5220.00 PUBLICATION
125057 COMPRESSOR COMPONENTS OF CA $268.14 MACHINE 9UPPLIE9
125059 COMPUTER INC. 8268.1. COMPUTER SERVICES/NARDXARe
12505E CONNELLRYE 290.00 COMPUTER SERVICES
125059 CONSOLI UM PARES / DIY $200.03 TRUCE PARTS
12506E CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL N19T - l5.718.63 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
125062 CONTINENTAL AIR TOOLS INC 43.232.50 TOOLS
125063 CONVERSE AL CHECONSULTANTS
CO lS r232.50 ECHLORINENGINEER N.0.ERVICE
125064 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS N C Se60.L9 COMPRESSOR
SERVICES
225065 COUNTY WHOLESALES INC f3$929.13 ELECTRIC P PARTS
TT7 125066 STATE
WHOLESALE ELECTRIC 5929.13 ELECTRIC PARTS
X 125067 STATE OF CALIFORNIA .141.55 PROCESSING FEE -SERVICES
PATIO-
S 125068 DAMES f MTIRE lB$124.32 BNGINHHRING SERVICES P1-38-3
12506E DANIELS TIRE SERVICE $431.66 GAUGE
bO 125070 MEK/GEEKER $199.71 GAUGE
12507E DE GUCLLE [ SONS GLASS CO .944.85 0LA99
125072 DELL COMPUTER CORP fI5.999.85 COMPUTER HARDWAKE
� 125072 DEW PAP SALES [ SERVICE 3199.03 BLeCTRIC PARTS
N 1250i3 OEZURIK AND/OR CS CO 51.230.63 VALVES
12S Oi9 DIALOG 1NFOR RATION SERVICES - S34.DO COMPUTER SOFTWARE
125075 DIATEC ENVIRONMENTAL $1.751.92 ANIONIC POLYMER M.0.8-12-92
125076 OIFILIPPO ASSOCIATES $247.29 PRINTING
125077 DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP 5399.0Y SERVICE AGREEMENT
12507A DORADO EATERPRISLS INC *24.020.00 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 REPAIRS
125079 DURO-SENSE CORP 5924.32 INSTRUMENT PARTS
125080 ERE TECHNOLOGIES 5250.00 INSTRUMENT PARTS
125082 EASTMAN INC $7.977.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES
125082 ELECTRD•TEST INC $366.46 ELECTRIC PARTS
125083 ENCHANTER INC 44.480.00 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-30-92
125084 PKM . COPIER PRODUCTS $164.a3 OFFICE SUPPLIES
125085 FST SAND AND GRAVEL INC 5236.12 ROAD BASE MATERIALS
12l086 FALCON DISPOSAL SERVICE S5.98U.00 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
125087 JOHN B FALKENSTEIN PE f3.900.04 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9. 1-16
12508E FEDERAL EMPRESS CORP 1178.0u AIR FREIGHT
125069 FERRELLGAS $76.55 - PROPANE
125090 FILTER SUPPLY CO $453.43 PIMP PARTS
125091 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURA f350.0u PUBLICATION
125092 FISCHER L FONTEA CO $2.176.69 CHLORINATION PARTS
125093 FISHER SCIENTIFIC CO 1948.65 LAB SUPPLIES
12509E FISONS INSTRUMENTS - $219.82 LAB SUPPLIES
125095 FLO-SYSTEMS 91.394.61 PUMP PARTS
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL - PROCESSING DALE l0/41/92 PAGE 3
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNIV SANITATION UISIRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1J/67/92 POSTING RATE la 07/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
125096 FLUORAMICS INC s1B0.52 CHLORINATION SUPPLIES
125097 FORMA SCIENTIFIC. INC. $3.496.96 INSTRUMENT
125090 CLIFFORD A FORMLRT $27.307.03 SURVEYING SERVICES M.O.6-10-92
125099 FOUNTAIN VALLEY CAMERA s1Bl.B6 FILM
125I00 CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY $3.606.54 WATER USE
125101 FOUNTAIN VALLEY FAINT $234.64 PAINT SUPPLIES
1251L2 FOR ENTERPRISES S3.650.Wu SAFETY CONSULTANT
125103 FOX INDUSTRIAL SALES 978.54 FITTINGS
125106 THE FOXBORO CO $872.58 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
125105 GET. INC. $706.W1 OFFICE SUPPLIES
125166 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO $3.951.69 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL
125147 GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. $1,973.81 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
125188 GENERAL TELEPHONE CO $3.654.37 TELEPHONE SERVICES
195190 GIERLICH-MITCHELL INC s3.659.80 MECHANICAL PARTS
125110 GRAMAM G JAMES S843.25 LEGAL SERVICES H.O.8-14-91
ITT 125111 WU GRAINGER INC $333.14 ELECTRIC PARTS
125112 GRAPHIC DISTRIBUTORS $2.292.32 PNOTD SUPPLIES
= 125113 DON GREEK 0 ASSOCIATES S16 H72.JV SURVEY SERVICES H.O.6-10-92
125119 MACH CONFANY 91.696.0 LAB SUPPLIES
125115 MATCH A KIRK INC $719.37 INSTRUMENT PARTS
125116 PL MAIN CO INC 6136.69 FILTER
1P5117 HELPMATES TEMPORARY SERVICES s1.37T.2u TEMPORARY SERVICES
a125118 HOERBIGER CVS CALIF INC SIr416.23 COMPRESSOR PARTS
LN 125119 J.T. HORVATN s ASSOC. S3.u00.00 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-23-1, J-17
129120 RS ,OGRES CO INC $1,376.62 PAINT SUPPLIES
125121 HUNTER CORPORATION $188.260.74 CONSTRUCTION J-19-1
125122 MUNTINbTON BEACH RUBBER SIX $352.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES
125123 HUNTINGTON VALLEY SCHWINN C $150.74 BICYCLE PARTS
125124 IBM CORP/PC BOONS L SPECIA $587.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES
125125 INFERIAL WEST CHEMICAL s25.78J.51 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-14-90
125126 INDUSTRIAL FRACASES PRODUCTS $896.25 CONNECTORS
125127 INFOIRIEVE 425.5o PUBLICATION
125128 INGRAM PAPER 1191.79 PAPER
125129 INLAND EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO. $135.47 TRUCK PARTS
12SI38 INTEGRATED BUSINESS INT. INC s54.547.46 OFFICE FURNITURE M.O.0-8-92
125131 J G GLASS CORPORATION $1,361.53 REFUND PLAN CHECK BALANCE
195132 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP s1.b35.39 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
125133 JAY-S CATERING $275.91 DIRECTORS• MEETING EXPENSES
125134 JENSEN INSTRUMENTS CO S1.429.26 GAUGE
125135 JM JOHNSOK GENERAL CCNTR s1.950.0O CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 3-17
125136 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 9139.13 ELECTRIC PARTS
125137 JONES CHEMICALS INC 35.980.87 CHEMICALS
125136 JONES INDUSTRIAL HARDWARL C 5685.51 HARDWARE
125139 NALLEEN.S COMPUTER PRODUCTS $119.66 PUBLICATION
125140 KEENAN s ASSOCIATES S2.475.u4 SAFETY SUPPLIES
125141 KELLY SEPVICES SSu.16 TEMPORARY SERVICES
FUND NO 9199 • JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL PROCLSSING DATE lW/ul/92 PAGE
REPORT NUMBER AP45
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE CO UNIT
CLAIMS PAID 16/67/92 POSTING DATE lU/ul/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
125142 KING BEARING INC S1.5J8.47 MACHINE SUPPLIER
125143 KNOA INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 66.J15.29 PIPING
125144 MARTIN KOROICK SR 33.146.Bu CONSTRUCTION SERVICES I-9
125145 LA LIQUID HANDLING SYSTEMS $102.71 PUMP PARTS
125146 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CO 198.38 LAB SUPPLIES
125147 LAWTRONIK $161.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES
1251,48 LEGI TECH 3275.04 COMPUTER SERVICES
125149 LIEBERT CORPORATION S4.u80.53 INSTRUMENT REPAIRS
125250 KP LINDSTROM INC $4.205.67 CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL
125151 ARTHUR 0 LITTLE. INC $54.18 PUBLICATION
12S152 LOCAL AGENCY 44.V00.Ou LAFCO PROCESSING FEE
125153 SJCO -LYNCh COOP $128.58 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
125154 MBC APPLIED ENVIRONMENTAL $933.33 OCEAN MONITORING
125155 MDT 81OLCGIC COMPANY $245.76 SERVICE AGREEMENT
125156 NPS 3308.6V PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
m 125157 MACOMCO $133.78 SERVICE AGREEMENT
X 125258 NA6NETEK NATIONAL ELECTRIC $1.325.23 PUMP PARTS
s 125159 MARVAC ELECTRONICS 431.56 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
125160 MATT CHLOR INC 32.JDB.lu CHLORINATION PARTS
125161 MCKINLEY EQUIFMLNI CORP 376.37 TRUCK PARTS
--1 125162 MECHANICAL DRIVES CO $54.99 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
n 125163 MESA CONSOLIDATED WATER $11.661.09 WATER CONSERVATION PROJECT
125164 MICROAGE OF CERRITOS $108.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARE/HARDWARE
F 125165 MIDWAY MFG A MACHINING 314.474.13 IMPELLER
125166 MILLTRONICS 33.069.78 INSTRUMENT PARTS
125167 MISCO 1464.56 TAPES
125168 MITCHELL INSTRUMENT CO $107.60 ELECTRIC PARTS
125169 MONITOR PUBLISHING CO 1630.W0 PUBLICATION
126170 JAMES M MONTGOMERY $11.427.09 ENGINEERING SERVICES
125171 MONTGOMERY LASORATORILS 31005.00 LAB SERVICES
125172 MOTION IKDUSTRIES INC $12.35 MECHANICAL PARTS
125173 MULLEN A ASSOC INC S3.297.Su ENGINEERING SERVICES
125174 NASCO WEST INC $249.21 LAB SUPPLIES
125175 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL $69.35 SAFETY FILM RENTAL
125176 NEWARK ELECTRONICS 6598.57 ELECTRIC PARTS
125177 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH $5.94 WATER USE
125178 NORTHWESTERN CARBON $4.278.88 CHEMICALS
125179 NUTECH CORPORATION $21.694.63 LAIR EQUIPMENT
12518P OFFICE ELECTRONICS. INC. $277.29 PAPER
125181 01 CORPORATION $06.25 LAB SUPPLIES
125102 OFFICE PAVILION/INTERIOR RES $99.35 OFFICE FURNITURE REPAIRS
125183 DV SYSTEMS CO 138.183.U6 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91
125184 ORANGE. COUNTY AUTO PARTS C S82.67 TRUCK PARTS
125185 ORANGE COURIER $114.40 COURIER SERVICES
125186 ORANGE VALVE A FITTING CO. S1.335.67 FITTINGS
125187 ORION RESEARCH 3241.0u INSTRUMENT
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WORMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE lu/ul/92 FAGL 5
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1./u7/92 POSTING DATE 1V/U7/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT OESCkIPIION
125188 OXYGEN SERVICE 65.417.77 SPECIALTY GASES
125189 COUNIV OF ORANGL 564.176.Wu USER FEE DATA M.0.11-13-91
125190 CSOOC SELF FUNDED MEDICAL 1 4102.000.00 MEDICAL PREMIUM ADVANCE
125191 PACIFIC SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO $2.103.14 SAFETY SUPPLIES
125192 PACIFIC SELL $226.88 TELEPHONE SERVICES
125193 FACTEL MERIDIAN SYSTEMS 66.6R6.W. TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
125194 PAK WEST 62.106.5. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
125195 PALMIERI. TYLER. WIENER. $1.536.40 LEGAL SERVICES 14-1-1A
125196 PARAGON CAOLL $34.95 CABLE SERVICES
125197 PARAMOUNT TANK INC $434.37 TANK TESTING
125198 PERKIN ELMER CORPORATION $1.927.95 LAB SUPPLIES
125199 PICKWICK PAPER SL13.51 PACKING MATERIALS
125200 PIMA GRO SYSTEMS INC 9217.592.23 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91
125201 PITNEY SCWES $190.51 POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE
325202 PLAINS TRUEVALUE HARDWARE 233.87 HARDWARE
m 125213 POLYMETRICS. INC. $671.75 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
>G 125204 POLYPURE INC 522.252.33 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
= 125205 POSITIVE FORMULATORS. INC. 62R1.76 CHEMICALS
125206 NAROLO PRIMROSE ICE 1252.W0 ICE
195207 PROFESSIONAL TREE CARE $2.225.04 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES
—I 125205 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 65.3J2.50 INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
n 125209 R 6 S AUTOMATION 3150.93 ELECTRIC PARTS
I R5210 CAVALCADE ESCROW CORP 69S.2R2.50 MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM M.O.8-12-92
V1 125211 RPM ELC CIA IC MOTORS 39.171.13 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIRS
125212 PACO MFG. L ENGR. CU 664.4. INSTRUMENT PARTS
125213 RED WING SHOES $576.68 REIRBURSABLE SAFETY SHOES
125214 REDI EXPRESS $28.35 COURIER SERVICES
125215 MCJUNKIN-REPUBLIC SUPPLY s1.005.11 HARDWARE
125216 REMOLD INC. 6112.88 MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
125217 RONAN ENGINEERING CO 41.506.79 ELECTRIC PART
125216 R07ANIUM PRODUCTS CO $284.36 ELSCTRIC SUPPLIES
125229 JOSEPH T RYERSON L SON IN $755.37 STEEL
125220 SATETV KLEEN CORP S1T3.46 PARTS CLEANER
125221 SANDERS HYDROSEEDING 5521.73 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
125222 SANCON ENGINEERING INC $18.000.04 ENGINEERING SERVICES
125223 SANTA FC INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS $900.69 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
125224 DOUG 3ARVIS 5675.06 FIRST AID/CPR TRAINING
125225 SEAVENTORES U.12 J.0. LAB SERVICES
125226 SECURITY SPECIALISTS 6320.0U SECURITY SYSTEM REPAIRS
125227 SHAMROCK SUPPLY 1313.01 HARDWARE
125228 SNURELUCK SALLS s5fi2.52 TOOLS
225229 SIGMA CHEMICAL CO $78.11 LAB SUPPLIES
125230 SKALER. IRC 65U.535.47 LAB SUPPLIES
125231 SKVPARK WALK-IN MEDICAL Cll 61.311.5u PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS
125232 SMITH-EMERY CO 6933.04 SOIL TESTING H.O.7-17-91
125233 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON CO 67..89.99 POWER
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIST WCRKIN6 CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE l0/.1/92 PAGE 6
REPORT NUMBER AP63
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 16/07/92 POSTING DATE 1010192
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
12523E $0 CAL GAS CO 65.66J.33 NATURAL OAS
125235 SOUThERN COUNTIES OIL CO 626.968.E6 DIESEL/UNLBADBD FUEL
125236 SOUVENIR FHOTO 6103.3b PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
125237 SPECIAL PLASTIC SYSTEMS INC Sb2E.0S VALVE PARTS
125238 SPEK INOLSTRIES INC $517.18 LAB SUPPLIES
225239 SPRINGER`VERLAG 6109.1b PUBLICATIONS
1252E0 SRECO FLEXIBLE $73.E6 TRUCK PARTS
1252E1 STARNA CELLS. INC. 631E.77 LAW BUPPLIBS
1252E2 STATEWIDE INSTALLERS S780.0. LAB EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION
125263 STERLING ART 5175.31 OFFICE SUPPLIES
125244 SUMMIT STEEL $1.368.57 STEEL
125265 SUPELCO INC S152.71 LAB SUPPLIES
1252E6 TG SCIENTIFIC GLASS $94.0 LAB SUPPLIES
125267 TIF INSTRUMENTS INC $71.75 ELECTRIC PARTS
125248 IEKDRAULICS $1.071.25 MECHANICAL RBPAIRS
m 1252E9 TELE•CELL. INC $66.26 OPERATING BUPPLIBS
X 125250 CHARLES E TMOMAS S356.22 TRUCK PARTS
= 125251 THOMPSON INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 8571.69 HARDWARE
b~0 125252 TOWS LOCK A SAFE SERVICL $73.E7 LUCK RB-KEYING
121211 TOYD LANDSCAPING CO $4.172.37 CONTRACT GROUNDS966PING M.O.11-13-91
12525E MESTRONICS S1.159.22 INSTRUMENT PARTS
125255 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPPLY 1NL 5667.1E TRUCK PARTS
n 125256 JG TUCKER 6 SOM INC 63.8S7.86 INSTRUMENT PARTS
125257 1M IN INS LABDRAIORIES OF S5.b65.5I SOIL TESTING M.0.7-17-91
125258 UNIT EO CONCRETE DDNPANIts s661.05 CONCRETE
125259 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 5365.6E PARCEL SERVICES
125260 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP $250.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT
125261 MARK D SOBSLY $14.696.75 WATER RESEARCH INSTITUTE M.O.3-11-92
125262 VWR SCIENTIFIC S2.700.19 LAB SUPPLIES
125263 VALIN CORPORATION 5111.59 REGULATOR PARTS
12526E VALLEY CITIES SUPPLY CO Sl,.J3.25 PLUMBING BUPPLIBS
125265 VARIAN ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS $2.695.50 LAB SUPPLIES
125266 VERNE-S PLUMBING $110.00 PLUMBING SBRVICBS
125267 VILLAGE NURSERIES 129E.67 1JNDSGPING SUPPLIES
125268 WEATHER AAO MIND INSTRUMENT $290.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES
125269 WEST COAST INSTRUMENTS 6173.1V INSTRUMENT PARTS
125270 WESCG $217.61 ELECTRIC PARTS
125271 WHESSOL VAREC SB.352.78 VALVE
125272 WHITNEY PACHINERV INC 615..87.77 TRUCK PARTS
125273 MITES SCIENTIFIC 6905.1V LAB SUPPLIES
12527E WORDPERFECT CORP 6156.0E SUBSCRIPTION -
125275 XEROX CBRP $1.594.7. COPIER LHASBS
125276 GEORGE YARDLEY CO SISS.S. VALVE
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 10/0/92 32.W13.098.18
_aaaaaa aaaas vasav
FUND NO 9199 - JT DIRT WORKING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 10/O2/92 PAGE 7
REPORT NUMBER AP43
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 20/07/92 POSTING DATE 10/07/92
SUMMARY AMOUNT
41 OPER FUND $4,723.35
41 CAP FAC FUND 468O.OD
R2 OPER FUND $18,829.38
R2 CAP FAC FOND $9,443.79
X3 OPER FUND $39,355.06
45 OPER FUND $21,305.32
A5 CAP FAC FUND $7,878.73
N6 OPER FUND $3,324.32
E7 OPER FUND $8,363.76
47 CAP FAC FUND $1,188.00
411 OPER FUND $5,201.71
h7 411 CAP FAC FUND $3,297.50
X 013 OPER FUND $879.20
s #24 OPEN FUND $4,250.00
814 CAP FAC FUND $4,726.49
0667 OPER FUND $3,316.51
M7614 OPER FUND $115.47
JT OPER FUND $509,266.57
CORP $1,197,111.20
SELF FUNDED INSURANCE FUNDS $103,318.25
V JT DIST WORKING CAPITAL FUND $127,164.09
------
$2,073,808.78
FUND NO 91V9 - JT DIST WLRMINb CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE 1.114/92 PAGE 1
REPORT NUMULN AP43
LEUhTV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE. COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1.121192 POSTING DATE lu/21/92
VARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
1253.1 AG TECH CONPANV Al A9.b35.G1 'RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
1253L2 ACTION RENTALS 9385.51 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
1253u3 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES $970.71 LAB SUPPLIES
12b3A AIR FNCULCTS 6 CHEMICAL IN 6Yu.945.04 06N AGREEMENT OYY GBN 8Y8T M.O.8-9-89
1253(5 ALDRICH CHEMICAL CO $83.65 LAB BUPPLI88
125][6 ALHAPWR♦ FOUNLRY CO LTD 64.bbl.b9 HAMMER COVERS
1253.7 ALLIED SUPFLI CO $3.112.16 VALVE
12531)8 AMERICAN FISHEPILS SOCIETY $32.VU PUBLICATION
1253,9 ROBCO INC S/OR APERICAN SEALS 65.811.91 MECHANICAL BUPPLI88
125310 AMERICAN TVFE CULTURE COLLLCTN NJ.Gu PUBLICATION
125311 AMER ICA. WATER WORKS ASSOC. 61.722.Ou LAB BUPPLI88
125312 bIANL F ANDERSON $97.4b REIMBURSEMENT - CELLULAR TELEPHONE
125313 ANIATER • DISTR16GTION 1434.95 OFFICE BUPPLI88
125314 ANTHONV•S MECH A PAChINi. INC. $766.uu MACNINS RBPAIRS/PARTS
125315 ABC LABORATORIES S1.732.50 SERVICE AGREEMENT
,125316 AYUAIIL ILSTINu LABURATONY $1.30W.4W - LAB SERVICES
m 125317 ARMOR VAC SWEEPING SERVICE 572O.b4 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES
x 12531E ASSUCIAIEC SOILS ENbINLLFING $4.313.5. BOIL TESTING
.s., 125319 bKK LANDFILL 64.u21.32 ,RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.10-9-91
w 125326 BAN SAFETY L SUFFLY 51.780.b9 SAFETY BUPPLI88
125321 BANANA OLUEPRI11T S2,976.65 BLUEPRINTING SERVICES
125322 bAk CLAIS LAW FUdLISNLRS S211.0 SUBSCRIPTION
CO 125323 PATTLRY SPECIALTIES 3636.1• BATTERIES
1 125324 bAATER DIAGNOSIICS INC 68.865.ib LAB BUPPLI88
H-' 12b325 VT UILLAPI, INC S522.49 MECHANICAL REPAIRS
125326 bOLSA RADIATOR SERVICE 162A.96 RADIATOR REPAIRS
125327 RON A-RUES $222.33 TRUCK PARTS
12532E THE SONG BUILT $64.99 PUBLICATION
125329 BRITHINEE ELECTRIC 61.JO6.39 MOTOR
125330 STEVE ULBALU CONSTRUCTION LU 582..Bu.bi CONSTRUCTION 2-26-3, 2-28, 2-29
125331 UUUGET JANITORIAL 31.d5 J.uu JANITORIAL SERVICES
125332 EUILDLP-S EMPORIUM 524.15 HARDWARE -
125333 THE BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFF S2.210.62 PUBLICATION
125339 GARY 6 SIPLEO S6plb.T3 PETTY GeN REIN13URBEHENT
125335 bb7LLR PAPER COMPANY 11.169.69 OFFICR BUPPLI88
12533b CLFA s75.V. LAB BUPPLI88
125337 Cn2M HILL 59.372.2E ENGINEERING SERVICES
125338 CAL bLASS FOR RESEARCH INC. 5399.97 LAB SUPPLIES
125339 CALTkOL INC 51..67.53 INSTRUMEM PARTS
125340 CAL VLSI LhTLRPRISLS 616.09.73 BOUND ABSORPTICN PANELS P1-38-2
125341 CAPITOL ENGUIMY. INC. - 621.2b OFFICE SUPPLIES
125342 CENTURY SAFETY INST L SUPP 11.932.2b SAFETY SUPPLIES
125343 VICK CLFER INC $611.99 TRUCK PARTS
125349 CHCMICAL LMb16ELRINU $53.9. PUBLICATION
12b195 CHEVRON USA INC 45.898.7a OIL b GREASE
125346 CINCULITING AIR $72J.Yu AIR CONDITIONER PARTS
FUND NO 91S9 JI UIST VCHSINU CAPITAL PNOCLSSING TIME A./14192 PALL 2
RLPUNT NUMbLR AP43
CJUNTV SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGL COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID lu/2l/92 POSTING DAIL 16/21/92
WARRANT NO. VLNDUR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
125397 CLANK COASULTANTS 61.NSU.41 CONSULTING SERVICES
12534R COASTAL CHLORINATION 12.664..: WATER $TOTEM CHLORINATION SERVICES
125319 INC CONS GROUP /89.V. PUBLICATION
125354 COLICh AND SLNS Y7b7.3u7.u. CONSTRUCTION 1-9
125351 COMPRLSSUR COhPONLNIS OF CA SS.G11.39 PUMP PARTS
125352 COMPUSA. I,.C, 61.228.56 COMPUTER SERVICES
125353 CUMPUSLI,VE 614.3e COMPUTER SERVICES
125354 CONuhU•l FHOTOSNAPHV "b9.38 PHOTO BERVICSS
125355 CONNELL UM PARTS / DIV *139.52 TRUCK PARTS
125356 CONSOLIUATLU LLECTHICAL LIST tl..172.46 RLECTRICAL PARTS
125357 CONSGLIDAIEL VLASTICS CO 682.6J LAB BUPPLIRS
125358 CONIIhLNTAL AIR IUCLS IHC 62.146.b3 TOOLS
125359 CONTINENTAL CHEMICAL CO 53.232.5i CHLORINE M.0.9-9-91
125366 CONTIALhTLL GRAPHICS Y1V5.36 BLURPRINTING
125361 CONTRACTUK'S SOON STORE 64.447.6. PUBLICATION
m 125362 CONVLRSE CONSULTANTS 6 L 1.3.123.25 RNGINERRING SERVICES I-9
X 125363 COOPLA IADUSTRIES INC &1`042.17 COMPUTER PARTS
= 125364 COSTA MESA AUTO SUPPLY Y916.43 TRUCK PARTS
125365 COUN71 WHCLLSALE ELECTRIC 69..5 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
OO 125566 CYIILRLA 62.2b4.uU SERVICE AGREEMENT
125367 CAL FOLY MELL066 UNIT iS.nuu.2L LAB SERVICES
12536E STATE OF CALIF ORNIA Y9.231..0 STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE
CO 125369 SIA7L OF CALIFORNIA 4230.13 DIESEL USE TAX
N 125376 STATC b4ARO Of 46UILI2ATION 6473.34 UNDERGROUND FUEL STORAOR TAX
125371 OE ARIA CORPORATION 115u.U, RENTAL EQUIPMENT
125372 PSK/UECKE6 $212.11 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
125373 OIATEC LNVIRGNNLNTAL $1.714.52 CHEMICALS
125374 DORADO ENTERPRISES INC Y9.28S.6U PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 RRPAIRS
125375 DUNN LUWAHOS CURT $560.91 PAINT SUPPLIES
125376 OU PLOT CO SAFETY SLNVICLS 61,653.3% LAD SUPPLIES
125377 LIL LNSTALMENTS INC 646.19 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
125376 LIM C6/NbS SUPPLY $9.31 FREIGHT
125379 EASTMAN INC $2.966.52 OFFICE SUPPLIES
125360 EJLh ANTLR INC 65."6..b OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92
1253bl ENV.IREX 62.576..0 FITTINGS
125302 FALCON DISPOSAL SLRVICL 65.98u..1 RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.O.10-9-91
125383 JOHN b FALKENSTLIN PC 33.114... CONSTRUCTION BERVICES 1-9. 1-16
125361 FASTENING SOLUTIONS INC $212.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES
125385 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 6T13.uu AIR FREIGHT
125386 FLNNELLGAS $25.52 PROPANE
125387 FILTERLINE CORP 652u.89 CHLORINATION PARTS
12631E FILTLR SUFPLV CU 6169.22 PUMP PARTS
125389 FISCHLN Y FONTER CU 16.45.6u CHLORINATION PARTS
12b396 FISHEP SCILNI1f IC CO 64.429.59 LAB BUPPLIRS
125391 FLU SYSTEMS .5.259.49 PUMP PARTS
12/\553392 FOUNTAIN VALLLT CAMLAA B`/ $62.6. FILM /F/
( C
FUND NO 9199 JT DIST WCkNING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE l6/L4/92 PAGE 3
REP OR NUMbER AP43
CUUNIT SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGL COUNTY
CLAIMS MID lu/21/92 POSTING DAIL 16/21/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
125393 FOUNIA16 VALLEY FAINT $209.14 PAINT SUPPLIES
125394 FbA INLuSINIAL GALES •317.47 FITTINGS
125395 THE FJABLNu CU 42.639.63 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
125396 C17T OF FUELLRTON $141.93 WATER USE
125397 6ANANL LUMBER CO 6J.ASL.4/ BUILDING MATERIALS
12539E 6ARRAIT CALLAIIAN CUMFANY 43.33U.bb OPERATING SUPPLIES
125399 GENERAL bIN01hG COMP 117b.23 OFFICE SUPPLIES
12b460 GENERAL LLECINIC SbFILT CO. 6196.9E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
12541.1 GENERAL TLLEPhDNE CD 44.171.19 TELEPHONE BERVICEB
12502 GEORGE LEECH L ASSUCIATLS E223.72 GAUGE
12$4L3 GIENLICh•PITCNELL INC 517.252.64 MECHANICAL PARTS
1254:4 DON ORLIN L ASSOCIATES 113.191... SURVEYING SERVICES N.0.6-10-92
1254Gb GERALU L GREER CO IML 1231.6E TRUCK PARTS
12E4.6 hSb TECnNCLJGV 6771.76L.lu CONSTRUCTION P2-66
12b4u7 HATCH L KIRK INC $214.86 ENGINE PARTS
1254ub HOLRbl GER CVS CALIF INC 6423.63 COMPUTER PARTS
TT7 12b4:9 HORIZON HIGH REACH a LWUIP $101.85 TRUCK PARTS
S 125414 J.T. HORVATH 1 ASSOC. 63.JG0... CONSTRUCTION SERVICES J-21-1, J-17
125411 AS hUGHLS CU INC 4969.66 HARDWARE
CG1 12b412 CITY Of HUNTI114101. bLACh 621.Tb WATER USE
125413 NUNTINGTON NO40A i1..91.42 LAB SUPPLIES
12b414 NVCL ONE I. 'ATDRIES INC 43.318.76 LAB SUPPLIES
bG 125415 IRG NEChANALISIS 13.u23.38 TOOLS
1 125416 IMPERIAL WL37 CHEMICAL 659.59b.U3 FERRIC CHLORIDE M.O.11-16-90
W 125417 INDUSTRIAL THREADED FRODUCTS 6273.15 CONNECTORS
12561E INDUSTRIAL MSTL 139.0u SUBSCRIPTION
125419 INFONTEAI SYSTEMS. INC. s1.49u.VW SERVICE AGREEMENT
12542E INSIDE L.P.A. $165.4. LAB SUPPLIES
125421 INTCRMLC 13.936.51 LAB SUPPLIES
125429 INTERSTATE bATILRY SYGILMS 5796.66 BATTERIES
125423 IRVINL DCSPIOP GRAPHICS 4116.52 COMPUTER SOFTWARB
125424 IRVINE RANCH .ATER UISThICI $92.7b WATER USE
125425 JLA CREDIT "RP $145.32 MICROFICHE READER LEASE
125426 GREAT WESTERN SANITARY SUPP 12.J21.67 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
12b427 JM JOHNSON GENERAL CURIA 62.500.1,0 DOOR RELOCATIONS
125420 JGNhSTLhE bUFILV 61.261.25 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
125429 JCNtS LHLMICALS INC 42.431.53 CHEMICALS
125430 JONES INDUSTRIAL MANGWARL O 61G6.41 HARDWARE
125431 RAP PROOLCTS 4499.17 TOOLS
125432 TELLY SERVICES 6312.3E TEMPORARY SERVICES
125433 KING BLARING INC $244.5b MACHINE SUPPLIES
125434 RAGA INDUSTRIAL SUPILILS 6795.74 LAB SUPPLIES
125435 MAPII6 KL6UICh IN 61.97U.Bu CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
125436 LA CLLLULAN 1LLLPHONE CU 4156.49 CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES
125437 LIMITOAUUE CORP 12.845.9E ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
125438 LINCOLN NATIONLL LIFE INS. CO. S1.8.82 DEFERRBD COMP TRANSFER
FUND NO 9199 JT GIST h1kKING CAPITAL PROCLSSIN6 DATE 10/14/92 PAGE 4
REPORT NUMBER AP93
CUUNTT SANITATION OISIRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 10/2092 POSTING DATE 16/21/92
WARRANT NO. VENUUk AMOUNT OLSCNIPIION
125439 AP LINUSIRUH INC $3.42J.0. CONSULTING SERVICES - ENVIRONMENTAL
12b44U MCL LABOAATORIIS S4.965.0� LAB SERVICES.
125441 NOT BIOLOGIC CONPANV A243.2b LAB SUPPLIES
12b442 MIS $61.2. PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
125443 NACOKCO 652u." SERVICE AGREEMENT
12b444 HAG SVSILNS S13..J1 INSTRUMENT PARTS
12b445 MAIIYTLKANCE PRODUCTS IKE $3.968.2b MECHANICAL SUPPLIES
12544b MARINE L VALVE SUPPLY $2,.0...3 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
125447 MAMVAC ELECTRONICS 5111.35 INSTRUMENT SUPPLIES
125448 MATE ChLUR INC S4.85b..4 CHLORINATION PARTS
12F449 MECHANICAL CHIVES CO 6391.11 INSTRUMENT
125450 MICNO MUTTON 53N19.18 INSTRUMENT
12501 MICRGAGL OF GLNAITGS s3.b4b.i7 COMPUTER SOFTWARE
12b452 MIOVAY MFG S MACHINING 52.465.:u MECHANICAL PARTS
12b453 MILLTRUI.ICS 42.2414.41 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1254L4 MINNES.IA LLSTLNN VISUAL IRKS. $143.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES
rn X 12b455 NLAULA bUhT1CM CONS7hUCT10A 45u2.686.Y. CONSTRUCTION 2-30
S 12b456 MOh TOUMLkl LAhGRATURILS 4315.6E LAB SERVICES
125457 MOTION IkuUSTMILS TUC i1U3.36 HARDWARE
OU 12b458 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 569.3b SAFETY FILM RENTALB
125459 NATIONAL VISUAL SYSTEMS S118.53 PRINTING
12 b166 ALVANA ELL G IR.hICS $168.65 ELECTRIC PARTS
O0 125461 NORLN PROCUCTS 61.1136.1b INSTRUMENT PARTS
1 125462 DX SYSTEMS CG 522.170.91 CHLORINE M.0.10-9-91
r 125463 OPERATION TEC,NUt OGT INC s1.AM5.25 SERVICE AGREEMENT
125464 ONAN6E COUNTY AUTO IAhT5 C S154.14 TRUCK PARTS
225465 ORANGE CCUNTT GhEMICAL CO s743.74 CHEMICALS
12546E ORANGE VALVL s FITTING CO. 519.743.1E FITTINGS
125467 OSCAR•S LLCM A SAFE S2310.64 SECURITY SUPPLIES
12E468 UATGEN SEPVICI 44.375.43 SPECIALTY mass
225469 COUNTY SANITATION 015TRICT SA3.240L24 REIMBURSE WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
125470 FACCO SALES $87.62 PAINT SUPPLIES
125471 PACIFIC PARTS s2.b32.66 INSTRUMENT PARTS
725472 PACIFIC t{FL11 LUUIPML%l CO s2.b22.03 SAFETY SUPPLIES
125473 PACIFIC bLLL $15..b TELEPHONE SERVICES
12b474 FACILL MEF161AN SYSTEMS 697P.69 TELEPHONE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS
12t475 FAGEALI S1b2..4 PAGER RBNTALS
12f176 FARA60h CAULK 536.71, CABLE SERVICES
125477 FEAT MKRJICK MAIN L CO $16.860.0, AUDITING SERVICES M.O.3-13-91
125470 Pin6AMGJ PhESS PIC $80.1. PUBLICATION
225479 FICKVIEA PAFEh 5645.1. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
12548G PIMA GMU SYSTEMS IhL Slib.i21.bb RESIDUALS REMOVAL M.0.5-8-91
125481 PITNi,T SCATS s266.lb POSTAGE MACHINE LEASE
125462 SCOTT POLK 42 N44.b7 DEFERRED COUP WITHDRAWAL
195483 FOLVMLTRIC5. INL. - $324... - EQUIPMENT RENTAL
125484 POLTPUAL INC $13.10b.31 CATIONIC POLYMER M.0.3-11-92
FUND NO 9159 • JT DIST LCkKING CAFITAL PROCESSING DATE IU/14/92 PALL 5
RLPONT NUMBLY AP43
C GUNTI SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAN6L COUNIT
CLAIMS PAID 1./21/92 POSTING DATE lU/2l/92
WARRANT MD. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
12L485 F'bWLk LLECTAO SUFPIV LU $97.2. ELECTRIC SUPPLIES
12546f PKECISICh IhOUbTRILS 460.1. ELECTRIC PARTS
125467 HAROLD PRIMROSE ICL 1196.:. ICE
126486 PROFLSSICRAL Sf RV1CL IND. 619J.YG BOIL TESTING
125489 THE PROJECT SOLUTIONS CO. 54.966..V INSTRUMENTATION INSPECTION M.0.7-17-91
125494 OUESTRON CORP i1.2 O4.u+ LAB SUPPLIED
126451 STEVE F. RADOS, INC. SS67..38.1u CONSTRUCTION 14-1-1A-2
125452 RAINbON CISPOSAL CO $1.429.49 TRASH REMOVAL
126493 RAISIN INSTRUMENT CO $2.942.13 LAB SUPPLIES
125494 NECTC INC 5145.596.11 RESIDUAI.B REMOVAL M.0.3-13-91
126495 THE REbISTLR 63.198.3u NOTICES 6 ADS
125496 - NEMUTE Mc TLh kLSLTTIAG SVSI 46...O.U. POSTAGE
125497 MCWUUKIN•PCPUBLIC SUFPLV 43.568.Sa PLUMBING SUPPLIER
125498 ROMAN LNGINLEhiNb CO 4L.680.61 ELECTRIC PARTS
125499 THOMAS L. ROOD S2.uOO.0U DEFSRRBD COMP EMERGENCY WITHDRAWAL
1265IC ROSEMOUNT 3592.1E INSTRUMENT PARTS
m 1255C1 JOSEPH T NYLHSON C SON IN 5045.64 METAL
X 1255T2 SAf LIV KLLEN CORF 686.7. SAFETY SUPPLIES
= 1255C3 SANTA FL INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS 12.529.46 PLUMBING SUPPLIES
b0 1255L4 DOUG SARVIS 4375.0. FIRST AID/CPR TRAINING
12550 SCIENCE AFFLICATIONS INT-L $137.706.79 OCEAN MONITORING M.O.6-10-92
—I 1255C6 SEA LIMO ELECTRONICS INC 61.396.Uu CAN SUPPLIES
lid 1255LT SHAMhUCM SOFTLY 42.472.81 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1255[S SRASIA ELECTRIC S8b.398.Ua ELECTRICAL SERVICES J-27
U1 1255L9 SHURLLUCK BALLS ab.220.15 HARDWARE
12551L SMITH EMERY Cu 52.562.Wu SOIL TESTING H.O.6-10-92
125511 SO COAST AIR WUALITY $16.00 PERMIT FBBB
125512 SVLTN COAST VATLR 695..d WATER UBE
125513 SOUTFIkh CAL If EDISON LO 673.122.7E PONIES,
12561A SO CAL LAS CO $9.153.16 NATURAL GRI
12Sb15 NESTALLUT INC "11.82 WELDING SUPPLIES
12551E SPLA INDUSTRIES INC $597.61 LAB SUPPLIES
125517 SRECO FLEPIBLE 42.725.79 TRUCE PARTS
125516 JAhES STANFILL CONSTRUCTION 62.0OO.Ou CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
125519 STATE STRLLT BAhM 611.4T5.04 COP TRUSTEE SERVICES
125524 STAILLIUL INSTALLERS s884.0, LAB SUPPLIBB
125521 SUNSEI FCRU $95.55 TRUCK PARTS
12552i SUPELCO INC 464.71 CONNECTORS
125523 SUPLA CHLM CUPP 42.u23.11 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
125524 SUFLA FULLk FRUUUC7S 4155.Lh JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
125525 TLkORAULICS 4178.N1 MECHANICAL PARTS
125526 TLKMAA COKPANV 19.71G.eb LAB SUPPLIES
125527 THONFSON INUUSTPIAL SUFF-LV 41.155..1 HARDWARE
12552b TUNV•S LUCK L SAFE SLRVICL 1818.14 LOCKSMITH SERVICES
125529 TOWNL CREATIVE SERVICES *552.61 PRINTING
12553E TUVU LANOSCAIING CO 44.172.37 CONTRACT GROUNDSKEEPING M.0.11-13-91
FUND NO 9199 JT UIST bCRMING CAPITAL PROCESSING DATE lu/14/92 PALL 6
REPORT WUNSCH AF43
COUNTY SANITATION UISTRICIS Of ORANGE COUNTY
CLAIMS PAID 1U21292 POSTING DATE 16/21/92
WARRANT NO. VENDOR AMOUNT DESCRIPTION
125531 TRUCK 6 AUTO SUPFLT INC 6182.19 TRUCK PARTS
125532 JG TUCKER 6 SON INC 56.85d.2V INSTRUMENT PARTS
125533 TWINING LAUGRATORIES OF Sb6b.5. LAB SUPPLIER
125534 US 4610 CLASS LINTERS b133.11 TRUCK PARTS -
12b535 UNDERGROU6b SERVICE ALERT $218.OW CONTRACT SERVICES
125536 UNITED NCITINGHAM $1.163..7 RENTAL EQUIPMENT
125537 UNITED FARCEL SERVICE S145.64 PARCEL SERVICES
225538 UNITED STATES ELEVATOR CORP 4827... SERVICE AGREEMENT
125539 SUPEh INTLf DENT OF DOCUMENTS V340.CV SUBSCRIPTION
125b4G V.R SCIENIIFIL $7,767.91 LAB SUPPLIES
12b541 VALLEY CITIES SUPFLY CO 5788.94 PLADMING SUPPLIES
12b542 VERNE-S PLUNWING b145..r PLUMBING SERVICES
12bb43 - VERTEA SYSTEMS $817.5. CONFUTER DATA SUPPORT
12bb44 6ASHIN610N VISTA INT. NOTLL 55SO.V. TRAINING REGISTRATION
125645 WEAThLN AAU 91144) INSTRUMENT 6291.36 SAFETY SUPPLIES
m 12554b WESTERN HI&HNAY FKUDUCTS IN 5376.U5 TRUCE PARTS
X 125547 WESTERN STATES CHEMICAL SUPFLY 582061.23 CAUSTIC SODA M.O.8-8-90
2 12b54b VLSTIN ENGINEERINO 41,527.39 ENGINEERING SERVICES
125549 NOURKL A WOODRUFF A 0k S1b6.161.65 LNGAL SERVICES M.0.2-19-92
12b55b WJ6UFEhtEL7 CORP 839..A COMPUTER SOFTWARE
125551 VLNTUkA SOFTWARE INC. b161.63 SERVICE AGREEMENT
12b552 GEONGE TANDLLY CO $569.78 VALVE
125553 YARDLEY - INSTRUMENIS 5551.95 INSTRUMENT PARTS
1 125554 ZIEBARTH L ALEER/C.S. ALFEN 977048.4E CONSTRUCTION P2-42-1
Ol
TOTAL CLAIMS PAID 1./21/92 54072.685.11
z zzzszzszsszzzz::
SUMMARY AMOUNT
M1 OPER FUND 82,796.1E
M2 CAP PAC FUND $57,054.71
M2 OPER FUND $9,405.30
M2 CAP PAC FUND $396,010.54
43 OPEN FUND $42,194.99
M3 CAP FAC FUND $242.48
MS OPER FUND $4,033.37
MS CAP FAC FUND $4,536.74
M6 OPEN FUND $57.31
M7 OPER FUND $23,958.99
M7 CAP FAC FUND $1,072.85
M11 OPER FUND $6,721.97
M14 OPER FUND $47.76
M14 CAP FAC FUND $319,706.77
P566 OPEN FUND $1,270.90
M566 CAP FAC FUND $602.50
MIS OPER FORD $2,685.07
JT OPER FUND 1,046,825.28 r
C 815,365.2E }{`
VGO IIORANCB FUNDS 1 , 9.23
'AXING CAPITAL - 62 94
---------- t
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
lam/ COUNTY OF ORANGE )
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 54954 .2,
I hereby certify that the Agenda for the Adjourned Regular Board
Meettiing. of Districts Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 and 14 held
on /l�p�t� pw �,(�, 19fa_ was duly posted for public inspection
at the main lobby of the Districts' offices on
19Q�.
IN WWIITNNE-SIS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this
day of 19j&&.
Penny Kyle, A t Secretary of
each of the B rW of Directors
of County Sanitation Districts
Nos . 1 , 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 6
14 of Orange County, California
L�